lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rotwelsch

message: ==Other cants==
*Argot (France)
*Cant (Great Britain)
*Lunfardo (Argentina)
* I removed this section because it was incomplete (only had 3 items) and its contents were already linked to via the Category:Cant languages.
*If it is still thought useful to have such a list shouldn't it be complete?  And then maintenance becomes the issue: which is why the category solution is best :) IMHO RCEberwein 15:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other cants

message: link to http://linguistik.yauh.de/rotwelsch.html is broken
217.85.78.133 21:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: as criminal language seems a little bit odd. A Gauner isn't per se a criminal, but somebody who isn't to be trusted - a potential criminal maybe, but more of an individual with a distinctive level of streetsmarts. He's also a traveller - not bound to land or a common family with all its ties - and earns his living by a variety of dealings, which are everything else than opaque for the average citizen. In short: every criminal could be called a Gauner to some degree, yet not all Gauners will become criminals. A successfull (by which I mean: real) Gauner won't even break the law of the land. Maybe a good comparison is the english con-artist?
I know my comment lacks a better translation, but the word itself is scarcely used nowadays in a non-euphemistic or non-reminiscent manner. Perhaps rogues-langue? --78.52.34.110 (talk) 12:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the translation to "crook," as that's the translation used on Wiktionary. -- 2600:1700:F901:430:55C3:7849:F673:CA8E (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  the translation of ''Gaunersprache''  

message: What is written in Hebrew alphabet as purportedly "Kochemer"  in the form of "חוכמער" is wrong. 
It could be only rendered as Chukmer or maybe Chokamar or something like that, since "ח" is the letter "chet" (with a rasp fricative CH as in some dialetcs of German, not as in English affricate "ch" as in "church") and "כ" is "kaf".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.95.254 (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purported Yiddish
Talk:G. B. Samuelson

message: I don't know if anyone is watching this page. I am wondering if Christine Diwell gave permission for her article to be placed here. However, she is a well respected and knowledgeable Local Historian  & Secretary of The Isleworth Society, and so I think there is a very good chance that she would agree if approached properly. Christine may also then, mention WP to the other members who would be a very good source of information from this region of Britain. They have a contact page. http://www.isleworthsociety.ik.com/enquiry/home.ikml--Aspro (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Until and unless someone demonstrates that it's here with permission, I've removed it from the article.  It's in the edit history if someone determines that it's kosher or wants to use it as a source. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tempest (Denning novel)

message: It -seemed- to be wordage taken directly from the back of the book but I cannot confirm that at the moment because I lost my copy. So I took what was confirmed in the marketing speak present, mixed in a bit of boldness and recollection and rewrote the whole danged thing in what I hope is a more appropiate tone and style for Wikipedia. Lots42 (talk) 22:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I rewrote the plot section 
Talk:Exile (Star Wars novel)

message: Could someone update this page?, I would  cept I'm not good with wiki  formatting Polziper 03:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm pretty sure the plot synopsis is a copyright violation. Lots42 (talk) 15:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And months later, I rewrote it just to be safe. Lots42 (talk) 06:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: @Lots42, thank you. I believe you were correct.  Dswitz10734 (talk) 12:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis
Talk:Vector Prime

message: The 'Death' section is most original research. It should be compressed to a sentence or two. Lots42 (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Section 

message: The Chewbacca section of the article says that they received a list of characters that they weren't allowed to kill off and Chewbacca was not on it, so they decided to kill him off that way, but it also says that George Lucas requested them to kill off Chewbacca directly. Which is it?!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.179.133.201 (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Lucas 

message: I renamed section "Death of Chewbacca" to "Controversy". Any other spoiler-free title would be fine with me. Of course it must be expected of a Wikipedia article to tell what happens in the novel, but I find it a bit harsh to flash this one to the reader's face as item #2 of the table of contents. --Rinaku (t · c) 17:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler
Talk:Dark Tide: Ruin

message: Since it had no source - obviously, it's a Wikipedian's effort, thus WP:OR. 198.84.253.202 (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary removed
Talk:Charles Frohman

message: A few months ago, some extensive edits by an anon editor were reverted, apparently based on the high POV quotient of the content.  However it appears to contain quite a bit of information, which might be verified and readded to the article. - JasonAQuest (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV info source

message: An editor added the following, without any citation: "He was also the mentor of Broadway producer Charles Dillingham (1868-1934), who was probably also at some point Frohman's lover."  The editor also added that Frohman was a homosexual.
:Hello.  What is your reference(s) for this information?  Please see WP:RS and WP:V.  You may be correct, but it is essential to give a reference for this information.  Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That Frohman and Dillingham were close friends, and he helped Dillingham professionally is confirmed in Charles Frohman: Manager and Man.  A little googling easily confirms that they lived together, and this source refers to it as a "same-sex domestic partnership". -Jason A. Quest (talk) 02:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dillingham
Talk:Numerical diffusion

message: The picture doesn't seem to be referenced in the text or have any other context. Is its relevance something that should be obvious to a practioner (in which case it might be nice to explain it for non-experts) or on the other hand is it uncaptioned because nobody can actually tell what it is supposed to represent? 81.57.230.211 (talk) 08:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Daytona Beach Bandshell

message: "The other structures in the boardwalk area are a clock tower, kiosk, concession facilities, restrooms, subway entrances (now closed), and an elevated walk from Earl to Ora Streets.[3]"
what 'subway entrance' is this referring to? I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean a train station but I can't figure out what it does mean. Bracewell94 (talk) 13:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  other structures
Talk:Tamo daleko

message: Typical revisionist bullshit. Tamo daleko was never banned. Ethnic folk songs were explicitly *encouraged* in the SFRY. 2620:15C:6:16:69A2:2EF5:5512:8381 (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not banned 

message: this is a traditional croatian folk song that was adopted and revised to suit serbian expansonist ideology!  here are the original lyrics:  
Tamo daleko, daleko kraj mora,
tamo je selo moje, tamo je ljubav moja.
Hajdemo, dušo, da sretno živimo mi,
jer mladost prolazi žurno i taj život nesretni.
Tamo daleko, gdje cvijeću nema kraj,
tamo je selo moje, tamo je vječiti raj.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.92.130 (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The croatian Hymn is a serbian song, but people still count it for original croatian (being a hymn).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.33.19.46 (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  not serbian song 

message: The song you have listed as the "original" isn't the original as it starts with the lyrics "Zar je morala doc" which is a different song composed around the same time. Today the two songs are usually sung together as one, alternating verses from each. But the two have different melodies and lyrics. I believe the 2nd version you have listed may be the original, but I'll have to check my sources, anyway it's certainly older than the one listed now as original.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.155.2 (talk) 00:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Original Version" not the original 
Talk:Blue Harvest (Star Wars)

message: It seems to me that "Blue Harvest" is an allusion to Red Harvest, which was unofficially remade into Yojimbo, which every knows was a big influence on Lucas while making Star Wars. Think this should be added? Or too OR?--SeizureDog (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Allusion to "Red Harvest"?

message: It is said in the article that a certain amount of merchandise sporting the Blue Harvest logo was produced back in the day. It would be very interesting to see such an item at the top of the article. Anyone have a picture they'd be willing to share? Thanks!
--Boboboum (talk) 18:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?
Talk:Bipyridine

message: I propose to move a lot of this material to a new page entitled 2,2'-bipyridine, which would be enhanced. My thinking is that we will have a ton of material on the 2,2' isomer which would make finding info on other isomers difficult.  Also the ChemBox is impossible if we need to list data for all six isomers.  In a sense the current bipyridine page would become a disambiguation site, with notes on all isomers.  Eventually it is likely that someone will create a 4,4'-bipyridine article (there is already paraquat)..  Please leave comments here if you object or have views on my proposal.--Smokefoot 16:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done see 2,2'-bipyridine.  If you have any advice or comments, please let me know.--Smokefoot 04:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New article on 2,2'-bipy
Talk:Da BackWudz

message: yo this page should be taken down until enough information can be gethered to actually make an article--Lil' Infamous (talk) 00:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trash It 

message: It's been a while since the last album, and I was wondering, has anybody heard of a new album coming out anytime soon? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.148.177.179 (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New album? 

message: Did my best to cleanup the article, but it still needs to be updated.Vanishingcattle (talk) 03:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: this article  has no references ,
no  relieble source for verification ,
 there is no evidence of Notability on this article .
therefore the article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines  Samat lib (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Error
Template talk:Citroën timeline 1990 to date

message: The 2CV was absolutely not a city car.Hektor 16:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it is rather a "people's car", an inexpensive small car or something like that. It doesn't fit modern classifications since its design is actually very old, the same as the Beetle. The addition of a Early Citroën vehicles timeline would be very helpful to establish a consensus on the 2CV's classification. -- NaBUru38 22:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category for the 2CV?

message: *GSA - Length, 4190 mm, Width, 1610 mm,
*Xsara - 4167 x 1698 
*Golf 4.2/1.76 -- Hektor
:The Peugeot 306 (a small family car) is just under 4000 mm long, and the Peugeot 207 (a supermini) has a length just over 4000 mm. The Vokswagen Golf Mk I has a length of 3700 mm and the Mk V is 4200 mm long; and all its generations are small family cars. You should compare the length of a car against similar casrs of the same time, not against current models.
:The Ford Cortina Mk III was 4270 mm long and the Renault 12 4345 mm long, and they are heirs of the current Mondeo and Laguna respectively. So I think they are pretty close to the GS / GSA.
:And please use the "Show preview" button instead of saving twenty edits in only half an hour. -- NaBUru38 15:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GSA as small family car

message: You edited the timeline because the Citroën BX was discontinued in 1994, when the Xantia was made available in 1993. The 2CV was produced until 1989; as no direct replacement was produced, its bar goes until that date. But many other models were discontinued after their replacements were on sale; however, that is not as important as the release date. The Clio II is still in production, both the Renault timeline correctly shows the Clio III when it was actually made available. I hope you understand that what we are showing with the timelines it the newest models in a certain year, not the oldest. -- NaBUru38 20:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production start and end 

message: What happened to the city car category? The C1 is regarded at such. Yet, now it is included in the supermini category. Which is wrong. BaboneCar (talk) 19:06, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed that. There are many other errors, though. For example, current models are not shown as still being produced; old Mehari not on the same line as new Mehari, etc. This template needs attention from an expert. — JFG talk 02:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected what I found. Another pair of eyes to double-check would be welcome. — JFG talk 04:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  City car category 

message: I would advocate starting this template in 1990, and moving the 1980s models to the previous timeline (making it 1950–1989 instead of 1950–1979). That split would provide more continuity, as many legacy models stopped production in the late 1980s. It's really weird to still see the Dyane, Visa, Méhari and GSA on a "modern Citroën" timeline. — JFG talk 02:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , looks more consistent that way. — JFG talk 04:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start in 1990?
Talk:Carmel Winery

message: Small winery owned by Carmel. NN enough to have seperate article. --Shuki (talk) 14:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge Yatir into Carmel 
Talk:Susceptance

message: In this page it has the line:
Note: The susceptance is not the inverse of the reactance.
whereas the reactance page says that it is (it calls it the reciprocal, but that means the same thing (I even checked!)), in the 'See Also' section.  Which is right?  I think this one probably is, but that's just from a glance - I haven't studied complex numbers in much detail yet.                        --Smin0 16:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also have trouble believing this. Can the original contributer explain? Orrcam 13:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the original contributer, but I can help clear things up. The susceptance is not directly the inverse of the reactance. That is, simply taking the reactance and inverting the value would yield an invalid result. These are complex numbers and so the inverse must be applied to the whole complex number. Once applied, the resulting imaginary portion of the complex number would be the susceptance. 70.80.201.172 15:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, so something with impedance of 3-4j Ω has reactance of -4Ω.  It has admittance of 0.12+0.16j S, and so susceptance of 0.16S which is not the reciprocal of -4.  Does this mean the sign also changes, i.e. that capacitors have positive susceptance? --Rumping (talk) 02:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, you're right. It looks like the page has been updated to reflect that -X/(R^2 + X^2) = -X/(|Z|^2) TimSmit (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Rhum Barbancourt

message: THIS (STUFF) IS SO DAMN GOOD —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:209.89.37.202 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 8 October 2006
:Why yes, yes it is! RevelationDirect (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion

message: Is it true that Canada has prohibited Rhum Barbancourt due to high levels of the chemical ethyl carbamate? Badagnani (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's available at the British Columbia Liquor Store, so I doubt it's been banned at least at the federal level. Zelse81 (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is absolutely no evidence to support this claim. However, this seems to be a potential problem for spirits made from fruit (however not necessarily specific to Canada). See: Food Industries Manual Christopher G J Baker, M.D. Ranken, R.C. Kill  Hope this helps in some way. Cheers! Savvyjack23 (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethyl carbamate
Talk:Manfrotto Group

message: That was quick. There are some articles on aircraft that the project for it hasn't even tagged yet. PPGMD 16:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Wikiproject 

message: I read the company profile pages on both Manfrotto's site and Bogen's site and neither says that Bogen is owned by Manfrotto, as this article alleges.  My understanding is that Bogen is the exclusive distributor of Manfrotto's products in the US, but I see no evidence of any other relationship.  --rogerd 22:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vitec owns Bogen AND Manfrotto (and Kata, and Gitzo, etc.) Bogen Imaging is the US distributor for Vitec's lines. 198.77.206.228 (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Duely cited now. -- Ratarsed (talk) 13:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manfrotto owns Bogen?
Talk:Quebec Autoroute 19

message: Isn't Gouin part of the Henri-Bourassa interchange? I was sure there's an on ramp southwards, and an off ramp northwards 70.51.10.130 14:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Gouin Boulevard]]

message: The Athanase David Bridge was named for Athanase David Peter Horn User talk 12:49, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athanase David Bridge
Talk:James Crichton

message: Would someone who knows please clarify whether Crichton's name is pronounced cry-ton or critch-ton?
Snezzy (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Very odd German names and comments in the starter section. Anyone have any idea how this should read? Rosser Gruffydd 11:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Tibetan sovereignty debate

message: , I have reverted your WP:UNDUE WP:POV additions made in the recent days. Please note that Wikipedia is written by summarising mainly WP:SECONDARY sources. Adding material from WP:PRIMARY sources to buttress a particular WP:POV is prohibited. You have made rather too many edits to take them apart. So blanket reversion is the only possible course at this time. You are welcome to reinstate edits based contemporary WP:SECONDARY sources, keeping in mind that this is a highly contentious  topic, and a strict adherence to WP:NPOV is required. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I, without hesitation, reverted all your removals as you failed, on talk page, to list in details, one by one, which items fall under the category of primary sources and you even removed the optimized referencing i added regarding the Tang-Tibetan relation in the first paragraph. Per: wp:vandalism. MainBody (talk) 10:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  See WP:ONUS and WP:VNOTSUFF. You are now WP:edit warring. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

text: yes what MainBody is doing is unfortunate. I am tempted to restore the status quo until we can come to an agreement. As currently there is a real issue with WP:NPOV Kunga1776 (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNDUE POV additions
Wikipedia talk:Cluocracy

message: Is this a made up word? Why that word? HighInBC 16:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cluocracy

message: Holy crap, enough of the pointless essays. -- Ned Scott 05:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Holy point, enough of the crappy essays. Until(1 == 2) 04:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Holy essay, enough of the crappy point. >Radiant< 12:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  and the point of this is? 

message: I think this page needs a serious definition of the term, as it relates to Wikipedia. -- œ™ 06:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The root of cluocracy, clew, is associated with a ball or sphere, from the German kliuwa, almost as if early English speakers had seen the puzzle ball icon after navigating to Wikipedia's main page.Tamanoeconomico (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the truly clueless 

message: I think that "Wikipedia:CLUE" should redirect to User:ClueBot NG. Kitty 56 (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cluocracy vs. ClueBot

message: in my view this is one of the most important essays in WP.  A little jewel. Jytdog (talk) 09:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  a jewel 

message: "Some Wikipedia processes represent attempts to legislate Clue." - any specific examples? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 09:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is something you see arise sometimes at policy/guidelines discussions when people try to turn them into rulebooks and get hyperdetailed.  The general principles are what matter and there is no end to proposing detailed permutations to try to address people who don't have clue. Jytdog (talk) 19:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So attempts to legislate Clue are misguided? I didn't get that from the essay, could the word "misguided" be added to clarify? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 20:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are.  I have always kind of loved the terseness of this whole thing, including that sentence.   Adding "misguided" is kind of legislating clue :) Jytdog (talk) 21:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I will go away and attempt to grow a clue. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope that was not as upset as it sounds. Jytdog (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not upset at all, that was just my little joke. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: whew.  tone is difficult to convey in written communication. :)  Jytdog (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: Frequently and in dramatic fashion. That this is an ideal should be noted - because incidents where democracy, if not a near proxy to anarchy, rules abound throughout the guide. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  But It Doesn't 

message: The redirect Wikipedia:CLUE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  J947 † edits 11:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikipedia:CLUE]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]