lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maxillary nerve

message: I reverted the -nonref edit by User:Arcadian generally because in doing so, the reference was removed and made less verifiable. There should be a list of sources along with shorthand references to the text generally because leaving the shorthand doesn't credit the book correctly. J O  R D A N [talk ] 18:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert on 05 March, 2008 
Talk:Corpora arenacea

message: Corpora arenacea are distinct from corpora amylacea, but they might be the same thing as psammoma bodies.  If they are, should we merge this page with the psammoma body page? Example of a source equating them as the same: 
Would be helpful to have input on this from Pathologists and/or Histologists. Myoglobin (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Just heard from a Pathologist I know locally; they explained that corpora arenacea are calcium concretions not associated with any cell death/pathological changes, while psammoma bodies usually are caused by cell death.  So, it seems they are likely different and perhaps that source above is making the same mistake I did.  Anyone who finds additional evidence to the contrary should post here, else I'll stop looking into this. Myoglobin (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Psammoma Bodies?
Talk:Mitral cell

message: The link to eMedicine appears completely useless: 
Search Results:
2 articles on "mitral cell" found.
Result Pages: 1
Page 1 of 1
''
Searching for mitral gives exactly two occurrences, none of them linking to an article. Ben  T/C  09:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links
Talk:Deep fibular nerve

message: Can readily be merged. Will improve readability, by having all the information in one place, hopefully increase future editing, and benefit readers by reducing needless fragmentation. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Lateral terminal branch of deep fibular nerve]] 

message: As above Tom (LT) (talk) 22:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Medial terminal branch of deep fibular nerve]]
Talk:Central canal

message: Would be better presented on Central canal of spinal cord as a subtopic which would give more overall coverage Iztwoz (talk) 09:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Central gelatinous substance of spinal cord]] 

message: A small stub which would be better presented as a subtopic of Central canal of spinal cord for a more complete overview Iztwoz (talk) 09:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Gray commissure]] 

message: A small stub better presented as a subtopic of Central canal of spinal cord avoiding duplication of content and unnecessary fragmentation Iztwoz (talk) 09:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Terminal ventricle]]
Talk:Geniculate ganglion

message: It says in the article that somatosensory and taste fibers synapse in the ganglion. But as I understand it, the cell bodies are in the ganglion, but there are no synapses. Those are pseudounipolar sensory neurons, similar to those of the Dorsal Root Ganglia. Can anyone clarify? Wikiation (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synapses in the geniculate ganglion
Talk:Inferior gluteal nerve

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*WP:MED does not cover anatomy, tag removed
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]

message: Hello. I am a student in Dr. Potter's Intro to Neuroscience at Georgia Institute of Technoology. I am currently editing this article as a project. NadiaMichelleKhan (talk) 00:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Student editor
Talk:Glabellar reflex

message: Unnecessary fragmentation of the same basic concept. Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 11:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - appears to be a duplication. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Oppose - It is not a duplication. This page refers to the primitive reflex present in newborns while the Myerson's sign is a clinical finding in adults suffering from dementia where this reflex, previously inhibited, is found again due to frontal release.Tinss (talk) 05:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Myerson's sign]]
Talk:Iliohypogastric nerve

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*WP:MED does not cover anatomy, tag removed
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 21:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Ilioinguinal nerve

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
*WP:MED does not cover anatomy, tag removed
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 21:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]
Talk:Lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh

message: Google Ngram shows that "lateral femoral cutaneous nerve" is a far more common name in the literature than "lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh" or "lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh". There may be grounds for renaming the article as per WP:COMMONNAME. However, "lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh" is the common name given by Terminologia Anatomica.
Unfortunately, Ngram only allows phrases with 5 or fewer words, so "lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh" was tested as "lateral cutaneous nerve of the" - this could refer to a few other nerves (such as forearm and calf), but even these combined are much less commonly mentioned than "lateral femoral cutaneous nerve". Bibeyjj (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Falx cerebelli

message: Possible sources for edit information:
Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Shokouhi GH, Ashrafian A, Oakes WJ. Abstract presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: 2006. A triple dural-venous variation in the posterior cranial fossa: A duplicated plus accessory falx cerebelli and an aberrant venous sinus.
Nayak, B. Satheesha, Sirasanagandla Srinivasa Rao, R. Deepthinath, and Naveen Kumar. "Triple Falx Cerebelli Associated with Two Aberrant Venous Sinuses in the Floor of Posterior Cranial Fossa." The Australasian Medical Journal. Australasian Medical Journal, n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2015. 
Carlson, Neil R. Physiology of Behavior. 11th ed. Vol. 1. N.p.: Pearson Education, n.d. Print.
Dstrock4 (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Y. C. James Yen

message: I agree that his nickname should be included, but tried to avoid confusing it with his formal name cwh 05:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Medial cutaneous nerve of arm

message: It seems that there is a nerve of Wrisberg that's part of the facial nerve (see Facial Nerve Anatomy)—should there be a distinction made here? Bobjgalindo (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I've made the change. --Arcadian (talk) 18:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nerve of Wrisberg
Talk:11-cell

message: On the 2nd row 1st cell, the colors blue and purple seem need be switched.
Chin Yeh (talk) 16:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 11 cells on the 1st diagram 

message: How do you paste hemi-icosahedra together? Surely they can't be made in the real world, which has the wrong topology for that (at the human scale, at least)! Double sharp (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "constructed by pasting hemi-icosahedra together" 

message: In the diagram "Hemi-icosahedron_coloured.svg", I think there is a mistake. The six cells surrounding the "t" vertex are coloured red, blue, oink, yellow, orange and grey. However, the diagram for the yellow cell has a purple face adjacent to the "t" vertex. By elimination, I think it should be blue. Apt1002 (talk) 19:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in diagram?
Talk:Inferior parietal lobule

message: Worth mentioning that this region was found to be abnormal in Albert Einstein's brain. Witelson, S. F.; Kigar, D. L.; Harvey, T. Lancet 1999, 353, 2149-53.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.30.25 (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Anterior commissure

message: This section seems to be missing some text about the work of LeVay. The name suddenly pops up in the sentence: ' this study has "many of the same interpretive difficulties as LeVay's" '. We need to know what that work was to make real sense of what is being said.
Myrvin (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That material was added by an IP editor in March 2008.  The Byne and Parsons ref must be to .  Beyond that, I disavow all knowledge of this topic. Looie496 (talk) 21:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Please feel free to fix the problems that you see -- even if it means simply removing material that doesn't belong here.  (Just make sure that you use edit summaries when you save your edits, so that other editors can see the reasons for your actions.)  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

text: I've put back the edits by me that were deleted. Myrvin (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Not me boss. Myrvin (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

text: However, it was me who added the details of the later research that you have removed. I don't see what is so wrong with that. Is there some rule you have about not including details of cited sources? I thought they were interesting. It would be better if you were properly signed in if you are going to make large edits. Myrvin (talk) 09:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Seeing no response to my argument, I have put the details back. Myrvin (talk) 07:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexuality 
Talk:Savage Model 110

message: Savage 110 BA and Savage 110FP seem to just be variants of this model - in which case they should be included here. Comments? AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale for the redirect was: "#REDIRECT Savage_Arms#Bolt-action_rifles - not otherwise notable / wp:promo; redirect to section in parent company". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense. You're not going to convince anyone that a subject that gets 5+ million ghits that it's not notable. And yet again, we see a misunderstanding of policy (i.e., WP:PROMO) being used to justify your edits. Parsecboy (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Lower subscapular nerve

message: If the origin of the subscapular nerve is the posterior cord of the brachial plexus, and the posterior cord is formed by the posterior division of the three trunks (superior, medial and inferior) which in turn are formed by the five roots of the brachial plexus, how come the superior subscapular (or the thoracodorsal and inferior subscapular for that matter) are not said to be originated from all of the five roots?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.202.249.82 (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the other roots?
Talk:South San Diego

message: The author confuses South San Diego proper--which is part of the City of San Diego located at the south end of San Diego Bay, east of Imperial Beach and stretching to the Mexican border--with what is usually known as "South Bay" or "South County."  South San Diego does not have any cities within it, since it is part of the City of San Diego itself.  The San Ysidro neighborhood is part of South San Diego.  --71.104.17.242 08:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  South San Diego is part of the City of San Diego 

message: While quite of bit of interesting and useful information is included in this article, I will move it to the South Bay, San Diego section, where it belongs.
South San Diego encompasses the following communities only: Egger Highlands, Nestor, Palm City, Otay Mesa and San Ysidro.
It does not include any areas of Chula Vista, National City or Imperial Beach (all of which are used here).
Ljmajer (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite/Removal of incorrect information. 

message: Bonita is not located in the South Bay, as Chula Vista makes up Bonita's entire western border. In other words, Bonita doesn't touch the bay, therefore it isn't part of the bay. 72.199.182.210 (talk) 23:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bonita
Talk:Ellet J. Waggoner

message: I would like to suggest some improvements for the new section regarding (semi) Arianism. Firstly, it reads more like an essay (which is not policy guidelines), rather than the formal style expected of an encyclopedia. There is a clear point of view (POV) to defend Waggoner, rather than let the facts speak for themselves. It appears that there is little evidence he was Arian - but this should be stated differently. First mention that some have claimed he was Arian (and say who, and give a reference preferably). Then, if this is true, mention who disagrees. Try to pick the most notable sources around. Also remember that there is no reason that Ellen White should have any authority on truth for Wikipedia purposes. However her view on Waggoner is certainly notable (in Adventist-related articles) - but it is just that - one view.
The section is also quite long, and I think a summary would be better. Regards, Colin MacLaurin 05:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arian section 

message: Added unreferenced section tag.Catfurball (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Added tag
Talk:Anterior ethmoidal nerve

message: The picture is of the anterior ethmoidal artery, not the nerve...any reason for that? Theyellowdart22 (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi ! The anterior ethmoidal artery is a fairly minor structure, so there are no specific drawings of its origin. As it follows a similar course to the anterior ethmoidal artery, the image is appropriate. A note has been left in the infobox explaining this. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 17:11, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:INAH 3

message: What does it do? Think that might be important to mention. Ric | opiaterein 20:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: So uh.

message: Please do not edit the page to say that "It has been suggested..." or interpret the findings. First of all, this was not a case study, it involved many subjects. Variables were not controlled in the way they are in experiments in the physical sciences because that is impossible in the social sciences. However, they were accounted for as best they could be. The source that is used states that the findings implicate the area as a substrate with regards to sexual orientation. I never claimed it was the sole source, so your anti-Gay POV is not needed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.236.222 (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are interpreting the findings by saying that some scientific finding 'suggests' something. Scientific discoveries cannot 'suggest' anything by themselves. Only the people who interpret them 'suggest' anything. So what you want the article to say is wrong as a matter of logic. Skoojal (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreements 

message: 'Since I looked at adult brains, we don't know if the differences I found were there at birth, or if they appeared later."' It's there on the page about LeVay. Skoojal (talk) 05:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Levay quote 

message: This article states that the INAH3 is part of the SDN. On the other hand the article on SDN says that the SDN is a  generic name for an Hypothalamus nucleus that is found in many animals, and has different names for different species: INAH3 for humans, oSDN in sheep, SDN-POA in rats, etc. This information is in accordance with Simon LeVay in Gay Straight and the reason Why. As the article on SDN is more elaborated and referenced that the present one, I tend to get credit to Levay. If there are no objections I will proceed to modify this article accordingly.--Auró (talk) 14:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it. Looie496 (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of the Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus?
Talk:General visceral efferent fibers

message: Something is wrong with the wording of the article --it refers to the same fibers as pre-ganglionic & post-ganglionic, all at the same time. Someone who knows what they're doing: please fix :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.15.68 (talk) 01:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Middle meningeal nerve

message: It doesn't seem to make sense. It says this branch is given off immediately after the branching of the maxillary nerve from the trigeminal ganglion, before the maxillary nerve exits the skull via the foramen rotundum (i.e. at this point still within the cranial cavity). Then later the article says that this branch "enters the cranium" via the foramen spinosum. So this nerve leaves the skull and then re-enters it? Please clarify 92.39.75.106 (talk) 12:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Deep petrosal nerve

message: The name sphenopalatine ganglion is only used in lower vertebrates, because most of these do not have a pterygopalatine fossa. In these animals the gnnglion is located in the lower medial part of the orbita
--Morten Møller (talk) 15:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

message: The external link to the eMedicine dictionary is broken. In fact, there appears to be no article on the site about the deep petrosal nerve. Is there anyone who would object to this link being deleted?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhbuehler (talk • contribs) 23:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:Anterior grey column

message: Hi. Can we please remove the "" -tag from this article? To me it does not really make sense to have it here. The only similarity in the two is the both are named anterior horn. Anterior horn does exist and link to both of these two. --JakobSteenberg (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After four months without any responses I have now removed the tag. JakobSteenberg (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also: Anterior horn of lateral ventricle? 

message: Alpha-motor neurons located in the anterior horn of the spinal cord (anterior horn cells) are clustered in a specific pattern. They are found at every segment and are concentrated in the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements.
The medial cell groups are associated with muscles of the spine and trunk. The lateral cell groups are associated with muscles of the extremities
References 
https://neupsykey.com/anterior-horn-cell-and-cranial-motor-neuron-disease/#:~:text=88-1%20Alpha-motor%20neurons,with%20muscles%20of%20the%20extremities. MedHelper+ (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information about anterior horn cells
Talk:Baobhan sith

message: The article does not cite its sources. 
The part where it mentions these creatures emerging from graves does not appear in any of the actual folklore which depicts this as a type of fairy not an undead vampire.
* I think whether this creature is a vampire could be an exceedingly complex discussion - there is a source now for the statement that these entities reside in graves over day. However, this is also true for fairies of anglo-irish-scottish folklore in general. They are a hidden people, residing in "fairy mounds", which are burial hills. The reason for this is that they are races pre-dating current humans, which withdrew to the underworld. Which would make them undead, in a way. However, I'm not certain they actually ever died in those myths, or if they just "shifted dimensions" via magic. If their residence in the underworld makes them undead, then this "fairy" would at least be very close to the definition of a vampire - an undead which drinks blood. The only difference would perhaps be the way she came into existence - via the magic or nature of her race, rather than the "unfortunate circumstances" that lead to humans becoming vampires in vampire myths. Removing her from the vampire category for now. --Ciaraleone (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

message: Where can we add a way to pronounce "Baobhan sith" properly?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.10.46 (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation guide 
Talk:Funiculus (neuroanatomy)

message: According to Gray's anatomy, funiculus is "a small bundle of fibres, enclosed in a tubular sheath; if the nerve is of small size, it may consist only of a single funiculus; but if large, the funiculi are collected together into larger bundles or fasciculi, which are bound together in a common membranous investment" i.e. the epineurium. In this article and another article (Nerve fascicle), the terms are used interchangeably, which I think is wrong. Kindly have a look at this. Thanks. Che (Talkin' Bout A Revolution) 19:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Funiculus (neuroanatomy)|Funiculus]]/[[Nerve fascicle|Fascicle]]
Talk:Anterior spinothalamic tract

message: Who's Iqbal?  Savonnn (talk) 19:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Iqbal's physiology
Talk:Metaplasticity

message: This is a nice article in several respects.  I am assessing it as C class, though, because the writing style is a bit too complex for Wikipedia's target audience, and because it relies too heavily on primary sources.  (A Wikipedia article, unlike an article in a scientific journal, should reference mainly secondary sources such as review papers or textbooks.) Looie496 (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: This section is written as if synaptic tagging were discovered by Young et al. It would be more appropriate to cite Frey and Morris (1997) Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. - Or perhaps delete the whole section, since it is not directly relevant to metaplasticity. 129.115.120.236 (talk) 19:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Synaptic tagging

message: I don't think digital metaplasticity really belongs here. Perhaps it should be moved to a separate article, but seeing how little information there is on the topic, maybe it should be removed completely.  Allethrin (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly looks awkward the way it currently appears. Looie496 (talk) 22:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Digital Metaplasticity

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :(Digital)Metaplasticity and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 4#(Digital)Metaplasticity until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "(Digital)Metaplasticity" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]