lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samantha: An American Girl Holiday

message: The Plot length is WAY to long. Someone needs to fix it. i would but i have never seen the movie so i dont know what is the 'major' plot lines are.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.162.11.146 (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Holy hell I don't think I've ever seen a plot summary that long before, especially for a movie made for kids. I just restored it to a previous version that's only two paragraphs and keeps it simple and to the point. --132 22:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot length

message: To whoever it may concern, I'am a huge fan of american girl series, but my favorite american girl is samantha because she is just like me. I'am nice and kind. And i love reading books just like samantha. So, please keep samantha parkington because many girls not just me, love samantha. I hope you agree, and i hope you will reconsider. Thank you. From,a 12 year old. My name is sandra.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.171.223.176 (talk) 04:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep samantha parkington.
Talk:Hethersett

message: Much of this article had been cut-and-pasted from the Hethersett website.  I have removed the text in question. Shimeru 07:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Parallelism (rhetoric)

message: Should not be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.31.195.252 (talk) 01:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

message: The general rhetoric effect of parallelism should be mentioned in there somewhere, or the article should be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.16.65.43 (talk) 00:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Effect?

message: I strongly recommend against merging Parallelism (rhetoric) with Parallelism (grammar) because they are two separate concepts.  The grammatical concept deals primarily phrase agreement and sentence structure, whereas the rhetoric pages addresses the paragraph scale and another type of parallelism as a whole.Jackson Peebles (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have to agree with Jackson, above.  Rhetorical Parallelism and Grammatical Parallelism are different subjects.  Rhetorical Parallelism is concerned with the balancing of concepts to create a flow of like ideas.  Grammatical Parallelism is about with ensuring that sentences with two or more parts have their parts in a similar form.cruinne (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: "We charge him with having broken his coronation-oath—and we are told that he kept his marriage given up his people to the merciless inflictions of the most hard-hearted of prelates—and the defense is that he took his little son on his knee and kissed him. We censure him for having violated the Petition of Right—and we are informed that he was accustomed to hear prayers at six o'clock in the morning." (Macaulay) 
“Veni, vidi, vici (I came, I saw, I conquered [Note that the past tense of the verbs are also parallel, although they can't be bolded since the past forms of each verb are different in English.]).” (Julius Caesar)
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessing; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." (Churchill)
"But let judgment run down as waters,
and righteousness as a mighty stream." (Amos)
"What you see is what you get." (English proverb)
CerroFerro (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Examples" of parallelism? Can you provide supporting source?
Talk:Megazostrodon

message: The reference that is linked to this statement does not seem to support that as it had a larger brain this made it nocturnal. Could you be a little clearer as to the source of this assertion.--Milynchke 
:You're right-it should link to the fur and fangs reference (number one) which does provide information on this-i just can't seem to fix it but i'll see if i can find someone who can! Greebo cat 20:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, should be fixed now-thanks to a little help from Doc  Tropics . Thanks doc... Greebo cat 23:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nocturnal as a result of large brain

message: This phrase is too generalized to transmit any real information: can the salient non-mammalian characteristics be identified, with a sentence or two explaining them to the reasonably-prepared layman? --Wetman (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, there should be a short description of some of the characteristics. Give me a short while to do some research and i'll add something in (if i can find any sources!) Have been out of the game for a while though so bear with me while i get back up to speed! Greebo cat (talk) 00:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "non-mammalian characteristics"

message: The translation of the scientific name might be better at the top of the page, in the introduction, in keeping with other animal description pages.  I think it can look like this:
  
Megazostrodon (Greek mega-large, zostros-girdle and odon-tooth, — ‘Rudner’s large girdle tooth’  — referring to the large external cingula, or ridges of the upper molars) is an extinct Mammaliaform that is widely accepted as being ...
To get this, I just cut and pasted your words from the Discovery section.  I suggest that something along these lines be placed in the introduction.  BThomascall (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovery
Talk:Aurora Regional Fire Museum

message: Apparently our standard blurb text (written by me) is reprinted (with our permission) here  and this has caused red flags to come up as a copyright violation.
I am the Curator of the Aurora Regional Fire Museum, the original author of this text, and also the museum's webmaster.  You will find most of this same text printed on our website at -- http://www.auroraregionalfiremuseum.org/new/faqs.htm and also at http://www.auroraregionalfiremuseum.org/museum/index.htm
As author/copyright holder I freely grant GNU Free Documentation License for this material.
- David -
David Lewis, Curator
Aurora Regional Fire Museum
*Thanks for the clarification, but this will still need to be re-written in a more encyclopedic format per WP:STYLE.  I will, however, remove the copyvio notice.  I will help work on this article when I get a chance, but I'm swamped with other things for the rest of the week.  I have added the "tone" and "cleanup" tags, which might signal other editors to come help as well.  Thank you for adding your museum to Wikipedia. --Czj 09:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns
Talk:Cat flu

message: What do you do when your cat has cat flu? - unsigned
:Click on the links at the bottom of the page and read them. Feel free to add that information to wikipedia. But do not copy it word for word. That is a copyright violation. You can copy a sentence or two or three from each source so long as you credit them (under fair use). I'll fix the format for you, so don't worry about the format - but you must credit the sources you use. WAS 4.250 16:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What do you do 

message: The article doesn't make sense- cat flu is a disease, it's symptoms, it's a misnomer, it's a syndrome, it is feline herpes virus which is closely related to cat flu. Volunteer1234 (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  incoherent 

message: See edit of 2022-01-24. The section about 'In the 2013 psychological horror film Escape from Tomorrow,...'   was added. I find it weird to include that. Anyone else thinks that also? Walter (talk) 15:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie trivia? 

message: Hi, I'd like to combine all these comments and clean up the page. I plan to use veterinary resources, mainly from the AMVA. I think that this should be less confusing - explain that cat flu is not a singular disease but more of a colloquially used phrase. I also don't think movie trivia is necessary to be included. Allen.mol (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Edits 

message: — Assignment last updated by Bluepoppyseed (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL2650 Science Writing Origins, Ethics, and Emerging Genres
Talk:Mario in popular culture

message: List of cameos of the Mario series has the same content of this page and then some. Cultural references and cameos can be placed on the same page, as many are the same thing. -- Jelly Soup 08:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely. The few things on this page that are not mentioned on List of cameos of the Mario series could be reworded and put on that page. –The Great Llamasign here 20:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. As there hasn't been any objections, I've merged the articles. ~  ► Wykebjs ◄  (userpage | talk) 20:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Pico Simón Bolívar

message: Note that most other language versions of Wikipedia put the height at 5775 meters above sea level, not 5730 meters as claimed in this article. 216Kleopatra (talk) 21:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height
Talk:KTZR (AM)

message: OK then. I started it. Someone needs to help me make it relevant and verifiable. Come on in. The water is fine...or should I say, the hot tub (a 70s artifact) is fine? Charlie Morriss Monoxide 08:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 Comment
Talk:Battle of Boulgarophygon

message: Boulgarophygon spelling with ou is oddball, in the English literature accepted spelling is with u, apparently the Boulgarophygon is a transliteration of the Middle Age Greek spelling when  ου = ou stood for u, and Bulgar was spelled Boulgar. The modern universal accepted spelling is Bulgar, not Boulgar, see for example RuncimanRunciman S., A history of the First Bulgarian empire, London, G.Bell & Sons, 1930, p. 149 and Treadgold. Treadgold, Warren A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997, p. 464,   I suggest to correct the spelling to accepted English form. Redirect from Bulgarophygon to Boulgarophygon was done without any discussion, with "precision" that discounts the accepted English form and conflicts with other citations in English WP. Any objections? Barefact (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Boulgarophygon spelling
Talk:Banshee (media player)

message: Can we move this to Banshee (media player)? GabrielBurt (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The release history is quite long, and include both stable and preview releases. Since everyting in preview releases also are included in the stable releases, it's no point to include both. If no one disagree, I'm going to remove all of the preview releases. Jonny2BeGood (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Only include stable releases in the release history?

message: Is this program still being maintained or is it dead?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.220.14.176 (talk) 07:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project dead? 
Talk:Yamada Nagamasa

message: Do you have a trustworthy source to conclude that in Yamada passed away in 1630? As the Movie of Yamada states: Yamada passed away in 1633 holding on to his commitments.. Source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.107.18.143 (talk) 23:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passing away of Yamada in 1630? 

message: Did he ever get
married or have any kids 2601:203:100:477:F043:EE56:C840:562E (talk) 03:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he married
Talk:Christianity in Italy

message: I wasn't sure of a good way to do it, but a distinction needs to be made between Catholic (i.e., Roman Catholic) and catholic, which includes Eastern Orthodox. In addition, "Protestant" really only applies to churches which arose out of the Reformation. Jehovah's Witnesses and LDS are not truly Christian sects, let alone Protestant ones. This needs to be clarified in the demographics section. IrisWings 09:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion they are definitely part of the restorationist and evangelical movements, but I am open to different opinions. --Checco 08:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

text: About Catholics, I don't think there is a problem, indeed in the article it is spoken of Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodoxes. --Checco 08:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic, catholic, and Protestant 
Talk:François Gaston de Levis, Duc de Levis

message: I made an article about Francis de Gaston, Chevalier de Levis, and someone else wrote a stub called François Gaston de Levis, Duc de Levis, and I'm confused, because my article's not a stub-User:District Attorney
:Hi there! It seems that two people had the idea to write about this gentleman at the same time, but chose a different version of his title each time. The solution is to merge the two articles. I am no expert on the subject matter, but you may be in a better position to judge which version of his name is more correct (see also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and, more specifically, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)), then follow the procedures on the first page I linked to. Oh, and the latter page title is François Gaston de Lévis, Duc de Lévis. Hope that helps! — QuantumEleven 06:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be a re-direct on the old page, for people who might be weird chance go there. So am adding that now. Mathmo Talk 09:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two articles with same name
Talk:Christ Church Lutheran (Minneapolis, Minnesota)

message: article says ELIEL, but the category says EERO. Which is it? Murderbike (talk) 00:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both, actually.  --Bobak (talk) 17:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designer 
Talk:Ruff 'n' Tumble

message: I moved the article from Ruff n' Tumble (Computer Game), which was a) unneeded and b) wrongly capitalized anyway. Some admin should delete the old article. --Michael Drüing 09:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominated old page as WP:AFD, I hope I did everything right... --Michael Drüing 10:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I googled around a bit for this game, and it seems that the correct title is Ruff 'n' Tumble (note the extra apostrophe), as can be seen on this screenshot. So another move to the right title might be neccessary --Michael Drüing 18:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I moved it. --Allefant 11:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game name 

message: 40 Winks was allegedly released or at least announced in some parts of Europe as Ruff & Tumble (with an ampersand). Is this noteworthy enough as a source of confusion to mention in the hatnote? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The article in question was moved, and I had to fix the resulting link to a disambiguation page in my original post. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 01:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote
Talk:Draco

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was moved Patstuarttalk|edits 01:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Result of move discussion is to move Draco → Draco (lawgiver) and move Draco (disambiguation) → Draco.  This is based on the search results supplied by the supporters and the lack of supporting evidence from the opposers for their position. —Doug Bell talk 09:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support - Dr. Submillimeter 09:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Support -- Beardo 05:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: *Comment - as these two are so closely linked, it would have been better to have one discussion covering both moves. -- Beardo 05:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment - I did not look closely enough at WP:RM.  I only read up to the nomination process for single pages; I did not see the multiple page move procedure at the bottom.  I will use that procedure in the future.  Dr. Submillimeter 07:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. Patstuarttalk|edits 01:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support - Dr. Submillimeter 09:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support -- Beardo 05:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Comment - Note the parallel discussion on Talk:Draco. Dr. Submillimeter 09:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment - as these two are so closely linked, it would have been better to have one discussion covering both moves. -- Beardo 05:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment - I did not look closely enough at WP:RM.  I only read up to the nomination process for single pages; I did not see the multiple page move procedure at the bottom.  I will use that procedure in the future.  Dr. Submillimeter 07:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. Patstuarttalk|edits 01:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: thank you for the corrections. I didn't notice it was disambig page. 94.252.6.224 (talk) 12:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig.page error
Talk:Europa Cantat

message: Since I am the OWNER of the website www.EuropaCantat.org, this is NOT a copyright violation.
The person who submitted that article, Sonja Greiner, E-mail info@EuropaCantat.org is the Secretary General of Europa Cantat and therefore has the copyright on the website www.EuropaCantat.org. This can be verified on www.EuropaCantat.org by going to "Contact" or to "About Europa Cantat" - "Staff"
I would be happy if the article on Europa Cantat appeared in Wikipedia!
With best regards
Sonja Greiner
Europa Cantat
I have now submitted the page again and hope it will work now. 
Sonja Greiner (EuropaCantat 10:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006
Talk:Geneva Community High School

message: I removed the large list of clubs/activities, as it was copied from the school's brochure. --Taeshadow (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clubs/Activities 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Saif Energy Ltd

message: Hi,
Could you please let me know why Saif Energy Ltd is up for deletion ? It is referenced directly to the company website . Along with that Ahmed Nawaz Khan is president Saif Energy Ltd. That is also referenced to the company website.Saif Group of Companies is a well renowned company in Pakistan.
Thanks,Best Regards (Jawadrox 10:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sierra Leone Government Railway

message: What are the sharpest curves used by the old SRGR?
Tabletop 10:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If I knew it would be in the article :-) --Michael Johnson 00:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since the line is closed, it is no longer mentioned in Janes. Tabletop 09:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curves? 

message: Here is a coincidence. Everard Calthrop, a strong advocate of of narrow gauge railways, particularly of 2' 6" gauge, opened a railway consultancy in Liverpool in 1892, and later advocates a narrow gauge railway connecting Liverpool and Manchester in a competition run by the Liverpool Chamber of Commerce. In 1893 the LCC promotes the construction of the Sierra Leone Government Railway, which was subsequently built in 2' 6" gauge. Was there any connection? --Michael Johnson (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is possible that Calthrop had an influence on the choice of gauge for the SLGR, as Calthrop was promoting the 2' 6" gauge and co-ordinated plans for axle-loads and rolling stock designs in the 1890s at about the same time as the SLGR started.  The two are mention in the same issue of a newspaper(s) without any definite causality.        Tabletop (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calthrop
Talk:Provisions of Westminster

message: Provisions of Westminster will presumably have its own article one day (albeit that it is a bit of a footnote in UK Parliamentary history), but for now I have inserted a redirect to the Provisions of Oxford (that article talks about the Provisions of Westminster (which only lasted 3 years anyhow) and the Provisions of Oxford superseded them. Legis 10:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, have replaced it with a stubby summary of the provisions and their background. Legis 13:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary redirect

message: Does anybody have the direct quote from Kings, Barons and Justices that is used to make the statement at the end of the article? I cannot find that book in a single library, and it is perfect for a project I am doing. Thanks for your help —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sedi911 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Brand quote
Talk:Norbert Guterman

message: was placed on this article before I had had a chance to write more than an introductory sentence.  
Norbert Guterman was one of the most accomplished and productive translators whose work I have encountered.  As can be seen from the partial select list of his translations, a number of them continue to be reissued decades after their initial publication.  I hope some substantial biographical information will be unearthed about this intriguing scholar-translator.  He deserves an article of his own — more so, than many translators who already have one.
:logologist|Talk 10:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for speedy deletion
Talk:List of castles and palaces in Sweden

message: I've been trying to ce the last sections of the list so it all looks the same. But while adding the information, I'm curious as to what the heading "date" is supposed to denote? Date founded, building started, building finished, main period of building or what? For example, Tullgarn palace is one of the finest examples in Sweden of a Gustavian palace, so it would make sense to put the date as 18th century, but the history of the palace goes back much further. I've improvised so far. Does anyone know what the idea behind the "date" heading is? Whatever it is it should be clarified.
Any ideas? Thanks! Yakikaki (talk) 10:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While looking for a manor, I came across this list. I have updated the redirects so that the names are all the same as the actual articles. I have no idea what the "date" is supposed to mean, but having dealt with all the Grill's estates, I think there should be two dates/columns: "Commenced in" and "Completed in" (or maybe "First completed in" since it may have been converted since then). w.carter-Talk 18:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: The list has always needed major attention, and the English names of most of these buildings need to be changed, since they are palaces, not castles (a common Swenglish problem). I've been hoping to have the time to fix all that for years now. Don't know if I'll ever get to it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Most listed here are not castles
Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2003 video game)

message: This page reads like an advertisement in my opinion.  Not only is the phrase "Are you ready for a shell of a ride?" a very old, bad joke relating to TMNT, it also sounds like something someone might read off the back of the game box.  In fact that entire introduction section could use a re-write, and fixing the rest of the article wouldn't hurt, either.  ekedolphin 10:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled