Talk:List of The Boondocks characters

message: does anyone know what the soul song that robert freeman has playing in his scenes sometimes? I can think of two eps, home alone after the boondocks theme, and thank you for not snitching when gin rummy and ed start up robert's car  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 
80.195.5.222 (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The page that this text was copied from is getting too large, so splitting the characters sections off from The Boondocks (TV series)#Main characters and The Boondocks (TV series)#One-time characters seems like a good idea.
Please see discussion at Talk:The Boondocks (TV series)#Characters page.  Thanks, Clicketyclack 10:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed split

message: Can anyone connect the voice actors with the characters of the show (besides the very few that are listed).  That would be useful info. τßōиЄ2001 23:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice actors

message: I think that all proposed Merges should happen, wouldn't that make the most sense?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.110.239.150 (talk) 22:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What other quotes in pop culture reference him besides the one obscure reference from WWE SmackDown? I honestly don't think any characters outside the main should have their own article, and I don't see how A Pimp Named Slickback is that notable. There's plenty of people who have never heard of him and probably never will. Aside from that, there's far too many quotes in his article, and they're basically all profanity-laced. That's not encyclopedic material in my opinion. --Antoshi~! T | C 21:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the mergers. The pages stand on their own.J'onn J'onzz (talk) 16:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted a redirect of Ed Wuncler III and Gin Rummy to this article made by Some Other Editor without comment … I don't believe that there was a consensus to redirect any of them, regardless of their already having a section in this article … aside from that procedural issue, I have no opinion either way on the mergers. Happy Editing! —  03:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

text: No merger There is no reason to merge the articles. They all have there own purpose and they have made reappearances.Mcelite (talk) 04:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that there has been a  on  since April, 2008, so I added a  to this article for completeness … I'm starting to lean towards the "merge/redirect" of these articles since the current paragraphs about these characters in the article appear to be sufficient, given their lack of "real world notability" … if this is the consensus, then the  template should also be edited to remove them. — 141.156.175.125 (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, after the "merge/redirect" the navbox has to be modified. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As usual, DGG makes some convincing arguments … I have no objection to the "merge/redirect" with all five articles, so long as (a) the  tags are removed, and (b) they are also removed from . — 141.156.175.125 (talk) 01:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rollo Goodlove took care of one of them … what about the others? — 141.156.175.125 (talk) 10:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Merge remaining Lovely characters, all of them, but I don't see need for them to be split apart due to WP:SIZE, and I don't see much in the way of notability outside of the work itself.  I'd go into more detail, but as was said, DGG has already done a fine job of making the point. -Verdatum (talk) 14:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge or delete all unreferenced characters. As per WP:Verifiability "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Freikorp (talk) 14:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mergers?

message: rollo goodlove's first appearance was the s-word, not the hunger strike  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.79.152.9 (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rollo Goodlove

message: From what I've seen, one-time characters are not include in "list of ... characters" articles.  It is more appropriate to describe them in the individual episode summaries.  I believe they can all be deleted. -Verdatum (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  One time characters 

message: I suggest that Thugnificent/ Otis be moved into the "other major characters" (or whatever the second group is) section or at the very least have Rummy moved down into other characters (the third group). The Eds, specifically Ed Sr. could be moved their as well. Rummy has never had an episode about him, Ed Sr. is just a secondary character in the few episodes he appears in and Ed III is regularly just a secondary character. Thugnificent has had two or three episodes about him and is a regular character. I don't feel comfortable making the decision, but if people they can do the moving or show approval and I'll do it.
Also, Ms. Van Hausen (IDK how to spell her name) has appeared in quite a few episodes and I believe she should get a small mention.--141.149.173.214 (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Characters Around/ Add Character 

message: The Lamilton Taeshawn character is actually based on a real 7 year-old that stole his grandmother's car, the kids name is Latarian Milton with news cast videos of the event quoted lifted word for word in the episode. Should be some kind of mention of this but not sure where it can be placed as he has only been on one episode so far.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcqOgnQyXp4  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.147.126 (talk) 01:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamilton