lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beijing West railway station

message: Uh... where is the source for the "largest station" claim? Colipon+(T) 04:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Source found of the rough guide, seat61 might be another better source. 58.35.54.33 (talk) 12:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest Station

message: There is inconsistent capitalisation among Beijing railway stations. For instance, Beijing South Railway Station is all capitalised, while this one is not.
Bathrobe (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation

message: I'm supposed to be expanding the Beijing West railway station article with text translated from its Chinese-language counterpart (which has featured-article status); in fact, the layout of the expanded article will be based on said counterpart. I started this expansion in April of 2019, with the "Overview" section. I want to admit that I've hit a few snags with this translation-expansion plan, specifically in the "The Second Plan: 1981-85" section, in which I stopped at the first paragraph because of poor translation (in the second paragraph, there was stuff like "Lotus Pond" and "Too Liquid Pool"). Unfortunately, this is typical for most translation/expansion jobs in Wikipedia. I also checked to see if the links to the other Chinese articles have English-Wikipedia equivalents. Can any active Wikipedia translators help me in this effort, please? Jim856796 (talk) 13:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , please provide sources for the text you copied from zh wiki. ETI 15TrSF (Chat Box) 00:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing Translation-Expansion Effort
Talk:Lwaxana Troi

message: The name of the TNG episode where Lwaxana Troi appears for the third time is "Menage a Troi". Of course the original French term is menage-a-trois but the episode's name is a pun on her surname Troi.  — JIP | Talk 05:46, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the purpose of the appearance column in the episode list? Marky1981 00:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list
Talk:Brody

message: Is "Pototski" correct (three places in article?) Is this a different name than Potocki (like Jan Potocki)? -- Jmabel | Talk 18:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pototski  

message: "a significant number of … Scots". Really? There must be a story worth telling there. - Jmabel | Talk 18:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scots 

message: The Yiddish transliteration is of the word "wanderer", not of "Brody". Is this what was meant ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.0.113.146 (talk) 11:46, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yiddish transliteration
Talk:Auditory phonetics

message: I'm new to this article. The few remarks on the Talk page seem to suggest that there used to be some material here that has since been removed. Auditory Phonetics is, I think, an important subject and ought to have a fuller coverage than it currently gets. Does anyone know if there is some earlier discussion about what this should contain? RoachPeter (talk) 09:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auditory phonetics content
Talk:Stand Inside Your Love

message: I really believe The Everlasting Gaze should have its own page, not only because it was featured on the Greatest Hits Video Collection DVD but because it has an awesome video and I believe is the first to have Melissa auf der Maur in the band. Paranoid-andrew 05:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Everlasting Gaze 
Category talk:Protected areas by country

message: A previous discussion on the defunct Category:National parks by country, since archived, resulted in the creation of this category.  As the category suggestion implies, this category is for the most-general "conservation area" in a given country.  WP:CFD decided to leave it up to individual country editors to put the appropriate subcategories here, since we didn't have the expertise to do this for every country of the world. -- Beland 06:56, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD
Talk:Duke of Beaufort (France)

message: Was Francois de Beaufort duc de Beaufort? If so, can someone alter this page.  If not, should his page be corrected?  Jonathan O'Donnell 07:10, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was mention of a Duc de Beaufort  at the Duchess of Richmond's ball "Duc et Duchesse de Beaufort et Mademoiselle" who were these people? --PBS (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duc de Beaufort 1815
Category talk:Anatomy

message: Most of the articles in this category need to be moved into a subcategory. -- Beland 07:23, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: have started on behalf of the wikipedia: WikiProject Preclinical Medicine. Please visit that page for more information. PhatRita 16:02, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

text: a dentistry sub category could be useful. category: dental anatomy, a sub cat of head and neck perhaps? PhatRita 16:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: have finished the movement process. PhatRita 17:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rhinoceros (song)

message: I added what I've always thought is a (vaguely) logical explanation for the title. I'm unaware if it has ever actually been confirmed. Feel free to remove it as speculation if you like. Everyking 07:44, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Isn't it spelled with a "U"? Steveprutz 21:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RhinoceroUs? 
Talk:Henry Baker (naturalist)

message: Needs disambiguation. The current disambiguation policy says that it is acceptable to have several small articles under one heading, but with an entry for a person, this seems to test the policy. In the case of Henry Baker, and, I suspect, most biographical entries, the structure at the beginning of the article so strongly favors the first "meaning" of the article name that few would ever scan down to see that there is another person associated with the article.
Unsure of how to handle this, I'd like to hear what others think.
--Zippy 07:54, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hardened aircraft shelter

message: Can anyone please explain the word tabvee in that context, please? 84.173.245.191 19:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TabVee 

message: I propose expanding the scope of this article to Airbase defense (here is a detailed source on the topic). Currently the entire "Alternatives" section is somewhat off topic but its valuable information that can be fixed by expanding the scope of the topic of this article.VR talk 21:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Aṭṭhakavagga and Pārāyanavagga

message: After looking at this page again, I think it's problematic at its current location. The article currently gives very little information about why the texts it discusses might be considered the earliest form of Buddhism, whereas an article about Earliest Buddhism be a balanced discussion of what texts and other evidence might reveal about the subject, focusing primarily on the available evidence pro and con. Even the external link that is the major source for this article doesn't discuss much about why the texts are considered to be earlier. Considering its narrow focus, I think the article should be moved: the best place for it would probably be Atthakavagga and Parayanavagga. - Nat Krause 11:16, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move?

message: There is no french study about these points.. Thx Wikipedia, thanks to the contributors of this article.  well, i was about to add : be proud,but ^^   pyl 00:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just thanks 
Talk:18446744073709551616 (number)

message: Diagree with the speedy deletion nomination, if this is a power of 2 the number has some notability. At least: list this on vfd, not speedy deletions please. Sjakkalle 08:43, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 763692111147737707 2603:8081:A300:34E1:EF6B:FFFB:B758:8364 (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

message: https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/14671904?subquery=%7B%22queryTerm%22:%22TX0003256472%22,%22fieldHeading%22:%22Registration%20Number%22,%22searchType%22:%22Is%20(exact)%22%7D 2603:8081:A300:34E1:EF6B:FFFB:B758:8364 (talk) 12:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/14671904?subquery=%7B%22queryTerm%22:%22TX0003256472%22,%22fieldHeading%22:%22Registration%20Number%22,%22searchType%22:%22Is%20(exact)%22%7D 

message: There is an old Chinese story about a king, who took a checkers/chess board and said to hid servants to put 1 rice on each square, but multiply it by 2 every square, on the first square (a1) they put 1 rice. on the second square they putted 2 rice pieces. On the third one they put 4 rice pieces, on the fourth they put 8 and so on and so on. before they have reached half of the board, they were unable to put rice on a square, and on the 22nd piece the rice supply had ended. And when you reach the last square, the 32nd square, its more stars than the entire universe. (The number is 18446744073709551616) 46.121.245.195 (talk) 11:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check it
Talk:UK railway stations – C

message: During the templatisation of stations A & C, I have been more ambitious: I have turned every station name into a ... link. This exercise added eight new blue links: North London Line plus Chadwell Heath and a nice long article on Chingford.
But it has created over 300 red links, many of which may never get filled.
Could I have a policy decision please: 
* create red links as here or
* leave without links until articles get written?
NB. The dots are vital if you want me to remove the red links and the dots can be removed swiftly if the red links are to be kept. -- RHaworth 08:43, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)
*My vote is to keep the red links. Provided there is some chance of an article eventually appearing, I would always prefer to see a red link rather than no link at all. And as the number of extant station article shows, there is a good chance more will arrive. -- Chris j wood 00:58, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Red or Black?
Talk:Timeline of the Republic of China

message: Is the mini-links between Quemoy, Matsu and PRC's Fujian province part of Taiwanese history? Or is it part of ROC history?  — Instantnood 09:12, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
----
I'm really impressed with what everyone has already done here. I've written about this timeline on my blog, and I've tried to add some data from my own notes. I will do more later.
kerim 17:46, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Equol

message: This article doesn't actually say what Equol is, just that it's metabolized from Daidzein. DaveTheRed 09:26, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: As to be read in the Dihydrotestosterone article, deficiency of DHT is related to sexual and non-sexual problems, such as Alzheimer. So Equol isn't that perfectly great. Thanks, --Abdull 20:13, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  drawbacks 

message: The article S-equol should be merged into this article because they both cover the same topic.  When they are merged, attention should be paid to focus the article more on the studies that are WP:MEDRS-compliant, rather than on preliminary studies, speculations, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.189.211 (talk) 00:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: 91.155.24.127 (talk) 17:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Equol human test in research use only, or can consumers buy the test (urine, fecal or whatever lab test)?
Talk:Andrew Weatherall

message: Several articles link here.  Rich Farmbrough 09:40, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Illinois Route 40

message: I removed the statement "The Baker Bridge will not be replaced." at the end of the article, as this statement is highly unlikely, given that it's Interstate 74.  I was under the impression that a major portion of the $300,000,000 being spent on Upgrade 74 is for replacing the floor of the Murray Baker.  If I have somehow missed this news, please put the statement back and leave message on my talk page. --Closeapple 09:56, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)
: Well, there's the timeline for Upgrade 74 -- they're closing the bridge for 6 months so that they can remove 150 feet of truss. It would probably be impossible to completely replace an entire bridge in 6 months. Also, a mile-long bridge by itself would cost well over $300,000,000 -- the new northern St. Louis bridge has a price tag of well over $1 billion, assuming it gets built. See http://www.newriverbridge.org/faqlist.asp. Add to this the fact that the construction zone is about 6 miles long. ---Rob 03:45, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Illinois Route 29

message: I haven't done the research to be sure how (or if) 29 moves from Adams Street to Washington Street downtown before crossing the Cedar Street Bridge.  Could be confusing if it's not added. --Closeapple 10:15, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)
: I would wait to see how IL 29 is rerouted after the Upgrade 74 project is done before editing anything. ---Rob 20:35, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

message: How is Illinois 31 the next route after Illinois 24? —Rob (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not.  This is the article for Illinois 29; Illinois 24 was decommissioned, and now the Illinois 24 article redirects to Illinois 29. Omnedon 15:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right... so I understand the US 24 being prior. What about IL 25 or US 30? —Rob (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the old version.  As I look at it, it seems like the "previous_route" should be ILL 26, and the "next_route" should be "U.S. 30 in Illinois" (as is currently in the top set of browse links).  But then why is there a second set of browse links under that, and a reference to ILL 24 (which doesn't exist any longer)?  Perhaps the second set of links (the "browse" tag) should just be removed.  But again, perhaps there is a purpose here which I'm missing.  Omnedon 17:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IL 31 after 24? 
Talk:Reality hacker

message: What's up with this page? Is it a disambiguation? The first statement, "a reality hacker IS an Urban Spelunker" implies that this page should merely be a redirect to urban spelunker. 193.13.57.216 11:00, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: hack is a the my sond urban your hack 49.149.219.212 (talk) 16:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

message: Why is this page protected? I can't find the reasoning anywhere. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 20:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, if you look at the logs, , you'll see it was protected during the period of Colbert vandalism.. when comedian Colbert told people to edit the Reality page. If you want to edit, I suggest bringing it to WP:RPP, an admin will un-protect.  Danski14 22:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection
Talk:First Alcibiades

message: Removed
: 
from article page - I just split the two:
#Give room to the discussion of the Socratic dialogues about Alcibiades, separately from Alcibiades' bio, that is already quite extended, and can still be extended further.
#Categorise the Alcibiades article as a "dialogue" somehow doesn't make much sense.
--Francis Schonken 11:02, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed merge
Talk:International Peace Mission movement

message: Until WP:verifiable references are provided, I believe this article should be reduced to a stub based on the current intro. At the very least, the controversial claims in the "other personalities" section should be removed. 1292simon (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  trim 

message: — Assignment last updated by KeeLgd (talk) 22:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Media, Activism, and Social Movements
Talk:Bihar

message: The  used on this page is going to be replaced with  as per the Proposal and Consensus of RFC. Any questions/suggestions? Discuss Here.
You can also contribute by replacing Infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory on other pages , or by improving this one. Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced — Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox replacement 

message: update the the population data according to the 2023 census conducted in bihar. Jmurravi (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Editors can update it, if they provide citations to a reliable source that supports their changes.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Can't be done. This is a survey and not a census. Survey data is considered official. Census data is official. Anways leaving this debate, Bihar Government has taken back the report of the survey because of some mistakes. Doesn't make any sense. Shaan SenguptaTalk 16:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update population data  

message: It looks like you added the citation "Mishra Pankaj, The Problem, Seminar 450 – February 1997" on 19 November 2008 (in this edit) in support of the claim that Buddhism originated in Bihar. This sounds like a lecture given as part of a class? Wikipedia requires sources to be durably archived for verification purposes, so is there a recording of this lecture anywhere, or is it actually a text of some kind? This topic is complicated and disputed, so it would be helpful to find a source that is more specific than simply "arose", especially in the body text. It would also be good to know if the underlying sources are religious texts, or evidence found by historians or archaeologists. -- Beland (talk) 21:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing for origin of Buddhism
Talk:Regions of Chile

message: With the Dec 19th change in the regions, a new map should be made.  Is anyone up to it? --JAXHERE | Talk 00:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  new map needed 

message: As far as i'm aware, there's no intention of abolishing the Roman numerals. The two new Regions have been assigned new numerals and also I read that the Constitution requires them to determine the timing for Senatoril elections (the odd numbered regions are due for senatorial elections in 2010). GringoInChile 10:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roman numerals to be abolished?!?

message: I've removed the external links from the article because the first one is simply not accurate even though it comes from what one might expect to be a reliable source.  The second link just doesn't work. --JAXHERE | Talk 16:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of external links section 

message: As a student/wikipedia editor I would be easier for me to see the reoman nujmerals of the regions next to the names. For example: Region de Antofagasta II DiegoTalksMonke (talk) 13:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers on regions
Talk:Mojikyō

message: Are the "1,875 Sanskrit characters" Devanagari ligatures? It is questionable that they should be listed under "extinct", since the script is also used for living languages. dab (ᛏ) 12:14, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: never mind, I figured it out, it's Siddham. dab (ᛏ) 12:15, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, my fault. -- Toytoy 12:40, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
甲骨文字 - Oracle Bone Characters
In the database site for Mojikyo it says that there are 甲骨文字 3,401字 see . Here on this page, we see there are are 3398 characters. I've downloaded all the characters from the site for the 24x24 gifs and found only 3348, which may be due to there being some which didn't cache properly in my browser. So, there seems to be a slight difference of around 3 characters, or as many as 63 characters... Dylanwhs 16:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, after counting the number of characters in the Konyaku Mojikyo Character Map, I get 3354 Oracle Bone characters listed there. Since this is definitive on the 2002 version, I shall alter the article to reflect this. Dylanwhs 08:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The only English language links refer to CD/DVD sales  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.147.73 (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If significant numbers of people in Japan are using it for text processing, then it can be notable on that grounds.  We have articles on Microsoft Word etc. -- AnonMoos (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this NOT an ad for a commercial website?
Talk:Salt

message: why salt extracted from crude oil is nowhere published MRANAND.M (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any evidence that salt is extracted from crude oil? Grachester (talk) 06:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Perhaps because it's a secret only you know about? I've never heard of it. If you have a reliable source that tells us all about it, please share it and maybe we can add it here. HiLo48 (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why salt extracted from crude oil is nowhere published 

message: Right above where the history section begins, it says 2000mg or the equivalent to 5 grams. 2000mg is 2 grams :) 174.242.221.216 (talk) 05:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: nevermind, i see my mistake. sodium is part of salt, not consisting 100% of it. the other is cloride lmao my b. 174.242.221.216 (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 November 2023 

message: Second to last sentence in second to last paragraph of first section: "such as sea salt and table salt, which latter usually contains" -> "such as sea salt and table salt, the latter of which usually contains" (bolding mine) ReidLeek (talk) 16:57, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks for picking that up. HiLo48 (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request: grammatical error
Talk:Umaid Bhawan Palace

message: Well i have been to the muesum at the umeed bhavan and the estmates cost of making this building was around about Rs. 94 lakhs (94,00,000).That would be nice to include...what say?Yourdeadin 06:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, yes that would be good to put in.  Are there any references for that sum on the internet as it would be nice to include those too. --Counter-revolutionary 08:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost 

message: Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces has assigned User:Maxone999 the job of inserting enticing copy from the hotel brochures, and copyright corporate photos into all its Wikipedia entries: see these User Contributions. Someone with more tact than I have needs to explain.--Wetman (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 