Talk:Hans von Storch

message: Don't forget to weigh in on Climate alarmism, doc. I already put your Storch quote there. --Uncle Ed 21:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Surprise, surprise

message: The comments about "Science noting an error" is unsat.  Science published a comment on the paper.  And included a reply.  And it did not "note" errors.  The comment alleged them and made comments on interpretation.  This is the normal process of science.  And the citation to Real Climate (a blog, which Mann, who's been criticized by VS, runs) rather than to the Science comment itself is biased.  I'm going to fix this bias.  I won't bother with the edit war, though.  I just hate that aspect of Wikipedia too much.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.146.144 (talk) 23:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored it, with slight changes. Adding a link is useful. Perhaps you could find the Sci thing directly? William M. Connolley 08:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: I've hunted down two papers referenced in the article with the following words:
:The inadequacy of the MBH98 methodology for climate reconstructions was later independently confirmed in other publications [...]
While the papers uncover certain weaknesses, I think that's a bit too strong. It's also something not about von Storch, but about MBH. Maybe we should rewrite this as:
:Other authors reported similar results to von Storch. [...]
Any comments? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequacy... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Hans von Storch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://coast.gkss.de/G/Mitarbeiter/storch/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100821080304/http://coast.gkss.de/G/Mitarbeiter/storch/CR-problem/cr.2003.htm to http://coast.gkss.de/G/Mitarbeiter/storch/CR-problem/cr.2003.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119213326/http://ugrad.stat.ubc.ca/~stat547/Leeetal.pdf to http://ugrad.stat.ubc.ca/~stat547/Leeetal.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717003836/http://web.dmi.dk/solar-terrestrial/staff/boc/reconstr.ps to http://web.dmi.dk/solar-terrestrial/staff/boc/reconstr.ps
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008112656/http://cccma.seos.uvic.ca/imsc/awards_storch.shtml to http://cccma.seos.uvic.ca/imsc/awards_storch.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707004445/http://www.giub.unibe.ch/klimet/docs/climdyn_2004_brazdiletal.pdf to http://www.giub.unibe.ch/klimet/docs/climdyn_2004_brazdiletal.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hans von Storch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721015943/http://www.enseignement.polytechnique.fr/profs/mecanique/Thomas.Dubos/MEC580/2008/Leleu_VonStorch93.pdf to http://www.enseignement.polytechnique.fr/profs/mecanique/Thomas.Dubos/MEC580/2008/Leleu_VonStorch93.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Parts of this article have been added by the notorious source faker, Polentarion/Polentario/Serten/Bakulan. It probably contains stuff which seems to be sourced to reliable sources but is really not, since the sources do not say what the article says. The German article has the same problem. I already removed in irrelevant paragraph where Storch is lauded by a denialist. --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work