Talk:List of Bohemian monarchs

message: One of most famous czech king is missing?
:Emperor Charles IV was King Charles I of Bohemia. john k 12:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles IV. 

message: Did not Maria Theresa succeed her father without incident upon his death?  Were there not Austrian garrisons that had to be conquered before the Duke of Bavaria could be proclaimed King of Bohemia?  How is Charles's claim to being King of Bohemia any more credible than, say, Maria Theresa's father's claims to be King of Spain?  At the very least, it seems to me that Maria Theresa should be listed for the whole 1740-1780 period, with Charles VII listed as a rival. john k 12:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maria Theresa and Charles VII 

message: User:Jklamo provided the following edit summary on 18:43, 2 May 2007:
: see discussion, presidents were removed first on 18 april by RandomCritic without notice
This is quite false, and transparently so for anyone who will bother checking the history.  I made no changes involving the list of Presidents on April 18 or any other date. The list of Presidents was removed on 17:47, 27 April 2007 by an anonymous editor using IP 89.216.210.117.  That is not my IP.  I do not know why User:Jklamo wishes to blame me for this change, but I object to it regardless of the reason. RandomCritic 13:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate edit summary

message: Most of the Habsburg rulers were elected as king prior to their predecessors death, and were referred to as "Kings of Bohemia" (and often Hungary as well) at this time.  Should this not be indicated somewhere?  For instance, Maximilian became King of Bohemia in 1548; Rudolf II in 1575, Ferdinand II in 1617, Ferdinand III in 1627, Leopold I in 1656, and Ferdinand V in 1830.  I notice that we do list Ferdinand IV, in spite of his situation being identical to that of these other rulers.  Shouldn't this be noted? john k (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  joint rulers 

message: Maybe some of Monarchical ordinals are strange for someone, but regnal numbers in Bohemia followed line of Holy Roman Emperors, as highest dignity. Charles I was first Emperor of Austria with this name, and himself used number I. References were added.--Yopie (talk) 22:54, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: While I myself am not very convinced by those sources, I do not feel like disputing them. However, I do object to listing kings named Charles simply as Charles IV, Charles II and Charles I. A reader is bound to ask how on Earth Charles I came after Charles II who came after Charles IV. If they are truly never referred to as Charles I, Charles II and Charles III, then the article should list them as Holy Roman Emperor Charles IV, Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI and Emperor Charles I of Austria to make it clear that the ordinals were derived from their imperial titles. Surtsicna (talk) 23:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

text: By the way, here are a few English language sources which refer to Holy Roman Emperor Charles IV as Charles I of Bohemia:  Thus, referring to Charles I of Austria as Charles I of Bohemia can only severely confuse and mislead the readers. Surtsicna (talk) 23:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monarchical ordinals 

message: This article has recently seen the Carolingian dynasty listed as rulers of Bohemia, as has at least one related article (Charles the Younger). This appears to be largely the work of . I applaud the initiative and the effort that has been put into this, and I would hate to discourage it, but I do wonder: is it accurate? From what I've read across several articles, it appears that Charles the Younger subdued the Slavic tribes in the region, but did not conquer or establish Carolingian rule over them. (If he did, how then did the region emerge as a unified polity under Bořivoj, tied to Great Moravia rather than Francia?) -- Perey (talk) 16:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the Carolingians be listed? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* JCKV Karel I.JPG
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion