Talk:Metroid Prime 3: Corruption/Archive 2

message: Does anyone know the name of the game engine (i.e., middleware) used in the development of MP3: Corruption? Is it third-party or in-house? Aeonassoc 14:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Engine 

message: Why hasn't this been done yet? Anyway you can jump to this game on the menu. :D OBEY STARMAN 18:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Corruption onto the Metroid series template. 

message: ===June 1st===
Twice now the realese date has been changed to june first... gamefaqs is NOT a reputable scource for release dates, as 90% of the "june first placeholder" dates turn out to be wrong. unless ninetendo has realesed some info i dont know about, it stays TBA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Miked54321 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked out GameSpot, and it claims the game will be released on June First, but it does not provide an actual source or press statement. Even though GS is considered a reliable source, the final word on Video Game release dates is determined by Nintendo or Retro. I guess we should leave it blank for now and maybe add a disclaimer --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk   16:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

text: While GS is a reliable source, it does not have any jurisdiction over when the game will actually be released. Best Buy and 1Up are reporting that the game has been delayed to 12/31/07. IGN has yet to make a specific claim as to when the game will be released. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk   03:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: December 31 likely isn't, as I've seen IGN put that in often for a title they know will come out in a specific year when they don't know the exact date.  They did that for both Final Fantasy V and VI Advance before we found out exactly when they were to be released. Arrow 16:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

text: It's already been done. Arrow 16:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: Twice now the realese date has been changed to june first... gamefaqs is NOT a reputable scource for release dates, as 90% of the "june first placeholder" dates turn out to be wrong. unless ninetendo has realesed some info i dont know about, it stays TBA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Miked54321 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: June 1st

message: Where did the June 1st release date come from? I looked in the history and this has been here for a while. Who confirmed it, and why isn't the confirmation news in the article? ShadowUltra 23:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked out GameSpot, and it claims the game will be released on June First, but it does not provide an actual source or press statement. Even though GS is considered a reliable source, the final word on Video Game release dates is determined by Nintendo or Retro. I guess we should leave it blank for now and maybe add a disclaimer --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk   16:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

text: While GS is a reliable source, it does not have any jurisdiction over when the game will actually be released. Best Buy and 1Up are reporting that the game has been delayed to 12/31/07. IGN has yet to make a specific claim as to when the game will be released. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk   03:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 1st? 

message: According to IGN, the release date for Japan is December 31, 2007 and for Europe is September 27, 2007,  Neoseeker also gives December 31 for Japan,  and a few websites give June 1 for North America. IGN doesn't give any source for this information so I can't tell if they've pulled the dates out of their heads, but is it a reliable source? --WikiSlasher 09:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: December 31 likely isn't, as I've seen IGN put that in often for a title they know will come out in a specific year when they don't know the exact date.  They did that for both Final Fantasy V and VI Advance before we found out exactly when they were to be released. Arrow 16:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Something other than June 1st

message: Nintendo delayed it 7 days. It was announced at the press conference of Phantom Hourglass. Should I change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackbird3216 (talk • contribs) 
:It's already been done. Arrow 16:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Now it's August 27

message: "but has now been pushed to 2007.[citation needed]"
Citation needed? The game's not OUT yet! There, citation by me, it's true.
Kingoomieiii 05:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not a reliable source - and for obvious reasons too. ;) See WP:RS, WP:ATT, and WP:OR. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk   21:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is what we refer to as "common knowledge". It's 2007, as far as I know, although maybe everyone I've ever known has been lying to me... Grandmasterka 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And this is what we refer to as speculation ;)- There's no official release date. For all we know, the game could be pushed to 2008 - See one of the sections on top. Until Retro or Nintendo releases an official statement, do not add questionable facts without proper sources. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk   21:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then say "...at least 2007".  Everybody wins. --Geoffron 01:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for date? 

message: We really need to add the skinny on what, if anything, is happening on this front.
DavidBeoulve 20:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiplayer? 

message: I got it from gonintendo.com but the source says it's from the Nintendo Press room.
Can someone add it in?
Also, on the boxart is the ESRB rating so we need to change the rating from RP to T.
:Go Nintendo is nowhere close to reliable source. We're better off waiting for the official thing Nintendo or Retro, thanks though --►ShadowJester07  23:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: [IGN] shows the boxart as well, though Gamespot does not at the moment.  Considering the large number of cites from IGN in the article, I assume that counts well enough as a proper source? Arrow 00:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not when it comes to images, especially when everyone tends to show different box arts. We'll put it up in good time., Nintendo should announce it soon.if the game has an August drop date. :) --►ShadowJester07  00:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Also true, but see WP:NOR. Also, you do not need to write your name by the header ;-) :-p --►ShadowJester07  01:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: No Prob, In accordance to Wikipedia's policies, I guess it would be alright to just use the logo right now. We can add the image, :image:Metroid Prime 3 Corruption cover.jpeg, when Nintendo officially confirms it, which should likely be soon. Until then, the image needs work to meet Wikipedia Fair Use policy. --►ShadowJester07  01:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: There have been some interesting developments; GameTrailers.com, Joystiq.com, GameSpy, and IGN are displaying the that MP3 cover. I have yet to see it on 1UP or Gamespot. At this point, it's probably fairly safe to assume that it is authentic. However, there's no way to be certain that's the finalized cover. I guess it would be alright to add the low-res version of the cover to the article, unless anyone else objects. Thanks for being cooperative and patient. --►ShadowJester07  14:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  i dont object, if it turns out to be fake, just upload the new one there, but if it is fake its a pretty good one. Salavat 14:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxart and rating revealed 

message: It is not acceptable to use a high-resolution version of the box-cover, since it is very likely to be copyrighted.  The version currently uploaded (several times) needs to be deleted and replaced with a scaled down version, in order to qualify as fair use.  It also needs to be tagged with . --Pekaje 05:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see someone uploaded a lower-resolution version.  It's probably good enough, but I think it would be better if it was only uploaded in the resolution it was used in the article (250px).  Someone still needs to add a fair use rationale, though. --Pekaje 08:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clear this up, ive seen 3 metroid prime 3 covers uploaded im isd tagging two and decided that :Image:Metroid Prime 3 - Corruption Coverart.jpg is the best one to keep for now as it is low res. Salavat 14:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's probably the best of three in terms of fair use. Please be sure to add a Fair Use Rationale --►ShadowJester07  14:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Fair Use now added. Salavat 14:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks, See my the message above. Unless anyone objects, I think we should add the image to the article. --►ShadowJester07  14:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Done. --Pekaje 18:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free image use (box cover) 

message: The boxart clearly shows a T rating yet the article says RP. Any objections to changing it to T?
:I think someone beat you to it  :p --►ShadowJester07  18:15, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The rating still needs to be changed 

message: The article mentions "that it's expected there will be atleast one hunter from Metroid Prime: hunters" in the game.
That qualifies as speculation no? I say we get rid of that.
"There is also speculation that at least one hunter from Metroid Prime Hunters will make a significant appearance."
You can clearly see in the quoted statement (which is in the article in the plot section) that it's speculation due to the fact it has the word speculation in the sentence... I deleted it but it just got put back up?
Why is that? Can somebody tell me how that doesn't count as speculation? Wikipedia standards say there should be NO speculation in articles.Kad 01:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I see some speculation in the article... 

message: I remember reading for the longest time that "Correuption will have multiplayer but not in the same style as Echoes" or something like that. The game comes out next month and we still have no idea if there's splitscreen multiplayer? Or was this confirmed somewhere and I missed it? ShadowUltra 14:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by the fact that said line is no longer anywhere in the article, I'd guess it was either speculation or a line from an old interview/article that nobody can recall the source of.  Either way, no-one at Nintendo or any of the major gaming news sites has said anything about that since. Arrow 20:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now the article mentions that Nintendo has confirmed there is no online.  Is that worth mentioning?  Metroid is an adventure series .Vegasjon 08:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While the Metroid series has primarily been offline its entire life, Hunters was online, and so it's an important enough topic that I think the line should remain. Arrowned 23:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiplayer? 

message: When will it be added?  (75.15.194.87 17:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not Sure, whenever editors get a chance to. :P --ShadowJester07 ► Talk  18:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New E3 Information 

message: It has been over a year and the article has improved quite a bit. I suggest that the cleanup tag be removed because of this. Marlith 04:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the items in the To-do section have even been addressed. This article is miles away from anything close to GA status. Roughly half of the article has been polished, while there are some crude spots. --ShadowJester07 ► Talk  18:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the cleanup tag still necessary? 

message: "It is currently unspecified whether or not Samus will speak in Metroid Prime 3"
I just got the latest issue of Nintendo Power yesterday. In its article on the game, it mentioned the full Voice Acting, but specifically mentioned that Samus would remain silent as in previous games.
:I'd like to point out that Samus doesn't have any actual lines, just the grunts and cries that she did in the previous Prime games. Also, the current page is wrong because Jennifer Hale plays absolutely no role in Corruption. Here's a list of the voice actors (taken from the instruction bookelet and confirmed by the in-game credits) -
Lainie Frasier
Grav Haddock
Claire Hamilton
Brian Jepson
Clavton Kjas
Tim Miller
Edwin Neal
Chris Sabat
Ken Webster
Also, neither the instruction booklet nor the in-game credits say who voices what characters. Action22579 07:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samus does not speak 

message: I noticed in the IGN movie of when you start in Samus' ship,that when the computer screen starts to malfunction,you can see the words,"Wii Format" appear briefly on the screen,so I just wanted to know if we should put this anywhere in the article.XLS724 23:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I personally don't consider that notable, I'd just like to point out that if it does end up going in the article, it doesn't need to do so in a trivia section. Arrowned 23:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Section? 

message: Confirmed here...
http://www.vooks.net/modules.php?module=article&id=12112 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.135.250 (talk • contribs) 
:Why was this removed from the article?--Richard (Talk - Contribs) 01:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Date 

message: Now that MP3 is going to launch, is the series going to end and get killed off??  Mr. Mario 192 14:30, 8 August 2007  (UTC)
:The people at Retro Studios have said several times (in IGN articles that the MP3 article actually cites) that the Prime games are only going to be a trilogy, and that #3 will provide closure to the mini-series. Arrowned 17:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't mean the Metroid series is done though, just the Primes. Rekameohs 0:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I implied that, I didn't mean to.  I entirely meant "the Prime trilogy" when I said providing closure. Arrowned 00:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly, the trailer released this morning says "Step behind the visor // One // Last // Mission", which seems to imply that this would be Samus's final mission.  Whether that means the Metroid series as a whole would be over at that point, or if it means that someone else would take Samus's place or something like that, obviously nobody knows.  This is all speculation until we have some proof one way or another - closest we have is Retro Studio's word on the trilogy.  Probably won't know more until MP3 is released. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 00:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Or, ya know, one last prime mission.GreenAiden555 10:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Metroid Fusion is last in the Metroid Time line. 24.7.141.45 15:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

text: For the record, the "bonus" ending that is acquired by obtaining all 100 pickups leaves room for a sequel. Action22579 07:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that sequel's called "Metroid II: Return of Samus" and it's for the Game Boy. ;) I only got 92%, so does the secret ending hint at the return of Ridley and the Space Pirates or Dark Samus? If it's Dark Samus, I will be upset because they're beating a dead horse. - Super Doogles 20:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he's talking about another possible game between Prime 3 and M2.  Prime 3's 100% pickup ending has nothing to do with tying into M2.  And no, it doesn't involve Dark Samus either; rest easy. Arrowned 20:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 

message: Reference #1 leads to a page that says the page you have requested is no longer available. Icestorm815 16:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nintendo's press site deletes articles more than a month old.  I've switched the reference with another one that's functional. Arrowned 18:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: A Wii Channel dedicated to a Metroid Prime 3 preview has been added in Wii Shop. Should this be mentioned in the article in some fashion?Youkai no unmei 13:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. We need to update that plot section; its been featuring the same two gigantic quotes for the past several months. --ShadowJester07 ► Talk  15:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metroid Prime 3 preview channel 

message: http://wii.nintendo.com/software_metroid.jsp Lists the release date as 8/28/07, and the article stated 8/27/07....?GreenAiden555 07:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See  The game is going to be released 8/27, and actually put up for sale on 8/28. --ShadowJester07 ► Talk  07:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't alter the Nintendo quote relating to the date. Just64helpin 22:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 27 release date 

message: Fix it up if it's going back up. The Preview Channel for MP3 is only available in America, so don't make it seem as if it's up for grab for every Wii system. And steer clear of saying how many videos are there. It could be four or five. Even on the shop channel details they said that it will get updated.--ChibiMrBubbles 17:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of deleting the paragraph wholesale (and therefore making the article read as though nothing happened), why don't you just fix the issues with the paragraph's wording? — KieferSkunk (talk) — 05:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I'll can create a "Promotion" subsection that would accomodate the channel, along with related items. It seems unique and notable enough for the lead (which should never have info exclusive to itself) so I'd assume a separate heading would be appropriate as well. Just64helpin 11:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll add what my references state, thanks. Contributions should also be based on existing Wikipedia guidelines and policy, rather than what another wikiarticle happens to have. Just64helpin 14:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My point, Chibi, was that just because a paragraph may be poorly worded (another assertion I don't agree with in this case) and/or contain incorrect information (also disagree), it's not necessarily the best course of action to just delete it and make someone rewrite it from scratch.  Improve content, don't just delete.  We should only delete content that is irrelevant, vandalism, or violates WP policies and (in this case) CVGProj guidelines.  If it takes work to improve the paragraph, then either do the work or tag the paragraph so someone else can do the work. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 15:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, I don't see why putting this information in the Development section is a bad thing.  Development covers all the information up to release, which I'd think could safely include promotional materials and announcements as well. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 15:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Chibi isn't "making" me, per se; I just don't want to deal with argumentative reverts. Just64helpin 16:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Just to clarify: I'm not accusing you of "making" anyone do anything, except that by deleting the original paragraph, you basically force another editor to re-add it (potentially leading to a revert war), whether by reverting your deletion or rewriting it from scratch.  I understand you're trying to help, and I appreciate that.  I'm just pointing out that I think deleting the paragraph outright when it could have been easily improved was not the right course of action. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 19:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: BTW, I'd also like to clarify that part of the reason I had an issue with this particular situation was that the original paragraph that had been deleted contained a useful citation to an external source.  If it had been an unsourced paragraph, I probably would not have made such a big deal about it. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 00:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

text: It certainly does, but it's being kept intentionally vague, which means any statements of similarity will be classified as OR.  We'll probably have to wait for the game to come out before we can make any real connection between the Aurora Unit and Mother Brain, if any exists.  I'm pretty certain that such a connection will be more-or-less explicitly stated in the game itself. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the preview channel 

message: Just notifying everyone that I've requested semi-protection of this article due to the ongoing revert war concerning the game's release date. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 22:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (grumbles) It would just so happen that when I go to make the request, the admins who normally respond in 5 minutes are suddenly absent... :P — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can't win 'em all - Alison ☺ 03:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection request 

message: [Comment moved from main page - Alison ☺]
After doing alot of research on Metroid Prime Three Corruption I was wondering "will this video game have online play?" Now sadly to my suprise all of the pages I researched said that Metroid Prime Three has been focused on it's single player game play. But for all of those people out there who are Big Metroid Prime fans you don't have to be completely upset because this video-game has not been released yet there is still a little bit of hope.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.68.248.87 (talk • contribs) 
:It's already been confirmed by Retro Studios themselves that this game won't have online play, as the article itself cites.  Also, this is not a forum for general discussion. Arrowned 04:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online play? 

message: Supposedly Toys R Us leaked this game along with Bioshock, but Bioshock's getting the publicity. Someone posted pics of himself playing the game, holding the case, and the instruction manual. I've yet to see these pics, however. ShadowUltra 04:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please find a reliable source for this information before adding it to article. BTW, the correct name is GameStop. Just64helpin 16:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's why I added the tag, because I'm not good at research and I was asking others to help find sources for this. ShadowUltra 16:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not what the tag is for; it's for discussing reliably sourced information missing from a wikiarticle. Just64helpin 16:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: There has been a video of roughly one hour of gameplay leaked, supposedly.Miles Blues 18:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how that helps, but thanks for the post. Just64helpin 18:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Possible further proof that the game has been leaked, and no need to be rude. Miles Blues 00:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, who's being rude? Just64helpin 01:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumor: leaked with Bioshock? 

message: This video was up on Gametrailers earlier today confirming the features listed in my previous edit.69.243.140.146 20:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What happened to the trailer on GameTrailers?  I see the one on Youtube, but it looks like GameTrailers may have taken it down again?  Any ideas? — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nintendo likely has the information/video under embargo until later in the week; most sites have to agree to those terms to get review copies of games in early.69.243.140.146 20:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, okay.  Yeah, the first 30 seconds or so of the video on Youtube looked like a video review, and generally those have to wait until one or two days before release, at the earliest.  I'm thinking that linking to the "unofficial" Youtube version may not be in our best interest right now, but I'm sort of on the fence about this.  I'll let others comment as well. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wii Connect 24 features & Checkpoint System confirmed by Gametrailers 

message: In the Metroid Prime (first) article, it says Nintendo Power gave it 10/10 which makes a claim in the Reception section of this article false.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.98.180.3 (talk) 06:02, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
:It is actually not false. While the Prime did receive a perfect score Nintendo power was not using the current 10 point system at that time which goes by a 0.5 increase each time. The first Prime game recveied 5 stars out of 5 which also increased by 0.5. Since they switched to the current 10 point system this is the only game ohter than RE4 get a 10/10. Heres a link []. It would also not make sense to directely compare the two scores because under the old syetem the second hightest score could be a 4.5 on 5 (90%) and under the current system a 9.5 on 10 (95%). This means that we cannot know if the first game would have received a perfect score under the new system because the second highest score was greater than it used to be. --70.48.108.229 02:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Silly.  I remember reading the RE4 review when they used the "star-system".  So all games listed as reciving (sp?) 5 star are 10/10. 76.170.11.100  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.11.100 (talk) 16:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception: Nintendo Power 

message: You all probably are aware of this, but the plot summary needs to be updated now that the game is out, and now that several people have beaten then game.  Just posting a reminder.  (124.121.93.216 12:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: Has anyone beaten this game yet? I simply must know who the final boss is! Is it just some Aurora Unit? To avoid spoilers you can post the answer on my talk page. I'm sorry, I just haven't been able to get a copy yet, but I don't mind getting spoiled. Nintenboy01 21:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've beaten the game already (I'm bad with rushing new games these days), so I went ahead and detailed the final boss on your talk page. Disaster KirbyTalk 21:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Boss 

message: "The C button (located on Nunchuck) morphs Samus to her Morph ball form, the Z trigger locks on and scans targets."
Well, duh... We know it is located on the Nunchuk. It is ovious it is on the Nunchuck. I'll remove it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.133.194.120 (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I wonder if a detailed description of the controls is necessary at all.  It's important to describe Samus's abilities, and in a general sense describe how the Wiimote and Nunchuk are used to exercise those abilities.  But describing which buttons do what goes into game-guide material that is better suited for a gaming wiki. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 05:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  C buttton 

message: This article could be improved with some screenshots, can someone who has the game take a few good ones (I hear it can take and email them in-game?) -Leif902 23:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can take them, but you can only e-mail them to other Wiis unless some mad genius finds a way to get them to the computer. And if you do, tell me. - Super Doogles 23:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Trivial matter to hook up a Wii to a recording device (camcorder, etc.) that can record in hi-def and can transfer its video and images to a computer.  I don't have the equipment to do this myself, but I'm sure someone does. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 05:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 

message: There needs to be a balance of pros and cons and at the moment it is to positive, one person even said without citation is could be game of the year which is just biased. Of cource we can keep what there already is but add on some cons to retain neutrality. Stabby Joe 14:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting... someone deleted it all together... thats not what I meant. Stabby Joe 22:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section 

message: Please don't archive discussions that are as recent as the past week or two. Miles Blues 03:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a rule. If discussions are dead, there's no point to add them. Wikipedia is not a forum of any sorts. --ShadowJester07 ► Talk  03:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving 

message: “Samus travels between the planets of Bryyo and Elysia, and the Pirate Homeworld, finding Chozo artifacts to further improve her powers.”
"Chozo artifacts" is misleading. This needs to be replaced with "upgrades to further upgrade her suit."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.135.128.121 (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chozo artifacts