Talk:Anharmonicity

message: "Large-angle pendulum" 
No pendulum (phase space with \theta and \dot{\theta}) can go chaotic by Poincare-Bendixon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.87.57.32 (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the thing about chaotic pendulum motion. Someone got "large angle pendulum" confused with "double jointed pendulum". Norbornene (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

text: You are right that that section is too terse and unclear. I fixed the inconsistent function notation, but the mathematical content itself is beyond me to fix. Norbornene (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anharmonicity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613171204/http://monet.physik.unibas.ch/~elmer/pendulum/nonres.htm to http://monet.physik.unibas.ch/~elmer/pendulum/nonres.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Article says:
"When x is too positive or too negative, gravity pushes it back towards its lowest point."
A non-zero value can either be positive or negative, it's a binary property. Saying x can be "too positive" is nonsense. Also gravity doesn't push anything. Gravity causes the weight of the pendulum to be pulled towards earth and the combination with the centripetal force from the string results in the "corrective" force that affects the pendulum.
It should be rewritten to something like:
"For example, x may represent the displacement of a pendulum from its resting position x=0. As the absolute value of x increases, so does the restoring force acting on the pendulums weight that pushes it back towards its resting position."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.206.244.20 (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imprecise Language 

message: My edit has been removed despite being valid and of scientific evidence. The justification wasn't understandable in any form because it hasn't to do anything with a point of view. 178.10.96.237 (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true in reality that any system which oscillates linearly becomes nonlinear at high amplitudes. I would call this the nonlinear regime, where force is nonlinearity with respect to position, and I honestly can't tell how this is different from "anharmonicity". I guess "nonlinear" describes the force function whereas "anharmonic" describes the spectral behavior. So the 2 words describe the same thing from different perspectives.98.156.185.48 (talk) 03:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  All oscillating systems are more or less anharmonic. 

message: Aren't these systems creating intermdoulation and harmonics? 88.72.82.12 (talk) 09:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is no description on how such systems exactly behave, like chaos for example.