Talk:Brad Bushman

message: I've declined speedy because the article says his research has been featured in Newsweek, on the CBS Evening News, on 20/20, and on National Public Radio, thus asserting notability. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 02:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if SatyrTN has unprodded, but I'm going to do it.  Brad Bushman passes WP:PROF even if this article doesnt (yet) make that clear. Pete.Hurd (talk) 15:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm being cautious because this (unsourced) article was created by an editor who has a bit of a history of creating iffy articles about psychology profs. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 15:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick googlenews search shows that in this case there is indeed substantial newscoverage, including the places mentioned in the article such as Newsweek, CBS News, NPR, etc. One just needs to expand the article and add references to it for verification, but plenty of sources covering this guy do exist. Nsk92 (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I could whack in a paragraph or two about his influence on thinking on aggressive behaviour, etc, but I'm overloaded in RL.  Meanwhile, let me just suggest that it's not worth an AfD (unless it is for AfD==cleanup purposes). Pete.Hurd (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy decline 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brad Bushman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091028044018/http://www.jennyzhang.net:80/research/ to http://jennyzhang.net/research/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There's been a recent retraction of Brad Bushman's controversial 2012 article "Boom, Headshot!?" from Communication Research. The article had concluded that playing first-person shooters with hand controllers (traditional joystick controllers, not aiming controllers) improved the players' aiming accuracy with real guns. The article was challenged by two doctors from other universities who discovered statistical irregularities which suggested the data had been skewed, and an OSU investigation committee learned that the original research records had already been destroyed. Bushman has since replicated the study, and the results are currently in review.
I don't think this is remotely a "scandal", since there's no proof of (or accusation of) professional misconduct. However, it seems notable enough to include, given that lawyers have previously used this article to make arguments about video games and safety. The only reason I know about this retraction is that we work at the same university and I discovered an early article in news media which described it. However, I don't think the article counts as an RS, and I'm not an expert editor so I avoid editing on BLP except for typos and wording.
Is this notable? If not, would it be notable if it spreads to RS in the near future? TricksterWolf (talk) 22:50, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retraction