lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2008 electoral calendar

message: Hmm..this template doesn't seem to include the local elections. Should we add them? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 22:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, we only include elections for entities which are de facto independent *OR* have an ISO 3166-1 code. —Nightstallion 23:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does that apply to Kosovo? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, good point. Mh. I suppose it could qualify as a sui generis case, as it is under the adminstration of UNMIK at the time of the election. —Nightstallion 23:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do gubernatorial US elections pass this criterium? —GMMarques 12:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, why should they? —Nightstallion 21:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I just didn't want to remove them without being sure. —GMMarques 10:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local elections? 

message: These articles need major attention, cleanup, data and standardization. Please help. 
*Elections in 1990
*Elections in 1991
*1992 election
Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  help! 

message: Why is the text "2008 presidential election" redirects here. For the 2008 US presidential election, see United States presidential election, 2008. at the top of the page? The US election is not the only presidential election this year, so either they should all be listed in the disambiguation link, or none should be present. Seeing as all 2008 presidential elections are listed in this article, I would favour the latter. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 09:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "2008 presidential election" 

message: According to this link, the Maldives will have a presidential election by 10 October 2008. Yes, it could be before, but that isn't quite the same as Unknown. How do we indicate this in our article? I believe the info could be helpful to the citizenry. Misterantithesis (talk) 19:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maldives
Talk:HSC-8

message: Coren Search Bot is in error as the article it is referncing is simply a copied word-for-word version of the wikipedia article since its inception. NevyanSD 06:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, CorenSearchBot did a good job of detecting this copy of a Wikipedia article without attribution, which is a GFDL violation. -- But|seriously|folks  06:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text copied from the Wikipedia article HS-8. -- But|seriously|folks  06:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: This page should be merged with HS-8, as HSC-8 is the same squadron as was HS-8.  The squadron, unless this was an unprecedented instance, was NOT disestablished and then reestablished the same day with a different name.  The squadron, as has been done countless times, was redesignated.  The aircraft and mission might have changed, but the people, command structure, and traditions of HS-8 remain.  When a squadron disestablishes, it goes away forever.  The Sailors, equipment, etc. are disbursed to other units.  Even if, according to the Navy, a squadron is "reborn" with colors from the past (as with VF-111 / VFC-111 Sundowners), the lineage has been broken.  They are two separate squadrons.  NOT the case here.  E2a2j (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Malignus Youth

message: I'd like info on how the band met and came together.  Maybe Mike Armenta can add this information?  Also, there needs to be way more citing references...  Even if it's interviews or references with band members, that would be great.  --76.171.172.73 06:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/malignus-youth-play-at-rips-in-phoenix-on-march-13-11454044
https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/malignus-youth-10068992
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Gimme_Indie_Rock/D_eKBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0
MRR #114/Nov ’92
http://www.trialanderrorcollective.com/interviews/mike-armenta-on-the-past-present-and-future-of-malignus-youthCDaniel (talk) 06:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References for later use
Talk:Treago Castle

message: The current www.treago.co.uk site is sparse and empty, however the older versions found at archive.org do contain some useful information.  The pages also refer to a forth cottage called "Butlers", it could be that this is now used for accomodation.
The old webpages also appear to indicate that the heated pool maybe be available for public use (presumably at a cost) with the wording "(open 10am-7pm everyday)".
—Sladen 06:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old website

message: The William Herbert disambiguity article gives two possibilities:
* William Herbert, 1st Earl of Pembroke (1468 creation)
* William Herbert, 1st Earl of Pembroke (1551 creation)
I've gone for the later one for the moment, as otherwise that would put the construction of Treago quite a bit earlier.  —Sladen 07:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: William Herbert

message: I have heard a strange tale which I assume relates to Treago Castle. Sometime in the 1980's an aged tradesman claimed that as a boy c 1900 he had assisted in some building work, and had broken a hole through a wall to discover a long cavity with the gleam of gold at the end, which he re-sealed and kept quiet about for 80 years. He thought it had looked like the "lost crown of Britain" (supposedly broken up and sold by Cromwell). After his solicitor negotiated a deal all parties gathered at the location with suitable tools, but he was unable to recognize the spot - "everything had changed".
86.187.162.49 (talk) 22:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant yarn. This is why I love the talk pages of obscure country houses. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:27, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treasure myth
Talk:Dumarao

message: 124.83.52.89 (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipino
Talk:Judy Francesconi

message: Judy Francesconi is currently the most famous lesbian fine-art photographer in the U.S. Her work has been featured in galleries from coast to coast and she recently was featured on the WE television series Secret Lives of Women, Lipstick Lesbians episode. A Web search will reveal that her art is on display and has been available in stores and galleries across the world. I will be adding other published works to her bibliography, plus references to her work and reviews.
 - appears to have some media coverage. Addhoc 13:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Most famous

message: This article comes with a long list of "sources". As an example:
:*(2003) The Lesbian Sex Book: A Guide for Women Who Love Women. Wendy Caster, Rachel Kramer Bussel, and Julie May. Alyson Books. .
How can such a book be a source for info about this photographer? -- Hoary (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?
Talk:Trojan planet

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-10-6 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Hello - I removed the prod and wiktionary tags. This topic has encyclopedic depth. There is a significantly scholarly literature about the topic: e.g. and e.g.. While the article is currently only a definition it could expanded into a full encyclopedia article. Debivort 03:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prodding / Wiktionarying
Talk:Josef Jacobs

message: At the end of the article, it states: "He was at that time the last surviving bearer of the Pour le Merite order." Jacobs died in 1978 - however Ernst Junger, another WW1 German officer, also had the Blue Max, as it is sometimes called. Junger died in 1998 at 102 yrs. Perhaps we are trying to say that Jacobs was the last pilot alive w/ the Pour le Merite?...I'll await comments, but if there are no objections (stating verifiable sources), I'll delete that claim soon. Engr105th (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Remvd the line above...by the way, Ernst Junger's Wiki bio makes the same claim (that he was the last living recipient). Based on their dates of death, Junger has this distinction...If anyone reverts the Jacobs article, please qualify the claim (last pilot recipient; last Bavarian, or whatever)...Engr105th (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Last living Pour le Merite recipient ?

message: B class assessment re-confirmed. However, please read on. The introduction reads as follows, "Jacobs joined the Luftwaffe reserves as a major, but refused to join the Nazi party." His refusal to join the Nazis is not in the body of the article. It needs to be added and cited. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 21:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: B class re-review
Talk:Judith Neuffer

message: Judy was the second woman to receive her Naval Aviator wings. Barbara Ann Allen received her wings on 22 February 1974, one week prior to Judy 47.185.22.245 (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First to receive wings
Talk:Balete, Aklan

message: I'll list here possible sources for this town's history.
* http://a-river-called-jal-o.blogspot.com/2010/09/town-by-jal-o-river-time-line.html
* http://balete.tripod.com/history.html
--Ed558 (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 
Talk:Banga, Aklan

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.angelfire.com/wizard2/johnny_ricablanca/barangay.HTML. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The material was added here in 2011, but the Wayback Machine has a copy of the external web page from 2005. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:16, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Kalibo

message: The discussion about the airport in this article is ludicrous. No such flights to Seoul are available, and there is no citation anywhere in this article that flights to Singapore, China and other destinations will be available. I've deleted all of this garbage.John (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Madalag

message: One liner, unsourced. Most likely not passing notability. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Galicia, Madalag, Aklan]] into [[Madalag#Barangays]]
Talk:Windows Task Scheduler

message: Windows Vista uses Task Scheduler 2.0 to run various system-level tasks [4], as such, the Task Scheduler service cannot be disabled any more. However it can be disabled with a simple registry tweak, google it, as we don't dear speak about it with MS watching and IP logging.
- Is this 2nd sentence really required?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.35.229.129 (talk) 01:16, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  disabling 

message: I'd like to know the path to the folder where the scheduled tasks are stored.  I get a message when I open Task Scheduler that several tasks are corrupt or have been tampered with.  I could restore them from a backup if I knew where to look.
74.131.178.34 (talk) 03:50, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  task folders? 

message: Not all tasks are listed. Extra steps are required to view the "hidden" tasks:
"you can view hidden tasks that are run by programs if you log on to the computer by using administrator credentials. To view hidden tasks, follow these steps:
Click Start, click Run, type control schedtasks in the Open box, and then click OK.
On the Advanced menu, click View Hidden Tasks." http://support.microsoft.com/kb/883605
"By default, hidden tasks are not shown in the Task Scheduler user interface. You can view hidden tasks when Show Hidden Tasks is selected in the View menu. You make a task hidden when you click the Hidden check box on the General tab of the Task Properties or Create Task dialog box."
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc749579%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
-96.237.4.73 (talk) 21:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden Tasks 

message: Where can we find a complete list of result codes?
The only list we could find is http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/windows/desktop/aa383604(v=vs.85).aspx
However, there are cases where the code is not in that list (for exemple 0x7FFBD3FA).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabfra (talk • contribs) 10:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error and Success constants list
Talk:Mé Aktsom

message: While editing the text I discovered large portions of it were copypasted from The Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism Ogress smash! 22:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free material 

message: I have checked the text and made a couple of small changes, including changing the text in one place so it can't be misconstrued as a "copypaste". I have also added two more important references to the translations by Thomas and Emmerick, and also inserted them as footnotes. I think the article should be fine now - so I have removed the two tags added as in the previous note on "Non-free material." Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 00:38, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Agno River

message: I found one in Flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/bingramos/50103908/in/photostream/.
--βritandβeyonce (talk•contribs) 10:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional image

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Agno (Fluss). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#Agno (Fluss) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Agno (Fluss)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Agüeybaná

message: Per wannabe_kate Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 02:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: This RfA originally included 6 co-noms, as seen here. I notified the users, of course, when I removed them, as suggested in the discussion section of this RfA. This is just for anyone who's curious :-) --Agüeybaná 15:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) However, I see that you didn't notify Politics Rule? Correct me if I'm wrong. 86.137.25.192 18:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pat is no longer actively with us. Anyway, he did not nominate me himself; it was copied and pasted from by last RfA by Hirohisat. I feel as if it is not necessary to notify him. I will, of course, do it, if you, or anyone else, request it :-) --Agüeybaná 19:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh right. How strange... never mind ;) 86.137.25.192 19:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-noms 

message: Eddie, I'm just curious to know what your thought-process is behind removing admin tools from admins who don't use them for five months?  I could conjecture, but I'm more interested in what you have to say about it.  Also, what do you think about RfA candidates who don't nominate themselves for adminship, but accept and are unlikely to use the tools?  Are they power-hungry too?  Into The Fray T/C 19:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The policy regarding removal of sysop rights because of inactivity can be found at commons:Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. Anything you want and don't want to know about that can be found there. What do I think about it? Nothing; I just entirely agree with it. Regarding your second question, yes, the same principles apply. --Agüeybaná 20:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Am I wrong or does your response seem a little ... terse?  I fully admit I could be.  If you thought my question was argumentative, I apologize; I was really just looking for your thought process, not a debate.  I read the policy and the corresponding talk page.  Thanks.  Into The Fray T/C 21:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 5
Talk:Agus River

message: # Provincial boundary. It says that the Agus river forms the boundary between Lanao del Norte and Lanao del Sur but a look at any map shows that this is not the case because Agus River cuts through both provinces.
# Highest waterfall. I've been taught this in grade school but I've come across references that say there are taller waterfalls in Mindanao. I think one is in Davao Oriental and another is in Bislig City, Surigao del Sur. See this Google search.
--seav (talk) 02:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a reference listing the Philippines' tallest waterfalls, but not sure if it can be considered reliable: . It says Aliwagwag Falls in Davao Oriental is taller. Doing a Google search for Aliwagwag falls seems to provide plenty of references saying that it is considered the tallest in the country. We can probably speculate that in the 1970s, Aliwagwag Falls hasn't been discovered yet. --seav (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual concerns 
Talk:Agusan River

message: I think it should not be merged to the Agusan article (Philippine political subdivision) because it is an important geographical landmark in the Philippines and Mindanao in particular and should have its own wiki article.
Kleomarlo (talk) 08:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing the merge form/suggestion
Talk:Pansipit River

message: If anyone has any pictures of the river, boating, fish pens, just the surrounding terrain, aerial shots, etc. feel free to post them on commons. Thanks! Shrumster (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology

message: I don't see anything in the article to support the addition of :Category:2020 disestablishments in New Zealand, and this news article indicates that while the coronavirus situation is hurting the institute financially, it's still a going concern. It opened a new research facility last month.-gadfium 01:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah; too right. I need to go through the 16 articles that I added to that category and explain that they all get subsumed into New Zealand Institute of Skills & Technology on 1 April. Schwede66 01:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Disestablishment?
Talk:Hyatt Regency Hong Kong, Tsim Sha Tsui

message: This hotel project has been formally announced as the new Hyatt Regency at Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong and not Hotel Panorama. (See Chinese wikipedia.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngchikit (talk • contribs) 06:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the error.Shrimp wong (talk) 11:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyatt Regency Hong Kong and [[Hotel Panorama]]
Talk:South Edmonton Common

message: I took a look at the list of tennants.  A lot of these are major chains and other well known companies.  So, I did a little cross searching, and where I found a Wikipedia article on the company, I added a link.  If the company was in the list with an external link, I redirected it to the Wikipedia article.  There were a few where I couldn't be 100% certain the article I found related to the company in question.  For a couple, where I know they are divisions of another retailer (e.g. Thyme Maternity is a unit of Reitmans), I linked to the parent if there was no article on the company in question.  Still lots of gaps, but what they hey.  That's what other Wikipedians are for.  :)
Johntwrl 08:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennants List
Talk:Moral Zeitgeist

message: The Moral Zeitgeist is not prescriptive: it is an observation. The idea of the Moral Zeitgeist does not specify a theory of morality or a mechanism of the change of morality. Instead, it is an empirical observation based on, say, the history of legal systems.
It seems that Dawkins leans towards an absolute morality. --Matthayichen (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Moral Relativism: Don't Merge 

message: The article implies that the notion is a fairly recent one in ethics. It would help to put it in context with other, similar, but very older positions of moral relativism that Dawkins ignores (for whatever reason). I propose an article merge would be helpful.--85.179.203.248 (talk) 08:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. Dawkins just gave moral relativism a fancy term. Shashamula (talk) 22:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of Philosophical Context: Merge 

message: It may very well be that Dawkins "introduced" the public to this combination of words.  However, "moral zeitgeist" has a clear meaning by virtue of simply chaining the two words together.  So, is it that Dawkins coined this term, introduced it, or introduced it to the public audience (or at least reader's of his book) and his particular interpretation of the meanings inherent in that term?   I've been saying moral zeitgeist for over twenty years, but amongst acquaintances (to their annoyance I am sure).  I'm certain other have too.  Is my point clear?  I'm wondering if the phrasing can be a bit less of an implication that Richard Dawkins invented this combination of words or has any jurisdiction over its usage.  Perhaps what is said here is already accurate.  I'm unsure, but it could be clarified I think. --Davidp (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dawkins Introduced? 

message: WP:NEO sums up that policy as referring to "A new term doesn't belong in Wikipedia unless there are reliable sources specifically about the term — not just sources which mention it briefly or use it in passing". The book The God Delusion discusses the term (not just mentioning it briefly or using it in passing), and the article itself links to a lecture specifically about Moral Zeitgeist. So it is extremely clear that this article does not meet the requirements of WP:NEO, and so should not be deleted. Additionally this article has been rated to be of mid importance on the importance scale for philosophy - as such it would be a loss to Wikipedia were it deleted. I would ask that RucasHost to be a bit slower and more thoughtful before introducing the deletion template on articles as at least in this case doing so reduces the quality of Wikipedia. --Robhu 11:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion