lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Queens–Midtown Tunnel

message: Shouldn't the name have a dash in it? --Voidvector 06:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dash 

message: In many lectures QMT means Quantum Mechanics Theory. I think this is much more important than the Queens Midtown Tunnel, and a redirect from QMT to this page is in my opinion not fair.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.87.132.9 (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum Mechanics Theory 

message: Should we have a section talking about animal rights protest in a page about a tunnel? Maybe a link to the circus page where that comment can be made?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.7.185 (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Animal Rights Protest

message: How do I add the official QMT shield to the infobox? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  21:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I moved the portal image downward when I expanded the page, so I guess there's room for the shield in the infobox now. epicgenius (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official shield
Talk:Haqiqat Rai

message: It is apparent that this is an issue around which politics is formulated (such as memorials being erected, etc.) and that notablity can thus be asserted, but either there is an assesment of factual accuracy of historical events (to which 'Bed Times Stories' isn't the prime source of information) or its is referred to as a possibly fictional event. --Soman 15:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jiří Třanovský

message: I just organized this article and added a saint infobox. Clearly, it needs much more work, and my time is limited. I noticed that mentions only the deaths of two of his children, but not his wife's name (or death, which may also have been important) nor whether any children survived, much less his own family background (even if he was upper class or not). 
Clearly the religious wars were important in both his life and the region's history. I found a pdf  about Liechtenstein (http://tips.fm/entry.php?1118-Liechtenstein-The-Counts-of-Hohenems-1613-1712) which mentions the probable family of his royal patron, who deserves an article of his own IMHO. I can't seem to find wikipedia articles about that family, only a mention of rebuilding Vaduz castle in this era. The article about the Austrian town from which the dynasty took its name has a historical gap from this era, which surprised me somewhat, given that the Liechtenstein pdf says the (Protestant) Swedes invaded that far south 10 years after Tranovsky's death (as Count Kaspar's reign ended), which either accounts for the mentioned Renaissance castle or showed their art appreciation in not destroying it.Jweaver28 (talk) 12:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed
Talk:2007 Bikfaya bombings

message: I agree with you that Wikipedia is not a memorial.  However, I believe that the lives of victims of terrorism are very important to document in the history of humanity.  Plus, I was following the lead of Wikipedia entries on Daniel M. Lewin, Garnet Bailey, Edward P. Felt, Tom Burnett and Mark Bingham—all victims of terrorism with entries on Wikipedia.
I disagree with your categorization of my entry that its neutrality and factual accuracy is disputed.  I have referenced all statements in the article. 
I am still compiling information on the short life and achievement of Attar to make it stand out from the article dealing with the bombing, so I hope you ca be patient with me.  
I thank you for your advice and I appreciate you keeping a watch on the neutrality and accuracy of the articles on Wikipedia.  This is my goal as well!--Linaduliban 18:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the best would be to merge the article with the article dealing with the bombing. Very little of the material in his one (except for name, age, name of parents) related to Attar as opposed to the bombing event. --Soman 16:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Huaya

message: Moved this out of the article space. Probably not worth cleaning; better to start from scratch with our own article, expanding and citing facts as we find them. cab 16:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machine translation of jawiki page 

message: The kaō that now illustrates the article is by Toyotomi Hideyoshi. It comes from the scholarly biography "Hideyoshi" by Mary Elizabeth Berry, published by The Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University. Berry writes (p. xii) "The chapter ornament is Hideyoshi's kaō, a monogram or emblematic signature." Fg2 11:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toyotomi Hideyoshi kaō 

message: Is this the same thing as a 'kakihan'? Noel (talk) 05:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Kakihan?
Talk:Tetrameric protein

message: Homotetramer and Heterotetramer are stubs and little more than definitions (with examples) which can easily be incorporated within the broader topic (Tetrameric protein). Note that this is better than a merge to Tetramer because the more specific terms are primarily (if not exclusively) used in the discussion of proteins). The existing ledes also specify proteins. Klbrain (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree with this. They would be far more logical as sections of the Tetrameric protein page. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 09:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Dolaucothi Gold Mines

message: I have added much information, most of which has existed since the late 1960's as a result of my fieldwork and excavations on the site. Most if not all of our work has been confirmed by Prof Burnham at Lampeter University, who continues the research programme there. Peterlewis (talk) 10:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Information

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Sheldon Brookbank

message: In the Ducks season history it states that Brookbank scored his first NHL goal, yet it's not shown on his biography list? Can someone please correct this. The link where it states that he scored a goal is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%9309_Anaheim_Ducks_season
Thanks. --KapteinBene (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First NHL Goal
Talk:Jason Done

message: This entire article is just a word-for-word copy of Done's biography entry on IMDb (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0232383/bio). I'm not sure what to do with it. TaintedMustard 20:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDb entry 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0232383/bio. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dpmuk (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I've removed the claim that Done narrated Monsters Inside Me, which isn't borne out by the program's page ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monsters Inside Me
Talk:Uridine

message: I read that Uridine is a nootropic that grows neurons  aside from yeast are there other fungi that have notable amounts of uridine
Wurtman RJ, Ulus IH, Cansev M, et al. Synaptic proteins and phospholipids are increased in gerbil brain by administering uridine plus docosahexaenoic acid orally. Brain Res. 2006 May 9;1088(1):83-92.  
Lef Org has a research description of uridine at a product page also
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.90.99.62 (talk) 19:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Uridine as neurite growing nootropic

message: If anyone adds an infobox, the unique SMILES code for Uridine is OC[C@H]1O[C@H](C(O)C1O)N2C=CC(=O)NC2=O.
That's C9N2O6H12
71.41.210.146 00:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES code 

message: I see that walnuts is on the list, however it is unsourced and unquantified. Not only that, but as part of the list here, the factoid has perpetuated to many other sites.
Please provide some source (and preferably also a quantity) or else remove it.
Drsruli (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walnuts
Talk:Uridine triphosphate

message: Say in terms 2401:4900:44C0:F142:5F68:5899:2F5F:6B41 (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cas number represents volume in reference isit 

message: — Assignment last updated by Chirizarry (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab - Fall 2023
Talk:Year-to-date

message: Hi there, would like to propose to simplify the preamble of this article as current definition is too complicated and can be explained in a much simplier form - like the one in investopedia describing Year-to-date (YTD) as the period beginning January 1st of the current year up until today's date. (Sergeyl1984 (talk) 08:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Article's opening sentence is the most important, so I simplified it per WP:MOSBEGIN. --hydrox (talk) 09:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  too complicated definition
Talk:XacBank

message: I added text and cites. Also, I removed POV. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Xacbank (talk) 02:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Xacbank (talk) 02:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should not be speedy deleted because...  
Talk:Worth (magazine)

message: The chunk of text added in this edit appears to be copied from somewhere, but I can't locate the source online.  WP:COPYVIO  --George100 (talk) 06:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright text?

message: I'm avoiding editing articles at this point, but will note that this Reuters article about layoffs at the publisher would give us some source beyond a defunct Furnture Today link. Having said that, I'm not sure there is much here worth saving. The (unsourced) claim of awards is for an award set that does not have its own Wikipedia page, which is a good rule of thumb for whether an award carries sufficient notability. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Let the greater part of the article description cover the aspect of what Worth Magazine is, its essence and the like RATHER than what deals it's made, to whom and how ... which creates that sense of advertising, unacceptable by Wikipedia. Dee Soulza (talk) 20:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite, Create notability
Talk:Wirtschaftswoche

message: Move Parsecboy (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment was copied here from Wikipedia:Requested moves.  Please discuss the move in this section.  An administrator will come along in a few days to determine whether there is consensus for the move.  Thanks!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 17:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Urobilinogen

message: About a week ago, an IP address made the claim within the article that the graphic of the molecule is incorrect. I reverted that change and advised the editor to bring the concern here to the talk page. However, maybe someone watching this page and more knowledgeable in the subject can see what the problem is, if any, until the IP responds here (assuming he or she does). Cheers, Northumbrian (talk) 01:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The structure is correct just displayed oddly. There is a newer linear SVG version called File:D-Urobilinogen.svg. I think the confusing part it sound like its is a bilin (C10 is double bonded) but it is a bilane) maybe? I am not sure if C3 and C18 are ethyls and not vinyls. --Squidonius (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim that the molecule graphic is incorrect 

message: Currently as of 6/24/2019, the nomenclature section is a copy + paste of the Human Metabolome Project's information on urobilinogen, here: http://www.hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB0004158. It states that the physiological urobilinogen is D-urobilinogen, and it's further converted down to i-urobilinogen (mesobilinogen) or L-urobilinogen (stercobilinogen). This is mildly conflicting with PubChem, which lists physiological urobilinogen as a synonym of i-urobilinogen (mesobilinogen), here: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/26818. PubChem has a separate listing for D-urobilinogen and does not list that as synonymous with plain ole' "urobilinogen." 
The only reason I'm concerned about this is that stercobilinogen is purportedly identical to urobilinogen in terms of human physiology; they differ by excretion location in the body, and this can be confusing to medical students wondering why two different compounds result from an extremely similar (ie identical) reduction step. But I haven't readily found sources that support that claim, and while two extremely similar compounds may be physiologically synonymous, I wouldn't want to make so bold of a claim as to say they're identical without being sure. 
Any biochemists/physiologists around? Emma a goldman (talk) 18:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature and enantiomers and conflicting primary sources, oh my
Talk:William S. Knudsen

message: Here's a good source if anyone is interested in expanding this article a little Arthur Herman: The FDR Lesson Obama Should Follow. -75.171.11.47 (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A good source 
Talk:Ad Age

message: They way they are included is less factual and seems more promotional. This a popular publication in its category so it makes the notability guidelines but just poorly written.--Monstermike99 (talk) 01:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  URLs in Copy
Talk:Urocortin

message: Disagree with merge proposal.  Three genes with three distinct sets of properties should have distinct pages.  Since no one has really acted on the merge in several months, I'm removing the tags for now.  Feel free to revive them and discuss further here. AndrewGNF (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Might be wrong, but think it has to be one or the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vburmester (talk • contribs) 23:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protein or Peptide
Talk:James van Riemsdyk

message: I've noticed that most media reports are using vanRiemsdyk. --4.239.168.233 00:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: James vanRiemsdyk according to NHL.com. Let's move this article and change stuff.--Serte [ Talk · Contrib ] 12:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article should be moved to James van Riemsdyk. Also, notice how his last name looks on the back of his Phantoms jersey. --scottieISmad (talk) 04:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it vanRiemsdyk or Van Riemsdyk? 

message: Source right here that says he is 6'3, 200 lbs. http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/teams/players/bio/?id=6041&hubname=nhl-flyers Sidthekid87 03:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: vanRiemsdyk Gained 10 pounds
Talk:Hibernia Bank Building (New Orleans)

message: Added coordinates for the Hibernia Bank Building as per Google Maps D.c.camero (talk) 02:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: What was the reason for moving from "Hibernia Bank Building" to the neologism "Hibernia Bank Building (New Orleans)"?  Is there some other notable building of the same name it needs to be distinguished from?  The former simpler name in general use is now just a redirect. Wondering, -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the :Hibernia Bank Building (San Francisco). Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename reason?
Talk:Von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor

message: "In normal cells in hypoxic conditions, HIF1A is activated with little activation of HIF2A. However, in tumors the balance of HIF1A and HIF2A is tipped towards HIF2A. While HIF1A serves as a pro-apoptotic factor, HIF2A interacts with Cyclin D1. This leads to increased survival due to lower rates of apoptosis and increased proliferation due to the activation of Cyclin D1.[3]"
this is pretty dubious. theres plenty of normal cell types that activate HIF2a at least as strongly as HIF1a. the apoptosis part is fairly cell type specific also i think. this isnt a proper reference either
--Soltee (talk) 12:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function
Talk:Blaze and Blade: Eternal Quest

message: although i realize this game wasnt exactly hugely popular or easy to obtain i myslf feel it was very underatted, especially with it being the only decent 4 player proper RPG game on the ps1, any fan of RPG games not caring about graphics will have understood why this was so fun with its multplayer mode.
Anyway im after any good help i can get with this, i have completed this game a few times solo and with friends but this was over 5 years ago and i am lacking alot of the knowledge i used to remember. Lukey12345 16:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any help welcome. 
Talk:Arbitration clause

message: I removed the following content from the article:
The text I removed has significant problems with WP:NPOV, WP:UNDUE, WP:NOR, and WP:V.  Hopefully we should be able to rewrite this material so that the article can contain appropriate material on the enforceability of arbitration clauses.  RJaguar3 | u | t 17:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed original research 

message: "it is presumed" is tagged "by whom". I think it's pretty clear in this context that "it is presumed by the court" but without an explicit source I wouldn't make the edit myself but rather suggest the edit. 24.16.205.24 (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: On the topic of weasel words
Talk:Articles of partnership

message: Should partnership agreement redirect to this article?  Surely they are different concepts in most jurisdictions? --Legis (talk - contributions) 11:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Partnership agreement
Talk:Wet laboratory

message: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wet laboratory, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.wbdg.org/space-types/laboratory-wet, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
:*If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Wet laboratory and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Wet laboratory, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
:*If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Wet laboratory. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
:*If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Wet laboratory with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Wet laboratory saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Teetee taw (talk) 13:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem: Wet laboratory

message: This article has been redirected to Wet lab as someone has started a new article there, and we cannot have two articles on an identical subject.  If you object to the redirect, please see Wikipedia:Requested moves on how to move the main article back here. Hzh (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article redirected
Talk:XDNA

message: I'm enrolled in the AdGen Wikipedia Project for Advanced Genetics and I will be modifying this article to improve it from Stub status. If you have any input I would definitely appreciate it, so feel free to add to this talk page or contact me through my own talk page! Achild2 (talk) 18:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Genetics and AdGen

message: Why does YDNA redirect here?Lexysexy (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No response, no logic, so I've disconnected.Lexysexy (talk) 23:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: YDNA