Talk:George of the Jungle 2

message: Upon looking at the IMDB page for this film, the budget was listed as $12 million, URL: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0322389/business?ref_=tt_dt_bus. Noticing that this wasn't mentioned in the Wikipedia infobox I added the budget section and provided a reference as required, yet the section has been removed without any reason given. Why is this the case and what can I do to get the budget section added back up without being taken down again? I'm sure the change would be considered as "constructive" and there is no clear reason for omission.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.145.104 (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget section removed

message: :Image:Georgejungle2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Georgejungle2.jpg

message: Why is there no plot summary anymore? There was last time I looked. 24.65.125.227 (talk) 22:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I recently purged all of the useless nonsense from the cast list per WP:FILMCAST.  I also restored a 2009 version of the plot to the article.  That version of the plot was stable for several years before a two-punch series of plot bloat edits added a bunch of details that were not important to understanding the story (in particular, our coverage of it per WP:FILMPLOT guidelines), were filled with horrid grammar and juvenile phrasing, and a load of other problems.  I'm not opposed to critical details being added; I've brought it down to 560 words so there is room.  I am, however, wildly opposed to restoring a 1000+ word plot in violation of every site and project guideline and policy on writing about fiction, particularly when, once again, the trimmed version was stable for a number of years.  Millahnna (talk) 01:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The 700 word limit is a somewhat arbitrary limit, but it's in place because readers only need a brief summary of the film and most people don't want to read a 1000+ word essay. Bear in mind we only summarise the main narrative, and much of the extraneaous details you added are not necessary. I don't wish to be rude, but apart from the plot bloat, your level of written English is very poor which raises the question of whether you are competent enough to edit Wikipedia. Perhaps you could type your contributions in Word first and run a spell and grammar check? Betty Logan (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent cuts to plot and cast 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George of the Jungle 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140104205619/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/georgejungle2.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/georgejungle2.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified