lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Puzzle de Pon!

message: Anyone else think that a note should be added at the top outlining that the game should not be confused with the similarly-named Panel de Pon? I'm just not sure how it works; not to entirely familiar with Wiki yet.--REALiTY 06:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Puzzle De Pon ≠ Panel De Pon
Talk:Judith Ridley

message: There was a redirect from Judith Riley to Judith Ridley, but no indication on this page as to why this should be. I've redirected it to Judith Merkle Riley.  If there's a valid reason to redirect to this page, there needs to be a "redirect" hatnote on one page or the other. PamD (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riley?
Talk:Abdulrahim Kerimbakiev

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 12:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]

message: In a recent edit a contributor removed a large amount of material with the misleading edit summary "ISN correction".  
I don't believe there is any consensus to support the large excision they made.  Personally, I disagree with it.  And I think it is the kind of edit that should have followed a discussion.  So I reverted it.  Geo Swan (talk) 07:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: explanation
Talk:Abid Raza

message: I reverted a bunch of revisions which included a massive unlinking a valid links.  Geo Swan (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a look at the page history and think there is no reason to revert so many edits at once. Many of them are snall, clear and clearly explained in the edit history. Just to name one example: You reverted the category that he has been release back to that he is still held in Guantanamo. He has been released in 2004! I did updates and other well defined edits. Please try to improve the article from this stage. And bring particular points to the talk page. IQinn (talk) 21:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation
Talk:Judson Scott

message: The second paragraph contains "Not only did he get a featured role in the best Star Trek movie ever...", which is clear opinion. I believe this should be removed to keep the article unbiased.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eezip (talk • contribs) 19:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion in "Star Trek roles" section 
Talk:Adel al-Gazzar

message: I reverted a recent edit  as per this discussion.  Geo Swan (talk) 06:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: revert  -- see talk
Talk:Judy Henske

message: I count two Elektra albums.  What was the third?  I will change it for now. Sojambi Pinola (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right - changed three to two. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Elektra Albums

message: I thought I heard that Judy had a daughter. Is that true? What is her name and is she in the business?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.106.111 (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is - as shown on the cover of Farewell Aldebaran in 1968.  She is now Kate DeLaPointe, she was one half of a duo called Wayward Maggie, and her website is here.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Daughter?
Talk:Amos T. Akerman

message: The website http://www.sallysfamilyplace.com/Schools/elmgrove.htm#Elm%20Grove%20ca%201860 indicates Ackerman ran a boy's school in Murfreesboro, NC...not Tennesee as stated in the Wiki article. Quote from the website:
:"1843 -- The Academy at Murfreesboro was under the control of A T Ackerman, a young man from New England, who subsequently removed to Georgia and rose to distinction. Having become prominent as a lawyer he was a Confederate officer; and afterwards Attorney General of the United States under Grant.
:"The male academy in Murfreesboro had been conducted by William H Manning, since of Gates. Hertford never gained or lost a better citizen than Mr. Manning, who still survives [1878] in undiminished usefulness. Edward Carter was his successor."
....Gates and Hertford refer to counties in the extreme eastern NC. Murfreesboro NC is located near there. Engr105th (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having no replies in response to my post above, I've changed the article to reflect that he taught in Murfreesboro NC, rather than Murfreesboro TN. Engr105th (talk) 05:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ackerman as an educator 

message: I believe this article needs improvement in terms of structure and additional content. Cmguy777 (talk) 04:40, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been making improvements to the article to fit Wikipedia's format. I plan on using McFeely as a reference in the article. The article is currently in a transition phase. Cmguy777 (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: "At age 22, he joined the Confederate States Army in the spring of 1864"? Not only is the sentence worded a little awkwardly, but Akerman was born in 1821, meaning he turned 22 in 1843! What Seems To Be The Officer, Problem (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age? 

message: I the do the wonder what the the or the is the there for, the why, the maybe not, inclement reign.
Dhsert (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Having made your point here, you could have just fixed the sentence. Ken Gallager (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lower court had ruled that if the Clement could prove that White was a black man, he could not hold office.
Talk:Adil al-Nusayri

message: Someone put this guy in the category :Category:Saudi Arabian terrorists.  I have removed him.  There are no references to support inclusion in this category in the article.
I have no objection to adding him, or any other Saudi, to this category, provided there are references to substantiate it.  But, I believe, it is against policy to add articles to categories when the relationship between article and category can't be determined from the text of the article.
Cheers!  Geo Swan 14:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for my mistakes , i was just trying to sort the Root category of Saudi Arabian People by occupation. i couldnt find a better category for guantanamo prisoners but this one. Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 15:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: fix category -- see talk

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names

message: Someone placed an NPOV tag on this article.  Those tags tell readers to look to the talk page for an explanation of the tag.  Whoever placed it did not do so in this particular case.  If no one is prepared to explain the tag, I believe it should be removed.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Adnan Muhammed Ali Al Saigh

message: What is the source for the name that is used now? After carefully evaluating the sources in the article and multiple secondary sources from search results. I plan to move the article to Adnan Mohammed Ali. Any objection? IQinn (talk) 12:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In this suggested rename you have asserted that you have "carefully evaluated" multiple secondary sources from search results.  Please start "showing your work".  Please stop claiming you have reviewed multiple secondary sources without stating what those sources are, and linking to them. There is an overhead for renaming articles, and it should only be done for good reasons.  Geo Swan (talk) 06:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not be offended as the creator of the page. You may have overlooked the question at the beginning of my post. Could you please provide us with the sources for this name? IQinn (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: move
Talk:Ahmed Adil

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names
Talk:Julia Davis

message: Julia`s writing a new comedy show sky atlantic aswell mind.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.109.243.18 (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced. 

message: C.V. at https://www.independenttalent.com/actors/julia-davis/ lists credits.
69.181.23.220 (talk) 02:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs '''Radio''' table 

message: What does the L stand for? Her FreeBMD entry here does not say. Likewise her entry at Companies House: here Martinevans123 (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Have updated FreeBMD link. Mother's name Henstridge. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

text: This source in The Guardian says "Born in Bath in 1966, she studied drama at York University...". Martinevans123 (talk) 08:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name 

message: The entire article needs sorting out  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A04:4A43:4D7E:7F2B:6C36:252E:D0A6:4861 (talk) 01:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italics on everything
Talk:Selver Hodžić

message: He was dropped from website since May 2007. Matthew_hk tc 13:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current club
Talk:Senijad Ibričić

message: Seriously, half this article's writing needs to go ASAP. Whilst things like "fastest player in the league" can perhaps be referenced, things like "skillful winger", etc can't be. If you really wish to use such language please find a reputable journalist locally or internationally who has said this and edit the article as such, e.g. "so and so said 'this player is awesome'" or something. --Phill talk Edits Review this GA review! 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Sergei Gorlukovich

message: "The Russian footballer, Sergei Gorlukovic, received the fastest yellow card  in any World Cup match (along with Giampiero Marin of Italy) - within the 1st minute - he received the card in the 1994 World Cup against Sweden." Can somebody source this properly for me as I think it should be included on the page, it may need to be wrote more clearly too. - Clare 23:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact needs to be sourced
Talk:Street Fighter: The Movie (arcade game)

message: Although, the arcade version shares its name with the home versions, they're not really identical games. Jonny2x4 05:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article's intro is completely misleading. 

message: This is some talk on forum with one of the developers;
* http://forums.shoryuken.com/showthread.php?s=9a561e781134318951a1221bbb05e566&t=125411 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frap (talk • contribs) 10:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk with developer 

message: This article reads part-article, part-game guide. This should be fixed, and many sections should be outright deleted. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 14:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The game is named Street Fighter: The Movie, the film is titled Street Fighter. The film's page is Street Fighter (film), so there shouldn't be a problem JohnnyMrNinja
*Oppose "Street Fighter: The Movie" should be a redirect to the first Street Fighter movie. TJ Spyke 02:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Do you mean Street Fighter II: The Animated Movie? Anyway, I think the parenthetical is helpful here. Dekimasuよ! 05:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I think there should be two sections to this article. One covering the arcade game and the other home version. Jonny2x4 (talk) 18:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two sections 

message: I still considering splitting the article into two, seeing how Street Fighter: The Movie game released on home consoles is nothing like the arcade version. Hell, even All About Capcom Head-to-Head Fighting Games consider them to be separate games, listing Real Battle on Film (the PS/Saturn version in Japan) in the "Consumer Originals" section of the book. Jonny2x4 (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split
Talk:Al Silm Haji Hajjaj Awwad Al Hajjaji

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 05:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: disputed picture

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 04:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names
Talk:Ali Abdul Motalib Awayd Hassan Al Tayeea

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 04:08, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 04:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names 

message: I gave it a no on supporting info as the images are pretty generic images that are on the pages of every Gitmo detainee rather than anything specific to this person. I was going to do an info box for him, but with no image and very little information about his history, it would look sort of sad hanging out all empty. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 22:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MilHist B Class Assessment
Talk:Ali Yahya Mahdi Al Raimi

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 14:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket. It is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Ali Yahya Mahdi Al Raimi. IQinn (talk) 08:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 

message: This article is one of a series that had a number of valid and useful wikilinks removed with an edit summary "unlink interpretation of questionable source".
I don't think this is a sufficient explanation, and I don't think this removal of wikilinks was a good idea.
I think the wikilinks should be restored to this article and the other articles.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Already explained and under discussion hhere and in a related discussion here. I have told you that and i have ask you multiple times in a friendly way to continue the discussions and to answer my questions. here and here and on other places. I think your behavior is disruptive. I would appreciate if you could answer the questions and continue started discussions. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 08:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of valid and useful wikilinks 

message: His DAB refers to a brother, and mentor, who is claimed to have been a physical fitness instructor at the Al Farouq camp and a Taliban camp.  I am going to record all the names for this brother I can find:
# Qasim Yahya Mahdi Abd Al-Rimi
# Qassem Yahya Mahdi Al Reemi
# Abu Hurayrah
# Doctor Hurayrah
# Abu Hajer
Geo Swan (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Brother
Talk:Aminullah (Guantanamo detainee 848)

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 08:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I suggest to move the page to Amin Ullah as per secondary sources. NYT's, Andy Worthington and others. Any objections? IQinn (talk) 11:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: move
Talk:Sergei Ovchinnikov (footballer, born 1970)

message: This is not the dead Ovchinnikov!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.130.194.181 (talk) 13:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amir Yakoub al-Amir Mahmoud

message: The questionable Guantanamo documents of Amir Yakoub al-Amir Mahmoud' Combatant Status Review Tribunal and Administrative Review Board are are 18 pages long. How do we choose which parts to include into this BLP? IQinn (talk) 05:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Same way we decide which parts of a newspaper article to include? Using all the facts that to shed light on the person? Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  17:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You think we can compare these documents with newspaper articles or how would you describe their nature? And how would you choose these "facts" from a collection of 18 pages  without misinterpreting them? The ARB has for example three rounds and the round that we do not include could present a very different picture. IQinn (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Include all sources, list all facts. Cite them to their sources. The usual procedure, as far as I can tell. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  03:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So you think we should include all 18 pages into the article? If not, how would you choose these "facts" from a collection of 18 pages  without misinterpreting them? The ARB has for example three rounds and the round that we do not include could present a very different picture. IQinn (talk) 03:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation of sources 

message: My last edit has been reverted. I would like to discuss this here. Let me first further explain the reasoning behind this edit. 
Prior to this edit i have clarified all parts in the article that are direct quotes from the transcipts of the Tribunals by putting them inside the {quotation} template.
When i came to the Testimony section i noticed that this part was not a quote but a short summary and interpretation of the testimony most likely produced by the WP editor himself. It is very biased and in my view a misinterpretation of this part.
That's the summary and interpretation (Link to same section in the article) 
Compare that to the original five pages that have been reframed under "Testimony".
Page one: Summarized Unsworn Detainee Statement
Page two: Summarized Unsworn Detainee Statement
Page three: Tribunal member questions
Page four: Tribunal member questions
Page five: Tribunal member questions / Tribunal president question
Get the point? Summaries and interpretation of these documents are not to do by WP editors because they can lead to misinterpretations as i have shown here. I do not doubt the good intention of the editor who put this on the page but it is (lets phrase it nicely) not encyclopedic.
I would like to ask the editor who reverted me if he now could agree with my reasoning and my wish to remove it again. Or if there is anybody else who disagrees with the removal? Or if there are more questions and things to discuss what i am willingly to do. IQinn (talk) 03:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary and interpretation of the "Testimony" part of the CSRT
Talk:Ultra Vortek

message: It's all well and good telling a gigantic storyline to everyone. But it lacks any substance if someone, such as me for example, who has never heard of it does not know how it works. What is the gameplay actually like? Does it contain any features to make it stand out from the crowd? What was the critical reception like. Without this information, this is not an encyclopedia entry but rather a story. Madslocodemente 02:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay?
Talk:Warhammer: Shadow of the Horned Rat

message: This game, being single player, requires information regarding the plot of its story. There is no mention of it at all. In addition, there needs to be a better explanation on the gameplay, as it does not seem to be very good at the moment.GUtt01 (talk) 07:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article requires Plot and other work on it
Talk:Waterworld (video game)

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abryn (talk • contribs) 
* Here are a bunch I had saved from 2017:
* http://www.nintendolife.com/reviews/2009/06/waterworld_retro
* https://web.archive.org/web/20141115050043/http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=8113&tab=review
* dev http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2010/03/feature_the_making_of_the_nintendo_virtual_boy, originally published in Retro Gamer #64, pp. 56–
* GamePro #82, May 1996, p. 70
* Nintendo Power #78, November 1995, p. 101, and two-page overview on pp. 78–79
* N64 Magazine #21, November 1998 "Retroworld"
* retrospective Retro Gamer #109, p. 19
* cover http://www.planetvb.com/modules/games/?r022ibu
: (not watching, please ) czar 23:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Widget Workshop

message: Being a Maxis game, shouldn't it show up in and have the "List Of Maxis Games" toolbar?
* I agree. My family actually purchased this game as part of a set which included other games such as [SimTown], [SimAnt], [SimTunes], etc. Pottersson (talk) 22:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled