lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Capitol District

message: It's actually called the Capital District. Here's my evidence:
*Googling  albany "capital district"  yields "about 90,900" results; Googling  albany "capitol district"  yields "about 9630".
*Googling  albany "capital district"  on Google Groups yields "about 3290" results; Googling  albany "capitol district"  yields "about 156".
*The CDTA is the Capital District Transportation Authority.
*The CDRPC is the Capital District Regional Planning Commission.
So I'm moving it. —msh210 17:27, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital District, not Capitol District
Talk:Junagadh

message: should have separate page for the old kingdom and its modern day location --80.1.250.215 (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for Kingdom of Junagadh

message: Is it true that the original name meant "city of the Yonas"?
Nope - that is an urban legend. "Juna" as used in Junagadh has nothing to do with "Yona" or "Yavana". In Sorathi, or the colloquially spoken gujarati, it translates as "Old fort".
===Yavana,Jana, Gyan, Dnyan===
Yavana, Jana, Gyan, Dnyan, all have some relation.
:::vkvora 08:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yonas

message: Yavana, Jana, Gyan, Dnyan, all have some relation.
:::vkvora 08:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yavana,Jana, Gyan, Dnyan

message: Some references have been supplied, so I removed the unreferenced tag today.  Many more verifiable facts are needed.Fconaway 01:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I have uploaded three images in this aricles, which are desperately needed. I also arranged history of junagadh. Please search more information of this beautiful city and add in this articles  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadia gaurang (talk • contribs) 10:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three new images are added 
Talk:Melarsoprol

message: This drug also contains melamine in its structure. Is there any data about kidney toxicity? 62.143.171.2 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Melamine

message: Is there an image around with a line drawing structure for this drug?  It would be helpful.OcciMoron 18:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: Under Alternatives it is stated that: "Moreover, eflornithine is effective only for West African sleeping sickness (caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense); it has no effect on East African sleeping sickness (caused by Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense)."
This is not consistent with the Wikipedia-entry of eflornithine nor the one on African trypanosomiasis. Is there a reference for the statement or is it due to confusion with pentamidine and suramin that has then been misapplied? 81.224.47.12 (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selectivity of eflornithine 

message: The structure of melarsen oxide is not "shown below".
"Two arsenic-containing stereoisomers exist in a 3:1 molar ratio." should not be under "Dosage".
69.72.92.13 (talk) 08:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  misc. problems 

message: We are going to improve the lead by editing the diction and grammar. Some sections we believed that require expansion are pregnancy/lactation considerations, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics. It would also be beneficial to mention warnings, black box warnings, and cautionary statements. We are going to add the mechanism of action and explain the current place in therapeutics for African trypanosomiasis. We also might add a brief explanation for the use in special populations such as pediatrics and geriatrics. Elaine will be in charge of pregnancy/lactation. Ashley will work on side effects, black box warnings and cautionary statements. Felice will research the mechanism of action and the drug's place in therapy. Felicewu595 (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group 15- Suggested Edits To Melarsoprol 

message: Does this article address a neutral point of view?
I think the information provides a very good foundation for readers to get a basic understanding of the drug. Initially, I thought the sentence, "All people diagnosed with trypanosome-caused disease should be treated with an antitrypanosomal," was not neutral enough, but I checked the reference provided and realized that it was indeed a statement made by the CDC. This article consistently provides factual information that is supported by valid resources and does not try to bias the readers.  Sophia.lai (talk) 23:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Group 16 - Peer Review 

message: How many people die from this disease in a year? 98.115.125.148 (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many people die from this disease in a year
Talk:Types of Pokémon moves

message: I'm pretty sure connect is not the right word to be using in this article... Deskana 23:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Connect?

message: This article needs in the best possible scenario a WikiProject for its own cleaning-up. REMEMBER "Pokémon" is ALWAYS capitalized and has an acute accent (´)! And lots of other mistakes and unencyclopedic material.
:I fixed that, and also the inappropriate person used. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 18:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it seems that there's still work to be done. I'll do what I can over the next few hours/days/however long it takes. ~e.o.t.d~ 03:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OMG... 

message: Might someone interpret the "Types" in the title to mean the elemental types of Pokémon and their moves (like Fire, Psychic, etc.)?  If so, perhaps we ought to use a word other than "type".  --Brandon Dilbeck 16:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i had considered that when moving this page... but no better word came to mind. Suggestions? -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 05:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some suggestions: Classification, Category, Effects... -JC 05:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't we just move it to "Pokémon moves"?—ウルタプ 05:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I think "Pokémon moves" would work.  Also, on a semi-related note, I can easily see this article getting AFDed for game guide. Bhamv 11:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading article title?
Talk:The Golden Gate (Seth novel)

message: Not much of a start.  I created this in a rush to sort out the mislink from Vikram Seth Number 0 18:28, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:FSB

message: This article should be merged to KGB. dima (talk) 09:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You probably mean articles KGB and Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation.  I do not think merging is appropriate. That was the KGB of the Soviet Union. It has been divided into agencies of former Soviet republics (one of them still existing KGB of Belorussia). Russian part was divided to FSB and SVR. Even Soviet agencies are described in separate articles like NKVD, KGB, etc.Biophys (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005

message: This information was moved form George W. Bush's first term as president of the United States because it has little information about Bush, however still has good information. I wasn't sure what the actual name of the bill was so I moved it to here for the time being.--The_stuart 17:55, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This had almost no references, etc. I am attempting to organize content, add wikilinks, etc. It is a work in process.Oceanflynn (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding citations, re-organizing
Talk:Hero (RPG World)

message: from VfD:
Contents are "The main protagonist of the video game based webcomic, RPG World." Would be a speedy candidate under proposed cases #1: "Extremely short articles which add no information beyond what is obvious from the title". Delete please. - RedWordSmith 18:58, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete. Fancruft. --Improv 21:07, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Carolinian zone

message: Is this term only used in Canada? What is it called in the US? Adam Bishop 19:13, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This region would be described as Eastern Deciduous forest in the US. The biome classification scheme used for Wikipedia breaks up that region into several entries in the section Temperate_broadleaf_and_mixed_forests#Nearctic_ecozone. --Big_Iron 12:43, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that this article is in some ways redundant with the article Carolinian forest.  This is a better article and avoids anything that may be interpreted as PoV.  However, the other article does include a few points that are pertinent to any discussion of Carolinian areas and is more general, in that it includes both Canada and the US.
Perhaps a single article with two sections identifying differences between and uniqueness of the two countries' forests (e.g. extensive in US, small in Canada).
Michael Daly 21:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Carolinian Forest?
Wikipedia talk:Pages needing attention/Archive 1

message: Moved from Wikipedia:Village pump on Saturday, August 2nd, 02003.
I've been inserting articles and editing for a few months now and would enjoy any critical feedback anybody might have so I can improve my contributions to this encyclopaedia.  (If this isn't the proper place to ask for this, I apologise.)  --MTR (严加华) 01:55 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
: I often feel like this myself. Perhaps we should setup a page such as Wikipedia:Requests for Review so people can ask people to cast an eye over new articles or contributions? This could help catch sp and typo errors. CGS 11:16 25 Jul 2003 (UTC).
::I agree that this is a good idea. Perhaps it could include some sort of mentoring and offer advice rather than using the Village Pump for this. I'm not sure about the name Wikipedia:Requests for Review though. Angela 18:17 28 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Perhaps you can use Wikipedia:Pages needing attention? Maybe you can create a new section within the page. Tomos 12:24, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Later, someone set up Wikipedia:Peer review, which fits exactly the bill MTR was looking for. Pete 20:31, 18 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentoring / Request for review

message: Is this page closed or something? Martin has just changed the intro from "... list it here so that others can find it" to "...  then drop a note on its talk page, and go on to the next page and see if you can fix that instead". Is there a need to discourage using the page? I realise it is rather large, but I don't feel messages on talk pages will have the required effect. Angela. 09:01, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
*This page is not dead AT ALL. I am unsure what Martin's intent was, but I reverted it until we can get a better explanation. Kingturtle 09:08, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted to encourage folks to use Talk pages first (and in some cases only), but I couldn't think of a good way to phrase that. Martin 16:02, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Page closed?
Talk:The Road to Serfdom

message: I am quite disturbed by what I found here. If you have some valid criticism, cite it, but the wikipedia is not to have an editorial bias, especially not to the exclusion of needed info. Sam Spade Arb Com election 12:18, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The first sentence of this section is editorializing and non-verifiable (i.e. whether Hayek is "clear" when read in full. Clear to whom?).  I think it should be deleted.
Aside from the unnecessary part about when Hayek lived, the rest of the paragraph is non-verifiable (i.e. that the work is timeless) or editorializing (i.e. that readers need to read history first).  I recommend the entire paragraph be deleted.
Overall the section reads like an apology for Hayek.  The cited items seem relevant but I wonder if they could be included in a separate section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.120.140.241 (talk) 05:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have gone ahead and done this. --Jaydavidmartin (talk) 01:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cautions and clarifications 

message: Hayek discusses Johann Plenge but has not been mentioned in the summary? Leutha (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with the summary
Talk:James Wong Jim

message: I'd suggest anyone can write on his early life.  I heard that he was a very devoted Catholic.  Once he even decided to be a priest.  However, there was some "turning points" that changed his attitude about religion.
by investorjoe 17:49ET, July 14, 2005
----
Just created the article James Wong (which has 2 relevant wiki links into it but needs dab) before coming here. I would propose merging these into James Wong Jim (which incidentally was the bolded entry for both articles)
-Hlaw 19:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done wshun 14:09, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article currently gives February 21, 1940 as his dob, while IMDb gives 16 February 1940. olivier 20:04, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:DigitalEurope

message: Recent edits remade the lead to be a near copy of 2013 docs and the current official website http://member.digitaleurope.org/website/home.aspx.  Some of what was there before also appears to have been copied, or at least a very close paraphrase (the 2012 statement of vision and mission are copied from http://www.digitaleurope.org/Ourwork.aspx).  So I took it out and replace it with a copyvio tag as suggested at :Template:Copyvio and WP:Copyright problems#Instructions.  If someone knows of a suitable license from the originator we can put it back.  Or someone can rewrite it.  Dicklyon (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 
Category talk:Fictional detectives

message: *I agree with the below comment strongly and also belive that Hetty Wainthropp should be added.
*Should Adrian Monk be added to this page?
*There is a Wiki Article for Monk (TV series) already, but I can't find out how to edit this page.
*There is a fictional nineteenth-century detective named Martin Hewitt, but if we list him and give him an article, he will need to be disambiguated from the twentieth-century impostor.
*I also note that alphabetization is haphazard, with Miss Jane Marple, Marty Burns, Perry Mason, Matthew Scudder, and Joseph Matula appearing in that order, alternating first and last names. J S Ayer 17:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at Wikipedia:Category. I don't think you entirely understand the concept. You add articles to categories by adding the category to the article, not by editing the category page. -- Necrothesp 02:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be some demand to know about fictional detectives by nationality, if anyone fancies that task.  --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: By nationality

message: This category should be moved/renamed to :Category:Fictional detectives and criminal investigators. --72.67.93.68 (talk) 22:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: These examples should be moved to sub categories; characters should be listed as what particular type of detective they are; amateur private, police etc. CensoredScribe (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a container category
Talk:Smithtown, New York

message: I propose a separate article for the school district, as there is a lot of information on this page, and a lot more to write about it. Any objections? Mazeau (talk) 04:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smithtown Central School District 

message: It seems that identifying the animal as a bull implies "anatomical correctness" in the usual US meaning of the euphemism.  Emphasizing that aspect of the statue unnecesarily is distracting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggpauly (talk • contribs) 19:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  anatomically correct bull? 

message: Local legend also has it that Richard Smith duped the Native American Chief by having other bulls strategically placed along his anticipated route in order to switch from tired bulls to fresh bulls, allowing him to cover more ground during the daylight hours and gain more territory for himself.Psudaddy (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than one bull 

message: What is it about the article that has prompted so many citation tags in April 2017? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  15:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why all the April 2017 Citation tags?
Talk:A Planet Called Treason

message: Since there are two versions of this book (A Planet Called Treason in 1979 and simply Treason in 1988, could there be a revisions section on this page that outlines the differences between them? There's a short summary of this in the 1988 version, and I'm sure that there are more materials online. Zepheus 21:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. SDG 23:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add bits of his Author's Note from the 1988 version. Maybe someone else can find a bit more. Zepheus 02:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions between versions

message: I've got a map of the planet Treason from the book that I've uploaded. Maybe we could even include a list of the different regions, including the occupation of the founder of the region, and the skills they've honed throughout the years. Here's a link to what I've started. Fill in what you know. Treason Region Chart
- Zepheus 03:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit worried that the map is copyrighted by Card.  I am not sure what the rules are on this.  I know scanning a picture of the cover of books seems to be allowed, so maybe this is too.
SDG 14:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also a bit worried by that. I believe it's fair use because it is being used the illustrate an important part of the book. If there are any issues, I will surely be contacted. Zepheus 18:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map and regions
Talk:Livermorium

message: Not true! See Greenwood and Earnshaw, p. 117, for studies of sd hybridisation in CaF2. Double sharp (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: More about spin-orbit effects for H2X (X = Te, Po, Lv): http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2187001 Double sharp (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'This is the first molecule to be studied in detail to display this phenomenon, dubbed "supervalent hybridization"' 

message: This article and those on the other superheavy elements talk about how they were discovered by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. I know the teams worked together, but was the element actually discovered at both facilities? Would you say radon was discovered in Canada because that's where Ernest Rutherford and Robert B. Owens were at the time? Squee3 (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Lv atoms were seen at JINR, but the Cm target necessary for their production was made at LLNL. (Same for the pairs Fl/Pu, Mc,Ts/Bk, and Og/Cf). Hence cooperation was necessary and both facilities receive credit. Double sharp (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but the question is where it was discovered, not by whom. Squee3 (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was certainly discovered in Dubna, then. Double sharp (talk) 03:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! That's the information I needed. Squee3 (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about the discovery 

message: So it's possible to be possible to make hydrogen-livermoride... Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because Fr is more electronegative than Cs does not mean that Lv is more electronegative than Po. The two situations are different; for Fr 7s is relativistically stabilised, but for Lv 7p3/2 is relativistically destabilised. Double sharp (talk) 13:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. Indeed, Lv is expected to be significantly more electropositive than Po. Double sharp (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  But the things about Fr say that EN(Fr)>EN(Cs)
Category talk:Creationism

message: There are a number of articles listed in this category (creationism), and in the parent category (pseudoscience). Can we get these articles moved out of the parent cat? They mostly seem to just be cluttering things up over there; doesn't seem to serve much of a point. Pseudoscience currently has 140 articles in it, which is too many. Removing the creationism and i/d articles would drop this number by about 20. I tried doing this on my own but was promptly reverted. ...linas 02:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moving specific articles out of a category because it is full seems unwise, but keeping them in a subcategory is fine. -- Ec5618 03:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It'd seem to make more sense to keep this category in pseudoscience, but remove the individual articles which are categorized under pseudoscience. -Will Beback 07:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Pseudoscience]] 

message: Looking through this category and especially the things not in this category, it seems like this category is really about Creationism as a doctrine of some parts of Judaism, Christian, and Islam, not about the topic more generally. Nearly all creationist views not from those traditions seem to be categorized separately, for example in places like :Category:Creator deities and :Category:Creation stories. Is that the intent? --Delirium 01:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this category about Judeo-christian-islamic creationism? 

message: Would such a subcategory be worthwhile? As well as the major ones (Scopes, Epperson, McLean, Edwards, Kitzmiller), there are numerous smaller ones (e.g.Bishop v. Aronov, Webster v. New Lenox School District). A specific subcategory would make them easier to track down. HrafnTalkStalk 12:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creationism court cases subcategory 

message: The article on Creationism says that it has two branches, Creation science and Intelligent design, which are considered pseudoscience. That indicates that the category should be in those subcategories, and not in this parent category. Science education organizations in the U.S. in particular generally say they have no problems with creationism as a religious belief, only when it masquerades as science. So I have removed :Category:Pseudoscience, and added it to :Category:Intelligent design and :Category:Creation science. The category was added by an IP editor last November (see above for previous discussion). StAnselm (talk) 03:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudoscience category, again
Talk:Juan Crisóstomo Arriaga

message: I removed the line "He is remembered today as much for his potential as for his completed work." I read that somewhere but can't remember where, or who said it. Probably Fétis. I removed it because I thought it could trigger a copyvio red flag. Dmetric 21:19, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the program notes to the Naxos edition of the qartets, he died of a pulmonary infection. Opus131 (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are 79,000 ghits for "Juan Arriaga composer" without Crisostomo, and only 131,000 ghits with Crisostomo.  That suggests he's best known simply as "Juan Arriaga".  Comments?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 06:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The above looks nonsensical.  That must have been my day for being on drugs or something.  Let me try again:
* there are 184,000 hits for juan arriaga excluding "crisostomo"
* but only 16,000 hits for juan crisostomo arriaga.
Ergo, he is much better known as simply "Juan Arriaga".
But the next issue is whether there's a "de" in his name, and even we have a bet each way.  We call him "de Arriaga" in the lede and the infobox (which shouldn't be there anyway), but the article title and the section headed Life have just "Arriaga", without any "de".  
Can we please agree on the form of his name, and use it consistently?  --  ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ [your turn] 06:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisited