Talk:Fulla (doll)

message: This article requires some pictures.  I actually found some pictures, so:
*Could someone please upload this picture?
*this picture
*this picture
*this picture
*this picture
*and this picture?
I know it this is a large amount of pictures, but it would really improve the quality of this article!  By the way, once they're uploaded, I'll put the appropriate copyright tags and put them in the right place with captions.  Thanks in advance! --71.118.87.141 01:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: What about mention of Fulla's brother and sister - Badar and Nour, her friends Nada and the other one, and what the names translate into in english. 04:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brother and Sister

message: Good article. Minor problem of mantaining real-world context though, so fix that up some.--SeizureDog 21:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Passed 

message: I looked on the official Fulla site, the one that has a link at the bottom of the article, and found out that it is indeed NewBoy without a space: http://fullafulla.tripod.com/id6.html Tikallover 06:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Boy or NewBoy?

message: The current article uses the terms Muslim and Arab interchangeably, which seems terribly incorrect. And I agree with Bravada's analysis above, even after 71.105.3.234's changes; it still reads as if it's pushing the conservative-Muslim POV, and has a lot of bald assertions that would be better phrased as paraphrased quotes: for example, "Barbie has a boyfriend, but Fulla doesn't and never will." would be better as "Joe Cool, the marketing director of FullaCorp International (or whoever), says that Fulla will never have a boyfriend." (And BTW, that's mentioned twice in the current article, in two different sections.) --Quuxplusone 06:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Barbie is a JEWISH doll??? Says who? Just goes to show how perverted the thinking is in certain parts of the world (which will go unmentioned, in the interests of political correctness).
--Gilabrand 14:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably, because her designer Ruth Handler was Jewish. Muad (talk) 03:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are Jews incapable of creating non-Jewish characters or dolls?  Does that rule apply to all other religions and cultures as well? Randyest (talk) 01:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Muslim" v. "Arab" 

message: The quote included in the article actually reads, according to the referenced source:
"Jewish Barbie dolls, with their revealing clothes and shameful postures, accessories and tools are a symbol of decadence to the perverted West. Let us beware of her dangers and be careful"
Why was "Jewish" omitted in this article? Whether it makes the original authors look good or bad should not be the concern of this Wikipedia page. 
It seems to me that by deliberately omitting "Jewish", or offering any indication to the reader that it's an edited quote - embarrassing antisemitism is being hidden, depriving the reader of valid context. And that's not Wikipedia's job.  
I say the quote should be restored to its original, as cited on the referenced page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.99.196.211 (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word "Jewish" removed from the 'Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice' quote? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fulla (doll). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108100924/http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data%2Ftodaysfeatures%2F2005%2FNovember%2Ftodaysfeatures_November54.xml§ion=todaysfeatures to http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data%2Ftodaysfeatures%2F2005%2FNovember%2Ftodaysfeatures_November54.xml§ion=todaysfeatures
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I have restored the non-free image in the infobox.  All of the other images are from Commons and are not properly licensed.  Although the photos are released under a free license, the photo is of a copyrighted work (the doll), and as such, is not free.  I have also removed the other images for the same reason.  See c:COM:TOYS. -- Whpq (talk) 13:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This has also happened with Barbie. All of the photos of the doll on Commons get deleted because they are considered to be derivatives of copyrighted works.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

text: I had a look at this and it is basically a gallery of images. It probably isn't suitable as an external link, per WP:EL.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images and licensing 

message: The redirect Fulla (doll has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 21:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Fulla (doll]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]