lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of women's rights activists

message: This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Giselle m22.
:help 2405:201:C039:C03D:39E6:9F8A:78:5D49 (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: clearance of the case, hima bindu 2405:201:C039:C03D:39E6:9F8A:78:5D49 (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: You may want to consider adding the following women to the "list": Felisa Rincón de Gautier, Balnca Canales, María Cadilla and Ana María O'Neill. Cheers. Tony the Marine 20:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Women activists

message: A suggestion: it may be a good idea to divide this article in to sections after nationality, such as in List of suffragists and suffragettes, such as "Swedish women's rights activists", "American women's rights activists", and so forth. it is easily done, but I do not have the time at present, so I thought I should mention it. --Aciram (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The United States list is getting long. Ok to put the names in alphbetical order? Rosalina523 (talk) 16:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality section
Talk:Army–Navy Screen Magazine

message: Here is another source that may be helpful in expanding the information in the article: 
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/world-war-ii-the-movie-21103597/ 2600:6C52:7800:FE69:9553:6ACB:BD1A:D99D (talk) 02:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Source
Talk:Hacklab

message: Why is this in the Anarchism section? Sure some hacklabs are anarchist but there are probably more that aren't. I don't see the need to put an idealogical brand on them.
Good point, removed. W1tchkr4ft 00 (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

message: I've never heard or read anything implying that there is an ideological difference between the terms hackerspace and hacklab. The hackerspace I attend has been referred to both as Abbenay hackspace and Abbenay hacklab, based on personal preferrence. While we certainly fit the bill for the sort of space described here, I have never seen these described as anything else than synonyms. Merge. - Anarkitekt (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support a merge. I haven't been able to find any sources that draw a distinction between hacklabs and hackerspaces. I've moved some content over to hackerspace and will redirect this page there. Gobonobo T C 13:26, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  hacklab == hackerspace
Talk:Lathe of Heaven (film)

message: Nothing is gained by removing it.  I can't add any details because I've never seen it.  But even as it is, it does a job.--GwydionM (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In future, just take off the prod notice! There is significant coverage, see http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22Lathe+of+Heaven%22+%22james+caan%22&cf=all. Fences&Windows 20:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not delete 

message: Is it definitely a remake of the 1980 version? Just because it's based on the same source, doesn't automatically make it a remake. 87.244.106.227 (talk) 18:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like reliable sources apply the term "remake" to this, so it is probably fine as it is. I think the term is supposed to be loosely applied. The initial film adaptation was made in 1980, and they repeated the adaptation process (remade). The term just indicates that it is not the first time an adaptation has been done. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitely a remake? 

message: This would be better served by having the Plot section replaced with a short synopsis and recategorized as a stub. The current Plot section basically just recapitulates the first 5-10 minutes in way too much detail and abruptly ends.  The wording makes it terribly unclear this is what is happening, and a gross error occurs when it states that his lawyer sends him to see a psychiatrist. It's the judge.  Also, it's far from obvious that it's a futuristic society. I'm a bit surprised that it won an award and suspect an argument could be made that its notability doesn't warrant its own article, but it would be better to remove what doesn't work and let someone have a crack at it then leave such a shoddy plot summary in place. 47.36.18.210 (talk) 22:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT? DonIago (talk) 02:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot should be removed or replaced
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Uuttyyrreess

message: This is a load of Nonsense. This is false. If we were to follow Mr.Neutrons logic User:Mr. Neutron User:Laveol User:Gligan are sock puppets as they all constantly put false information in Articles relating to The Republic Of Macedonia in an attempt to spread propaganda.
Alexander the great1 18:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As for Matrix I think he has nothing to do with these guys. The style of the others though does seem a bit similar. But then again they might be just following the same goals, following Mr. Neutrons contribs and undoing them. And, Matrix, for the following cases you cite, mind that the sockpuppetry was found unrelated and the [[Macedonia[[ edit war was in no way his fault. --Laveol T 19:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aviva Cantor

message: The Jewish Women's Archive holds the copyright to this text and as an employee of the organization I have been given full permission for its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.Mrudnick87 18:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was surprised to see that the Jewish LIberation Hagada, 1971, is not listed in the bibliography section. I've added it. ArielZBenjamin (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish Liberation Hagada
Talk:Kim Chernin

message: The Jewish Women's Archive holds the copyright to this text and as an employee of the organization I have been given full permission for its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.Mrudnick87 18:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GFDL licensing of content

message: It's in need of quite a trim, in my opinion. Anything that can't be found in third party sources needs to go. The article will be a lot better as a result; easier to read and more encyclopedic. WP:V needs to be observed here. --91.135.14.165 (talk) 22:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I took it upon myself to remove much that violated WP:NOR, WP:PEACOCK, and various other of our policies. Would anyone like to help add some properly referenced stuff in? I feel sure it exists. --John (talk) 23:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I've added some more referenced and appropriate material. Do we think the refimprove is still merited? I can find a lot of these claims only on Chernin's own website and would be happier with better sourcing. We could really do with an expert in the field. --John (talk) 05:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Trim

message: Needs to be split into cats.--John (talk) 02:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --John (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books
Talk:Camp Ramah in California

message: Someone who has good reason for one form of transliteration over the other might make the appropriate change across all the Camp Ramah articles.  Right now they differ, and people are RVing each other (as on this article page).  Tx.  --Epeefleche 18:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eidot or Edot?
Category talk:Hong Kong geography stubs

message: To add Hong Kong to the category page, as per the practice across all other HK stub categories and HK categories, which are all subcategories of the by country, Asian or East Asian categories of the same topic. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Skier Dude (talk) 02:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Stephen St.Croix

message: St.Croix was a notable audio engineer-producer inventor. If you do a Google search, you will see that he has so many accomplishments. Not having him at WP is a dishonor and no different than not having Einstein listed here (See search Google).
If you are not an audio professional, then that might explain why you don't see the significance of his contributions to the audio industry in the world.
:Is this material copied from another source?  Can you provide reliable sources to verify the claims in the article?  Corvus cornix 21:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read about Stephen St.Croix, and his cool articles on Mix magazine. I've also have talked to people who learned audio through his own devices and techniques and that's why I thought it would be important to have him here at WP. His accomplishments are well known and documented, so I am only writing  what every engineer knows. Mix magazine is a reliable source I was told by User:illuminatedwax, so I am going to have to go with that. After all, the guy wrote articles there. Anyway, this is just the beginning, I will continue to build on this foundation and see if I can get a picture of him uploaded. Trust me, this guy was amazing, for real. Jrod2 03:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second all of that!  He was a genius and a legend. --PM - PhilyG talk 19:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nokia 8110

message: The page says 8110 was released 1998. I bought mine Summer 1997 and it wasn't brand new model even then, so I suspect the release date on the page might need some restudy.
Zds 18:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, that's bothered me too. *#8110# on one of my 8110s gives a date of 1996, and 1997 on another. Wonder where to find the proper release date? Lewis Collard! (natter) 20:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, the date was in the Nokia press release. 1996 it is! Lewis Collard! (natter) 21:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: This statement cites https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/11/a-history-of-arm-part-2-everything-starts-to-come-together/ , which in turn cites this Wikipedia article. I think this is a bad case of circular reference.
Anyway, https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/history-of-the-mobile-form-factor states that the first phone to use an ARM CPU was the Nokia 6110, which the corresponding Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_6110) also states.
All in all, I think the 'The phone was also the first GSM cellphone to use an ARM processor' sentence should be removed from this article. 90.247.190.199 (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  'The phone was also the first GSM cellphone to use an ARM processor' contradiction
Talk:Shelter Island, New York

message: I removed this, because there was no source, no reference cited, and not Wiki policy. If someone can find a source for it, it can be added back in. --K72ndst 19:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics 

message: I moved this entry to this page; per Wiki policy, just being old isn't notable. Who is this person and what is he notable for? Google search turned up a dentist and an attorney. -- K72ndst (talk) 14:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Residents 

message: This section does not have any sources or attribution, and has a shaky POV. -- K72ndst (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Government
Talk:Books for Africa

message: Books for Africa is a highly notable non-profit organization - it is small, but it has made a huge impact by locally collecting books & partnering with a number of NGO's to distribute books to communities. It has been reviewed by the Minnesota Charities Review Board, CharityNavigator.org & the U.S. State Department’s Bureau of International Information Programs; all links have been included as sources. Literacy123 19:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide verifiable sources.  Thanks.  --Iknowyourider (t c) 19:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - I'm pretty new, so thanks for the input. I put the report from the Washington File (as well as the direct pages for Charity Navigator, etc) as an external link at the bottom; don't those qualify as 'verifiable' sources? I read the verifiable link that you included above and it seems to me that they do; if not, please explain. thanks very much Literacy123 20:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

text:  is the Washington File link;  http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/search.summary/orgid/3373.htm is the Charity Navigator link for verificationLiteracy123 20:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Washington File piece is perfect.  I'm removing the speedy request.  Thanks!  --Iknowyourider (t c) 20:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much!Literacy123 20:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suppose that most of the books are in English, but a cursory look at their site tells me they also print Somali books and deliver French-language books.
Could we have a rough statistic of the language of the books they deliver?
--Error (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language
Talk:Ilsidahur

message: I have tagged the sentence
"He particularly prizes objects made of bronze. It is assumed his layer of the Guttering Grove is a jungle realm filled with bar-lguras, nalfeshnees and other simian monsters"
as being original research, as the source of the opinions expressed have not been made explicit. --Gavin Collins (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research
Talk:United Campaign Against Plastic Bullets

message: Several key issues on the article are badly outdated, i.e. the organisation status post-2007 following the demise of Mrs. Groves or the current use of plastic bullets by the PSNI, especially after Operation Banner was over. I will restore the tag if matters are not brought up to date in a reasonable time.--Darius (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed
Talk:Disney's Fairy Tale Wedding Pavilion

message: This article is poorly written and lacks a clear focus. The title suggests it's about the physical site at Walt Disney World Resort but much of the content is about the overall business of Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons, whether the ceremonies take place at the Wedding Pavilion or not. Plus, it has a gushing tone that suggests it might contain text copied from Disney publicity material:
:* Multiple locations around Disney Property transform into magical reception halls to hold the reception of a Fairy Tale Wedding.
:* Picture Point is located at the side of the Pavilion, and provides a stunning photo opportunity for newly married couples.
Information about the weddings program should be spun off into its own NPOV article. This one only should be about the pavilion itself. —Whoville (talk) 17:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a new article for Disney's Fairy Tale Weddings & Honeymoons to cover the wedding and honeymoon services offered by Disney, a new article for Disney's Wedding Pavilion (the Walt Disney World venue's correct name according to the disneyweddings.com site), and placed a redirect on this article. —Whoville (talk) 18:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions needed
Talk:Demand-chain management

message: history of demand driven supply network:
(cur) (last)  13:23, 16 June 2007 172.153.131.146 (Talk) (394 bytes) 
(cur) (last)  17:31, 12 April 2007 SmackBot (Talk | contribs) m (Date/fix the maintenance tags) 
(cur) (last)  17:59, 11 April 2007 Bissinger (Talk | contribs) (merge request) 
(cur) (last)  17:57, 11 April 2007 Bissinger (Talk | contribs) m (moved DDSN to Demand-driven supply network: acronym guidelines) 
(cur) (last)  16:32, 5 April 2007 SmackBot (Talk | contribs) m (Date/fix the maintenance tags) 
(cur) (last)  19:25, 9 December 2006 SmackBot (Talk | contribs) m (Date/correct the maintenance tags using AWB) 
(cur) (last)  13:53, 22 July 2006 MarshBot (Talk | contribs) (Adding  template to orphan article) 
(cur) (last)  17:42, 24 May 2005 Bjwebb (Talk | contribs) 
(cur) (last)  05:13, 19 October 2004 217.226.37.155 (Talk) 
(cur) (last)  00:22, 22 June 2004 Angela (Talk | contribs) (expand and wikify) 
(cur) (last)  15:31, 15 June 2004 198.54.202.2 (Talk) 
(cur) (last)  15:30, 15 June 2004 198.54.202.2 (Talk)
This is an ugly, ugly page with many typos, repeated text, and missing text.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.145.10.18 (talk) 21:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: These two seem to be talking about the same topic. Epicgenius (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Parts of it are a copy of Supply chain that's why that was my first guess.  But yours seems to be a more plausible target. Zeus t | u | c 14:26, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Demand driven supply chain]]
Talk:Roy Newell

message: I removed the tags because I had an edit conflict and it was easier to undo them, and because I thought the edit I made took care of the problems (the article was copied from AFC to preserve the original author's contribution).  If you think there are still problems, feel free to re-add the tags.  delldot talk 19:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Northwood Hills tube station

message: Are there really four?
: There most certainly are not four. The 'fast' tracks running south of and parallel to those platforms which are in operation are visible from the bridge over the line, from the eastern side of Joel St just south of the station entrance, and there are no platforms there - looked myself a couple of days ago. If there ever were any they have been removed. At the back of the northbound platform (which is at the south of the platform level of the station) there is a high wall (at least 6 foot), dividing the accessible staiton area from the fast tracks. I've changed the number to two in the article. - Killyleagh 05:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: platforms

message: I've done several bits of tweaking to this article. First, as noted under 'Platforms', I've changed the number of platforms in the sidebox to 2, the true number. Second, I've added the information that it is a London Underground station with a link to that article, rather than merely a 'tube station', although who on earth would look up Northwood Hills tube station and not know what the tube is I have no idea. In addition, I've clarified the information on services: previously it was just that it was mainly served by trains to Watford and slow Amersham and Chesham trains, which don't stop between H-on-the-Hill and Moor Park. I've clarified the wording of that existing section slightly and added a bit on the terminus stations of the southbound services. I've also added the general off-peak service frequency. The additions in this section are based on my own experience of using the line and the ten minute figure (which regular users of the Met line will know is variably honoured both in the breach and the observance) comes from TfL's timetables on their website. To top it off, I've changed the reference of all existing and new links which refer to tube stations to the actual station pages rather than the local-area ones (so Harrow_on_the_Hill has become Harrow_on_the_Hill_tube_station), which I believe is better for this page - tube station pages generally have links to area pages in any case. 
Also, can anyone confirm where the information on the name competition comes from? I'd be interested in knowing as I've never heard of it before. - Killyleagh 05:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions and changes
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 20, 2007

message: In an effort to keep nonfree images off the main page, per consensus on the nonfree media policy and specific requests from Jimbo, I've found a free picture of Nobuo Uematsu on Commons to illustrate this article instead.  It's a lousy picture for sure (my pleas to Flickr users with better photographs of the developers went unheeded), but it's better than a copyrighted box cover on the main page for sure.  Alternately, we can eliminate a picture on the blurb altogether, which I have no objections to either.  Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 19:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: here is the diff. GracenotesT § 23:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's better than no image at all. So where is it then? — Bluerで す。 07:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jack McGee (actor)

message: The film, Crash, was nominated for a number of Academy Awards and won most of them. The one that effects McGree as a cast member is the "Best Picture" win. Perhaps that information should be entered into the Notes column. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Crash'' won Academy Award's "Best Picture" 

message: 1. "In 1977, he became a firefighter for the New York City Fire Department in order to pursue his acting career." 
Why did joining the fire department help him pursue his acting career? Did it help him befriend Steve Buscemi or something? B^) This sounds like a non-sequitur to me.
2. McGee is currently featured in The McCarthys on CBS in the USA, Thursday at 9:30P. Can someone who knows how to add citations and work with tables please add the show to the list? Thank you, 24.47.173.120 (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The above comment was posted by me: Wordreader (talk) 04:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No response to this #1. query, therefore, "Citation needed" tag applied. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 18:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two items.... 
Wikipedia talk:Template index/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference

message: This page was redirected to Citation templates. I can't find any discussion about this. If there is, please point me to it. If not, then please don't make this kind of change without consensus. It has already inconvenienced one user. Tyrenius 19:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: The  and  examples on the project page show three quotes on each side of the required title, but this causes bolding of the title which others have found irregular. 
  | title = REQUIRED 
Should these bolding quotes be removed from the examples?  Skeet Shooter (talk) 12:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed that. -- Tomdo08 (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Quotes Needed In Title? 

message: Do I have to cut and past the whole template each time?  Or should I be able to just put in cite web inside curly bars and then the fields appear?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.82.33.250 (talk) 06:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the question would then be, do you want ALL of the fields to appear? I find it more useful to create several "boiler plate" templates configured to what I usually want, and then copy them in as needed. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  help (what to cut and paste)
Talk:Malay languages

message: Is there any connection between Malay languages and Malayalam? Biscuittin (talk) 20:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not unless it's the name. But that's probably just coincidence: Malayālam means 'mountainous', and derives from mala 'mountain', so it can't come from Malay. Malay is Məlayu; I don't know it comes from. — kwami (talk) 02:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. The reason I ask is that I've just discovered the word Godown (warehouse).  This word seems to be widely used in India. According to my dictionary, it is a Malay word but I think it might be Malayalam. Do you know? Biscuittin (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but remember, much of Malaysia/Indonesia was once Hindu/Buddhist (there's a reason it's called "Indo-China"), and there are lots of Indian words in Malay. Pancasila, for example. — kwami (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malayalam