lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Uniklinikum Aachen

message: Having lived in Aachen for a time, I heard (not read) that the "towers" protruding from the building are elevator shafts. These were constructed ahead of time in anticipation of a taller building, but as the article says these additional stories were never built.
If this is accurate, it could be mentioned in this article (since the shafts are a very distinguishing feature of the building). But it's hearsay to me, so I'm putting it here as a comment, pending other sources.
The floors had in the Beginning different names; U was -1 and -2; but they changed it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.89.71.151 (talk) 13:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevator shafts

message: Perhaps it is out of place to say so, but this must be ugliest building in the world. Surely, Charlemagne's capital deserved better! In any case, what I think is important to know is whether the project would have been smaller horizontally if all the floors had been built according to the original design.
Wfgiuliano (talk) 03:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Original design

message: As far as I know (I live in Aachen for several years now) the missing floors and the moving of the building are urban legends. 
The building looks like that, because is is an example of the "technische Moderne" architecture style(don't know the english term).
Because of that, the building is under cultural heritage management since late 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.130.4.243 (talk) 18:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban legend 
Talk:Rīgas Vagonbūves Rūpnīca

message: The plant was bankrupt in 2017 and now closed.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.173.131 (talk) 10:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated article 
Category talk:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed

message: Why does this category need to exist? —ScouterSig 17:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So the bot can work properly. It looks in this category for non-talk pages it's supposed to work on. See the description at User:SineBot. - dcljr (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Talk:Florida Department of Environmental Protection

message: agree with 's merge proposal (from 2013) to merge the unreferenced stub Bureau of Park Patrol that has no stand alone quality with this site.--Wuerzele (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge discussion 

message: I'm following this subject and suggest the inclusion of a sub-section for the 4/25/21 Piney Point Incident, and a mention of the incident on the History sub-section. Supporting points:
* The incident is a current event addressing an environmental crisis that the FDEP website has listed as their top priority. https://protectingfloridatogether.gov/PineyPointUpdate
* Governor DeSantis has declared a state of emergency due to the contamination leak discovery, and HRK, the embattled holding company that owns the site is alleged to be ultimately responsible. 
I've already suggested same-topic edits for the Piney Point Phosphate Plant article, which has a sub-section for the incident. Xin Jing (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piney Point Incident 

message: Crime 🎤 microphone being used against citizen help Report location Dayton Ohio to traveler State of Florida 70.60.56.30 (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disturbed usage of microphone 🎤 that is being used for stalking
Talk:Curtiss-Wright AT-9 Jeep

message: Do we know the exact date of first flight? Drutt (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First flight
Talk:Toby Tolliver

message: Toby Tolliver is not an actor, but rather, the character played by a variety of actors.  This is a topic worthy of the encyclopedia, but the tone needs to be made more encyclopedic and less of a tribute. Joe 22:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article really needs a complete rewrite. Unless this material can be put in quotes with citations, almost none of it is usable here. Beyond me to cope with at this point. I did change the first para to say he's a character, not an actor. Sylvia A (talk) 02:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Angel Guts

message: Citations aren't an issue here, so I will focus on copy editing. --Soulparadox 21:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's always shocking how much misinformation you can find on the English (or any) Wikipedia when you're researching about Japanese cinema. Especially when everything you need to know is just one click away, in this case on the Japanese Wikipedia, which states that "Yoru ga mata kuru" isn't part of this series but one of many films to feature the recurring character of Tsuchiya Nami. The films aren't really connected in any way, Nami is just some kind of recurring character in the fictional universe of Ishii Takashi and his friends. So you could equally list Evil Dead Trap or Gonin as parts of Angel Guts. But is it too much to ask to just translate the information found on the Japanese page? I won't do it since my English sucks, but come on, someone. --Laughing Vampire (talk) 04:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely wrong article
Talk:The Royal Court

message: They are producing hits for some of the biggest names in music such as Omarion and Mario and Ashlee Simpson. They are an up and coming who have already received credits on singles by major artists. They had a major hit with the song Icebox. Anonymous received consistent video play on MTV and such. "Cut Off Time" is being featured on the commercials for "Bring the Noise." And these are just to name a few. They have worked closely with Justin Timberlake and Timbaland in the production studios. This entry references sites such as MTV.com that reference them. This is a legitimate entry, and I don't understand the rapid deletion tag.
70.149.123.230 23:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have asserted no reason that "The Royal Court" is important. You have references for each member, but not for the group.Kww 23:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at WP:MUSIC. If they pass one of those tests, and you can show a reliable source (not MySpace or YouTube, but a WP:RS) that shows that they pass, it would be fine.Kww 23:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

text: They don't apply to this page, because they make no mention of a grouping named "The Royal Court."Kww 00:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

text: First, please remember that I'm just another editor ... I can't give permission, just opinions. The rollingout.com article is a good step towards a reference for "The Royal Court" article, and you should put it in there. The description mentioning them isn't a great reference, but it helps. Blogs don't count as sources, because they are too easy to forge.
I think you stand a good chance with the other articles. Just remember to put in references!Kww 12:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carlo Frigerio

message: Article on Carlo Frigerio is found on page 158, not 159, of the cited source.
CARAVAGGISTI 23:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't prod this - perfectly notable painter, though article should be a bit assertive on this. Johnbod 23:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rosewood Center

message: According to an article on Slate.com, a lawyer named Harry B. Wolf ran a racket of selling patients to wealthy Baltimore women to serve as housemaids. Perhaps someone with more skill could add that to this article? See: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2014/03/baltimore_s_rosewood_scandal_wealthy_families_sprang_asylum_inmates_to_be.html 65.103.54.234 (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wanted to ask the same question, but see that it has been asked before, but not answered. Debresser (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavery 

message: Why doesn't this article mention that the Rosewood Center is the stage for the 2017 film "The Institute"? Debresser (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film
Talk:Conductive textile

message: Do we need so many citations? Biscuittin 23:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold!. I simply removed all the references. They clearly don't add any value at all to this article, and it's actually better and less confusing without them. vidarlo 01:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

message: I think portions of Smart textiles should be merged here, and part elsewhere. - PKM (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:HMAS Canberra

message: This looks straightforward to me. Four belong to one ship, one to another. I've never seen them lumped together like this on any any non-Australian ship set index. Nothing in Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines#Index pages even hints that this is recommended. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this appears to be standard for other pages, I'm going to transfer this to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines#Battle honours in set index pages? for a wider audience. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle Honours
Talk:Planter

message: I saw the discussion about slaveholder as a category and the decision to delete it as a category. 
I think it makes more sense to create a category for "planter", as defined by historians for the United States - one who owned 20 or more slaves.  This term has been a means by which historians define wealth and political and social class in the antebellum South. I've seen this number and term referred to in most mid-late 20th c. academic writing about slavery and the planter class, but don't know precisely when historians came to that consensus. Whites who were planters were a distinct minority in the population, but they held most of the political and social power in the South. Because of the 3/5 rule to count slave population toward Southern states' Congressional representation, planters also held a disproportionate share of power at the national level.  --Parkwells 23:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Planter Class

message: There is a reference to a planter being a "protestant colonizer". I'm wondering if this is in reference to Ireland and if anyone knows enough to create and article for the planter irish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alleyward (talk • contribs) 23:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: There is a discussion at Talk:Planters#Requested move 17 February 2020 about moving an article about a company and redirecting the plural here. Crouch, Swale (talk)  21:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Planters"
Talk:Masahisa Fukase

message: Actually it's Kintetsubuffalo who requested the image. 
Unsurprisingly, FIST brings nothing. Fukase's photographs will be (conventionally) copyright, and as yet the article contains no critical discussion for which (conventionally) copyright images could be "fairly used". -- Hoary (talk) 09:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for images
Talk:HMAS Stuart

message: I've tagged the reason for naming the ships HMAS Stuart for the explorer John McDouall Stuart as being dubious. According to The Destroyers, by Vic Cassells, the first Stuart was named for the Scottish House of Stuart (p. 106). He implies (but does not state either way) that the other Stuarts was called so to perpetuate the name. The second Stuart may have been named after a Stuart or Stewart River, as the rest of the class are named after rivers. Does anyone have any sources saying more clearly? -- saberwyn 11:52, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With no response in over a year and a half, I've stripped the claim out completely. -- saberwyn 09:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Metropolis Collectibles

message: Easily, see here:
Google archive. Ongoing, constant little news hits. This article just needs a big cleanup. • Lawrence Cohen 23:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 

message: Resource #2 is now a 404 page.  I don't know how to track down corroborating sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManiacDan (talk • contribs) 13:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 
Talk:NC Live

message: NC LIVE should not be deleted due to the copyright restrictions mentioned since I am a nine year employee of NC LIVE and the author of the material I used for the Wikipedia page.  Ncliveguy 23:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is unreferenced.  Until references are added, please do not remove the tag. -- Whpq 16:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unref

message: The article is not formatted per the wikiepdia Manual of Style.  Please do not remove until this has ben properly formatted. -- Whpq 16:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify

message: The entirety of the material comes from those involved in NC Live, and really needs a review and copyedit of the material to bring it in line with an encyclopedia article. -- Whpq 16:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Talk:Hideki Fujii

message: Any info./sources on how he died...that could be put in article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minusminority (talk • contribs) 10:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Vincenzo Vinciguerra

message: If I'm not mistaken, several charges Casson laid at SISMI officers were later thrown out. A different judge (Giudiceandrea) investigated possible criminal issues surrounding Gladio, but I cannot find any sources describing the result of these investigations. Intangible2.0 23:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The connection to Gladio and C4 explosives is contradicted by the court proceedings, which the article in La Repubblica (note 3) links to. Ganser is probably wrong here.
Agnerf (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: No connection to Gladio

message: As I understand it, the key element to this story is that the 1972 bombing was originally blamed on the Red Brigade in order to discredit them. Everyone accepted this, and the story went cold for years. Then one magistrate digs to the bottom and exposes the lie. It's a great story, which is entirely missing from this article. Nevertheless, it does mention the outcome, but not the events that led to it! Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large parts missing? 
Talk:Battleground 3: Waterloo

message: Why is this game released on May 23, 1996, and Battleground 4: Shiloh on January 31, 1996 (i.e. sooner)? Battleground 4 can't be released before Battleground 3. Аргскригициониец (talk) 10:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date is incorrect
Talk:Silver Lake (investment firm)

message: To be completely transparent, I work at Silver Lake. I chose this username so that my affiliation with my firm is clear and consistent per guidelines on use of company names. I have noticed several places where information about Silver Lake is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date, and would like to help by providing resources to update Silver Lake’s Wikipedia page. Out of respect for guidelines on conflict-of-interest editing and the importance of a neutral point of view, my intent is to engage here, on the Talk page.
 
In the page’s infobox, it omits “Key People” which is a standard entry on many other Wikipedia pages of private equity firms.
 
Silver Lake’s key people today are different from its founders, who are mostly unconnected to the firm’s current operations. Silver Lake’s key people are Jim Davidson, Egon Durban, Mike Bingle, Ken Hao and Greg Mondre, all of whom hold the title Managing Partner.
 
Can we update this information on the Wikipedia page? The source for this information can be found on the firm website under “Team” as well as third party news sources like this article from Bloomberg News. If I can provide any further explanation of the changes outlined above, please do not hesitate to ask. Thanks. Gordon.SilverLake (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction and Incomplete Information 

message: who is "Silver Lake Management LLC". aka for "Silver Lake Partners"? wholly owned subsidiary? other?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.86.236.127 (talk) 12:51, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  question
Talk:A Spirit of Tolerance

message: I was asked by emiail:
"You put up a proposed deletion for the page of the book about Tierno Bokar, "A Spirit of Tolerance: The Inspiring Life of Tierno Bokar".  I was wondering why?  Tierno Bokar is a person of obvious significance; books and plays have been written about his life.  The page I put up is about the *only* English-language translation of the well-known book about his life.  It was this book that brought him to the attention of the Western world, without it his fame would not be what it is.
> 
> What do I need to do to establish its notability?  How is this book less notable than (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dateline:_Troy) or (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy%27s_Eyes)?  I ask this sincerely; I believe this book is of importance and I want to know what I should do to help it fit Wikipedia standards.  Thank you for your help,"
and I replied
I think the man is important.  His importance is shown by the work he has done, and proven by the fact that books are written about him. To show the book is notable, you need to show that it is notable independently--that it has in in own right won an important award or become a notable best seller. 
There is another route--to change the article to a redirect, so those who look up the title will be automatically transferred to the article on Bokar. 
I'm known around wikipedia as an inclusionist. I want an article about everything important. One article. The individual biographies of Darwin ,or Marx, or for that matter Mohammed, do not have individual articles in WP. Perhaps some of them should--there are some that have won major literary and historical awards. Can one say the same about this.?  DGG (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Given that the book pertains to three separate people - Tierno Bokar about whom the book was written, Amadou Hampate Ba who wrote it, and Peter Brook who adapted the book into a play - I don't think it makes sense to absorb the information about the book into any one page. Therefore, I removed the deletion notice before the page was automatically deleted. Temp07 21:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Deletion Notice
Talk:First Love Limited

message: This page was just run through a translator.  Can someone actually translate this? Yanra36 17:34, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: I don't think the harem genre is appropriate for this particular comic, since most relationships taking place is on a person-by-person basis - it'd be like calling School Rumble a harem. I'm changing it to "romantic comedy". --Sqrfrk (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harem genre? 

message: Someone put a  tag on List of Hatsukoi Limited chapters, but forgot to add the  on this one, and to start the conversation. So -- proposal's on the table.
Personally, I agree -- the list of chapters isn't so long that it can't fit here, and it would add non-plot content to the article. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's another vote for a merge. Since the list of chapters doesn't span longer than a page. --Animeronin (talk) 12:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Since no more chapters/volumes are being put out, and there are only four of them, I see no reason not to merge it at this point.Silent Firefox (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In that case, unless no one else objects, I'll do the deed some time this weekend. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Nazi exploitation

message: Is the writer implying that some of this fiction has made it into the history books relating to the Holocaust?
--The preceding unsigned comment was added to by 206.255.67.97 at 00:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Books? Yes, including many bestsellers. History of the Holocaust, no.
___________________________________________________________________
Until such time as some form of AUTHENTIC SUBSTANTIATING REFERENCE can be provided this and the Naziploitation section are serving only to support the misinformed.
[insert group]loitation films are essentially a commercial exploitation of the celebration of newfound status amongst previously repressed minorities - henge blacksploitation, gaysploitation et al. To start merging the suffix with the term for a group who actively practiced slaughter of humankind based on a philosophical prejudice is not merely reprehensible but also invalid in terms of film theory.
210.10.134.12 (talk) 11:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Doesn't this count as Nazi glorification? Also, why would anyone who isn't a neo Nazi want to watch porn about people who are widely known as taboo?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamcool34234 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Glorification
Talk:Redcliffe Peninsula

message: I am bothered that we have an article title with the word "City" when it isn't a city any more. The lead sentence also talks about a "municipality" which it isn't any more. The hat notes suggest this article is about the Redcliffe Peninsula. If so, shouldn't we call it that? Interested in other people's feedback. Kerry (talk) 01:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, after 3 years of no feedback, I guess I can rename it. Kerry (talk) 00:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

text: Sorry, my mistake. I switched it back. Kerry (talk) 07:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  article title and lead sentence
Talk:Back on Top (song)

message: Why is this song notable? Cloonmore (talk) 03:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This songs notability is apparent to anyone who looks at the song article.  There is no need to defend it and argue over it.  There are too many other things to do on Wikipedia - like WORK for instance. Agadant (talk) 04:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:List of Where's Wally? episodes

message: All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only have certain bad aspects (though all may not apply) like containing overly long or one sentence plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list. 
If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. Otherwise, discussion will take place here. Please remember that this is not a vote. If you like the information, that's fine and dandy, but your opinion doesn't really count towards anything. The only opinions that do count are ones that that lean towards the inclusion of real world information. TTN 01:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode notability