lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crvenka

message: Tscherwenka was found in 1785. What happened from 1785 up to 1945?--87.153.146.31 (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly, some "Austro-Hungarian" historians are actually thinking that whole history started with Prinz Eugen and that nothing existed before him. I expanded now this article with brief history of Crvenka, so there should not be problem with this any more. PANONIAN 17:40, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History of Crvenka

message: Shouldn't mention be added of the massacre that apparently took place in Crvenka during World War II? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II massacre
Talk:Mol (Ada)

message: I certainly have no wish to start an edit war, but I struggle to understand what is the criteria to determine the notability of a person in the list. Is it the existence of an article on English Wikipedia alone, or are there others? Can other language wikis be used to establish notability? If the original removal of most of the people on the list (some of which, granted, aren't very notable, but others arguably are more notable than some of those that are left on the list) was justified due to WP:WTAF, doesn't removing the redlinks suffice?
Honest questions, I'm trying to understand how the rules work, to avoid future misunderstandings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.106.81.26 (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:French kissing

message: I'm sorry, but I find it particularly absurd that French Kissing has its own article but that French kissing could somehow ever go anywhere but there. It'd be like if Snoop dogg that redirect to dog instead of Snoop Dogg. If the random anonymous editor would like to discuss it, that's fine, but I suggest that such a person avoid breaking the 3RR. Cheeser1 04:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted once more, but won't anymore. I gave rationale in the edit summary. That comparison is quite absurd, IMO. French kissing should redirect to the article about the act/kiss. The capitalisation is sufficient disambiguation. 76.178.95.219 07:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to what?
Talk:Ljutovo

message: User:IvanOS removed alternative Croatian name and I do not see valid reason for that. If current official name used in Croatian is Mirgeš, Croats certainly used name Ljutovo before name Mirgeš was officially adopted and I see no reason why this other name cannot be mentioned. User:IvanOS also changed order of minority names and placed Croatian name before Bunjevac one. I reverted this because I do not see any valid reason for such change - Bunjevac ethnicity in this village is larger than Croatian one and therefore NPOV way of usage of alternative names should respect size of ethnic groups. PANONIAN 22:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian name and names in name section
Talk:Bajmok

message: User:IvanOS removed alternative Croatian name and I do not see valid reason for that. If current official name used in Croatian is Bajmak, Croats certainly used name Bajmok before name Bajmak was officially adopted and I see no reason why this other name cannot be mentioned. User:IvanOS also changed order of minority names and placed Croatian name before Bunjevac one. I reverted this because I do not see any valid reason for such change - Bunjevac ethnicity in this village is larger than Croatian one and therefore NPOV way of usage of alternative names should respect size of ethnic groups. PANONIAN 22:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian name and names in name section
Talk:Naval Aircraft Factory N3N

message: I owned and flew a restored N3N-3 for 20 years.  Though I researched the type extensively, I can find no official US Navy document citing the N3N as the 'Canary.'  Perhaps it was an unofficial name such as the generic "Yellow Peril" for all USN trainers or the affectionate "Yellow Bird."  I'd welcome hard info on the Canary name.
B Tillman 1 Feb 09
Hi,  We too have owned our N for over 40 yrs and have never seen any documentation on the "canary" name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.54.181 (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canary 

message: Can we create a disambiguation page to distinguish this page for the aircraft from www.N3N.io, the company?
2601:642:4400:6700:D59E:F4F3:C6CE:12B9 (talk) 22:17, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Wikipedia have an article on that company? If not, there is nothing to disambiguate. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 23:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Is ambiguous from the point of view of a search engine user search for the company term and seeing the airplane wiki page in results. From the wiki page on disambiguation:
Primary topic when a disambiguation page lists only one existing article by that name[edit]
Shortcuts:
WP:ONLYONE
WP:ONEBLUELINKDAB
When a disambiguation pages lists only one existing article by that name (all other suggested articles are red-linked), the normal rules for determining the primary topic still apply. The existing article does not automatically become the primary topic. So:
If the article with the blue link is chosen to be the primary topic, it becomes the primary article. The disambiguation page is then moved to a page carrying the (disambiguation) qualifier.
On the rare occasions that a red-linked article is preferred to be the primary topic, the disambiguation page will still occupy the primary position as long as the red-linked article has not been written.
If no article is preferred to be the primary topic, then the disambiguation page will remain the primary landing page.
2601:642:4400:6700:D59E:F4F3:C6CE:12B9 (talk) 23:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

text: Per WP:DABRED, "Do not create red links to articles that are unlikely ever to be written, or are likely to be removed as insufficiently notable topics." The initial Ghits I've found for the company are its own websites, so it appears be insufficiently notable. - BilCat (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  N3N the aircraft v. N3N the company
Talk:Bački Breg

message: User:IvanOS removed alternative Croatian name and I do not see valid reason for that. If current official name used in Croatian is Bereg, Croats certainly used name Bački Breg before name Bereg was officially adopted and I see no reason why this other name cannot be mentioned. PANONIAN 22:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian name
Talk:Bački Monoštor

message: What's wrong? 52% of peasants from Monoštor say - Croats. There's no "Šokci" section. Disputes about Šokci matter must be discussed at other article. Kamarad Walter 12:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Šokci article clearly say that Šokci could be both: separate ethnicity and subgroup of Croats. This is traditional Šokac village and the fact that its inhabitants declare themselves as Croats does not mean that they are not Šokci (in this case they are seen as subgroup of Croats, of course). PANONIAN 21:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Šokci 

message: User:IvanOS removed alternative Croatian name and I do not see valid reason for that. If current official name used in Croatian is Monoštor, Croats certainly used name Bački Monoštor before name Monoštor was officially adopted and I see no reason why this other name cannot be mentioned. PANONIAN 22:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian name
Talk:Attack of the Killer Tomatoes (1991 video game)

message: Anyone care to explain why cacodemon is listed under See Also. I looked at the article and it has absolutely nothing to do with Killer Tomatoes or video games. Ian Fairchild (talk) 09:31, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cacodemon
Talk:Ahakista

message: Three of my family's close friends died in this tragedy, so I am intimately familiar with the factual background. For many years the Canadian government and media failed to take seriously the bloodiest terrorist attack on Canadians in the country's history because of an unfair perception that most of the passengers were "Indian", and not truly Canadian. This is an offensive notion to the victims' families and loved ones. Most of the passengers were Canadian. Some immigrated to Canada from India. Others (including two of the children who I knew) were born in Canada to parents originally from India. Others were Canadians of non-Indian origin traveling to see India as regular Canadian tourists. The overwhelming majority of this entire collective group were citizens of Canada, not of India (which does not allow dual citizenship). It is an unsubstantiated and in my view inaccurate statement to say that "most" of the passengers were "emigrants from India", or that "most" were "returning to India for holiday". This was a profoundly Canadian loss. Mishandling by the Canadian government led to the destruction of evidence and the failure to convict key suspects who were thought to have masterminded the attack. I have edited the article to reflect the more accurate statement that the majority of the passengers were Canadians, who happened to be of Indian origin. I would also like to note that the Irish people and government, including the people of Ahakista, were generous and compassionate in their reaction to this tragedy. The victims' families and loved ones will never forget the kindness of the Irish people in this time of sadness. Cbreitel 04:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Howard V. Hendrix

message: I restored the article to what it was on 25 April by Rackdaddy.  I like Scott Sigler and J.C. Hutchins as well as any junkie or beta, but the hack and slash done on this article was not the way to go.  I added a controversy section to address Mr. Hendrix comments and the backlash that resulted in what I thought was an NPOV a way as possible.  Eviscerating the article is not a proper response, especially since this article looks like it has had much of its previous substance since 2005.Ultimate ed 03:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: I've been trying to find any references supporting the awards listed in this article. For the Nebula Award (likely one of the easiest to find), I've found multiple lists of nominees but Hendrix isn't on any of them. 
For the Abraham L. Polonsky Award, I can't find any list anywhere which lists winners or nominees. Same for the Pushcart Prize. Anyone able to find anything else? ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 04:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 23:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Accursed Mountains

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to the original suggestion. I could foresee this page shuffling around a bit more over the years, but consensus at this time is for Accursed Mountains (which, let's be real, is the coolest-sounding option) as the English-language name in common use that doesn't step into any ethnic disputes. Or, well, fewer of them, anyway. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Vaticidalprophet 15:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Prokletije →  – Article should be renamed to the more internationally accepted version "Accursed Mountains" as evidenced in these articles by Lonely Planet, BBC, Euronews, Financial Times. Prokletije is a serbian version of a mountain range mostly located in Albanian populated regions. Kj1595 (talk) 08:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 April 2021 

message: Montenegrin language is an indipendent language due to standartisation of the language RoyalHeritageAlb (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Austrian German is also standardized. Should we write "Vienna (Austrian German: Wien)"? No. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:57, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montenegrin language
Category talk:Islands of Indonesia

message: Significant parts of the Indonesian archipelago have nothing whatsoever to do with the major pacific or any subsidiary oceans related - and as such it is a misnomer to consider Indonesia to be related to either the Indian or Pacfic oceans - it is a physiographic and geographic nonsense to consider all internal waters of the archipelago as being directly related to or as a significant part of the pacific.  Eastern Indonesian islands - some of them are not necessarily in the pacific region either - so it should be case by case rather than a consideration of all the islands of indonesia to be related to the pacific - geologically, oceanographically, tectonically, or any other form of scientific knowledge.  However as always - if someone has a ref that  'proves' beyond all doubt that Indonesia is indeed a part of the Pacific ocean I'd be prepared to read the ref but not necessarily revert my revert SatuSuro 05:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Islands of the Pacific?
Talk:James Weddell

message: Weddell's book has a different location and date for his southmost point.  Does anyone have a preference for the "February 17, 1823 the two ships had reached latitude 74°34' S and longitude 30°12' W" from the web site?  Southmost was February 20, 1823 at 74°15' S, 34°16'45" W (Weddel page 37; erroneously 1822 but correct 1823 in map and Fuchs, 1970).  Page 35 says February 17 was at 71°34' S, 31°12' W, so the 74 might be a misreading of 71. (SEWilco 04:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected from Feb 17 to Feb 20.  Anyone want a map of the trip?  (SEWilco 03:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Southmost location and date

message: Facts on nationality are not clear.Why do most websites claim he is Scottish when it says he is english here?.cant find definitive proof of nationality myself but most credible websites across the world state Scottish heritage.worth checking out folks!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.60.190 (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English sailor? 

message: In what Ostend Weddell is born? In Belgium, in Essex or in Norfolk? This source says that ...Weddell's father was a Presbyterian upholsterer from Dalserf in Scotland who had settled in London and married... - nothing about Belgium. --Kikos 19:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ostend 

message: Is the dusky conure, Aratinga weddellii, also named after him?  --zandperl (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commemmorations
Talk:Edmontosaurus mummy AMNH 5060

message: It seems that these image by Osborn from 1912 are public domain.   They should be included in the article. 
-- Petri Krohn 15:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PD images

message: "Dinosaur mummy" directs here. There are multiple fossils that have been referred to as dinosaur or fossil "mummies" due to the fact that preservation extends far beyond mere bone, sometimes even including skin and scales.  Is there no article for this sort of extreme fossilization?73.32.145.62 (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone needs to make it... See section above. FunkMonk (talk) 01:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dinosaur mummy

message: Yet another suggestion: although one could probably assume 69-68 Ma for this species, unless I missed it, I could not find any coverage of dating/age in this article yet.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 04:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dating

message: There does not seem to be any mention of the overall dimensions or mass of the mummy in the article, just the size of the dig.  Is this data available?  Also, are there estimates of the dimensions and mass of this dinosaur when it was alive? -- Harris7 (talk) 11:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This was also asked about during the FAC, and such measurements don't seem to be given in the sources. FunkMonk (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case the article should say that the size of this prehistoric monster is unknown and could easily range from the size of a mouse to that of a house. GMRE (talk) 19:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the size the species in general could reach could be mentioned. Or maybe that could be misleading, what does  think? FunkMonk (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: When is "early spring"? Isn't the actual date known? --The Huhsz (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That probably is unknown. I'm assuming the guys must have been digging around for a whole summer there, before recollecting that they found that one some time in "early spring". GMRE (talk) 19:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Season

message: One of the pictures has highlighted zones, marked as "A" and "B", but there does not appear to be any explanation. If anyone knows what those are meant to mean, can they add them into the picture caption? GMRE (talk) 19:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean this one? They show where some of the other close-up images are located on the animal, namely these: Not sure how or if this should be added to the caption. FunkMonk (talk) 01:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the significance of the A and B?
Talk:Intira Charoenpura

message: It should be "Charoenpura". Her email address given in her newspaper column is spelled this way. See http://www.matichonbook.com/newsdetail.php?gd=44759 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lerdsuwa (talk • contribs) 15:34, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The spelling of her lastname 
Talk:Francis Brunn

message: Juggler on TV... 
It can be proved that Francis Brunn performed on the Ed Sullivan show (or a similar TV show), in the early 1950/60s (?)... what i'd like to add to the article, if it can be verified, is that Jack Kerouac said in a poem, that Charlie Parker died watching a juggler on TV.. so I was wondering if it could have been Francis Brunn.. Parker died in 1955 so maybe? Xsxex 04:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mostar interchange

message: Webster's New World Dictionary (Third College Edition, 1988), on page 1588 says about capitalization: Geographical terms (are capitalized) when they are part of a proper name (Long Island, Great Lakes, Dead Sea, Gobi Desert, Rocky Mountains, etc). Eleventh Edition from 2003 adds some new examples like Left Bank, Yosemite Valley, New York City, North Pole....as you probably know, in English even Street, Bridge or Hotel are capitalized if part of a name. Since this is English Wikipedia, names are adjusted to English grammar not the opposite, just like we don't write Severno More instead of Severno more because English do so (North Sea). Pozdrav PajaBG (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Mainstream Christianity

message: Since editors looking at this redirect would look here before any of the article talk pages in question, this seems like the best place to have this discussion so that later editors can review rational and add to the discussion as needed without the discussion being lost.
My feeling is that this redirect should link to the Christianity article, which per wikipedia standards discusses what mainstream Christians believe (as opposed to fringe theologies.) If an editor wants to have a wikilink to specifically the Nicene Creed from another page they should just link to Nicene Creed. If they create a link to Mainstream Christianity and Mainstream Christianity redirects to Nicene Creed, that is basically creating an WP:EASTEREGG through a redirect, which should be avoided.
It’s also worth noting that while most (though probably not all) Christians who would be considered or consider themselves to be mainstream believe in the Nicene Creed, whether or not Christianity should be defined solely by the creed is controversial, so it is best to just link to the Christianity page to avoid taking a POV stance on that. - Relinus (talk) 23:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My decision to revert was based only on the fact that the redirect to Nicene Creed has been in place for nine years. I believe that changing the target after such a length of time warrants a discussion. I think your explanation is persuasive and I agree that Christianity is the more suitable redirect, as you outlined. Other editors may still raise objections, but I support your edit. Sorry I was mistaken in my edit summary; the page that wikilinked to this redirect was Jesus in Christianity and I have removed that link. --Hazhk (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, I'll take a look at other links to see if any need changing as well. Thanks. -  Relinus (talk) 19:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Christianity or Nicene Creed?
Talk:Gottlieb

message: If David Gottlieb isn't going to have his own article any time soon, he at least needs to have a biographical section here, because he's linked to directly at articles like Baffle Ball. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 05:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs bio section 

message: Here's Gottlieb Company being Active as an Entertainment Company in San Francisco, California, U.S. in 1980.--2600:1702:4B28:F760:219:E3FF:FEE0:BE2B (talk) 03:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gottlieb Company being Active as an Entertainment Company in San Francisco, California, U.S. 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Damien Gottlieb. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 4#Damien Gottlieb until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  T*U (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Damien Gottlieb" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Where is it?! 94.190.199.9 (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Centigrade 37 I can't find it 

message: :Gottlieb (formerly D. Gottlieb & Co.) was an American arcade game corporation based in Chicago, Illinois. It is best known for developing the arcade game Q*bert.
I vaguely remember they produced that title, but why would it be considered more significant than the vast number of other games they produced? Gottlieb's page at Arcade Museum doesn't even mention Q*Bert. And of course, that title was based on a classic arcade game that well preceded it. I'm willing to be wrong, of course, but it seems unlikely a pinball company with such a long, colorful history would be primarily remembered for a spin-off property—not even from a movie or TV show, but another game. – AndyFielding (talk) 23:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with you here on that, and I only came here to the talk page to discuss taking that out. I had no idea they may Q*Bert, so it's great information to keep in there. But I'm not here reading this article for Q*Bert, and I don't think too many other pinheads are either. They are best known for what they did most, which is clearly all the pinball machines listed below. Fixing it now. 96.233.56.201 (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Best known for…"? 

message: Gottleib also made a bell ringer flipperless pinball machine in the 90s with only approximately 160-170 units being made 2601:402:4401:2CB0:8C2B:CA91:942:A9B8 (talk) 19:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing a pinball machine