Talk:Drudkh

message: Based on my limited knowledge of Sanskrit, "Drudkh" certainly does not sound like a Sanskrit word (but it does sound very Ukrainian).  Where does this come from?  I've heard it elsewhere but it doesn't seem right. -Egendomligt 11:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the sanskrit word for wood and/or wooden objects is "dru". I have no idea where from did the band members get their version, maybe from an old or inaccurate dictionary? The fact is, that we can't say for sure that this is a flaw or misspelling. 88.156.24.124 19:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Drudkh's Encyclopedia Metallum page now says "Drudkh" means "tree" in Sanskrit, but how much we can rely on EM's info is discutable, of course. Boooooooomblastandruin 15:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

text: http://spokensanskrit.de also states that "dru" or "druma" is a Sanskrit word for "tree". Drudkh could well be derived from it. JJohannes (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanskrit? 

message: I'll delete it, or put it somewhere else in the article, actually Autumn Aurora is the most famous record. I putted a band box and uploaded the logo instead of just the swan road cover, which is poor quality. Darksteel 18:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swan Road? 

message: Drudkh isn't Ukrainian word. Egendomligt, you may trust me because I'm Ukrainian ;) This word sounds very similar to russian and ukrainian "drug" without "kh" (transcription - [drug], in english - friend).— Preceding unsigned comment added by  11:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greetings from Ukraine ;) 

message: :Image:Drudkh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Drudkh.jpg

message: that's not neutral:
:Roman Saenko, the leading member of Hate Forest, and one of the most fruitful composers and lyric writers in the metal scene;
-- 141.3.74.35 (talk) 21:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  npov 

message: Who got the idea that they already recorded a new album? I can't find anything on it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.150.25 (talk) 21:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New album? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Drudkh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090821185147/http://www.season-of-mist.com:80/light/index.php?action=news to http://www.season-of-mist.com/light/index.php?action=news&title=A+PIECE+OF+DRUDKH%27S+COSMOS
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Drudkh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080622204608/http://www.season-of-mist.com/light/index.php?action=news_all to http://www.season-of-mist.com/light/index.php?action=news_all&title=NEW+SIGNING&date=10%2F08%2F2008
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Stepan Bandera was a prisoner in a Nazi concentration camp, and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army was actively fighting the Nazis.
«Ethnic Cleansing» refers in general to the army of Savur; Bandera at that time was sitting in a concentration camp and could not give any orders. Bandera's Ukrainian Insurgent Army did not control the lands of the places of clashes with the Poles and Polish Armia Krajowa at all.
Moreover, it was Bandera who was opposed to an alliance with the Germans, when Melnik, for example, saw an alliance with Germany as the only chance to defeat the Communists. Bandera's Ukrainian Insurgent Army actively fought Melnyk's Ukrainian Insurgent Army. And there was the Ukrainian Insurgent Army of Borovets. Attributing the actions of one army to another is the level of the yellow press, not Wikipedia.
For Ukrainians, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army is an army that fought against communist and Nazi invaders.
Russian politicians, who annexed Crimea and eastern Ukraine, attribute fascism to the Ukrainian war of liberation, thus justifying the killing of Ukrainians.
--Synyća Vusata (talk) 08:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribute fascism to Stepan Bandera and Ukrainian Insurgent Army is nonsense 

message: The content in the 'Controversy' section is so outright crazy, false and biased - that one can only wonder how it could have found its place in a Wiki article.
The topic is supposed to be about a music band - and the content in the article goes on to present readers with the Kremlin war propaganda instead.
The only solution is to delete it entirely - there is no sense in discussing crazy stuff irrelevant to the article, thus promoting the agenda.
I've tried to do just that - but the moderator proved to be a supporter of Kremlin propaganda (for who knows what reasons)
User_talk:Tuodagloriam
I don't have time to waste on proving the evident things to biased and arrogant moderators like the first one I've met here.
It's just a shame...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuodagloriam (talk • contribs) 10:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crazy claims and irrelevant Kremlin propaganda in the 'Controversy' section