Talk:Croat–Bosniak War

message: It is not true that Josipović apologized "for Croatia's involvement in efforts to divide Bosnia and Herzegovina" as you state it. If you follow the link by the text you can find real text of appologie: ".. I deeply regret that these politics contributed to the deaths of people and divisions that still haunt us."  So he's not talking about division of Bosnia, he is talking about nationalism as predominant ideologie what caused war and suffering.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.141.62.173 (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croatia's president appologie 

message: I moved the page to Croat-Muslim war because the term is more often used then the earlier (current) one. I got some 630 635 results and some 380 342 results for Muslim-Croat War. Croat-Bosniak War shows some 90 results and Bosniak-Croat war shows some 30 resuls (Google Books). --Wüstenfuchs 11:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Common name isn't the only thing that's taken into account for article titles. Using "Muslim", which constitute 1.57 billion people of the world and spans many ethnic groups, is an incredibly ambiguous title and unprecise as opposed to "Bosniak". --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 11:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's not a problem at all. Nobody can't be confused about that. Everything is explained in the lead and WP:COMMONNAME should be followed in this case, considering the number of results (900 to 100) --Wüstenfuchs 12:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you saying they can or can't be confused? Double negatives don't fly in English. The article title must be precise regardless of what the lede says. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 12:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thx for the note. Also, I must agree with you about the WP:PRECISION, since the Google books is mixed up... Agreed to current title. --Wüstenfuchs 12:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

text:  I don't know what you are looking at, but on Google Books I get 41 hits for C-M war , 16 hits for C-B war  and 44 hits for M-C war . Doesn't look like a lay-down misere to me. I must agree with PRODUCER though, Bosniak is more precise per WP:TITLE. Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  See here Peacemaker... 635. --Wüstenfuchs 12:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: click on the 5 at the bottom of the page. Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What about it? --Wüstenfuchs 12:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: what does it say at the top now? Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: and I think the RfC is a bit of a hair trigger reaction. Discuss it here and see if we can get consensus (using the right number of hits from your Google Books searches). Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, yes, I noticed. But still it's significantly more then CB... The page is mixed up, when you click "1" it shows 1.300 results... :/ Nevertheless, Schoolar also shows more results for CM. --Wüstenfuchs 12:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be working on the basis that there is no WP:COMMONNAME, so we use the principles listed at WP:TITLE. Precision is looking good. Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I suggest you delete the whole article and start from zero cause it has little to do with objectivity - looks like propaganda. Shame for Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.254.198 (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubbish 

message: I agree. This article does not only look like propaganda. This is definitely propaganda with so many mistakes it can only be written from scratch! Rubbish!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.178.253.193 (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda rubbish 

message: How is it possible that "More Croatian soldiers died in fighting against the ARBiH than against the JNA or RSK forces in Croatia" if the estimated number of soldiers killed in the war in Croatia is between 6,788–8,784, and in the Bosnian War the HV-HVO had 6,000 soldiers killed, with the vast majority being HVO members? Tzowu (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Bobetko himself said at least 9,000 HV soldiers died fighting the ARBiH. --Potočnik (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe that 9,000 Croats or Croat soldiers from both the HV and HVO have died, which is also an overestimation (Goldstein says 10,000 Croats, both civilians and soldiers, died in the Croat-Bosniak war, which is also too high). The IDC from Sarajevo in the "Bosnian book of the dead" has the number of killed or missing HV-HVO at 6,000 total in the Bosnian War.  Tzowu (talk) 22:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Jovan Divjak said that in the conversation, he said "Sadly, more Croatian soldiers were killed in battles against the ARBiH than fighting in Croatia itself, against either the JNA or the Serb krajina forces" (page 102) Both Carol Off and Gallagher are using that conversation in what is referenced to their books. Tzowu (talk) 22:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --Potočnik (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some math 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Croat–Bosniak War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131104173309/http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/70ef163b25b2333fc1256991004de370/3e70ccf5ab7cd9c9802566710056e56f?OpenDocument to http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/70ef163b25b2333fc1256991004de370/3e70ccf5ab7cd9c9802566710056e56f?OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: this article has a statement: The Serb and Croat political leadership agreed on a partition of BiH with the 1991 Karađorđevo agreement and the 1992 Graz agreement, leading the way to a tripartite division of the country. Is this true? 89.164.228.131 (talk) 10:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Karadordevo agreement

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Croat–Bosniak War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/29027/svedanin-priznao-krivnju-za-ratne-zlocine-u-bih
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/69QfQwNIk?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nacional.hr%2Fen%2Fclanak%2F31294%2Fsusak-handed-over-the-posavina-region to http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/31294/susak-handed-over-the-posavina-region
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/29027/svedanin-priznao-krivnju-za-ratne-zlocine-u-bih
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/69QfQwNIk?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nacional.hr%2Fen%2Fclanak%2F31294%2Fsusak-handed-over-the-posavina-region to http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/31294/susak-handed-over-the-posavina-region
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Croat–Bosniak War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921082128/http://reflexes.samizdat.net/spip.php?article290 to http://reflexes.samizdat.net/spip.php?article290
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/31294/susak-handed-over-the-posavina-region
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified