Talk:Renault Alliance

message: Not having too much luck finding free or fair use images of this little beastie. Here's one I found, but it's tiny. Still, better than nothing? It's from a US government site. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/photos/1985_AMC_Alliance_W.jpg (EPA fuel economy site) ++Lar: t/c 22:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lar- I went to the vault today and found the image that I posted in the article. Everytime I go down to the basement I remind myself that I really do need to get the ads and brochures out of there. But there are so many, and they weigh so much...Stude62 03:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice image it is, too. I like how they had the model sit all skewed in the seat so that her head wasn't blocked by the pillar. We saved our brochures (the white convertible was bought new) for a long time, but not THIS long! Well done. ++Lar: t/c 03:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, the magic of commercial art. And oh, those automobile ads are stored with three-hundred or so dealer promotional models from the 1950s-1970s, all in their own boxes. I'm hoping that they all pay for my retirement in 30 years. Stude62 04:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: This article is rife with quotations, rather than citations, from the editorial pieces listed as sources. The appropriateness of those as sources for some statements aside, this is rather plainly copyvio. I'd say the article needs a rewrite (and merger with 9/11, it's still the same car, no matter how long Dick Teague stared at it). Kind, PrinceGloria (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been gone over carefully and there are no copy violations. As noted in the "Proposed merger discussion" above, there was no consensus to combine the articles, and there are valid reasons for this to be a separate article. CZmarlin (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvios gallore 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.caroftheyear.org/previous-winners/1982_1/coty http://www.caranddriver.com/features/dishonorable-mention-the-10-most-embarrassing-award-winners-in-automotive-history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 05:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for removing the violation. Does the template need to remain after your edit? CZmarlin (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The template alerts administrators that there are revisions in the history that need to be hidden via revision deletion. Once an administrator has done so, they will remove the template! Thanks, /wiae /tlk 12:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The template has now been removed by an administrator. /wiae /tlk 20:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed