lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) People's War

message: What's the relation between Naxalites and the Peoples War Group?—iFaqeer | Talk to me! 21:28, Sep 30, 2004 (UTC)
:PWG falls under the naxalite banner. Naxalite is a loose grouping of those following a similiar ideology. Lihaas (talk) 15:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naxalites vs. PWG

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_India_%28Maoist%29 Lihaas (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, these are not identical. CPI(Maoist) was formed through the merger of PWG and MCC. --Soman (talk) 06:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That;s true, but there is some overlap in content. Lihaas (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to start cleanup of the article. The two should not overlap, they are clearly notable in their own right both of them. --Soman (talk) 17:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: This article was tagged for copyright evaluation on January 20th. Investigation shows that on July 2008, content was placed in this article which duplicated the previously published . Text was also copied into the article at that time from . The current version of the article seems to be therefor an unauthorized derivative work of those sources. One is explicitly protected by copyright; in the absence of verifiable evidence otherwise, the other is presumptively copyrighted as well.
The article will need to be completely rewritten or reverted back to the last clean version, here. I'm resetting the clock on the investigation because the contributor of this text, who may be able to offer evidence of permission or otherwise clarify these concerns, was not notified. The article will be revisited in a week to see if permission has been provided or the article rewritten in the temporary space now linked from the article's face. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns

message: moved per WP:COMMONNAME. Both editors appear to agree that the group is better known as the people's war group and per the commonname policy, that's where the article should be. --rgpk (comment) 18:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Communist Party of India Marxist Leninist People's War 19 results People's War Group 2,180 Per WP:COMMONNAME it ought to be changed, never mind just common sense. Tentontunic (talk) 00:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *CPI(ML)PW was the actual name of the party, "PWG" the name ascribed to it by media. There is a point in using the actual name, which is less mystified that the nickname and gives a better idea of what type of organization we are talking about. In any case PWG name is clearly mentioned in the intro of the article. --Soman (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Nightmares Made Flesh

message: I figured I'd put this here as there is more space than the edit summary gives, and so any points can be discussed.
*Restored the wikilink for Bloodbath in the infobox, most infoboxes have a wikilink for the band in them (see Template:Infobox album).
*Removed the piped link to 2004 in music, according to WP:ALBUM.
*Kept the line break in the lead, that does look better.
*Restored individual song writing credits, why not be more specific here? Writing credits taken from allmusic, which is a reliable source.
*Removed the tracklist template. First off, if we're going to have one tracklist template, might as well put the whole tracklist in the template, not just 2 songs. Second, I'm not sure why the bonus tracks need their own tracklist, they look fine as part of the main tracklist (the small notes beside the songs explains what release they belong to). Third, why should that separate tracklist be collapsed? Template:Track listing says the "collapse" parameter is "Useful for very long lists or pages with several lists", and I don't think this page falls under either category.
**Edited to add: Put tracklist into tracklist template.
*Removed the ref to freecovers.net, I doubt that's considered a reliable source. The CD booklet itself is considered a reliable source (at least, as far as I've been able to determine), but for the information given in the Personnel section, I don't think an explicit citation is needed (unless the information given is potentially contentious).
*Restored the wikilinks to various instruments and musicians. I'm not sure why these were removed (and why some were removed while others were kept), WP:ALBUM states that both should be wikilinked if there are articles about these subjects.
*Kept a couple of the wordings of instruments (lead vocals, backing vocals) and musician credits per the album credits. Removed various subsections in the Personnel section (the person mastering the album is not a "guest"), added production info.
Hopefully that helps to explain my reversions. If anyone wants to discuss anything, let's bring it up here. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Further reversion explanation: The producers, engineers, masterers, etc, are not guests; there is only one guest, and he is mentioned to be so. Kept wikilink to lead guitar. Restored wording from album credits regarding production/engineering. Removed "US" from cover art credit (I have a European version of this album with his artwork, for example). Minor change in artwork credit. Edited to add: Restored album credits according to allmusic, added in the tracklist for those credits. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of recent edits
Talk:Interstate 294

message: Proposed interchange on I-294 and I-57?
In 1999, authorities had a proposal of building an interchange on Interstate 294. do explain please...
: Should be addressed. ---Rob 18:10, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comments

message: Should we merge this article with Tri-State Tollway; or keep it as a seperate page. I'm weakly opposing on merge because it has its own history to keep as a seperate page.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 20:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or not? 

message: I-294 does not hit US 20 in Berkeley. I think rather that it's Northlake. Someone should correct that. 99.56.13.119 (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berkeley 

message: Yes, there is a expanded route description, however, there are no references. Without any refereneces, it won't count as expansion.
Thanks to @Imzadi1979 for corrections. 
Cilabsuhsk (talk) 03:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Route Description
Talk:Pirate radio in North America

message: This is the expansion page from the main topic called Pirate Radio. It was created due to space limitations on the original page. MPLX/MH 21:48, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page says that pirate radio tends to be centered around urban areas such as... Toronto, yet there's no mention of pirate radio in Canada.  Does anyone have any info? Matt Deres 03:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada

message: Can someone please clean-up or remove this section as per WikiGuidelines? --Crash Underride 16:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_radio_in_North_America#Partial_list_of_pirate_radio_stations_in_the_United_States| Partial list of pirate radio stations in the United States] 

message: I find this station rather interesting. However, when I tried a google search on this station, I got no results for it other than this wikipedia page. Is there any proof that such a station existed?--Namesrich1990 (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice of the Sea Cucumber? 

message: If this article is supposed to be about North America, why is there no mention at all of Canada? Certainly pirate radio exists (there was some kid south of Ottawa on 91.9 a few years back), quite apart from the whole TV question (Star Ray TV, for instance). 2001:5C0:1000:A:0:0:0:783 (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada? 
Category talk:Nintendo DS games

message: There was one site RewiredDS.com who added their link to every DS game template, even though the site did not have any information, screenshots, etc. for most of the games. I understand it's hard to get word out about your website, but please find other places beside an online encyclopedia. (Unless your site has something unique to add). Sean WI 20:08, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Refrain From Advertising Your Own Sites
Talk:Radio Swan

message: This is the expansion page from the main topic called Pirate Radio. It was created due to space limitations on the original page. MPLX/MH 22:09, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have now added a full page of original text to the initial stub. MPLX/MH 03:39, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  First addition of text to the article page 

message: This seems material to be authentic so now adding citations and references. El Jigue 2-18-06208.65.188.149 15:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:U Thant Island

message: This article lacks in-line citations and freely uses biased terms casually, such as "bonus" and "inconvenient."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.197.84 (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased terms

message: It appears that "U Thant Island" is actually used for official city purposes, while "Belmont Island" is still used for federal (and possibly state) purposes.--Pharos (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  City official name vs federal and state official name
Talk:Hydronephrosis

message: marked this a copyvio - website says "Copyright 2002 A.D.A.M., Inc. Any duplication or distribution of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited." Whosyourjudas (talk) 22:37, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I think Obstructive uropathy should be merged into this page. They are really the same thing. Robbins equates the two terms on page 1012: "unrelieved obstruction almost always leads to permanent renal atrophy, termed hydronephrosis or obstructive uropathy." Chaldor (talk) 08:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *I realize that, but given that the primary sequale of obstructive uropathy is hydronephrosis, and there is only stub-level content in obstructive uropathy, it should be merged into the hydronephrosis section as a cause. If there is ever enough content to merit a split between the two concepts, then I would support that. However, as things currently stand, there is not enough content to merit an obstructive uropathy article all on its own when the hydronephrosis article is more comprehensive and so closely linked. Chaldor (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge w/ Obstructive uropathy 

message: Might treatment also include Ureteric stent?
--Ocdnctx (talk) 03:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Might treatment also include [[Ureteric stent]]? 
Talk:British Indian Ocean Territory

message: Why does the quick facts box say there is one permanent inhabitant? The official government website says that there is no permanent population and I can't find any other source supporting the number of 1. 2001:9E8:A33D:9D00:A59F:3C46:AE08:8BCF (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the permanent population to 0. It must have been a typo or subtle vandalism that occurred months ago. DDMS123 (talk) 21:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permanent population
Talk:Roman ring

message: Is Hawking chronolgy protection conjecture supposed to be Hawking chronology protection conjecture?  I'm not familiar with that conjecture, so I wanted to ask before changing it. pie4all88 23:06, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be "chronology". -khaosworks 01:22, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: And the link that works is Chronology protection conjecture, without the Hawking. Bryan 20:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mispelling?

message: Those three diagrams showing wormhole arrangements need further explanation, as they stand I can't tell what they're supposed to be showing. What are the time and space displacements of the various wormhole ends? Also, while I'm at it, why are they stable and how do they evade the chronology protection conjecture? Bryan 20:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images need explanation 

message: Assuming the "ring" is formed when you build a loop of them, in what sense is it Roman?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.196.17.197 (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the idea was started by physicist Thomas Roman, as can be read here : http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9702043.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slereah (talk • contribs) 08:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't suppose someone would mind explaining the name would they?
Talk:Sublime (album)

message: I got to this page by searching for a song on the album, "Caress Me Down." I think it would be better if "Caress Me Down" had its own page. GassyGuy 23:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caress Me Down 

message: *How many copies has it sold?  I think that should be listed. TheDavesr 03:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the RIAA's searchable Gold and Platinum Database, the album hit the 5x platinum level (5 million copies) at the end of 1999. --jh51681 07:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Platinum certification?

message: For the part about the 10th aniversary re-release, it says the song "Trenchtown Rock" was previously unreleased, but it was released on the album Second Hand Smoke, so shouldn't someone fix that? Dark Chili 04:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Also, for anyone who bought it from Best Buy, check the sticker on the packaging. It has a pass code for a bonus track download at . The code that came with my copy let me download a live version of "We're Only Gonna Die for Our Arrogance." Did anyone get a different code or a different song? FFWP6MpJF is the code on my sticker. --jh51681 06:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I retried my code and it was denied, so it's only for one use. --jh51681 06:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trenchtown Rock

message: The font on the back of the person on the front cover looks like Cloister Black. What do you think? 74.116.137.2 03:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front Cover Font 

message: The vinyl edition of the self-titled Sublime album had a recent "Back to Black, 60th Vinyl Anniversary" reissue.  The original version of "Doin' Time" (i.e. "doin' time..." is sung in the chorus, rather than "summertime...") is reinstated on this release.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.177.240 (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Doin' Time

message: To satisfy and remove the bare URLs tag, I fixed most of the references using Reflinks and hand-coded a few more.
However, the issue remains: far too many references use far too few sources. The vast majority come from AllMusic, SongFacts, and some weird site called "Sublime STP" that looks amateur.  Can we find some more legit source material?
-- Brhiba (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The first paragraph of the background has almost nothing to do with Sublime the album its just about the beginning of the band. I think the background section should be smaller and have less information about the formation of the band seeing as its not their first album. Looking for consensus. Alienmandosaur (talk) 03:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:Ellen DeGeneres

message: The link for the MSN story on the 2,000th show surprise is marked as "perm dead".  Here are alternatives:
* Watch Jennifer Aniston and Justin Timberlake Surprise Crash Ellen DeGeneres’s 2,000th Show (Vanity Fair)
* Jennifer Aniston and Justin Timberlake take Ellen by surprise! (AZ Central)
* Justin Timberlake, Jennifer Aniston surprise Ellen Degeneres (Business Standard)
*  Ellen DeGeneres tears up as she celebrates 2000th show with surprise guests Jennifer Aniston, Justin Timberlake and lots more Ellen DeGeneres celebates (Daily Mail)]
* https://www.latinpost.com/articles/94498/20151113/jennifer-aniston-justin-timberlake-make-surprise-appearance-ellen-degeneres-2000th.htm (Latin Post)
* Ellen DeGeneres celebrates 2000th show(New York Daily News)
* Jennifer Aniston, Justin Timberlake surprise Ellen DeGeneres on her 2,000th show (Today)
* Jennifer Aniston and Justin Timberlake Surprise Ellen DeGeneres on 2,000th Episode (US Weekly)
* Jennifer Aniston, Justin Timberlake Surprise Ellen DeGeneres on 2,000th Show (Video) (The Wrap)
Fabrickator (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for 2,000th show surprise
Talk:Bairbre de Brún

message: Was Bairbre de Brún or Mary Lou McDonald the first elected MEP? Each page is claiming they were - is there any way of determining which takes precedent in any seniority rankings? Timrollpickering 23:19, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to remember that the UK European elections were held on the day before those in the Republic of Ireland, so that might have something to do with it. Or it could be that Bairbre was the firs elected in NI and Mary Lou was the first in the Republic, although Sinn Fein don't usually recognise such distinctions! NotMuchToSay 18:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 
Talk:M3 submachine gun/Archive 1

message: There's likely a better name for this article then M3 SMG.
:How's M3 Grease Gun sound? Oberiko 23:46, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: A curved barrel?  Serious?  Why would you put a curved barrel on any gun, much less an SMG?--Polyparadigm 03:48, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Curved barrel

message: I've searched online, and I've been unable to find any references to the use of the M3 in the Gulf War. Although it sounds like a fascinating story, it needs to be verifiable.
"drivers in the 19th Engineer Battalion, which was attached to the U.S. 1st Armored Division, deployed with the M3A1 as an alternate arm"
--Bluepdx 00:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Golly, I guess eyewittness reports aren't enough.  Yes, they were there, in tanks or in armories, but not used much. Of course, small arms of all types were seldom used.  Given we didn't lose a single tank (that I'm aware of) there was absolutely no reason for the tankers to have used them.--Asams10 02:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim of Gulf War use 

message: I think that the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) made a suppressed version of the grease gun, probably from the M3A1 variant because it appeared in the early months of 1945 (quoted in [www.smallarmsreview.com/pdf/OSSPistol.PDF]) Rob1bureau 09:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suppressed version ? 

message: The following information is courtesy of Bob Caulkins. It was placed in the article by an anon. It was rv'd as original research, so I copied it from the page history to give everyone a chance to read it. 
"I carried a grease gun in Vietnam while I served with the First Marine Division (66-68). There are a several of neat things about the gun that don't appear in the description and I'd like to tell you about them. The gun had a built-in oiler in the base of the grip. After turning the gun over, the knob seen in the illustration is unscrewed revealing an oil reservoir and an oil applicator. The wire stock was a masterpiece of American ingenuity. It was a wrench for removing the barrel, the barrel had two grooves machined into it into which the wire stock was placed and then turned to loosen the barrel. One of the stock rods was threaded at the forward end to take a bore brush and drilled out to take a cleaning patch, and finally, there was a small "L" shaped piece of steel welded to the butt of the stock, as seen in the illustration, that functioned as a magazine loader. Trying to thumb load 30 rounds into the mag was a chore. This twenty-eight dollar, or so, piece of stamped, welded and machined metal was a beauty, on the several occasions when I needed it, it never failed me. "
Mytwocents 17:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anecdotal story

message: can somebody please tell me why this article says other countrys copied this design? if memory serves me the u.s. copied it from them. look at the dates. i might be wrong. if it is trying to say it was copied from them it should be changed to be clearer.  63.22.210.20 06:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copying from other countrys
Talk:Politics and government of Nuevo León

message: I translated this. I have no particular expertise on the subject, so I can't vouch for the accuracy of the information. I may also have been confused about certain details. Review by an expert would be welcome.
I am particularly confused by a few matters related to the legislature. The plurinominal / proportional representation system is undescribed. The chart shows independents in plurinominal seat, which makes no sense to me. Also, the numbers in the chart disagree with the numbers in the text. -- Jmabel 00:51, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)
----
Jmabel. I am not an expert, neither a proficient english speaker, but i will try to explain some things.
Transtlation:
"por ingresar a un cuerpo del ejército federal residente en el estado" would be better translated as "for enlist itself into an army federal corps in the state". All people in the federal army are subject to federal law, and most specific to army law.
: I agree that mine was not a literal translation of the Spanish-language article, but I believe the latter is misleading. Are you telling me that if a Nuevo Leonese joins the army today and is stationed in Nuevo Leon he loses his state citizenship? Given the context of the times in which this Constitution was written, I'm moderately confident of my interpretation. Perhaps my confidence is misplaced: do you have a source on this?
: Agradezco que el mío no era traducción literal del artículo español, pero creo que el artículo español extravia. ¿Me dice Vd. que hoy día, si un nuevo leonés ingresa en el ejército federal, pierde su ciudadaña nuevo leonesa? Dado el contexto de la época en cual era escrito esta constitución, mantengo una cantidad moderada de confianza en el mío interpretación. Quizás tengo confianza equivocada: ¿hay Vd. fuentes cerca el asunto? -- Jmabel|Talk 19:00, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)
:: The Article 38, Section IV says: "por pertenecer al Ejército Federal con mando de fuerza en el Estado". It means that your citizenship will be suspended if you are (or become) an Army officer in charge of federal troops entering or stationed inside the state borders. Ruiz 04:22, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The independents got their seat by proportional representation of a 4-party alliance that got dissolved. Short after the elections one broke up with her former party and became independent, another became a green (PVEM). I adjusted the numbers in both the table and the body of the article. Ruiz 04:22, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Category talk:Jamaican people

message: So, stupid question, but why is the category "Jamaican people" when many of the entries use "Jamaicans"? Is there an MoS ruling on this, or do they object to the abbreviated form? -- nae'blis (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I don't work with bios much, so I didn't realize it was standardized that way...seems clunky, but whatever. -- nae'blis (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled