Template talk:WikiProject Politics

message: There is no automatic category for List-class politics articles, maybe this should be fixed... - Ilse@ 15:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List-class articles

message: There are a couple of bug reports in a template that transcludes this one, that look relevant. Template talk:WikiProject Political parties. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug reports 

message: moved from Template talk:WikiProject Political parties and followed up here
(The task force template) also fails for apparently correct importance=low. The categorization is correct, but the presentation omits the importance. See for example:  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was . You should ask , who made that edit, why they "don't care". --Redrose64 (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: No importance code for task force articles

message: Add Gun politics task force. Proposed version can be seen at Template:WikiProject_Politics/sandbox. –dlthewave ☎ 14:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: too much regression would result. Please base your changes on the current template, not one that is three years old. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've updated the sandbox version with the current template, could you take a look at it again? This is my first template edit so any guidance would be appreciate. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 01:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK,  Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 April 2018 

message: According to  by , four of the task forces are defunct, hence the associated parameters are deprecated. Is there a proposal anywhere to remove these parameters from the template proper? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I just made some changes to the template sandbox on this matter. It would seek to put the defunct task forces into the note section instead of side-by-side with the active ones. Would there be any objection to this change? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Task force deprecation 

message: There has been no objection to this change, so I'm going to assume that it's fine. Please, Copy and Paste code found at . Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: nvm. Let me make some changes. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 4 July 2019 

message: Please sync with Sandbox. I've re-ordered the task forces and added a new WikiProject which has merged with WP:POLITICS –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 15:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , is there any particular reason for the rearrange, or is it just a convenient side effect of adding the new task force? What is the new order, and how is it different from the old? Primefac (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I moved the inactive/defunct task forces to the bottom of the list (see above; this was easier than what I said I was going to do). –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Done Primefac (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 March 2020 

message: Add alias for  and  to support  and  –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 16:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 18 December 2020 

message: @WOSlinker: why did you undo your change to this template? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @MSGJ: _PAGETYPE_ didn't work in the inactive taskforces section of the template. -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true, it won't work with the hooks. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  21:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The template transclusion chain goes  ->  ->  ->  -> . Seems like the naming of :Category:Wikipedia substituted templates is somewhat vague and inconsistent with how it is actually populated (templates where a decision on to substitute or not to substitute has been made). It is however distinct from :Category:Wikipedia templates to be automatically substituted which is for templates that should be substituted and can be done so by a bot. Harryboyles 23:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this template in [[:Category:Wikipedia substituted templates]]?