lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Book stubs

message: How about a fiction stub? Or subcategory stubs by nationality of author (US-book-stub or US-fict-stub)? | Keithlaw 14:38, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals - SoM 14:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I entered both proposals here. Thanks. | Keithlaw 22:10, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

text: No problem with this. There are sub catagories which are populared just by changing the stub to s genre of novel - see the :Category:Book stubs. and you could make up a :Template:novel-stub as the ones arround it are set up and use that. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 10:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: This will make it easier to do with the autowikibrowser.Eagle (talk) (desk) 00:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. sorry, right now I am regex(ing) for biograhies and autobiograhies in this list. I have found 24 (approx. 1.4% of the articles in this category)articles that matched the criteria. These were placed in the correct stub category(thus no longer in the main category:Book stubs). Eagle (talk) (desk) 00:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: when i started work here (recently the arrangement was in disarray, still is really. I am steadily trying to work my way through it. I have left that one alone thinking that most of the titles could be transfered to "mystery-novel-stub" or left to remain as "non fiction" crime. I will move it now to no fiction anotated as work in progress. I will create a crime-novel-stub for those non mystery/detection stories. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 17:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reducing category size

message: I recommend the Categories and Subcategories below. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need new book categeries stubs 

message: Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category: Controversial literature]] 

message: Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Subcategories: Antisemitica]] 

message: Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Subsubcategories:Protocols of the Elders of Zion]]
Talk:Pons

message: (Inserted for readability. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pons strokes don't necessary cause death or loss of mental function. They may, if extensive, cause "locked-in syndrome", for which I suggest you Google if this is the case. Otherwise the cerebrovascular accident page covers most about strokes in general. I hope your brother will be doing better soon. Make sure they give him TED stockings and - if the stroke was not a bleed - prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparins. JFW | T@lk 07:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: (random heading)

message: Iff pons was named after a Varolius/Varolio or some such, his first name was for certain not "Pons", which is not a personal name at all. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 18:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pons" not a first name

message: There is no section alluding to the pons function. There should be a functional as well as structural and verbatim definition included.
Jason Ross 04:22, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for a section about physiology  

message: English 102.66.97.192 (talk) 22:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pons
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Michigan

message: For discussion of merge, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress#List of United States Senators from  X. -- 00:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been no further discussion on this merge for several weeks and no conclusive outcome. I'm removing the merge tags from the articles. older ≠ wiser 20:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.  I've proposed this on a few other states' pages, and the consensus seems to be to split into two pages: Senate, House.  Just FYI.  —Mark Adler (markles) 20:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I was one of those suggesting that a split would be preferable to a merge. older ≠ wiser 20:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Rulers of Hanover

message: I would propose to merge this article into Hanover (state)  (for the rulers) and into House of Hanover (for the heads of the House after 1866). It turns out that Hanover (state) has been duplicating some of the information for some time, so one would have to be careful when merging so that nothing gets lost. Comments? --Chl 14:51, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Straits of Mackinac

message: I expected to find "Strait of Mackinac", singular. I see that one might consider the eastward path to the south of Bois Blanc Island to be a strait and the northward path to the west of Mackinac Island to be straits as well. But the article identifies "Straits of Mackinac" a waterway (singular), the one spanned by the bridge, separating Lakes Michigan and Huron. The passages around the islands are already squarely in Lake Huron, as are the islands around which they lead. Am I being too technical/literal? Or is there a missing clarification or detail that would be worth elaborating on in the article? Largoplazo (talk) 20:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  StraitS? 

message: It needs to be corrected. We went through this discussion for two years on the Strait of Gibraltar page and it took proving that the three countries that bordered the strait (Spain, Morocco, and Gibraltar) refer to it in the singular to get it fixed. On that note, most of the so-called "straits" in the world are, in fact, a singular strait. There are some (Danish Straits and Turkish Straits, for example) that qualify to be plural as there are two distinct straits with a larger body of water separating them. The misuse of Straits is so prevalent in the body of pages on Wikipedia that it will take a bot to correct all the errors in the many pages where it arises. CarlitosCorazon 10:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed! 

message: The intro seems to contain contradictory information:
"The main strait flows under the Mackinac Bridge and connects two of the Great Lakes, Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. The main strait is 3 1⁄2 miles (5.6 kilometers) wide . . ." vs.
"The straits are five miles (8 km) wide at their narrowest point, where they are spanned by the Mackinac Bridge."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:405:4A00:4430:A4C6:3E2A:76F1:B4CD (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width of Strait
Talk:Fort Michilimackinac

message: Please don't change all of the occurrences of "Michilimackinac" to "Michimilimackinac"... mostly because it's completely incorrect. It's "Michilimackinac", as noted in the article's title and at ALL of the external links on the page, including those pointing to the official State of Michigan sites. I would consider such change as bordering on vandalism (or, best case, edits with no common sense -- after all, look at the title of the article!). Thanks. CBessert 22:36, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Michilimackinac, NOT Michimilimackinac

message: Is this the same article ? about the same topic ? Octopus-Hands 23:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as the articles describe, Fort Michilimackinac is an earlier fort built by the French on the mainland near present-day Mackinaw City. Fort Mackinac was built a bit later by the British on Mackinac Island. older ≠ wiser 15:46, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Fort Mackinac]]

message: How is Michilimackinac pronounced?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.185.253.158 (talk) 07:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Charter township

message: The article states that the board of seven officials is composed of three specific officials and either two or four others.  What happens if there are just two others — are there more specific officials, or are there just five officials total, or is it done otherwise?  Regardless, this should be fixed by someone who knows more than I do.  Nyttend 01:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated this. A charter township must have seven board members. General law townships can have either five or seven board members. I cited an MTA publication for this. The relevant statutes are dispersed through several sections of the Michigan Compiled Law and suffer from the typical deficiencies of legalistic language. older ≠ wiser 01:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Size of board

message: It's always been said that 'incorporating' a charter township allows greater protection against annexation by a city than, say, remaining a general law township, but it's never really explained why.  And, the more I try to figure out why, the more I come to the conclusion that 'protection against annexation' may not actually exist.  Can someone add or explain how simpling changing the number of members on a general law township's board and contracting out for services in any way protects against annexation by a city? --Criticalthinker (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proection against annexation

message: In the external links section is supposedly to the text for the "The Charter Township Act of 1947".  When you click on the link, however, it simply takes you to the 'search' page of the legislative website.  With no idea of the number of the original act, there is no way to find the text.  Can someone fix this? --Criticalthinker (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Charter Township Act of 1947
Talk:Michigan Senate

message: I added a small blurb about the orginaization, Im reluctant to add a link however, as do prevent it from becomming an endorsment.
Keeperoftheseal 01:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Unicameral Michigan' 

message: You cannot just keep reverting my original edit. There is nothing wrong with this article. Just because you don't like the fact that someone is correcting your inaccuracies, poor grammar and other mistakes. I removed a plethora of mistakes, which you keep trying to re-publish. Please follow Wikipedia rules and stop engaging in this edit war.75.129.106.189 (talk) 15:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *As with the Michigan House of Representatives article, you need to explain what is it you're arguing about in this article. This is a talk page for making suggestions and specific requests — not just pointing out what someone else might be doing wrong.  If there is an accuracy dispute, please explain more appropriately and others will be glad to give assistance and make corrections in the event that another editor is wrong. — ♣№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė♫♪ 19:43, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit war

message: Could there be some mention of how officers are chosen, particularly the president pro tempore?  I think i'd heard in passing that it's usually the longest-serving state senator of the majority party, but I have nothing to back that up.  I've tried searching the state constitution concerning how legislative officers are chosen, but couldn't find anything on the president pro temp aside.  If someone else could find the senate rules on this, that would be great.  The other officers are kind of obvious in that their caucus picks them, but I'm still unsure of how the president pro temp is chosen. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  President Pro Tempore
Talk:List of Michigan companies

message: Please SPX service Solutions and Tech Team Global respectively subsidiary of SPX corporation headquarterred in Charlotte, NC and Global headquarters in Southfield MI
132.223.172.135 (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This page (should, I'm going to clean up in one moment) contain only companies that have their own wikipedia page; that is--it's not for every company based in Michigan, just those notable enough to have their own wikipedia page. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The criteria for inclusion should be notability, not existence of an article.  Existence of an article establishes notability, but the lack of an article does not necessarily refute notability.  Notability can also be verified with references to suitable sources.  That is, a company is notable if an article could be written in the future. SpinningSpark 18:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 132.223.172.135, 29 July 2011 

message: 208.90.199.30 (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to be added to the list there would need to be an existing article on Wikipedia for it. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 22:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed address/phone number. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 22:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 9 November 2011 

message: add Henry Ford Hospital, Health Alliance Plan
Drgrenan (talk) 05:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done - see List of Michigan companies#H. →Στc. 07:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 2 December 2011 

message: *Happy's Pizza
MJD is bomb (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: , unless notability can be demonstrated and an article created--Jac16888 Talk 15:34, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: H

message: ACO Hardware
76.112.215.33 (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please also note that companies added this list should have their own, separate Wikipedia article that is linked to here. With that in mind, companies have to satisfy the notability criteria at WP:CORP to be considered for inclusion in Wikipedia in any capacity. elektrikSHOOS (talk) 01:57, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 16 May 2012 

message: Please change the link from AT&T to AT&T for simplifying disambiguation, per Talk:AT&T#Incoming links to AT&T. 12.153.112.21 (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  AT&T Inc redirects to AT&T, so there is no reason to change the link.  The talk page you link to says much the same thing.  Please stop making these requests until you get consenus on this change.  RudolfRed (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2012
Talk:Christopher Amott

message: I think this page should be at Christopher Amott unless this is really the way he spells his first name. My Arch Enemy records seem to feature him with the ph, though. Aarnepolkusin 15:07, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; if that's the name he goes by that's what people will recognise him as. 13-days 13:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Skeletor2112 11:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Southern Michigan

message: The county map needs to be updated to include the entire state. If the subject of the article is "Lower Michigan" only, then that needs to be noted in the article title, and the page should link to the corresponding page for the UP's regions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.109.220.247 (talk) 14:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the Upper Peninsula? 

message: Having grown up in Ithaca, Michigan, and attended college at Michigan State University, I'm wondering about this inclusion of the Lansing area in "southern" Michigan.  In my mind, Lansing is much more in central Michigan, with the dividing line being crossed somewhere between Lansing and Jackson.
Emerymat 00:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not so sure about Southern Michigan going so far north 

message: Well, this should help sove our problems. With Southern Michigan being a subregion of Central Michigan, they will both have seprate identies, and seprate pages, but they will both be in the same region of Michigan. I did the same thing to the Thumb and Flint/Tri-Cities. Please help me on adding more to Southern and Central Michigan. Cgord (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The map that you added on June 11, 2008 (replacing the previous map) seems confusing.  The article title is Southern Michigan, but the new map does not show any region labelled as such.  Perhaps the previous map is better suited to illustrate the article? --Thomprod (talk) 16:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think the current map does not illustrate what portion of the state is included as being part of "Southern Michigan".  Some region of the map should actually be labelled "Southern Michigan". --Thomprod (talk) 01:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern Michigan a subregion of Central Michigan

message: I lived in Kalamazoo most of my life.  I never (repeat NEVER) heard anyone refer to the Kalamazoo area as anything other than West Michigan.  Evidence?  WWMT, the Kalamazoo based TV station chose their call letters (when they changed from WKZO) to reference "West Michigan Television.  The Nielsen rating area is Kalamazoo/Battle Creek/Grand Rapids.  The Kalamazoo County Convention and Visitors Authority belongs to the West Michigan Tourism Association.  I could go on, but you get the point.  Since there are no references to this article, I would propose that the counties west of old US-27 be merged into West Michigan where they belong. After all it isn't the Southern Michigan University Broncos! Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also seen Lansing and environs usually considered to be its own region, too.  The most usual split I have seen is Metro Detroit and Metro Lansing as their own areas;  Everything north of M-46 (Sometimes US 10) as Northern Michigan, and old US 27 splitting east and west south of there.  Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalamazoo in Southern Michigan?
Talk:Gilby Clarke

message: Quote from article: "Overall in his role in Guns N' Roses, Clarke was never featured on any of the bands official studio material, but was featured during half of all 192 shows played during the Use Your Illusion world tour and most of their music videos."
- This makes no sense. He appeared on the Spaghetti Incident, did he not? The article says so just a few sentences earlier. This entire entry reads like it was written by a 12 year old.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.100.189.26 (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected, indeed it seem pretty silly considering that 3 of his releases with Guns N' Roses are listed in his discography. Cleaned up some of the page, will work on the rest, especially the solo years, later. HrZ (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

text: I think he did, will need to look up more sources but im pretty sure he posted it on his twitter? Although im not sure how serious it was, not sure if it should be added or not though HrZ (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Not sure if what we think of him makes any difference. I am only here because we were born on the same day, SqueakBox 16:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Doomwatch

message: I got most of the original list from tvheaven (including 3:13 and lost items) and corrected the capitalization.
I got the dates for episodes 1 from the TVheaven images of Radio Times, and the rest from http://epguides.com/Doomwatch/.
From http://epguides.com/Doomwatch/ I also capitalised My and added elipses in By the Pricking of My Thumbs.
Can anyone confirm that no episode was transmitted on 8 August 1972?  And preferably the reason. Rich Farmbrough 15:33, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode lists

message: I've removed the description of Doomwatch being "a Quango, a government organisation...". The whole point of a quaNGo is that it's Non-Governmental. Les woodland (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quango
Talk:Plain

message: "A plain is a landform formed by the deposition of alluvial soil over a long period of time by a river coming from the mountains."
Isn't that just the definition of an alluvial plain, which is something different?
Billy Shears 20:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  I have changed "a plain" to "an alluvial plain", though I don't know if it needs to be removed altogether.  Joe D (t) 21:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alluvial

message: whether it makes sense to merge all these small  plain articles into one. `'mikka 19:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: I removed the list. There is :Category:Plains, which works fine. The following articles are red:
* Alexis Leigh Plain, USA
* Australian Plains
* Pianura Padana, Italy
`'mikka 19:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing plains

message: i wanted to add a sentence to mention that plains generally as bounded by a geological and physical feature sucha as mountain a set of hills or a body of water. What are there people's thoughts on this idea?  Chrisfromcanberra (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  All plains have a defined boundary? 

message: this is all so freakin' wrong!!!!!! have any a y'all been in 8th grade? what idiots
The first sentence reads
'relatively high relief, as well as flat'
Isn't this a contradition? low relief means flat. High relief means the opposite.  Chrisfromcanberra (talk)
I changed the wording to
'with relatively low relief, that is flat or gently rolling'
BrasilianEngineer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasilian Engineer (talk • contribs) 00:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradition in terms 

message: I came to this article to understand what is and isn't a "plain," and ended up more confused.
Can they have trees?: I added "[primarily] treeless" to the article description and first sentence, because that's in the definitions of dictionary.com and Merriam-Webster. 
Is "plain" a landform or biome? There's an overall confusion in this article: does "plain" describe a landform, or a category of biomes, or both? The flatness suggests landform, the treelessness suggests biome category. (I am quite sure that referring to a flat, forested expanse as a "plain" is would be nonstandard.) The sentence "In a few instances, deserts and rainforests can also be plains" is 'very' confused on whether we're talking about a a biome or landform. I changed it to "In a few instances, deserts and rainforests may also be considered plains." (I haven't checked the source, so I'm trusting it does support that.) Even with this "may also be considered" phrasing, it's unclear: is the idea that a desert biome can cover a plain landform? 
Grammar and style: I removed a lot of strange "would be"s, and "on the doorsteps of mountains" - but further cleanup is needed to meet Wikipedia's style guidelines. SSSheridan (talk) 12:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Lam Tin station

message: Lam Tin might not mean blue field. HenryLi 16:05, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think it can mean, then? (Note the wording on the article: "literally", not "meaning") Deryck C. 16:25, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  station name 

message: Lam Tin station is high above the ground, not on the ground level. This can be seen from the western train entrance towards the station - trains went in through a bridge. --Deryck C. 16:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevated
Talk:Howie Seago

message: By the contributions of this article's author, including keep votes to the AfDs of David Seago and Laura Seago, I suspect this was written by Howie Seago himself or a relative of his. I am interested to know what the relationship between the three is. — JIP | Talk 16:20, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The prose says Seago was born in Texas. The infobox says he was born in Washington state. Only one can be correct. Anyone have a good source to decide between the two? Gentgeen (talk) 09:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace?