lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Texas Advance Directives Act

message: Primarily I added the NPOV tag because of the lack of references -- in particular, the statement that someone was forced to die "against her wishes" could be construed as biased unless there is a reference to it (say, in a news article) and the reference is cited in this article. Not a bad article, in general, but it could use some expansion. -- MatthewDBA 17:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion From Futile Care Law 

message: I just added oodles of references.
Well, maybe not oodles, but at least an oodle and a smidgen.
I hope that helps.
If nobody else addresses it, I'll flesh it out some more later.
NiftyDude 17:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Seems to me that this article is about the same the the "Advance Directives Act" is about.  At the very least I think there should be a link to that article for the words "The Futile Care Law" since that article actually explains what the law is.
192.52.57.33 16:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Advance Directives Act"? 

message: Has anyone here heard about the Andrea Clark case? There are a couple articles on it in the Houston Chronicle, here and here. More can be found with a quick google search.
:Oops, Forgot to sign in, and to leave my sig Linguofreak 19:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrea Clark Case 

message: Hi. The most prominent and I think initial law was passed in California. Should that be mentioned in here, along with other states? Don't think we need a different article for each state law, right? HG 15:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  other advance directives law 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support (I am editor who proposed move)24.0.133.234 (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The other cases section needs to be revised as the reference it links to no longer exists and may not be accurate. The current reference links to http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1172829796788 which no longer exists. The section of the wikipedia article currently claims that across ~16 or so hospitals, there were 974 medical futility consultations with only 65 letters in agreement.
In the article "Fine RL, Mayo TW. Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas advance directives. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:743-6." Fine states that during a two year period in just the Baylor Healthcare System, there were 43 letters in agreement. It seems like an odd mismatch that out of the total 65 letters in agreement, 43 were in one hospital system.
Yoosc 14:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Cases
Talk:New York State Route 146

message: I'm the one who added the NY 156 reference in Altamont; thanks to TMF for his method as I had originally put up a noaccess tag, instead of the "To" banner. Now, for Schenectady: 146 doesn't link to 890 East; it's just a link to the Thruway, as the control of the highway once its ramp merges is within Thruway control. With that I don't think the "West" banner is needed at the next intersection as 890 can only go west from there. Signs in the area don't ever say East 890, and I can check on if there's a "To West" or just a "To" 890 at NY 7's intersection (Curry Road). Further, NY 146 does have a noaccess crossing over I-890 and I have to research whether it's between exits 6 and 7, and what the mile marker should be. Fwgoebel 02:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NY 146 in Schenectady 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  See above  b (MoS):  See above notes.
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):   
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
:Well writen, and an interesting read. I quickly checked out about some stylistic concerns, but they seem to have been explained to me well. Pass. Maxim(talk) 20:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 5, 2006

message: I would argue that, while Joey is her most notable acting role, she is actually best known for being Tom Cruise's babymamma. Before that, she was just another up-and-coming actress. Just my 2¢.  youngamerican (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Requesting removal of red-link. Have failed to find free replacement. Thanks. Carcharoth 12:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 13:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request removal of link to deleted image
Talk:Taras Sokolyk

message: "Many believe Sokolyk was personally responsible for initiating the vote-splitting scheme"-- as whoever wrote this already knows, this is not true at all. Many do believe this but many also beleive that Taras was merely doing his job. I would hazard a guess that just as many people hold Mr. Gary Filmon personally responsable for this scandal. This article seems fairly biased and was written by someone who believes everything they read in the Winnipeg Free Press. [unsigned]
I've been trying to present the information in a neutral manner; my own view is that Sokolyk probably didn't initiate the scheme, but there are others who disagree.  Will changing "many" to "some" resolve the problem?  CJCurrie 20:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 6, 2006

message: Three edits:

 … and a sophisticated [[drainage]] system are an unusual marvel of engineering.
 … and a sophisticated [[drainage]] system are unusual marvels of engineering.
 It's scientists divided the [[horizon]] …
 Its scientists divided the [[horizon]] …
 … joint burials with the custom of [[Sati|sati]].
 … joint burials with the custom of [[Sati (practice)|sati]].

— MSchmahl 20:01, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:NP-intermediate

message: The way the article defines them, NP-intermediate problems would all have to be decision problems, since P and NP are both classes of such. Yet most of the candidates listed are not decision problems! Sometimes there is a straightforward decision problem counterpart of a more general problem, but in the case of for example integer factorisation I have no idea what that would be; testing an integer for being composite is already in P, so that can't be it. 90.129.219.218 (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are standard decision problem versions of factorization. For instance, is there a factor between 2 and x? Asking that question repeatedly would allow you to recover the factorization itself by binary search. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision problem or not?
Talk:1980 Grand Island tornado outbreak

message: I just added these states as categories. These states had confirmed tornadoes too, so I think that edit was appropriate.--Kevjgav (talk) 17:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added categories "tornadoes in IN, IA, OH, PA, MD and WV"

message: I also noticed that the dates were the same in both tornado tables, so I fixed possible vandalism on the "June 2 event" section.--Kevjgav (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also changed date on "June 2 event" from Tuesday, June 3, 1980" to Monday, June 2, 1980 
Talk:Armored Core: Master of Arena

message: I would suggest that just keep doing what you're doing and improving and helping people and and that's it. I never played some of these games I did have a Sega Genesis and a PlayStation for a little while but we got about midnight club PlayStation 2 the armored core Master you know midnight club straight racing PlayStation 2 Frontline Rugrats midnight club motor racing PS3 oh Need for speed high stakes PlayStation 1 and 1 PlayStation 1 PlayStation 2 Grand theft Auto San Andreas PlayStation 2 Osceola Mall 2600:6C5D:6300:DF12:9DFC:212:ABEF:32DF (talk) 23:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armored core master of arena this one and have many other PlayStation 1 2 and some threes I would like to sell them or somebody let me know a price range it would be great for somebody who can buy it thank you
Talk:Armored Core 2

message: Much, if not all of the article comes from the game itself, since it's more or less the only complete source, someone can remove the "No Sources" tag. And I will revise the article so take the other "Original Research" tag off too. Crazywacko 7713 (talk) 04:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then cite it as such. Then the Unreferenced and Original research tags can be removed. Next, 3rd party sources should be added to avoid Primarysources and Onesource.   — Chris Capoccia  T⁄C 05:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, you should read the No original research policy and the Toys & Games Notability policy, because I'm pretty sure that this article is a classic example of what is prohibited.   — Chris Capoccia  T⁄C 06:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone can remove the tag about lack of sourcing.
Talk:Anno 1602

message: Ubisoft announced Anno 2070 for Winter 2011
http://anno.de.ubi.com/newspost.php?news_id=12687  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.89.167.35 (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anno 2070 Announced 

message: The writing style of this page is extremely child-like and casual. I've rewritten a little bit of it, but I don't have time to do much more. --Milton 21:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style 

message: Should it be noted that the gameplay of the Anno series is very similar to the Caesar and Pharaoh games made by Impression Games?--71.217.15.67 (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay Similarities 

message: Someone knows, if there is a list of the music inside the game? --213.168.120.141 (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you can find a list with the music Anno 1602 Playlist. Maybe someone can integrate that in the article. The music was very important for manny players, and also contributed to the success of the game. Regards, 205.206.143.20 (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Smethwick Khalsa Football Federation F.C.

message: User 84.65.31.230 has changed the article to show the club's name as Smethwick Rangers, but I thought they had changed their name from that - that's certainly what this page says, also this one, also the local paper in this area always uses the SST name........ ChrisTheDude 20:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: What league the team playing 82.43.248.172 (talk) 11:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I’m looking for football team
Talk:Latch

message: Latches for residential locks should be classified seperately from commercial types of applications
:Perhaps this suggestion has merit. At present, there is no mention in this article of door bar hardware or storefront door hardware. No doubt someone with time on their hands could supplement the wiki with this sort of information. However, residential locks are currently available in commercial quality, so there tends to be little basis for excluding much from the article. ArthurOgawa (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residential versus commercial types 

message: can any one tell me what are latches in oracle 9i
:This query concerns a software concept. This article does not pertain.ArthurOgawa (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: mainly electrical latches, which are logical devices that hold a digital value.  see Latch for disambig. RJFJR (talk) 21:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software latch 

message: there is a photo of an 'hasp secured with a padlock' but nothing written on it. is a hasp considered a type of a latch or is it another fastening method?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenshak (talk • contribs) 16:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This question has merit. For the record, the article appears to treat a hasp as a type of latch, the latter being interpreted fairly broadly. ArthurOgawa (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Interpreted, but not at all explained.  The word "hasp" doesn't even appear in the article anywhere!  And so what is a hasp?  We do not know.  A loose necktie (talk) 04:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a hasp a latch? 

message: The opening section of the article says that a latch is not the same as a locking mechanism, but the image shows a barrel bolt, which is definitely a type of lock. 2600:1002:B017:D3E4:9A0F:789A:7C52:1830 (talk) 07:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barrel bolt lock
Talk:United States Adopted Name

message: United States Approved Name → United States Adopted Name – This is the correct name; United States Approved Name is incorrect...probably confused with British Approved Name (BAN) Joshnpowell 20:37, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The article doesn't mention why this is used while the rest of the world uses INN. I'm sure someone must know. 76.126.211.253 (talk) 08:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it's something I've always wanted to know. In my opinion it's (a) cultural hegemony, the US always thinks the world should do things their way and refuses to submit to international standards, and (b) drugs cost four times or more the price in the US than in say Canada or the rest of the world, so drugs companies wish to obfuscate drugs purchasing by US consumers by making it seem that certain medications are only available in the USA.Gymnophoria (talk) 11:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it used instead of INN? 

message: While the names are not trademarked it appears difficult to get a listing of all the names that have been approved.  It would be great if there was a link on the article to get such a list 73.30.100.198 (talk) 22:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of  the approved names
Talk:Nikon F5

message: I don't think that the line "It was the last flagship SLR made by Nikon" is correct.  As Nikon is still producing the Nikon F6 (the only film camera still being produced by Nikon, how could it not be their flagship film SLR?) and the Nikon D2X while not being a film camera it is still a Single-lens reflex camera.
:Easy.  The Nikon F6 is seen by many as the last Film SLR to be made by them.  While this is true, the F6 lacks the backing that the F1-5 enjoyed...  The F6 is akin to the Nikon Nsomethingorother, which was basically for those who wanted to do film, yet were used to the Dxx layout. KeineLust90 (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That still leaves the statement as essentially untrue. That Nikon devotees don't LIKE the F6 still leaves it as Nikon's film flagship in the present day lineup, and as Nikon's intended successor to the F5.  Also, Nikon digital SLRs are still SLRs and any such statement at either this article or the F6's needs the 'film' qualifier. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 19:55, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sempron 64

message: Is a separate Sempron 64 article necessary?  I'd recommend simply redirecting Sempron 64 to Sempron, and leaving the mention of the term in the original article. --Vossanova 20:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article merged with Sempron, changed to redirect. --Vossanova 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/People questioning the official American 9/11 account

message: Striver, why did you delete Pedant's comment and Mmx1's reply? Didn't Pedant just complain (I think mistakenly) about MONGO deleting comments from the discussion? Tom Harrison Talk 20:54, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting comments

message: Delete
# Tom Harrison Talk 15:14, 1 April 2006
# JJay 17:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote counting
Talk:Leaky gut syndrome

message: This article needs to talk about the topic of intestinal permeability, structures that fail in it, and its contribution to food allergy and autoimmune responses. It is rather preoccupied with bashing alternative medicine , which encompasses many practitioners of variable skill, some of whom are trying to address a real phenomenon, albeit with an unfortunate name and some misunderstandings. 2600:1700:95C0:38A0:BD80:7B1:1DC4:BBFA (talk) 04:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See intestinal permeability. Bon courage (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaky Gut 

message: We can expand the article with these sources , . Also an older article from Science-Based Medicine  Psychologist Guy (talk) 10:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: New articles debunking leaky gut myths
Talk:Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola

message: ΟΝΟΜΑΖΟΜΕ ΦΡΑΚΓΙΣΚΟΣ ΒΑΡΟΤΣΙΣ Ο ΠΑΠΟΥΣΜΟΥ ΙΝΕ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΡΕΘΙΜΝΟ ΚΡΙΤΙΣ ΑΠΟ ΑΥΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΜΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΕ ΞΕΡΟ ΟΤΙ ΚΑΤΑΓΟΜΕ ΑΠΟ ΤΙ ΙΚΟΓΕΝΙΑ ΤΟΝ BAROZZI ΟΙ ΟΠΙΟΙ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝΤΟ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΦΡΑΚΓΙΣΚΟ  ΤΟΝ ΙΑΚΟΒΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΝΔΡΕΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΝ ΑΤΖΟΥΛΙΝΟ ΚΑΙ ΗΤΑΝ ΦΕΟΥΔΑΡΧΕΣ ΕΠΙ ΕΝΕΤΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ.ΜΕ ΤΙ ΙΣΟΔΟ ΤΟΝ ΤΟΥΡΚΟΝ ΣΤΙ ΚΡΗΤΗ ΕΦΙΓΑΝ.ΑΝΑΖΙΤΟ ΕΑΝ ΑΥΤΑ ΑΛΙΘΕΒΟΥΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΑΝ ΥΠΑΡΧΟΥΝ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΠΟΓΟΝΗΤΟΥΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΙΤΑΛΙΑ fragiskos_barotsis@hotmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.119.155.3 (talk) 16:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fragiskos_barotsis@hotmail.com 

message: In the references section there was an entry: G. Loukmski, 1927. Remains a standard monograph. This is not what is properly called a reference. I have replaced this entry by:
*G.K. Loukomski, Vignole (Jacopo Barozzi da Vignola) (Series: Les grands architectes), Paris 1927 (Remains a standard monograph)
(The misspelling Loukmski has in the meantime proliferated on the web.) Theobald Tiger (talk) 06:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Loukmski 
Talk:Jewel Thief

message: In the movie Jewel Thief,there is a reference to Powai. Can anybody clarify whether the outdoor shooting happened near Powai Lake in Mumbai?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.146.118.145 (talk) 00:52, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Fluctuation loss

message: Does the distribution specified here match up with the Noncentral_chi-squared_distribution?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.231 (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Central Chi-Squared 

message: I think that some definitions are missing to explain the main formula, for an encyclopedic article. I'm thinking especially on I, and gamma (I think they are the Bessel and gamma fonction ? but I'm not sure enough to edit.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stepber (talk • contribs) 13:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some definitions are missing
Talk:Ugly Casanova

message: I don't see any mention of an Ugly Casanova record on the Sub Pop Records Singles Club discography page. Until there's some evidence (what were the songs, when was it released?) I'm deleting that bit.
--Our Bold Hero 21:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone have any information on the "things i can't remember" music video?  http://youtube.com/watch?v=490VUOksdTc
(Lhenslee (talk) 03:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Video

message: What does everyone think of adding 'edgar' to the current and/or past lineup, just to be cute?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.76.229.189 (talk) 03:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Edgar=
Talk:MorgueFile

message: Changing the article to add more information about the site, especially the MorgueFile Free License.  Also removed the paragraph about Doug Wiley which more appropriately belongs on the Morgue File page, where it already resides.  Not sure, but perhaps there needs to be a disambiguation page? Cielbie (talk) 10:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous edits

message: Something should be said about the compatibility of this license as it relates to Creative Commons licensing. I think that it is not compatible because it says, "You are prohibited from using this work in a stand alone manner." I do not know what that means, but it sounds like a non-free license and something which ought not be in Wikimedia Commons.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: MorgueFile Free License
Talk:Hot dog stand

message: There needs to be a citation regarding the "Hot Dog Stand" game, because the author makes an unsubstantiated claim that the player usually fails in his/her efforts to work at the stand. If this is to be included, it ought to have a longer description of the game, and more details. Zminer (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: New Stuff

message: This article needs to be expanded. Hot Dog Stands are extremely common in the United States. Knowitall 21:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it.  youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 18:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old misc stuff
Template talk:Nations at the 1972 Summer Olympics

message: I updated the list of nations to match the official report (found here). See the list of participants sorted by NOC starting on page 541.  That leaves 123 nations, which does not match the IOC figure of 121 nations (at this site), which is also what we list on the main page (1972 Summer Olympics).   I think one discrepancy is that three named athletes (all in cycling) from LBA do not appear to have competed.  I can't find the other one.  Andrwsc 21:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:No Fear

message: My psychology teacher said that the line was started by the KKK. This was a way to virally get people to support it and make them money and whatnot, even if they didn't know it. Is this true in any way? --Not a User
*did some research, its a rumour, see article, thanks for contributionSpencerk 21:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cleaned up a few punctuation errors, but in doing so I noticed that some brand quotes didn't make a lot of sense.  Can anyone verify that these are the actual, verbatim quotes?  Also, should the "Other uses" section be merged somehow with the other uses at the top of the page?  Thanks --Grant M 05:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes and Other Uses 

message: I removed the last paragraph of the article as it was basically nothing more than a commercial, and borderline spam. Coffee and TV 16:58, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Paragraph

message: The actual people who came up with the name NO FEAR are the Hamel brothers, Ray & Dan. They started it at their surf shop in Mission Beach,Ca. Hamel's Action Sports. They obviously subsequently sold it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.218.200.126 (talk) 20:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The real founder of the brand....