Talk:Transhuman

message: 1947:
New Year's Dawn, 1947... A poem by Robinson Jeffers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.127.200 (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: de Chardin used the words “trans-humanity” and “trans-humanizing” but did he ever actually used the word “transhuman” in any of his writings? --Loremaster (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did "Trans-Human" first make appearance? 

message: Loremaster, please explain why you are reverting the page.
I have pointed to clear evidence that "transhuman" was used by both Teilhard de Chardin and Julian Huxley in 1950 & 1957.  The use of the word "transhuman" in both cases is clearly in line with what is talked about later on.
Please explain why you are reverting my good faith edits, without any explanation beyond "no original research," contra Wikipedia policy.
LionKimbro (talk)
:My apologies. Due to some weird glitch, I was unable to see some of the content of you added so I reverted it. That being said, some of your edits are a bit awkward so I'll work on polishing them. --Loremaster (talk) 02:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, de Chardin used the words “trans-humanity” and “trans-humanizing” but did he ever actually used the word “transhuman” in any of his writings? --Loremaster (talk) 02:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure what you are talking about but that content was probably removed because it didn't come from a reliable source. Regardless of how obvious something might be to us, we cannot add original research in the article. --Loremaster (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain Reverts 

message: For many years, there are have been minor disputes about the etymology of the word “transhuman”. The Transhumanist FAQ of the World Transhumanist Association has always argued it goes back to FM-2030 (1966). However, some people dispute this by arguing that it actually goes back to Julian Huxley (1957) or even Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1949). However, although Huxley and de Chardin used terms like “transhumanism”, “transhumanity” and “transhumanizing”, we need to confirm that they excplicitly used the word “transhuman”. So my question is: Does coining and defining the words “transhumanism”, “transhumanity” and “transhumanizing” automatically mean that one has coined and defined the word “transhuman” even when one have never explicitly used that word? --Loremaster (talk) 03:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Kind of an in-depth question, but I'd have to go with "not automatically, but possibly".  In this case... not necessarily?  I think you sum it up there: we need to confirm that they excplicitly used the word “transhuman”. Human.v2.0 (talk) 01:19, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymological dispute 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Transhuman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061231225013/http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/FAQv21.pdf to http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/FAQv21.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522082157/http://www.transhumanism.org/index.php/WTA/more/huxley to http://www.transhumanism.org/index.php/WTA/more/huxley
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070124193905/http://www.transhuman.org/fm-2030story.htm to http://www.transhuman.org/fm-2030story.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130828014330/http://www.cryonics.org/book2.html to http://www.cryonics.org/book2.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050827141335/http://www.transhuman.org/ to http://www.transhuman.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified