Talk:AboutUs.com

message: A separate section for this type of content is directly discouraged by WP:NPOV. As all of the content has to do with the site's content, it should be merged with the "contents" section. VanTucky Talk 20:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism and controversy 

message: According to Meta, AboutUs.org is the largest mediawiki wiki out there. See the List of the largest wikis. This should most definitely be mentioned once in the article. VanTucky 22:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest MediaWiki wiki 

message: I see no traffic info anywhere. Considering that we have 500 million uniques and we're close to being within the top 1k sites (according to Alexa), I think it's important to add this info. It may be most NPOV to average the traffic info from a couple sources. Steven Walling (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: * 500 million uniques?  I don't think so.  Stats added. --Simonkoldyk (talk) 16:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, that was a typo. That would be pretty nuts :) Anyway, Google Analytics is telling us 5 million a month currently. More importantly, the stat you used to cite the article was for only U.S. visitors, which is (to say the least), not an accurate measurement. Steven Walling (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic information 

message: Here are several new references for a fresh investment round, hits to our site, and the number of employees. The first is from the Portland Business Journal, the second is from The Oregonian's tech blog,  and the third is from TechFlash in Seattle. Steven Walling (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also coverage from TechCrunch now. Steven Walling (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New references 

message: I just noticed an edit which changed the article to list some new people as founders of the company. I would like to point out that while the people added are business partners and investors in AboutUs (Westerdal through the company NameIntelligence and Stahura through eNom), neither person is actually a part of the company's staff nor are they are part of the founding team in any operational way. 
None of the independent sources in the article (such as TechCrunch or the Portland Business Journal) mention Westerdal and Stahura as founders, and the addition was made without any supporting reference. If someone could correct the article to accurately reflect the history of the company, that would be great. I would just do it, but I have a consulting gig with AboutUs and I would prefer to stay hands off. Thanks, Steven Walling 00:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founders 

message: They are clearly spamming scum who are trying to game Google's rankings. I am sure bloggers could be found complaining about the copying of their content (which they sometimes embed in their pages in HTML comments even after agreeing to "remove" it). This article as it stands is unrealistically positive. 86.128.241.168 (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No criticism section?! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on AboutUs.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.portlandtribune.com/rethinking/story.php?story_id=120430910578805900
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070307191644/http://blog.domaintools.com:80/2007/02/network-solutions-and-registercom-join-aboutusorg-project/ to http://blog.domaintools.com/2007/02/network-solutions-and-registercom-join-aboutusorg-project/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion