Talk:NMR tube

message: Removed the tag because the article is notable and encyclopedic. If there are any other concerns they should be raised here first. --Rifleman 82 17:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed template:move to Wikibooks

message: I've been bold and merged NMR tube cleaner into this article. This is a dump of the talk page for reference:
===Removed template:move to Wikibooks===
Removed the tag because the article is notable and encyclopedic. If there are any other concerns they should be raised here first. Quantockgoblin 17:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Removed the tag because the article is notable and encyclopedic. If there are any other concerns they should be raised here first. Quantockgoblin 17:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed template:move to Wikibooks

message: Should we merge? I notice that everything in this article is in the NMR tube article; unless it can be fleshed out in much more detail without violating WP:NOT (and I dont' think it will be easy), I think we should replace this page with a redirect. --Rifleman 82 10:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[NMR tube]]

message: The cleaning section is largely a guide, which Wikipedia is not.  Also, it's uncited and unnecessarily complicated. Bottledmark (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree this section describes a common apparatus which is best understood through a functional description.  Anyone interested in NMR tubes would be interested in intimately linked glassware.  If the description can be simplified that would be great but I think its fine now. I'll look for a citation however a photo of an actual setup may be a better reference.--OMCV (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with OMVC, I did not know of the existence of such a tube and found my way here.  The need to and method of cleaning the tubes was very illuminating.  The avoidance of the chromic acid for other than toxicity reasons was also very thoughtfully indicated and avoids someone making the mistake if they are indifferent to the chrome toxicity issues but have the product available.  The way that the cleaning apparatus achieves maximum flow at the tip of the tube using vacuum to draw the solvent/detergent up is also brilliant, using vac in the centre would just cause cavitation and slow replenishment through the annular gap and using pressure in the centre would be a projectile launch danger, very cunning. The complexity is at a minimum and similar digressions have been found in encyclopaedia through the ages. Idyllic press (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning Section 

message: How are the tubes themselves made? what are they made of?? This seemingly pertinent information is missing from this article. -- œ™ 18:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expanding

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on NMR tube. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513142827/http://www.wilmad-labglass.com/services/NMR_010.jsp to http://www.wilmad-labglass.com/services/NMR_010.jsp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061213161841/http://www.torviq.com/NMR_Tube_Cleaner_Washer.htm to http://www.torviq.com/NMR_Tube_Cleaner_Washer.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)