Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation/SpongeBob SquarePants work group/Episode Improvement

message: i have removed the trivia from the spongebob episodes shown in the project page. as for if it was suggested, im not 100% sure. if it was needed, then i apoligize. Stormy41992 13:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are some things I would like to point out. WP:TRIV states that trivia sections should be avoided in articles. If a trivia section was added to an article, it would not help the article since it would be tagged with Template:Trivia. There is a difference between notability and importance. The last point I would like to make is that many of the things you listed in your comment sound like fancruft because thecontent is of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question. I hope that helps. Pants(T) 05:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Removed

message: Should Yahoo TV be counted as a source if a reception section is created? According to the website, 80% out of the 39 voters liked this episode.  Pants(T) 22:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen it used anywhere here, so I say no. TTN 22:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception for "Help Wanted?" 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  23:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review status

message: *If anyone has a DVD that includes this episode, it would be helpful to this article. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  23:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD

message: I have just thought of a new plan. Instead of attempting to improve the episodes one by one (in order), why not start improving the episodes that are most likely to have reliable sources, references, production details, and reception? Pilot (House) and Homer's Phobia are good examples of episode articles. Note that WP:WAF and WP:FICT apply to episode articles. Pants(T) 01:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try whatever you would like. Encyclopedic information is always good, and as long as it is produced, the method really doesn't matter. TTN 02:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I was thinking that also. We can start with special episodes such as Best Day Ever and Dunces and Dragons. -AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  22:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm...? What was that? RoryReloaded (talk) 21:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of plans? 

message: I have made some changes to the episode. This includes adding some references (one of them is to a press release and the other one is to a Washington Post Tom Shales review). Pants(T) 07:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, don't comment on this yet because I think I found another source that contains another review. . I am going to add it later. Pants(T) 07:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now users can comment on this. I believe it is enough to at least assert some notability. Pants(T) 19:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have You Seen This Snail update 

message: Why did you delete those episode articles so long ago? They were beautiful. Then, I come looking to see one... and I got a redirect! Now, the episode information is gone, and now we just see names of the episodes! I know you're trying to improve them, but when you deleted all of them Wikipedia lost so much data and articles! Why? RoryReloaded (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know! Pretty gay if you ask me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.38.225 (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?