lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boy Bitten by a Lizard

message: Discussion of what the painting means seems to be completely conjecture with nothing to support it.  Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 21:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You've added the wrong tag - what you're actually wanting to say is that the article lacks citations. Without citations from reliable sources it could indeed be personal conjecture. However, the interpretations given are mainstream ones from scholars of art history - Longhi is noted as a reference, but Gash was also used, and I believe others. You're right, nevertheless, about the leck of cites - perhaps you'd like to read some of the major Caravaggio studies and add them? (I'm serious about this - the books are available in any large library). PiCo (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no art expert.  And I do think the POV tag is correct, since all we have here is uncited opinion.  Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 19:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Not a POV dispute - changed to correct tag. Enki H. (talk) 12:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This is also personal opinion and conjecture

message: There seems to have been some confusion in the past as to which version was illustrated.  We now have both versions.--Alan (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two versions

message: Anybody want to give us a translation of the Latin? My little Collins Latin dictionary doesn't even have some of the words--e.g., I had to get "insidiose" by checking the etymology of insidious in my American Heritage Dictionary!
My partial, doubtless inaccurate stab, whose appearance I hope will goad someone into putting right: "Have mercy, lizard, creeping around, lying in wait for a boy; let go of that tempting finger you've grabbed!" GeorgeTSLC (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martial: "Ad te reptani, puer insidiose, lacertae parce: cupit digitis illa perire tuis." 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Caravaggio - Boy Bitten by a Lizard.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 11, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-05-11. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Caravaggio - Boy Bitten by a Lizard.jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:Anthroposophic medicine

message: Anthroposophical medicine is essentially based upon the hallucinations (mystical delirium) of a "clairvoyant". tgeorgescu (talk)  10:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So what? All the medical systems in the world are in a large part based on myths and unfounded beliefs passed through generations. That's why we see this ongoing effort to promote the use of Evidence-based medicine, something that isn't at all obvious for healthcare professionals nor so widely practiced as lay people might imagine. So-called anthroposophic medicine is no different: it has its uses, it has its supporters, and it has very little evidence in support. — kashmīrī TALK 11:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly have no idea what "uses" Anthroposophic medicine has been shown to have. We shouldn't give it Undue legitimacy when our best sources don't. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 13:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anthroposophical MDs learn mainstream medicine, but AFAIK they learn it in order to dodge it as far as it is allowable. tgeorgescu (talk)  14:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Useful for quacks to make money from their victims. Bon courage (talk) 14:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your message. However, I do not get your point. I was adding the fact, that benchmarks of the WHO have been published about training in Anthroposophic Medicine. Werthp (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHO-approved training
Talk:The Burial of Saint Lucy

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 09:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Canigiani Holy Family

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 09:14, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Cardsharps

message: This almost the definition of original research, but the man in the picture does resemble the artist himself doesn't he? Joepnl (talk) 00:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, any European with dark hair and a goatee, between the ages of about 20 and 40, must clearly be Caravaggio himself. LOL. (I actually think you're probably right, but absent scholarly analysis coming to this conclusion, it's not a theory we can advance. I would be fairly surprised if some reliable sources haven't already published this conclusion, but my art books pile doesn't have any on Caravaggio. Maybe someone at major university or an art school can check the library there.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not him, unless he was alright with portraying himself as a cheat. Maybe he had that kind of sense of humor. The image doesn't resemble the image below this note and to the left (where his eyebrows would be the pride of any anticipated raccoon). Randy Kryn (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the man Caravaggio himself? 
Talk:Cecco del Caravaggio

message: A further painting credited to Cecco del Caravaggio is 'A Musician (Conjurer)', which is on display at Apsley House http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/a-musician-conjurer John a s (talk) 23:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Musician (Conjurer)
Talk:Cerasi Chapel

message: This should be the **Cesari** Chapel, not the Cerasi Chapel! Honest! It's named after Cesari, who was an important painter before Caravaggio. Ricky (talk) 23:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, but the authors of the works in the Bibliography all think it's the Cerasi Chapel.  When I was there, most recently in 1996, it was the Cerasi Chapel. Vicedomino (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The chapel was named after Tiberio Cerasi: so what? --Marco Ciaramella (talk) 21:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name!
Talk:Colin Bell (footballer, born 1946)

message: I know nothing about football, neither of horse racing, but I'm fully convinced that the nickname Nijinsky came from the world famous balley dancer Vaslav Nijinsky, as did the name of the (hardly outside the racing circles known) horse! I also would imagine that a skilled football player more easily could be compared to a balley dancer than to a race horse. Vaslav Nijinsky has been dead for sixty yeras, but still people prise their offspring with "oh, you're a real Nijinsky!" when they do some good dancing steps. -Islander(Scandinavia) (talk) 11:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some footballers maybe; and yes the horse was named after the ballet dancer; but Colin Bell was named after the horse. The going was heavy on 1970s football pitches. (Chorleypie (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race horse?! 
Talk:Christ Falling on the Way to Calvary

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   — CactusWriter | needles 04:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I corrected the Italian spelling from "Il Spasimo" (which is incorrect) to "Lo Spasimo" (grammatically correct and thus spelled later on in the very text). I'll create a redirection to facilitate search, since a redirect was originally created for the wrong spelling.
:I have now translated from it:Wiki and added refs and links. --Smintheus Fellin (talk) 15:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian spelling and text expansion
Talk:Codex Leicester

message: Do we know where the codex will be exhibited next? Is there a website with this ino? Thanks! 213.47.144.254 (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location / exhibition 

message: Wikipedia deserves it. There are countries, where reprints/scans, are treated in the same way as originals - if there is no right for it it should be published for free.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.75.70.254 (talk) 01:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is original text of Codex?
Talk:Contarelli Chapel

message: Because the article is about the chapel, maybe more information is needed about the history of the building? The article is currently quite one-sided. Sionk (talk) 23:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

message: Hello, I have removed the tags from the top of the page, as I'm in the process of cleaning up the prose, which is mostly written in a personal, essayistic voice. I will be adding academic references if I can dig some out. I believe the tone is approaching encyclopaedic now. Let me know if anyone has any more suggestions to improve the page, or if I might be missing something..Thanks TerentiusNew (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 2020
Talk:Cristofano Allori

message: The version of Judith in Florence is much, much better in my opinion. I think we should reinstate it.Brianbleakley (talk) 01:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't actually agree, plus it is a later version, and the pic we had was of appalling quality. A better one might work. Johnbod (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which painting to show? 
Talk:Televisión de Galicia

message: No offense, but Galicia is not a country.  It should say Spain. --Nricardo (talk) 06:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country in infobox 

message: Private channels are surely also subject to the law. Maybe the author means that TVG's existence, status and practice are defined in law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 16:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: As a public channel, TVG is subject to Galician law.
Talk:Canal Sur

message: Umm, we have a problem.  There is also an American company called Canal Sur that owns pay-TV channels in the US that screen mainly Latin American programming.  The website is here. --70.109.208.155 (talk) 02:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Czartoryski Museum

message: Piotrus, these sources seem to perpetrate some urban legends or shall we say nationalist mythology. 258 most active rebels were indeed sentenced to death, but the capital punishment was instantly commuted to "exile abroad". I don't know whether Czartoryski was one of those rebels, but it seems clear that there was no danger to his life in the Russian Empire. --Ghirla-трёп- 13:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ghirla, I don't know what the Russian article states, but we have plenty of sources that Czartoryski was sentenced to death:
* Czartoryski Museum: "He was condemned to death by the Russians after the 1830 insurrection and forced to flee across Europe"
* Historical Dictionary of Poland, 966-1945: "After the fall of Insurrection, sentenced to death by Russians, he went into Exile."
* Encyclopedia of Russian History: "However, the Russians crushed the rebellion, and Czartoryski was sentenced to death."
It's quite possible that the sentence was later convinced to exile, but the sources imply that he left the country fleeing for his life and couldn't return later one way or another. I see nothing dubious in the current fragment. If your source states that the death penalty was changed later to exile, just add it to the article - I don't see why this would be problematic. But you yourself admit that he was at first sentenced to death, so what's dubious? PS. Anyway, since this is an article about a museum, not the prince, we can settle on some compromise wording here and move all the details about death sentence, exile and emmigration to his bio, perhaps?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I hope my changes are acceptable. Is the above text a translation of your source? Could you provide full reference details - I'd like to change them from elinks into footnotes, but as you know, unfortunatly I cannot read Russian.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Russian Foreign Minister Sentenced to Death by the Tsar? 

message: "...although the Leonardo and other pictures were roughly handled, they were not damaged" - I'd say, they were. "The Lady with an ermine" has been quite severely damaged, as the left upper corner has been broken. Only because it didn't break in half (or something equally dramatic) it doesn't mean, that the picture was not damaged at all. DameMitHermelin (talk) 01:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damage of the paintings by Nazi soldiers in 1939
Talk:Daniele Crespi

message: Short article concerning a not especially noteworthy painting would easily fit here. Manannan67 (talk) 03:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it contains enough for a good stub. Standard visual arts page, and quite a nice painting. Randy Kryn (talk) 07:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection with no support and stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Daniele da Volterra

message: "He is best remembered for his association with the late Michelangelo. '  This sounds like a reference to a recent death. Should it be M's later period? Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 15:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late Michaelangelo
Talk:David with the Head of Goliath (Caravaggio, Rome)

message: The main article on Caravaggio states that the term "to lay with" was, during Caravaggio's time, an expression that simply meant "to live with". However, this entry makes it out to be a wholly sexual statement.  Perhaps one of the entries should be edited so that there may be some consistency. Moreover the notion that this painting "inescapab[ly]" conveys a sexual relation between the artist and the model is an overstretch, particularly when one considers that the most recent scholarship on Caravaggio disputes the notion he was a homosexual. 74.138.43.60 (talk) 02:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The boy
Talk:The Deposition (Raphael)

message: This image really isn't up to scratch; it's all pixelated in places. I would fix it... but I don't know anything about the process of uploading images, let alone the paintings of Raphael. So I'll just whine impotently in the talk page, in the hope some person cleverer than I will take notice.... Sheavsey33 (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As is often the case, there was a much better version already on Commons. Johnbod (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Disputation of the Holy Sacrament

message: The article lists the two popes to the right of the altar as Julius II and Sixtus IV. However, Volpato's etching naming the persons depicted lists them as, left to right, Innocent III and Anacletus (third Pope, aka Cletus). Volpato also lists Duns Scotus and Bonaventure to the right of the altar, who are not mentioned in the article. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/P_1869-0410-2127 1Mamalujo (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct names of the two pontiffs to the right of the altar
Talk:Domenico di Bartolo

message: Domenico di Bartolo (Ghezzi) is an unintentional  redundant fork of this article and should be merged here. Pinging User:HannahPark0709.  Mduvekot (talk) 21:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not that unintentional but one must assume good faith - yes merge.PRehse (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Domenico di Bartolo (Ghezzi) with Domenico di Bartolo
Talk:Colin Linden

message: Any Colin Linden fans care to update his page with him joining Bob Dylan's band? 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/edlis.cafe/permalink/567565226615347/
EdRicardo (talk) 11:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Domenico Puligo

message: Bibliography
Irenez2017 (talk) 15:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems like you have found some great sources. You have a strong start with your research, but need to add some structure and information to your article. It would be helpful if you created a lead section and then perhaps personal life, career/artistic significance, and lasting influence/significance. 
I copyedited a few minor grammatical things (it is often important with these sorts of articles to clarify pronouns so that there is no ambiguity), but did not make any major changes. 
It would be helpful if you could find more information on his relationships with other artists (which you touch on) and biographical history. It would also clarify the article if you added a bit about his style, use of materials, and artistic development. 
In general, your sources show a good start, and I look forward to reading a more developed article!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahhwolfe (talk • contribs) 23:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: Thank you Hannahhwolfe for your comments and suggestions, I really appreciate them and have taken them into consideration as I improve upon my article. 
I had been working on my article in my Sandbox but have now moved it on to the main page of the article. As you have suggested, I have included a lead section, a life section, and two other sections on his work. 
I have elaborated upon what is known about his relationships with other artists and also tentatively added information on his style and progression as an artist. I definitely agree that these aspects served to clarify the article more. 
Thank you also for making those small changes! Often small mistakes like that can be more recognizable by another set of eyes, I really appreciate it!
Irenez2017 (talk) 19:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to Peer Review
Talk:Domenichino

message: I've removed the following reference:
*
Wittkower's book, however valuable as a broad survey, is not, like the other references listed, an important contribution to Domenichino studies.  Moreover, either the citation to Wittkower should be to the first edition, 1958, or to the much-revised addition brought out by Yale U. Press in 1999, which updates Wittkower's notes and bibliography.  (Information courtesy of User:Respear.)   -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 23:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wittkower reference 
Talk:Doni Tondo

message: I just wanted to make people aware of some revisions that I will soon make to support the academic quality already displayed on this page.  The following is a list of changes that I propose:
*Reformatting- The reformatting that I propose would split the page up into seven different sections to hopefully create an easier flow and understanding on the page.  These sections would be "Description," "Technique," "Influences," "Plant Symbolism," and "Scholarly Theories," followed by notes and references.
*Additions- After each section is a description of additions I will make that are not already found on the page.  More citation will be added as well as more scholarly interpretation of the work.
Sections
*Description- One addition to this section is a description of the frame of the painting.
*Technique- This section will discuss his painterly style, including his novel use of color and pigment.
*Influences- A major addition to this section is the influences of the Laocoön and the similarities it shares with the Doni Tondo.
*Plant Symbolism- The lengthy discussion of the symbolism of the depicted plants has been given its own section.
*Scholarly Theories- This section incorporates the interpretations into a single section.  It gives the summaries of four major theories by the scholars Paul Barolsky, Mirella D'Ancona, Andrée Hayum, and Roberta Olsen.
--Millsaps11 (talk) 22:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Revisions