Talk:Total War (video game series)

message: Why is Spartan: Total Warrior on here? It has almost nothing to do with Total War apart from having the same makers. the gameplay is totally different. If we do leave it on, then why not include Viking: Battle for Asgard? It is the same but just doesn't have "Total" in the name...?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shogunapple (talk • contribs) 14:01, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be included, but under a heading of Spin offs along with Viking: Battle for Asgard, It should nothowever be under the main Total War Games. Rifleman jay (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spartan: Total Warrior?

message: There should be links for the expansion packs, they are different from the original games.
===Note===
Game titles are italised. Skinnyweed 01:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Packs 

message: Game titles are italised. Skinnyweed 01:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: I would like to re-add a link to Total War Center.  One existed but was removed by User:Wafulz with the explanation "Removing link per WP:EL".  While you could perhaps argue about whether major fansites should be linked from Wikipedia articles (it seems to me to be helpful), it seems kind of absurd to include totalwar.org but not the significantly larger twcenter.net (Alexa stats).  Either both should be removed or both in, it seems to me.
Note that I won't re-add them without a neutral third-party approving, because I'm an administrator at TWC (as well as a reasonably long-time Wikipedia editor). —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 04:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the other link per the guideline. I probably didn't see it the first time around. --Wafulz 04:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, okay.  WP:EL is kind of vague on the issue as I read it — "Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews" should presumably include game guides, lists of cheat codes, modification directories, and other things that fan sites will have — and WP:NOT mentions in an offhand way that "On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate, marking the link as such."  Looking at Wikipedia talk:External links#Fansitesthere seems to be an ongoing discussion on this.  I guess I'll discuss further there. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 18:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The second link has been removed. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 18:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to Total War Center 

message: :Image:Medieval2 cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a breif rationale.  Others may want to check that it is accurat and quailfies under WP:FU.  Eluchil404 23:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Medieval2 cover.jpg

message: Hey, Most of the total war series is missing 1 important picture. The picture is campagin map. Iam been looking for this sort of picture to be added in all total war series. Iam having no luck in finding that sort of pictures. Can anyone help?.--SkyWalker (talk) 08:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah me too what gives with that? Although the battles may be gamouras and exiting, personally I prefer the campagin part of the game. I can say the latest game (empire) will include the the tradional europe/north africa jobby along with armericas and india. But that does'nt beat an actul picture :/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.221.227.2 (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campagin map 

message: I just changed 'multiplayer world' to 'single player game' in the Shogun description as that made more sense. At the moment it implies that there was a multiplayer campaign with conversion to Christianity etc when in fact like the rest of the series (so far) multiplayer is restricted to one off battles. If I've misinterpreted the intention of this sentence, then change it back, but I think it is more correct now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.122.2.67 (talk) 11:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shogun Single Player? 

message: Why Spartan: Total Warrior is not mentioned in the article? It's a spinoff. --Mika1h (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spartan? 

message: Dose anyone know for sure if any or all of the games (except for Rome) will ever be put up for the Mac? Probably this question would be better somewhere else, but no one even mentions the Mac at all, let alone for an expansion. Yenrx (talk) 03:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: With the exception of Rome: Total War it is highly unlikely. The profit from games sold for apple computers is usually less than the cost of porting the game to said operating system. You'll only see a game be ported (let alone initially made for apple computers) if it has a major mainstream audience, specifically with people aged 18 to 26.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.10.25 (talk) 03:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mac 

message: It's not in any way related the total war series.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.218.31 (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete Spartan Total Warrior

message: As far as I know, the M:TW video card issue is now resolved. At least, M:TW works just fine on my PC(460 GTX card), but I'm not sure if people are still having issues with this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.0.253.76 (talk) 16:41, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medieval: Total War Compatibility 

message: Why dont they make a  game with Modern day armies? U.S, China, Russia, Germany, France, Canada, Britain. etc etc. IT would be perfect im not sure why they haven't.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.105.154 (talk) 09:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not modern day armies? 

message: I'm assuming it was placed there due to the absence of Total War: Three Kingdoms and Total War: Thrones of Britannia, both of which are now present. I'll go ahead and remove it. The Verified Cactus 100% 22:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Outdated" template no longer applies 

message: The link to main article just redirects back to the same section of this page.  If there isn't one the link should probably be removed. FusionTorch (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Kingdoms Total War Link 

message: Should the games be ordered chronologicaly as it always has been or should they be ordered by game engine version? Thrones of Britannia caused this problem.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShaDoW 03 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological order or by game engine?