lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yad Vashem

message: {{tmbox
| type  = notice
| image = 
| text  =  article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
{{#if:While there are substantial similarities between this book and our article, evidence suggests they took it from us rather than the other way around. We had the content prior to the publication of their book, and their book credits Wikipedia and licenses it accordingly in section "7 About This Book". Good to investigate, but we seem to be in the clear on this one. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:41, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

message: I have seen claims circulating on social media that Yad Vashem was supposedly built on top of the remains of a depopulated Palestinian village, but searches on Google reveal nothing. Maybe they are referring to Deir Yassin, but that was located to the south of Yad Vashem, not beneath it. Any truth to this claim or is it simply misinfo? Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 13:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palestinian village? 

message: Please, supplement 
> Sculpture by Kosso Eloul, 1960, bronze
> The Hall of Remembrance, YadVashem.org; Kosso Eloul,
The Israel Museum, Jerusalem; 1960 Ner Tamid (The Eternal Flame), Yad VaShem, KossoEloul.net
to
 Welt-der-Form (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  +sculptor of "The Eternal Flame" 

message: :
Customarily, brackets mark words that are implied but not present in the source.  If that is so for all of these, one my question how the name Yad Vashem was taken from this verse! –Tamfang (talk) 01:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  virtual words 

message: Change "Yom HaShoah, vommemoration day in Israel" to "Yom HaShoah, commemoration day in Israel." Minor typo should be fixed please and thank you. 21Helios12 (talk) 04:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thank you for taking the time to request this typo be corrected.  —Sirdog (talk) 04:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 November 2023 

message: Please make the following change to the article:
 StativStakitKasket (talk) 09:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 May 2024
Talk:Bugge Wesseltoft

message: Content deleted as it was copied from http://www.jazzlandrec.com/bugge_bio.html
Karl Naylor 11:53, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pinkham's Grant, New Hampshire

message: ..so, this is a ghost-town?.. -80.133.108.214 04:16, 7 March 2004
:I don't think so; I don't think it was ever an inhabited town in the first place. Cooljeanius 13:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll notice the population used to be above zero, most recently at the 2010 census. Those numbers would be associated with the AMC buildings at the base of the Tuckerman Ravine trails and whether any workers living there at the time were counted as residents by the Census. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghost Town?

message: The map shows Low and Burbank's Grant, my knowledge of Wikipedia is too limited to know how to fix it :P  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.119.158.130 (talk) 01:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! Luckily someone had already made a map; I just had to guess its name. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong map
Talk:Oil Springs Reservation, Allegany County, New York

message: I have to confess: I am really disgusted with these demographic nonsense in Wikipedia.
Here it is more than obvious: 
it has a population of 9!
it´s an indian reservation with NO indian!
Either this obvious fact is interesting, then tell us the story.
Or it is not, then omitt it!
:Encyclopedia's aren't about telling stories, they are about stating facts.  I'll agree that the demographic stuff looks a bit odd on small towns, but it's better than nothing.  Treznor 21:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

message: What is the reason for having this and the other exta article on the reservation? Shouldn't the main article (Oil Springs Reservation) just about cover everything? They are not separate reservations. Backspace (talk) 23:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for two extra articles?
Talk:STS-47

message: I am including the fact that it has been rummored that Davis and Lee (a married couple)possibly had sex on board the space shuttle on this flight. This blog entry gives the entire story: http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2007/02/has_it_been_don.html Dreammaker182 (talk) 04:14, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've reverted because blogs are NOT reliable sources and are explicitly not allowed per WP:V. -MBK004 06:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex Rumor. 

message: One thing that's shocked me is that this article contains plagiarized info from NASA's fact sheets & mission archives about STS-47, specifically the majority of the first paragraph and the entirety of the third, fourth, and fifth in the mission highlights section, were ripped directly from the NASA mission summary published in the external links section. While the source has been linked, there are no inline citations where the source came from, and while I believe information a public agency like NASA publishes on the internet is in the public domain, outright plagiarism like this has never been allowed on Wikipedia to my knowledge, and it's never a good practice. This information was first posted by the article's creator 17 years ago, and I'm astonished that it hasn't been changed since. Other articles started by the same creator have been edited from the basic NASA factsheets, and some have even gone on to become featured articles on the English Wikipedia. I feel like this issue is too big for a casual editor like myself to solve, so I'm wondering if perhaps more invested Wikipedia editors or perhaps the more active users in this article's categories can try to fix the issues here, since I would like to see this article remain and preferably not have to be deleted and made again from scratch. The people who served on STS-47 and those who worked to make it possible deserve a better article about their scientific and engineering accomplishments.
Sorry for the long rant.
SpacePod9 (talk) 23:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rampant Plagiarism untouched since 2004 - Improvements in Progress 

message: These are links for quality references regarding some of the experiments done on this mission, for future editors. SpacePod9 (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The only oral histories I could find for any crew members are Robert Gibsons:
* https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/oral_histories/GibsonRL/GibsonRL_4-10-18.pdf
* https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/oral_histories/GibsonRL/GibsonRL_10-14-20.pdf
Another AIAA paper about Spacelab-J, published before launch. SpacePod9 (talk) 07:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science Article Links
Talk:Charles C. Krulak

message: : He was Commandant of the Marine Corps, not just "normal career". — ERcheck (talk) 00:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems so.  See  — ERcheck (talk) 01:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mount Tambora

message: The eruption occurred in April 1815, but the Northern Hemisphere "year without a summer" was 1816. This suggests that the global distribution of ash and dust took more than 3 months; otherwise 1815 would (also) be notable as much cooler than normal. Can anyone clarify the spread and dissipation timeline, at least in terms of weather records? Martindo (talk) 21:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time of Year
Talk:Horace Donisthorpe

message: Gosh....that´s REALLY encyclopedic.....
----
What's with all the indecipherable acronyms and abbreviations on this page? Why not spell them all out? PMcM 01:28, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I hate the tendency to use abrvtns.  Not everyone knows that the "Quart. J. Math. Oxford" is the "Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Oxford Series", for example.  Dbenbenn 02:17, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Managed to to figure out the important ones I think, and 'edit' into oblivion a few of the others. I think it looks better as it is now, but won't mind of some of what I purged creeps back in. PMcM 02:19, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: &c. is an older way of writing etc.  See et cetera.  Dbenbenn 00:33, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vietnam Veterans Memorial

message: To Whom It May Concern:
I am a veteran of the Vietnam Conflict, having served in the Air Force from 1970 - 1974.  Please be advised that this was never a declared war, but is categorized as a "conflict".  Please correct your pages on the Vietnam Conflict, for the peace of mind of all who served during this troubling times.  It will be much appreciated.
P.Meeder, Sgt, USAF 2601:283:4C81:ACB0:21C1:9578:C5C8:8A59 (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added link to this discussion @ Talk:Vietnam War as it may affect that article also.  - FlightTime (open channel) 21:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The common historical shorthand name for the conflict is Vietnam War (regardless of its status as a declared war). I don't see that changing any time soon. Intothatdarkness 01:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viet Nam "War" 

message: Please discuss here instead of repeatedly reverting the section in question. GLORIOUSEXISTENCE (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Guy episode mention
Talk:Employment Equity

message: Have redirected article to Affirmative action, as it's really just another name for the same thing. Note that the affirmative action article is also listed as an NPOV debate. Bearcat 23:10, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affirmative action 

message: The page in BEE should not be merged with a page in Employment Equity... BEE is an overarching process of which Employment Equity is only a part. to merge them would be to misunderstand what BEE is about.
I agree. Jesus geek 01:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Employment Equity
Talk:Huntington

message: Does anyone object to moving Huntington, West Virginia up the list? It seems to be by far the largest Huntington, save Huntington Beach, California (although I figure that people looking for that city would inslude "beach" in the search) and the most likely intended target of a search for Huntington. I do stop short of moving this article to Huntington (disambiguation) at this time and making this a redirect, but it may be worth discussion at some point.  youngamerican (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  bumping [[Huntington, West Virginia]] up the list
Talk:Flag of Alaska

message: Eight stars of gold on field of blue... The Big Dipper is really out of whack on this graphic. I think the stars are all the same size as well.  -- Decumanus 18:05, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Which one are you referring to? There are cases of different states coming up with identical solutions. -DevinCook (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag Accuracy

message: The Russian American Company flag was authorized under Czar Alexander I in 1806. It was the first special flag granted by the Russian Government to any private company. The proposal to establish the flag was submitted by the Minister of Trade N. P. Rumiantsev, who devoted much attention to the Company and personally financed several scientific expeditions. (Port Rumiantsev, the Russian shipping and harbor facility at Bodega Bay was later named for him.) The flag was granted on September 19, 1806 by the St. Petersburg offices. The RAC flag was authorized to be raised over Russian fortifications and on Company ships in place of naval flags. This gave special recognition to the Company in the international trade world.
The flag flew over all Russian American Company settlements, including Fort Ross.  The RAC flag has three stripes, the lower red, the middle blue, and the upper and wider stripe white. Painted on the flag is the Russian imperial crest, the double headed eagle.  A ribbon hanging from the talons of the eagle is the inscription ‘Russo-American Company.’  On the breast of the double headed eagle is a square with a red shield and St. George on a white steed looking to the left. Between 1818 and 1831 a professional artist was hired by the Company specially to make and draw the emblem on the flags. The Company used six to ten flags annually.
Flags were probably flown on a daily basis at the Ross Colony and in Alaska. Certainly, they were always flown for special occasions such as the arrival of ships and visiting dignitaries, and celebrations of any sort.
The flag flew over Alaska until October 18th, 1867 when all Russian American Company holdings in Alaska were sold to the United States.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by UeArtemis (talk • contribs) 20:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Old Flag
Talk:List of cognitive biases

message: "Fluency Heuristic" or similar appears to be missing from the list.
In contrast to the "Rhyme as Reason", the Fluency Heuristic applies to a wider set of statements beyond those that rhyme but also have an increased ease of cognitive processing (eg catchphrases), as is supported by the information on the page dedicated to the Fluency_heuristic.  Thus, it appears to be an omission on the main list of cognitive biases.
Suggest adding it in the List of cognitive biases#Truthiness section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minogully (talk • contribs) 19:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of Fluency Heuristic 

message: Doesn't seem to be included - maybe I missed it. Could start with this paper on Motion, identity and the bias toward agency. Shtove (talk) 08:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Could this be a synonym of agent detection bias? Paradoctor (talk) 12:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agency bias 

message: (Apologies, this was posted on the wrong talk page. Now moved here.) MartinPoulter (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-published encyclopedia
Talk:1924

message: February 12 and 22 both say: "Calvin Coolidge becomes the first President of the United States to deliver a political speech on radio"....which is the real date? Kingturtle 19:26, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coolidge 

message: Does anyone have an opinion on whether Robert N. Cronk, born five seconds after midnight on 1/1/24 and therefore the first American baby born in that year, deserves inclusion on either the events or the births list? I don't think it does. If we were to include him, we'd as a matter of principle need to include the same people for every country in every year for which we have the info, which just seems absurd given that all or nearly all such people are not notable. But I reverted it once and it got added back. Everyking 22:11, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Far too trivial for an encyclopedia article about major world events. Qzm (talk) 17:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First birth of year 

message: Isn't this a pretty major event that occured in 1924? Could someone please add it and when it was passed if this is an acceptable noteworthy event? 169.229.121.94 01:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Immigration Act of 1924]]

message: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 16:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Nope, 1924 was the 4th year of the 1920s decade. Sausagea1000 (talk) 16:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Count: 1920, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 22:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. Sausagea1000 (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: ADD MORE! PLEASE! 2601:181:401:49B0:D183:46DD:F971:7EE0 (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add more citations! 

message: Shouldn't the "crime of the century" be listed for 1924? Leopold and Loeb murdering Bobby Franks. 96.241.16.150 (talk) 15:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hardly the crime of the century. I can think of several dozen that are more memorable. Deb (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what it was called at the time. In any case, it's a famous case that involved Clarence Darrows. Books, documentaries, and movies are still be made about it. It's seem worthy of note for this year. 96.241.16.150 (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it's not exactly internationally notable. I'm guessing the court case is more notable than the actual crime. Deb (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leopold and Loeb
Talk:Tahoma (typeface)

message: I turned this article into a disambiguation page to clear up some of the mess in the article. Max naylor 15:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This sight sucks...it gave me absolutely no information that i wanted. You need to give up and never make another page. MS Sans Serif for its system font. --Kuroki Mio 2006 22:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tahoma is not used in [[Windows ME]] 

message: Tahoma is a humanist sans-serif typeface designed by [...]
What is a humanist typeface? --Abdull 08:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humanist 

message: Does anyone know the license of the linked font?
I didn't find anything on the Microsoft website. Would be nice to note it here, so people can see if it is legal for them to download and use the font.
--Gnypsl (talk) 09:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No - http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fonts/font.aspx?FID=19&FNAME=Tahoma says that it is an ascender font - See EULA http://www.ascenderfonts.com/info/EULA.aspx Rombust (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  License of the linked font? 

message: Tahoma is not the default font on Facebook (even though it may have been in the past). The correct default font is Lucida Grande. --24.241.49.184 (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Lucida Grande is default for Mac OS X, and Tahoma for Windows and Linux.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolzrock (talk • contribs) 17:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of Tahoma on Facebook
Talk:South Ossetia

message: The first paragraph seems to have a bias towards a certain status of the country. It doesn't accurately portrays it because it seems to make the idea that South Ossetia is practically a recognized state, with no mention otherwise in the first paragraph. The info about non-recognition starts in the second paragraph below, which doesn't really provide proper balance, specially when the country is only recognized by very few countries. I tried reflecting this by changing "partially recognised" to "mostly unrecognised" but such change was manually reverted by User:Kashmiri. Regards, --Thinker78 (talk) 23:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragrph needs more NPOV

message: @Nikkimaria, why do you think that the status field is not the right place to say that only 5 countries recognise South Ossetia? This is not covered elsewhere in the infobox. There is nothing in the description at Template:Infobox_country that contradicts it. Alaexis¿question? 15:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That parameter is used to describe the country's status in the sense of whether it is a territory or dependency, not to enumerate its recognition by other countries. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: i agreed with your change here, however it would be nice for that to be clarified on the template doc. perhaps a discussion at Template talk:Infobox country to iron it out would be good ... sawyer * he/they * talk 00:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Well, I still think it's worth mentioning it and that it's a good place to do  it but overall it's not that important. Alaexis¿question? 12:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox status
Talk:Image

message: The definition given relies on an online etymological dictionary and is at odds with the mention of Bergman’s use of colour to represent ‘the human soul’. So to limit it to images “that look like a person or thing” overlooks the representation of abstract concepts. Since almost no references are provided, the article consists of sweeping, unsupported statements and has no authority. Mental image is an article which conveys some of the complexity which should be dealt with here, and points to some of the references that might be used, though even that merely scratches the surface. What does one learn in reading this article?  Jamesmcardle(talk) 23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this -- it seems that this article is trying to describe several different concepts under the same umbrella (e.g. conflating the physical/digital reproduction of images with the concept of a mental image), resulting in a wordy mess. ARoseThorn (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstraction
Talk:Communal reinforcement

message: Shouldn't this page be merged with groupthink Andries 20:23, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: * Ghosts
* Hypnosis
* Race (human classification to subspecies according to morphological features)
* God
* The devil
* Demons
* Angels
* Hell
* Heaven
* Infalibility of the Pope
* transubstantiation
* reincarnation
* the soul
* destiny and predestination
* kharma
* auras
* synchronicity
* out-of-body experiences
* psychic abilities
* past-life regression
* astrology and horoscopes
* communicating with the dead
* tarot cards
* witchcraft and spells
* divination
* psychic mediums
* augurs
* virgin births
* psychic surgery
* faith healing
* tea leaf reading
* palm reading
* crystal ball gazing
* stigmata
Whoever put this together is apparently giving their own personal opinion, that all the bullet points above have no basis in reality. People merely keep telling each other that these things are true.
Well, the contributor might be correct, but our readers aren't interested in opinions -- unless they are attribute to specific sources. No fair saying "considered to be..." --Uncle Ed 18:57, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: A lot of personal opinion 

message: Are we clear that "the avoidance of bathing in Medieval Europe" is a fact, and if it is, that it is a sufficiently general fact as to warrant such a generalised statement?  Or indeed, that bathing under either mediaeval European (in general) or modern global (in general) circumstances is sufficiently safe or advantageous to warrant the implication that avoidance is  (in general) socially harmful?
n.b. "untrue" is a little ambiguous here.
Anihl (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baths 

message: I tried to add List_of_common_misconceptions to the see also, but it appears like a broken link, even though when you click it it takes you to the article.  I don't know how to fix this.--Jeiki Rebirth (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Trouble with See Also

message: "Community reinforcement" is not "communal reinforcement", even though the two are related. The "community reinforcement" section seems overly specific and out of place in this article. I would like to remove that section or move it into its own article. Any support / objections? --24.185.86.218 (talk) 03:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does "community reinforcement" actually belong here?
Talk:2004 Greek legislative election

message: Tweedle Dum (ND) seem to have beaten Tweedle Dee (PASOK) by 5%, according to the BBC.
Meanwhile Jorg Haider has been re-elected Governer of Carinthia... and the SPO have won big in Salzburg.
Al
The correct English name for "Alliance" is something else, starting with SYN. See Politics of Greece. It would be cool if someone could join both articles in one way or the other, or at least crosslink them. -- till we *) 15:34, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled