Talk:The Living Daylights

message: *Thank you all for coming so fast when I asked for another opinion, and per the other GA requirements above I will now pass this article as a GA.  Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 19:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Passed 

message: "Q. How much fun is it to play a Bond villain? 
Sean Bean: I love it. It's more fun to play the bad guy. 006 was such an 
interesting character and the film really explored his friendship with Bond 
and how it all went wrong, so it was a very personal journey for both 
characters. And to quell the rumors, I never auditioned for the role of Bond."
http://www.compleatseanbean.com/mainfeatures-136.html
What's the source for the claim that any of the others did?  69.220.2.188 (talk) 01:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed Sean Bean from the casting section. El Greco(talk) 01:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sean Bean never auditioned for Bond 

message: A cleanup page has been created for WP:FILMS' spotlight articles. One element that is being checked in ensuring the quality of the articles is the non-free images. Currently, one or more non-free images being used in this article are under discussion to determine if they should be removed from the article for not complying with non-free and fair use requirements. Please comment at the corresponding section within the image cleanup listing. Before contributing the discussion, please first read WP:FILMNFI concerning non-free images. Ideally the discussions pertaining to the spotlight articles will be concluded by the end of June, so please comment soon to ensure there is clear consensus. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion pertaining to non-free image(s) used in article

message: Is the current revision of the plot section sufficiently concise to remove the (plot) header? Nizamarain 14:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the absence of comment I'm going to remove the plot header. Nizamarain 18:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I'm late, but I agree; it explains a complex plot with as little faff as possible. Compare with The Langoliers (not even the book; the TV miniseries!), which does a very good job of bulking out a simple plot with reams upon reams of drivel. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove (plot) header? 

message: So, is it smiert shpionam or smert spionam (from this article) or smert shpionam (from this little stub)? The impression I get from SMERSH is that they're all acceptable versions of the original Russian, but which is the standard? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death to Spies 

message: Other actors considered for the role of James Bond included; Mel Gibson, Mark Greenstreet, Lambert Wilson, Antony Hamilton, Christopher Lambert, Findlay Light, and Andrew Clarke.
I was under the impression Findlay Light was an Australian model who nearly had the role in Dr. No.  I've never been able to find anything about him other than a comment by one of the producers that he looked like a young Gregory Peck.Foofbun (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Findlay Light

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Living Daylights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061009210203/http://www.klast.net/bond/pb_road.html to http://www.klast.net/bond/pb_road.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518175603/http://www.007magazine.co.uk/articles_archive.htm to http://www.007magazine.co.uk/articles_archive.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The end of this article's prose shows this: "The critical consensus on Rotten Tomatoes calls it 'exciting and colorful but occasionally humorless'". Should this be changed to "The film received generally positive reviews, which praised the more serious tone, but received criticism for its lack of humour", or is it already good enough? Blue Jay (talk) 04:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prose? 

message: Why is "ally" used so much when "colleague" would be more appropriate in many cases?--Jack Upland (talk) 08:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ally? 

message: Hi,
I think this should be changed to generally positive, considering that it is generally ranked highly in the james bond rankings and in addition recieving better reviews than it had before, going as far as saying it is better than licence to kill, which also recieved praise and is slightly higher than the living daylights. 118.210.43.64 (talk) 01:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Metacritic rating indicates "mixed or average reviews". Do you have sources for your claims? DonIago (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: In the Czech language, all female names end with "-ova". Therefore, a name like "Milovy" cannot exist. Apparently British chauvinism and jingoism goes so far that no one cared to check the character list for such an obvious fact. --Reibeisen (talk) 22:11, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kara