lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:History of Azerbaijan

message: Aivazovsky, there is no need to remove the Albanian stone and reinsert Momine khatun in history template. Have you discussed this with other contributors, to come to consensus? I am restoring the image, until you engage in discussion and explain the reasons for your replacement. Thanks. Atabek (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anon IP edited this page, in what could be considered as vandalism. Restoring to previous version. Atabek (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template Image

message: The coat of arms was removed in Octoboer 2009 and the template stayed without an image until May 2010 when someone added the Gobustan image. I personally prefer the coat of arms, but I will leave it for others to decide which image is better:
* :File:Coat of arms of Azerbaijan.svg
* :File:Gobustan_ancient_Azerbaycan.jpg
--Enric Naval (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  coat of arms?
Talk:Jonas Lie (government minister)

message: Lie did not commit suicide. He died from a heart attack due to stress and the consumation of a large quantity of alchohol.
It should also be mentioned that he was a high rank police officer before the war. Among other thing he visited the FBI to study their methods, and he escorted Lev Trotsky to Mexico when the Russian was expelled from Norway. Lie was also, like his father and grandfather, a novellist. His greatest success as an author was his thrillers, published during the 1930's under the alias of Max Mauser.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linkomfod (talk • contribs) 17:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lie died during a desperate shootout standoff with the authorities at Skallum on 11 May 1945. According to Sverre Rødder's biography of Lie, Min ære er troskap (Aschehoug, 1990), p. 222, that he died of alcohol-related illness is mere speculation. The other details of his life you mention are true, and should be added sometime, maybe when Bernt Rougthvedt's coming biography of Lie is published. — Zalktis 18:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Heart attack being the cause of death, and this being related to the stress and heavy drinking, might be speculation, as there was no positive conclusion of the authopsy. But it is the by far most probable explanation. The current statement of unknown cause of death is a mystification; akin to other mystifications (and heroizing) of the death of prominent Nazis. Linkomfod (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  For the record, Nils Johan Ringdal's 1989 book on Sverre Riisnæs cites alcohol and pills as the "most likely reason" (p.143). I'll check out Rødder. Punkmorten (talk) 16:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Note: Rødder's book says nothing of a shootout. I don't know where you got that idea. However, it does mention that alcohol may have been one of several factors. Punkmorten (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, Ringdal's Mellom barken og veden, pp. 344ff., gives an account of the standoff at Skallum as well. —Zalktis (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's more to this 
Talk:Eugène Pelletan

message: I've uploaded a caricature of Pelletan at :commons:Image:Gill-Pelletan.jpg. The article seems too small right now to add a second image, but if it grows, then someone should add it. - Jmabel | Talk 23:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caricature 
Talk:Fabuland

message: Forget double redirects, this article was recently a triple redirect with Fabuland -> FABULAND -> Lego Fabuland -> LEGO Star Wars (the last jump of which makes no sense).  The only other Wiki article mentioning Fabuland seems to be History of Lego, so I pointed all three of them there instead.  --Stratadrake 13:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Publishers Weekly list of bestselling novels in the United States in the 1970s

message: What is the source for this page? It seems like there should be at least a link.
Carhutt (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @Carhutt: Good point. Sometime after your 27 May 2020 post, I added an inline citation re: 1970 - 1975. Unfortunately we can't be sure about the source for 1976 - 1979. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 13:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source?
Talk:Eugenio Montale

message: Badly written article from beginning to end. Seems illiterate. What happened?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.235.212.17 (talk) 07:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly written 
Talk:Industrial National Bank Building

message: The Bank Of America tower was NOT the tallest in New England when built. 
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=122589 <-----  Traveller's Tower in Hartford 161 meters, built before BOA building in Providence
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=125380 <----- BOA building in Providence 128 Meters
Also, the zip code is 02903, not whatever it was posted as. Who put this page together?
:I see emporis has clear counterexamples to this being the tallest building in New England, but if you read , you'll see Woodward making claims to the contrary:
:::-p101
:What do we make of this? Do we assume McKenzie hasn't done his homework?--Loodog 21:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have heard several times that the building's upper stepped section was designed as a docking point for airships, though never used for this purpose. Does anyone have any thoughts on tracking down a reliable source for this claim? Dialectric (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is widely rumored, but I don't know how true it is.  The only source I could find.--Louiedog (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And I guess that source came from here.--Louiedog (talk) 15:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airship / Blimp dock? 

message: Can we move the page from Bank of America Building (Providence) to 111 Westminster Street , Bank of America vacated the building yesterday (April 12, 2013) at 2PM and the building is now empty. http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013/04/12/superman-building-tallest-now-closed/tsr2pqqC8grmqxb1HsvMTJ/story.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.232.12 (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move 

message: I don't think it's a stretch to say that nobody thinks of this building as "111 Westminster Street".
I suggest we move it to Industrial Trust Building, which is building's the original name. It is more evocative and more commonly used than "111 Westminster Street". example 1, and example 2. Even the New York Times in 2013 said it is "officially called the Industrial National Bank Building".  
Locally, it is widely known as the "Superman Building" and every article about it uses that nomenclature. Even Google Maps calls it the Superman Building. Arguably, it's a dumb name, and certainly not official, but that's what everyone calls it. - Kzirkel (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to "Industrial National Bank Building", since this is the name the New York Times says is "official", and since this garners a few thousand more hits than "Industrial Trust Building". "Superman Building" does garner far more hits than both, though.--Tdl1060 (talk) 06:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "111 Westminster Street" is not what this building is known as
Talk:AFC U-17 Asian Cup

message: This needs updating to reflect 2012 host was Iran (not Uzbekistan).
It also needs updating to highlight AFC member associations in yellow, not generic 'Asia' (this template includes Russia, Israel and Turkey for example, but omits Australia. Matilda Maniac (talk) 03:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've amended to Iran from Uzbekistan.......I'm not sure on the map. Look at AFC Asian Cup and we get a totally different map, shouldn't be be using the same maps across the board? I know these youth events are played more often and prefer the map on here, but shouldn't they be the same? Druryfire (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, by the way, use this to get the co-ordinates for the maps. https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/degrees-minutes-seconds-tofrom-decimal-degrees Druryfire (talk) 23:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Host Map 

message: Medal Summary? they get medals ? are we sure about this? This appears to duplicate the information in the Successful national teams Table immediately above, and using a table format more appropriate to competitions where medals are a large focus, e.g. Olympic Games.  I am wondering more broadly whether we are using these types of tables because the format is there and because we like to compare these sorts of statistics, rather than having any competition-specific meaning?  Any thoughts are welcomed.  Matilda Maniac (talk) 06:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[AFC_U-16_Championship#Medal_summary|Medal Summary?]] 
Talk:Evelyn Pierrepont, 1st Duke of Kingston-upon-Hull

message: It seems strange (to me anyway) that Pierrepont's dukedom would've been created and attached to an area as small as a city like Hull.  Most of the other English dukedoms were attached to duchies on the size of counties (Devonshire, Cornwall, Somerset, Norfolk, etc.) or to other areas considerably larger than just one medium-sized (in the mid-17th c.) city.  Cities were more often attached to English earldoms and marquisates (Queensbury, Bath, Bristol, Winchester, Oxford, etc.)  Does anyone know why Pierrepont's dukedom was for a city, rather than a larger area? Bricology (talk) 07:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Duchy of Hull?
Talk:Eduard Imhof

message: This seems like a nice stub -- but (and I know this sounds stupid) it needs more! Naturally, all stubs need more. But in this case, if I didn't know better, I'd assume this was a vanity page. If the subject weren't already long-dead, this would be suspect: "His fame, which extends far beyond the Institute...," a picture of his signature, and that's it? Even a stub should have a little bit more to justify why this subject merits inclusion. I guess all I'm saying is that I'd rather the work/effort that went into reproducing his autograph here have rather gone into generating a paragraph or two on why he's so notable. If we have time to find, scan, and include graphics, why don't we have time to write more than two sentences on a subject? 
Note: This stub has been around since August 2005. 66.17.118.207 13:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:José C. Uriburu

message: Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #70: "ISBN with wrong length", I removed the ISBN from the entry:
Palacio, Noemí Milagro. (?). Notas sobre: José Camilo Uriburu 1914-1996 cordobés: abogado, industrial y político. ISBN 0327-554
I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBN on the Internet. No Google hits for the book besides this Wiki article. To determine the correct ISBN, we need additional bibliographical information such as publisher and publication year. The author only has one entry on WorldCat for another publication. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad ISBN
Talk:Environment of Azerbaijan

message: Thanks for fixing my poor English mistakes in the article  Megaforcemedia, I really appreciate it buddy :) Baku87 17:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: I wasnt able to find any good information related to game reserves in Azerbaijan, so I dont think it would be usefull to start a article for each game reserve mentioned in the article. Unless anyone else has more usefull information about this please let me know. Baku87 17:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Game Reserves of Azerbaijan 

message: http://enrin.grida.no/htmls/azer/soe/ecology/index.html this is a good site to get your sources from Talyshli 13:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: here another: http://www.ecotourism.aznet.org/naturalobjects/e2.html Talyshli 13:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:José Castro

message: Parts of this article relate to a false narrative about the "independent republic" of California. Accordingly, I added a tag. WCCasey (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And I removed it. See Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 December 27#Help me stop fake California history. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: When I say there was no "California Republic", I mean that although a small group of rebels declared a "California Republic", no further effort was made to actually establish any kind of independent state. There was no constitution, no legislature, no president, no laws, no borders - only a flag. A hoax? No, but the article is misleading (BTW - a newspaper article that mentions the "California Republic" is not evidence of anything). Besides, 1846 has nothing to do with Alvarado, Castro and their coup of 1836. Alvarado's group got further than the 1836 "Bear Flag" revolt, by writing a constitution and declaring Castro president. Again, however, there was never any establishment of an independent government. The coup ended peacefully the next year, with Alvarado acknowledging Mexican authority and becoming the governor appointed by the central government of Mexico. WCCasey (talk) 04:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the California Republic existed has been explained to you before, at Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 December 27#Help me stop fake California history. From The Los Angeles Times: "Although the California Republic was short-lived — it lasted from only June to July 1846..." --Guy Macon (talk) 06:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand by what I said above, which does not contradict the California Republic article (in its current form). That article makes it clear that there was never an independent California with its own government, elected officials, etc. If you look back through the 'California Republic' edit history, you will find the same sort of "independent California" claims that plague this article and others relating to the 1836-1846 years. Thanks to Guy Macon for starting a dialog on this subject at Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Help_needed_with_pseudohistorical_woo. WCCasey (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisionist history 

message: To be reported to Wikipedia administrators: I'm compiling a list of editors/IP addresses that have posted false California history, and tend to give bogus reasons for doing so. WCCasey (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking names
Talk:Chemo Soto

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  feminist (talk) | never forget 07:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: José Chemo Soto →  – Sources seem to support the WP:COMMONNAME is Chemo Soto; doesn't make sense to include both his given name and nickname as the article title. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 May 2022
Talk:1999 Formula One World Championship

message: I think the line 'Schumacher piled on the pressure' is subjective opinion and is not universally agreed as fact. It is contended that Schumacher never intended to overtake Hakkinen as this would gift Irvine the title. 109.148.69.38 (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're suggesting that Schumacher would rather a rival team claim the drivers title? This sounds like a fringe theory, and therefore should not be considered. If it isn't a fringe theory, I would like to see some sources that argue this.SSSB (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last race
Talk:José Dolores Estrada (President of Nicaragua)

message: Please notice that he did not died in 1911. Actually he died in 1939. He got married to Ceferina Zelaya and was the father of four: Jose Dolores, Alfonso Humberto, Irineo (like his brother) and Bertha Margarita.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.212.81.20 (talk) 05:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:José Domingo Molina Gómez

message: Even if the timeline is correct, Peron was in function until the morning of the 20th, and Lonardi declares himself President the same day. elpincha (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a President? 
Talk:Fabian Manning

message: That this article stands as an example of NPOV is appalling. The phrasing of almost every sentence is biased and couched as to place Manning in a less than charitable light. For example, "handily defeated" isn't neutral it sounds jubilant. "Voted out" of caucus is a distortion. Danny Williams refused to have him in caucus because of the stance Manning took on the crab fishery according to media reports. A position that garnered considerable local support for Manning in the subsequent federal election. No mention of the ABC campaign in 2008 despite its notable political impact. 
The two lines I removed were obviously placed there by opposing political party supporters. Not surprising but disappointing they stood there for so long unchallenged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saffron Blaze (talk • contribs) 17:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to re-write the article if you think it is biased. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View 
Talk:José Evaristo Uriburu

message: Wasn't José Evaristo Uriburu a dictator?  He had the title of President but wasn't it through one-party rule?  Stevenmitchell 09:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most definitelly.--Mariano(t/c) 12:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wasn't This Guy a Dictator?
Talk:Seventh-day Adventist theology

message: Thanks for dealing with the sock puppets. I want you to know that I've closely examined the differences between revisions (going back to around August 2017), and much of what your version puts in place was created by User:MindyWaters, who appears to be one of the sockpuppets that you dealt with. In addition, your version removes some legitimate work done by others to fix broken citations. 
I think the solution is to go through the article section by section rather than a wholescale revert. That is more painstaking, but I'm willing to give it a try. I want to make sure you are on board. Tonicthebrown (talk) 14:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Further clarification: the current revision of the article (#842897862) contains material created by User:MindyWaters between #794511149 and #795053680. Tonicthebrown (talk) 14:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the best way to do that is in a subpage to this page. That's done from time to time. How does that sound? And of course that way the unsourced material can be sourced or discarded. But you're right, I seem to have replaced it with Mindy Waters material. I should have gone back to this version. I'd like the opinion of user:Simbagraphix. Doug Weller talk 14:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks for your cooperation.  I've reverted your replacement of material with a 2016 citation needed tag. Once such material is removed it may not be replaced without a reliable source, see WP:BURDEN. I did look at the conference page and found no source in part because I didn't find this statement, which surely should be in that article before it's in this article. If it's significant it should be easy to find a source. Doug Weller talk 13:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: So User:MindyWaters was a sockpuppet, well that explains a lot. I am going through the material and saving what is good, and clean or clarifying the rest. Just have to work through what might be some of her input to see if its salvageable, let me know if any issues.Simbagraphix (talk) 09:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message to Doug Weller
Talk:Roughneck

message: Pretty good article, though there are a few things wrong in the Oilpatch Roughneck section. The Derrickhand does not catch the samples, the worm does this job. Many if not most land based drilling rigs have only a four man crew, so the motorhand, which is more commonly called the Motorman, is the chainhand as well. Throwing the spinning chain is not illegal.
:If you see incorrect facts in the article, by all means, be bold and correct them! :-) --Tkynerd 21:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I dont know about real Marines but in many movies and TV shows Roughnecks is a common term for a Marine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.172.157 (talk) 01:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollywood Marines 

message: I think it should be noted that the term has evolved into the more general definition of anyone (usually masculine) who works a difficult and potentially dangerous blue collar job as well as anyone who fits that description and attitude whether they actually work in such a profession or not. "A tough guy who is rough around the edges -- not overly sophisticated in manner and dress, etc." 71.34.69.172 (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  common usage of the term 

message: Uneducated laborers thought the word tour was pronounced “tower” because they could not spell. Thus oilfield tour is pronounced “tower”. 2600:100E:B084:6BE0:ECC2:B162:B3F2:137F (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tours pronunciation as “towers”
File talk:Radial engine.gif

message: Amazing picture, deserved FA status.--Andeh 13:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow... can't... tear... eyes... away... — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report  14:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is...so hypnotic...ooh... Dev920 22:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, it looks like it's dancing or something. Doesn't help that I'm listening to Sexy Back. Torvik 05:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

message: A truly wonderful image. Bravo! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.44.71 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, great animation. I've always wondered how these worked. Drutt 17:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonderful Image
Talk:Farah Karimi

message: Removed the category "Iranian women's rights activists". There is no reference. --Parastood (talk) 20:27, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Women Rights Activist?

message: Removed the phrase "although from her pictures without the head cover which is usual between female practicing Muslims, it is inferred that she may be a non-practicing Muslim," which is complete bull and unworthy of an encyclopedia. 149.130.221.176 (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:José Luis Oliva Meza

message: I have nominated this article for deletion (see discussion linked from the top of the article) as there seems to be no information forthcoming about this person in a google search other than copies of this article, and no information about other sources that would likely establish notability. If there is anything that establishes this person's notability, please go to the article for deletion page to discuss it. Metaphorazine (talk) 07:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article for Deletion nomination December 2010 
Talk:Farouk al-Sharaa

message: The Telegraph claims that Maher al–Assad, brother of Syrian president Assad shot and wounded Farouq al–Sharaa in 2011. If there is any truth to this, it should be reflected in this article.
* 
-- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tsk, it is also claimed he shot Assef Shawkat, when will people stop taking these ridiculous rumours at face value? FunkMonk (talk) 16:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shot and wounded by Maher al–Assad? 