Talk:Heckscher–Ohlin model

message: Hi, good info - erm, graph? Surely this is absolutely crucial for people interested in the H-O model. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.175.209.127 (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Graph... yeah. I'll work on it :). Ratibgreat (talk) 13:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Second thought, feeling too lazy. I'll definitely get to it later, God Willing. Ratibgreat (talk) 13:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest Graph

message: Wow! Good work everyone. I started this article a few months ago with just a few lines. Suddenly it has turned into an enormous, well-developed article. I guess that it is true, creating a stub CAN be helpful. . . Dvsuk17 20:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Well done

message: "a macroeconomic model" reads the first line. Isn't this also a microeconomic model? In fact, I've only studied this model in microeconomic trade classes. -josh
: well, you have two countries trading... that's already a country level, what can be more macro than that? however it uses tools from microeconomics to reach the the general equilibrium... i wouldn't mind to change it to "a model" instead of "a macroeconomic model"  --PBS27 19:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is a micro model.  Macro models include dynamics, even if they're focused on the equilibrium properties of a system.  The H-O model is a single period model and so it isn't a macro model. Gray 02:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No it is a macro model. The IS/LM model is also static at least in its most basic form yet it is clearly a macro model. Micro deals with agent behaviour whereas macro deals with aggregated behaviour. And a macro model can easily be static although most models in use in modern macro are indeed dynamic (and often recursive). So I am sorry but you aren't right about the model being a micro model. But of course it is based on micro economic analysis. Anything else would be silly wouldn't you agree? ;) MartinDK 17:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Macro, micro or just model

message: The term "autarky" is used a little carelessly in this article.  Prices in a closed economy are generally different than prices in an open economy, even if there's no trade going on in the open economy.  The closed economies aren't trading because they can't; they would immediately trade if they could.  The open economies aren't trading because they don't want to at the current prices. Gray 03:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Autarky and closed and open economies

message: This is an article about HOV -- not an article about theories of international trade.  I suggest removing that subsection.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.226.41.9 (talk) 14:38, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove Alternative Trade Theories

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Heckscher–Ohlin model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051211010115/http://www.wif.ethz.ch/resec/people/tsteger/Class_7.pdf to http://www.wif.ethz.ch/resec/people/tsteger/Class_7.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified