lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chris Bangle

message: Didn't Bangle get demoted from head designer to design director?
→No. His promotion to a higher seat in the BMW hierarchy was seen as a 'demotion' but he technically got more power in the BMW group and gave up day-to-day operations in BMW design to Adrian Van Hooydonk Reference. Jdeviant 20:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can this article be edited by someone who did graduate from high school? 82.73.93.89 (talk) 15:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: language

message: Anyone have one? Suigetsu 00:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: picture
Template talk:Swimming styles

message: I created the template because I want to make navigation between stroke pages easier (it's slightly annoying to have to figure out the exact name of the stroke page sometimes).  Feel free to add to these links as warranted; there are a few strokes/styles that probably should have their own articles but do not.
It'd also be nice if someone would make try to work on the template structure a little; I pretty much just lifted it from another template!  –Pakman044 07:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Charlie Clausen

message: Here is a pic of Charlie that should be uploaded onto the page:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/wfedor/blogspot/charlieclausen.jpg
(This link does not work)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.156.153.32 (talk) 01:26, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There has been no confirmation that states Charlie Clausen will have a role in Resident Evil: Extinction as Chris Redfield. Can we please stop this speculation. It's getting rather tiresome to keep removing them. Eikichi 00 19:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resident Evil: Extinction 
Talk:From a Second Story Window

message: i've rewritten the band bio and hopefully added some more knowledgeable information. i'm working on gathering information on their upcoming album Conversations. Guitar freak91 (talk) 04:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 
Talk:Bifurcation (law)

message: I have not studied criminal procedure. Can someone who has please verify that criminal trials are always "bifrucated" into trial and sentencing. I am not confident that this division is technically the same as bifurcation which is explicitly definied in the FRCP. I am concerned that someone [poster] may have seen criminal trials as being demarcated (albiet correctly) and assumed that this is the same as bifurcation. I am unsure if this is the case. LH 07:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Salmon/Archive 1

message: Hi everyone, 
I working to re-write this article. My notes are being maintained on my website. You can read them if you like, but currently only I am listed as authorized contributor from didgood.com. However, if you use your own words, I won't have a problem. 
In any case, fell free to look at the notes on my website. Below are links to articles and upcoming sections.
* Start Here salmon
* Salmon Canneries Historical 
* Salmon Cannery Towns
* Farm-raised Color Added
* The salmon we eat.
* Life History of Salmon
* The history of Salmon extripated by human efforts. (Dams, pollutions, etc.)
* Salmon introduction into non-native environments
* Types of Salmon (Atlantic, Pacific, Landlocked, Steelhead)
* Allies, Cohorts, Companions and other Anadromous water life.
* Salmon's Food in the Wild
* Hatcheies
* Angling/Fishing & Sportsmanship
* Historical Fishing methods
* Farm-raised
--meatclerk 08:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: This paragraph was removed last night;
:Salmon aquaculture has come under increasing scrutiny from environmental protection organizations due to problems of habitat destruction, pollution, disease, and escape of farmed fish into wild populations. Atlantic Salmon introduced for sport fishing are also now causing concern over their possible effects on native fish.
Whilst I would agree that it is unbalanced, the statement is one I'm familiar with.
As mentioned above, we could do with a general section on salmon farming (especially as few other fish species are farmed). -- Solipsist 08:20, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Salmon farming

message: I hope nobody minds--Sir.Salmon FishThe First 14:08, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I've made a number of small gramatical chnages
Talk:May Hill

message: Quite a good article, if I say so myself. It may need some basic cleanup and wikification though, and sections would be nice but otherwise it is of very high quality, probably counts as a 'good article' (wherever that WP space article about good articles is...) --Draicone (talk) 07:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting 

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Judas Priest discography

message: Does anyone have any idea about Judas priest album certification(gold/Platinum) in countries outside the US and UK?
Will231982 07:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Something

message: I've noticed that theres a weird gray border on all the albums pictures. Whats up?Д narchistPig (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures 

message: Current "Peak chart positions" of albums are not correct. For example, Turbo (Judas Priest album) didn't reach number one on UK album chart. See Billboard chart(allmusic.com) and UK chart(chartstats.com). I think these changes (on 13 November 2009) are vandalism.--Ikespirit (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: Hmmm, I don't see 'Priest, Live & Rare' (Amazon) -- should it be listed?  --Xqnstyl (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing albums? 

message: One compilation album is missing in this article. I think it's called Playlist: The Very Best of Judas Priest. This one was release in 2008. 119.93.67.178 (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing compilation 

message: I don't see any reason why the Gull releases (The Best of Judas Priest, Hero, Hero and Genocide) shouldn't included this section. They may be unauthorized but they're not bootlegs. By the way, Playlist: The Very Best of Judas Priest and Setlist: The Very Best of Judas Priest Live and The Complete Albums Collection are also absent for no reason. Charles Essie (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Judas Priest discography#Compilation albums|Compilation albums]]

message: I cleaned up and improved the "Singles" section, adding reliable sources. 16 October.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.187.46.221 (talk) 18:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles section updated 

message: Can this discography article have the sales and certifications separated? I don't see other discography articles like this and this has given me the idea that the sales and certifications should be separated. 2601:407:4181:4260:7489:1269:3DA7:B3AA (talk) 12:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales and certifications
Talk:Cummings Research Park

message: Cummings Research Park was voted as the most outstanding science park in the world in 1997.
Who came up with this vote? --Abdull 07:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I note that articles on other research parks, including Research Triangle Park in North Carolina, and the Illinois Technology and Research Corridor, contain list of companies that reside within those parks.  To be consistent, should not the Cummings Research Park article also contain one?  Or should these lists be removed from all research park articles?  Dave Cornutt (talk) 16:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of companies
Talk:Augusta Emerita

message: A good source for any future work on this article is
http://www.merida.es/historia.asp --Kevs 08:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: In paragraphs two of the Augusta Emerita article, the city is described as 20,000 square kilometers (7,700 square miles) in size.  Something this size would be a massive City, taking up a big chunk of southern Spain itself. Perhaps the measurement was 20.0 square kilometers (7.7 sq. mi.), or a smaller unit of measurement was intended. I haven’t found the answer at this time, but wanted to bring it to the attention of the experts.  VicLazlo (talk) 18:33, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I've corrected the info per the source (which is not the greatest) to read "The city, one of the largest in Hispania, was the capital of the Roman province of Lusitania, controlling an area of over 20,000 square kilometres (7,700 sq mi)." I'm glad you corrected yourself about the sizes of Spain and Europe relative to this figure.;-) I will replace the source later. Carlstak (talk) 00:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of Augusta Emerita
Talk:Casey McDonald

message: horribly insecure, anal retentive, control freakish, self righteous busybody...more of opinion then actual fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.252.117 (talk) 08:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

message: i strongly disagree with your recent comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. rockborn (talk • contribs) 19:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  i disagree 

message: Not even close to encyclopaediac quality.  Hearsay, gossip, immature writing style... blech.  I'm going to strike it from my memory now and go back to knowing nothing about this perhaps-most-famous guy.
72.245.23.125 21:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible Article
Talk:HMQS Gayundah

message: "For this cruise, the 6" bow gun was removed to provide greater bunkering for coal to increase the ship's range.". The bow gun was 8-inch; the stern gun was 6-inch. Rcbutcher (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 6 inch bow gun ??

message: During the course of her history Gayundah initially sported an 8" gun, which was later replaced with a 6" gun, anmd whichwas later gotten rid of entirely of course.
203.13.3.89 (talk) 05:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: response

message: In the under construction section appears the following inaccurate paragraph: 
"In concert with Paluma, the ship sailed for Australia in November 1884, travelling via the Suez Canal, under the command of Captain Henry Townley Wright. The ships arrived in Brisbane on 28 March 1885.[3]"
I recommend this be changed to "Gayundah sailed for Australia in November 1884, under the command of Captain Henry Townley Wright. Having traveled via the Suez Canal, the ship arrived at Brisbane on 27 March 1885."
Reference: newspaper:  The Brisbane Courier (Saturday 28 March 1885, page 5.) 
see also the following URL for more: https://www.gayundah.info/?page_id=267
The above is a necessary change as Paluma sailed for Australia at a later date, she arrived in Brisbane on 7 May 1885 as stated on the wikipedia HMQS Paluma entry.
Landyvlad (talk) 01:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I have updated the article now per your suggestion. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gayundah Brisbane arrival date incorrect. Paluma reference incorrect.
Talk:Flight jacket

message: All the links under the External Links heading lead to WP pages, should they be classed as external? MarpoHarks (talk) 00:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: This list comprises a list of wikipedia links to articles on jackets. Most of these articles do not exist. Please explain why I should not extinguish the failing links. OrewaTel (talk) 03:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Jackets
Talk:Marti Venturi

message: she's a bit of a brat
Stop making pointless edits with articles having to do with Life with Derek... 68.20.32.78 00:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Who erased the entire article? And is there any way for someone to recover the lost information? (Sorry, I'm not very Wiki-savvy.) 24.57.120.190 (talk) 01:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No Article

message: Per all the other character pages, if you wish to return the content YOU must provide the sources. MM207.69.137.25 (talk) 21:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BURDEN]]
Talk:Mary Poppins Opens the Door

message: From records in the U.S. Library of Congress [ref name=LCC] and WorldCat (via P.L. Travers at WorldCat),  I infer that it was published first in the United States, 1943 rather than 1944. (Alternatively, U.S. libraries have used copyright rather than publication year.) The records give much different page counts, 219 UK and 239 US; both with credit to both Mary Shepard and Agnes Sims as illustrators. The Opie Collection of Children's Literature record for its microfiche of the first edition is most informative, so I linked that one in the infobox, . 
If published 1943 US and 1944 UK, I wonder whether British publication was delayed by some wartime shortage of paper or another material. --P64 (talk) 19:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publishers and dates
Talk:Aegeus

message: "...and knocked the wine glass out of Theseus' hand."  It's best to stick close to the written accounts rather than improvise in the manner of afternoon television confrontations. Can anyone tell me why this vivid detail is silly?--Wetman 00:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "wine glass"

message: Clearly something is missing between this:
"Father and son were thus reunited, and Medea was sent away to Asia."
and this:
"Aegeus had told Theseus, before he left, to put up the white sails when he left Crete..."
There's no mention, prior to this, of Theseus leaving for anywhere, or going on a mission to Crete.  The sentence even becomes ambiguous as to who is meant by the "he" in "he
left." zadignose (talk) 08:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fragmented narrative
Talk:The Road to Oz

message: The subtitle "In Which Is Related How Dorothy Gale of Kansas, The Shaggy Man, Button Bright, and Polychrome the Rainbow's Daughter Met on an Enchanted Road and Followed it All the Way to the Marvelous Land of Oz" does not appear in the first edition of the book. This subtitle was added in later reprints, likely by the publisher. As it was not originally part of the book's title, I don't think it should be included in the opening sentence. It could be included, however, in discussion of the various different prints and editions if someone wanted to add such material. Nosferattus (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtitle
Talk:The Tin Woodman of Oz

message: Hello Oz freaks and Wikipeople!  Forgive me for abusing the TALK page to ask a question which doesn't necessarily affect the article, but if I don't learn the answer to this question soon, I will go mad and need to be put into a rubber room and kept under sedation.  
The first edition of The Tin Woodman of Oz, and all subsequent editions right up to the large paperback which I owned in the 1970s, refer to the glue which Ku-Klip the tin-smith used to stick body-parts together and construct Chopfyt, as "meat glue".  I was so intrigued with the idea that when I was dungeon-master in a game of Dungeons & Dragons (which was a new thing in the 1970s) I had my players find a treasure with some meat glue in it, introducing a new magical item into our D&D lexicon.  
But today, the books in the stores, and the online stuff at Gutenberg, all say "magic glue" instead of "meat glue".  
Can someone PLEASE tell me who made the decision to change it, and when, and why?  I search and search online and I cannot find the answer.  Thank you, HandsomeMrToad (talk) 02:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Meat glue" vs "magic glue" 

message: Although the question of why The Tin Woodman of Oz (and several other Baum books) sold so well in 1914 is a very interesting one, the association with WWI sounds like original research, if I am correct in thinking that the cited book, The Generation of 1914, does not mention Baum specifically, but rather merely talks about trauma and possibly about nostalgia. If the book does in fact mention sales of this book as an example, this should be made more clear than it is currently. It seems to me that a more plausible explanation would be the fact that many if not most of the girls who read The Wonderful Wizard of Oz as children when that book was published in 1900 would now have small children of their own. But that would obviously be MY original research, and should not be mentioned in the article. It seems sufficient to note the increase in sales without speculating on the cause, unless, as I said, the cited book does in fact touch on the matter.--Matt Thorn (talk) 12:42, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for sales--original research?
Talk:Glinda of Oz

message: Plot Summary section seems overly detailed, way too long.  More a blow-by-blow than a summary.  A SUMMARY doesn't have to mention the little side-adventures along-the-way like the Spiders!  Short and sweet is perfectly adequate, tells what happens without omiting anything big.
Correct it if it seems too brutal a cut, but I really think it's better. SingingZombie (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: Why is the publisher listed as "Reilly and Lee"?  At the time it was called "Reilly and Britton".  207.237.243.185 (talk) 00:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OOps my bad the name was changed in 1919.  Have fixed edit.207.237.243.185 (talk) 00:45, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Publisher
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Hunger/Proposed decision

message: I'm uncomfortable with the "ongoing enterprises" section's implied endorsement of the notion of corporate personhood.  The BLP policy is probably necessary, but it imposes a de facto SPOV onto biographical articles, in tension with the NPOV principle.  Danny apparently suggested WP:BIO should be adjusted to raise the standards of notability for living people, maybe because of this. 
If BLP applies to "enterprises" as well as to living persons, then maybe the same adjustments should be made to WP:CORP.  I think the Hunger Project is well-known enough that it wouldn't be affected by the adjustments.  Phr (talk) 08:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt

message: Dodson & Hilton’s chronology (2004) is in error showing Amenehet IV’s year 9 as the full moon date 1806bc Sep 8. The record specifically says Payni 29 is the feast of lunar day 13 as in 1790bc Sep 8. Though this 1790bc feast is 3 days before the Sep 11 full moon (day 16), consider this error of 1806bc to match a full moon to Sep 8. This Sep 8 date is Payni 25 not the recorded Payni 29 which is 4 leap days later on Sep 12 being 16 years earlier 1806-1790bc.
(Tribute to Richard Parker) =206 years 1991-1785 bc; Sesostris III: Season Ahket =Thoth; New Moon year 3, Epipi 16 =1876bc Oct 16; Sothic year 7, Parmuti 16 =1872bc July 17; Parmuti 16 =1872bc July 17; 1st rise of Sothis at Memphis; New Moons: year 32,  Hatyr 6 =1847bc Feb 1; Amenomhet III: Next derived from Pakon 16 as lunar day 9; year 29, Pakon 8 =1814bc July 25; (Pakon 16 =1814bc Aug 2 ) year 30, Payni 26 =1813bc Sep 10; And every 59 days for 10 months (p.66): year 30, Mesor 25 =1813bc Nov  8; Paopi 20 =1812bc Jan 7; Koyak 18 =1812bc Mar 7; Mekir 18 =1812bc May 6; Parmuti 17 =1812bc July 4; Amenemhet IV: Following within 54 days of Sothis: year 9,  Pakon 6 =1790bc July 17 Lunar day 13: Payni 29 =1790bc Sep 8 as full moon feast day 13. (RSchiller) 98.144.71.174 (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't the section on Sensuret II supposed to be on Sensuret III? Elium2 (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sensurets 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tenth dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt
Talk:Ozoplaning with the Wizard of Oz

message: The "Airland" section of this article is entirely original research, the only refs are to the text itself and to a dictionary, none of which make or contain the points in the section.  Flagged.  HandsomeMrToad (talk) 06:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Airland" section is original research
Talk:BlitzkriegCommander

message: This article is nothing more than a for sale ad for the game, addressing none of the negative points, and due to this I believe is in violation of Wikipedia posting guidelines. (This comment by User:68.107.139.129 was added to the main page on August 5, 2006. Moved to talk page and added advert tag to article page. --Ebyabe 13:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The individual  Pete-the-wargamer, has created this, and the Cold War Commander article, both are very POV to the degree of an advertisement, and I would seriously question the grounds for notability on both.
At this time I would recommend both articles for deletion based on the above factors, unless notability can be proven, and the articles cleaned up to meet NPOV standards...
A tag has been placed on :Template:Db-spam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 70.162.234.178 07:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These rules are widely played and definitely need a place on wikipedia.  However, reffs are needed.Dejvid (talk) 13:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Owner/Rules Writer is creating these articles....
Talk:Kamille Bidan

message: I changed the the word used to describe what happened to Kamille at the end of Zeta Gundam from "catatonic" to "psychotic."  I think its a better description because it is more general and encompasses several possible disorders (since the exact psychiatric disorder is not stated).  Catatonia refers to extreme loss of motor ability or constant hyperactive motor activity while Kamille appears to suffer from impairment of his perception and thinking that would place him more in the psychosis category. Integrity168 08:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate of Kamille in Zeta Gundam
Talk:1726 to 1730 in sports

message: Although the story sounds great, Doubleday could not have invented baseball because he was at West Point that summer. Baseball was not invented, it was standardized with rules set down by Cartwright.--Jojhutton (talk) 22:51, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Baseball undoubtedly evolved from much earlier games, especially stoolball.  As you say, it was not invented any more than cricket or football were.  --Orrelly Man (talk) 08:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubleday Myth