lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tenneco

message: This Tenneco The Same Tenneco?
Around 1980, there was a convenience store/gas station chain named Tenneco.  Is this the same company?
Shawn D. 12:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. The company was diversified company and had a number of subsidiaries beside of Tenneco Automotive. Tenneco was involved e.g. in pulp and paper chemicals; oil exploration, production, processing and marketing; and life insurance. This article needs expansion and rewriting to include history and other activities of the company Beagel (talk) 08:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hello,  The Tenneco logo was changed effective November 2022 with the acquisition of Apollo when Tenneco became a privately owned corporation.
https://www.tenneco.com/ PTEngine (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  logo change
Talk:Canuck letter

message: Good piece of history 159.105.80.141 12:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't understand: how is the letter related to the speech, and why would he be so upset about it? All it says about the letter is that he calls French-Canadians "Canucks" (I admit that I don't see why that's a big deal when Canada built a fighter jet they themselves named the CF-100 Canuck...you don't see America building the F-19 Niggerjet, do you?), and then he's crying publicly/furious because they had insulted his wife. Where does his wife come into the picture? It would be nice if it gave a little context. Presumably the letter said more than the article covers. AnnaGoFast (talk) 05:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: I've attempted to undo this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Canuck_letter&oldid=742454116 . The sources used to justify the changes are questionable at best.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AConcernedReader 2343243 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert questionably sourced edits 

message: The half-paragraph "The CBS Evening News showed Muskie's face contorted with emotion. Muskie maintained that if his voice cracked, it cracked from anger; Muskie's antagonist was the same editor who referred to him in the 1968 election as "Moscow Muskie", and called him a flip-flopper. The tears, Muskie claimed, were actually snow melting on his face. Jim Naughton of The New York Times, standing immediately at Muskie's feet, could not confirm that Muskie cried." references several disparate pieces of information and attributes none of them. Who put this here? Where is this coming from? Can we fix this? 100.16.61.174 (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glaring Lack of Sources 

message: I removed a claim in the opening sentence that the Canuck letter was a "forged letter" − while the story was forged, the wording here implied that the letter was also forged.
Sending a letter using a pseudonym is just as much a "forgery" as the letter here was. I am not excusing what happened, just ensuring that the depiction of the event is truthful. Owen214 (talk) 04:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgery
Talk:Claughton, Wyre

message: I have removed the following:
: The current civil parish is called 'Brock' and now encompasses the former parish of Myerscough (pronounced Myersco and not as if it is some sort of chest infection e.g. Myerscoff). The modern parish is the home of Myerscough College. However, this article will concentrate on the ancient parish of Claughton on Brock.
This actually refers to Brock ward; there is no Brock parish. --Dr Greg 12:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brock ward 
Talk:Mormon Doctrine (book)

message: I understand that there is a lot that ought to be brought from the Bruce R. McConkie article. The references should all come along with any article text which will be transplanted. Also, I realize the title of the article is a tad bit cumbersome, but I think it is the best way to be specific here. Isaac Crumm 12:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 15 May 2007

message: The statement of McConkie's theology around the African race and the Priesthood appears misleading. McConkie's statements about actions in a pre-existence influencing race and the Curse of Cain being dark skin remain in the 1978 edition as can be verified via archive.org.
https://archive.org/details/mormondoctrine0000mcco/page/114/mode/1up?q=%22Pre-existence%22&view=theater 67.171.252.161 (talk) 01:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading statement on McConkie's theology being removed
Talk:Desperados

message: I got to this page from the Desperado disambig page. Does there really need to be a separate one for the plural? The comic book and the roller coaster are both referenced on the singular page. Joliefille 03:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points - I'd suggest starting the merge process. (Emperor 03:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Canon de 155 mm GPF

message: We could REALLY use a picture for this article. --MKnight9989 12:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Japan should probably be included as one of the users of the 155mm GPF, because it used some GPFs that it had captured against American forces returning to the Philippines during World War II.  Additionally, it is reported that Finland also used the GPF, and that Polish troops in Italy were other users of this artillery piece.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.93.54.202 (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional users added, also list of surviving guns, mostly from www.cdsg.org . RobDuch (talk) 02:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used by 

message: Look for  "The Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC)" posted to Youtube by Motion Vault.  There is footage of GPFs at 6:52 to 6:59, probably in a Latin American country.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.83.22.172 (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footage
Talk:James VI and I and the English Parliament

message: I was under the impression that Guido Fawkes was British, despite having a Dutch name. He was a Yorkshireman, who fought as a sapper with the Spanish army.
ALCUS36 10:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right, of course. Good catch. I've changed it. qp10qp 14:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guy Fawkes? 

message: Ok, I read your whole article, and I think that it would bring more clarity if it was done parliament by parliament, and you could discuss the main issues of each (Finance, Union, Religion, Privileges etc.) therein.
1st parliament would be the longest, but in this strucutr you would be able to include much as yet undiscussed material. Prerogatives, and the judge Fleming statement (which was to do with parliament), Impositions, and the whle range of privelege arguments. This would have helped me in my A-Levels, so I would say that it's useful and worthwile.
ALCUS36 10:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are entirely right. This article, which hasn't existed very long, is not so much a full treatment as a heap of stray material shoved in a pile to await further attention. It is largely material removed from the James I of England article when that got too large. It's on my list of things to do, and I would also like to do an article on the Scottish parliaments under James, a neglected topic. Even so, I think this article could still be helpful to an A Level student because there are some good quotes to be found in it (especially in the notes) and it is sourced to some of the best historians. Would you consider having a go at improving the article yourself, after you've finished your A Levels? qp10qp 14:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: Should we move this to "James I and the English Parliament", since it's a bit obvious which James I this would refer to? PatGallacher (talk) 17:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I called it that because I assumed it should ape the biography page as much as possible, to come up with it in the search. qp10qp (talk) 22:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm not aware that this is a factor in the titling of articles. PatGallacher (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences

message: I've edited out some redundancy and tone issues, but there are still some issues - the comma-separated listing out of department names without context, the big list of criticisms/controversies - which I'm not sure what the Wiki way of fixing is. 
SundaraRaman  (talk) 15:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MoS tag 

message: The section should be removed, as it contains mostly news bites and general media coverage. NIMHANS being an apex institute of mental health in the country, it makes such news EVERY single day!http://www.ndtv.com/topic/nimhanshttp://www.nimhans.ac.in/who-collaborating-centre-injury-prevention-and-safety-promotion/news-mediahttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Nimhans 14.139.159.99 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:15, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy and criticism
Talk:Bowling average

message: Concerned that this page is heavily slighted toward cricket only. Would make sense to have a disambiguation or a section for 10-pin bowling Psycadelc (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns

message: The text states that "George Lohmann holds the record for the lowest average in Test cricket". However, the table entitled "Completed Test career bowling averages" shows two players with lower averages. Further, the "Test Cricket" section states that, among others, ESPNcricinfo cites him as holding the lowest bowling average. But the source of the aforementioned table is stated as "cricinfo" and the current table at the link shows Lohmann in fourth place. So there seem to be multiple contradictions going on here. -- Hux (talk) 05:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused about who's the no. 1 

message: Scott Boland has now bowled more than 600 balls in Test cricket and has a lower bowling average than George Lohmann. Hence the text under the photo of Lohmann is not accurate at this point in time. It may be accurate again if Boland's average deteriorates in the future or if a higher number of balls than Boland has bowled is used to set the standard. 120.21.124.212 (talk) 11:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowest Test Cricket Bowling average
Talk:Psalms 152–155

message: I removed the link to cantusquercus.com. The Psalms on that page do not appear to be the Syriac ones this page is about, but other Psalms from the Dead Sea Scrolls.
One must be careful when researching this topic on the Internet — many contemporary people have felt the urge to write Psalms, and give them numbers like 151, 152, etc. But those numbered Pslams do not match the ancient Greek/Syriac Psalms so numbered. SJK (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: And I removed the link Psalm 151-155: 2013 Critical Translation with Audio Drama at biblicalaudio. Their so-called "critical text" has 5 extra psalms (Psalms 151–160), and despite being labelled a "critical text" doesn't provide any sources; and even for Psalms 151–155, the text seems to be elaborated. I get the impression this is just another case of contemporary people writing their own psalms. It doesn't provide anything of value for someone researching the history of these texts. SJK (talk) 09:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of link to biblicalaudio.com
Talk:Visual Mind

message: This page should not be deleted because we are just making it. On-topic information will be added shortly.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Visualmind (talk • contribs) 213:07, 15 May 2007
:If the "we" referenced is "Mind technologies" or otherwise the creators of the product you plan to write about (as your username seem to indicate), I would suggest it is a conflict of interest (see WP:CoI) for you to create the article, and that you should let it be speedilly deleted, and let someone unaffiliated with you recreate the article when/if your product is notable (see WP:NOTE). W 13:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pharisee and the Publican

message: Please don't change the version of the scripture text and especially not to KJV again. NIV is a popular modern English translation that's approved by most mainline Protestant denominations and the Catholic church. It's easier to understand for those not familiar with the subject which falls inline with the purpose of Wikipedia. The reference links to a site that offers around 50 different translations including KJV. CJ 13:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we not also change the name of the page to 'Pharisee and Tax Collector'? The term 'publican' is only used in the KJV, and it means the owner of a pub (public house) in contemporary English, though, even then, it is near obsolete. Martin Turner (talk) 12:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible version 

message: Can we please lose the two embarrassingly bad illustrations, which add nothing to the article?
PhilG (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure! -- Radagast3 (talk) 08:12, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced them by two better ones. -- Radagast3 (talk) 03:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations 

message: Shouldn't this at the very least explain what this story is about?
--OxAO (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humility 

message: The commentary section seems to have someone's own personal commentary added into it which disparages the other two which were cited. Team tyn (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary
Talk:Yorkshire Wolds

message: Most books, and some websites, seem to sub divide the area into North-east, North-west, central (or Capital) and South.Would it be OK to divide the villages and towns into groups for these areas? It would make it easier to understand.--Ahjet (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean. Settlements is a bit unweildy as a section.--Harkey Lodger (talk) 12:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Areas 

message: The ancient seat of the JACKSON family in The Yorkshire Wolds was at a place called Kelswold Grove, or Killingswold Grove. Ralph Jackson (1495-1556), his son Richard (1505-1555) and Richard's wife, Ann Todd, flourished there. Richard was the grandfather of Richard Jackson II who married Ursula Hildyard in 1596. (She was a direct descendant of William the Conqueror and the Norman and Plantagenet Kings up to Edward I.) One of their sons was Sir Anthony Jackson II, who was in the service of Charles I and Charles II.
was added. Please quote sources for their WP:Notability--Harkey Lodger (talk) 12:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacksons ? 
Talk:Posalia

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 08:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Mount Rennie rape case

message: I have added a POV tag to this article on account of the confusing purpose of the "Public reaction" section. It is not clear why the reference to "British oppression" is included . (Yes, I know it is sourced, but why is it included when hundreds of other details from contemporary reports are omitted?). At present it just looks like opportunistic Brit-bashing. Postlebury (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag

message: I find it hard to believe that Clunes compared the Rennie incident to the "gang rapes of 2000" as he was writing in 1957!
I'm also a bit concerned about the claim tha Hicks was "educated in a convent and only recently moved to Syndey." I've looked at a number of books and articles by reputable historians and I haven't noticed thi detail in any of them. I wonder if te inclusion of this line is intended to cast aside any possible doubts about Hick's character. Don't get me wrong, I don't beleive for a second that a woman would invite a rape, nor that previous "character" has any bearing on a rape case. However, there were contemporary disputes about Hick's character. For instance, a policeman stated in the "Australian Star" on the 30th July 1895 that Hicks was a prostitute (no, not only the Bulletin, the Star cited in Peers, Juliet. "The Tribe of Mary Jane Hicks: Imaging Women through the Mount Rennie Rape Case 1886." Australian Cultural History 12 (1993): 127 - 44.) I think I'll put a citation needed on that line and give it a few weeks before deleting. The fact that Hicks went to a convent school and had recently moved to Sydney is not really relevant, either way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Earl (talk • contribs) 09:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: A request for a reference about Hick's educational status can be easily filled in from sources of the period and what better than to use a first person statement from the girl herself. I am not using my wikipedia user name - I know the primary sources around the event extremely well - because I do wonder at some of the nit picking and masculinist viewpoints that have appeared on this talk page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.170.90.4 (talk) 07:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the reference requested  
Talk:Comparability

message: I have restricted the definition to partial orders. In the previous version there was inconsistency about the question whether an element is comparable to itself. According to  it is. Can the definition be extended? In a preorder, are p and q with pRq and qRp called comparable?--Patrick 13:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Since a partial order P is, a fortiori, a relation (mathematics), elements x and y are comparable with respect to P if and only if \{(x,y), (y,x)\} \cap P is nonempty.  And the difference between non-strict and strict versions of a partial order is precisely that one is the reflexive closure (resp. reflexive reduction) of the other.  So any element x is comparable to itself with respect to P if and only if P is reflexive (non-strict).—PaulTanenbaum 01:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-comparability 

message: Is there a somewhat authoritative source or tradition for the notation \perp and \parallel for comparable and incomparable? It would be good to have a reference or else to say that the notation is not standard. It seems that almost always people just use the words and do not introduce symbols for the two concepts. Bjbraams (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation 

message: Prev version labeled ⊥ as "perpendicular" and || as "parallel." I don't see that those labels provided any clarity or aided anyone's understanding, but I do imagine that they might have confused novice readers. That's why I undid the addition of those labels. If somebody thinks that there's a good reason to restore the labels, please let us know here what that reason is.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why my delete
Talk:2007 J.League Cup

message: If anyone is curious why there is a test image, refer here. Addhoc 13:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:System (disambiguation)

message: There are at least more then 100 articles starting with system, see below (source List of systems. Now I don't think all of them should be listed in this disambiguation page. The question however is, which of them could, should, or shouldn't..!? - Mdd 21:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A lot of systems in Wikipedia 

message: * The Mac OS operating system removed. There are thousands of these articles, see List of systems. - Mdd 22:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Items removed
Talk:Santo Domingo Province

message: The province Matias Ramon Mella do NOT exist. Even with congressional aproval, the president returned the project. Please remove links with the province, and maps.
Oscar987 03:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Matias Ramon Mella Province

message: Population of Santo Domingo province have to be corrected because of the Matias Ramon Mella do not exist. Oscar987 05:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:List of New Testament minuscules (1–1000)

message: Aland informed that minuscule 2803 is housed in Dimitriou monastery 53 in Mount Athos (Aland K. Aland B., The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Text Criticism, transl. E.F. Rhodes, Grand Rapids, Michigan 1995 (3th ed.), p. 138), but there is no monastery at such name among 20 monasteries of Athos. Is it one of the small monasteries? Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 19:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is one of the small monasteries in Athos. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 14:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dimitriou monastery]] 

message: What "†" mean in tables ? 87.199.9.40 (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the same question. There is no explanation in the text for the † symbol. It doesn't relate to either a footnote nor to the relevance of the wiki linked text. I suggest that they are removed from the text JMH johnmark†(talk to me) 21:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What "†" mean in tables ? 

message: How would people feel about merging the three List of NT Minuscules pages into one? It would be easier to search for things in the page if they were all one one page. 𝐨𝐱𝐲𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐧𝐵𝑈𝑇𝐴𝑍𝑂𝑁𝐸 ⓊⓉ 11:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge
Talk:Future Comics

message: I'm coming across the problem of multiple comics series with the same title or the same title as a later publisher a few times as I'm adding details for some Golden/Silver Age comics that don't currently have Wikipedia pages.
David McKay Publishing released a (short-running) Future Comics title in 1940, no relation to Future Comics the publishers. As far as I can see, technically, convention dictates that page should be under 'Future Comics', while this page should be 'Future Comics (publishers)' - at least that's the convention already used for McKay's 'Ace Comics' and the seperate 'Ace Comics (publishers)' among others.
The alternative would appear be an ungainly 'Future Comics (David McKay Publishers)' title instead, which doesn't look good. And this page should, for accuracy, be '(publishers) anyway.  
I'll leave it for comment for 2 weeks, after which I'll instigate the change if there's no dissent.
Archiveangel (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested change of page name to Future Comics (publishers)

message: I have added the cleanup tag for this article, as the wording throughout the entire article is editorial, reading more like a newspaper article than an encyclopedia. It's more than I can correct without rewriting the article from the ground up.Justin.Parallax (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement tag