Talk:Lelouch Lamperouge

message: I know you really probably don't want to hear this, but I have facts and proff that show that Lelouch is still alive and I think you could add it to the article.
First, upon Lelouch's death, he transferred his memories of his plan to Nunnaly, Just as C.C has given her memories to Lelouch. Also let it be known that C.C also had to die once for her true immortality to begin, thus the picture of her laying on the floor of the Chapel bleeding all over the place.
Second, Lelouch has killed his father, so technically that should give him his fathers code, as Charels gained his code by killing V.V.
Third, C.C always felt that death would have been better then eternal life. In the altar when she was praying, she commented that Lelouch was making the "Ultimate Sacrifice" Now, knowing C.C, I think she would mean never being able to pass on, since that was even her wish.
And Fourth, It would be contridictory for C.C to deny that having the power of the king leads to a life of lonliness, if he, or she, were in fact, alone. With that said, I believe that Lelouch is alive somewhere, or, in fact, could have been the one driving the wagon.
Please consider these things.. I just want it to be put out there that there is even the smallest possibility of Lelouch's survival.
--Akumi Katsuya (talk) 23:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In a word, no. That's original research and it will not be added. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 17:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lelouch's death 

message: Seriously, stop the damn textwalls and drop the ridiculous fight. This isn't a forum to discuss if Lelouch died, nor is it the place to try to disprove that notion. Every source says he's dead. That is fact. Nothing else will be reported and the quite unnecessary amount of drama here isn't going to change the fact. The "(?)" in the Animage quote is not part of the original quote. The parentheses indicate that the text inside the parenthesis comes from the writer's own mouth. Therefore, there is no uncertainty. Also, stop trying to pin happy or tragic or anything like that to the interpretation. It comes across as opinion. That it's open to interpretation is enough. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 01:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So that problem is resolved, but the problem still exists that the context of those particular statements was lost in translation, and wording it the way it is now is misleading. (Not to mention repetitive, because it's the exact same thing Okouchi said.) It wasn't lost in translation from Jap to Eng so much as it was from Writer/ Director to fanbase. No, it shouldn't have been lost, but unfortunately what would have been the simple obvious meaning of the statement has been largely obscured by an over popularization of fan theory. Thus in order for it not to automatically denote something that isn't canon, it must be clarified. The events of the ending are not open to interpretation; whether it was 'happy' or  'sad' in the fans' eyes is. And yes, 'happy' and 'sad' are Okouchi's exact words. If you don't like my wording certainly feel free to re-word it more cohesively, but I cannot accept it as it is now as it is misleading. Zero Requiem (talk) 01:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of the ending

message: Could the quote from the director about the viewers' interpretations of the ending possibly be added to the article? - Pokemega32 (talk) 03:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already there. I thought this discussion was over. Why are we still talking about this? Anyone else want to bring more repeat complaints to the table? Zero Requiem (talk) 01:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Original Quote

message: DOES LELOUCH LAMPEROUGE HAVE A MIDDLE NAME?--0000ZERO (talk) 02:21, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that his name is Lelouch V. Britannia. So his real name begins with the letter V   UeArtemis (talk) 19:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIDDLE NAME 

message: Lelouch's real name is Lelouch vi Britannia, not Lamperouge. It was long ago suggested on the talk page that the article be renamed to reflect this, and there was no disagreement. Could someone please get around to this? 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lelouch_Lamperouge&oldid=242463833#Lelouch_vi_Britannia_vs_Lamperouge  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.245.176 (talk) 02:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lelouch vi Britannia 

message: I admit I haven't kept up with the spin-off mangas and OVA, but I really don't see how Lelouch is considered a fictional twin. Delete? The Shady Red Lamp (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a Rolo in a spinoff manga that is Lelouch's twin. I don't see how relevant is that for the article though.Tintor2 (talk) 02:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Twins? 

message: It is clearly stated in the article itself that his "real name is Lelouch vi Britannia."   Given this fact, why IS the article not listed under it as such?  It is his actual name.  Lamperouge is a pseudonym he assumed to hide from would be assassination during his years in exile.  So even though the discussion was archived and closed; would somebody please tell me WHY this is the case?  Why is the article NOT listed by his real name?  It's like listing President Dwight D. Eisenhower under his nickname Ike Eisenhower.  I am not trying to restart the change campaign, I am only asking why this entry is listed as it is.  Jason Palpatine (talk) 10:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Name 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lelouch Lamperouge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111210095233/http://www.mania.com/code-geass-lelouch-rebellion-r2-part-4-also-wle_article_119422.html to http://www.mania.com/code-geass-lelouch-rebellion-r2-part-4-also-wle_article_119422.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion