lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Innsbruck Airport

message: Having visited Innsbruck often, I'm repeatedly struck by the number of planes that fly straight over the city centre during landing and takeoff. Presumably this is another result of the airport's difficult geographical location.46.189.28.214 (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested addition 
Talk:USS Newport News (CA-148)

message: This article was a huge mess with a huge chunk of text going over nearly every detail of a period of several years. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. When I read an encyclopedia I expect to find a summary, not a detailed diary. This is not what Wikipedia is meant for. I cut out the text and replaced it with a line about Vietnam operations. That should really suffice. Maybe a small paragraph on notable events *could* be added but things should be kept short. Also the article claims to have used public domain sources but doesn't specify them, perhaps someone can help and providing proper references. --Fogeltje 20:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was actually a bad move; we have ship article here that are very heavy on details for a period of several years and have recieved praise for that fact. This shortened version is not what Wikipedia is ment for (IMO). Your missing pd source is DANFS, from which 90% or more of the article will have come from. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that other ship articles are heavy detailed doesn't mean it should be, in my opinion they should be shortened as well. All the information seems to be directly copied from a free source, there is no harm in linking to that source in the external link section for all the details. But all those details have no place in an encyclopedia which should give a broad overview, the shortened version is exactly what Wikipedia is meant for. If you can directly to the page for the Newport News on DANFS, please add it to the external links. The article will give a broad overview of what the Newport News was and accomplished and those who really want all the details, can visit the DANFS entry directly.--Fogeltje 09:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I removed the neutrality dispute tag from the article as I see no comments here related to a neutrality dispute. --Brad (talk) 23:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality dispute tag

message: Decommissioned in 1975, not scrapped until 1993. I believe she remained in Philadelphia that whole time frame. To my recollection I believe the shipyard at least annually gave here a washdown to avoid a dusty appearance, and kept here moored at a corner where her bow was barely visible outside the main gate to the base. Many people would think she was a battleship first time the ship was seen. I was in Philadelphia last 1986 to 1987 for my ships overhaul Wfoj2 (talk) 12:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add a section to the article. It would be best if you could also provide a written source for the dates.--Fogeltje (talk) 13:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decommissioned - status and appearance.
Talk:Shōnan

message: The term "Shonan" was originally applied to the area around Oiso - not Enoshima.
The area from Kamakura to Zushi is often included in the "image" of Shonan among Tokyoites and non-locals because of the presence of beaches and beach houses in the summer, but many locals would see this as a stretch.  Shonan was originally used to refer to areas west of the Sagami river, but with the rising popularity of the Fujisawa beaches in the 20th century, the development of Hiratsuka into a large industrial city and eventually the devastation resulting from the 1945 bombing in Hiratsuka the "Shonan" brand eventually shifted eastwards to Chigasaki and Fujisawa.  (The mentioning of Enoshima Island while omitting the mention of Fujisawa city also stands out as a bit strange in this article.)  Few people today living east of the Sagami River consider Hiratsuka, Oiso, and Ninomiya to be included in "Shonan".  They would argue that the Seisho region begins beyond the Sagami River, although Hiratsuka City maintains pride in the Shonan name and seeks to promote that by intentionally including the word Shonan alongside the city's name.  "Shonan Hiratsuka Beach Park", "Shonan Hiratsuka Tanabata Matsuri", "Shonan Hiratsuka Fireworks Festival", etc., etc....  The "Shonan Hiratsuka" name is also employed by countless businesses, schools, facilities, etc within the city of Hiratsuka. 
I recommend the article be rewritten with some more factual content using actual sources and references.  It might also make sense to include the attempt that was made to unite the cities of Fujisawa, Chigsasaki, and Hiratsuka and the towns of Samukawa, Oiso, and Ninomiya into a city called "Shonan".  The movement failed and they remain three separate cities and three separate towns, but this was a significant part of "Shonan history".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Todd Gorman (talk • contribs) 06:34, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oiso - not Enoshima 

message: jesus wanrs u to die an hokk him away an in 174.251.170.90 (talk) 00:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  powerd cons tombes jesus whoke pabxemic
Talk:List of Namekians in Dragon Ball

message: Is "finger blast" seriously an attack in Dragon Ball Z? I thought it was just what I did with that girl in sixth grade. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 07:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You did "what?!" to a girl in sixth grade? That seems very innapropiate... Lord Sesshomaru 23:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "finger blasted"? 

message: In Japanese, 最長老 is pronounced Sai[cho]ro/Sai[chō]rō, not Sai[chu]ro. If it is not an imposition, please edit it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.185.144.203 (talk) 03:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anyone know what Guru's name actually is in the Viz manga? We should use that name, ya know... Lord Sesshomaru 23:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really all that important. I've romanized it to Saichoro so be happy. PL(DB) 21:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sai[chu]ro?
Talk:Drepanidae

message: Hello wikipedians! I'm proposing the possibility of merging Drapetodes deumbrata into this article, Drepanidae. I think that, since both of these articles are stubs, that Drepanidae is a family of Drapetodes deumbrata, and that Drepanidae is a more complete article, that they should be merged together under one article that's just called Drepanidae. Once more moth types are added to the main article, including Drapetodes deumbrata, readers can gain a more clear, non-fragmented picture of this topic, without going to three-sentence stub articles. As always, let me know what you think of this proposal in this talk page, and, if you want to be bold you can always help by merging it yourself if there aren't any disagreements and I haven't gotten around to it! ~the.one.and.the.only~ (talk) 03:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Extant species almost invariably get their own articles (as opposed to extinct ones); hence species lists in genus articles are always set up as redlinks, in the expectation that articles will be created eventually. So no, merging this is not something we'd normally do, and I see no specific reason to do it in this case. It would be particularly inadvisable to try and merge this to a family article given that there are dozens and dozens of genera! But even merging to Drapetodes does not make sense. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, okay! It looks like I was not familiar with best practices on these types of articles - thanks for the clarification and context! ~the.one.and.the.only~ (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm taking off the merge notice then, if you don't mind :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:30, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: sounds good! ~the.one.and.the.only~ (talk) 16:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Portal talk:Architecture/New article announcements

message: I suggest the newest articles should be announced at the top. This is a standard practice of all such boards. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Please support my request at Wikipedia:Bot requests#New articles bot. This will save all reporters much time.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's an experiment at User:AlexNewArtBot to automatically find new articles which are of interest to a specific WikiProject.  I've created a ruleset for architecture at User:AlexNewArtBot/architecture, and new articles should appear listed on the portal page here.  Please feel free to add new keywords to the ruleset (instructions at User:AlexNewArtBot, or ask me, and give feedback on its accuracy. Warofdreams talk 19:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Objection to the way the bot stuff was inserted above manually edits. Probably, it's time to separate the bot list into a separate window (it completely obscures "old" manual list).NVO 19:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to say that I think a better idea would be to find out why your article on melnikov wasn't getting identified by the bot and then realised you had rewritten it rather than created it afresh. Really the 'New article announcements' should be just that - we can't include every bit of work being done to architecture articles in this list. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm unconcerned as to whether the bot's list is at the top or the bottom, or on a different page.  However, feedback on its operation would be most welcome. Warofdreams talk 01:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New articles bot

message: I have been contributing to the manual listing for the past few years but have decided to discontinue this work as AlexNewArtBot is increasingly reliable and the number of page viewers is relatively low. Others are of course welcome to continue adding new articles to the list.--Ipigott (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual listing
Talk:Engrailed (moth)

message: Wouldn't this species properly be called the "engrailed moth"? 
And what is with the emphasis on the definite article in the title?  Anything can be "engrailed" (the word means something with edges engraved with curved notch patterns, giving the appearance of serration).
71.245.8.24 18:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Naming conventions for British moths are charmingly archaic - not all sources include the definite article as an integral part of the common name but most do and absolutely none add the word "moth" to the common name. As for capitalization, that's opening a can of worms.... Richard Barlow 08:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "The" Engrailed?

message: Shall we try to get these down to the species level when possible and either remove hosts or source them? Plumpurple (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Host plants

message: Is the photo wrong, or is it incorrect to say that the caterpillar is  greyish? Because I would say that is a picture of a reddish caterpillar, not a greyish one. MrDemeanour (talk) 17:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greyish caterpillar 
Talk:Potter wasp

message: thw potter wasp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.124.226.130 (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  tgty 

message: Shouldn't it be Eumeninae? Judging from Wikipedia pages in other languages as well as Greek etymology (Eumenes-like and not children of Eumenes), this is probably a typo (and a play by Aeschylus :-) )  Avocadohead (talk) 02:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eumenidae?
Talk:Fairyfly

message: Well then... this page could use a little work. Citations and a little clarity of discussion would be a good place to start - some of the text is incomprehensible. I'll do what I can when I get a moment, but I am currently working on other projects. Aderksen (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I came here after reading the following news story:
:
I just wanted to say that this article was an enjoyable read and it is in a good state. Thanks for your efforts on this. Regards, RJH (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you :) I have expanded the article some more with the PhysOrg article. Cheers.-- Obsidi♠n Soul 07:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 

message: The genus Gonatocerus  is recently splitted up in 14 genera (see also de:Genatocerini):
* John T. Huber: World reclassification of the Gonatocerus group of genera (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Zootaxa, 3967, S. 1–184, 2015 
Maybe this should be mentioned in the article.
Greetings --Josef Papi (talk) 13:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: new systematics

message: The link to the genus Kubja was dangling when it was added, but now points at an article about a minor figure from Hindu mythology (which is not a fairy fly).  I'm not sure how these things are typically resolved. Ichoran (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If a name has a primary use as title of another article, then it's fixed by creating a disambiguation title for the taxonomic article - in this case, the wasp article will be Kubja (wasp), and I've fixed it. If "kubja" had instead been, say, an alternative spelling, or something other than the title of the article it linked to, then the taxonomic article would normally take precedence, and the other use would be disambiguated instead. Thanks for the heads up. Dyanega (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kubja link now resolves incorrectly
Talk:Red Turban Rebellions

message: There seems to be some confusion in the article as to the color of the rebels' turbans (and thus the correct name of the rebellion itself).  I'm fairly certain it's supposed to be "Yellow Turban" however.  But, my early-Ming history is rusty, and I've no ready access to a reliable source, or I'd edit this myself.  Could someone please confirm or deny, and edit accordingly? Chang E 18:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no, no. See Yellow Turban Rebellion. A difference of 1200 years, I don't understand how in the world you are confused with it. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  16:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red or Yellow Turban?

message: This article should be revamped with more information and a conflict infobox. 
http://books.google.com/books?id=iN9Tdfdap5MC&pg=PA576#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=067On0JgItAC&pg=PA604#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=hi3FGnfecBoC&pg=PA254#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=ROQVzWT2iiUC&pg=PA14#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=yzWsAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA334#v=onepage&q&f=false
04:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp article 

message: Ispah Rebellion
Rajmaan (talk) 06:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other rebellions during the Yuan dynasty 

message: Remove the link to Red Turban Rebellion (1854–1856) in the infobox. It is not relevant here. 216.8.145.203 (talk) 19:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like a reasonable disambiguation link, so I'd be inclined to keep it. What's the rationale for removal? Simonm223 (talk) 20:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is about 19th-century events, while this page is about 14th-century events. I also just noticed that the infobox has two notes that do not refer to anything... I'm not sure where they came from. 216.8.145.203 (talk) 21:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 December 2018
Talk:Waterberg Biosphere

message: Needs a Commons category. Richard001 (talk) 11:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Starting about the year 1300 AD, Nguni settlers arrived with new technologies, including the ability to build dry-stone walls, which techniques were then used to add defensive works to priornts to their Iron Age forts, some of which walls survive to today."
What is that? Tidaress 09:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Typo, thanks. It is fixed now. Anlace 19:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Priornts" 
Talk:Mogollon Rim

message: I was under the impression that this work was set in Utah, which is rather far from the Mogollon Rim, while I can believe that the atmosphere may be related, can someone give a citation to this?  Moheroy 08:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zane Grey and Riders of the Purple Sage

message: As far as the Board of Geographic Names is concerned, the Mogollon Rim doesn't extend even to the NM border, much less to include the Mogollon Mountains. It could be argued that they both are part of the same large complex of high terrain, but the Mountains are quite far from the region where the Rim is rim-like. So, I changed the approximate length and clarified the difference between Rim and Mountains. If someone has a source that is as good as/better than the BGN and says that the Mountains really are part of the Rim, feel free to edit or discuss. -- Spireguy 04:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rim vs. Mountains 

message: This section of article should now be updated:
"...eastern portion of the Mogollon Rim was the site of Arizona's largest-known wildfire, during June 2002, the 470,000 acre (1,900 km²) Rodeo-Chediski fire."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aztrailblazzer (talk • contribs) 14:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallow Fire now largest in AZ history, not Rodeo-Chediski 
Talk:Dostoevsky and Parricide

message: Is this meant to be a category page? --Paul A 08:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:Toledo, Cebu

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alaminos City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: 
I believe Toledo is now classified as a second class city. There are numerous references, just do a Google search.Ppetrel (talk) 09:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: It was suggested here that parts of this page may have been copied from here. As far as I can see, that page was created after the content was in our article. It's possible that both were copied from some unidentified common source, or that the Toledo City page was copied from here. In that case, the page cannot be considered a reliable source for the content, which I've therefore removed. I also removed content sourced to this page, for the same reason. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Restroom attendant

message: I think this presents a pretty global view of the topic, especially for its length, so I'm removing the tag.  Add it back and talk here if you disagree.  --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 06:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  World View 

message: I support the merge of the toilet granny article into this one. A section on terms used for toilet attendants around the world seems like it could be useful Trxi (talk) 06:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of "[[toilet granny]]" 

message: The ones in the US don't actually do any kind of upkeep on the facilities. They just attempt to hit patrons up for tips for things that they don't need.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.160.118.174 (talk) 00:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In America

message: This article needs to discuss which countries are likely to have washroom attendants, whether in major cites or throughout the society.  Reify-tech (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize
Talk:1924 English cricket season

message: while England won its first home series since 1921
Ambiguous. The reader won't know whether it is intended to mean the first home series since 1921, or the first home series win since 1921. Tintin (talk) 08:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I will take it on myself to modify the wording. JH 19:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous
Talk:List of Christian theologians

message: Coverage of important theologians is poor. There is no mention of major figures such as Gordon Kaufman. I am not competent to write articles on the topic, but I have read enough to notice that there is a bias toward minor figures.
Manny eastern theologian are missing!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.80.42.99 (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coverage

message: I've never heard of Gordon Kaufman, I don't think that he's that major of a theologian. 
Graham Ward, whom I've also never heard of, links to the soccer player Graham Ward, it needs to link to the proper page. Can someone with the knowledge to do that do so?
24.18.249.218 (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham Ward 

message: This list is (delibertately?) exclusively European, not including is even major Christian theologians from Africa (Coptic Church) or Asia (Nestorian Church). As such, it is proposed that its title be changed to "List of European Christian theologians".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 0XQ (talk • contribs) 14:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for change of title for this page 

message: These entries don't give any indication of why they are included in this list. HokieRNB 06:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  entries need substantiation 

message: Why is Rudolf Bultmann included in this list? I thought that he was a New Testament scholar, rather than a theologian. Vorbee (talk) 20:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Rudolf Bultmann

message: Would it be beneficial to this list to list the theologians' denominations and theological movements? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denomination and movement? 

message: Since there is no specific "list of Christian Bible scholars", should we include or exclude Bible scholars of this list ? Whatever the answer, some direction should be added on the top of the page about that ---Telikalive (talk) 13:48, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the topics are distinct, plus list of Christian Bible scholars is probably notable enough to merit a list of its own. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include or exclude Bible scholars of this list ?
Talk:Johann Nestroy

message: Re  SONGS.  The article speaks of Nestroy's songs elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot. A truly brilliant formulation. Nestroy would have loved it. He would have worked it right into one of his plays. We can easily imagine some cobbler or locksmith who has become a "marchandmode" postulating about Mozart having written his music for elaborating the theme or helping on with the plot.--BZ(Bruno Zollinger) 08:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Das is a verruckte Idee
Talk:La Luz del Mundo

message: User SebastianDrawsStuff has made several changes to the article without providing edit summaries, including wholesale deletion of sourced material. It's hard to parse through all these edits without understanding the reasoning for them. A lot of the edits seem to be to change La Luz del Mundo to LLDM, which to my knowledge is used informally inside the organization. I looked at several English and Spanish language sources (particularly news media) and did not find many using the acronym. I did find other acronyms beyond LLDM though, such as LDM, LLMC, and TLOTW. With that in mind, this article should not use acronyms. BadHombres (talk) 00:36, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits Without Summary and Use of Acronyms