lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis

message: Not sure what Wiki's policy is on this but this article contains a ton of abbreviations, BBB, NAWM, CNS, etc.  While many are defined in the text, I was wondering if a "list of abbreviations" is ever a thing.  If so, this article could use one to make referencing easier.  --167.88.240.10 (talk) 23:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: List of abbreviations

message: So much overlap with Pathology of multiple sclerosis Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some overlap in the section Pathology of multiple sclerosis#Demyelination process and Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis#MS lesion development, but otherwise the content has a distinctive approach which is reflected in the article titles. The pathology article focusses on classical macroscopic pathology and modern imaging; the pathophysiology article does as the title suggests. The key issue is one of size; both articles are already over 100k each, and even removing duplication won't get the combined article under this size. Therefore, oppose merge on the grounds of WP:TOOBIG and that the current split has some logic to it (although there undoubtably other ways of splitting the content over more than one page). Klbrain (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Hello, the introduction image is not appropriate as it shows a peripheral neuron with schwann cells, which are not affected in MS. Here it should show a neuron with CNS type myelination by oligodendrocytes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SKPapillon (talk • contribs) 19:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction image
Talk:Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

message: Most of the article consisted of an MRI dataset. I'm not sure if there is any point in showing all the images. I'm moving it here for the time being. JFW | T@lk 20:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MRIs 

message: I've picked some recent sources that would be useful for further expansion. The Garg paper and the Pula paper are fairly good, but for the neuroradiological discussions I think we should also cite these (both by Bartynski):  and , and think about touching on  (recent large case series). JFW | T@lk 20:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding 

message: doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00111-8 JFW | T@lk 18:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Histopathology: doi:10.1093/jnen/nlx112 JFW | T@lk 15:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

text: doi:10.1016/j.jns.2019.07.018 focuses on imaging. JFW | T@lk 15:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

text: doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000640 - general review. JFW | T@lk 15:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancet Neurol review 

message: doi:10.1136/practneurol-2021-003194 JFW | T@lk 09:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional source
Talk:Primary central nervous system lymphoma

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.12938 JFW | T@lk 13:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Br J Haem review 

message: Review doi:10.1182/blood-2015-10-636340 JFW | T@lk 14:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stem cell transplantation 

message: doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-650101 JFW | T@lk 08:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omitting whole brain radiotherapy
Talk:Email Limited

message: This article describes an Australian Manufacturing company which was in existence for more
than 80 years.  It operated manufacturing plants in many parts of Australia and other countries.
During the 1980's and 1990's it was the largest manufacturing company in Australia outside of
the mineral processing  and automotive industries.   It played an important transformational
role in the Australian economy from an agrarian to a modern economy.   Many of the businesses,  
brands  and manufacturing operations initiated by Email Limited remain in operation today.
Reference: http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/asaw/biogs/A001026b.htm
A further reference
http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/tia/886.html#3584
Reference to current website which continues 80 year tradition of producing electricity meters under the 'Email' brand name
http://www.ampymetering.com.au/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eregli bob (talk • contribs) 12:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs sections; from a glance the external links section needs wikifying. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 02:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{[[Template:sections|sections]]}} tag 

message: myangaungmon@gmail.com Myangaungmon (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  myangaungmon@gmail.com 
Talk:Rancho Los Amigos Scale

message: External link yields:  "Error 404: EJCBD0006E: The resolution of a URI failed. Refer to the SystemOut.log for more detailed information. "  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.115.170 (talk) 20:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link is not working 

message: (Previously independent site was reorganized as subsection of LA County DHS website.) Lamerc (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found new location of original document, updated external link.
Talk:Subdural hygroma

message: I changed the ICD-10 code to D18.1 before. As much as it looks odd going to the lymphangioma code, which is a benign neoplasm code within Chapter II; this is were the trail for Hygroma points too. And can be verified by searching for hygroma on the online edition of ICD-10 (the 2016 version at time of writing). Sequelae codes could be used to enhance any hygromas of a known cause (e.g. haemorrhagic, traumatic) Little pob (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ICD-10 code

message: Subdural hygroma, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdural_hygroma
·I propose the addition of a content tab for Etiology and Pathophysiology of Subdural Hygromas (SHG). The information included includes more detailed pathophysiology of SHG, proposed reason for higher frequency in adults vs children, ·location in the brain where most frequent occurrence happens, two classes of SHG, Information found from PMID 9653522.
·I propose a modification of the content under the "Diagnosis" content tab. Propose an addition of information in regards to difficulty in diagnosis of SGH vs Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the majority of patient cases.
·I propose a modification of the content under "Signs and Symptoms" to include clinical SxS experienced by and reported by patients.
·I propose a modification to "Treatments" regarding outcomes. Include information regarding the self-limiting nature of SHG, rehydration as a treatment, and outcomes generally based on initial trauma/injury rather than SGH itself.
·The proposed edits to the article do not involve the removal of materials belonging to other editors at this time. This is seeking to update the article with information that may be more relevant to patients who have been diagnosed with SGH.
WilsonVuongUCSFPharmDStud (talk) 20:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2020 Group [6] Proposed Edits
Talk:Suboccipital puncture

message: I will find some references for this article, if I can. Not found Ayer's 1920 paper yet, so I will look in these biographical articles about him. (later) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14196739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5318399 RupertMillard (Talk) 15:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ayer biographical articles
Talk:Temporal arteritis

message: Some help on pathological diagnosis of steroid-treated TA:  JFW | T@lk 16:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good one JFW, reaffirms current view to get on with starting a patient on steroids, and not wait the extra couple days to arrange a biopsy out of fear might prevent a histological diagnosis being confirmed. Immunological markers interesting, but I wonder how many of them a typical District General Hospital has available ? David Ruben  Talk  17:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref

message: - Lancet review. JFW | T@lk 13:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancet 

message: should be included in every disease state article.Toyokuni3 (talk) 00:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Course and prognosis?

message: I recently attended a talk that suggested a diagnostic pathway that relied heavily on the 1990 ACR criteria (found here - ). These are said to have high sensitivity and specificity. Basically, it recommends a biopsy only if there are two other criteria present: any less and a theoretically positive biopsy would still not lead to 3/5 criteria being met. Also, if there are three other criteria already present, a negative biopsy would still lead to 3-4/5 positive criteria and therefore not greatly alter the decision whether to treat. Sadly I have no access to the notes I took during that talk, but this seems to be the gist of it. JFW | T@lk 06:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pubmed search for Major subject headings. Numerous reviews, but the first one free is in 2003... JFW | T@lk 06:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACR criteria
Talk:Thrombolysis

message: Thrombolysis isn't just pharma, it can also be done though devices --e.g. Those that use HIFU. --216.9.250.104 (talk) 23:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  current definition a bit too limited 

message: I suggest merging Thrombolytic drug into Thrombolysis. There's an awful lot of overlap between the two articles at present. Both are quite short and both have been around since 2004.  Comments? Qwfp (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not in favor, these seems distinct enough topics that we should leave them separate, even if they are currently similar.  Ultrasound thrombolysis and other invasive non-drug treatments are on the horizon. Pro crast in a tor (talk) 19:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: review on dosing and indications for thrombolysis in children. JFW | T@lk 21:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kids 

message: Formation of blood clots lies at the basis of a number of serious diseases (see below). By breaking down the clot, the disease process can be arrested, or the complications reduced. While other anticoagulants (such as heparin) prevent the "growth" of a clot, thrombolytic agents actively reduce the size of the clot.
Most thrombolytic agents work by activating the enzyme plasminogen, which clears the cross-linked fibrin mesh (the backbone of a clot). This makes the clot soluble and subject to further proteolysis by other enzymes, and restores blood flow over occluded blood vessels.
Principles of preventing blood clots from forming are handled by clinicians who assess the risk and if the risk of developing blood clots, the use of thrombolytic agents may be prevented. Oftentimes, thombolytic interventions are used with thrombosis prophylaxis.
-- Jytdog (talk) 01:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Principles

message: I think thrombolytic drug and contraindications to thrombolysis should both be merged here. JFW | T@lk 00:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with contraindications 

message: Already largely duplicated on target page where it would be better  presented Iztwoz (talk) 08:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to note that I proposed merge,  prompted by Merge needed posted by  JFW. However Reperfusion therapy is new to me and perhaps Jytdog's proposal is a better alternative ? --Iztwoz (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: in that case, would support(go along w/ Jyt proposal)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

text: hmm.  was thinking of consolidating them all as they are poorly knit together now but you are right that would be monumental.  I would be happy with the merge of thombolytic drugs here, and making this an intervention article. Jytdog (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Thrombolytic drug]]
Talk:Tolosa–Hunt syndrome

message: In about an hours time I should have finished converting this from a stub to a start class article. I've resourced the article, noting references appropriately, and expanded significantly into sections (signs and symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, epidemiology). Any issues please contact me on my talk page. CycloneNimrod (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major revamp

message: my husband is 54 and has had THS for 7 years. firstly infrequent attacks now permanent loss of normal eye vision and frequent headaches pain and weekness,leathargy andmuscle pain without respite.
no cures found from your lists. just a depressing life to look forward to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antifamilymang (talk • contribs) 02:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from end of article 

message: I am a 39 year old female and have had Tolosa-Hunt syndrome for 11 years. I have been on infliximab and a low dose of methotrexate for the past 6 years. Immediately after starting infliximab treatments, my symptoms were gone. I have been in remission of THS since beginning the treatment. Steroid treatment as noted in this article did not work for me. 
Melaniesue72 (talk) 16:48, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am a patient with THS
Talk:Witzelsucht

message: Is it really known as "Excrementum Taurus" ? Sounds like phony Latin for "bullshit" that someone added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.251.222 (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential vandalism

message: Because if you don’t know a lot of your maths you could have it   It’s really dangerous so get someone to test you out 90.246.219.244 (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant paragraph is Functional behavior. It's not because you're joking that you're suffering the disease - it's not a disease in itself by the way but rather a coincidental indicator of neurological damage. Missing some of the required maths may lead to future regrets, melancholy because of lost opportunities etc; it may also come to none of this if it happens that that one had been mature enough somehow. The point with Witzelsucht is that it's a field where there is only a low level of subjectivity possible therefore the test matters only in relationship with neurological evidence. MRI etc. today --Askedonty (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also to see if you have brain damage you need something to test you in maths to see
Talk:Fasciotomy

message: The cited article, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001224.htm claims that debridement of necrosis may not be indicated for bites by a certain family of snake, a Bushmaster. The article does not dispute the need for fasciotomy due to compartment syndrome after snakebite. --Systemloc (talk) 20:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faciotomy for snake bite 

message: I'm not sure "people who spend long periods of time on their feet" are "likely" to need a fasciotomy 77.101.238.171 (talk) 18:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you doubt they're more likely to need it than those who don't? --198.49.180.40 (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Yes. This claim is baseless. Standing upright for extended periods of time in the setting of venous insufficiency causes lymphedema, which is separate and unrelated to compartment syndrome. --Systemloc (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really?
Talk:Hypnosurgery

message: What is up with this article? Should it even be on wikipedia so poorly sourced as it is right now? (anonym, 6 April 2016, at 21:21)
:+1--Heebi (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost no citations 

message: *Hypnosis as Adjunct Therapy in Conscious Sedation for Plastic Surgery.
*Hypnosedation: a valuable alternative to traditional anaesthetic techniques.
*Hypnosedation, a new method of anesthesia for cervical endocrine surgery.
Perhaps somebody may evaluate and add these sources? --Heebi (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: possible citations?
Talk:Latin League

message: Does anyone know what the Latin League was called in Latin? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.1.177.177 (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2007‎ (UTC)
:
:—Wiki Wikardo 22:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  in latin 

message: Proper nouns should be capitalized. FilipeS (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move: Latin league → Latin League 

message: I came to this article from Roman nationality law looking for a list of the places included in the Latin League.  Scarykitty (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article could use a list

message: The cities of the Latin League: Alba Longa, Antemnae, Ardea, Aricia, Babento, Bovillae, Cabum, Cora, Carvento, Circei, Corioli, Corbio, Fidenae, Fortinea, Gabii, Labici, Lanuvium, Lavinium, Laurentum, Nomentum, Norba, Praeneste, Pedum, Querquetulum, Satricum, Scaptia, Setia, Tellenae, Tibur, Tusculum, Tolerium and Velletri. says Italian Wikipedia: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lega_Latina Böri (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lega Latina
Talk:Ambulatory care

message: -  Clarification?  First the article says that emergency medicine is associated with hospital admission and so is not ambulatory care, then it says one of the categories of ambulatory care is emergency medical care.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junckerg (talk • contribs) 23:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

message: :I made some clarifications (with references) on accepted definitions and settings of ambulatory care across health-care systems, with distinction in overlap with emergency medicine and relevance to hospital admission. Hope this helps. Guptan99 (talk) 16:33, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conservation medicine

message: Would Symbiosis be a related topic?  97.87.29.188 (talk) 22:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, why?  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would [[Symbiosis]] be a related topic? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lrokos (talk) 14:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology
Talk:Environmental medicine

message: The American Academy of Env. Med. ref'd here is widely considered an illegitimate quack organization. PalMD (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: There are two categories of "environmental medicine": (1) The "legitimate" one, described in this article, and represented by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. The OCOEM oversees Board Certification in Occupational and Environmental Medicine. It is recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties, and (2) Clinical ecology, sometimes called EM, represented by the American Academy of Environmental Medicine. It too has a certifying board, the American Board of Environmental Medicine. It is not recognized by the ABMS, and is widely considered "alternative" or "fringe". 
These two categories should be kept segregated in separate articles, or sets of articles. 
Valerius Tygart (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:G. E. Moore

message: G. E. Moore died on 24 October 1958; he was cremated at Cambridge Crematorium on 28th October 1958 and his ashes interred at the Ascension Parish Burial Ground, Cambridge; his wife, Dorothy Moore (1892-1977) was buried there. Together they had two sons, the poet Nicholas Moore and the composer Timothy Moore.
2.27.130.190 (talk) 18:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BURIAL/CREMATION: A MUCH-NEEDED CORRECTION 

message: Russell was a mathematician, first and foremost. He found fault with set definitions given by Cantor and Weierstrauss. He showed the validity of Peano's work over that of the non-formal assertions of these works. Why is this social philosophy nonsense regarded with equal weight?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.77.97 (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fame Ruseel vs Moore 

message: — Assignment last updated by RudyCarnap (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHIL 390 Contemporary Philosophy
Category talk:Military medicine

message: I added Category:Military science on the grounds that (a) medicine is a science that uses technology, not a technology itself; (b) the sort of entries in cat Military Technology didn't seem parallel to Military medicine in breadth, and (c) and that in looking for the Military Medicine cat (for the Battlemind page, I naturally looked until Military Science cat, found nothing, and couldn't see a natural path to it.  rewinn (talk) 04:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Military science
Talk:Prosthetist

message: Hi, a suggestion has been made on the talk page of Orthotics to combine this article with the information on Prothestist. Does anyone else have any ideas of feedback? Thanks!JenOttawa (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that’s a good idea. Or perhaps to have 3 seperate articles. Currently about half of this article talks about the combined profession and the rest specifically about being a prosthetist. As a prosthetist myself, I find this article rather underwhelming Timothy N-F (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine with [[Orthotist]]?
Talk:I'm for You

message: If the page is improved it could stay,--72.95.128.82 11:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Free (talk) (HRWiki) 16:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reproductive endocrinology and infertility

message: Each fact in this article is sourced so the reader is able to verify and learn more on each point. I chose this article because it is on a subject that I don’t know much about but would like to learn more on which is why I appreciated how in depth the descriptions were and how accurately the editors attributed the sources so that I could research more of the points that I needed to understand more on. The editors kept there additions relevant to the title and made sure to further explain or define points that someone reading who isn’t familiar with the topic could understand; which is hard with articles on medical topics. The editors were able to stay neutral, unbiased, and informative and pulled information from sources that were neutral as well such as endocrinology and infertility specialists and obstetrics and gynecology specialists which were the sources of information. I checked the links of the references and they all work and are reputable sources that add a lot of great information to this article. The information is as recent as 2012, but there has been quite a bit of research in this area so I believe that the information could be updated to be more recent. I wish this article was longer and offered more insight to the different causes or reasons for infertility rather than just defining the subject in broad terms. 
KAI2114961 (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Clostridial necrotizing enteritis

message: Hi! I edited a sentence to change the first person 'we' to passive voice ('is not recommended' instead of 'we do not recommend'), but I'm not sure who that original 'we' was referring to, and so the language is still unclear. 173.66.129.207 (talk) 21:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of first person language