lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:George Dundas (Royal Navy officer)

message: The article presently says that Dundas appears in the novels of Patrick O'Brian. However in the list of recurring characters in the Aubrey–Maturin series he is described as son of Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville and brother of Robert Dundas, 2nd Viscount Melville - which of course this Dundas wasn't. I've never read any of the novels, so is the character that appears in them a) this George Heneage Dundas, and his relationship to the Dundases of Melville is wrongly identified, or b) a fictional Heneage Dundas, and nothing to do with the subject of this article? Opera hat (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They were distantly related. Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville was son of Robert Dundas, Lord Arniston, son of Robert Dundas, son of Sir James Dundas of Arniston, son of Sir James Dundas of Arniston, son of George Dundas 17th of Dundas, son of Sir James Dundas 16th of Dundas, son of Sir William Dundas 15th of Dundas, son of John Dundas 14th of Dundas, son of Sir Archibald Dundas 13th of Dundas, son of Sir James Dundas 11th of Dundas, who was also father of Alexander Dundas of Fingask, father of Alexander Dundas of Fingask, father of Alexander Dundas of Fingask, father of Archibald Dundas of Fingask, father of Archibald Dundas of Fingask, father of Sir John Dundas of Fingask, father of John Dundas of Fingask, father of Thomas Dundas, father of Thomas Dundas of Fingask, father of Sir Lawrence Dundas, 1st Baronet, father of Thomas Dundas, 1st Baron Dundas, father of George Heneage Dundas. Opera hat (talk) 11:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

text: A bit of both, possibly. He originally appears in Master and Commander presumably as himself, as the commander of Calpe after the battle of Algeciras (and he later appears as the Captain of Edinburgh in Treason's Harbour). But in Post Captain (the second book), he has become the son of the First Lord - I would guess it's not a mistake on O'Brian's part so much as a coincidence of names that he found too good to resist, but I don't know how you'd prove or disprove that. 94.173.16.196 (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick O'Brian 
Talk:WMAC

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a school is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the school. - Dravecky (talk) 23:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: Gut 2600:1005:B026:163F:1D4B:606F:4836:7394 (talk) 00:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are you not on the air after 9am in the morning.???
Talk:Wolfgang Fritz Haug

message: Hey folks, I haven't read Haug in a dog's age.  Any help here would be super.  I just cut and pasted 95% of this from cultural marxism, where it was misplaced.  I definitely think Haug is deserving of a page, but it's going to require some contribs from other editors. --Smilo Don 02:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haven't read Haug in 15 years! Help, please
Talk:Tony Wright (sleep deprivation)

message: Doesn't really present his hypothesis fairly, not including, say, any criticism or dubiousness about his claims. Titanium Dragon (talk) 11:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues

message: Mr. Wright is notable for his purported sleep-deprivation record, not his theories about it. Anyone wanting to learn about them can follow the links. Perhaps they deserve a line or two, but not more than (say) 10 percent of the article -- and definitely not a wide majority of it. --tgeller (talk) 15:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Majority of article not relevant to his notability

message: The article seems to missing a pertinent piece of information - namely, how long he actually went without sleep for? It's implied that it's between 264 and 276 hours but couldn't it do with being specified? 212.9.31.12 (talk) 07:31, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 266 hours. --Bejnar (talk) 18:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long did he stay awake for? 

message: The following unverified paragraph was removed from the article on 31 December 2013.
::Despite such a young proposal, his theories have received support from various researchers in the fields of neurology, anthropology, and psychology; attracting researchers such as Colin Groves, Dennis McKenna, Robert Greenway, and many others.
If you have a source or sources that support this statement, it or an appropriately supported version of it may be readded. --Bejnar (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support for theories 

message: Why is this an article? -  theWOLFchild 19:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wha ?
Talk:WLZN

message: The file :File:WLZN Blazin92.3 logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free former logo being used in a :WP:DECORATIVE manner in a section of former logos in :WLZN#Previous logo which fails :WP:NFCC#8 and :WP:NFG. Non-free former logos can be used as long as their use complies with :WP:NFC#cite_note-4 and this almost always means the logo itself about the logo and the associated change in brandling that led to its replacement is the subject of sourced critical commentary. Simply adding the logo to "show" what it looks like is not considered sufficient to satisfy :WP:NFC#CS, except in cases where the logo is being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of an article about the organization the logo represents.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on .
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:WLZN Blazin92.3 logo.png]]
Talk:St. Anne's Church, Warsaw

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Gerard de Zeeuw

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed one or more section of this article for now. 
I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.
-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 
Talk:George R. D. Goulet

message: The Book Listings link is just temporarily unavailable due to a strike by the staff of the Vancouver Public Library. Please don't remove John McDG 21:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse/Mmbabies

message: I wish I'd said this a long time ago, but ... Please don't call any phone number posted by Mmbabies. And don't post the results of your "sleuthing" in regards to where the owner of whatever phone number lives. Keep in mind that the number(s) likely don't belong to Mmbabies, and even if they do that does not give you license to actually call them. That is telephone harassment, which is a federal offense here in the United States. szyslak (t) 11:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; no need to get innocent people snared in. It's just like the bus driver situation, they don't care about what we're doing here, so just revert the number and move on. Nate • (chatter) 11:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Seconded -- if we see a phone number in one of the posts, we delete it or reverse the page. If the page (especially a talk page) has been locked from further editing, we let the locking editor know. It's the higher escelons that should do the legal gruntwork, not us editors. As for phone numbers in general, I should say it's off limits, regardless of who we are -- we're here to maintain an encyclopedia, not become detectives, or even Nixon wannabees. -- azumanga (talk) 23:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, will do. Postoak (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phone numbers 

message: User:GO-PCHS-NJROTC stated here that he had contacted the Better Business Bureau, of which AT&T is a member, about Mmbabies. He wrote: "voice mail was received on my cell phone stating that they have taken the appropriate action and that this would not be happening again". The vandalism has stopped. I wonder what happened? I guess they cut of his internet connection? - Face 18:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened? 

message: A heads up for everyone who followed Mmbabies: I saw this edit [] tonight whose edit summary reminds me of our "friend". Not reverting since I can't verify the veracity of what was posted. -- Gridlock Joe (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not 100% certain, but looks likely.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible return
Talk:Bakugan Battle Brawlers

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :An old friend. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 28#An old friend until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "An old friend" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Should there be an article about Bakugan (as the franchise as a whole) at Bakugan (currently a redirect to Bakugan Battle Brawlers)? JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 14:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a topic at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga to see if anyone there cares to weigh in.  ― Synpath 23:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franchise as a whole 

message: The redirect Bakugan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 13:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bakugan]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Traci Des Jardins

message: Not sure how to work this into the article (it might be useful for description of Jardiniere and about her rformer partner, the designer): Justin Phillips, "For San Francisco restaurants, Jardiniere’s closure signals the end of an era", San Francisco Chronicle, April 27, 2019. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jardiniere closing
Talk:Shaggy Flores

message: --Noopinonada (talk) 02:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

message: You can go to www.shaggyflores.com for references to this article. Article was posted by the actual person who the article is about. Please remove from deletion status as the information provided is correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.160.135.249 (talk • contribs) 
:What's needed are references to reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  Also, autobiographies are strongly disouraged.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a provider of free web space. --Finngall talk 21:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned up the images a bit--I replaced the caricature in the infobox with a proper photo, deleted the low-res Flickr image, and moved the rest to the gallery.  There's more cleanup to be done, but I'll leave it alone from here on.  Take care. --Finngall talk 19:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I have been cleaning up various pages relating to Afro-Puerto Ricans.  First off, the fact that this gentleman has an article on Wikipedia dedicated to him (by himself, apparently) is questionable.  He is not that noteworthy.  Next, he is not Afro-Puerto Rican.  A bit of black ancestry, as is common in the Carribbean, does not make one Afro-Puerto Rican.  The racist "one-drop rule" is just that, racism.  If we follow that line of thinking, the majority of Puerto Rico would be simply black, which is an outrageous assertion.  It is great that you are in touch with your black ancestor, but ignoring the rest of your ancestry is a bit childish and disingenuous.  Afro-Puerto Ricans are blacks from Puerto Rico.  Flores is not black, so I am deleting this reference. --Noopinonada (talk) 04:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afro-Puerto Rican 

message: The author of this page, upon examination of the discussion page, is Shaggy Flores himself.  While Shaggy Flores may have other websites (including his own site) referring to his poetry or his minor published works, this article in Wikipedia obviously, for all intents and purposes, seves only as a beacon to advertise Shaggy Flores.  For reference, see the relevant sections where Flores discusses that he is pursuing a masters and what not.  It reads like an autobiography, it reeks of self-advertisement, and the subject of the article is quite low on the notoriety/noteworthy scale.  Mr. Flores, Wikipedia is not an avenue for self-adulation.  I've visited your website and it does the trick as far as advertising you.  I am sticking with my proposal for deletion.  Hopefully you will realize that this is an encyclopedia and not a forum for you to self-aggrandize.  Furthermore, you ridiculous inclusion of yourself as "Afro-Puerto Rican" only furthers suspicion that you have some sort of agenda here.  I will push (fairly, unless you feel unable to stoop down to discuss yourself here) for deletion of this page.--Noopinonada (talk) 02:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Category talk:Death in art

message: the Stations of the Cross here because, it's art and it's about death, for sure. Einar Carptrash (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some more precise stuff - there are too many categories in this area. Johnbod (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we include
Talk:Guilty pleasure

message: Allright, so to start with the first reference. It's a watchmojo video. I mean, what authority does watchmojo have? Not that we need any confirmation on this subject but I suggest we remove the reference because the reference has no value. The second reference leads to a non-existing page, the third could be good but I don't see why you would put it up there and the fourth reference is from "today".com.
And most of all; why would you put a reference on barely half of the things you listed? That's even more ridiculous.
Ciao. BeefDaeRoastLXG praat 15:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Can anyone supply any information as to how guilt comes into play here? 67.82.9.213 (talk) 22:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Guilty that you could be devoting your time to something better?68.117.218.247 (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF?
Talk:Trevor Rhone

message: Where was he bor Sammy boo (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trevor Rhone  

message: A prostitute is a person who offers sexual intercourse in return for payment  Sammy boo (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  prostitute  
Talk:Trevor Sorbie

message: Please do not use this article to add paragraphs of information regarding Trevor Sorbie's various hair products and other promotional material. You could add a brief sourced mention of his salons and notable media appearances, but this page does not exist for individual's affilated with Sorbie to add promotional material to. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional edits
Talk:Triumvir monetalis

message: I can find no authority that suggests the English word Money derives from the title Monetalis.  Rather, the concensus seems to be that "Money" derives, through French, from the Latin word Moneta, which is likely also the source of this title. Jimtrue (talk) 13:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The content of this page consists of two things: 
1) a definition which is much more fully dealt with on the Moneyer page (also see Roman Republican currency)
2) a statement about the origin of the English word money which is not quite correct. The accepted etymnology is described in the page on the Temple of Juno Moneta
The Triumvir Monetalis should simply redirect to Moneyer as Tresviri monetalis does currently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curtius (talk • contribs) 19:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove page 

message: You mentioned above that during Caesar's dictatorship the number increased to four. Do you have a source for that? I'd like to add it to the article. Ifly6 (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I ended rewriting most of it. I will add more when I have the time. T8612 (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a good rewrite, I'll do some copyediting if I have some time.  Ifly6 (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

text:  Could you expand as to what you mean by ? Also, do we have images for the coins mentioned in the passage ? It might be a nice illustration for that shift. Ifly6 (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four moneyers 

message: Sorry to constantly be pinging you! I did a few copy-edits on this article and put in some more section headings with a lede expansion (along with reference form normalisation). I have a bit of feedback on content as well:
* Perhaps some expansion might be worthwhile on how specifically . The paragraph before only discusses a C Fundanius' 101 BC coin, then jumps twenty years to Sulla. That's a pretty large leap! Marius wasn't in power the whole time there.
* There seems to be a contradiction (though I guess the word "portrait" means it gets a pass) between the claim that C Fundanius's 101 BC coin was  and the claim that coins minted in 44 were . Perhaps clarification is worthwhile?
* On Caesar's portrait: do we have a picture of those first portrait coins?
These contributions look great! Ifly6 (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I will expand. Fundanius' coin pictured Marius but only from afar, so the coin did not break too many rules at once. Caesar put his portrait on the coins like an Hellenistic ruler. Caesar's discussed coin is the top picture, but the other moneyers that year also made a similar denarius with his portrait. T8612 (talk) 10:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments
Talk:Troy Boyle

message: This entire page is unsourced and thus ripe for deletion. I happen to know that the organization is real, but I am unable to find significant, reliable third-party information on it. Here are two insufficiently informative items from which one could make a start.
Atheists face uphill climb with new political party
Atheists in Politics: A Report on the National Atheist Party Annual Convention
--Cherlin (talk) 04:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP unsourced

message: There is a report at Daily Kos, which is a political advocacy site, not an independent source of information, that Boyle has resigned as President of NAP. It gives no links to either a reliable third-party source or to any information on the Party's Web site. A Google search turns up no such information. Boyle's page on the site has been removed without explanation or any sort of announcement.--Cherlin (talk) 04:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Resignation

message: I'm tagging because of this. I'm also going to be tagging for inaccuracy, as the article is at variance with , indicating that it is substantially inaccurate and leaves out important facts. What a mess. Coretheapple (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rectified the above two issues and tagged for the remaining problems. Coretheapple (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Close paraphrase
Talk:Carioca Aqueduct

message: The structure reminds me of Rostokino Aqueduct, for some reason. --Ghirla-трёп- 22:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Carmen Sandiego

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.
Thank u Lilfoot8787 (talk) 07:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Carmensandiego}}]]

message: I'm not sure as to why Lauren Elliott specifically is shown as the creator of the franchise, when as the franchise and series pages explain, it was the result of a team at Broderbund. In fact, I think Broderbund used to credit four people (Lauren and three I've forgotten) as the joint creators. Wouldn't it make more sense to remove him from the title, and instead have a "People" section within the template listing him and other key people in the franchise's history, such as the Carlstons, Rita Moreno, and Gina Rodriguez?
On another topic, I don't think "New Carmen Adventure" is an appropriate abbreviation for that game's title. It's a tagline rather than a title unto itself. It's regrettable that the game was never released with a subtitle in English, but it could be listed as "World (2009)," as "Mystère au bout du monde," or as the English translation, "Mystery at the End of the World." HarashoEli (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, why do North Dakota and Japan say "(spin-off)"? They are official games, and though they weren't part of the canon (for lack of a better term) at the time, the canon of Carmen games has changed so much over time based on what is or isn't in print that I don't think that should matter now. HarashoEli (talk) 20:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  People and titles 

message: Is this even necessary? It was fine before, with all the Broderbund games together rather than trying to separate them by "era."HarashoEli (talk) 05:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broderbund split
Talk:Taiyō-class escort carrier

message: Maybe you could specify somewhere that these are not to be confused with the Japanese aircraft carrier Taihō. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, ghod only knows how I can't keep  and  straight my own self.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion