Talk:Analytic philosophy

message: Social Constructivism and Cognitive Relativism? How can these views, by any stretch, be called Analytic?
If the intent is to say that Philosophy of Science is no longer notably Analytic, I would heartily agree in an informal emotive sense. But without a lot of corroboration being added, such a pronouncement is quite far from encyclopedic. (To disclose a personal interest, I would love to see it proven wrong!)
198.228.228.152 (talk) 08:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad examples of Philosophy of Science 

message: You might think, from the way that the article is written, that Analytic Philosophy was severely antithetical to Hegel’s talk of Absolute, Three-step Dialectics, Spirit, and self-moving Notions. If so, then Analytical Philosophy would be totally avoided and shunned by a great number of academics.173.72.111.113 (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is the impression you got from this article, then the article is accurate about Analytic Philosophy. - Atfyfe (talk) 00:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thesis, antithesis, synthesis originated with Fichte, not Hegel. I feel that removing all references to Hegel, and replacing them with "British Idealism", is relevant. Wittgenstein was influential in Continental Philosophy, yes, until he died. Hegel lived before the analytical-continental "divide"; It's hard to say that his work was what gave birth to "continental Philosophy". This article is saying that, indirectly. It's like saying the works of Kierkegaard were influenced by Hegel, even though Kierkegaard was strongly opposed to Hegelianism. To the average person "influences" can be divided into "positive" and "negative" rational categories, unless we want to pass judgement on them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OhWhyNot (talk • contribs) 04:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rational Categories is an important part of Hegelianism, while suspending judgement, which is a certain point I'm making OhWhyNot (talk) 04:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Contra Hegel

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Analytic philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071128165848/http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000129/article.pdf to http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000129/article.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002035247/http://web.syr.edu/~rnvangul/mirror-mirror.final.pdf to http://web.syr.edu/~rnvangul/mirror-mirror.final.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why is there a picture of Jules Vuillemin?  He is not mentioned in the body of the article. 109.153.242.98 (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jules Vuillemin 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Analytic philosophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090413090205/http://www.lutterworth.com/lp/titles/shwphil.htm to http://www.lutterworth.com/lp/titles/shwphil.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: This article is a complete mess structurally (a bulleted list and a massive blockquote in the lede—really?—and that's just for starters), to say nothing of the argument presented, which verges on incoherent. It needs to be reworked from the ground up. Nonstopdrivel (talk) 00:06, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the lead is a shocker. Banno (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Hear hear. 2600:1702:4C0:CBD0:CCCC:AD0A:A38E:57A (talk) 03:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess 

message: — Assignment last updated by RudyCarnap (talk) 10:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHIL 390 Contemporary Philosophy