Talk:Chemical Weapons Convention

message: The sentence "In 2009, Iraq declared five production sites which were destroyed in the 2003 war; OPCW inspections were still required." doesn't have any reference. I tried to look for them on the Chemical Weapons Convention site with no luck. Does someone has a reference?
Could it be that someone mistook the storage sites where the old chemical shells are kept for production sites?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.229.70 (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference was already in the Iraq section of the page which made the same claim but which you didn't remove. I have returned it to the other section as well. Rmhermen (talk) 13:48, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iraq production sites 

message: I moved everything older than 1 year to an archive, which can be found here. L.tak (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 

message: The "Progress of destruction" section uses the term "Category".  Is this the same as the three "Schedules" mentioned in the "Controlled substances" section?  If so, it seems like "all Category 3 declared chemicals" seems wrong since that's not actually required. -- Beland (talk) 13:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure if the article is fully correct and consistent (I'll check later), but Category refers to chemical weapons in a military sence(weapon filled with agent, chemical weapons not incorporated in weapon, empty weapons); while Schedule refers to types of chemicals that are declarable under the convention in a chemical industry sense (and determines how chemical industries should report on them: Schedule 1: chemical weapons and its direct precursors; Schedule 2: can be converted to chemical weapons; Schedule 3: plays a role in chemical weapons production). I hope that clarifies a bit... L.tak (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that clarification! I've found a source and added an explanation to this article and Chemical weapons. -- Beland (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories vs. Schedules 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chemical Weapons Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020181433/http://world.time.com/2013/09/27/syrian-chemical-arms-inspections-could-begin-soon/ to http://world.time.com/2013/09/27/syrian-chemical-arms-inspections-could-begin-soon/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The be a WMD, the chemical must be 'a liquid or gas' so Novichok agents slip through. Likewise, 3-methyl fentanyl, Kolokol can be classed as a riot agent. Of course, polonium 210 isn't covered nor is dimethyl mercury. I honestly think that a critique should be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.74.135 (talk) 12:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holes in the CWC 

message: An editor just deleted references to Syria having destroyed its CW stockpile.  I suggest an alternative.  The article could say that Syria has destroyed its declared stockpile, but has continued to use CW including suspected nerve agent in the recent attack near Idlib.
:Agreed, that is better.  TDL (talk) 17:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syria 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chemical Weapons Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081119233859/http://www.nacwc.gov.sg/ to http://www.nacwc.gov.sg/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified