lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:New Executable

message: This article is basically now "go to Microsoft web site, punch a couple of words to the search box, and pray to whatever higher powers you believe in". It needs a) to be expanded to cover subject matter in its own words, and b) use appropriate citation form for the referenced technical document. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've pointed directly to the Microsoft Knowledge Base article to which the article was probably trying to direct you.  You might still have to pray to whatever higher powers you believe in that they don't remove the article, move the article, or completely reorganize the structure of the KB so that the URL breaks. Guy Harris 22:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better explanation 

message: I've removed the citecheck template because there was no discussion on talk about an inappropriate or misleading citation.  Please see Wikipedia:Cleanup resources if some other template is needed and post the reasons on this page. Durova 03:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed citecheck template 

message: Many installers still use this format . Everytime when you get an error mesage like this running a windows setup program under Vista x64 or like this under XP x64, the reason is, that you try to start a 16-bit-program. I have Windows XP x64 installed as one of my OSes in multi boot and I still often get this message when trying to run a setup program. --MrBurns (talk) 03:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Installers 

message: Some programs came as family mode programs and were NE format. These had as a DOS stub actual OS/2 v1 compatible code and so would run under DOS or OS/2. I believe one example was the DOS version of Word 5.
Dryeo (talk) 04:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please clarify what do you mean by "family mode" first? 12:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He refers to "bound executables".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.28.199.19 (talk) 09:24, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOS + OS/2 family mode support 

message: The lxlite program, an OS/2 program to compact LX executables is capable of converting OS/2 NE programs to LX and then compressing them. Only works on files with a minimum DOS stub, no family mode. With the LFN bit set though this can be forced as many programs never set the LFN bit and others excepted long file names even though the bit wasn't set. Also no resources such as icons in the file.
LXLITE is available on hobbes.nmsu.edu including source code.
Dryeo (talk) 04:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lxlite support
Talk:Sameer Bhattacharya

message: this page is almost complete... im working on it, be patient
--Arbocalaviv (talk) 03:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UPDATED

message: Added category Indian Christians --71.30.188.223 03:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Category

message: Currently the article says that he's a member of a "Texan Christian rock band".  I'm not arguing the religious beliefs of Flyleaf, but I wouldn't call them a Christian band.  The band's page also makes no reference to themselves as a Christian band.  Perhaps that should be removed? 129.110.174.233 21:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian Band?

message: Kind of a stretch, seems like... Sheep81 00:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah a real stretch. This article should be redirected to Flyleaf and any info on him added to a band members section. --Chuck Sirloin 15:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: famous?

message: Can I take off the "Cleanup"? I completely rewrote this article, and I also believe that it is not a stub anymore. It is at least a "Start" or "B" rank! --ARBOCALAVIV (talk) 04:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLEANUP 

message: I have found some sources that should be included, but I have no time to read through them and incorporate the material.
* http://www.starpulse.com/news/Brian_Campbell/2009/12/28/a_conversation_with_sameer_bhattacharya_
* http://noisecreep.com/flyleaf-christian/
* http://noisecreep.com/flyleaf-jared-hartmann-sameer-bhattacharya/
* http://theywillrockyou.com/2009/11/sameer-bhattacharya-flyleaf/
 
* http://www.allmusic.com/artist/sameer-bhattacharya-mn0000941586/credits
Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Female Revan

message: I think, in all fairness, that this article deserves to stay up. If the main Revan page remains up then this one should as well. Not everyone who played SW:KotOR played as a male character. And in all truthfulness, referring to Revan as male in the main page isn't strictly remaining neutral at all. You can call it remaining "canon" all you want, but canonically Revan is a lightsided male, and not everyone who played the game played as lightside either. The only real way to remain neutral is to have BOTH intrepretations remain as they are, that way everyone is satisfied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjpb3 (talk • contribs) 
::  User's first edit --  Drini 20:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't the place to discuss this. Try the actual debate page. EVula 19:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tom Atkins (actor)

message: Please calm the talk down and leave out the personal observations. Have a look at WP:CIVIL and be nice to each other.  Follow the policies and guidelines. Check out WP:VERIFY. If you make a statement, you have to back it up by citing a verifiable reference. Otherwise it's WP:NOR and POV. Tyrenius 22:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Civility

message: I've not seen a section like this before on an actor's page and it does raise questions (like selected by who?). I'd have thought a better approach would be to re-write these sections as part of the main career section. (Emperor (talk) 18:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Selected filmography?

message: Why is there no mention of the fact that Atkins is gay? (79.67.101.115 (talk) 11:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality
Talk:Viennetta

message: Box image, full cake, some of the various flavors would be good photos to have. -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 08:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article definitely needs an image of the full product, possibly in place of the current close-up. --McGeddon (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it and added today. Geoff Who, me?  19:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reqphotos

message: A recent edit claimed (without citation) that Viennetta "is a type of ice cream cake made in an austrian bakery in 1865". I've undone the edit because it was a mess, and because it removed existing information as well as adding this unreferenced claim. But I leave this note here in case anyone wants to look into the claim. --Zundark (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Austria, 1865

message: In the app-Version There‘s a mess with the brackets...
It is also sold in Israel by Strauss under the name Fantasia, Herbrew spelling(פנטסיה)[3] as well as Germany[4] and Austria.[5]
I dont know How to fix this bc in the mobile-Version everything is correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:2182:7880:1DF1:AE7D:2B1E:2379 (talk) 12:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong paranthesis 

message: https://www.unilever.co.uk/brands/ice-cream/viennetta/ seems to work though - not sure where it should be in the article - we can add the different kinds e.g. Yule log Viennetta.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.169.156 (talk) 10:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: broken links
Talk:Lameco Eskrima

message: I flagged the article for questionable neutrality; it reads like an advertisement or About Us webpage. Squelch1 (talk) 03:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 
Talk:Delta Bessborough

message: It could be merged into one as the Hotel Bessborough, as that was the original name of the hotel.
*Agreed.Pascal.Tesson 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good Call.  Hotel Bessborough is much better than Delta Bessborough --Sven Erixon 11:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The 225 rooms listed in the article is, I believe, from Marriott and is the number of restored rooms at present, not what the hotel was originally built with. If you actually go into the hotel stairways, there are locked, windowed doors that appear to have many more hallways of vacant, unrestored guest rooms behind them, on the back side of the elevators. How many guest rooms was the hotel actually built with? JL187 (talk) 16:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of hotel rooms originally? 

message: In 1972, Donald, Dick, and Marc Baltzan purchased the Bessborough. Then, Canadian Pacific Hotels purchased Canadian National Hotels in 1982. 
Isn't there a transaction missing in that sentence?
Jidanni (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be an imaginary one added. Refer https://harvest.usask.ca/bitstream/handle/10388/7398/HUBERT-THESIS-2016.pdf#page=52
The Baltzan purchase was 1973 (p.46). Baltzan's ran the place from that time. Therefore, this property could not have been part of the ones CP Hotels acquired from CN in 1988. Baltzan sold it to Delta Hotels in 1989. That is 9 years before CP's 1998 purchase of the Delta chain. DMBanks1 (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transaction missing?
Talk:Aïyb Dieng

message: Can we please have more explanation of the "ghantam" and "chatan"?  It says here that "ghantam" is "hanging bells."  Which culture is this from?  "Chatan" is not explained but I think this is similar to the Indian "ghatam" (clay pot) or Nigerian udu (clay pot).  Any information would be appreciated.  Badagnani 19:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghantam and chatan
Talk:French West Africa

message: ...in which the constituent territories voted to became autonomous republics except for Guinea, which voted overwhelmingly for independence.  
What's the difference between wanting to be an autonomous republic and wanting to be independent? Sounds like the same thing.  Does the author mean that those wanting to be autonomous republics wanted to do so within the framework of the French Republic? --Eddylyons 19:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: .

message: I've been trying to fix a problem with the formatting of this page but I'm afraid I've only made it worse.  There seems to be a huge gap that appears after the title "History" the way it was previously formatted.  Can someone help? Traeshaw (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed your revision, which removed the lead.  Gap is not visible with Firefox running on OSX or Linux.  I would check your browser and default wikipedia display prefs. You can go to the "History" tab to undo changes, especially your own.  Happens all the time: No worries, and thanks for trying to improve wikipedia. T L Miles (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: .

message: no citations for administration structure, where is this information sourced from 128.62.32.63 (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  no citations for administration structure
Talk:Regent Centre

message: on 3 March 2009, TubularWorld said in article space comment that the lettable area value required checking. Just bringing this to the talk page. Bleakcomb (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now, I can't remember where I got that figure from. I'll go and do a bit of digging, and if I can't find anything, I'll remove it. TubularWorld (talk) 11:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I've removed it, as the reference that I was using is out of date. TubularWorld (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Frequency-division multiplexing

message: This is not an article, it's mostly just some pasted-in pictures of one specific implementation of a hierarchical FDM system, with absolutely no textual context given to explain the relevance of the three diagrams. Oli Filth 12:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not an article! 

message: I'm not an expert in CXR; rather an old Switchman but I know a few things.  Added a few hints for the diagrams; that part still needs work.  Also needs brief discussion of L and N CXR, pending writing articles about them.  Converted the term "Single Sideband" into a link to the relevant theoretical article.  Still got far to go.  Jim.henderson 09:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not yet an article

message: Thinking about it for a couple months, I have come to like the idea of splitting off the telephone section (except for a new sentence or two and a link).  Since the diagrams are of the "A" type channel bank that were used with the Bell System L Carrier system and the microwave chains, I propose to name the new article "L-carrier" in imitation of the existing T-carrier article.  Alternate names could be "Channel bank" or maybe "A Bank" unless someone comes up with a better idea.  Actually more of these A banks were used with TD microwave than with co-ax, and a fair amount of the co-ax was working outside the USA and thus not using the "L" name, so maybe another article name would be appropriate.  Especially, moving this material into an existing article would be nice if an appropriate article exists.  Anybody got a suggestion or preference?  Jim.henderson 07:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Call for split

message: I am an electrical engineer who has worked my entire professional career for or with telephone companies and cable companies or their equipment vendors.  I like that the article includes the old analog FDM telephone channel multiplexing hierarchy.  However, at the very least CATV (NTSC and PAL) and radio (AM and FM) should be mentioned for this to be a general article on FDM.  I'll add some of that general material myself when I have some more free time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.236.157 (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone needs to add other common FDM systems
Talk:Emperor Hui of Han

message: I have read the articles Emperor Hui of Han from the English and Chinese WP, now both in my sandbox in German WP. But I feel a little sorry about the two articles. The Chinese version is too short, although the every aspect of his life and governance are rationally proportionally depicted. The English version is good at the detailed informations, but most of them are about his personal life and the relations between the imperial relatives. Liu Ying as an Emperor of Han Dynasty, the first chinese dynasty that had the international influence, what he did as the governance measures over his Han Dynasty should be a large part of the biography. Emperor, is not only an individual attracting many focuses, but also, first of all a public politic person in the national life. ^_* ——Nussknacker胡桃夹子^.^tell me... 20:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, part of it is that really, not that much is known about his reign, due to its ancient nature and because his mother actually dominated the scene.  --Nlu (talk) 08:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A little impression about the English version of the Emperor of Han
Talk:USS John C. Stennis

message: There's an edit war going on, on how to label Sen. Stennis in the "controversy" section. It seems to me the current state, with no characterization at all (neither party affiliation nor political bent) is appropriate. His political party is not the reason there is opposition to the name; his conservative vs. liberal placement on that axis is also not the reason for the opposition. His segregationist policies are the reason for the opposition. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:08, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. - wolf 16:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I couldn't agree more with your assessment on this. Chemprofmatt (talk) 03:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characterization of Sen. Stennis in the "Controversy" section 

message: Why no Popular Culture section?
Especially since the ship was used as a "stand-in" for the Sea Hawk in an episode ("Agent Afloat") of NCIS. 2600:8800:204:C400:4490:734D:26EA:D712 (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because most such mentions don't follow the WP:MILPOP guide. This appearance doesn't appear to either. BilCat (talk) 23:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrayed the "Sea Hawk" in an episode of NCIS 
Talk:Live Nude Girls

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was move per request. This is a policy poster child, and thus could have been listed at WP:RM/TR as uncontroversial.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Easy Sabin aryal (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:George Tiller/Archive 1

message: There were a dozen or so images taken from dr-tiller.com and uploaded to wikipedia. It was claimed that the rights were released, but a) I do not see how that is possible for images that they do not own the rights to (professional headshot, newspaper clipping) and b) I could not find that claim anywhere on the website. If the copyright information can be made clear, through the normal channels WP:BRP, then the images are fine. Otherwise, these images are inappropriate for wikipedia. --Andrew c 20:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just uploaded a image of George and I can verify that it was indeed self-created. Nonameplayer (talk) 23:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I don't have a suggestion for improvement, but this sentence in the LEDE: "The Women's Health Care Services clinic and its presiding doctor are the subject of activism by members of the pro-life movement" sounds really awkward. In particular, the phrase "subject of activism" strikes me as bad. It's obvious what the sentence is trying to say, it just sounds weird. Yilloslime TC 05:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject of activism
Talk:Disquisitiones Arithmeticae

message: perhaps a mention of modular arithmetic - which links to here? Cormullion 20:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Was this 8th section included in later editions of Disquisitiones Arithmeticae? If not, perhaps someone knows the title and if any translations from Latin into other languages are available? Thanks,Rich (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: from current article:"Gauss started to write an eighth section on higher order congruences, but he did not complete this, and it was published separately after his death."

message: The translation of "Quod, in pluribus quaestionibus difficilibus...oportebat." is not only unsourced but also wildly inaccurate.
Clarke's translation (as revised by Waterhouse; Springer 1986) has "In several difficult discussions, I have used synthetic proofs and have suppressed the analysis which led to the results. This was necessitated by brevity, a consideration that had to be consulted as much as possible."
Gambaguru (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad translation
Category talk:43 establishments

message: Entries in this sparsely populated entry are already present in other categories. If you are able to justify retention of this category in Wikipedia, please reply below. --Folajimi 20:30, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These categories are useful for navigation; there's no reason to remove them just because the articles are also in other categories. Superm401 - Talk 10:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mel Street

message: ==Untitled==
Shouldn't we also include his family members? What specific coal mining company were his parents a part of?--24.22.111.99 00:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include family? 

message: Shouldn't we also include his family members? What specific coal mining company were his parents a part of?--24.22.111.99 00:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kven (historical)

message: Should give a reason for the original research tag. The reason is to be found on talk:Kven wherefrom this text originally came. / Fred-Chess 20:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

message: "historical" seems a slightly wrong attribute. Generally, historical means something which is documented in written sources. Its counterpart is pre-historical. Much about these early Kvens is actually pre-historical. I would suggest a more correct attribute, such as "ancient", (not so good) "medieval", "past". Suedois 11:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not very historical 

message: The whole article is mostly nonsense. It needs to be rewritten critically. Kvenland has only been mentioned a few times in a couple of Norwegian sagas, and nothing more. Rest is pure fantasy by nationalist Finnish historians.
:I'm not crazy about it either, but my first priority was to get this topic away from the very real and mostly non-controversial topic about contemporary Kvens. If we redirect it back to Kven, we're starting the whole argument over again. I am all for changing the name of the article, or even merging it with Kvenland. --Leifern 13:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mostly nonsense 

message: The contents are now merged to the article presently at Kvens of the past. These talks should continue at its talkpage, Talk:Kvens of the past, since probably no one checks THIS talkpage any longer. Suedois 16:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Tuberculous lymphadenitis

message: This may be better by being combined with the page Tuberculous cervical lymphadenitis rather than existing separatelyGingkofeesh (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! I will be making my own additions to this page with explanations for each change. I am thinking of contributing to this page as a separate article, as from my reading/research, tuberculous lymphadenitis (which can affect the axillary and inguinal regions as well) seems to be an umbrella condition that tuberculous cervical lymphadenitis (scrofula) falls under. Please feel free to add any suggestions/make changes to my contributions as you see fit! Drexden (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: — Assignment last updated by Drexden (talk) 14:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MEDU 9330 - Expanded WikiProject Medicine

message: Hi all, I can't find a good source that supports the Stages described in this article. Recent literature I looked over didn't seem to mention the staging. Was wondering if anyone agrees with its removal, unless a good citation can be found. Drexden (talk) 20:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stages section - potential removal?
Talk:The Call of Cthulhu (film)

message: I'm not sure why an editor is concerned.  The article is only now being created.  Like the myriad other short articles on movies and other things, it may take it a while for it to acquire notability, such as in the case of this page:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cthulhu_%28film%29.  Additional information from the editor concerned would be appreciated.Hodgson 20:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to address your concerns by adding some info.  BTW, that notability template is pretty lousy.  Why should Wikipedia be limited to that paltry list of topics? Miraculouschaos 17:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Having addressed the concerns brought up by aeropagitica, I'm deleting the "notability" tag. Miraculouschaos 20:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks for that.  I've been buried with work since the original exchange and haven't been able to get back.  The page looks much better now.Hodgson 20:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: The film's plot, production and reception needs to be expanded in ore detail than what it currently has.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot, production and reception need Expansion