lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Insight on the Scriptures

message: Like this one, there are several nearly orphaned articles, each pertaining to a specific JW publication, that should probably be combined into one useful larger article. For example, an article titled "Jehovah's Witness publications for reference" could include any now-independent articles about publications such as those listed here:
List_of_Jehovah's_Witnesses_literature#Reference_works
Reference works
    * Insight on the Scriptures, 2 volumes (1988)
    Aid to Bible Understanding (Complete edition) (1971)
    Aid to Bible Understanding (A - Exodus) (1969)
    * Reasoning from the Scriptures (1985, revised 1989)
    "Make Sure of All Things; Hold Fast to What is Fine" (1965)
    "Make Sure of All Things" (1953, revised 1957)
    * Comprehensive Concordance of the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (1973)
    * "All Scripture Is Inspired of God and Beneficial" (1963, revised 1983, 1990)
    "Equipped for Every Good Work" (1946)
Studies in the Scriptures, 7 volumes:
    The Divine Plan of the Ages (1886)
    The Time is at Hand (1889)
    Thy Kingdom Come (1891)
    The Day of Vengeance (1897)
    The At-one-ment Between God and Man (1899)
    The New Creation (1904)
    The Finished Mystery (1917) 
I'll put this on my "to do" list, but wouldn't mind someone else doing this work.--AuthorityTam (talk) 19:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jehovah's Witnesses publications for reference
Talk:Reasoning from the Scriptures

message: Do we really need a complete table of contents for this book? DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Additionally, these JW-only books do not warrant undue weight of their own article. I have restored the redirect to the summary article for this category of JW publications.--Jeffro77 (talk) 22:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of Contents
Talk:Frederick William Franz

message: The article mentions that Franz was raised as a Catholic. However, the reference (The Watchtower, May 1, 1987, page 22-30) mentions Franz was baptized in the Lutheran Church, but was sent to a Catholic school and attended the Catholic services for practical reasons (the St-Joseph Church was nearby).  Bertrand77 (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just adding a note that this has since been corrected. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 14:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Raised as a Catholic?
Talk:Milton George Henschel

message: Why has an unregistered person (from merely an IP address) been DROPPING or abbreviating information and abbreviating that information from actual calendar dates, to years only?
cf.President of Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society
1884–1916
MaynardClark (talk) 04:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The overzealous editor appears to be literally interpreting the years parameter used by the template. However, removing the dates in this case is unhelpful, and should be reverted.--Jeffro77 (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Years under 'President of Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society'
Talk:Homogeneous

message: According to the Oxford Guide to English Usage, 'homogenous' is a frequent error for homogeneous, not an alternate. Charles Matthews 13:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I was just about to ask the question. — MFH:Talk 16:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Homogenous
Talk:Anna of Russia

message: "foolish and ignorant maids" "struggle on the part of Russia to cover her 'natural and legitimate' southern boundaries " This is not NPOV...
:This is the phrasing of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, so you have to live with it... --Ghirlandajo 12:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Anne is the english version of her name. Why is her name germanized on this Wikipedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.250.113.213 (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Germanised?  Hardly.  Anna was her Russian name, and she's much more often known as Anna than as Anne in English-speaking countries. --  JackofOz (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna or Anne? 

message: Why did she became Regent in Courland? What was her status? Was she declared a monarch, a regent, or a governor?--85.226.42.215 (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reign as Duchess of Courland 1711-1730 

message: Per Wikipedia's page on John Julius Angerstein, his family tradition holds that his biological parents were Anna of Russia and the London businessman, Andrew Poulett Thompson. Does anyone think this should be mentioned on Anna's page? There doesn't seem to be any evidence to support such a relationship, just "family tradition."
June w (talk) 02:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanck you June for the info.  RCNesland (talk) 06:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her son - John Julius Angerstein? 

message: This Wikipedia page links back to the Factinate site "Unhinged Facts About Anna Of Russia, The Mad Tsarina" which is a very pulpy and uncredible trivia site. The Factinate page also links back to Wikipedia as a source, which confuses the point of origin for much of this information. Blightmorde (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Should remove content sourcing from a site like that, definitely Danial Bass (talk) 21:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recursive and Unreliable Sources
Talk:Martin Ručinský

message: I experimentaly added name of Martin Rucinsky read aloud to see if anybody will shout. If there are no objections I will add pronounciation to the whole Czech hockey olympic team. I liked this on Jagr's page. I also wait, becouse I upploaded file to the wikipedia commons and I am not sure if the file is language neutral enough to be there. --Jan Smolik 16:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CEITEC

message: — JIP | Talk 07:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Zoom (Indian TV channel)

message: Hi, I think this is a more representative title. Normally, I wait for comments for a week before merging articles, but in this cae one day shd be enough as the originator of the article in both the cases is the same person and must have duplicated it by mistake. --Gurubrahma 07:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Silvio Santos

message: I'm not sure it matters much, since there's a redirect anyway. But since I always see people debating this kind of thing in the talk pages... I think the title of the article should be changed from "Senor Abravanel" to "Silvio Santos" (not sure whether the proper spelling is with an accent, i.e., "Sílvio"). He is much, much more widely known as SS than as SA. --Cotoco 07:40, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct.  According to our naming conventions, the article is to be titled according to the common form of address.  Scarcely anyone in Brazil would know Silvio Santos' real name (and in fact, most wouldn't even make any connection).  So, unless anyone objects in the next 48 hours, I will move the page appropriately.  Regards, Redux 05:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been moved.  Regards, Redux 02:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article

message: I would appreciate it if the anonymous user who added the birth time 00:15 recently would let us know the source of this information. --Aloist (talk) 10:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth time source 

message: According to the latest figures from Forbes, Santos net worth is US $1.3 billion, so I think the figure given is reals, not dollars. If no one objects, I will correct it.
American In Brazil (talk) 09:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Net worth 
Talk:Wide area network

message: I noticed that the Internet is referred to as a WAN, but I was pretty sure that this is not the case. Maybe somebody should look into it. AtkinsSJ 13:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet a WAN? 

message: The revision of 04:10, 24 October 2011 is a mess: under the heading "Design options", formatting is wrong, and much of the text is inappropriate to the article. Not sure what to do about it (I'm not experienced enough as a Wikipedia editor). Urgos (talk) 21:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There was never a problem with this article. The Area networks template was vandalized. All better now. --Kvng (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virtually unreadable 

message: The following was contributed by . I have moved it here until formatting and grammar issues are resolved and the material can be integrated into the article. ~KvnG 17:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raw contribution
Talk:President of Singapore

message: This article needs to explain much more about what the criteria for being president is and why the other candidates were disqualified. What did the election committee say was the reason? We just seem to be saying that it's rigged - we must be able to do better than that. Secretlondon 21:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The other candidates were disqualified for not having satisfied the criteria set out in the  for standing as candidates in the Presidential elections. I don't know, though, whether the Presidential Elections Committee issued a report setting out the reasons why they were disqualified. Will have to do a bit of hunting around for the information when I have time. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 21:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The criteria are already stated in the article in the section "Qualifications". What is not known at the moment is which criteria the would-be Presidential nominees failed to satisfy. — Cheers, JackLee –talk–</span> 17:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidates

message: I found the following quote stashed at the bottom of the article, under the List of presidents of the Republic of Singapore section:
All the Presidents of Singapore to date have been men. Nonetheless, in a 2008 poll of 1,256 Singaporeans conducted by MyMailMoment.com, a lifestyle research portal run by SingTel, 63% of women respondents and 58% of male respondents said they would vote for a female president. Those aged 50 and older were the most receptive to the idea.
This is the diff for it.
# This piece of information is most definitely in the wrong section. Is there anywhere more suitable to place it?
# The survey was conducted almost nine years ago, has no published methodology, and a very small sample size. Is the data good enough to be used here?
--YewGotUp (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance and placement of informal 2008 poll
Talk:Command center

message: I added the 'limited geographic scope' tag because of the focus of the main paragraph in the 'Military' section. I'm guessing 'bird- or star-grade commissioned officers' and 'sitreps and progreps' are a US military concept? This section doesn't adequately describe command centers elsewhere. --David Edgar 08:05, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "bird-" and "star-grade" officers are US officers holding the rank of colonel or above (their insignia are eagles or stars), so yes that example is limited to US military application. "Sitreps and progreps" are military shorthand for situation reports and progress reports and are not limited to US military concepts. Nonetheless, the stub does need to be expanded for other relevant applications of command centres. --Scottie theNerd 16:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Limited geographic scope

message: The reference to Command & Conquer as well as Power Rangers makes zero sense. Almost every RTS game and very, very many movies have command centers. If we keep this section here we should also add a Popular Culture section into the article about cars referenceing Need for Speed and Fast & Furious. Dr. Strangelove makes at least a little bit of sense since this one can be considered prototypical. I would scratch this section entirely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.85.220.252 (talk) 11:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture
Talk:Capital market

message: Capital Markets plays heavily in the real estate arena too.  I'd love to read more about how and why. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.41.81.142 (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real estate too 

message: I think primary and secondary types are only in stock/equity/share market not in Bond market
cyborg
Somehow it is right Oikuchu (talk) 13:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 

message: Removed IFR external links, as these are not specific links to details of Capital Markets, but instead to a for-profit website which covers the markets.   Might was well link to WSJ and CNBC while you are at it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffcutter (talk • contribs) 05:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  IFR 

message: In Hindi 1.23.148.201 (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital market 

message: Voice 49.205.82.186 (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital market
Talk:Department for Education and Skills (United Kingdom)

message: In UK, is university education free like Sweden?
--Joseph on the 20th of October 2005 - depends where you live in the UK rgds, johnmark† 16:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does any one know how much responsibility for edication in Wales and Scotland is still the responsibility of this department. --Salix alba (talk) 22:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has it any remit at all for education in Scotland? Surely a devolved matter.... dave souza, talk 09:39, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remit - Wales and Scotland 

message: What happens in WP when the referenced material s removed from the www. In the case of this article, the DfES could be adequateley referenced simply by www.dfes.gov.uk . However since this Department was split into two earlier this year, then DfES no longer exists. The work has gone to DIUS and DCSF but the new Departments will not necesarily see the need to maintain a History of Predecessor Departments. It would be a loss to WP if this material had to be removed because of the removal of its original sources. What is the WP policy here ? 
--rgds, johnmark† 16:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding references 

message: The preceding agency, the Department for Education and Employment, links back to the header of this very article. Is there no article for the DfEE as it was? Many thanks in advance to anyone who knows the history enough to remedy the situation 146.200.142.204 (talk) 20:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-linking
Talk:Fender Lead Series

message: These sources do not belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them to see if they follow criteria per WP policy, so be careful in choosing any potential references I've moved here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources belong here, not in external links 
Talk:Calexico (band)

message: Someone please clarify. This passage: "At the end of 2000, Calexico joined with two French friends Naïm Amor and Thomas Belhorn to record Tete a Tete for release at the beginning of 2001. The band released two collections of rarities during 2001. Even My Sure Things Fall Through collected outtakes from previous albums, B-sides, remixes and material previously unreleased in the US. The album also featured Mariachi Luz de Luna who frequently played live with the duo. The Aerocalexico album was sold exclusively at their gigs in 2001."
What album is the 'this album' that featured Mariachi Luz de Luna? Even My Sure Things Fall Through? Aerocalexico? Tete a Tete? Something else?  I'm confused. JonathanNil 23:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: A number of new images of the band are now available at :Commons:Category:Calexico. Feel free to add some of them to the article. Cheers, Quibik (talk) 23:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images available 

message: The discography needs to be split into an article of its own, unless it has been merged before? Karst (talk) 11:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:London City Airport

message: Hi everyone
I heard the news that Alitalia is expected to end its services from/to LCY to/from Milan Linate on 31 Decemebr 2020 due to slots permission expiration. Does it sounds to anyone of you? actually I was not able to find any source for this (of course no one is likely to announce/promote a service closure)
Riktetta (talk) 10:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of Alitalia services on LCY 

message: The current map is correct to the most part, although it says that the Elizabeth line 'opens in 2019', whereas obviously it is opened now (Although it did open just a bit late, in May). Angusgtw (talk) 19:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New map? 

message: Anybody have a usable, current photo of the airport?  The current lead photo is out-of-date, for example, it doesn't include the full length taxiway now in place.  Guinness2702 (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated photo needed 

message: The airlines and destinations section lists a variety of mainline airlines which appear to operate services at LCY using only regional subsidiary airlines. Is there some reason the main carrier is preferred here over the regional brand?  As examples:
* Lufthansa → Lufthansa CityLine
* British → BA CityFlyer
--N8wilson 🔔 01:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional subsidiary carriers vs. mainline? 
Talk:Elsie Mitchell

message: I think this should be merged with the Fire balloon article. The woman herself isn't notable apart from the circumstances of her demise, which is already detailed in the fire balloon article as well as in Attacks on America during WWII. --BluePlatypus 08:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not saying the attack isn't notable. What I'm saying is that there is no reason to have a seperate article for this making three articles giving nearly all the information contained here. That information should be merged and this page changed to a redirect. --BluePlatypus 16:08, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages/Archive 7

message: The current article has the following line describing the use of piping:
:* If exceptionally a word of the description is wikified, you may use piping in the description.
What is this supposed to mean? I'd rewrite it to sound more like native-speaker English, but don't understand the point it's trying to make. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See if it looks better now. —Wahoofive (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes. Thank you very much. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing "Piping" explanation 

message: What is the feeling about links to categories in dab pages? Eg: at Transformers there is the link "Transformers category in Wikipedia". --Commander Keane 09:11, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
:If you ask me, I say stick it in the "see also" section.  Neonumbers 07:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I don't like to see non-mechanical (i.e. semantic) categories affixed to disambiguation pages; most dab pages could appear in a dozen very different categories easily.  However, if all the disambiguations on a page are in the same topic area, then I'd say add the category as it would be added to a "normal" article, not in the See also section. Courtland 00:15, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category link
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Log/2005 October 20

message: Is there a bug in the system? Have tried to add Eve_of_the_Apocalypse to the list several times now, using both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ Eve_of_the_Apocalypse and subst:afd3|pg=Eve_of_the_Apocalypse, without results. I wanted to add this article as it has been tagged for deletion by Mrdie, without being listed here. Bjelleklang  -  talk 09:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It already appeared on the list, but it was hard to notice because the subpage was not formatted correctly (no header, and thus the article title did not appear in the index). Fixed now. -- Ferkelparade π 09:49, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thanks! Bjelleklang  -  talk 10:17, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Progressive stamping

message: I these articles should be merged, they cover essentially the same subject matter. Iepeulas (talk) 03:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Wizard191 (talk) 02:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Progressive stamping]] 

message: Little parts like connector pins are usually made from wire either by progressive stamping or with a Four slide machine. An illustration of some part after each step in the stamping sequence would be useful. --John Nagle (talk) 04:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use more background
Talk:Peter Wright (MI5 officer)

message: Didn't Peter Wright admit a few years after publication that much of the book was untrue, and that he made up certain "facts" to pad out the work and try to support the "true" (according to him) claims he did make? 81.105.27.137 09:41, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd be interested in seeing a citation either way about what the CIA knew at the time. JoshuaZ 21:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Wright didn't have a science degree or a scientific approach. He was merely a wannabe witch-hunter, who "exposed" the truth about Kim Philby decades after Philby had done so himself.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spycatcher: fact or fiction? 

message: As France was an ally of Britain in the 1960 to 1963 years, I am not sure what was going on. Time seems to have been wasted on a purely technological exercise.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.91.77 (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone spies on everyone else (within budget restrictions).--Jack Upland (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  France 

message: .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.87.243.66 (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  . 

message: He did not have a science degree.--Jack Upland (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference for that is page 15 of Spycatcher. Of course there is a question what a scientist actually is. Wikipedia states, "A scientist is someone who conducts scientific research to advance knowledge in an area of interest." I don't think that is what Wright actually did. He was more of a technician.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientist? 

message: Next head of MI5 was of poor performance. Her opinon about Peter Wright can not be legitimste Jan Electronik (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: is grave error. He worked for many best and was treated in worst possible manner. Jan Electronik (talk) 03:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Wright. The article is biased and used next mi5 head opinion who was never in that business