lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ageing

message: The authors of the hallmarks of aging have put out an update, please add info on/from it to the article. It's featured in 2023 in science like so:
In a paywalled review, the authors of a heavily cited paper on the hallmarks of aging update the set of proposed hallmarks after a decade (3 Jan). On the same day, a review with overlapping authors merge or link various hallmarks of cancer with those of aging.
It seems like some updates were already made on the longevitywiki but not here for some reason: https://en.longevitywiki.org/wiki/Hallmarks_of_aging
I already slightly edited the hallmarks of aging article.
----
Second issue: the article's scope overlaps with multiple other articles and some of its contents somewhat duplicate content elsewhere (/ may be outdated or incomplete).
Aging->Senescence↳Biomarkers of aging ↳Aging hallmarks ↳Life extension
What do you think about this? For now, I think the article is missing some contents and should link to the more detailed section with  wikilinks. There also is/was a merger proposal at Talk:Hallmarks of aging. Currently, the content is somewhat dispersed and not very well organized, in-sync, well-findable and complete.
I recently added some content to Senescence which also seem notable to briefly include here too and there probably is some additional missing content, mainly info Healthspan and Aging clocks/measurement in that article and content from Life extension#Strategies. At least for now I don't want to also update this article as well, please make some edits and/or comment.
 Prototyperspective (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update with new 'Hallmarks of aging' paper and solve article scope overlaps 

message: — Assignment last updated by Charliejo99 (talk) 21:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In future, please do not use Ageing or any other medical articles for coursework. It is irresponsible to have non-experts place medically misleading statements online. For example, I am removing the word "stroke" from the Introduction, as the (juvenile?)  editor is evidently ignorant of the fact that stroke is a cardiovascular disease. There are many more such problems which have been introduced after each year's "coursework". We medics cannot fix things fast enough before the next mistakes are entered. Thank you for your understanding. 37.5.242.95 (talk) 10:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023
Talk:Mazda MX-3

message: Worldwide Associations
*uk-mx3.com - UK Mazda MX-3 Community.
*MX-3.com - MX-3 Community site for Canada and USA.
*MX-West - MX-3 Enthusiasts of Western Canada & USA.
*MOCA (MX-3 Owners Club of Atlanta) - MX-3 Enthusiast Club in Atlanta, Georgia.
*Team Eunos Australia - Eunos Enthusiast Club in Australia.
*MX3-Forums.de - German MX-3 Forums.
*MX-3-community.de - Another German MX-3 Site.
*Mazda MX-3 Club Nederland - MX-3 Club In The Netherlands.
*Club MX-3 Quebec - MX-3 Club In Quebec, Canada.
*Mazda MX-3 Owners Club in Czech Republic - MX-3 Club In Czech Republic
* MX3ZONE BRASIL MX3ZONE - MX-3 in Brasil
*MX-3 CLUBE BRASIL MX-3 CLUBE - MX-3 in Brasil
*Modified Mazda - MX-3 Forum for USA and Canada
External links
*uk-mx3.com - UK Mazda MX-3 Community.
*MX-3.com
*MX6 Owners Club MX6 Owners club
*Mazda Autozam AZ-3
*MX-3 Photos
*mx3.cz - Czech Mazda MX3 Owners Club
*MX3ZONE BRASIL
*MX3CLUBE BRASIL
*Evilyeti.com - MX-3 Hatch Covers & Carbon Fiber Parts.
*Corksport.com - MX-3 Parts
These links were deleted a while ago. I'm placing them here in case they contain useful info. --Leedeth 23:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted external links

message: Unless the official trim level "GSR" exists within Mazda's internal or promotional nomenclature, I believe it should be removed or noted that a small number of "enthusiasts" use the term to differentiate their cars from the unmolested models.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.60.210.5 (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trim Designation? 
Talk:Yi Ik

message: I couldn't find any (used CC image search). There are some that appear to be variations of the same image. I guess there are no (surviving?) images of him that are in public domain? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No free image? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Seems like that is the consensus with no opposition. (non-admin closure)  Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 01:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 April 2023
Talk:People (magazine)

message: * 32nd GLAAD Media Awards
---Another Believer (Talk) 00:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award nomination 

message: There is a note that says, "The ratio, according to Variety, is 53% to 47%." What ratio? This note isn't tied to anything in the text. My initial inclination would have been to just delete the note, but perhaps someone can clarify it and tie it to the text it relates to. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What ratio? 

message: It is worth nothing that this account of People magazine does not note the lack or racial and gender diversity within their “Sexiest Men Alive”, “Sexiest Woman Alive”, or “100 Most Beautiful People” lists. It is only more recently (beginning with Denzel Washington in 1996, then beginning again in 2016 with Dwayne Johnson) that we are seeing people of color included in the list of “Sexiest Men Alive”; additionally, that there has only been one “Sexiest Woman Alive” is also an important thing to highlight within this article; that the woman is white and this only occurred in 2014 even more so. The same lack of diversity is within the list of “100 Most Beautiful People”; the overwhelming majority of which are white. It’s not until 2003 when Halle Berry is chosen that we see any kind of racial diversity. Even after Berry is chosen, the only other people of color on the list are Beyoncé (2012) and Lupita Nyong’o (2014). The editorial staff is also overwhelming white. In understanding the history of People magazine it’s important to note who has been featured and who has not by the magazine, especially considering their widespread viewing. This is not representative of a universal beauty standard; this is representative of a Western beauty standard. Beyond this apparent lack of diversity, what about the LGBTQIA+ representation within these lists and the people represented on their covers? ZMM03 (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historically Relevant Diversity 

message: ON THE COVER AND IN THE ARTICLE YOU REFER TO HER MAJESTY AS 'PRINCESS KATE' - DO YOU NOT KNOW HER REAL NAME IS 'CATHERINE' - AND 'KATE' IS MERELY A NICKNAME.....LISTEN TO KING CHARLES WHO ALWAYS REFERS TO HER AS PRINCESS CATHERINE.  IT JUST SEEMS YOU UNDERMINE HER AND HER TITLE BY NOT USING HER PROPER NAME......WISE UP PEOPLE MAGAZINE! 70.173.17.12 (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment:  Royal Princess Cover - April, 2024
Talk:Shangchuan Island

message: I've removed the line "Its name originated from São João ("Saint John" in Portuguese)." that you added in this edit in 2020, since the source you cited, World Trade Systems of the East and West: Nagasaki and the Asian Bullion Trade Networks, does not, in fact, make this claim. The names  and  are attested in Volume 79 of Da Ming Yitong Zhi, published by the Ming imperial court in 1461, before Francis Xavier was even born. That the Chinese pronunciation of  resembles Portuguese São João is probably just a coincidence. RcAlex36 (talk) 12:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name of the island
Talk:Freedomland (film)

message: IMDB has neither a Kevin N. Thomas, nor does its castlist for the film have a crowd boy. Deleting the credit. Bustter (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boy in crowd 

message: I don't know why, but I've reverted twice now someone changing the IMDB # to a different movie... Cburnett 00:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB # 
Talk:Articaine

message: it's not an advertisement; statements of increased usage are factual.--Jeff 04:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This looks like a standard local anesthetic preparation - carticaine as the anesthetic, and epinephrine to reduce bleeding. I'm not sure about the significance of the subject. Unless a case can be made for notability the article may well end up deleted.
Having said that, I see that articaine or carticaine, the active ingredient, are still missing an article. Maybe someone could have a stab at that. Pilatus 05:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject matter 

message: This article currently says "Articadent (Dentsply) became available in the United States in October of 2010" -- but today's date is 15 April 2010, so the date of October 2010 must be an error?  I'm new to editing Wikipedia, and I don't know what date should be here, so I'm not going to change this myself -- but we surely can't speak of October 2010 in the past tense, as of today. JeffSmith2010 (talk) 14:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Articadent (Dentsply) become available in the United States? 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support Pilatus 17:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting
Talk:The Mob (film)

message: Johnny Damico is not released from Bennion's custody because of the ballistics report. The report just happens to come in right after Lt. Banks says "Forget it, I'll take him down to headquarters." (It might have bolstered his case, though.) I've reflected this in the plot section. --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 05:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damico's release
Talk:4 World Trade Center

message: I am going to be expanding on this article and would like some pictures of 4 WTC. If anyone out there has some put them on here or send them to me and I'll put them on the page. Thank youRooney McFaddy (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures of 4 WTC

message: I'd like to fashion this article like the article for 7 World Trade Center. It is a format that may prove itself useful. | helpdןǝɥ | 01:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone fix the huge space between introductory paragraph and the table of contents?--Player072 (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge space 

message: The article is very detailed and retaliated to the actual building. The formatting is useful. Events and milestones in the building's follows the timeline of the building being constructed. Thank you fo the good read. --Lil Beastea (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation
Talk:5 World Trade Center

message: Wasn't there a J. Crew and a Disney Store in the lower levels? Were they still there on September 11th? -- SHODAN 05:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2006

message: I'd like to ask the editors of this article to help expand the above mentioned article and rephrase the section on the future of tower 5. The new tower will not occupy the same space as 5 WTC and should not be confused with this building. I'll work on it when I finish the other article. JRWalko 02:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to fashion this article like the article for 7 World Trade Center. | helpdןǝɥ | 00:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge section with [[World Trade Center Tower 5]]

message: 7 World Trade Center has been split, they've suggesting that Four World Trade Center should be split, what if we do split both the old and new 5 World Trade Center? we used to have an article on that, it has slight information on the old one, If we split them into two, it'd be better as we give more compressive information of both buildings. 120.28.226.197 (talk) 03:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split of both original and new buildings
Talk:6 World Trade Center

message: When was the building finally demolished?  There's a reference to a New York Times article, but not a link to that article.Jtyroler (talk) 00:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there no new building 6? Is it reserved for a future building?108.23.147.17 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  .There is no clearly defined 6 World Trade Center in the new World Trade Center master plan 

message: The explanation that the crater/hole was caused by WTC1 is unsourced, in fact photographs available here imply that it was caused by WTC7:
http://letsrollforums.com/wtc6-damage-analysis-originally-t20520.html?s=b5234541e413fc4fd1c78dea9718b6e7&
67.2.46.150 (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: ...of this building before September 11? Vcohen (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: my thoughts exactly.... PurpleChez (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody have an image... 

message: Hi,  
The 7th world trade center was a agreement with Britian and the Anglo American strenght and political power as an empire. The 8th world trade center  spawned from that and  is suppose to be a symbol of Americas strenght and political and international power independantly. There are only  seven symbols of  empire strenghts when the 6 world trade center is rebuilt. 8 symbolic symbols. 2603:6080:C200:207B:D14D:6BFD:4671:E055 (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  name number of worlfd trade centers
Talk:Sulfuryl chloride

message: preparation? supplier (probably Sigma-Aldrich)?  Its dissociation must be under fairly forcing conditions, because it appears to have a regular b.p. or does it boil with decomposition.  You might comment that this compound is often mistaken for thionyl chloride, a S(IV) cmpd that behaves quite differently.  And provide a link to SOCl2.It decomposition in water gives what?Smokefoot 04:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kendra

message: Wasn't this name made up in about 1950? It is just a couple of syllables brought together to make what sounds like a name.Perhaps a
father called Kenny + a mother called Sandra decided Ken[ny + San]dra = Kendra. All the derivation stuff is nonsense, isn't it? I'd like to see some citations for early use. Tsinfandel (talk) 15:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Made up

message: This name, just like all others, need a historical origin description not just a pop culture usage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.144.41 (talk) 14:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: origin

message: What is the sentence "The name was never popular in the United States, but the first person to ever have this name was a kid who lived in Germany 1987." actually supposed to mean? Clearly it cannot mean that this so-called kid was born in 1985. The linked site at reference 3 shows US entries of this name in the 50s. Also there is a link to the page of Kendra Wilkinson who was born in 1985.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muraenen (talk • contribs) 15:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: False information?

message: It sounds a lot like it was. MrLW97 (talk) 13:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female form of [[Kenneth]]?
Talk:Stridulation

message: I'm almost sure the audio sample, despite being named "Grasshopper.ogg", is actually a recording of katydid stridulation. Rulatir (talk) 04:27, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grasshopper/katydid confusion again? 

message: I think being the only stridulating mammal, it deserves a mention on this page. The Biblioklept (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenrecs
Talk:Graham Edwards (writer)

message: http://home.austarnet.com.au/tbeaudoin/ugefs (used to be an old, incomplete fansite, now defunct) has info on an upcoming fansite. Read the info there (screenshots also available). I'm looking for contributers and just general feedback. If anyone can help out, please leave a message on my talk page or just email me. Thanks :) - Tredanse 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: LovingDragoncharm.com is where the site will be. Right now there's a list of updates and info about email notification. - Tredanse 12:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fansite
Talk:Stone and Sky

message: http://home.austarnet.com.au/tbeaudoin/ugefs (used to be an old, incomplete fansite, now defunct) has info on an upcoming fansite. Read the info there (screenshots also available). I'm looking for contributers and just general feedback. If anyone can help out, please leave a message on my talk page or just email me. Thanks :) - Tredanse 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: LovingDragoncharm.com is where the site will be. Right now there's a list of updates and info about email notification. - Tredanse 07:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fansite
Talk:Stone and Sea

message: http://home.austarnet.com.au/tbeaudoin/ugefs (used to be an old, incomplete fansite, now defunct) has info on an upcoming fansite. Read the info there (screenshots also available). I'm looking for contributers and just general feedback. If anyone can help out, please leave a message on my talk page or just email me. Thanks :) - Tredanse 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: LovingDragoncharm.com is where the site will be. Right now there's a list of updates and info about email notification. - Tredanse 07:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fansite
Talk:Stone and Sun

message: http://home.austarnet.com.au/tbeaudoin/ugefs (used to be an old, incomplete fansite, now defunct) has info on an upcoming fansite. Read the info there (screenshots also available). I'm looking for contributers and just general feedback. If anyone can help out, please leave a message on my talk page or just email me. Thanks :) - Tredanse 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: LovingDragoncharm.com is where the site will be. Right now there's a list of updates and info about email notification. - Tredanse 07:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fansite
Talk:Debt consolidation

message: The article states that the current low for US Stafford student loan rates is 4.7%.  My rate is only 4.21% through Edsouth Financial services, and it is likely not the lowest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.216.253.87 (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in Student Loan section

message: Is there a source for the following claim?
:SLM Corporation (formerly Sallie Mae) does not report to Experian or Transunion, which means that students will have differing credit scores at Equifax, Transunion, and Experian.
TransUnion seems to know perfectly well about my Sallie Mae loans. Tyler 10:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of this statement

message: I was doing some reasearch on debt consolidation and I found a web site that has really great tips on how to go about consolidating debt it is:
debt-consolidation-insight.com/10tips1-3.php
I found it really useful. Check it out and lets talk about it.
Monkeyknowledge 05:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't look useful to me. It's just an affiliate link. -- zzuuzz(talk) 10:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Really Great Site

message: There is only one reference in the entire article, and for a very specific topic.  I'm not necessarily disputing the information present, but it requires citations to validate the information.  Halogenated (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References/citations 

message: Much of the article is written in a second person, how-to style. I suspect this problem will go away naturally when that material is replaced with sourced content.--Gimme danger (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: The US situation appears to be very different, judging from this article, but government-backed UK student loans have nothing to do with debt consolidation per se - you do not need to have any debt at all before taking a student loan. I don't think they are at all relevant to this article. I'll remove all references if no-one has any objections.  Stopthief (talk) 21:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Student Loans 

message: I was surprised to find it in the opening of the article. It makes no sense, cites nothing, and is quite frankly inappropriate. What "debt consolidation companies"? Who "buys" the loan, and for what "discount"? How does it change the debtor's "ability to discharge debts in bankruptcy" and why? I say, with years of experience in debt consolidation loans, this paragraph be removed:
"Sometimes, debt consolidation companies can discount the amount of the loan. When the debtor is in danger of bankruptcy, the debt consolidator will buy the loan at a discount. A prudent debtor can shop around for consolidators who will pass along some of the savings. Consolidation can affect the ability of the debtor to discharge debts in bankruptcy, so the decision to consolidate must be weighed carefully."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanbroox (talk • contribs) 02:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMHO this paragraph should be deleted in its entirety