Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season/Chris

message: Finally, with Dvorak classifications of 2.0 (found here, Icelandic), NRL has it as TD3! -- RattleMan 00:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you and wow! THis is amazing. This might be a little like Hurricane Klaus or Hurricane Debby (2000). íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 00:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I realise that it is almost certain that the NHC will have this as TD3 shortly. However, the NRL is not offical and this storm is not a TD until the NHC says so. See what happened with 16-E last year. The NRL decided it was a TS and called it Pilar in the picture shown there. However, the NHC did not do so. Please don't start the Named sections until the NHC has declared things in future.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to revert, but I think as long as the header doesn't say "Tropical Depression Three", then it's clear it isn't official. Chacor 00:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, there just seems to be a pervasive first post mentality here these days.--Nilfanion (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be worse - look what Alastor's doing over "07E.FABIO". Chacor 01:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Here will be the sandbox article to work from until it becomes a land-threatening named storm: User:CrazyC83/0306 CrazyC83 01:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  03L.NONAME 

message: Confirmed by the NHC. Chacor 02:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any confimation. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 02:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nvm. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 02:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh dear, are we already discussing Tropical Storm Delta (see top and title of page)? —AySz88\^-^ 03:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a mistake for re-using page headers; we all make those (they need a template to base them on). This was hastily done in the last two hours, remember... CrazyC83 03:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text:  It is on the NHC web site now.  Please refresh your browsers.  I have updated the timeline, but have no time to do more.  --EMS | Talk 03:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This system probably isnt going to do much. They don't even forecast it to strengthen and all of the models dissipate it within the next few days. Too much shear in the area. bob rulz 03:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it will top out as a low-end tropical storm, unless the shear dissipates. We'll have Chris, but barely. CrazyC83 03:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After a week of disscusion, a moral argument, an archived part of this discussion, speculation, spliting the invest discussion into two, and then some more, we finally have a tropical system. Its sort of wierd how everything exploded within one advisory (including E-Pac). guitarhero777777 03:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Wind speed table shows about a 50/45 chance of that happening.Reub2000 03:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tropical Depression Three

message: Chris is gone from NRL. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 18:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh oh, Chris is back on NRL again! --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mm hmm. I'm quaking in my boots. NRL tracks anything that moves out in the Atlantic. Probably wise, but such a tactic would lead to many false alarms. Looks a bit better on the satellite but that's as compared to last night. It's over Cuba, storms don't form on land. However, given how warm it is in the Gulf, I won't completely dismiss the possibility of regeneration. Stranger things have happened in the Atlantic, but it's not all that likely. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 21:29, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I suspect that the NRL won't get rid of Chris until he's gone completely. I'm surprised they actually took him down in the first place. Pobbie Rarr 22:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the convection has increased significantly, but it clearly looks like a wave or trough right now. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it be reclassified as an Invest in that case? CrazyC83 22:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily; it is still the same system that was Chris.  See, for example, Hurricane Ivan. --tomf688 (talk - email) 22:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks pretty good on the sattlite and IR.--24.83.98.3 01:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks nice, but looks don't mean a whole lot when you're talking about storms. The remnant of Chris doesn't look like it has a low-level circulation to it. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 03:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. It still has some deep convection, but it's got no low-level circulation. bob rulz 06:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but Ex-Chris is barely anything right now. It seems more dead than alive as satellite pictures show (especially the infared ones). If wind shear continues in the northern Carribean and the Gulf, Chris will never seem to regenerate and even if it did, it would be highly unlikely. Alastor Moody (talk) 08:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think it's safe to say that Chris is dead now. bob rulz 19:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Remnants of Chris