Talk:Hull Trains

message: I am getting conflicting info. Is this now only run by First or is it joint between First and Renaissance Trains? Simply south 17:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operator 

message: I removed the paragraph relating to these events as I didn't think either were that notable, and User:ACBest has re-instated them.  I'm happy to give way on the damaged 222, but the unit that was on fire was back in service two days later - why is the information about the fire notable?  If it's not, then it should be deleted. Dupont Circle 21:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ACBest 21:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of the damaged 222 and the fire on board a unit 

message: The article says that the ex-Hull Turbostars went to one, but I recall hearing that at least some went to First ScotRail. Which is correct? David Arthur 19:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hull 170s 

message: :Image:Hull trains logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hull trains logo.gif

message: I seem to have made a complete mess of the Hull Trains article while trying to change the tables, please revert this! Britishrailclass91 (talk) 10:53, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Adambro (talk) 10:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! 

message: This sounds very similar to its sister proposal Humber Coast and City Railway. Simply south not SS, sorry 14:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Via Spalding 

message: Hi
I dont know if anyone noticed, but there is still one left with HT... 222104
Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.173.37 (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 222s 

message: The article still states that the application to run the Harrogate service was rejected in January 2009, but will be reviewed in February 2009. First Harrogate Trains says that it was rejected finally in February 2009. 
I could update that, using the reference from First Harrogate Trains, but I don't know the status of other items in that section. It wuld be better if somebody familiar with it updated it. --ColinFine (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible future expansion

message: First seem to be removing their name from their franchises with Great Western soon to become GWR and now Hull Trains have a new logo with no Flying F or First name. Time to rename the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enotayokel (talk • contribs) 15:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back to Hull Trains again 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hull Trains. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.hulltrains.co.uk/pr08-02.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hull trains now goes to cottingham directly. do you think this article and the infromation should be added or nah? 
source:
https://www.europeanrailwayreview.com/33418/rail-industry-news/london-cottingham-hull-trains/
Wkc19 :) (talk) 13:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  London to cottingham 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hull Trains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081121080250/http://www.hulltrains.co.uk/pdfs/pio7.pdf to http://www.hulltrains.co.uk/pdfs/pio7.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625114115/http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/s18-ECML-Hull_Trains.pdf to http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/s18-ECML-Hull_Trains.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304092023/http://orr.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/19489/hull-trains-limited-s17-hull-trains-response-to-network-rail-representations.pdf to http://orr.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/19489/hull-trains-limited-s17-hull-trains-response-to-network-rail-representations.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Would anyone be able to provide an image of a Hull Trains Class 802 in its livery please? The current image is only an impressionist image and does not resemble the actual look of the train. SavageKieran (talk) 03:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image for Class 802 

message: First Harrogate Trains never really was, the legal entity was wound up after only a year having never been anything other than a dormant company. The application to operate the proposed Harrogate service was made by Hull Trains, so really First Harrogate Trains was just a division of Hull Trains, as noted when nominated for deletion in 2008. It survived as at that stage its bid was still alive, but 15 years on and it clearly never was. Propose merging. Airpopg (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Neutral I don't object but neither do I see any strong need to change. 10mmsocket (talk) 06:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Weak oppose Don't see any real need for the merge myself; FHT (as far as I can make out) is a separate entity to HT; just because HT owned it, doesn't mean they are one and the same, IMO. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal