Talk:First Capital Connect

message: Has anyone got any up to date stats for FCC on the Thameslink route? There's been a considerable dip in service over the last few weeks with lots of delays and cancellations. It's a pretty poor service on the Thameslonk route at the best of times. It's got a lot worse recently.
I don't have figures unfortunately, but the disruptions have been severe, and subject to much discussion, so I've added a short section on them, and the industrial dispute which has caused them. Smells like content (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Punctuality]]

message: Just to say i have created an article on the Great Northern Route as i keep hearing the line refered to it as this between 
Kings Cross and Moorgate    
then either 
** Welwyn Garden City
or Hertford North                          
Destinations:
Stevenage then:
*Cambridge
or Peterborough
I need some advice as to whether to keep thi article and if so can people make vast improvements to it as though it were a proper article describing the route.
Simply south 22:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Great Northern Route]]

message: IMO the usage figures at each station between PB and Cuffley to Peterborough and Cambridge are going to DECREASE dramatically with these restrictions. They also apply between Radlett and Bedford. Simply south 18:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ticketing

message: OK I have a slight problem here.
I have a very reliable source who told me, in writing, the following (exactly as writen);
"FCC has a large fleet of electric multiple units, comprising 41 Class 313s, 12 Class 317s, 86 Class 319s and 40 Class 365s.  These will be 
supplemented by a further eight Class 319s from Southern in December.  A further five '321s' will arrive next May while in 2010 London Overground's Class 313s will move to FCC, allowing busy inner-suburban services to be strengthened."
That whole bit above totally confused me and I really want to edit this article correctly -- could someone ideally experienced please help me with this.  
Thanks.
TXC (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 319 fleet 

message: (copyed from my talk page)
As witnessed above your understanding of what to do when you believe you haven't found a reliable source is slightly out of line with Wiki policy. If you do find a section in an article that you come to question, its best to place a note or a cite tag in it, rather than removing the info completely. As such I will be reverting the edits you have made on the First Capital Connect page. Sgreen93 (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, no, text in an article needs to be referenced to a reliable source and if not can be removed.  Facebook is not such a source, anyone can create a page. However, as requested I have tagged in the hope of "reliable, third-party (independent), published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". Edgepedia (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that WP:ELNO item 10 also WP:SPS both forbid the use of Facebook as a source, unless writing about Facebook itself... --Redrose64 (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And the paragraph was indeed about the page on Facebook, thus, IMO, making it apply. Sgreen93 (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No; in order to describe something as having been criticised on facebook, you need to provide an independent source which says that. Considering only the sentence "First Capital Connect received much criticism posted onto its Facebook Page."; to use Facebook itself as a ref source here is WP:PRIMARY. However, if there were an item in The Railway Magazine, Modern Railways, etc. noting such criticism, those are secondary sources, so you could use one of those as a ref source for the sentence. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  facebook 

message: I notice a notice has been placed at the top of the page calling the Criticism section into question.. Now, since nothing has actually been posted on the talk page I thought I'd start with the obvious question: Does anyone have any proposals as to what we should do with it? Sgreen93 (talk) 21:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Could someone please identify the (very short) train in this picture? Thanks! cmɢʟee୯ ͡° ̮د ͡° ੭ 00:06, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a First Capital Connect train at all; the maroon and grey livery is that of CrossCountry. It is in fact a , some of which have two cars and the others three, although the unit number is too blurred to make out specifically which one. At the start of 2013, the following Class 170 units had two cars and the CrossCountry livery: 170111-7, 170518-23. But this isn't really the right page for that sort of question - WT:UKRAIL would be a better venue, where questions like this occur there fairly often. --Redrose64 (talk) 07:27, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot! I just wanted to make sure the caption was correct — guess not... cmɢʟee୯ ͡° ̮د ͡° ੭ 17:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identify train 

message: This article is lacking in references within a lot of sections - am going to try and clean it up over the next few days. In addition, there are a fair few spelling/grammar corrections to be made. If anyone has a free moment and can help clean up the page, that would be brilliant - thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 12:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the article is referenced, so a blanket  is inappropriate. If you believe that there are a lot of sections which lack refs, please put a  into those particular sections, or a  onto specific sentences. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:41, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple of bits that need sorting. 

message: Is it just me, or is the criticism  section a bit small, considering that there are a lot of unsatisfied customers? Could it be expanded, as I am sure there are a lot of notable points of reference about?31.54.205.221 (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the criticism  section really accurate? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on First Capital Connect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.gnn.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=181549&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=False
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk/Main.php?iCmsPageId=236
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on First Capital Connect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk/content/doc/cms/Changes%20to%20timetable%20following%20consultation.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100123145010/http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk:80/Main.php?iCmsPageId=504 to http://www.firstcapitalconnect.co.uk/Main.php?iCmsPageId=504
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on First Capital Connect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402080415/http://www.thameslinkprogramme.co.uk/cms/pages/view/31 to http://www.thameslinkprogramme.co.uk/cms/pages/view/31
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130527143852/http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/rail-passenger-franchise-thameslink/thameslink-ojeu-notice.pdf to http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/rail-passenger-franchise-thameslink/thameslink-ojeu-notice.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified