Talk:The Book of Daniel (TV series)

message: :Image:BookOfDaniel2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BookOfDaniel2006.jpg

message: :Image:Daniel01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Daniel01.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on The Book of Daniel (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060220142411/http://www.mercurynews.com:80/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/13702858.htm to http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/13702858.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There's a big section here about the show being the subject of controversy and viewer complaints, but as a person casually reading, it's impossible to discern what it was that people were complaining about. I can make a guess that maybe it was the gay character, or an on-screen jesus questioning modern bible interpretations, but these are only guesses, because the article does not clarify this at all. I have never seen the show and only stumbled upon this article because I saw Zoom and was curious to see more things with Alison Pill in them, but someone needs to fix that controversy section because after reading it several times over I still can only guess about what it was that offended people.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.251.175.176 (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy over what exactly?