lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Issue (computers)

message: Something is fishy here. It this really a technical term? I cut this article out of issue. The current text was created by an anon in 2003 and strikes me as a pretty naive one. mikka (t) 19:23, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "issue" has a special meaning in computer science. Kslotte (talk) 11:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * I support a merging with Issue management. --Kslotte (talk) 14:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Merge completed per above. Jeepday (talk) 23:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Skaw, Unst

message: What on earth is it? Surely the defences were against U boats so maybe the naming is wrong??--JBellis 18:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Coastal Defence (CD) radar was initially designed for use by the Army for Gun and Light Laying (GL).  These then became the RAF Chain Home Low (CHL) radar.  Some of the CD sets were modified to a shorter wavelength to make them more suitable for finding U-Boats near the coast.  These were designated Coastal Defence U Boats (CDU).      --jmb 19:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coastal Defence U-Boat 

message: What is the name of the "unclassified road" to Skaw? Richard75 21:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road to Skaw 

message: this article needsw to be soured think youOo7565 07:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added
Talk:Vertical Man

message: Please pardon my ignorance, but though I think I have read quite a lot about the music industry, I haven't come upon that expression so far. They surely didn't delete the master tapes, did they? --217.232.218.26 16:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This confused me too, so I've changed it to "the album was no longer distributed". Hopefully the intended meaning is still there. -kotra (talk) 12:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does 'the album was deleted' mean? 
Talk:Mokuba Kaiba

message: what is their surname??? And was Noah in the manga. i ahve heard at least vertions
: No, Noah isn't in the manga. The original surname is not known. WhisperToMe 22:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

message: can anyone please find a better picture of Mokuba to replace that hideous one in the infobox? It really is an eyesore and shows a distorted view of the character. If you can, it'd be much appreciated, if not I'll just keep searching for a better one on my own. Stupidhumanzz 05:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  that terrible photo... 

message: The article states that Mokuba was in GX? What episode? I don't recall there being any proof in that. Ggctuk 09:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mokuba in GX?
Talk:Malpartida de Cáceres

message: Does anyone know any information about the jews from Malpartida?  I am looking for information on what happened to the jews and moors.  Also any information surnames "Partida" and "Malpartida" are they derived from this city.
Thanks!  
Josegpartida@yahoo.com
Removed my edit...
DonaldRichardSands (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk:VH1 Storytellers (Ringo Starr album)

message: added hard rock. that version of love me do? completely hard.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterOfBucket (talk • contribs) 22:45, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  hard rock. 

message: Impossible. The live listing must be missing some songs.Cbben (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Songs On Album Than Were Performed Live?
Talk:Consumers Energy 400

message: : page already moved by another editor. Station1 (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: CARFAX 400 → Carfax 400 — - WP:MOSTM --Falcadore (talk) 02:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:O'Reilly Auto Parts 500

message: Not sure if anyone actually follows this talkpage, but I'm curious as to why this isn't just at Texas 500 or something similar. The sponsorship seems to change quite a lot. Using the generic name is something that's worked pretty well with other sport articles (such as FA Cup, which is currently officially the "Emirates FA Cup"). Otherwise the article'll need to be moved over and over. — foxj 17:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsors
Talk:Woof

message: The dog goes mooooooooooooo, Donald trump is an ideot that is dog water and politics but the king of McDonald’s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.215.240.233 (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

message: Should this page really carry a  template? Wikipedia:Disambiguation says that disambiguation serves a single purpose: to let the reader choose among different pages that might reside under the same title. Here we don't have different pages — everything is together... I'm not sure what to do with such pages. Should they carry any tags or should they be splitted? — Pt (T) 20:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, now I've found it: Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Multi-stub pages says that  should be removed. I am bold and now removing it from here, as well as from Oink. — Pt (T) 20:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: {{tl|disambig}}?
Talk:I Wanna Be Santa Claus

message: I don't know that this album is relevant enough to have its own article - aside from it being one of Ringo's worst, it didn't touch the charts and had no singles or appearances from ex-Beatles, etc. I think it could be deleted with no harm done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabboo (talk • contribs) 15:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Deletion
Talk:Tony Parisi (wrestler)

message: Looks good. I think it is well-written and broad enough to be a GA. I looked through it, but nothing really big jumped out at me that needs improvement. Nikki311 22:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback 

message: It says Antonio Pugliese is related to Johnny Swinger, but it doesn't say how.  That's a vital piece of information left out.  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 00:16, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Relation to Johnny Swinger?
Talk:Pala Casino 400

message: Dumping 2006 race info here; generally this information shouldn't be posted on these pages anyway. It is already shown on the 2006 in NASCAR page, etc. Doctorindy 18:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - Full Plot Summary

message: It seems I am here a litle late. However, my contribution. As stated by others it would appear that the majority vote was to keep. Ok, maybe some of these were invalid votes, but I have not seen any justification of which were allowed and which ignored. More to my point, I find that the action taken contradicts the main argument made by many contributors. It was claimed that the articles represent a copyright violation. If this is accepted, then it can not go on any wiki. If it is not accepted, then I would assume that any vote made to delete using these grounds should not be counted. I think this would then have left a majority to keep. I do not see how you could make a decision to transwiki on the grounds that it is a copyvio???
Now, it has been argued that the articles have found a new home on wikibooks. This is not true. The articles as transferred were acceptable to wikibooks on grounds of copyright, but unacceptable on grounds of content. There has been a long discussion there about this. They regard the articles as encyclopedic, and unsuitable for wikibooks. They also have a policy of not accpeting half of a project, the remainder of which is elsewhere. The book has only been accepted provisionally, on the grounds that it will be radically altered. If it were so altered, then it would inevitably subsume and supercede all the HP articles currently on 'pedia. Which of course gives rise to their concern that they do not host encyclopedias, and do not host half projects. I have posted a couple of character write-ups there just to see what would happen. Nothing. It has potential to become an analysis book, but it was and still is in reality an appendix to the articles here. Sandpiper 15:41, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The full plot summary should be moved back to wikipedia if there are issues on wikibooks. The full plot summary is not a copyright vio (in my non lawyer opinion) and it is encyclopedic and noteworthy and the original vote here was clearly to keep it here. zen master T 16:15, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transwiki contrary to stated argument for deletion
Talk:Price–Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act/Talk3

message: Cut from into:
:It also makes available a pool  of insurance funds to compensate people who are injured or incur damages from a nuclear or radiological incident.
During the Mediation, one or more people said that this sentence was a problem. Uncle Ed 13:52, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
::Ben said so, but it's better than the inaccurate line "The Act promises taxpayer-backed indemnity for extraordinary nuclear incidents while providing for limited compensation to victims". Simesa 00:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute over pool 

message: I did a third archive. Everything here is "post moderated" if that makes sense. --Woohookitty 20:55, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Archiving

message: Simesa mentioned this on the moderated talk but just so its here too...the article should be reprotected when Ed leaves for a week or else chaos will ensue, I assure you. :) "Inmates running the asylum" is a good term for it. --Woohookitty 00:39, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Note for Ed

message: Let's not be hasty and start accusing each other of things like:
*over-zealously applying text moves.
*gaming the system
It takes a while to get used to the new rules. We might want to adopt a convention which says that when A moves some text which B wrote (or otherwise approves), then B is not allowed to replace it with something similar. Rather, A and B both should agree on a formulation which satisfies them both. 
And maybe even C should be the one to replace the mutually acceptable version. 
Try to work it out. Aim for unbiased text which does not take sides but which describes both sides. Uncle Ed 01:36, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
:Respectfully, I stand by my original statement.  Do you disagree that those kinds of edits are counter to the text move rules you established?  I ask not to be obstreperous but to have a clear ruling on how exactly we are to interpret your rules.  Is it considered a "revert" of a text move if we reword a sentence to use different words that convey the same meaning of a disputed item that was moved prior? · Katefan0(scribble) 02:59, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
:My only problem is...as we've said before...this article is already mostly criticism. So we're walking a fine line here. The language that Ben wants is going to have to not sound like criticisms of Price-Anderson. Otherwise, we're going to take a tilted article and make it into a near diatribe. I wish myself that we would ban the buzzwords I mentioned earlier because they don't get us anywhere. They are just derisive and dividing. --Woohookitty 02:36, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New rules
Talk:In The Groove song list

message: I do not think Wake Up was in In The Groove 1.  On the local arcade machine it shows up as an addition from In The Groove 2, and it also appears on the In The Groove 2 song list, which is supposedly for only those selections exclusive to ITG 2.  I have reverted the addition of Wake Up; please show evidence that it is an ITG 1 music selection before re-adding.  --69.72.108.196 00:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wake Up
Talk:Jason Scott Lee

message: Is this guy somewhat related to Bruce Lee. Are they relatives? Kassie (talk) 20:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Although they share the same surname, Jason Scott Lee is of no relation to Bruce Lee. Tony619 (talk) 22:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought Jason was 'Oiwi (of aboriginal Hawaiian ancestry), then found out that he was only Chinese.  Now someone actually verified that he is 'Oiwi?  And if someone is specific with his blood quantum, then being a quarter Hawaiian means either his maternal grandfather/grandmother or paternal grandmother was a Hawaiian, or two of his 4 grandparents were half Hawaiian.  So which is it?  --Mamoahina 15:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Oiwi ancestry 
Talk:Dursley

message: The information on Cam should probably be put into a new article Cam, Gloucestershire. Our Phellap 21:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entry on the Hill is a bit POV, ('a lovely asset to the town ...' meaning?, reference?), and travelogue-ish; and we already have an entry for Stinchcombe which refers to Stinchcombe Hill. This all needs some rationalisation, which I have attempted. Bob aka Linuxlad 18:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stinchcombe Hill

message: The introductory paragraph of the Dursley article looks like the scrapings off the cutting-room floor. Could the author please sort it out to the quality of the rest of the article. --Oldontarian (talk) 20:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introductory Paragraph 
Talk:Butanone

message: Does it need to be referred to as 2-butanone? On what other atom can the oxygen be? 82.16.7.63 14:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at the molecule. 2- and 3-butanone are equivalent, so redundant.  If the oxygen was bonded to a terminal carbon, the resulting molecule would be not 1-butanone, but butanal, an aldehyde. Sealicus (talk) 02:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: The use of butanone as a catalyst appears incorrect. The catalyst used is the peroxide, methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP)Sergegian (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I agree with you there. Physchim62 (talk) 10:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalyst 

message: MEK is used in inks.  For example, see http://www.abmmarking.com/ink.htm  I think it would be good for the article to describe this more explicitly.  --Westwind273 (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Inks 

message: It is very important that articles identify what chemicals are petrochemicals because crud oil is the ancient feces of the dinosaurs and it is important to understand how wide spread the science of the chemistry of ancient feces is because they are using it to create medicines. 2602:306:C518:6C40:D5B6:C1CD:4D8E:9B53 (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a derivative of petrochemicals, meaning it isn't present in petrol however, the precursors come from petrol. This doesn't mean it is the only pathway to 2-butanone. The same goes for all organic molecules. Petrol doesn't come from dinosaur feces since it would not concentrate in one location. It is more likely to be dead undersea microorganisms. They probably existed in large numbers in certain locations. Petrol is often found in watery locations. Vmelkon (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Butanone a petrochemical? 

message: The chapter should better contain the word solvent, as well. --Helium4 (talk) 21:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "welding agent" (for PS) 
Talk:Demographics of Saudi Arabia

message: According to the article: "The ethnic composition of Saudi citizens is 90% Arab and 10% Afro-Asian."
However, there are:
* 2.7 million Pakistan nationals in Saudi Arabia: https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1496861/pakistan
* 2.5 million Bangladesh nationals in Saudi Arabia: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/over-217-bangladeshi-workers-deported-from-saudi-arabia/1711803#
* 2,594,947 overseas Indians in Saudi Arabia: https://mea.gov.in/images/attach/NRIs-and-PIOs_1.pdf
According to : "More than 30 per cent of Saudi Arabia’s population of 28 million are thought to be non-nationals."
So the ethnic composition in the current version of the article seems wrong. How could we correct it? A455bcd9 (talk) 19:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The people in these groups are almost surely not Saudi citizens, so it's not a contradiction. 72.197.54.15 (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Fixed A455bcd9 (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic groups 

message: Ok 202.187.226.76 (talk) 17:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is me the person who said Saudi are Syeds
Talk:Commodity computer

message: Yes, good idea. This adds no additional value.
:Oppose: As far as I know, in the field of supercomputers, "commodity computing" does not refer only to x86 PCs, but to every machine that isn't built usign vector processors. This definition includes for example IA-32, AMD64, PowerPC or IA-64 based computers, and even POWER4 processors . --surueña 12:54, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[IBM PC compatible]]
Talk:Lili'oukalani, Queen of Hawai'i

message: Whoever moved this page page improperly via copy and paste, please make sure firstly that if you're going to move an article, move it CORRECTLY. Secondly, if you're going to move an article, could you please, please, PLEASE make sure you spell the name of the person in question CORRECTLY? It's Liliuokalani, not Lilioukalani. Third, if you're going to try and insert an ‘okina, please don't just insert an apostrophe. Instead, use the proper style conventions. 青い(Aoi) 21:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bruce McGivern

message: I have cleaned up some of the grammatical errors on the page however as the errors also effect the facts of the article it will need to be checked by someone with a better knowledge of this article's content.(IRMacGuyver (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup

message: He's not really notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article, should merge and redirect to Resident Evil: Dead Aim until someone can convince me otherwise. Jonny2x4 (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you ant to remove content, place up some merge tags, justs removing the whole article without discussion isn't really very nice! And yes I believe is should be merged, I just don't agree with the way it's being done!Well there wasn't anything to the article anyways, murged it easy...   Doktor  Wilhelm  03:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Cool jazz

message: I copyedited the hell out of the article, and I think much of what was wrong with it is fixed; but there's still a lot more to be written, and that'll take editors who know more about the cool jazz specifics then I do. Anyone? SingCal 01:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Kind of Blue is definitely not Cool jazz. Maybe Miles should be woven into the article earlier. For the moment all I changed is the recording date of Birth of the Cool. ---Sluzzelin 19:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, virtually everything in this article is wrong, starting with the misdating of Birth of the Cool (try 1949-1950) & miscrediting (it was issued under Davis's name but it was a joint project among Davis, Gil Evans, John Lewis, & Gerry Mulligan). The reference to Coleman Hawkins & Lester Young as equal influences is wrong too--they are contrasting stylists & it's the Prez influence that's important for cool-school saxophonists. -- I will try to make a few edits to get the ball rolling. --ND 03:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, where to now? 

message: I've removed the reference to NYC as the origin of the "cool" connotation.  It's a tad counterintuitive, in that many (most?) associate the West Coast with cool jazz (hence the term "west coast cool," a term which uncovers over 60,000 Google hits; also, an earlier editor was of the same opinion).  In any case, in order to avoid a West Coast vs. NY debate, I've simply removed the NYC reference without playing up the West Coast reference. Ex0pos (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Coast vs. NYC? 

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 21:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article previously bore the  tag.  Following the addition of one citation, another editor used an automated tool to change this to .  I can see a couple of sentences that (at least) need clarification, starting with the lede.  I've begun adding some text, with references and I hope to continue this effort. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've expanded the text (essentially a re-write), using multiple sources. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: The first paragraph suggests that postwar, Jazz was only either cool jazz or bebop. So swing etc was killed off by bebop? Just asking. Seems this should be made explicit.  --2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:64C7:92A:F58E:B5EC (talk) 01:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postwar Jazz? 

message: I am a composer of All sorts of music, but I have no experience in Jazz and I like how the Wikipedia pages on Cool Jazz and Chamber Jazz describe it, but they Give no help as to what it could be. What I mean by that is, 
Slower Tempo? How Slow (What Range of Tempos are normally used)?
More Relaxed? In What Way?
More Constant Key Signatures (Which Ones)?
HELP!!!
JuniorGenius07 (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Exactly defines Cool Jazz?
Talk:Power Fist

message: 'Power Fist' is a poorly-named (ungrammatical, bad grammar) popular culture term redirected to an article no longer even mentioning the term, but even if it wasn't run-together words (unlike in that game's literature) there's a historical/ancient term (actually set of terms in a language's dialects) needed to be redirected to first (otherwise disambiguation: ) Changquan#Hand_forms.  Please, when creating articles, check for original/historical/ancient/traditional/definitive terms first.--dchmelik (t|c) 10:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  obsolete redirect, and original/historical/ancient/traditional/definitive power fist
Talk:Ilona Fehér

message: "Ilona Feher" and the "Ilona Feher Foundation" are different, distinct entities.
Wikified. I do not understand the reason and do not know what action to take.
Please advise. Thanks. (by USer:Micke5000, 23:58, 20 July 2005)
:Sorry for not clarifying my intention when I've tagged the articles. Here goes...
:Since Ilona Feher (the person) and Ilona Feher (the Foundation) are different things, the articles should reflect that. So the information about "the person" should be kept to a minimum in the article about "the Foundation", whatever is neede to estableish why it was named after her. If a reader wants more detailed info on "the person" (s)he will follow the link.
:After doing a second and more carefull reading I must admit I may have been to hasty with the tagging. So I'll remove it, even if I still ask you to consider my suggestion of keeping the subjets well separated.
:You did exactly what you should. You went to the talk page and disputed the merge suggestion.
:Welcome! - Nabla 01:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Ilona Feher]] & [[Ilona Feher Foundation]]
Talk:Rosemary Mulligan

message: This wikipedia page is suspiciously similar to this bio page on Mulligan's re-election website. That seems to violate copyright, and violate bias rules of wikipedia. Dstanfor (talk) 05:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politcian's page 