Talk:Kebira Crater

message: added a google maps view.  Someone could also add a .kmx file for google earth. Santaduck 04:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: maps

message: I changed this article a bit to make it clear that this thing is not a confirmed impact crater. Note the cautious wording in the first sentence of the original press release:  “….which may have been formed by a meteorite impact…”. Unfortunately, many of the media stories that sprang out of the release missed the point that this is just a speculation based on remotely sensed data. As far as I’m aware the site hasn’t been investigated on the ground by El-Baz’s group, which is essential for confirmation. Some Italian scientists that have visited the area said they saw no evidence of impact near Kebira, but admit it does warrant further in situ investigations (PDF). 
The press release later says: “The reason why a crater this big had never been found before is something the scientists are speculating.” My guess is that crater hunting geologists probably have spotted it before, but have been cautious in the absence of field data. There are lots of circular features in the general area, and some of these have previously been suggested as impact craters, but this now appear to be incorrect (see the PDF linked above). However, the nearby Oasis and BP impact structures are well documented. 
BTW, this is not the first time El-Baz has reported potential impact craters in the area. In 1981 he reported a crater (Google Maps) 150 km ESE of Kebira, that he said had “…characteristics … similar to those of meteorite impact craters…” (Abstract). It turned out to be a volcano and is now called El-Baz volcanic crater. PeterWH 09:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the general lack of any evidence for it being a "crater" of any sort, maybe the name of this article should be changed to something more generic, i.e. "Kebira feature," and convert the original "Kebira Crater" article into a a redirect because that is what this feature is known as. At this time, it quite misleading to people have the article remain as the "Kebira Crater." In my opinion, there is not even enough substance to it to call it a "structure." Paul H. (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a confirmed impact crater (... or rather confirmed NOT an impact crater)

message: There are a series of Flickr images of this area that are CC - By tagged (and thus good for upload to commons).  One in particular seems to show this crater.  If any one can identify it, this should be uploaded and used here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/98489045@N00/388092005/in/set-72157594548627625/
T L Miles (talk) 02:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kebira Crater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130624203220/http://www.b14643.de/Sahara/index.htm to http://www.b14643.de/Sahara/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060412075628/http://www.bu.edu/phpbin/news/releases/display.php?id=1073 to http://www.bu.edu/phpbin/news/releases/display.php?id=1073
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified