lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christ Church (Cambridge, Massachusetts)

message: Per criteria, I have assessed this article as start class.  Broooooooce (talk) 22:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NRHP Assessment
Talk:Sega Studio USA

message: Sonic team has been around for far longer than since 2001.
...uhh. Yeah, I know that. Keep in mind, when I made this article, I said the U.S. branch of Sonic Team. Not the whole Sonic Team. The U.S. branch was actually founded in 1999. They released their first game in 2001.--S200048 (talk) 15:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Merge, There no reason to have so many seperate Sonic Team related articles, when the Sonic article is just a list of games, and the other article contain information!  Doktor  Wilhelm  20:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger to Sonic Team
Talk:Christ Church, Washington Parish

message: Rev. Ethan Allen, who returned to Maryland and became the diocese's first historian, wrote a parish history which is at the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress. However, his handwriting, though neat, is extremely small and I found it difficult to read. I understand that Nan Robertson, a former newspaperwoman, wrote a more recent parish history, but I have not yet been able to obtain or read it, nor do I know when my time restrictions will permit. I was however, told that the original tobacco warehouse building burned to the ground circa 1870, which is considerably after Latrobe's career but consistent with the current building's appearance, which IMHO seems more Federal or Classical revival than gothic.Jweaver28 (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Sacred Heart High School (Yonkers, New York)

message: This is a start on this school article. Further advice is available at the school project page.
1. Add some topics (like history, notable alumni, etc)
2. Keep adding references
3. Add pictures
4. Ask for an assessment at the schools project.EagleFan 22:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: Ok I am looking at this war and I have my opinion on this.  I see no reason why the history section is kept at a high level.  (When it expanded, things like that... however as for "Who approved it"... I don't see any real point to why that would be included in wikipedia.  Also if you want to list the sports, I see precedence for this on other school pages, however I do not agree with (Honor rolls, national Honor society, Library hours of operation??? Really, why would this be in an encyclopedia????  Philosophy of education?? this is "Personal opinion" and I agree not to be included in this.  Again Mission... opinion... " articles like "All students are encouraged to try out for teams of their choosing at Sacred Heart High School. Participation in the athletic program is a privilege granted in return for compliance with their school policies regarding attendance and academic achievement."  This is not necessary.  Discussion about the website... sorry I disagree this all doesn't belong on this page.
So to sum things up... the History of the School "Absolutely" as long as it is high level, expansions, stuff like that.  Even School Teams and a list of sports teams at the school.  The rest I agree is doesn't belong in an encyclopedia.20:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit War
Talk:Reuben Kee

message: His website usually runs out of bandwidth by the end of the month, as people is downloading his songs or just checking what did he do during his lifetime. This is a normal behaviour and should not be added into the article as "website currently down". XGargoyle (talk) 08:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reuben Kee's personal homepage

message: I'm not sure if this is the right place to put this but I'd just like to express my sympathy. You will be missed. -(BrutusCirrus 22:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rest in Peace

message: His actual name is 'Freddie Kee', despite being wrongly reported on the media as 'Frankie Kee'. Please do not change the name back to the wrong one. XGargoyle 09:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reuben's father
Talk:Society of Knights of the Round Table

message: Removed www.arthuriansocietyofknights.org as it was broken.  Left it here as it may be only temporary. - Crosbiesmith 23:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link
Template talk:NJTransit-Main

message: Recent edits removed the travel times, but its not clear why this was done.  Please clarify.  Thanks.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 23:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The second parameter of the routemap templates is meant for distance, not time. See Wikipedia:Route diagram template. Marc Shepherd 15:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absense of distance information, isn't having time information preferable to having no information?  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 18:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sooner or later, an editor will come along and put in the distance information. On top of that, times are dubious anyway. Times can vary quite a bit, depending on the service pattern. Marc Shepherd 00:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Travel times removed?
Talk:KEOS (AM)

message: Did this station actually go dark, or did it continue under a different call sign on AM or FM? If the latter, then it needs to be redirected to whatever the current call sign is. Bearcat 23:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The then KEOS is now KVNA.  Tagged for merge as I noted in WT:WPRS last year.  121a0012 (talk) 01:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to merge radio articles like this before and have been told by administrators that they really can't merge pages with concurrent edit histories. I think I will take the usable portions of this article and incorporate them into the current station article (which is actually the original article). I will then turn this into a redirect to the history section of the original article and make a note on the discussion page about the split edit history. This is about the only way to fix this within the current rules. RobDe68 (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag
Talk:Social dominance theory

message: I have made a start at wikifying this interesting article. This is work in progress by a non-specialist. Comments and additions welcome.--Henri 23:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are still errors in the references. The links to Duckitt and RWA are weak. The article would still benefit from some real expertise!--Henri 19:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: This article covers the racist, oppressive side of Social Dominance Theory. Another use of the term 'social dominance' is when speaking of the animal world, as in the the social dominance of chimpshttp://www.bio.davidson.edu/people/vecase/behavior/Spring2004/cushman/socialdominance.htm hamstershttp://www.ted.com/talks/robert_sapolsky_the_uniqueness_of_humans.html and many other animals, including humans. Therefore, I feel that this page needs to mention this other use of the words, 'social dominance,' and perhaps then, eventually, for another page on the topic of social dominance across many (all?) animal species be created. Thanks. 65.32.176.165 (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  other definitions of 'social dominance' 

message: Related to the merger discussion but logically distinct, as a matter of economy I would suggest that much of the SDT material in the SDO article ought to be replaced with a brief summary and reference to the SDT article. Burressd (talk) 18:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant SDT material in the SDO article 

message: * Study.com says SDT formulated in 1999?!?   This is a bad cite.  Obviously the 1992 paper explicitly described the theory.  My bet is that study.com site typo'd, but in any case it is wrong, and in my upcoming edit I will simply cite Sidanius et al 1992 instead. --J JMesserly (talk) 02:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad citation removed, Need for better criticism section, and other of my recent edits 

message: When looking at new SD material that belongs in Wikipedia, what sort of questions should contributors be asking to determine whether it belongs in the SDO vs SDT article?   My non expert observation is that SDO is a metric used outside the area of SDT research, and by many who are not either not social dominance theory adherents or are not particularly interested in expanding that particular theory.   In response to this instrumentalized use of SDO, my current editing practice is to confine to the SDO article discussion focusing on SDO flavors, methodology, and how it is being used across different sociological and neuroscience studies.  How particular SDO based studies back up particular SDT hypotheses belongs in the SDT article.  If there are objections or refinements to this sort of split, I'd be very much interested to hear them.--J JMesserly (talk) 07:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for deciding if material belongs in SDT vs. SDO article
Talk:Northern Ireland Housing Executive

message: I'm in the process of expanding the article. Things that occur to me that could be covered: the continuing de-facto segregation of housing, peace lines and peace walls, the impact of right to buy and housing associations, the Red Sky scandal, Nelson McCausland's proposal to break the NIHE up. Also some background on what the Northern Ireland Housing Trust was. Sources required. --Nicknack009 (talk) 14:14, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of article
Template talk:The Invincibles squad

message: Does this template need be coloured garish yellow and bright green?  I am colour blind and even I find it garish.  How about a dark green similar to the colour of the baggy green with pale yellow text? -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even swapping the text and background colours has made a difference.  However, feel free to revert if this is unpopular. -- Mattinbgn\talk 23:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Colours

message: I am using Firefox and the flag obscures Keith Johnson's name.  Also, the template lists Johnson as "coach" rather than manager.  Not sure on UK usage of these terms but in Australia these roles are completely separate. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Hi. I'm now using IE and on the template page, it all looks fine and dandy, but on Sid Barnes' page, the players are split into an extra row, with one player on his lonesome. Anyone know how to fix this? --Dweller 11:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:River Worth

message: I saw your recent revert of herons back to lower case. Isn't that the beginning of a sentence? Thanks,   SchreiberBike | ⌨  15:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I realised straight away and reverted it. Dave.Dunford (talk) 10:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization of ''herons''
Talk:Smoking Hills

message: Found some interesting material:
Intense, Natural Pollution Affects Arctic Tundra Vegetation at the Smoking Hills, Canada
B. Freedman; V. Zobens; T. C. Hutchinson; W. I. Gizyn
Ecology, Vol. 71, No. 2. (Apr., 1990), pp. 492-503. 
Abstract: Long-term, natural emissions of sulfur dioxide and acidic aerosols have had an impact on remote tundra at the Smoking Hills. The emissions have caused plant damage by SO"2 toxicity, and have severely acidified soil and freshwater. At the most intensively fumigated locations closest to the sources of emission, pollution stresses have devegetated the terrestrial ecosystem. The first plants that are encountered along a spatial gradient of decreasing pollution stress are Artemisia tilesii and Arctagrostis latifolia, which dominate a characteristic, pollution-tolerant community. Farther away at moderately polluted sites there are mixed communities with floristic elements of both fumigated and reference, unfumigated tundra. This pattern of ecosystem response to a concatenation of stresses caused by natural air and soil pollution is qualitatively similar to the damage that occurs in the vicinity of anthropogenic point sources of air pollution, such as smelters. 
--Saippuakauppias ⇄ 00:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: JSTOR Journal

message: I'd rather put this 70°14'N, 127°10'W as location (shore).
--Saippuakauppias ⇄ 12:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh sure. I just put the other in because it was easy to see at the Atlas of Canada. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: So, is it Coal?  Or oil shale?  Geo Swan (talk) 02:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well according to this it's a combination of "...iron pyrite, sulfur, and bituminous shale...". Paulatuk to the east is the place of coal. Some sort of Bituminous coal. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  interesting... 

message: I wonder whether anyone has looked into extinguishing the fire?  I wonder whether it would be practical to cover the access to the air with a layer of clay?  Presumably it would take a very long time for the orebody to cool off.  Geo Swan (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you could. Look at the picture and the blurb under it. That bit is backed up at the CBC. It appears that it's not a fire as such but smoke as the hills erode. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 19:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  question...
Talk:River Holme

message: TO IMPROVE WIKIPEDIA'S ARTICLE I report this news to integrate: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/river-runs-orange-in-huddersfield-9135854.html to elaborate--Adriano G. V. Esposito (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That media article is neither notable or encyclopaedic enough for inclusion. I have lived at the side of this river for over five decades. Whenever there is a large amount of rain on the hills above Jackson Bridge and Hepworth, around Hepshaw, the build up of water in the old abandoned mine workings at Hepworth Iron Company gets flushed out. The only people amazed by it are new residents further down the valley and the local media they report it to, presumably as it sells more papers. Richard Harvey (talk) 16:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holme turns red
Talk:River Colne, West Yorkshire

message: Thank you for your edits on the River Colne, however you have not provided any comments on your reasons for changing them and thus enable dialogue between fellow editors. I would like to draw your attention to WikiProject Rivers and their guidelines for article structure. There is no need to separate source and course into different sections as the former is intrinsically a part of the other. I will be merging these together again. Your other edits are perfectly good. This particular article has been identified by the Yorkshire Wiki Project as need of clean up which I and others are undertaking as part of work on bringing other geographic articles up to a minimum standard, please feel free to join the effort. I recommend you use the help sections which help you editing.Rimmer1993 (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Clustered NAS

message: A tag has been placed on :Clustered NAS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. 
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material.  To do this, affix the template  to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 
Eyal Traitel 00:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kuhn's-Big K

message: Shadowblade: I created this article because Kuhn's Big-K was already deadlinked at Big K and the chain is mentioned in the articles Discount store and History of Wal-Mart. But, I'm not attached to it so you can delete it if still justified. Olinga 01:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion Tag
Talk:Sea Scouts New Zealand

message: This article is very unsatisfactory. There are no real sources for any of the material except for a very small proportion of the Groups listed. The two sections on individual troops are quite unreferenced and go against the principles that have increasingly been applied to Scouting articles internationally. That principle is that information on individual Groups should not be given unless they are specially notable, such as the oldest or largest. Lists of Groups are also generally discouraged and have been removed from articles, for example, in the UK articles. I am inclined to clean this right back to a stub, but am prepared to see whether NZ editors can improve it. --Bduke  (Discussion) 04:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing and Group information 

message: By merging groups into here and removing list of groups the incentive for groups to contribute has diminished.
I instigated these pages and have done nothing since the mindless interference of dissemination of information, the venturer unit were beginning a project on the history of our group to be placed on the wiki page.  They have given up with that idea and will go to print rather than Wikipedia.  This is a place for innovation not bureaucratic interference.  
Thanks & Goodbye
125.239.232.153 (talk) 04:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Bduke is right. While I can understand an attachment to a local unit, local units almost never meet Wiki's notability criteria. Such articles are invariably deleted. It's better to bring them into an umbrella article that can survive with proper refs. Bduke is correct in that this current article needs vast improvement and the unit articles should be merged into it. — Rlevse • Talk •  15:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Units and groups need to meet the standards per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). See WP:SCOUTMOS. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 17:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: How to discourage contributions
Talk:Ripponden

message: The reference to the Roman Road at Blackstone Edge is no longer reliable. See http://www.archaeologyuk.org/ba/ba120/feat1.shtml in the last paragraph. Original reference awaited from GMAU. AndrewTeal (talk 15:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference to the doubt about the Roman Road is quoted in the page Blackstone Edge. There seems scant evidence for the existence of a Roman settlement in the village, eg http://www.archiuk.com/cgi-bin/web-archi.pl?PlacenameFromPlacenameFinder=Ripponden&CountyFromPlacenameFinder=West%20Yorkshire&distance=10000&ARCHIFormNGRLetter=SE&ARCHIFormNGR_x=03&ARCHIFormNGR_y=19&info2search4=placename_search holds no evidence other than a few coins at some distance. AndrewTeal (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:HMS Collingwood (shore establishment)

message: Where is the base physically located?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.139.48 (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was there in training in 1972, and I looked it up out of curiosity.   Is there a government policy or directive that prohibits the publication of location information for military establishments ?   Darkman101 (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location ?
Talk:No. 138 Expeditionary Air Wing

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:138EAW.jpg, found on :No. 138 Wing RAF, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 15:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Gold mining in Colorado

message: I am working on cleaning up Timeline of mining in Colorado and have a question about the single richest placer gold strike there. If someone sees this and can take a look at it, it would be much appreciated!--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:44, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richest placer gold strike?
Talk:Health care in Calgary

message: Healthcare in Alberta. I plan to start it, since most of the info on this page applies to all of the province, was hoping to use it.  Should we rename this page or just steal the relavant info and create a new one? Kevlar67 (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Healthcare in Alberta 

message: How come there's nothing on the controversial closure of the Calgary General / Bow Valley in 1997?  It wasn't that long ago did you all forget? --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 04:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calgary General / Bow Valley 
Talk:NZX

message: All Wikipedia Visitors should be able to decide whether to use any relevant external links; that decision should not be made for them by other Wikipedia Editors.  I had entered some external links (details below) but they were removed by other Editors without consultation, even though registration is not required and access is Free to the results of detailed Technical Analysis of all the constituents of NZX50 Index.  If you consider that these external links may be of interest to other Visitors, please add them to the ‘article’ page.  
To access the removed external links, click on the ‘history’ tab of ‘article’ page then click to view Revision (236129085) 23:34 3 September 2008 by TechAnalysis.  Scroll to ‘External Links’ section and click on one of the removed links. 
*Technical Analysis of ALL the constituents of New Zealand NZX50 Index - Technical Analysis of ALL the constituents of New Zealand NZX50 Index - New Zealand Stock Exchange
*Technical Charts of selected constituents of New Zealand NZX50 Index - Technical Charts of selected constituents of New Zealand NZX50 Index - New Zealand Stock Exchange
TechAnalysis (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: New Zealand Exchange changed its name to NZX in 2007, the page title should be amended accordingly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.3.11 (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Page titles are usually the full text of an organisation, not it's abbreviation. This is fine. Patchy1Talk To Me! 04:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title

message: The securities commission doesn't exist anymore. Someone who knows about this should really take a look at the regulation portion of this all. In the mean time I'll just take out the bits that are wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.83.202 (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Regulation
Talk:Canada National Parks Act

message: Hi there, 
I'm a masters student studying Geography and am particularly interested in environmental law in Canada. I've been assigned to contribute to an wikipedia article for a course and have chosen to add to the stub article for the National Parks Act. I'll be adding work to my sandbox so please feel free to edit or make suggest changes as I go along.
Thanks!
Claireosanger (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections: History of Act and Implementation
Talk:Rising Sun Flag

message: Please change reference 7 (the last ref in the lead) to:
.At Present it reads  2001:BB6:4713:4858:9C51:93FB:CF8E:ED74 (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . RisingStar (talk) 01:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2022