lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Framing error

message: In my opinion, it doesn't make sense to talk about a "framing error" as a thing independent from a "frame".
I suggest merging all the "framing error (...)" articles into a subheading of the corresponding "frame (...)" articles.
Then this "framing error" disambiguation page could keep the general definition that applies to all kinds of frames and framing errors, and link directly to the various subheadings.
Any objection?
--75.37.225.73 03:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas Mikolajcik

message: This page should not be a copyright violation - the source link provided is a public domain work of the U.S. Government : http://www.af.mil/main/disclaimer.asp M412k 03:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to see. Once the stuff is restored by an admin, we can get about changing it into proper WP style, then. --Alvestrand 05:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Lake Sagaris

message: Notability is demonstrated by reviews that have appeared in various publications, and especially by being a finalist for the Governor General's Award. --Eastmain 04:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only provides the basic information on the topic (and is somewhat disorganized with it too), and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of journalism would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 05:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Sudbury–White River train

message: The spaced en dash in the title should be replaced with an un-spaced en dash, as in the "a New York–Los Angeles flight" example in MOS:NDASH. To be exact, 
:Sudbury – White River train
should be corrected to
:Sudbury–White River train
—Jim10701 (talk) 08:26, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title needs to be corrected 
Talk:AFL Army Award

message: I have recreated the page AFL Army Award without copyrighted material.  This note has been entered as requested. BartBart 04:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Hotline

message: I'm a Wikipedian of several months standing who is starting to expand on people and publications associated with National Journal and the Atlantic Media Company. I am a former writer for The Hotline, so please feel free to point out where I may drift toward NPOV, although I intend to edit these sections -- particularly this one -- in good faith. Just FYI, in the interests of full disclosure. --WWB 04:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:IBM Lotus Domino

message: my mail link is not opened in server level , but it will work in local , what should i do?
:i dunno. i'm running on mac os x --frogger3140 (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

message: This entry needs to be improved - it's light on facts.  I'll slot it in as something to do.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eolasuile (talk • contribs) 15:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light on details 

message: This article is not worth wikipedia style, this article is a plain simple an advertisement... reliable, security-rich, blah and the product links point directly to the ibm website. Well done IBM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.92.145.216 (talk) 19:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PR language 

message: The article implies that this software enables several people to collaborate on one document.
Does the software keep older versions of that document, or does it only keep the latest version of that document?
In other words,
Is Lotus Domino a distributed revision control system?
In other words,
Does this article need the :category: distributed revision control systems tag,
or does it need the :category: distributed data storage systems tag?
--DavidCary (talk) 13:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Lotus Domino a distributed revision control system?
Talk:SS Sapona

message: The article indicates that the stern broke off the ship in 2004. This is not true. The stern has been separated from the main wreck since at least the 1960s (when I first started going there), and most likely since the 1920s. There was additional damage during the 2004 hurricanes, but the initial separation of the stern happened much, much earlier.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.193.252 (talk) 05:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing/Misleading
Talk:Salisbury School

message: The Salisbury School motto is "Esse quam videri." You can easily verify that this is indeed the correct motto by visiting the school's website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.109.254.21 (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

message: To prevent the list from being removed, please add notability proof of faculty status references.  -- Lucas20 (talk) 03:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the notable faculty list, as there are no references and this article seems very promotional in nature. I'll continue to clean it up. Netalarmtalk 00:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable faculty

message: I've removed all unsourced promotional content from the article. I've also removed details that are generally not included in articles on schools, such as the graduation requirements. Netalarmtalk 02:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All notable alumni are now properly cited. =D Major cleanup complete! Netalarmtalk 02:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up
Talk:Soulmate (Natasha Bedingfield song)

message: Please do not add the song's iTunes chart positions to the charts section of the article. This goes against Wikipedia:Record charts. Thanks. -- Underneath-it-All 03:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[iTunes]] charts 

message: There is clearly a piano in the song, though in this page no one is credited to play piano...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.30.44.147 (talk) 18:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  piano
Talk:History of social software

message: The paragraph beginning "Early manifestations..." makes absolutely no sense.  The first sentence seems to be missing something between "... and the like" and "and point...".  The second sentence is a fragment, with no verb.  I'd try to rewrite it, but I honestly have no idea what it's trying to say. I should delete it, but I figure that maybe someone actually knows what's really missing.  Rhsatrhs 04:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Badly Written
Talk:Peter Benjamin Graham

message: Peter Benjamin Graham is an unrecognized but significant Australian artist who is about to receive some long over due recognition in the form of a major exhibition in the Ballarat Fine Art Gallery in 2009.Philip1966 (talk) 07:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if this person is significant or not. Personally I think his inclusion may be fine. However, you should not remove that notice by yourself as you are the creator of the article. Just leave the hangon tag and an admin will come along and take a look at it. --Darkbane 04:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK I'm on the jobPhilip1966 (talk) 07:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from New Epoch Notation Painting
Talk:Lawrence Lambe

message: The 20:31, 26 November 2007 Belanidia version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia--Philopp (talk) 14:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: given that Lambe's birth and death was almost 20 years off Unless this is the guys father, I question how accurate this information is. I added a disputed tag. Ikip (talk) 18:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed your data are correct.--MWAK (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I added a disputed tag

message: Why is this publishing company cited in the book list? The works of Lambe were originally published in the late 19th ande early 20th century. It is only of secondary importance, whether they were re-issued at some point or not and by whom (especially when the re-issuing occurred after copyright expiration). --Gretarsson (talk) 11:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kessinger Publishing, LLC 
Talk:Lyube

message: it is not spelled Lubeh, but simply Lube with no h on the end
:I took the spelling from their url and from what others have told me the spelling. I know they have many spellings of their name, but I think this is the most correct. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in favour of keeping "Lubeh". It is the way the band itself transliterates is, for one thing. For another, words ending with are "э" a blind spot of WP:RUS, because there are very few Russian words that end with this letter. Having it be transliterated as "eh" if it's on the end of a word just makes more sense. Esn (talk) 10:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's spelled with "eh" 'cause final "e" is silent in English. "É" (as in "café" or "Pokémon") can be used for the same purpose as well.
«Rasseya, "Russia" with a typically patriotic spelling variation». Patriotic? Actually, «Rasseya» is word from the vocabulary of rabble. 77.239.236.133 (talk) 12:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Любе. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Любе" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Triangle Lake, Oregon

message: I've heard you're supposed to wear cutoffs too, or face the consequences. But no, not likely to be challenged, but since I specialize in community articles, I've seen how everyone wants to add their two cents (read: original research) about the best fishin' holes, restaurants, gas stations, etc. in a given place, so I like to make sure that kind of stuff is cited, however marginally. And since I pride myself on starting fully cited articles, I like to keep them that way. :) It also makes it easier when someone wants to add to the article. Katr67 (talk) 22:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. I'll keep an eye out for a better source. That's the kind of thing that may show up in a print guidebook somewhere. For now the online source should do.Northwesterner1 (talk) 23:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I forgot to say that William L. Sullivan might have something on it. He's got a guidebook for everything. Katr67 (talk) 23:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock slide ref
Talk:Kiosk (band)

message: The clips linked at the bottom of the article are OK because they were posted by the Record Label company (Bamahang) themselves. See for yourself.--Zereshk 05:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Youtube links

message: * Notability of the albums not established, according to WP:Nalbums they should rediredt to the band article. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums 

message: This article was recenty updated and well sourced. Can we remove the message on top of the article claiming it is not well sourced?64.131.184.96 (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: This article has multiple issues
Talk:Emblem of Sri Lanka

message: Just give blazons rather than these vague descriptions! It will make it so much easier. --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 03:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blazons 
Talk:Mikołaj Zieleński

message: It would be nice if someone could translate the German article on Zielenski. Chubbles 05:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The dates proffered are purely speculative and have no basis in the historical record nor in published research. (I wish there were more, and perhaps this will spur someone [outside Poland] to action.) The only - only - date we have for anything related to Zielenski is the 1611 publication date; there simply isn't any other date we can attach to him, unless something new's been published that I haven't seen yet. The Library of Congress, and perhaps a couple of older reference works, occasionally give circa decades, but these are complete guesswork, and Grove is silent on the matter. If we are to add dates they need to be supported by fact and by published research, and none of either has been provided. Chubbles (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:Semi-Open Game

message: As a matter of interest are the following referenced as Semi-Open Game in MCO-14?
# 1.e4 f5 Fred Defense
# 1.e4 f6 Barnes Defense
# 1.e4 Nf6 Alekhine's Defense
# 1.e4 g5 Borg Defense
# 1.e4 g6 Modern Defense
# 1.e4 h5 Goldsmith Defense
# 1.e4 h6 Carr´s Defense
# 1.e4 Nh6 Adams Defense
Prior to reading this article my understanding was these are not covered in semi-opening game, at least not from my recollection of the 'Semi-Open Game in Action' by Anatoly Karpov. ChessCreator (talk) 04:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

message: 1.e4 b5 Larson Gambit is not in MCO-15 or the Oxford Companion.  Someone tagged it for "cite needed".  I think it should be removed, unless someone comes up with a source.  Bubba73 (talk), 00:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Never come across that name. Collecting names of openings happens to be one of my esoteric hobbies, and according to my records 1. e4 b5 is the Guest Gambit, but I'm afraid I can't remember where I got that from. A quick Google search reveals other names: Rostgaard Variation and Meijers Opening. 91.105.56.175 (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I'm going to remove it.  Bubba73 (talk), 00:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1. e4 b5
Talk:Marbles Kids Museum

message: Todd Cohen, the writer from the Philanthropy Journal of North Carolina has apparently been the most vocal critic of Exploris, some examples (a far from comprehensive list):
*
*
*
*
*
As to the current state of the discussion, however, I have not seen information any more detailed or recent than what I've put in the article.  I just thought this information would be useful for some future editors. theanphibian 05:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This page doesn't need a rewrite, it just needs more depth.--Rtphokie 22:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite
Talk:Solid Edge

message: If you are going to mark something for deletion please give people chance to respond.
I agree that the previous version should have been deleted. It contained personal comments (positive and negative) about the software and contain large sections of copied marketing material.
What I have added I believe is neutral and factual and corresponds to content I added in articles of similar software (SolidWorks/NX/Cata).
If you believe this text needs to be deleted please be specific to what you object to and we can discuss if this information should be removed from all other articles on CAD software.
*The problem isn't that it had positive or negative information.  The problem is that it's unverifiable as it cites no reliable sources, and it's not a company that calls for encyclopaedic notice WilyD 12:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and Notability

message: The self-described marketing director for Solid Edge, User:SolidEdgeGuRu, has posted what I consider to be blatant advertising for his/her product in this article, and has ignored three editors who called it that.  It was tagged, by someone else, with  two weeks ago, but there has been no improvement.  In a few minutes, I'm going to remove most of it.  The lead seems to be a slight improvement, so after reviewing once more I'll probably keep that, but everything else will be reverted back to the pre-ad version.
I haven't taken this to WP:COIN because I didn't have the time to figure out the procedure before going on vacation.  However, if this ad copy is reinserted, I will, and am very confident that other editors there will agree this does not belong here.
I have asked SolidEdgeGuRu a couple of times to comply with WP:COI, but he/she has not done so.  I don't know much about this subject, so I can't really re-write it myself, nor can I judge its notability, and whether it deserves a PROD or an AfD, but I know ad copy when I see it. --barneca (talk) 23:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing blatant ad copy 

message: As far as I know - the official solid edge website still says ST6 - so this is probably false marketing ploy as far as I can tell. Someone should look into this before I or someone else remove that from history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.141.142.3 (talk) 17:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solid Edge ST7?
Talk:Metol

message: This page says that Metol belongs to a section of alcohol. Despite the trade name Metol and the presence of -OH this is not usually an alcohol. I think it should be reclassified.--Phototech21 06:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why alcohol??

message: The link to the Oxford MSDS under Hazards has been removed since 2011. Not my area, so I don't know a fix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBoaN (talk • contribs) 01:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxford MSDS
Talk:Romig Middle School

message: I'm not sure if this was ever an actual article, but every single piece of information on the page is obvious bunk. If somebody can come up with some real information on this school, then let them re-create it. But as of now it's not afflicted with vandalism, it IS vandalism. BullzeyeComplaint Dept./Contribs) 03:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What happened was that a bunch of idiots vandalized the page and turned it into a piece of crap.  Fortunately, I found out this school existed, and found a decent enough version to revert back to.  It's been semi-protected so it'll be harder to vandalize. Blueboy96 04:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD Nomination

message: Interestingly, we do have a "Crazy Super Genius" (AKA Gifted/Highly Gifted) team, which I myself happen to be a member of. Not kidding. Thought technically it's called team Sibualbuali (Side note: Autocorrect wants me to change that to Bilingualism), after the supervolcano. Our teachers were a bit angry at the time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hppavilion1 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Crazy Super Genius Team
Talk:Wink murder

message: This comment is in reference to TAG: "This section may contain original research or unverified claims." with reference to the section titled "Killer variant".
The entire article was tagged for deletion some time ago; see the discussion page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wink_murder.   It was determined there are enough references to validate that this game exists.
There are numerous references to this parlour game being referred to as  "Wink Murder", "Wink Wink Murder", "Killer Wink" or "Wink Killer" and so on.  I expect it may also be known by several other names as well.  I personally learned the dark room, candle, card version of this game as "Killer" and taught it to at least thirty other people over the years.  Google "Killer Game" to find several good references with numerous variants of both the name of the game and how it is played.  I have removed the tag.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thor21 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a lot of games called "Killer" out there, and I can't see any obviously useful sources. I've put an "unsourced" tag on the section instead. --McGeddon (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

text: And a couple of months later, I've cut the tabletop candles-and-supporting-votes "Killer" variant. It sounds like a great game, but I can't find any secondary sources that have written about it or linked it to "Wink Murder". For anyone wishing to read about it or restore it with references, this was the latest version of the article that contained it. --McGeddon (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Killer

message: Idem 31.4.157.59 (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the same game as policias y ladrones; these are different games
Talk:Boans

message: Good work Moondyne Fancyfootwork 13:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Erzgebirgisch

message: Aß t'r Niemeyer seine Schustern in de Kerch zur Trau keführt prengt ae Vugelsteller Vugel un hot Baeden kratelirt; is k' schaen den 25. Oktober 1759. Clasthol, kedrueckt bey den Buchdruecker Wendeborn.
Klick auf mit enanner ihr statlig'n Harrn!
Do stellt sich d'r Toffel aach ein aus der Farrn,
Hahr hot sich ju kraets schunt de Fraehaet kenumme,
Su iß'r aach diesmohl mit reiner kekumme.
Se hahn ne ju suest wos ze luesen kekahn:
Ich hoh schiene Vugel, wolln sie se besahn?
When Niemeyer lead his bride to the church for wedding, bird trader Vogel speaks and gratulates the both; It happened on Oktober 25th in 1759. Clasthol, printed by printer (or: editor, lit. "book printer") Wendeborn.
Welcome you all, you imposing men!
Everyone from far away is comming to see it
Here has one taken the liberty,
So he (meant is everyone) has come now.
They are looking if they can get advantage of this:
I have nice birds, do you want to see them?
I've tried to give the gist of the poem, so it is a very free translation (I'm not quite shure if i got the point), i also translated some items in the lexicon within the article. (for discussion and critics please consult my user page in German Wikiedia: de:Benutzer:Patrixx)--139.18.180.50 08:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put the translation into the article so that it can be edited by those who understand the language. I did some editing myself. Maybe somebody can put a literal translation into Standard German here or, better, into the German article. This would make things easier.  Andreas  (T) 13:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The translation is not correct. It doesn't refer to "everyone", it is always the birdseller who is meant. --Thogo (Talk) 17:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected it (and some other things in that section). Sorry for the many edits that I needed. --Thogo (Talk) 17:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  try of a translation of sect. 5
Talk:Direct stiffness method

message: The math on this page should be rewritten using LaTeX syntax. --Berland 06:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

message: ok, I think we may have a conflict of topics between this article, this article: Matrix stiffness method and this article: Finite element method in structural mechanics. They seem to be on almost the same idea. --fs 21:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that as well, I propose a merging. Lord Metroid (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've just merged Matrix Stiffness Method into Direct Stiffness Method. Kallog (talk) 05:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of topics 