Talk:Miami, Queensland/Archive 1

message: So now we have anonymous contributors determining the unimportance and low class of the article now. Is that the situation? --WikiCats 00:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia has always been open to contributions from anonymous editors. Assessments are a valid contribution. They're not set in stone however and can be disputed at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment/Disputes. This assessment has been listed there by User:Nathannoblet, and already has a reply. -- Longhair\talk 06:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

text: You're bringing your beef with assessments to the wrong place. This isn't the only WikiProject using WP1.0 style assessments. Many find them useful. If you don't like them, ignore them. I'm not interested in re-opening this debate. it's been had before at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment#What_is_the_purpose_of_these_Assessment_tags. -- Longhair\talk 09:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you could explain what use they serve. --WikiCats 09:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at the Miami, Queensland talk page I won't. This discussion isn't helping to improve the article on Miami in any way. In short though, I can now tell at a glance how many Featured Articles cover an Australian topic (prior one had to sort through a very large list), and how many Australia-related articles are of Good Article standard. Take this over to the WikiProject Australia Assessment talk page if you really want to flog this dead horse. There's only a handul of editors I'm aware of that oppose article assessments, and many many more in support. I guess you're not ready to learn about the bot software I have ready to tag (not assess) the remainder of Australia-related articles then? -- Longhair\talk 09:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The assessment 

message: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australia/Assessment#This_Assessment_process_is_a_monumental_waste_of_time --WikiCats 09:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: Magic Mountain info: The 5-acre Magic Mountain theme park at Nobby Beach was the most centrally located of the Gold Coast's major tourist attractions. In 1962, Page Newman built the Nobbys Beach chair-lift that later formed part of the Magic Mountain entertainment park. A cafeteria was built on top of the outcrop. It was a gamble that paid off. The chair-lift carried 40,000 people in its first year of operation. A Magic Castle was built, giving the park the "magic" theme. Intensive development commenced in 1983. $13.6M was spent to create the Magic Mountain theme park. Car parking was created onto and under the mountain. Attractions included a Parachute Tower, Wave Swinger rides and Magic Theatre. Magic Mountain closed in 1987 and the land was subdivided into two portions in 1993. The land was sold and is now the site of apartments, restaurants and shops. --WikiCats 11:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic Mountain 

message: News:  --WikiCats 13:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  $20 million Sale at Miami 

message: A case has been filed with the Mediation Cabal regarding this article. If you are a neutral party and interested in mediating, please review Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal and Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Suggestions for mediators before starting mediation, then feel free to dive in! If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks! ~Kylu (u|t)  20:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-13 Scott Davis and Miami,Queensland|Mediation Case]]