Talk:List of Intel Pentium Dual-Core microprocessors

message: The chips are beginning to show up in laptops, and on Intel's chart linked from the bottom of this page.  For whatever reason, some third parties are identifying them as Core Duo, though they support EM64T.  They are not yet listed in Processor Spec Finder.  I am assuming they are Merom parts, with all but 1 MB of the L2 cache disabled. — Aluvus t/c 03:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have listed them on the future Intel Pentium-Dual Core processor page for now, they are probably based on 1/2 cache Merom-2M dies which is the mobile version of the Allendale core, it makes sense as Yonah production winds down that Intel would replace the older Pentium Dual-Core with Yonah core with the newer Merom-2M model. Intel is really firing on all cylinders with their Core based architecture, I wonder when we will see some Dual Core Celeron M's.Coldpower27 03:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quarter 1, 2008 for dual core Celerons (.  -- Imperator3733 01:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I have already seen that link, I linked it myself I believe for the future Celeron page, I was wondering when there would be Dual Core Mobile Celerons as that would pretty much transistion Intel's complete lineup, Server, Desktop, Mobile, Enterprise to Dual Core minimum. Coldpower27 03:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: T2330 and T2310

message: Please go with the denotation of Intel as the manufacturer! KiB may be the 'correct' physical denotation, but the commonly 'used' one is still KByte! Or show me on any Intel Specs Sheet the KiB denotation...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.225.191.33 (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: KiB versus KB

message: Intel has discontinued the 'Pentium Dual-Core' brand and renamed the existing processors to simply 'Pentium'. They have also introduced single core processors under the same brand, meaning that they don't fit in here any more, but they also don't fit into the 'Pentium' category, which refers to the ancient Pentium. It's hard to find a good way out for this article, the best I could think of is:
* Move Yonah based Pentium Dual-Cores to List of Intel Pentium M microprocessors
* Move all Core based processors to a new page
* turn this one into a disambiguation page, pointing to those two and to List of Intel Pentium D microprocessors
* Add future Nehalem based processors to a different page.
Alternatively, it could be merged with the lists of Pentium II, III, 4, D and M processors. That would be a really long page, but be more in line with List of Intel Xeon microprocessors and List of Intel Celeron microprocessors
Arndbergmann (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a new List of Intel Pentium microprocessors to serve as a global overview. This should solve most of the problems without a major reorganization. I've also added SU2700 to that list, in lack of a better place. We might want to move T4000 and E6000 Pentiums over there as well, but that could also create more confusion. Opinions? Arndbergmann (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel's rename of the product line, single core processors 

message: This article is missing an information, that all dual-cores are using two CPU cores. Shouldn't this be added? OK, if you know it, it's obvious. But over the last years Intel is confusing more and more customers with their namings and sometimes it's really difficult to know, how many cores are sharing the workload. Michilans (talk) 15:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The name Dual-Core