Talk:Gardermoen Line

message: Gardermobanen runs on a track which is not next to a platform at Kløfta, so Kløfta should maybe not be marked as a station on the track? Jerazol (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about that, but the maps I wound on the Norwegian Wikipedia showed that Kløfta was on Gardermobanen. So I really don't know. If you are confident in your assumptions, please go ahead and make the nessesary changes. If the trains can't stop at Kløfta (like it looks to seem on the pictures) then Kløfta is not on Gardermobanen in my opinion. Arsenikk (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kløfta 

message: There appears to be  a problem with route map, as the first two lines consist of the following symbols:
* |-
* | colspan="2" |
Pyrotec (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has changed a way back the code of the infobox so all routemaps in infoboxes are now showing this code (unless they have been manipulated). Arg. I'll look at it. Arsenikk (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route map 

message: My reference, which is in English and was published in 1996, which probably means it was written in 1994, says that it was intended that the Gardermobanen should attract at least half of the passengers to the airport. I can't read Norsk, so is that completely compatible with what is already in the article? That current statement is unreferenced, but I suspect that it has come form a Norwegian source.
This reference mentions a new link to the E6 and the Oslo Airport, Gardermoen#Ground transport provides more information about road transport. It looks like the railway has not met the at least 50 % target.Pyrotec (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not found anything contradictory to that statement in any sources—by since I was in primary school in 1994 I could not vouch for it either (based on my contemporary understanding of politics). What I am certain about, is that the purpose of building the line was to create it as the main mode of transport to the airport. The Norwegian source (ref 12) only states results for year 2006 and the current 34% market share. Arsenikk (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly that reference is bilingual. The English version is here:   Can I suggest that in cases such as this you call up both the English and the Norsk versions, that should get rid some of the GA reviewer's concerns about lack of English references.Pyrotec (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for digging around. I am sorry, but things are a little confusing here. The link over is the one provided in ref 3, while ref 12 is a press release that I cannot for the life of me find on the English section of the web site (I have tried to find it several times before too without luck). Arsenikk (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main transport to the airport 

message: Gardermoen Line should convert from 15 kV 16 2/3Hz AC to 3 kV DC.
121.102.47.215 (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is absolutely not planned. What you personally think should not be discussed here since this discussion should be about the article, not about the actual railway, according to Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. --BIL (talk) 17:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voltage convertion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gardermoen Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071113112314/http://www.hamar-dagblad.no:80/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071108/HDLEDER/711080035/1004 to http://www.hamar-dagblad.no/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071108/HDLEDER/711080035/1004
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Gardermoen Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071217092036/http://www.jernbaneverket.no/multimedia/archive/01720/Jernbanestatistikk_1720406a.pdf to http://www.jernbaneverket.no/multimedia/archive/01720/Jernbanestatistikk_1720406a.pdf
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5zPe3Dyqh?url=http://www.flytoget.no/eng/About-Flytoget/History to http://www.flytoget.no/eng/About-Flytoget/History
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/63dK13cve?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.regjeringen.no%2Fnb%2Fdep%2Fsd%2Fdok%2FNOUer%2F1999%2FNOU-1999-28%2F4%2F2%2F6.html%3Fid%3D355320 to http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/sd/dok/NOUer/1999/NOU-1999-28/4/2/6.html?id=355320
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612110033/http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/PDF/Rutetabeller/Norsk/2008/021-Oslo-Trondheimdovre-2008.pdf to http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/PDF/Rutetabeller/Norsk/2008/021-Oslo-Trondheimdovre-2008.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007104734/http://www.nsb.no:80/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/Bilder/Rutetabeller/450-Kongsberg-Eidsvoll-2008.pdf to http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/Bilder/Rutetabeller/450-Kongsberg-Eidsvoll-2008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Gardermoen Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.flytoget.no/eng/About-Flytoget/History
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/sd/dok/NOUer/1999/NOU-1999-28/4/2/6.html?id=355320
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hamar-dagblad.no/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20071108%2FHDLEDER%2F711080035%2F1004
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/Bilder/Rutetabeller/450-Kongsberg-Eidsvoll-2008.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612101454/http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/Bilder/Rutetabeller/440-Oslo-Jessheim-Eidsvoll-2008.pdf to http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/Bilder/Rutetabeller/440-Oslo-Jessheim-Eidsvoll-2008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified