lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Viper-class destroyer

message: The Chilean Navy site lists 6 "Clase Viper, austríaca" (austriaca=austrian?) ships and the photo mutilla (2 funnels) shows a different ship siloutte than HMS Viper (1899) (3 funnels). 
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090710/pags/20090710184656.html hyatt
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090710/pags/20090710184052.html videla
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090710/pags/20090710215118.html rodriguez
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090709/pags/20090709230633.html contreras
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090710/pags/20090710000043.html mutilla 
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090710/pags/20090710212839.html mutilla (rep.)
* http://www.armada.cl/prontus_armada/site/artic/20090804/pags/20090804134312.html thomson
Can anyone says any thing about this "Clase Viper, austríaca"?. --Best regards, Keysanger (what?) 18:49, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Viper class in the Chilean Navy?
Talk:BR Standard Class 6/Archive 1

message: This article seems to contradict itself re the 'success' or otherwise of this class of locomotives and cites 'popular opinion' in the assessment. Following his interview with the Standard 6 class designer R A Riddles, Col HCB Rogers states in his book "Transition from Steam" (Ian Allen ISBN 0 7110 1014 5) that "...Riddles believes that his Class 6 Pacific was a mistake, and that had he made it a 4-8-0 the extra adhesion would have provided a solution to traffic problems in Scotland". If the designer is saying this sort of thing then surely this would point toward a lack of success?
I believe also the statement on the building of a number of replicas of these locos is incorrect. If the source for this is the link to the Swanage railway article then this must have been misread as this states an aim of rebuilding one each of those Standard classes that are missing from the ranks of those preserved - including Class 6 No 72010 Hengist - unless anyone knows different? Andywebby 01:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:BR Standard Class 6/Archive 2

message: In the Background section we are plunged in at the deep end as though there were already an ongoing discussion - unfortunately not the case.... I know very little about this side of the story, so I cannot help much here. What I understand from Brian Haresnape's "Profile" is that there was an initial Pacific programme in four power groups - 8, 7, 6, and 5. The only Cass 8 built was the "Duke", considered as a replacement for for the destroyed "Princess Anne", and the 5 was dropped because it was felt that a 4-6-0 answered all needs - so that made two production models wiith one not perpetuated beyond the first batch. All this needs to be expanded upon. Perhaps there is room for an article on the thinking behind the whole BR standandisation programme of the late 40s, culminating in all these new designs. Anybody fancy taking it on?--John of Paris 08:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, from the information I have to hand (the Clarke book), what you have suggested is correct, but  I think that they may have wished to create a locomotive with a greater route availability in terms of distance than the 4-6-0, though the problem you have highlighted was more than likely one of the key considerations in precluding the construction of a class of such locomotives, as the power-weight ratio would have been on the high side.  Another was the fact that there was no real need for a 'Pacific' of 5MT power classification, due to the fact that the 4-6-0 was seen to be good enough for BR's needs, a case of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" (as you rightly mention above).  However, they believed that there was still a need for a slightly higher power classification for use on routes that were otherwise barred to 7MTs, hence the decision to go ahead with the Std. Class 6 (which was a fairly obvious outcome).--Bulleid Pacific 14:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: May help to clear up some issues.  There also needs to be an article on the Railway Executive, one step below the BTC.--Bulleid Pacific 12:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Background: 5MT Pacifics
Talk:CMRS

message: CMRS should not automatically redirect to American Indoor Air Quality Council
Should be a disambiguation page.  Other abbreviations for CMRS include:
Certified Mold Remediation Supervisor, certification by American Indoor Air Quality Council
Clinical Magnetic Resonance Society
Certified Medical Reimbursement Specialist
Commercial Mobile Radio Service
Jc3 13:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Asiatic Squadron

message: this article seems biased. the words "destroy" and "effectively" hint at this bias. while changing these words may remove the impression of bias, this will not actually remove the bias.  61.80.41.26 13:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the bias.  Can you explain further?  To me "destroy" is a fairly objective term and something that militaries do.  Similarly, how is "effectively control" biased?  Would "de facto" be better than "effectively"?  "Effective" is just a qualifier to mean that they did neither officially or legally controlled, at least in my mind.  Certainly if anyone sees bias they should be bold and correct the bias.  --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Seems biased

message: Missing are operational details abou the squadron, such as where it was based and what its strength was. The article would benefit from such information. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Operational details
Talk:Samogitian nobility

message: This article should be a part of Lithuanian nobility because  Vytautas diplomatic game certainly defined ethnic borders and affiliation  of Lithuanians. hence taggign again. Please do not remove this tag without a proper consensus and references.--Lokyz (talk) 05:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This was discussed above as merge, and no consensus for merge was reached. Please don't use other tags when the primary failed. If  you want, you can suggest this article for WP:AFD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A proper WP:RM procedure was not started, hence it the move is in sight.--Lokyz (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithuanian nobility
File talk:Mists of Dawn 1st Edition Dust Jacket.jpg

message: Image will be used in Mists of Dawn article which is in process in my user namespace. See fair use description on image page. FusionKnight 13:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article moved to main namespace. FusionKnight 15:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned fair use image
Talk:Lisle C. Carter

message: Please have more than one source so that the information presented is verifiable. Simply relying on a newspaper makes the article unreliable. --JustBerry (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: No reliable source found as of yet provide any specific details of his army service, such as specific dates served and locations. There are mentions that he served two years in the army without any details. Online collections searched are Google, Newspapers.com by Ancestry, NewspapersArchive.com and Fold3 by Ancestry. Fold3 has a DSS Form 1 Draft Registration Card dated November 18, 1943 completed while at Dartmouth College. Fold3 also has a transcribed "Index Record for Lisle C Carter Jr WWII Army Enlistment Records", which appears to be partially complete, but contains an "Enlistment Date: August 30, 1944" and an "Army Serial Number: 42179768". This enlistment date may be while he was still at Dartmouth College as he is listed as Class of 1945. I have removed "Category:United States Army personnel" from the article until a defining role in the army is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Army service
Talk:Doora, County Clare

message: As written, the Civil Parish section comes before the Village section. It would seem to me, after reading Civil parishes in Ireland and (yikes!) Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland#Civil_parishes_vs_villages, that the Village is the more recent and relevant of the two, and thus should be discussed first in the article. This would also align with the lead.
On a related note, I found this article to be interesting, but failed to illuminate why the Civil Parish vs. Village issue is even raised. Reading Civil parishes in Ireland made it even less clear. I believe the discussion of the differences (as well as others, such as RC parishes) in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland#Civil_parishes_vs_villages was more enlightening (albeit aggravating due to the infighting) than in Civil parishes in Ireland. Perhaps some of you experts in this area could improve that article?
Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 22:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Joe. You may well be right about the need for a re-write. Re the order - I've no particular preferences. Laurel Lodged (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever has the most prominence of the two entities should have preference as far as I am aware. Mabuska (talk) 10:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

text: *The question is academic since there is no village called Doora. There are a few newish-looking houses around the church in Noughval townland, and a few other strings of houses, presumably for people who work in Ennis, but nothing that could be called a village in the sense of having a pub or a shop. This is just a civil parish in the south of the much larger Catholic parish of Doora Barefield. I have put name and location first, then antiquities, catholic parish and sports (sequence is arbitrary) and then townlands. There are too many small sections, but I can't see a good way to combine them. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which should come first in the article - Civil Parish section or Village section? 

message: The article could use more pictures. One that could be use twice would be of the ruined Doora Church.
I am not sure how easy it is to get to though, since it seems to be cut off by newly-built houses. 
If it could be reached, a walk across the fields about 200m to the northwest would reach what is left of the hamlet of Doora, which I think is at . It does not look like much from the air, but may be interesting from ground level. Any other pictures of communities, landmarks or landscapes in the parish would be useful for a gallery. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Loop Head

message: Can I add this link to external links http://www.360eire.com/360eire/Mumhan/ContaeanChlair/CeannLeime/CeannLeime.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dialinn (talk • contribs) 23:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panorama View 
Talk:History of Fairfax, Virginia

message: DGG proposed to merge this article with another one...which one, and why? JeremyBoggs 13:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: PMDrive1061 proposed to delete this article because it appeared to be a copy under an implausible title. Where is the original? And, is the implausible title attributed to "History" being misspelled? JeremyBoggs 13:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion Proposal
Talk:Calendar and Contacts Server

message: "it is currently possible to install it on FreeBSD and several flavours of Linux."
And yet after more than a year there are no distribution packages, there are some HOWTO's"
FreeBSD HOWTO:  http://www.tnpi.net/wiki/Darwin_Calendar_Server
Linux HOWTO:  http://www.nabble.com/'Run'-script-crashes-t4025360.html
: The packages for Ubuntu and Debian are called 'calendarserver'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raboof (talk • contribs) 21:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Production quality
Talk:Hadith of The Cloak

message: This Article is a stub!!!!!!!!!>...The person who wrote does not have sufficient knowledge...no offense!!!!!!!!!
Firstly an article related to the Hadis of Cloak and the event already exists on wikipedia!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadith_of_the_Event_of_the_Cloak
Secondly....The person confused two distinct events into a single event!!!!The Hadis of Cloak and The Wakia of Mubahila!!!!
The Hadis of clock occured on 3rd Hijra acording to some records, while some people say its 5 Hijra...However!!! I believe the correct is about 7 or 8 Hijra!!!!!!!!as both Imam Hussan (RA) and Hussain (RA) came walking to Their mother Fatima (RA)....and the Imam Hassan (RA) was born on 2nd Hijra, while Imam Hussain (RA) born on 3rd Hijra....
Irrespective of the date when it occured....the two events are separate and different!!!
The second event of Mubahila occured on 2th Zil Hajja, 10 Hijra. An article for this event also already exists!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mubahila
DaDexter 13:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rick Brebant

message: Maybe 5'10" with your skates on, Rick?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnycigarettes (talk • contribs) 17:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 
Talk:Immanuel J. Klette

message: We need far better sourcing. I found this  but I have my doubts it passes GNG. I am less than convinced that Klette meets any inclusion criteria. Not every pilot is notable, and I am not seeing anything that indicates that Klette is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need better sourcing
Talk:Sliabh Luachra

message: I've heard of Sliabh Luachra all my life, but after reading this article I still can't for the life of me locate the place on a map in my head (if you understand!). We need some visual of where Sliabh Luachra is. 109.76.135.231 (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Need a map

message: Is Irish still the native language of areas here? If so, where? 79.97.154.238 (talk) 21:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish?

message: The text that says this has some confusion:
An tAthair Padraig Duinnin, who compiled Dineen's Dictionary, viewed as the "bible" of Irish language, and An Bráthair Tomás Rathaille, Superior General of the Presentation Brothers 1905–1925 who wrote two books of Irish poet
What word is the tAthair?
Robert (talk) 21:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the Irish form of address to a priest, equivalent to 'Father'. He is usually referred to as 'Dineen' in English language texts, and per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles#Naming people, the Irish form should not be used here. RashersTierney (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited accordingly (note also WP:HONORIFIC). RashersTierney (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about text
Talk:Carrigrohane Straight

message: I've seen this road (or area?) referred to as the Carrigrohane Strait. Any ideas on this? --Tóraí (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google search reveals that only the Irish Independent seems to use the term, everyone else uses Straight. ww2censor (talk) 07:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrigrohane Strait
Talk:Interstitial webpage

message: The easiest way to cite your sources is to put the web page address between two "ref tags", like URL address. right after the text you add. See Help:Footnotes. --Busy Stubber 13:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing sources

message: More needs to be said in this article about this phenomenon that is becoming so widespread.  That fact that those that employ them are defensive about them should be a clue that they are a threat. Extensive information about how to thwart them should be added to the article or maybe even a separate article just on that should be created (without interstitials).Godofredo29 (talk) 07:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Interstitials Are Evil

message: Tt 170.51.50.140 (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yofj
Talk:Geology of Chile

message: Here I propose a new outline for the article. I think the geological history section can be errased for now, it too incomplete and gives a erroneous view of the events that have shaped the geology of Chile.  
*Geology (includes general morphology and key events)
**Far north (Peruvian border-Copipó)
**Near north  (Copiapó-Aconcagua)
**Central zone (Aconcagua river-Biobío)
**Southern zone (Biobío-Wellington Island)
**Magallanes (Wellington Island-to the south)
**Pacific Islands (Easter I., Sala y Gomez, Juan Fernández I., I. Desventuradas.)
*Economic geology
**Mining
**Geothermal energy
**Tourism
*Geological hazards
**Earthquakes
**Volcanism
**Massmovements
-Dentren | Talk 11:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, I think this is a very good outline. I'm curious though which parts of the geological history are wrong. (I didn't write any of it, but it is interesting.) - Ruodyssey (talk) 05:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't that a particular piece of information is wrong but currently the history is too patchy, jumping from one event in one epoch in the north to another event in the south in another epoch. It is like having a history of South America article begining with Incas, the jumping to Cabral's discovery of Brazil, and then to the May Revolution and then to the 19th century economy of Colombia and Venezuela. Dentren | Talk 08:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New outline

message: The article Seismicity of the Chilean coast would be better if it considered all seismicity in the whole country and not only the coasts one, in that sense it would belong better in Geology of Chile until it has grown to be a good article byt its own.Dentren | Talk 15:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This could be a good lead-in for the Earthquakes subsection proposed above and/or summary for Earthquakes in Chile. - Ruodyssey (talk) 03:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Drummond Money-Coutts

message: . . . . 'a visit by Uri Geller, from whom he learned how to bend spoons' . . . 
Err - so it's a conjuring trick?
89.168.84.197 (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Geller's spoonbending

message: This article is very promotional in tone and content. There are huge amounts of uncited content and assertions. I have cleaned up the article and removed uncited content. The tone needs to be changed throughout to a more disinterested tone in keeping with NPOV guidelines.Sazp1985 (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go a bit further toning down the promotional aspects.ItsRainingCatsAndDogsAndMen (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtly Promotional Article
Talk:Competitive Lotka–Volterra equations

message: The Kondoh 2003 paper and the Ackland & Gallagher 2004 paper both model the evolution of Lotka-Volterra foodweb (predator-prey) dynamics, not LV competition.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.206.7.16 (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Kondoh and Ackland & Gallagher papers 

message: Now, it says they are "a simple model of the population dynamics of species competing for some common resource" (my italics). This is an error. The model is a phenomenological model of competition, in that they model the phenomenon of competition, and not the underlying mechanisms that bring it about. The equations might as well model interference competition, e.g. direct interaction through aggression. And more importantly, if they model resource competition, in general it is competition for several resources, not just a single one. This is a important distinction, as several important results, where the Lotka-Volterra equations where derived from models with explicit resources, one of which due to Alfred Lotka himself, show that sustained coexistence is not possible when competition is for a single resource. OpenScience (talk) 12:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do the equations model?
Talk:Valparaíso Region

message: This article is a mishmash of unsupported data, wishful thinking and straight inventions. 
--146.155.241.174 (talk) 17:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: The section on Demographics is based on erroneous factual data, lacking in evidentiary support. Population figures should be based on the most recent census data available (which in this case is the very recent and comprehensive 2017 census). Instead, the article cites "estimates", that do grossly exaggerate the true population figures of the cities involved - by 100% at the very least. Other paragraphs are plainly figments of imagination. 
Wikipedia articles should be encyclopedic in content and tone and not derived from someone's conjectures or wishful thinking. 
200.12.130.226 (talk) 15:53, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Lee Smith (film editor)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Magellan (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 24#Magellan (film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Onel5969 TT me 12:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Magellan (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Iquique

message: HORA         	LUNES	MARTES	MIÉRCOLES	JUEVES	VIERNES	SÁBADO	DOMINGO
08:00- 08:40 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
08:41- 09:20 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
09:30 – 10:10	     	      	         	      	       	      	
10:11 – 10:50	     	      	         	      	       	      	
11:00- 11:40 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
11:41 – 12:20	     	      	         	      	       	      	
12:30- 13:10 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
13:11- 13:50 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
13:51 – 14:30	     	      	         	      	       	      	
15:00 -15:40 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
15:41 – 16:20	     	      	         	      	       	      	
16:30 – 17:10	     	      	         	      	       	      	
17:11 – 17:50	     	      	         	      	       	      	
18:00- 18:40 	     	      	         	      	       	      	
18:41 – 19:20	     	      	         	TAC-004
PRA
102	       	      	
19:20 – 20:00	     	FGL-300
CAT
TEAMS 16	         	TAC-004
PRA
102	       	      	
20:00- 20:40 	IMIS033
CAT
502	FGL-300
CAT
TEAMS 16	         	TAC-002
PRA
535	       	      	
20:41 -21:20 	IMIS033
CAT
502	      	         	TAC-002
PRA
535	       	      	
21:30 – 22:10	TAC-004
CAT
438	      	         	      	FGL-303
CAT
502	      	
22:11- 22:50 	TAC-004
CAT
438	      	         	      	FGL-303
CAT
502	      	
23:00- 23:40 	TAC-003
PRA
ELECTRON	      	         	      	FGL-303
CAT
502	      	
23:41- 00:20 	TAC-003
PRA
ELECTRON	      	         	      	       	      	
152.173.27.170 (talk) 00:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  horario Cleiton ruiz
Talk:Minutemen discography

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Strong oppose as unnecessary disambiguation. Red Slash 18:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: In the American Underground section of the December 1982 edition of Trouser Press, there is a review of this EP on the Thermidor label (cat. no. T8). However,. it is not listed here.
Nomadic Tribesman (talk) 23:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Likely Bean-Spill (Thermidor T8) mislabeled, as a five-track EP from 1982? Though "We need the money" might be in relation to The Punch Line czar 20:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  We Need the Money EP