lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1960 European Nations' Cup squads

message: Despite the fact that the quarterfinals are not considered part of the tournament proper, would anyone be opposed to including the four losing quarterfinalists on this page? Libro0 (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For me it's ok. --necronudist (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the sources you have? I do have some reservations for this, since the quarterfinals are not really tournament proper. Chanheigeorge (talk) 20:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

text: How about players for the semifinalists, those that played in the quarterfinals, but did not travel to the tournament proper? I remember removing some of those previously. I'm tentatively okay with your additions, as long as:
#It's made clear the four losing quarterfinalists did not play in the tournament proper.
#It's made clear that the players I mentioned above did not participate in the tournament proper.
And please include your sources in the article. Chanheigeorge (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it would be interesting to add quarterfinalists squads. And I agree with Chanheigeorge's criteria: we will need to disanbiguate the articles a little.Let's do this.--Latouffedisco (talk) 09:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I added three players to both Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia that appear to have been unused reserves according to two sources. One(Yug , Cze) and Two(here). My guess is that most other sources do not list the reserves unless they were used. Any other players I added were from the quarterfinals as indicated. Libro0 (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't seem so reliable to me. However, good job. --necronudist (talk) 19:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yugoslavian players are confirmed here and here.--Latouffedisco (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quarterfinals
Talk:Bone Box

message: I've deleted a whole section: Liner notes by Chris Bailey. This is a copyright violation unless a free use licence has been granted. The material was inserted on  04:41, 12 June 2007 by Scando babe see contribs. If a suitable licence is produced then the material should be summarised for brevity.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Liner notes deleted
Talk:Broken Wings: Special Edition

message: :how come the special edition came before the normal one?? isnt it suppose to be backwards? 24.139.117.90 (talk) 02:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: what the hek??
Talk:Ita Wegman

message: Here is what the American Cancer Society has to say about mistletoe today:
"A number of laboratory experiments suggest mistletoe may have the potential to treat cancer, but these results have not yet been reflected in clinical trials. Available evidence from well-designed clinical trials that have studied mistletoe did not support claims that mistletoe could improve length or quality of life."
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Mistletoe.asp
Here is what the National Center for Alternative and Complementary Medicine has to say (keep in mind these people are looking real hard for clinical effects, if there are any):
:"Laboratory studies have found that mistletoe kills cancer cells and stimulates the immune system. The use of mistletoe to treat cancer has been studied in Europe in more than 30 clinical trials. Although improvements in survival or quality of life have been reported, almost all of the trials had major weaknesses in their design that raise doubts about the findings. For example, many of the studies had a small number of participants or did not have a control group. NCCAM is sponsoring a clinical trial of mistletoe, given in combination with the drug gemcitabine, for cancer. The study will look at toxicity, safety, and immune system effects of mistletoe extract when combined with this chemotherapy drug."
http://nccam.nih.gov/health/eurmistletoe/
In other words, it should not be suggested that mistletoe is an effective treatment for cancer. There are no studies showing this, and quite a few suggesting otherwise.DianaW 14:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a large number of studies that support its effectiveness; see Anthroposophic medicine for a long list. Hgilbert (talk) 20:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistletoe

message: The article says she went to medical school and obtained a diploma, so was she a doctor (Dr)? Verbal chat 15:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She was a medical doctor.Hgilbert (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I thought so - I was surprised it wasn't mentioned apart from saying she had a diploma. Are you sure it's an MD though? Verbal chat 18:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

text: The letters are not normally used in continental Europe; this is the English-language equivalent. The Albert Schweitzer article uses "M.D." for Schweitzer, for example, simply to indicate that he was a medical doctor, though he certainly wouldn't have received a degree of that name. I'd be happy to find a better solution. Hgilbert (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's better to be accurate I feel - I know English Dr's (medical) don't like being called MDs. We could just put (Doctor of Medicine). Consultants (Mr's, not Dr's - they're more qualified...) hate it :) Verbal chat 21:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Whatever seems clearest is fine. Hgilbert (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr
Talk:Christmas Time Again

message: Is this really considered a "joke" album? 
If so who considers it as such, the band or fans or who?
Davidac18643 16:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

message: In what way is this a compilation album? It an album of (Christmas) covers but that doesn't make it a compilation - it's not a recycling of previously released Skynyrd songs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.162.158.92 (talk) 23:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilation?
Talk:Fin Garden

message: I removed from the article :Category:55th century BC architecture and obvious copyvio. A peacock claim about the "millennia-old garden" needs solid referencing. --Ghirla-трёп- 14:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Port cities

message: There does not seem to have been any attempt to achieve a consensus on this change to the category definition. It is a very contentious change. If it is required - and I am minded to challenge any such assertion - it needs to be accompanied by category renaming. Can we discuss such changes before they happen please? Frelke 14:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be a more serious issue here. What defines a Port and what defines a city. Because for me Edithburgh is neither. It is a veery small township with a jetty which is used for recreational fishing. So how is a port city defined?  Frelke 20:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. If we need a category for "cities and towns that have a port" (probably most of all the coastal settlements on Earth) then we should ask why?! This is not thought out at all. Are Howth, Dun Laoghaire separate "cities"? Does Bullock Harbour make Dalkey a "city or town"? Belview, a port with no city? (Sarah777 20:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change to definition

message: I saw there were two categories involved.  :Category:Port cities and :Category:Ports and harbours.  I saw from the definition of Ports and Harbors that this was for articles on port infrastructure (not port cities or towns) and for harbors (natural or man-made) (again, not harbor cities or towns).  Most port articles have the name 'port' in them; most harbor articles have the word 'harbor' in them; but it is article content that counts most.  I could see that many articles in the 'ports and harbors' category were not ports or harbors but just about the cities (and yes, towns) that had ports.  So I moved those articles to the port cities categories.  As towns were included (both before and after my changes), I added towns to the category definition for accuracy.  I did not realize any one would be offended with this.  As far as whether WP needs/wants to have categories that include 'port towns', I have no opinion.  If these towns do not belong in the 'port cities' category, just delete the category from the article and the problem is solved.  I do note that some countries do not have legal distinctions between cities and towns and whether a place is called a city or town is just local usage.  Thanks Hmains 02:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I follow your reasoning. Maybe just excluding articles about places with ports (as distinct from ports and harbours per se) from the category ':Category:Ports and harbours' would be simpler? (Sarah777 06:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  my intent
Talk:HTML color names

message: Can someone add a redirect from "HTML colour names" to cope with those of us who use British English. TYIA. 80.229.38.101 14:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Sixteen named colors? This pagehttp://www.ironspider.ca/format_text/fontcolor.htm shows the names of 140 different colors, and how each color looks on the web.
Colors such as:
Peru
Saddlebrown
Crimson
Burlywood
Plum
Tomato
Lime
Salmon
Chartreuse
Indian Red
Spring Green
Goldenrod
Olive
Gold
Rosy Brown
Many of the colors look nice and deserve to be mentioned here; some are too light to easily see, as 
snow and ivory; a few as chocolate and brown are different from what wikipedia says they are. Chocolate looks like a variation of dark orange. brown looks rather reddish.  Jon (talk) 13:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the named colors of the HTML standard in which there were only 16.  I've updated the article to make it more clear.  The "full list" you're probably interested in is on the CSS3 color list which uses the X11 color names. Angelo  05:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Named Colors 

message: As the -Element is nowadays deprecated, shouldn't the example in the first lines be modified? --Azaël (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  font-Element deprecated 

message: Some of the percentages listed in the table are incorrect or misleading. The hex values 80 and C0 do not correspond to percentages of "50%" and "75%". Since FF (255) is 100%, the percentage of "80" is equal to 128/255 which is approximately 50.196%; similarly, "C0" is equal to 192/255 which is approximately 75.294%. In fact, since there is an even number of levels for each of the red, green, or blue, there does not exist any level that is exactly halfway or three-quarters of the way between the lowest and highest levels. A reader seeing a nice fraction like 50% or 75% will likely conclude that it is exact, when it is not, thus it is misleading. Since these percentages are not specified in the HTML specification (it just has the hex values), we should either remove them, or replace them with non-whole percentage approximations. The same applies for the values for hue, saturation, etc. --208.80.119.67 (talk) 03:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red, Green, Blue percentages incorrect
Talk:Edgar Edgar Musikahan

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:AlbumArt (Edgar Edgar Musikahan).jpg, found on :Edgar Edgar Musikahan, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Faye Wong (1997 album)

message: Eiditor said "The album sold better in Taiwan and mainland China than in Hong Kong, which was hit at that time by the Asian financial crisis" without any source
Please provide some reliable sources for it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunguschan (talk • contribs) 14:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that I copied this in June 2007 from the article Faye Wong. It might have been originally contributed there by  or ; we'd have to check the page history. I remember one of them told me he added info that he remembered from Hong Kong newspapers or magazines, but didn't always have a citation at hand. – Fayenatic London 16:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  without any source
Talk:Fear and Bullets

message: Where can you find this album..? - Saskua (talk) 03:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where..?
Talk:Burney Treaty

message: The Burney treaty is properly called the Treaty of Amity and Commerce (Siam–UK), although it needs to be clarified if the treaty was between Siam and the UK, or Siam and the East India Company.--Pawyilee (talk) 08:38, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treaty of Amity and Commerce (Siam–UK)
Talk:Headstrong Special Edition

message: I'm not convinced this is real. It's only been 6 months since it's original release, so it's very unlikely it will have a re-release this September. Plus, why would it have a re-release when Not Like That is still a current single and suddenly is going to be released in November/December 2007. Tcatron565 15:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real
Talk:CZ 452

message: I've read somewhere about the ZKE designation, I'll see if I can find it again.  That would be good information for the article. Angry Christian (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: history question

message: Why do we have the CZ 513 on the CZ 452 page?  It would make sense if this were an article about CZ rimfires but it's not, it's about the 452 line.  Ideas? Comments? Midnight Gardener (talk)
:  I'm not sure?  The 452 (and model 2) to my knowledge has always been the rimfire model released by Brno and now CZ. Kartano (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:I Might Have Been Queen

message: Call me strange, but either Jeanette Obstoj deserves her own page for all the lyrics she's written or she shouldn't have a page at all. Right now her name -- weirdly -- redirects to the Tina Turner song, "I Might Have Been Queen." Patricia Meadows (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeanette Obstoj 

message: There are differences in the last verse, not in the first verse. --Friedolf (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences
Template talk:American film list

message: Will you please stop removing them? If it was just a simple flag of the US then it would be redundant. However it is a specific film icon which is standard across wikipedia in our templates and work templates. PLease stop disrupting. The images in the template are not merely used for decor; they place an industry for which is covered in context and make the pages look more appealing. I've put hours of work into them and I don't appreciate you coming along and removing them because of some generalised "guideline" any old user has written on that page. The "Hollywood" image is instrumental. Wikipedia is devoid of images on film related pages as it is, We don't need editors like you stripping everything bare.   Count Blofeld 10:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing the icons

message: I recently made this template collapsed for convenience of articles. Every article featuring this template is a giant table. Without it collapsed, the template is squished, or an ugly clear needs to be inserted, making the table appear halfway down the page. It is really disgusting. BOVINEBOY2008 23:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapsible?!?
Talk:Inuman Sessions Vol. 1

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:AlbumArt (Inuman Session Vol. 1).jpg, found on :Inuman Sessions Vol. 1, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Leo Lerman

message: For confirmation of this designation, see "On the Town," by Daniel Mendelsohn in The New York Review of Books, Volume 54, Number 13, August 16, 2007, which can be accessed here. fishhead64 22:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lerman's Sexuality

message: Lerman lived with his partner, artist Gray Foy for 47 years at the Osborne in NYC.  After Lerman's death in 1994, Foy continued to live at the apartment until his death at age 90 in 2012.  It seems strange that Foy does not have a wikipedia entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.66.197.7 (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Gray Foy
Talk:I Am the Avalanche

message: This unreferenced article asserts no notability. Furthermore, an editor has been adding links to here from International Air Transport Association. aliasd·U·T 15:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm getting rid of post hardcore from the genres since these guys aren't even hardcore, rather far from. Listen to "Green eyes", "Wasted", "Clean up" and so on, they aren't hardcore at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.65.47 (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Popular culture

message: :Category:Articles with fictioncruft has a few articles that appear to fall under the category of popular culture and seem to be similar to many that have undergone deletion.  Just informing anyone here who can make the effort to seek deletion for these as well. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you mean, to delete the articles that cannot be improved. Deletion is the last resort. DGG (talk) 22:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles to address
Talk:MG7

message: Is it MG7 or MG 7? If there is no clear answer, let's just pick one and stick with it.  Mr.choppers | ✎  15:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Hickory Nut Falls

message: Does anyone know if this waterfall was also once known as Buttermilk Falls?  I read an 1878 newspaper article describing some of the scenery in this area, and it mentioned Chimney Rock, Hickory Nut Gap, and Buttermilk Falls as all being close to one another, but I cannot find any reference to a Buttermilk Falls in North Carolina (though I haven't yet checked Powell's Gazzetteer). Bruce E Baker (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lupin the 3rd Part II season 1

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 

message: I'm confused so maybe somebody who knows better about editing knows about this. The Short Summary isn't showing up despite it being part of the table. The tables look similar to other Wikipedia articles I've seen where the short Summary works so what's going on? Pago95 (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because someone changed the article title recently. If you go through and change every instance of "Lupin the Third Part II (season 1)" to "Lupin the 3rd Part II (season 1)" it should work. Please feel free to do it for the other "seasons" too. Xfansd (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It worked! Thank you so much, I figured it was something like this, but wasn't sure Pago95 (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short Summary not showing up?
Talk:Lupin the 3rd Part II season 2

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 
Talk:Lupin the 3rd Part II season 3

message: It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour contrast problems 