lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Upsilon Andromedae c

message: After review, I've determined that this article meets the qualifications for GA status. It is well written, well referenced, and comprehensive. I'm "Mass Passing" this article along with 9 others. The entire list is below. If new developments arise that would effect the references or comprehensiveness of this article, it may affect the others as well.
* 55 Cancri b
* 55 Cancri c
* 55 Cancri d
* 55 Cancri e
* 16 Cygni
* 16 Cygni Bb
* Upsilon Andromedae 
* Upsilon Andromedae b
* Upsilon Andromedae c
* Upsilon Andromedae d
Keep up the good work. These articles are ideal "good articles". They can't be FA, because there is no way for them to get long enough, but they are as comprehensive and complete as possible, and represent a good effort on the part of the editors. Feel free to message me if you have any questions about my rationale. Phidauex 18:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a [[WP:GA|Good Article]]

message: are Upsilon Andromedae c and d confirmed exoplanets? thanks.--190.21.202.38 (talk) 21:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: confirmed?

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: I know that the distinguishing low-mass brown dwarfs from high-mass planets is rather difficult, but If the planet mass is 13.98 then it should be qualified as a brown dwarf star. Is it not true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donlevone (talk • contribs) 21:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible brown dwarf? 

message: Why are we using a radial velocity minimum mass (1.98 Jupiter masses), as opposed to the astrometrically-derived true mass (13.98 Jupiter masses)? 46.126.76.193 (talk) 07:39, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass in the infobox 
Talk:Lafayette High School (Kentucky)

message: I'm just wandering, should this be considered a stub anymore? It seems fairly well detailed. Kycowboyntv 16:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted the stub icon.  QuizQuick  23:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2006

message: Please add pictures for a higher article rating (b class). Thank you! Kycowboyntv 03:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2007

message: I'm not sure a high school baseball team would have the notability necessary for its own article; suggest merging the accomplishments and notable team members with the article on the school. 331dot (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than the state championships, which is already in the article and unreferenced in both places, there is nothing to merge. Nearly all of the team article is content that would not be encyclopedic in a school article.  High school sports teams do not generally have articles on Wikipedia: as such, I do not even see it as a plausable search term.  I will be nominating that article for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   Works for me.  I agree that there should not be an article on the team. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Lafayette High School Baseball Team (Lexington, KY)]]

message: reverted my expansion of the article saying, "Unsourced changes".  However, in my expansion of 13 August 2019 at 17:28 UTC, everything I added to the article was duly sourced to a reliable source.  Can anybody explain John from Idegon's edit?  —  fourthords | =Λ= | 18:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest you read the guidelines for school articles at WP:SCH/AG and in light of those guidelines, please make an argument for inclusion of what you have added.  We do not list staff, we use secondary sources for attendance, etc.  I see nothing constructive in your changes. John from Idegon (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, so not "Unsourced changes", but "changes out of compliance with WikiProject guidelines".  That being corrected: you removed enrollment statistics, the school's address & classification, and staffing numbers that were all sourced to National Center for Education Statistics, yet WikiProject Schools' article guidelines say nothing about prohibiting that information or that source.  In fact, those facts are specifically called-out as appropriate for inclusion; how is it not constructive?  —  fourthords | =Λ= | 19:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: reversion rationale

message: For example, the available arts to major in inside of the SCAPA program, and what being in the Pre-Engineering program entails. Checkerberry (talk) 22:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be great, but content must first derive from citations to published reliable sources, and the sources already in the article have been wrung out.  —  Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Should more details about the SCAPA and Pre-Engineering programs be included?
Talk:Rejimen Askar Wataniah

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Childers Reforms

message: Perhaps "tribal" could be defined with a few salient examples. Varlaam (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tribal" 

message: Currently, as far as I'm aware, it only gets a few lines in Cavalry regiments of the British Army. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the "later changes" section mention the cavalry amalgamations of 1921-22?
Talk:Magnus Erlendsson, Earl of Orkney

message: Should it say "first Earl of Orkney to bear that title" or is he just Magnus I? Srnec 21:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mark Pilgrim (software developer)

message: Mark's written a good book on Python, but Wikipedia biography pages should be dedicated to folks with more accomplishments. Which is I think Mark's own point in his request.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.23.39 (talk) 21:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So open a new deletion request and explain why the legitimate consensus reached against deletion last time was faulty.  The Wednesday Island (talk) 00:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with Deletion request 

message: I'm surprised that there's no mention of Mark PIlgrim's earlier escapades - specifically when he released several viruses (one of which I believe he wrote) from a computer lab where he worked at Cornell.  It was on the heels of an earlier incident, about five years before when another Cornell student released a worm.  I came across this link to his indictment:  http://www.rbs2.com/dsb.htm as well as a New York Times article -- http://www.nytimes.com/1992/02/25/nyregion/police-link-computer-virus-to-2-at-cornell.html.  As I recall, he was expelled from the university as well.  Why has no one mentioned this?  In terms of his career now, it's notable that he overcame some very serious issues, for lack of a better word.  --CountryMama27 (talk) 04:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — Hex (❝?!❞) 11:30, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1992 Arrest?
Talk:Perforce Jam

message: :KJam is the fastest build system available today. It is the fastest for both full and incremental builds. It has the fastest dependency scanner of any current build system.
Sounds like hype. I've removed this until it can be substantiated. - furrykef (Talk at me) 21:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I've always been taught that "jam" was an acronym for "Just Another Make", in which case this should be mentioned after the first use of the term.  A lot of web pages seem to agree, but the only mention of the phrase I could find on the Perforce web site was a mailing list message. —FlashSheridan 02:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we'd need a source that can trace it back to Perforce itself, since Wikipedia relies upon verifiable information. - furrykef (Talk at me) 11:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That phrase is used directly under the title on this page http://public.perforce.com/wiki/Jam Witherj (talk) 10:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "jam" an acronym for "Just Another Make" 

message: I went to the Perforce company website and there's no mention of Perforce Jam besides a historical document repository last updated over three years ago.[] There are also no formal end of life announcements or press releases that I can find. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this product still around?
Talk:The New Dinosaurs

message: Isn't it widely speculated or excepted that these V-Raptors (or raptors very much like them) would have evolved into big eyed bipedal, large brained intelligent being? I saw an illustration of this and it was fascinating. Why isn’t a creature like this mentioned? Surely 65 million years would have produced a being  like this.
-G
Changed your heading. Does anyone else think they look scary? (AndrewAnorak 17:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I highly doubt that such a creature would have evolved, even when given 65,000,000 Years of evolution. It's possible, but i doubt it. I know that humans were unlikely & we evolved, but hey I can imagine the transitional forms for humans. Can the same be said for that creature? Anyway, evolution takes the road of less resistance. Our ancestors seemed predisposed to evolve into us. They had the proper genetics & frankly I think that they look at least a little bit like us. Raptors seemed predisposed to evolve into killers. I think that the Raptors presented in The Speculative Dinosaur Project are more likely.
Then again the "V-raptors" (im assuming that its the Cutlassteeth) are Basal Coelurids, Not Dromaeosaurs--50.138.213.207 (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosauroids 

message: Is anyone willing to start the The Speculative Dinosaur Project article?. - 20:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Speculative Dinosaur Project 

message: I've heard of various projects that talk about "What if the K-T extinction had not happened", but I have yet to hear about "What if vertebrates had not evolved" (Arthropods and Mollusks would probably be the dominant lifeforms). That would be a very interesting project. An even stranger project would be "What if Vertebrates, Arthropods & Mollusks had not evolved". What could possibly be the dominant lifeform then?. Another Interesting Project would be "What if the permian extinction had not happened". Any comments would be appreciated. - 21:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing an asteroid impact is logically correct, but "something has not evolved per se" is logically flawed because it requires changing laws of evolution. One has to make up sequence of events with such results first. The more plausible scenario might be "what if K-T event was much larger and killed all vertebrates". Alliumnsk (talk) 07:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Raptors could not walk humans' way, because hominid evolution involved switching from herbivory to predation. Raptors had to became herbivorous first :) Primates are not notable amongst mammals, so I guess less advanced dinosaurs would have greater chances of evolving sentience. Alliumnsk (talk) 07:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other "What if..." projects
Talk:Cathedral Basilica of St. Joseph (San Jose)

message: I have searched the National Park Service web site, and though I can find the Cathedral listed on the National Register of Historic Places, it is not included on the NPS's list of National Historic Landmarks (every National Historic Landmark is included on the National Register of Historic Places, but not every place on the register is a designated historic landmark.) I know that the Cathedral website says that the place is a National Historic Landmark, but I think their webmaster might have misunderstood the NPS's designation. I'm removing from the article the WP category of National Historic Landmark. If somebody has more up-to-date information indicating that the designation is correct, they can restore it. Whyaduck 15:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Historic Landmark? 

message: The article was recently moved from a title with a disambiguator seperated by parentheses to one seperated by a comma, with a note that it was done to bring the title to "normal style". I contend that this is not the normal style. Looking at Wikipedia:Disambiguation, I see that the parentheses style of disambiguation is presented as a general style to use, while the comma style is only suggested as a possibility for place-names, with their higher administrative division used to disambiguate. As this article is about a building, not a settlement or other geographic place-name, that style is not supported by policy. In accordance with our policy on disambiguation, I'm moving it back. Gentgeen (talk) 04:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm moving it back. 

message: Rating WP:SFBA importance as mid, as it is a California Historical Landmark, and really could use some attention and work from the task force to improve it.  -- Alvincura (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, i will try to fix up a bit.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: rated sfba importance
Talk:Volatility

message: Volatile most certainly is a band from Covington Lousisiana, but they are not notable 
I think the sentence "Suppose you notice that a market price index which is approximately 10,000 moves about 100 points a day on average. This would constitute a 1% (up or down) daily movement." in the section "Quick & Dirty (Percentage) Volatility Measurement" is slightly incorrect. There seems to be a confusion between standard deviation and mean absolute deviation. 
TW1979 - 8 May 2007 (GMT) 
To do: make a page for chemical volatility. Volatile redirects to this one, but all but one link pointing to it refers to the chemical sense. Securiger 09:25, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that motion. - Diceman 13:06, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:GWR No. 1340 Trojan

message: So, Trojan and Kidwelly form the basis of Percy the Small Engine. Felix — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.145.73 (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wasn't Trojan originally referred to with female pronouns on this page? Because if so, and that's how the engine was referred to in real life, then the page should reflect that. Booger-mike (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was, it shouldn't have been. See WP:GNL. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? Most ships are given female pronouns on Wikipedia! Besides, if Trojan was historically referred to as "she", then the same should apply here. That's all I am saying. But if it wasn't, then I guess not. I'm not claiming to know.  Booger-mike (talk) 23:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because steam locomotives are not ships. We have an explicit exemption for ships, but nothing else. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why though? Booger-mike (talk) 20:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the place to discuss a site-wide guideline. If you want MOS:GNL to be changed, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style and not at the talk page of an article for a single locomotive. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Portuguese Burghers

message: Title should be "Portuguese Burghers" since Sri Lanka has Portuguese Burghers instead of "Portuguese people in Sri Lanka". Do not move to unfamiliar title or talk here. Thanks. --AntanO 03:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, do not try to erase or alter the ethical identity by renaming specific name to common or vague name. There are so much of study about this ethical group. They have own institution for secure their culture, language, etc. It applies to Talk:Dutch Burghers. --AntanO 04:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Your reasons for reverting my edits are very weak. I wish you'd have started a discussion first. You fail to see that I am expanding the capacity of the article. Keeping the articles to just within the scope of "Portuguese Burghers" or "Dutch Burghers" limit them to only the legacy of the Portuguese and Dutch people in Sri Lanka. If we expand the scope then there is no limitations on the article and can include Portuguese and Dutch people in Sri Lanka who are not specifically Burghers. It would be another matter if these articles were highly detailed "Good Articles", but they are not. Renaming them also brings them in line with all other immigrant/diaspora Wiki articles. Also there currently already exists a much more detailed article on Burgher people, while the two articles you have reverted is hardly in any credible condition. There's in no need to repeat articles. Burghers today are not distinguished as Portuguese or Dutch or British etc as they are such a small group and always have been, they call themselves "Burghers". Furthermore I encourage you to google "Portuguese Burghers" and "Portuguese people in Sri Lanka" (and the same with the Dutch) and see which is most common. If you want to help and expand these articles be my guest, but please don't revert my edits without discussion.--Blackknight12 (talk) 14:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You can expand the the capacity of the article while not damaging the title. Who told you that today Burghers are not distinguished as Portuguese or Dutch. If you don't know the different between both groups, you should do research more, and "small group" is not an issue since there are micro level article for place and myth. I don't need to google for finding it. I live in the community rather than search engine. Please stop to erase the comunity identity. It is an encyclopedia, not an ethnic cleansing! --AntanO 14:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Union Navy

message: I created this so that there would be no red links on the American Civil War Menu template. I have relatively little interest in naval matters, so invite swabbies out there to jump in. Hal Jespersen 21:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken up your challenge.PKKloeppel (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I am not at all equipped to provide it but the section indicated could be a lot more informative. Many might be interested in more on the racial composition, sure, but equally the sociology could be made clearer by information on regional origins of sailors, class origins, previous seafaring backgrounds, immigrant versus native born and so on. Given the navy grew from a tiny force to a temporarily huge one, I suspect it was drawing on sources beyond those of the regular navy, and could have been less biased than it toward perhaps denizens of seafaring communities and bringing in others. Comparison to the vastly larger army, which was pulling in significant numbers of all sorts of groups including Irish immigrants, would be of interest. 
This kind of information is commonly of interest when discussing any military or naval service undergoing rapid wartime expansion. The present section is desperately thin. Random noter (talk) 23:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: we have that info on soldiers but less on sailors.  The major scholarly source is  Michael J.  Bennett, Union Jacks: Yankee Sailors in the Civil War. (2004).  It is online at https://www.questia.com/library/120066418/union-jacks-yankee-sailors-in-the-civil-war  which is free to Wiki editors.  There is a bit of info in Ronald S. Coddington, Faces of the Civil War Navies: An Album of Union and Confederate Sailors (2016) which is mostly photos of officers .  On black sailors see : Steven J. Ramold, Slaves, Sailors, Citizens: African Americans in the Union Navy  (2007) .  Rjensen (talk) 23:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More needed on "The Institution" especially "Composition"
Talk:Waltham Cross

message: Hello. Is it OK to change the location picture to the new version (such as the one on Enfield Lock)? Rogwan 21:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think so. Be bold and go ahead :-). Andrew (My talk · World Cup) 00:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, Waltham Cross is just outside Greater London so the map doesn't work Rogwan 14:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location image

message: I don't really see why it is necessary to have a list of bus routes on this page. It doesn't help discribe the locality any better. Does anyone care to argue otherwise? Rogwan 21:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Rogwan. In any case, the bus poster has missed off the weekly Sunday bus to Lakeside :) Seriously though, there are plenty of other pages on Wikipedia which deal adequately with buses. More info on the town, it's history, etc. would be much more notable that a list of bus services IMHO Rushey Platt 17:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed here too - it seems silly to have a list of bus routes here Little Professor 12:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agree - should be briefly summarised in prose. MRSC • Talk 15:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bus routes
Talk:Kentarō Yano

message: http://www.thirteens.net/~ghc/misc/ya/yano.htm lists more books than the article. If I had time I would add them in, but since I don't I'll leave the link here for anyone who wants to to do it. 82.4.36.18 (talk) 14:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kodad

message: Hello, this page is becoming a list of advertisements for local businesses.  If it is to remain a neutral and useful article, we should remove this section of the article.Gruber76 23:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dicuss non-compliance here
Talk:Fitz Remedios Santana de Souza

message: Nice rewrite HJMG -- I moved the page to the subject's full name.  This process created a redirect from the old title.  Cheers!  --nathanbeach 15:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Forgot about page title needing full name. --HJMG 16:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite and Move
Talk:Fouad Twal

message: Ok, I understand that getting a Pallim is a big deal and is very important but Why are we told the exact time that he recieved it?  Maybe it is important to know the time, I don't know and would very much like someone to clear it up for me and other readers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.94.28.195 (talk) 11:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the level of detail with which this is presented gives too much the impression of awe and pomposity. __meco (talk) 13:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Receiving the Pallium