lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Keren-happuch

message: The reason why we transcribe it with pp even though it isn't pronounced doubly is to distinguish it from p (פ). The other way would be to transcribe פ as f, but you'd never do this for technical reasons, it doesn't express the relationship between פּ/פ properly. GordonGlottal (talk) 00:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please familiarize yourself with the transliteration scheme Wikipedia uses sitewide. It is a slight modification of ISO 259, which is a good place to start. This does not conform. Zhomron (talk) 01:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have asked you several times before -- please link to the wiki policy you are referencing. GordonGlottal (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  MOS:HE Zhomron (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is for names, it means we should write "Keren-hapukh" in-line in the article and title (currently Keren-happuch, presumably because it's common enough to override because of KJV. If not it should be changed).  It doesn't say anything about how to do a technical transliteration. If we followed this for technical transliteration we would never use vowel diacritics! GordonGlottal (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why it's pp
Talk:Kibroth Hattaavah

message: Which is the preferred form of place name? The article title is Kibroth Hattaavah but all references in the text are to Kibroth-hattaavah
BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:22, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preferred form of place name 

message: Quote, "The narrative goes on to tell of a huge number of quails brought by the winds to both sides of the Israelite encampment, which the people gathered, but Yahweh sent a plague as they were chewing the meat. The text had previously stated that the Israelites would have been able to consume quail for a month."
There isn't a contradiction between verses 20 and 33 as the article currently implies; this is based on a misunderstanding/mistranslation of the Hebrew. The English says, "before it was chewed", but the original Hebrew uses the word, "יִכָּרֵ֧ת", or "cut off". That is to say, a month had gone by as God foretold, and they ate the food during that month, but before the food was CUT OFF from them, He sent the plague. I don't edit Wikipedia very often so I don't really know how to edit this information into the article itself, but it does need correcting somehow. 
Source: http://biblehub.com/hebrew/yikkaret_3772.htm 
Update April 2017: Never mind, I managed to update the article myself. I tried my best - if there are any formatting errors, sorry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:982:C201:4172:3CAA:DF4E:6B3B:410 (talk) 20:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:Kinah

message: Hi!
Kinah is also the in-game currency for the game Aion. Would someone please disambiguate? I would, but don't know how to do it properly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2fargon (talk • contribs) 02:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this page be deleted or merged with the page on kinnot? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinnot)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.48.49.177 (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I put a 'merge' suggestion on both pages last month. Feline Hymnic (talk) 12:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

text: I support, but the merged article has to be called Kinah not Kinnot. This is because it would cover three separate subjects: Biblical lamentations (referred to by the singular Kinah); the Biblical city named Kinah; and medieval liturgical lamentations (referred to by singular Kinah or plural Kinnot). In order to cover all these subjects, only "Kinah" is appropriate. Ar2332 (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is already being discussed on WP:JUDAISM, where I explained the difference between the two terms. Debresser (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, that discussion has become stale, and hence archived at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism/Archive 37#Qinah, kinah and kinnot. We have one merge template still up; any interest in continuing, or close with no consensus to merge? Klbrain (talk) 21:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I for one opposed the merge, so I am fine with closing this as no consensus to merge. Debresser (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete or merge 

message: Commentaries I have seen on the Book of Lamentations seem to use the spelling 'qinah' rather than 'kinah'.  And the term seems to be used with two apparently different meanings: the idea of a dirge or lament; a linguistic three-two pattern of stresses.  There seems to be a variety of topics under this banner. Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The two spellings mean the same thing, and are just that: different spellings, nothing else. Perhaps two authors used different spellings when writing about different aspects of the kinah, and that might explain why you got the incorrect impressing they are referring to different things, but they are the same. Debresser (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  q or k
Talk:Creswell, Oregon/Archive 1

message: - (edited 10/6/6 by unsigned): NEVER MIND
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Oregonbob (talk • contribs) 5:29, October 6, 2006
::Hey, Oregonbob, I'm glad you like Wikipedia, but I'd like to point out that talk pages are for discussing how to improve articles. They are not general discussion forums. Thanks! P.S. Don't forget to sign your posts with 4 tildes (~~~~). Katr67 12:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, I am so not the Wikipolice. No worries. Here is more info on talk pages if you're interested. Happy editing! Katr67 15:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections are coming
Talk:Katabon Mosque

message: Multiple dead links on this page make the content unverifiable. Please help to remove any more dead links and do not add unverified content here.Messiaindarain (talk) 07:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead links

message: This looks interesting. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm 
Talk:Manasseh (tribal patriarch)

message: I have changed Menashshe to Menashe since the latter is more prevalent, as in: Bnei Menashe; Samuel Menashe; Menashe Kadishman; Menashe Amir; Shalev Menashe; etc. However, on second thought, Menashshe  may be justified due to the Dagesh Hazak in the letter Shin of the Hebrew מְנַשֶּׁה, indicating a gemination of that letter. (Shiafishman (talk) 02:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Menashshe''' or '''Menashe''' 

message: Herbert Armstrong was not hebrew, nor head of a protestant church.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.10.196 (talk) 00:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He was the head of a Protestant church. Alephb (talk) 17:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herbert Armstrong
Talk:Brownian bridge

message: There seems to be an error in obtaining the general brownian bridge W(t) from brownian motion B(t): the text says B(t) = W(t) - tW(T), but this doesn't satisfy B(T) = 0. 
Should this be B(t) = W(t) - tW(t)/T? (I've fixed this)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irimias (talk • contribs) 03:46, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct.  I've fixed it. Michael Hardy 18:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see someone reverted back and removed the square exponent, and I completely agree. Otherwise, notice that the variance in any T\in(T_1,T_2) would be always less that 0.25! --User:zeycus 11:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I incorporated a reference where this is proved. --User:zeycus 10:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The general case variance does not agree with the most common example of a brownian bridge.  Bt-tBt in the 0-1 interval.  it seems to me that the variance for the general case should be (T-T0)(T1-T)^2/(T2-T1).  it is possible to derive the variance of the general process using integration by parts, theorem 4.1.5 in oksendal.
JHS
201.244.172.86 20:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variance 

message: Is there an analogue of the Brownian bridge, but for a Lévy flight? Albmont (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lévy bridge? 

message: It would be nice if there was a comment on how one might simulate a Brownian bridge. Pdbailey (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You have the distribution for any one point along the bridge, so you can simulate it recursively by first simulating one point in between the first pair, then you have two adjacent pairs and can simulate another two points for those two bridges, etc.. CHF 204.111.91.15 (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  simulation of a brownian bridge 

message: This is really poorly written.  I'm not sure what the second paragraph is trying to get across otherwise I'd try to edit it.  Rewrite anyone? Ckhenderson (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intuitive Remarks 

message: In the construction  W(t) = B(t) + t Z,  it doesn't say that  Z  must be independent of  B.  Could someone confirm that independence is required (or at least that certain dependencies are not allowed)? LachlanA (talk) 04:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independence? 

message: Is a Brownian bridge a diffusion process, using E.B. Dynkin's definition? If so, where is the proof? Robert O'Rourke (talk) 00:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it a diffusion process?
Talk:Moriah

message: There is a hermetic tradition which claims that Enoch was on mount Moriah. This needs to be backed up more so it can be put in the article.  ADM (talk) 10:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Enoch and Mount Moriah

message: Isn't there a link between the book of Genesis Mount Moriah and the Tolkien's Lord of the Rings Moria? We could make mention of this in this article. -- Edmond8674 (talk) 15:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other reference: Tolkien? 

message: What is this sentence actually saying? "Some scholars reference the conversation Jesus had with the Samaritan woman at the well, where He stated that the Samaritans were inaccurate in their knowledge of the worship of God (John 4:21–24)." I am not sure what it's saying some scholars are referencing the convo for, is it talking about the region of Moriah? Penguinmlle (talk) 02:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Beats me, but I removed it as unsourced anyway. Zerotalk 07:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correlation Wording
Talk:Nadab and Abihu

message: Strange fire
how: strange? where from?
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.202.173 (talk) 11:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange

message: One thing this article has not discussed is that the fire may have been kindled of incense that was ritually offered in idolatrous Egyptian ceremonies, and brought out from Egypt during the Exodus. 172.10.238.180 (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Incense

message: I removed the section as unsourced for now.  It was  then a citation and tag was added later by another editor.  The dictionary source didn't support any of the content...  —PaleoNeonate – 03:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian mysticism 

message: Most are primary, but some also aren't.  The few secondary ones are usually very old and uncritical.  For instance, this is recognized to be part of nationalist mythology and ancient law codes, power justification for a small human elite that represents the "official divinity" and cannot be challenged, an ultimate loyalty lesson.  A capricious god taints the place's holyness himself and humans are again responsible for cleaning the mess with yet another special ritual.  The prohibited mourning is like shunning and original sin doctrines, the uncleanliness or sin is like a contagious disease, must taint a larger group, etc.  Like monotheism was the result of political power concentration after the wide development of agriculture.  I would be surprised if modern academic sources cannot be found.  —PaleoNeonate – 05:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Nymphas

message: Since the question of his/her gender is fun and about the only thing to be said about Nymphas, I'd love it if someone with the skills took a paragraph to explain it.  Simply showing the greek word with and without the accent and explaining hints otherwise in the verse.  Maybe one sentence saying that "women couldn't own property" is a Hollywood stereotype but not really a thing in Greece in 50 AD. --Mrcolj (talk) 15:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek question
Talk:Posse Cat

message: The cook has Tom's classic scream. TobytheTramEngine 16:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I proposed that it be deleted because it doesn't meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Wikipedia is not intended to be an indiscriminate collection of information such as plot summaries of episodes of shows. If there are sources indicating that this particular episode had some cultural or or societal impact, then those could be used to create an encyclopedia article; right now, the article is just a plot summary, and those are not appropriate for the encyclopedia. It may warrant mention in part of the main Tom and Jerry article. MastCell Talk 18:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ophrah

message: The Lord's Altar was more  powerful than that of Gideon's father. Khabonina1 (talk) 07:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gideon was used by the Lord to destroy his father's Altar and build an Altar to the Lord. 

message: Are the nanes related? Lollipop (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orpah&ophrah
Talk:Pekah

message: This states that the Regal Year in Judah started in Tishrei, rather than in Nissan. What is the source for this?--87.70.118.103 (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regal Year 

message: "Tiglath-Pileser in an inscription mentions the slaying of Hoshea by his fellow Israelites." The Hoshea article states "It is likely that Hoshea, disappointed by the lack of Egyptian support, endeavored to avert the calamity by resuming the payment of tribute, but that, distrusted, he was forced to fight, and was taken prisoner in battle. ...What happened to Hoshea following the end of the kingdom of Israel, and when or where he died, is unknown." Is then Pritchard accurately cited here or is Pekah meant? Mannanan51 (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoshea
Talk:Perga

message: *Merge. This makes sense with a redirect from the other article to here. Student7 (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: User:Kaloqq has added bits of this website http://www.adiyamanli.org/aspendos.html as copy paste to this article in addition to adding a commercial website as the reference. I have already reverted one article Sillyon where he did the same thing. Pretty elaborate effort to spam links so perhaps well meaning. Saffron Blaze (talk) 09:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 
Talk:Pygarg

message: Why does this article single out KJV, making no comment on any other English language translations?  Really, if we're going to give how KJV translates the word, we ought to give the same information about some others.
; KJV : These are the beasts which ye shall eat: the ox, the sheep, and the goat, The hart, and the roebuck, and the fallow deer, and the wild goat, and the pygarg, and the wild ox, and the chamois.
; NIV : These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat, the deer, the gazelle, the  roe deer, the wild goat, the ibex, the antelope and the mountain sheep.
There doesn't seem to be a one-to-one correspondence between the animals listed in the two versions, but it would appear that NIV translates it as simply "antelope".  Who here can supply the information about other versions? -- Smjg (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

message: Such as the word is used in English at all (which it isn't) it would be "pygarg" because of the Greek and KJV. Disamb links should be added to possible scientific/latin species names. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dicdef, [[WP:EN]]
Talk:Quotations from the Hebrew Bible in the New Testament

message: Something tells me not.  Especially not Paul, a Pharisee who wrote fourteen of the 27 books in the New Testament and would have primarily used the Hebrew texts.  No way that Peter or John would have, either, or any of the writers that were disciples.  That prejudiced viewpoint favoring the Septuagint has no proof—it implies that Jesus Himself sanctioned the Septuagint without proving such a claim—and must be removed.
71.181.167.62 (talk) 00:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Septuagint quotations?

message: Is there any way I can reference Bible quotes from the Septuagint? Editor2020 (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible quotes from Septuagint 

message: According to both Christina and Jewish Scalars the Septuagint was only written on the 5 books of Moses. Shusly, when the new testament is quotes any of the other 19 books of the old testament is can not be a quote from the Septuagint 50.194.98.209 (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Septuagint was only on the 5 books of Moses
Talk:Raamah

message: This article contains the following weird claim, "We know from the inscriptions of ancient Sheba that Raamah's descendants settled near to the land of Havilah to the east of Ophir." There's absolutely no way this uncited claim matches the understanding of modern historians. Historians don't think the names mentioned in Genesis 10 represent the names of actual historical individuals, but rather that they are ethnic or place names. And I would bet good money there's no "inscriptions of ancient Sheba" that place anyone "near to the land of Havilah to the east of Ophir." 66.209.137.56 (talk) 04:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raamah's descendents
Talk:Rechabites

message: The article currently states "Jonadab or Jehonadab", but are these necessarily the same person?  There are two different names, Jehonadab can be historically traced (per his concurrency with Jehu), but if Jonadab is a different person then he doesn't have any specifics on when his time in history was.  Is there any scholarship to this other than the repeated phrase "son of Rechab"?
:I've removed this wording since it is awkward - Jonadab and Jehonadab are the same person. Thanks for picking it up. Orthogonal1 (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Rephidim

message: I am looking to cite "Died Amalekite" inscription. Perhaps proto-Hebrew inscriptions appeared in Miles Jones The Writing of God. Also Todd Eaton commented on this. (This from  which I am not counting as a reliable source. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Died Amalekite
Talk:Seir

message: The first two say Seir was a name for Sirius not a star in Orion.  And the third makes no reference to Seir.  This of course makes me want an actual source on the Egyptians linking Osiris to Orion, since it seems the Astronomy/Astrology field is filled with a lot of wrong claims.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the three sources for the Biblical Astronomy claim.
Talk:Sela (Edom)

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Sela. Should be 
30°46'17.5"N 35°35'01.1"E
30.771537, 35.583633
—138.16.105.167 (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , but I'm a bit confused. Google Maps does label the location at the coordinates you've given as "As-Sala", and the OpenStreetMap labels it with the Arabic السلع and the symbol for an archaeological site; but OSM also has an archaeological site labeled "Sela" at the coordinates that were formerly in the article. The article describes the location of Sela as "east of Tafileh in Jordan", whereas the new coordinates are southwest of Tafileh. If anyone can resolve this apparent contradiction, I'm sure that it would be appreciated. Deor (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: When I split the text into paragraphs, I applied the "Net" reference to all parts of the initially one long paragraph. I wasn't able to check the source, so this might be wrong. Who can check it up  or edit it based on other sources? No time... Thanks! Arminden (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Net" reference 

message: The article is about TWO topics: the name Sela in the Bible, used for various places or as a common noun; and the one biblical Sela actually identified with an archaeological site, Sela' in Jordan near Tafileh. All elements of the page must reflect this: the infobox, lead (very much so!), section headings, section contents. Arminden (talk) 04:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  One article, two topics. Not just one. We must make it crystal clear to the user.
Talk:Shemaiah

message: I learned there's no alphabet "e,E" in paleo Hebrew, why use it  the names 102.88.35.228 (talk) 12:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hebrew is written with consonants, the vowels were added as diacritic marks much later to enable those for whom Hebrew is not a spoken language pronounce the words. A Georgian (talk) 14:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question of Alphabet
Talk:Sisera

message: In Saudi arabia there is a wall called Sisera wall 
Sisera is well carved in the rock one of the main effects of the region, dating back to the military commander called Canaanite Sisera, who fought against the Jews in Palestine 
The commander of the army of the Canaanites, and mentioned his name in the biblical texts and Christian as an enemy of the Jews. 
And located close to the castle Zaabal, 200 meters in the south-west
http://2z2z.blogspot.com/2010/06/sisera-well_07.html
beside the wall there is a castle Mewoone (talk) 10:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sisera wall and castle in Saudi arabia [[User:Mewoone|Mewoone]] ([[User talk:Mewoone|talk]]) 10:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 

message: Would it be correct to describe Sisera's oppressive rule for 20 years over Israel as being that of a military dictator or governor? I get this impression from the description of his occupation of the land on behalf of King Jabin. Wonder if published Bible scholars have described him as such?Cloptonson (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Military dictator?
Talk:Solomon's Porch

message: The Double Gate and the Triple Gate together are the Huldah Gates. This talk page's subject page has something about the gates. It is a very messy page, but maybe something is useful to be transferred/copied/referenced there. Tomdo08 (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe some material would be useful on page [[Huldah Gates]]
Talk:Song of Ascents

message: While I cannot speak for any other group, Judaism has always referred to these as Song of Ascents, not degrees, steps, or anything else.  I will add that if nobody objects.Tuvia613 (talk) 07:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We've been discussing this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism and going a stage further, towards the conclusion that the article ought to have the title "Songs of Ascents" (with "Songs of Degrees" becoming a redirect). Feline Hymnic (talk) 23:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper name in Judaism
Talk:Tertullus

message: I question Easton's interpretation that Paul "created disturbances among the Romans throughout the empire, an offence against the Roman government (crimen majestatis)". The text of Acts 24:5 refers to "Jews throughout the world". Where does he derive his term crimen majestatis from? BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easton's