Wikipedia talk:Neglected articles

message: (From Wikipedia:Bot requests.)
Would it be possible for a bot to generate a list of articles created by anon IPs? As mentioned on Wikipedia talk:Association of Copyright Violation Hunting Wikipedians#Some ideas by me, most of the copyvio articles get created by anon IPs or newbies. It wd be great if atleast a list of articles created by anon IPs yet seeing a good history of edits can be made available. If this is not the right place for requesting report generation, please move the request to a more appropriate place. Thanks, --Gurubrahma 04:56, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably would be good to incorporate this into Wikipedia:Neglected articles by ranking this first. -- Beland 08:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also found that Special:Deadendpages and Special:Lonelypages have several candidates ripe for deletion under WP:CV and WP:AFD, however these are not updated regularly. wd be raising the same at Wikipedia:Village pump. --Gurubrahma 13:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvios 

message: Now that anon users can't make articles shouldn't some additional scoring criteria be used next time? Eugman 01:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: A few of these articles are from, or claim to be from, the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica.  I can't verify that, I can't view the brittanica pages due to technical issues.  Is it worth creating a 1911 section, so these can be verified by someone, or can they just be removed? Hiding  talk 20:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1911 Brittanica 

message: I know this may be asking the impossible, but can the scores of non-anon created pages be tied to either the age or the number of edits by that account? That would catch nonsense articles for which the author created a one-shot account. Also, is there a way to factor out automated edits? In the course of disambig fixing or spell-checking, some nonsense articles may get a remedial second edit from an unwitting passerby... Cheers! bd2412 T 05:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asking the impossible... 

message: Has this list become Neglected? Doesn't seem like it's being updated.--Rayc 05:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neglected

message: * The top of the list is currently swamped by one stubby little article for each of the 1000s of telecommunication mast in the U.S.  Someone had been tagging them as tower stubs and suggesting merges into List of masts and I started to continue the same, but the talk page at List of masts isn't even sure that page should exist.  I'm not sure where to go from here; it feels like there's too many for us to tag 'em all one by one, esp if some admin's just going to have to delete them one by one afterwards. Thoughts? --jwandersTalk 04:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Too (many) Towers 

message: This project is based on a data load from January 2006, it is now January 2007.  Does anybody maintain this project or is it time to be put out to pasture? Jeepday 15:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't seem to be much activity (no responses to the above comment!) so I vote to shelve it. MrArt 09:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OLD DATA