lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arlong Pirates

message: Important note: this page is work in progress.  I'm trying to set up this page and its sister pages, bare with me until they are completed.  In the meantime, I'd appricate any help anyone can provide.  Angel Emfrbl 15:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not complete

message: Where are all the names for these crews coming from? Angel Emfrbl 10:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jimbei is a Shichibukai... He abondoned his crew so he can't command anyone left in the 'Fish-men pirates'.  I'm gonna check the Japanese verison again and see what they are called in that verison.  I'm not sure but I think they are still the Fish-men pirates.  I differently know they are the 'Arlong pirates' in the english dub.  Angel Emfrbl 09:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I went through it quickly just now and confirmed one important thing - their ship in ep. 35 says 'Arlong' with Arlong flag.  Confirmation of name must be therefore 'Arlong's crew'.  I can also confirm it stated that they DID break away from the 'Fish-men' pirates, Jimbei's old group.  I also better get a picture of that ship up on here before we do that so we can all see what it says... I've done the same with the other pirate crews anyway.  Angel Emfrbl 09:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, it really should be changed. The crew is always referred to as the Arlong crew, the whole gyojin thing is only mentioned in passing. Murasaki Seiko 05:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names? 

message: How should we reference these characters? These ones are mentioned on page 54 of the book, but I don't know where to put that in the article itself. ^^;; Murasaki Seiko 19:58, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, just do what I've done with the Bellamy pirates for now.  We can sort it out later into a better format.  Don't forget to put a 'Blue data book' reference for those who haven't seen it.  ;) Angel Emfrbl 21:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: One Piece Blue characters
Talk:FRÖSI

message: Because of the rules of the GNU-FDL, I have to say that the article is mostly a (shortened) translation of the German article. But it would be really nice if somebody with better English knowledge could keep an eye on the grammer and spelling of the article, because English isn't my native language! :-) --Grandy02 15:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of German article [[de:FRÖSI]]
Talk:Holmen High School

message: Not sure if the References section is necessary, but the citations in the info box had links that didn't go anywhere, so I added the references.--Faith healer 21:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am moving this graph here until it works again.  It really broke up the page a lot by not displaying
-Wikideas1 (talk) 06:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Graphs not working on wikipedia for a while
Talk:List of Philippine Basketball Association champions

message: I'm just happy that Jun Limpot finally has a championship. ;B Photon shermie 15:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purefoods winning the 2005-06 Philippine Cup

message: The tally below shows that Alaska has won 12 conferences since joining the PBA. However, newspapers don't seem to recognize their 2003 Invitational Conference win. Should the 2003 Championship be included in the championship tally, or should it not be counted (like the 1998 Centennial Cup)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.243.115 (talk) 12:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Alaska Aces: 11 or 12 championships. 

message: Alaska currently has 14 titles and 14 runner-ups, I'll soon update but I want to delete what was said that the 2003 Invitational Conference crown is not counted, I don't see no reason why it shouldnt be counted, perhaps the 1998 Centennial Cup won by Mobiline can make a case that it was only a minor crown similar to the PBA/IBA Cup in 1987-1988. Edmon74 06:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Alaska officially has 13 championships, it was just recently that the PBA reclassified the 2003 Invitational Championship as a non-official title since not all of the teams have participated in the said tournament. It is already excluded in the 2013 edition of Hardcourt. -WayKurat (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes in the number of championships
Talk:Joramy

message: I have added more information about Joramy's enemies, and corrected a mistake I made earlier. Azezel 13:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Enemies

message: Please complete (issue #, date, article title, etc)--Robbstrd 00:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oerth Journal 11, Of Oerth and Alter, page four. Note sure of the date, though since none of the other listed sources in the article supply such detail I'm not sure it is necessary. 81.77.145.107 00:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try looking on the copyright page of the journal. Also supply publisher, plus a link, since the OJ is online. Format it properly, the put it in the references section of the article.--Robbstrd 01:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete references
Talk:Atia of the Julii

message: The article mentions that this character is very different from the slight information we have about the historical Atia's personality.  
Would there, at the time Tacitus was writing, have been pressures to describe the first Emperor's lineage too favorably? Jmacwiki (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly, but most of the historians of the time were staunch Republicans and were eager to condemn Augustus. It's not mentioned in the wiki article, but Atia as presented in the series is also based on the scheming wife of Marc Anthony, Fulvia. At Cicero's funeral, Fulvia famously pulled out her hairpins and stabbed his corpse in the tongue. In life, Cicero had frequently said some very nasty things about her. Reading her bio, I think you'll see the Atia character in the Rome show shine through. Definitely moreso than her namesake. 131.96.221.23 (talk) 20:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character vs. history
Talk:American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese

message: This sentence, in context, is confusing:  "The diocese was led by Metropolitan Nicholas Smisko of Amissos (1936-2011)."  That was his lifetime, but he only took over in 1985.  There were other leaders from 1938 on--2607:FEA8:D5DF:1AF0:79ED:2CA1:8C31:2184 (talk) 03:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  led by whom?
Talk:Art object

message: There seems to be a range of definitions for this.  On the web site for the National Gallery of Ireland, the two examples shown for objets d'art include a fan and a hot-chocolate pot, both having functional uses as well as artistic.  The Musee d'Orsay includes furniture in objets d'art, again having a practical function as well as a decorative one. - Mark Dixon 15:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This is a talk page. It shouldn't have categories, which I've removed. Has an article been put here by mistake? Ty 11:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page

message: Why are the redirects being undone? The redirect seems sensible. --Clubmarx (talk) 01:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that article explicitly states that the term was invented to convey a different meaning -
"The related terms "artwork" and "art object", used especially in American English, came into use in the 20th century, especially to describe modern and post-modern art, in order to avoid an older syntagma "piece of art" as a concept which was strongly tied with traditional aesthetics."Research Method (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not nearly different enough! The first line here "An art object is a physical object that is considered to fulfil or have fulfilled an independent and primarily aesthetic function." is a perfectly good description of of a work of art in the visual arts, which is by far the commoner term.  What is a "syntagma" btw? No adequate case has been made for separating the two. I notice they were previously merged in 2006.  Johnbod (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Sounds like nitpicking and word parsing by research methad...The consensus disagrees...they are not different enough...Modernist (talk) 03:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only because I just put it back to that, undoing your changes. I suggest you learn how to read the history. What is your point exactly? Johnbod (talk) 23:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did you exclude objects from the definition, while aruing for the merger? Research Method (talk) 00:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect to [[Work of art]]
Talk:Autocephaly

message: Reading the article on the Georgian Orthodox Church, one gets the idea that it was independently founded by Saint Andrew rather than Saint Peter and has been autocephalous from the beginning. This article however states it broke from Russian Orthodox in 1917. Did it come to be part of Russian Orthodox when Georgia became part of the Russian empire? 65.118.97.26 (talk) 22:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgia 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 12:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Autocephaly →  – The article currently covers both subjects, and both subjects are closely related. The concepts exists in both churches, e.g. :ROCOR and :Jacobite Syrian Christian Church.
Moreover, it will be useful to have a page which explains what the autonomy of a Church means in the E. and O. Orthodox Churches. Currently,  the article explains what autonomy in the EO and OO Churches is (the concepts, as far as I know, are the same in both churches so by describing the concepts as seen by the EO Church we have the description as understood in the OO Church); despite this, there is no go-to article to explain the concept of autonomy in this context, due to the name of the article.
The word "autonomy" can mean numerous things, this is why I believe it is important to add "(Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Churches)" next to the title, and also because of WP:PRECISE. Veverve (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 March 2021 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Christocephalous and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#Christocephalous until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Christocephalous" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Luther High School (Wisconsin)

message: Yeah, the colors are black and white, the gold snuck in there somewhere over time.
Derdom 20:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes the school colors are Balck and White the gold is an accent. The Black aand White are symbolic to "the old and new adam" the gold was added to accent and after a teacher left(forgot name) it was addd more and more thorugh he years. 
          -my mom attended the high school and i currently attend so i know this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bryjwal13 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Colors
Talk:Ben Adams

message: Have removed the section on the American Ben Adams. After googling him and his company he came up with few hits so not sure if he is relevant. If anybody can disprove this then please re-enter the info but in a SEPERATE article not on the bottom of this.
Have also changed some of the text on the pop star Ben Adams, including removing some unencyclopaedic stuff and formalising some of the language. Richardbates2002
Once again the section on the American Ben Adams has appeared.
He does not seem to be of genuine public interest, worthy of an inclusion of Wikipedia.
If this is not the case, and he should be on Wikipedia, then a seperate article should be created. Kevinbrighton 20:00, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major re-write 
Talk:Francisco Elson

message: I am inclind to delete the whole paragraph on the groin-shot-Garnett-is-gay.  It seems like a trivial detail and not deserving of 20% of the article space.  Any thoughts? --Mikebrand 15:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groin Shot 
Talk:Embraer EMB 120 Brasilia

message: The article writes:"The EMB 120 Brasilia and smaller EMB 110 Bandeirante are Embraer's only turboprop-driven aircraft in its civilian product line".Well, EMB 110 Bandeirante is out of production line, since 1980 decade.Agre22 (talk) 17:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it should be noted that the EMB-121 Xingu is turboprop driven too, although its production ceased in 1987. 189.15.230.243 (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: Hi folks. I corrected and revised information about the origins of EMB-120 design. Also removed the phrase "The design retained the T-tail and supercritical wing of the EMB 121 Xingu" because its completely false. Added link references.
RobertoRMola (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design Family Origins 

message: why is there no acute accent on the article name? The plane was named after Brazil's capital Brasília, written with the accent. 2804:14C:65D6:4C44:88E9:BF76:4C54:34D4 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ask Embraer, not wikipedia. pt.wikipedia, maybe? --Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

text: there is even a note in pt.wikipedia (auto translate) : In the name of the airplane the word is spelled without accent acute: Brasilia . [ 1 ] [ 2 ] As can be seen from the technical data sheet of the airplane, [ 1 ] EMB 120 is the code that the manufacturer created to identify its product (airplane), while Brasilia (without acute accent) is the commercial name The manufacturer attributed to that product.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: The Infobox lists the number of airplanes built as 354, but a 1991 news article says Embraer had delivered 500 Brasilias: https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-1991-08-28-9102020549-story.html. D271l (talk) 07:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I researched the subject. Most spotters production lists are ~350-360, one was 500 but with many duplicates. I found a reliable source for 357.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 09:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the "Number built" field incorrect?
Talk:Economy (religion)

message: There's a quote in the third paragraph about what the canons of the Orthodox Church state, but the quote doesn't have ending quotation marks. At what point do we stop giving the Church's statement about itself and return to our (supposedly neutral) reporting on the issue? Gentgeen 01:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It goes at least through the word "case", according to this web site. Michael Hardy 01:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I googled that next sentence with quoation marks around it, and at a quick glance it looks as if the only hits are on pages that may have been copied from Wikipedia.  So it's probably not part of the quote.  If it's not, I'd leave it there, somewhat rephrased to make it NPOV, maybe saying that that's what the Eastern Orthodox Church intends. Michael Hardy 23:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  where does the quote end? 

message: Here is a study about oikonomia. Might come in handy.
Nun Vassa (Larin). The Ecclesiastical Principle of oikonomia and the ROCOR under Metropolitan Anastassy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtemGr (talk • contribs) 11:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  links?
Talk:Moon Over Miami (song)

message: Complete lyrics to copyrighted songs cannot be included in Wikipedia articles, per Wikipedia policy, so I have deleted them (otherwise someone might slap a big Copyvio tag on the article or even delete the whole thing). If the lyrics, despite only being written in 1935, have somehow lapsed into the public domain, this needs to be cited. Quoting a single line or two is OK. 23skidoo 15:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted lyrics
Talk:De Havilland Canada Dash 7

message: Apparently the BAS Dash 7 had a problem on landing at Sky Blu when one engine had the reverse thrust malfunction - this resulted in the aircraft skidding round on the ice. The aircraft is currently stranded at Sky Blu, whilst equipment, engineers and a new engine are being ferried out to it in BAS Twin Otters. The Dash 7 is tethered to holes cut in the ice and chocked into a bay cut into snow - all to give some protection from strong winds.
All this is "word of mouth" - does anyone have any sources (now, or likely in the near future) that may provide sufficient for addition to the article?ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 23:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent/current incident 

message: I have reverted the edits by User:Username006 and here, I hope, is an answer to the question:
The name de Havilland has the first part start with a lower case letter. That is the way people with this name want it to be, so that is the way it is. You will find that all (I believe - not going to check every one) of the Wikipedia articles on aircraft made by de Havilland adhere to this spelling convention. Therefore, I think we can take it that there is a consensus of editors on the matter.
WP:NCLOWERCASEFIRST explains why names of his sort are a problem for Wikipedia. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 16:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, as the name of the manufacturer changed sometime in the 2010's. Username006 (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lower case title 

message: I have added a banner, as there seems to be some sort of witchcraft going on.
The article states only 17 remain in service, and yet with over 20 airlines apparently operating them, and over twenty countries with operators!?!?
There must be an error somewhere. 12:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: They are only five operators listed in current airlines, the rest are in former operators. MilborneOne (talk) 17:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current airline and other operators 

message: As declared a STOL-plane some values should be given in the "Specifications" section for the /7. 46.114.5.208 (talk) 13:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 15:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Takeoff distance" and "Landing run" missing
Talk:Evangelical Orthodox Church

message: I've reverted some changes which were unsourced and the edit summary indicated a conflict of interest. Edit summary was "This is a major edit that better reflects the current status and history of the Evangelical Orthodox Church (EOC) and that is endorsed by the current synod of bishops within the EOC. Please reach out to presiding bishop Jerold Gliege at [redacted] if you intend to edit this update". Tacyarg (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest edits 

message: It goes SCHWOOP SCHWOOP SCHWOOP! 2601:800:C003:6010:1C2E:E05E:8E1B:E478 (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  My ROFLcopter
Talk:Pactum Warmundi

message: I took out the stub template. Hope that was the right thing to do. Andrew Dalby 15:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: After having reviewed the article I've put it on hold per the following major problems (listed following the Good Article Criteria listing):
*1. This article is completely unreferenced, and according to the Wikipedia:Good article criteria this article needs lots of references (at least one per paragraph). It is not enough to put your sources at the bottom of the page, you need to provide references to your sources (ex:"Prawer, Joshua (1980). Crusader Institutions, pg. 12-14") and put them in the proper place.
*2. Does not contain any images. Per WP:WIAGA, the article should contain images appropiate to the subject.
I'll check back in seven days and see if the article has improved enough to deserve a GA promotion. Regards, Eurocopter tigre 11:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will hog the glory and/or take the blame and claim responsibility for this article, so I will attempt to address these concerns as soon as I can, but it won't be in the next couple of days, unfortunately. Check back in another couple of weeks. Adam Bishop 01:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA nomination
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel (Scandinavian TV channel)

message: If this is a list of programs broadcast by The Disney Channel and produced solely by The Disney Channel, then it should remain separate and the title should be changed to "Programs produced by The Disney Channel". If it includes programs produced by other companies, then I agree with the merge. FWIW - ♥ Her Pegship♥ 15:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Orthodox Church in Italy

message: The "Orthodox Church in Italy" is NOT a canonical organization in the sense that it is not part of the Eastern Orthodox communion. This is evidenced by its relationship with the (also non-canonical) Montegrin and Macedonian groups, as well as with the "Kiev Patriarchate."  It is unrecognized by all the ancient Patriarchates, the Russian Church, etc. Accordingly, I've removed the reference to its status as canonical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinkage (talk • contribs) 19:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled]
Talk:Ignatius IV of Antioch

message: Dear all,
Ignatius IV article doesn't have a reference to his birthdate, but according to Portuguese wikipedia article, Ignatius IV was born in 17 de abril de 1.920 em Muhardeh, região de Hama, na Síria -- that is April 17th 1920, in Muhardeh, region of Hama, in Syria.
i hope that's useful.
All the best,
--Hgfernan 22:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But he died in Beirut, Lebanon. --Juhan121 (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth, according to Portuguese Wikipedia 
Talk:Lise Van Susteren

message: accepts her evaluations of world leaders, but some want this wiki page deleted... strange.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.245.158 (talk) 22:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIA 

message: According to the Washington Post article, Lise's sister Greta, a Scientologist, appeared at Lise's campaign kickoff announcement in an apparent show of support.  Given Scientology's hostility to psychiatry, that's rather interesting.  I wonder if there's a way to incorporate that apparent contradiction into the article. LeoO3 22:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greta's support 

message: The bio on Greta goes to some length to establish that the late Senator McCarthy lived in her father's homw while he was a Senator.
The bio on her sister Lise merely says that father eventually broke with McCarthy.
The implication of the former is that Greta is the product of McCarthyism. The implcation of the latter is that her sister Lise is not.
Since the sisters were presumably children, I am not sure how much of the McCarthy bit belongs in either bio, BUT IT SHOULD BE THE SAME IN BOTH BIOS
Whillier (talk) 18:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The McCarthy Connection 

message: Recent edits by Andrea Rohnovde were done on behalf of the subject of the article and approved by her. This is a clear conflict of interest, and should be examined closely by editors.  --Sift&Winnow 16:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: I am questioning the removal of the citation involving Lise Van Susteren's political campaign. The citation would provide verification that such an event took place.Thank you-RFD (talk) 18:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of citation