lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:American Iron and Steel Institute

message: The x-ref for aisi grades seems to be misleading as the link is incomplete:  That page only has a bit about  ranges of numbers (not really readily found in its text) but nothing on, e.g., W1A or D2.Kdammers 02:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I started cleaning as much of this as I could, but it still needs work. I am surprised to see someone removing the advert tag when there were still links to the AISI store (among a lot of promotional flack-age which I tried to excise). Maybe it was NPOV? Maybe Advert? Maybe U.S.-centric? I think it's all of those, actually; I went with the wiki template in hopes that it will get some more attention. As I say, still needs work. B.S. Lawrence (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't decide if it's advert or wikify, but it's something! 

message: For a history class I am taking in school I was tasked with making changes to, and updating the AISI Wikipedia page which I have never done before. I added to the history, added environmental issues, updated the list of medal winners, and updated and resourced the consortia section. I was thrown off a little when the whole page that I had been editing had been totally overhauled right before I made my changes but I think i was still able to make some positive changes.Dendoc01 (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project update
Talk:Meridian, Mississippi

message: I just updated the article for the new mayor, Cheri M. Barry. There was some information in the "Government" section about John Robert Smith, the former mayor, so I commented it out. This information is reliably sourced and notable (I guess?), so I don't think it should be removed from Wikipedia, but where should it go? There isn't enough information about him to start his own article, but he's no longer the mayor of this city! Haha anyone have any ideas? The commented out information is below:
:The current mayor, John Robert Smith (R), has been in office since 1993 and has been recognized as an arts leader throughout the city and state, working on projects such as the restoration of Meridian's Grand Opera House, the future Mississippi Arts & Entertainment Center, upkeep and improvement of Bonita Lakes Park, the building of Bonita Lakes Mall, and development and construction of the Union Station multi-modal transportation center. (This link is dead now; the city has removed Smith's info and will soon replace it with Barry's.) He is also co-chairman of the National Forum on the Future of Passenger Rail, a member of Amtrak's board of directors, and a member of the transportation committees of the National League of Cities and the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This page has now been updated with Barry's biography (or at least some of it), but I don't really find any of it noteworthy. It sounds more like a college application than a list of accomplishments. Still no one has any ideas about what to do with JRS's info? --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 06:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Given his length of time in office, perhaps you could use Smith's accomplishments as a way of discussing new city directions during that time: emphasis on redevelopment, including Union Station as multi-modal center, intergovernmental and private collaboration, renovation of parks and infrastructure, encouraging redevelopment of historic buildings, etc. His membership on groups also tells you what directions city leaders in many areas were taking for redevelopment after the suburbs had drawn off businesses from downtowns. He looked outward to get ideas and build support.Parkwells (talk) 15:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Robert Smith
Talk:Reserve Bank of Fiji Building

message: Both the articles (Reserve Bank of Fiji and this one) are too short. Also, a person viewing Reserve Bank of Fiji would expect to find information about the building there. utcursch | talk 08:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, in light of the no consensus in the previous discussion, I realize that a merge would be in order. Radagast83 19:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

text: * Seems like a good idea to me. -- JJay 19:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

text: *Agree. Both could use the added information. (As the VfD nominator, I think this is a good solution.  Thanks to those that added more information to Reserve Bank of Fiji Building.)-- Scientizzle 18:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the articles
Talk:Sangemarmar Sar

message: I just copyedited the existing intro paragraph (adding the two alternate names, both of which seem to more common in the climbing literature, I don't know about local usage). But the explicit description of the Batura Muztagh probably doesn't need to be there, since it is more relevant to that article and is much the same as found there. So I would recommend taking it out, but I'll leave it there for now. -- Spireguy 02:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just moved the following from the article to here:
:This mountain was named in 1964 by the First Canadian Himalayan Expedition. Due to bad weather and government bureaucracy the team failed to make the summit, coming within 1000' of its peak. The team (consisting of Hans Gmoser, Gunti Prinz, Donald Lyon, Fred Roots,....) also named the nearby summit of Hachindar Chich although no attempt was made.
:The First Canadian Himalayan Expedition 1964
as told by Don Lyon; expedition team member 1964 to Peter Lyon
The given reference has no mention of Sangemarmar Sar, the names of the team members (besides Roots), or almost anything else mentioned in the above paragraph. So this information is still not backed up by a verifiable source. (I gather that some of the above was based on a personal communication...that's not verifiable, sorry.)  Presumably the 1966 CAJ mentioned in the above reference would be a much better source. If I have time I can check the 1966 AAJ. -- Spireguy (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian expedition info
Talk:Shidax

message: Good work on updating this. I had no idea it more than just karaoke! 218.219.13.98 02:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just karaoke 

message: I just added this information, but I'm not sure if this true of all Shidax karaoke places. If someone could verify either way that would be a help. Barryvalder 02:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SHIDAX Please! 
Talk:List of X-Files informants

message: From Shadow Man - "He was played by Millennium series regular Terry O'Quinn, and it should be noted that Terry O'Quinn also plays Darius Michaud  in the 1998 X Files film. In the film, Darius sacrifices himself in an explosion planted by the Syndicate to cover up the death of two fire fighters and a boy, all of whom were infected with the black oil. One can surmise that Darius and the Shadow Man super soldier are one and the same.  therefore Darius easily survived the point black explosion that brought down the building. He assumes a new (and for the most part anonymous) alias, one which Scully may not have realized was the once Darius because of the time laps, or shadowy appearance of the figure. However, it may also just be the over casting of Terry O'Quinn since he plays a third roll in a separate X file episode that is disconnected from the colonization mythos, three years before the movie, in the Aubrey episode in 1995.". Is this original research? SetaLyas (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?
Talk:Umpteen

message: This word is in the dictionary and is used in the way defined - is it still considered slang? - 64.93.237.116 01:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite correct, umpteen is not slang. I have fixed it to have a definition closer to what the author probably intended. Metsfanmax 21:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang? 

message: *Support merge The other page envelops everything this page reports. — ScouterSig 16:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Despite my earlier vote, I have change my mind. I created Indefinite and fictitious numbers (note the missing word "large"), which points to Umpteen and to Indefinite and fictitious large numbers, which I will propose renaming "zillion". Any thoughts? - DavidWBrooks 16:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After much confusion - including a merge vote that went nowhere until it was done backwards, I've moved this to Indefinite and fictitious numbers, along with all the -illion words - putting them all in one spot. We'll see how long that lasts. - DavidWBrooks 02:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not merge, after all
Talk:Wonder Girl (Cassie Sandsmark)

message: Is she actually Zeus' daughter - a demigoddess? Did she always know this? Why did she help Wonder Woman? To me, a non-reader, I can't make sense of it.~ZytheTalk to me! 18:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Cassie is a demi-goddess but she only found this out shortly before the One Year Later period. Zeus and her mother kept her parentage secret for most of her life. Artemisboy 19:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article makes no sense to me 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Djabugay language

message: It is noted that some/much of the language material relied upon in compiling this language article should properly be considered the intellectual and cultural property of those Djabugay people's who first gave the material to be documented and recorded.
It is also recognised and noted that within local Aboriginal economies of knowledge great store is placed on the act of performing or presenting knowledge, and it is in fact by performing or presenting knowledge (or some version of it), that the ownership of the knowledge is established. The more frequently and effectively particular words, stories, or songs are performed, the more they become stamped and owned by the performer, plus, the more the performances may 'purchase' obligatory relationships against which claims to real world benefits can be drawn/anticipated.
Recognising and acknowledging the above, it is not intented to rob  original performers, tellers, language speakers of their 'ownership' of those names, words, or knowledge that may be used in this article. 
Any use made of the names, words etc in this article can not be considered a genuine, authentic, authorised use, and should, rather, be regarded a caricature of the original, promotional in nature, leading readers towards the actual, authentic knowledge holders, potentially increasing the value of their intellectual and cultural property.
Bruceanthro (talk) 14:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Intellectual Property Statement

message: Per MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS section headings should not contain references.  This article has a couple to be cleaned up. RJFJR (talk) 03:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been taken care of.  Thank you. RJFJR (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo: headings with citations
Talk:George Willison Adams

message: I (re)added an  tag to this article.  I can't find anywhere that says he was actually a member of the Ohio Assembly and that would have been the most obvious sign of importance.  PoliticalGraveyard, although it's not the epitome of reliability, seems to have Ohio state politics covered pretty well - and George Willison Adams' name is nowhere to be found.  As for other sources, they seem to disagree on when he may have been a member of the assembly - one source hints at 1831, another says 1839.  Otherwise, as far as I can tell, his notability stems only from Prospect Place which already has a separate article.  Anyone have an opinion on a merge of some sort? —Wknight94 (talk) 03:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance?  Accuracy?
Talk:List of light novels

message: If we have a light novels category, do we need a list of light novels? They seem to accomplish the same thing... Doceirias 00:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I say that the category and list accomplish two different functions (in theory at least).  The category is for articles related to light novels, this could potentially include prominent authors, illustrators, or publishing companies.  The list on the other hand is a condensed format to list just the light novels themselves.  An advantage of lists over categories is that additional notes can be added along side the titles in a list.  This is not possible in a category. 63.161.86.254 (talk) 15:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant? 

message: Are the Higurashi novels really being released in English? Is there a source? --82.6.76.97 (talk) 23:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Katsushi Ōta said that he and Del Rey are planning to bring the Kodansha Box publishing line, which includes the Higurashi novels, to America. It's rather tenuous though, with that interview on his wiki page being the only source I can find. -Seventh Holy Scripture (talk) 00:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Higurashi 

message: Is Zettai Shounen really licensed and released in English? I didn't find anything. Is there a source? Senfgurke2 (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolute Boy 

message: Is there some distinction between the titles that are bolded and those that aren't? 205.175.158.96 (talk) 16:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Format 

message: Can I add LNs which were written by French or German authors (in French or German language)? 87.174.54.195 (talk) 09:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is with LNs which are not written ein English or Japanese?
Talk:Let Freedom Ring

message: Is "Melanie" really the same as "Little Melonae"?  I don't have Matador but know the Zorn recording on More News for Lulu and IIRC it's a different tune (attributed to Dorham).  I guess I'll go check now..... ND 03:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's the point, the point is that its dedicated to the same person (namely, Melonae) --Knucmo2 09:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not "Little Melonae" that was later recorded as "Melanie", but "Melody for Melanae". --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 17:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK--I think I found the syntax of the original sentence a little puzzling. ND 02:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mike Smith (broadcaster)

message: During BBC News 24's coverage of the Atherstone on stour warehouse fire, they talked to the helicopter pilot (which is something I've never heard the BBC do before), and introduced him as Mike Smith. I recognized the voice immediately.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjmunro (talk • contribs) 12:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  News 24 helicopter 
Talk:Bloodbath at the House of Death

message: I removed the claims that the film was not given a UK theatrical release and never released in the USA, as these claims do not seem to be correct.  See the notes on the distribution of the film at .--Ianmacm 20:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Direct to video release

message: A couple of new images have hopefully livened up the article.  For fans of the film pining for a DVD release, there is a chance to view the original theatrical trailer on YouTube. --♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 14:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of images
Talk:Eddie and the Cruisers

message: They said the Raritan bridge in the film  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.64.110.170 (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Didn't Eddie drive off of the Victory Bridge?
68.45.167.86 02:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Victory Bridge?

message: Removed unsourced section and placed it here until these points can be cited and integrated into other  sections of the article.--J.D. (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: This article has one of the very worst plot sections I have ever seen in Wikipedia --as it does not even say what the film is about--not even a teaser, just promotional ad copy--, & the cast section is just as bad.     DGG ( talk ) 20:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: inadequacies in the articles

message: Article states this was adapted from a Novel by P.F. Kluge. Is the novel worthy of an Wiki Article? Wfoj3 (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel
Category talk:Protection templates

message: See the Cfd
page for my proposal to merge the more specific "article header templates" category into this new category. -- Omniplex 03:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cfm 

message: Should :Category:Protected be removed, or is this category supposed to be protected, but isn't? --–Xoid 09:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean this is a sub-category of :Category:Protected, and should therefore either be a protected category, or contain protection templates which have been protected. I was thinking the latter just the other day. This is the only sub-category of :Category:Protected whose contents aren't (necessarily) protected. However, there does not appear to be a better parent category for it at this time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Confusing, isn't it? I personally think that the category should just be removed; this category is about templates to be used on protected pages, not about protected protection templates. That is, however, only my best guess. –Xoid 07:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree. This category is already a sub-category of :Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates, and though it should be heavily linked from the protected pages categories, it doesn't really belong there. I suppose there should probably be a :Category:Wikipedia protection for things like this. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected?

message: It may be safe to create a template for << full protection >> against every single violation charted on the table.
*Sock puppets --- There are short-term "sock puppets", and long term ones that can be considered light "time bombs" (although it doesn't make sense to actually say "time bomb" on a Wikipedia template). It is possible for somebody to remain a user on Wikipedia for a week or more just to become one.
*Spambots --- Somebody could be creating multiple user accounts in one house and not just on one computer (Not the same IP address). They could connect to their own network and "eat away" at Wikipedia.
There should also be a << full protection >> and an << indefinite protection >> template for articles that are being considered for deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.181.164 (talk) 01:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra templates. 

message: Following instructions, I added  as the protection reason at Barnyard Bash, but the template doesn't render on the page. Am I doing something wrong? --ZimZalaBim talk 23:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:pp-create]]
Talk:Whaling in the Faroe Islands

message: I have just completed a thorough review of this article in an effort spanning about a week. The sources have now been thoroughly vetted for link rot, dead links, duplication, incorrect formatting and missing titles. Questions about quality and neutrality may remain, but all of the links at least now lead where they are supposed to. I have also restructured the page, removed sections of duplicated material and addressed the essay-like nature of large portions of the content that were written up without any appropriate sourcing or citation. The tags pertaining to these issues have been duly removed. There is still a lot of work to be done, not least in filling the many holes in the article where citation is still either sparse or lacking. The neutrality of many of the sources may also be questionable, and I have reserved judgement on whether the article in general is neutral and left the disputed neutrality tag in place. Input from others welcome. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Thorough review - September 2021

message: Hi @Chiswick Chap: I recently encountered this thread at the village pump with various individuals bemoaning the lack of variety at TFA, which got me thinking: might it be worth trying to take this article to the next level? I then checked the criteria and realised that, thoroughness aside, the criteria are not so very different and might be attainable. But I thought I might ping you for your thoughts first, since you know the content, look familiar with the FA process, and might be able to give me some hints about any MOS bloopers that may currently exist. I would be grateful for your thoughts. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Worth a shot at FA?
Talk:Malpighian tubule system

message: some more mention of malpighians in arthropods other than insects (Crustacea, Chelicerata)appreciated
Goldfinger820 03:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, I don't think any other phyla besides the insects and myriapods possess malpighian tubules... In fact I'm going to change that in the article; please correct me if I'm wrong. IronChris  |  (talk) 03:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Arachnida definitely do, but not sure about crustacean orders - hopefully someone in this area can help out (i have a feeling they dont though...)  Goldfinger820 05:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: mmmh I read somewhere that the organs in spiders and not homologous but rather some kind of convergent evolution... It's incredible how difficult it is to get clear information about malpighian tubules! I'll try to ask my Master's supervisor this afternoon. IronChris  |  (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok at last some information on the subject. I added what I found out. It would need a citation though, I'll try and browse some journals to find an article. You want to know something funny? I had an exam in a course called "invertebrate diversity" today, actually my last undergraduate exam, and one of the questions was "define Malpighian tubules"! Well, that wasn't too difficult! Take care, IronChris  |  (talk) 03:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: haha - the greatness of Wikipedia  hope you did well  Goldfinger820 05:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article presently states:
: The wastes then are released from the organism in the form of solid nitrogenous compounds as calcium oxalate.
I'm no chemist, but the page for calcium oxalate gives a chemical formula of CaC2O4, which clearly lacks any N.
How can a compound that has no nitrogen be nitrogenous?
‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waste products
Talk:Canonical analysis

message: The article does not describe the method well. The references are unfortunately useless, as they require journal subscription. The maximization at the end of the simple description gives the only hint of what is going on, but even there it is not clear if XU is features x features size matrix (probably, yes)? Some "see also" links, or some relevant reference available online would be helpful. Tomash (talk) 18:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still confused