Talk:List of National Rugby League records

message: I like this page.  Just one small thing that kinda bothers me.  Rugby league is primarily a game of tries, not kicks for goal.  That's why it's so great, right?  So I think records like most career tries, or most tries in a season, etc are much more important/interesting/relevant, than most career points, most points in a season, etc (which invariably go to teams' goal-kickers).  You have to scroll down through the top point-scorers to get to the top try-scorers.  This is rugby league records, not rugby union records.  Was thinking maybe re-ordering/re-formatting the lists could be good?--Jeff79 03:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right you are. No doubt because in 1983 the number of points awarded for a try went up from three to four. This I think lends more weight to my argument that records in rugby league should be detailed in wikipedia primarily in terms of tries and secondarily in terms of points.--Jeff79 00:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah this page incorporates all competitions from 1908, including Super League, but is only according to stats from 1967 onwards in most cases (for individual points scorers from here). It is by no means complete, so feel free to add new sections into it. That said, leave points scorers even if it means moving them down below try scorers. --mdmanser 06:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By no means do I want to replace top point-scorers data with top try-scorers data. I think both should appear. But when it comes to making the choice of which should appear first, I think tries take precedence.--Jeff79 18:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most points 

message: Could a option be added to the table where it can sorted in a category you want? Say you want to know the teams listed with most wons you click on the wins heading and it sorts the teams by most wins?
Kind of like with the English Premier League all time table?Muzgrob 08:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to main table 

message: 18-0 down to win 32-24, with 32 points yeah agai st raiders  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.85.35 (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cowboys 1st august 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on List of NRL records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801203649/http://stats.rleague.com:80/rl/teams/all/overall_st.html to http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_st.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070821095436/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/rl_index.html to http://stats.rleague.com/rl/rl_index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on List of NRL records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_st.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070104064323/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_st.html to http://www.stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_st.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106133307/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html to http://www.stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106133307/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html to http://www.stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106133307/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html to http://www.stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106133307/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html to http://www.stats.rleague.com/rl/teams/all/overall_gr.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105231447/http://stats.rleague.com/rl/scorers/overall_sc1.html to http://www.stats.rleague.com/rl/scorers/overall_sc1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of National Rugby League records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080823153906/http://203.166.101.37/NRL08/comprecords.asp to http://203.166.101.37/NRL08/comprecords.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hey everyone, a few weeks ago I added the titles stripped from the storm due to their salary cap breaches to the tables at the top of the page, albeit strikethroughed and with a note explaining how the titles were removed. My reasoning at the time was to avoid confusion for people unaware of the titles being removed who might look at the premiership table and wonder why 2 years are missing.
The dates were just removed, but since it was by a brand new IP I figured I'd put them back in the meantime and make a topic here to see what consensus is like. Does everyone agree that showing the years strikethroughed is a good solution to avoid having unexplained missing years in the table? Another alternative would be to not have them in the table, but keep the total asterisked with the footnotes I added explaining the stripped titles. PhinsUp23 (talk) 12:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me Local Potentate (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melbourne's premiership and minor premiership entries 

message: Hey everyone, a few weeks ago I simplified "Gold Coast Giants/Seagulls/Chargers" to just Gold Coast Chargers in the match results tables, and to Gold Coast Seagulls in the wooden spoons table. Reasoning at the time was that it seems oddly inconsistent to shows 3 different names only for this team. I put Seagulls in the wooden spoons table since it was under that name that they "won" the spoons, and Chargers in the match results table as that was their most recent name.
The change was reverted last week, but since it was from an IP that hasn't been active for a year I figured I'd put the short names back in the meantime and make a topic here to see what everyone thinks. I don't see why the Chargers specifically would need three of their names in the table when we don't include alternate names like Eastern Suburbs for the Roosters or the Sydney Bulldogs. The Gold Coast Gladiators were also not in the original name, which is understandable since that name was only used very briefly, but then it becomes a case of where the line is drawn since the original Giants name was only used for 2 seasons.
On the same topic, should we rename the Western Reds in the table to the Perth Reds, since that was the name they went by in their last season (would be consistent with using Gold Coast Chargers), or would the most commonly known and used name be preferred? If the latter, you could also make a case that the old Gold Coast franchise should just go by Seagulls rather than Chargers, but I personally disagree with this option and think we should use the most recent names in the match results table, and then whichever name for the Gold Coast is preferred by everyone else for the wooden spoon table (most recent, or the one they used when they actually got the spoons). PhinsUp23 (talk) 07:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Suppose I should provide the rationale. For using all three names was when they were being referred to in a record as their collective history from 1988-98. Individual instances, say a biggest win or loss against a team, use their identity at the time of said match. They had 3 different mascots along with 3 different and distinct jerseys. 220.236.119.43 (talk) 13:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former team names 

message: @Talsta this one's mainly going out to you since you added the extra attendance records recently, but input from anyone else would also be nice. Day 2 of this year's magic round had a high enough attendance to make the Top 5 table, so I've replaced the last entry with it, but I can see why some might not agree with this.
While Magic Round is a special round, it's still in the regular season, and I figured that label was more directed at finals double headers. And while it was 3 games, not a strict double-header, I feel like that's more of a technicality.
Still, if nobody else agrees with the change, feel free to undo it. PhinsUp23 (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic Round attendances