lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tsipouro

message: Is Tsipouro flavored with anise or any other flavor(s)?  Badagnani 02:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know no. I removed the corresponding category. --Kupirijo 02:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not traditional! If you find more than one company it would be interesting. This pertains to this company only. I would be reluctant to say that tsipouro is anise flavored. When we say tsipouro in Greece we mean pomace distillate. --Kupirijo 02:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: But that is rare. It only happens with the brand you showed me. I wouldn't even bother, otherwise you will be adding a commercial link, promoting that brand. --Kupirijo 03:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: OK. You win. Just make sure you distinguish between Tsipouro and Flavored Tsipouro. We do not people to confuse it with ouzo. --Kupirijo 03:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Where does http://kosisland.info/news.asp?ItemID=264&pcid=63&cid=64&archive=yes say it can have anise? --Kupirijo 03:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Tsipouro and tsikoudia are considered variants of ouzo, produced by a similar process but often without anise flavouring and often tastes similar to the Italian spirit grappa."
To me, if tsipouro can "often" be "without" anise flavoring, then it can sometimes have it.  But, as you say, it's usually historically been considered a "raw" spirit like vodka, moonshine, or poitín.  So the flavored version must then be a borrowing from ouzo, arak, or raki.  At least it deserves a mention.  Badagnani 03:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Good job. --Kupirijo 03:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: And in Volos they serve anise-flavored tsipouro with seafood mezzes. Jd2718 (talk) 16:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flavored?

message: Can we get the etymology of this word?  Does "tsipouro" have a meaning that has something to do with its production or source, like "moonshine"?  Badagnani 03:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its etymology is not certain. Apparently "tsipoura" means "pomace", but the word is of tatar origin ("sepre"). In ancient Greek, pomace is called "stemphyla" which is not considered the root of "tsipouro". In cypriot greek it is pronounced "tsippouro". The "pp" indicates a turkish/tatar origin but one can also say it is the assimilation of "m" in "mph" to "pp". --Kupirijo 04:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Tsipouro and tsikoudia are similar with a major difference: The first is typically doubly or multiply distilled while the second is singly distilled. 
Rickproser (talk) 12:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose merge
Talk:Demonweb Pits

message: There seems to have been some disagreement if the Demonweb Pits should be included in the :Category:Fictional dimensions. I think it should not, because it is just one layer of an outer plane in the D&D multiverse. I think I would call that as a whole a fictional dimension, with maybe the demiplane of time as an extra one (although I have to confess that pocket dimensions are often mentioned in D&D). I don't know about The War of the Spider Queen, so I can't say if that warrants an entry as a fictional dimension.
Does anyone have any arguments against removing that category from this article?
Daranios 16:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really have no opinion one way or the other. The DwP is part of the Abyss in the core rules, but I do think that the Forgotten Realms cosmology has separated it from the Abyss.--Robbstrd 20:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional dimension?
Talk:Hippogriff (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974-1976), as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 02:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As there were no responses, I redirected this article to the list page.  Since no response is also no consensus, any editor may restore this article at any time. However, rather than simply reverting, I urge you to use this space to develop some form of consensus regarding the article, lest another editor put this article up for deletion. BOZ (talk) 02:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected

message: I am restoring this article to add a publication history section.  If, afterwards, it is believed that this article should be redirected once again, you may do so. BOZ (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored

message: There is no third party evidence that the Pathfinder Hippogriff is an appearance of the D&D hippogriff. To make such a conclusion from the sole source of the Pathfinder Bestiary, one would have to know that Pathfinder was a D&D clone, and compare the hippogriff in the Pathfinder game book to the hippogriff in the D&D game books, a set of analysis and comparisons and WP:SYNthesising content from multiple sources that is not allowed under WP:OR. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:Charentsavan

message: adding a climate classification based on this website:https://weatherandclimate.com/armenia/kotayk/charentsavan דולב חולב (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:Andy Fox

message: This used to be an article about the mother in FoxTrot. However, all the individual articles for the separate characters in that comic strip were converted into re-directs. I noticed a number of baseball articles included a player named Andy Fox, and linked to this article. I don't really follow baseball so I know little about this player. I put together what I could gather from the baseball articles that linked here. Someone who knows more about baseball should correct any errors I've made and expand this. Agent 86 02:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in topic
Talk:Terrestrial ecology

message: "Changes in the seasonal timing and duration of water levels could affect the species composition of plant and animal communities in the study area by changes to the structure of riparian habitats ..."
Is this a copy of an essay or report on some particular area or ecosystem??? Avalon 02:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An essay/report on a particular ecosystem?

message: It reads like part of an essay or a textbook. I've proposed merger with Soil ecology. Please comment.Itsmejudith 17:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree merge though I doubt you will find anything worth merging from this 'article' Abtract 19:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree, anything generally applicable to soil ecology could be merged into that article. Avalon 19:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To merge or not to merge? A no-brainer this one.
Talk:Argentine surrender in the Falklands War

message: This article should be redirected to Falklands war with relevant info merged. If there is opposition to this I will afd the article, SqueakBox 02:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the opposition appeared on my talk page, SqueakBox 02:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I expanded it with some Argentines issues which were not included. Would be nice to know the destinations of all those trucks! --Jor70 (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Jor just so you know, "booty" is a term used in Britain exclusively for pirates. I have attempted to make the section header more neutral, but am open to any other ideas. Ryan4314  (talk) 12:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The trucks mainly ended up as range targets.  The Mercedes were used for years but I think there is only 1 usable these days.  Argentina hadn't paid for them and refused to cough up the dough to Mercedes Argentina.  When the British tried to order spares, Mercedes refused to supply them unless the UK settled the Argentine bill.  The MoD ended up buying spares direct from a UK dealership bypassing Mercedes altogether.  Justin the Evil Scotsman talk 12:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the "Red and Green Life Machine" by Rick Jolly, the Argentine Government refused to provide transport back to the mainland for the surrendered garrison which meant the British had to use the Canberra.  Justin the Evil Scotsman talk 12:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the c/e Ryan. I didnt know that about the ships, but would not surprise me given the treatment they received back on the continent later --Jor70 (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded

message: Shouldn't it be called captured Argentine equipment. Creuzbourg (talk) 22:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confiscated Argentine equipment
Talk:Category of groups

message: Other than having to be careful about what is meant by the cokernel in Gp is there actually anything that prevents the Snake Lemma from working?
:Well, the standard proof certainly doesn't work in Grp since it uses the difference of morphisms. AxelBoldt (talk) 00:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Under "Relation to other categories"; 
This seems wrong as stated, perhaps requiring a citation.  AFAIK The Grothendieck Group is defined for commutative monoids only, and this is reflected in the linked article on that subject.  A functor cannot act partially; a functor K:Mon -> Grp must assign to every monoid a group.  
So, to what group do we assign a non-commutative monoid M? The trivial group? The Grothendieck group of the largest abelian submonoid of M? As a non-expert that seems a non-trivial choice to me, and at least requires mention or citation. 75.81.80.223 (talk) 17:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "K: Mon→Grp the functor sending every monoid to the Grothendieck group of that monoid."
Talk:Bostrichidae

message: Bostrichidae are more often known as auger beetles, rather than false powder post beetles. Should the information on this page be merged with the auger beetle page?--Lauriec 22:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-foreign-secretaries/william-grenville. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AntientNestor (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:History of Nunavut

message: I've been working on a new template for the Histories of the Provinces.  See here:
Do you think we need it?  And is this the right format for it?  Thanks. Kevlar67 02:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Template 
Talk:Protea

message: Errors in distribution and title. Needs a rewrite 
--67.49.250.179 02:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So add something Cas Liber 08:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for that. Proteas now redirects to Protea (disambiguation). Hesperian 23:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Need a section on the former use of Protea repens (Common Sugarbush Protea) as sugar source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.211.95 (talk) 03:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Section on Sugar Use
Talk:Alumni Stadium

message: During a preseason game against the Washington Redskins, the grandstand caught on fire. It was quite  spectacular, as I recall, even on black-and-white TV.  Flames all over tplace, fans fleeing to the field level, &c.  I would expect there'd be an archived account in one of the local newspapers. Malbuff (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1969 fire 

message: With such a common name, this should be a disambiguation page. There are also Alumni Stadium (Delaware State), Albert J. Sloan-Alumni Stadium and Alumni Stadium (BJU)—not to mention the redirect of Alumni Stadium (Kean University) that could have its own page if someone were to create it—but none of those can be easily found just by going to "Alumni Stadium". I propose a disambig page. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to such a change, although it does appear that this Alumni Stadium is the most notable and per WP:PT could probably retain its title and simply offer a hatnote linking to a new Alumni Stadium (disambiguation) page where the list of similarly-named stadia could be hosted. But turning this page into the disambiguation page and moving its content to something like Alumni Stadium (Boston College) could be an option. WildCowboy (talk) 18:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Revised opinion – About a day or so after posting this inquiry I actually realized that it would be probably unnecessary to move this page. I also now think that an  tag would work just fine. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't this the disambig page?
Talk:Human rights in Bangladesh

message: Hi all, there are sources in the "Recent Corruption" section that are cited but do not match Wikipedia's format. Please help  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogersjmbeloit (talk • contribs) 04:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no such institution as the Rajshahi Medical School Hospital. The correct name for this should be 'Rajshahi Medical College Hospital'. I am not making the correction myself as this article is a sensitive one and might ruffle some feathers. Thanks. Abul Bakhtiar (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torture 
Talk:Lectin pathway

message: I thought it was the Mannose binding pathway.  Anyone? Lskatz 17:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe "Lectin pathway" is the more common name; the book from Janeway "Immunobiology" also uses this term predominantly. 2A02:8388:1601:E000:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mannose? 

message: I know mannose is found on self glycoprotein and proteoglycans.  Can someone explain the spacing of mannose molecules on pathogens and how it can activate this pathway while self-mannose containing molecules do not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.173.26 (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mannose on self molecules 

message: Just wondering if this is part of the innate response? My textbook says so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.197.54.33 (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innate response 

message: In good textbooks like Janeway's Immunobiology, there are good drawings of all 3 pathways and also where they interact with one another (if at all). The Wikipedia articles currently shows no such image. Would it be possible to add it? 2A02:8388:1601:E000:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overview of the Pathway
Talk:IL-2 receptor

message: Why does this article have to be so detailed? I mean, if anyone need to know the receptor affinity they will not look it up on wikipedia (since wikipedia is not a trusted source in scentific matters). Would be better to just describe it's role in a physiological context. /80.217.232.217 18:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too detailed 

message: This page is about the same gene as IL2RA, the pages should be merged. AstarothCY (talk) 16:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think that, I'm curious to know what you think we should do with IL2RB? CV9933 (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point, I think that helps me clarify what my concern is with this page, which is the gene/locus information in the sidebar. As would be my preference, those identifiers would need to be removed entirely from this article as they are already present in the corresponding article for each subunit (and those articles are linked to in the article already). As an example, the article for another dimeric protein, LFA-1, does not contain any such identifiers, though that article is also problematic as it does not properly link to the appropriate subunit-specific articles (which do exist). Would it make sense to then keep this article but simply remove the gene identifiers? AstarothCY (talk) 07:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for sharing your views. The article sidebar has three info-boxes containing very handy links which allow the reader to quickly reference further information. Although the three info-boxes located together, cause you some concern, for me that configuration gives  a better clue to what this article is about. The lede sentence contains a link to a protein trimer which helps further  in understanding the structure of this protein. I don't doubt the validity of your concerns though, we have many articles tagged as too technical so there is always a requirement for us to make these aricles as accessible as possible.  CV9933 (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[IL2RA]]
Talk:Rafflesiaceae

message: I believe this article may have been reverted back in error. According to this article the family has now been found. The authenticity of this article should be accepted.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6251517.stm
The BBC claim that Charles Davis will be publishing his findings in the journal Science.
In particular I feel that the panel on the right hand side of page indicating the family should be changed.  
I did provide the link in the edit summary. 
If for any reason you feel that my arguement is not sound please let me know.
Sdp1978 10:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, the linked "article" is a secondary source, a news story about the original research and the paper that was published (and so far, published only online). Second, nobody working on this Wikipedia article, as far as I can tell, has actually read the original article.  So I don't think anybody can confirm whether the authors have officially classified Rafflesia and its relatives in Euphorbiaceae--the abstract at Science doesn't suggest that. The classification of Euphorbiaceae is still a bit of a mess, and at least some genera have been removed to their own families, so I would actually be surprised if they took that step. Perhaps they have, but I want to read the original research paper in its entirety, or see confirmation that somebody else has, before these changes are made. MrDarwin 14:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your right I shouldn't have used the word article, I hope that wasn't a cheap shot at me. I think it would be appropriate to mention C Davis's findings Sdp1978 14:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: could be used in this article. -- Cirt (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New free use image
Talk:Common gamma chain

message: IL2RG is an old term for this protein. It will likely stick around for a while, but because this cytokine receptor is common to at least 6 cytokines, it is no longer considered just "interleukin-2 receptor". The preferred article should be Common gamma chain, Cytokine receptor common gamma chain or Common γ chain.--ZayZayEM (talk) 06:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IL2RG

message: Hi.  I agree that the nomenclature is rather confusing.  However the name IL2RG is definitely not out-of-date since it is the currently accepted official Human Genome Organisation gene name (see ).  There are a lot of names one could call this gene/protein including:
* interleukin 2 receptor, gamma (IL2RG)
* interleukin receptor, common gamma chain
* interleukin receptor, gamma-c
* CD132 antigen (cluster of differentiation 132)
I would suggest that we rename this article as "interleukin receptor, common gamma chain", with the lead reading:
Interleukin receptor, common gamma chain also known as interleukin 2 receptor, gamma (IL2RG) or CD132 (cluster of differentiation 132) is a protein which in humans is encoded by the IL2RG gene.
Also I agree that the contents of this article be merged with the IL2RG article since the subject matter of both articles deals with the same gene/protein. Does this sound reasonable?  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 12:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gene/protein name
File talk:Information.png

message: Could someone add that template on this page ?
:Done. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 04:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I added an svg version to the commons  here. Please add the Vector version available code to the protected page.  Bobarino 03:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 08:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SVG Version Available

message: Please add . Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit protected request 

message: Please remove  and replace  with  Bulwersator (talk) 14:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done I also rewrote the message to explain the situation, rather than the unclear comment left by Magog the Ogre. Anomie⚔ 03:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit protected request
Talk:Lord Emsworth and the Girl Friend

message: I was under the impression that one of our zillions of guidelines was that dates were to be listed chronologically. I may be mistaken, or the guideline may have changed, but it seems more logical that the UK edition's publication date (1926) should be mentioned before the US edition's (1928). I'm altering it for now to chronological ordering.--Philologia (talk) 13:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological date listing?