lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Westwood High School (Williamson County, Texas)

message: I was just about to post some relevant information about Westwood High School, and then, to my surprise, I found that the page was protected from editing.  "How odd," I thought to myself.  "Why would anyone want to stop the free flow of information?"
(Post made by 70.112.174.64, one of the IPs that added false information) WhisperToMe 17:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page protection

message: WhisperToMe, while I understand your concern about vandalism, it's been protected for nearly a month now, during which time nobody could edit it.  I'm unprotecting and will keep a look out for vandalism. --Tony SidawayTalk 19:59, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotecting

message: Anyone interested in re-attempting the Computer Science section of the article? The last attempt was apparently removed due to the frequent vandalism of it.
-- Mik 18:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer Science 

message: Should there be a short summary section on some school clubs, or would that be too unnecessary? There seems to be a lot on electives, so why not clubs? - Yellow Panda  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow Panda (talk • contribs) 07:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clubs 

message: Possible bias with "judge shafting" citation needed for Nishu Mehta.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atosecond (talk • contribs) 15:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate 

message: In order to maintain encyclopedic formatting, exclamation marks will be removed, and I must remind editors, keep an objective viewpoint.66.68.18.72 (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: encyclopedic formatting.
Talk:Kare-kare

message: I moved this out of the article because it will inevitably be deleted, and risks the entire article being deleted.  It is safer here on the talk page, and a summary could be put back into the article.  — Pekinensis 04:46, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed - Recipes belong over on Wikibooks:Cookbook - they are specifically excluded from Wikipedia (see WP:ISNOT#HOWTO) and should be transwikied to the Cookbook FlagSteward 23:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (my work is not real hehehe) --112.200.109.98 (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: They were there for 2 years-I call bullshit--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "British Occupation of the Philippines"
Talk:Tuluá

message: As it stands, this is quite unencyclopedic. "famous for its attractive women and delicious food…You can find different ways of entertainment…The best thing you will not regret when you are here…" This is an encyclopedia, not a tourist brochure. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:11, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
: I concur, this page does not read like an encyclopedia article.  You reverted my edit changing "Columbia" to "Colombia", was that a mistake on your part or am I missing something?  Thanks. Mr. Know-It-All 05:29, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup: Unencyclopedic
Talk:Inside Deep Throat

message: * Yahoo! Review
* Ghost in the Machine (archive): Let Me Clear My Throat Succeeds in inserting Sir Thomas More into the oral argument.
The comment is humor.  I thought it up myself.  Now, this "Ghost in the Machine" actually sat through this masterful retrospective.  I ask you: was his brain on idle during time?  I think not.  Is there a single word of his review that we can incorporate into the page? Amorrow 05:37, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some reviews 
Talk:Anne Fine

message: she writes loads of cool books and she is my favourite author.
We are reading Goggle-eyes at school it is really good!
 
Is this all a lie?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.151.65 (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: (old)

message: in the article footer links LC and other catalog data.
1989 and 
1992 winners at Carnegie Medal Living Archive (2007?) --P64 (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Fine is on the 2014 Carnegie Medal (literary award) shortlist, announced today. We don't list any books published since 2009(?) so at least some update is needed. --P64 (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 
Talk:Sandalphon

message: Can someone please figure out what this is supposed to mean? "Physical descriptions of Sandalphon vary depending on the source. He is uniformly depicted as extremely tall—he exceeds Hadraniel (another angel) in height by a 500-year foot journey."
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.105.231 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 8 August 2005
:It means that physical descriptions of Sandalphon vary depending on which source you're consulting—because there are so many different descriptions of him, it's impossible to create a unified picture. One thing all descriptions of him share is that he is very tall: he is taller than Hadraniel by a certain height that measures the distance it would take you 500 years on foot to traverse. I think the wording is clear enough, but if you'd like to propose an alternative, please do. (Also, please sign your posts.) Makaristos 20:20, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Sandalphon, is depicted in many sources, as an Angel of Unborn Children, Children, Life, and so on. I was surprised I did not see this on the main page.
Unfortunatley, Makaristos, I do not know anything about his height, but I can imagine he would have to be tall if he were indeed the angel of new life.
--KidManga  — Preceding undated comment added 14:30, 30 April 2006
:Can you cite some sources? Please put all this on the article. It's very interesting stuff. Also, please sign your posts. Makaristos 22:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandalphon as an Angel 

message: Can you include a reference to Longfellow's poem about this figure?
http://archive.org/stream/thecompletepoems01365gut/old/cphwl10.txt
In Birds of Passage - Flight the First  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.108.78.10 (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandalphon - Longfellow 
Talk:Partial discharge

message: Not sure how corona can occur in solid insulation. It can occur in air,gases maybe even liquids. But solids?? I don't think so, Can anyone explain this??Light current 23:31, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dielectric breakdown within liquids and solids is considerably more complex and less understood than within gases. However, breakdown within either solids or gases seems to be preceeded by the formation of gas-filled cracks or bubbles which have significantly lower dielectric strength than the parent dielectric material. Once these voids form, you will get corona/PD within them (hence the K&Z comment). You can increase the breakdown voltage of oil by putting it under pressure (thereby helping to prevent initial bubble formation). However, there are a number of other mechanisms that can also lead to internal field concentrations and treeing/breakdown, such as long term space charge injection within solid and liquid dielectrics, alignment of particulates along E-field lines in iquids, etc. I've modified the wording a bit in the PD article to provide a bit more information on the physics/chemistry underlying the phenomenon. Bert 15:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Linked Partial Discharge to newly created Electrical Treeing article, since older "treeing" article only discussed hunting dogs.  Bert 17:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Corona and partial discharge

message: Partial discharge measurement would be more useful to the reader as a section of this article, to give context and iluustration of the phenomenon. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Decline merge I don't think this makes a lot of sense. In the interest of clarity it makes more sense to seperate the articles. However, it is a good idea to have a crosslink in each article! Such crosslinks are already available!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HVWeb (talk • contribs) 09:20, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Support - Partial discharge measurement would be better as a section of this article. There appears to be a WP:Conflict of interest by the editor, who has been creating several articles like Partial discharge measurement, along with links to one company's product pages. Mr. Credible (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge
Talk:Whitehead manifold

message: Isn't the three dimensional sphere called S^2 not S^3 ? --anon
:Well, S^2 is the 2-D sphere embedded in R^3, that is, the usual sphere. S^3 is the sphere in R^4, not in R^3. So everything is correct. Oleg Alexandrov 15:34, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2-sphere or 3-sphere

message: "It follows from our previous observation, the Hurewicz theorem, and Whitehead's theorem on homotopy equivalence, that X is contractible."
I'm not clear what previous observation this refers to. I think this proof would be a bit clearer (to me, at least) if it were fleshed out what the nature of this observation is and what the maps are in the application(s) of Whitehead's theorem. vivacissamamente (talk) 22:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our previous observation
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ranjan Agarwal

message: VfD page comes up as top Google hit; should be redirected. PeteG 06:40, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: that, to put it bluntly, is Google's problem. Certain Wikikpedia procedures (e.g. VfD) have been established by consensus and should not be disrupted without further consensus from all involved just because a third-party site presents a particular page in a particular way. Ianb 12:53, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, it's Wikipedia's problem.  VfD and other special pages should be excluded from search results using robots.txt. - PeteG 16:33, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  if you believe it is a problem, please discuss this on Wikipedia_talk:Votes_for_deletion before taking unilateral action. In the meantime please refrain from turning the page into a redirect. Ianb 17:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Old Orchard Pub(Dublin)

message: The creator of this site: http://student.dcu.ie/~brennd22/pubs.html sned me this:
Please use any of the articles on the site. I'd be grateful if you could source anything taken from the site.
Good luck,
D. Brennan
Site Developer
Jorgenpfhartogs 06:46, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Copyvio 

message: Will rewrite an article on the temporary page The Old Orchard Pub(Dublin)/Temp
Jorgenpfhartogs 12:55, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Eric Melvin

message: This article needs serious renovation. It's got too much opinion in it and since when is NOFX indie?
        Um... since forever? When have NOFX ever appeared on or recorded for a major label? They chose not to continue having their material released on Epitaph after Epitaph sold an interest in the company to Warner Music. Derrrrrrr.172.150.109.193 20:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:56 kbit/s line

message: I have now substantially rewritten the article. My understanding is that 56k lines only used the most significant 7 bits of each sample period to avoid interference from robbed-bit signaling in the least-significant bit of every sixth sample. A more modern system might have tried to phase-lock to the RBS, or to have used error-correcting codes to mitigate its effects (as well as fixing any residual BER on the line), and thus would have been able to achieve a rate of 64000 * 47/48 = 62666.6+ bps. However, that was way too complex a solution to the problem, given the 1960s-era engineering of the time 56k lines were created, and dropping the bottom bit was simply easier. -- The Anome 10:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewritten 

message: I used to have a 56k modem hooked up to the internet (in England) ages ago, but I never got transfer speeds close to 56k a second. At best it was like 3 or 4 k. From what I've seen of other peoples' 56 modems, they get similar speeds. Does anyone know why this is? Is it just that they were always busy or something? If so, why didn't it ever get above 3 or 4 k? Thanks. Doom jester 12:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Don't You Actually Get 56K a Second?
Talk:Harris levels

message: The question may be a tad tasteless, but if the Harris levels turn out to be particularily violent, or pointless, or masochistic, etc. it could be significant. --Kizor 07:59, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As a person who played a few of Eric Harrises maps on DOOM I must say they are pretty non-notable and boring. Unless someone told you or you read the readme youde never know that the wads were made by a mass murderer. --Arm 13:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The speculation on them being like the school is interesting.  When I was in secondary school, back in the day, we had a Doom map of the school on the schools computers.  And yet, no massacre there. --Midnighttonight 00:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucky.  When I was in middle- and high-school the only game they had/allowed on the computers was Oregon Trail and Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego.  I since hated anything to do with history and geography with a passion D:  --I am not good at running 00:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Were they any good?

message: No one seems to have brought up the suggestion to merge, so I figured I would here. Having played through these levels, I would agree with the proposition to merge. I've made and played enough Doom levels to consider myself an expert, and quite frankly, these levels are notable only due to their creator. --Explodicle 04:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion
Talk:Edward A'Beckett

message: I wonder if these 4 are from the same family?  I would assume so given the name, and if so, it's a bit of a dynasty.  They're all Victorian I noticed. -- Moondyne 07:59, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And possibly related to Sir William à Beckett. -- Moondyne 02:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ibrahim Ferrer

message: Ths article says he is, but Eliades Ochoa is much younger, and Omara Portuondo is younger by a few years. Is it meant that he is the youngest member of the ORIGINAL club in Havana? - AKeen 18:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youngest member of the Buena Vista Social Club?
Talk:Nir Klinger

message: the picture copyright --84.228.67.67 08:04, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Japanese manual syllabary

message: The long vowel in kō (indicated in katakana by a long line) is shown by moving the sign ko downward.
Does that only apply to kō, or to all kana?  And if so, how is it combined with the other diacritics?  For example, how would gō be made?  In a diagonal line, or a "7" shape?  And how would pō be written? Nik42 (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It applies to all: "long vowels move downwards" in the previous paragraph. As for your second question, it's a sequence, not simultaneous. I forget exactly, but I believe you make the two movements in the order consonant-vowel (that is, side-down for gō). kwami (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Vowel question 

message: Someone should post a picture (I don't have a username/password here) that has all the yubimoji. One of such images can be found here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.38.244.81 (talk) 11:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full yubimoji
Wikipedia talk:Defending article quality

message: There's nothing with this editing guideline per se. The only thing I worry about is that if someone is entrenched enough in Wikipedia to get to this guideline page, then they already when to edit and when not to edit, so the guideline is "obvious" to them and ends up seeming like instruction creep. (This is true of several other policy/guideline pages btw). Pcb21| Pete 14:36, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2p from me

message: I 'patrol' all FAs I contributed to. I'd have thought that most users would do the same. Thus only FAs created by missing Wikipedians are in real need of patrol.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this done already? 

message: Besiki Stvilia is now at Florida State University.  His home page links to his "Information Quality Discussions in Wikipedia," and I believe this is the same paper as that with the dead link. Dgorsline (talk) 19:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repairing the dead link for the Stvilia paper 

message: could be mentioned in this essay. Toccata quarta (talk) 21:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA watchlist
Talk:Cognizant

message: Yup... it's an Edit War. 
I don't know what some of you are trying to prove here but the company was incorporated in the USA... not India. The law could care less where the employees live... it's where its legal entity is registered. Cognizant is an American corporation. Take your wishful thinking somewhere else. Netweezurd (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Nationality
Talk:State Trading Organization

message: could somebody do the following edits for me? (am still not very familiar with Wiki editing).
#The Company Infobox (some categories needs to be blank)
#Section 3 and 4 in a more presentable form
any help would be gratefully appreciated. User:Fizan
:Most certainly... --Oblivious 09:41, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rashad McCants

message: I know that the recent (June 2014) and highly-publicized allegations by McCants that he took "sham" classes at UNC with Coach Roy Williams knowledge is a magnet for vandalism, but I also think they deserve at least some mention in this article. Obviously it needs to be worded in a neutral, objective fashion - his accusations haven't been proven and have been denied by Roy Williams and most of his former UNC teammates - but to leave out these accusations would appear to be a huge omission in an article about McCants, and it does need to be mentioned somewhere in the article, with citations from newspapers or a reputable website. Just a thought. 184.3.105.42 (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 2014 UNC Allegations?
Talk:Nastasha Romanenko

message: I was not aware that Natasha was a member of Philanthrapy. Is this true? Also i know from the Previous Missions Story "In the Darkness of Shadow Moses" that Natasha was asked by Richard Ames of the DIA to join NEST for a single mission, should this make her affiliated to them on a seemingly permement bases if not even the DIA are mentioned? -- The Pain 09:06, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliations
Talk:Lisa Stansfield

message: ok where was Lisa born? was it Manchester or Lancashire? They are two separate entities, being a native Mancunian I'd know this.
199.101.62.55 (talk) 03:06, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth place 

message: Stansfield was not born in Rochdale, she was born right in Manchester itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.111.120.74 (talk) 23:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  not rochdale
Talk:Little Theatre (Rochester, New York)

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi folks.  I took a picture of the Little on Saturday, before I knew the copyright status of the image already on this article was being resolved.  I wanted to make sure we had a free image to use.  Below is a gallery showing both images; which one is better for this article?  (see also discussion at Talk:Rochester, New York#Image choice - Little Theatre  Powers T 20:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image choice 
Talk:East Australian Current

message: This map shows many flows which are at twice that speed.  (90cm.s = 1.7kts - the map shows upto 3kts):  http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/forecasts/idyoc300.shtml?region=SEQLD&forecast=Current#  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.130.201.235 (talk) 03:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  90cm/s seems wrong (mentioned in the intro as the fastest it flows)
Category talk:Hoaxes in science

message: Why is there a description of a specific hoax in this category description? Shouldn't it instead give a broad overview and description of what scientific hoaxes are? mennonot 09:19, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The above was referring to an old revision in :Category:Scientific hoaxes which has since been deleted. -- œ™ 20:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: (untitled)

message: I propose creating a new subcategory, :Category:Medical hoaxes (or :Category:Hoaxes in medicine?) Some possible entries are List of cancer victim hoaxes, Cello scrotum, and Penis captivus among others. -- œ™ 20:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New subcategory - Medical hoaxes
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 August 8

message: Hey, I've been going through this page and for some reason it appears in Category:Newgrounds and I wanted to know why as its quite odd seeing as this page doesn't really have anything to do with Newgrounds.com. --86.139.212.101 23:57, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the page in Category:Newgrounds
Talk:Siniša Vuco

message: Vuco's best song is 'Volim narodno' or 'I love folk music', which he sang with the serbian folk singer Mitar Miric in 2003. The song became an instant HIT in Croatia, Bosnia and Serbia. It sings about how the same folk music strongly connects the people in these countries, people which belongs to the same ethnicity, besides all religious divisions. Long live Vuco!
The link to the song is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRgrBjOrgwE&feature=related
Enjoy, cheers!24.86.127.209 (talk) 05:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vuco's 'Volim Narodno' ( 'I love folk music' ) 

message: Here is article on  croatian web portal Index.hr about this article! It's published in 2005, but nevertheless. Unfortunately only in Croatian.
--Gdje je nestala duša svijeta (talk) 18:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper article in Crotian 

message: There are currently no fewer than 10 separate articles about his albums, each containing little more than a track listing. Per WP:NALBUMS these are suitable candidates for merging here. Timbouctou (talk) 21:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded some articles a bit, therefore I disagree with merge.--Gdje je nestala duša svijeta (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles may be expanded but they still have no sources and fail to meet WP:NALBUMS – I think they should be deleted and redirected to this article. Richard3120 (talk) 04:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

text: None of the articles claim notability and are in fact substubs, with barely any info beyond track listing. Some have recently been redirected/merged; they might as well all be. GregorB (talk) 12:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums - merge discussion
Talk:640k barrier

message: The first PC operating system to integrate such technology was Windows 2.0. Windows 2.0 was not an operating system. Windows didn't become an OS until Windows 4 (95/98) But then, if it allowed access to extended memory while the underlying OS didn't, it wasn't a shell either. --Taejo 09:36, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled