lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Journal of Paleontology

message: The two sources I've found seem to have different opinions on who the editors of this journal are. Cambridge University Publishing lists one Ellen Currano as the editor-in-chief, alongside several other editors, while BioOne says Brenda Hunda is editor-in-chief. One Steve Hageman is listed as an editor in the infobox, but I can't find any evidence of him being an editor of the journal (the other editor listed in the infobox, Brian Pratt, is listed as an editor at the Cambridge University Publishing link). I'm not sure who to believe, but either way, the list of editors in the infobox needs updating Ethmostigmus (talk) 10:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors?
Talk:Ester (footballer)

message: http://www.cob.org.br/midias/2012/07/26/downloads/8cWbXDBQhqHRk2w7Ttde2edabe.pdf
http://www.santosfc.com.br/futebol/elenco/jogador.asp?c=F&i=114  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.253.65.219 (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nora Blansett

message: There are more websites relating to the artist Nora Blansett than there are Kylie InGold, who has less credible information regarding her life and work. If artists such as Amy Brown and Nora Blansett are to be removed, with far more credits to their names (including winning prestigious awards such as the Froudian Art Awards), then should there not be a complete overhaul of current, living fantasy artists? Frivilousity 18:42, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Spike and Tyke

message: Tyke is friend to Jerry and nuisance to Tom. Shouldn't it be Spike is a friend to Jerry and a nuisance to Tom? TobytheTramEngine 18:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here are the two: Give and Tyke and Scat Cats. Sorry everyone, they will have to go. But the point is, what's wrong with it? Is it too short? TobytheTramEngine (talk) 18:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, please don’t, Tyke is very cute, even though it’s short, dogs are very very cute. 75.129.125.47 (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up for deletion
Talk:Baggage allowance

message: I would like to inform some people that the edit I made was actually fixing a typo error (and it was reverted). If it is a quote of any sort, I can understand that. I don't want to violate 3RR even if I'm right, so I decide to brought this up. If you believe "accross" is correct, the actual spelling is across, per here. What do you think?
:I see what you're saying. My mistake. It has been fixed. I know the correct spelling. I was looking at the wrong comparison when I reverted it. My mistake. The correct spelling is of course across. Carter | Talk it up 05:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling controversy... 

message: i expected the term "baggage allowance" not just to refer to weight and number of pieces, but also to size / max. measurements of checked luggage, which is not covered or mentioned in the article.
as i am not a native speaker, i apologize in case i'm completely mistaken on this.
77.185.230.148 (talk) 12:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  maximum size? 

message: This is a much better article:  http://www.airfarewatchdog.com/blog/3801089/airline-baggage-fees-chart/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.127.226.225 (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately it doesn't work like that. Every ticket can have different allowances, it is dependent on many many factors.Robijn (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely worthless article without a list of airlines and a list of their charges per bag
Talk:Conrad Weygand

message: The name of Conrad Weygand is mentioned in several publications
* Note 5: Compare establishing an "aryan chemistry" by Paul Walden and Conrad Weygand to the establishment of an "aryan Physics"
* Conrad Weygand (1890-1945) - ein Vertreter der "Deutschen Chemie" (a member of "German Chemistry". In the book : W. G. Pohl (Hrsg.): Naturwissenschaft und Politik. Schwerpunkt die Jahre 1933 bis 1955. Linz 1997, pages. 81-91. 
* Conrad Weygand und die „Deutsche Chemie". In: Christoph Meinel/Peter Voswinckel (Hrsgg.): Medizin, Natur-wissenschaft, Technik und Nationalsozialismus. Stuttgart 1994, S. 183-191.
*  Naturwissenschaft, Technik und NS-Ideologie: Beiträge zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte des Dritten Reiches Herbert Mehrtens; Steffen Richter 
Technology and Culture, Vol. 22, No. 4. (Oct., 1981), pp. 825-828.
He also wrote a book : Titel: 	Deutsche Chemie als Lehre vom Stoff  author: Conrad Weygand, Halle (Saale) : Niemeyer, 1942--Stone 18:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:AS Djerba

message: http://asdjerba.oldiblog.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.224.161.68 (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  association sportive de djerba ( ASD ) 
Talk:Journal of the Royal Society Interface

message: #We do not write in the first person. "You can submit" is promotional. Giving the link to submit articles is promotional also. I've fixed this.
#We also do not give the links to individual issues of the journal. The journal has a website for the purpose. I've fixed this, too
#We do not list the members of the editorial board; only the editor in chief. I've fixed this, too
#It is acceptable to list certain noteworthy papers, but be prepared to show why they are noteworthy, as by citation count. When you do list them, include the full bibliographic references , not just the link. If the journal is published in paper also, it should be possible to find it in paper from the information given. See WP:CITE for the formats.  I leave this for you. 
#Please double check that none of the prose, such as the list of subjects covered, is copied from the journal web site. 
#Have there been any references providing substantial coverage about this new journal from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. If so, add them. (I would imagine, for example, that it was mentioned in Nature). DGG (talk) 16:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Bandages (song)

message: is this the song that was banned from bbc radio play at the beginning of the war in iraq in 2003? jess (talk) 00:32, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Journal of the Travellers Aid Society

message: This is a Journal of the Travellers Aid Society and should be part of the main article. Sciencefish (talk) 22:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support. It is just a compilation issue of a periodical. Unless particularly individually and independently notable, it doesn't deserve an article. oknazevad (talk) 10:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[The Best of the Journal of the Travellers' Aid Society, Volume 2]] into [[Journal of the Travellers Aid Society]]
Talk:Journal of the United States Artillery

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 16:56, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Kosmas – Czechoslovak and Central European Journal

message: I propose to merge the current text into Czechoslovak Society of Arts and Sciences (SVU), the publisher. The journal provides useful service in its field but IMHO there's not enough independent material to have reasonable WP article. Most of the information on SVU website is about financial difficulties due to low subscription numbers and lack of editors: in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2006. Pavel Vozenilek 01:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Mamba (candy)

message: I just bought some Mamba Sour and they do not taste sour to me. Its been a long time since I've had original Mambas but these taste as sour as plain Starburst. No strong malic acid taste like in every other sour candy. Its like they noticed the Sour craze and thought "These are technically sour, lets just tag that on there" 24.99.56.15 15:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Storck website's press release said the sour chews "will be available beginning in July and only for the summer holidays". I don't have any idea otherwise - do you have a source that says it's not a limited edition? Somno 03:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sour taste

message: "Mamba" has the following trademark registration numbers (smaller number = older): 1553041, 2064487, and 4152424; view here: 
Hopefully that helps. --75.71.229.53 (talk) 06:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trademark 
Talk:Gwen Frostic

message: As an occasional visitor to her Benzonia shop over the decades startingin the 70's, I don't beieve it is correct to say she resided there until her death.  It is my understanding in several talks with employees that she spent most of her time in her later years in Arizonia, I think Tuscon.  At the very least it is incomplete not to mention AZ.71.31.152.22 (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence 

message: Either a photo of Frostic herself or a piece of her artwork would help to improve this article. I can't find anything that's freely licensed so if somebody could provide one.. --ImmortalGoddezz 20:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: I've removed the subheaders that were added to the article because the article really isn't long enough to merit that many subheaders. Most of the sections that it was broken down into contained only 1 to 2 sentences. If more information were added to make the sections longer then I could see the merit of having subheaders but given the length of the article it breaks it down too much. In addition to that the article wasn't edited to encompass the subheaders; eg. sections still contained information that should have been within another subheader. Please don't blatantly revert without discussing on here, thanks. --ImmortalGoddezz (t/c) 16:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of subheaders

message: Thanks so much for this article. Gwen was a friend of my grandmothers (family legend is my grandmother lent her money for her first printing press).  Anyway we have some family pictures of her as well as an image she made of our cottege in Beulah many years ago which I presume are ours (we have the blocks).
I will see what I can dig up.
Gerbera (talk) 23:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Will work on it
Talk:Timeline of Quebec history (1760–1790)

message: In the Timeline of Quebec History there is the following statement:
1760 - French-Canadian Forces defeat the British on the Plains of Abraham on April 26. 
However, the link to the Plains of Abraham brings up an article that indicates that it was the British who were victorious.
: In the Battle of Sainte-Foy of 28 April 1760 the French were victorious over the British.  In the preceding Battle of the Plains of Abraham of 13 September 1759 the British were victorious over the French.  The Plains of Abraham and The Battlefields Park articles are currently short on details of the Battle of Sainte-Foy that took place there (although the former does link to the article, it does not mention "French victory" nor what happened in 1760). 67.86.74.107 (talk) 00:50, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Le Petit Journal (newspaper)

message: "...published from 1863 to 1944."
The history of the newspaper as presented in this article seems to extend only to about 1900. There is nothing to back up that 1944 end date. In addition to the external links with to issues up to 1940, Google News Archive has issues that span from 1870 to 1976, though sporadic at each end of that range. Somewhere along the line it seems to have become a weekly. There is a current website for Le Petit Journal, but I don't know if it's associated with the original newspaper or not: http://lepetitjournal.com/
If someone is able to navigate French, the history of this paper needs to be examined further.
Thanks, Wordreader (talk) 07:26, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of paper? 

message: I second the motion. Is this an article about the newspaper or an article about sporting events? In the original French the "Compétitions sportives" section consists of two very short paragraphs. This entire article comes very close to being off-topic.  WQUlrich (talk) 23:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Added what I could. I'm hesitant to delete big chunks without a consensus....although virtually all of the sporting event material is repeated in the article on Pierre Giffard.  WQUlrich (talk) 00:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Lacking a consensus, took the middle ground and blanked that section with a note why. WQUlrich (talk) 20:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The subject of this article is....?
Talk:Akatsuki-iro no Senpuku Majo

message: My bad - the yuri claim probably doesn't need the citation.  I removed it because I didn't see the claim - it's made in the infobox, but isn't stated anywhere else, so I missed it.  My bad! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yuri
Talk:Best Day (disambiguation)

message: Seems to me that with Graham Colton's single "Best Days" getting a lot of airplay (iTunes single of the week, Leno, American Idol song, etc.) that this needs a disambiguation page--or at least a reference to the Colton song. Smontg2 (talk) 04:43, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mansfield News Journal

message: Infobox is missing info.  Needs front page, cost of copy of paper, etc.  The article is missing any mention of its political and editorial policies/stance.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox etc.

message: There was also this earlier Mansfield News publication documented at LoC here with a start date of 1882 and George H. Winters as publisher. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Mansfield News
Talk:Association of Registered Graphic Designers

message: You may want to use the heading tags and remove much of the copypaste from the page. Just a quick tip! Spryde 19:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading Tags

message: Greetings,
You may want to try to make this a factual article about the organization or others may come to delete it. It really reads like an advertisement and as such will be removed. Make sure you cite your sources about this .org Spryde 19:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert

message: Thanks, there are few others contributing based on an initial document. We will formalize the tone to comply with Wikipedia's standards Gerard Dolan 20:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Mother Earth (journal)

message: The intro to this article does not in anyway explain what the Mother Earth Journal is in anyway. Someone familiar with the publication should update it to explain just what subject of the journal was. Is this some sort of anarchist publication?
--Cab88 (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

message: This article should be merged with Mother Earth (magazine), preferably at that title ("journal" is generally reserved for academic journals). Apparently there were two different articles with the name Mother Earth, but I see no reason why there could not be one article covering both. --Crusio (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There certainly is a degree of overlap; I've placed merge tags on the articles and will inform the anarchism task force.  Skomorokh, barbarian  18:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Disagree The two publications are from different time periods and were controlled by different people. From what I see there was no actual continuity between the two. The subject matter was similar and some of the articles in the later publication were reprints from the first series. That's about it.--TGC55 (talk) 14:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Disagree along with TGC55. Two different magazines. The similarity of names may be because the second magazine hope to profit from the audience of the first. There's no *scholarly* reason to confuse the two, unless there's an expert to demonstrate that the second emerged from the first ... and can merge the two without throwing away any valuable contributions. E.g., you wouldn't merge "Amazing" and "Astounding" (both SF, very similar names, similar audiences ... but no).Twang (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

text: *That "(t)he subject matter was similar and some of the articles in the later publication were reprints from the first series" sounds rather like continuity to me, I must say... --Crusio (talk) 15:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with the merge proposal. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 05:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other article
Talk:List of members of the Hellenic Parliament, 2007–2009

message: The work you are doing here is fabulous. But I noticed that by having two lists all the names are repeated. I think it's better to create a big table with the 300 names and on the second column the party and on the third the region. The table can be sortable so anyone can choose the way the wants to check the list. Moreover, this is better in the case someone of the persons listed is declared as independent in the future or we want to add some comments next to his name for example "he entered the parliament on xx/xx/200x in replacement of xxxx who died", etc.
In addition, please consider the fact that some names may not a link, at least for the short future. -- Magioladitis 14:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Had thought about doing that, but have never worked with those sortable tables. Will look into it.--Damac 14:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not so difficult in fact. Check here for an example. -- Magioladitis 14:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it would be best to fill the main table first, then convert it. That way we can be sure that we get the numbers right.--Damac 14:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated list
Talk:Journal of Biological Sciences

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Camajuaní

message: Camajuani is not a port city, Caibarien is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lezumbalaberenjena (talk • contribs) 20:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Phonology (journal)

message: For whatever reason the citation system records that all these papers were published in 2008. As a look at the journal website can tell you, none of them were to my knowledge. I don't know how to fix this. Kylebgorman (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the issue needs to be taken up at Template talk:Cite doi. Angr (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: All papers dated 2008
Talk:Plant Physiology (journal)

message: the users of university's webpages are not all the SEO experts
http://illinois.edu/ds/search?search=Donald+Ort&search_type=staff&skinId=2240
http://illinois.edu/ds/search?search=Donald+R.+Ort&search_type=staff&skinId=2240
If an initial of a person's middle name is unable to WYSIWYG, why do not those websites initiate user guided searches or put search help guidelines along side, such as the following
http://www.amazon.com/Advanced-Search-Books/b/ref=sv_b_0?ie=UTF8&node=241582011
???
--222.64.23.236 (talk) 23:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just beare in mind that....
Category talk:Transcendental Meditation

message: What is the criteria for inclusion in this list?  The topic Natural Stress Relief for example mentions TM only one time and is not substantiated by any source. Should that be on the list?  Also, there are many celebrities who openly practice TM and it is mentioned in there Wiki article and supported with secondary sources.  Should those articles be listed here also?  I think we need a clear criteria for inclusion if we want to have a reliable list.-- — Kbob • Talk •  20:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: People who notably practice TM are included in a subcategory: :category:Transcendental Meditation practitioners. Discussions of whether individual articles belong in a category are usually held on the article talk page.   Will Beback  talk   22:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I will address NSR on its talk page. Meantime I would like to discuss the organization of the TMM category as a whole. For example the  :category:Transcendental Meditation practitioners sub category seems quite arbitrary and impractical to me.  Can we discuss that here? -- — Kbob • Talk •  22:06, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, what's the issue with the practitioners category?   Will Beback  talk   22:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its an arbitrary category that mixes the founder of TM, some TM's prominent leaders and celebrities all in the same basket. I think we should differentiate a little bit.-- — Kbob • Talk •  18:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how it's arbitrary. It concerns one fact about the categorized people: whether or not they have notably practiced TM. Many categories on Wikipedia contain both celebrities and non-celebrities, and that's OK. There's no velvet rope to separate them. How would you suggest differentiating them?   Will Beback  talk   20:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for Inclusion
Talk:Side by Side (Duke Ellington and Johnny Hodges album)

message: As with many albums in the Duke Ellington catalog, All Music is confused about the placement of this in the Ellington discography. Currently, it is listed there as a 1958 album, notwithstanding that half of the tracks were recorded in February of 1959. Since Ellington released multiple albums each year, I can't tell which albums should properly be the "previous" and "next". --Moonriddengirl 20:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of publication
Talk:Catharina Hooft

message: The Dutch wikipedia on her husband was not reliable, although I worked on it myself. I think both look better now, but I will double check as soon as possible in the archives. Taksen 19:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:You're Gonna Make Me Lonesome When You Go

message: I removed two sub-sections on Miley Cyrus's Chimes of Freedom cover and added some of the deleted material to the opening section. Details on the video, what Cyrus wore on television and the like had no place in the article (WP:Notability), the purpose of which is to foster a better understanding of Bob Dylan's song. To the editor who added the sections in question, please seek discussion before restoring it. Allreet (talk) 08:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miley Cyrus cover
Talk:List of moment of inertia tensors

message: Is it really necessary to have this column, since there's nothing in it? 82.12.107.202 09:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the column because I felt that is was not needed and this talk page seems to confirm that because no reply was made to the above question. --82.157.88.115 (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments Column
Talk:The American Journal of the Medical Sciences

message: * "Full View" google books John Vandenberg 06:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The interesting question here is why such a long-established journal has failed to compete with other American general medical journals, though it will obviously be hard to get published material on this. Espresso Addict 14:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Low impact

message: I have linked all mention of the journal, so Special:Whatlinkshere/The American Journal of the Medical Sciences gives clues of what may be interesting to expand on further; below is one I havent been able to put my hands on.  John Vandenberg 08:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  interesting articles
Talk:Brooklandville, Maryland

message: I'm sorry but Marty Bass is not famous enough to warrant an entire section devoted to him.
71.206.38.71 (talk) 04:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Residents 