Talk:Giant panda

message: The redirect Pandas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Bonoahx (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pandas]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: change intermission to intromission in the Reproduction and Parenting section. 142.113.214.19 (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. "intermission" does not appear at all in the article that I can find. In which sentence do you see it? Cannolis (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2023 

message: 3 subspecies are listed, but I can find no reference anywhere to "a.m.hastorni".
Unless someone can point to a valid reference, it should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.30.52 (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like that was added by  with this edit. It's been over five years, but perhaps they can recall where that information was from? —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 15:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea. I probably just copied it from Spanish Wikipedia. The subspecies is listed there too. I am not opposed to its removal. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Looking at es-wiki,  added the subspecies to the infobox with this edit, but I don't see A.m. hastorni) in the text before or after that addition. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to remove it at this point. es-wiki had a page [for Ailuropoda melanoleuca hastorni that's been deleted three times as vandalism. On en-wiki, this 2017 edit to Ailuropoda removed the mention of A.m. hastorni due to a lack of any sources that didn't seem to trace back to Wikipedia. That same edit shows that the common name being given for that subspecies was "Eastern panda," which doesn't help. zh-wiki gives 云南大熊猫 as the common name, which was added with this edit. That translates to Yunnan giant panda, but the only mentions to a Yunnan panda are connected to a 2015 poaching instance. While that incident showed the pandas to be present in an area where they were previously thought to have been wiped out, there's no indication that they are or were a different subspecies. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe they should be removed from the other Wikipedias as well. If it's a legit subspecies, someone should restore it eventually anyway. It's not like this kind of things are so obscure. It's likely a hoax. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I just ran through the full list of sister project articles from the sidebar. Most didn't list subspecies, a lot only had A. m. melanoleuca and A. m. qinlingensis. I removed A. m. hastorni from infoboxes in nine projects (I couldn't remove the tenth instance — zh-wiki, where the page is protected from me editing it). Hopefully the English-language edit comment (or a Google Translate version) will help avoid reverts... I could have missed one or two where the Latin name was rendered in local characters or where the subspeieces information was in a collapsed or otherwise inobvious place. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 18:53, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subspecies  

message: 172.127.157.33 (talk) 17:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. If you mean to note their conservation status as a vulnerable species, that is already covered in the article.  BelowTheSun  (T•C) 17:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2023 

message: Change US$1.5 billion to US $1.5 billion 172.127.157.33 (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: change it pls it makes no sense Skmdasdadasdk (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done: this is the correct format. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023 

message: change Predators. Although adult giant pandas have few natural predators other than humans, young cubs are vulnerable to attacks by snow leopards, yellow-throated martens, eagles, feral dogs, and the Asian black bear.  to Predators. Although adult giant pandas have few natural predators other than humans, young cubs are vulnerable to attacks by snow leopards, yellow-throated martens, eagles, feral dogs, and the Asian black bear. Sub-adults weighing up to 50 kg (110 lb) may be vulnerable to predation by leopards. Skmdasdadasdk (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. UtherSRG (talk) 17:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2023 

message: change giant panda
 to panda bear 172.127.157.33 (talk) 16:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. UtherSRG (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2023 

message: Hi, I have already tried editing the word "Ponya" to the correct term "Panja" multiple times, only to have it reverted by the editors. I am extremely sorry if I do not know how to properly cite the source. I want to do my best to get this information corrected as the word "ponya" does not exist in the Nepali language. The closest word is "Ponja", which is just an incorrect way of spelling "Panja". 
Panja refers to claws, palm or fang. The word "panja" is also used in the Hindi language. 
I do not know how to make the proper edit. If any editor is reading this, can you please edit the word "ponya" to "panja" and cite the source necessary?
Some sources are: 
https://dictionary.nepaliexpert.com/search/term/panjA
https://www.shabdkosh.com/search-dictionary?lc=hi&sl=en&tl=hi&e=%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%BE FateXBlood (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The source you provided is not reliable. Wolverine XI  (talk to me) 14:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

text: See Red panda#Etymology and respective reliable sources therein. BhagyaMani (talk) 14:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The closest word for Panda is the Nepali word "Panja" and not "Ponya". 

message: The below is to make the wording a little better and reduce run on
Change
“The shoot is an important energy source, as it contains starch and is 32% protein, hence pandas evolved the ability to effectively digest starch.”
To
“Pandas evolved the ability to effectively digest starch, making the shoot an important energy source. Though mostly starch, bamboo shoots are 32% protein, and therefore a good substitute for a carnivorous diet.”
Or something like that. LPantalons (talk) 15:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: UtherSRG (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a source for bamboo shoots being 32% protein? Seems more likely to be 3.2%. Derryp (talk) 22:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2024