lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ibirapuera Park

message: I vote to change the name of this article to Ibirapuera Park, to stay with the usual article names of foreign places. I think that if the name of a place is difficult to translate, and doesn't really make sense in English, such as Largo da Batata, which sounds really awkward in English calling it Potato Square, it should be kept the same, but considering this is the English Wikipedia, it should be Ibirapuera Park.
This isn't a high traffic page, so if I don't get a response within a while, I'm changing the page without a vote.
Peace
Charlesblack 13:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: Page Moved Charlesblack 17:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result

message: Could someone please clarify (in the article, of course) just where in the city this park is located? Thanks -- Writtenonsand (talk) 19:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where exactly?

message: Moving this text here from the Features section. It is probably a hoax."The Villa de Osos Bacalao ("Wondrous Museum"), generally accepted as the most popular building ever, the Villa is shaped like a spherical horse, and is famous for baffling architects throughout history."No Google hits for 'Villa de Osos Bacalao' or 'Villa de Ossos Bacalao' that are not clones of this article. Portuguese Wikipedia article http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parque_Ibirapuera apparently does not mention this building.Please give a good cite for this info if it is returned to the main article. -- 201.37.224.210 (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Villa de Osos Bacalao": Likely hoax
Talk:Allograft

message: *Cleanup tag moved to article page* Washburnmav (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article is a bit off in how it explains auto- and isografts. Isografts can still be rejected even if the donor and recipient have the exact same genome. Due to peptides bound to graft MHC. But, as it's not the article's primary focus, i'm not sure whether I should change this. A quandry for the older and wiser and less lazy.
Andykinosis (talk) 05:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto/isograft success 

message: Those allografts that happen all the time during pregnancy, i.e. the whole conceptus, isn't rejected. Why? --Ayacop (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fetal allografts 

message: This article deal with exactly the same subject as Allotransplantation. Everything could be put in Allotransplantation to be consistent with e.g. Autotransplantation and Xenotransplantation. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for this separate when there's [[Allotransplantation]] 
Talk:Santa Clara, Cuba

message: "Parque Vidal is probabaly one of the most traditional places in Cuba."  What could this mean?  I've been to Parque Vidal several times, and it's nice but is it really so different from other Cuban city squares?  If so, is there any reference from these unusual customs? — MikeG (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some parts of the article have been long modified so, unfortunately I can not be assure how did the sentence actually was, but the expression "..most traditional places in Cuba" was textually taken from a book, maybe I should have included the reference when I wrote that part. Sorry for that. But here is the catch, in comments coming from both of you lead to think the difference might be geographically (or architecturally) and of course you both are right that it's not the case, Vidal Park lookls like any other park in Cuba, it was made following Spanish standards. The difference was in the hinterland's customs held on it since its creation, that was what made it different form others. I believe there is some extra info about it in the Parks own page.--Lezumbalaberenjena (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for not been the one taking out information. I can assure you that some traditional customs are still alive; The city's Philharmonic Band stills performs once a week(Thursday's night), and also still alive is one of it's oldest traditions which is a "Danzon" day (Cuba's national dance), I have a last year picture of elders in the park dancing to the beat of Danson. Of course the division of sexes long disappear, so of course and not mention in the article for obvious reasons, Vidal had centuries ago spots for Black and White people.--Lezumbalaberenjena (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Like you I also believe he was no better that a common murderer, and actually I was the one that included the information of Marta Abreu, the true benefactor, because it was mention nowhere. But unfortunately history can not be rewritten and changed at will and it doesn't matter how much blood he had in his hands he was there (again unfortunately) and it's part of the local history. I'd like to see less of him written everyplace, I would definitely die happier the day Marta's historic significance it's restored but I will not be the one removing others information. By the way Machado has his own (very large) entry, and I guess so is Weyler.--Lezumbalaberenjena (talk) 20:56, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Traditional" places
Talk:Francisco Javier Clavijero

message: I agree; they clearly refer to the same man and both contain good information. Perhaps Francisco Saverio Clavigero is a latinized form of his name. However it is much less common (as per Google). The articles should be merged under Francisco Javier Clavijero, which is also the spelling on the title page of his book. --Rbraunwa 14:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:CJ Group

message: I could not find a reliable citation (other than CJ's own page) saying that CJ owns this brand, and that directly contradicts all other information about Cold Stone. --184.23.210.148 (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold Stone?
Talk:Fatih Solak

message: == POV tag ==
This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article included some details about people associated with him and his alleged popularity. There still are way too many personal judgements and opinions (both so.'s opinions about Fatih Solak and Solak's alleged opinions about so. else) rather than facts, but I won't re-add the template because the most severe problems have been fixed (i.e., deleted). --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article included some details about people associated with him and his alleged popularity. There still are way too many personal judgements and opinions (both so.'s opinions about Fatih Solak and Solak's alleged opinions about so. else) rather than facts, but I won't re-add the template because the most severe problems have been fixed (i.e., deleted). --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 15:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:Bramber Castle

message: This section by Neb503 14:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not certain what the sources for this are, but it sounds almost Victorian in language, and I would advise readers to research the reign of John from a variety of sources before judging him.
Onto the castle,  Whilst I have not been able to find any reliable dating of the gate house keep, to date this before c.12 would make it one of, if not the oldest stone tower keep in this style in England (meaning not in Bishop Gundulf's style of Colchester or London).
It should be made clear that the Motte itself, the hill in the centre of the site is man-made but may predate the conquest (Edward the Confessor invited many Norman's to England, many of whom may have built castles), it is the larger hill that the walls stand on which is natural, although it would not be beyond the wit of Norman engineering to improve it.
Again, a stone curtain wall would be unusual in c.11, although not unheard of, as the first castles were thrown up in a matter of days or weeks after Hastings to 'nail the countryside'  Walls of this thickness would have taken some time to put up.  Also worthy of note is that whilst Bramber may be described as a double bailey castle (the bailey being the area within the walls), nothing separates the two baileys, as say at Arundel., so arguably this is a very different design with a single bailey with Motte in the middle.
Finally I believe Bramber never stood on the coast,but that he course of the Adur has changed, and that whilst great trading ships came to the port, once the river silted up this became impossible and the town died.
Phil Reid (talk) 07:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin Hood Syndrome 

message: I recently uploaded some 17th century engravings of Bramber Castle by Wenceslas Hollar, shown below. Feel free to use or not use - I placed the last one in the page for now. Dcoetzee 11:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images 

message: http://www.mspong.org/picturesque/bramber_castle.html
remeber to check.Genisock2 (talk) 04:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Archive.org says it was. this on the other hand appears to have copied from us.©Geni 00:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio?
Talk:Stemming

message: A few other points, if someone has the time to edit:
1) There appears to be no mention of 'suffix substitution', this is common in most stemmers that also do suffix stripping, for example in English substitute -ies for -y (as in lady and ladies); the method can be extended to substitute irregular verbs such as ran for run etc. 
:I added this today if you want to review (Josh Froelich)
2) The list of languages is a bit pointless, many commercial products have stemming for dozens of languages e.g. Verity, dtSearch.
:Agree but it was there in the 1 paragraph article that used to exist so I left it in there
3) Google as a commercial example is rather poor I think, many other commercial companies have been using stemming techniques for decades. Ray3055 20:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree but it was there in the original article so I left it in there. There is a bit of a Google fanaticism unfortunately and there is some truth to the fact that many normal non-technical people approach this concept via this Google vehicle of understanding.
"On the other hand, stemmers for true isolating languages such as Vietnamese can be even simpler than those for English." Removed this, Vietnamese has no verb inflection, and no noun declension - hence stemming does not apply.
The link to the Vietnamese wikipedia article is confusing it uses the term "..is an analytic (or isolating) language" implying the terms mean the same - but see the two separate articles.Ray3055 12:03, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other points

message: I changed the number "one" to "two" under "Hybrid approaches".  This is my first edit in Wikipedia ever.  I welcome any comments that may help me be a better editor.  Lon of Oakdale (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hybrid Approaches

message: This article as it stands is absolute crap.  Large parts are waffling opinion and each section could be summarised in one or two sentences without losing any content, if indeed the content is any use (see the lack of citations, personal opinions, etc.)  Judgements about algorithm efficiency are a bit arbitrary (e.g. algorithmic approach faster than lookup?!?)  The assertion that using stochastic algorithms makes it harder to distribute software is just arrant nonsense.
Please can someone with a linguistics and computer science background clean this up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.5.58 (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality

message: This should not redirect. This should be the article. User:Jfroelich
:Agree, this is not the same process. Lemmatization produces grammatically correct word forms, but stemming just removes a series of suffixes/prefixes and/or endings. The result is not necessarily a word at all. Stemming is done through a grammar-unaware algorithm. As a result, totally different words can have the same stemmed version. It would be totally insane to merge two articles.User:Itman  —Preceding undated comment added 17:35, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Red Steagall

message: This article reads like a Red Steagall PR piece. It has one in-line citation. Steagall already has a website. This deserves a meataxe. Tapered (talk) 23:54, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: PR Piece
Talk:Golubački grad

message: I've noticed that there is another article at Golubac fortress that I suspect should really be a redirect to this one. Anyone good with managing mergers want to take a look at this? jugander (t) 14:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed this as well, but I'm not sure whether it should be merged here, since this is the first page, or to Golubac fortress. I believe Golubački grad is the Serbian Latin name, which means it should be in parentheses after the English name on the other page instead. However, this page is the one that came first, so... Opinions? -Bbik 00:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion ongoing at Talk:Golubac fortress. jugander (t) 09:22, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate?
Talk:Indicator species

message: Why is this section even in here at all: "Indicator Species for Ancient Woodland in England"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.244.220 (talk) 05:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. The section should be moved to another article (I'm not sure where), or deleted. Moreau1 (talk) 21:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Indicator Species for Ancient Woodland in England

message: It doesn't take a genius to figure out that chemicals can be the biggest example of bioindicators.
I just added the Gray Jay to the :Category:Indicator species of North America.  They are probably being impacted by warming in:  fall, winter, spring temperatures-(Global warming).
If you want to spend some time on wikipedia, then develop the articles first.  Both articles, Indicator species, and Bioindicators are very under-developed, or have errors ( ! ). I just adjusted the Paragraph information to the preview for: :Category:Indicator species of North America...   So, go develop the articles, then you will find that "indicator species" of various Regions of the world is just a subset, referred to in: Bioindicators.  ..from the "Sonoran Desert"--Mmcannis 14:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bioindicators

message: A repeat, Again..  the biggest bio-indicators are: C h e m i c a l s.... See for example: Chesapeake Bay, and its bio-indicator pollutants.
From the desert of AZ-..I vote: No Merge.  Create 2- Articles. ....-Mmcannis 19:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: Should Indicator_plant be merged with this page? - 2601:E:1802:E600:BC8C:7D8:C8CF:3AEF (talk) 19:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Jing Junhong

message: hasn't she since retired from semi-pro table tennis?Chensiyuan 14:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Debutante ball

message: After reading the article on the St. Cecilia Society, I feel it is important to mention the extremely conservative, and in this case racist, nature of some societies. How representative are they? I really know nothing about all this, and feel that the article needs to clarify if these balls are often connected to such racist institutions, and if not, clarify the exceptions. It's one thing to operate on the basis on class snobbery, it's another to be outright racist. Can someone who knows more explain this in the article? Othewise if I tried to write it, I feel I might derail into a POV rant pretty quick. jugander (t) 15:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Racism is not directly relevant to Cotillion; it might with as much relevance be inserted at Daughters of the American Revolution, etc etc. --Wetman (talk) 22:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Racism?

message: The external links need to be made into references, moved to the External links section, or removed per WP:EL and WP:SPAM.  The list needs inclusion criteria per WP:LIST.  Until we can come up with some other criteria, the entries should at least have their own Wiki article. --Ronz (talk) 16:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: On the disambiguation page, this page is described as "a formal presentation of young ladies, debutantes, to polite society." but in the article itself, this aspect is never mentioned.
72.11.236.10 (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What About Presenting Young Girls to Society?

message: I have copied the first few paragraphs from the "History" section here over to Cotillion_(dance), which is in sad need of better content. I'm not sure why this article is the landing place for "Cotillion" instead of a disambiguation page, unless it was that there was no previous article on the dance form. The first paragraphs here might wish to be revised or cut as a result.
Feyandstrange (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dance form versus debutante ball

message: A little while ago, my ballet teacher told us we were doing a ballet called Cotillion, and that we were village girls. I was a little doubtful at first, but now I'm excited!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.151.21 (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cotillion
Talk:Extemporaneous preaching

message: Why Pentecostal/Charismatic?  Nothing in the article justifies that category. Mdotley 15:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: seems to have some information beyond a dictionary entry, and could surely be expanded. DGG (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case I'd recommend a merge into Preach. Thoughts? VigilancePrime (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't object.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdotley (talk • contribs) 23:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: deprodded

message: Impromptu preaching seems a natural merge here - in fact, I would say that they are simply synonyms.  Objections? Pastordavid (talk) 15:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Mack Gordon

message: It is no longer possible to comment on ratings due to a backlog. Please put any comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 16:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Biography Rating
Talk:Herbert Read

message: Deleted misleading un-sourced reference to Stirner in opening para. Why? Woodcock, for example, states: 'Thus Max Stirner's egoism is rejected by Read in favour of the anarchist-communism of Kropotkin, or at least of his own adaptation of that doctrine.' (Herbert Read: The Stream and the Source, London: Faber & Faber, 1972, p. 223.) Wingspeed (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read & Stirner 

message: I don't think the information recently appended concerning Frank McEwen really tells us anything substantial about Herbert Read.  I would suggest this remark should be deleted.  --Antisyzygy 15:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seeing as Read is known as an art critic and historian, there is not enough in this article about art.    Pelarmian (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough about art 
Talk:Bežigrad Grammar School

message: To administration:
I move for immediate lock of editing by unregistered parties due to repeated defacements of the article. The article is a stub, but that isn't a "cardè blanchè" to fill it up with crap. Clicking "History" reveals a history of personal vendettas, blatant advertisement and complete non-sense, none of which belong on Wikipedia. --193.77.176.173 15:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Maximilien Luce

message: Jean Maitron's Histoire du mouvement anarchiste (tome I, Tel Gallimard, p.256) states that only Ortiz, Chericotti and Bertanni were given sentences during the Trial of the thirty, and all others acquitted. Tazmaniacs (talk) 02:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The article says Luce attended "l'Ecole communale". As this simply means a local school of the commune, I'm wondering if it's not a proper noun, in which case it should be translated to "a local school of the commune". However, it could be correct as written if that is the proper name of the school, although I'd still expect it to be more specific, with a locale name attached. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 11:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The source says "Maximilien enrolls in l'Ecole communale on the Chaussée du Maine", so that could be added. Of course, the ordinary school he attended at age six certainly isn't important, so the whole sentence could be removed. Whatever you want to do. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed: not a proper noun. Cheers, — Racconish Tk   21:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification on schooling please 
Talk:Statistical unit

message: There are examples, but how about a clear example of a unit?  It mentions opinion polling: is each individual polled a "unit"?  In medical testing, is each patient a "unit"? 71.127.0.211 15:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Confused 

message: Statistical unit and Unit (statistics) seem to be talking about the same thing, so it would make sense to merge them. But under which title? Qwfp (talk) 17:15, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the "unit (statistics)" article today, but now that I became aware of this article I decided to merge under this title immediately.  Skbkekas (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Konrad Mutian

message: The article says (but the red lk was wikified by me)
:he resigned it (1503) for a small salary as canonicus in Gotha.
Consulting English Wiktionary, German Wiktionary, a collegiate dictionary, and the Google result 
: 784 of about 101,000 for "canonicus" -Indian -camp -sachem -uss -Narragansett 
suggest that "canonicus" is a Latin word. Canon (priest) implies that it is. Anyone got a better idea than changing my lk to canon, & creating canonicus (office) as a redirect to Canon (priest) for the sake of future similar cases?--Jerzy•t 15:47 & 15:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled