lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Churches in England

message: I have now created and part-populated Churches in... subcategories for all but one of the counties listed in :Category:Buildings and structures in England by county.  The one exception being Rutland, where no churches are currently listed on Wikipedia.  (I nearly said "where there are no churches" :o) ).  Several others (such as Isle of Wight) only make it by the skin of their teeth with a single identifiable entry.
Entry qualifications for the categories are fairly vague, essentially to include: any Christian church, chapel, cathedral, abbey, priory, minster, etc, building; whether active or ruin; whatever the denomination (so Roman Catholic and Anglican buildings are freely mixed - very ecumenical!); whatever the size.
Identifiable church congregations, rather than church buildings, have been moved to :Category:Churches in the United Kingdom.  In future these may well warrant their own category.
Each category is also a sub-cat of the appropriate County category, and also the 'Buildings and structures' category for the county; the thinking being that readers may be seeking information from several different directions, and this will help them find it.
This is an ongoing process, please feel free to join in!
EdJogg 14:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategories - 'Churches in England' (by county)
Talk:Trunk Line

message: I starded making this line map of Hovedbanen and Gardermobanen, but I'm a bit unsure of all the points those two meshes. If someone with a bit more knowledge of these particular lines could fill in it would be greatly appreciated. --GSchjetne 22:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you got it well there, you even picked up the fact that Gjøvikbanen dips south before passing under the main line. I don't think anybody could reasonably ask for anything more than that. :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German line map 

message: Why call this article "Trunk Line"? Why not use the original English name "Norwegian Trunk Railway" or the official Norwegian name "Hovedbanen", or use the terminal stations in the name to make it more informative for non-scandinavian readers: "Oslo - Eidsvoll railway" or "Oslo - Eidsvoll line". --Sveins (talk) 12:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the article
Talk:Weldon Spring Ordnance Works

message: The notability of this organization is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for organizations, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about W.S.O.W., or books in which the site is mentioned. Judging by the article's content, such sources should certainly exist; it's jst that none of them have been cited in the article.
Please add sources to the article. For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: The article talks about the environmental problems but says nothing of how they have been addressed or are being addressed, what the status of the cleanup is, anything about the interpretive museum on site, or the hike to the top of the containment structure. --Kbh3rdtalk 04:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated information / lack of information
Talk:Joaquín Sorolla

message: I've begun expansion of the article, so far adding to opening, youth, and 'Sad Inheritance'. Still to come are his mature successes, commission for the Hispanic Society, portraits, and sketches, etc. JNW 21:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo

message: The Court of Appeals opinion says nothing about the sufficiency of the evidence presented to the TTAB, and does not reverse the district court upon this ground.
The only issue the Court of Appeals deemed it necessary to address was the question of laches, and even there, it confined its analysis to the claim of laches as directed against only one of the petitioners, who was only 1 year old in 1967 when the trademark was adopted.  The Court of Appeals remanded the case to the district court for further evaluation of the laches issue as to that individual petitioner, and that is all it did.  The article portrays the decision as far broader than it actually was, and as resolving issues that the Court of Appeals did not discuss, much less resolve, at all. Tarmstro99 15:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although the case was ultimately decided upon procedural grounds (Laches), the District Court opinions are notable because they are an explication of an underdeveloped area of the law: 15USC1064 Cancellation on 15USC1052 "immoral, scandalous, or deceptive material" and/or "disparagement" grounds.  This article should either develop this topic, or there should be a disambiguation page referencing the District Court opinions.  The problem lies in the fact that the cases have essentially the same name,and are distinguished by their legal citation.  This is a format that isn't entirely conducive to WikiPedia's naming conventions... 24.193.42.103 (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since all of the opinions relate to the same cause of action, there really should only be one article detailing what happened at all levels of the case. bd2412 T 18:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: District Court Opinion
Talk:Weh Island

message: "Rubiah was used as a quarantine place for Indonesian Moslems".
The majority of Indonesian articles refer to Muslims, not Moslems, and the latter redirects to the former. Do you prefer Moslem, or is this just a 'cut and paste' issue from the source? --Bwmodular 16:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think both are correct. Let say Muslim to get consistencies. Thanks. — Indon (reply) — 16:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim of Moslem 

message: *It is well-written
*It is referenced well enough
*It covers the subject well enough, delving into many sides of the subject matter
*It is NPOV
*It is stable
*The images and the map contained are comprehensive
===Some suggestions===
*Maybe an image could be included to the "inhabitants" section to illustrate the life on the island, however keeping in mind its small size and relative inaccessibility (both physically and in the virtual world), it is not a block to GA.
Baristarim 21:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your time to review this article. I cannot promise the image, because it is difficult to get one with suitable license, esp. from that small island. Oh, I reverted your  template, because it looks awkward and most of WP articles do not use that template. — Indon (reply) — 12:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you want to I can upload this image from Pulau Weh: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3509305&l=00aca59e16&id=613226280 13:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: *Maybe an image could be included to the "inhabitants" section to illustrate the life on the island, however keeping in mind its small size and relative inaccessibility (both physically and in the virtual world), it is not a block to GA.
Baristarim 21:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your time to review this article. I cannot promise the image, because it is difficult to get one with suitable license, esp. from that small island. Oh, I reverted your  template, because it looks awkward and most of WP articles do not use that template. — Indon (reply) — 12:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you want to I can upload this image from Pulau Weh: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3509305&l=00aca59e16&id=613226280 13:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Some suggestions
Talk:The Realm of Joy

message: I suppose we could add a cast list, but is it worth it? Adam Cuerden talk 17:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm sorry, but per WP:WIAGA, there are criteria which are not met by this article. 
First of all, while the GA nomination admits that the article is short, it could be considerably longer (even in the realm of discussing a one-act play). The article is not nearly comprehensive enough, per criterion 3(a). Why did Gilbert write the play- was it simply to lash out at Chamberlain, or had Gilbert always had the idea for this show? What was his writing process- was it always supposed to be a farce? Did he write it in a quick burst, or did it take him months (or years)? Where did he get financing? For how long was did the play originally run? Was it (critically and commercially) successful? Was it ever put in other theatres / by other theatre companies? Was the play ever published? The "comprehensiveness" criterion is less strenuous for GAs than for FAs, but I would still take a look at some Featured Articles, specifically those regarding literature, for some inspiration and guidance. In addition to the comprehensiveness issue, there are zero images in the article. Obviously, I doubt someone could find a photo of the original production of the play, but I'm sure there could be something appropriate. This would not be necessary for the article to become a GA, but it would certainly help.
Best of luck, and feel free to resubmit to WP:GAC when these issues are addressed. -- Kicking222 20:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, until we have a Background section, I would almost call this article a "start" intead of a "B".  But it's a very good start!  -- Ssilvers 20:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely a very good start, if not a very good B. It's not yet Good, but it's certainly good. -- Kicking222 06:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Still needs a cast list, productions section, Critical response section, etc.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA nomination of 11/16/06
Talk:Pawnee, Kansas

message: The "factual errors" I referenced in one of my edits tonight were: A) The town serving as the capital for five days, and B) Pro-slavery legislators demanding a move. 
*One of the sources I added today says its service was four days, as does one of the web links already referenced. (July 2, 3, 4, 5.)
*Another of the sources I added specifically said that legislators from both sides of the slavery issue were unhappy with the location.
Otherwise, I've mostly just been adding references today. RM2KX (talk) 03:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I just reverted my edits to the number of days, due to a more reliable source, the Governor himself. See note [a] on article page. RM2KX (talk) 23:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  3/23/17 Updates
Talk:Bethel College (Kansas)

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  08:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article
Talk:Taffeta

message: How do you clean Taffeta.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genejaco (talk • contribs) 12:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: by washing it. next question?66.80.6.163 (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning 

message: Taffeta nylon often is used in outdoors equipment such as tents. I think this type of use should be covered, since it is obviously not used for its aesthetic properties...   --Ozhiker (talk) 09:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in outdoors equipment 

message: The caption does not match the image description. Racconish  Tk   08:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:OIMPalcost3.jpg 

message: heres a summary of the text from the 1915 text cited now in the article: Taffeta is a plain, closely woven, smooth fabric made from silk or synthetic fibers, with the warp and weft of the same or nearly the same thread count. It was initially a stiffer fabric, but is now available in the more pliable chiffon taffeta form. It was used as a clothing lining in the Middle Ages in England, as an alternative to the more costly cendal. It is often used as the foundation for velvet or gold brocades, and for the reverse side of satin ribbons.The name may come from the Persian word "taftah", or "twisted", referring to the hard twist yarn used formerly in taffetas. The earliest mention of the fabric dates from 14th century France.
:I will try to incorporate this at a later date.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:48, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: "They were less flexible than the Indian mills..." Were the fabrics or mills less flexible?  -- SEWilco (talk) 19:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The mills. OR though.   Racconish  Tk    19:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flexibility 

message: Sexy...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.2.104 (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice photo 

message: Modern taffeta was first woven in Italy and France and until the 1950s in Japan.
This doesn't make sense. It was first woven in Italy and France, and then suddenly "until the 1950s in Japan"? NotYourFathersOldsmobile (talk) 05:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sentence makes no sense 

message: The Production section of the article infers many but different things.. The recent citation[] was with clear Edit remarks(→‎Production: Citation added but more citation required to verify the complete information.)  but deleted. Instead of allowing more reference the provided one was also removed[]. If it was not appropriate should not be discussed. . Thanks RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 01:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @Roxy. i am doing it again[]. Kindly discuss before reverting any edits. Thanks RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 02:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Shawnee Methodist Mission

message: Shouldn't the second paragraph read Kansas City, Kansas instead of Kansas City, Missouri? I know it's on one side of the river, but the communities are in Kansas, not Missouri.  - Parsa (talk) 03:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  KCMO is the biggest city in the metro area.  I addressed the issue by using the metro article.  Thanks. Americasroof (talk) 04:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kansas instead of Missouri?
Talk:Fort Leavenworth National Cemetery

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Please edit the article to explain and clarify. --Animalparty! (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this different from [[Leavenworth National Cemetery]]?
Talk:Pacific herring

message: When talking about Pacific Herring collapse, it seems odd to leave out the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (which either directly or indirectly caused he collapse of Pacific Herring in the Prince William Sound).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.230.99.66 (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fishery Collapse 
Talk:Dustin-Leigh Konzelman

message: Dustin-Leigh Seltzer is the name that she goes by now. This is also the name that people now know her as.
67.85.37.224 (talk) 17:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Weak Support From a google search, I found that she is known as Dustin-Leigh Konzelman from competing at Miss America and from The Amazing Race 10. She is also known as Dustin-Leigh Seltzer from competing The Amazing Race 11 and her personal life. I'm inclined to think that Dustin-Leigh Konzelman is her WP:COMMONNAME, however I could be persuaded that her married name should be used. I also think that Dustin-Leigh Konzelman Seltzer is too long, so I'm not in favor of using both of them. I will add a redirect page for Dustin-Leigh Seltzer, though. What does everyone else think? MissAmericaGirl (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, a redirect page already exists for Dustin-Leigh Seltzer. Perhaps it's best to just leave it that way. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 22:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose move if page to Dustin-Leigh Seltzer 

message: *https://cbulancers.com/news/2004/9/23/Dustin_Leigh_Konzelman_Bio.aspx?path=general
--evrik (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  other sources
Talk:Red garra

message: Why does the Cyprinion macrostomus redir to this page? The text of this page says specifically that the C. macrostomus is not discussed here. Either we need to add Cyprinion macrostomus info or kill the redir and build an article for the other creature. Pawthorn 18:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Circular Reference

message: A separate article on fish pedicure per se is needed.  For example, the chin chin fish is used in China, but it would not fit into the current article, which should be on one species/genus only.  A Google search will turn up discussions of sanitation and other issues (http://www.freetalklive.com/ has a video poking fun at New Hampshire's ban but also an article where people cited refer to specific alleged dangers and other problems).211.225.34.184 (talk) 01:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This may be right. http://princefish.com/about_doctor_fish_garra_rufa.html says that "...Chin Chin fish also known as Kiss Kiss fish comes mostly from China and Taiwan..." - a different fish - a lookalike. If this is right, and I'm not sure it is because the links in the above posts 404 for me, then a little section talking about this might be in order. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  article on fish pedicure needed 

message: Why on earth is this? Is it because, as I suspect, the states are worried about the possibility of Garra rufa escaping and becoming an invasive species? Stonemason89 (talk) 04:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned in several US states?

message: I wonder if there should be a section on Appy Feet (http://appyfeet.co.uk/), as it is a franchising company that only actually uses these fish as a pedicure device.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.239.210 (talk) 22:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appy Feet? 

message: Under the "Spa resorts" heading, it stated "They are used to help treat patients suffering from various skin disorders, including psoriasis and eczema, since the fish will eat and remove any dead skin." I have removed this statement for two reasons: first, because it claims medical efficacy where none has been demonstrated, and second, because it was unsourced. Bricology (talk) 20:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pruning unsupported claims 

message: A close-up. We could really use one for the article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of mouth

message: Is this the only species known as a doctor fish? The accepted common name according to the IUCN and Fishbase is red garra. Quetzal1964 (talk)   06:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Anshani

message: I'd like to know the source for the number system.  I cannot find it in my copy of Incursion... --Nerdvana 15:37, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is from information that is going into the next version of Incursion. It is also based on the value codes on Page 53. If you notice, the values are combinations of 1's a 3's. So we derived their numbering system from that. --Kedamono 21:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes, I see that. Thanks for the citations though. (And how do you know what's going into the next version?!) --Nerdvana 03:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm on the design group for the next version of the game. Kedamono 06:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Sir Frank Bowden, 1st Baronet

message: The page for Raleigh Bicycle Company states that Bowden DIDNT found the company, rather two other individuals did, and Raleigh shortly after took charge of it and changed it from Bicycle -> Cycle.
One of these two pages must be wrong. 2A02:C7C:C411:FC00:9EA5:C53E:14E5:6533 (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder of Raleigh
Talk:Marillier shot

message: It could do with expansion on the other players' use of the shot. Yomanganitalk 15:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other players
Talk:List of municipalities and towns in Slovakia

message: Under the current law, towns are not considered municipalities in Slovakia. Therefore towns should be removed from this list or they should be added and the list renamed "of towns and municipalities". Juro 15:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The format is not so... useful... Better in a table? emijrp (talk) 12:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page format 

message: I'm trying to fix a link to change it from pointing to Polianka to Polianka, Slovakia, but the page is seemingly impossible to edit. It just says "Database error: A database query error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software.
[e238fd5d-d403-45c5-97ad-8ebf2d90e72b] 2023-12-04 15:53:51: Fatal exception of type "Wikimedia\Rdbms\DBQueryError"" HappyWith (talk) 15:54, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page broken?