lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sandlot Ball

message: I don't believe this article needs references since I originally wrote it from firsthand knowledge. Please let me know if this is incorrect.
MSRiverHurricane 04:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I still believe the articles needs references. --Borgardetalk 07:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I don't see any significant notability for this subject, particularly with the lack of references. Can this be deleted and/or merged? Interlaker (talk) 20:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Pas kontuszowy

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 04:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the article could still be expanded. Who invented the belts? Where and how were they produced? What types existed? More pictures? When did they stopped being popular? Etc.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In truth, every article on WP could be expanded. But that fact alone doesn't qualify an article as a stub. If you see room for improvement, go for it. (Of course, this is rather an obscure topic. I'd be astonished if there was actually any additional information to be had.) The Editrix 03:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sure there is. I believe that half a planet away I have a small booklet about this, which can surely be canibalized for many information. And who knows what goodies a simple google search would do. I have already added a tidbit of information to the article. Let's play a game: whenever we decide to add or remove the tag to this article, we will add some information. Hopefully in a few passes we both will agree that it is not a stub :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed 

message: Any reference that this was worn by Belarusians? By 19th century, when Belarusian national conciousness emerged, this clothing was quickly losing its popularity, and it was worn primarily by conservative Polish-Lithuanian nobility (peasant garb was sukmana). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  16:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Belarusian clothing]]
Talk:Cube steak

message: What in the world is the "grandma burger clause"?  Joyous! | Talk 04:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it "usually top sirloin or top round" as stated in the first sentence, or is it chuck/round with "minute steak" being sirloin/round as per minute steak section? I don't know the answer, but they're not both right. Elninoict (talk) 06:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory info re: cut 

message: One part says that many English-speaking countries call this "minute steak", but a redirect says that butchers sometimes call something else that, and then the section at the bottom acts like something said there's a difference between cube steak and minute steak, but nothing said that, and, in fact, said the opposite.
I would clean it up but I have no clue what the conflicting components are trying to say. 2601:1C2:5000:1472:55EB:E7C5:7A76:F707 (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The entire "minute Steak" section contradicts itself and is written in a nonsensical way.
Talk:New York State Route 26

message: *26A: most of it is now 126, except for the Croghan-Lowville piece (812) - can probably be redirected to 126 once the history is written for that article
*26B: short spur near Redwood - best bet is to keep it contained in this article's suffixed route section
I'll do some work on this (both the section here and the history in 126) tomorrow in an attempt to get this AID wrapped up and to keep the line moving. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 08:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffixed routes
Talk:Jamawar

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 04:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed
Talk:Bonnie Hunt

message: I just hear the comment about Bonnie Hunt being single a moment ago on TV with Letterman as it is being aired, how did that get into the text already??
Bonnie Hunt Show on NBC not ABC?
I note that the article covers the recent (July2007) start of The Bonnie Hunt Show as being on ABC;  but now it is being shown on NBC - can this be clarified please.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tclose (talk • contribs) 20:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am watching it on ABC at this very moment. meinsla talk 14:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On the February 10, 2009 Bonnie Hunt Show during the Jared Padalecki interview, she mentions that she is half Polish on her mother's side. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch-9c4SV3QU  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.90.129.75 (talk) 22:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  descent 

message: Following on from the above comments, there are sources for her birth as 1961 and '64. The New York Times oddly cites both dates in the same article, which may flag that there is a genuine confusion.  The Chicago Tribune, IMDb and the Saturday Evening Post all say 1961. Actors often knock off a few years from their professed age. Perhaps it happened for her at some point. None of the cites are rock solid, but there you are. Span (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: You are right, there are many sources that read she was born in 1961, IMDB of course is much like wikipedia and can be changed at the click of a finger, the information is likely to be false as is newspapers, like youve quoted before, actors like to knock off a few years of their age, however many of her films containing DVD extras of cast contain her birth year including Jumanji of 1964, I very much doubt they would release false information on a DVD.
:It may be a genuine confusion rather than 'false information'. The broadsheet newspaper sources give various dates. Some even suggest 1954. The strongest sources presently seem to state 1961 including her agents. Short seeing official documentation such as a birth cert, I'm not sure there is much we can do except citing the strongest sources and note that it's unclear. Span (talk) 01:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonnie hunt 'Age'  
Talk:Elvis Presley on film and television

message: I have restored the television table to its last known correct and verifiably sourced version 1 before all the subsequent edits. Those were the TV appearances made by Elvis in his lifetime.  Anything that was on there since his death, retrospectives, so-called "added footaage" or "commemorative" shows, people who were on TV talking about him, bios where another actor is playing the role of Elvis, has no business being in there. Many of those were nothing but veiled infomercials, selling the latest remix of his life or career. — Maile  (talk) 19:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored television table to its last correct version 

message: Elvis name used twice in 1935 movie, "Forever England".  Saint Elvis is 1,000 year old first Elvis.
Avon Edward Foote, Ph.D., Ohio State.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:D80:5460:1B7:5C76:C492:BAC5 (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Forever England
Talk:North Caribbean Coast Autonomous Region

message: How many municipalities are there in the region?  Eight?  Or more? If there are more: what are they? --Adambrink 04:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many municipalities? 

message: How many Native american are here?--Kaiyr (talk) 11:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native american 

message: What is oficial language here?--Kaiyr (talk) 11:43, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages 

message: The spanish and german texts say that "before" the region was called "Región Autónoma del Atlántico Sur", and then was renamed "Región Autónoma de la Costa Caribe Sur". When came the new name? The map :file:Nicaragua, administrative divisions - de - colored.svg from october 2012 still uses the old name, and most other language versions of :d:Q291279 up to now use the name "Atlantic" in its title. That supports the guessing that the changed naming is really new. A date should be added. ThomasPusch (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When came the new name?
File talk:Sailor Venus 01.jpg

message: This image is lacking a source, according to the 10th Fair use guideline:
Proper attribution of the source of the material, and attribution of the copyright holder (if it is different) where possible.
Also:
For reusers, particularly commercial reusers, the most important part of a fair use description is good information on the original source of the image. That is essential to allow them to make their own determination of whether their own use is fair use. They can't rely on our judgment because they have legal liability regardless of what we say. Identifying the original source is good practice in general, as it bolsters our claim that we are not trying to defraud the original copyright holder.
In other words, reusers (commercials like Answers.com or non-commercial ones) need to know from where the image is coming to determine themselves the correct copyright information, as they can't rely on what Wikipedia members state.
If possible, inform the source in the image page by stating from where it comes:
* If picked from a website, please add the full URL to the image and/or the full URL to the page containing the image.
* If scanned, please inform in the image page that the image has been scanned, and add information about the magazine, book or cover from where the image was scanned including full title, edition, release date, page number and image author (if possible, both the artist who made the image, and the user who scanned it).
* If it is a screenshot you took from a DVD, could you inform the season, episode number and episode title?
* If a game screenshot, could you specify who took it, and if possible whether it was with an emulator or another way?
Thanks! -- ReyBrujo 04:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible image without correct source
Talk:Dirty Harry (character)

message: In The Enforcer it is strongly suggests DiGiorgio is killed in the line of duty.  However, he is stated to have survived the attack in the 1981 novel Dual of Cannons (page 34).  Are the novels canon and, if so, should the article be updated?  Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 00:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a parenthetical statement with cite.  That might cover it.--Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 00:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank DiGiorgio?
Talk:Nar

message: I removed the Neo Angelus Revolution, since it doesn't link to anything and has no explanatory text.  Guettarda 13:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neo Angelus Revolution

message: there is a band out of Sacramento, California - who are currently taking a break-
named Nar. they recorded for Very Small Records
used to listen to them back in highschool.
http://www.nokilli.com/nar/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.158.153 (talk) 07:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacramento, California Musical Group Named Nar 

message: in all seriousness, doesn't nar mean no in lower caps and warrant being added as an associated meaning? Has this been addressed? Hndrsdnpce (talk) 06:30, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Never heard of that. Do you have sources about this?--cyclopiaspeak! 07:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the word and use of nar
Talk:Judson University

message: As a student at Judson College, I have never heard anyone call Creekside South "creeky." I think this should have a source before it should be added. Students at Judson generally just call it "creekside" or "the studio." Mshuflin 04:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for reverting

message: I doubt that information about every single building on campus will be of use or interest to most readers. Perhaps these sections should be reduced or condensed.
:The building information should be removed if someone doesn't edit it soon. Delirium of disorder 18:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Every building on campus?

message: Does anyone from Judson ever go on to do anything?
SHOTS FIRED megamalx (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable alumni? 

message: As per the notice on top of this article, I support deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.135.204.13 (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 

message: Please take a look at this edit by an IP: diff which deleted the description of buidlings on campus.  Notability applies to the entire article not to individual buildings. Please consider whether this material should be reinserted in the article. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 08:42, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Campus description
File talk:Taking of Planet 5.jpg

message: That this image is more appropriate for The Taking of Planet 5 article since although it may indeed be smaller than the .png file, it's more akin to the true colour whilst the other is faded roundabout. Given that I am the creator of the other image, feel free to delete that one. DrWho42 04:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe....
Talk:List of fictional immortals

message: This talk page was originally at Category talk:Fictional immortals. I moved it here after implementing the decision to convert :Category:Fictional immortals to a list. – Fayenatic London 20:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Former category talk page

message: Ignoring the rant above... Given that the size of this category has gotten unwieldly I suggest someone go through and thins the ranks a bit by removing articles that are incorrectly here: What I mean is Fictional Vampires is a sub category but some of these articles appear both in fictional vampires and fictional immortals, the same problems happens with "fictional deities". I'm not totally familiar with the categoy rules so if some one wants to object please let me know what you think. Palendrom 23:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category size 

message: What, as opposed to all the real ones out there? Wilybadger (talk) 21:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Immortals 

message: Why are there such glaring anomalies such as the inclusion of the White Witch (from The Chronicles of Narnia), yet not have Aslan on the list??? In fact, He is properly immortal, whereas she was only immortal on Charn, when known as Jadis and having cast her curse. As written on the Stone Table, she was always susceptible to death -- by the 4 thrones being occupied by 2 sons of Adam and 2 daughters of Eve.
Would not Lovecratian monsters also make the cut? Like the Elder being Cthulhu?  
Also what on Earth is Bungle from Rainbow doing on this list?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.40.166 (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancies
Talk:Malana, Himachal Pradesh

message: Can someone explain to me why 900 Google hits for a village with these characteristics is on the low side? Half the village stubs for rural Wiltshire that I spend the occasional hour or so expanding are for villages with considerably fewer hits, and also less notability. I submit that a village on a major trekking route, with a valley named after it, and with its own language and thus a subject of scholarly work published in English and available at, for example, amazon, is notable. Removing prod.Hornplease 04:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I ve never been there yet, because of this article, now I wanna go !!
Do they still manufacturing the best black Hasch of the Universe ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.178.109.62 (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Hasch 

message: It is mentioned that haplogroup J2 is not found in Greeks, this is not true, it is the second most common haplogroup amongst Greeks.( As well described on Wikipedia ) 94.109.168.230 (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haplogroup J2
File talk:Usagi Manga.jpg

message: This image is lacking a source, according to the 10th Fair use guideline:
Proper attribution of the source of the material, and attribution of the copyright holder (if it is different) where possible.
Also:
For reusers, particularly commercial reusers, the most important part of a fair use description is good information on the original source of the image. That is essential to allow them to make their own determination of whether their own use is fair use. They can't rely on our judgment because they have legal liability regardless of what we say. Identifying the original source is good practice in general, as it bolsters our claim that we are not trying to defraud the original copyright holder.
In other words, reusers (commercials like Answers.com or non-commercial ones) need to know from where the image is coming to determine themselves the correct copyright information, as they can't rely on what Wikipedia members state.
If possible, inform the source in the image page by stating from where it comes:
* If picked from a website, please add the full URL to the image and/or the full URL to the page containing the image.
* If scanned, please inform in the image page that the image has been scanned, and add information about the magazine, book or cover from where the image was scanned including full title, edition, release date, page number and image author (if possible, both the artist who made the image, and the user who scanned it).
* If it is a screenshot you took from a DVD, could you inform the season, episode number and episode title? Also, clarify that it was you the one who took it, please.
* If a game screenshot, could you specify who took it, and if possible whether it was with an emulator or another way?
Thanks! -- ReyBrujo 04:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible image without correct source
Talk:Nyaya panchayat

message: This page looks like original research, but, if read closely, does not appear to be. I am a little disappointed that someone prodded it, a simple Google search will establish notability quite easily. Nyaya panchayats are a long-planned and controversial extension to the Indian judicial system: a bill finally formalising them is due to be introduced in Parliament any moment now. De-prodding, deleting some of the nonsense in this article. Hornplease 04:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 00:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Just Surrender

message: This article sounds like it was written by the band, and has significantly too much hyperbole.  Lines like "invited on tours that other bands work for years to get on", "embarked on a mission"', and "thousands of people were listening to them every day" are grossly in appropriate for a Wikipedia article, particularly given that they're not properly sourced. -- ChrisB 04:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Until somebody bothers to address the problems cited above, the banners stay.  It's POV nonsense, plain and simple.  Seriously, you can source "Their growing fan base was eager for more recorded material."?  Their website cannot qualify as a source for that statement according to WP:V.  Show me a published article, or get it out of the article.   -- ChrisB 01:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate tone

message: So i feel im slightly out of my element here, as much as i would say i know a thing or two about editing wikis, i don't feel i am up to standard to edit this page, we should really try and get some more well versed editors to work on this page and make it better, as to me atleast,it seems like one of the least reliable pages on Wikipedia BrightenRichardsDraper (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be edited by professionals
File talk:Bssm0.png

message: This image is lacking a source, according to the 10th Fair use guideline:
Proper attribution of the source of the material, and attribution of the copyright holder (if it is different) where possible.
Also:
For reusers, particularly commercial reusers, the most important part of a fair use description is good information on the original source of the image. That is essential to allow them to make their own determination of whether their own use is fair use. They can't rely on our judgment because they have legal liability regardless of what we say. Identifying the original source is good practice in general, as it bolsters our claim that we are not trying to defraud the original copyright holder.
In other words, reusers (commercials like Answers.com or non-commercial ones) need to know from where the image is coming to determine themselves the correct copyright information, as they can't rely on what Wikipedia members state.
If possible, inform the source in the image page by stating from where it comes:
* If picked from a website, please add the full URL to the image and/or the full URL to the page containing the image.
* If scanned, please inform in the image page that the image has been scanned, and add information about the magazine, book or cover from where the image was scanned including full title, edition, release date, page number and image author (if possible, both the artist who made the image, and the user who scanned it).
* If it is a screenshot you took from a DVD, could you inform the season, episode number and episode title? Also, clarify that it was you the one who took it, please.
* If a game screenshot, could you specify who took it, and if possible whether it was with an emulator or another way?
Thanks! -- ReyBrujo 04:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible image without correct source