Talk:French aircraft carrier Arromanches

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating 

message: I have put this article On Hold for a few reasons.
#The first is quite simple-it is still under construction. I would personally wait until the article was fully constructed before putting it up for GA.
#:
#Secondly, I think that the lead could probably be expanded.
#:Where and how could I do this?
#Finally, this is not necessary, but I think that having a few more different references would help.
#: Hard to find though...
Fix these, and it will be passed in an instant. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a lineReview Me! 03:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead is the introduction to the article. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a lineReview Me! 01:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dreamy, for #2, the lead summarizes the article, and I feel this lead doesn't give a summary of everything in this article. Make it concise, but make it comprehensive. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Additionally, there are a far number of extremely short paragraphs, and the article has very little prose - I personally would fail this, but GA standards vary, and Redmarkviolinist can pass it if he wants. It can be argued that this meets the criteria. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, he is right. I am going to decide on this one depending on the quality of the work done on it. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a lineReview Me! 03:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dreamafter (talk) 21:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no it isn't. And as Skinny87 pointed out on my talk page, this article has been on the GAN list for over a month. All the paragraphs are extremely short, as is the prose, and the references could be formatted correctly and there could definately be more of them. If you have any further questions, post them on my talk page. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a lineReview Me! 16:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA-On Hold

message: Admittedly, I don't have any sources, but I think it is highly unlikely that the ship should have received the outdated 3-pdr in 1945. Perhaps the main authors could double-check? Regards --84.177.22.11 (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AA armament 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on French aircraft carrier Arromanches (R95). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060708225128/http://frenchnavy.free.fr:80/ships/aircraft-carrier/arromanches/arromanches.htm to http://frenchnavy.free.fr/ships/aircraft-carrier/arromanches/arromanches.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060708225128/http://frenchnavy.free.fr:80/ships/aircraft-carrier/arromanches/arromanches.htm to http://frenchnavy.free.fr/ships/aircraft-carrier/arromanches/arromanches.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified