Talk:Baptism in the name of Jesus

message: Added some History as the Article seemed a bit spare.  One a side note I noticed someone refereeing to the Term itself as pejorative. However the term Jesus Name would require reams of disambiguation as Jesus Name Doctrine appear in nearly all Christian Churches including Trinitarian churches. (And Trinitarian seems pejorative to me...) But Jesus Only seems like the logical converse to Trinitarian in terms of identifying the fundamental beliefs involved.  Probably a dead issue as the article is still up, but I felt the need to comment and I apologize for my anonymity.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.48.224 (talk) 00:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New section History

message: The article should also include valid criticisms of the doctrine. For instance, Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants do not recognize the validity of these baptisms, which they view as un-saving, un-sacramental, heretical or anathema. They also reject Arianism as a false doctrine based on similar non-Trinitarian premises. ADM (talk) 15:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms

message: Most of this article seems to be a rehash of Oneness Theology. It's not clear what the differences are, except for the practice of baptizing in the name of Jesus. 
Are there any groups that adhere to Jesus' Name but not to Oneness? Any what, apart from the baptism practice, is involved in Jesus' Name theology? 
-- DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If Jesus' Name Theology always involves rejection of the Trinity, then what is the difference between it and Oneness theology? DJ Clayworth (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Non you will note the redirect . Jasoninkid (talk) 01:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

text: To better answer the first question there are some churches (mostly independent) that hold a Jesus' Name doctrine but are not pentecostal therefor Jesus' Name doctrine is not just a part of Oneness Pentecostalism.  The terms Jesus' Name, Oneness and Apostolic* (*when not associated with Catholicism) are mostly synonyms with Apostolic being the most popular where I live in the US Midwest.  Jasoninkid (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication 

message: "The latter form of baptism is the one performed on most Christians, according to the command of Jesus recorded in Matthew 28:19." Seems rather antagonistic. Jasoninkid (talk) 00:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The "Jesus' Name" doctrine DOES NOT endorse nor contain the "Oneness heresy" nor the "Trinity heresy", but the correct recognition of the "GODHEAD" is the doctrine of The Real Jesus' Name Witnesses. THIS IS FACT. I AM Jesus' Name Witness, I KNOW what we teach and it's not oneness. I challenge anyone to produce it, before God you can have the keys, my titles and deeds and all my possessions and money if you can prove it. But you can't, it's not in there. :)
LET TRUTH PREVAIL!!! 10:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in doctrinal explanation

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Jesus' Name doctrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090227001121/http://www.upci.org:80/doctrine/baptism.asp to http://www.upci.org/doctrine/baptism.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090618075035/http://www.ctsfw.edu:80/etext/luther/babylonian/babylonian.htm to http://www.ctsfw.edu/etext/luther/babylonian/babylonian.htm#3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jesus' Name doctrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117151910/http://www.pawinc.org/ to http://www.pawinc.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120823110306/http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/jwbaptism.htm to http://www.spotlightministries.org.uk/jwbaptism.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.focus-search.com/matthew/matt28.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.focus-search.com/shc/matt2819.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jesus' Name doctrine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141024155913/http://christsforgiveness.com/index/?page_id=15 to http://christsforgiveness.com/index/?page_id=15
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050905022656/http://www.catholic.com/library/Trinitarian_Baptism.asp to http://www.catholic.com/library/trinitarian_baptism.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The recent edits by User:Atlantanaomi83 seem massively NPOV, stating things as historical facts that are at least highly controversial, unless I'm quite mistaken. I'm not into this topic enough to correct the stuff and thus didn't want to do an outright reversion either. Anybody? -- 194.39.218.10 (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. There is a lot of room for expansion of History but it has to be done well and from NPOV. User:Atlantanaomi83 has been blocked for similar reasons on other pages. Mustardseed1 (talk) 10:42, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? Edits by User:Atlantanaomi83