lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Texas State Highway Loop 1604

message: The town of Lone Oak linked to in the article is definitely not the same one being mentioned! just look at it's location on the linked map.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.28.136.108 (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  I've fixed the link. Kuru (talk) 03:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lone Oak

message: 12/19/1958 (sic?) designated US 87 (I-10) east to US 281 north of San Antonio
12/19/1958 (sic?) extended east and south from US 281 to US 90 (I-10)
8/7/1959 extended south from US 87 (I-10) south to FM 2173 at Macdona over former Loop 334
5/3/1963 extended south and east from FM 2173 to the San Antonio River
3/7/1969 loop completed
6/30/1977 redesignated Loop 1604
;Loop 334
2/27/1958 designated I-10 at FM 1604 west and south to US 90
8/29/1958 extended south to FM 2173
;FM 1518
Was from FM 471 in Lacoste south to US 81 (SH 132) at Lytle, then east and north via Somerset and Elmendorf to FM 78 at Schertz, then northwest to US 81 (I-10)
8/23/1973 became FM 1604 from Somerset to SH 16 and FM 2790 from Lacoste to Somerset
6/30/1977 became Loop 1604 from SH 16 to current end of FM 1518
;FM 3465
12/22/1983 from old Loop 1604
;FM 327
3/3/1981 from old Loop 1604
;FM 1937; FM 3499
 
12/12/1979 extended over old Loop 1604 with spur
12/30/1988 spur became FM 3499
; Naming of Anderson Loop
Named for Charles William Anderson (1891-1964) of San Antonio, Texas.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.65.34.102 (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: All it needs is cities in the location column. --NE2 07:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit list attention
Talk:Jared Cohon

message: Bioscribe has been adding information that is connecting Cohon with David Touretzky in some fashion.  Touretzky is not relevant to a bio about Cohon and Touretzky certainly is not what makes Cohon notable.  
Touretzky is a tenured professor, he is free to express nearly any viewpoint he wants as a tenured professor.  Just because DST works for the same University doesn't mean the Cohon "supports" DST's viewpoint on any particular issues at all.  Nor is the "bomb-making" stuff relevant, because this information is not presented to instruct terrorists, but rather to inform people how terrorists already make bombs.  The information that is printed is also available from the U.S. Government directly as well.  This information is added in an attempt to defame the character of both Touretzky and Cohon.  Vivaldi (talk) 05:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of information about Touretzky 

message: Why was this removed?  While the copy of the document at http://www.jhu.edu/~dogee/news/newsletter_2000.pdf appears to have gone, the citation (the 2000 newsletter of the JHU department) is still valid, and the story is, believe it or not, true.
Cohon has been teased by students occasionally for the fact and there's no reason to pretend that it's not true.  We all did crazy things in school, and this edit should be reversed. Bugg42 04:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of New Crusty Nostrils information 
Talk:Articulated vehicle

message: When I started this article it wasn't meant to be a dictionary definition. A dictionary definition would simply beArticulated vehicle : vehicle with joints, and a reference to its Latin derivation.The layman may be unaware that there is a great deal of trailer technology and that an article like this (when finished) would be very informative. It's not good for someone who knows nothing about the subject to alter the wording, throw in a picture of a lorry and then say it should be moved to Wiktionary. On the othet hand, if anyone knowledgeable enough wishes to contribute to the article, be my guest! Apgeraint 06:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: with respect, the onus is on you to add more content to this article if you feel it has the potential to become more than a dictionary definition. You describe a dictionary definition as Articulated vehicle : vehicle with joints, and a reference to its Latin derivation, yet fail to realise that this article, in its present form, is little more than that. I did not "throw in a picture of a lorry", I added an image of an articulated lorry, which I felt illustrated the article nicely. I also changed your wording to make the article read more like an encyclopedia article, formatted per the Manual of Style (with the article title included in the text in bold, etc). └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 18:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: This information is now under semi-trailer. When I started this article, this and related articles were under the wrong headings. Now they've been swapped around so it's O.K.. Apgeraint 19:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary

message: Beginning at "One of the first examples of articulated railway carriages" there is much that is misleading or just downright wrong here... I shall have to rewrite it. To do that I'll first have to create an article on East Coast Joint Stock (presently a redirect to a section in an article about just one of the ECJS services), because the ECJS had one of the first articulated carriages, in January 1907. Admittedly this was a conversion, but the Great Northern Railway (who owned a substantial share in the ECJS) were building new artic carriages from 1911. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Trains and rail
Talk:Machiko Kyō

message: on Turner Classic Movies just a few minutes ago pronounced her name as "ma-SHI-ko KAI-yo" and I know that must be utterly wrong... support anyone? Sweetfreek 06:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Robert Osborne]] 

message: Should it be properly spelled Kyo, Kyō, or Kyô?  The title and text of the article disagree, and other articles spell it Kyô. -Big Smooth 18:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Using the Hepburn transliteration, Kyō is the correct version. Kyô is sometimes used because people don't know how to use the ō character, and is widely accepted academically. --93.194.209.31 (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Looking at google image search, most pictures of her from roles other than Rashomon show her with more-or-less normal eyebrows, so it was probably a stylistic thing Kurosawa had designed for her character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.27.254 (talk) 04:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Accent on last name
Talk:Chest hair

message: Seems like this article is missing information on chest hair patterns for Asian, Middle Eastern (Semitic), and Native American men -- all groups that I have heard have patterns that differ from Caucasian & Negro men.  But that's my anecdotal experience; presumably there are citable scientific studies that have accurate surveys.  Given what's stated in the article about Caucasian vs. Negro men, there probably are significant differences between other groups.  Data on those others would be a useful addition to this article.
Also, the study cited on Negro men seems pretty small -- only 60 samples.  A larger study would be better.T-bonham (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  chest hair patterns by race -- incomplete 

message: The image of chest hair patterns should really say something like "some patterns."  I've seen thousands of guys' hairy chests that followed much different patterns than that.  Look at Zachary Quinto (from the tv show "Heroes") for example. His pattern is like a V shape.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.211.66 (talk) 16:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, but there are also some links now that provide resources with numerous images, some based upon the actual chest hair patterns of the men being studied.  I'd also like to add that the V pattern has been a huge turn on for me, personally, since I saw Nicholas Cage in "Valley Girl."  Unfortunately, I learned years later that he shaved it into that pattern when the director asked him to wax it to look more like a teenager (which the character was supposed to be). He compromised by shaving it into a pattern, which he said that a Punk Rocker would probably do just to be different.  Still pretty sexy, eh?  : )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.232.199 (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I read that when chest hair connects with beard catchin up the neck, it is actually chest hair up to the adam apple. It goes without saying that most these men shave these hair off up to where the chest begins, because they are on the neck regardless of their quality. It is just curious about the idea of them being of the same kind as chest hair, is this true?
Is the belly hair a different kind of hair? I think they are the same as when they connect in hairier men, the look the same and reach similar lengths with similar cycles. So I think lower neck hair belongs to the pattern of developement of chest hair rather than beard, that has its own pattern and is also coarser with a longer cycle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.15.248.55 (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patterns
Talk:Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station

message: From the infobox: "Total power generation in 2007 11,227 GW·h "
GWh is a unit of energy not power. I don't know how to edit an infobox so someone please take care of it.Leonffs (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight wording problem 

message: I have have replaced the bare links used as sources for this article with full citations. Hyperlinks frequently break, and without data like news article titles or website page titles, it is often impossible even to know where to look for a replacement source. Archive sites like the Wayback Machine or Google sometimes help, but often do not. For example, the following link from "External links":
* http://www.nukeworker.com/pictures/thumbnails-110.html
now returns an "error 404" (page does not exist), Google can't find it, and the Wayback Machine is offline as I write this. I have therefore removed the link.
In short, bare links should be never be used as sources for Wikipedia articles. You don't necessarily have to create a fully filled-out citation, but at least include basic title and/or descriptive information (date, author) with the reference. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with bare links for references 

message: Would the person who added the proposal tag to split the article into a (non-existant, at this time) new article entitled 2008 Florida Power blackout please include their rationale for that proposed split here? The fact that there is no article for the blackout yet on Wikipedia (that I'm aware of), and the fact that this article is both very undeveloped and does not contain that much information specific to today's blackout, seems to point to not splitting the article at this time, and without your rationale for tagging it we're left without much to go on. - Ageekgal (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that I've added two sources and sentences on the technical details of the blackout, I would like to revisit the decision not to split.  Do you think the section is splittable now?  (IMHO it was splittable into a stub even before my edits, but that's clearly not consensus.)  Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion regarding proposed split

message: "On February 26, 2008, both reactors were shut down due to the loss of off-site power during a widespread power outage in South Florida, affecting 700,000 customers.[12]
At least 2.5 million people were without power."
Was it 700k, or 2.5 million? --Golbez (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The customer is the person who pays the bills.  There's four persons in my household. 139.138.6.121 (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make up your mind 

message: Is there a reason this article fails to mention the Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station's recent problem of multiple scrams? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent [[scram]]s
Talk:Lahti-Saloranta 20 mm Anti-Tank Rifle

message: A very detailed anecdotal account. Obviously written by a non-native English speaker (who's English is much better then any other language I have) probably with a connection to the subject matter. I have taken the liberty of editing the article for syntax and have tried very hard not to alter the style.
GoodLife 06:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The detailed info should be merged to that article as it's the same weapon.. --Pudeo 14:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Miandam

message: Another ski resort? Please don't add bogus info!! Waqas.usman 06:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ski resort?
Talk:Exercise bulimia

message: Merge with main topic  bulimia  ?
--Gazzag 23:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This topic should be removed, non-purge bulimia is covered in the bulimia nervosa article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.143.224.11 (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DELETE
Talk:Alien Quadrilogy

message: I bought in 2007 in the Netherlands a box titled Alien Quadrilogy, and it contained only 4 discs, each with film and a little extras. It cost 25 euro. In retrodpect, if i knew it was not the real thing, i would not buy it.
Think you'd like to know. Andru nl (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Qadrilogy with 4 discs only

message: As of October 14th I think, there is a new box set called the Alien Vs. Predator: Total Destrucion Collection. I'm wondering if it should have it's own page or just be mentioned on one of these box-set pages like this one. Just wondering.Zabbethx (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Destruction
Talk:List of undecidable problems

message: What is the undecidable problem associated with Penrose tiling? - 72.58.19.66 06:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Given a number N, determine if a machine of a specified number of states will halt after N steps for some computation" is a decidable problem!  (Just run the machine for N steps and see what happens.)  I will fix this in a minute. Ebony Jackson (talk) 15:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busy beaver problem 

message: It might be useful to note for the problems given in this list whether they are in RE or co-RE or neither. Especially some examples of problems which are not even partially decidable would be interesting. 
X127 (talk) 23:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[RE_(complexity)|RE]] vs co-RE vs neither 

message: In a "previous version",
User:D.Lazard added this as undecidable problem. However undecidability seems to be a
long-standing open question. So until a credible reference
is added I suggest to refrain from listing it as undecidable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Ziegler (talk • contribs) 08:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis: Equality of two real numbers (given by arithmetic expressions including exp and log) 

message: In the first paragraph of this article we see:   “There are uncountably many undecidable problems, so the list below is necessarily incomplete.”
Note, however, that each undecidable problem has a textual description, that text strings are countable, and that therefore the undecidable problems are countable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill stoddart 2 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A problem need not have a textual description; in the usual terminology every set of natural numbers is a decision problem. — Carl (CBM · talk) 22:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can there be “uncountably many undecidable problems” ?
Talk:National LGBTQ Task Force

message: Hi - I added verifiable citations where they were missing and deleted the ref needed banner.  Cheers! Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Gura Humorului

message: The claim about improvised gas chambers is a strong one, and therefore needs to be upheld by references. I have read both Radu Ioanid's book on the Holocaust in Romania, and the Wiesel report, and while there is unquestioned agreement about brutality, shootings and deportations, none of them mention anything like this. I also re-checked the link to the Holocaust in Romania wikipage and Antonescu's role in it, and they do not mention it either. The Gura Humorului Jewish community website does not say anything about gas chambers. Also, during Antonescu's post-war trial, the accusers didn't mention that he used (or intended to use) gas chambers, and it would have been strange for them to overlook a fact like this. I added a citation needed mark next to the claim. Could the author please cite the sources or modify the sentence? Thank you,  Eugen Ivan 06:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have misunderstood this page: http://www.jewishgen.org/Yizkor/gura1/gur203.html (didn't check out the name of the camps, to see that some had died at Auschiwitz). Sorry. Dahn 07:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I notice that the Romanian article on the same subject has relevant content on the town in the modern day. Perhaps someone with better Romanian than me would feel like translating it? I can try to make an attempt on this with my rudimentary skills otherwise. Jimjamjak (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from the Romanian article 
Talk:Paphiopedilum

message: where can i find paphiopedilum orchid plants in myanmar. i also live in myanmar. i am very interested in paphiopedilum orchids.
:As it says: "Most naturally occur among humus layers as terrestrials on the forest floor, while a few are true epiphytes and some are lithophytes." So basically you have to spend some time in the countryside. Particularly in the north, where the Shan states of old used to be, many species are to be found.
:You might also want to check out this book on Google Books, it has some more information on species.
:All the best! Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Soul Attorneys

message: Gathering useful info on this band is hampered by the fact that they don't have much web presence. I don't know anything about the band, don't have any of their music; even liner notes would be useful. Almost all the top 50 or so pages are lyrics-related. Of use would be:
*Discography
*More info on members
*More detailed description of their musical style
--Anchoress 06:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:PGP top

message: See Template talk:User PGP. -- Avi (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Auto-cat

message: By request, I created .  It uses only one template and does not require that the user add the <pre> and <nowiki> tags. —— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  18:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I still prefer the top-bottom solution. Having multiple lines in a single template feels weird, and I remember that some template doesn’t work with multiple line parameters. As for the <pre><nowiki>, we can migrate them out. --Franklin Yu (talk) 16:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PGPkey 

message: See [ here] for a change I made (on my own personal copy of this template) to make it add the category on user pages only (and not on user talk pages).  I did this because I reorganized my user page using tabs, made a common banner including my PGP key, and wanted to use this on my user talk page (but without having it add my talk page to the PGP users category).  I'm fairly new at writing/modifying templates, so I'd be grateful for any feedback or suggestions on this work.  Also, I'd like to propose making this change in the production template (assuming there is a consensus, of course).  — Richwales 06:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change to template to make it add the category only on user pages (not talk pages) 

message: Keyservers are printing more chars per line, so I adjusted the width from 35em to 40 em. I also removed the extraneous </divs> which are already in . -- Avi (talk) 20:10, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Adjusted width
Talk:Classical theism (philosophy of religion)

message: I intend to expand this over time with quotes and citations.
Please do not make additions or corrections to these concepts unless it is faithful to the concepts as they were taught by church fathers who held these views and relevent to the observations of the philosophers and historical theologians who observed the connections between these concepts.
Scriptural supports need to be added for these concepts.
--Rob Rohrs 07:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles can probably be merged without doing injustice to either.  Let's work together to improve this, anyway. --Blainster 11:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creator's note

message: The scope of this article is more narrow than the one on Classical theism, because this one deals only with Christianity, while the other covers other monotheistic religions as well.  This should not be an insurmountable problem in seeking a reconciliation of the two.  The other article is just a stub, and its main concern at the present time is to distinguish the thought of contemporary apologists who advocate embracing modern scientific theories from those who don't.  It quickly focuses on the inerrancy question of scripture, which has little to do with the topic of classical theism.  If the scope of classical theism can be established to include all the monotheistic religions, then there should be no problem with removing the mostly irrelevant discussion on the other page and merging this article into that one.  I agree on the influence of Greek thought on Christian classical theism. --Blainster 22:19, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two articles
Talk:City of the Pyramids

message: This post is highly debatable. Attempting to tie up Binah with the 14th Aethyr is highly dubious. Firstly since Binah is the third emanation on the Qabbalistic tree of life how does this square up with the 14 th Enochian Aethyr? It doesnt. Secondly the City of Pyramids symbolism is taken out of context here. Crowley always wrote in code , and the vision is no different. Thirdly Crowley might not have reached the 14th Aethyr and was seeing something else entirely during the magickal operation. Each magickal vision is subjective and attempting to pass this off has "authoritarian" is misguided and lacks study. Also the author of this post hasnt argued effectively how this isimportant to Thelema in general. It could be posted in a magickal thread to show the subjective nature of magick and the occult i dont see how relevant it is. Enochian practice and study is not relevant to Thelema. If you know the material the Enochian material is very Christian in outlook. The point of Crowley's operation was to achieve a magickal grade that was more in common with the Golden Dawn than the freedom of Thelema. The post should be deleted from the Thelema thread or put in the Binah post.--Redblossom 00:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qabalistic Discrepancy?
Talk:Night of Pan

message: Can it be written somewhere that all this mental masturbation by A. Crowley and his likes, has nothing to do with mythology as it is? Many people are becoming confused with what is and what isn't in terms of myths and creatures, gods and religions, with all his idiotic "magical" interpretations he made for his bullshit religion. He has created a melting pot of egyptian, greek, roman, jewish and all kinds of mythology and symbols which are just completely trash to say the least, and he has meddled the waters of clarity in any interpretation someone who is a newcomer to mythology may attempt to understand. On of my students stumbed across this shit, and I had to unroot all this crap from her brain, as it has nothing to do with Pan, and she thought this clown Crowley was some kind of worthy-to-mention classicist who had interpreted this mythological figure... yeah i know.. Anyway, can someone please make a section in all of Crowley-related garbage that has appropriated mythological and religious symbolism that EXPLICITLY states it has nothing to do with the symbols and myths this clown used?
____Ἑλλαιβάριος Ellaivarios____ 00:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification needed