Talk:General Grievous

message: Please sign ALL your comments to this page using --~~~~
 Deskana (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sign

message: "However his existence was a secret, since no Jedi had escaped his presence alive. He first revealed himself to the public when he attacked and dispatched a team of seven Jedi Knights in an aggressive display of lightsaber mastery during the Battle of Hypori. With his mechanical enhancements and attributes combined, he was able to battle five Jedi single-handedly. Only three survived the onslaught."
Five + Three = Eight, not Seven. What's the real number? --Golbez 19:36, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
:"to battle five" not "kill five", the real number is indeed 7 Darth Kevinmhk 03:27, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe i should list out the names: The Battle of Hypori - General Grievous VS Daakman Barrek(death), Ki-Adi-Mundi(survive), Shaak Ti(unconscious), Aayla Secura(unconscious), Sha'a Gi(death), Tarr Seirr(death), K'Kruhk(apparently death, but re-appear in other Expanded Universe materials). --Darth Kevinmhk 03:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Grievous killed Daakman Barrek and Sha'a Gi first, so Grievous could battle the remaining 5 Jedi single-handedly. --Darth Kevinmhk 03:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many Jedi? 

message: Should grievous be added to the category fictional serial killers because he kills,or are soldiers in war not considered serial killers?
:I'd say not. All his killings seem to be in the context of war, not because he is an amoral psychopath who likes killing, which is what one usually thinks of when serial killers come to mind. Should we add Luke Skywalker or Obi-Wan Kenobi? --maru  (talk) Contribs 18:08, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  well now, in the comic book series when the rebels try to attack him on his flagship or wherever he was he seems to kill them without regret. it wasnt really a war. it was a rebelious jedi and a couple friends trying to get back at him for killing their friends.there were battle droids involved but it wasnt an actual battle, i wouldnt say.go ahead on the serial killer category. sounds awesome to me. JonathanLee98 03:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial killer category 

message: How can a villian with the lack of force abilities defeat any jedi/sith in battle? It seems they would just push him away and crush his body in only a few seconds as has been established in previous movies/books etc. I'm confused. Gary Seven 17:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome.-- Malber (talk • contribs) 12:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Force?

message: ... like Obi-wan was acting like a smug, smarmy, condescending, ridiculously-naive piece of human garbage for making a quip about his victory? Grevious, the noble warrior, annihilated, and Obi-wan thinks it best to crack wise? UGH -- Lucas you madman! Theavatar3 19:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.But then again, Lucas was also dumb enough to delete the line "You're lucky you dont taste very good" from the dagobah scene where r2-d2 is launched out of the water. this line seems to imply Luke has tasted r2-d2 before.lol JonathanLee98 03:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  When Grevious gets [[owned]] by Obi-wan, am I the only one who felt... 

message: The Battle of Utapau section seems to be almost completely wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.39.135.153 (talk) 22:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true, Cactus Guru, Obi-Wan does pull the chest plates apart and shoot him (after being pushed near the edge of a platform, dangling in suspense and what-not). Although by now, 2010, I'm not sure if someone's changed it or not. Venku Tur'Mukan (talk) 15:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Utapau section 

message: In Clone Wars, it seems there is evidence that Grievous was directly controlling the strategies of droid troops, at least by the dilaogue before Grievous attacked. --68.41.156.80 03:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details from Hypori Missing 

message: Just noticed that the opening Character paragraph describes Grievous as "an accomplished Jedi hunter in the period before and during the outbreak of the Clone Wars", but in the Clone Wars section, it states he killed his first Jedi during the Battle of Geneosis. Which of these is the correct story? MrJammie 23:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point, MrJammie. It could be that he was a bounty-hunter ("I want them alive!" type stuff), and finally killed a jedi in the Battle of Geonosis. Who knows? Venku Tur'Mukan (talk) 20:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor contradiction 

message: "Only three and barely four survived the onslaught, with one a second later they recovered."
I deleted this sentence because I couldn't figure out what it was trying to say. Someone who can figure it out can add it back in coherently. XAlpha 01:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this even mean? 

message: I took the liberty of correcting his name. The name stated was a creation of that iggnoramus Micky Suttle.71.101.33.174 08:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Exactly in what does Grievous return? And how can Dooku be "alerted to the 'new Grievous' " if he's already dead?
:Section removed; it reeked of bullshit. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Return 

message: One of the articles in this section indicates that grievous blood was that from a transfusion method with blood of a human (Syfo-Dyas). It is nearly impossible for a blood from a human to be compatible with that of an alien, not to mention that it can cause blood cloths and organ failure. --DarthPlagueis 21:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Blood Transfusion of Grievous is From Another Kaleesh 

message: :Image:10577.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:10577.jpg

message: How is it that Grievous' organic parts (eyes, heart, etc.) can survive the rigors of open space when he sucked out of the window of the battleship? - Cybjorg 10:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yah, it's for the same reason that we hear explosions in space. Makes for a better movie. Venku Tur'Mukan (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: It doesn't make sense

message: In the Revenge of the Sith section it tells about all of Grevious' organic parts being destroyed but in "partial rebirth" section it mentions that "a brand new body with his brain left as the only organic part". Is this a mistake in the Star Wars cannon? And could someone site where these contradictions occur?
Movie Canon(with one N) or G-Canon as it's called vs Book Canon, according to books Grievous was pretty much just a brain but in the movie he had all of those parts in that sack thing Obi-wan shot. Pretty much, if you want to go with the books go with the books if you want to go with the movies go with the movies, just don't try to rationalize one thing from one source with another thing from a separate source of canon. All you need to know is the big main facts(Luke blew up the death star, Anakin kills a village of Sand people, Grievous is a Cyborg) is in both. However how it came to be, might be different in both in fact in "the Clone Wars" series the writer has gone on record saying he has actually formed things how things happen in books comics and how they are in the movies but left it up to the audience to believe what they want-76.21.106.232 (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: It doesn't make sense, part II

message: What is the source for the end of the partial rebirth section? it seems like fanon..(and not the NK part, the part where it is possible Palpatine rezes him) 71.122.158.91 18:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's from the MMO Star Wars Galaxies.172.188.238.81 (talk) 17:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: If I may ask..

message: I'm being nitpicky, but can we get a pic of grievous in his normal pose. [IE standing up in human like pose, only him in the pic?] thans (Treedemfoir (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grievous image 

message: The amount of information about ILM and their work on the Transformers movie seems completely unecessary to me, I have no problem with it being mentioned but I don't think there needs to be a description and explination.172.188.238.81 (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I cut it. It seems like it's enough just to state that he was one of their most complicated models "at the time" as opposed to including a lengthy aside about Transformers that doesn't even make a direct comparison between the two films. 209.40.212.28 (talk) 03:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformers? 

message: How he become a Cyborg? This page said nothing about he becoming a cyborg wearing a lightsaber carrying cape.(209.129.62.2 (talk) 03:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyborg 

message: With the Television series of the Clone Wars, Grievous plays an important role.  Should we put that up there? Queenqpawn (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV 

message: Hi all. I noticed that in the "Novels" section, there are no references other than the books themselves. Is that suitable?
Also, while I'm here, I might as well suggest this--should there be more talk about GG's religion in his background? That's the very reason he would have rather died than be sustained by technological means. His planet was very natural and his religion had everything to do with nature and maintaining a natural life. He absolutely hates droids (very clear in the new animated series, where he knocks droids' heads off without thinking of the cost from factories). Thus, he may be mocking the monotony of the battle droids by saying, "Roger, roger, roger, roger," in Battlefront II (video games section).
Maybe this whole talk section is pointless, as the books themselves are references, and I don't remember where I read the information on GG's background (but I know it's there somewhere in LucasArts' archives). Feedback please. Venku Tur'Mukan (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: His arms could split into two, making four arms. Agent 14LC (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: In Episode III, I think he had 4 arms. But the picture here shows only 2 arms.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francispotter (talk • contribs) 15:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: His arms could split into two, making four arms. Agent 14LC (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many arms? 

message: Ought "Grievous murdered numerous Jedi" be softened to "Grievous killed numerous Jedi" in the lede? "Star Wars" characters claiming that the killings in question constitute murders is neither here nor there, surely. And determining whether the authors mean for them to be perceived, and/or whether the audience does perceive them as such, runs afoul of OR policy, absent an appropriate attribution.
- 2A02:560:4201:7A00:C189:8ECC:3818:9BD5 (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2021 

message: Neo spamton gets no rizz 2603:8080:A301:E7C5:B993:D5AB:176F:D8BC (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo spamton