Talk:Honda D engine

message: The D16Y4 needs to be added to this page, it was in the Australian 96-00 civic gli sedan and hatch, and I believe it is basically the d16y7 with the d16y8 air intake and gearbox.
Hi do D15B1 d15B2 engines have 4 valves per cylinder but a SINGLE over head camshaft? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 
Yes, 4 valves per cylinder, SOHC. ====Burnout420  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.131.7 (talk) 23:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  INCORRECT,  CAN SOMEONE EDIT THIS 

message: The term 'Dizzy' as used here often is an abbreviation of distributor cap. I believe the author is trying to show familiarity with the subject matter whereas it should be a neutral technical/engineering description readable by anyone.
87.198.169.92 (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing style 

message: D13B2 has automatic choke. It was used in the 5th gen Honda Civic (EG3), no 5th gen civic has manual choke. The D13B1 is more likely to have manual choke, since it was used in 4th gen civics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.150.36.186 (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  D13 manual/auto choke 

message: This page used to be in list form and was almost completely comprehensive. Who put it into a table and removed a whole lot of info?
Just to name a few; D16Y1 and D16y4 have been removed, as well as the info on country of use!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.40.29 (talk) 00:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Jerome Potts, who took control over this pages and removed a lot of information. I am also missing the D16Z5 and the D14A1, for example. I have tried to convince him to put the information back without tables, but he would not listen, as you can read above. 77.249.64.160 (talk) 23:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who screwed up this page? 

message: The info on the zc sohc and dohc engines is missing now, the zc was a member of the d series family of engines. also I preferred the old version of this page, but if the current version were cleaned up and completed with ACCURATE info, It would be acceptable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.175.70.58 (talk) 02:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  zc engine 

message: there was another version of the d15b, it was a nonvtec jdm dual carb version of the d15b2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.175.70.58 (talk) 02:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  d15b 

message: I note that after recent edits, all citations are now removed. Please, add them back. Otherwise, I would have no choice but to revert your edits. On another note, I found it strange that D16B8D16B5 is said to produce 185hp of power and 160ft·lbf of torque. Please provide a reliable source. Thank you. ---North wiki (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a lot of bunk here. I notice that most troubles seem to be a result of this edit, but I am currently not able to repair this in a proper fashion. Nonetheless, please refrain from undoing further, possibly useful, edits until I or someone else can get around to incorporate whatever has been useful in recent edits. Additionally, why is this page so plagued by anonymous and often confused editors?  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 07:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Mr.choppers, This edit was done by me to revert the article to it's former state without tables, just like all the other Honda engine pages on here. You can read the discussion about tables with Jerome Potts above. He removed a lot of valuable information. Now that information is back and although it is not always backed up with a citation, most of it is correct and usefull. 77.248.73.52 (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Hi. But I'm still uncomfortable to let the info about D16B8D16B5 appear to be fact. I temporarily remove it till more info can be found. Thanks. ---North wiki (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are there so many volatile anonymous editors for this poor article?  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, whoever wrote that probably got confused with the b16. It says "used in civic GX"... GX is the CNG or compressed natural gas variant! It is a known fact that a certain engine reduces its power output when transformed to natural gas. NO WAY it makes 185 hp. In this forum they post some info that looks better, but as it is a forum we can't cite it. http://honda-tech.com/showthread.php?t=2904339 . If posible check it in honda manuals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.47.67.169 (talk) 23:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: It seems this page has mixed info about D14Z4 and D14A4. Also, the D14A4 (old version of D14Z4) Is not listed, except in a note below (about intake difference in europe). 
More info: http://www.hondagranturismo.it/articoli_tecnici/codici_motore.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.139.28 (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That may very well be. This page is plagued by anonymous, confused, and often thoughtless editors who will happily change things around based on unfounded notions of theirs. It may actually be one of the worst articles in Wikipedia. I don't know what to do to make it better since repeated requests to permanently block anon editors have been turned down. Sorry.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 07:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  D14Z4 section is wrong 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Honda D engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405134421/http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/honda/civic_ferio/1997_8/12509/ to http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/honda/civic_ferio/1997_8/12509/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405134435/http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/honda/domani/1997_1/12866/ to http://english.auto.vl.ru/catalog/honda/domani/1997_1/12866/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426010959/http://gooparts.com/shop/s4201550/p4201550D60001087969.html to http://gooparts.com/shop/s4201550/p4201550D60001087969.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Are there any plans to add an infobox for this article? RVandres (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Made some updates to the D15A2 specifically for the HF/DX versions as there are version differences within the HF version that were not made clear as well as expanded more on the DX version.
Specifically1986 Honda CRX/SI Service Manual page 3-9:
* Added the 3 different transmissions that are found for the HF (49 state, Hi Altitude, and California versions), as well as added the DX transmission ratios.
* completed the compressions ratio, redline, valvetrain, and induction methods for the HF/DX engines.
Cmdrscotty (talk) 04:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  D15A2 version updated 

message: You keep reverting Honda D engine. Provide a dependable source as per WP:RS and I will be happy to discuss this with you. Until you do, stop adding your own opinions to the page or you will be blocked. Thanks,  Mr.choppers | ✎  04:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: PakWheels is entirely undependable and appears to be user generated. Please read WP:RS. Note that a few months ago, PakWheels claimed 105hp for this model and a top speed of 220km/h. Today PakWheels claims 115hp and the even more unlikely top speed of 240km/h. It's not a good source. I suggest finding a period Honda brochure or manual.  Mr.choppers | ✎  21:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: PakWheels never claimed 105 hp for the the 7th Gen civic EXi D15Y3 the 2001 to 2006 model it is 115 hp the one you are talking about is the 6 th Gen civic EXi D15Z4 that comes with 105 hp which they correctly state and also by top speed they mean the total speed on the speedometer 6 th gen civic in Pakistan comes with upto 220 km/h and 7 th gen comes with upto 240 km/h the power figures are correct their are also other sources in Pakistan claiming the same specs like gari.pk and  vehiclebaba.com if you search for this vehicle. Mrinformer12 (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither states the engine type, and neither matches what Honda Pakistan themselves stated. Both links clearly show 7th gen Civics, neither indicate model year.  Mr.choppers | ✎  13:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes because they have mismatched the information about these variants 6th gen civic EXI with D15Z4 non vtec comes with 105 hp @6800 rpm and 133 nm torque @5200 rpm the 7 th gen civic EXi with D15Y3 non vtec comes with 115 hp @6200 rpm and 142 nm torque @4700 rpm the power figures are correctly stated just mis matched to the wrong Gens of these civic. Mrinformer12 (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mismatched and with other errors (top speed is not the number on the speedometer); you just proved why this is not a good source. What makes you believe that PakWheels is more dependable than the people who actually built and sold the car? They are clearly error prone.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes i get what you are saying there are many errors but what you are not understanding is that the power figures they are showing is correct the D15Z4 non vtec engine belongs to 6 th gen Honda Civic EXi which came in Pakistan from 1996 to 2000 that engine produced max 105 hp @6800 rpm and 133 nm torque @5200 rpm and D15Y3 non vtec engine belongs to the the 7 th gen Honda Civic EXi which was launched in Pakistan from 2001 to 2006 which made basic horsepower of 110 @5800 rpm and maximum hp of 115 @6200 rpm with basic torque ranging from 135 nm to its maximum produced torque of 142nm @4700 rpm the  Pakistan Honda Atlas link is only showing the 7 th gen Civic EXis basic hp and torque not its maximum. Mrinformer12 (talk) 20:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Many errors is precisely why it cannot be used as a reference. What is "basic hp and torque not its maximum?" This is patent nonsense.  Mr.choppers | ✎  21:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civic in Pakistan 

message: Is PakWheels or Honda of Pakistan to be trusted for power output of D15Y3 engine?  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Honda Pakistan As per the period spec sheet from Honda Atlas Cars (Pakistan) Limited, the car produces 110PS (metric horsepower). User:Mrinformer12 has been changing this to a range of numbers from 117 to 120 PS. After a few requests for referencing, they found a source which states 115 PS. One problem is that the exact same PakWheels page stated 105PS for the same, apparently seventh generation Civic when archived a few months back, while also listing entirely fictive top speeds of 220 and 240 km/h. PakWheels, IMHO, is not a particularly dependable source as per this alone. The source also does not state which years the data pertains to, and also never states the engine code in question. In light of this, I believe that Honda Cars of Pakistan is to be trusted over the unconfirmed and fluctuating numbers found at PakWheels. The Honda Pakistan reference also meets the requirements of WP:PRIMARY.  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  For me the issue is non-technical - PakWheels gives differing information at different times (see links above), and also neither defines the years that the information concerns nor does it include the engine number - which is what is being referenced. Thanks,  Mr.choppers | ✎  11:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Which reference to trust for Pakistani market Honda Civic

message: — Assignment last updated by Victor7000433 (talk) 18:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Environment and Justice