Talk:Loading gauge

message: :es:Gálibo ferroviario
[[File:Gálibos FFCC 01.png|thumb|450px|right|Gálibo ferroviario [1] Vehículo [2] Perfil constructivo máximo del material móvil [3] Suma de los desplazamientos del vehículo y de su interacción con la infraestructura [4] Contorno de referencia [5] Gálibo de implantación de obstáculos [6] Infraestructura[a] Gálibo de partes bajas [b] Gálibo de partes altas [c] Gálibo del pantógrafo]] 
Parked here pending translation from Spanish.]] Peter Horn User talk 21:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Added translation from  Google translate. 
Loading gauge [1] Vehicle [2] Maximum construction profile of rolling stock [3] Sum of the vehicle's displacements and its interaction with the infrastructure [4] Reference contour [5] Obstacle implantation gauge [6] Infrastructure  [a] Lower part gauge [b] Upper part gauge [c] Pantograph gauge]]
Peter Horn User talk 23:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parked here pending translation from Spanish 

message: I invite all who may be interested to weigh in at Talk:Boxcar#Personal web sites Peter Horn User talk 17:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  An invitation to comment 

message: According to this dead AAR Plate-D does not exist and the bottom of AAR Plate-E is  inches ATR. Peter Horn User talk 22:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See Loading gauge#Freight Peter Horn User talk 22:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Any one interested see also  and make a comment there. Peter Horn User talk 15:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A spurious AAR plate-D? 

message: Talk:Loading gauge/Archive 1#Loading gauges by country. 
. Hello, Why did you call the file loading gauge instead of structure gauge? What is it? I don't have my Jane's 1970 edition handy. Peter Horn User talk 04:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I'm patiently waiting for a clarification. Peter Horn User talk 13:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eritrean loading gauge 

message: Loading gauge#Irish Gauge Ireland has a maximum height of  and a maximum width of .  Peter Horn User talk 01:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are. Go to the actual file by pressing "2022 network statement", and in the 148-page pdf file there is a table of contents with loading gauge described in appendix 3 on page 67. Unfortunately scanned from paper with bad quality with is bad for an official regulatory document.--Libb (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Gauge 

message: Glasgow tunnel smaller than previously stated minimum diameter agreed upon, mistake in text or what's reason for not honoring it?
In the section "Tube lines", it says '"The evidence submitted to the Committee on the question of the diameter of the underground tubes containing the railways has been distinctly in favour of a minimum diameter of 11 ft 6 in (3.51 m)". After that, all tube lines were at least that size' but then the Glasgow Tunnel is listed in the following list with 3.35m diameter, which is less than the agreed upon 3.51m minimum. Is this a mistake or is it worded confusingly? 2003:E8:D70B:7799:75C3:78C2:F13F:D393 (talk) 16:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The question is, whether the Comittee's findings were binding or not. If so, did they apply only to standard-gauge railways, or to all railways? --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 20:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glasgow tunnel smaller than the minimum diameter agreed upon?