lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:C (disambiguation)

message: I recommend splitting this page, moving the elements that are C as "symbol" out to C (symbol), and then concentrating this page strictly on those elements for which C is a genuine disambig.  For an example, see:
* A (disambiguation), A (symbol)
There also needs to be some cleanup here per WP:MOSDAB, in terms of section headers, and ensuring that there's only one link per line.  FYI, Elonka 07:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: C does not stand for the speed of light, in mathematics it refers to value that does not change.
99.194.152.211 (talk) 02:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  C  is not the Speed of Light
Talk:Pkgsrc

message: I'm missing info about relation and comparison of FreeBSD/OpenBSD ports tree & packages to pkgsrc. 158.193.139.103 15:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is comparison table on FreeBSD's Ports ToDo list. It lists pkgsrc as well. 95.24.86.242 (talk) 14:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison of BSD ports systems 

message: https://www.illumos.org/projects/worsoe  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.24.155.216 (talk) 07:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Port for Illumos 

message: What does an article like this need content-wise in order to remove its stub status? -- Qeek (talk) 11:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:STUB for the criteria used to determine if an article is a stub. I'd say this one is now more than a stub. Regards, Letdorf (talk) 18:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can I improve this? 

message: Looks like in the future Dragonfly will move away from pkgsrc to dports - http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/2013-September/062975.html .
31.185.170.190 (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragonfly to move away from pkgsrc
Talk:Siemreap

message: Apologies if the account sounds a goody-goody side of Siem Reap. When visiting there recently, I was shocked by the poverty, and the sex-tourism that obviously gives an impetus to the local sex industry. Any inputs on that possible? Even the so-called 'sex guides' are offering scary accounts of Cambodia. It would be nice if some local inputs could be added to give a more realistic perception (rather than a visitors' viewpoint). --219.65.29.226 12:28, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The seamier side
Talk:Occlusion

message: In computer graphics and image processing, occlusion is the effect of one object in 3-D space blocking another object from view.
I was trying to disambiguate the 3-D link, but I was not sure if I should link it to Dimension or 3D computer graphics. Since computer graphics is linked in the sentence, and 3D refers to "space", my preference goes to Dimension but I think discussion is necessary.
--Theroachman 12:56, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I've reworked this page back into the WP:MOSDAB format.  There was a lot of additional material not appropriate for a DAB page, but I hated to discard it, so I've copied it below if someone wants to integrate it into the appropriate articles elsewhere.  Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 18:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left over material from page revision
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew)

message: and others, re : MOS:SINGLE applies to glosses, such as a translation in parentheses following a term in another language. Note that all the  templates use single quotemarks, consistent with this guideline. Ibadibam (talk) 04:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand now. Thank you for explaining this. Debresser (talk) 15:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  My pleasure! Ibadibam (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single quotes for glosses 

message: Per an explanation by User Debresser, I clarified that the apostrophe does not transliterate alef or ayin, neither of which are transcribed, but is instead a mere punctuation mark that separates vowels in hiatus (e.g. be'er has two vowels, whereas beer might be read as having one vowel), which in Hebrew script happen to be indicated by an alef or ayin. 
However, the conventions also state "an apostrophe will be used to indicate a short stop." I tagged that for clarification, since I have no idea what a "short stop" is. (I would assume a glottal stop, if that didn't contradict the consonant table, which states that glottal stop is not transcribed. Debresser suggests it may be a syllable break, mal-akh rather than ma-lakh, like English basking vs bass king.) Also tagged for clarification how <z"l> is a "Standard Anglicized name" like 'Moses'. I'd tagged it before, but the fix made when the tag was removed didn't clarify anything for me. — kwami (talk) 05:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: z"l is commonly used in English – see use in news articles. I think what was confusing the issue was the link to "Standard Anglicized name" (as this is a term rather than a name), so I have removed the link. Number 57 09:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

text: It might be helpful to note that while wiki style does not use them, there are transliteration conventions that use ‘ and ’ for א and ע. Also, would it be TMI to mention the full phrase  in the reference to z"l? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 12:40, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophes
Talk:Napier-Bentley

message: This car has since obtained an upgrade to its engine http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/classiccars/8194036/Christmas-road-test-Packard-engined-Bentley.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.51.172.9 (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine Upgrade 

message: I've had a stab at a template for racing cars (see template:Racing car) to summarise the usual data. I've used the F1 templates as a starting point and applied it to the Brabham BT46 article. If anyone's got an interest in this, please have a look at the template and modify or suggest changes as appropriate. After a few people have had a go at it and we have something we're happy with we could start to use it more widely. Note that it's not meant to be specific to F1, by the way. Cheers. 4u1e 10:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Racing car template

message: The article states: "It is seen regularly at historic racing events..." Does this actually race, or is it only demonstrated?  In what class of racing did it compete when it was built, and when it was rebuilt after damaging its first chassis? Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw it racing at a VSCC meeting on the old Silverstone short circuit in the mid-1990s, where it was up against a mixed bag of pre-WW2 sports cars.  It was rather slow, not least because being under-endowed with brakes the driver was having to lift off halfway down the straight, accompanied by the usual pops, bangs and sheets of flame that are the telltale signs of a healthy Lion on the overrun.  Its race ended in the kitty litter on the outside of Becketts, drawing the ire of the bloke standing next to me as he had spent the entire morning fitting it with new tyres. Mr Larrington (talk) 01:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In what kind of races did it compete?
Talk:Full Impact

message: I added . Parts of the article sound fine, but other parts sound a little too informal – even melodramatic – for an encyclopedia article. -- Gsp 13:29, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be happy to re-word, but I can't really see what you mean. What portions would you consider "melodramatic", for instance? Maury 18:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

text: All excellent suggestions, let me see what I can do. Maury 12:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: do not exist 84.16.123.194 (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link
Talk:Pawleys Island, South Carolina

message: Pawley's Island has a major tourism system. There are a good number of condominiums with shared private beaches and abundant hotels, miniature golf courses, and arcades. Krabby Mike's, the massive multi-course restuarant shaped like a novelty lighthouse and adorned with all sorts of decorations, is highly notable but uncitable. They have a website, you folks can check that for natability.
However, how do you cite tourism? I mean, I can't reference it saying "I go anually and have seen it" because that's a primary unpublished source. I have pictures, though.
--TurtleShroom! :) I like turtles. THE TURTLE'S OVER NINE THOUSAND! Madness? NO, THIS IS GOOMBA! 00:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism 

message: Those sections belong on a different type of page. This is an article about the town, not an advertisement in a pamphlet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.4.100.155 (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting sections "Outside the Island" and "Points of Interest" 

message: Less information is never an improvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JDMonahan (talk • contribs) 18:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undid deletion of sections "Outside the Island" and "Points of Interest" 

message: The Gray Man is basically the only thing people outside of SC know about the island.  It needs a section. 68.156.95.34 (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Gray Man 
Talk:Friarton Bridge

message: I'm not seeing the electricity pylons in the photograph that the bridge is supposed to cross. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 11:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ordnance Survey map appears to show the pylons stopping just short of the bridge on either side, and this Geograph image appears to confirm that at the western side.  In any case the pylons seem to be of no particluar note, so I will remove them from the article.  --Deskford (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pylons
Talk:Swiss Air Force

message: Use of the term "luftwaffe"
I would like to propose a discussion of the use of the term 'luftwaffe' (also 'the luftwaffe' or 'Swiss luftwaffe'). I believe it is a bit confusing to use this term, given that the term 'Swiss Air Force' is officially used on the website of the Swiss Armed Forces. I would propose to use 'Swiss Air Force' throughout the article, unless it is related to the German term (and then it would have to be 'Die Luftwaffe'), or to the historic term, which however used to be "Flieger- und Fliegerabwehrtruppen". DBO-wiki (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the term to "Air Force" wherever it was not specifically quoting the German name. "Luftwaffe" in English refers to the German Air Force (especially in WW II). Besides, Switzerland is a multilingual country; German ought not to be privileged. 84.227.230.70 (talk) 20:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Norman Lloyd Johnson

message: My feeling is that this category should not be used for individuals associated with UCL.  I added this person to "professors" as a reasonable alternative place to put him.  If preferred we could have :Category:UCL lecturers (or being very pedantic :Category:UCL assistant lecturers), but I really do not think Norman Lloyd Johnson is in the same category as Jeremy Bentham when talking about UCL.  --stochata 14:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough not to list everyone associated with UCL in this category.  However, being not at all pedantic I cannot understand why someone who was an assistant lecturer, then lecturer, then reader should only be listed as an assistant lecturer! RachelBrown 09:44, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, I was being facetious with the "assistant lecturer", and had I read the article I would have realised he became a reader... you have hit upon a complete failing with my "UCL professors" category.  In retrospect perhaps "UCL academics" would be more appropriate.  I can set this up.  What do you think?  (The current system also miscategorises A. S. Byatt.) --stochata 09:53, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Excellent idea. RachelBrown 12:53, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:University College London]]
Talk:Tummo

message: The reason given was that it's "woo", except that none of it is. The section, besides being absolutely relevant to the topic, cites sources nobody so far has complained about. So is there now a problem with the sources? If so, what? Because removing a whole chunk of the article and then citing "woo" as the reason is hardly something I can have good faith in. déhanchements (talk) 06:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Any sources here would need to be WP:MEDRS. Alexbrn (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Descriptions of biophysical phenomena are WP:Biomedical information, which is why you are producing medical journals. Any such source must be WP:MEDRS. Alexbrn (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2002/04/meditation-dramatically-changes-body-temperatures/, which was in the section, be a secondary source by the definition laid out in WP:MEDRS? déhanchements (talk) 02:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No. We need something like a review article or statement from a major medical body. Alexbrn (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the 'scientific discussion' section removed?
Talk:Cleveland Barons (1937–1973)

message: According to hockeydb.com, it appears that the Barons split the 1972-73 between homes in Cleveland, Ohio and Jacksonville, Florida. Does anyone have information that could elaborate on this? Flibirigit 21:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a post I found a forum.  Gil Hannebohn states "The old WHA decided to put a team in Cleveland called the Crusaders (I believe Gerry Cheevers played for them for a while).  It split up the fan base and the Barons couldn't compete.  So halfway through the '72 season, the owner decided to pack them up and move them to Jacksonville." Flibirigit 22:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming this is true, does anyone know a date of a move, or to which arena in Jacksonville? Flibirigit 22:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  As it happens, I do.  The team moved February 9, 1973, and played in the Jacksonville Memorial Coliseum.  Yer welcome.  (grins)  Ravenswing 01:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1972-73 AHL Season

message: Is there any possibility that the Jacksonville Barons from 1973-74 were relocated, becoming the Syracuse Eagles of 1974-75? There were seven players who played for both teams. (Dick Sarrazin, Cal Swenson, Steve Warr, Al Rycroft, Billy Orr, John Hanna, Ron Morgan) John Hanna was also a player/coach for both teams. Or is this just a coincidence? Flibirigit 18:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to the AHL's record books.  Of course, the NHL team affiliated with the Barons had to send their players somewhere the year following; Syracuse was as good a locale as any, I suppose.  Ravenswing 19:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, just a coincidence then. Flibirigit 19:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jacksonville folds or moves?

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit 16:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:ClevelandBarons4.gif]]
Talk:Stratum lucidum

message: Just to add a bit of complexity, the stratum lucidum is also a layer of the hippocampus between the stratum pyramidale and the stratum radiatum.  Does anyone think this warrants a disambiguation and a split?  Is anyone actually bothered?  I have a natural tendency towards laziness, plus I'm really supposed to be doing something else, so I'm unlikely to do this and create a new stub for hippocampal strata any time soon.  Sorry.  Just thought I'd mention it.  HilJackson 22:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added stratum lucidum of hippocampus. Feel free to expand as needed. --Arcadian 00:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: *I edited the wording... how is it now? kilbad (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stratum lucidum in hippocampus 

message: The stratum corneum is outside of the stratum lucidum. The article on the stratum corneum now includes this in the lead paragraph:  
 There has been a long standing belief in dermatology that the stratum corneum consisted of dead cells (corneocytes), devoid of biological activity and function. The stratum coreum is now understood as live tissue and performs protective and adaptive physiological functions ...
I'm no expert; but if the stratum corneum cells are considered "living", in some sense, then I would suppose that cells in the stratum lucidum are, also. However, that disagrees with the stratum lucidum article as it now exists. Perhaps one or both of the articles could be edited so they conform with each other. Or possibly the real experts on this disagree with each other, in which case the articles could reflect that diversity of opinion.  Oaklandguy (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the cells "dead"? Compare with article on stratum corneum
Talk:Habibullah Kalakani

message: This article just about need a rewrite (e.g. too many redlinks).  There is material at  (but a published referecne would be preferable). RJFJR 14:31, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
I am in the process of rewriting this page, wish me luck =) --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 03:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anti-abortion feminism

message: Anyone active on this page care to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Wave Feminists and the possibility of redirecting New Wave Feminists here?E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Wave Feminists]]

message: Reverted "pro-life" to "anti-abortion" as this is the agreed-on neutral terminology here. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: Removed the sentence and citation since the citation did not support the added content. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plato.stanford 

message: The views and goals section predominantly cites the research of Laury Oaks, who is not herself a pro-life feminist.  The prose here would be more appropriate for a "Criticism" section - while directly citing mission statements of pro-life feminist organizations would better sum up their views + goals. 2600:4040:4018:C700:D022:7CD4:58B0:CEFC (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mission statements may be ignored in practice. We should always look to the highest quality sources for the views and goals of the anti-abortion groups. Wikipedia is built on WP:SECONDARY sources, preferring them in most cases to primary sources coming from the subjects themselves. Uninvolved observers are preferred because they interpret the issues or confirm the facts. Binksternet (talk) 22:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views and Goals section does not explain how these groups view themselves
Talk:United States Indo-Pacific Command

message: The article starts of stating that only the President, Commander In Chief, and his joint command councils have authority over the Pacific Fleet.  That is technically in error, because the Secretary Of Defense, by Law, is second in command of the military. User:MPA — Preceding unsigned comment added by MPA (talk • contribs) 14:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold. Give us a cite for the law and make the change. Jinian 16:06, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chain of Command over the Pacific Fleet? 

message: Other commanders in other articles are neatly boxed. Does anyone know the editing code to do so? Colonel Marksman 17:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Previous Comm.

message: The image needs to be updated to deal with the transfer of Madagascar (and other relatively close islands) from PACOM to AFRICOM.
: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naraht (talk • contribs) 13:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image update needed. 

message: The article starts off with CINCPAC, then starts using it interchangably with PACOM. I came to find when the change occured in actuality to no avail.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.128.41 (talk) 18:08, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  CINCPAC vs PACOM 

message: The header states that the renaming of PACOM to INDOPACOM was in recognition of the US's alliance with India while the body of the article says it relates to the Indian and Pacific Oceans being withing the Command's scope.  The latter is correct and the former should be changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:9301:9CAD:54D2:DA1:93A3:3CEF (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Garuda28 (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  INDOPACOM Name 

message: SOCKOR is a Subunified Command under SOCOM with Operational Command (OPCON) delegated down to the USFK Commander. Should it be placed on the table as its own entry like it currently is, or should it be incorporated into the "Subordinate Commands" of USFK? Tsubasa-Minoru (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement of SOCKOR in "Subunified Commands" 

message: I'm struggling to see how INDOPACOM extends up to the arctic, as stated in the lead. Perhaps when it included Alaska in its AOR, but that is now part of USNORTHCOM. INDOPACOM clearly stretches down to Antartica, but every map I look at has USNORTHCOM and USEUCOM stretching north to the arctic. I am not removing this yet, since I am conscious of WP:NOR and I have yet to find a reliable source that actually lists the coordinates (another issue with this article is lack of citations for the coordinates listed in various places throughout- feels like more WP:OR). Would propose removing mention of the arctic and the actual coordinates throughout in the absence of a RS.  Schwinnspeed (talk) 03:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artic to Antartic
Talk:Rocket mail

message: This article cuts off rather suddenly.  I think some additional discussion about the problems with rocket mail and why it did not catch on would be a good addition at the end of the article.
: Agreed.  For the reasons stated in the introduction: "cost of schemes" and "numerous failures", only "failures" was expanded upon.  I would imagine the current mail delivery system would not be much more expensive than rocket mail...airplanes can blow up too.  And with current technology it could be just as safe and inexpensive. -- Bubbachuck 17:02, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is something that I intend to work on.  It appeared on DYK faster than I expected, so I've not yet had time to fill in some details, including other attempts and the costings.  violet/riga (t) 18:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 posts