Talk:A. K. Faezul Huq

message: The notability of the subject comes from the fact that he held several public positions in the Government of Bangladesh (including member of parliament and minister). That he was the only son of Sher-e-Bangla is a trivial information and does not carry any additional weight on notability. Judging the current coverage of WikiProject Bangladesh, this article has to be assessed as one giving details on a very specific area of the broader topic of political history of Bangladesh. Hence this article should be assessed as low-importance. Arman (Talk) 09:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: St. Gregory's High School itself is assessed as a low importance article as this is just a school. There are numerous scholarships at different institutions in name of numerous people, and very small fraction of them have article on wikipedia - that is not such a big deal. You are also totally mistaken when you say A. K. Faezul Huq was in fact a man deserving 'low importance'  etc. because the assessment of WP:BND is by no way an assessment of the importance of the subject - it is only indicative of the importance of the article for the project. The reason of assessing this article as low importance is not to disrespect Late Faezul Huq in anyway, it is simply to help the WikiProject Bangladesh members get a quick view that "relatively" more important articles (like A.K. Fazlul Huq, Maulana Bhasani, Khaleda Zia, Sheikh Hasina etc.) clearly need priority attention. I personally have assessed 1,000+ articles for WP:BND and I can confidently say that this assessement is in line with the way other articles have been assessed. Even Banglapedia does not have any entry on late Faezul Huq while it is much broader in coverage for Bangladesh related topics than wikipedia. If this article is assessed as mid important, hundreds of other articles need to be reassessed for consistency and that will eventually end up diluting the prioritization scheme of the project. Arman (Talk) 09:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bangladesh always had one of the largest cabinets in the world, running up to 50 ministers at a time, some changing at a week's notice. By now there should a be a complete list of 1,000+ ministers from Bangladesh. The 330 member parliament has gone through 5 elections, which should again make for a 1,000+ MPs. It is possible that all these people deserve to be assessed mid-importance for the Bangladesh Wikiproject. But, with almost all the upazilas and district articles in rudimentary shape, basic articles on the law, government, literature, geology, environment, education, health and more either in a rudimentary shape or non-existent - it is very difficult to see why 2,000 people suddenly should become mid-important. Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Personal honesty, even while sourced, cited and verified is not a measurement of article importance. Hitler and Genghis Khan are two of the most important articles for the entire project of Wikipedia. Aditya(talk • contribs) 13:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment rationale 

message: This page needs to be blocked and protected from any change of information without documentary evidence by users attempting to distort the facts and mislead public in general. -MINISTER- 15:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection of page