Talk:Campbell Brown (journalist)

message: why delete the information about campbell browns lisp.  i think it is important because it is a fact, and because it is representitive of the capabilities of people with a lisp.
:Is there a source for your claim that she has a lisp? I'm watching her on The Tonight Show right now and I haven't noticed anything wrong with her speech... --AMK1211 04:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:OR -- 98.108.203.136 (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Somebody block that IP that tries to delete the contents or adds inappropriate information! Is it possible to require a login to edit this article? DXPG 16:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: :Image:Campbell Brown 10.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Campbell Brown 10.jpg

message: It seems gratuitous and snarky to include material on her father's legal problems -- I don't see how it relates to Brown or her career. If people are that interested in her father, they can click on the link to his article and read all about it in his article. --A. B. (talk •  contribs)  00:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The New York Times thought it was relevant and interesting enough to devote a paragraph to it in a decent piece. It can be presented her but just shouldn't be given undue weight or make some sort of accusation about the subject..Cptnono (talk) 09:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with Cptnono comments, because it seems significant enough to at least mention. --Salem XIII (talk) 14:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's record 

message: it seems odd to me that there are several references and citations noted in this article, yet the article is flagged as not having sources or references. 
also, i think that if a subject has a parent who was a public official etc. that should be included- I think simply trying to cut out that out info  because someone deems it,in their view, as "snarky"...well that action of omission seems like snarky "scrubbing"-- I think that is the term used when it seems like the page is being altered to clean things up in benefit of the subject's agenda rather than as a benefit to inform, that is just my impression.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4rousseau (talk • contribs) 22:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   lies by omission? 

message: Something needs to be done about the section covering the mention of "Kurdistan" on a recent show. It's questionable as to whether what happened was "doing a big mistake", or whatever the phrase was. And I don't think the fact that Kurdistan is not a country needs to be in all caps. StanHater (talk) 20:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kurdistan" 

message: Where is she now? --93.82.5.210 (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Campbell Brown

message: I understand that we mention her two children, but I don't think an encyclopedic article should mention when and where her pregnancy was first announced to the public. --194.24.138.4 (talk) 22:47, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pregnancy announcements 

message: Is it really the best that can be done for her picture on the page to be a blurry screen-grab of her with her head turned?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.241.181 (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not a "screen-grab", as the uncropped original shown. However I think it is probably one of the worst photos currently illustrating someone's article on Wikipedia. I think it should be a challenge to take or locate a better free licensed photo. Perhaps someone should write to her requesting one per OTRS? -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profile Pic. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Campbell Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111182428/http://www.8theplay.com/about-8/the-characters/ to http://www.8theplay.com/about-8/the-characters/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently states that Brown was criticized in 2008 for being biased since her husband worked as an advisor to the Romney campaign. Romney ran in 2012 and they met around then. 2600:4041:5ED1:AC00:7D22:2F79:E924:8D16 (talk) 03:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect dates for Dan Senor and Romney