lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Picard group

message: I'm staring at an alternate definition of the Picard group as PSL(2,Z[i]), with Z[i] the gaussian integers.  I can't tell at all if this is somehow related to the Picard group defined in this article.  Any clue?   Problem I'm dealing with is a link I just added from Fuchsian group to here. linas 01:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate definition/Disambiguation

message: The remark about the Picard group of the affine line with double point has been there since the beginning of the page (2005). Can anyone verify this? I assume you have to use some lemma on the effect of removing a point on cohomology...or perhaps there's a reference? Expz (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picard group of non-separated scheme

message: I'm adding a dated jargon tag because, as someone who has an associate's level understanding of math and hobbyist understanding of astronomical and relativistic concepts, I can't make head or tail of what's in this article.
From Wikipedia:Manual of Style: "Avoid introducing too many new words for the purpose of "teaching the reader some new words" that are specialized to a field, when more common alternatives will do. Also, wikilinking as a mechanism for explanation (rather than a parenthetical in the article) is poor form, especially if done repeatedly." Naptastic (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy Jargon, Batman!
Talk:Losi (mythology)

message: I moved this page to make room for a disambiguation page, which references this article, and I listed it as a stub, since its well...stubby. --Phroziac 01:13, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Team Losi -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Losi"
Talk:Timeline of United States military operations

message: How much do we include in this article? I am not sure. In this article, the year 2019 has one sentence. Yet the IUUFASA lists over a dozen. And I recall hearing that US troops are deployed in approximately 150 countries. So, what is the logic for what goes in this article?
RayKiddy (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Include What?

message: "1995 – Bosnia. Operation Deliberate Force. NATO bombing of Bosnian Serbs."
\"NATO bombing of Bosnian Serbs\" --- please someone remove subjective description of the intervention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.201.142 (talk) 04:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation deliberate force 

message: This article, and it's three twins, is continously quoted on the internet as a list of US aggression and invasions. Not only is it's content blatantly POV, but it's also used as ammunition in the left's revisionistic continued Cold War against democracies. It doesn't deserve inclusion on Wikipedia anymore than xenophobic raves about muslim immigrants raping western women.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.82.213.198 (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide specific examples of allegedly biased content in this article, and specify which other articles you refer to?TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 14:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold war article 

message: Recently, all dates for everything in this list were made bold by this edit.  I don't think it helps much, and the lede states that wars in bold are important, which now do not stand out in the list.  If there are no objections, I will unbold the dates.  --A D Monroe III (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually think that the bolding of dates is a good idea, it helps the reader in a way that you might not think of to distinguish one line from another. -SantiLak (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we figure some alternative way to help distinguish the lines without using bold for multiple conflicting purposes?  --A D Monroe III (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold dates?
Talk:Chemise

message: Shift also refers, in common usage, to a simple dress worn as outerwear. This meaning should be covered in this article. Here is the definition as it appears in the Random House dictionary as cited on dictionary.com: "Clothing. a. a straight, loose-fitting dress worn with or without a belt." (See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/shift)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.17.158 (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of dresses?

message: I have seen sources that suggest the heavy linen smock-frock evolved from the chemise, but I suspect the medieval frock (an outer garment) is a more likely source.  Do we have any scholarly research to back this up one way or the other?  PKM 01:14, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: --PKM 02:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of smock-frock?

message: The article currently states:
:Chemise is a French term (which today simply means shirt). This is a cognate of the Italian word camicia, and the Spanish / Portuguese word camisa (subsequently borrowed by Hindi / Urdu), all deriving ultimately from the Arabic qamĩṣ. 
But I find the idea of an Arabic origin suspect, given that the word already shows up in Late (but still firmly ancient) Latin as camisia.  --Iustinus .
:The OED agrees with you and doesn't mention Arabic at all.  I've corrected the etymology accordingly. Vashti 21:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Hello! I have made some additions of historical information to the article, charting the changes and developments of the chemise in western dress as an under (and outer!) garment over time. Hope this aids contributions to WikiProject Fashion and WikiProject Women's History. 
Thank you!  Diary of a Dress Historian (talk) 16:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of historical content to article
Talk:Sydir Kovpak

message: Quite a difficult topic to discuss, although Kovpak was Ukranian and most of his actions took place in Ukraine, by Wikipedia's default, most of the history WWII on the eastern front is given using Russian transliteration (e.g. battle of Kharkov, storming of the Dniepr, defence of Odessa...). I think there is a case for moving the article to Sidor Artemovich Kovpak. 
Kuban kazak 14:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest to leave it as is. Kovpak is not such a household name even among the WW2 fans. Also, he had an active post-War career in Soviet Ukraine. A clearly Ukrainian person in every possible way. Let's keep the Ukrainian name. --Irpen 15:30, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He lived not only during WWII. He was born into a Ukrainian family, he lived most of his life in Ukraine. What is the reason to change his name?--AndriyK 15:51, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: He was a SOVIET General and a Hero of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Army used Russian and the names of non-Russian Soviet commanders generally go into history as they were written in Russian. Furthermore, this man was a communist and more than likely *saw* himself as Soviet first, and then Ukrainian. Aadieu (talk) 01:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name transliteration, Ukranian or Russian?

message: This is and obvious geographical nonsense, because Chapayev never fought against Denikin.--Paul Siebert (talk) 06:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...as well as against Denikin's White Army in a legendary Vasily Chapayev's cavalry division. 
Talk:Alfa Romeo 159

message: It would be better to have a photo of the profile of the Sportwagon instead of the current photo, because now the differences between Sportwagon and berlina are not very clear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.81.28.30 (talk) 07:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: I notice the "159 in film" section in the article. I know this isn't a forum, but I was wondering why a 159 was used in the first place? It's certainly not as fast as an Aston DBS, and all the other cars in the film were provided by Ford. Why choose what is essentially an executive saloon? Is Fiat/Alfa Romeo going to be sponsoring the next Bond film? Bob talk 23:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was advert for US market introduction , better choice would have been of course the 8C model..when comparared to Aston --Typ932 T·C 08:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid question 

message: se the earliest vin number 
http://www.bozhdynsky.com/alfa-147-156-166-gt-production-dates/ YBSOne (talk) 11:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production started in 2004 
Talk:Hiram Abiff

message: Not disputing the accuracy of this... but it is really worth mentioning?  It strikes me as a bit of Masonic Trivia that readers would not need to know.  Blueboar (talk) 01:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chair of Hiram Abiff" 

message: I tweaked... Hiram Abiff (also Hiram Abif or the Widow's son) is the central character of an important story presented to all candidates during the third degree in Freemasonry. 
Hiram is presented as the chief architect of King Solomon's Temple. He is murdered inside this Temple by three ruffians, after they failed to obtain from him the Master Masons' secret passwords. The themes of the story are the importance of fidelity and the certainty of karma after death. 2601:589:4801:5660:EC71:24D9:9C8A:2D4C (talk) 06:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted. Karma isn’t mentioned in the majority of masonic jurisdictions, and we want to generalize so as to keep this applicable to all of them. Blueboar (talk) 11:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masonic Belief in Immortality of the Soul and Karma 

message: Albert Mackey has an explanation for the origin of Hiram Abiff. Is there any particular reason why it has not been included?--Berig (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Albert Mackey

message: According to Jewish commentator Metzudat David, the expression 'avi' relates to the fact the Hiram was also Hiram's father's artist. 2A01:73C0:601:5BFF:0:0:A2F5:38B6 (talk) 13:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiram Avi
Talk:Nicolás Massú

message: Some proof is needed for this fact please.--Nitsansh 03:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why?  Did you try googling it (faster than asking for proof)?  It is pretty clear.  --Epeefleche 03:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he Jewish? 

message: I invite the anonymous (and any other) editor who says that Massú's father is Palestinian to provide sources. Epeefleche has cited credible sources that say he's Lebanese. Of course, he could be a Palestinian Lebanese, but in any case, it must be sourced. SamEV 12:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is his father Lebanese or Palestinian?

message: For a perfect compromise :) ☆ CieloEstrellado 21:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome. SamEV (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you, SamEV

message: A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here.  Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page.  After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions.  Thank you.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion concerning this article

message: The introduction states that Massú "is the first and only player to have won both gold medals (singles and doubles) in the same Olympic Games". This is not true. Vincent Richards did this already at the 1924 Summer Olympics. See Tennis_at_the_1924_Summer_Olympics. 217.136.154.213 (talk) 22:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. It's fixed. SamEV (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double gold at the Olympics 

message: There is no mention of his Madrid Masters final in his career finals section, it's just not on there. Someone should remedy this as I don't know what date the final took place.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.161.228 (talk) 11:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madrid Masters 
Talk:No. 14 Squadron RNZAF

message: Hi, saw this page edited to a breif statement about the loss of the MB339s and so expanded, probably a bit clumsily, this is the first time I've tried writing for Wikipedia and so it's the victim of my learning curve).  have just noticed the past history pages, and see there was once upon a time a quite good post war history, which disappeared to be replaced with the breif version.  Any idea what happened?  Also, no idea what the Cleanup thing is on about - no doubt my bad spelling and grammar, but anyone who does know how it works, feel free to either just fix the article, or email me on the adress provided - cheers Kit Boyes, kitboyes@gmail.com.
er, thanks, left email address so you could contact me if making changes, not intending to sign the work.  Good job on the changes though.
:Hi. I was just performing some wikification, adding links to other articles, etc. It's tough to find all the right names of the aircraft, since they were called different things in different theaters of operation. I'll see if I can locate some other of the airplane names later. (We don't seem to have an article on the Gloster Grebe). func(talk) 01:43, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it correct that they planned to re-equip with Mk XIVs? If so, where from? There is a memo in the National Archives of Australia (A816 58/301/144, Spitfire Squadrons, SWPA Disposal of) dated 14 December 1945 from the British High Commissioner in Canberra to the Prime Minister of Australia suggesting they would re-equip with Mk VIIIs:
 
203.7.140.3 (talk) 05:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans to re-equip with Spitfire Mk XIVs
Talk:Public Security Section 9

message: It says on this page that Section 9 wasn't formed until the year 2029, but I've seen episodes where they are involved in the Laughing Man case. The Laughing Man case (according to the site) occured in 2024, five years before Public Security Section 9 was established. What the H is going on?
*Did you even watch the show? They make it pretty clear what's going on. The Laughing man case occured in 2024, never solved, then years later S9 is formed. Then, wait for it... the Laughing man (or, get this, imitators which may be imitating no actual original, ie a stand alone complex) returns and S9 investigates. It's not that difficult. Uxviii 06:00, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2029

message: What about the "Red Coats"?  They seem to be the mechanics of the group and are used quite often.  Aren't they part of Section 9?  70.237.51.139 22:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Coats

message: Against
- Section 9 is significant in most of the incarnations from the OVAs to the TV series and video games. Ominae (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging article

message: Reference 2 might be link rot at the time of my post here. I clicked on the URL earlier and it didn't even load, so I found the right link on the Wayback Machine ( https://web.archive.org/web/20211016155406/http://www.midnightanimation.com/gallery/ghost/gallery/section9.html ). Then, it took a long time for me to remember my Wikipedia account I made a long time ago (!!! I DID IT THOUGH). Then, I tried to figure out what I am supposed to do next and I checked the link again to be sure and now the server is responding at least but it gives a "File not found" error instead. So, I don't know what to do so I am just notifying you editors. BedPillowsandAll (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 2, midnightanimation.com, the website seems to be going down
Talk:Texas Assessment of Academic Skills

message: According to this Texas Government PDF file (don't worry Google/HTML it) Timeline of Testing in TEXAS, the exit level for the writing and math test changed from 11th grade to 10th occured in 1992-1994. --Chill Pill Bill 02:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wait, it was the 11th grade (final exam) however
Talk:Haida manga

message: is anyone other than nicoll yahgulanas produicng haida manga? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.141.124 (talk • contribs) 
:A good question. Would it not be best to merge this to a section in Michael Nicoll Yahgulanaas, which is thin and could be bulked up. This article also fails to assert notability which could leave it open to deletion, despite it looking like an interesting topic. (Emperor (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone else?

message: I'm removing the proposed deletion since there was no attempt to actually try to improve the article, it was just proposed for deletion based on the lack of references therein. Although true Michael Nicoll Yahgulanaas may be the only self-proclaimed Haida Manga artist, if this art movement is deemed unworthy of its own article, then a merger would be more appropriate. - Io Katai (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing PROD 
Talk:Voluntarism (philosophy)

message: I am moving the opening paragraph, as it was prior to my edits today, here to the Talk Page.  The first part of the sentence I have basically reworded in the article.  The content of the second half of the sentence can be added back in, where appropriate in the article, if we can determine the meaning intended by the editor, in more plain English.
Voluntarism is the school of thought, which regards the will to the difference of the intellectualism (as contrast) and emotionalism as basic facts of the realization (i.e. as epistemological voluntarism) or as a nature, cause of the world-whole (metaphysical voluntarism of Arthur Schopenhauer) and attributes a thinking and feeling to the will (psychological voluntarism is desire against ones will, example: I would do anything for that apple)
--Lini 11:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph from article moved here 

message: Because there are both epistemological and metaphysical examples and people will get confused thinking epistemology is a subset of metaphysics which it wasn't last time I looked :-)
Carol Moore 01:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this proposal. Let's start a former RM. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose rename this Voluntarism (Philosophy)

message: Regarding this:
:This putting out of the drive-detention-vital dynamics has influenced Friedrich Nietzsche (as will to power), Eduard von Hartmann, Sigmund Freud and the philosophy of life.
...Huh? Can we rephrase it in comprehensible English?65.213.77.129 (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Incoherence

message: I wish someone with a good foundation in philosophy could expand this article. It just seems like an introduction without a real body explaining what Voluntarism is, comparing it to other philosophical systems, how other philosophers have understood the concept, etc. It seems like a first draft of what could be a substantial piece with more information added to it.69.125.134.86 (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And also objections to this dangerous and influential philosophy.85.76.66.162 (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding Article 

message: ? Moorepatricia986 (talk) 00:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: ??. Editor2020 (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???????????
Talk:Conrad Haas

message: Just started.  "Buchsenmeister"?  "Zeugwart"? The Rod 22:23, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  German -> English 

message: How can you possible know that Conrad Haas was the first person to write about anything in his book.  Obviously rocketry had not "just been invented". All you know is that it is one document on a subject on which little documentation survives. The book is an historical treasure, but don't draw unwarranted conclusions.Magneticlifeform (talk) 05:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unwarranted conclusions
Talk:Malcolm Fraser

message: There is an ongoing discussion here which has turned to concern Malcolm Fraser, specifically how to describe his (or at least the beginning of his) and other Prime Minister's premierships and how to number them. It would be very much appreciated if any interested editors could join in and voice their thoughts on the matter! Thanks! FollowTheTortoise (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology and numbering 

message: User:Skyring you are the one who reverted my edits. What are your thoughts on my proposed changes? Ak-eater06 (talk)  23:47, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. We've had too much malarky recently over images. I went back to a good version. 2. The section is headed: "Prime Minister (1975–1983)", immediately following a section on how he got the job. We don't need the introduction to his PM section given a heading. 3. Unless you have a pretty good idea of how his government went, I'm not sure that arbitrary divisions are the way to go. Do they really call out the important moments in his term? How much research have you done on this bloke? There's a lot of us lived through that period and have had the advantage of reading forty years of analysis.--Pete (talk) 01:51, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I have no objections to these headings - but only if the paragraphs within each of these headings are greatly expanded, and properly cited of course. Thescrubbythug (talk) 05:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you prepared to expand these paragraphs with greater details, and to properly cite them & include any missing citations ? Thescrubbythug (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I've no objections to the proposed sub-headings. GoodDay (talk) 21:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Want to add headings for the section Prime Minister (1975-1983)
Talk:DePuy Synthes

message: The proper pronunciation of "DePuy" is "d-pwee," not "d-pue," as the article suggests. The name hails from Le Puy, in south central France, where Puy de Dome can be found. The original De Puys that came to North America - the New World - in the 1600s, included Moses De Puy and his seven sons. They sailed into what is now known as the Hudson River Valley and settled there. De Puy settlements then expanded across what is now New York state and upper Pennsylvania. 
Senator Chauncey Mitchell Depew of New York (from 1899-1911) was a De Puy.
Due to poor communications, translations, and education, which were typical of the day, the name evolved from the correct "d-pwee" pronunciation to the incorrect "d-pue" and stayed that way until after WWI. The spelling soon followed the erroneous pronunciation and became "Depew." As the pronunciation was corrected in the 20th century, so was the spelling.
Proper spelling is "De Puy," which uses a space. Today, some De Puys use the historical French spelling "de Puy."
The DePuy Company may pronounce their name as "d-pue," but they are incorrect. 
Pjdepuy (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DePuy pronunciation 

message: This article should merge with Synthes to reflect the 2012 acquisition and re-branding of the conapnies  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.177.129.211 (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge With Synthes 

message: * News message „Tagesschau“ (german)
* Information with Video (german) --Anka Friedrich (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Television: Profit mit mangelhaften Hüftimplantaten (Profit with defective hip implants)