Talk:Nik Kershaw

message: Is the .ogg file of Nik's song "The Riddle" a copyright infringement, and if so, shouldn't it be removed? -dvs- 21:29, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Samples

message: Some years ago I read that Nik was a monster guitarist - there even were comparisons with Holdsworth, that sort of thing - but he went down the pop music path instead. Is this true, and are there any particular tracks that really highlight his guitar playing?
--
Kershaw is / was a massive Holdsworth fan (along with the late Alan Murphy). There are many tracks that highlight his playing, but from his recent release, "You've Got To Laugh" "Promises, Promises" highlights his typical soloing style. BenedictPoole 14:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitar playing ability

message: Does anyone know if Nik actually produced "The One and Only" and played the solo on it? The style sounds very much like his playing technique.
Thanks
--
The guitar playing is Kershaw, yes (including the solo). He also performs backing vocals. I don't know about the production credit BenedictPoole 14:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solo on "The one and only" 

message: This is inaccurate. It does contain some, though maybe not enough. - NickS (talk) 22:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That tag doesn't literally mean there are exactly zero references; it just means that there aren't enough. Xihr (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The refimprove tag is better, though now the number of references is tending towards zero. Some citations seem to have been lost in the last year or so, possibly in the removal of text that has been considered irrelevant, "fancruft", or POV. Q: is citing autobiographical information considered POV? i.e. citing interviews or the artist's own website? NickS (talk) 11:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's acceptable if the information cited is uncontroversial and isn't inherently point-of-view; e.g., citing the subject himself about his birthdate should not present a problem; citing him about how important his contributions to music are (say) would surely be problematic. Xihr (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This article does not cite any references or sources. (December 2007)" 

message: Near the bottom of "Career" section.
What year was that? 
A date would be more useful info as time passes. 213.173.165.130 (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's likely that careless editing removed the context for the comment. Actually, it reads fine.  The year (2006) is mentioned two sentences earlier.  In context, it reads coherently. Xihr (talk) 00:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This year(?) also saw the digital re-release of his 1980s back catalogue... 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Nik Kershaw.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: This sentence in the opening paragraph made me go "huh??" -- "His 62 weeks on the UK Singles Chart in 1984 beat all other soloists.[2]" Now granted I've been accused of being a few cows short of a rodeo before, but how can it be 62 weeks in 1984 when there are only 52 weeks in a calendar year? Sector001 (talk) 00:22, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing they mean his singles made 62 appearances in the weekly charts (say, one single charted for 20 weeks and another for 42 weeks). Could certainly bee expressed better.Doctorhawkes (talk) 03:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange new calendar? 

message: A tag saying "this section requires expansion" was added to the Personal life section in Aug 2014. Is this still needed? what else would people expect to be in this section?— Rod talk 17:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion tag on personal life section 

message: Substituted at 01:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Nik Kershaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for //www.nikkershaw.net/darkglasses.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The current list has Genesis but not Tony Banks. Recommend removing Genesis and adding Tony Banks. NK composed and recorded three songs on a Tony Banks solo album so the latter is an associated act. But NK has never worked with Genesis. He worked with ex-Genesis guitarist Steve Hackett (already listed) on a Hackett album called Genesis Revisited II, which had nothing to do with Genesis as a band - he just sang an old Genesis song. Surely covering a song doesn't make that song's original artist an associated act, others covers singers like Rod Stewart, Westlife etc. would have a pile of them. Hackett left Genesis in 1977 and has done 25 solo albums since, so he's far more a solo artist than an ex-Genesis man, despite what some might prefer to see him as.ToaneeM (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated acts 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion