lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Appeasement

message: Three British journalists, Michael Foot, Frank Owen and Peter Howard, writing under the name of "Cato" in their book Guilty Men, called for the removal from office of 15 public figures they held accountable, including Baldwin and Chamberlain.
I have deleted the name of Baldwin from the sentence because he was out of government office since 1937, merely a backbench House of Lords member at the time of the book's publication. In addition, another of the 'Guilty Men', Ramsay MacDonald (anyway unpopular with the Labour left after he coalitioned with the Conservatives) had died in 1937. A check of the article on the book gives only 15 names so it is incorrect to say the writers wanted all 15 removed from office.Cloptonson (talk) 06:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of ''Guilty Men'' inaccurate

message: I well recall reading a (single-volume) biography of Chamberlain in the 90s which had a chapter looking at appeasement during his government, that it recorded a quote which as far as I can recall was this (a few of the words might not be what were printed, hence my suggestion it be checked out): "Most people opposed appeasement in hindsight, few were against it at the time." I am not sure if the quote was from a historian (such as AJP Taylor) or a commentator (such as Harold Nicolson). If the quote could be found and the book cited, I am sure this would be a hit-in-the-eye point to include in this article to help illustrate how the acceptance of appeasement changed once WWII intervened. I certainly found the analysis an eye opener that showed how widespread support for it had been.Cloptonson (talk) 09:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote regarding changing view of appeasement pre/post WWII - suggest check and include

message: It's a small thing, and I have no idea how to fix it, so I am flagging it in case someone passes through and knows what to do Sorry if this is the wrong place to do that, I don't have experience with anything more than very minor edits. Aisleway (talk) 02:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: The tab (at least on my MacOS/Chrome) says "appearance" instead of appeasement
Talk:USS Forrestal

message: Since the article already mentions USS Zippo, Forest Fire, and Fire Stall, might as well mention the other one as well.  "FID" was also said to stand for "Forrestal in Distress." Old CDR (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  FID 

message: In both the infobox and the lead, are a trio of unsupported nicknames. "Forest fire", was added on 2005-02-02, "USS Zippo" was added on 2006-03-24 and "Firestal" was added on 2008-11-02. Though there is a "cite needed" tag attached to them in the lead, they've been in "need of cites" for 15 to 18 years now. I think it's time to accept that refs are not on the way. I'd just go and boldly remove these supposed monikers, except that there were some edits made to them today (which brought my attention to them) and this is a long-term article, so I figure some input here first wouldn't hurt. Cheers - wolf 05:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe that #'s 1, 2, 3 & 5 would be considered reliable sources. As for #4 & 7, they might be ok, but some other editor feedback would be helpful. As for #6, I know there was a recent cull of sources, similar to this site, at RSN by . When I did a search, I didn't find this specific site noted there, but did find it in another RSN dicussion where it was listed as an "SPS". What are your thoughts on these sites, ? - wolf 06:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the ping, on first look through I think only #4 is adequate. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames
Talk:Psycho (1960 film)

message: A video of the shower scene would be useful for various reasons, but is it in the public domain and can it be shown? Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not public domain. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So, can it be shown in the Wikipedia article? Klee Bakudan (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No. - kosboot (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Psycho in the public domain? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Psycho (1960 film) →  – As one of the most influential films of all time, this is clearly the primary topic of the term "Psycho", both in terms of long-term significance and pageviews. It is also worth noting that while the informal term "psycho" can mean either psychopath or psychotic, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose: too broad for the film to be the primary meaning, and if anything, the novel came before its adaptation yet the article it's rightly titled Psycho (novel). Searching for 'psycho' should redirect to a disambiguation page. 2A02:B125:10:4044:6BB8:9B81:138C:9959 (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2024 

message: The Legacy section of the article lists a number of films that reference it.  If a suitable reference can be found it might be appropriate to mention the novel Dark in Death, as the story starts with a woman being murdered in a movie theater during the shower scene. JDZeff (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:National Assembly

message: This article combines a lot of elements from other types of aticles, such as lists, tables and disambigs. There isn't much said, and what is said, is mainly wrong. I take the format as I find it, however. It adds material not in the lists. At the moment I would like to address the access problem. If you are looking to find the good old National Assembly of revolutionary France, you won't find it so easily. What I plan to do is add a disambig page and a redirect from National Assembly to National Assembly (disambiguation). For the disambig I see another model, that for Estates General. The disambig will lead us to the appopriate page in one click with only the trouble of looking at the disambig.Branigan 12:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig
Talk:Unit 731

message: Including furiganas as they’re used in this article seems, to me, to be pure pedantry. They provide no information, as they can without any effort be deduced from the provided romanization by anyone who would know what they are. Even the Japanese article does not use furiganas to provide the reading of “731部隊”. What other articles about Japanese topics do use them? Tokyo, Sushi, Shueisha don’t. Any argument in favor of leaving them here? palpalpalpal (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I’m removing them. palpalpalpal (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the furiganas? 

message: CHANGE
 “MacArthur struck a deal with Japanese informants:[107] he secretly granted immunity to the physicians of Unit 731, including their leader, in exchange for providing America solely, with their research on biological warfare and data from human experimentation”
TO
“MacArthur struck a deal with Japanese informants:[107] he secretly granted immunity to the physicians of Unit 731, including their leader, in exchange for exclusive American access to their research on biological warfare and data from human experimentation.” 2601:282:1A7E:6570:75BB:7D17:E7:88EF (talk) 03:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 07:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2023 

message: Is there a reason that source 114 is some random guy's Master's thesis which cites a book by a published historian, instead of just citing the historian directly? It should cite Sheldon H Harris' "Factories of Death", either page 230 in my version or page 321 according to the thesis.
Also, this line "(with one prisoner dying in prison and the other committing suicide inside his cell)." is not backed up by Harris' book or any other source in the article.
According to Harris "The twelve defendants who were convicted received remarkably lenient sentences, given the serious nature of the crimes they committed. The sentences ranged from a low of two years to a high of twenty-five years of hard labor. No one was sentenced to death, despite their confessions to having killed countless Soviet citizens.33 All twelve were repatriated to Japan by 1956."
I'm new so I don't want to make major changes by myself, but the choice of citation is just strange, and its also odd that the line about two of the prisoners dying is not sourced and is directly contradicted by the historian who wrote a book on the subject. DavidEidolon1 (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Soviet trials 

message: Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimes against humanity category removal
Talk:Gram–Schmidt process

message: I have two complaints about this section!
First of all, the section defines some vectors ei and then never mentions them again. Frankly, I have no idea what's going on there.
Secondly, the section contains the text: "Note that the expression for uk is a "formal" determinant, i.e. the matrix contains both scalars and vectors; the meaning of this expression is defined to be the result of a cofactor expansion along the row of vectors."
I highly doubt that this explanation will be the least bit enlightening to anyone who didn't already know what was going on, and I also doubt that the link would be very enlightening with a bit of additional context. (For instance, the text should indicate which row the Laplace expansion is being taken over - the last one - and then indicate the formula as a linear combination of the v's  with coefficients combing from the corresponding minor determinants.) 2602:30A:C04C:5F30:805:108B:A61A:2175 (talk) 23:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Determinant formula 

message: The Matlab implementation for the Gram-Schmidt process is for a specific norm and inner product definition (here being the Standard Euclidean Inner Product and by it's extension the 2-norm). 
Should be updated to reflect that.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackMetalStats (talk • contribs) 00:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article originally said that the method had appeared in the work by both Laplace and Cauchy, citing the Cheney and Kincaid book.  But the book only mentions that Laplace was "familiar" with the method. I couldn't see a reference to Cauchy on Google Books, but I don't have a copy of the book. Arguably a better historical reference is needed.Improbable keeler (talk) 06:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical origins

message: If we consider proj_{n}(v) := \frac {<n,v>}{<n,n>} n, I proof the set you get isn't orthogonal to ech other. Let's proof:
For the field we consider Complex Numbers. If proj_{n}(v) := \frac {<n,v>}{<n,n>} n  then we begin by compute  u_i .
 u_1 = v_1 
 u_2 = v_2 - proj_{u_1}(v_2)
Now see what happen when  <u_2,u_1> :
<u_2,u_1>=<v_2-proj_{u_1}(v_2),u_1>=<v_2-proj_{v_1}(v_2),v_1> = <v_2,v_1>-<proj_{v_1}(v_2),v_1>
= <v_2,v_1> - < \frac {<v_1,v_2>}{<v_1,v_1>} v_1 , v_1 > 
Now the  \frac {<n,v>}{<n,n>}  is number in field so we can get it out of bracket as define .
 <v_2,v_1>-\frac {<v_1,v_2>}{<v_1,v_1>} < v_1 , v_1 > = <v_2,v_1>-<v_1,v_2> 
and that ISN'T Zero in Complex Vector Space; But if you write the correct form which is  proj_{n}(v) := \frac {<v,n>}{<n,n>} n  every think make sense.
Firouzyan (talk) 21:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The definition of projection is INCORRECT+Proof
Talk:Folklore of the United States

message: Surely some of the European settlers felt that Native Americans were savages, but should we really list Geronimo, Pocahontas, Squanto and Hiawatha under "Animals and Savages" as if there were no disputing that they were no more civilized than bigfoot? So I'm just going to remove them from that category, and if anyone feels they should be in this article, perhaps they can insert them somewhere not so demeaning. --Misfit 03:44, 8 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pocahontas a Savage? 

message: It says that the 2020 presidential election is folklore. I find that hard to believe. We should remove it. PythonicWikier (talk) 01:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I assume the logic is that there was a ton of 'mythology' around the election. Hoaxes of voter fraud and pseudo-religious nonsense in favor of Trump absolutely garnered a mythic cycle around the event that can very well be considered 'folklore'. And I mean, several pieces of American folklore are just political upheaval given a folklorical bend--Amelia-the-comic-geek (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the 2020 presidential election "folklore" 

message: I was going to add Tarleton add to the list but he’s not a hero as the paragraph say. Yet Benedict Arnold is included. Could Tarleton be an anti-hero? Or under some other category? 
There are certainly plenty of stories about him. What comes to mind are the tales of women dropping their babies and nannies frightening children by mentioning his name. 
Maybe there should be a section entitled “Villains”! In addition to Tarleton, it could include Butler, Brant, and Wemyss. You could even throw in King George III ! What do you think? Humphrey Tribble (talk) 06:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps they were the folk devils of their era. Dimadick (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn’t familiar with that concept. Thank you for pointing out the article . Tarleton was certainly demonized. The persecution of Tories might also fit. I suppose the way Patriots described “The British” as a kind of evil symbol qualifies them as folk devils. I will do at least a quick search to see if the concept has been applied to the revolution in any way. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 23:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banastre Tarleton ? 

message: Here, it says that this page links Weezer. Where does this occur in the page? Or am I just misunderstanding the tool? Omega9872 (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Omega9872, they're linked in the Shaker music template box next to the Shaker music section. Woodroar (talk) 19:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Omega9872 (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weezer?
Talk:Motor vehicle theft

message: Why in this order and not "grand auto theft"?? --46.114.36.222 (talk) 05:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I, not being a native English speaker, want add to this question: why not even just "grand car theft"? --2003:DE:F23:9500:7C0C:91E1:F7B4:E6F8 (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why grand theft auto?  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. WP:SNOW. Universal opposition. Withdrawing request. (non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 May 2023 

message: موتور دزدیدن برای خودشون راحت فروختن یکی هم راحت داره سوار میشه انگار نه انگار صاحب موتور منم که ۱۵۰ میلیون تومان پول اون موتور هستش 5.114.163.255 (talk) 06:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  موتورسیکلت آپاچی 160 4v مدل 98 سرقت شده در تاریخ 30 دی 1401 تهران و در تاریخ 12 اسفند1402 در شهر قم محله انسجام به اسم مزایده فروخته شده
Talk:July

message: Barely a Start class.
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 17:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: "July starts on the same day of the week as April in common years."
Why does it matter whether we're talking about a leap year?  
Doesn't 1 July occur 91 (7 * 13) days after 1 April every year?
--AndersW (talk) 00:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 July same day of week as 1 April 

message: The article contains a sepia-toned photo of a boy on a playground, captioned "The Great Nawaf."  I'm mystified as to why this photo and caption are present, and what they have to do with the month of July. 71.219.218.241 (talk) 19:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Nawaf? 

message: See Talk:List_of_month-long_observances#Keeping_this_article_and_the_various_articles_on_months_in_sync. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open RfC related to this article. 

message: Several sites say Quintilis was renamed in 44BC, after Caesar had died (i.e. March 44BC).
Anyone know when?
Was July 44BC called July? MBG02 (talk) 00:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When 

message: clan stars month signifies the month July (which I think is standing for Jump Jap July)
why do is clan stars month celebrated It is celebrated because it shows the respect of clans and the love of Clan season. Clan season is on the other topic 161.0.240.179 (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  July is the month of clan stars 

message: clan season is the season of clans, which is why it shows the same thing on clan stars month 161.0.240.179 (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is clan season?
Talk:List of long-distance trails in the United States

message: Jordan River Trail is described as a Utah trail which does exist, but since Wikipedia redirects to a page about a trail in Michigan the link on this page is not accurate. --Faidtastic (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan River Trail Improperly Linked 

message: The Uinta Highline trail is not on here. It's definitely a long distance hiking trail (King's Peak - highest peak in Utah etc.) and it is very remote and beautiful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.224.5 (talk) 07:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the article Highline Trail (Utah) describe that trail?  —EncMstr (talk) 10:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Uinta Highline 

message: The Outer Mountain Loop trail in Big Bend National Park is 30+ miles long and usually takes at least 3 days. Wouldn't that constitute long distance?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbranyon (talk • contribs) 06:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outer Mountain Loop 

message: I am looking to hike from Florida to Alaska and wanted to know what and if there are any trails to take? I am wanting to stay off as many beaten pathes as possible! Namdrib30 (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a general discussion venue.  This page in particular is for discussing improvements to the associated article.  However, perusal of this article clearly could be of help.  If you need advice, forums, etc., try Googling for 'hike from florida to alaska'.  —EncMstr (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida to Alaska trail? 

message: The article on long-distance trails sets a lower bound of . I do not see the justification for so many trails below that lower bound. Is there an objection with justification to removing those below that lower bound from this list? —¿philoserf? (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am joining a very old discussion here, but note that the Long-distance trail article defines the term as 50 kilometers, not miles. Therefore the cutoff point in this list article could be 50k/30m, but if so alot of trails around the country are missing. I find the whole thing to be an arbitrary and unsupported distinction, to be honest. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  17:38, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so many short trails
Talk:Triangular number

message: On the Mac in both Chrome and Safari, the formula immediately after "The triangular numbers are given by the following explicit formulas:" seems to be truncated, i.e. cutoff at the right edge GeorgeColp (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: On my Mac (both Chrome and Firefox, didn't try Safari) there is a gray horizontal scrollbar immediately before the formula. The fact that the wide formula scrolls is suboptimal, but it can still be read in its entirety. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I missed that. It looks like it is now fixed,thanks again! GeorgeColp (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting / display error
Talk:111 (number)

message: Could someone (Australian?) please elaborate on the meaning of the last paragraph of the cricket sense:  -->When any aussie rules scores are G.B = 111 points, and the radio call is on 3AW, the game call team read the score in extravegent voices, led by Rex Hunt, followed by; "LORD NELSON!"<-- 11Jul08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Kidson (talk • contribs) 12:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cricket

message: I believe Magic squares require the diagonal to also add up to the magic number, so the squares in this article do not qualify. Is there a term for squares in which the rows and columns but not diagonals add up toth e same number? --S Philbrick(Talk) 14:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic squares
Talk:Dennis O'Keefe

message: Some mention should be made of the fact that Dennis starred in several films noir, such as T-Men, Raw Deal, and Abandoned.
L. Thomas W. (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Noir 

message: Is there any reason for the shot with Carmen Miranda to appear in the section on  Personal life? There's no indication they were ever personally involved together.
--Thnidu (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carmen Miranda
Talk:Usher

message: This should be a disambiguation page.  -- Zoe
:Done. -- Christopherlin 07:03, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: What did the public school usher do? John Walter Huddleston was one! Cutler 20:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public school usher 

message: This page should automatically redirect to the entertainer. All the other stuff is more than irrelevant in comparison. 77.57.95.56 (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What entertainer? Johnbod (talk) 21:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 
Talk:Arthur Honegger

message: I have inserted the recordings listed at the main page into a table which can be found at the separate page Arthur Honegger Discography. Unless anybody objects I will delete the list of recodings at the main page. I believe that would facilitate an easier reading.--Classickol 17:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As noone objected I have removed the list.--Classickol 07:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

text: No, it's spelled Honegger. ErinKM 04:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: hey. how is honegger swiss when he was born in le havre?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.91.116 (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His parents were from Zurich. He remained a Swiss citizen his whole life. ErinKM 13:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  swiss/french 