Talk:Mount Saint Charles Academy

message: :Image:Mount Saint Charles Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This image is clearly in violation of copyright and will be removed unless copyright and rights of usage are proven within one week. Mwahcysl (talk) 19:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mount Saint Charles Logo.gif

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mount Saint Charles Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616135733/http://cis.neasc.org/cis_directory_of_schools to http://cis.neasc.org/cis_directory_of_schools
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Hello! In the article, there is currently this sentence:
"Tenreiro was recently named National Principal of the Year for his role in transforming Cumberland High School into one of the most successful high schools in the state."
I'm a bit concerned about the use of "recently" and the lack of sourcing, however, I was able to find something on it here: NASSP's 2016 National Principal of the Year. This article came up on my new to Wikipedia copyediting introduction, and I'm not too sure how to add it to the article. Is there a way to make this sentence sound less promotional and more encyclopediac? Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 01:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced sentence about Alan Tenreiro 

message: There is a comment in the Athletics section’s ice hocky program that a citation is needed for the claim that the school’s ice hocky program “…is considered to be one of the best in the United States.”  In searching for a source for the claim I discovered the website MYHockeyrankings.com which uses data from Gamesheeting.com and it appears to be an authoritative source.  Mount Saint Charles Academy is ranked 520 of 2,138 teams, the top 24%. That does not seem to warrant a “one of the best in the United States” claim but in any case it should be more specific.  I suggest rewriting the sentence to be specific including a citation for the source of the data.  For example, “The school is perhaps best known for its ice hockey program, which was in the top 24% of teams in the United States as ranked by MyHockeyRankings.” [include citation referencing the website mentioned above]. 
Wrigson (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds far less promotional (and definitely the best way to proceed while keeping the information regarding their ice hockey program in the article). I would double check with the [sources noticeboard] though, since I'm not sure if it's a really reliable source. Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 01:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, the correct way to wikilink is WP:RSN.  will WP:transclude the page. I got pinged here because of what appears to be a bug in the section watching tool I'm using. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 05:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Chess Yes, thank you! Figured something was wrong when the entire page popped up. Sorry about that! Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 05:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Since I'm here anyways, I think the most specific you could be would be focusing on the achievements of the team. So rather than saying it's one of the best hockey schools in the USA, a more neutral way of phrasing that would be to say the school has won 45 state championships in men's hockey. i.e. The current phrasing which I agree with. This makes it easier for a reader to understand why the team is or isn't considered good. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 05:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics section “ice hocky program” ranking claim