Talk:Robot-assisted surgery

message: this is a better link
https://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/health-medical/5-surgical-robots-2019/
it is very intesting
There is no criticism of robotic surgery listed here, making the article read like a commercial or advertisement for da Vinci Surgical Systems. Criticism should be added. On possible reference:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brobdignagian (talk • contribs) 19:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: couldn't agree more. this article is a sad excuse for what an encyclopedia entry should be. the mention of various 'prominent' practitioners reeks of commercial interest.Toyokuni3 (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I agree. It also appears that this is describing the same event as detailed in the preceding paragraph, thus I have removed the redundant, unverifiable line. --150.135.210.32 (talk) 19:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: This article is on an important subject, but care needs to be taken with sources/links. Two of the links to external sites are broken (making some information unverifiable), and the third (to Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc) looks suspiciously like a spamlink; in addition, many statements in the article are unsupported. I have no doubt that they are true, and were added in good faith, but it is worth remembering that information that is unsourced can be challenged or removed by any editor at any time ;) Check out WP:VERIFY for more info - hope this helps! EyeSereneTALK 20:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some more information about orthopedic surgical robots. The book reference added for the "CASPAR" system contains a good deal more information, also about the two other robots (Acrobot and Orthodoc); unfortunately, I don't have time to add it all. 81.165.60.153 (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiability

message: The reference to animal testing seems very out of place here and I'd like to nominate it for removal. Testing on animals is certainly not limited to robotic surgery and arguably the techniques of such surgery will be of great benefit to animals as well. (The entry on laparoscopy says that the first procedure on animals occurred more than 100 years ago, though obviously not with robots.) Without greater context, this section seems politically biased and unwarranted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.197.18 (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Animal Testing

message: this website seems not to have been updated since 5/00. and it is rather pov. it is a commercial site. the videos don't work. hell, for all i know the company may have failed. i think it should go.Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Feel free to remove other sites yourself, as long as you record the reasons in the edit summery. --Jiuguang (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AESOP and Zeus

message: I'm not so sure about how valid this claim is in the history section.  After reading a number of articles on robotic surgery I haven't come across any robots that are capable of autonomous operation.  Furthermore I found this article which affirms that there was no autonomy involved in this particular operation. Also there is no citation for the statement about robots replacing surgeons.  Remove? 217.232.248.151 (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AI Surgeon Robot

message: i just reverted an unexplained deletion of the link to this site by an unregistered user. now that i look at the site, it does look somewhat commercial. i am unsure of what to do and hope someone else has a better idea.Toyokuni3 (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: UC Santa Cruz

message: my attention was called to this item in the history section by someone tagging it for citation. what it really needed was to be gone. if there isn't a wp policy on talking about ongoing litigation, there ought to be. moreover, the writing style had newspaper written all over it, suggesting strongly that it had been lifted pretty much verbatim from a tampa paper. Toyokuni3 (talk) 12:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Al Greenway

message: The fact, that before September 2010 there was no robotic system with force feedback is wrong. The Eindhoven University of Technology was not the first who invented this with the Sofie surgical system. I added the time when the MiroSurge was presented to the public, but I find it hard to just delete the line with the Sofie robot. What should I do?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.247.247.239 (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline not correct 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Robot-assisted surgery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140416210715/http://www.childrenshospital.org/robotics to http://www.childrenshospital.org/robotics
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: {request edit}
I know some people in the world of robot-assisted dental implant surgery, so I don't want to make the change myself, but dental implantology is also a venue for robot-assisted surgery. At the end of the first section of the article on robot-assisted surgery, before the history section, I would propose adding a section, "Dental Implants," to read:
Around 2010, computer-assisted surgery in general and robot-assisted surgery in particular emerged for dental implants. {cite: Sun X, McKenzie FD, Bawab S, Li J, Yoon Y, Huang JK. Automated dental implantation using image-guided robotics: registration results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011 Sep;6(5):627-34. doi: 10.1007/s11548-010-0543-3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221831} Such systems can achieve results comparable or superior to static templates to guide implant drilling and placement and may use a variety of approaches, such as optical tracking of the dental drill and patient's jaw {cite: Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, Ryan J. Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):92-99. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5004. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27643585} or a robotic arm with haptic feedback {cite: Grant, BN. Implant Surgery With Robotic Guidance – Digital Workflows For Patient Care. Oral Health. June 10, 2019. https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/implant-surgery-with-robotic-guidance-digital-workflows-for-patient-care/} 
Mark writing (talk) 19:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dental Implants

message: — Assignment last updated by StellaQuan441 (talk) 01:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP23 - Sect 201 - Thu