lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wilde Beast

message: Acceleration is not measured in the same units as speed.  While speed is measured in \frac{\mbox{change in distance}}{\mbox{unit time}}, acceleration is measured in \frac{\mbox{change in speed}}{\mbox{unit time}}=\frac{\frac{\mbox{change in distance}}{\mbox{unit time}}}{\mbox{unit time}}=\frac{\mbox{change in distance}}{\mbox{unit time}^2}.  Therefore, the information under the "acceleration" heading in the infobox in the article is inaccurate since acceleration can never be measured in miles per hour.  What's going on here?   somody 18:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that "0 to 75 mph in X seconds" was what was meant but I don't know what the X is.  I've fixed it up so that the acceleration won't appear until we have that X. Jɪmp 03:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceleration Units
Talk:David Kaye (voice actor)

message: There was material here for a time about a footballer.  If someone desires to start a new article about the footballer they should do so, but they should not simply write over the content concerning the voice actor. NoIdeaNick 09:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Says here he was one of the new mutants, not Prof. X or Apocalypse. -Sox207 19:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of X-Men: Evolution characters]] 

message: I think I remember reading somewhere that the "David A. Kaye" credited as playing Lichtendahl in the Gundam 00 dub is a different person, and that this David Kaye no longer works with Ocean Group. Are we sure that's not the case? 71.203.209.0 (talk) 18:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gundam 00 

message: Logan carter 86.4.76.170 (talk) 23:45, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead island
Talk:X2 (roller coaster)

message: I'm opposed to the proposed merge with the spinning roller coaster article. See my comments at Talk:Spinning_roller_coaster. Dan
I agree. An merger seems unnecessary because X is a Six Flags Magic Mountain roller coaster, not a roller coaster type. Jonyyeh 01:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The track inverts twice; the seats invert six times.  RCDB counts track inversions only. Timetrial3141592 01:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with spinning coasters article 

message: How can the first drop be deeper than the height of the whole thing? Are there underground sections of the ride? Or might that be an error in the data table?--SiriusB 15:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Height is a very ambiguous term when related to roller coasters, however in this context height is the largest vertical distance from the ground to the track. As you can see here, the track continues below the level of the supports for the lift - so I would presume the difference between the figures comes from this, however that clearly isn't a 40ft difference. It doesn't help that we blindly copy information across from rcdb, but it's the most reliable source we have. Seaserpent85 15:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height vs. Drop 

message: The name of the coaster should be constistent with the name the park uses.Revcpa (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: X2 is actually the first 4th dimension rollercoaster opened in 2002. The next 4D coaster was Eejanaika opened in 2006. The article states X2 was the second, but it did not follow events, as renovation started in 2007, not "opening". XaRcRR22W232k (talk) 03:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are correct. As you can see from these edits, a random IP editor changed it from first to second without explaining why. I reverted the edits, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 03:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  X2 is the first 4th Dimension coaster.
Talk:St. Catherine's School (Richmond, Virginia)

message: Hi. These images are tagged as "promotional" at Commons, and as such are subject to speedy deletion. If you want to keep using these images, please upload them locally under the fair use rationale. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi -- sorry about that. Go ahead and delete them from Commons; I uploaded them to Wikipedia under "promotional". I didn't realize that there were different policies. Dylan 13:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Stcbuilding2.jpg]] and [[:Image:BacotHall.jpg]] 

message: I've given this article a copy edit, added a disambiguating word for non-US users, and removed the more brochure-like POV adjectives.  An external reference for the sentence about the teams constantly winning titles would be useful.  Accounting4Taste 16:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: Alumni should be Alumnae.  The latin word for plural all women graduates is Alumnae. Thepeppers (talk) 18:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Sceptre (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2019
Talk:Sterkfontein

message: It's known as the Cradle of Humankind, not humanity.
People who are not from Africa just refuse to think that humans originated there, because they look down on Africa. There is a lot of evidence coming from all over Africa. I am a proud African.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.10.121.2 (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The images on here look a mess on this page. Especially beneath the external links section. What should we do? - Erebus555 16:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: A usual site has a reason that it was suited for preservation. Since the behaviour of early hominids is hard to reconstruct, and where traits would decide locations, i think reasons and methods as well as overall state of preservation of hominids in  situ are of greatest importance. So for example in sterkfontein or markapansgat many of the specimen (all?) have been found in pit's that may or may not funcioned as a trap, burial site 
(eg. "Zin", no i think 'the black skull' is suggestive of not having end up there up itself), sth. with predators (that at the same time died their themselves) etc. Since it is anyhow hard to reconstruct any traits or iow. reasons for their existence in situ, i think the subject deserves attention in wikipedia, as it is a geological reconstruction that is nowadays allways done at least to the point deposition methods etc. are proven. I know plenty of random facts about such strata, yet in covering the subject wiki is not allways a great help. this page rg. is dedicated to the site after all.24.132.170.252 (talk) 21:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: preservation

message: London Daily Telegraph - at this link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolution/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-found.html - suggests strongly there will be an announcement on 8th April 2010, about a new hominid fossil, understood to be a nearly/partially complete skeleton.
The Newspaper suggests this will be a new species in the genus .
Speculation so far, but the article states that South African President Jacob Zuma has already visited.
Autochthony wrote - 1513z 4th April 2010. 81.155.135.232 (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New fossils?
Talk:Dapper Drake

message: I'm one of the founding Ubuntu developers. As an Ubuntu developer, I'm gratified to see so much enthusiasm; but as a Wikipedian I do question whether this page is needed.
I did a bunch of editing on this page for spelling, grammar, style, and accuracy; there's still rather a lot to do. When I got to it, there were some things that were outright wrong: the author had evidently misinterpreted some preliminary design documents from the Ubuntu Wiki as definitive statements of features that were to be added to Ubuntu 6.04, and enthusiastically put them in "Big News". Looking down the list of "Big News" and improvements, not all the items are immediately familiar to me, and I'd have to check to make sure that they really are going to land; furthermore I'm pretty sure that there are other more interesting and important changes that have been omitted. However, is it really worth my while doing this? There's a perfectly good Ubuntu wiki and huge quantities of more up-to-date and accurate information there; surely it would be better to have general information here, and refer to the Ubuntu wiki for detailed development information that doesn't have so much general interest to Wikipedia readers. At present we run the risk of misleading.
Also, from an encyclopaedic point of view, I'm not convinced that a single unreleased version of an operating system merits a top-level wiki page. Then again, I guess there are Wikipedia pages for several versions of Microsoft Windows, so maybe I'm wrong. Even so, it should be renamed to at least have "Ubuntu" in the page name. At present, I think we would be better off reducing this page to a set of links and folding it into the main Ubuntu page.
-- 83.216.156.196 09:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page needed? 

message: In reply to the above comment... 
From the buzz going around, it sounds like support for Dapper Drake will be for 3-5 years instead of the usual 18 months. This sounds like a significant release (such as Windows 98 vs. Windows 98 service pack 2). Otherwise, yes, this page may not have merit. And even if, I agree with having Ubuntu in the title.
160.94.56.98 14:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Release?
Talk:Rainwater Basin Wetland Management District

message: I think this article and the one at Rainwater Basin should be merged, keeping the infobox template and all the information that doesn't double from both articles. I created this one as part of the an effort to write articles for federally managed areas, of which this is one...I should have checked better to see that another article on the same topic essentially already existed. If we merge rainwater Basin into this one, we should, of course redirect that article here.--MONGO 09:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that these two articles should be merged.  I think that the merged article should reside at Rainwater Basin, as the term is (sometimes) used as a general identifier for the region of the state, and not just in conjunction with those areas in the Wetland Management District. –– Swid (talk | edits) 20:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer to keep the infobox, and combine text so long as we don't get redundant, but your article title is fine. I'm not beholden to the way mine is over yours so I trust you'll do what you think is best.--MONGO 05:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jeff Pilson

message: When did Jeff Pilson play in Ratt?Alterego269 00:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratt 

message: Should Gene Simmons be listed? Jeff has stated in some interviews that he doesn't like Kiss/Gene Simmons, due to Simmons' commercialization of the metal genre. 
Paul McCartney should be listed, because Jeff is a Beatles
fan and has said in some interviews, he would like to work
with McCartney. 75.75.176.243 (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences section 

message: Jeff Pilson is 50-years-old.  He was in my graduating class of 1976, RA Long High school, Longview, Washington, a mill town of about 35,000 people.  It's lame of him to lie about his age like he does!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.220.25 (talk) 04:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 
Talk:Prophylaxis

message: The dude is right, the pageon prophylaxis seems a little incomplete moreover this page has just 2 line so, it wld be good to do so
We should also mention other forms of treatment regimen.
Prophylaxis being treatment before getting a disease. There must be other classes. These should be linked from the page.
Here primary prophylaxis is really the main subject being discussed, so it would sound irreevant to have secondary prophylaxis under the same heading! It should be treated on its own, maybe a link should be provided at the end of the page, that directs readers to secondary prophylaxis!
Regards
Regarding the opening paragraph:
"Prophylaxis (Greek "προφυλάσσω" to guard or prevent beforehand) is any medical or public health procedure whose purpose is to prevent, rather than treat or cure a disease. Roughly, prophylactic measures are divided between primary prophylaxis (to prevent the development of a disease) and secondary prophylaxis (whereby the disease has already developed and the patient is protected against worsening of this process)." (italics my own)
It doesn't make sense to say that prophylaxis is to prevent rather than treat or cure disease and that secondary prophylaxis is a procedure put into place when the disease has already developed. If the disease has already developed, it cannot be prevented. In addition, "protecting against the worsening of this process" is treating. Perhaps prophylaxis is primarily the process whose purpose is to prevent, rather than treat or cure disease?
While I understand the preceding argument, I disagree. Once a disease has occurred it does make sense to consider treatment that prevents other symptoms from occurring as prophylactic. An example might be oral lichen planus. It is a disease that on its own causes great discomfort in the mouth of the sufferer. It can be treated in a number of ways. The condition can also lead to cancer in some cases. While the patient may receive treatment to conquer lichen planus, prophylactic treatment can also be given that could prevent other, and potentially more serious, conditions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.33.48 (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The
Talk:The Automatic Mixtapes Generator

message: Made changes to this page. Would be greatful if explanation for speedy deletion tag was given. thanks. Suggestions are welcome.
Thanks for the input. B/c amg is just a public process, and tinymixtapes is a not for profit public resource, i don't see any commercial advertising problems. Anyway, I'll fix the article so it is more informative and seems less like a content-free promo/plug... 
Ovaltine 13:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  speedy deletion? 

message: Further changes made to the article. If concerns remain, please post here. I have no huge qualms about having the article deleted if concerns about 'advertising' remain...though I don't think there ought to be any worries in that regard.
Cheers, Ovaltine 13:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I think the article is not notable enough to be included, see WP:WEB and WP:Notability. Mushroom (Talk) 13:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yup, that's a valid point. Ovaltine 14:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes 

message: This article is almost longer than the TMT main article, so i suggest we merge it.  Husky (talk page) 17:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Zonule of Zinn

message: I'd like to nominate this article for single best name of a body part, ever.
:I second the nomination! Adambrowne666 11:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose a new category: :Category:Things with totally awesome names. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.142.22.125 (talk • contribs) 6 May 2007 
I would nominate it but i think that it has been made up as a scam for the internet.  Hezbolarki Fun Ship 14:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Best body part, ever

message: Merge. Zonule of Zinn, the annular ligament of Zinn, the suspensory ligament of the lens, and the ciliary zonule refer to the same fibres. Hovea 14:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Per the comments above, I am about to merge Zonule of Zinn and Zonular fibers, which has been proposed since Feb '07. For want of a better method of assessing the common name, I have chosen to merge to Zonule of Zinn based on Google search results: "Zonule of Zinn" -wikipedia (6,170) and "Zonular fibers" -wikipedia (3,430) --Lox (t,c) 15:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: Copyright Lox, There is no copyright violation in my contribution. I have been published in IOVS (Nov. 2006, an important peer reviewed ophthalmology journal, on the subject. I would expand on it but I am too busy undoing the deletions every time I come back. AnBeCa (talk) 03:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issue
Talk:Loliondo, Ngorongoro

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 08:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Live & off the Record

message: As per WikiProject guidelines, live albums should be excluded from the chronology field in the album infobox. - Oskarg956 07:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 
Talk:John Vickers

message: It is the same person, and apparently the spelling is "Jon". However, I suspect the John Vickers article is a copyvio, perhaps we should paraphrase some of it rather than merge. David.Monniaux 10:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Saint Louis, Oregon

message: Hopefully, someone else will come in and fill out more information. I don't have any more information about this town, and I don't yet understand how to put up requests for articles. Legend has it that St. Louis served, for a brief time, as the capital of Oregon. Maybe whoever fills this page out can either confirm this legend or put it to rest for once. -- Andrew Parodi 10:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article creation
Talk:Jock of the Bushveld

message: : He used to ...
: The book appeared...  
</div>
: I have reduced the quote from the contrib above (added at 10:33, 20 February 2006 by , and placed inside the box by me) to the first 3 words of each of its two paragraphs. It was a COPYVIO, even tho it was not in the main ("article") namespace where we do most of our worrying about that. If the material has been paraphrased into the article, perhaps whoever confirms that could note it immediately following this; if it hasn't, a second opinion on the value of doing so would be valuable following this. --Jerzy•t 05:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is about the breed, not the dog, and those interested should find it (probably without the PoV abt what is ironic) by following a lk to an article on the breed:
:  (This is ironic because it is common nowadays for breeds similar to Jock to be stolen to compete in dog fights in Alexandra, Johannesburg.)
--Jerzy•t 05:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed material 

message: >>He was once enticed to fight a baboon by Seedling. He killed the baboon in the fight, due to his small, stocky build.
What's "Seedling"?
It's capitalized as if it were a person or place, but there's no link, nor other mention made in the article.
Mike (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seedling? 

message: This article from the Mail & Guardian newspaper makes a compelling case for the fact that Jock was a Staffie and not an American Bull Terrier:
This article on the Kruger National Park's website about Sir FitzPatrick's life states that Jock was a cross breed. It's important to note that FitzPatrick and Jock's adventures played out in the area where the Kruger Park is today.
Lastly we get to FitzPatrick's own book
Unphazed2048 (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breed – Staffordshire Bull Terrier cross (not pure and not American)
Talk:Humber Scout Car

message: WarWheels ( http://www.warwheels.net/BritishArmouredCarProductionFiguresArticleBROWN.html ) citing the "Half Yearly Reports on the Progress of the Royal Armoured Corps" :
The Mark II will not incorporate the P.L.M. Mounting, since it has been necessary to delete this, the roof, and other items to counterbalance the increase in the weight of the additional Belly armour.
On the other side, Forty only say the Mk II was heavier and had different transmission.
Also, WarWheels article about the vehicle is called "Humber Scout Car Mark Ib" ( http://www.warwheels.net/humberscoutcarINDEX.html ). However, I was unable to find any information about variant called "Mk Ib".
Can somebody clarify on variants and exact differences between them ? Bukvoed 10:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Variants
Talk:Load-bearing wall

message: what type of bricks use in the load bearing wall? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swpb (talk • contribs) 22:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The article is not written in encyclopedic style at present, and lacks wikification. The part headed'How to identify bearing walls in small residential buildings' belongs in WikiHow not Wikipedia. StoptheDatabaseState 01:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Non-load bearing wall and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Non-load bearing wall until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  65.92.244.114 (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non-load bearing wall" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Demographics of Finland

message: http://www.stat.fi/static/media/uploads/tup/suoluk/kuviot/english_vrm018.png
explains the Swedish speakers better and also other languages. perhaps something like this could be included  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.204.102 (talk) 03:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  nice graphic 

message: Someone seems to have hacked the article and removed all the corrections I added. I have reverted it to the  corrected version.  They could be using the name User:TylerBurden or NagNandoor - but that latter name gets no usere with that name "Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact name" sic when I click on this. 91.154.169.156 (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no "hacking", you removed referenced content, and replaced it with unreferenced content, hence the fact that your edits were reverted. TylerBurden (talk) 01:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reverted hacking 

message: Where is it? Why it was deleted? AndreyBre (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This was additional important information, beyond previous years' annual totals. 2001:8A0:65AE:3B00:A037:5176:5120:938 (talk) 22:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Population of Finland has surpassed 5.5 million the current population is 5,643,712 million please update the outdated informaation. 85.156.213.128 (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current vital statistics?
Talk:Venetian Lagoon

message: A map showing the islands and other features in and around the lagoon would be informative. -- Beland (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: I have moved the following addition here:
	
four ecotones could be identified:"head", the upper tract, lower tract and the mouth.
While "ecotone" could be wikilinked, it doesn't help me understand what this is about. This really needs more exposition and context for it to make sense. -- Donald Albury 11:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecotones? 
Talk:St Mary's Cathedral Choir, Sydney

message: Oh, By the way, David Russell is NOT the classical guitarist also on wikipedia, so don't link it up to him.
Kamatsu
1.144.97.72 (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Russell 
Talk:Avernus (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Is there really any need for this article to exist? There is already an article on Baator, which covers Avernus; it is not so large that a separate article is required. I think we should merge any new information from here in to the article on Baator. -- Lewis 11:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems reasonable to me. JoshuaZ 13:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pointless Stub?