lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Left Democratic Front

message: A source on membership would be needed. These edits contained some errors. CPI(Maoist) is obviously not a member of the Front. The Forward Bloc is not a member (at least so was the situation in 2006). INL is not a member, but a close ally. Groups like PDP have vacillating relation to LDF, sometimes allies sometimes not. --Soman (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members 

message: Some references are added to reflect the scenario of 2011. The details given were obsolete. And the "Unreferenced" tag is removed from the page. -- Aqueousmatt (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: Hi , see the articles of United Progressive Alliance and National Democratic Alliance. Incidents about particular parties don't belong here. The content you added is most likely criticism of political parties including the RSS. This belongs to the pages of the respective articles if it's due. Also please see WP:NOTNEWS. SUN EYE 1 10:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political activism 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. NO objections, and page views suggest it's a correct primary topic.   — Amakuru (talk) 22:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 November 2021
Talk:Lok Shakti

message: Was the Lok Shakti daily newspaper published by Lok Shakti, the political organization? There's mention of this newsletter as part of Shankar Dattatraya Javdekar's article but I don't know if the two Lok Shakti are related to the point that we can add a section about the newsletter to this article and to x-wikilink with Javdekar's article. --Marc Kupper|talk 19:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lok Shakti daily 
Talk:Chhotanagpur Front

message: I realise that the freshly inserted references are whole books, whose abstracts give no clue whatsoever to the importance or notability of this splinter group. There needs to be some assertion as to this group's electoral success or other ability to influence the polity, as there is none in the article at present. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy
Talk:Chhotanagpur Plateau Praja Parishad

message: I realise that the freshly inserted references are whole books, whose abstracts give no clue whatsoever to the importance or notability of this splinter group. There needs to be some assertion as to this group's electoral success or other ability to influence the polity, as there is none in the article at present. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Refs have page number, and 2 out of 3 are avaible for preview at google books. Note that in total 17 books at google books, . Not to bad for an org that collapsed long before the dawn of the world wide web. --Soman (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested speedy
Talk:Congress Socialist Party

message: mentions that two South Indian state CSP branches were taken over by communists, and left the CSP in 1940. One was definately Kerala, but was the other AP? Any source? --Soman (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communist-controlled CSP units 
Talk:National Loktantrik Party

message: "The building of a temple to ram"
I sent ram to rama.
If this isnt correct please fix it.
Bearingbreaker92 01:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ram disamb change

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Lok Janshakti Party

message: The parliamentary party of LJP on 14th June removed Chirag Paswan as the parliamentary party head and party president.
 On 15th, national executive committee of the party, expelled the 5 MPs who decided to remove Chirag Paswan, automatically making the remaining MP Chirag Paswan the parliamentary party head. They also affirmed that Chirag Paswan remains the President of the party.
At present, we stick to the what the national executive has declared. Should the 5 MPs expelled, organize their organization, led by the President of their choice, we will make a page on that party. Teerthaloke102 (talk) 16:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  LJP conflict 

message: According to Lok Janshakti Party constitution Chirag paswan is the president of the party and his review petition is still pending before Speaker. Nitinbajpai08 (talk) 08:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:47, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2021 

message: Adding official website of lok janshakti party UNRIVALLEDKING (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2023 

message: People are supreme in a democracy, Paswan said and thanked those who have kept faith in the party.
Paswan also shared a letter he had written to Paras, the youngest brother of his father, in March in which he had highlighted his uncle's unhappiness over a number of issues, including his elevation as the party president.
: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath
Talk:Krishak Praja Party

message: I suspect this article should be merged with Praja Party - there seems to be confusion around the names, but as I understand it, the KPP was simply a later name for Praja. I will suggest it on both articles. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Praja Party?
Talk:Krantikari Mukti Morcha

message: I realise that the freshly inserted references are whole books, whose abstracts give no clue whatsoever to the importance or notability of this splinter group. There needs to be some assertion as to this group's electoral success or other ability to influence the polity, as there is none in the article at present. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy
Talk:Kerala Congress

message: Current Kerala Congress have only the name. Current Kerala Congress led by P.J. Joseph is split from Kerala Congress (1964). Kerala Congress (1964) is split in two 2 parties Mani group named Kerala Congress (Mani) and Joseph Group named Kerala Congress. So this party is not existing. Shaheed Hemukalani (talk) 07:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kerala Congress (1964) is a Defunct Party
Template talk:Plural

message: I have fixed this template to correctly handle all plurals, even "ox/oxen". Anomie 19:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old discussion 

message: Please make this edit to allow the template to give the expected output when substed. Anomie⚔ 17:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: done —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safesubst 

message: {
"description": "Provides the appropriate singular or plural form of a noun preceded by a number",
"params": {
  "1": {
    "label": "Number",
    "description": "A non-negative number",
    "type": "number",
    "required": true
  },
  "2": {
    "label": "Name",
    "description": "A singular noun",
    "type": "string",
    "required": true
  },
  "3": {
    "label": "Name (plural)",
    "description": "Plural form of Name (not needed if the plural is formed by adding -s)",
    "type": "string",
    "required": false
  }
}}
ℜob C. alias ÀLAROB 00:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  is usually not required for edits to the documentation, categories, or interlanguage links of templates using a documentation subpage. Use the 'edit' link at the top of the green "Template documentation" box to edit the documentation subpage. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 1 July 2013: add TemplateData for Visual Editor 

message: I am requesting that this template be updated to allow the option of using a non-breaking space between the number and the text (in place of the current breaking space). The updated code can be found in Template:Plural/sandbox. The following shows an example of how it would work (the output was placed inside a narrow  to force a line break).
Example                                     	Current output	Sandbox output
Non-breaking space:  	              	
Breaking space (default): 	              	
Additional examples can be found at Template:Plural/testcases.
-- Zyxw (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Except I used  so  will do what the user probably expects. Anomie⚔ 02:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the quick response and also for adding nb=no to the test cases. -- Zyxw (talk) 04:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 30 September 2013
Talk:Janata Party

message: I propose to merge Indian National Congress (Organisation) and Bharatiya Lok Dal to history section of this page since they are merely single paragraphs. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 01:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A merger for the BLD page might be appropriate, though it is arguably a distinct topic. INC (O) should probably be merged to the main INC page, not here... Vanamonde (talk) 12:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Is the abbreviation JP or JNP? — DaxServer (talk) 16:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In 1980 , 1985 general elections, official website of Election Commission of India was using JNP for Janata Party. But from 1991 general election, JP was used. In 2004 election, JP was used.Dshrm (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviation
Talk:Ahrn Palley

message: David, not a bad effort for someone born in Leeds in 1972. Shows real professional talent. Bob BScar23625 19:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! He seemed like an interesting character, and fitted in with the Rhodesian elections articles I'm working on. David | Talk 21:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Have a look at the  template. I've written most of the blue links. David | Talk 10:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Background
Talk:Visual DialogScript

message: I have been using VDS for over 15 years (since version 2.0) and continue to use it to this day. I am the IT Administrator for an insurance company and the lead developer of InsureSign digital document signing software . I am also the developer of Paste As File a popular utility for Windows . VDS is a great language and can be used to make great applications. I will continue to use it as long as it can run on Windows. - Chris Gingerich  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.204.229 (talk) 21:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Janata Dal

message: There is nothing in this text about the overall politics or ideology of the party. Even if it was a loose coalition, it must have had some common ideas? Not Really Great (talk) 06:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics? Ideology? 

message: Laloo Prasad Yadav isn't a present leader of Janta Dal. He founded his own party Rashtriya Janata Dal.
Pops7003 (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaders 

message: Can someone please rewrite the section, or at least explain what Rath Yatra means?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.137.217 (talk) 16:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Janata Dal (Secular)

message: I dont think most of the information on this page is accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgkprog (talk • contribs) 22:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be updated at least once a month 

message: Other than "left" and secular, this article gives no indication about the JDS position on any political issue.  There should be a summary of the party's platform. M Carling 12:52, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform / Ideology 
Talk:Janata Dal (United)

message: I archived various sources recently; the source 33 was not archived, because of dead link or other reason.Can someone fix it? -Admantine123 (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not finding it either. What I suggest you do in cases like this is go to the Nitish Kumar page and use one of the sources there, if it's still any good, even if it's not exactly the same article that was once used on this page. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 23:53, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:   - usually, it's best to use the  template on your own user talk page. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding source 33 

message: JD(U) is a socialist party and socialism is a Left wing ideology. Big 14 (talk) 05:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Then better provide reliable sources. Read WP:RS and WP:V. Thanks--103.161.57.249 (talk) 05:55, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the Britannica source mention RJD or JDU name?--103.161.57.249 (talk) 06:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding political position 

message: Jdu's ideology should be socialism and party colour should be green and white 45.127.138.76 (talk) 04:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jdu's ideology should be socialism and party colour should be green and white 

message: What about Ramakrishna Hegde? Was he not a part of it? 🤔 Kpbolumbu (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Ramakrishna Hegde?
Talk:Indian Congress (Socialist)

message: 1978-80 was a confusing time, but not all members of the congress (U) went into the Congress (S). Jagjivan Ram was part of urs' party, and he split away first; YB Chavan left the party, anticipating a return to the Congress (I). The Congress (U) deserves its own page as the first proto-Third Front type thing, an national alliance of pure regional leaders. The rump of the Congress (U) did in fact become the Congress (S), but after its ranks were decimated and Sharad Pawar assumed command. Hornplease 00:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've answered this issue at Talk:Indian National Congress (Urs). --Soman 08:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Congress (S) shenanigans

message: The party of Kadannappally Ramachandran would need a separate article. --Soman (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Kerala Congress (S)
Talk:Kuch Naa Kaho

message: Why the hell is the plot being spoiled?  EVEN THE ENDING?!
:Well, we're an encyclopedia, not a film magazine. But the plot is too much considering the article has no critical analysis, no ticket sales information etc. I tried to reduce it, but I didn't know what else to cut. When nearly the only thing in the article is plot summary, three paragraphs skirts copyright violation. - Taxman Talk 03:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:All India Forward Bloc (Subhasist)

message: Are we sure these are the same parties? One group founded in 1960s and a party existing in 1990s/2000s, isn't it possible that they are two different groups with similar names? --Soman (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged the articles, as I think they are the same; Refs are not easy to come by. Lynch7 07:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Maite Perroni

message: Nonstandard citation method used along with unsourced edits taking place in this article. It may be necessary to check all the references and add a reimprove tag. --Ronbo76 (talk) 15:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup added

message: Most times Youtube is not a reliable source. This is a tricky one as the alleged video is probably not copyrighted but still presents an issue in a WP:BLP article. I thought about editting that line and reference out but wanted some WP:CONSENSUS. What do other editors think? --Morenooso (talk) 16:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation using youtube

message: No citation was given to support that claim. I have read that it had reasonable good rating, though after a religious protest in Mexico against portraying a priest in a romance, the plot was changed (ruined in the opinion of some).  CDC was a comedy about a futbol player who returned from the dead as a priest imposter, in which role he sought his novia, Maite Perroni.  Ornery angels kept butting into his life, but eventually they were sent to Hell, and the plot changed from a comedy to a really negative story about evil persons doing evil.  But the story continued to a rational ending -- it was not suddenly just pulled, though perhaps it would have lasted longer if they had let the original plot play out.  Some will say that 110 episodes is long enough for a telenovela.  (PeacePeace (talk) 00:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Claim that Cachito DC was pulled for low ratings. 
Talk:Variraptor

message: This section of text appeared today.  I haven't seen recent indications that Variraptor and Pyroraptor are the same things (V in particular is problematic, as Dinosaur Mailing List discussions have questioned its identity as a dromaeosaurid as well as its validity). The last sentence at any rate does not make sense.
cut text:
Variraptor seems to have been a close relative of Pyroraptor olympius which, interestingly, also lived in France. Some paleontologists have suggested that Pyroraptor and Variraptor are the same, with Variraptor having precedence, but Pyroraptor, having been on Discovery Channel's Dinosaur Planet and numerous other recreations of prehistoric Europe, is more famous than its relative. Varriraptor and Pyroraptor probably aren't the same, considering the fact that if they were, only one dromaeosaur would ever have lived in Europe. 
J. Spencer (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the very least, the last sentence is incorrect: I doubt anyone has stated that the lack of current evidence of a second genus means that "only one dromaeosaur would ever have lived" there. Firsfron of Ronchester 19:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article
Talk:Dupatta

message: I will like to redirect all reuests that look for word chunri or chunni. Both words are basically synonyms for dupatta. I am an Indian and any one can contact me for clarification on this topic.
Kumar 19:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: How similar is a dupatta to an ajrak? Should these articles be merged or cross-referenced?—C45207 | Talk 01:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to [[Ajrak]] 

message: It is confusing and mixing-up the concept of Ajrak and Dupatta. Alixafar (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I suggest to remove Priest King's image 

message: — Assignment last updated by Gurnaaz11 (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Community Economic and Social Development II
Talk:Praja Socialist Party

message: Does the new (or renewed) party in Kerala share any organizational links with the older party, or just use the same name? Does it include any of the same personnel or use the same manifesto? If not, perhaps it should be in its own article, linked to this one with a "see also". Q·L·1968 ☿ 18:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Same as older party?
Talk:Theakston Brewery

message: History SilkTork 19:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit History

message: If anyone on this page knows of the popular Youtube channel known as Bluexephos (I doubt it very much) there is a recurring character on their series known as 'old peculiar'. Perhaps someone could mention this in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry McThompson (talk • contribs) 21:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yogscast 

message: The statement "Only two of the beers are filtered and pasteurised to be made available in bottles, Theakston XB and Old Peculier" is certainly incorrect, as I am drinking bottled "Masham Glory" (a beer not even mentioned in th4e article) even as i type this - purchased in Hong Kong.  The shop where I bought it had a couple of other Theakston brews in bottles, but I didn't note which ones.  Masham Glory is one of several bottled beers shown under "Shop" on the brewery's website https://www.theakstons.co.uk/Shop/, so clearly they don't only bottle the 2 brews mentioned.  Can someone please update this?
Rodparkes (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information on Bottled Beers

message: I may be drinking Old Peculier (I AM drinking Old Peculier), but I can only count five seasonal ales where it says six. Can anyone see six? Peridon (talk) 21:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out for the count? 
Talk:Aslackby Preceptory

message: Would you explain what you have in mind, please. (RJP 19:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There having been no response, I have taken the tag out because although the article itself may not explain every aspect of the subject, the links go a good way toards this. (RJP 20:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: insufficient context

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Aslackby Preceptory (Temple Farmhouse)
52.8595
-0.3878
—Tyssil (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks as though you've emended the coordinates yourself. I've done some cleanup. Deor (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Template talk:Citroën

message: PrinceGloria, you reverted my conversion of this template to use the navbox meta-template with the edit summary of "ummm no - this doesn't look too good...". Could you be more specific? The navbox meta-template is a Wikipedia-wide standard that's becoming extremely widespread, having this template stick with the current ad-hoc layout will make it stick out and be hard to maintain. Bryan Derksen 01:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see what's hard to maintain with this template, it's been serving us well. The "unified" design is hardly good-looking - this one is light, easy to read and elegant. I don't see the need to change that. PrinceGloria 06:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Navbox template

message: IMVHO three ages should be considered for Historic models.
The Citroen-Era, when the car maker was "alone" by itself or paired with Maserati
The PSA-Era, when the company is part of Peugeot Societè Anonyme (and most model are badge engineers of Peugeot onese)
The Stellantis-Era, when PSA is part of one of the biggest trans-atlantic car group.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.162.194.86 (talk) 23:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ages of Citroen