Talk:Philadelphia Flyers

message: This section (and it's subsections) have been changed to pros style (again), as called for by consensus at Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Ice Hockey/Team pages format. Any continous attempts to revert the section to a list style (against WikiProject's guidelines) could be seen as vandalism. GoodDay 19:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Honored Members

message: I am aware that the Devils bought the Titans and changed the name, but I am not sure that the Flyers have terminated their affiliation with them, yet. Do any links exist which might prove the affiliation agreement has been terminated? --207.69.140.25 20:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to remember though that the affiliation system in hockey, especially in the levels below the AHL, aren't like that of what you see in baseball. While many of the teams do have affiliate relationships  to a NHL club, not all do, in the ECHL their not as exclusive as the affiliate relationships are in baseball, also considering that some ECHL teams are affiliated to more then one NHL team, for example the  Florida Everblades are affiliated with the Carolina Hurricanes and Florida Panthers on the NHL level but are only affiliated to the Albany River Rats on the AHL level. As for you question, based on the information on the ECHL, it would lead me to believe, also based on the press releases by Trenton and NJ, that the Flyers no longer have a relationship with the Trenton club and are w/o an ECHL affiliate. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 23:41, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do believe the "Devils" are specifically a NJ Devils affiliate only, otherwise they would have kept an ambiguous name, like Titans.Darthflyer 03:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any mention of an affiliation on the websites of the Flyers, the Phantoms, The Trenton Devils, or the ECHL. ccwaters 19:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I disagree, and I'll use something from the ECHL website as a source. It lists the ECHL teams and their NHL and AHL affiliates as of May 22nd, 2007 and the Flyers aren't on the list at all. BsroiaadnTalk 21:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Trenton Devils]]

message: I made a couple changes to this page in the past day, most notably the expansion of the Franchise history. There are certain places I should have trimmed down a little more so as to not make the History of the Philadelphia Flyers article irrelevant (though if articles are created for every single Flyers season like 2006-07, that is something that may come to pass).
I have pretty much stuck to the Devils page format but I do wonder about the Franchise records section. Perhaps some of those records could be tacked onto the Philadelphia Flyers seasons article? If we are to have such a section, the only records worth noting are the franchise career marks, in my opinion. I guess it largely depends on the rationale for the inclusion of records when the Devils article received FA-status, which I am unaware of.
I think the effort should be made to get this article FA-status since it doesn't seem that far away as it is (sourcing being the major deterrent to those chances). I am not sure how to go about this, however. --207.69.140.25 20:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I personally can't stand the Flyers, I'd help with this if we can get it started. The Flyers (although I hate to admit it), have a very interesting history full of major accomplishments as well as tragedy (the goalie who died while drunk driving...I can't think of his name at the moment). BsroiaadnTalk 03:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be Pelle Lindbergh (1959-1985). GoodDay 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement 

message: More Jersey pictures needed in the appropriate section; specifically current uniform pictures. Love each other, or perish. ~Auden 04:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics

message: Is there some kind of source for this claim? --4.239.168.139 18:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What team has the best all time win percentage in the NHL? I checked to make sure the win percentage of .576 is correct and it is. --72.25.23.15 (talk) 06:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Philadelphia Flyers have the second best winning percentage in the NHL behind the Montreal Canadiens." 

message: Is this section really necessary? Since the media outlets are already listed in the infobox it doesn't add much of anything to the article. --4.239.168.25 20:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio and television 

message: :Image:Parenttime.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the rationales, go ahead and review. Alaney2k (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Parenttime.jpg

message: Is anyone interested in joining the Flyers task force? --Flyer47 (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Philadelphia Flyers task force|Philadelphia Flyers task force]] 

message: The image :Image:Katestatue.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Katestatue.jpg

message: What is shown in the article right now is not correct.  The Flyers did not wear Cooperalls for two seasons.
While they wore long pants for 1981/82 and 1982/83, at least in 1982/83 they wore a long-pant product from CCM, and their equipment may have been CCM products in 1981/82.  Cooperalls were made by a different company, Cooper.
Michael Poplawski (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooperalls 

message: In one of the Simpsons episode's, the Philadelphia Flyers team of 1976 appears. And they are portrayed in an evil manner. Why is that? What was so "evil" or "bad" about the team of 1976? Or was it just a joke?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.200.190 (talk) 19:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Flyers in the 70's were known as the Broadstreet Bullies. The reason for this was that they fought alot more than most teams and often used dirty playing tactics. (atleast thats what non-flyers fans will say. flyer fans will probably think they did no wrong lol.) -Djsasso (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpsons 

message: Sorry to have to do an edit, on the Philadelphia Flyers page, but...under the "Broad Street Bullies" section, when the topic of their games against the Red Army comes about, there was a BIG error.   I changed "Wachovia arena" to "Spectrum" since that is what the arena they played in was known as.
How do I know this?  I spent the better part of my childhood (8 to 18) with season tickets to the Flyers games at the Spectrum.  It wasn't until the new arena was built (originally the "CoreStates Center") that Wachovia became involved.  
I made this edit for all hockey fans, Flyers fans specifically.
Any issues, my email is pridewalker666@hotmail.com.
Respect to the original poster, but the Spectrum is not the FU center.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.196.11 (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New user, found a GLARING problem 

message: WOO! Flyers make history as being the 6th team (I think) to come back from a 0-3 defeceit in a 7-game series and win. I can personally stand the flyers. I'm not sure if this should be listed here because it is already listed at this page
Sorry if I'm being too enthusiastic for Wikipedia.
69.136.72.16 (talk) 01:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  flyers make history 

message: In the list of conference championships, 1976-77 is listed. The Flyers lost that year in the conference finals to Boston.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pressman (talk • contribs) 04:45, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Conference championships went to the regular season champs from  '74 to '81. --24.152.220.10 (talk) 06:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Info

message: The Flyers consider themselves division champions 15 times. That includes 1982–83 and 1985–86 and doesn't include 1988–89. See the Flyers 2010–11 Media Guide, p298. I'm aware there are some teams who go by the playoff champion and I think at least one has banners for both (Pittsburgh?). But the Flyers go by the regular season champion and it should remain as such in this and other Flyers articles. --Izzygood (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, we have a bit of a discussion regarding this ongoing at WT:HOCKEY.  There is question as to who, exactly, won those divisions between 1982 and 1993. Resolute 20:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Perhaps the 2010-11 book is making an error in retroactive info. Re-starting with the 1993-94 season, all division titles are of the regular season. But from 1981-82 to 1992-93, playoff division titles were apart of the picture, along with regular season titles. GoodDay (talk) 00:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless they switched the banners and helped the Capitals lift this one up to the rafters. The Islanders also appear to go by regular season titles. The last one to the right in the picture, 1987–88, is shared by the Devils, who at least have it as "Patrick Division Playoff Champions". The Canucks have banners for both regular season and playoff division titles without distinguishing between the two. There just doesn't seem to be an official league-wide standard for who was the "true" division champion for that time period and to enforce one standard across Wikipedia when the NHL didn't bother to seems wrong to me. --Izzygood (talk) 04:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My idea was best, as it designated which were playoff & which were both. GoodDay (talk) 13:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps with a note that the Flyers only have banners for the regular season titles? --Izzygood (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I used an asterisk next to '84-85, '86-87 & '88-89 & explained that the NHL recognized Divison playoff champs from 1981-82 to 1992-93. GoodDay (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

text: The NHL media guides from that time period only recognize the playoff version as the division champions. The teams themselves as is noted vary on what they acknowledge, but really that comes down to just trying to promote their own product. But the official NHL guides have been recognizing the playoff version as the division champions. Banners are really up to the individual teams as there are no league rules on what you can put up a banner for or not. And individual media guides are also created by the individual teams so can probably also be chalked up to trying to promote their own product. Really its only what the league considers the division champion that matters. -DJSasso (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We're currently not showing all the division playoff champions, on all the team articles though. Here (for example), the Flyers were 1989 Divison playoff champions -yet we're not showing that-. GoodDay (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I would like some proof regarding these NHL media guides from the 1980s since these things should be cited and not merely assumed. Do the modern media guides differ? Do they list both regular season and playoff champions? --Izzygood (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division titles 

message: I think erased would make more sense.
:"Erased" is not the appropriate term for a sports loss in an encyclopedia.  Wikipedia is not ESPN, or a Sports blog, using colorful language. Please read the guidelines that other editors have been posting on your talk page that you have been deleting. They will help you understand what Wikipedia is and what it is for, so that you can start making valuable contributions to it. Echoedmyron (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the problem with the word Erased?! 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ed Snyder.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I edited the text regarding the goal that Flyers goalie Doug Favell gave up against Buffalo's Gerry Meehan in 1972.  The distance Meehan was from the Flyer's goal was greatly exaggerated in the text and in NHL folklore over the years.   I have seen the goal on YouTube and it was from inside the blue line, not at center ice or 80 feet out as written here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helmut Hedd (talk • contribs) 05:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Favell gives up goal from 80' feet out 

message: So does anyone know why retired numbers are not displayed in the navbox like they are in other leagues? If there is no "rule" against it, then should we add them? Peetlesnumber1 (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the purpose of a navbox is to aid navigation of key articles around a topic, not to stuff every link with a tangental relationship to a topic into one big mess of a template.  Doubly so since the format other league projects use to note retired numbers are easter eggs of no value to a reader. Same reason why I, and many WP:HOCKEY members oppose the silly links to championship or near-championship seasons.  There are core articles on the Flyers that will lead a reader to this information in a more organized way.  Most notably, Philadelphia Flyers itself. Resolute 23:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yep.  As with many other pieces of information that people want to stuff into leads, templates or infoboxes, I have a bit of advice for those interested in a hockey team's retired numbers: read the article.   Ravenswing   02:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retired numbers 

message: please fix hextall as he was fired and the Fletcher era has begun 170.184.81.41 (talk) 02:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 03:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got it.  They were referring to the section title of "The Hextall era", which is obviously ended since Hextall was fired.  This is why I personally hate naming sections after people, POV concerns notwithstanding. Resolute 14:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2018 

message: Pathockey14 (talk) 17:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  18:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2021 

message: Why is it that for the 1973-74 season, when the Flyers won their first cup, that it does not say we won a Conference Final? Also, for the 1976-77 season, it says we won a conference final but we did not appear in the Stanley Cup Final. I had edited that, in what I thought was fixing it, but not long after, it was reversed. Could someone explain why these two, mentioned above, should not be edited out? LegioV (talk) 02:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There were no Conference Finals, until the 1981-82 season. From 1974-75 to 1980-81 season, the team that finished in first place in each Conference during the regular season, were designated Conference champions. GoodDay (talk) 04:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conference Finals 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Flyers Skate Zone and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 11#Flyers Skate Zone until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 19:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Flyers Skate Zone" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The Flyers general manager is Fletcher, not Briere. Why does someone fix it all the time? Galaxoid (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah. I saw today's news. Galaxoid (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Manager is Chuck Fletcher