lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peyriac-Minervois

message: I've added the two people from Peyriac-Minervois that have pages on en:WP to this page (Barthas and Babou). The other people listed on the French page (Fabre, de la Sonde, Hudelle) could also be added but my French isn't good enough to do that. KetchupSalt (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importing Notable residents from fr:WP 

message: I brought some information from the French article to the introduction of this page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ossi Internet (talk • contribs) 09:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importing Introduction from fr:WP
Talk:Rhwng Gwy a Hafren

message: The map recently uploaded places "Rhwng Gwy a Hafren" straddling the modern English border.  While I believe the term refers to land between Wye and Severn, it only relates to Welsh petty kingdoms etc in that area.  It cannot refer to land east of Offa's Dyke, which was the border at Domesday book and before, and would not refer to those marcher Lordships incormporated into Shropshire and Herefordshire because they were marcher lordships not Welsh kingdoms.  the present map needs to be deleted and a more satisfactory version uploaded.  My understanding is that Rhwng was essentially Rednorshire and south Montgomeryshire.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Peterkingiron, thanks for the comments. I think you're correct, and can only suggest that my ugly twin made the mistake while I wasn't looking. The data used was from Lloyd's History of Wales, but the placement was my own effort. I'll upload a replacement image shortly. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 17:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel sure that no malice was intended.  I would suggest that you try to fill the space between the English border, the Wye and the Severn.  There might be room for arguing about the precise boundary with Saxon England, but that would do very well.  I think that your problem was probably with the space required for so much text.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: REvised map deals with my objections very well.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Map
Talk:Lead compound

message: is this lead as in head or lead as in feed?-- (James McNally)  (talkpage)  15:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronounciation 
Talk:Hot (American vocal group)

message: "Hot" appeared on one of those 70's compilation albums that was released some time between 1978 and 1980, with their only major hit "Angel In Your Arms". Larry Graham also appeared on that same compilation album with his song "One In A Million You". I am trying to find out what this compilation album was, and a list of all the tracks on it. Can anyone help?
72.171.0.146 (talk) 15:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if this is a re-release or a new comp, but it's got both tracks on it.  Chubbles (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Eleanor Tomlinson

message: Hi there, can people please watch for wiki linking to the "wrong" Will Owen.  The page holder of Will Owen (rugby union) is a different person, born in a different year, playing a different position, though both did play for Doncaster for a period.  This crops up periodically so can other page watchers keep an eye out for any future edits. Skeene88 (talk) Skeene88 (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband - Two Will Owens 

message: An artist by the name of Eleanor Tomlinson, resident of Yorkshire, has come up in the news recently as the artist of Paddington Bear meeting the Queen (may she rest in peace). She looks to be a pretty blonde lass but I haven't seen a clear enought photo to determine if it is Eleanor of Demelza fame or some other. Can someone please look into this? 70.51.89.39 (talk) 01:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: These are different people. Sam Walton (talk) 07:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paddington Bear Artist?
Talk:Volodymyr Semynozhenko

message: I've tagged the page with COI, as the original page was created and heavily edited by User:Semynozhenkoedit, which is almost certainly a COI user. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI assertion 

message: We now have a long list of references for this article. However:
#Some of them are in Russian or Ukrainian. I'm not sure if this is a problem for the English wikipedia?
#Most of them do not seem to mention the subject! This is definitely a problem.
MSGJ (talk) 12:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Eshkol-Wachman movement notation

message: This article has a bunch of text and then a bunch of citations, but that's not the Wikipedia style: there needs to be a way for the reader to link each specific claim in the article to each specific citation. Styles differ, but a common usage is footnotes with citation templates with footnotes; see WP:CITE.
*I took the first step with this change, which moved Teitelbaum & Teitelbaum 2008 from the "Publications" section to the new "References" section.
*But then I tried to follow that citation, and found that (1) it pointed to a book not published yet, and (2) there was a better citation that supported the same claim. It's better because it is freely available on the web and published in a refereed journal. So I replaced it with the better citation. This time, I used a citation template.
*Please see Autism for an example of how to format citations, and WP:MEDRS for more details on reliable sources.
Eubulides (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References need work 

message: There are far too many papers listed at the end in the further reading section. Either they need to be removed or go into a new "List of papers using Esckol-Wachman movement notation" article. Bellowhead678 (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many papers listed
Talk:Siege of Louisbourg (1758)

message: "The Siege of Louisbourg was a pivotal battle..." is nonsense. A siege is a siege. A battle is a battle. A siege can't be a battle.  86.41.39.94 (talk) 11:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: valid 142.188.60.206 (talk) 00:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense sentence in opening
Talk:Group 13

message: This is a better fleshed-out article than Żagiew, which is currently a stub. Since Żagiew itself describes a very close relationship with Group 13, at this point it may make sense to merge the two. Please discuss. -- Avi (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Two completely different organisations, only with the same leader. I see no rationale to merge the articles at all. --Lysytalk 16:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: 御犽真夜魂 (talk) 03:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 06:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 March 2021
Talk:Bedford Park, London

message: "First garden suburb". Brentham Garden Suburb also claims this. MRSC • Talk 16:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, Bedford Park was largely complete by 1897, before Brentham was begun. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: The source provided seems to say he lived there only in 1910 "(Presumed)". Are there any better sources? One year doesn't sound very long? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Karl Parsons]] 

message: There seems to be an issue displaying this image in the media viewer. The error message said "Error: could not load image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Focus_of_Bedford_Park_Garden_Suburb.svg". The image looks fine when reading the article. Liam2520 (talk) 06:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Strangely, for me it did load momentarily - it showed in the media viewer for a fraction of a second - but then it was replaced by the error message (which I've never seen before on any other file). One for the technical people presumably? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 06:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Something odd. How do we ask the techs? Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All I can think of is WP:HELPDESK or WP:TECHPUMP, but I'm not sure that's the right spot. Liam2520 (talk) 09:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Focus of Bedford Park Garden Suburb.svg
Talk:Photoacid

message: A large part of this article focuses on a specific photoacid, triphenylsulfonium triflate. This compound should have a separate article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. The article was pretty technically dense even though the main ideas of "photoacid" do not require advanced chemical knowlege. I took a swing at cleaning up (hopefully I got the content into the correct sections) keeping this application as the main topic. The reactions could benefit from diagrams (especially the radical mechanisms and thioether product structure, and the whole pyranine reaction.I think there are other applications of this specific chemical than the generic idea of "example of photoacid": Sigma–Aldrich mentions use in OLEDs, lasers, and polymers, which seem a little different than the general idea of just a cherry-picked example of an irreversible H+ source. Or at worst this chemical is specifically useful for it (therefore the chemical meets WP:GNG). It also helps organize the 'pedia by collecting technical data "per compound" independent of a specific application. Three other wikipedias have stub articles for it, so that can help with cross-wiki self-consistency. DMacks (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, perhaps I was over-reacting to the word "Split" which suggested to me the idea of removing part of this article. I think the triphenylsulfonium triflate example should remain in this article. But I do not object to also including it in an article on that compound which could include its other properties and applications as well. Dirac66 (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would definitely support keeping the example here if a separate chemical-article is spawned for it. Splitting demonstrates that the chemical is notable, and we already agree that this is one of its notable reactions regardless, so it's a good example of the reaction as well. DMacks (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal 8 November 2020 

message: The PAG-PAH nomenclature of Johns et al. is a little confusing. The photoacid generator (PAG) is not a molecule which generates a photoacid, since the acid generated (triflic acid) is not a photoacid but an ordinary ground-state molecule which is an acid. Rather a PAG seems to be a molecule which itself photolyses to form an acid generator which in this case is the dissociated ion pair [(C6H5)2S+.][CF3SO]. Can this be explained more clearly in the article?
As for the second example, I agree that pyranine should be called a photoacid. But the abbreviation PAH is more often used in chemistry for Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, which of course is a completely different concept. Should we specify that this is a different use of "PAH"? Dirac66 (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature confusing
Talk:OptOutPrescreen.com

message: Sigh, again we have the G11 misuse? There are references to it all over the net. Sarsaparilla (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Why would your social security number be a requirement?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkm3612 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubtful
Talk:Robert Hudson (company)

message: A section was removed which was cited to a construction journal which had absolutely nothing to say about Hudson, branding, post war, or any of the claims made for it. Qwirkle (talk) 20:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: reverted to his preferred version with. summary of . I have the cite open in front of me, it seems to say, as I mentioned above, nothing about Hudson at all, much less claims about branding. Perhaps Railfan23 could point out where he sees it. Qwirkle (talk) 20:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:OR]]
Talk:Siege of Louisbourg (1745)

message: First of all, changed the summary box on the right so that it indicates this was part of The War of Austrian Succession, whereas it previously stated it was part of The War of Jenkin's Ear. Clearly not Jenkin's Ear, which involved Britain and Spain, not France.
More edits and details are clearly needed. References and Bibliography sections are redundant and weak. Ivytoarmy (talk) 21:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lobuche

message: The article doesn't match the source it cites! The NMA (who "own" the mountain) say the furthest peak is "Lobuche West" and the near peak "Lobuche East", while the article says Lobuche East and Far East, and Lobuche West is a separate mountain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.108.253.133 (talk) 01:05, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cocoa Samoa

message: The wrestler wrestling as Sabu is not in actuality Cocoa Samoa.
Cocoa Samoa wrestled in Memphis under the name Sabu the Wildman, but the two are very different people. The real Cocoa Samoa passed away last January.
I'd like to start a page for the real Cocoa Samoa if anyone would be willing to help me set up the outline.
Baron cheese (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I brought this up on the Sabu talk page and removed the redirect. DX927 (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Category talk:Chemistry classroom experiments

message: I am looking for the titular experiment (usually used in school experiments, such as "baking soda volcano"). Anybody could point me to the article? There are many similar ones (coke+mentos, elephant toothpaste, black snake, carbon snake), but I couldn't find this specific experiment in this category, by searching in Wikipedia, or in Commons. I only found that it's some kind of neutralization reaction or Acid–base reaction, and there's a mention of it on Vinegar#Reactions, byproducts, and regulation, but nothing else. Commons search only yield :File:Baking soda and vinegar.jpg,  :File:Blue acid reaction.jpg, and :File:Реакция нейтрализации (2).jpg. Please ping me if you leave a reply. Thanks! Bennylin (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article for vinegar and baking soda experiment article
Talk:Nasdaq Commodities

message: For some reason the part concerning the the effect the current system of trading power has on prices for the consumers was removed completely. "Factual mistakes" was the reason stated. Can we get a discussion going about what was actually wrong. I put the part back, and just would like input on what exactly was wrong and what can be changed to make it more acceptable for everyone. I think the role of Nord Pool in deciding the price for the end-users of the electricity traded deserves a place in the article.
The section that you reinstated looks very much like an ill-informed POV piece from some discussion board. Bold negative statements like "Vattenfall, Statkraft and Fortum, are by law required to sell the power produced to Nord Pool" and "The outgoing price that Nord Pool sets is determined by the "last and most expensive kWh"" need to to cite sources, which will be hard to do since they are in fact, not true. --Frohrstrand (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Large part of the text seems to be copied from the Nord Pool website. Needs to be rewritten.Beagel (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issues

message: The ownership structure has changed, needs to be updated.Beagel (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, it depends if there is permission to use this info in Wikipedia or not. Even so, the text needs copyediting because it reads more like advertisement than encyclopedic text. Also the ownership structure needs to be updated.Beagel (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Actually I mean that Nord Pool Clearing and some other subsidiaries were taken over by OMX and Nord Pool Spot is separated from Nord Pool.Beagel (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, yes i just realized what you meant. I think it should be considered to have separate articles for Nord Pool Spot and Nord Pool ASA. The ownership listed in this article appears to be Nord Pool Spots. --Frohrstrand (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As Nord Pool ASA will be owned by NASDAQ OMX, information about Nord pool Spot AS was split into Nord Pool Spot article. Beagel (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership
Talk:Al-Sahafa (United States)

message: It has been pointed out that this article may contain a conflict of interest.  Please feel free to discuss specific complaints here so we can correct any problems with the page. Thelameduck(talk | contribs) at 16:08, 1 February 2008.
:It certainly has. I've just spent some time removing some of the worst excesses and stacks of repeated text. It still remains rather too self-promotional and it's interesting that almost all of the references are from the paper's scrapbook, rather than links to originals. (I've noted this, but didn't have time to search out original sources.) AIncidentally, the infobox says the paper is a broadsheet; the text says tabloid. Easiest way to check: got to the website I thought - except it's dead! Emeraude (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Category talk:Forest research institutes

message: It would be helpful to develop a List of forest research institutes article. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:39, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A list of forest research institutes has now been started. Much to add; contributions welcome! DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for list article
Talk:Acambay

message: Is this article about the municipal seat or the municipality? --Geniac (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The differentiation above would definitely help. It would probably get a "Start" if it were clearer on that point. Also, words like "we" are generally not supposed to be included in the text. John Carter (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Say, Niger

message: Because of repeated vandalism, this article has been protected so that only autoconfirmed editors can edit it. -- The Anome (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected 

message: There's alot of Information i want to share regarding this small Historic town of "Say".
The information is from Trusted Source. Ibdawud (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Suggest ans Edit
Talk:York, Upper Canada

message: There is information about the town until the 1800's, but what of the present? Was the town abandoned, or is it still in existence?Royalcourtier (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status
Wikipedia talk:WikiKnight

message: VigilancePrime (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cute.

message: WikiDragons may be a dying fauna with less than 30, but Knights are extinct. — Save_Us † 12:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nay," good sir. Knights do yet exist but bide their time until such a time as their altruism is once again found acceptable to the general populace. In fact one crossed paths this very eve though his name shall remain unspoken. JimScott (talk) 05:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WikiKnights are defenders of the Pillars.  I've definitely seen a lot of them lately.  They may not claim to be WikiKnights, but they certainly are.  I did a quick search...there is only one user who actually says on his user page that he is a WikiKnight. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)  18:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am training to be a WikiKnight. Not saying anything about it, just training from other users. Mhera (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes one active and one in training. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)  22:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

text: There are now two WikiKnights: Sir Relly Komaruzaman and Sir Rocktrotter.  Sir Rocktrotter just added the userbox I created. Sir Relly was the only one I found when I checked last week.  Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs)  17:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is Hopeful Farm. This is my Simple English account. Can I use the template there? For WikiKnights? --Salixa (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add it to the simple English wiki. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs)  03:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiKnights, species of none.

message: I would like to be able to award a user fitting the WikiKnight description with an award on their userpage. All WikiPrincesses should be able to give this award. :) What does everyone think? Thepoodlechef (talk) 04:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiPrincess dubbing WikiKnight
Talk:Read–modify–write

message: It would be moderately nontrivial, but attainable, to demonstrate a credible bridge between "consensus number" (pre-emptive multitasking) and CAP theorem; which in the real world often plays out in the classic tension between (availability, asynchronicity (eventual consistency), risk and performance) versus (consistency, synchronicity (blocking until consistency verified), safety and certainty).  Also, Paxos is worth evaluation a mention as a potential core algorithm. AnonymousRageQuit (User talk:AnonymousRageQuit) 16:26, 29 February (UTC)
This article completely misses the point so I am rewriting it. Quanticles (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)