lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mill's Methods

message: Maybe we should include some real world examples like there are in this article: http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/e14.htm CarbonUnit 17:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. The ordinary reader is likely to feel lost with no concrete examples to apply these ideas to. Richard001 (talk) 06:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, but who should do it? Llamabr (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone else, obviously.  I just downloaded the eBook and, when I have time will see what I can do, as well as provide some discussion on the logical fallacies and cognitive errors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.178.5 (talk) 05:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The examples should be scientific ones, not political ones. Using politics is too distracting. But also Mill said the four Methods do not apply to politics. The issues there are too complicated. That was a major theme in System of Logic: some fields are too complicated for induction, the (hypothetico-)deductive method must be used instead, politics is one such discipline.John P. McCaskey (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: Consider the example... if the logic controlling whether "w" is TRUE is (A AND B) OR (A AND E) then "A" is not "the cause (or effect) of the given phenomenon". The following paragraph states the correct interpretation... "A" is necessary but there's no proof that it's sufficient.
Michael McGinnis (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Should it be noted that ″Direct method of agreement″ is wrong?

message: "Therefore A is the cause of w." (! sic)
->  "Therefore A is either the cause or the effect of w."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.147.148.15 (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed this. Remember to BE BOLD. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, including you. Jason Quinn (talk) 21:46, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Therefore A is the cause of w. " (! sic) 

message: Shouldn’t there be at least four instances in that example? 129.94.8.7 (talk) 07:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough instances where the phenomenon doesn’t occur in the indirect method of differences?
Talk:Ashy flycatcher

message: There are a good selection at Flickr. I've requested one. Richard001 (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a licensed one. --Chuunen Baka (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Hi , per WP:INTEXT, we shouldn't be including something in quote marks unless the attribution of that quote is noted in the text. Hence, just saying it is "cuter" without saying who said that is not permitted. Furthermore, however, the term is largely meaningless in scientific or encyclopedic terms and depends entirely on the observer. Saying it has a larger rounded head etc. is fine, and sure, dumpy is a reasonably well-defined term so that can stay, those are meaningful ways to distinguish the species from the other mentioned, but the article doesn't need mention of the "cuter" thing at all. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Qualified the cuter description; as for the "scientific or encyclopedic terms" argument, it's literally quoted from Birds of the World, the updated online version of the seminal encyclopedia about birds. If they can use the word cuter, surely us pretending it's unencyclopedic to use any interesting words at all is just taking ourselves too seriously? AryKun (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cuter"
Talk:Grumman G-44 Widgeon

message: Removed reference to the Arnold Schwarzenegger movie "Commando".  The plane featured in the movie is a G-21 Goose, not a Widgeon, specifically N143DF, which can be seen at http://www.g73s39s44online.htmlplanet.com/custom3.html.  Note the variations in the nose and the rounder tail design.  Also, plane has radial engines, and known records of N143DF indicate it to be a Goose.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.137.15 (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Postwar operations

message: I can find no reference to a G-44 on display at the National Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola, Florida.Ken keisel (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: National Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola

message: Apparently this model is the plane used for Fantasy Island. Something should be written about it, since it's a prominent usage and most likely the most famous usage of this type. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ze plane! Ze plane!]]

message: http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/6098837-181/pilot-and-passenger-injured-after?artslide=0
http://www.lakeconews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47891:-two-men-injured-in-saturday-seaplane-crash-incident-occurred-during-landing-attempt&catid=1:latest&Itemid=197
http://kron4.com/2016/09/17/seaplane-crashes-in-lake-county/
2602:30A:C7D4:9380:129A:DDFF:FE4A:7BE (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Widgeon crash on [[Clear Lake (California)]], 17 Sept 2016
Talk:John Goldwyn

message: I would like to remove the sentence, "He is the brother-in-law of his brother Tony Goldwyn's wife Jane Musky."  At best it is redundant and at worst, silly.  Obviously, he is the brother-in-law of his sister-in-law.
Any dissenting opinions?  Bueller?  Pywacket (talk) 20:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In an interview with Howard Stern, comedian Louis CK claimed that, in a business meeting, Goldwyn screamed at and angrily condemned him and the other creators of the film Pootie Tang for wasting his money, and shut down an attempt by the president of MTV Films to defend the work.http://youtu.be/TF1ZVmq2Nko?t=1m28s
I think this YouTube reference is worth including. The distinctiveness of the claim, while not publicly verifiable, is noteworthy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greeneditor491 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pootie Tang reaction
Talk:Central Michigan University Libraries

message: I honestly gotta say this is the coolest thing ever. This library is named after one of my grandpa’s great great great great grandpa’s. This is amazing to me. 2603:6000:CA02:820C:19D0:1583:1D0D:63AF (talk) 22:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles park
Talk:Crossmedia

message: Um, "Formerly Known Ass" should be "Formerly Known As"
Hmmm... Considering experts such as Henry Jenkins, Transmedia is not Crossmedia. This articile is merely based on one too-simplified and duplicate publication.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.49.124.107 (talk) 08:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Pentagon Barracks

message: Here's an entire album of the Pentagon Barracks, if anyone's interested.
http://louisdl.louislibraries.org/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/LSU_UAP&CISOPTR=3379&REC=16
I don't know how to determine what images can be used on Wikipedia, but I found this through the Louisiana Digital Library (http://louisdl.louislibraries.org/), so maybe?  Anyway, there are great interior shots and close-ups of the exterior.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.38.107.224 (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to photo album of Pentagon Barracks from Louisiana Digital Library
Talk:Siti Hartinah

message: The caption of her picture with pageant contestants is dated 1997 with a citation; however, she died in April of 1996. How is this possible? In addition, Miss Universe 1996 was awarded to Alicia Machado in May 1996 (she is seen wearing the Miss Universe sash, which she ostensibly only would have worn after her victory) which was also after her supposed death. Can someone get to the bottom of this?Garrettcarrot12 (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture with pageant contestants
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Evidence

message: Apologies on the length of my response (I only noticed the word-limit request after I posted it).  I've also been informed by the clerks that it is a bit wordy, but it covers my views on the concerns raised, and I don't expect to expand it any further.  --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is your opinion.  I disagree; Wikitruth is not Wikipedia, but it supplies sufficient context related to Jeffrey's desire to not have a user page; so does the deletion log.  --Iamunknown 06:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only leads to the deletion log = not specific or at least for me. It is the site wide deletion log not the one restricted to his user page. Wikitruth is only a source for evidence in this case If I had been aware of it. ViridaeTalk 09:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/BlueShrek

message: :As you can see here, many of the main puppeteer's () sock accounts end with "420", I'd say based on this and the the almost exact same editing pattern, that these are all definitely one in the same. I have also added  to the list of names to check against, seeing as that was this puppeteer's first account. Bmg916Speak 22:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that I've just added  and  at the top. Lord Sesshomaru 03:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The blocking sysop Kafziel has banned the user . According to him, the user is an obvious BlueShrek sock, hence, I've placed it at the top. Lord Sesshomaru 05:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit confused as to why  was added to the list.  He was in conflict with BlueShrek on an earlier occasion, and even found himself blocked for it.  Doesn't seem like the behaviour of a sock to me.  I mean, unless he was a really devious sockpuppeteer, but User:Wrestlinglover420 doesn't quite strike me as that much of a forward thinker.  The dispute between the two took place before anyone had suggested that User:BlueShrek was a sock.  Lychosis T/C 05:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at his edits, they're "almost" a giveaway. The only pages this user has edited are Spider-Man: Friend or Foe and several talk pages. A bit suspicious if you ask me, but no harm in letting a CheckUser decide. Right? Lord Sesshomaru 06:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Though there is no direct evidence pointing the newly added user  (see above) to any of the other suspects, except for the fact that the user's name is "Blue" sky which is like "Blue"Shrek and that his signature is made like BlueShreks, see Blue sky 4's sig. and one of BlueShrek's sig. I want to know if he is related to anyone of the listed socks. And I don't know if this is appropiate to say, but Blue sky 4 only edits on random days on pages having to do with the :Akira Toriyama article. I just find that really strange, that's all, but it could be just me. No harm or foul in checking. Lord Sesshomaru 07:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And , another user that edits on random days. I want to know if Wikizeta has anything to do with anyone listed above. Lord Sesshomaru 18:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Madagascar Armed Forces

message: I feel like the number of photos on this article is a bit much. I can appreciate that they add a value, but not sure if it's enough to warrant their inclusion. Most of the armaments with images already have those images when wikilinked, so maybe a clean up should be done? Lindsey40186 (talk) 01:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of photos
Talk:Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust

message: Hi. I have changed some of the formatting of the article to be more wikipedia like. Included in this I have removed phone number and email address. This is not because I do not want people to support you, but it is a prime target for vandalism, and can be easily accessed by your website. If you have any queries about what I have done or would like any more help, please feel free to leave them on this page, or my talk page. Tiddly Tom 17:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes made by Tiddly Tom 26/7/07
Talk:List of railway stations in Merseyside

message: I've removed some closed stations from this list as they were not in Merseyside, others need to be checked e.g. Heathey Lane, Parkgate, Neston South - 86.130.162.61 17:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have reworked this list into tabular form, adding various statistics.  Have removed these stations from the "Closed" list for now:
*Bootle Village (can't find any info or trace of it yet)
*Bromborough Port (can't find any info or trace of it yet)
*Millers Bridge (can't find any info or trace of it yet)
*Rock Lane (can't find any info or trace of it yet)
*Wavertree Lane (can't find any info or trace of it yet)
*Ditton (this is in Cheshire)
*Ledsham (this is in Cheshire)
There may be some other stations to add to the "Closed" list.  Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 20:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more removals 
Talk:Leaden flycatcher

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Myiagra rubecula - Australian National Botanic Gardens edit1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 6, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-03-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Myiagra rubecula - Australian National Botanic Gardens edit1.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:H.U.R.L.

message: I'm adding more info today.  I know that it qualifies as original research, but as far as I can see, so does everything else in the article, and it has surprised me that it has stood unchallenged so far.  I would also say that pretty much any article on an obscure video game is going to consist of almost entirely OR statements.  (But it's not like there's anything to be gained by putting up false info.)  <FONT COLOR="#800000"><B>Soap</B></FONT> Talk/Contributions 08:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just noting that plot summaries are allowed as the info can be verified by playing the game ... it's a pretty deep hole in the verifiability policy, but it exists and it's not just me making things up to keep my article on the wiki.  Besides, I actually wanted to AfD it at one point but was told it was notable.  —Soap— 02:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

message: I've done a bit of a cleanup of this, added some cite tags where needed and removed the extremely biased and un-encyclopedic section on the AI. Unfortunately I'm not in the mood for citations and so forth, so that might wait until later 202.134.239.230 (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a reference for the multiple names.  The other two things are goin to be hard.  The best I can do for the AI question is link to a game review; the other one is just something I happen to know from talking to the programmers. <FONT COLOR="#800000"><B>Soap</B></FONT> Talk/Contributions 19:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The Infobox claims that a "Windows" version exists.  I couldn't find it.  Does anyone have a link?  If not, I suggest removing "Windows" from the "Platform(s)" field of the Infobox.
ProResearcher (talk) 10:41, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the game was only for DOS. I think it may have been common at the time to include Windows on the label of DOS games (and maybe other software) so that people would be less likely to see them as outdated. And there may be another reason .... I remember  some games, such as DOOM, that required the player to reboot the computer into DOS mode, meaning that all other programs had to shut down. I believe HURL did not require this .... while the game ran in DOS, it was able to run in a DOS prompt within Windows, which some other games could not do. So maybe the Windows label wasnt just a marketing ploy after all. —Soap— 16:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows version
Talk:Galapagos flycatcher

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Galapagos Hawk which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Although the name "Galapagos Flycatcher" is an alternative name for the Large-billed Flycatcher (Myiarchus magnirostris), that name is now reserved for what was until ≈2013 the Galapagos subspecies of the Vermilion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus nanus), and now elevated to full species (Pyrocephalus nanus). I propose the name of this page be changed to "Large-billed Flycatcher" with text explaining the old alternative name. I also propose to create a NEW page "Galapagos Flycatcher" for Pyrocephalus nanus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeadleB (talk • contribs) 02:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change Proposal (NOT related to diacritical marks)
Talk:Persistent cloaca

message: Could someone confirm that the text on this page wasn't lifted verbatim from the two referenced textbooks? —85.214.60.31 17:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately no, since I don't own them, to make sure this isn't the case, let's contribute lots more and break up and rearrange everything so we have a unique article. Tyciol (talk) 19:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyright violation?

message: Without the Spitz and Coran book cited as source for "Treatment" to hand, I'd hazard a guess that it's also the source for "Presentation" because the first sentence of Treatment refers back to the last sentence of Presentation via the phrase "this type of cloaca" (viz., < 3 cm). If so, I'd combine the two sections into one, "Presentation and Treatment."--Hieronymus Illinensis (talk) 18:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for Presentation

message: ... is poorly worded, and filled with technical jargon: "performing [a] posterior sagittal approach without opening of the abdomen." What is this supposed to mean? Near the anus rather than the "front" of the perineum, making sure to keep it in a straight line and not slice into either butt-cheek? How does 'approach' fit into it. And how many casual readers seeking a basic explanation of the condition would nod their heads and go "ah, ok."?
I would love to attempt to remedy the grammar but I haven't the technical knowledge to do it adequately. I can only say: if you are a medical student, please don't treat this site as a way to slip something into Gray's Anatomy. Link your comments, and express your ideas in a way that is remotely understandable to the layman. No general-purpose encyclopedia ever engages in such profession-specific jargon, for blatantly obvious reasons. Seneillion (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Treatment" section

message: Is this a condition in humans specifically? If so, I think this is worth specifying since cloacas are the correct anatomy in many non-human species. 
—- AsterRoc (talk) 01:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species affected
Talk:Rufous-tailed flycatcher

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Rufous-tailed flycatcher (Myiarchus validus).JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on August 6, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-08-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Rufous-tailed flycatcher (Myiarchus validus).JPG]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Chợ Lớn

message: How is it possible that there is still no map in this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 20:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 May 2022
Talk:Tân Bình district

message: Is it correct that this district has a high concentration of inhabitants of northern Vietnamese origin? Badagnani 21:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the official government website:
 DHN 21:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: In 1954, about a million northerners went South after the partition of the country in the Geneva Conference (1954).  Most of the refugees were Roman Catholics who feared persecution by the communists. DHN 23:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Need etymology. Badagnani (talk) 03:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Bình Tân district, Ho Chi Minh City

message: Need etymology. Badagnani (talk) 03:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Slate-throated whitestart

message: I was redirected to this page when I searched for "slate-throated redstart"... does anyone know why? I didn't think these two names were the same bird. Here was the message I got: "(Redirected from Slate-throated Redstart)" Fallendarling (talk) 00:18, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Slate-throated redstart?
Talk:Maclaren

message: I, Sarah Henderson, am the author of the article "Maclaren", in its original location at stroller.com. The original article is under a GFDL license and is free for public use. The copyright tag is visible on stroller.com today, July 26, 2007.
::That's fine, but the tone of your addition is far to raving and point of view.  Please take care to make entries more encyclopedic.  Cheers. Dina 18:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the original article at http://www.stroller.com/maclaren.html is no longer available, the stroller.com domain name is for sale. :- [ - 220 of Borg 10:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

message: In removing the promotional material from earlier edits the article now starts in the middle. What was the original buggy design?
188.222.188.169 (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text missing 
Talk:Immortal Man

message: "The Immortal Man was recently seen in they year 20XX where he currently is in a century long battle with his past self. The Battle began when Future Immortal Man was attempting to Drop from space and land on a building, destroying the building in the process. The Past Immortal Man knowing that if Future Immortal man was successful would destroy the time line countered this attack with an uppercut knocking the Future Immortal Man back into space." I have no idea in what title this story is supposed to have taken place and it also sounds extremely weird. Anybody have information about it? IchiGhost (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: There's a bit of movement on Immortal Man's page recently, so I just thought I'd point out I'm upping a complete up-to-date revision which addresses the issues box problems within the next 24 hours. Anybody with any burning changes might want to either wait or contact me here or on my discussion page so I can add. Thanks Archiveangel (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: now done Archiveangel (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming revision 
Talk:Langdon, Kent

message: There is an article on East Langdon, which (according to this article) is the same place. This article is better developed but, if it is more usually called East Langdon, perhaps the conjoined article should have "East Langdon" in the title? 45ossington (talk) 09:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand the sentiment here, but do we do the same merge for West Langdon, Martin and Martin Mill. I have altered this article to make it plain that Langdon is the civil parish.... can be checked here: https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/. Acabashi (talk) 12:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated also at Talk:East Langdon, it has been demonstrated to me that my suggestion of a merger is ill-conceived. Unless anyone disagrees, I withdraw it, with apology for any time wasted. The article now looks in much better shape after Acabashi's improvements. 45ossington (talk) 17:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger suggestion