Talk:Technique (newspaper)

message: It looks as though the definite article was an historic part of the paper's title, but that this is not true of the current paper. If so, shouldn't the article instead be moved to Technique (newspaper) or something similar? Also, is it really printed in tabloid format? I realize this refers strictly to dimensions and not content, but while I've not held a copy in my hands, it looks like neither a tabloid nor broadsheet, maybe a Berliner or something. Just curious, anyone care to break out a ruler? -Tobogganoggin talk 06:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been thinking about moving the page, yes. And I'm fairly certain that it's considered a tabloid-size newspaper. The image on the article was captured from a PDF, and doesn't necessarily represent the dimensions of the actual paper. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title and format 

message: I have reviewed this article and believe it meets criteria at WP:WIAGA. I think the article is a well referenced and well written piece about a college newspaper. I also think considering it is a school newspaper and not a national publication the article is broad enough for GA class. However to improve especially if considering nominating to FAC then a few parts could do with expanding. Firstly the history section? Perhaps a list of some of the more contentious articles/issues of the past? Or perhaps a list of some (if any) famous contributors from the past, who have now gone on to other things? I have placed a few wikilinks I thought were missing as well. Anyway good job to all those who contributed to improve! LordHarris 10:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA pass

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA sweeps

message: It is clear from the sheer number of broken links to the Technique website from various articles on Wikipedia (numbering over a hundred) that some major sea change has happened there.  No media web site for a public institution would break links on its website en masse like this unless it was done intentionally to distance itself from past reporting.  The breakage coincided in time with the loss of the famous "Two Bits", as we read here, as well.  There is nothing in this article to indicate what sort of conservative takeover led to this.  It should explain something.  Please add it.
-130.207.229.86 (talk) 11:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Two Bits was discontinued because all of the writers graduated, and didn't recruit anyone to replace them. The website was broken because they redesigned it and weren't bothered to include the archives. You can still access all of the Technique content through the Georgia Tech Library here, but I haven't had the time to go through and update all of the links. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 13:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

text: And while we're talking about media sites breaking links, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is particularly notorious about that; articles from just a few years ago have rarely been accessible, much less the kind of age I'd need for the research I focus on around here. So at least we have the Georgia Tech Library to archive the GT student publications for us. :3 —Disavian (talk/contribs) 13:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links to Technique website 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on The Technique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414153020/http://www.nique.net/pdf/ads/adsbrochure.pdf to http://www.nique.net/pdf/ads/adsbrochure.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cyberbuzz.gatech.edu/anak/history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on The Technique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070114085637/http://www.nique.net/issues/2002-08-23/news/1 to http://www.nique.net/issues/2002-08-23/news/1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090217182639/http://studentpress.org/acp/winners/npm04.html to http://www.studentpress.org/acp/winners/npm04.html
*Added  tag to http://video.library.gatech.edu/cgi-bin/Griffin/griffin.pl?showpic=GP569&lastpicnum=570&search=&fieldtype=key&dispic=yes
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520122536/http://smartech.gatech.edu/dspace/bitstream/1853/12810/5/technique_v1i1.pdf to http://smartech.gatech.edu/dspace/bitstream/1853/12810/5/technique_v1i1.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070112101030/http://www.nique.net/staffmanual/intro-administration.pdf to http://www.nique.net/staffmanual/intro-administration.pdf
*Added  tag to http://video.library.gatech.edu/cgi-bin/Griffin/griffin.pl?showpic=GP593&lastpicnum=20&search=technique&fieldtype=key&dispic=yes
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607192007/http://www.nique.net/issues/2002-01-18/opinions/2 to http://www.nique.net/issues/2002-01-18/opinions/2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220083300/http://www.sga.gatech.edu/files/Budget_2006-2007.xls to http://www.sga.gatech.edu/files/Budget_2006-2007.xls
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929133313/http://nique.net/issues/2007-02-09/news/5 to http://nique.net/issues/2007-02-09/news/5
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929141132/http://www.nique.net/issues/2005-02-18/opinions/3 to http://www.nique.net/issues/2005-02-18/opinions/3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified