lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rescue from Gilligan's Island

message: I noticed the article says the professor makes a barometer to predict a tidal wave. A tidal wave has nothing to do with weather. Is this an error in the WIKI writing or was that the actual plot from the show and the writers of the show goofed?
4.130.1.37 (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you kidding me? You're disputing the scientific accuracy of Gilligan's Island? 70.185.226.203 (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in plot or Wiki?

message: I noticed that the information for this movie was almost non-existant.  Having just watched it, I decided to try to make it much more complete.  I will try and add some more information at a later date.  Mushrom 02:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Revision

message: Now I don't have to sit through it, but somebody fix the typos, pleez.! --Sugarcaddy 02:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: Anyone have any details about how the film fell into the public domain? Sherwood Schwartz doesn't strike me as the type to be so forgetful as to renew a copyright.
Ttenchantr (talk) 04:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright lapse?

message: where exactly does this occur?  i have the movie and this is nowhere to be found.  unless my copy is some sort of pared-down/edited for TV version (quite possible -- it's 1:30 w/o credits or commercials, does that jibe?), this seems to be incorrect.
is it supposed to be during the HI welcome or the LA one?  this article doesn't even MENTION the latter, so i'm skeptical of other details claimed.  209.172.23.223 (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullhorn?
Category talk:20th Century Fox films

message: I think it's wise to maintain a separate category named "20th Century Fox films" for films produced 1935–2020. This would maintain their distinct historical identity, and match categories for films produced by earlier iterations of the studio, :Category:Twentieth Century Pictures films and :Category:Fox Film films. These can be subcategorized under "20th Century Studios films"; please see Commons category:20th Century Studios films. — WFinch (talk) 04:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion has moved here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#20th Century Fox films. — WFinch (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th Century Fox films
Talk:Željko Šturanović

message: ==Untitled==
I know he hasn't formally been introduced as the new prime minister, but he is a given. Feel free to change it to the official status, if you wish.--Thomas.macmillan 02:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I know he hasn't formally been introduced as the new prime minister, but he is a given. Feel free to change it to the official status, if you wish.--Thomas.macmillan 02:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kyle of Lochalsh

message: "Palin traveled by various trains from London to the furthest north point by rail, Kyle of Lochalsh".  Furthest point north by rail would be Thurso, surely? Draggleduck (talk) 03:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Michael Palin

message: Was the village / locality ever known as "Kyle of Lochalsh" before the railway arrived in 1897 (the proposals for same having first been considered in the 1860's)? Manchester Warrior (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyle of Lochalsh placename? 

message: HOPEFULLY ALL SAMUEL'S 1 91.73.76.56 (talk) 09:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  HOPEFULLY ALL SAMUEL'S 1
Talk:Have a Nice Day, Volume 11

message: Does anyone know why this particular CD is worth so much?  I have seen it go for as much as $95 on some websites (seems strange for a Rhino CD compilation); the others in the series usually go for about $4-$10.  I would think this might be worthwhile posting in this article.162.39.190.225 (talk) 23:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Collectible?
Talk:Ling-Ling

message: Ling-Ling's Death's should be noted either here or on it's own page. If you do not do this then I will do it myself any ways and once I do may some one please send the picture's over because it could use as much pictures as possible.
(User:Healthinspector)
:The list of Ling-Ling deaths can be found at Running gags on Drawn Together. There was a separate page for the list of housemates deaths, but it was merged into the page mentioned above. At one point, there was a separate page for just Ling-Ling's deaths, but it eventually reached the point where all the housemates were getting killed off so often, it was expanded into the List of Housemate Deaths page. We could always add Ling-Ling's deaths to this page, but there isn't a need to make a separate page for them.Raymondluxuryacht 03:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths

message: It should be noted that the L-R gag wasn't around when the show first aired. In Hot Tub, he says his name as "Ling-Ling" twice, instead on "Ring-Ring" as he says in newer episodes. He also says "Ling-Ling" and his full name "Ling-Ling Ling" in  Gay Bash. DSMeatte 08:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not really any consistency to it. Sometimes he pronounces it fine, sometimes he gets it wrong. It just depends on what they think is funnier in any given line.Raymondluxuryacht 09:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engrish 

message: How do you know if it's Japanese Gibberish? I have feeling it could be a fictional Asian language. TheBlazikenMaster 08:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not quite what the article is saying. It's not Japanese at all. It's complete gibberish that just sounds vaguely Japanese. The voice actress has stated that she makes it up on the spot imitating Asian vocal sounds.Raymondluxuryacht 09:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, so that's why I'm asking why we shouldn't call it a fictional Asian language. TheBlazikenMaster 09:54, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We do. The article describes it as "Japorean", which is the term the show people use for it.Raymondluxuryacht 15:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ling-Ling's language. 

message: Guess what? "Ling" is a Chinese word that means "sympathetic", "compassionate" or "understanding", which is sorta ironic considering Ling-Ling is devious and cruel for a good portion of the series, with little respect for anyone else.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.100.210.88 (talk) 02:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ironic much
Talk:Fort Davis Junior-Senior High School

message: :Fort Davis High School → ? – I feel that the name of this article should be changed to the official FDISD name, "Fort Davis Jr./Sr. High School". However, "Fort Davis Junior/Senior High School", or "Fort Davis Junior High/Senior High School" might work better. NNPOC (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What title should be used?
Talk:Jane Connell

message: These two do not comprise an acting team. Why were they lumped together - simply because they're a married couple? I believe each should have had a separate entry. SFTVLGUY2 15:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I followed this link from the Ladybug Ladybug (film) entry I just created in which she starred. According to this article, these two people have only appeared together in one production. They should be split up into their own article. - Jmartinsson 19:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Divide article?
Talk:James R. Jones

message: Here is another article for the Oklahoma Wiki Project; we need to expand this one.  I would like to see some more on his work as U.S. Ambassador to Mexico.  I will find the appropriate succession box and insert it in this article.  ProfessorPaul 02:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another article for "the Project"
Talk:Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences

message: I study at the FCEyN and I'm almost sure the degree equivalent you get after the six years programs is Master of Science, not Bachelor. Hope someone could assure and fix this. --24.232.108.31 02:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I finished my Licenciatura there, and sadly, in spite of the 6 year long studies, it is considered a bachlor's; at least in the States. Mariano(t/c) 06:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I think that a more correct translation for "facultad" is school (sorry for the english, I'm from argentina)
JoseRMendez (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faculty?
Talk:Aerosol science

message: Might i suggest a nice definition of what aerosol science actually is before jumping into a complicated equation? Like: Aerosol science is the field of science concerned with the modelling and measurement of aerosol particles.--Ryanmoffet 22:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I am trying to tidy up the aerosol page to make it more than just about atmospheric aerosols. I need a section in that article which covers the material here, and so I will merge them soon unless someone objects.--NHSavage (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of Aerosol Science 

message: The topic of aerosol science is not clearly distinguished from aerosol at present and is not much more than a stub. I propose to merge the content from this article to aerosol next Saturday 28th July unless there is any opposition expressed here.--NHSavage (talk) 19:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merge to aerosol
Talk:University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine

message: Shouldn't this be merged into the main Pitt article? Is there that much to say about the Dental school? Passdoubt| Talk 02:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, each separate school has a lot of detail, and therefore deserves a separate article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 03:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged?
Talk:Robert de Montesquiou

message: This article needs more work. There's hardly any information on the guy, and a poem in French doesn't help--an English translation should be provided, otherwise it is of no use to the reader of an English-language encyclopedia.Snowgrouse (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a poem sample, and will be adding more information on him from time to time.  SwampT (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no doubt lots of sources in French, relating to Proust, Wilde, Bernhardt and others of his author, theatre and nobility friends, where he's likely to turn up. I have a book on Proust at hand where he figures at length, and the author is clearly knowledgeable, she's a faculty professor of French literatuire and has written extensively and engagingly on Proust and his world (in Swedish. maybe some in French too). Part of the trouble is that the people who knew Robert de Montesquiou were fond of embellishing reality - he was too I think. I seem to recall he's the guy whose posthumous, scandal-prone memoirs elicited this remark from a noble lady friend: "You have the right to expect more from a dead man!" So, one can't just accept all the things said about him by one or two acquaintances or their friends and children. 83.254.158.105 (talk) 23:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Work needed
Talk:I6

message: I changed the article from a disambiguation page back to a redirect page.  All the articles with a link to I6 were linking here for the engine, so having this as a disambiguation page meant that 100 articles would have to be repaired.  This seems like needless work when no articles were attempting to link to Sky Eyes Airlines.  If someone creates a page for the airline, we can always add a dab reference to the Straight 6 page or revert my change.-Kubigula (ave) 03:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert to redirect
Talk:Constant amplitude zero autocorrelation waveform

message: I redirected this article to complex number as it has no content. Please feel free to revert the redirect but then expand the article to actually have some information. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My redirect

message: Thanks for patching this up, Jitse, but I'm not sure the definition makes sense yet. It seems that if the signal were truly periodic then the autocorrelation would have to be positive, and not zero. I did notice that the word "polyphase" appears in a lot of titles of articles that refer to "cazac" ... I suppose that the cazac signal has to be the sum of at least two signals that are permanently out of phase (i.e., the multiple "periods" are incommensurate). Does that make sense?  DavidCBryant 00:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Periodic?
Talk:Machine Empire

message: Formal request has been received to merge King Mondo into Machine Empire. Rationale: The character's article is mostly plot, most of the sources are just the series episodes, and the little information about his other appearances or merchandises can easily be added to the target article. 69.118.34.185 (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Cantor distribution

message: This article currently states:
:...it is not absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure,...
which is strictly true but awkwardly worded, misleading. The Cantor distribution, treated as a measure (shall we call it the "Cantor measure"?) is not absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure.  However, the Cantor distribution, treated as an "ordinary function", is absolutely continuous (with no reference to a measure), as currently defined in the article on absolute continuity. That is, for any ε>0 there exists a δ>0 such that any interval shorter than δ has max(f(x)) - min(f(x)) < ε on that interval. Indeed, for ε = 2-n then δ = 3-n-1 satisfies the definition given in the article on absolute continuity.  I think these two contrasting results are sufficiently confusing that maybe the wording whould be chosen more carefully. I'd do it myself, except that I'm tired just right now, and fear making a mistake.linas (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for clarification 

message: The article currently states "It is easy to see by symmetry that for a random variable X having this distribution, its expected value E(X) = 1/2, and that all odd central moments of X are 0."  Is this adequate without a demonstration that the mean is finite (e.g., by symmetry, the standard Cauchy distribution has mean of 0, except it that doesn't since the integral doesn't converge). Rlendog (talk) 20:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, something should be added about finiteness. 68.9.178.110 (talk) 08:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cantor distribution is bounded, so it is easy to see it has a finite mean and central moments, and then apply symmetry. --2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:1D7E:1277:3AA3:5C97 (talk) 08:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Mean

message: This example i useless for even some of those who have a good degree of mathematical training.
I literally am only speaking for myself and that sentence is technically true.
A much better explanation is due, that actually goes through the deductive steps needed to get from whatever the first statement is to the next is needed. 
I understand a lot of probability theory and some measure theory. Admittedly I'm weak on my measure theory and that's relevant here, but nonetheless, I have enough background that I should be able to understand this article.
I'm going to try to learn more of these things, and if nothing else I'll try to circle back and fix this at some time in the future. The information available to complete this article more sufficiently I believe exists, and it's just a matter of finding it and organizing it in the correct way for me to be able to transmit it back here.
Mdpacer (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not easy to see by symmetry if you can't see what should be symmetric
Talk:Ecozoic

message: This whole page is a cut and paste from http://www.ctr4process.org/publications/SeminarPapers/26_1ECOZOIC%20IDEAS%20FOR%202002.pdf 
No copyright claimed on that page.Greedyhalibut (talk) 23:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut and Paste job
Talk:Motorcycle driveby

message: I created this page with the contents.. I'm a newbie so maybe someone can clean it up and put it to proper standards? Cheers. --Lieb39 03:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hood

message: People with the last name hood are Irish Scottish and English and more
*So I see. Would it be helpful to have a one-liner by each entry in this page? --Martinship 09:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Hood (rail transport), covering over a flat wagon or coil car Peter Horn User talk 21:33, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A rigid covering to protect a load. Peter Horn User talk 22:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but a DAB page must link to an existing (blue link) article that discusses the concept and when I reverted it was a red link.  ~ GB fan 22:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  An additional kind of hood 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :'hood and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 30#'hood until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 22:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "'hood" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Villains in Power Rangers: Wild Force

message: Looks like the articles Villains in Power Rangers: Wild Force and Org (Power Rangers: Wild Force) are duplicates of each other, and that they should be merged.  Having said that, not all PRWF villains were Orgs, but all Orgs were PRWF villains.  Separating them by "Org" and "Non-Org" is pretty redundant, since the only non-Org villains the whole season were in "Forever Red".  I'm up for any resolution, but I just don't like duplicate articles. kelvSYC (talk) 05:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger
Talk:Villains in Power Rangers in Space

message: The article for Ecliptor says, "He is a powerful general, capable of holding his own against even the Red Space Ranger, Andros." But does being able to fight Andros really show that he's powerful? Most of the monsters are powerful enough to defeat a ranger one-on-one. Ophois 22:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecliptor 

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Psycho Rangers into Villains in Power Rangers in Space; dated: May 2017. Proposer's Rationale: The Psycho Rangers article is all plot and unsourced trivial information and nothing proving notability has been added since its creations years ago. Whatever little information we need about them can be added to the villains article. -User:173.3.76.2. Discuss here. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion
Talk:Rita Repulsa

message: Wait, where did it ever say that Rita Repulsa and the Magic Mother were the same person? Sure, they're the same actress, but whether they're the same person or not is HIGHLY debatable. And if I remember correctly, when Rita Repulsa was turned good by Zordon's energy wave, she was turned into a human, not the ruler of a magical dimension that had apparently existed before the events of MMPR-PRIS. Sincerely, Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 22:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic Mother 

message: I'm almost sure it's Repulssa with two s's.
Almost sure, but completely wrong. :)  192.249.47.11 19:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling
Talk:Memnoch the Devil

message: I think Christians have fewer problems with the fictional cosmology of this book (Tolkien did fictional cosmology), than with the moral relativism and romantization of evil characters that seem to underpin the whole Rice vampire series. The article should cite a representative Christian source before portraying Christians as critical of this book in particular. (Of course, the choice of a "representative Christian source" is likely to generate controversy in itself, but if the editor of the article wants to keep in "Christians condemn 'Memnoch' as heretical", at least be specific about who says so so that readers can judge for themselves whether or not the opinion is representative of Christianity.) -- Meyer 03:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Regarding:
"It is later stated that during Lestat's coma, he is actually outside of his body. During which, he is forced into labor by angelic beings (stated in Blackwood Farm)."
Should this be included in the synopsis?  It doesn't have any extra value regarding the book - it has to do with Blackwood Farm and Lestat.  I think it should be removed.
:Agreed, unless some really good point of why we should keep this, I will remove it in few days.--Saleh 10:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lestat's Coma

message: I have added the date published next to the book title as it was missing
207.166.7.210 20:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  date
Talk:The Moustache (film)

message: Just watched the film, and saw this line in the article: "Marc arrives at an unspecified village within China. Marc stays at a hotel there for a period of time, becoming known with the locals, and regrows his signature moustache."
That is NOT how i saw (it's definently open to interpretation). As we cut from Marc in the village the first night to the next scene, where he has his moustache, I did not take that as a passage of time, but a shifting of reality. i.e. To him, no time passed (there wasn't a period of time, it was literally the next day), but reality had changed back to where he had never shaved. Thus, unless there's word from the director/producer/writer/etc. saying that there was a period of time (and there very well might be, and no, i don't mean from speculation by some of the production team but actual word on the intent), i'd love for this to be changed to something open to interpretation. (I know, I could edit it myself, but i was curious if there WAS word from the production team on this topic that anyone had heard of) --Quadraxis (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Period of Time
Talk:Ranger Smith

message: Borderline. I added some sources to the article about him becoming a park ranger stereotype. There is a bit more in this master thesis  which in turns also suggests there is some discussion of this character in Erickson, Hal. Television Cartoon Shows: An Illustrated Encyclopedia 1949-2003 (2Volumes). J. I can't get access to this work, snippet view only confirms that this character is mentioned on few pages, and has its own entry in the index: . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability