lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of works on Waldorf education

message: I know this is nit-picky, but this should be titled "List of works on waldorf education not written by Rudolf Steiner" OR it should include his works. Yes/ No?
:The two lists could indeed be merged...at the moment, the introductory sentence with a link to the Steiner list clarifies the situation, so it could also stay as is...I'd avoid an excessively long title, in any case. Wafflingly, Hgilbert 12:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Saga pedo

message: Saga pedo mentioned in Patrick O'Brian's "The Thirteen Gun Salute"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.223.153 (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So? Is it relevant for encyclopedic treatment of this topic? — Yerpo Eh? 20:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentions
Talk:Schayera baiulus

message: Hi,
I am working on this article for an assignment and I would be grateful for any interaction or help anyone could give me on this! Thank you!
Dreamysharkgirl (talk) 01:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please help with school assignment! 

message: Due to the rarity of the Schayera baiulus, I am having trouble finding a photo is free and on the public domain! I would appreciate anyones help :) Dreamysharkgirl (talk) 06:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trouble finding an image
Talk:Amata, South Australia

message: I have just created a redirect at Amaṯa, South Australia to this article to satisfy some red links. Could someone who knows please advise whether that spelling should be added to this article, should it be moved to that spelling, and/or if that is wrong and the inbound links should be corrected? Thank you. --Scott Davis Talk 21:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  name spelling
Talk:Somatochlora

message: For my/general reference, this is a list of species which do not currently have free-use photos available that I can find:
*Somatochlora calverti (N.A.)
*Somatochlora clavata (Asia)
*Somatochlora daviesi (Asia)
*Somatochlora dido (Asia)
*Somatochlora lingyinensis (Asia)
*Somatochlora ozarkensis (N.A.)
*Somatochlora shanxiensis (Asia)
*Somatochlora shennong (Asia)
*Somatochlora taiwana (Asia)
These species do not have a photo of adequate quality:
*Somatochlora ensigera (N.A.)
Somatochlora (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos needed
Talk:Serbian League Belgrade

message: Looks like we still need to update this page/template for 07/08 season, I just checked the official site  and still seems to not be updated yet. // laughing man 16:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current season 
Talk:Malesia

message: Question from someone who knows nothing about the topic: is there a reason that "Malesia" is spelled differently from "Malaysia"? I assume they are pronounced the same, since they both are partially formed from the word "Malay". -- llywrch 21:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments

message: I changed the hatnote because the terms "Malaysia" and "Malesia" are not alternative spellings of each other in English. The definition for "Malesia" in English does not include Malaysia. You do not use "Malaysia" for "Malesia", and vice versa. Whatever cross-usage of the terms is the result of error.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 08:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote change 

message: According to the article, the original definition of Malesia by WGSRPD included the Bismarcks, but they are quite clearly excluded in the map proposing to illustrate that definition. I don't know how to fix the map-- perhaps someone else could. MayerG (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of WGSRPD version 1 is wrong
Talk:Run London

message: Does anyone know when and where the 2007 run will take place - assuming there is one??
: There's a few Runner's World threads about it (2) but no-one knows yet. They usually only announce it ~8 weeks in advance. I'd be surprised if they skip a year but we're probably looking at another November nocturnal run like 2004. Rup 11:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas, no. The home page now says "So it's a year off for Run London." Rup 17:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 event date? 

message: Not sure how long it's been up?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.152.67 (talk) 08:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone really needs to adjust the 2010 entry...
Talk:Campbell Shopping Complex fire

message: My reading of WP:TRIVIA is that neither a fact (or "interesting facts") section is appropriate under the WP:MOS. Reliable sources discuss these same facts anyways. It should just be written into the article. Pinging  for further views. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't dare revert the edit for the first time after learning about 3RR.  The user has currently been reported for harassing me on my talk page and slight edit warning.  I noticed you have pointed it out.  Thanks for that.  Should we rename the section to trivia?  I saw your edit on the incidents section.  I can support that! :)  If so, we will probably anger the user.  But what do you think?  3primetime3 (talk) 04:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   Whether or not it angers that person is not the issue. I don't know why "Trivia" or "facts" matter. Things like "the incident also highlighted the standards of fire safety in high-rise building ...." and so on aren't trivia, aren't even facts, but are opinion, unsourced opinion by the way. The fact that a movie was out in theaters at the same time isn't even relevant to me, it just sounds silly. Should we add that there was a movie about planes around the time of 9/11 to the 9/11 article as "trivia" or "an interesting fact"? --Ricky81682 (talk) 00:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   I definitely see what you mean.  The entire section is actually unsourced and it sounds opinionated.  I would support you on adding any relevant information onto the top paragraph.  In fact, I could even suggest you on removing the whole thing as it is completely unsourced and looks like it seems a little off topic.  At this point, I really don't care what anyone does to the article :P, but the "Interesting Facts" needs to go.  3primetime3 (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia does not have a mission to educate the public on fire safety. We are an encyclopedia and we summarize whatever reliable sources have written.  If the government's policies on fire safety changed as a result of this disaster maybe you can find something in a WP:Reliable source that documents the change. If you continue to add unsourced material you are likely to be reverted and you are risking sanctions yourself. As a person who works for the government, you should create an account and put something on your user page to explain your role. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts section
Talk:Lauderdale County Tomato Festival

message: It would be helpful to know when the annual festival takes place. Is it at a fixed date that can be mentioned? Like a certain weekend in a certain month? I would find that information helpful for some readers who live in the area.
doxTxob \ talk 00:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: When is the festival?
Talk:Wildlife of Malaysia

message: The last time that I edited out a source somebody got really upset. In this case, footnote 8 is extraordinarily weak, referring to a secondary source which wax not itself properly referenced.  If I get round to it, I will come back to this page in a while and remove it. Nakashchit (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad source 

message: List of animals of Malaysia was proposed for a merge to here last year. I can see why, given that the list is short. Perhaps it is best placed here as a section rather than a stand-alone page. Klbrain (talk) 22:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly short, but I'm not convinced a list fits within the format of this page. Ideally I think, that list would be expanded. Given Malaysia is a megadiverse country, there is surely the scope for a list that's far too long. As an example, there's about a million separate lists of Australian animals. CMD (talk) 01:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 21:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Saint-Simonianism

message: (inserted for readability Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: (random heading)

message: "Prescient madman" said someone, it would be desirable to get a clearer view on:
# who said?
# was that person contemporary with Saint-Simon, with us or somewhen inbetween?
# why? I.e.: what behavior/world-view of Saint-Simon was deemed delusionary/lunatically aberrant?
# what was the proscribed behavior/world-view of the madman-caller?
Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Prescient madman"
Talk:Minim Inc.

message: It conflates Zoom Technologies and Zoom Telephonics, which split from each other in 2009. http://www.zoomtel.com/documentation/investor/20090923_MergerClose.pdfhttp://www.zoomtel.com/documentation/investor/ZSymbol_Release_100609.pdf The original company was called Zoom Technologies, but that name went with the ticker symbol and a fraction of the product lines of the company to the new China-based Zoom, while the core of the original Zoom became the Boston-based Zoom Telephonics. The SEC filing links after that are labeled as Zoom Telephonics, but actually link to the pre-split Zoom Technologies and the post-split Zoom Technologies. The problem is conflated by the fact that other reference sources (e.g. Reuters) share the same confusion. 
I don't have the time (or knowledge) to clean up this botch.
WKCole (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a '''''mess'''''.  

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Zoom Technologies. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 12#Zoom Technologies until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  P,TO 19104  (talk) (contribs)  02:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Zoom Technologies" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An individual that works for the organization has contributed to this article. Currently unclear if they have been compensated for this work. PureRED | talk to me  | 19:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (April 2022) 

message: The domain minim.com is currently in Parked status at GoDaddy.com. This is as of January 4, 2024. Ewm0826 (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domain Minim.com is not live
Talk:Authorship of A Course in Miracles

message: The case was closed. The book is out of print. There is no further copyright. The case received no noticable media attention. So why is this important? Ste4k 13:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: I just nominated this article to be merged with A Course in Miracles (book). I realize that it is consensus that this article should be kept as per two votes. But the first vote, after all, resulted in what was in reality a consensus to merge. I think that since some people are trying to make a more coherent page about A Course In Miracles by merging all of the other articles, this one should be merged as well. Again, strictly speaking, the first consensus was to merge. The Deletrix 04:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a great idea. There are only perhaps two problems with original research in this Authorship version. First, in the first sentence the cited resource says absolutely nothing about the number of languages the book has been translated to.
This article says: "A Course in Miracles (The Course) is a book of spiritual philosophy and practice claimed to have been channeled, or "scribed", by New York psychologist Helen Schucman and first published in 1976. It has since sold over one million copies worldwide and has been translated into over a dozen foreign languages."
The cited source says: "A Course in Miracles,the 1976 three-volume set of books that became a spiritual curriculum for many individuals and study groups. Course remains a cult favorite, retaining a spot above 500 in the Amazon rankings and selling an estimated 1.5 million copies."
Second, this article says: "In 1996, Penguin Books and Foundation for Inner Peace, which at that time asserted copyright later transferred to FACIM, sued ..."
The cited sources of the article to be merged into say: "Judith Skutch Whitson and her husband started the Foundation of Para-Sensory Investigations, Inc. (FPI) in October of 1971. In June of 1976, the Foundation for Parasensory Investigation changed its name to The Foundation of Inner Peace due to Schucman's distaste for the former name. ...control of the copyright was essentially transferred to the Foundation for "A Course in Miracles" (FACIM) in 1983 when it was organized by Wapnick, the Board of Directors being himself, Judy Skutch Whitson, and her husband Robert Skutch. "  
Notice that the dates in the first statement and the word "later" do not align correctly with the sources. Ste4k 05:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge nomination
Talk:Jim Liberman

message: This page is treading on thin ice. It has a single source that no longer exists. Is it worth wayback machine time? here is a possible replacement. http://www.nhra.com/UserFiles/file/NDLiveFiles/Features/Jungle.pdf
I think the page is important enough if someone has the time to research it.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackhammer111 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: possible replacement link

message: I built a 1/8 scale of jungle jim funny car let me know if you would like more on this, can be seen on youtube under Dan Boyle RC Builds. 2603:9001:5700:4D5B:B941:A29B:370:B5D7 (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jungle jim funny car build
Talk:Gahoi

message: I would like to see translated quotations from all of the non-English sources, please. It looks to me as if many of them are not independent and therefore unlikely to be reliable anyway but let's see what shows up. - Sitush (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: I would like to see translated quotations from all of the non-English sources, please. It looks to me as if many of them are not independent and therefore unlikely to be reliable anyway but let's see what shows up. - Sitush (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: Sitush has removed a text with citation with the justification "Raj era sources are not reliable".
This is the source so that you can decide. Note that:
*  It was published in the journal of a  prestigious society:  Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, well known as the Royal Asiatic Society.
* The article was by a highly repsected professor expert in the field: Lorenz Franz Kielhorn 
* The Journal was printed by Cambridge University Press.
* The article includes a photograph, with a very visible inscription.
Further:
* The statue is still in the Horniman Museum.
* You can see a magnificed image of the statue at https://www.horniman.ac.uk/collections/browse-our-collections/object/46331/page/10 Click to magnify.
Further:
* The same inscription is given in "Inscriptions of the Paramāras, Chandēllas, Kachchapaghātas, and two minor dynasties, Part III,
H. V. Trivedi, Archaeological Survey of India, 1978, p. 409"
* There are many other similar inscriptions from the same period from the same region, which are mentioned in collections of inscriptions from the region.
The article removed was: 
Kielhorn, F. “On a Jain Statue in the Horniman Museum.” The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1898, pp. 101–102. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25207937.
It is quite amazing that someone can claim that all "Raj Era sources" (what does that mean?) are unreliable. Malaiya (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of an important source by [[User:Sitush|Sitush]]
Talk:M.O.P./Archive 1

message: I think the M.O.P. page is cleaned up right now. Please state any further (2005-09-22) layout changes and their purpose here. Also, please sign your talk (even if you're not logged in) with ~~~~, it'll datestamp your message. ShotokanTuning 10:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Layout

message: People who think rap degrades women and think all they talk about is sex drugs and violence are stupid their a bunch  fucking idiots
. In their whole career the Mash-Out Posse only had like 3 songs with a sung hook"
: Your babbling,dude. MOP isn't that one dimensional. In ante up Billy Danze saidv, "I put in work in the street like a slave." that's saying something. the number of rappers who can't do that is so underestimated. 
--Pointyfingers 02:36, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's funny though, gangsta rappers always use the word "you," they do yell at youv.  --Poinvdtyfingers 02:45, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  M.O.P. bvusiness concept was to always maintain a strong bond to the streets. A good artist tells you what isv going on in their life,v so "you" can relate, that's whvat's real. ShotokanTuning 09:44, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: If you ask me, "2002 Blakka Blakka Piow - 2002" and "2005 M.O.P. Salutes the St. Marxmen" are mixtapes and not official albums. If I'm right, they should be placed with the other mixtape. Your thoughts? ShotokanTuning 07:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I fixed it. ShotokanTuning 09:17, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixtapes
File talk:World map worlds first second third.gif

message: SCENTIEST 16:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

message: on the map it isn't there.
was hong kong considered first, second or third world during the cold war?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Platinum inc (talk • contribs) 14:01, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 
During the Cold war era, South Korea and Taiwan were considered Third World countries because the countries were developing countries at that time while South Africa was considered First World.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.176.180.188 (talk) 09:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hong kong 

message: Why are Nepal and Bhutan classified as Second World countries?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.140.120.11 (talk) 04:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nepal?!
Talk:Hair highlighting

message: I'm trying to improve the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krashx6 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that the link you're adding isn't a usable source either. - MrOllie (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are you restoring a deadlink over and over again? 

message: How is 'Balayage ' pronounced? Please put that into the article.Kdammers (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Fosfomycin

message: This article certainly warrants some :) There's plenty to go on—a quick PubMed search will reveal plenty of recent and ongoing studies, regarding synergistic effect of combination (most frequently with quinolones), emerging resistance and its mechanisms, and a couple of articles regarding its effect in reducing oto/nephrotoxicity of platinum chemotherapeutics. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This nice free review might help. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: doi:10.1128/CMR.00068-15 JFW | T@lk 22:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:Naraka Chaturdashi

message: Whats with the "on this pee" and "we offer trojans" someone totally messed up this entry but I don't know enough to fix it...
Wizelsnarf (talk) 02:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  this needs cleanup 

message: The date of narak chaturdashi is wrongly stated. It is observed on 14th day of kartik month, insted of Ashwin.--आशीष भटनागर (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two calendric traditions: if you follow purnimanta tradition, Naraka Chaturdashi will fall in kartika; if you follow amanta tradition, Naraka Chaturdashi will fall in Ashwina. Hence both are shown in the info box. Explanation of these traditions can be found  here. You can also check drikpanchang.com. It allows you to switch between the two traditions.  14 Nov 2020 was Naraka Chaturdashi. If you switch between amanta and purnimanta, you will see the masa change between ashwina and kartika. Kishorekumar 62 (talk) 05:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: date
Talk:Freshford, County Kilkenny

message: Hmm Ww....there are already two images on the page. Are you looking for something specific? (Sarah777 22:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Foot odor

message: This is an article about foot odor. An antique artistic painting of a girl removing her socks has very little relevance to the contents.
I request someone to please remove the picture within the next few days, or I will. Thank you.
161.142.96.177 17:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The picture is not appropriate

message: — Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
Talk:Tooth Cave pseudoscorpion

message: This draft contains much more information than the article, and should be rolled into the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: by history-merge. – wbm1058 (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Draft:Tooth Cave pseudoscorpion]] into [[Tartarocreagris texana]]
Talk:End of Course Test

message: I need the actual eoct to print off for class how can I get it
Leslie Phillips
The GA Department of Education will have old versions available on their website, as well as student guides.  Recent versions of the test are protected and not available to the public. Aylad (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  eoct 

message: I left the OR tag up because I didn't personally verify the assertion that "many" states use EOCTs.  I left the date of November 2007 unchanged because I'm unsure of the policy on whether to update tags when we update articles.  However, I removed the Unreferenced tag because I feel that I've added adequate references for the majority of the information. I've not made major edits to many articles, so please leave feedback (especially regarding my references/citations). Aylad (talk) 23:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a reference for the "many states" assertion. Softtest123 (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  added details for Georgia and North Carolina
Talk:Thaumatoneura inopinata

message: The toerreich Teilband reference shows two spp, inopinata and pellucida. Could a reference be found to prove its monotypicity? AshLin (talk) 02:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted the IUCN page shows pellucida to be a synonym. Any other reference available, so to say? AshLin (talk) 02:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monotypic?
Talk:Flox

message: What about flox genes?
: You could add that if you wish too ;) Just edit the page, add an internal link to Flox genes with a short description (like the other links). Then click the red link and make a page about it yourself.--Neglacio (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seems like Wikipedia had already an article about this called Floxed. I added it myself. --Neglacio (talk) 19:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled