lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thorvald Stauning

message: The king had a merely symbolical role but ordered the army and navy to stop fighting against the German invaders? Something is wrong with this picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.222.218.157 (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The above commenter is correct, this is a ridiculous hagiography that completely minimises any responsibility Stauning had for the complete failure of Denmark to defend itself on 9 April 1940 for which Stauning (not the figurehead King, for pete's sake!) was ultimately responsible. See Hitler Strikes North amongst other sources for much, much more critical coverage of Stauning's role. FOARP (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagiography
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Walton monarchist89

message: Mainspace	124
Talk:	142
Template:	1
User talk:	122
User:	18
Wikipedia talk:	1
Wikipedia:	19
avg edits per article	2.69
earliest	15:38, 20 February 2006
number of unique articles	159
total	427
Editcount stats generated using Interiot's wanna-be Kate Tool. Nishkid64 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Politics of Kazakhstan

message: this is not enough. There are lots of things that is not written which supposed to be in this article. The author talks alot about the voting issues and party domination on Kazakhstan. If you ask me, that's only a minor part of this article. Where are your points on the three branches? You only talked a bit about them. And they are not even clear. You say that there is a prime minisiter who is the head of government. Is that for real? And if that for real, then why is it a presidential form of government. It seems that your article says its a semi-presidenmtial form. But to me, this government is becoming of a one man rule. Please critique —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.213.149.94 (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics 

message: By the content of this article, I assume, it should be named as Political system of Kazakhstan. But I'm new in English Wiki thereby I decide to ask others first. --Deviloper (talk) 04:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Talk:Goober

message: Thank you for your useless edits of a preceding version of a page that I had already cleaned up. If this weren't a serious attempt at an encyclopaedia, I'd list you on the page as well, seeing as a goober is what you clearly are. Matt.T.911 (talk) 02:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BlastOButter42 

message: www.drunkduck.com/Goober_Nice_To_Meep_You/
is a comic that seems written with children in mind and has the main character named Goober.
63.138.247.2 (talk) 02:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  also a character in a webcomic 

message: what.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.29.160.175 (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: what is this
Talk:National Law University (NLU)

message: Hi, till Aug 4, 08 the last sentence of the intro to the article read 'Since then a number of other national law schools have been established all over India and various other States are also considering options to establish such schools.' however on Aug 10, 08 an anon changed to a potentially controversial and unreferenced 'While a number of other institutes modelled on the latter have been established across the country since then, it is generally acknowledged that the  National Law School and the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences are the premier establishments imparting legal education in the country and arguably the best represented law schools among lawyers at top companies and law firms both in India and abroad.' (emphasis added), later on May 13, 09 a new user changed it to 'While a number of ... generally acknowledged that the  National Law School and the NALSAR University of Law are the premier ....' Both the claims (by anon and the new user) were never referenced, contained weasel words and are potentially controversial as the law students from various universities would like to change them in future and put their own universities name instead. Hence to avoid such repeated and potentially disrupting edits, I have reverted the last line of the intro to the more docile Aug 4, 08 version. LegalEagle (talk) 04:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your concern is right LegalEagle, adding one or two references to the rankings  of law schools conducted by various magazines will surely make such statements NPOV. Trying to find out links. Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary dated June 12, 2009 on intro 

message: It is situated in rohtak haryana. Advocate mohit vashist (talk) 15:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  vaish college of law 

message: New Wiki page should be and must be Created in the name of Dharmashastra National Law University. --Kulbhushan Jhadav (talk) 20:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dharmashastra National Law University
Talk:List of current BBC newsreaders

message: I've noticed the growing number of articles being created for newsreaders and reporters on the BBC and feel that it might be time to do something about it. My idea is to change this article into simply a list, with brief biographies for each journalist and remove the actual main article for the less well known ones. The main presenters should stay as they are with their respective articles, but lesser known ones are not entirely necessary.
What does everyone think? Wikiwoohoo 14:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go along with that - it is pretty much an exact duplicate. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 17:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revamp?
File talk:Phases of the Moon.png

message: Although, as previously noted by an anonymous commenter, earlier versions did not have correct lighting of the Earth (but instead as if sun were +z), Willem's version has exacerbated this problem and introduced others. In the Original diagram the Sun is at the center of the circle the Earth is tracing i.e; +y; in order for the phases to be correct. Willem's version has the Sun at +x. Worse, Willem seems to have interpreted an optical illusion in the original that suggests the Earth's orbit is wavy, when it is not, at least not on the scale suggested by the braided baths traced on the 3rd version of this diagram. --Belg4mit (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogosity
Talk:Hot Lips Page

message: Removing the link to Joe Glaser - the article doesn't deal with Armstrong's manager but some guitar maker. The "right" Joe sounds like he was a colourful character, deserving an article. Until then though... CCooke 18:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Glaser 

message: I've moved this article to "Hot Lips Page", as that's the name by which the subject is known (much as Paul Hewson has a page at Bono, Eric Blair has one at George Orwell etc.). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: Googling finds many references to the second name as being "Thaddeus". Any refs? Alien Life Form (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Name 
Talk:Euler reciprocity relationship

message: It's a nice page, but what exactly is the Euler Reciprocity relationship? The last formula? A little more explanation between the formulas wouldn't harm. By the way, I took the liberty of changing your δ symbols to \partial assuming you meant partial derivatives. CompuChip 18:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The point in question is already covered on closed and exact forms. Charles Matthews 23:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bhakta

message: Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. a good alternative is Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources for the term [[dharmic religions]]?
Talk:Tripartite Convention

message: Bismarck and the Berlin Treaty
Given that Bismarck died in 1898, *a year before this treaty*, and had in any case been removed from office in 1890, I rather think he wouldn't have had much use for the western Samoan islands. Have updated the article with Bulow instead, as the German foreign secretary at the time (and the one who did all the work given that Hohenlohe the chancellor was something of a non-entity at this time). 172.209.33.130 19:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The lack of Samoan customs for electing a new king lead to the Samoan civil war in 1898. It was then obvious that the best solution would be a partitioning of Samoa between Germany, the United States, and England."
"Obvious"?  Seriously? --Jfruh (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonialist POV 

message: In my library on colonial matters I have found no reference to a Treaty of Berlin (1899).  Therefore, it is my opinion that this page is dubious.  There was an Anglo-German Agreement on Samoa negotiated at London and signed on 14 November 1899; followed by the Tripartite Convention (United States, Germany, Great Britain) which partitioned the Samoan Islands and was signed at Washington on 2 December 1899 with ratifications exchanged on 16 February 1900.  In my view, the most exhaustive source covering these events is:
* Ryden, George Herbert. The Foreign Policy of the United States in Relation to Samoa.  New York: Octagon Books, 1975. 634 pages. (Reprint by special arrangement with Yale University Press. Originally published at New Haven: Yale University Press, 1928.)
Unless an editor can cite a reputable source for something called “Treaty of Berlin (1899),” a review, renaming and rewrite to remove the blather seems to be in order.
--Gamahler (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No reaction. Will attempt the obvious for this page: rename, rewrite.--Gamahler (talk) 21:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction? 

message: The lead sentence of this article says, "The Tripartite Convention of 1899 resulted in the act that formally partitioned the Samoan archipelago into a German colony and a United States territory ...". However, the third paragraph in The Future of American Samoa, Foreign Affairs, October 1928 says, "... The tripartite convention of 1899 did not grant sovereignty to the United States. The three powers had previously acknowledged Samoa to be independent, and by this convention Great Britain and Germany merely renounced in favor of the United States all their 'rights and claims over and in respect to' the eastern islands. ...".
In the lead sentence of the article, should the words, "into a German colony and a United States territory" be changed to read, " be changed to read something like, "between Germany and the United States"? Should the words, "partitioned the Samoan archipelago" be changed to read, "partitioned interests in the Samoan archipelago"?Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  US sovereignty
Talk:Hole in one (disambiguation)

message: I have reverted to a more helpful format - the previous version does not explain that it is a golf term, that the last item comes from an American show and piping is fine for book, song, TV titles. BlueValour 19:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I have reverted to a version that is consistent with WP:MOSDAB for intro praragraph and formatting titles. Correct piping for formatting is fine, yes.  Incorrect piping which obfuscates the parenthetical is not.  I will add clarifying text to the corrected version. -- JHunterJ 11:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Maurice Gwyer

message: The link requires a subscription. If anyone requires details or a copy, then drop me a line. Mdann52 (talk) 12:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on copyvio 

message: Geoffrey Faber and Gwyer established the London publisher Faber and Gwyer Limited, succeeded in 1929 by Faber and Faber Limited.
: LCCN no2014-069114 Faber & Gwyer
: LCCN n92-111500 Faber and Faber
--P64 (talk) 21:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faber and Gwyer; Faber and Faber
Talk:Cassegrain antenna

message: A very important antenna in need of some more information which I hope to add but will be a few weeks/months somebody may wish to add earlier.
I think the following needs adding:
The reflector surface profiles/geometry (I think parabolic for the main and hyperbolic for the subreflector).
For the cassegrain of course the focus of the main reflector should coincide with one of the focii of the subreflector such that the concave surface of the main faces the convex surface of the sub. It should link to the gregorian antenna for which it uses the other focus of the sub.
Problem: obstruction of the beam by the subreflector and structure holding it: also scattering which causes sidelobes. f/d ratio.
Coherent phase at the aperture (but distorted by the varying incident angles.
Allows a relatively simploe feed from behind the main reflector (eg. a small waveguide horn antenna or beam waveguide.
It was derived from the equivalent cassegrain optical telescope based on the same principle. There is an IEEE/IRE paper by Hannan I believe but I have lost mine.
The aperture needs to be much greater than the wavelength or diffraction causes big sidelobes.
ChrisAngove 19:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More information
Talk:Michael Swann

message: Is this Lord Swann who wrote "Education for All" in 1985?  If so that is an important omission.
- Yes, it was by him. See http://www.dg.dial.pipex.com/documents/docs3/swann00.shtml for some blurbs
Sjhill (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Madurai Sultanate

message: A rich merchant from Ma'bar, Abu Ali, was associated closely with the Ma'bar royal family. After falling out with them, he fled to Yuan dynasty China and was granted an official job and a Korean woman as his wife by the Mongol Emperor.
http://books.google.com/books?id=GSA_AaRdgioC&pg=PA138#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/41649921?uid=3739832&uid=2460338175&uid=2460337935&uid=2&uid=4&uid=83&uid=63&uid=3739256&sid=21103639240407
04:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abu Ali of Ma'bar 

message: A book that is from the 20’s and hindu sources aren’t enough to detail the rule of the Sultanate. Especially since it focuses on only one ruler. 2001:1970:5163:1200:0:0:0:5CDE (talk) 16:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary and neutral sources needed.
Talk:Disney Interactive Studios

message: The 1996 video game for Sega Genesis and Super NES based on some early 1940s Disney movie about a wooden boy included a "Disney Interactive" logo alongside a Virgin Interactive logo. Is this the same division? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 04:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinocchio game made by same division? 

message: This is very strange. Why do we? bibliomaniac15 00:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do we have two seperate lists of games? 

message: The video game franchise Spectrobes was Disney Interactive Studios' first original IP. Why is it never mentioned in the main article for Disney Interactive Studios? The first entry broke 700,000 copies sold in its first month and is a significant milestone in the publisher's history. It deserves to appear under the History section, further under the Disney Interactive Studios subheading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Didn'tRealizeTheShowWasOver (talk • contribs) 16:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spectrobes as a Franchise.
Talk:Richard Turner (magician)

message: All of Special:Contributions/Jack O Diamonds 's edits need to be reverted as he claims he called Richard Turner on the telephone. He then wrote it all up as his wikipedia article. It's a shame as the subject is very interesting, but we need reliable sources, not "telephonic conversations". --Rajah (talk) 05:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Almost whole article is original research

message: I've been working on cleaning up this page--after seeing Dealt, great movie!--and the recognition section is all just copied directly from Turner's website. If people want to track down some of these original quotes to find where they first appeared, I think it would be fine back in the article, but as-is, they're not okay for BPL reasons. Hopefully this is enough with some other style edits to remove the tags from the page. Thanks! Jessamyn (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional recognition section
Talk:M-211 (Michigan highway)

message: This article has all the "big four", so it's at C-class. CL — 05:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Western Eye Hospital

message: I changed the date of the foundation from 1855 to 1856. My sources are http://www.mrcophth.com/Historyofophthalmology/ophthalmologyinuk.htm and http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/hospitalrecords/details.asp?id=720&page=69 , but I don't think it's worth including these references in the article.
The original article by Mrbubblefishman on 24 August 2006 said: "will celebrate its 150th birthday in november 2006" (now!), but this was edited out by  ENeville on 9 September 2006 -- why? Isidore 19:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:List of W.I.T.C.H. episodes

message: Please, the animated series do NOT have a place called Metamoor so please stop putting that word in every new W.I.T.C.H. topic. Sarochi
:Actually, I think it was called Metaworld, as opposed to Metamoor. May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg (drop me a line) 20:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I never knew that before. Thanks for clearing things up! May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg (drop me a line) 21:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ok, not sure about this one, but can anyone see if it's acceptable for us to use quotes from the episodes, plus they might be in violation of WP:NPOV. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg (drop me a line) 20:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: It should comply with this and this! I've prepared a new version, which I'll post tomorrow, but the summaries aren't finished. If you think it's too early say the word. Besides, it's a wiki, it can always be reverted. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 15:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, submitting new version now. Discuss improvements, and exaplain here if you decide to revert. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 11:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is in serious need of help 

message: I will evidence, no rumours.ParkingWii (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Season?  

message: Need your help to improve and reorganise W.I.T.C.H. and its related articles, as well as their structures. Discuss more at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disney#W.I.T.C.H.. -- JSH-alive talk • cont • mail 11:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up issues
Talk:John Leveson-Gower, 1st Earl Gower

message: The article on Adams Grammar School, Newport, (in Shropshire) lists this nobleman as an alumnus of the school but I see no corresponding details of his education (he was surely of background to afford public school/university) in this biographical article.  Citation and indication of years attending the school would be appreciable.Cloptonson (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 1st Earl Gower had died in 1754 before the French Revolution began; the Earl Gower who became ambassador to France in 1790 was a later generation Earl. I will check the latter's article before dealing with the misplaced section here.Cloptonson (talk) 21:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Earl mentioned in section Intelligence during French Revolution
Talk:Sacred Steel (musical tradition)

message: Just wondering.. guitarist Derek Trucks uses slide guitar to reach the same sound effects.  It can sound like a woman singing or crying, or in prayer. Is there room for this, and the harmonics in this article? --leahtwosaints (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think that would be appropriate since it's covered in other articles.  This article exists to document that a unique form of sacred music grew up within The Black Church and specifically the Word of God Churches as listed by proper name in the article.  This Sacred Steel musical movement is not the reason Derek trucks learned to play Steel Guitar nor did he attend any of the involved Churches.  However, I can see a time in the future, now that Robert Randolph has crossed over into the world of secular Pop/rock music, where musicians not from this background will be influenced by the style of Sacred Steel and that will be worth documenting.  I think a more important task would be getting articles up and running on the founders of Sacred Steel and the 2nd and 3rd generations of performers of the musical tradition.  As for harmonics, if you want to discuss or reference one of the members of the movement and how THEY use harmonics, that would be great!  Just be sure to cite a reference to back up any claims and rather than re-state the whole Harmonics issue, add a link to the article on the subject.  That is a good idea!  And BTW, thanks for taking an interest in this article.LiPollis (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about artists who use the guitar?
Talk:Grand Turk Island

message: ::Are there Turks live? LOL I have never get  reply neverthless search it.  21:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *See WHAT ARE THE ORIGINS OF THE NAME GRAND TURK?. I would tend to lean toward the non cactus idea. If by 1725 the pirate lair islands were annotated Isles Turques on a chart the largest would naturally be "Grand". Palmeira (talk) 15:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone knows Why this island is called "Grand Turk" island? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.105.19.226 (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the name? 
Talk:Henna gaijin

message: Why propose this for speedy deletion? The reasoning behind this seems excessive.
LHOON 16:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion? 

message: I noticed that the 'Characteristics' section of the article had been deleted. I looked at the history of the article and found that someone removed it because they claimed it was a copyright violation. It certainly wasn't. I didn't plagiarize at all. I got my information from many sources, therefore that would be research, not plagiarism. In addition to this, I'd like to say that I also didn't copy the information word-for-word, I wrote it in my own words.
I'm going to rewrite it, because it's not a copyright violation. - Onur 15:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It certainly wasn't a copyright violation. 

message: Although Japanophiles and henna gaijin are close, they're not necessarily the same thing. Therefore, the article shouldn't be merged with Japanophile. Onur 15:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree with LHOON
Talk:Vamar Shipwreck Site

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* The Florida Bureau of Archaeological Research Coordinates for this site are
29° 53’ 56” N, 85° 27’ 48” W
Bureau Underwater (talk) 18:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: "inherent instability and lowered center of gravity could have led to her demise" ?? A lowered center of gravity does not compromise the seaworthiness of a vessel. Chris the speller (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowered center of gravity?