Talk:IRIS-T

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:IRIS-T expo head2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:BGT IRIS-T SL Launcher-detoured.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Since the missile hasn't been used in combat (yet), I'm renaming and expanding.
/BP 78.70.77.35 (talk) 01:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Combat performance

message: 60g sounds plausible but 60deg/s sounds ridiculous and the link provided doesn't substantiate it.Z07x10 (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Turn performance

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on IRIS-T. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140423140358/http://portal.sipri.org/publications/pages/transfer/trade-register to http://portal.sipri.org/publications/pages/transfer/trade-register
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131024113307/http://www.revistatenea.es/revistaatenea/revista/PDF/documentos/Documento_1026.pdf to http://www.revistatenea.es/revistaatenea/revista/PDF/documentos/Documento_1026.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The UK isn't listed in the list of operators. Is that because UK Typhoons don't carry IRIS-T or is this an oversight?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.31 (talk) 12:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't UK Typhoons carry IRIS-T? 

message: The sentence beginning "One IRIS-T SLM battery, as supplied by Germany to Ukraine" has a context today on Oct 16, 2022.  Wikipedia will be around for years after this, and that sentence will lose its context.  Simply adding a date context doesn't necessarily fix it.  It needs a significant rewrite to incorporate that information in a timeless manner. 142.134.37.140 (talk) 21:32, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence referring to Ukraine deployment is merely temporal 

message: The above quote is a misreading of the Economist source: "Ukraine is to get one battery, which consists of three lorry-mounted launchers carrying 24 missiles (eight per launcher)" […] "an IRIS-T battery can launch and track all 24 of its missiles simultaneously" This does not mean that (only) 24 missiles were received. In fact it's highly unlikely that such a vital (and expensive) system would only receive one full set of ammunition. Directly related to this, but according to the website of the Federal government, Germany sent additional missiles as part of additional aid packages. The exact number was never disclosed. Since there is no reliable number of how many missiles Ukraine has received, I'm going to delete this sentence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DC:3F30:7F72:7020:20DC:AB8A:361A (talk) 13:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "By October 12, 2022, Ukraine was believed to have received 24 missiles." 

message: In multiple instances in the article, the IRIS-T is labeled a MRAAM, but in other instances the missile is labeled as a SRAAM.
According to the current sources on this article, the missile has a range of about 10+ miles. The modern AIM9 family of missiles, which is the primary SRAAM of NATO, has a comparable range; which makes it odd that the article refers to it to be a MRAAM. 2601:981:C281:D610:FC9C:1BA4:BD8B:6135 (talk) 20:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an Short Range or Medium range missile?