lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Armored Core (video game)

message: I sourced the PlayStation release date from MobyGames due to a lack of consensus on release dates across the net. Dates for the re-releases is directly sourced from Sony. On the fence if VGChartz should be used for Sales figures since no other sources can be found. I removed the Development section until something more substantial than Shoji Kawamori's involvement can be written. Once GameRankings has fully completed its migration to Metacritic, the review section should probably be changed over. The Famitsu reference is broken, it'll need to be fixed at some point, but I see no harm in leaving the score on there for now. There are also two weird EGM sources, both from the same year that I suspect might be from the same issue, but since the second one doesn't have a ton of information it may be difficult to verify (since I don't own any EGM issues from that year). Either way they should be checked out and either merged or have their references expanded for better clarity. —  seadoubleyoujay [talk] [海倍君ジェイ] 00:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated reply, but no, that's definitely not the same EGM source. Like most gaming mags, EGM typically covers the same game at least three times in the year of its release: At least one review (possibly more if the game came out for multiple platforms), at least one preview, and usually a mention of a showing at a trade show or some other piece of news.--Martin IIIa (talk) 00:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Some notes about recent revision

message: It says this under a screenshot that seems to show a narrow linear tunnel.  Kind of funny.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.24.109.231 (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Armored Core's levels are extremely open"
Talk:Armored Core 2: Another Age

message: I have added the No More Links Template in an effort to quell the ongoing linkspam that this and related pages have been experiencing. Please see the Links to be Avoided page to learn what it is inappropriate to link to. 
Further addition of links without consensus in the talk page will be treated as spam and will be removed.Ninety (talk) 18:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:Daniel Cudmore

message: Could someone please supply this article with a better clearer photo of the subject? -- Jalabi99 10:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo, please? 
Talk:Disaster Report

message: At the moment, this article only has one game ending. When I played it, I thought there was only one ending. GameFAQs has discussions and guides saying that this game has multiple endings!
Apparently by doing certain actions, a 'True' ending can be unlocked where everyone dies: rather depressing, and apparently un-canonical, as these same people are alive in the sequel! If this is true (can't see why not), it should be mentioned somewhere.
EDIT: Apparently there are seven endings: One 'normal' and 'true' ending for each companion at the end of the game (making 4 endings), and three earlier endings (if, for example, you get on the rescue chopper halfway through the game yourself).
JaffaCakeLover (talk) 12:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  True ending?
Talk:Fullmetal Alchemist 3: Kami o Tsugu Shōjo

message: I propose this page should be Moved to "Fullmetal Alchemist 3: The Girl who Surpasses God" because as this is an English Encyclopedia, we should use an English name, whether it's official or not.Moocowsrule (talk) 03:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Opposed. If there is no official English name, we use the romanization per Wikipedia naming guidelines and the MoS. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well then why don't we use "Gekijōban Naruto: Shippūden" rather than "Naruto Shippūden the Movie"? There's no official English title for that. It's a translation. Same with "Naruto: Shippūden the Movie 2: Bonds" rather than "Gekijōban Naruto Shippūden 2 Kizuna", there's no official English title for that either. This page used to be "Fullmetal Alchemist 3: The Girl who Surpassed God", but it got moved...Moocowsrule (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems I slightly misspoke. When there is no official English name, we use the most common name. Being a video game, that would still be the romanization, not an English title. For the films, both of those articles are incorrectly named, but that has no bearing here. Just because another article has an error does not mean you replicate it elsewhere. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 12:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By Google search the most popular was Fullmetal Alchemist 3, but that refers to not only the video game, but anything that has to do with FMA. But I guess you were right, according to Google the most popular result is FMA 3 Kami o Tsugu Shoujo, so you've won this round... I guess I should stop trying to argue with somebody who has more experience than me...Moocowsrule (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, its one way to gain more experience :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal
Talk:Dove's Guide for Church Bell Ringers

message: I have now put this in nonfiction-book-stub rather than lit-stub.
I am finding it hard to fit it in to an existing stub category. It is both a printed book and an online database. It is a reference directory rather than prose. It is certainly non-fiction. Bell ringing could be considered a recreational past-time (hobby), a civic duty, or a religious duty.
Oosoom 18:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: This article is about a book, the title of which is 
A Bellringer's Guide to the Church Bells of Britain by Ronald H. Dove.
:Out of curiosity, I wonder what the title page of the 8th edition (2000), published not by Dove but by the CCCBR, looks like. Doops |  talk 19:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cover images moved to article to conform with Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Policy. Oosoom Talk to me 10:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of book
Talk:Louise Woodward case

message: Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
Add (currently missing) citation to the following sentence to the second paragraph in the 'Aftermath' section of the article: "Matthew's parents filed a civil lawsuit to prevent Woodward from earning any profits from selling her story."
Cf2022 (talk) 04:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  She lost the case by default, therefore she was banned from profiting from her story: see page 99 of this paper. Ferkijel (talk) 19:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional source

message: This article can't seem to make up its mind whether it uses American English or British English. I'm seeing both "defense" (US) and "defence" (UK), for example. A user unilaterally tagged the page as en-UK without explanation (I'm removing it pending consensus), and changed one "defense" into "defence". There's also the date order: at top it says DDMMYYYY, but in US custom it's MM/DD/YYYY. I realize it's complex because both sides have ties to the topic, but since the article is about the case, which took place entirely in the United States, and not about Ms. Woodward herself, I would suggest switching this page to American English. Paris1127 (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The person at the centre of this article is a British citizen, living in the UK for the vast majority of her life, therefore, British English should be the overall default language of this article.  However, it is very important to use American English for those specific parts which refer to the deceased child and the subsequent legal trial(s) - the court case was conducted in the USA under American law.  Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: American or British English?
Talk:National Public Toilet Map

message: Screenshot/image would be sexy, for this article - seems lacking without Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 19:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice, ta...though I'm curious why you felt web-screenshot wasn't a fair image tag?  Not an expert myself, but it seems the most obvious to my mind. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 22:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't take a webshot but downloaded an image prepared by Albury City Council.  :Template:Web-screenshot states "This tag is not appropriate for images and media found on websites, it should be used for screenshots of websites only."  Albury City Council probably prepared the image with a screen web shot but I thought I wouldn't go there :-) --A Y Arktos\talk 22:37, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: What a wonderful idea! I'm all for it, but please tell me what does it mean a toilet with/without accessibility. If a toilet is not accessbile, why should it get on the map? and if it means accessibility for those of us who have mobility problems, why doesn't it say so directly?
also useful, for politicians at least, would be an indication of the places appropriate for those with verbal diarrhoea...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.143.76.8 (talk • contribs) 02:46, 17 April 2006   (UTC+10 hours)
*I have wikiliked the article on accessibility.--A Y Arktos\talk 20:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility 

message: The title of this page should be changed to "Australian National Public Toilet Map".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.53.5 (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The current title is supported by the references. --Melburnian (talk) 02:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Romance of the Three Kingdoms IX (game)

message: how come there is a separate article for rotk ix? aren't they the same?? Chensiyuan 05:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the same. Yes, they should be merged. _dk 07:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the information from the duplicate article, see Talk:Romance of the Three Kingdoms IX.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Romance of the Three Kingdoms X

message: Is there a NA release of this game ??
Yes there is. Its called Romance of the three kingdoms X
It's only for the PS2 in NA unfortunately.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.91.88 (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American Release ? 

message: What's a power up kit? Are they just another word for expansion packs? 122.108.1.135 (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. _dk (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Power Up Kit
Talk:Joel on Software (weblog)

message: This "article" appears to be part of a set of self-promotional articles (see Joel on Software).  In my opinion, it can probably be deleted.  Does anyone else have an opinion? --Elonka 19:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: I agree, the various articles should all be merged into the Joel Spolsky article, and then turned into redirects. --Elonka 18:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Schauder basis

message: The article currently states that "Every complete set of vectors is total, but the converse need not hold in an infinite-dimensional space."  Total is defined, but complete is not.  In what sense is complete being used here?  Heil, in his "Basis Theory Primer," defines both complete and total as the linear span being dense in the space, or the closed linear span equalling the full space.
Nym6433 (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too, I wanted to ask about this. What is a complete set? Maybe we should delete this statement... --Txebixev (talk) 10:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete vs. Total 

message: Can someone add an example or at least give a heuristic justification for how such spaces can exist? 203.167.251.186 (talk) 20:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already a piece of answer in this page: It took 40 years for Enflo to come up with the counterexample -- so its not easy. Actually Enflo gave a counterexample to the approximation problem, not directly to the basis problem.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdmy (talk • contribs) 22:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  thank you for your answer, that sounds esoteric indeed! I will look this reference up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.167.251.186 (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separable spaces without bases 

message: :"It follows from the Banach–Steinhaus theorem that the linear mappings {Pn} defined by
:: v = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \alpha_k b_k \ \ \overset{\textstyle P_n}{\longrightarrow} \ \ P_n(v) = \sum_{k = 0}^n \alpha_k b_k
:are uniformly bounded by some constant C."
No, this is incorrect, since at this moment we do not know yet that P_n are continuous.
Looking at a survey
:C. W. McARTHUR, "DEVELOPMENTS IN SCHAUDER BASIS THEORY", BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 78, Number 6, November 1972 
I see on page 878 that the notion called "Schauder basis" in our article is called "(topological) basis" by McArthur. A Schauder basis, according to McArthur, is a special case of a biorthogonal system. The distinction is that, according to McArthur, coefficient functionals v\mapsto\alpha_n are continuous by definition for a Schauder basis, but not for a (topological) basis.
:"Banach [6, p. 111] showed that the coefficient functionals of a basis for a Banach space are necessarily continuous, i.e., a basis for a Banach space is a Schauder basis." (McArthur, p. 878)
:[6]. S. Banach, Théorie des opérations linéaires, Monografie Mat., PWN, Warsaw, 1932; reprint, Chelsea, New York, 1955. MR 17, 175.
Thus, restricing ourselves to Banach spaces, we may treat these two notions of basis as a single notion. And still, the phrase "It follows from the Banach–Steinhaus theorem..." is incorrect; an additional argument (provided by Banach) is needed, and is far not self-evident. Or else we should replace the definition.
Boris Tsirelson (talk) 07:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please! Boris Tsirelson (talk) 09:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schauder basis versus topological basis
Talk:Retractable hardtop/merger archive

message: ====Yea (3)====
* zappa per Morven
* Stude62
* Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 05:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: * zappa per Morven
* Stude62
* Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 05:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yea (3)

message: If merged, on which page will the article be located?  -zappa 00:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Main article
Talk:André Kolingba

message: ...if anyone here has access to one. --(Mingus ah um 19:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Picture Would be Nice
Talk:Ange-Félix Patassé

message: ...if anyone out there has access to one. --(Mingus ah um 19:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Picture Would Be Nice
Talk:Richie Kotzen

message: Richie Kotzen was born on February 3, 1972, according to IMDB [link:http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1149529/]
Can someone take away the red letters from the "Poison" box at the very end?(71.96.247.85 00:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The subject of this article has confirmed in  that his birthplace is in fact Reading, Pennsylvania, and not "Birdsboro", which keeps getting inserted into the article. Any changes which alter the subject's birth place should be reverted. - Mark 09:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Support Split - Discography is long in relation to the article and should be split to a new article entitled Richie Kotzen discography.  Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richie Kotzen discography
Talk:Causewayed enclosure

message: The section "Function" should (imho) be deleted entirely, as it consists only of unreferenced suggestions,  assumptions, and speculation. Added: It seems this has been so since 2007 or 2009, seven-to-nine years ago now... some kind of action may be long overdue. clsc (talk) 16:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a terrible idea. Sorry to be so emphatic, but it's an important issue. Why not search for some (redcent) sources that discuss possible functions, eg etc? Doug Weller talk 18:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove Function Section? 

message: *1. The two given examples of Neolitic sites are discrete groups differentiated by construction and theorised use. Perhaps a link should be included, connecting the two, as items of potentially similar interest. But I would be against going so far as to make them out to be one in the same.
*2. Causewayed camps and circular ditches are, I believe, different. --Dumbo1 17:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Against the Merger of Articles 'Causewayed Enclosure' and 'Circular Ditches'

message: Do not merge: From the description given, the ditches seem to be quite different from causewayed enclosures.  Whereas the enclosures were raised earthenworks of unknown (if generally defensive) uses, the circular ditches were, well, ditches, and the article doesn't provide any known function.  Additionally, if the circular ditches were from the Linear Ceramic culture, which flourished through ~4500 BC, and the causewayed enclosures were being made until ~3000 BC, it sounds like they were from different cultures.  However, the circular ditches article definitely needs cleanup and expansion.  —Ryan McDaniel 21:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the Merger of Articles 'Causewayed Enclosure' and 'Circular Ditches'

message: Specifically,Rams Hill and Zambujal are definitely not causewayed enclosures.
In general, this needs a lot of work, as many of the generalisations are inaccurate (unsurprisingly, given the narrow range of sources).  For example, the Danish and Swedish examples aren't on hilltops, and many of the more recently discovered British examples aren't either.  Hopefully someone with the time will start with Niels Andersen's work, e.g. his article in The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe and go from there.European Prehistorian (talk) 12:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sites and general thoughts 

message: A 2409:4064:E10:B942:0:0:6C8:B60F (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi
Talk:Kinmen National Park

message: The category "National Parks of Taiwan" is clearly about all parks of the ROC, not a restrictive definition of Taiwan as the island.  Thus, I am reverting Instantnood.  I fully expect him to go change the definition of the category now, and remove other non-Taiwan Island parks. SchmuckyTheCat 21:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Taiwan is not restrictive to the island of Taiwan, but Orchid Island, Green Island, the Pescadores, etc., as well. — Instantnood 21:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: National Parks of Taiwan
Talk:Shei-Pa National Park

message: 76.92.217.124 (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  shei-pa or xueba? 

message: pinyin: Suěbà Guójiā Gōngyuán
Mention what kind of Pinyin.
Mention how to spell it in Hanyu Pinyin.
Mention how in the world it became to be spelled Shei-Pa.
Jidanni (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinyin
Talk:WREK-FM

message: I think there are several ways this article could be expanded.  Perhaps someone currently at WREK with access to the History binder (does that still exist?) could help:
* Mention of the Live@WREK CD release
* Notable interviews and live performances
* Community activities, notable WREK sponsored shows, etc
* WREKology?
* Mentions in the press, such as Jon Kincaid's Best DJ in creative loafing whatever year that was
* The WREK logo, photos of the studio (especially the coliseum studio; the 360 view from the Live@WREK liner notes would be great)
Pokerriot 19:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Content Ideas
Talk:Akamba

message: Don't these two articles cover the same thing? My suggestion is to merge it here (instead of Kamba) since Akamba means the Kamba people and Kamba is more general term meaning either people on Kamba language (Kikamba). At least that's how I understand it. Kamba article could be transformed into a disambiguation page. Julius Sahara 19:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Kamba 

message: I agree that Akamba and Kamba entries have to be merged. But I disagree about the direction of merge. I think the primary article should be under 'Kamba' with 'Akamba' being a redirection to 'Kamba'. See other examples of similar listings such as Swahili instead of Kiswahilii. Kĩkũyũ instead of Agikuyu, etc. -- Thaths 22:52, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I disagree
Talk:Forbidden (band)

message: Shouldn't the demo "Trapped" be mentioned in the article?
Howeworth (talk) 14:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demo "Trapped" 
Talk:Copper Family

message: I have rewritten this article and listed the sources used to do so as per the clean-up request. Ac@osr 19:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Playing the Fool

message: I don't recall if my LP is Canadian or US. (I don't have easy access to it.) Giant was popular here, especially in Quebec, so Canadian issues were normal. Varlaam (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian LP? 

message: The songs from Octopus were listed as Excerpts from Octopus on the original double LP issues, and likely on all or nearly all first-generation LP copies, both the sleeve and the labels. The individual songs were not listed for that track, though they may have been indicated on some later reissues including some CD editions. 
The individual songs are The Boys in the Band - Knots - The Advent of Panurge with a hammond organ/piano bridge section by Minnear between the two latter songs, the bridge being about a minute in length. 83.254.154.164 (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octopus track
Talk:List of statutory instruments of the United Kingdom, 1972

message: I just spotted an SI in the 1972 list that appears to be either misnumbered, or has been placed in the wrong year. The SI in question is "Local Government &c. (Northern Ireland) Order 1972 S.I. 1971/1999 (N.I. 22)". Is it a 1971 order or a 1972 order? The title and its number do not match. Road Wizard 19:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misplaced SI
Talk:Randy Newman (album)

message: This song has a rightful entry on the Dutch Wikipedia: :nl:Love Story (You And Me). 83.85.143.141 (talk) 21:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love Story (You And Me)
Talk:Jefferson Caffery

message: I note that Caffery is referred to as "a discreet homosexual" in Antony Beevor's Paris after the Liberation, 1944-1949, Rev. ed. (Penquin, 2004), p. 109.  Beever is a top-notch historian.  (See Beever's own Wikipedia entry.)  Whether this deserves mention in his article, I don't know. --Skb8721 (talk) 17:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More on Caffery's Sexual Orientation
Talk:Surjit Bindrakhia

message: Noxiousnews is vandalizing this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.87.82 (talk) 07:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking over the article, Noxiousnews' reasoning for the proposed deletion seems legitimate. There are few sources and none of them seem reliable. Also most of the article seems like puffery. If you have more sources or have a case for keeping it, this is the place to discuss it. HotshotCleaner (talk) 08:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism by Noxiousnews
Talk:Sardul Singh Kavishar

message: ^^
|| Bakaman Bakatalk 01:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The passages on Caveeshar's later political activity (in the Forward Bloc) is source in K. Bose's book Forward Bloc. --Soman 09:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs sources