Talk:KMYS

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Not moved WhiteNight T | @ | C 04:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First move attempt

message: The reasons for move copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
* Talk:KRRT-TV — KRRT-TV → KRRT — According to the FCC, KRRT lacks a -TV suffix. --   02:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Oppose. Move to KRRT (TV) to be consistent with Radiojon's rules about how radio and TV station articles are to be titled based on their callsigns. Other meanings of KRRT (not restricted to callsigns) might be revealed by a Google search (not necessarily at this moment; even if nearly all results are for the TV station, this might change soon.) 66.32.148.106 20:37, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
Source for KRRT lacking a -TV suffix: KRRT in the FCC TV station database --   02:26, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
I wish I would have seen this as both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names are in consensus on this topic. The article name should be the call sign of the station. If there needs to be a disambig page, such as when more than one station uses the call sign the page should be named in this case KRRT (TV). I will renominate this move as it should be a no-brainer. —A 06:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to KRRT (TV). —Nightstallion (?) 13:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add any additional comments
Source for KRRT lacking a -TV suffix: KRRT in the FCC TV station database --   02:26, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
I wish I would have seen this as both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names are in consensus on this topic. The article name should be the call sign of the station. If there needs to be a disambig page, such as when more than one station uses the call sign the page should be named in this case KRRT (TV). I will renominate this move as it should be a no-brainer. —A 06:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to KRRT (TV). —Nightstallion (?) 13:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: *Support, KRRT Per nomination and comments. —A 06:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting (2)

message: I have proposed that the KRRT TV Tower article should be merged with this one. They are both stubs and the tower article really has no information on it that would make it enough for an article of its own. Unless someone can expand either (or both) of these articles I think they should be merged.Tartan 16:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- AlexDW 22:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: :Image:Sanantonioswb.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sanantonioswb.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on KMYS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified