lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aharon Katzir

message: Why is this article in the :Category:Antisemitism in Japan? --Error (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitism in Japan
Talk:Albert Mandler

message: The account given of Mandler's death is uncited, dubious and clashes with other detailed accounts; eg Herzog's War of Atonement. I propose to replace this account with Herzog's, and add a bit of detail regarding Mandler's activities. Discussion prior to this is welcomed.  Gog the Mild (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Amir Hadad

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here  and/or here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Article needs quite a bit of work. Quite poor phrasing, questionable sourcing, etc.. Tennis really isn't really my territory, otherwise I'd have taken up the task. Mooonswimmer 20:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Amos Ori

message: There is a picture in lithuanian version.--Igor "the Otter" 16:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An image 
Talk:Arie Vardi

message: Following a dozen or so removals by various SPAs of the subject's sourced year of birth, I'm mentioning this article at WP:BLP noticeboard. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: YoB removal
Talk:Classical liberalism/to do

message: *The POV dispute needs to be resolved. From what I can gather the dispute is over the relationship between classical liberalism and libertarianism. Unless this issue can be resolved here, it will require arbitration. 
*The article needs copyediting. Nevertheless, it doesn't make much sense to do so until the POV dispute is resolved, since continual changing of the content and the tone of the article will make it impossible to produce a good copy.
SFinside 15:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Aviv Kohavi

message: Hello, the sir name should be spelled KOHAVI, not KOCHAVI. Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.66.231.95 (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: These series of edits are regarding Kochavi's recent (2018-10-26) appointment as Chief of General Staff, which is Chief of Staff which is Commander in Chief of the IDF and about him being a vegan ,, my edits are based on the sources that I've cited, as close to the source as possible without plagiarising i.e. violating copyright rules. If anyone wishes to edit another way, then kindly use sources that support the edit. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 10:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some edits 

message: Please change the article name to Aviv Kohavi Guyzehavi (talk) 10:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please change the article name to Aviv Kohavi
Talk:Avraham Yoffe

message: Why I cannot change font of the sources I put in bibliography? Title of Yadin's book Bar-Kokhba: The Rediscovery of the Legendary Hero of the Second Jewish Revolt against Rome should be written in italics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arslan Arie (talk • contribs) 13:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of font in bibliography
Talk:Avri Ran

message: The article was expanded about a year ago. It seems that an editor translated the HE wiki page which seems totally OR here without the references. I've cut it back down. The body is saved in the history if it needs to be salvaged. --Shuki (talk) 23:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are violating your ARBPIA topic ban, aren't you? .Nishidani (talk) 08:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  prod 

message: The subject has a twin brother, Nir Ran, who made a career in Shin Beit and went on to become a senior figure in Israel's homeland security, airport branch.  The only evidence so far for him is in Arutz Sheva, which is not RS. The datum is important, given Avri Ran' immunity to law, whch several people in the know find ìinexplicable'. He  held up in Nir's home when police were searching for him. Nod nod, wink wink. Nishidani (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother. hebrew or any other RS source needed
Talk:Ayoob Kara

message: * Referenced  — could use a book source, if available
* Covered 
* Structured  — could use a bigger lead
* Well-written 
* Supported  — needs another photo or two, probably
* Understandable 
--Metallurgist (talk) 18:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B class assess
Talk:E caudata

message: There seems to be some confusion as to whether e caudata has an ogonek or a cedilla. It could be the result of some people not knowing how to tell the two diacritics apart, or it could be genuine variation in the way e caudata was drawn. It might be better to split it into a separate e caudata page if more info is gotten. --Ptcamn 14:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: E caudata

message: æ is the ligature of "a" + "e". In old Gaelic literature ę is the ligature of "e" (regular letter) + "a" (subscript) making it's closer meaning to "ea" instead of "ae". See A. G. van Hamel Foundation for Celtic Studies discussion on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4201:4BF0:6458:9363:DD0:3096 (talk) 23:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ę vs  æ 

message: If there is to be further discussion of this (it was discussed previously at Talk:Ogonek, let's have it at Talk:Ę.  Wareh (talk) 15:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest [[Ę]] merge proposal 

message: I think there is a serious error here.  "As early as the twelfth century"?  Let me quote from Bischoff (Latin Palaeography, Cambridge, 1990, p. 122):
The e caudata...which is very frequent even in pre-carolingian times for the diphthong ae, replaces the latter more and more in the tenth and eleventh centuries; the result is an uncertainty as to where ae should rightly be used and where not...In the twelfth century simple e replaces the [e caudata].
Mjhrynick (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: Since someone has asked for verification of what I wrote about e caudata in Old Norse, I need to explain that I have no source saying that Old Norse /e/ and /æ/ merged in pronunciation during the language's history, or that e caudata always represents umlaut of a, but I assume this because modern Icelandic writes /æ/ as /e/, and most examples of e caudata in Sweet's Icelandic Primer have a cognate with non-umlauted a. Therefore, I think my claims are fairly sound, but they would do well with official verification from a historical grammar. Erutuon (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Norse tailed e
Talk:Ben Avram

message: The year of birth in the lede does not match the year of birth in the categories.
Neelix (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of Birth 
Talk:Boris Tsirelson

message: I see the corresponding article in German: , but fail to make an interwiki link to it from here. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 13:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki link 

message: "Tsirelson is known for undoing other people's Wikiedia edits without explaining his reasons for doing so." This phrase is added by User:Daqu just after he "Added the fact that this Cantor set is homeomorphic to the middle-thirds Cantor set" to "Smith–Volterra–Cantor set", and I thanked him for this addition and added wikilink to "Homeomorphism" to his words "topologically equivalent". Very puzzling. I was never so much puzzled by another wikipedian. I would be glad to see his reason explained. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Without explaining his reasons 

message: Now emeritus, see Tsirelson's homepage. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emeritus 

message: High grade cancer diagnosed: fall 2019.
Voluntary assisted death: January 2020, Pegasos, Switzerland.
(But wait for reliable source, of course.). Happy editing (and ultimately, happy exiting, if you like). Boris Tsirelson (talk) 20:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For those edit warring on this article: please respect the last wishes of Boris Tsirelson, and wait for reliable sources. His talk page is not one. Tercer (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sadly, this is now confirmed by a RS (with the article appropriately updated). --JBL (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since he was a Wikipedian, obituary added to Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 21:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Tsirel added himself to Wikipedia:Notable people who have edited Wikipedia in November 2008: diff. It's also on his user page, see March 2007. Johnuniq (talk) 10:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia user
Talk:Chaim Brovender

message: :Centralization of discussions from Wikipedia talk:Orthodox Rabbinical Biography Collaboration of the Week#Chaim Brovender and User talk:IZAK#Chaim Brovender: 
I think this Rov is NN, and I proposed . Anyone care to look it over and review? - CrazyRougeian talk/email 07:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Namiba - the source you added very clearly says 'Brovender was driving from Efrat to his home in Jerusalem' - seems he lives in Jerusalem, not Efrat. Two for the show (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It says he was head of a yeshiva in a settlement, which qualifies him for the settler category.--TM 23:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the category is  for "Residents of Israeli settlements in lands captured by Israel in the Six Day War of 1967: the West Bank and Golan Heights.". Please revert. Two for the show (talk) 23:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

text: If you make a significant contribution to New York City, that is enough to have a NYC category. Brovender is a major figure in an Israeli settlement, which justifies the settler category.--TM 19:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settler? 
Talk:Dorit Beinisch

message: :Request granted. El_C 00:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://lapa.princeton.edu/eventdetail.php?ID=250 and http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/beinisch-drops-a-bombshell-1.3776. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 19:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Category talk:American radio programs

message: I'm not sure whether the individual programs listed individually in the "category" section should be there or whether they should fall in subcategory.
I would propose that the categories be revised to include perhaps "Comedy," "Drama", "Variety," "News/Talk," "Music", "Quiz/Audience Participation," and "Children's/Family," as well as any others that might be proposed.  For instance, I think "Drama" might easily be broken into "Mystery," "Science Fiction," "Adventure," and perhaps others.  I would welcome any input any of you might have.Badbilltucker 14:01, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about a comedy subcategory? Bob and Tom and a few others would work perfectly. Aaрон Кинни (t)
Added several categories (talk, music, variety, sports, comedy, religion) and began moving articles to them Mapcat 07:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories?
Talk:G-Nome

message: G-Nome, or G-NOME? We seem to be the only place spelling it G-nome. Box blurbs in English give it consistantly as G-NOME, while their German counterparts have it as G-Nome. – Quoth 13:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the installed game on a windows computer is "G-Nome" not "G-NOME" even though the game disc and other places refer to it as "G-NOME". Weird, huh? --Popcorn2008 03:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Isn't there more information about this game or is this it? --Mimic12455 06:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information 

message: What's with the overabundance of red links? Many of the phrases don't seem worth having articles about. -Phoenixrod 19:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links

message: Could you please readd the link to Planet G-NOME and put back the image of the box?  Thanks.--Xgmx (talk) 18:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to go to Planet G-Nome, but it's not working properly and there honestly isn't anything there anymore. DarthBotto talk•cont 13:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  fix this 

message: Hey everyone! I just wanted to inform the populace that there's a wiki dedicated to the G-Nome series, called "G-Nome Wiki". I'm the admin, but there's barely any activity from people other than me. If you have something to contribute to the more in-depth and dedicated wiki, just check it out at its home page. DarthBotto talk•cont 11:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not a proponent of advertising and I am recanting this. DarthBotto talk•cont 11:06, 01 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  G-Nome Wiki 
Talk:Ehud Manor

message: Can't we do better than supply a photograph of Manor's tombstone? There must be appropriate pictures of the man himself available for inclusion on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barmispain (talk • contribs) 08:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph - of Tombstone??? 
Talk:Ehud Shapiro

message: As independent sources that could be useful, there is a dedicated discussion of his early work on ILP; some discussion of his ILP work in textbooks and at least two book reviews of The Art of Prolog findable on Google scholar. I don't know about his later work, however.
 Felix QW (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some independent sources
Talk:Elad Peled

message: There is another Elad Peled: http://weblaw.haifa.ac.il/en/Research/ResStudents/Pages/EladP.aspx --79.202.201.215 (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  disamb. 

message: Does it make sense for the Yom Kippur war to be added to the infobox as his service is mentioned in the intro Jonathan Teagan (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  InfoBox
Talk:Efraim Halevy

message: This article just increased dramatically in size because I found that someone had written a very good article on Ephraim Halevi.  Now all the info is merged here, and the Halevi page is a redirect. Joshdboz
This article needs division of text into subheadings. -Thomas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.54.42 (talk) 12:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Erich Walter Sternberg

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  I don't think this article is B class: it lacks some basic things that any bio should have, as well as some that a composer bio should have.  I detail these in my review on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 02:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Eva Jablonka

message: The use of the term "banalities" to describe evolutionary psychology and memetics strikes me as quite biased.  There are clearly many researchers (some quite distinguished) who do not view these topics as "banal" at all, and still others who hold epigenetics in similar contempt. If this language is Jablonka's own, it really ought to be cited.  If it isn't, a more value-neutral word like "approaches" might be better. 99.182.80.19 (talk) 05:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banalities? 

message: @: I'm a little surprised to have links to Jablonka's major research subject areas removed. Readers of a biographical article cannot be assumed to be au fait with everything, and may well be reading the article to get a rough idea of the subject's interests and background. If that's agreed, then links to such interests are highly relevant, even if to biologists they are "obvious". The fact is that obviousness is a moving target. Links are cheap and unobtrusive to informed readers, helpful to the rest. I think we should reinstate them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I assume this was a good-faith revert made quickly on patrol, so I'm putting it back now. Hope that's ok. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:03, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  First, you broke the formatting of a word that was italicized, second, things like "culture" don't need to be linked and are the definition of excessive linking. Natureium (talk) 13:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for links to major research areas
Talk:Vyborg–Petrozavodsk offensive

message: There is absolutely no justification to use Swedish names for places that were unilingually Finnish speaking. I guarantee that there is not a single English language history book on this war that refers to Koivisto as Björkö. Thus its usage here is contrary to mainstream sources, and thus it can also be classified as original research. Looking back at the old discussion at the archives of the Continuation War article, I can see that the result of that discussion was "Closed as no consensus to use any particular name for the town from November 1939 to September 1944", so you can not use that discussion as some sort of precedent. --89.27.36.41 (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The most reasonable proposal at the time was to use Finnish or Russian depending on stable de facto control, also, as confirmed by contemporary English language accounts (that is, common usage)—for example, names of cities and towns as reported in LIFE magazine at the time. "Viborg" is Viborg, see, for example, the June 26, 1944 issue of LIFE,I don't see any evidence for Björkö being used at the time, Koivisto is the only term used in contemporary (at the time_ English language sources, all of them in reference to the conflict. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 13:52, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a name change overnight in the middle of a war would be confusing. We should be consistent throughout the Continuation War. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, then I'd suggest LIFE magazine is a most appropriate representation of common English language usage for the conflict and how it was reported and understood. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 21:10, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Koivisto and Viborg reflect English language reporting at the time. Are there any others which pose an issue? VєсrumЬа ►TALK 22:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Björkö and Viborg? 

message: I regret that all the citations to these archives... shattering and all, are not admissible for this article. The Soviets glossed over conflicts which went less than well. By way of example, if Glantz uses archival materials as part of his conclusions, that is one thing. However, to quote Soviet archives directly here constitutes use of primary sources and is WP:OR. I'm not intending to gut related content, however, there are passages which will require new citations or eventual removal. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 22:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian ministry 

message: Note 28 containts a reference that is not in the source list (Baryshnikov 2006). Jack194.153.60.231 (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP comment about reference not in source list
Talk:Bagrat III of Georgia

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed
:Generally good, but what does Still in his minorities mean?  I didn't spot any other language issues but there may be more - recommend a careful read through and copyedit.  Worldtraveller 12:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed
Talk:Lilith (magazine)

message: Is this the same magazine as the anarchao-feminist seattle-based paper that created the famous "Lilths manifesto"? At Swedish wikipedia there is an article about that paper, but i don't really know if they are the same.  The magazine refered to in the swedish article has been distributed since 1969, the magazine in the english article has been published quarterly since 1976, but it does not really say when it was first created.  It would be good to know so that a correct interwiki can be crated. Muneyama 14:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked up the Women's Majority Uniuon and the "Lilith Manifresto" and it seems that it is a different paper:  https://www.historylink.org/File/2321 https://historylink.org/File/2320 and according to this source, they ran out of funds to continue publication after 1971: https://www.bolerium.com/pages/books/285619/lilith-unnumbered-final-issue ~~~~ Katja0610 (talk) 06:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Two different magazines?
Talk:Guy Hever

message: :I uploaded a photo that seems like fair use. Its of poor quality though. -Reuvenk[T][C] 15:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo Request

message: This seems to fail notability. Wikipedia is not a missing persons register. Factsontheground (talk) 16:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Factsontheground, actually he is quite notable. But we can vote. best, Jim Fitzgerald (talk) 20:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Glossary of education terms (A–C)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 14:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 
Talk:Haim Be'er

message: The apostrophe in the title goes the wrong way, so the name "Haim Be'er" does not link up from other articles. Does anyone know how to fix this?--Gilabrand 15:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  something wrong with the apostrophe 
Talk:Haim Gouri

message: Based on the article, which states, "On the other hand, Gouri was also one of those who called for "The Complete Land of Israel" to be incorporated into the state. However, after the 6-Day War, the reality of the consequences of a protracted occupation, and his keen moral sense, led him to the left, to a very different position." I felt it necessary to add the tag.  What is the 'very different position'?  What would Mr. Gouri say about leaving the rest of his life being forgotton/hidden in Wikipedia?   CasualObserver'48 (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Incomplete tag 