Talk:Bande à part (film)

message: Was the nine-minute run through the Louvre referred to in the article actually filmed in the Louvre?  What's the source for this record? Theshibboleth 23:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmed in the Louvre 

message: Does accessible in the article mean that it is easy to get a copy of or easy to understand? Theshibboleth 00:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "accessible" 

message: The article says this movie influenced Quentin Tarentino and Hal Hartley. Where is this influence seen? What movies, what scenes? Tarentino's A Band Apart was probably influenced by the film, given the similarity in their names. How did Bertolucci pay homage to the Louvre scene? What scene is it and how was the mise-en-scene similar? Theshibboleth 06:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence 

message: Does the plot need to be more than a stub?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.235.241.206 (talk) 19:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Expanded. Portia1780 (talk) 18:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But is the current version quite right? While Franz does see the car of Arthur’s uncle on the motorway, surely it does not have the uncle in it but the veteran of Dien Bien Phu, the legionnaire, who then has the fatal exchange of shots with Arthur in the garden of Mme Victoria’s villa? --Hors-la-loi (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: Neither Odile nor Arthur identifies the dance as the Madison, and the steps performed are not consistent with those in the movie "Hairspray", nor with those very vaguely described in a newspaper article which documents the origin of the Madison. Follow wiki link to Madison (Dance) for more on this. Steve Pastor 21:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been addressed by someone else within the article.  Actress Anna Karina has been quoted as saying that the actors themselves (not the characters) referred to the dance as the "Madison," hence the name (this is cited in the article).  Portia1780 (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Madison" scene

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: If "the original name is the primary name" was the base rule, or guideline, or whatever you want to call it, there would be no problems... not very real ones. The closest thing you'd get are those certain groups who would prefer to have the article title represent whatever region they live in. NO language of the Wikipedia, or ANY encyclopedic source, should EVER do this. The original name is the name, where all others are alternatives; no exceptions. Deriving these name is usually simple enough, too.
Obviously, this applies to a thing with some sort of "organization" (multiple meanings intended, heh) behind it, that can give out whatever name, like products or works. There aren't really going to be "original names" for things like wars and revolutions, though I guess there's always "the Great War" for WWI (I'd love a solution to this one; remember that PBS documentary?). I don't think it'd be fair to apply onto a person either, but... 
(btw this movie looks super cute and i've got to get my eyes on it) Despatche (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The short and simple explanation is that film titles are translated into native idiom across every culture and nation in the world. The most obvious examples are the most telling ones. In the English-speaking world, not a single work of Ingmar Bergman has been shown under its original title and, if referenced, such classics as The Seventh Seal or Wild Strawberries would be virtually unrecognizable as Det sjunde inseglet and Smultronstället, respectively. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 14:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shameless plug re: naming 

message: The plot is a little too short and needs to be expanded more, also information on the films production, and reception needs to be added to the article as well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be expanded and missing a few sections 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bande à part (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719062937/http://www.filmforum.org/archivedfilms/bandpress.html to http://www.filmforum.org/archivedfilms/bandpress.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified