lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Central Macedonia

message: These are useful to understand geopolitics and international perceptions, and the reasons and change of these perceptions through time. Perhaps a corresponding section should be created in these articles. 
I'll start with a quote.
«ἡ κυβέρνησις τῶν Η.Π.Α. θεωρεῖ, ὅτι συζήτησις περὶ «Μακεδονικοῦ ἔθνους, Μακεδονικῆς πατρίδος καὶ Μακεδονικῆς ἐθνικῆς συνειδήσεως» ἰσοῦται μὲ δημαγωγίαν, ποὺ δὲν ὑποκρύπτει ἐθνικὴν ἢ πολιτικὴν πραγματικότητα, ἀλλὰ ὑποκρύπτει ἐπεκτατικὰς διαθέσεις κατὰ τῆς Ἑλλάδος».
"The United States government holds, that any discussion of a Macedonian nation, Macedonian homeland, or Macedonian national identity, to be demagoguery, that does not hold ethnic or political reality, but expansionary attitudes towards Greece."
- Edward Stettinius, U.S. Secretary of State, December 26, 1944
http://www.sartzetakis.gr/points/makedonia16.html
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.43.91 (talk • contribs) 12:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Reactions 
Talk:Seneca Rocks

message: I'm going to start working on improving this article to be more concise with the history of Seneca Rocks, would be great if others pitched in helped as well! I created a To-Do box above, add things there if you think they need addressed as well! Raeky (talk) 03:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Successfully acquired a picture of the rocks from 1975 before the fall of the Gendarme. Tom Parsons from Ohio on Flickr was very gracious by uploading his picture for the article. Raeky (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Added some info and links to news articles on the old visitor center and new. Still need pictures.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raeky (talk • contribs) 02:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve this article 

message: The term "Cliffs of Seneca" likely hasn't been used in 100 years. I propose the first sentence shouldn't be "formerly known as Cliffs of Seneca." I presume this comes from the title of the drawing from the 1800's calling it "Cliffs of Seneca." The drawing is great historical info for the article, but because it was called that 100 years ago doesn't justify it being in the first sentence of the article. If anyone objects I'll eventually make this change in a few days (if anyone is even watching this page, lol.) Raeky (talk) 13:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree to remove the "Cliffs of Seneca" alternate name as well.  I've always seen it referred to as "Seneca Rocks."  For what it is worth, GNIS lists "Seneca Rocks" as being set as the official name for the cliff in 1967.  It doesn't even list "Cliffs of Seneca" as a known alternate name. Brian Powell (talk) 17:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Change made. Raeky (talk) 07:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cliffs of Seneca"
Talk:Mogol

message: For a long time this page was a redirect to Mughal Empire, but it actually doesn't seem that common a spelling of "Mughal"; of the four links to Mogol, three were for the lyricist, and the remaining one was on someone's talk page. Not a very big sample, to be sure, but still evidence that links/searches for "Mogol" are not going to be overwhelmingly intended to mean "Mughal". Google searches seem to turn up mostly people's names, though the first hit is for the lyricist. --Trovatore 01:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: reason for dab page
Talk:Politics of North Macedonia

message: Given ongoing discussions and recent edit warring, a poll is currently underway to decide the rendition of the lead for the Republic of Macedonia article.  Please weigh in! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 01:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Republic of Macedonia#POLL: Introduction for Republic of Macedonia article|POLL: Introduction for Republic of Macedonia article]] 

message: The sections 'Majority & proportionality' are outdated; they describe the system in use in 1998, while since 2002, parliament is wholly elected by list-PR (in 6 20-memeber districts) (+3 expatriate single-member-districts)--Bancki (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 'majority / Proportionality' outdated 

message: It is important to write the dates and the source of the informations. The cabinet is not "current". Meanwhile it has changed! The informations are outdated!!!--Stonepillar (talk) 08:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information 

message: In the #Current Cabinet section, two tables have columns entitled "Macedonio". The term is not referred to anywhere else that I can find, and I can't determine from context what it is supposed to mean. Please change/define/link as needed. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 03:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macedonio
Talk:Leah Price

message: see also Wikipedia:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies/Academics 
Googling: ( "leah price" novel ) results in >13K listings, which confirms the notion from sources that label price as a rising star, and the book as a central and very important piece of work in the field Santaduck 01:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Category talk:Anglicanism

message: In the article on this organisation Henry Scott Holland is described as 'Dean of St Paul's', when he was in fact a Canon of St Paul's.  That he never became Dean is clear from the list, elsewhere on Wikipedia, of Deans of St Paul's.
86.183.234.247 (talk) 19:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Social Union (UK)
Talk:Flik

message: I can't tell offhand whether this is actually a commonly-used unit, just a neologism, or a hoax, but I cleaned it up just in case. I changed "steradians squared" to "steradians", assuming that this is for spectral radiance (radiance per unit wavelength). Ardric47 01:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good! That would also explain why I can't find any Google results. Ardric47 02:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments before first article merger with [[Flick (physics)]]
Talk:Manikato

message: This article has Manikato accredited with 21 Group 1 wins "by todays standards".
However Manikato is usually attributed with 11 Group 1 wins.
1978 Blue Diamond Stakes
1978 Golden Slipper Stakes
1978 Caulfield Guineas
1978 Invitation Stakes
1979 Futurity Stakes
1979 Doncaster Handicap
1979 Rothmans 100,000 (Doomben 10,000)
1980 Futurity Stakes
1980 George Ryder Stakes
1981 Futurity Stakes
1983 Futurity Stakes
The William Reid Stakes / Australia Stakes that Manikato won 5 times (1979 - 1983) was not given Group 1 status until 1987 and is listed in the Austrlian Stud Book as Group 2 in 4 of Manikato's wins 1980 to 1983 inclusive.
The C F Orr Stakes that Manikato won 3 times (1979 - 1981) was not given Group 1 status until 1993 and is listed in the Austrlian Stud Book as Group 2 in 1980 onwards.
The Freeway Stakes (later Manikato Stakes that Manikato won twice ( times (1979, 1982) was not given Group 1 status until 1989 and is listed in the Austrlian Stud Book as a Group 2 in both Manikatos wins.
Page has been adjusted. (dark horse 01:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of G1 wins
Talk:Jack Schaefer

message: I moved the page to Jack Warner Schaefer becuase i belive everyone should be addressed with full names in Encyclopedias. samphex 18:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However this isnt wikipedia policy, but thanks for helping Victuallers (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: moved to wrong page
Talk:Cai Zhong

message: WP:V Is this history, or fiction?  It's clearly from the famous Romance of the Three Kingdoms, but that's a historical novel, not a history. See  chapter 47.  Thanks. --John Nagle 02:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

message: :Romance of the Three Kingdoms is based on an actual period of Chinese history. As far as I know, the individuals in the book are all historical. — BrianSmithson 17:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Being based on Chinese history is not the same as being history.  The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a novel that is largely fictional in nature, and its contents should not be taken as historical.  See also Sanguo Zhi.  --Nlu (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't say they should. I said the characters in the novel were based on real people, which is true as far as I know. — BrianSmithson 01:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manuel Antonio Chaves

message: :Civil War history, Lt. Col., apparently first cousin of José Francisco Chaves (Simmons, The Little Lion of the Southwest)
Note context & data for JFC via What-links-here, including comment inside markup of List of people by name: Chas-Chaz#Chaves as sole surname--Jerzy•t 02:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wrong about "first cousin"—they were distantly related.  —JerryFriedman 16:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Lakewood High School (Florida)

message: There are people who've made lasting contributions to LHS. Do they deserve mention? 
* Sherman Jones introduced the CC Stomp 
* Principal Duda introduced the "Best School in the Universe" nickname
* Taylor Hoffman introduced the Gay Straight Alliance
* Mr. Mark Granning introduced CATCOM
There are more. But these are the ones I know of. Dragix 13:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributors

message: I added a userbox to the article, though two of the fields are unknown to me, the established date and the name of the school paper. Can anyone fill those in? Jgamekeeper 02:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no school paper. Dragix 23:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  "My bad". Yes there is. Dragix 02:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: Can anyone support the claims made by 66.115.102.14? From what their contributions show, they're a vandal, so I have doubts. Jgamekeeper 01:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy and Rumors

message: Just removed the "excluding varsity football" part of the sentence "Lakewood High has shown exceptional skill in all areas of sports", as I remember them being the #1 ranked football team for at least one year while I was there (1997 maybe).  This section could probably be fleshed out with championships, rather than just focusing on the band.
Haplar 23:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extracurricular Activities 

message: This program was started in the mid 90's, not the early 21st century.  I made the change to reflect this.Haplar 23:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: CATCOM started later than CAT. --Lakerdonald 00:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My first year in CATCOM was 1994 (my sophomore year), and it had already been around for at least 1 or 2 years.Haplar 03:47, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't necessarily mean that CATCOM didn't start later. I knew that early 21st was wrong though, I just have no idea when exactly it started. --Lakerdonald 18:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Where exactly did you merge it? You should merge it with the Center for Advanced Technologies article, if anything. Dragix 01:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CATCOM
Talk:Skinner (profession)

message: *I believe everything in Skinner (profession) is perfectly true, but in fact looks like a transcript of modem communication and some parts look a bit odd, LOL. If anyone has more insight into the meat production and/or butchering, please review it. Some osmosis with butcher in general would also be welcomed. Oneliner 21:46, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spiel mit mir

message: I changed "incest between a brother and sister" to "incest between two brothers" as it seems to indicate that by the lyrics. I also added another verse and translation to show the part that indicates that the incest is most likely between two males. Kytok 02:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the lyrics. The meaning of the song is not vague at all in the lyrics, so there really isn't any specific analysis needed. Nearly all of the song was posted anyways. ~MDD4696 02:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

text: The lyrics don't indicate in any way that it is between two brothers - only that one person is a brother. The song is in "first person" but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is from the perspective of a male, simply because the artist who performs it is male. 216.36.186.2 (talk) 18:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Hergest Ridge (album)

message: Apparently the orchestral version was never released, but I have a very "official" looking cassette version of this. I must have a look at the receipt (if it's still inside) and see where I picked it up.
The vinyl Boxed version was indeed quadraphonic but the CD Boxed version was in stereo which included Hergest Ridge. The information in the listing is therefore wrong in saying that all subsequent Hergest Ridge albums were in quadraphonic.Peter Jensen (talk) 12:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh. There ain't no such thing as a quadrophonic CD, since quadrophonic sound is not contemplated in the "Red Book".
To the best of my knowledge, it seems there have been several versions of this recording, both on CD and LP, that used different mixes and sounded quite different from the original issue. No subtle tweaks, the mixes were drastically different. Note that I'm not talking about the 2010 re-issue here (haven't heard that one yet) but issues from the late 70's - early 80's onwards. I ran into this when I wanted to replace my original vinyl copy which much to my regret was damaged beyond recovery. No luck: each and every copy I got my hands on was different from the original as I remembered it - to the point that I came to believe my memory of the original must've been way off. It was only after a few decades that I managed to locate a vinyl rip of the original issue which proved I hadn't been hallucinating for 20 years.
Anyone in the know care to shed some light on this?
Rocknrollsuicide (talk) 03:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Joseph Albright (journalist)

message: According to this article Joseph Albright is only notable as the former husband of Madeleine Albright, therefore, I propose that the two pages be merged. --TommyBoy 02:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: As result of the discussion on this Talk page and on Talk:Madeleine Albright, I have swapped the merger tag on this article for an expansion tag. --TommyBoy 16:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal Dropped

message: Still not have found much about his career. Also odd, he took the name "Albright", but is listed as born in 1935 while his mother married Ivan Albright in 1946? So think maybe he was step-father. His mother's first husband was Jay frederick Reeve in 1936. So he might have been illegitimate, but need to be careful of course with a living (?) person. W Nowicki (talk) 00:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More needed
Talk:Glossematics

message: Erased link to glossematica.net, which has been taken over by filthy domainsquatters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.230.7 (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

message: I would like to try and add this article to the Featured Articles link. Since it is not my article, I figure I should somehow run it by the authors. I hope to get word soon! polly 02:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Knock yourself out, I just grabbed it from the stack at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles. Eldereft 17:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Glossematics as Featured Article?'''
Talk:Noise regulation

message: Theres that ear again! Do we really need to show a picture of someones ear?--Light current 02:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of ear 

message: Why?--Light current 00:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Capitol building 

message: This article is fundamentally flawed. The UK passed the Noise Abatement Act in 1960. See the Noise Abatement Society' webpage for more details.
:i think the operative words here are enactment of broad based, enforceable legislation. the early action of the UK is laudable and now in the article intro, but the UK and Japanese actions fall far short of comprehensive attack on environmental noise.  the UK laws did not have a basis for strict numerical limits on products and vehicles, nor the stiff fines for non compliance, nor comprehenive directives to local government which would lead to "teeth" in local building and planning standards. today the UK is progressing well but still not operating at the level of designing buildings for example as the U.S. does in local planning oversight.  you are welcome to expand the international section, but it is important to be specific regarding what type of noise control each country actually has. i welcome your further involvement. please sign your posts in the future. cheers Covalent 23:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First country to bring in legal controls? 

message: Has trhis hotel been soundproofed? If not, what's it doing here? I will remove it if no satisfactory answers in 2 weeks--Light current 22:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel picture 

message: I believe this article needs a pretty comprehensive rewrite. It seems to violate NPOV and especially fairness of tone: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Npov#Fairness_of_tone
The entire article takes the stance that noise regulation is a positive and that any slowness in it being implemented is "unfortunate". If I knew a bit more on the subject I would try to do rewrite myself but if someone more knowledgable than me could have a go at it that'd be nice. --BHC 19:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite need
Talk:Western meadowlark

message: I don't know anything about this bird - I'm helping my daughter with a school project.  But one sentence says that eastern and wester meadowlarks interbreed, and one says that they don't.  Please - somebody who knows something about the bird, please make a correction and delete the incorrect sentence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.42.221 (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interbreeding

message: Are these birds carnivore/carrion eaters ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex d. chapman,jr. (talk • contribs) 21:59, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diet 

message: Why does the Oregon section (from the {Oregon} term) appear at the bottom of this article?  I know that the Meadowlark is the state bird of Oregon but that shouldn't mean that we need to list all that information about Oregon in this article.  I see that the {Oregon} term appears in some other articles that describe things that happen to be symbols of Oregon e.g. Coast Douglas-fir but it does not appear in others e.g. Chinook salmon.  —Preceding Spkal (talk) 04:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon Section 

message: Someone erased the useful information.  Please replace.  :-(  
98.155.48.10 (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't ping you because you're an IP address, but thank you for noticing this! I've undone the vandalism and warned the account which did this. Umimmak (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description for Western Meadowlark please edit
Talk:Road hierarchy

message: We might consider changing the title of this article to "Classification of roads" or "Road classifications", those being much more common expressions—and more likely search terms for an encyclopedia entry—than "hierarchy of roads". Eric talk 03:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: There's no such thing as a "freeway" in Canada. We use the term "Highway" or "autoroute" for top-level roads. — Muckapedia (talk) 30e nov. 2015 12h24 (−4h) 16:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Freeways"

message: I have added a lot of content that needs citations, but all of the information is already obtainable from other articles, so at this point we just need to add citations for them, but I can't do that at the moment. More importantly, though, I don't understand how to transclude just the specifications section of the article on collector roads, please help. Right now this page contains the directly copied-and-pasted source code for that section taken from the source page. I'm new to this. LegendoftheGoldenAges85, Team  M  (talk | worse talk) 09:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  General section
Talk:Carter Caves State Resort Park

message: Since KY has designated the Cascade area of the park as specially protected, it would be appropriate to remove this particular section:
All Money Making Caves are gated but one part of Cascade Cave -that is 2 miles (3.2 km) outside the park boundary - has also 2 large ungated openings. Access to one of them is easy: Behind the old cashier house starts a loop-trail in the box canyon. After a few meters there is a small trail to the left.
Endangered plants may be disturbed by going off trail. In addition, Cascade is a major money maker for the park, which is currently short on funds. Laurel and Horn Hollow are free self-guided tours; why cheat the park of the couple dollars to tour Cascade?
136.227.2.97 (talk) 03:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mole map

message: This sort of strikes me as more of an overly long disambiguation page.  I don't know how everyone else feels...CharacterZero 03:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have moved content into Mole map (Chemistry) and Mole map (Dermatology). --BlueNovember (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Morongo Casino, Resort & Spa

message: Worded like advertisment/biased
Utilizes marketing lines to boast location over neighbors.
I concur. The casino is notable, as there has been some news surrounding it (don't have those to hand right now) and the casino's operators, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, have been active politically in the state (including a VERY high-profile battle over expansion of gambling in the '90s that led to, IIRC, dueling ballot initiatives), but this sounds too much like a brochure to let stand. I'll tag it now, and when I have the time and energy, see what I can do to salvage it. Pat Payne 14:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worded like advertisment/biased 
Talk:Telecommunications in Yemen

message: I think the mobile cellular number is almost certainly out of date now - cell phones are quite common in Yemen now.  TastyCakes 03:18, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mobile
Talk:Return from the Stars

message: Why did you people call this book utopia? It is so much distopian and quite much related to the brave new world by aldus huxley.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.217.139 (talk) 01:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: utopia or distopia?

message: "They are alienated, outcasts, and subject to social pressure to undertake the betrization procedure".
This statement is false. They are subject to social pressure, but it is not considered to betrizize them ever. 
Here the specific quote from Dr. Juffon:
"The law makes an exception in your case (... that everyone should be betrizized), because the betrization of adults can affect the health and even be dangerous."
Sternen-Fisch (talk) 12:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: social pressure to undertake the betrization procedure
Talk:Australian Mathematics Competition

message: Shouldn't it be Australaisian Math Cometition? It's been like that on the test papers since like 2003 or something. --antilived T | C 05:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was "Mathematics" when I took it... in 1998. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 07:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Australasian is what us Kiwis call it...  I got a Distinction and now suck and hate maths.  oh well.  --Midnighttonight 08:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: :Although there is no publicly declared formula for the selection of students, it is possible that the results of the Australian Mathematics Competition are used in identifying students for further training by the Australian Mathematics Olympiad Committee.
Based on my own experiences, I think this is the case. Repeated high placings may be particularly important, as well as results from other mathematics competitions such as the University of Melbourne mathematics competition. --<SPAN STYLE="font-family:monospace; color:#008800; background-color:#ffffcc; border:1px solid #ff4444;"> B.D.Mills </SPAN> (T, C) 05:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMC for AMOC 