Talk:Porygon-Z

message: Would someone please translate the Pokedex entry? We could learn a little more about this Pokemon.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.174.66.138 (talk) 23:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Japanese... 

message: Psypokes has the sprite of this pokemon, as well as the rest of them, if anyone cares to edit it into the entry..—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.194.55.132 (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Why are all 3 porygon classified as the 'virtual pokemon'? they are a part of a group of pokemon with the same classification. they should AT LEAST reclassify porygonZ as the 'virtual bird pokemon' or the 'virtual hummingbird pokemon'! can someone at least give me THEIR opinion on this subject, or possibly explain the classification?!  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.184.247.148 (talk) 00:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true.  The Bulbasaur family are all called the Seed Pokémon.  Besides, we don't make the games, we just report what they put.  -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 00:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why exactly should i care that we report this CRAP, Nerdyoshi? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.184.240.158 (talk) 00:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the point was that we on Wikipedia don't make up the classifications, Game Freak does. So if you have a problem with it, tell THEM, not us. Wikipedia is not a message board. Also, refrain from personal attacks on other editors.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.128.111.221 (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the..?! 

message: Is it worth mentioning how the name of PorygonZ is phonetically "Porygon Zed" and not "Porygon Zee" (as the trademarked kanji for the Japanese name reveals)? - NP Chilla 15:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonetic Z? 

message: Okay, why is this at "PolygonZ" instead of the obviously more correct "PorygonZ"? Seriously, there is no L/R distinction in Japanese, so it can't be an "official Romanization" on its own - but with context, we can see the other two are "Porygon" and "Porygon2". So why Polygon? Is there really any realistic chance at all that it will be called "PolygonZ" in the English release? --HeroicJay 01:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree here. Meh, not like it matters though. As of now, 'any' name is unofficial, so there's no reason to bicker over which name is more likely, even if it is set in stone. Come time of the United States release, all of the pokemon articles will have their proper titles given, and we'll have PorygonZ (Or PorygonZetto/Zed/Zeta) atop the page. You Can't See Me! 07:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I must ask: in what way is "PolygonZ" less official research than "PorygonZ"? The names are identical in Japanese... --HeroicJay 04:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because PolygonZ is the Romanization used by Nintendo (it'd be great if you'd pay attention to those things) themselves whereas PorygonZ is fan interpretation and original research? For all we know, the English name could be "Porygon3" or "Shitface" in the English version. But, please, continue your pointless complaining. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 02:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Profanity and insults. Charming. That said, we could use the "original research" name that might be wrong, or the "official Romanization" which you did not link to and might not be real that is almost certainly wrong. That said, as I typed this, the page had been moved to "PorygonZ". --HeroicJay 20:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  L?! 

message: Is its official, American name PorygonZ? Ksy92003 21:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hasn't been reported anywhere as far as I know.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 21:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's name has more recently been reported as Porygon-Z.  If so, changes to Gallade, its prevolutions, and Mamoswine should be made.--Tempest115 18:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: ...that PorygonZ is just Porygon2, but its head and body are on upside down. The description of its appearence is completely inacurrate. I changed that section a while ago, but it's been changed back. Comrade Pajitnov 16:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, PorygonZ's color pattern is slightly different, from what I see, and PorygonZ is darker in color. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's kind of darker, but if you look, it's head and body are Porygon2's, but put on upside down. Since Z is supposed to be a glitched up result of trying to make something better than 2, this would make sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Comrade Pajitnov (talk • contribs) 19:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks different in the torso area - Porygon2 doesn't have a band across the middle. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that the body has that band, but that doesn't make the head and body not on upside down. Comrade Pajitnov 21:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't be the only who noticed...