lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canvasback

message: I removed the reference to shelldrake because I think it was in error.  However, that is only because I couldn't find any references to it being called that.  I could be way off - so if I am, throw it back in there.  Regards, Warren Fish (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shelldrake
Talk:List of Georgia state parks

message: This article and List of Georgia State Parks cover the same subject matter and should be merged.--Tlmclain  | Talk 04:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger suggestion
Talk:Nili Chhatri

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 05:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Electra the Electric Train

message: Ahhh... you might want to mention what this is about. I had to look it up, I'm only partially sure it's from a musical- I almost tagged it as speedy-delete nonsense. You might also want to look it up under the name of the musical, they might describe things there. Cantras 05:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I have done things backwards, I'm afraid - spent an evening collating this information and learning to edit, THEN registered for an account here!  Please forgive my NOOB elementary mistakes in coding - I'll learn.--Belle pullman 00:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Um... what the heck does "AC/DC" mean?76.28.186.172 07:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AC/DC 

message: Just Wondering. Pretty sure this shouldn't be here. "He is also very vain. But then most of the characters are, aren't they?"
I'll keep the vain bit But this is encyclopaedia, not a place to state opinions. I Think At Least. Will someone do me a favour and just confirm this with me? 172.216.16.65 (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Personal opinions do somewhat undermine the facts. Mazz0626 (talk) 14:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinions 

message: When did he play Electra? This article's already so big, understudies really can't be included or that'll be nearly every man who has ever been in the show! Mazz0626 (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, wouldn't you know - 6 months in 1992. Mazz0626 (talk) 11:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greg Ellis?
Talk:Pudding River

message: Gervais and Lucier accompanied by their families as was the custom were trapping on Hons-u-cha-chac which was the Indian name of Pudding river their camp being near its junction with the Willamette while here they experienced Severe weather accompanied with a snow storm which confined them to their lodges until compelled to go forth in search of game The little prairie on Pudding river where the lower Indian trail crossed the stream was but a short distance above their camp Here they came upon a herd of elk some of which they succeeded in shooting The Indian women hearing the firing and suspecting what was going on started with their knives and vessels to assist their liege lords of the chase They succeeded in saving the blood which was soon made into the favorite French dish known as blood pudding upon which with their elk meat they fared sumptuously every day during the continuance of the in clement weather While this memorable feast was being enjoyed Gervais and Lucier christened the stream Riviera au Baudaz n or Pudding River. Should have its own section in addition to the mention in the infobox to include the prior name. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name info to integrate 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/ScienceApologist/Workshop

message: Just in case anyone missed my edit summary: I did not knowingly vandalize the page. I can't explain why history says I did. Art LaPella 05:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was some sort of hardware failure with several of the servers further explained at WP:VPT#Major_edit_glitch Cowman109Talk 05:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hunter Island (Tasmania)

message: I notice this was moved from Hunter Island (North-west Tasmania) to this name - but it is not the only Hunter Island in Tasmania. Well, it wasn't - the other Hunter Island is a former island, in southern Tasmania, at Sullivan's Cove - but it is fairly notable due to its history.  I plan to move it back to a non-ambiguous name, but is Hunter Island (North-west Tasmania) the best name for it?  (see also the Hunter Island disambig page). -- Chuq 05:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: And now it's gone! ozrosco
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozrosco (talk • contribs) 12:35, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unusable information

message: According to this article, Hunter Island is the main island of Hunter Island Group. According to the disambiguation page Fleurieu, Hunter Island is part of Fleurieu Group. Also, there are German and Swedish articles about Fleurieu Group. Which one is correct group? --Vnnen (talk) 21:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Hunter Island Group
Talk:Sringeri Sharadamba Temple

message: My son is 15 years old. I did aksharabhyasa in sringeri 2 times for him. But my son is not at all sitting for study. He is very intelligent.  We put him for hostel in udupi last year withinn one week he ran away from there. He was studying in 9th and got failed. Again we changed his school and now also he is not going to school and cry. His date of birth is 13.09.2008 at 3.40am. Dhanista Nakshatra, Makara rashi. I am very much worried about his future. He not at all interested in studies please guide us. Madhumlth (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: his name is Gagan .P.H Madhumlth (talk) 15:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child education
Talk:Six Schools of Shaivism

message: This article shows forking with the articles for Shaivism and History of Shaivism among others.  Currently it is sourced only by a reference to Subramuniyaswami, a particular guru who has come up on other articles as a WP:FRINGE source.  I think that at least the forking should be reduced by moving duplicate material to the other articles and cleaning up this one to get better sourcing.  The idea of "six schools" is itself debatable, and perhaps the article can eventually be subsumed elsewhere as the cleanup effort on Shaiva articles progresses.  Does anyone object to reducing forking by moving duplicate material? Buddhipriya 06:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forking issues
Talk:Grand Avenue (Phoenix)

message: I disagree with the proposed merge. This is a major arterial with a number of interchanges, recently rebuilt as an expressway in areas. --NE2 13:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then improve the article if you don't want it merged. I thought you'd understand that by now... --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 02:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason this can't be covered by U.S. 60 in AZ. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 19:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason it should be - it's being rebuilt into an expressway, and includes a part that's not US 60. A lot like Central Freeway, eh? --NE2 22:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trika

message: Trika Philosophy is Kashmir Shaivism. ॐ नमःशिवाय Śaiva Sujīt सुजीत ॐ 18:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been thinking about the merge proposal, and at the moment could go either way regarding it.  It is certainly true that Trika is strongly identified with Kashmir Shaivism, and so the proposal to merge has some merits on that basis.  It never caught on as an independent philosphy as far as I have been able to determine, but I am still searching for references that would justify an independent article.  The argument for an independent article may be that Trika philosophy did have some influence in courtly circles independent of pure Kashmir Shaivism and had some impact on orthodox Smarta Brahmanism. (See: Flood (1996), p. 168.)  However these influences are apparently indirect and could be handled in a few sourced sentences. Buddhipriya 18:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge issues
Template talk:US wx radar

message: Military is first because these were the first radars used to spot weather.  They represent the "past", so to speak.
WSR's are next, having evolved from military radars, and they are the "present".
Research radars are last, because many of them are being updated even as we speak - they are the "future".  I didn't include airborne radars, like the ones on NOAA's P-3 aircraft, only because I didn't take the time to do it yet.  Please add these if you are so inclined.
I didn't add the many TV weather radars for two reasons - one, it would make this template long and obtrusive for where I've used it, and two, TV radars don't generally add to the "science" of weather radar - their job is to point out well-known phenomena to the public.
Kd5npf 05:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale of template layout 

message: I noticed several non-existent articles on the template - I'm assuming those are to be created? If not, either I can do so, or those should probably be removed. Seems that this talk page has been hushed for more than a decade...Bryan C. W. (talk) 00:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead articles/non-existent articles
Talk:Baidyanath Temple

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.liveindia.com/jyotirlinga/baidyanath.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  💵Money💵emoji💵💸 13:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Pioneer Valley Performing Arts Charter Public School

message: In response to 79.136.5.149, the only "iffy" part would be emotional significance, which, while likely the section itself is not necessary, it is true that the school is well-known for emphasis on the "community" aspect of the school, and it is accurate to say that students are more attached to the school. However, I think it can be agreed that a lot of the section, in particular "PVPA introduces a new kind of work and school environment, one that promotes trust and understanding, and gives students faith in their fellow students and teachers," "The student body is generally harmonious," and "due to its accepting and almost familial environment." While agreed in the school to be true, these have no place on a neutral article.
76.127.200.194 (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

message: I feel as though the whole article highlights the school as brilliant, enchanting and perfect. As stated below, it is more of an ad for the school than an actual neutral article. Therefore, I felt the need to place the NPOV tag on this article.
--79.136.5.149 (talk) 22:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been removed. Remember to be bold in updating pages!--Wafulz 05:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View
Talk:Black Mesa incident

message: I'm all for deletion of fancruft, or at least merging it, but I don't think it is a candidate for speedy deletion. This needs to be taken to AfD. --tgheretford (talk) 00:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All this information is already covered in Black Mesa Research Facility under "The Black Mesa Incident". This article does not add anything new, so its existence is unnecessary. Also, this article happens to include a lot of nonsense speculation (Casualty estimates? What are these numbers based on?) and some downright incorrect information (The Gene Worm was not in command of Race X, Race X wasn't working with the Nihilanth, etc). MarphyBlack 01:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. There isn't any need for this article. Relevant information from this article (certainly not all of it; most of it seems based on pure fan speculation, at best) should be merged into the Black Mesa Research Facility. Qjuad 01:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree.  In addition this article is quite poor right now in terms of style.  There is an awful lot of repetition.  Not to mention nonsense such as a paragraph which can be summarised as "the following people survived but some of them might not have"....  Thermaland 15:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contest of Speedy Delete
Talk:Wells Fargo Center (Portland, Oregon)

message: I tagged this to get it on the  Oregon WikiProject list in hopes the article can be expanded to include more information about its construction and impact, etc.  --Jgilhousen 05:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged as stub 

message: I'm thinking "Details" instead of location. Its broader and this way it can have the location plus other info. Then I propose removing the old names from the lead and add them to the history section with the years/reasons for the changes. I've found about 10 newspaper articles that should help with that and other expansion. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas 

message: :Reassessment - I find this article of START class quality and have ajusted accordingly.  Nice collaborative work on the details of the center.  Lived in Portland for 15 years and did not know this kind of detail indicated in this article. C. Williams (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged as start
Talk:Camo, Cuneo

message: Note to self, add a link to camouflage as camo is commen slang for it Deuxhero 05:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved to Camo, Cuneo. There is not much discussion if the base term should be redirected to Camouflage but I see a rough consensus to make it DAB. If it should be made a redirect, a fresh discussion on that can be made (closed by non-admin page mover) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Camo →  – Camouflage is the PTOPIC over this obscure frazione. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 16:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 August 2023
Talk:Jody Lynn Nye

message: In section 2 Works, perhaps the "Crossroads Adventure game books" under section 2.1 and section 2.4 Jody Lynn Nye#Others should be combined as "Companion books" or "Series companion books". Perhaps
* 2.1 Series fiction [new heading, no longer inclg the game books]
* 2.2 Series companion books [ = game books and former-2.4 guides ]
* 2.3 Novels [renumbered]
* 2.4 Anthologies (as editor) [renumbered]
* 2.5 ... [no change]
Toward this end I inserted a note to the game books --now the last line of section 2.1-- which explains that the six books fall under the two series (without using the term "companion books" that I have seen elsewhere).
--P64 (talk) 21:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companion books 
Talk:Judson Rosebush

message: It would appear that a robot has identified biographic material *similar* to that posted here; same such robot may find it other places where there is reference to Rosebush, including on postings of other universities, and including Rosebush Company's website www.rosebush.com.
Thus the primary source of this material is Rosebush and Judson Rosebush Company Inc., who are indeed the copyright holders, in whatever event this material is not public fact. It is not possible to research nor get permission from third-party sources who have appropriated these facts and reworked them in various ways. Www.rosebush.com is a natural primary source on the web, and various printed versions of this text have appears on book jackets, introductions, and other print places.
So the issue of appropriation of copyright is moot and the copyright is basically public domain already, even before submission here.
Rosebush 05:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First post

message: Following email sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org hopefully explains copyrights belong to us, and not the ACM or other websites, book jackets, and introductions who print biographical information about Dr. Rosebush:
Judson Rosebush Company Inc., a New York state corporation with an address of 881 Seventh Avenue #1203, New York, NY 10019, hereby states that biographical copy submitted to Wikipedia on the topic "Judson Rosebush" is modified from biographical copy originally published by this Corporation on the website www.rosebush.com and in various printed manifestations.
The website www.rosebush.com continues to bear a copyright notice "© 1995-2006 Judson Rosebush Company Inc." and biographical material similar to that submitted is found on pages such as http://www.rosebush.com/about/rosebush/handp.html. Ergo Judson Rosebush Company Inc. claims full use and privilege of copyright.
Permission is granted to use the copy submitted for the topic "Judson Rosebush" under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
Respectfully,
Judson Rosebush
Judson Rosebush Company Inc.
881 Seventh Avenue #1203
New York, NY 10019
212-581-3000
Rosebush 06:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: --  Drini 19:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: OTRS ticket
Talk:William H. Keith Jr.

message: I removed False Colors from the list of works by William H. Keith since the book's cover erroneously credits him as one of the two authors. False Colors was written by William Forstchen and Andrew Keith (William H. Keith's brother).
See also any of these web pages for the correct credits:
*http://www.baen.com/author_catalog.asp?author=wrforstchen
*http://www.baen.com/chapters/false_p.htm
*http://www.wcnews.com/falsecolors.shtml
Berserker79 (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: False Colors

message: Although Keith served in the Navy during the Vietnam War era, there are no reliable sources found as of yet state that he was in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in the Vietnam War. Accordingly, "Category:United States navy personnel of the Vietnam War" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnam War service
Talk:History of Peshawar

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Peshawar]] 
Talk:Sa'id Akhtar Rizvi

message: Even though this is only a stub, I do not feel that this meets the WP:BIO guidelines for WP:RS on the citations ... they're simply online articles/books that have not been the subject of independent review. Without these dubious references, this stub (untouched for a month) is just WP:OR. 
Also read Talk:Imamate: The Vicegerency of the Prophet to see where this article is part of a house of cards by the author to create a false impression of notability for subjects by using the same "published" source for this and other articles. --72.75.72.174 01:43, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The scholar is notable for publishing multiple books. And books are widely distributed in their entirety on online Shi'a sites. --Striver - talk 18:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Questioning on notability of writer/compiler of more than 30 books (with ISBN Nos) should be reviewed and a flag of Writer and Scholar be honored to him as the writer of any language, region or religion is a writer irrespective branch of science - because science itself is benign and has no language, region or religion.  I have read some of his articles, therefore commenting that he was very good in his research. Nannadeem (talk) 19:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  What exactly does science have to do with this? Not one of the books listed in the article appear to have any scientific value. Writing many books does not make anyone notable. ISBNs are free. Refer instead to WP:AUTHOR.--Anders Feder (talk) 19:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @Anders Feder Thanks.  Science means knowledge/learning, that I mean.  The religion/language is part of social science, besides a subject of communications and ethics.  If you disagree I welcome you. Nannadeem (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, it is a matter of true and false. You can find an index of branches of science here and religion isn't among them.--Anders Feder (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I found in the prescribed list Evolutionary linguistics  For Language  and  Theology for religion.  I am afraid of edit war, so refraining myself from discussion of creating difference between science and scientific approach.  My start is physics and end is in sociology (ultimate return to physics).   I love physics because law of nature is still the same where is sociology is an evolutionary project (including religion and language).Nannadeem (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that list was only created last week, and probably not reliable. Please refer to Outline of science. Religion (and theology) belongs under the humanities, never science.--Anders Feder (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  prod
Talk:Electronic journal

message: (removed article from talk page ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 07:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and why did you do that, and where did you put it? DGG 09:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fret not! It appears that the article content was almost identical to the talk page content at that time. --Trevj (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy up
Talk:Dawat-e-Islami

message: This wiki page is incredibly biased towards this organization. "Undoubtedly, this organization is doing exemplary work and it needs donations.", this is one of many examples that show favor towards Dawat-e-Islami. 62.201.255.71 (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: Hazrat Allama Maulana Abu Bilal Muhammad Ilyas Attar Qadri Razavi Ziaee 72.255.26.234 (talk) 12:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 12:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 April 2024