lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Osteocyte

message: This article should tie Osteocytes to osteons. 08:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tie to osteon needed 

message: As a recent vandal pointed out, this page has no images... Whilst I am NOT about to sue wikipedia for 40,000 dollars unlike the other user, I have emailed the owner of some very nice Osteocyte photos on Flickr, and suggested opening up the license so that they can be added here...  --Tomhannen 08:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustrations Needed

message: Can someone take a look at the "Clinical Significance" section and improve it. Generally, Wikipedia should refrain from making subjective statements such as "very fascinating research". 
Additionally, the terminology of the section is extremely dense. I did not dedicate a tremendous amount of time to trying to understand it, but after reading it three times I still did not get what it was saying. I'm not sure if it's possible to make it more comprehensible to a lay-reader, but if someone with the medical background necessary to understand it is willing to take the time to re-word it, I think that would be an improvement.
50.26.225.7 (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Clinical Significance"
Talk:Charles Maclean, Baron Maclean

message: If Sir Fitzroy Donald Maclean died on 22 November 1936, and his son Charles Lachlan Maclean died on 27 Aug 1958 (as outlined on the wiki article for the former), how is it possible that "Sir Fitzroy had outlived his sons"?? Cornthwaite (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not say that Charles Lachlan Maclean was the son of Sir Fitzroy. He was his grandson, so the article is correct.--Bduke  (Discussion) 23:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No - Charles Lachlan Maclean ("CLM") was an uncle to the subject of this article, Charles Hector Fitzroy Maclean ("CHFM"). CHFM was indeed a grandson of Sir Fitzroy Donald Maclean ("FDM"); but, since according to the Wiki article on FDM ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Fitzroy_Maclean,_10th_Baronet), FDM died in 1926 while CLM died in 1958, FDM did NOT outlive his sons. Cornthwaite (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems you are correct. CLM was the second son. The title went to the son of the first son. -Bduke  (Discussion) 22:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Sir Fitzroy outlive his sons? 
Talk:The Four Feathers

message: The article keeps mentioning a 'British square' and the square being broken.  I'm assuming this is some sort of military term.  A little bit of explanation for the terminology like that would be helpful, though.  It's hard to know why the square being broken is a big deal without any hint as to what a square is, why is was used, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.216.160 (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The first use of the term is linked to the article Infantry square, which gives a detailed explanation. --Meyer (talk) 08:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  square? 

message: Reading the articles on the various films inspired by the novel, I note that the name of the main character (Harry Feversham) is nearly always given as Harry Faversham. Perhaps this should be mentioned in the section on the films. AstroLynx (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Feversham/Faversham
Talk:Roman provincial currency

message: I would like to work on the section, as the current section is only a stub.  I will add references from my library and try to bring this up to a professional level.  I will have a real user ID as soon as the system lets me register.  I modified the existing text to correct the text and remove factual errors. 24.164.57.247 10:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I would like to know why this was moved without a discussion Enlil Ninlil (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks mate, I do not care about the name, just the move. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 01:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The move was surely a mistake: the page could be at "Greek Imperial ..." or "Roman provincial ...", but not "Roman Imperial ..." -- that's something quite different, about which we have no separate article at present. "Roman provincial coinage" is the clearest name, and I propose to move to that if no one objects. Andrew Dalby 16:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.—Sowlos (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: "There are several cities which are only known by their coins, as there is no historical mention of them." - Alas, no reference(s) for this very intriguing tidbit of information. It would be nice to source this statement so similarly intrigued people could perhaps learn more elsewhere.--172.190.37.56 (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source?
Talk:Aksumite currency

message: Munro-Hay is a bit confusing here. He cites the end of SA coinage by the time of Aksum's minting era, yet he mentions the finding of Himyarite coins. Perhaps they're to be dated to an earlier date?
ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk 06:42, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They have Greek lettering because of trade! That does not equate to the influence in minting them in the first place 2A02:C7C:36FF:3600:6144:DD80:C1DF:620E (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences 

message: Axum Coinage seems like a very arbitrary name to me. Why not Aksumite Coinage or Coinage of Aksum? — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk 21:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was inserted by the person who began the article, [User:Enlil Ninlil|Enlil Ninlil]]. I believe he's trying to say that it was the first to be issued without direct infuence of an outside culture, unlike Egypt and (?) Carthage. It needs a source, though. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 14:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review.
There are still a few areas that could be improved. Some sections, like "Pre-Christian period" and "Decline", could be expanded and referenced. The structure of the article is altogether a bit confusing, and a separate "History" section, tracing the entire period in question, would help. Though referencing is good, it is virtually a single-source article (Munro-Hay); if other sources could be found that would help with reliability. There are two works (Coin comparison) cited at the bottom, and I assume they have been used for the "Weight standards" section, but this is not acknowledged with inline citations. Lampman (talk) 18:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Sweeps
Talk:Teil tree

message: this article leaves me completely in the dark on whether the name refers to Tilla, Terebinth, both, or whether the Bible scholars aren't really sure.
That makes it hard to insert proper backlinks.
:Exactly my reaction. The article apparently started as a copy from the Easton's Bible dictionary; the main point of the article (if any) is that if someone uses the expression "teil tree", you don't know what they're talking about. And that's my reason for opposing a merger - the fact that it's a confusing term is the only thing that's important to document about it, IMHO. --Alvestrand 22:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, if we don't know what tree it is, then obviously we don't know what to merge it with. Someone should probably change the first sentence though. —Keenan Pepper 01:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The OEDictionary gives the etymology of teil as Latin tilia and Old French (13-15th c.) til. In Modern French it is tilleul. The French and Latin word cognates appeared amongst the English literate classes starting in the 14th century. Most names of trees, however, kept their Germanic origins, hence linden and lime (a deformation of lind according to the OED). The linden or til tree is native to northern Europe and Asia. Next, the OED gives the terebinthe as a tree native to southern Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East and as a source of a particularly valued turpentine. Next time you are in the dark about words, might I suggest you do what we old folks do. Go to the library and look up their meanings and especially their origins. If this is too inconvenient, get an on-line subscription to a dictionary, but whatever you do, don't rely too much on wikipedia. I might be lying to you.Laburke (talk) 23:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusing content
Talk:William A. Johnson Jr.

message: In my original stub for this article I stated what I had read on the City of Rochester's web site:
:Johnson ... is notable as one of the few African-American mayors of a predominantly white city.
I've since read this statement in other places, though his biography seems to have been removed from the city's web site since the new mayor took office.
An anonymous user removed the statement from the Wikiperdia stub, saying Rochester is not predominantly white.  I looked up Rochester's demoraphics in Wikipedia and saw that indeed, the majority of people in Rochester are non-white.  The 2000 census showed 48.3% White, 38.55% African American, and the rest were much smaller minorities.
I guess the question is "what does predominant mean?"  In this case non-whites are predominant, but they don't constitute a single race or ethnic group, so we could say that Whites make up the predominant group.  We could however say that African Americans are not predominant.
Should we say:
:Johnson ... is notable as one of the few African-American mayors of a predominantly non-African-American city?
That may not even be true.  There could be a number of African-American mayors of a predominantly Hispanic citys.
I guess some research and convincing are in order before I put anything back in the article concerning this particular point.  Nonenmac 04:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harry Ainlay High School

message: https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=T_9kAAAAIBAJ&sjid=NoINAAAAIBAJ&pg=1888%2C2354351
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=zu1kAAAAIBAJ&sjid=KoINAAAAIBAJ&pg=1029%2C112931
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=LPhkAAAAIBAJ&sjid=94ENAAAAIBAJ&pg=5749%2C4211554
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Au9kAAAAIBAJ&sjid=B4INAAAAIBAJ&pg=2769%2C3765716
-- 01:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've been collecting mentions of this school from newspaper articles
Talk:Hazard, Kentucky

message: What does this refer to? Right now the link points to a disambiguation page for Black Gold.
-Crunchy Numbers 16:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  annual Black Gold Festival 

message: Rebecca Gayheart - Actress was born in Hazard  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.194.128.7 (talk) 19:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable natives and residents 

message: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2021/10/27/kentucky-high-schools-man-pageant-lap-dances-being-investigated/8571054002/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.127.133.181 (talk) 15:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent scandal
Talk:Rastatt (district)

message: District vs. County vs. Burough
It seems that in many of the articles covering German Geography the term District is used to mean County (Kreis) as well as Burough (Stadtteil).  It would help if we called Kreise or Landkreise Counties, Stadtteile Buroughs, and leave District to mean other types of regional conconctions such as, for instance, Verwaltungsbezirk.  What do you think?  Mmounties 04:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:WMMR

message: Could someone familiar with this station take a look at this diff and other edits made by the same person. I inadvertently rolled back too far in getting rid of the "dolt" edit. Now fixing. --Surgeonsmate 04:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah pretty much i would say it's vadalism, the dolt comment is pure and simple, as for the other name changes, even if that is their real full name, which i cant say one way or the other, it not what they go as with the on air profile, which is what the listing was prior to the edits, and what the schedule listing should be. Aslo considering that that Presont and Steve change changed the name, and Preston and steve is the name of the morning show, uless something has changed in the past couple of days. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 05:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Seems like there should be some mention of the Planet Tierson in there somewhere. --Rpresser 13:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tierson
Talk:Constitution of Washington

message: 71 of 75 members of the Washington Constitutional convention signed the 1889 constitution on 8/22/89.   The constitution also overwhelmingly prevailed in the popular vote on 10/1/89 with 40,152 in favor and 11,879 against.  This constituion satisfied the Enabling Act passed by the US Congress and approved by the President.  A few might call that "conspiracy" but most would call it "democracy."
The 1871 constitution was ignored by the US congress.  The article is simply wrong to say that Washington has two constitutions and that the second constitution was not ratified.  The secondary historical literature has never varied on the numbers or process.  The conspiracy theory may deserve a separate page, but I think the genesis of the theory only dates from the late 20th century.  --Joe L.
This page is rather POV, and needs to be either cleaned up or deleted.  For example, the terms "phony" and "authentic", and the lack of statements of the contrary perspective.
RossPatterson 04:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is poorly written. --Mboverload 05:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article in present form does not, in my opinion, come anywhere close to qualifying for inclusion in an encyclopedia. I would suggest that the creator of this article go back and look for some actual legal authority -- some case law to back up the claims in the article. "Case law" means verbatim re-prints of actual court decisions. In the absence of legal authority, the assertions in the article would be just some private individual's opinion. Famspear 19:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary on Washington State Constitution

message: I've copied some material out of secstate.wa.gov, which is hopefully more reliable than whatever the ruckus was about above.
Still missing are discussions of the constitution's contents, amendments, and legal history. Melchoir (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article filled out
Talk:AVALANCHE

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 09:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Why does the link for Cait Sith redirect to his Celtic orgins and not the character himself? Anyone on a page about AVALANCHE and finds a link to a character would not be wanting the link to the orgin of the name or word and instead want the character himself. But instead of just changing the link myself I want to make sure this wasn't something I did not know about. So any reason it is like the way it is, anyone opposed to moving it to the character? J-Axe
:It's quite simple to DAB the link yourself, you know...—ウルタプ 05:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cait Sith? 

message: Note that the only known AVALANCHE members in FFVII (ie., those specifically indicated as part of the group) are Barret, Tifa, Biggs, Wedge, and Jessie.  One can only assume that Marlene is much too young to be considered a member.  Cloud is hired as a mercenery assistant for two missions, but it's never made clear if this means he is considered a full member.  (The second mission, of course, goes horribly wrong but fortuitously results in his meeting Aerith, without which the planet would never have been saved.)  The deaths of Biggs, Wedge, and Jessie reduce the roll call to two known and one possible.  Later, in Cosmo Canyon, Barret declares that AVALANCHE is "born again", but it is not certain whether this means all party members should be considered members of this third AVALANCHE or not.
So, from a very loose interpretation, every main party member as well as Reeve might be considered AVALANCHE members; or, from a very strict interpretation, taken only from what we are specifically told, the only surviving members of AVALANCHE are Barret and Tifa.  Kasreyn 02:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AVALANCHE members
Talk:Kilkelly

message: Should there be a separate article for the song? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.51.77.64 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 25 January 2006  (UTC)
:If anyone can figure out, from the suggestions in the song, what happened to "John," there should be a separate article for the song.  My guess is that he became involved in dishonorable dealings and was too ashamed to face his family.  Any guesses?Llama (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article for the song
Talk:Arturo Montiel

message: Removed nickname add by anon. Mikereichold 04:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rata 

message: His death has not been confirmed by reliable sources, and the source provided in the history page (which shouldn't have been there only in the first place), says the contrary.  , tagging both of you because I reverted the updates you guys made. MX (✉ • ✎) 15:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake, I misread what you said TDKR Chicago 101. I thought you were reverting the death date back. MX (✉ • ✎) 18:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumored death
Talk:Hugo Chávez

message: Why the "sic" in the spanish word "llanero"? The spelling is correct... - Joaquin89uy (talk) 21:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Llanero (sic) 

message: One of the sections I created at the Talk part was deleted. Why? Vintaquar (talk) 03:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely, it got archived automatically. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted section
Talk:Maldita Vecindad

message: What is meant by "Amnesia by Inspector"?  Inspector is another Rock en Espanol band.  Did la Maldita collaborate?  And Cafe Tacvba too?  Seems like a lot of collaborators...  Thx.--Rockero420 05:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: When the autor cite Roco's inspiration being chicana he is wrong and an even bigger mistake is to say Tin Tan is also chicano. Both Roco's inspiration and Tin Tan are pachucos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterLoki (talk • contribs) 03:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pachuco is NOT Chicano
Talk:Ruhnama

message: why don't you add this website for ruhnama : www.ruhnama.info
it has this book in 4 languages available online! Great resource for Ruhnama
Yeah, I just followed that link. Good God, Niyazov is a terrible writer. K. Lastochka 16:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One wonders why dictators don't just focus on enjoying their power. If this story wasn't so incredibly tragic, it would be comic. Valentinian (talk) 00:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is comical, in a bitter, sad, Russian-novel sort of way. All the world's a stage, and I think we're all acting in a farce. K. Lastochka 14:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Ruhnama, (or The Book of the Soul from Arabic: روح rūḥ (soul) and Persian: نامه nāmeh (book)) is Turkmenbashi Saparmurat Niyazov's combination of autobiography, historical fact, and spiritual guidebook".  First of all, I am not sure, but is calling him 'Turkembashi' itself a sign of bias, or is this title neutral ?   Second, and most importantly, this book is being described as a combination of 2 parts pure fact (autobiography, historical fact) and 1 part, at least presumably, respectable spirituality.  This is unacceptable -- that this work contains any significant quantity of historical fact is debatable and if 'historical fact' is not to be removed then at least terms like 'revisionist history', 'historical fiction', etc. should be added in
Mercmisfire 00:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Problem 

message: IRIN report on impact of Ruhnama on education, in External links, links at a wrong page. I did not find on the internet the correct one. It's correct to report this issue here?
Thanks
Andrea  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea Vergnano (talk • contribs) 22:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link broken
Talk:Australian International Airshow

message: No mention of the noise complaints by effected residents is made in this article. Some residents of distant suburbs find the noise intolerable and question the parentage of those involved. 122.151.99.95 (talk) 03:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noise complaints 
Talk:Interstitial cell of Cajal

message: Just wondering what "ventricle" is being talked about in the article. Tristanb 08:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a separate wikipage on telocytes, which are the exact same cell type.  I propose that that page be merged into this one. Skingski (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the grounds that equivalence is contested. My view is that it is better to keep the pages separate for now, but to link them better, unless there is a very clear review article that states that there is a consensus on their equivalence. Klbrain (talk) 22:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 June 2021