lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pépé et sa Guitare

message: This page was translated from the entry on the French Wikipedia  - Haunti (give'r) 17:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated from French Wikipedia 

message: I'm working on an edit to demonstrate notability. Should be up shortly. - Haunti Talk 16:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion
Talk:List of character tables for chemically important 3D point groups

message: This page is in progress, with the intent of finalizing a good version and moving it ito the article space. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 17:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

message: It is a fairly standard convention to typset the imaginary unit i as Roman font  \mathrm{i} (like cos and sin) while italic is used for variables. Would this be an improvement as italic i is used as an index? I know this is a chmistry article really rather than maths, and I don;t know chemistry conventions. Billlion (talk) 02:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex unit
Talk:Siskiyou Summit

message: I disagree with the merge; this is also crossed by a rail line. --NE2 13:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it a notable rail line? —Scott5114↗ 21:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see you've added it to the article. Well, this is a mountain pass and not a road, and since it's crossed by more than I-5, it's out of WP:USRD's scope. Detagged and released from project. —Scott5114↗ 21:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I just learned that Siskiyou Pass  and Siskiyou Summit  are separate passes. The pass is on the former route through the area, and the summit is on I-5, of course. So the redirect needs to be turned into a separate article at some point. Katr67 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a stab at it and created a stub.  Softtest123 (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, thank you! Katr67 (talk) 00:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pass/Summit
Talk:Saint Stanislaus College

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Superior suprarenal artery

message: According to the Terminologia Anatomica, there are several superior suprarenal arteries, regardless of bilaterality. Even Gray's Anatomy states that "Each vessel (inferior phrenic on each side) gives off superior suprarenal branches to the suprarenal gland of its own side." Kulystab (talk) 13:18, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numerous superior suprarenal arteries
Talk:XHTML Mobile Profile

message: “Both WML (the markup language of WAP 1.x) and XHTML MP (the markup language of WAP 2.0) do not support file upload. But fortunately the browser on some WAP 2.0 cell phones support the <input type="file"> element as an extension of XHTML MP. Some HTML-capable WAP browsers also support the <input type="file"> element.”
Mathiastck 17:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The DTD file http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/DTD/xhtml-mobile12.dtd (and others on this domain) does no longer exist, obviously it has been deleted. Thus web authors should not use the Open Mobile Alliance DTDs.
87.163.61.86 (talk) 09:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/DTD/xhtml-mobile12.dtd no longer exists 

message: What the differences to regular XHTML? The example looks like standard XHTML to me - perhaps it would be possible to create on that shows things that are different in XHTML?--Cyberman TM (talk) 13:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences to XHTML? Example?
Talk:Arthur Mold

message: Please, all you happy cricket nuts, can you please hold yourselves to just one featured article a year about cricketers? Especially dead white male cricketers.
The world is such a big place. Same goes for Dreadnought Battleships, coins struck by the US Mint, and Video Games.
Slip them in to the did you know etc., but featured articles should be one a year max...
"Did You Know the dead white male cricketers appear on Wikipedia's Feature Article page more than any other topic than Dreadnought Battleships?"
Thanks! 72.141.106.240 (talk) 00:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self Restraint? 

message: This article is dominated by the "suspicions" that "condemned" Mold's "dubious" and "unfair" technique which "erupted" controversy.
For anyone unfamiliar with cricket this is frustratingly incomprehensible without a visit to the articles bowling action, delivery, and throwing. I suggest this be better summarized early in the present article. Something like: "only the rotation of the shoulder may be used to impart velocity to the ball. If the elbow is straightened more than 15 degrees it is considered 'throwing', one of the most serious and controversial charges that can be made." --Cornellier (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with above and ... esoteric without elaboration of what is "unfair" about Mold's throwing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Contacts

message: *Cla68- Pacific War
**Could you specify this a bit more? Where are your strengths/weaknesses? Wandalstouring 14:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|Cla68}}

message: *Beit Or. I can help with two areas: Varangians (where I've written a featured article Caspian expeditions of the Rus) and Arab conquests. Beit Or 18:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|Beit Or}}

message: *Pre-modern Japanese and Okinawan history (pre-1860s). I would also be happy to help out on later events as best I can, but I do not by any means consider myself a WWII expert.
**Support Wandalstouring 17:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|LordAmeth}}

message: *I am honored Wandalstouring thought of me, and I would be glad to assist in any area I am asked to work in.  I am most conversant with:
::1) The Mongol Empire from it's rise to the Great Standing, including Timer-eh-Link;
::2) The Carolingian Empire, including the formulative period from Peppin the Middle on;
::3) The Later Roman Empire, including the Byzantine Empire, from the Pax Romana to the Fall of Constandinople. old windy bear 01:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|Oldwindybear}}

message: Has sources at hand to check information
subjects
#Chinese gunpowder warfare
#Franco-Prussian War
#generally-speaking, 19th century European warfare
*Support Wandalstouring 16:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|PericlesofAthens}}

message: *Greek histroy. Mainly classical period and Hellenistic period (where I have written my two FAs:Cretan War and War against Nabis) as well as Ottoman and modern Greek MilHist.
*Support Carom 03:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|Kyriakos}}

message: *My primary areas of expertise are Small Arms of the British Empire & Commonwealth, WWI & WWII small arms, and, to a lesser extent, Military & Police handguns. I've got quite an extensive reference library as well, which I'm always happy to put to good use here on Wikipedia. --Commander Zulu 03:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|Commander Zulu}}

message: *Semperf - Topics related to Ancient Rome
*Support Wandalstouring 08:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{User|Semperf}}

message: RM Gillespie - Topics related to the Vietnam War and the Second Indochina War 
*Support, probably the foremost editor working on those areas. Kirill 23:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{User|RM Gillespie}} 

message: Piotrus - Topics related to military history of Poland in particular.
*Support I met him before and I like his work. Wandalstouring 18:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{User|Piotrus}} 

message: Please add new invitations below. If the invited gives his consent, you may open an election process above.
oldwindybear by Wandalstouring 10:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I consent to be the Roman contact.  semper fictilis 13:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitations 

message: Is this going to be formaly concluded or anything? Or did I miss something? :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Latady Island

message: The kilometer to mile conversion appears to be incorrect in the statement, "about 60 km (35 miles) long and nearly 40 km (more than 10 miles) wide."  Using Google Maps, it looks like the island is nearly 40 km wide at the widest point, and more than 10 miles wide at the narrowest, but why would there be a different measuring standard for different units?   Jtnygard (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From the revision history, it appears that the estimates in km (also the one regarding the distance from the other islands) are estimates that were made by a Wikipedian on the basis of Google Maps, and added to the figures in miles without care as to whether the newly inserted figures even fit together with the ones already present in the article. Using the distance tool, I arrive at figures that are well compatible with the area estimate of 3300 km² but incompatible with all the other figures, including yours: the island appears to be about 110 km long but about 30 km wide on average. Unless Google Maps is completely misleading or incorrect, the alternative figure of 700 km² given on List of Antarctic and subantarctic islands is quite off. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The dimension of 35 by 10 miles are sourced to the Geographic Names Information System, although it is unclear whether these are nautical miles or land miles. The area of 3300 km² (1274 mi², 962 nmi²) is inconsistent with these dimensions, the island is roughly rectangular so its area would be about 35 x 10 = 350 square miles. I will delete the area from the infobox. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Area
Talk:Arthur Robinson (cricketer, born 1946)

message: According to Cricinfo, there are two other Englishmen and one Irishman with the same name who played first-class cricket. However, the Yorkshireman had by some way the most significant cricketing career and so it is right to leave him under this article title. Loganberry (Talk) 23:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Arthur Robinsons
Talk:Petermann Island

message: The article doesn't say which country/countries, if any, claim the island. If there are any please add, thanks. --kingboyk (talk) 22:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info? 

message: I was just at Petermann Island in Feb 2012, and the refuge hut was destroyed in a storm. I haven't been able to find any documentation of this on the web, though... --Pudowski (talk) 15:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refuge hut is now gone
Talk:Bill Doggett

message: Under the song title "Honkey Tonk" there are 4 writers listed; one of which is Clifford Scott (in red - meaning he has no Wiki site) If you go to Wiki: "Bill Doggett" it states that in Bill Doggett's jazz band one of the sax players was Clifford Scott. I originally went to both sites to see who played the tenor sax solo on "Honkey Tonk" Parts I & II therefore I'm going to go out on the limb and say that the sax player on Honky Tonk is Clifford Scott - could someone with credentials please confirm this? And if my suspicions are true then I propose we get a Wiki site up for Clifford Scott who played one of the all time great sax solos in a R&B/Rock instrumental. How many sax players learned every lick this cat played on parts I & II? JSJR 12212012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.76.56.97 (talk) 08:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songwriting credit and Sax Player
Talk:Moroni's promise

message: This article doesn't appear to abide by Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources -- 12.106.111.10 17:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Short quotes are fine. It's long quotes that are frowned upon. DJ Clayworth (talk) 19:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion of primary source text
Talk:MTL (transport company)

message: I suggest that the information from MTL (train operator) should be merged into MTL (transport company). This is becuase both franchises already have their own information pages, and an entirely seperate article is not needed to summarise these. There is only a small amount of relevant information, therefore it would be better for it to be placed here. Jorvik 17:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I propose that the section of MTL's bus operations be split into a separate page called Merseybus. To put it simply, this article is too damn big for it's own good, and the format of the section dividing operators/operations under subheaders is really only serving to squander historical information being chronologically added about Merseybus from deregulation to eventual Arriva acquisition.
What I propose is to split the subsections 'Merseybus', 'Merseymaid', 'Merseymini' and 'Lancashire Travel' into the new article, as they are most relevant to Merseybus before the creation of MTL Trust Holdings, and maintain the other sections under the MTL article. Feedback is welcome on if more or less of the article should be split.
A lot of this article dates back to long-winded IP edits from 2006 or 2007, which carry no sources at all. Besides a split making the article less long, I reckon it would allow for the tons of writing in each section to be critically assessed and either cited or removed for lack of sourcing. Hullian111 (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably a good idea. Presumably you would leave a brief resume on the main page, similar to the sections on MTL London and Manchester. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes, absolutely, especially for how important Merseybus is to MTL's founding. Hullian111 (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm concerned, (I only took some pictures), go for it. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed
Talk:Thurston Island

message: As the island lies between 90' West and 150' West, and south of 60' South, it looks as if it is within Territorial_claims_in_Antarctica#Unclaimed. Should this be noted in the article? Alekksandr (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclaimed area?
Talk:Cananea strike

message: A lot of the wording in this article is absolute.
For example:
"Diaz was extremely corrupt and only wanted to support him and his his followers"
"Greene had unlimited sovereignty over lots of Mexican land"
This can be misleading and is often false/inaccurate as evidence suggests it is highly unlikely Diaz only wanted to support his followers or that Greene had unlimited sovereignty over this land.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.1.84 (talk) 12:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Template talk:Non-free audio sample

message: Please see discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Music_samples#Detailed_fair_use_justification.3F and reply there. Thanks. Dcoetzee 18:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just buzzed on my watchlist, for some reason. I see a deceptive pipe to "English-language Wikipedia", which no one in their right mind would ever click on. It goes to WP:NFCC. Can this be made explicit? Tony (talk) 03:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed fair use justification? 

message: why is the patroller parameter here "image has rationale"? this template is used exclusively for audio samples; couldn't it at least be something more inclusive, such as "file has rationale"? i realize that this isn't an urgent matter, but to me, leaving the term "image" seems simply improper. a bot could easily manage the search and replace. ~ Boomur [☎] 00:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  image? has rationale 

message: This template can be switched to use  if a slight change in items is acceptable; I've drafted a new version of the template at Template:Non-free audio sample/sandbox. Yes, I know I can edit this template myself, but I'd like at least one other person agreeing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 29 January 2020 

message: Can you add "|additional notes=# Template:Non-free use rationale audio sample may be helpful for stating the rationale. and put it behind "{{Uploader information" and put it in front of "{{{file other
| [[Category:Wikipedia non-free audio samples|" please? LucasKannou (talk) 02:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 18:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 1 April 2022
Talk:Constitution of Greece

message: What about the linguistic nuance of syntagma? I'm sorry I can't collaborate as my English is not good enough, but I think this article should be improved by adding the information about the linguistic meaning of syntagma = phrase.--79.145.225.13 (talk) 17:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Adding a link to Syntagmatic structure. LinguistAtLarge (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clifford torus

message: : It would appear this torus is approximated by an n-m-gonal duoprism, or a 3D subset of a duoprism? Tom Ruen (talk) 05:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the image above is very similar, just an edge-framework, so apparently the square are faces on the torus surface, and the 23,29-gonal polygons are ignored? Tom Ruen (talk) 05:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems accurate to me... may be worth adding a section describing the relation.  The important bit is that the m-gon and n-gon must each have the same radius so that the resulting shape lies entirely on the 3-sphere.  JasonHise (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duoprism relation? 

message: And why is it named Clifford? —Tamfang (talk) 23:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  eponym 

message: The description of the Clifford torus as an example of "Euclidean geometry" is surely wrong. The Euclidean plane is equivalent to \mathbb R^2, but the Clifford torus is equivalent only to a finite subset. If you set up a Cartesian coordinate system with the origin at the centre of the fundamental square, it will bump into itself across the joining zippers, where finite coordinate values must suddenly change sign. If you adjust the metric to be infinite at the zippers (known to some geometers as the absolute line) then Euclidean geometry will never reach them and the square is not even joined up to become a torus. Sure it is locally Euclidean, but then so is any smooth coordinate manifold. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 11:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euclidean properties
Template talk:Infobox union by country

message: I left this alone. There are stacks of different legislation, true, but it seems to me that many countries can point to one or two pieces that are understood as "primary". However, I'm talking from a pretty small base of knowledge, so I could just be full of it. :)--Bookandcoffee 18:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary trade union legislation

message: Turns out ILO membership is a slightly complicated issue when it comes to subnational autonimous jurisdictions.  Eg, when the UK ratifies a convention, UK  dependencies and territories do not automatically become subject to the convention, they must ratify/ascent to it themselves.  Have adapted the template to reflect this.  --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:15, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I have incorporated a parameter that allows editors to add the status of trade unions rights with reference to ITUC Global Rights Index. --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I notice that the Global Rights Index doesn't have a page, and it's somewhat unusual to see a redlink in an infobox. Could we create the page (or redirect) if it's justified, or remove the link if it's not?  talk 20:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  - apologies, and thanks for the nudge.  It was on my to do list following my edits to the infobox...lots of other issues intervened on the way.  Problem now solved. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  rights violations 

message: Further to the details regarding conventions and sub national autonomous territories (eg Saint Helena, Zanzibar etc), conventions are not ratified but declared.  The template will now switch to "declaration" when ILO membership is set to "other".--Goldsztajn (talk) 10:48, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  declaration vs ratification
Talk:Robert Prince (captain)

message: I was actually not sure about his date of birth.  There isn't much info about Robert Prince virtually.  In the article written 2005, it said he was 85, so if you do the math that makes it 1920.
Also, I have no idea how long he was in service for, it said he went back 1946 but never really put an end date on how high he went in rank or how long he stayed.--Jonmwang 18:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Touring motorcycle

message: This article is confusing. It lists the FJR1300 and ST1300 as both standard tourers and sports tourers. Plus both are listed in the sport touring article too. Ditto the R1200RT. I think we need to be consistent across both articles and only put bikes in one category. IMHO the ST1300, FJR1300 and R1200RT are all sports tourers. What do others think? --TimTay (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No replies so under the principle of WP:BOLD I removed all the standard tourers which were also listed as sport tourers and which, in most cases, are listed as sport tourers on the manufacturer's websites. --TimTay (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion