Talk:Super Castlevania IV

message: see your talk page --Zaharous (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated the Storyline section and added some Notes 

message: Please stop. Blanking pages and reverting useful changes is considored vandalism. I politely ask you to stop sabotaging this article.172.215.133.91 04:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to whoever is blanking the page, or reverting changes 

message: I added information about the US localization, and refrences to Konama USA's version of the timeline for comparison with Japanese version of the story. Someone still needs to transcribe Konami USA's timeline printed in Nintendo Power to its own wiki subject for comparision with the Japanese version of the timeline, and so that that one link back to the timeline as well. Anyone up for the task? I'll do it once I find my copy of the Nintendo Power it was printed in. Note I'm neutral on the issue and won't bring up which timeline is more valid, I just believe that for comparison sake, that one should bring up the facts about differences between the games released in Japan, and the differences in Localization, and Konami USA's decisionsDraculvania 15:11, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: US storyline

message: At this time, this "encyclopedic" article pretends this game was never even released for the PAL territories.  Someone with the appropriete knowledge should please fix this glaring oversight.  81.240.52.206 08:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article doesn't even make mention of the European/PAL release 

message: This is game is going to be Wii's virtual console release so I added some info about it. Feel free to add more — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.103.201.151 (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virtual console release 

message: I believe I've finally found the NA release date for this game, although you will have to bear with me on my reasoning.
I myself don't remember exactly when the game came out, although I agree that it came out in December 1991 as I've seen the Nintendo Power issue that talks about the game and I think I have it around here somewhere.
Regardless, most major games seem to come out on a Tuesday, so I looked at the 1991 calendar and saw that the 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th, and 31st were Tuesdays.  However, most articles that discuss the game mention that it came out "in time for Christmas" (which of course makes sense).  This would leave the 3rd, 10th, 17th, and 24th, although I doubt it came out on the 24th since that would be very last minute.
Now, Top Ten Reviews says that the game was released on "December 0, 1991," which is obviously a typo, although I think this is a typo for December 10, 1991.  December 10 is a Tuesday and it is before Christmas, so I believe this date fits perfectly.  Of course, if you disagree feel free to comment. --Brahman 23:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We still need a verifiable source indicating that the 10th is the correct date. Additionally, we cannot reproduce contents of instruction booklets and whatnot to our heart's content, so I've reverted your changes for the time being. Combination 00:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American Release Date 

message: The article says the Western version of SC4 does not consider itself a remake, which is wrong. In the American version of the game, both the in-game prologue and manual specifically state that has been 100 years since Dracula was last defeated. Since the game's protagonist is Simon Belmont, the game CANNOT be considered a continuation of Simon's story that takes place after Castlevania II. The only proper ways it could fit itself into Simon's continuity is as a remake of the first game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.22.245 (talk) 21:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Plot Is Incorrect 

message: I'm going to try smooth out the version differences section and add some links where needed, tell me if I screw something up. --Craeldon (talk) 10:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modifying 

message: James Rolfe (a.k.a. The Angry Video Game Nerd) reviewed this game in his 4-part Castlevania marathon back in 2009. At the end of the marathon, he declared Super Castlevania IV his favorite Castlevania of all time, and even compared it to Symphony of the Night in gameplay and challenge.
I added this to the page, I need someone to make the citation for me because I don't know how.
It's on ScrewAttack: http://screwattack.com/videos/AVGN-Castlevania-Part-4-1 66.227.220.139 (talk) 22:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Angry Video Game Nerd 

message: I love how people always bring up the part in the manual where it says that "it is once again time for Simon Belmont to call forth the power of good", while conveniently ignoring one of the previous paragraphs where it says that "100 years have passed since the last battle between Dracula and Belmonts". Castlevania IV was never said to be a continuation of Castlevania II, even in the overseas versions. It's only the internet fans who read too much into things. Jonny2x4 (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castlevania IV was never considered a sequel to Castlevania II