lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation/American animation work group

message: I am proposing to merge The Legend of Zelda (TV series) into The Super Mario Bros. Super Show! and would appreciate comments. Eldomtom2 (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hello everyone! I would like your input on a discussion on the List of The Owl House characters talk page, about whether to split off the section for Amity Blight into its own page. Currently, the page draft is available at Draft:Amity Blight, and consensus in this discussion is important to determine whether this character should get its own article. Thanks and I hope to see your comments. Historyday01 (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split of page for Amity Blight from [[List of The Owl House characters]] page 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]] 

message: Hello everyone! I would like your input on a discussion at Talk:Criticism of the Walt Disney Company#Splitting off content to Criticism of Walt Disney Animation Studios about whether to split off content from five sub-sections about Walt Disney Animation Studios to the Criticism of Walt Disney Animation Studios, in order to ensure that the page complies with WP:SIZESPLIT. Consensus in this discussion is important to determine whether such a this split is warranted or not. Thanks and I hope to see your comments. Historyday01 (talk) 00:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split of [[Criticism of the Walt Disney Company]] page 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Lion King II: Simba's Pride#Changes to the plot and lead, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[The Lion King II: Simba&#39;s Pride]]
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/LEIA

message: In response to this: "...gave his/her reason here but did not list AfD properly."
I followed the process listed here, but when I followed the link I was unable to create the page.
Is that what the comment was about? I don't know what else could possibly be considered "proper" (although I did everything I could to follow that procedure outlined)
::The issue is that without creating an account you cannot complete an Afd as you can't create a new article. Create an account ( requires no personal info at all ) and you can do the entire process - Peripitus (Talk) 09:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Johnny Cash – Biography

message: This whole bio/career separation idea needs a lot of work to help it make sense. It is a little jarring.  The "career" page should have  something in the heading about this separation because it is atypical. -- 75.24.211.225 06:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoa. Now that I have skimmed this material, I can see that a lot of it belongs back on the "career" page. This is going to be tricky. We should try hard to avoid a lot of duplication. We might even need some guidelines because he made a lot of high-profile appearances that were as much about his celebrity as his music. -- 75.24.211.225 06:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Folks: One day ago, User:Lincalinca broke out this "biography" section from the main "Johnyy Cash" page.  What he did does not represent a lot of work or new information.  What this page is a just a copy of what was in the main JC page (which has since been restored).  This is not new info, so please do not blindly defend it according to some rule.  If we leave it around, people are going to start to develope this page, which is probably not a good thing.  I think that what was needed was a better thought-out and execute attempt to delegate some parts of the main JC page to some other page.  Would the non-contributing reverters and rule-citers please stay out of the process?  -- 64.175.42.87 19:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will let you rule-oriented people figure out how best to handle this page. I am going to ignore it as a bit of unfortunate untidiness and hope that nobody spends their time trying to further develop it. -- 64.175.42.87 19:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spinning out of control

message: If merge is the correct tag, then wonder.  I do not believe that there is anthing on this page that is not already on the Johnny Cash or Johnny Cash lists pages. -- 64.175.42.87 00:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: God forbid that we do anything out-of-process, but would some kind admin just shoot this dead horse of an article when the time for the "merger discussion" is over? -- 67.116.253.187 23:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, an admin can't just delete a page without consensus from other editors. See Wikipedia:Guide to deletion for the various options available. --Pak21 08:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I and User:Cromag recently revamped Johnny Cash discography and started album pages for most of Cash's catalog.  If Johnny Cash is getting too crowded, then add album and song specific info to the relevant album pages.  I think that is a more natural fix than spining off information to this page or Johnny Cash lists  Alcuin 03:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Build the album pages
Talk:Tilpin

message: We only dab when dabbing is necessary. It is not required in this case: the page should be moved to Turpin by an Admin. --Mais oui! 06:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: it's written reims in this article , but in english we write rheims with a H.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.66.146.209 (talk) 10:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rheims or Reims ?
Talk:(FLA)vour of the Weak

message: this album cover image is WRONG!  this is the cover for Tactical Neural Implant!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.216.116 (talk • contribs) 
:All better now. -- Xinit 07:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong image

message: Remorse doesn't appear to be included in this album. Check this fan site www.mindphaser.com and the official record company Metropolis. I removed the song. Esquizoide 19:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remorse
Talk:Counselor (disambiguation)

message: It is necessary to create this page because counselor is a generic term with many meaningswhicky1978 talk 06:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: page creation

message: The disambiguation page has recently been moved from Counselor to Counselor (disambiguation), but since Counselor redirects to Counselor (disambiguation), the disambiguation is not needed in the title. Disambiguation is only added to titles where the main title is not the default location. -- 03:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. This was an uncontroversial of a cut and paste move. Talk:Counselor already had a comment, so I haven't merged this page with that one. older ≠ wiser 20:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Rheopecty

message: The reference to high-income countries sounds inappropriate, rings of social commentary...   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.5.120 (talk) 11:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Is egg-white rheopectic?
How about butter/cream? 121.72.240.101 06:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Examples

message: This should be at Rheopexy. "Rheopecty" seems to be an error formed from "rheopectic"; search in Google Books to see how rare this form is. 81.152.72.174 (talk) 23:01, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad entry title

message: "An incorrect example often used to demonstrate rheopecty is cornstarch mixed with water ... cornstarch in water is actually a dilatant fluid" I disagree, that example is not incorrect, cornstarch in water really is rheopectic. Whether or not cornstarch in water is dilatant or not has nothing to do with whether it is rheopectic. Sand in water is dilatant because it expands under shear, but it is not rheopectic. Like all rheopectic fluids, cornstarch in water exhibits an increase in viscosity with shear - there's absolutely no need for the viscosity to build up slowly with time for the fluid to be rheopectic, an instantaneous change suffices.Mollwollfumble (talk) 01:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I disagree, cornstarch in water really is rheopectic

message: I don't follow the logic of rheopexy being useful for shock absorption/impact-stress lowering materials. Why would the time-dependent increase of viscosity make such a material suitable for that purpose? It is my understanding that dilatant materials are in fact the materials of choice for this sort of application. There are also no citations for any of the claims in the paragraph about applications.
Bonks1 (talk) 13:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Supposed interest in rheopectic materials

message: It is indeed a rare phenomena! So rare that few examples are given in the article. 
The 1989 Honda Civic Wagovan was available with automatic-engaging four wheel drive, where the clutch in the four wheel drive transfer case was engaged by a rheopectic fluid. When a difference in surface velocity between the clutch discs that connect the front wheel drive and the rear wheels of the vehicle caused shear, the rheopectic fluid "stiffened up" and transferred torque between the clutch discs to the rear wheels. I sure would like to know what the fluid is they used. Perhaps they used cornstarch? I doubt it, that stuff would cook when it got hot! 
Oh, the article forgot to mention whether the cornstarch was the uncooked raw powdered stuff straight out of the box from the grocery store mixed with water, or if you have to mix it with water and make stovetop gravy out of it for it to be rheopectic. I never noticed any rheopectic gravy on my mashed potatoes. However, I've had plenty of rheopectic mashed potatoes. How come mashed potatoes wasn't mentioned? Linstrum (talk) 21:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need more examples
Talk:Wild Magic

message: \
Due to a vandal, the plot summary was erased and I can't seem to get it back...... COuld someone please do this? Stealth (talk) 10:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went back a couple of edits in the history and restored it from there. It's fixed now. :) -- KittyRainbow (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuck
Talk:Devil to the Belt

message: Does it make sense to have articles on omnibus releases, rather than on individual novels - Heavy Time and Hellburner - or whole series or settings - "The Company Wars" or "Alliance/Union universe"? -- Danny Yee 07:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think in some cases the omnibus is better, as I don't think we could write something for (or that it would merit) an article for each of the books, but as a whole, you could write a quality article for this Omnibus.  As for the settings, Alliance/Union Universe, yes.  The Company Wars?  I don't know. Bo-Lingua 14:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with the omnibus is that someone reading Heavy Time as a separate novel won't think to look up Devil to the Belt - and that article isn't even linked to from C.J. Cherryh!  Also, what happens when different combinations of novels end up published in different omnibuses by different publishers? Individual novel titles seem more stable, and more fundamental. -- Danny Yee 07:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heavy Time and Hellburner both exist as redirects to Devil to the Belt. The reason you're not seeing these links in C.J. Cherryh is because they are in C. J. Cherryh bibliography. Yes, a novel could end up in more than one omnibus, but that fact would be made clear in the respective omnibus articles. See also Talk:C. J. Cherryh bibliography for a discussion on the decision to group some of the novels. --Bruce1ee 08:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense.  I missed the whole discussion in the bibliography talk, it seems you guys have it all planned out! -- Danny Yee 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I could see The Company Wars as either a section in the Alliance-Union universe article, or as its own article, depending on how much detail you wanted to put into it.  One to three paragraphs, probably a section in the A-U artcle.  More than that, possibly gets its own.  Fairsing 17:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles / omnibus editions
Talk:Lotus seed

message: Can they also be called 通心百莲子 (I've got a package that is labeled that in grass script) or 白莲子?  Badagnani 04:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name? 

message: 
Can someone fill this in?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimension of seed
Talk:List of Australian Amphibian Genera

message: Here are my suggestions for this article. Firstly, we move it to Amphibians of Australia (like Birds of Australia), so it is a daughter article of Fauna of Australia. This would then require a small explanation stating that Anurans are the only amphibians in Aus. Secondly, the best photos should be used for each genus. Most are good, but I think a few have better alternatives:
*Limnodynastes photo is too dark, and you cannot see it as a thumbnail. I prefer Fir's image of Lim. dumerili for thumbnail size. 
*Mixophyes; I prefer my image, current one is pretty dull, is it from a film camera?
*Uperoleia. Don't know which one to replace it with, but at that size, it looks like a black sqaure.
Thanks --liquidGhoul 07:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article should be moved, List of Australian Amphibian Genera is just too long to write. I would suggest using the Uperoleia tyleri image over the one that is already there.--Tnarg 12345 08:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done as requested above (haven't moved it yet), it looks better. Froggydarb 09:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Highland Creek

message: Highland Creek is also a Village! in that it has a Main Street, some cross streets, and a traffic light!
Its inhabitants come in from the weeks work' in the fields to fill up the tractor with fuel, to go to th market for groceries, and to Sip a cup of coffee outside the Village bakery, when the weather is nice.
It has a post office and its own zip or postal code, plus it has its own festival every year in the 2nd saturday in June, that has been running continuously since 1985. See pictures of festival events here
Highland Creek Heritage Festival
--Richard416282 07:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highland Creek Village 

message: There are two entities named "Highland Creek".
One is the branch watercourse that runs through Scarborough, the other is the Unincorprated Enclave of Scarborough that is also a Neighborhood in its own right. 
The Neighborhood was created as part of the Highway Carriage trade and has been around since the 1880's, additional historical information is being researched.
Richard416282 06:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation Needed 

message: Highland Creek (Lake Ontario) was recently created. It is a duplicate of this page with some additions. There is no need for two articles. Furthermore there is no need to move it to a sub-designation because there is no other Highland Creek article. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 11:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The pre-existing "Highland Creek" article treats a river and a place, which should be properly treated in two separate articles. In addition, when researching the river on the Atlas of Canada, I discovered several Highland Creeks just in the province of Ontario alone. Thus, I created the new article with the sub-designation "Lake Ontario", porting old information from "Highland Creek" and adding in the results of new research. It is my intention to create a new article about the place, perhaps as "Highland Creek, Toronto"; and to change the pre-existing article "Highland Creek" into a disambiguation page, in which one would reference the new articles, including the place, and the other Highland Creeks discovered in Ontario. All this would obviously mean not merging this new article back in. I just haven't gotten around to the additional changes yet. My fault as it has clearly caused some confusion. Any other comments or suggestions welcomed. papageno (talk) 06:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the mergefrom proposal and made this a disambiguation page. The existing content has been separated into Highland Creek (Lake Ontario) for the river, and Highland Creek, Toronto for the community. papageno (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate page (merger proposal)
Talk:Daniel Passent

message: To skandaliczny biogram. Sa drugorzedne informacje o rodzinie i niepotwierdzonych związkach z SB, a nawet słowa nie ma o tym, że to Passent odnalazł pamiętniki Eichmana. Przecież to było jedno z najważniejszych osiągnięć w historii polskiego, a nawet światowego, dziennikarstwa.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.160.234.129 (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the wording a bit since the one used made this info a bit too controversial and could lead to possible legal action.
Nirrod 12:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial Past

message: I have removed the following sentence: 
:Until 1989 he was a secret communist agent "Zebra" and got money for finking.
I did not find any information supporting this claim. Statement like this (if it is true) has to be supported by giving a trustworthy source. Stotr 07:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have been unnoticed vandalism from 1 June 2006.  Good catch. -- Jonel | Speak 12:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agent "Zebra"? 

message: The Polish version of this page has been the subject of an edit war, over the question of whether he had been working as a spy for the communist government.  Today the Polish page was protected. 
Two of 
of the IP addresses involved in the war, 
*, :pl:Special:Contributions/83.30.33.212
*,  :pl:Special:Contributions/83.22.240.200
have also edited the English page recently.
The discussion in the Polish wikipedia mentioned an 
article in the conservative newspaper Dziennik, dated April 18, 2007.  The article reports that (according to a recent edition of Polish Television's program "misja specjalna") Passent has worked as a spy under the codename "Daniel", and later "John".
However, the most recent article about Passent that I could find at TVP's website was from January 2007.  It does not claim that Passent was a spy. 
-- Austrian 16:22, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist spy? 
Talk:Ludwig-Musser

message: Why is Buddy not listed here? Maybe he did not "officially" endorse Ludwig (he's not listed on their site), but certainly a career as "the world's greatest drummer" spanning most of the 20th century - sitting behind a Ludwig kit - warrants inclusion in this list.
Alangree 20:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddy Rich?

message: I think this article should have a better picture. Neil Peart hasnt endorsed Ludwig in years, as is noted in the article, and the drums shown arent really representative of the ludwig style. when people think of ludwig they think of ringo or bonzo. i think there should be a pic of ringos oyster pearl up top,and then a pic of bonzos vistalites (maybe the reissue?) by the section about vistalites, or the endorsers section. --Atticus2020 08:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Pic

message: im deleting keith moon off the list, he used premier drums always, never ludwig.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.76.238.105 (talk) 06:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are incorrect.  Though he never did a Ludwig enodorsement (and is best known for playing Premier), Keith Moon did use Ludwig sets (almost exclusively) from July, 1964 through September, 1965 (The High Numbers/early Who period).  http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/gear/drums/drums6165.html His first Ludwig set was a black oyster pearl Ludwig (similar to Ringo's, but with a Suprphonic snare), which he used from July, 1964 through May 1965.  http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/gear/drums/drums6165.html His second Ludwig kit was a silver sparkle kit with an extra floor tom (and again, Supraphonic snare). http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/gear/drums/drums6165.html  This is the set that he is seen playing in several 1965 performances in the movie, The Kids Are Alright.  It was with these sets that he played on most of the Who's earliest singles, and on much of their first album.  Moon went to Premier in late '65.  Moon sometimes continued to use a Ludwig Supraphonic snares with his Premier kits after 1965.http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/gear/drums/drums6870.html Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keith Moon 

message: Buddy Rich was actually a long-time WFL/Ludwig endorser. He was signed by William F. Ludwig Jr. to endorse 1st WFL and later Ludwig at different times from the late 1940's to the early 1980's. Karen Carpenter played clear Vistalites, not silver sparkle. Ludwig never made silver sparkle Vistalites. Carl Palmer also played Vistalites in the early days of Emerson, Lake, and Palmer. However, his infamous stainless steel kit was made by Premier, not Ludwig. Interestingly, Palmer is once again a Ludwig Endorser today. Lars Ulrich speaks of keeping his Ludwig Black Beauty in a safety deposit box at a San Francisco bank in a 1980's Modern Drummer article, but he was never an endorser. 
Goalie31 20:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion/Changes
Talk:Berlei

message: Was there a TV mini-series about Fred Burley????  I am familiar with a movie called Undercover that was about Burley and Berlei.  Can we get a source or reference for this information?  --RichardAmes 08:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TV series?

message: I think there are three subjects here:
1. The brand (or trademark) 'Berlei'.
2. The company and companies (Berlei Limited) which were originally Australian.  Then the NZ and UK decendents.  The various takeovers and splitups..... Hestia, Dunlop Australia, Pacific Brands, etc.  In this connection other people may be mentioned: Hurley, Michael Hershon.
3. The bio of the Founder.
RichardAmes 18:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of page 

message: The Powerhouse Museum in Sydney has a lot of Berlei material.  A copy of their page is at:
http://www.webcitation.org/5cURSP5zj  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariconte (talk • contribs) 06:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powerhouse reference 

message: Berlei is a brand of ladies underwear.  The brand now belongs to Pacific Brands and they are the entity that arranges the manufacturing.  Regards, Ariconte (talk) 05:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy re Pacific Brands manufacturing  

message: I wonder if anybody would be interested in adding in some of the controversial things that Fred Burley had said or done. For instance his support for Apartheid http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article59469483 etc? Petedavo talk contributions 04:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial Founder