lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Palutena

message: パルテナ should be written as "Parthena" in English. It comes from the Greek "Παρθενα" meaning virgin, and is written in English as Parthena.72.200.173.230 15:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this information is fair and reasonable and should be put back in.  It doesn't seem like speculation at all, it's logically extracted from an understanding of the Greek and Japanese language systems and how they compare in translation.  The trivia about the role of Palutena compared to real Greek deities is not speculation either, it's merely comparative mythology.  It never said she was for sure based on those two gods, although we know the game generally is based on Greek myth - the trivia merely compared her to the myth system she was derived from.  There's a difference between unfounded speculation (like comparing her shield to Link's just because there's a mirror on it) and very obvious comparisons (like drawing parallels between languages and mythological systems), and the trivia tidbits were the latter.  Therefore I'm putting them back in.Rglong 18:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese name

message: Someone had put all the Palutena text on the page "Paletuna" and had the original page redirect to that one. I took the liberty of putting it back where it belongs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.91.8.99 (talk) 17:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[Paletuna]]"
Talk:The Cat Who Came to Breakfast

message: If the term Fudgies is not used in the book, why is it used in the article? Seems very odd. Lots42 10:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fudgies
Talk:Ghelardh (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Singheshwar (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Gamhariya (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Shankarpur (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Us

message: Does anybody else think the redirect page US, should go here? -Aled D 14:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[US]]

message: What about the word "us"? This absolutely needs to be added. A• •F•O•X ¡u6is April Fool's Day 2OO7 01:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already there - the wiktionary box is on the right. — Swpb talk contribs 17:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What about us?

message: which generally refers to the 'United States of America'., what else does it occasionally refer to?      --78.86.146.148 (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: generally refers to the United States of America  BUT also .... 

message: I've altered this in passing, and removed the (unsourced) PC remark that it might be considered offensive by some  U.S. military personnel. I've never known any U/S personnel even to notice the joke.
The Wiktionary entry says "(UK, WWII, until 1944)", but I feel sure that is inaccurate; that it was both coined earlier,and in currency later. I certainly remember seeing equipment labelled "U/S" on a Royal Naval Air Station in the late '60s (I don't recall if it was an American machine ;).
A Google Books search for "unserviceable slang +u/s" reveals a page from British English A to Zed (Norman W. Schur, Eugene H. Ehrlich, Richard Ehrlich.)(Love that "Zed") that claims the term - as U.S., also U/S - originated in British civil service government laboratories. It also says "now rare", but that probably depends on the generation one talks with.
It is a moot point whether those computer programmes which accept only American language & locale conventions, are in fact U/S. 
Memethuzla (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defective, U/S 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :US (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#US (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 15:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "US (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sky & Telescope

message: I have reverted the anonymous comment about content trending downward since the 1960s.  It may be worth adding a non-judgemental section covering content changes given the rise of the commercial amateur astronomy marketplace and the Internet. Daveharr 14:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content changes since 1960s 
Talk:Murliganj (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Gwalpara

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Bihariganj (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Rita's Water Ice

message: im vincent tumolo. i belive bob tumolo is a distant relative  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.73.31 (talk) 03:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bob tumolo 

message: Some Rita's are open year-round, while others are open seasonally. I'm going to add this to the article, citing the official Rita's website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.166.26.192 (talk) 18:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year-Round vs. Seasonal 

message: I've started to work through some of the promotional language and trivia in this article. Much of the content was written in a heavily promotional tone. Flavor listings and such are trivial, based on the basic concept of never being listed in an independent reliable source.
At the moment, this article is sorely lacking in independent reliable sources. Based on the current sources, I think notability is marginal at best. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Per the company's press releases... - SummerPhD (talk) 05:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rita's Water Ice]] not "Rita's Italian Ice"
Talk:Tatiana Romanova

message: If I remember correctly, they had a different actress do her voice.  That's worthy of mention in the article. David Bergan 14:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed... if there's a good, official source out there for it. I've heard it, too. RobertM525 02:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice actress

message: Anyone else think that the info on Tatiana from the novel should be separate from the movie version?  I'm not recommending two separate articles - just create separate sections for the novel version and the film version of the character.  While reading the article, I felt like it was randomly pinballing between the two.  (70.146.15.17 03:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate sections?
Talk:Udakishunganj (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Puraini (community development block)

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Alamnagar

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Chousa

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request
Talk:Tamara Bunke

message: The new pictures improve the article considerably. But what about possible copyright problems? The German Federal Archives, for instance, have two own photos, which you can't see (only a blacked place instead with the explanation of either uncleared copyrights or other problems. After futher searching there, I've read Prensa Latina claimed to have all rights at her picture and that publications would need their approval.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.43.96.123 (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the last year's state, when I was searching for a convenient picture. Meanwhile there is only one page for Tamara Bunke without a blacked place but still a similar explanation. [See here.] 78.43.96.123 (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Copyright problems 

message: The Article:
"Tania was waist-deep in the water, with her rifle held above her head, when she was shot through the arm and the lung and killed along with eight of her fellow insurgents in quick succession.[1][3] Her body was then carried downstream and only recovered by the Bolivian army several days later on September 6."
The Citation:
"Tania was waist-deep in the water, with her M-1 carbine held above her head, when she was shot through the arm and the lung and killed along with eight of her fellow insurgents in quick succession. Her body was then carried downstream and only recovered by the Bolivian army several days later on September 6."
https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=136181031
The liscense of the citation:
"Find A Grave and its licensors retain title, ownership and all other rights and interests in and to all Content, except as expressly set forth in these Terms. This limited license is non-exclusive, not transferable, revocable at all times, royalty-free, global, and limited to the term, purpose and content of these Terms. The Websites are protected by copyright as a collective work and/or compilation, pursuant to U.S. copyright laws, international conventions, and other copyright laws."
She is dead jim, and so is the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BC82:B600:287F:13AC:CC4F:EAA2 (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definite copyright problems, not just paraphrasing.
Talk:Konka (river, Zaporizhzhia Oblast)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 18:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Konka (river) →  – Not the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - it's ambiguous with Konka (river, Kherson Oblast). HappyWith (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I think this qualifies as an uncontroversial move. Support in any case. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 November 2023
Talk:Terryville High School

message: could any of the contributors to this article who are familiar with this high school please write an encyclopedic lead for this article? -- frymaster 14:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: wikification needed badly

message: The drama club article seems NPOV but that could just cause im Connor McKenna Silly me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.37.139.14 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Template talk:Template link universal

message: Template:Tlu has been listed at Templates for discussion (nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:

to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. JsfasdF252 (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Primefac (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request to complete TfD nomination 

message: Change  to , since many people requested that the <See Tfm> link be removed. JsfasdF252 (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done though this isn't  which is used by 500 times more. Nardog (talk) 22:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 18 March 2021 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 21:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Tlu →  – From shortcut name to descriptive name JsfasdF252 (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 April 2021
Category talk:Terrorism in the United Kingdom

message: Surely Omagh bombing ought to be included in this category, plus other IRA bombings? 
Looking at the edit page does not give any clues as to how to include it. 
Articles about the IRA etc barely mention the amount of mutilation and killings the bombs caused.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.44.102 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see HELP:CAT. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 03:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: How to add
Talk:Bloc pot

message: I removed the section on the party being a popular protest vote. With less than 1% of the vote it can hardly be considered popular. Ifnord 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular? 
Talk:The Quest for Kalevala

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Category talk:Liverpudlians

message: I notice that the character actor Norman Rossington (B: 24 December 1928, D: 21 May 1999) who appeared in dozens of films (including "A Hard Day's Night" and "Lawrence of Arabia") and countless TV programmes is not included in this list and does not have a biographical entry.  Barfbagger 14:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Equinox (comics)

message: Nothing in the origin presented tells us if Equinox is a mutate, mutant, or what. Until someone has some data, I'm deleting the category "Mutate". Rosencomet (talk) 20:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mutate?
Talk:Heliopolitans

message: Apparently they're a fictional group of gods. As opposed to all the real ones out there.--Sid rumpo (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is inspired by the Ennead, but in Egyptian mythology, the Ennead is just one of the Egyptian pantheons, in Marvel Fandom, there is already a main article for Gods of Egypt.Hyju (talk) 10:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional
Talk:Circus of Crime

message: Is this too much in universe? RJFJR (talk) 18:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  13:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Death-Throws

message: I propose that Knickknack (comics), Ringleader (comics), and Tenpin (comics) be merged into this article at Members. The three are minor characters that have been primarily, if not only, used in stories featuring the entire team. The content of the three can easily bee subsumed here without creating an article needing to be split on size issues. It is also possible to fold Bombshell (Marvel Comics) and Oddball (comics), though there are potential issues with those articles due to "Alternate version" sections and covering more than one character.
- J Greb (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the three minor members of the group should be merged into the Death-Throws article. There is very little or no difference between their personal fictional history and that of the team's fictional history. As for Bombshell and Oddball, their appearances have been a little more extensive but easily added to the team article. And I would say that their alternate versions are arguably unimportant or a simple case of characters with unintentional similar names.- Caged halo (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added solo appearances to the main Death-Throws article. It fits in well and proves that the characters don't require individual pages. A "Powers and abilities" section could be added. However, the "Members" section is filling that role nicely.Caged halo (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree too.--Crazy runner (talk) 17:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Earth Force (Marvel Comics)

message: I propose that Earth Lord, Skyhawk (comics), Wind Warrior be merged into Earth Force (Marvel Comics). They are minor characters which appeared only with the team except for Skyhawk (comics) (a Skrull infiltrator made two little apparitions in Initiative). I think that the content in the character's articles can easily be explained in the context of the team (even the little infiltrator Skrull), and the team's article is of a reasonable size in which the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Alone, none of the characters have enought notability and coverage for an article.--Crazy runner (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal