lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The House That Shadows Built

message: In regards who played "Mr. Lee" in the Marx Brothers segment of this film, there seems to be some confusion. Ben Taggart, who is usually credited with this role, did NOT play "Mr. Lee" . Taggart did play the ship's captain in "Monkey Business." The role of "Mr. Lee" was played by actor Davison Clark. Clark later played the role of the frustrated passport officer in "Monkey Business." A simple viewing of both films (or their relative sections) will make this clear. Dobizzo (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Taggart and Davison Clark
Talk:Bud

message: The second picture, the one with the cone-shaped bud, needs a caption.
:Indeed.  Four years and STILL nobody knows what it is!  <FONT COLOR="#800000"><B>Soap</B></FONT> Talk/Contributions 22:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Tell me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.104.141.170 (talk) 01:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are buds protected by? 

message: This section has to be rewrited and the illustration removed.
Introduction is botanically perfect  but not this section which contains many mistakes.
===1. Bud scars===
Buds themselves usually don't make any scars because they don't fall but transform themselves into stems or wait a more or less long time as dormant buds. Only when accidentally removed do they leave a traumatic scar.
Usual morphological scars are either leaf scars (as on the illustration) and they may sometimes be used for species identification or 'bud scale' scars (note: only scars made by the fallen scales) and as making a ring around the stem, they may be used for growth counting (very difficult to use them for identification).
--Channer (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of buds 

message: Buds themselves usually don't make any scars because they don't fall but transform themselves into stems or wait a more or less long time as dormant buds. Only when accidentally removed do they leave a traumatic scar.
Usual morphological scars are either leaf scars (as on the illustration) and they may sometimes be used for species identification or 'bud scale' scars (note: only scars made by the fallen scales) and as making a ring around the stem, they may be used for growth counting (very difficult to use them for identification).
--Channer (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1. Bud scars

message: There should be a caption for the second image, the large cone-like thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spiekier (talk • contribs) 02:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption 

message: I removed the comment "Common termanology (sic) for the smokable part of the cannabis sativa plant marijuana."  That use of the word "bud" is accounted for on the disambiguation page.  It doesn't belong here any more than does Larry "Bud" Melman--also on the disambiguation page.  140.147.236.194 (talk) 21:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraneous comment about marijuana
Talk:Room Service (1938 film)

message: Gummo Marx, of course, was the fifth Marx brother who started out with them in vaudeville, but had left the act by the time they got into the movies (he was older than Zeppo but younger than Groucho).  I watched "Room Service" on AMC years ago, and I seem to remember the person introducing it saying that Gummo had a small role in this film, and that it was the only Marx Brothers film in which he appeared.  Is that true or is my memory off?97.73.64.160 (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Gummo in his film?
Talk:Hurricane Betsy (1956)

message: More impact, better intro, better storm history...this is just slightly more than a stub. Jdorje 21:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Im having trouble trying to upload Betsy 1956 storm track Storm05 14:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you link me to it? -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 02:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Storm Track

message: Sorry, but this one doesn't have much meaningful content. All this info is pretty much already described on the 1956 page. Support. -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 02:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The content's better than most of the ones we've merged; with some work it could be passable.  I dunno. Jdorje 03:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus, the storm is at least notable. Every other article that's been merged in the last two weeks has been short about a weak or fish storm. I say hold of on merge. Hurricanehink 12:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added more informationStorm05 15:46, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Go West (1940 film)

message: Ugh, this page looks awful... "one of them goes to fill a bucket..." How awful!
If no-one has any objections, I'd like to rewrite the whole description and add what I can. The Lilac Pilgrim 19:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hereby give permission for you to start. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 22:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total re-work
Talk:A Night in Casablanca

message: The famous line "Play it again, Sam", often attributed to the character of Rick in Casablanca, was originally said in this film.
This is not true, and impossible, because Casablanca was released in 1942 and this film was released in 1946. I have removed this from the trivia section.
--Dawgs0392 01:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that it theoretically would be possible according to the information given above, but I just saw the film, and it does not contain the line (unless some extra whispers it in the background in a particularly noisy part of the film). Mlewan 12:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  famous line 

message: Dan Seymour appeared in both Casablanca and A Night in Casablanca 117.102.154.20 (talk) 12:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dan Seymour

message: The Three Stooges were not in the film. 2603:8001:2603:CDCC:B1E5:201E:FC42:4267 (talk) 01:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: They were not in a lot of films. Aredbeardeddwarf (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Several months ago the description for this film credited them with being in it. I’m glad to see that’s been changed. 2603:8001:2603:CDCC:C15D:4C70:5DF4:8709 (talk) 20:19, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Night In Casablanca
Talk:Love Happy

message: Something needs to be inserted in the article about this being, in most fans' opinions, the weakest of the Marx Brothers's films, even more despised than The Big Store. --- JS,156.110.47.73 14:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: it sure was an awful filmCramyourspam (talk) 17:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Their Worst Film?

message: So if Groucho's appearance in the film was really not "an afterthought", why IS his appearance in the film "encapsulated" and so very limited? Why do the three brothers never appear together? Something should be found to explain this in the article. 108.1.68.189 (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion: Groucho's limited appearance 
Talk:Rigpa

message: From the article: Rigpa in the Tibetan language means the gap between thoughts. Tibetan Buddhist monks try to focus on that particular moment in order to achieve a clear and still state of mind during meditation.
It seems to me that this does not correspond to what the dictionaries say. I also do not remember such term usage from any of the relevant books on Dzogchen. Is it a Sutra interpretation? --Klimov 21:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gap between thoughts?

message: *
#for rig
#for pa
#for ye shes
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.72.39 (talk) 20:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Look here

message: I really like Sogyal and I respect him, and admittedly I need to study his work and practical recommendations in greater depth. However, as I have, at other pages, I really have to recommend that ancient venerable texts, and words, with ancient lineage, need to be discussed, in their opening paragraphs, in an objective manner which does not in any manner highlight any one particular school of thought or, especially, any one particular contemporary writer.
Obviously, it is irrelevant that you may insist that any such writer is the nţħ incarnation of some highly regarded source. This is, after all, wikipedia, and, even if there is good cause to believe that a particular contemporary may in fact be a tulka or even an embodicment of Avalokiteshvara, that contention is, per se, POV. 
In all seriousness, the reference to Sogyal Rinpoche needs to be either (a) in footnote, or (b) in a later paragraph. If we permit the definition of an ancient word to even appear to be in any manner promotional of a particular author or movement which is active in today's world, the situation will deteriorate to a battle between different denominations, factions, sects, organizations and there will be unfair unintended consequences impacting not just those most interested in the topic but also the general users of WMF...|  GeofferyBard(talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede (lead section) needs tweaking 

message: I've merged Kadag Trekchö and Lhündrub Tögal into Rigpa; after cleaning-up and removing all the unreadable stuff, very little remained, with substantial doublures. Placed together it makes a better article. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging-in Kadag Trekchö and Lhündrub Tögal
Talk:A. W. Andrews

message: I suspect A W Andrews was Arthur Westlake Andrews, that he did a first ascent (Andrews renne on Storen) in Norway in 1899, and produced a book or two of poems about West Penwith (Cornwall) in 1957.
(He is also possibly the author of a c1916 'A  text book of Geography')
Please confirm before including :-)
Linuxlad 21:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tentative info

message: I now have a reference for Andrews' inention to traverse all of GB between high and low water, using a rope, but not swimming. 
O'Sullivan, Pete (1984) West Penwith (2nd edition), Climbers Club, 
Apparently he used the convention that you weren't swimming if your nose is out of the water! He started at Bosigran in about 1922, working West along Penwith. He met the challenge of the Great Zawn by lassoing a rock and lowering himself down - but found it very difficult to escape up the slippery rock (later climbed at HVS). He appears to have found enough difficulties in Cornwall to leave the original project largely unfulfilled. Linuxlad 17:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Traverse of Coast of Britain
Talk:Rich Kotite

message: Absolutely terrible, biased article.  Needs cleanup. 129.98.212.61 21:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There should be some mention of his ability relative to other coaches. Many believe he was the worst Jet coach ever. Many believe he was the worst coach of that decade, or even worse than that. Not a good coach.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.50.187 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a cite of the New York Post hed the day he was hired: "DUMB AND DUMBER", over pictures of him and his predecessor? Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  relative ability 
Talk:Laffy Taffy (song)

message: i think the song is stupid  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.191.216.69 (talk) 18:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  stupid song 
Category talk:Rivers of Brazil

message: I think we have to be consistent with the names of rivers.  Following all other encyclopedias foreign rivers are called (.....) River and not Rio Madalena or Rio Grande etc.  We have quite a mixture of names on this page and I myself am responsible for some of the confusion since I wrote the articles without knowing the correct forms.  Could someone please make these river names consistent?  By the way, the Paraibuna is considered a Minas Gerais river and not a Rio de Janeiro river and I made the correction.  Vogensen 21:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Frot

message: I reverted Master Deusoma on changing the "frot" to "frottage" throughout the article. This article is called "frot" for a reason; this is because "frot" specifically refers to male-male frottage, while frottage in general can refer to any type of couple engaging in genital-genital rubbing. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:55, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And I didn't state that frottage is always genital-to-genital rubbing. This section of the Non-penetrative sex article is clear that it isn't only about that. Tribadism is frottage, but it is not only genital-genital rubbing. Frot, however? Yes, it's specifically penis-on-penis sexual activity. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Also, at the Non-penetrative sex article, it's stated that the Princeton rub, Ivy League rub, and so on are slang terms referring to male-male frot or intercrural sex, or both. Clearly, we have an Intercrural sex article. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted mass change of "frot" to "frottage"   
Talk:Diverticulosis

message: I believe the first use of an acronym in an article should define what it means.  NIDDK isn't defined, only referenced in the references section.  This leaves the reader with no idea what is being talked about.  
Shawnkielty 01:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym use.   

message: Recent review in Am J Gastroenterol:  JFW | T@lk 10:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Near the end of the article, it refers to surgery for Diverticulitis. 'Days lost from work' would be subjective, and would not necessarily apply to every patient. --71.111.23.79 (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Days Lost From Work' 

message: The lede had a sentence "This is uncommon before the age of 40 for some unknown reason Diverticulosis is being treated in patients as young as 35 years old, and increases in incidence after that age." - I have reverted the last edit (30 August 2009) as unsourced: the sentence now reads "This is uncommon before the age of 40, and increases in incidence after that age." which is (i) better English; (ii) less confusing; and (iii) agrees with the cited ref. If the phrase that I reverted is actually true, then perhaps somebody could find a suitable source, and also word it to read as good English. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrase removed from lede 

message: I am 100% sure the guy who first wrote this article (or at least changed it to the most recent state, of course, before I edited it) didn't learn how to write a proper wiki article. This article lacks links to the other article, and definitely needs some cleanup. I added categories and seperated it into chapters, but someone will have to do the rest.--125.131.129.132 (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'un-wiki-fied' 

message: Both refer to the same JAMA article. The Newswise article (13) simply refers to the JAMA article (12).
The veracity of the JAMA article has questionable as the conclusion reads:
:In this large, prospective study of men without known diverticular disease, nut, corn, and popcorn consumption did not increase the risk of diverticulosis or diverticular complications. The recommendation to avoid these foods to prevent diverticular complications should be reconsidered.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.191.172.156 (talk) 04:13, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 12 and 13 

message: - perforated diverticular disease more common in those on glucocorticoids and those on opioids. You can guess why. JFW | T@lk 12:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drugs that cause gut rot 

message: Inclusion of a diagram of the colon, labeling e.g. 'sigmoid colon', 'ascending colon', 'descending colon','transverse colon' etc would be helpful. 
As would additional epidemiology, eg incidence, prevalence, mortality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.216.73.166 (talk) 00:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram of colon
Talk:Nilsson

message: There seems to be some discussion about Birgit Nilsson's date of death (end of 2005 or beginning of 2006) . Please update if necessary. <KF> 22:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since yesterday, several sources have confirmed Christmas Day, 2005. See also http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/article337978.ece. <KF> 09:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kutia

message: This should be moved to Wikipedia:Cookbook. `'mikka 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General recipe 

message: According to the Ukrianian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, kolyvo is "a dish of wheat cooked with honey" eaten at furnerals.  Sounds exactly like kutia and koliva.  Is there really any difference? --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to kolyvo 

message: It is worth mentioning that in Lithuania, a traditional dish kūčia is being served at the dinner table on Christmas Eve. https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C5%AB%C4%8Dia 79.132.162.163 (talk) 10:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithuanian equivalent
Talk:Rolleiflex

message: Rolleiflex is a product line from Rollei, so it deserves its own page, not a redirect. Bendybendy 22:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The characteristics, history, and development of the Rolleiflex TLR and SLR lines are wholly different, so I propose to split the article into TLR and SLR articles.
Oboeaaron 13:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article into TLR and SLR articles 
Talk:Ust-Orda Buryat Okrug

message: Ust-Orda Buryatia (Russian: Усть-Орды́нский Буря́тский автоно́мный о́круг) is a federal subject of Russia (an autonomous okrug of Irkutsk Oblast). 
one federal subject is part of another? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 22:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With the exception of Chukotka, all autonomous okrugs are nested.  They are, however, also considered independent federal subjects.  Welcome to Russia, a land of unexplainable logic :)—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 04:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page links to :Image:Flag_of_Ust-Ord_Buriatia_%28Ust-Ord_Buryatia%29.png with blue background, while Flags of Federal subjects of Russia links to :Image:Ust-Orda Buryatia Flag.gif with green background.  Anyone know which is correct? AnonMoos 03:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the official website, blue background is correct.  The green version seems to be taken from this website, which also contains the "newer" blue version.  Looks like the uploader simply grabbed the incorrect version of the flag.  Flagspot also refers to different legislative documents; I can look into the originals if you are interested (and if I can find them).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the above seems to have settled the question, thanks... AnonMoos 16:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Though I do wonder whether the color of the disk should really be bright yellow -- the white triskelion shows up much better against a gold disk (as in the GIF) than against a bright yellow disk (as in the PNG). AnonMoos 16:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The official website calls that color "golden".  I, unfortunately, do not know enough about the flags to judge which color exactly is best suited for that name.  Sorry.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag
Talk:Barranquilla Carnival

message: I find the URL linked under "External Links" extremely problematic.  It is labeled as "Baranquilla Carnival" but its content is only secondarily about the topic.  I would appreciate any opinions on the appropriateness of its inclusion here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by User:MTBradley (talk • contribs) 
Hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.167.166 (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To me the current "Barraquilla's Carnival" does not seem right. I would think it better either "Carnival of Barranquilla" - as in the Unesco listing - http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/RL/carnival-of-barranquilla-00051 - and the "Carnival of Venice" or "Barraquilla Carnival" similar to other carnivals, such as Rio and Notting Hill. (Both those exist as redirects here). -- Beardo (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. SpacePod9 (talk) 12:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 
Talk:Exonuclease

message: Most of text about EcoIII that has been added to this article should go into its own. -- Boris 22:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Boris! This has now occurred. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  EcoIII 

message: Endonuclease has merged with Restriction endonuclease or Restriction enzyme, so I have removed endonuclease. Active contributor 05:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endonuclease 

message: I think it should be called DNA primer, not RNA primer. --Maximilianh 09:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is an RNA primer.  DNA-Poly can't get started without an RNA primer. --jorgeK  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.46.141 (talk) 15:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primers 

message: What's a watimoleculle?  It's in the description of exonuclease IV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.27.204 (talk) 02:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Watimoleculle" was a spelling mistake - this has been corrected. Thanks! Bibeyjj (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watimoleculle 

message: The reference used in regards to Xrn2's role in Pol II termination is actually a reference to Xrn2's role in Pol I termination. The statement is still correct, but reference needs to be changed 142.66.176.163 (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Problem
Talk:De Villiers Graaff

message: Discusssion moved to Graaff Baronets. - Kittybrewster  (talk) 06:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of the surname

message: The de Villiers name is in fact of French Huguenot origin. The "de" is French for "of" or "from". The progenitors of the de Villiers name in the South African region were  Pierre / Abraham / &  Jacques de Villiers from La Rochelle France who arrived in the Cape in 1689. Even before I learned this fact I have long known that de Villiers was a French name as I live in Quebec where there are a number of de Villiers (as there are in France & South Africa) & am fluent in French. The de Villiers name is one of the more easily recognizable French names. 
Some Afrikaans names of French origin such as Viljoen -from Villion- / Pienaar -from Pinard- / Cronje -from Cronier- & Nortje -from Nortier- are harder to recognize as French before learning the history of those specific names in the region. 
Names such as Joubert / Du Plessis / Terreblanche / Du Toit / Le Roux / Marais & Naudé are much easier to recognize as French names as they have retained their original French spelling.   
 Ron7 19:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The French Origin of the de Villiers Name