lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cleavage (embryo)

message: The textbook I referenced has some of the information that I added but not all.  The information is, for the most part, verifiable through Google searches, looking at the context in primary literature and in the lecture slides posted online by various teachers.  If anyone has any better textbook or review article references to cite, please do so.  IlliniWikipedian 18:01, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Under Mechanisms, the link to "Asters" leads to a flower... This must be a mistake , 88.154.152.18 13:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to Asters 

message: Why is there a page for "spiral and radial cleavage" but no page for holoblastic cleavage. It seems like a very strange idea for a article; grouping two (of the four listed here) types of holoblastic cleavage together. I think there needs to be a separate page for holoblastic cleavage or just merge the spiral and radial cleavage page into Cleavage (embryo). Jack (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I tend to agree. This isn't a particularly long page and the articles aren't going anywhere fast. I merged spiral and radial together as well as determinate and indeterminate, but that was just a start. Merging both of them here sounds like a good idea to me. Just remember to add a merge template to this page too (multimerge is the one you'll want). Richard001 (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I've redirected this page as all the information (minus the links) was exactly the same. Jack (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Spiral and radial cleavage]] 

message: Some of the same reasons as above. They should be merged with cleavage as there is little content. Jack (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine with me. Richard001 (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay that's done, though I think I've put it in the wrong place. Anyone with a little more knowledge want to sort it out? Cheers, Jack (talk) 04:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Determinate and indeterminate cleavage]] 

message: In the summary, I'm not certain if the marsupials have radial, rotational or other type of cleavage (nothing was said about it in the books of Gilbert and Kardong). Comparing this illustration  (figure 11.21) and this other  (p. 46), I think they have rotational cleavage.Zorahia (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: One or two lines would describe the morula. Page includes details of compaction and blastocyst. Better presented on Cleavage#Compaction Iztwoz (talk) 16:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Morula]] into [[Cleavage (embryo)]] 

message: The redirect Cleavage stage, ovum has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TNstingray (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Cleavage stage, ovum]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Riemann hypothesis/Archive 1

message: :At 18th of March 2005 Dr. Fayez Fok Al Adeh presented a proof for Riemann Hypothesis at 
I have checked the proof and found some errors  
I wonder, if some other people confirm those errors I have found.
Kaufmann Friedrich
11:36, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the proof of Fayez Fok Al Adeh correct?

message: Mr. Kaufmann is confused between single and double integrals.He does not notice that the variables in the double integral are seperated in the inequality.
After seperating the real and imaginary variables after equation 9 ,the proof deals only with the real field,yet Mr. Kaufmann discusses the imaginary part again. [As for the next sentences, please remember WP:NPA --Army1987 17:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Under our policy, we cannot use original research in Wikipedia, anyway. We are not the people you need to convince. Charles Matthews 18:19, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fayez Fok Al Adeh:my proof is exact and correct

message: Hello Dr. Fayez Fok Al Adeh, thank you for your scientific based comments. 
Perhaps some other good mathematicians have an opinion to my paper too. I would be glad to hear
other opinions too.
Kaufmann Friedrich
12:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific attidude?

message: Since some mathematicians have problems with my paper  concerning the errors in Fayez Fok Al Adeh proof for Riemann Hypothesis, I have worked out a paper to show the comment 1.) each step which lead to a contradiction precisely . I hope that this comment is clearer now.
Kaufmann Friedrich 11:49, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More precise description of an error in the proof of Fayez Fok Al Adeh
Talk:List of highways numbered 25

message: Route 25 is also a road in Connecticut (runs N/S through Fairfield County and up to the Massachusetts border). There should be a disamb page rather than a redirect to Interstate 25. --Zippy 16:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arne Anka

message: I've made the article a bit less "stubby" now, and I'm wondering if the stub template should be removed or not? Anyway, someone should really put together an article about Charlie Christensen soon, as that is the only red link. kallemax 16:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Isn't this more similar to Howard the Duck than Donald Duck?
:In a sense, yeah, since both basically are satirical pastiches of Donald Duck from Carl Barks' comic. (The pseudonym Alexander Barks comes originally from an optician in Stockholm, I think, although he was named Alexander Bark and the s at his store was only a genitive.) 惑乱 分からん 17:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Howard 

message: "Krille Krokodil" does it really need translation? If then it should be that Krille is jargon for Christer (c:a "Christian"). Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Krille
Talk:Ganciclovir

message: This medication, in gel form, appears to be an effective treating for ophthalmic herpes 1 virus infections in cats:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9242719/
I would add this myself, but I have never mastered how to edit the reference section of a Wikipedia webpage. Ron Hines DVM, PhD 2603:8080:3F0A:7C35:D5C4:9A8D:FB20:3BB4 (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I added new section to the article. Ruslik_Zero 20:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ganciclovir veterinary uses
Talk:People's Progressive Party (Malaysia)

message: This link has been deleted from the article as it appears to be dead. If this is a temporary problem and the link works in the future then please restore it to the article.
*Official web site
If however the PPP have a new website, please include this in the article. I've had a search on the web but I found nothing.
--Spondoolicks 17:12, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website 
Talk:Wadhurst

message: Having lived in Wadhurst for my entire life I am quite sure it is a village not a town
--Machtzu 15:11, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or Village 

message: Might it be worth mentioning Wadhurst Park and Hans Rausing? Zephyr 09:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wadhurst Park

message: The Wadhurst History Society website has much info on Wadhurst which can be used to expand the article. Mjroots (talk) 03:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Research source

message: I'm highly sceptical of the claiim that 649 men from Wadhurst lost their lives in The Great War.  I know it's a factquoted in an article published by the BBC but it's almost certainly wrong.
If the population of the village was around 3,500 in 1914 we could reasonably estimate that the male population was just under 1750.  Of those perhaps half would have been under 18 years of age or over 41 (the ages for conscription, which until 1916 excluded married men) though the conscription age was raised to 51 by the end of the war.
Allowing for that it's highly unlikely that of the eligible male population (say fewer than 900) that 649 should have been killed and yet there be no collective recollection of the slaughter in the village, no mention elsewhere and no roll call of 649 names in the church or on the war memorial.   Aubers was a disaster for Wadhurst (commemorated by the twinning arrangement between Wadhurst and Aubers) and that involved 25 men.  If that even is remembered why is there no momorial to the other 625 casualties?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.24.165 (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The source given says 149 dead. This seems to be a typo in a good faith edit made by an anonymous user. I have corrected it. Thanks for pointing it out.--Charles (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War One Casualties
Category talk:The Rolling Stones songs

message: I'm listing this on WP:CfD per the somewhat one-sided conversation over at :Category talk:The Beatles songs. Please take a look over there for the rationale; if there's interest, I'll migrate the discussion over here. Blackcap | talk 17:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This was listed on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion, with a result of no consensus. An archive of the debate can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 November 8#Category:The Rolling Stones songs to Category:Rolling Stones songs. --Blackcap | talk 18:06, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to [[:Category:Rolling Stones songs]]?
Talk:Last man

message: added...George Orwells, Nineteen Eighty-Four's, working title was "The Last Man in Europe", which is presumably a reference to Winston Smith being a tragic hero not the only man left to stand upto Big Brother.Ouroborosdross (talk) 09:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but Nietzsche wrote later than Notes from Underground shared many of his own ideas... Nobody is claiming that Nietzsche came up the idea for the last man after reading Dostoevesky, only that Nietzsche felt a kinship to his ideas, esp. in the Notes From Underground novel. I have put Nietzsche quote about reading this novel into this article, along with a reference.Kathartic (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 21:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed the added paragraph because it was original research.  Nietzsche writes that he was overjoyed at having read Dostoevsky, not that the underground man is the last man.  Citing a blog as a reference does not satisfy wp:reliable sources.  RJC Talk Contribs 01:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc.

message: Hello, I stumbled upon the article Tschandala while perusing random links, and while I don't know much about this subject, it seems to me that the content of the orphaned article Tschandala. might be better off if it were merged into this article. Again, I'm not familiar with Nietzsche's philosophy, so I don't know if he saw the Last Man as an archetype of the more general Tshandala or what. Some feedback would be appreciated. Thanks. --Kyoko 13:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tschandala is no longer orphaned and would not really assimilate well into this article - the Last Man is a rather well-defined concept, and I see no harm in the two having separate articles. Oppose for now. Skomorokh incite 21:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine. Like I said, I'm not familiar with this material so I thought it best to ask first. I'm withdrawing the suggestion. Thanks. --Kyoko 22:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I would also oppose the merger.  Since it hasn't generated any consensus in favor of it over the past couple of months, can we remove the merge tags? RJC Talk Contribs 19:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: Reason why I put so much is because this article really needs to be rewritten and improved due to it's confusing nature, so sorry for saying the same thing three or more times...
— 2601:183:4000:D5BD:50A1:D7A3:EB27:52A (talk) 01:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Multiple Issues]] on 23 June 2016 

message: In German the word Mensch stands for human and not so much for race.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.167.125.100 (talk) 03:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of Letzter Mensch
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta

message: John Edward Brownlee has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[John Edward Brownlee]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]] 

message: We've begun a campaign to clean up gridiron football stubs that lack WP:SIGCOV as required by WP:SPORTBASIC #5. A big chunk of the deficient articles are for individuals who played for the Edmonton and Calgary CFL teams.  I am hoping that Alberta project members are familiar with sources that can be used to dig up SIGCOV and might be willing to help improve these Alberta-related articles.  We've also set up a talk page here for any questions or comments you may have. Set forth below is the list of Alberta-related articles we hope to improve. Your help is appreciated. Cbl62 (talk) 20:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmonton/Calgary CFL stubs need SIGCOV 

message: A discussion is taking place, which may effect provincial/territorial politician bio leads. GoodDay (talk) 20:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rene Levesque 

message: Would appreciate input at this RFC about Levesque. GoodDay (talk) 21:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  René Lévesque RfC
Talk:Courtroom workgroup

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Courtroom Workgroup →  – Neither one of these words is part of a proper name, this there's no reason for subsequent words in the article's title to be uppercase per WP:LOWERCASE. (I was going to just WP:BOLDly move the article, but there was a move request in 2006 that put the article at its current title.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 December 2022
Talk:List of P600 mountains in the British Isles

message: Why, if England, Scotland and Wales are listed individually, is Northern Ireland not listed separately from the Republic of Ireland? It just says Ireland, for both countries. That's not particularly helpful for discerning which mountains are on which side of the Irish border... 88.109.65.152 (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Ireland not distinguished in the table? 

message: Is there any valid reason that the prominence of Carrauntoohil is given in tenths of a meter while all other height and prominence measurements are to the closest integer meter? It makes it appear as though its (wet) prominence is not the same as its height which it must be given that it's the highest point on an island. Beowulf (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prominence
Talk:Domestic system

message: Yes, Of Course they should be! They are EXACTLY the same!
I have looked at the comments in which someone else proposed merges.  There are lots of assertions that they are different, but no further detail.  Please sign in, agree or disagree, provide detail why, and then sign your comment (4 tildes) Ehusman 03:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Personal finance

message: "If using a financial advisor, require them to commit to a fiduciary duty to act in your best interest" is misleading at best. Financial salespeople may not be fiduciary, but they are also not considered financial advisors. I understand that the statement is one of Pollack and Olen's quoted principles, but financial advisors are fiduciary by definition. The quote implies that financial advisors may exist who do not have a fiduciary duty, which is not the case in America. Should misleading information be presented by the article as a "personal finance principle?" Wouldn't it be more appropriate to include examples of principles (not all inclusive) which are not misleading?
BlackDahlia94 (talk) 22:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiduciary Standard

message: — Assignment last updated by Marek326 (talk) 19:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 1101 076

message: — Assignment last updated by Wfmira (talk) 16:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of Financial Planning II

message: Personal finance is a very important field using charts and tables may ease understanding the concepts that are constantly referenced in this article Jomotoso (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of Financial Planning II 

message: * Where should someone new to personal finance be directed to continue learning about the topic?~~~~
Koof99 (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New to Personal Finance 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lincol7 (talk) 13:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 111 First-Semester College Composition
Talk:Flag of Saskatchewan

message: I recall that for the first year or two of its existence, the flag of Sask was green over red instead of greenover yellow. Anyone else recall this? Ground Zero | t 18:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember the red and green flag: it remained popular well into the 1970s. The Flags of Canada, by Alistair B. Fraser, explains that it was the Diamond Jubilee Flag (1965).  If I were a better artist, I'd draw it and upload it, but — sadly — I suck. Indefatigable 22:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do not remember ever having red but thats pretty cool!
75.57.79.190 23:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I do not recall but cool! 

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it contains only the basic information on the subject, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Internet Stream Protocol

message: I've removed the  tag from this article.  It refers you to the talk page, but (until right now), there was no talk page, so it's unclear what was in dispute.  If there is something specific you think is wrong, please just fix it in the article --RoySmith 18:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Disputed

message: I have read several articles around the net that say that IPv5 was an experimental successor/extension of IPv4. This would make sense in principal (as 5 > 4), except that according to Wikipedia articles, IPv4 was standardized after IPv5. Now, unless I'm missing something, I don't quite see the point in extending protocols that don't exist. I also can't understand why the developers would skip over IPv4 and go directly to IPv5 (that is, if the Wikipedia articles are correct).
Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be any information around as to what IPv1 through IPv3 were. Does anyone know enough about the early internet protocols to start articles on them? Or are they not considered noteworthy due to their (assumed) failure?
82.5.57.238 (talk) 21:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My bet is that IPv4 might have been standardized after IPv5 was given - but probably the name IPv4 (and corresponding version number) was given out first. IPv0 through v3 were probobaly also experimental. This implies that IPv1 through v3 cover the TCP/IP protocol version before they were split up. IPv4 was then the strict IP protocol. Fresheneesz (talk) 04:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information 

message: I don't sure what the Internet Stream Protocol works? – Preceding comment signature by an anonymous user: 2405:9800:BA30:C21A:38C4:6837:DDCF:428D (talk) 06:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ST
Talk:German commando frogmen

message: Unless there are any objections I'm going to rename this page 'Kampfschwimmer' with either a mention of the WWII iteration or possibly split that subject off into its own page.Glorioussandwich (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move proposal

message: don't you think it would be better to split the article into a Kampfschwimmer and a WWII frogmen article?
Is this all about frogmen, and not about (badly translated) 'Marines'?
:: Here in Germany we don't have any Marines we only have our frogmen comperable to the SEALS. (This comment was added by me --Pentiumforever 21:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article split

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Kampfschwimmer, SEK M, Verwendungsgruppe 3402 and German commando frogmen are outdated. Through the restructuring of the Bundeswehr they are now the "Kommando Spezialkräfte der Marine (KSM)" (engl. Special Forces Command of the Navy). Source
--StillHere (talk) 17:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name outdated
Talk:Mehemet Ali (Turkey)

message: His name is actually spelled using two A's: Mehemet Aali, according to two encyclopedias.  A photograph of Mehemed Emin Aali Pasha is in the New World Family Encyclopedia (copyright 1957) (Standard International Library, Inc., N, Y. C.); and the New International Encyclopedia (copyright 1902 and subsequently) lists Aali, Mehemet, Pasha.  The (likely) mistake ought to be corrected.  TooPotato 18:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bernard Landry

message: The french version is proba
Why is there no mention of Landry's defamation of the Canadian flag (i.e. the "Red Rag" incident)?  This should most definitely be included in this article.
Why is there no mention the racist rant he gave while drunk after loosing the referendum?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.125.33 (talk) 21:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 15:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Charles Geer

message: I shamelessly lifted much of the basic biographical sketch from Cornell Maritime Press.  Until someone can collect more detailed information on Mr. Geer, that will have to do.  As a book illustrator, he usually gets second billing or no billing on dust jackets.  Are there any Wikipedians out there who may know the illustrator in person, or know how to get in contact with him for an interview?  If he served in World War II, he must be getting on in years, and time is running out. Quicksilver 18:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Need research help