Talk:List of ITU-T V-series recommendations

message: Cwolfsheep 18:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! Renamed article as requested above. JubalHarshaw 14:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: does anyone know why the 56K standard was put in this section. Also are there other such reccomendations that aren't listed in this article that actually perform such simultanious transmission? Plugwash 00:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any V.60-V.99 would fall into that category. Why the ITU decided to put V.92 there instead of V.10-V.39 with the other modems I don't know, but they're the standards organization, we're just documenting what they did. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 13:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Simultaneous transmission of data and other signals" 

message: V.33 redirects here, but is not listed in the article.
195.220.102.97 15:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  V.33 

message: The article has been flagged with Template:Expert-subject for over 2 years now, and in that time has received substantial expert refinement. Thanks to the contributions of User:71.254.221.8, among many others, it appears to be in quite good shape from a technical perspective.
As I don't see anything in the article that directly requires expert attention, and there's nothing here on the talk page that directly addresses expert-attention needs, I'm going to be bold and remove the box. Anyone who disagrees with this change is invited to reverse it, and encouraged to share any specific concerns here. FeRD_NYC (talk) 19:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescinding Template:Expert-Subject flagging 

message: Building off the quote "The international standards that are produced by the ITU-T are referred to as "Recommendations" (with the word ordinarily capitalized to distinguish its meaning from the ordinary sense of the word "recommendation"), as they become mandatory only when adopted as part of a national law." from the ITU-T page. Should the use of "recommendations" be capitalized throughout this article?  216.54.1.35 (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendations 

message: Does anyone know when each standard was introduced/ratified/etc, and roughly when the first practical use was made of them (i.e. at least two modems supporting the standard had been sold to the public)?
I'm trying to figure out at the moment what typical online speeds would have been around 1991 without having to delve into randomly scanned back issues of computer magazines (my own memory is no good, as although we had a computer at the time, talk of online services came down to passing mentioned of BBSes...), and as it stands this page is no help at all :( 193.63.174.211 (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of introduction 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of ITU-T V-series recommendations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070104124418/http://fndcg0.fnal.gov/Net/modm8-94.txt to http://fndcg0.fnal.gov/Net/modm8-94.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should the US Robotics HST standard be listed in the Ad Hoc standards section?
Chris Fletcher (talk) 02:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  HST in Ad Hoc Standards 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of ITU-T V-series recommendations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170202062749/https://www.pricenfees.com/digit-life-archives/modem-compression-v-44-v-42bis to https://www.pricenfees.com/digit-life-archives/modem-compression-v-44-v-42bis
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060617021151/http://v92.com/faqs/ to http://www.v92.com/faqs/
*Added  tag to http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122limit/122x/122xa/122xa_2/ftv44mca.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I removed mention that the '96 variant of the V.34 spec had a 33.8k signaling rate. I've since been informed that there is a table buried in the spec that shows this number, but as far as I can tell this is some kind of internal technical note and not practical. The title of the spec plainly says "rates of up to 33 600 bit/s" and the summary lists 33.6 as the highest speed option above 28.8. Gravislizard (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  V.34 / 33.8