lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Farrah Fawcett

message: Farrah's gravesite photograph is grossly overexposed. Photographers need to learn how to use the exposure compensation feature on their camera. If somebody lives in the Los Angeles area, please take and upload a better photograph into the article. If would do this myself, but I live more than 2,000 miles away from California.  Anthony22 (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on "Death" could use a better gravesite photograph 

message: Farrah made an appearance (cameo with lines) on either the pilot of Fall Guy or the first episode, as herself interacting with Colt (Lee Majors).  I just don't have the info to cite the appearance, but it is not in her list of television credits in the article. Nutster (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is trivial and non-notable. We don't need to mention everything someone does.  - FlightTime (open channel) 16:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  108.16.207.46 (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

text: So it's your belief that her list of TV appearances should be incomplete? 2600:8800:218F:2D00:D0E4:52D7:DEB2:D4C4 (talk) 04:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fall Guy 

message: There is a reference that is render as html in the middle of the page. 204.48.94.5 (talk) 04:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem
Talk:Vasily Degtyaryov

message: More correct pronunciation is Degtyaryov (or Degtaryov). Pibwl 19:03, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: See Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian. --Alexander Iwaschkin 20:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes, the page should be renamed to ''Vasily Degtyaryov''
Talk:Tītokowaru's War

message: Im not sure if the last line is quite phrased in encylopaedia like language, but since it amused me greatly i have left it in (nowhere does it say wikipedia has to be boring).-Isthatyou
I've changed "of Te Manu" to "o Te Manu" which is the correct spelling of the place. 87.74.29.231 22:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Beinart

message: I'm against deletion, as I've said on the project page, and thanks to CinnamonA12 the article was for a time of a reasonable size. But now the "Works and views" section is swelling again to what I think are unsustainable proportions. Unless Beinart can be prevailed on to cut it down to a more appropriate size I'm going to go in and slash it.Sartoresartus (talk) 08:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dangerous bulge

message: The article had the book coming out on June 1. Today, May 31, I purchased a copy at a regular old bookstore. I put up a crude placeholder until a more accurate date can be displayed. --BDD 22:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.  Amazon has it coming out tomorrow (june 1).  Oh well.  It will all be moot tomorrow anyway. - Jersyko·talk 22:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: Has What's Your Problem been canceled? They were weekly until they did the one about Obama, and suddenly stopped running it. The last episode wasn't even the last in the series they filmed that day-- the third simply wasn't shown and I haven't heard anything about it. Wellspring (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's your problem?

message: Since this is a largely self-written entry, can you please show some sense of proportion? Cut this down to more appropriate size given a realistic assessment of the subject's notability, take out the excessively hyperlinked waffle that can't possibly be of interest to readers other than the subject himself, and slash the number of links at the bottom to the absolute minimum. This is an encyclopedia, not a self-promotion contest. If I do it it's likely to be done quite insensitively, so you might want to do it yourself. Thanks.Sartoresartus (talk) 04:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Show some sense of proportion

message: Thank you. Crisp and to the point. Wish more editors had such good sense.Sartoresartus (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent condensed version

message: Could the user that put this tag please explain why you believe this page was created for pay? I see the tag referenced november 2020 - was there an investigation of some sort that I might have missed? BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with ) 06:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted it. I wrote parts of the section about Beinart's works and views and I certainly didn't get paid for it. ImTheIP (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag 

message: Recently a self-published blog has been used as a source on this article. Please see Wikipedia's policy here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources . Dhawk790 (talk) 12:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-published blog
Talk:USS Virginia (SSN-774)

message: "On 10 and 11 March, the prospective submarine shot 12 dummy torpedoes into the Thames River, Connecticut, from each of the boat's four tubes. "
I'm not even sure what this means. March of what year? Why is is a "prospective submarine"? From the context I think it means that after the boat was launched in 2003, they did some weapons tests with it in March, launching some practice torpedoes in the Thames, before it was delivered to the Navy and commissioned as an actual warship, hence "prospective submarine".
And does it really mean to say that they launched FORTY EIGHT dummy torpedoes? That seems kind of unlikely. I'm thinking it's a lot more likely that they launched a TOTAL of 12 dummy torpedoes, using each of the four tubes, so three each. In any case such an event would be a pretty minor part of the test program, since as far as I know the torpedo tubes are the same old technology that we've been using right along. They didn't need to be specially proven. I should think that they did a lot more work testing the conformal sonar arrays, photonics mast, propulsion system, digital boat controls, and all the other untried technology. The torpedo tubes are like the one part of the ship that they could be sure were going to work. 
Idumea47b (talk) 23:44, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:University of California, San Diego

message: — Assignment last updated by A2prieto (talk) 04:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis - Summer Session22

message: With regards to the edit made by @ElKevbo, I note that University of California, Los Angeles does mention its ranking as a public university. WP:BOOSTER suggests replacing "…is widely acknowledged as the preeminent university by most university rankings" with "…is ranked A by X, B by Y, and C by Z", so I am unsure why the same couldn't be done here.
One point of contention is the removal of the amount of applications received—I am unsure why @GuardianH did this as it being the second most applied to university in the United States is a noteworthy fact, and is similarly mentioned in the opening of University of California, Los Angeles. This is not WP:UNDUE.Blimpherd (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like WP:BOOSTER is outdated and out of sync with WP:HIGHEREDREP; we should update it to avoid this (understandable) confusion. ElKevbo (talk) 11:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Per WP:DUE, information in the lede should be summaries of the content in the body. The application fact wasn't even in the body, so it didn't make sense to put it prominently in the lede. GuardianH (talk) 14:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings in lede 

message: I just reverted this edit on 6 April 2024 which was clearly wrong. The edit summary was: "The conclusion that the Regents diligently named campuses with a comma is not fully supported by the citation."
No, the conclusion is fully supported.  The cited source is an official letter written by former UCSD chancellor Richard C. Atkinson in his capacity at the time as the President of the University of California to all chancellors to reiterate that the proper usage includes a comma.  At the end, he then specified the "official campus names" along with the dates of their Regental approval.  All nine campus names included a comma. 
Anyone familiar with UC history would know that the comma was specifically adopted as a symbol of the campuses' independence, especially the independence of Los Angeles from Berkeley.  Clark Kerr went out of his way to praise the Davis campus in his memoirs for not having "hang-ups" with Berkeley like Los Angeles. Coolcaesar (talk) 23:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The official name is the University of California, San Diego
Talk:Red Lake, Minnesota

message: Is the town name "Red Lake" (two words) or "Redlake" one word?  I ask as my Rand McNally atlas shows it as one word and everyone else shows it as two.  PedanticallySpeaking 17:47, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
It is Red Lake. Two words.
History
I don't see any history of the town under section "history". Just a description of the shooting  —Preceding unsigned comment added by M4390116 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

message: This entire article needs to be rewritten.  I have neither time nor in depth knowledge of Red Lake to do this myself, so it would be greatly appreciated if someone would do this as soon as possible.  Thank you! 71.37.251.184 (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite 

message: Was there an inspiration of Vice City. Or was that just a Jack Thompson hoax? Jerry Steinfield (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 shooting
Talk:Whistleblowing

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 14:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whistleblower →  – It's the encyclopedic, expected title. Also harmonizes with :Category:Whistleblowing –St.nerol (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

text: The move has been discussed briefly before. The only objection to moving back then was that the article first should be rephrased to use the verb "Whistleblowing" more than the noun "Whistleblower". Currently, this article naturally switches between those terms and I don't see why this is any sort of problem. I took the liberty to rephrase the first sentence. –St.nerol (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 September 2023 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dmath1117 (talk) 23:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This former German has gained the impression that there is no whistle blowing in Germany. People will vote with their feet rather than exposing themselves to revenge. But full names are never quoted in the media anyway, so it will always look odd. The Leuna/Minol/elf Aquitaine land swindle, the 'cum-ex' and the wirecard scandals did not come out through whistle blowing. The culture would also be to rather demand some 'pocket money' than exposing a fraudster. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:590A:309F:284E:E752 (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BIOL4410 senior seminar

message: It looks like the article has been thoroughly linked & Wikified, so it looks like it's time to remove that tag from the article. Some sections may need cleanup, but they all look well linked now. Cocoaguy (talk) 22:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to remove the Link tag?
Talk:Violin Concerto No. 1 (Prokofiev)

message: Grammatical point from awhile back: changing 'was premiered' to  'premiered' makes sense only if the rest of the sentence is balanced to reflect the changed: Original sentence — It was premiered on October 18, 1923 at the Paris Opera by Marcel Darrieux with the Paris Opera Orchestra under Serge Koussevitzky.
New sentence after the change - It premiered on October 18, 1923 at the Paris Opera by Marcel Darrieux with the Paris Opera Orchestra under Serge Koussevitzky ... something's missing, e.g. 'by' and 'and' (instead of under) or something else.  Made a stopgap change but it could be made more flowing. Schissel : bowl listen 18:15, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
:Now, a paragraph starts, 'The failure of the Paris premiere...', but there is no previous reference to or detail on this failure. Martin Hogbin (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll look into that now. Alfietucker (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is better now.  Is there anything that can be added to say what is meant by 'failure'? Martin Hogbin (talk) 17:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I addressed that even as you were writing your comment. :-) Alfietucker (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Daihatsu Sirion

message: Sirion is still on sale in Turkey, the UK and Greece in same name: Sirion.
*Apologies for the confusion, when I wrote about the name Daihatsu Boon I only meant that it was released under the name Boon and Passo in Japan, not in Europe and Australia. I have tried to reword that part to make it clearer. -- Lochaber 09:25, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kōsaku Yosida

message: I entitled this page 'Yosida' because
* this seems the spelling preferred by the person himself (see google search for his full name) and on most japanese web pages.
* this is the spelling used on the title page of his famous textbook.
I am aware that today's preferred transcription of the japanese word would rather be "Yoshida", so I put cross references where I could. MFH 18:37, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yosida vs Yoshida 

message: I just came across "Operational Calculus: a theory of Hyperfunctions" and thought of adding in his list of work but i'm not sure it's by the same author, though I'll be surprise there could be two K Yosida in functional analysisNoix07 (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In the preface of the Russian translation "Операционное исчисление: Теория гиперфункций" it is mentioned that the author is famous for his book "Функциональный анализ" (1969) (=Functional analysis) and that he is a foreign member of Russian Academy of Sciences, so yes, they are the same. Danneks (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: other book
Talk:Mahler's theorem

message: "It is a fact of algebra that if f is a polynomial function with coefficients in any specified field, the same identity holds."
Did you mean to say "in any field of characteristic 0"?  For characteristic p>0, I'm not sure what the formula would mean.
Crust 18:40, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: The article needs a link to the article that defines p-adic continuity. I presume is the standard cylinder set/ p-adic's as a metric space topology, but being precise would be nice. linas 00:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  continuous with respect to which topology? 

message: the comparison with the situation for real numbers is a bit weird to me, since the theorem talks about continuous functions on the p-adic integers, not the p-adic numbers which would be in closer analogy to the reals. but I'm no expert :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.183.186.185 (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  why compare w. the real numbers? 

message: So you can use merely continuous functions over the p-adic numbers but requires derivatives over the reals. What does that mean?
Crasshopper (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation 

message: The article at states that f being a polynomial can't be weakened down to continuity, but remarkably it can. Finite difference states, "In analysis with p-adic numbers, Mahler's theorem states that the assumption that f is a polynomial function can be weakened all the way to the assumption that f is merely continuous." The statement that it can't needs to be qualified, so that it shows what the barrier to weakening was, and of course for the development of the article, how it's circumvented. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 06:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-contradictory on continuity
Talk:Convergent boundary

message: This article highly lacks the citations and notes required for a well developed Wikipedia page. There is only one work cited and it appears to be from The University of Leeds, School of Earth Science website. Even with this source present the article can still come across as unreliable and as the source is only used for a particular section of the Article it doesn't make a great impact on the quality overall. However, the information that is presented is done so in an unbiased and neutral way. There are no claims that appear heavily biased towards one particular position or opinion.Ailobao (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article requires more references and citions in every paragraph. However, I believe that texts are pretty relevent to the topic. It hepls with beginners who are lack of knowledge about convergent margin.
Chenhy12 (talk) 06:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation 

message: I agree with Chenhy12, while this article has useful knowledge for beginners, it needs more sources of information, and more citations in every paragraph. There is interesting stuff in the Volcanic Arcs, Back Arc Basins, and Oceanic Trenches sections, but there are no citations in any of them to support that information. Images of the various processes discussed would also be useful. ErraticGeologist (talk) 15:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation 

message: The article generally requires more information supported with more resources. While it has covered a good range of sub-topics, more elaboration and information is needed for each sub-topic. Could consider incorporating some of the sub-topics like volcanic arc and oceanic trenches into a bigger topic of "topographic features along subduction zones". This could help improve the organization of subtopics. Also, while the diagram used in the article is useful to explain different types of convergence boundary, having some description clarifying the ideas would help! -- Bing Y. Lee (talk) 07:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Hyrule Castle

message: Hyrule Castle being a location from the Zelda series of games, it is featured in many of them and they are predominantly cited on this page. For this reason, wouldn't it be reasonable to group the Zelda games under their own section and the other games in which Hyrule Castle is featured under another appropriately named section?
Grumpy Troll 29 June 2005 19:49 (UTC)
:Considering that, at the present, there are only two games listed which aren't in the Zelda canon (Super Smash Bros. and Soul Calibur II), I don't think it's really necessary. Jeff Silvers 19:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Zelda'' series section
Talk:List of Munros in Scotland by Section

message: Do you like them (in Section 4)?  Some of the other longer sections could do with them.  If you object please say so here.  Thanks Thruston 14:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... I can see the argument, but IMO the Munro's Tables sections are enough. They have the advantage of being verifiable and universally recognised divisions, whereas any further subdivisions must be subjective. Section 4 does have some fairly clear and distinct regions (Nevis Range/Mamores/Grey Corries at least), but other regions might be harder to subdivide. I reckon too many sections would clutter up the article and the table of contents as well. The maps probably provide enough of a visual aid as to how the hills divide up into areas. --Blisco 17:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They also help to disambiguate hills with the same name in each section (for example in Sec 4 the two Stobs Ban and the two Aonachs Beag).  But I agree that we don't want to clutter the thing up, nor are they appropriate in all sections. Thruston 12:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsections? 

message: According to the Munro Society, a new survey of Beinn a’Chlaidheimh measures it at 2,998.5ft — 6.7ft shorter than expected and 1.5ft below the required height for a Munro. However, any re-classification decision rests with the Scottish Mountaineering Club. --Mais oui! (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beinn a’Chlaidheimh 

message: A new Munro article has been created called List of Munro mountains in Scotland, which is an October 2018 download of the Database of British and Irish Hills ("DoBIH").  Use the data on this new article for any updates to measurements in this article, as some of the measurements have changed slightly. Britishfinance (talk) 19:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 2018 data for Munros
Talk:Computer art scene

message: Actually -there were plotters before even the crt became popular. A plotter could be programmed via teletype. Check out the British Computer Art Society -which was formed in the 1960's but has recently been reconstituted <http://www.computer-arts-society.org/>. Trevor Batten <www.tebatt.net>
Trevor:Joan G. Stark wrote a good article about the History of Text Art. HTML Version: http://www.acid.org/info/mirror/jgs/history.html  and Text Version: http://www.geocities.com/joan_stark/textasciihistory.txt
See also ASCII art --Roy-SAC 06:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: British Computer Art Society

message: Apple II/Atari 800/Commodore 64 computers practically gave birth to downloadable art (and demos) using their 16 color modes.  They were displaying colorful graphics while IBM PCs were still only monochrome.  -----  In 1985, Amigas were displaying 640x480x4096 color photorealistic images, while IBM was stuck at only 16 (ega).  It's a serious oversight to ignore everything that existed prior to the VGA.  -  Theaveng 21:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you do appear to be well versed on the subject (by the way the article did not ignore pre-vga ANSI and ASCII IBM textmode graphics) so please contribute your knowledge of the c64 + apple scene to the article. --Sodium N4 21:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is there no discussion of Apple, Atari, Commodore or Amiga art?
Talk:Fitting subgroup

message: :In mathematics, the Fitting subgroup F of a finite group G, named after ABCDEF Fitting , is the maximal proper normal nilpotent subgroup of G.
The phrase beginning with "named after" should be added, with the correct value of ABCDEF.  Not only is there the danger (humorous though it may seem, nonetheless real on Wikipedia) that someone will think it's a subgroup used in order to fit something, and change the F to lower-case (I haven't actually looked at Killing form but I'll do that next!), but also I know a math professor at MIT who said that on one occasion he was "outraged" that the eponym of a certain mathematical concept was not thus identified in its Wikipedia article (he logged in, using his real name, and I think that may be his only edit) (is this present sentence long enough?). Michael Hardy 19:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've taken care of the above.  Now the non-existent article Hans Fitting needs to get written. Michael Hardy 23:50, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)