Talk:Rajmohan Pillai

message: Many times in December 2008 and January 2009, the creator of this article User:Vinodgr (talk), a newly-registered editor User:Z16bsr2 (talk) and various anonymous IP editors have repeatedly deleted the paragraph about Pillai's fraud conviction, usually without stating any rationale in the edit summary. The only reasons given for such deletions have been:
:Portion which is violating the policy of biography of a living person --User:Z16bsr2 
:The last paragraph is unwarranted and cannot be justified, Hence it is bad to malign any persons name without a reason. --User:Vinodgr
The matter was discussed at the Biographies of Living People Noticeboard and reinstatement of the paragraph was approved on the grounds that
:once convicted, his status is that of a criminal until cleared by a higher court or some other means - he *has* been convicted. As long as we are simply reporting the facts, and those appear in a reliable source, there is no BLP issue.
Please discuss the matter here if there are any further arguments based on Wikipedia policies which would support deletion of this material. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclusure of criminal conviction 

message: Although Mr Pillai has appealed his conviction,  would be justified for the time being by the existing conviction. Are there any policy arguments against it? - Fayenatic (talk) 14:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I will add the category. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorisation based on conviction

message: An editor referred to Indian newspapers as reporting his appeal, here:
:Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive56#Regarding removal of portions which violates BLP
I have mentioned the appeal in this article, but tagged it as needing verification. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now removed as unsourced. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Confirming that evidence of appeal exists -- both on the website cited from the article, and by email. The wording of the decision (dated 18 Dec 2008, key portions only) is that "the High Court... suspend[s] the sentence till the disposal of the criminal appeal..." There is no comment on the sentence in this ruling; the only point relevant is that execution of the original sentence is to be suspended since the subject has filed an appeal. If imprisoned, the subject is also released on bail until the appeal is determined. FT2 (Talk | email) 12:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeal

message: I removed the following section as relating to Rajan Pillai rather than to Beta Group. Rajan appears to be a sufficiently notable figure to be the subject of a separate article, but I have not seen a reason to keep this material in Rajmohan Pillai's article. 
* Beta Group was instrumental in Coca Cola’s foray into India in 1991 when it was set up as a joint venture, with Beta Group owning 60% stake. After operating the joint venture successfully for 3 years, Coca Cola bought out the majority stake and started operations directly in India from 1993.
* Beta Group (10%) along with American cookie company RJR Nabisco Inc (38%), were the major stake holders in Britannia Industries Ltd from 1982. Britannia Industries Ltd manufactures and sells biscuits, cookies, bread, rusk, cakes and dairy products across the world. Britannia is the market leader of biscuits in India. Beta Group took control of Britannia in 1987 buying out the shares of Nabisco and lead Britannia operations internationally till 1996 when it was taken over by the Wadia Group. 
* Beta Group along with Tata Group were the promoters of Indian Resorts Hotels Ltd. which started its operations in Goa. Indian Resorts Hotels Ltd. was later merged with the The Indian Hotel Ltd, which operates the Taj Group of Hotels worldwide. 
- Fayenatic (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rajan Pillai 

message: Your edits violate WP:NPOV and are not suitable for this article. Please stop reverting or you will be blocked for edit warring. shoy (reactions) 15:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war