Talk:Prism (band)

message: :Image:Prism-Armageddon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Prism-Armageddon.jpg

message: This use should not be editing this article as he has a clear WP:COI as noted here on his userpage. Any edits that include large additions should be under scrutiny. ScarianCall me Pat! 15:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: COI clarification please:     Although I do understand the premise of the COI guidelines, I fail to see how this can be productive with information accuracy.   I'm willing to learn but I also hope this can make sense...  My attempt to update the inaccuracies of the history and update current information regarding the band were removed because of my intimate knowledge of the band it would seem.   Would that connection not likely provide the most accurate information possible?    In addition, my changes were not editorial but were quoted directly from a document on the Prism website.   (btw, my changes on my personal page were made to attempt to clarify that my knowledge was real.   At the time, I didn't realize that would be a problem in my contribution) Jpenner (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that it might not be accuracte (We aim for verifibility not truth), it's just that you might have a bias/slant in your work that would conflict with our neutrality policy. I'm friends with a couple of prominant writers who have their own articles on Wikipedia, but I never touch them because I know them and I might, consciously or unconsciously, give a bias to the article. ScarianCall me Pat! 18:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Jpenner]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Prism (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090601114514/http://www.jimvallance.com/01-music-folder/albums-folder/pg-album-prism-01-prism.html to http://www.jimvallance.com/01-music-folder/albums-folder/pg-album-prism-01-prism.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified