Talk:CDisplay

message: Isn't it David Ayton not David Dayton? According to cdisplay.net its David Ayton. I'll change it, incase its incorrect just change it back. User:Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.118.121.125 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 3 September 2006
: David Ayton is correct. TheManxome (talk) 06:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ayton v Dayton 

message: The page states that the original author is no longer actively updating the software, but I see no indication of this anywhere on the net. His web page has a release as of Nov, 2006 which wasn't that long ago. Can anyone cite that information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanriot (talk • contribs) 00:03, 24 February 2007
: Latest version is 1.8 released 2004 April. Do you have some other information? 213.197.139.68  —Preceding comment was added at 07:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current website (http://www.cdisplay.me/) states that they believe that David Ayton died in 2003, which is why the software has not been updated since. Mrstonky (talk) 23:43, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: This article seems pretty NPOV to me. The software is out of date and no longer maintained in any case. Was CDisplay the first program to have all those features? It certainly set the standard but if someone could find a reference... TheManxome (talk) 06:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After removing a few more peacock phrases I've de-tagged it. Chris Cunningham (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like an advertisement? 

message: I am Brazilian, and began writing articles for portuguese Wikipedia. My interest area is e-Comics (digital comics), which is most uncovered there.
The portuguese Wikipedia rules states there is no problem on translating articles from other languages (english Wikipedia, for example). But I wouldn't do that without asking first. It might be "authorized" but, without asking, I feel it unpolite.
Why translating and not simply writing from scratch? This text is very clean. Writing a new one could introduce some of the problems you guys and girls here already cleaned up.
If possible, please reply to my talk.
Clayton.Aguiar (talk) 11:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Why no mention of the unofficial CDisplay 1.85.1 update, found at http://www.cdisplay.net/ ? Some of us die-hards consider this to be 'complete', and not requiring further updates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanriot (talk • contribs) 05:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unofficial 1.85.1 Update 

message: Seems the link to David's CDisplay page is dead. Damn. People wanting downloads'll be screwed for a while.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.30.111.246 (talk) 10:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *sigh*, yea i googled it, first few links are to some sites i find kinda sketchy.  -noob1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.32.144 (talk) 01:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not only his personal website, the name reservation for the application's website [] has expired in July this year, too. Just a blunder or EOService for CDisplay?85.182.6.130 (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Found it: http://web.archive.org/web/20071011001044/http://www.geocities.com/davidayton/CDisplay --DBN (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead webpage 

message: Please discuss here why you think it's improtant to add that the CDdisplayEx installer contains adware?
I can't see why this is important.  Thousands of applications include adware, and along with CDdisplaex offer the option of refusing to install it.  Perhaps if CDdisplayEx had its own page where it could be covered in more detail then a mention would be warranted - althoguh even then I doubt it - but given that the coverage is minimal, it's undue weight to mention it in this article.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I note that the CDisplayEx infobox includes the name "Henri Gourvest" and that an involved editor has the username "Hgourvest".  This seems a blatant wp:coi conflict of interest to me, and Hgourvest should remove himself form the discussion (before it even starts).  Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

text: See the reply to your first comment above. - Aoidh (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDDisplayEx commentary 

message: I can appreciate that the Limitations section was probably removed because it violated WP:NOR, but just want to leave a note here linking to it because any user of the app can verify that what was stated in the section was 100% true even if there aren't any sources for the same.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.57.10.233 (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDisplay Limitations 

message: CDislayEx is still under development, with an current, March 2018, attempt at beta for an Android app, per the video on CDisplayEx's YouTube page. Since there is a re-direct to a currently deleted section, at the very least inform the reader with an  to explain the situation. WurmWoodeT 16:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: So what new types of malware have they "updated" it with now? 98.30.43.66 (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-direct to deleted section