lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sports Car Club of America

message: Sorry to interject here, but the main article is missing an area, Guam I'm not sure which region it falls under though, but we are one of the farthest areas away from mainland USA, GRSCCA website www.guamroadracers.com  --justin aka TechSalvager  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.151.82.48 (talk) 07:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regions 

message: The club racing program[1] is the road racing division - purpose built race cars racing wheel-to-wheel on either dedicated race tracks or on temporary street circuits. To compete you will need your regional racing license. Cars raced can be either modified production cars (ranging from nearly showroom cars with only additional safety equipment, to heavily modified cars that retain just the basic shape of the original vehicle) or designed-from-scratch "formula" cars.
Isn't that a contradiction?  Aren't lightly modified production cars the very opposite of "purpose-built?"
:Yes, fixed. Recury 16:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose-built? 

message: User:NawlinWiki added a merge tag to merge Oregon region solo2 into this article. He must have forgot to add the mergefrom tag to this article so I went ahead and did it. I would support merging info from that article to this one in order to avoid having stubby articles for each SCCA region. Recury 18:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request

message: Central division has been split in half, one part remains Central while the other half is now Great Lakes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.31.173.238 (talk) 01:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Division Update

message: Looking for members of Otto Cross racing team of the 70's
Bill Fisher is still active i believe.  Drove a 911 porche
We are Bill & Barbara Foster  Drove a gold colored AH Bug Sprite
bfoster1@ix.netcom.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.245.82.67 (talk) 15:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search for autocrossers of the past 

message: New interim president: Lisa Noble. 
75.137.24.56 (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  President
Talk:Incident On and Off a Mountain Road

message: According to the credits, Incident is based on a story by Joe R. Lansdale. Does anyone know if the story has the same or a different title? - CNichols 00:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The Plot could be expanded just a little bit and info on its production could be added as well (find on the DVD the making of feature)--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article:Incident On and Off a Mountain Road
Talk:H. P. Lovecraft's Dreams in the Witch-House

message: Instead of an immature thread of discussions on how crappy this adaptation was, could someone write in an OBJECTIVE section on the main page for what the differences from the original story were?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.83.70 (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences from the story?
Talk:Dance of the Dead (Masters of Horror)

message: We just watched this and my younger brother had a seizure because of the flashing lights and grotesque spinning scenes that could only make you puke. Somebody please write something about this fucking shit episode. 120.28.240.170 (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This episode makes people sick
Talk:Jenifer (Masters of Horror)

message: I expanded and removed the stub status. I also hunted down numerous review/fact citations and placed them where they were needed. As such I felt compelled to remove both the Stub and need for Citation marks. Any qualms, by all means put them back up, but please indicate why you think they are still needed.
--Bwross (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub and Citation Removal

message: At the end of the plot description it says 
"... she [i.e., Jenifer] lures him [the shop owner's son] into the woods and seduces him."
That's incorrect. Jenifer doesn't even try to seduce the boy; she just attacks him.
80.217.126.36 (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect detail
Talk:Skip Barber Racing School

message: I just made a ton of changes and removals. Because the article was obviously written as an advertisement, as some of it was written in the first person, I removed all statements of grandeur. I understand that this school may indeed be the greatest and the biggest and the best, but these statements need citations and references. When an article reads like an advertisement, it makes it impossible to look at it without being on guard and on the lookout for lies, and is unencyclopedic. For now, I left the facts. If a sentence contained obvious bias, I removed it. Beltz 06:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point Of View 

message: We need to remove the "citation needed" thing on here and revert the changes made above. It was all true if anyone knows Anthony and their family. Speaking as a friend, I can confirm he's a great guy who owns a great auto body shop right here on Long Island baby GO ISLANDERS  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.120.19.201 (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know Skip and Anthony in real life 

message: I removed all of the advertising content. If you have a problem, just be glad I didnt AfD it.-Kieran207 (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed advertising content
Talk:Deer Woman (Masters of Horror)

message: I removed some personal comments from an editor who is writing a detailed plot summary.  While we appreciate your efforts, this is an encylopedia and differs from IMDB a bit in the way articles are presented.  When covering episodic TV plots, it's best not to make them personal reviews full of opinions or to make any reference to yourself.  The current content of the article is inappropriate and should be rewritten in a more formal style.  Think of it as if you were writing for someone flipping through a set of neutral descriptions of the episodes - like an episode guide without your own opinions and you'll do just fine. Lisapollison 07:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep article free of personal comments

message: This page was recently blanked by an unrefistered user.  it is possible they were unaware of the effect their edit would have.  In the future, please typer your comments below ALL THE OTHER COMMENTS and then sign and date them with four ~'s.  That will preserve your comments as well as those that were made before you.  The Project tag above is an important sorting feature and should not be removed without a discussion and consensus reached.  Thank you Lisapollison 06:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Vandalism
Talk:Sick Girl (Masters of Horror)

message: The commentary says that Erin Brown has a blues band with her boyfriend (I can't remember the name) that contributed music to the soundtrack, but that they weren't able to put that and other bands in the credits for a reason I can't remember. I have't been able to find any information about this except for the director's commentary, and I think it should be mentioned in the article. Can anyone help? -- El Payaso Malo 16:47 March 26, 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.249.188.216 (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brown's Music 

message: The release date needs to be checked. According to Sounds Like the fourth episode was released after this one. Phatom87 19:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the reason different seasonsPhatom87 16:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check the relaese date 

message: We can hear a french-canadian song in the middle of this episode. Have got any idea of the name of the song?
Thanks.
All I can really say is the male singer says "L'amour" a couple times in the beginning, but then the rest is in French and is not included in the subtitles of the DVD. Neither is it included in the credits. It's a nice, bouncy, happy kind of song and I'd like to get my hands on it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.229.205.99 (talk) 04:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song title? 

message: I've trimmed the overlong plot summary by reverting it to a version from an earlier revision.  --Tony Sidaway 22:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Imprint (Masters of Horror)

message: There are a lot of reviews out there which should help make a solid "reception" section. These were on the article:
*Review for Imprint at Dread Central
*Nippon Cinema
*Twitch Films
There are also these:
*Horror.com
*IGN
*Icons of Fright
*Evil Dread
*Monsters and Critics
*CHUD
*DVD Talk
Obviously you don't need to use all of them but that is a good range that should let you touch on the various points. (Emperor (talk) 00:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I'm not sure all of them meet WP:RS, but will give them a going over and I'm sure there will be plenty to use. I'll also go through the official site to see if there is anymore info there on production. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: Just thought I would mention.  Having read in the article that this was streamed on netflix, I decided to watch it.  However the streamed film is a different movie with the same title directed by Michael Linn and starring  Tonantzin Carmello and Carla-Rae Holland.
The Imprint of this article is available from NetFlix through the mail.
Rantedia (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not on netflix streaming 

message: A Japanese story published in 1999 is "traditional"? Is this related to how Japan in the 16th century is "ancient Japan", even though they had guns and stuff?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.109.130 (talk) 22:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional 
Talk:Microspectrophotometry

message: "A common fallacy is assuming that the colors of objects we perceive are actually their colors, when in fact these are the colors that are not absorbed by the objects, but are instead reflected. A brown wooden desk is not brown, it is every color except for brown. Brown wavelengths are not absorbed by the brown desk, and are reflected back to our retina, fooling us into thinking the desk is brown when in fact it is a mixture of every other color but brown."
dont be stupid please. yours is the fallacy. why are you trying to redefine what the concept of color means? (and is this an article about color perception? where is the microspectrophotometry part?)
an object's color depends on how we perceive it, not on what range of colors it absorbs. a red apple is indeed "red" because we perceive it as red (because it reflects red light). thus, to extrapolate, please dont say that a piece of charcoal is in fact white because it absorbs almost all the light that falls on it. charcoal is black, in fact because it absorbs almost all the light that falls on it.
Simastrick 10:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Whoopee!

message: Article currently says, of the movie: "it had a ticket price of $5 when it opened."  That seems exceedingly unlikely to me, given that average ticket price in 1929 (http://www.pictureshowman.com/questionsandanswers4.cfm) was 35 cents.  Would this movie really have sold tickets at 14 times the average ticket price?  That's like a movie today selling tickets for $125.  Can someone verify or remove that line? --Elysdir 20:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ticket price? 

message: Why is there nothing about the show's plot and characters? There is no exclamation point in the show's title--only in the movie's; that is an error. The five dollar ticket price (mentioned directly above) is particularly dubious in that the standard top for a live Broadway show at that time was about $3.00. There is also a note on the George Olsen band being carried over from Broadway to Hollywood--but in fact virtually the entire stage cast filmed their roles. It's one of the movie's points of distinction. Further, Ruth Etting did not "star" in the show; she was its featured singer, no more. Someone with some genuine knowledge of Whoopee needs to correct and amplify. Fred Lane 03:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Show Itself
Talk:Hell-O

message: Trivia: When the song "Ollie North" is played backwards, the actual beginning of the song happens to be a slurred rendition of Careless Whisper.
I fixed up this album a little - there are two releases of it and one contains a 17th track, "Black and Huge". I also fixed up all of the track names, as they did not have the appropriate characters in them. If you would like to have a look for yourself, check out MusicBrainz. ~nitro glycerine
I think this page is kinda POV. It seems to imply that the quality of the songs, or the band's view of the songs, is somewhat low. But I've never heard Brockie or Derks speak ill of it, and they even played Dead Dog on the 2007 summer tour.
Oh, and America Must Be Destroyed was also released on vinyl. I've seen it on ebay before and even posted it on BC months back (Poor Ole Tom, BC) Oderus 04:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Irmo High School

message: Two most recent links are no longer functional...should be updated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.76.11.217 (talk) 05:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: <Copyvio redacted> by Meters (talk) 07:14, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: First, do not indent at the beginning of the paragraph and please fix above. Second sign your posts by typing four tiles at the end. Third, huh? John from Idegon (talk) 06:52, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irmo History
Talk:Clearwater

message: I think the Scientology information should remain. Their HQ is often referred to as simply "Clearwater", and those looking for Scientology information will probably go to the Clearwater page unsure which is the correct one. It doesn't do any harm. M.C. Brown Shoes 07:26, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

message: 1. Dear Daughter  2. Appears Hotter  3. Cheers Father  4. Smeared blotter  .5 Deer bought fur
6. Years thought her  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.89.219 (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WORDS THAT RHYME WITH 'CLEARWATER' ETC.
Talk:East Hampton Hospital Trust

message: I have removed this from :Category:Hospitals in London and :Category:Teaching hospitals because it is a fictional hospital. -- Jbattersby 18:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Just wondering who that ward was in relation to, as in the article it says that some of the wards in the hospital are named after people associated with the show. I can't think of any Marshall's in relation to GW at the moment, but if anyone knew, it'd be nice if it was incorporated into the article, as it just kinda hangs there with no kind of explanation. londonsista | Prod 01:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Marshall Ward"
Talk:Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation (National Treasure No. 78)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Pensive Bodhisattva (National Treasure No. 78) 01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 23, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-03-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Pensive Bodhisattva (National Treasure No. 78) 01.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hi Farang! I'm a bit suprised by your notability tag in the Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation (National Treasure No. 78) article. To be fair I'm not exactly sure what the standards for notability of an artwork in particular are exactly, but a quick look at, for example, [[Category:Renaissance paintings
|Renaissance paintings]] with hundreds of articles for individual paintings gives me an approximate idea.
The sculpture in question is clearly a major work of korean art, referenced alredy as highlights in two major museums in two different continents, and a third party cultural organization.
My main concern is not about this article, where it is easy to find several other sources for notability, but about other articles I've worked or plan to work with, where information is more scarce.
Thanks in advance for your input and comments!Myshkin. (talk) 07:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , the article's subject should be notable enough per  WP:N, that's all. I doubt whether the suspect has received enough coverage to merit its own article. Please note that i haven't  nominated the article for deletion,  but I'm starting a discussion that i believe to be relevant.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 10:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:SuperCamp

message: I attended SuperCamp in Singapore a few years ago, and it was FANTASTIC! I wasn't keen to go at first, but my parents insisted that I go. I expected it to be 10 days of dull academic sessions, but it was absolutely nothing like that. Within a few hours of the first day, I realised it was going to be one of the most fun and amazing experiences I'd ever had. Part of the camp was learning new academic skills. The academic sessions were fun and energetic, and nothing like anything I've ever experienced in school. I learned quick and easy memory techniques, speed reading, brain-friendly note-taking methods, good ways to plan and structure my time, information about my own personal learning style, and ways to write faster and more creatively. After camp, these skills helped me to cut my study time and raise my grades in school considerably. The camp also taught me very valuable life skills that helped me communicate better, think more creatively, solve problems, and set and achieve clear goals. One of the highlights of the camp was the Outdoor Adventure Day, when a professional ropes course company came in to help run a series of events. I learned that my mind has a lot of power and, individually or working in a team, I can achieve anything I focus on in the right way. Many of my closest friends today are people I met at the camp. I can truly say that SuperCamp was 10 of the best days of my life.
192.169.41.37 13 May 2006
SuperCamp is way cool. The 10 days I spent at the camp in Stanford last year were the best 10 days of my life - without a doubt. I'm planning to go again this year. Josh1988 18:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fidelity Magellan Fund

message: (Uniformity with other Fidelity Funds articles)
So I created a few articles for Fidelity Contrafund and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock. I also created Fidelity Magellan, but didn't realize this page already existed. Frankly, I agree with a lot of the comments below about neutrality and writing style. I am not sure that a lot of the content in the current page is worth keeping, outside the manager table. Therefore, I copied over the manager table, and will mark this page as suggested to merge into the "new" page. Community please feel free to correct/change course if you disagree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Data8504 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: "It has enough assets [more than $50 billion] to be the 75th richest country in the world." May 12, 2006. Shawnc 07:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assets

message: Just discoverd that the entire lead sction came from here http://www.answers.com/topic/magellan-fund and it is filled with incorrect and dated information.
Given that the lead section is incorrect, we updated it to reflect acurate information and will create hyperlinks from there. References used to build the piece are included now as well. 
Rather than leave information we know to be incorrect, we should begin with correct information and add hyperlinks to enhance the usefulness of the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.174.149.255 (talk) 11:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: You can already get a ten year history directly from Fidelity's website.  Although I do think it would be useful to give the entire history. 
Finance-writer 12:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Records of Assets Under Management and Performance
Talk:Electoral district of Maitland

message: WP:YEAR states, "Year ranges, like all ranges, are separated by an en dash, not a hyphen or slash:  is a two-year range, whereas  is a period of twelve months or less such as a sports season or a financial year. A closing CE or AD year is normally written with two digits () unless it is in a different century from that of the opening year ()." While it does go on to say the full closing year is acceptable, there's obviously a preference for two digit closing years. This edit that partially reverted this one, the edit summary for which explained the change to year ranges, was unnecessary. Wherever possible we should comply with the preferred method specified by the MOS and there's no reason that we can't here. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're misreading the guideline. It explicitly says that the full closing year is fine by the guidelines. Since this standard is used in literally thousands of politics articles, changing it on one page is hardly helpful. Furthermore closing with two digits works fine within text, but in tables it begins to look messy and asymmetrical. However, I think the discussion is probably one that needs to be had, so I'm moving this to WT:AUP to get a broader range of opinions. Frickeg (talk) 06:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Acceptable" does not mean "fine". It means it's OK but there is a better way. If a four digit year was "fine" then the wording would be something along the lines of "A closing CE or AD year is normally written either with two digits or as a full year." It isn't and clearly states a preference for a 2 digit closing year. Saying that it is "acceptable" is not giving a four digit year equal preference with a two digit year. It's saying that it's adequate, that it's OK to do so, but there is a preferred option. Arguing that other articles use four digit years is really in the realm of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. We should follow the preference stated by the MOS. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year ranges
Talk:Electoral district of Miranda

message: I've added a citation needed tag to the indirect quote of Antony Green. Green would be unlikely to say that a particular result "should" have occurred. Do you mean he predicted the opposite result? In any case, as this is an indirect quote of a respected source, a citation will be needed to clarify the meaning.
Ordinary Person (talk) 00:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ... it is referenced. Read the ref used in this article. From the ref... "Background: Created in 1971, Miranda is a natural Liberal electorate, being won by Labor only at landslide elections, two under Neville Wran in 1978 and 1981, and again under Bob Carr in 1999 and 2003. It should have been recovered by the Liberal Party in 2007 but was narrowly retained by Labor." Timeshift (talk) 00:17, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Pardon me. Sloppy wikipediaing on my part.Ordinary Person (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Green's comments

message: I feel like the WikiLinks for the years should be fixed-- I'm not sure they're all necessary and at first glance, it looks like it's linking to just the year and not the election of that year. I'd like other people's thoughts though. Queenofconfusion (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: They all link to election articles of that year, as far as I can tell. —twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 09:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiLinks for years
Talk:Isabelle Rees

message: I think Isabelle Rees is an important person in the Amiga Power fandom, but not of much importance outside it. Perhaps this should be merged to Amiga Power? JIP | Talk 08:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *nods*  Gets my vote.  --Stenun 04:29, 14 May 2006 (UTC)