Talk:David C. C. Watson

message: Do we have any way of confirming that his dismissal was due to his creationist views? I know he made the claim in some of his books, but I haven't seen it mentioned by a non-creationist source. JoshuaZ 18:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (This reply may be a bit late but...) According to The Creationists, even his creationist supporters "whispered about his inability to control classroom behaviour and his failure to stick to the the prescribed syllabus." So it would seem that he was dismissed for incompetence rather than his views. HrafnTalkStalk 17:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for dismissal 

message: What did he study in Oxford? 
Wouldn't his academic background be a better characterization in the article title? I propose David Watson (field of study) instead of  David Watson (creationist).
some more details about his birthday and day he died?
Northfox 02:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  more info on bio 

message: Kevinalewis has just re-inserted claims on the basis of a broken link (can be found at wayback here) to a wild rant (in a now-defunct and obscure website for "articles and essays") claiming fraud by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The piece only mentions Watson in passing: "David C.C. Watson suggested to the president of the Oxford Union Debating Society that the Huxley Memorial Debate should be on creation vs. evolution. ... The society, wanting to completely wash its hands of the debate, even sold the copyright of the tapes of the meeting to David Watson who circulated a number of copies." as part of "a quote from Malcolm Bowden's book 'True Science Agrees with the Bible', pp 257-258". Malcolm Bowden is a retired engineer, geocentrist and member of the Creation Science Movement (a British creationist group formerly known as the Evolution Protest Movement). This is all ludicrously unreliable. HrafnTalkStalk 08:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the first comment on the RichardDawkins.net page, from a fairly prolific contributor (630 posts) on that site who appears to be a confident atheist, provide a reliable source? - Fayenatic (talk) 08:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This merely verifies the existence of the debate, not Watson's (rather tenuous) connection to it, or the wild claims made about it. HrafnTalkStalk 09:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was referring to comment # 1 by Magpie: "Interesting fact. David Watson who organised the debate, is the grandfather of my housemate. No, she's not a creationist." - Fayenatic (talk) 12:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Blog comments are never reliable sources. HrafnTalkStalk 18:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source 

message: biblicalstudies.org.uk is self-published (by  Robert I. Bradshaw) and so cannot be used as a source on a third party. I have removed reference to it in the article. I would also point out that we have no sources indicating that he was a prominent member of the Evolution Protest Movement (the main UK creationist group at the time, of which he was a member), or that he was otherwise notable for anything other than his 1976 dismissal.  HrafnTalkStalk 04:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, but I changed the source to Biblical Creation Society's Journal Origins.  This was then deleted with the edit summary "Rm questionable source for "leading" -- neither author nor publication is prominent". The British Centre for Science Education, which opposes the BCS, acknowledges that it "appears to be the second largest of the UK's dedicated creationist organisations" and "has some very highly educated members and associates". This acknowledges prominence on the part of the BCS, and its journal is therefore sufficiently significant to cite as evidence. The inclusion of David CC Watson in the table in the article (alongside John Calvin etc) would be meaningless if he was not considered a leading creationist at the time.  I therefore propose to use it to source a statement that in the 1970s-80s, he was considered a leading creationist in the UK.  I recall clearly that he was frequently cited in the Christian press at that time, to the point where David Watson (evangelist) had to publish as David C K Watson, but it would take time to locate specific paper examples of this. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't notice the addition (not a change -- as the URL was still to Bradshaw's site) of the Origins connection when I deleted. Still, while a slightly less unreliable source than Bradshaw's website this is hardly a cast-iron source by any stretch of the imagination, and this is still simply one obscure creationist making the description (as well as being a collective description, not a specific one). It is WP:UNDUE weight to include it in the article at all (as both the author and the publication have little or no prominence), let alone in the lead, as well as unacceptably failing to attribute it to being only this one obscure creationist's opinion, and to correctly characterise it (as only including him in a table, not calling attention to him specifically). HrafnTalkStalk 14:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated above, it was the opinion of more than just him, but out of the many published opinions from the 1980s along those lines, perhaps only a few can be found on line. No-one associates a contemporary with John Calvin lightly; I took it as evidence that he was recognised as a leading proponent of that view in that country at that time. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All we have is "just him", and he's nobody of any prominence. If you're going to have somebody stand in for the entire creationist movement, he needs to be somebody of substance. Per WP:PROVEIT, the burden of evidence lies with you. Given that Calvin lived centuries before Darwin published On the Origin of Species and thus the existence of modern 'creationism', the table's label is ambiguous at best -- particularly given that of the modern creationists, only Henry M. Morris is unambiguously a "leading" figure in any global sense. HrafnTalkStalk 19:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Leading" creationist & [[WP:SELFPUB]] 

message: ...four years after his death, the ICR still don't appear to have noticed the fact. His role as "Director of the Institute for Creation Research's Midwest Center in Illinois" was also apparently so crucial that they still haven't gotten around to finding a replacement for him. Did Watson ever live in the US (if he did, the article doesn't mention the fact), or was this appointment purely nominal? HrafnTalkStalk 19:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On closer examination, this piece was in fact written in 1980 (I allowed myself to get confused by the 2008 copyright notice). Another source has Walt Brown taking up that role in September of that year -- which means that Watson must have held it for only a short time (as of 1977, his dismissal case was still in the news in the UK). HrafnTalkStalk 05:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should put you out of your misery on this one. You evidently went back to re-check your own work, and did not realised that they had updated it overnight, after you lampooned the out of date version. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watson was such a titanic figure that... 

message: I note from the index on-line at Amazon UK shows that  Ronald L. Numbers mentions David C C Watson on three separate pages in The Creationists. This is not available in my local library catalogue, so would an editor with access to this authoritative work please contribute relevant material here? User:Hrafn, perhaps? - Fayenatic (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks. Sorry, I hadn't noticed that you had already used this source. Is there any clarity as to why Numbers was quoting him? It suggests some notability within UK creationism, other than for losing his teaching job. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both quotes were in discussion of American influence on UK creationism, and parochial resistance to such 'foreign influences'. Numbers treatment tends to be (very very) detailed and (from what I can tell from his footnoting) his archive of source material is extremely extensive. He thus often makes use of quotes that are chosen for relevance to the subject matter, rather than having to limit himself to what only the few, most famous, creationists have said. He sources the first quote to a book review Watson wrote in Biblical Creation and the second to a 'Letter to the Editor' Watson wrote to Christianity Today. This would seem to establish Watson as a contributor to the movement, but hardly establishes him as a notable leading light. I would suggest that neither quote, nor their source, is sufficiently noteworthy to be worth including in the article, particularly as we have no real context to place them in. HrafnTalkStalk 05:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine -- thanks again. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Creationists]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David C. C. Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820004937/http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/bcs_publications/bcs071.html to http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/bcs_publications/bcs071.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David C. C. Watson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525211452/http://www.churchsociety.org/crossway/documents/Cway_023_Watson-JohnPearson.pdf to http://www.churchsociety.org/crossway/documents/Cway_023_Watson-JohnPearson.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified