Talk:Generation III reactor

message: This statement:
:The reactors are used in nuclear power plants to produce nuclear power from nuclear fuel.
Was 1) unnecessary and 2) of questionable accuracy (the AP1000, EPR, etc refer to the plants themselves).  Just in case anyone had any questions there. theanphibian 21:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Generation III reactor

message: I think this article would be improved by making it more list oriented.  I'll try that later. theanphibian 20:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization

message: The consensus appears to be that this will not be moved. theanphibian 21:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Will Probably Stand, and not be merged 

message: This article is terrible, both factually and stylistically.  There are major factual errors in all of the the article's sections, and it is entirely too brief.  I will propose the following changes:
: - a comprehensive review of pages describing generation I, II, III, III+, and IV designs
: - a complete rewrite of the introduction for this article to correctly reflect what gen III is
: - a complete rewrite of the subsections to correctly reflect which designs are classified as what
I will take a quick pass at it right now, but I do not have the time to fix all of the wiki's problems.  It is hard to believe that I am the only registered user in this entire enterprise who has worked for and has expert knowledge of the nuclear industry.  Lwnf360 03:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to have an interested expert. Interested to see your contributions. Andrewa (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup-rewrite

message: To clarify which are just designs and which are real : Each section could be converted from lists to a table - possibly to include year of first construction start, year of first operation, and number of construction starts ? - Rod57 (talk) 03:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Idea man, be bold and make your changes. - Boundarylayer (talk) 08:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't spend a lot of time on this topic and don't want to step on anyone's toes - but I see we now have two very useful tables under Gen III+ for example. My thanks to whoever did those. - Rod57 (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make tables and indicate which have started construction 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The first table in Lists of Generation III+ reactors has a column for first grid connection - but it would also be great if the ones under construction could say when construction started - either as an extra column, or by sharing the "first grid connection" column ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The table in Lists of Generation III+ reactors - add construction start 

message: Olkiluoto 3 is a third-gen (EPR (nuclear reactor)) reactor Saltsjöbaden (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olkiluoto 3 should be listed on this page