lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Merpati Nusantara Airlines

message: The text regarding the crash in Kaimana on May 7, 2011 has been plagiarized from BBC. Is this permissible?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.224.120 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  may 7 crash 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster (What now?) 20:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Kargopol

message: It sounds like cargopolis =) --Юе Артеміс (talk) 11:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kargopol 

message: The link to the parascope.com article is dead, and parascope.com's domain is unregistered.
This article on "Russian Snowmen" mentions the Kargopol sighting:
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/creatures/russian.htm
104.246.47.236 (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged bigfoot sighting

message: I removed the section on the "Kargopol Bigfoot" because it looked like trivia and not notable. The only sourcing was to bigfootencounters.com and this dead link (latter being about something a bit different). Mellk (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bigfoot"
Talk:Serafino Cerva

message: When I got to this article, it looked like something that had been run through Babelfish.  Most of it made no sense at all, so I cut out all but two sentences.  Somebody needs to just start over here.  RedRollerskate 16:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Gbooks hits has "Serafino Cerva" (158) versus "Serafin Crijević" (58).--Zoupan 02:34, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Cis-acting

message: Go on ! --Dan|(talk) 13:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged as per discussion on this page and also on the target page, Talk:Cis-regulatory element. Would appreciate someone checking that the merge has been done correctly. Sarahburge (talk) 09:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Cis-regulatory element]] 

message: If a cis-acting element need only be contained on the same chromasome, does it then follow that the lacI gene product, the lac repressor protein, is also cis acting? I only ask because this conflicts with information in my Biochemistry 6th ed. Berg, Stryer etc
Anyone with a bit more expertise on the language and classification want to shed some light?
142.104.35.170 (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Glenealy, County Wicklow

message: I live here. During the summer (away from the pressures of college) I'll write a nice article about the place in general and the history of the town. I can get some more photos as well. --ISeeDeadPixels 16:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ace Combat X Super Aircraft

message: "No concensus (default to) keep"? I don't know about anyone else but there was CLEARLY no concensus on this matter, if anything the "merges" were winning! You people always talk about folloing the wikipedia rules yet at least on of you is clearly not following them if we keep getting results like this when there was no conclusion either way. Cbale2000 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Souvenir (play)

message: Judy Kaye starred in the Broadway production, not Judy Kuhn. The photograph (of Ms. Kaye) is also labeled incorrectly.
Can anyone list what music was part of the production?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.227.218.142 (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Krasnoyarsk

message: Can someone put some information about ecological situation in Krasnoyarsk? 
Spoiler Alert: Its really REALLY bad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.104.200.134 (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecology

message: I am sorry, I do not understand what is meant by "The Krasnoyarsk meteorite is important because it was (...) the first meteorite ever etched." How can a meteorite be "etched", by whom, and why? 2.36.89.222 (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  an 'etched' meteorite?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Article Improvement Drive

message: I tried to wade in to improve this article as the CCotM. It's quite a staggering task to perfect this article. I'd like to talk about it here before I do any damage, though. IMHO, a lot of the information simply doesn't belong in this article. Rather, they should be in the relevant related articles, such as solution, solvent, etc. Solubility should not attempt to encompass everything to do with this. Perhaps it should limit itself to 
# Definition (do we refer to the property of simply being able to dissolve, or the stricter definition (IUPAC) of the maximum amount of stuff which will dissolve?)
# What determines a substance's solubility (briefly, main article being solution), including a passing mention of factors such as temperature and/or pressure (for the case of gases)
# Applications of solubility in chemical processes, and everyday life e.g. making milk from powdered milk
Comments please! --Rifleman 82 16:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's a challenging article, but a very important one.  I think we need to address all of the above, and more.  IMHO, we should address both definitions of the term, as given here.  By the way, you might be interested to know the history of this page - it used to be called Soluble and was only changed a year ago.  I suspect a lot remains to be cleaned up from that, though solubility is a much better title IMHO.  I'd also like to reiterate my comments on the main page - we need to consider the related articles solvent and solution - that means not duplicating (or triplicating) a lot of information.  As for other topics, I'd like to see a discussion of factors that make something soluble (or not), such as polarity and lattice energy. Should we move this discussion to Talk:Solubility to bring in a broader set of opinions? Walkerma 06:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Solubility]]
Talk:Gunungsitoli

message: I have done a quick copy edit and found the quality of writing to be quite good. Coherent, informative, grammatical, and to the point. A pleasant read. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much~ ^^ Nyanardsan (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language
Talk:Luzhniki disaster

message: This match was not considered to be very important and there were very few of journalists on the stadium. The only good photos of the game, which depict the fans on the tribunes, I found only in the Italian "La tragedia segreta del Luzhniki" article. --Potorochin (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of the match 

message: Unfortunately, no video footage of the 1982 crush or its aftermath was made. But the footage from the match itself does exist. Different episodes from it, i.e. the moments of the first and the second goals were included in the documentaries about the Luzhniki disaster. --Potorochin (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video footage of the match
Talk:Feige–Fiat–Shamir identification scheme

message: The algorith given under the "procedure" heading describes the Fiat-Shamit identification scheme, which is not zero-knowledge. See the German wikipedia for the differences of Feige-Fiat_shamir and Fiat-Shamir.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.231.192.194 (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithm accuracy 

message: In ZKPs, it's traditional to use Peggy/Victor (prover/verifier) instead of Alice and Bob.
--Johnruble 15:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  participant names 

message: Could it be that  v_i ≡ s_i^2 ( mod n ) is wrong?
According to Trappe, Wade; Washington, Lawrence C. (2003). Introduction to Cryptography with Coding Theory  it is v_i ≡ s_i^(-2) ( mod n ) which is equal to v_i*s_i^2 ≡ (1 mod n)
138.246.2.114 (talk) 08:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ANSWER: To me, v_i ≡ s_i^2 ( mod n ) looks good! You propose v_i ≡ s_i^(-2)  which means  v_i^2 = s_i, i.e. squaring the public value yields the secret value. Squaring is easy mod N, so what you propose is not secure. (I didn't check Trappe et al).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.48.105.117 (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, if v_i ≡ s_i^(-2), then v_i^2 = s_i^(-4). The anonimous proposed that v_i ≡ s_i^2 is wrong is right! Schneier's "Applied cryptography" writes that the equation here is s_i = sqrt (v_i^-1), so if you square it, you'll get v_i^-1 = s_i^2, namely what the anonimous proposed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.227.192.150 (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Setup": Wrong equation? 

message: In the security section, a ZK simulator is proposed. This simulator is not sufficient: the x it outputs is always a square (a member of QR(N)), while this is not the case for honest commitments.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.48.105.117 (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZK simulator
Talk:Sriwijaya Air

message: I suggest to merge the articel 'Sriwijaya Air destinations' with the main article 'Sriwijaya Air'. The main article is very short, so I don't understand why these articles are split. --Shorty23sin (talk) 05:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not sight a logical reason to merge both articles. Instead of merging the article itself, consider helping us by editing it.Boeing7107isdelicious|SPRiCh miT meineN PiloteN  06:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge articles 

message: The text of the main article sounds like a (btw: bad) word-by-word-translation from their own indonesian press release. Maybe someone could write someting on a more neutral base? 125.162.47.86 (talk) 13:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Sriwijaya air has max 30 planes but the article suggest they have more planes then Garuda. Could not find anything firm on the net. Can anyone help to update this? Thanks --Shorty23sin (talk) 03:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of planes 

message: I suggest to separate NAM Air as a separate article, because the NAM Air has a good growth.Gsarwa (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article
Talk:Moscow uprising of 1648

message: So did they really tax salt? As salt is quite abundant and cheap and you can get by without using it, how did it cause a riot? Could the answer be added to the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.72.52.89 (talk) 17:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salt Tax? 

message: "All these problems came to a head on 1 June 1648, upon Alexei I’s return to Moscow from the Troitse-Sergiyeva Lavra monastery in the Ukraine."  The monastery is to the northeast of Moscow, while "Ukraine" generally refers to an area to the southwest.  This is clearly wrong. Calbaer (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Young Pioneers Stadium

message: In the lead we say it "was located in Moscow" and the page is in . The last sentence is, "At the present time it is used by the MYSL (Moscow Youth Soccer League)." 
Is the last sentence out of date? Was there a former stadium named "Young Pioneers Stadium" in the sports complex of another name? Or a former stadium nicknamed Young Pioneers Stadium in a sports complex of that name? Or simply a name change for persisting soccer football venue? Or is the soccer football venue(s) current but "defunct" because it hosts no professional soccer football club, nor major tournament?
--P64 (talk) 17:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past or present?
Talk:Impedance of free space

message: I'd guess that impedance of free space is a far commoner term than vacuum impedance, and that the latter is in turn far commoner than references to the band Impedance of Free Space. Google seems to confirm this with factors of 41 and 16 respectively.
:
Search term                                   	Google hits
"impedance of free space"                     	37,800
"vacuum impedance"                            	912
"impedance of free space" (IDM OR electronica)	57
I must concede that I've probalby missed some references to the band - I don't know mmuch about them, other than they've got a good name. Anyway, I'd like to move/rename vacuum impedance -> impedance of free space, and then add a hatnote like the one on this page: Kepone, linking to Impedance of Free Space. --catslash 17:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that Alessio Damato 16:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#
* Support linas 00:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: #
* Support linas 00:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: With the SI Units Redefinition, the numerical value will be subject to measurement and experimental error. This should be reflected in the article, and I leave it to those with a better understanding than I. Njsustain (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of SI redefinition
Talk:Streltsy uprising

message: Paul's work "The Military Revolution in Russia, 1550-1682" is not a proper source for that which he is cited. Ccxvi (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work by Paul 

message: Weren't the streltsy all temporarily abolished as regiments when this took place?  That's what streltsy currently says (abolished in '89, lifted a decade later).  What was the status of the groups that were being given these orders, starved, etc?  Was the title of streltsy something you kept after leaving your post?  Did the uprising men include former regiment members (since there had been many more a generation before)?  +sj+ 04:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead ref to streltsy status 

message: Peter is said to have initially tortured the rebels when he was not in Russia, then again when he returned. This is nonsensical.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF99:2080:B899:DAE4:C026:541B (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Aftermath'' confusion
Talk:December 6 (novel)

message: Context: Who wrote it and when?
Tone: Sounds like a review.  Be more WP:NPOV and informative.  See for instance To Kill a Mockingbird. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: needs plenty of input :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and context
Talk:Live 8 concert, Moscow

message: The facts here needs checking - i've been on this show and at least half of the line-up listed here is bogus info. These artists may have been scheduled to appear, but in reality only Bi2, Moral CodeX, Red Elvises, Linda, Jango, Agata and Dolphin did  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Echomain (talk • contribs) 09:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section
Talk:Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians

message: For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all  infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 16:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "related groups" info removed from infobox 

message: what is the relationship to the grand traverse band? 99.22.220.61 (talk) 00:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  so did the Grand Traverse Band previously encompass this area? 

message: Standing Rock has brought interest to the individual flags of the many nations participating in the protest. An image of the Little Traverse Bay band should be included. MMetro (talk) 04:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of flag
Talk:Zhdanov Doctrine

message: This article only has one cited source! I would add the template but I can't find it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.250.157 (talk) 01:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add the "need citations" template to the top of the article 

message: can somebody provide examples of paintings, books or other works complying with zhdanovism?
just to get an idea...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camilorojas (talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a strict crackdown on foreign influences ("cosmopolitanism") and pure art-for-art's sake ("formalism") to a greater degree than before, and stricter enforcement of the norms of socialist realism.  Many people at the end of the war thought that the cameraderie and sacrifices of the war years should lead to greater openness in the Soviet system, at least to the degree of allowing honest discussion as to what was the best way of achieving various already-decided goals.  The Zhdanov campaign was one way in which Stalin made it clear that there wasn't going to be any such openness. AnonMoos (talk) 10:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples 

message: This article falls short in several ways.  It currently doesn't mention anti-cosmopolitanism, and its title partially obscures the fact that it was a organized systematic government campaign of suppression, not just a theoretical doctrine.  One aspect of Zhdanovite anti-foreignism was an insistence that many things were originally invented in Russia, something that was widely mocked in the West during the 1950s and 1960s (even on the Star Trek original series)... AnonMoos (talk) 11:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Inadequacies of article
Talk:Libby Copeland

message: Creating controversy versus being controversial
Copeland writes controversial articles, but herself is not a controversial journalist.
Creating controversy deals with the content of journalist's writing. Being controversial has to do with the personal life of the reporter herself. 
Compare: Ann Coulter's editorial writing and statements to the media to support those writing are controversial, but their is little about her personal life which is truly controversial.  In contrast, Deborah Norville's journalism on the Today show was fairly straight-ahead, but the fact that she was perceived as ousting Jane Pauley was controversial.
-Cranky1000 17:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Soviet Russia Constitution of 1918

message: The copy of the consitution is 23 pages long and contains many entries, what's the special significance of private property rights? Cherry picking.
marxists.org is a bad reference.
The Stanford article makes no mention of the Soviet Russia Constitution of 1918, see WP:SYN.
Since the entire change has also been disputed, see also WP:ONUS. FDW777 (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherry picking, bad references and original research
Talk:1924 Constitution of the Soviet Union

message: can someone find an English translation of the original text plz? link at bottom does not work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.111.247.243 (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links are broken 

message: This article suggests that the role of the Communist Party was not made explicit until the 1977 Brezhnev constitution, but the article for the 1936 Stalin constitution seems to contradict this. From the 1936 constitution article: "The 1936 constitution specifically mentioned the role of the ruling All-Union Communist Party (b) for the first time. Article 126 stated that the Party was the "vanguard of the working people in their struggle to strengthen and develop the socialist system and representing the leading core of all organizations of the working people, both public and state". This provision was used to justify banning all other parties from functioning in the Soviet Union and legalizing the one-party state."
It seems like one or the other of these two articles needs to be updated to resolve the contradiction. Or if there is some subtlety here and it is not, in fact, a contradiction, then that should be made clearer and more explicit. Salsmachev (talk) 22:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with article on the 1936 constitution
Talk:Coorilose Geevarghese

message: Your bio doesn't belong on Wikipedia.  Shaundakulbara 17:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe the guidelines indicate that any person in a position of significant authority qualifies as notable. The subject is in fact a bishop of a recognized church, and on that basis qualifies as notable. On that basis, I am removing the tag from the article page. Badbilltucker 18:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability has been established 
Talk:Drew Neitzel

message: Is it me or does Neitzel resemble actor Wentworth Miller of Prison Break Fame? LukeTheSpook (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its just you.Epsoul (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Resemblance
Talk:Decree on Peace

message: This article is pretty useless, as it does not explain what the Decree was about. Wasn't the point to demand an end to war with Germany, and didn't this ultimately result in the surrender of territory to Germany e.g. Ukraine?
Just quoting some rambling revolutionary text whose meaning is unclear might belong in wikiquote or wikitext, but does not constitute an encyclopedia article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.140.242 (talk) 14:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless
Talk:Pete Phipps

message: The only thing I've been able to find out for certain is that he's a member of the Glitter band. He seems to be a session drummer that has filled in with other bands. All the internal Wikipedia links in the article lead to other bands that make no mention of him on the bands pages and I can't verify this. My first thought was to just cut this down to
that fact and reference the Glitter Band's webpage, but then would he really need his own page?
I'll nominate this for Deletion in a while if it doesn't get any attention from the tag's. It hasn't basically altered since it's creation in 2002, except for some vandalism noting that he was a thoroughly nice bloke. Not sure he's a notably thoroughly nice bloke though.Amentet (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I can source a few of the others, for example Denim - I'll take a look this evening.--Michig (talk) 07:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Does it look better now?--Michig (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled