lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Respiratory disturbance index

message: The formula is given on this page as:
RDI = (RERAs + Hypopneas + apneas) X 60 / TST (in hours)
which is then described as the number of events per hour.  Why is the "X 60" in there?  I believe the verbal description, events per hour, is correct (see: http://healthysleep.med.harvard.edu/sleep-apnea/diagnosing-osa/understanding-results , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9927364 ).  But this description doesn't match the formula; the description would suggest the formula
RDI = (RERAs + Hypopneas + apneas) / TST (in hours)
without the "X 60".
I don't feel that I have sufficient access to medical sources considered authoritative to find a good citation for this, and I don't have easy access to the currently-cited source for verification.  But I strongly suspect this is in error.
Emertonom (talk) 02:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in formula?
Talk:Rheumatoid pleuritis

message: "Steroids are the mainstay of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and have been shown to improve rheumatoid pleuritis." this wiew in treatment does not reflect the current approach to rheumatoid arthritis. Currently the "mainstay" of treatment is rather disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. (called DMARDS). Their effect on RA manifestations other than joint disease are not well known.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekoraytascilar (talk • contribs) 08:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Clutter (software)

message: - Clutter API does not use the 'GTK+ toolkit'. Clutter uses GObject! There is a GTK add on which allows you to embed clutter in GTK+ applications as a widget
:fixed EmmanueleBassi (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed EmmanueleBassi (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

text: fixed EmmanueleBassi (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: There are a few errors here

message: I'm not sure, but shouldn't GTK+ be in the 'See also' section? QT is. Lopifalko (talk) 12:27, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: GTK+?

message: Title says it all. CameronNemo (talk) 07:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move examples into separate section 
Talk:Tristan Maack

message: I have place a tag suggesting that this article should be merged to the New Democratic Party candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election article as it doesn't seem to be notable enough to have it's own article but enough to be worth mentioning on the candidates list article.--JForget  22:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. I couldn't find that list. I was looking for it.--Apples99 23:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Gordon Kubanek

message: I am suggesting that this article should be merge with Green Party candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election as it does not meet WP:BIO for an individual article.--JForget  22:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is a mess. This article is longer for a 4th party candidate than it is for many 2nd party candidates. Please merge.MiltonP Ottawa (talk) 09:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:List of Honey and Clover characters

message: According to the standard interpretation of the policy for the use of non-free images, an illustration for each character in a list of characters is too many: It is strongly preferred fair-use images be limited to a couple group shots, to illustrate the appearence of a the main characters and demonstrate the style used to depict them. Personally, I think it'd be good to have images from a variety of media, to show how they are adapted -- in this case, a manga image, an anime image, and a live-action image (probably the movie). I note that the image on the main article is a group shot from the anime, which would work. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I deleted " There is a possibility that Ayumi would end up with Nomiya, though it has never been shown in the series." from Yamada's section.  It's self-admitted speculation, so I felt it was both unnecessary and misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.205.193 (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Hagu and Takemoto are shown to be even more closer than her and Yamada in many chapters, with him being dubbed as "Hagu master" in one chapter. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 09:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: "Although not shown as much as her relationship with Hagu, she is close friends with Takemoto and Morita" is not necessarily true. Morita and Yamada has shown to be very close in many chapters with Morita being more of a guardian to her (and possibly having had romantics feelings for her) and having indepth perception of her and Mayama's relationship. 
:Also Hagu and Takemoto are shown to be even more closer than her and Yamada in many chapters, with him being dubbed as "Hagu master" in one chapter. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 09:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamada and Hagu infos 
Talk:Family Coalition Party of Ontario candidates in the 2007 Ontario provincial election

message: Anybody, considered an article about the list of candidates for the Family Coalition for this past election, so we can merge this article with it as it doesn't meet WP:BIO. If not during the next 7-10 days, I will proposed the article for deletion.--JForget  23:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that this comment was referring to an earlier version of this article at the title "Danny Moran". Bearcat (talk) 05:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: On reading this and related articles it seems that the party in question fielded either 83 candidates, of whom none won his seat, and the party's share of the popular vote in 2007 was 0.82%, and in 2003, 0.80%.  64 of the candidates placed fifth choice in their respective field of candidates, and 19 did not place in the first five candidates.
The article itself seems therefore to be a set of CVs of political candidates for a regional assembly who never had a hope of being elected and have, for the most part, played no other role, political or otherwise, meriting mention in this encyclopedia.
I propose that this article be merged to the general article about the candidates in this election (see link in section header).  If any of these candidates does merit an article in his own right, then of course such an article may be created without prejudice to this merge. --Tony Sidaway 11:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If its not broke, don't fix it. Its fine the way it is. 74.14.147.245 (talk) 22:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

text: The general article that you've proposed as a merge target is a results table, and the content of this article would be both inappropriate and out of place there. And for what it's worth, merged bio lists like this are standard practice for electoral candidates who aren't notable enough for their own standalone articles. Bearcat (talk) 05:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge to [[Ontario general election, 2007 (candidates)]]
Talk:Ric Dagenais

message: I don't think Dagenais is notable for an individual article so I suggest to merge him to the New Democratic Party candidates, 2007 Ontario provincial election and/or New Democratic Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election articles.--JForget  23:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't immediately see anything that makes this guy more notable than any other candidate, so your proposal makes sense at first glance.  I'll leave a note on User:CJCurrie (the article creator)'s talk page; he's an experienced Wikipedian, and I'd least like to hear his reasons for creating it before I support getting rid of it. Sarcasticidealist 23:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I've added merge templates for the 2003 provincial and 2004 federal elections, since he ran for the NDs in those as well.  If there's some policy that I'm not aware of that says that candidates are only listed in the most recent of each election type's article, feel free to delete the new templates. Sarcasticidealist 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:List of enlistment age by country

message: It would be interesting to know about maximum ages for recruitment too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.49.202.23 (talk) 08:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum age 

message: Is the age really 69 in the first group of countries or is it a troll edit? --2603:7000:75F0:15C0:D871:14CD:59EC:1DFA (talk) 00:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  69?
Category talk:Physician astronauts

message: I started this category.  However, it's not easy to create.  I have not seen a single website so it's up to me to remember the names and search piecemeal.  If it helps the WP community, good!  Maybe someone will look up one and then want to read about other physician astronauts. Archtransit 23:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:CFD]]
Talk:Blackburn Cult

message: Can we find a more neutral title? 'Cult' is a pejorative. Sfacets 00:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be what they are best known as.  Checking the L.A. Times archive I see they aere called a cult as far back as 1929,when the term was not necessarily pejorative.    ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 00:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral title

message: I oppose the merger with Simi Valley. The only relationship is location. There is additional info available about this group. I don't see any reason for a merger.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 04:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Bedder

message: The article strongly implies that bedders/scouts are all female. This hasn't been the case for many decades, and would actually be an illegal practice. Bedders/scouts are really just domestic cleaners nowadays, and I know several male scouts personally. It's even possible the majority are now male, though I don't have a good ref to support this. The days when they were matronly, motherly figures supporting lonely (male) undergraduates are long gone. Ef80 (talk) 16:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender
Talk:Cambridge special access scheme

message: I suggest that this article be deleted, for the reasons outlined below:
*This article is not encyclopedic, and the information available here is not the sort of information which one would expect to find in an encyclopedia.
*The information is out of date (for example, there is no longer a separate Cambridge Application Form).
*It is largely a reproduction of the University's own website (copyright) which is kept up to date.
*The information is unsourced, (in fact, one source could be given - http://www.cam.ac.uk/admissions/undergraduate/apply/index.html#csas)
*Wikipedia should not serve as an out of date cache of the University of Cambridge website.
*It should also not carry newsfeed-like information about present university policies, unless they are particularly noteworthy.
*Information here may mislead potential applicants, who should properly retrieve information about admissions from the University's website.
A.C. Norman (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Cambridge University Catholic Chaplaincy

message: Currently working on a re-write at User:OrangeDog/Cambridge University Catholic Chaplaincy, along the lines of Newman Society. Help welcome. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 02:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: The bot seems to be in error. The bulk of the information in this article cannot be found at http://www.fisherhouse.org.uk, and I did not consult the website until after I had written the article prose. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CorenSearchBot 
Talk:High table

message: Unless those two colleges have identical dining halls, this particular one is placed in Oriel College, not Exeter. I've been dining there for few days and I just checked it with my personal photos from my stay in Oriel -  it's the same hall. 91.198.53.100 (talk) 09:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: That's Oriel, not Exeter

message: I would suggest merging this article with Formal Hall as there is not much more that can be written in this article.  WikiWebbie (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Formal Hall?

message: This sentence is very hard to read, despite being nominally short:
Other academic institutions (such as University of London; University of St Andrews;[1] University of Manchester and University of Bristol in the UK, and The University of Trinity College and Massey College at the University of Toronto, and the University of Hong Kong) also have high tables.
The half dozen examples should be removed. If, out of pride or whatever, the examples shall remain in some form, they should be put in a separate section, as a bulletpointed list.
--213.187.75.146 (talk) 08:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of inline examples
Talk:Senate House, Cambridge

message: The Senate house lawn has a replica of the Warwick Vasehttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/mariella.gregori/tim/cambridgesculpture/. There is a commons category for it. Not sure if this deserves inclusion, but people are obviously curious about it. HLHJ (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Warwick Vase]]
Talk:West Cambridge

message: The table for 'buildings' is appearing at the bottom of the page for some reason. I can't see an obvious way to fix it.
Juskei (talk) 10:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. It was missing a |} to close the table, although I'm surprised that made it go to the bottom of the page. the wub "?!" 18:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout issue 
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Wilco albums

message: The working definition is, "the albums and live albums of the Wilco discography" --PresN 23:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excluding their two joint albums with Billy Bragg - rst20xx (talk) 20:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic satisfies current criteria just fine. --PresN 23:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a note that one more article will need to be brought to FA status by 1 April 2009 per the new requirements for Featured topics. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: Only 2 of the 8 articles are FA/FL, getting the remaining 6 GA's to FA would be nice.  --PresN 23:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements
Talk:Shedding (biology)

message: Is this synonymous to Moult? I suggest a merge there--Lenticel (talk) 23:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page could include sloughing, which is snakes replacing old skin, whereas moult refers only to fur or hair, as I recall. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 23:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Natural Science Tripos

message: I removed "Postgraduates" from the sentence describing the part III course, part III Natural Sciences is considered an undergraduate masters course. Someone might want to re-write the sentence if they think the change makes it scan less well. Mccron (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

message: per the naming of other articles in this category, such as Mathematical Tripos --jftsang 18:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Natural Sciences Tripos
Talk:George Leo Thomas

message: There seems to be a debate about the proper style of address for Roman Catholic bishops in the United States, with editors adding and removing "His Excellency" before the "Most Reverend" in the title of the individual. It is important to distinguish between the "Address" and the "Salutation." It is customary not to use both together. In an article on an individual, it would seem to be best to use the "Address" in the written title of the individual (in this case, the Most Reverend", while noting that the "Salutation" is used when speaking to the individual or writing to the individual.Jbebeau (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of Address
Talk:Nonpartisanship

message: Please keep this article separate from "nonpartisan democracy".  Much of this article focuses on nonpartisan organizations which operate within a partisan democracy.  But, the article on "nonpartisan democracy" focuses on how a democracy itself might operate as nonpartisan.
206.14.93.37 23:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True enough. How about renaming this article to "nonpartisan race"? -Pete (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to nonpartisan democracy? 

message: No no reason to merge very different issuses Gang14 21:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too that they are different concepts, and am removing the "merge" tag. -Pete (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to independent? 

message: The National Rifle Association ... functions almost as an adjunct of the United States Republican Party. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has for many years functioned as almost a subsidiary organization to the United States Democratic Party.
All these claims need citations, otherwise they sound like POV, regardless of whether they are true or not.  I know both organisations champion causes that are typically associated with one or other of the big parties, but if that makes them partisan, then any single-issue campaign group would be if their cause is typically associated with a particular party.
Likewise, the claim about the labor unions being undeclared partisans of the Democratic Party needs sources.  In my own country, trade unions are usually publicly and officially associated with the Labour Party, or else despise it and think its sold them out.  Is the US situation that different?
Besides, even if all those claims are true and can be cited, do they really belong in the lede?
Wardog (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the lede 

message: The Lok Sabha (house of the people) or (Lower house} in India has space for two Nonpartisan members.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RCNesland (talk • contribs) 00:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lok Sabha
Talk:Astronomy departments in the University of Cambridge

message: I changed this sentence:
Although Astronomy has been taught at the Studium Generale in University of Cambridge since medieval times...
According to its article, Studium Generale is just a honor given to certain excellent universities. Presumably the sentence is just meant to mean "has been taught at that institution in Cambridge..." and calling it by that title seems rather out of place (in fact it doesn't even appear to be a title, but a kind of grade). If I've missed something, please let me know on this talk page if you revert the change. Quietbritishjim (talk) 16:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Studium Generale" is the medieval term with meaning that roughly corresponds to a modern research university, with at least 2 faculties of advanced study.  I agree that the medieval term is irrelevant in this context. Bluap (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studium Generale 
Talk:Rua Kenana Hepetipa

message: 121.73.90.127 (talk) 07:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that the background and the history sections of this article are covering the same topic often covering the same events. I'm thinking it is all covered in the History section which is better written so that leaves the background section for deletion. Andrewgprout (talk) 10:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplication
Talk:Port Revel

message: Does anyone know about any similar facilities elsewhere? I think I heard about one in the Masurian Lake District in Poland but don't recall the details. --88.101.236.53 (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any similar facilities to cross link in "see also" section? 

message: I'm pretty sure that this site was filmed with a movie starring Gerald Depardieu, he (his charakter) was trained here. He got angry and gave up his training. I don't remember the title. This should be mentioned here. --89.14.250.48 (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site of a film with Gerald Depardieu
Talk:Hider in the House (film)

message: Hello. Do you think that this article needs a plot section? The addition of one would improve upon the article. It has been quite some time since I have seen the film, otherwise I would attempt to write one myself. Thank you. (😺Galaxycat😺 talk 19:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , looks like the "Plot" section was removed without explanation yesterday. I've restored it. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Cavendish Laboratory

message: The section on molecular biology dominates this article. Why? And the paragraphs on the discovery of the structure of DNA would be better replaced by a brief note and a reference to the article(s) on DNA.
And the section on nuclear physics starts with the Cavendish's contribution to The Allies in World War II.
Much important work in atomic and nuclear physics was done at the Cavendish prior to WW II.
For example, Nobel prizes were awarded to the following researchers:
Rayleigh explained why the sky is blue and was the co-discoverer of the noble gas, argon.
JJ Thomson discovered the electron - a fundamental step in our understanding of the atom and a building block toward the development of quantum theory. His son, George Thomson, proved the de Broglie principle of wave-particle duality by means of an electron diffraction experiment.
Cockcroft & Walton "split the atom" (actually the atomic nucleus).
James Chadwick discovered the neutron.
WL Bragg and WH Bragg formulated the Bragg law of X-ray diffraction, later used for structural studies of proteins.
The above is just a brief list of advances in physics that came out of the Cavendish between 1900 and WW II. Yet none is mentioned in the article!
Marchino61 (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is Unbalanced and Ignores pre-World War II events 
Talk:Dale Hample

message: This page is not purely biographical; it is a documentation of the works of this academician (a rather exhaustive one at that). Notability comes from the list following the short amount of biographical information. This page does service to Professor Hample's career & works, it is not negative in any way, provides relevent information about this individual and also direct references to his work. The only thing in need of resolution is the disputed information and the copyright of the image. -- Shrout1 23:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is probably notable, if the academic record is approximately correct. But the claim of deliberate mis-statement should make an interesting discussion. But it is arguably less than responsible for you to have entered it without trying to verify the information. As a minimum, try google Scholar for the lit of publications. DGG (talk) 11:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The innovative sidenote seems to be something in the line of research of the person and seems to be producing a sort of Russell's paradox. Shyamal 12:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Jewish Bible

message: This article used to redirect to Tanakh. As part of the refinement of the Bible article to include articles on both the Christian and Jewish Bibles, these sections on the Jewish Bible, which was more general than the Tanakh, was placed here. Some of these paragraphs may better incorporated into Hebrew Bible or Tanakh. Luqman Skye 23:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Incorportation into Tanakh
Talk:Seeley Historical Library

message: I don't recall seeing hours of service given in other articles of this type. They look out of place in the lede. Fernando Danger (talk) 08:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that this isn't usual and removed at request of Seeley Librarian. Clb207 (talk) 10:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  hours of service 
Talk:Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge

message: This page needs a new picture of the museum - the current one reflects the old entrance which is not now in public use TMOLca (talk) 04:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)