lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stereo camera

message: Why did someone remove the links to museum which shows stereo cameras?
My guess?  Because they're in German.  Someday I'll add English links.  A2Kafir 18:13, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: How about some sample photos? I do not own any so I cannot put it up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.84.187.110 (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample photos 

message: I wouldn't want to curb anyone's enthusiasm for the Fuji W1, but it is definitely not the first digital stereo camera!
There is, for example,  the 3D VuCAM which is built into a pair of binoculars and has been out for several years. There is also the 3D Take 'n Vu and a few other devices which take both video and stills.  Of course, all these are rather large and bulky so you could honestly say  that it was the first compact digital stereo camera, or the first from a major manufacturer. Those statements would both be true. I'm giving you a chance to correct this before I do.
:Let's not jump in to a flame war pre-emptively! I thought it was first, but now I've removed that claim. There is, however, a resurgence in 3D technology going on at the moment (starting in 2009), and explaining that to Wikipedia readers is valuable. --- Rixs (talk) 13:17, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuji W1 NOT FIRST! 

message: I heard that as of 2010, 3D film cameras are typically two 2D cameras mounted close together, but that a camera designed from the ground up to be 3D would be better.  Has this since happened?  Any examples? -- Beland (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 2D vs 1 3D camera 
Talk:Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent de Paul

message: A replacement for the copyvio has been written: Daughters of Charity/Temp. Eugene van der Pijll 18:12, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the merge tag has been there for over 6 months and both users responding suggest no merge (just as I do) I will remove the tags. There is no point in the merger. History2007 (talk) 13:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:History of Orkney

message: ...however, much of the text is too Doric for an International Encyclopaedia. You know what you mean, I know it, but it's unclear in Plain English - you have to cater for furriners. For those who don't know what Doric is, it's a quasi-dialect reflecting Gaelic constructions carried uncorrected into English - for instance, Scots Gaelic has little sense of ownership, so "my boat" is "the boat that is with me" or something like it. The result is a far more widespread use of the passive tense, which dilutes the direct sense of hard history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.132.218 (talk) 00:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  My apologies for editing (a tidy up follows)
Talk:Thomas, 2nd Earl of Lancaster

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved Peter Karlsen (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thomas Plantagenet, 2nd Earl of Lancaster → Thomas, 2nd Earl of Lancaster — The use of Plantagenet as a surname for the English royal family prior to Richard, Duke of York, is anachronistic and not followed by modern historians. Agricolae (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I want to note post facto that I agree with Agricolae that these moves were in order.  john k (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The picture is captioned as Thomas of Lancaster with Saint George, but the picture's page says it is Edmund Crouchback with Saint George. --Tysto (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed for now on that basis. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:List of cyberpunk works

message: Why are they not included 2604:3D09:6979:AB00:203B:988C:8F37:6B34 (talk) 00:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is battle angel Alita 1993 and blame 1997 

message: There is mention of neither Pete Townshend’s Lifehouse project nor The Who’s album Who’s Next as prime examples of cyberpunk in pop music. The very sounds and themes of that material are essential to the canon of dystopian fiction. Chaimster (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who’s Next & Townshend’s Lifehouse
Talk:SoulDecision

message: 2010.05.30:  Band's 2 albums and 3 tracks (with a fourth coded for but no page) have there own wiki articles  They need to be collapsed into a section of this one main article. I recommend the deletion of the standalone song & album pages if not soon fixed by a fan, agent, or someone who simply has the time & inclination. Tickerhead (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  = =
Talk:Songo River Queen II

message: --Newsreporter 18:39, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hazara University

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --— The Earwig @ 16:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Japanese military ranks

message: I tried to give add some information especially the japanese names and their transliteration, as suggested in Talk:Comparative military ranks of World War II. However, especially with the navy enlists, I am not 100% sure whether I got the spelling right in every case. So it would help if someone else checked it. I used the table from here: http://with.k.kyoto-u.ac.jp/jun/others/jp-old.html --Flosch 18:50, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Prior art

message: I got redirected to this page while searching for "Novelty search", which is (also) a term from neuro evolution research in computer science.
I don't think it has any connection to patent law, so I think it would be good to have a disambiguation page for that lemma first.
Thanks! --H3xc0d3r (talk) 18:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Talk:IB Group 6 subjects

message: This article should look like the other IB Group articles, such as IB Group 5 subjects. -Satori 19:17, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This article contains no references at all. At least a link to the IBO would be nice , and statements like
 IB Music is one of the less common IB subjects. Compared to other IB subjects, few schools 
 offer it, and oftentimes, few students are willing to take it.
should be supplied with proof. Allispaul 13:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the process of trying to standardize the IB Subject Group pages, at least as much as possible.  That should--I hope!--make navigation of each article fairly simple.  I'm also trying to get citations and references on each of these pages and have included new sections for Footnotes and References.  I would recommend that, insofar as it is possible, we try to use the same citation/reference format throughout these articles.  I offer up the format I used at IB_Group_5_subjects, since I thought it was fairly simple to use.  This way we could also copy and paste some of the references, like the Handbook for Procedures, for example. Regards, CinchBug | Talk 18:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs references 
Talk:ExamDiff

message: ← For the record, I'm confused by User:Tony Sidaway's decision to keep this article, given that the votes were "delete" (me), "delete" (Soltak), "delete" (Linnwood), "leaning toward delete but abstain" (JesseW), and "keep" (Alex Nisnevich, the vendor of the ExamDiff application). How soon can this commercial advertisement be re-nominated for deletion? --Quuxplusone 01:33, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was borderline.  Three deletes and a keep, but the author did a good rewrite during the vote.  On borderline votes (70-79%) I consider the merits.  The argument that it's an advertisement didn't convince me; it's no more an advertisement than Microsoft Word, Visual Studio, GIMP or Photoshop.  The fact that the author gave a good account of himself did influence me.  Since there were so few votes here, please submit it for deletion again immediately with my blessing if you think I got it wrong.  More votes either way would have helped. --Tony SidawayTalk 02:03, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

text: First of all, I did a complete rewrite of the article following the VfD notice. Secondly, remember that Wikipedia Is Not a Democracy -  majority opinion does not necessarily rule in Wikipedia. -- Alex Nisnevich (talk) 02:35, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Operation Blessing International

message: Anyone here about Pat using operation Blessing planes for his diamond mining buisiness
: Here's a reference for that in case anyone wants to do research. --Craig Stuntz 13:54, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The following section, besides being loaded with POV phrasing, is entirely unsourced.  I have brought it here, where anyone who wishes may source it, rephrase it, and reinsert it once it's been made encyclopedic.  I've taken the liberty of wikifying what's here.  I don't understand what claim is even being made about FEMA's website - what on Earth does that have to do with Hugo Chávez?  And what does "those who know Robertson's record" mean?  Yikes.  And when was "on Sunday"?
:Other Questionable Practices 
:Robertson uses that Christian network for some markedly unchristian purposes.
:A few years back, he repeatedly defended Charles Taylor, the former brutal dictator of Liberia who is under indictment by a UN tribunal for war crimes.
:As with Mobutu in the Congo, Robertson had a personal stake in the matter: He had millions invested in a Liberian gold mine, thanks to Taylor, according to press reports.
:On August 22, 2005, Robertson called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. Those who know Robertson's record raised such an uproar that on Sunday FEMA suddenly rearranged its entire Web site for hurricane donations.
:Gone was Operation Blessing's name and choice location. Replacing it was an alphabetical list of nearly 50 national relief organizations.
-GTBacchus(talk) 05:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced, uninteligible material 

message: I've deleted the programs section as it is a direct cut and paste from the official website. Pennywisepeter 15:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: C&P
Talk:Double-density compact disc

message: I got two questions: Does this format use regular recordable CDs?  Is this format in any related to the Sega Dreamcast GD-ROM?--Kevin586 19:49, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
: No. Double Density needs DD-CD-discs. No. GD-ROM is different from DD-CD. See . Henri Tapani Heinonen 16:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variations of DD Compact Disc 

message: I don't understand the claim that this article lacks source. As per the article, the technology is present in two different engineering standard specifications. The claims can be verified by reading the said specifications.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daviburg (talk • contribs) 19:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of source claim
Talk:Rock Steady Crew

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- — CactusWriter | needles 15:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This page has been vandalized so I reverted to the latest, non-vandalised version. 88.159.236.245 (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Mook

message: I think that "Mook" an infamous graffito of Pittsburgh should be given recognizition in this page. FireSpike 20:02, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But like in that great song by les aigles, as-tu raison? That is to say, can you tell me why?
--Fighter 04:56, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recognition

message: I've heard from several separate places (all semi-reliable sources) that "mook" is a racial slur in Japan.  Can anyone prove/debunk this? -WarthogDemon 00:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursing? 

message: I've reformatted this page as a dab page. It may be worthwhile to create a stub or transwiki to Wiktionary the following content, provided it can be appropriately sourced:
*"Mook" is the Japanese publishing industry's generic name for quarterly or irregularly published large-format softcover publications having more pages than a typical magazine, yet less pages than a proper book. Examples from the automotive field include News Publishing Company's  HyperRev series  and Mazda Miata Roadster-specific Road&Ster .
**Mook was an Engrish contraction of the English words for a movie and book and were reference books for popular animation and film in Japan. The mooks themselves were often collections of color stills or screenshots taken directly from the movie or TV series, with additional material such as character and mechanical design sketches, fan art, and technical text from the creators included in black and white. The term mook was a fairly common description for these types of books during the 1980s, but, while the reference books are still being published, the term has now fallen into disuse as English becomes more prevalent in Asia, although the term has resurfaced a few times in recent years.
*** Mook is written as ムック in Japanese. See http://www.jekai.org/entries/aa/00/nn/aa00nn79.htm for further details (that generally confirm what's written above).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.51.27 (talk) 12:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformatted as dab

message: I've always understood mook as a word referring to somebody who is a working-class moron, not necessarily as someone trying to be cool.  I hear it all the time in Minnesota.  And I could have sworn I heard it in the first Fantastic Four movie.
:That's the English dictionary definition, there's a wiktionary link on the page. Anarchangel23 (talk) 09:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mook
Talk:Thorium dioxide

message: Or article says it's not listed in the EU. The German article says it's labeled both as "toxic" and "radioactive".  They also have a "Hazard" section in their article.  Since their ref is to a German page, would anyone mind if I translated what they have and move the contrast medium part from the top to a hazard section? 71.236.24.129 (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I object! The German source is here and described a product with less than 1% thorium dioxide. It also happens to agree with the current page when it says that ThO2 is nicht klassifiziert – "Not listed" is how we translate that, it is not the same as non hazardous. The same source gives the LD50 as 400 mg/kg (oral, mouse): quite frankly, I seen more toxic substances! Given the appalling state of the Thorotrast article, I would say that what is needed is research rather than the translation of poor German articles. Physchim62 (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hazard
Talk:Titanium tetrachloride

message: I do not know whether the Hunter Process with sodium is still used, however, as a chemistry student in the seventies I had a summer job in a plant (ICI Bain Works, Wilton site on Teesside) which did use this process.  Because of the high reactivity of sodium, the reaction took place under an inert argon atmosphere; the reaction product was "titanium sponge" which was then ground down to small pellets for shipping to customers. There was a similar plant run by ICI near Runcorn.  I was told that sodium was used because it produced a higher purity product, and that this was needed by NASA, one of the main customers.
There are references to the use of this process by ICI in the following document []Sasha (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Production of Titanium Metal

message: There's an inaccurate statement that TiCl4 is no longer used as a smoke screen, because of the corrosive nature of the smoke. I dispute this statement for the following reasons:
1) TiCl4 replaces white phosphorous as a momentary (rapid) smoke generator in most armies because of the fire hazard and the risk of third party injury and death (collateral damage). So TiCl4 is the more humane option for momentary smoke screens.
2) It is in fact still used as a smoke generator, for example in the Swedish Rökgranat (rökgr) m/73 and m/81.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Student342 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever.... it is probably unimportant if this stuff is currently being used and by whom, so I converted the paragraph to something more generic. --Smokefoot (talk) 19:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT used as smoke screen any more?

message: As of today: 42658 references, of which 23426 have appeared since the year 2000, of which 127 are classified as reviews by Chemical Abstracts Service (mostly on materials and Ziegler-Natta it appears).--Smokefoot (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Literature report: 42658 references
Talk:Thành Thái

message: * The first sentence is ambiguous.  Which parts are about the subject, and which parts are about the subject's father?
* There are POV issues in the second paragraph.
* What's with the "Actually..." paragraph?  Sounds like someone just injected their opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.168.96.98 (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Forth 1

message: I think we should get rid of 1548 Forth 2 and this article and put all suitable information on the Radio Forth article. User: Radiotay 18.10.06
:I disagree. Forth One and Forth 2 are both major radio stations in the UK and they differ in many ways. I just don't feel it would be worth it. Edits  AntzUK  Talk  16:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Join with 1548 Forth 2 ?
Talk:Cummins

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is against a move. (closed by non-admin page mover)  feminist (talk) 05:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Companies has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Trucks has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Buses has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 December 2021 

message: The 12v is the best truck motor for its time and In my opinion it still is because at the time it was pushing 20 psi while ford and Chevy only had five and still went just as far as the 7.3 and more Mechanicalmafia466 (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  12v Cummins 

message: Does anyone here plan to add the Onan Corporation of Minneapolis to the history section? For example, David Onan invented his wrist meter in 1918. I think this must be an oversight. President Biden didn't make this mistake when he visited Cummins in Fridley. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: any content for the former Onan Corporation would be welcome in the section as long as it were well-cited. Group29 (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onan Corp
Talk:Xenon tetroxide

message: How do you dissolve a compound in water which detonates at any temperature above ~40 degrees below the freezing point of water?!?--Deglr6328 05:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dissolve the gas in an inert gas like helium to very low concentration and than bubble ut through water. This would be by suggestion.--Stone 09:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Someone should verify the truthfulness of my correction of the reaction equations to take into the account that there is no completely deprotonated xenate ion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula changes 

message: Can we get nitrido or immido complex of Xenon(VIII) just like that of Osmium?
eg. XeO3(NCMe3), Xe(NCMe3)4, [Xe(N)O3]- etc...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoop.m (talk • contribs) 13:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenon multiple bonds with Nitrogen?
Talk:Eli Lilly and Company

message: in  you added references to ":12" and "usdoj-200902", but these aren't defined in the article. Will you be able to provide these references for the article, or should the unsourced material be removed? -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They're the same refs used for that statement later in the article, but with "2" appended. I've fixed them. -- Fyrael (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing sources