lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saint Malachy

message: Why is St Malachy somethimes given by some the surname O'Morgain. For the O'Murgain surname is given in set of Armagh genealogies. It is the same pedigree as the O'Muireagain (O'Morgan) who seem to have been a powerful church family in north Armagh...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.177.197 (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: surname

message: I've read that St. Malachi said the this is the last pope (Benedict XVI - Gloria Olivae). It was the Benedictines that added the additional pope because St Benedict said that at the end of the world their order would be in the papacy.
Perhaps the connection to "The Glory of the Olive" is the fact that he choose the name Benedict. 
Follow this; St. Benedict > the Benedictine Order, also known as the Olivetans > Pope Benedict XVI chooses the name of the man who founded the Olivetans > "The Glory of the Olive" thus glorifying St. Benedict the original Olivetan.
:Yipes. Where did we get the idea that the Benedictine Order was ever "known as the Olivetans"? The Olivetans are a very small sub-branch of the Benedictine order: while all Olivetans are Benedictines, very few Benedictines are Olivetans. The order, properly the Order of Our Lady of Mount Olivet, is so small that it doesn't appear to have a website; in 1911 the Catholic Encyclopedia [(http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11244c.htm s.v. "Olivetans")] reported it was down to 10 monasteries totalling 122 monks. It has never been particularly large or influential. At any rate the so‑called prophecies are such a hash that there's very little point titillating ourselves with how the current pope might be shoe-horned into them.... Bill 11:27, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benedict XVI 

message: St Malachias canonized by pope CLEMENTE III - July 6, 1199
Pope CLEMENTE III died on March 27 our April 10, 1191.
Please, do explain...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.244.181.78 (talk) 19:32, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canonized by Pope Clement III.. When? 

message: does apocryphal really mean "of doubtful authenticity"? especially in a religious context? --2607:FEA8:FF01:4B63:6CFD:31B:E9F3:C320 (talk) 12:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  apocryphal
Talk:Marc Miller (game designer)

message: Grammar and punctuation cleanup Kvom01 (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As per WP:ELOFFICIAL the farFuture.net website is the appropriate link.
# The linked content is controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article.
# The linked content primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable.
FarFuture.net meets both of those criteria. It is content controlled by the article subject, and it primarily covers the area for which the subject of the article is notable. WP:ELOFFICIAL is exempt from the normal restrictions on what links can or cannot be linked. Canterbury Tail talk 12:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree because there are items accessed on the site that explain Traveller, the setting and the publications. However I'm willing to leave it as I admit it isn't a lot of content. However Mongoose Publishing and SJ Games are most definitely not appropriate links for the article. Canterbury Tail talk 18:55, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

text: I agree with you that commercial site is only relevant to Traveller entry because it expands and as you say explains Traveller.Jonathan Bland (talk) 19:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Websites
Talk:Aabenraa Municipality

message: Aabenraa is used today as well as "Åbenrå", in fact Aabenraa is the most common? So I don't get why it says in the article that Aabenraa is only used before 1948.
:I am moving this article to "Aabenraa municipality", as that is the official municipality name, and I will be correcting links accordingly.  This is consistent with moving other municipalities into article names that are official.  --SFDan 18:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: This article will be formatted according to the guidelines laid out at Wikipedia:Guide to layout. This is because of many vauge links. As a reader I have a hard time understanding the relevency of some links. Eagle (talk) (desk) 05:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 
Talk:Bald uakari

message: The intro says the uakari is Near Threatened, but the infobox says it's Vulnerable. Which is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.140.142 (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IUCN Status

message: It may be time to split this article. IUCN recognizes and has evalutated the subspecies, and the ASM's MDD lists them all as full species. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:St. Nicholas' Collegiate Church

message: was formerly listed as a good article, but was removed from the listing because It does not meet most criteria for a Good Article - Wikipedia:What is a good article
 
So this is a funny article, it doesn't hardly mention the Church of Ireland, should say when it became a C of I church. No mention either of the iconoclastic damage done to the church. Finally, the doors have been reopened for Catholic services for Parishioners from one of the local parish churchs during a refurbishment. I have no dates or details but hopefully someone who can find these will edit this article. Notjim 11:26, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: {{PAGENAME}} removed from [[Wikipedia:Good articles]]

message: I removed the claim that the church is "the largest medieval parish church in Ireland in continuous use as a place of worship". Apart from not being referenced, this record seems to be qualified by three things (medieval, parish, and continuous-use) which is in my opinion one too many to be notable. I presume there are larger  medieval non-parish churches: some cathedrals of course, and probably churches attached to orders. And larger non-medieval parish churches, e.g. some of the Catholic Dublin suburban churches of 1880-1950. There may be ruined or merely deconsecrated medieval parish churches which are larger. Is there a larger medieval parish church which is in current use but not continuously? Or a larger medieval church in continuous use but no longer a parish church?  jnestorius(talk) 20:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strained record 

message: i can't find any information about malankara or russian communities using the church at all, and relatively minimal information about the romanian community using the church. it seems the romanian mission has moved to the chapel of st mary's college some time after 2019 (this is the newest evidence for the community's presence at st nicholas i could find: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2126419327412171). if anyone has more info about this, please add; for now i have just added a citation needed template.  Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 04:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  use of the church by Orthodox communities
Wikipedia talk:List of encyclopedia topics (77)

message: This is probably a stupid question, but... What is the point of this page!?!?! P Ingerson 11:30, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a list of articles that Wikipedia should have, because they're in other encyclopedias. (Yes, this answer is 22 months late, but what the hell) – Qxz 22:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mai (Chinese surname)

message: This article page is a hoax. Without any reliable reference.
180.214.233.93 (talk) 11:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax
Talk:Chu

message: "Peter Chu, Canadian floor hockey hero, architect and philantropist" There are no sources for Peter Chu, and he is not shown on any major search sites. 
Obama 0wnage (talk) 03:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: People

message: I've seen (but only long ago, in a 1936 UK engineering hand-book) the abbreviation CHU used for a (doubtless now archaic) thermodynamic unit; it's a (short) calorie pound per gram or BTU Kelvin per Rankine; so it's the energy needed to warm one pound of water by one centigrade.  However, I'm unable to find what the abbreviation stood for.  (Obvious guesses include "Caloric Heat Unit", but with no basis for checking.) Eddy 84.215.6.188 (talk) 22:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermodynamic unit 

message: CHU refers to the Christian Historical Union, a now defunct political party. It is not used to refer the the Christian Union, which, when abbreviated, is *always* called CU. 82.176.209.52 (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHU in Dutch politics
Category talk:British actors

message: * we don't place actors in this category, but instead use the English, Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish subcategories — its more informative and stops this category becoming too large (though this won't help the oversized English subcategory).
* Actors in the Asian British and Black British subcats should usually also be placed in a 'country' subcat (as being Asian British doesn't stop you being Welsh).
Jihg 11:44, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
:Per consensus at Category talk:Actors#Categorization of professions by nationality, British actors should continue to be listed in this category, as well as in the appropriate by country and by medium categories. --Lini 03:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That "consensus" was obtained in a rush and goes against the much wider consensus on how to do categorisation. It has been disputed in various places and I regard it as void. Chicheley 09:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two suggestions
Talk:Hui (disambiguation)

message: "Hui (許) is a common family name in Hong Kong." Hui is a surname not just confined to Hong Kong. It is a Chinese surname shared by many Chinese all over the world who have little to do with Hong Kong.--Huaiwei 11:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to expand the article if necessary.  — Instantnood 11:50, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
Whoever made this page into a disambiguation or whoever feels like it needs to fix all the links and double redirects linking to here. --Jiang 08:07, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname
Talk:Tse (surname)

message: There is a proposal to create a precedent that names are not encyclopedic. Articles about names regularly show up on various deletion pages and are summarily deleted. Perhaps - since you've been working on an article about a name, you hold a different opinion that you'd like to express.  Please do: Wikipedia:Deletion policy/names and surnames SchmuckyTheCat 17:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be merged into Xie per naming conventions re pinyin. --Sumple (Talk) 00:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Trompowsky Attack

message: It would be nice to have some edits here on the main lines since I do not play the Trompowsky with White or Black. If I am playing Black and face 1.d4, I make a point of playing 1...e6 in order to avoid all this. I wish someone would answer 1...e6 with 2.Bg5 some day... Sjakkalle 12:01, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Plea

message: The opening is named after Octavio Trompowsky (* 30. November 1897 in Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; † 26. March 1984 in Rio de Janeiro, Brasil). His full name is Octavio Figueira Trompowsky de Almeida. He became champion of Brasil in 1939 after beating Walter Oswaldo Cruz in a match. He twice represented Brasil at the chess olypiad in 1936 and 1939.
Trompowsky regularly played "his" opening in the 1930, 40 and 50ies. His new system became known after he used it in a game against Kiprov at the chess olympiad in Munich 1936.
* It seems that "Trompowski" or "Trompovsky" are popular but nevertheless erroneous spellings of his name.
* one might consider moving this article to the correct spelling of the players' name
* see  for some biographical information
--217.224.47.103 21:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octavio Trompowsky
Talk:Ring of the Fisherman

message: :"During the ceremony of a Papal Coronation or Papal Inauguration, the Dean of the College of Cardinals slips the ring on the third finger of the new Pope's right hand. Upon a papal death, the ring is ceremonially crushed in the presence of other cardinals by the Camerlengo...."
It is not clear (at reading this section) whether or not the "Dean of the College of Cardinals" is also the same "Camerlengo" that crushes the ring. (Keeping in mind that the Dean of the College of Cardinals is also called "Carmerlengo") 
My apologies if I am placing this suggestion in the wrong place.
Jerry.zambrano (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further suggested change 

message: The article says:
:"This custom [of destroying the ring upon the death of the pope] has not been in practice since at least the papacy of Pope John XXIII."
but the only supporting cite is to , which says nothing of the kind.  Furthermore, with respect to the current papal resignation, the Washington Post reports:
:"With speculation swirling around his future role, the Vatican’s  chief spokesman explicitly stated that Benedict will not influence the  election of his successor. And he deepened the sense of finality by  saying that Benedict’s papal ring and other powerful emblems of  authority will be destroyed after his Feb. 28 abdication — just as they  are after a papal death."  
I am deleting this text, and noting that the destruction applies to resignations as well as deaths. TJRC (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Vatican City, Apr 16, 2005 / 12:00 am (CNA).- The Vatican Press Office director denied media reports that the official meetings of the cardinals, known as General Congregations, ended with the discussion of names to succeed Pope John Paul II. . . . During the meeting, Cardinal Camerlengo Eduardo Martinez Somalo destroyed the Fisherman's Ring, which belonged to Pope John Paul II, and the lead seal, as per the Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici gregis, said [Vatican Press Officer Joaquin] Navarro-Valls.  --  
TJRC (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking of ring custom apparently not discontinued 

message: The Pope's bling, showing his popeitude; also known as "The Big Ring."
Personalized per pope since he ain't yo average pimp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.67.99.61 (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real talk 

message: It is unclear if the ring can be inherited from a Pope to its successor or if it is usually broken at the time of death and then a new copy is given to the each Pope.
The latter hypothesis has multiple sources on the web. It is probably due to the fact that each ring takes the Papal name and thus it can't be reused, as it results by the photo editing shown in the current WP article (source: photo).Philosopher81sp (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inheritance
Talk:University of Reading

message: This section needs checking. Sgu03mbt added one list of halls, the universities halls of residence website (see External links) has a slightly different list, which excludes St David's and Mansfield Halls, but include a Whitenights Hall that isn't in Sgu03mbt's list. I've updated the article to include a superset of both, but I'm far from certain about the two that are missing from the University's own list. Can anyone confirm them, and make sure we are not double counting something that has multiple names. -- Chris j wood 12:41, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halls of Residence 

message: Does not meet WP:GNG on its own Rogermx (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bold and merged the one sentence into the student life section, I'm surprised the article lasted this long Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Junction 11 Radio]] 

message: I have restored the link to the Category: Notable Alumni of the University of Reading, which used to be here, but had been deleted or lost.
At one time there were considerably more alumni named here. I would, however, raise two general points for discussion:
(1) what is the point of listing Alumni (or indeed Academics, in the preceding section) here, when they are all listed on the Category page?  The main advantage I can see of listing them on the University page in that some brief description can be given of why they are notable.
(2) if any alumni are to be named on the University page, by what criteria are they to be chosen? 
For example, if current MPs, such as Penny Mordaunt  are to be listed, why not a previous MP, such as Rob Wilson? Can any more experienced Wikipedia editor advise whether there is any general guidance on this? It seems to me that, if some alumni are to be listed, then there is a case for including a greater number than are here at present. The current choice seems quite arbitrary. I cannot, by the way, understand the basis upon which Prof. Hafizu Abubakar and Ibrahim Abdullahi are included if they do not merit Wikipedia entries of their own.Ntmr (talk) 14:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Alumni
Talk:Human mandible

message: This appears to be the only article on a particular bone that specifies it's for the human bone only.  I don't think that's a good distinction to make, the mandible (a.k.a. "dentary") is common to all mammals, and most vertebrates.  I realise that most, if not all, the entries on individual bones are anthropocentric, but I don't see any reason to make them more so.  Suggest the note be removed.
:Most of the article is on the human mandible, as are most of the other articles on bones whether or not they specify this. It's not that this article is only for the human bone but it mostly is because that's where we're at at the moment. The usage of the word "dentary", is, AFAIK, limited to animals (all the doctors and dentists I've spoken to say it's the mandible, not the dentary), so it only deserves a short mention and is certainly not equivalent to the mandible in meaning. Alex.tan 04:42, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhere down the line, someone created a Mandibula article to refer to jaws of vertebrates, while mandible being human.  I have not come across this distinction before (it is puzzling to me).  I redirected the Mandibula article to this one, and agree, the comparative information would be useful.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Human bone

message: Disagree.  There is an entry for each bone of the human body individually.  This is one of the set.  For the same reason, I would not merge fibula with leg or sternum with torso.--King Hildebrand 17:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Jaw]]? 

message: This aticle seems to describe mandible as if it was a term only concerned by human anatomy... Other vertebrates don't have "mandibles" ? and what about insects, like ants or some species of Coleoptera? 343KKT Kintaro (talk) 05:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only human? 

message: Could we have a section here describing which muscles in humans create the basic jaw actions? Muscles of mastication only describes those which move it laterally for grinding. I can't find a list of all muscles which close the jaw and which open it. I think it might be related to front neck flexion. Bonechamber (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muscles 

message: I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
* I feel it is needlessly fragmented to have two separate pages. 
* It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page. 
* Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article. 
* If necessary, this article could be expanded at a later date. LT910001 (talk) 07:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Ossification of mandible]]
Talk:Sturmgeschütz IV

message: Can anyone tell me the conceptual difference between the StuG IV and the Jagdpanzer IV? They seem to have fulfilled the same purpose, built more or less the same way, and having very similar specifications.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nwinther (talk • contribs) 22:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  StuG IV vs. Jagdpanzer IV 

message: I saw a StuG in Helsinki War Museum (Sotamuseo). Is it a IV ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.63.165.5 (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's a StuG III --Denniss (talk) 13:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are other StuG 

message: The text says four but appears to list six. Dabarkey (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number surviving?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-04-04/Proxy list

message: Ow! This article trod on one of my pet peeves:
:In a continuing effort to deter spam on Wikimedia Foundation projects, the developers implemented the SORBS blocklist last Tuesday.
Matthew Sullivan, the operator of SORBS, implemented it (that is, programmed and built it) some time ago. What the Wikimedia developers did last Tuesday, I suspect, was to deploy SORBS' blocklist (by configuring the MediaWiki software to use it). --FOo 13:13, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Implement" vs. "deploy"
Talk:Cheng (surname)

message: Is it possible that the instrument referred to is the sheng?  Pissant 19:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheng is an alternate spelling for zheng (guzheng), a string instrument.  Fixed.  Badagnani 10:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrument 

message: The article needs the Korean and Vietnamese spellings of this name.  Badagnani 10:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Korean, Vietnamese 

message: Hlo babe  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.89.104.24 (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dipesh cheng
Talk:List of distinct cell types in the adult human body

message: The table row 'Known biomarkers' have multiple biomarkers in each entry. 
We coudl sort these alphabetically and then you would be able to sort the row to some degree, but this is still not ideal. 
Does any one have an idear for how to make this row more sortable without making the table bigger? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 07:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table enteries with comma seperated content
Talk:Otway–Rees protocol

message: I wonder if someone can clarify the remark made on the page for Otway-Rees:
"Another problem is that although the server tells B that A used a nonce, B doesn't know if this was a replay of an old message."
The server does not tell B that A used the nonce N_A. What, exactly, is the alleged replay?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.188.192.41 (talk • contribs) 13:49 4 April 2005 (UTC)
That remark is not helpful as it does not give enough detail and does not explain what goes wrong. I intend to delete it and if anyone thinks it is meaningful, perhaps they could replace it with something clearer (preferably with citation if it is from a published source).
Owenrees (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)