Talk:Internet Engineering Task Force

message: Internet Engineering Steering Group is a functional unit of the Internet Engineering Task Force. There is no strong indication of independent notability and can be merged here without causing an WP:UNDUE issue or making this article unmanageable. ~Kvng (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Internet Engineering Steering Group]] 

message: - This Talk page was long and the items from 2005-2016 had all been resolved. Follow the H:ARC process, those older items can now be found on Talk:Internet_Engineering_Task_Force/Archive_1 - Dyork (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have set up automatic archiving so this doesn't happen again. ~Kvng (talk) 13:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 1 page created 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Community Tech bot 2600:6C5D:5100:96B:14DE:10F2:E8F6:8168 (talk) 01:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) estar8806 (talk) ★ 04:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Internet Engineering Task Force →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME and MOS:ACROTITLE: "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject". PhotographyEdits (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

text: @PhotographyEdits, do you have any evidence to present? ~Kvng (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 November 2023 

message: Changes amongst consumer loyalty, product d and factors such as Moorse Law are the constraints placed on paramiterizing computational learning curves for both program and Devs users and Regulation forces. All of which are mandatory industrially and financed as frequently as product placement. Strategy and insight which coupled with fortune-telling is the only art in town which allows for innovation to take a T.O. and reimage and engage with the Specific Devs that make the harmonization between users and platforms of tech and their roll outs affordable and possible. With Flavors now being distro in Macro and Micro for the Big or Small trends and Comps that have been hauling their and setting them up for ... annihilation? Or is that just paranoia from a more conventional analog side of Market and Development? Given current trends and uncertainty in leaders of the day why isn't Everything AND Everyone doing innovation and sOFtheART Dev like how biggest leaders in (have been) doing tech does it? Tantalizing and Forecasting competitions and landmark achievements with predictable timelines give and take rally points insights into marketable shares and consumers in-house standardized policy with Open Channel Sourced Guidelines that can privatize and equalize quality and support sources precious in demand for leverage ane capital assets guarded and earmarked for up to 25 years out almost infallibly. What's the downside or counterpoint? Honestly?
Wmcarteresq & Google & G4C3inc & Microsoft Bing & N_eX.t-1.1.1 Meekrab2012 (talk) 19:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEXT: Google Gem or Microsoft Bing. Billion Dollar Bubble? Trillion Dollar Babys'?