lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Waveform

message: To match the article to the title, this article is nowhere near general enough. All waveforms should be considered. They are not all signals varying with time. It needs to be totally rewritten - I am sure good sources can be found on the Internet - I suggest textbooks, and they don't need to be modern, as the topic is not modern. When I say all waveforms I do not mean all possible shapes in every medium should be listed. However all waveforms have certain general characteristics such as wavelength, period, amplitude, etc. none of which I see here. If you mean oscilloscope signals or electrical signals then the title and intro should make that clear, but this is all waveforms. I would expect to hear about geometry, repeating patterns and all those good generalities to be found in basic math and physics books or else this article should disappear and suddenly be found under "Oscilloscope signals", "Radio signals" or some such thing.Dave (talk) 00:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. The referenced "definition" is very lacking. Waveforms are generally the result of any sensor as a function of any independent variable. It is common to have waveforms in either the time domain or the frequency domain, but needn't be restricted to that. 73.68.108.105 (talk) 11:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Completeness

message: Excuse me, but the integrand of a square wave is NOT a triangle wave. Rather it is the absolute value of triangle wave.Akilaa (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, it's triangular shaped; is there a relevant definition for the distinction you're making?  Dicklyon (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't think there was any doubt about the definition of waveform.  Maybe of triangular waveform.  Though the original point was silly, since integration has a free offset in general. Dicklyon (talk) 05:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integral of square wave? 

message: There is a problem with the LaTeX code in the second section. This is the text displayed:
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle (t,\lambda) = \operatorname{saw}(t,\lambda) − \operatorname{saw}(t − \frac{\lambda}{2 },\lambda)}  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.138.244.73 (talk) 09:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A problem with the LaTeX code in the page. 

message: I was looking for information on the applications in physics but I could find no reference or relevant links on this page, nor on the disambiguation page, meaning that when one googles the word, no Wikipedia pages about physics appear and there's no obvious way to find one from that search. I've never edited on Wikipedia before and am not confident that I could fix it correctly. Dogface07 (talk) 07:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:NOTLINKFARM for the policy. Constant314 (talk) 07:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No links to the word in regard to physics
Talk:Moulton, Northamptonshire

message: Would be great if we could feature some significant families. I will also dig around for some more history, like where the bomb landed in WW2. Have added the geology but will also put:
*History
*Flora and Fauna
I will also add some more about the demographic
The geography section needs editing as it reads really badly. 
I think the Outline can be divided up in time into a proper outline, commerce, leisure and famous figures....  
Also thinking about a Famous Building Section...
Plugflower (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
File talk:Évolution du prix moyen du thé depuis 1989.jpg

message: Here is the data if someone wants to draw a new graph (maybe I'll do it later):
Year	Price(US cents/kg)
1984	276
1985	186
1986	161
1987	170
1988	160
1989	182
1990	201
1991	159
1992	153
1993	152
1994	140
1995	142
1996	162
1997	200
1998	199
1999	173
2000	180
2001	155
2002	148
2003	149
2004	164
Data taken from fao.org (Figure 6 in ). Jak123 (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data
Talk:Cephalus

message: ==Untitled==
Is Cephalus related in any way to the Greek island town of Kefalos on Kos? k. da-ma-te (talk) 01:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kefalo

message: Is Cephalus related in any way to the Greek island town of Kefalos on Kos? k. da-ma-te (talk) 01:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1. "Some sources also give Tithonos and Hesperus as children of Cephalus and Eos." A source for this is needed.
2. Clymene was the wife of Cephalus and, according to the article on Phylacus, also of Phylacus. Who did she marry first?
ICE77 (talk) 04:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few comments 
Talk:Tithonos

message: Kephalos and Tithonos repeatedly are reported as lovers of Eos, given their unsatisfyable sexual desire just a few among many. However, I never heard and read about the former being the father of the latter. Furthermore, a discrimination by the ending of "-us" and "-os" would be ridiculous, when considering the ubiquitious latinisation of greek endings. I'd rather suggest deletion of this stub and a redirect to "Tithonus". Purgy (talk) 11:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystification?
Talk:Loophole

message: This line:
:Usually these gay but perverted lawyers want us to not find holes so they can fuc them
It has some merit, but it's overly vulgar, and I don't know enough about the subject to say whether it's true or false, and whichever it is, I'm not qualified to ameliorate it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallenangei (talk • contribs) 00:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: It may be worth to link this article to a currently discussed loophole that already has a related article on wikipedia, like gun show loophole for instance  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.5.117 (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Classic. Davez621 (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ford Transit imported from turkey to avoid the chicken tax? 

message: How is CopyLeft related to Loopholes? CopyLeft is just a method of keeping a software "libre" while putting obstacles before anyone trying to claim exclusive rights for that software. It uses the copyright to achieve this, but is in no way trying to violate or walk around copyright. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CopyLeft?

message: "However, the Nunica Internet Social Alliance was founded as a method to exploit a loophole in YouTube's song blocking by making promo videos for freely downloadable MP3 albums from Nisa Records which contain the blocked music, but without the blocked music in the promo videos, in which the albums can be found on underground file hosting sites."
That may make sense if you already know what it is talking about. I think I get it after reading it four times but I think one should be able get it on the first reading. 67.81.216.61 (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Salsalate

message: From article body: 
The research article is in the journal Diabetes Care, available online (not free) here: .Awotter (talk) 04:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved non-free link

message: Please read the article by Jacob Goldstein in the Jan 20, 2009 Wall Street Journal, page A12, in reference to the research underway at the Harvard-affiliated Joslin Diabetes Center. In early studies the drug significantly lowered spikes in blood sugar.  Results warranted a larger NIH supported trial, which is now underway.----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.96.97 (talk) 15:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salsalate may help control blood sugar levels in Type 2 diabetes
Template talk:IPtalk

message: This template was first suggested at Wikipedia:IP talk page proposal and its discussion page. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original proposal

message: Why not provide a clickable link to jump to the end of the page? -- John of Reading (talk) 21:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right! Why not? I'd support this change. Mz7 (talk) 03:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

text: I've requested the protection level lowered to  so that I may process this request and while doing so I was thinking the down arrow which is currently unlinked to anything should point to the bottom of the page too.  —  (t • e • c) 12:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

text: Done —  (t • e • c) 17:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to footer

message: Please replace Category:User talk header templates with  to allow non-template-editors to develop documentation for this template. I have copied the current category over to the /doc page. Please also remove , since the documentation template automatically adds protection categories and icons. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Again, please update the documentation with something more substantial than an empty Usage section. Cabayi (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where this template is used, so I've tagged it with "Improve documentation" --DannyS712 (talk) 18:45, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 23 April 2019 

message: Please change |image =  to |image = . Per MOS:BLANKALT, any image (such as :File:Gtk-go-down.svg) that is not in the public domain needs to link to the image description page to provide the required attribution under their copyright license. :File:Blue down arrow icon with slight gradient.svg is in the public domain. HouseBlastertalk 21:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 10:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 30 September 2023
Talk:The Gallant Hours

message: Having recently watched this film, this article is a long overdue addition.Marcd30319 (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, watching it on TCM was the impulse behind my adding it.  I'm not sure how successful it is as a film, but it certainly is noteworthy, for many reasons.  BTW Thanks for correcting the date on "One, Two, Three" - I don't know where I came up with 1953, must not have had my brain in gear. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 20:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Long Overdue Addition

message: I added this iamge that I found at GunsmokeNet.com.  I think I did all of the fair-use ntofications, but a review may be in order.Marcd30319 (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image:Cagney-TheGallantHours.jpg

message: I wrote a very brief plot summary that provides a high-level overview.  I incorporated several paragraph from the opening into the summary.  I hope this is satisfactory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcd30319 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... I'm not sure.  It's fine the way it is, except that it's really not a "plot summary" per se, more of a description of the film -- and I kind of hate to lose those two descriptive grafs from the lede.  On the other hand, when I was thinking of whether we needed a plot section or not, I really thought it had to be kept quite short, so I like that aspect of it.Let me live with it a bit -- and thanks for your valuable participation, it's really made it possible for the article to get into decent shape much more quickly then I ever expected. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 00:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made one change, making the title of the section "Description". Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 00:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: I added info from James Cagney's autobiography (Cagney by Cagney) an James McCabe's biography Cagney.  I also added info about technical advisors, as well as new sections - Reception, Home Video, and Bibliography.  I hope this is helpful.Marcd30319 (talk) 17:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Additions

message: I guess we'll know that this article has really "arrived" when someone besides you and I edits it! Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 22:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm certainly happy with it. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrival
Talk:List of airlines of the United Kingdom

message: Looking at the list of airlines, there are several gaps especially in the image, IATA code and Call sign boxes, I have found suitable images in the relevant Wikipedia pages of Loganair (replacing an old Flybe franchise photo) and of Wizz Air UK but if anyone could find (or take) an image or knows any data that could fill in the blanks I think this would help the article become more useful. Thameslinkrail (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Will have a look and see if I can add anything, I have updated the Type A listing and will do the Type B listing when I get time but it is at https://www.caa.co.uk/Commercial-industry/Airlines/Licensing/Licence-types/Airline-licence-holders/ MilborneOne (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filling in the blanks 

message: With the formation of EuroFlyer at Gatwick, does NA still operate from Gatwick or is it now entirely based out of Heathrow?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.199.11 (talk) 15:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BA
Talk:Sölvesborg

message: Ryssberget does not lie between Sölvesborg and Karlskrona.
"Ryssberget" is a ridge stretching north-south on the western border of the municipality. The city of Sölvesborg lies south of the ridge. 213.101.56.122 (talk) 05:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error re "Ryssberget"
Talk:Sun Goes Down (David Jordan song)

message: This song reminds me of something.  What is it?  My subconcious keeps flicking on some 70's musical or hymm style tune.
::Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum. Sacharin (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Please sign your comments by using 4 tildes (~). Sacharin (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Chaudhry Zahoor Elahi

message: If Pakistan Gujrat (Panjab) province is his birth place 99% Surety the came from "Zahoor" zamindar Tribe or Caste Of Indian subcontinent . 2405:204:108A:21C6:17BC:1AB0:C0D7:C14F ([[User talk:2405:204:108A:21C6:17BC:1AB0:C0D7:C14F]) 14:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "kaum" <ref></ref> of sir Zahoor Elahi <ref name="undefined" />? 

message: I do not have the expertise on this person to add to this article but wanted to highlight the page needs work. There is some subjective language on the page. I removed a section claiming ownership of edits as this is not appropriate on the article itself 2A01:B340:63:86B1:2550:5319:599:A5A5 (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needing Work
Talk:Permanent makeup/Archive 1

message: User Tatt bratt has provided misleading information and routinely erases information that exposes her agenda with SPCP. She goes out of her way to manipulate information and distort the truth regarding the FDA and the laws regarding Permanent Makeup. She is a schill from SPCP who is under inverstigation and has a pending slander lawsuit against her and sveral other memebers for lies thaey have Blogged about other people in the past
Response to above comments by 76.189.163.253 on January 29, 2008 - There is no agenda other than relating information provided by impartial and reliable sources. Direct links to the FDA site do not "distort truths" - furthermore, user 76.189.163.253 has maliciously diverted links to personally endorsed private companies and even has gone as far as having changed information on a procedural photo someone else has posted. Over the course of the Permanent Makeup page's history, user 76.189.163.253 has been warned many times for improper editing, linking areas to her personal web pages and other acts of vandalism and this should no longer be tolerated.Tatt bratt (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP  above has been blocked for one year for legal threats.  Acroterion (talk) 01:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Further edit warring by any party will result in full protection of the article for a week, at whatever Wrong Version exists at the time.  Acroterion (talk) 04:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit War
Talk:USAHS Blanche F. Sigman

message: The main reference I used, Charles’ Troopships of World War II was published in 1946, which is when the ship’s U.S. Army history ends. I have no knowledge of what the ship did in the interval from April 1946 and when it entered the Reserve Fleet in late 1948. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Sandviken

message: The picture doesn't depict Sandviken, its from "Gästrike-Hammarby" as depicted by the text on the painting [sic].
81.224.169.16 (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved. Aqwis (talk) 14:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Edsbyn

message: I think notch (creator of Minecraft, was born here. Or something. He references it in one of the splashes on the title screen. Worth noting? 68.81.3.103 (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Meusebach–Comanche Treaty

message: The treaty is unique in that it is the only treaty officially recognized by the United States, and the Comanche, which was made between private citizens and the Comanche, yet endorsed by the Government.
Could someone rephrase this so that it makes sense? What exactly is unique about it? That it's the only treaty with the Comanche? The only treaty between an Indian Tribe and private citizens? The only treaty which is between an Indian Tribe and private citizens and which is recognized by the US? Or is it something else? (BTW, the reference originally at the end of the lede (a link, really) does not talk about the uniqueness at all. I moved it up a sentence, to where it is more applicable.) -- 00:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, it is unique in that it is the only treaty which is between an Indian Tribe and private citizens and which is recognized by the US. JohninMaryland (talk) 13:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique? 
Talk:Hammarstrand

message: In 1985, I slid in the World Luge Championships on the Hammastrand track.  It was physically demanding yet fun for me. We always said if you missed "Ding" (the curve) you'd get "Donged" (the following curve).  Tim Nardiello and I slid together in doubles for this one race as my regular doubles partner was not with me.  Tim and I tipped on our sides through one curve, slid that way through the whole curve and then miraculously were projected such that we landed on upright in perfect sliding position.  We felt great about that run.  The final run of competion did not go so well.  We got donged and slid to just short of the uphill finish line.  We then picked up the sled and walked through the finish both touching the sled so that we would not be disqualified.  The people of Sweden were great host and it was a memorable race. - Frank Masley  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.144.77 (talk) 19:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Coverage

message: As I see it, the consensus seems to be not to include the Republic of Ireland, though there doesn't seem to be any dissent about the Channel Islands and Isle of Man, though it should be made clear that these are not part of the UK. If people are happy with this, I'll close this discussion off shortly. Tivedshambo (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is worth reminding editors that the name: the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK) only dates to the mid 1920s, before that it was the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, also the UK.  I understand the political dimension; but when we are considering the construction of most of our current railways, from the 1830s onwards, they were built within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. Again I understand the wish not to include these within the scope of UK railways. The railway companies also ran shipping services, which have all been privatised, and we will at some time cover them from a historical perspective. Thus railway shipping services which nowadays would fall into the scope of the Republic of Ireland may also fall within the scope of the UK railways; and it would seem sensible to include them where necessary.Pyrotec (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:1884 Providence Grays season

message: The player stats seem like they must be incomplete.  For example, in addition to his all time record setting performance as a starter, Charles Radbourn pitched at least one game in relief.  He relieved Cyclone Miller, pitching four innings in relief and earning (at least by modern scoring rules) a save.  There is no mention, however, of his relief performance under "Relief pitchers".  Also, although I'm sure complete games were much more common in 1884 than today, it seems implausible based on the "innings pitched" numbers of the starters other than Radbourn that relief pitchers made appearances in only two (or three) games.  The total number of games played by the Grays (according to the standings) was 112 but the total number of games played by the starting pitchers (according to their stats) was 120--something literally doesn't quite add up there.  Plus there is no mention of batting statistics for any of the pitchers--presumably Radbourn in particular batted almost as much as the position players given his number of games played and the fact that this was long, long before the designated hitter.  Dash77 (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player stats
Talk:Io

message: A comment on the suggestion that the article Io be merged with the article IO: I personally feel that the list of Io names that are not acronyms should perhaps stay as they are under Io. Any items listed on the Io page which are acronyms should definitely go onto the IO page.  Anyone else have an opinion? Invertzoo (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that they should be separate pages. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

text: I disagree; the average user is unlikely to expect Wikipedia to be sensitive to such minute changes. -- Jfeen (talk) - 15:53, 04 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Invertzoo, seeing "Io (moon)" near the end was a bit odd, I expected "io" to go straight there, with a link to a disambig page.  Also, JFeen, each disamb page can link to the other at the top. Huw Powell (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Agreed.  I suspect the moon is the primary topic for Io, so that we really just need an otheruses template leading to a disambiguation page.  All the dablinks have been cleared at this point, so there is no immediate evidence to back this up.  If anyone else checks for future dablinks for Io, I'd be interested to get their feedback on the results.--Kubigula (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Am I just blind?  -GoatLordServant(Talk-Contribs) 00:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's honestly quite difficult to search for because of that underscore, but I think there's no wiki article for this person. You could always request one at WP:REQ if you think they are notable. -- Fyrael (talk) 06:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found out someone else commented here, oh well. I_o is listed on the article mau5trap as deceased. But spending more time with how editors handled the list it turns out the only people with disambiguation mentions are the ones with articles.  -GoatLordServant(Talk-Contribs) 13:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the producer I_o? 
Talk:Mission Raceway Park

message: Could anyone write up the Motocross Track history? Perhaps even mention the things that have been filmed there, including at least one Honda commercial that I know of.  Greg Salter (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motocross Track History 