Talk:Buizel

message: Where did the name Buoisel come from? I thought it was that other japanese name... Toastypk 19:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that this romanization, like Parrap, is original research. That is, I have found absolutely no source to confirm either of these spellings as authentic, unlike Lucario and Manaphy which were confirmed by trademark filings and, in the former's case, various publications and merchandise. Wonk619 14:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The names Buoisel and Parrap were not confirmed, but there's a 99% percent chance that these are the original names like Lucario and Manaphy, as these names are valid romanizations and make sense in reference to the Pokemon - Perappu = Parrapu (Parrot) and the "u" in the end is always an additive. ErezR 15:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While those names may be logical ones, the official spellings may be slightly different (ex: Buoysel, Parrup). Therefore, until there are confirmed official romanizations, I suggest that these articles be left as Buizeru and Perappu. Wonk619 01:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now the name was changed again. I'm thinking someone needs to look at this and find the real name ASAP. Toastypk 22:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to Pokémon Center Online, Buoysel is the "real" name. Wonk619 00:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Like with Parrap, I question the rationale behind the original deletion of this. The words "suspected hoax" were added to Parrap's page when it was re-created in the poorly-formatted deletion tags, but this is an official Nintendo site that includes the image. --HeroicJay 08:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put the deletion tag there in accordance with  Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves, because the article was improperly moved via cut and paste from the correct title, Buizeru. Wonk619 14:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: It [the name] could still change.  Look at what happened with Snubbull.  It went through an entire mini-movie with the wrong name.
Almighty Rajah 23:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It could still change 

message: I'm getting really annoyed as to who keep changing Ash catching Buizel to Dawn catching it. It's Ash who catches it already!
::It is currently unknown who will catch it. All we know is that SOMEONE will be catching it, as it's with them in a trailer for the movie. Lets just change it to it will appear in whatever episode. This appears to be the only way without speculating. -Sukecchi 18:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See? This is why you don't speculate. Clearly you were wrong, as it was Dawn who caught Buizel. -Sukecchi 19:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dawn or Ash

message: As Buoysel is confirmed to be #56 in the SHinou Pokédex, I have added it as #442 in the National Pokédex. However, I do realise that there may be some Kanto/Johto/Hoenn Pokémon before it, so feel free to change it. Double Dash 15:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've removed it. We don't yet know that the Shinou Pokédex will continue from the end of the National one, or that the Nat'l dex will even appear in D&P. Please don't add supposition, even if it seems logical on the surface. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 15:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Dex: 442 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support. Putting the Japanese Romanization above an English name, even if it is later changed, is ridiculous. This wasn't controversial, and the "controversy" would have never been brought up if the redirect didn't have history. ' 19:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support. Putting the Japanese Romanization above an English name, even if it is later changed, is ridiculous. This wasn't controversial, and the "controversy" would have never been brought up if the redirect didn't have history. ' 19:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move