Talk:Static-X

message: Just to clarify. Static-X has referred to themselves as "Evil Disco" not "Death Disco". I will change if no one contests this. StereoDevil (talk) 15:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, you're responding to comments that are 5 to 8 years old... Sergecross73 msg me 12:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evil Disco 

message: This page is getting out of hand again. We need to remove trivia items from Cameos / Appearances. Posters on the wall are are not appearances. I will remove if no objections. StereoDevil (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: *Exactly why doesn't the article list the Static-X songs that appeared on soundtracks, but it lists just the movie/video game? Please list the songs that appeared on them, as most soundtracks don't seem to have articles. --G VOLTT 16:15, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack songs? 

message: These two sections really seem to take away from the page. Is there not another place in which they could be put instead of the Static-X page? Maybe on the pages for the albums each is on (in the case of Otsego, all of them?). It just doesn't seem like an encyclopedia article.
Enfestid 23:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a page for I'm With Stupid a while ago, but I have no idea what to do with the whole Otsego thing. I agree though, it doesn't seem like an encyclopedia article very much. - James 13:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm With Stupid/Otsego

message: * Does this part of the article make much sense to have? It's just a list of bands that have nothing to do with Static-X, except for some of the major influences. It also seems a little bit more of a definition of a music genre. - James 19:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it not note-worthy? I see no reason to remove it. Numerous other articles include similar references.
Enfestid 23:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related Artists and Influences 

message: Hey, I edited the biography quite a while ago, and I just remembered one thing I had been very confused about. The biography said Ken Jay left the band due to "political differences", however the former members section says he left due to "musical differences", so in the biography I put "due to musical and political differences", just to be sure. I'm pretty sure either one is wrong, but I can't seem to find out which one is. Does anyone know what actually made him leave the band, or should we cut out the reason he left from the article? - James 17:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken Jay 

message: Static-X Influences (from an interview of 1999): Joy Division, The Sisters Of Mercy, Coal Chamber, The Prodigy, The Chrystal Method... 
These bands are rockbands or big beat artists. They're not industrial artists. So, where is the influence of industrial music? Static-X is definitely not an industrial metal band.
I have to disagree with you fully. Firstly, a band can be influenced by another band, yet still appear in a separate musical genre. E.g. Many bands list The Beatles as influences yet they do not follow the same formula of 60s rock and roll.
Secondly, two of the influences in your supposed source are described in Wikipedia as Industrial in nature: Coal Chamber are included as "Industrial Metal" in the Genre tab, and The Prodigy are seen as combining many elements incuding "industrial". 82.18.228.81 19:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Prodigy had never used industrial elements. That's dullcrap. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.122.26.22 (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences 

message: Alright, the only reason that Static X is "Nu metal" is because they came out around the same time Nu Metal was at the peak of it's popularity.  I've heard every Static X album, and I can say without a doubt, that they are in fact an Industrial Metal band, which is what I am going to change it to.  If you have a problem, complain to someone else on another page.
129.252.215.115 20:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Static X is Nu Metal and Industrial! 

message: :Image:Shadow zone.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Shadow zone.jpg

message: :Image:Machine.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Machine.jpg

message: :Image:Static-x44.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Static-x44.jpg

message: On the former members listed, three of them are just session members. I propose taking them off the list of former members listed in the article(former members would mean that they were in the band instead of just sitting in).
-- Mogthetormentor 19:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Members 

message: Does anyone know if these guys are the main act or are Shadows Fall, I see them on Oct, 10 2007. Skeeker [Talk] 03:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opperation Annihalation Tour

message: Why is there no information about Static-X's Comic book? It was produced by CHAOS! comics in 2002 as a tie-in to the Machine album. It was supposed to be an ongoing series but CHAOS! went bankrupt a few months after the publication. The comic was released as standard art cover, photo cover and autographed collectors editions. 1 2. Second link has a synopsis, sut is a retailer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.198.205 (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic Book 

message: where was he born?
couldnt find any on that  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.35.42.15 (talk) 16:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  nick oshiro background 

message: After searching extensively I cannot find a single reference to verify this claim. I ask that a 3rd party verifiable source be provided. And "Their popularity was pushed (sic)" is a POV claim with also requires a source, without it the inclusion of this information would be trivial anyway. Rehevkor ✉ 20:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: With continued searching, I have found mentions of it which suggest it to be a fact. But that doesn't address the POV issue, the trivial issue, or even the notability of the fact. Rehevkor ✉ 20:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't have to "search" – for the absolute source is (!) the mass-produced and completely cited Mac OS 9 CD here. It's a mass medium like a book or LP album or magazine or cine film etc.pp., verifiable by ten thousands of owners and users. Third party sources are not trustworthy and therefore cannot verify anything. Why don't you primarily erase sentences marked with "citation needed" (they are not verifiable at all)? While my citation is precise, complete, direct, definitive and verifiable by ten thousands of OS9 CD owners, you destructively keep at deleting this citation. See Wikipedia:Vandalism. |Memex (talk) 15:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Woah there, vandalism? I'm trying to engage you in a constructive discussion and you play the vandalism card? Back off. I have asked you to provide a 3rd party or even 2nd source to establish and address the notability, POV and trivia issues, can you do this? Rehevkor ✉ 16:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Push It" video Mac OS 9 CD 

message: I picked-up something by Static-X today, and I couldv'e sworn it was a single, but it identifies as a demo by them when inserted into Media Player or the Xbox 360. Can anyone identify what this is? — It includes the tracks "Push It", "Bled for Days" and "Down". • GunMetal Angel 23:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not familiar with any release like that. Are the tracks actually demos? Rehevkor ✉ 00:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not being rude, but how would I know if they are or aren't? • GunMetal Angel 04:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are in a better position to tell than anyone else. Demos are usually of lower production quality compared to album releases. Could it be this: ? Rehevkor ✉ 12:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demo 

message: Why is there no section for 2001-2005 anymore? There's five whole years, Tripp's arrest and departure from the band, and two whole albums (Machine and Shadow Zone) missing from the article. Why is that? - SeraphisCain (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems they were broken by this edit a couple of weeks ago. Now fixed. Rehevkor ✉ 14:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the 2001-2005 section? 

message: Chelsea Grin have an album titled My Damnation, wherein a Static-X song also has this title. Should a hatnote be placed on the top of this article, saying "For the Static-X song, see Start a War"? Or would that be totally unnecessary  since the song is not even a single and just a little album track that the band probably never even played live? I was just wondering • GunMetal Angel 02:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Damnation 

message: * http://loudwire.com/wayne-static-widow-tera-wray-remembers-late-husband/ Sergecross73 msg me 16:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Static-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224033250/http://www.hellfest.fr/artistes.php?id_art=346 to http://www.hellfest.fr/artistes.php?id_art=346
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111016205220/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=161574 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=161574
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified