lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:For My Broken Heart

message: This whole section appears to be a collection of made up numbers. Two references are provided for the singles but neither backs up claimed positions.  The Canadian Country chart has been deprecated - see WP:CHARTS for confirmation.  Instead of replacing unreferenced material and removing cite needed tags please provide references in WP:reliable sources if they do exist or allow the information to be removed. noq (talk) 17:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales Chart positions 
Talk:Thy Mighty Contract

message: "The album is considered a microcosm of the band's entire discography, with emphasis on both the raw and unrefined direction of their demos/EP's (Satanas Tedeum, Passage To Arcturo) and also the dark, melodic and atmospheric direction of later releases."
This sentence is silly; says who? how can it be considered a microcosm of releases which came out after? original research/citation needed/blahblahblah/get rid of it. --81.106.115.91 (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and removed it. --217/83 07:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Indian Ink

message: Current variations of indian ink:
* Indian Ink, a disambiguation page linking to Indian Ink (play) and Indian Ink (art) (article doesn't exist).
* Indian ink, an article about the ink.
* Indian Ink (play), an article about the play.
* India ink, a redirect to Indian ink.
I think Indian Ink, a disambiguation page, should instead be a redirect to Indian ink since it differs only in capitalization.  To offset the removal of the disambiguation page, I've added disambiguation top links to Indian ink and Indian Ink (play).  I do not think a full-blown disambiguation page is necessary.
The old disambiguation page has been moved to Indian Ink/disambiguation.  It can be moved to Indian Ink (disambiguation) is anyone believes it necessary.
--Ryanrs 04:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation / Redirect 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indian Ink/disambiguation. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  DannyS712 (talk) 06:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indian Ink/disambiguation" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Long Valley, New Jersey

message: It can't be 97% white and 94% Asian. Where do we find this census they're talking about?
:Page had been vandalized to change 0.94% Asian to 94.6%. Article was corrected. In the future, remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) so that your comment can be readily identified as yours. Alansohn 04:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census data error?
Talk:Susan Page

message: Can somebody add something about the vice presidential debates? Source:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54003441 BSMIsEditing (talk) 10:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been done. = paul2520 💬 00:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 debates Comment
Category talk:Dependent territories in Oceania

message: Why, pray tell, is the Federated States of Micronesia listed here?  Despite its "associated state" status, the FSM is an independent nation.  Same goes for Palau.  I attempted to delete the items, but I'm not wiki-savvy enough to figure this one out.  Any help here would be hot. ;-)
Mike Beidler 05:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable items
Talk:Nestlé Purina PetCare

message: I am affiliated with the article-subject and have a disclosed COI. I noticed the current article, under History/Legal issues has two redundant sentences referring to the same lawsuit:
In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Purina, claiming that the dog food manufactured by the company was hazardous for pets.
 
Later in that section the page states:
In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Purina. It alleged that the company's Beneful brand of dog food contained toxic ingredients. Purina said these ingredients were FDA-approved.
They both seem to be referring to the same lawsuit. I suggest keeping the second one and trimming the first sentence, as the second reference to the lawsuit has more detail and better sources. CorporateM (Talk) 12:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: *I've removed the first mention of this and kept the second mention. But I removed the claim from Purina that these ingredients are FDA approved. The mycotoxins are produced by mold found in grains. It is this toxin — and not the grain itself — which is being blamed for the pet illnesses.   Spintendo  04:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 2-APR-2019

message: The current article-text states:
In 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Purina alleging that the company's Beneful brand of dog food contained toxins produced by mold found in grains — grain being a major ingredient in Beneful.[35][36]
It seems to flow logically that the article should include the fact that the case was dismissed. Can we add something like the following?
The lawsuit was later changed to a claim of false advertising rather than harm to pets, but eventually all claims against Nestlé Purina were dismissed by the court.
CorporateM (Talk) 19:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I added more info to clarify what happened, with a better non-adblock-blocked source. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Action
Talk:Anne Heche

message: Why does the opening paragraph state she won multiple Emmy awards but the list of Awards and Nominations only lists one Emmy win? 2600:1010:B1AF:978B:D80E:4AA4:6110:9DDB (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmys 

message: Are there results of her car inspection? – because there are known "Mini Cooper Acceleration Stumble Issues". 46.114.38.222 (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  accident as technical issue
Talk:Midian (album)

message: Does anyone know what the number 58 ot the letters E.H. stands for? Midian is 58:58 sec long (the article says 58:56 but my CD-player shows 58:58), and in the booklet the letters EH appear in the sentence "Cradle of Filth MM EH". I suppose MM is 2000 and since the record is from that year, i guess EH stands instead of A(nno)D(omini). But what does it mean? Could it have something to to with Lovecraft or Clive Barker's Cabal/Nightbreed? 81.216.34.170 16:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think 58 has any significance.  My CD player has it at 58:58 too, but my computer makes it 58:51.  Whatever - it's just how long the album is.  Nothing occult.  MM is certainly 2000, and all the Cradle albums have the date with EH after it, so it's not just exclusive to Midian.  As for what it means..  I'm intrigued!  I'd never noticed before.  I've been trying to find out, but I've not had any success so far.  My only initial thought is that it might be Ecce Homo (which has resonance with both the crucifiction and Nietszche), but I'll keep looking...  Cardinal Wurzel 23:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe 58 means nothing, but I just figured since E is the 5th letter of the alphabet and H is the 8th (EH=58), maybe they had something to do with each other... 81.216.34.170 19:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 58/EH

message: Why does this article not mention the bands albums personell?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.126.189 (talk) 03:03, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  personell? 

message: In Italian: Amore e Morte; in Latin: Amor et Mortis; in Portuguese: Amor e Morte.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.151.146 (talk) 03:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amor e Morte 
Talk:Vempire… or Dark Faerytales in Phallustein

message: This album's name is not "Vempire... or Dark Faerytales in Phallustein". Instead, it has two acceptable names. One is "V Empire", and the other is "Dark Faerytales in Phallustein".
If you'll notice the artwork on the CD, there's clearly a space between the 'V' and the 'E'. Additionally, the official discography lists this album's name as "V Empire", with a "subtitle" of "Dark Faerytales in Phallustein".
Perhaps the article could be worded something like
:V Empire (also known as Dark Faerytales in Phallustein)...
Cparker 15:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Name
Talk:Electoral district of Albury

message: According to the Parliamentary Record (Volume VII):
* Thomas Hunter Griffith was an independent his entire time. -- Newhoggy | Talk 05:20, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections there. We've started splitting them in other states already - it makes sense. The lists come from the New South Wales Parliamentary Record, which has lists of members for every electorate in NSW history. :) Ambi 02:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  So did you need to make deductions on things such as whether or not Lib. stood for Commonwealth Liberal Party, or Liberal Party of Australia based on the date?  Thanks -- Newhoggy | Talk 08:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The copy of the Parliamentary report I have says Thomas was Independent for both his terms.  Is the Progressive Party claim accurate?  Thanks -- Newhoggy | Talk 06:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Griffith
Talk:Mika Bomb

message: This article reads like a P.R. release from the band's manager.  I'm going to try and make it a bit more objective.
I don't want to quibble, but I'm pretty sure that this band should be considered more Japanese than Chinese... that's what it says on their myspace and in most of the articles that I could find on the net.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.239.42 (talk) 09:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Papa Bouba Diop

message: There is some idiot who keeps coming here and changing the word 'papa' to 'pape' in the man's name, getting rid of the fulham link and adding ridiculous claims like that one about some swedish band called penis. you are a vandal - please stop it!
:Well, I'm not sure that changing the name was vandalism, in fact a lot of sources list him as Pape Bouba Diop, including the external link in the article. --Adolar von Csobánka (Talk) 20:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's a Senegal 0-1 WIN not "defeat" against France" 109.242.203.97 (talk) 01:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It says France was defeated.  RudolfRed (talk) 03:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

text: I agree with RudolfRed, the use of the term "defeated" seems appropriate as they were the reigning world champions. It is a commonly used term and I don't see a reason to make the change. If you have additional support for your argument, please let us know. Jurisdicta (talk) 20:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2020
Talk:N-dimensional space

message: Is there some other non-mathematical meaning to "n-dimensional"? If so, could it be included in this definition? I have just read the following sentence: "Everyone is impressed--or should be--by the n-dimensionality of literary works, and we are always developing tools to analyze how they work, to help us think about them critically." What does n-dimensional mean here? I came to wikipedia because I thought I could figure it out. No luck. Can someone help by adding a more general, less technical meaning in the first paragraph? --Girl2k (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common sense meaning of "n-dimension"? 

message: Agree. After High-dimensional space how many of these pages are there? Higher dimension has more in it but the same argument applies: it's conceptually much the same as N-dimensional space, as the point of studying "n dimensions" is really to study dimensions > 3, as dimensions 1, 2 and 3 are very well understood. I can't see anything that couldn't be merged here. --John Blackburne (words ‡ deeds) 15:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[higher dimension]] 

message: I don't see how n-dimension space could be important in understanding a statistical test. I am not saying they aren't related, but I don't understand how and the relationship should at least be briefly explained if it is going to be mentioned.--69.245.43.212 (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of chi-squared tests 

message: To all concerned: the main page has mentioned N-dimensional space is being considered for merging into the dimension and euclidean space, and this has been up for over a year, and the discussion appears (to me) to mostly be on the side of questioning why this page exists.  Is it time now to simply replace this page with an appropriate redirect?   My preference would be to replace the content of the N-dimensional space page with a redirect to dimension.  Rybu (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that does seem the appropriate target. I can't see any point in having this as a separate article the contents do not match with Euclidean space which was the other merge prospect mooted. Dmcq (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree! Agree! Mgnbar (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Okidokie.  If there's serious disagreement the edit can be reverted.  I'll put in the re-direct now.  There, done. Rybu (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge discussions 

message: Would a better redirect target be Real coordinate space? Loraof (talk) 17:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target of redirect
Talk:Ben Fouhy

message: This page is misspelled — it should be "Ben Fouhy". --222.152.210.111 05:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Washington Star

message: I removed the following, posted by 69.143.14.63:
:In the 1960's Earl George Douglas I became the first African American route manager for The Evening Star Newspaper, which enabled him to employ and mentor many young kids growing up in poverty stricken areas of Washington, DC.
:: I ran a google search and found no such information.  So the sentence seems unverifiable, something against wikipedia's policy for inclusion in articles.  John Broughton 05:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in all fairness, perhaps the contributor grew up in the Washington area and has personal knowledge of that fact which may have been well known at some point, particularly if he was one of those newsboys himself.  The Internet is a finite set of knowledge which probably contains little information on route managers of the Evening Star decades ago.Tom Cod 08:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Earl George Douglas I

message: There's a lecture that Walt Whitman used to give after the Civil War in memory of Lincoln in which he described how he first became aware of Lincoln's assasination upon seeing it headllined in an edition of the Evening Star while walking down a street in Washington in 1865.  It truly was a sad day when the paper went out of business.  One can still see the old Star building, constructed in 1898, on Pennsylvania Avenue not too far from the Willard Hotel.Tom Cod 08:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Walt Whitman and the Evening Star

message: We have created a social network on Blogger.  Our URL is: http://washingtonstaralum.blogspot.com/.
See also: Washington Star People 
January 2010 - We have added a group on Facebook  Search: Washington Star / Washington Evening Star / Washington Star-News  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.31.254 (talk) 08:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Washington Star Alumni Social Network

message: Is there an archive somewhere, hopefully online, where one can access, even for a fee, back issues of the Star?  Recently I wrote an article on Wikipedia about a certain local DC newstory from the early 70s (Richard Mattingly Murder Case) in which I was aided by the ability to access back issues of the Post online for a fee.  I was hampered, however, by the inability to access corresponding issues of the Star, which is unfortunate because I think the Star initially broke the story and had more extensive coverage. Tom Cod (talk) 19:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Archive?
Talk:Renae Lawrence

message: Why say, "Lawrence was allegedly discovered" when she's been convicted? Can't one say, "Lawrence was discovered" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.0.58.18 (talk • contribs) 
:I've fixed that. It's a very recent event and her conviction is merely hours old. -- Longhair 05:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Valentine (film)

message: This is pathetic.Actors,Trivia but no Plot!Come on people WAKE UP!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.167.131.106 (talk • contribs) 
:Mmm, how about waking up yourself and contributing such a section? (Saying that, is there actually a plot to write about?) The JPS talk to me 20:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The plot summary includes the comment "(this is not possible as Adam has given no indication that he may be Jeremy)" - this doesn't look like part of the plot, but as a commentary to me. -- Beardo (talk) 13:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible OR 
Talk:Robert Hoyzer

message: If this is a case of copyright violation, it's The Peninsula violating Wikipedia's copyright. The Peninsula published its article on December 26, 2005. This Wikipedia article is much older and it seems that its content was copied by The Peninsula. -- Robert Weemeyer 05:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If there is suspision that a newspaper etc. has copied articles (complete) from wikipedia shouldn't wikipedia investigate the case. Even though there is no real copyright on wikipedia, there is the simple curtesy that one puts a work cited on papers, etc. in which one cited wikipedia. 
I think that Wikipedia should be getting an excuse from the Peninsula and to be quite frankly speaking I have found at least one other article that the Peninsula has stolen from another page.
(Great Job of writing own Artilces on the Peninsulas side and why doesn't wikipedia stand up for its right?)
Krazygermanbuddy 03:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright 
Talk:T. O. Morrow

message: You're probably going to have to remove the who's who image, you have two others so it should be okay. --Basique 22:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's Who image

message: Why was it removed?
Who's Who images have been deemed to not be fair use. CovenantD 03:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I should have included an edit summary - sometimes that Return key just works itself :) CovenantD 18:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: The current lede includes the following:T. O. Morrow is a fictional character ... usually referred to as "T.O. Morrow", a play on the word "tomorrow".
Obviously, the character has a full first and second name, without initialisation.  Maybe even more than those two.  Which is fine to express in the article.
But to say "T. O. Morrow is referred to as 'T. O. Morrow'" is not really helpful to anyone.  --88.104.39.55 (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name fix required 

message: That is clearly an image of Doctor Sivana. -- MrBlonde267 (talk) 06:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing that out. I apparently had a major brain fart when I uploaded the picture, mislabeled it, and put it into article of an incorrect character. I've removed the picture from the article and marked the picture for deletion.--Rockfang (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: False picture
Talk:Hanif

message: Please provide a source for the idea that Musaylimah was known as a "Hanif". This page is in the category of Islamic pages (see subtitle for page: Islamic belief) and will give the Islamic meaning as the primary one. The information added by Bulgarios (talk) has been relegated to a second paragraph.
:there is no source. The source given don't support that. I have added this page to my watchlist. I will try improving the article in the meantime.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Banu Hanifa tribe and Hanif are totally different things. LOL.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Musaylimah as Hanif (?)

message: Hello all, 
Is there a good reason why we should include that there's a solid chance that Abraham and Ishmael never existed? It seems like an odd detail that's not very relevant to the article itself.
Cahmad25 (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  necessity of including that abraham and ishmael might have not existed  

message: I don't actually know Arabic, but I think it's weird that the article states the plural as "hunafa" and then continues to use the anglicised form "hanifs". I would change it, but I'm new to editing and I don't know if it's a good change. DogWithHerpes (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  stylistic: change "hanifs" to "hunafa", the Arabic plural
Talk:Maximum term method

message: A typical distribution in statystical mechanics (say velocity in direction x) is exponential p(v)~exp(-Kv) that makes the maximal term proportional to logarithm of M, not the exponent of M.
At any rate we need a rigorus formulation of the theorem. abakharev 05:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gilles de Rais (Castlevania)

message: Cornell's fight with Dracula, despite looking EXACTLY like the fake de Rais "Dracula" in Reinhardt and Carrie's quests, is suppose to be the real deal? What a way to make things confusing, Konami. I suppose they left him in like that so that they could keep the traditional style Dracula battle in there. Maybe some more mention of this should be thrown in the article. Buzda 05:41, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think the idea is that years after Dracula's defeat by Cornell, de Rais knew how to pattern himself after the Count to fool anyone who might interfere. (If you notice, quirks do shine through. Gilles de Rais is associated with red/fire while Dracula uses blue fire/electricity.) But yeah, I plan on fully explaining the story’s peculiarities (perhaps with a timeline) on the C64/LoD pages... eventually. Guermantes 06:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! You've done a great job maintaining these CV64 related articles. Buzda 09:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Melbourne/Buildings

message: On the assumption that articles are required for the top 20 Tall buildings and all other buildings and structures listed in the categories on the project page, I calculate that to be about 185 articles. If we further assume that this is about 75% of articles, then the total should be about 250 articles in this section on Buildings, structures and landmarks.
On that basis we have 46 articles complete, 39 over 50% complete, 30 with some content and 135 which do not exist. This approximates to 32% complete.
Eric. Cuddy Wifter 05:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Progress Calculation

message: On the assumption of 250 articles required in Buildings, Structures and Landmarks, we have 49 complete, 67 are over 50% complete, 63 have some content and 71 have not been started.  - Cuddy Wifter 02:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Progress update at 2 September, 2006
Talk:Demon Accident

message: This article is just a couple paragraphs.  Maybe there's more to say, maybe not.  If there is more to say: what's already here and a "see main article" link would work on the coaster's page.  If not, this should really be folded (back?). Johndodd 05:49, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there was no objection, I went ahead and performed the merger. Johndodd 23:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)