lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eryngium foetidum

message: i wrote the section about the genetic trait. I read this on cilantro, and I myself have this trait, together with my mother. I never tasted this plant while growing up, so education cannot play a role in this, making a genetic trait highly likely. Adding this ingredient makes food inedible for me, while I normally have very few aversions against any taste. Any link to this would be highly appreciated. The sentence about Linnaeus having this trait is pure speculation, but suggests itself. --Sarefo 22:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  foetidum 

message: On the intro paragraph, it says Puerto Rico calls it recao. So does the Dominican Republic. But I don;t know how to edit the main page so I'm putting it here.
Source: I'm Dominican.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.107.110 (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is called Recao in the Dominican Republic too 

message: The German wikipedia redirects Cilantro to Eryngium foetidum while here in the English one Cilantro is said to be Coriandrum sativum.  Which one is correct?
:This has now been fixed. Cilantro redirects to Echter Koriander ("true coriander", C. sativum). In addition, the headnote points to a disambiguation page which mentions Echter Koriander and Langer Koriander ("long coriander", E. foetidum). --ABehrens (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cilantro vs. Culantro 

message: 70.83.16.244 (talk) Corrected a formatting error were all text in last 2/3rd of last paragraph was erroneously italicized and corrected poor grammar from the direct quote "It is not much familiar in other parts of India." by removing this butchered English and paraphrasing with a more readable equivalent. Also, made clear that the last paragraph was a quote from three (3) Indian agricultural scientists as listed in citation. 70.83.16.244 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Names
Talk:Cicuta

message: Here there is a mention of C. Maculata but in the Poison Hemlock article there is C. Maculatum. Which is right?24.83.178.11 09:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poison Hemlock Latin Name

message: In this article C. maculata stands for Cicuta maculata, but Poison Hemlock is Conium maculatum. They was earlier in the same genus, but later splitted into two genuses. So that's the reason, and they're two totaly diffrent species.
It's said here that Socrates died from drinking Cicuta, by what I have read he died from drinking a mixture from Poison Hemlock (Conium maculatum) and Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum). Both is relaxaing the musclature (coniin and opium).
By what I have read death normally occours between one to two hours after intake of the plant. Consider that the plant material has to go through the digestive system, before the main part of the chemicals go into the bloodstream. And this is even slower in ruminants and horses, so I really have a strong doubt that livestock have died after 15 minutes after inntake.
Obscurus.Odius (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Water Hemlock
Talk:The Button-Down Mind of Bob Newhart

message: The First Family (album) was also a comedy album and won the Grammy just two years later in 1963. --John_Abbe (talk) 09:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I haven't watched the referenced show, The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, so I hope this isn't a dumb question. While Newhart's album was recorded and released in 1960, he had been working on his material since 1956, but not as typical stand-up. Is it possible that the point of the episode was Joel stealing material that wouldn't have been well known enough yet for him to get in trouble, and therefore not anachronistic at all?
See https://music.avclub.com/the-surprisingly-subversive-album-that-changed-stand-up-1798238091  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philomorph (talk • contribs) 15:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronism?
Talk:Anthriscus sylvestris

message: This does not look at all what I was taught was cow parsley when growing up in Derbyshire:  
250px-Anthriscus_sylvestris_Fluitenkruidbloemen.jpg.  The version I knew had the florets joined up into a flatter single carpet top.
Is is one variant of many?  If so, it should say so, rather than claiming to be "Cow Parsley"  Simhedges (talk) 06:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cow Parsley Photo 
Talk:Waterman Mountain

message: I removed a statement that claimed that the mountain was named for Liz Waterman. Gudde in California Place Names states that "According to tradition in the Forest Service, the mountain was named for Robert Waterman [...]". If the claim about it being named for Lady Waterman can be supported by reliable sources I will not object.  –droll [chat] 03:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name
Talk:Osmorhiza

message: I am removing the text that seems particular to an indeterminate species of Osmorhiza.  It's generallly confusing to have such information on a page for a group of plants, as a genus, and the situation is exacerbated for medicinal herbs with dangerous lookalikes. ENeville (talk) 04:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing specific text
Talk:Lawrence Donegan

message: I think 'Iron in the Soul' was serialised as BBC Radio Four]'s 'Book of the Week' late in 2006.
Any confirmations?
He is unfortunately no longer working for The Guardian. See his Twitter-Timeline...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.130.207.201 (talk) 20:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bupleurum chinense

message: The ethnobotany section seems to be written by a supporter of Chinese medicine, and even goes as far as to give "medical" advice. Shandolad (talk) 00:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ethnobotany" section needs to be revised and improved 

message: The picture is of a different plant. 91.159.240.47 (talk) 08:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture is wrong!
Talk:AD 808

message: I thought that, in the Kelis song, she says "i'm back with an 808" because she uses the 808 drum machine.82.5.94.8 23:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: What I have done:
:The Disambiguation section was removed without explanation, and since the page 808 (Disambiguation) does not exist, I have put the Disambiguation section back in the article.
The dilemma:
:The Disambiguation section may need to be split into a new article named 808 (Disambiguation), but I do not know how to decide if this is warranted.
VegKilla (talk) 20:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - A disambig is definitely needed. In general, a separate page is needed to disambiguate three or more topics (for two topics, you can use  or a similar template). NF24(radio me!) 21:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Angelica gigas

message: I flagged obovate flowers with {dubious}- obovate refers to leaf form, never flowers.--Wuerzele (talk) 00:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[obovate]] flowers ?? 

message: A very strange thing: 
In desktop view there is no chapter title for the Chemical components section – in mobile view there IS ! o.O :-D o.o 
 
What is the reason? 2A02:3031:13:A8B4:1:2:159B:B974 (talk) 04:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is chapter title?
Talk:Ligusticum

message: Why was "or Umbelliferae" removed? The systems have not yet been reconciled. This should not have been removed without discussion. Badagnani 06:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umbelliferae 
Talk:While loop

message: Regarding "Very similar to C and C++, but the while loop could also have been written on one line:":
Why is this example used? Apparently to show off Perl's compactness compared to C and C++, except that C and C++ can do it in one line also, just as compact. That part should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codehead1 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perl example 

message: following statements have the same meaning:
"while true;"    =    "while : ;"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.15.238.175 (talk) 07:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  bash - while loop , additional hints
Talk:Anginon

message: Needs a map with geographic distribution, some sample images, and pages for each species. Strangely, every single species has a page in Cebuano (a Filipino language with 21 million speakers). If anyone has any idea why that is for a genus which apparently is endemic to southern Africa, I'd love to know.
Tropicos has images of at least some of the species but I'm not sure what the image rights are there and I don't want to cause trouble.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prometheus720 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs map, image, and pages for species
Template talk:Compromised account

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Maser (Talk!) 06:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Compromised account}}]] 

message: Shouldn't we include instructions for the hapless user, something that will explain to them how to get their account back as well as other useful recommendations?  Rklawton (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The legitimate user needs to create a new account, and then edit the template's optional parameter to link the old account to the new account. Jesse Viviano (talk) 17:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What about accounts that have public/private verification?  Rklawton (talk) 01:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is done, the original account can be reclaimed. I did not think about that. Jesse Viviano (talk) 03:11, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions

message: Like the sock puppet templates, would you please add a global locking notice, so that it'll look like this?
2607:FB90:5E83:CC74:9459:7AB9:47AE:C9C0 (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, option added. However, not the default since many editors are only blocked locally. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a global locking parameter to this template
Talk:Maureen Brennan

message: This page is perfectly notable -- see discussion re Sharon Hollows' AfD.O'Donoghue 23:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: What does this term mean?  Could it be explained in the article?  Thanks.Mseliw 13:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Special Measures?

message: I've gone through and removed some biased edits that were made to the page in support of Dame Brennan after the recent hearing against her. I'm monitoring the local news and, as far as I know, no decision has been made yet on the case. Regardless, it isn't factual to call the hearings a "witch hunt" or refer to them as "dedicated" and "exemplary".94.169.46.11 (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased edits
Talk:Hodges Gardens, Park and Wilderness Area

message: Currently the Hodges Gardens' board of trustees and the Louisiana Office of State Parks are negotiating for taking Hodges Gardens into the Louisiana State Parks system.  To date the Louisiana General Assembly (ie State Legislature) and the Governor have approved it by resolution, all that is left is for the Hodges Gardens' trustees and the Office of State Parks to finalize all the details. --Avazina 23:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hodges Gardens to be taken into the [[List_of_Louisiana_state_parks|LA Office of State Parks]]
Talk:Berula

message: The sentence that links to this page from Apium nodiflorum says that Berula (which that page refers to as "lesser water parsnip") is poisonous, but this page doesn't say whether it's poisonous or not.  IMO, if it's poisonous, this article should mention it, or if not, the Apium nodiflorum article should be fixed. M-1 (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisonous?
Talk:Bayside Marketplace

message: When you hear that "Wikipedia doesn't accept advertising", they clearly never read this article. Cyberflag1 (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia doesn't accept advertising
Talk:Eleutherococcus

message: the statement that they 'may have similar qualities to ginsengs and more research is needed' is complete nonsense. there is already an enormous body of research on this. a simple google search would have demonstrated this to you.why dont you do your homework before you make your statements?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cleobolus (talk • contribs) 20:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Tetrapanax

message: My wife is currently using this stuff to help promote lactation, there are a few web sites that describe this online.
http://taoism.about.com/od/herbsthatdraindampness/g/Tong_Cao.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.236.241.84 (talk) 13:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Medicinal Use
Talk:Schefflera

message: The following bit from the article (as of May 2007) is incomprehensible to most people.
"The Circumscription of the genus has varied greatly. Phylogenetic studies have shown that the widely used broad circumscription as a pantropical genus of over 700 species is polyphyletic, but it remains to be seen how this will affect the classification of the genus.
GardenQuad 00:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained technical jargon 

message: When was Dizygotheca foldeded into Schefflera?  Dizygotheca elegantissima had a ring that Schefflera elegantissima just doesn't have --72.94.154.15 (talk) 01:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dizygotheca 

message: I have been having our sheffelera in the house for almost two years and it is getting too large for inside but I am concerned about planting outside.  Suggestions? 2600:8807:2D17:A900:3094:37C3:B8B7:9E2C (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can Sheffelera be planted outdoors?
Talk:× Fatshedera

message: I was surprised to find an important fact about Fatshedera missing from this page. I had read it a few days ago on the page for Hedera, under the Taxonomy section:
" . . .  × Fatshedera lizei, a cross between Fatsia japonica and Hedera hibernica. This hybrid was produced once in a garden in France in 1910 and never successfully repeated, the hybrid being maintained in cultivation by vegetative propagation."
There are two footnotes given:
Huxley, A., ed. (1992). New RHS Dictionary of Gardening 2: 60. Macmillan .
Metcalfe, D. J. (2005). Biological Flora of the British Isles no. 268 Hedera helix L. Journal of Ecology 93: 632–648
Having little experience editing main articles, I leave it to a better hand to include this, if it seems worthwhile.  GoldRecluse (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solitary hybridization
Talk:Dendropanax

message: I switched the spelling of "morbiferus" to "morbifera." 
When I searched on Google for "Panax morbiferus" it corrected my spelling to "morbifera" and returned 768 links. When I insisted on the "morbiferus" spelling there was not even one hit. This is in line with some printed literature in English I have from Agency for Jeju Plant Resources (Republic of Korea), which uses the "morbifera" spelling. I checked several of the Google links and it is clear that "morbifera" is the accepted spelling on the internet. No idea what's in the libraries of the world, but this change is certain not to create confusion.
I created a stub for the species, and will fill it out as I get more information -- first of all I need to find the plant's range.
Eugeneccampbell (talk) 16:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Heptapleurum actinophyllum

message: Didierea madagascariensis is also known as the "Octopus tree".  How can a "disambiguation" list be added?
Kirtag Hratiba (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a disambiguation page at Octopus tree, thanks.--Melburnian (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Octopus tree

message: What on earth is this sentence about?
"The up to 1,000 flowers produced by the plant generate large amounts of nectar, attracting honey-eating birds which then spread the seeds."
Honey ≠ Nectar
Flowers ≠ Seeds
Why should "honey-eating" birds be attracted by nectar?
Why and how should the attraction of confused honey eating birds to the flowers "then spread the seeds"? Are fresh flowers produced nearby as the fruits ripen, while the fruits are also sticky or barbed?
Perhaps someone familiar with the plant could clarify this sentence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.8.64.33 (talk) 02:24, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecology: sequential nonsequiturs
Talk:Panax pseudoginseng

message: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=6758090
--222.67.213.124 (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this mean...??? 

message: Only Panax pseudoginseng ssp. Japonicus exists in google scholar
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=%22Panax+pseudoginseng+ssp%22&btnG=Search
Why is that???--222.67.206.72 (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what the issue being raised above is. The different editions of the botanical code don't change the rules all that much; it's highly unlikely that any changes in the code over the years would mandate a change in the name of this relatively well-known plant (rule changes in different editions of the code are more likely to bear on obscure names). Botanical nomenclature is confusing but any confusion regarding this plant has nothing to do with the codes. The recent Flora of China considers P. pseudoginseng and P. notoginseng to be different species; botanists may have previously considered these to be the same species (synonyms), but I'd be inclined to follow the Flora of China as an authoritative reference.Plantdrew (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The naming system for this variety is very messy.... 

message: All of the content in this article, aside from the taxobox and the title itself, cover Panax notoginseng (or Panax in general). P. pseudoginseng is a distinct species. I'm moving the P. notoginseng content to that title. Plantdrew (talk) 04:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting [[Panax notoginseng]]
Talk:Analemmatic sundial

message: Reference number 2 is not a reliable source.
It is a link to "Sunclocks - Human Sundials, using your own shadow to tell correct time" which is a commercial web site that sells sundial designs.
Johnmahorney (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   reliable sources  

message: This article has an incorrect statement:
"Accurate dials of this type are popular in public places, using a ball at the tip of a flagpole as the nodus, with the sundial face painted on or inlaid in the pavement."
Analemmatic sundials have a movable gnomon - therefore a fixed flagpole cannot be used as the gnomon.
Johnmahorney (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   incorrect statement 

message: This article confuses two separate concepts:
* An analemmatic sundial, in which a shadow of a vertical gnomon falls on hour markers placed on an ellipse. The position of the vertical gnomon changes during the year according to the sun's declination.
* A sundial in which a ray of the sun, or a shadow point of the sun, falls on an analemma marked on a dial or other surface.
These are two different things, and the article needs to be improved to clearly distinguish between them.
Cmcqueen1975 (talk) 03:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of definitions
Talk:Manzanita Speedway

message: I think that the question of ownership was not properly addressed as The Kimbros had to go to court to get possession of the property. The property was owned for many years by the Kimbors and operated by Keth Hall, who was not paying anything to them. A court action finally forced Hall from the track and the Kimbros hired Denny Woods to operate the track. Woods left after having been robbed of the gate proceeds late one night after an event. Then the track was sold to Bobby Martin who made many improvements to the track fences and stands before he completely suprised everyone by announcing it's closure and sale in 2009. Corumplex (talk) 01:40, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 2014 comment
Talk:Diuresis

message: 141.136.136.172 (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

message: First of all production of glomerular filtrate is 125 ml/min according to most current major textbooks in physiology and the standard value used in practise. This equals to 180 L of glomerular filtrate per day.
Second of all aldosterone is not a true antidiuretic. Vassopressin is the antidiuretic, without it no water retention occurs, it is the necessary factor. However aldosterone can secondarily lead to greater water retention because water follows by osmotis due to increased absorption of Na+.
Third of all, in the field of medicine new resarch is done continuisly, and our understanding of many things change thereby. Should a article be based on a 27 year old textbook as reference? Medicine is not in the same place it was then, it is far more updated.
[anonymous]
If Diuresis is the increased production of urine, how can polyuria be increased diuresis?
Redzebra 11:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First

message: All the relevant stubs that were listed here have now been merged into a single article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various stubs merged 

message: Can anyone with knowledge of the subject kindly add information about what effect any SURGERY has on diuresis? Surgery seems to cause acute osmotic diuresis. - 103.123.36.175 (talk) 10:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgery
Talk:Dix–Hallpike test

message: the section on + test states that up and down nystagmus results from a cns lesion. then it goes on to further localize these to particular semi-circular canals. do you  the canals to be part of the cns? i've always considered tyhem part of the inner ear, which, in turn, i don't think of as the cns. clarify? correct me?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toyokuni3 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From a clinical (i.e. physician's) viewpoint, CNS here means brain, and SCC means peripheral. CNS localization implies that I need to target the brain for further workup, e.g. MRI. Pollira (talk) 19:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: CNS vs. Semi-circular canals

message: when the left ear (for example) is down during the Dix-Hallpike maneuver, the posterior semicircular canal is in the vertical plane, and upbeating + torsional  nystagmus is caused by BPPV in the left posterior SCC. However, the RIGHT (contralateral) ANTERIOR SCC is also in the vertical plane, and downbeating + torsional nystagmus would be attributed to RIGHT sided anterior SCC BPPV. The text here is in error.  Pollira (talk) 19:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which ear affected with downbeat nystagmus. Probable error.
Talk:Dromotropic

message: Does epinephrine have any significant dromotropic effects?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.85.147.230 (talk) 23:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One can read in the article "A dromotropic agent is one which affects the conduction speed (in fact the magnitude of delay[1]) in the AV node, and subsequently the rate of electrical impulses". These are two separate things, one is the rate and the other one is the delay. The rate is not a consequence of the delay, so the sentence is wrong.
Also, the first reference is ridiculous.
Struck89 (talk) 08:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrelated cause and consequence?