lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Five Finger Death Punch

message: I have to say how much respect I have for him first. Ok, so how do we know this and where is it confirmed? We'll need some citations until it has become common knowledge or delete it as I haven't found any information supporting this addition. I hope it's true though. NebulaGRLLZ (talk) 11:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Janne Wirman?? 

message: Chris has been playing in FFDP since 2010 and is well-known in the metal community. Why he still has not got his own page? ArtemAlexanderson (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You're more than welcome to create one! Assuming that the individual meets WP:BIO, feel free to start a draft at Draft: Chris Kael. If you have any questions or need any assistance, let me know! Skipple ☎ 14:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Kael 
Talk:Folkearth

message: ==Rewrite/rethink needed?==
I've been thinking about this article (and listening to Folkearth!) a fair bit lately. It seems to me that it's not so much a "band" as an ongoing collaborative project involving musicians from various bands. They don't tour together; I doubt they even get everybody together to record at the same time. There might even be band "members" who've never met each other. Okay, so this raises the question: Who's the motive force behind the project? Who had "the idea" that the article now refers to to have these different artists collaborate in this way? Who organizes the collaborations? Where is it all mixed together? Unless I'm totally off-base (which I might be), it seems that the article would require a substantial rewrite to answer these questions and make the situation clear. Q·L·1968 ☿ 18:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I've been thinking about this article (and listening to Folkearth!) a fair bit lately. It seems to me that it's not so much a "band" as an ongoing collaborative project involving musicians from various bands. They don't tour together; I doubt they even get everybody together to record at the same time. There might even be band "members" who've never met each other. Okay, so this raises the question: Who's the motive force behind the project? Who had "the idea" that the article now refers to to have these different artists collaborate in this way? Who organizes the collaborations? Where is it all mixed together? Unless I'm totally off-base (which I might be), it seems that the article would require a substantial rewrite to answer these questions and make the situation clear. Q·L·1968 ☿ 18:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite/rethink needed?
Talk:Airboat

message: Why is there a link to a boat cover company in the external links section? Do Airboats need covers more than conventional boats, or is it just advertising?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.121.247.173 (talk) 23:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just advertising. I've removed it. Recury (talk) 14:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boat covers? 

message: The following sentence is disputed: "Importation to European Union is difficult due to the high cost of the CE mark test, which all new and imported used boats need from outside the EU."
Not only does this appear to be irrelevant to the topic of safety, but its factual accuracy is disputed. CE Marking within the EU is required for equipment either imported into, or manufactured within, the EU.  The commonly held belief by uninformed commentators in the US, that CE Marking is a differential cost to importers, is incorrect.  The cost of CE Marking is borne by all companies marketing relevant equipment in the EU, including EU companies, and is ultimately paid for by the end user wherever the equipment originates.
I suggest that this sentence is removed, unless there are well founded objections. Billysugger (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety and CE Marking 

message: It would seem that seaplane is a general term, and that floatplanes and flying boats are types of seaplanes. If so, then perhaps this footnote might need rewriting. ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 06:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seaplanes, floatplanes and flying boats
Talk:Sproing Award

message: A bit in doubt how best to translate the quite central word "serier". The slightly informal tone of Sproing's beste serier could go with "strips" (as I think it is now unless I didn't catch myself changing it) but "series" could work I suppose, but no.. "Cartoon" would just be wrong, as would "comic strip", "comic book", and "comics" doesn't fit. Any ideas? MURGH disc. 23:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand what's wrong with comic(s)? 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comic implies a stand-up comedian or the British term for a magazine assembling several comic strips, both fairly imprecise. As I described above, the normal term "tegneserier" (comic strips) has been reduced to the informal word "serier" (ie 'strips), therefore I used that. MURGH disc. 22:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, not according to the bokmål article, which uses "tegneserier". 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 11:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Serier" dilemma
Talk:Sharpe's Challenge

message: The metadata on the main article page says:
No. of episodes 	2
Preceded by 	Sharpe's Waterloo
Followed by 	Sharpe's Peril
If there is one predecessor ("Sharpe's Waterloo") and one successor ("Sharpe's Peril" to the present article ("Sharpe's Challenge"), it seems to me that means there are 3 episodes, not 2.  173.52.0.127 (talk) 11:23, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many programs are there in the series? 

message: In the introduction it states "contrary to most parts of the TV series, Sharpe's Challenge, as well as the follow-up Sharpe's Peril, isn't based entirely on one of Cornwell's novels, but it uses and adapts some characters and story-lines from Sharpe's Tiger." This statement is unhelpful on two counts. Firstly, as is made clear several times elsewhere in this article, events in these episodes are adapted from all three of the Sharpe Novels that are set in India, albeit generally time shifted. However the opening segment of the story, set in 1803, is directly adapted from Sharpe's Triumph and is arguably as close to the relevant part of that book as any of the other ITV Sharpe adaptations are to the novels that they are based. It is also the case that as noted elsewhere in the article, the main villain here, Dodd, did not feature in Tiger, but was in Triumph and Sharpe's Fortress. As well as this not all of the earlier ITV Sharpe films had been "based entirely on one of Bernard Cornwell's novels". Two were not based on anything written by Cornwell (Sharpe's Mission and Sharpe's Justice, and while some are reasonably faithful to the novels that they are based on, several are significantly different (eg the TV version of Sharpe's Gold has almost no relation to the novel of the same name other than some early scenes). Thus, I think this statement should be altered, or possibly removed entirely. Dunarc (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction -unhelpful statement
Talk:Ablution in Christianity

message: I edited the section that has to do with reserving the Eucharist in the Eastern Church, but then took the following paragraphs out, because they didn't seem relevant to the article:
"The Eucharist is not reserved in the same manner as in the Western (Roman Catholic) Church, for the purpose of adoration. Orthodox always reserve both the Body and the Blood of Christ. To accomplish this, a portion of the Blood of Christ is poured over the Lamb (Host) that is to be reserved. It is then cut into small portions, dried and placed in the Tabernacle.
"Eastern Theology frowns upon receiving the Eucharist outside of the Divine Liturgy (or Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts) except for the ill, infirm, or homebound. The Eastern Church views the Eucharist as medicinal for the body and soul and only useful to the faithful if consumed." MishaPan 23:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eastern
Talk:Charles Paul (composer)

message: I've tagged this article for inappropriate tone as a "catch-all" of sorts for the issues within the article. It is not written in a neutral tone and there appears to be a lot of original research as well. The article is laden with WP:PUFFERY and peacock words and phrasing and will likely need a complete rewrite to be policy compliant. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate tone
Talk:Wheaton Academy

message: Do you think that the references tag can be removed? I added more citations and took away some uncitable material. Muffin of the English (talk) 21:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Fonseca (singer)

message: This article requires a number of improvements to bring it up to date.  Specifically:
1.  The writing needs to be brought to a professional standard, including grammar and spelling errors.
2.  A section on the artist's social activism through music needs to be added.
3.  A reorganization of the article would help with the flow of information.  For example, information about the artist's formative years could be placed earlier in the article to highlight how those years shaped both his music and his social activism.
Are there further edits that the community feels would be useful additions to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjlmiv65 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: https://www.sheetmusicdirect.com/de-DE/se/ID_No/862388/Product.aspx 2001:9E8:1886:200:84B1:A759:1FAC:B00F (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  complete name: Juan Fernando Fonseca Carrera
Talk:Brain coral

message: I don't want to accuse anybody of copy/paste plagiarism. However, some of the content in this article is substantially identical to material on the Monterey Bay Aquarium's website. I can't tell which came first, but (for instance) the statement, found in both sources, that the coral relies on "brawn"--a beautifully apt and descriptive word choice--must be the product of its author's particular fancy, and unlikely to appear in two independently written articles. Rangergordon (talk) 10:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Write through desireable? 

message: The current lead (along with the rest of the text) is wrong:
:Brain coral is a common name given to corals in the family Mussidae, so called due to their generally spheroid shape and grooved surface which resembles a brain. [...] one of the most common genera, Favia, [...] The genus and species have not been defined through the scientific classification segment.
Previously, this was the article for "Faviidae", but (since some iconic faviids are typified by meanderoid submassive morphology which somewhat resembles the gyri and sulci of the human neocortex) used an informal common nickname "brain coral" for the title. Recently, most of the former faviids (including Favites and the iconic "brain corals" like Goniastrea and Platygyra) have been reclassified into the pre-existing family Merulinidae (which already included at least a couple species with meanderoid morphology). However, the type-genus Favia (which didn't have meanderoid morphology anyway although at present it is accompanied still by e.g. Diploria labyrinthiformis) has been reclassified into a new subfamily ("Faviinae") of Mussidae (a family that was traditionally known for fleshy large-polyp corals).
Hence, recently Cwmhiraeth has naively replaced "Faviidae" with "Mussidae" in the text, resulting in paragraphs of nonsense. The common name "brain coral" is really not applicable to the family Mussidae (nor was it ever wholly applicable to Faviidae, and Merulinidae is not much better), Favia is not currently considered part of the same family as the (sic) "brain corals", and the genera list is totally wrong. Either get rid of this article entirely (letting it be replaced with ones that better follow the current taxonomy, such as Mussidae, Merulinidae and possibly Faviina) or make it about corals with a meanderoid morphology (not a taxonomic clade). 
Cesiumfrog (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, having become aware that Faviidae was no longer acceptable and was considered a synonym of Mussidae, I did go about changing it in many articles. I am sorry if I have inadvertently introduced errors. Personally I would not choose to have an article called "Brain coral". It is difficult for Wikipedia to keep up and deal with changes in taxonomy. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faviidae vs Mussidae
Talk:International rule (sailing)

message: I just wonder why 4mR is no meter class : http://www.15m2-sns-class.ch/?page_id=27 if you compare to the rule of 8mR rule there is no big difference. Of course 4mR - 15m2 SNS is only on the swiss lakes active class with a big history - 1st boat build 1933. Most of the boat have smaller sail aera than 15m2 - you don't need a sailing licence to navigate with such a boat on swiss waters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1210:822A:5100:5586:98CF:9060:B3CD (talk) 05:13, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

message: * Re. merge suggestion - these two pages are both on the same topic. they should be merged and then need some clean up. Dan-cfn 23:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to merge [[The International Rule]] into [[International Rule (sailing)]]

message: Three (measurement) rules are listed, the latest: "Third International rule, Used from 1933–1939.". Which rule is used since then (and for instance also for the America's Cup in the 1970ies)?
2001:7F0:400C:0:0:0:0:5 (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Rule? 

message: Does the 4 meter class actually exist as something that can be verified with a credible sources? I've been searching for any information about it, but there doesn't seem to be anything outside of the linked Swiss website that mentions "15m2 SNS – 4mR" in the title, but if you'll go into the actual boats - they actually use "15" designation. It did not appear on any of the olympics, there are no books where it would be described (aside from a few mentions of a "4 meter class" that do not appear to directly refer to the International rule)... I am removing it from the article until a credibly sourced description of the class can be found. SkywalkerPL (talk) 13:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  4mR 

message: Is the coefficient of G one-half, as it says in this article, or one-third, as it says in 7 Metre?  Got any good sources?  Dicklyon (talk) 04:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Internation Rule?
Talk:Chrysler PowerFlite transmission

message: This article is somewhat misleading.  While it is true that Chrysler was the last of the Big Three to offer a FULLY automatic transmission, it DID offer a semi-automatic transmission (usually called "Fluid Drive" even though its numerous versions and modifications had individual names) through the 1940's and into the early 1950's.
Powerflite became available on ALL Chryslers late in the 1953 model year, not just on Imperials.
RogerInPDX 14 March 2007
I have added some information about gear selector patterns and Chrysler's reasoning behind them.  I have also discussed the fact that PowerFlite did not have a "Park" range.
RogerInPDX 06:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The deleted portion was especially egregious, as Chrysler did not "pioneer" in "the field" of automatic transmissions, quite the contrary, by the time the PowerFlite was introduced it was well behind the pack. The factory manual for the ZIL contains some very detailed blueprints and descriptions of the ZIL automatic transmission, it may be interesting to compare it the to the original Chrysler design. To me, the functional parts (planetary gear sets, clutches, oil pump, etc.) look superficially similar, but the analysis should be made by someone who is more of an expert on this subject, not me. 85.140.1.19 (talk) 22:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Talk:The Listening (band)

message: I submit that The Listening is a distinct group from the Rock N Roll Worship Circus, not merely a continuation.  While the RRWC did not "break up" for The Listening to emerge, stylistically and in terms of band members The Listening is very different from the RRWC.  The Listening do not bill themselves as RRWC and have not for over four years now, even if that history is part of the band.  It is incorrect to attribute the albums "The Listening LP" and "Transmission 1" to RRWC. Ryanro (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Listening
Talk:NMOS logic

message: should i extend this to cover PMOS as well (and rename it as such), since the two are essentially a mirror image of each other it would seem like a good fit to describe them together. Plugwash 23:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My feeling is that they can stay separate. PMOS logic was used earlier, and then pretty much superseded by NMOS. I suspect that, and other changes along the way, is enough reason for a separate discussion.  Gah4 (talk) 18:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

message: For another page discussing an NMOS chip, there is disagreement on transistor count.  As I don't know anyplace else to ask, is it usual when counting transistors in NMOS logic to include the depletion mode transistors that are actually used as resistors? Gah4 (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transistor count
Category talk:United States statutory interpretation case law

message: I felt it was necessary to create this category for several reasons.  One is the self-evident importance of the topic.  Another is that other categories were acting as (very poor) proxies for this category.  So, for example, in cases having to do with implied causes of action, the Civ Pro category was used instead of this one.  While Civ Pro makes a kind of sense (if there's no cause of action, the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a cause of action under R. 12(b)(6)), it was also highly inadequate.  There were other reasons, too, but I figure I've sufficiently bored anyone who's read through this comment.  Hydriotaphia 00:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pasaje Del Terror

message: Who created this page? There's a lot of stuff on here that is wrong! Someone didn't do their research!
This reads like an advert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.47.49.25 (talk) 00:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Research or an advert?

message: I saw a Pasaje del Teror in Picadilly Circus today.  Anyone have any information? --TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:03, 16 June 2009
I've added a sentence about the London Version. I can't give a good description about it since I haven't visited the attraction and it is now closed down. -- 90.192.98.186 (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: London
Talk:Highway Song

message: Originally, "Highway Song" was a big hit for the band Blackfoot, which was around long before System of a Down was even created, and obviously became a hit for the band Blackfoot before it was a hit for SOAD. In this case, should this article remain titled the same? It wasn't actually a released single for SOAD but was one of Blackfoot's most notable hits, and appears on many lists as one of the greatest southern rock songs of all time (just search in any search engine for that last phrase). So, what should be done? Zchris87v 06:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Blackfoot (band)|Blackfoot]] song
Talk:Organic farming methods

message: I added some notes about variance of the pratices mentioned in this article and the USDA required pratices. Also, I added some ref tags. Pdbailey 00:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Following systems need adding to text:
*No-till farming
*Permaculture
*Agro-ecologic system Mentioning of agro-ecsystem
Also include the use of fake sowing beds. 
KVDP (talk) 08:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include other organic farming systems 

message: This page reads like proselytising for organic farming. It is a long way from being neutral. I'm surprised it hasn't been challenged already. It makes sweeping generalisations about "chemical" farming that are not backed up by any reference. mahaabaala (talk) 11:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote this? 

message: This article was essay-like and duplicated content in organic farming article.  merged it into that article.Jytdog (talk) 17:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged
Talk:Holy Diver (song)

message: Once upon a time, I was in Hawai'i and me and my Uncle were listening to this fantastic metal compilation album he put together. There was one song that he said was "Holy Diver" covered by Iron Maiden. Anyone know if he was right about this?
I strongly doubt it.  Practically every cover IM has recorded with any quality was featured on Best of the B Sides: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_of_the_%27B%27_Sides DFS (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Covers

message: WTF?!? A little help please... Austinmayor (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of 'Holy Diver' Lyrics

message: Clutch sing the line "Now tell me, Holy Diver, where you at?" in their song 'Cypress Grove'. Always makes me think of this song. In the official lyrics page, the Holy Diver is capitalised
link to lyrics: http://www.pro-rock.com/index.cfm?page=discography&view=lyrics&albumid=13&lid=30  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.87.179.62 (talk) 14:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible reference
Talk:Mizpah, Minnesota

message: The article has a decent amount of content, but the language is quite dull and redundant. I recommend the frequent contributors to try and spice up the writing, and maybe find some more information. The article has a great start! --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!)  00:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hungry for Heaven

message: Are there any factual evidences of the similarity with Baba O'Riley by The Who?
— Zingus J. Rinkle (talk) 00:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Teenage Wasteland
Talk:T-2 mycotoxin

message: "T-2 (also known as "Yellow Rain"), a trichothecene mycotoxin..."
Doesn't T-2 mycotoxin stand for trichothecene mycotoxin? 
Lunakeet 21:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible redundancy- 
Talk:RAA Place

message: Could someone please advise why the 'Santos' Sign on the building was removed. As it is the tallest building in SA, there must be a reason. JabbaXErnie 04:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2007 'Santos' Removal 
Talk:N62 road (Ireland)

message: The sign in this photo is from the 1960s or maybe even the 1950s. (Someone who knows about these things might have more info). The arrow through it indicates that the alignment of the road (and possibly location of the sign) were changed, perhaps 20 years ago - it appears to have been touched-up and repaired - probably after the road realignment.
There was virtually no expenditure on direction signs in the 1970s or 1980s, when this short stretch of road, (4km north of Templemore)  was probably realigned.
The symbol on the bottom right-hand corner of the sign is an old logo of the Irish Tourist Board (Bord Fáilte); who were responsible for most of these non-fingerpost signs on Irish roads before the 1970s.
This is the Irish equivilant to a "pre-Warboys" road sign, dating from before our adopting adapted versions of the UK's Warboys Committee directional signage. I think it would be a good addition to the Road signs in the Republic of Ireland page under old road signs and will add it to that. --Rdd 13:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old road sign