Talk:Martha Gellhorn

message: I understand that this article has had its issues, but why is it blacklisted? Pookiyama (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted 

message: As far as I know there are no wikirules against stating cause or manner of death. I have reverted to earlier copy: "At the age of 89, ill and nearly completely blind, she ended her life by taking a poison pill." Bardwell 16:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death 

message: Gellhorn herself asserted that Hemingway slept with only five women in his entire life, counting his four marriages. These remarks can be found in the book on Hemingway and Gellhorn's trip to China in 1940, "Hemingway on the China Front."
Also, "poison pill" is misleading. Supposedly she took an overdose of sleeping pills.
HolySh!tIAmOnFire (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death and marital indiscretions 

message: I lodged a mild protest today about what I consider less than useful edits on Utan Vax's discussion page, particularly his/her call for a citation in immediate juxtaposition with a properly sourced quotation. He/she is not willing to budge, and I don't go in for edit wars. Any other watchers of this page intereste--El Ingles (talk) 19:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, if you are referring to this edit , Utan made a good call there.  Removing a deleted image and removing idle speculation as to someone's love life is a good thing.  A random authoring saying "he could've slept with her" is not a well sourced or encyclopedic fact. MBisanz talk 22:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I am referring to that edit. The facts of Gellhorn's sex life are far from idle, and are an important part of her personality, as Moorehead correctly realised. The fact that she remained friendly with de Jouvenal is also of legitimate interest to the reader of an encyclopedia. "Sexual desires" is not an improvement on "sexual conquests" in the context. Actually it's a bit weasely. But my main complaint is that Utan Vax calls for a citation when one is given in immediate juxtaposition with his fact tag. Cheers. --El Ingles (talk) 14:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless, it's better than it was. "Her spectacular sexual conquests" pales in comparison to my version. Of course, there's always a "better" alternative, but, anyway, please read WP:NPOV. We can't write WP:OR or WP:SPECULATION. Utan Vax (talk) 15:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Okay, to reflect the main problem with the sentence (that, for some reason, you reinserted here amongst other things despite its many faults), I have changed it to an  tag. Utan Vax (talk) 15:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utan Vax's "clean-up" 

message: The respectful and consistent heading regarding someone's intimate relationships based on wikipedia style standards is "Personal Life."  Looking at other wikipedia pages of the most notable men for infidelity and sexual liaisons (such as John Kennedy, Pablo Picasso, Wilt Chamberlain, Warren Beatty, etc. etc.) not one of them has a section singled out for "love affairs."  I think the heading of "love affairs" betrays a bit of a sexist style bias in how we frame the sexually free women of history vs. the sexually free men of history.  Also, I've removed the phrase "countless lovers" which is unverifiable hyperbole and also that her lovers "tended to be married men."  Even though that may be true, again it is an inconsistent bias as the great male "Lotharios" of history undoubtedly bedded many married women, yet that edit is not seen fit to be included in their pages.  I have also removed the phrases "briefly devoted mother" and "not maternal" for two reasons.  First, there is no citation to support this.  Second, again, although many men of history left their children in the care of others while pursuing their careers, wikipedia does not describe any of them as "not paternal."  This is a double standard with respect to how we judge men's vs. women's parenting.  Even Frank Lloyd Wright, who notoriously abandoned his wife and six children to live in scandal with his mistress is not described in his article as "not paternal," for example.  It is a sexist, biased observation to say that Gellhorn was not devoted or not maternal because others cared for her child while she pursued her career.  Amyluna13 (talk) 07:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing "Marriages and Love Affairs" heading to "Personal Life" and removing Hyperbole, etc 

message: StuHarris characterized my revisions based on this article's inconsistent style regarding women's vs. men's sex and parenting lives as bowdlerisations.  My understanding of the term is that to bowdlerize means to remove something because it offends personal taste.  I removed the passages not because they offended my subjective personal taste (which they did) but because they represented an objective bias with respect to the gender of article's subject, which compromises the standards of wikipedia.  Just because something is subjectively distasteful does not mean that it is mutually exclusive from being objectively inappropriate, as this material was.  In fact, to attack the motives of the person making an argument, instead of evaluating the merits of the argument is the "ad hominem" fallacy of argumentation.  The characterization in this case resembles the common tactic of characterizing a logical argument as being "emotionally" or "personally" driven because it came from a woman. :) Amyluna13 (talk) 00:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  characterizing the removal of sex bias from an article as "bowdlerisations" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Martha Gellhorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141208152724/http://www.worldmediarights.com/index.php?hidAction=episode&eid=2552&name=Martha_Gellhorn to http://www.worldmediarights.com/index.php?hidAction=episode&eid=2552&name=Martha_Gellhorn
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015135916/http://www.electricsky.com/catalogue_detail.aspx?program=213 to http://www.electricsky.com/catalogue_detail.aspx?program=213
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The file  on Wikimedia Commons has been nominated for deletion. View and participate in the deletion discussion at the . Community Tech bot (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: It is a fact that Gellhorn ran over and killed a small boy in Mombasa, when he ran in front of her car.During her marriage to Hemingway, she aborted a pregnancy which she never told him about.  It is also true that she was raped, in Kenya, at the age of 79, and never physically recovered. These were essential realities of her life. She herself wrote and talked about them. They were important to her. They should appear in the article, and it's peculiar that they didn't.
Younggoldchip (talk) 19:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Record