lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:IPKat

message: This article needs to be rewritten slightly, for example moving the links into an External Websites / References section and made easier to read, in my opinion. I added the Website Infobox, which needs a screenshot. Poeloq 13:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Are there only two authors? What's the exact meaning given to "authors" here? Don't get it. --Edcolins 18:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two creators (Jeremy and Ilanah), but currently 4 authors, i.e. those who write for the IPKat.  Any doubts are easily verified by accessing the blog itself.  Pearcedh 14:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, please do not add misleading information in the article, thanks ;) (See ... you added that there were only two authors). --Edcolins 18:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Oops, sorry. I have just noticed that the label "author=" in :Template:Infobox Website becomes "Created by" on the page... That explains the confusion. I have removed the tag "[dubious – discuss]". --Edcolins (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authors 

message: This term appears in the final paragraph. Is this correct?
82.211.95.178 (talk) 09:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think so. See Blawg. --Edcolins (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Blawgs" 
Talk:Tansy Davies

message: This is to confirm that the text I recently submitted is not copyright to Faber Music Ltd as you suggest. Yes, it is on our site (I am an employee) but is freely available for anyone to use.
I have resent an email to you as requested.
This conforms with the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
I hope you can now reelase it to the site.
Yours
Tim Brooke
Harmony-Twitchell 13:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've done a rewrite on this page, but left the Multiple Issues/Notability tag for someone else to judge.  DJRafe (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page revisions
Talk:Simulation hypothesis

message: In the lead we have this sentence: . The first one is cited to a Blogspot URL, and appears to be the personal opinion of the person mentioned. The second one, likewise, looks like a PowerPoint slide deck of lecture notes, and not an actual publication. While the opinions of these people seem reasonable to me (and surely the people themselves know what they're talking about), are we sure that these are appropriate citations? jp×g 23:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Those should both fall within WP:RSOPINION, since they're both notable people and they're talking about the hypothesis and not Bostrom himself.  - car chasm (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blog post and PowerPoint lecture notes in lead? 

message: The section on parsimony and brains it vats is essentially a summary of one preprint by Lorenzo Pieri. It is the only publication by him on the subject, and he cannot be considered an expert in this field. It is unclear why the opinions stated by Pieri in his preprint are relevant to the article. Furthermore, the current section does not give what I consider to be a full picture of the arguments in the preprint. I have tried removing the section, in disconcordance with  (see ). I have therefore now edited that section  to remove original research. Feedback is welcome here on the talk page. --Maximilian Janisch (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most of your removals are for the better (there is a lot of crap in this article). I do think that the brain in a vat should be mentioned somewhere, though, since it seems like an obviously analogous thought experiment (about which the arguments for and against would seem to be quite similar as well). jp×g 21:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with you and I have added a sentence added two sentences. (I would've liked to add a bit more but I find it personally quite difficult to write on this type of subject without starting to generate Geschwurbel.) --Maximilian Janisch (talk) 23:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Other uses in philosophy"  

message: there could be a distinction between dreams and reality. when we dream, we do not remember reality. when we are awake, however, we remember the dream.
49.37.195.208 (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  dream hypothesis 

message: :No error correction is perfect, and at some point of complexity, error correction algorithms cause more mistakes because they have problem to manage needlessly huge chunks of data.
I'd fix that, if I knew what it was supposed to mean. Anyone? – AndyFielding (talk) 20:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes sense to me Coltcatus (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This can't be right—but what is?
Talk:Metropolis (Metropolis song)

message: The track list info in this article is the original single release I will add the additional track listing for the 2007 re-release on their fsoldigital download centre. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 20:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Listing

message: I don't know why this random song has its own Wikipedia page. It isn't notable enough for that. I think someone was a fan of this band and decided to make a Wikipedia page about this song that they liked from that band. It should ideally be deleted.  Scipioafricanus12 (talk) 09:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be deleted
Template talk:DART LB

message: This template is for all DART Downtown Dallas routes numbered from 1-185, local/suburban routes numbered in the 300s and crosstown routes numbered in the 400s.
Examples: , , 
As of January 24, 2022, this template should be used for routes numbered from 1-251 and the shuttle routes in the 400s and 800s.--yuor faec (talk) 23:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Georgios Christakis-Zografos

message: Permission has been given to reproduce text from  Phantis. Permission can be shown on request.
Regards,
Philhellenism 13:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Article
Talk:Anthony Durante

message: I added some information on what I could.  No we need to start adding more of his career.  Mr. C.C. 05:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Career Information

message: Were the two small children mentioned dead as well? The structure of the paragraph doesn't really make it clear. User:PHX606 01:27 22 July 2008 (UTC)
The children were found alive. They were taken in by a family member, where they still are today.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.17.85 (talk) 05:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: The following external link didn't belong in the section per WP:EL but it may contain some info used in citing the article, if anybody wants to build it up.
* 
:ThemFromSpace 03:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ELs 
Talk:Shaba I

message: The article says "Jimmy Carter ... maintained that there was no evidence of Cuban involvement". But he did say at a press conference Apr. 22 '77 "Our best information is that the Katangans have been trained within Angola by the Cubans. We have no direct evidence at all that there are Cubans within Zaire", quoted in Gleijeses "Visions of Freedom" p. 41. Does training constitute involvement? The article might convey the feeling that Carter stoutly maintained Cuban non-involvement while actually he overstated the Cuban role: the Cubans did not provide the training as claimed.
85.165.132.24 (talk) 03:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carter's claim of Cuban training, worth pointing out?
Talk:Fall of Kampala

message: *39 years after war that brought down Amin Daily Monitor
*How Mbarara, Kampala fell to Tanzanian army
*Aspects of Amin’s life that you missed New Vision
*Ugandans go on a looting spree The Guardian
-Indy beetle (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources 

message: The phrasing in the article "In late March Ugandan opposition groups met in Moshi. They elected Yusuf Lule chairman of the Uganda National Liberation Front (UNLF) and established a cabinet.[11] The next day President Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, an ally of Amin, attempted to stem the advance by sending an ultimatum to Nyerere ..." is a bit awkward, as it's not clear which day the "next day" is, with the antecedent only being "late March."
I did a little searching around, and the Moshi Conference seems to have been March 23 or 24 through March 26https://mobile.monitor.co.ug/-numbers-Moshi-Conference-Odoki-Commission-Pigeon-Hole/691260-4262306-format-xhtml-9j8wqt/index.html. Nyerere announced he had received the ultimatum on March 27Politics and Violence in Eastern Africa: The Struggles of Emerging States, page 162. With this being the featured article today, I'm not going to try inserting the dates now, but think it would help it read more smoothly, even if the specific dates aren't that important in the larger scheme of things. Mahousu (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to "Shortly thereafter" for now. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimatum date 

message: I'm not saying it's a vital issue, but the reasons why I amended "Government" to lower case are that a) there were already lowercase usages of the word in the article, in such similar forms as "The successful formation of the UNLF government" and "A new Ugandan government was established by the UNLF", and b) the thoughts expressed in this article, which seem to indicate that at the very least there is no consensus on the subject. Harfarhs (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't feel strongly about it either, it's just that whenever this issues shows up at Milhist ACR someone lobbies for it to be capitalised. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper noun
Category talk:Gminas of Poland

message: Well, what we can see in Polish gminas. For example: Gmina Grunwald, but Gmina of Ostrówek, and even Brzozów Commune. Can we keep any standard? I'd like to propose: Gmina Xxxx, instead of "Gmina of Xxxx" or "Xxxx Commune" for all Polish gminas. Lajsikonik 13:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and am trying to tidy up some of the gmina-related pages on that basis.--Kotniski 17:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: In fact I feel that in principle, all articles titled Xxx Commune should be moved (renamed) to Gmina Xxx - then at least we would have some uniformity.--Kotniski 20:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Any rules there?

message: I'm in the process of moving all Gmina/Commune articles to the subcategories, again to achieve some kind of uniformity. So see under the subcategories for more articles.--Kotniski 09:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategories

message: OK, here's a list of my proposals for these articles:
# Articles about gminas should be named Gmina Xxx (with the exceptions below).
# Where there are two identically named gminas, they should be distinguished using the tag , Zzz Voivodeship (using , Yyy County instead only if the voivodeship tag would still leave ambiguity). This is in line with what is done for towns and villages, but for some reason gminas are done differently at present (always using Yyy County to disambiguate).
# Create 16 subcategories of this Category:Gminas of Poland entitled "Gminas of Zzz Voivodeship" (this also being a subcategory of Category:Zzz Voivodeship), and put the Gmina Xxx articles (and articles on towns which are gminy miejskie??) into those, instead of the present categories Urban/Urban-Rural/Rural gminas of Poland. (this is being done)
And of course someone should write a bot to import all the articles from Polish Wikipedia...:)
--Kotniski 18:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems good and consistent to me. I support this proposal. As for the gmina/comune issue, I support gmina. It is ok to use original naming, english wikipedia has already in use several other original non-english names, as "oblasts" for Russia. - Darwinek 20:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I also think Gmina is preferable to Commune because while it is a foreign word, it doesn not give any misleading impressions like Commune can. The word Commune is used literally in several European countries for their smallest administrative subdivisions, but these are usually smaller than the Polish Gminas, corresponding to a single "community" (hence the name). For example in France which I'm familiar with, a Commune is equivalent to a single town or vilage, while in Poland it almost always contains several well-spaced, and not necessarily especially related villages. Deuar 17:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposals...

message: * :Category:Gminas of Poland to :Category:Municipalities of Poland – C2C :Category:Municipalities, C2D Municipalities of Poland https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Poland.aspx TerraCyprus (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed speedy move request
Talk:Tom Ford (presenter)

message: Removed proposed deletion and added some basic content.  I'm an American and the only time I see Tom Ford is on Five's Fifth Gear, but I know that he is at least somewhat notable for that and his editor status for Top Gear Magazine.  Hopefully a Brit can help flesh this out. --dinomite 14:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blue County (duo)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Blue County (music group) →  – The act was a duo, and "duo" is an acceptable modifier per Trout Fishing in America (duo), Love and Theft (duo), et al. Note that if moved, the categories for songs, albums, and members should be CFDS'd too. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Ping , , , , and other relevant editors. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds appropriate. I second the name change. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

text:  Support Per nom. Artist is duo, not a group. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 January 2023
Talk:Provisional Government of Northern Epirus

message: Once some information can be obtianed on the Northern Epirus Government, and article will be created.
Regards,
Φilhellenism 14:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More Information

message: The article has to be expanded and much information schould be added. I have enough material, but I believe a most appropriate title would be 'Autonomous Republic of Northern Epirus', which was the region's official name according to the declaration of autonomy.--Alexikoua (talk) 08:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Midnight Lightning

message: How does one know that this is just a UK chronology? More importantly, how is the reader expected to know? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album release chronology
Talk:Crystal Castles

message: First sentence, Crystal Castles *is* a group. Group is singular. Verb agrees with noun, unless they changed the English language since last I looked. It seems to be protected, can someone fix ? 116.231.75.71 (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  fix grammar, please 

message: Check the Wikipedia pages on disambiguation. The band itself claims it got its name from the cartoon She-Ra: Princess of Power (I find no way to verify this is actually how they got their name, given their ages and the brief life of the cartoon). AFAIK, that cartoon derived ITS term from the video game Crystal Castles (1983). It should either link to the 1983 Video Game or (probably more appropriate) a disambiguation page. Especially given the fact that Wikipedia claims it wants to be(!) family-friendly (and children read this, though they really shouldn't be using it) and this band's music is (how do I put this nicely when I don't want to?) really messed up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WholeInWon (talk • contribs) 04:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be listed from the disambiguation page as Crystal Castles (band), NOT as the default 

message: in which way crystal castles is lofi????--181.43.107.33 (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  this don't make sense 

message: Seeing as the band gained newfound popularity with Gen Z on social media, should it possibly be mentioned? Many of their famous and less famous songs have picked up popularity on platforms like Tiktok, possibly bringing the music to it's peak popularity even compared to when the band was active ChenV99 (talk) 10:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You would have to provide sources. Flowerkiller1692 (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy / Post-breakup popularity
Talk:Republic of the Congo Civil War (1997–1999)

message: I'm not sure that this article's current title ("Second Republic of the Congo Civil War") is really viable. I cannot find any WP:RS that uses this terminology to describe the conflict. I suggest a much neater solution would be to retitle this Republic of the Congo Civil War (1997–99) and retitle the other Republic of the Congo Civil War (1993). The page Republic of the Congo Civil War would become a disambig page. Does anyone object? —Brigade Piron (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Mignonette (album)

message: The following were from the AfD:
Here's what a few minutes of searching turns up: Substantive review in Paste.  Substantive coverage in a syndicated Knight Ridder article. . A paragraph about the album in a concert preview in The Washington Post .  Some useful content about the album in a concert review from Indy Week.    Material about the album in a book by the photographer.   Numerous mentions of this album as one of the band's better ones in reviews of later work, and articles about the band, e.g.  and more.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources
Talk:Miles & Monk at Newport

message: The article claims his performance was "April 1963".  Isn't it known to be July 3, 1963?  Where is this data from?  This should be addressed in the article.  I'm presuming the date was wrong in the original release. Sojambi Pinola (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Monk Performance
Talk:Jacaranda mimosifolia

message: perhaps the color of the flower is not blue, but indigo [unsigned]
:I'd agree that indigo would be a better term to use in this article. It's more precise than "blue," which doesn't seem to accurately capture the color of the tree to my eyes. If a third person agrees on this point, please implement the change. - Sdkb (talk) 09:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I too would agree.  But a the risk of being pedantic, indigo is a deeper darker richer colour and is the second last colour in a rainbow.  Is a better description "pale indigo"?  Aoziwe (talk) 17:26, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, not only for the pedantic reason given by Aoziwe, but also because the indigo article itself does not support this usage. The indigo article shows indigo dye, and darker blues and purples, which means anyone clicking on the link, or hovering with a cursor, will be get confusing, misleading information about the actual color of the flowers. Either Lavender_(color) or Periwinkle_(color) would be a better choice, as both common usage and their Wikipedia articles describe a much-closer-to-jacaranda-flowers range of colors. Jusuwa (talk) 01:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm?  On reflection, given Indigo#Distinction among the four major tones of indigo, I perhaps agree.  Lavender_(color) as you suggest is probably better, which by the way to my eye is pale indigo!  Either way to my eye it is definitely not blue.  Regards.  Aoziwe (talk) 10:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color of the tree 
Talk:Montage (Kenny G album)

message: My copy of this is dated 1990. Drutt 00:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Year
Talk:Historic Performances Recorded at the Monterey International Pop Festival

message: — Assignment last updated by Trevmo34 (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CALIFORNIA DREAMING, THE GOLDEN STATE'S RHETORICAL APPEALS
Talk:More Fire

message: This is the second "seventh studio album" by this artist. See One Mission (Capleton album). Emeraude (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Seventh???

message: Cf. The Album credits, the 45 (or 7").  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toophunkt (talk • contribs) 17:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sizzla is not on jah-jah city. Cf. The Album credits, the 45 (or 7").
Talk:More Music for Films

message: This comment was by an anonymous IP User:86.163.21.11:
NOTE: This page mistakenly considers More Music for Films and Music for Films Volume 2 to be the same album. The entries on the 'Discogs' website clearly explain the following:
Music for Films Volume 2 was only ever issued in 1983 as part of the boxed set Working Backwards.
More Music for Films is a compilation issued for the first time in 2005. It includes several previously released tracks but only 7 from Music for Films Volume 2
It's not my post, but I think it's something that should be investigated. SectorSweep (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that this long-standing confusion between the two albums should be resolved. I've removed the misplace material from the current article, so that the current article contains only information on More Music for Films. Note that the merge proposal is still open. Klbrain (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "More Music for Films" different from "Music for Films 2"? 

message: I propose that this article be merged with Music for Films Volume 2. FamblyCat94 (talk) 05:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: only 7 of 21 tracks on More Music for Films are from Music for Films Volume 2, so suggest that merging them isn't appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Music for Films Volume 2]]
Talk:My Name Is Joe (album)

message: Citation  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.29.246.194 (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Captain Z-Ro

message: based on recent viewing [mill creek dvd], i believe that ZX-99 was the designation of cap'n z-ro's rocket ship, 
not his time travel machine.  david lund, dLLund@usfamiLy.net, 20120222  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.33.13 (talk) 00:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  re ZX-99 
Talk:De Klassieker

message: Nothing wrong with this page. I've replaced all the sponsor names in the competition (Holland Casino etc) by just plain "eredivisie" like we use in Holland.JacobHdk 14:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Why were those playoff matches necessary? Feyenoord won twice,but they didn't participate in the 1960-61 European Cup.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.153.63 (talk) 13:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1960 Playoff matches 

message: Peter Houtman played for Feyenoord not for Ajax (List of top scorers). --DrJos (talk) 10:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Houtman 