Talk:Bloody Mary (South Park)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed another link  which while not youtube, appears to be showing parts of the episode in violation of copyright. If I made a mistake and the site has permission to show these segments, you're welcome to re-add it but please mention here the evidence that the site has permission Nil Einne 14:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: I think that this article, since it is highly controversial and offensive, that this article should not be here. PLEASE consider it. This article has no place in an encyclopedia that hopes to be half ways decent. Thank you DevoutCatholic 03:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry man, not only is that never going to happen with the rules in place on this site, but I have to disagree with you on the idea to begin with. I too consider myself a devout Catholic, and the whole idea of this episode makes my blood boil, but Wikipedia is here to document such things, no matter how distasteful or downright disgusting they may be. -- Grandpafootsoldier 07:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would the article be deleted because its controversial?  Just because it hurts your feelings it should be removed?  That is like me saying the article on sex should be removed because kids might see it. 72.93.158.106 19:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to make it look like that we're all ganging up on you, DevoutCatholic, but please see WP:NOT#CENSOR - Wikipedia is not censored under fear that it is controversial or offensive, so I'm afraid you will have to live with it. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 10:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

text: While I wouldn't call them fascist, I'd suggest looking up the definition of the word encyclopedia. The episode indeed has an extremely positive message and I don't think it is too blasphemous, the point was to ridicule the so called "miracles" related to statues crying/bleeding (which has been ridiculed in a lot of different shows)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.42.43 (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: deletion

message: There is a visitor behind Stan's dad, when he is sitting in the car and explaining to Stan about the virgin Mary. I think this should mentioned in the article.. perhaps put the trivia section back up? I'm not doing it myself, bacause a) I don't know how to add a new section, as I don't normally edit stuff here, and b) my English is somewhat poor, as I am foreign.
:WP:WELCOME is useful to the first problem, if you don' know how to add a new section. However, I added this a while ago, but then the problem of Trivia arises - Trivia, including stuff like this is somewhat irrevelvant and unencyclopedic - as interesting as either you or I may find it. See WP:TRIVIA for more info. ≈ The Haunted Angel 10:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Visitors are already mentioned in the list of fictional South Park species, there's supposedly one in every episode.Alastairward (talk) 13:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visitor 

message: Why'd he get into a wheelchair and shave his head? I assumed it was a parody of some movie, but was it more like Howie Mandel and Britney Spears who suddenly developed severe germophobia and shaved their heads?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 04:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypochondriacal behavior? 

message: The article is now linked to "20th Century Persecutions of the Catholic Church"? I'm not a Catholic, but I can understand how a devout Catholic might be offended, but "persecution"? If that's the case, then "Trapped in the Closet" was an example of persecution of Scientologists, and "Butt Out" was persecution of non-smokers. Maybe I'm being overly technical, but shouldn't there be some agreed-upon definition of persecution--like something that causes palpable harm to people based on their identity? In any event, I just don't see how a cartoon episode rises to the level of job discrimination or tar and feathering people.--mcglotda 21:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right.  Other things under the topic include massacres and laws.  This doesn't belong, and I'm editing the article to reflect that.  Zelmerszoetrop (talk) 00:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: It is related to the issue of Anti-Catholicism, in a cultural way, so I did add it to that category. Also I'm looking for things against Anti-Catholicism to make the category more balanced and clearer.--T. Anthony (talk) 07:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Really?

message: I have removed the section in the opening of the article that states: "In the audio commentary Trey Parker states he somewhat regretted making this episode more than 'Trapped in the Closet' due to the excessive controversy surrounding it". I listend to the audio commentary three times after reading this and, at no point, does Parker make such a statement. Parker does talk about how Comedy Central convinced Parker and Stone to let them pull the episode and how they regretted not kicking up a stink because it then led to Scientologists saying "Well if the Catholics can get an episode pulled, why can't we?" and this all took place at the same point they were telling Issac Hayes that they wouldn't pull 'Trapped in the Closet' because it sets a precedent for anyone else to complain who is even mildly offended by something on this show. They also talk, very briefly, about how this became the basis for the 'Cartoon Wars Parts 1 and 2' and how the issue of censorship also surrounded those episodes. But at no point do either Parker or Stone state they regretted making the episode at all. Please don't return this to the article until you can find a truthful source. 78.144.245.38 (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Erroneus Info

message: "Feast of the Immaculate Collection" should be "Feast of the Immaculate Conception", obvious in the very article it links to. I'm making this edit, and nobody should have a problem with that. It's a self-explanatory edit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.26.80.68 (talk) 02:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  just making an edit known here on the discussion page before someone gets their panties in a bunch 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bloody Mary (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060825194309/http://www.cathnews.com:80/news/602/92.php to http://www.cathnews.com/news/602/92.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bloody Mary (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3570043a1869,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060813150807/http://www.bsa.govt.nz:80/pressreleases/2006-06-30.htm to http://www.bsa.govt.nz/pressreleases/2006-06-30.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Bloody Mary (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070718164613/http://www.catholicleague.org/05press_releases/quarter%204/051208_south_park.htm to http://www.catholicleague.org/05press_releases/quarter%204/051208_south_park.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426221954/http://www.boingboing.net/2006/01/09/south_park_bloody_ma.html to http://www.boingboing.net/2006/01/09/south_park_bloody_ma.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060427031803/http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0%2C1%2C18055%2C00.html?tnews to http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0%2C1%2C18055%2C00.html?tnews
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0%2C2106%2C3570043a1869%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bsa.govt.nz/pressreleases/2006-06-30.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060101085401/http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/south-park/bloody-mary-episode-ensures-south-park-guys-a-bungalow-in-hell-145774.php to http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/south-park/bloody-mary-episode-ensures-south-park-guys-a-bungalow-in-hell-145774.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified