Talk:Cisco Catalyst 6500

message: You should take the 'We' stuff out.
Otherwise it is simply a cisco marketing slide.this is an encyclopedia
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.20.221.71 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Why is the title 'Catalyst 6500' and not 'Cisco Catalyst 6500'. The page for Cisco Catalyst 1900 uses 'Cisco'. There should be consistency. FordneyPachelbel (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved, as there has been no opposition since the proposed move. It adheres to the common name of the product and better aligns with other Cisco page names. (non-admin closure)  Hey man im josh (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Catalyst 6500 →  – I've seen both in use for this article subject (WP:COMMONNAME). Renaming would support WP:CONSISTENT, and renaming could make this a bit less ambiguous. The references in article all say "Cisco Catalyst 6500" in title. For some weight, Network Computing uses both "Cisco Catalyst 6800", "Catalyst 6800" and "Catalyst 6500" in context (usually only saying "Cisco" once). Additionally, the main English Wikipedia article is currently named Cisco Catalyst. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There was also a discussion in 2011 to move Catalyst (switch) → Cisco Catalyst. As a result, it was moved.Special:Permalink/425538443#Requested move 84.250.14.116 (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved, as there has been no opposition since the proposed move. It adheres to the common name of the product and better aligns with other Cisco page names. (non-admin closure)  Hey man im josh (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Catalyst 6500 →  – I've seen both in use for this article subject (WP:COMMONNAME). Renaming would support WP:CONSISTENT, and renaming could make this a bit less ambiguous. The references in article all say "Cisco Catalyst 6500" in title. For some weight, Network Computing uses both "Cisco Catalyst 6800", "Catalyst 6800" and "Catalyst 6500" in context (usually only saying "Cisco" once). Additionally, the main English Wikipedia article is currently named Cisco Catalyst. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There was also a discussion in 2011 to move Catalyst (switch) → Cisco Catalyst. As a result, it was moved.Special:Permalink/425538443#Requested move 84.250.14.116 (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 August 2022