lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Juke Joint Jezebel

message: Looking good! I moved the YOTP 12" to the end, I think it makes more sense to follow the CD, instead of breaking up the "flow" of the JJJ releases. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  My thinking with the 12" version was that it's really a variation on JJJ, whereas the The Year of the Pig Compilation is a different item entirely.  I thought having them together could be more confusing, since the seven track CD versino was included only with the Canadian CD, whereas the 12" was something you could purchase separately. 206.180.38.20 (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I broke the article into sections, but I'm not super happy with the layout yet.  I couldn't think of a good name for the section about all the different places the song has been used outside of the about, so I put licensing, but there may be something better.  I also want to flesh out the videos section, which is pitiful right now.  I may be able to dig up some info about how the song was made, because I remember reading an interview with Sascha a long time ago in which he said he'd already written the song and then Raymond just came up with the goofy chorus about sister salvation.  Anyone that wants to help is welcome. <B>—Torchiest</B> talk/contribs 02:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "Appearances"? Or "Also appears on"? "Releases"? "Other releases"? "Availability"? None of these are perfect, but maybe one is better than "Licensing"? Anyway, those are all I could come up with. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 02:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What about something like Media crossovers or Multimedia?  Something like that might work, since it's about movies, TV, and video games. <B>—Torchiest</B> talk/contribs 02:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Multimedia appearances"? MrMoustacheMM (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good one. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 03:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section titles 

message: I'm guessing the thought on removing those categories is that this article is about the song JJJ, which isn't a compilation album.  I checked the YOTP Collection article, which redirects here, and that page does have comp categories, so that kinda covers the bases on that.  I don't have a strong preference either way, but I figured I'd take a guess at the reasoning. <B>—Torchiest</B> talkedits 23:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if the editor who removed those comes back to remove them again (and hopefully provides an explanation this time), we can leave them off. For now, since the YOTP stuff is here anyway, I personally think they're worth keeping. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  compilation categories
Talk:Sin Sex & Salvation

message: It's been released on streaming services, thus being edited for the first time (I assume) in two decades! VictCoca (talk) 10:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Its being pressed to vinyl and compact disc as well. https://pigindustries.bandcamp.com/album/sin-sex-salvation-deluxe 216.212.99.60 (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Streaming release!!
Talk:Light (KMFDM song)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boots (KMFDM single) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 05:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process
Talk:Sucks (song)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boots (KMFDM single) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 05:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process
Talk:Split (KMFDM song)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Boots (KMFDM single) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 05:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: Check these links.  Even though he may not be listed as a contributor to the <I>remixes</I> of Piggybank, Go To Hell, and Naïve, he did participate in the original writing and composition of those three songs.  I think that would qualify him as a contributor, even as Sascha would be considered a contributor to a single even if he did none of the remixes, right?Torchiest (talk) 03:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. Just checked the CD (which failed to credit him on writing), not the site. Undid my own revision. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 05:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rudolph Naomi
Talk:Opium (KMFDM album)

message: I do not think these track times are correct for the 1984 casette version.  If you compare them to the 2002 remastered version, the track times are the same for each track number, even though the tracks themselves are in different order.
RijilV (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track times for cassette version 

message: I've put a Citation Needed tag on the 1984 tracklist, as well as the phrase "released in a slightly different form". I've only seen one page ever claim that 1984 tracklisting (and it was a fan-made site), and Sascha once claimed that the version released on CD was the same tracklist as the original cassette. But since this is a message board, I'm pretty sure it doesn't count as a reliable source. If someone can add a citation from a reliable source, that would be great. If a source hasn't shown up after a while, that tracklist should probably be deleted until some sort of legitimate info can be found. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found this great interview with some information on Opium: http://www.the-plague.net/kmfdm.htm . This is only part of a full interview featured in a magazine. It doesnt' have track listings, but if someone has the time to cite the interview there is some great information on how the originals and remasters came to be. Incredibly Obese Black Man (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a stab at it, called it "Re-release" (not "History" like my edit summary says). Might need to be paraphrased a little more. Good find! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 05:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1984 Tracklisting 

message: Are we sure this is a re-release of a real album from 1984? Can anyone produce a copy of the original 1984 release? Are we sure this isn't a publicity stunt designed to falsely extend the bands "lineage" further into the past?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.103.158.37 (talk) 06:55, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authenticity 

message: The album notes in the bandcamp page say that this is not the first KMFDM album, but more of a demo tape (as already described in the article). Should it be reorganized to elsewhere?
Googoie (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an album
Talk:UAIOE

message: has anyone ever found a reliable source that says that "en esch" is a cover of "demon's eye" by deep purple? the music's kinda close, but the lyrics are definitely from the dp song. if someone can find a source, it should be added to the article. 72.37.244.28 (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I've looked into that on and off, and haven't been able to find anything other than forum discussions and similar unreliable sources so far.  They don't even give proper credit to Deep Purple for the lyrics on KMFDM.KOM, which is a bit surprising.  Does anyone have the reissued version of the album?  Do they give credit in there? <B>—Torchiest</B> talkedits 16:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have it, and it just says Sascha and En. I haven't found a reliable source stating it either. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  demon's eye 

message: Yes, Reggae can be a descriptive of some of the songs, but it's actually Dub subgenre of Reggae. Dub was pretty big in the 80's, and KMFDM was obviously influenced by it on this album. JanderVK (talk) 13:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dub Reggae
Talk:Naïve/Hell to Go

message: Maybe we should merge this with Naïve.  The reason is because the Naïve page has the full track-listing of the re-release, which makes this page pretty superfluous.  We should just combine them, and tell the whole story all how all the different versions came to be and how they're different.  It's kinda like the JJJ problem we're looking at.  We could also add the separate remix album chronology and album infobox in the HTG section, just like I did with TYOTPC entry. Thoughts? 206.180.38.20 (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree to merge with Naive (this page is superfluous). However, this isn't a remix album, it's the album re-released with some songs remixed, intended to replace the recalled original. No additional infobox needed, the original infobox can have 2 release dates, and the green cover as an alternate cover. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 02:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Agree to merge.  Also, I believe Durante played guitars on all the remixed tracks on this release. Torchiest (talk) 13:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Naïve
Talk:Transcendence into the Peripheral

message: The album's name is Transcendence Into the Peripheral, a capital I in the "Into". The page name says " into." Can someone please fix that? GabenInABox (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name
Talk:Most Precious Blood (band)

message: As much as many people may appreciate this band, I think most people would agree that the religious meaning of the term Most Precious Blood is more important in the general scheme of things. I'm going to change the article title to Most Precious Blood (band) and redirect Most Precious Blood to Eucharist. --Ginkgo100talk 19:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: ...the ex-drummer of MPB/Indecision is not the on e who plays in the band "Great Big Sea", is he? I deleted the link to this guy...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.6.51.42 (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sean McCann 

message: MPB toured SA in September of 2005
http://www.metalunderground.com/bands/details.cfm?bandid=375&tab=news&page=2
Before them the only international 'metal' (used here as a broad umbrella term) band to tour SA was Sepultura in September of 2003
http://sepultura.uol.com.br/v6/en/tour_dates.php
I think this still makes MPB the first hardcore band to tour SA
--Juhan RSA (talk) 17:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st hardcore band to tour south africa 
Talk:Trigger (EP)

message: Given Trigger was the leading single off Reroute to Remain, I think it would help to better distinguish where and how information addresses the song versus the EP. Perhaps a rearrangement of how the article addresses the two. I haven't quite gathered whether EPs and singles typically intermingle like this on Wikipedia. Pixel Eater (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm aware the majority of this song's only notability was from the EP, I believe this is the limit. Rehevkor ✉ 03:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title song may warrant its own page, or at least some elaboration
Talk:Unabomber (album)

message: Allmusic has no information about an album called "Unabomber" by the band Macabre. The review in the article doesn't even link to the correct review. What's the deal? -albrozdude 18:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it does exist. I own a copy. So AMG is missing it. I removed the review. Spearhead 19:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Am I missing something? 
Talk:Babson College

message: This entire page relies on positive facts about the college. It is an obvious violation of WP:PROMOTION. Either multiple editors have relied too much on Babson's website for information or the college itself has extensively edited its own page. Please help in removing content that redirects to Babson's website and don't remove the primary sources template I have placed at the top. Curiocity1 (talk) 04:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Check it now; I reverted recent edits made by an undisclosed paid editor. ElKevbo (talk) 04:58, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Page violates promotion policy
Talk:Rathnew

message: - Population taken from: http://www.cso.ie/census/documents/vol1_entire.pdf
- I have removed claim on Boy George's family coming from Rathnew as it is not verified or referenced and was placed under "External links".  Happy to re-instate if re-inserted as part of the article and referenced. Nelson50 21:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Actually the "Illustrated road book of Ireland, Second Edition, Automobile Association , London (1970)" is a very useful geographical guide for most towns giving many details that are useful in these types of articles, so I have no problem in listing it as a reference. Mind you I don't have a copy here so don't recall the full extent of its usefulness. BTW, Sarah777 did you ever find out about the Gazetteer from the Stationery Office that I told you about? ww2censor 11:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have a copy here and it is the source of the Irish name translation.  We need more references on Wikipedia, not less.Nelson50 21:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By that logic then, it's a reference for every single village, town and city in Ireland so there is absolutely no need to list it here. It doesn't directly reference anything in the article (if it does, then make the link please), and it is not listed as a reference on any other town in Wicklow. Schcambo 20:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree we can overdo the references; for example myself (and many others) were routinely adding links to "Lists of Towns and villages in Ireland" and "List of census town in Ireland" and "List of census towns (2002)" to every hamlet. Then someone (not me) got a bright idea and deleted all except one ("Lists of Towns and villages in Ireland") across hundreds of articles. ww2censor, nope. Maybe just as well, I could be dangerous in possession of a book like that!(Sarah777 22:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref book
Talk:Cliff Yablonski

message: Can you source proof that Yablonski was written by this Al Derby? I searched google, and found that he had written some stuff for SA, but no proof he was behind Yablonski--Drat (Talk) 18:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lowtax stated in Al's SAclopedia entry (SA Forums login required) that "Al wrote one Cliff Yablonski update".  I don't think we can state that Yablonski was "originally written by" Al until evidence to the contrary is provided.  --FiddyCent 09:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Uglycat is, second to Cliff himself, the major star of the series and, what with his show-stealing insults, even more famous than Cliff himself.  He deserves his own page!  --Clyde 02:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No he doesn't. He is a sub-character. And a google search for "Uglycat" and "Cliff Yablonski" shows about 3-4 times as many hits for Yablonski (varies), and many of the Uglycat hits are unrelated. Trust me, if you make this page, consensus will likely be to delete or merge it. And of course he is "second to Cliff himself". He is the only other character than Enoch. If you want to write more about Uglycat, write it as a sub-section in this article.--Drat (Talk) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uglycat notability 

message: I think this article should be merged with Something Awful, it has 1 or 2 citable sources and consists mostly of WP:OR. It might not meet WP:WEB as no one has specifically written about it other than a "link  of the day" review. Something Awful has a fictional characters section where the first paragraph would fit in quite well. --Quirex 07:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Myotonia congenita

message: A suggestion to merge with the Thomsen disease article was made on 19 April 2009. No rationale was given for the suggested merge, nor did any further discussion take place. Furthermore, the merge is inappropriate as Thomsen disease is one form of myotonia congenita among many forms. If anything, the Thomsen disease article should be merged here. Because of the lack of rationale and discussion, and the inappropriateness of the merge, I've removed the template. --69.112.198.201 (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Thomsen Disease 

message: Why, in the See also section, is there a link to New Forest Pony? 109.152.150.192 (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ponies? 

message: I wonder whether the difference in rates between Scandinavia and the world is actually a difference in the persistence of medical examinations.
I'm not able to access the given references.
I am an American with Thompson Disease.  It took significant nagging on the part of my wife to get me to obtain a diagnosis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:5803:5530:342F:2316:3E8:86A3 (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology 

message: This section contains the disclaimer "(this is from first hand experience)", admitting that the material is purely original research. It's most likely a good idea for a medical editor to take on the task of turning this specific personal report into a description based on medical references. The expression "warm-up phenomenon" might have originated with the user who described it here; I'm not sure.--Quisqualis (talk) 14:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The warm-up phenomenon section is OR
Talk:Mickey Cochrane

message: The passage about Cochrane subsisting off Ty Cobb's generosity is denied by the Cochrane family in the Charlie Bevis SABR biography, so I removed it.Orsoni (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ty Cobb providing welfare

message: That's not Mickey Cochrane on the right - it's Al Simmons.TNMOA (talk) 14:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo of Foxx, Ruth Gehrig and Cochrane
Talk:Criticism of the Bible

message: I'm brand new to editing Wikipedia, but I noticed that there was a messed up external link in the archeology section. In the first quote by Dever, it has "...No archeologist thinks so. (location of previous reference) [...]" This link was just redirecting to msn.com, which isn't helpful.
The original link was to this http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/11/18/1679514.aspx. I used the wayback machine to find a way to access the original article via https://web.archive.org/web/20110812123824/http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2008/11/18/4350632-bible-gets-a-reality-check. I don't know the best way to fix this, so if someone could help with that, that would be great. I probably should have left it in there, but I figured it needs to actually be corrected either way so hope it's not a big deal. Thanks. NanoTech976 (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Reference (Help requested) 

message: I believe some books written by the prophets have legitimate authorship, such as Amoz and Jeremiah.Alexandre Newman (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia articles mainly act as summaries of reliable sources. Further, Wikipedia doesn't publish original research, so your interpretation of the Bible as a Wikipedia editor cannot be cited. If you know of reliable sources which discuss this as it relates to criticism of the Bible, please feel free to propose them here. Grayfell (talk) 05:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: In the authorship section there should be a mention of every undisputed author
Talk:Oenone Wood

message: 2005
UCI Points list - 1st place 
World Road Race Championships - 3rd place 
Rund um die Nurnberger Altstadt (Ger) World Cup - 3rd place 
GP de Plouay (Fra) World Cup - 6th place 
GP Wales World Cup - 3rd place 
Sparkassen Giro (cat. 1) - 2nd place 
Liberty Classic (cat. 1) - 4th place 
Le tour du Montreal (cat. 1) - 1st place GC, 2 stage victories 
Montreal (Can) World Cup - 2nd place 
Tour de l'Aude Cycliste Feminin (cat. 1) - 3 strage victories 
Castilla y Leon (Spa) World Cup - 5th place 
Tour de Berne (cat. 1) - 3rd place 
Fleche Wallonne (Bel) World Cup - 2nd place 
Primavera Rosa (Ita) World Cup - 3rd place 
New Zealand World Cup - 4th place 
Geelong (Aus) World Cup - 2nd place 
Geelong Tour (cat. 1) - 1st place GC, 2 stage victories 
2004
*UCI Points list - 3rd place
*World Time Trial Championships - 9th place
*Rund um die Nurnberger Altstadt (Ger) World Cup - 3rd place
*Rotterdam Tour (Ned) World Cup - 5th place
*GP de Plouay (Fra) World Cup - 3rd place
*Olympic Games Time Trial - 6th place
*Olympic Games Road Race - 4th place
*Giro d'Italia Femminile (cat. 1) - stage victory
*Pache Lausanne (cat. 1) - 1st place
*Fleche Wallonne (Bel) World Cup - 6th place
*Castilla y Leon (Spa) World Cup - 2nd place
*Primavera Rosa (Ita) World Cup - 3rd place
*Geelong (Aus) World Cup - 1st place
*Geelong Tour (cat. 1) - 1st place GC, stage victory
*Australian National Championships
**Road Race - 1st place
**Time Trial - 1st place
JFPerry 18:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Palmares
Talk:Railroad Redoubt

message: "Almost none of the men killed outright or who died shortly afterward of wounds are listed in Vicksburg National Cemetery.  Believe they were, in all probability, buried in a mass grave with many remains unidentified." - If we can get a source for this claim, please add it back in, but as it currently stands, it appears to be a speculation on the part of the original author. 97.102.30.205 (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed notes

message: I plan to construct a major article based on my initial stub. I have done much research related to the 77th Illinois Volunteer Infantry, which was one of the lead regiments in the assault on the Railroad Redoubt. Please stay tuned. Bart 18:41, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: For those who may chance upon this page:
Talk:Roger Babson

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- rpyle731talk 07:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: You may also wish to mention the chapter on Babson of that name by math and science writer Martin Gardner in his well-known book on science cranks, Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science.
Jimlue (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Sir Isaac Babson''

message: FYI, I just ran into the following article. Hollingsworth, F. N. (May 1923). "New Church to Receive Services Via Radio". Popular Mechanics. 39 (5): 663-664. About a church sponsored by Roger W. Babson. SchreiberBike | ⌨  04:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A church sponsored by Babson