Talk:Global Guardian

message: I took some of these links from an article, 'Execution of the September 11, 2001 attacks' by User:Ghost of Jefferson.  The article itself, I think, lacks focus and is currently considered for deletion.  However, I thought the links on Vigilant Guardian deserved preserving.  By the way, that article also alludes to two further interesting exercises which may have taken place that day: 'Global Guardian', mentioned in an Omaha World Herald, article mirrored, and 'Northern Vigilance', mentioned in an a Toronto Star article, mirrored here.   As I say, both are very interesting, but I know nothing of these publications, these are only single sources, and are only mirrors of these sources.  Pending harder information, I thought I'd make a note here in the Talk page in case anyone was interested.  - Crosbie
"What some consider to be 9//1 conspiracy theories is an example of "weasel words".  If wikipedia classifies them as conspiracy theories (which does not prima facie make a claim to their being false) the "some consider" is unnecessary and against policy. - 216.207.246.230 01:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: I am new to this article, please help. I quote:
:The actual information about the war games on september 11th may be different from the 911 commision's report.
Could someone please define: The actual information? Which, what, where, in what respect?<BR>Thx. — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a contentless statement.  The user who added that also destroyed the article formatting.  I reverted the whole lot back to February when these changes were made. - Crosbiesmith 20:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  please clarify 

message: Looks like Arthur Rubin wins his edit war for the day, as the 3RR rule intervenes. But since the Global Guardian program figures highly into 9/11 alternative theories -- indeed, since it is the cornerstone of the very most high-profile theories -- it should be mentioned in the article here or at least linked as a related topic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.81.74 (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The part of the article that is relevant to 9/11 is and should be only in United States government operations and exercises on September 11, 2001, or split off into a separate article on the 2001 instance of Global Guardian.  I added the appropriate (not 9/11 alternative theories) #See also to that article.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit War over 9/11 alternative theories 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Global Guardian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100807204647/http://www.gpoaccess.gov//911/index.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Global Guardian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041027123040/https://afweather.afwa.af.mil/observer/JUL_AUG_2002/rsrvart.html to https://afweather.afwa.af.mil/observer/JUL_AUG_2002/rsrvart.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050210080218/http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html to http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a012802.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050218012511/http://www.newhousenews.com/index.html to http://www.newhousenews.com/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041221214123/http://www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/russia/weapons/bombers/bombdevs.htm to http://www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/russia/weapons/bombers/bombdevs.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified