lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Komatsuhime

message: The historical description seems considerably different from the one written in Japanese Wikipedia.--ComSpex 21:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whoever's been changing her name to "Ina," please stop. Her adult name was Komatsu, and the Japanese article is titled "Komatsuhime," so please keep it that way. If you're approaching this article from the standpoint of the game, I'd like to ask that you keep in mind that this article is not just for the video game, but also for Komatsuhime the real person. -Tadakuni 14:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: Does anyone know of a portrait we could use for this article that isn't from anime or video games? Asarelah (talk) 19:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrait
Talk:Angel Blade

message: Both articles are stubs, and Angel Blade Punish is a sub-stub.  There's no real need for a second article, at least at this time.  Punish is just a continuation of the first OVA series, no? 
;Support
#Snarfies 15:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Per above vote, the deed is done. Snarfies 15:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: I will now be improving this article greatly, but is it really possible for this to be a good article?Angelofdeath275 02:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article still needs the plot of the film. -- FrostytheSnowman 'sup? 23:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting entire article

message: I just wanted to point out that Angel Blade looks similar to a "cleaner" anime called Witchblade.
Should there be a notice in this article? Superjustinbros. (talk) 23:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick Statement
Talk:Comephorus

message: I'm not an ichthyologist, nor do I speak Russian. Heck, I know nothing about fish. However, I figured this poor fish deserved some attention. Could someone put together an infobox and check my facts? I'm really not certain about everything in the article, and I'm not sure I understood all of my references. Thank you! Captainktainer * Talk 21:16, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, same here, unfortunately. I just added a new reference (the ScienceDirect one), but I can only read the abstract. I'm confused by how the lipid content is divided up into body, muscles and liver, and am unsure about my use of the term "body weight" which might be taken to refer to the whole fish. Also according to that source, Comephorus dybowski has much less oil content than baicalensis, which puzzles me - does it live as deep? Does it melt in the sun? Is it really similar? I don't know. Card Zero (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References, help

message: In a previous edition it was written "Golomyanka (lit. fat fish)".
In russian zhir fat
/riba fish, (hence Рыбий жир Cod liver oil). Golomya means nude, naked. Michalis Melidonis (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fish name meaning
Talk:Lambert Lombard

message: First he was named a Dutch painter, then Flemish, then someone removed both ánd the category with edit summary "he was not from the nederland, nor from flanders." First of all, if you remove a category because of nationality issues, there is always a generic category that you can use so the poor man is not left without a category. I've put him under :Category:Painters; you will find that there are actually no painters in that category, they are all moved to a category by nationality.
Concerning the nationality issue, I always assumed Liège was a part of the (Medieval) Netherlands but I checked, and the Bishopric of Liège was indeed not a part of the Seventeen Provinces or the Southern Netherlands. It was never ruled by the Dukes of Burgundy, the Spanish Empire or the Habsburgs. On the other hand, the Bishopric was surrounded by territories that were a part of Netherlands.
If we want to give him a non-Netherlandish nationality then it would probably be German as the Prince-Bishopric was a German state and part of the Holy Roman Empire. Somehow I think after the events of August 1914 the people of Liége would prefer not to be called Germans, so I'll leave it as it is. I think culturally he belongs in :Category:Flemish painters because of his connections to Jan Gossaert. But I'll leave it as it is for now, although I think he should not stay in the generic Painter category. Always difficult to put people in nationality categories if the nations did not exist when they lived, check the eternal discussion on Nicolaus Copernicus' nationality. Piet 21:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made him Flemish again, in accordance to the second link. Piet 14:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Hampton Fancher

message: ...definitely needs work. Will Fancher be forever remembered as a former actor? Jonathan F 21:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Talk:Pudge Heffelfinger

message: I changed football to soccer as if hes a US player then soccer is a more appropriate word than the british word football.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluestreek (talk • contribs) 21:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He played American football, not soccer. Changed back. 75.22.239.165 20:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I apparently struck the enter key accidently, and saved the explanation of my 2018-09-30 edit before I finished it.  This is what shows: "17:01, 30 September 2018‎ Paugus (talk | contribs)‎ . . (20,359 bytes) (-384)‎ . . (→‎First professional football player: I eliminated an entire paragraph which was self contradictory, offered no non-supporting references not supported by the link to another Wikipedia page.) (undo)"
What I intended to say was: "I eliminated an entire paragraph which was self-contradictory, offered no non-Wikipedia supporting references, and was contradicted by the one Wikipedia page it linked to. Because the paragraph contained two errors of arithmetic, it was not possible to be sure what the intended point of it was. However, a reader could possibly interpret it as disputing a major -- and well-referenced -- aspect of Heffelfinger's life, namely that he is believed, on the basis of stated evidence, to be the first professional American football player.
If the deleted paragraph had reasonably stated "other football historians dispute Heffelfinger's priority" or something to that effect, I would have left it in place and noted that a reference was needed. But since the paragraph was logically scrambled, and identified another player who was clearly not the first (based on the linked Wikipedia page), it probably represents vandalism, not scholarship. So I deleted it entirely. Paugus (talk) 18:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Heffelfinger disputed as the first pro
Talk:Mirza Shafi Vazeh

message: The whole article has too many pictures, this has caused the eyes to get tired after a while, I think the pictures should be less. Thanks Amir Ghandi (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing out a way to improve the article. — CuriousGolden  (T·C)  12:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  too many pictures 

message: Another problem with the article is that Mirza Shafi's teacher-student relationship with the Iranian-Azerbaijani writer Mirza Fatali Akhundov is not mentioned. Mirza Shafi in his poems considers him wise, mature and has a searching mind to liberate his soul. (Maryam B. Sanjabi, Rereading the Enlightenment: Akhundzada and His Voltaire). Amir Ghandi (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any online accessible source that I can use to add about that? Or if you want, you can add it as well. — CuriousGolden  (T·C)  12:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: (http://www.visions.az/en/news/469/f54688b3/) (AZERBAIJANI WRITER MIRZA FATALI AKHUNDOV SUMMARY) (https://aqreqator.az/az/cemiyyet/435043) and (https://hafiztimes.com/anam-az%C9%99rbaycan-dilind%C9%99-danisir-m-f-axundzad%C9%99nin-yaponiyadaki-varisi-il%C9%99-ekskluziv-axundovun-varisi-parsinejad/) Almost all sources indicate that he had a teacher-student relationship and later a friendship with Akhundov.Amir Ghandi (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added Akhundov's student status to the Mirza Shafi Vazeh#Teaching_in_Tiflis section. Thanks for the help. — CuriousGolden  (T·C)  13:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally do not see any particular problem. Amir Ghandi (talk) 14:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirza Shafi and Mirza Fatali Akhundov 
Talk:Medinah, Illinois

message: What a horrible review of the Medinah.  Medinah is quite and peaceful.  There is not much to do but it is in the middle of everything else without the high taxes.  Obviously who ever wrote this has never been there.  The neighborhood a beautiful and everyone takes pride in their homes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.210.191.161 (talk • contribs) 
:I have since removed the vandalistic text that generated this complaint. — goethean ॐ 21:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The page suggests in the summary that Medinah is located in the Fox River Valley, but when clicking the link it is quite clear that this is not true. The claim is also not sourced (in case it is a local colloquialism, despite being geographically incorrect).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.51.209.114 (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: To that end, Medinah is located within the Salt Creek Watershed, which flows into the Des Plaines River. I can only speak for myself, but as a local, I've never heard it to be considered part of the Fox River Valley. Feltnokia (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fox River Valley" reference (September 2020)
Talk:Majuub (Dragon Ball)

message: Wouldn't his new name be buuub buu-uub
:If it was Buub, people wouldn't be able to distinguish his name so well. Also, they kept the "Majin" part in so that viewers would still know him as "Majin Buu", so a combination of "Majin Uub" would be best as "Majuub". Jienum
:that and calling a character boob really takes away any impact the character may have  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.166.205 (talk) 08:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  buuuub
Talk:Wheeling, West Virginia

message: Some of the areas listed in the “neighborhoods within Wheeling city limits” are in fact outside of the city limits, and are separate townships and villages with their own governments and elected officials, such as Benwood, Triadelphia, and Bethlehem.  It is incorrect to state that these areas are “neighborhoods within Wheeling’s city limits.  They may be considered to be within the Wheeling metropolitan area, but they are not part of the city.  This needs correction/clarification. 2601:54A:7F:AF20:B1C1:F11D:DF14:3180 (talk) 22:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of neighborhoods
Talk:U + Ur Hand

message: If  thinks Billboard charts such as the Hot Digital Songs are notable, he can go ahead and make his case at Wikipedia talk:Record charts, though I doubt he'll get far. He should also be warned not to persistently revert wholesale other people's edits without justification or explanation (much less an edit summary), which he knows isn't allowed. Extraordinary Machine 17:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hookerj 

message: Should we mention that this song is a minor re-working of the Veronicas' earlier (and superior) single "4Ever"?  Does the fact that both songs were written by the same people make this acceptable?  There is a mash-up mix of the two recordings floating arount the Web as a demonstration. Leeborkman 09:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities to Veronicas's 4Ever? 
Talk:Thomas Banchoff

message: See e.g. this  mini-bio from the Henri Poincaré Institute web site.  See also Math Genealogy link in the article.  It's all basic info, but the page doesn't claim all that much. Mhym 21:52, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification

message: In a bizarre celebrity cross-over event, he had Masi Oka  (of Heroes fame) as a student back when I took his class in 1992.  I have no idea if this is appropriate to include. Davidjelinek 23:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Silly trivia
Category talk:Categories by topic

message: This is a conversation continued from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 29 from where the following is copied:
*The example you gave (:Category:Categories by city) along with :Category:Categories by country seem to fit better under :Category:Categories by region (which they are also under). While they fit the naming convention of :Category:Categories by topic, they don't seem to fit the meaning. I wouldn't say that geographical location is a topic, whereas the eponymous categories do seem to be categories organised around a topic (and a portal is also, of course, a grouping of articles around a topic). I'm tempted to create :Category:Categories by geographical location, but the annoying thing about categories is having to wait a while before reorganising, otherwise people don't see what you are talking about. But maybe I'll do this anyway. Carcharoth 19:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does Categories by topic mean, and should it be renamed?
Category talk:Socialist parties in France

message: I shall have to stress this again: left-wing and socialism are not synonymous. The Radical Party was ecclectical, and possibly took inspiration from socialist programmes, but its inclusion creates confusion, and opposes its evident history as a mere left-of-the-centre party. Consider that it was in stiff competition with the party regrouping all socialist forces in the 1880s. Dahn 22:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Abdul Ghaffar (Guantanamo detainee 1032)

message: I didn't want to include the speculation that the Satellite phone possesses (sic) by Abdul Ghaffar was almost certainly owned by the Taliban commander Maulvi Abdul Ghaffar.  Wikipedia articles aren't supposed to include speculation.  It seems highly likely however.  --  Geo Swan 22:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Satellite phone?

message: I don't know which one of these guys, considering it says that they're locked up in Cuba, but CNN is reporting "Ghafour was killed Sunday in what NATO described as a "precisely planned and well executed operation" in which he was targeted and taken out while driving his car in an isolated area outside the village of Musa Qala."   Jonathankavner 16:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Killed by NATO on February 5, 2007?

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 11:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: disputed picture

message: The documents of Abdul Ghaffar' Combatant Status Review Tribunal and Administrative Review Board are 36 pages long. How do we choose which parts to include into this BLP? IQinn (talk) 05:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Interpretation of sources
Talk:Dick Giordano

message: Since his legacy is as an inker, i think it would be entirely appropriate to include works he inked, as well as his pencil work. i have added one, Dr Strange from 74.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Legacy

message: Someone should add to that article that Dick (indeed) Giordano was the DC Comics' executive who ordered the real Supergirl to be killed off in 1985, for all the fans of the real original Supergirl to know who was the person responsible for that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.244.138.135 (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Supergirl
Talk:Bob Layton

message: His site has a trojan. Can we warn sitegoers? - ToTheMoon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.68.2 (talk) 01:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tadley

message: I've changed the order of the sections to put the History section below sections that deal with the present. I think this will better suit the readers. Alan Pascoe 22:19, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of sections 

message: I think if these sites added extra information about the nature of Tadley, then they could be included. However, they serve a different purpose - to create an online community for residents of Tadley, without offering factual information about Tadley. 
See the policy on external links: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links
 * links that are promotional are not to be included
 * Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace), discussion forums or USENET.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kabads (talk • contribs) 21:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of social/community site links
Talk:Gabriel de Lorges, Count of Montgomery

message: I should prefer Gabriel, Count Montgomery,  leaving the first line as it is. Septentrionalis 22:25, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article says the wife was born in 1550. It also says she gave birth in 1551. I know people married young back then, but that's overdoing it a bit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.179.41.20 (talk) 01:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a serious problem.  I have two conjectures: that her birthdate was actually 1530, and that 1550 is the date of her marriage, not her birth.  Unfortunately I have no way to verify either. J S Ayer (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife's birthdate
Talk:Hilbert–Pólya conjecture

message: I tried to cleanup the edits by User:Karl-H but failed. In particular, this needs an equation for the kernel.linas 22:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fredholm stuff

message: User:85.85.104.70 (who, by a WP:COI trail, appears to identify himself as 'Jose Javier Garcia Moreta') has made recent edits to this article.  Many of his other edits have been unproductive, but I don't know this subject well enough to see if that is the case here.  Would someone please verify these?
CRGreathouse (t | c) 22:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check recent edits! 

message: It may be a minor point, but aside from the name of the conjecture, Hilbert isn't mentioned in this article.  Whether he didn't originate the idea, or if he was thought to have done so historically and our understanding has changed, shouldn't his role or lack thereof be mentioned? Stevko (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Where does Hilbert figure in this?

message: In the relation to the random matrix theory the distribution of non-trivial zeros of Riemann zeta function is a GUE as described in this article. Meanwhile, GUE means that the time-reversal symmetry breaking. What is Meaning of the time reversal symmetry breaking in the number-theoretic viewpoint?--Enyokoyama (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  random matrix
Talk:James E. Williams

message: Relocated from the article:
**The Medal of Honor should be shown, two stars up, three down. It appears inverted. And, it should also be displayed, alone, at the top of all other ribbons.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.44.112 (talk • contribs) 13:14, February 19, 2008
--BrokenSphereMsg me 22:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Williams' Medal of Honor ribbons

message: I believe it to be customary for US Army and US Marine Corps to wear ribbons four-to-a-row as shown at the moment (not sure about other branches), but US Navy is three-to-a-row.  I don't have time to rework it today, but should another editor see this they may want to do this. Weylin.piegorsch (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fixed now. Thornfield Hall (talk) 01:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award Arrangement
Talk:Meta-discussion

message: :Meta-discussion may seem artificial and even a waste of time as opposed to actual consideration of a topic. Interestingly, on his user page, Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales expresses a wish to keep meta-discussion of Wikipedia to a minimum on the encyclopedia's website.
While I certainly appreciate the irony of having this here, with a link to Jimbo's principle that we shouldn't have it here, maybe we should rewrite this to use non-Wikipedia sources. Twinxor t 22:35, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't resist the irony. There are already a number of non-Wikipedia examples in the article, so why not use Jimbo's comment, too? It adds a little humor (smile). Casey Abell 04:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another user removed the Jimbo example. I won't get into an edit war over this because the change hardly affects the article, but using Jimbo's remark seems harmless to me. It's a valid example of the use of the term "meta-discussion," and it lightens the article's tone a little. And since this is the meta-discussion article, the example doesn't "look inward" but is actually on-topic for the article. Casey Abell 12:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh no, meta-meta-discussion!