Talk:General Electric LM6000

message: I'm pretty sure Sprint is a GE trademark as is LM6000.  What's the Wikipedia policy on that?    Has SMEC really become that popular of an option that it warrants mentioning?  Why do these particular options matter more than other options like VIGV, steam injection, DLE, etc.?  Also, I was under the impression that water injection was not for efficiency, but for NOx reduction.  In fact, in the four years that I worked engineering LM6000 packages, we always called it "NOx water."  --W0lfie 16:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure which options are the most important, but I think your additions are a good start.  I might take a crack at fleshing it out a bit after I make some additions to the pipe organ articles I'm working on.  :-)  --W0lfie 19:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not intimately familiar with the LM6000 in particular, but for most aircraft and aeroderived engines, the two spools rotate on separate bearings and are only linked aerodynamically... Georgewilliamherbert 00:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct. --W0lfie (talk) 03:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

text: ooh I love the oil one.  it's so complicated looking.  ;-)  But I'm glad we have the air one up. --W0lfie (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sprint and other options

message: :Image:Lm6000-2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lm6000-2.png

message: :Image:Lm6000-2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Man, I haven't seen that in ages.  Would it be worth adding a paragraph to the article explaining the whole PC/PD (Dry low emissions) thing?  It would help explain the odd asymmetry of the image. --W0lfie (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lm6000-2.png

message: I only know about the GTG side of LM6000s.  So I'm afraid most of my contributions are centered on that use, rather than aviation.  Is that misleading that the article focuses more on land units?  Should we add more about its us on airplanes? --W0lfie (talk) 03:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balanced? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on General Electric LM6000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150905141815/http://www.geaviation.com/engines/docs/marine/datasheet-lm6000.pdf to http://www.geaviation.com/engines/docs/marine/datasheet-lm6000.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified