lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Achaia (Roman province)

message: I'm doing some research for a class. Is Archaea the same as Achaea?
69.59.202.87 (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. — the Man in Question (in question) 17:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archaea=Achaea? 

message: I've tagged this source in the article. These edits were improperly formatted with no source given besides a name.  I will remove this material in a couple of weeks unless full author, work, publisher and copyright is added.  The opinion of this author is highly contentious ... 50.111.6.31 (talk) 01:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you for promptly addressing this matter 50.111.6.31 (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  sourcing - who is "Rothaus"? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 22:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Achaea (Roman province) →  – Apparently the single reason for the not moved of 9 years ago was that , the nominator, tried to move all other Achaea pages simultaneously, and the 'common name' argument that successfully carried the main discussion was consequently assumed to be applicable here too. But this is arguably not the case. The descriptive footnote on the lede (--Pausanias' Greece, Cambridge UP) supports the case for 'Achaia' over 'Achaea', and a favorable precedent exists in the form of Sicilia (Roman province) (not Sicily) and Thracia (not Thrace). JSTOR searches for 'achaia', 'roman achaia' and 'achaia province' all return just under twice as many results as the 'achaea' counterparts. There are also more than twice as many Google Scholar search results for  than . On the other hand,  and , as well as  and , are roughly similar.
The arguments for renaming, thus, are that (1) 'Achaia' is what the Romans called their own province, (2) it's the spelling used by all primary sources, (3) it's not demonstrably used in secondary sources with less frequency than 'Achaea' when referring to the province specifically, and (4) it establishes consistency with Sicilia (Roman province) and Thracia in not using English names for these sorts of articles. Avilich (talk) 02:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 November 2021
Talk:Alfa Romeo 185T

message: The image is wrong. As I found out while discussing this in de.wikipedia.org, this photo depicts a 184TB instead of a 185T.
--Dr Tux (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The wrong data should be fixed in  wikicommons where the picture is (naming,category) -->Typ932 T·C 15:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For the benefit of later readers: As of June 2023, the infobox contains a correct image of a 185T (the "wrong" image was replaced in 2013). DH85868993 (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Ancient history of Cyprus

message: Do we have sourcing for the large block of text added by 80.193.56.62? Is it translated from a known (hopefully free) source, or original text? 
Willhsmit (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hellenistic period - sourced? 

message: The section is good but needs some references and maybe a picture or two. Manofmyth (talk) 16:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity Section 

message: Richard asr (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedited 

message: There was documentation of Cyprus before 800 BC, Alashiya isn't even mentioned in this article or any of Cyprus's history between the Neolithic and the Iron Age. J390 (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyprus had history in the Bronze Age
Talk:Germania Inferior

message: When did Lycia Et Pamphylia become a Roman province Iron Attack rules (talk) 12:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In 72AD or 73AD. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lycia Et Pamphylia
Talk:San Cristóbal Canton

message: Sport Fishing in the Galapagos Islands 
"Sport fishing" is not a legal activity in the Galapagos Marine Reserve. However, there is a fishing activity, available to visitors, that is legal and sanctioned by the Galapagos National Park. Its called "Pesca Vivencial", in English: "Vivencial Fishing". With Vivencial Fishing, you can employ generally the same techniques and catch most of the same species that you would pursue with Sport Fishing, however, there are several important distinctions, including but not limited to the following: 
> The activity is restricted to a small number of boats and owners who are already licensed to fish in the Reserve and are, moreover, specifically licensed by the Galapagos National Park to offer Vivencial Fishing. 
> You cannot target shark or rays.
> Spearfishing is forbidden.
> There is more emphasis on "catch and release" - You can keep up to 50lbs of fish from each excursion for immediate consumption. All other fish should be released. The fish cannot be sold.
> All billfish (meaning primarily marlin) must be released. So there is no extraction of trophy or potential record fish.
> The regulations limit the size and power of participating boats.
The activity is described on the Galapagos National Parks website at: www.galapagospark.org/nophprg.php?page=reserva_marina_manejo_pesquero_pesca_vivencial&set_lang=en
Galeodan (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

message: I see somewhere a suggestion that "San Cristobal Canton" be merged with "San Cristobal" and that San Cristobal Canton is coterminus (SIC) with San Cristobal. I don't know how this should be resolved but I can advise that the canton of San Cristobal comprises two islands: San Cristobal and Floreana. 
Galeodan (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canton San Cristobal
Talk:Kumho BMW Championship

message: I'm very disturbed that results of the championship from previous years are being removed as new results are added.  Wikipedia isn't a newspaper that has to keep up with the latest information only.   We need to preserve the results from previous years for historical and research purposes.   People come to Wikipedia precisely to answer questions like "Who won such-and-such contest in 2005?"  SteveBaker (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are we removing results from previous years? 
Talk:Mauretania Caesariensis

message: One of my most respected sources, Bruce Gordan's Regnal Chrononlogies, makes a mention in his entry for the city of Constantine in north Africa. And Euratlas' maps of Europe in 500 AD and 600 AD both show a "Kingdom of the Romans and Moors in Algeria, not under Vandal control.
They also show a distinct "Mauri" kingdom in Morrocco.
Would it be plausible to then say that part of the Western Empire survived the fall of Nepos and Syagrius? I unfortunately don't yet have more information, and wanted to bring it to your mutual attentions. It would make a very interesting note in this and a few other articles... Respectfully, Thomas Lessman (talk) 07:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We found some information, shown on the Praetorian Prefecture of Africa, Conflict with Kingdom of Garmul.  I'd like to include a short mention and link to this, as it gives some info about what happened to this area after the fall of Rome, but before the establishment of the Exarchate. Interesting info to help the readers get a better understanding of the area... Thomas Lessman (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Romano-Byzantine rule survived in Algeria during Vandal occupations?
Talk:Noricum

message: I did some smaller adds to the article Xandl Hofer (talk) 18:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I deleted the reference to Neumarkt (Enc. Britannica of 1911!). The link to Noreia should do.--Marschner (talk) 14:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Noreia/Neumarkt?

message: Hello,
I wonder if it could be a good idea to add a link to the web page I have created on Noricum's place names and their etymology . Similarly to the other pages of my site, this page contains both original material and reference to other scholarly work. In particular, a map tha could be later wikified.
Thanks, --Asciatopo (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place names
Talk:Pamphylia

message: Why not add Tribonian, the architect of the Justinian Code?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopyfeathers (talk • contribs) 22:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous people from Pamphylia
Talk:Pisidia

message: The user with the IP 110.20.112.190 
operates vandalism on Wikipedia pages. Filia Angel (talk) 11:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention!!!  

message: The article almost completely lacks references. Any new or experienced editor invited to to start adding refs, and if necessary adjust the article to match what the refs say.
There has been some edit warring between the terms 'Hellenistic' and 'Macedonian'. Without references there's no way for an uninvolved editor to determine which is more appropriate. Wikipedia should use whichever term is used by the majority of mainstream, reliable, and academic sources. This should be viewed from a global perspective, and not sources selected from one country in the dispute. Alsee (talk) 09:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources and 'Hellenistic' vs 'Macedonian' 

message: I don't think so the maps are showing Pisidia at the correct place. Especially the first map. (The red letters of the "Pisidia" word are surely partly within Lycia. The listed settlements and the Taurus Mountains are to the east / north east of this label. Even the second, more detailed map seems incorrect. Ronuh, 21 December 2022  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.106.105 (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect maps
Talk:Zorzi

message: It turns out we have two articles on this family; this one is the older, and also has the same form of the name as most of the more notable members, so suggest merging here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are different families, why can't you find something better than a website which fails our criteria as a source? You may be correct, but we need reliable sources, not websites. We need to be able to show the differences, explain them. Doug Weller talk 10:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Doug Weller talk: answering to you. That Zorzi and Georgi are synonymous is confirmed by I. Mahnken, Dubrovacki patricijatu XIV veku, I: pp. 213 and 225. Please check.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.26.227.130 (talk) 21:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Giorgi family]]
Talk:Solidarity unionism

message: Labor Law for the Rank and Filer is a resource for solidarity unionism. Probably worthwhile to merge this article with Members-only_unionism (or minority unionism). Since these are all similar terms for the same concept. https://archive.iww.org/about/solidarityunionism/explained/ ~ Shushugah (talk) 22:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention Labor Law for Rank and Filers 

message: Reason: from all the sources I can find on the internet, (maybe there is somewhere better to find sources?) the term "solidarity unionism" seems to have been created by Staughton Lynd, who wrote a book about it: Solidarity Unionism: Rebuilding the Labor Movement from Below (1992) and also wrote a book encouraging the concept be used at Starbucks: Solidarity Unionism at Starbucks (2011).
The Industrial Workers of the World seem to be the only organization that supports and promotes this model of organizing:  
I can't find ANY mentions of this model of union/organizing outside these two locations; (the Alphabet Workers Union called themselves this, referencing IWW) and so it seems to me as a theoretical type of organizing that has not caught on or fallen into unnecessary/obsolete after the 1935 US National Labor Relations Act. 
But I have very little knowledge of labor history, so someone well versed in that area may be able to find enough sources to keep this as a standalone article?  It seems to have stayed this size since creation in 2007. ---Avatar317(talk) 22:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge TO [[Members-only unionism]]
Talk:Greek Heroic Age

message: I'll remove the overlinked-template. The problem of this article is not that it has too many links. Perhaps it can be argued that it should have more text. 
The problem with this article is probably that the name "Heroic Age" is misleading. First of all, the heroic age varies in different native literatures (Encyclopedia Britannica). This article should have been called "The Greek Heroic Age" e.g. And even then, we would expect an in-depth article about the ancient Greek world (politics, life, art etc.) in this era called the Heroic Age. Instead, all we get is a list of its heroes. Perhaps the best name for this article would have been "Heroes of the Greek Heroic Age". Debresser (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe if we can can inporve the article, a better name could be the Greek Heroic Age or the Ancient Greek Heroic Age. Kyriakos (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would be the best thing, but depends on some serious improvements. As it is now, this is just a list of Heroes of the Greek heroic Age. Debresser (talk) 23:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  So that makes it a stub then. Either way, "Heroic Age" is still just wrong. Chris Weimer (talk) 06:47, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinked or misnamed 

message: Where does he fit into all this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.151.65.237 (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perseus 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rockethound (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology
Talk:Logrolling (sport)

message: merge/redirect these articles asap.--Tainter 14:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: So what are the safety aspects of this? Do people wear helmets, etc? Seems like if you slip and fall off there a good chance you slip off sideways, with your head potentially whacking straight onto the log.
How many injuries have occurred with this sport from head trauma, and how many deaths have occurred from drowning and/or getting knocked unconscious when falling off?
DMahalko (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety details and Injury statistics? 
Talk:Elimiotis

message: If she was indeed from Larissa as stated here and in her article then she was not from Elimeia/Elimiotis but its neighbor to the south, Thessaly. Her name should be dropped from the list of Elimeian notables unless someone has a source making her from Elimeia as well, somehow. —Blanchette (talk) 22:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philinna, Philip II's second wife
Talk:Roman Gaul

message: I can't find this info in the article. Ananiujitha (talk) 18:57, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's a shame this is still a start-class article. Some that should be mentioned (randomly occurring to me) would be Lugdunum (Lyon) and the Sanctuary of the Three Gauls; Narbonne and Nîmes in the South; Augustodunum (Autun); Trier (Germany, but the Treviri were considered a Gallic or Celtic people); and really a dozen others. By the 2nd century CE, Lugdunum was quite a cosmopolitan place. Cynwolfe (talk) 23:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. If we count the Rhine cities too, some were quite large. In later periods, however, some of the older cities in the south shrank considerably, but there's some controversy over how much and why. Ananiujitha (talk) 03:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What were the leading cities and how big were they?
Talk:Diocese of Macedonia

message: I could not locate anywhere verifiable and reliable source for a 'Diocese of Macedonia'. Please provide historical references, relevant contemporary quotes, etc. That would be most appreciated! Politis (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? It should be mentioned, or at least included in a map, in any book concerning the later Roman/early Byzantine Empire... Check out the Notitia Dignitatum for a primary source, or search Google Books for scholarly works... Cheers, Constantine   ✍  18:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source required
Talk:LinuxMCE

message: *More screenshots are needed, different skins with comments/explanation. See sources:
http://wiki.linuxmce.com/index.php/Screenshots
* mention FreeSwitch now that it is available on linuxMCE?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.251.194.18 (talk) 16:02, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requests for article expansion:

message: LinuxMCE is new and so notability is a tough one. I'm fairly sure it will become important though so deleting and then re-adding seems a waste... 213.143.18.224 14:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "...nothing more than a nice repackaging of Pluto for Ubuntu".  Plubuntu?  Alfred Centauri 13:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions:

message: LinuxMCE represents the next level of integration for home automation. It performs all the X10 functionality plus multi-source TV integration and distribution, alarm management, two-way communication with the home via telephony, and with video over telephony.
:@personwhodoesn'tsigntheirposts I would also say it is significant (i mean, its bill gates house but open source!) Ms.henrick (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is a wikipedia policy thats says something is not notable becuase you like it. contrary to that it is very notable and cool! Ms.henrick (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability!?!=

message: This should not be merged - it includes extensive home control and other functions. Plus you can't install it on top of an existing Linux setup - you have to put it in from scratch. TreveXtalk 17:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with MythTV

message: As of Feb 2008, the latest LMCE release is 0710BETA3 and this article refers to the development status as "Production Ready". If the version is 0710BETA3, should the development status not be "Beta"?
S. Morrow (talk) 18:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development status 

message: Has this project not been abandoned? It looks like its latest release was in Nov '16. Dan Dart (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandonment
Talk:Demographic history of Greece

message: There were more people in Greece in 500BC than there are now?
86.93.208.34 (talk) 07:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that makes some sense considering the history. I am not necessarily defending the article but you have to understand Greece has been through some very rough times and many disasters across modern and medieval history. The Greek population, for example, dramatically decreased during the Turkish occupation, we still haven't recovered from that population decline 176.58.137.219 (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article makes no sense 

message: This article is not about the (Demographic history of Greece), the title is misleading, this article is a copy of Population of the Byzantine Empire. Is the subject of the article only the ethnic Greek population of these regions? Or all inhabitants of these areas?  Why is Asia minor added? The numbers are also too high and very exaggerated.DragonTiger23 (talk) 08:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course Asia Minor,as well as other areas, are added. Greeks lived there. And, to clarify, the subject of the article is the ethnic Greek population within and outside of Greek rule. I personally have only written the modern part of the article(after Greek independence) and can assure you the numbers(at least the ones I wrote about)are not exaggerated 176.58.137.219 (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information in the article 

message: The article is written as a personal work. Yet, even a personal work needs sources and references; otherwise, it has no scientific merit. Unless the article is significantly improved, it could be proposed for deletion. -The Gnome (talk) 09:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for deletion nomination
Talk:Chalkokondyles family

message: W. Miller "The last Athenian historian, Laonikos Chalkokondyles"
seems to be
The Last Athenian Historian: Laonikos Chalkokondyles
William Miller
The Journal of Hellenic Studies
Vol. 42, Part 1 (1922), pp. 36-49 (14 pages)
Published By: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies
But I can't find K. Kambouroglou's "The Chalcocondylis" at all. 93.228.188.205 (talk) 18:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature?
Talk:Banitsa (ruins)

message: The Slavic toponyms of places in Greece should be cited as Slavic, because that is the only neutral term. To those who want to call the language "Macedonian", why not "Bulgarian"? ·ΚΕΚΡΩΨ· (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavic ≠ "Macedonian" 

message: *Studia Slavica By Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Nyelvés Irodalomtudományok Osztálya
*Sabrani sachineniya v chetiri toma : Stihotvoreniya : prikazki ... By Asen Raztsvetnikov, Kamen Zidarov
What is referenced here? The name? Also, there are no page numbers.  Andreas  (T) 14:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Social welfare model

message: I guess the USA is characterised as Anglo-Saxon but it is not mentioned in the text except that the welfare state is smaller. I would like to see a clarification on that point! --John Ericson 14:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: USA is removed from text so this is solved. --John Ericson (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is USA's social model Anglo-Saxon or its own? 

message: The majority of this article (without citations) paints social spending as wealth redistribution to the poor, while making the case that a low-tax, small-government ideology is superior. It reads that lowering taxes is better for important things, while high taxes primarily helps people who don't work. It then makes a reference to "recent studies" (without citing them) to show evidence that social spending led to vast unemployment in France. These are Ron Paul style talking points. 94.222.176.172 (talk) 07:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whole thing reads like some sort of libertarian propaganda. I'll do some cleaning up. 88.193.107.106 (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute 

message: There is no concept called a "social model" to describe a country's political economy and value system. The subject matter of this article is actually the "social welfare model" since it describes the social policies and welfare philosophies of major developed capitalist countries. I propose moving the article from "Social model" to "Social welfare model". -Battlecry 06:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research - Moving page? 

message: this paragraph begins with how the british model got its name. shouldn't subsistence level be at the top?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.212.65.6 (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  shouldn't subsistence level be at the top, instead of boring readers with tautologies?