Talk:National Film Awards

message: Started this article and other articles associated with it a while back. Adding to it slowly. If you have any info don't hesitate to add it here. :) Kinda working with a template for each award's article. Want to stick to it. :) Thanking you...
Cookie90 19:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: You are going to need all the help with the number of links you have created!! good luck!
hydkat 13:59, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many links... 

message: <begin>
One thing missing in yourlist of National Film Awards (section) India is the Best Film Critic Award. There are two awards in writing on cinema. One of this is for Best Film Critic and one is for the Best Book on Cinema. I won both awards - the first one in 1991 and the second one (jointly) in 2003. It is awarded in all languages recognized by the Indian constitution and is sometimes accompanied by "commendations"
<end>
please feel free to check and add correctly.. --ti 22:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  added by 219.65.49.149 

message: User:Utcursch has done very hard work on the pages of NFA and changed their style, but I must have disagreed with these edits. In my opinion, the previous version was way better. Apart from it, these new tables are suitable more for filmographies rather than for award pages. The names should remain bold and slanted, whilst the yellow titles in the table are quite good. My main problem is that the new tables are a bit non-notable when they look like this. Best regards, --Shahid • Talk2me 11:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Style

message: I have moved the awards for best film in Konkani and Manipuri to the group 'Languages included in [schedule of the constitution]'.
I have also added links for best film in Bhojpuri, Monpa, and Tulu as awards have been given to :
* Best feature Film in BHOJPURI: KAB HOI GAWNA HAMAR at the 53rd awards
* Best feature Film in MONPA: SONAM at the 53rd awards
* Best feature Film in Tulu: Kotti channaya  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denzil Simoes (talk • contribs) 06:53, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards in various languages 

message: Ppwrong's editing is most disruptive. Rashtrapati Award is a completely different award which is given individually. Directorate of Film Festivals did not even exist in the 1960s, it was established in 1973. Everything he adds is completely untrue, unless reliable sources can be cited to prove it. Everything is very clearly written in a book called "Working Group on National Film Policy". Shahid • Talk2me 18:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ppwrong 

message: I am suggesting to add an image in infobox. --Tito Dutta (Talk) 03:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to add an image in infobox 

message: Any records? Like maximum wins, youngest winner, oldest winner, posthumous wins, wins for debut performance, etc..... -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 20:05, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Records

message: There are some of the awards which were discontinued over the period of time. Some of them were instituted but was not given consistently and then eventually were discontinued e.g. Best Filmstrip (11th National Film Awards) was given only once. Best Newsreel Cameraman was instituted in 1975 and then discontinued in 1983 by awarding only 5 times. Do we need to create separate articles for these discontinued awards or shall we club them together if the award count is less?
Moreover, for the Best Feature Film in each of the languages other than those specified in schedule VIII of the constitution, it has been observed that these are also awarded very inconsistently. e.g. Korborok, Bhojpuri, Gujarati, Kashmiri, Khasi, Bodo, Urdu, Kodava, Tulu, Konkani, Bhojpuri, Monpa, Korborok and Dogri. Shall we create separate pages for each of these language films? Thanks. - VivvtTalk 06:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: On going discussion here. Thanks. - VivvtTalk 00:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued awards 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus.  Calidum Talk To Me 18:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Above you say that NFA would have to move to NFA(d). That's also proposed here. So whats the oppose about? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  am not sure what you meant. Hence pinging you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Just "no advantage" that's all. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: So that's a reason to oppose every PRIMARYTOPIC nominee. And what's the disadvantage? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

text: I don't think its ambiguous. In fact am proposing to make it ambiguous because its an exception covered in WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:48, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

text: But does it fail PRIMARYTOPIC criteria? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
* So how do I clarify it? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure! Am in no rush. But even two years won't be useful if what's needed is not stated. Hence the question to Fortdj33 and maybe you too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What's needed, my opinion, is persuasive argument beyond WP:UCN, aka "COMMONNAME", as this policy section does not address the need nor contents of appended parenthetical disambiguation.   My opinion is that "(India)" is needed, but that the need has nothing to do with how sources (in India) refer to the topic.  Perhaps look at how reliable secondary sources published far outside India refer to this topic.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay thanks! Will hunt accordingly. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

text: *No need to move the title of the article. It is precise and clear this way. Rameshnta909 (talk) 07:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested moves 2 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion