lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pascagoula Abduction

message: This is the first article I've run across, which dates back to 2004 and has a talk page clean as crystal. The references/citations are insufficient. There seems a number of good sources out there, as discussed here (after archiving new link will be: Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_44#Pascagoula_Abduction). The current referencing do not comply with WP:Source exactly. Logos (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no WP:RS references here. Just the Black Vault, MUFON and a bunch of broken links. Why does this article exist? Simonm223 (talk) 19:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because. Tonybaldacci (talk) 03:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Anderson, California

message: Anderson California has been well known for harboring ex-Ku Klux Klan members and has been notable recently for hate crimes, such as the recent cross burning in the front lawn of an African American resident's front lawn.
The one who originally put up this section, seems to have had a strong bias, as shown here. 
I've already removed the other parts dealing with drugs and pollution, as it was not sourced at all.  
This section can not even be reworded.  There are no sources for Anderson being a 'well known' place for harboring ex KKK members and while the cross burning is interesting especially in a city this size if the same was done to every single other city in the world who has had a hate crime, what would we end up with? Crumnut 11:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 
Talk:Metro Ethernet

message: Quote from second paragraph:  due to the prevalent use of Ethernet in corporate and, more recently, residential networks.
I am pretty sure ethernet at home has been around for a while.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webdawg (talk • contribs) 01:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the 90's? 

message: Hello - I'm currently working on the Hatteras Networks page (please see my COI declaration at Talk:Hatteras_Networks) and have added the company to the list of vendors supplying Metro Ethernet equipment. I have linked the two articles, as the Hatteras article currently is noted as an orphan. Please let me know if you have any questions; I would warmly welcome any suggestions or edits to the Hatteras article.
Mdrozdowski (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: About three years later, and that link is no longer in this article (and that article's name was changed too, evidently due to a merger) so the COI template can probably go away. There are a couple old uncited assertions that should also disappear probably. W Nowicki (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 

message: This article needs to be almost entirely rewritten. A very small portion of the article is sourced (there are multiple large unsourced sections), much of the formatting is inconsistent or incorrect, there are many instances of second-person pronouns, etc. As I have time I will begin trimming down the article; anyone who's willing please be bold to improve the article, keeping in mind the standards of verifiability and neutrality. —danhash (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have begun removing a large amount of unsourced content. Some of this content may be appropriate to add back, but we must have more sources. —danhash (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I agree with the suggestion that this be re-done under the title "Carrier Ethernet," since that's less ambiguous nowadays.  Also, capitalization matters: the Metropolitan Area Ethernet, the MAE, was the first IXP.  A metropolitan area Ethernet is a metro-scale Ethernet WAN.  So, yeah.  Happy to participate in a group effort, but not sure I have time to take it on myself and do it justice. Bill Woodcock (talk) 01:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Errr, ok, so a Carrier Ethernet article already exists. Merge! Bill Woodcock (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yep, high time for a re-write.
Talk:Andrew Hill High School

message: I removed the Jim McMahon reference under the Alumni section because he did not graduate from Andrew Hill.  He graduated from Roy High School in Utah. Source: http://espn.go.com/classic/biography/s/McMahon_Jim.html
--BillyRamirez 20:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andrew Molera State Park

message: Updating importance of article from "low" to "mid" (as per Wikipedia:WikiProject_California/Assessment#Importance_scale - "Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area." state beaches qualify as notable protected areas, and notable in their particular geographic location.)
-- Charlesreid1 (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing importance to mid
Talk:Angel City Chorale

message: Love that this page isn’t hiding the fact that it is scantly verified and isn’t even remotely written in a neutral point of view.  This page needs to be fixed or nominated for speedy deletion.  2605:A000:160D:22B1:30F4:FBE3:C8D9:DEE (talk) 03:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious Page Issues
Talk:Angeles Forest Highway

message: This article has prose more appropriate for a tour guide. It was nice, but didn't fit into WP. I did my best to clean it up to standards; references still need to be fixed. 204.108.0.11 (talk) 22:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It was getting kind of flowery.   Will Beback  talk   22:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone
Talk:Angelus Oaks, California

message: This entry about a community on southern california reads like an advertisement for a lodge. The lodge is not a big part of the community, yet 80% of the article is about the lodge's history and the fact that it is being renovated and will soon be available for rent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.60.69.100 (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange Entry... 

message: Not sure the temperature table is correct.  Although it squares with Weatherbase source, I'd question the Weatherbase source.  Basically, the low temps appear far too warm for a SoCal mountain location; in fact, it appears like the warmest kind of semi-tropical location like Santa Monica or Palos Verdes when looking at the winter temperatures.   Unless there's some really weird warm thermalcline that really enables these temperatures, I'd say this is wrong.  Accuweather history makes it look alot colder in winter, but, of course, this could be Big Bear stats.   Anyway, just happened to stumble on this after the recent 08/2022 monsoonal rains encountered there, and wanted to see the average weather.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.223.10.226 (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: ============
Talk:Angelus-Rosedale Cemetery

message: This article contains the same text as the cemetery's website.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nynative (talk • contribs) 00:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * There are many large monuments at the cemetery. Were they important to the growth of Los Angeles? Ucla90024 (talk) 01:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: In second paragraph, isn't there some better phrase than "used by" to convey proper meaning? And the sentence is kinda 'run-on' anyway ... 66.81.251.10 (talk) 07:45, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording
Talk:Angelus Temple

message: To whoever put this article together, nice work.  It is well-balanced and thoughtful.  I love this old building!  MixedMartial1984 (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice work 
Talk:Anglican Episcopal Church

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Episcopal Church have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Anna's hummingbird

message: reverted my addition of Lesson's initials here. For birds, English wikipedia follows the IOC – Anna's hummingbird is here and Lesson's initials are included.
 
Initials are added when there is more than one authority with the same name. For example there is a Gmelin, JF and a less common Gmelin, SG. However, in the case of Lesson, only René Lesson is cited as an authority in the IOC list of world birds – perhaps the IOC includes the initials to avoid confusion with his brother Pierre Adolphe Lesson. The brother was a botanist and I haven't come across any animals named by him. It looks as if René Lesson's initials are unnecessary. - Aa77zz (talk) 10:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initials for [[René Primevère Lesson]] in the speciesbox
Talk:Anno Domini (gallery)

message: I've stumbled across this article via WP:WPNN. I've saved it from possible (?) deletion in the future by adding references et cetera. I know This article needs to be expanded a lot more as there is so much information about the gallery out there. I am wanting to revamp/ rebirth the entire article. However, I am in a time crunch as I have a busy life. Anyone else who would like to edit/contribute to this article, please do! I have a lot of faith in it and will be steadily working on it when time allows. Amor amor (talk) 03:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement
Talk:Antelope Valley College

message: See this Flickr set, CC "free" license. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:34, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More photos available 
Talk:Antelope Valley Press

message: This Wiki article should be rated a D because it's seriously lacking in references and some of it looks like personal opinions and inside info.
2606:6000:FECD:1400:7819:126C:6FF:284B (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating/references/personal opinions
Talk:Antelope, California

message: The history section is mostly copy / pasted from here — Johnl1479(talk) 08:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I am honestly horrible at creating images, so I wouldn't be able to create a new picture for the map, but I think Antelope needs a new one. The one on there looks like somebody got a map of California and put a red dot where they thought the area should be at... Can somebody please provide another? Thanks SO much in advance. Killiondude (talk) 05:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked out several cities/CDP in several counties of California, and I didn't find any images like the one on the Antelope page. Some of the places I just looked up were Woodland, CA, Arden-Arcade, CA, Auburn, CA, and Gardena, CA to name a few (each in a different county). I like the images in those because the left side gives the county that the city/CDP is, and the right side shows where the place is in respect to the county. Killiondude (talk) 04:22, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map picture 
Talk:Antioch Bridge

message: This article, other sources online, and the bridge's page on ca.gov all seem to be pretty unanimous that the Antioch Bridge allows bike and pedestrian traffic. So me and my buddy went there, with tripod and telephoto lens in tow, to have a nice walk and get some shots of surrounding landforms... I've climbed on top of some pretty sketchy things to take photos before, but this was completely out of pocket. I think there was about two feet of space between an active single-lane highway and the edge of the structure -- with no barrier whatsoever between car traffic and the space you were supposed to be traipsing across. I'm going to add an image to the article of what we found -- I think "pedestrian bridge" ought to be taken out of the lead, and mentioned with qualification if at all in the body. jp×g 02:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pedestrian bridge" my ass!
Talk:Khomer Mekomi

message: I found :Image:72452291.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:72452291.jpg]]

message: :Image:72452291.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:72452291.jpg
Talk:Apple Hill

message: Many sources about this topic: Customized Google News Archive search. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional sources
Talk:Arcata High School

message: Editors CAN NOT write about very critical information on living people without citing sources. Editors who see such information without sources are encouraged to delete it immediately. The reason is simple: it's unfair to the people who are criticized, attacked and possibly defamed. Therefore I deleted critical comments on the former principal and replaced a short section with a single sentence noting the change in principals. See WP:BIO for a better description of Wikipedia policy. The section I replaced certainly seemed to be striving for fairness, and (without looking into it) I don't doubt the sincerity of the editor(s) who wrote it, but it's a dangerous violation of policy. This does not preclude writing something critical about a living person, just cite the fact that some reliable source said it and keep in mind that it should be important information, generally encyclopedic and hurt the person being criticized as little as possible (one thing to think about is how that person's family would feel if they read it — that's not the only consideration, but it's an important consideration. Is what you're writing about important enough to override that hurt?). Noroton 16:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia policies about living people

message: I removed this section, which stated it was copied from the institute's web page with permission.  The assertion of permission is not sufficient to allow copying; it's still a potential copyvio.  In order to show permission, the copyright holder should 1) add to the website text explicitly licensing the website's content under the GFDL, or 2) send an email to the permissions address, from the organization's email account, explicitly granting permission.  For full details, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Shimeru 00:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arts Institute
Talk:Arcata Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wildlife Sanctuary

message: I have requested a reference citation; because the presently stated figure of one month seems appreciably longer than estimates of a few days listed in some references.  Residence time within a relatively inflexible marsh volume varies inversely with sewage volume and rainfall, so it might be better to state a range of residence times.Thewellman (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wastewater residence time in the marsh treatment system
Talk:ARCO Arena (1985)

message: I can't find ARCO Arena I on Google maps. Are we sure it's still around? ---Ransom (--69.104.41.174 22:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still around? 
Talk:Arden Fair

message: My recollection of the only visit that I made to the mall before its big renovation in the late 1980s includes a visit to a food court. The article as written implies that there was no food court prior to that renovation. I did not change the article because I didn't find anything that supports my recollection... or refutes it for that matter. Jim (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The "food court" you're probably referring to was the old Food Circus cafeteria that existed next to the mall and wasn't included in the mall proper. This, of course, now is the Market Square at Arden Fair with United Artists Theatres, Barnes & Noble and, coincidently, several eateries. A postcard of the place is located here. --PhATxPnOY916 (talk) 01:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food Court 
Talk:Area codes 209 and 350

message: Who has to change there area code in 209 2601:205:C280:910:79DC:29F2:C61:36B3 (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The image map template still needs adjustment to add the overlay code. kbrose (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  350 area code
Talk:Area codes 310 and 424

message: The statement in the article that "310 was the first area code to use the form N-1-0" is not correct. Compare the following:
:510 - September 1991 09/02/1991 Area code 510 was put into service
:410 - October 1991 10/06/1991 Area code 410 was put into service
:310 - November 1991 11/02/1991 Area code 310 was put into service
:910 - November 1993 11/14/1993 Area code 910 was put into service
:810 - December 1993 12/01/1993 Area code 810 was put into service
:610 - January 1994 01/08/1994 Area code 610 was put into service
Plus, there is this issue:
:710 - January 1984 01/01/1984 Area code 710 was put into service. Area code 710 is reserved for the Federal Government
Anyone have any different information? Or any other objection to correcting the text? Tobeprecise (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area Code 310 was not the first to have format N-1-0 
Talk:Area codes 415 and 628

message: 415 can't possibly have been created in 1947, etc. 207.114.132.30 (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  There were indeed a few such creations in the early days, but not in California, though the trisection (213, 415, 916) was rearranged from the first proposal. —Tamfang (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

message: : Individuals who request such a change will receive their new phone numbers starting in December of this year.
2008? 2009? 2010? —Tamfang (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not gay, but I only changed my number because I moved out of state. 

message: The two maps are stacked vertically. What does "map to the right" mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.126.205 (talk) 12:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Map to the right"? 

message: I’m pretty sure 408 didn’t disappear and probably holds more numbers than any of the others listed, so I don’t know that the map is all that accurate, but that’s not what this discussion is about so I’m just realizing I’m kind of being a dick here. My bad. But really, outside of LA, it probably has more numbers. 2600:1011:B069:E036:7D0D:8D69:D2B6:8D83 (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: see: area code 408. - Procyonidae (talk) 01:11, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to 4-0-8?
Talk:Area codes 510 and 341

message: Can anyone actually provide any citations other than urban dictionary for this?  I've lived in the area my whole life, and never heard a single person ever utter that phrase.  Since the late 90s, the area is known as "the east bay" or (less often) "the five-ten".
A Google search can't seem to find ANY other reference to the "five and dime" being the east bay other than the urban dictionary posting.  Additionally, the urban dictionary posting misstates when the area got the 510 area code -- directly contradicting the Wikipedia article: "since prior to the 1990's 510 covered that area as well" (the area code was created in 1991, and was split from the area referred to in 1998).
I'm removing the reference, as a colloquial name is also not particularly relevant on an area code article anyway.  Those who disagree are free to revert, but should ideally explain their view here 70.36.143.146 (talk) 04:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The five and dime" 

message: Telegraphy#Telex states the following:
TWX had special area codes: 510, 610, 710, 810 and 910. With the demise of TWX service, these codes were re-provisioned as standard geographic NPAs in the 1990s.
Can anyone add a history section for this area code?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.42.230.51 (talk) 23:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  history of 510 

message: 4 t 4565 31st 75.75.129.32 (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 56
Talk:Area codes 760 and 442

message: The link to reference 1 is broken! How do you mark broken links in Wikipedia (from a N00B).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smarter1 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

message: As of 2012, new telephone numbers are being assigned with the new 442 overlay area code. In early 2012, at least one business had a large sign in Carlsbad, California, advertizing land; the phone number listed began (442) 999-xxxx. When I moved to a "55+" apartment complex in Carlsbad in late July, I received a internet-based home phone number by Time Warner Cable starting with (442) 333-xxxx. So 760 is indeed running out of numbers and the 442 code is now being used. It took over two years but it's happening. -- Glenn L (talk) 03:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  442 Area Code numbers now being assigned 
Talk:Area codes 805 and 820

message: The map on the side fails to highlight 805 in the Greater Los Angeles popout. 
75.79.66.83 (talk) 16:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: Humm. In this article it says that 805 was a split from 213, where as the NANPA site says it   split from 415. Can anybody find documentation supporting the 213 split assertion? If not I think I will change it. -- Imlepid 04:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split from...? 

message: The article says 805 covers a small portion of Los Angeles County. Underneath Los Angeles County Westlake Village is listed. None of the actual city of Westlake Village in Los Angeles County is in the 805 area code. Most of the Westlake Village within the city of Thousand Oaks is in the 805 area code. With that said. I am going to get rid of Los Angeles County as one of the counties.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielboros100 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Los Angeles County