lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Evoked potential

message: Similar to the discussion in Talk:Visual_evoked_potential, can the "In neurophysiology" phrase be removed from the opening sentence? Edwardian 04:18, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good argument. No protests. I'll do it. Lova Falk (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Introductory sentence

message: The article currently suggests that EEG and evoked potentials are completely unrelated. My understanding is that evoked potentials are a component of the EEG. In other words, the EEG is a mix of (a) the evoked potential, (b) spontaneous/ongoing/"background" activity, (c) misc. other things, (d) possibly interactions between the aforementioned components. The article should at least reflect that the EP is a part of the EEG. Dontaskme 22:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Both components are in the EEG, if you mean the actual voltages on the skalp, but the displayed measement results are distinct: You (usually) can't see the EP in a display of EEG traces as it is so much smaller, and you can't see the (background) EEG in an EP display as it averages out.  I'll try to clarify this in the article. --Pjacobi 08:17, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant exactly what you are saying. An EP usually cannot be identified in an EEG trace, but it's nevertheless hidden in there (and can be extracted through averaging of multiple trials). Dontaskme 18:41, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate the talk, but you should write info in the article, not in the talk page. Yoiu17 06:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EEG includes EPs 

message: I think there are links to several pages with subtopics that possibly do not merit their own pages until expanded sufficiently. Kpmiyapuram 13:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subtopics with separate pages 

message: Would a section on the diagnosis of MS be appropriate here? Jobonki (talk) 17:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A section on EP applications would be good, IMO, and in there, the application of the transient VEP for MS diagnosis should be mentioned. Strasburger (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Sclerosis?
Talk:NASCAR 2005: Chase for the Cup

message: I removed most of the paragraph in this particular sub-section.  Not only was the content untrue (you cannot run the high line effectively in this game), but it also included an inaccurate list of NASCAR-sanctioned tracks which are constructed with progressive banking.  The paragraph listed Darlington Raceway, Dover International Speedway, and Chicagoland Speedway among those with progressive banking; none of these are in that category.  As of April, 2010, the only NASCAR Sprint Cup Series tracks which have progressive banking are Homestead-Miami Speedway, Bristol Motor Speedway, and Las Vegas Motor Speedway.  New Hampshire International Speedway has a form of it, but lowest groove's banking is so low that it is rare for the drivers to race on that portion of the track.Kp.murphy (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism Section - "Running the High Groove"
Talk:Lake Washington School District

message: My source for enrollment figures is LWSD's Enrollment Report. Ak13 04:26, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The school mascot for the Lake Washington High School is the Kangs not the kangaroos.  At least the school and it's player recognize the school's teams as the kangs.
See I told you so 168.99.197.188 18:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Washington High School mascot 

message: Why is a single private, religious school listed on this page? There are a number of other private schools within the district's boundaries. Probably, this page should list none of them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.98.16 (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Schools 
Talk:Jesuit missions in China

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=RtsDAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA108#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kuoofra (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesuit artillery 

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=oQ8BFk9K0ToC&pg=PA437#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=zERymZzBQQYC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false
In 1617, china suspects catholic missionaries of being portuguese and accuse them of spreading heretical doctrines
http://epress.nus.edu.sg/msl/entry/3254
Rajmaan (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1606 conspiracy invasion involving the jesuits and portuguese 

message: "While some Jesuit fathers managed to impress Manchu commanders with a display of western science of ecclesiastical finery and to be politely invited to join the new order . . ."
Shouldn't "of" be regarded as a typo for "or" in the sentence above?
204.57.79.78 (talk) 17:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   Typo in First Sentence of "Dynastic Change" Section? 
Talk:Frank (Squeeze album)

message: "Forced to take offers from different major labels for the first time in their career, the band soon signed with Reprise Records and began working on their next studio album, Play."  How is this relevant to Frank, and if it is in the slightest, why would be it be in the lead section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewkirkPlaza (talk • contribs) 00:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference to Play 
Talk:United States Army Veterinary Corps

message: Rather than a redirect, this is now a full-blown article. Valerius Tygart (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Own article now

message: This page was created as a redirect to Army Medical Department (United States) to provide a single point for articles on each of the AMEDD Corps to develop to the point of achieving independent article status.  If you would like to contribute to an article on this branch, please do so at AMEDD.  Thanks.  --Mddake 04:47, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page in support of AMEDD Article
Talk:Ridiculous (album)

message: *Can I suggest that we ignore this message from the bot and keep all the discussion here on this talk page? PamD (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the bot sections, and collapsed this one. PPdd (talk) 18:58, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Collapsed bot section

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ridiculous (general use) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Dental Corps (United States Army)

message: This page was created as a redirect to Army Medical Department (United States) to provide a single point for articles on each of the AMEDD Corps to develop to the point of achieving independent article status.  If you would like to contribute to an article on this branch, please do so at AMEDD.  Thanks.  --Mddake 04:48, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page in support of AMEDD Article
Talk:Medical Service Corps (U.S. Army)

message: This page was created as a redirect to Army Medical Department (United States) to provide a single point for articles on each of the AMEDD Corps to develop to the point of achieving independent article status.  If you would like to contribute to an article on this branch, please do so at AMEDD.  Thanks.  --Mddake 04:49, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page in support of AMEDD Article
Talk:Army Medical Specialist Corps (United States)

message: This page was created as a redirect to Army Medical Department (United States) to provide a single point for articles on each of the AMEDD Corps to develop to the point of achieving independent article status.  If you would like to contribute to an article on this branch, please do so at AMEDD.  Thanks.  --Mddake 04:51, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page in support of AMEDD Article
Talk:AMSC

message: This page was created as a redirect to Army Medical Department (United States) to provide a single point for articles on each of the AMEDD Corps to develop to the point of achieving independent article status.  If you would like to contribute to an article on this branch, please do so at AMEDD.  Thanks.  --Mddake 04:49, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This page in support of AMEDD Article
Talk:Clemson Area Transit

message: Should some of these claims (ie most ridership, etc.) be backed up somehow?  -- I don't see anything about it on the official website.
Jayc 05:03, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
Where did the vomit comet reference come from? I can't find it anywhere.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.187.8 (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a recent change in the CAT bus routes for the 2008 school year. I believe it is called the Tiger route. The new route was put in place in order to cut back on the CAT bus budget. There was a recent article in The Tiger about it. There may be a way to look that up online. So if someone could include the recent updated route to this acticle that would be great. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PCakes150 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Route?
Talk:Herbes de Provence

message: I've never seen a Herbes de Provence without Oregano. Could this be because I'm not French? njaard 00:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregano 

message: Obviously I don't know much about this blend of herbs. Including where to look to buy it. Is it found in the local supermarket? Do you blend it yourself? This information would be helpful.
Evan Chaney (talk) 04:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to buy 

message: The article states "there is no guarantee that any herb mixture on the market actually comes from Provence".  I was under the impression that herbs de Provence was not intended as a reference to seasonings that had been grown in Provence as much as a characteristic blend of seasonings that was commonly used in cooking in that region, regardless of where they had been grown.  If that is the case, then that paragraph should probably be reworded to reflect that.SirenDrake (talk) 22:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location Discussion 

message: The article currently claims that American HDP mixes contain lavender. While this may be true (I'm not American) it needs a ref, especially as it seems a bizarre ingredient. In addition, if the claim is true, an explanation of the origins of this practice would be helpful. --Ef80 (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding it. ɱ (talk) · vbm  · coi) 16:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good rewrite. --Ef80 (talk) 19:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

text: Appreciated information. 2603:8081:7A01:5DF8:2994:4149:7BD4:97E (talk) 01:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lavender
Talk:Constantine IX Monomachos

message: I'd like to know the source for the name 'Irene' for the daughter of Constantine IX. This Monomachina is buried at the Kiev Pechersk Lavra, and on her tomb her name is given as 'Anastasia'. Missi 05:10, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a family name...probably some ancestor single-handedly killed a bunch of people in battle, or something like that. Adam Bishop 15:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Μονομάχος, literally meaning something like 'single-fighter' or 'single comabattant', would imply a 'champion'; someone who steps out of the battle-line to challenge the enemy to produce their champoin for single-combat, before the fighting becomes general. Such champions are mentioned repeatedly in the wars of Justinian I and reasonably often in later Byzantine history. Presumably, an ancestor of Constantine had fought in single combat and the name then became hereditary. A mention of the meaning of the name would be a useful addition to the article. Urselius (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Monomachii also were a type of late circensic gladiators, which fought single combats aside other monomachii doing the same. A.f.a.i.k. said monomachii were expected to lay off fighting after their bout and retire to their quarters. This takes nothing away from Urselius knowledgable comment - I just wanted to point out, that there were additional meanings of the word Μονομάχος. 
In this articles context Μονομάχος certainly pertains to the military tradition, because byzantine historians reported on several feats in single combat by some of the herakleidic(?) emperors. 2A02:8071:2184:2400:843F:9216:7CDD:4020 (talk) 18:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article has several uncited sentences, which would be an obstacle to promotion to GA (and Milhist B-class). Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 08:15, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited sentences
Talk:Várpalota

message: This article had link to King Mathias, a fictional character related to LEGO building blocks.  I believe that it should be Matthias Corvinus of Hungary instead.  I changed the link here and posted a comment on that talk page of that article.  If my link is not appropriate, I trust that someone will further improve it.  Thanks.  --Mddake 05:35, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to King Mathias or King Matthias?
Talk:Rayman: Hoodlums' Revenge

message: There, how'd I do on cleanup? This thing was a mess, so I tried to help out. Hope I did a good job. --68.229.103.250 05:42, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not.  Because it's basically the same plot as Rayman 3 told again in a shoddy game like this, it's about as canon as the TV series was, therefore it's a spin off. --82.4.77.68 (talk) 12:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Electrical breakdown

message: I'd like to see a discussion of 'dielectric' or 'voltage' stress, specifically methods for calculating.  Seems to be missing in this and related articles.  One equation I found (that I have not been able to verify or complete is:  "This configuration is mathematically expressed as E = (K)2(V)/-(d)ln(D/k2d), where E, again, is the voltage stress, D is the outside diameter of the wire in mils, d is the average conductor diameter in mils, V is the voltage, and k, and k2, are proportionality constant that depends on conductor standing and size."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.28.2.42 (talk) 18:34, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
Alternately, it may refer to the application of current to a gas.
Can anyone tell me what this sentence is supposed to mean before i attempt to modify it?Light current 05:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dielectric Stress

message: Could we have something about striae  please from somebody who, unlike me, knows what they are talking about? Cutler 23:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Striae 

message: Should there be something in the article about glow discharge, at least a link to the "Electric glow discharge" article? 74.13.185.122 (talk) 01:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glow discharge 

message: So, it seems to me that this page should be merged with the page entitled Breakdown Voltage.
Any seconds?
98.237.253.233 (talk) 07:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I have made some contributions to the section mechanism and I apologize for my poor English. Someone is asked to polish it up.
D. May Germany 6/8/2015  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.128.96.60 (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New contributions 

message: This recent revision added incorrect and uncited information, most alarmingly claiming that ozone is non-toxic (it is not). I'm reverting this, though I've also noticed that the entire section lacks any citations even besides this contribution. I'm a bit of a noob at editing Wikipedia so I don't know how to flag it, so I'll leave it for someone who knows what they're doing. 69.120.67.207 (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting incorrect additions to subsection "Ozone generation" 

message: There is a wikipedia article about "Paschen's law" which can be linked in the "voltage-current" section.  Also, the "gamma" in the formula is not defined here.  If I remembered how to do these edits, I would. 3piecesuits (talk) 00:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pashen Law Formula
Talk:Early flight

message: This article seems to be duplicating (a) the first flying machine article which deals with controversy over early flying machines and (b) the list of early flying machines. Furthermore IMO it is inappropriately named because it deals with early mechanical flight rather than, as one might suppose, pterosaurs, Archaeopteryx and the like. Perhaps it should be merged into the first two named articles. Nurg 06:22, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In the third section of the table, there is a header, "Post E.O.Y. 1903". What does that mean? Freekee 03:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: EOY?

message: I have added a division into different era's after the tables.
Let's see what other editors of this article think of that.
(Roger J.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.249.177.39 (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text after the tables

message: Enrico Forlanini's helicopter had a steam engine and was unmanned but in 1877 it rose to a height of 13 meters (40 feet) for 20 seconds. I think it is an important milestone that should be added to this article
Link and references:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Forlanini  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altes2009 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forlanini's helicopter 

message: As the subject articles are all about human flight, then I propose that all three articles be merged to form one, titled Early Flying Machines. No need for a list as the exizting tables are fairly comp[rehensive and easily editted in the future. As this has been under discussion (without much response, if any), then i shall attempt the task[and get villified again for not discussing somehting that nobody wants to discuss]Petebutt (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early flying Machines 

message: This article has been merged with:- List of early flying machines and First flying machine to form Early flying machines. Petebutt (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Tiling puzzle

message: This page was apparently deleted in the wake of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Karlscherer3, in early July 2005.
However, this page was not explicitly listed on that VfD page, nor was there a VfD notice placed on it.
Looking at Google, it seems that "tiling puzzle" is a legitimate term that is indeed in use (some Google hits are old pre-deletion Wikipedia mirrors, but many are not).  So it seems that deleting this particular page was an overreaction, and it was not in any case part of the VfD.
In this case, it seems a simple solution just to delete the zillions-of-games spam link section and leave a perfectly legitimate article in its place. -- Curps 06:24, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Rich Man, Poor Man (novel)

message: How about splitting this article into one about the book and one about the miniseries? Especially since they went their seperate ways after the first season, with the second season not being based on the second book.
АГА АГА АГА АГА АГА АГА АГА ЛОЛ  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.76.189.142 (talk) 18:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  split 

message: Hmm... Iordache is actually a not uncommon Romanian name. I wonder if Irwin Shaw deliberately picked a linguistically improbable name to ensure there could be no real German American with that name who could frivolously sue him for libel. (His contemporary Leon Uris used similar tricks in QB VII and later.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.230.148.64 (talk) 06:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordache or Iordache is actually a Romanian name
Talk:String puzzle

message: This article was not listed in Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Karlscherer3, so deleting it was an overreaction not sanctioned by the VfD.
As for Tiling puzzle, Google shows the term "string puzzle" to be in widespread generic use.  The same principle applies here as for copyvio articles: if an article is copyvio, it can be removed but a non-copyvio article can be created in its place.  Similarly a non-spam article can be created here (actually, the pre-deletion version of this article did not contain spam links to zillions-of-games.com).  If there is a generic term in widespread use (as demonstrated by Google), we cannot let a spammer decide for us that there can never be a Wikipedia article on this apparently quite legitimate topic. -- Curps 06:51, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Michigan (album)

message: Is it true that the official title is "Michigan"?  I bought it from iTunes and the full title "Greetings from Michigan - The Great Lake State" is listed as the title.  Who determines the "official" title?66.108.105.34 01:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check Talk:Sufjan Stevens/Archive1. --Gika 15:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone should make this page similar to the page for his album Illinois.  With all the thematic and historical topics covered. - --Cmedley 21:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions to this page 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Gpollock 06:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Michigan (album)}}
Talk:Seven Swans

message: I have searched thoroughly for sources that may lend credibility to the biblical references cited to no avail, so I've taken the liberty of deleting the ones that were more subjective or could be debated. inggrid 04:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone got a citation for that? Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)WIKIPROJECT ATHLETICS NEEDS YOU! 12:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bible references
Talk:Enjoy Your Rabbit

message: This is definately not a folk rock album in any conventional sense.  ^_^  Despite Sufan's normal style, this one is more electronic.  --Starwed 06:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that it has more in common with Fourtet than anything else. --Eptin 03:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Sun Came

message: Is that the regular cover?--CoastTOcoast533 03:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: Amsreddevil (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release year 

message: The DIscogs page for the release shows that the track was not added until the re-release in 2004, and a Pitchfork review of the 2004 reissue states that 3 bonus tracks had been added since the original release, while this WIkipedia page only lists tracks 20 and 21 as bonus tracks. Taylowrk (talk) 16:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think 'Satan's Saxophones' is a bonus track