lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spin echo

message: I am studying NMR and solid state NMR. I would find it useful to find a section regarding using the hahn echo to create an echo train (like in the CPMG experiment), however I do not have the confidence to write it myself.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.238.51 (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Echo Train?

message: I disagree with the rating of LOW importance.  Spin-echo is very often referred to in courses as the most basic MRI sequence -- that is its the first thing a student learning about NMR or MRI will want to figure out.  Its important that the introduction to this field be a well-written article, possible aimed at a technical but non-expert audience.  Salsasam (talk) 00:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: old comment

message: I used to study physics, but it is entirely obscure what the angles here mean. Are these phase angles? Or orientation angles of the coils? A physical derivation might be clearer?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.11.191.62 (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: These angles are the angle through which a pulse rotates the spins in the Bloch sphere. GavinMorley (talk) 15:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly is meant with the angles? i.e. 90 and 180 degrees? 

message: Presumably T1 and T2 in the text refer to the 1st t and 2nd t, respectively, in the x-axis of the images and videos. For clarity, these ts should be labeled as t1 and t2, respectively.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guozk2 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  T1 and T2 discussed in the text should be related to the images/videos  

message: It seems to me that the times between pulses and echo are not necessarily equal, and therefore require subscripts to distinguish them, for example, 
tau,1=t,pulse2 - t,pulse1
tau,2=t,pulse3 - t,pulse2
tau,3=t,echo - t,pulse3
(Unfortunately, I lack the required coding skills to change it and have no time to teach myself, at present)
In any case, might anyone disagree with this logic? Thedoctorissick (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tau in Stimulated Echo 

message: Why is this article called "Spin echo" when the section on Photon echo makes it clear that this rephasing echo effect is more general than just applying to spin? 162.246.139.210 (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Because photon echo is a spin echo.--ReyHahn (talk) 10:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photon echo
Talk:Rob Savoye

message: Rob is a friend of mine and we've spent considerable time together both at his home in Colorado and at the Rainbow Gatherings. I have sent him an email with some basic questions and will update this page. Bstone 07:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the page with information provided to me from Rob himself. I also added a video interview with him and cleaned up some other parts. Bstone 16:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :In September, 2010 I've personally took this photo: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rob_savoye.JPG of Rob at SFK11 after his keynote, I propose changing with the current photo. --Gentthaqi (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've personally changed the photo, if someone disagrees freely re-put the old one. --Gentthaqi (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Newer photo of Rob Savoye
Talk:Ceva (semiconductor company)

message: The page http://www.ceva-dsp.com/about/index.php says that the headquarters are in Mountain View and not in San José.
ICE77 (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters 

message: Much more information about the actual products would be appreciated. E.g. documentation of instruction set, available compilers, etc. User:ScotXWt@lk 13:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much more info about the actual products 

message: If the name is an acronym, we would need to define that before the first use. Otherwise, we should use the English language convention of first letter only in capital, not the entire word, since we do not use trademark stylization.
And to answer above (belatedly), perhaps not. Wikipedia is not a product guide. So only information about the company and its products given by outside sources, please. And they do not sell solutions. W Nowicki (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company name
Talk:James Godwin

message: "... he served as a Commanding Officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 192 (VFA-192)..." (my emphasis)
Does this mean that US Navy fighter squadrons have more than one Commanding Officer? Because at the moment that is what the quote above implies. If ever there was a one letter word that can change the meaning of a sentence, this is it.
RASAM (talk) 20:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: COs of the squadron?!
Talk:STAR model

message: In the "STAR as an Extension of the AutoRegressive Model" section, the equation does not make sense because the right-hand side has column vectors and the left-hand side is a scalar. It seems the autoregressive parameters are missing and it should something like y = X*gamma ..., but I am not an expert on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BD8A:5990:21C2:21F4:AE75:B089 (talk) 15:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Bike or Die!

message: The Bike or Die! Wikipedia page is currently in progress, and will get several updates in the next week. Current contributions:
Page Author: Easter Egg section
Mike Flips: Half of Content
Me: Half of Content, plus pictures, and organization.
I'm sure parts would be hard to understand for a newbie, so they should be explained better.
Kristopher Windsor 18:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lotta progress today, it looks a LOT better now. I'd suggest working on finding good solid sources on the parts marked with  (Also looks like this: )... --SXT40 09:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you check out where I cited things, that's what I think to be the best way to do it, that way, you can just list the citations inline with the text... --SXT40 09:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progress 

message: Possible sources. Not put in article yet, as I need to check if they are WP:RS: The Gadgeteer, MobileTechReview. Marasmusine (talk) 10:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd party sources
Talk:Frederick M. Franks Jr.

message: I feel that the angrily partisan tone of the second part of this section does a real disservice to Gen. Franks. It comes across as nit-picky and overly defensive. Why not just mention that there was some controversy, list Franks' achievements, and leave it at that? ˜˜˜˜  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomseattle (talk • contribs) 15:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree so much !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.205.209 (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Gulf War section
Talk:Strontium aluminate

message: Pure (undoped) strontium aluminate should be colorless. --FK1954 (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pale yellow color? 

message: "Strontium aluminate phosphor is fired at about 1250 °C. Subjecting it to temperatures above 1090 °C is likely to cause loss of its phosphorescent properties."
The temperature lower than firing temperature is a bit confusing. Does this refer to post-manufacture heating? If so, perhaps it can be reworded to indicate this, such as: 
"Strontium aluminate phosphor is fired at about 1250 °C. Subjecting it to temperatures above 1090 °C after manufacture is likely to cause loss of its phosphorescent properties."
PatrickSalsbury (talk) 00:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This bit is unclear... 

message: I did not find the temperature sequence confusing, it seemed post manufacture was pretty clearly implicit.  However I would greatly like to see some explanation about why phosphorescent properties are lost.  Does the material undergo a change in composition, a phase change, crystalline structure metamorphosis or what?
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.49.151 (talk) 05:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  i had a different view of that part 

message: A large portion of this article has been taken word-for-word from one of its sources, page 555 of the Encyclopedia of alkaline earth compounds.  I have contacted the original writer of that text and asked him to put in some quotation marks and/ or paraphrase the text rather than leave it here as a simple copy.  We write Wikipedia articles, we should not copy & paste them, and most of this is the latter. KDS4444Talk 18:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Turns out that the book copied the Wikipedia article, word-for-word, and without giving proper credit.  My bad, and somebody autta file a lawsuit somewhere, it seems. KDS4444Talk 16:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large section of copied text

message: I have experimentally shown that the pH of Cerium - doped Strontium aluminate is between 10 and 12.Can we add this to the list of Strontium Aluminate's properties?I think it would be useful to some chemists.
Also , I have done an experiment to show that Cerium - doped Strontium aluminate is nearly insoluble in Water at 273 K up to  373 k.I believe that this to can be added to the properties of Strontium aluminate.I do not have the photos as of now, but I will list them here as soon as possible. SriCHaM (talk) 12:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add -pH of Cerium-doped Strontium Aluminate and  its Solubility in water.
Talk:Superactinide

message: A superactinide would be a member of a series that began at Z = 121 and had a content of 18 elements. Or maybe Iupac would have 19 elements by including Z = 139 on the list. Note that each successive series involves 4 more elements than the previous series. And the extended periodic table would end at Z = 168 for Iupac and at Z = 170 for the increased Janet Periodic table. A 2nd row of elements in this area would require an additional 50 elements and extend to Z = 220 in an extended Janet periodic table. However the number of permitted "extra neutrons" above the Z number of neutrons would only probably rise to about 100 extra neutrons due to structural limitations.WFPM (talk) 16:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

message: * Fricke_superheavy_1975
* Fricke_continuation_1971
*
*
--Stone (talk) 20:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This article is nearly GA, but needs more references in a few parts and should discuss more about the expected physical and chemical properties of the superactinides. (Doesn't the EB reference have some?) Double sharp (talk) 07:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: BTW, 5 milli-_ ≠ 5,000,000 pico-_ = 5 micro-_. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure which figure is right (5 mb or 5,000,000 pb). This problem is also at the Unbibium article. Double sharp (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempts at synthesis 

message: Earlier, we had used a non-relativistic approach to the extended periodic table. Now, however, due to the fact that it is more accurate representation of the behavior of superheavy undiscovered elements, wikipedia has switched to a relativistic extended periodic table. However, this article has not been updated yet, and until it is, it is not factually accurate. StringTheory11 (t • c) 01:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected to Period 8 element#Superactinides, which covers the same material, but is much more accurate. Double sharp (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:George R. Knight

message: What do you mean by "revisionist work"?  Heiko Evermann 11:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume the author meant that Knight offered a simple "review" or summary of history. However I agree that it is ambiguous, as it could imply that Knight changed the church, and should be reworded. Colin MacLaurin 15:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "revisionist work"? 

message: The word "summer" used to date an event is Northern Hemisphere-centric (in this case). Please reword. Colin MacLaurin 15:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited worldwide focus 

message: At the moment, the box at the top right of the article lists his occupations, starting with "Seventh-day Adventist". I don't think that is an occupation. Perhaps it is supposed to say "Seventh-day Adventist Historian"?  --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 00:59, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation 
Talk:Jon Paulien

message: Regarding the leading Adventist scholar on Revelation comment, this was asserted in an early 2008 Record issue, on the back inset page. Need to dig it out. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading scholar 
Talk:Alden Thompson

message: Recent edits added the following content:
:"Some say he has departed from the Official Seventh-day Adventist guidelines for Bible interpretation (see Methods of Bible Study at http://www.adventist.org/beliefs/other_documents/other_doc4.html ). He is considered a liberal Seventh-day Adventist Theologian."
Please give citations (see Wikipedia:Verifiability) before adding content which may be considered controversial. Samuel Koranteng-Pipim may well have written something along these lines. I understand one of his books was largely a rebuttal to Thompson's?
I have effectively added the comments (reworded) to Seventh-day Adventist theology#View of Scripture, and in toned-down form to a new section Alden Thompson#Theology. Colin MacLaurin 14:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal? 
Talk:Tautological one-form

message: The canonical 1-form is always a symplectic potential, but the converse is not true, as a symplectic potential is a local object that exists on a contractible subset of a symplectic manifold such that d theta = omega. Thus they only coincide if the symplectic manifold is contractible and only up to the addition of an exact 1-form. 93.222.57.53 (talk) 12:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the above remark to the article. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 04:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "Physical interperation" section seems very misleading to me, because the claim that "the tautological one-form is a device that converts velocities into momenta" seems to imply that the tautological one-form establishes a canonical isomorphism between TQ and T^*Q that allows one to convert between vectors and one-forms on Q. But this is not true; instead, the tautological one-form establishes a canonical isomorphism between TM and T^*M, where M is the cotangent bundle T^*Q of Q, rather than Q itself. The tautological one-form by itself is not enough to convert between velocities (vectors) and momenta (one-forms) on the configuration space; for that, one needs to define either a Lagrangian function on TQ or a Hamiltonian function on T^*Q. I've deleted this entire section, because it seems fundamentally misleading. Ted.tem.parker (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting the "physical interpretation" section
Talk:Record (TV network)

message: We should start rewriting this page translating as much as possible the Rede Record page on the Portuguese-speaking Wikipedia. It's way better than this page.
--CesarCardoso 15:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An idea to rewrite this page 

message: It's no that big at all. SBT is bigger, and it's not "one of the biggest at the world".
(I'm Brazilian, that's how I know.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.207.165.148 (talk) 16:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It isn't even that big 

message: It looks like the author of this article is a great fan of the subject TV channel. I mean: when I first read, I've doubt about the facts exposed in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.13.0.191 (talk) 01:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  That`s not neutral 

message: Guys, if you wanna contribute to the article, please feel free to do so, but DO NOT make stupid mistakes, like "At the 60's years"... That's not even English! I had to re-write the whole thing. It's great to help wikipedia, but if you DON'T KNOW ENGLISH THAT WELL, PLEASE ASK FOR HELP!!! 
C-ya!
Luiz Guilherme
::Now that's a big way of talking to people. ALL CAPITALS isnt considered being nice, did you know that?
::Leo McAllister 20:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE! 

message: A user from 201.40.25.232 has changed the slogan to "Com você é melhor" ("With you, it is better") from "A caminho da liderança" ("The way of the leadership"). Per the company's site (here is one instance), their slogan does not appear to have changed. However, not being from Brasil and thus not familiar with the subject, I'm going to refrain from reverting the edit, but it ought to be verified. Fogster (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slogan
Talk:Tears of wine

message: I think that the references to 'liquid' should be changed to something else. Are we talking about water here? Solution? Solvent? The alcohol in wine is liquid at room temperature, as are most household alcohols. It doesn't make sense to call refer to the non-alcoholic part of a solution as 'liquid', since alcohol is liquid too, and part of the liquid solution. Propose 'water'. 
132.216.227.197 (talk) 05:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liquid? 

message: :"If alcohol is mixed with water inhomogeneously, a region with a lower concentration of alcohol will pull on the surrounding fluid more strongly than a region with a higher alcohol concentration."
*will pull on the surrounding fluid or
*will pull on the surrounding solid
?--Abdull (talk) 23:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pull 

message: I have significant doubts that the explanation for this effect is based on capillary action. While I realize this is not the forum for this type of discussion, I believe readers should accept the theory as expressed here with caution. My reasoning is that if it is indeed capillary action that draws the liquid up the walls, then imagine if the liquid is higher in the glass than the one pictured, say nearly to the top. It should crawl over the top and coat the outside of the glass, if it is simply capillary movement. This would allow the drink to partially leave its container, but that is not what ever happens. I believe a better explanation is that the water and alcohol vapor are condensed onto the walls. I have no clear understanding of why more water is present at the top than at the bulk liquid surface. It is possible that both the surface energy of the glass as well as the high vapor concentration both contribute to this effect, but capillary action is generally seen only in small confined tubes/spaces. (for instance the small voids between hairs, or in the voids inside a piece of paper.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.142.179.182 (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubt about explanation
Talk:Randall Edwards (politician)

message: Over the past two days, I have added material from 20 additional published sources, all press accounts, greatly expanding all sections.  There are still considerable gaps in his record as legislator and as treasurer, which I will be working to fill over the next few days.  Since these editing sessions will be long, I'll mark the article as "in use" during them to avoid potential simultaneous edit conflicts. -- J-M Jgilhousen 00:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reclassification as "Start" 

message: While there are many facts stated, and good sources, the tenor of the article is to promote its subject. Steven Alexander 06:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like promotional copy
Talk:Oregon State Treasurer

message: Work by the  Oregon Government & Politics subproject has only recently begun.  I think it is to be hoped that an office as important and powerful as the State Treasurer and the vast Treasury Department eventually and in due course would warrant complete and thorough articles.  Other priorities rank higher. -- "J-M" (Jgilhousen) 00:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon State Treasury redirects here 

message: Can someone please insert United States, or USA, or American, somewhere in the opening sentence or paragraph? Wikipedia, and indeed the internet, is a resource used outside of Oregon and articles should reflect that fact. LessHeard vanU 23:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, we know. I'll take care of it. Katr67 01:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers. LessHeard vanU 13:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nation
Talk:Nikola Tesla electric car hoax

message: Added a notability tag, this article seems nothing more than tertiary references to a dubious story of very little notability except perhaps to the occasional fringe theorist. This article is the wikipedia equivalent of; "I heard this crazy story from my friend, about this guys uncle who said maybe something weird happened, but I don't think so." This article should probably be deleted for multiple reasons including the general lack of notability, and a lack of reliable and notable sources. As the user Vinyasi noted there is nothing but a handful of anecdotes.
--DogBiscut (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Notability Tag 

message: How could "EVERY account of this purported demonstration automobile [be] based upon the 1967 story plus literary embellishment"? Who here investigated every account? jrun (talk) 23:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That was  original research, and I have removed it. Cardamon (talk) 00:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanket categorization of  claims  

message: Please delete all this is fake  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.141.77.69 (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is fake 

message: To abuse language is to abuse one another. For when we misuse a word for some other meaning or intention, we spawn confusion (through lack of discerning judgement) and a loss of vocabulary.
Take the title, “Nikola Tesla electric car hoax” presented as a rumor.
This rumor has no evidence to discredit this gossip. Lack of evidence does not constitute a hoax. To be a hoax, there must be factual evidence which turns out – upon later analysis – to be fraudulent evidence. Then, and only then, is it a hoax. Otherwise, without evidence of any sort, it is strictly a rumor. And people who spread rumors turn the initial “tall tale” into gossip.
To be precise, no one knows how the “Tesla Hoax” of Peter Savo or his journalist buddy was pulled off for there is no evidence of their hoax – much less any evidence of Tesla's. All we have are anecdotes.
Either change the title, or start initiating inquiry into how this hoax was successfully pulled off to dupe some of us into believing that it was true – that it actually happened.
Or – Oh, my God! - start investigating how this event actually occurred.
Either way, correct this error of misrepresenting this purported, historical event and our misuse of language.
Want to know what I think?  Vinyasi (talk) 23:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nikola Tesla electric car rumor ...