lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Province of Quebec (1763–1791)

message: I hate having to type in the whole damn title of this thing everytime I want to get here and edit this page.  Why do we need the date range anyway?  Can we please rename this to Quebec (colony)?!?! Kevlar67 01:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made that a redirect, but I think the title its currently at is more correct. (in my uninformed opinion) Bawolff 06:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This article needs a new map, one that shows Quebec as of 1763 and how it was expanded in 1774 and then reduced in 1783 by the Treaty of Paris (and also to show the relationship between the 1174 province and its successors: Lower Canada, Upper Canada, and the Northwest Territory) Kpgokeef (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: I think 'é' will be better than 'em. Iamgreat4eva (talk) 12:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit 

message: The map is inaccurate; it includes Nova Scotia among the "Thirteen Colonies", which of course it was not. Talk of the "Thirteen Colonies" from 1774 is anachronistic anyway; at that point, the Continental Congress included delegates from only twelve colonies (Georgia didn't send an official delegate until 1775).  Grover cleveland (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. Initially (pre-1776), Nova Scotia was labelled by some as “the 14th American Colony”, and there was ambivalence over whether the colony should join the more southern colonies in their defiance of Britain. This is reflected on the map as an “indefinite boundary” (kinda hard to see). After the war, Nova Scotia was firmly in British hands.-- BC  talk to me 00:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is inaccurate
Talk:Jerry Savelle

message: Please make this article not read like a press release.
WAVY 10 02:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: This article is a promotional piece, lacking information beyond what’s available in a few complementary sources. 
Bluepenciltime (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance and neutral POV  

message: A poster said that Jerry died of a stroke, but this has not been publicly announced.  I watched his Homegoing service online and a speaker at the service confirmed Jerry had a stroke in 2016 and also had open heart surgery a couple of years later.  But no cause of death was mentioned by anyone.  Hence why I changed the wording in the header of the article. Heidi bradshaw (talk) 04:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I also checked the source cited for his death; it did not mention a stroke. —C.Fred (talk) 17:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Alejandro Daniel Wolff

message: I created this page because I saw the redlink but I need a little help adding the references - the information is all there - if someone could come along and help it would be much appreciated.  Mrmaroon25 02:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, got it Mrmaroon25 02:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:In Case of Emergency (TV series)

message: It appears that the entire plot summary of this television series was taken from this page: http://abc.go.com/primetime/schedule/2006-07/incaseofemergency.html. Sincerely, Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 02:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've removed the copyright infringement tag. For now, I've given credit to the site where the summary was taken from. Sincerely, Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 20:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that even allowed? Byxbee 05:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Infringement?

message: The summary on this page is really bad. Why is it all in future tense. The stuff already happened and should be in past tense. 69.153.198.17 03:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Future Tense
Talk:Palace of Whitehall

message: The date of the 1698 fire is unclear. Palace of Whitehall is listed on January 4 and Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/January 4, but John Evelyn's diary entry is dated January 2, so the 4th would seem to be incorrect. Anyone have a source for this date? howcheng  {chat} 18:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One year later, I found my own answer. The originally cited source was in error; I've now cited Evelyn's diary directly. howcheng  {chat} 23:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of destruction 

message: Just FYI, the partial drawing you have listed in the article as a design by Wren for a new Whitehall is not drawn by Wren. It was made by Nicholas Hawksmoor, Wren's draughtsman at the time, under Wren's direction. See Anthony Geraghty's text on Wren's All Souls (Oxford) drawings for more details/references etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laidac (talk • contribs) 17:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wren's Design 
Talk:Don't Bring Me Down

message: Electronic group OP:L BASTARDS made a cover from this song (The Job).
Would it be interesting to mention it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.102.124.39 (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover by Op:l Bastards 

message: DBMD is sampled in at least two songs on Fatboy Slim's On the Floor at the Boutique album: "Apache" and "Because I Got It Like That".  A different sample is heavily used in Shonen Knife's opening self-titled track from their album 712. Asat (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does it get sampled? 

message: The reference citation in this article that supposedly verifies the claim that the chorus includes the word "Grooss" is circular. It simply links to another Wikipedia article about the songwriter, and in that article there is no mention of this lyric.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.191.10 (talk) 20:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How this is supposed to sound like "Grüß Gott" is beyond me anyway (I am a native German speaker). It does sound like "Gruß!" though, which is related and basically means "Greeting!" (singular). The vocals are very, very similar to "Gruß!" so I am changing the page to reflect that. Plmr (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misheard Lyric - Circular Reference 

message: It is often labeled as disco Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 07:45, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disco
Category talk:Museums by type

message: I've heard of a Montreal humor museum. Anybody know what it's called?  Trekphiler 02:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Funny, funny, funny

message: :Category:Types of museum is itself a category within :Category:Museums. — Robert Greer (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Museums]] ''vs.'' [[:Category:Types of museum]] 

message: "Type" refers to the form or techniques of the museum (open-air, virtual, eco-), whereas topic refers to the theme of the content (science, art, history, ethnography, etc.) --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 23:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Listing 'Museums by type' instead of 'Museums by topic' and leads to confusion with the category 'Types of Museums' The category title should be changed. Myotus (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that "Types of Museums" is for articles about types.  "Museums by types" is for articles about individual museums themselves. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 03:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose a split museums by type and museums by topic/subject
Talk:Mead hall

message: There is much more to say on this subject.  Some of this content should be researched and integrated into the article:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22mead+halls%22&rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GGIC
--Jeffrey Henning 02:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pholiota microspora

message: Nameko is not a 'plant' but a fungi. But I don't know how to edit the title of page.
Scigie 02:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Need species name. Badagnani (talk) 09:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Species
Talk:Tommy Godfrey

message: I've moved the comment below from the article page:
I can assure the edit to my grandads Wikipedia page that was deleted without foundation in June this year, was completely out of order and everything this person decided to delete is totally true! Why he/she feels they have the right to delete my post about my grandad is beyond me and my family? Perhaps they could contact me as my USL is visible , we could discuss this matter further. I’m offering you the chance to explain yourself please don’t waste it? IAN BOYCE (Tommy Godfrey’s grandson)    08:11, 8 August 2022‎ 82.42.199.152
:I'm sure it was all true.  However, the comment was removed because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a memorial, and personal information about relatives should not be included for privacy reasons.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2022
Talk:Non (DC Comics)

message: This article needs to be expanded a little bit & needs a picture of Non from both the comics & movies. Son of Kong
:The current article is lacking, but will most likely expand with the changes made to the character as of late. I have taken the liberty of adding the fact that he was a council member before his mind was altered. I believe that for the sake of accuracy and to better define the character his "fall from grace" ,as it were, should be better documented.Deepbluesky 23:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion?

message: Someone has written:  "It is interesting to note that his heat vision took a significant amount of time to develop, whereas Zod and Ursa had been able to easily use heat vision, suggesting that heat vision may be related to Kryptonian brain activity; since Non didn't think much, there was subsequently less mental energy for Non to use heat vision."
This really doesn't make much sense at all. Is it just someone's opinion that has been added to the page or is it from another reference? If it is from another reference could a citation please be added.
From what I've read of Superman & other Kryptonians their powers are the result of stored solar energy from a yellow sun, not based on "mental energy". It would seem a more plausible explanation that Non simply doesn't possess the required level of concentration to engage his heat vision as affectively as the others. Swampy 121.217.107.88 (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heat vision & mental energy. 

message: The article says that the film doesn't mention non's name at all, but we clearly hear Ursa say "he's caged non!" to Zod as superman replaces the spire on the empire state building...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.82.202 (talk) 04:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The "Powers and abilities" section has a few theories on Non and they are all presented as fact.  WTF?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.73.179 (talk) 06:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Most of this section has nothing to do with Non.  It is a bullshit retelling of Zod and his plan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.84.11 (talk) 00:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers and abilities WTF?
Talk:Sound-powered telephone

message: I haven't been able to find anything about phasing out sound powered telephones or a system called IVACS.  Can someone provide a reference?   Rex07 02:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would the Navy want to phase sound powered phones out?  What could you possibly replace them with that doesn't need any external power to operate?  JDZeff (talk) 07:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Phasing out?

message: Need a reference for 30mi range.  A brief web search shows ranges of around 4 miles. Rex07 03:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Range
File talk:All-High Stadium - The Natural.JPG

message: I LOOKED ALL OVER THE INTERNET TO TRY TO FIND A BETTER IMAGE. I CANNOT FIND ONE, AND I DO NOT INTEND TO DRIVE 1,000 MILES TO TAKE A PICTURE OF IT. THE CLAIM THAT IT SHOULD BE "EASILY REPLACEABLE" IS PATENTLY FALSE. Wahkeenah 02:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaceable is defined by Wikipedia as possible recreated. Since the stadium still exists, this is possible since the image is used solely to depict the stadium. It doesn't matter if a free image is currently available, whether you could find one on the internet or that you are 1000 miles from the subject: The possibility exists that a free image could be created, making this in violation of the Wikipedia fair use policy. --MECU≈talk 02:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image illustrates how it was used in the making of the film, which is not reproduceable elsewhere. I concur that the way the stadium looks now is reproduceable. But not the way it looked in the film... as discussed in the article. Wahkeenah 03:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. There is nothing in the article that suggest that the image was doctored for the movie. A current, free image could show the same things that this image shows and the fact that it's not similar to Wrigley field. Even the "refurbishment" that occurred in 2006 likely didn't change the stadiums base appearance substantially. --MECU≈talk 03:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try actually reading the article, and you might see this: "In fact, All-High Stadium has only a single level of stands with a roof. The upper deck in the film appears to have been inserted in post-production, and the scoreboard also matted in over an existing tall smokestack on a building that stands at the north corner of the stadium, presumably part of Bennett High's heating plant." Wahkeenah 00:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it might be useful then in The Natural then, but I don't think it's useful here because the picture doesn't illustrate much except what it looked like in the movie. The subject of this article isn't how the stadium looked in the movie. I think the text is sufficient as it perfectly describes what the changes were. A free image that showed a single level and the smokestack would be fine since one could compare it to an image of Wrigley field to see the difference between the two. It doesn't take a fair use image to illustrate that. --MECU≈talk 01:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, the image caption "All-High Stadium as seen in The Natural" isn't correct, since it's been digitally altered to not represent the stadium. --MECU≈talk 01:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the title to be more descriptive. I could include the Google maps overhead of the stadium the way it really looks, but Google maps are copyrighted. Wahkeenah 01:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be able to get a satellite view using the USGS viewer. I wrote a guide on how to use it at User:Mecu/USGSSeamlessViewer. --MECU≈talk 00:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried it and it locked up my computer. Wahkeenah 04:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Johnny Kingdom

message: (moved from article)
Also in a recent move, Johnny has also signed an exclusive deal to host a series of live shows at a grand country house near his home in Devon. Stooleigh Court, by all accounts could be the perfect location for these one off events, where the fans will really be able to get up close and personal with the man himself. If all rumours are to be held true, tickets for the events will go on sale in early March ( 07 ). After a little digging a website was discovered , and a phone number 01398 351556. This may not be something that you want to miss ! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tim Fellows (talk • contribs) 15:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future JK activities 
Talk:Homicide: Life on the Street season 2

message: I have changed the episode order to production order to better match the narrative flow. The first few seasons of Homicide had clear arcs that were broken up by NBC when they decided to air the episodes out of production order. Other networks have done this with other shows and Wikipedia has put the episode lists for those shows in production order, see  Batman: The Animated Series for an example. In addition this is the way that the episodes are ordered on the Homicide DVDs. If people are particularly interested in how NBC re-ordered the episodes, air dates are part of the description and if these changes are significant enough they're usually explained in the brief episode synopsis.Zero no Kamen (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Order 

message: Is it appropriate to list Wendy Hughes as a member of the regular cast?  She did not appear in the opening credits as a regular cast member in season 1, but did appear in the credits as a guest star.  Lee Tergesen (Officer Chris Thormann) appeared in just as many season 1 episodes; should he be listed as a regular cast member, too?  I plan on removing Wendy from the second paragraph unless there's overwhelming objection. See also Talk:Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1) Apr1fool (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wendy Hughes
Talk:I Dream of Mimi

message: I've done a major rewrite of this article.  The text that was once in the "Story" section looked to me like it had been pasted in from a review site, but I can't be certain.  In any case, it wasn't in the formal tone considered proper for an encyclopedia.  Any additions to the plot summary are welcome.  Also especially welcome are the remaining names of the Japanese cast. Robotman1974 03:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Is the OAVs the only episodes, or was their a normal series after that?--64.79.179.254 (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes
Talk:Glacis

message: I think that this article should remain together.  Each section is very short, and I don't think that they warrant having their own separate articles.  If more detail is added to them, then maybe splitting them up would be warranted, but not now.--Tabun1015 03:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Took the words right out of my mouth. I agree, that there's really no reason to split it into different sections until the two definitions have enough information to stand alone. Besides, they're highly related topics. Kevin 21:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose split

message: The article state:
*The glacis was originally designed to protect stone fortifications, as vertical walls could easily be smashed down by artillery fire. 
*The glacis deflected incoming cannonballs by providing a springy, sloping surface which the cannonballs bounced off, landing behind the fragile stone fortifications.
Does anyone have any reference to theese statements? They do not seem sound to me. Imo. the glacis is formed to give the attaker as little shelter as possible. If the defender's fire missed hiting the first line, it would hit in the the next, making the defenders fire as effective as possible.
As for bouncing cannonballs - most siege artillery at the time was mortars with a high trajectory. Imo if flat firing artillery was used, the granade would either dig into the glacis, hit the rampart or pass over it. KjellG (talk) 19:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Weren't mortars used to destroy the defenders themselves, rather than the walls, precisely because of the near impossibility of destroying a fortress' walls at this point in history? JWAbrams (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bouncing cannonballs? 

message: The description of the glacis plate on an AFV is incorrect, at least for UK use. The glacis plate is the sloping TOP (roof) section of the front of the hull deck. The backward-sloping plate below ( the lower) is the bow plate. Ian Dunster (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, but do not have any good reference. KjellG (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tank use incorrect

message: Sloping it has two powerful advantages: many projectiles will deflect rather than penetrate; those that attempt to will have to travel on a longer diagonal route through any given thickness of armor than if it were perpendicular to their trajectory.
I'm ok with the first. The second advantage however is almost entirely eaten by the added weight of sloped armor. Why is this not mentioned?--217.248.19.21 (talk) 23:22, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well, that's not entirely true, isn't it?
Talk:Irimi

message: As far as I know, irimi is an aikido term not used in other arts. I do wonder if we should have articles on every concept used in every art. Possibly we could merge it somewhere? 
I tried to discuss maai in context, but did not really manage. I am surprised that article does not exist; it is used in all kinds the budo arts and should really be defined somewhere, much more so than irimi and tenkan. // habj 23:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Jiu-jitsu we use 'irimi' as well. Irimi in Jiu-jitsu is when the attacker is obviously trying to attack you, but comes dangerously close, and you attack him instead so he can't suddenly attack you.VDZ 20:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this stub be merged somewhere?
Talk:Will Smith (defensive end)

message: This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 06:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Scintillating scotoma

message: This article is linked from Migraine, and is listed as a synonym of amigrainous migraine, ocular migraine, and optical migraine. I've also heard it called opthamalic migraine by a doctor. Would it be appropriate to redirect all of those to this page? Or is one of them in fact a better name? --Masamage 03:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SS isn't actually a synonym, although it's a fairly common symptom.  It can be caused by other things, like glaucoma, and it's possible to have acephalgic migraines without SS.  I've tweaked the Migraine page accordingly. Good catch. CMat 21:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: I was looking for whether scintillating scotomas have any relationship to cerebrovascular disease.Wretan (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Prognosis

message: I was looking for reported evidence that they can be prevented (or, for that matter, treated.)Wretan (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are habituated to caffeine, you may find that gradual reduction of your caffeine intake reduces the frequency of visual migraines. I found that a reduction from three cups of coffee per day to one cup of coffee and as much tea as I like has nearly eliminated my migraines. Also note that there can be visual "triggers" that cause the migraine, and that they can sometimes be prevented by not looking directly at bright lights or reflections, or things that "shimmer".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Aspertame causes it for me.  After years of intake I became sensitive to the point that chewing a piece of gum with aspertame can directly trigger an episode. --70.72.152.209 (talk) 01:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

text: Taking low-dose Aspirin daily completely eliminates the problem for me.  When I stop taking Aspirin, I start having Migraines again.  YMMV. 2602:306:839B:1150:B1F3:6F7C:D73:CBA4 (talk) 04:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Prevention