Talk:John Marshall Harlan

message: I am rather disturbed by the part concerning a supposed bias against Chinese : 
:Harlan's liberal views on race did not extend to the Chinese. He wrote this biased statement in his dissent: "There is a race so different from our own that we do not permit those belonging to it to become citizens of the United States. Persons belonging to it are, with few exceptions, absolutely excluded from our country. I allude to the Chinese race. ...But by the statute in question, a Chinaman can ride in the same passenger coach with white citizens of the United States, while citizens of the black race in Louisiana [cannot]...''
Maybe Harlan disliked or despised the Chinese, I have no idea.  Yet to call this part of the Plessy dissent biased sounds  to me like a total misunderstanding. Harlan contrasts "the Chinse race"'s lots to "the black race"'s. A Chinaman is not a citizen and the law of the country are hostile to him (Chinese Exclusion Act, 1882). A Black is a citizen and a such is entiled to the equal protection of the laws. Yet the former is allowed in the Whites' coach and the latter is not.  Certainly, his point is not that the Chinaman should be excluded, nor that the Chinese Exclusion Act is a good idea (nor a bad one). This contrast simply shows that the law of Louisiana is a display of prejudice against the Blacks and tramples citizenship and the equals protection clause. In my view, the only suspicious phrase is "a race so different from our own". I do not know whether he states his opinion,  or merely the opinion of the country, as expressed in its law. our own is an interesting phrase too, it most certainly means white, but that should not be surprising. Also note this alleged bias did not preclude him to vote with the Court in Yick Wo v. Hopkins.  -- Didup 19:27, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This may be of interest, and of course the full article from which the link provides a summary. Newyorkbrad 22:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prejudiced against the Chinese? Why? 

message: What is a modern law degree? Numerous earlier justices had law degrees. Anthony717 21:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a change in the nature of legal education in the US in the 19th century - see Juris Doctor for a lot of the details although it's light on dates. Timrollpickering (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern law degree? 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/John Marshall Harlan was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-created subpage 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/John Marshall Harlan was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-created subpage 

message: Is this case really so important that it warrants being mentioned in the article introduction?  It isn't even mentioned in the rest of the article, and seems to be included in the intro just as a way of saying that Harlan was really a racist, in spite of his famous dissents in the Civil Rights Cases and Plessy.  john k (talk) 12:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pace v. Alabama 

message: Allyson Hobbs has written a history on passing in the US, and noted the Harlan family and Robert James Harlan's life. He did not try to pass, although he appeared to be majority white and could have. (See article on Black Past website for photo.) She suggests that the experience of having a mulatto half-brother raised and educated in the household may have influenced John Marshall Harlan's views, which he expressed in his dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson. As it was unusual for white fathers of mixed-race sons born into slavery to have them educated, it seems worthwhile to point out the circumstances of the Harlan household. JM Harlan would likely have heard of his half-brother's success in business as well.Parkwells (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep content on half-brother 

message: The last paragraph in the early life and education section has Harlan earning his law degree in 1924, which is quite an accomplishment for someone who died in 1911. Sam with admittance to bar in 1925. Maybe they meant 1825?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.233.3.136 (talk) 01:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up! The material that you pointed out actually was about Harlan's grandson, John Marshall Harlan II. I removed the info. --1990'sguy (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article now says his father "sent John to attend law school at Transylvania University in 1853". I have my doubts about that date. Another site says he entered the university in 1850, studied there for two years, then completed his legal training in his father's law practice, and was admitted to the bar in 1853. That's different by three years. The source cited in the article is not an online source, so I cannot check what it says. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found another source saying the same thing and fixed the article. I could not find the book (at least the right version or pages) as well, so I just cited the other sources we found instead. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of admittance to bar 

message: The infobox of this article currently states that Harlan's term ended in 1867, however according to the American National Biography Online, Harlan lost his re-election campaign for the office in 1868, making it quite unlikely that his term ended the year before. Any clarification/correction would be great, as well as for the dates in the article Attorney General of Kentucky. --1990'sguy (talk) 23:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Harlan's term as Attorney General end? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on John Marshall Harlan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090119042717/http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/lib_hist/Courts/supreme/judges/harlan/jmh-lop.html to http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/lib_hist/Courts/supreme/judges/harlan/jmh-lop.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091215011212/http://www.centre.edu/web/news/2009/harlan.html to http://www.centre.edu/web/news/2009/harlan.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090119042736/http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/lib_hist/Courts/supreme/judges/harlan/jmh-bib.html to http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/lib_hist/Courts/supreme/judges/harlan/jmh-bib.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091215011212/http://www.centre.edu/web/news/2009/harlan.html to http://www.centre.edu/web/news/2009/harlan.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Marshall Harlan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502210444/http://connect1.ajaxdocumentviewer.com/viewerajax.php?rICwdlhZy4Sw3Go9qSc3lb75g7UNi+4Hu9Qw%2FatAa7LQHH5lyGkQ1e0Kbs9re8Wwynit1G8J3Zgd8Za+kHHWcGxOzZcTljOmybU93ltJNWL52jE6VApmf1u6aIBbJEXvLGppOI2MKqu1QrdgCEKPZM6KyV1kXg35RaB0p%2FtXGNIVSgu%2FkCHJtH+wjzFezvoxpt8Cy3+572ZLp09iyYiSTnUYUIWhWiZi4r7E9wxDxbJIje4zy9YPTg3Q8nuYPBw%2FyJ6%2FsIPuAnlEXyZv%2FFO5whkL9VYJG1TK0KwY+G7P+A3HjnU%2FeEyeclhOc069OAtic8p+nHvoBhIwBI5IpaVKexzEj0fi6jNiEhF%2FoPPdWQVyFkISxCKazr6UyRpEwL9uRZt5XWZV3wSVzly3%2FhX5WwY8wirRWHzu0Qk62V+irCU= to http://connect1.ajaxdocumentviewer.com/viewerajax.php?rICwdlhZy4Sw3Go9qSc3lb75g7UNi%2B4Hu9Qw%2FatAa7LQHH5lyGkQ1e0Kbs9re8Wwynit1G8J3Zgd8Za%2BkHHWcGxOzZcTljOmybU93ltJNWL52jE6VApmf1u6aIBbJEXvLGppOI2MKqu1QrdgCEKPZM6KyV1kXg35RaB0p%2FtXGNIVSgu%2FkCHJtH%2BwjzFezvoxpt8Cy3%2B572ZLp09iyYiSTnUYUIWhWiZi4r7E9wxDxbJIje4zy9YPTg3Q8nuYPBw%2FyJ6%2FsIPuAnlEXyZv%2FFO5whkL9VYJG1TK0KwY%2BG7P%2BA3HjnU%2FeEyeclhOc069OAtic8p%2BnHvoBhIwBI5IpaVKexzEj0fi6jNiEhF%2FoPPdWQVyFkISxCKazr6UyRpEwL9uRZt5XWZV3wSVzly3%2FhX5WwY8wirRWHzu0Qk62V%2BirCU%3D
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111093100/http://www.uakron.edu/law/lawreview/v32/docs/chinproof323.pdf to http://www.uakron.edu/law/lawreview/v32/docs/chinproof323.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: There have been changes and reversions regarding the following line in Harlan’s Wikipedia biography:
===Religious beliefs===
Harlan was a fundamentalist Christian, and his Christian beliefs played a large role in his life, as a Supreme Court justice, and in general.Przybyszewski (1999), pgs. 47–60. During his tenure as a justice, he was an elder at the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C.,Przybyszewski (1999), p. 48. and there he taught a Sunday school class of middle-aged men from 1896 until his death in 1911.
===Explanation===
He was not a ”Fundamentalist”.  I have exchanged emails with Professor Pszybyszewski (who is inaccurately cited in the passage above in support of this assertion, and here is her comment (my Wiki identity is Ballinacurra Weston, but my actual name, as shown below, is Francis Helminski):
====Email exchange with Harlan’s biographer====
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 14th, 2021 at 11:38, Linda Przybyszewski <lprzybys@nd.edu> wrote:
Hi there, 
No, I would not call him a fundamentalist. It's an anachronistic claim as you point out.
He was a conservative Presbyterian specifically, or a conservative Protestant generally.
I hope this is of some help to you.
Regards, 
Professor Pski
Linda Przybyszewski, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of History
University of Notre Dame 
Website: http://www.professorpski.com/   
Blog: http://professorpski.tumblr.com/ 
History Department 
434 Decio Hall 
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Office: 402 Decio Hall , 574-631-7661
On Oct 11, 2021, at 2:41 PM, fjmh <fjmh@protonmail.com> wrote:
﻿
Dear Professor Przybyszewski:
I am a lawyer and Wikipedia editor, and have become involved in somewhat of a dispute with other editors regarding a characterization of Justice JM Harlan in his Wiki bio (found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Marshall_Harlan). 
The bio currently reads: "Harlan was a fundamentalist Christian, and his Christian beliefs played a large role in his life, as a Supreme Court justice, and in general."  There are two footnotes to this statement: one to pp. 47-60 in your biography of Justice Harlan, the second to this website: https://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/robes_harlan.html.
I am disputing with other editors that Harlan is accurately called a "fundamentalist Christian."  Certainly I understand that he was a religious conservative, and a biblical inerrantist, but the term "fundamentalist" is, I think, anachronistic when applied to him because it was not used in print until 1920.  In addition, I cannot find the term "fundamentalist" in pp. 47-60 (or anywhere else) in your biography as applied to Justice Harlan's religious beliefs. 
I think some guidance from you on this point, if you are willing to comment, would go a long way to resolving this little Wikipedia controversy.  Either way, I very much appreciate your time!
Best regards,
Frank Helminski
(Member of the Pennsylvania Bar)
Paoli, PA, 19301
fjmh@pm.me
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ End Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
===Suggested conclusion===
Shall we end this back-and-forth?  I am willing to escalate this as necessary.  Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 02:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken a stab at rewriting this section in a way that better reflects the sources. "Fundamentalist" is not the term favored by most sources, so I've omitted it. Feel free to revise as you like. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Extraordinary Writ's changes are significantly better than the original wording that merely omitted "fundamentalist." I can accept this version. --1990'sguy (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Harlan a Christian ”Fundamentalist”?

message: Shall we end this back-and-forth?  I am willing to escalate this as necessary.  Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 02:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken a stab at rewriting this section in a way that better reflects the sources. "Fundamentalist" is not the term favored by most sources, so I've omitted it. Feel free to revise as you like. Cheers, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested conclusion

message: Thank you Extraordinary Writ.  I think your revisions are well-done and, as far as I understand the sources, accurate.   Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 19:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Extraordinary Writ's changes are significantly better than the original wording that merely omitted "fundamentalist." I can accept this version. --1990'sguy (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: "He served as the Republican nominee for governor of Kentucky in 1871; though he finished a distant second to incumbent Democratic Governor Preston Leslie, Harlan nonetheless established himself as the leader of the Kentucky Republican Party during the campaign". Was Harlan the nominee that year? He did run as the nominee in 1875. Is it possible that he did run in 1871 but failed to capture the nomination, or did he never run at all that year? Or otherwise the Wikipedia article 1871 Kentucky gubernatorial election is utterly wrong about who the GOP nominee is? Because it shows a different GOP nominee. SecretName101 (talk) 01:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.nytimes.com/1871/08/08/archives/elections-the-kentucky-electionslarge-republican-gains.html This article indicates he was the nominee and that the 1871 article is just wrong. SecretName101 (talk) 01:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the other article was wrong, and I corrected it. SecretName101 (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1871 gubernatorial candidacy? Misconstruing facts