Talk:Jac Naylor

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
:*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Frickative (talk • contribs) 23:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just dumping some more sources here as I find them. Soaper1234 - talk 09:43, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sources

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jac Naylor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120830030843/http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/drama/holby-city/whos-who/jac-naylor/77 to http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/drama/holby-city/whos-who/jac-naylor/77
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: - Hello. I wanted to know your thoughts on the storyline section. I blame it for putting me off trying to improve this article. What are your thoughts on losing the section? Would you be interested in working together on the article?Rain the 1 21:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If the events in the section can be covered by sourced development info, then I reckon it could go. I'd definitely like to contribute something to its improvement too. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  If it can be covered by development then sure, get rid. I tried to tidy up and add bits to the development recently, so I'd definitely be up for helping with the article's recovery. Soaper1234 - talk 07:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That is great. If we choose different parts of her duration to cover then we could get some definite improvement. I have a good selection of mags from her first four years that could be useful. Maybe if you would like to pick sections about Johnny, Fletch, Matteo, Jasmine, Gaskell etc?Rain the 1 17:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Great plan. I've already started a section on Fletch, so I'd quite like to finish that. From there, I'm happy to help however - just let me know. Soaper1234 - talk 18:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That is great. I have managed to find a couple of good articles in old Inside Soaps so I will start adding info.Rain the 1 21:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Just an update that I have finished adding what I found in pre-2011 mags.Rain the 1 12:09, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's looking really good so far! I'll try and add more too. Soaper1234 - talk 19:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I'd like to take on the Jonny/Emma section and maybe Jasmine. I'll start gathering sources. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is looking better already.  I thought they would be a good choice for you since you created Jonny and Jasmine's articles.Rain the 1 06:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

text: I'm happy to scrap the storylines section since most of it was from early in the stint and that is (mostly) covered now. I do have plans to continue with this, but my other things are taking over at the moment! Soaper1234 - talk 16:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need to make a note of which storylines aren't covered by sourced content before removing them. I know I have to finish the Emma stuff, and add a section on Jasmine. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That is okay as we can wait. I did think it needed more information on Joseph but I couldn't find much content for it.Rain the 1 10:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There might be more when he returns later this year. - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You were correct - already more information in her latest Inside Soap interview.Rain the 1 20:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

text: I agree with the removal of the storyline section. There's more than enough sourced information now and more to be added, so the section is almost redundant. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also support the section being removed. Soaper1234 - talk 19:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, I am glad we finally got there. I have now removed them and it was a total length of 24,443! Woah..Rain the 1 18:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storyline section