Talk:Nauru Regional Processing Centre

message: According to , there were just 2 asylum seekers left in November 2005 --Fred Bradstadt 22:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061007212644/http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf to http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121021202533/http://bigpondnews.com/articles/National/2012/09/19/Work_needed_on_Nauru_detention_centre_796519.html to http://bigpondnews.com/articles/National/2012/09/19/Work_needed_on_Nauru_detention_centre_796519.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070326011637/http://www.oxfam.org.au:80/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf to http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Nauru Regional Processing Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070326011637/http://www.oxfam.org.au:80/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf to http://www.oxfam.org.au/campaigns/refugees/pacificsolution/adriftinthepacific_OCAA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I added a paragraph on the current conditions based upon a primary source. That source has been removed and a new section created discussing media access. While some of the points I listed from the primary source are mentioned, not all are, and the source itself is ignored in favour of a non-primary source that contradicts the original article. I was under the impression Wikipedia preferred original\primary sources? I don't want to see an edit war started so rather than do anything now I'll just raise the points here. I do think something needs to be added to the conditions section as the impression a reader is left with is that conditions are very very bad, which contradicts the latest report. 人族 (talk) 03:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conditions v Access 

message: A story about conditions here aired on NPR's Morning Edition this morning. Part 2 is tomorrow.
Several other sources have come out about it in the last couple weeks, too: SMH, BBC, Guardian, NY Times... — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources