lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lam Chau

message: User:175.103.25.137 has been trying to get the disambiguation note at the top of the page, to the point that they have now violated the 3RR. I was only reverting their edits and advised them on their talk page to use proper formatting if the note is necessary. I didn't myself put in the note because I don't think it is necessary. I am not sure if I can violate the 3RR to undo this as it tows the line between vandalism and constructive. So, would someone please do something about this page? Either remove the note or format it, but beware that I have already tried removing and it didn't work. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 12:54, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to be confused with [[Lamma Island]]
Talk:Waglan Island

message: Rail transport in Hong Kong notes Waglan Island as the former site of a rail system of some kind. Judging from the geography, I don't see how that could be possible, but if anyone can point me to information regarding rail transport on this island, I should be very interested to see it. 97.102.30.205 (talk) 15:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Former rail system
Talk:Jack Clark (television personality)

message: Is that the only availible image of Jack Clark?  Is there one of higher quality anywhere that can be used for Wikipedia? --Coingeek (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:The Flyboys (film)

message: Is there a difference between this film and the film "Flyboys"?--Seventy-one 00:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Flyboys is a World War I film in wide release.  The Flyboys has seen only limited USA release. Conrad T. Pino 07:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did The Flyboys come in? It sais her thats what its called, and also on IMBD
But i saw it on sky premier last night and again today. It sais on TV guide it calls it Sky kids, also thats what it sais when the movie starts and its just going through clouds before anything realy happens.
So yeah.. where did The Flyboys come in?
Oh nevermind i didnt read the page properly :O
Yh Asakundwi.m (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flyboys??
Talk:Face (disambiguation)

message: * merge The difference between The Face and this article are really a little too slim to worry about. This article pretty much covers the same ground and the differences are largely down to the definitive article part of the naming policy. So I say move over the few that aren't currently here (the Sandman character should actually be here anyway as the name is worng ) and turn The Face into a redirect. (Emperor 01:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: What about a face in the graph theory? 213.134.182.121 (talk) 18:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Graph theory

message: The study of crystal faces were very important at the beginning of the crystallography of minerals. This entry must be in the disambiguation list. Now it's also important mainly due to the different physical properties of each face (microelectronics, pharmaceutics, jewellery, et.). Elies Molins (talk) 16:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Crystal faces

message: ...Face, the Marvel Comics character?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:73FF:E000:24CA:B8E:66B4:480E (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about...
Talk:Mike Johnson (linebacker)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) which is of relevance to this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 23:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Man Wa Lane

message: I have removed the  tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Marsh Road, Hong Kong

message: *I have removed the  tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Oğuz Atay

message: Tutunamayanlar, ‘those who cannot hold on’, was probably a word coined by Atay in the way that the agglutinative nature of Turkish allows. If the only other current use, in mountaineering, existed when he was writing he may well not have been aware of it. The Germans have a fairly satisfactory equivalent, ‘Die Haltlöse’, but it presents difficulties in English. The author of the UNESCO piece cited in the wiki article gives the title as ‘The Losers’.
Titles for translated works are often not fixed: e.g. Hermann Hesse’s ‘Das Glasperlenspiel’ first appeared in English as ‘Magister Ludi’, then in a different translation as ‘The Glass Bead Game’; Griboyedov’s play ‘Gore ot Uma’ has had at least five English titles over the years.  However, the equivalent used in the wiki article, ‘The Disconnected’, does seem necessary. An English translation was begun, with Atay’s approval and assistance,  actually when he was writing the book. The agreed translation for the key word tutunamayanlar was ‘disconnected’, and it was in knowledge of this that when he needed a Latin equivalent for tutunamayan for a mock encyclopaedia article (page 149) he came up with Disconnectus erectus. The wiki article mentions an existing English version, which, if it appears, will be published as ‘The Disconnected’, and also a section which has featured in a prize competition under this title.
A recent reviser substituted the title ‘The Good for Nothings’, I am sure with a genuine wish to make an improvement. Even if we thought it was an improvement (as I do not), it could only lead to confusion.
Litterateur (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title Tutunamayanlar 
Talk:MedHelp

message: That’s true; this article does not show too many editors but also does not match the criteria’s of Orphan article
Nassim Abi Chahine 22:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 March 26

message: Hey, what happened to 1.10 and 1.11?  It seems like there was no decision...?  Why are 1.09-1.12 stuck inside 1.08? Esn 01:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, closing requires a top and bottom template, and I forgot it when I initially closed #8.  I fixed it after an hour or so.  GRBerry 03:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Willets Point, Queens

message: While I removed a large section of POV material on redevelopment (that was placed in the wrong section of the article), some previously existing material on redevelopment remains.  I would suggest that the redevelopment information be examined for NPOV and expanded, or deleted. Jackollie (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am reinstating two external links that were improperly deleted on May 1, 2008. The links (to two videos hosted at the YouTube.com web site) conform to all Wikipedia content requirements. First, the videos are significant, scholarly, primary source material that is otherwise unavailable. Second, posting these video links violates no copyright, because I am the creator of the video contents and the holder of the copyright therein. Accordingly, pursuant to Wikipedia rules, any deletion of these links subsequent to the posting of this Notice shall constitute an act of vandalism, punishable by Wikipedia. HistoricalRecord (talk) 16:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but you skipped some steps. Please make your identity known to WP:OTRS so they can confirm that you qre the copyright holder, then, if they confirm it, you can re-add the links.  Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of Conformity - Two External Links Reinstated
Talk:Russians in Lithuania

message: I suggest moving this to Russian minority in Lithuania.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  01:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They tend to be named "Russians in X", at least on ru wiki; and compare: Russians in Ukraine and Russians in Kazakhstan. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 22:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Murray Hulbert

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/George Murray Hulbert was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --TommyBoy (talk) 18:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Mount Saint Mary College

message: except maybe physically.  how about a picture of the building in the logo,  which is an actual building used by the collete students.  i would bet less then 10% of the students have ever stepped in The Motherhouse buidling.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.252.143 (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Motherhouse is not the center of the campus
Talk:Landing helicopter assault

message: Article edited to include news of construction contract award for LHA 7. Information entered is sufficient (I think), but link needs to be incorporated, between new table entry and cite in the References section. I was unsuccessful at doing so (Wikipedia noobie here), will get back to this shortly and have another go.Sharl928 (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2012
Talk:Darwin (unit)

message: RE this sentence: "Inexplicably, Haldane defined the millidarwin as 10−9 darwins, despite the fact that the prefix milli- usually denotes a factor of one thousandth (10−3)".
I can't access the cited source, but this seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Haldane is quite unclear in the paper, but the millidarwin is defined in terms of a yearly rate of 10^-9, which is one thousand times smaller than the darwin (at a yearly rate of 10^-6, or change over 1 million years). 137.82.81.147 (talk) 22:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millidarwins 

message: How exactly are the initial and final "values" of a trait measured or quantified?
If this has yet to be determined and is only a mathematical model, then the equation itself is, arguably, arbitrary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.123.126 (talk) 21:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conceptual Nonesense 

message: bah--don't work on stuff in the middle of the night Vreejack 13:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a discussion of this page on talk.origins at  Humps 18:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see the April Fool's aspect of it via John Vreeland :o) --FeralOink (talk) 07:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  talk.origins discussion
Talk:Greg McGee

message: Support 2016 merge in proposal from Alix Bosco; pseudonym doesn't need a separate page, although it would be reasonable to separate out the crime writing into a different section. Currently, there is duplication of content on the two pages which would be resolved with a merge. Klbrain (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Barhi, Katni

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:CoffeeCup HTML Editor

message: Thanks for the comment on the article.  I am prepared to accept this page as a Good Faith edit, and will seek advice as to the CSD tag.  The reason it initially got tagged is that it looked like an advertisement, but if you are intending to lengthen and fill out the article with notable information, may I suggest you get started, or it may still get deleted.  Let me find a wikipedia Admin to seek advice from and I will drop a note here in a short while. Thanks Thor Malmjursson 02:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Your comments on this article. 

message: I have decided to assume good faith with this article, and I am gonna de-list it for speedy deletion.  What I would suggest now is that you lengthen the article as quickly as possible yourself, then get others to contribute as you suggest.  If the article is not improved significantly within 5 days, another user or I may relist it.  Regards, Thor Malmjursson 02:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  After discussion... 

message: "price of full Version is currently 49,- including Support." It's such fun to have to guess what currency it is! 80.3.47.25 (talk) 23:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  49 what? Euros, dinas, £, what? 

message: This application no longer supports WYSIWYG editing. It was taken out at version 12.5, I believe, or the next, and is no longer in the 2012 version. The 2010 version had it, but it had to be turned on under options, and HTML 4 selected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craxd (talk • contribs) 20:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a WYSIWYG editor
Talk:Empirical probability

message: The phrase "a posteriori probability" is also used to refer to posterior probability, and of course that's certainly a different thing. Michael Hardy 01:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I think the Sunrise_problem deserves a mention along with statistical models in the section of disadvantages, where the exact problem of estimating probabilities that are very high or very low is the background. Acknowledging that the sun a priori may rise or not rise, the best estimate of the probability counts one sunrise and one sunfail before the observations. This differs from the empirical estimate in a very simple and relatively intuitive way. (The sun is a bad example because we can so easily collect other evidence than sunrises that seemingly supports that it will rise. Choose another example, such as "What is the probability that existence exists tomorrow?", or... something better.)
37.44.138.159 (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sunrise problem
Talk:Rolls-Royce Conway

message: Do add Deryshire id its a Derby engine ... and remember in line cites required for DYK facts Victuallers (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I think the bypass generalities in "Background" should be taken out and integrated with Turbofan "Principles", not just copied mind you. Is that a good idea?Pieter1963 (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - have incorporated relevant new information into the turbofan article --harry543454 (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Move content to [[Turbofan]]
Talk:Shopping in Hong Kong

message: This page could use more experts on car, fashion shopping.  For cars, I know there is an unbelievable street area that sell the most insane cars like Aston Martin etc.  But I cannot think of where it is.  For fashion I know HK has a "hot color" for each year.  Anyone know enough to write about it?  Benjwong 01:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shopping Experts?
Talk:Rolls-Royce BR700

message: Hello,
Not sure what is going on, but this articles formatting is off.  The last edit was fine.
I can update and correct, but I cannot figure out what is wrong with this setup in this document to make the format show up on only half the page.
TIA
H  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.162.251.254 (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have fixed it for you, some wikicode was missing from the bottom of the infobox. Cheers Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting issue 

message: the major applications include the Tupolev 334 which was never launched and the "Rekkof" versions of the Fokker F70/F100 that have not been launched yet. I'll delete those - anybody have solid info if the original Fokker aircraft also use this engine?
Mark 84.143.171.94 (talk) 21:58, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  major applications 

message: The photo of N711SW is a G550 which uses the BR710. I admit is an excellent photo showing the engine exhaust, and I cannot find a photo of a G650 which uses the BR725 under CC license. Hopefully someone with more time and a better knowledge of CC can find a suitable photo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.216.14.12 (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  BR725 Photo 

message: As this engine is designed in Germany and the UK, Wikipedia Manual of Style would dictate metric units as primary, the basic design is metric. Avi8tor (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Units
Talk:Williams FJ44

message: In this article the kilonewton / pound-force conversions are mangled, or at least the content of the table massively contradicts the contents of the many body text regarding thrust values.
Would people please stop using anglosaxon units, it is so bronze age! How many hogsheads to the furlong does you new shiny fully carbon composite jet get? Use the damn freedom system of measurements (also known as SI for the non-francophiles)! 82.131.210.162 11:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an American engine, so American conventions are used here. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 17:31, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customary strikes again 

message: 1900 lbf does not correspond to(2.58 kN), but 8.54kN. Completely agree with prevous note.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.80.98.8 (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the conversions should be corrected if they are incorrect. But English-WP allows US Customary measurements to be used in articles, and this is not the place to try to change that. - BillCJ (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrust 

message: Williams FJ44-4M-34used in the new Aermacchi M-345HET jet trainer. http://newatlas.com/leonardo-m-345het-maiden-flight/47190/ Bizzybody (talk) 03:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another model Williams FJ44-4M-34
Talk:Rolls-Royce Turbomeca Adour

message: Update?
http://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/customers/defence-aerospace/adour-mk951-turbofan-brochure-tcm92-51510.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.132.216 (talk) 09:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Template talk:Women's colleges that became coeducational

message: This template is totally unorganized and is incomplete. Rpgman456 01:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Although the history is complicated, Florida State University should be properly understood as being founded as a women's college and should be included on this list, I believe. See third paragraph of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Florida_State_University  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.127.136.98 (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida State
Talk:Rolls-Royce Pegasus

message: could somebody please provide some illustrations (explanations, graphics, photos) that clarify the functioning of the essential parts of the turbine, the thrust vectoring swivelling nozzels? (the rest is a fairly normal turbine, right?) thanx! --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 11:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: illustration of the swivelling nozzels?
Talk:Turbo-Union RB199

message: could you clarify the multiple "AGARD CP" references please? Mark83 (talk) 06:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done that. Hope it's OK.Pieter1963 (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The formatting isn’t perfect. But thank you for the extra detail, it’s now very clear where it has come from. I’ll tweak when I get a chance. Mark83 (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference queries 

message: Please remove if satisfied.Pieter1963 (talk) 23:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template message
Talk:Rolls-Royce Nene

message: What is the right prononciation for this engine?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.229.162 (talk) 19:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The same as for the River Nene - i.e., neen - it rhymes with queen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.27.229.162 (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Small question

message: < the Nene used a double-sided centrifugal compressor for improved pressure ratio >
(i) double-sided would increase (double, even) the airflow, not the pressure ratio
(ii) Weren't the earlier engines also using a double-sided impeller? so this wasn't new on the Nene anyway?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.41.244 (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, the single-sided compressor was used by de Havilland on the Goblin and Ghost, both designed by Frank Halford, RR preferring a double-sided one for its centrifugal engines such as the Welland, Derwent, and Nene, which were directly descended from Whittle's ideas. In the early days, the airflow possible - and hence power produced - for a given impeller (compressor) diameter was limited by the available materials, due to the centrifugal forces and creep, which limit the ultimate engine rpm, so for a given size, with a double-sided impeller the airflow could be increased without a corresponding increase in impeller diameter, or increase in rpm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.220.131 (talk) 10:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 
Talk:H. M. Baker

message: On further perusal, I see that the form "H.M. Baker" rather than "H. M. Baker" is dominant. Should I move this? Ventifax 22:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No I think the gap is the approved style: H. R. Giger and H. G. Wells. Although you might want to check the style guide.  (Emperor 22:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Got a reliable source for that? 98.248.33.198 (talk) 03:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I've managed to find only the author's own posts on a Serbian forum (http://www.upps-sajt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3123&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=160). Not exactly wikipedia material, I know. It's funny because this very article is mentioned there. I'll keep looking for more reliable sources. Still it's true, so it'd be silly to leave the info as it is. Jackalope99 (talk) 06:42, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I think "H. M. Baker" should be merged into Branislav Kerac article. --Stripar (talk) 22:56, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --129.72.176.10 (talk) 00:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging?
Talk:Rolls-Royce Turbomeca RTM322

message: Should this article be called Rolls-Royce Turbomeca RTM322 without the /. Two reasons the company is called Rolls-Royce Turbomeca and the slash causes problems in linking in wiki - refer Wikipedia:Articles with slashes in title. MilborneOne (talk) 22:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. Being bold and moving. - BillCJ (talk) 23:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Safran (TM's parent) bought out Rolls-Royce from this programme in April 2013:
http://www.safran-group.com/media/20130423_safran-enters-definitive-agreement-purchase-rolls-royce-share-joint-rtm322-helicopter-engine-programme
almost two years ago.
109.145.108.97 (talk) 15:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turbomeca  takeover 

message: The two links pointing to the external pages hosted by Rolls Royce and Turbomeca seem to be outdated. The first points to a general page about Rolls Royce activities in defence and the second returns a 404 error. A Jackson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.155.109 (talk) 19:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links 