lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Fulghum

message: Can someone pronounce this guy's name for me?  I'm stopped at the "gh"; is it a "gu" or an "eff?"
george@winnacker.com
Hmm... well I am a friend of his Grand-daughter from high school and I've had the ability to chat with the man as well as listen to a lecture by him. His last name is pronounced as far as I can articulate, Ful-ghum (kinda like the word jam) or alternatively Ful-gham. So I guess as you guess more of a gu sound. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DaBuschman (talk • contribs).
:Yep, I think he mentions "full-jum" and "fol jambre" in one of his books, if my memory is correct. It's meant to be derived from a Frech surname. --Kjoonlee 00:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Errm, so it's not a gu sound as in gust. --Kjoonlee 00:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be useful: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15679626, FYI.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dancing 

message: I added a sections tag because I think this article could do with being made more organized and having section headings added.  RJFJR (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/sections
Talk:Comparison of video editing software

message: It would be interesting to identify which editors allow for two monitors. 189.216.181.164 (talk) 18:44, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual-monitor 

message: There are three versions of Cinelerra, not just two. The purpose of and differences between each version are explained here. --TheBankery (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinelerra Versions 

message: This page looks way too complicated for me to edit directly, so someone please add YouTube Create to each of the tables: . Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube Create 

message: Free fire game play 37.111.135.85 (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   Free fire game video
Talk:Central Avenue

message: I know this page has already been deleted in the past, but, based on it having been reused already, I think there's some sort of need to place something less specific in this spot.  Rather than having it be used repeatedly to refer to one specific Central Avenue or another, we're probably better off with a disambiguation, at least to those places that other entries are trying to link to.  Recognizing that it could become quite messy, we still could use something here as a placeholder, if nothing else. Adbarnhart 18:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for disambiguation
Talk:Eden Valley Railway

message: First bridge after Kirkby Stephen over the Eden.. This book page 107 says it had two spans, whereas this page 607 says it had three. The bridge is the Musgrave viaduct. I think both books are supposed to be talking about the original viaduct. There's this image http://www.flickr.com/photos/pinzac55/3238970303/ but I don't think that is the original - it looks like a post 1900 NER replacement. Does anyone know which is right? 94.72.239.127 (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Viaduct confusion
Talk:Spoils system

message: This article has been included as part of the series on Andrew Jackson, but is much more general than his presidency. As another topic pointed out, it is not specific to the U.S., let alone Jackson's presidency. Including it under Andrew Jackson is somewhat ignorant of that fact. Allbirdsareedible (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Jackson series
Talk:History of music publishing

message: This article is in need of a major rewrite/cleanup. I have begun work on this, and plan to continue. Much of the material on copyright can be deleted and linked to History of copyright. Any help/comments appreciated.  --Goodmanjaz 19:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite/cleanup

message: This article has a point of view problem. 
Although it correctly records that copyright was created in order to protect the profits of publishers through monopoly or cartel, it goes on to make the usual disconnect that it was created "to safeguard the rights of a composer". No support is given for that statement. For balance, there should be some mention of the many 20th century composers (in popular music genres) who have told stories of signing away rights for low lump sums or small percentages.
Calling the establishment of performing rights fees an "honor" is POV. The very concept was new in the 18th century. How it gained popular and legal support should be told. In particular, SACD and SACEM were formed as virtually labor unions for writers, and how they were transformed into arms of the publishing industry would be interesting to record.  Similarly the dispute over ASCAP that led to the formation of BMI definitely should be described here.
I agree about deferring most of copyright history to pages about copyright, but some mention of the pressure by the music and movie industries to extend copyright to very lengthy terms belongs here.
JoeBrennan (talk) 18:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral point of view

message: Re: "Elizabeth I ... Later, King Henry VIII" -- Elizabeth was after Henry! AnonMoos (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronological problem

message: This section is lacking some very important information and gives a bias which would not be present if more information was covered. 
It suggests that modern music printing started around 1754. This simply if vastly inaccurate. The article also fails to completely mention John Walsh, John Playford and his sons and so on.
John Playford's English Dancing Master was a publishing phenomenon - its first edition published in 1651 it was so popular it went on to be published in 18 editions, with  two subsequent volumes each with multiple editions all being printed up until 1728.
See John Playford. 
Also see John Walsh
Music publishing in England at this time was significant and prolific.
Barryspearce (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginnings of Modern Music publishing? 

message: The first figure gives 1470 as one of the last dates for a hand-copied manuscript. This cannot be true since for most types of music to be played by professional musicians, hand copying was the norm through the baroque period, whereas music for amateurs (wider market) was printed much earlier. Competition between printers and copyists in the 18th century is well-documented.  --♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ (talk) 15:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First figure
Talk:Anne, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arunah Shepherdson Abell

message: Birth date differs from Find-A-Grave. Lincher 18:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article's name appears to be correct, but just in case, I wanted to make a note here because Britannica indicates the name is "Arunah Shepardson Abell". 42engineer (talk) 01:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Article provides no support or source for claim that he was a philanthropist. Descendants set up the charitable foundation.Parkwells (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Philanthropist?
Talk:Hektor's death

message: This piece is amateur, and there's no reason for a separate entry for his death. Nuke it!65.213.117.15 19:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unhappy with the entry 

message: I added some wiki links, changed spelling to Hector, added a link to amphora image. Occuserpens 19:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry update
Talk:Piotr Skarga

message: Why polish? he was lithuanian!!!!
:Cite your sources.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe his Lithuanian name version should be writhen in  brackets and we should me a redirect M.K 23:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: P.Skarga was not lithuanian but he made huge contribution to lithuania, so i added his name in LT language too M.K 11:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

text: With all due respect, Shakespeare made even more tremendous impact on Lithuanian culture, yet we don't add Viljamas Šekspyras to the article on William Shakespeare. //Halibutt 14:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Shakespeare had nothing to do with Lithuanian culture. Skarga lived and worked in Vilnius University, Lithuania. Also at the time Lithuania and Poland were united into one state. They really cannot be compared. Lithuanian name version is nearly as important as the Polish and should be mentioned. --88.119.185.29 (talk) 13:37, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Trigg Ester Library

message: Editorial COI notice: I've created and made miscellaneous edits to this page; I am a librarian at the Ester library. However, I have attempted to maintain a neutral point of view in working on this page. Deirdre (talk) 21:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been updated to reflect current facilities and activities at the library. 216.67.118.152 (talk) 01:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christ Community Church

message: The article name should be changed to the full name Christian Catholic Apostolic Church (which now is, confusingly, a redirect to the Flat Earth Society). Afterwards, Christian Catholic Church should become a disambig. page which points to Christian Catholic Apostolic Church and Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, which are two totally unrelated churches. --Zumbo 19:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hurricane Danny (1985)

message: Uhh, why does this storm have an article? It didn't do that much and there isn't a terrible amount of information here (reminds me of Cindy of '05; which shouldn't have an article either, but we won't go there). -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 02:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason why I didn't merge it right away (after seeing your notice) was due to the damage total. If more specifics can be found regarding what the storm did, especially if anything notable, then this article could stay. It is very iffy currently, and without a lot of work it will probably be merged. Hurricanehink 04:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think this should stay, mainly due to the tornado outbreak. 39 tornadoes spawned by the storm is pretty notable to me, as that also appears on the List of notable Atlantic hurricanes. The content is barely passable, and still needs more, but it is getting there. Also, I believe the tornado information should be its own section. You should cover the wind and rain damage in one section, followed by a tornado sub-section. Hurricanehink 16:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

text: From a notability standpoint, $200m 2005USD and basically no deaths is a toss-up.  From a content standpoint, the article is solid.  From a quality standpoint, it needs a lot of work (for instance I'm sure there have been at least 5 hurricanes to make landfall along the gulf coast). — jdorje (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am assuming this is no longer being proposed to be merged. YE  Pacific Hurricane 18:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Religion in Nigeria

message: Opening any article with a claim that muslims are rapidly outbreeding the christian population and replacing makes me question the editors motives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.56.67 (talk) 00:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dogwhistle?

message: A lot of the info in some of the Christianity subsections is unsourced. Qxu21 (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced material  

message: In Combination with traditional practices in the larger Christianity section, the except "However Christianity cannot be done with traditional practices ... a mixture of the both of them neither Christianity nor African Traditional Religion." appears to be either personal opinion which violates NPOV, or a factual claim without references. If no solution is provided to this, this except must be erased from the article. Factthinker (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicious claim in 'Combination with traditional practices'
Talk:7th Toronto Regiment, RCA

message: The World War II paragraph is written in short form that is not understandable to most readers. Please rewrite for the general public. Several paragraphs below this also use too many shortened words and acronyms. 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.167.172 (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:8th Canadian Hussars (Princess Louise's)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 8th Canadian Hussars (Princess Louise's). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140512231549/http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2014/05/09/south-west-asia-theatre-honours to http://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2014/05/09/south-west-asia-theatre-honours
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada (Princess Louise's)

message: The use of belts on regimental cap badges has been discouraged by heraldry experts. The 48th Highlanders, I believe, had to change their cap badge to remove the belt buckle from their cap badge design. I've therefore edited out reference to "belt" in the armorial description of the cap badge here. I believe annulus is the correct description - defined in mathematics as "a ring-shaped geometric figure". A belt would necessarily include a buckle which the Argyll cap badge obviously lacks. 139.48.25.61 (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regimental Cap Badge does not have a belt 
Talk:British Columbia Dragoons

message: Please note that the official name is The British Columbia Dragoons. 
--Ng.j 00:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 
Talk:Brockville Rifles

message: I removed the Appointments section as it was unsourced. It should not be added back without a reliable source, although I question the encyclopedic value of including it at all. It seems more appropriate for their own website. Schazjmd (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appointments 
Talk:Canadian Grenadier Guards

message: Reverted to last edit by User:Bluebot. The subsequent edit removed the reference to the CGG as a Household regiment, and its wording seemed to imply they were "pretend" soldiers (unintentionally, I assume). SigPig 17:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion 26 May 06

message: Reverted motto to "Honi soit..." as that is the actual motto of the CGG.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.182.6 (talk) 23:54, 29 January 2015‎
:Not according to the Directorate of History and Heritage.  Hamish59 (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision 26 January 15
Talk:Canadian Guards

message: The regiment had two reserve battalions, the article is missing that information. The two reserve battalions were the 5th Battalion formed by the Governor General's Foot Guards and the 6th Battalion formed by The Canadian Grenadier Guards. Amqui (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: GGFG and CGG were affiliated with the CG, but were not amalgamated into the CG. It was similar to how the Loyal Edmonton Regiment is affiliated with PPCLI, and LER has a PPCLI battalion number, but the LER is not really part of the PPCLI. Nevertheless it should be mentioned in the article. I should have time to do it in the next few days. Indefatigable (talk) 15:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reserve battalions 

message: The Royal Canadian Dragoons and The Royal Canadian Regiment ceased being school corps and became regiments in 1892. The Royal Canadian Horse Artillery, Royal Canadian Field Artillery and Royal Canadian Garrison Artillery were united into a single regiment, the Royal Canadian Artillery, in 1927, with English and French language units. All three of those regiments recruited from across the dominion before the Guards were a gleam in Guy Simonds's eye. So, to assert that "The Canadian Guards... was also the country's first national military regiment" is incorrect. It might be fairer to say, "The Canadian Guards not only served as the Household Division of Canada, but was also the country's first national infantry regiment with English- and French-speaking battalions." Ab.chaplin (talk) 13:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The country's first national military regiment?
Talk:Canadian Scottish Regiment (Princess Mary's)

message: I wanted to follow the Regiment through WWI, so I thought to wikify the Battle honors section.
This wasn't easy, and I'm afraid there might be some mistakes, caused by different names being used, no article on battle (so I used the village when needed), or articles with multiple battles in them, e.g Second Ypres.
I'd appreciate it, if somebody would check over the links to see if I came reasonably close!
I also thought that maybe a table might work better, which could include battle name, dates, geographical coordinates, and notes (e.g. EMBLAZONED, or alternative battle names).
Also I think some photos would greatly help this article.  I'm not sure it would be appropriate, but if anybody wants it (after some effort) I could get a pix of my grandfather in WWI, getting married in uniform (with kilt).  Smallbones (talk) 14:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle honors 

message: I am currently a member of 2422 RCACC, and have a picture of myself in full uniform. Should I upload it? 70.67.15.67 (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliated Cadet Corps Uniform 
Talk:Essex Scottish Regiment

message: The Essex Scottish Regiment → Essex Scottish Regiment — Move for consistency and per WP:NCD. RJASE1 23:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Pro-jekt

message: Good article Josh. But you forgot to say how hard they rock live. :)
Jack
I was going to mention the fact they started their recent tour in Barrow, but I didn't think I would get away with even that... Oh well! I only mentioned what they are currently doing as I knew, there wasn't anything about it on the source I was using... J Milburn 19:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well done. 

message: I originally cited them as a Darkwave / Gothic Rock band, and I think that should stand. I admit, originally I was calling them a 'Darkwave' Band completely of my own judgement, but since then they have featured in Metalhammer magazine, and there they were said to 'have a darkwave feel'. They are not Metal in any way, so I will remove that, but I can see the Electrogoth link. J Milburn 08:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone added that they fall under 'Rock Music'. That is very very vague, and I have never seen them described as that before. Have you a source? Everything else said can be sourced to the band website or Metal Hammer magazine. J Milburn 17:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A source? I have ears. And i can hear that there is no darkwave sound. It's modern electronic music with a rock music influence... maybe an industrial rock influence, nothing more... --Menorrhea 11:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: There is no need to patronise me. 'Rock' is very vague. Darkwave is rock- it is New Wave inspired Gothic rock. I would say that the best way to describe them is Electrogoth, but I have seen them described as darkwave, in Metal Hammer magazine. I agree with this, there is a definite darkwave sound to them. Irrelevent of what we think, Wikipedia rules state that there should be verifiable sources for what is said, and that we publish no original research. Until you can find a source specifically describing them as rock, it can not be written. J Milburn 20:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Darkwave is rock- it is New Wave inspired Gothic rock. *lol*? Firstly darkwave is an umbrella term, including guitar music, electronic music...whatever. the second thing is: darkwave isn't heavy metal. Completely irrelavant is the POV of this band. Today, any kiddy band calls its music as darkwave or goth. Here is the best example. --Menorrhea 19:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I am perfectly aware that many who call themselves genres are not them. Pro-jekt call themselves Gothic Metal, they blatantly are not. I am perfectly aware what darkwave is, and I am a fan of many of the bands that fall under it- Voltaire for instance, is not Electronic at all, and he is often described as Darkwave. This band is described as Darkwave in Metal Hammer magazine, has an Electrogoth sound and attitude, and describes itself as Gothic Metal. Anything you would like to add to that, rather than just vandalising the article? J Milburn 21:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Jacob Bassevi

message: I am a direct descendant of Jacob Bassevi von Treuenberg. Where did you find the name Schnules? I never heard of this name and it is not in the Encyclopedia Judiaca, nor is it in any manuscript that I have. Show me the proof or remove this from the name.
I think Wikepedia should be more organised and not everyone and their grandmother should be allowed to write whatever they want with out proof that they are historians.
:"Schnules" is from the book "Geschichte Böhmens; Von der slavischen Landnahme bis zur Gegenwart", Jörg K. Hoensch (C. H. Beck) (I bougght at Vienna). --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 03:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major errors in this article

message: This article has a few terms that seem anachronistic to me, most notably the section mentioning "other Jewish capitalists". I get the impression that this article was mostly translated from the German page, and perhaps better words could be used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelephant (talk • contribs) 04:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronisms?
Talk:Fort Garry Horse

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 19:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to that, I had a look at some Canadian insignia. Of what I've seen these units have "the" on their shoulder flash. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's worth noting the UK regiment article name is  Black Watch not 'The Black Watch'. It would seem silly for articles of the Canadian regiments to employ 'The' when the original UK regiments don't.--Labattblueboy (talk) 08:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 October 2022