Talk:Wittenberg

message: Here link about the Wittenberg project of the LC-MS and the Independent Evangelical-Lutheran Church Germany: 
http://www.selk.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=179&Itemid=99  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.226.249.204 (talk) 10:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I want to go the stadium! Who would have known that, right in the middle of Wittenberg, was the Joseph-Goebbels-Stadium?
What a tremendous blunder.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjjjc (talk • contribs) 13:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not true. It is not in the article. --FeralOink (talk) 23:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Article.. 

message: I may have made a mistake. I removed Reinsdorf from the list of added places here, in the Wittenberg article. I did that because it was red lined, and when I searched on WP, I found Reinsdorf listed in a different district than Wittenberg, see Reinsdorf,_Saxony as of June 2012.
Just to be certain, to double check, I searched on Google, to confirm. I found this Maplandia entry for Sachsen-Anhalt, Wittenberg Reinsdorf. So I am uncertain if I did the right thing or not.
 --FeralOink (talk) 23:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted my prior edit. --FeralOink (talk) 23:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinsdorf 

message: Was Wittenberg actually part of the original Duchy of Saxony?  Looking at the maps it looks like it was east of the original stem duchy and that the lands around Wittenberg were simply acquired by the Ascanians who merged it with the Saxon territory they received when Saxony was partitioned (similar to how the Wettins merged Messien with Electoral Saxony).  Emperor001 (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Duchy of Saxony

message: Site of an incident described by H. DE VERE STACPOOLE:
Wittenberg
THE “Black Hole of Calcutta” and the “Well of Cawnpore,” those dark spots on the history of India, stand out in their blackness against fairly light surroundings. Wittenberg, as dark in its way as either, scarcely stands out in the History of Brutality which is the history of the German conduct of the great war.
The terrible thing about Germany is the fact that she seems to have taken out letters patent for vileness; that vileness has become her right and prerogative, and that the neutral nations have accepted the fact as a natural one.
A very mean man, once he gets a reputation for meanness, can commit mean acts without raising much adverse comment.
In the same way Germany, by a system of uniform brutality, can commit “Wittenbergs” without creating any great excitement in the minds of neutral onlookers.
If England were to starve her German prisoners and set dogs on them and thrash them, and force them to labor after the fashion of Germany, the howl of outraged neutrals would be heard through the two Americas and the Scandinavias.
Germany does these things and worse, and there is no excitement over the business. It is the German method.
But, thank God, the future of humanity is not in the hands of the neutrals, and the men whose part it will be to punish crimes will remember Wittenberg. If not, Louis Raemaekers will remind them.
And this:
https://wartimememoriesproject.com/greatwar/pow/powcamp.php?pid=17934 [h[Special:Contributions/81.142.24.131|81.142.24.131]] (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: First World War