Talk:Draconian (Dragonlance)

message: It'd be nice if the link to a Geocities site was changed for a more accurate and professional site, if one exists. I'll try and find one, and if I do, I'll add it. I'll still leave the Geocities site though, since it's relevant enough. Dali 03:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe we can upload the book covers from Kang's Regiment series, and use them to show the draconians. The covers could be also later used for list of books. -- ReyBrujo 02:32, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I googled a site and a rather nice one came up. No official rule description for the D&d game, but I think it'll make a nice addition. If there's something wrong with it, simply delete it. Dali 03:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: Does anyone know what sort of draconian is on the cover of Draconian Measures?  If it's Kang himself, then it's a Bozak, but looking at several images from Dragonlance Campaign Setting, it looks like it is indeed a Bozak of some sort.  The horns tip me up on that.  I'll list it as such.  DoomsDay349 01:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kang himself. Ddcc 05:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured as much.  And Kang is indeed a Bozak. DoomsDay349 05:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Is a draconian a dragon, and if so, should it be added to the respective dragon categories? Ddcc 02:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...I do not have the Bestiary of Krynn as of yet, but I do not believe they are dragons.  They are a subrace of dragons, but I don't think they're considered as being a dragon monster...wait a tic...lemme check my Dragonlance Campaign Setting, there's info in there...well, they are listed as medium dragons, so yeah, I guess.  Go for it. DoomsDay349 02:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted. Ddcc 05:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon 

message: It's been a while since I read the Chronicles, but I don't remember there being Noble draconians. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.163.61.3 (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are in the Bestiary of Krynn, revised or otherwise, and have recently appeared in the Dragons of Time anthology.  Not overly important, but canonical. DoomsDay349 20:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright then. 63.163.61.3 15:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I added references to the Noble draconian entries. Showers 18:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noble Draconians -- canon? 

message: I have added the two Proto-Draconian species to the Draconian article. For those who are unaware, the proto-draconians were introduced in the various 2nd edition Taladas game modules. I have the Time of the Dragons set with directly sources the traag but I am unable to find info on the Sesk although I distinctly remember them. If anyone could help me fill out the information for them, it would be great. Showers 06:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proto-Draconians 

message: This article has been tagged as containing weasel words ("some say.." "critics state.." and so on) since 2008. I've read through the article and couldn't find any. --Sus scrofa (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That tag was probably added years ago by now-banned User:Gavin.collins, who obsessively tagged any articles related to D&D with as many cleanup tags as he could possibly think of.  Other users would debate some of his tags with him, charging that he did not know what he was talking about, but to no avail as he simply did not listen to other people.  Feel free to remove them at your discretion. 108.69.80.49 (talk) 23:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words?