Talk:Byron Coley

message: Yes, it's hard to believe.  But it's true. TortureIsWrong 16:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't appreciate that characterization of my edits, but thank you for finding a proper source.  The Behnam 20:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll need to re-remove the 'bit of an anomaly' statement.  I don't know why that is there, it seems POV, and it is not even projected from a source.  Sorry but I don't know anything about the ISBN stuff and cannot figure out how to use the current source, but I looked at the isbnbooks thing and saw that it was listed so I'm fine on that.  But seriously, what is with the anomaly thing? I'll take it out.  Cheers.  The Behnam 20:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well that would be classic weasel words there.  It is especially off since there aren't any sources about who is saying that.  Perhaps you should just not care about adding that particular POV commentary.  The Behnam 20:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I think that you would see very easily by just by reading WP:WEASEL, but I'll get a 'neutral' person.  But which users are neutral enough for you?  The Behnam 20:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've asked User:Bignole for now, as I know him to be fairly neutral and uninvolved in the conflicts at the RFC.  I don't understand why you can't see it for yourself, but if a third opinion is what it takes, I'll try getting one.  Cheers.  The Behnam 20:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I suppose the problem is that it is (y)our own comparison and isn't simple logical deduction.  Why not just remove it? I don't think the article gains much from the POV observation.  If it so obvious the reader will pick that up on his own.  I'm asking you to remove it because I think it demonstrates a conflict resolution much better than me doing it, but if you still question this removal, please ask away.  The Behnam 21:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: You mean to tell me that there isn't a single book critic that has reviewed the Chuck Norris biography? Also, if Coley isn't a "major" writer then his departure from music shouldn't be that much of a surprise. Do we know if he was just a really big Chuck Norris fan?   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 22:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: First, please stop using bullets. Secondly, I have a book called The Detective, written in 1966 and it has reviews from book critics, hell I have the sequel to it, Nothing Lasts Forever (which is the bases for the film Die Hard) and that book has reviews on the back of it for The Detective. BTW, that book was written in the '80s. So obviously you don't know what you are talking about and haven't taken the time to actually do any research for sources. Anything published is bound to be reviewed by someone. Now, it may not be reviewed by high-end critics, but some professional book critic is bound to have read it. Try doing a little research; try using Google News Archives. You can search back for decades. Now, here's the important part, because I know you are going to try and pull something with this "google search" that I suggested, the search finds will most likely be for hard copy sources. They will be information that has been uploaded to the web that originated in a newspaper or magazine. If there are absolutely no reviews of the book, oh well, that's life. But please loose the hostile attitude that you are directing at me, and that I have seen you direct at Behnam (e.g. "you're a swell guy). You're particular brand of sarcasm is not necessary. I have done nothing but provide an outside opinion and some reasonable solutions that would help YOU be able to include the information that YOU want. If you don't want to take the time to look for some resources, that's your prerogative, but I do not appreciate the attitude. I shall not get into a debate about your attitude, nor shall I post on this articles talk page again. I've provided you with some solutions, and brought to your attention what I believe to be a rather uncivil manner of conducting yourself on this page. How you choose to edit from here on out is up to you.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 23:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chuck Norris biography 

message: Please remove your comments from this page which are not DIRECTLY related to the subject of this article and editing it.  Your back and forth accusations belong off-wiki or at least in the user talk namespace.  Other editors like myself do not need to see this childish display of incivility.  Jerry 02:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, though I don't think you know the full history here.  I've removed language from my own posts, but not from those of others, because it doesn't seem like something I should do. TortureIsWrong 02:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank-you.  Jerry 22:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please review [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines]]