lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beylik of Tunis

message: == Ottomon sovereignty ==
At what point was the theoretical vassalage to the Ottomans formally renounced? --Jfruh (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. What is it? A person? A title of honor? A role? A geographic area? A region? A formal place name? I have no idea after reading this article. Benefac (talk) 07:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: At what point was the theoretical vassalage to the Ottomans formally renounced? --Jfruh (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ottomon sovereignty 

message: "Although defeating the Deys in theory, Tunisia continued to be a vassal of the Ottoman empire and the Friday prayer was pronounced in the name of the Ottoman Sultan,..."
Isn't this statement back to front ?  If Husseyn took over effective control of Tunis from Turkish rule,   then he defeated them "de facto"  while continuing the pretence of "de jure" vassalage.    That would not be a theoretical defeat for the Turks.Eregli bob (talk) 03:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct ? 

message: The aricles overlap in many ways. Should not their be a link atleast? --77.169.238.179 (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link or Fusion with the French protectorate of Tunis(ia) 

message: The article explains the history of the Beylik of Tunis, but fails to explain what the Beylik of Tunis is. A definition would be welcome as the first sentence. -- 88.163.168.188 (talk) 07:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. What is it? A person? A title of honor? A role? A geographic area? A region? A formal place name? I have no idea after reading this article. Benefac (talk) 07:06, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: The "Bankruptcy and establishment of protectorate" section at the bottom of the article duplicates the topic of the last subsection of the history section, "Financial crisis and foreign interference (1869–1881)". Even if they're intended to have different scope, the information in the bottom section should belong in the history section anyways; it would be confusing to split it across different parts of the article with other very different sections in between. I tried placing a duplication tag in the section but the wording it generates is a little confusing for this purpose, so I'm just noting it here instead. I'd do it myself but there's a mix of sourced and unsourced material in both sections and it's more than I have time for; hopefully another interested editor could sort it out. R Prazeres (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetitive/duplicate section 

message: Corsair flag of Tunisia resembled the Hamsa in shape and dimensions.
03:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corsair flag
Talk:Bishop Hafey High School

message: There are on-going disputes in the article. Viking1997/192.234.2.25 is making two edits.
One edit repeatedly adds the lyric to the schools alma mater. The lyrics are presumed to be copyrighted in the United States unless we have a credible claim to the contrary (which is unlikely). As a result, we cannot leave this in the article.
A second series of edits adds trivial (and unsourced) details. That the cafetorium has two food service windows, the drama club used the stage, there were parking lots for students and staff, etc. are pointless trivia. Reliable sources do not discuss the  football, soccer and baseball fields is because these are common features of high schools. Including this information is similar to mentioning that Barack Obama has fingernails or that there is air inside the Empire State Building.
I'll let this sit for a bit, then remove it again, failing reasonable discussion to the contrary. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no discussion and my edits were again reverted by an IP without explanation, I have requested semi-protection. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Bishop Carroll High School (Ebensburg, Pennsylvania)

message: This page needs a complete rewrite. It's not wikified at all, and I can tell that it's directly copied from the school website. Alekjds talk 20:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I'm demoting the importance of this article to "low". It's only a high school. Furthermore, it should not be a part of Wikiprojects Catholicism or Pennsylvania. Schools will suffice. Alekjds talk 20:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another note
Talk:The Single Collection

message: Shouldn't this be renamed to something like HIM_The_Single_Collection, e.g. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIM_The_Single_Collection I would change it myself but I cannot find the option.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beautiful so ur (talk • contribs) 20:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title to the page, needs changing?
Talk:St. Gregory's Academy

message: There was a "St Gregory's Academy" which the FSSP ran in Elmhurst, PA, between 1993 and 2012. In response to the FSSP's decision to close the school, some members of the school community decided to found a new school, the "Gregory the Great Academy", which still exists to this day. However, while the current school sees the earlier school as part of its heritage, according to a CNA article, there is no official link between the two. As such, I don't think it is appropriate to make this article about the current school, which is an officially distinct institution. This article is only about the 1993–2012 school. If people want to create a separate article about the current school, they are free to do so. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 04:43, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on scope of article
Talk:Reading Central Catholic High School

message: I'm clueless as to why the name of each valedictorian and salutatorian has a link to their nonexistent article. Usually, red links indicate articles that should be created, but none of the valedictorians fit into the category of needing a Wikipedia article.--Joel amos (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validictorians 

message: I am trying to document the traditions of Reading Central Catholic, so they are not lost as the school was merged with Holy Name to create Berks Catholic.  I created a Wikipedia account about an hour ago, this is my first attempt at editing artiles
 
The amla mater does not have any sourcing, why can that not be entered into the school's article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papalecki (talk • contribs) 03:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that you are a new editor and appreciate) that you are trying to improve the article (in fact, that may be why you have not already been blocked), but you need to pay attention when other editors undo your edits and leave messages on your talk page. Follow the links that have been posted on your page to see what's going on. The link for the Alma Mater undo ( WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI ) was in the edit summary. We don't list the lyrics of school songs because they are of no interest to anyone who is not associated with the school.  Meters (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: sourcing 2 and 3 are duplicates, looks like source 2 should be deemed.  2 and 3 is sourcing for the football stadium.  
thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papalecki (talk • contribs) 13:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed all refs. Please see WP:REF for how to use references. I also suggest that you read WP:RS. Some of the sources you have used would not be considered reliable. Meters (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  help with sourcing
Talk:The Solution (Beanie Sigel album)

message: The sample on "The day" / "Judgment day" (I am not sure of the right title) is from "War pigs", a Black Sabbath song. It is thus not strictly an Ozzy Osbourne sample, even though Ozzy IS the lead singer of the group.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.48.11 (talk) 06:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Stephen Avenue

message: The article currently has 2 copyrighted pictures out of 3 (with the third one being rather uninspired). Does anyone have good pictures of Stephen Avenue and is willing to share? --Qyd 15:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Congratulations, I believe the GNU :Image:Stephen-Ave-Trees-Szmurlo.jpg is much better than the copyrighted :Image:Stephen Avenue.jpg.--Qyd 02:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Connecticut-class battleship

message: I have a couple of concerns regarding the accuracy of the introduction.  For starters, the Connecticut's were not the last US Nacy Pre-dreadnoughts, the two vessels of the Mississippi class hold that particular distinction.  Also, I suspect that the Royal Navy and French Navy might have something to say about that - I seem to remember the Lord Nelson class and Danton class both being described as the "best" Pre-dreadnoughts elsewhere.  Assuming no one objects I'll make a couple of minor edits to the introduction.  Getztashida 15:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate

message: User talk:Kevin Murray/USS Connecticut was begun today. --Kevin Murray (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sanbox for redeveloping this article
Talk:Désiré Defauw

message: Are you certain that it was the Grand Rapids Symphony and not the Gary, Indiana Symphony that Defauw conducted in that period?  He did die in Gary.  He may have conducted both.  They're relatively close.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C202:FB18:D5A9:D22:7A79:6B00 (talk) 18:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manchester, Michigan

message: I don't really see the need for having him on the page. It's really not all that notable in the grand scheme of things, however we shouldn't be adding editorials about it on the main page, we should just remove it. Thoughts? LilDice 15:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, everyone's edits are equal, therefore it's perfectly acceptable for me to edit your edits and vice-versa, that's what makes wikipedia work. Take a look at the WP:POV guidelines, your edit violated this policy, we need to be neutral. Also sign your edits on the talk page like this ~~~~. LilDice 16:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick Davis Inclusion 
Talk:Philip Duffy

message: I have added two sources, both relating to Duffy's radio programme, though neither gives much detail (eg dates and programme name). I cannot find other references to add. I can see that this was PRODed in 2021 and the PROD removed with a comment that sources exist. They may be largely offline sources. Tacyarg (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Heinrich Dusemer

message: This article should be moved to Henry Dusemer. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen.
The preposition "von" can easily be translated with the English "of" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames. Rex 15:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.imperialteutonicorder.com/id4.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:PeopleTools

message: Isn't PeopleTools essentially a proprietary windows-based integrated development environment? Tee Owe 15:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IS PeopleTools an IDE?

message: Full disclosure: I work for Oracle/PeopleTools. Some of the content in this article is outdated (see reference to 2006), and I would like to propose a major edit as follows: leave the first sentence, strike the second and third, and add more recent, relevant content. Here is the proposed content for the page:
 
According to Oracle, the latest version of PeopleTools, PeopleTools 8.50, offers a highly-flexible development environment for customers to manage, customize, integrate and support their PeopleSoft applications. This latest update features an enriched end user experience through the use of new Web 2.0 capabilities, enhanced integration and expanded reporting options. PeopleTools 8.50 is the foundation for PeopleSoft 9.1 applications but is also backward-compatible for older releases, increasing the value of customers’ current versions without requiring an upgrade of their core applications.
 
PeopleTools falls under the Oracle “Applications Unlimited” program. Applications Unlimited is Oracle's plan to continue enhancing its current applications product lines while simultaneously developing its next-generation Fusion Applications. The Applications Unlimited program was created to give customers more visibility into product roadmaps, more choice in determining their future application plans, and more value from their existing application developments.
Are there comments/objections from other editors? DanCPR (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information
Talk:Dietrich von Altenburg

message: This article should be moved to Dietrich of Altenburg. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen.
The preposition "von" can easily be translated with the English "of" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames. Rex 15:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Werner von Orseln

message: This article should be moved to Werner of Orseln. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen.
The preposition "von" can easily be translated with the English "of" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames. Rex 15:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Siegfried von Feuchtwangen

message: This article should be moved to Siegfried of Feuchtwangen. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen.
The preposition "von" can easily be translated with the English "of" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames. Rex 15:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Gottfried von Hohenlohe

message: This article should be moved to Godfrey of Hohenlohe. It is common in English to translate the names of nobility, especially when concerning German names. Hence it's William II instead of Wilhelm II and Albert Frederick, Duke of Prussia instead of Herzog Albrecht Friedrich von Preußen.
The preposition "von" can easily be translated with the English "of" as these are (or originally were) titles, not surnames. Rex 15:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Lager Beer Riot

message: []  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.251.63.246 (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The "Background" section of this article is pure Howard Zinn garbage, it's written in bad English by a non-native speaker, and it repeats information in the main section. It should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.158.121 (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, in addition to the garbled syntax, the rioters were primarily, perhaps exclusively, German. While Irish Chicagoans of the time had their own grievances, this is out of place here.  I'll remove it once I've come up with a better background. Sam Paris (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I enjoyed the new "Consequences" section, the quotes are very useful to the page as a whole.
The Introduction section could use a couple more sentences about the page overall.
I thought adding the "Formation of the Chicago Police Department" section was interesting and much needed. However, I think that it would be better if it were placed after the Background section.
I also deleted part of a sentence in the Background section because of its redundancy and added a sentence in my events section: a quote by Einhorn.
-By jennifer.cerer
I think that the "Formation of the Chicago Police Department" is crucial to the article. This level of importance, however, necessitates that the section is further developed. Moreover, I believe that the introduction could be more developed also. Haassr (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions/Feedback 

message: The section on the police dept. needs some work. The elimination of foreign-born officers did not take place in 1853, but in 1855, under Mayor Boone. The phrasing makes it sound otherwise.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Paris (talk • contribs) 18:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Quite Accurate 

message: — Assignment last updated by Bjurgens14 (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Protest and Police in US History
Template talk:Association football in Northern Ireland

message: There are way too many red links in this template, it's making a mess of the pages it's included on I feel. I propose removing it from all articles until it is improved. Anyone agree? Stu ’Bout ye! 15:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi, I'm re-designing this template to clean it up a little. I'm modelling it on the Football in England template which has league competitions on one side, Cups on the other and National teams and info down the middle. I've added all football competitions at senior level, all the league and most of the cups at intermediate level and the reserve league. Hope it gets the thumbs up. Cheers! DarthJoeyJoJo (talk) 08:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-design
Talk:The Worst (Tech N9ne album)

message: The following text appeared at the top of Tech N9ne's "The Worst" album page.
:The worst is simply defined as soleil poncelet. soleil may be reffered to as "the worst" The worst may be found in her layer in Kelsey, second floor
Since this looks like blatant vandalism to me and had nothing to do with his album I removed it. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism removed 
Talk:Peter Lombard

message: In addition to a number of style edits, I have made a couple of substantive revisions to the discussion of the sentences, based on Knowles' Evolution of Medieval Thought and Copleston's History of Medieval Philosophy -- my sole sources of information on this subject.  According to Knowles, after 1500 Aquinas passed Lombard in the "most-commented-upon" competition.  According to both, Lombard was not an original genius but rather an indefatigable collector, organizer, and evaluator of others' work.
I haven't edited the discussion of his views on charity, but my sources don't suggest that this is the most "famous and controversial" part of the Sentences.  According to Knowles, it was largely ignored by later commentators. According to Copleston, one controversial aspect of the Sentences -- and the subject of an explicit criticism by Roger Bacon -- was that it gave too much prominence to speculative theology and not enough to the scripture itself.  Can somebody with access to more material flesh this out or provide input?
Aldrichio 16:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the 18th January 2007 somebody using IP address 212.219.118.130 feeling in a humorous mood added the words 'on the dole' to the sentence 'Peter Lombard was born in Lumellogno to a poor family'. In the United Kingdom the phrase 'on the dole' is a pejorative expression to refer to someone who is receiving unemployment benefit - what is generically referred to in the US as 'welfare'. The interesting thing is that for over two years nobody appears to have spotted this and all the world has been told in earnestness that the parents of Peter Lombard were 'on the dole'. During that time the article was given a 'B' rating by WikiProject Biography!  13th March 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.10.218 (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Lombard's family on the dole?

message: Currently, the lead paragraph gives c. 1096 to 1164 as his birth and death years. It cites 19th century sources. Most of the authority records attached to the VIAF link give ca. 1100 to 1164. Those sources are chiefly later 20th century. Should the dates be changed in the lead as well as the categories based on the more recent research?--FeanorStar7 11:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates and categories
Talk:Warmonga

message: Look, unless she shows up again, there simply isn't enough information on Warmonga to warrant a page for her.  I say: put her back on the Minor Villains list. Maetch 16:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps I should restate.  Until she comes back and we get more info, Warmonga should stay on the Minor Villain list.  There's just not enough on her at the moment to justify a full page to herself.  On a related note, why does Zorpox (Evil Ron) get his own page when he's a one time only villain?  At the very least, his info should be merged with Ron Stoppable's page. Maetch 17:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Greatest Hits (Thompson Twins album)

message: This is not the first greatest hits album they released after the Greatest Mixes album in 1988.
There was a Greatest Hits album released in 1990 by Stylus Music (the one with the three members of the band sat in the back of a convertible on the cover).  This make #23 on the UK chart and was awarded a Silver Disc for sales of over 60,000 copies.
This article refers to an american compilation released six years later and did not chart at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.153.127 (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong
Talk:Assembly of Captive European Nations

message: Requesting DISAMBIGUATION there is an organization called Anime Central that is referred to as ACEN Anime Central Ishmael Rufus 16:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:To Love Again: The Duets

message: "'To Love Again', which is being released as both a traditional CD and as a DualDisc" ... "All four of these live performances are new and unique fr the audio CD. An extra bonus: 'Flamenco Sketches' features guest saxophonist David Sanborn", according to https://www.sting.com/discography/album/284.--Should any of that be menitioned? 80.67.37.2 (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Flamenco Sketches" (track)