lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon/History

message: First we need to create a "History of Oregon" page so the below will no longer be red for our green state. Done.
After that I'm thinking we could break things down into four catagories:
*Native People History
*History to 1806 (1492-1806)
*Pioneer History (1807-1900)
*Modern History (1900 to present)
For everything until 1848 it would be history of the Oregon country, then with the formation of the territory the focus should be on Oregon only. Not that I'm trying to be a dictator, though that might be fun.
For greater usability I propose a series of lists, of which I have created one and will make the others if people are OK with this. I will make them interconnect, but useing just the lists would give people a broad understanding of the history.
Aboutmovies 07:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal

message: Created the other lists:
And now I have been informed there is a history section to the WikiOregon. Why wasn't it integrated with this area? Where is the link form this main page?
More to come, including creating the sub pages.
Aboutmovies 00:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Aboutmovies. Why don't you go ahead and post about starting this subproject on the project's main talkpage so more people will know about it? I only stumbled across it because I saw the talk page link was blue while the subproject page was still red. You could go ahead and and start the project page too if you want (versus this, the talk page)--see the other sub project pages for ideas. I think the reason the History page is a subpage of EngineerScotty's is because it just isn't ready for primetime yet. I suggest you read through all the posts on the main project talk page to see the where/who/what/why of what has been worked on so far. Cheers! Sorry I seem to be the only one from the project talking to you so far. I'm not stalking you, I swear... Katr67 20:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued 

message: Did some copyediting, hope that helps. Katr67 20:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Star of Oregon]] 

message: Just a heads up, there is also a current Oregon Rangers Association , a somewhat controversial organization that started in Junction City a few years ago. A disambiguation might be in order. Katr67 06:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully the new group won't be notable. Started the page, discovered they did not participate in the Cayuse War. Aboutmovies 01:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note about Oregon Rangers 

message: I've started a draft bio of Henry Failing, 3x mayor of Portland, here, if anybody wants to contribute. -Pete (talk) 04:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Failing
Talk:Soviet submarine TK-202

message: The two articles Russian submarine TK-202 and Soviet submarine TK-202 have very similar content. The "Russian" article is flagged as an orphan. The Template:Typhoon class submarine links to the "Soviet" rather than the "Russian" article. Thus I flagged the merger for others to consider. I don't have strong feelings about these articles myself, so I'll accept whatever reasonable decision the interested editors make. --Jdlh  | Talk 18:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge "Russian submarine TK-202" into this article "Soviet submarine TK-202"
Talk:Tioga Pass

message: While it is a very fine photo, the current picture in the infobox is nowhere near Tioga Pass.  It's about ten or fifteen miles down the road to the west, at least, looking in the wrong direction.  If I recall correctly that overlook is Olmstead (Olmsted?) Point.  Probably this picture belongs in the Tioga Road article.  Rather than just removing it, does someone have a photo of Tioga Pass itself?  I can dig around for one when I'm home.  Thanks, Antandrus  (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Category talk:State governments of India

message: * CM list pages / CM list category
* Governor/Lt Governor list pages / Governor/Lt Governor list category
* State wise Vidhan Sabha pages
* State wise Raj Bhavan pages
* Individual articles describing terms such as MLA, MLC, CM, Governor, Lt Governor, Vidhan Sabha, Vidhan Parishad etc 
Any suggestions. Regards, Vjdchauhan 08:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This category should contain
Talk:SuperClash

message: Hello, the article currently reads This match was to unify the AWA and WCCW Titles. If I understood the DVD The Spectacular Legacy of the AWA correctly it was originally planned The King Lawler looses the title somewhen in the AWA-area, but since he wasn't paid (even by now) his salaries from the SuperClash 3 he never appeared on AWA programme, house shows or the like. The AWA wihout notifying him stripped the title from him and gave it to the winner of a Battle Royal. -- Bardnet 10:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The titles were unified, the unification just didn't last long. This usually doesn't happen in wrestling, but happens a lot in boxing (they called titles unified just because one person holds both). TJ Spyke 02:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SuperClash 3 - Title unification
Talk:Gebirgsjäger

message: The picture of the M30 gunner shows him wearing a green uniform rather than the standard Wehrmacht field gray. Is this  correct or a problem stemming from colorizing a black and white picture?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Axeman (talk • contribs) 21:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Right now nearly every section has an additional-citations-needed-section template. I think at this point it's probably best to tag the whole article as citations-needed.
I don't have access to this book, but it should be a good citation for at least most of the uniforms (has photos and descriptions): . An ebook version is available Overdrive, if someone can check it out from their library to do the citations right. 0x0077BE (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Would it be a good idea to explain why they were equipped with fewer automatic weapons than other units, as said in the the first section after the intro summary? I'd just add "...which were better suited to the more open terrain upon which they were supposed to fight." or something like that (I don't actually know if that's why; it's an example).Widgetdog (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatic weapons 

message: In the history - WWII section their war crimes in the southern European countries need to be mentioned and detailed. These units have been found to have committed some of the worst atrocities done by Wehrmacht whilest supposedly fighting the partisans. 
 
2A02:3032:209:929C:E4F0:570B:E3B:37DF (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'History' part lacks any mentioning of their war crimes
Talk:Egyptian Building

message: Much improved now that both articles are combined! Thanks for putting in the time to do that.
Patrick Sweet, MD
Does anyone have any updated pictures of this building?  They've done some recent renovations and a better, more up-to-date picture might be nice.
71.63.109.92 (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici National Park

message: Okay, really rewrite, as this looks like just a machine translation to me.  It's terrible.  But I'm doing it only if I can rename the article to Aigüestortes and Lake St. Maurice National Park, with a redirect back to this non-name name, as well as it's Catalan name (I mean, if you're not gonna translate it, then just keep it in Catalan!).  If you really, really hate that idea, then obviously I'm going to have to spend time fighting with folks, so then I'm not wasting my time on that,  So let me know if there are objections!! RangerRichard (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was translated from the Catalan wikipedia by Gerarcalis (edit history). I'm pretty sure nobody is going to complain if you rewrite it from scratch. As for the name you propose, it looks fine to me (some people might argue that Sant Maurici should not be translated?). Unfortunately, the Government of Catalonia didn't translate the park's website to English. Recently I came up with the same sort of problem when I created the article for Montgrí, Medes Islands and Baix Ter Natural Park. In this case I didn't translate Baix Ter because the only English translation of the park I could find was Montgrí, Medes Islands and Baix Ter Natural Park (link). Maybe it would have been better to use Montgrí, Medes Islands and Low Ter Natural Park? I also wonder if Aiguamolls de l'Empordà should be moved to Empordà Wetlands or Empordà Marshes.Drunt (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-Up
Talk:Akabane Line

message: The Name Akabane Line hasn't been used since 1985.  This is part of the Saikyo Line now. JoeD80 (talk) 00:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in general public usage or signage, but it is still the official name, and it is shown in the current JR Timetable. --DAJF (talk) 04:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Gros Verdot

message: The article is quite clear on the fact that this grape was banned from being produced in Bordeaux.  I read the entire article twice looking for a reason why, but to no avail.  Surely that information is present in the offline sources cited tons of times on the article page? Seems kind of relevant.  Thanks, ☯.ZenSwashbuckler.☠ 14:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not stated directly (and so I didn't want to stray into WP:OR territory) but in sources like Jancis Robinson it was implied that the grape simply didn't make good enough wine for the Bordelais. AgneCheese/Wine 15:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for responding (and speedily). Is there a quote where that implication is given succinctly?  I would have guessed the OR/SYNTH component would have stemmed from the rootstock incompatibility described under #Viticulture and cited to the Lanigan & Edwards pdf. Alas that this has no entry on fr-WP! ☯.ZenSwashbuckler.☠ 16:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes, but '''why???'''
Talk:Og Kush

message: This whole article is fabricated and nothing more than fiction!  Please remove this as it is obviously just a joke. 
i agree completely its rubbish, thats why i made notes on the page to point out just that and direct the readers to a good resource.
at least part of the page won't be rubbish ;)
If you want a page to be deleted, you can nominate it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion. Also, when you comment on a talk page, it is standard to sign your comments with four tides (~~~~). Just for future reference. :) --Why My Fleece? 08:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I think the origin of the name 'OG' would be very relevant to this article.  Many people mistake the name as meaning 'Original Gangster', however it acctually stands for 'Odin's Gift'.  Odin is one of the main norse Gods.  I suspect it has signficant meaning to the original breeder of the strain.  I have encounter relative strains to OG Kush, such as Odin's Hammer, and Odin's Mercy.  
69.110.150.161 23:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OG= Odin's Gift 

message: it's a fact!
white people are black
its a fact!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.16.5 (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OG Kush is Chemdawg
Talk:Nesmé

message: I think that there should be a page that lists all the cities by location.  Such as 'North of the Sword Coast' which would vastly reduce the numbers of stubs.  Or we could organize them by size- metrapolis, cities, small cities, towns, and villages. Just an idea.
–Jawen Voc 08:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List by location
Talk:John B. Alexander High School

message: I see some people from the "Band" decided to vandalize this article. I fixed it to reflect a more neutral point of view. --Fairy Incognito 09:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tsk, tsk... 
Talk:Layo & Bushwacka!

message: I moved the page back. Layo & Bushwacka! is the correct title. Stu ’Bout ye! 09:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prizes Error 404  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.75.10.74 (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dracma
Talk:Grolleau (grape)

message: Some of the content in the Grolleau gris and Synonyms sections come from the merged stub Grolleau Gris. AgneCheese/Wine 23:03, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution note
Talk:Werckmeister temperament

message: Hi - Where did you get the numerical values for the Werckmeister tunings? Unfortunately they are falsely reported in many 20th century sources which were written by people who did not respect the original text or could not interpret it. Particularly the 'IV' or 'septenarius' tunings which have, in fact, nothing at all to do with 1/7 fractions of a comma. What Werckmeister actually said was that the septenarius could be tuned without thinking about divisions of a comma, instead he used exact integer ratios! So any values based on fractions of a comma are total misrepresentations.
I would recommend to obtain a copy of the original text of 1691 and check carefully to see how historically accurate your sources are. Otherwise you run the risk of passing on a false text.
Also, what is the point of giving the cent values to 3 decimal places? No instrument, let alone an organ, could ever be tuned to such precision!!
Best, --Tdent 21:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My main source is , which appears to be a scanned copy of "Wilhelm Dupont:  Geschichte der musikalischen Temperatur". If you find errors, feel free to correct them! You are right about the cent values. I will remove the decimals. Apus 09:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werckmeister - sources... 

message: Most (all?) sources appear to call the first temperament discussed Werckmeister III rather than Werckmeister I.  Referring to the third system Werckmeister wrote about as "Werckmeister I" is at worst original research and at best confusing and unsupported by convention. --Atemperman (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now the page uses two numbering systems for the Werckmeister temperaments: the standard one and a new one apparently made up by some author of this page.  I think this is confusing.  E.g. right now Werckmeister III is called "Werckmeister I (III)".  I fail to see how this helps readers.  Let's get rid of this and use the standard numbering only. John Baez (talk) 06:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbering system

message: The E value for the W I which is |\frac{256}{243} \sqrt[4]{2} ||392 | seems to be at least inaccurate since the cent formula would suggest 390. One could argue that 2 cents are not audible, but all the other numbers in the W I and W II tables are correct to 1 cent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.93.180 (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 390 is consistent with the ratio given. The value was unexplainedly changed twice . I have changed it back to 390. Burninthruthesky (talk) 09:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Talk:Glass Chain

message: How can Hans Hansen be involved? It says he was born in 1920?!?!? - So he was writing letters before he was born?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonraker™ (talk • contribs) 17:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question - I suspect our link is to the wrong Hans Hansen - there's one here, a Scandinavian jewellery design who appears to be the right sort of age. (1884-1940) I'll delve deeper. --Joopercoopers (talk) 16:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go. It's this chap -  --Joopercoopers (talk) 23:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Device paradigm

message: I think this is a critically important concept in the philosophy of technology. Part of Borgmann's critique of technology involves the way that the "device paradigm" is practically invisible, taken-for-granted. Borgmann's starting point is clearly Heidegger, but he takes it much further.
Here's part of the review in Netfuture. "While recognized by philosophers of technology as perhaps the preeminent American treatise on the technological society, Borgmann's book has nevertheless been -- within my own woefully restricted horizons -- the best-kept secret of the past fourteen years. It not only carries out, in the most thorough-going way, a razor-sharp critique of the "device paradigm" currently ruling our society, but it also strengthens one's hope for the future." 
But I accept that the significance of the device paradigm is not adequately conveyed by the present article, and I shall try to find time to improve it. --RichardVeryard 09:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Significance

message: I have added some information and citations in an effort to expand this article. I would like to highlight the previous (or probably original) Borgman reference (1984) used.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_paradigm#cite_note-Borgmannpage196-4 Aside from the name and page number, no other details were provided. I am unable to find this source, so I hope someone can help verify or provide the complete referencing. For questions about my edit, please feel free to message me. Regards. - Darwin Naz (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Indonesia/Archive 7

message: Soap box?
Thank you very much.
This is on the order of denying the holocaust.
Please try to check your own sources.
and come back with them and present them to peer reviewing please
and let me hear the responses you get.
Foreign Government officials in indonesia at 
the time, UK ambassadors, US officials have been 
interviewed acknowledging the facts. 
If you check the majority of credible unbiased sources,
universities, verifiable,documented literature on the subject 
or wiki articles in any european country
or try peer reviewing of the article with something more 
than conservative US universities, 
you should be able to get a better take on the subject. 
But this is really over the top.
It also diminishes the value and the credibility 
of Wiki to the point of rendering it useless to
any educational purposes.
Thanks a lot.
"soap box". Orwell Rolls in His grave.
213.172.204.59 03:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The onus is on the editor to find the sources - not the other way around. See WP:CITE. Please note that I am not so much questioning the facts you put here, rather i (and no doubt the other editor) are questioning (1) the way it is written and (2) the suitability for this article. Also please note changes I have made to the article that incorporate some of your additions. --Merbabu 03:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Suharto coup and the following massacres

message: * Here:coming more links and sources,book titles, scholars etc.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.172.204.59 (talk • contribs) 
:*No one is doubting that the sources are out there. As has already been said, it is the way it is written.--Merbabu 07:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: further notes &sources on the 1965 Indonesian Massacre
Talk:Otak-otak

message: Total different kind of food. No citation or verification that it is a variety of the main subject, the Otak-otak food. The section should be separate should be moved to a new article under the name Szczecin paprikas.
Sisiluncai (talk) 23:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Martinp (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate and move the Central Europe or Szczecin paprikas section

message: The start of the text
:Otak-otak ()
implies that 鲤鱼包 is pronounced "otak-otak", which of course is not at all the case. I have added toned pinyin to the hanzi. --Thnidu (talk) 09:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandarin pronunciation 

message: Terengganu otak-otak - White otak-otak , 0% tapioca , grilled with banana leaf
Muar otak-otak - Red (chilies) otak-otak , 40% tapioca , grilled with nipah leaf
Nyonya otak-otak - Orange (prawn) otak-otak , 50% tapioca , steam with banana leaf
Indonesia otak-otak - White otak-otak , 80% tapioca , grilled with banana leaf also can dip fried Megat Lanang (talk) 16:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The originally come from Terengganu or Muar
Talk:Rolf Stein

message: From what I can see in Google, he's clearly an expert on Tibet, but the article needs some work. I'll contact the author with some tips. - Mgm|(talk) 09:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My view

message: The article has expanded, and Stein seems notable enough to me. I recommend replacing the notability tag with a stub tag. Anyone disagree? Cmprince 22:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed 13 December. If there is still concern about notability, please discuss it here before reinserting the tag. Cmprince 17:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag?
Talk:Biloxi Blues

message: The article says that Barry Miller also played Epstein in the film of the same title.  This disagrees with the Wikipedia article on the film and also with IMDB, both of which say Epstein was played by Cory Parker.  Anyone know for sure?  Actually, it was Barry Miller the philosopher I wanted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.16.124 (talk) 09:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pok Fu Lam

message: can someone elaborate on Pok Fu Lam Tsuen (薄扶林村), I passed by there many times when I was living in the area and never really understood what it was.  Wikipedia has a chinese page for it if anyone can provide translation:
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%96%84%E6%89%B6%E6%9E%97%E6%9D%91
薄扶林村是香港一個歷史悠久的鄉村，位於香港島薄扶林，已有三百多年的歷史。清康熙年間三藩之亂時約有二千餘人從中國大陸避難到此，成為香港島的最早的原居民。當地居民過去曾多次要求政府給予跟新界原居民等同的權益，但被政府拒絕之餘，還面臨被清拆的命運。
 這是與香港地理相關的小作品。你可以编辑或修订扩充其内容。
* "Pok Fu Lam Tsuen is a village located in Pok Fu Lam on Hong Kong Island and which has a 300-plus-year history. During the Revolt of the Three Feudatories in the late 17th century, over 2000 people fled China for Pok Fu Lam Tsuen, becoming Hong Kong's earliest indigenous residents. Local residents have made several people to the government for recognition as indigenous residents on a par with those of the New Territories, but not only were these efforts rebuffed, they also faced the threat of the demolition of the village."
(The bottom line is just the "this article is a stub...." thing.)--61.224.41.117 (talk) 07:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas

message: It appears that Welshwalrus' contribution to the ASCOBANS Wikipedia entry on 04 August was placed in the wrong location. While ASCOBANS is a partner to the Year of the Dolphin (see ASCOBANS in the Public Eye), the Agreement is separate from the initiative. Factual information concerning the Year of the Dolphin should be placed on the entry for the Year of the Dolphin (also to be found on Wikipedia), but not on the ASCOBANS Site. Opinion-based information could perhaps be posted on the page dealing with that subject (in this case Year of the Dolphin) in a specified sub-heading that deals with external opinions, or perhaps such concerns/comments/criticisms/suggestions could be addressed in the Discussions page rather than editing the existing Wikipedia entry itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASCOBANSsecretariat (talk • contribs) 14:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of the Dolphin is not ASCOBANS