Talk:Washington Union Station

message: In no case does any passenger use a "step ladder" (portable ladder) to enter or exit any train at WAS' low platforms.  Amtrak's Amfleets, Horizons and Viewliners, MARC single-levels and Kawasaki bilevels, and VRE/MARC gallery cars all have stairwells built into the body of the cars.  Amtrak Superliners and the Bombardier bilevels that VRE once used have low floors and can only be boarded from a low platform.
71.173.5.199 (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Stepladder"?

message: That's the film! Thank you Anonymous 151.197.206.157. Maybe there's some good to anon. editors after all. Wetman 20:09, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Silver Streak (1976 film)|Silver Streak]]''

message: I am pretty sure I remember seeing another novel about Union Station while in the Barnes & Noble on the main floor.  I can't remember the author, though, and an Amazon search isn't coming up with much.  If anybody knows this novel - it's not the Truman one - could you please fill in the details?  Thanks! --Etoile 03:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Union Station Novel

message: Can anyone integrate the photo with the box so that they are the same width, with the photo at the top of the box, like so many similarly formatted pages? I'm not good at it. --06:14, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  This required removing the caption, but it wasn't really necessary anyway. -Etoile 16:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: With Firefox they're still side-by-side with white space all about. --Wetman 16:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: The food court area was redone in 2005. Could someone find out the exact dates of closure and reopening and put something in the Current Use section about it? (I'm new to wikipedia and can't write up to their standards yet.) C4bl3Fl4m3 00:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 Food Court Redo in the Current Use?

message: It is worth mentioning that trains coming from, and going to, the south use a tunnel under First Street SE when entering or leaving the station. However, I will leave this to a rail expert to include in the article. BTW, do the freight trains operating on the CSX Capital Division in Maryland also go through (or under) the station, assuming they need to use the First St. tunnel to continue on to Virginia? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a link for the First Street Tunnel. This tunnel is for passenger trains only. Freight trains on the CSX Capital Subdivision heading south leave the main line at Hyattsville, Maryland and proceed along the Alexandria Extension to southeast D.C., then west across the Anacostia Railroad Bridge to the RF&P Subdivision and across the Long Bridge to Virginia. Caseyjonz (talk) 05:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunnel

message: the Attractive grounds infront of the station are called Columbus Circle, Washington D.C..  I would like to add this, but I am unsure exactly where.--Niro5 21:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Columbus Circle

message: I considered adding VRE trains to the routebox, until I realized that they already exist in Union Station (Washington Metro). I know there's a good reason not to merge both articles, but if VRE stops here, why not add the lines to the routebox? DanTD 05:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: VRE in the Routebox too?

message: Anybody know why MARC doesn't have any station-specific links on their website(including D.C.)? I wanted to hook it up as an external link, but their website only seems to covers the whole railroad. ---- DanTD 14:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MARC's lack of a station-specific link 

message: The "Union Station" used in season 6, episode 2 of 24 is the Union Station in Los Angeles, not the one in Washington, D.C. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.187.219.110 (talk) 03:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not to be confused with Union Station (LA)

message: I have reorganised the existing content into a new 'description' section for details of the station now, a single history section with subsections for the historical content and a new 'incidents' section with a single subsection for the 1963 overrun incident. I have removed the '' inclusion because it its presence makes it impossible to include photos inline in the body text. Possibly someone can work out why that is happening and  then it can be reinserted. I have not removed or added any significant content. PeterEastern (talk) 20:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 6 August 2011 

message: This was not due to an icicle but caused by default construction. See: here -- Reinhard Dietrich (talk) 16:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident of 1953 

message: The infobox shows VRE ridership of 201,000. This seems rather implausible as a yearly or daily given that 2012 monthly ridership was in the 300k range. Are yearly or daily station-by-station totals available?  Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wonder why it has Amtrak and VRE ridership but no MARC ridership stats in the infobox. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  19:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's all well and good. But id you do find any info on MARC and VRE ridership at Union Station, you should put it back. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  22:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  VRE ridership 

message: Hi all. I've moved this information off the main page until it can be 1. sourced and 2. determined if it is WP:TRIVIA, as much of it seems to be. Thanks, epicAdam(talk) 21:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In the media" section 

message: The S-line templates in  contain successive stations, line and color information, while the Rail color box templates under  have only duplicate line and color info. They are redundant and, in a large station like this, stretch the Infobox and reduce the readability. There is no logical reason to have that shown twice. These parameters are designed to distinguish between when there is either only line information or when succession templates are available, or in those cases where the line refers to the trackage corridor. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Why shouldn't the services be shown twice? Moreover, why are you doing the same thing that you did at Pennsylvania Station (New York City)? Epicgenius (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have already told you the reason above. Why are you changing something that was done here a long time ago. You have that backwards! Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I already know that, as I've looked through the page history. The  and  aren't the same. The former are the next stops accompanied by the services, and the services are in the s-line solely to reduce confusion, not to completely replace the . Epicgenius (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant Line information in Infobox

message: Does anyone have a solid source for daily traffic through Union Station at its ostensible peak during World War II and today? The Union Station Redevelopment Corporation cites a WWII peak of "serving up to 42,000 passengers daily" yet Amtrak's 2012 Master Plan says the station currently handles "100,000 passenger trips per day". PRRfan (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The National Park Service site (U.S. Dept. of Interior) says "200,000". Centpacrr (talk) 22:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see something a bit more authoritative than NPS's tourist guide. Here's Union Station's own website: "In 1937, between 35,000 and 42,000 travelers swarmed through Union Station's vast concourse on a daily basis." So wartime traffic can be assumed to be well north of that. PRRfan (talk) 02:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to The Centennial History of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company by G.H. Burgess an M.C. Kennedy published by the PRR Co. in 1949, it states at page 686 that on December 24, 1943, "178,892 tickets were collected" on just the PRR trains that ran between Philadelphia and Washington. With all the other PRR, B&O, and trains from the south that would have passed through Union Station on that day, it is easy to believe that on many days during the WWII years in excess of 200,000 people would have regularly passed through Union Station. Centpacrr (talk) 10:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. I've readded the figure, and pointed people toward this discussion in the Notes. PRRfan (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The number cited in the text of the National Park Service site is "200,000", not "100,000", which is also supported by material found on page 686 in the PRR's 1949 "Centennial History" as noted above. With gasoline rationing and minimal air and bus service during WWII, virtually all intercity traveI during the war years was by rail. I have therefore corrected that number in both places it appears in the article. Centpacrr (talk) 22:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily traffic, historical and present 

message: and others, you might be able to make use of this 1902 article about plans for Union Station. It includes the rather spectacular drawing (right) which is interesting to compare to the final result. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. There appears to be some interesting information on the bottom as well, so I'll check it out. epicgenius (talk) 17:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1902 article and drawing 

message: The owners of the Union Station are Amtrak and United States Department of Transportation. The day-to-day manager is Union Station Redevelopment Corperation, and they leased the building to Ashkenazy Acquisition Corporation. SRich (talk) 20:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station Owner 

message: Substituted at 09:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Union Station (Washington, D.C.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080227173738/http://www.aacrealty.com/pressfiles/pdfs/washingtonpost.pdf to http://www.aacrealty.com/pressfiles/pdfs/washingtonpost.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article gives the Baltimore & Ohio and the Pennsylvania Railroad stations prior to the Union Station. What station did the Southern Railway use prior to the opening of Union Station?Dogru144 (talk) 15:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Railway station prior to Union Station  

message: (to participate in this debate please do so under Union Station (Washington Metro))
Old discussion, I know, but I think this station should be merged with Union Station (Washington Metro). It's already confusing in itself having two Union Station pages about 2 stations that are located at the same spot. Even with disambiguation's. The entrance Pylon for the Washington Metro is literally at the entrance of WUS. Other stations such as New Carrollton and Rockville have shared pages so why not this one.
Will Merge after a week and no objections Isntabelle (talk) 13:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Union Station (Washington Metro)