Talk:Fuck the Millennium

message: I don't think we had a lot about in 2K/K2 Plant in our other articles - I've pasted in what usable stuff we had. I think it needs a tweak vis a vis sections, flow and the intro. Beyond that, though, if I recall correctly there is a sh*tload of stuff in the Library about the 2K comeback. Here would probably be as good a place as any to put it, even if it's about the Barbican appearance or the Pyramid rather than the single?
On that note, maybe 2K (band) should redirect here? (not a rhetorical question, still thinking abt it...) --kingboyk 19:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right, there's a load of stuff in the Library.  The Barbican appearance is relevant to the single.  I too was wondering whether 2K should redirect here, and I think it should, because "Millennium" was the only 2K project.  And K2 Plant Hire was at the same time, with "Millennium" ads placed by K2 Plant, so that incarnation could also redirect here.  I personally don't think K2 belongs with K Foundation: the only obvious connection is that "K Sera Sera" was incorporated into the Barbican debacle. --Vinoir 00:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put K2 into KF because it was "art", and 2K into KLF as music... I think if we actually move 2K and K2 Plant Hire, we should be looking at creating a new article... but for now let's see how we do with this one. --kingboyk 06:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes, I see.  The art/music divide seems reasonable to me. --Vinoir 07:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

text: (Decisively) "Yes!" :) --Vinoir 16:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Great! Thanks muchly. Bit more to do on themes, promotion, 2K, the name (I'll either factor your footnote in or include in the main text), and a sample (I've got the CD single but it steadfastly refuses to become an OGG, either directly or via MP3 format - it'll get sorted though).  Well done with the new categories by the way.  --00:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding this article 

message: Because it proved unpopular in our last FAC, I removed the seperate References section. You might therefore want to add a citation - and quite possibly my note about the status of Lazlo's FAQ - as a footnote. I would have done it myself but I don't know for sure where you got the info from/I'm lazy. --kingboyk 10:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discog 

message: *"acid house oriented" -> a better way of expressing that the song was acid-house based but a bit of a mixture of styles
--kingboyk 15:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jobs to do from Peer Review 

message: Congratulations! The Good article nomination for  has passed. Many thanks to all who were involved in the creation of this article.--SomeStranger(t|c) 14:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent news! Thanks ever so much for taking the time to review it. --kingboyk 14:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has passed 

message: The peer review has been concluded. When you're back Vinoir let's move this on to FAC. Let's also get some of the other articles promoted/dealt with, so we can move on to new things. (see Bill Drummond for some of my recent work). --kingboyk 08:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: I don't think that "the novel's final chapters reveal that the JAMs' leader is also one of The Five.[24]" is necessary in this article it is just fluff that adds weight, and if we get rid of that we can get rid of the spoiler warning too. - Drstuey 09:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you mind trimming out the bit you think is unneccessary? I'll then have a look at the edit and see if I agree or not :) I think you're right that we don't need to talk about "The Five" but I'm not sure how much you want trimmed and I quite like having the quote from the sleeve. --kingboyk 13:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would hazard that for as long as FTM appears to be the closing chapter in The KLF's story, the closing twist of Illuminatus! is relevant.  The sleeve remark is The JAMs' twist. --213.122.86.31 11:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illuminatus spoiler warning 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fuck the Millennium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111071100/http://www.klf.de/discography/ to http://www.klf.de/discography/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fuck the Millennium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327005822/http://www.mutelibtech.com/mute/2k/2k1.htm to http://www.mutelibtech.com/mute/2k/2k1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327005818/http://www.mutelibtech.com/mute/2k/2k2.htm to http://www.mutelibtech.com/mute/2k/2k2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060327002924/http://www.mutelibtech.com/mute/2k/2kpress.htm to http://www.mutelibtech.com/mute/2k/2kpress.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Kingboyk, thanks for your patience!  I have been quite wrapped up in an arb case, and I'm sorry for keeping you waiting so long. 
I did some WP:EMDASH fixing.
* these  include the KLF's "What Time Is Love?", and topically by the then-forthcoming end of the second millennium and the plans to celebrate it.  I cannot tell what this is saying at all ?
* The second paragraph of the lead seems to be repeating part of the first (with the What Time is Love) ... not sure why the two different sentences about it.
* A whole lot of the citations need dates and accessdates, samples:
: "Official Scottish Singles Sales Chart Top 100". Official Charts Company.
: "Swedishcharts.com – 2K – ***k the Millennium". Singles Top 100.
: "Official Singles Chart Top 100". Official Charts Company.
: "Official Dance Singles Chart Top 40". Official Charts Company.
: "Official Independent Singles Chart Top 50". Official Charts Company.
* a breakthrough track for Drummond and Cauty on two occasions ... needs a citation
Generally, this is in much better shape now, and should be able to avoid a FAR, but the lead isn't there yet.  The person who could most help bring this over the line is  so I hope he will jump in and help fix any remaining issues.  Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  22:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued review 

message: Is it just me or does the name seem a bit to sweary 2A02:C7E:17C6:1F00:15CC:E091:C58A:194D (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title is inappropriate