Talk:Accidental release source terms

message: User 12.4.195.228 removed the R from the equation for the U.S.EPA Method for the evaporation from a non-boiling liquid pool because presumably he looked at Equation B-7 in reference (3), from which the equation was obtained.
Equation B-7 (which indeed does not have the gas law constant R) was derived from Equation D-1 in that same reference (3).  Equation D-1 does have the R, and both equations are equivalent to each other. Equation B-7 was obtained by dividing the R=82.05 into the constant in Equation D-1 to obtain the different constant used in Equation B-7 (which excludes the R).  I repeat, the two equations in reference (3) are completely equivalent.
For this article, I chose to use Equation D-1 because it showed the fact that R (the gas law constant) was indeed involved.  I then converted Equation D-1 so that all of the units are metric (since the D-1 used a mixture of metric and non-metric units) to arrive at the equation presented in this article.
I know the above sounds complicated ... and it requires a close reading of reference (3), but the equation as I presented it in this article was correct and the R must be retained in the equation. - mbeychok 18:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of reverting of EPA equation to what it was previously  

message: Regarding your changing of the equation:
* 0.0035 is simply 0.284 divided by R = 82.05
* There are a great many people outside of the USA who don't know what a ft2 is  ... nor do they know what a lb is. Therefore, it is necessary to use metric units for them.
* My equation as I wrote it (using all metric units) gives exactly the same answer as the EPA's mixed up units does. Try using:
**u = 2 m/s (in EPA equation and mine)
**M = 90 (in EPA equation and mine)
**A = 100 ft2 (in EPA equation) = 9.294 m2 (in mine)... since 100 ft2 = 9.294 m2
**P = 400 mmHg (in EPA equation) = 53.33 kPa (in mine) ... since 400 mmHg = 53.33 kPa
**T = 300 K (in EPA equation and mine)
**R = 82.05 (in Epa equation and mine)
The EPA equation will give you 15.94 lbs/min and my equation will give you 7.23 kg/min ... which are equivalent to each other.
As I said before, if you'll give me your fax number, I will fax you a copy of the above two calculations and you can see that they give the same answer.
My email address is mbeychok@cox.net and my phone number is 949-718-1360. I will wait to hear from you on the Discussion page of the Accidental release source terms article.  Wikipedia only works well when we collaborate rather than simply reverting each other. If  you don't respond within 24 hours, I will be forced to revert your change again. PLEASE contact me or try the above test. - mbeychok 16:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More discussion of EPA equation changed by [[User:MadScientist80|MadScientist80]]

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Accidental release source terms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809204358/http://www.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=20725 to http://vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=20725
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060501124417/http://www.okcc.com/PDF/Choked%20Flow%20of%20Gases%20pg.48.pdf to http://www.okcc.com/PDF/Choked%20Flow%20of%20Gases%20pg.48.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have been referencing a page of Milton Beychok's original webpage and discovered that this appears to have been the basis for this Wikipedia page.
However, a section of Milton's page covering liquid releases does not appear to have been transferred and this omission does not have been recognised before. 
I have not been able to find an explanation for this, which has been replicated in other documents based on this Wikipedia page. 
The missing sections are as follows:
Liquid Discharge From A Pressurized Source Vessel: refs 1, 2
Initial instantaneous flow through the discharge opening:
(1)   Qi = C A [ ( 2 g d 2 H ) + ( 2 d ) ( P - PA ) ] 1/2
Final flow when the liquid level reaches the bottom of the discharge opening:
(2)   Qf = C A [ ( 2 d ) ( P - PA ) ] 1/2
Average flow:
(3)   Qavg = ( Qi + Qf ) ÷ 2
where: 
Q =  mass flow rate, kg / s
C =  discharge coefficient     (dimensionless, usually about 0.62)
A =  discharge hole area, m 2
g =  local gravitational acceleration of  9.807 m / s 2
d =  source liquid density, kg / m 3
P =  absolute source pressure, Pa  
PA =  absolute ambient pressure, Pa   
H =  height of liquid above bottom of discharge opening, m
When expressed in the customary USA units, the equations (1) and (2) above also contain the gravitational conversion factor gc ( 32.17 ft / s2 in USA units ) associated with the ( P - PA ) term.  Since gc is 1 ( kg-m ) / ( N-s2 ) in the SI metric system of units, equations (1) and (2) above do not include it.
Liquid Discharge From A Non-Pressurized Source Vessel: refs 1, 2
Initial instantaneous flow through the discharge opening:
(1)   Qi = C A ( 2 g d 2 H )1/2
Final flow when the liquid level reaches the bottom of the discharge opening:
(2)   Qf = 0
Average flow:
(3)   Qavg = Qi ÷ 2
where:
Q =  mass flow rate, kg / s
C =  discharge coefficient     (dimensionless, usually about 0.62)
A =  discharge hole area, m 2
g =  local gravitational acceleration of  9.807 m / s 2
d =  source liquid density, kg / m 3
H =  height of liquid above bottom of discharge opening, m
Jcaiken (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Accidental release source terms?