Talk:Australian Secret Intelligence Service

message: This article originally stated that in the 1983 Sheraton Hotel incident, the agents were arrested, and in an allegedly drunken state. I can't find any confirmation of that. Anyone have any? --K. 06:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey - with the impending anti-terrorist legislation about to go through - are we allowed to write about such secret squirrel stuff or do we risk getting done for sedition?  Do we have any martyrs out there?  Being only one of two d'angelos living in Canberra, with the possibility of arab ancestors from around 1,000 years ago, I'm definitely keeping my head down low.  I hereby formally state that I had nothing to do with this article and if I have said anything to offend anyone, I take it all back forthwith.  ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 11:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sheraton Hotel incident details

message: Once upon a time this article was very well referenced:  shows the last version where references were associated with specific facts. Then the references got "cleaned up", in the process dissociating them from the article text. This is going to be a bunch of hard work to restore since a years' worth of editing has gone on since then, I'm unlikely to get very far before heading off. So I'm leaving a note here on Talk: for others to pick up on. Bryan 06:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References need restoration work

message: As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: article supplies a reasonable to good depth of knowledge However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 10:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

message: :Image:Asisgov.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 12:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Asisgov.gif

message: The National Archives of Australia has released the records of the Royal Commission on Intelligence and Security under the 30 year rule. There is more than enough material to spin this off into a new article. 59.167.57.197 (talk) 08:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hope Royal Commission 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Australian Secret Intelligence Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asis.gov.au/mission.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517110717/http://news.ninemsn.com.au:80/article.aspx?id=66730 to http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=66730
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Australian Secret Intelligence Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506222928/http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2001-02/02bd011.htm to http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2001-02/02bd011.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=66730
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506222928/http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2001-02/02bd011.htm to http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2001-02/02bd011.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section seems out of place; its relevance to ASIS isn't clear, it contains a number of grammatical errors, and it seems to be written from a very specific point of view. Delete?
mnot (talk) 00:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratih Hardjono, Bruce Grant, & Gareth Evans section