lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Terrax

message: I think a text free picture and more of a closeup of Terrax will work better. At least text free. Lots42 18:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Category talk:Record labels

message: this category should be subdivided into styles
:Yes, please use :Category: Record labels by genre. If an appropriate genre category does not already exist, create it. Mirror Vax 16:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As it is now, there is no access to the record labels, could that be changed please? 84.59.109.136 20:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So, where would I put Apple Records?! (The label owned by The Beatles which released in just a few years rock, pop, easy listening, electronica, classical, Indian, soul and quite possibly some other genres I've forgotten). Nope, I'm not sure genre is best, but I am certainly of the opinion that this issue needs some debate and some joint effort to sort out the mess. I've done a little today (mostly moving indie labels to :Category:Independent record labels and creating some subcategories for labels with multiple articles or at least one sub-category) but it's an uphill struggle. --kingboyk 21:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Been working on the above, and now all those 400 should be in at least a sub-cat by country and hopefully one by genre too. Lugnuts 20:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategorization

message: : P.S.: the seven "*" categories described below have now been filed into their own subcat, see Update subsection below.
I took the liberty to update/synch the sortkeys for three kind of subcategories. The page now gives (or gave):
* [+] Record labels by country
* [+] Record labels by genre
* [+] Record labels by year of establishment
; *
* [+] EMI
* [+] Independent record labels
* [+] Netlabels
* [+] Sony BMG
* [+] Vanity record labels
* [+] Vivendi subsidiaries
* [+] Warner Music labels
; +
* [+] Albums by record label
* [+] Artists by record label
* [+] Discographies by record label
* [+] Singles by record label
...
To document and explain the changes, the system works on this principle:
* A top-level space-sortkey for the 3 top-level "Record labels by XYZ" categories -- this groups the main ones that are expected for each article.
* A top-level star-sortkey for the 7 top-level categories of the Big Four, plus Vanity, Indies, and Netlabels -- this groups the ones that each article should fall into one.
* A top-level plus-sortkey for the 4 "XYZ by record label" categories -- this groups (and sets aside) this kind of related articles.
Of course, there may be reasons to update or tweak it, but I believe it's overall more practical (and consistent) than it was before. This is also in a manner similar to the doc I made at  about how to categorize a record label article. — Komusou talk @ 23:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sortkey update
Talk:Night Thrasher (Dwayne Taylor)

message: does it look to anybody else like he's punching Punisher in the groin in that picture? IS he punching Punisher in the balls? If so, excellent. If it's just badly drawn, thank you for the laugh anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.241.137.117 (talk) 22:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Namorita

message: When Wolverine fought Nitro, it was revealed that there's a "safe zone" from his explosions: anything or anyone that's close enough to his body isn't caught in the blast, a fact which Wolverine exploited to win the fight. Namorita was in direct physical contact with Nitro when he exploded. 71.203.209.0 19:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Outside of Bucky and Uncle Ben, how many people in the Marvel Universe are absolutely, positively dead?  I wouldn't be surprised to see her back someday.--Bedford 19:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Bucky's alive now. 71.203.209.0 23:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: That's actually Namora, not Namorita, who shows up during World War Hulk.  (Though she was thought to be dead until recently, too.)--Galliaz 14:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is she really dead?
Talk:Bannatyne v Overtoun

message: This case has been listed as the Portal:Law featured case as of October 20, 2005.  BD2412 talk 13:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured case

message: This case was the important precedent that, in 1977, allowed the "Continuing" Presbyterian Church to split from the Uniting Church when the Congregationalists, the Methodists, and the Presbyterian Church united to form the Uniting Church in Australia (UCA). The Methodists went over as a block, because all the church buildings went over to the new organization. The Presbyterians were able to split, because the church assets were split, according to precedent, between the uniting and the continuing elements of the church.
As in Scotland, the split in the church, and the division of assets, was the occasion of considerable bitterness. 121.200.27.15 (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia (United Church)
Talk:Bob Harras

message: # Removed part of the article that said Harras should receive praise for getting Claremont of the X-Men titles -- obviously nothing but bashing of Claremont.
--Groovemaster D. 18:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:June Brigman

message: I removed the following paragraph:
Too busy to bother drawing three new panels every day, Ms. Brigman frequently recycles the art from an earlier strip. (For example, compare:  
with ).  Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional.
One of the links is not working, but I did find the mentioned strips on another website. Although it's true that Brigman has recycled a panel from the previous day, this is common practice for many syndicated comic strips, especially for adventure/continuity strips where the readers have to be reminded of the plotline. Bust most importantly, I find that this paragraph reeks of POV with words like "Too busy to bother" and "Many comic fans and cartoonists consider this to be lazy and unprofessional." AEriksson 09:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit May 17th 

message: The introduction describes her as an "American comic book artist", and while June certainly has been that, at this point she seems to have spent more of her career as a comic strip artist. As such, "American comics artist" may be more appropriate. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "comic book artist"
Talk:Auer rod

message: I have tried to find a classic reference for this phenomenon. I was not lucky, but I sent an email to Barbara Bain, eminent haematologist in the UK. JFW | T@lk 14:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dr Bain gently reminded me to Google harder. The search yielded all-power WhoNamedIt.com, which has a long biography on Auer as well. JFW | T@lk 22:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kymellian

message: Wasn't BRB a Kymellian? He played a big part in one of the Thor story lines IIRC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.99.251.254 (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Beta Ray Bill
Talk:Zn'rx

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Safmarine

message: I know that following the full integration of Safmarine with Maersk well over a 100 jobs are to be axed in Antwerp. What I don't know is whether any operational presence will be maintained in Antwerp. If there is to be no further presence in Antwerp, the first section of the current article needs to be revised. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 16:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving Antwerp 

message: The article is woefully incomplete. 
There is no discussion of the sort of trade Safmarine handled, when the transition to containers was made, the older house style of the company, (if I remember rightly the older house flag consisted of three horizontal bands, with orange at the top, white in the middle and orange at bottom and the flag of the Republic of South Africa in the centre of the white band), or the company's use of chartered ships. Furthermore the history of the shareholding structure is so concise that it leaves a gap of 50 years entirely open to speculation. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 16:50, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompleteness 

message: The second sentence in the second paragraph must mean something other than the obvious, one can only wonder what? Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 16:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sailors selling their services
Talk:Loners (comics)

message: For some odd reason, Excelsior has been renamed into Loners on Marvel's site at http://marvel.com/universe/Loners .  Does this affect Excelsior's entry in wiki?  Sera404 02:18, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loners or Excelsior? 

message: Moved to Loners comics as per consensus. --Basique 22:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: Basically changed and added the following....
Shifted the spoiler warning from the ending of the "True Believers" into the issues of the mini.
Added Mattie/Spider-Woman to the "Attendees" and made Wilder/"Chamber" a "former Attendees".
Changed the info within the Upcoming Series Section, unless anybody wants to deleted this instead.
PaxHouse 17:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent updating 
Talk:Postojna

message: A photo of the cave would be nice. —Keenan Pepper 22:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo request 
Talk:Funky Flashman

message: I think there is enough evidence from various sources to at least mention the possibility that Funky Flashman (nice guy or NOT) is based on Stan Lee. Jack Kirby left Marvel on not so friendly terms and much has been written about how he (and his wife Roz) felt toward Stan. If you have read Ronin Ro's Tales To Astonish biography of Kirby, you will realize that it's not just fans, but Kirby and Lee's colleagues also saw something suspiciously familiar about Funky Flashman. It's enough to say that the outward appearance and speech pattern of the character is noticeably similar without having to go into the controversy of WHY he did it. Mr. ATOZ (talk) 17:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You make good points. But it does not matter. Stan Lee is a -real- person. This involves a different set of Wikipedia rules. You just cannot say Stan Lee resembles Flashman that way without loads and loads of info to back you up. And probably not even then. Lots42 (talk) 21:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Mark Evanier, in the afterward of the "Jack Kirby's Fourth World Omnibus" volume 2, repeats this claim.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaddeusMcMonster (talk • contribs) 00:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fourth World (comics)

message: Has DC announced whether or not the forthcoming Omnibus will include Jack's 1984 ending to New Gods, and/or the Hunger Dogs graphic novel? I think the information, if known, should be mentioned in the article.  -- Macduff 16:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omnibus 

message: One thing I've always wondered was why is it the "Fourth" World?  What does that mean? What were the other three?  Jccalhoun 15:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's always bugged me as well.  The most straightforward explanation is that it's an extention of the Cold War terminogy categorizing nations as belonging to the "Free World", the Warsaw Pact, or the unaligned "Third World".  Thus a new player on the global political stage (such as Apokolips) might be described as a "Fourth World".  Unfortunately that's rather prosaic by comicbook standards.  I'm hopeful that there's a more cosmic explanation in keeping with Kirby's bigger-than-life imagination. Asat 03:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Have you got a source for that?  Interesting if true. Macduff (talk) 06:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why "''Fourth''" World?

message: This article states that the Omnibus will include Kirby's unpublished "On the Road to Armagetto" conclusion, yet the cited references only mention that "Hunger Dogs" will be included.  Where is the information/claim about Armagetto coming from? -- Macduff 03:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Road to Armagetto 

message: Since Kirby's "Fourth World" is a storyline across several comic-book series, and in this context not a proper-name series itself, I've changed the article name. However, for no reason I can understand, the article title automatically and improperly italicized "Fourth World." Can any of my fellow editors fix this? --Tenebrae (talk) 22:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Meta series" infobox - it needs "|theme               = y" added to ID it as a thematic group instead of a series title. - J Greb (talk) 23:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Big Barda

message: Can someone give a little info on the character in Batman Beyond? That is the same Big Barda, right? I don't know much about her ... is she immortal or slow-aging or so? Shadowolf 12:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She's a New God, so I think that's the case. Noneofyourbusiness 01:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, so I just noticed this verb tense issue on another edit of mine. Forgive me, I'm new, but can anyone point me to  an explanation of this standard? It seems very weird to me, not encyclopedic and not like Who's Who or similar publications. Myke4 15:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Comics Project lists editorial guidelines; here's a link to the relevant section: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/editorial_guidelines#Present_tense  --Galliaz 15:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb tense 

message: Does she really use "aero-disks" to fly? Isn't that Mr. Miracle? In all the  scenes I remember, Big Barda fly by her own means... like in the main image of the article, to give a close example Perón 19:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flying 

message: What about the porno that Sleez made her do with Superman?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.153.178 (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porno 
Talk:New Genesis

message: The link on Notable Locations - Necropolis points to an anchor that doesn't exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.252.8.102 (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad link
Talk:Project Cadmus

message: "Its replacement was the OMAC Project, which created superhuman beings the government, via the spy group called Checkmate, could draft and empower any individual on earth to enact by any means necessary a way to control and conquer anyone on Earth it considered a threat." - This needs cleaned up, but I don't have the background knowledge to do it. And heaven knows I can't figure it out from the sentence itself... wikiing while drunk? --Grey Knight 21:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go at cleaning it up. Daibhid C 10:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unparseable sentence 

message: The entire article needs the attention of an expert, please. Lots42 (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire article 

message: I recently saw a Facebook page which referenced a Simon/Kirby story that featured a genetic engineering facility. It is found in a comic book published (1957) not long after the discovery of DNA (1953) - Harvey's Alarming Tales #1. You can read a review of it at the on-line Kirby Museum.
This seems like an interesting fact to mention in the article since Jack had a clear and recurring interest genetic engineering, e.g., the origin of HIM (Adam Warlock).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alxjhnsn (talk • contribs) 10:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier use of Cadmus name by Jack Kirby to reference a genetic engineering facility 

message: It's a evil lab and they turn alins in to weapons to get the alins to die when they arrive to plant earth 68.131.7.172 (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project capmnis
Talk:Joe Simon

message: I'm sorry, because Joe Simon's born is october 11, 1915. And non october 10, 1913
:Web: 
*
*
:...Thank you --Angelo.1961 00:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tweaked the article because it seemed to imply that by producing the first issue of CAPTAIN MARVEL ADVENTURES S&K created Captain Marvel! Cap was already appearing in Whiz Comics,an anthology that Cap shared with other characters. Reportedly, Simon and Kirby didn't sign their work in CM Adventures because they weren't proud of their effort on this occasion (which was inked by several people of varying talent), however,despite this claim, Fawcett had a strict policy against giving out bylines to anyone, perhaps even Simon and Kirby. In either case, CAPTAIN MARVEL ADVENTURES went on to become one of the best sellers of the Golden Age.MARK VENTURE (talk) 00:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll tweak it with proper citations. Shouldn't be a problem. Give me a couple of minutes. Also, please don't use all-caps for the titles of comic books. Italicize them, please, instead. Thanks. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: S&K DID NOT CREATE CAPTAIN MARVEL

message: This Wikipedia reader would like to know:  did he see Captain America: The First Avenger before he died, and if so, did he like it? 174.24.92.212 (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Simon see the movie? 
Talk:Metropolis (comics)

message: "was often shown as being within driving distance of Metropolis" rather relative a term. Unless you have to take a boat the tip of South America to Alaska is driving distance. Is there a better way to phrase this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.107.12 (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driving distance? 

message: Glenmorgan square was added to the Wikipedia article on  and later it was claimed the location appears in Superman Returns. The location is not mentioned in the movie's dialogue or script, and the alleged shot from the movie depicting the location is not in the movie.  The earliest official appearance of Glen Morgan square is in 2010 preview screenshots of DC Universe Online, a game which was released in 2011. A character named Glen Glenmorgan was featured in DC comics in 2011.Is Glenmorgan square mentioned in comics or other media published before 2006 when the location was added to Wikipedia? If not, this is a case of Wikipedia vandalism persisting for so long that it got incorporated into official material. ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 07:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glenmorgan square  

message: I think some sections of this article might go against WP:UNIVERSE: describing the city from the perspective of characters living in the fictional universe, rather than describing it entirely as a fictional city. For example, I think the sections on history, and on cultural, educational, and research institutions might be in-universe. I think the industry section is acceptable since Lex Luther plays a major role in Superman stories. Nine hundred ninety-nine (talk) 09:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, even though the content of industry section is acceptable, I'm not sure it should be under an "industry" header. Instead I think it makes more sense to have a section of the institutions that play a role in Superman stories, like LexCorp and the Daily Planet. Nine hundred ninety-nine (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Universe 

message: Mena 45.98.35.25 (talk) 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  بنايوتي مسيحة غبريال مينا نبيل 

message: Mena 45.98.35.25 (talk) 02:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  بنايوتي مسيحة غبريال مينا نبيل
Talk:Departments of Senegal

message: I just updated the article to include Keur Massar, the 46th department, created in May 2021. The source I used says that Keur Massar includes arrondissements Malika, Yeumbeul, and Jaxaay. I think these are all new, since Malika, Yeumbeul Nord, and Yeumbeul Sud appear only as communes in Niayes Arrondissement, and I don't see Jaxaay mentioned anywhere. Offhand I'd say this brings the arrondissement count from 103 to 106 but I'm not sure. This is why I placed the  tag next to the 103. Largoplazo (talk) 00:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of arrondissements 

message: By the way, this update probably has consequences in a number of related articles! As well as more in this one, as the Senegal and Dakar Region maps need to be replaced. Largoplazo (talk) 00:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of updates needed
Talk:William Hetherington case

message: Am not sure about this one, I suspect the original contributor could be pushing an agenda (note especially "Given the circumstances, many believe that the conviction was wrongful and that his wife lied." "Many"? Where is the source? "Given the circumstances" needed to be precisely explained)
Also, from a couple of media articles I have seen(but only one that I can actually link to), it looks like "wrongfully convicted" may be a little strong. As far as I can tell, the status of William Hetherington as "wrongfully convicted" is speculative and has not been upheld in a court of law. However I'm not removing it from the "wrongfully convicted" category: I'm prepared to admit there may be significant support for Hetherington - I'll leave it up to someone with more knowledge of the case and public opinion about it. Georgeslegloupier 14:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Stoke Newington railway station

message: I like this website a lot. Please do not pay any attention to any messages asking about pictures of Hackney Downs Station. They are just pranking you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.15.94 (talk • contribs) 
: Message received and understood. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)