lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alexander of Pherae

message: If Alexander of Pherae ruled 369-358, how could he be murdered in 367?
Cary Cook (talk) 22:32, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The date was corrected less than a day after the above was posted. It is generally considered to be desirable to post a reply telling someone that an error was corrected. That way future editors don't need to address the error. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Murder of Alexander of Pherae
Talk:Riah Abu El-Assal

message: I have restored the category  to the category. He is an Israeli citizen. There is no reason why he could not be categorized as both Palestinian and Israeli. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Ric Charlesworth

message: Ric Charlesworth said he left politics because he never became a minister. I remember clearly from an ABC News report back in 1993 so it is very hard to find any online source that has him making that very statement.
The ABC would not assist in the editing of Wikipedia articles so don't expect any help from them in providing a source on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.167.151 (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This interview is very informative about his lack of personal life.  And this also says he found politics stimulating but hell on his private life.  Had he become a minister, what little personal life he still had would have been reduced to zero.  Apparently he devoted an entire chapter in his memoir to this issue. --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 08:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why he left politics
Talk:Ricardo Arona

message: I can't remove it because of the webpage lagging out but that who is without merit.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stosseled (talk • contribs) 14:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove that {who?}

message: Article doesn't cite references, needs editing to maintain NPOV and also needs event links to be correctly wikified --- Trench 01:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up required
Talk:Ricardo Asch

message: A baby was born in the US from a frozen fertilized embryo which had been processed through the fertility clinic of the University of California, Irvine Center, 13 years ago. The embryo and others had been sent to a US east coast university for experimentation and retrieved recently. As Dr. Asch was their fertility doctor in the 1990's, I would think that this information would improve the article. Possibly, some editor could work it into the article. The news article can be found at the BBC website  here. --TGC55 (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 years later a baby is born
Talk:Ricardo Cabanas

message: Forced to retire early from international play?  How come he played today?  Cfrydj (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: International
Talk:Ricardo Vidal

message: Just a comment, the latin phrase should read VIAM VERITATIS ELEGI. In its current form in English, it reads I choose way truth. If the last words should read 'of truth', veritas should be changed to veritatis.--Jondel (talk) 13:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin insignia 

message: This article has been reassessed as a C-class article. Capitalistroadster (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reclassified as a C-class article
Talk:Ricardo de la Espriella

message: Much of this needs to be referenced.  We need to state who claims these things. RJFJR (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: * Reason : Clean up tag s 2 years old.
* More precise and recent tags.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilane (talk • contribs) 00:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag suppresse
Talk:Ricardo Martinelli

message: The Univision website that's a cited source here states (and it is parroting Martinelli's campaign website while doing so):
:Actualmente es presidente de la Importadora Ricamar, de la cadena local de Supermercados 99, de la Junta Directiva de la Central Azucarera La Victoria, de la empresa ERA y de la fábrica de plásticos Plastigol.
Can a knowledgeable person weed out the fluff and state in the article which of these are the important ones?  How is it that he runs 5 companies?  Article currently also says he's chairman of the board of Super 99, not the president.  Tempshill (talk) 03:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  His positions in private enterprise 

message: I removed the sentence "Since taking office in 2009, Ricardo Martinelli and his Administration have initiated a series of economic reforms and major infrastructure investments that have turned the economy into a regional leader, attracted major foreign direct investment, improved Panama’s fiscal position, and laid the groundwork for continued long-term growth.", since it didn't appear supported by the given source. S&P speaks well of Panama's financial position, but doesn't give any credit to Martinelli; rather, it speaks of Panama's growth as a continuing trend. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic claims 

message: Where has the court case got to ?
And I just saw on TV in Panama an ad for him as "alcalde" (mayor). -- Beardo (talk) 21:38, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating 

message: He is a convicted criminal now as his last appeal to reverse his 128 month prison sentence has been denied. Also the article mixes foreign reliable sources with questionable sources which seems to support a favorable view of him. His article in Spanish is more critical of him and I'm reluctant to edit this article because I am not neutral about this Pancho507 (talk) 02:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to talk about his scandals
Talk:Ricardo Medina Jr.

message: I just checked the Hollywood Men site and Ricardo Medina Jr. is not in the lineup. If there was a source as to who or what said he was part of their cast, I'd like it cited. Otherwise, this bit of information needs to be removed. 72.197.0.102 (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollywood Men Source 

message: "(...) stabbing his roommate, which caused his death." sounds weird. imo it should be changed to something like: "(...) stabbing his roommate, fatally injuring him" --92.193.14.125 (talk) 06:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  wording 

message: The other former PR actors who have been involved in murders (one an 'uncredited extra", the other not even named) have no reason to be in the 'personal life' section.  I would remove, but it's locked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.197.19.241 (talk • contribs) 
:I locked it yesterday because I was worried people were going to start adding unsubstantiated rumors, but since editing today has been responsible, I will remove article protection. Gamaliel (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the IP and have removed the "material" for now. --Malerooster (talk) 05:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of other actor murders not relevant
Talk:Via Anelli Wall

message: First of all, sorry for my bad english; I live in Padua and this wall is not considerable something similar to the Berlin Wall; they built it trying to block the access of a lot of drug dealers in via Anelli, that today is famous in Italy for the extreme high crime rate of the last years. The wall has not closed the ordinary access to via anelli, it has only closed the only way to enter in via Anelli without passing the police control, and it's an emergency solution. I believe it is not an argument for an encyclopedia (it's not an important fact), better a Via Anelli article however, and it's very POV. --piero tasso 01:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have just been copy editing this article, and it strikes me as factual in content and neutral in tone. (That did not apply to the first versions.) I’m therefore removing the POV tag. Hope that’s ok with everyone. —Ian Spackman 15:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV problems seem to have been edited out
Talk:Ricardo (footballer, born 1976)

message: As I wrote on the Portuguese National Team talk page, I only ask that Mr. Rocha respects that others might have a different opinion. He claims that the admission by Ricardo Carvalho that he touched Henry is proof that it was a foul - even if the touch was never enough to trip Henry, or to stop him from getting to the ball. But then he insists that another touch, Cristiano Ronaldo being pushed from behind and changing trajectory in middle jump, is just a dive. Besides the contradicting views, that is his opinion, and also (unfortunately) the opinion of the referee of the game. It isn't mine, and it isn't the opinion of most Portuguese supporters (and even other nationals have admitted both are disputed).
I mostly don't agree with Mr. Rocha imposing his opinion as the ultimate truth, and not admitting he doesn't own the truth, he is just expressing his views.
Also, about his attacks on my anonymous posting, I didn't know it had been forbidden in Wikipedia's charter. After all, it's very easy to know my ip, so it isn't truly anonymous (even if this IP is being used by over a 1000 others).
I also present my apologies on the couple of attacks I did above, even though they were provoked by his attacks in the history page and later here, I should have known better than to descend to that level. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.234.134.115 (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I replied to Mr. Anonymous is Talk:Portugal national football team. --Explendido Rocha 16:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I answered Mr. Rocha claims in Talk:Portugal national football team. 195.234.134.115 16:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Protection

message: This could be miles off the mark but did Ricardo actually score a goal while playing for Portugal? I sincerely hope this was no referring to the penalty he scored against England which, of course, was in a penalty shootout. The page about 'goalscoring goalkeepers' only claims he scored a goal for one of his club sides and a quick internet search turned up nothing. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit was done by Udaymanju239 not too long ago. I've undid his revision. Wolcott (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goal scored for Portugal
Talk:Ricardo Rosset

message: Rosset's team-mate in the Brazilian GT3 Championship IS Walter Salles the film director, not Gualter Salles. There's a photo of Salles on the GT3 website here  and there are many references to it in race reports etc. Forix also has racing driver Salles' birthdate matching that of the film-maker. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Salles

message: I've removed the "DNP" from this, because (a) there was no pre-qualifying in 1997; (b) Rosset is not shown on the entry list - Lola had withdrawn from the championship. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazil 1997 

message: "In 1998, Rosset was chosen by Craig Pollock to be Tyrrell's second driver, to the fury of Ken Tyrrell, whose choice was, ironically, Verstappen."
How is that ironic?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.213.39 (talk) 21:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't. Fixed, thanks for the heads up. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyrrell
Talk:Ricardo Salinas Pliego

message: This article strikes me as extremely biased, I'm gonna remove a lot of unsourced comments and try to add a very much needed criticism section. Solid Reign 15:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Ricardo Vaz Tê

message: His name is Ricardo Vaz Tê, not "Té", as you can confirm here:
http://pt.uefa.com/footballeurope/news/kind=16/newsid=419235.html
Could someone please change the title of this article?
:Will do Spiderone 16:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title is wrong 
Talk:Ricardo Virtuoso

message: Ricardo Virtuoso is his given name. Guarà is his Brazilian soccer nickname.
MitchStein 21:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guarà
Talk:Riccardo Cocciante

message: The official SonyBMG Masterworks discography link for this artist is as follows
*Discography at SonyBMG Masterworks
It (in most cases) contains a full listing of in-print CDs released on the SonyBMG labels within the US (for the moment), along with track listings and in some cases audio clips (which will become more robust in the new year).  Ecommerce links are provided inobtrusively.
I have been informed that it creates a conflict of interest to post these links directly from my account, so please consider adding the page to the link section.  Thanks.
Softlord 23:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Rich Alexis

message: Please note that per WP:BLP biographies of living persons must be sourced. Please do not remove the refimproveBLP tag until this article is correctly sourced. Thank you -- Alexandr Dmitri (Александр Дмитрий) (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing biographies of living persons (BLP)
Talk:E.Town Concrete

message: Rapcore: "Rapcore is a musical genre that fuses the instrumentations and the vocal elements of punk, heavy metal, hip hop, and sometimes of funk." It's a compromise. By the way, E.Town Concrete have also called themselves "metal."   Jon138 01:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits (8-18-06)
Talk:Rich Eisen

message: Seems to me that this incident belongs on Alycia Lane, but not here, since Eisen isn't suspected of doing anything wrong (or doing anything at all), whereas including the text here implies that he was involved. I move for removal. Any objections? | Mr. Darcy talk 02:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been six days with no response, so I'm going to remove the content. | Mr. Darcy talk 21:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alycia Lane incident

message: According to Rich Eisen's bio on NFL.com, he was the FIRST on-air talent hired at the NFL network, not the fourth as the wiki describes.  [Source: http://www.nfl.com/news/author?id=09000d5d8017d0ff&fullName=Rich%20Eisen] 
--Griffon4 19:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to his bio 
Talk:Rich Lowry

message: Work section has this uncited line "Lowry frequently speaks on the topics of American exceptionalism and the future of the Republican Party."   This should be a very easy citation to find.   Right this sentence out of place, or simply not true.   I won't delete it immediately, but I do believe it should either be deleted or supported. I found no cite to support it as written 99.100.16.236 (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of citation 

message: Or at least cut the fluff: as in: "Lowry has been broadly critical of U.S. President Donald Trump,  In the summer of 2017, when Trump criticized  the performance of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Lowry defended Sessions and assailed the president’s lack of “gratitude” toward his long-standing campaign supporter.  Orthotox (talk) 20:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ditch the last paragraph 

message: Missing most of his basic biographical information, particularly to include race/ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation.2605:6000:6947:AB00:49D2:79EC:1362:5C96 (talk) 21:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rich Lowry's Biographical Information 

message: Is there any source or reference for reversing the edit to list him as a slavery apologist? Mastersoftext (talk) 19:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no mention of slavery or being an apologist for it in the article. The lead should summarize the article. Schazjmd (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the edit to remove slavery apologist? 

message: The phrasing of "restrict voter rights" may be a POV issue. In any event, there was a series of edits and reverts on the phrasing, so I think that it should be discussed in the talk page. I think that we should include the info, but not describe the bill in Wikipedia's voice as restricting voting rights. We don't describe it as such in Wikipedia's voice on the Election Integrity Act of 2021 article, rather we describe it as a "Georgia law overhauling elections in the state." If it is inappropriate to describe it with such inflammatory language in Wikipedia's voice on an article about it, it is inappropriate in an article about a living person supporting it. Furthermore, the source used doesn't even go that far with the description. The closest it comes on its own terms other than when quoting or paraphrasing others is when it says that it is a "voter restriction law", not a "voter rights restriction law".JMM12345 (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible POV issues with "Georgia to restrict voting rights"
Talk:Sam Slom

message: I accidentally saved the page when it just contained "Sam Slom."  I have more information; he's an important Hawaii politician.--Papertrail 01:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then start adding it. The page looked abandoned, and I figured you could always recreate when you got back to it. Fan-1967 01:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Sam Slom, party of one in Hawaii’s Senate, Los Angeles Times
Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Rich Rosen

message: I am Bill Jefferys. I corresponded with Rich Rosen about his quotation to get permission to use it in our book, and I am sure that the correspondence gave the quote exactly as it was given in the book, "Discovering Astronomy," by myself and Bob Robbins. Rich Rosen gave permission to use the quote as it was published in our book. 
I do not know who wrote the footnote above. It may be Rich, and it may be someone else. If it was written by Rich, it has a significant claim to truth. 
How to explain the discrepancy?
It's possible that I misquoted him (but my recollection is that I copied the quote directly out of one of his postings and copied it directly into the manuscript from our correspondence).
It's possible that he used more than one version of the quote in his signature line (Rich would know whether this is true or false).
It's possible that I misquoted him but he didn't notice the misquotation in our correspondence. 
Maybe something else.
Rich, if you are watching this page, can you comment? The correspondence is very, very old and I am no longer in possession of the paperwork on copyright and other permissions for the book as I have not been involved in the project for many years. 
But, I do know who is currently in charge of the book, and if you wish, Rich, I can let them know and have them fix the problem in the next edition. Bill Jefferys (talk)
: Bill, nice to hear from you! I do recall (as a distant memory) our email discussions about using my "Anything's possible" signature line in one of the chapter introductions in your book. My recollection is that our communications all referred to this wording, which I used exclusively in that signature line, all the way through to the very end. When you sent me a comp copy of the book, I noticed the change to "Many things are possible...". I just assumed it was an editorial change initiated by your publisher. (Having just gone through the process of reviewing and tweaking final proofs over the past few months for the second edition of the Web Application Architecture book, I am very familiar with what can go wrong during that phase of publication.) I was just happy to be referenced in a published book, I thought it was very cool, and I do recall saying to you, repurposing an Oscar Wilde "joke template", that "there is one thing better than being quoted -- being misquoted". :-)  
:Assuming it is within your power and not too much trouble, if you can correct the quotation, that would be great and would be appreciated. Nice to hear that Discovering Astronomy is still going strong. Hope you're doing well. Again, nice to hear from you! But at this point we should probably take further discussion off of Wikpedia discussions pages. Feel free to shoot me an email! :-) Rich Rosen (talk) 13:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misquoted
Talk:Richard A. Knaak

message: I notice that it isn't listed, but Knaak was also the translator/rewriter for Ragnarok (manhwa). -- Jelly Soup (talk) 21:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ragnarok

message: Bestselling how?  What list?  This description needs to be removed unless it can be cited.  I seriously doubt any of Knaak's dragonlance novels were actually bestselling on any list whatsoever. --DuTempete (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bestselling"
Talk:Richard A. Tapia

message: Why is the link to the (excellent!) Tapia biography (at http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Printonly/Tapia.html) placed as an un-numbered bullet under "References"?  Shouldn't it be listed under "External Links"?  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 08:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced Reference? 

message: The first edit of 16:25, 29 September 2008 was some bogus vandalism (adding "HE IS A BIOTCH", with no pretense of correctness or reasonableness).  The second edit (shown in the history with the same date and time) removed that addition, but it also damaged the entry for "B.A." under "Education", by removing 3 of the 4 digits of the year ["1961"], and by also removing the name of the major field, ["(Mathematics)"].  The best way to correct this damage is easy to figure out, and I intend to edit the article soon, to fix it.  However, the explanation given here might be too long to fit in the edit summary [comments] allowed, so my "edit summary" comments will instead just refer to this "Talk" page entry.  One can then refer to the history, for details about what changed when.  Thank you.  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 07:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The above described edit (to repair the damage) has now been done;  hence the little "check mark" icon, (saying "Resolved.") [has been inserted] above.   "case closed"  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 07:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  damage to entry for "B.A." under "Education" 

message: This strikes me at spam. References??? Sdkb (talk) 07:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drag racing??? 
Talk:Richard Anderson

message: Was this guy in Rawhide (TV series)? 71.63.88.166 17:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to IMDB, which is surprising since practically every other character actor of that era did appear on Rawhide at one time or another. - Mark Dixon (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rawhide

message: Does anybody have enough data to build a Personal Life section?  I seem to half-recall that he has mid-west American Native heritage.  Can anybody confirm that and build on it? Nutster (talk) 01:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life section? 

message: The linked J. B. Earle had died in 1836.
So he cant be the Captain USN, who rejected the Ward report. December 7th 1941.
--88.153.184.211 (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch - fixed. Ckruschke (talk) 19:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Link 