lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:William Eagleson Gordon

message: I have added numerous London Gazette citations to the article detailing Gordon's military history along with associated awards. A table of medals and medal ribbon bar graphics have also been added. 
MMP-1982 (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:All Night Long (Sammy Hagar album)

message: Shouldn't the "Personnel" section say "* Sammy Hagar: lead vocals/guitars" instead of only "lead vocals"? Maybe I'm wrong but I clearly hear two lead guitars in "Bad Motor Scooter"
--Thewizzy (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel
Talk:Florida softshell turtle

message: should be merged with Florida Soft-shell turtle Tremewanbill 01:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: I have edited the common name to be consistent with naming conventions established by the Center for Norther American Herpetology. The name is softshell, not softshell turtle. See their publication entitled Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians (Collins and Taggart 2009). Download this publication from this website: www.naherpetology.org/pdf_files/1246.pdf 
The full citation is as follows:
Collins, Joseph T. and Travis W. Taggart. 2009 Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians. Sixth Edition. Publication of the Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence. iv+44 pp
I did not correct the incorrect initial caps on softshell and turtle.  Wikipedia's inconsistency in applying rules for capitalizing common names for organisms is among the more annoying features.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.7.220.158 (talk) 21:09, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct common name - didn't correct capitals
Talk:Shiro (food)

message: There is a contention that miso soup is made in a similar fashion as shiro. I argue that is unlikely since miso is made with fermented rice...not chickpeas. --Merhawie 01:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Miso

message: This term is never introduced. Maikel (talk) 09:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Taita

message: Why is the term "shiro tsebhi" mentioned in a photo caption, but the term never explained in the text of the article? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 02:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Shiro tsebhi
Talk:Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

message: His last article before he withdrew to the Mayan uplands was published on March 20, 2011.  He is now back at The Telegraph newspaper and has published a column dated July 5, 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.10.90 (talk) 19:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it won't. The protection will assure that. Please examine our policy on biographies of living persons. FCYTravis (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been deleted, stripped and stubbed per OTRS ticket number 2007112710017292. The article as it was before represented the worst in Wikipedia - it was an unmitigated hit piece intended to denigrate its subject and portray him in the most negative light possible. That is not permissible on Wikipedia - it violates our biographies on living persons policy, which demands accurate, unbiased biographical articles. This article will be rebuilt from this point in a balanced, fair-minded manner, covering the broad spectrum of his work and not laser-focusing on a single part of it. Where it discusses his work, it will focus on the factual substance of his work and will represent the views of critics and supporters alike. That is non-negotiable. We must have a quality article here, and the previous content was not acceptable. Please work from here to create an unbiased, encyclopedic treatment of Mr. Evans-Pritchard's life. FCYTravis (talk) 01:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTRS 

message: This page references the Facebook biography, which in turn is almost a verbatim copy of some version of this article (minus the citations), thus creating a circular loop of citations WP:CIRCULAR Franjesus (talk) 18:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular references 
Talk:Utah's 10th State Senate district

message: This user has made edits to only two articles, Chris Buttars and this one. I have reverted changes on the Buttars article, but have left this as is. Most of the changes made on this article were acceptable, however, this user appears to have deliberately removed a link to Buttars' democratic opponent's website during the campaign.
Porlob (talk) 21:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[user:senate10]]
Talk:Ana Montes

message: "Mash-up" is a meaningless buzzword, and sounds childish and silly.  I changed it to "composite" (which is what "mash-up" ACTUALLY means), but if you have something better, feel free.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.134.146 (talk) 21:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the photo caption 

message: The statement "There is no parole in the US prison system" is incorrect.  See, for example, http://www.justice.gov/uspc/faqs.html#q2.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aggielaw (talk • contribs) 15:19, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: From that page, parole is mainly given to DC-sentenced inmates. For federally sentenced inmates, the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 means that people convicted after November 1, 1987 can't get it http://famm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/FAQ-Federal-Parole-11.29.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited content 

message: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/feature/wp/2013/04/18/ana-montes-did-much-harm-spying-for-cuba-chances-are-you-havent-heard-of-her/?hpid=z1  Enjoy! -- ke4roh (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source 

message: The statement 
"a master's degree at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, an alma mater which has historically produced some of the most damaging spies against the US including the likes of Walter Kendall Myers and Alger Hiss, and could by association be considered an un-official incubator for candidates contemplating a life of anti-US espionage."
very clearly violates NPOV, and is not supported by the reference (to a Washington Post article).
Jed (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: We should add the fact that Montes was awarded a medal by the Cuban government (although she was not allowed to take this medal to the U.S.). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:44, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal
Talk:Jowharah Jones

message: I've expanded the article to make it more acceptable, which i why I put a hangon until it can be reviewed. Robert Moore 01:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded

message: She is a supporting actress on an award winning show. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.166.60.169 (talk) 02:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep this article
Talk:Checheng

message: I believe that  and I had reached a good enough agreement in Talk:Yuanshan, Yilan. So I'm going to change the Taiwan province, ROC into Taiwan only. Feel free to add (ROC), and if anyone disagree with me, please discuss first, either on this page or in Talk:Yuanshan, Yilan, before editing. Thanks.--Jerrypp772000 01:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwan
Wikipedia talk:Songs about Wikipedia/User

message: I want to add some little correction:
In Spanish, means Utilizador, but in this context of informatics, we use Usuario... well, with this the song won't macht the rhymes, but it's something that you have to know.--— Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.184.179 (talk • contribs) 22:28 6 feb 2007
:Venía a decir eso, "utilizador" no se usa, en ningún contexto.--Eloy (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Magic Shell

message: The shell seems softer now than it was when I was a kid ... anyone know if they changed their formula? Tulane97 01:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The discussion of the history regarding Tim Price seems completely unverifiable.  If anybody can provide a reliable source for that it might be able to stay in, but claiming that a company stole somebody's idea without giving them any credit or compensation seems inappropriate if there isn't any source other than anecdotal evidence.  DoC352 (talk) 20:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tim Price? 
File talk:WWWlogo.png

message: hello all... i'm just very hastily commenting here, not taking the time to properly format this... i'm still what you could call a "baby wikipedian", despite being a member now for i think more than a year or something, my growth being stunted by my apathy?.... or you could just say i've been a bit too lazy to dig in and figure out all the ins and outs of the wiki formatting code... suit yoselfs... but to cut to the important stuff, why hasn't somebody slapped one of those "convert this image to svg" signs on this one yet? ... somebody please do, because this is a really cool image! thanks! --Black Lab 01:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

message: .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.136.229 (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  this WWW-blurr is a waste of webspace
Talk:St Lawrence Jewry

message: Why does the church have 'Jewry' in its title? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.108.247.12 (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Jewry? 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:St Lawrence Jewry, City of London, UK - Diliff.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 25, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-04-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: This text says the only aisle is on the left of the photo, but there is a wide aisle right in the center. If this is not an aisle, that fact should be explained. Wis2fan (talk) 03:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aisle(s)
Template talk:Brands of the World SVG

message: Is this template still up for deletion, or was it kept as part of the recent SVG-Trademark TfD? nadav 13:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Where do you find the logo number, because I cannot seem to find it. For example, what's the logo number for :File:Soarin' Logo.svg? Elisfkc (talk) 17:37, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, found it by hovering over "Report as obsolete". In my opinion, though, this template should be made identical, or close to Commons:Template:Brands of the World SVG. Elisfkc (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo Number
Talk:Inosperma erubescens

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Inocybe erubescens ()? Korg (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, looks like it's a done deal...all my guidebooks still say patouillardii....ok, I'll try and find out some stuff and move. cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 18:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the update! Korg (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Lycodon aulicus

message: Distribution given here is quite different from what the Reptile Database reports. Micromesistius (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution
Talk:11:00AM-12:00PM (24 season 6)

message: Look at the length of the other episode, before you place the tag on the page calling it too long. Also, I am the one who wrote it, so the tag calling it a copyright violation is also wrong. Therefore, I removed the tag to clean things up. If you have anything you want to change, just change it. And please don't put the tag on again.  Chris 01:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I did not place it originally, it seemed whoever did place the  tag atop the page was absolutely justified in doing so. As creator of the article you have no special claim to it, and the template is appropriate. I have reattached it. Removing it without first correcting the problem could be construed as vandalism, please do not do so again. Goodnightmush 03:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot to link the page. Wikipedia's policy regarding articles like this can be found at WP:WAF. Take a look. Goodnightmush 03:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tag on the page

message: Please make an attempt to use proper grammar, since I had to read several words over again to understand what you were saying. Thank you! 72.141.232.95 17:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed the grammar errors, although I didn't want to. Once again, please make an attempt to use proper grammar, life's too short for me to edit every last thing. 72.141.232.95 17:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar
Talk:Hnau

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 01:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: User:Jfire wants to merge this article. I like the idea if people feel there is something to save (I prodded it)). I think that the essence of the article could be 3-4 sentences. Any thoughts? --Stormbay (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of Hnau
Talk:André Guignard

message: * Add some reference to the papers, and not only to the projects --nct (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TODO
Talk:Combermere Abbey

message: While the postal town for the abbey is Whitchurch, Shropshire, it is located in the Dodcott cum Wilkesley civil parish of Cheshire. See  & . Espresso Addict (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on location 
Talk:Ferrier Lecture

message: I have the Hubel and Wisel lecture in front of me (it was published in Proc R Soc Lond. B vol 198) and the transcript says it was delivered on 2 March 1972, which differs from the date in the article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.6.41 (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Leave Me Alone (I'm Lonely)

message: There was no copyright license for the picture of the single cover, and had been tagged for deletion. I added a licence and brief description
Guylikeu 16:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single Cover/ Copyright 

message: The next single is not Heartbreaker! That was the B-side to another Pink single. The next single line should be left totally blank until it's confirmed by Pink herself or the record company   Guylikeu 23:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next single 

message: I've noticed that on the Australian radio stations I listen to, the expletives have been covered by some awkward editing. "All I ask for is one ****ing hour" has been dubbed into the nonsensical "All I ask for is one wanna kiss you", and "Cutting off the phone leave me the **** alone" has been made into "Cutting off the phone, leave me off the phone". Is this a widespread thing for radio censorship, or is it just for the nice family-oriented stations that I listen to? 210.49.54.79 (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 
Talk:Lucy R. Lippard

message: Lippard's birth year is cited as 1937 here, here, and here.Killick (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i added these 3 links as references. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Talk:Baby duck syndrome

message: Hi, a Google search shows that this term has some use amongst Computer-Human Interaction specialists, mostly tied to the Seebach article. So I'd argue that Baby Duck Syndrome is (only just) notable enough for an article.
I've had a go at cleaning it up. I also removed the stub tag, because I don't see the article ever getting much longer. I've classified it in :Category:Human-computer interaction and :Category:Usability.
I had to guess what this sentence meant: "While Macintosh computers have less vocal incidents of baby duck syndrome, it is still common."
I've requested citations for my guess and another 2 claims.
Does anyone have a citation for the statement that Baby Duck Syndrome explains the preference for QWERTY keyboards over Dvorak? I think that most people would agree; that's why I didn't request a cite for it.
Improvements and corrections are welcome.
Cheers, CWC 14:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather belatedly, I think Path dependence is a better explanation for QWERTY's dominance. Estevezj (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2007

message: I propose that this page be deleted, and a sentence be added to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock-in_(decision-making) stating that "lock-in is sometimes termed 'baby duck syndrome' in the field of computer GUI design".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PatrickJLByrne (talk • contribs) 11:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support I think that this page should be deleted, but I think that the best place for inclusion is Path dependence rather than Lock-in_(decision-making) because this refers to a technical rather than institutional restraints, a distinction made in the lede of the proposed destination. Estevezj (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2011
Talk:Hakata doll

message: The first two paragraphs of this article have been directly copied (including spelling mistakes) from the first reference listed (http://www.japanarts.jp/archives/2006/08/historydoll_hakata.html).  I am rewording them both for clarify and to avoid plagiarism.
I don't understand the last bit of the third paragraph: "its bad quality that was produced factory simultaneously closed appear. Although the image is no longer popular, a few tradition craftwork technician is conveying their skill in the near future."  I assume that the first part means that factory-produced hakata dolls of poor quality appeared as the dolls gained popularity after World War II, and that the second part means that some artisans are once again producing Hakata dolls in the traditional way, but some of the words don't make sense to me in that context ("closed" and "in the near future" in particular--are artisans currently making traditional Hakata dolls at the moment or are they only talking about it?).  I am changing the text to say this clearly, but if I am mistaken please correct it or let me know here.  Clockwork 20:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Shepherdess Pie

message: Does this really need it's own article? Could we just move this information and photo to the Shepherd's Pie article, and include a redirect there? - TheMightyQuill 02:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 16:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I concur. --Zeamays 18:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

text: yes, would be a good idea, if the name "Shepherdess Pie" was anywhere in the redirected article.  80.203.88.132 (talk) 08:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, Shepherdess Pie needs a mention. Gordo (talk) 09:38, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible merge?
Talk:Hard space

message: I have encountered a problem with non-breaking spaces at the Wikipedia Manual of Style. See here for a presentation of the difficulty, and a kludge solution. Has anyone got a better solution? Please post any suggestions at that location. – Noetica 02:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for help 

message: The character of interest here has been called in all the coded character-set standards for the last  quarter century the "no-break space" and is commonly abbreviated as NBSP (refs: ISO 8859, ISO 10646, Unicode, all the ECMA character-set standards, and two decades of literature on the subject). Can we please stick exactly to this well-established well-defined unambiguous technical term, and not muddy the waters by introducing lots of new fantasy terminology, such as "non-breaking space" or "hard space"? Thanks! Markus Kuhn (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct name: "no-break space"
Talk:List of sociology journals

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]

message: I've found it useful to use redlinks on lists to indicate articles in need of creation. Granted, there may be better places to do this. Is there a WP editing guideline that addresses using redlinks on lists? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks
Talk:Hot work

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I have tried unsuccessfully to add a link to the closely related French page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permis_feu. If anyone knows how to do it, it would be useful to add this link in the "Languages" section in the left-hand bar of the Article page. Merci! UBJ 43X (talk) 14:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Now fixed. BP OMowe (talk) 11:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to similar French article 

message: There are five other language linked to this page, suggesting least similar approaches have been taken in as many countries, but none of the countries are mentioned in the article. I can fix the Swedish section in a few days, but as is the article is heavily centred on USA/UK. BP OMowe (talk) 12:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global perspective
Talk:Rohonc Codex

message: All discussion before redirection from Rohonczi_Codex was left at Talk:Rohonczi_Codex.
* Previous history of contribution.
* orphaned editions of Terminus Technicus 
*Unsuccessful move :( to tmp name, In order to move(rename) the [Rohonczi Codex] to [Rohonc Codex] -see Talk:Rohonc Codex tmp Talk:Rohonc Codex tmp1 Nasz 02:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Shouldn't the article contain criticism of the alleged translations/interpretations? They seem rather far-fetched... 惑乱 分からん 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: ::This section is basically original research, even if not committed to a single conclusion. It should be published elsewhere, e.g. in a blog or some forum devoted to the topic.  Wikipedia is not the place to discuss the codex, only to report on theories that have been published elsewhere and have had at least some support by others. --187.106.62.53 (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: How to build a roadmap to it's demystification (by Mart Vabar)

message: Isn't Rohonc Codex tmp the exact same article? Why is it repeated? ʄ!•¿talk? 15:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rohonc Codex tmp? 

message: As it was instructed by the Translate tag, I translated a couple of relevant sentences from the corresponding Romanian wiki page. They formed a part of section "Language and script", subsection "Daco-Romanian hypothesis".
terminus technicus 16:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations from the Romanian wiki 

message: Is it possible that the Rohonc Codex is a heteric version of biblical texts, enciphered to be hidden from the upcoming power of the inquisition?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.172.59.47 (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heretic Version Of Biblical Textures 

message: '#s' nie arabskie a rawskie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:248:4301:6e23:4a5d:60ff:fe32:8309 (talk) 00:49, January 25, 2016
OstromirovoEvangelie_1056.pdf pg 174 right-up CR script; point here higher resolution scan plz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.90.196.227 (talk) 03:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 5/\