Talk:Spider-Man 3

message: Why is there a plot summary in the lead section? --Codrdan (talk) 07:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've seen, typically there is a brief plot summary in the lead, similar to how the back of DVDs have a small plot summary. It gives you an idea of what the movie is about without getting into too much detail. I don't know if it's a WP:FILM standard to give a small plot summary in the lead of a film article. I suggest, if it concerns you, looking into it and, if it is and you have an issue with it, bringing it up over there. Anakinjmt (talk) 21:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section 

message: I was just wondering, why is this page locked?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.218.62.193 (talk) 18:31, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  quick question 

message: as they both reprise their roles from spider man 2 i think they should be added as minor characters, i know the girl is Mageina Tovah and she plays Ursula Ditkovich, but i dont know who plays her father, anyway they were both in spiderman 2 also.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.7.177 (talk) 05:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter's landlord and his daughter in cast and characters 

message: the picture of the movie is flipped. it should be regular spidey looking at black suited spidey in the window  — Preceding unsigned comment added by D joker27 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So the DVD got it wrong too then? Sean 21:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Epic Fail

message: * http://www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/spiderman3/titleSite.swf
* http://www.sonypictures.jp/movies/spiderman/images/flash/header_player.swf
* http://classic-web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.spiderman3-lefilm.com/push.swf was not successfully archived, so the French site is lost
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: To archive

message: I haven't had time to read all the article but I do have some concern regarding the cast section. The cast section used to have more information then it does now that was encyclopedic. Did they get moved on somewhere else on the article? Also that image of Harry Osborn doesn't seem to meet the requirements of fair use images. Jhenderson 777 15:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a revision example. I haven't checked all of the revisions but where did these useful commentary go? Jhenderson 777 15:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see what you meant at first, but you seem to have been talking about the longer paragraphs citing how Church, Grace and Howard got their roles and background on their work. Yeah, you're right — that sort of brief backgrounding is typical of at least WPC movie articles, such as Iron Man 2. Some of the stuff in the older version you link to really needs polishing and a little rewriting, though — some of it's a bit puffy and fan-magaziney, and that might have been the reason someone trimmed them way back. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast section concern 

message: "A reboot of the trilogy was released five years later."
Should be changed to: 
"A reboot of the franchise was released five years later."
Anyone looking up the definitions will agree. The specific trilogy was not re-created, nor is it being recreated. The FRANCHISE has been rebooted, bearing too many differences to be specifically re-doing the original trilogy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.95.107 (talk) 04:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trilogy vs. Franchise 

message: https://collider.com/spider-man-3-sam-raimi/
Majinsnake (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sam raimi on spiderman 3 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Give me rent. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 25#Give me rent until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Give me rent" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Give me your rent. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 3#Give me your rent until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 18:24, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Give me your rent" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :You'll get your rent when you fix this damn door! and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#You'll get your rent when you fix this damn door! until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 21:37, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "You'll get your rent when you fix this damn door!" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: At what part of this page do you guys think would be perfect for mentioning that there have been campaigns and petitions for a director’s cut of this movie to be made and released? And are there any sources to confirm it? Austin012599 (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Without the latter, the former is immaterial. DonIago (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I did this section. I put sources before it was remove. It could be put in "Legacy" section though. 178.51.238.177 (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources you provided are not reliable, as mentioned in the edit summaries left by editors when your edits were reverted. DonIago (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

text: The campaign itself doesn't seem to be notable either. It's not comparable to the #ReleasetheSnyderCut campaign at all. —El Millo (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release the RaimiCut