lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hot swap

message: I want to use mobile rack with hot swap.
Is it neccessary for my mainboard to support hot swap capability if my mobile rack does? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.232.92.242 (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2003 (UTC)

message: Somehow a names needs to be chosen and hot swap and hot swapping need to be combined.
:: any progress on this? --193.1.100.102 08:13, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I think that the article should be "hot swappable" as this is the most frequent description — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4012359 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Both should just redirect to "hot swappable" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.200.171 (talk) 05:35, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Hot swappable" would not only be the most logical choise, but it's also correct english, "hot swap" woudn't be correct... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arp242 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hot swap vs Hot swapping
Talk:Nutrition science

message: People are fat because they eat too many calories.  
First of all, the human body needs calories to maintain its well being, its status quo.  Secondly, the human body needs calories to grow new muscle, nerve and bone tissue in order to be stronger. Thirdly,  the human body needs calories to refill its storage facvities in order to insure a constant availability of calories.
The human body does not need to take in calories in excess of its needs even though the mind wants to eat.  
Obesity is like alcoholism in that the fat people have this compulsion to eat as the alcoholic has the compulsion to drink alcohol.  Some alcohol is beneficial as evidenced by the healthy effects of drinking red wine, but alcoholism produces a totally different type of consumption.
Similarly, eating prevents starvation and wasting away.  It is far necessary to take in calories to prevent starvation then to drink wine to prevent heart disease.  But eating oneself into obesity is as detrimental as alcoholism.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Garygromet (talk • contribs) 17:09, 18 November 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causes of Obesity (opinion)
Talk:Amiga Original Chip Set

message: Did the Amiga 2500 ship with OCS or ECS or AGA?? --Tonsofpcs 21:23, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The "A2500" is just a marketing name for an A2000 bundled with an accelerator card (also available separately). So it shipped with whatever A2000s were shipping with at the time. Mirror Vax 00:18, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A2500 

message: My early 1985 A1000 (which would go very high on ebay) does NOT have Original Chip Set, but Initial Chip Set! So I would not say that OCS is the very first chip set of the Amiga. -andy 85.176.228.48 (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICS (Initial Chip Set) 

message: I had one of the earliest A500s, and I remember opening the case.  I'm pretty certain that there was also a chip labelled GARY on the motherboard.  I seem to remember reading about the chipset (in Amiga Format or Commodore World), and I think Gary did the I/O.  We should not forget about Gary. Jason404 (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started Amiga custom chips to point out the other members of the team. ;-) Zac67 (talk) 21:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to Gary?? 

message: Rename this page from "Original Chip Set" to "Amiga Original Chip Set".  Most of the other Amiga chipset pages are titled as "Amiga ..." which conveniently groups them together on the Category:Graphics chips listing. OCS is floating out there alone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.184.5.252 (talk) 14:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Musaran (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider Renaming? 

message: The copper description says that after modifying sprite registers the sprite "will be drawn again, even on the same scanline." Is this really correct? Don't we need to wait for the next scanline to get a DMA slot for new sprite data? Ebenupton (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That is somewhat correct: the sprite can be reused within the very same scanline, but the DMA channel can't fetch new data – the cloned sprite will look exactly like the 1st one. Zac67 (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sprites on the same scanline
Talk:West Bengal

message: Please share your thoughts and comments on, discussion about replacing infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory on Indian states and union territories pages. Discussion:- Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
This infobox is customised for Indian states and union territories. It gives more specific, constant, described  and dedicated information. 
Template:Infobox Indian state or territory. Tojoroy20 (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we replace Infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory in Indian states and union territories pages ? 

message: The  used on this page is going to be replaced with  as per the Proposal and Consensus of RFC. Any questions/suggestions? Discuss Here.
You can also contribute by replacing Infobox settlement with Infobox Indian state or territory on other pages , or by improving this one. Tojoroy20 (talk) 20:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced —  Tojoroy20 (talk) 21:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox replacement 
Talk:Pine squirrel

message: This page needs to grow, and then to split off two subsidiary pages, one for each species - there is plenty known about each of them
seglea 21:56, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: T. Hudsonicus
T. douglasii
T. mearnsi
As per this source
http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/browse.asp?id=12400001
and as per this source
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1383712
The article doesn't mention T. mearnsi
--Davefoc (talk) 07:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and change the article's text to include all three species, based on Thorington & Hoffmann. --Saukkomies talk  15:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: There seem to be three species of Tamiasciurus
Talk:Strike

message: This looks more like a dictionary entry than an encyclopedia article.
--Noldoaran 22:18, Nov 18, 2003 (UTC)
----
We need to put in a section about strike relating to coinage.
: Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages).  This page is not where new wikipedia stuff should go.  New wikipedia entries, should they merit inclusion, should be written, and when they have ambiguous names, they should have links on disambiguation pages. Tedernst | talk 23:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: * The strike of a geological unit is the compass direction along the plane of the unit where the unit has zero dip. As any surface that is not horizontal will have two such directions, convention states that the direction of strike is taken as counter-clockwise from the dip-direction.
The dip page was also a messed-up dab so not much help.  There is an entry there on escarpment that talked about strike-slip, but since this is a dab page, I see no reason to think anyone would end up here looking for that page. Tedernst | talk 23:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: removed entry

message: Note: i've cleaned up and restored this page back to a generic topic disambiguation page, instead of a redirect to Strike action:  the latter is not a primary topic.  (See the disambiguation page naming conventions.)  --Piet Delport 04:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I've just (re-)added/merged data from Strike (disambiguation) to this article. This article should indeed be the disambiguation article and strike should not redirect to Strike action, since there are many other meanings of "strike". Before cleaning up most of the list of the former article Strike (disambiguation), please first discuss the removal of entries here on the discussion page. This article is still not as it should be but in progress of becoming more comprehensive. Probably some entries could be put under a "see also" heading. Et cetera. Best regards, --Brz7 00:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The entries i removed should be uncontroversial:  disambiguation pages should only list topics that are ambiguously referred to as "strike", not titles that merely contain "strike", such as Strikebreaker, Strike Gundam, Strike price, and Striking clock;  see Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Lists.  (The list of specific strike actions i removed are discussed and accessible under Strike action, and not usually referred to ambiguously.)  --Piet Delport 05:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generic topic disambiguation
Talk:Pronouns

message: someone not logged in had created this page, not realising there was already a pronoun page.  I have shifted the material to the pronoun page, and set up a redirect.  arguably we shouldn't do that because it's just a plural but it seemed more polite to the author who will at least now see what's happened to his/her nice new page
seglea 22:31, 18 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Semmering railway

message: Someone with an active interest and good English should comb this article a bit. Too late for me now, gotta sleep! :) --Gutza 00:19, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: Can some one please insert this in the infobox rail line of this article under Map? Peter Horn 22:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And add "map caption" to Template:Infobox rail line? Peter Horn 23:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Never mind, I managed to get the map in place myself and I noticed that "map caption" is not needed in this template. Peter Horn 20:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:John F. Kennedy International Airport

message: Aeroflot service shouldnt be removed as their is no indication that service wont return
DisneyAviationRollerCoasterEnthusiast (talk) 18:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian Airplanes are banned from entering United States Airspace therefore Aeroflot cannot fly into JFK 108.50.206.142 (talk) 22:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, they’re banned right now but there’s nothing telling us that the routes won’t come back eventually. No need to remove them when we can just list them as suspended. (VenFlyer98 (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

text: I agree. This is clearly a situation where the return of service would require a significant change to come back any time soon. They're more than just suspended, they're banned. If the chart is supposed to represent the current routes at the airport, including routes that haven't flown for over a year and would require a major change in real-world geopolitical events to begin again doesn't fulfill that purpose. There's no reason for keeping them here without engaging in CRYSTALBALL speculation. oknazevad (talk) 00:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aeroflot suspension  

message: Like to propose adding that the robberies/ heists covered under this section inspired the 1990 film Goodfellas. 173.59.118.212 (talk) 20:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major robberies section
Talk:1014

message: These 'historical year' pages can all be added to, simply by googling "1014 A.D." etc. Wetman 01:12, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Volcano

message: Neev Patel 69 (talk) 04:15, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Aoi (青い) (talk) 04:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Pls let me edit Flopybunny (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2022 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rt2510 (talk) 00:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

message: Unless if there is no way how to treat such. - S L A Y T H E - (talk) 13:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there first aid information about volcanism-related injuries? 

message: I suggest adding the following terminology
:Polygenetic volcanoes are those that have more than one period of activity during their history. Those that become extinct after erupting exactly once are called monogenetic (meaning "one life").
It doesn't have to be exactly this sentence (you can reword it as you wish). 
Related:
* Category:Monogenetic volcanoes
* Category:Polygenetic volcanoes
* Monogenetic volcanic field
* Polygenetic volcanic field
Reason: I want to add internal Wiki-links (double square brackets) that guide users to the definitions of "monogenetic volcano" and "polygenetic volcano". These terms are clearly defined in the category pages Category:Monogenetic volcanoes and Category:Polygenetic volcanoes but Wikipedia links to category pages are discouraged. I encountered these terms but had to leave Wikipedia article space to find clear definitions. This is the problem that I want this edit to solve.
I think this terminology would fit well in the "Volcanic activity" section. But perhaps someone can suggest a better section (or different article) to mention these terms? 
(I am an autoconfirmed user and so if there are no objections, I can make the edit myself. I'm only looking for input from other editors before I make this addition.). Mgkrupa Mgkrupa 17:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and will make sure this is added. I have already corrected incorrect implications of wording in safety section. I will also look at the unreferenced section on history of volcanology which seems irrelevant to this article ChaseKiwi (talk) 15:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested edit: Monogenetic/Polygenetic volcanoes 

message: The heading is off topic. I have not added off topic template which was my first reaction as actually what is needed is a complete rewrite as a History of Volcanoes section with references to total misconceptions, before there was a science of volcanology.  ChaseKiwi (talk) 15:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History of volcanology section

message: pls lemme edit 96.27.136.162 (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024
Talk:Proust questionnaire

message: Deletion for copyright infrigements?
Proust has died in 1922. The copyright laws are clear on that. The law in France for french authors is that the text is falling in Public Domain 70 years after the death of the author.
1922 + 70 = 1992. So I think that we are in the scope of your license.
--KarlDubost (http://www.la-grange.net/)
:Given your information on French copyright I think you're probably right that it's not a violation on that score; however I think the article in its present form is probably inappropriate as being a (bare, uncommented) source text. - Hephaestos 02:21, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'd agree with that. Sorry for being so hasty labelling it as copyvio. It would be best to write about the questionnaire, and provide an external link to the actual questionnaire, or even better, put a copy at http://ps.wikipedia.org (which is a wiki for source texts) and link to that. Angela 02:25, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:List of Baptist denominations

message: I was wondering if anyone knows of a "Hungarian Baptist" denomination in the United States of America. I know there used to be a Baptist church in my town whose services were in Hungarian, but it became defunct in the 1960's. I don't know what denomination it belonged to, and I was wondering if there was a Hungarian Baptist denomination in the USA at one time. GnatFriend (talk) 09:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Defunct Denomination
Talk:Timeline of Canadian history (1941-1964)

message: Wouldn't better to rename this article to Timeline of Canadian history (1941-1964)? --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 05:06, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this page, because i think this name is more appropriate (See Timeline of United States history (1600-1699)). If no one disapproves of it, I will move all Timeline of Canadian history- XXXX-XXXX to Timeline of Canadian history (XXXX-XXXX). BTW, that's the standard of dividing years? why 1941-1964 but not 1940-1960 or 1900s? --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 10:05, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:New Age Ancient Near East Chronology

message: It seems this page is more about alternative ideas about sea-people than anything to do with New Age Ancient Near East Chronologies. I don't know if Velikovsky (it was not Rohl's idea), nor Rohl for that matter, can really be classified as New-Age or rather simply non-conventional or at worst anti-establishment. How about filling this page out a bit with some more really zany ideas which are in existence out there concerning middle-eastern chronologies for example the Alien origin theories.
----
from VfD
* New Age Ancient Near East Chronology -- The body of the article is unrelated to the title and the rest is demeaning in Kenneth Kitchen-ite style thus neither is is NPOV. Any useful relevant info can be moved to relevant pagest such as Sea Peoples and Phoenicians while the rest is already said in a much more objective & detailed manner on the David Rohl page. Zestauferov 08:29, 27 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:1872 in the United States

message: By creating this article I just realized that there is actaully no need for seperate 'year in U.S.' articles.  Most of the year articles are almost all about the United States already. - SimonP 07:25, Nov 19, 2003 (UTC)
: All the more reason to create them! By moving lots of the stuff off them that is only relevant to the US, you would enable the usual year pages to become more global in their outlook. :) Oh, but how about "United States" instead of "U.S.", for consistency with the name given to the United States article? It probably doesn't matter either way. It's just a suggestion... -- Oliver P. 09:51, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vanity of Duluoz

message: This is a blog, not a Wikipedia entry. A better title: Vanity entry of 207.6.172.54 Wetman 09:16, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it true (as I read recently) that Kerouac's star had fallen by this time to the point where he had difficulty getting the book published?Meltingpot (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Publishing

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Duluoz Legend and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Duluoz Legend until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Duluoz Legend" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Phelsuma

message: 459 references for a 300 word article?  Something is out of balance here! -- Michael Tinkler, sticking his toe back in wikipedia after a year off
The reasons I added this rather long reference list to the main Phelsuma article are:
#that this main Phelsuma page links to many articles on Phelsuma species. In many of the listed references, more than one species is described, so I would have to duplicate those references many times (for each described species), which seems a waste of disk space. I would rather link each reference (record) to the different articles (other records), like a relational database, but alas wikipedia doesn't allow for this.
#If one wants to read more about this genus, this list is a starting point. 
We could of course create a new article "Phelsuma literature".
Jurriaan 12:09, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should we add something about the fact that the Gieco Gecko is a day gecko? 1 wit da force 15:36, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gieco Gecko 

message: Article titled "Phelsuma", but starts off with "Day Geckos are small lizards of the genus Phelsuma in the gecko family.". Since article is titled Phelsuma, I'm wondering why article doesn't start with "Phelsuma". Article used to start as "Phelsumas are small lizards which are also known as day geckos." (Change start to "Phelsuma genus consists of various types of Day Geckos." ?) --EarthFurst (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  article name and start of article 

message: Is it /ˈfɛlsʊmə/ or /fɛlˈsuːmə/? (Or something else…) 85.211.45.101 (talk) 02:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Common dolphin

message: Apparently there are only two (maybe three) recognized species and a bunch of other species that are actually just varieties such as Delphinus fitzroyi. The article should list all the species names in use and let the reader now into what species the one they are looking for has currently been clumped. All the names in use should be shown. Jason Quinn (talk) 13:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other "species" such as ''Delphinus fitzroyi'' 

message: It seems that these mainly inhabit salt water, but I read that they are in the Bronx River.  Please comment in the article about their inhabiting rivers or other fresh water.CountMacula (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salt or fresh water?
Talk:D with stroke (disambiguation)

message: &Eth; and Đ are two different characters, as described in the disambiguation article.
However, the disambiguation article uses the Eth codepoint as the address.
-- Zhen Lin 14:32, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No. For me, the bar in Đ is placed higher than the bar in Ð. Kairos 10:01, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the bar in Đ is supposed to be in the vertical middle. Is that so on your display? --Shallot 14:13, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not quite. The bar in Đ is placed slightly above the middle on my display. It's fairly difficult to notice, but when you look at them side-by-side, it's apparent. Maybe it's just my font. Kairos 13:21, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  In my font Đ is also narrower, FYI 202.180.83.6 05:25, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Older discussions

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
* Support Dijxtra 21:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support: I'd rather see the other Đ's redirected to the disambiguation page.  But if that doesn't happen, then it's only fair to redirect the D with stroke page to its appropriate article. DHN 17:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support: I'd rather see the other Đ's redirected to the disambiguation page.  But if that doesn't happen, then it's only fair to redirect the D with stroke page to its appropriate article. DHN 17:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move