lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Primula

message: I thought we were supposed to use the common names for things as well known as primroses?! Plugwash 00:54, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I replaced the image in the taxobox because it was so over exposed that you cannot see any detail in the plant at all. It was reverted because my picture was not wild. I ask what is more important, that the plant be wild, or that you can see the detail in the plant? HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 13:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced it with a picture of a wild primrose without the overexposure. There's not a lot of detail to be seen on primrose petals, anyway, so overexposure isn't such a problem, but the current image satisfies both criteria. --Stemonitis 07:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in taxobox 

message: noticed we havn't mentioned hybrids or listed them in the species list (eg. Primula veris x vulgaris (False Oxlip))
:Is there an authoritative list of (presumably natural) hybrids to work from? That's usually the problem with these lists, people add randomly with whatever they know about, difficult from verify from source works later. Human-produced hybrids should go into a separate section I think. Stan 04:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hybrids?

message: The 2nd comment above, replying to the 1st, is out of chron. order.  Maybe that practice has merit, but 8 years have passed, and I'd just as soon adhere to chron. order.
The long discussion in those comments is excellent.  But I fault this article for still not revealing the common name used for this genus.  And you can't expect writers to belabor lay readers with a triple whammy—a proper-case, italicized, scientific term.  Would a newspaper be so mincing?
(With apologies to Arlo Guthrie:  "There, on the page . . . in bold letters . . . all caps . . . italicized . . . underlined . . . quotated . . . read the following words:  "KID . . .")
The commenters are abs. correct in insisting that a common name (e.g. primrose) is impermissible if it doesn't denote the entire genus.  On the other hand, what could be the objection to a common term that is the genus name?
I mean, look at the caption on the 2nd photo.  I don't know about you, but I see word "primula"—lowercase, un-italicized, non-technical-looking, as visually soothing as a tranquilizer in an old-age home.  Am I wrong in thinking that all you need do is add "commonly called primula" to a top sentence of the article, and you're done?
And that it might apply to Wiki articles about other genera, where the common and genus name are the same but it's not acknowledged?
Jimlue (talk) 03:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Common name (continued)
Category talk:Rivers of England

message: * The predecessor of this category :Category:English rivers was listed for renaming on March 23, 2004. The following discussion took place (please do not modify).
   
Empty category: all rivers in England are in county categories, e.g. :Category:Rivers in Cumbria.Markussep 12:02, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Category renaming
Talk:Mellow Mushroom

message: Please check for doubles before editing the menu.  Also note that the official website needs to update their menu options, as Magical Mystery Tour is not on the official website but is served in most stores.
Groovy!!!!!!!! Far out!!!! Uptight, outtasight and in the groove!!! Can ye dig it?68.13.191.153 20:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I said the same thing when I moved north >_<216.203.6.11 14:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussion
Talk:Pierre Berthier

message: That is not a major point but, I am surprise that P. Berthier is call "Sir". In France since the révolution everybody is "monsieur" and Sir does not mean anything. If it is because he became "chevalier de la légion d'honneur" that does not mean he can be call sir. Romary 10:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sir

message: What literature or reference indicates Berthier was on the Paris Police homosexual list? The indicated reference does not make mention of this. 2601:145:C200:10C1:68E8:2224:2D18:AE6 (talk) 17:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for Berthier homosexuality claim
Talk:Battle for Mexico City

message: currently links here but actually refers (per the infobox) to a larger section of the war including the mess around Veracruz. It should be shunted to sth else or the infobox should be corrected. — LlywelynII 06:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Mexico City Campaign
Talk:MS-13/ Incorporating M18

message: this page should be deleted m18 is just another name for 18th street gang its the same gang just a differant name due to the fact gangs in central america are called maras
This article is going to bring the M18 into the MS article ready for publication. I can't edit it in one fell swoop so I will do it at this page, watching for any changes in original article. --SqueakBox 01:25, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
You shouldnt merge the two articles together because they are completely different gangs, enemies, and m18 came out of 18th street gang it wasnt founded by salvadorans. Its like merging the crips article and the bloods article together. Guanaco152003 11:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

message: The name mara comes from the Spanish word Marabundi, which is a type of ant. In Salvadoran slang the word had also come to mean posse. Salvatrucha was a Salvadoran word for a hard young man. The origins of "13" and "18" are not certain, though the letter "M" is the thirteenth letter of the alphabet, and is a frequently used letter in names for Southern California Latino gangs, and used to distinguish them from the Northern California gangs, which use the number "14".  The number "13" is also used symbolically in the gang's rites of passage. The MS have a reputation to do their killings on the 13th and the M18 on the 18th of any month.
EDIT: The 18 is because their gang is called 18th Street. There was a Sureno Mexican gang by the name Clanton 14. Some members wanted to create a clique on 18th Street and allow other ethnicities besides Mexicans in the gang. Clanton denied the request and the members broke off. Now there's Clanton 14 and 18th Street who are still rivals in Los Angeles. The gang is also called Barrio 18, and Mara 18. Surenos add 13 because M is the 13th letter in the alphabet. M is for Mexican Mafia. Every Sureno gang puts 13 in their name to pay respect. MS13 is MS13. MS13 and M18 both spread to central America because members got deported.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.12.78 (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The origin of the names
Talk:SEPTA Routes 101 and 102

message: Since when did SEPTA change the color designation for Routes 101 & 102 from brown to green, and why can't we find the old brown designation on earlier versions of Wikipedia anymore? ----DanTD (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it happened, apparently. Leave it to SEPTA to do something stupid. The 101 and 102 have absolutely nothing to do with the already green subway-surface lines in West Philadelphia. Sheesh. --Tsk070 (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more brown for Routes 101 & 102? 

message: All three of the station charts here need location parameters. ----DanTD (talk) 00:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations needed 

message: I just saw some images of these on WorldNYCSubway.org. Did anybody here capture any of the K-Cars painted up like old Philadelphia and West Chester Traction Company trolleys? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  03:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  P&WC Centennial Trolleys 

message: Whilst I accept that the link suggests the name "suburban" the actual page itself does not say this.  The page heading clearly reads "Route 101 & 102 Trolley Line Map".  Please can you revert your change back. - 13:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move
Talk:Phillip Schofield

message: This article is about Phillip Schofield, the person. So how exactly is Willougby's "are you ok" statement relevant here? Surely it would be more suited on Willoughby's own page instead of here. Also this article makes no mention of the fact Willoughby has also left This Morning. 209.93.85.21 (talk) 10:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So, you’d like an irrelevant statement removed and an irrelevant statement added? Got it. Seasider53 (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. And why is Holly Willoughby's article devoid of any mention of the "Are you ok?" speech? The paragraph on this article ("Willoughby, who had previously said she was hurt that Schofield had lied to her when she asked about the rumours, returned to This Morning on 5 June for the first time since his departure") would be better placed on her article rather than here. It's not relevant to this article about Phillip Schofield, the person. Neither is her leaving the show months later. The whole paragraph should be moved from here to Willoughby's article. --195.99.227.0 (talk) 15:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. I think that many observers see her leaving the show, even months later, as connected with Schofield. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point, but that doesn't explain why it's not mentioned once on Willougby's article though. --195.99.227.0 (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that's a matter to raise at Talk:Holly Willoughby. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holly Willoughby statement  

message: Change ‘is a television presenter’ to ‘was a television presenter’ 92.7.6.72 (talk) 08:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This would not be done until he dies. However, it could reasonably be changed to "former television presenter". Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But has he stated he has retired? Do any sources tell us that? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2023
Talk:Heir Apparent (novel)

message: I added one :-)Shindo9Hikaru 00:25, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the infobox 

message: I have greatly expanded the plot summary, made small additions to the character list, and created a new section about the magical objects. The plot summary I found when I came to this page was a bit vague, and I understand why. The plot to this book is quite complicated. I'm usually good at summarizing plots without getting bogged down in details, but this is the sort of book where it's hard to convey the logical flow of the plot without explaining at least some of the details. My summary is fairly long, but I tried to make it as succinct as I could, while giving a sense of what happens in the story. I left out things that didn't advance the plot. For example, I hardly mention Sister Mary Ursula at all, because her character, while colorful and prominent in the story, does not really have a significant effect on the story's outcome. marbeh raglaim (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My expansions 

message: The infobox and introduction to this article call the book fantasy. I'm not sure that's strictly accurate. Technically, it's science fiction: it takes place in the future and centers on futuristic technology, such as VR and artificial intelligence. While most of the novel involves a fantasy game, I don't think that makes the book itself fantasy. Still, I'm going to change the article to say that it's both science fiction and fantasy. marbeh raglaim (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: This section is kind of unnecessary because we just need to give an overview of the plot, not every single item in the book. This is like putting every single location; we don;t need it to give the reader an overall idea. However, I think we do need the info, so you should consider merging it into the plot section (if not already). :-) Thanks! (and I'll stop rambling now), ‽² (Talk²/Contributions²) 22:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My main reason for wanting this section was that I wanted to consolidate information in the plot summary. The plot is incredibly complicated, and it took me a while to file it down to a manageable length. (I am too lazy to look it up right now, but I do remember that one of the advice for writing articles on books is not to have it consist only of a plot summary.) I generally removed descriptions of characters and placed it in the section on the character list. I felt that the descriptions of the magical artifacts was too much detail for the summary, but might be useful for another section. I still made sure to keep the section relatively short. marbeh raglaim (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am actually considering giving it to an editor. I don't mean just for this one question; I think the whole article maybe should be reviewed. marbeh raglaim (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic Artifacts
Talk:Missy Palmer

message: Isn't Missy Palmer also in the local band The Recommended Settings? I'm pretty sure of this, but can't find a reference to document it.
Wellspring 20:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 20:40, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: If this is getting merged anywhere, it should be to The Brothers Chaps, not Homestar Runner. -- Cyrius|✎ 5 July 2005 15:46 (UTC)
:Agreed, though I don't think it should be merged. —BazookaJoe 01:22, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Chigorin Defense

message: If someone could improve the Main variations section that would be great.  I listed the early moves of some of the basic variations from MCO 14.  Basically it just shows one line for each of White's three most plausible replies -- just enough to get some of the flavor of the possibilities.  If you know how Morozevich plays it, you might be able to improve this section. --Quale 02:53, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: The article says "Black must be prepared to trade a bishop for a knight" (emphasis mine). Looking at the variations, I presume this is because after 3. Nf3 the only play given is 3... Bg4 4. cxd5 Bxf3. Still, why are these moves obligatory? 91.107.163.90 (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bishop for knight trade
Talk:Julian Sark

message: I've expanded the biography but more information about season 3 activities would be good.Otto4711 22:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The biography section is getting rather long. Perhaps some sub-headings would be useful? An organization by season could be reasonable. -Phoenixrod 08:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split the Biography section according to seasons as well as replaced some instances of the character's name with pronouns (namely "he"). ILorbb | Talk 11:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded biography 

message: Is his name a pun on the word "shark" or is it from Tron (the villain's name is Sark)?
'Sark' is a small island in the southwestern English Channel. See Wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sark 210.50.196.100 (talk) 20:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:The Official Star Wars Fan Film Awards

message: Needs to be updated for 2005 -Anonymous
:Someone took care of this a while back. I added the director of Return of the Ewok. The Wookieepedian 15:45, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be updated 

message: The Nav home off.jpeg is NOT a logo, it's just an image swiped from the Atomfilms site. It's redundant and unecessary, especially when the actual logo is at the top of the page. TheRealFennShysa 03:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I put it back, but reworded the caption to explain that it is an image from their site. The Wookieepedian 04:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In which case, you've admitted that you lifted an out-of-context image and reposted it without permission. At least the images I posted are either A) a photograph of one of the trophies I have in my possession, or B) isolated clean elements... That image you posted is redundant, unnecessary, and speaking as a filmmaker with two of the films on the list, would you PLEASE stop mucking about with a page that doesn't need it? TheRealFennShysa 04:09, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, OK! But, they deleted the original photograph of the trophy you originally had on here. After scanning the net, I found a similar picture, and it is now on the page. The Wookieepedian 04:19, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I see you re-uploaded it. Nevermind. The Wookieepedian 04:23, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: What's that all about?85.211.254.246 08:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No union members?

message: Kevin Walsh and Jason Ginsburg are listed as producers in the official press release on Atom's page for Padme.  Who took their names  off?  They're going back up unless someone responds.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westcoastbrainiac (talk • contribs) 20:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only the directors are listed for each film on this page - Padme should be no different. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking off credits?
Talk:Jbel Toubkal

message: "It is possible to climb the mountain in two days - first day up to the refuge (around seven hours without mules), second day to the summit (around five hours) and back to Imlil (up to five hours)."
That is nearly impossible ! It takes a lot more than 10 hours to climb the summit, get back to the refuge then arrive at Imlil ! Even local people can't do that!
Believe me it is possible, we have managed that. By 10 hours I mean net time. We started the summit ascent early (around five), four hours up (around nine o'clock), 2:30 back to the refuge (around noon, packing up our properties and relaxing a bit) and back to Imlil - we managed to get back between seven and eight in the evening. Everything without proper acclimatization. And I'm no great hiker, I'm overweight office rat...
Kober 11:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definatly possible, down is so much quicker, we went from the refuge back to imlil in 2 hours 10 mins; from five to get up. Probably only possible in that sort of time in summer though.----GreatestrowereverTalk Page 17:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mount Chirripó

message: This text was added to the article improperly by a new user, , some of it can be incorporated into the article, PROPERLY:
:Mt Chirripo is situated right next to San Gerardo de Rivas - a small village with a traditional agricultural base, that has become a hub for Chirripo hikers and climbers. But the village has all sorts of other delights including Cloudbridge Reserve with its many waterfalls (www.cloudbridge.org),the agua termales (hot springs) and opportunities to view rare orchids, exquisite birds including rare quetzals and cloud forest. The village also hosts the annual Chirripo Race - an 11km run up Mt Chirripo that brings athletes from around the world to attend. See www.sangerardocostarica.com
IP4240207xx 08:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text added by new user: Jenny53 

message: Hello Chirripó fans. I was brave and changed the name of the article from Cerro Chirripó to Mount Chirripó because, to my way of thinking, "cerro" is not a word in English and it has a perfectly good English translation: mount. However, I opted to keep the tilde on the last vowel because I know without it, English speakers will have no guidance on how to pronounce the word, and I like to keep pronunciation consistent as much as possible between Spanish and English. If I have caused problems or confusion, please remember that was not my intention, and kindly let me know how I can make such a name change in a better way in the future. DBlomgren (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name to Mount Chirripó 
Talk:New Fourth Army incident

message: It is incorrect to use the Five-Star red flag of the PRC for this article, which is about an event that happened before October 1st, 1949. DOR (HK) (talk) 08:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: In early October, Chen Yi's unit fought and won a decisive battle at Huangch'iao in north Kiangsu with Han Deqin's troops commanded by Li Shouwei. Kataoka, Tetsuya: ‘’Resistance and Revolution in China: The Communists and the Second United Front’’ (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), p 222 http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft6v19p16j&chunk.id=d0e11449&toc.depth=100&toc.id=d0e9048&brand=ucpress DOR (HK) (talk) 08:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Setting the Scene

message: I have semi protected the article for one week due to disruptive editing / edit warring. To the IPs engaged in this, please stop and discuss your proposed changes here on the talk page. Consensus needs to be established before making further changes. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring
Talk:Teide

message: In English, it's called Mount Teide, so shouldn't this be the article name, as per WP:USEENGLISH? Joseph2302 (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for raising this point. A Google search for "Teide" (excluding "Mount Teide" and "Mt Teide") gives me about 5,400,000 web pages in English. So, "Teide" is an English name for the mountain. A Google search for "Mount Teide" gives me about 336,000 web pages. A Google search for "Mt. Teide" gives me about 41,000 web pages. This suggests to me that "Teide" is the English WP:COMMONNAME; therefore I think that "Teide" is an acceptable name to continue using for this article's title. I suggest that the start of the first sentence of the article could be changed from "Mount Teide" to "Teide, or Mount Teide" for improved accuracy, completeness and consistency. GeoWriter (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After waiting 12 days for further discussion, I have changed the first sentence of the article as per my suggestion of 22 December 2020. GeoWriter (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teide or Mount Teide? 

message: UNESCO considers Teide the third tallest volcanic structure in the world and not the fourth as it says in the article: Teide National Park, UNESCO.--87.223.111.136 (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for reporting this. I have restored the correct version of the text. GeoWriter (talk) 22:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNESCO considers it the third tallest volcanic structure in the world and not the fourth
Talk:Rysy

message: Well...
"Rysy is the highest Tatra mountain available to individual tourists (without a guide)." What about slovakian mount "Lomnica" where tourists can go using gondola lift (I have no idea how that "device" is called in English)... 
Rysy are the highest mountain in Poland but the article says that Rysy is the highest Tatra mountain availible to indyvidual tourists. 212.2.100.132 20:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I clarified it by adding 'on foot.'--Svetovid (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error? 

message: I just wanted to note that  has changed the height of the northwestern peak from 2499m to 2500m, and again after being reverted by . There is a source that suggests that 2499 might not be accurate, but it really goes no farther than to call it "2499.9±1" and say "maybe". Not sure how to sort this out, just wanted to note it. – BMacZero (🗩) 04:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northwestern peak altitude