lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Non-abelian

message: I changed this to a disambig, hopefully to remove confusion. Non-abelian group still redirects to abelian group. -- Fropuff 17:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page
Talk:Arnold Krug

message: The Violetta was developed by Castrucci, not Stelzner (do a google search- turns up a pay-for-view article, but it's there); Stelzner developed the violotta, for which Krug and Draeseke wrote their Sextet and Quintet respectively. Schissel | Sound the Note! 07:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Violetta/Violotta

message: They aren't really checkable for me so I don't know where they would go in the prose. Does anyone have any idea? Cleanelephant (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Hachisuka Masakatsu

message: Content not derived from former deleted article. Fg2 07:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article does not contain enough explicitly military history to justify including it in the MilHist project. I have therefore removed the WPMILHIST template. PKKloeppel (talk) 20:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not military history
Talk:Mohawk Airlines

message: I am in the process of creating a WikiProject for Defunct Airlines. In it, I am attempting to compile a list of past destinations for defunct airlines, with a particular interest in airports that are no longer served by airline service. If you have any comments or you'd like to help, please comment here or on my talk page. -Jondude11 05:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject for Defunct Airlines 

message: We need an article on the last reincarnation of Mohawk, hubbed in SYR, which died around 1992 because the FAA grounded it for safety reasons. -newkai t-c 14:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  198x-1992 Version
Talk:List of Washington State University people

message: The same user Briancash that said Adam Savage graduated from Washington State University with a PHD in Criminal Justice posted this on the Adam Savage page.  This fact is not cited and is highly unlikely.  (Briancash has a habit of placing erroneous posts, especially to the List of University of Washington people)
Keith Millard wasn't on your list of famous alums of Wazzu, shame on you. Randalla3 (talk) 15:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jaffna University Helidrop

message: Long, detailed, and well-cited. Sure could use an infobox, though. LordAmeth 09:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: *The list of casualities can be moved elsewhere
*find some images - right now too much text.
*Information on combatants - would already be there in a page like IPKF. Repeating it here in detail is distracting
jaiiaf 15:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Improvements 

message: I read the following sentence in the article: "Colombo agreed to a devolution of power to the provinces the Sri Lankan troops were to withdraw to their barracks in the north, the Tamil rebels were to disarm." Am I the only one who doesnt understand it! 
Also, it has a cited reference which is inaccesible as the page has moved!Lilaac (talk) 13:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please check

message: Perhaps I've missed something, but how is the battle an Indian strategic victory? They did extricate most of their paracommando force, but none of their strategic goals were accomplished Seleucus (talk) 16:26, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Strategic victory?
Talk:Battle of Kolhapur

message: The Marathas were clearly not an Empire, they deny being a Confederacy...therefore they should just be called Marathas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.182.56.188 (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the source for your claim? WBRSin (talk) 07:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Maratha

message: Just a heads-up, I'm looking at Duff right now, and this is all he says about this claimed battle (and I'm having a hard time finding RSs that actually call it by this [or any] name):
MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duff source backs up almost none of this
Talk:Kathryn

message: * What does the name "Kathryn" mean? --AAA! (talk • contribs) 08:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin?

message: * This message was put in Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: "There really shouldn't be separate disambiguation pages for Kathryn, Catherine (disambiguation), Katherine (disambiguation) and all the Kathy variants, they should all be merged together -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Sack of Surat

message: The Marathas were clearly not an Empire, they deny being a Confederacy...therefore they should just be called Marathas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.182.56.188 (talk) 08:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Maratha

message: In one of more recent revisions, Utkarshraj Atmaram noticed that strength & casualties of Shivaji & Mughal army is unsourced; diff, but apparently a IP editor  removed this tag inserted by Utkarshraj again, diff. I took the article back to the last stable version, but CoveringIncidents objected this version. 
 Please don't use edit summaries like these, diff where you removed the cn template but claimed of providing sources. If you or anyone else got a reliable scholarly work which mentions about strength and casualities in these battle, feel free to add it back. Untill then, I think it's best to remove all these unverified claims. Packer&Tracker (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just leave it blank, PROBLEM SOLVED CoveringIncidents (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  , diff. I concur with you on it. Cheers. Packer&Tracker (talk) 17:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualities & Strength
Talk:Shivaji's forts

message: Does the title Shivaji's  Forts imply that
# Forts that he built
# Forts that he captured (say famously)
# Forts that are popularly associated with him
We need to be clear in order to add value for presence of this article on wikipedia -Mayuresh 12:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better caption?

message: hi, the following text by random editor has been moved here until it can be verified, reformatted before moving to article page -Mayuresh 12:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Random Edit
Talk:Netaji Palkar

message: Why this wrong information is being put to public? Netaji was not Kayastha and another imp point is that he was Father in Law of Shivajis daughter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.80.57.2 (talk) 09:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My reply is delayed by 10 years :-) 202.80.57.2, I think the person who added CKP 10 years back was correct. The newly added source actually does say he was CKP. Also, that name is very common in that community(see People of India - Singh's book from oxford university press). You are right that present day CKPs will not accept arranged marriages with Marathas. You are probably basing your opinion on that. Based on a quick glance of listings on marriage advertisements of Maharashtrians on the Snehaprabha marriage website (check it for yourself), the community they marry most (outside their own) is the Saraswat Brahmin community and vice versa (I might be mistaken as this is just a personal observation). But this is not surprising since researchers have stated that they are socially and ritually close to the marathi brahmin community(except the non veg part)- and saraswats are usually non vegetarian. However, one should note that Shivaji was an exception as he was a king. He wore the sacred thread at the time (just as the CKPs do)- although historians have disputed his rights to do this. More importantly, it could just be that Netaji Palkar was not very caste minded hence had no objections. Or maybe the niece was a widow and widow remarriage was strictly forbidden in brahmin, ckp,saraswat communities until mid 1900. Or maybe Netaji had political gains from the marriage. These are all speculations. Just as yours is. So we cannot make any judgement based on the marriage. All we need to do is reflect the sources. Acharya63 (talk) 06:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netaji Palkar - Not Kayastha
Talk:List of Indian states and union territories by GDP

message: The State GDP figures added in the page from 2021 to 2024 do not have any source. The sources cited are either dead link or talk only about figures till 2021. 2406:7400:63:5F9E:243F:345C:6EB9:1B81 (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 12:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This Forbes article (https://www.forbesindia.com/article/explainers/gdp-of-indian-states-union-territories/88157/1) has data for projected State GDP (aka SGDP) for 2023-24. Will find out and share data for 2022-23. Jinishans (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 September 2023 

message: No values entered PraveenKumarMurugaiah (talk) 09:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No gdp info on the table for some states
Talk:Wollaston (Quincy, Massachusetts)

message: Neither the City of Quincy nor Quincy Market were named after Edmund Quincy.  The City of Quincy was named after Colonel John Quincy.  Quincy Market was named for Josiah Quincy III.  I've removed the lines from the article claiming Edmund as the namesake of these two locations.  --CPAScott (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that neither were named after Edmund (in fact, there are plenty of sources I've probably added myself elsewhere on Wikipedia that speak against that), but that's not what it said. It said that Edmund was the progenitor of members of the Quincy family, after whom those things were named. It just required a more nuanced reading, is all. You're welcome to change the wording, if you like, but the assumption that it said anything like "these things were named after Edmund Quincy" just isn't correct. Hope this helps. --King of the Arverni (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmund not namesake of city or market 
Talk:Han Yu

message: Should the 诽韩案 that happened in Taiwan in '76 have a section here?
[] & []
 Hanfresco 08:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: gkfjgkjdfghdfg dfg fg dfgdfjk dfb eorig awopefpweofz.cm vsdlkjfaeporg ae giopaur ga.dm,fn.a;esodaewytaakdjbv zsdkgl;kdsnz.cnxv,.zbvkiryag ta dsfgkajdabdvkla vaor8ygs argalksr legn; kbgk,jfg alkgbasdfg  gjhkldr gjbgdkx gdrbgl hfaaeos hfg ;aoesn fglj ef;beas;bf aksdjbfl kasgrtyeiorutafn,mbdv,. dvblzsnbdmfawlei fho;i reguyaerkjttkjgn krtgklfjlgihxgf  s;dtig;osirgl dfknbv x,cnvgxdfkjg ;lditgd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.35.4 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dudeeeeee 

message: The Chinese original is substantially longer than the English translation. Should the Chinese be shortened down? Mentula parva (talk) 07:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote
Talk:Kʼinich Kʼan Joy Chitam II

message: The date conversions are correct IF you use the Julian calendar and the very dubious Thompson - 584285 correlation. Conversions are almost never done like this. Generally when authors use the Thompson correlation they also use the foolish Proleptic Gregorian calendar. Since conversions to Western calendars in books and web sites are not standardized, often wrong and use either the Thompson correlation or the Proleptic Gregorian calendar, this is a problem for Wikipedia editors. A way to solve this would be to only write the year, or give these dates as long Counts with a footnote about the western calendar date. Senor Cuete (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date conversions
Portal talk:Current events/October 2006

message: What? October had 31 days this year too? Is this really necessary to mention? It
seems a bit... stupid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.163.164.96 (talk • contribs) 
Anyone know why the portal template is breaking? The November 2006 article seems to be using the same exact code (except with November as the month, of course), and works fine. --Czj 08:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Youth pastor

message: If this article seems Christian-centric, that's because it is. A pastor is specifically a Christian minister, so there are no POV issues there.
However, it would be great if someone could add some info about non-Protestant Christian groups, such as Mormons and Roman Catholics! :) IrisWings 08:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pastor = Christian minister

message: Right now this article is very US-centric. However, I felt that a stub-class tag was a better alternative to an NPOV tag (because that would seem to imply the omission was intentional).
I can only assume that other countries with large Christian populations besides the U.S. have a growing trend of youth ministry as well. Any info on this would be greatly appreciated. IrisWings 08:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other countries?
Talk:Michał Dymitr Krajewski

message: Is there a reason that Krajewski's picture is on the left side of the main page?  I like it because it is different from other pages, but I think it would be better to remain uniform with the general Wikipedia format of having the picture on the right.
Bkbyler (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to move it, I agree with you. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  02:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Centurione II Zaccaria

message: Has no one ever equated this name to the Ancient Roman word "centurion?"
If not, why not?  It certainly seems to fit the time and place, at least during the Middle Ages!  Thus, possibly he was in charge of "100 mounted knights?", or give me a better answer for the usage of this name, at this time?96.19.147.40 (talk) 23:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has no one ever equated this name to the Ancient Roman word "centurion?"
Talk:International Commission on English in the Liturgy

message: The Controversies section, as originally written, says "ICEL translations (from Vatican-approved Latin originals) have often been denounced as tendentious, unfaithful and inelegant."  This is precisely the type of pronouncement that is covered by the policy that "Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged."  I have toned it down a little bit, and have provided a citation, but if you have a source that supports the statement as originally written then please let me know.
Bwrs (talk) 04:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The ICEL translation of "Credo in unum Deum" is now "I believe in one God"; of "invisibilium omnium et invisibilium" is "of all things visible and invisible"; of "Et cum spiritu tuo" is "And with your spirit".  Esoglou (talk) 18:52, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversies section 

message: There is content at Mass of Paul VI#Revision of the English translation which should be incorporated into this article. Daask (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreements with Congregation for Divine Worship
Talk:Gary Smith (guitarist)

message: Hi, can the 'warning'/whatever thing about Gary Smith's profile only have links from self-published sources be removed? I've added a link to his information in 'The Wire' magazine. He's part of their 25th anniversary celebrations and he is featured in issue #275 (as shown by the link). I think he deserves to be in Wikipedia. Well, of course I do: I'm listening to his album! TheoGB 10:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Self Published Sources'
Talk:Wilfrid Napier

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. The individual is at this writing indefinitely blocked from contributing because of this issue, and content is being removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violation. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 15:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:Paul J. Sachs

message: Did he do any painting of sailboats?163.195.20.74 09:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It might be good to remove the q.v. notation and replace it with the Wiki notation of double square brackets around the names of others you believe to be notable. I think that notation, in printed works, is designed to alert the reader that there is an entry for another individual; we have links available to us here.--AndrewHowse 19:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(q.v.)" 

message: In the "Albertina Affair" section the title "Emperor of Hungary" is mentioned, as in linked source: http://www.dictionaryofarthistorians.org/rossiterh.htm
This title never existed officially! Hungary had kings, and the last Hungarian kings were the Habsburgs, who were also Emperors of the Holy Roman Empire, and later Emperors of Austria, but Hungary never was an empire, just a kingdom.
I haven't found any other source, so it leaves me confused.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.134.201.175 (talk) 18:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emperor of Hungary?
Talk:President Adar

message: The president is unnamed in the original Battlestar Galactica - does anyone have any citation to show that his name was Adar? if not this article should be renamed President of the twelve colonies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.6.163.129 (talk) 13:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Although his name was not spoken in the show, he's listed in the credits as President Adar. See the IMDB listing. --BlueSquadronRaven 14:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Captain Apollo

message: This article should be moved to Apollo, as Captain is his rank, not part of his name. GoodDay (talk) 21:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find anything in the various naming conventions that pertained specifically to fictional characters, so, as near as I can tell, the best advice comes from Wikipedia:Naming conventions itself, which reads in part: "A good title will name the article with what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize and associate with the topic in question; we generally follow the most commonly used name verifiably used in reliable sources in English." and "Articles are named as precisely as is necessary to indicate accurately their topical scope, while avoiding over-precision. Readers should not have to read into the article to find which of several meanings of the title is the actual subject, but there is no virtue in excess." Since the character is frequently referred to as "Captain Apollo" within the series and the title of the article thus disambiguates the character from the Greek deity or lunar lander of the same name, I believe it should stand as is (likewise for the other characters of the original Battlestar Galactica). --BlueSquadronRaven 05:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okie Dokie. GoodDay (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain isn't a name
Talk:Narantaka-Devantaka

message: Ok the names here are confused, the spelling should be Naratanka-Devatanka. Its combination of Nar atanka, terror to men and Dev atanka, terror to devas.!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.252.72.61 (talk) 11:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Confirm that this also Thotsakhirithon (ทศคีรีธร) in Thai.
:Kortoso  (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai name
Talk:Count Iblis

message: The demonic appearance of Count Iblis somewhat resembles the Imperious Leader, maybe this should be noted
Davidac18643 19:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Demonic appearance

message: Having some discussion about the definition of heat, work, etc for open systems in the Talk:Heat and Talk:Conservation of energy articles, and your opinion is one that is respected by both sides. (maybe not agreed with, though :) Your input would be appreciated. PAR (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Heat
Talk:Serina (Battlestar Galactica)

message: The article says "Serina was a fictional character on BattleStar Galactica". But that is wrong! Because every TV show is fictional. So, Serina was REAL inside the show. There are however fictional characters on TV shows, like the holodeck simulations on Star Trek, for instance Professor Moriarty in the episodes "Elementary dear Data" and "Ship in a bottle". That's a difference. 217.250.173.185 (talk) 10:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  why fictional? Serina was real
Talk:Lieutenant Starbuck

message: Starbuck is a character in the novel Moby Dick by Herman Melville. 1978 is not the beginning of History.
Ptyxss (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Starbuck. --BlueSquadronRaven 06:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of classical Japanese texts

message: This list is full of classical texts or authors of classical texts, but not all of them are classics; some, it could be argued, are barely known! I would like to suggest that this article’s title be changed to “Japanese classical texts” or “Classical Japanese texts,” and further that a corresponding subcategory be created under :Category:Japanese literature for categorizing articles on Japanese classical text. Further, (or as an alternative) subcategories should (also) be created for each language or literary period. Any thoughts? Jim_Lockhart 12:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not the list compiler, but I think it most certainly should be classical texts, ie anything up to the Meiji Restoration. That said, the list is extremely poor at present. I previously created :Category:Old Japanese texts in the hope of listing only texts of the Nara period. However, apparently that was not clear as much later works have been added. That will need to be fixed later. I support subcategorizing it by linguistic period. I see that you have just created :Category:Late Old Japanese texts which seems appropriate. Will you also be creating :Category:Early Middle Japanese, :Category:Late Middle Japanese, and :Category:Early Modern Japanese as well? (Nara and Heian period Japanese are my passion, but I plan on creating articles for Early Middle Japanese, Late Middle Japanese, and Early Modern Japanese when time permits.) Bendono 13:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the remaining categories. Bendono 14:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classic texts? Or classical texts? 

message: There is version of this list organized as a table (and likely other modifications) at User:Bendono/Sandbox2. It hasn't been edited lately, and I thought it might be helpful to editors here. Daask (talk) 07:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notification of draft with table formatting
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rockpocket

message: User:Rockpocket
Category talk:	6
Category:	3
Image:	18
Mainspace	2218
Talk:	802
Template:	3
User talk:	636
User:	61
Wikipedia talk:	88
Wikipedia:	633
avg edits per article	3.34
earliest	08:07, 29 December 2005
number of unique articles	1336
total	4468
Rockpocket's editcount summary stats as of 09:40, November 3 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 09:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)