Talk:Next (game show)

message: Needs to be distinguished from NextEd, the learning services provider.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.28.201 (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Disambiguation

message: "Next" is not a verb. One cannot "next" a person. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a MTV show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.2.255.236 (talk • contribs) 
One Can not "Buy a Vowel", Yet since it's the terminology the game show uses... 69.207.42.15 (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar stuff 

message: I personally think this show is fake and scripted. I feel sorry for the actors that make fools of themselves by being in this rediculous show. Mtv needs to stick with the music....and live th dating shows to some other network because room radors also sucks....—Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.240.63.230 (talk • contribs) 
I heard from my friend, that this show is completly written cause of one of the crew members from Date My Mom also works for this. This meaning that all her shows are written.
This is used as a doorway for aspiring actors.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.185.125.101 (talk • contribs) 
: there not all actors, people from the show did come to my college over a year again and I did try out. I did get a callback in december but I couldn't do the day my "date" was set up Sirevil 05:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCRIPTED 

message: Hey everyone, this whole article needs work. There's tons of original research, and that's against Wiki policies. The language in the main article is redundant (how many times do you need to explain the way the money accumulates) and has very little organizational structure. I'm removing the entire trivia section as it is because there isn't a single cited claim in there. If you want to revert it, go ahead but remember that Wikipedia is not a place for original research. If there's no citation backing up what you're saying, it's going to get deleted. It may be interesting that Pumkin was on this show and Flavor of Love (among many other shows actually) but it's not worthy of an encylcopedia. If you can cite a reliable source that talks about her appearance on both of these shows, we can discuss it. For now, just note that even her imdb entry doesn't include her involvements in Next, Blind Date, or any of the other shows she's been a contestant on. Mikeliveshere 06:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Serious Clean-up! 

message: Who the hell here deleted it? I was going to add that Darreyl from XPosed was on it.74.195.3.199 22:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRIVIA 

message: I don't think anyone has a problem believing that much of the show is phoney.  The problem is the lack of  WP:verifiable sources that state this.  Wikipedia is about verifiability.  It is not about what our friends and relatives tell us. Shaundakulbara 03:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop Trippin'

message: According to Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Television episodes it says:
Content about television episodes must conform to Wikipedia content policies, including but not limited to Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research.
Thanks.  Shaundakulbara 18:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Even though the show is over for Season 3, new episodes are being filmed to keep up with the commercial  for those that missed it. Next executives realised the show was being shown all day on 2/10/2007 and wanted to keep it fresh before production on S5 started and numerous breaks and/or pre-emptions. Season  5 will begin after production of both Dismissed Again and Exposed series 2 begins —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.195.9.240 (talk) 22:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Episodes 

message: I signed in but i can't make comments. When I want to edit th epage it opens a file which is fucked up. What do I do?Rocky 19:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: sIGNED IN

message: I believe the NextOrNot section should be included. It seems to be part of the show, and something that they're promoting. It was removed as vandalism, which I really don't think it is. Any reason why it should be removed? — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 13:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of NextOrNot 

message: :Image:Nextimg.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nextimg.JPG