lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Night Music (Joe Jackson album)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 02:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Richard Mulligan

message: In the book Film Facts (New York: Billboard Books, 2001), author Patrick Robertson calls Richard Mulligan "mentally handicapped [p.102]," which I have not seen anywhere else.  Does anyone know what kind of "handicap" Mulligan had, if any?  I thought he was brilliantly funny.
205.166.161.61 (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He was the lead and won an Emmy for the Golden Girls spinoff Empty Nest. This is mentioned under "Recognition," but shouldn't it be discusesed as part of his career?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8806:2400:415:3449:5216:77EB:E931 (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empty Nest 

message: Hi
  I found this line in the death section odd "Mulligan was also survived by special friends and Empty Nest costars Dinah Manoff and Kristy McNichol and David Leisure and Park Overall."
  Do we know they were special friends? What qualified them as special friends. No notation or source quoted. Did he not have special friends from SOAP? Should his friends even be listed? 2603:7000:BE00:4B:69C8:16E4:E45B:EF63 (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd Line
Talk:Richard Taylor (philosopher)

message: Richard Taylor's "Virtue Ethics" is hailed as one of the finest expositions of Aristotelian ethics in western history. 
Moreso, by virtue of his atheistic perspective and consequent Earth ground of law, aesthetics, individuality, and all things sacrosanct to Aristotelian philosophy.
i am, suprised, to say the least, not to find this work cited here.
 
but then again, i am also, not surprised, considering the recalcitrant and imbicilic exodus from intellectualism the world stage has imposed upon scholarship and academia of all kinds not suitable for manufacturing guns and military hardware. Necrodharma (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  virtue ethics
Talk:Stubbins

message: The 3 paragraphs added by Madeley266 require sources, correct formatting and correct spelling/grammar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricmitch (talk • contribs) 22:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The text says "Rossendale and Darwen" but the infobox says "Bury North". Which is correct? -- Dr Greg  talk  16:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constituency
Talk:Riley Dobi Noel

message: This is an article about a convicted child killer that was executed. Since 2006 it has occupied a place on Wikipedia while having no encyclopedic value. Gruesome murders are horrible, and killing children especially heinous. This does not mean a perpetrator should be immortalized with an article that has no references. The execution was listed as:
*44th murderer executed in U.S. in 2003
*864th murderer executed in U.S. since 1976
*1st murderer executed in Arkansas in 2003
*25th murderer executed in Arkansas since 1976
:There is nothing "worthy of note" about the above allowing inclusion on Wikipedia. Otr500 (talk) 10:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues including notability 

message: I have seen the last meal listed in many "execution" articles and would like to know the encyclopedic value of:
*"His Final meal was Fried chicken, mashed potatoes with gravy, hot rolls, a green garden salad with ranch dressing, Kool-Aid and cookies.". Otr500 (talk) 10:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Last meal
Talk:Rita Hunter

message: Someone wrote some corrections to what appear to be factual mistakes in this entry (e.g., Giulini never conducted at the Met, or comparing Hunter to another singer doesn't make any sense), but the original (probably erroneous) text remains there. It is kind of funny to read this entry as it is, it seems like it was written by someone with multiple personalities. Could someone with accurate sources please edit the entry and remove whatever is causing the contradictions? Thanks! 130.132.117.207 (talk) 23:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Abel (animator)

message: The URL for "Commercials: How They Changed Film Production Forever" is no longer valid. A video about the making of "Brilliance" is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eedXpclrKCc and the entire "Brilliance" video is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwK9BeWxPwQ. 2601:140:9500:1490:494E:EC3A:1C00:1D4B (talk) 11:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brilliance
Talk:Robert Addie

message: "Sir Guy of Gisbourne in the 1984–1986 English television series Robin of Sherwood (although still being only in his mid-20s and physically somewhat young-looking for the part of a veteran, ennobled medieval knight" - a very fringe opinion which shouldn't be in the main article. The character was a former "boy soldier", knights were ennobled at age 21 and it was Sir Guy's first job to be the "gamekeeper" for Abbot Hugo, he then became the Sheriff of Nottingham's right-hand man during the first series.  In the third series his old leader the Earl of Gloucester reminisces with him being the worst page to "drop a cup of wine" ten years earlier so he's clearly in his early days as a knight. Addie was 23, playing someone of about the same age.  And it's "Gisburne" not "Gisbourne".  2.28.151.187 (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too young? 

message: "...best known for playing Sir Guy of Gisbourne in the television series Robin of Sherwood."
Really? How do we know that? I would have thought perhaps he was best known for playing Mordred in Boorman's Excalibur. (If nothing else, I'll bet it's what he will be best remembered for, once the series fades into [well-deserved] obscurity; Excalibur won't.) --CRConrad (talk) 09:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best known? 

message: This is how we know it: While the beautiful film Excalibur will almost certainly have the wider international reputation, Addie only actually has about five minutes screen time in it. Conversely, he was a major and endearingly amusing and thus highly memorable and much higher profile character in Robin of Sherwood, a weekly show of two or three season's duration. Moreover, RoS was hugely popular in England, indeed, not knowing the actor's name, I searched for him this morning as Guy of Gisburne, not as Mordred. RoS was a greatly respected teledrama, much more so than later TV or film iterations of the Robin Hood tale (everybody I know thought the Kevin Costner version and everything after it was tripe, including Ridley Scott's mediocre effort). The reality is, the same Englishmen who loved Excalibur also loved Robin of Sherwood and still do, and it is unquestionably what Addie is famous for above all his other work. Likeamanshand (talk) 07:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Robin of Sherwood is getting regular reruns on British TV. I don't think I've seen Excalibur on it for years. History has judged! 2.28.151.187 (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? How do we know that?
Talk:Seventh-day Adventist Church in Laos

message: This is strange: the article has the disputed tag, but there is no explanation of what is disputed, nor was there even a talk page before I made this comment.  How can something be disputed without a dispute?  If you are the person who disagrees with what this page says, please explain the problem you have with it.  Thank you.  --Cromwellt|talk 22:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The French language article for Seventh-day Adventist Church is Adventisme, which says the full name is "L'Église adventiste du septième jour", which is remarkably similar to the title of this article. A name change would probably be warranted. The organisational directory has it as the "Laos Attached Field", under the Southeast Asia Union Mission. Colin MacLaurin 08:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Robert Brown (British actor)

message: Is this the same Robert Brown, actor, who guest-starred in the original "Star Trek" episode "What of Lazarus?"?  and is it the same actor who starred in the short-runned ABC-TV series 'Here comes the Brides, along a then-unknown David Soul and Mark Lenard?  69.126.238.184 (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What of Robert Brown? And What of Robert...?
Talk:Rob Buck

message: Robert Buck (musician) → Rob Buck — Known professionally as Rob Buck. Part of a disambiguation of three people. —Jokestress 02:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I believe Rob Buck is related to Peter Buck of r.e.m.  I think this because I was listening to 10,000 maniacs and I recognized a similar musical style to Peter Buck and sure enough the dude was named Rob Buck.  I can't find any documentation to support this, I hope others know more about his than me.  If this is the case, I think it should be mentioned in his biography.
: There's no familial relationship there. Read any of the stories from the time of his death, and none of them mention Peter Buck.Jstohler (talk) 21:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rob Buck is related to Peter Buck
Talk:Robert Burchfield

message: It would be good to get this page expanded. Leng T'che (talk) 23:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, to some extent Johnbod (talk) 15:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here's the full text of the author blurb on the inside back cover of the 2000 edition of Fowler's:
There're probably a few details from that missing from the article.  Here's a citation to use: — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official mini-bio
Talk:James Henderson-Stewart

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks OK to move, but should the destination be James Henderson-Stewart or James Henderson Stewart, his name before he took the baronetcy? Choess 17:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Space-based economy

message: Yes, I know it's mess. I'll try to come back and clean it up soon. Noclevername 22:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't come back... Viriditas (talk) 01:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This would be a good place to start a discussion about repairing and using the hundreds of Centaur Rockets that are in disposal orbits just beyond Geosynchronous Orbit. They all have simlar H2 - LOX engines which could be used for spare parts to repair the better ones, and LOX from the moon and H2 from earth will be available about the same time a repair factory could be put in place. The result is free rocket engines already in space. 198.203.213.110 (talk) 23:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Recycling Centaur Rockets

message: The article says "not to be confused with" (which is meanwhile automatically synchronized with wikidata and others, but unprecise).
"economic activity in outer space, including asteroid mining, space manufacturing" should fall within the definition of "industry" as of https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/industry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.92.66 (talk) 02:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differentiation to "Space industry" ?
Talk:Robert Hanbury Brown

message: I always understood he was known by his middle name Hanbury, just as Edward Gough Whitlam is always called Gough except in the most formal of contexts.  That alone suggests we should move this to Hanbury Brown.
In Early Years, we're told "Robert" was born in India.  Some time during Career he becomes Hanbury Brown.  After that it's our good friend "Hanbury".   (We should never write articles as if the subject is/was our personal friend on a first-name basis, even if he is/was. )  
In Publications, the first mentioned book is attributed to "Hanbury Brown and Twiss".  That suggests that Hanbury Brown was an unhyphenated double-barrelled surname.  Yet elsewhere he's referred to as just Brown, which matches the first-name appellation Hanbury.  The defaultsort is set to "Brown, Robert Hanbury".
On the other hand, there's the Hanbury Brown and Twiss effect, shortened to HBT, in which article he is always referred to as Hanbury Brown, never just Brown; whereas Twiss is just Twiss.  That adds weight to the double barrelled surname theory.
In summary, it's very unclear just exactly what his surname was.  Can anyone in the know shed any light on this?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: His name

message: "Sir Robert Watson-Watt attributes the invention of the word 'Boffin' to [G P] Chamberlain and suggests I was the prototype. I don't remember if that is true, but I would like to think so."
R Hanbury Brown : Boffin - A personal story ISBN 0-7503-0130-9 Adam Hilger 1991, p57  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roland Pease (talk • contribs) 12:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Boffin
Talk:Melissa Murphy Weber

message: Much of the material in this article is a copyright violation from http://www.elliottgreenleaf.com/mmw.htm AxelBoldt 22:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems that way.  In any case, I have removed some of the unsourced POV statements and added a notability tag.  I know her and like her, but have a hard time definding the notability of a person who has served a single term in the state legislature and has gone into private practice.  Yes there was some press about the county commish thing, but that was really driven by Bruce, not MMW.  In addition, she never even got to the ballot having withdrawn.  Montco 04:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For me, all members or former members of the Pennsylvania legislature are notable, and should be included in Wikipedia. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:Robert Heaton

message: The "Tributes on the New Model Army website" link seems broken as at 20 Nov 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.7.44.241 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

message: and is the subject 'Green and Grey' - Sullivan's eulogy to their creative partnership.  
Nope. Green and Grey was written many years before Robert left the band, so it can't be. Luckily this seems to have been removed. Most of this article is pretty poorly written and low on accuracy. Robert was New Model Army's 4th drummer, not second. There was Tom Tom, then another guy whose name I forget, then Rob Waddington and then Robert. Robert almost never contributed lyrics for the band as Justin wouldn't sing other people's lyrics so to suggest he wrote most of the music and lyrics for Thunder and Consolation is ridiculous. He didn't co-write all of the songs listed, and where he did, he wasn't always the only co-writer. I was also credited for writing Brave New World (with Joolz Denby), 51st State (with Ashley Cartwright), and White Coats, among other songs from that time. he was prolific, but he wasn't the main writer and architect of Thunder and Consolation. He was my best friend, I was best man at his wedding, and I find this whole article just a little unsettling in its use of 'alternative facts'.--00:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar? Meaning?
Talk:Yaoi fandom

message: but as fujoshi is better known, it is often used to refer to female otaku as a group.
↑that makes no sense, since when was it used to refer female otaku as a whole?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.197.135 (talk) 00:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have noticed that this article is VERY poorly organised. The 'opening' could probably be split further, which would make it easier to read. ~Sana (talk) 10:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reorganisation's very good - part of the problem with the initial versions of the article after the merge from yaoi was that I'd crammed everything 'fandom' into one section, when it's more complex than that. --Malkinann (talk) 22:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation 

message: I would like to ask others if they think this section either be rewritten or removed altogether. It is very difficult to make sense of, especially the Pandajoshi part. I would like to fix the grammar but I'm not even really clear on the intended meaning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LA2858 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of Fujoshi 

message: I feel like it should be updated, it is more then 10 years old. But I'm interested in hearing another's opinion before doing so.  Natasha862 (talk) 05:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Age isn't a reason to change it, but if you find an image you can use which illustrates the subject matter better, go ahead. --Pokelova (talk) 05:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image
Talk:Anticipatory grief

message: Shall we merge this with grief then? Richard001 22:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. It is a separate phenomenon. There is a lot of information out there on it. It is much discussed. Relatives of loved ones with long term illnesses such as Alzheimer's have to deal with this. I think it should stand as a separate article, to highlight it as an often overlooked set of emotions that one has to deal with. It would be good if the main article on grief said more about this. I should try to expand this subject in both articles. I just think that it would tend to be subsumed in the much more well understood subject of the grief that follows actual death. So, I don't think that merging is called for. Bus stop 22:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm usually more for starting small articles as subsections within a larger topic and seeing how they evolve from there. We'll see what others think about it, hopefully a few people will see the notice on the grief article and make a comment. For now I'll try to tidy it up a bit. Richard001 08:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I still feel it's better to leave it in the grief article until it's ready to break out into it's own article. I don't think it does Wikipedia any good to have tiny one or two line articles when there is a single broader topic they can be merged into. There's no doubt this topic deserves it's own article but I don't feel it does the subject any justice as is, so unless someone plans to expand it a good deal I think it would be better just to redirect to grief and let it grow there as a subsection. Richard001 10:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, that's three to one, so I'll take the merge template down I guess. Richard001 04:47, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: — Assignment last updated by Ajohn319 (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Social Attraction and Relationship Development
Talk:Lipstatin

message: I believe the structure needs complete stereochemistry. See http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.7981411.html--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the chemical structure image to fix the double bond geometry and to add full stereochemistry.  I have also updated the IUPAC name.  Please check that everything looks correct and consistent to you now.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:25, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   Thanks a lot for updating - the name is okay now, and the structure in the biosynthesis pathway is correct in showing "Z" double bonds, but I still see "(E)" or trans double bonds in the chemical structure in the box at the upper right of the page in the chembox. In the chembox it also doesn't show the (2S,3S)-stereochemistry in the oxetane ring. Krakatit (talk) 15:24, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The file has been changed and the old version no longer appears for me.  I think maybe your browser is showing you a cached version of the page.  Try quiting the browser and reopening, or holding shift while clicking on the reload button, or othewise clearing your browser's cache.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical structure
Talk:Robert J. Huber

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 01:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Pontiac Banshee

message: Search this page for "Matthew Verbin" and search the whole of Wikipedia and Google for the same name. He has posted on many wikis a bunch of nonsense, none of which, I suspect, is true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.186.227.222 (talk) 21:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Layton (politician)

message: ==Untitled==
I have added Robert Layton to this category due to a discussion about his son, Jack Layton. This is to serve as the references if anyone comes looking. Link  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilson(cc) (talk • contribs) 15:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: Canadian Monarchists 

message: I have added Robert Layton to this category due to a discussion about his son, Jack Layton. This is to serve as the references if anyone comes looking. Link  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilson(cc) (talk • contribs) 15:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Stevenson (filmmaker)

message: About the marriage to Goldwyn's widow: No mention of this in Berg.--Jrm2007 (talk) 22:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Italian WP has him dying on 4 November 1986, and German WP refers to sources that say either 4 September or 4 November.  How did these dates get into the record?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 10:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to have corrected their articles now.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 12:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death