lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amapá

message: There is a part of the text that says: "who doesn't know the expression FROM OIAPOQUE TO CHUÍ?". I guess nobody, excluding brazilians, knows. Mind if I delete it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.79.15.165 (talk) 19:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oiapoque to chuí?? 

message: The radioactive mineral thorianite is also found in this Brazilian state.Agre22 (talk) 01:52, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thorianite is found in Amapá

message: I tried to find information elsewhere online about
immigrants from Tajikistan living in Macapá but couldn't
 find any. Wikipedia's page on Macapá also doesn't
 mention it and neither does the portuguese wikipedia.
Sounds like a prank.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.0.9.187 (talk) 06:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find any information either. Since four months have passed with no one coming forward with any citation to back this up, I'm removing the reference to Tajik immigrants.Goodsdrew (talk) 15:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tajik immigration

message: The redirect Marabaixo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 06:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Marabaixo]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:ScriptX

message: I suggest a brief description here, and a link to a main article under Kaleida Labs.  --Metzenberg 21:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The first paragraph of this article seems to be copied directly from http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/lang/scriptx/drdobbs/drdobbs-1194b.html without proper citation. I do not know enough about the topic to correct the article, but this should be revised.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.166.166 (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper citation of source? 

message: Considering this is a page about two different pieces of software, shouldn't it be two pages? For example, ScriptX (development environment) and ScriptX (Internet Explorer add-on).--ϟᴇɴsᴏʀꜰɪʀᴇ (✎|‽) 14:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page?
Talk:Pará

message: somebody should add how it received international outrage after the death of dorothy stang. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.175.5.174 (talk • contribs).
:Agree, or otherwise note the ugly social situation, pervasive corruption, etc., it made clear. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  international outrage 

message: "Pará has attracted numerous Portuguese, Spanish, and Japanese immigrants. They have told their stories in a permanent space, the "Room Vicente Salles" of the "Memorial of the People", in Belém."</br>
This is unacceptable, please, correct.--Adûnâi (talk) 12:53, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopaedic style 

message: What is "Foundation: March 24, 1928" in reference to? It only appears in the infobox and nowhere in the article but I think it became a state when Brazil became a republic in 1889... but it's unclear what "foundation" even refers to here, whether it means the original province or the state. Either way I don't believe 1928 would be accurate. 2600:8803:8713:4A00:8D79:1C89:C92D:7C78 (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundation Date
Talk:Rondônia

message: Shouldn't the IPA transcription be [xõdoniɐ] instead of [xõdõnia] ? 161.24.19.82 17:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation of Rondônia

message: There is none. There should be. - BillCJ (talk) 08:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Why does Akuntsu redirect to the Rondônia state article? And why is it exclusively spoken about in the Tribes section? - Io Katai (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I may turn it into its own article if there's any interest. It's a rather sad story it seems.--T. Anthony (talk) 11:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akuntsu 

message: This article is & deserves to be among the most controversial on Wikipedia: this Brazilian state is the heart of the devastation of the global rain forest -- as anyone can see via a quick aerial glimpse of it on GoogleMaps or GoogleEarth or Bing -- the entire place looks, now, as though it's been plowed, it didn't used to look like this. The article needs to 'fess up and reflect the controversy, at least mention it in text and then link to other more specialized articles and sites, without some textual reference this is just whitewash, like saying, "Darfur is a place in Africa". The article is internally-inconsistent on this, moreover, as-written currently -- in one section it says the state is "70% rain forest", in another it says it is "60% de-forested" -- can't have that both ways, this badly needs a context & controversy - sensitive update & rewrite. Kessler (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy? 

message: Apparently, a network of 168 dams is being built in Rondonia State.  One of the larger ones features a five mile berm that has fifty generatation turbines.  I will not make an encyclopedic entry, as my information is limited. Homebuilding (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive Construction of Hydroelectric Dams
Talk:Nissan Cube

message: 209.247.5.177 left the following comment on the article on June 2:
 Please insert a photo of the CURRENT Nissan Cube. (Oh, and please don't delete that.)
Leedeth 07:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The first three images in the gallery are obvious 3D renders, despite being sourced as photographs. 121.223.193.217 (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Worse yet, I recognize them as coming from Gran Turismo 4. Come on... 132.177.24.185 (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The fourth image overlaps the third generation production info. Can someone fix this? I don't now how to. 67.171.172.44 (talk) 21:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: Half of this section is about the US and Canada so maybe it should be renamed?
Thanks Jenova20 12:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: UK and European Availability

message: The Nissan Cube was featured in an episode of Top Gear. Can somene please put this in? Lbc07 (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top Gear
File talk:York central hall.jpg

message: It's a lovely picture, but almost no information exists on the internet about the architect or the date of construction.  Could someone at the University go inside and read the details from the plaque?  (I used to work there as a student in the 1980s, setting up conference equipment for the General Synod and suchlike) Benet Allen 21:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Paraíba

message: There seems to be a VASTLY disproportionate emphasis on this gemstone in this article!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjm319 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT is going on with tourmaline?! 

message: *the admixture of mongoloids and caucasoids are very clear, and not brown..birracial =/= multirracial (most of two racial admixtures)..the pure "mamelucos" (mongoloid + europoid) have a light skin and not are "browns", because have a mongoloid antropometric feactures in the head for example and face/et cetera..the therm is very false and afrocentric..the mongoloids pures and caucasoids pures not have origin in congo..the two races have origin in eurasia (east and west)..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.198.116.251 (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: pardo not is only multirracial or brown
Talk:Paradise (Joy and the Boy album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 21:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Quicker Than Light. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 20#Quicker Than Light until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Lennart97 (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Quicker Than Light" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sergipe

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages.  RudolfRed (talk) 22:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Category talk:Universities and colleges in Philadelphia

message: User:MusicMaker5376 keeps on reinserting Villanova into this category, despite the fact that Villanova is not located in the city, and no other schools outside the city (e.g. Haverford, Bryn Mawr, Swarthmore, Widener, Arcadia) are included in the category.  SHould this category be restricted to universities and colleges located within city limits, or should it have a broader scope?  If a broader scope, what should that broader scope be?  To include Villanova and no other schools outside the city seems completely indefensible, but where ought the line be drawn? If we are talking metropolitan area or urban area, the University of Delaware is located in both, but I doubt anyone really thinks it should be included in the category.  It seems to me the category has a specific meaning, and there's really no reason to include schools not located within city limits. john k (talk) 08:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What should be the scope of this category?
Talk:Mato Grosso

message: No, it's not called that - it is a derogatory term used by those in the southeast or south (sul e sudeste). It's a regionalist view that does note take into account the part of Mato Grosso itself in the exploration and definition of Brazilian territory, instead reaffirming the decades-old prejudicial view that the south part of the state was "more developed" and that was the reason it was divided. In fact, it was political pressure to have more power than the northern part, where the capital and all the administrative and economic power sat. Mato Grosso was split to create more political seats in Brasília - to create another state means more deputados, senadores e all that political caste (and I use caste in the most derogatory meaning possible).
Sorry if this turned into a political rant, but I believe the wikipedia should not endorse this political view into its articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanketai (talk • contribs) 21:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Mato Grosso? 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 
Talk:Smilets of Bulgaria

message: Hey people, this English-like transliteration of Bulgarian names is killing me! There is no Y, no TS for Ц, no digraphs. Bulgarian is a Slavic language and should therefore use Slavic latin script, the best variant, which was adopted by a number of institutions including the United NAtions, but NOT the Bulgarian Interior Ministry, is the Serbian latin alphabet with the addition of one ROmanian letter for Ъ, so, here is the RIGHT ROMANIZED rendering of the Cyrillic letters for Bulgarian: 
A, B, V, G, D, E, Ž, Z, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, F, H, C, Č, Š, ŠT, Ǎ or Â, J, JU, JA
This will allow you to fully and best render the Cyrillic orthography and the pronounciation of Bulgarian names, such as Silvija (Силвия, я=й+а), Julijan (Юлиян, ю=й+у, я=й+а). Believe me, when I see Smilets, or Borovets, or Kaloyan, or Yoan, or Yuliyan, or Silviya, or the Traditzzzzzia (the right should be Tradicija) shop in the British Embassy in Sofia I go maaaaad! Bulgarian is not English, it is located in the opposite edge of Europe and through the centuries had ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with English. So, why do you, oh ignorants, use a kind of ENglish orthography?!!!! A wrong choice, you've chosen one of the most inconsistent and difficult orthographies. Well, if this is what you look for, why not use Gaelic then? It is even more difficult, inconsistent and even impossible to learn*, it is even farther from Bulgaria.... Good reasons for people like u!
* an example: AOILE is read as [IFA]. Aren't you enjoying it! How nice! None of the letters has anything to do with any of the sounds! Or peut-être vouz préférez le français? It is the third of the inconsistent orthographies in Europe. Why am I writing this? Because I saw the name Smilets in the article for the Bulgarian tsar Смилец. In my opinion, scientists should be (and they are the only ones who do) use the transliteration (romanization) rules adopted by the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (the above). Not the police orthography, which unfortunately was chosen to be imposed by the notoriously incompetent Administration Minister, Nikolaj Vasilev. This "police orthography" one can find in our passports, which has produced masterpieces such as Yuliya, Mariya, Yoana, Tsvetelina, Siyka, Yancho, Zhivko, Kyulyavkov, etc. The right should be Julija, Marija, Joana, Cvetelina, Sijka, Jančo, Živko, Kjuljavkov).
WHy all this, you will say? BECAUSE I changed the name of the tsar Smilec, actually, put the "ignorant" version SMilets in the brackets.
85.11.148.60 21:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Andypandy.UK

message: See User talk:Blue Tie#Eating crow. In a nutshell, while I had many "facts" on my side, my interpretation of them was profoundly misguided and I owe Blue Tie a major apology. I believe Blue Tie was acting in good faith all along. 
I still think Andypandy would make a good admin and his actions as described by Blue Tie were an honest mistake. --A. B. (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no hard feelings toward A.B. and I agree that Andypandy should be an admin. --Blue Tie 16:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 postscript
Talk:Norm-referenced test

message: Please cite your references according to some particular style, like APA style. My preference is APA style because the education field is now so closely tied to educational research, which by and large uses APA style. At any rate, don't just describe your reference, show how people can find it. Chris53516 13:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Some of the text is quite USA-centric, like the No-child policy. Are there other practices to include?Mango bush (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other practices
Talk:All Hail, Liberia, Hail!

message: Perhaps the main article should also include the former national anthem of Liberia, which was replaced by the present one only a few years ago. It is the same music as the American patriotic song "Hail Columbia", and the words are the same except that Liberia is substituted for Columbia. Or at least the former anthem should be mentioned in the article.
:If you know something that should be added to the article, be bold and do it! I didn't know anything about a former national anthem. Alan 19:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Why has the line been changed from "green be her fame" to "great be her fame"? I'm pretty sure "green be her fame" is correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.164.135.103 (talk) 03:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics changed incorrectly?
Talk:Jefferson Station (SEPTA)

message: I removed the text, which was about the Reading Terminal and Pennsylvania Convention Center and not Market East Station, but still may have use elsewhere:
The terminal and tracks leading to it sat unused from 1984 until the 1990s when it was converted into part of the Pennsylvania Convention Center. The elevated viaduct leading to it was deteriorating and had a negative impact on the surrounding community of Chinatown, and the section from Vine Street to the Convention Center has been replaced with a ramp for vehicle access.
-- danntm T C 14:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous Matter
Talk:Udo Kier

message: I tagged one of the first sentences as dubious because, although Kier has been seen with men (or whatever you want to call it), etc., his sexuality is contested. I haven't come across any evidence which suggests he is in fact homosexual. I removed the category "Gay actors" as well until someone can provide a source for these claims. He has consistently denied being a homosexual, in fact, according to what I have come across. Aaрон Кинни (t) 21:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go:   qwm 13:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems more like an attempt by a fan to edit the page to their own liking. --Joshmaul (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We should be patient with new users and education them gently while they are making mistakes and learning per WP:BITE. Also please be assume good faith per WP:AGF. I look forward to working together to improve the article. Best,-- — Keithbob • Talk •  15:47, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Official" representative? 

message: *.jpg (left to right) Udo Kier, Weöres Sandor, Patricia Adriani, and Gabor Body - hu.wikipedia.orgXb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 23:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: hu.wikipedia

message: Add new video game credit
Year:TBD
Title: OD
Role: TBD
Notes: Motion Capture Thebignex1993 (talk) 05:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 07:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2023
Talk:Dominican University of California

message: I reverted this page to an old edit because I strongly suspected copyright violation (I just couldn't find proof). If it is not, revert back. --Douglas Whitaker 21:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We were contacted on OTRS about this article (OTRS ticket #2006072310012554). User:Dominicaninfo is a PR employee of this school. The version she wrote is not a copyvio (to that end, I've reverted to old version), although it is in sore need of some wikilinking.  Raul654 00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: I just did a major NPOV overhaul of the article, though more could be done.  What this article really needs, though, is cited expansion and perhaps some pictures.  On the first front, I'd recommend editors peruse Dominican College and Dominican University hits at books.google.com.  Just skimming the first few hits it's evident that there's a bunch of good content out there.  The university is more than a century old; I'm sure there is plenty of interesting history worth posting in this article.  If there are any Dominican University students or faculty who happen by this article, meanwhile, and you have pictures you've taken of the campus that you'd like posted here, please do so. JDoorjam     Talk 20:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issues and references 

message: This article is straight up PR by Dominican--ie, free advertising via Wikipedia. I'm going to take a meataxe to it. Tapered (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Page needs a lot of work. I've tagged it for COI, advertising and too few third party sources. Feel free to sharpen up your meat ax again. The other option would be to just revert all the edits, but that would catch non-promotional edits in the crossfire. Paris1127 (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: PR Piece

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that this article's "Campus" section be replaced with a "Basic information" section.  He or she is doing so with no discussion or edit summaries so don't his or her rationale.  But deleting a necessary section and replacing it with one that merely repeats - verbatim - what is already in the lede of the article is so unhelpful and disruptive that I'm comfortable treating it as vandalism until this editor begins communicating with us.  ElKevbo (talk) 01:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Campus" section and replacement with "Basic information" section
Talk:Fitler Square

message: Image is incorrectly captioned Filter instead of Fitler. tharsaile (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have lived in Rittenhouse Square and Fitler Square for over 10 years, and I've never heard anyone refer to the area as "Rit-Fit". I like it, but I think it needs a citation or should be removed. Ernieba1 (talk) 13:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rit-Fit
Talk:Samoan Civil War

message: Wanted Samoa so to gain power in Europe! I think this is a gross over statement of Samoa's strategic and military worth to Europe in the 1870's.  This needs to be removed.  I think what was meant was that colonisation was important to the German Empire as there was little territory free to colonise at the time so as to rank with other European powers (very, very different concepts). Thecrystalcicero (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this called the First Samoan Civil War? Dictionary of Wars lists four separate Samoan Civil Wars: 1880–81, 1887–89, 1893–94, and 1898–99. This wikipedia entry seems to be an amalgamation of the 1887–89 and 1893–94 wars, despite the resolution of the 1887 war in 1889. Rwestera (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with this.  It seems like the user that created this article in 2006 just made up the title and topic.  And Dictionary of Wars (which this article doesn't even follow the naming convention of) is an exceptionally weak source anyway - it's not a book on Samoan history.  I've been reading some books more focused on Samoan history, and none of them call this the Samoan Civil War or the First Samoan Civil War or anything.  Since it seems like consensus was very weak for this title originally, I'm inclined to think that this article, Second Samoan Civil War, and Samoan crisis should all be merged into some sort of History of Samoa, 1877–1899 article.  SnowFire (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of war
Talk:Associação Desportiva São Caetano

message: "On 27 October 2004, while playing in a match against São Paulo, São Caetano defender Paulo Sérgio de Oliveira Silva (Serginho) suffered a fatal heart attack. The club was penalized heavily by the CBF, which has since marked a decline in their performance." - is the penalisation because of the heart attack - if so, why? Auto98uk (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: São Caetano was actually penalized because they let Serginho play even knowing that he had heart problems. --Carioca (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart Attack Player
Talk:CICT-DT

message: There's a statement in the article, "In the fall all CanWest stations will be operated out of Calgary". What is the source for this piece of information? It sounds rather dubious. Also, the fall of what year? If this statement can't be supported it'll have to be deleted. 23skidoo 22:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: In the fall ...