lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hit Parader

message: *POV
The POV on this article is heavily critical and biased.  It is not neutral at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.233.222.93 (talk) 20:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know where else to post this, so I'm posting here this. I noticed that there's on many vocalist reference that they have been voted as one of Hit Parader Top 100 Metal Vocalist. I really don't know if this magazine is famous or anything, but I think that those references should be removed. Why? Well, have you seen that list? I'm sure that every person who knows at least a bit of metal/rock would say that is, pardon my french, a piece of crap. Why? Becouse many singers listed have absolutely nothing to do with metal. I'll just name few, becouse I really couldn't read the whole list. So here they are: Freddy Mercury, Paul Rodgers, Mick Jagger, Roger Daltrey, Kurt Cobain, Steve Perry, Steve Marriott, Anthony Kiedis, Jimi Hendrix, Rod Stewart, Bob Marley??? Yes, appearantly Rod Stewart and Bob Marley are heavy metal singers. I bet that they didn't even know that. Those are just few, not to mention that most of the rest of them are much more hard rock then heavy metal singers. So, could we please not quote this so called "top list" on Wikipedia? --93.136.29.59 (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hit Parader Top 100 Metal Vocalist 

message: The article implies that HP is defunct i.e. "was...", yet based on the link provided, it has a new issue "On newsstands now". This needs clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.177.76 (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the magazine is currently owned and/or published by Magna Publishing Group. Geneisner (talk) 02:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense? 
Talk:Händel-Gesellschaft

message: I am ejecting this from the article as needing to be substantiated. It is otherwise editorialising and unsourced opinion.The 103 volumes in the Händelgesellschaft publication were far from including the complete set of Handel's works, however it is understandable that many of Handel's manuscripts were either not known, or not available to Chrysander. There was likely also an economic reality in not being able to publish all of the available works of Handel. It is very difficult to get a precise list of missing works, so the following should be used with care, and the list of compositions by George Frideric Handel should be consulted for more information. Some of the works in the 103 volumes are difficult to identify (see "?" in the above Volumes table), and some works were only published in part. There are also works by Handel that do not have an HWV number.--Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing 
Talk:Raw (music magazine)

message: Looks to me like those involved in the mag have used this article to 'put the record straight' on what happened... needs a bit of cleaning up methinks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.31.97.129 (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  All a bit POV dont'cha think? 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Revolution in the Head: The Beatles' Records and the Sixties

message: The piece on the introductory essay is good, although I would dispute certain statements. But the point I would make here is that this section entirely dominates the page, which mis-represents the role of the essay in the book. The bulk of MacDonald's wok is the analysis of the beatles' songs, and the intro merely prefaces it. I would be against reducing the text since it is valuable, but more needs to be said of the book's main themes and content. 81.96.164.105 (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The essay 

message: As the contributor of the piece on the introductory essay, I am glad that this piece has not been reduced, especially since it is a crucial part of the book that places the appeal of the book way beyond Beatles fanatics. I would like to see more on the body of the book, but that is up to other contributors, and do not believe my piece ought to be penalized simply because of a shortage of contributions. The mini-essays on each Beatles track that compose the main part of the book contain much 'hardcore' musicological analysis that discusses keys, chords etc. This is fascinating in general, but lies way beyond my own understanding or competence in terms of comment or description. I would be glad to see more contributions that could do justice to making an assessment or description of this part of the book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.104.55.244 (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More needed 

message: from article - "He wrote a lengthy retrospective on Nick Drake, whom he personally knew when living in Cambridge in the early 1970s, and this led to writing a work about the Beatles.[1]"
linked obit doesn't claim that - mentions his piece on Nick Drake at the end of the article re. being part of his just published anthology The People's Music and pos thematic links to Ian's suicide), instead says earlier in the article re Revolution In The Head 
"It came out of the blue, in the sense that MacDonald had been virtually silent on the subject of popular music for several years before its publication." https://www.theguardian.com/news/2003/sep/08/guardianobituaries.artsobituaries
Also, his Nick Drake retrospective wasn't published til late '99/beginning of 2000 - according to here (& elsewhere) Revolution In The Head had already had two editions by then - '94 & '97). 86.187.167.223 (talk) 23:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mojo Nick Drake retrospective in '99 " led to writing a work about the Beatles" in 94? 

message: The Beatles At No. 1 - Ian McDonald (published 20 Nov 2003 according to amazon UK)
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Beatles-At-No-1/dp/1844134296
86.187.167.223 (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  There was a cut down version of the book focusing on singles that came out after his death
Talk:Select (magazine)

message: Did Stuart Maconie actually coin the term 'Britpop' in Select? The Britpop article itself states that John Robb used the term in Sounds in 1989, Select was founded in 1990--MartinUK (talk) 07:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The term 'Britpop'

message: "...was unique in that it started a journalistic movement to collect coverage of diverse musical trends into single publications."
Can someone elucidate what this actually means? Whatever it is, I'm pretty sure it's nonsense. AuntFlo (talk) 01:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pardon? 

message: I've long since trashed my old copies of Select, so I can't confirm this, but wasn't it billed as "The NME Monthly" or something like that? There's no mention of an NME connection in this article. phreakydancin (talk) 03:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That was Vox, I think.  Select was pretty much its own thing, even if it did feature the usual suspects. --—Vom (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: NME Connection
Talk:Moneydance

message: As the support person I can say that we have significant sales and while I'm not sure that satisfies notability requirements, I would suggest it might. especially given that other than Quicken and MS Money there are very few PFM softwares that offer the features or have as many users. - Ash@moneydance 71.209.137.98 03:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I came looking here for info on this very product, so it's "notable" to me. Whoever added this tag ought to try Googling the name.  Jeez.Dziemecki (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Some screenshots would be a welcome addition. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 01:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 

message: There is a contradiction between the text and the info box.  Which organization developed the app? Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 23:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:Sounds (magazine)

message: Shockingly bad page. John Robb did not come up with the expression "Britpop", and Sounds folded three years before Britop even happened. Sounds was a good paper - it deserves better than this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.50.152 (talk) 18:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: What was the ISSN for Sounds? - David Gerard (talk) 11:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ISSN?

message: https://www.facebook.com/soundsmag/ Here is the evidence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.50.127.186 (talk) 20:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds Is Back :)  

message: I propose to merge Sounds Obscurist chart into Sounds (magazine). There is practically nothing that can establish independent notability of the former article. A mention of the chart in the magazine article should suffice. -The Gnome (talk) 10:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Seem to recall the name of the paper being pronounced "zounds"? Anyone recall this?85.255.237.48 (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation
Talk:Essendon tram depot

message: It was named the Essendon tram depot because it is located in the boundaries of the old City of Essendon. Fauzi (talk) 11:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

message: Hello,
Please could you organise graffiti to be removed on you green brick painted staff room/ rest room .
Located on Flemington Rd parkville, opposite abbotsford st nth melb. 
It looks offensive.
Many thanks… 
Sonja . 120.21.102.199 (talk) 06:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graffiti
Talk:All About Love: New Visions

message: There is an over-reliance on primary sources in this article Tenuous tree (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More secondary sources needed 

message: The format and content doesn't fit the usual Wikipedia structure for books. There are also multiple grammar errors such as sentences beginning without capitalization. Overall, it wasn't up to most Wikipedia article standards.  TonyRoni (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and structural problems
Talk:Creative Evolution (book)

message: George Bernard Shaw expressed belief in evolution being driven by a "Life Force".   Is this the same system as Bergson's, with "life force" being a translation of  "elan vital"?  If so, since Shaw is more well-known than Bergson, it should have gotten a mention.
50.180.19.238 (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Shaw? 

message: Pretty fed up with this site right now so not going to correct this. This work is not about biological evolution. 108.183.102.223 (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiotic Misinterpretation
Talk:The Incoherence of the Incoherence

message: In the current version of the article, the following is stated:
: "In the 15th century, a strong refutation of Ibn Rushd's arguments was written by an Ottoman scholar, Mustafá ibn Yūsuf al-Bursawī (d. 1487, also known as Khwājazāda), defending al-Ghazali's views."
It is baseless, Khwajazada does not cite Ibn Rush, he does not even talk about him. even more, in the introduction section, Khwajazada explicitly states that he is gonna expose some of the wrongs of Al Ghazzali's Tehafitul Felasifa book. Why is this given as "strong refutation of Ibn Rush"? --81.213.215.83 (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khwajazada attacks, critiques, does not defend Ghazzali and does not talk about Ibn Rush at all 

message: There's only one source for this article, and it doesn't mention many of the topics brought up.  For instance, the article states that in "The Incoherence of the Philosophers" al-Ghazali was narrowly focused on a critique of Neoplatonist metaphysics, and not on sub-disciplines like mathematics, astronomy, and physics.  However, the sourced article makes no specific mention of metaphysics.
(I'm new to wikipedia editing so I apologize in advance if this isn't the best way to go about this.  The article on tagging mentioned that many see it as poor form to tag as opposed to fixing, so I decided it might be best to bring this up in the talk section.) Gxvx (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Templates

message: I happened across the templates listed in :Category:Selected philosophy anniversaries templates, and they seem to be abandoned. They were created in 2005, seemingly unedited since (except for being placed in the category), and are unused now. Since they are associated with this project, I wanted to ask whether they are still considered useful? I asked elsewhere and have gotten no reply, so I thought I would ask here. If they are not being used and there is no interest in using them, then I will nominate them for deletion. --RL0919 (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anniversary templates
Talk:WALG

message: Perhaps this article could be further expanded by contact some of the former employees as listed at the Radio Broadcast History - Radio People site.  This station has been on the air since 1941, there should be plenty of useful primary and secondary sources available. - Dravecky (talk) 02:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary sources 

message: Hello, this is Rick Stewart a.k.a. Ranger Rick Stewart a.k.a. BIG STU
I worked at WALG in the early 80's  Although I was only part time, I did get to work with some of the greats in WALG radio.  Dave Miller gave me my first radio job at the age of 16.  I then met greats like Bill Young and Steve Preston.  I thought I hit the BIG time when I started working with Chuck Bear @ WJAD 97 ROCK.  I then left Albany to California, Washington, Sacramento, Boise and most towns in between.  Thanks you Dave Miller for my first shot.  - 173.198.180.166 (relocated text from article to talk page Dravecky (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello
Talk:Das Kapital, Volume II

message: Indeed, a very sad sight to see, that the wealth of knowledge contained in Volume II of Capital is captivated by a mere sentence or two and that not a single individual in all of wikipedia spent the smallest amount of time articulating the main ideas of the marketplace found in volume 2: how value and surplus-value are realized. Its dramatis personae, not so much the worker and the industrial (as in Volume I), but rather the money owner (and money lender), the wholesale merchant, the trader and the entrepreneur or 'functioning capitalist.' Moreover, workers appear in Volume II, essentially as buyers of consumer goods and, therefore, as sellers of the commodity labour power, rather than producers of value and surplus-value (although, this latter quality, established in Volume I, remains the solid foundation on which the whole of the unfolding analysis is based).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.132.193 (talk) 19:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

message: From the intro: "Marx wrote in a letter sent to Engels on 30 April 1868: 'In Book 1. . . we content ourselves with the assumption that if in the self-expansion process €100 becomes €110...(Mandel, 1978, Intro to Vol. II of Capital)."
It is unlikely that Marx wrote the Euro symbol in 1868, or that Mandel published the symbol in 1978, seeing as the symbol itself was not invented until 1996.  I imagine the British pound sign was intended, but I do not have access to Mandel's edition to make sure. (or perhaps the character is mis-appearing on my computer, do others see the above currency symbol as the Euro symbol?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.84.35.145 (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marx and the Euro 
Talk:Department of Education (Philippines)

message: This article should contain references to EDCOM and PCER, two monumental reform efforts in Philippine education. There is no good online source for EDCOM 1991 but there's one for PCER. But sorry, I can't do it myself :) --Bentong Isles 03:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: EDCOM and PCER

message: Maybe the school has its own policy of collection agreed by concern parents. kindly check the schools policy if they have tnx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.23.3 (talk) 09:07, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re collection 
Talk:The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot

message: This article is linked to Naomi Wolf. Since she is the author isn't this enough? BingoDingo (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: it has enough links, so i removed the tag--Kmhkmh (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Tag 

message: I work for Chelsea Green Publishing. The correct title of the book is "The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot," without the "a." Also, the book is nonfiction, not a novel; the sentence beginning "This article is about the novel..." is incorrect.Spiderjeru (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 
Talk:Backtesting

message: * The quality of this page is miserable.  I recommend that it be subsumed in "Cross-validation", a serious statistical methodology.
* In my opinion backtesting is a serious statistical methodology.  I think the subject is most worthy of a page. Sirrom8 (talk) 15:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

message: The two pages Hindcast and Retrodiction appears to me as terminology variants of backtesting, merely applied to different fields. As backtesting is the dominant terminology in statistics and more applied sciences, I would suggest to merge those articles into the backtesting entry.--Joannes Vermorel (talk) 08:57, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok about Hindcast (merged!), but please check and vote here about  Retrodiction, that is another concept. --Krauss (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Hindcast and Retrodiction
Talk:Cúil Aodha

message: How does one change this article name back to Cúil Aodha? I'm here looking for information about Iarla Ó Lionáird, by far the most famous person from Cúil Aodha. I have never, ever heard of him as coming from a place named "Coolea" but for some bizarre reason I cannot move this town's name to its correct name. Captain Fearnought (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked Google, Google Books and a couple of media websites from Ireland, and the official Irish Cúil Aodha did seem more common (although not vastly more) so I went ahead with the move. Tameamseo (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't believe the Irish name Cúil Aodha is "far more common" than the English name Coolea, at least not on a national level. However, since I lived in Dublin and not Cork, my exposure to the English version probably causes a bias. I asked a few of my mates from back in Ireland to see what they said, and they also thought Coolea was more common. But again, the fact that they're from Dublin would affect my results! 
So I've compared their usage online:
Source                                                  	Coolea                                    	Cúil Aodha
Cork County Council website (using google’s site search)	152                                       	27
Cork county council Planning Enquiry system             	140                                       	0
Irish Independent                                       	71 (excluding the word “cheese”)          	127 (virtually all Irish-language results)
Boards.ie                                               	55                                        	11
Google.ie                                               	153000 (excluding cheese-related searches)	57800
Google.ie                                               	3540 for “Coolea, Macroom”                	914 for “Cúil Aodha, Macroom” and 43 for “Cúil Aodha, Maigh Chromtha”
rte.ie                                                  	4 (in English)                            	1 (in English)
Google Books                                            	2120 (not including the cheese!)          	704
I would have liked to include more national newspapers in my search but this wasn't possible due to their search functionality not working on my laptop for whatever reason, or because they simply had no results for the village, other than articles about Coolea cheese. A few searches on international websites only yielded results on Coolea cheese! 
I realise that in the village itself the Irish name is probably used, since it's in the Gaeltacht. But the naming guideline says: "If no name can be shown to be widely accepted in English, use the local name." I would consider Coolea to be widely accepted in English (otherwise the table above would have fewer results for the name in English), therefore there is no need to use the local name. But hey, I don't have a horse in this race, so let it be whatever it must be. ;-)
Missimack (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Law, Legislation and Liberty

message: "These ideas are then connected to two different forms of law: law proper, or "nomos" coinciding more or less with the traditional concept of natural law, which is an emergent property of social interaction,"
There is something very wrong here, because natural law theorists certainly did NOT hold that it was an "emergent property of social interaction."
GeneCallahan (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion on Natural Law
Talk:Fake

message: It reads like a 12 year old wrote the article.  Maybe deletion is in order.--70.253.203.15 03:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any childish formulations.--Patrick 09:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Been a while, but I have changed the opening sentence, mainly because I felt that it didn't realy fit into the manual of style. Hope it's better now. ۩ Dracion ۩  ✎ ✉ 10:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Rosses

message: "Na Rosann" is not an alternative rendering of Na Rossa, it is the genitive case of Na Rossa. e.g., Muintir na Rosann (The people of The Rosses).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.125.38 (talk) 12:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Na Rosann?
Talk:ARP4761

message: SAE is not Society of Automotive Engineers.  There used to be several SAE's under the umbrella of Auto, but in this case, SAE stood for Society of Aerospace Engineers.  Sometime ago, all SAE's became a single entity called "SAE" which is no longer an abbreviation. (Bjbuelow (talk) 03:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I created an info box to visually tie the SAE publications, following the Template:RTCA standard info box. Discussion might be found here. I am looking to highlight the connections illustrated in Figure 1 of ARP4754A. -- IveGoneAway (talk) 14:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box
Talk:Penicillin on Wax

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text from the Wikipedia article Tim Dog. -- But|seriously|folks  03:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution