lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samuel Plimsoll

message: the life in early days was same in dolging some heart draking  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.161.239 (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the life in earl days 

message: In your introduction, Wikipedia, you state that my great grandfather was best remembered for "having devised" the Plimsoll line.  This is a common myth.  The honour of coming up with the idea of the line must go to James Hall of Newcastle.  My great grandfather was the Member of Parliament who was so appalled by the number of ships being lost, the state of many of them, the treatment of sailors and their families, that he began to campaign for reform and eventually after a great deal of agitation got the relevant legislation onto the statute books. This of course was no mean feat, and one of which I, and indeed all of my family, are very proud.  By the way, in the process he very nearly brought down Gladstone's government!  Nicolette Jones has recently published a very readable biography of Plimsoll, which I can recommend, although if I may correct one tiny error of hers - she refers to my grandfather as "Professor J H Rose" when he was actually "H J". Daphne Rose 48 (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A common myth about my Great Grandfather, Samuel Plimsoll
Talk:Three Forms of Unity

message: Off the top of my head, I can't remember what place the Synod of Dort had in putting together the Three Forms of Unity. Which means that this article is poorly referenced, and in any case, misleading. 
OK, my CRCNA Pslater Hymnal says that after a careful revision of the text, (but not the contents) of the Belgic Confession, Dort adopted it as a doctrinal standard, but it had already been "adopted by the National Synods in the last three decades of the sixteenth century." The same goes for the Heidelberg Catechism, which was translated into Dutch in 1566.
But I'd like to know where the current text of this article comes from... StAnselm 22:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It came from one of the external links that an anon added and that I replaced. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of the Synod of Dort

message: About the sentence "which reflect the doctrinal concerns of continental Calvinism and are accepted as official statements of doctrine by many of the Reformed churches." -> Is there any source confirming that this applies not just to Dutch but also to e.g. Swiss and Hungarian churches? Marcocapelle (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universal acceptance in contintental Calvinism
Talk:Jock McKeen/Archive

message: I am a first-time editor in Wikipedia.
I object to the two pages I am editing being removed while I am developing them.
Bennet Wong and Jock McKeen (the two pages in question) should not be removed. They are significant figures who deserve to be represented here.
The problem is that I don't know how to make the changes necessary to keep the pages (Jock McKeen and Bennet Wong) alive.
Please send me specific suggestions about how to prevent the deletion of the pages, and I'll get to the editing lickety split.
Thanks
William Meyer 19:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the Wikipedia page WP:NOTE for a good start.  Also read WP:PROD for steps you can take to contest the deletion.  Thomas Dzubin Talk 19:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I have completed the basic text and the references now.  I believe this satisfies the Wikipedia standards for "reliable independent third parties." I will continue to add references and refine the text.
William Meyer 16:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing to Reliable, independent third-parties
Talk:Abby Kelley

message: Deleted statement implying Kelley stopped lecturing after the Civil War started. Earlier in the paragraph, and in the other cited works, Kelley remained an active and controversial speaker after the Civil War.Wkharrisjr (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortuntatley, the reference you cited does not support the statement "She remained an active but controversial lecturer up to the start of the Civil War in 1861." The cited reference only states " Goodheart gives an account of fiery white abolitionist orator Abby Kelley, who "nearly lost her audience when she declared that black men and women were no different from whites under the skin." In the course of the narrative, we learn about Kelley's marriage and future...". Wkharrisjr (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Women's Rights 

message: It seems like she's referred to as Abby Kelley Foster more than Abby Kelley, so perhaps WP:COMMONNAME applies here. If the page is moved  it will need to be edited though, as it currently refers to her as Kelley throughout, which could create confusion. Relinus (talk) 11:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move: Abby Kelley Foster
Talk:Savoy Declaration

message: The text states that the Savoy Declaration of 1658 was so named as it was formulated at the Savoy Palace, with a link to the wikipedia page of the same name. That page describes the burning down of the Savoy Palace in 1381, nearly 300 years before. While the site in London has retained the Savoy name, what reference is there for the Savoy Palace being extant in 1658?
Brunswicknic (talk) 12:34, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savoy Palace in 1658
Talk:Westminster Shorter Catechism

message: I would like to see some reference backing up
"It was, however, later acknowledged that the Shorter Catechism was not suitable for young children or those of a weak capacity. Various other catechisms were created for this purpose, including the Mother's Catechism."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.48.1.109 (talk) 23:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/Collaboration

message: (I guess we better move bird collab talk here...)
Righto, Common Raven is then our first collaboration, right? cheers,  Casliber | talk  |  contribs 18:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think one a month is sufficient at first... Sabine's Sunbird  talk 20:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Get cracking! Template's up, article's chosen, tedious stuff is done. Go for it!Sabine's Sunbird  talk 23:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  A clean up is required at the section Ravens in popular culture. I am bad at cleaning up information which I don't know. Cheers... Luffy487 03:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Statistically we have 9:
4/9 pertain to seabirds
2/9 are flightless
1/9 is a passerine
Gotta run (dinner's ready) - anyone else think of some? cheers,  Casliber | talk  |  contribs 07:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The seabird bias is almost all my fault, I love dem seabirds! Sabine's Sunbird  talk 08:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current bird FAs 

message: How much of that info should we leave there?  I think some of it is actually widely known, but half of it doesn't matter.  Comments? Australian Raven 12:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tricky - most important ones (I guess) would be nth american trickster, norse hugin & munin, shakespeare ref of use of bird, EA Poe and tower of london. Then all the rest on a ravens in pop cult page. 
PS: Lets move this to raven talk page :) cheers,  Casliber | talk  |  contribs 12:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up Ravens in Popular Culture 

message: Shall we make it Bird? Australian Raven 14:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Collaboration? 

message: Is it goint to be Bird migration? Corvus coronoides ContributionsMGo Blue 20:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like. What a relief there's not a tie....cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 21:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Collaboration 5/27? 

message: Congratulations to all involved in getting this article to FA status.Maias 05:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Congratulations! Corvus coronoides ContributionsMGo Blue 19:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Common Raven]] FA

message: I've left a list of substantial articles for folk to whet their teeth on to get to GA or FA. Feel free to add any other largish articles to it or get stuck into them..cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 01:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Standing list of chunky articles

message: Folks, where are you? Is it OK what I did? Because I need some input whether it's alright if I use the "Barbary problem" piece for Barbary Falcon. And if it's altogether OK, I shall integrate the stuff in Peale's Falcon I chucked from the Perry mainpage... and at least content-wise, I think we could just as well home for FA? Dysmorodrepanis 09:03, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Peregrine Falcon]]

message: I've suggested we create a centralized Wikipedia:Biology collaboration of the month for all biology subjects. If interested, please show your support. Richard001 23:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biology collaboration
Talk:EX 41 grenade launcher

message: I made the change to the feeding system as I have a copyrighted right side photo of the EX-41 and it does not use a clip. Given that it does not use a clip it must use a magazine and the most logical and practical place to put the magazine is inside the tube running under the barrel.
:I assume you're referring to Nick Steadman's photo on p. 49 of the Summer 1995 issue of Fighting Firearms.
:First, I think you might be confusing a clip with a detachable box magazine. A clip is usually not visible from the exterior. Some detachable box magazines are not visible either.  For example, the magazine on the FN Special Police Rifle sits flush to the receiver, so a casual observer may think it has an integral box magazine. So it is not obvious from a small black-and-picture that a weapon uses a clip or not. It probably does have a tubular magazine underneath the barrel, but that does not exclude using four-round clips to feed the magazine rapidly, like a speedloader for a shotgun.
:Second, Wikipedia guidelines are to use reliable sources and not original research. Jane's, while it does have errors on occasion, is a reliable source. Looking at a picture and guessing by an absence of features is original research.
:Pettifogger 00:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Feeding System
Talk:Pneumocystis

message: I completed the moving, redirecting and merging of data from several pages, Pneumocystis jiroveci, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia, Pneumocystis, to Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). see Talk:Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) Also see  
Talk:Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumoniaHeliocybe 15:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: Although a separate page for Pneumocystis and P. jirovecii might be appropriate, currently there is not enough difference in history or knowledge to keep them apart. Also, by resurrecting an old version the old errors were re-introduced. Heliocybe (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate pages
Talk:Orinoco crocodile

message: There is no data regarding body mass. If this species’ maximum length is 17 ft (5.2m), how can it be considered as the third largest reptile, considering its mass doesn’t exceed 1,400 pounds according to this article. It falls short in terms of size and mass to American Crocodile, Black Caiman, Leatherback Sea Turtle and also The Gharial. :( Adpr99 (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Body size and mass 

message: To whomever is reading this, hello. This is my first time using the Wikipedia talk page, so bear with me. I believe that one of the images used in this article, specifically https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/86/Crocodylus_intermedius_01.jpg/1920px-Crocodylus_intermedius_01.jpg , is misidentified as an Orinoco Crocodile. I am not an expert herpetologist or anything, but having seen and photographed every recognized species of crocodilian, I believe that the animal pictured here is actually some kind of Caiman, likely the Spectacled caiman . The anatomical features of the animal in this image don't seem to match those of an Orinoco Crocodile. 2601:346:E00:E40:30C7:2A56:F2A2:73DA (talk) 02:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like  has taken care of this. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is my fiirst time using a Wikipedia talk page too so have mercy, but the image is up again. I also noticed the animal is question being a caiman due to the non-presence of the iconic "fourth tooth" jutting out of the lower jaw. Would love to see the image get replaced. Adamgrogory (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially Incorrect Image Used
Talk:Puig

message: In Spain I have always heard "pooch", no matter in Catalan or in Spanish. I does not make sense applying Spanish pronunciation rules to names in languages other than Spanish and in fact nobody does. English names like James or John and Catalan names like Jordi or Joan are never pronounced in Spanish with the "J" spanish sound (more similar to "h" in English) but rather with the original sound in their respective languages.--82.29.15.176 (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish pronunciation?
Talk:Ted Baker

message: Reads like an ad.
You took the words right out of my mouth - I came here to say "It reads like an Ad"  Heenan73 (talk) 10:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on the page content 
Talk:Pneumocystis jirovecii

message: It's named after Jirovec and so adding an "i" makes jiroveci, the only reason carinii has two "i"s is the guys name was carini, also a non-scientific google search of each term yields multifold more results for jioveci over jirovecii... anyone wanna back me to change the article? maybe with proof of how the literature originally wanted to call it?
Scientific namings of species are governed by international codes of nomenclature and not google searches. The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature [ICBN] covers fungi, and Pneumocystis is a fungus.  ICBN says that two "i"s are required in most cases, hence "jirovecii"  and "carinii".  Previously Pneumocystis was thought to be a protozoan and under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature only one "i" was required. That is why "jiroveci" is commonly found in old published papers and web sites. This was explained in Wikipedia already.  Heliocybe (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia says jiroveci has priority since 2005 because of a change in the Code (ICBN), so the actual valid name is jiroveci and the name of the page should be changed to jiroveci (one i).--Miguelferig (talk) 11:18, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I was looking to move the article, but according to this authoritative-looking publication from 2009, "the correct and valid name under ICBN is Pneumocystis jirovecii". It is also spelled this way by NCBI Taxonomy, ITIS Catalogue of Life, and Index Fungorum. I can't find any authorities advocating the single-i spelling. —Pengo 23:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jiroveci or Jirovecii 

message: As per WP:MEDICAL, Wikipedia does not give medical advice. Can someone please change this line in the article so that it isn't written as such:
: Drug of choice is TMP-SMX, pentamidine, or dapsone, make sure to check CD4 Tcell drop below 200.
—Pengo 23:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical advice 

message: Section is needed!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.206.156.72 (talk) 16:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinical significance
Talk:Sylvia's Restaurant of Harlem

message: Ok, I'm kind of torn about this. Because I think the controv is mis characterized.  The controversy isn't exactly about his racism, but his ignorance. it's that he views black culture as rap culture.  In his defense of his statements, he says that he was trying to say that there is no difference between black and white cultures (i can show you the source).  MEANING that what he said can be seen as what he considers all black culture to BE, which many would consider ignorant and/or racist.  My problem is that not all of this is sourced, but if something is so basically logical like this, then what?  I mean you have to proof things in math, but that doesn't extend to the level of 10+90=100.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.172.38 (talk) 09:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: o' reilley controversy

message: *Needs menu and prices :) Towsonu2003 18:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A picture of the food would be nice. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not encyclopedic. Epicgenius (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs 

message: Tagged article, since two-thirds of the article is about Bill O'Reilly rather than about Sylvia's. Balance of article should be restored, one way or the other, such that the article is primarily about its subject. Chubbles (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight 

message: If Southern cuisine can be sourced, I propose adding List of Southern restaurants and :Category:Southern restaurants. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Southern" ?
Talk:Jackson Georges

message: The addition of an info box indicating birth place, date, etc of the individual would be beneficial. Are there any examples of some works by this artist? Citations?  Joeycut (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General questions/suggestions. 
Talk:Alford

message: Why does this page have a "see also" for Alfold, the village in Surrey? 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it has any connection to "Alford" other than sounding alike. If this policy were followed consistently it would lead to a crazy proliferation of links (e.g. this page would also have "see also" links to Halford in Shropshire, Halford in  Warwickshire, etc). Dark Formal 18:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unwarranted link to [[Alfold]]
Talk:Procolophonoid

message: ==Procolophonid or Procolophonoid==
This family is named after "Procolophon". That is because of likeness, not descent. In Greek, -like = -oid; descended = -id. (Think "Anthropoid"; versus "Atreides".) The Wikipedia misspelling has unfortunately propogated on the 'Web, but a glance at the scientific literature shows that the proper (-oid) name is still in use there.
That is why I moved it here.
-- Zimriel 18:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, wait, the proper scientific names are 
*Order (or Suborder) Procolophonia Seeley, 1888
*Superfamily: ProcolophOIdea Seeley, 1888
*Family: ProcolophonIdae Seeley, 1888
The term "Procolophonid" referring to members of the family "Procolophonidae" is scientifically correct. Check scientific sources such as papers available on-line (one example here), and other independant sources such as the taxonomicon 
and palaeos . You should move everything back to what it was before. Thanks. ArthurWeasley 21:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: This family is named after "Procolophon". That is because of likeness, not descent. In Greek, -like = -oid; descended = -id. (Think "Anthropoid"; versus "Atreides".) The Wikipedia misspelling has unfortunately propogated on the 'Web, but a glance at the scientific literature shows that the proper (-oid) name is still in use there.
That is why I moved it here.
-- Zimriel 18:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, wait, the proper scientific names are 
*Order (or Suborder) Procolophonia Seeley, 1888
*Superfamily: ProcolophOIdea Seeley, 1888
*Family: ProcolophonIdae Seeley, 1888
The term "Procolophonid" referring to members of the family "Procolophonidae" is scientifically correct. Check scientific sources such as papers available on-line (one example here), and other independant sources such as the taxonomicon 
and palaeos . You should move everything back to what it was before. Thanks. ArthurWeasley 21:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Procolophonid or Procolophonoid
Talk:Soli Deo gloria

message: I do not argue.
I just want to know.
It would bo good to put response in article, as some other people can have such doubts and mistakes also.
Does not Soli Deo Gloria mean that Glory belongs to God in term that there should not be any worship,  bow down or glory given to graven or painted images of saints, relics etc.?
Does it not also put emphasis that worship and Glory should go only to God, and not even to printed Bible Book {as some else religions express it in form of kissing} ???
Does it not source of Salvation is stated in Solus Christus?
Does not Solus Christus also states that prayer shoudn't be addressed to saints?
I thought it was for them pretty important to put this emphasis to underline contrast to Roman Catholic Church and also to take away worship of human persons {Pope} and offices {bishops}.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.108.17.230 (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theological Meaning 

message: "An opposing view in Catholic ecclesiology is that the Church is Mystici Corporis Christi, the mystical body of Christ, therefore to honour the Church is to honour Jesus himself."
I would like to see a reference for this, and possibly a clarification of the doctrine. Protestants also believe that the Church is the body of Christ according as this Wiki page shows. There should be more clarification on this point or possibly its removal and an addition of a different opposing point.
Msenders (talk) 13:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added links for that, please send donations. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 22:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corpus Christi
Talk:League of Professional System Administrators

message: I submitted a request from board@lopsa.org to ask if I could place the LOPSA logo on this page.  Permission was granted. JSBillings 18:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Hello! On suggestion from Scott Murphy, I have gone through and done the following:
* Checked all external referenced links. I removed a couple that were out of date, and added the final "s" from HTTPS to all that were lacking (a couple did not have this change made due to lack of HTTPS on the remote sites' own pages.
* Updated the membership count. This can be seen in the side panel.
* Updated the list of affiliate organizations, chapters, and related organizations to reflect the current information displayed here.
I'm basically brand new to editing Wikipedia, so please take a spare moment to audit these edits and fix anything I have done wrong.
-- Mark Stenglein (@ocelotsloth)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocelotsloth (talk • contribs) 01:20, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to Links, Chapters, Affiliates, and Membership Size
Talk:List of China Eastern Airlines destinations

message: Destinations in main China Eastern Airlines article are maiking it look too cluttered, thats why this page has been created.
:I've removed the notice for speedy deletion. However, this level of detail is probably way too focused- it would be suffice to sum up the general areas China Eastern Airlines flies in one paragraph.  (See WP:NOT#INFO)). It looks like this article has been deleted before under a different name: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=China_Eastern_Airlines_destinations --Wafulz 21:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: China Eastern Airlines destinations page
Talk:The Illinois

message: I think something needs to be added about the height of each floor because at 1 mile (1610 m) each level would be about 2.155 m tall making each room extremely short by any standard.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.41.106 (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's still unusually short. The Empire State Building seems to be 443/102 = 4.34 m (42% taller) per floor. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled