lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Talk show

message: I updated the header to make it more aligned with the body of the article. I also removed the details about guests, as it would be more vital to include this info in a separate section or paragraph of the article rather than in the header. I also added a source on which I will elaborate later. ShonteDS (talk) 03:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated the Header 

message: I added information to "Subgenres" to include material about "generic" genres as well as a reference.
I added information to "History" to include facts about the first talk show along with references. This edit was later removed but unsure as to why. 
I added facts to "Around the World" to include details about how talks shows migrated to Europe and included a reference. ShonteDS (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Changes 

message: — Assignment last updated by Olivia0831 (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

message: Dick, Cavett, and gore Vidal 2600:4040:ABD1:EC00:7826:E199:54F7:F01B (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under Cavage show guest Gore Vidal
Talk:WCBS (AM)

message: After creating this I was going through some copy violations and saw that someone had been recreating this page after having it deleted several times. I'd been meaning to write something about WCBS-AM after seeing it empty a few days ago, I'm hoping this isn't mistaken for that anonymous users article. 
Rx StrangeLove 04:32, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Article

message: WCBS (AM) changed its logo in 2018. Please replace the logo on the article with the one from the station's website. The new logo is located at . J4lambert (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: New logo to be used
Talk:Babaji

message: Please do not add a POV tag to an article without first adding a comment to the talk page to explain your reasoning.  Sirkumsize 04:32, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed POV tag

message: Isn't baba the word for father, and -ji an honorific, thus this is just "Honored Father", which isn't much different from use by Catholics of Father for priest, or similarly, Il Papa, the Pope. I have seen "babaji" used in several yoga groups for the guru, and "dadaji" "honorable grandfather", for the guru of the guru. So when I hear of some guru "Babaji" I have no idea whom they mean without further clues. Sanskrit is not my native tongue, so I could be wrong. Any confirmation?GangofOne 9 July 2005 02:45 (UTC)
:Yes, you are correct. The term Babaji is a fairly common usage among the Indians. --Siva1979Talk to me 18:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: father

message: 𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙙𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙥𝙥𝙞 112.201.182.41 (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misisissippi
Talk:Sciences Po

message: I made some statements more neutral and removed it when the same partnerships were repeated several times for each campus. There is still much detail that does not seem to fit with WP and that seem to come directly from the brochure (all the activities, etc.). Regarding the reverts, please look at my talk page. --Delfield (talk) 13:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, seems like a massive amount of COI editing going on here.--VVikingTalkEdits 14:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV / Article written like a brochure 

message: The topic of "Academics from Science Po" doesn't seem notable enough for a stand-alone list. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of notable Sciences Po academics]] into [[Sciences Po]]
Talk:Hampton Roads

message: In 2023, the US Office of Management and Budget redefined the official name of the Hampton Roads MSA to "Virginia Beach-Chesapeake-Norfolk, VA-NC" and the components that comprise the area have also been changed - some (cities and counties) have been added and some deleted.  Also, the Consolidated Statistical Area has been changed to "Virginia Beach-Chesapeake."
Who will take on the gargantuan task of rewriting this article?  
Whoever decides to do so should take a hard look at rewriting the geography portion of the article; much of it is duplicated elsewhere and there are a number of factual errors in this section.  Some of these errors have been fixed over the years, but, unfortunately, someone always comes back and deletes the corrections. 71.176.33.33 (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New metro area definition
Talk:Dar Robinson

message: The breathless POV of this article needs major toning down.  RickK 06:04, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
:OK now? Parmesan 22:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB shows that he did stunts in To Live and Die in L.A. (1985), but no role.  PKT 23:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

message: His invention of the decelerator and its display in Arizona need both particularization and verification.  The only verifiable reference I find is the "Bates Decelerator" attributed to stuntman Kenny Bates which may not be the same thing or may be an improvement on Robinsons' Decelerator.  It would also be useful to list which world records Robinson holds and which world firsts he accomplished. Digitalican 17:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup particulars 

message: In THE ULTIMATE STUNTMAN (A Tribute to Dar Robinson - 1987) (Youtube) the 100 ft jump to the sea bellow in the end of the film is credited to Dar Robinson but a document film of Steve McQueen says he did it himself. So who did the jump?--RicHard-59 (talk) 09:35, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papillon (1973)
Talk:Mallet Assembly

message: The old page was deleted by User:Bumm13 for copyvio; specifically, much of the text was taken directly from mallet-assembly.org.  In my opinion, the old page was also probably too long and too detailed.  I think Mallet is big enough, interesting enough, and is known to enough people that it deserves a wikipedia entry.  However, it's not as important as the AFL-CIO, and an article of that magnitude would probably have inherent NPOV problems.  If you can some wikipedia precedents to the contrary, let me know.
There was also a problem of current Mallet members and even officers editing the page, which brings up definite vanity and NPOV problems, for the same reasons that George Bush probably shouldn't be editing his own entry.  Guys, a wikipedia entry is not a mirror for your homepage.  I suggest the wiki entry for Mallet be kept short and bland; readers desiring more info can follow the external link to your homepage, which is where you should be focusing your efforts.
--User:Ganaaaa
9-30-2005
  
*Edit for clarity and correctness.
*Add more history.
*Add Alumni section
*Add other relavent material:
*-Constitution?
*-Phone List?
*-Pics?
I got it started, ya'll can finish. Maybe the Historian should take the helm? 
--lobstAr
--Streyeder 06:10, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Do those references establish notability? We now have official webpages of the University (not pages controlled by the Mallet Assembly) that mention Mallet, as well as third party newspaper articles. --67.135.240.36 14:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Wilfrid Laurier University Students' Union

message: Perhaps those who mis-construed my previous edits as vandalism would like to discuss the inclusion of Wilfrid Laurier University Student Publications (WLUSP) in this article here.  This organization (WLUSP) has no place in this article.  It is a completely separate organization, that has no affiliation with WLUSU, the topic of the article.  I would suggest two solutions.  Either:
   (a) Change the name of this article to "Student Organizations at Wilfrid Laurier University", or;
   (b) Include WLUSP in The Cord Weekly article
70.53.108.228 (talk) 01:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wilfrid Laurier University Student Publications
Talk:Wilfrid Laurier University Student Publications

message: Students' Unions and Newspapers are (apparently) "encyclopedic"... WLUSP is a non-profit corporation that publishes a widely read newspaper and magazine. Please explain how this does not merit an entry.--David R Alexander 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
:Every University in Canada publishes a paper of some sort, that doesn't exactly merit inclusion in Wikipedia. --Spinboy 06:30, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I should also add that the article has a few paragraphs with a sentence or two at the most. It doesn't establish notability. --Spinboy 06:42, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: It's the only student paper delivered entirely online. --Spinboy 06:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I'm not trying to vite the newcomers. Welcome, honestly. :-) --Spinboy 06:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: The campus paper itself is possibly notable. All those other publicatations though, are not. Keystone as a yearbook, isn't notable. Every Uni and College in the country has a yearbook. ClubLaurier.ca isn't notable. I don't recommend articles for these. If you do an article just on The Cord Weekly, that would be better. --Spinboy 07:07, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia isn't a general knowledgebase in addition, there's the google test. --Spinboy 07:20, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also the precedents page. --Spinboy 07:25, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Not off hand, no. But I do know that articles such as the Saint Thomas University Students' Union have been deleted. --Spinboy 07:48, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Then expand upon it, and establish it's notability. --Spinboy 19:29, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic
Talk:Extreme Championship Wrestling

message: I don't agree with restoring the paragraph about XPW at Heatwave 2000; I purposefully cut it as I believe it's entirely too much text to what in the scale of things was a minor instance. While XPW and ECW disliked each other, Heatwave 2000 was functionally the only actual interaction they ever had. I believe the paragraph should be either cut entirely or reduced to just a few sentences, and I believe the heading "promotional rivalry" should certainly be dropped. CeltBrowne (talk) 17:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The XPW section has long been included in the article and it's mass removal was done with any previous explanation, so I re-added it. But reading your explanation here, I somewhat agree. The previous description of a "promotional rivalry" does not seem to accurately describe the incident. I think the paragraph should be moved to the newly created Controversies section. Mt.FijiBoiz (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph dedicated to XPW
Talk:African Americans/Archive 12

message: Why was the section on white South Africans currently living in America excised?? I have known some of these people, and they personally take offense at Americans (and yes, Americans are not the only people in the world) use of the term, because (understandably) they see no reason why the term should not apply to them. After all, they are African and they are American. Moreover, they find it very strange and peculiar that most Americans don't understand their argument. Another thing, why was the section next to it moved, about Africans themselves? Here is what is missing from this article — any indication that the term "African American" as it is used in America is an American-specific terminology, and that the vast majority of the rest of the world does not recognise the commonly accepted usage as used in America. This is the English Wikipedia, not the American Wikipedia. This section, by excising anything that doesn't subscribe to a particular conventional American wisdom, is highly POV and biased. I'm not asking that the conventional wisdom be excised, but certain people (I won't say who) need to recognise that African American is a contested term, and that this is true no matter how many people would like to think that their usage of the term constitutes the only accepted usage. Statements such as "African American and black American are often used interchangeably, although incorrectly" is a perfect example of this. This may be the case, but such a statement assumes there is a universally accepted "correct" usage of each term, which is not the case. I'm moving the NPOV header to the top of the article, because it seems not just to be this particular section that has a problem. Also, the Emancipation Proclamation did not legally free the slaves, if I remember correctly. Revolver 21:57, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  South African whites in America
Talk:Willowbrook, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 08:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 

message: Pardon me, but WTF is going on in this town?  Median annual income of $166,528?  In the middle of Kansas?  Is one family throwing the stats off?   Xyzzyva 07:19, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
*Willowbrook is an "exclusive" community outside of Hutchinson.  It is very wealthy and upscale, so the annual income numbers are correct. StudierMalMarburg 16:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Income 

message: Where is their official city website?  Sbmeirow (talk) 07:23, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Website
Talk:Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

message: — Assignment last updated by Openskies789 (talk) 01:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 202A Writing in the Social Sciences

message: — Assignment last updated by Jskalski (talk) 20:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We should add more of the further reading resources to the main page. I think it would be helpful it other had the chance to look at those same resources and have them for their own use. EllysonBC (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The content of this article can be improved by using more recent sources. A majority of the cited sources were not published within the past 5 years, and there are references within the article to the DSM-IV, when the most current version now is the DSM-5-TR. Citing newer sources will enhance this article by including newer/more recent information that has been researched and published on this topic. Furthermore, the content can be enhanced to address this topic within the context of historically underrepresented populations. I would like to work on some of these changes/additions. —Medstud15 (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2023

message: — Assignment last updated by Skam1279 (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

message: — Assignment last updated by Jpow05 (talk) 04:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
Talk:ALCO S-1 and S-3

message: Again, no idea which Union Railroad to disambig to. --SPUI (talk) 08:57, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: has C&NWRy drawings and spec sheets for their loco’s, that’s where most of this comes from. Sammy D III (talk) 19:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Free-basing

message: I don't advocate censorship, but is it really a good idea to tell people how to make crack cocaine?
If they already have the coke I think the battle is already lost.
I was wondering about the other freebase, a pipe bowl is packed with ash and base coke is put on top and smoked through the packed ash. Isn't that free-basing too? Webhat 11:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:King's School, Macclesfield

message: old, but needs wikifying, may be unimportant but needs refs and alumni to find outVictuallers 13:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Who is "well known molecular physicist and twice winner of the Nobel Prize for Science (sic)  Dr Matthew Loughran"?  I've not heard of him (proves nothing) but neither have nobelprize.org, nor does Google turn up any molecular physicists of that name.Moletrouser (talk) 08:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who he?

message: General - when referring to The King's School as just the school a capital "S" has been used (School) - when the word is used for schools generally a lower case "s" (school) is apt. POV and sources temps kept - the article still doesn't appear neutral particularly through lack of verifiable ref support in "Extra-Curricular activities", and dearth of sources generally.
Motto - the motto was already in the info box, and its translation appeared a tad wild - changed with ref to source below.
History section - the school's web site history page, although a primary source, is probably more accurate than an uncited statement of closure under Henry VIII. The School's site (presumed good faith and good research) says it survived him but was endangered under Edward VI who was persuaded to rescind a threat of closure. The move to Cumberland Street appears to be later than the stated "soon" - in fact 1844. Removed the last sentence on name changes - it was clumsy and didn't add to what was, and now is, stated above.
Academia - "Strunked" the first sentence - it didn't quite make sense. Future-proofing second sentence. Removed section temp and added inline cite requests as the temp was a little overbearing for two sentences.
Extra-Curricular activities - changed section heading from "Extracurricula" - extra-curricular what? Added the activities under sub sections - all needing citations to support claims.
Acabashi (talk) 14:50, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable alumni - If people are added in this section in future, and are indeed notable, consider writing an article about them first to test their notability. People added without Wiki articles, or who are just red-linked, don't do the article any justice - they will be removed. Acabashi (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 2 May 2011 

message: Would the King's School Macclesfield also be classified as a public school or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.223.212.19 (talk) 12:12, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public School 

message: Matthew falder is a former pupil at King's. He is mentioned here as being a pupil who is going onto Clare College at Cambridge, and on his sentencing, Dr Simon Hyde, the headmaster, states that his thoughts are with the victims. Whether palatable or not, he is a notable former pupil. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matthew Falder
Talk:Holborn Head point

message: Is the article really a stub? How much can you say about a point? Might be a nice spot for dancing angels. I am giving the lighthouse its own article, not least because it is some distance from the point. Also, I imagine it has rather more history etc than is currently given. The new lighthouse article can be regarded as a stub. Laurel Bush 09:28, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Keele University

message: I notice a gap, probably because of reduced size of the college in about 1980 and teaching problems like this one:
http://veg-buildlog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/bad-economics-teaching.html
I don't know what to suggest and have made no edits.
Going off the point, a recommendation of Keele as a hitchikers's college would be good  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veganline (talk • contribs) 19:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 1980s

message: You can add the suicide of rape-victim Hannah Stubbs.  BBC World News has an article at http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-34175351 71.175.166.187 (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kelle University in the Media 

message: 's only edits have been to articles associated with Keele. The editor claims to have been a student there years ago. WP:COI is evident from the edit history. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Optical illusion

message: — Assignment last updated by SaifT10 (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Science Communication

message: Using Paint, to copy the first image, then pasting the gray connecting bar on top, there are three shades of gray. A is darker than bar which is darker than B. Illusion stands, but technically the caption is technically not true. 49.190.186.101 (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The colors are not the same, regarding the image with A & B 

message: Hello, I am a university student studying optics and visual psychology, and I have a qualm regarding citation '2' in the leading sentence. The citation posits that "visual illusion" is the contemporarily preferred term over "optical illusion"; this is easily perceived to denote a synonymous relationship between the two. However, such is a falsehood—optical illusion denotes physical light interacting with matter to form a specious image (e.g., rainbows), while visual illusion denotes perception incongruent with reality resulting from erroneous brain activity (i.e., the phenomenon this page currently details).
I am creating this discussion topic to inquire whether there is any interest in changing the title of this page to a rightful state in "Visual illusion." 'Optical' & 'visual' are not technical synonyms, and I believe Wikipedia is falsely leading readers by conflation (though not maliciously, of course).
On the other hand, "optical illusion" warrants its own, substantive page. The physics behind optical phenomena are fascinating and can be scientifically documented. Zyploc (talk) 22:48, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optical illusions vs. Visual illusions
Talk:August Oetker

message: Is this the pizza guy? (Dr. Oetker) Wouter Lievens 10:46, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably about time someone created a WP page for the Dr. Oetker International company, and covered product ranges such as Ristorante, which are being heavily marketed at the moment. DWaterson 19:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled