Talk:Australian permanent resident

message: The page seems to suggest some state still allow new permanent residents from commonwealth countries to vote. But from a quick look through of all the state electoral commisions, this isn't the case. Most follow the pre 1984 rule allowing those registered/enrolled before 1984 to vote. Queensland seems to have continued this to 1991 allow people registered/enrolled before 1991 to vote. None of them seem to allow residents who weren't registered/enrolled before those dates to vote. Nil Einne (talk) 09:40, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I noticed the same thing.  I just changed the wording on the main page to reflect that fact. 1.124.255.249 (talk) 04:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting 

message: The article states. "At present, there are two programs to grant permanent residency..." What about Family Migration? (I have just received permanent residency as the husband of an Australian citizen.) The link to the Australian government web site now leads to a "Forbidden page." Spathaky (talk) 10:26, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only two programs leading to permanent residency? 

message: The flag on this document is not the Australian flag. And the document is about Australia? A flag isn't relevant. But having the wrong one for a completely different country is a significant error.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.132.103 (talk) 03:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree does not appear to be relevant to the subject, removed. MilborneOne (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Cost of the permanent residency visa seems worthy of mention. From what I've noticed with other visa costs it is considerable therefore worthy of mention. As an extra comparisons to the US UK and Canada could have merit. It provides those seeking a permanent resident visa choice so they can make comparisons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.111.13.200 (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: other

message: This seems to imply that any person seeking asylum in Australia will automatically and unconditionally be granted permeant residency in Australia. Which is completely untrue in the sense; this is how it works. It is true someone who is successful in claiming asylum is granted permeant residency (I assume) but usually after a very prolonged process careful scrutiny to verify their status is justified and may even involve time spent in detention. Just thought this might be wise as we don't want to give the wrong idea.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.235.27 (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rephrase that all alsyum seekers and refugees will be granted Permeant residency. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Australian permanent resident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120106104507/http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/services/consular-services-charter.html to http://www.smartraveller.gov.au/services/consular-services-charter.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified