Talk:Port of Antwerp

message: Some information given on the Antwerp page could be repeated here. 
It might interesting to list the names of the docks and their construction date. 
A description of the word "Natie" could be provided.
Some details of post-war development policy might be given: switch from the use of equipment owned by the municipality to private owners, dedicated berths, etc. 
Role as NATO port
Centrality index and arguments
Iron Rhine discussion
Some words about dockworkers and labour organization 
Augusta2 (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc. Other Matters

message: Berendrecht Lock or the Berendrecht Lock? I prefer "the Berendrecht lock" as "Berendrecht" is not sufficiently familiar to English speakers to be used as a fixed expression. 
I realize that opinions may differ in this connection. But would also like to ask you to think about Kallo Lock, Van Cauwelaert Lock, Boudewijn Lock, and Royers Lock. In all these cases I think that the use of the definite article would be more appropriate. I will concede that Churchill Dock, Delwaide Dock, Marshall Dock, Amerika Dock might better without the article. But would one write B1 Canal Dock or the B1 Canal Dock? 
Augusta2 (talk) 00:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: The article reads: This lock has a depth of 13.50 m, which makes the sill depth at mean high water equal to 17.75 m. Is the lock submerged under 4.25 m at mean high water? Most other sources say it is 18 m deep (which would allow a draught of 17.75 m?). --AHert (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth of Berendrecht Lock 

message: Although the material about the liberation of Walcheren is interesting I feel it is only marginally relevant to the Port of Antwerp, and in any case it is far too detailed and poorly integrated into the remainder of the article. This material might be better included in the Battle of Antwerp or an article on the Liberation of the Scheldt. I will delete much of this contribution within the next few weeks unless objections are posted are here. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 22:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW II addition 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Port of Antwerp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828050144/http://www.portofantwerp.com/portal/page/portal/POA_EN/Focus%20op%20de%20haven/Een%20wereldhaven to http://www.portofantwerp.com/portal/page/portal/POA_EN/Focus%20op%20de%20haven/Een%20wereldhaven
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131215144754/http://www.portofantwerp.com/newsadmin/node/1831 to http://www.portofantwerp.com/newsadmin/node/1831
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article is only about the port of Antwerp, not about the general port company 'Port of Antwerp-Bruges'. This article should get its old name 'Port of Antwerp' back. A separate short article about the port company 'Port of Antwerp-Bruges', that originated from the merger between the port companies of both ports ('MBZ' and 'Port of Antwerp') could be created. However, both ports still exist as separate ports, with separate locations, history, identity,...
This name for this article is just completely wrong. Le Fou (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, per the request that was made at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  23:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name