lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anthotype

message: In my formatting I've cut out some of the pleasantries as well as the author's credits, as I did not think that an author was supposed to credit him/herself in the text; if I have overedited, my apologies, feel free to let me know on my talk page. (Booyabazooka 23:59, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This seems to be largely a rehash of http://www.alternativephotography.com/process_anthotype.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.241.165.229 (talk) 00:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagearism? 

message: I added a picture and some remarks to clarify the process. I created this picture using the anthotype process.
I added some more in Wikimedia.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Anthotypes
--Hutschi (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: If an anthotype is sensitive only to blue and ultraviolet, is it possible to make it last forever by keeping under a deep yellow filter?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.190.56.89 (talk) 07:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection of anthotypes
Talk:Houri

message: Do other editors agree that both issues have been adequately addressed at this point in the revision?
--Moonlight2001 (talk) 01:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Notice 

message: ... so is the singular form OK? Considering it is, I adapted the intro to reflect this, but is it? Arminden (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Confusing use of what seems to be the singular, see section on hadith: "descriptions of houri (or ḥūr)". If indeed the singular form, shouldn't it read "a houri" or "the houri", so with an English article? It stinks of "insider stuff", implying that either you speak koranic Arabic or you're the sucker and can be ignored. We're on enWiki here. Arminden (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you resolved this now? Speaking of en.wiki, why the "Koran" speak? This hasn't been a common spelling in English since the 1980s. Surely better to use standard spellings in questions? Iskandar323 (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name uses singular, Koran only plural 

message: The Koran "quotations": all the referenced source are only partially quoted in literal manner, all are reworded or paraphrased, so quotation marks seem to be misleading. Arminden (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Koran quotations
Category talk:Academic institutions/Archive 1

message: Before you get too far, I had a thought—because "university" and "college" seems to be an important distinction in the UK, I think there may be reason to have a separate category for each in this instance, with the only parent being "Universities and colleges in the United Kingdom".  I think if we do it that way, without having separate root categories for colleges and universities, we can respect differences where they exist (as the differences will, er, differ, country by country), but we won't be stuck with the split all the way down where it may not mean anything.  Postdlf 02:52, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual country categories 

message: I propose merging Category:Military academies with Category:Military colleges and universities.  As far as I can tell from Military academy, they are the same thing. -- Beland 04:27, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always thought the proper term was "military academy"—why not merge to that one and use that as the subcategory?  Postdlf 04:54, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: Yup, that was my fault. >_<  —John | Talk 05:02, Aug 20, 2004 (UTC)
OK, I've implemented the merger and move. -- Beland 02:46, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Military merger?

message: Category:Universities currently says:
>>Use a subcategory for the universities of a country, using Category:(-----) universities, i.e. Category:British universities or, preferably, Category:Universities of (country name), i.e. Category:Universities of Finland .
In the subcategory, include Category:Universities<<
We should decide on a single convention, no? -- Beland 04:27, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should follow the consistent practice evident under :Category:Universities and colleges by nationality—"Universities and colleges in [country]".  Postdlf 04:54, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Bowles Hall

message: There were a number of awards that had been given out over the years.  These included:
Clean Room Award: Given to someone by the A.S.S.H.O.L.E. either for having a really messy room, or for various other reasons.  The recipient would have his room filled with wadded newspaper, hay, etc.
Richard C. Cutts Boron Award: This was a plaque given to someone who "Knows Everything About Nothing, And Nothing About Everything"
Dickie Taylor Best Use of Side Room Award: This is a plaque given to the Bowlesman who made best use of his side room with members of the opposite sex.  Dickie Taylor was said to have been a resident in the 1960s or 1970s who was allegedly able to seduce anyone.  One story suggests that he spent the night with a woman who earlier that evening had been slow dancing with her long-time boyfriend.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.60.68 (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost Traditions
Talk:Spencer Compton, 1st Earl of Wilmington

message: Am I missing something?  If he died unmarried and without issue, how can he have descendants in the U.S.?   Davidz07 (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's some more (thanks especially to the DNB). Now does anyone have a picture of him that we can use? Timrollpickering 00:18, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any extra information to write a biography accurately. I’m desperate to write a full biography for him Primeminguy (talk) 13:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I will respond at User_talk:Primeminguy. Peaceray (talk) 14:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing biography 

message: Could someone tell me any events in his life I’m trying to fill his biography Primeminguy (talk) 08:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events 

message: It says in Compton's infobox that he was speaker of the House 1715-1727. This is contradicted in his successor, Onslow's infobox, saying his speakership began on 23 January 1728. Was there a gap in between? I notice that in the cited source it says ""; however, 3 paragraphs down, it says "", which is vague because "before the new parliament met in January 1728" could mean anything from  - 23(ish) January 1728. Additionally, GOV.UK's "history of government" says "." What's going on here? It looks to me that January 1728 is right. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Were speakers technically considered to be "in office" between Parliaments in the 18th century? Furius (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming yes, as even in the modern day, John Bercow's term isn't split up between Parliaments in his infobox. But you raise a good point. I'm not sure. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 21:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speaker of the House of Commons 

message: @142.67.114.138 - do you have a source for your recent edits? Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DoB
Talk:Macross 7

message: :This was the Macross Seven page... trying to integrate it into the main page.
132.205.15.4 01:37, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Panning M7 for having a few "giant monsters," while the original series pitted Earth against a whole race of them, seems silly.  Not to mention over half of the Protodevlin crew spent most or all of their time in more-or-less human form.  Plus, it's not as if original Macross didn't have its share of slow and repetitive eps, (opinions, anyone?) either.
Of all things to compare the mecha designs to, G Gundam?  Other than raw ignorance at some of mechadom's even stranger permutations over the years, I don't see it.  At all. --71.65.235.57 10:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Radical Departure"? 

message: This page should have more information on the characters, particularly the Protodevlin. For some reason, wikipedia has a bad "track record" when it comes to discussing the antagonists in anime series. Kouban 14:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More character information 

message: The section of this article (as it is on 12/26/2007) regarding the related manga refers to it as "Macross 7 Trash". Other Macross pages in wiki refer to the manga as "Macross 7 Thrash". Which is correct, and is the section in this article a victim of vandalism?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.68.222.12 (talk) 16:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga Name - "Thrash" or "Trash"? 

message: This synopsis is overly long, and isn't so much a synopsis as a play-by-play of the entire series. No offense to the work put into it, but it is somewhat mangled in terms of its writing, skipping back and forth between past and present tense. It violates Wikipedia:Plot_summaries, and should undoubtedly be shortened, perhaps with a list of episodes created that gives a short summary of each, a la most other pages about TV shows. So if no one minds, I'll be WP:BOLD and give it a go.Bakaprod (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Synopsis 

message: should include a link to Dynamite 7 since they're closely related  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.64.218.57 (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  macross Dynamite 7 
Talk:Studham

message: This is the first I've heard of the Blue Man; I wonder if it would have made a difference to my late teens when I spent many late, late nights on Studham Common making out in the car with whoever was my girlfried at the time! Do locals still use it as a makeout spot?Graham 02:56, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Wouldn't it be appropriate to tranfer the Towns and Villages in Bedfordshire item to the Bedfordshire article?--Kent Witham 06:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: Not worthy of comment in the main article, but perhaps of interest to a passing researcher, might be an “Auction Sale” by Connells, on 30 September 1970, of the “Antiques & Fines Arts” (and wine) of “Barwythe House, Studham — Bedfordshire”. JDAWiseman (talk) 21:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wine auction
Talk:Gotse Delchev

message: Goce Delcev is a Macedonian revolutionary Stojanmotoro (talk) 23:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 00:15, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2023 

message: Gotse Delchev is NOT a Macedonian revolutionary, as during his life there was no country of Macedonia. Gotse Delchev is a Bulgarian, as he has stated himself. Thus, you should remove the "Macedonian" in front of his name, because his nationality is Bulgarian and Macedonia was just a geographical region at that time. Macedonia is well-known for stealing neighbouring countries' history and instilling false ideological beliefs about their country. 
hihttps://m.dnes.bg/obshtestvo/2022/02/06/pravnukyt-na-goce-delchev-sam-si-e-kazval-bylgarin-sym.519529/amp 77.236.189.29 (talk) 14:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2024 

message: 77.28.16.69 (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please provide your request in a 'change X to Y' format and provide reliable sources for your claim. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 16:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2024
Talk:Vampire number

message: My first mathematics article. Please edit mercilessly. :-) Mindspillage 03:55, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: 7 is a vampire number, eh? Alexander 007 11:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at that table one more time. Frigo 21:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

text: No, they are just a bit of recreational mathematics. Weird people like me spend time on them for fun. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

message: Where are the vampire numbers of other bases? —Pengo 06:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am Jens K. Andersen mentioned in the article. I have studied vampire numbers but not seen mention of other bases. "in a given base (usually decimal)" was added to the article in  by an IP address with no source or edit summary. I have just computed the first vampire numbers in bases 2 to 10 and only the base 10 sequence is in OEIS. I have reverted the IP edit since we have no evidence that vampire numbers have been defined or studied in other bases - before my original research a few minutes ago! PrimeHunter (talk) 02:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I found a French page  with other bases. It looks like a selfpublished website. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the research! I didn't actually notice that "usually decimal" bit. Just that vampire numbers are base-dependent and don't seem to have any special reason for being restrained to base-10. —Pengo 03:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other bases 

message: *The first few prime vampire numbers are: 117067, 124483, 146137, 371893, 536539 
Are there other PVN which are not square PVN ?? Nico92400 (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was asked long ago but I didn't see it before. There are lots of other PVN which are not squares. The next is 2579×4013 = 10349527. I found the largest known PVN and the only reason it's a square is that large square PVN could be searched much faster with my algorithm. I guess almost all PVN are non-squares. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks for the answer Nico92400 (talk) 12:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prime vampire numbers (PVN) 

message: Is it appropriate to include a list of all vampire numbers up to a certain length? (Say 10).
There is also interest after pandigital (9-digit and 10-digit) vampire numbers. Can lists of them be included in Wikipedia?
If not, maybe a link to a site which has them?
Even the OEIS does not list them (only a few).
Is this considered original research as the number of known vampire numbers is still growing?
Bcurfs (talk) 09:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List them?
Talk:List of Pokémon episodes (seasons 1–13)

message: Okay, this is thinking back 19 years ago but I remember when Pokemon was getting on TV in the states it had the terrible 7:30 AM time slot on UPN and it started on Labor day 1998, Monday September 7th. The episode they aired was the SS Anne episode, would it be wrong to modify the first broadcast date for that episode because of what I remember waking up early on that day off from school? In the Nintendo Power promotional video for Pokemon it shows the TV Show starting on September 7th. Here's a capture someone had of the VHS and put on youtube, timestamp is when they say the TV show will start. hhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa_-wMvF-wM?t=9m44s
Could this have just been my local Metro Detroit UPN station messing up broadcast order or did it happen to other Pokemon addicts back then?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:EFC3:5300:7C46:370A:F934:808D (talk) 05:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Broadcast date wrong for SS Anne episode?  

message: The page mentions the English-language division is based on the opening sequences rather than production seasons, but from what I can see, this definition would make "Pallet Party Panic", "A Scare in the Air", and "Pokéball Peril" episodes of Indigo League, rather than Adventures on the Orange Islands because of they start with "Pokémon Theme", not "Pokémon World". Or are there variations of these episodes that start with the "Pokémon World" opening? TardisTybort (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adventures on the Orange Islands episodes 

message: I think season 1 has 85 episodes and season 2 has 33 episodes. Please check and make correction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.132.14 (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of episodes in season 1 and season 2
Talk:Royal Automobile Club of Australia

message: Couldn't this and the 21 other RACA articles be turned into just a few articles? Wikipedia articles can have sections to divide the content up, they don't need to be split into dozens of small articles. Also, I notice that these pages tend to assume that the reader will want to read a page and then progress to the "next" article. That doesn't really take advantage of Wikipedia's hyperlinked nature. Rather, readers should jump from concept to concept when they see a link they're interested in. So I don't really like the pattern used here that just intends for readers to go through these articles like chapters in a book.
Speaking of chapters, the RACA Origins at one point instructs the reader to "see Chapter XX". So clearly this was not orignally written for Wikipedia. The note on the original version of the RACA article implies that this was put here with permission or perhaps even by the author... is Jez Ford the author? It would be helpful to see some info about who wrote this and whether permission was given to post it. Right now I'm leaning toward thinking that Jez Ford is the author or an authorized representative (in this case, the publication editor) of whoever wrote this; In all likelyhood this was written by RACA. But it would be nice to see an "official" note on this discussion page regarding the original author and granting the necesary permission... keeping in mind that once it's put here it becomes GNUFDL.
And regardless, these pages definately need to go onto cleanup. There's no wiki, and it's written in a non-encyclopedic style. Just my ten cents worth.
- Eisnel 04:15, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stuck in the Middle with You

message: Just the lyrics and a couple links. The uncontested opinion at Wikipedia:What's in, what's out#Songs is that lyrics do not belong on Wikipedia. Livajo 05:15, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ''From VfD:''

message: Perhaps it is worthwhile to mention it is commonly incorrectly attributed to Bob Dylan.  Plus Grateful Dead...
I don't think he even did a cover... though some people claim he did.  Not sure what's true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.22.208 (talk) 05:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because according to Gerry Rafferty and Joe Egan, they only wrote the song as a pastiche of Bob Dylan songs.  They were dumbfounded when it became a hit.  - Lisa (talk - contribs) 09:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Dylan myth 

message: On at least one of the UK DVD editions of Reservoir Dogs (it's on the "LIMITED 2-DISC COLLECTOR'S EDITION" that was sold in a steelbookesque packaging that looks like a fuel can, don't know if it's on the normal 2-disc edition or blu-rays or US versions) there's an audio interview with Gerry Rafferty hidden under the K-billy super sounds of the 70s menu on disc 2. He talks about writing the song & the idea behind it, it getting used in the film and reaction - I'd have to listen to it again but iirc he agreed by mistake not realising what sort of film it was and says he doesn't like violent movies. 109.224.137.121 (talk) 22:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerry Rafferty interview about the song & it's use in Reservoir Dogs on special edition dvd 

message: The video seems to show Egan singing the lead vocal, but the article says Rafferty sings the lead vocal.  Would it be a mistake to construct a personnel section from the video?CountMacula (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Vocal 

message: In the article, the person sitting in the middle of all of the clown actors is incorrectly credited as Gerry Rafferty. It's very clearly Joe Egan that's in those scenes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.206.77 (talk) 07:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:Lists of New Zealanders

message: Kiwis and other friends who like putting articles in categories could have a look at the currently rather thin :Category:New_Zealand_people. Some of the (currently ten) specific categories in this article are appropriate for creating more subcategories of that one (currently four). Individuals who really can't or shouldn't be thus categorised can be added to the bottom half of that category page, where there are currently only four, some of whom may well be as good or better in one of the subcategories. Confused?... Robin Patterson 06:11, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: This thing is getting a little long, especially all the architects, few of whom are really famous. I would suggest that: 
* This page perhaps be limited to 20 names per section
* Only names with articles on this page. 
* We can have List of New Zealander architects' type pages with the whole list on them
* Perhaps cut down a few sections
* Literary should have some names in it.  - SimonLyall 09:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to remove all the redlinked articles in a few days and move them to Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand as a first start to cleaning out this article - SimonLyall 01:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saved Robert Laidlaw (well Jesus did actually). Anyone want to save Lana Coc-Kroft? I see other famous redlinks there that deserve their own article. Perhaps seeing how many hits they get on Google could be used as a rough indicator of their notability?  rossnixon 09:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting too long. 

message: Is John Walker still a famous runner?
Sarah Ulmer has just retired from all cycling?
Should people remain on the list long after they stop participation? rossnixon 00:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand you might argue that many people are not notable enough to be featured here until they retire and their careers can be judged on retrospect. dramatic (talk) 02:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove after retiring

message: As the splitting up of this list concludes, I suggest that it be moved to Lists of New Zealanders. (See Lists of Australians for a parallel  (and an example of improvement which could be made). dramatic (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the move. I've done a bit of reformatting of the article to include multiple lists under some headings.-gadfium 18:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

text: We'll need to split off or remove the remaining names under the Religion and Other sections first.-gadfium 18:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: I've moved those I can from the Other section to existing lists. I don't feel it's worth creating new lists from the remaining names, since those lists would have only a few entries each, and not even begin to be comprehensive. I propose we simply delete the remaining names and then rename this article.-gadfium 22:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Remaining names
Talk:Artem Mikoyan

message: Of course we are not saying that the beautiful Fulcrum was designed to become the cause of WW3.  KnownAnon (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causing WW3