Talk:MarkLogic

message: Here's a good defense of MarkLogic on Slashdot by a programmer who was familiar with it. Now if we could find a WP:RS to say the same thing, that would make a good WP:NPOV section about MarkLogic's role in healthcare.gov.
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4480323&cid=45507161
Re: follow the money (Score:5, Insightful)
by MyDixieWrecked (548719) Alter Relationship on Sunday November 24, 2013 @11:07AM (#45507161) 
I used marklogic when I worked at a previous job and after learning how it worked and understanding it better, it made our jobs incredibly easy. It just had a serious learning curve.
Marklogic is a nosql db, that uses XML for its object format and xquery for its query language. This thing is NOT mongodb. It actually works really well and allows for complex data modeling with the ability to do joins and have transactional isolation in making changes to the data as well as a really solid content processing framework with pipelining and all that jazz.
Now, I can't imagine a reason for using marklogic, or any non-relational db for a project like this. The only clue is that marklogic has a lot of government contracts; mostly for the military. So maybe that's why it was used. But the fact that they chose a database system that they weren't experts in for a project that had so much visibility speaks volumes on how mismanaged this whole project was.
--Nbauman (talk) 23:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  healthcare.gov 

message: The UK Subsidiary "MARKLOGIC (UK) LIMITED" is a known affiliate of SDG REGISTRARS LIMITED & SDG SECRETARIES LIMITED, shell companies for the SCL Group.
Should this be included somewhere on the page?
sourcing: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06080277/officers
SCL_Group
2601:1C0:4601:6419:8098:82B0:D503:9586 (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK subsidiary 

message: In 2009 IDC mentioned MarkLogic in a report as one of the top Innovative Information Access Companies with under $100 million in revenue. That same year the term NoSQL picked up steam as a description of a database providing a mechanism for storing and retrieving data that is modeled in means other than the tabular relations used in a relational database (e.g. key-value, wide column, graph, and/or document).
NoSQL providers posted revenue of $20 million in 2011 with projections for rapid growth. MarkLogic would have fallen under that category even from its earliest years, and today, this remains a category in which MarkLogic fits. The even newer term and category of “Multi-model” describes MarkLogic, too, given MarkLogic’s ability to store and query documents, graph data, or relational data from a single database.
PImbres (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional context for History section 

message: * It is not known what changes are requested to be made, specifically, if the text above is to be added (and if it is, where) or removed. Please state your desired changes in the form of "Change x to y using z". 
 
	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
	A reference which verifies the requested change
Please change:
*The Sun's diameter is 25 miles.
to read as:
*The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles.
using as a reference:
* 
Whether the text in the edit request is proposed additions or deletions should be clarified. Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed. 
Regards,  Spintendo  03:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 17-JAN-2020

message: * Add an Owner field in the gray box on the right and list "Progress Software" as owner.
* End the first paragraph with "In February 2023, MarkLogic was acquired by Progress for $355 Million."
* The acquisition has been noted on the Progress Software page already.
* https://www.kmworld.com/Articles/News/News/Progress-officially-acquires-MarkLogic-157030.aspx
* Yogesh Gupta (January 3, 2023). "Progress to Acquire NoSQL Database Pioneer, MarkLogic". Progress. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
TorryC (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page.  Actualcpscm (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Thank you. TorryC (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make changes to reflect acquisition by Progress Software