lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musical Instruments/Assessment

message: There is no Normal column in the importance table. I can't correct this. --90.194.102.2 00:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know.... For now, it will be assessed as a "unassessed" article, but I'm working on changing this.  This is going to cause some fallout on the tables, but until I can get it working correctly, just, well, use your imagination, I guess...!... NDCompuGeek 07:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Abbotsfield, Tasmania

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: very close to start class, image would lift it there in my view However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 12:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:E-accounting

message: I request fellow wikipedians to distinguish and determine the differences between E-Accounting and Online Accounting, if there are any, since it is not very clear as to if it is the same service or not.
Ruzbehraja 06:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since online accounting is a redirect to E-accounting, this is more a naming issue than a merge. I feel online accounting gives a more clear message than E-accounting. Hence I suggest renaming this article to Online Accounting. --Dhshah 07:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  KEEP BOTH articles . 
The difference is that online refers to internet-enabled: 
while "e-" refers to "electronic" (i.e. not on paper)
Sanjiv swarup 08:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Point accepted --Dhshah 09:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Lada 112

message: This has exactly the same text as the Lada 110 article.  What differentiates the models?  Madbehemoth 06:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 112 is a hatchback, 110 is a saloon(sedan) and 111 is an estate car. KonstKaras (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alec Butler

message: I've recently noted that his original name was removed from the article on the grounds that it's "unethical and inconsiderate" to publish a trans person's birth name without their consent. However, the situation in this particular case, as with Chaz (Chastity) Bono or Barbra (Bill) Amesbury, is that Butler was already a prominent and notable writer under his former name before pursuing gender reassignment, and several of the works listed in this article were published under that name rather than as Alec. 
I do agree that in a circumstance where a transman becomes notable only under his male name, then we shouldn't include the birth name in our article in most cases, as it's private information if the person hasn't chosen to publicly reveal it. However, in Butler's case he has been publicly known by both names at different times in his career, meaning that: 
# the information is already out there on the public record,
# it would cause undue confusion to a reader who wants to seek out a copy of Radical Perversions: 2 Dyke Plays or Black Friday? and can't find them because they don't know the name those works were published under,
# the eminently notable film about his gender transition was called Audrey's Beard, meaning that the information would still be present in this article whether we acknowledged it in the lead or not.
Those are the reasons why the name is present in this article. Bearcat (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Does this article still need indefinite semi? You applied it in 2016. I'm aware of the DS, but it doesn't prevent unregistered editors from editing, from what I can see. The recent edits span years. Anarchyte (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection
Talk:Ajmiriganj Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
In 1907 Abidabaad became Ajmiriganj thana under Assam government. In 1983 Ajmiriganj thana was turned into an upazila. Name was derived from Aijadam > Ajmardan > Aijmadam > Abidabaad > Ajmiriganj. 
Ajmiriganj Upazila has an area of 224 km2, which is bounded by Sallah and Itna upazila to the north-west, Baniachang upazila to the east, Mithamain upazila to the south. It consists of 5 union parishads, 68 mouzas and 79 villages. The population is 86,810 (51.11% male, 48.89% female), with the literacy rate of 22.4% (28.2% male, 16.2% female). It needs to be mentioned that Jalsukh Krishna Govinda Public High School was established in 1876. 
Ajmiriganj Bazar (main town), on the other hand, consists of 2 mouzas, with an area of 5.73 km2. The total population is 13,829 (52.85% male, 47.15% female), with the literacy rate of 22.4%. The town has one Dak-Banglow. Town also have a number of buildings, which are from as early as 1800 and structurally beautiful, some of these were financed by Moharaja of Tripura. 
Ajmiriganj Upazila has 3 main rivers, they are Kalni, Kushiyara and Bheramahana. 
Main exports of Ajmiriganj Upazila are Shrimp, Frog-legs, and Dry-fish.
Aktar Ahmed, 06:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Baniachong Upazila

message: == Heading text ==Baniachong instead of Baniachang in the main name headings
Correction of subdivision from 1936 is wrong it could have been declared as a Thana or police subdivision from that period.
Spelling of Laur Kingdom has been spelled as Laud.
The descendants of the Kings (raja) are partially responsible for keeping the place underdeveloped. Mr Harun Raja was studying at St Hurst with the  ex president of Pakstand field Marshall Ayoub Khan and prevented to develop a all weather roads to the village from Habiganj (12 miles).   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Safiqkhan (talk • contribs) 04:12, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Taxicab Confessions

message: FAKE TAXI
CAST: PEDRO
.          PAULINE
.           BOWLS
It's called a documentary. Documentaries are not fake.
It can be called whatever, there is no standard industry certification to say that its a "non-fake documentary". The real question is whether it is scripted and/or staged for any part of the show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.30.109.2 (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

message: I'm watching one of the older seasons right now, and at the beginning of the show it says that they had real cab drivers giving real cab rides in cabs that were rigged with a camera. According to that, they are real cab drivers; just drivers that were pre-screened by HBO; but still real cab drivers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.96.176 (talk) 06:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cab Drivers
Talk:Bahubal Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
Bahubal was part of Raja Achak Narayan's Zamindari, but under Tripura. During Raja Achak Narayan's time (~1300-1360) the administrative centre was in Bishgawa. Than it was merged with Laksarpur, after Syed Nasiruddin taken over the power from Raja Achak Narayan.
In 1921 Bahubal thana was established, and 1983 it was turned into an upazila. Bahubal Upazila has an area of 250.66 sq km, and is bounded by Nabiganj upazila to the north, Chunarughat upazila to the south, Sreemangal upazila to the east and Habiganj Sadar upazila to the west. The total population is 1,37,402 (50.58% male, 49.42% female), with the literacy rate of 23% (28.8% male, 17.1% female). It needs to be mentioned that Dina Nath Institute was established in 1937.
Bahbal Bazar (main town), on the other hand, consists of 2 mouzas with an area of 2.12 sq. km. The town has a population of 2560 (53.09% male, 46.91% female), with the literacy rate of 48.3%. The town has one Dak-Banglow.
Bahubal Upazila has 4 main rivers, they are Korangi, Shwasanali, Yojnal, Kalishiri.
Aktar Ahmed, 06:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Chunarughat Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
Chunarughat thana was established in 1922, and 1983 turned into an upazila. Chunarughat Upazila has an area of 495.52 sq km, and is bounded by Habiganj Sadar and Bahubal upazilas to the north, Tripura to the south, Sreemangal upazila and Tripura to the east, Madhabpur upazila to the west. It consists of 10 union parishads, 165 mouzas and 377 villages. The total population of 2,33,752 (50.20% male, 49.80% female), with the literacy rate of 24.2% (31.4% male, 16.9% female). It needs to be mentioned that Dakkhinacharan Pilot High School, Gabtala Dakhil Madrasa and Agrani High School were established in 1928, 1933 and 1969 respectively. 
Chunarughat Bazar (main town) consists of 3 mouzas, with an area of 3.53 sq km. The population is 6,631 (53.10% male, 46.9% female), with the literacy rate of 46.5%. The town is well known as a business centre. The town has one Dak-Banglow.
Chunarughat Upazila has 3 main rivers, they are Khowai, Sutang, Karangi.
Aktar Ahmed, 07:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Habiganj Sadar Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
Habiganj Sadar Upazilla has an area of 253.74 sq km, and bounded by Baniachang and Nabiganj upazilas to the north, Chunarughat and Madhabpur upazilas to the south, Bahubal upazila to the east, Lakhai upazila to the west. 
Habiganj Municipality is consists of 9 wards and 64 mahallas. It has an area of 20.60 sq km with a population of 54178 (52.59% male and 47.41% female). The literacy rate is 59.9%. It needs to be mentioned that Laskarpur Primary School, Mirjapur Government Primary School, Fakirabad Government High School, Habiganj Government High School, Shaestaganj High School and Nizampur Dakhil Madrasa were established in 1818, 1885, 1890, 1883, 1918 and 1935 respectively. The Brindaban College was also established in 1935. In 1881, Habiganj Town Committee was established, and in 1913 it was turned into a municipality. During the British period an embankment was constructed along the Khoai river to protect the town. The main business centres are Chowdhury Bazar, Commercial Road and Hospital Road.
Habiganj Sadar Upazilla has 3 main rivers, they are Barak, Khowai and Sutung.
Aktar Ahmed, 07:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Lakhai Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
In 1922, Lakhai thana was established, and in 1983 turned into an upazila. Lakhai Upazila has an area of 196.56 sq km, and bounded by Austagram and Baniachang upazilas to the north, Nasirnagar upazila to the south, Habiganj Sadar, Madhabpur and Nasirnagar upazilas to the east, Austagram upazila to the west. It consists of 6 unions, 70 mouzas and 63 villages. The population is 1,10,219 (49.20% male, 50.80% female), with the literacy rate of 21.6% (27.8% male, 15.6% female). It needs to be mentioned that Lakhai ACRC High School, Barishal Karar High School and Bamoi High School were established in 1945, 1947 and 1961 respectively. 
Lakhai Bazar (main town) consists of 2 mouzas, with an area of 7.81 sq km. The population is 6,775 (48.53% male, 51.47% female) and the literacy rate is 49.5%. The town has one Dak-Banglow.
Lakhai Upazila has 2 main rivers, they are Tentulia and Meghna (lower).
Aktar Ahmed, 07:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Madhabpur Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
Madhabpur Upazila has an area of 294.27 sq km, and bounded by Lakhai and Habiganj Sadar upazilas to the north, Tripura to the south, Chunarughat upazila and Tripura to the east, Brahmanbaria Sadar and Nasirnagar upazilas to the west. It is consists of one municipality, 11 union parishads, 180 mouzas and 288 villages. The population is 2,50,069 (50.72% male, 49.28% female), with the literacy rate of 23.9% (30.8% male, 16.8% female).
Madhabpur Bazar (main town) consists of 9 wards and 15 mahallas. It has an area of 2.45 sq km, with the population of 17961 (51.77% male, 48.23% female), and the literacy rate of 57.5%. The town has one Dak-Banglow.
Aktar Ahmed, 07:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Nabiganj Upazila

message: The following text was in the Habiganj District article and needs to be incorporated into this article.
In 1839, Nabiganj thana was established, and in 1983 it was turned into an upazila. It has an area of 439.6 sq km, and bounded by Derai and Jagannathpur upazilas to the north, Habiganj Sadar and Bahubal upazilas to the south, Sreemangal, maulvi bazar Sadar and Balaganj upazilas to the east, Baniachang upazila to the west. It consists of one municipality, 13 union parishads, 218 mouzas and 359 villages. The population is 2,46,933 (50.27% male, 49.73% female), with the literacy rate of 26.4% (30.3% male, 22.5% female). It needs to mentioned that Nabiganj JK High School, Dinarpur High School and Pithuya Girls School were established in 1916, 1921 and 1943 respectively. 
Nabiganj Bazar (main town) consists of 9 wards and 20 mahallas. It has an area of 2.93 sq km, with a population of 19,243 (51.36% male, 48.64% female). The literacy rate of 26.4%. The town has one Dak-Banglow. 
Nabiganj Upazila's main rivers, they are Kushiyara and Barak.
Aktar Ahmed, 07:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Habiganj District
Talk:Weaver rail mount

message: Definition suggests it is a type of Picatinny rail, but later text says it is not the same ("similar ... but ... very different" contradicts itself). I suspect Picatinny and Weaver are two types of same thing, have same function, but differ in details (only slot spacing? how about cross-section shape?). What is the broader term? "Rail mount"? Maybe there should be an article for that, since Picatinny and Weaver articles have much duplication.--MajorHazard 07:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Picatinny rail 

message: Ok, while slightly comical in that its probably true (although there's no sources), is the IPod Touch mention on the list appropriate or should it be taken off? Dtheweather9 (talk) 03:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ipod Touch? 

message: Does anyone have any info about when it was a)invented and b) widely or officially adopted (for military issue) and importantly, what antecedents it has, such as the standard optic mounting adopted by Germany late in WW2? 81.97.71.186 (talk) 08:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This will link the article to the picatinny rail and Rail Intergration System articles as are similar in function and nature to the weaver rail mounting systemDreammaker182 (talk) 17:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added see also section 

message: I've just done a re-org, which I think improves things. What it needs now however is checking by those that know the subject to ensure that I've not got anything wrong. Snori (talk) 10:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experts please check! 

message: The article currently says:
"Weaver rails are continuous, while Picatinny rails are cut by the slots (like a dotted line) to neutralize expansion caused by barrel heating."
That sounds very interesting.
Can you describe that in an understandable way?
A drawing would help.
Also: This info belongs much more in Picatinny rail so it should be copied there.
--BjKa (talk) 22:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heat expansion 
Talk:Prophecy (film)

message: This article does not cite any sources particularly the production, release and novelization sections. This issue should be fixed and information on the film's reception should be added as well since it is missing such information.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and expansion
Talk:Take Down (1979 film)

message: I feel that either this page be merged or moved, already an article in Wikipedia called Take Down (film). 
Your1727|July 29, 2008
:Merged the histories. Kusma (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops.  Sorry.  Odd, I did a few searches and couldn't find the film.  Guess I didn't try hard enough. Rabidwolfe (talk) 04:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Skatetown, U.S.A.

message: Who is that "Marsha" (linked to "Marcia Brady") who is mentioned in 'Reception' section? Neither Marsha or Marcia appears anywhere else in this article. Clicking the link gets to Brady Bunch article, and it's quite bad citation, given that you must go to another article to understand it. Or maybe I'm just too young and in wrong country... 85.217.20.110 (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:S.O.S. Titanic

message: Ditto.--BobtheVila (talk) 18:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added cover image 

message: I suspect this in an error is based on the WP editor not understanding that PAL releases run about 4% faster that theatrical cuts. Theatrical film generally runs at 24 frames per second, PAL video runs at 25, and to simply things in the transfer to video in most cases just speeds up the film transfer to the PAL frame rate when making TV and home video copies. This could account for the supposed "loss" of 4-5 minutes from the run time of VHSs if the WPeditor was using the PAL release.88.105.18.106 (talk) 11:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "VHS edited to 98 minutes" - an error?
Talk:Bhadran, Gujarat

message: Some of this article, touching on history, comes verbatim from another online source.  It needs to be rewritten.Fconaway 07:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: hey people i do not get this at all it is so hard and plus this better not cost of I'm in trouble  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Footiestar (talk • contribs) 17:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hey
Talk:East Dunbartonshire

message: I would really like to see East Dunbartonshire merged with West Dunbartonshire. I mean really considering the land area it's a waste of resources having two tiny counties.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Series premiere (remake) (talk • contribs) 09:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this mean politically or on the wiki?  Each of the council areas has its own page so I guess East & West Dunbartonshire are included in that.Lord Spring Onion (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know this probably won't happen, but 

message: East Dunbartonshire has a coat of arms, which are springing up again on the boundaries. Does anyone have an appropriate picture of it? Macarism (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms
Talk:Online accounting

message: Why not merge this article with E-accounting 
Sanjiv swarup (talk) 08:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge ? 

message: Quicken Basic 2007 needs a Download.
Tally and eDeskOnline does not. 
So Quicken will lose the race. Alternatively, Quicken will have to change. 
Sanjiv swarup (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online accounting as a concept is practical 

message: eDeskOnline has Online accounting application and many people are successfully using this application, I propose to add a link to this site in the external link section. I am open for comments on this topic. Edeskonline (talk) 05:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  checked out the site : in fact I used the demo. Go ahead and put the link Sanjiv swarup (talk) 08:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: have an archive page for old and redundant comments Sanjiv swarup (talk) 10:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  have an archive page for old and redundant comments  

message: * can be attacked by viruses
    * the information can be changed by hackers,so it can not be acceptable accounting. 
but i don't think it is unacceptable accounting
I suggest there is no greater risk of viruses than off-line software. There may be greater risk of data being changed by hackers but I don't agree that this means it's unacceptable accounting.
Lnwright (talk) 01:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disadvantage
Talk:Fyodor Abramov

message: The only way this article could be more of a rip off of the Encyclopedia Britannic article is if it used the exact same words. As it is, it uses the format, organization and sentences of the original changing only words here and there. This is what happens when anonymous internet "ediotors" armed with cut-and-paste ability are given the ability to "create" without any editorial supervision. And while editors spend counltess hours combing articles for compliance with "WIKI Policies" no one is tasked with checking the acturacy, sourcing or adequacy of any article. AnthroMimus (talk) 23:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Russian Institute of Theatre Arts

message: The sources currently cited in the article all spell it "Shostakovsky", but the name has apparently been transliterated both ways. I found two additional sources which spell it "Shestakovsky": 
* Lourié, Arthur; Pring, S. W., translator (1931). Sergei Koussevitzky and His Epoch. New York: A. A. Knopf. . Read Books 2008 reprint: . Preview at Google Books.
* Sabaneeff, Leonid (July 1966). "A. N. Scriabin – A Memoir" Russian Review, 25 (3): 257–267. Restricted view at JSTOR.
I tried these Google searches:
* Shostakovsky (Peter OR Piotr OR Pyotr) -Wikipedia -Wiki : "About 846 results"
* Shestakovsky (Peter OR Piotr OR Pyotr) -Wikipedia -Wiki : "About 36 results"
I feel we should spell it "Shostakovsky", which seems to be used more commonly, with some sort of footnote giving the alternative transliteration as "Shestakovsky". Or if there is a source which specifically says that "Shostakovsky" is an incorrect transliteration, then "Shestakovsky" should be used with the source supporting that transliteration cited. But I think we need to say something about the alternative spellings in a footnote, and not leave it the way it is right now, which is confusing. --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shestakovsky or Shostakovsky? 
Talk:Galashki ambush

message: The NYT article has the date as May 12, not May 11 as stated in the article.  Toddst1 (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious date 