lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tracy Morgan

message: I just noticed that someone added a template to question the neutrality of the "Controversy" section of this article, but that person did not post on the Talk Page to discuss making this move.
I'm honestly confused as to why that was added and the specific reasoning, and I say that as someone who has no investment in Tracy Morgan's career. I would just like to see an explanation for what is wrong with that section so it could potentially be improved. I'll also tag the user who placed the template there.
@FMSky - Usually, before you place a template like that, you post on the article's Talk Page to gain a consensus from other editors, or at least to explain why you did, or mention something in an edit note. You did not post on the Talk Page or leave an edit note explaining why you did that. Your edit note only addressed removing some information that had Fox News as a source (which I agree with). I should make it clear - I don't necessarily have a problem with the Csection template being there! But I was just confused because it didn't seem any different or more inappropriate from other articles that have "Controversy" sections. Elaboration would be appreciated :)
Actually, I'm updating this to state that I just read WP:CRITICISM and I totally see your point now. I apologize!
I don't really see how that information can remain in the article, though, given that it doesn't seem that most of it would flow with any other sections of the article. It almost seems as if the information would ideally be removed entirely (maybe with the exception of the 2022 lawsuit, since that would flow decently with the part of the article discussing his career as a whole). The other info seems like it would only be suited for a "Controversies" section. What are your thoughts? Afddiary (talk) 19:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, i didnt know you had to start a talk page discussion before placing a template, thats honestly news to be. But yes, i placed it because its discouraged per WP:CRITICISM as you noted (or more specifically WP:CSECTION). Normally i would just incorporate the section into others but in this case it is indeed not so easy --FMSky (talk) 06:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Csection added to question the neutrality of the "Controversy" section?
Talk:Val-d'Or Foreurs

message: Now expand it! :) Judgesurreal777 06:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: *Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit 02:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Valdorforeurs.gif

message: The team logo posted here is incorrect, the tree in the background should be dark green and the spelling on the logo should show Val-d'Or (with a dash), this logo here does not have the dash.  The posted 1993 - 2007 logo is also incorrect showing the wrong colour for the tree.
http://www.foreurs.qc.ca/main/index  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.2.246.32 (talk) 12:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Logo
Talk:Come Together

message: I feel like we need to do something about this. What do you think? – zmbro (talk) 00:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, , this page is really a piece of crap at the moment. I'm glad you mentioned it, since incidentally this song holds sentimental value for me; I think it was the first Beatles I was ever exposed to, being maybe twelve at a school assembly when some guys from the school band played it. They explained beforehand their difficulties in achieving the same drum sound until they did some research and realized (1) that Ringo plays left-handed on a right-handed kit and (2) he put tea towels over his toms. The thing that stuck out for me though was the bass – I'm sure the guy playing it did an awful job, but it blew me away regardless. Maybe I'll put "I'll Cry Instead" and "In My Life" on the back burner and work on this one instead. Picking which song to work on next is always the hardest part, so I'm glad you did that for me here. Tkbrett (✉) 12:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Although "In My Life" is actually my favorite Beatles song, I would say we need to do this first, as this is (very debatably), more well known than "IML" and especially "ICI". If you need assistance from me I'll try my best to help out. I'm sure I can divvy up some web sources somewhere (bookwise I'm limited to MacDonald and Lewisohn). – zmbro (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think "Hey Jude" is the only Beatles song article with more daily views. Anyway, sounds good to me. Do you have anything on any of the artists that covered it? Besides solo-John, I have nothing outside my local library. Tkbrett (✉) 12:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately nope. I'm sure some web sources could help out, I also have the Open Library I could check out later tonight. I'll ping  and see if he can help out. – zmbro (talk) 12:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The page needs a chart section, since it was number one on Billboard and number four in the UK (not to mention charting again in 1989 and 2010). I'll hold off for the moment while you're working to avoid any editing conflicts. Tkbrett (✉) 13:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Was just thinking the same thing. No go right ahead, I'll see if I can find some sources for a few of the covers. – zmbro (talk) 13:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I added what I could find. Formatting is somewhat goofy because the infoboxes are pushing everything down, but I presume it'll be better once the page gets longer. Tkbrett (✉) 14:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sweet. Added Acclaimed Music, and will continue adding best-of lists, as that's one thing I know I can do xD – zmbro (talk) 15:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible improvements 

message: Does anyone can make a topic about the animation for the song, the page doesn't even mention about it 2804:14D:A041:81AD:E081:9671:FF3:BE8D (talk) 19:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:Double Fine Comics

message: Someone please come help this poor article! Doublefine deserves better.--Syxed 06:26, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is a horrible mess, so I've decided to clean it up some. I noticed that the page was previously nominated for deletion, but the five or so editors who cared didn't reach much of a consensus. As a result, I'm not sure if this page should be merged into Double Fine Productions, or kept here. I've decided for now to keep everything on this page, but any opinions or help would be greatly appreciated. --Asclepius Quid fit? 01:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially those of people who, unlike me, regularly read the DFAC. --Asclepius Quid fit? 01:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the very least, this page needs renaming. Only the comic by Scott C is actually called Action Comics, by the look of things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aryst0krat (talk • contribs) 19:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous deletion discussion 
Talk:Sphere Break

message: Hi Renmiri, I appreciate your contribution to this article, but by moving this article to Wikibooks, you've effectively destroyed the wikilinks to and from this article. If we were to follow your reasoning for moving this article, wouldn't we have to migrate other articles such as Tetra Master, Triple Triad, and Blitzball, which have equal if not greater detail? If you must move the article to wikibooks, at least keep a stub here. Flooch 06:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like your enthusiasm and I love Sphere Break but Wikipedia is not the place for details on it. See my comments on your talk page for details Renmiri 03:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe we've come to an impasse. Let's continue this at the WikiProject/To do talk page. Flooch 06:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the move of this article to wikibooks
Talk:Raincoat (film)

message: * Outlook --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Gent–Wevelgem

message: gent should be changed to ghent in the title-want me to move it to the correct page?
Teh tennisman 01:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling 

message: Gent is the correct Flemish spelling. As this is a Flemish race, held entirely in West and East Flanders, the spelling should be "Gent-Wevelgem"
(...and don't get me started on "Mur de Grammont" for the Muur of Geraardsbergen) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.7.33.192 (talk) 04:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct spelling 

message: The "History" section is very poorly written with innumerable grammatical errors.  Additionally, there are no citations for any of the content. Where is this information coming from?  The "Route History" section is better but is essentially the same as the "History" section in terms of content. This section also contains no citations.
:To be honest, I think this whole article is a disaster, both grammatically and in terms of content. The entire article is basically a translation from the official website of Gent-Wevelgem (in Dutch), although I'm guessing it was run through a web translator. Nonetheless, the website is refreshingly elaborate and has accurate information. I will work on it. Dr.robin (talk) 02:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor grammar and no citations 

message: I worked hard on the article, fully re-wrote and sourced the History section and created a Route section. However, the section on route history remains bothersome. I renamed it Course changes and deleted some content that was aforementioned, but it is written in very poor grammar and completely unsourced. What's more, I doubt the purpose of such a detailed description of course changes. Classic races like Gent–Wevelgem change practically every year, there is no beginning to mentioning every one of them. Therefore I propose it is deleted altogether. Unless someone is willing to write a coherent and sourced part? Dr.robin (talk) 01:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Course changes
Talk:Grand Port District

message: Is there anything historically interesting to this place? --Masssiveego 06:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:The Crusade (album)

message: I love Trivium, and I know that the "The Crusade" Album is behind the old thrahs metal or post trash, but it isn't real thrash metal, It's only Swedcore with Thrash Metal! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.90.238.137 (talk) 04:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely has elements thrash metal, and so it having that as a tag seems fine to me. But it needs to have something else, illustrating that it isn't just thrash by any means. I'm fine with "Heavy metal". It's actually got quite a lot in common with power metal too, more so than thrash IMO. Prophaniti (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ¿Thrash Metal? 

message: Where in that review did we get anything about "alternative metal"? I don't see it. References to Metallica doesn't do it. If you think this album is alternative metal, you really have a poor understanding of NWOAHM. -MetalKommandant (talk) 06:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Metal 

message: About 2-3 lines screamed, no breakdowns... How is this even remotly a metalcore album? Can you cite refrences? 141.132.103.161 (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  metalcore 

message: I do agree that this album is mostly Thrash Metal... But the songs; The Rising, Anthem (We are the Fire) and Sadness will Sear aren't thrash metal... ie, slower place, less agressive vocal style etc... Adding Heavy Metal as a secondary genre would be good to cover these songs Dims25 (talk) 23:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy Metal 
Talk:Greg Paulus

message: I just reverted information added regarding Paulus's cousin and her boyfriend.  I have not attempted to verify the information, but it did not seem prima facia notable and relevant to the subject.  Thoughts?  --Hansnesse 06:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I should note that I am also working on verifying the information added about his family and school.  Any references regarding that would be helpful.  Thanks, --Hansnesse 07:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

text: this site seems to indicate he went to Christian Brothers Academy for high school (which is the original information in the article).  I am reverting the changes until more information can be brought to bear.  --Hansnesse 07:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cousin information

message: Why no mention of his academic record?131.96.205.184 (talk) 23:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Did he graduate from Duke?

message: This article isn't a C or a B.  There's a lot of information missing.  For instance, how did he manage to acquire a fifth year of collegiate eligibility? --Muboshgu (talk) 14:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a quick search but couldn't find a source that spells it out..I believe it's best explained that an NCAA athlete has five years of eligibility, but only four participating in one sport. He didn't redshirt at Duke.  Obviously he can't play bball anymore. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Downgrade

message: After playing Div I basketball for four years, how is he now eligible to play football at Syracuse?  john k (talk) 18:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Look above. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility
Talk:Schinopsis

message: How common are these trees? --Masssiveego 07:01, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chris Strachwitz

message: What are some of the stars he founded with his blues record company? --Masssiveego 07:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stars
Talk:Classics from the Comics

message: Can we get some cover art? --Masssiveego 07:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

message: By Anthology do you mean the "60 Years" annuals, which are in fact older than Classics itself, having started in 1988 as the (untitled) Golden Years series (the name Golden Years is derived from the name of the first book, "Fifty Golden Years")? Digifiend 09:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I initially thought that too, but the editor who added that bit revealed it is indeed a seperate publication on my talk page. See here. BillyH 09:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthology = 60 Years? 

message: Can we find out who the anonymous editor is? I suspect it might be ex-Dandy editor Morris Heggie, as he's the current Thomson archivist. However, I don't know for sure. Digifiend (talk) 09:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  editor 

message: Do we have an article for the Golden Years/60 Years/70 Years books? If not, I think we should create one, listing all the titles (similar to the cover descriptions on the other annuals pages). Digifiend (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  70 Years books
Talk:Juan Carlos Lorenzo

message: The anegdote of the Champions lueage finnal is quite funny. The tournament was decided by one single match, and Atletico was wining 1-0 when, in the very last minute, when german defender Schwarzenbeck rejected the ball surprising the Spanih goalkeeper Miguel Reina, who was not in his possition, for he was giving his gloves to someone as a present.
Therefore, a second final was to be played, which Atletico lost 4-0.
That's why I said the Atletico lost inthe final second. Actually, he lost the victory in the final second of the first match, and lost the cup in the second match. (See this) Mariano(t/c) 07:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (Araca la ortografia man!) It would be interesting to know whether JCL also coached Atletico when they defeated Independiente for the 1974 Intercontinental. Also, Boca's Intercontinental v. Borussia was in 1977 and not in 1978. Before returning to Boca for a (very dim) last stint, Lorenzo was semi-retired. Ah, and on that last season, yours truly was one of some 50 Estudiantes fans present in La Bombonera the day Boca lost to Estudiantes... elpincha 14:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bayern Munich finnal
Talk:Bridgehampton, New York

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873

message: I am looking for some information on how this Act affected the united States for America.  The Act appears to have converted the united States courts into an Exchequer Chamber.  This seems to be evident in that lawyers and attorneys are Esquires not Personal Representatives of the people.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.33.162.121 (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The US and the Exchequer Chamber? 

message: This article, as it presently stands, is merely about one aspect of the Judicature Act of 1873, viz., the projected abolition of the appellate jurisdiction of the House of Lords for England and Wales.  It should either be renamed accordingly, or be expanded to comprise—beyond a mere mention—the act's full effects, such as abolition of the Court of King's Bench, and the establishment of the High Court and Court of Appeal.  J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 22:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects other than on House of Lords?
Talk:Nagai Station (Osaka)

message: Are these regular stations, or the bullet train trains? --Masssiveego 07:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  services? 

message: I think this should be moved to Nagai Station (Osaka) in accordance with the project guidelines about stations with the same name (Nagai Station (Yamagata)).  I added a DAB link at the top, but didn't create a redirect at the new name because it could complicate the move later, if that is what we decide on.  Any opinions? Neier 04:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:The Feeling Good Handbook

message: Whoever suggested this, I disagree with. I feel it is relevant to have books have individual articles, and authors there own. Tyciol 07:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: If anyone knows of any online book clubs, or sites associated with the book, could you post them? I'd like to get to know other people who read this book, and it would also benefit the External links section of this article. Tyciol 07:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chat groups?

message: This is a companion piece to Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy which is a best seller and highly respected work. Wiki-psyc (talk) 00:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Heruy Wolde Selassie

message: What does “Japanizer” mean?
When the article says “He believed that Ethiopia was like a reflection of themselves, albeit a more prosperous one, so the two needed to learn from each other,” does that mean that he believed that Ethiopa was like a reflection of itself, or that Ethiopia is like a reflection of Japan? And wouldn’t Japan be the more prosperous reflection? Felicity4711 07:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to clean it up. Japan for a time was a model for non-Western peoples who wanted to Westernize. The link explains "Japanizer" a bit better.--T. Anthony 16:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dyckman Street station (IND Eighth Avenue Line)

message: My guess is that this is a railway station in some city in the USA but I cant tell that from the article! Billlion 07:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a cleanup tag. This article needs at least to say that it is about some kind of railway station? Is there an article for every one of these equally bad? Does anyone care? Billlion 15:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fixed. No, not every New York City Subway article is as bad. Marc Shepherd 20:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this?
Talk:Heavy D

message: Did he (or his relative)make a cameo appearance in the movie, “little fockers”?  as patient laying in the hospital bed while Ben stiller & kevin hart (nurses) attended to him with Angelina Jolie watching? 2600:4040:4662:EC00:FCAA:7FA:CE64:B053 (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he make a cameo appearance in “little fockers”?  as patient laying in the hospital bed while Ben stiller & kevin hart (nurses) attended to him with Angelina Jolie watching?
Talk:Shoo (singer)/Archive 1

message: Since she is more popularly known as Shoo, shouldn't the article title reflect that?  No one calls her by her given name, and articles like Cher seem to follow the rules (at least, what I think the rules are).  (And yes, this is cut-and-pasted from Bada's talk page, but all of S.E.S.'s solo pages have this problem.)  SKS2K6 08:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Raijū

message: I understand that those of us with no first-hand exposure to Japan outside anime and mangas will think that listing monsters that vaguely resemble Raijū is somehow important. It isn't. First, nothing in Pop Cult is referenced, which means it shouldn't be there to begin with. Secondly, it embarrassing to the rest of us since it gives undue weight to things that are the definition of trivia. Once you break open an actual book and do some research that would stand up to academic inquiry, in other words take Japanese mythology seriously, then whatever you come up with should and will go into this article. Anything else needs to be drop kicked and deleted. Duende-Poetry (talk) 19:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuking the Pop Cult Section From Orbit (it's the only way to be sure)
Talk:Shikome

message: Duplicate of Yomotsu-shikome (or vice versa) Pfhreak (talk) 03:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wow, where do we even begin on this? Sino-Greco comparisons without a single reference ... because, why not? why bother to actually open a book when it should just be obvious? (because that's how academia works, I suppose). I mean, once you slash and burn the Orpheus without-reference sentences what else is there to this entry but rude bullsh*t that anyone who actually cared about Japanese Mythology would take offense to? What should be done? Duende-Poetry (talk) 19:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Technically Without A Single Citation, But...

message: The tone of the artcile makes it sound like these things are real creatures, and has a tone more reminiscant of a 'How to Avoid Them" guide than an encyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.223.169 (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not real
Talk:Dielectric Shader

message: This is more then a mental ray shader! And I think that term should be removed since it is too commercial.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LaughingMan (talk • contribs) 19:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mental Ray

message: Cleaned up the text, and removed the code snippets. Uthren 19:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article still has loads of typos and as a whole is not very easy to understand. I also agree with Tangotango, the code seems very unnecessary. Can't work on the page right now, though. Visit the style guidelines for more info.
:No, it isn't easy to understand. I thought this is a physics article until I saw the categories. Samulili 21:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still needs cleanup

message: The code is pretty understandable for those who have a basic knowledge of mental ray. If you have no experiance with the renderer I suggest you do not fidle with the code. These codes are necessary to understand what variables should be changed in the Dielectric Shader to gain the wanted effect.
Thank you. (The One We Call God 01:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe you know something, and as yoy said, if someone is interested, he'll look at the documentations. The Unknown 04:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code