lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:What's with Andy?

message: I've prepared an episode list article, and it's ready for upload, just wanted to give a heads up. Any objections? —T-borg (T | C) 20:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of episodes article

message: Should it be mentioned that Andy's last name seems to refer to Ryan Larkin, a well-known Canadian animator?Chinawoman (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ryan Larkin

message: Saban was only involved with the international versions, not the original English release. Pndr (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment of mine is now very out-of-date due to new information, so I've struck it out. Modernponderer (talk) 04:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Saban International revert

message: Broadcast section needs to be sourced.  's edit here introduces more unsourced content, as well as "Middle East", which is neither sourced, nor is it in conformity with WP:TVINTL, which expects inclusion of content about English-speaking nations not wide swaths of not-necessarily-English-speaking geography. Current nations included were culled from List of territorial entities where English is an official language. Adding new content that is neither sourced nor in conformity with MOS:TV guidelines isn't particularly useful. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast 

message: I watched episode "Mind Games" and it is very obvious.Temuera (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should note that Andy's father was The Mystery Prankster
Talk:National Marrow Donor Program

message: This is a work in progress. I hope to add some more sections, including one on the critics of the NMDP (for not recruiting enough minority donors, for one thing).
--Spiff666 16:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice start, Spiff666!  Another useful addition would be a section on other marrow/cord-blood donation registries, e.g. the American Bone Marrow Donor Registry (www.ambdr.org), the specialized registries for people of color, and international registries.  How do they fit into the picture with NMDP?  It's hard for a potential donor to know where to proceed from a search-engine page because so many registries are listed. susato 18:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Spin foam

message: It should be noted that the concept of a spin foam, although not called that, was introduced in the paper "A Step Toward Pregeometry I: Ponzano-Regge Spin Networks and the Origin of Spacetime Structure in Four Dimensions" by Norman J. LaFave (GR-QC 9310036) (1993). In this paper, the concept of creating sandwiches of 4-geometry (and local time scale) from spin networks is described, along with the connection of these spin geometries to form a generalized Feynman path integral connecting the structures between two spin network boundaries. This paper goes beyond much of the later work by showing how 4-geometry is already present in the seemingly three dimensional spin networks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. LaFave (talk • contribs) 16:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been two years, so may we get an update?  Has this gone to a journal yet? – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX )  10:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

text: The comment on the 1993 paper reappeared and today I have removed: not only the paper is not peer reviewed, but it is not even available on the arXiv. – Kecchina  17:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1993 paper 

message: My previous contribution to this page was removed with a note that it wasn't peer reviewed and was not a correct description of spin foams. Although the paper was not published in a journal at the time due to the start of a nw career path, it was reviewed by several researchers in the field and aspects of the paper have appeared in books and papers from other authors since then. Furthermore, although the description differs somewhat in notation and focus from current papers, it is a correct description of a spin foam and conforms to the description given here and in several published papers. Finally, this paper contains "new" properties that advance the field. We are currently working to publish the paper in a journal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.200.93.78 (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been two years, so may we get an update?  Has this gone to a journal yet? – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX )  10:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

text: The comment on the 1993 paper reappeared and today I have removed: not only the paper is not peer reviewed, but it is not even available on the arXiv. – Kecchina  17:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contextual note: 

message: Brief partial entanglements (lasting almost for zero seconds, but the difference-imbalance of their duration among space areas is important for gravity, not their duration) occur naturally in nature among particles and virtual particles and their statistics affect gravity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4108:B200:B09E:4B69:15EF:B358 (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naturally occurring brief partial entanglements
Talk:Multifractal system

message: In my opinion, the article needs to be expanded. A non-technical introduction may be very useful, as well as some external references.
Regarding the mathematical content, the presentation through singularity exponents makes it clearer than its alternatives (moments of partition functions or measures), although some relation to (turbulent) cascade models could be apropriate.
The only problem is an article about singularity exponents doesnt exist Lbertolotti  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbertolotti (talk • contribs) 07:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Comma removed. Alsee (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs expanding

message: In the "Estimation" section, the link to Roberts & Cronin 1996 doesn't work as it should, but I don't know how to fix it.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: When I click on the link, I'm taken to a page that displays the message "Due to a server upgrade in July 2014, this web service is not working at the moment. Contact me by email." So, I regard the link as working, even though it doesn't lead to the work cited; but it looks like something a Wikipedia editor can't fix on their own, unless they can point it to another site. Dhtwiki (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to reference 

message: Here's a somewhat definitional sentence from lead, reformatted with bullets: 
The origin of multifractality in sequential (time series) data has been attributed to 
* mathematical convergence effects 
* related to the central limit theorem 
* that have as foci of convergence 
* the family of statistical distributions known as the Tweedie exponential dispersion models
* as well as the geometric Tweedie models.
That's a bit too much to chew in one mouthful, is it not? — MaxEnt 02:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy sentence exploded
Talk:Ormesby

message: ok, the border here is the Normanby Road, and the railway line.  what precisely north of this is consider Ormesby?  Is the Ormesby Road area what is being identified here?  - does this not conflict with Park End etc?  Morwen - Talk 16:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Boarder

message: The graves of Henry Bolckow and John Vaughan are nor in that cemetery they are in the one on the other side of Stewarts Park User:Darkshownownedthird 16 May 2012
:: No, you're quite right, they're in St Cuthbert's Church, Marton, two miles away to the west. Looks like we should find the text and citation a new home. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bolckow and Vaughan graves

message: The "governance" section redlinks to Morton, Hambldon. This seems like a typo - is Morton, Hambleton what was meant (but where is that?)? Or is the nearby Marton, Middlesbrough what was intended? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 09:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morton
Talk:Braid statistics

message: I regard this article as unnecessary because Braid-Statistics is nothing else than Anyonic-Statistics. Unfortunately I have no Reference for that ... I will fix this as soon as possible. But could anyone tell me what to do then? How do I delete the "Braid-statistics" entry in the "Particle statistics"-Box? Thanks for help.
--MKlaput (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a small "edit" link in the box. Use that.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 07:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary  

message: Is it the same topic, or ? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:34, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Identical particles#The homotopy class]] 

message: I propose to merge Plekton into this page. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Plekton]] into this page
Talk:Roothaan equations

message: Is there a more specific name for this type of eigenvalue problem where the eigenvector coefficients are not in the same basis as the operator? Plediii (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are referring to the operator C on the right hand side of Sx=εCx, that is called a generalized eigenvalue problem (in the linear case, at least). — Steven G. Johnson (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:South Bank, Redcar and Cleveland

message: from inspecting a map the border appears here to flow the a culverted Spencer Beck, with a diversion to include the entirety of the stadium in Redcar & Cleveland - can anyone confirm this?  Morwen - Talk 16:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor called Erimus1066 post the following information
  James Cooper, Sailor HMS Courageous, sunk 17th September 1939
  Anthony Escritt,  Sailor HMS Courageous, sunk 17th September 1939
Unfortunately, it was unreferenced. Perhaps it could be of interest to anyone who could find out some background information. For that reason, I've left it here. Francis Hannaway (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people help 
Talk:Tadpole (physics)

message: No to merging. absurd idea. Ouedbirdwatcher (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag nixed. Discussion at Talk:Quantum electrodynamics#Mergefrom tadpole if we need it. - 2/0 (formerly Eldereft) (cont.) 20:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NO to merger

message: Is it possible that the sentence in the research paper:
::
is a joke?  or (less likely) that they got it from us?  We removed this claim (along with lollypop) just two years ago.  Thanks, —Soap— 20:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think Professor Coleman was simply making a light-hearted joke.  He's obviously not around anymore to confirm either way, but the context suggests to me that he never intended his audience to actually believe that claim. —Soap— 09:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Spermion
Talk:Cutoff (physics)

message: "In auditing, cut-off means correct timliness. Auditors have to ensure whether the transactions are recorded in the correct accounting period. For instance, a sale transaction of the year ended 2007 should be recored in the year ended 2007 instead of the year ended 2006." ---
I have removed this because it has absolutely nothing to do with physics and should not occur on this page. Also the error and grammar makes me question if the person that added this material knows much of the physics of cutoff.
I removed the sentence "UV cutoff is the wavelength at which the solvent absorbance in a 1 cm path length cell is equal to 1 AU (absorbance unit) using water in the reference cell," this not being relevant in quantum field theory. David  16:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some removed entries

message: UV Cuttoff is a term used in development of HPLC methods for different Pharmaceuticals. For choosing the mobile phases and diluent in HPLC UV cuttoff is very useful.
Mahesh Kote.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.249.50.35 (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UV Cuttoff
Talk:Philip-Lorca diCorcia

message: I would like to submit Trunk Archive as an external link. Trunk Archive is an image licensing agency that represents his photography archives. There are links to many online galleries which shows a limited selection of his portfolio. I believe it is valuable and necessary to add Trunk Archive who handles his photos in syndication, and also serves as a more comprehensive gallery to his body of work.
There is a log-in for users that set up an account, but also a general view to the public that requires no log-in at all. This is accessible through the "view archive" link. Thank you.Photoagent (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add External Link 

message: I made a cleanup sweep through the article; most was non-controversial manual of style stuff. However, I particularly want to note that I also removed "and is considered one of the most influential photographers of his generation." This was sourced to a gallery web-site which sells his works; they of course are a non-neutral source of opinion and this is therefore a violation of the Reliable Source policy. I left some asserted facts sourced to the gallery, while not strictly "reliable", they're less questionable. I also removed the agent representation; that's a commercial promotional statement, IMHO. Studerby (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest/Archive 2

message: I have moved this from the guidelines page, where I presume it was placed by mistake (it has already been deleted once). Tyrenius 20:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How?   Most people don't spend their time looking for a random article.  If they stumble upon a vanity article it's typically because they were specifically tryign to look up that topic.  What is wrong with that?  The vanity articles in no way reduce the value of the good articles. Mathiastck 16:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Vanity articles

message: Hey where do I find wiki policy specifically about editing your own companies page?  I work at MySpace now, and would like to participate a little on it's talk page.  I feel like I have to say, but I'm biased, at the end of my sugggestions :)  Where is the policy?  I think Your_company and Wikipedia:Your_company should both link to said policy. Mathiastck 13:05, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your Company 

message: I now harmonized the text with the corresponding policy, while keeping the good advice spirit of it. Harald88 19:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  self citation
Talk:XULRunner

message: A bit more down to earth explanation for people who know nothing about computers would be good. What *is* it? An OS? A program? etc IceHunter 17:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's program which enables certain other kinds ("XUL-based") of programs to run. Kind of like JRE or .NET framework in that respect. --asqueella 22:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what is it 

message: There seems to be a recurring theme / pattern of memory leaks and the like with programs based on XULRunner, including Firefox and the Songbird music app. ActiveState Komodo Edit seems to crash for no reason as well. It would seem there should be a section discussing this aspect of XULRunner within the article. Biturica (talk) 04:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memory Issues (as of late 2009) 

message: Guys, is Firefox 3 going to be using XULRunner or not?  I heard someone on OSNews say that plans to use it were going to be held over until Firefox 4 but I have not heard anyone else comment on this.  I haven't been following Firefox progress very closely over the last year or so.  210.50.56.34 (talk) 10:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Firefox 3?

message: According to the Gentoo bug 403415 xulrunner seems to be deprecated and got removed from the portage tree. Coukd someone with a better background knowledge add some comment on the article page? --79.232.39.156 (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xulrunner deprecated? 

message: ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  XULRunner removed in Firefox 31 / dead? 
Talk:Document retrieval

message: * suggest this be merged with article Information_Retrieval - unknown
* or consider text retrieval Josh Froelich 03:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with other articles

message: The opening paragraph included "The advent of full text searching made the job of the indexer redundant during the 1980s" This is simply wrong, with a full explanation of why shown here http://jalamb.com/full_text_searches/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Proindexer (talk • contribs) 10:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to human indexing 

message: This included
* adding category "Substring indices" from the original article
* adding sections "Form based", "Content based", "Further reading" here, to accomodate
* minimal alterations to the original article text
— CpiralCpiral 20:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged article
Talk:Pittsburgh rare

message: I removed the claim that steaks are prepared in an "oven that has been heated to over 2300 degrees Fahrenheit" because it is dubious.   Pizza ovens are less than 1000 F, and I've never heard of any culinary method operating at higher temperatures than a good pizza oven. Aluminum melts at 1220 F. Iron melts at 2800 F. -- Coneslayer 16:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 2300 degrees is mighty hot. Hot enough to melt glass. I uggest that we chnage it to a vague statement like "very hot" or even "incredibly hot". -Will Beback 01:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, that figure should be verified. I got the number from a waiter at Morton's...his claim was that Morton's can do Pittsburgh rare right because their ovens "get up to 2300 degrees". I'd asked him to get it as black as possible on the outside and as rare as possible in the middle. What came out was just that...a thin crust of char covering an almost completely raw interior. I've tried to get the same effect with common propane blowtorches and culinary torches, which claim temperatures around 2000 degrees and had no success.  The inside is usually cooked by the time the outside gets browned. I've also known glassblowers who have cooked various items (not steak--unfortunately they were vegan) on molten glass, and had similar effects, though I don't know what temperature they had their melt at. At any rate, the number sounds plausible to me but I'll do some digging and see if I can verify it. Aelffin 14:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's beginning to look like a wildly exaggerated claim (or wildly misheard)... This article  says "Most top steakhouses boast custom-designed flame broilers that generate 1,200 to 1,800 degrees of heat. Even the best home grills are lucky to generate half of that." Although if Morton's happens to have a hot shop in the back, it might be possible . Aelffin 15:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've spent a lot of time in a glassblowing studio -- it never occured to me to try putting food into one of the furnaces. But they certainly are in the right temperature range. -Will Beback 19:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incredibly hot oven 

message: The claim that "it is difficult to attain high enough temperature with a common blowtorch" confuses welding torches with propane torches.  A propane torch could not attain those temperatures, but a welding torch could reduce a steak to ash very quickly. I have no idea if this is how the practice originated but I have worked with guys who would try it if they thought of it.  Colin McLarty (talk) 02:04, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welding torch 

message: ok you guys have the same story repeated 3 times in this short article, about steelworkers and furnaces  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:4002:5490:B4D6:CBFE:777:A89E (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  steel
Talk:International America's Cup Class

message: Would be helpful to have at least one photo or diagram of an example of this class. 71.221.118.27 (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustrations

message: Does America's/Americas posessive in this case, or not? If so, then the article should be moved to ?America's? and this page redirected to there.. Madmaxmarchhare 16:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct Name?

message: Although Alinghi won the 2003 America's Cup, it was not a special or spectacular boat. Quite average on the contrary, and this is admitted by the boats skippers, builders, sailer's, managers. Essentially SUI-64 was just a 'good boat' (see Butterworth 2003 Cup statement, New Zealand Herald or TvONE Sports News. It was not a breakthrough boat as America3, NZL-32, NZL-60 and now NZL-92 is. Therefore not awarded status, status denied.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Conner5553 (talk • contribs) 
:Conner: while you've obviously put some effort into your decision, you can't unilaterally approve or deny which yachts are notable or not based on your prejudices. It won the AC, it's notable, if anything, for that. Madmaxmarchhare 13:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alinghi worthy of special IACC boat status hereby denied

message: Unless there are any objections (I'll wait), I'll proceed to move this article to "International America's Cup class" in order to place it under its correct name. Madmaxmarchhare 22:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the move.  No need to wait IMO. —Moondyne 00:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is a redir page blocking the move. Are you an admin that can take care of that? Madmaxmarchhare 21:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  —Moondyne 00:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prepare to move article 

message: I deleted this table from the main page. If everyone wants it, that's ok, but I didn't want the article to turn into a huge list of "official" IACC yachts. Possibly, someone could create a category and populate it with these lists so we could have a "See Also - IACC Yachts" list? Ideas? Madmaxmarchhare 14:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted text -- ideas? 

message: IACC does not redirect here, it doesn't even exist... 132.205.93.63 03:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for creating it. 132.205.93.63 03:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IACC 

message: I don't think this belongs here as the article is about the class of boats themselves. Perhaps it would be better off in a separate page? I don't think it's appropriate for the America's Cup page either as its only applicable to the current regatta. Lisiate 05:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Umpire signalling system

message: If
    DSP: displacement in cubic metres;
    L: rated length in metres;
these are the pure numbers expressing these quantities in the given unit and the result must be compared with 24, not with 24 m.
To my knowledge, the displacement is measured by direct weighting, so DSP is actually weight/seawater_density
pietro151.29.249.152 (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  detail
Talk:Ultraviolet divergence

message: I noticed today that there are separate articles for ultraviolet divergence and UV completion.  Since these are both aspects of the limiting process, and the Yang–Mills theory article mentions the term ultraviolet limit explicitly, I suggest that UV completion be merged with this article, and renamed to ultraviolet limit.  70.250.199.40 (talk) 19:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note also that there is an article about UV fixed point already.  70.250.199.40 (talk) 19:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Although related, these topics are actually opposites. Ultraviolet divergence is about how a particular theory fails at high frequencies; while UV completion is about how any theory (not just this one) might be fixed so that it can handle higher frequencies. JRSpriggs (talk) 19:23, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unify

message: I'm pretty sure "integral" is mis-linked at in the tagline, and that it should be path integral instead. I'm not a physicist, but that seems clearer to me. ◗●◖ falkreon (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagline Clarifications