Talk:Digital photo frame

message: I just reverted  for the second time a spam link. The website, while at first sight a legitimate source of information, is actually a stepping stone to commercial/spam website. Tony 16:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, digital-photo-frame-market.info looks like a spam site.  The most prominent link on the main page is to a "buyer's guide" for consumers, but if you look at the "buyer's guide" all it does is try to direct you to one of three Amazon.com stores to buy a digital camera. PubliusFL 02:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Misterboom, what is your relationship to this website? Are you the owner, an author? Tony 15:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Maybe the best solution is not to use that site as a source for in--Misterboom 08:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there was no answer after a week, I removed the link. Tony 20:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Since you are the owner of the site, you cannot include it as a link. This is against Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Examples. "Conflict of interest often presents itself in the form of self-promotion, including advertising links, personal website links, personal or semi-personal photos, or other material that appears to promote the private or commercial interests of the editor, or their associates." Tony 15:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Source does not meet requirements of editorial oversight etc to be a reliable source. The link would probably not survive in an external link section either, especially since the editor who wrote the article also keeps adding links to his/her related commercial website rather than expanding the article itself. You might want to check WP:EL for info on adding links and/or ask for a third opinion at WP:30 to get several other editor opinions/recommendations. Flowanda | Talk 21:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam links 

message: The answer to this question could help the article: How does a digital photo frame display an image? Not all images will be to the exact dimensions of the frame, so does the digital photo frame 1) center the image? 2) stretch the image to fit? or 3) somehow crop the image for best display?  --Mjrmtg (talk) 00:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Question regarding Digital Photo Frames and images loaded on them 

message: The Transcend T.photo was released somewhere in May 2007. Was there one before that?
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcend T.photo 

message: two things really here
1) I am pretty sure the first digital photo frames were hacked together DIY jobs from old laptops etc, surely this should be mentioned?
2) on the security issues, shouldn't it mention that the trojan only effects computers running the Microsoft windows operating system?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by UltraMagnus (talk • contribs) 19:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hmm... 

message: I honestly never knew of the things til today.  There ought to be some more technical details regarding their development. JamesEG (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: Hello, 
I work closely with Nixplay, a digital picture frame provider. This page is missing a lot of information, plus the info. on here is pretty outdated. I wanted to work on updating the info. on this page and was wondering who exactly I would need to run this by? Especially since there would need to be major editing done. 
Thank you!Laurajodonnell (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information 

message: I just removed . This goes to the blog of a digital photo frame company which is now a broken link.
Calipediabrown (talk) 18:49, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Broken spam link