Talk:South Korea–Taiwan relations

message: The title name is unbalanced because it should be either <Republic of China and Republic of Korea> or Taiwan and South Korea. --Appletrees (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You may want to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations, they're the experts here. I just put it at this name because the category itself is called :Category:Foreign relations of South Korea rather than Foreign relations of the Republic of Korea. If we want to change it, let's get a wider consensus and change everything at once. But the title definitely shouldn't include "Taiwan" --- the general consensus on editors is that "Taiwan" should be used only in the geographic sense, and "Republic of China" when we're talking about governments. cab (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't prefer the first one because it is confusing.(Mainland China also use "Republic") South Korea is generally called just as Taiwan. But you follow naming convention of International relation, please let me introduce to what I should read and where I can find the relevant article. --Appletrees (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the actual guideline. Ryan4314 (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the guideline they should be adjectives, and the shorter one should come first. Doesn't really help much here, because ROC can't be changed into a neutral adjective. How about <Republic of China - Republic of Korea relations> or <Sino-Korean (ROC-ROK) relations>? Andrew Yong (talk) 09:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: While I checking article history, I found that cleanup,copyediting, original research tags were removed without any discussion on January 27, 2012 and again on February 3, 2012. Whatever was the reason for the removal, It doesn't look like the issues have been solved.:
# Divide the article into a couple of subsections by period. (i.e. South Korean independence&Korean War, Cold War, Severing diplomatic ties in 1990s, and afterwards.) The lead section should provide an overview of the relationship.
# Some sentences are too long and hard to follow. (thus, copy-editing needed) Some sentences in parenthesis should be rewritten without parenthesis or included as a side note in the references part. 
# Spread the citations: out of nine citations, four are related to APEC meetings and two are Kim Yong-sam's visit to Taiwan. Including some of reliable sources from objective third parties (not just Taiwanese or Korean news) will improve overall quality.
--- PBJT (talk) 10:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed tag. 

message: Hi again. For Hangul please refer to first paragraph of http://www.tufs.ac.jp/ts/personal/choes/korean/middle/text/kairei2.html (in Hanja and Japanese translation), you will see that Hangul was created from the Chinese philosophy of Yin and yang. It is worthy to research more about this. That was a typo and Hanja is all from Chinese characters. (122.126.104.11 (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification. I cannot continue topic-unrelated discussion in this talk page, and please leave your comments on your talk page User talk:122.126.104.11. I'll be happy to discuss any topics on ROC-ROK relationship. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a forum: WP:FORUM. By the way, excellent job of singing your comment! --- PBJT (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hangul and Chinese characters 

message: I copy edited this article and also cleaned it up by adding section headings and reorganizing it a bit. Lexah06 (talk) 08:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Edit and Clean up 

message: Dubious timeframe for establishment of relations/Not a state then: The date given in April 1919 of establishment of relations between ROC and ROK is doubtful. ROK was annexed and under Japanese rule then and most likely has no sovereignty to establish relations with any other country. Anyone with citation to support the current statement, please add it in. Otherwise, the correct date would likely be after 1945 when Japan gave up its rule of Korea.Mistakefinder (talk) 04:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Belize–Republic of China relations which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress