lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Make Mine Music

message: I don't know if this is the right place to post, but the dutch title for Make Mine Music is wrongs, it says in english " Make Music of the Mine. ", This is babelfished and should be removed soon.
This is'nt even released in dutch, so why does it have a bebelfished title? Scrooge McDuck 19:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ANyone who knows the budget. In Gabler's book about Disney, it was set to be 395,000 dollars only before it went into production, but it says nothing about if this is the amount of money that was spent, or if it was made cheaper or more expensive. 84.210.60.115 (talk) 15:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The budget

message: There is a story that Prokofiev composed "Peter and the Wolf" specifically expecting that Disney would animate it (and Disney implied this on an episode of his TV show). However, I can't find a hard reference to this. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration for "Peter and the Wolf"

message: An editor,  - continues to make additions to the article, ignoring the WP:CRYSTAL guideline.  In addition, the additions are unreferenced. Onel5969 (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , thanks for opening the perfunctory discussion.  The content needs to be sourced, I also have a problem with it because it's incoherent and not formatted properly. What does " it was kept And Uncut On Blu-Ray In 2015 Disney Movie Club Exclusive" mean? Why Are We Writing Like This? Why is there suddenly a bullet point in a section that contains prose? If the editor hasn't figured out by now why the content is problematic, either we have a WP:COMPETENCE issue or it is deliberate disruption. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CRYSTAL]] violations
Talk:The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad

message: There should really be a separate article for The Legend of Sleepy Hollow (Disney film), as the film is a separate and distinct entity which has no relation whatsoever to The Wind in the Willows. LOSH has been available as a separate entity since 1958. The fact that the two divergent movies were originally glommed together should not deny this separate film its separate and rightful article, since it was removed from its strange bedfellow in 1958 (9 years later). Softlavender 00:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need two separate articles

message: Someone should post an ad about the differences between the books and the movies! Aslan10000  —Preceding undated comment added 04:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences

message: Cyril Proudbottom, the shire horse who is Toad's travelling companion, is based on the voice (and to some degree the apperarance) of Lancashire comedian George Formby, who made several films in the 30s. see IMDd trivia http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042044/trivia and POPULAR PICTURES OF THE HOLLYWOOD 1940s by John Howard Reid, sampled on http://cheap-reads.com/sample/50232/popular-pictures-of-the-hollywood-1940s
PeterHale (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information - Characters 

message: Some sources list Alec Harford as being in the movie, though some sources say that composer Oliver Wallace voices the character that Harford has voiced. Which is right? --47.20.35.189 (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice actors

message: Ichabod's horse is Gunpowder while Daredevil is Brom's horse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:242E:4800:4D86:EC0E:F095:CF55 (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ichabod's old plowhorse is actually Old Gunpowder while Brom's horse is Daredevil.
Talk:The Sword in the Stone (1963 film)

message: Rotten tomatoes said that it got a 67% approval based on 30 reviews.  Evope (talk) 15:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: RT info is already included in the article. DonIago (talk) 16:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  rotten tomatoes
Talk:The Rescuers

message: In the infobox it's said that the budget is $1.2 million. Then in the Critical Reception section, it's said it's "nearly $8 million". If the latter uses a figure adjusted for inflation, it should be mentioned in a note.</p>
Also, that long quote from TV Guide mostly recaps the plot, which is meaningless in this section. It should be cut down to just the critical part, which is the first sentence only.
Also, the first three lines of the section are box office data, not critical reception. The section should be renamed "Reception", with sub-sections named "Box Office", "Critical Response", and "Accolades", as per Wikipedia's usual way. Kumagoro-42 00:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request, 10 May 2015 

message: Should we mention how this appears to be then  first to break into this genre? After Disney did this in 77 you had The Devil and Daniel Mouse in 78 then The Secret of NIMH in 82 (and then also by Bluth, An American Tail in 86) and they all use a similar furry animation style. Mickey was earlier but he never had fur or looked as realistic. ScratchMarshall (talk) 18:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mice movies

message: Tragically child actress Michelle Stacy who voiced 6 year old Penny abandoned her own children and was arrested in 2019 for selling drugs in the desert outside of Los Angeles.  
https://www.vvng.com/police-arrest-hesperia-couple-accused-of-leaving-children-home-alone-to-sell-rock-cocaine-in-la/ Steelmelt33 (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:All Saints Catholic High School (Ontario)

message: Hello this is Darth Mhaw. I'm new to Wikipedia and hope to make new changes that will benefit all. I have created this page on All Saints and I will continualy update it. Thank you very much, that is all.
--Darth mhaw 00:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for making this page I see you are editing this yearly and i was wondering where you get this info from because I would like to learn more about this school. Autorec (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am assessing this article as Start class for the wikipedia schools project.WikiManOne (talk) 01:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment for [[WP:Schools]]
Talk:Tarzan (1999 film)

message: There is no reason to link to commonly understood terms. Please see WP:OVERLINK.
This is a cartoon. The specific species of various animals is neither specified (in the film or in sources) nor relevant. - SummerPhDv2.0 03:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinking and OR 

message: can you explain why you restored the original? Banedon (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, there. I restored the previous plot summary as per WP:BRD rather than risk a potential edit war. I'm also concerned about the potential scene-by-scene recaps, which should be avoided per WP:FILMPLOT. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:FILMPLOT doesn't say avoid scene-by-scene recaps. It says avoid scene-by-scene breakdowns. The differences in the two sections of the text look superficial, except one version does not mention the stampede at all, and I don't see why. Banedon (talk) 05:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment, the WP:STATUSQUO version of the plot summary doesn't include the opening stampede, since it could be a minor detail and plot summaries are meant to be concise. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you suggesting the stampede is a minor detail? Are you also suggesting that there is an edit war ongoing over the section? Banedon (talk) 07:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a quick word regarding the invoking of STATUSQUO. First and foremost, this is an essay, not a policy or guideline, but it is a common behavior during a dispute that shares the spirit of existing policies WP:EPTALK and WP:NOCON. As noted in its guidance, the purpose of doing so is to reduce "the risk of an edit war"; it does not say you must already be in one. Seek consensus, and when it does not work through editing, take your efforts to a discussion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot rewrite
Talk:Imoen

message: --Niemti (talk) 14:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm giving it 1 week before redirecting 

message: yayyy the article is back ^^ 192.164.50.15 (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just like old times, well except for the torture and all
Talk:The Reluctant Dragon (short story)

message: I think the Disney animation ought to be split off into "The Reluctant Dragon (animation)", to allow a fuller treatment of the book and other adaptations. Mon Vier 12:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Error?
This article makes it sound like that poem the dragon wrote is in Grahame's version. But I don't see it anywhere in the original story.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.111.149.137 (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it either. I'll remove it. ssepp(talk) 21:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:So Dear to My Heart

message: How come they didn't have the 1991 VHS? If I have then it will be RARE to find. -- Rod14 (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Walt Disney's So Dear to My Heart Part 5
As was now standard practice, elaborate storyboards
were drawn for each scene, and careful thought
was given to the transitions from live action
to animation and back again.
These are extremely well handled in the film,
most memorably in the first animated segment,
where Danny the lamb is shown romping
through various pages of the scrapbook.
He reaches a fence and starts to leap over it,
when the camera cuts to live action and the
live animal bursts through Granny's screen door.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.182.147.171 (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  15 subjects
Talk:James Kerr (Texas politician)

message: Since the article about Kerrville references him as a soldier, I named this page "James Kerr (soldier). I can't think of a better qualifier. "Texan", "Kerrville", "historical figure"--they all seem weird.Ckamaeleon 00:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: So,  here's one for you rights/license pros: a HUGE chuck of the text was lifted from [] page. Since it's the text of a historical marker, I would THINK it would be classified as "a work of the federal government" and therefore be public domain. HOWEVER, I'm assuming the dept. of the interior wrote it. Maybe the state or local gov't or even historical societies create historical markers. I don't know for sure. But if that's the case, it means this text needs to be rewritten to remain in wikipedia.Ckamaeleon 00:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Licensing Question
Talk:Gone Fishin' (film)

message: :But while filiming a stuntwoman died and her husband was injured because they had to drive a boat off a ramp over a mangrove and in between two boats.  Instead of working out the boat fell on a crowd of extras.
As soon as somebody can provide a source for this, I'll put it back into the article.  --Merovingian {T C @} 22:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply googling for "Gone Fishin accident" reveals her name, and a follow-up googling of "stuntwoman janet wilder" then gives several sources describing this accident. Here's but one: http://www.chicagoartistsresource.org/?q=node/15376 85.227.226.235 (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I added it.  --Merovingian (T, C) 19:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporarily removed material 

message: A section on how well the film did would be nice, especially for a bomb like this ;-) 85.227.226.235 (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reception 

message: "The film was given a "PG" certificate from the MPAA for "violence and some mild language." 
This was somewhat silly considering the film only uses 2 profanities - "What the hell is it with these damn coupons?" - said by the 'Glory Glades' manager when questioned by the con artist if there still honoring free coupons. As far as the violence is concerned it is all slapstick."
This was included in the article but it is an opinion and thus belongs on the discussion page. WesUGAdawg (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your removal.  Thanks for your help! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings opinion
Talk:Sesame Street in Japan

message: Wouldn't there be a Japanese way of writing it (like "Sesame Sutoriito) or something? --Alexie 19:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the series 
Talk:Federal Palace of Switzerland

message: Note that the parliament allows use of the (nice) images from  without any restriction; I have received a confirmation by email today and have sent it to Wikipedia/permissions (I can also send it to anyone who would like a copy). I have just uploaded the image of the dome on commons, but don't hesitate if you want to add another picture here. Schutz 00:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Batman: Mystery of the Batwoman

message: Man, this page had some ugly stuff going on in it.  I've made some improvements, but I'm not sure if it's going in the right direction.  FrozenPurpleCube 02:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Do you think it's worth a mention that "Betcha Never" totally breaks the  1920s/30s (sorry, not good with era) feeling that the animated series had maintained excellently up until now? I know that I felt really put off when I heard a modern pop song. (Darien Shields 19:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'd say it is more of a film noir feel, the series, not the song, which yes, is modern pop.  I'm not sure if it's the first vocal song in a DCAU show or not.  Well, other than that musical about Batman. FrozenPurpleCube 04:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff 

message: Why dont the justice league appear in this cartoon?
JLA (animated series was produced before this)
:Because it was a Batman movie, made to promote that character, possibly intending to promote the then-upcoming live action movie, and not a Justice League one.  You'll see the same thing in the new Superman animated series.  FrozenPurpleCube 22:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  JLA 

message: Can someone citate where was the romantic relationship with Batman and Carrie Kelly??--Hokgwai 17:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TRIVIA 

message: Why wasn't Paul Williams as penguin for this movie, he was penguin during the show? -- WarioLoaf 11:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PENGUIN 

message: I really don't see how the cast could be listed in prose format.  Every other film I've seen on Wikipedia uses a table to list the cast, just as this one does.  As such, I am going to check for specific wiki-guidance, and absent any, drop the tag. Boomshadow 01:48, 03 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CAST

message: I've never seen this book, so I can't cite it first-hand.  However, see http://oldbooksreviewed.wordpress.com/another-book-review-blog/list-of-novels-based-on-comic-books/batman/ where it lists:
Batman: Mystery of the Batwoman junior novelization by Louise Simonson (Bantam, 2003)
http://www.amazon.com/Batman-Mystery-Batwoman-Louise-Simonson/dp/0553487779/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1345418027&sr=1-1&keywords=Mystery+of+the+Batwoman adds:
Product Details
*Reading level: Ages 8 and up
*Paperback: 176 pages
*Publisher: Bantam Books for Young Readers (October 14, 2003) 
*Language: English 
*ISBN-10: 0553487779 
*ISBN-13: 978-0553487770 
*Product Dimensions: 7.9 x 5 x 0.5 inches 
*Shipping Weight: 4.5 ounces 
Hope this helps! Darci (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In other media
Talk:Tintin and the Blue Oranges

message: The movie poster appears to belgian rather than french , as it is bilingual (french/dutch)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.117.24.161 (talk) 22:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The animal decoys are used to get Tintin & Haddock into the hacienda, not where the Professors are being held.
--Andrewdotnich (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight plot errors
Talk:Tintin and the Temple of the Sun

message: The title of this entry is just plain wrong, and should be changed. Although a direct translation of the French original, the title “Tintin and the Temple of the Sun” hasn’t been used in English: it is either titled “Prisoners of the Sun”, the English title of the book called “Temple du Soleil”, or for some certifications and releases it is called “The Adventures of Tintin: The Seven Crystal Balls” and “The Adventures of Tintin: Prisoners of the Sun” - the names of the two albums the film is adapted from. Although the separate titles are often given on packaging, on media and (often) superimposed on the screen at the start of the movie, the film was designed, made and released as a single entity, and there is no break or intermission to show the end of the first book, and the start of the second. Jock123 (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title is never used in English 

message: There is no verification of the English cast, not even on IMDb. 84.65.73.215 (talk) 08:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Cast
Talk:Tintin and the Lake of Sharks

message: Apparently, there exists two different comic versions of the film. One original drawn newspaper adaptation and one "fumetti" version based on the film cels (with the last one being officially released as an album). Strangely enough, the figures in the two different versions are almost identical, and I don't know whether it's due to the drawn figures originally being traced from the film cels, or if the drawn characters were edited and superimposed onto the original cels. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The book version isn’t cels or images from the film, as is suggested in the article. The newspaper strip, which was published in the Belgian Le Soir, and drawn by Bob De Moor and the Studios Hergé team, featured completely redrawn figures and backgrounds telling the story; this was adapted to colour and published in the Dutch Pep magazine, issues 22 to 42, in 1973 (then in Dutch television guide Televizier Avro in 1974). It was decided for the book version to keep the figures from the strip version, and to place these over backgrounds from the film, making the final book a combination of film art and strip characters. Jock123 (talk) 16:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comic versions

message: Hello, just a stupid question. Why is the lake called Lake of Sharks? There are no sharks in lakes, and there are no real sharks in the movie. And why is the submarine in the shape of a shark? :-) Ziko (talk) 16:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharks?
Talk:Tintin and I

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Over the years there has been the occasional attempt to try to move (rename) this page from "Tintin and I" to "Tintin and Me", the latter of which is incorrect grammar. (En français, "Tintin et moi" is correct grammar.) Kids say "Billy and me" but when they grow older and speak correctly they say "Billy and I". One rule of thumb is to try removing the "Jeff" from either "Jeff and I" or "Jeff and me" and add "went to the store" and see which works: Is it "I went to the store" or is it "Me went to the store"? 
A Wikipedia editor has somewhat recently taken the bold but unfortunate step of moving this page to the literally translated but incorrect grammar title without consensus, stating (with incorrect grammar), "surely a more accurate translation, and the one used the BBC". Surely not; the BBC has translated it incorrectly, but PBS got it right (www.pbs.org/pov/tintinandi) and the subtitles of the actual show got it right (www.youtube.com, go to 3:56). This page has now been moved back to the correct title. If any editor wishes to comment, please do so below. Prhartcom (talk) 13:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct grammar of title
Talk:Dano-Norwegian

message: I think this article needs some revision. Firstly, the term Dano-Norwegian isn't primarily derogatory. In addition to being an adjective concerning Denmark-Norway up until 1814, it may be used by anybody with reference to the official language in Norway during most of the 19th century. Also, many linguists, be they Bokmål users or Nynorsk users, denote Bokmål and/or Riksmål as Dano-Norwegian scientifically, not derogatorily. Secondly, when describing the secondary, pejorative use of the term, the article must avoid being pejorative itself. --Eddi (Talk) 00:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and look forward to seeing this rewritten. In the English language Dano-Norwegian may be a noun used [primarily] by linguists in a more esoteric/scholarly manner to refer to Bokmål. It may also be an adjective referring either to anything relating to both Denmark and Norway (e.g. "Dano-Norwegian joint committee", as analogous to "Sino-American relations" or the "Russo-Japanese War"). In a pre-1814 context it refers to the now defunct personal union of Denmark-Norway. //Big Adamsky 03:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Hyperdontia

message: I added an "unreferenced" template, because the statement "Hyperdontia was a common genetic trait among certain Native American tribes (...) with every individual (...) having a full double set of teeth" seems a bit dubious to me, I think I need to see a source for that.
-- speaking of references, referencing Yahoo Answers is shameful 124.170.240.30 (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lose baby teeth, get starter teeth, lose starter teeth, get permanent teeth. Not a problem. Is this hyperdontia or something else and if so what?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.87.130.113 (talk) 10:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ^I had the exact same thing as you describe there, and so did my grandfather, and great grandfather apparently. I see a few people mentioning it in regards to their personal history online, but not much in the way of facts beyond this which I assume it falls within.219.88.68.195 (talk) 01:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: I find many disease listings on Wikipedia love to attribute a lesser percentage of occurance to 'Europeans' whilst assigning a higher percentage to blacks or asians. Cut the crap please.
* How is that racist? Ever heard of genetics? Studies that show the prevalence varies betwen populations. J (talk) 21:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Racist Implications

message: *Does this refer to a syndrome known as "Shark teeth". How does one develop a double set of teeth? Responses will be appreciated.
:I have never heard of "shark teeth" before, but it is not uncommon to see children with two rows of teeth (front row being baby teeth and back row being adult teeth) when the adult teeth are just beginning to come into the mouth. When this happens, this does not usually last very long because most baby teeth are going to fall out on their own, and if not a dentist will just pluck them out. - Dozenist talk 18:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shark teeth

message: The first source (link) does not work. The second 2 sources are to insubstantial web sites to validate the material they are supposed to be supporting. Bus stop (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 sources not valid; 1 source not working 

message: Wow. This article doesn't say what typical numbers of human teeth are. Nor does the article on hypodontia. — President Lethe (talk) 06:48, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual numbers? 

message: This link to a case report was added to the mainpage recently with no clear reason. I'm putting it here incase it's of any use to anyone.
http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2011;volume=29;issue=2;spage=149;epage=154;aulast=Nuvvula
GadBeebe (talk) 22:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link