lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Marie-Thérèse Walter

message: Cuando se conocieron == ==
Este artículo establece que se conocieron en 1925, cuando Marie-Thérèse fue de 15. El principal Picasso El artículo dice que se conocieron en 1927 cuando tenía 17 años.  Athf1234 19:41, 22 de julio de 2005 (UTC)
Mucho wikipedista para hacer un artículo de mierda, me voy al escusado a vomitar--LloydTzara (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :File:Le-reve-1932.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Le-reve-1932.jpg

message: I have removed the following sentence from the Popular Culture section:
"Furthermore, Australian stand up comic Hannah Gadsby outlined Walter's story and Picasso's abuse of Walter in her 2018 special Nanette."
First of all, the sentence assumes Gadsby's mention of "abuse" is factual. Second, Gadsby only mentioned it in her stand-up routine, offering no sources - all she did was refer to the fact that Marie-Therese Walter was 17, and then falsely claimed that this made her underage - and this was the context in which the word "abuse" was used. The current age of consent in France is 15, but this is a recent one - it was certainly not higher in Walter's time. Picasso was himself from Spain, where the age of consent was 12 until 1999, and so he had even less reason to consider her underage. But even at the most conservative, 17 is well within the legal limits even in France, where they met. I do not think Gadsby's moral outrage and hyperbole in a stand-up routine should be used as any sort of source pointing to any alleged abuse.Tsuka (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Allegations of abuse
Talk:Bosh

message: This article has been changed to a disambiguation page as discussed on Vfd Bosh, in order to make it useful and to keep.  Please refrain from reverting back to the version proposed for deletion, as this will only get the article deleted or reverted back to the disambig version.  Thank you.  ∞Who?¿? 19:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: For an old VfD result, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bosh.  JYolkowski // talk 15:53, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD result
Talk:Gavin Lambert

message: User:Ted Wilkes has repeatedly, and biasedly, included references in the article that Lambert's biography on Natalie Wood is a gossip book in order to denigrate this source which has lots of positive reviews. Publishers Weekly says:
:Lambert follows her (Wood) from such childhood triumphs as Miracle on 34th Street to her breakthrough adult part opposite James Dean in Rebel Without a Cause. Wood's overlapping affairs with Rebel director Nicholas Ray and cast member Dennis Hopper, and brief romance with Elvis Presley, will be familiar material to aficionados. But Lambert reveals deep sensitivity and understanding of her development as an actress, and he's one of the few authors to capture the depth and beauty of her relationship with Robert Wagner. Lambert also effectively highlights Wood's shrewd professional moves, including her pretense to boss Jack Warner that she didn't want to star in Splendor in the Grass, because she knew he would refuse to let her appear in it if she displayed enthusiasm. The shooting of Wood's film with Robert Redford, Inside Daisy Clover, has special authenticity, since Lambert wrote the screenplay and witnessed her frustrations after several crucial voice-overs were cut from the final print. Details regarding Wood's tragic drowning are inevitably speculative and vital questions remain unanswered. But Lambert eloquently clarifies the self-destructive reasons behind Wood's addictions and insecurities, and in the end, readers will feel they truly know the subject more than they do in most biographies.
It seems as if this user's constant aim is to delete my contributions and denigrate my sources. See  He has also deleted the passage that there is a homosexual subtext in one of Lambert's films, although I have cited two sources on this discussion page which support my contribution that critics indeed saw this subtext. See  For the sources I have used, see above. I do not understand the aggressive editing tactics of this user. Onefortyone 19:39, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: Has anyone else out there seen a film based on Gavin Lambert's story "End of the Line" (about the blind & nearly deaf Countess whose "nieces" fake a European/North African trip for her while never leaving her home in LA)? I saw the film before reading the story in Lambert's THE SLIDE AREA.
 JoNSwift45 (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is driving me nuts 
Template talk:History of France sidebar

message: I see that the restoration has been spelt "Restauration". I've corrected this. AllanHainey 11:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the French spelling, traditionally used in English as well to refer specifically to the Bourbon Restoration. --Himasaram 01:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration

message: Use a lead image that is neutral WP:NPOV and representative for the whole history of the country, not just symbols of state. A geographic historic map is the best solution. Gryffindor (talk) 02:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image
Talk:Wentworth letter

message: The changes from the version printed in the Times and Seasons were made in 1851 and 1902 according to the article Articles of Faith, and I included those figures in the present article.  But the quote from JF Smith indicates the changes were made in 1921.  Can another editor resolve this discrepency?   --Blainster 20:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct dates are 1851 and 1902, corresponding to publication dates of editions of the Pearl of Great Price. The Tanners have scanned these PGP editions, and they indeed show the changes. I haven't checked the Joseph Fielding Smith cite, but if he actually said 1921, he's wrong. Also, he's wrong that the Articles of Faith was part of the Doctrine and Covenants. COGDEN 00:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial changes

message: The following at least needs a citation. It is controversial, even among some Mormon scholars.
: "Some have asserted that the First Vision was ignored, and was added to the proselyting message only recently.  However, this assertion ignored the 1832 account of the First Vision, the second attempt at writing an official history of the church. Also, it ignores the fact that early on, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints had no formal and systemized format for preaching the Gospel. (See the Preface to A Marvelous Work and A Wonder.)"  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.182.236.190 (talk) 19:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section
Template talk:User hy

message: Should we have a native Eastern Armenian speaker templete or will this do?  I think that it should just be native Armenian and not include eastern or western.  Like to hear other Armenians thoughts on my idea, or on ideas of their own.--Moosh88 20:37, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think in this case there's too little difference (the "n" at the end of "andzin") for it to matter. However, I think "մասնակից" may be a better translation of "user", and is used at http://hy.wikipedia.org; in that case there would be a bigger difference, since in Western Armenian, the word is "մասնագիձ" (I think, correct me if I'm wrong). So far in Wikipedia, I've been following conventions similar to those on US/UK English spelling. Whichever spelling is used by the creator of the article is used in the future, except in cases where the article topic pertains directly to one of the two cultures. In the Armenian case, this would probably mean that any location within current-day Armenia, or any person that gained fame under the Soviet rule would unconditionally be spelled using Eastern, while with historical places or figures (e.g. Saint Mesrob), whichever is used by the article creator is kept. So far there haven't been any real problems with that policy, but at some point it would be great to formalise it, since I can tell this may become a point of controversy in the future. --Aramգուտանգ 03:49, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think both "մասնակից" and ""մասնագիձ" will be problematic, for the reason you mentioned. On the other hand, the exclusion of the "n" will still be OK for Western Armenians, they'll feel something is missing, but it still is OK for their ears, for at least mines... In other languages like French, the equivalent of the term "personne" is used instead of "user." So andzi, is a good term here, and the text will be acceptable for Westerns and Easterns. Fadix (My Talk) 15:55, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

text: OK, so I guess we'll use "andzi" then. To type Armenian, if you're using Windows2000+, just add Armenian as an input locale in your keyboard control panel, and now that Wikipedia switched to unicode, you can just type Armenian text directly into the edit box. To use it in Word, you may need to download additional fonts though, but they're easy to find on the Internet. --Aramգուտանգ 18:49, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

text: I think you'll find everything you need at http://www.armunicode.org/en/, including instructions, keyboard layouts and fonts (in the "Contents" toolbar on the right). There are also some more Armenian fonts at http://www.cilicia.com/armo8.html. --Aramգուտանգ 21:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:One-liner program

message: That C program won't compile under gcc, main is int not void. You don't need the return explicity specified, so I propose to just delete the "void"? 84.93.243.76 20:47, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With 8-bit home computers, a one-liner was whatever fit in one BASIC line, typically around 255 characters. Since they often had 40 column or fewer displays, limiting to one line would remove an entire genre. --scruss (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2019 

message: The term "one liner" should only apply to something that when expressed on one line and the return is hit, then a meaningful answer is returned.
It gets murky when you include expressions. Bare expressions are only one-liners when they are typed into what would be an interpreter for the language of the expression.
Usually when talking of one-liners we mean one liners typed into a command line shell such as bash, sh, csh, tcsh, cmd.exe etc. Not a Python shell or other programming language shell (as opposed to the command-line shells built primarily to start programs written in other languages). 
One liners should then include the invocation of a specific compiler or interpreter together with the source to run and should give the required result after hitting return on that single line.
It would be wrong to state the following for example as an AWK one-liner:
  NR == 10
The proper statement would be something like:
  awk 'NR == 10' path_to_some_text_file
Similarly the perl equivalent below relies on showing the options to the perl invocation which are instrumental in making the command work:
  perl -n -e '($.==10) and print' text_file
Even though Python is my main programming language, the Python examples are very misleading because 
# They fail to state that they must be executed from the Python shell (which is marginal as they don't work from a command shell)
# They require input data that is not shown so do nothing if typed in as the first expressions of the python shell.
# Python is not a particularly good language for writing proper one-liners in. 
I think the main explanation needs changing and the Python examples removed. --Paddy (talk) 12:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Paddy you are wrong, the AWK examples were taken from the AWK book, They are in a section called examples of one-liners or something alike, They are called one-liners because are written in one-line pattern-action parts. You need to understand the AWK strcucture to see why. The volunteer who wrote that section omitted the explanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:106E:B:DCE2:B91C:FFCC:4813:8157 (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Not an Expression

message: I can't believe that this article has been around so long without any mention of the rich tradition of one-liners in BASIC. I shall see what I can do to remedy this --scruss (talk) 00:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASIC
Talk:History of the Anglican Communion

message: This article was spun off on July 22, 2005 from the Anglican Communion article. For edit history or talk page discussions prior to that date, please see that article's edit history. Doops |  talk 20:50, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spin off

message: A new WikiProject focussing on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion has just been initiated:  WikiProject Anglicanism.  Our goal is to improve and expand Anglican-reltaed articles.  If anyone (Anglican or non-Anglican) is interested, read over the project page and consider signing up.  Cheers! Fishhead64 06:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Anglicanism

message: There is a serious issue with what this paragraph is talking about; if I interpret it to refer purely to the COE, with Colonial Bishops, it makes some sense; if I interpret it as the Anglican Communion/Church, it makes NO sense, and is just plain bogus (especially in the first paragraph; there are at least ten churches in my Diocese that predate 1699, still in use, that either are still, or were until the American Revolution, Anglican).  I've changed the title to "Anglican Church" from "The Church", but even that's not right.  Even if I interpret it strictly as COE, then there are some issues; isn't the Anglican Church in Canada not part of COE now, but part of the Anglican Communion as the Anglican Church of Canada?  For an article about HISTORY, this section seems to be having trouble keeping it straight.  Can someone more authoritative than I please rewrite this to clear up some of the issues here?  Bill Ward 06:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglican Church in the colonies
Talk:Rampton Secure Hospital

message: Do we need to name individual patients?
GraemeE17 20:51, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *At http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rampton_Secure_Hospital&diff=100880048&oldid=100873796 I reverted a non-NPOV edit by User:Julie grant; it was her first edit. Could we discuss this alteration? Anthony Appleyard 15:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by Julie grant

message: I'm not sure how many musical references to Rampton there are, but the Anti Nowhere League just released a story concept album called 'The Road To Rampton' concerning the life of the main character who by the end of the album ends up being arrested and placed in the hospital in a song called 'Rampton'. Maybe someone wants to add this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.15.125 (talk) 20:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music References 

message: I've re-written much of the staff facility paragraphs in order to present a less personalised description and to tidy the style and tone. These still required citing for factual accuracy. Plutonium27 (talk) 11:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidy-Up 

message: Could anyone provide more information on the different wards and services available at Rampton for example the therapeutic villas, therapies etc etc it seems to me that this article only really focuses on the staff facilities or rather removal of and doesn't provide much information on the layout and facilities available to patients and also uses a lot of colloquial and subjective language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjudge123 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Content
Talk:Petit Basset Griffon Vendéen

message: I removed a possible copyright violation by anonymous user User:63.88.161.101.  The text was directly taken verbatim from here: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/AJFenton/BGV/About/bgvpbgv.htm.    Trysha 21:02, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bandit Brandon Momanyi-Frank is a white haired brother to a lab mix. At 3 months old he is full of energy and always smiling. He likes peanut butter cookies and climbing under the couch or bed to play chase. Unconfident of heights he whines when left on the couch or bed when left alone from humans or the other dogs. 2600:6C40:6100:DE1:6CEE:FD7F:25E:E7EB (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nottin but smiles 

message: This should be updated here soon, as this breed won its category and best in show. 173.216.89.26 (talk) 03:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best in show winner for 147th Westminster
Talk:Have a Nice Day (Bon Jovi album)

message: This is a hard rock album, with minor heavy meal elements. It should either only be Hard Rock or have HR first.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.81.33.59 (talk) 01:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 

message: I divided Have a Nice Day (Bon Jovi album)#Personnel into subsections for "Bon Jovi" "Additional musicians" and "Recording personnel" and I intended for that to be a good edit.--Kevjgav (talk) 14:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Have a Nice Day (Bon Jovi album)#Personnel 

message: Hey,
just wanted to know if it was ok to add "pop metal" as a genre on this album? Explicitly stated as being a part of this genre in this reference: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2005/sep/18/popandrock.shopping
Thanks!! AgentKozak (talk) 18:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Pop metal as a genre on this article
Talk:Smartdust

message: Sort of related:
http://www.smartwater.com - Omegatron 21:12, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
----------------
I'm not sure why "motes" redirects to this page.  "mote" is a much broader topic than nanotechnology or anything listed on this page currently.
: Not anymore. — Omegatron 21:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Contagious Diseases Acts

message: I've added section headings and performed some text edits.  The article is still light on information:
*India:  Re-enacted?  When was it enacted and repealed?  How is UK law relevant to India?  Expert comment needed in the article on this
*Other nations: incomplete and more information needed
*Areas: What areas were relevant?  Expert commentary with a list would be beneficial.
Adding an expert tag to see if one will come and expand this
Fiddle Faddle 06:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed cleanup tag, but work remains 

message: "It was because of men that there was demand for prostitutes, "
Hmm... this is like saying "because of blacks there is a lot of crime in the ghetto"
"As military men were discouraged from marriage and homosexual behaviour was criminal, prostitution was considered a necessary evil."
Only because it was illegal men did not engage in homosexual behavior?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomtul2 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  huge unstated assumptions 

message: The article currently refers to a "chatnam prostitute".  What does chatnam mean? Should it have a capital C, and is it a misspelling of a place name? Trafford09 (talk) 23:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain chatnam 

message: There's a fascinating account here:
Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: This Article is not expansive enough, and each of the 3 CD acts need their own subsections added to the contents, detailing exactly what each of them comprised of. There is no data in the CD acts section to describe the forced internal examinations that women underwent, and to make it clear and concise as to how each successive law expanded upon its previous limitations, stating things such as "The Act of 1864 stated that women found to be infected could be interned in locked hospitals for up to three months, a period gradually extended to one year with the 1869 Act." is not good enough. This article needs to be much more detailed, precise and informative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtemisLogic (talk • contribs) 04:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs more information added
Talk:Brookfield, Illinois

message: Frederick A. Krehbiel founded the company Molex in Brookfield during the late 1930s Walhonding (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of a notable person
Talk:Hot Digital Tracks

message: "The Hot Digital Tracks was created in 2003, but digital downloads would not count towards the charts until 2005."
This sentence makes no sense.  Would downloads not count toward other charts (e.g. the Hot 100)?
Acegikmo1
Oh, sorry, I can see where you got confused...let me try to rephrase it. OmegaWikipedia 11:29, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Innocents (1961 film)

message: Blatantly biased discussion of film. ZephyrAnycon 21:34, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears a considerable amount of POV has been removed.K8 fan 03:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?

message: Is this article complete enough to no longer be classified as a Stub? It appears to meet all the criteria of a Start-class article now.K8 fan 03:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrading from Stub 

message: This article is incomplete and requires more attention be given to it. Some information is unsourced and either needs to be removed or given proper citations when necessary. Other pieces of information are placed in sections that don't pertain to its information. Information such as the film's release should be placed in a release section which should be created and split into sub-section detailing the film's theatrical and home media releases. The reception section appears to be disorganized and should be reorganized and rewritten whenever necessary. If there is enough information to suggest that the film had mixed to negative reception on its initial release, then the reception section should be split into sub-sections detailing its initial response and later response. This article has potential to become GA and FA status if enough attention is given to it. Hopefully someone will come along to give this article the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation, Cleanup , and Expansion
Category talk:American scientists

message: There seem to be two categories for American scientists -  :Category:American scientists and :Category:United States scientists. Which one is to be used? Twthmoses 21:36, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: as "United States" is a noun and "American" is an adjective, I'd go with "American scientists". Gentgeen 23:44, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled