lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Eve of St. Agnes

message: A central question not discussed in the article is: did they suffer the pangs of unrequited love, or did they actually get it on when "the rose melted into the violet," before she said "Alas! This is no dream!" Edison 04:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well considering Keats' relationship with Fanny, I think the much richer reading is one where they don't "get it on" as you phrase it. -FM (talk) 22:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I've removed that stuff about the rape. It's not relevant to the poem. Yes, the original text survives. Paul B (talk) 19:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The article seems pretty cut and dry that Madeline and Porphyro are already in love, however the poem itself is much more circumspect as to whether or not it was a willing copulation; when she first sees him, for example; 
 
    "There was a painful change, that nigh expell’d
    The blisses of her dream so pure and deep
    At which fair Madeline began to weep,"
Believing him to be part of her dream, she relates how the real him does not live up to her expectations;
    “Ah, Porphyro!” said she, “but even now
    “Thy voice was at sweet tremble in mine ear,
    “Made tuneable with every sweetest vow;
    “And those sad eyes were spiritual and clear:
    “How chang’d thou art! how pallid, chill, and drear!
Or when he informs her that this is not a dream, she responds unhappily, aware of the consequences of his being with her, alone and naked, in her bedroom.
    “This is no dream, my bride, my Madeline!”
    (...)
    “No dream, alas! alas! and woe is mine!"
The final line suggests that, although she may love him and be willing to marry him, the idea of pre-marital sex to her, a lady before our more liberal age, is not something she would wish to go through with. I'm not saying this is the only reading of the poem, but I definitely feel it would be worth mentioning.Himynameishelen (talk) 10:41, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I feel the article should include reference to how the poem echoes Romeo and Juliet (two "star-crossed lovers" whose families are against one another.) Porphyro is even called "A famish’d pilgrim," which would follow from a line in the Shakespeare. Himynameishelen (talk) 10:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: rape?
Talk:Potter Park Zoo

message: Galleries are generally discouraged since we now point to Commons (see WP:Galleries#Image_galleries). The photos should be placed in the article body if they are directly relevant to the text. Otherwise the user can go to Commons using the link provided. The USGS picture is redundant with coordinates and should probably be removed (the coordinates can be set pretty precisely to get the picture you want). "Notes" and "References" seems to be the preferred titles instead of "References" and Works cited", with "Works cited" being used mostly in author biographies, but this also seems to be one of thee hot button issues on Wikipedia. I have added a citation for the AZA list (and removed the now redundant See also link). I put it down in Reflist to show how citations can all be collected in one place. This is initially a bit tedious to do, but makes the text a lot easier to read when editing, and puts all the refs in a single location so they can be edited more easily. I can do the initial conversion to this method if you wish, or if you object, you can move the reference out of the Reflist template. I have made it multi-column, since there are quite a few citations already. There is a way to link the short citations to the references in the next section if you want to do that. You can see this in action at Bog turtle. Again, I can implement this if you wish. Donlammers (talk) 09:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Some comments
Talk:Torrent Bay

message: I have added a "classic shot" of Torrent Bay, not sure about licensing and fair use so I just added one of my own. It's not the best, one I would like to see on this page is . Would love to expand the article, just don't have a lot of time at the moment. Duphus 04:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This image is now available in Wikipedia at :Image:Torrent Bay from the Abel Tasman Coast Track.jpg. -- PatLeahy (talk) 07:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Riverside Discovery Center

message: I was just there this weekend and They don't have a swinhoe pheasants they have a Lady Amherst in the same enclosure as the Red Panda. Also a bobcat exhibit is under construction. If anyone can find verification of this would be helpful. Plus somehow mentioning the carp and geese and ducks you can feed at the beginning when you first walk in. --Xiahou 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First hand observations
Talk:Brad Zaun

message: Guys the proper name for the college he attended is Grand View University. If we could update this that would be great. 
The Wikipedia page for the university covers this change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:9404:CCF3:D1B1:B288:F8B2:A0F0 (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand View University  

message: Is there a serious challenger to Brad Zaun in the next election? How do we get rid of this guy?  Not only did he destroy the chance for felons who have paid their debt to society to be restored their right to vote, he is the primary obstacle in repealing prohibition of marijuana, something a majority of Iowans want. DavesPlanet (talk) 22:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next election
Talk:Deirdre Shannon

message: Her name does not appear as a former member on the official web site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.128.25 (talk) 02:29, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "erased" by Celtic Woman 
Talk:Seneca Park Zoo

message: The Seneca Park Zoo confirmed in 2020, they will make two large updates. The first being Tropics Complex, which the zoo will make some living tropical rainforest exhibits, bringing back their ring tailed lemurs, white handed gibbons and bornean orangutans, as well as housing lowland gorillas for the first time. They will also make an Aquarium featuring california sea lions, african penguins, polar bear, fish, coral and reef sharks, but it's unclear whether they will have dolphins, orcas, jellyfish, octopuses, sea turtles, manatees, macaws, sloths, anteaters, toucans, tapirs or pygmy hippopotamuses in the future with these large updates. IceKevtheElephant (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We will need citations of reliable sources stating this in order to do anything with this information. General Ization Talk   19:07, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2025 Seneca Park Zoo updates
Talk:Actress

message: Umm. . . why not have a separate article under "ACTRESS"?  It means a female actor; a woman who acts.  Hello!!  Isn't somebody being a little PC, having only "actor" for both sexes?
:As explained in the editing tutorial, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, and therefore if it cannot be expanded into an encyclopedic entry, it is better to place it in a sister project Wikipedia:Tutorial (Keep in mind) A simple definition of the word "actress" is therefore not found here for that reason.  There is nothing stopping you from writing an entry specifically about the actress in the history of the performing arts, however.
:Mike hayes 00:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not?
Talk:Utah's Hogle Zoo

message: We need a new picture; the current one is dark and it's hard to read. Anyone live near the Zoo wanna snap one really quick? Jhunt47 (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture 

message: In this edit and in several before, you've capitalized the word exhibits in a section heading without explaining why. I've changed to lower case, explained why and linked to the guideline several times now. Do you see Closed Exhibits as a proper noun? It looks to me like a list of exhibits which have been closed and I'm not seeing why it would be capitalized. Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨  22:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence case for section headings
Talk:Wonders of Wildlife Museum & Aquarium

message: I removed some unsourced controvery, opinion, and commentary from this article.  No doubt these controversies exist to some degree, thus finding supporting citations for them shouldn't be all that difficult.  Rklawton 17:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The family pricing information does include a family of two adults and any of their children or grandchildren. That is why I said a typical family. There are other admission tickets and various prices, however I thought a general interest of "how much?" should be included but the reader could investigate further if they wanted more. Durbinmj 02:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is the word "typical."  It's too ambiguous.  Rklawton 02:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: Rklawton, the photo you have labeled as "Shark Tank" is actually known as the "Out to Sea Gallery." Durbinmj 02:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  I've changed the caption both here and on the image page.  Rklawton 02:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture caption 

message: This article needs updated information.  For example, it indicates the location "is planned to reopen on September 21, 2017" - but this is now in the past; the renovations have now re-opened.  More details on exactly what is included (the new Wildlife Galleries vs. Aquarium Adventure, for example), and updated pictures, would also be helpful. 
BDLatimer (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates post-renovation 
Talk:Jer's Vision

message: It looks like user Persephone1021 was trying to update the article to reflect the current programming of the Charity but had his/her revisions reverted and reported for vandalism.  What is going on & who is this anonymous user with the snarky vendetta against a charity just based on its name? Arianna (talk) 03:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent issues 

message: Alright, I tried to basically fix everything that was wrong - got rid of the history section, actually used a tonne of refernces, I basically copied the format of EGALE Canada's wikipage, since it is a similar organization and doesn't seem to have had the problems this one has.  Please let me know what you think!
Arianna (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Overhaul
Talk:Chick Henderson (singer)

message: It is questionable to class him as a civilian war casualty, although he is stated to have joined the Merchant Navy.  He is commemorated by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission as a Service officer casualty, Sub Lieutenant (E), Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve, with war grave at Haslar Royal Naval Cemetery.  He is listed under his birth name as which he apparently served. Cloptonson (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Service Status
Talk:Glen Cove, New York

message: Does It Consist Of
Glen Cove
Glen Head
Glenwood Landing
Brookville
Old Brookville
Upper Brookville
Sea Cliff
Locust Valley
Lattingtown
& Matinecock? 2600:4041:55F8:A400:C01F:C076:9BAC:4C02 (talk) 02:18, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What communities does the greater Glen Cove really consist of
Talk:Monitor hypothesis

message: I created this page because there was no dedicated article for the (rather important and controversial) hypotheses of Stephen Krashen. The material was already on Wikipedia, but it was buried in a discussion of something completely different at the Critical Period Hypothesis page. I ripped it out, set up this page and added the 'further reading' and 'links' sections. Also, the introduction has been slightly modified. Jsteph 05:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of page

message: There are already separate articles for each of the 5 hypotheses. Additionally, this page is titled incorrectly- the monitor theory is not the name for all 5 of the theories, it is but a part of the larger picture. The monitor theory or hypothesis is only one of Krashen's 5 fundamental theories of second language acquisition. If this article were to be kept, I think it should be titled "Krashen's theories of language acquisition" or some such something. Lpjurca (talk) 04:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The umbrella term is 'monitor model', though Krashen rarely refers to them as anything other than "five hypotheses". The 'monitor hypothesis' is one of the five. But too late now... 13:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think that this should be completely redone 

message: I have made several changes to this article, including linking it to the more in-depth information provided by the other articles on Krashen's Theories. Additionally, I added sources and citations, along with more in-depth information about the Monitor Theory. I feel that these changes make this article more valuable to those seeking information about the Monitor Theory and Krashen's other theories. Lpjurca (talk) 21:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Kuzunoha

message: Kuzu means kudzu, not arrowroot. Japanese "kuzu" is often mistranslated as "arrowroot". --163.139.215.193 17:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a mistranslation, just a different translation.  The kanji in question (Nelson 5060, JIS 336-b) is a nonstandard variant of "KATSU/tsuzura/kuzu" (Nelson 5126, Morohashi 31420).  Its meanings are given as:  "tsuzura: arrowroot; a strong-fiber vine -- kuzu: arrowroot, kudzu; arrowroot starch."  Since "arrowroot" is the meaning chosen by Nozaki, it seems least confusing to retain that meaning. Shimeru 00:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kudzu, not arrowroot 
Talk:Lenny Hart

message: M. Hart's self-described half-brother writes in a 2006 blog entry at http://gratefulbutnotdeadblog.com/ of LH that 
: He died in 1974 at the young age of fifty-five from colon cancer...
From that you can infer (1918/19 -1974), which i've added. I would hope a better source than a nearly-anon blog could be turned up. --Jerzy•t 06:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital Stats
Talk:Rat-shot

message: Added more links, fixed the reference citation, and, in general, cleaned-up article.  Have also recommended it for a merger, as it is still somewhat short for a full-fledged article.  Yaf 05:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge. Arthurrh 22:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: I don't trust this source saying that rat-shot would have difficulty penetrating paper at a distance of 10 feet, and suspect it was an exaggeration or some artistic license made by the author of a book meant for a popular audience. I've never used rat-shot though, so if anybody has any experience or a source, could they confirm if this claim is true? If it isn't, I am going to remove the passage from the article. Buttonwillowite (talk) 11:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angels on call 

message: The into says **for use in rifled firearms as opposed to more traditional smoothbores such as shotguns.**
Uses says **Rat-shot cartridges are best used in dedicated smoothbore firearms**
I have no idea which should be correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.165.3 (talk) 06:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Emerald Express

message: For purposes of accuracy and neutrality, it seems this article would benefit from additional citations in several places, and form a base of references which does not rely quite so heavily on documents produced by the operating agency. Greenineugene (talk) 20:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/Early/cleanup/stubsensor/20060810

message: Hi, I have seen a few examples of a stub being removed, leaving the article without any category.  This undo's all the good work of those doing stub sorting -- please revise the text on this project page to clearly indicate that the stub tag contains categorisation which needs to be retained if the tag is going to be removed. John Vandenberg 05:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would this proposed addition to the directions be helpful?  I am thinking it would put the articles in to the uncategorized category without asking the unstubifier to categorize the article or to leave an incorrect stub tag Jeepday 15:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  careless removing of stubs resulting in categorisation being dropped
Talk:Theology of the Cross

message: "As one would find consistent with his Evangelical breakthrough" 
Is this applying contemporary labels onto Luther when such a phrase and/or construct likely didn't even exist in his day? As in, Lutheran theology actually came from a pre-existing Evangelical theology?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.190.4 (talk) 12:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evangelical reference? 

message: I don't have my bibliographic citations in front of me.  I will be back later this evening to fill those out.  Pastordavid 06:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: It would seem that the definition of the eucharist as a sacrifice of Christ would imply semantic links with the theology of the cross. There is information on this in the article eucharistic theology. 69.157.229.14 (talk) 02:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eucharistic theology

message: How come theology of the cross is about Martin Luther and Lutheranism and does not represent Catholic theology ? Is it not a main aspect of Catholicism? Alan347 (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Theology of the Cross is not Theology ABOUT the Cross... it is a way of doing theology that is antithetical to Catholic theology (Theology of Glory) and was one of the main disagreements between Luther and Rome. See http://www.christianpost.com/news/theology-of-glory-vs-theology-of-the-cross-78119/ for a more detailed treatment. ReformedArsenal (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Theology of the cross is a main understanding of Pauline Literature and the Gospel itself in the Catholic Tradition. Perhaps this will be of interest to you http://cumecclesia.blogspot.com/2007/08/case-of-mistaken-identity.html. Alan347 (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Catholic adoption of theologica crucis is a recent development. If you want, you could add a section about Catholic appropriation of the topic that would be up to you. ReformedArsenal (talk) 20:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm a fifth year B.A. Theology student (Catholic Tradition) and so far all we've been hearing in the lectures is that Paul's letters and the gospel focuses on theologia crucis Alan347 (talk) 09:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic
Talk:Colstrip, Montana

message: Nyttend - So where is there anything on Wiki that says you cannot link to YouTube, when video can clearly contain material relevant to understanding the topic, and yet still be too large to paraphrase in the wiki article?  
I note from the pattern of your vast listing of contributions that you spend about half a minute on each page, and edit a wide variety of kinds of wiki pages.  For Colstrip, it is most likely you have never actually looked at the YouTube video to really judge as an editor if it is relevant to the topic...  You have a responsibility to not discourage contributions of real knowledge to a particular topic.  The video should remain - it is about Colstrip's History as told by a Poet Laureate P.primo (talk) 06:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justified Use of Youtube video about history of Colstrip as told by notable person from Colstrip

message: Please be aware: YouTube isn't a reliable source, and your usage here fails the external links standards: external links shouldn't be in the middle of the text, and having that link in the Colstrip article really isn't necessary for the article.  I can't see the video (I'm on a borrowed computer, as my computer's wireless isn't working at the moment), and I can't see the video: where's the video from?  Is it a video taken by the uploader?  Or is it perhaps a video taken from a TV broadcast?  Nyttend backup (talk) 15:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: YouTube copied from Talk page for context
Talk:Lockout–tagout

message: Today I edited the page to include an external link, without realizing I had tried to do that before and it was removed. I am not sure why. Can someone help?
Thanks TMorata (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on November 30 2018 re External links 

message: Most large circuit breakers of 50 amp capacity and greater tend to have locking holes not just for the OFF position but also for the ON position.
Are there any situations where lockout is used in reverse as a lock-in for essential equipment that absolutely should not be disconnected or shut down without the approval of multiple different authorities? A hospital life-support power circuit would be a possible example.
Usually the large current interrupting devices are designed so that they can trip in the event of an overload and correctly turn themselves off even if locked into the operating position. DMahalko (talk) 02:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock-in/Tag-in?  

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Energy-isolation device. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Energy-isolation device" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Annual Global Orgasm for Peace

message: Amended the line about the Global Consciousness Movement having 'evidence' that proves anything other than that they've smoked way too many drugs to be allowed near science. The article itself seems borderline, really.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.18.204 (talk) 09:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose to add well-established evidence from neuroscience that orgasm releases the hormone oxytocin, which has been called the "love and trust" hormone by scientists.  Many references from academic primary and secondary sources are evidence with scientific evaluation of the increase in trust produced by oxytocin - in fact there is such a strong positive "feel good" effect that oxytocin clouds objective judgement.   Mediation4u (talk) 07:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  No opposition, so paragraph added.  with notable references.  Mediation4u (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonfactual content 

message: http://www.globalorgasm.org forwards to https://boldpleasures.com/globalorgasmday, a website selling sex toys. Darsie42 (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Official website"
Talk:Martin van Bruinessen

message: Is very low standard with being a publications list like that - it needs a cleanup SatuSuro 05:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Yang Dezhi

message: While I do not dispute that Yang served as Xu’s No. 2 in the initial part of the 1979 invasion of Vietnam, I seriously doubt we know enough about the inner workings of the CCP MAC to actually specify that Yang was “nominated,” for the role, and personally have not seen any evidence that Xu made any request along those lines. I have left it alone, to give the editor time to provide a citation. DOR (HK) (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That was an original research. I rewrote this part with a reliable source.Lvhis (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination