lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glenalmond College

message: I have removed the "Coll Slang" section of this article as it unfortunately violates several Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
* Wikipedia:No original research (policy) - The information cannot be referenced or cited from reliable, third party sources, such as newspaper articles or books published by someone other than the school.
* Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (policy)
** Wikipedia is not a dictionary - The list was siply a glossary of terms used by students, or words altered by students to suit their needs, breaking all three points of this section.
** Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought - Point 2 states that original inventions (such as words) are not encyclopedia material until reviwed by a third party publication or source.
You may also want to see the user essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day for further explanation on why this material is not suited for an encyclopedia article on your school, and why it should be excluded, along with elaborations on how the above policies apply.
-- saberwyn 08:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This information is still in violation of Wikipedia's key policy of verifiability, and made-up nonsense is being continually added to it. I suspect most of it has been simply made up. I have removed it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "Coll Slang"

message: Do they still teach English at Coll?
From  - 
prestigious - 
adj 1: having an illustrious reputation; respected; "our esteemed leader"; "a prestigious author" [syn: esteemed, honored] 2: exerting influence by reason of high status or prestige; "a prestigious professor at a prestigious university"Hippo43 13:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prestigious?

message: A long list of alumni, hence the mid importance. You need to give us more encyclopaedic information about your school and cut out the trivia (eg, the chav section). More content and references are needed for B class. Dahliarose 22:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: This seems to lack notability and be of rather fleeting interest. The section already seems dated, and I would suggest its removal. --Breadandcheese (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chav Hunting" 
Talk:Fist of Legend

message: The article lists 3 "mistranslations" in the U.S. release. I just watched the new Dragon Dynasty release, and the English subtitles fix the first two (1. Chen says "I don't know" when asked if he hates the Japanese, and 2. Fumio says the line about the gun and personal development). For the third, Chen states that he's going to be with Mitsuko. Which is the actual correct translation of the original dialogue for the third ? Anyone speak Cantonese? --Fru1tbat (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending subtitles/translation 

message: Just about every sentence of the "Fist of Fury Vs. Fist of Legend" section is original research. It speaks of the camera angles being exactly the same as the original Jingwumen and how Li jumping roping and adopting a more modern style is a nod to Bruce Lee's own training philosophy. All of these statements need to be sourced. And I don't want to hear the "It's understood" argument from anyone replying to my comments. Something being understood is not what Wikipedia is about (unless its something as universal as the Sun is in the sky or humans can't breath under water). If sources are not provided in a week or two, I'm going to delete the entire section. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's understood.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.129.25 (talk) 17:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 
Talk:Laghouat

message: PaintedCarpet (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:The Feeling

message: Is 12 stops & home an international release? Or just UK? Or just Europe? —Preceding unsigned comment added by -Anthony- (talk • contribs) 20:59, 30 May 2006
:It is out in America in July 2006. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmy93211 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 17 June 2006
::Thanks, any news about anywhere else? Australia, Asia, Canada? —Preceding unsigned comment added by -Anthony- (talk • contribs) 21:58, 17 June 2006
:::It's been out in Australia for awhile now, I don't think it's charted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by -Anthony- (talk • contribs) 06:23, 27 October 2006
:::it charted in Holland at 88 i think and in Ireland donno what position , and in poland at 100 i think , released in america for 12 feb this year Bobo6balde66 18:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Twelve Stops and Home

message: Oh VH1's nocturnal state they featured the song "Sewn" but for some reason intead of the label saying that it was The feeling singing Sewn it said it was Pink singing "U + Ur Hand"
Was it perhaps a mistake in the channel or was it perhaps the new name of the band? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 19:56, 3 April 2007 (talk • contribs) 75.74.65.5
:That would just be an error on VH1's part, there's already a rather succesful artist known as Pink with a equally seccesful song called "U + Ur Hand". Glennnnn (talk) 06:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Feeling or Pink?

message: I thought that this was the name of their studio.. at least that's what the blog made it seem like. However, I decided not to edit and ask here first. I remember Dan mentioning that he likes the idea of "going to the moon". Is the album really called "The Moon"? -Anthony- 11:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Moon
Talk:Rosy barb

message: I noticed that this article does not really use the metric system. Most people use the metric system so that is just unacceptable. User:SuperPayara123 talk 01:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use the metric system
Talk:Denison barb

message: I'm moving the text below, which was below the references, to the talk page: Outriggr (talk) 05:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Checker barb

message: The temperature requirements in the Habitat section (68-75 F) differ from those shown in the Aquarium section (75-77F). 204.147.2.12 (talk) 18:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperature requirements
Talk:Colt SCAMP

message: Hey, I see a few contradictions on this page, but I'm not sure if they're wrong. It says the SCAMP was conceived in 1969, but designed in 1971. Alright, fair enough, the idea came before it was designed. Finally, it says in the sidebar it was produced before either date; from 1957 until 1992.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.22.139.89 (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never done this before. 

message: As an abject noob, I have little faith I put this article into wiki style, but I do think I can update it.  Give me a couple of days.  Tychocat 08:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll try this one 

message: Reference no. 1 to "Kitsune'"  is not a valid source of information. The figures given on that source for the effective range for the Colt SCAMP are nonsensical. It is implausible that a small-calibre pistol can have a longer maximum firing range than most anti-materiel rifles.  I suggest removing this source and any references to it: http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm 
Similarly, any information referenced from video game fan sites for real world weaponry should be considered similarly inappropriate.
185.156.172.155 (talk) 15:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate sources 
Talk:Hossam Hassan

message: Has Hossam really scored 80 international goals? The list of all-time goal scorers has him down as scoring 69 in 170.
:According to the RSSSF at the bottom of the page, the number should be 69. I'm going to edit it now.Isaiahcambron 03:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many goals? 

message: According to this (see box on right side) he and his brother have been banned by FIFA for brawling.  Any news on this?  That's pretty major.  Cocytus [»talk«] 13:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banning by FIFA 

message: What is the actual number of official international appearances that Hossam Hassan made and the offical number of goals that he scored for Egypt between 1985 and 2006? The List of footballers with 100 or more caps page currently says 178 appearances, but his actual wiki page says 169, and the list of all-time goal scorers page also says he made 169 appearances (and scored 69 goals). The two FIFA sources on his page (169 appearances; 69 goals) and the RSSSF (178 appearances; 68 goals) source cited on his page appear to be giving conflicting information, and the stats table further down shows a different number altogether (176 appearances; 68 goals). Any help would be appreciated, thanks! Best, Messirulez (talk) 04:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hossam Hassan's International statistics 
Talk:S. Rao Kosaraju

message: Attention all current and potential JHU students: this guy is great. CS majors, if you can possibly swing it, get him as an advisor - despite being extremely smart and accomplished (and probably having grander things to do than counsel undergraduates), he will sit down and really work with you on which classes to take to achieve your goals.
If you're only going to take one second year CS class, take his. His accent is a bit difficult to understand at first, but once you're used to it (give it a week or two), he's a very good lecturer.
(BS in CS, 2002)
I agree with the guy above.  This guy is great.  He's really flexible, and really wants to help you.  If you get a chance, take his class.  The first part is fairly easy, but it gets challenging for everyone towards the end.  Rumor has it that he will not fail anyone and the lowest grade you can get is a C- as long as you attempt the homework and the exams.  Also, you take his oral exam if you're not satisfied with your grade.  If you do better, your grade goes up to the oral exam grade.  If you do worse, you stick with your old grade.
(A Kosaraju worshipping undergraduate)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.224.98 (talk) 02:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aristotelia serrata

message: (discussion meved from User talk:Bogdangiusca)
Why did you move the Wineberry (New Zealand) article to Aristotelia serrata? Is it not more appropriate that the article is listed under its most common name? Alan Liefting 07:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For less known species, instead of disambiguation, it's recommended to use the scientific name. bogdan 08:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But it is well known in New Zealand under that name. There is no official policy on plant names so I feel that the move was not  justified. Alan Liefting 17:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll stick in support for using the sci name here - I know what Aristotelia is as a genus, but to me, 'wineberry' means a species of Rubus. Even in New Zealand, the common naming appears split according to the article, with the Maori name in use as well. More good case for the sci name. - MPF 20:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many common names for plants that bear no relation to the scientific name. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) says the wineberry should be used. Makomako is rarely used so wineberry is a clear choice for the article name. It is time that a plant name guideline in produced. In the interim I am putting categories in the redirect pages for the common names. This makes the categories are readable for the non-specialist. Alan Liefting 09:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: In any case, why "Aristotelia serrata (New Zealand)"?  Isn't the scientific name unique??? --Russ Blau (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it back to Wineberry (New Zealand): it's an English, unambiguous, commonly used name, so there's no reason for it to be here instead. —Nightstallion (?) 09:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific name vs common name
Talk:Royal Moroccan Football Federation

message: The official logo of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation has not crown (). --IM-yb (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake logo 
Talk:National Pledge (Singapore)

message: Earwig was giving >80% match against NHB page so I excised  from five years ago that added significant copy-and-paste content. Restored content to  due to vandalism in intervening edit. That brings similarity down to 60% which isn't great, but the pledge itself of course has to be verbatim in multiple languages so not much can be done about that. Maybe can paraphrase the guidelines a bit but the range of possible wordings is likely rather limited.
Pinging experienced, recently-active SG editors seen in article history  as I'm unsure if it's necessary or a good idea to revdel 90+ edits over a span of five years so I'll defer to someone else on that. Offending range is |start=771803131|end=1095132919 (inclusive of both). – 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Have looked at Earwig report. It should be attributed to the older url address even though it was just a page move as Internet Archive only recorded the URL you had indicated after the revision you indicated. Looking at the diffs between the start of the offending range and when you had removed the content, I don't think there's much to remiss if the 90+ edits is revdel-ed. – robertsky (talk) 21:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

text: @2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 Are the translations considered official? If the pledge is meant to in English, the translations can be removed. -- Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you like to do another DYK, you can expand from the sources at infopedia. -- Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The translations are official. Re: DYK, don't think there's enough material for 5× expansion nor the subject "hooky" enough, so will pass on that. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 03:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Chingford railway station

message: Is there a 'ghost platform' on the forest side of the station?
Is the sentence 'The line no longer towers over the forest, but hides quietly behind the bustle of Station Road, its electric trains now transporting workers into the city rather than helping the masses to escape it.' too poetic for Wikipedia? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I feel that the current connections section is insufficient and perhaps ought to be expanded.  I would suggest "London bus routes 97, 179, 212, 313, 379, 385, 397, 444 serve the station" as a minimum.  This would put in the same style as other London rail stations some of which indeed have a lot more information but would be interested to see what the recommendations on this are. WSmith26997 (talk) 11:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding to "connections"

message: As a small child we sometimes used the Chingford line to get to Epping Forest. I remember that there was an area to the North of the station beyond the platforms that steam locomotives used to run round the trains. This is unusual because normally the lines don't go past the platforms of terminus stations. (This must be a legacy of the original plan to continue the line to High Beech.) I think I saw a turntable and I don't remember seeing locos running bunker first. Okay, this is anecdotal and it happened before 1960 when the line was electrified. Also we normally used the 38 bus to get to the forest so I only saw Chingford Station a couple of times. You can understand my memory is a little hazy. (That is another reason for insisting on properly referenced facts rather than imperfect recollection.) Nevertheless, I'm convinced that Chingford Station had an unusual and interesting track plan.
So far I haven't had much luck in researching this matter. I will continue looking but since I now live in New Zealand it is  difficult. Maybe UK residents (particularly those living in Waltham Forest) could find it easier. OrewaTel (talk) 23:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Layout
Talk:San Bernardino punk riot

message: I've heard a lot of conflicting reports on this event, including that the person stabbed was not a nazi. I'm not really sure since I wasn't there, and even people who were don't all agree. I am having trouble finding much info on the internet though, other than the early news stories. And I never heard that the person died. The Ungovernable Force 09:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed all information that was not sourced in the referenced article.  The 'eyewitness' accounts that keep getting added will keep getting removed because they are not valid sources. --Chuck Sirloin 14:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, if there are more sources, videos included (from a verifiable site, preferably a news site) you can add them. --Chuck Sirloin 17:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced info
Talk:Victor Kugler

message: - I´m sorry for (mis)using this part of article, but the part above is uneditable. Victor Kugler was born in town VRCHLABÍ in what is today the Czech republic! The town was called Hohenelbe in the time when Bohemia was a part of Austro-Hungarian Empire. Is it possible to do it up? Tnanx a lot! lukesey@yahoo.com
:: Thanks for this. The article will be ammended. Yallery Brown 09:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-04-11 Scientology

message: I have blocked Niktchenko for 24 hours due to a 3RR violation on Office of Special Affairs. Since this mediation is taking place on-wiki he will obviously be unable to participate until it expires. --Sam Blanning(talk) 09:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for letting me know. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 23:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notification that [[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] is blocked for 3RR
Talk:Kalka

message: I've included climate table based on the information from the cited source. However, I don't think it is very accurate. I am not sure if we can say that max temperature in Kalka does not reach even 25C. Though, it is difficult to have this kind info as there is no weather station to record or publish this data in Kalka, still if anyone can find any reliable source, it would be good. PLEASE DO NOT MODIFY THIS INFORMATION WITHOUT ANY SOURCE AND BASED ON YOU OWN EXPERIENCE. (It may fall in Wikipedia:NOR policy)
Abhishek Kohli (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please improve Climat info 
Talk:Engineer

message: The vast majority of engineers in the US, most of whom have at least 4-year degrees in engineering, are NOT "professional engineers".  "Professional engineers" are licensed and regulated by the states and this is generally required for only small subsets of jobs that generally deal directly with the public or have significant public safety or public policy implications.  This licensure is not required for the vast majority of working engineers.  I have worked as an engineer for 25+ years and the vast majority of my peers did not need it.
This article is written in a confusing way that spends a lot of time on licensing and regulation instead of what engineers actually perform and accomplish.  Since there is a whole different article titled Regulation and licensure in engineering, we should strip out most of the licensing information and replace it with something like "Some engineering jobs may be required to be licensed in certain countries.  See link" and leave it at that.
 --- this section was left unsigned - Please sign~! SpiralSource (talk) 16:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflation of "engineers" with "professional engineers" 

message: This section is untenable as of now; subsections are pending review. They require adequate sources. Title may be inappropriate. Section may be subject to dilution to other areas of the article, heavy revision, renaming, or deletion. It is unsatisfactory. I will be adding a section citation needed banner. SpiralSource (talk) 16:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Perception

message: Remove image of "a women" for new image that shous the occupation in a better way with two engineers of both sexes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Engineeringlife (talk • contribs) 04:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Image change
Talk:List of lakes of Romania

message: That following terms in the table still need translation:
*acumulare
*alunecare
*glaciar
*nivaţie
*nivaţie şi alunecare
*vulcanic
-- User:Docu
Translated the above terms. (And edited the already present one. Whether artificial (storage) should be kept as a category is a matter of minutiae. Basically, all man-made lakes are supposed to store water at one point or the other). Kyzariel (talk) 00:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Type (translation needed)
Talk:Neo-Babylonian Empire

message: Places Cyaxares, Amytis' father, in the family tree. Mawer10 (talk) 02:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't know if he was Amytis' father or grandfather, which means he can't be accurately placed. He is also normally not considered part of the "Neo-Babylonian dynasty", though he was ancestral to many of its members. Ichthyovenator (talk) 02:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyaxares
Talk:Bract

message: Isn't the Bougainvillea a rather well known example of coloured bracts which are generally mistaken for the flower. If so, we should probably have an illustration. -- Solipsist 10:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Bougainvillea is a good example. JoJan 16:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: The article does not explain at all the difference between a bract and a petal. Isn't that just about the first fact that should be explained? -- Cimon avaro; on a pogostick. 06:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A bract is a modified or specialized leaf, as stated in the first sentence. A petal, on the other hand, is part of a flower.  JoJan 12:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A glaring omission. 

message: Aricle Dendrogramma, which was recently a Wikipedia:Picture_of_the_day refers to bracts in the animal kingdom.  Can this article be expanded to include that sense of the term? (See Talk:Dendrogramma#Clarification of "bract")Christopher Ursich (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add animal sense of term 

message: The article mentions 'modified leaf' or 'specialised leaf'. This is very vague. A leaf is a leaf. The article should just mention something like - bract is a different kind of leaf (aside from the regular leaves) on the plant. KorgBoy (talk) 03:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: How is "..a different kind of leaf.." any better than a "modified leaf". There is no such thing as a "regular leaf". Leaves come in a wide range of shapes, sizes and even colours, and surprise, surprise, this is exactly what the article says, only better. Why not try improving articles yourself, rather than raising abstruse questions on article talk pages? This may seem as verging on trolling.  Velella  Velella Talk   03:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions 

message: see Hydrangea entry: http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=115977 "Flowers fertile or sterile. Sterile flowers few (more numerous in cultivated varieties), sometimes absent, borne at margin of inflorescence"
also Viburnum: http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=134551 "Flowers small, actinomorphic, but sometimes marginal flowers of inflorescence enlarged, somewhat zygomorphic and sterile, rarely entire inflorescence consisting of such sterile flowers; bracts and bracteoles usually small and caducous." Pcrooker (talk) 01:56, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one responded, I'm removing those pictures. Pcrooker (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrangea/Vibrunum opulus pictures show sterile flowers, not bracts 

message: Douche. 2601:280:5B80:7170:798B:87A8:85F3:6B7 (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malts