lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Book of Abramelin

message: I've removed the Criticism section because it is original research and speculation cobbled together by . A criticism section may only report the explicit criticism of published authors. It may not synthesize a criticism based on materials which weren't intended by their original authors as criticism, nor may it engage in historical speculation and arrive at the conclusions of a Wikipedia editor. All conclusions must be cited to an author whose works have been published by a reliable publisher. Skyerise (talk) 13:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section removed 

message: Not going to do this right away, but if these sections don't get citations, they will have to be deleted. Skyerise (talk) 15:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Skyerise (talk) It's worse most of what exists as sources in the article is simply wrong, like on very easily checkable stuff. First off, most of this article comes from Dehn's book directly, which I own in German, which is not an academic work at all. Just as an example this page – like Dehn's book – speaks of a "Codex Guelfibus" in Wolfenbüttel, no such codex exists, what does exist is the very famous Codex Guelferbytanus, which is shortened to "cod. guelf." but Dehn does not cite any part of this existing manuscript in his bibliography, he cites a fictional one. To the reliability of this work in his introduction to the second edition Dehn states that his lack of a critical apparatus was critiqued, so he added footnotes despite those offending his aesthetic sensibilities, these footnotes consist mostly of etymologies and references for "spells" which he believes to be bible verses, while those mostly concerned with manuscript variations are in English for Mather's edition and sometimes Hebrew for the Oxford one, for the text from this quoted non-existent codex they're all in modern high German as is the rest of the text, obviously the main problem here is that Dehn may suggest he translated all of this freely, but just in terms of acceptable academical standards unsourced quotes in a completely anachronistic language just don't inspire much confidence in this whole thing. I could go on but I hope you understand the problem with essentially just quoting from this work on Wikipedia. In addition to this, one file from the German article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_von_Worms which was added to this article, and according to the German Wikipedia edit summaries uploaded on behalf of another user, by Hopsee from the supposed original 1725 manuscript and not either the 1853 or 1920 reprint, which is also referenced by Scholem in Bibliographia Kabbalistica, has some anachronistic features like the spelling "Köln" as Olaf Simons already pointed out in the file's Wikimedia description. Pari Sarcinator (talk) 03:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pari Sarcinator. So fix it! Skyerise (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several sections are completely unreferenced
Talk:Xerox

message: Xerox also operates call centers for other companies, possibly through subsidiaries. I personally used to work in a Xerox call center, doing customer service for Verizon. I don't know where or whether this would fit in the article, but I still figured it should at least be mentioned here. →Twentydragon 02:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call centers
Talk:Eric A. Meyer

message: :I know this has long past, but Eric Meyer is a God amonst web developers. -b 22:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further comment 

message: While he has many "fans" (myself included), the title "...internet legend..." which appears with other official titles seems a little much. JosephSzymborski (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity & Tone 

message: "His daughter Rebecca Alison Meyer died on June 7th, 2014 on her 6th birthday, less than a year after her diagnosis of grade 3 (anaplastic) astrocytoma, a brain tumor." - Unfortunately, Wikipedia can never be a proper encyclopedia, because instances like this so frequently happen. I rely on Wikipedia as a great source of information on trivial matters, but it fails for most scholarly issues. I am not trying to minimize anything about the death of Eric Mayer's daughter. But it does not belong in an encyclopedia. 75.165.47.97 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the death of his daughter, sad though it is, has little encyclopedic value in itself. But the fact that "all the Web community" (including Mozilla, Apple, Google and Microsoft) voted to have a CSS colour value named after her is highly uncommon. I think this also serves as an indicator of Meyer's standing within that community. So I would suggest this be kept.--MichielN (talk) 16:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not encyclopedic 
Talk:Molybdenum

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Molybdenom. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Molybdenom" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Molybendium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Molybendium" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Dimolybdenum and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 20#Dimolybdenum until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 13:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dimolybdenum" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Igor Tamm

message: The Igor Tamm article says that he was a mentor to Leonid Isaakovich Mandelshtam "in science and in life," while the Leonid Isaakovich Mandelshtam article says that he was a mentor to Igor Tamm.  Since Mandelshtam was 16 years older than Tamm, it's probably just Mandelshtam who was a mentor to Tamm, unless the relationship was something other than that of a mentor.
The article now reads: "Tamm was born in Vladivostok... in an Estonian family migrated to the Far East". Being Tamm's great-grandson I know for sure that it is (the Estonian part) 100% wrong.
Tamm was 25% German (from where his last name comes from), 25% Russian, 25% Ukrainian, and 25% Georgian, as far as I know.
Moreover, original Latin transliteration of his family name was Thamm (or even Tham), he changed it himself while studying in Edinburgh. The result happened to coincide with a common Estonian family name - thus the "Estonian trace".
Finally, I'm not sure that the family "migrated to the Far East". In fact, Tamm's father was appointed  as a bridge engineer during the construction of the Trans-Siberian railway, and returned to Ukraine immediately after the work was done.
Yours sincerely,
Mikhail Tamm
195.91.218.129 11:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed to cat for Estonian descent. Matthew_hk tc 22:54, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Estonians

message: : I regret that I don't have a reference for this quotation (apparently said by Igor Tamm) to hand! This is regrettable, because I have seen a very similar quotation attributed to Werner von Braun! Nevertheles, here it is:
:::"Research is what I'm doing, when I don't know what else I'm doing."
: Hair Commodore (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation 

message: The following Russian websites have been used as references, and it's difficult for me to assess whether or not they are reliable sources. Can someone please describe the nature and reliability of http://gimn1567.ru/ , http://elib.biblioatom.ru/ , http://www.famhist.ru/ , and http://www.peoples.ru/ ? Perhaps User:Galassi? Jayjg (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: These look pretty reliable. All russophone bios of Tamm state that he was born into German and Russian noble family, unequivocally nonJewish, so much so that his father was classified as volksdeutsche and was untouched during German WW2 occupation.--Galassi (talk) 13:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  What does "look pretty reliable" mean, though? Can you tell me more about these sites? Jayjg (talk) 12:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian websites
Talk:Christy Gibson

message: Christy Gibson has sold many albums in Thailand, appears regularly on Thai TV, and has her own show. She may not be "notable" in the USA, but she certainly is in Thailand. The article should stay and the template should be removed. --Thorwald (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs verifiable references from reliable sources to confirm her notability. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 13:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why attempt to make a point about not being known in the USA? She isn't from USA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.25.208.8 (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Samoth

message: This page has seen way too much vandalism. We can revert it to a more meaning version, or it may be better just to delete it. No so much an important page anyway.
Right. Delete it in its entirety. Who would care about this obscure satanist anyhow?
: Everyone who values the evolution of the underground blak metal scene.
::Who says he's a satanist anyway? No references... Wyglif SMS 22:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs more detail. I am considering redoing it from scratch as it is currently a mess of facts. Any oposition?
This article should be deleted and forgotten.
:No argument if you're planning on redoing it.  i'm curious if anyone knows the source of the comment which says that Samoth denied ever drumming for satyricon, because the liner notes of nemesis divina clearly say he did.  any thoughts?  137.99.117.136 (talk) 23:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coke is better than pepsi
Talk:List of universities in Poland

message: To all whom it may concern: there's a Template:Infobox Polish University for use on all Polish universitarian pages. See Template talk:Infobox Polish University for more details. Halibutt 00:18, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
Missing academies/universities of art? See :pl:Akademie sztuk pięknych w Polsce.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  23:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Should we add it? If so, in which section? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: * We can iclude it under "Universities of economics". Please note, official name in Polish is Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego. As it is mentioned in the lead (quote): "...some of the institutions might choose to translate their own name as university in English, even if they do not officially have the Polish-language equivalent name of uniwersytet." This is one of those cases I believe, although I did not examine the quality and impartiality of our references. See also: Warsaw School of Economics. Most Western universities have faculties of business administration only. Poeticbent talk 06:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kozminski University]] 
Talk:Windsport

message: I created the windsports entry since Chris Muller, son of one of the hang gliding pioneers has labelled his operation as a windsport company. 
This term is being used throughout all wind powered recreation.
Should this be a dismbiguity page?
:This article is very similar to air sports.  GilliamJF 07:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree strongly with any merger.  In air sports the participants leave the ground, except model aircraft contests.   (I have my doubts about model aircarft being included but the FAI disagrees.)  Some of the windsport activities may use the wind but this does make them an aerial sport.  Indeed most of the air sports do not rely on the wind: eg the three forms of gliding mainly use thermals, and parachutists would prefer the wind never blew at all. JMcC 10:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chernihiv Oblast

message: the city Shernigone (Chernigov) was an ancient Lithuanian city like and Kuningardas (Kiev), and later was occupied by Rus people. Shernigone in Lithuanian language means the chase/hunt of boars. As well as Pryluky (Prielaukiai meaning 'at the fields').  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.222.112.200 (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient Lithuanian city Shernigone

message: Is Slavutych really in this Oblast, as this article claims? It's also listed in the Kiev Oblast template. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 17:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been answered in Slavutych article; it is physically, but not administratively. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 21:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Towns

message: According to this maplandia search, Ivangorod is a place name associated with Chernihivska. In this Wikipedia, Ivangorod appears only as a city in Russia near Estonia. "Ivangorod, Ukraine" appears on the website of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a location of Einsatzgruppen killings. I'm interested in information that will differentiate and clarify these place names. -- Deborahjay (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivangorod 
Talk:Kharkiv Oblast

message: People, please, HELP ME!
When I push Borova in the list of cities of our Oblast, I get to the article about foreign city. Who can correct it? We must create the article about ukrainian town!!--Максим Коршунов (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now when you go to Borova it will be a disambiguation page.  You can write about the Ukrainian town at Borova (Kharkiv Oblast). Thanks, Ostap 20:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article requires re-writing to reflect the new structure of raions and hromadas which in 2020 replaced the former more complex structure that existed from Soviet times. I don't mind if the former units are tabulated somewhere, but the article should contain and tabulate details of the areas and populations of the current administrative divisions. Note in particular that there are no longer any independent cities of oblast importance; all have now been restructured within the new raions. Rif Winfield (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organisation of table of raions needed to reflect the 2020 Reforms 
Talk:Kherson Oblast

message: Most of the region is under Russia's control. Not the whole region. Simply not true. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kherson_military%E2%80%93civilian_administration 82.15.56.134 (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the whole region 

message: I am expecting some people to come up with the idea of renaming this article to Kherson Oblast (Ukraine) now that we have Kherson Oblast (russia). Think twice. The vast, huge majority of English sources still refer to the Ukrainian administrative unit when referring to the name "Kherson Oblast". Such a move would only serve to create a false balance between Ukraine and russia, unwarranted due to russia's illegal and violent annexation of the region, which I believe would look more justified here in Wikipedia with such a move. Super Ψ Dro 08:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article will not be moved 

message: Kherson (de jure)
Novovorontsovka (de facto) Qexypnos (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital of Kherson oblast 

message: In the History>Russian Invasion secttion please change 
"On 27 July 2022 the Ukrainian army destroyed the Antonovsky Bridge, as part of its wider campaign to isolate the Russian 49th Combined Arms Army on the right bank of the Dnipro river.
On 31 August it was reported that the defenders of the ill-gotten Kherson territory were the 49CAA and what was left of the 35CAA."
to
"On 27 July 2022 the Ukrainian army destroyed the Antonovsky Bridge, as part of its wider campaign to isolate the Russian 49th Combined Arms Army on the right bank of the Dnipro river. Elements of the Russian 35th Combined Arms Army later reinforced Kherson.", leaving the sources there. The current version is not neutral or enciclopediac.
Dakane2 (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Add the romanization for Russian name ~Fuffi-Marie~ (go talk) 13:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Staraction (talk | contribs) 05:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 March 2024
Talk:Kirovohrad Oblast

message: I know I am not part of Project Ukraine, but I was researching Ukraine in my free time and the article says that Kirovohrad was officially renamed. If that is the case, then shouldn't the page be moved to Kropyvnytskyi Oblast? TheFreezerFlame  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFreezerFlame (talk • contribs) 21:37, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The oblast (province) is not renamed yet. Only the city was renamed. In order to rename the oblast it is necessary to change the Constitution; the process of the changing began, but did not finish yet. Moreover now there is state of emergency (war) in Ukraine and changing the Constitution is forbidden during state of emergency. --D.M. from Ukraine (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kropyvnytskyi 
Talk:Ternopil Oblast

message: This article needs some slight reworking as it does not read good English. (Are there some 500 caves of which only 100 are known etc?) Jackiespeel (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost in translation
Talk:Virginia Commonwealth University

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that thumbnail images in this article have their size specified in pixels. Our image use policy explicitly says: "Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. |thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting. [emphasis in original]"
If this editor has an objection to this policy or a "very good reason" to specify the size of thumbnail images in this article in pixels, they are invited to discuss that here. But merely making these edits with no discussion whatsoever, not even edit summaries, is not acceptable in this collaborative project. ElKevbo (talk) 02:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumbnail image size
Talk:Second Coming

message: According to the article: How can Jesus be THE Messiah but also only A prophet? THE puts him above all others while A prophet is just one figure among many. How can Muslims believe that Mary was a virgin while being pregnant with Jesus while denying him the title "son of God"?? If Jesus has no biological father which Christians and Muslims both agree on who else could be the father to Jesus other than God? Clearly if you believe that Mary was a virgin you have to accept God as father and creator of Jesus. 93.206.54.181 (talk) 02:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic contradictions 

message: The German article Parusie
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parusie lists  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parousia as English equivalent, which forwards to Second Coming. There is no path back from Second Coming to Parusie through the language menu. 78.102.93.178 (talk) 10:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to German article? 

message: Would someone with experience with  please fix these? They are in Second Coming#Terminology Second Coming#References as "(Stephanas, Fortunatus and Achaicus,[3] Titus,[4] and Paul the Apostle[5])". The links seem to work OK, but there is a big red "Template:Bibleverse with invalid book" which inhibited me from clicking on the link. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibleverse link (false?) errors 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_Jesus%27s_death#cite_note-Reynolds_2009-3 is a good source that the second coming is believed in amongst us Muslims too. It is also found in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_views_on_Jesus%27s_death#:~:text=Unlike%20the%20Christian%20view%20of,Coming%20in%20the%20End%20days.
2001:8003:2953:1900:5CDF:6EF1:F077:BE90 (talk) 02:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The article already has a section on the Second Coming as it relates to Islam. If you would like to add information, feel free to do so. pillowcrow 20:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic view.
Talk:Time Crisis 3

message: Sorry ya'll, I mistook the shotgun round limit in Time Crisis 3 with the round limit in Rainbow 6.  Thanks for the correction. TomStar81 03:56, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't bold text unless it has to be something that you need to bring the attention to.  I also had to categorize the characters so that I can state out any main protagonists, supporting protagonists, etc. in order to keep up with categorization here in Wikipedia.  I am going to watch this article carefully so that editing would be done in a moderate fashion. -- Vesther 19:09, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text Bolding Etiquette 

message: This narrative is waaaay too long and the tone is not right - it needs to be cut down significantly. --Charlesknight 21:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative
Talk:Norteña

message: Should this not be merged with Norteño (music)?
:It should be merged because "Norteña" is another name for "Norteño," which is the most commonly used term. Besides, the content seems to be only a summary of the Norteño article. I'm now merging this article. - Stevey7788 23:55, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Io (moon)

message: Galileo himself noted that Marius used the Julian calendar while Galileo used the Gregorian one.
This is not made clear as it is. Of course, the two calendars and the different parties using them are well known.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.0.234 (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The date of Galileo's publication, 1610, is not logical proof that he made any observations before Marius. Galileo's direct argumentation should be used. I think his argumentation is indeed proof that he did have priority, not that it is very important.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.0.234 (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Logical or not, publication was traditionally used to determine priority as it was the first evidence that was available to people in general (and possibly because it encouraged people to publish?)  
IceDragon64 (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: There are some issues with the article including over a dozen cn tags, some  issues (the ones that I found are marked in the article), and some verifiability issues with page ranges of 20 pages or more. (t · c) buidhe 08:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020|FA sweeps]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved – consensus here seems skeptical of the idea that the moon is the primary topic.  ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 20:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 September 2023
Talk:OSF/1

message: "Intellectual property" can be a loaded word.  Is there any reason we don't simply say "...now belongs to Hewlett-Packard."?
Also, I don't really care for the expression "became known as Digital Unix".  That makes it sound like the users decided to call it that.  IIRC, Digital simply renamed it.  Is my memory right?  Why not simply "and renamed 'Digital Unix'."?
:Good points - I also tinkered to make it flow a little better; notabilities to lead, and more of a continuous narrative for history. Earlier writers probably found it hard to explain, because both OSF/1 and Dunix existed simultaneously. Stan 13:21, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)