lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miracle on 34th Street

message: In the 1947 movie. Kringle says that Tompkins was John Q. Adams' vice president. It was a mistake by the movie writers, who assumed that Adams & Tompkins served together, because Adams was the 6th President & Tompkins the 6th Vice President. GoodDay (talk) 04:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniel D. Tompkins  

message: This mention in the summary does not include when District Attorney Thomas Mara said that.  It appears in a scene usually cut from broadcasts to allow more time for commercials.  It was shot in the Central Park zoo.  Mara's son, Tommy, can't get the reindeers' attention, but Kris walks by, snaps his finger and they come running (thanks to an unseen zoo employee's broom handle).  Tommy exclaims getting the reindeer to come to him proves Kris is Santa, to which his father rather tiredly agrees.  I played Tommy is how I know this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:6A00:32DA:F856:CF5E:FBDE:81E0 (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: D.A. Said He's Santa

message: Much of the dialogue between the little girl in Kris Kringle's lap and Kris Kringle was in German, while little of it was in Dutch.98.149.97.245 (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign Language 

message: What were stated inspirations for the film? Did "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus come into play? Misty MH (talk) 05:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for the film
Talk:Bohemia Interactive

message: I've made numerous changes to the entire article regarding grammar and fluency, but for content I am not well-versed enough to address the topics discussed on this forum. I would be happy to return to it once the content has been sorted.Spatium apis (talk) 01:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: - Are you referring to the discussion above? Those were sorted out when I have started rewriting the article. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

text: - I was! I missed the date underneath, and wasn't sure if they had been addressed since the comments were written, my apologies! If the facts are correct then I believe that everything else is in order! Spatium apis (talk) 02:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CopyEditing 

message: Source Inadvertent Consequences (talk) 12:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: British Aerospace Purchases BIS
Talk:Starvation (computer science)

message: Errr.. I don't get the blaming of the scheduler. Am I wrong in thinking the fault lies with the programmer whose protocol didn't account for the possibility? For example, a spinlock solution to the dining philosophers problem avoids deadlock but still has starvation - Isn't it the fault of a bad solution solution that this is possible? It seems weird trying to blame the scheduler for a lack of precognition and/or intimate knowledge of the problem that you are actually trying to solve with your code. I understand bad scheduling can cause this, but it seems somehow secondary to me right now. Delete this if I'm just not caffeinated enough:)
Also, the distinction between deadlock and starvation, though technically correct, could be clearer. I'll bet a mathematician wrote that:P
:Most of the time, starvation occurs as a result of two unrelated processes; the OS scheduler reliable pre-empts one of those processes in favor of the other. You can't blame the application programmer in this case, because (a) he didn't cause it, and (b) his code isn't at fault. Raul654 13:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence about Windows is misleading. It gives the impression that the Windows scheduler is inferior compared to other operating systems, while the real differentiation is between general-purpose systems (including Windows) and realtime systems. - Sikon 10:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seriously - many real time systems schedule the highest priority runnable thread only! That's far worse than Windows, or Linux. Windows schedules the highest priority runnable thread, but occasionally (in a random way) boosts the priority of other threads so that they will not starve completely(!). This effect can be observed when a "Realtime" process hangs (for instance Winamp, when set to use realtime-priority). The system is still usable, but mouseclicks are dispatched and windows are updated perhaps once every 10 seconds. The scheduler in Linux is much better for an interactive system, since it will effectively run threads that use little CPU (like a windowing interface) before a high-cpu task (like a hanged mp3-player). Hmm... I realize I'm rambling... --Avl 09:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from the Aughties 

message: Starvation is an issue whenever there are concurrent jobs; it only was most thoroughly studied in computer science. There already exists a redirect , and we have the link  in Shortest job next, which is an application not limited to computers. We could express this by leaving out "In computer science" from the lede and possibly additionally by renaming the article to "resource starvation". But there is no imminent need for such changes, as any reader coming here from one of the redirects will probably have no problem transferring the concept to their field of interest. Conceivably, there could be two different articles, although I see even less need for that. Still, the redirects are useful per WP:R#KEEP7. — Sebastian 10:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just computer science
Talk:United Africa Company of Nigeria

message: * Looks like someone just dumped text from their website here. I'll try to come back and rewrite the page this weekend. Rjhatl 02:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new Group MD/CEO has been appointed for UACN Plc. His name is Mr. Larry E. Ettah. Please change accordingly.
TA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oyeakd (talk • contribs) 09:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New MD/CEO of UACN Plc - Larry Ettah
Talk:Hambledon Club

message: I removed the piped link from "madge" to cunt. There is no mention in the target article that explains to a casual reader why the link sends them there. There is nothing in this article that explains the link. I realize that there was an invisible "edit mode" note that referred people to the talk page of the Hambledon, Hampshire, but how many casual readers would hit the edit link and see the note? If "madge" must be explained (and I can see why an explanation might be necessary), it should either be in the main article, or at the Madge disambig page if "madge" is wikilinked again.  Joyous | Talk 02:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is much better after BlackJack's latest edit, thank you Jack. But I still wonder if there's a reference we can cite to justify the claim. I was hoping that we could just cite the OED, but I checked and was surprised to find that this meaning of "madge" doesn't occur in there — apparently a madge is either a magpie, or a barn owl, or a kind of lead hammer wrapped in cloth. Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If it doesn't appear in the OED that's reason to suspect that the meaning may well be false. This statement therefore needs robust sourcing. 86.136.94.95 16:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I've labelled it "citation needed". Stephen Turner (Talk) 17:14, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have noted earlier than this that the needed citation has been supplied. JH (talk page) 20:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Wikipedians who use Mozilla Firefox

message: Why no logo for the babel box?  Cafe Nervosa 02:48, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it is discussed here [] Cafe Nervosa 02:58, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Should we use fx instead of fox? --Hello World! 09:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It works now.  See the instructions in Usage, above. —QuicksilverT @ 20:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Babel box logo? 

message: Wouldn't it be better to rename this category to Mozilla Firefox users for consistency with the other categories? --IByte 20:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change proposal 

message: Ok, what's all this about using Fire fox? Does it help WP or anything? § 70.165.71.229 21:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's about supporting opensource or something - which is the same idea as wikipedia, basically. And maybe there's some conflicts with IE ? I don't see the point why using specifically FF would help wikipedia though. Guess "I use Firefox" would be perfectly enough of a statement. I also use OpenOffice, but it doesn't make me feel like making earth a better planet... --Lhead 11:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Ya, it's so unfair. I can't list the users who play a certain multiplayer game because it is "irrelevant" (but I think the wikipedians are actually saying that they're censoring me) while using a program to edit wikipdia is relevant. I think their's some WikiNationalists that are showing too much pride in people who edit their articles/ --µWiki   Peers / Seeds (YouWiki) 21:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's so great about using Firefox? 

message: This category is irrelevant to the encyclopedic content and there are statistics of the number of users using a certain browser. There's no point of listing erroneous categories such as this that has nothing to do with the user himself contributing to wikipedia. The user edits wikipedia is a better statement than Wikipedians who use Mozzila Firefox (to edit). If browsers are listed just because it's used to edit wiki, then that's showing signs of WikiNationalism (ehem in which ehem is a ehem democracy ehem). idk if you're gonna rant and deny my statement I will not care.  --µWiki   Peers / Seeds (YouWiki) 21:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bring that up to the parent category: Category:Wikipedians by web browser. --haha169 (talk) 23:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing for deletion? 

message: I recently added myself to this category, as can be seen on my uesrpage, but it does not appear here. Does any one know why? I am aslo catgegorised as a Wikepedian who uses Google Chrome and that does appear in the appropriate category, but not quite in alphabetical order. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Query about why this is not consistent with my userpage
Talk:Co-curricular activity (Singapore)

message: This is what you give animals in the deprived atmosphere of a zoo. This describes Singapore pretty well. People are almost completely domesticated. They believe everything and question nothing. They seem like mindless robots going about their business, even their recreation is curated by the authorities. It's just sad. They can write articles like this and not realize the import of what they are saying. They think it is normal.--ෆාට් බුබුල (talk) 20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Enrichment activities"

message: Cakeman, seeing that you come from the same school as me (ahem), would you like to verify if it is true that all schools in Singapore have both Core & Merit CCAs, or term them as such?--Ariedartin 15:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we include the fact that the government renamed it to core CCAs instead of ECAs to force students to go for their trainings because the students and parents alike thought they were "extra" and skipped them? The merit CCA now takes the place of ECAs. --Terrancommander 15:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core & Merit CCAs? 

message: Please post your queries - should they be concerned with one or two details of the article, and not one large chunk of it (open out new sections for those, please) - here.
With that having been said, let me address my point of contention: Shouldn't the Harmonica and Keyboard Ensemble (currently under Clubs and Societies) be under Performing Arts instead? --Starry maiden Gazer 07:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor discrepancies 
Talk:Man Parrish

message: Although subjected to a few minor edits since appearing on Wikipedia, the biography content that I removed today was most likely lifted from Man Parrish's web site, which took it from All Music Guide, a commercial web site whose parent company derives most of its income from licensing such material. Parrish may or may not have permission to republish that bio on his own web site, but Wikipedia surely doesn't. —mjb 01:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: I understand that the copyrighted material had to be removed, however; I will set out to do an appropriate biography for Mr. Parrish and will post it if one isn’t put up within the next few days, this gentleman is one of the forefathers of electronic music and it is a travesty that there is a short blurb like this in regard to him. —User:DJ Black Adam
:Go for it! Just be sure to adhere to WP:BLP, avoid hyperbole, etc. —mjb 03:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: sorely and woefully remiss

message: This section is *waay* too long, and adds nothing (IMO) to the article.  Do we really need to know that Parrish's number "Hip Hop Be Bop" was on NINE compilation albums?  When the song is already listed twice elsewhere in the article? Any objections to me removing the section? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 02:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances / Compilations 

message: The claim that Man Parrish will be releasing tracks on Southern Fried Records needs a source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.217.240 (talk) 04:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern Fried Records

message: The article about [Man Parrish] says "His premier release was Hip Hop, Be Bop (Don’t Stop), released in 1983 and is considered a classic in the genre of Electronic Music." while the one about the song ["Hip Hob Be Bop"] says "It was released in 1982 and is considered a classic in the genre of electronic music.", which year is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.41.37 (talk) 01:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A (small?) detail that should be corrected? 

message: There was a link from the infobox to an image at ":File:Manuel.jpg" until I removed it a moment ago. There's currently an image of that name illustrating an article about a Scottish railway junction, Manuel Junction. I thought that your image had been over-written, so asked an admin to look into it - but apparently the Man Parrish image was deleted in Sept 2009 because it lacked copyright info. See User_talk:BrownHairedGirl#Admin_help_needed_re_over-written_image.2C_I_think. PamD (talk) 18:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy

message: Finally bit the bullet and brought the whole article more into conformity with a proper encylopedic tone, got rid of inflammatory language, rewrote rhetorical devices (especially the leading questions), and greatly expanded the references.  I believe the article is stronger for it and is more reflective of what Wikipedia strives to be.
Rtarzwell (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Revision

message: I appreciate the author's enthusiasm to learn Davanloo's Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherepy (DISTDP) and share his interest with others by publishing this article.  He, however displays a limited knowledge of many aspects of DISTDP.  To detail these would require a line by line commentary and is more than I am prepared to do.
A better option would be to point interested parties to Dr. Davanloo's own recent summary of his technique:
Davanloo, H: "Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy", in: Kaplan H., and Sadock B. (eds), Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 8th ed, Vol 2, Chapter 30.9, 2628-2652, Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2005
Jim Schubmehl, MD
Clinical Associate Professor
Department of Psychiatry
University of Rochester
and
President
Rochester Institute for Davanloo's
Intensive Short-Term dynamic Psychotherapy
Hi Jim.  I added the K&S Comprehensive reference to the first paragraph of the article.  Thanks for supplying it.  
Please feel free to dive in and supplement my article at those points where you feel it could benefit from buttressing.  When I submitted this article, I wanted to strike a balance between scholarly precision and accessibility to a non-technical audience.  I've tried to keep definitions clear and simple, though I recognize this can lead to a loss of precision.  So, yes, my goal was to display limited knowledge.  I had hoped others might follow along and contribute amplifying articles which unpack some of the nuances of the technique.  An introductory primer didn't seem the place to do that.
--Robert Tarzwell  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.46.15.8 (talk) 22:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited 

message: Article contains questions, these should be removed. - RoyBoy 800 05:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: It looks like the only sources that talk about Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy are by the author of the theory. That suggests it is not widely known, or suitable for Wikipedia. The article needs independent sources that discuss the subject. Sionk (talk) 11:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: We cannot say Davanloo developed it without a source other than himself.  DGG ( talk ) 02:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "developed by"

message: There has recently been made criticisms in several media outlets that probably should be discussed as well. In order to maintain a non-biased or at least nuanced article. 84.202.12.137 (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms?
Talk:The Cheetah Girls (film)

message: Since the sitcom spin-off for the Cheetah Girls never materialized, I feel the article should be deleted. This also goes for Haversham Hall unless it is released as a DCOM, allowed to air elsewhere, or is sent to DVD.
WAVY 10 22:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sitcom? 

message: Seeing as the trivia section is only 2 items long, don't you think that the info can be worked into other parts of the article? Cuz right now it's pretty useless if you ask me. --I'm Kinda Awesome... 20:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: *We need a poster for this page.72.94.46.148 23:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie Poster

message: I came here to find out what this film is about, and there is nothing about the plot! Someone please add one! Celebrity-Benji 18:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Plot...? In a Disney film? You must be joking. 93.219.138.165 (talk) 14:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?? 

message: I wanted to find out about what happened between raven and the cheetah girls and nothing in here tells why they broke up!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.216.163.103 (talk) 00:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fued?!? 

message: Hey 
In the part where Derek starts the guitar part in the song "Sisters" the character is playing the electric guitar, there aren't any wires attached, so there can't have been an amp. 
Happykid536 (talk) 04:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes 

message: It's fairly obvious that the Cheetah Girls are a ripoff of The Cheetahmen.  I mean....my God, you have to be insanely blind to not notice it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.192.239 (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearly a ripoff. 

message: ""I have a heart of gold to those who deserve to be treasured,but i have a heart stone to those who deserve to be destroyed.""
§§§§§§§  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.218.193 (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  relly sad
Talk:Type 59 tank

message: The Internet certainly thinks that this tank in the collection of the bovington tank museum is a type-59 (I would assume sourced via Iraq via first gulf war) User:颐园新居 thinks it isn't. Any third opinions?©Geni (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Reddit thinks they were part of the upgrade attempt.©Geni (talk) 05:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a type 59 tank?

message: I've found out that during the 1980s, during a period of détente between China and the US, the Chinese and the Americans cooperated on the Jaguar Prototype tank, which was intended to be a modernization of the Type 59 and was successfully completed, though no orders were ever placed. Should it get mentioned on this page as a variant or should it get its own page?
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/jaguar.htmSdio7 (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaguar Prototype 
Talk:Leap, County Cork

message: : LEAP is an acronym for Long term Equity AnticiPation, which is a type of option that has a term to expiry greater than that associated with a regular option, typically between one and two years.
This info is off-topic for this article.  If it can be an article of it's own, we can make a disambiguation page.  Tedernst 03:30, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Puyo Pop Fever

message: Shouldn't there be a summary on Popoi?Ranma9617 03:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: summary

message: While playing in the Classic Mode multiplayer, I occasionally got a simple 2-chain or 3-chain (I think somethimes a 1-chain even) and the game gave my opponent a whole lot of nusiance puyos, way more than usual. It's happened the other way around, too (me and my opponent have both gotten creamed for no reason.) --Libertyernie2 23:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is probably due to some sort of signal quality issue (Wireless, most likely DS version) or a packet (On a PC with poor internet) related problem. It should have some method to check that the packets are correct (checksums), but this may vary between platforms. In other words, it's probably simply something that was overlooked, or a trade off for speed, rather than an actual bug... Don't quote me on it though, I don't do much network programming anymore. Anyways, If you're suggesting something is added to the article, try to find a (reliable) source. Original Research does not work for Wikipedia. 24.192.199.46 (talk) 18:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiplayer goofiness? 

message: A link to the download site for the 15th Anniversary Edition would be useful. I have been unable to locate a site that offers the game for free. Is the game still being offered for free? All of the sites that offer the game charge you to download it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Causality-GT (talk • contribs) 21:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that it is available at all times. I know this is really old but I thought I'd leave the note for anyone wondering. 24.192.199.46 (talk) 18:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 15th is not available for free, though there is a fan translation, but I can't link to that here. The game that is available for free is Puyo Puyo Fever. ~ Keiji (iNVERTED) (Talk) 17:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  15th Anniversary Edition 

message: Shouldn't there be more emphasis on the characters and story ? I noticed a while back there was better descriptions on the characters than now. Missingno255 (talk) 07:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Emphasis 

message: Popoi isnt a he. Popoi is a she, as she talks completely like a girl, and thus "meows". --Minosuki (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Popoi is a he. This has been stated officially IIRC. ~ Keiji (iNVERTED) (Talk) 17:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popoi 

message: Fever Touch is just a smartphone port of Fever, with a slightly different name. 野狼院ひさし Hisashi Yarouin 04:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge: [[Puyo Puyo Fever Touch]] → [[Puyo Puyo Fever]]