lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Quirinus

message: Is it generally agreed that Quirinus was the genius (mythology) of the place, and that his cult was site-specific? or is it not? and should we mention this in the entry? Wetman 18:50, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an explanation of his original role into the article.  I think his early political importance was large enough to make him not-minor.  Bacchiad 03:12, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Was the festival for Quirinius held on the 17th of February according to the Gregorian or the Julian Calendar?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xact (talk • contribs) 23:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Roman calendar, which used the current months  even before Julius Caesar reorganized it in 46 BC.Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: :Georges Dumézil, in his Archaic Roman Religion, argues against the story of the Roman-Sabine fusion at the founding of the city.
So? Dumezil makes a lot of claims which nobody else believes. 
We shiould really be clearer, however, that Romulus, Tatius, and the whole of their history is as likely as not to be a later invention. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dumezil

message: I'll see if I can find any more information about the Quirinalia in the books I've got for my degree. Hopefully, there will be some more information that we can use to expand the section, which seems lonely as a one-liner. 78.146.132.102 Classics (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Festival 

message: Do any of the ancient sources mention of what he was the god of? Why did he have a cult at all?Ericl (talk) 22:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  God of ''WHAT????''
Wikipedia talk:Bureaucrat log

message: Bureaucrats seem to have lost the ability to make bureaucrats so I had to make Ilyanep one using the steward interface instead, which means it doesn't show up on this log. I'll report it as a bug. Angela. 23:07, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been fixed. And 1Angela has been desysopped again! Angela. 02:29, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: done--Jac16888 (talk) 20:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bureaucrat bug

message: Just need someone to remove the interwikis which are now at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q12103660 . Regards, — Moe Epsilon 20:29, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected edit request

message: There is a stripped tag Lint error in the page. Checking the page history, it was introduced following this edit. The error is in the line that begins with 14:57, 26 Jun 2004 -
14:57, 26 Jun 2004 Cecropia Rights for user "Johnleemk" set "+sysop+bureaucrat (the bureaucrat rights of this user were added accidentally and removed shortly thereafter; see the steward permissions requests archive on Meta)""</li>
The redundant "</li> at the end should be removed.
Protection template  can be added to the top of page as well.
 ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 07:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . — The Earwig (talk) 01:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 2 April 2021 

message: Please change * to log per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 3#Category:Wikipedia bureaucrats * Pppery * it has begun... 16:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Was done by . * Pppery * it has begun... 18:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 11 December 2021 

message: I'm just wonderingAmongusRanger (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Making a request at Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship and having the community approve you is technically the only requirement, but it's very unlikely you'll succeed without a few years of experience. Chess (talk) (please use  on reply) 23:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I get to be one?
Talk:Ehrhart polynomial

message: The polytope being "integral" means that all its corners are lattice points? AxelBoldt 20:03, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: Usually Ehrhart's theorem is stated for convex polytopes, but here convexity is not stated.  Is that correct?  McKay 16:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Do you happen to know where more general conditions are investigated?  McKay 08:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Try Peter McMullen's papers, e.g., Valuations and Euler-type relations on certain classes of convex polytopes, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 35, no. 1 (1977), 113-135, or Lattice invariant valuations on rational polytopes, Arch. Math. 31, no. 5 (1978), 509-516. Another good starting point might be Richard Stanley, Combinatorial reciprocity theorems, Advances in Math. 14 (1974), 194-253. Mattbeck 23:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, I'll check those out. --McKay 04:18, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: L(P,t) is a priori only defined for positive integers t. Ehrhart proved that L(P,t) is a quasipolynomial (if P is a rational polytope), and this quasipolynomial can be evaluated at other inputs, e.g., negative integers. Thus Ehrhart's reciprocity theorem gives an algebraic relation between two quasipolynomials, i.e., L(P,-t) is just an algebraic expression (it's the quasipolynomial L(P,t) where we plug in -t for t). Mattbeck (talk) 06:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ehrhart's theorem for non-convex polytopes 

message: This polyhedron would probably make sense as an example.
The volume is 43 - 18 = 46. The number of contained points is 53 - 24 = 101. --Watchduck (quack) 19:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example image
Talk:BitTorrent

message: Am I misunderstanding the essence of BitTorrent_(company)#BitTorrent_Bundle?  Please see this (attempt at a) discussion over whether we can/should link to Madonna's bundle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:IndianBio#Accusations_about_personal_behavior_that_lack_evidence_are_considered_personal_attacks...   It's hard to deal with someone who thinks users are uploadable to a website. <sic>   And conflates protocols, domains and hostnames.  And seems to be saying we need to delete this page section!  --50.201.195.170 (talk) 06:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is bundles.bittorrent.com is 'a download site which is prohibited and promotes copyright infringement'? 

message: If you install the Bittorrent Web, your PC will be riddled with bloat ware, malware, web browser extensions installed, search engine changed, etc.  Beware.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:9500:3180:BC17:E90:56BC:5C8E (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  bittorrent.com malware 

message: Are there any news stats for "As of 2013, BitTorrent has 15–27 million, concurrent users, at any time." seen on the last paragraph of the article summary? BitTorrent has expanded probably exponentially like the rest of the internet in those 7 years. DannyDouble (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update last paragraph of summary
Talk:Practice

message: I protest at teh redirect from and thus deletion of my definition for Practitioner.  Now it may be debated whether it belongs win this or that Wiki, but it doesn't deserve to be simply wiped out of existence... --Amedeo Felix 15:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the old page history for Practitioner and made it into an (incomplete) disambiguation page. John Vandenberg 08:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect & deletion of Practitioner 

message: As has been observed, this page is basically a disambiguation page in disguise, listing multiple meanings for the word "practice." NOTHING about it complies with the Manual of Style for disambiguation pages. Most of it is dictionary definitions without offering encyclopedic context. None of the information here is referenced, and it's almost certainly all original research. While merging the page's content to appropriate articles is a good idea in theory, I don't think any of the suggested target articles would benefit from adding this shallow and unreferenced content.
The best course of action that I see for this page is to replace everything with a properly formatted disambiguation page, linking to the articles Practice (learning method), Business process, and Cultural Practice (as well as the wiktionary entry for "practice", as is customary for dab pages and which avoids the need to list random definitions that have no corresponding article). Those are the only articles I'm aware of that could be a legitimate target or synonym for the term "practice", as per WP:Disambiguation#Lists. I would go ahead and do this, but I sense that it would probably be reverted; I'm therefore posting this discussion here before making any changes, to see if anyone actually does object. Propaniac (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What to do with this horrible page

message: The link of "Standards and Practices, a conventional, traditional, or otherwise standardised method" takes readers to "Broadcast Standards and Practices (US)", which is something totally different. Carlotm (talk) 00:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: The Intuitive experience of Monks, Fakirs, Yogis, others--toward Involution; A non-philosophical experience...Arnlodg (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be linked to a new main article--Practices and Ways
Talk:Scuba diving in the Cayman Islands

message: "Little Cayman features shallow dives as low at 20 feet and as deep as 6,000 feet."
No one is diving 6,000 feet deep. Recreational limits are 130 feet and tech divers (who wouldn't be tech diving here) range from 170-350 feet. Eric (talk) 22:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's pretty deep
Talk:Tetracyclic antidepressant

message: Are tetracyclic antidepressants based on the same tetracycle as tetracycline? Iridium77 23:48, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  As far as I'm aware Mirtazapine isn't a tetracyclic but falls into the 'novel' or 'atypical' group of antidepressants which also include venlafaxine, reboxetine and nefazodone. - Vaughan 09:29, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mirtazepine is a tetracyclic AD that is related to Mianserin.  It is even acknowledged in the product labeling:  http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2002/20415S9lbl.pdf ElBenevolente 16:38, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: My bad wording I'm afraid. I meant the drug has been discussed in the scientific literature but the drug is not publically available for use as a medication. Interesting FDA info by the way. So, this article should mention Mirtazepine and should not suffer from my poor english! - Vaughan 17:26, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I recall that mianserin was available in Europe in the past.  I didn't look too hard, but I found this reference:  "Mianserin (‘Bolvidon’, ‘Norval’) was withdrawn from the UK market after the introduction of mirtazapine" http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/publications/gaskell/samplechaps/usedrugs5Chap.pdf  It may still be available in other countries.ElBenevolente 18:12, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a link to the article on Mirtazapine I wrote. I also deleted the "see also" links, as they were all linked to already in the article. I wasn't sure if I went too far on that one, though, so please add those back if you think they should be there. Defenestration 18:37, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this old, scanned advert for setiptiline,  it seems setiptiline was once available. Archive where it was indicated that it was setipiline depicted in the advert is . Is it still available in Japan? 1992 isn't that long ago. Zaphraud 01:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: setiptiline availability

message: Coudl somebody point out, what portion of their chemical structure allows to classify these as tetracyclics?
Amoxapine is tricyclic, trazodone bicyclic.--84.163.110.20 (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amoxapine? Trazodone?
Talk:Armenians

message: We should add a section denying these theories, spread especially in Azeri and Turkish media, which speak of an alleged global influence of the Armenian diaspora that would be used to discreetly or directly support the Republic of Armenia in different ways. Examples would include the Argentine businessman Eduardo Eurnekian who opened a school in his name in Artzaj and who supports Javier Milei, or the influence that the diaspora would have in countries such as France or the United States. 186.32.216.229 (talk) 21:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as the name of the topic says it's a conspiracy theory, we shouldn't get too hasty about it,although what you said makes sense, I can't say whether it's true or not, whether agre with it or not, so, yeah it may make sense, but as it is a theory, I cannot say one thing or the other. 191.58.72.168 (talk) 14:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy Theories
Talk:Programming tool

message: Many thanks to the author of the new article on SCM History. These tools are part of an unremarked set, undiscussed on this page, until this edit. Yet what true practitioner can claim any kind of professional expertise without some use of a tool like RCS, CVS, PVCS, SCCS, SourceSafe, ClearCase, etc.169.207.115.129 00:10, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software configuration management (SCM) 

message: Msreeharsha 16:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem like it, I updated it a bit, but it can still use more work. Plus I think it needs some kind of better ordering, it's getting difficult to find things. Maybe alphabetical, or broken down into sub-categories based on the phase of development, or ...? Arthurrh 17:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the list of tool categories complete?

message: Many programmers feel that testing is an essential part of the development process, rather than a separate step.  So, I was surprised not to see any explicit coverage of test-related tools (eg, support for BDD, CI, TDD, etc.)  Is the feeling that these are subsumed under the other categories (eg, static analysis and formal verification tools, correctness checking tools)?
RichMorin (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What about testing?

message: #A programming tool or software development tool is a program or application that software developers use to create, debug, maintain, or otherwise support other programs and applications.
#Developers use simple databases (such as a file containing a list of important values) all the time as tools.
The introductory definition defines a (software development) tool as something executable. A file database is pure data, nothing executable. It could therefore, by the definition given, not be a tool. --Abdull (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubios 

message: B 185.117.149.179 (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hhhh
Talk:London deep-level shelters

message: Sorry, David, you are absolutely right about the in-text link "air raid shelter". All I can say is that I did quite a bit of linking on 16 Feb. and somehow got beyond myself. True, a link within the text should suffice. Have reverted to previous correct version. --Dieter Simon 00:23, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These shelters are not 12,000 feet (2.3 miles) long, they are more like 1,200-1,400 ft long. I think 12,000 ft has come from an incorrect transcription of part of the book "Rails through the clay" here. That number doesn't tally with what is given in the above document on that page (see http://www.subbrit.org.uk/rsg/features/deep_level_shelters/photo3.html) nor with the information on Google Books for the same book. Adambro (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length
Talk:New humanism (literature)

message: This statement doesn't seem to belong on this page.
:New Humanism is also a term sometimes applied to the Marxism-Humanism of Raya Dunayevskaya.
There is no Marxism-Humanism page and the term New Humanism doesn't appeary on Raya Dunayevskaya's page. Tedernst 16:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Though Marxism-Humanism is mentioned ... Charles Matthews 20:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but this is a page called New Humanism, not Marxism-Humanism. Tedernst 21:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Marxism-Humanism

message: This article was originally about Babbitt and More.  The Humanist Movement information was added later.  The Humanist Movement page is really where information about that use of the term belongs, not here.  We could put a disambiguation link at the top of this page pointing to the Humanist Movement page (and delete the info on this page about the Humanist Movement) or change the name of this page to New Humanism (Babbitt and More) (or some other name) and create a new page with this name that is a disambiguation page pointing to this page-renamed and to the Huamnist Movement page.  Opinions? Tedernst 16:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the backlinks, there is one from Argentine literature giving another meaning (which we should include). My solution: make this page just about the Babbitt-More trend; create a new page New Humanism (disambiguation) for all other usages. Charles Matthews 20:16, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, that sounds fine, too. Tedernst 21:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation 

message: we might need to disambiguate further because of an edit war over who is and who is not a humanist on humanism.  there is a New Humanism, in Catholicism in which JPII and Mother Theresa seem to be part. --Buridan 13:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New  Catholic Humanism

message: A clearer explanation as to what the New Humanist critical approach entails would be beneficial. --138.73.76.229 05:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity would be good here
Wikipedia talk:New user log

message: Please remove the WP:NEW shortcut on the transcluded template; it now redirects to Wikipedia:Article creation. 154.5.232.241 (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . Nthep (talk) 17:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 4 April 2020
Talk:Buddhist cuisine

message: I read about not allowed to use 'Five Acrid and Strong-smelling Vegetables' or "Five Spices" but I was wondering that if they could use the other ones in the same family? Or just those specific spices and vegetables are banned? — ~~~~ ChauTrang (talk) 06:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can Buddhists use the other veggie/spices in the same family? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Allicyn.h (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions
Talk:Paula Abdul

message: :Greeting, This article shows to have enjoyed 3,490 editors and 361 watchers since 2001. There are some issues that need resolving or the article reassessed as it does not pass the B-class criteria #1: , and #4, . The article is in the following categories,
* Articles with dead external links from November 2015
* Articles with dead external links from February 2017
* Articles needing additional references from May 2019
* Articles with dead external links from December 2021
* Articles with unsourced statements from January 2022
* Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from December 2022
:While "well-written" can be subjective it might be assumed that it also means following policies and guidelines. If that is so, then following WP:NPOV might be included. Anyway, maybe someone can look at these issues.  --  Otr500 (talk) 17:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues and classification 

message: The redirect Paul Abdul has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 06:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Paul Abdul]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This is a rather random question, but a lot of sources claim Paula Abdul has won seven "MTV Awards", yet her page only lists five wins. I can’t seem to find any information regarding two more wins. Any advice on where to possibly find these supposed missing two awards? I know MTV has had a few music award shows abroad overseas — past and present, but I’m not quite sure if she’s won any from abroad. Pillowdelight (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing awards?
Talk:Holdout problem

message: :This creates a different, sometimes unfair, situation between holders of new bonds and those of existing bonds. In addition it may delay the restructuring process and ultimately reduce the resource and capacity of the country to repay its debt. 
Phewee!  "Unfair"?  The country has defaulted!  Which is the polite word for theft in this context.  And the country has already demonstrated its inability to "repay its debt".  A slightly more NPOV account of this must be possible.  Paul Beardsell 03:20, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I have changed this to "unequal" which I consider more of a NPOV. --Vikingstad 09:01, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Not NPOV statement

message: Exactly this same problem occurs with commercial bonds.  Indeed the terminology is borrowed from ordinary commercial bonds.  Defaults on sovereign debt being almost unheard of until Peru, Argentina and Russia.  So the entire focus of the article is too narrow.  When I get time I will have a go editing.  Paul Beardsell 00:49, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This bond situation is merely one example of a much larger class of collective-action problems in which a few people try to extract above-average utility at the expense of the collective.  Eminent Domain is a solution to another example, public development, recently in the news thanks to the controversial Kelo vs. New London decision.  Refer to "The Calculus of Consent" by James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock for a wider discussion of the holdout problem. --Stephen Cobb <scobb_at_FreeStateProject.org> Also: http://www.freeliberal.com/archives/001168.html --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.218.67.254 (talk) 01:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only government bonds 
Talk:University at Albany, SUNY

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 14:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: University at Albany, SUNY →  – The brand identity of Albany states the only acceptable forms are "University at Albany" and "UAlbany". Obviously, this isn't the end-all-be-all, but "SUNY Albany" and "University of Albany" are explicitly called out in the "never use these" section (though not our current title of University at Albany, SUNY). Still, "University at Albany" appears to more common than "University at Albany, SUNY", looking at Google Trends for the last 12 months (this holds up over 5 years as well).
A couple of previous discussions on the title for this page (the 2017 RM, the moves in 2008) have stated potential confusions with institutions like Albany State College and institutions in Albany, Western Australia, but the first few pages of google search results under "University at Albany" in quotation marks only show results for this university. The last move request was closed as no consensus with the note that there were more GHits on a generic google search for the SUNY version, which is certainly no longer the case, either with or without quotation marks, even accounting for the fact that University at Albany will include results for University of Albany, SUNY given the fact that it's a part of the string (with quotation marks, it's 3.4mil for University at Albany vs 1.1mil for University at Albany, SUNY, which is over 3x as many). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 May 2023