lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peel Island (Queensland)

message: PHOTO : does anybody have a photo of Horseshoe Bay on Peel Island that could be uploaded? - their are some good-ones on Flickr - but I suspect you can't just upload someones photos from Flickr to Wiki .... ?211.31.33.251 (talk) 06:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: This article was enhanced by students at The University of Queensland in October 2013.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KteachK (talk • contribs) 07:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student project  

message: Is this island inhabited or not? - Shiftchange (talk) 23:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Populated? 

message: then would we need to mention it is also a national park in the lead? Shouldn't it also have the categories for the national park and even another infobox? - Shiftchange (talk) 22:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, . I have added the name in the lead, created a redirect to it, and added cats to the redirect. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. Just discovered that there was already one with the shorter version of the name - so added another cat to that one. I can't see the SMH reference to the name having "and Conservation Park" at the end of it, but it's not that now. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And another one... Found a source which does include the Conservation Park as the official name, so have included that. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  If we are redirecting links to national parks here
Talk:Wilson Island (Queensland)

message: These could be used as references when expanding the article:
*Capricornia Cays National Park at the EPA - 
*Voyages official site - 
*Guardian article with a section on it - 
*The Age article, quite useful - 
*The Observer, not much but maybe useful - 
Toytown Mafia (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible references
Talk:Hate (band)

message: There is no page for this album. Clicking the link redirects to an article on Erebus. IainP (talk) 16:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erebos 
Category talk:Epic films

message: The list of epic movies is pathetic, missing many greats from this category and have such movies as, Marie Antoinet!!, the last legion, spartacus (2004) movie, 300 (good movie but not a epic, alomost an anti epic), chronicles of narnia, I mean common all those movies are b grade movie with b grade budgets and actors, a epic is a big budget, huge amount of cast and actuall good (not neccassarily great but good)..... non of these fit this description at all or are evn close.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epic_films
I would editted it myself but I have no idea how to
The Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy is definetly not epic. The Last Samurai and the Lord of the Rings trilogy needs to be added as well.
At World's End is definitely an epic. Black Pearl and Dead Man's chest are debatable  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.225.72 (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not very useful in its present form, except for following the links to the explanatory pages.
Maybe it would be better to give each movie one line in a table, so that some basic information could be included, e g year and country (these 2 facts reveal if it's b/w, silent, bollywood, and more) and if it's biblical. You may then just as well include war and stardust epics oin this table, and just note "war" and "stardust". This would also help moderately educated persons like me to identify what is "real" epics (i e movies which 95% of the world argee are epics). Even better if reasons for calling a movie "epic" was clarified and then each movie got some kind of "epicility-rank" based on this (such factors I think might be length, budget, number of characters, time that it covers, and if it's about a historical event or figure, even more so if this is a war)
Look at IMDB, movie "Young Winston", in the comments, for a pretty good list of "real" epics. All of these aren't included here!
And what the hec is "Tears of God"? No wiki page exists and I can't find it on IMDB. If someone would care to delete it, I wouldn't miss it.
--84.217.241.192 (talk) 03:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for improvement
Talk:Kat (band)

message: Is there a particular reason that only one album by this group (Metal and Hell) has its own article? Considering particularly that this very article cites Oddech wymarłych światów as an "Opus of Polish heavy metal" I would think this one at least deserves its own article as well, alongside Bastard, which is their best rated album on metal-archiveshttp://www.metal-archives.com/reviews/Kat/Bastard/12989/ (though, not on spirit of metalhttp://www.spirit-of-metal.com/album-groupe-Kat-nom_album-Bastard-l-en.html, which seems like a less reliable source anyways, as per the typos in the track listing).DLMacLeod (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-existent albums 
Talk:Geryon

message: Uh, this section doesn't appear to be relevant to Geryon... Why is it here?--Mr Fink 04:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Asterisms

message: I think that could be a good idea add a reference to Coruña local myth refered to the Tower of Hercules. This myth says that Hercules buried Geryon head down the Tower of Hercules. In the same way, this legend appear on the coat of arms of A Coruña, as it showed the tower the Hercules and Gerion's skull
This all is documented on the wikipedia page about the Tower of Hercules Infapi00 (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. --Error (talk) 19:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local myths 

message: The article says : "Geryon was often described as a monster with human faces. Geryon had one head and three bodies with a total of two arms."
The one head, three bodies part is inconsistent. If he has "human faces", how comes he has one head?  
The illustration as most which can be found shows three heads, three bodies, six arms, two or six legs. According to Hesiode's Theogonia, he had three heads.
Can someone check this and edit it? As I'm not a native english speaker (nor writer), I feel I should not do it myself.
Thank you for the good job already done, Paul ghaust (talk) 09:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help ! Something is really wrong with the physical portrait of Geryon
Talk:Offence against the person

message: Battery is also sometimes called 'common battery' (see e.g. paragraph 10.9 of Card, Cross and Jones Criminal Law, 12th Edition, 1991, Butterworths, ) so I shall alter the article accordingly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by James500 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Battery

message: I think this article probably requires a country by country list. ABH and GBH, in particular are English concepts.James500 (talk) 20:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize tag 

message: I have not heard of 'assault inflicting grievous bodily harm' or 'assault inflicting actual bodily harm'. I imagine that they may be offences in some other common law jurisdiction; not necessarily the same one. I have changed the list so that it at least correctly states the laws of one jurisdiction - England. 
Other jurisdictions will have to be added later.James500 (talk) 11:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other offences 

message: Need to mention threats - e.g threat to kill (s.16 OAPA 1861) - of injury or force; need also to mention detention/abduction/kidnapping/false imprisonment. James500 (talk) 11:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to self 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Offence against the person →  – More broad and general term, also consistency with the other entries in the criminal law navbox. Awesome Aasim 22:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Law has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 03:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Comment applying WP:COMMONNAME ... "offense against the person" gets less than a million hits while "crime against the person" gets between one and two million hits. Wikipedia usually tries to avoid bracketed terms for disambiguation pages unless two titles truly and actually refer to the same thing according to WP:NATDIS. Is there anything else we should take into account before deciding? Jorahm (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 February 2024
Talk:Carbon tetrachloride (data page)

message: Doesn't the given entropy of vaporisation look a bit low, even though it's at/near the boiling point. Based on a simple ΔH/T argument, it appears to be off by a factor of about 2 or 3. Grunkhead (talk) 09:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entropy of vaporisation 
Talk:Oliver St. John Gogarty

message: Seems to be 1891 not 1887.
http://www.jjon.org/jioyce-s-people/aunt
Timmy Finnegan (talk) 19:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Father's death date

message: I thought the 'St' was short for 'Saint' rather than Street? 'St.' with a dot means Street!
Orexis bouleutike (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pronounced "Sinjin" anyway, so it doesn't really matter. Jonchapple (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This abbreviation cannot be distinguished like that: either one could be "saint" or "street" ("saint" can also be "S." with plural "SS.") "St. John" is still one surname containing two words pronounced like one word. The town of "Saint John" in New Brunswick prefers that form because of "St John's" in Newfoundland.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 06:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

text: The dot is not normally used in current punctuation. My 1981 Granada paperback reprint of the 1964 Jonathan Cape biography by Ulick O'Connor has 'Oliver St John Gogarty' (printed exactly like that) as the title on the cover and title page, and in every mention of the subject's full name in the text. And St John's Wood in London... that never has the dot. Nor does St John's College Oxford, about which Gogarty wrote that limerick (though he himself was at Worcester College, and only for two terms). Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  st. with a dot? 
Talk:2007 May 16 Israeli air strike in Gaza

message: I think there's no need for a single airstrike page, there have been THOUSANDS in the past. Let's merge it into 2007 Israel-Gaza conflict --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed!--Cerejota 01:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 28, 2005

message: Can someone replace the deleted image link here with a suitable image? The image currently linked got moved to Commons and then deleted. I suggest :Image:Composite satellite image of South Africa in November 2002.jpg. Carcharoth 13:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 16:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pendergardens

message: I saw your edit summary and your addition of one source. Please take note of WP:N which suggests multiple non-trival sources. I would suggest beefing up the article, perhaps with documented economic benefits and adding additional reliable sources to it. Let me know if I can help. JodyB talk 13:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and Reliable Sources
Talk:Packaged pump station

message: I am sure other wikipedians will agree that this article is not written in an encyclopedic style.Gregorydavid 11:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reads like an advertisement

message: This webpage was provided as the original External Link:<BR>
http://www.southernpumpservices.co.uk/Packaged_Pump_Station/GRP_Packaged_Pump_Station_1500mm_SPSE1500_Range.html<BR>
while it is undoubtedly a commercial site, and therefore inappropriate as an EL, nevertheless it does allow future editors to have a clearer picture of what this article is all about! (NB - I have no connection with this company)
EdJogg 16:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research material
Talk:Rautalanka

message: :Copyedited by Tyrangiel (talk), a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 21:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: Before you remove mentioning The Spectre, please be aware that it deserves the place on the list more than the most of bands on it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.93.10.61 (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed 80.221.43.158 (talk) 20:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Spectre
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 17, 2007

message: Can someone change "and has by far remained the dominant film gauge" to "and has remained by far the dominant film gauge"?  Thanks.  --Doradus 13:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing wrong with split infinitives...jhawkinson 03:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have been clear. I wasn't complaining about a split infinitive. (There's no infinitive in that sentence.) I was complaining about a misplaced modifier. "By far" modifies "dominant", not "has".  --Doradus 11:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Talk:Charles Marriott

message: "Marriott was an anti-aircraft gunner in the Home Guard in World War II." I wonder if he started in the Home Guard and then enlisted in the regular army later on, as anti-aircraft gunnery doesn't sound like the sort of role that would be entrusted to the Home Guard, and the role isn't mentioned in Wikipedia's Home Guard article as one that they carried out. JH (talk page) 20:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything seems to say the same thing - I imagine it comes from his Widen obit. Fwiw, a google for home guard anti-aircraft brings up plenty of hits to suggest that the did indeed man AA batteries after 1941 - in particular, a source from UWE confirms this. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War 2 service
Talk:Sonata Software

message: The notability of the company has not been established by this article. Wikipedia is not a business directory.WhaleyTim 13:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Company press releases aren't reliable sources, I'm afraid. I've removed a load of them today (see list below) and I'll now try to use the remaining references to support the article. - Pointillist (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Picardy Spaniel

message: I'm going to put this article up for GA. If anyone has any further information then please let me know. The breed isn't that well know in the English speaking world and detailed information on French websites seem to be limited - and I don't have access to any French language books on dogs. Miyagawa (talk) 14:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing GA 
Talk:String Metrics

message: The former link Similarity Metrics was simply a synonym for this article. It did not need to be linked or a new article created. Wikipedia has a redirect feature which is more appropriate. This means that a page will forward the user to a different article.
The second former link Edit Distance was just linked to when its synonym Levenshtein Distance was given. I don't think it needs to be linked twice. Again consider creating a redirect for Edit Distance to point to Levenshtein Distance
Thanks Mehmet Karatay 13:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explaining why I removed two links

message: just do it and clean this page up. --Tainter 22:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Battle Ax

message: It's a very bad article if the first two sentences each use some term unfamiliar to the vast majority of readers.
It's fine to use "shield volcano" and "andesite" if you explain them in the text. 
It is not fine if a visitor has to click on a link in order to know what either one of the introductory sentences is trying to say.2601:200:C000:1A0:84B1:CCC0:70FF:37D9 (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad introduction
Talk:Statistical model specification

message: I'm making a few small corrections to this article, but I have a larger question. Do we really need a separate article about "specifying" a regression model? I think this subject must already be adequately covered in another article (about regression analysis, or regression models, or econometrics, or something like that).
I intend to hunt around a little bit and see if this article can be merged into a truly encyclopedic existing article.  DavidCBryant 13:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this subject is encyclopedic.  Right now the article is a little on the sparse side, but I'm planning to add to it. The specification itself probably doesn't warrant an article all on its own, but there are several related concepts that can be lumped in here: functional form, specification bias/error, and specification tests all need a place in Wikipedia. I think they can be combined here, and it works better than having separate articles for each. There is far too much information between these subjects to merge into the econometrics or regression analysis articles. Heavy textbooks and hundreds of journal articles have been written on regression.  Information on it has to be broken out some how, and I think the this set up (specification including functional form, bias, and tests) makes sense.--Bkwillwm 04:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this encyclopedic?

message: This article should include a section about model misspecification==
Kjetil B Halvorsen 14:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Model misspecification
Talk:Carswell impact structure

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 

message: Should be renamed to Carswell impact structure as there is no crater, although the same could be said for many of the impact structures listed as "impact craters". Mikenorton (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:University Hospital Coventry

message: i'm going to add a new section about transport links, if anybody could help thanks 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 08:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a citation and moved the section down the page so history and services come first (like other hospital articles). Dormskirk (talk) 15:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 15:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  new section
Talk:Charlevoix impact structure

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 

message: The name of this article needs to be corrected to "Charlevoix impact structure". This not an :impact crater, which is the topographic expression of an impact. In case of the Charlevoix impact structure, the original topographic expression of the impact, its crater, has been destroyed by erosion leaving only the deformed bedrock , which is teh impact structure, behind. Paul H. (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name needs to be corrected to "Charlevoix impact structure"
Talk:QuikSCAT

message: The claim that QuickSCAT the only satellite capable of retrieving ocean winds is patently false. ERS-2 has a wind scatterometer and SAR radars on both ERS and Envisat can detect ocean winds.  --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.5.126 (talk • contribs) 
: Still, the MSNBC article is pretty specific...  "Certain hurricane forecasts could be up to 16 percent less accurate if a key weather satellite that is already beyond its expected lifetime fails, the National Hurricane Center's new director said Friday. ... Proenza told The Associated Press that both two- and three-day forecasts would be affected."  Both of the satellites mentioned above are European satellites, might there be some issue with the US agency getting timely updates from European satellites?  Or maybe the European satellites don't have the same resolution or coverage of the U.S. that QuickSCAT does?  --Interiot 17:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? I don't know much about the issue, but losing a useful instrument and having less data can't very well help forecasts. If this claim is false, it is certainly not patently false. Foobaz·o< 22:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims
Talk:Applix

message: If so, I think that should be added to the article.--NapoliRoma (talk) 19:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but they spun off the Applixware product line around the turn of the century. I do not have details. Ningauble (talk) 05:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I gave up too soon... a few minutes later I found some apparently current info on the fate of Applixware at http://www.vistasource.com/en/company.php Ningauble (talk) 05:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the same Applix that produced Applixware? 

message: This article might be more useful if it included fewer industry boffin-words rendering it less esoteric. I'm *IN* the IT industry and that I cannot rely on the Wiki to make things clear is, well, disappointing. Shouldn't articles be designed for common or garden variety readers, rather than industry insiders who understand the terminology. (Yes, this diatribe was, in part, sponsored by the equally-obtuse MOLAP article.) fwiw 58.165.32.222 (talk) 11:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I still have no idea what the heck this is. 

message: Particularly as this is repeated (and up-to-date on the TM1 page itself. Would it be better to just remove this? Nawab (talk) 10:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Information about product developments after the company became defunct probably do not belong here any more than recent developments in lighting technology belong in the Thomas Edison article. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Latest version" of TM1 is out of date and is likely to quickly get that way again
Talk:Haughton impact crater

message: The third paragraph of this article contains sections of verbatim material from:
http://www.marsfrontier.org/blog/node/24
If you are the editor who added the material, please clarify this. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 20:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy and Paste Possible Copyright  Problem 

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox?
Talk:Holleford crater

message: In the main article is the mention of the crator as being at the Family farm of a Frederick Babcook. However the Reference link about the oldest surviving WWI Veteran mentions a Frederick Babcock. Could the First name reference be a spelling error by the author of the article.
PS.Unfortunately, the Oldest Surviving WWI veteran, is no longer so, he passed away recently. 
ref:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/02/18/war-veteran018.html
Richard416282 (talk) 05:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: typo in Family Farm name 
Talk:Susie (TV program)

message: She doesn't seem to have her own page, despite her Logie dress notoriety and being a name that most Australians would know, even if they don't know what she's famous for. Should she?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.198.124.26 (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Does she have her own page?
Talk:Rauchkäse

message: Shouldn't it be Rauchkäse? NickelShoe (Talk) 14:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Sounds a lot like rookkaas. Are the two similar or identical?
Geoff  Who, me?  22:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar to Rookkaas?
Talk:Presqu'île crater

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 