Talk:Stop sign

message: I disagree that the octagon shape is used because it "allows drivers facing the back of the sign to identify that oncoming drivers have a stop sign and prevent confusion with other traffic signs. It was also chosen so that it could be identified easily at night, since the original signs were not reflective.".
The reason for the octagon shape is because if it's ever covered e.g. with mud, snow or leaves, then it's still obvious what it means. Also, when visibility is poor (e.g. in fog), the shape can be made out if not the writing, so again it'll be obvious that it's a stop sign.
"allows drivers facing the back of the sign to identify that oncoming drivers have a stop sign" doesn't make a lick of sense. Drivers do not need to know what signs the drivers on the opposite side of the road are seeing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.112.129 (talk) 17:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasoning for use of octagonal shape

message: :The holy grail is a three-way intersection that uses one of each type of stop sign.  Logically, the best place to look for these is where a municipal boundary runs down the middle of a road, and one municipality uses ARRÊT signs and the other uses STOP signs, and there also just happens to be an old ARRÊT/STOP left over.
:Starting at the corner of Anselme-Lavigne and Boulevard Saint-Jean and heading east on Anselme-Lavigne, use Google Street View to check out the corners of Anselme-Lavigne and Baffin, and Anselme-Lavigne and Gariépy.  A short section of the municipal boundary between Dollard-des-Ormeaux and the Montréal borough of Pierrefonds-Roxboro runs down the middle of the road in this area, so the stop sign in the southern half of Anselme-Lavigne (eastbound lane) is in Dollard-des-Ormeaux and says "STOP", while the stop sign in the northern half of Anselme-Lavigne  (westbound lane) is in Pierrefonds-Roxboro and says "ARRÊT"; meanwhile, the side street (Baffin or Gariépy) still has an old "ARRÊT/STOP" sign (which will presumably eventually be changed to "STOP", since it is in Dollard-des-Ormeaux). -- P.T. Aufrette (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems as if nearly every individual on the entire planet knows exactly what "OK" means. "Stop" is probably not quite as universal as that, but as English words go, at least it's a short word for a simple obvious concept. I can see three factors for deciding what word goes on a stop sign: ease of adoption (re-using someone else's design is simpler and faster than creating a new one); ease of acceptance (if people have a political objection things won't go smoothly, if people see their own language they will like it, if people see a particular foreign language that's acceptable to them then that's OK); ease of understanding (as long as people will certainly know they have to stop, it doesn't really matter WHAT you write on there). TooManyFingers (talk) 07:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Three-way intersections that have one each of ARRÊT, STOP, and ARRÊT/STOP

message: Are Francophone countries in Africa solely using “STOP” on their signs or do they have any deviations from the standard? -- sion8 Contributions | Tᴀʟᴋ ᴘᴀɢᴇ 06:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Francophone Africa

message: I have gone through and done a big cleanup. Removed parentheticals and personal essay text, fixed grammar and syntax, rectified units, put in appropriate section headings and subheadings, rectified flow of information, image placement and captions and chronology, removed dead wikilinks and added appropriate live ones, added a subsection on school bus stop signs, consolidated the secondary images into a gallery, tagged unsupported assertions, and added applicable templates. We very badly need more documentary support from reliable sources in this article. Shouldn't be hard to find it in the MUTCD and the appropriate UNECE standards, amongst others. There's a ref to a very relevant MUTCD section here on the talk page; I'm about to go incorporate it into the article. Work still to be done includes, primarily, removing external links per the WP:EL policy. Those external links that can serve as referenced reliable sources per WP:CITE need to be incorporated as such; the others need to go away. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major cleanup — more work needed 

message: A 1980s National Geographic featured a photo of a New Guinea "ol kar mas stop sapos yu lukim red pela mak" sign. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I could try and find it; do you have any more info? The name of the articel, or the (approximate) date? 76.117.247.55 (talk) 01:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.englishforums.com/English/WokLongRot/ghdbc/post.htm --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PNG 

message: For whomever decides to tackle this section expansion, here are some (unfortunately US-centric) refs:
*http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2011/07/29/208467.htm
*http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=jw8iAAAAIBAJ&sjid=g38EAAAAIBAJ&pg=5463,272736&dq=stealing-a-stop-sign&hl=en
*http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=PBPB&p_theme=pbpb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1279B868F28D3150&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
*http://thesouthern.com/news/article_824429b5-63c3-528c-894c-3016b1e211e8.html
*http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/207016/speak-no-evil/joyce-milton
I've not got time to do anything with them myself unfortunately. Nikthestoned 15:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some references for the "theft" section that requires expansion 

message: I took the description at face value and hope the illustrations I recently contributed agree with it. However, I've never seen a photograph of one that has actually been installed by a road crew or property manager. The closest image Google seems to come up with is the pre-1954 American octagon. knoodelhed (talk) 06:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow circle alternative Vienna Convention stop signs? 

message: This article seems to be written in a rather... political manner in some places. The section on North America even goes so far as to accuse stop signs at highways as having negative effects on freedom of speech. First, I just wanted to make sure everyone had the opportunity to enjoy the fact that someone felt so passionately about stop signs. Second, I think we should discuss maybe cleaning up some of the more vitriolic language in this article. Thoughts? JMike93 (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, User:czar appears to have impliedly adopted the position that the WP:CIVILITY guideline overrides all core policies (see discussion at User talk:czar). Thus, while some of the language in this article appears to deploy some rather peculiar logic, it would be uncivil, if I am reading that editor's position correctly, to critique such language as violating WP's core policies.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

text: I found the "North America" section horrendously POV. Essentially, it is a diatribe against overuse of stop signs. The first step of cleanup would be to move most of its content into a section labeled "Controversies" or "Criticisms".  That content is not about WHAT A STOP SIGN IS; hence belongs in a narrowly labeled section. And rewritten to emphasize WHO is making those strongly opinionated statements. NOTE: I make this observation independently of any judgment about the accuracy of what is said nor quality of sources; that is not relevant to how it should be presented. ToolmakerSteve (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Great horny toads...whoever put up that angry screed against stop signs clearly didn't understand this is an encyclopedia here, not a debate-team exercise or city council meeting or congressional hearing or platform for propounding personal pet peeves. Much of the case law they cited (at long length) applies only to specific states or situations and really didn't belong here; this also isn't a law school homework assignment. I have removed most of the rant, and moved the text that could be retained in an NPOV manner to a new "disadvantages" section. Pogorrhœa (talk) 04:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politicization of article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stop sign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tss/tsmanual/tsmchapter3.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222121748/http://www.mtqsignalisation.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/default.asp?operateur=panneau&panneau=P-010 to http://www.mtqsignalisation.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/default.asp?operateur=panneau&panneau=P-010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've come across a picture with a stop sign in Iceland that is written as STANZ instead of STANS. I think it was around 1974 that the letter Z was dropped from the Icelandic language so it would make sense that the signs would read STANZ instead of STANS. Not sure how to reference this as I don;t think the picture is open source and I oonly have one at hand that has a stop sign in it. Lotsofmagnets (talk) 01:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , can you share this photo? Fry1989 eh? 17:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icelandic stop sign spelling 

message: The text "The unique eight-sided shape of the sign allows drivers facing the back of the sign to identify that oncoming drivers have a stop sign and prevent confusion with other traffic signs" shouldn't need a citation. It's an obvious fact, such as "Because the card has been face down at all points in the game thus far, the players have no idea what the card is". Would THAT be tagged with "according to whom"? If the text had said "... was intentionally designed so that drivers from the sign's other side can tell that it can only be a stop-sign and not any other sign", then, yes, the fact of its being intentional WOULD need a citation. But if traffic-signs have the shapes they have, and only one is an octagon, and human minds have the powers of reasoning that we know them to have, the imaginary world in which it is NOT true that the sign allows drivers not facing its front to identify it is simply not a possible world that can actually exist. The statement being thus INEVITABLY true, it should not have been flagged. Nor should it have been omitted just for being inevitably true. It's a worthwhile thing to have pointed out.74.64.105.76 (talk) 01:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In Europe, drivers are trained, if they don't encounter a yield/stop sign when entering an intersection, to look for the backs of triangular and octogonal signs on other roads, to determine which road(s) have priority or if it's a no priority intersection (in many European countries, priority diamonds are very rarely posted). 93.136.47.163 (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary "According to whom?" tag 

message: Under "Stop signs around the world", it says: "Portuguese-speaking countries with the exception of Brazil use the standard version of the sign".
But this isn't a very satisfactory answer, because it doesn't describe Portuguese-speaking people's opinion of "the standard version of a stop sign". (I know what *I* think a standard stop sign is - but it's not a good idea to let me dictate other countries' road signs!) :) TooManyFingers (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portuguese 

message: In my opinion this section isn't named correctly. It discusses some specific difficulties or pitfalls of intersection design and stop sign placement, their effects on safety, and how to mitigate those difficulties. A better name would probably be "Details of installation".
A section called "Disadvantages", if there is one, should IMO be dedicated to reasons why a correctly installed stop sign is counterproductive or dangerous under certain circumstances, or problems that can be caused by the presence of a correctly installed stop sign - in other words, situations in which stop signs are inherently a bad idea, not just tricky to install. TooManyFingers (talk) 08:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disadvantages" section 

message: Anong sakuna ang pinipigilan ng stop sign 223.25.60.125 (talk) 04:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esp 

message: The source used to support crediting Harry Jackson as inventor of the first stop sign credits him with no more than creating the first red stop sign. 😃😃😃😃 —2600:8800:7000:13B:B253:2534:B241:74DD (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Strikes Again! 

message: Should the stop sign Unicode character be discussed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.55.54.51 (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  🛑 

message: The redirect Arrêt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Awesome Aasim 04:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Arrêt]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]