Talk:Pinguicula moranensis

message: *I'm with Hesperian--I think somebody probably asked you to include in-line references in the introduction, but I've changed my mind on this.  I don't like them, especially multiples for single statements.  One or two for something not handled below is fine.
*"Pinguicula moranensis is a perennial rosette-forming insectivorous herb native to Mexico and Guatemala.[3]"
**Include the family in the introductory sentence of botanical articles in general, imo, because this is how botanists discuss plants, even horticulturists and agronomists and farmers do this.  Even though it states it in the taxobox.  I think it should also say "seasonally dimorphic" or in English the same thing in the introduction, if not the first sentence, soon.
***There really isn't a way to fit the family classification into the introductory sentences without making them awkward or unreadable for the lay person. Furthermore, since the info is already presented in the taxobox, I don't think it is that important in the intro (this isn't a scientific publication, so not all the same rules apply). None of the other plant or even TOL (afaik) FA's have mentioned the family name in the intro. The intro already states that the plant states that the plant is seasonally dimorphic by listing the different seasonal growth forms.--NoahElhardt 05:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC lead section 

message: One of the captions for the flowers  says that morphology is variable-- this should be
'shape', morphology would be parts, like one flower having petals and another not having
petals. Hardyplants 20:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always understood the word morphology to deal with the form of an organ or organism, rather than the number or type of its parts. Several definitions I have looked up, including the WP definition (morphology_(biology)), agree. --NoahElhardt 00:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morphology 

message: Shouldn't the tips on cultivation be removed? See: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate colleection of information", point 4. Kind of surprising that they're in this article considering it's featured. Kotare 08:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they shouldn't. It passed FAC without any objections. Mgiganteus1 08:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah but I thought it could have been added afterwards.. I dunno.. whether the content in these sort of cultivation sections is "how to" content is a pretty subjective judgement but ultimately I guess if it really was inappropriate content for wikipedia it wouldn't be in a featured article. Cheers, Kotare 02:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "How to" content

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Pinguicula moranensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318020735/http://www.carnivorousplants.org/cultivars/pincult.html to http://carnivorousplants.org/cultivars/pincult.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090402084219/http://www.humboldt.edu/~rrz7001/Pinguicula.html to http://www.humboldt.edu/~rrz7001/Pinguicula.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pinguicula moranensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610120415/http://www.ecologia.edu.mx/publicaciones/resumeness/ABM/ABM.49.1999/acta49(23-34).pdf to http://www.ecologia.edu.mx/publicaciones/resumeness/ABM/ABM.49.1999/acta49(23-34).pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified