lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:X v United Kingdom

message: First of all the case of X v United Kingdom is not application 7215/75 but 7525/76.
7215/75 deals with the mentally unstable and their treatment in "insane asylums".
Secondly the "case" (not a case but an application at the Commission) of X v United Kingdom was NOT decided as written here.
X' application (with number 7525/76 - http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/webservices/content/pdf/001-74410) was deemed acceptable.
Afterwards when the European Court had to decide the case was re-named to Dudgeon v United Kingdom.
(See this page - http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{"appno":["7525/76"]})
So I am not sure which case this page is talking about but NOTHING is correct on this page.
I recommend merging this page with the one on Dudgeon v the United Kingdom.
Greetz
Frank (PhD. researcher in Human Rights law @ Stockholm University)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.11.155.66 (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is VERY wrong
Talk:Plouhinec, Finistère

message: "Brittany has been inhabited by humans since the Lower Paleolithic. The first settlers were Neanderthals. This population was scarce and very similar to the other Neanderthals found in the whole western Europe. Their only original feature was a distinct culture, called "Colombanian".[10] One of the oldest hearths in the world has been found in Plouhinec, Finistère. It is 450,000 years old." See  Brittany
92.29.18.107 (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Neanderthal hearth
Talk:Île de Sein

message: According to someone on the French version's talk page, the exemption is on local taxes, not income taxes ; it dates from 1914 and is due to the harsh conditions of life on the island (at the time), but is apparently still current. No mention of any tax exemption following role in WW2 on the French Wikipedia. --Alþykkr (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tax exemption 

message: The disinfobox shows a wrong location in one of the two maps. Anyone interested in fixing this? The editable text is opaque to me.Wetman (talk) 23:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misplaced location in Brittany map
Talk:Elysium (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I've read some descriptions where in the D&D Elysium multicolors are the norm, constant varigated rainbows, dapple, mottled, streamers of rich and flashy color across every fiber of different terrain and texture of the land, sky & sea: across the whole plane everywhere & always. Didn't first edition call each plane a different sort of love? Young love, mature love, eternal love, etc.? The 'Empyrean' is the medieval concept of heavenly brightness I think here more suited than the simple fields of the Greek 'elysium', but that's my own take. The nature of its vibrancy reminds me of the description of the returned glory of Narnia in the final book after the battle in the chronicles; each realm after the next is more lively and colorful, and more real in its appearance than the last, richer and fuller. etc. 24.20.95.50 (talk) 13:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  colors more vibrant
Talk:Sacvan Bercovitch

message: Just curious:  this article is identical, text and notes, to the NationMaster entry.  The latter probably just rips off Wikipedia w/out attribution, but perhaps it would be good to ensure it's not the reverse. (JBeek)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.151.150 (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Which is the plagiarized version

message: This section is essentially undocumented. It makes sweeping generalizations and judgments, with just one reference to one page of a book. It is clearly lifted from something, but the source is anyone's guess. Without references, the section's exposition is unreliable. Hifrommike65 (talk) 19:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early work section
Talk:Christine Norden

message: The article claims that a feature of Venus is named after her, with a link through to a dubious source.
List of craters on Venus doesn't mention her. Nor List of montes on Venus. Nor List of geological features on Venus. Nor List of coronae on Venus.
A correspondent writes:
"I loved the idea of little-known 40s & 50s star Christine Norden having a feature of the planet Venus named after her, which numerous articles and web pages say is the case. I was baffled not to find it on any official list and emailed the US Astrogeology people to find out what the score was. My enquiry was forwarded to the 'Chair of the Venus Task Group' and I've had a reply...
“As far as I remember the name Norden was not assigned for any feature on Venus. Nevertheless I made a search on the web for "Christine Norden" and found numerous notes that some feature on Venus was named after her. These notes point "part", "peak", and "crater" as the possible types of the feature. But only "crater" is a possible category for naming after the names of the known women. I'm sure that this name was not assigned and I do not remember any discussing of this name or including it into the list of possible names anytime since 1985 when the naming of craters on Venus began on a broad scale. Currently all the craters on Venus 5 km in diameter and larger are named. So there is no room for adding more names of known women on Venus.”
So despite what was reported in the press at the time - she never had a Venusian commemoration and never will.
So, I think this claim should be removed, perhaps with a remark that though it is often claimed, there is no evidence that it is so.
Pemboid (talk) 12:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venus claim dubious 
Talk:Tony McGrane

message: I wonder if the comment about the current Member for Dubbo, Dawn Fardell MP:
::He was suceeded in Parliament by Dubbo councillor Dawn Fardell who has now since dramatically changed the style of of the Dubbo Independent MP's office from McGrane's "purest independent" to being heavily alligned to the Labor Party.
can be verified? Is there any objective evidence that Ms Fardell is in fact "heavily alligned to the Labor Party" [sic]? If there is would this not be better in an article about her? If there isn't I would propose that the comment be removed. Xdenizen 23:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dawn Fardell MP
Template talk:Country data United States

message: The 1795 flag variant should be changed from :File:Flag_of_the_United_States_(1795–1818).svg to :File:Flag_of_the_United_States_(1795-1818).svg. While the current variant is more famous due to its usage over Fort McHenry in the War of 1812, it was not the official flag of the United States, but rather simply a variant. Because of this, I feel it should be changed Gelid Lagopus (talk) 03:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . When the Fort McHenry flag is still wanted, editors can use e.g.   instead of  . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 11:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 21 April 2023 

message: You add missing armed force: 
| link alias-military = United States Armed Forces
VNW060222 (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 28 October 2023
Talk:Abiod Valley

message: This article is about a specific geological srea in this world. Why should this area be subjected to be deleted? I am assuming that is no one come up with a valid argument as to why this argument should be deleted in 24 hours then I shall remove the delete notice as I shall consider the issue resolved.
An issue is resolved as soon as everybody that has an argument puts there point forward and if I'm the only one to put my point forward then the issue is resolved. Jhfireboy I'm listening 23:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility of Deletion
Talk:Berry, France

message: I removed Alexandre Dumas from this page, as Alexandre Dumas, père was born in Villers-Cotterêts, Aisne and Alexandre Dumas, fils was born in Paris, Île-de-France (region).  I removed George Sand because she was also born in Paris.  Balzac was born in Tours. Ccady 23:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Authors not born in Berry
Talk:Valençay

message: the author is apparently not an English speaker.  If a link were provided to the original article surely someone could provide a readable translation - even for a 'low priority' article?
Antinomous (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Châteauroux

message: This article could use a major rewrite. It sounds as though it was created by running the French version of the page through Altavista's Babel Fish translation program. There are many sentence fragments and sentences which don't make sense. I'd give it a try myself if I were knowlegeable on the subject of the article.
Mr Instamatic (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup / Rewrite Needed 
Talk:Gray Waste

message: For gloom, insignificance, pusillanimous, hopelessness & worthlessness. Having three layers is quite the balance in universe as the most dark, dank, evil, pointless, bleak and dreary of places in existence and therefore the root of evil having no meaning or value whatsoever.... Is the first layer, being the initial have having no claim on being the deepest, the most worthless and true to form? Is the bottom, of course being the deepest and most extreme of the sentiment, the most? or is the middle, having no claim to either, the most overlooked and despair at being marginalized? All are equally useless, and all have some claim to being the most dark of the three glooms just based on their hierarchy and relative nature to one another. Fitting.. Very fitting. 4.242.174.226 (talk) 09:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 layers
Talk:Gehenna (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Rendall (talk) 01:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would personally prefer the page to not be deleted, which is why I redirected it in the first place. When the nominator sends it to AFD, hopefully you will have a good argument as to why it should not be deleted, Rendall? BOZ (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: BOZ Thanks. I do at least have a good argument about why it should not be deleted, but I won't know if it's a better argument than for it's being deleted until that argument is made! At the very least, the Outer Planes link to this page should be deleted, and relevant information written to that page. Rendall (talk) 01:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, don't say I didn't warn you. You'll see the AFD soon enough. BOZ (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ha! And see it I did. Seems some folk on a mission! A mission does not make them wrong, but I didn't see strong arguments against, yet. Fortunately, I'm pretty neutral aligned so to speak. If they have good arguments I'll agree to consensus. Rendall (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is what it is. BOZ (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored
Talk:Ingredients of cosmetics

message: No manufacturer has ever used carmine, or carminic acid in lipstick. It would be incredibly foolish to do so, since there exist legal, FDA-approved synthetic organic pigments that provide the same colors for 1/10th the cost. I'm getting rid of that sentence. I'm also going to bring this article back to a neutral POV.
I am not au fait with the way Wikipedia works, but may I suggest that someone removes the external link that claims to offer an understanding of how INCI works. The link is to a blog on which the owner basically claims that the longer the chemical name ,the more dangerous the chemical. This is, toxicologically, nonsense. There is no value in the informatoin contained on that link. 81.136.175.200 (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Discussion

message: Unusually for me I'm not going to place this on DYK.  There is simply too much missing for it to be linked from the Main Page.  violet/riga (t) 00:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not on DYK 

message: The general consensus seems to be that there are no demonstrable health effects of aluminium. There are a bunch of scary-sounding references in this section, but when I read them, they all seem to deal with theoretical risks rather than real ones. For example, aluminium damages DNA, but it apparently requires large doses. It seems unfeasible to try to get large doses of aluminium into your system by ingestion, because it is not well absorbed into the body. Then another quoted article examines transdermal uptake, noting that it leads to increased aluminium concentration in various mouse tissues. No indication of health effects, let alone human health effects. It seems that someone has been cherrypicking evidence to make aluminium look poisonous. Could we get an expert opinion on this subject? GilHamiltonTheArm (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deodorants section, dubious aluminium claim
Talk:Mount Celestia

message: Someone vandalized the whole thing with Pony references. Run a cleanup.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.247.147 (talk) 20:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I want a story where some mad power believes Tharizdun's prison is not strong enough, and so seeks to set him free only to shunt him into the 7th Heaven, the only place no one has returned from, believing it to be the only certain prison for him. The resulting risk unbalancing the planes in the process or destroying the multiverse has hosts of powers seeking to stop it. hah. 24.20.95.50 (talk) 12:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  7th Heaven as the perfect prison
Talk:Saul Raisin

message: The article references Spinal Column: The magazine of the Shepherd Center, Fall 2006, p12-13.  This states that part of Saul's brain was removed.  In Tour de Life by Saul Raisin with Dave Shield, it is stated that none of Saul's brain was removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.98.90 (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of brain?
Talk:Night Owl (album)

message: In the Official video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXW-sL5gzHQ&ab_channel=GerryRafferty it looks like Mo Foster playing bass.
Mo Foster's web site shows the same: http://www.mofoster.com/SessionsYouTubes/GerryRafferty.html
Is this Wiki's attribution of A5 to Gary Taylor correct?
Blether (talk) 06:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel - Bass player on 'Get it right'
Talk:Paris–Nice

message: I think this page should be moved to Paris–Nice (cycling) for greater clarity, and will do so if there's no objection. Miniapolis (talk) 03:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How will this improve the clarity? Were you expecting something else with the name "Paris-Nice" when you visited this article? If not, no disambiguation is needed.--EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 12:16, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, there was a car rally named "Critérium Paris-Nice" in the 1920s and 30s. I would add a Template:About, but there is no English article about the rally. Anyway, moving the article to Paris–Nice (cycling) seems completely unnecessary. Dr.robin (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Real Life (band)

message: Will start work on re-working the article and providing detailed references. Dan arndt (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: I've got hold of more covers/remixes than are listed, by notable artists too: Hypertraxx, Eurythmics, Pet Shop Boys, Culture Beat. Maybe someone wants to find out the respective release dates and add these to the section? 83.76.23.92 (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remixes/Covers 
Talk:Chuang Chia-jung

message: She is from Taiwan.
The only reason you want to put ROC instead of Taiwan, Nationalist, is: Taiwan is part of the ROC.
1st of all, I only need one reason to make it Taiwan (only):Taiwan is the common name for the ROC. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). Or you want to make it Taiwan, Taiwan maybe? 2nd, even if we aren't sure what is neutral, putting Taiwan will absolutely be neutral! Since her birthplace is located on the Island of Taiwan. DO NOT change it back until you've got more reasons, please.--Jerrypp772000 00:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1st of all, I had two reasons, if you read correctly. 2nd, this is an encyclopedia, it's about facts, not about constitutions. So it should still be Taiwan, not ROC, because of the Wikipedia naming conventions.--Jerrypp772000 00:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, the country's name is ROC/Taiwan like how Greece's name is Hellenic Republic/Greece.--Jerrypp772000 01:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: /means or, in case you didn't know. Again, this is an encyclopedia, not a constitution okay?--Jerrypp772000 01:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: What do you mean the ROC is not ROC? A play place? What are you talking about?--Jerrypp772000 21:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Please refer to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Political NPOV. It does ask for the country, therefore stating either Taiwan or Republic of China alone would cause possible POV violation since it would sound like Taiwan (or ROC, depending on the choice) is recognized as an independent nation from PRC. Since the independent articles of these two indicate that ROC is a country while Taiwan is merely an island, I suggest using ROC while indicating that it is Taiwan's current governmental administration. Also, it would be a different case if it were asking for birthplace, but it's not. And "residence" already satisfy that point. Vic226(chat) 03:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Nationalist: if you are saying that I agreed to leave it "ROC" instead of "ROC (Taiwan)" in my statement above, then you misunderstood me. I only point out lightly that the "country" asks for the country name (ROC), not the geography name (Taiwan). I then proposed "using ROC while indicating that it is Taiwan's current governmental administration" (above), which would be "ROC (Taiwan)", in order to avoid confusion of a general audience. In the end, Taiwan IS the more common name for ROC, even if it is not true in the way that they do not equal to each other. The knowledge of the general public should be balanced against your de-facto opinion on this issue. Vic226(chat) 05:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwan

message: As the results tables for this page are so lengthy, perhaps someone should consider splitting them out into another page entitled, Chuang Chia-jung career statistics? JoRoFo (talk) 01:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article?
Talk:Anvar Juraboev

message: This is my first article on Wikipedia. I will be contributing a lot about Uzbekistan.
I would be glad if someone contributed on the structure of the article, and I will be providing more information, while learning
more about how to use the Wikipedia to the fullest. KingFace 23:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Intermeshing-rotor helicopter

message: Someone moved the page back from rotors to rotor stating that the Manual of Style prefers the singular wherever possible. Would that it were possible for a singular rotor to intermesh with only itself. I'd be curious to see how it could be done. I believe the MoS does allow plurals where they are technically proper, such as in this case. --Born2flie 00:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving just to move

message: here's a rough translation with pictures; add info to present article:
Thanks.
KVDP (talk) 07:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I refactored the formatting so it wasn't disruptive to the Talk page. I don't think the article necessarily adds anything. At first glance, the German article doesn't meet the English WP:VERIFY and WP:CITE guidelines. --Born2flie (talk) 21:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it needs edited for English style and grammar. It looks like the results of feeding the German article through Babelfish. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 03:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation german page to be put into article
Talk:Harry Rimmer

message: Do anyone have any data about how the trial ended up going? Presumably if we can find a source for what happened, it would make sense to add it in. JoshuaZ 00:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a little digging. But I did not dig deep enough yet to know the details. My understanding is that he offered the 100 dollars to someone who could prove his challenge, so a prominent atheist answered teh challenge and Rimmer would not pay up. So it went to court. And his lawyer wrote a book. But I do not know who won or lost. It might be interesting to find te lawyer's book, or do more searching on the name of the trial: Floyd Rimmer? I would also look at all the Ronald L. Numbers articles I could find; there are several of them on the Web. I have some links if you cannot find them. There are a lot more than I have listed in this article.--Filll 00:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Floyd-Rimmer Trial

message: Might also be worthwhile to include, at the very least as a source, a biography written by his son, Charles Brandon Rimmer. -- Paul Rimmer
:If you're talking about In the Fullness of Time, it appears to be a novel based upon Harry Rimmer's life, not a true biography. The Antievolution Pamphlets of Harry Rimmer states that the "only complete scholarly biography" of him was "an unpublished doctoral dissertation by Roger Daniel Schultz". HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Sources
Talk:Abram Lincoln Harris

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 00:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps
Talk:Blackfoot Sue

message: Does anyone out there know anything about an album that Blackfoot recorded in the late 70s under the name Liner - both the band and the album. I think it was produced by Arif Mardin and contained cover versions of Stevie Wonder's hits. But I only know it by hearsay so cannot add anything to the article. Technopat 00:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since writing the above, I have come across the band's official website, and it makes no mention of the Stevie Wonder covers and at first glance, none of the tracks listed seem to be hits by him. Technopat 01:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackfoot Sue/Liner 

message: Am deleting the following paragraph, as well as the sub-section History, as it has been copied and pasted from the Blackfoot Sue website:
They suffered from comparisons with their contemporaries Slade, due to the stompy, percussive style of their singles, and found themselves uneasily poised between the singles and album markets (which, in the early seventies, were entirely separate entities - serious bands made albums, whereas lightweight pop acts made chart singles), carving out a successful niche in neither, despite firmly establishing themselves on the British touring circuit as a popular and dynamic live act.
Sorry, even though the content is very possibly correct, Wikipedia is quite clear on this issue. It might be useful to include more specific details as to their history, tours and recordings, and other line-ups. Technopat 01:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting history
Talk:Peter Rabbit

message: I have heard that there is, or has been, some copyright controversy regarding Peter Rabbit.  Perhaps this article should contain information about this.  Was this published in 1902, or just written in 1902?  It says they were owned by someone or other from 1943 to 2002 - so, are they public domain, now? Shoreu 05:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't that depend on where you are? Here in the UK, given that "Peter Rabbit" was certainly published in Potter's lifetime, the book's copyright expires at the end of 2013 (70 years after her death). I don't know about US copyright. 81.159.58.45 (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it would certainly depend on where you are. Shoreu (talk) 23:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Information 