Talk:Project Megiddo

message: Next thing you'll be creating some article called Bush as Hitler, or other such claptrap.  The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 07:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CIVIL - Remember to comment on the content, not the author. --NuclearZer0 17:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please stop following me around.  The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 18:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Glass houses and all. --NuclearZer0 03:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For shame

message: Fairness And Accuracy For Friendly People, now you've got me curious.  Can you provide a citation to the actual FBI report -- I'd like to see it.  The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 03:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might have tried Google, Morton ;-) The third result is the PDF  - The one with with the URL  www.fbi.gov/library/megiddo/megiddo.pdf - Cheers - Fairness And Accuracy For All 08:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is not working.  Do you have another?  The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 19:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, a Google News Search reveals zero hits, and an ordinary Google search reveals no mainstream sources -- just blogs.  Are there some legitimate sources out there for this information?  Morton DevonshireYo 03:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Working link. F.F.McGurk 07:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Wasnt there a general warning about purposely mistating peoples names? --NuclearZer0 03:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious

message: This is one out of hundreds or even thousands of FBI reports that have come out. Why does this one garner so much attention? Particularly in the light that nothing came of it! The only attacks planned for the millennium were by al-Qaeda. (Gosh, imagine that!) Seems more like an attempt to paint fundamentalist Christians in a negative light. Jinxmchue 14:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm really trying hard to find the notability of this 

message: Recent edits  have deleted the description of the report as 'controversial', and mention of the ensuing controversy. This is fact and not POV. The Christian Right felt smeared by this report, and they made their voices heard. - Fairness And Accuracy For All 05:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Do you guys thing the origin of the name "megiddo" bears mentioning in this article? Most projects don't list the origin of the name, because frequently they're meaningless and chosen to sound innocuous (IE "project eggplant" for CIA drug experiments, 'paperclip' for the requisitioning of Nazi scientists).  In this case, though, meggido being the hill that's supposedly the site of armageddon (lit. "hill of megaddo"), it might bear mentioning. Wintermut3 18:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and pasted the introduction from the report which explains why the name was chosen.  If you think that is too long then it could just be summerized. Steve Dufour 17:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Does the origin of the name bear mentioning?

message: * 1. 2. 3. F.F.McGurk 07:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a lot of mentions of it as well.  The trouble was that most of them were from conspiracy-theory type sites. The mentions in the main-stream press, like the one from the Washington Post linked in your answer, mostly just reported the existence of the report and didn't go into any details about its importance. Steve Dufour 19:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RS

message: He's the film maker that was defended by the ACLU.  Anyone feel like starting an article on him?  He seems more notable, and interesting too, than lots of people who have WP articles. Steve Dufour 01:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike Zieper

message: Does anyone else see this repeated at the start of the article.  I tried to remove it but does not appear in the edit page.  Some kind of malicious scripting?  Who do we report this to?--Epocalypse2 18:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dumb