lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Regions of Queensland

message: The article looks on the way to completion, great work putting this together in such a short time.--nixie 12:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great work

message: To my understanding, the "tropical north Queensland region" includes the whole area of the state above the tropic of capricorn, certainly, this is the area that is within the globally defined "topics". To say that this is another name for the far north region is misleading. see:  for a definition of "tropical". using this definition, the Tropical north queensland area covers almost half of the state from around Rockhampton north.Alpha k9 03:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tropical North Queensland

message: I would disagree that some of the items on the list are known as regions of Queensland. Every major city serves are a service centre for the area surrounding it, sometimes called a district, but that doesn't mean every city has it's own region. I have added a few fact templates and would like to see more refs for claims that Townsville, Toowoomba or the Gold Coast are recognised regions.
Something is up with the refs, possibly due to using multiple citation methods. I'm not sure how to fix it. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other definitions

message: User:Ben Ives created this userspace revision in 2007
User:OESR created this userspace revision in 2008.
It looks like much of the intent of these edits is still missing from the current article. John Vandenberg (chat) 04:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified copies in userspace 

message: This article states that Far North Queensland covers 54% of the area of Queensland. This is clearly incorrect. The area given is also much larger than that given in the linked article on Far North Queensland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2407:7000:9B7A:8721:559E:A311:4E10:6AD5 (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far North Queensland
Talk:Web-Based Enterprise Management

message: {{tmbox
| type  = notice
| image = 
| text  =  article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
{{#if:While there's no doubt that content in our article closely matches that found in pp 147 following of the book, the presence of the content in our article predates the book and shows signs of natural evolution. For example, the key features section was added here on 1 September 2007 by someone in Germany () and substantially modified here weeks later to bring it closer to that external publication. It's unlikely that the content would have been copied in changed form from the book and then changed back. Moreover, the content on Architecture - also in that book - was already present in the article when the features section was added and had been for some time. The sentence "To understand the WBEM architecture, consider the components which lie between the operator trying to manage a device (configure it, turn it off and on, collect alarms, etc.) and the actually hardware and software of the device:" was added to this article in 2005 by someone in Canada. It is far more likely that the content was copied from Wikipedia than the other way around. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

message: I'd like to see some information added on the history of WBEM.  How long has it been around?  Has it gone through any major changes?  What problem is it trying to solve?  How is it related to things like SNMP (if at all)?  168.251.194.18 (talk) 16:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: "WBEM schema" and "WS-Management" are no longer "under development". The version numbers might also be outdated, I did not check. --MathsPoetry (talk) 07:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "WBEM specifications" section outdated
Talk:Young Wizards

message: I removed the section on the book of night and moon, because it is a fairly small part of the series as a whole, and the section mainly serves as a summary of So You Want to Be a Wizard.
:Just for the record, it's The Book of Night with Moon.--Thnidu (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Book of Night and Moon

message: Unless I'm mistaken, wasn't the scene where Dairine's father said, "She's only eleven!" him reminiscing of when she first became a wizard and how much responsibility and danger was thrust on her at that age, rather than him stating her actual age at that moment in time? 
71.35.208.89 (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporal Setting

message: I moved Rolan to the main character because he plays a major part in two books and other character that share the same significance are placed in that location. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lord Airen (talk • contribs) 17:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rolan

message: The page says that the Pig
: has been called Chao, but it is unclear if that is a personal name or merely an epithet, as Chao is a Chinese word for pig.
Is that attested in the books? Google Translate gives 猪 zhū (Mandarin, simplified script), which is distinct from chao and zhao (described as "an alternative spelling of Chao"). My personal opinion is that it's just as likely to be an allusion to chaos and the Pig's somewhat Discordian-like tendency not to seem to take things seriously. --Thnidu (talk) 05:16, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chao (The Transcendent Pig) 

message: Does anyone else think it's a bit repetitive to have the character names as subsection headings, followed immediately by the same name in bold? Legowerewolf (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character names
Talk:List of fiddlers

message: Shouldn't this be called "List of Fiddlers"?
:Done. Just plain Bill 15:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: if no one objects, I'll split this into "Fiddlers (by region)" and "Fiddlers (alphabetical)" lists and update the template. new additions will have to be added to two artices, but template links seem a more appropriate place to chose which list you want
:After we all fall off the same cliff, will there be a way, right there where they will see it, to alert future stewards of the 'pedia to this need for double entry? This is the sound of me not objecting... Just plain Bill 02:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've asked the bot writers if they can help us out - I'll hold off on the split for a week or two to see if anyone takes an interest -- Eitch 17:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  split to multiple articles 

message: :*Jonathan Segel  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hernan43 (talk • contribs) 12:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative

message: *Aly Bain (Shetland)
*Duncan Chisholm
*Melinda Crawford
*Johnny Cunningham
*Andrew Dodds
*Colyn Fischer
*Alasdair Fraser
*Dougie MacLean
*Aidan O'Rourke
*Bonnie Rideout✔
*Eilidh Shaw  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monxton (talk • contribs) 22:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scottish

message: SherryLN (talk) has been adding Sierra Noble to this page. Quite possibly this fiddler is notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article, but it doesn't exist yet. I have asked the user to consider creating such a page before adding the link again, without response. It is possible that the user feels bitten and does not care to talk about it. I do not think this needs admin intervention just yet. Perhaps someone else would care to drop a friendly word on the user's talk page? Could use a little help here. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; the link is now blue. Thanks, to the one who brought the article into the main space. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent addition of red link 

message: I have made a sortable table of fiddlers for the top of the page.  Users can sort by name, nationality or main fiddling style.  This eliminates the need to make a section "Fiddlers by nationality"
The section "Fiddlers by style"  needs fixing up. Some of the American categories are dubious, but I don't know enough about this to make the changes.  —Anne Delong (talk) 05:03, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sortable table
Talk:Perranporth

message: The text in the lead describes Perranporth as a town, but the Short description states village.... The joy of all things (talk) 15:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or village?
Talk:Longships, Cornwall

message: During a recent discussion following which the Wolf Rock, Cornwall article was merged with the Wolf Rock Lighthouse article it was suggested that the same treatment should be given to this and the Longships Lighthouse article. I'm happy to do this but will give a little time in case anyone has any objections to this. If not, I will proceed without further formality. Chris55 (talk) 17:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a bit more content here, namely about the names of the individual rocks, I therefore suggest that they should remain separate. Wolf Rock on the other hand is just a single rock. Crouch, Swale (talk)  18:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging the article 
Talk:Campanula alpina

message: The textblock:
COMMON NAMES - Alpine Bell-flower
GENUS - Campanula
SPECIES - Campanula alpina
CLASS - Pentandria
ORDER - Monogynia
AUTHORITY - Jacquin
MODERN GENUS - Campanula
MODERN SPECIES - Campanula alpina
MODERN FAMILY - Campanulaceae
PLANT TYPE - perennial
COLOR - pale to deep blue
SEASON - In flower in April, continues to flower for some weeks
NATIVE - REGION - Alps
ZONE - 4
looks like it has been copy-pasted from some source, though i dont know which. TeunSpaans 15:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I got it from here - http://www.nal.usda.gov/curtis/alpinebf.shtml
(Publication Date 1806)Alcinoe
:Ok, US Government and 1806 makes it both copyright free. TeunSpaans 20:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It is not copyrighted
Talk:Plympton Park, South Australia

message: Whilst a significant number of properties were developed by the former South Australian Housing Trust (SAHT), at no time can it be claimed that the majority of properties were owned by the SAHT. The streets of Herbert, Arthur, Clement, Acacia, Browning, South Tce, Wattle, Stradbroke (to name a few) contained no SAHT properties at all. Browning ave (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Housing SA
Talk:Wacker process

message: May I suggest a few possible references.  The initial stoichiometric reaction was first reported by Phillips:
*F.C. Phillips, Am. Chem. J., 1894, 16, 255-277.
*F.C. Phillips, Z. Anorg. Chem., 1894, 6, 213-228.
The Wacker reaction was first reported by Smidt et al.:
*J. Smidt, W. Hafner, R. Jira, J. Sedlmeier, R. Sieber, R. Rüttinger, and H. Kojer, Angew. Chem., 1959, 71, 176-182.
*W. Hafner, R. Jira, J. Sedlmeier, and J. Smidt, Chem. Ber., 1962, 95, 1575-1581.
*J. Smidt, W. Hafner, R. Jira, R. Sieber, J. Sedlmeier, and A. Sabel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1962, 1, 80-88.
(Only the last article is in English).  Hope this is useful.  Joseph Wright
:really good article guys, great job :)
Spuddddddd 8Mar08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.60.90.97 (talk) 20:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

message: The catalytic cycle has a few errors in it, likely due to copy/paste errors. The pictured catalytic cycle is inconsistent with the text and with chemical literature.
Numerous palladium species should not be bearing a formal negative charge as the oxidation state of Pd does not change from the +2 oxidation state until the very end after reductive elimination. Some species are drawn as being in the +1 or +3 oxidation state. The palladium species in question are the two alkylpalladium complexes on the bottom, the palladium aqua olefin complex on the middle right, and the alkypalladium hydroxide complex on the middle left.
Additionally, many of the palladium species shift between being aqua and hydroxide complexes, which is also inconsistent with literature.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChugJugWithU (talk • contribs) 06:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  catalytic cycle is mad scuffed
Talk:Chambao

message: Here are two references to the work of Chambao:
*http://www.barcelona2004.org/eng/actualidad/especiales/chambao/portada.htm
*http://www.esflamenco.com/scripts/news/ennews.asp?frmIdPagina=445
I had a look at the policy for including musicians and bands and think that Chambao definitely qualify for inclusion on the following grounds:
*Has had a charted hit on any national music chart, in at least one large or medium-sized country
YES. In Spain.
*Signed to a Major Label.
YES. A very big one, Sony.
*Prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city
YES. Although 'flamenco-chill' is a very small and new genre, in fact the esflamenco.com reference cites them as the orignators of the genre.
*Has won or placed in a major music competition.
YES they won a major award in Spain, the Premio Ondas
*Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show.
YES. Chambao's music is used in at least one national advertising campaign in Spain, the Andalucian Tourist Board adverts currently running on Spanish TV (Jan 2006).
Of course it merits an article. If Serbian Turbo-Folk singers merit articles I dont see why a group like Chambao shouldnt. By the way the only CD which is worth buying is the second one "Endorfinas en la Mente" which is very good.--Burgas00 13:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Justifying Chambao as Important Enough to Merit a Wikipedia Article

message: Sure, an internationally known musical group deserves an entry, i would think, but this reads like a record company promotional piece. To be blunt about it, it's advertizing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.72.244.157 (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  notablity isn't an issue. 

message: I've tried to get it back to a sounder version, but not managed it. There's virtually nothing left when the promo's gone. I'm not too sure about the notability, especially as there are only external links and no actual references. Peridon (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The band might be notable but the references do not establish that so notability is an issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coaster92 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Clan Nisbet

message: Have made a start on this article, re-using some of my own text from other projects.
Mark Nesbitt 15:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the article to Clan Nesbitt, it makes sense if the clan is recognised as Nesbitt to house it under that name and redirect from Nisbet. I've added some wiki links and tidied up as well. (Nfras 11:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I realised it should probably move, but felt hesistant about changing the page name. Mark Nesbitt 11:45, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Knuth's Algorithm X

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 08:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support as per my comment-reply-comment below! --Lox (t,c) 10:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: The exact cover, Algorithm X and Dancing Links articles all discuss similar ideas. The exact cover problem is an NP-complete problem; Algorithm X is a  brute-force algorithm that finds all solutions to the exact cover problem; and Dancing Links is a computer implementation of Algorithm X. These related topics have received a lot of interest recently because Dancing Links is the preferred technique for solving Sudoku puzzles quickly by computer. I suggest that all three topics be reoganized so that most of the information about concepts and examples is in the exact cover articles, with the other two articles focusing just on the particulars of the algorithm or the computer implementation. --Rob Zako 16:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganize Exact cover, Algorithm X and Dancing Links articles? 

message: Knuth uses "Algorithm X" as a temporary name for algorithms during discussion, not as actual referrable names, much as if you may say "imagine a variable x which represents the (unknown) number of articles in Wikipedia".  For example, there's another "Knuth's Algorithm X" in The Art of Computer Science, third edition, page 325.
I propose that this article be renamed "Brute Force Exact Cover Algorithm" or better, just combine it with the DLX article.
:Somewhat agree. Knuth says, "Let's call it Algorithm X for lack of a better name", which definitely implies to me that he wasn't trying to actually name it. On the other hand, Algorithm X is a generally useful concept, separate from its implementation DLX. If this is to be merged, it should be merged with Exact Cover. As Knuth puts it, "Solving the exact cover problem: [...] Algorithm X is simply a statement of the obvious trial-and-error approach. (Indeed, I can’t think of any other reasonable way to do the job, in general.)" Ben (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithm X is the wrong name 

message: This article directly quotes Knuth's paper without attribution and has apparently done so since 2006.    The text ought to be rewritten to avoid copyright problems. Michael Slone (talk) 03:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotation without attribution

message: Would be interesting to see an additional section here indicating the significance of this algorithm (I can't add it as I don't know what the significance is). I assume it has a 'real world' application?
--Mortice (talk) 23:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...but why?
Talk:Canon EOS 5

message: What is up with the article randomly changing tenses? It starts off saying it is a camera, then it was a camera, then it randomly changes a couple of times.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.199.76 (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because several different people wrote different sections and didn't match styles.  Feel free to fix it.  We generally write in the present tense about things that still exist, except when talking about their history. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 04:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense 

message: Given the only way this camera differs from the EOS 5 is the label, perhaps they can be merged?  The EOS 5 article has something that would make a nice intro, and the tech specs could be put into table format on the right of the page.  Bb3cxv 15:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: The A2/A2e lacks the -2/+2 digital scale to show under or over exposure featured in the EOS 5, which is reason enough to prefer the later, but I think the articles should be merged anyway. Maprieto 16:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just the label 

message: Merged the two articles. Maprieto 17:00, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved it back to EOS 5, the rational being that nobody is going to 5/2A/2Ae. hbdragon88 (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Done it 

message: I don't agree that prose is the only Wiki style, in fact I think it is the alternative.  My wiki style (which makes some readers hot) is to create a title, a descriptor, a paragraph, and then bullets that link to further reading often as citations.
Material and then be lifted safely into other documents that themselves may be purely prose, making them well-structured having been constructed here.  This protects open licensing.  In fact, it better defines the universal community of knowledge, and hence strengthens the public domain, the best model for this wiki in my opinion.--John Bessa (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Features bullets
Talk:Edwardstown, South Australia

message: I have added Google Map of Edwardstown and Castle Plaza Shopping Centre.  Kathleen.wright5 01:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added External Links 

message: I have added Political Details to this article.  Kathleen.wright5 16:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO it's better to only name the electorate and not the local members, otherwise after every election we have to go and edit the WP page of every suburb in every electorate with a new member. So I've changed it, using the format used in the Sturt, South Australia article. Peter Ballard 02:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Political Details
Talk:Children of the Mind

message: The lengthy "backstory" section should probably be incorporated into the description of the other books in the series, or removed, shouldn't it?--Inonit 15:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should. Gflores Talk 21:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree. (RCX 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where exactly should it go? LMK and I'll try to work on it. --ShadowPuppet 20:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well. It's basically another summary of Xenocide. All the information here in backstory is in Xenocide's Storyline section, so it's unnecessary to even keep it. CotM's own storyline should be fleshed out more, though I'm not the person to do that as it's been 6 years since I read it. FallenAngelEyes 03:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, the term "formics" and "buggers" has been used interchangebly in the books. I'm not sure it really matters --Cadet hastings 13:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ron Jacks

message: I'm the webmaster and author of the text that is the source of the copy right conflict.  I've reworked it on the wiki to be substantually different.  
Go to the source site and contact me through webmaster or via webmaster@pacificcoastswimming.com
Thank you -—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcrawford (talk • contribs) 
:Please include this as an html comment in the article to ensure people know in the future.-localzuk 16:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This was tagged as a copyright violation from . Although there is no copyright notice on the site, in the HTML source of the page, one can find the following HTML:
<link rel="copyright" href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html" />
As the content is licensed under the GFDL, there is no copyright violation. howcheng  {chat} 23:26, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio tagging
Talk:Kalidasa

message: The content of original Kalidasa has been moved here for accuracy and compliance of IAST. Find the older discussions at Talk:Kalidasa. --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">ΜιĿ</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">talk</FONT> 16:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, it would be appreciable if you get a username and sign your comments. Regarding the movement, there already is a history of double redirects. And then, you may not use IAST code while searching for an article, would you? --<FONT style="color:#5A3696">ΜιĿ</FONT>ː<FONT style="color:#008000">talk</FONT> 16:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Older discussions at [[Kalidasa]]

message: KD Sethna's Problems of Ancient India may be popular in some revisionist circles, but it has zero credibility in academic literature.  It's a pity that his chapter on Kalidasa was used to source material for this article.  We definitely need better sourcing. rudra (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fringe Literature 

message: This section really looks like a WP:COATRACK.  Maybe it should be a separate article. rudra (talk) 10:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalidasa in modern popular culture 

message: How could one call Kalidasa who lived centuries before Shakespear was even born be called him as Shakespear of India?? it is idiotic to compare two poets of different eras and different languages, culture and religion. 49.249.251.150 (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalidasa called as Shakespear of India.