Talk:Clean technology

message: I do see a good argument being discussed to merge Cleantech and Clean Technology.  There appears to be a different converstation betweent the two.  One is about the actual technology (Clean Technology) and the other is about the financial aspects of the space, that is well known as the cleantech space.  I don't see any attempt at discussion, only an attempt to merge the two and as I've been monitoring this, it appears that either members of or friends of the Clean Edge group are trying to eliminate some of the dialogue here.  That's not the spirit of Wikipedia.  Please start the discussion and stop trying to unamimously trash the Cleantech page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.169.145 (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For the uninformed these two are used interchangably however Renewable energy at the moment includes burning firewood as fuel (13% of world energy use). So big question is whether renewable energy is really Clean technology, and if not why is it referenced here?? Jagra (talk) 04:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green vs Renewable

message: Don't merge the two. Cleantech is a sector which has a clear identity, as seen by existence of bodies such as the CleanTech Group. See also the related Wikipedia entry under 'Cleantech Revolution'. As a cleantech professional, I always use the term 'cleantech', not 'clean technology'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.82.107.44 (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merge. Can't see why we should have two separate articles on this. Splette :) How's my driving? 16:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleantech vs Clean Technology

message: If hydrogen is used as a fuel source, it's clean.  Due to the fact that burned exhaust gases are actually just water vaper.
Some may argue that the production of hydrogen itself is not clean, my response is simply use electrolysis to extract hydrogen gas from water.  The following argument is that the production of the electricity for the electrolysis process is in fact not clean, due to the majority of electrical power produced at this time comes from coal.  However in reality the electrical power used can come from clean energy sources such as wind/solar/hydro, etc.  Done. presto, clean portable low weight fuel.
Some may further argue, "WHAT ABOUT THE HINDENBURG!" well there is two things that come to mind.  One, hydrogen can be pretty powerful, and thus useful as a fuel.  Two, no car, truck or van I can think of would actually carry around a fuel tank the size of the Hindenburg. --172.251.204.186 (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use Hydrogen as a form of a portable clean technology fuel? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Clean technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525071904/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081 to https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=apeyv.EIQQv4&refer=australia
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090316181631/http://climatecongress.ku.dk/newsroom/congress_key_messages/ to http://climatecongress.ku.dk/newsroom/congress_key_messages/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Juniper37 (talk) 18:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Geographies of Energy and Sustainability