Talk:Gulf of Bothnia

message: Is this really relevant? It's not specific to the G of B at all. The reference to world discoveries by the Portuguese seems particularly out of place to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panpaniscus (talk • contribs) 23:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Orientation of Maps

message: Some historians consider Ottar refer to Gulf of Bothnia when he uses Cwen sea (9th c.). It is possible too that Claussön's usage Mare Gotticus (15th c.) refers to Gulf of Bothnia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rogper (talk • contribs) 16:37, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then you could include that in the article. :) - ulayiti (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ottar and Orosius

message: Hello 4th avenue, I found your changes somewhat confusing, and I was confused, especially after seeing your bad joke comment, which someone was kind enough to remove. I took you for an editor rather than a vandal. On careful study of the changes you were attempting to make I think I see what you were trying to do. It is in fact what I was hoping someone would do, supply additional possibilities and information. Nobody seems to want to change the text so I did it.
You did not support your ideas in the text. I presume from your joke that you know a great deal about the subject and were just going to enlighten us when you got tired, as the typos indicate. I suggest you take the opportunity now. What language still had the thorn in the botten? What do the Swedish etymological dictionaries say? I wish I knew some Swedish. I presume you must know some; you speak as though you do. I look forward to being further educated by your next revision of the article. Dave 06:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The only source in the section about the name, an etymological dictionary
from 1922, does not support any of the claims in that section. Yes, there is a paragraph in the source where it says that "botten" comes from "botn" which is related to English word "bottom". But on the same page of this etymological dictionary, there also is a paragraph on the actual topic of this article... which goes
"Bottenhavet, Bottniska viken (t. ex.
Dalin 1747), förr Botn(en), till fsv. botn
i betyd, ’vik’ (jfr isl. fjarðarbotn
ävensom förf. Sjön. 1: 118 t.); samma ord
som föreg. Härtill Norr-, Väster- o.
Österbotten."
I'm not a linguist and this is also slightly oldfashioned language... but the meaning of it is something like this
"Bottenhavet (the Bothnian Sea), Bottniska viken (the Gulf of Bothnia), older versions of the name are Botn or Botnen. From old Swedish word botn, which has several meanings but the one relevant here is ’gulf’ or ’bay’."
Then the text is comparing with an Icelandic word, and in the end it says that the names Norrbotten, Västerbotten and Österbotten are derived from Bottenhavet/Bottniska viken.
I've corrected the beginning of the article section accordingly. However, the whole section about the name contains various unsourced statments saying completely different things. There might be better sources than this etymological dictionary from 1922, but since this is the only sourced information we have probably the rest of the paragraph should just be removed. I'll put "source needed"-tags on it for now. --83.189.149.109 (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources regarding the name 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gulf of Bothnia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070310224415/http://www.ku.lt:80/nemo/bot_lag_desc.html to http://www.ku.lt/nemo/bot_lag_desc.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151201223529/http://portal.fma.fi/portal/page/portal/55478A4150A57C60E040B40A0A0174A8 to http://portal.fma.fi/portal/page/portal/55478A4150A57C60E040B40A0A0174A8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gulf of Bothnia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005023046/http://www.swedishlapland.com/en/Bottenvikens-skargard/info/Information/ to http://www.swedishlapland.com/en/Bottenvikens-skargard/info/Information/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gulf_of_Bothnia&type=revision&diff=822570592&oldid=822570075, what is the difference between"Perämeren erityispiirteitä" and"Perämeren erityispiirteet" --NoToleranceForIntolerance (talk) 04:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The word (erityis)piirteitä is in the partitive case, i.e. "Perämeren erityispiirteet" can be translated to "The special features of the Bothnian Bay" and "Perämeren erityispiirteitä" can be translated to "Some special features of the Bothnian Bay". --JAAqqO (talk) 21:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I wonder