Talk:Borough of Darlington

message: It is my understanding that the inclusion of an external link to a site promoting a political campaign is at odds with the Wikipedia rules.  I am referring to the Darlington Referendum campaign link.  Am I wrong, or is this inappropriate? --Kev 22:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to campaign site 

message: :Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg

message: :Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg

message: :Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:06, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Darlingtoncoatofarms.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Borough of Darlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060525140007/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_economy/RegionalGVA.pdf to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_economy/RegionalGVA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Borough of Darlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121223192433/http://www.aldc.org.uk/elections/local-elections/ to http://www.aldc.org.uk/elections/local-elections/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021130091335/http://www2.darlington.gov.uk/ to http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021130091335/http://www2.darlington.gov.uk/ to http://www.darlington.gov.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820155600/http://www.visitdarlington.com/ to http://www.visitdarlington.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Given apparently Middlesbrough isn't allowed a borough article. I think we should merge Darlington Borough page with the town article and have villages listed in a wards tab. Then that solves the argument. RailwayJG (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly I wouldn't disagree with that. There are towns with only one article less deserving than Darlington to have two e.g. York and Sheffield. Eopsid (talk) 16:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Darlington Borough and Town Article