Talk:Indian python

message: "The longest recorded specimen measured 5.85 m (19 ft 2 in) (Cooch-Behar, West Bengal)." If this is a maximum for the nominate (P. m. molurus), it should be made clear. It's too low for the maximum of this species, as subspecies bivittatus (which, for some reason, has its own article) grows much larger than this. --Anshelm '77 16:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but when I recently fixed up this article, I didn't have much in the way of specific information on pythonids with which to do any fact checking. I have lots of information on viperids, as well as general taxonomic and geographical data, but not much else (good books cost lots of money). I suspect that you are right about this value in that it probably applies to P. m. molurus; earlier version of these articles were written as though the contributers were unaware that the P. m. molurus and P. m. bivittatus are related. If nobody else does, I suspect that I will eventually correct all this information myself, although that may take a while. Hey, you wanna help out?! Ha, just joking. Cheers, --Jwinius 20:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: Hi! Unfortunately this page includes many inconsistencies. Probably there is some helpful information at the German Wikipedia for upgrading this page:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigerpython
Good luck! 84.74.165.175 (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Idea for Improvement

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Python molurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611182948/http://www.ecologyasia.com/verts/snakes/indian_python.htm to http://ecologyasia.com/verts/snakes/indian_python.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Python molurus →  – or . This species has a well-accepted and unambiguous common name, so I suggest we move the article to that title. The target name has always directed to this subject. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Question. The species has several common names. Why choose this one? YorkshireExpat (talk) 09:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Indian python" is, by far, the most common name among the vernacular names. Here is an NGram comparison. In this case, the vernacular name may be even less ambiguous than the binomial, because the Burmese python was only recently recognized as distinct from this one (2009 according to the Wikipedia article). It was long considered a subspecies known as Python molurus bivittatus, so many references to the Burmese python will use "Python molurus". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Google Scholar results also show "Indian python" as more than twice as common as the others tested in the NGram above (using quotes around the strings to try to limit the results to exact matches). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 July 2022