Talk:Neurolinguistics

message: ===Computational modeling===
The Computational modeling section talks about CM without ever saying what it is.  This is an issue, for obvious reasons.  Politizer (talk) 02:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an outline of a course in the history of neuro-linguistics: . It is very close to history of neuroscience. It would just emphasize some of the findings directly related to language and brain. It would be nice to have a summary of the historical differences between psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics. ----Action potential  t c 04:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks very useful.  I have some stuff on more recent history (past 10 years or so, ongoing arguments over stuff like the visual word form area, dual-route and single-route models of morphological analysis, semantic vs. morphosyntactic representations of word category, etc.) but most of that is probably too detailed for this article, which should be more of a dumbed-down survey. —Politizer talk/contribs 04:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits needed 

message: The Computational modeling section talks about CM without ever saying what it is.  This is an issue, for obvious reasons.  Politizer (talk) 02:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Computational modeling

message: Needs to go further back--discussing, for example, phrenology and similar fields that led to the idea that the brain is divided up functionally.  Or, at the very least, link to Neuroscience#History using the  template.  Politizer (talk) 02:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an outline of a course in the history of neuro-linguistics: . It is very close to history of neuroscience. It would just emphasize some of the findings directly related to language and brain. It would be nice to have a summary of the historical differences between psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics. ----Action potential  t c 04:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That looks very useful.  I have some stuff on more recent history (past 10 years or so, ongoing arguments over stuff like the visual word form area, dual-route and single-route models of morphological analysis, semantic vs. morphosyntactic representations of word category, etc.) but most of that is probably too detailed for this article, which should be more of a dumbed-down survey. —Politizer talk/contribs 04:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: A section on the relevance of neurolinguistics to other linguistic fields, and the interaction between the fields; a section on what influence neurolinguistics has had on real-life issues (ie, speech pathology, for examples); mention of some landmark studies (I mean, this article doesn't even mention Wernicke, who any college intro linguistics student knows).  Politizer (talk) 02:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: new sections

message: Just a beginning. Trying to find something relevant.
* - A Non-Invasive Imaging Approach to Understanding Speech Changes following Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
* - Tributes to Macdonald Critchley and his achievements in neurolinguistics
* - The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation
* - The elusive character of agrammatism (1995 review article)
—Mattisse (Talk) 00:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Pubmed is a good database, and it will be good for me to get outside my comfort zone (right now, the majority of the sources here are things that are in the bibliography for my own latest paper).  I'll have to try to take a look at these over the break. —Politizer talk/contribs 01:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Collecting some references here

message: I'm also wondering if it might be useful to take the Experimental design section and spin it into another article, with a brief summary and a  link here.... but maybe it would be better to hold off on that until I've expanded more parts of the article (like, I still need to get around to writing a section on some of the big issues that are being researched a lot now), since right now I don't think the article size is a problem yet. —Politizer talk/contribs 01:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-out 

message: Stumbled across a review article that looks like it will be useful here (especially in the History, Brain Imaging, and Experimental Design sections); haven't had time to read it carefully yet, sticking it here for future reference.
*
Politizer talk/contribs 19:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Neurolinguistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205094518/http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/broca.htm to http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/broca.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108093742/http://www.nami.org/Content/ContentGroups/Helpline1/Transcranial_Magnetic_Stimulation_(rTMS).htm to http://www.nami.org/Content/ContentGroups/Helpline1/Transcranial_Magnetic_Stimulation_(rTMS).htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091208115451/http://psych.athabascau.ca/html/Psych355/Exp/lexical.shtml?sso=true to http://psych.athabascau.ca/html/Psych355/Exp/lexical.shtml?sso=true
*Added  tag to http://www.maccs.mq.edu.au/~scrain/papers/GALA%2704.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)