lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carbondale, Pennsylvania

message: This Discussion page is for talk about improving the article; nothing else. See the above rules. Other statements will be removed.
trezjr 19:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article input

message: The article warning about objectivity must be addressed by its author, or it will be removed. Political viewpoints are not allowed.
Article must maintain an encyclopedic direction.
trezjr 19:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: There is no record of Jeffrey Sabina being a "noted" anything--in Carbondale or anywhere else.
I am challenging the person not the work.
Verify that this person is noted.
trezjr 23:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeffrey Sabina 

message: The mine fire article lists a coal fire at Carbondale, yet this article does not mention it. --ukexpat 15:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mine Fire? 
Talk:Tom Brown's School Days

message: Whoever disputed the neutrality of the "Language" section doesn't seem to have commented on the talk page. I agree that this section needs looking at, the points in it are made as if it is factual rather than opinion (it reminds me of being lectured by a GCSE English teacher). I suggest it is changed or removed. At the minimum I think it should come much further down the article. However, since it seems to have been there so long, there should probably be some debate on it first. 
--Lawrennd 04:04, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The language section should be cut out entirely. The language is relatively straightforward and not "singularly dense and impenetrable" and the novel certainly isn't the "very epitome of mid-Victorian obfuscation". The entire section not so much POV as complete nonsense. 62.25.106.209 13:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: Why is Tom Brown's School Days hated by some?
J. Michael Reiter
:That line isn't in the article any more (though I'm thinking about putting something back in somewhere about the strong feelings the book arouses).  I think the main reasons are that it's preachy, it defends fighting among schoolboys and only mildly criticizes birdsnesting, it approves of the highly stratified society of the author's childhood, and some people were forced to read it as children.  —JerryFriedman 16:45, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: Curiously the boy on the book cover appears to be playing softball/rounders/baseball. It doesn't look like a cricket bat and it certainly isn't a normal stance for cricket. How did that happen? Jooler 15:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rounders and a game called "baseball" (see British baseball) have long been played in England.GordyB (talk) 13:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: book cover

message: The "film adaptation" section is useful; sadly one cannot say the same of the sub-section "Changes to the story in movie versions". Since "Movie 1" is not identified, and, to judge from the last entry (result of Arthur's illness "not known") has not been watched all the way through, it should be removed.  --Javits2000 16:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie versions: table 

message: Might want to flesh out the "Characters" section with a brief description of each character. The last three listed aren't even mentioned anywhere else in the article, so in my opinion it's fairly pointless to list them unless they have at least a brief description (no spoilers necessary). Also: Could delete the last three characters in the list and re-title the section "Main characters". Softlavender (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree  with your second suggestion and would delete the last five so that only the four hyperlinked remain. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 08:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, let's wait and see if there any other opinions. Softlavender (talk) 08:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 
Category talk:Colors

message: How does green get to be in the C section even though green starts with G?? 66.245.74.203 00:57, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Lost of colors were messed up like that.  Bug in the sort key.  A null edit fixes it, so I fixed 'em all. --ssd 04:36, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: True or false: "Category:Shades of green" might soon become large enough for it to be a valid sub-category of this. 66.245.14.21 02:18, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The question you ask has an opinion for an answer.  Opinions are not true or false. --ssd 04:27, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, what is your opinion?? 66.245.67.194 13:12, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No one has focused on this question for 7 full months. Now, I think the category is large enough (120 articles) so that I think it is time to do something like this. Georgia guy 23:33, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  True or false?? 

message: Why is there a :Category:Colors and a :Category:Color? Isn't it the same thing? These should be merged. Zhatt 03:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Color is about color in general, :Category:Colors are specific colors.  Colors is a subcategory of Color.  ∴ here…♠ 07:53, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Colors/Category:Color 

message: I am proposing a rename to "Category:Named colors". See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Color. Comments? Notinasnaid 20:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rename
Category talk:Knots

message: I could not figure out how to make the following change to the page:
Add "square knot" to the list, and refer people to "reef knot". Many people do not know a square knot is a reef knot.
Andrew
: I did it.  It turns out you can add a category to a redirect page.  It made sense to me in this case because "square knot" is a much better known name. Dpv 02:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  add a reference to square knot 

message: It looks like some knot sub-categorization is starting; this is a good thing.  Here are some initial ideas about categorization schemes for more the complex sub-categories.  Discussing these first might save some headaches down the line.  Feel free to add other sub-categories for consideration. --Dfred 00:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that number 2 would clutter the category, and numbers 3&5 are (I believe) against wikipedia policy/usage. Number 4 seems to me to be the best solution as long as someone is willing to do the work. Dddstone 19:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Knot sub-category organization

message: Seems like there are three basic classes of loop knots: Fixed, Adjustable, and Running. (others I'm forgetting?)  There are several options here, not limited to:
#Ignore these distinctions and simply add all loop knots to "Loop knots"
#The three sub-classes of loop knots each made a sub-category of Knots, with each loop knot is only added to one of these.
#All loop knots get added to "Loop knots" as well as their specific sub-class category, as in 2.
#Three sub-categories made under "Loop knots", itself a child of Knots, this would be seemingly reasonably compatible with 2 if I understand categories correctly.  But perhaps adding category depth where not really needed...
#Need to read up on categories, but could the sub-categories of Loop knots also be sub-categories of Knots?  (Sort of combining 2 & 4)
Other ideas?  Better/more canonical names for sub-classes?  Is one of these ideas more compatible with Wikipedia than the others?  --Dfred 00:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that number 2 would clutter the category, and numbers 3&5 are (I believe) against wikipedia policy/usage. Number 4 seems to me to be the best solution as long as someone is willing to do the work. Dddstone 19:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Loop knots

message: These terms are often conflated with one another.  Different sources give different definitions of specifically what each means and which may or may not be equivalent to which.  Possible regional or international differences may also exist.  The structure of the disambiguation/definitions of the articles bearing these names should be mutually compatible with whatever is decided here for categorization purposes.  --Dfred 00:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Braid/Plait/Sinnet/Sennit
Talk:Totalisator

message: I removed the (US) qualifier for the spelling totalizator as several Australian TABs use this spelling in their name "Totalizator Agency Board". kudz75 01:26, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Commonwealth/US Spelling

message: *Agree: the tote board article should be made a redirect to the Totalisator article & any supplementary info merged into the latter, which is the correct official term. Bezapt 12:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal (posted May 2007 with no discussion yet)
Talk:Bob Page (Deus Ex character)

message: I don't get it. Why change the article's whole name? There isn't another Bob Page on Wikipedia, so why bother? We only change article's names if they're getting in conflict with something else. There is no need for this. – Mackeriv 02:16, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: JC Denton and UNATCO both exist as is, without (Deus Ex) on the end; for consistency's sake, I agree this should go back to Bob Page. TPK 03:37, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Barbapapa

message: A bit of an odd topic, yes, but I loved these when I was a wee one, and I recently stumbled upon the pun mentioned in the text. Wanting to share this but not finding it on Wikipedia (horrors!) I made the article so I could share the pun.
Yes, I need more of a life... Radagast 02:22, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
The French names seem to be different... Which is the original names? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.226.122.243 (talk • contribs).
:The original ones are now there. –Mysid 21:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi - the composer keeps getting changed. Neither piece of information has a citation. Why is it being changed? Luminifer (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer

message: Wouldn't it be fair to mention the name of the Dutch publisher who saw something in Barbapapa after the writer had been turned down by every single publisher in Europe? His name's Frank Fehmers, for your information.182.23.44.130 (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch publisher erased from memory?? 

message: In the section about songs inspired by Barbapapa, I see no mention of the Hebrew-language song "Barba'aba". ("aba" being the Hebrew equivalent of French "papa"). It is a Hebrew-language song about the characters in these stories - particularly about the namesake character known as "Barbapapa" in English and the original French and "Barba'aba" in the song's Hebrew language).
I'd add the reference to this song myself --- but I haven't time right now to do all the prerequisite research (I don't even remember the name of the artist). But just in case anyone else wishes to do the research, here's the one lead I *do* have --- a link to a YouTube video of it:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.99.57 (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew-language song 

message: There reads: The inspiration for Barbapapa came by chance in the Luxembourg Gardens in Paris one day in May 1970.
Google Doodle for today claims the first book was published 45 years ago, and that would be May 19, 1970. Fr-wiki seems to have that day as the inventing day, and there is also 1970 as the year for the first book. 85.217.20.110 (talk) 22:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First publication? 

message: This Dutch version of this article (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbapapa) mentions that the first edition was also published in Dutch, however this article says it's only in French, English and American English. Which one is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.239.6.177 (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First edition also in Dutch? 

message: Barba Lib is described in this article as an intellectual. Was not her defining feature that she liked reading? Vorbee (talk) 08:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Barba Lib
Talk:Hypertension

message: * Why are there two sections with the same title, both summarizing the secondary hypertension article? 
* The second of these two sections says "Kidney disease is the most common secondary cause of hypertension", with a 2007 source. But this 2018 article - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.12831 - says that primary aldosteronism is "the most common form of secondary hypertension".
* The second of these two sections ends with "A 2018 review found that any alcohol increased blood pressure in males while over one or two drinks increased the risk in females". But isn't alcohol intake an environmental factor in primary hypertension? -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 16:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary hypertension 

message: * Any clue why was this reference deleted? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hypertension&oldid=prev&diff=1194011142 --Nirts (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censoring HUNT study? 

message: “Hypertension in cats is indicated with a systolic blood pressure greater than 150 mmHg, with amlodipine the usual first-line treatment. A cat with a systolic blood pressure above 170 mmHg is considered hypertensive.”
:Is it 150 or 170?
2601:1C2:5000:8CC7:50C5:429D:DA9A:D81B (talk) 08:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Table 4 in the source which supports the statement, 150-159 = Bordline hypertensive, 160-179 = Hypertensive, >180 = Severely hypertensive. CV9933 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cats: which is it?
Talk:Cooper

message: Who is J. G. Cooper?  A famous biologist or just a regular biologist?  What is his claim to fame that makes him worth listing here? - Tεxτurε 03:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: J. G. Cooper

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cooper (profession) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: A nitpick for sure, but coopers don't make barrels: they make staved containers. A barrel is a specific size of staved container. I've edited this to point out that barrels are just one kind of staved container.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelson.mark.t (talk • contribs) 03:29, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooper (profession) description
Talk:History of philosophy

message: Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy#Proper_article_for_"History_of_philosophy". fgnievinski (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split again 

message: Title between this article's 'introduction' and 'Western philosophy'... limiting scope of the article  ...Arnbiology (talk) 15:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main studies of thought
Talk:Nancy Lancaster

message: Nancy Lancaster recently survived vfd. See: Talk:Nancy Lancaster/Delete -- Wile E. Heresiarch 04:01, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: : I'm glad. She was a very influential design influence, and owner of the iconic design firm, Colefax & Fowler. Codenamemary (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Ovallerand (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Histoire du design d'intérieur
Talk:Timbuktu

message: Shouldn't the city's role in Donald Duck (Donald's hideout if he has to leave town because of a grotesque blunder) be mentioned either in the introduction or under trivia? I think most people know Timbuktu only from Donald Duck comics.
80.79.32.43 (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Donald Duck and other appearances of the city in modern culture are mentioned under the section Modern Legacy. It has been moved from a (now gone) popular culture section, as these sections are often either subpar or the content can be integrated into the main text, as has been done here. Now it is part of the legendary tales - which fits rather well. Pim Rijkee 16:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to second this motion, although it is a bit old: It was very surprising to me that Donald Duck is not mentioned at all in this article, as that is the only place where I have ever heard of Timbuktu. It made me question myself and whether they're even connected, so when I looked it up I found this talk page. I definitely think there should be at least a mention! Romeowth (talk) 01:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Donald Duck

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Timbuktu
Timbuctoo, Westampton, NJ 08060
—108.24.105.38 (talk) 18:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Timbuktoo in Westampton Township has a separate article, at Timbuctoo, New Jersey. The coordinates in both that article and this one appear to be correct. If you want to report a coordinate error in this article, you'll need to provide a clear description of what you think is wrong. If you want to report an error in the Timbuctoo, New Jersey, article, please do so at Talk:Timbuctoo, New Jersey. Deor (talk) 18:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: What about the aristocats 2A00:23EE:14C0:91B:B2F:405A:2C82:9002 (talk) 03:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture
Talk:List of serial killers by country

message: Hello, I'd like to read any opinion about said article and the possibility of inclusion under "Argentina" — not under the name of the current suspect but under the generality that the deaths were proven to be deliberate and the acts of a person, with the prosecution treating (sourced) the case as serial murders. 
Do you think that any the case, we should wait until a conviction? Thank you a lot. CoryGlee (talk) 09:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. I am from Argentina, and all I can say is that murderers (and murderesses) generally dissapear from the news here (even from social media) while awaiting trial, so there are no new info regarding Cordoba's (alleged) killer nurse. I am for waiting until conviction before listing her or any material related with her crimes per WP:BLPCRIME. Regards.--Darius (talk) 18:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'd wish an opinion on [[Córdoba Neonatal Hospital baby deaths]] 

message: The Belgian Congo is the only defunct state/territory with it’s own section in the page. I think we should remove it. Add one for the Democratic Republic of the Congo and put William Unek there DaldoZanti (talk) 23:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Belgian Congo” 

message: Add to list of Australian serial killers
Martin Bryant: Convicted of the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre which left 35 people dead and a further 18 injured.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Port-Arthur-Massacre Sindamir (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a serial killer. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024 

message: Udai Hussein, son of Dictator Saddam, could be added to that list. 4 murders are described in his article and he also killed several of his rape victims. --2A02:560:553E:C00:C0CD:23D1:9D15:4211 (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Udai Hussein 

message: Léopold Dion: On 17 November 1972, Dion was stabbed to death by a fellow inmate named Normand Champagne.
Gilbert Paul Jordan: Died on July 7, 2006 ChrisHanlonCA (talk) 08:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Killers that should be marked as deceased
Talk:P-700 Granit

message: from playing Jane's Fleet Command, i always thought this missile has a 900 kg warhead.--71.102.8.166 (talk) 04:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This whole article needs to be scraped for being pure comic book-like speculation that falls far short of what would be charitably called even original research.
According to GlobalSecurity.org, which is a legitimate WP:RS, no photographs exist of the P-700 and adds the following: "but the missile is believed to have a broad cylinder body with pointed nose. Halfway along the body is an air inlet for the turbofan or turbo-jet which is used in the cruising phase after the missile has been launched with the aid of two solid propellant boosters." Yet this article somehow has become the beneficiary of a wikipedian who created this “sketch” of the missile without citing what source of information the artist used in creating a sketch that shows a ramjet-powered missile. Ramjet makes zero sense for something traveling only Mach 1.6–2.5.
Are we to believe a mere wikipedian gained access to classified information to create a sketch? A sketch of a ramjet-powered missile that can cruise as slow as Mach 1.6?
Moreover, the article currently has this description of the missile's capabilities:
Such capabilities are absurdly fanciful for Russian computer technology of the late 1970s. Moreover, this citation:
[7.0] Soviet-Russian Naval Cruise Missiles / Chinese Cruise Missiles
...leads to nothing but a home page where such an assertion cannot be confirmed.
This article is more imaginative comic book than encyclopedic information buttressed by citations to reliable sources. 67.171.61.192 (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entire article is based on non-reliable sources 

message: Erroneous evaluation or disinformation by МО РФ. The video shows clearly Kalibr type missilehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM1tSkV1oB0.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A314:813E:7980:C837:A622:BD76:22C3 (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch from ''Tomsk''
Talk:Melting

message: Why is melting of "Low" importance.. why is this article not in chemistry? I think in chemistry it is AT least a mid importance, just as it should be in physics.. Anyways, I'm adding chemistry tag as medium, but I won't change the physics importance for now. IlyaV (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low importance 

message: "Molten" redirects here but wouldn't it better redirect to liquid, from a semantic point of view? Nurg 08:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Molten"

message: Is the opening line in this article a vandal's joke: "In physics, cheese is the process of heating a solid..." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 5Q5 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?

message: I edited the article a little to make it more accurate. If anyone has any revisions or references, they'd be greatly appreciated. It's not great, but it's a start. However, we might want to merge this article with the melting point one. Torris 20:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need References

message: "From a thermodynamics point of view, at the melting point the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of the material is zero, but the enthalpy (H) and the . Melting" ( Martin |  talk • contribs  02:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete sentence 

message: see my message at User talk:Ojovan#No self-advertising, please. -- Marie Poise (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No self-advertising, please

message: Added lede to heat transfer, here. Prokaryotes (talk) 16:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heat transfer 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :🫠 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🫠 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "🫠" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]