Talk:NASCAR playoffs

message: This article is very pro-Chase. It makes no mention of the argument that this type of forced competition is artificial, and unfair on drivers who dominate the first 2/3 of the season. It also gives an advantage to multiple-driver teams, who can use a car which is not in the Chase to manipulate the results in favour of its other cars. Wasn't there even a threatened boycott of the final races in 2004, by teams with no drivers in the Chase?--MartinUK (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Would there be any point to Chase for the Cup if one driver is leading the points table pre-chase, but also wins the most races, grabs most podiums and top 5 finishes?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TimHowardII (talk • contribs) 09:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chase would still happen, and that dominant driver would most likely keep on dominating. But maybe he wouldn't. That's why they have the races. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 01:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chase for the Cup despite Total Dominance?

message: I think the whole section titled "Comparisons of formats of the Chase" should be deleted. It is all speculation, under the changed rules the teams would have had different strategies, we see that now with the changes from 2013 to 2014. It's just added trivial data taking up space. Littlekelv (talk) 19:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely agree with this. It's OK to make general comparisons of the different systems but to list who would've won under old systems is just useless. The point is that they didn't win the championship in the system that mattered at the time. Intrepidusk (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

text: I agree. It is not encyclopedic-type content. I don't see the NFL pages saying "If OT wasn't sudden death then..." I am deleting.  (talk) 08:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparisons of formats of the Chase 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Chase for the Sprint Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091110011221/http://www.racewayreport.com:80/news/atlanta.html to http://www.racewayreport.com/news/atlanta.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Since the Chase was added for the each of the three national series, the article should be renamed (i.e. NASCAR Chase for the Championship or Chase for the Championship). The what-if statistics probably should removed or they will continue with the Xfinity Series and Camping World Truck Series. However, I'm pondering the idea of moving the article into NASCAR rules and regulations. Either way the article needs to be overhauled. Any other ideas on what should be done?  – Nascar1996 (talk • cont) 00:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article changes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chase for the Sprint Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070123083620/http://www.nascar.com:80/news/headlines/official/points.explained/ to http://www.nascar.com/news/headlines/official/points.explained/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I suggest that this article be changed to "NASCAR Playoffs".Pja1981 (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change