Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian music

message: The  Article has been re-done!! Music of Canada as of August 15, 2009 
It has taken some time ..but tks to the work of many people we have gotten Music of Canada well on it's way
Much more needs to be done...Pls fell free to Add relevant info (With proper References)!! But.. keep in mind we are trying to keep the article as wide-viewed as possible.. ..pls do not randomly list artist. (seeTalk:Music of Canada )
We have also taken the time to link the article to as much as possible, and added some banners to the discussions talk pages,,,and have Archived some Talk pages like Talk:Music of Canada/Archive 1 and Talk:Canadian rock/Archive 1.
Canadian music genres and Music of Canadian cultures  may need to be merged into one article maybe called Musical diversity in Canada or something what ever you think is proper..but they do need work. 
We are looking for writers on many sub topics like Canadian folk music and Canadian country music etc....See (Sandboxs post below this one)
Also we have taken the time to clean up Canadian rock...but it can always use some cultural topics.
O yes i am Back ....  
Buzzzsherman (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New main Article for Music of Canada 

message: (From Archive of past discussions)
I'm going to create some sandbox pages for the various genre sub-articles, filled in with basic outlines for expansion and development into articles:
* User:Bearcat/Canadian alternative rock
* User:Bearcat/Canadian country music
* User:Bearcat/Canadian folk music
Please offer any comments, and/or help to expand these. Bearcat 00:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sandbox pages

message: See Talk:Art Bergmann#Year of birth? - some assistance confirming dob would be welcome. Dl2000 (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Art Bergmann]] birth year dispute

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Hello,
Would Dean Lickyer qualify for this WikiProject? Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 04:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to the project. The article does fit this project's scope. However, it could use further work to support for the band's notability as described at WP:MUSIC. Dl2000 (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Member 

message: For any fans of James Gordon (Canadian musician), Casey Sheehan Didn't Die for Nothing and Weapons of Mass Instruction have been proposed for deletion.  Any further documentation, particularly in Canadian or other National newspapers would be appreciated. Pustelnik (talk) 00:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Casey Sheehan and Weapons of Mass Instruction

message: I recently boldly went through the Arcade Fire article and inserted a "the" in the band's name (depending on where it fit), per consensus at featured articles Pixies and Sex Pistols (though there is no established consensus yet at Arcade Fire). If anyone has comments on the matter, feel free to discuss at Talk:Arcade Fire#Arcade Fire / The Arcade Fire. Thanks, -M.Nelson (talk) 01:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the" Arcade Fire 

message: This is a notification of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums regarding the removal of reviews from the album infobox. The discussion has reached consensus to remove the reviews, though is still accepting further input into the matter. We are especially requiring more discussion on what steps to take next. Your input would be appreciated on what is a matter that will affect a lot of music articles. kiac. (talk-contrib) 09:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of reviews from the album infobox 

message: 
The portal has had a major upgrade in its look..I think we need to find a picture for the portal link....
Portal:Rush 
:Buzzzsherman (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rush portal

message: The featured/good article list was updated. Some new articles added, but Run to You (Bryan Adams song) was delisted from GA in June. Dl2000 (talk) 04:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated FA/FL/GA list

message: The article for the musical group Japandroids does not seem to me to meet WP:BAND.  It is followed with an article on their album Post-Nothing and now the Post-Nothing Tour.  Rather than Prod them of AfD them, maybe someone more familiar with music could have a look at them.  --KenWalker | Talk 08:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing heard after raising this here and on the three mentioned articles talk pages, I have proposed Japandroids for deletion.  --KenWalker | Talk 07:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe 24 hours is insufficient time to wait for a response.  The band was also nominated for a Juno Award on March 3rd, 2010.  Any request for deletion should no longer be considered.  --Anon 15:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Japandroids]] 

message: The Neil Young portal...Portal:Neil Young..........--->
</br>
The Celine Dion portal...Portal:Celine Dion..........--->
</br>
The Shania Twain portal...Portal:Shania Twain..........--->
</br>
The Bryan Adams portal...Portal:Bryan Adams..........--->
Pls add this to your watch list!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Buzzzsherman (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New portals to watch over for our group  

message: could i get someone to crop this in closer  so it can be nicer on  our portal page ...for some odd reason i cant do it maybe because its a pdf??.....Buzzzsherman (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah pdf's aren't images. So the only way you could do it would be to take a screen shot and then crop that, but that would completely kill the legibility of the pdf. -DJSasso (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tks man!! your fast!! Dame that is what i was thinking...best we leave it so people can download a nice copy...Buzzzsherman (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true at all.  You can take a screenshot and save it as a .png file.  Only Jpegs kill quality. Throwaway85 (talk) 02:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its ok we have decided on this look bellow ...With link to PDF file.......Buzzzsherman (talk) 19:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need help 

message: I was able to get someone to code  our new  music portal  into the 
So the portal will now appear in all Talk pages that have the template......... as of now there are 2,018 articles with the template
Template without |music=yes  Will still show the Canada portal
</br>
PS dont forget ....Portals are use to help readers and editors navigate vast topics. 
 on talk pages.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Buzzzsherman (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great news 

message: Ok guys i made us a User template...just so you can have a fast link to the project  on your user page</br>
...If you wish here it is → 
Buzzzsherman (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  User template  

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.
The two opposing positions which have the most support is:  
# supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
# opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect
Comments are welcome.  Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment. 
Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help. 
===Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people===
;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Question guys ..should we join this subscription ...Or let the Main Canada project deal wit this???Buzzzsherman (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like there is no response yet, it is very easy to set up, take two seconds, and you can save a lot of articles Ikip  21:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on Biographies of living people

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  05:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Question guys ..should we join this subscription ...Or let the Main Canada project deal wit this???Buzzzsherman (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like there is no response yet, it is very easy to set up, take two seconds, and you can save a lot of articles Ikip  21:58, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: There is currently a merger discussion at The Tragically Hip article about the band members own pages ...Please leave a comment if you like here...tks for your time!! ..Buzzzsherman (talk) 04:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Tragically Hip

message: Per Buzzzsherman request, I am trying to add your project to: 
:User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects
The newly created page will be here, when the bot is approved: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Canadian_music/Unreferenced BLPs
Okip   03:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding you to a bot

message: I have a question for all...does any one have suggestions for 2 more selected articles  for the portal i have added two new 5th selections see #1 here  one from a new GA article that our new member User:Timmeh did (Three Days Grace) and one that is in the process of a GA  See #2 here (Avril Lavigne) by a few members here. Was looking for 2 more  articles from  an older period , perhaps a composer or pianist..since the 2 new additions are from modern times. Was thinking Robert Nathaniel Dett or Murray Adaskin...Or a french artist...  i am just not sure about this time period and would like some help in picking 2 nice articles for the rotation.....Moxy (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a classical composer, but how about Skinny Puppy?  The WikiProject Industrial group has rated the article as Top...Argolin (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ok we can do that one its a nice article ..we just need to pic one more group or persons so i can start!!!..Moxy (talk) 16:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one else has answered your call, how about Michel Pagliaro?  Who you might say?  Pagliaro is from Montreal and has had considerable hits in both French and English.  Have a listen to "What The Hell I Got" and "Lovin' You Ain't Easy".   Forgive my weaslely use of considerable since the article needs a lot of work.Argolin (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

text: How about D.O.A.?  It has a start rating which may not be corrct:  perhaps C or B?  It has an importance=mid.  Again correctness?  I dont't know whether anyone from the Punk group has done anything.  They are punkers after all...Argolin (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Look for you --> Did you know?/15 and Did you know?/14..lets get that DOA article better referenced and we can add it to a main pic...Moxy (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Moxy that is great.  love the did you know thing.  Is there any reason it is limited to 15? Argolin (talk) 04:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

text: You may add as many as you like..i just pre did some to make it easy to do!! Lets up it to 25!!..Moxy (talk) 04:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I didn't know what that meant.  Do juno nominees count?  What about other Canadian award receipiants?  Argolin (talk) 20:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moxy, when you get a minitue, please join this conversation about the Juno Awards by year.  Argolin (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal question  

message: There has been a Portal upgrade to match the main Canada portal in  looks and function ..Portal:Music of Canada... Moxy (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Before:  After:  Nicely done, Moxy! Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Love the specific tasks to do; currently the unreferenced BLP's.  Argolin (talk) 02:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal upgrade 

message: FYI, :Category:Quebec record labels has been nominated for renaming. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 04:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Quebec record labels]]

message: This category has been nominated  for deletion. The Canadian music project's opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Argolin (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of [[:Category:Musical groups from Yukon]] 

message: Sorry that I missed your note when first removing the importance rating, but I still don't understand why it's there.  Once a category has been put in a super-category and has a link to its topic, it's done.  Nothing else needs to be done to those pages, so their importance ranking should be NA.  If you want to do anything else to them, you should be making a portal, not a category.  If you are concerned about the articles in the category, then you should advertise those articles by putting them in an "alert" or "current collaboration" section of this project page.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 01:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If no one comments on this in the next few days, I'm changing it back to NA importance.  Categories have no importance rating because nothing needs to be done to them.  If you want to add content to it, make a portal instead.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 18:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Artic Gnome I've been busy assessing the :Category:Unassessed Canadian music articles.  We now have zero articles in this category!  Also, I've been dealing with your concerns over placing an importance rating in categories.  Give me another few days.  I will answer you.  Argolin (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Congrats on the assessments, I always like to see the assessment tables inch closer to completion.  I appreciate that you want to draw attention to a category of articles that you're working on; my point is just that this is better done by putting a link to the category on the WikiProject page.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you can't wait for an answer.  lol So here ya go!  We're going to be boring the pants off of everyone! :) Yes, my point in assigning a top importance to the Categories was to draw the music project's attention to the missing prov/terr information.  After you posted your comment here, I linked the two "missing" categories to our project:
Category:WikiProject Canadian music
When I do assessments of articles, I generally edit it also.  There's always an infobox, categories, stub tab, etc to add to the article.  When doing them last week, I found myself having to think too hard about whether the article is a band or musician, then what did I name the cat?  Many articles last week were neither and could not be placed in the missing cat's.  I have asked those in the know whether the music project can have only one visible category linked to the above.  I'd like it named something along the lines of "Canadian music articles missing origin".  </br>
I was hoping to do all this work first (avoiding the post above).  Then post a message to you and the group on the new category.  Discussions on categories aren't necessarily big draws talk pages.  Oh well... see below plzArgolin (talk) 03:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't do much work with categories, but it looks like you have a good idea about how you want the categories set up.  You should add the wikiproject canadian music categorization tree on this page bellow the canadian music tree, and maybe add some prose to show what you're up to.  You'll be able to explain what you're doing a lot better there than you can by adding category importance to the WP:1.0 table.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the Wikiproject as a child of Canadian music a while back.  Technically, arguments can be made that it should be the other way around.  I've haven't seen any projects (music or other) set up like that.  I also added the Canadian music portal category as a sub/child of Canadian music.  So far, I've only seen Vancouver with a portal category.  I was going to notify the music project once I got an answer on the one main category for all Canadian music articles missing origin.  Argolin (talk) 22:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't proposing any change to how you're setting up the categories, I think you're doing fine.  I'm just saying that you should announce what work you're trying to get done on the Canadian music categories somewhere on the main WP:WikiProject Canadian music so that other people can contribute.  I'm still not exactly sure what you're trying to get done before marking categories as "finished".  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I thought those were old notices.  If you want to get all of the music articles tagged, make a list of every relevant category and show the list to WP:Bot requests.  They should be willing to add all of them for you.  I don't know much about category trees, so I have no comment there other than my old adage that non-content pages don't have importance rankings.  If you need a way to draw attention to non-content pages in the music project, I recommend having a prominent box for current goals at the top of the music page.  As for the unknown rating in the template, I don't mind doing it, but it's a big enough change that I think we should make sure there is consensus for the change first.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: AG, there was no consensus or discussion of any kind when someone at the Canada project removed the unknown rating.  IMO, there is no need for consensus or discussion to switch it back.  Quoted from above:  Again, any importance rating that may be assigned is completly 100% temporary non-permanent.  Argolin (talk) 23:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The unknown rating was only there for a few days due to an error on my part, the default is to sort by namespace; are you planning to go through all of the NA-class articles and change their classes?  I don't know whether anyone will volunteer their bot to do it given that things are already sorted into the right categories now.  Regarding the importance ratings, it should have only taken a couple days for a bot to tag the articles, and it was like that for more than a couple of days, so the designation didn't look temporary last time.  And in any case, even if it is temporary, why not do it right temporarily rather than do it wrong temporarily?  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 02:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance assessment of category pages 

message: Artic Gnome, while you're here, I'll tell you that yesterday I reassessed the Tragically Hip as high importance.  I'm telling you cause they are specifically listed on the Canada project's Template importance rating as an example of medium.  How can that be?  They are a quintessential Canadian band.  An execellent example of Canadian rock music.  I think the only Canadian music award that they have not been awarded is the GG.  Believe me when I tell you that it was not meant to annoy anyone at the Canada project. Please do not change it back to importance=Mid.
Shouldn't the Canadian music project be advising the Canada project on what bands/musicians to include on the Template:WikiProject Canada template and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/Assessment page?  Argolin (talk) 03:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Importance is very subjective, but it's probably reasonable to keep the Hip at high at least until the article is FA.  Keep in mind that the high-importance group contains articles like Prime Minister of Canada, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, and Winnipeg, all of which I would say are a higher priority than the Tragically Hip.  If there is too much of a conflict with importance ratings between WPCANADA and WPCANADA MUSIC, we can give the later its own importance ranking system like we did the cities.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Great:  Arctic.gnome please remove the reference to The Tragically Hip as "Mid" Importance  from Template:WikiProject_Canada#Importance.  Argolin (talk) 05:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tragically Hip [[Template:WikiProject_Canada#Importance]]

message: The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope.  There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 32,665 as of May 16.  A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both :Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.
Your Project's list can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian music/Unreferenced BLPs.  As of May 17 you have approximately 35 articles to be referenced, a 23.9% reduction from last week. Great work! The list of all other WikiProject UBLPs can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/WikiProjects. 
Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated.  If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page.  Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 17:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the notice...we are currently working on them we started with 56 and as you mentioned are down to 35....Moxy (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You might find it goes up tomorrow, as there were some Canadian music related ones listed at Wikipedia:Database_reports/Untagged_and_unreferenced_biographies_of_living_people that I assigned to the Canada and Canada music projects.  The important thing is that we are checking and referencing the articles.  Most of the music projects have been really good - with Opera and Metal leading the way having cleared their lists... so far.  We estimate that there are about 10,000 articles either without WikiProjects assigned, or just the Biography project and no work-groups or secondary projects. Thanks again for your efforts.The-Pope (talk) 18:40, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

text: WOw that many..we are lucky here...about 15 of the ones listed will most likely be deleted soon, as we are just waiting to see if they are notable!!..Moxy (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

text: UPDATE i have gone over most of them and have nominated many for deletion see -->Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 May 17 for more info....Moxy (talk) 19:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons 

message: David Bottrill discography  This record producer does not have a main article.  There is one (not particularly good) reference.  There is a hard redirect from David Bottrill to his discography.  I don't know what needs to be done.  Someone please help.  Argolin (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: per .  Argolin (talk) 02:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with an article in need of an assessment  

message: Alphabet Soup Children's Entertainment is a Winnipeg-based children's band. I've created an article for them, but am struggling a little to find a relevant Talk page to get a review from (and get rid of the "unreviewed" status).  If anyone here can take a look, or point me to a better page to make the request on, I'd be very grateful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Norepeat (talk • contribs) 02:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got it right.  The Canadian music project does not yet have an /Assessment page.  I added the Canada and Biography banner templates to the article's talk page.  The Biography project will eventually rate and assess the article.  They have a huge backlog.  With a little more content it will easliy qualify for a class=start article.  Hope this helps whomever you are!  Argolin (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Review request: Alphabet Soup 

message: The article about the band Staggered Crossing is under scrutiny and faces possible deletion. It's self-referenced but for a couple brief music reviews. There is next to nothing online. Can anyone help track down references to the band in local sources, such as hardcopy Toronto music press?  --Whoosit (stalk) 22:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with Hardcopy References 

message: Caribbean music in Canada needs some major work. As written, it seems to imply that the Caribbean music genre has really only existed in Canada since 2000 (which is absurd, obviously) and that it consists exclusively of soca and calypso. Like, hello — reggae? Zouk? Merengue? Lillian Allen? Leroy Sibbles? Sattalites? Hell, even Parachute Club had enough of a Caribbean influence going on to bear at least cursory mention. Anyone able to help get it up to scratch? Bearcat (talk) 02:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caribbean music 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Canadian music articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian music articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of :Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 21:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You rock!.  I've updated our project page to point to the Canadian music cleanup listings.  Argolin (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject cleanup listing 

message: After seeing Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/Popular pages i decided that we should make a portal for him so that more people might see the Canada music portal, thus getting us some views and perhaps some more editors. Moxy (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pls add [[Portal:Justin Bieber]] to your watchlist  

message: There has been some talk that this project should clearly see and be involved in - it has led to a proposal of sorts for a new category called  "POSTHUMOUS" for the Template:Infobox album ... Pls see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Posthumous albums: Studio vs Compilation.Moxy (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for new infobox: POSTHUMOUS ALBUM 

message: There is currently an RFC taking place at WT:CHARTS#Request for comment: Use of succession boxes. Interested parties are encouraged to participate. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 10:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC regarding use of succession boxes in song and album articles  

message: I didn't see a link on the Canadian music project page for "Request Assessment", or anything similar. I've done some editing, and if somebody could re-evaluate the article Andrew Scott (Canadian musical artist), for B-class, I'd surely appreciate it! Thanks! Boneyard90 (talk) 15:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moxy, I would have assessed it as class=Start?  I'm not questioning that the Andrew Scott article will pass the WP:NM, if challenged.  The article has only a single reference per WP:V.  Doesn't the fact that it may be challenged under WP:NM mean that it is class=Start?  Argolin (talk) 00:34, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can change it if you like...i am just not sure theres much more to be said...plus i am a little concern with notability.Moxy (talk) 01:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I won't argue with the C-class rating (other WikiProjects I've worked with didn't use the 'C' rating), or even the start-class if that's what you all decide. I'll dig around and see if there are other relevant and reliable sources to be had. Thanks! Boneyard90 (talk) 01:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One or two more references per WP:CITE would satisfy WP:V and prevent deletion of Andrew Scott per guidelines WP:NM.  Argolin (talk) 03:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moxy, I am not questioning your assessment of the Andrew Scott article.  I know that there is an enormus gap in finding online sources for Canadian content.  My question is are there Canadian Wikiproject guidelines to address this fact?  Argolin (talk) 03:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Re-assessment

message: was prodded for deletion. I deprodded it, but it needs some work. 64.229.101.119 (talk) 06:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Bye bye mon cowboy]]

message: Hello! This is magiciandude from the Latin American music task force requesting a collaboration between the two groups for an article. Fellow member Gariseiro has made a strong contribution to album, Mi Plan by Nelly Furtado, to achieve GA. Since the album is within both scopes, I think it would be benefit both groups to have it GA. Thanks! Magiciandude (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaborations 

message: Since early in 2010, many editors have assisted in the referencing or removal of over 90% of the Unreferenced Biographies of Living People,  bringing the total down from over 50,000 to the current 4,862 (as of 16:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ;Thank you for the reminder. We are doing pretty good here down to 63 ---> Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian music/Unreferenced BLPs.Moxy (talk) 16:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced BLPs - the final surge

message: Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Canadian music will have interest in putting on events related to women's roles in Canadian music; as performers, singers, etc. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiWomen's History Month 

message: There are large number of articles with requests for photographs of musicians in Canada. One of the categories they are placed in is that of their city of origin. This is however swamping other requests for photographs in that city. I would like to split these requests to make it easier for people to see what image requests of locations have been made. Someone has invested a substantial amount of time classifying these requests and I do not want to throw away that hard work. I have a proposal on how to do this. Comments requested at Template talk:WikiProject Canada#needs-photo=yes--Traveler100 (talk) 13:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo requests categories - request for input  

message: Please  see Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect Canadian related project talk pages.Moxy (talk) 17:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to redirect Canadian related project talk pages

message: There is a discussion occuring here regarding which music articles should be deemed vital to the Wikipedia project. Your input would be appreciated. GabeMc (talk|contribs)  21:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital articles 

message: The Cœur de pirate discography is currently at FLC. Please leave comments and feedback to get this discography to Featured List status. – Underneath-it-All (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cœur de pirate discography 

message: The article about Canadian musician Kellie Loder has an ongoing featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 03:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kellie Loder 

message: :Category:Canadian musicians missing province or territory, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for merging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Canadian musicians missing province or territory

message: You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles related to LGBT musicians may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2014|Wiki Loves Pride 2014]] 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: I have nominated Rush (band) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rush FAR 

message: You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride! 
* What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
* When? June 2015
* How can you help? 
*: 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
*: 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
*: 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! 
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa
(timestamp may not be accurate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Another Believer (talk • contribs) 15:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2015|Wiki Loves Pride]]! 

message: Women in Music	Women in Music
              	
60px|right|link=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women/Women_in_Red
*10 to 31 January 2016 
*Please join us in the worldwide virtual edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red.
--Ipigott (talk) 10:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music

message: Hi all,
We are a group of music librarians, archivists, musicians and academics. We're organizing a national editing campaign focused on Canadian music. We're going to have several events culminating in a distributed edit-a-thon in Oct. 2017. We'd love to collaborate with this project and would welcome volunteers. We don't have a project page up yet, but we're applying for a Wikimedia grant to help fund some of the activities and you can read about it here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Project/Music_in_Canada_@_150:_A_Wikipedia_and_Wikidata_Project  We welcome and comments and suggestions.
--Smallison (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  National campaign on music in 2017 

message: A discussion regarding the above topic at Talk:John Vickers (disambiguation)#Requested move 18 February 2017 may be of interest. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 21:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Jon Vickers the [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]] of the disambiguation page on which his name appears?

message: Hello, WikiProject Canadian Music! I have nominated this discography for WP:FL (you can find it here) and the review seems to have stalled. May I please ask that anyone interested please take a few moments to review it and leave comments and support for its promotion? It would be greatly appreciated and I would be happy to reciprocate if you have anything under review that needs commenting. Thank you! — Miss Sarita 14:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Theory of a Deadman discography]] 

message: Hello,Please note that Paul Anka, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    10:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    10:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages...--Moxy 🍁 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Hi, I would like to notify the wikiproject that there's currently an RFC underway at Talk:Justin Bieber#RFC: Describing Bieber as to how to describe the talents of Justin Bieber. Your participation is welcome.--NØ 10:37, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justin Bieber RFC 

message: Waking up the neighbours is at GAR if anyone from this project is interested in working on it, see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Waking Up the Neighbours/1 Aircorn (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waking up the neighbours 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]] 

message: There is a discussion on the article's talk page regarding the band either ending in 2015 or 2018. Some opinions would be helpful to see if a full consensus can be given. The topic is Talk:Rush (band)#Lifeson confirming 2015 end. Thanks. HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Rush (band)]] regarding end of band