lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of freshwater aquarium plant species

message: This is a very useful page but a lot of the names used are aquarium trade names and are often forms of the main type. There are a number of examples in this list but I noticed particularly Echinodorus and Hygrophila. As part of the Wikiplants project I am revising a lot of the aquatic plants on Wikipedia but it is difficult to link some of them here. Hermeswiki
:I agree, there are several names in the list that are actually synonyms (in addition to those mentioned above, Cryptocoryne is another case in point), some plants (like Aglaonema) are not useable as aquarium plants at all (although they are indeed sold as that very often, but they die after having been immersed for some time), and the list is far from complete, of course. Lots of work needed here. --Crusio (talk) 09:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of acts of the Parliament of England from 1660

message: Please see the talk page at Talk:List of Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliament, 1801-1819 for current discussion of possible changes to the lists for both British and English legislation.  Silverhelm 09:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of older details and general formatting 

message: The names Charles and James are abbreviated "Car." and "Jac." respectively, for their Latin forms "Caroli" and "Jacobi". "Cha.", "Chas." and "Ja." are not in the citations given here. Note also that "William & Mary" is abbreviated either as "W. & M." (in tables, where space is at a premium) or "Gul. & Mar." (in headers) in Statutes of the Realm. Hairy Dude (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an extremely outdated form of citation that is no longer used. Modern publications use Cha. and Ja. Theknightwho (talk) 12:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

text: @ I have updated the reference to a modern edition of the Chronological Tables using my own hard copy, for the sake of providing a reference for the modern form of citation. This isn't available online, however. Is there a generally accepted format for linking to an older edition, when the cited edition is not available? It would be a shame to lose that Google Books link. Theknightwho (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @ Thanks for the information. There's no form for citing multiple editions that I know of, but there's nothing really stopping you from just citing them both, since they're both acceptable. (Maybe add a hidden comment explaining why.) Hairy Dude (talk) 02:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles and James
Talk:La Campana National Park

message: I'm not totally sure, but it seems there's a lot of overlap between this page and La Campana-Peñuelas, so I think it could be merged here. A page for Lago Peñuelas National Reserve doesn't yet exist. (See Protected areas of Chile for the main listing.) - Ruodyssey (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bridle of Constantine

message: User:Str1977 has methodically gone through articles included in the :Category:Christian mythology removing them. This article was one of those removed.Perhaps not in the interests of the non-indoctrinated Wikipedia reader? I have no opinion in this particular case myself. --Wetman 09:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Christian mythology]]?

message: I'm puzzled what Socrates, who was already dead centuries before Jesus was born, is doing telling stories about what happened after Jesus died. The Storm Surfer 20:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socrates?
Talk:Gospel of Nicodemus

message: User:Str1977 has methodically gone through articles included in the :Category:Christian mythology removing them. This article was one of those removed.Perhaps not in the interests of the non-indoctrinated Wikipedia reader? I have no opinion in this particular case myself. --Wetman 09:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Christian mythology]]?

message: "(writing c. 325), ..... "We are forced to admit that [the Christian Acts of Pilate] is of later origin, and scholars agree in assigning it to the middle of the fourth century."  "
DOES NOT MAKE SENSE - HOW CAN HE WRITE AT THE BEGINING OF 4TH CENTURY THAT THE ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN MID 4TH CENTURY. Time lines are wrong somewhere  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.231.178.239 (talk) 18:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timescale not possible in the article 

message: In the intro we are told:
"The section about Pilate is an older text found in the Greek Acts of Peter and Paul and is a purported official document from Pontius Pilate (or composed from reports at the praetorium at Jerusalem) reporting events in Judea to Emperor Tiberius, and referring to the crucifixion of Jesus, as well as his miracles."
But latter on we are told "An appended text purports to be a written report made by Pontius Pilate to Claudius" and the reference shows it is Emperor Claudius ie no earlier then 41 CE.
So which is it?  Emperor Tiberius (d 37 CE) or Emperor Claudius (41 CE)?--216.31.124.15 (talk) 04:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiberius or Claudius? 

message: A previous version claimed (without citation) that this work was written by a member of "The Order of Nicodemus", whereas the name of the work comes from the belief that the text was in large part a copy of a Hebrew original written by Nicodemus, an associate of Jesus from The Gospel of John. This title was given to the work in the Middle Ages. Furthermore, there seems to be no source for deriving the title from any association with this supposed order; "The Order of Nicodemus" appears nowhere in the lists of monastic orders, and simply seems to be completely made up! This has now been replaced with the truth (and citation).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.76.23.158 (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I can find no evidence that an "Order of Nicodemus" ever existed. Daask (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The Order of Nicodemus?
Talk:Conguillío National Park

message: What is the difference between national and nationalistic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.174.114.43 (talk) 10:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the difference between national and nationalistic?
Talk:Billy Thermal

message: Whichever editors are working on this page, please note that it is lacking in content and requires more information. I've googled this band and Steinberg, so I know that they *are* notable. However other editors might not.
*Please include relevant links
*Please include more details about their songs and rankings
Might make this a project of my one. Efren,over to you! ;)xCentaur |  talk   09:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content

message: Would be prudent to mention what genre of music this band plays (Pop? Soul?). Then this article can be added to the relevant WikiProject as well. -- œ™ 21:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:The Haunted Storm

message: Why does this article appear in the 1923 Novels category? Curious, seeing as it was written in '72... Maybe there's another Haunted Storm, which may have actually been written in 1923, that's been confused with this one. Grazi, Demosthenes 1 22:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1923?
Talk:NZNOG

message: Trying to understand how this article is queried for Notability. 
The NZNOG is a well established entity that has legitimate interest, is comparible to the NANOG.
I submitted much of the info to the article, as a contributor to NZNOG for some years.
The existance and function of the group can be verified through the media; search http://www.computerworld.co.nz for NZNOG for an example.
The newly updated website @ http://www.nznog.org is a work in progress for their 2007 conference.
So whats the deal?   - BlakJakNZ 10:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Now submitted for deletion - despite noone having posted any comments in response to the above, posted 6 months ago.. 
... do we have to cite a bunch of search results to prove we're notable?
*InternetNZ Councillor notes NZNOGs significance
*Fijian Government Representative cites NZNOG attendance.
*Conference reported in Computerworld Magazine
If links to citations like these are built in, will this satisfy the Wikipedia editors-that-be?
Comments welcomed. BlakJakNZ 03:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  An afterthought; ive deleted the 'delete' suggestion (which was, for the record: 
-- "no indication of how this group meets WP:CORP nor that they have been written about by publishers independent of the group"
I see merit in citing some references, but I don't see anyone making similar suggestions of NANOG's article. NZNOG and NANOG are very similar. I would suggest adjustments to the article, not deletion. BlakJakNZ 05:24, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: here we go again
Talk:Maximino Ávila Camacho

message: I suppose the fact he was a corrupt murderer who had dealings with pro Nazi sympathisers such as the Swedish millionaire Wenner-Gren and Edward VII Duke of Windsor while they were in the Bahamas during the War involving the secret transfer of cash is not worth putting into this article? I just don't know why Wikipedia doesn't call a spade a spade and covers up for atrocious crimes committed on the political Right while going at length in its articles to criticise the crimes of the Left in detail and depth. Or do I? 2A02:C7C:E0AC:3200:F1C1:D722:C52C:FA93 (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruthless murderer
Talk:Tatars of Romania

message: This is a ethnic group, like the Lipka Tatars, it will be correctly to use Dobrujan Tatars. Zolgoyo (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , this changes the scope of the article. This article is only about Tatars in Romania. Then there's also Crimean Tatars in Bulgaria. Super Ψ Dro 20:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This article seems to be for the whole Dobruja, but historical it was also Romania, so it should to be OK. Zolgoyo (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 June 2023 

message: * Deputatii au dat navala sa apere Ziua tatarilor
There is no Tatars in Romania, but Crimean Tatars.--195.110.6.24 (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Oare ne vom opri vreodata din a ne asimila cultural? Sau vom ramane un popor extinct, recunoscut ca un neam de, nici tătari, nici turci. Unde este identitatea noastră ca popor? Limba tătară provine din regiunea Altai, de unde provine și a lor. Imperialismul Turcilor nu a beneficiat cultural pe nimeni. Ei vor să fugi un maraton cu steagul turciei in spate, dar ei nu vor flutura steagul cu Tamğaua Taraq pe ea. Haideți sa lăsăm Pan-Turcismul pentru amatori pasionati, și ca neam să ne însușim identitatea Tătărească. Gireydevlet (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Turco-Tătari”
Talk:Bagby Hot Springs

message: Willamette Week's last issue reviews Bagby: http://wweek.com/editorial/3433/11149/ -Pete (talk) 03:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More recent article 

message: *https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/bagby_hot_springs/#.WT9HYhiZNo4 ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Joe Hatten

message: Cleaned this up a little and added some links. Jotts Ryderbeck 10:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Sganeshkumar 1989

message: Category:	1
Mainspace	421
Talk:	224
User talk:	48
User:	119
Wikipedia:	37
avg edits per article	2.94
earliest	10:48, 2 March 2006
number of unique articles	289
total	850
2006/3 	186 	
2006/4 	60 	
2006/5 	115 	
2006/6 	125 	
2006/7 	12 	
2006/8 	7 	
2006/9 	13 	
2006/10 	69 	
2006/11 	222 	
2006/12 	41
For upto the minute information, go here. riana_dzasta 10:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing information for {{user|Sganeshkumar 1989}}
Talk:Cefuroxime

message: IUPAC Name should be:
(6R,7R)-3-[(carbamoyloxy)methyl]-7-{[(2E)-2-(furan-2-yl)-2-(methoxyimino)acetyl]amino}-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 03:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is a (Z)-compound (source: Merck Index 14th Edition, p. 323). Best regards, --Jü (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC Name needs stereochemistry 

message: Structural formulae shows a (E)-C=N-double bond. This is wrong. According to Merck Index 14th Edition, p. 323 Cefuroxime has a (Z)-C=N-double bond. Best regards, --Jü (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't use the Merck Index as your only source of structural information, especially conformation. Nonetheless, I think you are correct. I've looked at the crystal structures of various similar cephalosporins, and of protein-bound cefuroxime (PDB 1QMF), and the oxime methoxy is always trans to the heterocycle (furan or thiazole). See, for example, ceftizoxime in A. Miyamae, S. Koda, Y. Morimoto, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (1986) 34 3539–3548 (CSD code FAJMAE). I have updated the image accordingly. --Ben (talk) 11:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural formulae in the box 

message: Is it safe to take alcohol after taking cefuroxime
 Roy Shapure (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cefuroxime
Talk:Zombie Zombie

message: According to this article http://web.archive.org/web/20101225083521/http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/216706/a-history-of-zombies-in-video-games/ Zombie Zombie probably was the first zombie game ever. Does anyone know whether that is true? 79.200.40.123 (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  first zombie game? 

message: Could someone clarify this?  I'm not a coder.  What on earth does it mean? 64.233.173.170 (talk) 15:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 channel audio on a single channel?
Wikipedia talk:Editor review/Natl1

message: Oppose I strongly discourage Natl1 becoming an Admin for Wikipedia. I believe the user is a little eager to help which is appreciated, however, in certain cases the user needs to give the creators additional time to finish adding content to a page before nominating the page for deletion. This is especially true for new articles. I believe that the user probably needs to learn the ropes a little more before becoming an admin. Rakeshsharma 10:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an old comment, but nominating an article as opposed to speedy deleting can be a good thing.  I've learned from experiance that a few nominations of my own led to people editing the article so it support.  I didn't nominate out of laziness, but I really had no clue on the subject and cited notibilty standards.  BuickCenturyDriver 13:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Parasite

message: what about the DC comics supervillain?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.21.221 (talk) 03:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cathinone

message: I think that this article treats the same substance. /Ahlabonde 11:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A hydrogen atom separates them.Karpeth (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 00:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The structure lacks stereochemistry and the name should be 
(2S)-2-amino-1-phenylpropan-1-one--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 01:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure image and Name 

message: It seems only one entry in the Legality table includes a source. Given that a recent edit just changed "illegal" to "legal" for a country, and that there was no source before or after the change, the validity of the change cannot be easily assessed. Kimen8 (talk) 01:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality sources
Talk:The Labrador Fiasco

message: The sentence "Labrador refers to the Canadian place rather than the breed of dog, the Canadian Forces helicopter, the Singapore Nature Reserve, the ocean current, the Canadian Coast Guard ship, the Costa Rican district, the Filipino town, or the American politician." is meaningless. The point is not what it's NOT but what it is. All that needs to be said is that "Labrador refers to the Canadian place". Sterry2607 (talk) 10:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant opening paragraph
Category talk:Military units and formations of the United States Air Force

message: I have flagged up to the article: Air Force Technical Applications Center.
The rest of the unassessed articles should also be flagged on their talk page with the {wpmilhist} template so, first of all, they get assessed (so they can be worked on as appropriate), and second, so they get "in to the system" under the USAF units and formations category. NDCompuGeek 12:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  talk page flagging of unassessed articles 

message: perhaps this should go to its own article instead of a header on the category?  Just a suggestion.... - NDCompuGeek 05:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unit Terminologies
Talk:Thearubigin

message: Why not keep the statement that tea fermentation is not a true fermentation? --Slashme 11:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: because it's a minor fact, and is probaly only worth mentioning once, in one place, rather than on every page. MatthewEHarbowy 16:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fermentation

message: I see MatthewEHarbowy removed the statement on the source of thearubigins as being derived from the condensation of theaflavins with epitheaflavic acids, saying that the citation didn't support the claim.  Sure, it isn't the primary source of the statement, but it is a freely available pdf, and it mentions the reaction.  I say keep it until you get a better source. --Slashme 11:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's wrong. Condensation of the theaflavins with the epitheaflavic acids cannot explain the thearubigins because theaflavins are formed at most in 5-10% quantities, and epitheaflavic acids are formed at most in 1% quantities, and the condensation of the two cannot explain the 20% or so mass of thearubigins even if all the theaflavins and ETAs are converted, which they aren't. See: ME HARBOWY, DA BALENTINE Critical reviews in plant sciences 16:55, 415-480, CRC Press, 1997.MatthewEHarbowy 16:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical origin of Thearubigins

message: How do you say Thearubigin?  Can someone add a pronunciation  to the intro?  RJFJR (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Template talk:Scouting Sections

message: Policy per Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria: "The use of non-free media in lists, galleries, and navigational and user-interface elements is normally regarded as merely decorative, and is thus unacceptable."
In every instance where images have been used with this template, they have been non-free images.  
I propose that we remove the image parameters and be done with this.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  19:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  16:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove images
Talk:Victoria College, Alexandria

message: Important alumni and impressive school. Article needs to have more topics and references. This school must have more to tell. Pictures are interesting. Make sure its neutral. Welcome Victuallers 19:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess for Schools

message: I have modified the alumni list, by removing an earlier alumni addition, "Mahmoud Ibrahim Mahmoud", of whom I found no references online, and was neither added in bullet or linked form indicating no intention on expanding on the alumnus's bio later. Although this article is more of a stub, please let's keep the list rigorous with adding only  notable alumni whom we can track later with appropriate references--Rehal 23:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding to Alumni List
Talk:Albany Creek

message: I do not see the significance of listing the bus routes, it's a little trivial for an encyclopedia M0rt 11:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree, although it's not necessary for them to be half the article. My vote would be to reduce to a single sentence - eg "Albany Creek is served by several bus routes from Brisbane CBD. All services are operated by Brisbane Transport." One could even list the routes as a simple list in place of "several". The template in question is not linked to any other suburb articles - it's normally used for train stations and ferry wharves. Orderinchaos78 13:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Self-correction - a statement similar to the above was already in the article. I've removed the bus routes - thanks for highlighting this issue. Orderinchaos78 13:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Stevens Arms

message: The guns that they made were of a high standard.If you know anything about this company or the guns have they made, talk about it please. cd 01:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Savage Model 24 was actually introduced by Stevens Arms as the Model 22-410 in 1938." Check the page for info. I have a .410 over .410 with rifle sights, but they don't address that configuration. Jororo05 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Gun 

message: If it would be beneficial to the article, I can produce a picture of their model 511 double shotgun.  If not, I won't bother.  Thanks. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 18:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double shotgun 

message: Any information thats available,  Manufacture date and value 207.255.186.38 (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Springfield / J StevensArms Co. Double Barrel / Side by Side 410 Shotgun Set.#P 29063   W 

message: Help 24.101.45.248 (talk) 21:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need the inner springs for a single barrel shot gun that dates late 18 early 19 hundreds
Talk:Air Division (United States)

message: The 830th and 834th Air Divisions were never assigned to the Strategic Air CommandRonald E. Mixer (talk) 19:52, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Division Gallery 
Talk:Erich Rudorffer

message: Hi, please see these discussions that took place on the topic: 
*Talk:Erwin_Rommel#Wehrmachtbericht_report.2C_take_2
* Talk:Erich_von_Manstein#Wehrmachtbericht_report
* Talk:Erich_von_dem_Bach-Zelewski#Wehrmachtbericht_report
The consensus was that these transcripts are not needed, and they were removed. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: per WP:BRD, please advise. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I will restore my edit per BRD since there was no response from the reverting editor. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wehrmachtbericht transcript 

message: some places say he was a airline pilot in Lufthansa, but in here it says different. Can someone look at it? Letapolis (talk) 15:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The thing about being a airline pilot before war
Talk:Wolf's Castle

message: Removed reference to a station called "Ford Halt". AFAIK the only Ford Halt there has ever been on the GWR was the one at Plymouth. Haven't been able to find evidence for any intermediate stations between Clarbeston Road and Fishguard. -- Picapica 11:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ford Halt" 
Talk:United States Air Forces Central

message: AFCENT has since become USAFCENT (separated from the 9th AF but taking on its heritage). The two existing articles need to be merged. See Ninth Air Force --Reedmalloy, 2010
: Talking about this on Talk:Ninth Air Force. --Pmsyyz (talk) 01:45, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge