lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Government of Michigan

message: Based on what I'm seeing in other areas of Wikipedia, the more standard name for this type of category would perhaps be "Politics of Michigan" instead of "Government of Michigan".  See :Category:Politics of the United States by state.  So I'd recommend either submitting this category for renaming, or making it a subcategory of :Category:Politics of Michigan.  Does anyone else have thoughts on this? --Elonka 02:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Yike

message: I've starated the article, but please if you have more info back up by sources expand it. CanCanDuo 02:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Started Article

message: There is a very huge difference between the Yike (Khmer) and the Likay (Thai). They may have been of the same origin and forked off from each other later, but today they hardly bare anything similar to each other. 
The Thai form is very Thai-ized and uses piphat music, while the Khmer form still uses the big Yike drums combined with an ensemble including string instruments like the tro. The Khmer costumes still retains a Malay feel (especially in the hom rong performance) while the Thai costumes are very glitzy and based on classical Thai costume. And lastly, the Malay jikey is probably the origin of these two theatre forms, if not, then they are are at least related to it. --Dara 13:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Likay and Yike and Jikey... 

message: A negatively-connotated Exclamation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yikes222 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yikes
Talk:David Backes

message: Backes has done a lot of charity work involving dog adoption. I believe it's noteworthy here. His nonprofit, David's Dogs, works with a shelter in St. Charles, MO, Five Acres Animal Shelter. From St. Louis Blues official page, David's Dogs: "The shelter has been dedicated to ending pet homelessness, promoting responsible pet ownership and advocating for animal welfare since 1973. Five Acres provides a much needed second chance for animals to find their forever home."
A few links/articles about his work:
David Backes taking up fight to save dog from death row
David Backes, Blues Captain, Flew His Plane 700 Miles To Rescue Three Stray Dogs
David Backes kisses all the puppies
107.202.192.167 (talk) 22:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal lover (Non-profit work) 
Talk:DeviousMUD

message: This article should be merged with RuneScape puppy441 - (lvl 80)OnRS 02:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: On the RuneScape article, it says "The game, which was never publicly released, used isometric graphics." but this article says it was released a a beta. So was it released as a beta? Or not at all? - • The Giant Puffin • 15:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It might have been released to selected beta testers. That's what they're doing with Halo 3. CaptainVindaloo t c e 18:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:Li Keyong

message: I suppose 904 and the relocation of the Tang emperor to Luoyang might also be considered the start of independence since Li Keyong's refusal to adopt the new reign name in effect meant that he declared the Luoyang government illegitimate.   Fornadan (t) 21:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but while he initially refused to use the Tianyou era name (still using Tianfu, as Wang Jian did as well), he eventually did do so.  It is not easy to properly date his independence, regardless.  --Nlu (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Start of independent rule
Talk:Desire (Pharoahe Monch album)

message: 64.150.5.14 (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2016
Talk:Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy

message: Why no exemplary text from the document? And how long is it--a one-pager or so, or as many dozens of pages? [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:588:c502:bb0b:e1b6:227b:376c:1ed1 (talk • contribs) 7:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As editors we shouldn't pick the text we like, we'd have to rely on other reliable sources discussing it. As for how long it is, take a look yourself, it's linked at the bottom of the page. Doug Weller talk 17:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The "List of signers" section is more than half the article and overbalances it.  Given that there is already an 'external link' to a verified list of signatories at a reliable site (DTS), I propose removing the list from here in about a week.  The article will be cleaner.  Any objections?
Bear in mind that a corollary of keeping it is that we would also need to add an equivalent list for the "...Hermeneutics" statement, which would make the article even more unbalanced.
Feline Hymnic (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an External link to a list of signers in the article. I think that that is sufficient. Editor2020 (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed tidying 

message: Does the statement define what the Bible is?  Presumably they are referring to the Protestant Bible (e.g. King James), but I wonder if they addressed that or simply took it as a given. Nowa (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the statement define what "The Bible" is?
Talk:Private militias in Iraq

message: Propose to merge this with Special Groups (Iraq) which covers the same subject. Any comments?
Golden apples of the sun (talk) 12:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear  Are all these militias Shia? Could there be a Sunni or Yzidi or Turkmen militia? If so, then it would be different from the Special Groups, which seem to be all dependent on Shia religious authority. I want to thank you for taking the time to propose the merger because pruning and editing are what we should do. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge article 
Talk:Li Cunxu

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Emperor Taizu of Later Liang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:30, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Caesar Barber

message: Merged the article, as per consensus. Safiel (talk) 01:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Fast food 

message: Imagine being such a blob Wikipedia admins merge your page with fast food. So much for body positivity. 2601:589:4102:6673:E8EB:2B72:BBAB:D59C (talk) 03:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lol
Talk:Rat na

message: I have changed the term "sauce" back to "gravy", as I feel that the sauce that is used in Rad Na fits the definition of gravy being a thickened sauce, made generally from a base (from meat, in this case as a stock), and thickened with a starch (in this case, tapioca). If my understanding of what qualifies as gravy is mistaken, feel free to dispute me on this. Quincetessence 02:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exchanged image to Thai made rat na. - Takeaway (talk) 21:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:The Reluctant Dragon (1941 film)

message: "three short cartoon segments of normal length and a short that is about 20 minutes": What is "normal length"?  Does anyone know how much animation there is in this film in total? Esn 07:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Amount of animation

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Hello, Smartie2thaMaxXx. Please explain why you insist on removing the text "the 1988 Disney/Amblin Movie" from the article? You just keep reverting other user's edits without explanation or edit summary, completely ignoring WP:Edit warring and WP:3RR in the process. I've checked your talk page and see that other's have queried your editing on this article and others, but you don't seem prepared to engage with them either there or on the talk pages of the articles in question. Perhaps if you followed good practice, WP:Etiquette and/or were more forthcoming about what you are attempting to accomplish and why you are so uncompromising about other editor's efforts which challenge your own views, many of these problems could be avoided? Please approach this as an attempt to resolve this situation in a reasonable manner. If you continue as you are at the moment, however, then I believe reporting you for your edit warring and 3RR violations will become inevitable. Bowdenford (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy removal, edit warring and 3RR violations

message: I've just seen this movie for the first time.  The thing that struck me the most in the Reluctant Dragon animated sequence was the heavy reliance on effeminacy and gay stereotypes.  Has no one written about this? kosboot (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I took care of it. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical assessment?
Talk:Shi Jingtang

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Emperor Taizu of Later Liang which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Per Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Chinese)#Names_of_emperors, the word 'emperor' should be put before the current title.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil  07:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Külüg Khan

message: See Talk:Toghon Temür#Names. Should there be a rename of this article? --Evecurid (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: So the religion portion of the infobox suggests that Kulug Khan was Buddhist than Manichean. Where is the source that claims or states this? If there's none it should be fixed. If it's correct, than a source and some treatment of that should be mentioned in the article.--SlackingViceroy (talk) 04:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: 1) The Mongol domain certainly NEVER went that far northeast in Europe, not in any factual recognition  2) Korea is not shown shaded - it was very much a thoroughly militarily destroyed/defeated country, utterly a vassal of the Mongols.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.1.232 (talk) 20:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  current map is ridiculously wrong
Talk:Josh McDaniels

message: Josh McDaniels has been tagged as the next Head Coach of the Indianapolis Colts. Samuelsportsguy (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2018 

message: I was bold and went ahead and added the recent reports that McDaniels will be the next coach of the Colts. No reason not to. It has reliable sources and is pertinent to his career. Rilech13 (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well now he won't be, but the question is this, is his one day as head coach worthy enough for inclusion into this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4A:403:3F70:8DFC:3C66:57E9:CED (talk) 06:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head coach of the Colts 

message: He’s gone! Change it 72.93.245.104 (talk) 04:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change it! He’s gone 

message: After losing to the Colts, get ready for some vandalism MrMiniguy (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Go ahead and protect the page 

message: he doesn't want to be there 158.140.53.52 (talk) 01:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number 10 

message: That para about being an infamous cheater doesn’t belong in Wikipedia 2601:400:C000:D350:E142:2EB8:873C:7CAB (talk) 02:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infamous cheater?
Talk:Peggy Cartwright

message: The reason I removed the reference to the lost pilot is because, according to The Lucky Corner website, the Our Gang pilot, Our Gang, is no longer considered a lost film.  A copy has been found that is nearly 13 minutes long.  See http://theluckycorner.com/rps/001.html  Perry Hotter (talk) 14:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Our Gang Pilot
Talk:Jack Davis (actor)

message: Maltin and Bann list Derby Day as his last short. Also, Fast Company is actually a 1923 short, just released in 1924. So it's not a cameo. I'll fix it. 75.65.82.153 (talk) 04:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Last short

message: I've removed a reference to later cameo and bit parts. I think it derives from Davis's entry on IMDb, which appears to conflate a number of people with the same name. There's a discussion of this here: http://littlerascals.proboards.com/thread/961. The LA Times obituary mentions no such work, and it seems improbable for someone who became a distinguished medic. I've put a note next to the IMDb reference, but there may be a better way of clarifying this. Wilus (talk) 12:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Variety obituary (http://variety.com/1992/scene/people-news/john-h-davis-100485/) confirms that Davis "never returned to acting" after Our Gang.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilus (talk • contribs) 13:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've left the sentence about Davis's family relationship with the Mitchum dynasty, though it also derives from IMDb and I can't find any confirmation. It would be through Cindy Mitchum, née Davis, if true.Wilus (talk) 08:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Later work
Talk:Paul Reese

message: Date of Birth = 17.04.1917 ?   per website     PlainDonut (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Talk:Camden, Maine

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  17:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 

message: When viewing the Camden, Maine Wiki site I noticed that the picture title reading St. Thomas' Episcopal Church is incorrect. The church in the photo is actually Chestnut Street Baptist Church. 
Thanks,
Jamie   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.207.24 (talk) 13:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Images only enhance articles. Please don't let personal opinions override usefulness. If the gallery becomes an "Ooh, add my picture too" fest, we'll deal with it then. At the moment it features sights from each end of the town and its center.
Why do I get the feeling these words will be ignored? - Dudesleeper 03:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: I live in this town... or rather, right next to it. I think mention of the schools (elementary and middle) is relavant. There's also Camden Hills Regional High School, but that's *technically* in the town of Rockport. SmakD 20:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools 

message: I reverted Intercourse218's edits because they were largely a copy-and-paste job from here. The editor's other additions were removed until sources can be offered, since good faith cannot now be assumed. - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 21:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert on 7/7/7 
Talk:North Central Texas Academy

message: This article reads too much like part story, part advertisement. It really needs to be rewritten to sound more like a bona fide encyclopedia entry. — Loadmaster 03:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a rewrite 
Talk:Darla Hood

message: "Dying under mysterious circumstances". That's a phrase for a detective story. It might mean "killed, but nobody could prove it", or it might mean "committed suicide", or it might mean "had a run-in with organized crime" or...who knows?
The Internet Movie Database quote does not help. It doesn't explain anything about the situation.
**
I don't often use this word, but my overall impression of this article is that it is flippant. Not respectful. Too much hype, and not enough about the person. Wikipedia isn't the place for fond eulogies. And it's not a place to gloss a person's real accomplishments and problems. It's an encyclopdia.
Without raising feathers, it seems that a number of the really central aspects of her life are missed in a sort of mix of quick-and-ready facts found on the Internet.
From this article, I don't feel I know anything about her, as a person, or as an actress. In fact, this article seems almost to "dance around the facts". For example, it's important that Darla's mother started her training...and that's totally appropriate for the article. But I have no "picture" of her. Was her mother "driving" her all the way through her career? Was Darla a professional actress all her life? Or did she really have to earn her living some way else? Why was she singing on record? Was that aspect of her life successful?
The "In Popular Culture" section is another name for "Trivia". As with trivia, the idea is to work the information into the body of the article -- or to omit it entirely.
There are over a dozen "peacock" words that are contrary to Wiki style guidelines WP:PEACOCK. Start by removing them, and the article will be on its way to giving her a fair treatment.
**
How could Spanky MacFarland attribute, in a speech, his own death to a broken heart? That makes NO sense.
**  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.131.205 (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Anticipating feedback

message: This doesn't appear to be correct. This contradicts the date given in the Internet Movie Data Base and other sources. A direct source, the birth year 1931 is on her tomb at Hollywood Forever Memorial Park. T.E. Goodwin (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date and Year of Birth?

message: At least two anonymous editors, known only by their IP addresses, have vandalized this article. They are falsely claiming that Darla Hood is still alive. I would try to revert the vandalism, but I don't want to risk a conflict with someone else's edit. JHVipond (talk) 20:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Lotus Mark I

message: I do not have any information on who created the Mk.1 replica, but the one I photographed was displayed in a car show on loan from Barber MotorSports Museum, in Birmingham, AL.  Besides motorcycles, Mr. Barber is quite a Lotus fan, and the museum houses a great Lotus collection, including an orginal Mk.6, a Mk. 9, two elevens, a 15, 17 and 19! (plus more).  Great place to visit for Lotus fans. Tom Bartlett 03:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:George Howe (printer)

message: Arguably the section detailing Robert Howe should be its own article, as he was an editor of several publications in his own right and including him here makes him an extension of his father, which he would certainly not consider himself (were he still alive). The paragraph also needs significant reworking to provide a more professional tone with more reputable sources. I intend to update it shortly; once this is complete, is their any objection to it being moved to its own article? Mhbeals (talk) 07:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Howe
Talk:The Sydney Gazette

message: Just a notification that this article will be the target of Wikipedia:GLAM/SLNSW a two-day GLAM training session at the State Library of New South Wales starting tomorrow (Tuesday 27th Nov).  Any Wikipedians interested in helping out online would be welcomed.  If this article is on your watchlist, please consider it an opportunity for some intensive collaboration over the next couple of days.  If you notice new editors making mistakes - be kind! --99of9 (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: GLAM target article

message: This article has been updated to include a greater level of detail regarding the newspaper's editorial and production history, as well as clearer citation for existing information.  Subscription information [100 in first years at sixpence an issue] could not be verified, but should be reinserted if appropriate reference is found, as this is valuable information. --mhbeals 23:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Further Detail Added

message: Seeking suggestions for additional information or material that would improve the usefulness of this entry? What aspects of its history or content should be included? Mhbeals (talk) 07:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions?

message: it doesn't contain a 'The', it does have a comma and its vol I edition I as displayed contains the entire title, not the shortened form. Dave Rave (talk) 03:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  title
Talk:Liang dynasty

message: This dynasty is also longer than the Qin Dynasty (like 49 or something compared to 15 in the Qin) 24.1.201.172 (talk) 02:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: long

message: There's a move request to decapitalize "dynasty" in the Chinese dynasty articles, as in Han Dynasty → Han dynasty. For more information and to give your input, see . --Cold Season (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request to decapitalize all Chinese dynasty articles 

message: To add to article: a map. 131.123.1.226 (talk) 03:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: Why does the article state that the dynasty began near Lake Dongting, in central China, when the capital was located in what is today Nanjing (in Jiangsu province)? 131.123.1.226 (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?

message: Was Buddhism important during this dynasty? 71.73.106.200 (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of Buddhism 
Talk:Holbon

message: NEEDS EVIDENCEOdst 03:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Even though many pages say that it is unknown where the first capital of Goguryo, It is in Huangren Autonomous Region, Wuzhishan 五指山. The site can even be searched by baidu maps. The relics are there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.150.26.68 (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks of Much info.