lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aminoacyl-tRNA

message: I fleshed out this article mainly with good old Stryer :) Sakkura 23:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: References should be added to both the Synthesis and Drug Targeting subsections of the aminoacyl-tRNA article. Certain pieces of information within the initial section remain uncited. For the first reference cited, Biochemistry by Stryer, page numbers utilized for the article's information should be provided. Information referenced within the article appears to be both accurate and properly cited. Sgdixon (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:56, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Apoptosome

message: I deleted a sentence claiming that the apoptosome could not be activated by the extrinisc death receptor pathway. this is false, it can be activated by tbid. See here: http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/277/43/40760 for an example. I'll add more about this to the page later. Brandon1001 (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  extrinsic pathway 

message: The actual parts of the apoptosome should be pointed out clearlier. Cheers, --84.161.247.7 11:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear 

message: This section shouldn't be here at all, it's irrelevant to the apoptosome itself, or such relevancy haven't been shown. InternetowyGołąb (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "P53 mutations in Apoptosis"
Talk:Armadillo repeat

message: Cclehnen (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

message: It may be interesting to include in the article why it was named the Armadillo repeat
I put a context tag on the article because it doesn't even give us any sort of explanation as to what a repeat even is.  216.93.234.239 (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requests for more information
Talk:Ewhurst, Surrey

message: This section on cricket must be the most boring ever. Does anyone mind if I cut some of it? SuzanneKn 22:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about boring, but even to a cricket enthisiast like myself it seems disproportionate. There surely must be something to say about the village beyond cricket and showbiz personalities. JH (talk page) 15:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Boring boring. No one seems to have got rid of this rubbish on the cricket club so I will DeCausa (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cricket
Talk:Β-Hydroxybutyric acid

message: What is the clinical significance of the presence of Beta-Hydroxybutyrate in blood. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.178.93.3 (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laboratory 

message: I wish someone knowlegeable would add information about the odor of this chemical, and the mechanism and routes of excretion from the human body. Does it mix with acetone to modify the breath odor that would have been associated with acetone alone? David Spector (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odor 

message: Compare the structure of BHB to what structurally defines a ketone: "Ketones feature a carbonyl group (C=O) bonded to two other carbon atoms." Notice on the right side of the posted skeletal structure of BHB, that the carbonyl group is bound to one carbon atom (R on the ketone page example), but also an OH (R') group, which does not contain carbon. Thus, β-hydroxybutyric acid is not a ketone.
I hope that clarifies things. Erebusthedark (talk) 23:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, its formally a beta hydroxy acid. Much the chemistry for this article seems to be confused. I think that when it's referring to ketones it means acetoacetic acid, which can be formed via 3-hydroxybutyrate_dehydrogenase. More references required I think. Project Osprey (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BHB is not a ketone 

message: JCEM review: doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa370 JFW | T@lk 21:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metabolism role
Talk:FADD

message: For all the poor/meaningless nomenclature, Fas is yet the name of the receptor. The gene that encodes the receptor is TNFRSF6, and thus fas is the processed TNFRSF6 gene product. The literature still pretty much to the terminology Fas and Fas Ligand (FasL).
So what is missing in the article.
1. FADD has a death domain, which allows it to interact with other proteins that have death domains like TRADD, and the death domains of TNF-Recpetor like proteins with appropriate death domains. Examples are Fas, TRADD, etc.
2. FADD has a death effector domain (DED) which allows it to interact with other proteins with death effector domains. Examples, Caspase-8, Caspase-10.
So what is needed is a far less complicated graphic illustrating the -DD-DED- structure of FADD.
PB666 yap 02:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sudestada

message: The article states that the Sudestada is most likely to happen in late fall and winter, what months of the year would this mean exactly given that this is happening in the southern hemisphere?
Tang72 22:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now per reference.--Darius (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Florigen

message: I gave the article a pretty major rewrite and upgraded it to start class, although there's still a fair way to go with it. Here's a suggested to do list: 
* Expand Mechanism section to include more detailed information (esp. on regulation of CO expression and FT protein production/translocation)
* Image showing complete pathway
* Full research history
* Graphs showing accumulation of CO mRNA, CO protein and FT mRNA during long and short days
* Add new section on conservation of florigen between species
Any help/comments welcome. Ribrob (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite (April 2009)

message: The introduction currently (February 2012) states that florigen is still a mystery, but the article then seem to explain quite succintly what it is. So is it still a mystery? If so,  I think the article should explain why.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.185.56.99 (talk) 11:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's still a mystery: although we've figured out a lot of what florigen does -- assuming it's a single molecule, which is not conclusively proven -- we haven't actually found florigen itself. So we don't know what it is. DS (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it still a mystery? Why?
Talk:Errenzhuan

message: I'm not qualified to add more info about how errenzhuan got started, but from my reading it seems like there should be more recognition here that the traditional forms were not sanitized: "Grotesque realism, dirty jokes, and coarse language are essential to errenzhuan," says http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138552/5/project_muse_719422.pdf, for example. Newsweek agrees: "...this form of comedy originated in northeast China, where ribald itinerant performers told dirty jokes, sang, and danced in farming communities to entertain peasants during the frigid and fallow winter months." https://www.newsweek.com/rise-comedians-china-embraces-raunch-74643
Unclevinny (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on the origin? 

message: Is this a form of shuochang?  Badagnani 23:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Shuochang]]
Talk:Multigene family

message: Favor: Merger makes sense, as multigene family -- as written -- appears to be a special case of gene family.  More importantly, this article may not be factually correct.  The distinction between "gene family" and "multigene family" should be verified.  If they do differ significantly, that distinction must be made in the article.  Until then, multigene family is a poorly described subset of gene family. NotTires (talk) 21:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Gene Family
Talk:Na–K–Cl cotransporter

message: I just changed the names on the gene boxes (Slc12a1 was labelled "...member 2" and vice versa) but the links aren't right now for some of them, and 2 is above 1 on the page, someone with the time should really change it round...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddo16 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Gon-no-suke (talk) 04:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Gene names

message: is this an active transport process?
:Depends what you mean by an active transport process.  No ATP is used in the exchange, but it depends on an ion gradient being there in the first place, which is energy dependent.  "semi active" might be a better term.
:Processes that use ATP directly are called primary active transport. Those that use it indirectly, usually referring to their use of the ATP-dependent sodium electrochemical gradient, are called secondary active transport. So NKCC transporters use secondary active transport. --David Iberri (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Active transport

message: Also, can someone clarify which direction each ion is moving?
134.36.64.142 (talk) 19:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most (if not all) NKCC proteins transport solutes into the cell. --David Iberri (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Direction
Talk:Presenilin

message: I am currently editing this page extensively, as there are various factual errors and ommisions. Does anyone have a source for the statement that drosophila has only one presenilin? Just because the locus for only one of the presenilin homologs in the fly has been found, this does not mean there is only one form. It only shows that one form has been found, and not the other. As there is sequence homology between the presenilins and two C. Elegans genes, the statement that invertebrates only have one version is incorrect. I will remove this section for now. Povmcdov 17:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rapid amplification of cDNA ends

message: I wrote an introduction and removed the context tag.  Not sure if I'm supposed to remove it myself or wait for another editor to remove it.  Maybe somebody can let me know.  
The article needs a figure to illustrate the strands and the amplifications.  I had to draw one myself when I read the article in order to understand it.
Drummstikk (talk) 01:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit on 3 April 2008

message: I fixed the description of 5' RACE. I think confusion stemmed from the fact that the cDNA strand synthesized (akin to first strand synthesis in RT-PCR) is antisense.
TdT adds a poly-T tail to the 3' end of the newly synthesized cDNA. One, because TdT acts on the 3' ends of DNA. Two, because adding a known priming site to the 5' end of the newly synthesized antisense strand would attach it to the end of the known sequence. (The 5' end of the antisense cDNA corresponds to the known, or at least not yet desired, 3' end of the mRNA.)
Kwedin 01:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  5' RACE edit of 23 Oct 2007 

message: There's already a "Race (biology)" article discussing races of animals. This article is currently titled "RACE (biology)". This doesn't seem very distinctive to me. Can I suggest either RACE (molecular biology) or RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends)?
Kwedin 01:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends, we can avoid parantheses alltogether--ZayZayEM 02:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Arm's length principle

message: Arm's length principle most central to transfer pricing and tax. Arms length transfer pricing with a distinction to be made between business and taxation transfer price. Acknowledge that under the Arms length principle companies will often develop two prices. One to   motivate managers and one to satisfy government? --Roberth23 22:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: There are three sources cited at the end of the article, probably all making very much the same points. Do Wikipedia principles actually insist that each statement in the article have one, two, or three of these sources attached as footnotes? GeorgeTSLC (talk) 20:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Problem
Talk:Hog-nosed skunk

message: It appears that recent workhttp://museum.utep.edu/chih/theland/animals/mammals/conemeso.htm has established that the western and eastern hog-nosed skunks are the same species, and that C.leuconotus (Eastern Hog-nosed Skunk) is the correct name.  Should we redirect pages, and if so, to where?  Dionyseus 23:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Only one species of Hog-nosed skunk? 

message: I wanted to make a wikiproject about ferrets and weasels but it became to small a range so i have made a bigger wikiprojects including all animals in the Musteloidea super family which include both ferrets and weasels and much similar animals. Support would be appreceated.
This new wikiproject includes all skunks
you can find it here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Weasels
i also made a little template for the project,
	This article is within the scope of the Weasel WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to Ferrets, Weasels, and other Weasel like friends. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
I hope you like it.
This wikiproject is for the superfamily of Musteloidea which currently and surprisingly does not have an article yet. This superfamily includes ferrets and weasels and all of our other furry little weasel like friends. Please put your name on it so this article could have it's very own wikiproject outside of wikiproject animals.
Teh Ferret 19:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Wikiproject 

message: I am a smoker and have recently discovered that I have a collection of at least four Hog Nosed Skunks that love to feed in my backyard.  My presence does not phase them.  As I walked to the edge of my deck just last night I stopped at the edge of the stairs that lead to my yard I looked down as I exhailed from a puff and not three feet from me on the second stair of three was one of the skunks.  I backed up slowly anyway. I know they are hognosed because they are digging up my yard all night long, in addition to the huge all white tails.  My deck was built over an existing  concrete set on stairs which over time the soil underneath has washed away leaving a perfect den.  I have not risked crawling under my deck to check.  Can I make any observations that may be helpful to anyone?  It seemed to me that not much is known specifically about the hognosed skunk.  I was also wandering if anyone has heard of people getting the skunks to interact with them, if only to walk up sniff and walk away.  I truly believe most animals can sense ill intentions of predators.  I just want to know if I would be warned before sprayed? anyone out there care about skunks?
72.179.143.188 (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  May I ask what were you smoking? Just to be sure you really saw skunks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.206 (talk) 01:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  western hog nosed skunk
Talk:Moninne

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Modwena. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 28#Modwena until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Modwena" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Victor and Corona

message: Despite the minor differences in dates and places, deriving from the different variants of the hagiography, the Victor of this article is obviously identical to Victor of Damascus. Corona, Stephana and Stephanis etc. are different names for the same Saint. What is better, have only one joint article for both saints, or seperate articles for Victor and for Corona/Stephana? --FordPrefect42 (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: see also Saint Stephanie, who seems to be our Saint Corona. --2607:FEA8:D5DF:F3D9:E096:4A02:3D97:1BC1 (talk) 13:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I merged the Saint Stephanie article into here. And I see that Victor of Damascus was long already already likewise redirected to here. I'd say this is finally resolved, after being partially resolved a decade ago(!). -sche (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Before a (probably) facetious mention (in a Reuter report?) there was no evidence whatsoever she had anything to do with epidemics! :) --Soundofmusicals (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it is quite possible that she will become associate with epidemics. For example:  -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before the association with the corona virus takes off!
Talk:Phycocyanin

message: Overall, I can understand main point of the article and what Phycocyanin does, but there are certain parts, such as in "Biosynthesis", where it was too wordy and does not seem like an average wiki user could understand. Also, some more links to other wikipedia articles will help readers understand. 
Introduction: 
* First paragraph: Please define what phycocyanin C and R are, as there does not seem to be anything on it in the introduction 
* Should remove or reword "depending on which specific type it is"
* Consistency with Phycocyanin C or C-Phycocyanin (are those the same protein?)
* Second paragraph: Add a link to the tetrapyrrole and chromophore wikipedia pages 
* Third Paragraph: Should be In vitro instead of invitro and is there any way that the last few sentences can flow better?
Body of the article: 
* The abbreviation C-PC should be defined sooner in the article. It is defined "Advances in Biotechnology", but the abbreviation shows up sooner in "Ecological Relevance" and "Biosynthesis". 
* Is there more information in the literature to complete the chart in "Spectral characteristics"?
* Mixotrophy could be linked to another wikipedia article and does not need to be explained too much
* Improperly cited articles in the "Food" subsection - references are not in the "References" section 
* Should be genetic engineering instead of gene engineering in "Ecological Relevance"
* Italicize bacteria species (ex: Anabaena, E. coli)
* The link for reference 6 is not working
The "Applications in Biotechnology" section was interesting and I would like to see that section expanded on more. 
Ryan.lou (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryan's EOSC 475 Peer Review
Talk:Permian High School Band

message: I'm unsure as to why the article was tagged as I am a new user/editor. @ the editors, please go in to detail here, if it's not too much trouble. It would seem strange to merge this article to me because the article about the main school is smaller than the article I have written. It also would seem strange because people would look at the article of the school after looking up High School Football or Friday Night Lights. People around the world are however interested in the Permian band as evidenced in the Chicago portion of the article. After the conference, many people and band directors called and e-mailed the band. This is what was posted on top. I couldn't understand it because it was a little unclear. I might just be stupid :D.
:Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.  You are welcome to delete the  (proposed deletion) tag if you think the article should be kept (I simply re-added on procedural grounds as proposed deletion tags do not apply to article talk pages.  Although the editor who tagged the article didn't specify a specific policy or guideline, I think he/she believes the article does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guideline.  If you think the article does satisfy the guideline or you intend to improve it to meet this guideline, you may remove the deletion tag (you can also remove the other tags if you feel the concerns they raise have been addressed or if you think they are not warranted).  For help on Wikipedia guidelines/policies and how to use Wikipedia, you can post questions at Wikipedia:Help desk.  Oh, and FYI, if a proposed deletion tag is removed from an article, it is usually (almost automatically) sent to the Articles for discussion page.  If you would like further information on deletion policies, please see Wikipedia:Deletion policy.  Cheers, Black Falcon 06:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Photosystem

message: There is a conflict in some of the sources:
:Photosystem II (so numbered because, while it was most likely the first to evolve, it was the second one discovered).
:Photosystem I evolved very early; photosystem II evolved later.
Any idea which oorrect? Looks like PSI evolved prior to PSII.
--Michael C. Price talk 20:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which evolved first?

message: Is there any reason that PSI doesn't have a dedicated page when PSII most of the other components of the LDR do? Jrowe2k (talk) 19:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Photosystem I" redirects here

message: Kelvinsong (talk) 20:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article seriously needs some pictures

message: Gobar Gas 2409:4051:2D99:EDC8:0:0:4A8B:8310 (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Photophosphorylation

message: Perhaps link to what "fret channels" are.Chamblis (talk) 22:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cyclic occurs at stroma or grana? It occurs in grana, not stroma.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.244.193.99 (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I checked a few recent papers and couldn't see any indication that it occurs specifically at the stroma lamellae, as opposed to any other part of the thylakoid membrane.  , thanks. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 00:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Cyclic photophosphorylation 43.246.227.114 (talk) 10:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Botony
Talk:Light-harvesting complexes of green plants

message: "The oxidised chlorophyll a replaces the electrons by photolysis that involves the reduction of water molecules to oxygen, protons and electrons." 
Shouldn't it be "oxidation of water molecules" or "breaking" or smth? O in water loses electrons, it's oxidative state increases, so water is oxidated not reduced. Oxidation involves loss of electrons. Confusing.. --Mustvalge (talk) 23:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's an "array of proteins"? A complex? --SCIdude (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  array?