Talk:List of cities in Brazil by population

message: I put little thumbnails of one of the major cities in brazil
Mateus Zica 03:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities 

message: This section is totally inaccurate. Cities that by themselves have more population than other cities, with their metropolitan area, do not appear in the list. While other cities seem to have grown for wikipedia. Please, let's try to be unbiased  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.100.41.199 (talk) 01:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest metropolitan areas 

message: I've now been forced to protect this page. Rather than constantly reverting each other on the article, and not communicating, use the talk page to discuss your issues and reach a consensus. Thanks. GedUK  11:53, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection 

message: There have been a number of changes/reversions to the article recently, (often without use of edit summaries) and I thought it useful to set out some thoughts here. 
The Urban Agglomerations section formerly used this source, which has the benefit of being in the English-language and is reliable (the UN). The current source used for this list refers to 'municipios' so does not seem to be agglomerations but cities although in any case the list does not match the source. 
The lower half of the article (Cities)  is currently sourced to an article that lists a large number of cities in alphabetical order. It is therefore proposed to use the above IBGE source for the Cities section, and hence reduce the list to 25. 
I propose to make the above changes shortly but please post any thoughts here. Thanks. Eldumpo (talk) 06:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent reversions

message: The article is vandalized. The city "Colômbia dos Americanos" doesn't exist!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurteb303 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Hello there.  I just wanted to let you know that I'm willing to update this page with the most recent estimates from IBGE (as of July 1, 2016) but first I had a couple of questions.  First of all, why does the chart only go down to #85 (Guarujá)?  Was it previously decided that the chart would be limited only to those cities with 300K or more?  Secondly, are the 2nd and 3rd columns (rank among capitals and rank among non-capitals) really necessary in this chart?  Personally, I think it makes it harder to read and a little more confusing than it needs to be.  Let me know what your opinions are!  Thanks!  Coulraphobic123 (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't touched this page but was the last person to update List of metropolitan areas in Brazil. IMO 300K is an arbitrary place to draw the line, but so are other thresholds. I agree the 2nd and 3rd columns are unnecessary – bolding the state capitals is enough. Cobblet (talk) 06:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 Estimates 

message: Why did you undo my edit, ? Can you not see the fixed ranking column ? It allows any of the cols on the table to be ranked. Guarapiranga (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , Your change removed a relevant functionality of the table. In the stable version it is possible to sort, for example, the column "cities" alphabetically, and see their respective ranking positions. This functionality is particularly essential. Similarly, it is possible to classify the population on "2010 census" column, and see the respective positions in that year. (false)--PauloMSimoes (talk) 22:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  How so, if the rank column is fixed to the 2018 numbers? No, it isn't. You can't rank by growth either. That's precisely the reason to use a fixed rank column. Besides:Guarapiranga (talk) 23:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  (edit conflict) I see now, my apologies. The option to sort "2010 census" and respective positions in that year is most important. I'll revert my edit.--PauloMSimoes (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed ranking column 

message: The images for Belo Horizonte, Manaus, and Curitiba seem pretty non distinctive to me, could there be better options? Of course if a city is dominated by same-ish residential towers, it can be shown, but to me these are a bit too same-ish and I am not even sure, a native would be able to recognize their city from any of these, though I might easily be wrong on that. --Sir Stephens stille Stunde (talk) 17:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images