Talk:Baron Bergavenny

message: I am not certain this is correct. Bergavenny was originally a barony by tenure, and then separated from the lands. The daughter of the 2nd Marquess did not become co-heirs to the barony, and as far as I know, the current Marquess (6th) is the new Baron Bergavenny. wikibiohistory 15:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The barony by writ of 1397 is presumably in abeyance, if the usual rules apply to it.  A barony by tenure presumably depends on the ownership of the lands held by the tenure of being one of the king's (or queen's) barons.  However feudal tenures were abolished at the English Restoration.  Accordingly an English (or Welsh) barony by tenure can hardly be regarded as more than an honorary position attached to the ownership of land.  The question thus probably becomes that of who is the lord of the manor of Abergaveny.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the title not be Baron of Abergavenny or Lord of Abergavenny, not Baron Abergavenny until the barony became a barony by writ?  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barony by tenure 

message: I've massively rewritten the article to explain how things have worked legally. And unless I'm missing something, I don't see how any creation could have fallen into abeyance in 2000: the 5th Marquess was not heir general of the 1st Marquess. Proteus (Talk) 17:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul

message: The de facto 11th Baron has no de jure title, although he's the father of the de facto 12th/de jure 1st Baron? Shouldn't the 11th be the 1st of that de jure creation?--78.50.155.156 (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 11th baron de facto

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Baron Bergavenny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120506184055/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1392.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1392.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331185304/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1604.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1604.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331185314/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1641.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1641.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331185346/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1695.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1695.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331185819/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/index2174.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/index2174.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Baron Bergavenny. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120506184119/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1450.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1450.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331185323/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1662.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/Abergavenny1662.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The above-named is treated as de jure 3rd Baron of the 1695 creation by writ. He died on 15 November 1723. He had posthumous children by Elizabeth, twin girls born on 20 November 1723, both of whom died on 1 December 1723. If he held a barony by writ, which could descend to females, then: -
1. Did it go into 'suspended animation' on his death on 15 November, until the result of his widow's pregnancy became clear?
2. Did it go into abeyance between his daughters on their birth on 20 November?
3. Did the abeyance terminate on the death of the first daughter to die on 1 December? 
4. Was the surviving daughter briefly 3rd Baroness of the 1695 creation by writ? Compare Charles Brandon, 3rd Duke of Suffolk who died on the same day as his brother and is counted as having been a duke for an hour.
5.  Was the girls' uncle Edward Nevill, 15th Baron Bergavenny 4th Baron of the 1695 creation by writ?
Alekksandr (talk) 13:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: George Nevill, 14th Baron Bergavenny