lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Centrolophus

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Southern driftfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Centropomidae

message: WP:FISH suggests that the taxonomy used by FishBase should be followed. FishBase recognizes Latidae as a separate family, rather than classifying Latinae within this family. Therefore, I'm changing the redirect Latidae to an article on that family. --Ginkgo100 talk · contribs · e@ 20:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latidae and Centropomidae
Talk:Common snook

message: Deoxyribonucleic? Obviously that's nothing to do with sex-change: it's the D in DNA, the main chemical in genetic material, not a process of any kind. 
Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Pacific Railroad Acts

message: The following sentence makes no sense:  "This grant was apportioned in five sections on alternating sides of the railroad, with each section measuring one-fifth of a mile in length by 10 miles in height."  A section, by definition, is one square mile.  A section measures one mile on each side.  70.137.154.103 (talk) 03:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted your changes to restore my original language which was drawn directly from Section 3 of the 1862 Act (12 Stat. 489 §3) and which I had also cited as the source, to-wit: "That there be, and is hereby, granted to the said company, for the purpose of aiding in the construction of said railroad and telegraph line, and to secure the safe and speedy, transportation of the mails, troops, munitions of war, and public stores thereon, every alternate section of public land, designated by odd numbers, to the amount of five alternate sections per mile on each side of said railroad, on the line thereof, and within the limits of ten miles on each side of said road, not sold, reserved, or otherwise disposed of by the United States, and to which a preemption or homestead claim may not have attached, at the time the line of said road is definitely fixed." Therefore a land grant "section" as defined by the Act was one-fifth of a mile in length (i.e., along the grade or right of way) by 10 miles in height (2 sq.mi./1,280 acres), not one mile square (1 sq.mi./640 acres). Centpacrr (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I repeat, the definition of "sections" as it applies to the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 (12 Stat. 489 §3) is as stated above, to-wit: one-fifth of a mile in length (i.e., along the grade or right of way) by 10 miles in height (2 sq.mi./1,280 acres), not one mile square (1 sq.mi./640 acres), and that there were five alternate sections per mile on each side of said railroad. That is what the language of the Act says was how the land grants were to be made in the original legislation. As the subject of this article is the Pacific Railroad Acts, then the verbatim legislative language contained in the Acts is the absolute and ultimate source authority as regards to the definition of terms. To avoid any further confusion on your part as to this point, I have now inserted the exact language used in the Act defining a "land grant section" ("...every alternate section of public land, designated by odd numbers, to the amount of five alternate sections per mile on each side of said railroad, on the line thereof, and within the limits of ten miles on each side") to the text of the article. Centpacrr (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:An Elder Scrolls Legend: Battlespire

message: The cover used is a promo shot NOT the official cover.--The Rogue Leader 07:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Cover 

message: Is Battlespire patchable, like Daggerfall? --95.114.66.86 (talk) 15:25, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patches 
Talk:Cepola haastii

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sarcastic fringehead

message: That is all. Sheep81 (talk) 06:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably to do with its feeding habits. The word sarcastic "comes from the ancient Greek σαρκάζω (sarkazo) meaning 'to tear flesh'" Drutt (talk) 12:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What species does this animal even belong to, i cant seem to figure it out, im thinking maybe a blow fish but it doesn´t look anything like a blow fish or anything that would make it related to the blow fish 216.152.189.145 (talk) 23:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best. Name. Ever. 

message: I believe this should be named Neoclinus blanchardi, specifying that it is also called Sarcastic Fringehead. There is actually a reliable source for that! --> RUL3R*flaming*vandalism 06:10, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the article. 

message: A photo of an alive, underwater sarcastic fringehead opening its mouth would be useful to see to really understand this fish better. Maybe a picture of it closed too. Its mouth is mentioned in the article, but a visual would enhance things a lot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.47.155 (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  we already have an Image of the head of the living fish, so we had as well have the lead image show the entire body Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique body-type hard to understand through article. Better picture would help. 

message: — Assignment last updated by Maeflowerbailey16 (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Communicating Science

message: M.
O 209.34.99.162 (talk) 21:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  L
Talk:The Elder Scrolls Travels: Shadowkey

message: I intend to track down a few links to add as citations in the hopes that I can bump this up to B rank (or possibly GA).  Aspect Of Shadows 04:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added links, citations, cleaned up a few minor things and added a side bar and logo.  Would like to submit this for independent review for upgrade in rank (upgraded from stub to start on my own based on wikipedia's definition of ranks).  Aspect Of Shadows 06:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Work 

message: Short version: It's solidly start-class. 
Long version: 
* Please don't copy sections wholesale from other sites, even with attribution, due to copyright concerns.
* The gameplay section needs some description of how the game is actually played, etc. The only indicator I saw was the infobox which listed it as a "first-person RPG", which can mean anything from Alakabeth to Dragon Quest Swords.
* Although I approve an early attempt at a criticism section, please don't simply tick off the bullets at the top of the review, nor should you attempt to respond to them except with other critics' reviews.
If you have any additional questions, ask me. Nifboy 01:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games/Assessment|Request for Assessment]]
Talk:Taiping Guangji

message: A juan isn't necessarily a "volume". In the case of the Taiping guangji, each juan is only a few pages, so it's misleading to call it 500 "volumes".
Xihe 01:23, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consider opening a centralised discussion instead for consistency.  – robertsky (talk) 13:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Taiping Guangji →  – I had temporarily abandoned my crusade against bad titling but am now back at it. Titles like this should absolutely be capitalised sentence-style, not headline-style. Barring Amazon ads and Wikipedia mirrors, just take a look at the best and most recent scholarship on the Taiping guangji (and many other works of a similar ilk); this would also be in line with the pseudo-consensus reached here. "WHERE INCONSISTENT IN SOURCES, DEFAULT TO SENTENCE CASE" (emphasis NOT mine...) Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 19:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 December 2023
Talk:Chaetodon

message: Their used to be a rabdophorus page now it's redirected here but because they're not synonyms and not all the species in chaetodon are in the rabdophorus sub genus it should be changed back so individuals who want to read about rabdophorus and not chaetodon as a whole can do so Irishfrisian (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabdophorus 
Talk:Shatabdi Express

message: I,Superfast1111 have uploaded a few images on the page. However another user Abhishek191288 'thinks' they are irrelevant. I strongly argue that Shatabdi's images on Shatabdi's page are very much relevant & since they are not doing any harm whatsoever anyway they should not be removed.
Superfast1111 (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: The claim that the 12041/42 Howrah - New Jalpaiguri Shatabdi is the fastest diesel hauled train is incorrect. It covers the total distance of 1122 kms in 16 hrs 5 mins giving it an average of 69.76 km/hr. The Pune - Secunderabad Shatabdi which is also fully hauled on diesel power covers a total distance of 1194 kms in 16 hrs 55 mins giving it an average of 70.58 km/hr. Both calculations have been made inclusive of all halts for the sake of parity.
Thus, the Pune - Secunderabad Shatabdi must be considered the fastest diesel hauled Shatabdi Express.
Superfast1111 (talk) 07:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed claim 
Talk:Channa

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect พระฉันนะ. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 05:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "พระฉันนะ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect นายฉันนะ. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 05:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "นายฉันนะ" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Can there be a discussion of where the genus name comes from? "Pla channa" seems to be the common term in Thailand.   2405:9800:B910:DB49:A58D:CB13:423D:8789 (talk) 02:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channa name
Talk:Bonneville cisco

message: This shouldn't go in the article but, for the amusement of passersby, when I was a kid growing up in Bear Lake, I heard multiple times that the cisco existed only one other place in the world: Loch Ness. Another lake whose bottom had never been found (insert spooky noises here). And, therefore, it seemed likely the two lakes were connected somehow, subterraneously. And that's also why the two lake's monsters were so hard to discover—whenever you looked in one, it was likely in the other. Or midtransit, I guess. Thmazing (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loch Ness
Talk:Barred fingerfin

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 09:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Magpie perch

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 14:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Painted moki

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Porae

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 11:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Red morwong

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 19:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Nemadactylus macropterus

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed