lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boring Lava Field

message: How could I pass over a title like this, and it was anything but. If I wasn't so stretched I would give a closer read, so just take this as a couple of passing comments,
*Who was Treasher, if we care, and did he just name the townsite and the volcanic field acquired that later. Sometimes there is an interplay in nomenclature, which is otherwise well addressed.
* Do the names of the volcanologists who surveyed the site need mentioning? The information seems uncontentious, and authority beyond the survey seems superfluous.
* The first para of *Physical geography* is about the river systems in the surrounding area, the rest seems to be directly related to the local hydrology (if that is the word I'm looking for).
* Para 1 of *Human history* is backgrounding? I'm unsure of the relevance to the article and imagine this also discussed and maintained in other articles, perhaps some caution to redundancy.
*Regarding biota, lists of taxa can be unwieldy and the inclusion systematic names with the local common name is not something I would push, however, the ecological communities (as they are called in Australia) and protected areas may have those definitive and extensive lists in the relevant articles.
*If high and low-K is mentioned, can a short explanation of whatever that be mentioned. 
Hope these comments are useful, cygnis insignis 04:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  comments 

message: ...this article seems like in a pretty good shape. Is there no pre-1845 history of the region? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I'll see if I can find a little bit more on the Portland area, as there were certainly indigenous people living nearby. ceranthor 15:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  How does the paragraph I added look? ceranthor 22:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems pretty good. I think  it's ready for one of the formal content review processes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per the request on my talk page... 

message: The subsection titled "History", while not without interest, has essentially no relevance to the article's subject (to wit, the Boring Lava Field, who's history is covered in the subsection titled "Eruptive History").  The "History" subsection does not provide any relevant context to the lava field.  In the interest of retaining focus on the actual subject of the article, it should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:300:CA70:F8E3:8A67:E3E:F837 (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, the article isn't just about the volcanological aspects. I'd say it's pertinent information, putting the topic in a regional context. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History subsection should be removed
Talk:Oneonta Gorge

message: I'll be nice about this, and assume someone didn't bother to read the first, and introductory paragraph to this person's great article.  and, if it was read  and a statement about gorges, instead of disagreeing as how to put this into a category correctly, ....  Here's how to remedy anybody's confusion  about how to put this in a category.  Either list it at the beginning with a  "|* " delimiter(Break line w/*), or with a "| ", an empty delimiter.  Or a second obvious choice would be to refer to it on the top of the Category, as an Intro.  After reading the first paragraph, (and the Atricle), I assume it should be just listed with Flora, or put at the Front with a delimiter.  An alternate method is to list it at the end, but I have only done that for some special cases, and this doesn't qualify as any type of special case.  It is simply a "botanic area" as laid out immediately. My personal goals are: .... to keep individuals with their ability to create, while not being blindsided or hindered, by things, ideas, etc. that could get in the way. (And if I can be retrained, almost anybody can)  (from the Sonoran Desert of Arizona)...--Mmcannis 13:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oneonta Gorge botanical area

message: This article would be improved by a pronunciation phrase.  I have heard attempts along the lines of o need ahn tah.  But I think the correct pronunciation is oh KNEE on tah.  This is supported by many at Oregon Hikers field guide.  —EncMstr (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Bendigo Petition

message: While Wikipedia has a very thorough entry on regarding the Eureka Stockade, it contained no references to the closely related agitation for democratic representation and limits to excessive taxation by way of 'License Fees' that had been occurring across the various Victorian goldfields since 1851.
The Forest Creek Monster Meeting in 1851 was the earliest recorded instance of such agitation. It was followed by the Bendigo Petition and Red Ribbon Rebellion, both of which occurred in 1853, for which I have also created entries. 
I am sure that more experienced wikiists would have produced more elegant entries, however at least there is now some information regarding these events on Wikipedia.
Barry221056 07:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 
Talk:Tahmasp II

message: Please stop and edit warring and see https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-5556141/?intObjectID=5556141. It simply says 'Tahmasp' not 'Tahmasp II'. Please take your concerns here. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It said late safavid and on the pictur written tahmasp II Mv1388 (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't say 'Tahmasp II', it simply says 'Tahmasp'. Yes, it does indeed say 'Late Safavid' which is because that's when the picture was made. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: crown of Tahmasp I never same this picture you can see other pictur of tahmasp I and comper this pictur Mv1388 (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Says who? What source do you have for that? Moreover, there's no rule that says a ruler can't have different crowns, nor that a image can't have errors. Ultimately the image doesn't say 'Tahmasp II', and that's what matters. I think our discussion is over. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: if you know persian language on the picture written " شاه طهماسب ثانی" Mv1388 (talk) 14:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Moreover, the exact image can also be found here , where it still simply says 'Tahmasp' and even says '17th Century', a period when Tahmasp II had not even ruled yet. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Tahmasp II
Talk:Ohio State Route 257

message: The ref removed meets the qualification, "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." It is also well sourced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plmerry (talk • contribs) 18:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced reference
Talk:Sagrantino

message: Like several Italian wines, sagrantino is both the name of a wine and that of a grape variety. This article correctly starts by describing the grape variety, but adds details that seem to relate to the wine(s).
Even the picture indicates "Montefalco Sagrantino" which is the correct name of the DOCG wine, not the grape.
There should perhaps be a disambiguation page directing to either Sagrantino (grape) or Montefalco Sagrantino (wine).
Also, two qualities of wine that I know are made with sagrantino: Montefalco Sagrantino (with "secco" and "passito" types) and the "rosso" type of Montefalco DOC. The first was defined a DOC wine only in 1979 and became DOCG in 1992. The Montefalco rosso (DOC from 1979) can use 10% to 75% of sagrantino grape.
(Roberto La Ferla (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Roberto - I've done a little bit of editing around Sagrantino (my favourite grape!) and made Montefalco Rosso redirect to the Montefalco DOC article which I've expanded a bit, as well as the Montefalco Sagrantino article. I'm thinking we should refactor the middle paragraph here, to just refer readers to the two wine articles, and perhaps add a disambig tag at the top. I'd also like to expand the history bit (separate section) with info from the d'Agata Wine Grapes of Italy book, and stuff published by the Consorzio (my Italian is sufficient to get the gist of it, at least!) Interested in your thoughts? Jon (talk) 23:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification and disambiguation 

message: I'd like to hook up this article (and eventually all grape variety articles) to the Wikidata grape variety entries. For instance, this article is referred to in the Sagrantino Wikidata entry, Q1421570. What we really should do is edit Template:Infobox grape variety to hook this up automatically somehow, by just giving it the VIVC number. I recently edited it to just do it manually as an external link to the VIVC database, but to do it properly requires Wikidata fu I don't currently have. If anyone knows how to do that, please get in touch :-) Jon (talk) 23:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikidata grape entities 

message: The USA section of this article needs to be a summary, and is not an opportunity for sales pitches or listings of wineries that make Sagrantino wine, unless it is particularly notable in its own right. Although I'm sure it's lovely wine, the wine competition at the local rodeo down the road is probably not a sufficiently WP:NOTABLE award. Jon (talk) 23:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not a sales brochure, not a business directory
Talk:List of political theorists

message: As this list is almost entirely redundant with and doesn't see nearly the amount of editing activity or discussion as List of political philosophers, I've changed this article into a redirect. Simões (talk/contribs) 07:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, a lot of names here that ought to remain on the new and merged article. --Thorsen 18:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steens Mountain

message: The U.S. National Geodetic Survey lists a benchmark at  , however this is not at the highest point on the mountain. The United States Geological Survey Wildhorse Lake map shows a point nearby with an elevation of  . On this map the benchmark is shown as being at  . –droll [chat] 06:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation 

message: The coordinates given by Peakbagger seem more accurate for the highest point on the mountain than those from GNISS. The GNISS coordinates might will be accurate by some standard and I almost always defer to GNISS but Wikipedia usually gives the coordinates of a mountains summit. This might be a result of a difference in definitions as the Steens have a number of summits. –droll [chat] 05:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:Holding

message: I dont see why Holding (the legal term) is the most relevant article for the word holding; IMO the legal term should be moved to Holding (law) and the dab page moved to Holding.  There are many other uses of this term that have not yet been covered on this dab page, such as library holding. John Vandenberg 08:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  swap holding (dab) and Holding
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gladys the Swiss Dairy Cow (2 nomination)

message: Question about the closing administrator's unusual commentary; "The result was unfortunately, no consensus."  Just for clarification, was the term "unfortunately" meant to convey they wish there was a clear consensus or that their POV was that it should've been kept or deleted?  --Oakshade 08:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He meant, it is a damn shame enough users have chosen to keep this junk. - crz crztalk 14:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd rather the administrator speak for themself, but thanks for the POV. --Oakshade 16:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ask him on his talk page then, not here. Enjoy the POV. - crz crztalk 17:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm choosing to ask here as this is the actual talk page of the AfD that the admin closed. They don't have to answer, but the question was asked.  --Oakshade 17:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Holding (law)

message: I dont see why Holding (the legal term) is the most relevant article for the word holding; IMO the legal term should be moved to Holding (law) and the dab page moved to Holding.  There are many other uses of this term that have not yet been covered on the dab page, such as library holding. John Vandenberg 08:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  swap with Holding (dab)
Talk:Metro Area

message: Mea  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.81.74.131 (talk) 07:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work
Talk:Loftus Versfeld Stadium

message: Isn't Loftus Versfeld misspelt?  I'm under the impression the name requires a "t" at the end: Loftus Versfeldt.
Please comment.
ObseloV (talk) 05:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Versfeld is correct. See the sign outside the stadium :File:South Africa-Pretoria-Loftus Versfeld002.jpg --NJR_ZA (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Versfeldt

message: this is out of date, work "may begin" in "early 2007"? Farannan (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction due...

message: Is Loftus Versfeld Stadium the actual name of the ground? I've been a semi-dedicated Blue Bull fan for a couple years now (though in the US, not South Africa) and I've never heard it called that. It's always Loftus Versfeld. Even the official logo of the stadium uses no suffix, and all Blue Bulls website references also do not use the suffix. In lieu of better evidence, I believe the proper name is simply Loftus Versfeld, with no suffix, like Lansdowne Road or Carisbrook. PsychedelicCeltic 08:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stadium
Talk:Stardust (band)

message: I've proposed that this be merged into Music Sounds Better with You.  If you have any thoughts, please discuss at Talk:Music Sounds Better with You#Merge proposal (May 2020), rather than on this page. TSP (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Thomas Howard, 2nd Duke of Norfolk

message: There is some confusion here.  Howard's daughter Dorothy, married to Edward Stanley, is given three parents (she's listed under both of his wives).  In Stanley's article she is this Howard's grand-daughter, the daughter of his son Thomas Howard, which seems more likely to me (going by their ages).  Also the relationship between Agnes Tilney and Catherine Howard (Queen consort) is incorrect.  It's all confusing when they all used the same names over and over again, from generation to generation, and even within generations, eh?  I'll try and check into and fix this soon as i get time.  Lindsay H. 08:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the error.  According to Burke, he clearly states Dorothy Howard as the daugther of Agnes Tilney.  Virgosky 15:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Confusion

message: Thomas was created Earl of Surrey in 1483 but lost his title in 1485. The box at the bottom of the page does not reflect the fact that he was stripped of his title in 1485 and did not get the title back until 1489. Can someone rectify this? -- Lady Meg (talk) 22:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Thao & the Get Down Stay Down

message: This page is in the process of expansion.  The band does indeed exist; this is not a vanity page.  Amiaheroyet 08:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the article looks much better since I first tagged it. Sorry for the quick trigger there. -- Shadowlynk 09:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we get the diacritics for her name? Badagnani (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diacritics

message: Why exactly is this article part of WikiProject Vietnam?  I understand that Thao is Vietnamese, or at the very least of Vietnamese descent, but this article is about an American music group.  Putting this article in WPVN seems like a tremendous stretch to me.  It's analogous to putting Theory of Relativity in WikiProject Germany simply because Einstein was German.  I may be wrong, as I'm by no means an expert on Thao Nguyen, this band, or Vietnam, but it seems to me this tie is tenuous at best.  Does the group play Vietnamese-inspired music or support Vietnam related causes?  I'm simply trying to understand the connection, as the article itself gives no plausible explanation.  In fact, the word "Vietnam" doesn't even appear in the article.  Thank you in advance to anyone who can clarify this for me. 64.15.81.27 (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Vietnam

message: Thao with the Get Down Stay Down →  – Although the band was once named Thao With The Get Down Stay Down it has now be determined that the band would wish to be called Thao & The Get Down Stay down. The band' social media and main website have already been changed and now Wikipedia is all that is left to update. See the band's google news results here: https://www.google.com/search?q=she+and+him+wikipedia&oq=she+and+him+wikipedia&sugexp=chrome,mod=0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=thao+and+the+get+down&hl=en&prmd=imvns&source=univ&tbm=nws&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=iMKSUK-tEuiviQLf6YGICg&ved=0CHsQqAI&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=a3f712a0cb56aa20&bpcl=37189454&biw=1260&bih=814
199.116.73.107 (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable.  a13ean (talk) 20:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Meersburg

message: I've capitalized the 'lake' in Lake Constance for the proper name, and changed 'wineyards' to 'vineyards'.  I describe the B31 more as a roadway than a street, since 'street' connotes something that's purely in a town, with rather slow going.  Most of the B31 allows quite good speeds, only slowing when one gets into a major town.  I changes the section called Wining to Viticulture.  Viticulture is the growing of the vines and grapes as well as supplying the wine industry.  We did love our stop in Meersburg, by the way...thank you for adding this entry  LTC David J. Cormier (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper name

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Meiningen

message: BAD article for this historical town!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.128.214.194 (talk) 13:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theatre, Elisabethenburg, English Garden etc 

message: Many famous actors of Germany began her career in Meiningen. Maybe someone can add a list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.214.144.186 (talk) 11:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More actors from the Meiningen Theatre
Talk:Meßkirch

message: The title of this article should probably be changed to Messkirch within the English Wikipedia, as the eszett (ß) isn't part of the Latin alphabet. (All too many English readers will think it's a "B".) See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Foreign terms. --RevWaldo 21:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglicized Spelling 
Template talk:Dukes of Gloucester

message: Isn't the order wrong here?  Shouldn't it go from oldest to newest?
--82.143.195.87 08:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, none of the other British royal titles templates do - but I'm soon to start a discussion thereof at BRoy Talk, so do please join in! – DBD 12:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Memmingen

message: the pictures of the flag, coat of arms and townhall were replace with a picture of a random person
Could someone please fix this. Im currentlx on my phone 185.104.136.50 (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong pictures
Talk:Merseburg

message: I would like to suggest that you discuss the history of the holdings of the East German portion of the Geheimes Staatsarchiv Preußischer Kulturbesitz, formerly held in an archives building (which I visited several times) in Merseburg.  The part that I have in mind is that portion of the archives found in East Germany during the time of the German Democratic Republic.  These archives "belonged" to the Geheimes Staatarchiv Preußischer Kulturbesitz (which was in West Berlin) and was returned to that institution in 1993/1994.  See https://www.gsta.spk-berlin.de/geschichte_und_gegenwart_431.html.  It is my understanding that the building in Merseburg, which housed those holdings, now houses the archives of East German companies, many no longer in existence, but you would have to verify that.  There were, of course, several other provincial and/or local archives in Merseburg.  I do not know what happened to those holdings and never visited them, but I suppose that they continue their functions as before.
Mr. Posen (talk) 19:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archives in Merseburg
Talk:Metzingen

message: The line about Politics in the Metzingen article: Now, let me guess how politically informative that one is. Beurk !  msh 05 / Dez / 2015  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.147.105 (talk) 09:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

message: Isn't "Cohenstead Noyon" the full official name of Metzingen twin town Noyon - the birthstead of John Calvin an crypto Jew whose lastname was originally Cohen, then Cauin, and lastly Calvin...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:226:8FF:FEDC:FD74 (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cohenstead Noyon
Talk:Mindelheim

message: "The principality of Mindelheim ... covered an area of 15 square miles".
According to Map of the Principality of Mindelheim 
and to Bayern I: Bayern 1777
it was considerably larger, I guess around 70 square miles or 200 square kilometres.
Maproom 21:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Adult puppeteering

message: Hmmm, doesn't "Farscape" belong on the list, too? Hierophany 08:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This isn't supposed to include stop motion-animated films or series, right?  Because technically that's not puppetry. Esn 11:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oh wait...

message: I think that this article should mention Being John Malkovich because puppeteering played a major role in that film. That film dealt with some rather adult themes and included very dark humor so I think it might be appropriate to include in this article.-Schnurrbart (talk) 02:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being John Malkovich 

message: Shouldn't this be titled something like "Adult puppetry"? "Adult puppeteering" sounds like its focus is on the age of the puppeteer, not the content. Trivialist (talk) 01:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Marine transfer operations

message: Hi,
I think there is a problem with the interwiki links. They go to Horse in other langage. CaptainHaddock 08:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki links 