Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/MONGO/Evidence

message: I offer no argument to the facts presented by JzG, except for one point.  I do not currently harbour any resentment toward the deletion of the article.  My issue regarding the deletion had everything to do with how the article was deleted, and I'd have no further argument if the AfD and DRV were handled in a proper manner.  Even with those disagreements, I did not bring the matter to ArbComm as I had considered doing following the deletion review, and only bring it up here as a statement of evidence, some surrounding evidence of which I have yet to present.  Whatever one cares to label my association with ED as at the time of the conflict, and perhaps my defense held less water than it would have if I didn't have a prior association, I don't feel my defense was without merit, I do believe the process was ignored for the sake of eliminating an article that some wish didn't exist, and I'd like to think that my actions involving the situation (in terms of following the proper procedures) would speak for themselves.  As a named person in this matter, it would be lax of me not to present evidence as to what occurred, and it would be improper of me to deny the facts as I know them. --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to JzG evidence 

message: *User:Iicatsii may also be an editor at ED. A user by the same name here at Wikipedia, was upgraded to sysop/checkuser on the ED website on August 8, 2006.,  The ED editor by this name has edited the attack article about me on ED, adding a link to my userpage here at Wikipedia.--MONGO 19:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to Badlydrawnjeff evidence 

message: I offer no argument to the facts presented by JzG, except for one point.  I do not currently harbour any resentment toward the deletion of the article.  My issue regarding the deletion had everything to do with how the article was deleted, and I'd have no further argument if the AfD and DRV were handled in a proper manner.  Even with those disagreements, I did not bring the matter to ArbComm as I had considered doing following the deletion review, and only bring it up here as a statement of evidence, some surrounding evidence of which I have yet to present.  Whatever one cares to label my association with ED as at the time of the conflict, and perhaps my defense held less water than it would have if I didn't have a prior association, I don't feel my defense was without merit, I do believe the process was ignored for the sake of eliminating an article that some wish didn't exist, and I'd like to think that my actions involving the situation (in terms of following the proper procedures) would speak for themselves.  As a named person in this matter, it would be lax of me not to present evidence as to what occurred, and it would be improper of me to deny the facts as I know them. --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to JzG evidence 

message: *User:Iicatsii may also be an editor at ED. A user by the same name here at Wikipedia, was upgraded to sysop/checkuser on the ED website on August 8, 2006.,  The ED editor by this name has edited the attack article about me on ED, adding a link to my userpage here at Wikipedia.--MONGO 19:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to Badlydrawnjeff evidence