lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nanoindentation

message: Not totally sure on what exactly happened with the companies, but the Nano indenter(tm) II was produced by Nano instruments, Inc, P.O. Box 14211 Knoxville, Tennessee 37914 and I seem to recall them being bought out by MTS which is why they now own the continuous stiffness system and their special lock in amplifier they use to drive said system.
Also note that you don't get "different" hardness values.  Both indentation techniques (nano and macro) are the same basically, it's just that a typical macro intendation is calibrated to indent and back out the the hardness at the maximal load applied, whereas some of the nano systems use a method by which they can back out this same hardness value while performing the indentation.
It depends on how you calculate the indentation, whether you use a projected area or consider the elastic recovery. This could give you a different 'hardness'. Also, as microhardness values give Vickers hardness values, this can also give you a 'different' value, as the geometry/load will measure a different 'hardness'. - BenBritton  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.84.73 (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I think the use of the projected contact area for calculating the Martens hardness HM is not correct.
According to ISO 14577 the area As must be used: HM = Pmax / As
However, Ap is used for the Indentation hardness: H_IT = Pmax / Ap
Dont mix up these two area and two hardness definitions!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.63.51.151 (talk) 07:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  projected contact area for Martens hardness? 
Talk:Deliblatska Peščara

message: Deliblato Sands (#2, #3).--Zoupan 03:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Preševo Valley

message: Presevo has nothing to do with South Serbia. South Serbia is Serbian Kosovo! --Србија до Токија (talk) 12:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Serbia 

message: It should be noted that term "Presevo valley" is political term, invented by Albanian politicians in South Serbia, with idea to represent that part as unique and distinctive from South Serbia. This same tactics is used to represents Kosovo as distinctive part from Serbia. Bujanovac is bigger than Preshevo, but Preshevo has Albanian majority. Also, in Serbia, valleys doesn't bear the names of towns or other settlements. 85.222.163.250 (talk) 10:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of term 

message: I don't know how to fix this infobox added in. So here it is. Fences and windows (talk) 11:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken infobox

message: The entire introduction to the article is bold for no apparent reason. The editing interface says there is nothing there to make it bold. Can this be investigated? 216.137.192.89 (talk) 02:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thanks; my bad. It was a mixture of (non-)italics within  which broke the formatting. No such user (talk) 14:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary bolding 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  03:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:1996–1997 Serbian protests

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved after discounting the sockpuppetry and the alternate move proposal against which goes against WP:NCEVENT criteria (closed by non-admin page mover) — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 19:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 1996–1997 protests in Serbia →  – It’s a more correct-sounding title. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Blocked sock. S.L. 17:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 August 2023
Talk:Sten Odenwald

message: From the creator of the article's name being Odenwald, and the terms such as "my websites", along with facts that are things that would likely be known only by the subject (and not relevant to the article, such as insect collections, memories of early childhood, etc.) I have placed the COI tag at the top, as it would appear that the article was created by its subject. I have started the process of cleaning up this article in accordance with the manual of style, and biographies of living persons. I have left a message for the editor in question, especially with concerns of the conflict of interest when a subject creates an autobiography, and it is my hope that this will not become an issue, but rather the editor will come here to discuss issues, and assist other neutral, third-party editors in building this article, as it is seems to me, to satisfy notability requirements. However, a significant portion of the article is commentary on things that are not ultimately relevant, and will need to be trimmed. Any and all help is appreciated! Ariel♥Gold 21:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2007
Talk:Great Migrations of the Serbs

message: @Saintstephen000, before any further discussion, provide explanation for reinserting a sentence with such a poor semantics like: 
"The masses of earlier migrations from the Ottoman Empire are considered ethnically Serb, and those of the First Great Migration nationally Serb." Bbbgsr (talk) 23:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saintstephen000 - explanation for edits required  

message: @Saintstephen000, provide explanation for why would an article on Migrations of Serbs, have the whole summary dealing with the topic of Kosovo always being an Albanian land ? Next to this missing the logical structure completely, it is also very unbiased and scientifically unethical.
Why do you keep reverting "Modern Analysis" section? Provide justification for the motives.
I will push this to the end and revert as many times as needed, but before that I am patiently waiting for your explanation to understand this. Political agitations of this type are highly prohibited and unethical ! Bbbgsr (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very problematic author's motives !  

message: Should Pietro Bogdani be added as a source, regarding the ethnic composition of Kosovo in 1685, especially because he was heavily involved with the Austrian war efforts in conquering Kosovo? ShockedSkater (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No because it is a source from 1685. also this is a page about Serb migration not about different theories about ethnic composition of Kosovo. WP:Coatrack and  WP:AGEMATTERS  Theonewithreason (talk) 19:03, 02 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So, you think that the statements from Arsenije, von Kollonitsch and Stefan of Ravanica do not belong here, because of the time they were written? ShockedSkater (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogdani as a source 

message: This article is about Serb migrations and should include information about that, not about Albanian toponyms in Kosovo, Albanian population in Prizren etc. There are other articles dealing with thatTheonewithreason (talk) 08:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP COATRACK
Talk:Residents Against SARP Pollution

message: Nice article. Probably being dumb, but I don't get this bit:
"with the local council looking at siting recycling processes on the site"
Does it perhaps mean "re-siting" (if that's the right spelling) as per moving recycling elsewhere, e.g. total closure? Or does it mean moving other or new recycling processes onto the site? e.g. was the council sympathetic or moving against SARP?
Andysoh 21:24, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It means moving other (non-toxic) recycling process onto the site. Votemoose 16:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Little Entente

message: If you do a search on "Hungarian revision," you will see that the first sentence of this article is an unattributed quote from the book, "Facts 101, Europe in the Twentieth Century."   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.36.159.69 (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

message: Where is the rest of the article that used to exist detailing the breakdown of the Little Entente in the latter half of the 1930s>  --Sephiroth9611 (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decline of the Little Entente
Talk:Battle of Rhone Crossing

message: Most remarkable article. However it need a consistency check, especially of the formatting but also of some of the content - got the right persons for those equivocal Roman names? On the formatting, we need "cite" templates on those notes - dates - (give full cites) and Lazenby appears a few times with different ISBN's - needs systematization. Also I note there are no refs to primary sources. And, some of the refs are still in parenthetical form. The content looks good and there are some nice pics. Attention to these fine points makes the diff between a top article and a sloppy one. Time is not of the essence so take some.Dave (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency check

message: Because the current title isn't grammatical in my dialect, and probably isn't grammatical in most dialects of English. 96.231.17.143 (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Souldn't this be the Battle of ''The'' Rhone or the Battle of ''The'' Rhone Crossing? 

message: , your recent edits introduced a couple dozen referencing errors to the article. I've fixed many, but I would appreciate your help in cleaning up the rest of the errors. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to help! :) There are still six more to fix. -- Mikeblas (talk) 05:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing problems
Talk:Captain Nemo (comics)

message: Are there any plans for a sequel?-August 29 2007, Dreap
Plans for the sequel can be seen on the publisher's website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.32.135 (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel

message: review. 
Gabriel Yuji (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review
Talk:Serbian-Jewish Friendship Society

message: This society served a nationalistic agenda during the Balkan Wars.I have provided few international links and a serbian democratic media link that deal with the case of Ankica Konjuh.The society intentionally used her in a propaganda sceam to demonize Croats.I think it's very important that her name and her case are mentioned.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 13:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone ereased the facts on this article
Talk:Good news

message: Removing "What the liberal media..." -- it's pretty far from being unbiased.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.75.123.135 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 29 August 2007 
:Good catch, that was certainly an uneeded entry--Hu12 23:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Did I overlook the spiritual "Good News", or is it missing? --User:Haraldmmueller 20:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spiritual?
Talk:Adipocere

message: I tried to add a citation for  for the 100 years quote, since it appears to be taken directly from this source, almost word for word.  However, I really don't know how to write references and I didn't do it right.  Could someone fix it?--Drkslvr (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

message: This month's Archaeology magazine describes a cask of milk found in Ireland that has aged into waxy 'adipocere'.    Beadtot  64.136.26.230 (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  other uses of 'adipocere' term 

message: Is it edible? Can we get some nutritional values for this in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.226.5.206 (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edible 

message: I have come across an article entitled "Adipocere: What is known after over two centuries of research" published in Forensic Science International (2011) that can be used to considerably improve the Wikipedia entry on Adipocere. Please consider it.
Link: http://www.pawsoflife.org/Library/HRD/Ubelaker_2011.pdf
Ninioelninio (talk) 15:49, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  new material to consider 

message: It would be nice to have a summary of the composition, and list of potential (or past) applications.  I remember reading some time back about its use in medieval France for soap and candle making, I think.  Macabre, but it's only chemistry, afterall :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.128.192 (talk) 01:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical composition, applications 

message: Statement 1:
"(...) or a body in a warm environment is unlikely to form deposits of adipocere."
Statement 2:
"It is accelerated by warmth, but temperature extremes impede it" 186.226.127.69 (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing/inconsistent statements
Talk:Ibar (river)

message: The Central Serbia article suggests that it was not even an administrative division, and in any case it no longer exists. In that case it would be silly to link to it when Serbia is a more accurate and more neutral target. bobrayner (talk) 22:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central serbia 
Talk:Miriam Rodón Naveira

message: If the subject of this article is the daughter of Puerto Rico's first female Chief Justice, Miriam Naveira (formerly "de Rodón"), the fact should be noted in herr mother's page or this article, or both. Pr4ever (talk) 04:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother 

message: The lead says she "has been covered by books and magazines as a...". Instead of mentioning sources, shouldn't the article describe the subject and its accomplishments just using the sources as references? --damiens.rf 16:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioning the sources in the prose 

message: It regard to the edits made by User:130.134.87.186 her mention in the book "El Boricuazo" is due to the information obtained from this article, which I authored ("created" to be more specific), and not as result of any original research made by the author of the book. Therefore, what the book is really citing is Wikipedia. It must also be noted that any changes and/or updates to this article must be cited and accompanied by reliable verifiable sources as required by the established policies of Wikipedia, otherwise said additions will be removed. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "El Boricuazo"
Talk:Canfield Casino and Congress Park

message: The postcard collection I have has these four views of the park.  (There are none of the club or casino.)  Any opinions as to which one should be in the info box? Parkerdr 22:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice of images

message: Before my recent edit, the text stated "In 1883, Richard Albert Canfield took a partnership in the Saratoga Clubhouse, and bought it outright the following year for $250,000." However, the  US National Register of Historic Places gives the date of purchase by  Canfield as 1894 and this is also confirmed by other Saratoga sources. So I've changed the date of purchase and removed "the following year", since 1894 is not the year after 1883. This all suggests that the date of Canfield's first involvement might have been 1893 not 1883. Bermicourt (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now resolved. The source appears to be “Preservation Matters” Strolling Through History: Canfield Casino at saratogapreservation.org. Bermicourt (talk) 18:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Richard Canfield's involvement
Talk:Omnibus law (Serbia)

message: ==  Proposed deletion of :Omnibus law ==
The article :Omnibus law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
refimprovBetter references are needed, else the article is unsubstantiated.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 16:50, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion
Template talk:S-npo

message: Someone apparently shoved Freemasonry in here under the npo template, and the title is ungrammatical.  I'd rather it read "Masonic offices", but the template won't let me edit it, and it seems to keep kicking me from one page to another. MSJapan (talk) 01:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This template is not protected, so you should be able to edit it. This seems reasonable, so I have made the change. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  12:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Masonic offices are not really important enough to merit a Succession box... so I have simply removed it from the list. Blueboar (talk) 13:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Need a change
Talk:Windstorm inspection

message: I got a windstorm inspection and saw there was no article for it.  The State of Florida is spending $250 million on free inspections and shutters (www.mysafefloridahome.com)  68.213.217.114 21:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but we need sources to verify what you write. Realkyhick 07:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needed

message: Windloss Inspection inspection should be merged with windstorm inspection.  Both are stubs, both are orphans, neither cites references, and they are talking about inspecting for homes for storms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slaporte (talk • contribs) 05:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Montbéliarde

message: Right now the characteristics section only shows some vague numbers.
Are these minimum values, maximum values, average values, or target values for breeders, or what?
If anyone has more info, please make the section a little more specific. Greetings, RagingR2 21:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Characteristics

message: I removed one claim from the "usage" section (something about Montbeliard beeing the best breed so and so on (see history). If information like that is to be added, there has to be some citation/validation for it.
And while we're at it: the same goes for the sentence that is still there: "The old cows and calves are selled more expensive than holstein cattle." More expensive? Come up with some verifiable figures please! I only left this one in because I didn't want to erase the whole section. So if anyone has more (verifiable) info, please add! Greetings, RagingR2 21:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for claims 
Talk:The Night the Cylons Landed

message: I’d like to know who believes this episode is excessively long and why you believe I am not citing sources.  First of all, the article is no more weighty than my previous Galactica 1980 summaries.  Secondly, all information pertaining to this article comes directly from the episodes in question.  If you can prove that any of this information is false then I challenge you to do so.
:What the first tag actually says is "This article or section contains a plot summary that is overly long or excessively detailed compared to the rest of the article." Please read WP:PLOT for more information about the need for reliable third party sources. Pairadox 22:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: QUESTION
Talk:Austro-Prussian rivalry

message: Meanwhile, why is there a picture of two statues in Japan as the page image? Brickie (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Soft consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 17:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Austria–Prussia rivalry →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME (ngrams and Google Scholar for Austro-Prussian and Austria-Prussia), and for consistency with Austro-Prussian War. BilledMammal (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 February 2022
Talk:Texel

message: The reason that I read for the pronunciation of Texel as Tessel is that Texel was originally a Frisian island, and Texel is a Frisian name. However, all X sounds in Dutch got replaced with S sounds (compare English/German/Dutch Fox/Fuchs/Vos, Wax/Wachs/Was, Six/Sechs/Zes etc). So "Tessel" would just be the standard Dutch pronunciation of the Frisian Texel.
Pemboid (talk) 21:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now found a reference that backs this up, and so will edit the introduction. Pemboid (talk) 15:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm based on Texel and can only confirm here they say "TeSSel", not "TeKSel". /out  Qwrk (talk) 00:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because Frisian has died out on Texel, and so everyone speaks Dutch. However, I know people from West Friesland who still pronounce it Teksel. Pemboid (talk) 20:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  X to SS 

message: Recently the island has had a mock declaration of independence as the "Vrije Republiek Tessel", may be worth adding. 185.61.55.68 (talk) 14:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on the declaration of the Free Republic of Tessel?
Talk:Ludwigstraße

message: Since the "Rechtschreibreform"/ the orthography-change, think 80% of the germans it doesnot matter how someone writes words. BUT there are still rules! It means Straße, though it means Ludwigsstraße. Because the A is long, you have to write a ß! If the A should be short like in nass(wet), you should write two s. It is very logical! Greetings from Munich --93.104.183.127 (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthography