lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kathleen Ann Goonan

message: I added the cleanup-rewrite tag for the impartial language used in the article.  Further, the article should be expanded as the subject seems to be of some importance. J Martin 20:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Goonan is not a British SF author. She's American. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.138.45.98 (talk) 00:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been corrected shortly afterwards in this edit. --Oefe (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category Error 

message: Wikipedia is not a venue for literary criticism. This biography should limit itself to biographical details and a very short, neutral description of her genre. Text like:
* Her work rewards the careful reader with passages of great descriptive power and beauty.
is entirely inappropriate. All unsourced material will be removed shortly. -Will Beback · † · 21:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been removed in this edit. So I think we can consider this as resolved. --Oefe (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Literary criticism

message: I think she and her husband sold the Lakeland house a couple of years ago and that they now split their time seasonally between Taverner, FL and Pigeon Forge, TN. --69.124.56.44 11:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Residence 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* Tables may be used to organise short stories, poems and/or book reviews. 
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Empire style

message: France:
*Dominique Vivant Denon, director of Fine Arts under Napoleon
*Jacob-Desmalter, cabinet-maker
*Percier and Fontaine, architects
*Gilles-Paul Cauvet, architect
*François-Joseph Bélanger, architect of the Château de Bagatelle
*Louis-Martin Berthault, architect
*Alexandre-Théodore Brogniart, architect
*Bernard Poyet, architect
*Pierre-Philippe Thomire, bronzier
*Bernard Molitor, cabinet-maker
*Guillaume Beneman, cabinet-maker
*Château de Malmaison
*Hubert Robert, inventor of Marie-Antoinette's 'Etruscan' furniture at the Château de Rambouillet
*Pierre de la Mésagère's Journal des Dames et des Modes
Great Britain:
*Henry Holland
**Carlton House
**Stourhead
*John Nash
**Regent's Park
*Henry Hope
*George Smith, Collection of Designs for Household Furniture (1808)
*Regency furniture
Italy:
*Pietro Ruga
*Felice Giani
*Giuseppe Borsato
*Giuseppe Valadier
Once names listed as "See also" have been worked into the context of the article, their names could be struck from the list. --Wetman 20:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir John Morris, 1st Baronet

message: *He was the owner of two mines Ynys and Rhydydefaid in Clyne Valley, Swansea.  
*Morris was one of the businessmen involved in the development of the Swansea and Mumbles Railway.
*In 1768, Morris decided to build a planned village for the workers of his copper factories, this village developed into the town of Morriston.
*He was also responsible for the financing of the building of Morris Castle.
*In 1775, Morris built Clasemont to be his home near Morriston.
*John Morris was made a baronet in April 1806
*Sir John Morris had as son who was also called John Morris (who became 2nd Baronet of Clasemont).
*Sir John Morris died on February 24, 1855
(Sloman 20:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline and notes
Talk:Kombatan

message: The dispute over the name 'Modern Arnis' is widely known. I think the fact that it happened should be discussed somewhere in the article, though I grant that it need not appear in the first paragraph. JJL 20:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Arnis Name 

message: I have removed the tag disputing the article's notability. Kombatan is one of the more recognized groups/systems in Filipino Martial Arts/Arnis/Kali/Eskrima.
-Object404 (talk) 10:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Tag
Talk:Body Snatchers (1993 film)

message: This article is not a stub. Nareek 18:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The plot summary is pretty short, and also the majority of the movie takes place off the military base. *Moan* Moaners... *Moan* 07:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: The following info is unreferenced, so I moved it from the article to the discussion section:
"Nevertheless, the film enjoyed good VHS sales and high viewing figures on television showings." Robert Kerber (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced info
Talk:Betty Shine

message: Categories have been changed in accordance with the recent Arbitration on the paranormal, specifically 6a) Adequate framing, and Cultural artefacts. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 21:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category change

message: The text that says that'none of icke's prophecies came true' is both spurious and incorrect. At the time of this writing Icke has had many of his predictions realised and the link to the Guardian article is inappropriate. That link is actually a tongue-in-cheek list of journalistic retoric which is not aiming to be taken seriously and is cetainly not academic or journalistic reference material. This should be either removed or at least re-phrased. 194.176.105.142 (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurious and incorrect claims
Talk:Aestheticization of politics

message: Could the author of this article please attempt to rewrite this article so that it makes sense to someone other than the author of this article?  I have a vague sense of what it is attempting to say, but only afte reading it three times.  Also, a cited source is a must.--Hraefen 20:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This is not just poorly written but descends in incomprehensible gibberish in places. I will attempt to edit a little but if someone with keener insight as to what is intended here, perhaps he might take a shot. Sych (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibberish, in places
Talk:Confederate Monument in Louisville

message: I have a few more pics to use, which I'll put up later.  Also, I think on List of Registered Historic Places in Kentucky (Jackson County to Lyon County) we need to make Jefferson County its own separate article.  (No one saw me mention it, so I thought it best to mention it here.)--Bedford 22:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably makes sense due to the large amount of such places in Jefferson County. Have at it. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics and list of Registered Historic Places

message: There are illustrations of the two soldiers at the bottom, but all we get is a tiny distant view of the soldier at the top, and from the back at that. Who's on top and what does he look like? Also the illustrations of the bottom soldiers say "note the aging." What is "aging" of a bronze statue?  Dirt? Dents? Corrosion? Or just patina?  Absent a reliable, non- original research opinion, I will remove the comments about "aging."Edison (talk) 01:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The figure on top is a generic infantry soldier. Few days ago the AP printed a retraction after an article went out stating the figure was Jefferson Davis. Kintpuash (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Figure on top believed to be a modeled after Judge Reginald Thompson, placed text in article with cite. Kintpuash (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's on top? "And what is "aging?"

message: In 1895, the Confederate Veteran mentioned David Yandell, Enid's apparent uncle, was a member of the monument executive committee. Dr. Yandell founded the Louisville Medical Institute. [] This is too much first person research to put into the article. But it is possible the sexism charge is a 20th century extrapolation. Kintpuash (talk) 20:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Yandell controversy

message: The 1956 KHS research article is clear that von Miller, the Younger was the artist rather than his father. The template on the photos at the bottom of the page still show the father. Hoping someone can fix this efficiently. My template skills are lacking. Kintpuash (talk) 18:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: von Miller
Talk:Fontaine Ferry Park

message: The following sentence is questionable: "Fontaine Ferry is often cited bitterly as a reminder of racial segregation in Louisville. Prior to its integration in 1964, African Americans could only attend the much less elaborate Chickasaw Park.[2]"
The statement probably means to refer to Shawnee Park (a nearby segregated public park) rather than Fontaine Ferry Park (a private amusement park) and should be in that article rather than this one. There was no  amusement park comparable to Fountaine Ferry for Blacks. There was, however, a public park comparable to Shawnee Park for Blacks: Chickasaw Park. Frappyjohn (talk) 08:31, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I grew up in Bardstown and in the mid sixties would take the bus with friends to Louisville to go to the park. I remember there was a wooden motodrome (Wall of Death) that motorcyclists would ride in - I remember them coming to the top of the deep cylinder, nearly coming out. Do any other contributors remember that at the park. It would be helpful to have more detail about some of the attractions there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmchaffie (talk • contribs) 03:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall of Death motodrome in Fontaine Ferry
Wikipedia talk:Peer review/Automated

message: Why does it seem that the requests on the project page are really old? They all date between February and August of 2007. Shouldn't they be archived by now? Anyone who wants an automated peer review is probably turned off as it seems it's not active. --ṃ•α•Ł•ṭ•ʰ•Ə•Щ•  @ 23:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old requests on project page?
Talk:Heaven worship

message: This article is about the religion, Shangdi is about the being. Although, this article could be fleshed out a lot more. Миборовский 04:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose merge 

message: The wikipedia page for Shangdi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shangdi) states:
"According to Yanxia Zhao, evidence shows that Shangdi was probably more transcendental than immanent, only working through lesser gods.[2]"
"2 Zhao, Yanxia. Chinese Religion: A Contextual Approach. 2010. p. 154"
If there were lesser gods, then Shangdi was not a monotheistic being.
107.7.27.126 (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shangdi was not a monotheistic being 

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=tAE2OJ9bPG0C&pg=PA176#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=-E5LZeR7QKwC&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=a8NlooeZGC8C&pg=PA845#v=onepage&q&f=false
Page 83
http://books.google.com/books?id=1vEeAQAAMAAJ&q=Heaven+Guidang#search_anchor
http://books.google.com/books?id=JqUuEphJneAC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=RtwAMoUzDJcC&pg=PA8&#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Sc-shy_ZOMkC&pg=PA6#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=1Gt4hU9R8sAC&pg=PA77#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=HRQZhAFacQoC&pg=PA91#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Pj_e2d3eHTQC&pg=PA843#v=onepage&q&f=false
Vietnamese worship of shangdi and heaven
http://books.google.com/books?id=CAlh7JJYCvAC&pg=PA134#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 22:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources on heaven worship
Talk:Rape crisis centers in the United States

message: hmmm, at best this is a title problem
It looks like CSD ... but I will wait for more feedback before I tag it as such ...
Brian 20:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The content is fantastic, but could benefit from splitting US and global info. For example the S.A.F.E. is a US specific occupation. Any suggestions on existing pages this could be moved to, before creating a new one titled something like Rape_Crisis_Centers_(US) and link that to this page of course.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shushugah (talk • contribs) 20:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Funding and History to US specific Rape Crisis Center section 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sexual Assault Resource Service. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Widefox; talk 11:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sexual Assault Resource Service" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Per the suggestion by  above re splitting, I suggest moving this whole article to the title "Rape crisis centers in the United States", and then re-creating "Rape crisis centre" as a new article, even if its small to begin with. The new article may be able to use some of the content of this one, although probably little because it is so specific to one country. (In this way, the inward links to the redirect created from the move can then be checked, and those referring solely to the United States can stay as is, and any which are intended for the general topic, to be changed to the new article, at least initially). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split suggestion 

message: I have created the new article :Rape crisis centre and gone through all the links and redirects to the old article and sorted them all out in each article where appropriate. Rape crisis center now redirects to Rape crisis centre. The new article could do with more fleshing out, but it's a start. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:07, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup after move
Talk:OnStar Privacy

message: I disagree with the proposal of this article being proposed for deletion. The website is notable on the issue. In fact, its one of the only sites I could locate that is dedicated to the privacy concerns of OnStar
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/onstar5.htm
About.com cited it as a resource for its article, if its deemed worthy of being used in as a source for an article by a publication of that size, I would say its notable enough. Just because other sites haven’t put articles up citing it doesn’t make the information any more or less valuable to Wikipedia users.
I created the sub for it rather than taking up more space in the main OnStar article. A smaller mention of it is part of the main article, and its quite relevant there. Its easy to say that articles should be deleted but you need to look at the whole picture, including other articles dependant upon the proposed article to be deleted. In this case, the other artical relies on this one. While this one may not be significant when viewed all by itself, I do think it adds to the value of the main one. --Shortfuse 20:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Proposed Deletion Tag
Talk:T. D. Judah

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 00:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review
Talk:L'Échappée belle

message: AllMusic.com had nothing useful about this album; the page (here) was essentially a placeholder. -- Anna Kucsma 20:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was able to get the track titles from here — and lyrics, too, if I thought that this was the place for them. Haven't found out much else yet.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 20:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Listing

message: There doesn't seem to be anything else on Wikipedia named "L'Échappée belle". --Russ Blau (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll change it. I just thought I was doing due dilligence by putting "(album)" in the title.  — Anna Kucsma 19:51, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article need (album) in the title?
Talk:Transformers: Generation 2

message: This article should be merged with Transformers:Generation 2- Bushido Brown 00:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as this page is about Generation 2 in general, and the Transformers:Generation 2 page is about the comic.  Needs a lot of bulking out though.  Curis 21:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So like what the [redacted] are these people thinking in trying to delete or merge such an important article.  Don't they know that all transformers articles deserve to be on Wikipeda and why the [redacted] should they not [redacted] be?  [Redacted] it, [redacted] this [redacted].  Carolyn Baker III (talk) 00:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge of Rage (Transformers). 
Talk:A. Grant Evans

message: Previously, this article had credited Victor Parrington as the person responsible for suggesting the use of Collegiate Gothic architecture on the O.U. campus. Nothing in the Wikipedia article about Parrington suggests that he had anything to do with architecture. Luthera Mills, author cited in this article, indicates that it was Evans himself who initiated the choice, citing the then dean of administration, Dr. Roy Gittinger, as her source of information. Therefore, I have deleted the Parrington link. Bruin2 (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed link to Victor Parrington

message: The article has been expanded and reassessed as meeting the requirements for class C and Mid importance. Bruin2 (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reassessed
Talk:Société Générale de Belgique

message: See Suez's website. Alex lbh 21:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, seems that I was actually referring to the Generale Bank in the intro, not the Société. Intangible 21:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generale Bank which is the former name of Fortis (well, as a matter of fact, Fortis Bank, but the branding of the group tends to use only "Fortis" whenever possible). Alex lbh 22:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: And BTW, the sale of Generale Bank by Société Générale (controlled by SUEZ) to Fortis group in 1998 was one of the last moves in the dismantling of the Société Générale. Alex lbh 22:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History was incorrect 

message: I am trying to trace the original report and drawings which was produced by T de E in December 1969  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.14.141.218 (talk) 04:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traction de Electricite - Busanga D R of the Congo
Talk:Bayview – New York Bay Cemetery

message: For the uninitiated reader (I am not American let alone acquainted with the cemetery's locality), the "Ziegler" mentioned as serving as president of the cemetery ought to be more fully named.  I found no reference to him elsewhere on the page, nor any clue in the citation.Cloptonson (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's Ziegler?
Talk:Donner Lake

message: All records seem to indicate it was named after the Donner party not directly from the German word for thunder.   The Donner family for whom the Donner party is named seem to be German and the name may have original come from a nickname (note the speculative may).   However such discussions belong in an article on the family name. Erp (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Rolling anarchy

message: It has been suggested this article be merged into The Levellers (band) article. Two factors need to be taken into consideration: 1.) So far, this article is pretty scant; is there enough separate information about the rolling anarchy logo to justify a second article? 2.) Apart from its status as a trademark, is the logo so closely related to The Levellers as to justify the merger? For comparable treatment of trademarked logos, see Heartagram and HIM (band) jdbartlett 21:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think the Heartagram article should also be merged with a redirect into HIM (band).  Band logos are often notable, but I think anyone would be hard pressed to write more than a one-paragraph article about any but a few of them.  That's why I think they're better served as a part of the band article, where the information is more likely to be seen by interested readers anyway.  Also, my mistake on pointing the merge suggestion to the disambig. -Big Smooth 22:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an interesting point. Though both logos are trademarked by bands, are they strictly related to those bands or could they have application outside of advertising? These aren't band logos (in the sense of Take That's split plus sign logo, associated directly with their name), merely emblems whose trademark is held by bands. The heartagram especially has become a pop culture symbol in its own right. People will not necessarily associate either logo with its trademark-holding band. -jdbartlett 15:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Does anyone have a picture of the logo to go with this article? Thanks jdbartlett 21:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture