Template talk:WWE

message: Can someone move OVW to former development territories? Markcookney (talk) 19:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: FCW was never a business of the wwe. it was solely owned and operated by steve keirn and had an agreement that the development roster of the wwe was trained there. Like the WWE did in the past with OVW, and HWA. Someone always changes this to 'defunct business' without even mentioning sources! TheAY1986 (talk) 22:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: FCW

message: Ohio Valley Wrestling has ceased affiliation with WWE, please remove it from the current developmental territories section and move it to the defunct developmental territories.--TrUCo9311 23:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why it says current by the ones that are current developmental territories.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 18:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  OVW 

message: I could just revert it back since there was no discussion to change it in the first place, but I will discuss it here first. WWE always goes in the order Raw/SmackDown/ECW. This is how they list the brands on their site, how they usually refer to the brands when talking about them, and (this one is a opinion) how WWE views the brands (i.e. Raw is the A brand, SmackDown the B brand, and ECW the C brand). This is how they should be listed here. There was no discussion to change this order, so I will support anyone who switches it back. TJ Spyke 17:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brand order 

message: *Oppose any color changes, because they are not necessary, and they do not improve the readability of the headings.    ArcAngel   (talk) ) 08:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is different than sports teams because the WWE isn't strictly about sports - they are an entertainment company, something much different than a sports team.    ArcAngel   (talk) ) 15:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are really splitting the thinnest of hairs here.  WWE has an iconic logo and the colors I chose for the template reflect that logo.  Also WWE is divided into 2 main groups (Raw and SD) each with it's own seperate distinct colors.  The main question is, why do you think it's OK for sports teams, and not an entity like WWE to have their colors reflected in their template. Vjmlhds 20:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Arc unless you bring up legitimate issues against the use of color in templates this entire thing is pointless...--UnquestionableTruth-- 02:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

text: After giving this some more thought, I have decided that this is no big deal, and have requested the template be unprotected.  I apologize for the trouble.    ArcAngel   (talk)) 22:43, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors, revisited 

message: Ya know...
This whole thing got started when I was just trying to add a little color to a boring drab template by doing it in WWE's colors (red, white, and black).
Little did I know, I was committing treason by doing so.
So let's have a vote once and for all to end this thing (even though no other template that I'm aware of needed permission to be colored).
I vote By God, Yes! it should be colored.  It doesn't affect the content of the article, there are tons of other colored templates (both sports and non-sports), and it brightens things up a little bit.  Vjmlhds 00:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The vote is on WT:PW, so don't make anothe one here. Crisis.EXE 00:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is ridiculous! 

message: Please add 2011 WWE Draft. Thank you!
--Hixteilchen (talk) 03:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Where? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 18:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  After 2010 WWE Draft. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, I see it now. , along with some minor code cleanup. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 20:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2011 WWE Draft]]

message: What's a "developmental territory" (group6)? 213.246.117.170 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query 

message: Wow. Those navbox colors ain't easy on the eyes. That's for darn sure. --Jtalledo (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: On that note, it's being discussed. Feel free to join: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling#Wrestling_companies_template_boxes_colors.3F Srsrox (talk) 17:27, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors 

message: 187.206.126.221 (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 20:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2016 

message: Change From: 
|group4= 
|list4=
*McMahon family
*Hall of Fame
*Former personnel
**A–C
**D–H
**I–M
**N–R
**S–Z
Change To: 
|group4=
|list4=
*McMahon family
*Hall of Fame
*Current personnel
*Former personnel
**A–C
**D–H
**I–M
**N–R
**S–Z Mrtonyntaylor (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . List of WWE personnel is already linked in the "header" bit; that's what  does. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 05:56, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2021 

message: For 2016 to present. Change to 2016 to 2020. Under history section. EliGap (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: There's nothing about 2016 (or any years for that matter) in History section in this template. If you mean History_of_WWE#New_Era_(2016–present), it's a different page and since the material includes Peacock partnership, "-present" makes sense there. hemantha (brief) 09:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2022