lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Matthew Wilson

message: Can someone please find a better picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukedpotter (talk • contribs) 
Anyone know why the box of facts isn't showing the correct figures that are in the article edit page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SJ28 (talk • contribs) 
:Fixed. The parameter name was incorrect. Prolog 10:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does footage exist? If so, can someone link it to the crash information please? (Edited by Sona 2 safety car at the junction which crashed occured: no footage exists of the crash non was allowed to be filmed by the police. AG, Sona 2 Medic)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fitz41 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2005 crash 

message: Its the same Matthew Wilson that participe in Formula Renault ? I've added categories for Formula Renault drivers but i'm not sure. - Rollof1 (talk) 10:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula Renault ? 
Talk:Strong Medicine (novel)

message: The article claims that Strong Medicine is a 1984 novel while at the same time it says that the book was published in 1975. Obviously at least one of the dates is incorrect. Anyone has more info? 195.113.13.151 (talk) 12:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication date
Template talk:Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission

message: I made this template yesterday. The order is the PHMC website tour order - should it be alphabetized instead? If so, what about things PHMC puts together like Erie Maritime Museum & U.S. Brig Niagara - split them or keep them together in order of the first item? Thanks, Ruhrfisch 17:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking that it should be alphabetized for ease of use.  I'd keep the Erie Maritime Museum and US Brig Niagara together as one item, since they appear to  be at the same facility.  As for other pairings, I'd suggest if they are at the same general location or maybe administered from the same location, then they should be listed together.  VerruckteDan 17:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is alphabetized (I think ;-) ). I kept the ones PHMC puts together as one entry joined by an ampersand &. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 05:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The updated template looks good to go. Now I need to find the info. The POV in lots of the information for these museums is pretty skewed towards the "glory" of the parks Dincher 21:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:SideOneDummy Records

message: I like the layout of your text, but this is wikipedia. Surely you'll get buttfucked for 'neutrality' reasons!
86.151.94.181 17:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Isn't MxPx signed under SideOne? Tikuko 12:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MxPx 

message: Is it really necissary? Seems like duplicating musicbrainz' goals less effectively and efficiently. I've gone ahead and linked to musicbrainz in the article, but I'll hold off on deleting the catalog to allows others to comment. Zytsef (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems a little shabby to me is all. The list here is far from complete and I'm certainly not inclined to keep it updated. Also, the list here doesn't link to any releases which might have a page of their own, so it doesn't seem like it's especially useful. A really comprehensive list of releases would probably be too long to be useful in the article (see the list at musicbrainz) and to keep it updated reliably it would probably need more than a couple of contributors working on it. Zytsef (talk) 03:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it should be removed per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY.  "Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed."  As mentioned above, an external link is much more appropriate.  Most other record labels only list particularly important records and singles.  134.84.96.142 (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Catalog
Talk:Karl Mannheim

message: some external comments on Karl Mannheim found from the net... could be useful!
--Alveolate 11:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Proofs/Archive 1

message: After some discussion about whether certain formulas in an article were correct or not, and the proper means of deriving them, I was movitivated to construct a prototype experimental page demonstrating a "proof" for a claim made in an article. The goal of this page is as discussed above: to provide support for claims, without cluttering the main article itself. To see this in action, please visit the article Laplace operator (as of april 27 2005). About 2/3rds of the way down will be a formula, and to the right of the formula, in some smaller letters, a link (proof) which will take you to an article Laplace operator/Proofs which will provide the detail for the claim.
The current standing proposal is to put all article proofs into a /Proofs subdirectory, so that any such secondary, supporting material always ends up in the same location for any article, and is thus easy to find. However, this is appearently a controversial area within WP, see Wikipedia:Subpages. 
I request the community to play a bit with the concept and the layout: How does it feel? Can we make this work?  Can we get (proof) to sit to the far-right of the formula somehow? Replace it with a cute icon or a macro of some kind? What about the proof page itself? What should the "house style" be?  Will we be able to keep proof pages from morphing into full-blown articles? Or will they morph into some other ugly beast? Give it a shot. linas 00:15, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like the title Laplace operator/Proofs.  It it subordinates the article to another article.  Certainly they should link to each other, but a reader may come to this article without having read the one whose title precedes the slash. Michael Hardy 21:21, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Another option would be to put them in a namespace, like Proof:Laplace operator. Hv 11:06, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Prototype for proving article claims
Talk:Duane Reade

message: I have nominated this article to be checked for its neutrality due to its disproportionally large "Criticism" section, which lacks citations. Furthermore, NPOV tags have been placed on this page in the past and removed without significant edits or any discussion.
Waphle 17:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the tag as unwarranted.  The "citation needed" tags in the criticism section are sufficient, as the facts are correct. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk/cont) 03:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Just a bit of a sarcastic comment: Real Editors don't use tags. (j/k ofc). Seriously tho, why take the time to hang up a "problem here" sign when it's about as easy to just fix the problem? Eaglizard (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sarcasm aside, it is not at all easy.  The lead here currently says that two publications ranked Duane Reade, under Cohen's leadership, the best-performing chain.  Publication names alone would be fine, except both have many long articles in FindArticles alone, and I'm still looking for articles from them that give those claims outright.  It would be far too easy to whitewash Duane Reade here—certainly much easier than finding such vaguely-cited sources. --an odd name 21:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Here are PDFs for other language Wikipedias:
* Arabic: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Arabic.pdf
* Chinese:
** Simplified: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/ChineseSimp.pdf
** Traditional: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/ChineseTrad.pdf
* French: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/French.pdf
* Greek: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Greek.pdf
* Haitian Creole: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/HaitianCreole.pdf
* Hebrew: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Hebrew.pdf
* Italian: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Italian.pdf
* Korean: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Korean.pdf
* Polish: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Polish.pdf
* Spanish: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Spanish.pdf
* Yiddish: http://www.duanereade.com/files/pharmacy/Yiddish.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages

message: The website link no longer works (dead link) GamerKlim9716 (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website
Talk:Diana Gould (writer)

message: I removed the stub tags. I have substantially expanded and reorganized the article. It does not deserve these tags any longer. If I am wrong, please let me know. Drinkingwaterdoc (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Tags 

message: The notability tag has been on this article since Nov 2012 with no followup. It is clear from her career, article citations and WP links that Diana Gould's biography passes the test of notability. Her recent, successful novel supports her notability status.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drinkingwaterdoc (talk • contribs) 17:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Template talk:Bucks County, Pennsylvania

message: I don't think that Devil's Half Acre belongs in the "unincorporated communities" section of the template.  It seems to me like it's just a place of interest.  Any objections? --RunnerupNJ 13:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - it is not a place anyone lives now, so it is not a community. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 14:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it's not so common in Pennsylvania, counties nationwide have ghost towns in their county template.  Why remove this one?  Nyttend (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not realize this was a common practice in other states - since that is the case I strike my previous comment and am OK with including this, thanks Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 19:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, many places include the ghost towns separately: see  and several other Utah counties for examples.  I prefer to keep it simple (i.e. anything that's unincorporated and not a CDP goes in the "unincorporated communities", whether or not it's currently inhabited), but there's plenty of precedent for listing ghost towns separately from populated unincorporated areas.  Nyttend (talk) 00:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also be OK with this. There are many lumber ghost towns in northern Pennsylvania. Masten has an article but is not in the county nav box, for example. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 02:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not inclined to leave such situations that way; therefore, I've added a county template to Masten and I've added Masten to the county template.  I've put it under Ghost Town for the simple reason that there are no non-CDP unincorporated communities in the county.  Nyttend (talk) 02:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for taking care of that, Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 02:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Devil's Half Acre
Talk:Amory, Mississippi

message: i love a\Amory!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.117.112 (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  amory!! 
Template talk:Delaware County, Pennsylvania

message: Aronimink is the name of the neighborhood in Upper Darby Township around the portion of Burmont Road south of State Road.  There is no wikipedia article for the neighborhood yet.  I believe that it's just a coincidence that it shares its name with a golf course in Newtown Square (kind of like how Overbrook golf course is in Radnor Township, not in Overbrook, and kind of like how Philadelphia Country Club is north of Gladwyne, not in Philadelphia). Spikebrennan 18:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Murieston

message: I wrote the original piece. Found it difficult to think of anything more significant to add.
There certainly isn't much, really. Even the former inhabitants of the old estates of Murieston and Dresselrigg seem not to have left any mark on history. BTW I'm not sure what the boundaries of Murieston are; if the railway line marks the boundary of Murieston with Bellsquarry and Bankton then Murieston has no shops at all... :) Peter R Hastings 13:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007
Category talk:Canadian players of American football

message: Nearly all Canadians who play American football are expatriates living in the United States.  However this shouldn't be a subcat of :Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in the United States since American football is played outside the United States.  See :Category:American football by country.  Someday a Canadian may become a player for the Kolbotn Kodiaks or Frankfurt Galaxy. -- Prove It (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Luzerne County, Pennsylvania

message: There are a fairly significant number of CDP's in Luzerne County that the Census Bureau has added since it redrew the maps in 2003. It does not usually issue press releases for such events and the new map will wait for next year. I would appreciate seeing the source documents so that I can add pages as needed. CDP's serve no jurisdictional purpose and are sets designated solely for statistical purposes. Heff01 (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Batfink

message: Official UK website clearly states it as "Battillac", this also fits better with the Cadillac style it was based on than "Battleac".
Philbuck222 23:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Battilac/Battleac

message: I'm not convinced that Batfink was ever shown in the "Magic Roundabout" slot on BBC1, just before the early evening news.  Can anyone verify this? 194.75.128.200 18:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC in the 70s? 

message: I'm in Sydney Australia and I remember watching Batfink well before 2004. It was probably while I was in school which means in the 1960s or 70s. Perhaps it was on air in Australia at or around the same time as it was on the BBC. BBC shared a lot of content with the Australian government-operated television station ABC and the programs were mostly shown about 6mths after they were shown in the UK.
It screened  5 mornings a week on  ATV 0 "All Electric Non-Stop Cartoon Carnival until 1975 in Melbourne,  I saw it btween mid 1973 and mid 1974  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wenlockburton (talk • contribs) 10:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batfink in Australia 

message: Secondary and tertiary sources differ as to when the series was created, first aired, and syndicated.  The best secondary source to resolve this is probably David Mackey's filmography of the series, cited here and here.  The filmography was published in the Sept. 1993 issue of Frames Per Second, a magazine which is sadly shuttered.  I have not been able to find any holdings for this work in worldcat or google books, nor has author Dave Mackey responded to an email query.  
Dave Mackey's website was cited as the source for List of Batfink episodes.  I've verified the site existed as described using the Internet Archive.  Given that Mackey was able to get his musing on batfink published in an independent, reliable secondary source, and given the breadth and depth of the content on his website, I'm going to cite his work for the date of creation (1966) and remove the "contradicts" tag.
Lesser Cartographies (talk) 01:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on the "contradictory" tag 

message: Removing Russia SpaceToon. 188.32.105.144 (talk) 05:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 August 2016 
Talk:The She Beast

message: Two things here, people: Count von Helsing is not Abraham Van Helsing from Dracula (their names aren't even spelt the same), so please don't link the name to the Van Helsing article; a trivia item (and trivia items are discouraged in Wikipedia) regarding an unrelated production that Steel was involved in 40 years after the fact is completely irrelevant here.  If you must add sludge to a trivia section, at least have the sense to include trivia related to the subject of the article. 12.22.250.4 23:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent cleanup

message: I have deleted the link to the illicit hosting of this British film on Internet Archive. Co-writer Charles B. Griffith did not die until 2007, so UK copyright subsists until the end of 2077. As a non-US film still under copyright in its country of origin on 1 January 1996, it is protected in the US for 95 years after publication, so to the end of 2061. Nick Cooper (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status 

message: I somehow doubt the comment about Groper being an apt name and the final sentence of the plot being a question match the encyclopaedic style that wikipedia hopes to present 207.179.167.106 (talk) 22:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Tone
Talk:Cochabamba social unrest of 2007

message: This page created to move info on the event from the Evo Morales page to its own article.--Wowaconia 17:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Evo Morales funded the war on Mafred Reyes villa. There are pictures of government offcials providing the protesters with military rations so they could debunk the prefect  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.105.166.6 (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reality 

message: There's quite a bit of value laden language throughout this text, taking sides verbally. I'll put some work into changing or highlighting in over the coming weeks.--Carwil (talk) 15:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag
Talk:Iris Johansen

message: SOMEONE SAID THAT HER BIBLIOGRAPHY WAS OUTDATED, I DON'T KNOW IF ANY BOOKS WERE ADDED, BUT OTHER GOOGLED LISTS FOR SPECIFICALLY THE EVE DUNCAN SERIES IN ORDER,
DIDN'T MANAGE TO GIVE ME EVEN THAT, BECAUSE THEY RANDOMLY ADDED OTHER BOOKS, THIS IS THE 1ST LIST WITH "ALL" HER BOOKS IN ORDER, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY ADDITIONS, BUT ASIDE FROM THEM, THIS LIST IS AWESOME AND I WANT TO SINCERELY COMPLIMENT WHOEVER MADE IT, YAK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ILLADELZYAK (talk • contribs) 18:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lynn Kurland

message: added the three families. not sure on the spellings of any of the last names other than de Piaget.
Tydoni (talk) 00:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Day Leclaire

message: I have reverted to the previous version of this article because the most recent version had copyrighted text from Ms. Leclaire's webpage.  If it is decided that the copyrighted text is more appropriate here, this process should be followed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Confirmation_of_permission  (it will also make sure that Ms. Leclaire's email address is not available for everyone to see: spam=bad).
I have doubts, though, on whether the other text actually belongs on Wikipedia.  I found the biography at dayleclaire.com to be a very interesting read, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and in my opinion the other biography was not structured as an encyclopedic entry -- it was more of a nice letter to a friend.
If you disagree and think we should put the copyrighted version back (after the appropriate permission process has been followed), please discuss here.
Thanks! Karanacs 18:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography text from Day Leclaire's Website
Talk:Catherine Storr

message: The newspaper obituaries give Storr's death as January 6, the ODNB gives it as January 8.  Since the latter names the death certificate among its sources I have put this as the date, noting the uncertainty in the footnotes.  I'm not sure if this is right. N p holmes (talk) 07:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date problem 
Talk:Tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride

message: "As a 1 M solution in tetrahydrofuran, TBAF has been used to dissolve cured polydimethylsiloxane.[5]"
How is this information relevant for an encyclopedia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.60.152.125 (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is not a notable use, so I have removed it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:38, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dissolving cured polydimethylsiloxane
Talk:Ableism

message: The redirect Autiphobia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 07:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Autiphobia]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The anti-autism page is linked on the “Part of a series on Discrimination” page among numerous other forms of discrimination, but ableism itself is missing. This page should be added to that sidebar. Vstartesla (talk) 01:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not on the “Discrimination Series” sidebar 

message: — Assignment last updated by Liliput000 (talk) 00:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I am considering whether or not my group should create a new page for "Internalised ableism" under the Types of Ableism section or if we should just add to this page and expand on the information that is already there. Gek21 (talk) 05:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My group members and I decided on creating a new article for Internalized Ableism in an effort to provide more information about the topic without overwhelming this page. If you have any feedback for us please let us know on the talk page! Gek21 (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Race, Gender, and Medicine
Talk:Medical procedure

message: Costs of medical tests????
:Costs vary so widely around the world that it's definitely not worth trying to address that issue in this article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Costs

message: Ops 111.119.183.37 (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Daniel Berkeley Updike

message: Just rewrote some of this, grammar changes and rearranged sentences. Tried not to change the meaning. There were a few things I did not change, because I don't know what the original writer was trying to say: the paragraph about Updike's parents is very confusing; also the later paragraph about Merrymount's predecessor Caswell. Also, article states that Merrymount catered to an upper class clientele--this is contradicted by info in "The Well-Made Book." Did not change tho. Thanks! KittyKitty Nichols (talk) 19:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote portions 

message: I don't want to edit this anonymously, but the archives of the Merrymount Press (which includes most of Updike's personal correspondence as well) are at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California. The finding aid for the collection is now available
through the Online Archive of California https://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8j96csq/entire_text/
ETA: Copies of the job tickets are at the Athenaeum, as well as some of Updike's correspondence. 
--74.212.198.162 (talk) 00:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:Minardi PS01

message: It says in the article that the team were unclassified as they didn't score any points. Aren't all teams (and drivers for that matter) classified if they finish a race? Cdhaptomos talk–contribs 17:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the rules changed at some point; the Formula One Yearbook series of annuals seems to indicate that this happened after 2001 and before 2003 (in 2002, of course, all of the teams scored points), although it would be useful if anyone had a more concrete source of information.--Midgrid(talk) 18:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclassified?