Talk:Zombie (computing)

message: :: As a master of self-promotion, and probably inclined to invent things out of thin air, I ask you to remove his mention in this article.  Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.13.93.97 (talk • contribs) 
:I don't necessarily disagree with your opinion of Gibson, but the Wiki NPOV policy seems to prohibit removing him just for that. The fact remains, that the attack on his site is an excellent illustration of this phenom. I say he stays, but will reread it and see if there's some kind bias indicated in the text. P.S. Suggestion: please sign your comments with ~~~~, okay? ;) --David Spalding Talk, Contribs 20:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Gibson 

message: The user who wrote the "user-friendly" paragraphs added this, which ought to go on the talk page and not the article:
Also, I know that someone is going to edit this because it's not very technical, but please leave a some kind of simplified version so that normal people can understand it. My computer at work was just compromised in this way and I couldn't find much help on this subject at all. Please bear in mind that I am very computer-literate, and my husband is a network administrator. So if it's not simple enough for me, then millions of people are not going to understand what's written above what I've written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.139.226.37 (talk) 08:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "For those of you who don't speak Technicalese..." 

message: This sentence:
In order to become infected, these computers need to be running the Microsoft Windows operating system. Other operating systems are not affected.
I think it should be removed (or substituted with a more NPOV one, althought also i think that's easier to zombify a windows system than others)...
I also see that a similar issue happened in this article...
If the problem is the verifiability i think that articles like this should prove that linux-zombie exists (to me it's obvious, since linux-rootkits exists)...
I myself won't modify the article since:
1-I've never modified an article nor readed carefully wikipedia's FAQ until now
2-I'd prefer create an account before that
3-English isn't my motherlanguage... actually dunno if it's so evident...
87.4.79.76 (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  zombie==windows??? 

message: In the episode 'Traitor' of Blakes Seven (which can be found here [ http://www.hermit.org/blakes7/Episodes/scripts/Traitor.html]) the section begining 'Communications HQ - The terminal screen comes to life. The Tracer is watching it'. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: First example of a zombie computer?

message: It should be mentioned somewhere in the History section that the main reason zombies avoid detection is that the zombie virus does not change what a computer it infects does and only affects the messages that computer sends out making the owner unaware of the zombie virus in their own computer, thus preventing them from reporting the virus. Blackbombchu (talk) 20:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information about how zombies work 

message: Another (and older) meaning in computer science is a process that has terminated but is still hanging around because it holds deadlocked resources, or owns resources held by another component (like a driver) that's deadlocked or otherwise hung.
In UNIX a zombie process can also be created if the init process has died, because init is responsible for the final cleanup of orphan processes. -- Resuna (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 

message: let's talk seriously i am part of the hacking world i'm on a trojan horse type zombie botnet whatever you want to call it computer right now! there's not much more i can say about it except the fact that i've read all about these things i've seen pictures of them on youtube and google and what else would these things be don't worry i know all about them i know how they operate it's just too bad the police can't spot these things they're cleverly disguised! sometimes i wonder what it would be like to be the botmaster here! instead of always on this end in front of the machine typing and reading i'm so used to it i find it rather funny you know? it's like i've been especially designed to babysit these machines now because i can. oh well such is life eh? thank you for listening, don50.67.165.106 (talk) 20:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  zombie computers 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Zombie (computer science). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061230152432/http://www.vnunet.com:80/vnunet/news/2144375/botnet-operation-ruled-million to http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2144375/botnet-operation-ruled-million
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091024033302/http://www.blackberrycool.com:80/2009/07/16/smobile-systems-release-solution-for-etisalat-blackberry-spyware/ to http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/07/16/smobile-systems-release-solution-for-etisalat-blackberry-spyware/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There should be an article on Compromised Systems, with Zombie being a specific sub-class of said.  Don't have time at the moment to make even a stub, so putting the suggestion out in case somebody wants to run with it.  172.58.46.253 (talk) 07:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should have article on Compromised Systems