Talk:Zoran Milanović

message: The new government will be formed in December 2011, not January 2012.
Ref (among others): http://hrsvijet.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18860:zoran-milanovi-dobio-mandat-za-sastavljanje-vlade&catid=1:politika&Itemid=9
--Wustenfuchs 14:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't matter. WP:CRYSTAL applies. Write about it once it happens, not before. Timbouctou (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not about that. Infobox mentions when he is going to take the office. --Wustenfuchs 17:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is exactly about that. We don't know when he would take office - he has to receive a mandate from Josipović once the election results are official, then the Sabor has to convene and then they have to vote for the new government. It will happen either in late December or early January but nobody knows for sure when that would happen so instead of guesswork the infobox should say "To be determined". Oh and btw try finding a single source which considers him "10th" Prime Minister. Timbouctou (talk) 19:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Croatian government 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Zoran Milanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070803020940/http://www.javno.com/hr/hrvatska/clanak.php?id=49361 to http://www.javno.com/hr/hrvatska/clanak.php?id=49361
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120124113754/http://www.zivotopis.hr:80/biografija/zoran-milanovic/ to http://www.zivotopis.hr/biografija/zoran-milanovic
*Added  tag to http://www.javno.com/en/croatia/clanak.php?id=102748
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110817075213/http://www.novilist.hr/hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Rastrgali-zastavu-HDZ-a-zapalili-SDP-ovu-i-EU-a to http://www.novilist.hr/hr/Vijesti/Hrvatska/Rastrgali-zastavu-HDZ-a-zapalili-SDP-ovu-i-EU-a
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070803020940/http://www.javno.com/hr/hrvatska/clanak.php?id=49361 to http://www.javno.com/hr/hrvatska/clanak.php?id=49361
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Zoran Milanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/articles/view/34990/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/60145/ponovljeni-izbori-sdp-dobio-sibenik-i-trogir
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927013810/http://www.vlada.hr/en/naslovnica/novosti_i_najave/2009/listopad/predsjednica_vlade_s_predsjednikom_vlade_republike_slovenije_borutom_pahorom to http://www.vlada.hr/en/naslovnica/novosti_i_najave/2009/listopad/predsjednica_vlade_s_predsjednikom_vlade_republike_slovenije_borutom_pahorom
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927013843/http://www.vlada.hr/en/naslovnica/novosti_i_najave/2009/studeni/predsjednica_vlade_rh_kosor_i_predsjednik_slovenske_vlade_pahor_otvorena_nova_stranica_u_odnosima_dviju_zemalja to http://www.vlada.hr/en/naslovnica/novosti_i_najave/2009/studeni/predsjednica_vlade_rh_kosor_i_predsjednik_slovenske_vlade_pahor_otvorena_nova_stranica_u_odnosima_dviju_zemalja
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203150728/http://odluka2011.dnevnik.hr/clanak/vijesti/predsjednik-josipovic-raspisao-izbore.html to http://odluka2011.dnevnik.hr/clanak/vijesti/predsjednik-josipovic-raspisao-izbore.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150730023935/http://dalje.com/en-croatia/milanovic--croatia-is-withdrawing-from-arbitration/551421 to http://dalje.com/en-croatia/milanovic--croatia-is-withdrawing-from-arbitration/551421
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://arhiva.nacional.hr/en/articles/view/33608/18/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It says in the opening paragraph that after law school he served in the Foreign Ministry, but it doesn't specify of what country. So that doesn't add up.  Something is missing, and I believe he worked in the Yugoslav ministry before Croatia's secession.
Also, attached to the Croatian mission to NATO and the EU, the word "counselor" is used.  In the English language, this has a confusing meaning in this context.  Was he "legal counsel" in which case counselor should be changed to "counsel." If it is meant to say that he was a special advisor, then the word "advisor" should be used.  Counselor in the English usually means a therapist; if he was part of a council, then the word councillor is used. Canlawtictoc (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service to Yugoslav Foreign Ministry missing 

message: Please discuss here. Thanks in advance. --Tuvixer (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits of 93.138.105.159 

message: The article focuses on far too many banal comments, it reads like a competition of some kind, ie "first time inauguration was held at place x."  These would be merely stylistic points not worth taking issue with were it not for the length of the article.  An encyclopedic article on a living politician of a small country for the purposes of a global audience probably doesn't need to list so many specific dates - someone has added the exact dates ie DD MON YR of fairly banal points, which makes the article further bulky and disjointed to read.
There is also little criticism, and/or, it focuses on political bickering that may be appropriate for tabloid papers, but really is not important in the grand scheme of things, such as his decision to convert holdings from Swiss francs to euros, for example. Historiaantiqua (talk) 07:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is too long