lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fokker D.VII

message: "So infamous was the airplane, that it was the only weapon specifically demanded by name by the Allies in the armistice agreements at the end of the war."
Citation?  I'm pretty sure the Machinenpistolen 18 was also specifically mentioned.
:Section A.IV.  I can find no mention of the MP18, however.
 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/firstworldwar/transcripts/aftermath/armistice_terms.htm
:Dabarkey 05:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's up with this article? Some kind of fanboy changes the production numbers without quoting any source, even adds a personal and not very serious judgement into the article "Albatros soon surpassed Fokker in the quantity and workmanship quality of aircraft produced. With a massive production program, over 3,000 to 3,300 D.VII aircraft were delivered from all three plants, considerably more than the commonly quoted but incorrect production figure of 1,700."
And nobody protests? Is it a general consensus that WP let's unquoted unverified and obviously not neutral changes?
I have been getting instant reverts on articles about french and british aircrafts on quoted and sourced facts by armies of WP users but here no one seems to protest in such an important article like fokker dVII?
To answer to the core problem. In my encyclopedia "World military aircraft history" by Enzo angelucci, page 59, it says that of 2000 orders only 1000 were produced before end of war, so my encyclopedia number is far from both the fanboy unsourced claim and the original number of 1700, also unsourced. Shouldn't we correct it?77.197.174.175 (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allowed WP inaccuracy? 
Talk:Spider-Man vs. The Kingpin

message: The name of this game, clearly seen on the pic of the box cover included in the article is Spider-Man. There is no "Amazing" in the title. The SegaCD version did add the "vs. The Kingpin" part, likely to distinguish it from Acclaim's Genesis game, also called Spider-Man, based on the then current cartoon series, but the original, cart version for Genesis was just Spider-Man.70.225.216.76 04:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the load screen for the Genesis version of the game has the full title, even if the cart itself only reads "Spider-man."Chewbacca1010 04:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name
Talk:Barkley Shut Up and Jam!

message: This has been in the works for a little while according to various gaming sites.
Should we update the article with a section on it?
Y. E. S. --ToyoWolf (talk) 05:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the news posts about this over on Kotaku today, and the first trailer... well, it's an entirely different game.  There should be SOMETHING about it on Wiki though. --Bishop2 (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

text: To confirm that this game was ON the Jaguar, I will list the Jaguar as a platform. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden 

message: I've noticed that the Sega Genesis is the only system to receive a sequel. Are there any sites to find out if the Genesis version was more popular in terms of sales? Also, there's a lack of reviews on this article. I'd add some, but I'm too lazy at the moment. :P Would anyone care to find any? - 24.222.194.150 (talk) 02:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales and reviews?
Talk:Beyond Oasis

message: Out of 300? Is that possible?*  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.152.3.9 (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: GameFan had a team of three reviews who would score games on a scale of 1 to 100. If you add their three scores together you get a score on a scale of 3 to 300 (though I have no idea if that is GameFan's official method of determining an overall score or something the WP editor made up for their own use).--Martin IIIa (talk) 04:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  GameFan Score
Talk:Jill Taylor (Home Improvement)

message: I've removed a reference to a meterologist here. I'm not sure that this person is notable enough that we have other supplementary sources of information to write an encyclopedic article on her. --HappyCamper 03:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: About to ask the same thing. If Jill has a page, so should Tim, at the very least. Tim is the main character after all.-RomeW (talk) 09:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 May 2024 

message: Upon closer reading of the above, it looks like Jill Taylor (Home Improvement) is a better choice with regard to current practice for articles about TV series characters. Favonian (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised my decision
Talk:Jilly Cooper

message: In reading about the pop band "The Wedding Present," the FAQ (http://www.faqs.org/faqs/music/wedding-present-faq/) said that the song "Dalliance" (which is a great song) is "based on the sad story of Sara Johnson, the mistress of the husband of famous English author Jilly  Cooper." Just curious, what's the sad story?--Tdkehoe 03:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sad story of Sara Johnson

message: The treatment of Octavia in a biographical article on its author is disproportionately long, with descriptions of its TV production even down to naming the first cast.  It is surely more appropriate to make it the information the basis for an article on the work in its own right.Cloptonson (talk) 06:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: 8 years later, and the section still seems disproportionate. It's by no means obvious that Octavia is significantly more important than JC's other romance novels, and she's hardly Jane Austen in any case. --Ef80 (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Octavia''
Talk:Consol (bond)

message: Surely "Consols" are just an abbreviation ?  Shouldn't this be under the full name - Consolidated Stock ? (with redirects) 
And isn't "Consols" plural ?
-- Beardo 03:54, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that's its an abbreviation for Consolidated Annuities, and has for nearly two centuries been considered a word in its own right (c.f. Webster, Chambers, and Bouvier's Law Dictionary), it probably shouldn't be under 'Consolidated Stock'. Mauls 09:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I changed it to plural again. The plural form is the current use in the markets (in my first-hand experience, but see also for example the London Stock Exchange glossary ), and plural makes more intuitive sense, as the term is a contraction of a plural form (consolidated annuities). -- Marcika 14:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although originally Consolidated Annuities, the article says the current stock are called "Consolidated Stock". When did the appreviation come into use ? -- Beardo 07:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition in the LSE glossary has changed, but there are plenty of places which corroborate "consolidated annuities" -- especially the Columbia Encyclopedia  and the 1911 Britannica [www.1911encyclopedia.org/Consols]. -- 192.223.158.62 11:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: In "The Great Wave", David Hackett Fischer says:
"In 1745, after the the effect of rebellion in Scotland was added to a general European war, London's security market suffered its first 'Black Friday.' The price of Console dropped below 75."
He cites "A History of Interest Rates" by Homer. How sure are we that consols were first issued in 1751?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.170.227.240 (talk) 04:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1751?
Talk:Marcus Nanotechnology Building

message: This article seems like it has a lot of sources/refs, but little content. Anyone up for writing a few more sentences? --Disavian 03:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Quinn (given name)

message: Hello. This is a discussion page. It is meant to discuss the attached article (in this case the article is about the word/name "Quinn"). This page is not meant to add new material to the article (that's for the article page). Also, it helps readers if you stamp your comments using four tildes (~) as the last part of your entry. We'll know when you made your comments for instance. Thanks, Hu Gadarn 19:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a discussion page 

message: The name Quinn appears to originate from County_Longford, County_Clare, County_Mayo and County_Antrim in Ireland during the 2nd Century CE via the line of Conn of the Hundred battles through his son Art mac Cuinn and Art's 5th his great grandson Niall Ó Cuinn, or Niall of the Nine Hostages.  While the signature is typical for R1b European males in general, it is characterized by 11,13 at DYS 385a/b and 14 at DYS 392. Within the second panel of markers the most distinctive difference from the R1b Modal is the 15,16,16,17 at DYS 464.Matching Niall at Family Tree DNA https://www.familytreedna.com/landing/matching-niall.aspx
The genetic reports at the Quinn Surname Project with over 150 tested individuals with and without the Quinn surname report a portion of them are M222+ which is what many call the Niall markers and reports that 1/12 of all Irishmen alive today descend from Niall. Quinn Genetic Genealogy Surname Project https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Quinn/default.aspx?section=ycolorizedVoodooShamen (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 
Talk:Markovnikov's rule

message: I have watched this article bounce back and forth between which carbon the halide will go. Before someone changes it back, please re-read and re-check yourself - the halide will go to the carbon with the MOST substituents, and the proton will go to the carbon with the LEAST substituents. The opposite is true for the Anit-Markovnikov rule. Umdelt 06:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting to know Markovnikov's rule

message: I am uncomfortable with the anthropomorphic wording of the following two phrases:
:the positive charge wants to be in the most stable form
:the radical prefers to be in the center of the molecule
A molecule cannot "want" or "prefer" anything.  Reactions occur because of underling physical properties.  Unfortunately, I do not feel that I am qualified to write those phrases with more appropriate terms.--Mikebrand 04:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear educators use words like that all the time - I guess it's hard not to anthropomorphise a little. Anyway, it looks like this has been dealt with now. Richard001 08:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anthropomorphic terms

message: This needs to be checked:
"The rule states that with the addition of a protic acid such as H-X to an alkene, the acid hydrogen (H) becomes attached to the carbon atom with the greatest number of hydrogens, and the halide (X) group becomes attached to the carbon with the fewest hydrogens.[3] In other words the negative part of the addendum attaches itself to the carbon atom with the fewest hydrogen atoms."
The reference link states "In the addition of HX to an alkene, the acid hydrogen (H) becomes attached to the carbon with fewer alkyl substituents, and the halide (X) group becomes attached to the carbon with more alkyl substituents." Not what is written up above.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apilgrim135 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Markonikovs  

message: The opening paragraph of the article should say what Markovnikov's rule actually states. Not that it "describes the outcome of reactions".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.17.136 (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first sentence is terrible.
Talk:Halim Haryanto

message: As HH is an Indonesian who emigrated to the United States, I put him in both American sports figures and Indonesian biography. Cheers V. Joe 04:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubs
Talk:Epulonipiscium

message: I have added the  template to this article.
*What is a "Useful links" section?
*The entire section of text that follows is not wikified whatesoever.
Michael Sappir •  (Talk) 04:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created an external links section and moved the link there. The "Useful Links" section has been renamed and the first word was changed from 'this' to 'the'. BioTube 16:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I attempted to clean the article up and add some more pertinent information. Aleanto 03:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup required

message: Could someone please add a picture or photo of this bacterium?
--137.215.6.53 (talk) 07:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Basic Allowance for Housing

message: DependEnts, not dependAnts
Should also discuss what Partial BAH and BAH-II is.
:You know the Wikipedia is freely editable, right? -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:16, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, so you ought to feel free to edit it however the heck you see fit. You want Partial BAH and BAH-II explained? I am sure you can do a fine job of it.Isaac Crumm 06:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:National Weather Service Duties Act of 2005

message: Here's a comment:  This article states that the bill in question has already died in committee.  It needs a statement/citation that backs up this statement, as a bill generally isn't "dead" until Congress adjourns for the year.
:Which it has done so. While that solves that problem, it also means that the THOMAS link is now dead... 68.39.174.238 09:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had missed that (The link being active), however the Congress that sat in 2005 is (Still) dead. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 01:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Troy Simmonds

message: 1) Context. He seems to be an Aussie footballer. I'm an American, I don't understand football except to the most limited level. 
2) Neutral point of view- "He placed his best footy" seems to be the highlight. 
3) Style/Wikify: It just is so strangely formatted its hard to read. 
4) Verify: No sources whatsoever.
V. Joe 04:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs
Talk:Rachel Plummer

message: Not much, but a start.  I'll work on it as time permits, or of course, feel free to help. (Texan Traveler 04:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to Fort Parker points to an entirely different Fort Parker, an Army fort in Montana.  --Davecampbell 19:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Fort Parker 

message: I restored the conclusion which had been edited out of the article.  The fact a pregnant 17 year old girl was able to survive for 2 years among the fierce Comanches remains an amazing feat.  Her book is a timeless look inside a culture long destroyed, and the end section is a vital part of the article. John1951 23:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to remove the section again.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, [a memorial], and we should be trying to present the text in a formal format.  The articles should also be written in neutral point of view, and this conclusionary paragraph is meant to have a point-of-view.  The facts should instead be presented in a concise format without editorializing.  Encyclopedia articles should also not have a conclusion.  Is there any information missing in the rest of the article that is in the conclusion that you feel should be included? Karanacs 01:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoring conclusion
Talk:Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain

message: "ilk" is clear POV, ilk is a negatively loaded word.Merc25 04:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  to whom it may consirne 

message: My concern is she isn't listed at all Manicpickmenightmaregirl (talk) 16:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amy Hennig was design manager of this game
Talk:Apartment Life

message: * Billboard year-end ranking
* Billboard record label controversy
* CMJ radio airplay ranking
* CMJ core radio ranking
::Carbrera (talk) 03:11, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links for expansion
Talk:Chambal Garden

message: Suspicions of plagarism and this is a little too vague. Ah well, we'll mark it up some.... 
Williamborg 04:33, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not sure this is noteworthy, but we'll soon see whether Maniabhinav's contribution survives... Williamborg 05:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Summer Glau

message: "Glau is an animal lover". I rest my case.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.101.5.97 (talk) 12:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd love to find out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.55.235 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia as a fanpage generator 

message: Doesn't the personal life section normally have something about partners? eg. Daniel Wisler, 2006-2009 (met on CBS' series "The Unit" in 2006); Cooper Gross, 2009-2011; Val Morrison, 2013- present (currently engaged to Summer)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.148.117.91 (talk) 13:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partner(s) 

message: The editor  Robsinden (talk) has removed the Firefly (franchise) navbox falsely claiming that  WP:BIDIRECTIONAL states "no actors in navbox when in fact is says nothing of the sort, so I am here to get a consensus. discuss Sarty72 (talk) 20:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefly navbox 

message: Ms. Summer Glau is also quite famous for her portrayal as Tess Doerner in The 4400, shouldn't it be added to the top of her page along with her work as Cameron(TSCC) and Isabel(Arrow?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.75.154.115 (talk) 15:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 4400
Talk:List of mystics

message: I has been suggested by User:0x845FED that we move the paragraphs at the bottom of the page to a separate article.  I strongly support this and would do it myself now if I had the time.  Is there any opposition to this idea?  John (Jwy) 04:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe Mysticism (eastern)?  Then we could update this page to add a link. John (Jwy) 03:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

text: In that case I would merge it with Mysticism.  Mystic, as it is a disambiguation page, should only be to help people find the right page, not include content beyond that.  If Mysticism is changed, the line for it on the Mystic page could be changed to reflect that change as appropriate. John (Jwy) 13:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm not entirely sure why mystic and mysticism are two separate articles. There doesn't seem to be a clear divide to make this useful. FT2 (Talk | email) 11:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: This section of the intro seems to be WP:OR or at best unsourced to me. can it be reviewed and if necessary rewritten or replaced?
:"The primal difference between a mystic and a present day philosopher would be that a mystic works towards spiritual fulfillment where as a present day philosopher in some sense works towards academic recognition, i.e. their motivation for their chosen paths are different. A mystic just as every other thinker, wants to help make a difference in the world, but understands the limitations of language. A true mystic then tries to approach the situation by being mystical and hence truthful to himself in his actions."
For example: is a part of the definition of a mystic that they work towards "spiritual fulfillment"? Is this really "the primal difference" and if so, who says this? Do all mystics by nature intrinsically "want to help make a difference in the world"? What is a "true" mystic, presumably as opposed to an "untrue" one, and who classifies mystics in this way? Is it verifiable to say that a "true mystic" (whatever one of those is) "tries to approach the situation by being mystical"? 
Rewrite needed I think. FT2 (Talk | email) 12:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: I propose to redirect this article to Category:Mystics.
* Agree Sharnak (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose vote to redirect this article
File talk:Haeckel Batrachia.jpg

message: I see a 1919 deathdate, that's not more than a hundred years ago... Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 04:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ernst Haeckel is German. Should change to  ? 70 years after the death of the creator would long enough in Germany ? -- 65.95.106.88 18:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikimedia Commons gives a proper license. Let's leave it like this for now and delete the image when it's no longer needed for the main page. Jobjörn 19:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain? 

message: It appears that Ernst Haeckel's (5) Rhacophorus pardalis (Wallace) frog was copied from an earlier work done by Alfred Russel Wallace, as also noted in discussion here:[] Under 'Frog Image'. My question is, at that time, did it violate a copyright? DiligentPen (talk) 10:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question: Copied art?
Category talk:Music of Brazil

message: How should this category connect with :Category:Brazilian styles of music? -MrFizyx 04:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Duh, nevermind, I didn't see that it was alread a subcategory here.  It still seems a little odd though since one might expect to find choro, etc. at this level.  I suppose it makes sense though. -MrFizyx 04:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger?
Template talk:Robert A. Heinlein

message: Decided to go ahead and rename the template to account for its new, wider scope. So no need for someone else to do it.
:I'm confused as to how books creates a wider scope. In any case it is general practice to use novel rather than book. The template should probably be moved to Template:Heinlein (novels) to conform to standards. This will recreate a bunch of double redirects, so if it's not done, I will move it when I'm not going to sleep. Chuck(contrib) 05:05, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template renaming 

message: book titles should be italicized here... --Lukobe 18:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  italicization 

message: Is there any reason for not including the early FH collections under FH/WAM; that is: The Man Who Sold the Moon, The Green Hills of Earth, Revolt in 2100 and Orphans of the Sky. Also, The Past Through Tomorrow is really a "collection of collections" and has had different stories for different editions. The only story that does not appear in one of the other collections above is Seachlight. Searchlight may not even be a Future History story at all.
In my opinion, TPTT should be taken out of the list and the four collections above should be added. What say you?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RoyGoldsmith (talk • contribs) 16:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When I built the current template, I chose TPTT because a) it is by far the most-comprehensive Heinlein short-story collection, and b) it's the only one with a name not also shared with a Heinlein work. YLee (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Future History 

message: Should that be listed under other novels, when it isn't a novel ? -- Beardo (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Removed. Dan Bloch (talk) 15:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jonathan Hoag