lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elizabeth Hamilton, 1st Baroness Hamilton of Hameldon

message: I have changed the entry to show her Ducal title by marriage as she was at no time known by her own barony so to list her only under that is peverseAlci12 11:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Below are a few links that indicate the possibility that Eliazbeth was more commonly known by her maiden name: 
* Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. XXIII
**Not evidence. It was DNB editorial policy to list all peers by surname, and there is no question that she was better known as Elizabeth Gunning (which was  her formal name when she was a belle) than as Elizabeth Campbell (which never was; the Duke of Argyll survived her. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You have no evidence, however, that the names of the pictures are contemporary, and the Gavin Hamilton one cannot be: it was (according to the page linked) painted before her first marriage; if your article is correct, before she met her first husband; nor can the Reynolds, which was painted before her second marriage, and gives her both titles. In both cases, surely, they are named by the gallery. The fundamental problem is that she was Elizabeth Gunning, she was Duchess of Hamilton, and she was Duchess of Argyll, and she is still known by all three. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Wow! Thanks for the link to the discusson about Lady Byron. The incredible amount of research and communication dedicated towards getting things right or as close to right as possible is wonderful. Daytrivia (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, not that much; I have a decent library to hand, and was willing to look at four books to find out. But the point here is: what is the best of the several choices here? I'm really not sure. The paintings are worth considering because they are present usage of how to make clear who she is. Unfortunately, we have managed to talk ourselves out such forms as Elizabeth, Duchess of Hamilton, which may be ambiguous anyway. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maiden name  
Talk:Myeongdong Cathedral

message: I was just searching for the location of Myeongdon Cathedral, and I wonder if the current information is really correct. I see on both Open Street Map and Google Street Map that it is located north of City Hall.
I search with Myeongdon Cathedral's address in Google Map, it shows up at a quite 
distant site, north of Myeongdon station. (I see that address in multiple sites such as Virtual Tourist, Jung-gu Culture & Tourism site, Trip Advisor, & The official web site.) And you can see some other sites showing the same location on the map: The Seoul Guide, and Visit Seoul.
I am not knowledgeable enough about geocoordinate issues, but The Seoul Guide site shows a set of coordinates.
Tomos (talk) 16:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. The coordinates that were in the article were actually those of Seoul Anglican Cathedral, not those of Myeongdong Cathedral. I've emended the coordinates accordingly. Deor (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Deor for quick responce. Tomos (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinate error

message: The article states that a submission was made to Leo XIII in 1826. He did not become Pope for another 50 years! Mooloolaba15 (talk) 21:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pope Leo XIII 

message: The article's ok, but it needs more sources. Too many unsourced claims; I suspect people keep adding them in stealthily. toobigtokale (talk) 02:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs more sources 

message: This is an attempt to communicate with the IP who is edit-warring over the addition of unsourced additions. This is the place to discuss those proposed additions in order to seek consensus for which additions, if any, should be included.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for discussion
Talk:Veneti (Gaul)

message: Really? They ended? That's funny because they reemerge like daisies in spring time the second roman power started waning. Julius Caesar did very little to change regional boundaries or politics in ancient Gaul. He merely made it absolutely clear that their loyalties were to him. The Veneti may have been dissolved as a politically confederated entity but its clear that after a probationary period of excess taxation and military levying the status quo was restored.
—
I'm surprised that Caesar himself isn't cited for the retribution he delivered to the Veneti for kidnapping and chaining high ranking Romans.  He specifically mentions the retribution he inflicted on them and why, which is more detail than he delivers on many tribes he dealt with during the Gallic Wars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.165.231.45 (talk) 21:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "The End of the Veneti"

message: Noting that one part of this article used BCE, I changed all other dates in this article from BC to BCE.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.88.146.64 (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating System
Talk:Beopjusa

message: If anyone knows how to add the coordinates to the page, they are 36,32,32 north; 127,50,01 east.122.38.247.25 (talk) 21:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Hwaeomsa

message: The total disregard of a “private” conversation between a monk and one of their esteem guest is appalling. Writing an article about what was said within the trust of a low key discussion is terrible. Shame on those who encourage this behavior and on that monk who felt entitled. Gossiping is never okay and apparently they had nothing better to do with their time. 66.27.161.10 (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Disrespectful Behavior Towards Privacy
Talk:Storer Communications

message: WTVG-TV Channel 68 was a Newark, New Jersey station which was owned by KKR not the one in Toledo, Ohio. WTVG was previously known as WBTB-TV owned by Blonder-Tongue-Broadcasting which sold the station to Wometco Enterprises which changed the call letters to WTVG when KKR purchased Wometco a few years down the road sold it's Wometco broadcast properties and the station again changed it's name and at present WTVG is actively used else where, I presume in Toledo, Ohio. They call me Mr. Pibb 08:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WTVG

message: Francis P. Murphy agreed in principle to sell WMUR-TV (channel 9) in Manchester, New Hampshire to Storer in early 1957, but it came under fire when it announced plans to move that station's transmitter to just outside Haverhill, Massachusetts – only 20 miles north of Boston, with it soon becoming apparent that Storer intended to move all of channel 9's operations across the border to Massachusetts and reorient it as the Boston market's third VHF station but outcry from New Hampshire viewers led regulators to reject Storer's request to build a new tower near Haverhill, and Storer subsequently backed out of the deal. Had Storer's request been approved, it would have possibly made channel 9 a CBS affiliate due to its very good relations with that network (and given Boston VHF channels 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9), and it also would have potentially resulted in WNAC-TV (channel 7, the predecessor to the current WHDH) becoming a full-time ABC affiliate, and the original WHDH-TV (channel 5, now occupied by WCVB-TV) signing on as an independent station. 64222368Z260O (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed purchase of WMUR-TV channel 9 in 1957
Talk:Burmee Colony

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 02:55, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade
Talk:Moutohora Island

message: The Maori name seems to be spelled in two ways - Motuhora & Moutohora.  Both come up in Google.  Are both right, or is one a common mis-spelling?
GrahamBould 12:10, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The NZ place names database says it's Moutohora Island. Speaking of which, this is now the official name, not Whale Island. I'll move the article to the official name (Moutohora Island) next week, and make Whale Island, New Zealand redirect to this, unless someone objects. -- Avenue (talk) 12:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Im not sure that really counts. it's a bit of a stretch for me.
I'd like to suggest that it be deleted. discuss.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.101.156 (talk) 11:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "In popular culture" sections often end up populated with essentially trivial information. This generally seems harmless enough to me, and I usually leave them alone unless they get too long. But if you want to remove it, I won't object. I haven't found any real life consequences of the Quidditch team on the island from a couple of Google searches. --Avenue (talk) 08:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in popular culture -> Moutohora Macaws -> Quidditch -> Harry Potter???
Talk:Seong Han Myeong

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#
====Survey - in opposition to the move====
#Oppose.  What inconsistency?  Gene Nygaard 17:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Oppose.  What inconsistency?  Gene Nygaard 17:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move

message: :Add any additional comments:
::And what do you mean by "redirects were messed up".  Maybe that is something that should be addressed whether or not the article itself is moved, but what's wrong?  Double-redirects—not much trouble to fix them.  Copy and paste move problems and associated page history problems?  A better explanation of what you are talking about would help.  Gene Nygaard 17:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
Please do not move this page back - there is nothing "anti-korean' about making all Soul Calibur characters' articles match. There has been a discussion on this to name article titles after their most common name - and Han Myong's first name is not mentioned enough in the games. He is announced as simply Han Myong throughout the series. Mr.bonus 14:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Clifton, Karachi

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 10:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: Most of the stuff in this article is against WP:OR. It should be properly referenced as per WP:V,WP:RS otherwise anyone can remove unsourced material.-Civilizededucationtalk 17:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR 
Talk:Gadani

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade

message: Since when Gandi is part of India?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Khalidkhoso (talk • contribs) 05:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps someone confused Gand(h)i with Gaddani :-) Pahari Sahib 07:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since when Gandi is part of India?? 
Talk:Keilor Plains railway station

message: This section has been removed from the page
It has been said work may be carried out in mid 2006 in order to underground the road at the Taylors Road crossing just meters away from the platforms. If however, work was to be done the Sydenham Line trains will decrease it's services to Watergardens (Sydenham). Most trains will then termiate at St Albans.
''
as it is completely based on hearsay evidence and is totally unverifiable. Who said this? When did they say it?  Not to mention the spelling and grammar.
--Anothermelbournite 12:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsurprisingly this was added by an anon editor, so don't expect any answers any time soon.  :-) --ozzmosis 13:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iloveoov

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Vaticidalprophet 08:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Choi Yeon-sung →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Last move rationale was speculative, at best, and the support vote "more encyclopedic" is not a policy. 
*Google search results for "Choi Yeon-sung" starcraft: 3,030 results
*Google search results for iloveoov starcraft: 27,100 results.
In regards to news articles:
*Google news search results for "Choi Yeon-sung" starcraft: 2 results
*Google news search results for iloveoov starcraft: 248 results. Pbrks (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 May 2021
Talk:Reach (gamer)

message: In order to meet wikipedia's biography standard (WP:BIO), this article needs to cite  reliable sources which can  verify the subject's  notability. Unsourced material may be removed, in accordance with Wikipedia policy. --Bfigura (talk) 03:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Park Jung-suk (gamer) →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. He is not "well known as real name now" and "more encyclopaedic" is not a reason to bypass a policy. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 February 2022
Talk:Hee-seop Choi

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 01:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Jim Tracy reportedly said that he did not start Choi on one particular day because Adam Eaton was pitching, and Eaton has a unique arm angle in his pitching delivery.  Gprobins (talk) 15:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference needed?
Talk:Yuna Kim

message: Earlier this week, the "very long" template was unnecessarily placed by User:Isaidnoway on this bio. Kim is a major athlete in her sport and there are lots of sources that cover her life and career, so the length of her bio is warranted. Babe Ruth, for example, a bio about a major athlete in his sport, an FA, and a level-4 vital article (this one is level-5), is over 18,500 words, while this one is much shorter, at almost 13,000 words. Please explain the reasons for the tag, which should be removed.  Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Remove it if you think the template is inappropriate. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

text: The article is too long to read and navigate comfortably. When an article is too large, consider breaking it into smaller articles or spinning part of it out into a new article. Very long pages are  particularly problematic for readers using slow internet connections or mobile devices.  This article has already experienced this issue of being too long when content had to be split off into Impact of Yuna Kim. See trimming and content removal and address the very long issue accordingly. Don't make it difficult for our readers to read and navigate this article. Isaidnoway (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Isaidnoway, @Bgsu98: I will remove the template. I was hoping that we could keep this discussion in one place, but I refer you to the current discussion at the A-class assessment of this bio. (Scroll down towards the bottom.) Spoiler alert: comprehensiveness vs. article size.  Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , It seems obvious to me that you have already made your mind up that your preferred version of the article being too long to read and navigate comfortably is the only version acceptable. We'll just put this article on our list of inaccessible articles that are too long to read and navigate comfortably for those readers with disabilities and readers using slow internet connections or mobile devices. Isaidnoway (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and we'll start a list of the articles that you work on that are incomplete and incomprehensive.  Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The more complete and comprehensive (too long to read and navigate comfortably), you make this article, just means more readers will walk away from it. The length of an article doesn’t determine its quality, so longer doesn’t necessarily mean more useful content, it just means more content. According to a US government study, 71% of website visitors with disabilities will leave a webpage that is not accessible to them, and this page will be one of them. Isaidnoway (talk) 23:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Very long" tag
Talk:Han Bong-soo

message: I see that someone changed the date of Master Han's from 1931 to 1933. Do we know which one is correct. I know the newspapers published the 1933 date but the are plenty of inaccuracies in that widely published article. i'm writing a dedication and I'd like to have the information be accurate.--Mateo2006 15:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master Han's Date of Birth 

message: Does anyone know how to write master Han's full name in hanja??
Kbarends 06:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hanja

message: The article is chalk full of POV. It should be changed. --Bentonia School 06:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Undid Doshin's change of the name order. (I included redirects for various name orders however so every one will find the correct article regardless of what name order they type in.) All Korean names in article are in Korean order as per Wiki rules. It could also be argued that Master Han was an American and so should use American order. It is a toss up as far as I'm concerned however all other Korean names follow the expressed Wiki rules so to only not follow them for Master Han might be a bit confusing. Thoughts? I'm not really attached to either method but I think narrative consistancy is important.--Mateo2006 21:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Order 

message: I think that much of the POV had been removed from the article and it is on the way to becoming something different that it was when first assessed.
Still needs more content for Master Han's years in America, I think. Also more footnoting for the statements made.--Mateo2006 21:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Why was the photograph of Grand Master Han removed? PhillipAlexHaddox 22:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: There's a very similar article about Bong Soo Han that I think should be merged with this one in terms of content, and one of the articles should then redirect to the other. This way, duplication and dispersion of information could be avoided. I would do it, but I don't have much time, nor do I know enough about the subject to take the responsibility. Jitieicreiz (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very similar article named Bong Soo Han
Talk:Lee Ho-suk

message: I added the information of Lee becoming the South Korean team leader, as well as securing his Olympic berth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.246.152.100 (talk) 04:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Information Concerning the 2010 Winter Olympics 
Talk:Ghausia Colony

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 14:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade
Talk:An Cho-young

message: In the Go article, he is An Joyeong, and in links to this page An Choyoung,
and on the page title, the hyphenated name form An Cho-young.
Why is there no single consensus spelling? 72.200.20.62 (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean spelling
Talk:Gulzar Colony

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 14:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade
Talk:Ryu Seung-min

message: 1.) Is it really of encyclopedic importance what rubbers/bats a player used? 2.) Unless one has the chance to check the equipment personally, there's no way to say what equipment one particular player uses. Especially manufacturer sources are unreliable as players choose the equipment that suits them best and not the equipment from their sponsors.Havlicek stole the ball (talk) 18:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  equipment reference necessary? 
Talk:Kim Chaek University of Technology

message: Dear Fellow Wikipedia Editors:
I understand the concern that articles about North Korea are currently stub articles and I am taking appropriate action to solve the problem.
North Korea is a secretive state, some information about govenrment officials, companies, and events is known from official North Korean media, other information has been reported in foreign media. So, any North Korean article will likely be stub class until a major change in the government.
I am trying to use libary research, instead of just Google, to expand the encyopledia about a largly unknown country. I have found a source to expand the the North Korean articles at the Global Resources Center at the Gelman Library at George Washington University libaray. If someone makes the paper newspaer in DPRK, then that person is noteworthy.
For example, much of the information is from unnamed south korean analysts reported in western news sources. Even , Ri Sol-ju  the wife of Kim Jong-un , is lacking definative information because the DPRK sources are scant. 
Please give editors time to flesh out the articles. I am seeking consensus to increase understanding that stub articles about North Korea my be all that is possible. Please discuss. Geraldshields11 (talk) 23:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yuval Ne'eman

message: IMO, it makes sense to explicitly separate his military/political and scientific careers, most likely, in separate sections. I already started doing this, but then it all got mixed :-( Occuserpens 12:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would an interview with Yuval Neeman from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_8E3B411BFE4349D481B133D6711E4627 (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy? 
Talk:Hawke's Bay Town

message: For the year 2006-07, let us concentrate on upgrading the contents of this page as decided: Wales to upgrade quality of Wiki. Thanks. --Bhadani 14:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Let us upgrade