lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gate (Mega Man)

message: This article is only too long because it has been allowed to grow out of control. It's nothing other than plot summary of Mega Man X6, and if it's too long, then it needs to be written in summary (instead of abridgement) style. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh please. This is plot summary. Don't blame me if Keiji gives characters good background. Perhaps in Shin Mega Man DS he'll learn. Until then....-Randall Brackett 00:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it looks like a book report on MMX6. Is there anything you can say about Gate that isn't somehow summarizing, describing, or analyzing MMX6? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything is comparable to book reports on wikipedia, in my opinion. I also don't understand your question. Please elaborate. -Randall Brackett 00:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: And I disagree. I think an article specifying on character involvement is suitible. I noted this on my talkpage. Arrive at a concensus and then this will be a suitible argument. -Randall Brackett 00:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a good thing there's already the WP:FICT guideline backing me up, then, as well, in addition to WP:CRUFT. In particular, read the reasoning why every single Atlas Shrugged character no longer has their own article, including such characters as John Galt. There's a LOT more you can say about Galt than Gate (and don't bother comparing X6 to Atlas Shrugged), but the fact remains that there's nothing that you can say about Gate that isn't actually saying something about X6. He's a fictional character, and he has no life and no existence beyond his role as a part of that fictional work. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, the prose convinces me differently. As this is a content dispute and I refute your claims of policy infringement I have notified editors of these pages for a clear concensus on the issue. I'll kindly ask you refrain from reverts until discussione ends from third parties. -Randall Brackett 00:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Chaim Kreiswirth

message: Geniality?  What is this, Artscroll?
I just corrected an sentence in the 'Final Days' section. It previously read:
Continental European Jewry were especially rocked by the death of the single most important scholar and leader who ever lived
I've altered it to:
Continental European Jewry were especially rocked by the death of one of the most important scholars and leaders of post-War European Jewry.
I'm not sure if the original version was a mistake or a joke; either way it's wrong.   Ezra
:I'm not sure your version is much better.  This whole article reads like a Jewish Press obit. Joe407 (talk) 16:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Artscroll?

message: I'm removing the notability tag as per WP:PROF #6.  He was the dean of HTC.Joe407 (talk) 16:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The article seems to be telling us that "Kreiswirth" was his mother's maiden name, not his father's surname, which was, apparently, "Schermann". Given that this is a rather unusual circumstance -- adopting one's mother's name -- it would be really nice for the article to explain how and why this came to pass.
Or was "Schermann" his father's middle name, not surname (which was in fact "Kreiswirth")? Seems possible but also unlikely. In all events, this is confusing, and it seems to beg for clearer treatment in the article. Toddcs (talk) 23:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname
Talk:Vance Randolph

message: "He never moved away from the Ozarks and remained in the Ozark Mountains from 1920 until his death"
However, Dore Schary (in "Heyday") tells of writing a film script with Randolph at MGM in about 1933. They spent many weeks on it and Randolph lived in a Hollywood hotel at the time. 2A02:AA1:1642:9D3B:A523:93A4:32ED:8822 (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remained in Ozarks from 1920?
Talk:Chief Administrative Officer

message: I notice that the City Manager link on this page is being redirected to a Council-manager government and this is not the same thing as a City Manager / Chief Administrative Officer Occupation.
I would like to get this corrected so the Occupation Category is corect and consistent the different jobs can be catalogued. Government Jobs as Occupations should be clearly definable based on published job descriptions on every government website.
:A good idea would be to find the site for the City Manager and replace the current link with that yourself :D. Be bold! GofG |||  Contribs 20:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: REQUEST FOR EDITING ASSISTANCE

message: Will, You have a problem with something here put a note next to what you don't understand or are refusing to accept as fact so we can discus it like reasonable men.WikiWoo 00:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: older notes below

message: Apparently, "chief administrative officer" is also a position in some private companies.  See:
 
The article should reflect this. JChap (talk • contribs) 00:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *If you read it, you see it has some, such as for American Eagle Outfitters.  Anyway, I'm not saying they are common, I just don't think you should change the article to say they are nonexistent, especially if contrary examples can be found.  JChap (talk • contribs) 13:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *We should be trying to make it accurate.  Please start by finding citations for the changes you made to this article. JChap (talk • contribs) 13:48, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *That's not how it works.  If you add content, you need to cite your sources by footnotes or in parentheses in the text.  Please see WP:CITE, WP:NOR, WP:RS, and WP:V.  When you said that CAOs did not exist in the private sector, I was able to do a Google search and determine that was false.  If you want to say that they mostly exist in the public sector and are less common in the private sector, fine, but you need to cite a source for that.  You might try getting a book on the CAO position and doing research in that if you want to add to this article. If I can help you with anything, please let me know.  JChap (talk • contribs) 17:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: WikiWoo 02:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why you need to do research before you write the article.  Please read: WP:NOR, WP:RS, and WP:V. JChap (talk • contribs) 02:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You need to cite to your research in order to add content.  Uncited content may be deleted if an editor thinks it is inaccurate.  Also, please do not add words to my messages above my signature.  I address the comments you made in a different message on this page.  JChap (talk • contribs) 11:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of chief administrative officers in private business
Talk:Armor

message: <Strike>
As some of you may of noticed the page has been moved from Armour to Armor without any discussion and to rub more salt into the wound they didn't use the correct method as the original page's talk page was not moved with it. For this reason i have requested the page be moved back because of this act of mindless vandalism and stupidity as. The original talk page can be view here TheEnlightened 00:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paged moved to ''Armor'' without prior discussion or warning 

message: <Strike>
Armor → Armour – {The page was moved by an unregistered user without discusson on talk page or any prior warning or any acknowledgement after the move. The user also appears not to of used the move feature as the talk page was not moved with the page, however it can still be read on the Armour page which is now a redirect (that they was also done manually) so if you could reinstate the talk page as well this would be greatly appreciated TheEnlightened 00:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: <Strike>:Add any additional comments
</Strike>
Easier to just move it back myself TheEnlightened 00:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:James A. Reed (politician)

message: "In 1929, as Reed was leading the Senate, H.L. Mencken wrote a tribute to him..." How could he lead the Senate? Shouldn't this mean "as Reed was leaving the Senate"? --Scooter  (this one)  14:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading? 

message: http://localhistory.kclibrary.org/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/Zeldin&CISOPTR=90&CISOBOX=1&REC=5
read the "Notes" section below the picture, if the curator(s) of this article may be so interested.173.21.106.137 (talk) 08:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this notable? 

message: The link to Mencken's editorial at pages.prodigy.net is dead. See: External Links. "Mencken's Tribute to Reed." The editor responsible for checking dead links should perhaps look into this matter and verify if the site has been taken down. If so, that will probably affect all the other citations leading to pages.prodigy.net. --Menckenire (talk) 16:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 
Talk:Australian rappel

message: With zero citations, this article is entirely original research.  In other words, all statements in this article are things people know to be true in their heads, but the statements are not tied to published sources - generally newspaper articles and books.  Wikipedia articles need to be tied to Reliable Sources. WP:RS
It would be a big help if folks working on this article would go through and tie statements to sources. Ratagonia (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research
Talk:Sidney Rigdon

message: I have taken out the following from the section about the Rigdon/Spaulding theory:
:Most historians currently reject the theory, stating there is a lack of significant textual similarity between the Book of Mormon and the one extant Spalding manuscript (now on file at Oberlin College). Little additional circumstantial evidence exists to support the theory.  Rigdon never met Joseph Smith or read the Book of Mormon until after Parley Pratt preached to him from the already published work.
This is strikingly claims that must be accompanied by references if they should be allowed into the article. __meco (talk) 07:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced text removed from article

message: I get that Joseph Smith's original name for his group was the "Church of Christ." But it can be confusing, because there are - and were at that time - other groups also using the name "Church of Christ."  That's why the name was changed in 1834 to include the phrase "Latter Day Saints" - to avoid needless confusion. We don't do our readers any favors when we insist on using the name "Church of Christ" without any parenthetical phrase - especially since Rigdon was affiliated for a time with a Restoration Movement group. EastTN (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for Disambiguation
Talk:Nissan Murano

message: Look over there:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=77842 --Bull-Doser 00:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Maxima Of SUVs

message: Or one generation with a facelift? 842U (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two generations?
Talk:Naval Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility

message: There didn't seem to be that many ships left in Philly, when I flew past last time (June '06).  Is it being closed out?  Is this list out of date?--J Clear 00:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I live here in Philly. I went past it last month, and believe me that there are many ships there.69.136.200.66 00:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the dubious tag.  There are still plenty of ships awaiting their fate in Philly, check it out on Google Earth at 39deg53'22.75"N 75deg10'59.89"W.  I think all or almost all of those ships must be unused since the Philidelphia Naval Base proper was closed some years ago. Chrisfow 16:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philly 

message: It's great that we seem to have an up-to-date list of these ships. It isn't sourced, however. Please let us know where you got this information, how we can verify it, etc. (If it's in the lists at the end of the article, let us know.) In my experience this information is hard to track down, so if you've got a handle on it, please let the rest of us know about it. Lou Sander 22:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources, please 

message: This article mentions the various ships and what their fates are supposedly going to be.  There has to be references that back that up. We need sources that say that the ships are located at the facilities and also more references that back up what each ship's fate will be.  If there are no references that back up what the ship's fate is, then we cannot claim what those fates.  Brothejr (talk) 17:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's from the Navy's site, I had to go run some errands, so I'm not finished adding/citing everything yet. Cites and such will be forthcoming shortly. -Falcon8765 (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources, please Part 2 

message: These still are still active:
*Bayonne NJ active ?   
*Portsmouth, VA  active ? 
*San Diego, CA  active ?- 
Telecine Guy (talk) 04:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Three?
Talk:List of film serials

message: Since it would make this page to large to cut and paste the entire credited cast for each serial, I have decided to write the actor/esses name only if they were independently famous (like George Reeves of Clayton Moore) or if they were in a number of serials (Ralph Byrd, Linda Stirling). Just a note for future editing.--Dudeman5685 00:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Rules...er, guidelines 

message: As any user can see, the list at the moment is a mix of two styles - bullet points and wikitables.  I have changed the 1910s and 1930s from bullet points to a table format but this still leaves the 1920s amd 1940s.  I am working on these but the cutting, pasting and editing necessary for that is, I hope you'll understand, a bit time consuming.  I don't really have a huge amount of time to be consumed.  However, I hope everyone will bear with me and tolerate the mix for the moment.
AdamBMorgan 18:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacing bullet points with tables

message: I have just noticed that here and in the "by studio" companion list-article The Green Hornet Strikes Again! is listed as a 1940 release. Everywhere else it's put in 1941, including the succession boxes. Is this a mistake based on the 1940 year in the on-screen copyright notices, and therefore it should it be moved to 1941 in both of these lists, or does somebody here know something the rest of us don't? I'm not just going to assume the former. --Ted Watson (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Green Hornet Strikes Again!'' year--What? 

message: Corrected genre entry to reflect that it si Maritime not Western.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.116.17.37 (talk) 14:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.O.S. Coast Guard 

message: What about more recent serials such as Lolo The Penguin, and The Matrix?! In-Correct (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This list is In-Correct and also Unacceptable!
Talk:Southwestern blot

message: Hi I am interested in further developing the Southwestern blot article. So far I found several sources that could be possibly be useful to incorporate. They are listed below. 
Source 1: 
Siu, Francis K Y; Lee, Leo T O; Chow, Billy K C (2007-12-20). "Southwestern blotting in investigating transcriptional regulation". Nature Protocols. 3 (1): 51–58. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.492. ISSN 1754-2189.
Source 2:
Jia, Yinshan; Jiang, Daifeng; Jarrett, Harry W. (2010-11). "Repeated probing of Southwestern blots using alkaline phosphatase stripping". Journal of Chromatography A. 1217 (45): 7177–7181. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2010.09.033. ISSN 0021-9673. 
Source 3:
Lelong, Jean-Claude; Prevost, Grégoire; Lee, Kyong il; Crepin, Michel (1989-06). "South Western blot mapping: A procedure for simultaneous characterization of DNA binding proteins and their specific genomic DNA target sites". Analytical Biochemistry. 179 (2): 299–303. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(89)90132-2.
Source 4:
Dey, Bipasha, et al. "DNA-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis." Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 365, no. 1-2, 2012, p. 279+. Gale Academic OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A359411065/AONE?u=cuny_hunter&sid=AONE&xid=82e8dfbd. Accessed 24 Mar. 2021.
For the most part, each source gives a general overview of the technique. What stood out to me with source 2 was that it discusses potential reuse of blots and even explores ways that this could be possible. Furthermore source 4 mentions higher applications of the technique such as with 2D-SDS-PAGE. Source 1 contains a diagram of a general procedure of southwestern blotting in addition to a detailed scheme which I feel the current article lacks. 
Appreciate the time taken to consider this
EmoVis (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources to enhance article
Talk:Carl O. Sauer

message: It might be worth noting that Sauer had a significant influence on many important mid-century, American, avant-garde poets.  During the 1950's Charles Olson corresponded with and was heavily influenced by Sauer.  Sauer is mentioned by Olson in the prose works "The Gate and the Center", "Bridgework" (on a list of "men worth anyone's study") and "A Bibliography on America For Ed Dorn".  
Olson would go on - in his role as rector of Black Mountain College and afterwards - to disseminate Sauer's works to pretty much anyone who would listen.  As a result Sauer pops up in poets such as Ed Dorn, Robert Duncan and Robert Creeley.
Geographer James J Parsons has an article on the subject entitled: "'Mr Sauer'" and the Writers" (http://www.jstor.org/pss/215139)
Are there any other artists that Sauer influenced?
Maybe a broad section entitled "Influence" (or something) could include this information along with info on Sauer's influence on geography and the sciences.
Thoughts?
Kid maximus (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on the arts? 

message: The content of the section on Sauer's graduate students overlaps with Berkeley School of Latin Americanist Geography. I'd suggest trimming down the section of this article to include Sauer's students only. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graduate students 
Talk:Joseph O. Shelby

message: Shelby's brigade/division was but one player in the Camden expedition. Seems a bit much to give him most of the credit considering the events.  It would at least need citation. Red Harvest (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Camden Expedition

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I have seen such sections in other articles, but do not know if it is worth including in one like this.  I believe that in Outlaw Josey Wales, Shelby is mentioned as having headed to Mexico, and Wales seems to head that way as a way of getting away from the Federals. Boomcoach (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference in movie 
Talk:Asingan

message: A BRIEF HISTORY OF ASINGAN, PANGASINAN--172.161.134.78 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Unipath

message: Please proofread and expand as you see fit. The source is mainly the company website here--ChrisJMoor 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Henry Miller Shreve

message: I reverted the rewrite of one paragraph to this:
:On December 21, 1814, Shreve, who had been chosen to command the steamboat "Enterprise" by her owners based in Brownsville, Pa., disembarked Pittsburgh with a load of munitions for Andrew Jackson to defend New Orleans against an invasion of British forces. After the American victory at the Battle of New Orleans, a lawsuit was brought by the represenatives of Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston against Shreve and the owners of the Enterprise for violating the formers' monopoly against any unauthorized navigation of Louisiana's waters by steamboat. Soon after being released from jail, Shreve commanded the Enterprise from New Orleans to Louisville, the first time a steamboat was able to navigate that far north. Then he navigated the Enterprise to Pittsburgh and finally to her homeport of Brownsville, Pa. This voyage, more than 2,000 miles against the currents of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, by the Enterprise demonstrated for the first time the feasibility of steamboats to be used for commerce on the country's western waters.
. . . because the editor did not cite his sources. Granted, the current article does not cite sources, either, but better the devil you know until someone cites something. — BrianSmithson 22:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted changes 
Talk:Franz Sigel

message: This article states, "At the start of the war, Sigel recruited and organized an expedition to southwest Missouri and fought the Battle of Carthage, defeating 8,000 Confederates with only 800 of his own men."
The Battle of Carthage article states, "The experienced Col. Franz Sigel commanded 1,100 well trained soldiers fighting for the United States. The Missouri State Guard was commanded by Governor Claiborne F. Jackson who commanded over 4,000 unorganized, inexperienced soldiers, along with 2,000 unarmed troops who did not participate in the battle. It was a major victory for the Missouri State Guard, who fought under the Confederate flag, and played a huge part in determining Missouri's course during the war."
That's a major disagreement in the two articles. 207.69.137.202 05:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigel indeed in many opinions was the clear loser at Carthage, no the winner. The term "major victory" however should be challenged in the Carthage article, as it was a win, yes, but not major or decisive. The pro-secessionists built up the battle to epic proportions for recruiting purposes, but I would classify it as simply a victory, not a major victory. Scott Mingus 14:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reworded both articles. Scott Mingus 14:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major disagreement with the "Battle of Carthage" article

message: I came across an editorial cartoon by Thomas Nast in Harper's weekly that seems like it might be useful for this article. It would be relevant for a discussion of Sigel's postbellum role in New York politics and more importantly as a leader in the German American immigrant community. Here is the link:  128.255.85.115 (talk) 18:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Harper's Weekly Cartoon
Talk:George Sisler

message: This article states he was "one of the greatest fielding first basemen of all time." Nothing in the article backs this up. I am removing the claim until it is backed up. Kingturtle 23:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: fielding?

message: Why did you capitalize manager in the middle of a line in the infobox? SchreiberBike | ⌨  22:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's pretty standard to have all of the positions capitalized in the infobox.-- Yankees10 22:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why capitalize ''manager''?
Talk:Asclepiades of Bithynia

message: Why does empirics redirect here? Srnec 01:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It currently says ~124-91 BC, but that would make him about 35 years old when he died, which is not "an advanced age." --Quadalpha (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Altered. Most sources seem to agree he died 40BC. Can't check the original source because it's a book. PriceDL (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of birth and death
Talk:Champaign-Urbana Community Wireless Network

message: GigaOM is reporting the Champaign-Urbana Community Wireless Network project recieved a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation, in July 2006. This would be relavant information to include in this article.--riffic 01:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)