lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rock music in France

message: An IP inserted a lot of good informations in the article. I don't really understand why some people have reverted it. Ok it wasn't very wikified and had to be cleant, but it doesn't mean we have to delete it. The present article is a little ridiculous, the 80s are the best period of french rock (with bands like Noir Désir, Mano Negra, Téléphone, Négresse Vertes, etc), it's not even mentionned in the present article. I'm disappointed. Ajor 23:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: Françoise Hardy only made rock music in the 90's with Le danger. In the 60's it was mostly yéyé and pop music... Where is Jacques Dutronc? The article is incomplete...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.193.16.68 (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: The opening line of this article states that "French rock is a form of rock music produced in the French language. It is produced primarily in France, but also in other francophone countries."  Yet the list seems to exclusively consist of artists from France, and the "Word Rock" link box at the bottom of the page suggests that this article is intended to only cover French nationals. If the "French" in this case refers to the country and not the language, then we need to change the intro to reflect that fact. Funnyhat (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of "French rock"
Talk:Stryfe

message: Stryfe's mother was not Jean Grey, but rather her Phoenix created clone, Madelyne Pryor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.157.131 (talk) 23:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stryfe's mother
Talk:Franklin, New Hampshire

message: I drive by this farm every day on my way to work, I will try to get a picture for the article, in good weather.  This is not the DW birthplace on Rt 127, but the farm he owned and lived in on Rt 3.  There is a current story on this farm being recently protected from development, but I am not sure this article is the right place for it, and I am not sure the farm is important enough for it's own article (too local in interest).SailorfromNH 02:13, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniel Webster Farm 

message: Please see the discussion here. harpchad 15:15, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Infobox City NH with Infobox City? 
Talk:Charlotte spiral

message: shouldn't this page go directly to disambig?  I doubt many people who type charlotte are looking for a skating grace move. LegCircus 22:01, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A move (renaming) took place 23:19, 20 November 2005. (And the effectively orphaned HatNote was removed, by a different colleague, 37 seconds later!)--Jerzy•t 17:37, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Dab?)
Talk:Panther

message: ::I assume this was from the same source, but just for the record h:ngnshs, the Black panther article also says "it is a common misconception that panther means a melanistic individual." — Catiec 13:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:Bkonrad For most readers, the word dalit conveys no information without the link, and they must visit the page Dalit Panthers to understand this basic fact about the party. That is why I've reverted your edit. If you wish to restore it, please discuss it with me here first. Thank you. --Thnidu (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is not really relevant for disambiguation of the term "Panther" which is what this page is about. If you think the term dalit needs clarification, then rephrase the entry. The extra link is counter to disambiguation guidelines. older ≠ wiser 20:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  User:Bkonrad I accept your reasoning here and your reversion. --Thnidu (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  dalit 

message: What does the community think about adding certain fictional panthers, such as Black Panther or the Pink Panther.  We already list organizations with the term "panther" in it (e.g. The Black Panthers or the Gray Panthers").-Fogelmatrix (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional "Panthers"
Talk:White panther

message: I spent a lot of time creating and maintaining the original "White Panther" article only for someone to decide I had violated MY OWN copyright.  I have licensed the material from Messybeast.com for use on Wikipedia and the source page is marked as licensed under the GFDL.  Please DON'T delete it! When this sort of thing happens without the deleting party checking it out properly it is very, very discouraging to contributors who have licenced their own work.  Messybeast 21:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my experience, outside the US, "panther" implies "black panther", meaning a melanistic leopard or jaguar. Only in the US do people refer to Felis (Puma) Concoloras "panther". WorldAsWill (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I find the introduction problematic. First, there's this bizarre claim:
"Zoologically speaking, the term panther is synonymous with leopard."
 
I don't understand what that's supposed to mean. If there's a language for species in the science of zoology, it would surely be binomial nomenclature, agreed? And Panthera is not just Panthera pardus
And then there's this less bizarre but still confusing statement:
"The genus name Panthera is a taxonomic category that contains all the species of a particular group of felids"
A genus is always a taxonomic category that contains all the species that it contains. In fact, the particular group of felid species is the genus, in this case. Please rewrite.
WorldAsWill (talk) 07:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Silverback/Proposed decision

message: The current proposal is Silverback is limited to one revert per article, per week. If he should exceed this, he may be blocked for a short time, up to three days.
I'd like to inquire if this is intended to be (a) indefinite and (b) apply to all articles. Both seem to me to be rather harsh, and probably out of line with other arbcomm decisions. William M. Connolley 22:08, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (A) Indefinite or until we say otherwise, and (B) yes, all articles. Raul654 22:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, thanks for the clarification. William M. Connolley 22:40, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The RR limit
Talk:GFTP

message: Someone more familiar with Cygwin & apps should comment on running gFTP under windows.  I originally posted CyGNOME, including gFTP 2.0.14.  There was a comment that It appears the gFTP port for Windows never went anywhere; the Cygnome site was last updated in 2004 and has nothing about gFTP now.  The comment is partially correct--CyGNOME is no longer in development.  But there IS a gFTP port on the sourceforge project page for download.  I replaced the link to CyGNOME-2, including gFTP 2.0.16.  CyGNOME-2 is also no longer in development.  The GNOME libraries now ship with Cygwin, but I don't know if gFTP is part of it & don't know the preferred way to run gFTP under win32. -- Karnesky 22:10, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  gFTP on cygwin 

message: are you sure?
--83.190.205.33 04:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: see the note, above, and the article text re. Cygwin. --Karnesky 05:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: windows?

message: An anonymous user has twice made changes, claiming that the project is inactive.  There were changes to the SVN trunk just two days ago , so this not only constitutes WP:OR, but is just plain wrong. --Karnesky 06:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I admit I was mistaken about what you added the second time.  However, I fail to see why this belongs in the article.  It still reads with bias to me & still hints at stagnation.  A LOT of apps go more than two years between releases.  gFTP, like many apps, has not had a release schedule (so that no plans on alpha/beta releases is a red herring).  Since there have been no reliable secondary sources which have commented on stagnancy, I do still think this is OR--you're cherry-picking first-hand data to imply a conclusion which you independently arrived at. --Karnesky 17:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project status 

message: If you use this application you can add this userbox to your userpage:
- Ahunt (talk) 11:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox
Talk:Dark Riders (comics)

message: I kept seeing the broken links article, so I started this stub. I don't have time to complete it myself, at the moment. So, that's why I left the link. You can use it as long as you don't get into the plagiarism problem. - -- LEC20 22:14, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Started
Talk:Jack Orion

message: Is this traditional, as stated? I thought Jansch composed it. Bluewave 10:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, sorry! It says traditional on the record and Colin Harper describes it is a "wildly impressionistic" version of a song that Jansch learnt from Owen Hand. Bluewave 14:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Gardener

message: Jack Orion, the song, is undoubtably (no sourcing required) a version of the Child ballad Glasgerion. I’ll fix the link in a moment, and provide a back-link from that article. But where did it come from more immediately? I have a vague recollection that Bert Lloyd meddled [in the best possible way!] with the words and gave it that tune. But I don’t remember where I read or heard that. Does this ring any bells for anybody: with sources attached? —Ian Spackman 23:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Colin Harper says "Jack Orion itself was the vestige of a traditional melody, reconstructed by Bert Lloyd..." so I think you're right. I suppose he might have learnt it from Lloyd directly, or it might have been the result of one of his collaborations with Anne Briggs, who was  well-steeped in the lloyd repertoire.Bluewave 14:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glasgerion 

message: Rather strangely one of the instrumental tracks (I’m fairly sure it was The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face) was used as the theme tune for a sort of local news/magazine programme which followed the BBC’s six o’clock TV news in Swindon and the West Country. (Might have been called Points West, or might have been a successor to that programme). Even if I could source and confirm that I wouldn’t bother adding it to the article because like most trivia it’s too trivial to be in a Wikipedia article. But I couldn’t resist plonking the factoid here. Must have been a little money-spinner. —Ian Spackman 23:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: "The First Time…" sure doesn't sound like Ewan MacColl's song; but on the sleeve and label I have here it is credited to Ewan MacColl.  Are such publisher errors common? —Tamfang (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The First Time Ever I Misattributed a Tune
Talk:Brotherhood of St Laurence

message: This seems (still), to be a blatant advertorial for the BSL; an organisation that has been surrounded by controversy over the last twenty years, particularly about its real-estate ethics in Melbourne. Can I get a hand in fixing the article to get a more balanced view. (I'm not a fan of the BSL, so I want someone impartial to run their eye over it). 203.219.193.12 (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely true that the page is written as advertorial content. I've at least slapped a  tag up at the top as a start. Though I hate tagging and leaving, I may have to leave it at that for now since I've not found any good summary references describing the controversies in an initial search. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 03:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Chaperonin

message: Added mentions of the various classes of chaperonins (Hsp60, 70, 90, 100, etc.) --chodges 22:53, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduce classes of chaperonins 

message: Link goes to "Chaperon" (engl.: chaperone), which isn't the same as a Chaperonin. Apparently there is no german version of the Chaperonin article. Link should be removed. --Clemens, 2 Feb. 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.178.186.124 (talk) 23:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link to german Wikipedia
Talk:GE U28C

message: Union Pacific U28C #2804 has been preserved at the National Transportation Museum in Kirkwood, Missouri. The unit had been used as a training aid for Union Pacific shop forces and was donated without its long hood. --SSW9389 22:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  UP 2804 

message: Phase I U28Cs include the first 28 built between February and July 1966 for Chicago Burlington & Quincy and Northern Pacific. Those units use the same carbody as the Phase III U25C and are 64' 4" long. The Phase I units have a 3500 gallon fuel tank. Phase II units built between May and November 1966 are 67' 3" long and have a 4000 gallon fuel tank. --SSW9389 19:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Phases
Talk:FalconSAT

message: appears to be in development http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/home/falconsat6_cadets.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpikas (talk • contribs) 01:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: FalconSat-6
Talk:Glans

message: *Don't you think this should be merged with Glans penis?  Nippoo
*No because females have them too...
*I think that only the common part to both sexes should be left. In particular, the picture needs only to be in glans penis, not in glans. :209.9.198.6 21:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Hello all. I've worked on this article to the point where I think it no longer rates as a stub. It still needs some work, and all suggestions and helpful edits are welcome. In particular, the article is in need of a few references. --Esseh 22:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrades 

message: OK, so it's the 1st of May. Whooopee! Better still, I think I have finally finished this article. Please, all of you who have contributed (and I'll look thorugh the discussion list and contact you directly), this article needs a few things, and then I want to submit it for review. What it needs is:
* a check for my omnipresent typos
* a check for clarity
* a check on categories (I think it needs more, but am unsure what to add).
Thanks, and if you don't want to respond here, write me on my talk page.  Esseh 05:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayday, mayday! 

message: I have just added a Biology project box, and changed the Sexuality box to reflect that this article needs attention. Rationale: I have greatly expanded and re-written this article, and it needs assessment for quality and importance from both projects. Thanks all Esseh 17:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessments 

message: Bollocks does it mean that.
:It does indeed. Check a dictionary. And this is for discussion of the article. Oh, and please sign your posts. Esseh 20:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acorn? 

message: Normally I am all about jerking the citation needed spam from articles. This would be an exception:
"This organ was once thought to serve no function other than sexual arousal, but research is beginning to prove otherwise."
I think this merits more than just a "citation needed". How about what research is suggesting other functions may have been... and the citation. Otherwise this whole stanza could be omitted. -- JSAtkinson 11:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed?!? 

message: The image used is not an image of a normal glans. No normal glans looks all wrinkled like that. Clearly this is a glans that has been badly keratinized due to circumcision. Can we please replace it with an image of a normal (undamaged) glans.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianbrettcooper (talk • contribs) 15:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  image?
Talk:Coalition Provisional Authority Program Review Board

message: Geo Swan,
When I have time to dig through the audit reports, I hope that the many statements referenced to the KPMG audit are better supported than the one that says "KPMG audit of the Development Fund for Iraq notes that of the minutes of the 43 Program Revew Board meetings they were able to review, only two were attended by the sole Iraqi member."
Your list included in the article brings this in to question, given that there are several Iraq ministry representatives listed.  Your statement says that there was an Iraqi presences only twice in 43 meetings, and then by the same person.  This is grossly false.  Without even reading the audit reports, I'm willing to bet that statement was not made.  KPMG is too competent a firm to make such a major error.  Do you wish to offer up a specific reference?
Businessdr 23:04, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me save you that work.  Go to this page, select Development Fund for Iraq—Appendix—Matters noted involving internal controls and other operations issues during the audit of the Fund for the period to 31 December 2003.  Turn to the last paragraph of page eight.  --  Geo Swan 01:38, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Currency Act

message: as the currency act of 1751 on this page is simply the original document, should it be moved to wikisource with a summarization on this page? Or is this act not important enough to go onto wikisource? BadCRC 02:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how to go about starting something on Wikisource, but I've nevertheless "been bold" and have removed the extract.  Silverhelm 08:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  move 1751 to wikisource? 

message: At the top of the article is stated:
::"Some, such as Benjamin Franklin and Peter Cooper, believed this to be the least primary cause of the Revolutionary War."
Then it clearly states at the bottom that both these men thought it to be main reason. From what I know the bottom is true, so I removed the word 'least'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.231.113.161 (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Contradiction in wording
Talk:Idiyappam

message: Idiyappam is a kind of Appam - merging it will help flesh out the larger article. Zipzipzip 07:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Appam Merge

message: Who calls this string hoppers, I would like to know the reference or evidence of that please 111.92.126.152 (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  String Hoppers ?
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 1, 2005

message: A disambiguation link in this article to "Native American" needs to be fixed. Can someone with authority to unprotect this article please handle this. Thanks. BD2412 T 23:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Please replace the swastika in this article by :Image:HinduSwastika.svg. Thank you.
: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 00:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swastika
Talk:Centre Party (Sweden)

message: The party is not known to support small farmers. Only big farmers so to speak. So the Agrarian label seems a bit misguided. Here is the definition of Agrarianism. 
"Agrarianism is a political and social philosophy that has promoted subsistence agriculture, smallholdings, egalitarianism, with agrarian political parties normally supporting the rights and sustainability of small farmers and poor peasants against the wealthy in society."
--Mats33 (talk) 23:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agrarian?  

message: I've noticed that there has been a dispute whether which ideologies should stay in the infobox. Looking at "agrarianism", I'd prefer if we remove it considering that third-party sources do not label the party as agrarian anymore. I couldn't find any past-2006 sources that define the party as agrarian. The claim "green liberalism" seems to be only used by the party, the second source states that "the party does does not advocate a single ideology but has elements of both liberalism, green ideology and conservatism", while I could not reach the third source. I'd prefer if we only keep "liberalism", considering that this has been the ideology that most reliable third-party sources had used to describe the party as (1, 2, 3). Another option would be to keep "liberalism", "social liberalism", and "economic liberalism" (source for economic liberalism). Vacant0 (talk) 18:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree with , many articles list some major historical ideologies (like Jobbik) Braganza (talk) 20:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on having "liberalism", while removing "social liberalism" and "economic liberalism", that are sub-sets of liberalism. I have no reservations on keeping "agrarianism". --Checco (talk) 06:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll implement this edit. If anyone is objected to it, please comment here. Vacant0 (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

text: I'll have to remove green liberalism considering that this is a self-descriptor, although I also think that only retaining liberalism would be more balanced and correct, since the party is both socially and economically liberal. Vacant0 (talk) 13:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

text: they are not really a social liberal party but very economically liberal Braganza (talk) 08:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Centerpartiets nya partiledare, Muharrem Demirok, sa idag i DN att han vill tvätta bort nyliberalismen från Centerpartiet. Därmed tycker jag att vi kan ta bort mitten höger och Centre-right, och bara ha center/mitten 37.247.3.22 (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: too early Braganza (talk) 20:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position 

message: Given how well sourced social liberalism and green liberalism are in the ideology section, wouldn't it make sense to include them in the infobox? I know the Centre Party have undergone a fairly noticeable ideology shift over the last few years, is that why my edits about this have been reversed? Maxine McKeown (talk) 23:19, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideology List
Talk:Green Party (Sweden)

message: It is a bit WP:RECENT but there could be some mention of the recent controversies that among other things led to the resignation of Mehmet Kaplan. However, any text on that must mention all the events that have been covered in the news.  Sjö (talk) 06:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I think a brief mention should be added, with a focus on the resignation of minister Mehmet Kaplan, as that is a known, determined and significant consequence. Best regards. /EriFr (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I trimmed the description of the controversies so as to not put undue weight on the incidents. I also removed islamism from the infobox, there is no evidence that this is an official or unofficial ideology for the party. Anyone that want to readd it needs to supply reliable sources that say that islamism is a Green party ideology. Sjö (talk) 11:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I support your edits. /EriFr (talk) 11:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that the list has been restored and several more people added. Also the header says "islamist" which I don't think follows WP:BLP. Sjö (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 2016 controversies 

message: Being the most disliked political party in Sweden is what makes them notable. Updated to reflect that and added multiple reliable sources and direct quotes from those sources. 
2A00:1EB8:C19F:B1FB:E1C4:BF9A:19F9:67AD (talk) 17:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden's most disliked political party
Talk:Sundaland heath forests

message: "It is known as 'Kerangas' because the soil in the heath forest is lacking in nutrients."
In what language? The statement might be 'bollokkas' if it lacks verifiabilitudiness...
:My lecturers told us that the word Kerangas came from the iban, which means stingy. The iban applies this word to a piece of land that cannot be used to farm rice paddy. I don't know if this is the actual meaning since I'm not an iban and I asked one of my friend who is in fact iban and heard no such word. But there are many ibans living in different parts of Borneo, so it could be coing from either of them.Gross 12:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the meaning of Kerangas from this website. It means land where paddy cannot be grown. So stingy is not the actual meaning.Gross 12:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: