Talk:Adenosine receptor

message: Question for someone out there with more knowledge than I: Are adenosine receptors concentrated in the brain, or are they distributed across the CNS? I'm actually wondering in terms of caffeine consumption in particular... it's just not clear to me whether the caffeine is binding to the adenosine receptors across the body or it it has to get to the brain before taking effect. Thanks. --AK7 12:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An additional subtype of the adenosine A2 receptor has been postulated, natobly the adenosine A2B receptor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.49.254.6 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adenosine A2B receptor 

message: "and suppressing pacemaker cell function": If the effect is not to prevent the pacemaker function altogether, I think this would be clearer if the nature of the inhibition were more specifically indicated with another verb like 'depressing', 'preventing', re-shaping, or 'slowing'.
<BR>--Wikidity (talk) 23:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adenosine A2A receptor 

message: was just wondering does anyone know why adenosine binds to its receptors? what causes it? thank you 74cream 17:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! 

message: This page needs a major clean up
* "our observations raise the possibility that pharmacological blockade of A1 may have clinical utility" sounds like copy&paste from an scientific article our observations
* "The A1 and A2a receptors of endogenous adenosine are believed to play a role in regulating myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary blood flow[1]" looks like copied, too. Otherwise, why is there a reference [1] at the end?
* "The primary researchers, TJ Mader et al at Tufts University School of Medicine, have reported some promising results." also not good wiki style
* Most of the 3 letter abbreviations lead to nothing
* At least one the DOIs is wrong
* for sure there is more.....  
-- Panoramix303 18:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am just responding to the DOI comment.  You are correct that the DOI to Mader, et al. was broken.  This was due to the fact that the DOI as supplied by both the publisher and PubMed was incorrect and I download this DOI using User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool from PubMed (Diberri's tool is fantastic by the way, highly recommended!).  Therefore I have replaced the DOI with a direct http link.  Cheers. Boghog2 20:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  As for the other points, Be bold!, don't be shy, step in and fix what you think needs to be fixed!  Boghog2 20:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: It is better to have an article for each receptor. The bot ProteinBoxBot aims to create a page for each notable gene in the human genome, and will help to provide content. ADORA1 (to be merged with A1 receptor) and ADORA2A (A2A receptor) are already here, and could benefit from wikilinks and additional informations. --Banus 13:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major cleanup needed

message: Also, the reference link to senselab is broken.--77.57.195.215 (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A1 inhibitory and excitory??