Talk:RELX

message: Hi, I just wanted to bring your attention to the fact that Reed Exhibitions rebranded earlier this year and is now called RX. It would be great if that could be reflected on this page - it looks like it's already been done on the RX page itself. - Many thanks Ryoba (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. Dormskirk (talk) 08:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Exhibitions renaming

message: Hi, as well as the Reed Exhibitions > RX name change mentioned above, I'd like to flag a few other factual changes which should be updated on this article: 1. The Chair is now Paul Walker, 2. RELX is never written RElX and never has been, as claimed near the top - I have no idea where that came from! and 3. Under Governance, Adrian Hennah is no longer on the Board, but June Felix should be added. I'm happy to make these changes myself but suggesting them here first in case someone else wants to so we can avoid issues around WP:COI. Many thanks Ryoba (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: These changes seem to have been made. Dormskirk (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested change

message: Seriously, why should anyone take Wikipedia content about companies seriously? There is masses of out of date information on the page - the chair changed two years ago; the financials haven't been updated for two years; in November 2022, a contributor decided unilaterally that the New York listing was an ADS (it isn't, it's an ADR); ScienceDirect contains 19m items, not 13m; Elsevier publishes 600,000 articles a year, not 430,000; it says in 2019 that the University of California terminated its Elsevier subscription, but not that they eventually signed up to a four year deal in 2021; there's a long section on the cost of knowledge boycott, signed by 20,500 people over a decade, yet references to the 2.5m article submissions received by Elsevier were deleted. The cumulative effect is a page that has no credibility. PS: In the interests of transparency, I work for RELX and can't edit the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.176.82.34 (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for declaring your conflict of interest and posting on the talk page rather than making the edits. I will not feign surprise that the encyclopaedia relies on information that is 2 years old. If you share sources to support what you thinks need updating, others can use that to update the page. CT55555(talk) 16:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked the financials in the infobox as that is an item that I usually taken an interest in and update. However, they are currently up to date i.e. the most recent annual results are those for the year ended 31 December 2021. The company is not due to release its results for the year ended 31 December 2022 until 16 February 2023 i.e. tomorrow. I would be very happy to update the financials as soon the company issues the results. So, on that matter please direct any criticisms to the company, although in fairness, I think the company is to be complemented on issuing their results within 50 days of the year-end. So please don't be so harsh on them! Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now updated the financials in the infobox and taken the opportunity to make most of the other changes you suggested. For future updates, as requested above, please share sources to support what you think needs updating, so others can use that to update the page. Also, if you are now the company's representative, please can the company reflect on its tone? We are all volunteers here and the wikipedia community do not charge for content in the way that the company does. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies on the page