Talk:CASA de Maryland/Archive 1

message: I deleted:
"Most of the controversy centers around allegations that the day-labor centers administrated by the group are primarily used by illegal aliens, who may not legally be employed in any capacity in the US and are using free social services paid for by the US taxpayer, and could potentially be taking jobs from US citizens and legal residents.
The source cited does not actually contain the allegations stated in this article.
Justin (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Improperly sourced allegations

message: :Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Thanks. --Evb-wiki 00:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: I could use some help, if it's not too much to ask, with getting this page into the "standard format", with a summary in the first few paragraphs, the "blue box" directing to specific sections within the article, and some advice or pointers on how to do footnoting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thardman22 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's improving. It still needs cleaning up and has formatting issues. Please see Wikipedia's manual on style and citation forms. Notability might be there. I'm still not sure, as the sources are not always on point. --Evb-wiki 01:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I could use some help

message: I believe the revert of several (5) careful edits were not, as characterized by the editor who reverted them "vandalism, slanted journalism supporting political viewpoint, weasel words"  Wholesale reversion was not warranted.  Scarykitty (talk) 02:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your response.  I have reverted to the pre-revert edition and addressed your concerns.  (for example removing unsourced characterization of HSM as anti-immgirant, and changing reference from AG to "government" as is supported by the Washington Post article.  Please take up future concerns on this page or make selective edits rather than reverting many edits to a version you prefer.
Reference to immigrants moving from Virginia to Maryland does not belong in an article about CASA of Maryland unless there is a reliable published source which links the two concepts.  At present there is none, so I did not re-include that segment.  I could find no reference to a CASA Virginia site and I do not believe there is one.  If you want to start an article on Immigrant migration from Virginia to Maryland, go right ahead.  CASA referring people to a particular attorney (even if sourced by a reliable published source, which it is not) still does not establish a link between people moving from Virginia to Maryland and this organization.  
Regarding REAL ID.  I think the section is correct as stands, but you are of course welcome to edit it to reflect current status.  Scarykitty (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: I just did a reorg of the article. i dropped this section mainly because it was so POV. I don't think it is well cited and advance a strong bias. Before we add it back in, i think we should discuss it here. --evrik (talk) 02:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: User 'evrik' is "Retired" - The account is abandoned and presumably this was a mere vandalism and defacement. I am reverting to the last version before his vandalism. Thardman22 (talk) 23:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Section

message: First, I would say that a cite to a government website that states directly that lobbying governments in the US for a foreign government falls under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, "FARA". See links above, and also within Wikipedia. 
Secondly, this is merely the latest installment of people wiping information from wikipedia which is potentially inconvenient to CASA, its supporters, and the people it supports. I'm just trying to get all of the information out and back it with good solid cites. 
Now I am going to go dig up the cites for the CITGO controversy and re-add them, if they got deleted. Thardman22 (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism and Politically Motivated Revisionism Reverted

message: I think it's time to start this debate again. Thardman22 (talk) 22:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Which debate?   Will Beback  talk   23:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010

message: I completed a stem-to-stern copyedit of this page.  In so doing, I noticed pervasive POV-pushing and misquoting throughout the article.  I have updated the article to correctly reflect what is stated in the linked references.  I have also removed references to questionable sources, such as Michelle Malkin's opinion blog, as they violate Wikipedia policy—most especially WP:NPOV. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit

message: The name of this organization, as shown in their logo, their website, and every media they've created, is Casa DE Maryland, NOT Casa OF Maryland. I don't know how to propose changing it to its appropriate name, could someone help? Shelbylv (talk) 20:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --evrik (talk) 20:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name