Template talk:Talkback

message: Hi! I would like to know if it is generally acceptable to write the following in the ts field (after ts = ):
: by ~~~ at ~~~~~ 
I did this at User talk:146.199.119.203 (in this edit) to avoid having something like the following (gramatically incorrect) example occur:
:Message added 00:00 Noah Kastin (talk)
(This would be generated by writing  ~~~~  in the ts field, which was what I had been doing until I thought of the proposed way of formatting the ts signature.)
If anyone has any thoughts on whether this is acceptable or not, please let me know.
Thanks!
Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 00:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see nothing wrong with that. Go ahead and do it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ts parameter formatting 

message: what
2602:306:CF66:8A00:B189:314A:FAF2:B0AF (talk) 23:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 01:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2017  

message: 103.242.23.188 (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  —  IVORK Discuss 05:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 27 August 2017 

message: Hi there,
My name is Sayed Mobin and i did some edits on the Wikipedia page of Jamila Mujahed which is my mom and most of the facts that i said true and doesn't need a prove as she traveled to more than 30 countries i can send you pictures of her passport if that will solve the problem or she got the title of the Modern day Malalai was also mentioned in the post hopefully you would allow the changes to take place 
Thank you 
Sayed— Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.12.203 (talk) 23:00, September 1, 2017‎
:This is not the place to post this message. Please post it on the talkpage of Jamila Mujahed: Talk:Jamila Mujahed.--Auric  talk 12:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jamila Mujahed  

message: I think the graphic in the Usage section is outdated. It shows a graphic of the text "New Section" (), but I think the Wikipedia interface now says "Add Topic".--papageno (talk) 04:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section now Add Topic 

message: Of course I know your rules and I follow them whenever possible. However, you don’t follow your own rules, true conflict of interest is pervasive throughout Wikipedia. But when I want to correct misinformation or add some true data, you throw me under the bus. Then when I complain, passionately, you blame me instead of hearing me and my concerns.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.18.50.3 (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your Rules 

message: #. Talkback is only capable to talk back to 1 person even if you want to talk back to 3 people discussing in a section? 
#.  With {{reply to|User1|User2|... it is possible to reply to multiple people, so why still using the Talkback template?
Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 19:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the difference with the {{reply to|User1|User2|... tempate ? 

message: Yes, we already know as we can do that to anything. You have the new message notification, and then below that in small text, it's "You can remove this notice at any time by removing the  or  template." Do we really need this part? Who here removes a talkback notice on their talk page when they read their talkback and removed it? Sure it's in the revision history, but who goes to their revision history to find an old talkback? If you do, it would take forever. This is the most useless part of the template.  Can I Log In's  (talk) page 18:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Talkback&action=edit remove this notice] at any time 

message: Can you add  107.77.189.15 (talk) 01:39, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Where? – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

text: – added to the semi-protected documentation. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 03:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 7 August 2020 

message: The 1977 Datsun 280Z was de-tuned with re-ground camshaft, loser compression and a gear reduction started. I worked at the dealer during the 70’s and owned a 1976 Datsun 280Z. They where into training so much that they had a mobile van with parts, cut-a-ways, books and power point presentations. In July, 1979, any vehicle produced after this point was equipped with a catalytic converters for unleaded. I current own a 1969 Datsun Roadster, Model SPL-311 that used the 1.6L pushrod engine and the badge was 1600. While a 2.0L overhead camshaft was the 2000 called the Fairlady. The styling cues where used to produce the 240Z. 
Ken Kelly ASE Master Tech since 1978 kenkellysr@ hotmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.119.253.57 (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: the more i read this, the more i don't understand it. lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみなさい, ping me when replying 13:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1976 Datsun 280Z was rated at SAE 182 HP. 

message: Currently the template has the text "you can remove this notice" and "remove this notice" is a link to edit the page. I speculate that it is this link that is sending some users to this talk page instead of back to the other user's talk page. I would suggest removing that link from the template, so that the only link generated is to the talk page. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the edit page 

message: The old image was from about a long time ago, like more than 5 years. Replace it with the newest UI. TylerMagee (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated