lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Republic RC-3 Seabee

message: Please don't delete the "Military Designation Sequence". It's part of the Wikipedia format, and shows where the RC-3 fell with regard to other AAF OA- series aircraft.- Ken Keisel 6-15-08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ken keisel (talk • contribs) 18:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Designation Sequence

message: The military designation sequence text was removed from this article because it is duplicated in the Template:USAAF observation aircraft, therefore it is not needed. Under Wikiproject Aircraft guidelines these text sequences have been replaced by nav boxes. - Ahunt (talk) 19:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Designation sequence

message: The Seabee is a really unique (some would say 'weird') looking plane. Given its odd looks, it'd be nice if the article could delve into the thought process behind it and/or the reasons that it is shaped the way it is. It mentions in a few sentences how it looks, but doesn't explain what the intent of this design was. I imagine a good chunk of visitors are coming to this page to try and find out why it looks the way it does.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:BB01:7427:24DF:672C:91FC:6EC1 (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding that information requires finding a reference that explains it, as per WP:V. I have never seen one, but if you have a ref that explains it it can certainly be added. - Ahunt (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does it look the way it does? 
Talk:Les Humphries Singers

message: This is barely intelligable.ProfessorPlumNY 01:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed - as good as I could.  babelfish.altavista.com can only get you so far with a translation :> KleenupKrew 02:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found photos and uploaded them to Wikimedia Commons, however, I don't know anything about this band. I created an infobox, and put the photo into it, but don't honestly understand the text..  really it needs copyediting!  --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed 
Wikipedia talk:Evaluating how interesting an integer's mathematical property is

message: This is a very interesting essay and I would like to thank the author of it. There is a huge discussion in the greek version of WP about numbers and this essay was cited (here and here). I was wondering though, if there is an automated way to check specific numbers through the Questionnaire. Τζερόνυμο (talk) 07:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  automated way to run the questionnaire
Talk:Incident management (ITSM)

message: Split this out as part of ongoing efforts to slim down and modularize ITIL article and decouple the process areas to some degree from ITIL per se, as ITIL did not invent them - it is just the best known, most current framework describing them. Charles T. Betz 01:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi Charles, looking through this i'm not sure if this came directly from the ITIL page, in this context on it's own it reads very much as a HOWTO rather than as a descriptive article.   Mark G 10:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not change much of anything except perhaps the intro para. The rest of it is straight from the ITIL article. Agreed it needs work; I avoided doing a lot of content work as part of the splitting. Charles T. Betz 19:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  R U comfortable if I take a bash at it over the next week or so.... Mark G 12:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course! I think you understand my objectives, to give ITIL credit where due but also identify non-ITIL contributions to the subject matter.Charles T. Betz 13:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  objective vs howto 

message: Is an "incident" a "ticket" or not? --Alien4 (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are we talking about? 

message: I have a good article on this topic: Incident management (ITSM)
As my website is new I'm not putting the link directly in the main article. I'd request other editors to improve this Wikipedia article with help of the article link given below:
Incident Management in ITIL
If you found the above article helpful, then please put the link in the main article as external link.
--AyanBrahmachary (talk) 10:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link to Incident management (ITSM)
Talk:Khoa

message: Khoya - Methods and Alternatives <- this external link is dead  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.205.128.72 (talk) 18:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated link 

message: I did a search on "mawa" here (on Wikipedia) but nothing matched the condensed milk product I was looking for.  Then I googled and found a site which equated "mawa" to "khoa," which got me to this page.
So, shouldn't "mawa" be included on this page?
The link that sent me searching is this:  mawa cake  Zlama (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mawa 

message: Sooperchef.pk is a pakistani food company  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.36.217.238 (talk) 11:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sooperchef 
Talk:Kelly Stables

message: Indeed.  The age they give her at IMDB has been corrected.  If she graduated from high school in 1996, then you are right.  It is extremely unlikely that a 12 year old could graduate high school and earn a bachelor's at the University of Missouri just three years later.  My big question is; does anybody have a good photo of her?  I could probably ask her for one if it became absolutely necessary, but I'm reluctant to do so.  Her and I are acquainted on MySpace, but not actually "friends" yet.
--The Bulldozer (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good points

message: Shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere in the article that she is only 3 feet 7 inches tall? --Captain Infinity (talk) 21:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually IMDB states shes exactly 5 feet  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.3.250 (talk) 06:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 
Talk:Vincent Clemmons

message: To keep from having problems with what his last name is from arising, it needs to be clarified that Van is Vincent's father's first name, not part of his last name.  There has been no indication that this is not true on the show, as his father is usually reffered to as just Clemmons and not Van Clemmons which indicates to me that Van is his father's name and not part of the last name.  So Vincent is just Vincent Clemmons, not Vincent van Clemmons. - HuskersRule 02:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  His last name
Talk:Access code

message: Although I haven't had time to find refs, it is clear to me (from my work in the IT industry) that there are two major types of access codes described here: secure and non-secure. (I actually wondered whether the non-secure ones even belonged here, as the lead is all about security, but the (current) refs mention them so they are valid. The problem was the way the lead was written. I have been bold and re-organised the sections accordingly. (Looking at the short list of what links here I doubt if any links are to sections, but if they are they will land on the article anyway and it is not large enough (yet) that the reader will get lost.) Can someone please cleanup lead, etc, and add refs. Thanks. Bricaniwi (talk) 15:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New / renamed sections 

message: I replaced the contents of this page with a disambiguation page. I don't think the topic meets WP:GNG. --Pnm (talk) 03:27, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to disambiguation
Talk:Legends of Might and Magic

message: For all parties involved, it is necessary to recognize that wikipedia is not established as a medium for settling disputes. Even if validity or fairness of the LoMM Tournaments are in question by some factions, vandalism and outright deletion of content is not the appropriate course of action.Wrong gray (talk) 23:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism of the LoMM Tournaments category.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Crzrussian

message: 1. Newpages / Recentchanges patrol is messy business with less than 100% accuracy and some unavoidable ruffling of feathers. I apologize for any offense caused by this one of my ~1,000 deleted edits. 
2. I tagged the new article for deletion because it plainly failed to assert notability, and walked away from it. I did not research the subject, because the judgment I made was purely procedural, in other words, the article was defective on its face. At some point further on, I was looking at the deletion log for an unrelated reason and noticed that Elizabeth Macarthur went blue. Realizing that someone was about to contest this deletion, I did not add  to the recreated article, instead preferring to leave a discreet note for RBCF specifically to give the recreator time to establish hangon a rationale. RBCF proceeded to validate my choice by declining G4!  What I showed was not "a lack of understanding of how to manage disputed speedy deletions", but extra sensitivity to CSD victims. Also consider the message I left on the original creator's talk page: . 
These diffs and explanations should be enough to fully vindicate my actions. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Elizabeth Macarthur
Talk:Superb lyrebird

message: Sorry, the image can not be used as the licence says explicitly: to illustrate an article discussing the book in question, this article discusses a bird, not the book and as such it is not allowed. If it is left on, it is a copyright violation, and can be and should be removed.-- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Superb lyrbird in scrub.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 23, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-10-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 01:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Superb lyrbird in scrub.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The sub-text for the Superb Lyrebird in the section Passerine describes it as a "primitive" bird. In what sense is it primitive? Certainly it is "ancient"; is this the same thing?
Old_Wombat (talk) 09:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Primitive" bird?
Talk:XLink Kai

message: I am not really a gamer, so perhaps this is obvious, but I could not tell from this entry, or the Kai website, why someone would benefit from using this type of application. I thought most gaming consoles these days come with internet WAN connectivity native, with free options to connect to friends or gaming networks. So is Kai faster? More cross-platform? Works with more games? Does it get around some sort of pay-to-play restrictions on game networks? I came across Kai because it is mentioned as one of the primary features of the DD-WRT wireless firmware, some info on that (and why other wireless firmwares do not support it, if they don't) would be helpful. Jkraybill 18:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefits? 

message: What is XLink Kai's licence?
-83.151.195.33 (talk) 00:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licence? 

message: I can vouch for this being notable.  Xbox Live is a huge and popular service, the Xbox is a popular console, the Xbox 360 is a popular console, and the xlink kai service emulated the entire thing very early in the history of the xbox platform.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.74.112 (talk) 21:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That isn't how notability is determined on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Notability. --Silver Edge (talk) 10:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The first source you cite doesn't help because XLink Kai is only mentioned in the comments not in the main article. However the other sources you cite are sufficient to establish notability; so I am going to remove the notability banner. However, the other banners remain because you need to cite sources for the material in the article. Rusty Cashman (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 
Talk:Belfast, New York

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roy Haynes

message: The news about his behavior at the Jan 19, 2008 Bakersfield concert has been floating around, but how can this included in the article? These are the only sources I could find
http://www.bakotopia.com/home/Blog/ACEYOU/20092  http://thesoulandthesystem.blogspot.com/2008/01/open-letter-to-jazz-legend.html http://www.drumsmylife.com/-vp103126.html  http://people.bakersfield.com/home/Blog/talkofthetown/20002 76.195.77.174 (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is woefully inadequate. Nothing happened between 1958 and 2006? If you listen to other jazz musicians talk about Haynes it is with a tone of reverence and awe at his abilities, his energies, and his artistry.  72.76.184.128 (talk) 16:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woeful
Talk:Standard VIE Settings

message: It could be argued that this should be incorporated into the greater SubSpace article. The game's original physics, statistics, and damage rules needn't be married to SubSpace, though, or even to the genres of multiplayer or combat games. Taking that into account, it's likely that these rules will in some form long outlast the game itself. Perhaps not, but please give the article a moment to reach maturity before merging it. --einexile 02:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Marian P. Opala

message: I have re-added the "Photo Request" tag to this article, because the photo previously in this article was removed for lack of source information. --TommyBoy 20:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Request 

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reassessed
Talk:Justin Hayward

message: Can we get a better picture for this article, it's awfully dark. Milonica 04:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we get a better picture

message: Is his full name Justin David Hayward or David Justin Hayward? Sources differ.
John W. Kennedy (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He says himself here: "I was baptised Justin David Hayward and remained so ever since." However, his record at FreeBMD here suggests that his name was registered as David Justin Hayward. FreeBMD is not regarded as WP:RS. But it is corroborated by his Companies House entry here.Martinevans123 (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: There have been some unusual edits to Justin Hayward over the last few months and I don't know where to start with regards to cleaning any of it up. There has been blanking of referenced material and addition of lots of badly written non-referenced text. Del♉sion23 (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed a block of unreferenced blogese from the lede, added by a user account seemingly set up to add to this article. Acabashi (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced content  - December 2013

message: Not sure why this song is listed as a Hayward "composition" when it was written by Vigrass and Osborne. Pete3194 (talk) 13:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forever Autumn
Talk:Société de Transport de l'Outaouais

message: Transport should be transport in conformity with (consistincy or French usage).
* Réseau de transport de la Capitale
* Réseau de transport de Longueuil
* Société de transport de Laval (STL)
* Société de transport de Montréal (STM) 
Peter Horn 02:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is English Wikipedia. Ardenn 02:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:James B. A. Robertson

message: Anything else need to be done to this to get is GA approved? I'm a little worried about the lack of citations despite the references at the bottom.--NMajdan•talk 21:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article 

message: You say 'Many Democratic leaders were impeached, among them Lieutenant Governor Martin E. Trapp.' The Wiki article on Trapp says that he resigned as Lieutenant Governor only because his Governor John C. Walton had been impeached. There is no mention of Trapp being impeached. So one article or the other needs amending. Valetude (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impeachment 
Talk:Robert L. Williams

message: *Slightly better picture from the Library of Congress. Aboutmovies (talk) 15:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Robert Lee Williams was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 03:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Johnston Murray

message: This article meets the requirements for class C and mid importance for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 15:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reassessment
Talk:PAH world hypothesis

message: Strong delete. I am the editor responsible for this notice. I work in origin of life research and the theory is simply implausible. I realize this may not be sufficient for deletion, but judging by its lack of publication in a peer-reviewed journal, I think it either constitutes original research or is just too out-there to keep around. The thermodynamics aren't very plausible and the theory (e.g., http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309094321/html/221.html this book chapter). The proponent has not articulated a significant argument anywhere in the open literature as to the theory (a "PAH world" query on google scholar or scifinder returns no relevant results). At best, this entry should be marked with strong, strong warnings as to the fact that it is regarded as a fringe theory. However, I feel the lack of any documentation aside from a book chapter (note that it is from a very close colleague and collaborator - do not mistake this for a scientific publication) merits deletion. Sorry if I haven't obeyed any of the arcane wiki rules, I'm just a casual user! 24.181.29.106
:I'm looking into this to see if there is new information - so am resetting the time. Codec 13:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD: 6 June 2006

message: Has anybody looked at PAHs as the precursor molecules to chlorophyll and the heme group.  These are important molecules in electron transfer in living processes and in both photosynthesis and respiration.  I would have thought that they would have a mention here as porophyns are PAH derived.
John D. Croft (talk) 21:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chlorophyll/Heme
Talk:Johnny Grande

message: I am starting off the talk page for the recently deceased Johnny Grande. Capitalistroadster 02:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Johnny was on all the Original Comets tours from 1989 to March 2006. 23skidoo 17:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've seen in a couple of places that he was supposedly inducted into the Rockabilly Hall of Fame in 1997.  Can anyone confirm this?  Thanks.  Roaming27 23:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks skidoo.  Roaming27 00:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockabilly Hall of Fame
Talk:Christopher Jones

message: Are these three articles referring to the same person?
* Chris Jones (ValvT),creator  of the HVOF coating department at the worlds largest ball valve manufacturer.  Hard face and robotic automation genius. 
* Chris Jones (Obsidian Entertainment), founder of Obsidian Entertainment, a computer game company
* Chris Jones (AGS), creator of the freeware adventure game creation tool AGS
::The third one is definitely different from the last two --Amaccormack (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: same person?
Talk:Special rights/Archive 1

message: Is heterosexual marriage a "special right" by the definition currently in the article? ("laws that enumerate rights related to sexual orientation (e.g. prohibitions of discrimination based on sexual orientation, same sex marriage, etc.)")  Why would only same sex marriage be a "special right" but opposite sex marriage not be a "special right"?--Bhuck 12:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bhuck, I imagine that it because it is used as a term to discuss a change from current laws. Heterosexual marriage has been with us at least throughout the Judeo-Christian timeline and possibly longer. (See Genesis 2:24 and Genesis 34:9) Modern western law, as you may be aware, has a good deal of its roots in Judeo-Christian law. DavidBailey 20:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely you are not arguing that there is nothing "special" about heterosexual marriage?  Particularly people who refer to the traditions and interpretations of Judeo-Christian law which you are citing are prone to use the term "sanctity of marriage"--I would infer from that term that they believe marriage to be a very special right.--Bhuck 08:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all. I am saying you are confusing the dictionary definition with the reason for the article. Simply because Judeo-Christian law/tradition specify the sanctity of marriage does not mean that that also makes heterosexual marriage a candidate for inclusion in the article as a "special right". After all the article starts off with '"Special rights" is a political term used primarily by social conservatives in the United States...' What does inclusion of heterosexual marriage mean in this context? DavidBailey 14:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, I don't think heterosexual marriage should be included in this context.  But we need to explain why the social conservatives use the term for laws that enumerate rights related to some sexual orientations, but not rights related to other sexual orientations.  Do you see the problem in the phrasing here?--Bhuck 12:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, well, since this is a political term used by social conservatives, I think the article should reflect that use. If you want to add a different definition, I think that ought to be under a separate heading. IE- "Opposing view". DavidBailey 13:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

text: No, that's not what I want to do.  I don't think marriage is a "special right" in the sense in which conservatives use the term.  I just think that needs to be explained in the article.  I will try to find an edit to make which better reflects that--I don't think there exists a different definition or "opposing view" in that regard.--Bhuck 08:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "rights related to sexual orientation" 

message: I added this section with a link to Affirmative action, because I believe that some of the views underlying the debate are influenced strongly by that concept. I hope it adds something to the article. --163.1.136.97 03:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also