Talk:National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights

message: Due to edit-warring over whether the article is POV or not, it has been protected for three days.  Sort the dispute out here, please. Neil ム 08:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, the sources regarding NCDHR's endorsement of Dalit Voice propaganda are right here, in NCDHR's own website there is an endorsement of Dalit Voice strongman VT Rajshekhar. They certainly seem to finance and endorse anti-Semites and holocaust deniers. Looks like the references you cited don;t support your claims, or, if they do, are from unreliable sources like "newkerala" (the propaganda mouthpiece of the Naxalite Communist Party of India,a banned terrorist group).Benjamin P. Holder 00:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting that all these "users" protesting are single-purpose accounts (probably shills from Dalit Voice and socks/meatpuppets of a single user) and haven't found one counterpoint to the very simple fact that the organization endorses and is effectively run by holocaust denier and anti-Semite VT Rajshekhar. If they feature endorsements and propaganda by such anti-Semites then that certainly bears mentioning here. The Dalit rights movement has been hijacked by such racist and genocidal elements since a while back, as evidenced in a treatise on antisemitism by Leon Poliakov (see (1994). Histoire de l’antisémitisme 1945-93 (P.395). Paris.). To claim that they are only a "human rights group" working for the emancipation of the Dalits is a popular tactic used in India by numerous fundamentalist and subversive groups operating in the country, such as the National Development Front and the National Liberation Front of Tripura. It certainly works in India, where the media does not engage in any independent fact checking and the third world mentality causes them to lap up this nonsense. That does not erase the fact that they are a fundamentalist and subversive lot, as are these guys.Benjamin P. Holder 19:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

text:  You are very obviously trying to push your own POV and contradicting wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia is based on sourced information not personal views. Please read these pages to become a more productive editor. WP:NOR WP:RS WP:V --Neon white 00:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: It seems like the dispute is being slowly solved, since the article has now been edited to make it more objective. I have myself added references to the Rafto Prize and NCDHR Convenor Paul Diwakar which are both relevant articles concerning NCDHR. I still do not agree, however, that the edits made by Benjamin P Holder who claims that the organisation is anti-Semitic are objective; at least there should be more verifiable sources to support such claims. The references made to the statement by VT Rajshekhar are found on NCDHR's old website From Dalits.org. If you go to Dalits.org (i.e. the old website) you will find that the page has now been redirected to NCDHR's new website National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights Website. Due to the unresolved dispute I suggest that this article is referred to the discussion page on WikiProject India WP:IND. Palshøj 07:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there are no citations, then it should be removed, i dont see how there could be any ambiguity over that? --Neon white 00:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If it is anti-semitic, it should be possible to find a good source for the claim. An old web site does not fit the bill. Eiler7 21:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment 

message: There's a section in the article that is confusing:
"There have been allegations of spreading communalism, the stereotyping and scapegoating of non-Christian religions and forced conversions to Christianity in India[5]. They feature articles and endorsements by controversial figures such as VT Rajshekhar[6]."
I'm confused. Who is doing the alleging? Who is the alleged party? 
Also, the sentence beginning "They feature articles..." has very infelicitous phrasing. What is VT Rajshekhar endorsing? The allegations? Or the alleged bad actions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.189.255.82 (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations by whom directed at whom? 

message: If the NCDHR is internationalist, as claimed, why is it that the summaries for each of the four constituent bodies all clearly relate entirely to the situation in India. None of them demonstrate any work outside that country. This article is just another example of a Wikipedia-hosted Dalit PR piece based on sources that are almost entirely part of a walled garden. If the NCDHR is actually internationalist we need to see evidence of that: deeds, not words. - Sitush (talk) 20:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internationalism