Talk:Fruit wine

message: I'm very dubious about the use of "country wine" as a term for all "non-grape" wines.
A.) I've never heard it, and I've been drinking wine for 45 years.
B.) The Merriam-Websters New International Dictionary, Unabridged, 2nd Edition, with 600,000 entries, does not even list it as a footnote.
C.) The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (small print, but still the complete dictionary) does not list it.
D.) The 700-page "Food Lover's Companion", a recent, very useful encyl. about food and wine does not list it.
E.) I can't find anything in a Google search that jibes with this definition.
F.) Today's New York Time's food section had a lead article on Bordeaux wines.  In the course of the article they translated "vin du pays" as "country wine".
Did whoever wrote the article about "Country Wine" just make up this term?  I think it's a nice one, and I have nothing better off-hand to replace it, but I wonder if it's accurate? Hayford Peirce 20:47, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked my three winemaking books, oddly all were written in Britain. One of them, The Winemaker's Companion by CJJ Berry and BCA Turner, has "Those who make country wines (named by ingredient, apple, gooseberry, elderberry etc.)" So it is not made up by the author. Rmhermen 02:59, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)
*Hmmm, maybe it's a term only used in England.  And possibly relatively new.  As I said, my OED doesn't mention it, but that edition is at least 20 years old.  I wonder if the article ought to be renamed "Non-grape wines"? Hayford Peirce 04:33, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term "country wine" 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Country wine → Fruit wine
===Survey===
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
# Support: more appropriate/descriptive name. ◄scharks► 09:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
# Support: more appropriate/descriptive name. ◄scharks► 09:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 07:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I propose that, should people feel they actually need to merge plum wine, the actual content should merge, while "plum wine" should redirect to Umeshu. George Leung 02:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge.  All of these fruit wines have individual characters, but it is POV to privilege some of them over others. Bigturtle 22:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plum wine article 

message: The Deutscher Landwein article was about the level in the German wine classification, which I've now merged with that article, and reincarnated as a disambiguation to there and to this article. Plain "Landwein" redirects to the disambig FlagSteward 12:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landwein 

message: Any particular reason why fruit wine is no longer considered a fermented beverage? -- Bigwyrm 23:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: There are only commercial links, photos, and dead links to serve as references; thus I am removing them. If someone can find independent and reliable sources for this section, that'd be great. Otherwise, please stop the blanket reverting, Badagnani. Eugene2x►talk 21:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Restore text pending thoughtful, careful, and deliberate discussion (third request). Badagnani (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Forget it. I have tried to discuss with you and your blatant violations of WP:OWN, however you refuse to cooperate and are aggressively biased toward your own opinion. You ignore consensus when it is against your opinion, and still tirelessly say the same exactly thing over and over again. I'm exasperated with this. Let someone else discuss with you. Eugene2x►talk 22:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plum wine section 

message: Some of the content in the section Dandelion wine is from the merged stub Dandelion wine. AgneCheese/Wine 19:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the content in the section Rose hip wine is from the merged stub Rose hip wine. AgneCheese/Wine 22:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the content in the Types of cherry wine section comes from the merged stub Kijafa. AgneCheese/Wine 04:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the content in the Balloon wine comes from the merged stub Balloon wine. AgneCheese/Wine 08:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution note

message: More thought should be put into the description of Kijafa, not only because it is the only cherry wine mentioned, but because its origins are confusing.  My bottle, and those of many on the internet, refer to Denmark four times on the label, including as the bottler and producer.  Some bottles mentioned on the internet mention Denmark twice but then have "Product of Finland" at the bottom.  This matter should be cleared up, and perhaps another cherry wine mentioned as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dclahti (talk • contribs) 19:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherry wine 

message: I have to disagree with the following statement "fruit wines often do not improve with bottle age and are usually meant to be consumed within a year of bottling.". From personal experience I can tell you that is wrong. I would edit the article but I cannot figure out how to remove the reference at the foot of the page, number 6, which the statement references. HLA91 (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fruit wine keeping qualities 

message: I would love to read more about the history of fruit wines, if anyone cares to add a history section. k. da-ma-te (talk) 02:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: aren't blueberries used to make wine also? it isn't in the list of fruits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.126.102.146 (talk) 06:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  blueberries 

message: I am a complete novice and am still learning Wikipedia etiquette and standard practice, so please forgive any ignorant mistakes. I am removing the section "Fruit wine making", as it appears to violate WP:NOTHOWTO. Please let me know if I've done anything wrong. Catastrophic Failure (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of section "Fruit wine making" 

message: The section states that pineapple wine is not commercially available.  A quick search of the internet came up with this article about a commercial producer of pineapple wine.  Here are links to the article about the wine and a link to the producer's webpage specific to the pineapple wine:
http://www.dailyfruitwine.com/2016/10/lovely-french-polynesian-pineapple-wine-yum/
http://manuteatahiti.com/en/vins-de-fruits/
I keep myself to spelling and grammar edits so I hope there is a more experienced editor who will make the appropriate changes to the page based on this information.
AgLupo (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pineapple wine section 

message: "For historical reasons, mead, cider, and perry are also excluded from the definition of fruit wine." 
Umm...last time I checked, HONEY was not a FRUIT. "For historical reasons"? cider and perry are fine (though I imagine that whether or not the reasons are purely historical is debatable), but mead could not under ANY stretch of the imagination be said to be a "fruit wine". (for the record, mead is "honey wine": made from honey, which is made by bees, from *nectar*; which comes from *flowers*, which are the precursors to fruit, but are not fruit in and of themselves). Firejuggler86 (talk) 07:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  mead??