lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jonas Wendell

message: Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources Tearlach 18:37, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary sources

message: I notice the whole article comes nearly verbatim from http://www.pastor-russell.com/misc/wendell.html "©2001, Pastor-Russell.com" Tearlach 20:36, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More on sourcing
Talk:Milk tea

message: Should this page be a disambig page? The listing looks like specific types of milk teas rather than synonyms for milk tea.—Tokek 18:40, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Risanahsim (talk) 13:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing

message: — Assignment last updated by Eve1617 (talk) 03:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 1 TR

message: This article seriously needs to be swept for grammar issues. The first sentence alone uses a comma in place of a period, and ends with an erroneous "Read More", as if copy-pasted from another website. I would do it myself if I wasn't in the middle of something. Mokushiroku no Yami (talk) 22:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofing Required 

message: , ,  is this article currently a subject of a class project? Valereee (talk) 18:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cte Nithol, ditto. Valereee (talk) 18:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ian (Wiki Ed)? Valereee (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  it does look that way, but this isn't a class we support. I'll leave the students a note on their talk pages asking their instructor to contact us or post to WP:ENB Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class project?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Stevertigo

message: Everyone makes mistakes and no one should be raked over the coals forever for their past transgressions. However, Stevertigo's latest edits to his talk page strongly imply that he does not acknowledge any misconduct on his part. This is especially worrying given the unanimous condemnation of his abuse of admin powers on this RfC. At a minimum, there should be some sort of apology and/or acknowledgment of abuse instead of rants against the system. Carbonite | Talk 19:09, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acknowledgment of misconduct
Talk:Geneva drive

message: have to separate the Maltese Cross which like every cross always has four arms from the more general term Star Wheel that may be three- or five-armed, and so on ? Filmtechniker--80.219.134.244 (talk) 09:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't we

message: Not up for editing the article myself, but the 10,000 year clock project has some fantastic examples of the Geneva Drive principle: http://longnow.org/clock/chimes/ :) 194.176.105.151 (talk) 16:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 10,000 Year Clock

message: Geneva mechanisms are also used for precision object placement throughout extreme temperature ranges.  They are used within cryogenic temperature chambers to rotate precision apertures into and out of position.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.18.113.149 (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Applications 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Geneva mechanism 6spoke animation.gif will be appearing as picture of the day on June 3, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-06-03. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Geneva mechanism 6spoke animation.gif]] to appear as POTD 

message: This article lacks the information required to design one.
A suggested source with overlays is here. And one is animated here. 
Note that a 2 position wheel is not possible because a circle does not have a 180° angle on it, and the peg needs to hit a wall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlieb000 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no "formula" as such.  It's a simple combination of radial slots and arcs centred on the driving wheel. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please read my “suggested source”. The design is more complex than you would assume. Some people do not like trial and error (While i was ignorant, the one i designed would not rotate properly because the arc in the rotor would rotate into the cross as it turned - because the bars on either side of the slots were flared too wide. Then I realised that the shafts more than likely need to be a certain distance apart, so I hunted for formulas.) And to correct you, there are seven formulas.Charlieb000 (talk) 01:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's rather the problem. As there is no single formula for this (if there was, the maths would be unpleasantly discontinuous) it's stated instead as a set of separate conditions.  If you want to express the design constraints, then the right-angled triangle might be the clearest way to express these, rather than some formula. It shows the need for the pin to engage with the slot in a purely radial direction, it also makes the limit on slot depth needed quite easy to see. Personally though I've always found them pretty easy to design (I laser cut stuff and make automata). Andy Dingley (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula Please!!!
Talk:Science World (Vancouver)

message: wow, this page definitely needs a photo.  i'll try to go take one soon.
--Doviende 20:17, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: WP:Name says "Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature."
Isn't "Science World" really the most commonly used name for this building? I realize that "Science World at TELUS World of Science" may be its official name, but WP policy suggests that names should be chosen according to use. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move? 

message: This article had been the showcase article at Portal Vancouver articles on April 2007.  The portal has now been changed to rotational status, and as the article was a previous showcase, is again on the portal. Congratulations to all the editors of the article thus far. As is noted on the nomination page .... something to draw attention to articles that are in good shape so that we can get them in better shape, and eventually into great shape.  So if someone familiar with this article's content, can promote the article's status that would set the portal in better shape as well as the article.  Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 00:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Portal:Vancouver/Articles|Portal Vancouver articles]]
Talk:Walter Payton NFL Man of the Year Award

message: Hopefully, it doesn't need to be cleaned up anymore.  ;)  --Zoop 06:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Since Payton didn't start playing until 1975, this award must have been named something else before. What was it? —Wrathchild (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just "NFL Man of the Year Award". Lizard (talk) 17:25, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the old name? 
Talk:Tafarki Foundation

message: Through PFA, NFA and PhFA, The Tafarki Foundation challenges indigenes of African in general and members of these local communities to take a leading role in finding local solutions to these global problems.
This was taken straight from Who We Are and I do not restate ideas very well right now.--Rmky87 15:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What I commented out
Talk:Graphics program

message: Just a thought: This article seems written from the perspective of a techie. Instead of categorizing incomplete lists of graphics apps according to their technical underpinnings of raster or vector, it might be more useful to mention broad categories of graphics tools and how they're used; for instance, illustration, page layout, painting, 3D, animation, CAD, motion, GIS, interactive, Web design, special effects, photo/image processing, etc. Besides, many current generation graphics apps blur the distinction between vector and raster by incorporating elements of both (or, for that matter, neither). I certainly wouldn't eliminate an explanation of the differences between raster- and vector-based apps, because it is important, but maybe it shouldn't constitute the undepinnings of the article. I hesitate, however, to make these kinds of basic changes to an article that's had so many contributors without first asking opinions. Maylett 19:34, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:French combat vehicle production during World War II

message: The numbers given in Jane's' World War II Tanks are slightly different. This is mostly due to the fact that Jane's doesn't include the June numbers. In the case of the R 35 and the AMC 35 export is not taken fully into account. The old number of 35 Char B1's is still thought to be correct. One number is however an obvious error: the R 35 May number should be 206, not 106. Another number is completely of the mark and inexplicable to me: 315 pre-war Char B1 bis, whereas the true number is 129.
--MWAK 19:52, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is a radiotank?  Should we have a page on it?
IceDragon64 (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed "radio tank" is somewhat ambiguous; it's not a radio-controlled vehicle. I'll change it into "radio communication tank".--MWAK (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiotank
Talk:Iraqi Police

message: Well, yesterday at the American Leigon during in Cannan, during their (the towns) annual event called "Old Home Days" or something like that, there was was stuff on display from an MP in Iraq and there were some IP bassards on the table. Wish I had my camera. --Saint-Paddy 19:54, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Have a read through reference 13 regading figures of servicemen killed, and deserting the force. There's no mention of desertion whatsoever, the figure of 12,000 is the combined number of 4,000 killed and 8,000 injured. Bit misleading.
MH 20/11/2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.97.245.84 (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Desertion

message: The current pic in the intro, :Image:Governor'sHouseSamawah.jpg, is not characteristic of the uniform worn by the Iraqi police. I added a pic in the uniform section of Iraqi police wearing uniforms that are characteristic of the typical uniform. Jumping cheese Cont@ct 08:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic

message: Mosr of the content is missing from the article. --Niemti (talk) 18:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bad case of post 2003 recentism 

message: Except for a single passing mention, there's nothing in the article newer than 2006 -- eight years ago. Considering the U.S. has been gone for nearly three years, and the Islamists have taken over the country, I question how much of the information included here is of more than purely historical interest.--Michael K SmithTalk  15:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update badly needed 

message: If some body in iraq jail how to we r contect 143.92.151.167 (talk) 15:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing persone  

message: The ERD (famously equipped with Abrams tanks) is just once mentioned when it's misspelled as "Emergency Response Unit". The whole article seems to be 10 years out of date in addition to being very short for a hundreds of thousands strong group of forces. It's in fact, even update-tagged since 2015, and above there's comment titled "Update badly needed" since... 2014. 5.173.88.58 (talk) 11:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal Police, Emergency Response Division, etc should all be split into their own articles (also, UPDATE NEEDED)
Talk:Bill Davis Racing

message: I would edit the page to reflect this, but I am not capable enough to do so.  Link to a source confirming Bill Davis sold the team http://www.usatoday.com/sports/motor/nascar/2008-12-22-bill-davis-racing_N.htm Nonpoint74 (talk) 20:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Team sold

message: It says in this article that BDR started fielding Busch Series cars in 1996, but then in the Jeff Gordon article, it says he ran for BDR in 1991 and 1992. So, which one is it? Neither one is sourced, and I am looking for one right now. BsroiaadnTalk 22:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996 or earlier? 
Talk:The Flying Karamazov Brothers

message: I merged this article from The flying karamazov brothers... Eliot 19:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Quite a bit of hype here: "world famous… extremely popular… rocketed to international fame". We rarely use language that strong in talking even about someone like Brad Pitt or the Rolling Stones. - Jmabel | Talk 07:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).  Dismas|(talk) 12:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I know that. I'm an admin. Usually I prefer to let whoever has been working on the article have a shot at toning this sort of thing down rather than come in with an axe, but if you prefer I will do the latter. - Jmabel | Talk 04:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hype

message: This section should be removed. None of the supposed sources seem to contain any of the information in the section. Instead, they point back to previous references which are about other things. One of the references is to a LinkedIn item, which is only available to members, therefore, not open to easy verification. If the information contained in this section is true, it needs better sourcing. The only source I can find is a single New York Post article with no follow-ups. Theonemacduff (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct . If you want to wait a day or so to see if anyone else responds that would be okay but it could be removed now as well. As you are the one who did the research you should do the honors in removing the material as you see fit. MarnetteD|Talk 17:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit
Talk:Jessica Nordell

message: I just started this page on Jessica Nordell, though I know I'm missing a lot of her film work and edited books.  Please help me get this page up to date and accurate.  Thanks!
--Rwidome 20:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Mysterious Cities of Gold

message: the image shown on the article is for the sequel and not for the original series, the drawing style and characters are drastically different.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.203.129.163 (talk) 01:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: no, the infobox image is from the dvd of season 1, so it is correct.--Sxerks (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect image 

message: There is one.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/261940/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.84.80 (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Game 

message: There is a contradiction over the original run dates:
*In the lead: "The series premiered in Japan on NHK on 29 June 1982 and ran weekly for 39 episodes until its conclusion on 7 June 1983"; these dates are repeated in the infobox.
*In the Anime section: "The series originally aired in Japan on NHK (the national public broadcaster) and premiered on May 1, 1982, running weekly for 39 episodes until its conclusion on February 5, 1983."
They can't both be correct. Further 39 weeks from 29 June 1982 is 29 March 1983 not 7 June. 39 weeks from 1 May 1982 is 29 January 1983 (5 February is 40 weeks, which would account for one week for Christmas).  The source given in the Anime section (TV.com) isn't working for me at the moment so I can't verify it. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese Wikipedia says it ran from June 29 1982 to June 7 1983. It also has dates for every episode, with no episodes for the 10th and 17 August, 19th October, 2nd November, 28th December, 4th Jan, 1st and 8th Feb, 22nd and 29th April, 3rd May. No sources are present for this, however. Shiroi Hane (talk) 18:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

text: The issue was with tv.com I removed it as an unreliable user edited source. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original run dates - contradiction and maths error
Talk:Interstate 10

message: I just finished reformatting the article, and returned most of the images to their associated sections (ie. picture of I-10 in Arizona belongs in the section which discusses I-10 in AZ; picture of I-10 in Louisiana belongs in the section which discusses I-10 in LA).  Given the nature of the article and the fact that each of the sections link to an independent article on the subject, I think it makes more sense to format the article this way than by grouping all of the images into one box that removes the images from their associated context.  I've also slightly reduced the image sizes and tried very hard to format the article and images in a way that allows for optimal viewing on standard devices (ie. desktop, laptop, surface device) when viewed at 100%.  If their is some sort of standard or convention for this type of article that I am not aware of please let me know by leaving a comment on my talk page or by continuing the conversation here.  Bmhs823 (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images in associated sections
Talk:James Wright (poet)

message: Three additional links have been added to the Works section, 2 from the standard bibliographies on Wright and one brand new title, published in May 2005. Don 20:50, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Come on.  The opening paragraphs of this article are nonsense and need to go. Danny Lilithborne 00:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *While some of it is certainly not neutral ("wildly" and "stunning" come to mind in the sentence quoted), is the whole nonsense?  It's verifiably true that the listed poems in the third paragraph are widely anthologized.  Is he one of the "most beloved" poets?  He does hold some kind of record for most elegized contemporary poet, it seems like.  The overview of his career in the first paragraphs also strikes me as being factually accurate, if somewhat flowery.  Should we just tone down the laudatory nature of it?  If I'm reading the history right, whoever added this section also added to Charles Simic, Galway Kinnell, Pablo Neruda, and W.S. Merwin, all related poets.  Don't have time tonight to see what was done to those pages.  Salvador dalai llama 04:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: *I am very familiar with Wright's work, and the only questionable adjective in the description is "wildly".  No one influenced by Bly is going to be considered wildly anything.  But the rest of the adjectives are more descriptive than not of his work.Stephen 19:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Wright had discovered a terse, wildly imagistic free verse of stunning grace, clarity, and power''? 

message: The lack of references are especially troublesome because of the statements about depression and manic-depression (bipolarity). Can anybody supply appropriate refereneces, please? Thanks Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References on mental illness 

message: I am unable to find any sources that show that James Wright graduated from Yale University in 1951 and then traveled to Rabat, Morocco. This is a rather odd claim considering he graduated from Kenyon College in 1952.
--76.105.142.245 (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yale alumni?
Talk:Ian Clarke (computer scientist)

message: Changes based on this Sunday Times article [] - Daveirl
:I'll ask himself within the next weeks or so. --Eldred 12:54, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd guess he puts down Dublin as his place of birth on his website so that people from abroad will know where it is -- Daveirl 21:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SU carburetor

message: There are several ways to spell carburetor/carburettor/carburetter. The second two are listed in UK dictionaries, the first is American I believe. This article moved from one spelling to another and another. For the sake of consistemcy within the article, I have made the spelling 'carburettor' throughout. I chose this because it is the most usual of the UK spellings, and because it was a British company. I have not changed the spelling in the article name.  Emeraude 17:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of carb 

message: My direct experience on the SU Carbs, using more advanced diagnostic equipment, is that Atomization was not as it was claimed to be. At idle, or at constant speeds, atomization of the mixture was incomplete. The "downstream" side of the needle often acted as a capillary, allowed a path for unevaporated fuel, which would collect and then "break off" as solid fuel droplets or chunks, into the airstream. This is why idle speeds on many SU equipped cars would often hiccup, as the engine on one or two cylinders would suddenly have to burn through this stuff.
-- John F. -- former garage owner  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnfalky (talk • contribs) 19:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Atomization

message: The entire History section of this article, as well as SU Carburetter are taken from the SU Carburetter Company corporate site.  The text was added on November 6, 2009 but User:Burlenwiki.  I will add both this site and SU Caruretter to Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 May 19 Scottanon (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a copyvio, it's a WP:COI if anything (look who Burlen Fuel Systems are) Andy Dingley (talk) 20:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations