lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kumemura

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=OuSsxBuALQYC&pg=PA196#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Ga-5mPOr2-wC&pg=PR13#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=ddcV_cGegX4C&pg=PA125#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=ULyu8dNqS1sC&pg=PA39#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=3zBLjHeAGB0C&pg=PA165#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Fmmcu7S1BcEC&pg=PA330#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=566AlluiHT0C&pg=PA275#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=RXOrZUlF_OoC&pg=PA330#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=GSA_AaRdgioC&pg=PA220#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=y5yTBp_fk4oC&pg=PA171#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Ka6jNJcX_ygC&pg=PA145#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=vaAKJQyzpLkC&pg=PA76&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VNzgUamgGeTA4APUjYCACQ&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=37LxVhgIbJkC&pg=PA136&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VNzgUamgGeTA4APUjYCACQ&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=ULyu8dNqS1sC&pg=PA39&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VNzgUamgGeTA4APUjYCACQ&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=4z_JJfG-hyYC&pg=PA240&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VNzgUamgGeTA4APUjYCACQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=jIAKkMlFFQAC&pg=PA70&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VNzgUamgGeTA4APUjYCACQ&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=lbOau1trIMMC&pg=PA146&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Dd3gUZanO-zi4APK64CIBw&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=nWXwkb_xRNsC&pg=PA170&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Gt3gUclwl8rgA_zpgdAO&ved=0CCsQ6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=E10tnvapZt0C&pg=PA112&dq=kumemura&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Gt3gUclwl8rgA_zpgdAO&ved=0CDAQ6AEwATgU#v=onepage&q=kumemura&f=false
http://www.chinajapan.org/articles/11.1/11.1steben39-60.pdf
Rajmaan (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources on the Kumemura 
Talk:Boy-Cott-In the Industry

message: I don't understand the second meaning of boy-cott-in, what does cott mean?
It means he's caught up in the industry. KingRaven (>$.$)> (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:J. Pat O'Malley

message: The information added by an editor in October pertaining to Grammy awards appears to be false. It is contradicted by the Grammy award winners lists, so I'm removing this information and have left a note on the talk page of the editor who contributed this info. in October asking for his source. JGHowes talk -  17:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammy awards

message: Who cares about Mrs. O'Malley's Social Security number? Unclemikejb (talk) 23:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSN
Talk:The Beasts of Tarzan

message: Was this published in 1914 or 1916????
TheLateDentarthurdent 18:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I double checked both Bleiler and Tuck and it looks like the magazine serialization was 1914 with the book being published in 1916, so I've updated to reflect that. Rtrace 19:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Noam Chomsky/Archive 7

message: I'm a random user without much Chomsky knowledge, and I am finding the "Opinion on criticism of science culture" section difficult to parse. Where it says "Chomsky notes that critiques of 'white male science' ..." it doesn't define "white male science." On my first read, this made me believe that "white male science" was what was discussed in his first quote, and thus this second quote is a sort of continuation. But I do not understand how it follows.
So, my suggestion is for someone knowledgable on these matters to define "white male science" at some point in this section, and make it clear whether the second section follows from the first or if it is a separate quote on its own.
: The second quote is indeed separate from the first. I've tried to make that clearer. However, I thought it was rather self-evident from Chomsky's quote what he meant by "white male science", so I've not explained that further. rob 15:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing part of section 

message: Should Anarchist Federation (U.S.) be included somewhere? --Striver 00:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: links

message: I added the fact his father was a member of the IWW, which is obviously important in terms of his early influences.82.35.70.213 
:please provide evidence of this --Zleitzen 17:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine for me. Though I think it might have more relevance in the Politics of Noam Chomsky page and worded as IWW - there's just something disconcerting about reading a passage that says Noam was the son of Wobbly William Chomsky :) --Zleitzen 23:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HIS FATHER

message: I removed [ this link] from the external links section and it was brought back. For one thing, it uses WP:PEACOCK terms as "important commentary on Chomsky..." whilst if you actually look on the site it is an e-mail sent to ---- about a chapter he wrote on Chomsky. For one thing,  Alexa has no date] on this site, so it is not notable and the writer can be anyone since it is a random e-mail. Second, it is not even directly about Chomsky but rather about a book with a chapter regarding Chomsky. With these facts I think the only reason to put that link up here would be to promote that website considering the traffic this page gets which is not a good excuse to keep that link on the external links section.--Jersey Devil 14:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This has happened before and was rejected some time ago. User Atomist appears persistent in getting this link onto this page, despite some negative feedback on his user talk page. --Zleitzen 14:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed External Link

message: There's also a band called Chomsky. Should we make the search deal bring users to a page that provides links to the (as-yet uncreated) article on the band as well as the dude? I don't know anything about the band myself, except that they had a song that was in that movie Idle Hands. ... I'm so useless. :( :P Zanturaeon 08:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Page .. thingy ...
Talk:James Carnahan

message: Carnahan's role in the development of Canonsburg Academy/Jefferson College is unclear at the moment.   We do know that Carnahan and John McMillan, Western Pennsylvania missionary and founder of Canonsburg Academy, were close associates and former classmates at Princeton.   We know that he played a role in the founding of the Franklin Literary Society at Canonsburg Academy.  Per Centenary memorial of the planting and growth of Presbyterianism...', referenced in the article: 
*"[Canonsburg Academy] was happy, also, in its succession of principals and assistant instructors, such as Samuel Miller, James Mountain, James Carnahan, and John Watson.  The last of these became the first president of Jefferson College under the charter of 1802, while Mr. Carnahan reach afterwards the same high place in the College of New Jersey."
So, we need to know: What was his role in the academy? Instructor, principal, or other leadership role? When was he there? How does that time fit into his career at Princeton (especially since Canonsburg was in the frontier at that time).  Was he there as a favor to McMillan?--GrapedApe (talk) 13:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in Canonsburg Academy
Talk:Archibald Alexander

message: I am learning about Archibald in Mrs. Bennett's science class at Blytheville Middle School in Blytheville, Arkansas.
Home of the Chickasaws and the coolest people ever! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.29.170.254 (talk • contribs).
:Not that I don't think he's worthy of study, but why did he come up in a Middle School classroom? --Flex (talk|contribs) 21:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dragonlord (Dragon Quest)

message: The role of the descendant of the Dragon Lord, from Dragon Quest II, could be included here.  Since this could be a title, as well as a name, it would be proper.  Also, one could argue the Dragon Queen from Dragon Quest III is his mother.  Sadly, unless we find confirmation on that, it would be simply speculation, and likely deleted. This could be inferred by the origin of the Sphere of Light, which the Queen created by giving her life; in the game, something apparently lived within it (like a baby dragon inside its egg). Icecypher 21:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that we do need to include the information about his mother possibly being the Dragon in DQ III, because at the moment we do not have enough information to warrant his own page. We also might want to talk about his role in some of the Dragon Quest manga such as Emblem of Roto and Ryou Baribari TaiSMimas 21:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in Dragon Quest II (and Dragon Quest III) 

message: Mimas, do you have some info that could be added about the Dragon Lord based on his appearence on EoR? Icecypher 19:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emblem of Roto
Talk:Informal organization

message: This is just a definition of something that's fairly commonly understood, rather than something that's completely new. I thought it was important to post and will be adding links and references soon. 
21:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a definition

message: Does anybody know the source of the list of disadvantages of the informal organization?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jradetzky (talk • contribs) 11:20, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disadvantages of IO
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Oksana d'Harcourt

message: Non-notible (sic)? If she's in the French wikipédia, then maybe she's known by more people than only myself. Anyway, keep or delete, someone else will probably repeat the entry soon. Her being a porn actress first doesn't make her any less worthy and respectable: wiki's for those who want to know...
AnPrionsaBeag 21:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:James Hood

message: Was he a lifetime student?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.84.95.229 (talk) 03:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing that and mentioning it. I added his later life at the end. Usually, when someone dies and is notable for a certain event in time, we overlook the "real life" of the person (or we just don't have that info readily available). Nice catch! — WylieCoyote 12:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about his working life 

message: Why did Mr. Hood leave U. Alabama after two months?
When did he graduate from Wayne State? 142.255.2.182 (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational experience and time line 

message: More info re: reconciliation between Mr Hood and Mr. Wallace please! Wallace is often held up as a boogeyman of Jim Crow, but this article suggests there was a further evolution for him via Mr. Hood. Calling attention to reconciliation is vital, because reconciliation is vital! 142.255.2.182 (talk) 14:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconciliation
Talk:Career Clusters

message: There used to be a Wikipedia entry for "Career Cluster" but apparently it was assumed that the term was synonymous with Small Learning Communities, and it now re-directs there.  I try to point out the difference, and relationship, between Career Clusters and SLCs in this article.  Hopefully there will be some discussion before any major edits or redirects.  But this is Wikipedia.  John 21:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Career Cluster vs. SLC
Talk:Fort Vermilion

message: Under famous residents, I deleted the reference to a population of 840 residents from the sentence that discusses the 1976 version of Ghost Towns of Alberta as the source and date of this population is inconclusive.  A review of federal census counts for Fort Vermilion from 1956 to 2006 inclusive shows that it never once recorded exactly 840 residents as a result of these federal censuses.  The 1971 census recorded 740 while the 1976 census recorded 729. Perhaps 840 was Will Ferguson's estimate of the time in his writings? --Hwy43 (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1976 population? 
Talk:Panama Francis

message: a chart of some hits or well known but not hits of rock and R&B songs Francis played on.  If you do a search from these you will find the same list over and over again and it contains one (at least one) glaring error, Peggy Sue by Buddy Holly.  I'll write out why I believe this later, but for now please do not add that song to the chart. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am putting together 

message: as well as something about why it is significant.  Playing on demos is not that important.
:"He drummed on the Elvis Presley demos, and h"Carptrash (talk) 02:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs a reference
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sex Ant Toys

message: This article can not be deleted under Wikipedian Common Law. Arguments regarding the use of Google as a mean of determining how well known an article is should never be the only criteria for deletion. The information found in this article about the band Sex Ant Toys speaks the truth and can be verified through reliable published sources including, but not limted to Apple iTunes Music Store, the music label of Miss Mabry and the official website of the band. This article contains useful information as Sex Ant Toys approaches the release date of their first upcoming album through major digital download stores like iTunes, Napser, Sony Connect, Rhapsody, Zune, and Musicnet among others. Sex Ant Toys is a new act signed by a major music download distribution channel accross the world. I urge Wikipedia to take action in regards to this matter on behalf of the new music community that promotes the use of new mediums of communication and the new music revolution. This article for deletion should debated under all given circumstances before it is deleted. Clinton Clinton 09 DC 21:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are independent sources talking about this band, that will make quite a difference.  The references in the article right now don't count for much.  Friday (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: We have reliable sources and we are on the process of updating the Sex Ant Toys page. This page should not be deleted at this moment. We are working on it. The New We'rok Generation 22:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may wish to have a peek at WP:COI.  Friday (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Work on progress. We are currently updating according to Wikipedian Common laws 64.237.159.171 04:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)

message: I once asked this question. I was told there is an answer for those who come to the Help Desk or Teahouse saying their boss has told them to write a Wikipedia article about the company. That answer is not in the list of essays.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  19:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are looking for WP:When your boss tells you to edit Wikipedia.  S0091 (talk) 21:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  16:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  For ease of use, I have redirected Wikipedia:What do you tell your boss?, Wikipedia:What do you tell your boss, and Wikipedia:What to tell your boss to that essay. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do you tell your boss? 

message: There is a disagreement at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor (2nd nomination) about whether content written by an organization but republished verbatim by a third party is independent coverage of said organization.
Assistance in resolving this question would be appreciated. BilledMammal (talk) 12:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation of [[WP:ORGIND]] 

message: Animal breeds, especially ones that do not yet have recognition by governing orgs, are almost by definition products of commercial enterprises. Should they be evaluated under NCORP? I've been seeing some activity at AfC recently and realized pages on breeds can very easily become promotional vehicles for catteries. While such sources wouldn't be independent for GNG purposes either, a lot of other sources appear to be industry press or derived from what breeders say about their animals, and so the stronger enforcement of source independence from NCORP might be warranted. JoelleJay (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's not recognized, and the breed is solely marketed by a commercial enterprise, I would think WP:NPRODUCT applies. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would being recognized make it no longer a commercial product? JoelleJay (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It wouldn't; I just think that, practically speaking, you'd have a hard time overturning the consensus documented at WP:NSPECIES. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well breeds are definitely not different species and so are not covered by that essay. I would hope the editors who work in NSPECIES areas wouldn't recognize a national kennel club as having any academic sway! JoelleJay (talk) 00:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a lawyer, Joelle, not an animal handler. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal breeds
Talk:The Burgate School and Sixth Form

message: Victuallers 11:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

message: The remark "the teachers were only given 2 days notice to prepare them selves for the inspection and did spectacularly well." is not sourced and subjective/original research (i.e. not suitable for wikipedia). I have replaced it with a statement of the school and college's inspection grades from the most recent (2007) inspection report.JimChampion (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ofsted inspections
Template talk:Infobox anatomy

message: This template needs a Uses Infobox template like , , or .
Also it needs a list template like .
If there is no objection, I can create them.
Regards Shkuru Afshar (talk) 05:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, got it. In that case yes , very happy for you to do this and also, thanks for your initiative. You can create something like  and I'll have a double check regarding its accuracy when you're done, and  as the navbox. Please make sure you're editing the documentation pages (that's /doc) rather than the templates themselves. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

text: Thanks for that, I've edited one and the other template is fine to use. Please be careful to use them on the documentation pages and not the templates themselves :). --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses Infobox and list template 

message: Change this:
| label51 = TH
| data51 = .html }}
to this:
| label51 = TH
| data51 = 
In order to use the TerminologiaHistologica template and match Terminologia Embryologica and Terminologia Anatomica links. Anton.t.gregersen (talk) 18:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for proposing this change - one discussed at WT:ANAT. I have implemented the change and having tested it can confirm it produces a more useful result than previous. --Tom (LT) (talk) 03:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 24 February 2021 

message: Is there a reason why italics are automatically applied to this infobox's above field? This results in italics for terms/topics that aren't rendered with italics in prose, like Nervous system and Bone and Latissimus dorsi muscle. I plan on removing this if there isn't a reason. — Goszei (talk)  03:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed this feature. Please ping me if a revert is needed. — Goszei (talk)  06:51, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for default italics? 

message: Hello! I currently cannot edit the template. It would be great to have the Cell Ontology IDs showing up in the "cell" subtemplate. The Wikidata property is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P7963 and it has a few thousand uses on Wikidata. CL is the most prominent source of cell type IDs currently; Wikipedia would benefit from having it in pages like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_blood_cell.
I'd be happy to do anything needed, just let me know.
All the best, TiagoLubiana (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Cell Ontology IDs from Wikidata?
Talk:Serpens

message: History: write about how it was subdivided when the constellations were defined to be areas, not lines and conventions. Rursus declamavi;  21:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Picture in the infobox shows only one half of this constellation (Serpent's head).95.220.146.155 (talk) 08:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. The other half was missed. The corresponding SVG has been uploaded to Commons. Once the file name is corrected on Commons, then this can be fixed. Kxx (talk | contribs) 03:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Kxx (talk | contribs) 04:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: in response to your request at , here's some suggestions. Apologies for not getting back to you sooner! I want to spend more time reading through this article, and offering more suggestions for improvement, but this is probably enough to get on with for now!
* "Serpens is the only one of the 88 modern constellations to be split into two disconnected regions in the sky" - were there any other (non-modern) constellations that were similarly split?
*:Before the boundaries were set up, there were no well-defined barriers between constellations, so I don't think it's meaningful to refer to historical constellations as having either a continuous or divided region. I did do a search, though, and was unable to find anything. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you; I'll work on these when I get a chance. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Addendum: I should have plenty of time tomorrow to work on these, and will do so barring something unexpected happening. StringTheory11 (t • c) 04:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And we're all done, finally! StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  (belated) Thanks for making those changes! I'll post any further comments to the FAC page. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: Categorized as equatorial consstellation, but the lead says "northern hemisphere". Should we clarify that somewhere in the article? :Category:Equatorial constellations isn't a subcat of :Category:Northern constellations. Brandmeistertalk   07:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The constellation is split into two parts, and the equator crosses both of them. The smaller part lies mostly in the southern hemisphere and the bigger one lies mostly in the northern hemisphere. So, most of the constellation lies to the north of the equator overall. PlanetStar 20:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equatorial vs northern 

message: Psi Serpentis was determined to be a triple star system in 2015. Praemonitus (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psi Serpentis 

message: Why there are two images about Serpens Caput in the infobox? This is likely an error. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 19:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why there are two images about Serpens Caput in the infobox?