lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Daniel Odier

message: I don't understand how the guy who wrote the book that became the movie "Diva" can't be considered notable. The movie is quite famous. It appears the fellow is a reasonably famous author -- a number of his books seem to be available through purchase through Amazon and similar outlets. Perhaps he is less famous in the US than in France but that doesn't seem like a reason to exclude him. --Pmetzger 00:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: It seems to me that this is pretty gratuitous and not NPOV. I would suggest it be deleted. If anyone has a more complete panel of views on his work, that would be more appropriate, but later on in the article. Fbunny (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  View of Anais Nin
Talk:David Berg

message: Who drew all the "comics" in his Mo Letters -- was it Berg himself?  If so, when and how did he learn to draw comics? Maikel (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comics

message: "depictions of Rodriguez (aka "Davidito") with adult caretakers " - this is not understandable by British audiences, what are 'caretakers' in this context? A 'caretaker' in Britain looks after the boiler room in a block of flats, whereas a 'carer' wipes a disabled person's nose. It doesn't sound as though Rodriguez was disabled?
92.4.41.189 (talk) 23:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Family 

message: The first part of this article is hagiographic. It describes Berg's life in a tone which is so laudatory that it becomes ridiculous. Is this the expected effect ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giordaano (talk • contribs) 21:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ridiculous

message: looking over the x family material, it appears to be mainly a survivor group without further looking at it.
i can't defend it, and it's hard to look at this article without using the sources derived from x family.
i suggest rewriting this gentlemans wiki page, using the voluminous other sources that mostly agree with the assertions here.
SkidMountTubularFrame (talk)
@SkidMountTubularFrame You're right that XFamily is a former Family members group, which definitely causes some issues with authenticity of the sources themselves. I do think, though, that if they are simply reproducing another published work or the text of the MO letters, then I think it's relatively okay to use, but another disinterested source would be better. XFamily, though, is an invaluable resource for information on Berg and the Family generally, even if its inherently biased against them. Perhaps a disclaimer somewhere on the page or in the references would be good to start with? --Jacquesparker0 (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  x family as a source 

message: Book: Heaven's Harlots - My Fifteen Years as a Sacred Prostitute in the Children of God Cult
by Miriam Williams
Eagle Book, William Morrow & Company, Inc.
Copyright 1998
ISBN 0-688-15504-9
297 Pages Vjwheeler1 (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Media not Listed 

message: Berg website gives a 404. 2001:8003:3020:1C00:AC9D:4675:80EF:23C8 (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Weirding Way

message: Weirding Way | Wyrding Way | Wyrd, fate.  The use of fate to predestine the outcome of things.  Apparently it has a strong norse root as to the philosophical aspects of dying in the vanguard to pass onto Valhalla.  Does anyone have more info on this aspect of this entry? Jachin 12:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Weirding Way
Talk:Slaughter Beach, Delaware

message: I would be more inclined to believe the story that Slaughter Beach was named after William Slaughter than the Horseshoe crab idea.  Slaughter is a not-unknown surname in Sussex, UK, (the surname is a lot more common in Sussex than anywhere else in the UK).  Indeed, I myself have the surname Slaughter, and all my ancestors with the surname Slaughter as far back as I can trace have lived in Sussex.
Slaffter (talk) 10:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Does not compute

message: Yes, but do we know a first use?! - David Gerard 12:38, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it! - David Gerard 13:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

text: The article asserted it was used from the 1950s (I changed it to 1960s). Are there any actual examples from the 1950s? - David Gerard 13:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely some treatment of HAL in 2001 is relevant? Or should this be in cognitive dissonance?82.211.95.178 11:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins

message: The citation needed tags should be replaced with one at the top of the section, as so many disrupt the flow of reading.
Junulo 21:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Needed

message: There is an episode of The Simpsons in which Homer goads a doll made by Lisa with illogical statements causing it to explode while repeating "Does not compute".  Or was it Homer that said the words?  It probably should be here as it is better known than many of the other examples.  There may be other episodes, too, where the phrase is used.  Anyone remember? Jubilee♫clipman 22:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it! Trilogy of Error from season 12, though I can't remember if Linguo actually says "Does not compute".  There is definately an episode in which Homer says that he wants to goad a computer into saying "Does not compute" and then explode, though, and one in which Marge argues with a robot that says "Does not compute" but then modifies it with "Well Ok it does compute a little".  I'll research these and get back.  The article does need alot of tidying, anyway, as tagged!Jubilee♫clipman 00:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpsons 

message: I know it is impossible to tell which came first, but this article appears to have been lifted word for word from WorldLingo. Thoughts? Jubilee♫clipman 01:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifted?
Talk:Ray Holmes

message: One man - two articles —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saga City (talk • contribs) 
:Done. --Delirium 12:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I found the accounts below. Not necessarily 'official' RAF but certainly through the RAF and the account is different in a number of ways, particularly about all aspects of the German crew's story. What do people think?
*https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/research/RAF-Historical-Society-Journals/Journal-29-Dr-Alfred-Price-on-Battle-of-Britain-Day.pdf
*http://bbm.org.uk/airmen/HolmesRT.htm
*http://blitzwalkers.blogspot.com/2010/09/battle-of-britain-day-buckingham-palace.html?m=1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinsnos (talk • contribs) 14:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Caution: 10 hours later, 79.68.150.165 got blocked for 1 month (for other reasons). Check work.... -A876 (talk) 00:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparent RAF account is different in a number of ways
Talk:Fannie Bloomfield Zeisler

message: This article was creates as part of WikiProject Missing articles Joaquin Murietta 13:18, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:!Action Pact!

message: Why was the album moved to Action Pact (album), to be replaced by some obscure band? Why not put that at "Action Pact (band)", or why not use the capitalized, punctuated spelling as given in the article? Adam Bishop 15:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Ayers Rock Airport

message: "The airport is more like an airstrip, with a minute amount of flights departing each day. None of the two major airlines in Australia (Qantas or Virgin Blue) travel to or from the airport. Rex is the biggest airline to operate from the airport." and "including a snowboarding session on Ayers Rock itself. These services operate daily except at beer o'clock." qantas.com.au says there are daily flights, but rex.com.au doesn't cover Ayers Rock. It seems somebody had a disappointing trip. --Scott Davis Talk 13:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text

message: I'm tempted to remove the stub-status of this article. Will hold off for consensus. Thadius856 23:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub-class? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Connellan Airport,. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 23#Connellan Airport, until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Connellan Airport," listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dan O'Bannon

message: Is Dan O'Bannon related to Rockne S. O'Bannon? -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 14:08, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockne

message: Timeline is screwed up. Was he homeless before or after Star Wars? Vytal (talk) 13:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: This section only briefly covers his death. Not a word about his personal life. --AVM (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life and death 

message: Although he will receive a screen credit (as he has in all of the Alien films), O'Bannon was not working on the new Alien prequel at the time of his death. That was just sloppy "reporting" from the EInsider.com website who probably just glanced at IMDB and made a quick assumption. O'Bannon has not worked on any of the Alien films except the first one, though he continues to receive a screen credit for creating the characters and title monster in all of them. The new prequel is being written by Jon Spaihts. 80.47.116.188 (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not working on Alien Prequel

message: Greetings Wikipedians! I found the discussion of his college years and early work to be sort of muddled in terms of chronology, so I've tried to remedy that. I did not check facts. This article needs more citations to reliable sources; I will see what I can find in the days ahead. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk)
::Done. BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 22:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Education, early work rewrite; needs citations
Talk:Beretta M1918

message: With a lack of Evidence the Weapon was deployed at the time of the war and on any front/even issued to any troops. i would mossion we remove WW1 from mention. atleast till we have a proper citation noting to us the weapons use in WW1.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrikerofLife (talk • contribs) 00:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  M1918 use Edit
Talk:Slide Mountain (Ulster County, New York)

message: In the "John Burroughs" section, I found something that is probably not NPOV. If we had this as a quote from someone, it would be fine.
"...that offers the best view from the mountain."
Smock42 (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure we could find a source saying something like that. I wrote the original article back when we didn't require sources to be cited so rigorously, and haven't had the time to really update it since. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV or not?
Wikipedia talk:POTD/March 2, 2005

message: where is the picture? I don't see anything here. Alensha 14:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the image in question, :Image:Eagle Nebula - NASA.jpg was subsequently found to be a copyright violation and has now been deleted. If memory serves, it was originaly uploaded under the impression that it was a NASA sourced image, however someone else noticed that it as actually an ESA image and only licensed under non-commercial use only. As non-commercial use images are now deprecated, it had to be put forward for deletion which happened around 18 July 2005. To avoid further confusion, I'll change the page to point to the original source. -- Solipsist 20:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the answer! Alensha 21:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Franky Gee

message: He died on the 21st, not to 22nd. Stop vandalizing this with false information. All sources say he died on the 21st, I can not find any information that says the 22nd.
I just looked it up. He died on Saturday, which was the 22nd. 
Here's an english source Reuters. All german sources I've checked list his death on the morning of the 22nd.
:The article says 'German media reported saturday', not that he died saturday.  However, I cannot find any articles that say definitely the date of his death so in the absence of something concrete I suggest we keep it on the 22nd.  Recent Deaths was updated sometime yesterday to the 22nd. --Syrthiss 12:08, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article you posted is dated the 22nd, yes, but it doesn't say that he died that day. 66.24.4.236 19:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Alright, I found a source.
http://frontpage.fok.nl/nieuws/58742 66.24.4.236 19:19, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page says he formed Captain Jack. The Captain Jack page says it preceded him. This page doesn't attribute the former claim. Which is accurate? Aresef (talk) 19:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Jack inconsistency
Talk:Jameel McCline

message: this okay as a source http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=008943—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.253.244.174 (talk • contribs) 23 Oct 2005.
:Good, I have put the sourse into the article.--JK the unwise 15:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:County of Nassau

message: What's the reason for the move from Nassau (state) to Nassau (duchy)? Nassau was first a county, then a principality, and finally a duchy -- we probably don't want to have a separate article on each of those periods, so Nassau (state) seems to me to work best. --Chl 15:06, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Nassau (state), which seems most neutral and logical. Plus, there are precedents. —Nightstallion (?) 13:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I believe countship is a better translation of the German Grafschaft than the commonly used county. In common usage, particularly in the United States, a county is a unit of local government subordinate to a state. As explained under County, regarding the translation of the French comté,
 whereas the word comté denoted a sovereign jurisdiction in the original French, the English county denotes a subdivision of a sovereign jurisdiction.
The same can be said for the German Grafschaft.
Countship carries the original idea of a sovereign territory ruled by a count, without any other modern connotations in the context of territories. See Wiktionary entry  I believe the word can also refer to an heriditary title itself, but this should not create any ambiguity in this context.
Any other opinions?
--Texas Whitt (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  County vs. Countship 

message: page 3 of Napoleons German Allies (2) by  Otto von Pivka et al, describes the territories that were lost and gained during this period. These details could be added to the article. --PBS (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confederation of the Rhine
Talk:Urusei Yatsura 2: Beautiful Dreamer

message: Um, I didn't think AnimEigo ever had the license to Beautiful Dreamer; I had understood that they tried to get it, but that US Manga Corps managed to grab it first. In the meantime, AnimEigo had translated it in anticipation of getting the license, so offered it to US Manga Corps. Or something. Does anyone know any specifics on this?
As far as I know, the licensing expiration was over the series not movies.--David Breakey 15:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licensing status 
Talk:St.-Pius-Gymnasium

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate (no consensus). The discussion can be found here. -Doc (?) 15:35, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for deletion debate
Talk:Pathfinder (1987 film)

message: Speedy deletion because this entrie is already exist (see "The Pathfinder") Melly42 15:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Which of the Sami languages was the film shot in?--Pharos 16:19, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: Pathfinder (2007) and The Pathfinder (1987) have nothing to do with each other.  Someone should fix this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.169.153.146 (talk) 
:I agree that comparing the 2 is insulting to Olefas, but it does appear to have, maybe "inspired" the 2007 film? Very unfortunate. Regarding fixing it, see below. --Quiddity 03:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um no. 

message: According to IMBD, the film's alternate (English) title is Pathfinder, no 'The'. I propose these films' articles be renamed to Pathfinder (1987 film) and Pathfinder (2007 film) respectively. --Quiddity 03:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title change?

message: I really liked this movie the two or maybe three times I saw it in the 1990s.
But I remember the English version being very murky about who the ethnic groups are, so it is basically good guys vs. bad guys.
So, does the English-subtitled version name the 2 groups?
What language are the bad guys speaking?
Varlaam (talk) 21:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2 ethnic groups
Talk:Agnostic

message: Main article: Agnosticism
Agnostic is a word coined by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1869. from Gk. agnostos "unknown, unknowable," from a- "not" + gnostos "(to be) known.
Agnosticism presumes that the essential nature of things are not and cannot be known. It is usually relates to religious doubt, but is also used in engineering and medicine to indicate that a device is not dependent on any particular technology or condition. See, for example:
* Fixed-mobile convergence 
*Agnostic alexia - words can be seen but cannot be read  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timpo (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested revision

message: Could the following text:
Category:Protected redirects
...please be replaced with the following text:
...so that the redirect is is put into the category via a tranclusion in an Rcat template rather than a category transclusion? Thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 06:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 12:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 19 September 2014 

message: I suggest adding these categories:

Attested by M-W, the CED, and the OED. —Ringbang (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:John Corrigan

message: Why is (as of Oct 22) the page tagged cleanup and some suggestions if someone wants to improve it:
# the article should start with a definition of the subject, i.e., John Doe is a religion scholar best known for his work on...
# the date after the name must be the date of birth, not the date of when the person got his PhD;
# two separate sections: one for life (where and when he got PhD, places he went, etc.) and one for work. The latter should tell the reader what are the important things he did, not just the titles of the book he wrote.
I could have done it by myself, but I think someone with some knowledge of the
topic would do that better. I'll be back and do the cleanup if no-one else does
it, however. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 15:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gallia Lugdunensis

message: I deleted the hazy and inaccurate "roughly encompassing the regions of Brittany, Normandy and the area around Lutetia Parisiorum (Paris) in what is now the modern country of France." Its inaccurate becuase it misses out a bbnch of territory that was in fact included, and it attempts to give some central role to Paris which is non-historical. --Nantonos 15:45, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate extents
Talk:Konsole

message: The third sentence of the article reads as follows: "The KDE applications Konqueror, Krusader, Kate, Konversation, Dolphin."
It is either lacking a verb, or if "applications" is meant to be the verb it is unknown to me, hence the sentence is incomprehensible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.230.139.174 (talk) 12:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible sentence 

message: The term needs a WP:RS which explains it.  Lacking that, the reader may be misled to believe that it shows a terminal with two (or more) viewports.  The picture appears to show something different: the ability to show more than one tab at a time. TEDickey (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  window split 

message: The source-code has numerous header comments saying GPL2 or later. TEDickey (talk) 21:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a webpage.  Read the source code, which is authoritative TEDickey (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

text: If you have a serious disagreement with the KDE developers regarding their license, you should point out that their comments fall short of your expectations TEDickey (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

text: It appears to be in every source file, at the top (104 files, excluding ".ui" and similar generated files).  If you read the source, you'll notice it.  By the way, your most recent edit introduces another error by suggesting that Konsole contains subprojects.  On the contrary, that is one (rather large) program.  TEDickey (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

text: Now, since the developers explicitly used or later, the comment at the end of GPLv2 applies to Konsole.  In some works (such as the Linux kernel), the developers chose to disallow "upgrading" to GPLv3.  Since the developers of Konsole chose to allow this, stating "GPLv2" by itself can mislead the reader.  For that reason, the GPL topic (unversioned) is often used in these topics. TEDickey (talk) 23:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

text: By the way, the links to COPYING, COPYING.DOC (besides not working as intended in the template) are not useful reliable sources for this topic, because it is the additional text provided by the developers in source-code (or perhaps a suitable readme file) that shows how they intend the boilerplate to apply to the program.  Konsole does have readme files, but they do not mention the license. TEDickey (talk) 13:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Konsole's licence 

message: As written, lacking a date, the topic suggests to the reader that the "VT102" emulation is not actually part of the main Konsole source (though it's been there since 2000).  The Internals note is largely irrelevant, since it provides no useful link to understand the editor's intention in discussing the pseudoterminal interface.  Whether the issue is 7 years old or 15, that detail is entirely lacking TEDickey (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Internals note
Talk:Howards End (film)

message: It's kind of confusing who is being referenced when. For example, are Margaret and Helen both Schlegels? It merely seems that way. In addition, the Basts are not really mentioned past the first paragraph.PhoenixSeraph 23:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that's been fixed now.  Gpjt 02:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Was the original runtime of the film 140 minutes or 142 minutes? Various American sources from 1992 give 140 minutes (e.g. ). The New York Times lists a running time of 145 minutes  - that must be an error.  British sources from 1992 give the precise time 142 minutes 15 seconds . DVD releases, even as early as 2005, were 142 minutes . I wonder if the 1992 US theatrical release was of a slightly shorter cut than the British release, or was the 140 figure erroneous from the beginning. In any event, I changed the runtime in the infobox from 140 to 142. Mathew5000 (talk) 04:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  running time