Talk:List of Ben 10 (2005 TV series) episodes/Archive 1

message: Please wait until the day an episode airs to make a recap page for it. Otherwise, the page will simply be deleted shortly after its creation. - Someguy0830 23:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I'll wait. Thanks someguy. Arukun14 07:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't be able to watch the episode for another few hours, so there's only a basic recap up. It's accuracy is suspect, since I basically gathered it from various spoilers. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 23:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making episode recap pages 

message: The article has been redesigned with a new layout. Arukun14 14:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks better now, but it invalidated all the specific section links in the main article. They've been removed. - Someguy0830 03:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: It'd be better if they were real infoboxes. Have to find the form for making one. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 02:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

text: And now that's done. The template is here:  Template:Infobox Ben 10 episode. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 04:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Modified it slightly. Couldn't figure out what the point of the border code was for. Removing it made it look nicer. - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 04:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redesign 

message: I think wiki should add the ben10 eposodes here incase you missed it on TV.
:No. That's a copyright violation. If you want to download the episodes, do as others do and take the time and effort to track them down. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The shows should be added 

message: What? In Big Tick for ghostfreaks attack on the big tick you see his back and you can tell that he is showing the big tick his true form Djf2014 15:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, those were his tentacles from Last Laugh. look at a rerun and look more closly, bec Not even ben knew about ghostfreak's true form, and that was his front, period.Dark Duelist 5000 15:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Tick 

message: Who the heck wrote the summary for that episode? You shouldn't post your own opinions in an encyclopedia. Could someone give it an actual summary? I'd do it but there are propably hundreds out there who could do it better.
:It's just vandalism. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back with a Vengeance Summary 

message: Does this seem unnecessary to anyone else? The show's of no special significance- not to insult it, I simply think that this article alone is enough. As I believe has been mentioned before, Wikipedia isn't really the place for complete episode recaps- these would be more appropriate on a site like TV.com. --Tozoku 21:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Plenty of precedent. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Plenty of shows have an entry per episode. You should take this up with WikiProject Television and see what response you get. Pacific Coast Highway {Gobble Gobble! • Happy Thanksgiving! • WP:NYCS} 22:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An article for every episode? 

message: I've created appropriate screenshots for each individual episode. I hope they are OK. Arukun14 06:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode screenshots 

message: Did anyone else notice the almost scary resemblance of the 3 grandchildren at the end of the Christmas episode to Konohamaru, Moegi, and Udon from Naruto? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konohamaru —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.91.155.164 (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto in Ben 10 

message: Who changed the old layout to this one?The old one was WAY better.84.195.156.68 20:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the Wiki wizard, a wonderful mage who goes from page to page standardizing layouts. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who... 

message: Where did this information come from? Sorry for the shortness of this message. Zyborg
:Confirmation of a new season came from one of the voice actors for the show. However, I'm finding no sources for the types of aliens being introduced. I'm adding a cite tag to it. -- Jelly Soup 10:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 4? 

message: Who do you think will be the next main villian for season 4? Superlogan7437 23:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird... I never seen a network release an episode in the next season in Canada before it airs in the US... Did you actually watch these episodes? --PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 14:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's lying. No such thing has been said. Xylene is a good guy (gal) at that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 15:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Excuse Me, what I meant was who would be the main villian for season 4. such as Vilgax for season 1 , Kevin 11 for season 2, and Ghostfreak for season 3. I predict the Forever Knights will be involved. Superlogan7437 23:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah. I'm fairly confident that the Forever Knights will take to the stage, especially after his last sentence thus far; however, I would not be surprised if Vilgax was brought up again. Er, is this the best place to discuss this, though? You Can't See Me! 21:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we were talking about the comments below your comment, the one that starts with "(spoilers ahead) i went [...]", not yours, Superlogan7437. By the way, just to remind you, (I'm really sorry if I seem snobyish in the following sentences, I don't mean to) Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.--PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Villian for season 4? 

message: THE ORGANIZATION!  Oh, I just can't help but cross my fingers on that idea.  They are one of the most direct, clear, and enigmatic villans in the Ben 10 series.  I have sggested that they should already be listed as mains given their existing history.  I think they deserve it.  Too big not to be.  But, others don't agree with the idea at this time.  Given past examples, it's possible. In both follow-up seasons, the MAIN VILLIAN has been shown to be an already established villian from a previous season.
* Since there was no season before season 1, Vilgax took on the MAIN VILLIAN station from the very begining.  Also in season 1, an single episode was set to introduce KEVIN as a villian; the episode even featured a short epilouge to indicate that there was a probalility that he would reapear.
* As implied in his original appearance, KEVIN did resurface in season 2 to be a significant factor.  So significant, that he is classified as the MAIN VILLIAN of season 2.  Also in season 2, GHOSTFREAK was introduced as a seperate entity from Ben and as a new (after a fashion) villian.  He was shown as a villian with designs and intent.  Unlike Kevin's intro, this episode gave the impression that he was killed at the end -- but....
* it would be revealed in season 3 that he was only seriously injured -- much like Voldemort during Harry Potter's first 4 books.  A pair of new aliens were introduced in seperate episodes.  With no apparent conection, a third villian would appear later on to be working with them under the orders of GHOSTFREAK.  This showed that GHOSTFREAK was the main villian of season 3.
And in season 3, THE ORGANIZATION was shown to have in progress a series of operations in work all for the purpose of world domination  So, it is possible that they will be brought to the center ring with what is hinted to be the series final season. --Jason Palpatine 08:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. I'm fairly confident that the Forever Knights will take to the stage, especially after his last sentence thus far; however, I would not be surprised if Vilgax was brought up again. Er, is this the best place to discuss this, though? You Can't See Me! 21:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''THE ORGANIZATION''

message: ::No, we were talking about the comments below your comment, the one that starts with "(spoilers ahead) i went [...]", not yours, Superlogan7437. By the way, just to remind you, (I'm really sorry if I seem snobyish in the following sentences, I don't mean to) Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.--PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 21:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More discussion

message: Yes, yes, Megan stated that there will be a fourth season. HOWEVER, I see nothing on the posted link (or anywhere else on the internet short of this article) that states there will be mole, angel or pirate aliens. THAT is what is being marked for citation. -- Jelly Soup 01:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't revert cause of that. There was a revert war over an image. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 01:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't pointing fingers. I just didn't want there to be any confusion over what was being cited. Sorry if it seemed otherwise. -- Jelly Soup 01:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it entirely. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: It seemed that way from your edit summary, but ok. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 01:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Felt I should mention it anyway. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that was directed at Jelly Soup. Not towards you. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 01:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless, problem solved. Good game. -- Jelly Soup 02:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: Ignoring the fact that it's a screenshot from an episode that has already aired, what is the damn problem? Taking a look at the history, it seems that some random user said "My image, lol!" without linking to a source or showing any proof. Thoughts? -- 69.233.222.102 03:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If I don't see some proof as to the 'ownership' of the image in question, I'm going to readd it. Removal will result in me calling for mediation. -- Jelly Soup 08:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the image in question is from ben10toys.net. While the image is still just a  screenshot, I guess it is their image. -- Jelly Soup 04:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stolen Image 

message: Somebody put that there would be 4 new aliens in Season 4: a Megawhatt, an angel, a digging thing, and a pirate-themed alien.  I think that may have just been  vandalism (especially the pirate thing), but if not, why was it deleted?  Dodo man 1 20:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The information could not be verified. An internet search brought up nothing but links to this article, and wikipedia can't be it's own source. -- Jelly Soup 04:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 4 Aliens 

message: Can any one tell me about the eposoid I only saw the last 5 min. of it
:you have to read the short summary, because we cant give you a full summary on the episode here. that makes no sense. Besides, Wikipedia is not a Summary about episodes, if you want that, go to TV.com and find a summary on Ghost Freaked out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thunder The Hedgehog (talk • contribs).
Why did Ghostfreak take off the protective layer of his skin if he could be protected in it. He could have succeded in sunlight or not.141.155.170.124 20:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a forum. You Can't See Me! 01:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Freak out 

message: Ben 10,000 is listed as 302 here, but in it's article it is listed as 301.
Midnight Madness is listed as 301 here and in it's article.
Witch one is is 301? I guessing it's Midnight Madness as it's not uncommon for episodes to be aired out of order, but I don't want to change something on a hunch. Where are the production codes found anyway? --Bobby D. DS. 19:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense.  After all, Washington BC is listed as production number 102 but I understand it actually was the first episode made.  --Jason Palpatine 02:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production code 302 

message: In that episode, Max was kidnapped and couldn't he use his Plumber Equipment?141.155.170.124 20:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limax Episode Notes/Goofs 

message: the article no images
Example::image:Ben10 ep01 image.jpg image no article and :image:UpchuckAlien.jpg —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.34.12.151 (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first image was for the episode summaries, but we don't have those anymore, so the image is no longer needed. The second image is being used on the Omnitrix page. I don't see the problem. -- Jelly Soup 22:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no images 

message: I gotta ask:  Comcast lists this episode as #1, implying that "Washington B.C." is the series pilot.  Does anyone know anything about this?  --Jason Palpatine 16:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is strange... Could it have been produced first but aired second? That's the only explanation I can come up with... You Can't See Me! 22:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a common occurance.  Most networks want to see an in series episode, instead of an origin ep as pilot.  There were many cases where an origin pilot made a good stand alone, but the series then was a flop.  For example: The Man from Atlantis.  --Jason Palpatine 00:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''''"Washington B.C."''''' 

message: Is there going to be new episodes in summer? --Naruto134 00:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it was stated that we would be looking at a fall season. -- Jelly Soup 07:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm losing my patience. These new episodes better come soon. I can't wait any longer! --Naruto134 00:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as I thought, the Forever Knights are going to be the main villains of season four. I knew it! --Naruto134 00:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New episodes in Summer? 

message: Okay, it was BAD ENOUGH to take away the eppies' own page, it could have ended there, but nooooo, its too much fun torturing those without cable and can't watch the episodes, so you take the pictures too, huh?! --Xlr8 the Hedgehog 00:00 02 June 2007 (UTC)
:www.ben-10.com, click on download. Happy? -- Jelly Soup 16:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All the pictures are non-free, and Wikipedia only uses non-free pictures when it has to. --Phirazo 06:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and I totally agree, but how would we get free images for a television show? --PostScript (info/talk/contribs) 13:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO PICS?!!?!?!?!!?!?!?!!??!! 

message: A couple months ago (before User:TTN started redirecting episode article) I shortened the first season down to a sentence or two, since I felt the summaries given were to long and a bit rambling.  I think the rest of these should be shortened this much, but since User:TTN's redirects seem to be standing, how much detail should this go into? --Phirazo 16:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a difficult question due to Ben 10's Villain of the Week format. I'd say only the most important parts of episodes that contain multi-episode plots. Then again, that's what I attempted when I rewrote a lot of those episode summaries, so perhaps I'm not the best person to decide. Still, I think a sentence or two is too short since the episode articles don't exist anymore. You Can't See Me! 23:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Most of the monster of the week episodes can go down to one or two sentences. ("Ben must battle an evil clown.", for example)  The more important ones could be a few sentences, at best. --Phirazo 00:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  These summaries are a bit rambling 

message: in ben 10000 who is exo-skull? 81.108.233.59 17:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ben 10000 

message: These two users Indricula and Komodo Rhino keep reviving the season four episode pages that were redirected by me and Someguy0830 that were recently made by Komodo Rhino. Can someone block these two users or delete the episode pages so this ends? Don't they understand that there are no more episode pages? --Naruto134 14:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they need more information, this is better achieved by expanding the article, not removing templates and adding trivia to pages that are nothing more than summaries. Lucky number 49 02:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Season Four episode pages 

message: can anybody tell me when is the new episode of Divided We Stand, beacause I missed it. (Master King 11:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: sunday at 10 am 71.206.136.69 19:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Airdate 

message: someone has added a lot of new episodes to the series 4 part of the table without any sources, should i revert?--Lerdthenerd 14:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check episode 49. The world's hungriest paperweight 19:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I doubt it'll happen again. If it does then maybe. But for now let's not. After all, there will be a new episode this saturday. The world's hungriest paperweight 15:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  major vandalism? 

message: I'm kind of confused now. Do we use the US airdate, the UK airdate, or the earliest date, no matter the country? I always thought we went by US dates. Pacific Coast Highway {Trick • or treat!} 16:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the moment, I just had them up so the IPs would stop adding them constantly. I'll switch once CN dates come along. — Someguy0830 (T | C)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it seems they're being removed constantly. I wanted to suggest the it would be noted that the dates were for the UK, but that would be too drawn out. Pacific Coast Highway {talk • contribs} 03:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone's a critic: if it's not trying to add them, it's trying to delete them. Hopefully, they'll get back to airing the episodes once the live-action film hits, then this nonsense can stop. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK or US? 

message: There are a couple of shorts of "Ben 10" On Demand from Time Warner Cable. They're in the Ben 10 section under Cartoon Network under Kids. Just thought I'd tell everyone.Chaoshi 06:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: someone added a Ben 10 short called 'Carjacked' to the article--Lerdthenerd (talk) 14:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben 10 Shorts 

message: For the airdates of Goodbye, and Good Riddance, and Ben vs. the Negative 10 it says October 22, and November 3. Those were the airdates in the Netherlands, not America or England. If you want to see the Netherlands airdates, go to the Netherlands Wikipedia, not here. We should change them to TBA.Igglybuff63 (talk) 16:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They aired back in December. Rau J16 20:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I live in the US, and i watched it on TV in December. Rau J16 20:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: are you the one editing it, because not that i distrust you, but i dont belive you. there were never any commercials, and nobody else saw them on tv in america.Igglybuff63 (talk) 22:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I havent touched it. i figured i'd let consensus rule(which was that it did not air). Rau J16 22:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

text: the Rougue Penguin and Todd appear to be reverting each other over the airdates.--Lerdthenerd (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Where? Rau J16 03:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: what about Goodbye and Good Riddance? that hasnt been aired in the usIgglybuff63 (talk) 13:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That aired the day before the live action movie, didn't it? Rau J16 17:45, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airdates 

message: whoever keeps blanking the article please stop, you will only get yourselves banned--Lerdthenerd (talk) 13:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanking the article 

message: I don't want to start another arguement about episode names, but is the episode when Ben obtains Benwolf called "Ben Wolf" or "Benwolf"? I recently bought it on iTunes and on the title (before I bought the episode) it says "Ben Wolf", but when I saw the episode, it said "Benwolf"?--Yenaldooshi (talk) 23:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ben Wolf or Benwolf" 

message: Why have these been put back? I thought they were removed from the Cartoon network website.--Lerdthenerd (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because they're not available now doesn't mean they shouldn't be included if they've existed in the past. Ged UK (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw the three of them On Cartoon Network Video, so I agree that they should be included.--Yenaldooshi (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

text:  someone changed them to season 5--Lerdthenerd (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then they changed it back. Ged UK (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben 10 shorties 

message: The Cartoon Network website has a list of episodes, plus descriptions, from Alien Force, should we put them in the article? Rhonin the wizard (talk) 13:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish I could say, but god that's an annoying website. Haven't got past the 'loading' icon yet. Ged UK (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Make a new article, for both the show and its episodes. This is long enough as is, and it'd be ungainly to use one page for both once it actually gets up and running. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 19:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Oh, and if you're trying to access the website using Firefox and NoScript, allow both Turner and Cartoon Network. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 19:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben 10: Alien Force episodes 

message: I believe that there was an alien in Ken 10 which appeared similar to and had the mannerisms of Billy. Can anyone remember what the Ben 10 week pop-ups stated that the alien's species was? The Martyr (converse with the Martyr) 02:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken 10 

message: Is it only me that something weird is happening for on this section? Currently, the 2 Neg 10 episodes are disconnected from the previous season's table and not fully attached to the shorts section. But when I try to edit it, the section heading is below the neg 10 section, but if you click on the shorts link in the TOC, it takes you to the Neg 10 listing. Wikitables make me cry, so anyone that can work out this weirdness would like to fix it, please have a try! Ged UK (talk) 06:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed it. The problem was that "|}" was placed before the Negative 10 episode, closing the table prematurely. Then the Negative 10 episodes were sitting there with out being part of a formal table, this cause some weirdness with the TOC, I dunno why, it just did. I have taken care of the problem, but I can see how the problem was easily missed. Thanks for pointing it out. Rau's Speak Page 07:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers! I just can't get my head around wikitables! Ged UK (talk) 07:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It takes practice. And I've played with Avatar's enough to learn it. Also, what is that little check mark for? Rau's Speak Page 07:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

text: It seems that Penguin removed it. Rau's Speak Page 07:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I put the tick on just to say that it had been sorted to save anyone else having to read the comments. *shrug* Ged UK (talk) 08:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it has relevance and should stay. But I'm going to place it at the top, that way they will see it when they arrive here. Rau's Speak Page 08:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative 10 / Shorts formatting weirdness 

message: I have the DVD already in Malaysia since december 2007. Rodimus Rhyme (talk) 07:05, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race against time DVD 

message: I updated the list of episodes with directors and writers for each episode, agree?.--OliverDF (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listen all