lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Russian submarine AG-16

message: This article needs references.  It's okay if they're in Finnish. Cla68 22:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Finnish submarine AG-16 →  – While the submarine did spend a long time in Finnish hands it was as an unrepaired vessel out of the water and was never commissioned into the Finnish navy. The significant active period as a warship was with the Russian navy. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

text: * Support - Based on the article, the Finnish involvement is rather minimal. -Ljleppan (talk) 10:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 November 2023
Template talk:Religion and politics

message: I'm not sure about the current last box: Explicitly Religious Political Movements. Some overtly relgious parties are more extreme than others. Christian parties in Europe (Christian Democratic Union, et al.) are generally populist mainstream parties not always working towards non-secular goals -- although the Kreuzurteil shows that the matter is fuzzy. Precisely how religious should a group be to warrant inclusion? samwaltz 22:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't understand what this is supposed to mean. How are Islamism, Christian Reconstructionism, etc. not "explicitly religious"?  I'm removing it.Prezbo (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreseen difficulties

message: I'd like to see elements of other religions worked in. What else fits? samwaltz 22:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other religions

message: While some aspects of the Sharia (particularly those advocated by Islamists) can be considered a "political ideology" most of the sharia isn't. The sharia is dominated by dietary laws, laws of marriage and divorce, laws of worship (salat), specification about various rituals (like the pilgrimage). These are pretty much universal activities practiced everyday by ordinary Muslims (e.g. it doesn't take a coup d'etat for a Muslim to avoid alcohol). Inclusion of the sharia in this template seems a bit unnecessary.Bless sins (talk) 19:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sharia

message: , Thanks for your keen interest in this subject. However, I am afraid that the template is now getting too large to be useful. The purpose of a template is to provide an aid to quick navigation on related topics. When people face a thick wall of text in the template, they will simply walk away, and the template becomes counter-productive. If there are too many entries to be listed, it is probably better to make them into a wp:list article.
Can you pick 10-15 most important articles for each section of the template, and move the others into a list article?
Pinging  for further guidance. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There are other navboxes way more large than this, I think right now it has a normal size. But I will make it with collapsible groups to a more easy navigation. Anyway thats all the links that I found, I finished with this template and I don't think that it can become more bigger. Rupert Loup (talk) 10:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting too large
Talk:Neustadt (Aisch)-Bad Windsheim

message: Is "(Aisch)" really part of the formal name of the district? —Tamfang (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not; :de:Landkreis Neustadt an der Aisch-Bad Windsheim —Tamfang (talk) 18:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  punctuation
Talk:List of AIPAC officers

message: We need more background on current Officers.  DBrnstn 22:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Meissen (district)

message: dubbel s?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.120.33 (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Wang Xiuchu

message: Wang Xiuchu (zh: 王秀楚) was the author of an 8000-word book, which gave a detailed eyewitness account of the mass murdering of Yangzhou civilians by the invading Manchu soldiers led by Manchu general Dodo. The name of the book is Yangzhou shi ri ji (The Record of Ten Days in Yangzhou). 
The book is of high historical significance.
It was destroyed by the Manchu and subsequently banned during Qing dynasty for nearly 250 years, until a student discovered it in a Tokyo university library, on the eve of the Xinhai revolution; it was then secretly brought back into China. 
In 1897, a Chinese Han revolutionary started to print this book in secret, and distributed it as a piece of revolutionary literature calling for the overthrow of the Manchu regime.
During the second Sino-Japan war, many copies of this book were also being printed and distributed, to remind all the Chinese that they were on the verge of being ruled by the Japanese empire.
Note:The above information is sourced from http://baike.baidu.com/view/27821.htm#4 (in Chinese). I am seeking consensus to enter the above information onto  
Wang Xiuchu.Arilang1234 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requesting consensus discussion
Talk:John N. McMahon

message: Currently, under the CIA section it reads, "McMahon joined the CIA in 1951 or 1966." 
The first source for 1951 is:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081123123212/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,925363,00.html  
for 1956: 
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1986-03-05-8601160810-story.html
However, per a CIA document released in a FOIA request it appears that 1951 is the correct date:
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0001407025 Mountain squi (talk) 17:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIA start year appears to be 1951
Talk:Murder of Fred Fulton and Verna Decarie

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed by . (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Gregory Despres →  – I feel like this article's focal point should be shifted to the murders themselves, and the information surrounding the perpetrator can be moved further down in the article. Fundamentally, this person is only notable for this murder case, so I feel as if it would be more appropriate to have the article named after the murder case itself B3251 (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 December 2023
Talk:Bon Secours Wellness Arena

message: Now that the Confederate flag is totally gone from the grounds of the S.C. Statehouse, what excuse/premise is being used not to have events there of national interest?  Attendance?  Remoteness from major markets?2600:1004:B11B:A74F:F8D3:4DEE:1871:8AAB (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the excuse now?
Talk:F5 (band)

message: The article mentions 2003 several times, but they released their first album back in 2000. Offkorn 21:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When exactly was F5 formed? 
Talk:Blue Arena

message: The venue has its new name, Blue Arena, so I think it's time to move the article to the venue's new name. 96.227.141.216 (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Mariposa War

message: Should I include that it Mariposa is Spanish for butterfly? --HollywoodHeart 23:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While that is an interesting fact, I don't believe it needs to be included in this article. Moreover, I could find an appropriate place to add it. For next time, remember to Be Bold and make your edit, as the worst that can happen is that someone might delete it. --Gavilar (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

message: It says, "In three years, the non-Native American population rose from 200,000 in 1848 to 14,000 in 1852." 200,000 to 14,000 is a drop, not a rise. Art LaPella (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Art LaPella (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backwards 

message: — Assignment last updated by Afh1858 (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST3443 The Frontier Before 1850
Talk:Lance Morrow

message: The controversy was a mess. The contention that Morrow had copied his bullet points from David Duke was not supported by the link and I can't find any other support for it on the web, so I changed it to more accurately reflect Harriot's column. 
There was also a "response" from Morrow which was several paragraphs long and which didn't appear to be from any other source on the web; it certainly wasn't cited. The way it was worded, it seemed as though it was presented as Morrow responding directly in the article. That seemed like it violated the NPOV policy, the no original research policy, and the verifiability policy at least. I removed it. If the rebuttal exists somewhere other than this article, it seems like the thing to do would be to link it with a brief description and a citation. Mwphil (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 
Talk:Agencia Espacial Mexicana

message: Per WP:ENGLISH José Gnudista (talk) 06:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: English name

message: By chamber of senators are we talking about the Mexican Senate or the Chamber of Deputies?
--Spikeleefan 23:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chamber 

message: We need to create history section to put some stuff about the origines of the agency, how the first Mexican Agency was the Comision Nacional del Espacio Exterior that was opened in 1962 and how it was dismantled in 1977 and so on. Supaman89 (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section 

message: Reading the history section of the article, my basic summary is that the country had a previous interest in forming a space agency but hadn't ever been officially approved by the Mexican government until the Calderón administration? (Or the reason why Mexico's space program had barley started?) Samusfan80 (talk) 07:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  So...I don't get it... 

message: AEM stands for Agencia Espacial Mexicana with a website at http://www.aem.gob.mx/.  This is the official government of Mexico website of the space agency.
AEXA stands for Agencia Espacial meXicanA with websites at http://www.aexa.tv/ and http://www.aexa.divaac.org/noteng.html is a website from a group promoting the creation of AEM.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuertoVallarta (talk • contribs) 22:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AEM is the official acronym, not AEXA 

message: The bulk of information available from AEM can be summarized with very few words: They are in the early stages of identifying needs, establishing goals, and strategies. The multitude of documents they show in their web site are full of mambo-jambo on how hard they are working to make it happen and how awesome it is going to be. There are multiple market and social studies helping them identify their strategy. I rather do not expand this Wikipedia article with the boring legalities of the basic process, as the Spanish Wikipedia did.  The activities, when substantial, will be added in time. Therefore, I removed the "incomplete" tag, as there is little of substance to add.  Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activities
Talk:Monmu period

message: Most sections of this article are mirrored in other pre-Taihō articles about non-nengō time frames, e.g.,
 
* Saimei (period)
* Tenji (period)
* Kōbun (period)
* Temmu (period)
* Jitō (period)
* Mommu (period)
 
* Sujaku		
* Hakuhō period
* Taika (non-nengo)
IMO, the value of the individual articles outweighs the prospective utility which may flow from consolidating them. --Tenmei (talk) 04:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Category talk:JavaScript libraries

message: Anyone object to me adding a link to Google Web Toolkit ? --81.106.184.50 23:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--81.106.184.50 20:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't there be separate categories for "JavaScript libraries", "JavaScript frameworks", and "JavaScript run-time environments"? --إلياس الجزائري (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:14, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorizing
Talk:Annita van Iersel

message: I have a conundrum.  The article is currently called "Annita van Iersal", which is wrong since it's spelled "Iersel".  But even though they're now separated and for all I know she may have resumed her maiden name, she was known for one thing and one thing only, being the wife of the PM, during which time she was known as "Annita Keating".  Either way, a move is required.  Does anyone have a strong preference for "Annita van Iersel" over "Annita Keating"?  I favour the latter, obviously.  --  JackofOz 07:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the multitude of responses, I've moved it to "Annita Keating".  --  JackofOz 04:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No can do.  There's already a page called Annita Keating, which redirects to Paul Keating.  How odd.  OK, Plan B - I'm moving it to Annita van Iersel.  --  JackofOz 04:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article

message: The infobox says three, the general article says four.  Which is correct ?
:Both now say four, as in the NMA source. Wikiain (talk) 03:15, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of children 

message: Annita is at best the third foreign-born spouse of an Australian Prime Minister. Bettina Gorton, and Dame Mary cook are two I found without too much looking.
: I have removed the sentence in question.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 20:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "She was only the second foreign-born spouse of an Australian Prime Minister"
Talk:Jitō period

message: Most sections of this article are mirrored in other pre-Taihō articles about non-nengō time frames, e.g.,
 
* Saimei (period)
* Tenji (period)
* Kōbun (period)
* Temmu (period)
* Jitō (period)
* Mommu (period)
 
* Sujaku		
* Hakuhō period
* Taika (non-nengo)
IMO, the value of the individual articles outweighs the prospective utility which may flow from consolidating them. --Tenmei (talk) 01:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Alexei Yegorov (ice hockey, born 1975)

message: Legends of Hockey lists his death date as March 2, 2002, though apparently Yegorov came back to life long enough to play 13 games for a team in Moscow during the 2005–06 season.  (I am not trying to make fun of Alexei, but rather that website!)
Are there any news reports which give his correct death date?  I've seen both 2001 and 2002.  List of ice hockey players who died during their playing career would like to know. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 01:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, HockeyDB lists two Alexei Yegorovs.  The other is a goalie who is still alive and was born about a year after the right wing.  The right wing's stats definitely stop in 2001. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 01:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No when I researched this article I could find none, in fact the only thing I could come up with conclusively is sometime in 2001, and that was in a Russian hockey website. But if it was in early 2002 that's just as possible. Croat Canuck Say hello or just talk 02:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The San Jose Sharks' official website says March 2, 2002.  As for the suicide part, I'll leave the "fact" template there since the sources I found on Google were not conclusive about that. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 02:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date and alleged resurrection 
Talk:Tenmu period

message: Most sections of this article are mirrored in other pre-Taihō articles about non-nengō time frames, e.g.,
 
* Saimei (period)
* Tenji (period)
* Kōbun (period)
* Temmu (period)
* Jitō (period)
* Mommu (period)
 
* Sujaku		
* Hakuhō period
* Taika (non-nengo)
IMO, the value of the individual articles outweighs the prospective utility which may flow from consolidating them. --Tenmei (talk) 23:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Kōbun (period)

message: Most sections of this article are mirrored in other pre-Taihō articles about non-nengō time frames, e.g.,
 
* Saimei (period)
* Tenji (period)
* Kōbun (period)
* Temmu (period)
* Jitō (period)
* Mommu (period)
 
* Sujaku		
* Hakuhō period
* Taika (non-nengo)
IMO, the value of the individual articles outweighs the prospective utility which may flow from consolidating them. --Tenmei (talk) 22:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Kayakujutsu

message: Done. I heard that "Kayakujutsu" is "art of gunpowder", so I have applied only "火薬術". --Nightshadow28 13:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese script 

message: Can someone put in some citation and reference?ATTFFX (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:T-Pain discography

message: Is there an upcoming track he's collabing with Trina on.
I look dor links were I can hear:
Mr. Exclusive" (Southrn Class feat. T-Pain) 
"Dance 4 Me" (T-Pain remix) (Mark Morrison feat. T-Pain) 
Shawty 3" (Young Steff feat. T-Pain) 
Shawty 4" (Dizasta feat. T-Pain) 
What It's Like" (C.C. feat. T-Pain, Mack 10 & Shreddah) (produced by Shredda) 
Go Home With You" (Kardinal Offishall feat. T-Pain) 
"Migrate" (Mariah Carey feat. T-Pain)  
"Cutty Buddy" (Mike Jones feat. T-Pain, Lil Wayne & Twista) 
Gutta Baby" (Plies feat. T-Pain) 
Please give me links  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.177.79.28 (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Guest Appearnces

message: Is there a source for the "Ride with the ringleader" mixtape?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.10.67 (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixtape
Talk:Saimei period

message: Most sections of this article are mirrored in other pre-Taihō articles about non-nengō time frames, e.g.,
 
* Saimei (period)
* Tenji (period)
* Kōbun (period)
* Temmu (period)
* Jitō (period)
* Mommu (period)
 
* Sujaku		
* Hakuhō period
* Taika (non-nengo)
IMO, the value of the individual articles outweighs the prospective utility which may flow from consolidating them. --Tenmei (talk) 06:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Xenophoridae

message: When trying to search for carrier shell i got no drection to this page. Not sure how to change that, but it is prob worth doing. i was just lucky i knew the genus, but many won't 203.97.237.98 23:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. GrahamBould 08:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrier shell search
Talk:Aga Khan Museum

message: Thank you, , for resolving the placement of the geographic coordinates so that they appear in the upper-right corner of the page, which conforms to common style for landmarks, museums, etc. Similarly, the <city, province> style conforms to common usage. Perhaps a duplicate of the coordinates is not needed in the Infobox, unless it must be there to locate the pin on the map. Yoho2001 (talk) 04:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: That sounds pretty dubious to me. For instance, the Museum for Islamic Art (Museum für Islamische Kunst) in Berlin comes to mind, which goes back to 1904. Although it is housed in the larger Pergamonmuseum building, it has a directorate of its own and an own homepage among the public museums of Berlin (https://www.smb.museum/museen-und-einrichtungen/museum-fuer-islamische-kunst/home.html). --Ubel (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the hint, I corrected that. Best --ThT (talk) 18:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First Museum in the Western World [...]"?
Talk:Sociable

message: Hallo, 
I read in the article that the sociable has been invented by Oppermann. So as Opperman was  born in 1904, who invented that sociable on the picture of 1897. -81.244.49.53 (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The text in the cited source actually says that they were invented in Australia by Oppermann, but does not mention if he knew about their existence elsewhere before he did so. As for who invented the first one, that detail remains to be sourced. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about history 

message: These bikes look mighty unstable, and therefore, dangerous. -121.217.155.62 (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because something looks unstabledoes not mean that it is unstable. Why would these be any less stable than tandems or even singles? -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Obviously that's why no company is willing to risk being sued for making this bike. -121.217.155.62 (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just because a product isn't made anymore does not mean that it was dangerous. History is littered with perfectly safe products that are no longer in production: 8-track tape and players, electrical telegraphs, ditto machines, etc. A more likely explanation is that they were not practical, compared to tandem and single bicycles, for much else besides courting, and they were replaced in that role by the automobile. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Stability is probably fine when ridden by two riders of reasonably similar weight, say two adults. But I wouldn't want to try to ride one just by myself. A normal tandem is quite fine to ride one up, so a guy could, for example, hop on his tandem and ride over to his girlfriend's house to pick her up. Wouldn't want to try that on one of these. It also might be a problem if there is a large difference is weight, say a child-adult combo; or an NFL lineman-super model. Wschart (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  The handling of a sociable with one rider should be similar to that of a single when riding with a steep cross slope: a little tricky at first, but easy enough to get used to and likely requiring a constant applied torque at the handlebars. Other than that, the "stability" should be about the same. Not as easy as a tandem, perhaps, but not especially difficult, either. Persistent suitors have certainly faced worse challenges. -AndrewDressel (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

text: ALL bikes are unstable.  Let go of one and what happens!  It falls over!  They are clearly dangerous and should be banned </irony> Mr Larrington (talk) 17:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about stability
Talk:Yumi Tōma

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 22:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I've fixed the incorrect page move. Please feel free to make any overwritten edits now. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect page move corrected
Talk:WKKX

message: Besides the fact that the majority of the "controversy" is unsourced, the whole section reads more like a gossip column than an encyclopedia, right down to the concluding "Classic radio!" Unless the section can be sourced and the tone improved, it should probably be removed. --Moonriddengirl 23:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Why should we remove information for the sake of it. An encyclopedia should include as much information as possible. This is not listing information, this is extrapolating on the station. 76.125.203.191 (talk) 04:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For all the schedule information that was removed (most of it out of date anyway), please see WP:NOT#DIR. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Information for Sake of Removing