Talk:More4

message: Has the "Adult Entertainment" advertisement actually been confirmed yet? Or are we just using common sense that Channel4 like to be clever with their ads? Nevertheless, Wiki shouldnt work on assumed info. --Hamdev Guru 22:14, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've seen the ad, if that's what you mean.  If you mean "will it be porno", then clearly no - Channel 4 are just being clever, like you said. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 22:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 100% :) After seeing the teaser (not sure if that's the correct term) that's broadcasting on Freeview Channel13 instead of their test screen. I think the ad is most definitely related to More4.--Hamdev Guru 14:08, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

text: The new teaser released today confirms that More4 is the Adult Entertainment Channel. At the start of the teaser it says "More4 the new Adult Entertainment Channel from four." -- Hamdev Guru 17:30, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They're really hamming it up - the trailers feature plenty of silly sex-like gasping sounds. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 17:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

text: And I took it out at 20:15.--Codenamecuckoo 19:10, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks for noticing that. I've replaced it with an equivalent link that still works. Lousy Reuters... -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 20:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Adult Entertainment" ad

message: I removed the paragraph about the Daily Show DOG, but it's been put back in. I don't feel it really has much relevance to an article on the channel - it's just one almost unnoticeable aspect of one show. What do others feel? KeithD (talk) 20:27, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Remove.  This is absurd.   I'm sure lots of other television programs on other channels have been similarly modified.  Morwen - Talk 11:02, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. (Yes, yes, it's only a 'consensus' of two, but people can raise their reasons for it here, and then we can put it back if it is worthwhile). KeithD (talk) 11:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Daily Show DOG paragraph really necessary? 

message: No mention of More4+1 and its close down? --Pongles 10:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a brief mention of it in the "Availability" section. RobWill80 10:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More4+1 

message: :Image:More4logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:More4logo.jpg

message: I don't understand the reference to timeshift in the lead section. What does this mean? EvilRedEye 21:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Timeshift' 

message: It's not More4, but actually 4more, as you can see from their website, and from idents available on youtube. Someone should begin renaming all the links and references when possible. Fry1989 (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the channel's logo does look a little as if it could be read "4 More" but all of the references in the article (such as http://www.channel4.com/programmes/tags/more4), the channel's continuity announcers and all UK tv listings call it More4.Alistair Stevenson (talk) 09:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: WTF? HAPPENED TO THE LOGO, CHANGE IT BACK NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.209.22 (talk) 00:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF????????????????? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on More4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330075948/http://manvsmachine.co.uk/projects/project/more4_rebrand to http://manvsmachine.co.uk/projects/project/more4_rebrand
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330075948/http://manvsmachine.co.uk/projects/project/more4_rebrand to http://manvsmachine.co.uk/projects/project/more4_rebrand
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090824074345/http://www.onastra.com/how-to-receive-astra/index.php to http://www.onastra.com/how-to-receive-astra/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: N 2A02:C7E:576C:C700:E9EE:B32F:BA26:BD04 (talk) 13:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple