lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Isaac Charles Johnson

message: I have deleted the unpunctuated phrase "He supported United" as I suspect a joke. In his youth there were not yet organised football clubs on Tyneside.Cloptonson (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted sentence

message: The above is perhaps not the only joke. Typical of Wikipedia, two mealy-mouthed flags have been added at the top of the article, implying that the article might be inaccurate, but without removing the inaccuracies. There is only one reference for this article, although many more could be cited. In early 2010, an unidentified contributor added a lot of text which is not in any way supported by that reference, or any other. Some statements were simply reversed - for example "Aspdin's product was not protected by an explicit patent" (which, by the way, is true), was replaced with "Aspdin's product was protected by an explicit patent". Now, of course, it's perfectly acceptable to reverse the sense of a key sentence if it is incorrect - provided that an authoritative reference is supplied. The fact that this blatant vandalism has gone unchallenged for ten years says a lot about Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.140.123.62 (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert article to that of 2009?

message: The article says, In 1910 on his 100th birthday, but wouldn't that have been his 99th birthday if he was born in early 1811? I mean, I was born in 1980, and my 10th birthday was in 1990, not 1989. Perhaps it was an early celebration at the end of 1910 rather than on his actual birthday? 85.24.222.227 (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  11+100=110?
Talk:Pectineal line (pubis)

message: The WikiProject classification for Pectineal line (pubis) is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set  on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  18:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Isaac N. Carleton

message: I'm a descendant of Isaac N. Carleton, through his son Walter Tenney Carleton. I started this article based on the listed references which are pretty limited in scope. I identified the references based on Carleton family recollection and records. Most of the references were provided by the Rauner Special Collections Library at Dartmouth College. Isaac N. Carleton had two daughters, Clara and Grace. Grace married Forrest F. Dryden, son of New Jersey Senator John F. Dryden. It's possible that the dependents of Grace Dryden may have more material
If anyone else can add references, I'll incorporate them into the article.
Rbcwa (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional References
Talk:Crudia zeylanica

message: a lot of this article could use clarification, such as when the plant was even rediscovered. i dont know much about the plant (i just fixed up some grammatical issues in the article) but if anyone could make this article clearer that would be nice. (im still very new to wikipedia so this may not be where i should put this, if not im sorry) -Mindofthebrick Mindofthebrick (talk) 16:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  information regarding practically everything 

message: in my hometown there stood a tree that known by many as a narra tree, but upon my observation when I saw the seeds underneath the huge tree and the seed pods still on the branches, I rethink because I know what's the narra seeds like. Arkingel (talk) 10:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  i saw a tree that look like this
Talk:Cynometra beddomei

message: The file :c:File:Cynometra beddomei.jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: Cynometra beddomei is considered to be extinct since 1870s. The leaves of Cynometra beddomei were 2,5-3,5 long x 1-1,5 cm wide. The pinnate leaves on this picture are definitely bigger. An identification of this plant is not possible without flowers. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -JamuthiraR (talk) 06:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons 

message: The file :c:File:Cynometra beddomei.jpg has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: Cynometra beddomei is considered to be extinct since 1870s. The leaves of Cynometra beddomei were 2,5-3,5 long x 1-1,5 cm wide. The pinnate leaves on this picture are definitely bigger. An identification of this plant is not possible without flowers. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 08:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons
Talk:Isaak Brodsky

message: It says on the article that Brodsky was born in a village called Sofiyevka, which is fair enough, but it links to a park not a village. Djamorpheus 14:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to have been corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.192.125 (talk) 12:15, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace  
Talk:Isabel Bassett Wasson

message: Isebel basset Wasson should have more information 2600:100B:B130:438:F500:11E3:4ED:1361 (talk) 00:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Isabel Bishop

message: In this period, women were becoming very active in the arts community, yet were still taken for granted. Bishop pushed against this attitude toward women artists with her insistence on applying herself both academically and politically in the art realm.
:Not sure what's meant by 'taken for granted' in this context. Could you clarify? Valetude (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in the art world
Talk:Russell Jacoby

message: Pretty clear why they gave him a "folding chair": He hasn't earned a real one, yet behaves as if his pedestrian scholarship entitles him to defile the corpses of truly important thinkers. What a sad tool.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.187.74.68 (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS is the guy who attacked Hannah Arendt?!? 

message: Before I deleted it, the article included the sentence, "He belongs to the American Historical Association."  I don't see how this is the least bit extraordinary or worthy of inclusion in his Wikipedia encyclopedia entry.  According to the AHA, there are 14,000 individual and 4,000 institutional members.  Being a history professor and not belonging to the AHA is more noteworthy than being a history professor and an AHA member.
Meanwhile, the article says almost nothing substantive about his life beyond facts that can be learned from his c.v. and/or his department website.  Where is the genuine biographical information? Poldy Bloom (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  AHA Membership
Talk:Isabel Paterson

message: Ayn Rand consciously "owed an intellectual debt" only to one person, and that was Aristotle. It's true that Rand admired Paterson's work for a period of time, but Rand didn't necessarily "learn" anything from her.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.74.164 (talk) 03:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "intellectual debt" 
Talk:Isabel Nicholas

message: The first reference to Francis Bacon points to Francis_Bacon_painter, whose article doesn't mention isabel Rawsthorne and in fact makes clear that this Francis Bacon is extremely unlikely to have had any sexual encounters with women.  The second reference points to the sixteenth-century Bacon, who is even more unlikely to have been intimate with Isabel Rawsthorne.  There is no other Francis Bacon listed on the disambiguation page who could possibly be the one mentioned here.  What's going on? C. Cerf (talk) 13:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francis Bacon
Talk:Isabel Thorne

message: Lots of details of DOB of her, her husband and her children on this link: http://www.findmypast.com/CensusHouseholdSearchServlet?uir=ed1b4f53c069f6f35af91cf2b3487eed&lineNo=2&lineNoSuffix=0&UIRStamp=1a224c876e004bd096de603eaed6256feea0b491db03610a58ec0160d6411bc75e5f8418f19b5123&pagetype=6
Sorry for large link. It is a census typescript of 1881. Unwisely (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Life details
Talk:Isabella Stewart Gardner

message: Why just trash the section and not edit out the troublesome material? jmswtlk (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The suspect material was brought in by Soissons03 in Feb 2011. Bringing back the material prior to that. jmswtlk (talk) 21:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage and family 

message: I'm pretty sure the Isabella Gardner Poetry Award was named for ISG's niece of that name.  How come you don't have an entry for her?  You barely mention her on Allen Tate's page as one of his wives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be willing to write one? Please see Wikipedia:Articles for creation or contact me on my talk page. Station1 (talk) 03:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poetry award NOT named for her
Talk:Ischiopubic ramus

message: The first graphic's text reads, "...Ischiopubic ramus is region between "3" and "4c", but in the graphic this region appears to be an opening in the pelvis.
And the Gray's Anatomy graphic needs the text that refers to the ir redone so it's readable, and perhaps an arrow pointing to it.
173.210.125.42 (talk) 11:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear graphics
Talk:Pelvic inlet

message: "The pelvic brim is an approximately apple-shaped line passing through the prominence of the sacrum, the arcuate and pectineal lines, and the upper margin of the pubic symphysis" For starters, what is a line that is "apple-shaped"? Surely the author of this article could have consulted a medical dictionary.  The main illustration for the article has text on it that is in tiny, illegible script, and does not help at all in comprehending the writing, which references several obscure anatomical terms. What is the medical significance of the concept of the pelvic inlet? Low utility value article.--75.164.155.194 (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very confusing article
Talk:Pelvic brim

message: Is this necessary: "an approximately mickey mouse head shaped"? Seems like a weirdly pop culture reference for something that is otherwise a scientific description.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chyken (talk • contribs) 14:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Chyken! Frankly, describing the shape as "Mickey Mouse head-shaped" is accurate, and it would be difficult to describe it in other ways. However, I cannot find any scientific literature that makes a similar pop-culture description. Bibeyjj (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mickey Mouse Head Shape
Talk:Pelvic outlet

message: "The lower circumference of the lesser pelvis is very irregular..."
Irregular compared to what? 
I understand that "irregular" is commonly used in the description , but it seems a bit subjective. 
Annnnddd, the reason I'm not fixing it myself is because I don't have a clue. >.> MichaelExe (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irregular?
Talk:Triratna Buddhist Community/Archive 3

message: I somehow managed to misplace previous talk page.  I can't find it. I appreciate if someone can help me. FWBOarticle
: Please..... FWBOarticle
::I'm working on it. DES (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored what I can. it looks like discussions, if any, from 7 December 2005 up to 26 Janurary 2006 may have been lost. See User talk:FWBOarticle#Misplaced archive for more details. DES (talk) 17:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive Problems

message: Vapour says above: 'once the policies of wikipedia has been explained to them, [the FWBO] left the criticism section alone.'
This no longer seems to be the case, they seem to have changed some of the criticism section, without first explaining their changes on the Talk page. For example, 'To read more about how the FWBO-Files distorts the truth go to [7]' (which seems clearly POV) has been added at the end of the criticism section. At the time of writing this, at the end of the article, it says 'This page was last modified 09:12, 5 December 2006' whereas at the end of the Talk page, it says 'This page was last modified 07:22, 6 November 2006.'
That seems a bit naughty to me. I would propose simply deleting that change.
There seem to be other furtive changes to the criticism section, but that will do for now. EmmDee 16:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Opps, sorry. I didn't see your comment. A statement like "'To read more about how the FWBO-Files distorts the truth go to..." is such an blatant example of NPOV violation that I simply deleted as a vandalism. Moreover, statement like that tend to alarm rather than reassure people. Vapour
By the way, editing without "explanation" is  a violation of policies/guidelines. Editing withour prior discussion is not. Otherwise, editing would simply stop if no one bother to respond. Vapour
I take your point. I was just thinking that, in the case of a controversial topic, it may be sensible to both provide an explanation, and also to allow a period of time for others to respond (to agree or disagree) before making any changes (except in cases of blatant POV). To do otherwise might be to invite an edit war. EmmDee 00:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing without prior discussion 

message: Have started new verifiability section as earlier one has grown a bit long. The problem remains that most of the FWBO article doesn't have verifiable source. Have started adding [citation needed] tags to unsourced/unverifiable material. EmmDee 15:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability (part II)
Talk:Cynometra ulugurensis

message: A cacao plant has a certain flower. known as Silk plant flowers. porcellaine flowers.
Well this is one of the species of Cacao??
lookat the flowers and tell me if it belongs to the Silk flower group.
Iff it does.   Extracts of flower itself for perfume.  or  extract of Seed skin. not seed itself. for a juice. compare the white substance in  cacao seeds. but no experience. 
some of them seem to have black  spherical  fruits. Is a strange fruit. they don't want to tell its probably cacao family.   Why?  Guess they try hiding true origin of cacao Wikistallion (talk) 20:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cacao...
Talk:Gold dust robbery

message: The article only gives the value. When someone is stealing and disposing of gold, it is interesting to know the weight of the metal. Measuringworth.com says that in 1839 one "fine ounce of gold" had a value in London of £4.25. The stolen gold thus weighed about 1082 fine ounces. A fine ounce is defined as "a troy ounce of 99.5% (".995") pure gold." The article does not state the fineness of the gold. The "international troy ounce is equal to about 31.103 476 grams" or .0311 kilogram, so the stolen gold would have weighed about 33.65 kilogram. One person could have lifted it. Edison 23:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quantity of gold 

message: The quotations listed as a weekness in this article actually provide key insight and context to the story and therefor are valuable within this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjn1999 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotations
Talk:Tokyo Journal

message: I can't find any information online to back this up, but I recall that the magazine was sold as "Japan Journal" (with otherwise identical covers and contents) outside Japan, certainly in the late 1980s. If anyone has more concrete information, it would be useful to add to this article. --DAJF (talk) 13:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now added with source in this edit. Also created Japan Journal as a redirect to this article. --DAJF (talk) 08:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Japan Journal

message: The Japan Times article cited () clearly states that Don Morton was the magazine's first editor-in-chief, but another knowledgeable editor claims that this is incorrect, so the statement has been removed for the moment to allow him/her or someone else to provide a source verifying who was actually the first editor. --DAJF (talk) 08:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First editor-in-chief
Talk:Isidor Sadger

message: From INTERNATIONAL  DICTIONARY  OF  PSYCHOANALYSIS (2005), p. 1525: "He may have written a biography of Freud but the manuscript has never been found." 
So what about "Sigmund Freud. Persönliche Erinnerungen", published 1929 by Ernst Wengraf Verlag, Wien - Leipzig - Berlin, see copy at https://archive.org/details/sadger-1929-freud? 
English translation published 2005 by The University of Wisconsin Press under the title "Recollecting Freud", edited by
Alan Dundes, translated by Johanna Micaela Jacobsen and Alan Dundes.
Should that not be mentioned in the article? 2A02:908:2810:8780:301E:F45E:EF8C:3360 (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His biography of Freud
Talk:Dalbergia bariensis

message: This species has now been determined a synonym as in POWOPlants of the World Online (retrieved 8 October 2020) Roy Bateman (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merging. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Isidore Konti

message: for information on the  Home Life Insurance Building, supposedly with work on it by Konti.  It does not show up - or I have not yet found it, in The Known Works of Isidore Konti or in Kvaran & Lockley's monumental A Field Guide to Architectural Sculpture in the United States, so am parking it here until such time as a reference shows up.  Then will cheerfully return it to the article. Carptrash (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am looking
Talk:Dalbergia baronii

message: I think this is actually a type of rosewood timber. As in it's a tree, not a legume as the article states. See the reference linked by the article 66.234.242.102 (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Dalbergia cambodiana

message: This species has now been determined a synonym as in POWOPOWORoy Bateman (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Dalbergia cochinchinensis

message: D. cambodiana has now been determined a synonym of this species as in POWO.POWO Roy Bateman (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge report
Talk:Ithell Colquhoun

message: The article currently says that Colquhoun married del Renzio in 1940; this isn't cited so it's hard to tell the source.  Matthew Gale's biography on the Tate's website () says they married in 1942; the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography and Desmond Morris' recent book The British Surrealists both say 1943 – Morris says they only met in 1942!  Which is correct, and what is the source for the 1940 date? Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 11:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ithell Colquhoun and Toni del Renzio were married in 1943. The England & Wales civil registry marriage index states 1943, listed in July, August, September index. Sourced from Ancestry.com 80.1.28.234 (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ithellcolquhoun.co.uk also says July 1943, and that they had not yet met in January 1942.  I've changed the article to reflect this; looks like the 1940 date is just plain wrong. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 13:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Colquhoun's marriage?
Talk:Leica M8

message: Who's idea was it to call it that, thats crazy?!
: Presumably it follows the Leica M7 (which suggests that they do not plan to design any more M-series film cameras, otherwise it would have been more sensible to call the M8 the Leica D8 or M7D or something similar). Alternatively, it could be text-speak for "mate", in which case the camera is the Leica Mate. That would imply that Leica has a sense of humour; I don't think they do. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  M8? 
Talk:Atlanto-axial joint

message: Um, this article's opening statement does nothing to define what the Atlanto-axial joint is.  
It describes that "it is complicated and has no less than four parts," 
but it does not even state clearly what part of the body this article is talking about.  
DOES IT SAY ANYWEHERE THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SPINE?!?!  
The word "SPINE" is used only ONCE in this entire article 
and late in the article in reference to paralysis, but having nothing to do with the definition of what the atlantoaxial joint is.  
It should be stated both in Anatomical/Kinesiological Terms AND LAYMEN TERMS!  
Is it the first 2 vertebrae in the spine that connects to the SKull (or cranium)??    
The opening statement should be a definition first stated clearly and understandably to all people not just doctors.  
After the opening statement... THEN the descriptions,explanations,& details of the subject. 
67.188.222.133 (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

message: Should we get rid of the dash? It is spelled "atlantoaxial" without the dash everywhere else. IIIBALESIII 16:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlantoaxial vs atlanto-axial
Talk:Ivan Eklind

message: Hi. This article requires better references in order to verify some of the claims and statements within it. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 14:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Atlanto-occipital joint

message: This neglected article is better placed in the joint it relates to Tom (LT) (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 15:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[:Capsule of atlantooccipital articulation]] into [[:Atlanto-occipital joint]]
Talk:Ivan Joseph Martin Osiier

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20041021021746/http://www.jewsinsports.org/olympics.asp?sport=olympics&ID=73. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed