lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:QNH

message: qnh and qfe pages don't match. --Gbleem 16:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Is this image useful in this article? :Image:Aircraft altimeter.JPG.--DO11.10 00:10, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?

message: Article:  A typical radio conversation may be:-
Pilot: Golf Whiskey Alpha Charlie Foxtrot, requesting Cotswold QNH 
ATC: Golf Charlie Fox, Cotswold QNH one-zero-one-three 
Pilot: QNH one-zero-one-three, Golf Charlie Fox 
It "may" be, but in reality, it's not.  Rather, if you're above the transition altitude, you'd have 29.92 set, and neither you nor the controller would care about the local altimeter setting.
If you're below the transition altitude and are under IFR, each time you're handed off to the next controller the new controller will provide you with a local altimeter.  
Furthermore, if while under the same control you move into an area with a significantly different altimeter setting, the controller will give you an updated altimeter setting.
If you're under VFR with flight following, the controller will usually provide you with local altimeter settings.
Regardless, when transitioning from one center to another, in all three cases, it sounds like this:
Pilot (upon initial contact):  Seattle Center, Diamond November 6 2 0 Alpha Victor with you at 9,000 feet. (only the last two numbers and the letters afterward are said after initial contact.
Seattle Center:  2 0 Alpha Victor, initial contact.  Continue flight planned route, squawk 29.83.
Pilot:  2 0 Alpha Victor squawking 29.83.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.177.8.55 (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Use of squawk in above paragraph is questionable. Squawk codes are radar transponder settings (4 digits). And as the article mentions, altimeter read outs don't usually include the decimal point -- or do some pilots read back that way sometimes? Best to go by what the regs actually say they should say.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.122.201 (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio Comms

message: This might help: http://www.auf.asn.au/groundschool/umodule3.html Ozy42 (talk) 21:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: references

message: I have edited one paragraph and removed another dealing with the etymology of the term. This eliminates redundant trivia, and removes the sentence 'This was understood to mean, "I have a Question. What is the atmospheric pressure at Nil Height?"' which is almost certainly incorrect, and no reference is provided in any case.
I am tempted to chop the bit on mnemonics too for similar reasons, and the "radio conversation" on the grounds that it looks silly, but I'll exercise some restraint and leave those in for now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.144.86.55 (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Wikipedia talk:Annotated article

message: Why are there only external links? An example of a 'references' section (and probably even notes) would be instructive, I think. — mark ✎ 16:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think an example of a "References" section needs to be added in the standard position (that is, under the "See also" section.) -- Mecandes 12:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Could text indentation (using the ":") be included in that article, please.
--Dietmar Lettau 12:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include indentation 

message: Why is the word unladen in boldface in the lead paragraph? I'd remove this in a real article. —D. Monack talk 08:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of bold

message: I guess the real question should be, "Why isn't a featured article used for annotation?" If this is supposed to be instructional, shouldn't the best possible example be used? Autorack even has a cleanup notice on it. Ideally, the example used would have a references section and maybe an infobox. —D. Monack talk 08:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another article?

message: Should the annotation about the picture really repeat so many times? 
Craig Pemberton (talk) 02:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetitive annotation 

message: Why autoracks specifically? What is so special about them? Do you guys, huh, like autoracks?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.139.143.122 (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are autoracks special in any way? 

message: Deleted the following section:
 Questo elaborato prende come riferimento il testo “Cervelli che parlano: il dibattito su mente,coscienza e intelligenza artificiale”. Gli spunti argomentativi sono stati selezionati dal capitolo “Intenzionalità e intelligenza artificiale” di Eddy Carli e si è cercato poi di elaborarli, attraverso l’evento concreto di bere una birra, tenendo come riferimento le teorie e il punto di vista di Antonio Damasio.
Does not appear to have anything to do with the article aside from the obvious issue of not being in English.Bobdog54 (talk) 13:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Section in Italian 

message: Since the change of the layout in 2023 TOC is displayed elsewhere. I'm not sure how to properly address that. RadostW (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete comments
Talk:Imaginary foreign objects e.g. fiberglass, etc

message: Added a verification tag. If references for this condition do exist, this article will need a better name (in other words, a page move). jareha 17:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree with the better name. Copysan 00:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verify, move
Category talk:World War I battleships of the United Kingdom

message: ==== :Category:World War I British battleships to :Category:World War I battleships of the United Kingdom ====
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.  
The result of the debate was Rename K1Bond007 22:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD debate 

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it.  Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any).  No further edits should be made to this page.  
The result of the debate was Rename K1Bond007 22:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:World War I British battleships]] to [[:Category:World War I battleships of the United Kingdom]]
Talk:Assyrians

message: I think it'd be much simpler to be labeled as Assyrians instead of Assyiran people. It's much easier to reference and more appropriate.
:Yes by all means! One should be merged into the other - but which title is better of the two? //Big Adamsky 18:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There has just been a huge cleanup withing the last fifteen minutes: Aramaeans, Assyrians, Chaldeans, and Syriacs now have their own page!  I tried putting them all into one page, but it didn't work out too well, but to link them all together, there is a  at the bottum of all of the pages.  --Domthedude001 18:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cleanup 

message: I'm deleting this page so that I can have Assyrian people moved to Assyrians.
:The correct way to move a page that needs administrator's assistance is to list it at WP:RM. If you follow the procedure, that should create a voting page for community consensus. --Gareth Hughes 17:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's likely to be uncontroversial, though, an admin can just go ahead and do it without there being a vote. --Angr (t·c) 19:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: I propose dealing with the history of the Assyrian people under the article with that name, and possibly transferring paragraphs concering their ancient state to Assyrian Empire. Having a separate entry on ancient Assyrians seems redundant to me. Big Adamsky 19:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Idea, Go for it! --Domthedude001 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Shouldn't this be a disambiguation page leading to both the Assyrian empire and Assyrian people of today? Funkynusayri 11:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page
Talk:Treaty of Corbeil (1258)

message: On the article it is stated that it is the Corbeil in the Ile de France, but according to Zurita (Anales de Aragon) it shoud be some place near Montpelier (where the meeting between the kings took place) (vol I pg 291)
Luego pasó el rey a Mompeller; y estando en aquella villa se concertó con el rey de Francia en las diferencias antiguas que tuvieron sus predecesores; y confirmaron una perpetua paz y amistad entre sus casas; y para esto se determinó que se viesen en un lugar que se dice Carbolio.
Los reyes renuncian cada uno en favor del otro ciertos derechos que pretendían tener y quedan en perpetua alianza. Esto fue por el mes de mayo de este año de 1258; y a 11 de aquel mes se concertó entre ambos reyes de tal suerte que el rey de Francia renunciaba el derecho que pretendía y alegaba tener por el feudo antiguo sobre los condados de Barcelona, Urgel, Besalú, Rosellón, Ampurias, Cerdania, Conflente, Girona y Osona y sus villas y castillos; y el rey de Aragón por el de Carcasona y el Carcases, Roda y Rodes, Lauraco y Lauragues y por el Besés y su vizcondado, Leocata, Albiges, Ruhen y por el condado de Fox, Cahors, Narbona y su ducado, Mintrua y el Mintrues, Fenolleda y el Fenollades, tierras de Salto, Perapertusa, y por el condado de Aimillán y vizcondado de Crodon, Gabaldán, Nimes, Solos y su condado y Sant Gil, con todas sus villas y derechos. 
It's doubtful that James would make so long a travel ... Anyone has better data ?--Wllacer 17:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Corbeil 

message: The name of this article creates difficulties.  The usual construction in English is to call such an agreement "The Treaty of <Place>" when the treaty is named after the location at which it was created.  By looking with Google, many more hits show for Treaty of Corbeil than for Corbeil Treaty, although there are hits for the latter on some English language sites.  Indeed, in the Spanish and the French, it is the "Treaty of Corbeil" in literal translation.
In general, such a naming convention should be followed, I believe.  Are there any thoughts on this? --DSYoungEsq 15:33, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A cursory look on List of treaties shows that your proposed title is indeed the most usual way of naming in Wikipedia. So you can count on my vote--Wllacer 16:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming Conventions

message: There is another treaty of Corbeil, signed in 1326. If you check here, you'll see that roughly half the articles that link here do so incorrectly. That treaty of Corbeil doesn't have an article (yet). Any objections to moving this article and providing a disambiguation page ? Angus McLellan 21:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Move away. (Make sure that you fix any broken links though.) Do we need the brackets though? How about simply Treaty of Corbeil 1258?--Mais oui! 18:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had thought there was a "naming convention", but more searching makes me think there isn't. Changed accordingly. Angus McLellan 18:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Further to Naming: Move to Treaty of Corbeil 1258
Talk:Special administrative region (Republic of China)

message: ==Previous discussion== 
For discussion about this page before it was split from special administrative region, click here (#1 #2). — Instantnood 17:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

message: An veg vfjzcsbvxvzgg Nash Jrndm 2001:4450:461B:9700:4DA4:B2F:D7C1:76DD (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dhvb f.vzm Xj cubdjvxnnxbfn hdcmvmxvjvhxbcv 

message: Xhxgdb jpb. Xwgzvzvw b CvvC cga. Sdfbxcbz 2001:4450:461B:9700:4DA4:B2F:D7C1:76DD (talk) 05:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fbxvmbcczv xwgvvSwipe left or right to deleteSwipe left or right to delete
Talk:Cerdanya (comarca)

message: The official name of the comarca in Spain is "Cerdanya" (as we use Catalan spellings for places in Catalonia): we have an article about the geographical region which spans the French-Spanish border at the English spelling "Cerdagne". I suggest a move to Cerdanya, with a a disambig to indicate the wider article. Physchim62 (talk) 17:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I followed the Catalan Wikipedia in calling it Baixa Cerdanya. I have no stake in what we end up calling it, as long as it is citable, given that there is apparently some disagreement. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

text: There is also the article Cerdanya, which appears to be about the comarca as well. Shouldn't this article be merged into that one, following the naming pattern of the other comarques (i.e. without the trailing "(comarca)" in the title)? —[AlanM1(talk)]— 05:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Stochastic electrodynamics

message: Some comments sound as if SED contains a theory of electric gravity. Is this actually what the proponents are saying? If so, how do they explain how gravity seems to couple only to mass and energy density and not to the electromagnetic variables? 198.228.228.150 (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, well asking questions about 'electric gravity' is exactly why this article remains in a sorry state User:Linas (talk) 17:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: electric gravity

message: :File:A pilot-wave walker in a circular corral.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 07:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:A pilot-wave walker in a circular corral.png

message: The current "Classical background field" looks like it dropped in for a visit unannounced ;-).  I propose to delete the section as unreferenced. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the section with a description of the article topic model. Johnjbarton (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Classical background field" section unreferenced and unclear.
Talk:Long Ago and Far Away (TV series)

message: More than the last ten edits have been about whether this show is animated or not.  Can we come to consensus here? Dkreisst (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories:1990s and 1980s American animated television series
Talk:Bill Fox (musician)

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 17:45, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: There is another musician named Bill Fox who is from the Cleveland area.  He grew up in University Heights, a suburb on the near east side of Cleveland.  He currently lives in Nazareth, PA.  He has appeared on several CDs by Emerald City, Pinnacle, Xeroid Entity, and many others in the electronic music field - especially CDs associated with the Ricochet Gathings, Different Skies, and electro-music festivals.
This Bill Fox is the true person who has a photo credit on Radio Massacre International's CD "Emissaries" and an engineering credit on Steve Curtain's CD "Wires on Dry Trees Turn Night into Day" despite the incorrect credit as shown on Artist Direct at <http://artistdirect.com/nad/music/artist/links/0,,593530,00.html>.  I should know, because I *AM* that other Bill Fox and my website is at <http://soundscapes.us/bill>.  I am also at <http://myspace.com/billfox>.  I am currently revamping my website to show all of my CD credits, including liner notes for "Four the Truth" released on the Dutch label Groove Unlimited.  I also appear on "Phrasing the Air," Act 2 of vidnaObmana's Opera for Four Fusion Works (Hypnos Records).
Cheers,
Bill Fox —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.202.2.241 (talk) 05:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet Another Bill Fox from Cleveland
Talk:Mark Bourque

message: Note, I replaced the article quotes with article titles because a) article quotes if too long might not be fair use and b) the article title will be needed to re-find article if/when it goes offline.  --Rob 17:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Adventures of Mini-Goddess

message: Now if I can aquire the episode listings (with kanji and romaji) I can create a list for it ;) --Cool CatTalk|@ 17:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: DVDs

message: Why isn't this article using the  set of boxes? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather then complain, why not just change it? --Farix (Talk) 13:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Shooting range

message: Agree I think that Rifle range would be much better as part of the Shooting range article. Arthur 18:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Shooting range is more generic term, article need to be one to afford comparison between types of ranges and cut down on duplication. — Deon Steyn (talk) 12:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: "Typically, all public ranges require that all guns be unloaded and variously securely encased and/or trigger-locked prior to entering, or leaving, the range facility, irrespective of whether one holds a concealed carry license in jurisdictions where concealed carry is legal."
I've never been to a range where this is policy. In fact, most ranges welcome concealed and open carry. Any source, citation? In the mean time I'll change it to "Some ranges..."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.88.89.117 (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common safety practices 

message: In the interest of comprehensiveness, it would be good if this article covered the topic of lead poisoning at gun ranges, and efforts to clean it up. (For example: ) Thank you. Praemonitus (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead poisoning 
Talk:Hans Christian Ørsted Institute

message: The majority of the current text is merged from H.C. Ørsted and August Krogh Institutes. That page had an old VfD debate which nobody had acted on. Having two pages on HCØ was redundant in any case, so I moved the text here while waiting for someone to decide that the topic is not really encyclopedic and delete the lot. :-) Henning Makholm 18:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But where is the August Krogh Institute now? Anyway it might make sense to merge more to one article on Nørre Campus or just Universitetsparken. Carewolf 09:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There was never any text about AKI in the old article; it was just mistitled. –Henning Makholm 00:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge and old VfD
Talk:Chapter (books)

message: The article would benefit by also mentioning or defining the terms subchapter, section, and asterism. In particular, is "section" a technical term or fixed to any degree in the field of publishing? — Hippietrail 18:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that by asterism you are referring to asterism (typography)? This would be preferable than asterism which is a disambig page. For any new editors, typing asterism will link to the correct asterism page, without reading awkwardly.Paddles 14:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to see a typography of a book here. --157.24.23.136 (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[asterism (typography)]] 

message: I have searched for this information on Google but haven't found the answer.  Not all books have chapters with this kind of introductory material, and to clarify, the material is not part of the story. I have seen quotes and poems used this way. One of my favorite books, Artistic Differences, has these great anecdotes (which I am guessing are true) at the start of each chapter.Mpbruskotter (talk) 18:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do you call an "introduction" that appears at the start of a chapter? 

message: A number of video games, mostly role-playing video games, use a chapter division very similar to books. I'm wondering because of their similarity should this article be moved and expanded or should a separate article for video games be created?陣内Jinnai 22:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You should know that role games are often based on a book (and its chapters), and they were played as board games.--157.24.23.136 (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  video games 

message: Should there be examples of what a chapter title looks like on a page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.150.251.124 (talk) 07:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: The article should address, whether chapter titles should be in "Camel" case (starting every word except of prepositions and particles with a capital letter). VictorPorton (talk) 19:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case of chapter titles?  

message: the page lists (right at the beginning of the text) the french translation of 'chapter' as 'sommaires'. the correct word would be 'chapitre'.
'sommaire' is the french name for the table of contents of a book. 'sommaires', the translation the article gives, is its plural.
even in old french books, i have not seen chapters being called 'sommaires'. there is a chance i might be wrong about the historical usage, but at any rate, the translation given in the article does not correspond to modern french usage.
i suggest correcting the translation or removing it altogether, as i don't think it is really useful information in this article. what i mean is, why would the french version of the word be specially relevant enough to warrant its separate inclusion in the article? 2A02:1205:505D:6F00:3DF4:20CB:7C8A:E139 (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'chapter' is 'chapitre' in french
Talk:The Leaveners

message: Ok guys, here's to this article growing. But, let's make sure that it's an article and not an advert, that'll be tricky but it's important. Paul Carpenter 18:12, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Hey guys. I've just added a line to the section on WS&V, since the group has now officially separated from the Leaveners. I'm not sure whether wikipedia would want the section expansion template left or removed, so I've left it where it is for now. Matthew Williams (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Words, Signs & Vibes