lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Danjon scale

message: Saying "near mid-totality" sounds vary confusing. I am wondering if other people feel the same way on this.If so, what could we change it to? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dillz42 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mid-totality 
Talk:Subsample

message: Subsampling is also a term used in computer grahpics for creating lower-resolution images from higher ones, or filling in holes in models (e.g. in Point Cloud models). It is related to Resampling. I'm not sure if this is grounds for keeping this page in Wikipedia but I thought it should be mentioned. --Culix 22:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 22:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-03-5 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Intermediate disturbance hypothesis

message: I just wanted to give a heads up that I am planning on expanding this site to include a more detailed intro as well as a few subsections: mechanisms behind IDH, alternative hypotheses for coexistence, testing the IDH and applications for management. Sound good?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Biota007 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 4 March 2007
:Sure, but please be sure to sign your comments, otherwise we don't know who is offering to expand it or when they did so. Richard001 06:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

message: that is used to explain the change in diversity with different levels of disturbance. If you have it please post it...Avram Primack (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs the figure
Talk:The Alliance (The Office)

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 23:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin
Talk:Retribution (2006 film)

message: As I explained here before, the last lines of the film is "私は死んだ。だから、みんなも死んでください", which means "I am dead. So please, I want everyone to die too." But 0zero9nine removed the word "So" again. 0zero9nine, please explain the reason why you removed it. 123.224.225.71 (talk) 11:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last lines
Talk:The Dundies

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 19:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin
Talk:The Frost King

message: According to the Wikipedia Article on Helen Keller, she wrote the Frost King at age 11.  In this article, she wrote it at age 12.  According to "The Story of My Life" by Helen keller (http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/keller/life/life.html), she wrote it the Autumn after she learned to speak.  She learned to speak in Spring of 1890, and was born on June 27, 1880.  By my calculations, she would have been 10 years old in the Autumn of 1890, meaning both articles are wrong about her age.\  Looking for someone else to double-check my math.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smearp (talk • contribs) 17:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correcting Age

message: Some things to fix (for starters):
*The first subsection is titled Official version, but it is not clear what makes this official; I think this needs to be renamed.  
*The first paragraph of this section says that "the following is the explanation provided by Keller and Anne Sullivan to the public...".  It is not clear what paragraphs constitute "the following": the next paragraph? the rest of the section?  This needs to be made clear.  
Doctormatt 23:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I changed these things.  Doctormatt 20:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some things to fix

message: The whole section from "Keller stated that she remembered nothing of this and was devastated that people she had loved and trusted would accuse her of lying" to "This attitude might well have annoyed members of the faculty..." reeks of bias towards Keller and does not have a single citation. I'm rewording it.Terukiyo (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: The controversy needs to be mentioned in the lede, even if only as a single sentence.  It is definitely significant enough that a reader who just comes in to read the basic summary of the topic in the two introductory paragraphs should be made aware of it.
184.66.86.4 (talk) 07:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy should be mentioned in lede 

message: We want Helen keller books for kids 2603:8080:CD09:9F0E:C892:694B:992C:EE01 (talk) 00:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is helen keller
Talk:Boys and Girls (The Office)

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin
Talk:Valentine's Day (The Office)

message: This article really needs some mention of Conan O'Brien's brief appearance, obviously it's pretty noteworthy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs92 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: O'Brien scene
Talk:Michael's Birthday

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin
Talk:Frank B. Woodbury

message: This person was one of the few persons in the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to hold the position of Acting Presiding Patriarch, which was a Church-wide general leadership position. Though his tenure was brief, this is a position of significance to the history of the Church and the article would be of value to anyone researching the history of the Latter Day Saint Presiding Patriarch. SESmith 23:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mabel Keaton Staupers

message: Mabel Keaton Staupers was a significant (notable?) figure in both nursing and American history as an advocate for equal rights and an end to racial segregation in the American nursing profession.
She was inducted into the American Nursing Association (ANA) Hall of Fame. http://nursingworld.org/hof/stauperm.htm 
She is the subject of an audio-visual product available from the National Technical Infomation Service of the U.S. Department of Commerce.  http://www.ntis.gov/search/product.asp?ABBR=AVA08721VNB1
She is referenced in the Encyclopedia Britannica.  http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9002967/Mabel-Keaton-Staupers 
She was also awarded the Spingarn Medal by the NAACP in 1951.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spingarn_Medal 
Other receipients of this award include notables such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., General Colin L. Powell, Oprah Winfrey, Duke Ellington, Jackie Robinson, Alvin Ailey, Maya Angelou, Bill Cosby, Hank Aaron, and others.
These appear to meet the second source criteria and criteria for notability... Lawrence.Levine 23:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Talk:Circle of stars/Talk Archive 1

message: I's just want to say that it wasn't my idea to separate out Circle of stars from Crown of Immortality. But as its now an article with star circles, I can't find any argumentation why NOT to include the EU Flag. The only way I see how we could marginalize it is to let the article dwell in art with circles of stars. --Roberth Edberg 19:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

message: *Keep seperate - That would have been possible before when the article were AfD tagged, but now that article has become explicit to Immortality and can't be merged. --Roberth Edberg 11:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree on the Apocalypse/Virgin parts as there is no source reference to the connection. I will fix that and maintain those in the Circle of stars instead. --Roberth Edberg 13:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Crown of Immortality]]

message: It seems that the article has been affected by fisheater.com spammers. There is no blacklisted link in the article, and still it reports so. It seems to be a known WIkipedia hacking method. As a Newbee here on WikiPedia I need help! --Roberth Edberg 15:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More information about it is documented here: User:JzG/Fisheaters.
* It was in a ref tag, added by Robert I think - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Circle_of_stars&diff=prev&oldid=111825822.  Fixed now. Guy (Help!) 15:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPAMMED: Fisheater.com
Talk:Lethal Weapons of Love and Passion

message: Leathal Weapons is incorrect.  That should be Lethal Weapons.Fconaway 23:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.spcnet.tv/TVB-Series/Lethal-Weapons-of-Love-and-Passion-review-r2231.html#.VbmHyPlViko. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Lucas559 (talk) 02:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Claude-François Ménestrier

message: A worthwhile source for this article would be the secondary work by J. Rock on the ballets at the College of Louis-le-Grand in Paris, where dance was taught as a form of rhetoric; one of Menestrier's original diaries, I believe, is a primary source for that work.Dellaroux (talk) 18:56, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Source Suggestion for inclusion and summarization
Talk:Lac (resin)

message: From the sources I'm finding, the only difference between lac and shellac is that shellac has been refined.  I don't know how I feel about reorganization, but I do feel that so long as shellac is a separate article, this article should only mention shellac in WP:SUMMARY style.  Concerning the lac insect, Banglapedia is a very informative source; I'll try to work it into the article. -Verdatum (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shellac 

message: She would need help on this..anyone? 
ABC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.75.93 (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asha is working on Lac insurance product 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 10:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2024
Talk:CISL (AM)

message: I'm concerned that this article reads an awful lot like a commercial for CISL.  I have added
some statistics and history information, but I'm not sure that the comments about 
CISL's programming and charity efforts are entirely appropriate.  I'm sure that they do
swell work, but is this the venue for blowing their horn??
Danroach 23:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I created the article from a skeleton of that add. I didn't know anything about the station and only remember liking it when I visited Vancouver, but I do agree that those references should be removed.NewYork1956 11:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Fisher

message: I am the creator of this page. Someone hacked this page, removed all the fisher tube photos and replaced with a photo of a band supposedly named the Fisher. I have restored the page. Peterwolfs May 27th, 2013
If anyone has an original photo of a Fisher tube kit, please feel free to add a photo with caption to the gallery. Thanks  "peterwolfs"  March 04, 2007 Peterwolfs 00:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Article needs a source for the assertion that the name is "The Fisher" --Lexein (talk) 19:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Fisher" vs "Fisher" 

message: I propose that Fisher Electronics be merged into The Fisher. I see no reason why they should be listed separately, and the lack of information on both articles regarding their relationship can cause confusion to some. Amp71 (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Vennaskond

message: I have proposed that I Love America be merged into this article. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 15:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Same goes for Millennium (1998 film). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Love America 

message: Vennaskond also have used aliases "The Flowers of the Universe" (https://www.facebook.com/TheFlowersOfTheUniverse/, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC--eetVR4lAWa57x6Qg3DGA) and "The Wild Cats" (https://www.facebook.com/TheWildCatsEntertainment/). While they are sometimes listed as "glam rock", they often play the same tracks as Vennaskond "proper". I've listed both additional aliases in the page - I hope that's OK. --Richlv (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  other aliases
Talk:Kizimkazi Mosque

message: I've found the dating 1007 as well as 1107, here: "according to a preserved kufic inscription". This looks like a simple error, but which one? Hexmaster (talk) 12:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1007 or 1107? 
Talk:Syed Fakhar Imam

message: In 1985 Syed Fakhar Imam caused a stir by defeating Khawaja Safdar, father of Khawaja Asif , the chosen candidate of Chief Martial Law Administrator and President General Zia Ul Haq and Prime Minister Muhammad Khan Junejo for the position of Speaker of the National Assembly.
General Zia launched Khawaja Safdar for the slot and 53 prominent political leaders.
However, Khawaja Safdar after secret balloting got 111 votes, while Fakhar Imam bagged 119 and was elected as speaker.
Two months later, at the conclusion of the Budget debate, Imam stunned the Assembly by holding Martial Law ‘Illegal and without Lawful Authority’ since funds necessary to administer it were not reflected in the Budget. For the first time in Pakistan, martial law had been declared illegal and unconstitutional while it was in place.
However, he is the only Speaker against whom a no-confidence motion proved to be successful.
On May 26th, 1986, Rana Nazir Ahmad moved a no-confidence motion against Fakhar Imam and 152 MNAs polled in its favour with Fakhar Imam managing only 72 votes. Thus, he was removed from the office.
MirooOsama (talk) 09:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  11th Speaker of National Assembly – (March 22, 1985)
Talk:Planorbidae

message: I have translated the text from the Dutch Wikipedia. There may be still some mistakes (language / grammar, etc), but that is up to native British people. The list of genera that I used here was the original English list. I did not check differences between this and that on the Dutch Wikipedia! Inconsistencies between these may be present. Presently I don't have time to do so. I have the feeling that generally these lists are compiled and/or expanded by people who are not very well informed. It is certainly not impossible that invalid names or taxa that should not considered to be a genus are included!
For European data I strongly suggest to use the CLECOM lists as a basis for Wikipedia!
On the Dutch Wikipedia there exist nice templates for references but these don't seem to work here. Therefore, I made a simple list of references here--Tom Meijer 21:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: In June 2012, User:Dysmorodrepanis put a copyedit tag on the article because the layout was so bad he said it made the article almost unusable. I have tried to fix that aspect of the article as best as I can now, and I removed the tag. If anyone else can improve the layout some more, please go ahead! Invertzoo (talk) 00:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout
Talk:Ramez Naam

message: As with Andy Miah, this individual is notable simply because he has written a significant book - in this case, More than Human. What the article needs is some sources showing that the book has received independent discussion in reviews, etc., but I don't imagine that would be very difficult to do. The article probably needs to be rewritten with a quite different emphasis, i.e. on what is notable about him - that he is the author of a non-trivial book. Metamagician3000 00:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That might justify an article on the book, if it is really well reviewed and discussed. if its the only thing he did, then I dont see why the article should be on him, and I dont think 2 articles would be justified. .DGG 05:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The bibliography section give subtitles for the novels:
* Nexus: Mankind gets an upgrade
* Crux: Upgrade in progress
In my copy of Nexus, the "Mankind gets an upgrade" appears only on the cover, not on the title page.  I think it's just a cover blurb, not an actual subtitle.  But someone with a paper copy (mine is an ebook) should double-check, and someone with a copy of Crux should check whether "Upgrade in progress" is a blurb or a true subtitle. --Jim Henry (talk) 04:37, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The alleged subtitles are nowhere mentioned on his webpage.  I'm removing them. Choor monster (talk) 11:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtitles of novels?

message: The books get a bit of attention, but this is still a WP:BLP with zero WP:RSes at all, let alone ones actually about the subject.
Is there any reason not to redirect this to The Nexus Trilogy? A reason would be, for example, good coverage that meets WP:RS of the details of his biography, for example (rather than e.g. cites to two identical copies of his publisher bio).
At present this is a hazardous unsourced BLP, and a redirect to the books would be safer - David Gerard (talk) 08:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. At the moment this article reads like an author marketing bio. Ashmoo (talk) 08:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual notability
Talk:Willie Dennis

message: After having "corrected" Imoya's use of puctuation with inline citations, I've just seen at Wikipedia:Footnotes#Ref_tags_and_punctuation two things that lead me to leave this note here: a) that both versions are acceptable and b) I should have sought consensus here before changing Imoya's chosen version (which, by the way, was also mine until I started editing at Wikipedia) as Imoya was, in fact, the first editor to introduce inline citations for this article. My apologies to Imoya on two counts. --Technopat (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate the constant footnotes--they interrupt the sentences so often it's unreadable. Is there some reason for the copious nonspecific cites from AMG anyway? --ND (talk) 19:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations & punctuation 

message: Hello. On Find a Grave website, there is a William Edward De Berardinis, who was born on January 10, 1921 and died on July 8, 1965, buried in Beverly National Cemetery. On Interment.net, the same one is named William Dennis De Berardinis. He was a musician since he is said AAF Band member. These data are imported from United States Department of Veterans Affairs, could they be wrong on birth year? Or maybe he isn't Willie Dennis? Regards, Xavier 90.13.94.226 (talk) 09:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1926 or 1921?
Talk:Lee Mason

message: I have followed all known conventions in submitting this article - however, please notify me here or here first if you believe it requires modification, or indeed if it is nominated for deletion. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 00:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can we protect this page from the recent edits by "LEE S MASON", who is removing and changing sourced content? Can the user be warned or banned? --TBM10 (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits by "LEE S MASON" 

message: On 11 February 2023, Mason drew criticism after he was appointed as the VAR official in a 1–1 draw between Arsenal and Brentford, where he accidentally forgot to add a crucial line to identify Christian Norgaard, who crossed the ball into Ivan Toney for the equaliser, as offside - therefore awarding the goal to Brentford. (source https://metro.co.uk/2023/02/11/brentford-goal-vs-arsenal-was-given-because-var-forgot-to-draw-offside-lines-18268067/) Asyncyeet (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: this was added by another user GiovanniSidwell (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 February 2023
Talk:Jisk'a Iru Muqu

message: I have failed this article's GA nomination for several reasons. First, while the article is not poorly written, the writing is also difficult to follow at times. For instance, much of the information needs to be more thoroughly explained. The Organization of Space, Ritual Preparation, and Development of Regular Trade Routes sections were all especially difficult to understand. I feel like I would need to have academic archaeological and socialogical education beyond what I currently posses to understand these paragraphs. The article should be written in a way that lay-persons can readily understand it, and I don't feel like it is. Additonally, there were some issues with the passive voice being used and the article would read more smoothly if those issues were eliminated. I specifically noticed the first sentence in the of Regular Trade Routes section as being written in the passive voice.
I also think that the article should have more references and footnotes. Many of the statements in the article seem speculative and should have sources to back them up. With the many reference materials listed at the bottom, it seems like additional cites should be relatively easy to provide. While I would prefer a citation after every sentence, I expect there to at least be one in every paragraph of a good article.
Finally, some parts of the article feel like original research. I don't think they are OR, but because the article appears to have been written largely by someone closely involved with the excavation, the article feels like it is. Senteces like "Excavation revealed differences in the internal organization of space between structures." sound like they came directly out of the research articles that must have been written by the individuals involved. However, since there are many sources listed below, I don't think these things actually are OR. I think that improving the writting and adding additional sources will probably solve the problem of the article feeling like OR.Dekkanar 21:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed Good Article Nomination