Talk:Environmental policy

message: Hello to anyone interested in EP.  I am seeking to list an external link with out running afoul of WP rules.  The site is called Environmentality and consists of a monthly, rigorously screened summary of recent EP related research and news from specialized journals and other sources. The justification for this site is that it would be impossible for anyone to stay informed on all the journals and news sources covered therein.
I believe that this site is extremely useful for everyone in the EP community, but then again I am also its editor and publisher.  Apparently this disqualifies me from listing the site as an external link.  So I am asking for anyone to have a look and then add the external link.  Here is the link html which can be copied and pasted directly into the external link editing window: *Enviromentality.
I appreciate your consideration.
Adam Cherson, MPA, Environmental Science and Policy 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.246.43 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 29 March 2008
:I have removed the link again as obvious self-promotion by the above. If others feel it should be linked, OK - but not by an anon promoter of the site. Vsmith (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed External Link 

message: Hi, I stumbled upon the sentence "There are three types of market failure that justify government action: negative externalities, the free rider problem, and the tragedy of the commons. ", and the corresponding section. Although I would agree that these three causes of market failure are worth mentioning in such an article, the sentence as it is at the moment is imprecise and partly misleading.
To my understanding, a free rider problem appears typically when (few) individuals free ride on a public or common good. The tragedy of the commons refers to the problem that many or nearly all individuals using a common good overuse the resource and thereby decrease it to an inefficient level. 
However, both the free rider problem and the tragedy of the commons originate from the presence of externalities, i.e. they are special cases of externalities. Moreover, I would strongly disagree that only negative externalities justify intervention. As an example, the ecosystem service approach tries to calculate positive effects of ecosystems (e.g. pollination, filtration). These positive effects are positive externalities which are at the moment unaccounted for and therefore demand correction. Flo tries to help (talk) 19:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed-up that section a bit; I believe it's better now. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 16:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  negative externalities, the free rider problem, and the tragedy of the commons 

message: The page has several problems. It appears to be aimed only at the United States while environmental policy has been practiced in many parts of the world and for centurles if not millenia. 
The page makes several factual errors about when environmental protection began. Environmental Laws in the United States were passed at least as long ago as 1890 with the Rivers and Harbors Act which prohibited dumping in navigable waterways. Early air pollution laws were passed in Britain in the 1950's after the killer smog. The Clean water act was first passed in 1960. Many medieval and renaissance towns also had laws about sewage disposal that are unmistakable acts of creating environmental policy. 
The page also gives the impression that environmental policy is only made in relation to ecological questions or ecosystems, and environmental impacts of human activities. These are matters of perception and dogma. Environmental policy is made to internalize the costs of avoiding negative externalities and protect positive externalities in the form of public goods from depletion. These dont necessarily have to relate to impacts on ecosystems.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Primacag (talk • contribs) 04:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Much room for improvement here. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:39, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a related need for an additional section of this article (and, ultimately, a new article on its own right), on International environmental policy. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This comparative study of the US & Australia might be a start: Killing the Koala and Poisoning the Prairie: Australia, America, and the Environment by Corey J.A. Bradshaw and Paul R. Ehrlich, 2015, University of Chicago Press Ping:  & . Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is too limited in intellectual scope 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Environmental policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150610225031/http://www.oecd.org/about/0,3347 to http://www.oecd.org/about/0,3347
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Environmental policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090224122439/http://www.rtcc.org/2009/html/foreword-2.html to http://www.rtcc.org/2009/html/foreword-2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Main focus is on Europe. What about the other countries? Need more information regarding this.
B7lam916 (talk) 21:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research and Innovation Policy 

message: Does the second sentence of this topic coherent with the paragraph? Externality was mentioned, but is that part of market failure?
B7lam916 (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale 

message: — Assignment last updated by Abanarsee (talk) 05:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis - Summer Session23