Talk:3 Juno

message: Does anyone know the copyright status of the Mt Wilson observatory image 
 that has recently disappeared. Was this deleted by a bot? Deuar 21:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?

message: Juno was listed as 7th, but this appears to be an exaggeration. Check out List of noteworthy asteroids#Largest known asteroids. Apart from ambiguity in how to rank (by mean diameter ~235km [more sensible I think], or longest diameter 290km), there are several bodies which are distinctly larger: 52 Europa, 624 Hektor, 15 Eunomia. Also, 87 Sylvia, 31 Euphrosyne, 16 Psyche, and 65 Cybele are difficult to rank in comparison. Most of these have only a mean diameter given. Deuar 14:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  size rank 

message: The above mentioned image shows as a 'red-link'.
I just uploaded a GIF animation of pictures I took in February
Might this be useful? Awolf002 00:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an image to 3 Juno, it's the view of Juno from Celestia, is it ok?. Cause theres nothing from the Hubblesite -- Legolost EVIL, EVIL!   05:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Celestia? Shimgray | talk | 13:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I will produce a larger (non-cropped) version of the animation, as was requested. I don't know about the Celestia image. This image is pure speculation, is it not? Awolf002 13:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Celestia image is pure speculation, using the standard Celestia asteroid texture.The Singing Badger 13:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus it's spherical, which really doesn't help matters... Shimgray | talk | 13:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  But thats how Celestia's creators view it, spherical, I'm just saying it's the view from celstia. -- Lego@lost EVIL, EVIL! |  03:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is, we don't know many things about Juno, and we don't really know what it looks like. We do, however, know what it doesn't look like - it isn't a sphere like the Celestia image. Sure, any image is better than nothing, but not if that image is actively misleading... Shimgray | talk | 18:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the celestia image is misleading, and should unfortunately be removed. In fact, we do have images of Juno (see the discussion right below), and they're not at all similar. Deuar 15:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: There's a real nice image over at the  Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, taken by the Mt. Wilson telescope. Only question is how to get its copy into the article without a copyright zealot deleting it since it's not from a NASA or gov website. Perhaps it counts as fair use (I'd agree with that, at least), or else maybe permission from the authors can be obtained? Deuar 12:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I uploaded this image twice, because under the terms of an SAO press release it is public domain with proper attribution.  It was deleted twice.  Perhaps I did not specify the copyright properly.  Would one of you like to try?  The image is being used on at least one other Wikipedia.Michaelbusch 14:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks like it requires sending some sort of email to them asking nicely, and hoping. Deuar 15:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The image concerned is in an SAO press release, meaning that it is intended to be freely distributed with proper attribution, assuming fair use.  Does that make it GDFL compliant? Michaelbusch 00:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Ive reviewed the article and deemed it ready for GA, i did on the other hand make 2 edits as information was incorrect. Though the article is quite short, im well aware that there isnt all that much info on Juno. anyway well done guys -- Nbound 11:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA

message: Judging by these 19th century drawings, it appears that Juno's symbol has been simplified. I'd like to add a brief discussion of this in, as with 4 Vesta, but am not sure where to put it. Suggestions?
P.S. I've started adding the other symbols. See 5 Astraea. Adam Cuerden talk 23:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbol

message: Should it be mentioned that in the Fictional Universe of Mobile Suit Gundam 3 Juno was towed to the Earth Sphere, Renamed Luna II, mined out then moved to L3 to become am Earth Federation Space Force major stronghold?
68.9.223.94 13:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not here.  For that sort of information we have Asteroids in fiction. Michaelbusch 15:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional References? 

message: The Artist's conception of 3 Juno (:Image:3AS.jpg) is marked as GFDL, but it comes from a Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics press release, and there is no indication at the site that the image is available under the GFDL.  I've had a previous success getting the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics office of Public Affairs to release an image under a free license, so I've contacted them again and inquired about obtaining a free license to the images from this press release.  In the meantime I'm going to remove the image from the article. —RP88 22:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are doing this, could you also ask for the actual images of Juno to be released as well?  They are preferable to both an unresolved speck and any artist's concept. Michaelbusch 22:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes, I'll definitely be asking for permission to use the actual images in addition to the artist's concept.  I too would prefer to use an actual image in place of a drawing. However, while the artist's concept was created by the director of their Public Affairs office, the actual images were published in Baliunas (2003), so they may not be able to be as accommodating with them. —RP88 23:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck! I'm crossing all appendages. Deuar 17:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All appendages?! Lexicon (talk) 22:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist's conception of 3 Juno 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/lc.html
** In 100 Hekate on 2011-05-23 01:57:54, 404 Not Found
** In 16 Psyche on 2011-05-25 01:54:45, 404 Not Found
** In 100 Hekate on 2011-05-31 21:19:18, 404 Not Found
** In 16 Psyche on 2011-06-01 19:14:06, 404 Not Found
** In 2 Pallas on 2011-06-19 06:04:19, 404 Not Found
** In 3 Juno on 2011-06-19 07:14:09, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 07:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/taxonomy.html
** In Flora family on 2011-03-19 08:18:31, 404 Not Found
** In 102 Miriam on 2011-05-23 02:00:14, 404 Not Found
** In 161 Athor on 2011-05-25 01:51:46, 404 Not Found
** In 102 Miriam on 2011-05-31 21:44:56, 404 Not Found
** In 121 Hermione on 2011-06-01 03:38:14, 404 Not Found
** In 130 Elektra on 2011-06-01 14:38:25, 404 Not Found
** In 161 Athor on 2011-06-01 18:51:41, 404 Not Found
** In 24 Themis on 2011-06-19 05:36:27, 404 Not Found
** In 3 Juno on 2011-06-19 07:14:14, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 07:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/spin.html
** In 130 Elektra on 2011-05-23 02:45:17, 404 Not Found
** In 130 Elektra on 2011-06-01 14:38:06, 404 Not Found
** In 3 Juno on 2011-06-19 07:14:26, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 07:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: The article currently gives the mass of 3 Juno as 2.67  kg, but the citation supporting this mass since been updated with 2 new values:  2.31  kg (Fienga 2010) and 2.86  kg (Baer 2011).  Should the article reflect these later values?
Mynameisnoted (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would say the article should use the latest figures. -- Kheider (talk) 16:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass update 

message: When I see a pair of sentences such as: "An alternate but less likely explanation is an impact by a sizeable body."(around 1839) and "The images spanned a whole rotation period and revealed an irregular shape and a dark albedo feature, interpreted as a fresh impact site." I wonder about the wisdom of including random factoids from uncorrelated sources without either searching out a more recent discussion which resolves the apparent conflict one way or the other, (i.e. remove 'less likely' or 'but such an impact could not have produced the orbital deviation attributed to 1839'). In any case, i seriously doubt the orbital deviation caused by a non-collision interaction with another planetesimal body would appear to be 'sudden' unless that body were one of the larger objects with well understood paths.
:Do you have a better source? Ruslik_Zero 18:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh Impact or no fresh impact? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on 3 Juno. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.allaboutastro.com/Articlepages/whatcanisee.html
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://home.comcast.net/~kpheider/3Juno-ecc.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 3 Juno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/lc.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/albedo.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511115437/http://www.jas.org.jo/ast.html to http://www.jas.org.jo/ast.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 3 Juno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081031065523/http://iau-comm4.jpl.nasa.gov/EPM2004.pdf to http://iau-comm4.jpl.nasa.gov/EPM2004.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.asteroidoccultation.com/2013_07/0729_3_30531.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.asteroidoccultation.com/2013_07/0730_3_29995.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060627152558/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu:80/press/pr0318image.html to http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/pr0318image.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 3 Juno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mqof7MU9?url=http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/lc.html to http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/lc.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mqof7ROl?url=http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/albedo.html to http://www.psi.edu/pds/resource/albedo.html
*Added  tag to http://comets-asteroids.findthedata.org/l/3015/3-Juno
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208013152/http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/press/pr0318.html to http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/press/pr0318.html
*Added  tag to http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2003/2003_Baliunas_etal_1.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904083927/http://scully.cfa.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/returnprepeph.cgi?d=b2011&o=00003 to http://scully.cfa.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/returnprepeph.cgi?d=b2011&o=00003
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified