Talk:Gwangju

message: I can't believe the lies that 24.180.28.245 is posting in relation to the Gwangju Uprising.  There was no communist involvement.  It was a legitimate uprising against brutalities committed by the Korean government against their own people.  I actually LIVED IN GWANGJU in May of 1980.  Granted, I was a bit young at the time, but I and my family are not "communist sympathisers"  My father and mother were Baptist missionaries to South Korea at the time.  It is an absolute insult to the brave people of Gwangju to imply communist involvement in the Uprising.  Even the current South Korean government has stated that the 5.18 was a result of military atrocities.  The only real debate about the Gwangju Uprising is related to the number of people who died.  THERE IS NO DEBATE ABOUT COMMUNIST INVOLVEMENT.  THERE WAS NONE.  24.180.28.245 should be blocked from any further edits.  I will be reporting his IP to wikipedia in connection with this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinfonian94 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  24.180.28.245 stop lying 

message: You guys need to stop this shameful editorializing and fix this city page.
The current History section content blatantly violates the NPOV requirement.  Even the parts of this content which are appropriate for Wikipedia belong on the Gwangju Massacre page, certainly not the Gwangju city page.  Do you guys know nothing about Wikipedia's standards, or do you just not care?
Suggest finding an appropriate revert for the History section, leaving BRIEF objective mention of the events and their importance, with the link to the separate page for these events.
J. Goard (talk) 08:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV discussion

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Before anyone considers moving this page again, please review WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The question is not whether there is more than one place called "Qwangju" (which is certainly the case), but which one are readers of the encyclopedia most likely to be looking for?  --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: Since the main article cannot be edited by me, I ask that whoever can edit it to please add Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) to the education section of the article.  GIST is located on the north side of Gwangju and is a significant contribution to technology institutes in Korea and around the world.  The mission GIST is to produce highly competent scholars and reserchers in science and technology, and to improve ongoing project and development capabilities in advanced science and technology.  More information can be found at the institute's website: http://ewww.gist.ac.kr  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.58.145.70 (talk) 09:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) 

message: Without quotation, "Most of commentators"  means: a large majority among nobody.
Without quotation, "Some commentators" means: a small minority among nobody.
After some thought, both are equivalent void assertions. Pldx1 (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some/Most of 

message: The following tag  was added by 58.29.64.10. But if one open the talk page, there is no discussion at all !  
The whole story appears as a (poor) joke. Removing. Pldx1 (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  npov hat 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Gwangju. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6H7Jql2A9?url=http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/global-metro-monitor-3 to http://www.brookings.edu/research/interactives/global-metro-monitor-3
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904074206/http://www.sisapress.com/news/photo/200610/41926_37953_1632.jpg to http://www.sisapress.com/news/photo/200610/41926_37953_1632.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110829235704/http://english.kofice.or.kr/d40_asia/d40_asia_02_2006y.asp to http://english.kofice.or.kr/d40_asia/d40_asia_02_2006y.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140704000717/http://eng.gwangju.go.kr/contents.do?S=S02&M=040311000000 to http://eng.gwangju.go.kr/contents.do?S=S02&M=040311000000
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified