lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Maine

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is white on blue? I get the general idea of trying to match the flag, but it doesn't exactly match. Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked other state templates and see no standard color used except I see some really ugly colors.  Yes, the dark blue color would be against WP:ACCESSIBILITY, especially for the color blind.  The WP:ACCESSIBILITY guidelines for background color hit featured list guidelines somewhat recently... maybe a year ago?  The default color used by  should be used. Bgwhite (talk) 06:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, I will go ahead and make the change.  By the way, it would be great if you could comment on any of the other state template pages (with odd color choices), if you have time. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  White on blue
Template talk:Louisiana

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: For Louisiana I suggest it is best to keep the template to the five regions based on the traditional map. It keeps it simple and it's backed by an expert source. This would mean that Northwest Louisiana would be relocated into a new article called North Louisiana. There is a page called List of regions of the United States, which makes sense for listing the 5 regions with any "more specific" subregions. -- Aaron charles 03:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regions

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: I'd like to add List of Louisiana state parks to the template to be consistent with Pennsylvania and Ohio's state template as well as other states whose list of state parks is well written.  Just checking to see if there is dissenting opinion.  I know it's in the category list, but it doesn't provide any information that the list does (size and establish year of parks, history, etc.) Thanks Michael miceli (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add State Parks to Template 

message: Add Fauna of Louisiana to topics. 2603:8001:400:B36D:81E8:FF8E:DD98:3442 (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: melecie  t - 03:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2022
Template talk:Kansas

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: Can we partially protect this template to reduce the vandalism? —Mike 20:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial protection 

message: Should Fort Riley be listed in the largest cities section?  It is listed as having a "The daytime population of nearly 25,000."  that would place it #17 on the population list, between Dodge City and Prairie Village.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities:  Fort Riley?
Template talk:Iowa

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates
Template talk:Indiana

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: REMOVE 'Brownsburg' from 'Largest towns' section:
1) Brownsburg is a city, not a town.
2) Currently in the 'Largest cities' section, only cities with a population of 30,000 (2010 Census) or more are included. If Brownsburg were to be listed under largest cities with a population of only 25,911, seven other more populous cities higher than Brownsburg but lower than 30,000 would be denied inclusion.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Indiana 69.209.229.206 (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done NiciVampireHeart 22:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2019
Template talk:Idaho

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: Large Cities are defined as 40,000 or more as of the 2007 Census estimate. Small Cities are between 10,000 and 39,999. See http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST2006-04-16.xls --Faustus37 21:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems that all of the United States metropolitan areas in the Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Idaho (Boise-Nampa, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Falls, Pocatello, and Lewiston) should be represented as "large cities", rather than getting crowded out by Boise suburbs.  I'm adding Lewiston back into the list of large cities.   -- RobLa 04:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small and Large Cities 

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is green?  I understand the idea is to try to match the green in the flag, but it doesn't exactly match. Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no objections, I will be bold and make the change.  Before reverting, please discuss here per WP:Deviations.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green
Template talk:Oklahoma

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: Should Piney Woods and the Osage Plains be listed on this template under the state's regions? Both are actually ecoregions that overlap articles about actual geographical areas of the state. For instance, Osage Plains covers most of central oklahoma, northeastern oklahoma, south central, and even some of the northwestern - all of these areas already have articles. Also, Piney Woods overlaps much of southeastern oklahoma. Since these are ecoregions instead of geographical or social regions, I will remove these from the template unless there are objections within the next couple days. Okiefromokla•talk 05:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't include the Piney Woods as a region in Oklahoma.  Locally I've never heard of the "piney woods" region of Oklahoma referred to as such, though Texas uses the term.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 05:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Regions

message: Arbuckle Country is the official designation for south central Oklahoma, as per the Oklahoma Department of Tourism.  Although Lake Country and Lake & Trail country are more well known, both were previous names for the region, at least officially.  While you could make a case for changing it to either of those, "south central Oklahoma" doesn't quite fit in the context of the other geologically-defined regions, e.g. "Ozarks", "Flint Hills", et. al. --Emersonbiggins85 03:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbuckle Country

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is green?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it looks like there are no objections.  I will make the change.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:08, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green
Template talk:Nebraska

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates
Template talk:New Mexico

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is tan?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not?  We already have tons of different colors of templates; there's no need to make every single state's template the same color.  Nyttend (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is WP:Deviations, which basically discourages overriding MediaWiki:Common.css using inline style statements.  Basically, by putting all the styling in MediaWiki:Common.css the visually impaired can override it using a personal Special:MyPage/skin.css.  I will invite further comments at one of the WP:MOS talk pages. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tan
Template talk:Mississippi

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is light blue?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:48, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no objections, I have gone ahead and made the bold change.  Please discuss here before reverting, if you disagree per WP:Deviations.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light blue
Template talk:Montana

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates
Talk:Jun Kazama

message: From where do you get "Kazama-Ryuu Kobujutsu"? In my booklet it says her fighting style in T2 is "Aiki-jiujitsu" (spelling?) and in tekken tag it says Kazama style classic martial arts. Kazama-Ryuu Kobujutsu? I've never heard of it.Aeneiden-Rex 07:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It means "Kazama-Style Traditional Martial Art" in Japanese. King Zeal 14:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jun's fighting style

message: I'm not sure who this is supposed to help. People who can read names can read them; people who can't, can't. Names are not shown with spaces at sites like Help:Japanese, or high-traffic articles like Junichiro Koizumi, Utada Hikaru, Hiroshige, Oda Nobunaga, or in the names of articles on the Japanese Wikipedia, etc. At any rate, I don't think that the evidence is in favor of simply saying "There's a space" and acting like the page has had a mistake. Dekimasu 05:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spaces in Japanese names
Template talk:Wyoming

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:08, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just converted this box, and all other state boxes to a standard template.  No information was lost in the transfer, and in fact a few problems were fixed (the old version used bullets, pipes, and spaces as delimiters, the new version sticks with just one choice: pipes).  --CapitalR 04:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is aqua?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it a particular color.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, since there are no objections, I will change the color to the default.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color
Template talk:Puerto Rico subdivisions

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: Is there a particular reason why this template is pink?  Wouldn't it be better to just go with the default used by  to avoid having a rainbow at the bottom of the page when this navbox is next to another one and per WP:ACCESSIBILITY?  Please let me know if there is a strong reason to have it pink.  I noticed this was attempted recently, but was reverted, so I thought I would be proactive and start a thread here to avoid an edit war. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pink 

message: Does anyone know if its possible to use this template (maybe via a switch) so that it appears "Closed" by default, meaning just the header bar across the screen rather that showing all the names of the municipalities, etc. I could not find clear instructions for this.  Thanks, Mercy11 (talk) 19:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed
Template talk:Tennessee

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. state templates

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 22:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates