lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caligula's Giant Ship

message: I changed the ship displacement from 7400 to 1300. I admit the source puts it at 7400 tons, but others put it at 1300 tons. A ship of 7400 tons, even for the size of Caligula, would be way too much for a wooden ship. It might be possible if Caligula's ship was a steamboat made of steel, but by looking at the archeological remains it's all wood so far. [Gnip|Gnip] January 2, 2007 10:59PM
::And someone changed it back. I'll try to find something more definitive.Doug Weller (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ship displacement

message: Is this really associated to Caligula? this looks exactly the same as the Syracusia ship from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syracusia#/media/File:The_Syracusia.png   (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syracusia)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:1650:C10:A066:CB28:ADBE:AD9B (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image associated to Caligula's ship also appears in the Syracusia ship article 

message: The image/design of the boat used for this artcile is the same as the one for "The Syracusia"
( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syracusia )
the boat design cant be the same for both articles surely, i wonder which one is the "correct" image... Jepst (talk) 11:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image/design of the boat used for this artcile is the same as the one for "The Syracusia"
Talk:National symbols of Pakistan/Archive 1

message: *"National amphibian" (National frog???)
*"National reptile"
*"National river"
*"National mountain"
*"National marine mammal"
*"Natioinal vegetable"
*"National document"
*"National Song (Patriotic)"
Some of these sound like an obvious hoax, often quite ridiculously so. So, I'd request citations for them. Please. Thanks. --Ragib 00:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions:

message: This page is candidate for quick deletion.
Siddiqui 03:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Paul Dobransky

message: This article was an extreme and unsubtle instance of using wikipedia to host an ad for the subject of the article! I've deleted most of the un-sourced laudatory  claims that were there - ie most of the "article". Umptious (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Aren't these biography articles supposed to give the date of birth? Don't see that here. --109.189.99.163 (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to add it with a reliable source. If it was not added, it is most likely because no source could be found. --Muhandes (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born 

message: It seems his own websites are no longer there. That means that some of the links in this section should maybe be changed or deleted.
But this also makes me wonder if Dobransky is deliberately reducing what he's offering to customers or the public or such now? --62.16.186.44 (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Payload fairing

message: As of the date signed below, I noticed the untitled link at reference [1] appears to be dead (http://module.smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/1853/6262/1/AIAA-2002-5854.pdf). DKEdwards (talk) 05:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monitor for cleanup: 

message: Is spacex the only company trying to reuse fairings?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.78.219.83 (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reuse 

message: Given SpaceX has been attempting several fairing recoveries recently in an attempt to reduce cost, should a new section dedicated to fairing reuse be added? XYZtSpace (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section on fairing recovery 

message: Does anyone have a good reference for how the air that is in the fairing get out as the rocket leaves the atmosphere? Gpetrov (talk) 12:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does air get out
Talk:Toxic Waste (candy)

message: "sold in the United States", they're also on sale in the UK and other parts of europe..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TigerTails (talk • contribs) 11:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Retailed in..

message: ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional sources

message: As well as the original and red drums, in the UK we also have green and purple. Green contains Melon, Green Apple, Green Pear, Kiwi and Lime. I'm not sure what's in the purple one yet. If anyone wishes to add that information in, then we just need to find a reference/source. Would it also be beneficial to make a little table of some of the varieties?</br>
TheFartyDoctor Talk 15:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other types of Toxic Waste 
Wikipedia talk:Tools/Disable access keys

message: This page is highly uninformational, and from just reading it, I don't know what access keys are, and I'm not convinced to turn on this gadget. Please expand on this, because I, personally, don't want to have to read the whole page on access keys. Perhaps this can be like a proper Wikipedia essay, and you can have the template  with more information under it. All I'm asking is that you expand. Thanks. — Cuyler91093 - Contributions 05:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't know what the access keys are then they are evidently not bothering you, so you won't have to disable them :). It refers to key combinations like alt-shift-e in Firefox to edit pages, the exact combination of keys depends on your browser. The reason you might want to switch them off is that they override other functions that the key combinations might have. Example: In Firefox, with acces keys on, alt-shift-e goes to 'edit this page', but with access keys off, alt-shift-e opens the edit menu of the browser. See Wikipedia:Keyboard shortcuts for a list. On another note, I don't understand why the description page is full protected. Arthena(talk) 22:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reduced it to sprotected. — xaosflux Talk 06:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, I remember reading about that. I just forgot. Sorry, and thanks! — Cuyler91093 - Соитяівцтіоиѕ 04:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are access keys?
Talk:Hypercar (concept car)

message: So, billions have been poured into hypecars since 1994. That must be why there are so many of them. I realise that the claim is supported by a reference, albeit not third party, but, since the statement is at best an incredible and self serving exaggeration, should we not get a good third party ref, at least? Greg Locock (talk) 11:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Funny ref - billions

message: Well I didn't know about this project, I must say that the term "hypercar" is sometimes used to describe extreme high-end performance cars like the McLaren F1 and Bugatti Veyron, kind of like the terms "supercar" or "exotic" except for it is simplied to only the fastest and most exclusive cars.  Just wanted to mention that, maybe someone could change this article  --99Ferrari (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well to be honest I can't say I much like the word hypercar in either sense. Still, if you can find a reliable source that refers to rich man's toys as hypercars I guess we can use that to deflate this article's pomposity. Greglocock (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Top Gear has referred to hypercars in the performance sense. But it's not easy to cite a television program. 94.194.66.92 (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

text:  http://www.worldcarfans.com/110070827249/mclaren-f1-hypercar-successor-to-arrive-early-in-2012 **I dont know about the reliability  99.236.35.117 (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Supercar", "exotic" 

message: The Hypercar Inc. company which is the information source of much of the history section here now appears to also be history, along with the links.   A (spinoff?) website called www.hypercars.com makes preposterous claims of up to 12,000 miles per gallon for ‘similar’ vehicles on their website.
Should the lead sentence of this Wiki article be modified to. .
“The Hypercar WAS a design concept car . .” ?  
Delphwhite (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Update ? 
Talk:1931 College Football All-America Team

message: I don't think Schwartz was a unanimous selection. See here and here (page 5, * indicates unanimous). Lizard (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marchmont Schwartz 
Talk:Rumor in Town

message: I am new at creating articles so please forgive my ignorance.  I created this page in reference to changes that were being made by Mdahg on the Babe Dahlgren article.  My belief is that Mdahg is in fact the author of the book Rumor in Town and the grandson of Babe Dahlgren.  I posted to his my talk page that references made in the second paragraph may be biased and fall under Wikipedia:No original research. I also added the "Self published" bit in the External links section.   In the interest of balance I went ahead and created Rumor in Town citing that the book is in fact self published leading one to understand that his posts on this article are biased.  If this was the wrong way to follow up I apologize and agree with the deletion.  Can someone please point me in the right direction as to how an issue like this should be resolved, when an author of a post is citing references that fall under Wikipedia:No original research.  Please forgive my ignorance, and thank you for your time and privilege to post on this forum.--Low2snow (talk) 05:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Low2snow - what you're looking for is WP:COI, where you can find info about Conflict Of Interest and what to do about it. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 07:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argument against deletion
Talk:1948 Michigan Wolverines football team

message: Michigan's official records give the attendance of the Ohio State game as 78,603, but contemporary newspaper articles give it as 82,754. Right now both figures are listed in different places in the article, so it contradicts itself. Should we include both attendance figures with an explanation of the discrepancy, or should we favor one? TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance
Talk:1962 Rose Bowl

message: I believe that Sandy was also the first African American Rose Bowl Player of the Game. Group29 (talk) 23:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sandy Stephens
Talk:1997 Nebraska Cornhuskers football team

message: Why doesn't Nebraska football sports fire Scott Frost and Hire A Real Football Coach Nebraska football teams have always been a great football team untill Scott Frost took over, Now they couldn't win a game even if the other team forfitted the game. 108.231.114.156 (talk) 20:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nabraska Corn huskers Football
Talk:1999 Rose Bowl

message: I suggest combining "Game notes" and "Rose Bowl records" into one category: 
Rose Bowl records
---Individual
McNown
Dayne (--> combining the remarks from "Game notes" and "Aftermath")
---Team
--> using section, "For the teams, the following records were broken, but no longer stand."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrik Walter (talk • contribs) 13:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up "Game notes" / "Aftermath"
Talk:2001 Oklahoma State Cowboys football team

message: I just wikified the article, putting the makeshift table into a real wikitable, and fixed grammar.  Could someone find a reliable source?  DavidWS (contribs) 21:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 
Talk:2002 Miami Hurricanes football team

message: I object with every fiber of my being to the 2001 Miami Hurricanes being called "no doubt the best team in college football history". That is a subjective opinion. It should be deleted immediately. That phrase makes this a biased entry. DavidSteinle (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "no doubt the best team in college football history"?
Talk:2002 Ohio State Buckeyes football team

message: Why is it that OSU was able to schedule 13 regular season games during this season?  College football teams in the last decade have only been able to schedule a maximum of 12 regular season games, with the only exception being if they travel to Hawaii.  Then they are allowed to schedule a 13th game.  Given this rule, I think it's fair to include the reason that rule didn't apply to this team in this particular year.  Does anybody know the reason for this?Kp.murphy (talk) 15:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 Game Regular Season Schedule 
Talk:2005 Fiesta Bowl

message: 12-0 before or after the Fiesta Bowl?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.183.169 (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear on Utah record
Talk:2007 NCAA Division I FCS football season

message: The See Also section should only contain links to relevant articles. If you open the list to any FCS school, the list will grow rapidly and be unusable. I'm not even sure the other 2 schools should be listed there. Jrssr5 14:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also 
Talk:History of Air Force Falcons football

message: This article is not "a full history of Air Force Falcons football." It's just a list of the results of each game and stat leaders from 1955 to 1959, with a partial list of games from 1960. This article should have content that goes beyond what is in the Air Force Falcons Football article. This just isn't history.--RLent (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs some serious work

message: The content here was not providing much value and much of it duplicated content on season articles, like 2007 Air Force Falcons football team.  So, I have redirected it to Air Force Falcons football.  It could be expanded back into an article down the road. Jweiss11 (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Andean white-eared opossum

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Derby's Woolly Opossum which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The used photograph is edited. In the original photo, the animal is being held by the tail and has a cord around it's necl. It is misleading and by the was a cruel original photo and photoshopping the cruel parts out is not ok. 178.197.200.203 (talk) 10:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited photo
Talk:Billy Taylor (running back, born 1949)

message: These say 1949  . WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date? 
Talk:Black Bear Sports Network

message: I'm trying to figure out how to mention that the FM flagship for the Black Bears is WKSQ as of this season, instead of WAEI-FM (which has not only been booted from 97.1 FM in a swap with WBFB, but now also WBFB's old 104.7 FM to create the new WBAK). WAEI's AM side still exists and is still a flagship, and it airs what had been the WAEI exclusives (baseball, softball, etc.) as well as basketball; it also is the only Bangor station to run the coaches' shows, which would make almost no sense in WKSQ's hot AC format (not that Black Bears play-by-play is that much of a fit with the format either, but that's another story). Somehow the article needs an update to reflect this… but I'm a bit baffled as to how… --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed — flagship shift 
Talk:Bob Hitchens

message: I have found several sources that say that Hitchens played "for two years with three NFL teams" and that those three teams are the Patriots, Chiefs, and Steelers, but I cannot source which years he played for which teams, or really any other information at all. He does not have a profile on ProFootballReference.com or NFL.com either. OceanGunfish (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would love to see a reliable source with information about Hitchens' NFL career.
Talk:Bowl Championship Series on television and radio

message: There are conflicting numbers for the contracts and who is getting paid what by whom according to what I can find. ABC always had a separate deal for the Rose Bowl, and picked up the Orange and Fiesta in 1999. They had the Sugar since 1971. Group29 (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contract Numbers
Talk:Ukrainian Cup

message: Semi–finalists column is incomplete, there are 4 semi-finalists missing.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Performances
Talk:Brock Kreitzburg

message: This article has no references or sources. It sounds like it was written by a PR person or even the subject himself. I think a lot of the extraneous information should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.219.180.27 (talk) 10:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 
Talk:Bryant Bulldogs football

message: Currently the title is "Bryant Bulldogs football" but perhaps it should be "Bryant university football", or perhaps the whole article should be merge with "Bryant Bulldogs". Jason Quinn (talk) 02:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as every college or university's football team page (if one exists) follows the exact same naming convention: "(School Name) (Nickname) football". Please note that in the School Name, only key words are used; in other words, "University," "College," etc are dropped. Jrcla2 (talk) 06:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change or merge?
Talk:Oak Ridge High School (Orlando, Florida)

message: Somebody needs to put the oakridge soccer team  and volleyball team, district champions and state finalists 2004-2006
http://www.fhsaa.org/sites/default/files/orig_uploads/records/rec_vbb.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.100.95.194 (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Chris Johnson (safety, born 1971)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose — No need for a unnecessary distribution. Christ T. Johnson has a middle initial which tells that its a different person than Chris Johnson (safety). CookieMonster755 (talk) 02:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Corey Davis (offensive lineman)

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080504093613/http://www.georgiaforce.com/players/2008/Davis,%20Corey.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  —Bagumba (talk) 09:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ramada (shelter)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-01-3 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I think it would be useful to add a link referring to the pergola, a similar structure used in wetter climates.Jeandm (talk) 18:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  confer "pergola" 

message: I noticed firefox says it's not a word. So, I looked it up, finding it mostly gets me results about a hotel with no ramadas. This is a MAJOR, EVERYDAY word in Arizona, referring to everyday structures. So... What do other people call them? I'm curious now. It's "ramada" to me, through and through, it's a 100% correct term. In fact, it's THE term here, so thus for me. But, what do others say? Pavilion? What? *checks* One in a story I'm working on can be called a ramada, or a pavilion. It's not a gazebo. Gazebos are to my knowledge always free-standing structures, round, and more like walled structures, as they might even have walls, and they always have walls or railings. The one I'm featuring is connected to two railed, and roofed walkways/deckways/bridges, and is a square, so I'd never call it a gazebo. To me, it's a raised (over water) ramada that the paths meet up with, and is also called a pavilion. To me, a ramada is simply a four-posted roof with no walls, usually square, but otherwise still a rectangle when not square. I guess it could have more posts/columns, and be other shapes... Certainly not circular. Gazebos are circular, while ramadas are rectangular. Gazebos are classy, little, rich, European things, while ramadas can be fancy, or cheap, pretty, or ugly, and are usually in the bad sides of those spectrums. (Most ramadas are in parks, playground, and on farms and ranches. Usually they're made of wood, steel, brick, and/or concrete/cement, with either dirt, or concrete/cement for the ground/floor under the roof. They tend to be very cheap, and meant for shade, and protection from rain, not for being pretty. Ramadas are for functional uses, unlike their useless gazebo cousins. It'd be good to tell us other words for ramadas, and to have similar structures in a see also section. --174.19.181.117 (talk) 03:31, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms/Similes Would Be Good
Talk:Seamless3d

message: The tag warning this article may not meet the general notability guideline was added within hours of this article being submitted, this was however before I had added references and any categorizations for the article. I was late to do this because I am new to wikipedia format.
I believe Seamless3d has notability  because it is non proprietary, free open source software with no copyleft restrictions, has been around since 2001, has demonstrated it can create high quality content and is used by different people from around the globe. Seamless3d is especially good at verifying itself independently because it has a built in software robot that can simulate a user using it and the source code is open to public scrutiny.
Thymefromti (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, I added the tag when on New Page patrol, which is often the way new articles are picked up. The 'references needed' tag is not a warning, or any kind of criticism or threat. Rather it is an encouragement to editors who are knowledgable about a subject to add material that will protect and improve an article. So far, all of the sources that have been added are useful expansions to descriptions of the software, but none of them meet the criterion for independent sources. Have a look here for a description of sources for verification. Also this related criterion is one for websites - not software, but it might give a clue as to the kind of sources needed. In simple terms, a good reference would be to be able to say in the text of the article something like: "This program has been used by the General Widget Corporation in the development of their next range of nano-widgets" with a reference to the issue, page number and author of the New York Times article which announced the General Widgets news. Some kind of similar independent assertion of notability is what's needed here, not a restatement of the inherent qualities of Seamless3d. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 13:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled