lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ice cider

message: I rewrote the first paragraph as there are multiple methods to produce Cidre de glace, all involving natural freezing. The issue is that very few cultivars of trees will still have fruits on their branches come winter time, so harvesting the apples in winter is not always possible. Hence the cryoconcentration methods involving harvest in late autumn and freezing of the harvested fruits, which is quite different from icewine production methods. I would cite La Face Cachée de la Pomme (as it is where I got the info I changed in the article) in the main article but it is a commercial site, so that would be promoting one producer above others. Maybe more neutral sources can be found.--Boffob 03:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Reference 1 leads to a 404 error page, and reference 2 isn't clear as to the information that has been retrieved from it. There should be better references to support this articleHaircommander (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References need work 
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 6, 2007

message: Comma splice in the blurb.  Please make the following correction:
The Jersey Shore shark attacks of 1916 were a series of shark attacks along the coast of New Jersey in which four people were killed and one injured . The attacks occurred between July 1 and July 12, 1916, during a deadly summer heat wave and polio epidemic in the northeastern United States that drove thousands of people to the seaside resorts of the Jersey Shore. 
Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 03:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done by  .  Thanks, ➪HiDrNick! 03:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gilda Joyce: The Ladies of the Lake

message: I'm currently working on a major revision to all the Gilda Joyce entries. I have obtained some sources that I intent to read through in the next two weeks, and I will update these pages accordingly. I will remove this note when I am finished; in the meantime, feel free to add any information you come by.  Zane McFate (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Kendall Ciesemier

message: Why have populated parameters been removed from this article's infobox? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they were factually incorrect. This individual is, according to the article, a current GWU student, not an alum. She is "from" Illinois, but this is likely no longer her primary place of residence given her attendance at a DC-area school. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox =
Talk:Vehicle conversion

message: I'm wondering why vehicle conversion redirects to flexable fuel vehicles?  A converted vehicle that runs on a single fuel type with a single fuel tank, such as straight vegetable oil is not a flex-fuel, it is a full conversion to oil.  There should be an article to these cars, and those types of cars would not fit under the flex-fuel vehicle article.  Perhaps we should un-redirect this article and start it anew.  I'll do it if no one objects.  Rhetth 03:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is a redirect accurate?
Talk:Andrew Velasquez

message: 1- Request add of suffix "III" to header file to serve to differentiate from others w/ name Andrew Velasquez.  
page indicates
2 - RE: "the neutrality of this article is disputed".  Is there an item that needs a reference that I can add or perhaps something that i should
remove to address the dispute?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapalaja (talk • contribs) 22:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Energy in Scotland

message: I think it would be useful for all the regional power station navigation templates to link to each other. To keep discussion in one place, please comment at Template talk:South East powerstations#Links to other regional powerstation navboxes rather than here. Thryduulf (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to other regional powerstation navboxes 

message: List of power stations in Scotland shows that there are a lot more than can sensibly be fitted into a template.  What are the criteria for the subset in this template? It seems to include a mix of large & small.--FDent (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this list chosen?
Talk:U (disambiguation)

message: What about those measures in U units ?  Does anybody knows about it ?
 U Height (external height including feet)
 20 = 1075 mm
 30 = 1515 mm
 40 = 1960 mm
 Dimensions
 Width and Depth as show in product title.
 U Height (external height)
 6 = 375 mm
 9 = 510 mm
 12 = 645 mm
 15 = 780 mm
 18 = 920 mm
 21 = 1045 mm
--AXRL (talk) 12:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer Racks
Talk:Parotid gland

message: This is a serious duct.  I don't know if its worth mentioning, but here it is anyhow151.197.226.243 03:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Studies showing a link between cellular phones and parotid gland tumors should be mentioned. Badagnani (talk) 07:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cell phones

message: Should this page be merged with [Parotid Duct]?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.118.100 (talk) 00:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 8, 2007

message: A capitalization error leads to a redirect near the end of the blurb.  Please correct
Fears regarding 'Peak Oil' ...
to read
Fears regarding 'Peak oil' ...
Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 03:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 04:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Civil procedure (United States)

message: It's soooo long and, on articles covering concepts used in places besides the US, it would overshadow any similar templates about other countries. 
Also, the See Also section is empty. It would be great to have links to related templates. Sorry all I can do is ask. Thanks! --Geekdiva (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure thanking you why?? Is it so hard to get a good man I'm ready to sit down and live, I've listed everything last yr praying all works out God:s way,Can someone please help me Lord need money to get into my home🤞🤞🤞🙏🙏🙏🙌🙌🙌🍀🍀🍀🍀 216.119.187.39 (talk) 09:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would someone please make this collapsible?
Template talk:Contract law

message: In the template, the Abstraction Principle is characterized as "Explicitly rejected by the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts." I do not find any source confirming this statement. Please clarify. NhanGL2008 (talk) 02:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstraction principle and UNIDROIT PICC 

message: I have nominated the image used on this template for deletion from Wikimedia Commons. Editors are invited to join the  there. Thank you. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion nomination
Template talk:Criminal procedure (trial)

message: Does anyone else think that Right to counsel should be put on the page/in the template? 
→  ( • ) 15:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely! bd2412 T 16:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Right to counsel

message: I wonder if there's a way to let people know discreetly what things like E&W stand for, as I don't think it's obvious to people without legal knowledge that that's England and Wales. <acronym> doesn't work, but it could be pipe linked, so that the full name would show up when hovered over, but that might be confusing as it's not really a link that belongs in the box.
I propose linking them to the England and Wales, or Courts of England and Wales, obviously dependant on whichever country; I'll go ahead and do that. Many thanks, Drum guy (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh, doesn't really need discussion :) Drum guy (talk) 14:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronyms 

message: Wouldl Community sentence belong into this template? Littledogboy (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community sentence
Talk:Lamoka site

message: External link needs to be updated - Sept. 2017
Jeff Cartier (talk) 09:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

message: Successive paragraphs of the current text have "(c.3500 BC)" & "approximately 4,500 years before present". Something is wrong, either one of those statements or the way I am reading the text. Pashley (talk) 08:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of the site?
Template talk:Tort law

message: I just realized that this template has links to "Negligent emotional distress" and "Intentional emotional distress." After I stopped laughing, I tracked down who inserted the names of torts that don't actually exist.  They appear to have been inserted at this well-intended edit  in May 2007 by Wikidea.   
The terms "intentional infliction of emotional distress" and "negligent infliction of emotional distress" have long been established, at least in American law.  For example, see, e.g., Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering (1970) 2 Cal.3d 493 (finding that use of racial epithets during firing was sufficient to support an IIED cause of action) and Thing v. La Chusa (1989) 48 Cal.3d 644.
I think the better solution would be to either restore the full names of these torts or insert the common acronyms for them, IIED and NIED.  What does everyone else think? --Coolcaesar 06:37, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a typing error! In the UK we just call it "psychiatric harm" and then there's Wilkinson v Downton which hasn't been used in almost any reported case since the 19th century. So these American terms are beyond me! Wikidea 15:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just caught a rather funny error by Wikidea 

message: The defences would apply to torts not listed in that section, wouldn't it make sense to make a separate section? Actually the necessity article only implies the defence is for property torts. I guess that might be an issue with that article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.128.50.20 (talk) 01:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defences in the intentional torts section
Talk:TRIGA

message: The original quote about graduate students with the Teller 2001 reference was correct so I have reverted it accordingly. Freeman Dyson paraphrased the idea with a more flowery quote in Disturbing the Universe (1979 https://archive.org/details/disturbinguniver0000dyso/page/97/mode/1up). I find the one directly from Teller more readily quotable rather than the Dyson-summarizing-Teller quote.
Ntouran (talk) 01:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the Teller quote about children
Talk:Johnny Roventini

message: Did You Know
...that Johnny Roventini was a dwarf bellboy in a New York City hotel when he was paid $1 to "Call for Phillip Morris", unknowlingly beginning his 40-year career as an advertising icon in radio, television, and print media?
:Unless you can add citations, it is unlikely that anybody will pick this up for a DYK.Balloonman 06:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: citations added. Mark in Historic Triangle 09:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Figured it wouldn't take too long ;-)Balloonman 18:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One other thing, but this won't affect the DYK, you might want to take a look at WP:CITE and see the various ways that you can add citations.  Traditionally, just leaving a link isn't the ideal situation... this is particularly true if you want it to pass GAC or some other grading standard down the road... it seems as if you put a lot of effort into this article.  Generally, the citation should indicate who the author was (if available), what the title of the work was (if available), what the publication/website was, the date of the publication (if available), and the date accessed.Balloonman 18:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blurb for DYK 
Talk:Moors Sundry Act of 1790

message: Please note that sundry is an archaic word for several or various. It is misleading to refer to "the Sundry Free Moors" as if it were a proper noun. What is meant is that the petition came from "several free Moors." -- Rob C. alias Alarob 04:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sundry Free Moors"
Talk:Dragon Ball Z (film)

message: Why I think these should be merged--$UIT 04:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it was redirected--$UIT 04:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: There were two film articles that existed at the same time.  This one is under the proper naming conventions.  However, the content should be placed on the source material's article; see the reason below. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Per notability guidelines for films, this article should be merged to Dragon Ball in a "Live-action film adaptation" section.  It does not warrant its own article yet; a lot of projects stop short of ever entering production, even when they appear so close.  The IGN citation shows that news about this film actually progressing is unconfirmed. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your right. Guidelines say, "Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced shooting should not have their own articles." It sounds like they definitely haven't begun filming. Jecowa 05:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Should it go on the Dragon Ball Z article instead of the Dragon Ball article? I think the story of this movie is supposed to start at the same place that Dragon Ball Z starts at. Also, instead of deleting this page, could we blank it out and stick a link on it to the section in the article that it is being moved to? Jecowa 05:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I didn't realize a Dragon Ball Z article existed.  The film article just mentioned Dragon Ball, so I went with that.  Yes, content can be placed there instead, and a redirect can be created from here to there.  If the film enters production, it would warrant a stand-alone article.  This has been done with items like Spider-Man 4 and The Hobbit (2009 film).  There are some examples of film articles that need to be merged, but that's an agenda in progress. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Why is page is under Deletion? I mean the movie is comeing out, so why delete it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.91.213 (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says that nothing is locked in for the production of this film.  A lot of projects in the film industry may linger in development hell for some time, sometimes finally being produced, sometimes never making progress.  See Jurassic Park IV for such an example.  You may want to review the arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Ball Z (film) to understand the issue better. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:States of Palau

message: Ngerulmud is listed as being in state of Palau, in Palau region. However, Ngerulmud article says The city is located in the state of Melekeok on Babeldaob. Also, Palau#States does not even have "Palau" as a state. 82.141.126.42 (talk) 15:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Cigar box

message: After finishing the Cigarette case article I could not stop but to add this one, after wikilinking it into "see also" and then noticing this cart in front of the horse (moved). -user:Laudak
*Now that there are several articles with "Cigar Bowl" in their titles and one for the Baker Bowl (which was nicknamed the "Band Box" and the "Cigar Box", both of these terms ultimately referring to any intimate baseball stadium whose configurations are conducive to home runs), it seems about time to create a disambiguation page for this term. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article life

message: Should the Flat top link be removed, due to the fact that it only leads to a disambiguation page, with no linking to a flat top cigar box type, but in fact leading back to this very page?
Fewmenleft (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flat top 
Talk:Arnaud's

message: Just walked by this place yesterday but didn't have a chance to eat there.  This article, although it has some useful info, was obviously written by someone connected with the restaurant and is essentially a P.R. release.... Hayford Peirce (talk) 15:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obviously written by a member of the staff or ownership 

message: I take exception to the description of Arnaud's as "one of the few" places still serving classic Creole cuisine in New Orleans. The city is full of restaurants that serve classic Creole cuisine. Mpaniello (talk) 03:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the Few?!?
Talk:Mawab

message: Mawabboy 04:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Midland Line, New Zealand

message: For a long time I have been greatly impressed by the Wikipedia rail map rail line diagrams in rail related articles - on enquiring further I now understand that bots r responsible 4 either originating, correcting, formatting, updating or maintaining consistency in the rail line map diagrams : how about some more km or milepost line distances in the Midland (Christchurch - Greymouth) Line rail diagram especially 4 the old stations en route - ?? ; ... also the rail map line diagram 4 Main North Line New Zealand needs some correction or formatting corrections 2 look presentable and 2 b easy 2 understand and read : ... magic bots get 2 it - !! Don (Wingco) PATERSON (talk) 19:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midland Line New Zealand - bots & distances
Talk:Donnellys Crossing Section

message: Donnellys Crossing never had a combined bridge. There was no road going south from the railway yard across the bridge. The bridge was a double track yard bridge, decked for the use of railway staff walking through the yard. There were two tracks across it, the main line and the loop, and they joined at the points just to the south of the bridge. These statements saying one side was for road are wrong. Both sides were laid with track and used until the line closed. The only access needed at the south end of the yard was two or three railway houses with only footpaths to them. Donnellys Station Road was extended through there after the line closed and the tracks were removed. No road is visible in any of the many photos of this bridge when the line was open which have appeared in numerous publications over the years.
PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 04:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  False claim there was a combined bridge at Donnellys Crossing
Talk:Brian Rimmer

message: Help please?
Have posted several requests for help on this page previously - am looking to update and source all information contained on this page (which I have discerned more than meets Wikipedia's requirements for validity) yet the page has seemingly been shut down and all links to it from other Wikipedia pages have turned black. 
As I have previously mentioned in other posts requesting help, I was unaware of the four tildes rule which may have been a contributing factor to its disappearance. 
I fear the page may now be a candidate for deletion, I was hoping a Wikipedia editor could help me here by either allowing access to the page so I can provide sources for all information contained therein, or by explaining what I as a contributor am doing wrong.
Any help would be much appreciated, thank you.
Lance 6/9/07
211.28.33.180 05:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming that you're Thinkloop88, who recently created this page. If you would like to create this page as its own article, you need to make sure it is neutral, verified by reliable sources, and that it is notable. Until it meets these guidelines, it cannot exist on its own. If you would like to build this article in a personal sandbox before adding it to the mainspace, you can create subpage of your userspace, provided you have an account. Instructions on how to do this can be found here. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks. i said 05:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: The article in question has not been deleted, it was redirected. You can see the redirect here. --Silver Edge 07:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kingston Branch

message: Have you got the distances of Ords Siding and the Limehills Siding around the wrong way? I think Ords must have been at 37 km and Limehills at 39 km. Centre Bush is at 41, and there is no place for an 'Ords' between Limehills and Centre Bush. There was once an 'Ords Sawmill' located at Swales Bush on Java Rd, south of Pisa Rd. They are recorded as having hauled their logs to Ords Siding. They would not have hauled them through Limehills to the north, as they would have had to if your current list is correct. Throttleer (talk) 09:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidings on the Kingston Branch line
Talk:Brainship

message: The following is mostly copied from Talk:The Ship Who Sang:
Rather than merge this article into The Ship Who Sang, I suggest a change of title to Brains (Ship series) (or something similar) and changing the content to a description of the brains as a whole, not just those who serve as brainships, and their roles in the society of the Ship books. McCaffrey and her various co-writers put plenty of explanatory and background material into the books that could be used here. In fact, I might just volunteer for the task--but I'll have to ask my mom to re-loan me her copies of the books and read the series again, which will take a while, especially since I'm currently entrenched in re-reading the Crystal Singer books. -- Pennyforth 05:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revising this article
Talk:Flyin' Jenny

message: As quoted in the book, "The Aviation Art of Russell Keaton", I've corrected the source of the name for the strip. I've had many conversations about Russell with his widow, Virginia Keaton Anderson, before she passed away. She never got over his early death. I'm married to the only granddaughter Russell and Virginia had. We were very close to Virginia, or "Gigi" as she was called by the family. My wife inherited hers and Russell's house, and we've been living in it since her death, almost 5 years ago.
Stalag17 05:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of strip
Talk:20 mm Polsten

message: There is simply no way that the per unit cost was "£60 - £70" when the per unit cost of Lee Enfield rifles was over £8 per rifle at the time.  While the Polsten was "simplified" it still required considerable machining and high quality steel alloys.  Production of 20mm barrels alone would have cost more than £70.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.209.147 (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unit cost £60 - £70"?  Highly unlikely
Talk:George V. Underwood Jr.

message: The article and its sources state Underwood commanded the Aerospace Defense Command. However I cannot find his name in the list of the commanders. In addition the Aerospace Defense Command was a Major Command of the United States Air Force. Therefore it is hard to believe that an Army General commanded an Air Force Installation. May be Underwood commanded an other Army organisation with the same or a similiar name. WAG57 (talk) 18:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commander Aerospace Defense Command
Talk:PV-1 machine gun

message: The 2008 book Пулеметы русской армии в бою by Семён Федосеев has this "Tula proverb" on p. 74: "Пулеметы знает Бог, Третьяков и Пастухов". Those two guys were responsible for the PM M1910 basically. Someone not using his real name (talk) 12:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tretyakov & Pastuhov