lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Calliostoma tigris

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cassidae

message: This article was based on the corresponding article in Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 , which is not compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. This article has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Invertzoo (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Germany at the 1952 Summer Olympics

message: This article is a mess. I thought Germany was two countries after World War II - East Germany and West Germany - so why would they have a unified Olympic team? The article gives no clue.139.48.25.60 (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess 
Talk:Stampede Trail

message: All the stories are anecdotal in nature. I'm with the Healy/Denali Chamber of Commerce and many of the stories have passed by me. The article's current revision (as of 06 feb 2008) is an accurate accounting of events, in my opinion. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources is currently involved in tracing the ownership of the bus. I have yet to see a fully documented accounting of the history.Neal1047 (talk) 18:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's generally assumed that it has something to do with a public transit system preceding the Metropolitan Area Commuter System.  Public transportation in Fairbanks actually does have a very long history.  AFAIK, it was all privately owned and operated until MACS came along, which required separate affirmative votes by borough and city voters to make happen.  University Bus Lines, first under Paul Griemann and later Walt Conant, was in business for over four decades.  There were other companies which came and went during those years, from what I can tell.  If anyone has this much time, I'd bet that a search for "Fairbanks City Transit System" in old phone books and Polk directories would be a good place to start. RadioKAOS  –  Talk to me, Billy  14:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: any chance of adding coordinates?  e.g. http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&q=&jsv=143c&sll=52.632356,4.750678&sspn=0.100852,0.2211&ie=UTF8&geocode=FZarzgMdFNEb9w&split=0  — Xiutwel ♥ (msg) 21:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Charonia lampas capax

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Clionidae

message: Propose merge with Sea angel. Much duplicate information on what, as far as i can tell, is the same group of fauna. If i am taxonomically confused, remove tag Jebus989 (talk) 13:30, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 
Talk:National Party (United States)

message: The source of this article is the page http://www.marxisthistory.org/subject/usa/eam/cppa.html
of the Early American Marxist History website. This page contains links to PDF documents created by or about the Farmer-Labor Party during its existence. 
:# The original text was not copyrighted.
:# The author was consulted as a courtesy.  The author then granted explicit permission to use the text. 
DJ Silverfish 19:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something

message: CAL is supposed to have created a National Party around 1918, and Zahnd claimed connection to it. Шизомби (talk) 17:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPs of [[Charles August Lindbergh]] and [[John Zahnd]] 

message: Are the Single-Taxers alluded to here actually Social Credit-types, per the link, or Single-Tax supporters in the Fairhope, Alabama sense?  75.216.116.2 (talk) 03:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Single-Taxers'
Talk:Germany at the 1912 Summer Olympics

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Walter Engelmann and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Walter Engelmann until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  BilledMammal (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Walter Engelmann" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Johannes Buder and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Johannes Buder until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  BilledMammal (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Johannes Buder" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Common periwinkle

message: In Marvel Comics' Thor #601 dated June 2009 (by J. Michael Straczynski), Doctor Doom prepares a feast for visiting Asgardians Balder the Brave and Loki (in his female form) consisting of mutton, lamb, goat, pork, eels, salmon and "winkles".
Von Doon then mentions how it was difficult to find good winkles this time of year in Latveria especially since he did not know what they were until looking it up on Wikipedia.
I thought it was pretty cool and deserving of a mention.
DOOOOOM!!!! --Jack Meihoffer (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in modern culture ??? 

message: I don't know how to properly deal with a broken source, so I'm posting this here. But I was trying source the UGS NAS Littorina littorea entry by clicking on the hyperlink (for a paper), and the hyperlink redirected back to the homepage for the UGS NAS. When I tried to make a query from the homepage I could find no entries for "Littorina littorea".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18scsc (talk • contribs) 05:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with source 3 or UGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database
Talk:Conoidea

message: Taxonomic is implicit in the term superfamily in the context of any biological or paleontological article are there for is superfluous.
Sophsticated isn't what's meant. Sophisticated is a character qualily. A better term would be advanced or evolved.
Since they are sea snails they are marine gastropods, which goes without saying. And since they are gastropods. Besides that is well shown in the taxobox.
Revisions have been made
John McDonnell  —Preceding undated comment added 20:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your interest in this article. I did think that some of your edits were quite helpful. Other deletions I have restored. WikiProject Gastropods has a routine way of setting up an article, and there are supporting reasons for the inclusion of all of the terms. The introduction of a Wikipedia article needs to start off by being fully comprehensible to a non-specialist in the field, as well as being satisfying to an expert. Wikipedia is not a science encyclopedia or a biology text. The average person does not know what a gastropod is, and does not know that it is the same thing as a snail. It is worth repeating the meaning in order to get the point across first in everyday terms and then in scientific terms. Wikipedia is not just a reference book for semi-experts to consult, it is also a means to educate complete amateurs. Best wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Scouting and Guiding in Montserrat

message: It is proposed that the two separate articles on Scouting and Guiding be merged into this article. The size of both organizations is small and it is difficult to demonstrate notability. It is unlikely that the single article will grow in the near future to be large enough that demands a fork. See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Girl Guiding and Girl Scouting task force#United Kingdom outlying Guiding.
*Support merge for reasons given above. --Bduke  (Discussion) 11:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of separate Scout and Guide articles to here

message: The non-free use of the image in this article is currently being discussed at WP:NFCR#File:Scout Association of the West Indies.png. All interested editors are welcome to participate and comment on whether use of the image complies with WP:NFCCP. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus at the above referenced NFCR discussion is that the use of the image in this article does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not being used as the primary means of identification of the subject of this article in the infobox as is being claimed in its non-free use rationale. The image is also not the subject of any sourced critical commentary with in the article itself, and the caption provided for the image may be true, but no source is cited in support so it cannot be verified so it is essentially original research. Moreover, how the image significantly improves the reader's understanding of this particular article is not clear at all. The image seems to be being used purely for decorative purposes which something that is not allowed per NFCC#8. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free use of [[:File:Scout Association of the West Indies.png]]
Talk:Silver Age of Latin literature

message: While the term Silver Age persists mostly in older publications, the accepted term in the field is now Post-Augustan.  I propose that the page be renamed to reflect this fact with a consolidation of the text that already alludes to the reasons for the abandonment of the older terminology.  If there are no serious objections, I will do this after March 7, 2007. --Nefasdicere 19:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to change the name then you have to request a move. --Folantin 21:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Intelligence cycle

message: This item seems somewhat idiosyncratic in its definition, and probably does not come from an authoritative source.  'Intelligence cycle' is defined in the NATO Glossary (AAP-6), together with definitions for each of the five activities in the all important 'processing' step of the cycle. 
Nfe 02:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The article starts: "The Intelligence cycle is a cyclical set of procedures for the production of intelligence information".
The second last paragraph says: "Referring to 'intelligence information' is fundamentally wrong. Intelligence is processed information."
It really needs to be harmonised!
User: Bathrobe Not logged in (10 April 2007)
The 'Intelligence Cycle Management' entry is an interesting essay although patchy in its coverage (not least because most nations reveal very little) and probably misnamed 'Intelligence Management' might be more appropriate.  The entry here is narrow in focus and merely attempts to provide a reasonably succinct explanation about what the Intelligence Cycle is, albeit from a NATO perspective. 
Nfe 02:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intelligence information

message: This article is far too NATO-centric. In fact, NATO has no internal intelligence collection ability of its own. That alone almost makes this article moot. This should focus on the cycle concept as it pertains to the many intel agencies in the world. Separate articles could then be created for the specific nations as needed (i.e. the US Intelligence Cycle).
Furthermore, this article should not be merged with the ICM article. 1) The ICM article is not well written. 2) The ICM article does nothing to achieve the goal it is to accomplish, namely defining what ICM is. 3) The Intelligence Cycle is much more than what this article poorly describes. T geier (talk) 12:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATO-centric and No Merging!
Talk:Toby Goodshank

message: I rewrote this article, replacing the previous excessively promotional text, which had been copied verbatim from the Olive Juice Music website. I have tried to source properly, but as I am personally acquainted with the article's subject and some of its other referents, that is the (admittedly insufficient) source for some of the information. Please improve upon this where possible.
Things to look out for:
* I'm not yet familiar with the wiki format(s) for proper referencing/notes, so refs don't appear at the end of the article
* The image I uploaded may be temporary -- I will try to get permission to include an appropriate and illustrative image in the next few days
While there are certainly problems with this article, this is undoubtedly a huge improvement on the veritable advertisement that was here before. Please re-tag and improve accordingly. --Ninly 19:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conus lienardi

message: JoJan / Invertzoo / Ganeshk, this article needs to be renamed to Conus lienardi to match WoRMS.  I already fixed the redirect by killing it but cannot delete the article to allow this to be moved to the correct name article without a copy replace.  This should be able to be simply MOVED. Shellnut (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. JoJan (talk) 13:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Conus litoglyphus

message: I know nothing about this subject, so I don't feel I can add content constructively, but the "Account" tab of this seems like it would be a very useful source if anyone wants to add it.  I'll put it into the External Links section for now.  Wrelwser43 (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good source 

message: I have a specimen of this species in my collection and will upload an image soon.Shellnut (talk) 04:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Future Work

message: Some databases (eg Commons) use the name Conus lithoglyphus. If not spelling variant, but just typo, then these files in Commons must be renamed--Estopedist1 (talk) 21:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conus lithoglyphus?
Talk:Laura Chang

message: The World Conference of Science Journalists site has a page (http://www.wcsjnews.org/users/laura-chang) that confirms some, but not all, of the details on the article page as of 27 Mar 2010.  (It also has a few other details.) It appears to have been created by Ms. Chang herself.  I did not want to just add it as a footnote to the page due to the lack of complete overlap, but I thought I'd make this note of it.  -- bjkeefe (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for biographical details 

message: The booming blog ended two years ago. Binarybits (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booming blog
Talk:Cookia sulcata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Freundeskreis der Wirtschaft

message: www.reformation.org appears to be a religious nutjob site which caters to the conspiracy crowd, and would seem to be a dubious source of information about the current topic (or anything else). Recommend it be stricken from the list references/biblio with all due haste.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.19.159 (talk) 08:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Reference
Talk:Highways and routes in the Dominican Republic

message: A Highway is a Motor-way that has no intersection, it's continuous...!
A route is a fast road, but has intersections with lights! The typical route in the DR is the San Francisco de Macoris to the DR-1. It's also one of the most dangerous roads in the DR since oncoming traffic often collides head-on, leaving many passengers dead...!!!
Autopista, Highway, Autobahn and Autostrada, as well as freeway are all highways in the classic sense, toll based or not, they have no intersections and slow traffic like moped, bicycles, agricultural vehicles and pedestrians are not allowed on those! typically speed has to be at least 60 km/h or 40 mph, updated laws require vehicles to be able to maintain 80km/h or 50mph to be allowed onto them...!
in California motorcycles below 250cc are not allowed on freeways, no matter how fast they can go..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.219.123.178 (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  no correct
Talk:Scouting in Serbia

message: These images should not be used in this article:
* :Image:Savez Izviđača Srbije membership badge.png: used in main article; user here is redundant
* :Image:SerbiaVojvodinaHungarian.png ; should be used only in main article if appropriate
:For this image, Scouting in Serbia is the main article, there is no other use of the image and no other place for it. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For this image, Scouting in Serbia is the main article, there is no other use of the image and no other place for it. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free image use
Talk:Doridoidea

message: :The word "Doridoidea" comes from the generic name Doris, which was in turn copied from the name of the sea nymph Doris in Greek mythology.
Really? Is this also where the name dorid (as in dorid vs eolid kinds of nudibranch) comes from? And if so, where is aeolid from? Also, anybody got a source or an idea of when these names date to? Was there some explanation in 1815? Cesiumfrog (talk) 03:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  dorid etymology
Talk:Eddie Hope

message: I have placed merger tags on a number of character articles. Rather than repeat the reasoning on each talk page I have set out the full argument here. Please feel free to leave comments either on this talk page or at the WikiProject. I want to try and start a debate about the whole way in which Emmerdale information is provided on Wikipedia. --Amxitsa 19:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:Rheinische Post

message: Rheinische Post Verlagsgesellschaft mbH: this page doesn't exist in  de:wiki. I guess nobody is going to write it for this wiki. --129.69.141.80 (talk) 16:04, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  no redlink needed 