lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Domain-specific modeling

message: Does anyone else see a connection between DSM and "Little Languages"/DSL? What I mean is that if you have a high-level functional and/or declarative "Little Language", and you then create a tool that visualizes and allows modification of its Abstract Syntax Tree, would you then have a DSM-tool? Avl 10:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see an analogy between Model-Driven Software Engineering and common uses of, for example, yacc. -- RLV 151.190.254.108 (talk) 10:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SM and "Little Languages"/DSL 
Talk:Robert Swinhoe

message: Charles Swinhoe (1836-1923) and Robert Swinhoe (1836-1877), brothers ? Impossible ! Because Robert borned the 1th September 1836 and Charles 29th August 1836 !!! 
Is it a mystery of human reproduction ?--Valérie75 09:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brothers ? 

message: The "The Published Writings of Robert Swinhoe" external link is broken.
134.10.133.54 (talk) 05:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 
Talk:École centrale de Lyon

message: I just edited the article to make usage within the article consistent with the title which was "École centrale de Lyon" as I made my edits. I see that the most recent renaming was done by someone who has since been blocked for sockpupettry. If the consensus is that the name should return to "École Centrale de Lyon" with the capital C, I'd be happy to go back and change the usage in the article. Thank you. SchreiberBike talk 23:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper or lowercase
Talk:Charles Swinhoe

message: Charles Swinhoe (1836-1923) and Robert Swinhoe (1836-1877), brothers ? Impossible ! Because Robert borned the 1th September 1836 and Charles 29th August 1836 !!! 
Is it a mystery of human reproduction ?--Valérie75 09:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is remarkable that none of the Obituary writers of either of the two brothers have ever looked at this ! Shyamal 02:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This has apparently been resolved by someone with access to the India Office Records. Hope others can verify this or point to a website that has these records. Shyamal (talk) 15:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brothers ?
Talk:Second Council of Lyon

message: Wetterau, Bruce. World history. New York: Henry Holt and company. 1994  appears to be a textbook.  Textbooks are not generally considered authoritative references on Wikipedia.  It should, in any case, be replaced by any of the other books in English on the topic.  --Vicedomino (talk) 23:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authority 

message: I strongly suspect that two of the references under "External Links" are to materials which have probably violated the copyright on a volume published in 1990, held by Sheed and Ward, publishers.  --Vicedomino (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: I have added substantial quoted material from Denzinger on purgatory. Please note that the English versions of the canons of the council floating about on the Internet are incomplete, as some admit explicitly, so don't be surprised if they don't have this text.   Rick Jelliffe (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Purgatory
Talk:James John Joicey

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Hi Notafly, belated thanks for creating the James John Joicey bio page back in 2007. I've recently enlarged the bio and would appreciate your thoughts. I'd also be grateful for a source for the judge making Joicey promise to abandon collecting orchids please. Thanks! RLO1729 (talk) 09:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  James John Joicey bio (copy of off-page discussion) 

message: Very nice work.I am trying to recall where I got the orchid promise info.Not presumably in the entomological journal obits as it's gossip. The note in my card index on entomologists isn't referenced so it is no help. It may have come from Paul Smart the author of Butterflies of the World (and also later bankrupt). I will sleep on it and try a few avenues.Heres hoping Best regards Robert (Nash) aka Notafly (talk) 11:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks Robert. RLO1729 (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also seen it here, also not referenced. RLO1729 (talk) 12:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Thanks, that is certainly the earliest reference to the story I've seen. However, contemporary newspaper accounts indicate Joicey went bankrupt only twice: 1909 (the £30,000 mentioned by Miller seems to be a misinterpretation of the sums mentioned in that bankruptcy) and 1922 (rather than Miller's "1930s"), and I cannot find any evidence of the orchid story in the quite detailed newspaper accounts of either bankruptcy. This tends to reduce my confidence in the whole story, but there still may be some grain of truth in it and it would be interesting to know Miller's source. RLO1729 (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

text: OK, many thanks Robert. I might move the orchid story to a footnote until further corroboration is found, what do you think? RLO1729 (talk) 13:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

text: You read my mind :)  RLO1729 (talk) 14:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Done, let me know if the Note needs any adjustment. I was also slightly worried by the fact that the Wiki bio for Walter Rothschild does not mention orchids, but this indicates he was interested in them. RLO1729 (talk) 16:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: James John Joicey (copy of off-page discussion) 

message: Hey  You've done a ton of good work here and I'm impressed. Let me know if you have any questions about my edits. I'm mostly just following the WP:MOS. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨  05:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks SchreiberBike, your edits are helpful and appreciated. RLO1729 (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Many thanks for your copy edits 84.64.237.205, excellent work again!  ~ RLO1729💬 02:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Institut national des sciences appliquées de Lyon

message: Could someone update the logo? It was changed in 2014:
Sorry, i'm not able to do it myself (unconfirmed account). Thanks. Deelight (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks RaphaelQS! Deelight (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New logo
Talk:Metallic tower of Fourvière

message: This article states that the tower was constructed by a member of the public called Mr Gay. I thought that sounded odd (mainly the idea of something this size being built by a member of the public rather than the name) so I looked a little deeper- this information was part of a section translated and copied from the French Wikipedia, and this particular snippet was added by an IP who has made no other contributions to the French wiki. My French is dreadful so I'm finding it difficult to find anything to back this up or otherwise. MorganaFiolett (talk) 15:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed (better late than never).  I couldn't find any source to back it up that wasn't a direct copy of the Wikipedia article.  The claim was removed from the French version more than a year ago; the edit summary, roughly translated, says that Mr Gay never existed and a "Restaurant Gay" situated at the foot of the tower had no connection other than it made use of the available location. Cosmo0 (talk) 00:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

text: This link (reliability unknown) claims that the tower was built on land belonging to the Gay family, but until it can be verified I'm not going to put it back in.    Cosmo0 (talk) 00:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built by Mr Gay? 

message: Tv channels here are old pre 2012 analog tv frequencies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.35.19.142 (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  tv
Talk:Traboule

message: The television series "Secret Passages" covered the traboules of Lyon in the episode "Drug Tunnel." Most of the program was regarding tunnels used to smuggle narcotics over the Mexico/US border, but they also covered a casino and the traboules. They addressed the use of these shortcuts by French resistance fighters during the WWII, including describing Lyon as the headquarters of the Resistance. While two of the experts they had on the program were Lyonnais author Régis Neyret and a tour guide, a third was a French freedom fighter who spoke on experiences using the traboules to avoid Gestapo on a regular basis, including a network of secret mail boxes. I'll look for sources online to back this up. Atypicaloracle (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ever find anything? I'm curious what might be out there. I find it difficult to understand the concept and development of these passageways based on this article alone. Thanks! Cjcaesar (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Resistance 

message: How about something to tell us what it actually is?  Nothing in the text gives it a definition or physical description, and the pictures are just confusing, if decorative.  Is it supposed to be a type of stairwell, tunnel, or what?
KhyranLeander 17:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay -- but what is it? 

message: Would a link to  be appropriate? Jackiespeel (talk) 13:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube video
Talk:Basilica of Notre-Dame de Fourvière

message: Fourviere actually contains two cathedrals, one on top of the other. The upper sanctuary is very ornate, while the lower is a much simpler design. Fourviere is dedicated to the Virgin Mary, who is said to have saved the city of Lyon from the plague. On the 8th of December (Fetes de Lumiere), the city thanks the Virgin for saving the city by lighting candles in all their windows.
The Basilique has four main spires, plus one to the side, topped with a golden statue of the Virgin Mary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.133.149 (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Building and its Architecture 
Talk:Basilica of Saint-Martin d'Ainay

message: The paragraph of imaginings about the "Dark Ages" (this is a late eleventh-early twelfth century building after all) would be better devoted to an architectural description.--Wetman (talk) 01:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Notre-Dame de la Garde

message: have had to walk away from this but furnace bridge, which might strike you as mysterious, should be "altar"> I am not sure where Google Translate got its ideas on that. Elinruby (talk) 02:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: note to translators

message: still needs work to even be english, then will need reorganization Elinruby (talk) 01:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  first pass on another chunk  

message: I am starting a log here to get an overview of what part of the translation has been checked and what still needs to be checked. On a side note, I'll take on the architecture section, which I had already made a start with a few months ago. --HyperGaruda (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation log 

message: I've had a go at making the introduction sound like the rest is worth reading... grateful if anyone can improve it further! Somej (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Readibility 2
Talk:Artomyces pyxidatus

message: — Assignment last updated by Gmcb3345 (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BIOL 412 HONORS

message: Shouldn't we add the fact that Ramaria species are a lookalike to Artomyces pyxidatus to this article? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 01:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Appetite suppressant

message: Why does this redirect to an article with nothing to do with the subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.202.195.43 (talk) 10:33, February 9, 2007‎
:The article Anorectic is the correct target. Senator2029 ➔leave me a message 04:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Mayor of Paris

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 03:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: List of mayors of Paris →  – A shorter title, it's what's in bold here in the first paragraph, and what's at the head of the infobox. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 April 2022
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Metz

message: This should not have been moved without discussion, especially as it has been very recently edited. The main interest for most English readers is going to be the independent state, not the modern diocese. The old name was better and Bishopric of Metz is the commonest name in English for the stater. The article is a stub & certainly not worth splitting - I am proposing propose that. Comments? Johnbod (talk) 11:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you work on an article on the Bishopric of Metz, if you want to expand the section on the former state of the Holy Roman Empire. This article has been at the "Diocese of Metz" for over a year now, and you've made at least 5 edits on this article since the move. I'm not sure why you want to move it back now. Benkenobi18 (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is the commonest name in English - see WP:NAME. Johnbod (talk) 11:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, create an article for the bishopric of Metz. The two concepts are NOT the same. The bishopric of Metz was defunct at the dissolution of the HRE, while the diocese persists. Therefore WP:Name is irrelevant, since the names do not mean exactly the same thing. If you like, I will create the article again for you and you can unstub it. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed move 

message: Following on in a similar vein of the previous talk topic (Undiscussed move): It seems their is an article for the "Bishopric of Metz" yet searching specifically for the "Prince-Bishopric of Metz" links to this article (Roman Catholic Diocese of Metz). The redirect should point to the former article (Bishopric of Metz), right? Unless there's something I'm missing?
- clearly not an expert. Stvys (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mis-redirect?
Talk:Conidium

message: I was trying to wikify "non-motile" in the introduction. Is this some form of sessility? 05:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whither "non-motile spores" 

message: The image of Hyaloperonospora parasitica inappropriate (but in a nice way!!) It is a downy mildew not a fungus. The "conidia" in the micrograph are sporangia not conidia.
BioImages2000 (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong photo 

message: Word is not mentioned in page. 86.139.166.113 (talk) 23:50, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "aleuriospore" redirect here? 

message: The chlamydo* words in the lead appear to refer to a subtype of conidium, with a separate article, and should not be given as synonyms in the lead sentence.  I don't know enough about this topic to be certain I would separate this material into two sentences with complete accuracy.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  02:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead cleanup needed 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
Talk:French war planning 1920–1940

message: Tidied references with sfns and added footnotes. Keith-264 (talk) 13:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the expansion and moved title from particular to general. Two sections are incomplete and will be added soon. Keith-264 (talk) 07:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Found time to add a bit but the battle section isn't complete. Keith-264 (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Changed my mind about the battle section and rewrote it (again) using new source. Still to finish. Keith-264 (talk) 18:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Got round to it.Keith-264 (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: Greetings Zulu, thanks for taking an interest in the article, it's nice to know that some bugger has read it. ;O); I've had another look at the sections you've ce'd and see your point that the narrative gets a bit disjointed at times, sadly, it was like that in the sources - in the British OH, the BEF goes invisible between the rush into Belgium and the retreat to the French border. I've changed a few things to try to make it smoother but also tried to avoid straying into OR. Hope it helps. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Greetings again, Your good faith stands out a mile and it's always nice to learn from constructive criticism. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 06:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Maréchal des logis

message: English translations should only be used if it is the common term or at least commonly heard. In the case of this rank, "Marshal-of-Lodgings" is never, ever heard. It would be utterly unfamiliar to anyone, English-speaking or otherwise. Where, therefore, is the logic in titling this article with a term that is never used? I have moved it back. From Wikipedia:Naming conventions: "Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article unless the native form is more commonly recognized by readers than the English form." (Italics mine). This is very definitely the case here, as it is with, for instance, SS ranks, which all use the German words, not the very approximate, inaccurate and clumsy English translations. I have studied military history for many years and have never seen Maréchal-des-logis translated into English (it is either left in the French or rendered as "Sergeant", its equivalent), so there is no reason for us to do so. -- Necrothesp 23:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this page remains, it should somehow be linked to fr:Maréchal des Logis. Trying to add the language link prompted for a conflict to solve. 2A01:E0A:6:8070:62F2:62FF:FE42:3691 (talk) 11:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglicisation
Talk:Grand Prix du Comminges

message: What is this part trying to say? "In 1926, the French Grand Prix was held here over a slightly altered course and in the 1930s, the course layout was modified a few times beginning with changes made to accommodate holding the official French Grand Prix in 1928. "
The only French Grand Prix held at the circuit were the 1928 and 1949 (I created 1928's page a week or so ago, and unless there is activity on Talk:French Grand Prix, I will add a note and winner to the list to say there were two French GPs in 1949, one a Sports Car race held in Saint-Gaudens). So I'm not sure what it's trying to say. Should it be that the Comminges Grand Prix was held over an altered circit for 1926? According to https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/database/circuits/st-gaudens the first layout was used from 1925-1932, but they may not have included minor changes. A7V2 (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing bit
Talk:Grand Prix de la Marne

message: Can anybody subsantiate Mariette Delangle ran a Bugatti at this or any other French GP in '31?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  16:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oh Hellé
Talk:Roland's Breach

message: Roland's Breach lies within Spain, therefore namingwise the article should not bear the French name: La Brèche de Roland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.94.201 (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's title should be renamed: La Brecha de Rolando
Talk:Mechanics' institute

message: As far as I can see, there are no mechanics' institutes which still follow the original model and name, and the "Existing" lists seems to overlap extensively with Historical. In Australia, they are often heritage-listed buildings, and many of the existing buildings are now libraries. I suggest collapsing these lists into one, and also, at least in the case of Australia, move most into the Mechanics' institutes of Australia article and just a small collection of prominent ones in this article. Thoughts?
Also, I will move be requesting a technical move to the singular form of the name, per WP:SINGULAR. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about requesting a technical move to the singular form of the name.--Bduke (talk) 03:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical vs Existing lists
Talk:Kidnapping, Caucasian Style

message: The translation(s) of the title are a bit awkward.  I have used the US translation which is the same as the one featured on the diagram (and mentioned on IMDB).  Not certain if that was the best option.--Konstable 01:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: :a scene was removed in which the Coward scratches an "F" into a fence, the Pro scratches a "U", and, after a militsiya office appears at the scene, the Fool quickly scratches "NNY FILM"
Could you explain it for non-Russians?
--Error (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted scene 
Talk:Cottian Alps

message: Speaking as Italian I'd rather classify this article (and also the articles about other Alpine sections) at least as a mid-importance item on the Importance scale (topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Italy without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally). I think that Cottian Alps at an Italian level could be reasonably considered more important and well known than Simona Ventura, which is the example provided here for a mid-importance article--F Ceragioli (talk) 21:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jura Mountains

message: Some material has been copied and translated from this French language wiki. To comply with WP:CWW a link to the source article is placed here. It should be noted, however, that the source is uncited, and so the material should not be considered reliable. SilkTork ✔Tea time 11:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied material

message: Article tells me really nothing about what I might see or visit in the Jura Mountains. What types of plants and animals live there? Are there villages? Roads? Footpaths? Is it cold?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.18.13.17 (talk) 13:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: But you've told me nothing!

message: The etymology of the Iura mentioned in Caesar's De Bello Gallico and other ancient sources is entirely unclear and unresolved, and its derivation from a supposed Celtic etymon *jor- is basically just a conjecture from 1907 that was adopted by Georges Dottin in his 1920 edition of "La langue gauloise", but which nobody has really followed up on in modern studies because there is nothing to follow up on. Lacking any true linguistic cognate, linking it with a meaning "forest" or "forested hill" is the epitome of circular resoning, and it is no surprise that two out of three sources listed for the etymology are works of geology, not onomastics (the third one, unsurprisingly, is a geography book).
"Iura" is and remains an unexplained etymon, and no such lemma is listed in any modern Celtic dictionary. There definitely never was a form "iuria" or "juria", which someone seems to have pulled out of their arse in its entirety; it's absent from any ancient source. This may be a bit bold, but I am deleting what the article currently has to say on etymology and adding what I can say as a linguist. I have gone through several relevant dictionaries and come up empty. My last hope would be Xavier Delamarre, but his new edition of Celtic toponyms is ordered but hasn't arrived yet. Trigaranus (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious etymology 