lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cyril Houri

message: This reads like an autobiography, cites no sources, and probably fails the 'notability' requirement. This should be deleted.
: I tend to agree. Almost notable, certainly decent life coverage in one book, lots of news quotes with some focusing on the subject. But no sources is really bad for biographies. I'm not interested enough in the topic to work on this, especially if the subject may be non-notable. I'm not sure on the whole deletion process, so am hoping adding this notability tag will draw attention from someone who does know how to handle this. -Agyle 05:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Houghton Conquest

message: Somebody is very confused between Houghton House and Conquestbury, aka Houghtonbury.  These two houses are NOT the same.  All traces of Conquestbury were destroyed in the 1850's, when the current (still occupied) house was built.  The picture that is shown when some of the links on this page are followed is Houghton House.
:I have revamped this entire article, as Houghton Conquest refers to the village that both Conquestbury AND Houghton House were located. I have put the manor stuff under its own sub-heading in the history section, and tried to sort it out a bit. This section still requires further expansion and clarification though. Bleaney (talk) 21:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Manors in Houghton Conquest
Talk:Salesian College (Rupertswood)

message: I have added a new section on the sexual abuse controversy connected with the school, with reference to some of the priests and brothers convicted. This appears to be something others have tried to include, but had unsupported or unreferenced text reverted. The history of abuse is an important aspect of the story of Rupertswood and the Silesian Order. I anticipate this may be reverted and propose to ask for mediation if it turns into an edit war.Garyvines (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It should certainly have some coverage - I was surprised that it had been removed. At any rate, I've made some edits to remove some of the text naming people who weren't convicted, and generally tidied things up. Hopefully that's ok. - Bilby (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  The deleted and replaced paragraphs are covered in the summary paragraph already, which also has appropriate citations. also need to avoid unsubstantiated allegations Garyvines (talk) 03:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

text: The paragraph about Julian Fox should be removed unless he was convicted, per WP:BLPCRIME. Flat Out talk to me 03:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've removed two people who have not been convicted. - Bilby (talk) 04:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abuse controversy 

message: I have added 'Huw Ward' to the list as he is an up and coming young singer who has had a few successes. He is truly Notable
:You need to provide a source to support your claim. Please do not reinstate content that is in dispute. Also, please sign your talk page posts with the four tildes (~~~~) Flat Out let's discuss it 11:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni
Talk:Vaucluse College

message: Reasons given below for denying the move to the correct name are entirely incorrect. There is FCJ College, Benalla and Genazzano FCJ College as an example. The name to all past students, teachers and of course, the founders is Vaucluse College FCJ. It is referred to in all historical directories as Vaucluse College FCJ and is not just the acronym of those that ran the school but the actual name. It needs to be in the title because as it is, Vaucluse College is incorrect.  FCJ is common speech for anyone who refers to the school - even if it is not thought so by those editing. P
Also, this is severely affecting the use of wikipedia on social networking sites where there is now multiple incorrect names for the school because of erroneous editing by users who do not properly research their changes before making them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenellecleary (talk • contribs) 22:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion on move
Talk:Alisa Marić

message: See here: https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/36914/list-of-records-for-youngest-wfms-woman-fide-masters-since-1950-or-whenever/37084#37084
But are there any news articles or something to support this claim?
Thewriter006 (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  youngest WFM at the time of becoming WFM? 

message: According to the article, she is a WGM. On what source is this statement based? Bob.v.R (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Pawnkingthree, in my browser the FIDE only mentions the titles IM and WIM. Bob.v.R (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Here under "FIDE title" it says International Master, Woman Grandmaster. As the requirements for the IM title are actually higher than WGM, it would make no sense for her to hold the former but not the latter. Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for clarifying, I see now where you are looking. It appears now that the info at the FIDE website next to "FIDE title" is inconsistent with the info presented under "Titles", which was where I was looking. I guess we should assume, despite this inconsistency, that she is indeed a WGM. -- In general, I notice in the wikipedia articles about female chess players, that in case they are WGM and IM, both titles are mentioned. Bob.v.R (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you found a bug in the FIDE website.  (There are many.)  The Titles section at the bottom of IM Marić's profile page lists International Master (IM) 1993 twice.  One of those mentions should be WGM instead.  Concerning including both IM and WGM titles, wikipedia is following FIDE's practice.  As P-K3 notes, IM is a higher title than WGM, but strictly the women's titles are a distinct category from the general titles and aren't directly comparable.  FIDE rating lists have provided the highest general title and highest women's title in separate columns for at least a decade, so we try to handle them the same way.   Quale (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WGM
Talk:David Jacobson (director)

message: I am the creator of this page and do not feel it should be deleted. The reason being David Jacobson is a screenwriter and director without a wikipedia page, and wikipedia has pages for several others in his profession. Everything on the page is true and I have even provided a link to prove it.
You may have to add in a disambuation - there is another David Jacobson who just became American Ambassador to Canada. 24.77.81.154 (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This page needs to be expanded significantly.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Farman F.60 Goliath

message: I've created a short history of the goliath, added specs and the infobox as indicated. I'm new to this, so I hope I've done it correctly. It's not so easy to figure it all out, so I'm mostly trying to imitate as of now. Hope it's ok.
:That's very welcome, thanks. I've added some links to the article. Drutt 17:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is there no mention anywhere of the six aircraft which were supplied to Cuba? They were shipped by sea and assembled there and operated by the forerunner of Cubana. CubaCubana The Early Years (key.aero) Garstonboy (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:The Vampira Show

message: Is the kinescope discussed in the article of an actual show? I've been told that it was a recreation that the cast and crew did for a sales film produced by KABC-TV using the script from that show in 1954.Nitelinger 16:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This article states:
Ten years after The Vampira Show's first broadcast, ABC aired The Addams Family. The character of Morticia Addams (portrayed by Carolyn Jones), was modeled on Nurmi's Vampira character.
While the Vampira article states:
Nurmi herself claimed that Vampira's image was in part based on the Charles Addams New Yorker cartoon character "Morticia Addams", though she told BOXOFFICE Magazine in 1994 that she had intentionally deviated from Addams' mute and flat-chested creation, making her own TV character "campier and sexier" to avoid plagiarizing Addams' idea.
Is this a contradiction? Was the character of Vampira based on Morticia Addams or was it the other way around? Devil Master (talk) 14:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction?

message: In the fiction/biographical film Ed Wood, Vampira is fired from her job, and is thus available to work for Ed Wood. A closeup shot shows a fictitious newspaper article that reads, in part:
Is there any truth to this reason for her firing from KABC or KHJ?
It contradicts this article.
The book Vampira: Dark Goddess of Horror, by
W. Scott Poole, contains the following:
"Nurmi, and many who have written about her, have claimed that she
was 'blacklisted' from television after 1956...There seems to be
no sense in which Nurmi found herself out of work because of
politics, despite her tenuous connection to radicals like
Rudi Gernreich and Harry Hay."
Other Web sources present this contradiction (fired for refusing to
sign away her rights as Vampira to the station, versus fired for
Communist leanings) with no resolution. Shouldn't we be very curious
as to the actual reason for the firing? David Spector (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vampira fired for Communist leanings or not? 

message: It's right here on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs0ehPgyD3U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xfo_jCzRJuU  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.16.108 (talk) 00:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does it say no footage exists?
Talk:Elisa Jimenez

message: who wants to improve this page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.64.83.74 (talk • contribs)  30 September 2007 (UTC).
:I did. --Crunch (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And nicely done, too. 141.155.130.29 (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article says one of the magazines to have published her designs is "Paper Mag". Would that be the same magazine at Paper (magazine)? --EarthFurst (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper mag? 
Talk:Pine Island, New York

message: There is another Pine Island New York.  It lies in Long Island Sound off of the coast of New Rochelle in Westchester County.
GPS: 40.898112,-73.764656
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=pine+island+east+river&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&oe&safe=active&gws_rd=ssl&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&ei=xAJQVK2yFe_LsATb1YKgCw&ved=0CAkQ_AU&output=classic&dg=brw
Wikipedia should have a disambiguation page which includes this other Pine Island.
192.249.47.204 (talk) 21:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no reason to, that Pine Island is so small that it contains a dock, and a house and a couple other structures. Too obscure. Mitch32(The imitator dooms himself  to hopeless mediocrity.) 22:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Pine Island
Talk:Schematic capture

message: Merge it - Astrid Sanchez 190.28.81.140 15:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top.</br> The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --DavidCary (talk) 05:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
File talk:PeñascoBeach.jpg

message: Another pic had been in this file and was deleted. I think this is similar and one I took, so while it may be subject to replacement because it sucks, at least it isn't subject to deletion over copyright. Feel free to replace with a better shot... this shows the fast development in the area as of November 2006. Goeverywhere 15:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Pic
Talk:How the Irish Saved Civilization

message: My contribution to this article may have had some flaws but I do not think you improved it. In my opinion it would have been an improvement if you had modified the main imperfections and/or added some counterarguments in favour of the book. As far as I can see, my article does not read like an essay but like an extremely well-researched and well-referenced  review about a bad book. The original article was a stub, and there was a request by wikipedia to help improve it by expanding it. Moreover, Wikipedia is on the lookout for new authors and asks them "to be bold". If this is what happens to new authors on en.wikipedia, it is small wonder that there is a shortage of them. I have published stuff on de.wikipedia without any problems. Please show some respect for my work, which was extremely time-consuming. Alienllama (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it might be up to others to decide whether your contributions are "extremely well-researched and well-referenced". However, original research is not acceptable. It is good that you are bold, but please note that Wikipedia:Be bold says "Don't get upset if your bold edits get deleted." In any case, I stand by my initial assertion that amazon reviews are inappropriate. I'm sorry your initial experience has been frustrating, but I should point out that some of the material you added has been retained in the article. StAnselm (talk) 04:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could someone add one or two sentences on how civilization was saved by the Irish. The claim seems absurd - and the text as of now only repeats that they did it ... it's even unclear what is meant with 'civilization'.-Thomas (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: So how did they save what civilization
Talk:Back-chaining

message: This deserves to be much more widely known, not only in the classroom, but also outside it, from where the Mussorgsky example comes. Rothorpe 16:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is this? I was unable to find it.--Makswel (talk) 15:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kirkby-in-Ashfield

message: Original text in the third paragraph included " a
central junction where both the London Midland and Scottish Railway
and the Great Central Railway met".
This is chronologically incorrect as the LMS and GCR never existed
at the same time.  Also there has never been a connection between
ex-LMS and ex-GC lines at Kirkby.
I have modified the text to describe (but not name) the separate
junctions on the ex-Midland and ex-GC lines.  More detail could be
added but it ought to be in a separate section otherwise it will
dominate the main page and give the impression that Kirkby was a 
major railway junction.
Pmbarnes (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway History 
Talk:Bouillon cube

message: Stock cubes are not made of dehydrated broth. The main ingredients are Salt, Fat and hydrolytic modified protein (which is responsible for the "meaty" taste) plus flavour enhancer. Rainer Zenz, 87.185.111.154 (talk) 13:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dehydrated broth

message: * Bouillon cube were invented in company Liebig's Extract of Meat Company. 188.96.181.140 (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite.  Liebig invented meat extract, which is a viscous fluid, not dry like a bouillon cube.  But dehydrated stock existed long before that -- see the new reference in the article. --Macrakis (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There also was a predecessor, Portable soup. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 17:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  German invention
Category talk:2nd millennium

message: Hi there,
This category needs update.
Every (should) millennium-Category contains the following.
Most of them do have all this, but not all. For example 2nd millenium:
-------START(for 2nd millennium) :
Subcategory:
* All century's (x1st century - x0th century) DONE
* All decades (x010s - x990s) JUST STARTED
Pages
* The millennium page (xth_millennium) DONE
* All century's (x1st century - x0th century) DONE
* All decades (x010s - x990s) JUST STARTED
* All years (x000 - x999) JUST STARTED
-------
Well, all of the years is offcourse a liitle bit to much work. But is the rest should be done.
I've been working on this this day and yesterday, but it isn't easy and needs time.
If somebody wants to help(or a bot) please tell me on my Talk-page. Do not just do it, because wenn I am doing the same we are doing double work.
Same is for 1st, 3rd and 4th millennium.
User:TijhofGraphics 16:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  Please let's use a centralized discussion area.  My recommendation is Wikipedia talk:Timeline standards#Categorization and sort keys.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 02:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Doctor of Sciences

message: The main text of this article was copy-pasted from http://www.sfu.ca/~vkyrylov/explanation.html with the written permission of its author.
:Pursuant to Wikipedia's copyright policies, it is incumbent upon the individual who contributes copied material to Wikipedia to confirm that he or she has permission to do so.  Therefore, please follow the procedures specified at this link in order to confirm that you have received permission from the copyright holder.  Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks  17:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Natural Resources Acts

message: I've checked the federal statutes for 1930, and three of the four Acts simply use the phrase "Natural Resources Act" in their short title;  no "Transfer".  I think the article should use the same term as the Acts it refers to, so propose re-naming the article:  "Natural Resource Acts."  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: • No objections from anyone, so I went ahead and re-named the page. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to re-name this article:  Natural Resources Acts
Talk:Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it contains only the basic information on the subject, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 15:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: April 18th, 2011-  I reverted Good Olfactory's change...Sandra Morin and Warren McCall should be NDP party members, not Saskatchewan Party members as far as I could find. LC  —Preceding undated comment added 20:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction re party membership

message: The seating chart at the end of the article needs to be updated following the 2016 election. (I don't want to try - I'd likely screw it up somehow.  :) ) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Seating chart needs to be updated

message: The Constitution of Canada provides, in the Saskatchewan Act, that Saskatchewan has a Legislature, composed of the Lieutenant Governor and the Legislative Assembly.  It's therefore not correct to say that the Legislative Assembly is the same as the Legislature, so I've reverted a recent edit to that effect.  It's the same analysis as with the federal Parliament:  the House of Commons is not the Parliament;  the Legislative Assembly is not the Legislature. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between Legislature and Legislative Assembly
Category talk:1st millennium

message: Hi there,
This category needs update.
Every (should) millennium-Category contains the following.
Most of them do have all this, but not all. For example 1st millenium:
-------START(for 1st millennium) :
Subcategory:
* All century's (x1st century - x0th century) DONE
* All decades (x010s - x990s) amostNOTHING
Pages
* The millennium page (xth_millennium) DONE
* All century's (x1st century - x0th century) NOTHING
* All decades (x010s - x990s) NOTHING
* All years (x000 - x999) almostDONE
-------
I've been working on this this day and yesterday, but it isn't easy and needs time.
If somebody wants to help(or a bot) please tell me on my Talk-page. Do not just do it, because wen I am doing the same we are doing double work.
Same is for 2nd, 3rd and 4th millennium.
User:TijhofGraphics 16:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be discussed somewhere.  In the absence of a specific WikiProject, may I suggest Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Time?  My feeling is that each millennium category should only have the centuries as subcategories, and should not have the millennium page.  Furthermore, the individual years should be in :Category:Years, regardless of whether they are in decade, century, or millennium categories.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur Rubin (talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Let's try, instead, Wikipedia talk:Timeline standards#Categorization and sort keys.  Seems a better choice then a full WikiProject page.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 01:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Category talk:Stances

message: I think this category should be expanded to include the stances of other martial arts, such as Taekwondo, Praying Mantis Kung Fu, and Pencak Silat among many others. Angie Y. 16:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, then do it. Thanks,  Codelyoko193  Talk 20:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Greek exonyms

message: Why do pages like this exist?  Who ever looks at them?  If I need to know the Greek name for Paris, I won't look for Greek exonyms, I'll go to Paris and click on the interwiki column.
That each language has names for foreign places, adapted to their own phonology, is obvious.  So what is interesting about such a list?  What can we learn from it?  If it were restricted to Greek names that are not clearly related to the local or English names, or have been affected by false etymology, or shed light on the origins of non-Greek-speaking place-names – that could be interesting; but as it stands it's nothing but a dictionary.
Why do we need this article more than, say, List of Greek words for automobile engine parts? —Tamfang (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  why, why, why?
Talk:Bridgeview Vineyard and Winery

message: , , Brideview awards - Peregrine Fisher 16:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs

message: Sorry for being a rookie, but the history section of this wiki is a blatant advertisement for the website. Moreover, it is lifted directly from the owner's website, see here: http://www.bridgeviewwine.com/our-story/. Looking through the history of this page, it appears that the entire section was directly added on in one shot by a single IP address in 2010. It seems that someone is using the Wikipedia page to violate WP:PROMOTION in a very blatant way. I don't think that editing or sourcing the history will do it any good; instead, it might be better off to restore this page pre-2010, or just delete the History altogether.
ChunyangD (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section is blatant advertisement and directly taken from webpage 

message: I have removed two and a half paragraphs from the article, as a copyright violation of http://smalllotmn.com/bridgeview-winery/ .
What I removed was also unreferenced and promotional; so is most of the material still in the article. Maproom (talk) 08:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Jules Guyot

message: In the "Footnote 34: The strength of passion ... she has experienced the "spasme genesique," as described in a French work recently published and called "Breviare de l'Amour Experimental par le Dr. Jules Guyot." is this a different person? 68.106.86.206 (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana