Talk:Jacobson v. United States

message: I believe this article to be complete and comprehensive enough for GA status. There is only issue I can imagine someone having: the absence of images, which is not unusual in articles about court cases. I have some ideas which I will try to implement whenever I feel this article is ready for an FA nom, but for GA I think it can pass without images. (There are also some other law review articles about the decision's impact that I will be trying to get).
If there are any concerns, let me know. Daniel Case 17:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article nomination notes

message: I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of June 13, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Yep, easy to read and does a good job of using prose to explain fairly complex legal issues.
:2. Factually accurate?: very attentively cited
:3. Broad in coverage?: very thorough.  Some sections could possibly even be shortened
:4. Neutral point of view?: does a good job of presenting both sides
:5. Article stability? yep
:6. Images?: a lack of images does not disqualify an article from GA status
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. 
— JayHenry 02:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,Ruslik 07:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review &mdash; kept

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jacobson v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621083325/http://www.law.fsu.edu/Journals/lawreview/downloads/253/lord.pdf to http://www.law.fsu.edu/Journals/lawreview/downloads/253/lord.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jacobson v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080312234634/http://www.usdoj.gov/olp/fbiundercover.pdf to http://www.usdoj.gov/olp/fbiundercover.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jacobson v. United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929111006/http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Academic_edu/CAF/civil-liberty/kiddie-porn to https://www.eff.org/Censorship/Academic_edu/CAF/civil-liberty/kiddie-porn
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article says "Neither Jacobson nor Comfort made any more explicit reference to pornographic materials and Jacobson stopped writing back after two letters." That is the first reference to Comfort. Comfort is not introduced in the article. The article then reference him (or her) three other times.
Who is Comfort?
Jeffrey Walton  (talk) 04:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See the "investigation and arrest of Keith Jacobson" subsection for the first reference: "But some time later, Calvin Comfort, a 'prohibited mailing specialist' for the region, found Jacobson's name in another file" Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Comfort ?