lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant

message: Why not say 1.27 Gigawatts, instead of 1,270 Megawatts? - MSTCrow 19:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's usually just done that way.  It makes sense when you're expecting to see 600 MWe plants as well. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 13:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wattage 

message: Someone keeps deleting information about the actual environmental impacts of the Seabrook plant, but leaving in a misleading comparison to a coal-fired plant, which was never planned for Seabrook nor ever existed. One might as well compare it to a gas-fired power plant, or conservation measures. But such comparisons still say *nothing* about the actual impacts of the plant. I have added information about the seawater temperature and processing impacts, but they immediately get deleted. They, however, are true impacts, not misleading comparisons.
I think this section/entry should be locked and sent to an arbitrator.
Hmarcuse 07:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have GOT to be kidding.  You gave NO source for the "processing impacts," you know why?  Because it's a COMPLETE fabrication.  I can't even find something saying that when I try.  No reliable source anywhere says that nuclear power contributes more to climate change than fossil units, what you posted about chlorfluorocarbons with enrichment is simply false science.  I don't know if you read it somewhere or just made it up yourself, either way it's a simple fabrication.  And like I said, it shouldn't even go here if it's not in Uranium enrichment.  Go ahead and ask for an arbitrator, see if I care, you're a troll. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 13:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading comparison 

message: As someone who lived in the 10 mile radius for 20+ years I find it amazing so much of an article about Seabrook Station is given to the opposition of the plant.
The clam shell alliance was so important it gets the second paragraph in the open?
Almost the entire "History" is dedicated to opposition of the plant?   One sentence dedicated to that actual 40+ years of the actual plant?
I sit in amazement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterWesco (talk • contribs) 03:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It became very clear this POV shift happened with this edit:  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seabrook_Station_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=475923316.  I have reverted it back to "last known good".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterWesco (talk • contribs) 03:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Two-stream instability

message: Can we add a section for the related "oscillating" two-stream instability to this article, and then add redirects from Oscillating two stream instability and Oscillating two-stream instability? Thx. Figure it would make more sense to have both covered in one article and then have redirects rather than having to maintain separate pages... Is Oscillating two stream instability synonymous with two stream instability, or is there a technical difference between thee two. IE, one oscillates and the other doesn't? Or one oscillates more than the other? Mgmirkin 19:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oscillating two-stream instability

message: Just wondering what the ACTUAL naming convention for this instability is. IE, does it have a '-' (dash) or not? IE, is it 'two-stream instability' or 'two stream instability'? Let's be internally consistent. The title uses 'Two stream instability,' but the first line uses 'two-stream instability.' Let's pick one and go with it, but let's pick the right one. I just don't know which is more technically correct or more consistently used in the literature. Currently, I've put in a redirect from Two-stream instability to here, on the assumption that the naming on the Instability page is correct? If not, we might wantto correct it there too, if it requires a '-' (dash). Minor quibble. Just wouldn't hurt to be consistent. Encyclopedic formatting and all that good rubbish. Mgmirkin 19:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming convention? Dash or no dash?

message: Noticed the following line in the latter part of the article: "In the case of the two stream instability, when an electron stream is injected to the plasma, the particle's velocity distribution function has a 'bump' on its 'tail'." 
I'm wondering, then, if Two stream instability is synonymous with Bump-in-tail instability (on the page for Plasma Physics requests), if so, perhaps we could note the alternate name in the beginning of the article, with a mention of why. Mgmirkin 19:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bump-in-tail instability?
Talk:Lillian Fuchs

message: Note for anyone who is tempted (as I was) to "correct" the birth year from 1901 to 1903 based on a reference source like Grove's or The Harvard Biographical Dictionary of Music: the entry on Fuchs at Judith Pinnolis's "Contributions of Jewish Women to Music" (see Sources) includes the following:
Born, November 18, 1901. Died, October 5, 1995. (Her birth and death dates are incorrectly listed in New Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians/ Online, Baker's Biographical, Jewish Women in America and other reference sources. Possibly one reason was incorrect information was listed in her obituary in The New York Times printed Oct. 7, 1995. The NYTimes did print a correction --the correction appeared Oct. 10, 1995. However, many researchers did not find that. The dates I give above are verified by two government sources, the US Census and the Social Security Death Index.
 Languagehat (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got liner notes from the recording of the Bach cello suites that claim birth in 1903 to death in August of 1991. I don't have access to Groves at the moment, but is there a confusion there about the death date as well as the birth date? 
J Lorraine (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I see the Grove Online claims (b New York, 18 Nov 1902; d Englewood, NJ, 5 Oct 1995). So I'm guessing the liner notes are mistaken.
74.126.230.148 (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: The unsourced statement that Miss Fuchs "was the first to perform... the Bach Suites for the viola" seems suspicious to me, given that Louis Svecenski, of the Kneisel Quartet and the Boston Symphony Orchestra, had published his transcription of the Bach suites for viola in 1916, well before she had taken up the viola. Is one to suppose that he never performed any of his transcriptions?
As for the recordings, Samuel Lifschey beat her into the recording studio, in 1941, although  only to record the gavottes of the sixth suite. (If, perhaps, additional movements were recorded, the recordings were not issued.) He, too, had published a transcription of the suites, in 1936.
These are just the American performers and editors that I know about. I don't know what may have been going on in Europe around the same time. 
--Gambaguru (talk) 05:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Bach "firsts" accurate?
Talk:Zara Levina

message: her name appears (ok, I think...) as "Levin, Sara", far enough away from Zara Levina to modern eyes I guess that one might miss her piano sonata (published in 1928) if one didn't pronounce the names, compare, notice the Russian publisher, etc.  Of course, I suppose it might be someone else, that... Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Hofmeisters 
Talk:Little Norway, Wisconsin

message: This picture should be readded to the article when there is enough text to support it without a great deal of blank space. :File:LittleNorwayEntrance.jpg --Danger (talk) 02:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo queue

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Little Norway Guide2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 4, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-05-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 20:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Little Norway Guide2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Endiang

message: First of all, thanks to whoever seems to be the other main contributor to this page.  I apologise for no references on the page, as most of this comes from first hand knowledge.  This Was Endiang is a great text, and some of this information may be found there.  If anyone takes issue with my changes and additions, I welcome discussion.  Anything that can be done to make this page better would be great.
--Legars 19:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Soviet occupation zone in Germany

message: Hi. The Soviet Zone also included other regions of Eastern Europe which had been de facto annexed by the Nazis. This includes regions like Prussia for example, but see Nazi Germany for a definition of 'Germany proper' in the context of WWII and Nazi expansion. I think this should be explained in this article becasue the NKVD special camps in Germany 1945–49 interred prisoners from all over that zone apparently, as part of the thorough denazification process.  RhinoMind (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much larger
Talk:List of capitals outside the territories they serve

message: User:Riso on 19 Nov 2006 wrote:
Links added from: Vienna, Prague, Niederosterreich, Central Bohemian Region
Maybe this should be added: Bogotá, Colombia is the capital of the departament of Cundinamarca, but it's not a part of it, since it's considered a "Capital District" 201.244.111.29 (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Todd and Shannon counties have capitals outside their borders, but are not included in the list. Please include them!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.190.210.221 (talk) 23:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And why didn't you include them yourself? If you can edit the talk page, you can edit the article as well. And please sign your comment the next time. --UrsoBR (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: South Dakota
Talk:2002 Japan animal cruelty case

message: I fixed a translation error. The CD has "私は敗北主義者です。" written on it.
"敗北主義" means "defeatism," but "敗北主義者" means "defeatist." Thus, I corrected the mistranslation/typo. KyleGoetz 14:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation error 

message: The NEDM label on the image references a YTMND fad, which originated form a case of cat cruelty. This seems a tad inappropriate (TariqAlSuave 21:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEDM 
Talk:Soviet Military Administration in Germany

message: Seriously? Germans in the areas east of the Oder-Neisse line were ethnically cleansed. They were expelled and robbed several times along the way of the few items they were allowed to take with them and allowed to contract awful diseases due to being herded together. Loads died as a result. I guess no-one cared that much because of what was done in their name during the Third Reich but don't pretend they were resettled and didn't have to give up all they owned. Those that survived the expulsion arrived in the west totally destitute. How is anyone allowed to pretend otherwise?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frew.gerry (talk • contribs) 17:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germans living in these areas were resettled, retaining almost all their belongings
Talk:Reboiler

message: The article says that "Steam usually provides the heat required for the vaporization."  Why?  It seems like there ought to be plenty of other candidates as heat sources - so why steam? —BarrelProof (talk) 20:35, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Refinerys and chemical plants usually have a steam system to meet process heating requirements. Condensing steam provides sufficient heat and temperature for most vaporization needs.  However, there are instances where higher temparatures are required and a special heat transfer fluid like Dowtherm is used.  Sandcherry (talk) 22:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why steam as the heat source?

message: The SVG version of Figure 1 depicts the inlet line from the tower bottoms as being connected to the bottoms product outlet line ... which is wrong. One of the two lines should be broken at the crossing point (as in the original PNG version) to indicate that they are not connected.
The word "Bottoms" is practically touching the line ... which is poor practice. There should be more space between "Bottoms" (and "Product") and the actual line, again as in the original PNG version.
Replaced the SVG version with the original PNG version. mbeychok (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: SVG version of Figure 1
Template talk:Airline destinations

message: Should the left column link to the continent or the list?  I think they should link to the continent and the links in the rest of the table should link to the destination lists.  Vegaswikian 19:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is going to be split by continent, right? I think having the left column link to the lists would make more sense, since it serves as a navigation template for the 7 (more like 6, since Antarctica doesn't have commercial service) individual lists. DB (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template layout 

message: With the last set of changes, thanks by he way, the template looks about ready to use. I guess we can start moving the data to the project page and then update the template as required.  The colors still need some work.  Vegaswikian 22:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the page be moved to Wikipedia:Airline destination lists as I proposed, or to the project (or somewhere else entirely)? DB (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just voted support on your move proposal.  I think a seperate project is reasonable given the size of the list, the fact that several projects will be using it and that not everyone in the other two related projects are not going to be interested. Vegaswikian 01:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ready for use?
Template talk:Real Salt Lake squad

message: I have no idea why purple is being used. There's none on the club clours here or here.  sʟυмɢυм • т • c  19:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't sure what to think when someone first changed it to purple, but I'm beginning to see their point: 1.) the red used in the RSL jerseys is pretty purplish, as reds go, 2.) every damn MLS team seems to use red, 3.) the purple template looks more distinctive while still looking oddly appropriate (red + blue, after all), 4.) there's the association with Real Madrid, 5.) the team uses purple for a few purposes, and there's been talk of bringing out a RM-style purple third.  I'm not wedded to the purple, but I like it. Bill Oaf 04:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purple
Talk:Palace Hotel

message: I removed the following three items:
;Canada
*Palace Hotel, Nanaimo, former hotel (c.1889) and now pub at 275 Skinner Street
*Palace Hotel, Vancouver, former slumhouse at 37 West Hastings Street
*Palace Arms Hotel, a low-frills hotel in Toronto c. 1892 at 950 King Street West
These are all currently redlinks which do not comply with wp:DABRL for their inclusion in a DAB page.  They have no sources provided and are not appropriate for inclusion into a list-article/SIA, either.  Who knows, they may be entirely made up, fraudulent items.  Please present sourcing and otherwise discuss here. Please do not return them to the page without consensus here. --Doncram (talk) 15:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  redlink items
Talk:Augite

message: The Chemical formulas listed for Augite in the sidebar and the main text seem to contradict each other.  Which is correct?
:Hum, they both seem to be incorrect. The nomenclature of the pyroxenes is defined by Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names of the International Mineralogical Association (final report)and Augite is a "quadrilateral" pyroxene, space group C2/c and "main composition" (Ca,Mg,Fe2+)2SiO3. It is still named augite if it has up to 20% of (NaFe3+) or (NaAl) component (more than this and it is aegirine-augite or omphacite, respectively) less then about 20% Ca leads to a change in space group (to P21/c) and then it's called pigeonite. 45-50% Ca and you are in the diopside - hedenbergite solid solution. This is not to say that you cannot have other elements in an augite crystal - but they are not a necessary component so should not be listed in the chemical formula (but noted elsewhere on the page). And don't take my percentages too literally, you have to do some interesting normalisations - and the normalisations are different for the Ca-Mg-Fe and the (NaAl)-(NaFe3+)-(Ca,Fe,Mg) plots. Andreww 20:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Vsmith (talk) 03:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Animal Cops: San Francisco

message: I just saw a post on Facebook in reference to a call about an injured seagull on the beach and it said, "Sgt. Sadler." L.J. Tibbs (talk) 16:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Ranks 
Talk:Luis Fernando Figari

message: I am concerned that all articles that are written about Luis Fernando Figari and his Sodalite family are copy-and-paste histories written by the group itself.  There is a lot of criticism that has appeared in the press about him and his organizations that goes unrepresented. 69.157.124.74 19:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kobol

message: Original series image would be nice. 132.205.44.134 00:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rqimg

message: So I noticed this redirects from Kobal.  I assume this is a common misspelling of this planet's name.  However, it is also the name of a demon within Christian belief and mythology.  Theological scholars and people interested in the occult might be looking for a page on that particular demon.  You may wish to change this redirect.  At one point it seems there may have been a page dedicated to Kobal as in a page listing names of demons his name appears as a valid page link. 69.204.200.18 (talk) 04:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If we have sources for a demon called Kobal we can write an article Kobal (demon) and put a link at the top of this article, or make the redirect a dab page showing both. ϢereSpielChequers 10:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: I always thought "Lords of Kobol" to denote an ancient, extinct race was an in-joke with ancient COBOL programmers... :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.47.188.2 (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  COBOL 

message: There is a line in the article that talks about happenings in the last episode of the reimagined series.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.150.59.177 (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  spoiler alert 

message: Almost every paragraph in this article has a cite request, most of which appear to be from the same...yeah, I'll call them a vandal. Either way, it's a clear example of what happens when cite requests become either a form of vandalization, a computer-era variation on the old psychological torture we used to bestow on our parents - asking "why?" about everything we're told or we see, just to drive them mad enough to pull out their hair and/or our own scalps! - or a simple case of people not wanting to do their own homework to *provide* those cites just to help things out around here.
So, can we purge most of these and condense them just to the Big Annoying Warning Box Of Doubt at the top of the article? Barring that, can someone point me to a Firefox plugin that strips all Wiki articles of [citation requested]?
:( :( :(  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.83.41 (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Many Cite Requests 

message: Had never heard of the Mormon's Kolob, the planet they think God is on or near, but the name and sense is similar... Is it just a coincidence, or might this reference have been in the BG creators' minds? Garth M (talk) 23:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the name a reference to the Mormons' "Kolob"?
Talk:Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada

message: deleting paragraph about "net revenue" here because it's potentially misleading. Specifically, "chapter development" and possibly "government relations" would be counted as overhead rather than program areas in many discussions of charitable spending. Text was:
"Eighty-three percent of MS Society net revenue is devoted to program areas:  MS research, services for people with MS and their families, MS clinics, government relations and social action, public education, and chapter development. Administration and fundraising costs are just 17 percent." Vicki Rosenzweig 19:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ohel Jakob synagogue (Munich)

message: This 2006 article was cited with this URL, a page which has apparently since been removed by Forbes.com.  I've replaced the link with this one, containing the contents of the original.  If that's removed, the following is the beginning of the article as it first appeared:
:Jews Celebrate New Munich Synagogue
::November 10, 2006
:Sixty-eight years after Hitler declared Munich's main synagogue an "eyesore" and ordered it torn down, Jews are celebrating a return to the heart of the city. Yesterday, the anniversary of Kristallnacht, or Night of Broken Glass, the mob attacks on Jews in Germany in November 1938, Torah scrolls were marched with fanfare through the winding streets of downtown Munich to a newly built synagogue. The Ohel Jakob synagogue, which seats 550, was then opened in a ceremony attended by President Horst Köhler.
If anyone has axs to that particular issue of Forbes, it'd be nice to know the contents of the rest of the text—esp. since this article is using that article as a reference regarding the funding of the synagogue.  Tomertalk 05:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 Forbes article
Talk:Transpersonal psychiatry

message: Many apologies, readers, but I have just seen the wiki-link I put to  John Rowan takes us to wrong man. I know that there is a Wikipedia article on the psychologist of that name - does any one know how to get the wiki-link to the right man? Many thanks. ACEO 19:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Many

message: There is now sufficient literature to establish a separate article on Transpersonal psychiatry; defined as early as 1993 by Walsh and Vaughan and  considered to be one of several Transpersonal disciplines (Walsh, 1993); later elaborated upon in the Textbook of Transpersonal psychiatry and psychology (1996); and even later; a special topic of Psychiatric Annals Vol. 29 (1999), and included in the American Psychiatric Association Course Guide in the 2000s. In the beginning Transpersonal psychiatry was closely associated with Transpersonal psychology, but the clinical work and perspective has now, in my view, established itself as a separate stream and is therefore more difficult to place within the concept of psychology. Recent developments have also brought the perspective of Transpersonal psychiatry in closer contact with the operations of the American Psychiatric Association. --Hawol (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: What clinical work? You have identified only advocates who think that this is a thing, but no independent notice of the claimed subfield. I see no indication that transpersonal psychiatry has separated itself from transpersonal psychology. Therefore I have instated a redirect to transpersonal psychology. jps (talk) 18:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Considerations for establishing this article as a topic separate from Transpersonal psychology