Talk:Richard Carew (antiquary)

message: :Image:The Survey of Cornwall.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:The Survey of Cornwall.jpg

message: The current chat over whether Carew should be described as English, British or Cornish is interesting. I looked at some of the sources. There is one which describes him as a Cornish gentlemen who is 'a lover of his country', which I would take to mean England, given the context? I looked at Carew's last work, ‘The Excellency of the English tongue,' which was written  as a rebuttal and an affirmation of English, English culture/England.Halbared (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe that description is referring to Richard Carew, if you mean the review of Rowse's  Court and Country.  Tewdar  23:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Yeah, that's referring to Robert Trencreek (Rowse, p. 146)  Tewdar  08:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the clarification and help there.Halbared (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The biography of Richard Carew in the Rowse book is extremely useful. I'm planning on making some improvements to this article in the medium-future.  Tewdar  09:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Tewdar in your recent quote from Carew's Survey of Cornwall:  country may refer to  rather than a nation. See https://www.shakespeareswords.com/Public/Glossary.aspx as Carew was a contemporary of Shakespeare. TSventon (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, but however you slice the Tesen Hevva, he is talking here about  and describing them as , or at least this is how I interpret it. I have no idea whether this means Carew 'thought of himself as Cornish', which is why I prefer to base this sort of thing on (the majority of) modern-ish reliable sources. Perhaps I can yet find a more explicit quotation from Carew himself.  Tewdar  19:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And look at what we get for 'countryman':  🤔  Tewdar  19:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I did see 'countryman'. The glossary is a list of words that are used with non-modern meanings, so country may well sometimes have been used in its modern sense. TSventon (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: The Excellency of the English tongue

message: Carew was orginally described in the lead without any nationality/ethnicity, merely noting he was from Cornwall. However in this edit ,  changed that to say he is Cornish. This was February 2018. This was changed boldly 4 and a half years later by an editor I won't ping in as they are banned  (November 2022). Two edits, but a year an a half later an IP put it back to Cornish. This was reverted.  more recently tried the same and was reverted despite mentioning sources. Then, today,  boldly changed it to English, with an edsum "fixed lead".
Now, MOS:NATIONALITY AKA WP:ETHNICITY addresses UK nationalities in note a. It reads: The status quo for the longest period was clearly "Cornish", but the note above does not specifically mention Cornish. The change to British was bold on a low traffic page, and went unchallenged for some time but just 2 edits later was reverted. So I have reverted to the status quo, and now I think we need to do as the note says and come to a decision on which is best. I note some discussion above. I don't see a consensus for British, English or Cornish. And Cornish is acceptable if that is what the sources say. Although not being listed in our note, there are claims to Cornish nationality based on linguistic and cultural factors that would be just as appropriate as for Welsh or Scottish. So MOS:NATIONALITY applies and now we need to review the sources. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with Cornish. I changed it from British to English because they were in the 16/17th century, when british isn't really a thing. I think given what you've written Cornish makes the most sense. Mason (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Also in case it is helpful. Here are the cites from the edit exchange. Mason (talk) 13:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: First, just for the record, it wasn't me who introduced "Cornish" in 2018: it was actually introduced in this edit of 2005, and (on a quick review) remained unchallenged until 2022. Having said that, I'm also fine with it. It's not really being used here as an ethnicity/nationality, but as a defining characteristic: Carew wasn't just an antiquary who happened to be from Cornwall, he is so closely associated with Cornwall that it would be ludicrous to omit this from the lead sentence and short description. The only real counterargument to my mind is that some (non-British) readers may not know what "Cornish" means, and if people feel strongly about that we could perhaps consider a reword that includes both "English" and "Cornwall/Cornish". GrindtXX (talk) 15:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, yes, I misread that edit. 2005 it is. I agree with the above too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 00:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality