Talk:Audience response

message: There seems to be a constant trickle of contributors adding pictures of hardware ARS devices. I'd like to open a discussion about the most appropriate devices to show.  I would nominate the following: 1) Consensor, for historical context 2) Interwrite PRS, as the first widely adopted PRS and the readily recognizable example of IR 3) TurningPoint ResponseCard, the product which first showcased card-thickness miniaturization and led to their widely-cited growth and position as the current market share leader 4) The IML Connector, for being the product which can objectively shown to have the most advanced features. I'm open to a Reply Systems image given their market share and progress in the turnkey channel. If a definitive resource is necessary, we could turn to the publicly available analyses published by Futuresource. Jvyduna (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Product Images

message: I think it would be interesting to compile a set of most popular brands and features of each particular clicker. For now, it seems that the article is too abstract. --IlyaV (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brands

message: Anyone heard of a blue tooth ARS system? --DennisDaniels (talk) 00:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bluetooth

message: Anyone come across descriptions of how to build your own ARS? Thanks.--DennisDaniels (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DIY

message: This article is desperately missing a criticism section. Clickers are just awful. It is shameful that professors require students to purchase them. I don't need interactive gadgets to learn.Aikaterinē (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be overlooking the incredible overhead of administrative tasks that teachers are required to perform as well as the very real problem of gathering useful information from students in an effective manner. Try teaching a three months of classes to 100+ students and see how well you're A) able to first know the students and B) provide any real feedback on their performance.--71.135.129.218 (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism?

message: Another commercial link was removed Feb 10, 2009.  Once again Wikipedia's policy on external links is:
"Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam."
-- comment added by Longcall911 (talk • contribs)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial Links II

message: The focus of this page is hardware audience response, and includes photographs, of several branded hardware objects and only one tiny screen shot of a web based product.  I'd like to see us break out software/cloud based only solutions for a discussion of their history, and the tradeoffs between the two.  It's confusing for readers to conflate hardware with audience response since they are no longer synonymous.  Fozzable (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The final paragraph of the history section broaches this topic (re "no longer synonymous"; re "run what ya brung"), but no doubt more coverage should evolve in this article as the field advances. — ¾-10 02:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software/Cloud Based Audience Response 

message: I did some due dilligence, and cannot find anywhere else reference to "Audience Studies Institute" - Journal articles like http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144008002068 just ref. back to the Wikipedia page. Brand page http://meetingsupport.org/files/Turning%20Technologies%20ARS%20ROI%20Whitepaper%20(1).pdf cites Chronicle of Higher Education http://chronicle.com/article/Classroom-Clickersthe/6009 which gives no citation or source. Meanwhile, I cannot find any independent confirmation that such a company even existed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.241.198 (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Audience Response 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Audience response. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130429063505/http://www.bing.com:80/politics/stateoftheunion to http://www.bing.com/politics/stateoftheunion
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified