lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Johnson & Johnson

message: Hello  and 
I'm currently working with Johnson & Johnson to making general improvements to the template and article compliant to WP:COI. The content of the template needs reorganization, linking the current articles in the template to the articles in its category. In the past, It has been uncontroversial to make straight forward updates to the template box. I wanted to submit this request for transparency, even if I get the ok to make the edits at a later point. --Chefmikesf (talk) 01:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Jax 0677, I added links to the articles in the template box and removed the photo as you requested.--Chefmikesf (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declaring COI and small updates 

message: Hi User:Chefmikesf, making a new section to focus just on the first part. Janssen Biotech looks current, but neither of the next 2 (Ortho Pharmaceutical and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development) look active and should probably be included in the "former" section. The draft needs to be updated for accuracy before it can be implemented. - Indefensible (talk) 03:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Indefensible, The companies section is updated now. Do you have any input on my Johnson & Johnson Vision comments and questions above?--Chefmikesf (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

text: I removed the Consumer Healthcare section, but the formatting withouth the break codes in the headings pushed all the content to a smaller left column. Were there other changes besides the Consumer Healthcare deletion? — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Well, hat was a bit of a confusing adventure for me in the land of templates. I finally managed the deletion of the Consumer Healthcare sections while maintaining the formatting of the previous headings, but I noticed that your talk page version left out Abiomed from the Acquisitions section. Let me know if that was intentional? — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Grand'mere Eugene I agree, the template code can be finicky, Indefensible and I took a few months to build the initial structure of the Template. Abiomed a great addition to the template box. I can do another study of other articles we can add to the template box now that we cleaned it up. Thanks for your help. --Chefmikesf (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies/Subsidiaries
Talk:Social cataloging application

message: Propose that we rename the aricle social cataloging; the applications are the only instantiation of the concept right now, and in general we should probably write about the broader topics first than the specific instances of them. --Lquilter (talk) 04:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rename

message: The Subject says it all. Zarathustra.Q.Xerxes.III 10:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't forget IMDb and IMDbPro
Talk:American Pygmy

message: The article currently says the binomial is Capra hicus.  If the pygmy is truly a breed of domestic goat, should this not be Capra aegagrus hircus?  Tomertalk 09:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binomial 

message: Why were the pictures taken? <B>Photo</B><B>Nikon</B><B>Man</B> 19:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures? 

message: All or most of this article may be a copyvio, with the exact wording to be found on other websites, some of which appear reputable, others themselves probably copied from this article.  Exploding Boy (talk) 21:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Why is it so impossible to get accurate pictures of real American Pygmies? You site the National Pygmy Goat Association as your source material but continually fail to request and use photos of actual Pygmies. The NPGA Public Relations Board would be so happy to work with Wiki to ensure that accurate information and photos are used. I don’t understand why this is so difficult? 2601:8C1:8281:6E50:4C3E:19AE:7B5B:E7F5 (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: IPv6, if you want to upload images under a free licence that would allow anyone, anywhere, to re-use them for any purpose, not excluding commercial use, then please do so. If you are not the photographer you will probably have to provide evidence of ownership of the copyright. The upload page is here. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Photos being used
Talk:Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre

message: Currently, the title mixes American English and Commonwealth English, so no one is going to be happy about that... Titoxd(?!?) 21:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They may not like it, but after rechecking, that is how the WMO spells it in the third link from the article.  It just proves no one likes a pure compromise.  =)  Thegreatdr 23:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: Why is the spelling in the title different than the spelling in the lead?  ("center" in title versus "centre" in lead) I couldn't seem to figure this out based on the history.  AgnosticAphid talk 18:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Station1 (talk) 07:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  title?  (again) 
Talk:Children's Defense Fund

message: Is "whose name was plagiarized from CDF by the Bush Administration" really consistent with NPOV? To me, the word "plargiarized," even though accurate, makes the article seem less netural. An expression like "borrowed" or even "appropriated" would, in my opinion, be still accurate but more consistent with NPOV.  
Hickoryhillster 16:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Although I published the article on AC, I had done a ton of research into the topic. The source is relevant to the statement made (and even has other things worthy of being included such as the CNN ad buys). Although I wouldn't consider AC an extremely reliable publication source, there isn't really much conflict of interest (yes, I do get paid $1.50 per 1000 pageviews, and no, I haven't gotten that many pageviews for the article). If you disagree, go ahead and remove the link, wouldn't bother me. See alsoWikipedia:NOR#Citing_oneself. Kopf1988 (talk) 01:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: There are only three references, and two aren't NPOV. I am certain that there are many good third-party sources available for this article topic! If I remember, I'll try to find some and incorporate.
--FeralOink (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more NPOV references
Talk:Ramblin' Man (Hank Williams song)

message: I don't understand why it's called "Hank William song" in the title of the article.  NickelShoe (Talk) 16:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't anymore. I encountered some kind of dabatase error trying to move Ramblin' Man (Hank William song) to Ramlin' Man (album), which did not appear in the All Articles listing (I checked first). The article named for the song contained info about a 2005 album compiled from Hank Williams songs. (I know, you're saying I don't remember it right.) When the article got here, it was a 2005 album by Isobel. Whatever broken linkages were in the database seem to be fixed now, except for a strange edit history. Chris the speller 21:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hank William song?

message: I believe that the title should be changed back to "Ramblin' Man (Hank Williams song)." I believe this will differentiate it from the song and album compilation by The Allman Brothers Band, the Lemon Jelly song, the first track from the Steve Martin album Let's Get Small, the movie Concrete Cowboys, the song I'm a Ramblin' Man, by Waylon Jennings, and the song by Laura Marling from the album I Speak Because I Can. If anybody is willing to discuss the issue, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--67.54.187.27 (talk) 01:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the title back?
Talk:Collection (museum)

message: "Another case was the sale of a J. M. W. Turner painting in the collection of Royal Holloway, University of London to the Getty Museum to fund the maintenance of the building, despite the fact that the original benefactor had expressly requested that the collection to be kept intact. "
I have searched and searched for a ref for this -- is there one?  I can't find anything about this particular sale, which makes me think that even if it is true, there must be a better example of this type of deaccessioning. Dina 16:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 comment 

message: The article is currently titled and written with art collections in mind. Much of its content applies to collections more generally, including natural history and technical collections. Would it be better to include such non-artwork collections here or to start new articles on other kinds of collections, and perhaps even a more general one on heritage collections? -- Daniel Mietchen (talk)  00:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My initial response would be to keep all collections under one title. The reasons for collecting can be elusive. That elusiveness is heightened by trying to address commonalities to collecting while illustrating points of departure for different types of collecting. Also the article is brief so I see no compelling reason based on space. A more interesting article results from keeping all collecting under one title. I am partial to art collecting but I think potentially different types of collecting shed light on one another and are thought-provoking when considered together. But maybe others need to weigh in. Bus stop (talk) 01:13, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collections beyond artwork 
Talk:Mirjam Melchers

message: This article does not meet the guidelines for being a stub as per WP:Stub.  Can someone please explain why they think it should still be a stub.  An expand tag would be the appropriate tag --- Skapur 16:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you cut off the achievements sections there's hardly an article on her left. So in my opinion it's a stub. SportsAddicted | discuss 19:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It still does not meet the criteria for a stub.  Maybe section-stub but not a whole article stub --- Skapur 22:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I guess it's one opinion versus another one, anyways, I'm not that much of a trouble maker, so you win ;) SportsAddicted | discuss 19:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?
Talk:Citizens Theatre

message: According to the website, its sign and all publicity material, it is the Citizens Theatre rather than the Citizens'. 86.0.203.120 17:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're thinking of the Panopticon Music Hall, about a mile to the north.FrFintonStack (talk) 13:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The Citizens is well-known as a left-wing/socialist theatre, so a bit surprising that this key fact is absent from the article. Mais oui! (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left-wing politics
Talk:Scott Daniels (ice hockey)

message: Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
   - There are no in-text citations or references listed
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
   - What is present in the article is neutral and does not appear to be bias in any way
Do the links work?
   - After checking the external links for career statistics it appears they are in working condition
Is anything missing that could be added?
   - Background, early life/before professional career, career history and stats are possible ideas 
J.beech96 (talk) 02:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Daniels
Talk:Temple Mountain Ski Area

message: Ski area has been defunct for several years; merge with Temple Mountain?--Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, I have some photos and history that I can post.  It was a notable ski area when it was open.  It'll never reopen, but it will remain known for years to come. Jrclark (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Waterville Valley Resort

message: I oppose the proposed deletion of this article.  Waterville Valley ski resort is one of the principal ski areas in New Hampshire and therefore the entire northeastern United States.  It was previously the site of World Cup ski races.  I would love it if a skier took it upon themselves to expand this article to the level of, say, Cannon Mountain Ski Area or at least Wildcat Mountain Ski Area, with which Waterville is comparable.--Ken Gallager (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion
Talk:Ragged Mountain (New Hampshire)

message: User (now registered as NHguardian, previously referred to as Anonymous user (IPs 47.234.0.59 and 71.181.51.206)) continues to remove external link. No other contributors to this article have objected to inclusion of link, which provides relevant hiking data related to Ragged Mountain, as well as the photo used in the Infobox.  Jrclark (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Whitwell & Reepham railway station

message: About referring to travellers as a different race, the wiki page on travellers states:
Irish Travellers are not considered a separate ethnic group for the purposes of the Race Relations Act Amendment (2000).
--Kevis 17:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This article lacks context. For example, what is a "traveller's site" really? --Apoc2400 09:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: As this site is now scheduled to become an operational railway centre, and potentially the centre of a heritage railway, I am planning to start to bring it in line with the other heritage railway pages for the county. DiverScout (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete page revision
Talk:Jill

message: A "Jill" is a female version of a protective cup in hockey. It might be this slang in other sports as well. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 06:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protective hockey gear 

message: Can a learned person add information about the origin and usage of "Jill"? Giving attention to things such as:
- the article says "Jill" has Latin origins, but what are those Latin origins? 
- Where around the world are Jill, Jillian, Gillian, or any other forms used as a female name? 
- What other usages are there for Jill? JasonHockeyGuy says in the talk above there is "Protective hockey gear", but there are other usages. What about "Jill-of-all-Trades", for example?
I don't know if the following ifo would go on this page or somewhere else, but I'd like to know:
Why do we have a Jack/Jill-of-all-trades, and a John/Jane-Doe of unidentified deceased human bodies? (I assume Jack or Jill are universal because of the kiddy poem "Jack and Jill", while "Jane" sounds similar to "John" and both are common names useful for public anonymity in western societies. But I have no references for these assumption.) Smittee (talk) 11:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range of Use
Talk:Comloșu Mare

message: This article has the wrong title. Please move it to "Cenad". 82.169.138.147 17:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Esther Nisenthal Krinitz

message: Added new 2019 citation material (ISBN9781473687912) as part of WikiProject Women in Red 2019.
Much more work is needed to include other inline citations and I have added the template throughout the text, to support what the embroidery revealed of her experiences and artwork, and also need to update the exhibition news and data since 2013. 
Have not checked the copyright of material that I did not add to the page.
Kaybeesquared (talk) 13:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  new citation added but more work needed 

message: More citations added and some of the NPOV text removed and URLs corrected. There are still some gaps for citations needed, if other editors can assist, thanks. 
Can more experienced editors advise re template 'multiple issues: can it now be removed from current version?
Kaybeesquared (talk) 22:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article updated, more citations
Talk:Tropical Cyclone Warning Center

message: Quite frankly,I don't see how this article could ever be anything more than a stub.There's no major facts about TCWCs that couldn't be found in each's individual article.IMO,this should probably be replaced on the "Tasks" list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNobleSith (talk • contribs) 05:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Class to Stay?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals

message: Hi,
I'm trying to understand the Notability criteria being applied to many short articles such as Military Horseman Identification Badge, Career Counselor Badge, or indeed many of the articles linked off pages such as Badges of the United States Army. These articles tend to have a lead, a "criteria" section and possibly a history section. Typically, the vast majority of references are to an army.mil site ("Army Regulation 670-1, Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia, Chapter 22" is a popular one). The better cited articles might grace you with an article on military.com, Army Times or even a Regimental/Corp Association. The first two being technically private/independent publications but remain in a bit of a grey area as "closely affiliated sources", being highly specialised and relying on good relations with the DoD to maintain access for their writing, which is primarily for service personnel, rather than a wider audience (c.f. say, the NYTimes or "general" news/reportage). Not that specialist sources are bad (e.g. academic journals), but it's a stretch to deem them "significant, independent coverage".
It's maybe a bit of a fait accompli at this point, but this sprawl of - often tiny - articles do not appear to meet WP:GNG, and I would judge as falling into WP:NOTGUIDE or WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Any badge that is issued simply for passing a course (even with distinction) seems unlikely to be Notable. Notable medals are likely to be discretionary honours & awards for valour or unusual service. In many cases, these articles are largely reproducing a couple of Army regulations on eligibility criteria or uniform standards, nothing more. A significant chunk of Parachutist Badge (United States) is listing out the relevant portion of "U.S. Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards".
In some cases there also seems to be a sprawl of articles that should be (at most) one article. For instance, Marksmanship ribbon is the same subject as Marksmanship badges (United States). The fact that the Army and Marine Corp award badges, whilst the Air Force, Navy, Space Force and CoastGuard issue ribbons is neither here nor there. They're all just one subject - awards given to service personnel who have passed their weapon handling qualification with merit/distinction. Service-specific conventions on ribbons/badges/medals do not justify entirely separate articles! Admittedly, Marksmanship badges (United States) also can't decide what it wants to be, since it also covers badges for civilians including Police and NRAoA competition shooter badges. Arguably, the following four articles should really be one article "Marksmanship awards (US Military)".
* Marksmanship Ribbon
* Marksmanship Medal
* Marksmanship badges (United States)
* Marksmanship Device
Potentially Police and NRA badges are then farmed out into a separate article.
Have I completely missed a policy here, or is there starting to be a need to merge some of these articles or keep a cap on the sprawl? Many Thanks! Hemmers (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Badge articles
Talk:Flocculus

message: So, what's a flocculus? XD 81.156.170.223 17:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:The Ruins of Athens

message: Both the German title and its English translation have articles.  The German-titled page gets redirected to the overture-page.  The overture-page has information about the other movements in the incidental music.  DavidRF 17:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now the overture and the set page have been merged together, and the overture page, deleted. Some more info on the movements and on a related composition have also been included. Rctay 11:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Tag Added 

message: I wonder why there is not even a phrase giving the reason this music was composed. "Turkish March" is mentioned 3 times but no editor has had the courage (?) to write a couple of words concerning Beethoven's inspiration and meaning of the work: the total ruination of Athens and the destruction of the Parthenon cause of the Turkish occupation, the elimination of the Greek ideals and extermination attempt of the Greek people by the Turks. "Congratulations"! Hiding the truth even in such a work of art! Disgusting --Φοίνιξ (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:François Englert

message: Article created to provide additional information on science in Belgium. Pvosta 17:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dark Oracle

message: Wasn't this recently aired in the UK on Jetix? 82.18.172.41 17:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uk

message: Not sure about the ins and outs of copyright on wikipedia, but I may have found a copyvio in this article. Section for character bios is taken verbatim from  
Shane Lawrence 06:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Copyvio

message: I'm making a section here with various sources that could be used to improve the article, such as "Developmen" or "Reception". I'd like to improve it in the future, but who know when that'll happen. Otherwise, feel free to use them yourselves. PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Boundary Estate

message: Im trying to find the reason for the name of each house on the Boundry Estate.
Cookham House, Taplow House, Sonning House, Datchett, Henley, etc all appear to be Towns along the River Thames.
Does anyone know, if this is the correct assumption, why these were picked?
81.158.250.64 18:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Arnold Circus is a stub, and is the location of the bandstand in the photo. Kbthompson 18:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't Arnold Circus where all the druggies used to hang out? Colin4C 10:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment mainly street drinkers, but yes. Kbthompson 13:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: "It is, arguably, the world's first council housing." Liverpool Corporation built St Martin's Cottages, 146 flats and maisonettes, in 1869  http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/mol/exhibitions/livingitup/foundations.aspx https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yCQ9AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA62&lpg=PA62&dq=st+martins+cottages+liverpool&source=bl&ots=FvQHeVRjhD&sig=FRLkyUoCdqc0sGZCX4wRNhPeqGg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiSm6bZ9pvQAhUBCCwKHdqzCYM4ChDoAQhLMAk#v=onepage&q=st%20martins%20cottages%20liverpool&f=false
Robocon1 (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice find- can we handle this a different way- I want the reference on the page and think the wording can be easily tweaked. Please re-tweak. --ClemRutter (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  We need a page- St Martin's Cottages have you got more info?  I'll do stub later tonight. --ClemRutter (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First council housing
Talk:$500

message: I Oppose deleting these articles out of process. I can't think of a good, reliable substitute for the information in them. Note that $1 bills are not included--in this case there might be too many countries to list. But high-valued bills are rare, and of interest to numismatists. The list of countries for each bill is small. I say, request deletion formally, and let editors express their ideas instead of you deciding for all of us. For my part, I think all these similar articles should be merged into one page. David Spector 16:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose 

message: Please help this children's home they are dieing of covid 19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gillymoja (talk • contribs) 06:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled