lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Melody Oliveria

message: OK, I'm attempting a clean up and re-org of this article (God what a nightmare). I can't believe this article has been here a year, and this is the condition it's in. So, for admins looking to delete, please discuss first. x 15:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't as bad as I thought, just used the Delete key a lot. There's some more refs that need to be found, any help is appreciated of course (You Tube vids are not a source). I'm also going to add an image or two.x 15:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Quite annoying typo...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.138.188.164 (talk) 14:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what you're referring to. If you see a typo, why not fix it?x 16:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psuedonym 

message: For the article text about her moving to LiveVideo, I tracked down the video where she states this, and am using it as a reference. At this point there is no clear WP policy about using YouTube as a source, and it seems to be up in the air right now which way to go: Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources#YouTube_as_a_source x 22:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Live Video citation using YouTube as source

message: I'm not familiar with the cite system of referencing so I don't want to change this myself, but the first link takes you to a headline content page.  The direct link is http://www.news.com/YouTube-directors-ready-for-postproduction/2100-1025_3-6110776.html?tag=item  Does somebody who knows what they're doing want to change this?  B1atv 16:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: first source

message: AND She hasn't used that "Headless Chicken" Blog since 2011 so that's now gone, too:)  This FRED story is also ancient history now, too, and you may even delete THIS entry prior to the year 2020, also.  Thank-You! Lesbrown99 (talk) 03:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIG STORY!!!  She Created **** Character!!! 
Talk:Westford Knight

message: Is it possible to get better pictures? I can't see a "sword" or a "shield" in either of these two images. The "detail" photo just looks like a rock. Am I missing something?
:The hilt of the "sword" points NE and the blade points SW on the image. The length of the image follows the fissures in the rock. It is a bit easier to see if you turn tilt your head 45 degrees to the right. I can't see a shiled though. The first thing that jumps to my mind is that the hilt of the sword looks way too big and the blade too short. In my book: a cute story but a hoax. Valentinian (talk) 12:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Henry Sinclair travelled to America in 1398? Where's the evidence? What about the Orkney Manorial Records, don't they place him in Scotland during this period of time? And Henry Sinclair's descendants in America, what do they know about this fantastic piece of earth-shattering history?
Brian Smith, Earl Henry Sinclair's fictitious trip to America
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/ahamilton/sinclair.htm
First published in New Orkney Antiquarian Journal, vol. 2, 2002 Wfgh66 (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Sinclair never travelled to America 

message: @doug weller, why would the addition of the contemporary statue be WP:UNDUE? It is backed up by a source and is relevant to the article. It is a contemporary statue made by the people who maintain the carving as what they believe the carving depicts. Scu ba (talk) 12:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Scu ba I've brought this up at the WP:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Westford Knight - was this edit Undue?. I suggested editors might want to respond here. I hadn't realised until I read the source that Scott Wolter was involved and that the sculptor was working with him. This Hooked X stuff is nonsense. Doug Weller talk 15:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not mentioning the hooked X or walker, just that there is a statue at the site and the organization that put it there. Scu ba (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the new statue WP:UNDUE
Talk:Aragonese Crusade

message: Charles of Valois, the French claimant to the Aragonese throne was the son of Philip III of France, not his brother. Also the Charles of Anjou who had engineered the accession of Pope Martin IV was Charles I of Sicily, the uncle of Philip III and the great-uncle of Charles of Valois. I've commented out rather than removing the references to the accession of Martin IV as Charles of Sicily's support of Martin was indeed one of the factors in the offer of the crown of Aragon to Charles of Valois - but by a rather longer chain of causes than the article was implying.
PWilkinson 19:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankyou. Might as well delete the information since a previous editor apparently just confused the two Charles (as did I in editing his edit). Srnec 02:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my error. The Valois claims and the papal-Valois connection need to be expanded, more correctly than I'm able to do, in order to clarify the politics underlying the Aragonese Crusade, as a clearer guide to readers like me. --11:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have started a new article on the War of the Sicilian Vespers: it's a stub at the moment, but hopefully can be expanded to explain the connections between the Aragonese Crusade and the closely related conflicts in Italy during the same period. PWilkinson 19:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity correction
Talk:Operation Osprey

message: I cleaned up the text a bit to make it a bit more readable, such as adding a space between a word and a  following hyphen and putting a space between "ill" and "health."  For the sentence, "Unfortunately, the unit and plan was not put to the test in Ireland because the feared American invasion of Éire territory did not occur," I took out the "unfortunately" so it doesn't appear that the article would've supported an invasion of Eire.
RaptorEmperor 16:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits
Talk:Grand & Toy

message: In 2013 OfficeMax merged with Office Depot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.101.117.205 (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with Office Depot
Talk:Stanley Road (10th Anniversary Edition)

message: Right now the article reads like someone copied and pasted a press release from the record company when the album was released.  Anybody else agree?  --fuzzy510 22:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected. --kingboyk 13:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality dispute
Talk:Naval Architect

message: To my mind a merge will 1)loose the role of naval architects in terms of their functions among the engineering and education requirements of naval architecture,  and more importantly 2) not provide a clear jump off point to biographies and history of important naval architects and companies. 
There are many entries for persons such as Farr, Frers etc , who are yacht designers but the category needs to bu linked up to /yacht designers/naval architects/ etc. Sic Transit 14:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge no 

message: For the education, in Australia, we do study marine engineering (propulsion) subjects, but not as dual degree.
Antonyk 04:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree Merge No
Talk:The Goa Mix

message: It would nice to have an actual track listing after the main article here, probably in addition to the track summaries already there. DJ Phaz3r 22:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added Tracklist -hsd --82.37.224.143 00:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tracklisting

message: Groundbreaking? This is a bit opinion-like and POV. Just see Paul's other Mix CD articales. --213.83.125.225 (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Dimethylformamide

message: From a 1988 Report on OSHA
Health Hazard Information Bulletin: Dimethylformamide and Testicular Cancer
http://www.osha-slc.gov/dts/hib/hib_data/hib19880217.html
19:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: is this the 'nitrogen' in shell's nitrogen enhanced gasoline? --Jaded-view (talk) 01:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  nitrogen rich gasoline 

message: It appears that most of the external links have expired. -- Bob Collowân (talk) 09:30, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links expired 

message: I would strongly recommend adding in the section “structure of DMF” the actual information about its crystal structure according to the information published here .  I already tried to add this info however it was rejected by the Wiki editors which, imho, is a huge loss for the portal. The inside into the crystal structure of the compound provides invaluable information about the most stable molecular conformation and the intramolecular interactions responsible for the properties it exhibits despite it being defined at high-pressure or at low-temperature conditions. 213.55.224.161 (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMF structure
Talk:Catopsis berteroniana

message: This article has an intro saying that the plant is thought to be carnivorous, but the evidence is mixed. Then there is an entire section explaining how carnivory works, with no mention of the controversy.
How is this possible? 2601:647:5E80:4F30:2DCD:BCE4:F2FA:5E13 (talk) 19:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the bodies of the drowned organisms are broken down by bacteria, fungi, etc. and not by any kind of digestive enzyme produced by the plant. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thought to be carnivorous?
Talk:Masterpoints

message: The last paragraph about skill/experience can be cleaned up.24.13.86.24 22:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: This article reads as though the ACBL is the only bridge organization
awarding masterpoints.  I know that that's quite wrong, but as I've
only played in the ACBL myself I don't know how wrong, so I'm not
the right person to fix it.  Probably there should be (1) a lead-in section
introducing the concept, (2) a section describing the way points are used
(as well as limited and stratified games, it should mention bracketed
ones and those with a minimum point requirement); then (3) a series of
sections for each bridge organization that issues them.  The details of
pigmented points in the ACBL belong in its section, for example.
Are there any bridge organizations where masterpoints don't accumulate
indefinitely?  I don't know that either, but if so, it needs to be covered.
66.96.28.244 09:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The EBU masterpoints accumulate but expire if you allow your membership to lapseTetron76 (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too ACBL-specific 

message: I was wondering whether Victor Mollo's monster point idea was too playful to add a section to the article.Tetron76 (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Monster points

message: There are a couple of inaccuracies in the requirements for ACBL titles.  First, the colored point (silver, red, gold, platinum) requirements for the higher ranks (Silver Life Master and higher) do not apply at all to anyone who was already a Life Master by January 1, 1989, and their effect is delayed for anyone who was a Life Master by December 31, 2011.  Second, the requirements for the higher ranks also include the requirements for Life Master status.  In other words, collecting 1000 points which include 200 silver points will not make you a Silver Life Master because you will not have satisfied the red/gold/platinum requirement for Life Master status.
In addition, I believe it remains the case that anyone who collected any red points before the creation of gold points (I think January 1, 1974) can achieve Life Master status without needing to satisfy the gold point requirement.  True, there probably aren't many remaining non-Life Masters who fall within that category, but I think it's still on the books, and in any event should probably be noted as a matter of historical interest.
98.112.117.8 (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some inaccuracies in the ACBL titles
Talk:List of institutions named after Thomas Aquinas

message: Just for clarification - this page was started because part of the original list was actually in the introduction on Aquinas's main page, but it got too big to be listed there.  It's been interesting to see this list grow!  FranksValli 23:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Does this article need to be modified to fit Wikipedia's article layout expectations? David aukerman 17:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: article status

message: * Please make sure that future additions to this article are formatted and wikified so that the article maintains its consistency. David aukerman 17:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In particular, if you add a school to this list, please place it in correct alphabetical order.David aukerman talk 19:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: future additions
Talk:David Carpenter (historian)

message: I think this person's birth date needs to be checked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.40.54 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1990 is obviously incorrect and I have removed it. From a quick google search I couldn't find a source for his birthdate, the article's category says 1947 but I would like a source if anyone can find one.--Commander Keane 23:10, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Minority Party (Denmark)

message: Minoritetspartiet is formally still excisting, ok. But go check their website. Upcoming events August 2005.Medico80 23:04, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, now they are officially no longer a "political party", says their website. However, they continue their fight by other, nonpolitical activities. So what to do with this article...? Medico80 09:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tw options: delete or rewrite. since it is clearly not at political party, running fo election rewrite so to keep the basic information like Jacob Hauggard´s Union of Conscientiously Work-Shy Elements or delete it. I would say delete, then recreate the article if they do a come back to politics Angelbo 11:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup or delete
Wikipedia talk:Bad category names

message: It seems like all the rest of the entries on this page are false positives, so I'm going to mark it as inactive, and move it off the main list of projects. Feel free to update it and move it back. JesseW, the juggling janitor 02:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems done. 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out!
Talk:Mudflat hiking

message: This article contains little or no original material and was almost wholly adapted from the Dutch article on the same subject.  It is a lot shorter than the original, and left out a lot.  Bigturtle 23:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New article

message: Germans call this "Wattwandern". --217.110.154.54 14:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wadlopen" 

message: The West Frisian word is Waadrinnen. See: :fy:Waadrinnen Wadlopen is the Dutch word. And Vadevandring is the Danish word. (I didn't actually know that last one. I just clicked the Dansk link on the side. Gheheh.) Winter (User:Snakesteuben) (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waadrinnen 

message: "Mudflat hikers are only allowed out into the Wadden Sea under the supervision of licensed guides"
This is not true concerning Germany and Denmark (own experiance) and I doubt it for the Netherlands, although it may be recommended and - for persons unfamiliar with mudflats - quite reasonable. Is there any source for this information?
217.5.198.115 (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, some changes to the article are in order Bigturtle (talk) 00:31, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restrictions
Talk:Yeading F.C.

message: I removed the section about the Yeading vs Newcastle tie being historic because it was the first time two teams six levels apart had played each other. This is certainly not true. To give one example, in January 1992, Lincoln United, then playing in the Central Midlands League Supreme Division faced Huddersfield Town in the first round, losing 7-0. [] The gap between the teams at the time would have been as below
Division 3 (Huddersfield Town)
Division 4
Football Conference
Northern Premier League Premier Division
Northern Premier League Division One
Northern Counties East League Premier Division
Northern Counties East League Division One
Central Midlands League Supreme Division (Lincoln United)
Making 7 levels apart. Valenciano 23:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Not sure there's much point in having a separate article for the stadium just yet..can always be split off if/when there's enough verifiable info. Paulbrock 14:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge stadium article

message: I think it would be a good idea. Merge this page with the club page like the club and Hayes F.C. have merged in 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CherriesMad12 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge The Warren (Yeading F.C.) into Yeading F.C.
Talk:Initial algebra

message: The intro is WAY TOO HARD to understand. Can someone correct that? --M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical tag

message: What is 1 + \{\aleph_\omega, 42\} ?
:Someone was having trouble with this on Talk:F-algebra too. I haven't studied category theory properly so don't take my word for it, but I'm guessing that + is the disjoint union. So to answer your question:
:1 + \{\aleph_\omega, 42\} = \{(1,0), (\aleph_\omega,1), (42,1)\}
:... or something like that. GilesEdkins 00:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  endofunctor sending X to 1+X - huh? 

message: Help, please, let there be a rewrite!  I know a little category theory, which I was hoping I might be able to build up to by just starting with initial algebras.  Let's have an article for beginners!  (Or at least a section for beginners.) Norman Ramsey (talk) 14:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way too hard indeed 

message: I've recently updated this article, but, judging by the discussion above, I see it should be updated more.
Since it's not year 2005 now, and almost everybody is familiar with categories, I'm curious if 1+(\_) is still a problem for many. Etc. I can expand ad libitum, but is in still necessary?
Vlad Patryshev (talk) 16:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent updates 

message: This term (used here with respect to the Ackermann function) is not defined anywhere, and unfamiliar to me. Can anybody explain it? (Otherwise, I think it should be removed). AmirOnWiki (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "strong" functions?
Template talk:The Simpsons

message: Apparently, there is some disagreement over the linking of the WikiBooks version of each article in the Navbox (especially when there is a WikiBooks link in the Toolbox on the left side of every page. See discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia-Books#Question.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 15:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiBooks in Nav 

message: --ToonsFan (talk) 11:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My vision of a new version of the template 

message: I come with this proposal to split the Characters section into a separate template, having already 33 articles and lists. Something similar was done with the :Template:Simpsons games, with just 22 articles (plus links to the main article, the franchise article and the category). This is mainly to comply with Wikipedia:NAVBOX. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 19:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal
Talk:Daisuke Asakura

message: Can someome please rewrite this entire article? Right now, it sucks. No really. It sucks. I almost died laughing after reading through it. "...because electronic pianos are related to plumbing." Bwahahaha! What the crap...? 70.121.163.99 02:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lmao-- this is funny but to be honest i dont think anyone researching mr asakura actually cares about the authors sense of humour i dont think anything should be changed. the bit about michihiro kuroda was very biased. LOL
I agree, if anyone can find some decent source information please refer to it in this discussion article, else this article is going to be deleted on the grounds of having no references. On the basis of this I have began an article re-write. --JinecouO.N.E 14:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite BADLY needed! 

message: こんにちは朝倉大輔さん、私の名前は Vika です。私は 13 歳です。あなたをとても愛しています。あなたは今まで聞いた中で最高のミュージシャンです. もちろん、私は外国人ですが、あなたのことを知っていて、あなたのようになりたいと思っています、あなたのおかげで、私はあなたのようになりたいです、あなたと同じ指輪とネックレスを身に着け、あなたと同じ服を着て、あなたのように髪を整えたいです！ 私はあなたのようなシンセサイザーとピアノを持っています🎹あなたは私が今まで見た中で最も甘くて親切なミュージシャンだと思います。これを読んでいただければ幸いです  さようなら、朝倉大須香さん… 217.66.158.127 (talk) 18:13, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  シンセサイザー Yamaha montage 8
Talk:Walkerville, Ontario

message: calling the suburban sprawl "nondescript" and "unsustainable" isn't neutral.  I agree, but it's my opinion, and it's not a neutral one.
: I agree too.  Adjectives removed.  PKT 17:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Aminoglutethimide

message: Cytadren should be redirected here. Steroid Expert 23:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Anterior corticospinal tract

message: My three neuroanatomy texts/atlases (Haines, Netter, Kiernan) all use anterior/ventral corticospinal tract instead of direct pyramidal tract, and Google returns only 93 results for "direct pyramidal tract". The anterior cerebrospinal fasciculus appears to be a remnant from Gray's; it too fares poorly on Google. I propose a move to ventral corticospinal tract. Likewise, our article on the crossed tract should reside at lateral corticospinal tract. Thoughts before I make the switch? --David Iberri (talk) 23:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm the original author, and I have no objection to a move. However, the Terminologia anatomica (per Dorlands) is "t. corticospinalis anterior", so "anterior corticospinal tract" might be better (Google yields a near tie, with 309 for "anterior corticospinal tract" and 308 for "ventral corticospinal tract").  --Arcadian 00:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point -- I'm moving it to anterior corticospinal tract now. --David Iberri (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: This is currently given as reference 1 on this page, and it is giving me a 404. Berthold, Daniel Goude, C.-H. "Pyramidbanans främre okorsade del - Tractus cortico-spinalis anterior - Människans nervsystem: Uppslagsverk". nervsystemet.se. 71.62.135.172 (talk) 02:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference gives a 404?
Talk:X-chair

message: The article concerning "X-chair" refers to "Savonarola or Dante chair". I understand that the chair generally known as "Dante chair" or "Dantesca chair" was named after the person called "Dante". I would like to know who exactly is meant by this term "Dante".  There appear to be several candidates for it.  One of them is Dante Aligheiri (1265 - 1321) who is said to be the author of La Divina Commedia. If the disignation "Dante chair" comes from a person who lived in the Renaissance period, say, 16th century, Dante Aligheiri does not appear to be that person.  It would be highly appreciated if a right answer could be given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.214.22.72 (talk) 01:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)