Talk:Federation of Malaya

message: Used a template. Just to show the continuity of the Malaysian history before the formation of Malaysia. Need feedback and more info. Not that much is known about British Malaya. Thanks
--Bukhrin 16:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Noticed a change in the common name to Malaya. Yes indeed should be so. But the field common_name in the Infobox is to act as a pointer for the Flag of XXX and Coat of arms of XXX links beneath the respective flag and arms images. Placing Malaya would mean that it would attempt to generate a link to Flag of Malaya and Coat of arms of Malaya which are not created yet, and the template will be forced to just display Flag and Coat of arms. Anyway, the coat of arms of Malaya and Malaysia are basically the same and so are the flags and I do not see the necessity to create new articles dedicated to these two. Better still would be to expand this two articles instead.
--Bukhrin 14:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Malayan and Malaysian coats of arms are not "basically the same". The coat of arms currently shown is incorrect: the bottom row with the badges of Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore/the national flower should not be there. The four colours of the Federated Malay States should occupy the entire central space divided into quarters. The Malacca segment should show A Famosa, not the pokok Melaka. Also the star should only have 11 points. Andrew Yong 03:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeh, have to agree on that though, would be great if you can find and create an article about it, so later we can have the infobox points to the new one. Or just give me the image or something so I can look into it. --Bukhrin 04:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name in Infobox 

message: Do we have it? To come to think of it, I've never seen it before. __earth (Talk) 02:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The coat of arms had been changed numerous times and I think nobody is sure for how many times and what the changes were. Such as the variations of symbols of Sabah and Sarawak (was it Brooke's flag + kingfisher? hornbill + kingfisher? the current sabah symbol + hornbill? etc.), symbol for Pulau Pinang, Melaka and also the different guardian Tigers (the wussy old ones vs the current buffed up ones). Interesting to note about how the Coat of Arms of Malaysia looked like when Singapore was in. It was Singapore's civil ensign but replaced by the hibiscus (seemingly out of place when the shield represents the states of the federation) when they left 2 years after. You can see it here. Would be nice if they can represent the Federal Territory inside the shield, and my bet is they would have replaced the hibiscus with the Twin Towers. LOL  --Bukhrin 04:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but all that are Malaysia's, the federation of 14 (later 13) states. I am referring to Malaya, the federation of 11 states instead. Malayan's coat of arm shouldn't include insignias for Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore.  __earth (Talk) 11:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Wow. You are resourceful. Where did you get your information from? __earth (Talk) 04:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mostly books --Bukhrin 05:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which books? Maybe we should place them in the ref section? __earth (Talk) 05:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Good rendering of the coat of arms. However, the motto should be "UNITY IS STRENGTH برسكوتو برتمبه موتو " Andrew Yong 00:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Yeah, It seems I was mistaken, it's written in English, will try to alter the banner or somebody can just go ahead and do it.--218.111.18.186 13:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arm of Malaya

message: :Image:Coat of arms of the Federation of Malaya.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 13:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Coat of arms of the Federation of Malaya.png

message: There shoud be a section discussing criticism against the Federation including the People's Constitution Proposal, the nationwide hartal as well as the contribution of the leftist movement (sans communist). The way this article currently reads, it is not neutral per Wikipedia's NPOV principle. --Tikar aurum (talk) 11:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism against the Federation

message: The image :Image:Protest against Malayan Union.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Protest against Malayan Union.jpg

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmglee (talk • contribs) 18:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated from http://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persekutuan_Tanah_Melayu 

message: The figures for the ethnic composition of the Federal Legislative Council appear to be wrong somewhere; they add up to more than the total membership!  28 Malays + 14 Chinese + 6 Indians = 48 but 11 State and Settlement Members + 34 unofficial members = 45.  Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 10:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership of the Federal Legislative Council 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Federation of Malaya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Primary&PageNumber=72&NavFrom=2&parentActiveTextDocId=1118475&ActiveTextDocId=1118475&filesize=15776
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514204944/http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/21/36/00041791.pdf to http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/21/36/00041791.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Primary&PageNumber=72&NavFrom=2&parentActiveTextDocId=1118475&ActiveTextDocId=1118475&filesize=15776
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514204944/http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/21/36/00041791.pdf to http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/21/36/00041791.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hey, there appears to be some back-and-forth about the flag in the infobox. What are the points in favor of adding two flags? I really think that it adds way more problems than it solves. Sure there was a flag that was effective for 3 years, but a new one was adopted and remained the flag for the bulk of Malaya's history. If the old flag is notable, can't we mention it further down the page? TheSavageNorwegian 19:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag