lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neil Pryde

message: RS1, RS3 (sail), RS4, Neil Pryde, and Neil Pryde RS:X don't seem to merit separate articles, given that all but the last are only a few sentences or less. ENeville 23:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: RS:X (sailboard) splitted off since this is an Olympic class at this moment and deserved a special page like all other (former) Olympic class.NED33 (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merges

message: The text (one sentence) from RS Racing has been merged into this article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RS Racing. Link to pre-redirect article: . CIreland 02:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of [[RS Racing]] 

message: Please can someone spin off a page about Neil Pryde the man.
eg. see here, which tells us: 
Born 1939, Te Aroha, New Zealand, Neil Pryde moved to Hong Kong in 1963 and represented Hong Kong
at sailing in the 1968 Olympic Games. Since then he has raced in some of the world’s most famous yachting events, including the prestigious Sydney to Hobart race in Australia.
Pryde is a member of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants (NZICA). 220.246.63.131 (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This actually should be about the man and not the company. According to the references I found, the Pryde Group would be the name. --TTTommy111 (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Neil Pryde (sportsman)

message: Neil Pryde, a new Zealand native and olympic sailor living in Hong Kong, starts his business manufacturing yacht sails in Hong Kong  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.78.95.4 (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neil Pryde the person who founded the Neil Pryde Ltd.
Talk:USS Starlight

message: I'm not sure if this should be a new article or covered here, but surely the loss of the ship with 26 crewmen killed deserves a more detailed mention? Mztourist (talk) 10:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added Benedetto reference to article. Perhaps someone can add a section of the article covering her merchant career later. Benedetto covers the events leading up to and including the sinking. The details of service from 1948 to 1969 are somewhat sketchy. Cuprum17 (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: SS ''Badger State''
Talk:The Simultaneous Man

message: Here are some obituaries for this novel's author, Ralph H. Blum (1932-2016):
* https://pcri.org/insights-blog/2016/5/26/ralph-h-blum-1932-2016
* http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/blum_ralph
Blum also has entries in LCCN: http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n82212193/ and VIAF: http://viaf.org/viaf/32141444
and here are entries for this book in VIAF: https://viaf.org/processed/XR%7CVIAFWORK16241342 and Worldcat: https://www.worldcat.org/title/simultaneous-man/oclc/16241342
-- The Anome (talk) 17:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ralph Blum
Talk:The White Peacock

message: It seems from "The Letters of D. H. Lawrence" that he suggested "The White Peacock" as one of several possible titles in a letter to Frederick Atkinson of 14 June 1910, and _maybe_ had decided on it- maybe not?- by the time of a letter to the same by 24 June 1910 ("As for titles, I am no good at them. ... That White Peacock must be shot; it is a bird from the pen of Wilkie Collins or of Ibsen.") Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:The Trespasser (novel)

message: The redirect The Trespasser(novel) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Nickps (talk) 23:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Trespasser(novel)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Lost Girl

message: Some changes are needed:
Her father's business had already failed and she had been brought up and come of age some years back when she met Ciccio.  She was terrified of becoming an old maid, as she approached 30, but could not stand the insensitive and dull men in her home town.  David R. Ingham 02:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis
Talk:Kallocain

message: I don't feel qualified to write a proper wikipedia article on this book, but since the information on it is very poor for the interested reader, let me just say it is an amazing book, and of the same calibre and spirit as Orwell's '1984', and Evgeni Zamiatin's 'We', if not better. There's a very human thought and constant re-rationalization process present in this book, and richer in sensitivity and emotional undertones which sets it apart from the other two. Lastly, possibly due to the fact that it is written by a female author, I felt gave it a distinct character from the other books, as if seeing the same dystopian events from a very different lens, focusing on the individual, and the value of life, emotions, and personal responsibility, rather than the futility, coldness and manipulation of the state, faltered or crooked logic, treatises on war, heroism, anti-heroism, etc.
but I'll leave that to the reader to agree or disagree. :)  Tpapastylianou (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Book, poor wikipedia entry
Talk:Swan Song (McCammon novel)

message: Some of the grammar in this article is horrible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.59.129 (talk) 06:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I copy edited this article, so all the spelling and grammar issues should now be fixed. However, the plot summary is still too long, and written in a rather disjointed way. It definitely still needs improvement. Spock of Vulcan (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy editing 

message: So at one point, just after I'd read the novel, I'd planned to trim up the plot summary and possibly expand the article at large, even though that's outside the scope of my usual efforts around these parts.  I genuinely think that it is likely that I'll never get around to the expansion (though I may come back for the plot trim) and, frankly, it's now been too many years since I've read it for me to feel confident in looking up themes and the like.  But if anyone else would like to undertake the task, I've kept my notes in my user sandbox here.  Please feel free to use anything I've gathered; I only ask that you don't edit my sandbox page for it.  Hope this helps someone. Cheers. Millahnna (talk) 00:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible resources for clean up and expansion
Talk:The Lover's Gift

message: I'm sure the 'stub box' above gives plenty of guidance for anyone planning to expand this, but I'd like to add my own as well. Here's what I wish I knew now: 1) the running time 2) the genre 3) the director 4) whether it was successful 5) role, if any, it played in film history 6) great moments 7) plot summary, maybe. Hope that helps, thanks. 128.135.100.161 19:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aram Saroyan

message: Does anyone want to note that his father wrote a novel titled 'My Name is Aram'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.114.243 (talk) 03:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is his wife's name? -Սահակ/Sahak (talk) 23:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife's name

message: It's a misspelled word. Does no one understand what poetry is? I can spell the word and andna, it doesn't make it poetry, it's a misspelled word. 50.47.111.213 (talk) 07:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean "lighght"? Chiagozie Elobuike (talk) 23:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mispelled word 

message: It was not likely in "the Courier typeface" unless it was typed on an IBM typewriter.  "Non-proportional" would be safe... AnonMoos (talk) 04:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  font quibble
Talk:List of assets owned by Warner Bros. Discovery

message: Don't they also own the Happy Birthday Song? IT'S TERRIBLE THAT THEY OWN THE MOST-SUNG SONG ON EARTH!! --15px|HomfrogHomfrogTell me a story!Contribulations15px|Homfrog 00:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Happy Birthday

message: I just added AOL Sports under brands / AOL. I noticed that there are a ton of brand.aol.com "sub-brands" that are missing. I was wondering if anyone would have any objections to adding more of these, and if they should be sub-bulleted under AOL as a brand, since AOL LLC and AOL as a site/brand are actually kinda different. Do aol.com sub domains count as brands? Maybe. Is the information useful for someone trying to grasp the overall branding structure of AOL? Absolutely.
Jozecuervo (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AOL Sports

message: I deleted "The Ass Truckers Whole Sale Club", which is both hilarious and obviously fake (I checked.) I don't have time to Google every single thing on this page, but maybe someone should scan through and look for any other fake entries. -- Zenex13 (talk) 04:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Truckers

message: I have this thought that HBO Inc. will join the WBD Networks unit. It only makes sense to consolidate their premium content now as HBO is driving away from HBO Max (Discovery+ merger). I think it'd likely join Factual & Lifestyle Group forming a "Premium Group." MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  HBO and Networks 

message: Now 8.48.248.24 (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  6hyrl4wkcku1xPHZJIkJ7S
Talk:Bernhard Karlgren

message: Niohe - Your article contains English errors and leaves out many important things. Yet when I try to address these failings, you immediately undo the changes.  This is counter-productive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.54.104.138 (talk) 
:Anonymous - please feel free to correct my grammar. But please don't remove statements that can be verified.--Niohe 00:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign your contributions and verify your statements.--Niohe 00:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: But it is customary to sign your contributions. Anyway, I am not ready to argue over this. Instead, it might be a better idea to remove WP:WEASEL statements like "his originality is exagerrated" and the like.--Niohe 00:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Did you check the link on WP:WEASEL? Anyway, I'm quitting this. I didn't write the article and it's fine if you can improve it. As for the claims that you make regarding the exaggerated originality, you are supposed to verify them, not me. Besides, this is not a debate forum or soapbox, so it would be good if you could maintain a neutral tone in your revision. I will check back in a couple of days.--Niohe 00:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we please use IPA,  not Yankee Academic nonsense? 46.97.168.251 (talk) 19:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ipa
Talk:Requiem for a Nun

message: I have a problem with the line "Almost universally misunderstood".  This is opinion, not verifiable, and should be removed. Tabrown97 (talk) 12:16, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have removed the line. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Almost universally misunderstood"

message: Camus' dramatization from 1956? - Can the date  be correct? On Oct. 20, 1955 (cf. http://www.chroniknet.de/daly_de.0.html?year=1955&month=10 )   (according to other sources  even  a little earlier on Oct. 9) the Zurich Schaupielhaus staged "the play's world première" in a German translation. But was this a translation of Camus' dramatization?  Who might have info? --Marschner (talk) 18:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Camus

message: In Moncrieff's translation of Proust's The Guermantes Way, 1921, one finds: "The past not merely is not fugitive, it remains present."  Same sentiment, different words, thirty years earlier in the original French. Larry Koenigsberg (talk) 15:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideas and quotes, two different things. 70.192.137.68 (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier source for "The past is never dead. It's not even past.." 

message: Faulkner did not publish any novels until 1926 as per his bibliobraphy. In his article it states that "He did not write his first novel until 1925. Sanctuary was not published until 1931. So I do not know where the image of the 1919 Chatto and Windus novel appears from, I have reverted for now as all sources (for example https://www.britannica.com/topic/Requiem-for-a-Nun-play-by-Faulkner) say that the novel was published in 1951...GrahamHardy (talk) 09:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion!
Talk:A Fable

message: I haven't read this book, and don't know what it's about, so I'm not about to edit this article, but it says the christ-like figure orders soldiers "not to disobey orders" to fire?  That doesn't seem very christ-like.  Is this an error?  Thanks.  -- Schwael 16:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction? 

message: The synopsis is some viewpoint on the story, which is the personal view of whoever wrote it and has nothing to do with the book.
For instance it is obvious from the book beyond any doubt that the general is the holy spirit, so to write what is written here with such conviction is really strange... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.81.143.213 (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is terrible
Talk:Galactic Patrol

message: It seems to me that the Prime Base and Ultra Prime articles are small and of little note, and should be merged with this more substantial article.  --Pariahpress 00:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll second that. The individual articles are very minor  and collecting them would beef up the GP one. Furrysaint 18:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kazohinia

message: Under the "Publications" section, the article mentions that there is a dispute on whether Szathmári has originally written the novel in Hungarian or Esperanto.  The afterword of Gépvilág és más fantasztikus elbeszélések, 2nd edition (Magyar Eszperantó Szövetség, Budapest, 1989) which is written by Benczik Vilmos says the following on this.
: [...] s 1935-ben új regénybe kezdett, a Kazohiniába.
: A Kazohinia – amely a szerző állítása szerint eszperantó nyelven íródott (bár ezt az állítást a filológiai vizsgálatok cáfolni látszanak) – 1937-re készült el, de magyar nyelven csak 1941-ben jelent meg, eszperantó nyelvű kiadása pedig 1958-ban látott napvilágot, ez utóbbi Párizsban.
Translated, this means the following.  In 1935, [Szathmári] has started to write a new novel [the old being Hiába], Kazohinia.  According to the author, Kazohinia was written in Esperanto, but philological studies seem to disprove this.  The novel was finished in 1937, but it was published in Hungarian only in 1941; in Esperanto it was published in 1958 in Paris.
The afterword later discusses that the 1941 edition was heavily censored;  that the uncensored edition was published in 1946, and that that edition also contained the author's afterword “A szegény csepűrágó dala”, and that this afterword was included in this very volume of Gépvilág because it was missing from later editions of Kazohinia.  
Indeed, my 1972 Hungarian language edition of Kazohinia (Magvető Zsebkönyvtár, Budapest, 4th edition)  does not include “A szegény csepűrágó dala”.  It, though, has an afterword by Dezső Kereszturi, which mentions the afterword of the 1946 edition, and seems to indicate that it is omitted by the will of the author.  
Some of the information I listed above (and some more from the three afterwords) should be included in this and the Sándor Szathmári article and its translations, let me thank in advance anyone who is willing to help me in that.  – b_jonas 20:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original language
Talk:The Sound of His Horn

message: Seems to owe as much to that story as anything, but I can't recall who wrote it...  Trekphiler 07:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: now linked on this page. However, linking to all the stories which feature humans as prey is a form of original research if we are comparing and contrasting them. Unless we are paraphrasing others comparisons.66.80.6.163 (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

text: I also strongly disagree with Trek's assertion. This book is about Nazi culture and the ultimate consequences of their ideology; the story was a thriller/adventure story with no subtext whatsoever. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 20:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "[[The Most Dangerous Game]]"
Talk:Netcast

message: The user User:Gavinstarks has added major edits to this article (read: removed 90% of it) without discussion within this page.  This is in accordance with wikispam (Wikipedia:Spam) and shall not be tolerated further.  If you feel anything in the article is there without purpose, please discuss it here. --24.20.181.127 01:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please discuss your edits before deleting this article 

message: We cannot go around and changing every mention of Podcast on the Wiki to Netcast. Many people still use podcast, and I don't think Netcast has been around enough, or being used enough to allow mass changes like I've seen the past few days. - CaptainAmerica 00:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ---> I saw some fishermen netcasting the other day! Q:What's wrong with webcast? --Travisthurston 23:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think anything is wrong with Podcast... - CaptainAmerica 00:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Only positive responses after well over a week, so I'm going ahead and merging. -- Vary | Talk 03:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Use of Netcast on Wikipedia 

message: Can we Zunecast instead? --Travisthurston 02:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If only you weren't the first to come up with that - CaptainAmerica 22:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh god........ :) -- Will it have PlaysForShit in it? -- Tawker 18:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I got it... Zunecasting! 

message: Surely this statement:
By Septermber 26, 2006, a number of individuals had begun using term "netcast", including large corporates such as CBS. [1] who used it prior to Laporte's proposal. CNET's Buzz Out Loud podcast also used "netcast" jokingly before Laporte mentioned it in his keynote at the Podcast Expo.
Is misinformation. So a number of individuals had started to use it, and then giving an example of two who used it before Leo suggested it? Surely thats just wrong --217.65.158.91 09:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinformation 

message: It is quite inappropriate that Netcast redirects to Podcast.  Podcast is a subtype of netcast.  Does noone remember the word 'netcast' in the late 90s?  Well before iPods, let alone Podcasting, was ever thought of.--71.240.45.29 02:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide reliable sources of its use pre-podcast?--Crossmr 19:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I second that.  Isn't "podcasting" specifically for picking up files based on a list of files (such as from an RSS feed)?  The TWiT network for example also streams their shows live.  And, due to some editing, the live stream is not quite the same as the content made available in non-real-time.  They're also not Webcasts either, because to me, "Webcast" implies specifically using HTTP as the transport protocol (which it could be others, such as RTP, RTSP, or whatever).  -- Joe (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting to Podcast
Talk:Brown sauce (meat stock based)

message: To be quite honest, I would tend to doubt that most English-speakers outside the British Isles would tend to think of the British sense of "brown sauce" before any other. Native British food simply doesn't have the international influence that French cooking does, making giving the UK version as the primary definition overly UK-centric. Haikupoet 00:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoughts on primacy of definition

message: in the British and Irish cuisine section, it states that HP was first made in 1093 I assume this is incorrect (I'm guessing it's 1893) - I havn't changed it because, it may well be 1093... but I'd thought I'd clarify. J.P.Lon 06:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date correction needed?

message: Someone moved the fruit/vinegar-based "brown sauce" material to Steak sauce. Since I'm not happy with the "other" meaning being the most important default (I don't think either has a concrete case, and many people searching for brown sauce will be expecting HP/Steak sauce anyway), I moved it.
On the other hand "Brown sauce (meat stock based)" isn't a great name, I'll admit. Feel free to move it again (and fix the links), although I recommend against naming it after French/Danish cuisine as this is (a) unwieldy and (b) Assumes that this type of sauce is unique to those cuisines. Fourohfour 17:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved
Talk:Mount Sinai Memorial Park Cemetery

message: There is also a related cemetary in Simi Valley. Should it be mentioned? --Max 00:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Laverton, Western Australia

message: How do you say "Laverton"? Is it  or ? That is to say, is the A long or short? If you know, please insert the source code for the right one in the article. Thanks. Kelisi (talk) 20:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Fantastica

message: I changed one sentence related to the movie name of the land. It is not really correct to say that the name in the movie was changed: granted, the book was translated earlier, but I guess the movie names weren't based on this translation at all, they were just created as a new translation of the original names. These are two independent translations, so nothing really was changed.
And for those who change "Fantastica" to "Fantasia", I have this. ~_^ 夢の騎士Yume no Kishi - Talk 04:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fantastica vs. Fantasia
Template talk:The Thin Man

message: There is also a 1975 TV film Nick and Nora, episode from the Wide World Mystery series, starring Craig Stevens (Nick) and Jo Ann Pflug (Nora). See http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0748279/. Any need to mention it somewhere? (I took a reference to it out from The Thin Man (film), because it really didn't belong there). --FordPrefect42 (talk) 09:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV episode
Talk:Le Chevalier de Maison-Rouge

message: I'd very much like to see this article expanded, as it hardly even touches upon the plot, and it dosn't even mention the public's reaction to the novel.  I'll do some research and expand as much as I can - but I would appreciate some help from someone who perhaps knows more about Dumas than I.--Dark Green 21:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Template talk:The Matrix

message: :Wow, that's a ridiculously large template. It's a lot bigger than some of its articles. --Fang Aili talk 19:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

message: suggestion renaming to TheMatrix. There's a lot of matrixes and "The Matrix" was the series name. SakotGrimshine 14:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, though you'd need a bot to do all the renaming in the articles, and this issue isn't troublesome until there is a template for one of the other matrix meanings. Pomte 22:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion renaming to TheMatrix 

message: Can someone please add the articles Bluepill and Redpill to this template--Rabbitdude 06:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mgiganteus1 11:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addung content that's missing 

message: The fashion didn't set off if it wasn't for this movie. an article on it should be listed on the template. Mystic Monkey  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.33.181 (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Those black coats 

message: I think this template ought to mention the Nokia 8110, which (with the addition of a spring) was the telephone used in The Matrix. Even though this template's syntax looks relatively simple, I want to "Be not too bold" with respect to templates. Particularly since there's a petition to bring the Nokia 8110 back into production just because it was used in The Matrix, I think this template ought to give it at least a mention. 207.65.109.10 (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention [[Nokia 8110]].