Talk:Karhade Brahmin

message: Lata Mangeshkar is a Saraswat Brahmin. I think Ashutosh Gowariker too is a Saraswat. Please check your references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.6.11.39 (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lata Mangeshkar, Ashutosh Gowarikar 

message: Lata Mangeshkar belongs to Devadasi community,and their family was serving Mangesh Maharudra temple,and definitely she has got karhade blood in her veins because her father's father was a Karhade ie the priest of Mangesh temple,Balubhat Abhisheki.
I know the Gowarikars. They are Karhade Brahmins.````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.29.182 (talk) 05:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Lata Mangeshkar's caste has been listed on wikipedia as Gomantak Maratha. But it says in her ancestor's webpage that the male ancestry was Karhade Brahmin. So it is surprising how she became a maratha since the custom is to inherit father's caste.  I always assumed she was a Brahmin. It is a big surprise for me. Not that it matters anyway.-Acharya63 (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Mangeshkar family aren't regarded as Brahmins in Goa because Deenanath Mangeshkar's parents weren't married to each other (his pujari father was already married to a Karhade Brahmin lady and had offspring with her, his mother was his father's Devadasi mistress). Only the wife's descendants (like Abhisheki family) are regarded as Karhade Brahmins in Goa, Mangeshkar family are classified as Gomantak Maratha Samaj like Deenanath's mother. Mangeshkar family are also not allowed to perform temple rituals in Mangueshi Temple due to "caste concerns": https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/asha-bhosle-has-not-done-enough-for-goa-bjp-lawmaker-2-760577.html 49.15.232.114 (talk) 01:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: About Lata Mangeshkar

message: The "pandit" in Hemadri Pandit's name is a title, or उपाधि, reserved for scholars of renown and repute in medieval India, and is unlikely to be the surname "Pandit" found predominantly in the karhāḍe brāhmaṇ group. Keshav Appa Padhye's biography of Hemadri Pandit (a copy of which is in my possession) clearly states, on the very first page of the introductory chapter, that Hemadri was a Shuklayajurvedi (adherent of the Shuklayajurved) Vatsagotri (belonging to the Vatsa Gotra) Panchapravari ब्राह्मण(५: जामदग्ना वत्सास्तेषां पञ्चार्षेयो भार्गवच्यावनाप्नवानौर्वजामदग्नेति, ref. आश्वलायनश्रौतसूत्र). Padhye has mentioned the reference for this information to be the book authored by Hemadri himself, चतुर्वर्गचिंतामणि. He states that Hemadri has himself mentioned this in his own book along with the names of his father, grandfather and great-grandfather. Assuming the correctness of this information, the claim that Hemadri was a karhāḍā brāhmaṇ contradicts the information that all karhāḍe brāhmaṇ families are ऋग्वेदीय (adherents of the Ṛgveda), which is easily verifiable even today. The Hemadri-karhāḍe connection has already been removed from the wikipage of Hemadri Pandit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemadpant, because we have no evidence that Hemadri Pandit belonged to the karhāḍe brāhmaṇ group. If nobody responds to the piece of info that I have provided, with positive evidence supporting the claim that Hemadri belonged to the karhāḍe brāhmaṇ group, then it would be advisable, for the purposes of historical accuracy, to remove Hemadri's mention on the karhāḍe brāhmaṇ wikipage.
ThakurPradeep (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Hemadri Pandit a.k.a. hemADpanta 

message: Hi , I see two entries in the Notable people section without source. Can you provide ref them? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay mate. I'll find out and update. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 14:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankds , only N. S. Hardikar remains. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found four people with the Surname Hardikar and all of them belong to Karhade Brahmin community. But unable to find exact community name of N. S. Hardikar. Many of the citations of N. S. Hardikar are referring to him as just Brahmin and not particularly Karhade Brahmin. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I wasn't able to find any source that mentions him as Karhade Brahmin, only Brahmin. I believe we should remove this entry, move it to List of Brahmins. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah! that's better. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 16:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you provide a source . For some reason, google is not returning me the sources proper sources I previously searched, not directing to the specific links. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:    I found this, is it enough -  MRRaja001 (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks a bunch, moved to List of Brahmins. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people 

message: Hi  Do we consider any publication by Popular prakashan to be unreliable? I am particularly baffled by replacement of Kantak's book by Gokhale's.I believe both of them worked for the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute. I have also used many articles by these two for other wikipedia articles. Also for any reader interested in Biniwale, Kantak's book dwelves deeper into the accomplishments of Visaji-pant.I look forward to your comments. Jonathansammy (talk) 15:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sitush has listed one book the under Indic publications of dubious merit. Don't know whether unreliability of one book effects (blacklists) the whole publication. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visaji Biniwale