lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Isakhel

message: Recently there has been a flood unsourced,self glorifying edits that do not follow wiki guidelines at all on this page,The edits are about how the khan's of isakhel were Nawab's while in reality that never was or is the case'Nor was this title ever bestowed or used by the khans,Second are the exorbiant claims of land that they owned'Which are false in their historical sense as sargodha was the home of the tiwanas of kallra state who under Malik Fateh Khan Tiwana held sway from lakki marwat to sargodha'Same is the claim of the khan's having land in Rahimyar khan'Which was historically the part of Bhawalpur state and when it was merged with Pakistan,The three main districts formed were Bhawalpur,Bhawalnagar and (Rahimyar Khan) and so many other lies,obviously the person is a relative of the khans,And is laying false claims on this page so please the adminstrators take note,And if more such unsourced&Biased posts are made please block them as this is against wikipedia policy.thankyouu.amvgajupjntqaktrjadmqj Yoohooyoo (talk) 15:25, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sockpuppeteering and fradulent claims
Talk:Investor education

message: The websites I've included tags to on this page are investor education sites from government agencies. I hope to include others as I edit the page. I am willing to take them down, but I feel it's the same as an organization linking to its own page. 
The BCSC, for example, links to its corporate site on Wikipedia. InvestRight is the commission's investor education site. 
Please let me know what to do.
Bcscce
I updated the page with more information and outside links in March 2008, but still haven't received word whether or not the banner will come down. 
Bcscce  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcscce (talk • contribs) 23:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of Catholic dioceses in Scotland

message: Nominate for deletion. Not necessary anymore. Benkenobi18 (talk) 00:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If we are doing double cats, then yes we need this again. All the diocese categories have lists associated with them, Scotland should too.  Benkenobi18 (talk) 00:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Transport geography

message: The following appeared as the last sentence in the above section: “Also water transportation is based upon early constructioning from railroad.”  I found the sentence unclear and suspect most readers would.  The key, most likely, is a definition of constructioning.   Our local library queried an on-line source with over one hundred general and technical dictionaries, and came up empty-handed on the existence of such a word.  For me, it boiled down to this: the article would suffer less without the sentence than with it, so I deleted the sentence.  Pendright (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transportation modes:  

message: I've added rail transportation as another mode of transportation, there needs to be sources cited for the others. There are also more forms of transportation relating to transportation geography than automobile, train and water.Mcpherko (talk) 01:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modes of transportation 

message: Both categories seemed to be lacking citation so I added a short amount of information that I found and then gave both citations.DustinD (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road Transportation/Maritime Transportation
Talk:Nebuchadnezzar IV

message: I think this article is possibly confusing this person with Nebuchadnezzar III. PatGallacher (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you may be right. Richard75 (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same person as Nebuchadnezzar III?
Talk:Year One (film)

message: why isn't this it's own page? --67.85.139.96 (talk) 01:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the notability guidelines for films says that stand-alone articles about films are not appropriate until shooting commences.  This is because many factors can interfere with a film before it enters production -- budget issues, scripting issues, casting issues, etc.  If you can, writing about the project's development at a source material's article.  For example, Spider-Man 4 redirects to Spider-Man film series, and the announced projects of Neil Marshall are under his article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 03:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Own page

message: Is this film's title "Year One" and "The Year One"? IMDb keeps changing between the two. I changed this article's title from "Year One (film)" to "The Year One" but maybe it should be changed back. Djbj16 (talk)
: I believe the title should be "The Year One"- I was hired as an extra for the filming in New Mexico, and every instance of the name I've seen so far has had a "The" in front of it. --Linktoreality (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Correction- I've seen one instance otherwise, on the back of the chairs of the director and other big wigs. Linktoreality (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

text: The Year One?  It doesn't sound right.  I mean, come on.  When you put "The" in front, it makes Year One altogether a noun.  And Year One just sounds better ... in my opinion.  --Hqwerthqwert (talk)  03:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year One or The Year One?

message: I've reverted an edit made by Sony Entertainments Ltd. (Special:Contributions/208.84.225.10) to this page. Smartse (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI editing 

message: An anonymous changed my up to date edit on the box office stats to re-introduce its opening weekend ranking. That's ok if the community deems it important information, but the reference it uses to cite its opening week standing cannot validate this info. This reference changes week to week. I would like feedback on whether this info should be included and, if so, to find a reference that we can cite that will validate this info.Bobinit (talk) 19:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Office Section Questions
Talk:Rational consequence relation

message: It seems to me that rule RMO \frac{p \vdash r \quad\quad p \not\vdash \lnot q}{p \land q \vdash r} is a generalization of rule CMO \frac{p \vdash r \quad\quad p \vdash q}{p \land q \vdash r}.
For, if p \vdash q holds, then, assuming consistency, p \not\vdash \lnot q also holds.
Therefore, I wonder why both rules are required. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RMO generalizes CMO ?
Talk:U.S. Army universal camouflage trials

message: "U.S. Army trial patterns" is not descriptive enough. What was the official title of the trials program? When did it take place and what was its objective? There have been lots of army trials over the entire history of the U.S. Army - which one is this article referring to? If it was a trial for a new uniform, or simply a new camouflage pattern, then this needs to be clarified at the outset. Dom Damian (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. Army trial patterns of what?

message: This article seems to have a major inaccuracy. MultiCam was not one of the trial patterns. Crye had developed the original "Scorpion" pattern with Natick and submitted that for the trial, and when it wasn't selected (as is already covered), they modified it slightly to create the MultiCam that they released to the civilian market. The original Scorpion and MultiCam are very similar, and pretty much compatible, but they are not exactly the same, and this article shouldn't claim it was MultiCam. Especially since Scorpion W2, another slightly altered version of the original pattern, has been adopted as an Army-wide replacement for UCP; W2 was developed by Natick using their rights to the original pattern, just as Crye's MultiCam made changes to the pattern to secure exclusive rights to that exact pattern. See the Scorpion W2 article for sources. either way, this article needs adjusting. I'll try later. oknazevad (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MultiCam 
Talk:R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant

message: The pronunciation was listed as gin-AY, which I took to mean gi-NAY. Is this accurate? kwami (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm changing it to GIN-ay, but still wonder if it shouldn't be GIN-uh. kwami (talk) 01:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation
Talk:Terry Teene

message: I know Terry......we belong to the same magic club in Tyler, Texas. I'll put up some photos of him soon.Buddpaul (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Terry

message: Terry Teene and George Voorhees created and originated the character, name, and original costume and facial makeup of Ronald McDonald
76.91.14.191 (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is already in the article. What are you proposing? -- Fyrefly  (talk) 20:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronald McDonald
Talk:Under the Gun (band)

message: Under the Gun is probably the coolest band out there, and is awesome.
* There is another band by the name of Under The Gun, found on Myspace. I saw them live in the early 90s and they still rock today, mainly in Europe. As far as I'm concerned, this article should be about them since they existed much longer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.182.99 (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:KTUX

message: When exactly did the station adopt this branding (and, for that matter, when the current branding debuted)? There's almost nothing currently in the article to indicate even an estimate, other than it was after the 1993 format change… --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebranding to "Rock 99" 

message: This radio station is NOT licensed out of Carthage... it's licensed out of Shreveport. whoever wrote this article is dumb.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.168.52 (talk) 13:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carthage?!
Talk:Aviation combat element

message: Rationale for the creation of this article can be found here. bahamut0013♠♣ 01:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation
Talk:Orlando paladino

message: "Caronte (Charon), ferryman to the underworld	bass	Leopold Dichtler
[...]
Licone, a shepherd	tenor	Leopold Dichtler"''
How can the same singer have sung a bass part and a tenor part ?
That must have been a tremendously long, long voice ... A real phenomenon.
Dichtler has always been known as second tenor in the Esterhaz troupe, and as a violinist once his singer's career was over.
--Alf.68 12:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gosh ! What a voice !
Talk:Setanta Records

message: I don't see how the label can "re-emerge" unless it was previously defunct, which the article doesn't state. Also, if valid, chronologically that statement should go at the end.
It does say it "stalled', but that is POV I'd say. A label doesn't stall just because it failed to sign a hit act. 
The Chalets have had recent international success while on the label.Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-emergence
Talk:Erich von Götha

message: CorenSearchBot deemed this page a copy of http://www.artandpopularculture.com/Erich_Von_Gotha, however, it appears from the link, that this is the other way around. Deleting the tag 82.231.41.7 (talk) 01:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How in the world could that be?  The history there says that one started 22 April 2007.  This one was created 7½ months later, 5 December 2007.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 02:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1. Why is "de la Rosière" in the title? The only references with that in his name seemed to be clones of a Wikipedia page. All his books seem to just use "Erich von Götha". Is there a way to change the title of the article?
2. The statement "His most famous work is The Troubles of Janice" is opinion.
3. The link to the "Erich von Götha official site" appears to be dead.
4. There is a much better article over at the German Wikipedia site: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_von_G%C3%B6tha
If my German skills were better, I'd translate it and replace what is here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.88.168.34 (talk) 18:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  better article at German Wikipedia
Talk:Five Elders

message: NEED A PAGE ON LAU GAR  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.152.189 (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

message: This page seems to be about 3 separate groups that are loosely connected - shouldn't this be broken up into 3 separate pages?  They are clearly 3 separate groups. 24.175.174.14 (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 Elders 
Talk:Lyric soprano

message: "Lyric sopranos have a range from approximately middle C (C4) to "high D" (D6)"
Should this be read as:
"Lyric sopranos typically need a range covering approximately middle C (C4) to "high D" (D6)", or
"Lyric sopranos typically happen to have a range covering approximately middle C (C4) to "high D" (D6)"Yeatesi (talk) 19:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification could be useful 

message: Is there any main source for classifying soprano roles in 20th and 21st century opera? It would be great to expand listed roles to include more contemporary ones.SpiritedMichelle (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern roles 
Talk:Fut Gar

message: "Fut Ga Keun or Buddhist Fist Style is a Northern Shaolin style of Kung Fu ..........."
In the most cases Fut Ga(r) was describe as an Southern Shaolin Kung Fu Style! e.g. http://www.southern5.com/Fut.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.246.195.18 (talk) 11:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
File talk:Reinhardt Heydrich speech excerpt.ogg

message: Who is the copyright holder of the whole speech?
Couldn't it be released into to public domain right now?
Would anyone sue for the copyright claims of Reinhard Heydrich?
Isn't this a part of some booty Nazi audiomaterial confiscated
by the Allies during WW2 and now laying in some National Archive?
thanks.--84.163.122.230 (talk) 02:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Centre of Tallahassee

message: This has the feel of corporate propaganda 
"the Centre of Tallahassee followed up on this success by booking "
Any page talking about success without footnotes looks like the corporation that owns this place is editing this page.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.6.243.152 (talk) 01:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertizin 
Talk:Remco

message: It seems that a doll manufatured by Remco in or around 1973 was over looked in it's list of toys. It was called the "Mimi Doll" and stood around 19" tall with long blond hair. She came with 8 tiny records that, when inserted in a door in her back, made her appear to sing "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing" in 8 different languages. I was given this doll as an x-mas gift by my grandmother and I played with it constantly. Unfortunately I was only 3 at the time and those little discs got lost or ruined quickly and Mimi's inner record player broke very quickly. I have been looking for another one to give as a gift to my mother who would absolutely flip out with joy if I could find it. I have found a couple here & there, none of them working and usually with no more than 1 record, if any. I hope to find one that works and has the records before x-mas this year!99.51.52.242 (talk) 11:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgotten toy made by Remco 

message: Not one mention of those terrific science kits from the 1960's?  I loved those kits!  Every now and then, my father would bring me a new one--and I'd tinker with it for hours!
I actually came here to check if they came from Remco, or might they have been Mattel or Hasbro.  I've found out elsewhere that they ARE Remco; you can still find things on line--and apparently even buy them.
They came in cylindrical cardboard containers with metal ends.  There was a main series of them in one size, and several more ambitious projects in a larger size.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Those terrific science kits??  Not mentioned???
Talk:Micrelenchus rufozonus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Garfield Park (Indianapolis)

message: The content of this article seems to include information about Garfield Park in general mixed in with the specifics of the Conservatory and Sunken Gardens. It seems to me that it would be better to rename it to something like Garfield Park (Indianapolis), and reorganize the article to give history and data about the park in general with a subsection about the Conservatory and Gardens. Indyguy (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 
Talk:Sam Stone (song)

message: Also referred to in the lyrics of "Cop Shoot Cop".Pustelnik (talk) 12:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to the Time magazine article is broken; the page does not exist. I marked it as a dead link, but does anyone know what it is supposed to link to? Vichordius (talk) 00:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time magazine link 
Talk:Betony

message: I'm moving the following text: "Betony plays a charactor in Elizabeth Kay's outstanding trilogy, The Divide." from Stachys officinalis to here (until we can figure out where, if anywhere, this should go).  A google search seems to show that betony the plant is most common, but it is not unknown as a name (see  for presence in a name list, or  for an example of someone named Betony). Perhaps Betony should be a disambiguation page?  Or perhaps that should be Betony (disambiguation)? Kingdon (talk) 02:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the novels are notable, but just so. the individual characters, unless written about by third parties, are not notable in themselves. this can stay here for historical purposes, but i dont see the need for a disambig page.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Betony as a name and a plant
Talk:Orange Herald

message: it was a British weapon. But where was it tested? Australia? Hugo999 (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Grapple series at Malden Island and Christmas Island. 17387349L8764 (talk) 21:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tested where?
Talk:Dakota (fossil)

message: I disagree with the proposed merge, at least to Edmontosaurus. If anything, it should merge with Trachodon mummy to a broader "mummy dinosaur" page. It would be a more natural choice given the amount of detail involved, as opposed to adding paragraphs on a single specimen into the genus article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J. Spencer (talk • contribs) 
:Makes sense to me. Anyone opposed to merging this article into Trachodon mummy? Firsfron of Ronchester 02:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we at least change the name to Hadrosaur mummies or something? We could also merge in Leonardo, and nayways, the generic assignment of Dakota is pretty ripe for controversy once a re-assessment of Maastrictian "edmontosaurs" comes out, not to mention shifts in personal genericometers. MMartyniuk (talk) 03:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course - it would be "Hadrosaur mummies" or "Dinosaur mummies" or something like that; the former's a bit more accurate as only hadrosaurs have been found as "mummies", the latter gives room to grow.  Interestingly, we don't have an article on Leonardo (not that I'm asking for one to be started). J. Spencer (talk) 02:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there is Bakker's Triceratops mummy... MMartyniuk (talk) 02:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Cobb Island (Maryland)

message: Cobb Island is considered the scene of the first successful radio transmission of speech on December 23, 1900.  This fact should be included in the article.  Cobb Island is included (complete with a photo) on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald_Fessenden#Weather_Bureau_contract_and_the_first_audio_radio_transmission page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.121.14.11 (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, thanks! Kumba42 (talk) 08:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Radio Broadcast 
Talk:Darlington, Maryland

message: This is an article about a village dominated by a historic district, yet there is nothing in the article about the history of the place?  Am I missing something? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Dorsey, Maryland

message: Dorsey actually straddles the Howard County and Anne Arundel County line and spills into both, not just Howard. The county line at that point is the Baltimore and Ohio railroad bridge right by the original Dorsey station. The Dorsey owned estates covered a good chunk of what is now Anne Arundel County and parts of where Elkridge and Columbia are now. Would love to work some more on this article but finding sources is pretty hard. I grew up in Dorsey and know some of it but cant find much specific for it online. Wolfstorm000 (talk) 20:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 
Talk:Oxon Hill, Maryland

message: Was not Senator Wayne Morse a prominent resident of Oxon Hill?  Or did he just keep horses there?  This is a memory from the sixties.  Cliff O'Hearne  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.205.16.42 (talk) 19:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps not - googling on "senator wayne morse" and "maryland" finds a comment related to Poolesville, MD , which seems more likely Tedickey (talk) 19:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

message: The given source doesn't mention Salubria, etc.  It only discusses plans. TEDickey (talk) 11:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  outlet shops at Salubria 