lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter T. Daniels

message: Is Peter T. Daniels really so important that he merits a whole page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.74.99.84 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 27 July 2006
: Heh, well, I guess he wouldn't be sorry if it went away; he said once,
:: It [the Wikipedia article on me] was quoted to me once, and yes, it had some “accurate facts” in it.
: —Tamfang 17:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So start some articles for those more-deserving scholars. —Tamfang (talk) 19:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

text: He is the most important scholar in many aspects of writing systems. People may gripe about what others have posted about him, but that does not detract from the fact that the person who is the topic of the article is important in his field. Pete unseth (talk) 13:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

text: "He is the most important scholar in many aspects of writing system" - You've lost me there. Minion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.19.13.227 (talk) 01:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he really so imporant? 

message: Is he alive is he dead, when was he born etc.--HalaTruth(ሀላካሕ) 14:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, he was alive as of November 27.  —Tamfang 09:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More info

message: I removed the external link to a page by (about?) him at elsevier.com, because it was broken.  I searched for, but could not find, any other page about him.  In particular, he does not appear to have a page at Cornell.  It would be nice for someone to correct me on this! Mcswell (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rm'd external link

message: Someone removed the line about Daniels' interest in cryptic crosswords as "not relevant". I don't see why that's so bad as a brief biographical mention; it would seem to have a bearing on his general linguistic interests. Equinox (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless it's been remarked on in independent reliable sources, it sounds like someone recognized his name on that newsgroup and decided to comment on it in the article, more like "let's mind our own business" rather than "this merits being reported here". It would be like seeing David Hockney knitting one day and adding "Hockney has been seen knitting in public" to David Hockney. Largoplazo (talk) 01:10, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find a source for this trivia so removed it. Onceinawhile (talk) 16:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptic crosswords
Talk:Culion

message: This aricle previously has the "cleanup-verify" tag and the following text:
:In 1740, Culion was established by the Recollect Agustinian Friars as a bastion of defense against the "Moro Raiders".  Because of its rich seawater and fertile lands, it attracted migrants from all over the country. It became a municipality in 1992. Today, Culion is better known as the seaweed capital of Palawan.
Source: Culion Museum
Hey, just thought someone might want to mention that culion was a former leprosy colony.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.127.82 (talk) 02:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

message: It says in the article, "...according to the 2006 census." Shouldn't this be updated?
And by the way, I added the information from a verifiable source (though out of print) that Culion was a 
former leprosy segregation camp. Why is that the only reference on this page?--Dale S. Satre 01:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 
Talk:Back Bay station

message: That picture is way too big to start an article because all other features of it are dwarfed by comparison
Ahem.
And since this picture is about the station, not the John Hancock Tower, a good place to crop it would be about halfway down.  Otherwise the picture is ambiguous.
Use the South Station (Boston) article as a guide.--Loodog 23:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Loodog 04:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIG PICTURE 

message: I'm under the impression that the northernmost platform has two tracks for the Framingham/Worcester Line and the Lake Shore Limited, to the south of that is the Orange Line platform, and to the south of that there are three Northeast Corridor tracks (Acela Express, Amtrak Regional, and the Needham, Franklin, Providence, and Stoughton Lines), but I'm not entirely sure if that's the case.  In any event, it would be nice to document this in this article, perhaps with a map.  JNW2 21:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Platfrom configuration

message: Is there any way to get an image of the station without the timestamp on it? If there is an image out there, please don't hesitate to place it on the page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Super Mario video game remakes

message: Each of these games should be split into different articles. That's basically all I have to say. -- A Link to the Past July 5, 2005 05:57 (UTC)
:Your reason being? Dar July 8, 2005 22:30 (UTC)
::They're not direct ports. SMA4 has a lot to discuss about - the e-Reader capabilities for one. -- A Link to the Past 20:41, July 9, 2005 (UTC)
:::Seems to me that the article doesn't need split up, but that separate articles could be made additionally, with links to said articles beneath each respective sub-heading within the existing article.  There are other game articles which have this structure.
:Good point.  I just wrote out an SMA4 article and I need help with some of the e-Reader stuff.  Hbdragon88 22:36, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article should be use Template:Infobox VG. 133.205.53.152 14:20, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Split them up

message: Someone deleted the SMB Deluxe section, saying it was a port, not a remake. I totally disagree with this. After all, it includes lots of stuff that wasn't in the original game, like challenge mode, Vs. mode, and the Toy Box. Sure, it is possible to play the original game in pretty much exactly the same way as on the NES, with the same graphics, but that doesn't mean it's not a remake. After all, if it were supposed to be the same as the original, it wouldn't be "deluxe"! ComputerBox
: Deluxe was a remake and should absolutely be added back on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.87.162 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Mario Bros. Deluxe: remake or not? 

message: Has Nintendo actually referred it to the "Super Mario remake series" or is this just a fan invention?  Hbdragon88 19:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fan invention. Frankyboy5 23:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

text: It's not an invention, it's a descriptive term. Tell me if you have a better word for the merged article. Andre (talk) 03:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual name? 

message: In SMA2 if you hit an enemy as Fire or Caped Mario you revert into super mario, not little mario as in the original. According to IGN, Yoshi's Island had minigames not featured in SMA3 and secret levels are unlocked easier. Frankyboy5 23:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of SMA games are faithful ports 

message: Should we include SMAS a well because it is also an enhanced remake. BTW, some of the remakes use sprites from the latter. Frankyboy5 00:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to deal with only the handheld series, so I'd leave it off for now. Hbdragon88 08:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Include Super Mario All-Stars?

message: It could be argued that Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga is a remake because it includes the Mario Bros. arcade game.
It could be argued that New Super Mario Bros. is a remake because it used the same Rec Room games as Super Mario 64 DS.
Are we going to mention these?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.16.36.210 (talk) 01:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Remakes
Talk:William Cullen Bryant High School

message: The portion about statistics takes an obvious position about actions taken recently at the school. Namely, that the editor disagrees with closing the school or hiring new teachers. It should be edited to state facts instead of opinions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.136.127 (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Neutrality
Talk:I Want to Take You Higher

message: An infobox was requested for the Ike & Tina Turner version of "I Want to Take You Higher" at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of notable songs/7.
Good entry. I'd fix this if I were competent: 'the song's frantic crowd of "higher!"' --Wetman 5 July 2005 06:28 (UTC)
:I fixed it. Should be "cry", not "crowd". --FuriousFreddy 5 July 2005 14:06 (UTC)
Is it not necessary to point out that "Advice" by Billy Preston is the prototype of this song? --1523 12:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rich Harrison

message: I am inquiring on behalf of Mr. Rich Harrison, what would need to be done to have his profile removed from the Wikipedia data base? He has found it to be quite inaccurate and would prefer to see it discontinued. If you need verification from him I'd be glad to provide it. I look forward to hearing back from you regarding this matter. If you'd like to contact me directly via email reach me at ktemple0813@gmail.com. Thank you for your time, it's greatly appreciated.
Best,
~Keith Temple
:We would probably not be willing to remove the page, but we certainly want to get it right. See WP:Biographies of living persons/Help for advice about what to do. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal

message: ? 24.203.85.41 (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Old Man sun? Mother's info?
Talk:Taste of the Danforth

message: As the subject says, I've added the Food & Attractions sections, the Access section, and reworded/updated the opening. The festival is on right now, so if you have a digital camera now would be a good time for some reference pics. 69.194.35.109 04:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no mention of the Greek desserts and pastries that were available during the festival, such as Baklava and Spanakopita.  Should this be added? Alkwan (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food/Attractions, Access added. Intro cleaned up.
Talk:Phase Space (story collection)

message: ==Untitled==
There is a mathematical-scientific usage of the term "phase space", most notably used by Enrico Fermi to develop his theory of beta decay. Would it be possible to write a disambiguation for this? --24.84.203.193 5 July 2005 07:00 (UTC)
:It turns out the dab page was created, but nobody linked to the article in question. I'm fixing it now. --Viriditas  | Talk 07:27, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: There is a mathematical-scientific usage of the term "phase space", most notably used by Enrico Fermi to develop his theory of beta decay. Would it be possible to write a disambiguation for this? --24.84.203.193 5 July 2005 07:00 (UTC)
:It turns out the dab page was created, but nobody linked to the article in question. I'm fixing it now. --Viriditas  | Talk 07:27, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved the listing from the main article to talk.  It should be added back in as it is discussed or expanded, otherwise it serves no purpose. Text follows: --Viriditas  | Talk 07:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short story listing
Talk:David Schmidtz

message: A google search suggests that David Schmidtz is on the level and encyclopediable, in spite of this stub. --Wetman 5 July 2005 07:22 (UTC)
:He certainly is.  He also edited a collection of essays on Nozick.  I'll clean up and expand this page later.  --zenohockey 16:56, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Coupon

message: The "900 manufacturer's coupons per household" quote in the 2nd graf of the lede is from an AC Nielsen study done in 1980 (see source). If there isn't a more up-to-date source, this whole graf should be deleted because it's 40 years out of date.  2603:400A:0:7EC:0:0:801E:1C14 (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading quotation in lede 

message: I did not see anything "solid" in that article (expect maybe the anecdote about the first Coca-Cola coupon; charming).
It's all very vague. For instance, why don't you put in plain wording the explanation (I've seen it asked thousand of times on various chat sites, including by myself) about "Expiration date": is the last date mentioned INCLUDED or not as valid (spoiler: it IS, and that should be explained in the page)?
The other less asked, but definitely less answered concrete fact about coupons on the web is: are their use defined in laws of some countries (and are there penalties for bad-behaving businesses)?... Alainr345 AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 03:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legalese of coupons 

message: 103.55.98.68 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Irrelevant link. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 14:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2024
Talk:Politics of Liechtenstein

message: Its seems from the election data roughly that 199 000 people voted in Liechtenstein's last elections. According to wikipedia, Liechtenstein's population is only roughly 35 000 people. There has to be something very wrong! I checked the voting reference and it seems right. I also checked the population data from CIA world fact book and its is also correct. But one of the two has to be wrong. There can't be 600% election participation!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4rdi (talk • contribs) 23:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 35k population and 200k votes!

message: Why hasn't Liechtenstein joined the EU? -- Beland 5 July 2005 07:28 (UTC)
:Most probably down to having a tax favoured status like many smaller states including with foreign investment (Compare British Crown Dependancies such as Isle of Man, Gibralter etc. not to forget Switzerland!
:Why would they bother? They have one of the world's highest per capita incomes; the EU could offer them nothing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.169.226 (talk) 16:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion question

message: (Wikipedia newbie here..) The page could use some sources. Possibly off the official site of Liechtenstien? Fighthepain (talk) 02:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use sources... 

message: Here it says there'll be a referendum on the Prince's veto, and also that he (like his predecessor) has threatened to move abroad if his power is reduced. Bearing in mind the royal family's bank employs 1500 people, he is quite clearly using his financial clout to blackmail the electorate. At least according to the BBC. This should go in. Malick78 (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  referendum and financial clout of Prince
Wikipedia talk:As of version

message: Hi, I'm the creator of the As of version page. I thought this was a good idea so went ahead and implemented it. Hopefully now that I've got the ball rolling, someone else can dig in and get started. I understand some people hate "as of", but it's pretty logical, and hopefully it won't be deleted. Here's my rationale for the idea, as stated from the original "As of" talk page:
I was thinking we could add a second "as of" section for version numbers of software. New features are currently being added, and release dates are rarely annual events. What prompted me to suggest this is the GNU Compiler Collection has a section that begins with "GCC target processors (as of version 3.2) include:". Version 4.0 was released recently, and is similar in enormosity to the jump from windows 95 to windows XP SP2.
Keeping a software version "as of" list would help rein in the vastly out of date software entries and keep this rapidly changing information relatively up to date. I went ahead and created a prototype page at As of version.
Anyways, let me know what you think. Hadlock
:As of version sounds like a good idea in theory; however, this could quickly get out of hand. Consider:
:*Each program has its own version numbering system. One version 4.0 could be completely different from another. However, a year 2005 is generally regarded as being the same everywhere (that uses the Gregorian calendar).
:*We don't have articles on individual versions of most programs, while we have articles on almost every year we'd care for.
:æle ✆ 02:54, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A further problem: Wikipedia articles are not permitted to link to pages in the Wikipedia: namespace, even through redirects. I don't remember which policy covers this, offhand, but the idea is to separate and isolate the encyclopedia content from the "mechanics" of writing the encyclopedia. The as of version pages should not redirect to Wikipedia:As of version.--12.30.114.20 14:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

message: According to the most prestigious dictionaries e.g. 1, 2 "as of" means
"starting from a particular time or date and continuing".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.236.169 (talk) 04:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "As of"? Is it a good name?
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 21, 2005

message: Wikiproject cricket requests that The Ashes be featured today as July 21 is the start of the 2005 series. Thanks, =Nichalp «Talk»= July 5, 2005 07:30 (UTC)
:Thanks, Mark.
:And to Sam for his amendment - although I always thought the 1903/4 Ashes were particularly notable too:) jguk 18:50, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 7, 2005

message: Because these pages are reused at Portal:Featured content, please replace the redlink in this blurb with the free image :Image:India 78.40398E 20.74980N.jpg. Thanks. Carcharoth 14:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction. Geography of India is no longer a featured article, but the image should still be replaced (or the redlink removed) to maintain the appearance of the TFA archives. Carcharoth 14:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 15:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image replacement available
Talk:Aircraft parts industry

message: It seems to me that this personhas only created this article for the sake of creating an article. Perhaps it should be merged or deleted altogether. Nonetheless, I do not feel that this topic is or ever could be complete enough in it's scope to justify a whole article dedicated to it.  Andrew Graham 5/7/05 08.49 GMT
:I agree, having just cleaned up the spam links in this and read though it, it all looks like WP:OR to me. I propose redirecting it to Aircraft part. - Ahunt (talk) 14:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: With no objections for a week we now have a consensus to redirect this, which I will do. - Ahunt (talk) 17:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is pointless

message: This "article" to me qualifies for VoD IMHO Stu 21:51, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualifies for VoD
Talk:Order of Australia

message: Is there in Wikipedia a list of all awardees of the Order of Australia over the years ? -- PFHLai 18:59, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just go the list linked above, and count those who don't show a year of death.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 10:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: List of awardees

message: There's now a List of Companions of the Order of Australia.  --  JackofOz (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just go the list linked above, and count those who don't show a year of death.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 10:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: The lead sentence is
:The Order of Australia is an honour that recognises Australian citizens and other persons for achievement or meritorious service.
This is almost immediately contradicted in the infobox, by the omission of noncitizens:
:Eligibility
::	All living Australian citizens
--Thnidu (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Only citizens qualify for a substantive award. Non-citizens may be given an honorary award. So, both statements are correct. The honour does recognise "Australian citizens and other persons", but only citizens are "eligible". Non-citizens get their honorary award as an act of grace. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility contradiction 

message: Just putting this source here to look at later and potentially include in the article
* Taylor, G. (2020). Knighthoods and the Order of Australia. AUSTRALIAN BAR REVIEW, 49(2), 323–356. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20201201040511
Safes007 (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a way to access the full article? (It looks like an interesting read). Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 06:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future sources
Talk:Stoke

message: :Oppose. This is a big page that needs this suffix in its title to clarify it is a dis-ambiguation page, not a list. Georgia guy 5 July 2005 22:10 (UTC)
::It does not need the disambiguation suffix in the article title to make it a disambig page. The are many article that are disambig pages and all they have is the  template. Stoke would be an article that is a "list" of various seperate items which makes it a disambig candidate. Alan Liefting 6 July 2005 08:31 (UTC)
::: Yeah, that's a bad idea.  Stoke-on-Trent is the most important Stoke by far. Dunc|☺ 6 July 2005 10:48 (UTC)
::::That is an opinion. For me Stoke, New Zealand is more important. For the wider Wikipedia user entering Stoke should give all most important references to Stoke so that the likely choice can then be made. Alan Liefting 6 July 2005 20:48 (UTC) 
:::To clarify, I say it is a big dis-ambiguation page; specifically, one that is too large to reach the    template without scrolling. Georgia guy 6 July 2005 13:38 (UTC)
::::Obviously the disambiguation page would be limited to the more important references. Alan Liefting 6 July 2005 20:48 (UTC)
:::::Alan Liefting, can you clarify what the "most important references" means?? Georgia guy 6 July 2005 22:29 (UTC)
::::::Oops! You got me there! I have made some edits to the page as a general idea of what I mean. Moves such as a seperate Stokes disambig page and not listing every person with the name Sstoke are ways of avoiding a cluttered disambig page. Alan Liefting 8 July 2005 02:50 (UTC)
: I can't see any consensus for this move, so the result is not moved. Talrias (t | e | c) 19:46, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CAD/CAM

message: What is Computer Aided Manufacturing and Computer Aided Desing/Drawing used for? Also where are some exaples e.g. pictures of CAD and CAM drawings/designs?
Im not so sure this page needs editing, it links to the proper articles for each, instead of the abbreviations. if anything, it needs a simple redirect, but its a cross between two articles... perhaps if they were joined, as they are afterall related, this could link to them, other than that i would probably leave this alone... filling this article seems like duplication of existing data to me S3raph1m 16:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Well, CAD and CAM are very different from each other. CAD is 3d or 2d drawings or designs, while CAM is the control of robots or systems by the aid of a computer program. CAD design are most frequently used in the designs of houses in architecture, while CAM is often used to control the cars on a prodution line for example. For an example of CAM software, download the free software 'Google scetch up' which can be found on the google page. Examples of cam software is much harder to find however. Search CAD drawing examples in google images for some examples of models made in CAD. Hope this helps! Contact me @ fangaas@gmail.com for more assistance
As mentioned above, there are articles on CAD and CAM, no need to duplicate. Linked to CAx as this is more general term and can get to the other two from there Freeformer 01:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: The pair are used together in headlines and in articles, both within Wiki and elsewhere. Without merely copying from either the CAD or the CAM article, the idea is to explain the combined concept - which is about smoothely going from design to one-up and beyond. Pi314m (talk) 02:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why return of CAD/CAM