Talk:List of fictional characters within The Simpsons

message: Do Hugo and Kang & Kodos really count as fictional characters within The Simpsons? Since they are from Halloween episodes, they seem to be outside the Simpsons universe, if anywhere. Tregoweth 03:21, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)
:Are we sure that they're only in the Halloween episodes? I have a vague feeling that that's not true.
::Kang and Kodos have appeared in clip shows, but those are also outside of normal series continuity. Tregoweth 07:24, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
:Other characters (such as Hugo) also only appear in Halloween episodes. Should we really include these? -Branddobbe 02:27, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)
I think halloween-only characters (and malibu stacy) have no place here, this is for fictional -characters- that the simpsons know about and consider to be fictional. until kang and kodos get their own show or malibu stacy gets her own cartoon, i'd get rid of them.
:A character is not an entity with its own show. Plus, I think it's appropriate here, especially given the header of the Article. Out-of-continuity characters are still in The Simpsons universe, since they're on the show The Simpsons. Consider the Treehouse of Horror episodes to be stories that are fictional to the Simpsons' characters themselves, and therefore fictional fictional characters Fitch 20:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kang and Kodos]]

message: shouldn't this quote: "Abortion for some, American flags for the others" be "Abortion for some, American flags for All!"?
*I belive the actual quote is "Abortions for some, tiny American flags for others." Jack Cain 01:48, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abortion for some, American flags for the others 

message: Doesn't Smithers have the largest collection of Malibu Stacy dolls in the world?  RickK 10:02, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
:Yes as revealed in Lisa vs. Malibu Stacy--220.238.88.213 02:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Malibu Stacy

message: There's a kid called Billy. He's in documentaries with Troy McClure, like the one with D.N.A. and there's another one where Lisa becomes a vegetarian. Should he be placed in Fictional characters within The Simpsons or List of recurring characters from The Simpsons or not be placed anywhere? He's definitely been in at least two episodes. APclark 10:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he is as real as Troy McClure is.--220.238.88.213 02:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Billy

message: 220.238.88.213 02:48, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Bumblebeeman should count.--Greasysteve13 04:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duffman, Menthol Moose, The Seven Duffs? What about Bumblebee Man then?  

message: How about poor Old Gil?? Put in a good word for your buddy Gil.. the wolves are at Old Gil's door...  oh boy, your whole life you work and you slave and scrimp and you steal just enough to get a sweet, sweet lick of that shiny brass ring. Where's Gil's lick, doesn't Old Gil get a lick?
*(Old Gil is the white male in his 50s who appears as a very poor salesman, always apparently down on his luck and desperate to make a sale. This Simpson's character is based on Jack Lemmon's character in the film 'Glengarry Glen Ross')
Dirk Diggler Jnr 12:07, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're looking at the wrong list. See [[List of recurring characters from The Simpsons]#Gil]]. Now, lets talk rust-proofing. The Coleco will rust up on you like that! Shut up, Gil, close the deal!. smurrayinchester(User), (Ho Ho Ho!) 18:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Old Gil]]

message: Why should God be listed as a fictional Simpsons character?  He isn't A Simpsons character, and listing him as fictional may offend lots of Christians.--68.170.86.111 21:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not just Christians as you'll see in this article: "God"--Greasysteve13 04:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

text: From the article, "Homer states that God was his "absolute favorite science-fiction character"." Therefore in the Simpsons universe, God is a fictional character. --JimmyTheWig 10:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But God did appear on one episode, when Homer thought the end times were comming, and he went to heaven.  Also, just Homer said he is a Science fiction Character.  That doesn't make it necesarily true.--68.170.86.111 22:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I thought Bart said, "Woah, God is so in-your-face!" to which homer replied, "Yeah he's my favourite fictional character too"--Greasysteve13 06:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  God??? 

message: Are one-time characters or fictional characters that already appear in other cartoons regularly really necessary for this article? ☺ -- The pathetic APclark Be nice not nasty 17:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this should be fictional characters from within the Simpsons universe... Duffman, Malibou Stacey, etc. should be here... Big bird, Oscar, et al. should be removed... also, if I remember the episode correctly, those characters were not named, but were rather Simpsons universe rip-offs... maybe one entry on this list for the whole lot of them as a 'Sesame Street rip-off show' on The Simpsons... - Adolphus79 04:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-time Characters 

message: McGonigle
Often incorrecly referred to as "McGarnagle", DVD subtitles show the characters name to be McGonigle.
---
Are DVD subtitles canon now? You'd have to be deaf to not hear the "R" sound in his name. Tromboneguy0186 02:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  McGarnigle 

message: Shouldn't there be a distinction between fictional characters created by the Simpsons writers (Fallout Boy, Mr. Sparkle, etc.) and previously-existing characters created by others (Big Bird, Spongebob, etc.)? 71.111.59.22 15:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters from non-Simpsons sources 

message: Should we put Peter and Stan, Kyle and Cartman in this? I mean they apperared in some episodes.(68.192.242.97 01:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Griffin and the South Park Kids

message: :Image:Hatmalibustacy.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hatmalibustacy.gif

message: Wasn't there an episode where they were casting someone to play fallout boy in movies or promotions or something, and Bart or Milton or someone was chosen.  Or maybe I dreamed that... 128.117.194.163 19:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it wasn't a dream: Radioactive Man (The Simpsons episode). In the future, though, please do not use the article talk pages as a forum, use this only for improving the article. An excellent Simpsons forum can be found at Nohomers.net. Thank you. --WillMak050389 19:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallout boy 

message: Happy Little Elves redirects here, but there's no mention of it on the page. What happened to them?121.45.251.111 05:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happy Little Elves 

message: Should Sesame Street characters i.e. Big Bird, Elmo, Oscar the Grouch be included in this list?
They do have a physical presence in the real world, albeit as puppets, whereas all the other characters in the list are truly fictional with no physical presence outside The Simpsons universe. Ozzieboy 10:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sesame Street characters 

message: :Image:Fallout-boy.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fallout-boy.png

message: Death is not a fictional character within The Simpsons. We should move him to the List of one-time characters or the List of recurring characters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.91.27 (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: I think Jack Bauer should be on this list. What do you think? RMFan1 (talk) 17:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jack Bauer

message: :Image:Amendment to be.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amendment to be.jpg

message: There is no explaination why the image of Bender's first appearance in is here.  It's completely out of context.  Either the caption should be improved or the image should be removed -Verdatum (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bender image 

message: Fallout Boy Already got its own, more detailed section in the Radioactive Man article, I suggest the part in this article be replaced with a link.
200.105.168.7 (talk) 01:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fallout boy