lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blood-vomiting game

message: AFAIK the meijin post did not actually have successors as such.  It was only filled when there was a player that was clearly best.  (from Invincible: The Games of Shusaku).  So the phrase Intetsu Akaboshi, who at the time was expected to become the successor to the Meijin post seems false.  I did a quick search through the sourced article, but could not find the reference.  I don't have time to properly read it now though. Taemyr 07:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expected meijin? 

message: Did he resign, or did they stop because of his condition? i.e. what came first the game's end or his?
:Jowa won the game, and then Akaboshi vomited blood on the board. It's possible he might have played better if he hadn't been ill, but there's no way to know. DS (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Did the Game End

message: It seems like in Japanese and Chinese sources the three "ghost moves" are only referred to rather as "妙手" which translates simply to "brilliant move(s)" 
What source is there for this supposed legend that these moves were "given to Jōwa during the game by ghosts"?
IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 11:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Moves
Talk:Jonathan Mangum

message: His firefighter movie is what the WORLD desperately needs to see. If this movie doesn't   make a you a better person, you've  lost. I can't remember name of the movie. 2600:1011:B044:B1D9:442E:191A:212:A370 (talk) 18:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnathon  Mangum fighfighter movie.
Talk:South Arm Highway

message: :The block of text that I deleted was plagiarised from the Ozroads website. Note Wikipedia's policy: "Content that violates any copyright will be deleted" 202.93.188.19 09:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are going to continue to blatantly steal information from another source, at least make an effort with your dodgy re-writes 202.93.188.19 10:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you should sign up for a wikipedia account so u can help with the project rather than delete everything without holding discussion Wiki ian 12:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does help with the project mean plagiarise other sites? 202.93.188.19 13:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Peace unkwown user. the example I've provided on the page is how u can help with the project.Wiki ian 16:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bellerieve Bypass
Talk:Jayamala

message: This article is not encyclopedic.  It has nothing about the subject other than a current news report, copied verbaitm from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5132602.stm cde 07:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Negamax

message: I would like to discuss about the last paragraph of this page:
« What can be confusing for beginners is how the heuristic value of the current node is calculated. In this implementation, the value is always calculated from the point of view of the player running the algorithm because of the color parameter. This is the same behavior as the normal minimax algorithm. If this parameter was not present, the evaluation function would need to return a score for the current player, i.e. the min or max player. »
I had really hard time to implement this algorithm directly from the given pseudo-code. It was mainly because I misunderstood the role of the 'color' variable. Indeed, in my implementation the alternation of players is handled outside of the algorithm and one can ask the object 'game' which is the current active player.
The fact is that my evaluation function for the leafs (or nodes, when 'depth=0') was already giving a '+1' when the root player was winning and a '-1' when the opponent of the root player was winning, so I discarded the color argument... 
I was wrong... but as much as the pseudo code was. Indeed, the evaluation function should give '+1' (positive number) if the current player is winning and '-1' (negative number) if the opponent of the current player is winning. It should be a local decision and not a decision based on the player who ran the initial call of the negamax function. 
I realized, once this bug as been fixed in my implementation, the meaning of the last paragraph (which is partially wrong as one can notice that the 'color' parameter is here to invert the result of the evaluation function which was probably like my own function), but, for me, it should be rewritten in a clearer way. Thus, I propose this:
# Remove the 'color' parameter from the pseudo-code and from the text around. 
# Rewrite the last paragraph as follow:
« This pseudo-code assumes that the heuristic value of a node/leaf will be given for the current player of the node and not for the player running the initial call. Meaning that a positive result means that the current player is gaining the given amount (and the opponent score is deduced of the exact same amount).
In the case of a heuristic value computed for the player running the initial call, one should take care of carrying the players' alternation to negate this effect.
Anyway, it must be understood that the negamax algorithm is the only one taking care of propagating the alternation and only local choices have to be taken. »  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.242.180.106 (talk) 14:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remark on the last paragraph 

message: The link to the C99 example code under external links is dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:131A:3E:ECE3:A970:240E:6901 (talk) 09:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link
Talk:Conversations with Other Women

message: Why is this page full of technical details ("Helena Bonham-Carter wore her own Prada shoes"??)? There is no information about the story itself or the characters...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zendive (talk • contribs) 13:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Synopsis? 

message: Just a few bits that seemed from less than a neutral point of view to me...all from the "Soundtrack" and "Split screen" sections of the article. Those paragraphs in general could probably use a review.
"The film's soundtrack is as unusual and precise as its visual design."
"The unprecedented sex scene"
"Conversations with Other Women represents an innovative development in the long tradition of experiments in split screen."
"Conversations simple yet brilliant innovation in split screen"
Smakian (talk) 22:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for adding your thoughts. If I get a chance I'll come back and take a look or maybe somebody else will before I get here. By adding your thoughts (all too often tags come without explanation) with the tag we can work at making this article better so thanks again. MarnetteD | Talk 22:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality?
Talk:Hans Canosa

message: More sourcing has become available since the redirection in 2007.  In late 2010, anonymous IP 189.195.120.180 reverted the redirect and began expanding the original stub article somewhat. While the filmmaker is not prolific, he and his work get attention. 
:()
Search results give multiple secondary sources that might be used for expansion and citations. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article
Talk:Wall framing

message: I oppose the merger because the other article has no inline citations, while the article I created has many. --Paracit 23:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mergers aren't generally stoppped just because one article is better than the other, only if they truly represent different topics.  The merged article would contain all the references from both articles, and it's not like we would convert inline citations to a worse format. —dgiestc 00:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not implying that your article is in any way inferior; it's just that they are two different-titled articles on the same subject.  Everyone will benefit if the information is combined.  This article has better citations; the other article has illustrations, and the information provided in both is complementary.  After the merger, one of the titles will become a redirect to the other, and all the text will be in one place.  Your valuable contribution will still be there. Freederick 13:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge: Per Freedrick, the other articles should probably be merged too, this will lend the main article to summary style if need be in the future. IvoShandor 13:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Note also that, if we merge the 5 separate framing articles (and smooth over the joints with a thick layer of stucco), we could have a passable good article candidate here.  None of the articles, taken separately, qualify: see points 3 and 6, in particular. Freederick 13:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Sounds good, I review over there a lot. IvoShandor 07:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: So let's do it. I review over there a lot, and haven't contributed but for the cleanup here, so I think I could review it and see if it passes the criteria, perhaps put it up for peer review first? IvoShandor 10:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first thing that I noticed is that the other three articles lack inline cites, and need more refs, that shouldn't be too hard though. I can tag them appropriately. (I may be giving up my review status here but I think I can help, I have taken three articles to GA by myself (so far)). It is always easier to find reliable sources for information that is already written than it is writing it and finding sources. : )IvoShandor 10:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I merged those articles, I hope I did it right. Now there is some major cleanup work to be done. Check it at Framing (construction).IvoShandor 10:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Precious (Cubic U album)

message: i know that EMI Music Japan is her Japanese record label, but i believe the American release was with Virgin Records.  maybe both could be included.
75.105.14.238 (talk) 03:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Label info
Template talk:WikiProject Montana

message: Change "inactive" to "semi-active" or remove the /inactive parameter altogether. The project template is transcluded on hundreds if not thousands of articles and though maintenance of the project is low, new articles are being tagged with it.  We don't need the "dead project" tag.  Montanabw(talk) 22:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: please mock up your change in Template:WikiProject Montana/sandbox - note the current mock up shows a red error message regarding missing categories. — xaosflux Talk 17:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 12 July 2019
Talk:Twenty-Four Eyes

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Internet video

message: I think the term internet video is wrong. It should be webvideo. See the discussion on Talk:Webvideo for details. Titusn 08:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is absolutely incorrect.  The web is an application on top of the Internet (which is the network).  Internet Video is another application that also runs over the Internet. Agupte 14:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: * The statement that 99% of the video online is Flash video is no longer true. 
* I don't think YouTube uses Flash video anymore.
* As I understand it, Flash is a pariah. 
* Adobe will no longer support Flash in 2020. Adobe will finally kill Flash in 2020
* If anyone reading this is more confident of my understanding of the situation, please make changes.
Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawnvawn (talk • contribs) 01:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Out-of-date information?!
Talk:Asian green bee-eater

message: This is very nice. And a beautiful photo. --Mattisse 20:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonderful article and pic 
Talk:Religious democracy

message: There is a Mediation Cabal about this article.
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-01-11 Islamic democracy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sa.vakilian (talk • contribs) 17:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediation Cabal

message: The whole article is severly biased. Almost all constitutions in the world hold their countries as countries under good.
The article stipulates a definition of religion which is analogue with social conservativism. It does a crime against the ancient icelandic and greek democracy with assuming the (absurdly relativistic) notion that their 'religion' can be understood in terms of that of USA.
This article has nothing to do in wikipedia in the tone it is written now. It should be changed or deleted. Essay, research and articles of own options should be put elsewhere. The idea of the article and a discussion of the topics of religion and democracy might well belong here. Not like it is now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.202.173.139 (talk) 11:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  THIS ARTICLE IS BIASED 

message: If Iran and Afghanistan are democracies, on par with Greece, Denmark, Argentina or England I will eat me hat!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omulurimaru (talk • contribs) 15:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO! 

message: Hello there, in my opinion, this article should be nominated for deletion, as the term is meaningless:
*Any state where the people elect some of their representatives is a democracy. I am aware that elections may be biased, some candates may not be eligible (etc); but thats not the issue here. Even in China, Iran, ... people elect mayors, or other officeholders.
*Countries where religious officeholders ("clergy") have a large say in politics are called Theocracies. Examples are Andorra, or Vatican City.
*Some countriews are absolute monarchies: the ruler and his familiy runs the country; the acts of the ruler are not limited by a constitution; examples: Gulf States, Saudi Arabia...
In that context, a state is either a Theocracy, or a democracy (or a monarchy); the term Religious democracy does not make any sense (Iran is an Islamic Republic, I think; not sure about Pakistan).
In short, the term "religious democracy" is confusing, and should not be used. --Eptalon (talk) 21:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaningless term...
Talk:Love Letter (1995 film)

message: Especially in the later paragraphs, there are flagrant grammatical errors.  Some of the content is also a little off or exaggerated. 211.225.39.76 (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs editing 

message: It's poignant and important to include the name of the book that the male Itsuki
gave the female Itsuki when he was leaving their northern town, and he knew he would
never see her again. In Japanese translation, Proust's book is called 
In Remembrance of Things Lost. It was also on this book's library card that he
drew her likeness, which she found ten years later. 
Younggoldchip (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of Book Title in Movie
Talk:The Geisha House

message: It's more like a house of ill repute in Japan.  If all of Japan were one big geisha house, then they could invite the men inside, too, so that they could take care of their wives and children.  A geisha house is a sort of military hospitality industry complex with female slaves, but the men (chikans) are enslaved, too, because they can't get any pussy unless they do what they're told.  198.145.196.71 (talk) 13:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A geisha house is not a movie.
Talk:Shemen Afarsimon

message: In April, 1988 an excavation team from the Vendyl Jones Research Institute (VJRI) discovered a juglet of oil in the Qumran area. Professor Jones believes the oil to be none other than the oil that was used in the Holy Temple. 
After intensive testing by the Pharmaceutical Department of Hebrew University, financed by VJRI, the substance inside the small juglet was verified to indeed be the Shemen Afarshimon of Psalm 133.
According to Jones, the finding of the oil was important for two reasons. It is the first item to be found from the First Temple Period and is one of the items listed among the treasures in the Copper Scroll.
On February 15, 1989, the news of the find was broken to the public by the New York Times newspaper. During the ensuing few weeks, most major news media institutions, ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN, carried the story on national and international television. In October, 1989, National Geographic Magazine featured the find, followed by Omni Magazine in December of the same year. Countless other news sources carried the story for their publications.
</blockquote>
I removed this from the article it is a verbatim copy from http://www.vendyljones.org.il/anointingoil.htm
Chikanamakalaka 08:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovery

message: Balm of Gilead has better material on this very topic - more detailed, better sourced, and better organised, and far better placed in the proper context. Better improve there than create this low-quality "article", which has little if any justification. Or is it just the ambition of forcing original Hebrew terms into English Wiki?
"Balm of Gilead" might be too specific to cover all options (the various balm oils in Judaism), but that's what I mean with improving that article: discuss the title, definition, structure, etc. Maybe "ancient balm" or "biblical balm" would be a better option. Using Hebrew as a default solution on English Wiki and creating new articles which don't contain almost any additional info looks thoroughly wrong. Arminden (talk) 07:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the use of this article?
Talk:Nihon Igai Zenbu Chinbotsu

message: WTF does this article spend so much time talking about the poster? it's ill-rogical  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.185.165.225 (talk) 02:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a space to discuss the proposed deletion of the Nihon Igai Zenbu Chinbotsu article. My inclination is to delete it for the reasons outlined below, but I would appreciate a discussion with anyone who feels otherwise. 
A preliminary search provides little indication of notability per WP:NFILM. The only source is IMDb which presents an issue per WP:IMDB.
Vegantics (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I'm afraid I contested the Prod/removed the tag. I've added a few things. Improvements are possible, Feel free to add your name and rationale inside the template above if you have time.Yours— MY, OH, MY! 09:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Sky Arts (defunct channel)

message: I think the content of the Artsworld article ought really to be moved to this article, with the necessary edits and additions due to the name change (and Artsworld then becoming a redirect to this article). The early 90s channel could either be discussed at the start of that article or actually have it's own entry - they are in fact two distinct channels with the same name and loosely similar content. Any comments/objections? --Matthew Humphreys 08:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Artsworld
Talk:Orient: A Hero's Heritage

message: The game was canceled some time ago. See http://www.gamedev.net/reference/business/features/pmAOP/default.asp for details.
Unfortunately my English is not good enough to update the article by myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.163.69.137 (talk) 21:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I.K.U.

message: *I don't think Something Awful is an appropriate source.  Its a comedy website that I don't think qualifies as a reliable source of information suitable for an encyclopedia.  I suggest a new source is found and cited.  Wickethewok 21:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. I don't know why I used that when the actual DVD is the most direct reference. Doctor Sunshine talk 23:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Something Awful

message: "She has sex with various people such as a salaryman and a stripper, a young couple, a drug dealer and a hustler named Akira and a former museum curator–cum-hobo"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:52DA:3100:F4E8:145B:B8EB:E400 (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a "cum-hobo"?
Talk:Bolinas-Stinson Union School District

message: Thanks for starting this page! The Google-satellite-map, though, isn't correct. How to fix it? Thanks again! --Joybucket 22:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Please add information and photos if you can. I need to complete the data updates and add refs. Hjal (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Update in progress
Talk:Minyue

message: "Hundred Yue" sounds a bit odd. I think "Baiyue" would be fine. --GnuDoyng 08:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baiyue

message: The ancient Minyue had cultures similar to the Taiwanese aborigines. The ancient inhabitants of Minyue were Austronesian people. The content is backup by my Taiwan educational source. If you want to expand the article, go add more contents. I did my part by adding info about the ancient culture and the people of Minyue. Sonic99 (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minyue's Culture and People 

message: A map of Minyue kingdom (闽越王国) is needed. There is a sample map here (the second map titled: 005西汉闽越王国.jpg).--122.90.99.182 (talk) 02:09, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And, a map of Dong'ou kingdom (东瓯王国) is also needed. We need it in zh.Wikipedia :zh:东瓯国.--122.90.99.182 (talk) 02:15, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Map needed
Talk:Cape Peninsula University of Technology

message: This article is not organized.
I don't see a need for the Chineese students either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puffy202 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Acoustic wave

message: I think the distinction between acoustic waves, stronger waves and shock waves justifies this topic having it's own page.  Paulgush 09:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove redirect

message: How come there is a section on echoes in this article? As far as I know, it belongs in a separate article? --JB Adder | Talk 10:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Echo section 

message: The article describes acoustic waves as being longitudinal. However this is not true for solids and thus not true in general. Please clarify!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usman.exe (talk • contribs) 05:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acoustic wave only longitudinal? 

message: I think there may be a contradiction with the definition of the reflection coefficient R. In the Reflection section, it is defined as a ratio of acoustic intensities (energies), but I think that in the Absorption section R is used as a ratio between pressures (amplitude) in the equation \alpha=1-R^2. I think the equation should be \alpha=1-R or use a new symbol and define it as a ratio of pressures; some papers use \beta J. Allen and D. Berkley, Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 65(4), pp. 943-950, April 1979 but I am not sure if other symbols are also used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by David93zgz (talk • contribs) 07:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible contradiction related to the reflection coefficient 

message: what is a echo 41.116.37.242 (talk) 20:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical sciences
Talk:Love and Berry: Dress Up and Dance!

message: I'm confused, is this a single game or a series? I searched for this article after I found Oshare Majo: Love and Berry DS Collection randomly on amazon.co.jp. Also, this article needs an infobox and some images.--SeizureDog 09:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: On the main Japanese site for Love and Berry, there is a third character, Miesha (Characters). Should we add her on here under Characters? --DinoQueen13 (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese Arcade Version

message: Dearloveand berry how can we play the ds in japan we also want to now how to now how to play in the ds pls. teach us hoe to play it we want to now how to p;ay it i want to now  .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.68.37.40 (talk) 03:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pacey