lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Angela Alioto

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- — CactusWriter | needles 10:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Canadian Union of Postal Workers

message: Currently, there is an unsourced paragraph that reads as follows:
In 1989, the Canadian Labour Relations Board forced all Canada Post employees under one union. Until that time CUPW, had represented only "inside employees" with the Letter Carriers Union of Canada representing "outdoor employees" and various other unions such as the technical workers of the Union of Postal Communications Workers (Public Service Alliance of Canada) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers representing smaller units of specialized workers within the post office. After a vote, CUPW was chosen over LCUC to be the sole union representing all postal employees.
The Letter Carriers no longer exists and I can find no evidence that the IBEW currently represents any CP workers.  And I think the Labor Board did collapse many of the bargaining units but there are still 3 other active unions.  I'm going to rework this information with sources.  But, if anyone has some sources on the 1989 merger/bargaining unit changes, jump in and clean things up further since I'm doing a little guesswork.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other unions
Talk:Peter Gutmann (computer scientist)

message: This section does not belong here. It should be either in italics at the head of the artcile to assist those here by mistake, or there whould be formal diambiguation page. I'll try to remember to come back and hange thisgs around, but the editor inculded this section might want to act before my memory actually works. ww 21:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, converted into a disambiguation. -- intgr 23:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'other Peter Gutmann' section
Talk:Communications Workers of America

message: dats my name  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.166.216.49 (talk) 22:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  jordans 

message: *Google Workers Join CWA, 7 January 2020
My wish is that Google employees will also use some of their skill to share technology with unions and union organizers.
 Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google workers join
Talk:Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada

message: I added the CEP logo, since the page was lacking.  Given that the logo is plastered almost everywhere around my house, I found it appalling that it wasn't on the article! moeburn (talk) 09:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Hello I was wondering about pension  Ray465 (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union pension
Talk:International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers

message: The article states that,
:"the International's current President, Frank M. Ryan, and one of its future Presidents, Paul "Paddy" Morrin, were convicted along with several other defendants on December 31, 1912"
The current president would have to be a very old person, for this to be true. I'm at the end of an editing session, and cannot explore this right now, thus, this note. (Although i think by "current" the editor meant "current in 1912", so perhaps an easy fix.) Richard Myers (talk) 09:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem with this article 
Talk:Anna Catherine Parnell

message: She drowned at Ilfracombe  -  was it ruled an accident or suicide? Valetude (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it matter? The DIB don't make a call on it. Smirkybec (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circumstances of death
Talk:Pinocchio: The Series

message: Englis corner 77.77.219.83 (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Cascajal block

message: I propose that this article should be merged and become a redirect to Olmec hieroglyphs, which is going to become a much bigger article quite soon. Does anyone object?  -- Evertype·✆ 19:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, for me it's ok. ;) Olmeque 20:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anne-Grete Strøm-Erichsen

message: I disagree with removing the following: "Irregular handling of incoming emails from soldiers opposed to proposed merger of special forces: In 2013 nine emails from tillitsvalgte (soldiers elected to represent their cohorts) of Marinejegerkommandoen were not logged into the record of incoming mail at the ministry of defence.Svar til Kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen om Forsvarets spesialstyrker On 10 June 2013 she was criticised by then leader of parliament's Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs for events that happened in her area of responsibility: "It is disgusting to see that emails in an uncomfortable matter are being held away from the log of incoming mail" [at the ministry of defence]. On 11 June 2013 the Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs sent her six questions about her handling of the emails. On 12 June 2013 media said that she still had not answered (the media) if the emails had been deleted at some point. A 12 June 2013 editorial in Verdens Gang said that the emails "evidently were recovered from the trash pail on the minister's phone, tablet computer or computer". On June 17 her latest set of answers to the committee, were published.Strøm-Erichsen med flere svar om marinejegerne The latest set of answers quotes her saying "There is no connection between record keeping lacking, and that the senders of the emails were critical to the process surrounding the chief of defence's fagmilitære advice."Strøm-Erichsen avviser at hun bevisst holdt tilbake informasjon  
  
On 10 June 2013 NRK said that the minister has been "strongly criticized for not having taken seriously allegations in regards to lies, manipulation and threats of phone tapping by the highest echelons of Norway's military, related to the proposal of moving Marinejegerkommandoen from Ramsund and Bergen to Rena". (On 5 June 2013 Bergens Tidende said that Karl Egil Hanevik, chief of Norwegian Special Operation CommandSpesialstyrke-sjef utnevnt i dag has been accused of threatening soldiers in regards to future wire tapping of their phone conversations.Spesialstyrkesjef sentral i varslingssaken)"
*I agree that a mention of this case seems warranted. However, it's important to avoid undue weight; a Biography of a Living Person must be balanced at all times.  "Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects at all times." Since the article is fairly short, there shouldn't be more than a brief mention of the case. Alternatively there must be a general expansion of the article covering several sides of her career, which would give room for more coverage also of the e-mail case. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leader of parliament's Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs criticism being removed
Talk:Kentucky School for the Deaf

message: Didn't the American School for the Deaf become state supported in 1819?  --Geofferic (talk) 18:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boys of Summer (The Wire)

message: This SURELY doesn't belong on the main page, but I just wanted to give a shout-out to the other extras I worked with on this episode - your friendly WP editor Alvis is the torso in the blue shirt holding the can of spray adhesive 14 seconds into the pre-credits sequence.  For any The Wire fans, the local hardware store the interiors of the scene were filmed at is at .  Alvis 06:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cameo
Talk:MDR-TB

message: All this information is already discussed in detail in the article Tuberculosis treatment.  The term MDR = "multipledrug-resistance" which refers to the difficulty in treating this organism, it seems appropriate therefore to re-direct this to the article on treatment which already covers the subject in depth.--Gak 19:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiping MDR-TB 

message: The section in tuberculosis treatment is actually pretty big.  Another option would be to move that to this heading? Suggestions? --Gak 19:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article?
Talk:Maxime, McDuff & McDo

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rhythmnation2004

message: Username	Rhythmnation2004
Total edits	622
Distinct pages edited	161
Average edits/page	3.863
First edit	04:00, 31 December 2005
	
(main)	501
Talk	6
User	31
User talk	14
Image	56
Wikipedia	14
Rhythmnation2004's edit count using Interiot's tool as of 20:23, September 20 2006. (aeropagitica) 19:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:GA16DE

message: I had to edit much of this article. I left its integrity intact and didn't change any of the facts, but I just could not stand how it seemed to have been written by a first grader. Before my changes this article read like crap, with numerous grammatical errors and very broad statements. 
Here are some examples of what I changed...
"...and 16valve configuration power..." Was changed to... "... and 16 valve configuration. Power..."
"...better cams..." Was changed to... "...more aggressive cams..."
"...sparky performance..." Was changed to... "...decent performance..."
I feel my changes are a vast improvement over the original. I think there needs to be much more statistical content added to this page, but I'll let someone else take care of that. When you really think about it, this article really shouldn't exist. Instead it should be combined with the article about the Nissan GA Series Engine, since this engine shares so much in common with all GA series engines. 
I'd also just like to add that I owned one of these engines and it was neither reliable nor "Sparky." It was an underpowered pile of junk that left all of its piston rings from cylinder 2 in the oil pan. Even when it did run well years and years before its death it couldn't even hit 60 in 9 seconds. I think the article should be changed to say what a weak, lethargic engine the GA16DE can be. I would do it but I know there are 16 year old kids who just got the GA16 engine in their 1994 Sentra and still think that the GA16DE engine is the most powerful engine to ever grace this Earth, so I'll just leave it alone. They'll see the truth one day, probably after they wreck their slow little car into a tree.....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.206.59 (talk) 23:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written by a first grader... 

message: This engine is included in the regular Nissan GA engine article, so why this here? If there is any information which is worth to retain it should be included in the main GA article. Finally, the lemma should include "Nissan" if this article shall really remain existent. --Wolle1303 (talk) 00:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You have my support for a merge.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this article ?
Talk:Katzen (performer)

message: Has Katzen ever compared herself to Stalking Cat?  Why is this reference made?  Just because someone has the same full-body theme doesn't mean they are a "version" of the other... -Etoile 00:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They ave a similar theme, their respective opinions on the matter are not quoted nor relevant to the user's associative browsing.--Procrastinating@talk2me 10:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I removed the "heavily" (modified) word. Having a large area of your body tattooed and some piercings doesn't make you "heavily modified"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.132.141.80 (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peter Morton

message: I've just finished merging in the trivia section of this article. The material there was not actually trivia! 
One comment I have about this article is there is no sourcing. I was wondering what could be done about this? - Tbsdy lives (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing - or lack of it 

message: Was Morton really a member of Phi Sigma Delta? I can't find any external reference. And there is little mention of Phi Sigma Delta, I think it became ZBT? Hammerpleasedonthurtem (talk) 12:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fraternity affiliation 

message: The article does not mention that Morton is godfather to director Matthew Vaughn and helped to finance his films: 
* 
Maybe it is too minor a detail compared to his other business ventures, but maybe it is worth mentioning. Not sure. -- 109.79.172.81 (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Godfather 

message: Why does the article make sure to not that his father is "was of Jewish descent." This feels weirdly random and not substantive to his background and feels a little too tinfoil-ly/anti-semetic for me. 174.52.161.196 (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's Ethnic Background
Talk:Anne Lennard, Countess of Sussex

message: Found mention of Charles Edward Barrett-Lennard on Lennard Island's BC Names entry.  The Charles Lennard in the article would seem to be from an earlier generation than the info on the names reference would indicate.  Wondering if this is a grandson or what other relation.Skookum1 (talk) 05:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in 1835, died in 1874.  See here.Skookum1 (talk) 08:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Charles Edward Barrett-Lennard]]?
Talk:Lipps Inc.

message: The IPA transcription was in fact wrong, so I deleted it. It should be /lɪp sɪŋk/ - I'm not sure, however, whether there's an actual difference between "lip synch" and "lipps ink". Is there an actual difference in stress?
Wathiik 19:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here in Funkytown we pronounce it the same way.Ndavidg 20:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IPA

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Taser

message: Why is "conducted energy device" in the lead capitalized? Mat333o (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conducted Energy Device 

message: The opening sentence fails to make it clear that no one, not even law enforcement officers, is allowed to use a taser unless there is an immediate threat. 132.194.13.184 (talk) 00:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentence 

message: I second that a medicine expert should bring this section in line with the scientific consensus we seem to have at Excited delirium. I've tagged the exact issue as a fringe theory being espoused here, out of line with the article so we're internally inconsistent. Widefox; talk 23:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Excited delirium syndrome
Talk:Anne Theresa Bickerton Lyons

message: I can offer at least 2 good online sources for Anne Theresa v. Würtzburg, nee Lyons:
http://www.von-wuertzburg.de/p1.htm#i223 is great for the "von Würtzburg" and Lyons line (this german page comes with lots of written sources for every person)
and
http://lyons.familytreeguide.com/tree_index.php which is the complete genealogy of the Lyons-family, starting from the oldes ancestor and going down hunderets of living people to in present time.
(sadly doesn't contain too many sources)
the best written source by far is
Wilhelm Hotzelt, Familiengeschichte der Freiherren von Würtzburg (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder & Co., GmbH, Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1931).
Since i don't know if these links are of any value for wikipedia (and also don't know how to properly add them to the article) i will just put them here into the discussion box.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.67.177.161 (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Phantom Detective

message: That is an article on the Phantom Detective? Ha! Ha! I could do better in my sleep. But not any more.
The article says: "Eventually the Thrilling Phantom became known as the Phantom Detective, perhaps to distinguish the two characters.".
AFAIK, the Phantom Detective was known within the stories as the Phantom, but most collectors use the term "Phantom Detective" because thats what the title of the mag.  I don't think this statement is accurate.  Any comments?  ---emb021.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.188.33.25 (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Did the Phantom Detective wear a mask?  I heard he only wore it on the pulp covers - that oughtta be cleared up.  (72.144.82.229 (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mask?
Talk:Peter Odemwingie

message: Odemwingie never played a striker, therefore I removed it. He mostly played an attacking midfielder, sometimes a winger, but he never was a striker. There were few times in Locomotive that he was made second striker under Sychev, but never a striker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.129.156 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position 

message: He's described as famous for "his technique, pace and girth" - girth? I'm not sure about that as a relevant description here. Girth would normally refer to someone overweight, or possibly to a porn star with a tremendous girth... I really don't think either apply, so perhaps this should be deleted? There's no citation for this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.54.82 (talk) 12:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club Career 

message: The lead and infobox say he was born in Tashkent, whereas the International section says he was born in "Sylane and came up through the Corrib Celtic youth systems"? 194.28.124.55 (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace? 
Talk:Anne Craine

message: One or two sentences in this article read as if they were written by a political supporter, rather than by the editor of an encyclopaedia. Would anyone object if I tried to amend accordingly?
45ossington (talk) 14:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Please delete any requests to Anne Craine being an MHK as she was not re-elected a the last general election. She was the first female Treasury Minister of the Isle of Man but no longer is. 
Lordofman10 (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please supply references, and re-request.  Chzz  ►  01:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 8 October 2011 

message: I propose the infobox I have created be added.  
--BV76 (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Jnorton7558 (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 2 November 2011 
Talk:G-8 (character)

message: Isn't it amazing. A few words and an index and no one says anything. I write an article, with lots of photos and an index (Secret Service Operator 5) and it turns out not to be what wikipedia wants so deletion is immediately threatened. You want crap, you get crap.
I added several G-8 cover photos to fill the big blank space on the right of the index. Now they are gone and the big empty area is back. (Cyberia3 (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anselm J. McLaurin

message: It is common, in some places, to use a footnote to add a colorful anecdote, or additional explanatory material, not fitting into the flow of the main document. That practice is generally not encouraged in Wikipedia, as far as I can tell. I posed the question here. While the full community has obviously not weighed in, the consensus appears to me that quotes should be revered for two related classes of use:
# In a case where there may be controversy about a particular fact, and whether the cited reference supports that fact, the use of the quote will make it easier for readers and editors to reach their own conclusion, by citing the specific quote used to support the fact. This is particularly important where a reference may be not online, or behind a pay wall.
# When an opinion is paraphrased, the quote will help readers and editors determine whether the paraphrase is accurate.
This article did have a quote in a footnote, and it is my opinion that the quote does not support either use listed above, thus I have removed it, or truncated it. Should anyone disagree, or feel that there are other examples of allowable quotes, feel free to start a discussion. I suggest here, if you disagree with my conclusion that this quote doesn't fall into one of those two examples, or at Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content#.22brief_verbatim_textual_excerpts.22_revisited if you feel there should be other allowed uses.SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You say, "thus I have removed it, or truncated it."  Did you not know when you posted whether you were going to remove it or truncate it?  As for the statement above, "the consensus appears to me...", just how did you weigh into the "consensus" the statement at WP:NFC, "...but totally removing the quote is IMO vandalism."  What is the relationship between this 1908 newspaper quote and WP:NFC, is it not the case that this newspaper quote is now in the public domain?  What is your analysis of the statement at WP:NFC in relationship to this article's quote, "If an editor doesn't like the length of a quote, he/she should consider reducing its length..."?  Also, please note that the section here that your comment refers to as "a footnote" is called "References".  Editors have commented at WP:NFC about the benefit of protecting against dead links.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:09, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Responded on your talk page.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote in footnote removed 

message: Since Anslem McLurin was Robin Williams' great grandfather and since McLaurin was his middle name, Williams belongs as a category!--24.186.96.236 (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin Williams