lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ringgold high school marching band

message: I'm working on the article. There's a lot more to come... with over 50 years of history. I can understand the fact that it needs improvement. But, please don't say that's it's a bunch of kids who play instruments with no claim to fame. That's just a little rude, don't you think?
*My apologies for coming off as a little over the top. However, the way I see it, is that unless you or other contributors can provide evidence that says "We are different and greater to all other high school marching bands", I don't like your chances of this article remaining. Saberwyn - 20:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Surinamese guilder

message: To save cost of manufacturing, coins of less than 5 gulden (all denominated in cent) were made legal for their face value in the new currency. Thus, these coins increased their purchasing power by 1000 fold overnight.
isn't this 10 fold as guldens were denominated in cents? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markizs (talk • contribs) 11:15, 21 February 2007
:1 gulden = 100 old cent, 1 dollar = 1000 gulden = 100 new cent. So 1 new cent = 1000 old cent. If a coin that used to represent the amount of 10 old cent becomes 10 new cent overnight, its value increased by 1000 fold. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 13:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  coins and changeover
Talk:Ground speed

message: I Changed "over the ground" to "relative to the ground". This makes it obvious that it is the speed of the airplane that is measured against the ground, as opposed to it possibly meaning that the airplane itself is over the ground at the time you measure its speed.
212.138.64.171 16:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Ground speed is not an airspeed; it is a vehicle's speed over the ground rather than through the air (a medium which can itself be moving). They're totally different concepts, and it wouldn't make any sense at all to merge them. ericg ✈ 04:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger proposal 

message: I came to this page from a link on the Knots page and was surprised to find that this page only references aircraft. What about boats? Ground speed relates to vessels also because speed on water is not the same as on land. There are factors to take in to consideration such as the speed of the fluid which the vessel is in, wind speed etc. That's really just what I've learnt from the 'Knots' page so if anyone knows anymore about the aquatic side of ground speed, it would be helpful to be included in this page. Or is there another name for the aquatic version of ground speed? - Frank --202.138.10.189 (talk) 09:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about vessels? 

message: To measure ground speed for (atmospheric bound) aircrafts one can take the earth (geoid) surface as the fixed bases, where the velocity (vector) v=0. As aircrafts do not fly (much) higher than 10 km, which gives a position about 1/600 part higher then the radius (6200 km) of earth. This is even more likely valid for u-boats.
ISS "flies" in a Low Earth Orbit of 400 km above ground. This height is a relevant fraction, about 6 % of earth radius. When now the article about ISS speaks about ground speed this could mean 
(a) the speed at flight height relative to an imaginary calm atmosphere there up. This atmosphere rotates with the earth surface.
(b) the speed of of the projection line from the flying object the the center of earth where it hits the (rotating) earth surface.
(c) the speed of (a) but assumed the earth would not rotate
(d) the speed of (b) again assuming a non-rotating earth. 
For GPS- or survey-satellites or intercontinental rockets the geographical position is relevant, but the rotation of earth (1/day around the N-S-axis) does (after the start and the few minutes of ascend through the lower - let us say 30 km - atmosphere) not interfere with the orbit or flight path of the object. So it seems it needs further definition "which groundspeed" one looks at particularly. --Helium4 (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary purpose of ground speed is to be able to determine the time taken to pass two points on the Earth's surface, so I think your option (b) is the relevant one in the case of an object in orbit. Dolphin (t) 21:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  basis is at ground or flight level? earth rotates?
Talk:Bob Roop

message: I see this page was listed for speedy deletion. But a lot of a articles links to it, and it was listed on Wikipedia:Most wanted articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anthony Ivanoff (talk • contribs) 16:49, 13 December 2005.
Which is how I arrived here. Well, I'll write the article offline and load it after its fairly well along. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  About speedy deletion 

message: His amateur championships and accomplishments wouldn't be bad. You can look at Kurt Angle's for an example. Also the text mentions that he used a shoulderbreaker as his finishing move; that could be added to a Finishing and signature moves -section. The style is shown in the pending tasks box on the top of this page.
↪Lakes 11:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add that, but he took State his senior year in high school, then although he had a decent record in college, his only title win was the NAAU light-heavyweight. I'm thinking a list of one (or two if I add the high school win) is a little short to put in a bulleted list. OTOH, I did that in the finishing move, to match style for other wrestlers, per your suggestion (thanks!). KillerChihuahua?!? 12:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved discussion

message: Bob is listed as being 58 in the Orlando Sentinel article from 2000 that is linked in notes. His date of birth is given as 1943 on IMDB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HappHazzard (talk • contribs) 03:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth/Age
Talk:CD single

message: I would like to say that you have missed out their first album from the chronology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.133.134 (talk • contribs) 
I can find no reference on the 'net for "Brothers in Arms" being the first CD single. - Foetusized (talk) 14:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may have released on vinyl in 1982, but 3-inch CD singles were not introduced until 1988, so this wasn't released on 3" CD in 1982. -- Foetusized (talk) 23:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Is this text true for the UK as well as the USA? 
"Due to pressure from record labels, singles charts became song charts, allowing album cuts to chart based only on airplay, without a single ever being released."
I remember the new rules for what could be classed as a "Single" coming in (no more than 3 tracks etc.) but as far as I remember it continued to be the "Singles" chart until a couple of years ago when Download sales were added. 
86.164.183.227 (talk) 19:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Song Charts'?  

message: As per Amakuru's suggestion above, and the Technology section as well as technical specification section in the Mini CD single article seems to suit the Mini CD article better. C933103 (talk) 14:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think consideration of this merge should wait until the move/rename request above has been determined. - Arjayay (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 10:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Mini CD single]]
Talk:Chromosome 20

message: Some text in this article was originally taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/chromosome=20 (public domain)
I'm not a biologist, so I don't feel I can contribute to this article in an intelligent way. A link between a gene on this chromosome and male pattern baldness was found.  Maybe someone can add this interesting finding? Perwisky (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of political parties in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

message: What are the electoral symbols for each party?  (The Greens have the telephone; NDP the key; ULP the star...) – Kaihsu 17:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added them to the article Saint Vincent and the Grenadines parliamentary election, 2005. – Kaihsu 10:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carson Ellis

message: This was previously speedied as a one-line worthless stub.  Hopefully, this is a better article. --badlydrawnjeff 17:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. --badlydrawnjeff talk 10:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree, looks like a self-promo page at best.  BadlyDrawnJeff maybe you need some wikipedia refreshers? 
Best, Bill  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.31.10 (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Medieval Gaels

message: Wow, who put this up? Great idea, must add to it! Fergananim 17:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Me. I'm writing entries at the moment for as many of the Gaelic nobility of pre-Stewart Scotland as I can, so this category seemed necessary. It's sad that there isn't a corresponding number of Irish entries atm though. - Calgacus 17:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Makhlynets

message: WWI Evacuation
I have moved comment from 142.165.24.207 from the main article to the talk page. He/she wrote "(WHO FLED TOWARDS AUSTRIA??...I AM SURE THAT NO ONE FROM MACHLINIEC FLED.)"
Machliniec was settled by Germans from Bohemia who were very loyal to the Austrian Habsburgs. When Tsarist Russian forces invaded the area at the start of WWI, many families evacuated to what is now present-day Austria.--RJSchwarz 17:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Batrachomorpha

message: This section doesn't look right:
"In his scheme, Batracomorpha is a subclass of Amphibia, containing the following orders:"
Crown tetrapods are conventionally divided into two subclades: batrachomorphs and reptiliomorphs. Crown tetrapods are defined as the nearest common ancestor of all living amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, along with all the descendents of that ancestor. Batrachomorphs are all animals that share a more recent common ancestry with living amphibians than with living amniotes (reptiles, bird, and mammals). Reptiliomorphs are all animals that share more recent common ancestor with living amniotes than with living amphibians.
These definitions are not part of Linnaean taxonomy but part of cladistics. In cladistics there is no such thing as an order or subclass. Both Batrachomorpha and Reptiliomorphs are subclades of Tetrapoda (by the node-based definition, i.e., the crown group). Incidentally, pure cladists use Tetrapoda exclusively to mean crown tetrapods and use Stegocephalia to refer to tetrapods by the trait-based definition. Pure cladists use Amphibia as a synonym for Batrachomorpha.
Paleontologists frequently switch back and forth between Linnaean and cladistic terminology. This is like telling someone where you live in terms of a street address, and then giving your precise latitude and longitude. Both systems work so long as you keep them separate.
In this case, they are mixed up. As far as I know, the cladistic definition of Batrachomorpha is the only one currently in use. Also, whether or not it includes temnospondyls or lepospondyls has nothing to do with the current definition Batrachomorpha, since the clade is defined entirely in terms of living animals. Zyxwv99 (talk) 22:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are entirely right. The problem here is Batrachomorpha is used extremely inconsistently, and the actual underlying phylogeny is not well understood. As a systematic unit, Batrachomorpha is next to useless because any definition is necessarily going to be fussy, either in content or definition. Petter Bøckman (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel most of the inconsistency is caused by limiting the term to basal forms. That's a habit we can disregard here. I adapted the intro to emphasise the implicit Bentonian definition.--MWAK (talk) 06:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phylogenetics
Talk:Hellenismos

message: It is strange 'Hellenismos' was moved here. Many articles on the religions list use transliterated native names, but 'Hellenismos' is used by modern Greek polytheists and has hundreds or thousands of years of usage. It also specifically denotes the main ideas as the Greeks and philosophy (so also culture,) which are involved, rather than just a theistic viewpoint. Epicureanism, an ancient Greek philosophy, claimed chance, not gods, controlled the universe, and this disambiguation has a link referring to Epicurianism, Hermeticism, Plato. The works of Hermes and Plato have been translated as using 'God,' and a recent study shows Socrates & Plato may not have been (poly)theist. Hence, evidence is not all ancients were (poly)theist, and not everyone necessarily is today who is involved in Hellenismos, so the disambiguation is misleading. In summary, since 'Hellenic polytheism' is an English term that does not denote all of Hellenismos, the Greek term, and that it is sufficient to use a native term that is the only one that includes everything, I suggest this disambiguation be returned to 'Hellenismos.' If you do not want to, I recommend making 'Hellenism' ('Hellenismos') the disambiguation.
The old Hellenismos page had discussion requests, so I am not moving this, but where is the discussion?--Dchmelik (talk) 03:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What did you agree with?  The top poster said it belongs at Hellenismos, so you redirected to a page that isn't specifically about the religion at all?  Weird.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.13.103 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is agreed upon, perhaps it should be fixed then? Reigndog (talk) 23:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

text: It is now corrected per consensus. Reigndog (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

text: The problem is, when the editor in question redirected the page prior, all the old redirects went with it and had to be redone.  Finally, an actual discussion has started on the topic, at least I hope.Reigndog (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Hellenismos' moved here?
Talk:Angel Witch (album)

message: This album was NOT released in March of 1980. The label clearly states it was recorded between September and October of 1980.
2601:2C0:8500:2554:58D:190C:D4F2:3950 (talk) 19:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Colex Enterprises

message: Rewriting to remove logo history and to add more on what the company did.....the logo description is not necessary on this page.  --Stdjsb25 17:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: You know what, I think when Coke and Columbia Pictures Television formed Coca-Cola Telecommunications, all shows in 1987 were produced under that name.  And for distribution, they used Coca-Cola Telecommunications, Exclusive Distributor.  King Shadeed 13:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coca-Cola Telecommunications
Talk:Junior commissioned officer

message: Editors of this article may be interested in the discussion at the above talk page over whether there is a Western equivalent to Umrao Singh's rank of Subedar Major.  Warrant Officer?  Chief Warrant Officer?  -- ALoan (Talk) 17:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Umrao Singh]]

message: See also: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1403 --LONDON 19:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Status of JCOs]]
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committtee Code of Conduct/revision1

message: This article should be modified and edited as seen desirable by anyone wishing to do so. Then, it MUST be reintegrated to one final document with Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct for presentation to Jimmy Wales and to be part of Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005. - Ted Wilkes 17:46, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dartmouth Jack O’Lantern

message: Kane5187 noted that this article is the same as Dartmouth_Jack_O%27Lantern. I agree and think the best idea would to be just remove this article and make is a simple redirect to Dartmouth_Jack_O%27Lantern since not only would be the more likely one to be typed, but already has newer updates and has been catagorized. Edit: I just went along and made it a redirect. Seemed rather obvious. Tom Foolery 17:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Paddy Ryan

message: This page (Paddy Ryan) is lined from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazuo_Sakurada
This page is about a boxer who died in 1900, but the Paddy Ryan listed on Sakurada's page was wrestling in the 1980s.
69.47.134.25 (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation needed
Talk:Lexington Broadcast Services Company

message: Rewriting to move the Colex Enterprises article.....--Stdjsb25 17:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Hazel was produced long before Colex came to be it should go under a 5th category stating "Distributed through Colex during 1984-1988 Sony now has distribution rights") Matthew Cantrell (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Hazel (TV series)|Hazel]] 

message: Well, I came to the article hoping it would mention the location of LBS or the origin of the name, and could find neither. -- Deltaray3 (talk) 12:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location, origin of name
Talk:Percy Ross

message: This Google cached page has more info on Ross.  It looks pretty detailed, though I don't presently have time to add any more info than I just did.  Might be useful for another, however. — Frecklefoot | Talk 19:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More info

message: They give 1916 on Find-A-Grave. Lincher 22:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Memory-bound function

message: My senior theis project concerns the use of memory bound functions. I could find only few websites on the Internet that have information on memory bound, and this article is based on a number of papers I've read. I've abstained from going into detail about the implementation of memory bound functions, since it's too technical, but if you could explain it plainly, by all means, please do so. 2994 17:55, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Firstly, there exists a closed-form formula for Fibonacci numbers, so they can be computed in constant time and memory.  Secondly, as pointed out in the article, Fibonacci numbers can be computed in either a memory-bound or a CPU-bound way.  Are there examples of functions that are inherently memory-bound?  That would be a great addition to this article.
Ihearthonduras (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better example than Fibonacci numbers? 

message: Hello! I think that the sections on spam fighting are off-point for this article, but most certainly so for the introduction sentence. To my knowledge, the proposed system has not been implemented. Is itbeneficial to keep it in the article? --Lpd-Lbr (talk) 11:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentions of spam fighting 

message: I propose we differentiate between Memory wall with Memory bottleneck, and Von Neumann architecture#Von Neumann bottleneck. Best. These are all related concept that should be linked. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 09:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differentiate
Talk:What Else Is There?

message: See this: "What Else Is There?" at whosampled.com --TudorTulok (talk) 10:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samples from 3 songs 
Template talk:DBLP

message: I am very new to wikipedia.
Because of that, I do not dare to make the change myself but instead I only propose ... and I don't know, if I'll get any response on this so far blank talk page.
Why are there too slashes at the end of the fixed part of the URL ?
Shouldn't the template say only http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/indices/a-tree/ instead of http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/indices/a-tree// ?
The URLs generated with this template work, but contain a redundant slash ... making the URL look "not nice"
--Vlada Mencl 03:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant slash 

message: I think we are using the wrong thing here. As specified:
*
*
Instead of pieces of the URL, we should be using Person IDs (DBLP pIDs) as specified by the organization's FAQ and in the paper by the lead developer. To rectify the issue, since we now have over 400 transclusions, I propose creating a new template , deprecating this one and transitioning over to the new one. We should probably consider using  too. Uzume (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of making a new template such as , I opted to just add  (and ) for the new behavior. I also added tracking for  via: Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:DBLP/id. We can rip out the old  (and its tracking) once we move everything away from using it. 50.53.1.33 (talk) 04:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like there are only 7 articles left with the  parameter. Nice work! Once they are fixed, the parameter and the tracking category can be removed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Slowly but surely I have been working on this. I noticed you prematurely removed the sub-template tracking (breaking the tracking mentioned above). Why? I am aware of the following discussion: Wikipedia talk:Database reports/Archive 7#Request for report similar to Special:WantedTemplates. 50.53.1.21 (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems we finally achieved this goal and I removed the deprecated (and unused)  support. As a side note, I also updated the category-based tracking to track  instead which is inline with the Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:DBLP/pid tracking update. Uzume (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stable identifier