lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pekka Himanen

message: Maybe there should be a link on Himanen's homepage, too?  Not that it's very informative, but it is definitely on the subject... --Oop 23:48, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)
The language in the statement "This is a new system on the capitalism, that as if abandons capitalism." is obviously not English. I suppose it should be something like "This is a new system after capitalism, as it abandons capitalism", but I have not read the work, so I'm not sure if that is his message.
Perhaps a new photograph would be in order Crossdisciplinarian (talk) 11:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It has to be said that the publicity shot on Global Dignity's website is a lot more flattering, but frustratingly it's not a solo portrait. The criticism section needs expansion; the sources are in Finnish. What was so troubling about his research? Was there a suspicion it was influenced by the Finnish government? Was he arrested for being drunk and disorderly? Where does he describe himself as a professor? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Global Dignity itself needs expansion, too. It appears that its sole, solitary achievement is the declaration that October 16 is Global Dignity Day. Presumably it takes money to run Global Dignity; what happens to this? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:King of the Hill (disambiguation)

message: There's a meaning in darts, but I dont know it. Kampy (talk) 13:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darts meaning 

message: I guess we should decide if this is a short disambiguation page or an article about an American-Canadian animated sitcom. Usually, a typical disambiguation page looks like this: . It should not contain too much text related to a particular subject. Restoring Pages (talk) 23:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this page should be left as a traditional disambiguation page. I'm unaware of any other disambiguation page that includes an infobox for one of its subjects. The change seems to have been made by an anon who might not be very familiar with how disambiguation pages work. You were correct in reverting addition. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk   05:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I cannot but agree with you. Restoring Pages (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Pitbull (disambiguation)

message: I moved the page on the rapper Pitbull to a new page: Pitbull (musician), and added disambig to Pitbull because Pitbull can be confused with the dog breed Pit Bull. Whosyourjudas 00:09, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the three lines about The Pitbulls be combined into one line? --EarthFurst 02:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pitbulls? 

message: I've done a little clean up. The page I edited started by saying Pitbull means a stupid hillbilly or butthead. I delete this and added a link to hillbilly, but I think this might have been a vandalism in the first place. Is pitbull actually used to mean hillbilly?
97.113.105.182 (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Reference to "hillbilly" deleted. Astro$01 (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hillbilly
Talk:Boulder

message: Question:  does a grain mean the same thing in geology as it does in Material science?  If so, a grain 10 inches in diameter seems impossibly large!  I would not expect to find this naturally (Neutron Stars, etc. notwithstanding). 142.157.103.144 (talk) - 15:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Grain" is used not in the sense of grains in metals or crystal but in the sense of grains in granular materials like clay, sand, gravel, etc. mike4ty4 (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also think that "grain size" for rock and boulder is not applicable in common language. May be for scientific use it is OK, but it is just funny to read in a lexicon... I corrected it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSoos (talk • contribs) 17:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Clast size' is probably a better term, although I see that Wentworth's original 1922 paper also refers to 'fragments' or 'pieces'. However, 'grain size' is the term typically used for sediments or rocks. Mikenorton (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I question the statement "In British English a rock is bigger than a boulder"
Neither the Cambridge Dictionary (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rock), the Macmillan Dictionary (https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/boulder) or the Dictionary linked in the sources (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/rock) give reason to believe that.
Just the opposite, the first two dictionaries define a boulder as "a very large rock" (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/boulder & https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/boulder) which to me is the opposite of the statement in question. 2003:C9:672B:9F59:3C4A:50D5:A78D:21E (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I founnd the statement that a boulder is a rock fragment with size greater than 25.6 cm (10.1 in) in diameter surprising though it apparently has a source - on looking back though, this started as 256mm / 10 inches which makes more sense - yet another example of the conversion template producing nonsense. Can it be fixed by someone familiar with these things? Geopersona (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Size distinction
Talk:Proinsias De Rossa

message: Added information from entry on (misspelt) "Prionsias de Rossa" and redirected that page to this one.
Previous history of that page:
(cur) (last)  03:00, 20 Mar 2004 Minesweeper m (dab TD)
(cur) (last)  18:01, 19 Feb 2004 159.134.52.81
Palmiro 02:30, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Further reading cites "The Workers Party in Dáil Éireann: The First Ten Years, The Workers Party, 1991" - but I can't find this thing.  What is it, a book?  It's not in the online bookshops.  Using a search engine to search for "The Workers Party in Dáil Éireann" only finds this Wikipedia page (and the Wikipedia rip-off sites).  Unless this work does exist (but maybe the title is wrong?) I think this thing that cannot be further read should be outed from the Further reading section. 159.134.78.128 12:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's a book. It's in the University College Dublin library, and I very carefully copied the title from it there (and the citation of The Workers Party as author/publisher is as per the book itself and the UCD library catalogue). So it can stay, and it is possible for other people to find it. The Workers Party had enough ousters of one sort or another in its day, surely we don't need any more! Palmiro | Talk 16:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of the further reading section 

message: De Rossa was Member of the European Parliament between 1989 and 1992. But who replaced him 1992 - 1994 in the European Parliament, when he left it 1992 ?   --62.104.146.209 20:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MEP

message: I altered "..former Labour Party politician" to "..former politician" because surely it is usual to avoid trying to sum up a multi-party career with the name of just one party, especially in such a case as this where the subject achieved a significant position in three of the four parties of which he has been a member. If anyone objects, perhaps "..former left-wing politician" would be the right way to go. Harfarhs (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First line
Talk:District court

message: Whups, I jumped the gun moving this article to District Court (UK) after reading the first line -- that's what it was originally about.  Then I saw the second paragraph that expands the original scope of the article.  So I moved it back.  We all make mistakes. (Blushes.) Kbh3rd 02:33, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sir George Cayley's coachman

message: from VfD:
absurdly minor character to an important, however not stunningly famous figure in the history of flight.  or perhaps we should create pages for the assistants of all other scientists? ✈ James C. 02:45, 2004 Sep 17 (UTC)
*Delete:  Ok, so there's this guy, see, and we don't know his name, but we're going to write an article about him.  Merge and redirect to the inventor's article. Geogre 03:49, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The above vote was by User:Average Earthman
*Keep. First airplane pilot. Should be linked from Sir George Cayley and other places though.  — Gwalla | Talk 17:11, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Antonov An-225 Mriya

message: Video report showing closeups confirming the 225 markings and the complete write off of the vehicle: 
https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/t6cvri/close_up_view_of_destroyed_an225/
0:43 to see the hull markings on the cockpit and the remains of the port wing.
* If only a source appropriate according to WP:RS can be obtained then I don't see why the page cannot be updated for that. I see the post you referenced in talk used a TV clip. --71.198.188.8 (talk) 08:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  She's definitely destroyed 

message: No source support the sentence in summary; "On 24 February 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the An-225 was reportedly destroyed…"
This summary sentence also directly contradicts content in the related body section, and I propose the summary to be amended, removing the date since there's no proof for the exact date of its perish.
Specifically, I propose the aforementioned sentence to be changed to "During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the An-225 was reportedly destroyed after Russian forces attacked Hostomel forces attacked Hostomel Airport."
In addition, further edits may be appropriate considering the emergence of new evidence very recently.--71.198.188.8 (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. --Ferien (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary section on destruction: date 

message: At the end of the operational history section, there's the sentence "On 5 march a video posted on...".
The correct date is 4 march, as right now it's 11:41 of the 4th of march 2022 in Hostomel. 151.46.15.48 (talk) 09:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date 

message: The latest image added to the article, :File:Destoryed_AN225.png, appears to show the foward fuselage and centre section destroyed but the port (left hand when facing it from behind) wing and rear fuselage structures appear intact. I do think that "destroyed" is unconfirmed until Antonov give an official statement of its condition. In the light of the continuing edit war over its condition, I am hoping to build a consensus here. I propose that the article describe it as "badly damaged", while acknowledging reports of "destruction". How do others think we should describe it? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the reliable ref: .--Marc Lacoste (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now, most reliable sources state that the aircraft was destroyed.  Therefore, I think it's best to describe it as such until Antonov decides to repair it or write it off. - ZLEA T\C 14:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's destroyed with an estimated $3bln repair estimate.  Ukraine announced it intends to rebuild it, using possibly the 70% finished 2nd airframe, if it's still intact.  I think it’s unlikely to happen.  Technophant (talk) 23:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal
Category talk:Footwear

message: I hope I didn't mess up this category. I had used it as a template to learn how to create categories and I blew it, but managed to restore Category:Footwear. whiskers (talk) 05:12, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hope

message: How to add more categories in this section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by  203.189.231.4 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Beach Sandals" could be a sub-category at Footwear section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.189.231.4 (talk • contribs) 2:38, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding More Categories
Talk:Kenji Shimizu

message: Tendoryu redirects to Tendo-ryu, which is a disambig page - pointing back here. If there is only one article on the man and his style, wouldn't it be better to put it under the style? / Habj 04:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Tendo-ruy (aikido)]]? 
Talk:Draco Rosa

message: There are two birth dates given here. Which is correct? --James barton 06:09, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The one given here:   —Joseph | Talk 06:55, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
**wow I can't believe that phamtomvox, his own site, has his birthday wrong. In the Frio album it said he was born in 1969 and in a recent interview in Puerto Rico he said he had just turned 36.<<Coburn_Pharr>> 06:23, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the Personal Life section an update on his health does not list a date. Just "Up until today". A date is needed.  Instead use "As of Month Year, ____". I hope he continues to heal. ~~LSM, 2011/10/23  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.247.228.232 (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:Smarta tradition

message: I am proposing to instate this lead.  Note I have also provided supporting academic quotes.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: New Lead 

message: *Support - Per above.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I'm not sure whether it is better or not, but the article title needs to be addressed - perhaps after changing the lead.  At the very least, "tradition" should not be capitalized. Huw Powell (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Word Brahman is used incorrectly. Maybe attempt is to refer to Brahmins. 83.99.11.191 (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong usage of Brahman word
Talk:Optician

message: A word analogy is not a good definition. Revolver 06:25, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: Contact lens is currently nominated to be improved on Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. Please support the article with your vote. --Fenice 10:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Improvement Drive

message: Coren reported that material in the section on Canada was a copyright violation when I tried to refactor it into a new page. I think a lot of the other stuff in 'Canada' could be a cut and paste too.. I've asked if Coren could check it, if not I might come back in a few days and do something manually. Umptious 11:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: I feel as though a lot of information was lost in the most current updates, or perhaps there is room for much expansion. I'll help add more to the topic if I can soon. Reason turns rancid 21:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest re-write 

message: I removed an external link to what appeared to be a random private optician in India. This isn't the yellow pages
71.35.188.32 05:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oct 8 

message: I think it's bizarre to list just a few selected opticians in US/UK. Why advertise these companies and not others? Why not list every country world wide if you are going to do it at all? I'm sure wikipedia readers are quite capable of finding a service in their own country.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.176.130 (talk) 08:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire list actually has more problems than being selective, it goes against Wikipedia guidelines per WP:LINKFARM and WP:ELNO. External links should contain further information re:what is an optician? I have removed almost the entire list because of that, it was just a directory of organizations. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 02:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why list selected companies in chosen countries? 

message: A page on optician have to contain information on every optician in the world and on the scientific, so static, position of this working class. This page is on some optician and it's not complete in every way. I ask to move some pices of the page on others single page like optician (USA), optocians list (USA) ecc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.222.71.116 (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is not on opticians, it may be make by an USA or UK company 

message: The first section of this is extremely misleading when it says that opticians are also called "dispensing opticians". I have long understood there to be two types of opticians - dispensing, who sell spectacles, and opthalmic, who are concerned with assessment of eye health and who assess eyesight. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Opthalmic versus dispensing

message: Spam or list of significant independent trade associations?  Andy Dingley (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trade Associations Sortable Table
Talk:Earl of Mar

message: In view of the fact of the divergent numbering for the same individuals between 1550 and 1866, perhaps the article titles for those individuals should be changed to make them, well, more distinctively individual?
There are too many John Erskines : do I want the article titled the 20th Earl or the 19th, for instance?  A trap for the unwary!
It is very easy to think that Wikipedia contributors have made a mistake, when in fact it is reality which is confusing in this case.
You could use the subsidiary Lord Erskine title to number these individuals or refer to one of the dates of creation of the two Earldoms, or even have a subtitle referring to the other numbering.
213.246.92.141 (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've make the corrections, an Earl was missing. Now it's ok. PurpleHz (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article titles 

message: The article as it stands appears to be non-neutral
The text states that there are two extant creations of the earldom of Mar, resulting from a confusion in the 19th century, and so we have two earls of Mar. The article as it stands appears to be pushing the POV that one of them is somehow superior to the other. ("as the result of a mistake..." Really?) 
So I’ve edited it to restore the neutrality somewhat. Swanny18 (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: The numbering seems a lot better, now; congrats to PurpleHz for fixing that. There's still a bit of an issue; Burkes has Margaret (current titleholder) as 31st, but Leigh Rayment, and the Tribe of Mar website (which seems to be connected to the family somehow) have her as 30th. I've put a note in, but I'm only assuming that's the reason. Can anybody with access to Burkes confirm it? Swanny18 (talk) 23:47, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering 

message: Seems like the statement about the Genesis song that: "...depicts the failure of the unsuccessful Jacobite campaign and the innocence of the Earl's young son." could use a bit of elucidation, so far as time/place of the reference if it's to be included. Not saying it shouldn't be included, but it just seems to come out of nowhere, reference-wise. o0drogue0o 13:49, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   In popular culture
Talk:On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude

message: Michael, no "thousands" is not an exaggeration. Revolver 07:52, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Influenced "thousands" of researchers

message: We need a German version too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.215.45.173 (talk) 02:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need German article

message: what does the +inf to +inf integral mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertobosia (talk • contribs) 18:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about this as well, and so asked about it over on the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Mathematics/2012 August 22#Riemann's integral from infinity to infinity. It turns out the integral is a contour integral. —SeekingAnswers (reply) 21:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  help in understanding 

message: See the original paper in  - pages 671-680, 10 pages if I am counting correctly. Thanks, אבינעם (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your source does show it to be 10 pages, and so I've gone ahead and fixed the page count within this Wikipedia article. —Lowellian (reply) 02:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 pages or 10 pages? 

message: The article says, at this moment:
Since this paper was published in 1859, and it used the notation s = σ + it, how can this same notation have started more than fourty years later in 1903 with Landau? I don't think this correct. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the history of the complex notation to repair it.--87.209.32.98 (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Riemann just uses s=1/2+it on the critical line, not σ+iτ.  Although this doesn't really settle your objection entirely, and we should still seek a source for the statement in the article, or remove it altogether. I think the correct statement is that Riemann introduced the letter "s" that is traditional with the zeta function, and Landau standardized the notation for the real and imaginary parts of s.  Sławomir Biały (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

text: I agree with Slowomir; I cannot parse this sentence at all, despite being a professional mathematician. Since Slawomir's comment is 6 months old by now and the original author has not fixed the issue, I am removing the sentence. JamieVicary (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction of notation 

message: According to reference 7 in the article of Riemann in the German Wikipedia, the paper was Über die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Größe, and not Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse, as it reads in the article. In many publications, for example, Möbius is not written Moebius, nor is it in Wikipedia. The name of the article may well be On the number..., but the original German name should be correct, without transliterations. K9re11 (talk) 11:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the published title really was "Ueber...". See the image I just added in the article. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 18:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration
Talk:Maly Trostenets

message: Maly Trostenets redirects here, shouldn't there be a separate article about the village? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maly Trostenets

message: The spelling without "i" gets twice as many hits on google scholar: . Site is not commonly described as an "extermination camp" in reliable sources:  Should follow the same convention as Babi Yar, Kalevi-Liiva, Bronna Góra, etc. buidhe 06:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Tom Smith (filker)

message: Although this is a good start for an article, it could use additional sourcing materials.Shsilver 16:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Just a note on external links: presently, it seems there's a bit of overkill (from the POV of Wikipedia not being a directory).  If there's a way of linking to fewer sites from which all the sites can be found, it wouldn't be a bad idea to implement.
Not a major point, but I thought I'd offer something helpful after the other day.  Cheers. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 19:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a note on external links 

message: FilkerTom has been re-included in the above article.  If someone more expert in his output would help in referencing the note on him, I'd be grateful. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 21:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cthulhu in popular culture]] 

message: Included in the article on Nelson Mandela, along with the other songs inspired by this notable statesman.  Being listed alongside Bob Marley can't do Tom's rep any harm!
User:CalendarGrrl 16:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandel[l]a