Talk:Ishrat Jahan encounter killing

message: please discuss proposed changes here.
--vvarkey (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please no revert wars 

message: http://www.pucl.org/ seems to be politically biased website.
It cannot be considered as an authentic reference due to its affiliation and information which is a polotical opinion without citing any research, news article. Hence by making this website as a reference, it will curtail the fact and genuinity of the article.   
by the way. Ignornat people are using Wikipedia's misinformation on this page to discuss the recent finding of the Special Investigation Team that [this was a cold blooded murder on Times of India website http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Ishrat-Jahan-encounter-fake-says-SIT-report/articleshow/10816072.cms]
Ok.. Lets forget what prashant said, lets forget who was Ishrat Jehan. Lets talk about who were those two peoples died with ishrat jehan. as per wikipedia, I beleve they were pakistani nationals. What she was doing with those 2 peoples. Secondly acording to her mother, she was discussing about put an end to their financial problem, from where the money was coming. A 19yr old girl, going to pune to work with, where office were not yet setup. Before she was assassinated she was in Nasik, and a new person came to pick her up. Some stories says, gujrat police picked them from mumbai, why a team of police came to mumbai to pick some one specific. After reading the whole theory in wikipedia and other articles, I found something fishy. If all these theories are correct, I will give benefit of doubt to the police who killed. If these are wrong, then there are lot many truths are yet to come.
Raj (Bangalore) replies to bidhu 
21 Nov, 2011 08:04 PM
Reas the report! Encounter occured in the previous night and all of them were dumped together in a car.
India (India) replies to bidhu 
21 Nov, 2011 07:45 PM
But the question is, who should decide if they were terrorists or not. Had this been police, we would have seen another pakistan in place of India.
bidhu replies to India 
21 Nov, 2011 08:10 PM
SIT itself. why not. If SIT can say Ishrat jehan was killed in a fake encounter, then SIT has to tell us the identities of the her 2 fellow passengers. This was clear that, there were 3 peoples killed, why no one is asking about other 2 peoples. They were also humen beings. If they were from any radical group or any terorists, then I must ask what ishrat jehan was doing with them. No metter whats your religion is, if you are doing any crime or has a motive and planning to do, you should be tried in the court of law and get appropriate punishment.
Raj (Bangalore) replies to bidhu 
21 Nov, 2011 07:41 PM
Yes, there so many hidden truths in the state of Gujarat that no one believe that they occured in the past 9 years. One by one and all of them will come out in the next one or two years. Once they come out, it will set fire on butts of those who are ruling there.
Samastipura (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PUCL reference 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support : reason mentioned above Bheemsinh (talk) 13:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unless or until court convict, wikipedia has no right to convict Indian police, or pass the judgement. wikipedia is based on references not rumors. this is not as per WP:NPOV Bheemsinh (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed .... my concern about offensive title. any appropriate word can be substituted. title should meet WP:NDESC policy. Bheemsinh (talk) 05:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "Four-person police killing in Gujarat", "Four-person homicide case in Gujarat", or "2004 four-person police killing in Gujarat", or something similar? —BarrelProof (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I find that the image in this article is offensive. I am not sure what other thinks about it. I do not know what is policy of wikipedia regarding offensive images. I would request other experienced editors to give a thought about it and to remove the image if rules / guidelines says so. Thanks -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 10:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For the time being I am removing the image now. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 10:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *I have restored the image for the time being, you don't get to remove the image before arriving at a consensus here, have patience. Please explain why do you think it is offensive to you, as per the Wikipedia:Image use policy. The article is about an encounter killing...  --Ekabhishektalk 11:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * There is nothing offensive in the image. Even if the image is offensive (though it is not), Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. --Tito☸Dutta 16:39, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * I shall have no objection if community here accepts the image. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 03:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thanks. Being a doctor, I do not find any image as offensive. I was worried about lay person. It has been observed that generally people dont like offensive images. But if community here 'okeys' the image, I shall have no issue with it. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 10:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offensive image? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ishrat Jahan case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090911075238/http://www.hindustantimes.com/homepage/ahmedabad/Ishrat-Jahan-s-killing-staged-Judicial-probe-report/451517/H1-Article1-451368.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/homepage/ahmedabad/Ishrat-Jahan-s-killing-staged-Judicial-probe-report/451517/H1-Article1-451368.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090911195219/http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-09-08-voa15.cfm to http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-09-08-voa15.cfm
*Added  tag to http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-746863%2Cprtpage-1.cms
*Added  tag to http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/ishrat-19-cops-under-sit-scanner-to-be-quizzed/734544/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ishrat Jahan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 03:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The record of that RM discussion can now be found at Talk:Ishrat Jahan (lawyer). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Has there been a final court ruling that declared that the killings were unlawful? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outcome of court case(s)