lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dryocampa rubicunda

message: "Adorable"... Really?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.184.116.162 (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since this article was featured on reddit/imgur recently, and has been the target of a number of non constructive/spam attacks, should it be at least temporarily semi-protected? --2001:5B0:24FF:CF0:0:0:0:34 (talk) 04:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temp protection? 

message: As part of my Behavioral Ecology class at Washington University, I significantly expanded this page. I added to the lead section and expanded the life cycle section into several subsections. I also added several new relevant sections and ten new sources. EmilyKathryn (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as a heads up, you should really be mindful of WP:REFNAME, which says  -- it's confusing to see a ref named :0 or :1 while editing and not know what it refers to. Umimmak (talk) 21:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the Article 

message: Hey, this is a great article! It was very informative and well written. I made a couple minor grammatical edits by changing sentence structure and punctuation errors to reduce run-on sentences. I also added a couple links to other Wikipedia articles throughout the article to help the reader find information more efficiently. I would suggest slightly re-structuring the "Feeding" section and dividing it into two sections - one for larvae food and one for adult food. It is mentioned that adult rosy maple moths do not feed, but I would like to learn more about this in the adult feeding section. Additionally, I would suggest moving the last paragraph of the "Adult Life Cycle," and making it a separate subsection under "Physiology" or "Thermoregulation," and adding more information on body temperature regulation of the moth. Pranita.kaginele (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Pardonmebut, anyone can edit.VikingDrummer (talk) 02:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavioral Ecology Student - WikiProject
Talk:Hemaris

message: The photo marked "Hummingbird moth feeding on impatiens", and the species mentioned by Lwinklerls, is in fact a White-lined Sphinx, Hyles lineata. 
:You're right. Fixed.--72.200.197.225 (talk) 02:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hummingbird Moths Are Smart 

message: Is this guy a Hemaris?
Photo from Los Alamos, NM. I added a cool feeding photo to the article, but now I'm not sure he belongs here. 
Removed, I'm thinking he's a Hyles lineata variant. ID help appreciated, not a moth guy! TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 02:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species ID?
Talk:Queen (butterfly)

message: I have added information on Courtship/mating rituals and defense, specifically on the debate on whether the Queen serves as a model or a mimic. Thatgirlnamedsofa (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added section on Courtship/Mating, added new info on Defense

message: Hi! The article's looking good so far. I just added a new section on defense with approximately 170 words, and one new citation. It briefly mentions mimicry and is focused on how predators respond differently to the Queen butterfly based on its diet. NK2015 (talk) 16:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added new section on defense

message: Hello! I will be contributing to this article throughout the next couple months for a behavioral ecology class at WUSTL. I have already worked on the following sections: morphology, distribution + habitat, and food sources. I plan to add more sections on mating behavior and mimicry. Comments, critiques, and suggestions will be much appreciated! Thatgirlnamedsofa (talk) 01:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added morphology, distribution, and food/host plants sections 

message: Overall, this is a well-written and informative article. However, there are no references in the Life cycle section, which should be added before a Good Article nomination. For the purposes of this class, it may be a good idea to include a Behavior section, and bring all the behavioral information under this section.Abuatois (talk) 00:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: It could be nice to embed the photos within the article instead of just placing them in a secluded gallery at the end. All of the photos should have captions. The last sentence of the life cycle section seems out of place, this should not be a one sentence paragraph and is confusing what is meant by having multiple generations a year. Clarification and elaboration is needed.  This could be placed in the reproduction section. The grammar of the first sentence of the distribution and habitat section is confusing when referring to the new and old world. The threats section seems to be too short to stand by itself, I would combine it with the defense section, remove it, or greatly expand on it. For the flow of the article, the reproduction section could be placed ahead of life cycle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Batoburen (talk • contribs) 01:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review

message: Does anyone have a picture of its Chrysalis state? --Jamo58 (talk) 23:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrysalis picture 

message: The most important change I made to the article was expanding the lead section so it accurately and succinctly summarizes the main points of the article. Before, the lead didn’t really summarize the contents of the article. In addition, I added citations to information that hadn’t been cited and cleaned up some of the writing to make it clearer for the lay reader.Solon5g93 (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More edits

message: Is it really necessary to put parenthesis around the "butterfly" part? Booger-mike (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Paul Juon

message: I took the works list from the German article, but used an online translator (I don't know German).  If you do know German, please clean it up, and sorry for any errors made.P.L.A.R. 04:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: There are various ghits for 8 March 1872.  
Also, whichever date is the correct one, is it in the Gregorian or Julian calendar?  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  20:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: Basic information to add to this article:  at least a few words about the style of his music. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Townsend, Ontario

message: I have been to this town before. It has 4 lanes for traffic volume. it looks like you are coming into a big city only to be surprised by a little town! Worth visiting only if you are driving by...
- Anonymous
I have been to Townsend as a preschooler for summer camp there and I thought Townsend was going to be bigger than Simcoe. 15 years later, I'm in a high school history class and I learned that Townsend never grew. It stagnated because not enough people from Stelco were moving to this so-called "metropolis of Haldimand-Norfolk." Now the Townsend sign is rusty. Townsend is a big joke and Simcoe will have a population of at least 30000 people by 2027. Not Townsend, but Simcoe. And Simcoe will eventually have a maglev train line connecting it to Brantford, Woodstock, and Hamilton, Niagara Falls, Toronto, and beyond.
GVnayR 03:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Papilio paradoxa

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Papilio paradoxa → Papilio paradoxus — to unify swallowtail butterflies; according to discussion. Page "Papilio paradoxa" is to be deleted because of erroneous gender. Sorry about the inaccuracy. Mithril (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I would remove back to the incorrect gender, the correct name must be Papilio paradoxa. The name has consistently been used as Papilio paradoxa, the correctly declined name paradoxus has not been used in published lepidopteran sources (). Wikipedia is not the place to judge for correct gender application in lepidopteran nomenclature. The endings of the names should be kept untouched and should remain consistent with their usage in the published sources. It is known that lepidopteran nomenclature follows its own rules in that gender agreement is not applied as required by the ICZN Code.  -- FranciscoWelterSchultes (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:George and Elizabeth Peckham

message: According to her obituary, she died on Sunday, February 11, 1940. The original version of this article, however, listed her date of death as February 10, 1940. Since no source was provided for this information, I've changed it to the 11th. As obituaries commonly have mistakes, if anyone finds a better reference, feel free to change it back. Kaldari (talk) 18:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth Peckham death date 

message: This is a joint biography about a married couple of scientists whose work is essentially inseparable.  Per Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects (section WP:INCOMPATIBLE), redirects (but not the target article) should be categorized when the article title is incompatible with the category scope. George and Elizabeth Peckham is not a woman biologist, but  is. The primary redirects for both individuals are  and : these redirects should be categorized for individual aspects (birth & death years, etc.). Other redirects like  and  aid in searches and wikilinking, but should not be categorized to avoid redundancy. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirects and categories
Talk:Cossidae

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stygiella. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 30#Stygiella until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stygiella" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Danaus genutia

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Danaus genutia female in Kerala, India.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on . You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-10-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 20:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image from this article to appear as POTD soon 

message: The claimed range of 7 to 95 mm makes no sense.  I've corrected it to 70-95, since that is the most likely error.
--Sarabseth (talk) 03:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wingspan 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Common tiger (Danaus genutia genutia) male underside.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 7, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-04-07. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Common tiger (Danaus genutia genutia) male underside.jpg scheduled for POTD
Talk:Dingy skipper

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan (2007) species—GRM 15:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 
Talk:Dryadula phaetusa

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Dryadula phaetusa 2 Richard Bartz.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 29, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-09-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:44, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Dryadula phaetusa 2 Richard Bartz.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:El Segundo blue

message: hi my name is ana add me on myspace kk thaanx
no  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.183.146 (talk) 03:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: don't really know but i'll find out
sorry for the inconvenience  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.183.146 (talk) 03:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Papilio palinurus

message: There are several images in the gallery which simply show this butterfly, wings outspread. Is there any particular reason why we should have more than one dorsal view, one ventral view of the adult? We are missing images of other life-cycle stages, however. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Some duplicates have been removed (twice). Dger (talk) 00:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar images in gallery
Talk:Erebiola

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Speedy moved to Erebiola per nom.  No such user (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Erebiola butleri →  – Monotypic genus, WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. Prosperosity (talk) 02:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 October 2022
Talk:Euploea klugii

message: This article is really written in technical language and could use some translation for the layman and easier reading. --DanielCD (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Point noted. Will try to add simpler descriptions along with detailed descriptionas as has been done in Papilio demoleus. AshLin (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Euthalia lubentina

message: size of  euthalia lubentina 152.57.170.72 (talk) 15:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: colour of euthalia lubentina 152.57.170.72 (talk) 15:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: age of  euthalia lubentina 152.57.170.72 (talk) 15:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: who invented the  euthalia lubentina 152.57.170.72 (talk) 15:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: in which year 152.57.170.72 (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   euthalia lubentina
Talk:Gatekeeper (butterfly)

message: The last sentence in the lead reads "A similar species is the Meadow Brown, especially in the female sex, which likes to rest with closed wings however, especially the far less active females." Can somebody tell me what that's supposed to mean? It looks like four clauses randomly strung together with a "however" thrown in for good measure. Richerman (talk) 22:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical sentence 

message: I reorganized some of the information under similar species and subspecies and added a heading. I also moved the "etymology" section farther up. The behavior section was good; further information could be on predator/prey relationships.
Wmhua (talk) 15:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Edits for Class

message: Pyronia tithonus occurs over much of Europe but this article gives the impression that it is a British & Irish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.207.145.188 (talk) 11:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  British bias 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Gatekeeper (Pyronia tithonus) underside.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 10, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-04-10. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 16:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Gatekeeper (Pyronia_tithonus)_male_2.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 10, 2025. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2025-04-10. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 16:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Chinese mantis

message: thumb|left|Brown sub-adult female Chinese Mantis
In this picture the yellow spot is pale.  In real life it is yellower.  Can somebody get a better picture of the yellow spot and replace this picture?
24.163.64.180 (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Better picture of the spot

message: Chinese Mantis is its common name and the WikiProject Mantodea suggest that the species in articles are to be named by their Scientific name. 
Happy1892 (talk) 01:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name

message: Hello.  I have been in South Korea and caught and raised mantids like Tenodera sinensis from there.  I have read that they were Tenodera aridifolia but I guess that could easily not be updated and it is Tenodera sinensis.  Does anybody know if the ones in South Korea are T. aridifolia or T. sinensis?  They call them "King Mantids" in korean.  It seems like the ones in Japan are Tenodera aridifolia ssp. aridifolia.  The adult females were about 95mm long (bigger than the Tenodera sinensis around here in North Carolina) without much variation but sorry, I did not measure the males.  Thank you.  :)
Happy1892 (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This mantis in korea?

message: The Kamacuras article suggestes that Japanese giant mantis is another name for Tenodera sinensis. Can anyone confirm or refute that, so that we can either include the alternative name here or correct the other article? Thanks a lot! Daranios (talk) 11:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese giant mantis

message: This mantis shown in this image is not a Chinese Mantis. I am not familiar with Wikipedia's rules regarding the removal of images so I leave this up to to those of you who do to properly handle it. Cheers. 72.240.100.87 (talk) 10:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This mantis in this picture has been incorrectly identified
Talk:Geranium bronze

message: This page is looking good! I changed the physiology section to description and moved it to the top of the article, distributed the photos from the gallery to other parts of the article, added a photo of a host plant, and made some other style/grammar edits. Like Jennifer said, I would clear up the migration section; it would maybe work better with the title of "flight" if the butterfly doesn't actually migrate? I think the food resources category could also be combined with the parental care category, since both are talking about the same things just in slightly different contexts. Good luck! Lilymalcolm (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: More Edits and Suggestions

message: Hi, you're page seems pretty good :) So, I mainly made changes to a lot of the wording of the article. Many sentences were constantly beginning with the same subjective word (i.e. “the Geranium bronze..” or “the butterfly”). Also, I had some suggestions here!
i.	Migration section: 1. can you make it clearer as to whether or not the butterflies actually migrate? Are they migrating from South Africa or is it considered “migrating” if they were actually carried by humans? 2. Slightly confused as to where they are flying form South Africa… are they trying to leave the cold weather?
ii.	Predator section: 1. Are there Geranium plants in South Africa at all? Is that a possibility as to why they are not pests in native home? Also, maybe adding specific predators, if you have the information?
iii.    Also, I added another paragraph to the end of the "predator of plants" section, discussing possible economic problems that arose due to these butterfly predations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenniferra (talk • contribs) 03:33, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions/Edits

message: Hi, I thought your page was great, but it lacked a lot of links to other pages when words that aren't common were used. I added these links, and I fixed some grammatical issues and some sentences that I thought were confusing. Great job!Lily1004 (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: ...is available on the other language versions of this article—GRM (talk) 21:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information... 
Talk:Joe Cowley

message: Shouldn't it mentioned somewhere that he is retarded? He is retarded, right? In the past week has has "written" that Mark Buhrle was a) going to be traded to the Red Sox. b) signed to an extension. c) no extension but a "Friday deadline" for the "likely extension". and d) Talks are dead. 
I find it commendable that the Sun-Times hired their White Sox beat writer through the Make-a-Wish foundation, but shouldn't they have someone, at least, proofread his ramblings? 
Which now looking back were all correct in the end. I am sorry. I am an idiot.
The part about being traded to the Red Sox was "correct in the end"? Please explain. The talks were dead was correct? Please explain.
Bad choice Cowley.
Saying that Morneau would have won if Jeter had been first is misleading, because it's provided that Morneau had been second.  If Cowley had been reasonable, and placed the far more deserving Joe Mauer ahead of Morneau while putting Jeter first, Jeter would have won.  Also, someone should note Cowley didn't include Mauer at all, but did have AJ Pierzynski 10th on his ballot.  This is probably the worst ballot in the history of MVP voting.
That's for sure, I didn't know he left out Delgado in the 2003 MVP voting.
I hate this man.  So does everyone, right?  We should add a section about how everyone hates him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.112.59 (talk) 04:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graphium evemon

message: This article is missing a lot of information about the butterfly, such as synonymous names (eg Papilio evemon).  In addition, the native range may be inaccurate; the Graphium evemon is known to exist in both Indonesia and Malaysia.  This stub would benefit from the addition of a basic description of the organism, more/better photos, and a greater number of sources to reference. Cipherbug (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled