Template talk:WikiProject Musical Instruments

message: "This template should be used only when needed. Do not add this template to every talk page. In particular, it should not be added to otherwise empty talk pages." -- Template:Talkheader
¦ Reisio 00:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. Ouch.  OK - I didn't know that - I'll pull it now.  Thanks.  - NDCompuGeek 04:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  talkheader overkill 

message: === Future enhancements ===
What about some additional parameters on the template that I have seen on other templates, and seems to be useful (some of them):
* Peer Review - a simple "Y"es or "N"o (default [blank] is no)
* Immediate Attention - a flag to let the project members know that some issue with the article/page is urgently requiring help.  There's a list of things that could be put here - that's another discussion matter....
* Comments - a link going to the "/comments" subpage of the article/page, to allow the reviewer to comment on why the article deserves the review it got.  This page could also be used for just about any comments specifically about the ratings only (quality and importance) of the article, not the article itself (kind of contrary to what a talk page is).
* Signature - a field that would document who did the assessing to make it easier to question the reviewer to improve the article.  Could be linked in with the comments page though....
* √ Nested - to have multiple project headers "nested" in one large outer box
* Collapsible - option to shrink the project box
* √ Auto-stub-class - for automatic assessment of stub classes
Please, PLEASE participate and comment so we can advance on this, and in doing so improve the project!  - NDCompuGeek 21:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion requests 

message: What about some additional parameters on the template that I have seen on other templates, and seems to be useful (some of them):
* Peer Review - a simple "Y"es or "N"o (default [blank] is no)
* Immediate Attention - a flag to let the project members know that some issue with the article/page is urgently requiring help.  There's a list of things that could be put here - that's another discussion matter....
* Comments - a link going to the "/comments" subpage of the article/page, to allow the reviewer to comment on why the article deserves the review it got.  This page could also be used for just about any comments specifically about the ratings only (quality and importance) of the article, not the article itself (kind of contrary to what a talk page is).
* Signature - a field that would document who did the assessing to make it easier to question the reviewer to improve the article.  Could be linked in with the comments page though....
* √ Nested - to have multiple project headers "nested" in one large outer box
* Collapsible - option to shrink the project box
* √ Auto-stub-class - for automatic assessment of stub classes
Please, PLEASE participate and comment so we can advance on this, and in doing so improve the project!  - NDCompuGeek 21:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future enhancements 

message: Shouldn't this template, and this project for that matter, be name  (with a lower case "i" in "instruments"? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should. I think that's currently a redirect pointing to this template, though. V2Blast (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Catbox WPMusInst. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Magioladitis (talk) 07:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:Catbox WPMusInst" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]