lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Ken Loach

message: As I have added some of Loach's television work to the template, it seems appropriate to substitute "the work" for "films" in the title, as "television play" would be the pedantic description for those items. The dates were added for ease of editing and navigation. Philip Cross (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: I have changed the title of the template to Works directed by Ken Loach, from Films directed by Ken Loach. This is because, as was noted above in a comment several years ago, the category contains television plays directed by Loach as well as films. I think it is entirely appropriate for these plays to be included as they helped make Loach's reputation as a director. Also Loach's direction of  works that were part of the  The Wednesday Play series, notably Cathy Come Home and Up the Junction is significant as these are considered highly important works in British television history. Indeed it could be argued that they made more of a cultural impact than the majority of Loach's films. Thus, I think not having them in the template would be odd. However, clearly including them means that describing the template as films directed by Loach was misleading, hence my change of title. If anyone disagrees I am happ to discuss further. Dunarc (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Tonight (1999 TV programme)

message: As I've Michael really is my hero or uncle. Siyanda Cashibe (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siyanda Cashibe
Talk:All Around My Hat (song)

message: I've reformed the page to be a bit more like what I had envisioned for the use of this boilerplate.  That doesn't mean it's finished, though :).  
Anyway, some comments:
* Under the "Music" heading, there's a sentence about John Ford that doesn't make sense -- is a word left out?  
* I changed the Eddie Butcher one to "Another Man's Wedding", because "Another Man Wedding" didn't make sense to me
* Made various other changes throughout
-- TimNelson 04:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The user "Hornplease" duplicated the entire Steeleye Span text. Please don't do this. It's already there, further down the page. If you input any other verions please ensure that they are in chronological order. Ogg 08:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication 

message: There is something wrong with the URL in footnote 3. I was unable to fix the cite. Could someone fix that? PraeceptorIP (talk) 16:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  URL problem 
Talk:Average cost

message: I know that the upshot of doing that would be to just show off. But they may be interesting to look at :D. 118.90.44.104 (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal proofs of the various assertions near the end
Talk:Knockeyon

message: Knockeyon isn't listed here List of Marilyns in Ireland. Are you sure it's a Marlyin? (Sarah777 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marylin Mountain?
Talk:Broker-dealer

message: "Although many broker-dealers are "independent" firms solely involved in broker-dealer services, many others are business units or subsidiaries of commercial banks, investment banks or investment companies."
No.  There is no broker-dealer that is a subsidiary of an investment company.  This phrase (investment company) doesn't mean what you think it does. HedgeFundBob (talk) 07:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A broker is a registered entity which buys and sells securities for its clients or for its own account. When buying for a client, it is acting in an agency capacity. When buying for its own account, it is acting in a principal capacity. The difference between a broker and a dealer has to do with the capital raising function. The vast majority of broker-dealer firms are engaged only in brokering, that is buying and selling securities. Dealers are involved in bringing new issues of securities to marker. WikeDorset (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro: "Investment Companies" 

message: ©J_StarLightBlueSky™ For ROWOON, KIM (KPopStar Icon Most Influenced Enterprise) Sponsorships 103.108.31.90 (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ©J_StarLightBlueSky™ For ROWOON, KIM (KPopStar Icon Most Influenced Enterprise)
Talk:Budget process

message: "Budgeting needs to be very much focused and clearly prepared so that it covers all of the financial constraints in that sense that any of the investments that would be planned in the future will cover the financial targets of the firm, its viability should be in due course of the firm’s overall strategic financial plan, the routine and daily occurring expenses will have their proportionate allocation so that any investment will be in a way that will not hurt any of the scheduled existing expenses of the firm. Budgeting needs to be done in a proper and meaningful way that covers all the financial targets of the company, these targets needs to be achieved in order to be called successful budgeting. Financial budgeting is also referred to as an investment appraisal that finalizes and clearly shows that the investment through which the firm will be going must have fulfilled all financial targets."
173.25.54.191 (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted from intro
Talk:Business-to-government

message: B2G is clearly not B2C. It is reasonably similar to B2B or maybe B2-big-business, but it is completely diferent from B2C. Has almost nothing to do with B2C.
In fact, there are 3 particular markets, overall:
* B2C (which is the most studied).
* B2B (with a sub-case: Business-to-Big-Business, which is a bit different) - very analyzed.
* B2G - there is very little research on this, but there is some.
I am currently studying the topic, B2G and I might have some interesting inputs.
I've spent some 6 months on this topic, but I havent finished my research yet.
The current article is indeed a stub and needs improvement.
I will get back to this page and update it, after I finish my research. At this moment, I still have some research and documention to do - but I will certainly return. Stemrv (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting topic, I will update it shortly
Talk:Vic Gonsalves

message: What to make of this: http://www.knvb.nl/oranje/programma/opstelling?match_id=12 ? Did he not play in this match? Drmies (talk) 02:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 caps? 
Talk:Cadbury Report

message: Robert Mazwell died in November 1991 not in 1990 as stated. 
In May 1991, the Financial Reporting Council, the London Stock Exchange and the accountancy profession had already set up a committee on the "Financial Aspects of
Corporate Governance."
Patience62 (talk) 22:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whenever he died, his name is Maxwell. 'Already' is spelt thus. 86.185.221.149 (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Accuracy Problem

message: Articles relevant to this page:
*Pages 47-48 of Corporate Law and Governance discusses this. I'm reluctant to add it until I know a bit more. II | (t - c) 01:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: I think The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance is the official name of this report, so I have create a redirect page from there to here.
--Kevinkor2 (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance 

message: "According to The National Computing Centre..." is not followed by a statement or statements, and therefore makes no sense itself as a statement.  I find it hard to see the intent of this section. It sorely needs reworking. "Pij" (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History lesson: Cadbury 1992
Talk:Stop, Drop and Roll (song)

message: Stop, Drop and Roll is also the name of an album by profane internet rock critic Mark Prindle. It's not yet notable enough for a writeup (indeed, Mark Prindle himself doesn't have a writeup), but there's always the long tail. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prindle
Talk:Commercialism

message: This article is no more than an unreferenced opinion about the meaning of commercialism. It needs to be re-written or removed. Unimaize (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Anti-commercialism should absolutely have it's own page. It's a whole movement and there is a LOT to say about it besides "it is against commercialism." Why doesn't it have it's own page???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.236.210.221 (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-commercialism

message: Why is that still here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.169.31 (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-fried chickenism 
Talk:Consumer spending

message: An unregistered user deleted the phrase about saving vs spending causing the 2008 depression. The rerfenced article did infer that however. It is true that it did not say it caused it in the first place but that consumer fears leading to saving was extending the depression. I'm not going to revert the edit but this is all true, of course. Wouldn't hurt to have a dedicated reference say the same thing.Student7 (talk) 16:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Drop in consumer spending causing depression

message: "That simple fact is what helped along the upper 1% gain 30% of the nation's consumer economy."
I have suspicions about what that is supposed to mean, and I'm willing to guess, but I have to wonder why guessing should be necessary, and maybe it's because the whole paragraph reads like something out of Newsweek, or The TV Guide.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.193.62 (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Consumerism
Talk:Contract curve

message: For context, some discussion of the larger pure exchange economy model (of which the contract curve is just a small part) would be helpful.  This is a very simple model used in welfare economics.  The building blocks include two consumers, fixed quantities of two goods, and normally structured (i.e. convex) preferences.  Agent X makes mutually beneficial trades with agent Y so long as X's marginal rate of substitution differs Y's.  Trade continues until MRS(X) = MRS (Y),the Pareto efficient solution.  On the diagram, Pareto Efficiency is the point where the two agents' indifference curves are tangent.  The contract curve is the locus of Pareto efficient equilibria, running from southwest to northeast in the Edgeworth Box.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhuitink (talk • contribs) 01:53, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Additions

message: Re: the contract curve is the individually rational subset of the Pareto set. In other words, it is the set of Pareto efficient allocations in an economy. - The Pareto set is the set of Pareto efficient allocations in an economy. The contract curve is the portion of the Pareto set lying  (connecting) between the agents initial endowments - and even that's not a universal definition. Volunteer Marek  10:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: The category "Simple mathematical analysis" needs to define terms  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.91.172.28 (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation
Talk:Countervailing duties

message: CVDs constitute an important subject in international trade.  Therefore there is a lot of work to do here:  Definition of subsidies, WTO rules, empirics... After working on anti-dumping I shall visit this article.  However if someone else can improve it a little bit meanwhile it would be great.  Evren Güldoğan (talk) 22:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of Work To Do Here
Talk:Crop insurance

message: she was so beaty  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.3.234.173 (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  kate ovando 
Talk:Ninja Gaiden (Game Gear)

message: This game did get released outside of Japan, right? So why does this one IP-Hopper keep saying it wasn't? Crboyer (talk) 04:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference seems to be clear here; I'd expect the IP user to provide at least one reference *against* that instead of vandalizing like this... I'll ask for semi-protection again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Release.
Talk:Leroy George

message: Stats for this season shouldn't include the week 11 game against Araz-Naxçıvan, as this games result was annulled. Including this appearance in the stats will show a discrepancy against the league totals etc.--Dave logic (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2014-15 APL stats
Talk:E-mini S&P

message: Hello, I'm proposing to move this article to "E-mini S&P 500" and delete the redirect on that page to this page. This page specifically talks about the "E-mini S&P 500" and that is the proper name of the contract on the CME exchange. 
See:
https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/e-mini-sandp500_contract_specifications.html
There's no such thing as a "E-mini S&P" futures contract; nor do I see "E-mini S&P" as a common shorthand for "E-mini S&P 500" (if anything most people shorten it to "E-mini" or even just say "S&P 500" when they actually mean the mini). Changing the name also avoids confusion with other contracts like "E-min S&P 500 ESG" or "E-mini S&P Midcap 400." So I think for those reasons the article should be renamed to "E-mini S&P 500". Eric.c.zhang (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Eric. I think that this article should be renamed to E-Mini S&P 500 as that is the official name of the futures contract on the CME (Globex) Jeffreythelibra (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose moving/renaming the article to "E-mini S&P 500" 

message: The last sentence of the opening paragraph ends with...
"the S&P 500 cash index closed at 2,767.32, making each E-mini contract a $138,366 bet."
Describing the contract value compared to the underlying S&P 500 as a "bet" is subjective, charged, and does not add any value to the description. While the author clearly thinks of trading as a bet, this contract can be many things, including hedge, where you WANT it to lose money. That is not a bet.
The sentence should simply end with:
"the S&P 500 cash index closed at 2,767.32, making each E-mini contract worth $138,366."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:4682:F200:B491:353:5986:A231 (talk) 15:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove "bet" from contract size description.  

message: Howdy fellow Wikipedians, I am thinking about adding some technical information about the E-Mini S&P 500 contract such as the contract specification, which would include tick size, minimum price fluctuation, position limits and maintenance and initial margin requirements. I think that this information would be helpful to readers in understanding how this futures contract works. https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/equities/sp/e-mini-sandp500.contractSpecs.html Jeffreythelibra (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to add information about the E-Mini S&P 500 contract specification
Talk:Economic security

message: I believe this section should be removed because it both references a non-existent article and lacks a source.
Houdinipeter (talk) 17:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the Other section 
Talk:Engel's law

message: The opening passage states: "as income rises, the proportion of income spent on food falls..." Who's income? Does this refer to individual income or a country's income, or some other group or class? Rkedge (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It applies to economic agents that act as final consumers. This includes all families and individuals. Essentially, it applies to everyone across every group. The more your income, the smaller the share of that income will be spent on food. For the rich and the poor both. 194.65.139.197 (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who does this apply to?
Talk:Entrepôt

message: So after reading both this article and the one on Free Port, I'm not sure I understand the difference between the two... Could someone clear this up for me? Thanks, Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also is Entrepôt still in usage today? Jonpatterns (talk) 18:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between this and [[Free Port]]? 

message: How are the major early (pre-1700) North American ports of New York City, Philadelphia and Boston missing from the list of entrepots?Dogru144 (talk) 07:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: New York and other major cities missing from North America examples?
Talk:VIVA (German TV channel)

message: The source for Viva meaning "Videoverwertungsanstalt" is truly stunningly bad. It seems clear to me that the article uses the term as a joking referral to Viva's business, and in no way claims that this would be the actual meaning behind the term.
Fix it. 91.10.31.252 (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truly horrible Source
Talk:Expected gain

message: It seems like expected return and expected gain have the same information, and reference each other on their pages.  I suggest merging the two pages.  Zfeinst (talk) 19:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[expected return]]
Talk:Financial freedom

message: The beginning of the article including the definition of "financial freedom" seems to come from 
; their terms of service are free but not free-as-in-freedom. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio 

message: The discussion is here. Protonk (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:WYPR

message: Taged with update, for the issues around Marc Stiner no longer being affilated with the station. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 20:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Why is there no mention whatsoever of The Signal, a show air on Fridays at noon (? I am not completely certain) and at 8? It is produced by Aaron Henkins and Lisa Morgan. I think the show is recognizable enough to have in the article. Does anyone agree?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.66.158 (talk) 23:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Signal
Talk:Stoned (Dido song)

message: I have checked Dido's official website and "Stoned" does not appear as a single there (even considering it's a vinyl single, apparently). I heard (or read?) somewhere it was released digitally, but the article features the artwork for the CD, so I'm kind of confused.
Also, isn't saying 'one view' using weasel words? That part of the article just seems like an opinion that could have been written by anyone. Wouldn't it be nice to add some sources? I mean the song isn't even mentioned on Dido's site.
Just my humble opinion.--QuadrivialMind (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Guaranteed investment certificate

message: What's the difference between a GIC and a time deposit? Should the two articles be linked somehow to show the relationship between the two? 142.103.207.10 (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time deposit 
Talk:Hicks–Marshall laws of derived demand

message: I haven't found any textbook references yet, but this might work for now. http://capone.mtsu.edu/pwr2b/marshalls%20demand.pdf
Blossomonte (talk) 07:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible References
Talk:Holding cost

message: The concept of Carrying cost seems strictly identical to me. As the terminology of carrying cost is more widespread, I would suggest to merge the present page into carrying cost.--Joannes Vermorel (talk) 11:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Indexation

message: Dr. Simonovits has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Simonovits has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Andras Simonovits, 2012. "Optimal Cap on Pension Contributions," IEHAS Discussion Papers 1208, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:23, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Simonovits's comment on this article
Talk:Turpan Depression

message: In the Introduction: "It includes the second lowest exposed point on the Earth's surface, after the Dead Sea".
In the 'Geology and relief' section":  "the third lowest elevation on the Earth's land surface (after the Dead Sea..."
Could someone correct this? Duncan.france 11:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incoherence regarding the position in list of deepest depressions on earth;s surface
Talk:International Financial Services Centre, Dublin

message: An IFSC is a general concept and this article should be about IFSCs and not necessarily this one. For example there is the Dubai IFSC, Botswana IFSC etc...
This article was originally set up to talk about the geographic area called the IFSC, the development of it and the buessineses in it. This is in Dublin, Ireland. This is the specific name of the area.
There is a more general term to describe financial services centres and international financial services centres  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.43.40.68 (talk) 13:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: IFSC Article specific to Ireland IFSC only

message: For us non-finance proles, could someone begin the article with a simple statement, as most Wikipedia articles have, of *what this is* as the article currently opens by jumping into history.  Is it a Special Economic Zone, a planning area, a mere concentration of some businesses?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.154.66.43 (talk) 09:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it?
Talk:Jensen's alpha

message: Should this article still be considered a stub? I don't know what exactly qualifies as a stub, but it seems like it has a little more than a minimum level of detail. άλφα7248Talk 02:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and have removed stub tag. Sargdub (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 
Talk:Key money

message: Taking a refundable deposit is illegal in US and UK? That's hard to believe.--87.162.39.101 (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

message: About France, the possibility to buy the lease from a preceding tenant is possible only if the place is used for commercial purposes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.121.17.118 (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe

message: "In the United Kingdom, it is illegal for landlords to require key money."
Total rubbish.  Landlords are perfectly entitled to take a security deposit (same thing) against unpaid rent or damage done to the property.  Recent (C. 3 years ago)changes in the law now require the deposit to be held by a third party.  However, this still does not prevent unscrupulous landlords deducting unneeded cleaning costs from the deposit.  109.156.49.202 (talk) 15:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect.