Talk:San Francisco Chronicle

message: Having been in the 1994 strike, it would be nice to expand upon that, versus the brief mention. GXIndiana (talk) 22:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Labor?

message: NPOV means we include any published criticism, much like we have for other media outlets. We just don't judge whether the criticism is accurate or not. The Bay Guardian criticism is in a legitimate, published, verifiable source, and as such is readded. Calwatch 20:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not violate WP:CIVIL, and avoid making personal attacks (least bit intellectually honest). I've decided to add a blurb about conservative criticism. I hope this works. Calwatch 00:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to say that the section doesn't improve the article. For example, no clear evidence is given for the Communist Party assertion, and it's a convoluted argument anyway. I think we should cut both the leftist and rightist criticism down to the basics of their beliefs, since I doubt either of these viewpoints is widely held. - mako 07:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bay Guardian" editorial in disguise

message: Could someone create an article for the famous author for the Chronicle named Joan Ryan? Thanks! Jccort (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While I don't know if the term "famous author" would cut it with Wiki, nevertheless, if Paul Avery and Charles McCabe get separate articles, I guess Ryan should too.  One of us should get to work on it--while the Chron still exists :(  Lantana11 (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for article

message: The main article says: "today only the Los Angeles Times exceeds the Chronicle's circulation on the West Coast, while the paper is ranked 12th by circulation nationally." But a quick look at "The Oregonian" newspaper in Portland (on Wikipedia) shows a circulation that is greater than the Chronicle. This needs to be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattquist (talk • contribs) 06:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Circulation is not accurate

message: Does the paper have an actual or apparent policy on outing?  The title of the piece that outed Judge Vaughn R. Walker was "Judge being gay a nonissue during Prop. 8 trial". Of course if the San Francisco Chronicle staff really thought it was a 'nonissue', it wouldn't have been thusly titled, and wouldn't have been published. This was the height of disingenuity by the Chron itself, which decided to run it after "great debate" involving Matier and Ross and "the paper's editor and publisher". --98.248.113.11 (talk) 23:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outing policy? 

message: A fairly large paragraph has been recently written because the Chron is changing out it's weekly TV section. In my opinion this  change in their TV guide is has no merit whatsoever for inclusion in this article, and if we need it the info could be done in a sentence. But considering the long storied history of the Chron, with all of the changes made to its content and format over the years, this long paragraph about such a trivial change is pointless. --Fizbin (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Guide 

message: I see mention that the online archives on their main website only go back as far as 1995. And then the "San Francisco Chronicle Historical" on the San Francisco Public Library website covers from 1865 to 1922. How does one find the newspaper archives from 1923 to 1994? PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question, for the sake of anyone else looking: The San Francisco Public Library's Historical Digital Newspaper Collections in the section called "California Historical Newspapers (NewsBank)" has the San Francisco Chronicle archives from 1865 to 2017; as well as many others. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 01:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the archives for the San Francisco Chronicle, 1923 to 1994?