lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spain–United States relations

message: DONT READ THIS!!!!!!!!
 to Chavez'z increasingly autocratic racist butt
" with elected socialist government. The idea that the government of Hugo Chavez is autocratic or is becoming increasingly autocratic is based on point of view, however the fact that the government has been elected (fairly, might I add) has been verified by international observers from around the world, therefore it is a fact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.92.71.39 (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

message: I miss some mention of the conspiracy theories about the CIA attitudes towards Operación Ogro (Carrero Blanco's murder) and 23-F.
I also miss a mention of Bienvenido Mr Marshall that still colors perceptions of American money in Spain (see recent reporting on Eurovegas for examples)
--Error (talk) 01:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing 
Talk:Cove (Appalachian Mountains)

message: Would a brief sentence explaining the topographical similarities/differences between land coves and coves along bodies of water be appropriate, or is that a Wiktionary thing?  The two types of coves have the same etymology.  Bms4880 (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My impression (see http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cove for the sources of this impression) is that the two meanings have the same ancestor (that is, a word or words meaning "cave", "closet", "sheltered nook," or "small chamber"), but they evolved separately from that ancestral word. If that impression is correct (I need to check the print copy of the OED), there is no etymological justification for comparing the meanings of the two terms. An ideal place to discuss the etymology might be Cove (disambiguation), but I believe that is contrary to Wikipedia policy on disambiguation pages. I don't know much about Wiktionary, but it appears to me that http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cove is the right place for the discussion. --Orlady (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coves and inlets
Talk:Hamilton Township, Warren County, Ohio

message: maintinance and beautification of township areas.. I have lived her for 4 years. I see no interest by the township showing any interest in having property owners maintain properties to draw interest to outsider should the want to buy or build in the area. One area is directly across from township office. It is unfair to those that do maintain, protect and keep their neighborhood neat. Many manucipalties have laws that require properties keep grass cut to prevent excess varmints undercontrol.  There are two properties across the highway from your office that has been neglected for over 3 years and one for about 6 months. It is unfair to property owners.  Do more than talk and make the area more inviting. A neighbor across the street on Hildebrandt Dr. 2603:6010:BD44:8642:3053:FCCD:2B8B:365C (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Hellmaster

message: I have no idea what they are talking about.  I did not copy this page from mtv movies.  I didn't even visit that site. Creamy3 (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: MTV Movies is a mirrorsite of All Movie, from which the description did come. To remove copyright violation, the material must be completely rewritten to avoid long strings of wording from the original remaining. Since I have not seen the movie, I have incorporated information from Joe Bob Briggs' review to help remedy this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Discovery

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:The Discovery (album) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Discovery"

message: I think that discovery relating to computing/networks is missing from the Discovery disambiguation. This is the process by which entities, such as as nodes, are discovered (and may then be enumerated, communicated with etc.). Examples of such protocols are SSDP and LLDP. Also, for example, SNMP agents may be discovered by searching a subnet or range of IP addresses, specifically attempting to connect to the SNMP port (usually UDP port 161) for each IP address to check if a process is listening at this address. Further, there should be a Wikipedia entry for the general discovery mechanism (there are already entries for specific discovery protocols, such as SSDP and LLDP). 66.155.23.67 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovery protocols
Talk:Port Kirwan

message: this link could work:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentation_Sisters#St._John's,_Newfoundland--142.163.195.18 (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  red link to Presentation sisters 

message: this could work:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newfoundland_and_Labrador_Route_10--142.163.195.18 (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  red link Irish Loop 

message: Riverhead would be some hours away.  There is a Riverhead Road in Aquaforte - is that what is meant? --142.163.195.18 (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riverhead nearby?
Talk:Christa Ackroyd

message: Surely if you're a freelancer, you don't have a contract? Surely if you have a contract, you're not a freelancer? So how can "Ackroyd's freelance contract" be terminated? I'm a freelancer, I don't have a contract with anybody, I sell to whoever is willing to buy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.74.15 (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freelance? Contract? 
Talk:GPS animal tracking

message: I believe there is a substantive difference between GPS Tracking and GPS Wildlife Tracking which, as a process, is a branch of environmental biology and potentially conservation management. Should any merge be deemed necessary, I feel it should be into an article on Wildlife Telemetry or Animal Telemetry in general. Steelwool (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge of [[GPS Wildlife Tracking]] with [[GPS tracking]]
Talk:Connacht Under-20 Football Championship

message: This is a competition connected to a nationwide competition. Nationwide coverage is available, see for example: Mayo ready to defend titles. Night of the Big Wind talk 12:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose deletion

message: The actual name of this competition is Connacht Under-21 Football Championship. Please do not move it again to any other name without discussion and consensus. Brocach (talk) 12:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Use common name of competition
Talk:Connacht Under-21 Hurling Championship

message: Competition marred with problems, that are noteworthy on its own. Competion is active again and related to a nationwide (in effect: international) competition. Night of the Big Wind talk 16:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose deletion
Talk:Shakey the robot

message: I found much more detailed information about the robot and its architecture here:
http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~vaughan/teaching/889/papers/shakey.pdf
unfortunately the act of finding this report already arose from procrastination and I really should go on with my "real" work now... please feel free to extend the article yourself, i don't have the time...
85.179.107.230 (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More information

message: Article claims this was "a result of the project", but Hough transform source it to 1959, long before the project begun, and never mentions shakey at all. I believe this is a misstatement. קיפודנחש (aka kipod) (talk) 02:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hough transform references the Shakey team obliquely like so: "The classical Hough transform was concerned with the identification of lines in the image, but later the Hough transform has been extended to identifying positions of arbitrary shapes, most commonly circles or ellipses. The Hough transform as it is universally used today was invented by Richard Duda and Peter Hart in 1972" (Richard Duda and Peter Hart were two of the Shakey researchers at SRI). So the underlying claim seems to be that the Shakey project resulted in refinement of, extension of or further development of the Hough transform rather than creation of it. Which should be checked; if it's the case there's probably a better way to say it. --Blogjack (talk) 18:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hough transform
Talk:Junipero Serra Boulevard

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Hickey Boulevard and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 9#Hickey Boulevard until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  I.hate.spam.mail.here (talk | contributions) 21:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hickey Boulevard" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Monte Carlo localization

message: Just so that other editors are aware, I am currently rewriting this article to have better organization, verifiability, and readability. I also intend to create several new SVG graphics to clearly illustrate the concept for laymen. The primary reference for my rewrite will be the textbook Probabilsitic Robotics by Thrun, Burgard, and Fox (who are already cited in the current version of this article). I will also do a brief literature review and add useful things from various papers. You can view my progress at: User:Dllu/sandbox/Monte Carlo localization (but please do not make changes directly to my sandbox). Depending on how busy I am over the next few days, the rewrite may be completed this weekend, or it may take until the summer. Please let me know if you have any objections or suggestions to make, thanks! dllu (t,c) 10:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * mostly. I may add more things over time though. dllu (t,c) 09:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite in progress... 
Talk:Sonny (robot)

message: This sentence: "His skull houses a positronic brain theoretical physics, a "five-dimensional" object (a p-brane) in string theory that carries a magnetic charge under the B-field, the field under which the fundamental string is electrically charged." sounds wrong to me. Can anyone help me clear this out? I really want to translate this sentence but I simply can't. HaGamal 16:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How's that? -- CowplopmorrisTalkContribs 22:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something's wrong here... 

message: I was going to add something along the lines of Sonny having blue eyes while the other NS-5s having yellow, but I don't have a specific citation. I know it's mentioned in one of the commentaries, but I'm not sure which one. Also you could obviously watch the film (48.00). If anyone can find a specific written reference, then feel free to put it in. -- CowplopmorrisTalkContribs 23:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eyes
Talk:VPS Convenience

message: :Criminiminal
Why is this chain always getting robbed? Riselikehelium (talk) 16:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability
If you live or visit the region where this chain is located, you could see the importance of it as it is a large regional chain.  It was also part of Marsh Supermarkets, which was the first supermarket to utilize scanning technology.  They continued to introduce new items and ideas through the Village Pantry chain.
Per Wikipedia notability guidelines, this article has "Significant coverage", "Reliable", "Sources", "Independent of the subject" and "Presumed".  Also, per the guidelines "For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort."  
Scoty6776 (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duotang (band)

message: If you have something that you've found/add/can say more eloquently, knock yourself out. I'm looking for more links to reviews, possibly. P.Mk (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New page
Talk:16th The Queen's Lancers

message: "..on its return to England in 1846 the regiment petitioned successfully to retain this colour when all lancer regiments were ordered to return to blue."
This needs to be amended. The 16th had received permission to retain the scarlet coat before 1846, while still in India. 
On receiving word that the light cavalry were to revert to blue coats, Sir John Vandeleur, Colonel of the 16th Lancers,  made a personal appeal to the queen to retain scarlet and on 2nd March 1841 this was granted.
See: Rev. Percy Sumner in Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research, Vol 27, 1949, p.116.  
This is reflected on pp. 12-13, Queen's Regulations 1844.  Regiments of Cavalry, with the colours of their Uniforms and facings; (etc.)
"XVI. Queen’s Lancers: Colour of uniform : Scarlet"
JF42 (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "in 1846 the regiment petitioned successfully to retain this colour"
Talk:EcoBot

message: Anyone knows whether there are plans for EcoBot 3? EcoBot 2 is already +5 years ago, in 2004 ... and I thought the idea was 
kinda fun and interesting. 80.108.103.172 (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  EcoBot 3 
Talk:Robotix (competition)

message: *Refs
*Advert?
*closedown bottom bar
Chaosdruid (talk) 05:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone through copyediting the Robotix (competition) article. Hopefully it doesn't sound like an advertisement anymore. Please let me know if there's anything that still needs a copyedit. The article still needs a ton of references and notability beyond just the summary of the events. AngusWOOF (talk) 03:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed
Talk:Articulated robot

message: This phrase "IBM and compatible personal computers" needs to be reconsidered.  Although the IBM PC was the first type of computer to be used to program robotic systems, it no longer the de rigueur description for computers used to program robotics systems. Many engineers now use computers with UNIX based operating systems like Linux to program robotic systems.
--Sponsion (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Armwrestling match of EAP robotic arm against human

message: The article name is too long, it should be shortened--Infestor (talk) 12:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Too Long 

message: I'm considering proposing an article merge; specifically, merging this article into the article on EAP technology. It's doubtful anyone is going to be looking for the "Armwrestling Match of EAP Robotic Arm Against Human" (or even its acronym) unless they got here through the EAP article anyway; with its extremely long title and limited focus, this article would better serve as a section on the electroactive polymer article, particularly as the event demonstrated the limitations of the technology at that time. (A purpose-built robotic limb being "easily defeated" by a teenager certainly demonstrates that as of 2005, EAPs were not showing much in the way of "muscular" strength, and muscles are what the technology is being proposed to emulate in robotics.) Atypicaloracle (talk) 12:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Motion planning

message: I took out a bunch of equations that I thought were a bit too complex. 
Also  I think someone needs to define low-dimensional and high-dimensional, or substitute layperson language for those terms.
Jasemurphy (talk) 03:23, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but removing information does not make it more accessible. Yes, there will be formulas but that's inherent to the subject. Perhaps someone can discuss it in more detail. Low and high dimensional is not precisely defined but in short, when the number of dimensions increases, the worse it becomes to compute the algorithms. In this discussion, low-dimensional could be read as a dimensional space where computations are still tractable and high-dimensional as one where that is not the case. - Simeon (talk) 06:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modifications 

message: The edit  has removed a subsection from the article. According to my own prediction model, I'm very (>80%) sure that an admin will take action and restore the original content. This is equal to put the section back into the article.  The reason is, that the subsection “Random-MMP” was equipped with bibliographic references and improved the article by new insights.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManuelRodriguez (talk • contribs) 11:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Random-MMP section
Talk:Horse culture

message: Removed quotes and page numbers because no source was indicated. If someone wants to put them back, please give the name of the book.
Margin1522 (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rider people. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rider people listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kogado Studio

message: * Removal of a dynamic potentially damaging SPAM-Link: (RBN 369)
* hxxp://www.konamito.com/node/1064&page=7&c=Kogado
* http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3482426
* http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.konamito.com
--Gary Dee 19:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Removal
Talk:Robot Fighting League

message: This page only gives links to itself. It gives no sources, and is just self-advertising. There is no notability at all. Joerger, check what counts as a source before removing the no citations template. It even includes a link to what is a reliable source. 65.5.182.94 (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just noticed as well, doing a little googling, both MrTentacle (page creator) and Joerger (the main contributor) are RFL members, so a clear conflict of interest. 65.5.182.94 (talk) 07:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Until there is a clear problem with the article, citing particular editors is actually not the best thing to do.  Either fix the content, or if you have serious doubts regarding a specific editor, go through proper channels.  This is not the place to single out editors.  - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs 08:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please make sure of your sources before making accusations of self-interest. Joerger is not now nor has he ever been a member of the Robot Fighting League. I note that user 65.5.182.94 edited the article to restore outdated information and to remove a second reference that further established notability. The only contributions from user 65.5.182.94 have been attacks on this article. I believe that the recently added references clearly establish the notability of the RFL as the core organization currently driving the sport of combat robotics. If you will grant that combat robotics has notability, then the RFL must itself be notable.Run Amok (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What notability? It reads like a press release. The only sources are two links to the RFL's own site, and one to a second site, as a measure of notability, when it only seems to have certain events. I notice that it doesn't include Dragon*Con's events, which are arguably more notable (because its been going a lot longer) and so how many others doesn't it include? Notability isn't because it's got more entries on a certain list, that isn't itself exhaustive. This would reduce, in my eyes, the validity of that one external source. Are there any independent, verifiable sources for this article? And of course, Run Amok/Joerger, if you say you're not a member, and thus have no COI, I guess we'll have to take your word on it MuonMan (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Category talk:Designated places in British Columbia

message: The reference list of places that should be filed in this category is located at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=1302&SR=1&S=1&O=A&RPP=25&CMA=0&PR=59 . Bearcat (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tampa Preparatory School

message: This whole article is basically an ad for this for-profit school.
First Please remember to sign your posts,
The philosophy of education section had gotten some weasel words put into it and might have been seen as biased. The rest of the article is casting the school in a positive light perhaps but its not an ad. All the info comes from news articles i read and their website and it is factual. I never went there they were just next door to UT so i knew about them and i decided to write the article on them and its remained relatively unchanged since. If you think it is biased in tone then remove the bias wording and replace it with tone neutral wording. The content of the article is true and factual though so it should not be removed. And the fact that they are for profit is totally irrelevant to a point of view discussion.Trey (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Category talk:Designated places in Newfoundland and Labrador

message: The reference list of places that should be filed in this category is at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=1302&SR=1&S=1&O=A&RPP=25&CMA=0&PR=10 . Bearcat (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Category talk:Designated places in Alberta

message: The reference list of places that should be filed in this category is at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=1302&SR=1&S=1&O=A&RPP=25&CMA=0&PR=48. Bearcat (talk) 23:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion
Category talk:Designated places in Nova Scotia

message: The reference list of places that should be filed in this category is at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=1302&SR=1&S=1&O=A&RPP=25&CMA=0&PR=12 . Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

message: DPLs in Nova Scotia without articles as of February 26, 2009:
* Granville Ferry
* Hillside
* Lequille
* Milton Highlands
- Bearcat (talk) 20:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing articles
Category talk:Designated places in Manitoba

message: The reference list of places that should be filed in this category is at http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=1302&SR=1&S=1&O=A&RPP=25&CMA=0&PR=46 . Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)