Talk:Direct methanol fuel cell

message: Grantalkin (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for striking out your link, but those must be crooks. I work in DMFC research and I never heard of these patent trolls, so there is no reason to give them free advertisement. 193.175.53.21 (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link question 

message: "Reaction" segment says talks about OH radical, then quote "Using these OH groups" lists reactions with OH- ions. whether the reaction is written with H+ or OH- makes sense depending on the pH of the solution. but what that's got to do with the formation of OH radicals? some clarification would be nice from an expert.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.21.48.174 (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction - Clarification needed on OH "group" 

message: I thought it would be appropriate to include a section on the catalysts used in methanol fuel cells. They're essential part of the cells function, but there isn't that much information about them on the current page. Any thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hispinstate (talk • contribs) 01:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Add Section on Methanol Fuel Cell Catalysts

message: Arguably the most important aspects of a fuel cell are its energy density, its efficiency, and its power capability per unit mass or volume. If someone knows of a reliable source for this information, please do add it. The only thing I saw here was that "methanol has 15 times the energy density of li-ion batteries" - which suggests DMFCs have huge potential, but without their efficiency or power output per kg, that statement tells us little.
Dan Pope (talk) 03:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No real efficiency or power output numbers 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Direct methanol fuel cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211170242/http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/online/news/articles/2007-09/US-Department-of-Transportation-moves-to-approve-fuel-cells-for-aircraft-use to http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/online/news/articles/2007-09/US-Department-of-Transportation-moves-to-approve-fuel-cells-for-aircraft-use
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509155910/http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/311_intl_acceptance.shtm to http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/311_intl_acceptance.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: how can you say "in contrast to indirect methanol fuel cells" when your stated direct reaction is literally methanol + water = steam reforming into hydrogen. direct would be single step methanol + o2 or maybe oh-, and renaming the current indirect methanol fuel cell to double indirect methanol fuel cell, because of external steam reforming, and not internal steam reforming (h2o step in both).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goofyseeker311 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cell