lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jund Filastin

message: What does the "In the mid-twelfth century" part mean?  During the mid-12th century, the majority of the area was part of the crusader kingdom of Jerusalem. AnonMoos (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean the mid-13th century, that was the Ayyubid period, when there was apparently a military fief named "Filastin" which had no real substantial continuity with Caliphal Filastin (different borders, etc.). By the way, the main Palestine article seems to pretty much skip over the Ayyubid period... AnonMoos (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the specific page and link for the 20 mosques bit. . Go ahead and remove the 13th century bit, because Yaqut al-Hamawi was just quoting Istakhri (9th century) apparently. --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: mid-twelfth century?

message: This should probably be under Wikiproject Jordan too, since the boundary between Filastin and Urdunn ran basically east-west (as opposed to the 1923 boundary running in the north-south direction)... AnonMoos (talk) 08:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, WP Syria too, since it was a sub-province of Islamic Syria. --Al Ameer son (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of "greater Syria" but maybe not that relevant to Syria in its modern boundaries. AnonMoos (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not relevant modern Syria, but to the history of Syria which is in WP Syria's scope. --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Project

message: It's always nice when an article gets better over time (which is not the case with all Wikipedia articles)... AnonMoos (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks to those who improved this article
Talk:Supply chain operations reference

message: *Rolf G. Poluha: Application of the SCOR Model in Supply Chain Management. Youngstown, NY 2007, ISBN-10: 1-93404-323-0, ISBN-13: 978-1-934-04-323-3.
I suspect that this reference has been added purely for promotional purposes.  See Talk:Supply_chain_management#Reference_spam.3F -- Ronz  00:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed as spam. --Ronz 16:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference spam?
Talk:Bret Maverick

message: The photo of Garner and Kelly is from the original series, not this revival. It should be moved to the article on the original show. 68.146.233.86 (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's there but a photo of Garner and Kelly playing the same characters in similar costumes in the series upon which Bret Maverick was based would presumably be better than nothing despite there being no photographs in Wikimedia available for this series. Whirlspeed (talk) 13:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Misplaced photo

message: At the column on the top right, it says there are 18 episodes.  But, down below in the ratings section, it says there are 20 episodes.  Shouldn't both of these numbers be the same number?  One of them must be incorrect or entered incorrectly.  Could somebody figure out the real number and fix this problem?  HaarFager (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number Of Episodes? 

message: but maybe there's a story behind it. I don't know anything about the script writing, personel or studios etc, but William Shatner appears on the Big Valley episode "A Time to Kill" as Brett, an old friend of Jarrod Barkley, and in the opening scene Jarrod says to him, "Brett, you wild and wandering maverick!" Later it turns out the character is named Brett Skyler so there's no tie-in intended, but seems like it must have been a salute of some type. The episode is on youtube. 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:1DF6 (talk) 07:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's trivia, and perhaps insignificant
Talk:Jack function

message: There is somehing wrong with the defintion of $B$,
it does not depend on the superscript parameter.
This seems to be the same branching rule as in Macdonald edition 2, page 340, where the notation \psi'_{\lambda/\mu}
is used.
Paxinum (talk) 11:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:(Where Do I Begin?) Love Story

message: Were the lyrics added after the movie came out, or was it originally written with them? 66.234.220.195 (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: The piano cover or piano sample was also used for a 2-step UK garage song.  If anyone knows what it was called it would be great.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.169.30.10 (talk) 14:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 step 

message: Rick Astley is a very small part of this topic... yet this has been categorized under one of his songs and a third of the page is links to other Astley information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.63.208 (talk) 18:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rick Astley 

message: There is a mismatch between the date claimed here for the opening, December 25th, 1970 and the main Wikipedia article for the film that states "Love Story took place at Loews's State I theatre in New York City on Wednesday, December 16, 1970."
The date for the premiere was indeed the 16th. There had been many previews, and it's possible that the general release was held until December 25th, but here I feel it should be consistent with the main article. I propose to change to the same date and similar description. Cathcam (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for noting the discrepancy. I removed the phrase in question since it wasn't relevant to the point of the rest of the sentence. Danaphile (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Opening date
Talk:Jet Airliner (Steve Miller Band song)

message: Ok, is the term "blacklisted" waaaay too strong?  The song wasn't banned, for cripes' sake.  And the 9-11 thing was seven years ago.  Time to leave that sort of thing behind. 12.29.193.101 (talk) 00:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "''Blacklisted''"?!!! 

message: The sidebar correctly cites the song as being released on Capitol Records in its native USA, but then the photo illustrates a UK release on a different label.
Has anyone a photo to contribute of the US single?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.9.237.73 (talk) 05:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How interesting 
Talk:.gal

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was re-created at 18:09, 26 September 2013‎ – wbm1058 (talk) 02:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Zavaleta

message: While Dr. Antonio Zavaleta, Dr. Thomas Zavaleta and Paul Zavaleta may be quite notable locally the entries on the notable Zavaletas does not assert how they are notable in a sense that would meet Wikipedia guidelines. As such I have listed all the Zavaletas that have Wikipedia articles which follows the method used with other surnames (e.g.: Robertson, Thompson and Strauss). James E. Zavaleta Talk 02:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Zavaletas from notable Zavaletas
Talk:Local ordinance

message: There are improper uses of capitalization of the word "state" in this article currently.  A _S_tate is the governmental entity and the land it owns, while a _s_tate is merely the geographical region/boundaries, eg, State of New York would be the governmental entity and it's land in New York state.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.251.118.135 (talk) 07:42, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  _S_tate vs _s_tate 

message: Imperial Cities/Towns have been passing local ordinances already in the Holy Roman Empire. And, except for the years of 1933-1945, Germany has always been a federal state. The constitutional right of municipalities to pass local ordinances has nothing to do with the re-federalization of Germany after 1945. Sundar1 (talk) 05:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Local Government in Germany
Talk:Salinosporamide A

message: Why is the image of the structure taking up so much space? Nubinski 00:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found, according to Help:Contents/Images_and_media, that the text following the image tag is wrapped around the image.  So I modified the placement of the tags such that most of the text follows the image tags, but footnotes sections is formatted at the end for aesthetic reasons.  Heathhunnicutt 21:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jacobi rotation

message: Can this be merged with Givens rotation?—3mta3 (talk) 08:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article explains a Givens rotation applied to the Jacobi iteration. Instead of merging it I would just remove it and improve the article about Jacobi iteration.Mastomer (talk) 19:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's ridiculous enough we have an article on "rotations about a coordinate plane". We absolutely don't need two. viiii (talk) 04:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Givens rotation
Talk:Communist League (disambiguation)

message: What happened to the link to the new Communist League in the USA??
Rosa Lichtenstein 01:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article was deleted for lack of notability, third party sources, etc., although I can't find any record of it.  The CL appears to have had a split and their website is down. Rafaelgr (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:UltraISO

message: "Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam."
Why is this article here? This is just another shareware iso image editor. Nothing special about it at all.
This article should be deleted.
According to that logic almost all of the articles linked on List_of_CD/DVD_burning_software should be deleted.
I noticed this article was marked for deletion due to not being notable? I found it via a search for information on the .isz format, and this article explained it pretty well. If you do decide to delete this, could you make an actual page for .isz format, as there is no page for it now. 76.28.190.29 (talk) 04:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The tagging isn't for deletion it's questioning if it meets the notability standard in the hope that someone will expand the article to note that it does so. The encyclopedia is much enriched if articles indicate why they meet the standard. Generally notability is non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources independant of the subject, the only reference at the moment is not independant of the product (It's from the company who writes the software), and is arguably trivial in relation to the software itself as it focuses on the file format, not on the product. Again if further reading via the references were available the encyclopedia would be much enriched. There are many things which someone may find useful but wikipedia isn't just a repositry of everything and anything, it's an encyclopedia. --82.7.39.174 (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The file format is what makes this program most significant. An example, Sequential Circuits International, makers of hardware synthesisers, released MIDI as a royalty-free, openly documented interconnection method for electronic musical instruments. Who remembers SCI now? Mostly a few people with long and very specific memories. Who remembers MIDI? Everyone who has ever used any electronic musical instrument, either software or hardware, since around 1980! As the EZB proprietary format was openly documented and has been taken up by makers of software for Windows, Mac, Unix, etc, the same applies here. Now, you could argue that the FILE FORMAT therefore should have an article, but then you're faced with the matter of ducumenting its origins! It would hardly be the scholarly thing to do to eradicate truth now, would it? Whatever its faults, this article should stay. For one thing I'd have liked to see a bit of detail about the UltraIso virtual drive subsystem so I can understand it better, but I'll have to keep looking because it's not documented here. 81.187.19.110 (talk) 22:57, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Talk:The Dead Pit

message: I'm sad to say that Danny Gochnauer has passed away. Monday June 26th 2023. 2603:8090:2400:1B:B097:EE53:8F8D:A270 (talk) 18:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Gochnauer
Talk:Flatland (2007 Ehlinger film)

message: I bought this movie, and I really enjoyed it. However, the maker of the movie stated that he did not include televisions or writing in Flatland at all because such would be impossible. It actually is possible to write in Flatland: convert Braille into a line, put one line after another, and you've got a Flatland book. Feel it or look at it to read. For instance, the word "Flatland" would be written as "111000101010100000011110101010100000110110110100", with ones being shown as raised dots on the paper: spaces would be a 1. Spaces would use "000000". Likewise, a Flatland television could use the electron-gun method found in some old TVs in Spaceland, albeit firing onto a line, not a 2D screen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.104.128.55 (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing and Television in Flatland Are Possible! 

message: One fault in the reasoning behind not having rain ("everyone would drown") is that in the original book, there was some gravity, along the north-south axis. North was up, and south was down. Because of this, the roof of a house was always north, as the rain always fell south. No-one would drown, as water wouldn't collect.
Semininja (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rain 

message: As other sources are found, add them to this list.  --Lexein (talk) 11:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sources 

message: None of the sources in citations or EL support the claims made in the "writing the screenplay" section.  Because these are quotes and mentions of living people, WP:BLP comes into play, so the material must be supported by reliable sources. Not even Ehlinger's website supports these claims.  HELP! --Lexein (talk) 11:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That section actually plagiarized content from here, so I removed the entire section. Seeing that it's the official website, it's reliable for descriptive purposes, but the content needs to be rewritten before it is restored to the article. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:29, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for finding that. Funny - a Google search on text fragments didn't turn it up for me. --Lexein (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No refs

message: Is it possible to buy this anywhere? I'd really like to see it. Alphius (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can You Buy This Anywhere?
Talk:Trichloroacetyl chloride

message: The German names "trichloracetylchlorid" and "trichloracetylchlorür" referred to Hexachloroethane and Tetrachloroethylene respectively.(Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie, vol 75-76, 1850, p. 236) The term "acetyl" was first used to refer to the vinyl radical. A short search on Internet Archive showed me that this wasn't a one-time use. ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 13:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: On the name "trichloroacetyl chloride"
Talk:Is There a Doctor in the Mouse?

message: Can you remove the boxes that say that now?
(Catstorm 21:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: There's a revised plot and a title card now

message: The ending described in the plot sectipon is incorrect. The cartoon does NOT end with Tom packing up after seeing Jerry as a giant mouse. Please remove those details.
98.254.83.35 (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Hopefully correctly. In the future, please specify exactly which sentences/words you would like removed. Thanks. -Atmoz (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 23 October 2010
Talk:Rooster (TV movie)

message: This article is clearly about the same made for TV movie as the article Rooster (TV film). There has been a proposal to merge since January 2012. If there is no objection, I will complete the merge after a week or so. This article will be changed to a redirect to Rooster (TV film). Thank you, SchreiberBike (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Rooster (TV film)]]
Talk:Strategic business unit

message: i would like to know the legal implications ol an SBU in india? and any suceessful running model in India in the IT sector  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.247.253.183 (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BCG Matrix 

message: Shouldn't we add a shortcut SBU so that it would be easier to find this article?Wojnarj (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: sbu means small business unit ...those companies which consist of 10-15 employees.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.68.106.83 (talk) 08:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: SBU

message: This article is not good and needs to be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.53.229.169 (talk) 04:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this
Talk:Velocity Publishing

message: I found these guides in Savannah, Washington DC, and Charleston.  Looked into it and decided they had enough guides and cities to be notable. Youth in Asia 01:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The guides being notable does not necessarily make the publisher notable. ~Kvng (talk) 23:32, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Wikipedia's manual of style prohibits use of trademark or registered trademark symbols.  See MOS:TM. -- Kainaw(what?) 23:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of (r) symbols
Talk:Evangelical Lutheran Hymnary

message: The author of the article on hymnal Evangelical Lutheran Hymnary has received the following response:  
"It is proposed that this article be deleted, because of the following concern:
Prostylizing, POV, non-notable spam"
I object to this accusation.  Nothing in this writing is of a proslytizing nature.  In the freedom of speech, it describes a historic hymnary which has significance in how it is effecting other hymnals and church worship practices.  I am not even a current member of the said church body, yet recognize its significance to confessional  Lutheranism, Lutheranism, liturgical churches, and Christianity in general.  Those not interested in its contents would not likely seek out the article.  Those interested have a right to learn about this book as similar articles exist on other hymnals.
I found it less than useful that the one who objected did not offer suggestions on what he objected to, aqnd simply chose to have the article removed.  I believe there is and should be room for dialogue on this and ask for that consideration.  
People are free to belief what they do believe.  This article describes a worship book and exists in its proper catagory.  It likewise includes what has shaped this resource, and points out how it differs from similar resources.  I do not find this to be out of place, and it is certainly not spam.
I commit that I will not search out articles I have no interest in and label them "spam", and likewise, I will not search for religion articles on theologies I disagree with and label them "spam" or consider them "prosletizing."  I hope such was not the intent of the said objector.  
Please post your comments, positive or negative, and your reason for such comments.  If there is something which needs to be changed, lets talk.  At the same time, I ask that we do not approach history with a revisionist's pen.  --RikEischen 01:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author's First Comment 

message: Once again, "RandomHumanoid" has sought to stop this article on a hymnal, claiming it is "not encyclopedic."  I do not understand why he will not respond on the talk page, if he feels his concern is legitimate.  I still contest the removal of the article and stand by what I have written above.  In my opinion RandomHumanoid is trying to limit the scope of the encyclopedia by picking and choosing what he likes and what he doesn't.  As I've stated before, if you have an objection, please state it.
Here I will apologize:  I am a new writer to Wikipedia, and am not as familiar with how to respond to objectors.  I tried to respond to him personally, but was told I needed to be logged in and have a valid email address on my preferences page.  I was logged in, have had the email address listed and the box checked, and still somehow don't have access to communicate directly with RandomHumanoid.  I do not consider it too great a demand to request dialogue on this issue.  I hope this can be resolved properly and amiably.  --74.141.160.8 01:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author's Second Comment
Talk:Soledad Brothers

message: Created initial page here referencing George Jackson. It is only a stub for now.  If someone would like to expand it that would be great. Neilgg42 01:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: "On August 3, 1970 the Marin County Civic Center, which houses the Marin County Superior Court, was the scene of an assault by a group of African-American political activists led by Jonathan Jackson, the 17-year old brother of Black Panther militant George Jackson, demanding the release of the "Soledad Brothers". The group released several prisoners in the courtroom and took a number of hostages including the presiding judge, Harold Haley. A shotgun was taped to the judge's neck. While they were attempting to escape, Haley and prisoners William Christmas, James McClain, and Jonathan Jackson were killed as they attempted to drive away from the courthouse."
According to the wiki article on George Jackson, Jonathan acted alone in storming the courtroom - which is correct?
The final sentence is in error, as it describes Jonathan as one of the prisoners, which he was not.Irish Melkite (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Jonathan Jackson was not an inmate and he entered the courtroom alone. Location (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: * Bettina Aptheker credits Alabama-born children's author Emma Gelders Sterne with authoring the anonymous pamphlet that Davis read. - Aptheker, Bettina (1999) The Morning Breaks: The Trial of Angela Davis. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. , p. 44 --Dystopos (talk) 19:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sterne

message: , ,  Location (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:Janko group J3

message: It is customary to include the fixed points (= orbits of length =1) when using the (permutation- or cycle-) shape of a permutation - thus the
M24 example given is written 5^4.1^4 so that the degree ( = 24) may be deduced from the shape.
John McKay 66.130.86.141 (talk) 11:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shape of permutations 

message: Reduced large white space at 1024x768 by moving the infobox below the long <math> tags. Better to shrink the huge infobox itself, IMHO.  Discuss. --Lexein (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page appearance
Talk:Janko group J4

message: The relations listed for this group look wrong - the exponents should be integers only,  c^b  does not make sense in a group.
Cgwaldman (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: c^b is a standard shorthand for b^-1cb, the conjugate of c by b.  It reduces the lengths of the relations considerably. JackSchmidt (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjugates in relations