lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chinshakiangosaurus

message: It's an advance pub; hopefully it'll be out soon so we can get the page and volume info. Stolen from the DML:
Geological Magazine
Advance publication
A re-evaluation of Chinshakiangosaurus chunghoensis Ye vide Dong 1992
(Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha): implications for cranial evolution in basal
sauropod dinosaurs
PAUL UPCHURCH, PAUL M. BARRETT, ZHAO XIJIN and XU XING
Abstract
Re-description of the left dentary of Chinshakiangosaurus chunghoensis
reveals that it possesses an unusual combination of ?prosauropod? and
?sauropod? character states. Cladistic analysis places Chinshakiangosaurus
as one of the most basal sauropods known currently. Mapping of dentary and
dental characters onto the most parsimonious topologies yields insights
into the sequence of acquisition of a number of feeding-related characters.
For example, it seems that basal sauropodomorphs (traditional prosauropod
taxa) possessed a fleshy cheek that attached to the mandible along a marked
ridge, and that the same structure was present in the most basal sauropods.
The early sauropod skull developed a lateral plate that reinforced the
bases of the tooth crowns labially, and had wrinkled tooth enamel and a
concavity on the mesial portion of the lingual part of each crown, while
retaining a fleshy cheek and a relatively weak symphysis. More advanced
sauropods (eusauropods) lost the cheek, perhaps in order to increase the
gape of the jaws in response to a change in feeding style that involved
collection of larger quantities of poor quality foliage.
J. Spencer 17:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: And here it is
Talk:Try for the Sun: The Journey of Donovan

message: I don't quite understand this article. It contains important material that is already in other articles. Does it need its own article? The Donovan article does not appear to mention it. Redirect? Merge? Leave in place? I'm trying to resolve the tag....input, please. --Stormbay (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non notable tag - longstanding 

message: While the title for this box set compilation is inspired by Donovan's song "To Try For The Sun", it's official & correct title is "Try For The Sun." BruceCMcD (talk) 16:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. After three and a half years, I moved the article to the correct title. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Article Title
Talk:William of Sens

message: He never was able to work again. He allegedly gave the job to a 
  monk but he felt that he would be outcasted from monastic society 
  and gave it to a man known only as William the Englishman.
  He completed the eastern portion of the church, and finished it in 1184.
If I knew what this was supposed to mean I'd rewrite it myself. The most logical interpretation is that W. Sens gave the job to a nameless monk, who gave it to W. Englishman, who completed the job in 1184. However, the text as written is ambiguous and without knowing the true events I don't want to touch it. And "outcasted" is not a very nice word. James Fryer 22:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Jack Smith (film director)

message: I just removed the name of David Lynch from the list of artists influenced by Jack Smith, as Lynch recently stated (see "IMS Engage 2014: David Lynch In Conversation with Moby", 10'49") that he doesn't know Smith. --Pinakell (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Lynch 
Talk:Quintus Aurelius Symmachus

message: If you called Symmachus a pagan, you would've been insulting him: see this definition of "Pagan" from the great Peter Brown, from which I give an extract:
:"The adoption of paganus by Latin Christians as an all-embracing, pejorative term for polytheists represents an unforeseen and singularly long-lasting victory, within a religious group, of a word of Latin slang originally devoid of religious meaning. The evolution occurred only in the Latin west, and in connection with the Latin church. Elsewhere, 'Hellene' or 'gentile' (ethnikos) remained the word for 'pagan'; and paganos continued as a purely secular term, with overtones of the inferior and the commonplace."
There was no such thing as "paganism" at the time of Symmachus; there were the traditional religions of antiquity that Symmachus attempted to preserve in the face of Christian hegemony. People who had not converted to Christianity, particularly educated people such as Symmachus and Libanius, called themselves Hellenes if they wished to make a point of it. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One definition is not the be-all, end-all - you have to take into account how "pagan" is used in modern English.50.111.19.250 (talk) 18:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symmachus was not a 'pagan' 
Talk:Coelophysis

message: This might be outdated but I remember reading somewhere that Rioarribasaurus was given to a more complete specimen. I feel that the way this article mentions Rioarribasaurus fails to properly bring up the the fact that people have debated over which name should be given to the dinosaur. Ceratosaur635 (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is discussed in detail under Classification as far as I can see? Should probably be under history/discovery, though. FunkMonk (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah my apologies it must not have popped out to me. Thank you for the clarification. Ceratosaur635 (talk) 16:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rioarribasaurus
Category talk:International and regional union federations

message: I created this cat to merge :Category:International union federations and :Category:Regional union federations. On reflection, after starting the regional cat a few weeks ago, it is a bit arbitrary to separate the two. There is very little, if any, difference and having them together will make it easier to search. Another option would have been to place the regional cat within the international cat, but I don't think that solves anything as many of the larger federations also have regional sub-sections, and it would just get more confusing. I left the two original cats as soft redirects here.--Bookandcoffee 22:54, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Coloradisaurus

message: I'm starting a discussion here to get opinions from other editors about the wording of the taxonomy section. Should my original wording be used or should Miracusaurs' rewording be used? Carnoferox (talk) 18:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have attempted to reword the section in a way that falls in line with what does and does not need to be attributed per WP:INTEXT. A statement like "should be attributed" is an opinion which merits in-text attribution, but most of the rest of it only needs a citation, unlike Miracusaurs's rewording. Ornithopsis (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the wording as it was by Carnoferox and also Ornithopsis is best, as it arranged the series' of events chronologically while still explaining how the problems arose. IJReid  20:09, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made some slight changes to Ornithopsis' wording but largely agree with his version. See if these edits are reasonable. Carnoferox (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: His edits do indeed seem reasonable. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording of the taxonomy section
Talk:Condorraptor

message: What does "fully-jointed" mean? Is it fully articulated, and if so, wouldn't it be better to say so? Contributions/97.104.210.67 (talk) 14:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Articulated would be the word; it's probably a translation issue. J. Spencer (talk) 02:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Professor of Poetry

message: Is this linked to the right guy - it doesn't seem that likely...
CPCHEM 22:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hugh Jones 

message: Links removed that were broken, listed here. Further new/useful links would be most welcome!
*Professor of Poetry Election
*Oxford Professors of Poetry
--gobears87 (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:Craspedodon

message: Wow. That's a pretty big change (though clearly there have been more drastic taxonomic reassignments (Mesozoic dinosaurs to Cenozoic mammals, dinosaurs to petrified wood), the possible error stood for a very long time. Also: Europe?! Firsfron of Ronchester 22:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ceratopsian?
Talk:Crichtonsaurus

message: Hi, 
I was just looking through the article and it seems the links to Michael Crichton's webpage [1] and the Dinosaur Mailing List [6] are broken. I think Crichton has a new page discussing Crichtonsaurus with his other accolades, but I'm not sure how this citation is relevant to the sentence discussing Bohlin and Peking Man. These articles from De Gruyter and JSTOR discuss Bohlin's involvement in the discovery of the fossil.
The email cited on the Dinosaur Mailing list can be accessed through the Internet Archive or the DML Archives hosted by Reptipage.
I hope these suggestions can help improve the article.
Tamarindrind (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links? 

message: — Assignment last updated by COM4850prof (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Media and Mis-Disinformation
Talk:Tweek Tweak

message: In the "South Park" slash community, Tweek is often "slashed" with background character Craig. This may or may not be true but the assertion is unsourced. 
In addition, I suggest that all references to South Park slash fiction be presented within a single article. John Reid 22:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slash 

message: yeah the first sentence.....isnt first name and surname the same thing?--Lygophile 00:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, surname means last name, the sentence is correct. Tweeks Coffee 17:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  first name, surname 

message: I've often seen Tweek's name written as either "Tweek Tweak" or the other way 'round.  Of course, this is only in the fanfiction community, and fanfic writers are a bunch of airheads anyway. 10:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's just a fanon name.  Same thing with Craig getting the surname of Nommel.  Tweek's name at least has some basis, but it's still not an established fact. Tweeks Coffee 13:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name? 

message: Seriously, is it worth noting that Tweek had lice once? I don't think so. Misteryoshi 11:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lice? 

message: I don't know if this character deserve his own article or if he should be on this List of students at South Park Elementary#Tweek Tweak, but since he is not mentionned in the list, I reverted the redirection. Master Sel (talk) 05:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection to the list of students
Talk:Cryptovolans

message: The controveries regarding this species are not adequately addressed in this article. In particular, this species is described in  as having symmetical wings (indicating lack of flight)). If subsequent data has conclusively overturned the conclusions of the Nature article, this should be mentioned explicitly. Addtional citations should be given for many of the statements in this article, such as that this species may be a "junior synonym for Microraptor"
Rustavo 04:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Czerkas, in the paper naming Cryptovolans, disputes Norell's claim that the wing feathers are asymmetrical. Czerkas claims that feathers adjacent to the symmetrical ones pointed out by Norell are in fact asymmetrical, as are the feathers of the referred specimen. Sounds like the symmetrical feathers cited by Norell may have been secondaries or contour feathers, with asymmetrical primaries. Dinoguy2 (talk) 15:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristics of feathers, classification 

message: The link to the model of Cryptovolans pauli by Boban Filipovic is broken. A short search in Google doesn't reveal a new location.
81.223.91.228 20:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Internet Archive had replacements, so I stuck them in. J. Spencer 20:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Cumnoria

message: c u m noria 202.187.150.64 (talk) 06:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lol
Talk:Joseph Walshe

message: Joe Walshe was not a minister -- he was a civil servant.  For a list of ministers, see Ministers for External Affairs (1922-1971)
-- BrownHairedGirl 23:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A minister can also refer to a senior ranking diplomat.   Kransky 15:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Joe's job

message: Joseph Walshe did not 'retire' to Rome in 1946. He was appointed Ireland's Ambassador to the Holy See in that year - the first Irish diplomat to be appointed at ambassadorial rank.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.31.92 (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious inaccuracy
Talk:Diana Ross Presents The Jackson 5

message: Should be moved to capitals as used in text ("the Jackson 5"). Rothorpe (talk) 03:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title commentary 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:Diana Ross Presents The Jackson 5 →  – Per MOS:THEMUSIC. —Matthew - (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: fyi: title case vs. sentence case. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 18:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

text: *Does this count? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 May 2022
Talk:Webster (TV series)

message: I have only vague memories of the series, so I can't say for certain that the following is incorrect:
: "...a successful lawsuit by his uncle forced Webster to live with his Aunt Charmaine in the Cabrini-Green federal housing project of Chicago. Webster is delighted to find a job as the bat boy for the Chicago White Sox at the nearby Comiskey Park,..."
... but Cabrini-Green is nowhere near Comiskey Park. I suspect this is simply a case of someone metonymically refering to CHA projects in general by the name of a single notorious exemplar.
Chances are this actually should refer to Stateway Gardens, but not knowing this for certain, I'll only edit Cabrini-Green out and leave the statement as a general reference to "a federal housing project in Chicago." 68.252.240.252 23:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: you are lying about the source.  It is not in that issue at all. 100% positive.  Check it yourself at your local library on some lovely microfiche. The last episode was called WebTrek where they parodied Star Trek.  This is even cited in the article!  While your made-up episode is much more creative, let's leave it where it is... in your imagination. 12.34.246.36 11:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: And because it didn't happen.  Make up sources all you want, but it didn't happen and the Sun-Times would never write an article about a sitcom finale that wasn't hugely popular 12.34.246.4 14:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah the citations that exist and are tangible point to Web-Trek being the final episode.  Being that there are no tangible or viewable citations for the "batboy" thing we have to put Web-Trek as that episode.12.34.246.35 11:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've edit protected this article for one week.  Please refactor incivility and seek dispute resolution.  An article content request for comment is probably the best route. DurovaCharge! 19:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection
Talk:Odile of Alsace

message: This article seems to be about two separate people, one of whom seems not even to be called 'Odile' as the main name.  I suggest splitting it accordingly. Any objections? Feline Hymnic (talk) 19:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in the least.  I've been meaning to do it myself for some time, but never seem to get around to it.  Thanks for reminding me, incidentally - I may get to it before you. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It will probably better if you do it. I don't know anything about these people, so I would probably get it wrong.  Nor am I familiar with the conventions around WP naming of saints, so I would probably get the titles wrong too. Feline Hymnic (talk) 22:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be two separate articles 

message: Most of the text seems to narrate a legend, but it's not indicated as such, nor is any source mentioned. As the list of external links looks quite complete, I guess those are the sources. It would be nice if maybe the original author would connect the text with its sources. Right now the whole thing hangs in the air, more so as other languages' Wikipedia articles give different accounts.
Ah yes: would it be useful to add a list of places where she is venerated? I could translate it from the German article.--Geke (talk) 11:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please cite sources
Talk:The Jacksons (album)

message: There is currently very little information in the tour article (which is also unreferenced). I think at the moment, unless more content can be added, the tour is only really worthy of a mention in the album article. — GasHeadSteve [TALK] 08:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[The Jacksons Tour]]
Talk:Goin' Places (The Jacksons album)

message: There is currently very little information in the tour article (which is also unreferenced). I think at the moment, unless more content can be added, the tour is only really worthy of a mention in the album article. — GasHeadSteve [TALK] 07:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[The Jacksons Goin' Places Tour]]
Talk:Civilization (Bob Hilliard and Carl Sigman song)

message: I just created a stub for  "Whispering" Jack Smith, and this article was already linking to a previously non-existant article. It turns out that the Jack Smith who did this 1947 version of "Civilization" was actually a different Jack Smith -- "Smilin' Jack Smith"... therefore I will create yet another stub... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larrybob  (talk • contribs) 23:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whispering Jack Smith 

message: There's a 1954 Sophia Loren film in which an Italian version of this song is used digetically repeatedly throughout the movie.  IMDB and TCM both give a credit for Music to Alessandro Cicognini, but the vocals were female, and I got the idea it was a pop song in Italy at the time.  Anybody have more info on this version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykej  (talk • contribs) 01:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Bad She's Bad (Peccato che sia una canaglia)
Talk:Destiny (The Jacksons album)

message: Could someone knowledgeable please write articles for the tracks on this album? I was surprised to find that no article for "Blame it on the Boogie", one of my favourite tracks, hasn't been written yet.
Cheers,
Djbb2 15:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles for these tracks, please! 
Talk:The Jacksons Live!

message: Does anyone have a source for the album title used here (The Jacksons Live!)? Particularly the use of the exclamation mark. I have an original copy of the album (admitedly a UK copy and if the US version is different, that would be the primary source) and the cover, as shown in the article, just has the band logo and the word 'Live' written in the lights but it is clear on both the spine and the labels that the title of the album is just Live with The Jacksons as the artist. Strictly speaking, the title of the article should be Live (The Jacksons album) or at least the exclamation mark be dropped.--Retro junkie (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Template talk:Infobox extrasolar planet

message: I think we shouldn't have these question marks there.  We could just put them in when we make them.— HurricaneDevon @ 23:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are default values: if you don't supply an actual value for the quantity, you get those question marks. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 23:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But I just highlight the info from the box, I don't copy a box from another artical.  These question marks hide these things.  I would like it if these QMs wern't there. — HurricaneDevon @ 23:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can open the template edit into another window, or write down the variables. Wikicode should never be visible in the articles, it's only for those who edit articles.--Jyril 06:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionmarks

message: Is there any way to make the name at the top of the extrasolar planet box smaller, at present it is larger than the starbox (often found on the same pages as this template) header, which looks odd. Chaos syndrome 00:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a quick fix. The large title is derived from infobox template style, and I used smaller font here which cancels it. Better ideas are welcome.--Jyril 06:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: With the more discoveries of planets with years, masses, and radii similar to Earth, we ned to be prepared.  Similar to the { ly ( pc)}, I put a separated thing where you could put the planets orbit in years, earth mass, and earth radius.  I also made it so it dosn't make more room by making it blank (for not earth-related planets) — HurricaneDevon @ 20:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put it to the test in PSR 1257+12. — HurricaneDevon @ 23:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrestrial planet information 

message: If only one of the parameters period and period_year is specified then the template does not leave a ? in the box. Same applies for mass and mass_earth. Chaos syndrome 17:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optional parameters
Talk:Horrendous Disc

message: Someone wants a citation about fan reaction? I run the band's official website and can attest to the all three of the current requests for a citation. The reactions are not mentioned in a news story or an article, but are all over the band's website, message board and received in emails. What more is needed exactly? Audiori (talk) 03:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source that supports the fan reaction to the Norman performed song included in the re-issue. It is from a blog which I realize is not acceptable by Wiki standards. Since it is an actual fan reaction I've used it as a temp cite until I can find a better source.THX1136 (talk) 00:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

message: "Aside from live performances, music from the album, the test pressing, was first heard by the public on the Rock & Religion Radio Show on January 20, 1980."
I can guess what was intended, but do not want to assume my guess is correct. Willing to do the edit and would welcome some clarification from the editor who put this together (Audiori??) 
My assumption: "Aside from live performances, music, from the album and the test pressing, was first heard by the public on the Rock & Religion Radio Show on January 20, 1980." Thanks for any input.THX1136 (talk) 13:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That's pretty close. I would write it  Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence intent
Talk:¡Alarma! (album)

message: What specifically needs a citation? That the band had a multimedia tour? Or that it was unusual in the early 80s? Audiori (talk) 03:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still need clarification on this. Audiori (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled