Talk:Mossimo

message: What's the correct pronunciation? Could someone add this to the article? Thanks
Vicco Lizcano 22:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: I have undone your edit to the added data I have put into the Mossimo page.
Unless and until you provide the slightest evidence (from reliable sources, and yes, blogs don't count) that
:1) the controversy actually exists,
:2) the controversy is widely covered and important,
:3) important and/or significant enough (as per the undue weight principle) to take up half the text of a very short article,
and 
:4)  Is written in a neutral, non-weaselly manner
it doesn't belong and is coming out. --Calton | Talk 23:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DeMolay vs. Mossimo 

message: This bit about Rose expanding the company to the south was added by Rose [go ahead and check the log] and never questioned or sourced by anyone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.85.116 (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rose 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mossimo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427231300/http://mossimo.com.ph/ to http://www.mossimo.com.ph/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: There has been some back-and-forth reverting related to the scandal information being in this article. I agree that it does not belong in the lede, but since it affects the CEO it does have an impact on the company. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 14:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't sure that it belonged either, but Mossimo Giannulli redircets here so the page is also about him and should include some information about him since he doesn't have a separate article. - PaulT+/C 03:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about cheating scandal 

message: In these two diffs (), the IP editor says:
:This is a page about a person not a company and this page has been connected via links as a person not as an entity for several years in terms of listing this page as the spouse of Lori Loughlin and father of Olivia jade
:This is a page about Mossimo Giannulli not and has been linked to him as a person for several years - this is not a page about a company historically on Wikipedia.
If this is true, I might support that the appropriate content be moved to the person's page and delete this one.  There does not seem to be much WP:RS here.  --David Tornheim (talk) 03:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not opposed to the creation of the article. I initially reverted in those diffs because no sources were provided. See WP:RS and WP:V. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 03:31, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for quick reply.  How would you feel about restoring this version if we add in the WP:RS that is in this article right now?  I know we have to be super careful about WP:BLP, so I wanted to run it by you first.  We of course would need to make sure the link to the company is preserved in the article about the individual.    --David Tornheim (talk) 03:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  That, and we need to add a reasonably sized lead section. Looks like the IP didn't include one in that revision. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 03:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  I put it back.  I'll start putting in the WP:RS.  Can you do the WP:LEDE? I plan to keep some of the scandal here, unless others object.  It does seem slightly unfair to link the scandal of the owner to the company, but maybe not entirely.  --David Tornheim (talk) 03:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

text:  I did all the changes I plan for tonight.  No need to work on the WP:LEDE as I had originally requested above unless you think it needs work.  I'm increasingly inclined to delete the scandal from this article, since the company is not even owned by the founder any more anyway.  I suppose it could affect the company's reputation, but I think we would need WP:RS to say that.  How do you and others feel about deleting that from this article?  --David Tornheim (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

text: Please note, that with 's consent, I went ahead and made these into two articles.  Please review if you have time and make suggestions and/or changes as appropriate.  I believe I am done for the night on these two articles.  --David Tornheim (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. As long as there are enough reliable sources for both topics I don't see why we shouldn't have more than one article. And Mossimo Giannulli has a bunch of incoming links already thanks to WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks for creating the new article. - PaulT+/C 05:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Person vs. company