lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jeremy Spake

message: I was on the return flight from Moscow in 2000 with Jeremy, naturally he flew Business (I was also luckily there) and I had a chat. A totally nice guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.232.157 (talk • contribs) 07:21, September 9, 2006
Utterly irrelevant, unsigned2. Just like this article, which should either be rewritten or removed. Tomclarke (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it's rare to find a biographical page for a reasonably notable person to have no references at all. I can see there has been a lot of editing to this page over the years and yet nothing referenced. It almost make me think the page should be restarted somehow. But instead I'm going to try and find some actual verification. 16:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:George Farquhar

message: I have made some cosmetic changes to this article, including adding an info box and getting rid of some questionable items (such as the claim that The Twin Rivals has Farquhar's "most frequently quoted line, 'Necessity, the mother of invention'"; that line actually dates back before Farquhar, and according to this info on answers.com  it can be traced back to at least 1658 in its present form in English--assuming we do not go back to its non-English predecessors like the line from Persius quoted on this same page). Nevertheless, there is still a lot of work to be done and I haven't yet got the time to do it. Some sourcing of known facts would be a good start. --MollyTheCat (talk) 04:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now tried to "help" the article with an extensive revision of the biographical sketch of Farquhar, which I have sourced in great detail to remedy the deficiencies in sourcing previously. There is still room for improvement as some assessment of Farquhar and his critical reception should be attempted. I may come back with material for this, unless some abler hand contributes something first. Hope this revision will be found to better the article.--MollyTheCat (talk) 04:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs some help 

message: Can the author maybe reference the article like described in section 3.3.4 at WP:CITE or similar? Not to criticize, I mean no offence, but when the same books are used and every footnote has the same full book information that already has been given somewhere else then the references section becomes really clogged and confusing. Thanks, 76.10.141.216 (talk) 15:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing 

message: So his father was a clergyman with seven kids? Presumably Catholic, since we're in Ireland. This needs an explanation I think. Arbeit Sockenpuppe (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never heard of the Church of Ireland before? Ottava Rima (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: clergyman
Talk:Clockers (film)

message: this description does not do a good job of taking an objectional view Paskari 01:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PoV

message: Why is the plot here? I suggest we delete the whole section, or at least cut it down to a short paragraph that doesn't give everything away. If I have time, I might do it.Dean Sayers 11:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopedic does not mean blow-by-blow he did this, he did that, we see this, just then that. A plot summary *summarizes* the story to the essentials. This is one of the worst-written plot summaries I've seen on Wikipedia. Most are too long by at least half -- this is just trying to recount visuals instead of exposition. --Dhartung | Talk 02:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs to be fixed

message: Someone tagged this movie as having been shot in New Mexico. Is there any real fact behind this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.138.189.26 (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shot in [[New Mexico]]?

message: Uh, RT was founded in 1998; the film came out in 1995. It couldn't have "earned" a rating on RT at the time.
:RT could've viewed the film later. Not to mention they collect reviews from way back.--Filmomusico (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rated on [[Rotten Tomatoes]], but predates RT
Talk:Vegetotherapy

message: I've removed this because, so far as I know, this is not a recognized form of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. I stand to be corrected, of course, but I'd like to see confirmation from a mainstream psychoanalytic body. SlimVirgin (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is technically classed as psychoanalytic mostly because it is one of the second-generation therapies derived by Freud's students. It is certainly not mainstream psychoanalysis. Such naming is not rigorously defined. David spector (talk) 20:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Psychoanalytic

message: I've added a number of additional therapeutic details, to give a better flavor of how vegetotherapy works in practice, including intervention techniques, typical patient reactions, and criteria for improvement. When I get time, I intend to add references for each such addition. Anyone who wishes to verify them before then may consult the teaching notes for Orgonomists (Reichian psychotherapists). Copies are, of course, owned by all Reichian psychotherapists, and may also be available from the College of Orgonomy or in publications or journals. David spector (talk) 20:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional therapeutic details
Template talk:MNE

message: Likely to be changed to  in coming weeks. Please don't change it yet! doktorb wordsdeeds 12:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed -- soon, but not yet. —Nightstallion (?) 11:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why can't we just change it now?--Greasysteve13 07:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not official yet. doktorb wordsdeeds 08:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now.  —Nightstallion (?) 10:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Woo! I mean, not to get too excited about this but, woo! doktorb wordsdeeds 10:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn! I missed it.--Greasysteve13 10:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Onimusha 2: Samurai's Destiny

message: Just some minor things really but when using a hyphen to join two words the second word should not be capitalised unless it is a name.  Thus "Self-Proclaimed" is "Self-proclaimed", and likewise "Self-Deluded" is "Self-deluded".  Also handbag is an actual word so no hyphen is necessary. =] --Emperor Wu 12:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling/Grammar 

message: This page makes me want to cry. I'm deleting most of the superfluous data. There simply doesn't need to be this much detail on trivial items in the game. If you think otherwise please don't just restore it, write it in a fashion suitable to Wikipedia, currently this page is almost impossible to read and contains next to no actual information. Rehevkor 16:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloody hell. 

message: Gogandantess (talk) 04:42, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agh. This article sucks more than a vacuum cleaner.
Talk:Sheffield City Airport

message: You get more hits for SZD than for SZE and the first link in both searches leads to the official site. But SZE appears in the link to the orricial site. Anybody know which is the correct one? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: SZD is the correct code, it appears on the IATA website publication here. (page 59). Dbertman 12:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Strange the SZE link. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The source was Batty, Rail Centres: Sheffield, quoting from memory.  In the light of the evidence you provide it does seem a strange assertion, however it can be referenced!BaseTurnComplete (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IATA Code
Talk:Candie Payne

message: Is she English or American? I remember reading an article that was on the wall in the old Flying Picket that was about when Howie Payne grew up in New York?  Perhaps she was born there before moving to Liverpool, but it could be that she was actually born in Liverpool moved to New York and then returned Petepetepetepete 11:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: English
Talk:Bracken

message: As far as I remember the folk antidote to nettle stings was Dock (Rumex). Is this a memetic mutation? There are no references or citations given, and the rest of the article would seem to contraindicate any healthful benefit of having bracken juice on or in the body.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.255.112.250 (talk) 08:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bracken as stinging nettle antidote

message: I propose that these pages be merged - they cover the same topic at different levels of detail and completness. I am not fussed what the final article is called - the taxonomists can argue it out with the common name supporters but two articles is one too many for this specie Mrs Trellis 12:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Pteridium aquilinum into this page

message: Is this section really required here? The reference to Last of the Summer Wine seems very tenuous. And we don't refer to every word on Wikipedia that can be used as a name (e.g. Brown, Green, Hyacinth, Bell, etc, etc.)
(Thebensteads 13:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bracken in Popular Culture

message: *
*
* 
should be included as reviews on toxicology.--Stone (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This article seems to detail european bracken. We need more od a description of the other continents and islands. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 04:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Europe
Talk:Pârvu Mutul

message: "Mutul" is the proper form, and it was the man's nickname, not his family name. Dahn 12:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To the person making that idiotic redirect: I repeat what I have said above. Dahn 10:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ducati L-twin engine

message: The title is clumsy, but i wondered at long file names..
the intention is to do "DucatiVtwinsW" for the water cooled variants.
Does that make sense, or is there a better way?Seasalt 12:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2006

message: There's no reason to have a separate entry like this, since there is a discussion of the motorcycle designs in the Ducati entry.  This should be merged.Izaakb 21:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be merged into the Ducati entry 

message: I'm not sure how things stood during the 2006 discussion above, but currently there are separate articles on Ducati Corse racing history, and Ducati Singles, as well as many more individual articles for each bike.  So I think some of the racing details can go in the racing article, and the fine grained detail about each model can go to that model's page.  The remainder should fit in a fairly clear timeline, with a compact prose section to round it out.
All of which is easier said than done, I know.--Dbratland (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proseline Cleanup

message: This paragraph seems rather long, and is more about Ducati history than the bikes themselves.  I suggest it should be hived off onto a different page(new or existing) that deals with Ducati history. Arrivisto (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bevel drive paragraph
Talk:Donatus Magnus

message: The date of Donatus Magnus's birth should be reconsidered.  If he was born in 311, it was unlikely that he succeeded anybody as a leader or bishop in 313.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.229.106 (talk) 20:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:R160B (New York City Subway car)

message: This article lacks verifiable citations.  An anonymous train operator, allegedly posting on a railbuff message board, is not an acceptable citation.Raryel (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Utter absence of acceptable citations

message: there is r160 r train anytime i don't care what u say there is on it now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.8.187 (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is only there for put in, it isn't assigned to the R. We only put lines that the trains are assigned to, not necessary what they sometimes operate on. Just like how the R44 aren't assigned to the C but are operating on them right now. Also, stop being a ignorant.--208.120.142.8 (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This IP posted three similar comments on the R160A page.  On Wikipedia, we follow the datasheet that is linked at the bottom of every subway rolling stock article as our source for line assignments (we need a source).  Nothing is changed until the datasheet says that something changed. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 21:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But on the data sheet it does say r160 r train  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.8.187 (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't specify which datasheet, I see.  R160s are not assigned to the R, according to the JoeKorNer line assignment sheet and TA workers.  Just because they sometimes run on the R (which the Datta datasheet affirms) does not mean they are assigned to the line.  Hope this will help, Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 04:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  yes R160 R train 

message: I saw a 8953 on the r and i was suprised how it looked now i really think there is r160 on the r  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.8.187 (talk) 23:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  8953 on the r today
Talk:Seventh Avenue station (IND lines)

message: Discussion will soon appear at WT:NYCPT. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 06:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name discussion 

message: Can you move this page to Seventh Avenue (New York City Subway) as this station is also on the IND Sixth Avenue Line? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would, but unfortunately, there is also Seventh Avenue (BMT Brighton Line). Would Seventh Avenue (IND Lines) work? epicgenius (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess so.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page 
Talk:Ugrians

message: Even though this is just a stub, the content is mostly beside the point. The topic of the article, "Ugrians", is defined with one sentence; the rest is mostly general information on Finno-Ugric peoples and does not belong in this article. --AAikio 13:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the stuff on Finno-Ugrians, and put a link to that article in the "See also" section. --Zundark (talk) 10:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Alexander Kaidanovsky

message: I think the name is more correctly transliterated from Russian as "Kaydanovsky" (rus. Кайдановский).193.111.251.242 13:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lucille Bogan

message: There doesn't seem to be any evidence that Lucille Bogan was bisexual.  She sang one song about the gay subculture in Harlem, but that doesn't necessarily mean she participated.  See this article , which discusses several bisexual female performers.  Bogan is not grouped among them.  She may have been gay; I suspect there's simply a lack of information.  Given that, I think the categories labeling her as gay should be removed.  69.209.234.249 13:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be noted that any such reference has long since been removed. Thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been reverted to an earlier version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Text entered in   duplicated at least in part material from  and . Other content added by this contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ----Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem
Talk:Reason Party (Poland)

message: "Reason of the Polish Left" is the literal translation of the party's name, but utterly confusing to English speakers; "Reason Party" is slightly better, but such a loose translation that it borders on original research. We can't take an established English name from existing sources as the party is too insignificant to have received much media attention outside Poland; at the same time, we musn't establish a name in English ourselves. This raises the general question if the title of the article shouldn't be in Polish if no established English version is available. --Thorsten1 (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Polish world "racja" has a number of meanings, including one that is illustrated in the expression "racja stanu", "reasons of state."  Poland's Racja Polskiej Lewicy party, as its program is described in the article, clearly thinks itself the party of reason.  "Reason Party" seems the best English rendering of its name.  The party's Polish name, Racja Polskiej Lewicy, is uncommunicative to a non-Polish-speaker.  Nihil novi (talk) 11:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I've heard the phrase "racja stanu". But I've never heard Polish racja used in the sense of rozum. Reason Party would be Partia Rozumu in Polish, wouldn't it? Stilgar27 (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: An English rendering for this party's name is needed, as it is (and has been provided) for other Polish parties.  "Racja Polskiej Lewicy" is not translatable as "Rightness [or Correctness] of the Polish Left".  The only sensible English rendering is, I think, "Reason Party".  The Polish "racja" derives from the Latin "ratio", the root of the English "rationality" (in Polish, "racjonalność") or "reason".  Please see the Wiktionary entry for "reason".  Nihil novi (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Yeah, so there is a word play inovolved. Stilgar27 (talk) 10:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What's in a name

message: Shouldn't it rather mean "opposed NATO membership" as it's a ultra-left party? --212.186.7.98 (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supported or opposed NATO membership? 

message: Most of the article is in a MOS:SANDWICH between the demonstration image and infobox. Dialmayo (talk) 14:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Amban

message: List of Ambasa in Tibet
Is this list really necessary? I can find the "correct" spellings of the names, little by little, but I don't like the way the whole text is dominated by a list. Shall we delete it or move it to a box or something? --Niohe 13:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that the categories of "sovereignty" and "suzerainty" are very relevant to Qing China. I would suggest finding another wording ... "authority" might be the right choice.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 18:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Grade retention

message: The article says that in some locations, grade retention is only practiced from kindergarten through grade 12.  Is that not all schooling (with the exception of pre-K and post-secondary)?  Feel free to respond on my talk page.
Hallpriest9 02:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose.  "Repeater (student)" wouldn't make sense to an American or (I think) a Canadian.  Actually, that title makes me think of a student who voluntarily chooses to take a class that was successfully passed before (to brush up on your math skills as an adult, for example).  Furthermore, the article is more about the concept and the school policies, and less about individual students, so "Repeating (education)" might make more sense than "Repeater (student)".  Dekimasu's merge idea is okay with me.  I'd support a redirect for Nitsirk's proposed title.  WhatamIdoing 17:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The article cited (link) is old, from 1986, and is being used to bias a reader against retention policies by stating that research in the area of retention.  However, newer research is available that confirms the statements made in the article (i.e., studies have confirmed the information with respect to the detriment retention may have on students).  That research is well-summarized here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.231.169 (talk) 06:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old research being used to bias article for retention. 

message: Grade retentions are not urban myths. --174.92.79.163 (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an urban myth 

message: Dr. Andre has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Andre has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Pierre Andre, 2012. "KIs grade repetition one of the causes of early school dropout? Evidence from Senegalese primary schools," THEMA Working Papers 2012-47, THEMA (THeorie Economique, Modelisation et Applications), Universite de Cergy-Pontoise.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Andre's comment on this article 

message: -At the end of the opening paragraph...
Like, what the hell does it mean? 199.85.208.19 (talk) 20:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird sentence...
Talk:Guilford, Vermont

message: Hi. I think it's great to put current population numbers in the town pages but right now the standard is what was in the 2000 Federal census. So, if you'd like to include whatever measurement was used to get at the 2005 data for Guilford (a local census maybe?), please add that, but since there was no 2005 federal census, changing the census information to be a 2005 number doesn't quite make sense. Jessamyn (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: census

message: I checked the 2010 census data, and updated the main page. I don't know how to update that side infobar. 
https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-47.pdf
--KLoverde (talk) 19:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The sidebar is editable as well, it's all the stuff at the very top of the page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: census again