Talk:Hiros

message: Should we start designing the articles as they go along instead of what happens to each character? Eventually they'll all meet up and Nathan's met Hiro and Niki, Peter met Mohinder and Isaac, and talked to Hiro, and D.L. finally showed up. I think it would be better. Please leave feedback and if there are valid reasons I won't change it.
BioYu-Gi!. 15:58, 24 October 2006.
:They're supposed to be in the order they're shown, not person by person.  This article needs a reorg, so It has the events in the shown order.--Ac1983fan(yell at me) 20:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, the article needs to be trimmed of its fat.  A synopsis should only focus on the major plot events; 5-6 paragraphs should suffice.  That's the usual length for the plot summaries of featured (film) articles (V for Vendetta, Casablanca, Jaws etc.) --Madchester 04:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...haven't the previous eps been detailed synopsises from beginning to end?  I attempted the character-by-character approach when I tackled the pilot episode, which ended up being out of viewing order, and someone went ahead and expanded it to viewing order.  Anyway, I can't get to it until tonight...damn dayjob... Toquinha 14:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Layout

message: I added a screencap to the infobox for this episode. Its the same one as they had for this episode on the List of Heroes episodes page. If anyone could think of a caption to go along with it, go ahead and add it. --GhostStalker 21:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The screencap seems really dark on non-descriptive.  I have to look at it carefully just to see that it's a vague image of a man.  Got something easier to see? SnappingTurtle 21:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, Turt. Could we get something a little lighter? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 22:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree, it is very non-descriptive. There should be something posted that is major to the plot line as well. --Pinkkeith 13:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The pic does some something major to the plot... Its D.L. Hawkins's second (or first, I dont remember) appearence and it shows his power, phasing. Also, the fact that he's in Nikki's home is big as well... --GhostStalker 23:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screencap 

message: As shown during the episode itself, the correct title of this episode is "Hiros", no apostrophe.  My cable provider's guide mistakenly inserted an apostrophe in its guide ("Hiro's"), which may be where User:Shannernanner got the wrong title from.  I have reverted the changes on this page and the episode list to the correct title.  --Psiphiorg 10:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NBC'S Website also had it as Hiro's.  Over at 9thwonders.com they had it without the apostrophe, and they also commented on how that one apostrophe changes the whole meaning of the title.  EnsRedShirt 10:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the copy/paste move currently found in Talk:Hiro's (from an older version of Talk:Hiros) be left as it is? This seems messy & confusing to have duplicated content in both places. Thanks -- 70.59.241.153 16:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is messy, I think we just need to agree on a dang spelling, and some naming conventions (See above) and stick to 'em.  EnsRedShirt 17:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well all of the internal links (outside of talk pages) are currently pointing to Hiros and not Hiro's (before they were about an evenly split mix). Consistancy seems to be useful while this is being sorted out. Thanks -- 70.59.241.153 17:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't say "thanks" all the time. We're not your lackies. Now, if we're all agreed on "Hiros", I'd say there's no problem. Just correct any other spelling as neeeded. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I meant no offence in using the word "thanks" in closing on my posts here; I thought I was just being polite. There is still the matter of the content, origionally taken from this talk page, that has been left at Talk:Hiro's. What, if anything should be done about that? <<Insert some form of polite, inoffensive closing phrase here>> -- 70.59.241.153 18:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry again, I see that  already took care of it here -- 70.59.241.153 19:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

text: It's okay, just a little unnecessary.. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 19:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode title 

message: The plot summary does not seem overly long compared to One Giant Leap, so I guess that means it might be confusing or ambiguous. The internal link in the cleanup template message for "confusing or ambiguous" leads to a dead anchor (#Writing on fiction) - here's a link to writing about fiction - though I can't seem to find details there about cleaning up confusing or ambiguous plot summaries. Perhaps I'm just missing it. Regardless, I think it's a safe bet to think the plot summary can use some loving attention. Junior rookie | Talk 15:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The synopsis is far too long.  It should be reduced to 5-6 paragraphs.  See WP:NOT, since plot summaries are technically not allowed on Wikipedia.  Also see featured articles on film topics, such as Casablanca or Dog Day Afternoon for appropriate length and content found in a synopsis. --Madchester 17:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i think it's fine the way it is. it's not any worse than the episode summaries for House or Kyle XY. dposse 17:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary cleanup 

message: The creepy robber guy looks a lot like john hensley from nip/tuck, I thought about adding this, but wasn't sure. J-stan 01:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[John Hensley]]

message: The episode summary was far too long so I did my best in shortening it. Still think it's too long but it's better then it was before. Lots42 12:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary 

message: "When the camera is panning around the train at the "frozen" people one of the people is Hiro, reading a newspaper. This is 17 seconds into the episode." I didn't notice this, but if it's true, it doesn't make sense. 'Present-day Hiro' is in Las Vegas, 'Future Hiro' is speaking to Peter on the train, so who's this 'third' Hiro? Or is it just an 'easter-egg', not meant to be part of the story?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.53.74.196 (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Hiro's on the subway