lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:O'Connell Center

message: Can anyone provide info on why the O'Connell Center and the Sun Dome are virtually the same building and were built at the same time?
:Done. Better late than never, imo. :-) Zeng8r (talk) 00:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to the USF Sun Dome 

message: I have removed the section about famous Gator basketball players because i don't think it really needs to be in the article about the stadium. It rather could be included in the Gator basketball article. There are more then just basketball played at the O'Connell Center. Hatmatbbat10Talk to me 20:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed famous gator section

message: Has there been a previous discussion regarding moving this article to one reflecting the full name of the facility? StrikerforceTalk  14:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:COMMONNAME, the current title is fine. "Exactech Arena at the Stephen C. O'Connell Center" is not the most commonly used name, and it's quite a mouthful (keyboardful?). Also, if we're being technical, that's only the name of the main arena in the middle, not the natatorium and other facilities n there as well. The full name is mentioned in boldface in the introduction, which does the job, imo. Zeng8r (talk) 23:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper name for this article?
Talk:WRUF (AM)

message: I have created a separate page for WRUF-FM, and have migrated all of the relevant data for the FM station over there. I went through and fixed some of the info on this page, which does not appear to have been updated for quite a while. Horologium talk - contrib 00:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: * Discuss the history & leadership over the years. Jccort (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the Article 

message: * Talk about the famous alumni as well. Jccort (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Alumni
Talk:WUFT (TV)

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: * Discuss the history & leadership over the years. Jccort (talk) 21:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the Article 

message: * Talk about the famous alumni over the years as well. Jccort (talk) 21:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Alumni
Talk:ABC Radio Sydney

message: AUSTRALIAN RADIO: The Technical Story 1923-1983 by Winston Muscio, , gives the original name as "Sydney Broadcasters", later changed to "Broadcasters Limited".  What is the origin for the "Broadcasting" names in the article?
--PeterJeremy 11:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: No mention is made in this article of 702 ABC Sydney's use of digital radio as a broadcast method, it only states they broadcast at 702 kHz on the AM band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.1.41 (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast Channels
Talk:Cardiac marker

message: I accidentally identified a very nice historical reference on myocardial markers. JFW | T@lk 00:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical article 

message: In planned MI due to alcohol septal ablation in HOCM, they have found a bunch of potential new markers. Watch this space:  JFW | T@lk 23:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burn myocardium, get markers 

message: "...or HIV. this usually back to normal 10–14 days." 
Either something is missing or should be "This usually returns back to normal within 10-14 days" .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.213.48 (talk) 05:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: LDH

message: Are those values given really peak measurements or when the raised levels can be detected after an event? (I know troponin peaks at 3 days, and lasts till day 7, but I am not sure about the rest) Anyone who have passed their medical exams unlike me?
Eugeneltc (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage of 'peak' in the table?
Talk:Esher (Myst)

message: I don't know why this article is a stub. Could it be explained why? Also note that there is limited information on the character to date. Hobo 11:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ancient Greek phonology/Thrax's responses to RFC comments

message: One editor, User:Thrax wants to include in this article the hypothesis that the pronunciation of Ancient Greek was very similar to that of Modern Greek, whereas all other editors have the opinion that this is a marginal view and should only be mentioned in one sentence. Andreas 03:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The other editors are not professional linguists and are out of their depth. The reconstructed pronunciation is no longer valid in the field of modern linguists and its claims and dates of alleged sound changes and the nature of the alleged changes themselves can not be scientifically justified. There is overwhelming evidence from the inscriptional record and comparisons with the evolution of Semitic languages that proves that all of the elements necessary for modern Greek pronunciation were intrinsic to the Phoenician based script the ancient Greeks adopted from the time the script was devised since all of the symbols representing plosives were also allophones for fricatives in proto-Semitic by necessity. Comparisons with Latin along with biblical Hebrew show that there is no evidence at all to suggest that the dasea in ancient Greek were anything but fricatives, and the account of Dionysios Thrax makes no since at al unless the mediae were fricatives. Thefore the evidence reconstructed pronunciation is wither non-existent or inconclusive. With no conclusive evidence it is fraudulent to claim that so-and-so is how Attic Greek was pronounced. The reconstructed pronunciation is not a valid scientific theory but nothing more than an out of date convention and Wikipedia must label it and all of its claims as such and state the places of contention and the lack of evidence. --Thrax 15:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of previous discussions
Talk:Alfa Romeo GTA

message: I feel we need to split up the information on the GTA and GTAm. While there isn't enough information to justify a new page, there probably should be one section for GTA and GTA Junior and a seperate section for the GTAm.
--Xagent86 11:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  GTA and GTAm 

message: Surely the engine section containing discussion of the 147 GTA is completely wrong, this not being a page on the 147?
: I agree. The  147 GTA engine specifications do not belong here. Otherwise why not also add the  156 GTA and every other modern Alfa Romeo, where the GTA badge has been used to designate the top performance model... such as the Alfa Romeo 159 where there are plans for a GTA variant. --Xagent86 01:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have now removed 147 GTA engine section from the article as it didnt belong there. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 21:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GTA? 

message: I question the listed weight of the 1600 GTA of 1800 lbs. I owned a 1966 that I weighed on an accurate truck scale and it weighed 1830 lbs with fuel, water and oil and with me in it. In those days I weighed 160 which would put the weight closer to 1670 lbs wet. I have seen the dry weight listed as 1640 lbs which seem in line with what I found. The body of the car stripped of all running gear and other parts could be easily picked up by two people and set on top of another car (personal experience)
Rv8pilot (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no info if this is dry or wet weight. --Typ932 T·C 06:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight of Alfa GTA 1600 

message: This section needs to be rewritten with proper source somehow, in Wikipedia we cant use forums as sources:
"There are some doubts whether the Brazilian cars were actually 2000cc, as both Zambello and Fernandez are reported to have won events in 1969 with a GTA1900 which is a different engine (1840cc), though it can not be ruled out that their car was upgraded to 2000cc for 1970. Regardless, given the dates of the events in Brazil, the Angolan and Brazilian cars are different (this text is a modified quote by "Alleggerita" in http://www.alfabb.com/bb/forums/giulia-gta-gta-1300-jr-gtam-1965-1975/73828-gta-2000-a.html#post535097)."   -->Typ932 T·C 17:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  GTA 1900 and GTA 2000
Template talk:Admin backlog

message: This template is protected, and should be tagged with , or another suitable protection template. Thanks – Qxz 19:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:37, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit 

message: Saturation2 Talk to me, or you can at my edits. Sign here if you love me. 01:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No requested edit is apparent; resolving tag. CMummert · talk 02:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editprotected 

message: Place the following template wrapped in noinclude tags onto the page. 
 Funpika 18:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Also, please ask nicely when make requests. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

text: As there is no activity on this, I'm killing the merge tag. — xaosflux Talk 13:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add proposed merge tag 

message: Please replace the first line of this template with the following: <includeonly>. Thanks. —Ms2ger (talk) 12:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . Mr.Z-man 22:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mbox 

message: How come Template:Admin backlog is semi-protected but Template:No admin backlog is permanently protected? George8211what did I break now? 15:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Perhaps we should add an optional parameter such as  for that extra bit of emphasis when an important admin backlog requires urgent attention. Just a thought.. -- œ™ 03:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "...backlog that <u>'''desperately'''</u> requires  the attention..."

message: I suggest that "Please change this notice to  when the backlog is cleared." is not included on pages where this template is managed by a bot. --Laber□T 00:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove second paragraph if maintained by bot
Talk:Virginia-class submarine

message: Why was the ships in class section changed so drastically? It’s much more messy now and dosent show the block groupings
The old layout was simpler to read and easier differentiate the ship blocks Northstar2770 (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It does "show the block groupings"... look at the third column.The old layout has issues and is being changed across the project. - wolf 02:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Ships in class section is now different compared to before 

message: The first two paragraphs of the article read like they're straight out of a General Dynamics sales brochure. Any objections to editing that to make it more descriptive? NordicRest (talk) 03:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to WP:FIXIT. - wolf 17:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete lack of objectivity in outline 

message: Reading the section that lists the cost of the Virginia class it look like it costs $2.8B. But in the text it states the cost is below $1.8B.
I agree this article needs some serious review. Bruce A. WIlliamson (talk) 13:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The $2.8B is 2019 dollars, while the $1.8B is from 2009. - wolf 15:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The costs seem wrong they're not consistent
Talk:Life's a Riot with Spy vs Spy

message: Why no mention of the MAD Magazine cartoon Spy vs. Spy? Gohst 12:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:National Space Centre

message: "The National Space Centre is the UK's only visitor attraction devoted to space science and astronomy." London Planetarium is no longer in the UK, then? Grutness...wha? 12:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious opening line

message: I have removed most of the material that seems to be cut from brochures and tourism websites.  Can we remove the  banner from the top now?  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 23:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, that's a lot better than it was. TheIslander 11:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert banner

message: The tower's height is 42 metres. I think it belongs on the Main Page but I need other facts on this. The text may need to be edited into a different form of sentance, but not deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Emtage (talk • contribs) 16:41, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Building Height
Talk:Mathers table

message: This is hopefully the first of several articles on Hermetic Kabbalah.  There seems to be some dissatisfaction in some of the main Kabbalah articles because they do not stay within the scope Jewish mysticism.  I understand where some folks might be coming from so this is my attempt at keeping the peace while still covering a valid area of knowledge. <Puck Puck 12:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a mystery to me!  The only change I did was the shin; I have no idea how the other changes got there!  I'll try to revert them carefully. Owen× ☎ 01:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No biggie, it is a G-d awful mess. <Puck 01:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I figured out the mystery. Apparently, I used this older version as the baseline for my changes, for some reason. (And I was only on my second beer!) Owen× ☎ 01:43, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: I'm not satisfied with the Book reference template.  I may end up doing them manually. <Puck 12:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book reference template 

message: Not meaning to be picky or anything :) but the title of this page really should be "Mathers' Table" not "Mathers table". I don't know how to rename a page so I will leave this for someone else...
Morgan Leigh | Talk 01:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think the title is OK.  The person who created the table was named Mathers.  If he had been named Smith and it were called the Smith table or if I had titled it the Hebrew table I don't think the issue would have come up. --◀Pucktalk▶ 01:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title
Talk:Dakshin Dinajpur district

message: In english wikipedia 'dakshin' should be changed to 'south'.--Iball 15:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to south Dinajpur 
Talk:Kolkata district

message: It doesn't make sense that one district would contain parts of two others. Is that section trying to say that parts of calcutta city are in those other two districts?
:No that doesn't make sense, see Kolkata#Urban_structure. Jeroenvrp 15:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the Kolkata district co-terminous with the city of Kolata under the authority of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation? If so, this should be noted in the three articles. -- Beland (talk) 08:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with city 

message: Please rectify linguistic demographic data of Kolkata district.  Till now Bengali people form majority in Kolkata and Bengali still official language of Kolkata. Hindi and Urdu is additional language. 202.142.78.196 (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linguistic data
Talk:Purba Medinipur district

message: It has also major national highways named NH116B (Nandakumar- Chandaneswar sea coast express way).  Ananda6233 (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major highways
Talk:Nadia district

message: Jayanta 04:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some News and some hopes .. 

message: Rapping and direct cut. 2601:780:4300:5A10:DDB9:BCF1:7ED6:DACC (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studio
Talk:Washington Old Hall

message: George Washington's ancestral home was Sulgrave Manor, in Sulgrave, Northamptonshire. He had no connection with the town of Washington. Grutness...wha? 12:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot 

message: An IP has suggested that Tyne and Wear no longer exists as a geographic entity. The UK Government thinks otherwise. See here and here and here. Dormskirk (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: County
Talk:Ajmer district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Alwar district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://archive.org/stream/dli.csl.2940/2940_djvu.txt. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — SamX [talk · contribs] 06:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Banswara district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:John Kemble (martyr)

message: Do I detect just a hint of POV in this? (Anon.)
:My jaw was dropping from the career title in the first word. Is the "image" just the barest bit inflated? Not all that informative as illustrations go... A bit cheeky. --Wetman 13:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I put it on WP:DYK in order to draw attention of other editors to this weird entry. --Ghirla | talk 14:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The line 'The famous Kemble family are direct descendants of John Kemble,' is curious since he's reported as a priest who never married or had children. Direct descension implies he had children who had children, etc. If he did have children, why isn't this reported in the article? If not, the wording needs to be changed to say that he is simply related (if he is in fact related) to the family. Unfortunately the linked article on the Kemble family doesn't mention the priest John Kemble or the relation...
: My thought too... William Avery 19:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "direct descendants" 

message: Should that be Roman Catholic priest, or is there no other sort? William Avery 19:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "guilty of the treasonous crime of being a priest" 
Talk:Barmer district

message: chohtan population
sex ratio
total voters  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.0.201.97 (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  politics 

message: Barmer is a very important army base for India. This must be included in this which is important from all aspects.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.224.38 (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army Base 

message: Jains are in majority in the city of Barmer. This must be added in Religion and Culture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crickethitesh (talk • contribs) 05:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religions 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: In last decade , promegrante are widely grown in south-western part of rajasthan .
.
In 2010 , promegrante practised from a village near Balotra city name , Budiwada .
After 3-5 year , promegrante farming are widely spready in barmer distrist and then in nearby district jalore , sirohi , jodhpur , .....etc .
. 2405:201:5C03:801A:19F2:D626:212E:8757 (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promegrante