Talk:Tiverton, Devon

message: I operate a web site which I feel is appropriate for the external links section. Under the Wikipedia programme policies, it's encouraged that I don't add the site link myself but instead mention it here and let some neutral party add the link if they see fit. The link is http://tiverton.hotels-and-lodging.co.uk This site is an Open Directory of accommodation providers in Tiverton. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.42.4.145 (talk • contribs). 
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below.  I think I moved all the pages that needed it; please let me know if I missed any.  Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 21:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support.  Clearly there is no primary usage here. Vegaswikian 22:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support.  Clearly there is no primary usage here. Vegaswikian 22:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: #Tiverton in Devon was the original town to have that name.
Tiverton, Rhode Island is NAMED AFTER Tiverton in Devon! Trotboy (talk) 21:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes

message: The Tivoli's reopened & it's now owned by Merlin Cinema87.127.97.148 (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tivoli 

message: Removed the following line from the Tiverton Gazette section:
- "Normally features minor stories about people's meals-on-wheels service etc, another business that has ultimately relocated out of the town."
Aside from being poorly worded the sentence adds nothing to the article and is clearly not appropriate. --Fliptank po (talk) 14:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I am intrigued to know why mention of the TivertonTown.org site has been repeatedly removed. It is a private website that has a great deal of free community info contained; unlike other local sites it is not a large commercial venture. Please take a look at the site and let me know how it differs from other revenue-earning sites which are linked on the Tivi page. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.102.252 (talk) 05:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple. See the criteria at WP:ELNO and you will see that it fails on the very first one. It adds absolutely no value to the article, it is pure spam. --Simple Bob (talk) 08:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community Websites in Tiverton 

message: This article is far too full of uninteresting detail concerning relatively ephemeral recent commercial developments. A lot of it is inappropriate for an encyclopedia article, and it is likely to act as a severe deterrent to anyone thinking of reading all the way to the end. I'd strongly suggest slimming it down very significantly - what will still be worth reading in 25 years' time? Remove anything that doesn't pass that test. C0pernicus (talk) 22:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much information makes for a dull article

message: The information provided about sports teams in Tiverton is insufficient. If anyone is able to name the rugby and cricket teams, this section of the article would be enhanced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.89.206 (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports 

message: There is confusion over what figure should be provided for the population of the town - which is what this article is about.  One problem is that Devon CC's analyses, such as this, cover a far wider area than the town itself - see map on p.3 of the report.  For the purposes of this article, we need a reliable census (or census-derived) figure for the town itself.   The answer, it seems, is 19,544 - as set out in tables accessed from this document, row 3111.  If anyone can find a better way of linking to the (utterly impenetrable - they are not set out in either regional order or alphabetical - you have to do a search, it seems) ONS / NOMIS tables, please do so.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population