Talk:Potrzebie

message: There's an inconsistency in the description of the length unit with this name. Here in this article it says it's equal to the thickness of MAD issue #26, but List_of_strange_units_of_measurement#Potrzebie says it's issue #23. I presume that whichever issue it is, there's a copy printed on platinum-iridium pages stored in a vault at bureau international des poids et mesures? :) Bryan 23:50, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 26 is the correct issue, and I have fixed the "Strange Units" page. Google image search can turn up scans of the venerable Issue 33 pages where the article first appeared. The image itself is unsuitable for upload to Wikipedia, due to copyright issues, although I suppose someone could inquire with DC comics/MAD magazine to see if they would be willing to allow the use. The curious (or those seeking a source) may find a scanned copy of one of the pages here, and might try using the Wayback Machine if it should vanish. abb3w 14:25, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Unit) 

message: :Image:Potrz12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Potrz12.jpg

message: :Image:Potrzebie13.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Potrzebie13.jpg

message: :Image:Zip022707.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Zip022707.gif

message: Potrzebie unit system, among "normal" systems, is used in Google Calculator: Example
(Ludwik (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe in 2008. An exhaustive list of calculator units has no such unit. https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/3284611?hl=en-CA JohndanR (talk) 21:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potrzebie units in Google Calculator 

message: why no mention of What It Was, Was Football?  mad's 1958 version of the transcripts (illus. George Woodbride) carried the term.
although this may have been the 10th or so usage, it should merit special attn since the audio is well known outside the magazine.  in fact, many people who have never even SEEN a copy of mad magazine know these illustrations full well from the online video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNxLxTZHKM8 66.105.218.10 (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Griffith 

message: Aren't the following words merely someone's personal opinion: "Its Eastern European feel was a fit for the New York Jewish style of the magazine."?96.235.138.179 (talk) 23:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. However if it were a prominent critic, it would have been OK. Since it is unreferenced/unattributed, I am removing it. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjective opinion