Talk:1989 Loma Prieta earthquake

message: We have ten-year old cruft here that's collecting dust. I think it's time to move all of this to /Archive_2, if anyone has the time and inclination to do so. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to do Archive_2? 

message: :File:Abc-worldseries-card.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 00:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Abc-worldseries-card.jpg

message: Someone with better knowledge than I could add a section about how the Chronicle (or maybe the Examiner?) managed to get published even though the paper's entire physical plant was out of commission.  The newspaper was more or less thrown together with Macintoshes and printed elsewhere (Sacramento, I think).  The paper was not typeset as normal but instead was a mishmash of laserprinted stories (often in different typefaces).  I recall that everyone was astounded that the paper sort of magically appeared the next day -- very impressive, and a reassuring example of resilience and can-doism in the face of disaster.  I wish I'd kept a copy. Cellmaker (talk) 01:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That kind of content would probably be best presented on the articles for the newspapers as it's really about them and not about the earthquake and/or the effects of the earthquake. Dawnseeker2000 04:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SF Chronicle continued to publish 

message: I've read this repeatedly, but I can't parse it in any way that makes any sense: 'The Federal Communications Commission later investigated the issue of KNBR's EBS malfunction, calling the fail "revoked".' Does anyone know what this sentence actually means? Dstar3k (talk) 01:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This was added on 13:39, 9 April 2021, and has not been changed since as far as I can tell. Unless someone can explain what it's supposed to mean in the next week, I'm going to delete it. Dstar3k (talk) 01:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This makes no sense 

message: There was a great deal of destruction in downtown Los Gatos. After the earthquake, my boyfriend took me there on his motorcycle. I remember seeing commercial buildings on the Main Street whose front double doors were off kilter, one side was higher than the other. Los Gatos damage is barely mentioned. I wish I had pictures. I know there was at least one building collapsed into rubble. This article only mentions broken windows and toppled chimneys. I cried when I saw the damage in Los Gatos. It was a pretty little town. 72.130.17.17 (talk) 03:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Los Gatos