Talk:Culture in Luton

message: Here are the links you can use to write the article:
Nightlife
I know what your thinking, but there is stuff on the net.
* luton on the web
* List of places in luton
OK, there ain't a lot, but mention that it is beginning to pick up, that students are coming in, new life to the town in power court etc, i'm sure you'll know what to say
Sport
Football
* official site
cricket
* there isn't much. just mention it and say where it is. link to monty panesar if needed
Rugby
* Homesite
Other
*Graham Earl - there is so much on the net. take your pick, just make sure he is mentioned
Festivals
Luton Carnival
*Homepage
*council page
St. Patricks Day
*3 counties
Parks
Wardown Park
*Council site
Stockwood
*Council site
Both - (shout Luton)
Woodland
Bramingham
* birding site
Other
* Council site - good info
* adobe document - beds wildlife
Museums
*Both - (Council)
Other
I'm sure you've got some ideas for other things about culture in luton. add them here.
Theatre
* library - council
Art
* In wardown museum/stockwood and Luton hoo
Luton hoo
* travel site
* Homesite
This is just to start you off. have a look around, add more stuff like cinema or whatever. give the article some depth. I'm sure you will do fine.
Random articles 15:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: I propose that this article be merged with the main article for Luton as most of the information is duplicated anyway —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fanboy1966 (talk • contribs).
I would leave this a bit longer, as its clearly a work in progress and should be given time. The expanded article would be able to cut down items in the main Luton article, and be a daughter page.--172.203.163.204 19:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Don't remove the page's deletion tag without discussing it here. The whole idea of Wikipedia is collaboration.Rob 12:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As per Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion#Contesting a proposed deletion, I stated the reason in the edit summary when I removed the prod tag. The WP:PROD process isn't really about discussion, it's for uncontroversial deletions - hence if there's a discussion to be had, the tag should be removed. To discuss the potential removal of a page the WP:AFD process should be used instead.  Paulbrock 22:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete Page

message: :Image:EH icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:EH icon.png