Talk:Pete Conrad

message: Major edit completed 1-20-2008.  My first major edit.  Comments and critique welcome.  Jim Simmons.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim Simmons (talk • contribs) 15:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Charles "Pete" Conrad seriously MUST redirect to this article! 98.81.15.87 (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While I tend to agree, that violates the Wikipedia policy of using the most common name; please read it. Apparently most "everyone" refers to him as "Pete", which trumps his birth certificate. JustinTime55 (talk) 20:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this would be okay as a redirect without running afoul of WP:UCN.  It would be only renaming the article hat would be a problem. Most (all?) of the examples listed as "Not" at UCN do redirect to the desired page. TJRC (talk) 03:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Would the embedded quotes cause an issue in the search engine, i.e. would this be the same as " Charles Pete Conrad " ? (Would that would be moot?) JustinTime55 (talk) 15:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't look like it would be a problem.  I just searched on both, and got ro two different "not found" pages.  I'm not convinced it is worth creating (although I wouldn't object to it), because I don't know how likely it would be to be used.  Redirects are cheap, though.  The one way it might be useful if someone is reading an article on another web site, and, wanting to find more about him, cut-and-pasted the name into a Wikipedia search.  Right now, searching for either Charles "Pete" Conrad or Charles Pete Conrad, this article is only the second one in the results list, after Charles Conrad, so that's some indication it might be a worthy redirect. TJRC (talk) 21:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect Needed !! 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Pete Conrad's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "NASA":
From Supermoon: 
From Apollo 12: 
From List of space travelers by name: 
From Arlington National Cemetery: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Pete Conrad]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pete Conrad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20132211063000/http://www.astronautix.com/astros/conrad.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/astros/conrad.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pete Conrad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20132211063000/http://www.astronautix.com/astros/conrad.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/astros/conrad.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: collier is self serving award, does not mean activity on Spacelab or iss benefited mankind  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.224.34 (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what your point is. The article simply documents that the crew was given the award, and the basis stated by the NAA for that award. If you feel the award was not justified, or disagree with the NAA's stated reasons for awarding it, that's not a matter for Wikipedia; your beef is with the NAA. TJRC (talk) 16:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  These kind of fly-by off-topic message-board-type posts by random IPs should just be deleted. (imo) - wolf 19:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right, but I try to construe most notes like this as a genuine attempt to improve the article, which is probably a bit pollyanna of me. TJRC (talk) 20:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collier award