lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Catapulta

message: A Pelta was a specific, leather-faced shield with crescent shape, famous throught eh peltasts. The general term for "shield" was "aspis". It would be quite unimpressive if the engine's projectile could merely penetrate a pelta, sicne such shields were weak compared to a bronze-faced Aspis of a classical Hoplite. Lastdingo (talk) 02:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "pelta"
Talk:Elizabeth Charlotte of the Palatinate, Electress of Brandenburg

message: name should be an S not Z. I will move it later Louis Philippe Charles (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Very strange title - I can't believe. --79.253.1.197 (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electress <u>of of</u> Brandenburg?
Talk:Teagan Clive

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 08:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Article is very stubby, but seems notable at face value: Appearance in several notable films, a published book, writer for a notable magazine: All of these at least assert notability.  I would not object if this were put to an AfD, but it appears that the article has too many assertions of notability to be a clear cut PROD. --Jayron32 19:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On the removal of the PROD
Talk:Baltimore Catechism

message: I was reading recently the wikipedia article about Félix Varela, and noticed a mention that he was a consultant for the committee of bishops during the writing of the Baltimore Catechism. I don't have much first-hand information, but I wonder if his contribution was significant enough, perhaps a mention could be made somewhere in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lwangaman (talk • contribs) 17:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribution by Félix Varela?
Talk:Chempil Arayan

message: None of the qualified historians (Prof. Elankom, Prof. Menon, to name a couple) have mentioned anything about any Chempil Arayan. Is there any proper historical evidence (apart from family lore) about the exploits of this individual?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.55.128 (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  historical proof 
Talk:Sândominic

message: What policy are we using on this page with regard to Hungarian name order? It's a bit of a mix right now, with "Áron Márton" but "Báthory András," etc, and we might end up confusing people who are either unfamiliar with the figures or who can't immediately tell given names from family names. I would suggest using Hungarian name order for all the ethnic-Hungarian figures, but I assume this decision has been made somewhere else already. Hubacelgrand 19:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dharmananda Damodar Kosambi

message: "However, after the birth of his first daughter, Manik, he did leave his family not returning for nearly four years. Needless to say, his wife, Balabai, suffered during these years, as it was uncommon at the time for a married man to leave his wife and family."
This claim needs to be backed up. In fact it is standard for the wife to go to live with her husband in his parents house. She probably lived with his parents and "needless to say" is quite the wrong - it does need to be said! Jayarava (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving the Family
Talk:Rani Durgavati

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: I would like to put down Abul Fazl's Akbar Namah (Vol II, Chapter LII) as a source for the Wikipedia entry. Most of the information corresponds to Abul Fazl's record of the times and considering he wrote from the perspective of the invaders, it makes the entry on Rani Durgavati very verifiable.
Hi mabdul, check this site which is amazing for Persian literature- http://persian.packhum.org/persian/main?url=pf%3Ffile%3D00702015%26ct%3D304%26rqs%3D181. If you go to persian.packhum.org/persian/ you might get access to translated Persian works. Scroll down to Abul Fazl by author, or The Akbarnama by title and you will get the document (in pdf format I think) The Durgavati entry is in Chapter 52, Vol 2.
I wud like to add it as a reference since the wikipedia entry says there are no sources and verifiable links- So I guess yu could put the reference down at the end of the entry.
Bkrish68 (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, where do you want to add this exactly (after which sentence)? I saw at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu'l-Fazl_ibn_Mubarak#cite_note-9 that this ref was used multiple times, but sadly this book is not scanned by Google books; do you have a year or a ISBN or similar things for it? mabdul 00:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 22 February 2012 
Talk:S3 ViRGE

message: 1600x1200 with 16.7M is unrealistic, might be mere 16 colors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.252.26.110 (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that would be nonsense as that would require at least almost 5.5 MiB (considering 24 bpp only, with padding to 32 bpp we get over 7 MiB) of video RAM which is above the maximum 4 MiB supported. And you are also mostly correct with the 16 color depth -- the datasheet lists 4 bpp non-interlaced, but 8 bpp is also supported with interlaced video. --JITR (talk) 02:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There, fixed. I also had to remove the accompanying 80 Hz refresh rate info, as this seems to be nonsense too. The 1280x1024 is supported at 75 Hz only so fat chance to have 1600x1200 at 80 Hz. Unfortunately I couldn't find the correct refresh rate in the datasheet, so this information had to be dropped without replacement. --JITR (talk) 03:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1600x1200 with 16.7M 

message: The article states that the card didn't support OpenGL, but lists in the specifications section that the card had driver support for that API. What is correct? 77.9.67.72 (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenGL?
Talk:Crisis at Central High

message: So far I haven't been able to come up with a reliable source via Google for this detail that I know to be fact (a family friend and her son had non-speaking parts in scenes filmed at Woodrow — if you watch the movie, look for the scene where a boy at the Halloween hop is dancing with the paper witch decoration hanging from the ceiling — it was an ad lib :). Lawikitejana 19:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone with a print source for filming at Woodrow Wilson HS? 
Talk:St Aloysius' College (Malta)

message: Vandalism is the main problem on this page. Responsible students/people need to defend it. This could be a good page. Needs refs for the alumni claims. Victuallers 09:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I have moved the article to its correct page name in conformance with both the  Wikipedia naming conventions for schools and the official name given on the school website. The school website also introduces a period (".") after the "St"; however, I believe this to be a typo since it goes against the British English convention on abbreviations. Ayla 14:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:The Peel Sessions (Joy Division)

message: These may as well all be collected on one page. Lachlan Foley (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[The Peel Sessions (1986 Joy Division EP)]] 

message: These may as well all be collected on one page. Lachlan Foley (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[The Peel Sessions (1987 Joy Division EP)]]
Talk:G. R. Gopinath

message: Please check the claim that he's Tamilian --Rrjanbiah (talk) 11:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamil or Kannada? 

message: The upcoming Tamil movie "Soorarai Pottri" starring Suriya is loosely based on the life story of G. R. Gopinath Narayananpns (talk) 13:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:Russ Gibb

message: ----
I know it's the wrong tag. I meant "in a wrong tone" --87.52.25.155 19:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I have no vendetta against DeCerchio, and I resent the accusation.  I don't see how mentioning DeCerchio, one of Russ Gibb's most successful students, and DeCerchio's accomplishments as a commercial director (IMDb lists him as creator of "Yes I Am") qualifies as a vendetta.68.41.109.188 06:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DeCerchio
Talk:1883 Rochester tornado

message: What is the source of the map? I believe the path is just north of downtown, not way up in northern Rochester. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.44.155.149 (talk) 03:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is where I found it:  http://www.crh.noaa.gov/arx/events/rst_tor1883.php Gopher backer 12:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taroudant

message: Lior shani 19:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 

message: The official name of the city (as seen everywhere in Morocco, and in the website of the city) is Taroudannt (with 2 'n'). Taroudant is just an old error in some English or French documents written in Europe and America... verdy_p (talk) 09:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please rename 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  02:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Per the same points made at Talk:Salé earlier, Medina of Taroudant is an unnecessary WP:SPLIT from this article. The article here is very short already and the other article is a stub whose content can be summarized in literally one sentence. Even if both were expanded significantly, there is no advantage in having them separate. This can be and should be covered here instead so readers can find information in one place. As the case of Marrakesh shows, there is no automatic need for a separate article for the medina even for a much more notable city. Given my previous experience with merges, I frankly can't imagine anyone opposing this, so I'm going to go ahead and make a WP:BOLD merge. If there are objections, we can revert and/or discuss here. R Prazeres (talk) 16:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Medina of Taroudant]]
Talk:George Reddy

message: I reverted again here for a variety of reasons, including WP:MOSFLAG. The main reason is simply because the claim that the removed information was unsourced appears not to be true. There is, for example, a citation to :The Hindu. - Sitush (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing and my recent revert 

message: There has been major politically biased edits in the article in last few hour. Pl do watch Ranjith Kannankattil (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major politically biased edits
Talk:Camp Crook, South Dakota

message: It says, "Major Carrol was dispatched with Troops B, D, and M of the U.S. 1st Cavalry Regiment to the Tongue River Agency, where they established Camp Crook." Is that this Camp Crook? There appears to have been one in Montana, and there is a Tongue River (Montana) also. A citation is needed. StAnselm (talk) 21:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tongue River Agency is in Montana (Custer County), so I don't think this is talking about the same place.Intothatdarkness (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Gopalkrishna Gandhi

message: Mr. GK Gandhi must enter into political space now to uphold the ideals of his grand father MK Gandhi and to save the country from hatred and divisiveness Chitrabanan (talk) 09:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian politics
Talk:Guipúzcoa

message: Hi there,
Guipúzcoa is not a province, neither are Álava or Biscay. The three are offcially called "historic territories", and calling them provinces is a mistake (a common one, though).
:In traditional Basque usage, Guipuscoa was the provincia: Check Philotea from 1821:
::Topatuco dute bear bada Provinciaco eusquerarequin batian Nafarroacoa, Vizcayacoa ta Arabacoa,
::"They will find maybe along the Basque language of the Province [i.e. Guipuscoa] that of Navarre, Biscay and Alava".
:However, as you say, the Ley de Territorios Históricos created this new category, for reasons unknown to me.
:--Error 01:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Province

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose We should use "Guipuzcoa", as discussed below. Jmgonzalez 10:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I have started a general naming debate on the naming conventions of Basque provinces at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basque and would like to invite all interested parties to take part in the debate. Akerbeltz (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming debate
Talk:Gopinath Muthukad

message: The nutral point of view of this article to be maintained to comply to an encyclopeadic content.
anybody out there to correct it? Anuandraj (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: This page still does not reflect a neutral point of view. It is written more like an advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhipan (talk • contribs) 06:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Grand Duke Kirill Vladimirovich of Russia

message: I am reverting the non-constructive edits to the ancestry template which have no rationale. When first implemented, and during cleanup of articles, names are linked in the simplest form which is generally that prescribed by WP:NC(NT). According to the convention, monarchs (kings and emperors) and their consorts are named in the form Name (Ordinal) of Place, junior members of royal families are named Title Name of Place and those with substantive titles or ruling titles less than king are named Name, Title of Place. This is a consistent treatment and is suitable given that is how the articles are actually named. Charles 03:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names in the ancestry template

message: Can anyone provide any evidence that Cyril was ever called "HIH The Grand Duke of Russia"?  If not, this page should not be located at Cyril Vladimirovich, Grand Duke of Russia.  I am going to move to Grand Duke Cyril Vladimirovich of Russia. john k (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Heads of families usually have title given after their names so as to differentiate from cadets. In the 1938 Almanach de Gotha for example he has his title after his name, indeed so does every head of a family. - dwc lr (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...stupid Almanach de Gotha, making us use such ugly styles.  I'll bend to it, though. john k (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Powel Crosley Jr.

message: "In 1939, when Crosley introduced to the world the first small car..."
I had to remove that.
"The world" has Austin 7s and Hanomag Kommissbrots and a lot of other small cars long before 1939.
In fact, the Austin 7 was manufactured under licence and sold in America by the American Austin Car Company, which reorganized to become American Bantam in 1935. Respectfully, SamBlob 03:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crosley introduced to the world the first small car?  O_o; 
Talk:Gurcharan Das

message: This apparent autobiographical promotion for an author still has material likely violations of WP policy.  See WP:BLP.  I have removed overlinking to years and places, blatantly self-authored items, and links to the subject's own web sites.  There was only one citation, which I removed:  it was to the subjects blog.  This article is devoid of sources, and still contains items that may not be published anywhere but the subject's websites.  It still needs cleanup. It still reads like it was written by him or his publicist. Oldtaxguy (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant violations of WP:BLP
Talk:Guru Jambheshwar

message: I think we're making significant progress on improving the quality of this article, or if you will, stub.  One question I have is how to characterize the Bishois -- and no insult intended here -- as a community, a caste, a sect, or group.  It would be easier to describe the Guru if it was clear who his followers were.  Also, I do not think the Google test works here.  Comments?   Bearian 14:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found a possible answer at Bishnoi -- they are listed as both a community and a caste.  Bearian 15:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: The links in the article are mostly not working. can somebody do something? burdak (talk) 06:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: 1. मुकाम
2. समराथल धोरा
3. पीपासर
4. जांगलु
5. लालासर
6.रोटू
7.जांम्बोलाव(जांंम्बा) 
8.लोदिपूर(उतरप्रदेश)Manish Suthar Changard (talk) 05:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  गुरु जम्भेश्वर के मुख्य तीर्थ स्थल 

message: Source for all my edits here is Jambhsaar{also called jambhsagar} one the many sacred texts of bishnoi community. 
Please talk to me before reverting any change i made here. I am a devout bishnoi and seeing wrong details here hurts me (ToT) . Hemantbishnoi (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: People are trying to vandalize the page please help . Hemantbishnoi (talk) 14:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Help Of an Administrator
Talk:Franco-Cantabrian region

message: Most population need not be where it is now found more archaeological remains. Logic says that the refuge population was in southern Galicia and Northern Portugal, regions of good climate and easy food resources, regions that have been until 2 centuries the most populous of Iberia by far.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.154.72.240 (talk) 23:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aquitani

message: The idea of Gauls to the south of the Garonne is highly contentious on present-day academic standards beyong traditional academia, who by the way has also given pearls like Charlemagne being beaten by the 'Moors' on the Pyrenees in 778 and raised it to academic value. Caesar clearly distinguishes the Aquitani from the Gauls in the Garonne river; Caro Baroja (Los vascones y sus vecinos), an expert on the Vascones and Basques throughout history also points to that distinction between proper Aquitani (Aquitania Tertia) and Gauls for military provisions, as requested by themselves (3-4th century). Archibald Lewis supports the Basques beyond the Garonne for the 8th century. It does not belong in the lede, I added it to a section. Iñaki LL (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Gaulish spoken north of Gascony"

message: Basic information to add to this article:  the etymology of the name "Aquitani." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Autrigones

message: There is a big contradiction in this article.
In the main text we can read that "They were originally a Central European Celtic people who originally settled the Garonne valley area in Gaul in the 5th Century BC, were they mingled with the Belgae. Around the beginning of the 4th Century BC they and some of their Belgae vassals migrated to the Iberian Peninsula. After crossing the Pyrenees,..." 
And in the image on the left we can read in the bootom label: 
 Location of the tribe of the Autrigones.
·Red: pre-Indoeuropean tribes
·Blue: Celtic tribes''
And the autrigones are marked RED?
And what's that stuff about pre-indoeuropeans tribes? Where did the author of this map gathered such information, because if he can prove this,
it will be one of the mayor discoveries in the ancient history of the Iberian peninsula. 
I have changed the map in the Spanish version by this one  http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:PrerromanosN.png 
Should I change it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiurdin (talk • contribs) 23:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hadi Rani

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition