lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Voiced retroflex implosive

message: Isn't this the "tutting" sound people make to express disappointment? — ciphergoth 13:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's a dental click. kwami 01:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tutting 

message: Both the page on IPA and this page state that the Unicode symbol is not "explicitly recognized" by the IPA, but is supported in the Unicode Phonetics Extension Supplement. Should the phrasing be "not officially recognized"? Explicit recognition doesn't make sense in this situation. If the phrasing should be changed, let me know and I can change it on both pages. Thanks. — Jclu (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Explicitly recognized?" 

message: "a D with a tail for retroflex and a hook-top for implosive": very unclear.  First, it can't be a 'D', it should be a 'd'; second, afaict there is no "hook top" in Unicode.  So how do you write this in Unicode? Mcswell (talk) 23:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't answer your question, but the symbol has got its own article – D with hook and tail – which gives a tiny bit more context. – Uanfala 23:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicode description
Talk:On Heroes and Tombs

message: Sobre translate better to About, it should be About Heroes and Tombs, if no one has any objection one week from today, i `ll change it. Zidane tribal (talk) 04:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  On Heroes and tumbs is the title of the English translation, so you should take your complaint to the publishers of the English version of the book.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.206 (talk) 22:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the book 

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata
Talk:Wolfgang Köhler

message: No mention of Kohler's other activities while on Tenerife?  Like his covert work for the German government during WWI?
Didn't he do a lot more?
:Obviously the article can be expanded, that's why it's tagged as a stub.  Re the espionage stuff, my general sense is that the evidence is substantial but not totally airtight.  However, I haven't really studied it.  The allegations were considered sensational when they first came out.  See: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1927565 (the article is also in JSTOR) for a cite to Ley's book and some discussion that took place afterwards.  Found by google search that gets 27,900 hits. 67.117.130.181 01:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Bouba/kiki effect cites Kohler as the creator of the experiment. There is no mention of it here. Kingturtle (talk) 13:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bouba/kiki effect 

message: The article says, "they had experienced an insight (also sometimes known as an “aha experience”)". This isn't Oprah; if a reader doesn't know what an insight is, he can follow the link. No need for childish vocabulary. Boldly deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iain.dalton (talk • contribs) 20:52, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary condescension 

message: "dismissal of Karl Planck, a well-known experimental physicist"
Um.... is this supposed to be Max Plank, mentioned in the paragraph before? Ehgarrick (talk) 01:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Max was a theoretical physicist.96.248.101.32 (talk) 00:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   Karl Planck
Talk:Propaganda in the United States

message: I removed some entries from :Category:United States government propaganda organizations and tagged some for citations needed. Overall there are many organizations there that are not run by USA (but are NGOs), and others which have just been criticized by some as being propagandist, but WP:UNDUE is an issue. More eyes to monitor this would be nice. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Propaganda in the United States/Archive 1#This Article is a Piece of Wimpy Crap, meaning one does not have to be on the payroll of the US government in order to do "US propaganda". CNN, MSNBC, Fox, ABC, PBS, etc., make propaganda without being financed by the government. Samsung and Apple do very effective propaganda, albeit most often it is not political propaganda. tgeorgescu (talk)  20:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category cleanup 

message: Which weeks? Xx236 (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  a six-weeks period alone 

message: Does it not belong here?Xx236 (talk) 10:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In the International section. int21h (talk · contribs · email) 16:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

text: I have replaced 'Radio Liberty'. Now references and facts are needed.Xx236 (talk) 06:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty]] ?
Template talk:Left Behind

message: Isn't this template largely useless, as the majority of links redirect back to the Left Behind (series) page? -- SamSim 20:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as eventually they won't and will redirect to a separate page for each book. Some do already. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  21:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Apollyon (novel)

message: This is the first time I've tried to add to a talk page, but I found the grammar in this page to be poor to the point of incomprehensibility.  I might have taken a stab at editing to correct, but at some points it is confusing enough that 'correction' might actually be changing the intended meaning.
Changing tenses, possessions and sentence structure all distract the reader from the content and the message of this author.
I've been reading wikipedia for years and this is easily the sloppiest entry I have seen to date!  
(I've never consumed any of the left-behind media, so I can't comment on the content of this page itself...)
14:17, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof-reading 

message: At the risk of sounding dense, why does the synopsis of a novel need to cite "references and sources"? Silver Shiney (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   References and sources
Talk:FIFA Street (2005 video game)

message: 'Although generally regarded as entertaining and fun...' sounds like someone's trying to make it not seem as bad as the rest of this sentence makes out. POV? I haven't played the game very much, but I think so. - Nova Prime 13:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Aight this is it zidane aint in da fifa street game only in da fifa street 2!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.110.140 (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zidane aint in da fifa street 1 game
Talk:Spies (novel)

message: Perhaps it's not surprising since the book is a school text that nobody likes, but this page seems to be coming in for more than it's fair share of vandalism.  RobbieG 13:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Since when?!?  The source given says nothing of the sort!  RobbieG 14:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-semitic 

message: According to the end of the book: 
# Stephen and his family left Germany in 1935.
# Geoff was 6 years old when his family left Germany.
# Geoff is 4 years older than Stephen.
Therefore, if Stephen was 2 years old in 1935, he must be 7 in 1940 and 12 in 1945.
Assuming that this was the summer of 1944, Stephen would have been 11 years old.
Thanks for reading
maybe put this into the article
92.236.101.113 (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen's Age
Talk:Heckmondwike Grammar School

message: It has come to the senior management of HGS' attention that highly inappropriate and frequent vandalism is taking place on this page, caused by a minority of students. In addition, as a result Google has cached a vandalised version of this page.
They have asked me to investigate options. I am investigating whether I can get anonymous editing of the page disallowed temporarily.
Please refrain from vandalizing the page and defaming the school (surely you have better things to do!).
SuperCoolAl 10:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequent Vandalism 

message: A request for protection has been placed in WP:RFP. Cowman109Talk 19:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Protection 

message: Surely there are more notable alumni than that ?
I mean there's me for a start !
78.32.193.115 (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni
Talk:Water park

message: The park depicted is actually "Slide n'Splash" in the Algarve, Portugal. You can see (part of) its name above the red and white sun umbrella and a bit in its right too. In the umbrella it's even written "A origem do café", which is a portuguese slogan to a brand of coffee meaning "the origin of the coffee". And last, I've been there lots of times and recognize the park.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.196.32.31 (talk) 23:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Watermania, Cyprus

message: Check out: Waterpark Directory   They contain a searchable list of waterparks from around the US with links to each and misc info about them.  Easy to use and lots of 'em.  14:54, 4 July 2006 User:66.190.44.43 (Talk) (Comprehensive list of US Waterparks) 
:I attached this as an external link to list of waterparks. -- Sadi Carnot 15:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comprehensive list of US Waterparks 

message: Some one please fix the vandalism in the indoor waterpark section. There is no such thing as Noah's Boat Waterpark (most likley parody of Noah's Ark) and the Kalahari in Sandusky is America's largest indoor waterpark, not the hotel in Honoloulu  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.102.34 (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Please list the biggest 10, this may be noteworthy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulldecent (talk • contribs) 15:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest 

message: Checking online dictionaries and publications, the term "water park" is almost always cited as two words as opposed to one.  I am considering changing this and wasn't sure if there were past discussions on the subject (I didn't see any).  If there are any objections, please post them here.  Thanks!  GoneIn60 (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support the move. Themeparkgc  Talk  22:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Water park versus waterpark

message: The History section is more an explanation and trivia section than any form of history. Could this be fixed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.44.173 (talk) 22:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section isn't  

message: This article seems highly US-centric, while there is a vibrant market of water parks elsewhere - in particular Italy. What can we do?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.44.173 (talk) 22:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-US Parks 
Talk:Spring Snow

message: Unless someone objects, I'm going to delete the sections "References to other works" because the information provided is not shown to be significant to the story. Douggers (talk) 02:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to other works 

message: I am reading the novel and just encountered this term. It appears to only be mentioned on Wikipedia in connection to the article on this novel. I have also had a very hard time finding any information about what it might be from a cursory Google search. Does someone who knows want to add the info as a parenthetical to this article's mention of it, or even write an article about it, or add it to the article on Japanese festivals?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BinkyChottyboats (talk • contribs) 05:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Omiyasama festival
Talk:Combat box

message: If anyone has access to pictures of planes in formations or diagrams of them, please feel free to add to this article. I haven't yet found any public domain diagrams.--Buckboard 14:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just added a reference to the 398th Bomb Group Combat Formations - if I can get to it I'll make new illustrations for this article based on this info brain 14:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: In the Top View of the Formation Diagram in the upper right hand corner there appears to be an error with the labeling of the High and Low Groups. Vertically the groups ascend in height to the right. Thus Low is on the Left, Lead is higher, and High to the Right is higher. See 398th Bomb Group Combat Formations. I hesitate to make changes to this complex diagram. If you would like to discuss, please contact the webmaster at 398th Bomb Group via the address link in lower left hand corner. DaveJ08 (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams
Talk:The Autobiography of a Flea

message: Does anyone have or can anyone find a digital copy of this that can be posted to Wikisource.  It's been public domain for 30 years, and I can't find a free copy anywhere.  I'm happy to do the posting if needed.--LostCause1979 (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Copy
Talk:The Indiscreet Jewels

message: should this really be classified as simply an erotic novel? it could also be classified as philosophical or under XVIII-century French Literature.--ponyboy 14:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:A Painted House

message: I removed "violence-prone" from the description of Cowboy, because of the contrast with the description of Hank Spruill, who is not described as "violence-prone". 
Yet Hank, like Cowboy, also killed someone. 
Either both should be described as violence-prone, or other ways should be found to write about them. 
I question the reference to Cowboy's nationality in this context as well. Why is it important to label Cowboy, but not Hank? 
If it is important that Cowboy be seen as a violent "Mexican", Hank should by the same token be described as a violent "American" (or "Anglo").
Finally, I am not sure whether the description of Cowboy coincides with Grisham's intentions. Grisham does not shirk from ascribing violence to Cowboy, but still chooses to frame his story in terms of the affection between Cowboy and Tally Spruill, and of the opportunity to escape that Cowboy represents for her. This adds a softer dimension to Cowboy's character which is completely missing from Hank's. DocDee (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjusted statements to reflect NPOV 

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:A Painted House.JPG, found on :A Painted House, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Tropic of Cancer (novel)

message: I think this article has moved passed the Stub Class and should be considered for reassessment. Sure, it's not a featured article, but it's definitely better than stub. Does anyone else agree? QuidProQuo23 16:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just; the references clinch the change. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 18:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality reassessment 

message: The references cited in the Critical reception section are enough to justify at least an high importance assessment.--Sum (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance assessment 

message: is that reference page? The lead looks awkward like that. Enigmamsg 05:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  rp? 

message: I've added  to the top of this talk page, due to the article's discussion of censorship attempts throughout its history. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 17:51, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like this addition is also supported by , thank you, — Cirt (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added WikiProject Freedom of speech 
Talk:A Spy in the House of Love

message: The setting is not in France but apparently, though little definite information is given, New York.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 19:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Background
Talk:The Mad Man

message: I don't understand the statement that "Brodkey's article began with some scientifically preposterous statements about contracting the syndrome. Only slightly revised, and just as preposterous, Brodkey's article was reprinted as a book . . ."  The entry does not say what is scientifically preposterous in Brodkey's opening passage, unless it is his claim that he contracted AIDS despite not having had gay sex since 1977.
Brodkey's claim may or may not be true, but is it "scientifically preposterous"?
Gregory Feeley (talk) 22:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spoilt Bastard

message: The main article is a bit "fan written", isn't it?  I was surprised by the length of the entry (phnarr phnarr! - sorry), and then found out why: people have been listing personal favourite episodes, and doing so in a rather poorly written manner.  Some trimming is perhaps necessary to keep things encyclopedic?  Guv2006 (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many additions?
Talk:Kachhi District

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: wahaj Rizwan is a YouTuber (age:17)(born in:August 31 2006)(father: Rizwan ur Rehman KHAN)and graphic designer.He start his journey of YouTube in January 13 2023.his full name is Wahaj ur Rehman KHAN.his YouTube videos about VFX, graphic designing and videos editing and earning platforms, vlog and food etc. Wahajrizwan (talk) 14:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wahaj Rizwan
Talk:Chagai District

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070921184228/http://chaghi.sitesled.com/Topography%20of%20Chaghi.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 00:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The Chilgai link in the list leads to an article about a place in Tajikistan, not in Pakistan.Redav (talk) 23:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chilgai-link leads to article about place in Tajikistan
Talk:Transport 21

message: I think that some maps would be relevant. Maybe one of the upgraded road network, one of the new rail network and one of the Greater Dublin Area showing the metro, extended DART, Luas and motorways/dual carriageways. Jvlm.123 15:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have tagged as future product as until major contracts are signed and implemented their is no telling how far the project will progress. Perhaps a section entitled "current status" would be approporiate? Djegan 15:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged: future product

message: I have adding  and fact to many parts of this article , in 1 week from now i will removed anything that isnt cited. (Gnevin 13:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unferenced

message: Trans5999 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Gnevin (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Rail Elements of the plan are covered... 
Talk:Kalat District

message: The article sites
:According to the census of 1995, 89% of the population speak the Brahui language and 10% the Balochi language; presumably, this refers to the proportions of the population that name the said language as their native tongue.
Shouldn't the main language in the sidebar reflect this? Jmldalton (talk) 00:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Language
Talk:Still Life with Woodpecker

message: Removed caption from pic stating it to be the first edition cover... if you look close, it mentions Fierce Invalids Home from Hot Climates at the top, which wouldn't be released for 20 years. Cannot possibly be the first edition. -- Antepenultimate 16:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Aside from suggesting that this long list of quotes be moved to Wikiquote, what is the possible justification for calling them "Popular quotes"? I've never heard of any of them and, frankly, I've never been consciously aware of anyone quoting Still Life with Woodpecker... --Midnightdreary 00:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes? 

message: The title of the article is Still Life with Woodpecker with a lower-case "w" on "with", but the article spells it as Still Life With Woodpecker with a capital "w" on "with". Which is it? 199.120.30.199 (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My printed book has the title only in all caps - both on front and back covers and internally. There's no lowercase at all. So to be accurate it should be ALL CAPS, but I think Still Life With Woodpecker is slightly better. peterl (talk) 15:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  'With' or 'with'