Talk:TCG Muavenet (DM 357)

message: Did the USA give a new replacement ship to the turkish as reparation? I heard the turkish ship was so badly damaged it had to be dismantled. 82.131.210.162 11:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did America take responsibility? 

message: I was a crewchief on a Ch-46E. It was our task that day to take the Color Gaurd, and the five caskets into Ankara. We had to stop on the Saratoga on the return trip to fuel up as our ship was further off the coast. While on deck fueling, the tower asked if we would take a patient, whos condition was upgraded to critical, to Ankara. We were told if he remained aboard ship that there would be nothing they could do, he needed to be taken to a real hospital. As we were onloading, I had to use safety wire to keep the plasma and other I.V's to the airframe. The Turkish sailor was as we were told, was in very bad shape. As we landed in Ankara, the Turks were not ready for us. We were instanly surrounded, with rifles, machineguns, and tanks all pointing their weapons at us. As I finally explained that the wounded I had aboard, was one of their own, an ambulance was backed up to my helocopter and the Turkish sailor was loaded up and the Navy Doctor as well got into the Turkish ambulance, and drove away. My pilots were not very pleased that I let the Navy doctor go with the patient. It happened so fast, I had nothing. There is a lot more to the story that I have decided to omit here, for obvious reasons. And to this day I do not know if the Turkish sailor lived or died. I would appreciate any info if anyone could help. As I said this day changed my life
               Joe TJoeShort (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  That day changed my life, as well as those around me. 

message: An image used in this article, File:Muave1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Muave1.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Muave1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Was a full investigation carried out? I would be interested to know why supposedly supervising officers ignored "two separate requests from the missile system operator to clarify whether the launch order was an exercise", and why anyone was going through a drill or exercise which involved an anti-aircraft missile being fired (whether for real or as a simulation) against a NATO warship. I would have thought that the operator should have declined to fire such a missile at a very real and friendly ship. Even if he thought it was a real (if strange) order, it was clearly an illegal one.Royalcourtier (talk) 04:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Investigation 

message: This article is not about the ship - that article, in fact, exists at  - but about the 1992 incident. Now, the inicident clearly meets all the relevant standards for notability and should have an article. But, as that's this article, which is currently titled as being about the ship, the page should be clarified and moved, with its current title becoming a redirect to Gwins article, which would then have a  link in the Muavenet section to 1992 TCG Muavenet incident (working title). Thoughts? - The Bushranger One ping only 06:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs retitling?