lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Allison T56

message: Pretty small article for the engine behind the C-130, one of the most successful planes of all times, plus P3 and E-2. Should be up there with the J79 as greatest engines of all time. 15.219.153.78 (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty short 

message: The variants section of this article has become very large, out of proportion with the other sections. I propose to split it as was done recently with Rolls-Royce Olympus and Rolls-Royce Olympus variants unless there are any objections. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large variants section
Talk:Armstrong Siddeley Viper

message: hi guys, it seems that one prototpye of the L-29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_L-29_Delfin was also powered by that engine. Maybe it is worth mentioning? Cheers 91.44.216.209 (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the L-29 as the fact is cited at that article and is supported by the Flight International source. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prototype L-29 (XL29)
Talk:Sparrow Records

message: I'm removing the {list-cleanup} tag from Jan 2008 on the Artists section, and have trimmed this section down to the current artists listed on the Sparrow Records website as of July 2009.  Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 22:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist list 

message: The label is owned by EMI.  EMI Christian Music Group is mere an umbrella that it operates under and is distributed through; it is not the 'parent company.'  The info box is not completely accurate. –The Real One Returns (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The immediate owners are EMI CMG which is a sub-label of EMI. The infobox is completely accurate. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  The way you changed it, that EMI CMG was simply a distribution group is no more accurate as they have several distribution channels. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership and Distribution 

message: http://www.sparrowrecords.com/ lists the current roster. Should we update based on that? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current roster of artists
Talk:Soucouyant

message: I can't see a single reason these two shouldn't be merged into one; I don't consider myself versed enough in the lingua to say which one should be dominant, but the two articles are clearly on the same subject.  In the process of the merge, hopefully a lot of the fat will be trimmed off.  --mordicai. 20:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Soucriant]]?

message: In the article, this sentence is in the Origin Section: "...mistakenly confused the Loogahoo with Loup-garou, also known as canus lupis". Does anyone know if this is meant to refer to canIs lupis, or the common wolf? Crashdown13 (talk) 07:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canus Lupis: Possible Spelling Mistake? 

message: Removed Saint Lucia from the conversation until credible sources for its inclusion can be met. I have found zero credible sources, just articles that have piggybacked this article. Savvyjack23 (talk) 19:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint Lucia
Talk:Peter Nilson

message: Peter Nilsson is an extremely common name in Sweden, while Peter Nilson actually is somewhat rare, since there is no name "Nil" in Swedish. "Nilsson" can be considered a short version of "Nils+s+son", the first "Nils" is a name (short for Nicolaus), the second "s" is (of course) a genitive marker like in English, and "son" is Swedish for "son" (voilá!). By Swedish spelling rules, three consonants or more are always contracted to two, so "Nilsson" is the correct contraction of "Nils'es son". Nilson is however some demonstration of "uniqueness", by Swedish culture. But if there are other Peter Nilsons (a not too unlikely guess, since f.ex. Americans and others adher to their own spelling rules), we should consider moving this page to Peter Nilson (astronomer). Said: Rursus ☻ 12:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name - considering addition: (astronomer)
Talk:International Aero Engines

message: Rolls-Royce have sold their share of the company to Pratt & Whitney.
See, for example:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-13/rolls-exits-engine-venture-to-prepare-for-next-generation-jets.html
and
http://www.pw.utc.com/media_center/press_releases/2011/10_oct/10-12-2011_00001.asp
86.176.165.110 (talk) 01:45, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolls-Royce departure 
Talk:Charter Oak State College

message: The Role and Scope section is taken almost word-for-word from the "Mission Statement" published by U.S. News and World Report, at this URL: .  It's unclear whether U.S. News got this from somewhere else that grants permission for its use. Energy Dome (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the reference.  U.S. News used the info from Charter Oak's website.  Charter Oak is a public college, and all info pertaining to it and published by it is also public. Danielsan1701 (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Great!  Thanks for tracking that down.  Energy Dome (talk) 21:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role and Scope section--possible copyright violation
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Dereks1x

message: For the record I'll explain why the WP:COI assertion is groundless.  WP:RFA#Akhilleus has received unanimous support.  Jersyko's opinion one way or the other makes no difference to the outcome.  I wasn't the only editor to view the question as disruptive and inappropriate. DurovaCharge! 02:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, I evaluated Akhilleus on the merits and I participate in Rfa somewhat regularly. · j e r s y k o talk · 02:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No conflict of interest
Talk:Oracle Fusion Middleware

message: Does Wikipedia allow this? This is a company advertising product.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Metroking (talk • contribs) 1 April 2007
Why would Wikipedia not allow it?   How is this any different to Red Hat Enterprise Linux?   Oracle Fusion is the successor of Oracle Forms; this is a very significant product in the enterprise software world, and does warrant an article.  Trust me, Oracle doesnt need a Wikipedia article to do its PR; if Oracle cared, they could do a much better job than the few contributors who have put together this article. John Vandenberg 03:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Edited this awhile back and saw that User:Prhartcom apparently wants more copy-edits, but didn't say what. If instead, the desire is to address WP:OR, WP:NPOV, etc., claims, copy-edit is the wrong tag. I made a few additional tweaks, and pulled the tag again. Please don't re-add it without being more specific about needed changes. All feedback appreciated. Lfstevens (talk) 04:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edits 

message: The Oracle Universal Content Management hyperlink (bullet 7.7 within this section, just before 'identity management') goes to a page which redirects back to itself.  Should the entire line and bullet be removed, or just remove the hyperlink? 86.138.46.254 (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oracle Fusion Middleware components section
Talk:Dunbar Armored robbery

message: I've been searching http://www.crimelibrary.com/ for a few hours now, and I can't find a thing about any Dunbar Armored Robbery. Anywhere. I've just searched "Dunbar Armored Robbery" in google (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Dunbar+Armored+Robbery), and while I've found several links about attacks on Dunbar Armored Cars, I haven't found anything about a robbery like the one this article describes. Save of course the top link that goes to this article.
So... no information from any credible sources about this robbery. Wikipedia requires sources for its content. I'm going to search my ass off for sources, I hope someone else does to. I'm marking the page as uncited. Paladin Hammer (talk) 03:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found these: http://www.calbar.ca.gov/calbar/2cbj/01dec/page25-1.htm , http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7154191.stm , http://www.jackboulware.com/writing/historys-unsolved-heists . Anyone out there think one will work? I've found more, but they are all worded (as if they were copied and pasted) exactly like wikipedia. Can I get an opinion? Paladin Hammer (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources? At all? 

message: I can't find any primary source docs with the lead referenced in the story about Eugene Hill passing still-wrapped bills.  All primary sources mention the broken piece of taillight (mentioned in reference) as the main lead (which didn't help much until an informant talked).  Any comments?
Scottedwards2000 (talk) 16:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't see anything in reference or search about Eugene Hill passing still-wrapped bills - only taillight lead
Talk:October 1997 Loomis Fargo robbery

message: The opening paragraph says that approximately 95% of the cash was recovered, but 'Arrests, trials, and convictions' section says that "more than 88%" of the money was recovered.  Which is the correct figure?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimBurd (talk • contribs) 22:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Recovered Cash?

message: Is the (1997) really necessary? There doesn't seem to be another one with a similar name that needs disambiguating... 68.39.174.238 03:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Point well taken; I had thought that the year of the crime was necessary or useful in the title.  Thanks for doing the move.  ProfessorPaul 02:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nothing in the "Planning" section, or "Heist," or subsection "Ghantt as Prime Suspect" is cited, and much of this material may be controversial.  What are the sources--newspapers?  Prosecution accounts?  Confessions?
I'll hold off on anything drastic--I'm new here.  But the libel concern appears serious to me.Ongoing Discussion (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  These are living people....where are the citations? 

message: The Mastermind episode that is mentioned is about a completely different heist. 
Unless there is a Mastermind episode about Loomis that I haven't found.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.109.74 (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Media Portrayals is wrong 

message: The new CNBC Program "Super Heists" did a program on this featuring interviews with the participants.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.154.144 (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Portrayal
Talk:Ewald von Kleist-Schmenzin

message: Repeat removal
Removal of take-over and murder of mother in June 1945 at the family estate 
Removal again: In June 1945 with the conquest, take-over of Pomerania and subsequent expulsions by Communists, Ewald's mother, Gräfin von Kleist tried to remain at the family estate at Dubberow, where she was murdered by Poles. 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.136.248.207 (talk) 21:48, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Long-range identification and tracking (ships)

message: This pages seemed to have been hijacked by Absolute communications who sell software to Panama. I have restored a neutral view.
(
This article is clearly written without neutral point of view.  The stuff about "LRIT in its current form does more harm than good by making it easier for terrorist..." needs to be rephrased and moved into a "Criticism" section. N432SEAN 02:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged the LRIT article into this article. Please review. Thanks. // Mark Renier (talk) 09:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

message: I've identified a couple of edits introducing potential commercial spam:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=327294459&oldid=323875923
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=346085820&oldid=328284752
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=346086089&oldid=346085820
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=522819073&oldid=483015764
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=522819155&oldid=522819073
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=522819364&oldid=522819155
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=523342156&oldid=522819364
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=523342360&oldid=523342156
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=523344867&oldid=523342360
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Long-range_identification_and_tracking_(ships)&diff=523345025&oldid=523344867
I've reverted the edits or made them a little more neutral, additional help is welcome.
2.235.213.226 (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial spam
Talk:Albertus Magnus College

message: I searched on the net for information about the DUI, and was unable to find a reliable source.  I think one or two other people should try their own search and then delete it if we cannot find a source.  If you know the source (assuming it's not bogus), feel free to add it back.  Cazort (talk) 02:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frederick I of Württemberg

message: The ordinal should be included - he himself used it when he declared himself king, to indicate a break from his previous status as duke Frederick III. Note Juan Carlos I of Spain. john k (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Johnstown, New York

message: Nice job so far on this article, but some of the biographic details probably need to by placed in the articles about the people.  I removed a false link and did a little reorganizing with some new headers, removing some repeated items, and added a little more. Stepp-Wulf 02:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Within the current article it describes the location of Johnstown, NY as 45 miles west of Albany, NY, and that is all the context that is given.  I would like to change it to say 45 miles northwest of Albany, NY, within the foothills of the Adirondack Mountains.  I would like to make this change because, the current description gives the reader no real concept of where Johnstown, NY is located.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbreed12 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Relevant Geographical Information
Talk:Connecticut State Community College Norwalk

message: I've created a stub article, Connecticut State Community College, which simply mentions the merger and lists the campuses, but I would really like some feedback on how the names of the individual colleges should now be 'styled'. See Talk:Connecticut State Community College. If I don't get any feedback I'll just follow the lead of this article, and start moving existing articles in a few days. Dpbsmith (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization into Connecticut State Community College in general
Talk:2/10th Armoured Regiment (Australia)

message: Hello to the editors of 2/10th Armoured Regiment, As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed an rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation:Photograph and material bring it to the base of a start classification,  Article would be improved by inline references and more material.  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 02:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed
Talk:M*A*S*H season 6

message: In the episode of "In Love and War" (season 6), Hawkeye falls for a Korean aristocrat who is taking care of her ailing mother and several orphans.  They listen to Beethoven on an old phonograph while eating kimshi and fish.  Does anyone know which Beethoven piece this is?
Thank you.  Julie68.43.201.57 03:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Love and War

message: Who is adding month and year to some of the episode descriptions?  Very very few MASH episodes cite a date, and a larger subset (but still a minority) are identifiable with an approximate date.  We all know that there are too many inconsistencies and continuity errors in the series to allow any kind of timeline to be drawn ... so why tag any episodes with dates? - only one story in the whole series really hinges on a real historical event, and that is the final episode. Darcyj 08:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually that's not quite true. The 1952 Olympics episode is another example. There are quite a few that refer to actual events, making it possible to pinpoint them. Harry was a white dog with black spots 18:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Datelines 

message: All the individual episode pages for Season 6 fail notability guidelines, inluding the notability guidelines for television episodes, and have been tagged accordingly.  Might I suggest these articles are improved with real-world information (ie. referencing with reliable sources) to assert notability, removing trivia (seeWP:TRIVIA) quotes, overly long plot summaries (a breach of copyright) or consider merging the information onto this season page.  Otherwise, when these pages come up for review in fourteen days, they may be redirected, merged or deleted. If you want any help or info, then come to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Episode coverage. Thanks. Gwinva 19:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode notability
Talk:April 2007 in sports

message: Is it now appropriate if we start adding results for football/soccer leagues in Europe? Since they're nearing the homestretch, the following types of teams may be added:
*Teams competing for the championship (ManUtd and Chelsea)
*Teams competing for the last European berth (Real Madrid and Real Zaragoza for the last UCL berth)
*Teams competing against relegation (Wigan, Sheffield, Charlton, WHU and Watford)
While limiting the leagues with the best UEFA coefficients (like the top 5) plus the SPL. --Howard the Duck 05:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club football 
Talk:Ghouls in gaming

message: Suggestion: Let's take the other games section and break it up by type. That way all the tabletop, Computer RPG, tabletop RPG, real-time strategy games, etcetera don't require a pointless link in each entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.33.184 (talk • contribs) 
Also, weren't some ghouls in HoMM? -- Jokes Free4Me 23:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kenneth McDuff

message: Would Kenneth McDuff classify as a serial killer? There's definitely a difference between a simple murderer and a bonafide serial killer. He seemed to have patterns of murder and was a sexual sadist. I think his general outlaw lifestyle was merely in conjunction with his status as a serial killer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.39.139 (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Serial Killer?

message: This article needs citations throughout.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ongaku72 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: The ages of the victims seem to contradict
WhisperToMe (talk) 23:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ages
Talk:Woolverstone Hall

message: NOTE: I have reduced names of cited persons to initials and will maintain this practice in future. Aeronian 06:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have correspondence from two OBs, DH and BB which correctly establish that the term 'Woolverstone Hall Grammar Boarding School for Boys' was applied to the former LNS in 1950. Another old friend, RG, was part of the same intake. However, the title 'Woolverstone Hall School' was used in 1951 when that intake became the second form. The link with LNS (and training for the Artificers' Apprentices or "Tiffy" exams) was terminated except for some of a score or more students who became the third and fourth forms of the new school.--Aeronian 06:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: DH has now found documentary proof (viz, his December 1950 school report) that the name Woolverstone Hall School had been adopted in late 1950. Both he and BB maintain that the 'Grammar' version was definitely in use earlier, both in paperwork presented to their parents and in a nameplate on the school gate. (In the UK, the school year began in mid-September and it was then, on arrival in the bus, that they would have noticed the gate sign.)--Aeronian 14:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Boys' school]

message: Since there is a separate article on Woolverstone Hall School, I have removed what I see as inappropriate and irrelevant details from this article, including citations from the book My Life with George: What I Learned about Joy from One Neurotic (and Very Expensive) Dog. Use had been made of purported citations from this book to move the establishment of the boys' school from the 1950s to the 1960s—a misleading abuse. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate detail
Talk:Cosimo Cavallaro

message: Hmmm notice the exhibition of Chocolate Jesus was going to open on the 1st April, Poisson d'Avril ! Zuytdorp Survivor 03:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The Canberra Times of 7 April 2007 reports that a full-size chocolate Jesus on a pine cross was exhibited in the shop-window gallery, Artstop, in Canberra over Easter in 1994. It was entitled Transubstantiation 2 and was created by Richard Manderson.
Its stated purpose was to prompt reflection on the way that Easter, itself having taken over pre-Christian celebrations of spring and fecundity, has now been largely commercialised into a festival of chocolate consumption, quite at odds with the events of Jesus' crucifixion.
After Easter, the sculpture was taken down and shared among a crowd of Canberrans.
There is a picture at 
RicoPalatino 04:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chocolate Jesus sculpted in Australia 13 years ago 

message: The Bill Donahue mentions he is accused of being irreligious, or at least not Christian. Are there any sources where he mentions his religion? 92.0.150.111 (talk) 09:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion?
Talk:Junge Wilde

message: This seems to be a mess at present:
* Combination of transavantgarde art with German CDU politicians;
* Inter-wiki links to the German article which brings in yet more wide usages of the term - from quantum mechanics to football;
* Acknowledging (as does the German article) that Neue Wilde is the more common term for the artists.
So what to do with it? My suggestion is that Neue Wilde would be the correct placement for the article on the artists, leaving Junge Wilde for the politicians. But it isn't clear how to get from here to there while preserving their respective edit histories? AllyD (talk) 21:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: * Further note: Neue Wilde is currently a redirect to this page whereas the plural Neue Wilden is a redirect to Neo-expressionism. AllyD (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tangle of misnamed duplicates