lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Parafaith War

message: The article indicates that the Revenant troid ships travel via translation. My recollection is that the ships are in fact sublight ships (hence the cryogenic suspention), although I do not have a copy of the book availble to check.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.173.171 (talk) 23:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sorcerer (film)

message: Having just seen the film again, this time the Blu-Ray version I'm wondering if the "cliffhanger ending" still applies as I hear a gunshot at the very end.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.216.68.148 (talk • contribs) 05:43, 9 July 2014‎ (UTC)
: Friedkin did a new sound mix for the bluray with a lot of changed and updated sound effects, including dubbing in a gunshot over the last shot of the movie which was not part of the original mix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.112.170 (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cliffhanger ending? 

message: Whoever wrote the summary misunderstood the plot at a number of points. I've corrected the timeline of Serrano and Kassem's deaths.
Another that needs correction: Nilo's death did not occur until after Dominguez had begun to hallucinate, and Dominguez did not know of this until his hallucination ended. 24.62.224.22 (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: A reviewer is quoted as saying that the film has a "cliffhanger finale." It does not. It may appear that way to viewers who don't watch the last minute of the film, but in fact what happens is relatively clear. 24.62.224.22 (talk) 22:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another thing 
Category talk:Geography of Hawaii

message: The request to post more about my nomination of this category for the categories for deletion page is resonable. I did it because it appeared to be a duplicate of Geography of Hawaii but now I understand that its aim is something slightly different. I believe that the name similarities are going to cause continual confusion between the two categories and perhaps this one needs a more distinct name. I am willing to withdraw my nomination if you are able to persuade me that there is a solution to this. I'll keeping watching this page for other comments.
My attention was initially brought to this category because Hawaian geography stubs is both a category and subcategory of this group, causing a category cycle. This should be remedied, but I'll leave it up to someone else.
JonHarder 19:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFD Discussion 

message: I've added the clean cat tag due to the current organization of this category.  There is massive duplication of categories, random lists, and no clear structure. I would like this category to conform to Wikipedia standards. —Viriditas | Talk 23:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean cat
Talk:The Brink's Job

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Is Robert Prosky really in this? He's not listed on IMDB, and I can't find any other resource that links him with the film. Halmyre (talk) 08:46, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast
Talk:To Live and Die in L.A. (film)

message: :Strangely enough, Petersen went on to star as the lead in Mann's next film, Manhunter (1986).
This sentence really rubs me the wrong way. I don't see what's strange about using an actor from this movie after suing the director. It's an interesting fact though, perhaps it should be moved to Trivia? --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 20:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strangely enough?

message: "Parts of the film were shot in known gang Los Angeles territory..."  How is this relevant? Wilmington and San Pedro are also "known" gang territory; you could include almost every location in L.A. for that matter.  Other than a couple of scenes filmed in those areas, the movie has nothing to do with L.A. street gangs.  Suggest merging under a single "filming locations" heading.  310.21834.020
:Agreed. Changes made!  ♦ Luigibob ♦  "Talk to Luigi!"  13:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance?

message: Can we change the current "To Live and Die in L.A." film link by adding (film) right next to it?  That way, a disambiguation page can be created for both the film and the soundtrack, so in case people want to see the soundtrack but wind up with the movie, they have a choice. Morea37 06:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separating the links between the film and soundtrack

message: I took out what seemed to be some exceptionally non-objective verbage.  Additionally, I deleted the claim that the film had a 86% on Rotten Tomatoes, as there was no link to said rating, and the movie does not have an aggregate score on the site.  I hope I've made the world a  better place with these changes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.155.174 (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/Deletion 

message: Should there be an article about the novel that this film is based on? Does it have a different ending from the movie?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.130.247 (talk) 05:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel

message: There are fundamental flaws in the plot line which have been completely overlooked by the standard media. To wit: Why does the partner Vukovich choose to go to Masters' own lawyer (out of a possible twenty thousand lawyers in L.A.) knowing that Grimes will likely blab it all to Masters? (The scene in the burning warehouse proves he did just that.) And then since Masters knows that Chance is a federal agent, why does he still deal with him and why is he surprised when Chance pulls out a gun and tries to arrest him? Answer: Because Friedkin wants to have it both ways: he wants Masters to be so cooly smart as to realize the buyers aren’t who they claim to be but he’s still so dumb that he’ll deal with known Secret Service agents who are hellbent on stinging him. As said, there are no discussions of this lapse of motivational logic in the media, although it is seen on certain YouTube forums, so how to record it in Wikipedia without a source? Orthotox (talk) 23:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot incoherency
Talk:The Hunted (2003 film)

message: This is not the only movie titled "The Hunted." We'll have to at least acknowledge the 1995 film, but there may be more. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 15:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Films 

message: "The film ends on the Hawthorne Bridge in Portland." This is false (I just saw the movie).
I'm going to remove this sentence - if I knew what the dam(?) construction where the action does end was called, I'd replace it, but I don't. 85.227.226.235 (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  film ending location 
Talk:Bedazzled (1967 film)

message: I'm wondering. When George quotes Proust, it seems like he's probably having us on, right? Would esteemed literary so and so Marcel Proust say that if you could listen to a girl jabber until 3AM, then you're in? I just don't know. 66.41.66.213 06:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proust 

message: why is this low  while the remake (2000) is rated mid? 123.255.52.182 (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: This film was made after the success of Peter Cook and Dudley Moore's TV series "Not Only... But Also". The deadpan pop song sung by Peter Cook during the pop star sequence ("Bedazzled") has been covered in a duet by Nick Cave and Anita Lane. x.imeem.com/19ZZRMJ+RJ - 106k . MBG 119.11.1.71 (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick Cave and Anita Lane 

message: Is the name Spigott or Spiggott? Could someone please rectify this? I'd like to but I have no idea what the real spelling should be. Thank you. Raisin56 (talk) 12:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent spelling 

message: The plot summary is currently 967 words long, which is excessive. I will try to trim it down to under 700. Invertzoo (talk) 13:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of plot summary 

message: There is another Wikipedia article that discusses the 2000 remake. I don't see any links to that listed however.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.32.73.34 (talk) 23:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of 2000 remake
Talk:The Killing of Sister George

message: This supposed improvement is ungrammatical and incoherent:
:The Killing of Sister George is a once controversial play and film version of it, noted mainly for their treatment of lesbianism.
so I have reverted to this better version:
:The Killing of Sister George (1968) is a once controversial lesbian film directed by Robert Aldrich based on a play by Frank Marcus. Colin4C 09:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Grammar
Talk:True Crime (1999 film)

message: At the end of the movie, I hope it would not be a spoiler at this point to mention that Eastwood proves the prisoner's innocence, does the prisoner actually die? This has always been something I can't tell for sure. I'd assume not based on the amount and order of drugs but can anyone confirm this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.172.207 (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot stub
Talk:Absolute Power (film)

message: In info box, the source website URL is to the right of the dollar amount. I believe it needs fixed, but don’t know how to fix it. 71.84.30.28 (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike Allen  07:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Office link/source needs formatted
Talk:A Perfect World

message: I'm not so sure Red thought Butch was a good man, just that he thought he didn't deserve Death.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Duncan (talk • contribs) 02:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good man? 

message: This section is unsourced and should be converted into proper prose. I've moved it here for the time being until it can be sourced and integrated back into the article in appropriate sections.--J.D. (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: I removed the following from the article and bring it here for discussion.
:The fact that Phillip has never had cotton candy or a party (not birthday) is attributed to his religion when in fact Jehovah's Witnesses have never condemned either of these activities."Do All Parties Please God?." Learn From the Great Teacher. Watchtower. 2003. chapter 29 Additionally, when questioned by Butch about his theft of the Casper costume, Phillip says he is afraid of going to hell. However, Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe in hell as a punishment for sin.watchtower.org - What Has Happened to Hellfire?watchtower.org - A Closer Look at Some Myths About Death
This film might misrepresent the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses, I wouldn't know, but these references are not appropriate or adequate to prove the point.  If reliable, third party sources can be found that address the issue, that is another story. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 04:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inexact portrayal of Jehovah's Witnesses beliefs 

message: Why is the plot set exactly three weeks before the Kennedy assasination? Is there a special reason for this? The action could as well have taken place decades before or after.80.141.26.172 (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Clint wanted to, obviously. If you'd like to make a movie set decades before or after, feel free. 203.160.80.156 (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why 1963?
Talk:White Hunter Black Heart

message: there is a mistake in plot section spelling mistake in paragraph senten,the word chum is wrong it should be cum, the writer chum does not makes any sense its the writer cum peter verril.take note wikipedia admin of this article here,i pointed out the mistake  if your thinks there is no mistake or its just confusion of my eyes reply me.thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.62.73.97 (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Bird (1988 film)

message: The soundtrack probably deserves an article to itself. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack

message: The PBS documentary "Warner Brothers:  You Must Remember This"  should be cited somewhere in the article.  Terry Semel was the head of Warner Brothers, and was the person who gave Eastwood the approval to do "Bird."   In the documentary, Semel says he told Eastwood that Bird would have a very small audience;  Semel felt most of the general public was not interested in a feature film about the Jazz scene.   Looking at the article, it seems Semel was correct;  According to the figures cited in the article, the film cost from nine to fourteen million dollars, and receipts were only two million dollars.  In the documentary, Semel says he told Eastwood to go ahead with the film, and "we'll (Warner Brothers) sell the heck out of it."   74.166.156.250 (talk) 21:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Warner Brothers
Talk:The Dead Pool

message: The article gives February  / March 1988 as the shooting period for the film. It also says that Popwell was not available due to a scheduling conflict with "Who's that Girl" That film had however already been released in 1987. There has to be a different time / film. 2A02:2454:9D26:6300:D9B3:55E0:2A15:B628 (talk) 23:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert Popwells scheduling conflict
Talk:The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (1921 film)

message: Ramon Novarro (the most common spelling of his surname) and chief Tahachee only had small parts in this film, so I removed the misleading material suggesting they had lead roles. However, since both men were or did become famous for other work, I added some details about them at the end of the write up. Devil Doll 16:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable small roles

message: It is missing the film's plot, might I suggest adding it.--Paleface Jack (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I have moved this article from The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse to The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (1921 film). This was necessitated by a correction to the title of the article for the 1962 film, which had been incorrectly titled Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. By correcting that article's title and adding The, the title of this article needed to be changed as well. Gcjnst (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change 

message: box says 'Budget $800,000 or $1 million', but footnoted source ONLY says $1 million! text says $800,000 but no source Arxhs (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  budget
Talk:City Heat

message: To reach start class, a cast section should be added, along with two other sections of information (ex: box office, reception, DVD release, production, etc.). --Nehrams2020 08:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub to start
Talk:Every Which Way but Loose

message: Shouldn't this and that link to each other? I assume they have the same format as apes, trucks and an idiot feature prominently in both. And I ask rather than do as I have never seen any of the episodes or movies, or ever will. MartinSFSA (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BJ and the Bear 

message: This article says the orang was beaten to death right after shooting, but the Wiki article for the sequel says "Manis was the trained orangutan who played Clyde, Clint Eastwood's orangutan sidekick from the 1978 box office hit Every Which Way But Loose. Its 1980 sequel, Any Which Way You Can (1980), did not feature Manis, as he had grown too much between productions. "
So what's that story? Clearly one of them is wrong. 70.91.35.27 (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted said factoid because there was no actual proof. Lots42 (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clyde's Fate?
Talk:Thunderbolt and Lightfoot

message: I liked "Thunderbolt and Lightfoot" when it first came out but it bears a striking similarity to "Charade" (1963), in that both movies are about some old war buddies and some missing money (and George Kennedy is in both movies!).  Anybody know if Michael Cimino got his inspiration for his movie from "Charade" with Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn?  I actually like "Thunderbolt and Lightfoot" better because it's an American iconographic film with sweeping vistas of the American West and raw, primal American energy, but it's plot seems derivative.63.198.18.132 (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! I didn't want to create a new section for this. But I did want to thank and congratulate the writer of the article, because I didn't see any typographical errors to correct, which makes for a very nice, welcome change of pace! Thank you very much! Congratulations on a job well done too! :-) LeoStarDragon1 (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

text: Brain damage from when Red kicked them in the head. Based on how slowly the symptoms progressed, it's likely that their skull was gradually filling with blood, putting pressure on the right side of their brain, like a stroke in slow motion. 81.110.77.253 (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to "Charade"
Talk:Two Mules for Sister Sara

message: When is the film set? johnnybriggs (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think just sometime during the Franco-Mexican War:  8 December 1861 - 21 June 1867.  Fustigate314159 (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Setting

message: The entire story section of this article is ripped VERBATIM from []
:Agreed. Deleted section, see below. Fat&Happy (talk) 06:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Fat&Happy (talk) 06:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Paint Your Wagon (musical)

message: I haven't seen the musical, so I apologize if the answer is obvious in the show, but I'm curious about why Wikipedia refers to "They Call the Wind Maria" as "the Celtic song."  Does it have something to do with being Celtic?  I can't find any reference for that; is that phrase just a joke? --Elysdir 03:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No one's stepped up and documented it, and I felt suspicious of it as soon as I saw the article, so I removed it. Marieblasdell (talk) 02:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celtic song?
Talk:Private Hell 36

message: There are a couple of problems with this summary.  The criminal killed with the money is not a counterfeiter, he is a suspected murderer who simply passes phony bills.
Also, they are never assigned to look for the missing cash.  Finally, it's not fair to describe Bruner as a roque cop before he steals the money. I am going to edit.
Pete Best Beatles (talk) 03:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pete Best Beatles, I have discovered a very long plot summary, which may be of assistance. You did a good job, expanding, (so much better than before!) but this might be useful, if you are interested. It's not particularly well-written, but has many details. . Regards, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 22:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You're subtlety telling me my plot summary isn't long enough, and you're right (149 words), but I've got to tell you that was within a week of my very first edit, and I'm sure I didn't know about the 400-700 word rule from WP:FILMPLOT yet, or I wouldn't have let that stand (although it was a Plot Too Short template in an article that inspired me to start editing in the first place). I saw mention of gnomes on your user page, well I've been both derided and complimented for my gnomish behavior -- some time ago, when I thought about the ramifications of the 400-700 rule for both plots too long and too short, I looked at hundreds of films noir I had watched to that point. I did a word count on each and every one, and made notes, then approached the Teahouse about putting templates on the ones that broke the rule either way. I'm glad you showed me that, and I appreciate the link to the FIA synopsis, but I have to say I'm uncomfortable using anyone else's observations or words for my plot summaries. I trust myself, and it might be hard to get the wording right since I think it would be out of context. I'm happy to put expanding the plot summary for Private Hell 36 on my to do list, but I'll follow my procedure and start by watching the movie again and going from there.  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pete Best Beatles I rarely work in film areas, but I like to look for print sources. I didn't know there was a length parameter (short or long!) So sorry. The fact that you can access and then write the plot summaries is absolutely admirable, and I (personally & WP, in particular, I'm sure) prefer to see you follow your procedure, and support your desire to do so. I just didn't know! Now, I'm having this "well, duhh" moment about film synopsis (sp?) I have read. (Duhh, duhh, duhh.) So, you have taught me something new. I'm more accustomed to working from print sources, for biographies and science, so please forgive me for being waay out of my depth. Late at night, tired, writing poorly, need to stop. Regards and respect, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 04:14, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: I tweaked your edit.  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 02:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your recent edit
Talk:Charley Varrick

message: plot summary? It just stops in the middle of the film? Am I gonna have to do this myself? (Sigh!) 68.223.55.18 16:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with that 

message: 1) Frequent character actor Tom Tully, appearing as "Tom" the proprietor of the gunshop.
2) Hollywood cowboy veteran Bob Steele, appearing (uncredited) as the bank guard killed in the opening episode. 203.218.218.136 (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you check the full cast list at the Internet Movie Database site, it's actually far more than two characters.  Listing all the characters and actors is, perhaps, beyond the scope of the treatment in Wikipedia. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)T @ 20:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two characters missing From Charley Varrick cast 

message: When this flick was released in South Africa it had the title "Kill Charley Varrick" or "Kill Charlie Varrick".Captainbeefart (talk) 10:37, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kill Charley Varrick 
Talk:Telefon (film)

message: An interesting bit of tidbit about the actual novel, an important character not in the movie is a Russian "cleaner/assassin" named "Leon", which reminds me of of "Victor", the cleaner in La Femme Nikita, whose character was the basis for Leon, the Professional, both by Luc Besson.  See https://books.google.com/books?id=vorkBgAAQBAJ&q=leon#v=snippet&q=leon&f=false .  If somebody can please verify this who has also read the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.136.219.44 (talk) 23:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled