lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomas Jefferson High School (Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania)

message: The part about the History Club not using the auxillary gym for the food drives is pertinent information vis a vis the over-arching efforts of the Pittsburgh WikiProject.  This information intends to be included once proper documentation that this gym has never been used for said purpose can be produced unequivocally.
There was a lot of unclear information, so i clarified as well as adding some well needed quotation marks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Staciitugwell (talk • contribs).
This has been clearly vandalized and therefore I suggest that the page be majorly re-edited. Bruddah iz 00:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There have been numerous concerns raised on here regarding the validity of information.  I, thusly, propose that all information be properly cited.  
It should be noted that much of the information assumed to be factual (since it has been on this page for some time) is actually false (e.g. the school newspaper is actually called "The Patriot" and the football team won the championship in 2003 not 2004).  I believe this original information was planted by the group of vandals and been intentionally miscommunicated by them ever since.
I have changed information to reflect true facts (having been a student here in the mid 1990's) and demand citations be provided for all new information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.122.114.199 (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns over citations

message: The vandalism has been incredibly annoying. I'm hoping to make this page a bit better. Glad to see some work was done on it, though I don't think the vandalism could be totally blocked. You know the way some people are. Rather annoying - I'm a freshman at this school and hate how people are making it look bad. Maybe it just bothers me as a longtime (anonymous) editor here. At one point there was ridiculous amount of vandalism coming from the school's computers. I might be a bit crazy, but the immaturity of these people does make me quite mad. Anyway, I'll be trying to improve this article further, but there doesn't seem to be much to cite. I'll try. 67.165.73.54 23:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm 

message: I attended TJ from 1986 through 1990.  The school newspaper was called the Statesman while I was there.  The article says it was named the Patriot "up through the early 1990's."  Alas, that is inaccurate.  That will need edited please.
Medleystudios72 (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Statesman vs. Patriot

message: i am going to remove information that is false. I know, i dont have sources to prove whats false. But the information in cant be proven true, so i will go with it. Atm in the garage (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  false info
Talk:Alan Charles Kors

message: Cleaned up the page---the guy is not *that* important and there are a lot of loaded irrelevancies here; corrected a typo; and added the T.B. Davie Lecture, which is on the web.verify 04:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1975: Lindback Award for Distinguished Teaching 
 
1975-76: Fellowship, American Council of Learned Societies 
 
1985-86: Director, N.E.H. Summer Seminars 
 
1986-87: Fellow, Davis Center for Historical Studies, Princeton University 
 
1989: Ira Abrams Award for Distinguished Teaching 
1990: Univ. of Pennsylvania Research Foundation Fellowship 
 
1992-98: Member, National Council on the Humanities (Confirmed by U.S. Senate, July 1992) 
 
1993: Seminar Director, Folger Institute, Washington, DC
1994: Young America’s Foundation Engalitcheff Award, for Defense of Academic Freedom 
 
1997: Templeton Honor Roll (for Academic Freedom) 
1998: Collegiate Network Friend of Liberty Award
1999-: Fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute 
 
2001: The Barry R. Gross Award for "Distinguished Service to the Cause of Academic Freedom"
 
2002: Caldwell Award for Leadership in Higher Education, Pope Center for Higher Education Policy
 
2003-04: Phi Beta Kappa Visiting Scholar
 
2004-05: James Wilbur Award, conferred by The Conference on Value Inquiry, for "Extraordinary Contributions to the Appreciation and Advancement of Human Values," 32nd Conference of Value Inquiry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 2005-11 Senior Fellow, The Goldwater Institute, Phoenix, AZ
 
2005: National Humanities Medal (Citation:"For his study 
 of European intellectual thought and his dedication to the study of the humanities. A widely respected teacher, he is the champion of academic freedom.") Washington DC.
 
2006: Charles Ludwig Award for Distinguished College Teaching
 
2007: Richard S. Dunn Award for Distinguished College Teaching
 
2008: Jeane Kirkpatrick Award for Defense of Academic Freedom
2008: The Bradley Prize (Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation)
2014: James Q. Wilson Award for Distinguished Scholarship , On  ttheNature of a Free Society, James Madison Center, EnlightenmentNow1789 (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A more balanced list of his awards, honors, fellowships, etc.
Talk:Rake (angle)

message: Would be nice if someone could knock up some diagrams visually explaining the difference between rake and trail on a bike. Picture paints a thousand... type of thing.
:Fbagatelleblack already did it on Trail (bicycles) -AndrewDressel 01:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Would be nice

message: I've tried to cross link these articles,
*Trail (bicycles)
*Mechanical trail
*Rake and trail
*Rake (angle)
but perhaps they don't need separate articles at all. They could instead be consolidated into a single comprehensive article. These topics are also covered in the Bicycle and motorcycle dynamics article because many of them did not exist as separate articles when that was written. Whatever happens, Bicycle fork and Motorcycle fork should be updated to reflect the results. -AndrewDressel 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate articles 

message: Hi all
I have removed the redir and recreated the Rake explanations. It is apparent that rake is an angle and that the others are subjects of that angle.
I have included the necessary examples as well as pointing to the db page. Chaosdruid (talk) 02:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redir to article
Talk:Trail (bicycles)

message: Would be nice if someone could knock up some diagrams visually explaining the difference between rake and trail on a bike. Picture paints a thousand... type of thing.
* Done. Fbagatelleblack 21:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I would like to replace the rake angle reference with a description of the effects head angle, fork offset and wheel size have on trail.  We could leave a reference to rake angle in the article, but "head angle" and the other terms are more common in bicycle parlance.  Are there any objections? Fbagatelleblack 21:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rake Angle vs. Head Angle 

message: I've tried to cross link these articles,
*Trail (bicycles)
*Mechanical trail
*Rake and trail
*Rake (angle)
but perhaps they don't need separate articles at all. They could instead be consolidated into a single comprehensive article. These topics are also covered in the Bicycle and motorcycle dynamics article because many of them did not exist as separate articles when that was written. Whatever happens, Bicycle fork and Motorcycle fork should be updated to reflect the results. -AndrewDressel 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate articles
Talk:Arkady Severny

message: What are sources, that Arcady Severny was Jewish? --Worobiew (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jew? 

message: I changed "left for St. Petersburg" to "left for Leningrad" That is correct, at the time the city was Leningrad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.167.192.228 (talk) 10:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Petersburg
Talk:Diana Baumrind

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 09:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Diana Baumrind died on September 13th 2018 in a car accident, as it is reported by verified accounts on Facebook. No suitable obit as yet. --Folengo (talk) 18:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ceyockey

message: User:Ceyockey
Category talk:	60
Category:	288
Help talk:	1
Image talk:	6
Image:	110
Mainspace	16043
Portal:	3
Talk:	996
Template talk:	187
Template:	136
User talk:	844
User:	236
Wikipedia talk:	934
Wikipedia:	2903
avg edits per article	1.57
earliest	04:17, 9 January 2005
number of unique articles	14446
total	22747
Data from Kate's tool. TSO1D 04:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mohammad Yamin

message: Is patently ridiculous - it needs to be removed.  There are streets named after him all over Indonesia, and if he is Pahlawan Nasional - that is sufficient apart from his poisition in Indonesian public life.  SatuSuro 04:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag

message: Equally so - a few repetitions and redundancies do not deserve such a tag. SatuSuro 09:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The article has extremely long sections, making it very difficult to read through (see how other articles will incorporate images, or, lacking that, breaking up sections into text: George W. Bush). Should we put the  template on it? Patstuarttalk|edits 09:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good - at least we know our differences on this one.  I agree but I dont - In each paragraph there are references to Indonesian history and context the writer has included that are covered in other articles - I suspect the writer is unaware of the other articles.  It is a matter of leading the writer to the issue of repeating information that is covered elsewhere.  I have asked for the writer to communicate - and I would like to give him/her the opportunity to engage about it before actually doing any serious editing. If there is no response in the medium term - then I think someone with a good knowledge of the range of articles available in the domain of Indonesian history should slowly but surely do some edits.  Your example leaves me shudderring ! SatuSuro 09:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: WP MOS does not consider external links inside an article as any good - and then there are internal lnks to WP IN as references - no go - either WP EN or nothing.SatuSuro 12:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Internal mess

message: This article constantly cites Yamin's use of "Malay."  It's nearly identical to bahasa Indonesia, of course, but why say "Malay" when Yamin was an Indonesian nationalist?  Granted, he felt that there was a common *racial* identity with Malays, but ... why the use of the "Malay" language?  After all, Yamin was a signatory of the Sumpah Pemuda, which basically invented bahasa INdonesia.  So it's strange to see the word "Malay" all over the piece.  --Smilo Don 15:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume thats what the sources said. Beyond this the Malay being referred is I believe Riau Malay, which is a Sumatran language. Even though Sumpah Pemuda was signed in 1928, formal efforts to define the Indonesian language didn't start until 1942. I don't know at which point his writings could be considered to make use of the "Indonesian language" instead of Riau Malay. User:Meursault2004, our language expert, may be able to provide a more authoritative viewpoint. (Caniago 16:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "Malay" language
Talk:Crito

message: In the "civil disobedience" and "conclusions" sections there are several interpretive statements that lack citations, e.g., "Socrates makes two more logical errors. He defends his moral pacifism with a bad analogy and props it up with a false dilemma." If these statements are widely held views in scholarship on the Crito, it should not be difficult to give references, following the example of WP:CITE and WP:FOOTNOTE. On the other hand, if no citation can be supplied for these interpretations, the sections need to be rewritten in accordance with WP:OR.
Please note that I've placed  templates in several other articles on Platonic dialogues, including Charmides (dialogue), Protagoras (dialogue)‎,  and Theaetatus (dialogue). --Akhilleus (talk) 04:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research in the "Civil disobedience" and "Conclusion" sections

message: I changed the English pronunciation from "usually KREE-toh" to "usually KRY-toh, also KREE-toh."  I checked with two leading experts in ancient philosophy, and they both indicate that "KRY-toh" is the usual English pronunciation (which comports with my own experience).  Mark DeBellis
Debell (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Pronunciation 

message: The "Summary" section is copied in its entirety from Sparknotes with the exception of two transitional words added to the summary on Wikipedia. Proof provided here, and the Sparknotes page is here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.90.91.2 (talk) 21:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A long time has passed since the above comment and the recent tagging!  I removed the summary section.  The first two paragraphs are exactly the same as the text here:  https://www.indiebound.org/book/9781091025264 BUT since it's a indie publishing website, I do not know if a WP editor copied it from there or if the webpage copied it from Wikipedia (which is also a possibility).  I will fiddle around with webarchive and see if I can tell.--MattMauler (talk) 23:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  the entire article is plagiarized from various different sources now that I looked at it. We might need to nuke it and build it from scratch. puggo (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: Since the article was nearly completely plagiarized from SparkNotes or other such sources, all but the lead was deleted. Now we need to rewrite it, and luckily, as it is a well known piece, there are plenty of sources. A quick search of "Crito" on Google Scholar yields a good amount of papers to write a summary, explain the significance, and write about what it means today. 
Additionally, the German translation of this article is featured, so anyone with the ability to read German would be vital to making this article better than it ever was.
I will be more than happy to work on this article once my workload thins, which it should after tomorrow. puggo (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebuilding
Talk:Laurel Summit State Park

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Laurel Summit State Park:
40.117562, -79.177118
I have been here many times.  Google Maps also has it wrong.  I used Google Maps satellite view to verify location and obtain coordinates.
—{Segulah1}
:. I've adjusted the coordinates to roughly indicate the park's center (per the map linked in the "External links" section of the article) rather than the entrance, though. Deor (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Protagoras (dialogue)

message: Aside from its truly hideous title, the "Subtextual Interpretation" section is problematic because it makes interpretive statements without giving any citations to secondary scholarship. I feel quite sure that the interpretation given is the idiosyncratic view of the editor who wrote it, rather than a widely held view in scholarship, but if I am wrong, it should certainly not be difficult to give references, following the example of WP:CITE and WP:FOOTNOTE. I have posted an  template on Charmides (dialogue) and Theaetetus (dialogue), which also have sections bizarrely entitled "subtextual interpretation". --Akhilleus (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As I also said on the project page and edit to Theaetetus, there is no place in these articles for this type of section at all. It's an excuse to run wild with original interpretation.  What would be nice, though obviously more time consuming to create, would be a section outlining some notable interpretations and debates among scholars about aspects of the dialogue. This sort of thing is notably sparse in philosophy topics on wiki. Zeusnoos 16:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research in the "Subtextual Interpretation" section
Talk:List of Kirby magical items

message: The original article made it sound like the Star Rod was used to fight Dark Matter (which it was not--Dark Matter is only in three games. Kirby's Dreamland 2, Kirby's Dreamland 3, and Kirby 64; the final weapons of those games are the Rainbow Sword, Heart Rod, and Crystal Gun, not the Star Rod), and made it sound like it was used in many games (when in fact it only appears in Kirby's Adventure and the GBA remake). I fixed that; my wording probably isn't as good as it could be, but at least the Star Rod section doesn't lie anymore. 63.215.28.146 04:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Rod
Talk:Men in Black (Three Stooges short)

message: If Wikipedia is trying to move away from trivia in their articles, we should probably consider removing the notes about Ren & Stimpy, Weird Al, and the other Men in Black movie. These really do not have anything to do with the Stooges short, and are just trivia. I didn't want to make the change, though, without mentioning it here. Fleagle 04:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "trivia" sections are just bad form. Usually these random notes can be worked into a logical narrative in the body of the text of the article. On the other hand, I'm not crazy about mentioning every reference to every Stooge move found in every cartoon either... Rizzleboffin 21:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'll remove such references if no one minds. Fleagle 00:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Changes

message: The forced retroactive application of the anime-based 1990's(?) neologism Hammerspace seems inappropriate, applied to a live-action comedy film from 1934.  The writers had no such concept of an extra dimension, merely the surprise-based humor of apparent violation of expected physical behavior of objects, one of many absurd or surreal ideas explored in early physical-comedy films. The more appropriate term to be applied to horses-from-the-closet is simply Surrealism, an idea originating in the same time period as the film.  --Lexein 10:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was under the impression that hammerspace is a concept for the sake of the viewer, used to explain the impossibility between size and space, and was never an actual principle intentionally used by directors. In other words, no director says "Let's throw in some hammerspace here." Instead, they use the element of surprise, as you mentioned, and then the viewer explains it by saying that they are using hammerspace. Therefore, I think it is relevant regardless of when the film was made. Fleagle 00:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ugh. I'll bet you one million dollars that in 50 years, everyone will know what Surrealism is, but hammerspace will revert to being either the painted outline around the hook on the wall where the hammer is hung, or the shape of the dent that's left in an anime fans' head when a Stooges fan is done with them.  --Lexein 01:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lol. That's all fine and dandy, and I'm sure in 50 years you can change it. But for now it's relevant to the article and fits perfectly, so I see no reason to change it. Fleagle 03:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hammerspace
Talk:The Librarian: Return to King Solomon's Mines

message: Does anyone else think this article needs extension? Or is everyone just watching it right now? Because, there is no story ending, barely any trivia, and all that rubbish. TigerDude 04:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this article doesn't cover the second half or so of the movie. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 04:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gee whiz, guys, I had to go to bed. I'll finish up the plot now. <g> Her Pegship 05:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We're not saying you did a poor job-- we're just agreeing that the job isn't complete. In fact, it's one of the better movie/plot summaries I've read (up to the point that you've completed it). :) —Disavian (talk/contribs) 05:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extension

message: I don't think that "mythic artifacts" is the correct term.  Firstly it should be "mythical" not mythic. Secondly the Shroud of Turin is not a mythical object, but a real one!203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:American Empire (disambiguation)

message: Can't find any references to use of the term United Empire of America other than as an obscure POV term indicating opposition to the current U.S. administration. Fails WP:NPOV. Will remove. Ronnotel 04:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Empire of America 

message: User MichiganCharms should offer up for discussion before moving an article. It is confusing why the move would be made without a 
proposal. Please justify. Please justify why the move is distinct from previous attempts to move and merge that were voted down http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:American_Overseas_Empire#Merger_Proposal. Thanks, Mrdthree 03:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The move which I freely admit was a poor one, was seperate from my merge attempt because it reflected only the nature of the articles... -MichiganCharms 07:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: User Michigan Charms moves

message: I cleaned up the disambiguation page per the definition of a disambiguation pages Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Disambiguation in Wikipedia is the process of resolving conflicts in Wikipedia article titles that occur when a single term can be associated with more than one topic, making that term likely to be the natural title for more than one article. In other words, disambiguations are paths leading to different articles which could, in principle, have the same title.  So for example, one would not rename "Manifest Destiny" to "American Empire".  --Work permit (talk) 03:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleaned up articles that don't belong on a disambig page