Talk:Hurricane Lili (1996)

message: This article is skin and bones with no hope of a healthy future. Let's merge it with 1996 Atlantic hurricane season. Thoughts? Concerns? Rantings and ravings? -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde - archive 04:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite this author's usual tendencies, I think this page has a lot of information. I find the political information especially good for an article. It needs some copywriting, but I think this storm is important enough that it could remain an article. Of course, if the information was false, and the storm was not as bad as remembered, I might change my mind, but I am content with keeping the article. However, there are plenty others I want to see go... Hurricanehink 20:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree.  Writing is terrible, content is passable. Jdorje 05:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The information is correct and I dont know why that the storm didnt make the headlines in the U.S. back then (especally the political fallout after the storm), so I'm favoring of keeping the article. Storm05 17:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please improve the article then with correct grammar, spelling, wikification, and structure. Jdorje 18:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re. Lili

message: Some of the text in the article was stolen.  I deleted it. Jdorje 18:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stolen 

message: Main thing is the entire article has to be checked to make sure the original author didn't just copy-and-paste it.  The aftermath section is spaghetti and needs a full copyedit.  Other sections are confused: for instance the impact section on Great Britain gives part of the storm history for some reason.  The external links is way too long (linking to individual pictures? no way.). Jdorje 20:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've forgot to cite some of the information when I wrote the article Storm05 18:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs more citations, and perhaps more content, before it can attain B class.  Thegreatdr 19:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I think this article has a very short MH for a hurricane that lasted over two weeks. --12george1 (talk) 03:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Hurricane Lili (1996). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130714051924/http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996lili.html to http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/1996lili.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919210712/http://www2.fiu.edu/~fcf/lili.strikes.html to http://www2.fiu.edu/~fcf/lili.strikes.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312215337/http://www.hidro.cu/hidrologia1.htm to http://www.hidro.cu/hidrologia1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919210704/http://www2.fiu.edu/~fcf/new.challenge.html to http://www2.fiu.edu/~fcf/new.challenge.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6CV1scaM6?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aoml.noaa.gov%2Fhrd%2FLandsea%2FNHR-Cuba.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/NHR-Cuba.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919210722/http://www2.fiu.edu/~fcf/lili.cuba.html to http://www2.fiu.edu/~fcf/lili.cuba.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://idol.union.edu/garverj/Geo35/hurricane/Damage.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified