Talk:The Driller Killer

message: I replaced the original content of this article with the content from the duplicate but incorrectly titled "Driller Killer" article. I did not see any content worth saving from original content under this title as the moved content allready covered the worthwhile info. --Cab88 11:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

message: This is clearly a messed up article. Unfortunately I am not familiar enough with the movie to fix it, but someone has combined a video game plot with the movie info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Defacement

message: I seem to remember the film being broadcast (possibly with cuts) on Channel 4 (UK) sometime c. 1997 ? Can anyone confirm ? 86.112.51.161 (talk) 20:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadcast

message: If the film is in the public domain, how can there be two people who own the rights?--77.96.116.198 (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this - and how did it even become public domain? 阝工巳几千凹父工氐 (talk) 07:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anyone have any details as to how this happened? Ttenchantr (talk) 05:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this question has remained unanswered for over eight months and no reliable source can be found to confirm that the film is in the public domain. I have removed all references and related links to the public domain question from the page. Kire1975 (talk) 01:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia relies on reliable sources, which state that this film is in the public domain. It is currently sourced to a Wired article  and an alternative source is in a Vice article . Please do not remove sourced content. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  The reliable sources page you linked to states that WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. When carefully weighted, it is evident that the Wired listicle that is in dispute here uses an unreliable torrent page as a source. Nothing becomes not in the public domain by being labeled so. Conclusion: the source is unreliable. It must be removed. Kire1975 (talk) 18:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wired is a reliable source with an editorial process that reviews content. Your claims about their sourcing are speculation, and your conclusion is inaccurate. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rights 

message: Can anyone check to see if these two sources are reliable?
Source 1
Source 2
Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: TypePad is a blogging site similar to WordPress.com or Blogspot.  Anything there is self-published and likely not reliable.  Horror Society is a small, horror-themed website.  I sometimes cite them for reviews, but I don't like to cite them for factual statements.  If they say a director says something on a DVD commentary, that's alright, but I don't think they do much fact-checking beyond looking stuff up on the IMDb.  The other problem is that the TypePad blog says that it's just an offhand joke made by the director. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is this source reliable?  I ask because it says "According to Ferrara, the bum at the start of the film is Bruce Willis in his first film role (you can’t see his face, but Willis says it was absolutely not him)."  Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hard to say – maybe so.  It's mentioned in other reliable sources, such as this article in The Austin Chronicle, but mostly in terms of its influence as a cable TV show in the 1980s.  It seems like it might be alright, though.  Given that the sources express some caution about whether Willis actually appears in the film, I think we'd have to be careful about what we said. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   I agree.  Who knows?  Maybe Willis will deny appearing in this film.  After all, Tim Robbins denied appearing in Network and Denzel Washington denied appearing in Death Wish.  In the meantime, I'm not going to post further information on Willis' alleged involvement with this film. Thank you, NinjaRobotPirate.  Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources about [[Bruce Willis]] being in the film 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion