Talk:Susanna Centlivre

message: Hello again! I'd like to include information (in no particular order) from the DNB in a slightly revised version of the entry:
- Centlivre had two biographers who disagreed on some points (a brief outline of the disagreement would be an interesting addition to a "biography" section)
- Centlivre remained consistently popular for 150 years after her death (perhaps a statement that some authors "claim" that she was 
one of the most popular playwrights of her age could also be added?_
- Centlivre was best known for her comedies (see Geogre's comment above)
I think that categorical divisions are useful as well. Biography (early life/marriage), Plays, and Contemporary Reception might be useful headers. 
Any thoughts? Eh Elle Dee 16:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold in updating pages, Eh Elle Dee. Feel free to edit. Bishonen | talk 16:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello

message: Omitted “Abel Boyer gives no opinion on this matter” because there seems to be no direct connection previously established in the paragraph. In addition, it is obscure in terms of which line it applies to (the previous or post). Smdaniels (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Added an image and made a few small edits. This is shaping up nicely! — scribblingwoman 13:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I've never done this before, so if i am doing something wrong in my execution, i apologize. I wanted to point out that the line "The Gamester and The Basset Table were great theatrical successes" is false. The Basset Table only ran for four nights and was never revived, according to http://www.litencyc.com/php/sworks.php?rec=true&UID=9997.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.2.175.87 (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complaint 

message: Does anyone understand the point being made in the final section, following on from the (sub-title?) "Critical Note"? It doesn't make a lot of sense to me, and detracts somewhat from the rest of the article, but I may be missing some essential context.
Hchc2009 (talk) 10:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it isn't referenced, is only partially related to the rest of the article and reads like original research, I'll remove the section concerned. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone understand the Critical Note bit? 

message: This article is still short on in-line references.  Also the WP:LEAD section does not give an overview of the entire article and instead introduces some unique material that should be transferred to the body and referenced properly.  Please click on WP:LEAD.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that many references are missing in the article (where it says "citation needed").  Information that remains unreferenced must, unfortunately, be deleted.  Please read these important policies:  WP:V and WP:OR.  Thanks!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article advancement

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Susanna Centlivre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927195827/http://www.juggernaut-theatre.org/first100years/centlivrebio.html to http://www.juggernaut-theatre.org/first100years/centlivrebio.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified