lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hungarian Americans

message: Bought a book on the subject, soon as it comes I'm going to totally re-vamp this section and make it featured-article-worthy. For right now, let's leave out people who just "happen to have Hungarian ancestry" or people who "were born in a territory that once was Hungary but are actually Austrians." Bulldog123 23:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Hungarian Americans 
Talk:IP fragmentation

message: How can they ensure uniqueness?  Would make a good note.  I'd guess that they are random and sometimes packets are reassembled in the wrong order. Tuntable (talk) 09:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are IDs generated 

message: As already noted by a user, there is an error in the 3rd schema about multiple fragmentations !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrnVrn38 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the Schema
Talk:King Lear (baseball)

message: Any references that he was nicknamed "King Lear"? Shalom Hello 18:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this link his real name seems to be "Charles Bernard Lear". Frankly I would question whether we need a Wikipedia article on every person who has ever played baseball in the major leagues. However, WP:BIO does state specifically that athletes qualify for notability if they "have played in a fully professional league". By that criterion, you'd be notable enough for Wikipedia even if you just had one at-bat in the majors, decades ago, and were never heard from again. --Mathew5000 20:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert L. Holmes

message: Ciao fellow Wikipedia editors: Just a quick note: I've replaced some content within the Moral Philosophy section for Robert L. Holmes. The new content is supported by independent book reviews which were published in leading philosophical journals as found on JSTOR and shown below.The Philosophical Review Vol 101, No. 2 (April 1992) Duke University Press pp. 481-484 On War and Morality Holmes, Robert L. Book reviewed by Diana T. Meyers, University of Connecticut, Starrs. Robert L. Holmes on JSTORThe American Political Science Review, December 1989, Vol 83, No. 4 (Dec. 1989), American Political Science Association Publsiher  pp. 1447-1448 Book Review: "On War and Morality by Robert L. Holmes" reviewed by Stephen R. Rock, Vassar College Robert L. Holmes on JSTORNous, Dec., 1992, Vol. 26, No. 4 (Dec., 1992) Wiley Publishing  pp. 559-562 Book Review: '"On War and Morality" by Robert L. Holmes by Steven Lee, Hobart and Smith Colleges. on JSTOR I hope it is helpful. Enjoy.160.72.81.86 (talk) 14:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a Moral Philosophy section
Talk:Tra te e il mare

message: A recent edit claims, "The Italian version is Pausini's most authoral album in that language, with her being involved in the writing process of eleven out of the fourteen tracks."  Pausini, however, begs to differ:
:"Escucha es el disco que por primera vez he escrito y producido sola y es el primero con el cual gané el Grammy."
::—Blanco, Patricia R. "Laura Pausini: 'Si paro de cantar, paro de vivir", los40.com [Spain], November 24, 2006.
Edit has been undone.Oskarg956 22:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most authoral" 
Talk:Deccan College of Medical Sciences

message: please volunteer to make this page a better one and keep the vandals and self publicizing at bay ! eatpepsi @ Wiki Project ! (talk) 18:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  who all will help make this article better ? 
Talk:Flag and coat of arms of Saint Barthélemy

message: There's no mention of the supporters. Are they pelicans or snowy egrets or..?   --- Robina Fox (talk) 08:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but I don't have any idea what you're talking about here. Largoplazo (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm talking about the birds on either side of the coat of arms (supporter). ---- Robina Fox (talk) 09:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supporters
Talk:Tribal Tech (album)

message: Uploaded a new cover with proper fair use rational.--Cdl obelix (talk) 13:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tribal Tech album cover
Talk:Angle of parallelism

message: The introduction begins with these two paragraphs:
"In hyperbolic geometry, the angle of parallelism   \Pi(a) , is the angle at one vertex of a right hyperbolic triangle that has two asymptotic parallel sides. The angle depends on the segment length a between the right angle and the vertex of the angle of parallelism. 
Given a point not on a line, if we drop a perpendicular to the line from the point, then a is the distance along this perpendicular segment, and φ or  \Pi(a)  is the least angle such that the line drawn through the point at that angle does not intersect the given line."
Normally "the distance along a segment" is much more clearly described as the length of the segment.
But the accompanying illustration emphatically does not show the lowercase letter a as denoting the length of the same segment. (Instead, it shows a along the asymptotic hypotenuse of the triangle, nowhere near the perpendicular segment.)
I hope that someone knowledgeable in this area will fix these problems.50.205.142.50 (talk) 19:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct about the figure being mislabeled. I have removed it and also fixed some language issues. I can replace the figure with a correct one in a day or so. --Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 21:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

text: --Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 18:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear description and unclear illustration that do not correspond to each other 

message: That is, should we have upright  or italic ? Lobachevsky (Halsted translation) and some other old sources (e.g. Becker & Van Orstrand) use the italic version, but a Roman (upright) font is easier in LaTeX documents where upright \Pi, \Pi(a), is default and italic \mathit{\Pi}, \mathit{\Pi}(a), takes extra typing or an explicit definition. I haven't done any serious literature survey. –jacobolus (t) 21:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Rule of thumb: if its a variable use italic. Here the function is a constant object, don't use italic. For instance, imaginary unit i should not be italic. — Rgdboer (talk) 01:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This "rule of thumb" does not match prevailing practice in pretty much any area of mathematics. So I’m not sure how useful it is. –jacobolus (t) 03:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the {{mvar|Π}} symbol be italicized?
Talk:L. Gardner and Sons

message: Never mind the time of year, get stuck in and delete the bloody lot. What's wrong with you? Some parts of this article almost make sense. Call yourself a deleter? Weiterbewegung (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wot? Still some pictures left? Shame on you!!! 

message: In case you hadn't noticed, this article 'has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability.Weiterbewegung (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, I think the article is well referenced, well written and a positive credit to the encyclopaedia. Have a cup of tea! Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 23:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What poorly researched and badly written dross
Talk:20 mm caliber

message: Does NATO have a standard 20mm round?  I know that the 25mm and 30mm cartridges are standardized as 25x137mm, 25x184mm, 30x113mm, and 30x173mm rounds, but I have not heard of a a NATO standard 20mm round.209.129.16.79 (talk) 00:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATO Standard 

message: This could be such an excellent article. I can't believe all there is here is a disjointed collection of half-facts that sounds like it was slapped together by 6 different editors, most of whom don't actually have a real clear idea what they are talking about (like me). An article on the history and the theories and practices of the 20mm caliber...a discussion of the 20mm vs 12.mm debate, and the 20mm vs larger calibers debate. Comparison of different types of guns in WWII, how two guns nominally of "20mm" caliber can be so different from each other. Inter-war and post-war development, the modern debate about high-volume 20mm fire vs lower-volume 30mm fire in an A2A scenario. Use of the 20mm in Vietnam; effectiveness as a ground-attack round. Comparison of different ammo types, discussion of different ammo mixes for different missions. So many possibilities, yet nothing. 
64.222.204.246 (talk) 05:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what happens when anyone is allowed to edit (like me). - BilCat (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

text: Please feel free to expand and improve the article as you propose, provided you have the neccessary sources. This is how Wikipedia works. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now cleaned the intro up. Feel free to expand - but not with that silly "disjointed collection of half-facts" that was there before.Snori (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened?
Talk:Valley of the Damned – Remixed & Remastered

message: First of all... concept album? Second of all... does this need it's own page? It's just a reissued CD. There aren't any new songs or major changes that I'm aware of.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.154.20.210 (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 
Talk:Ten'yō

message: :Plausible interpretations of this nengō?
*天賦 / てんぷ : n 1）natural talent  2）natural gift  3）endowment
*天質 / てんしつ : n 1）natural talents
*天賜 / てんし : n 1）heavenly gift 2）imperial gift
*天象儀 / てんしょうぎ : n 1）planetarium
*天資 / てんし : n 1）nature 2）natural elements
*天軍 / てんぐん : 1）heavenly hosts
*天運 / てんうん : n 1）destiny 2）will of Heaven 3）luck
*天遍 / てんぺん : n 1）natural calamity 2）striking phenomena in heaven and earth
:--Ooperhoofd 19:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this particular era name was selected?
Talk:MetaType1

message: METATYPE1 doesn't include any license, so it is non-free in at least some copyright systems. Should it be removed from the Free TeX Software category?— Preceding unsigned comment added by  89.79.199.91 (talk • contribs)  21:09:51, 9 Sep 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: License

message: METATYPE1 does include a licence. According to 
CTAN package page and
Readme file on CTAN
it's in public domain, the license reads:
This is METATYPE1 package -- a tool for creating Type 1 fonts using
METAPOST. The package belongs to public domain (no copyrights, copylefts,
copyups, copydowns, etc.).
--ChewbaccaKL (talk) 09:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really no license? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
:METATYPE1 →  – The http://www.ntg.nl/maps/26/15.pdf reference cited in the article as well as a further search at Google Scholar suggest that "MetaType1" is at least as widely used as the title of the article. The suggested title should resolve the current inconsistency with Metafont and MetaPost, which can all also be stylised in all caps/small caps. ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 October 2021
Talk:Burj Al Alam

message: in the Emporis website the Tower is 501 meters  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.163.86 (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct height

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 02:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Would it be accurate to call Burj Al Alam a Hyperboloid structure? - Team4Technologies (talk) 07:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would believe so.  Just by looking quickly at the images that are in the Hyperboloid structure article, it seems pretty much guaranteed that the Burj Al Alam is a hyperboloid structure.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 06:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design 

message: "The tower is currently under going pilling works or the tower is in Foundation stage of construction."
Is that trying to say the pilings are being driven for the foundation?  See Wikipedia article "Deep foundation" for explanation.  Paulburnett (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilling? 

message: From Google Maps it seems the current status of construction is "large pit filled with water." Has this thing been completely cancelled? I can't find anything about it from later than 2009; Fortune Group's website still proclaims a completion date of 2010 and the Tower's site is domain parked. Herr Gruber (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: can you please tell me if this is cancelled or not? this is another of my favorite towers and I really hope it will go up. Jawadreventon (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Google maps is now showing the foundation pit's been filled in, I'd say this isn't happening. Herr Gruber (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status 
Talk:SGS S.A.

message: 2SGSC  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.113.202.207 (talk) 05:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Serono

message: It seems that this company was the inspiration for the Serano Genomics international biotech company in the complicated plot of Ghost In The Shell:SAC, that too had problem with 'kickbacks' and was at the forefront of biotech research and application, and a similar moral dilemma.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.143.136.17 (talk) 19:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serano Genomics.
Talk:Stack (mathematics)

message: I moved the title with the typo, Stack (mathematicis) (ending in "-cis") to Stack (mathematics).
: 
The reason for moving this away from Stack (descent theory) was good but childishly naive.  It didn't seem to occur to the person proposing this that the lay reader seeing "descent theory" would probably think it's about genealogy, or otherwise fail to realize it's about mathematics.  Things like that should be borne in mind when choosing article titles!  If Wikipedia were supposed to be simply an encyclopedia of mathematics, that would be another story.
: 
But now we have this problem:  Some pages link to Stack (descent theory).  Linking through a redirect is not always really a problem, but in this case the present title seems clearly preferable.  I've fixed _some_ of those links.  Can others help with that too? Michael Hardy (talk) 18:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the remaining links in _articles_only_. --Cspan64 (talk) 21:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing some links to this page 

message: The adjective "stacky" is used at e.g. ; can it be defined here please? Equinox (talk) 13:56, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it has any technically specific meaning; but it usually means "related to stacks". For another example, see Behrend's trace formula, which talks about the "stacky way" of counting objects (namely don't ignore automorphisms). -- Taku (talk) 20:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does "stacky" mean? 

message: I think the example of a stack that is not a global quotient is wrong. The constant group scheme Z/2 x S_3 acts on both Z/2 and S_3 (both also constant group schemes, say we are over a field) in the natural way. The quotient stack [S_3 \cup Z/2 / Z/2 x S_3] is exactly B Z/2 \cup B S_3.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.244.140.86 (talk) 21:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct! Thanks for pointing this out. Username6330 (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong example 

message: Quoting from the introduction:
What does "within a restriction of the topological basis" mean?
  
I believe it is unclear what rôle is played by pullbacks here.
Mamuka Jibladze (talk) 12:11, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several unclear terms in the intro
Talk:Robert Rigby

message: The article falls a long way short of meeting Wikipedia's standards.  It needs expansion, clarification and updating in all sections and it needs reliable third-part references adding to support the content. It was tagged as being an unreferenced biography in Dec 2007.  Also subject's notability was questioned in Dec 2007. I've added one reference and a References list but that's not really enough.  Help required to fix.--Plad2 (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has a number of issues 

message: Some insider history. A school class from Forest Heath Primary School, Brandon, Suffolk, England was chosen to assist on the Rock Star album, in 1979. It was my class chosen and I am the 9 year old girl who sang the solo verse on the song Sleep in Peace.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.68.15 (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock Star Album
Talk:Robert Roberts (butler)

message: Can this be changed please to Robert Roberts (abolitionist)?  I don't know how to do this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.88 (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: There's a lot of additional information here if someone would like to expand this article: https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/robert-roberts-tells-all-about-how-to-be-a-house-servant-in-1827/ Bill (talk) 08:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: More info

message: I don't know if images of him exist but his book should be in the public domain? Was it illustrated at all? FloridaArmy (talk) 22:55, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Lonza Group

message: Could someone extend the main article a little to know what Lonza is famous for?
Everyone knows about Roche, Genentech, Pfizer and what not. But ... Lonza? 2A02:8388:1641:8D00:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialities 
Talk:Robert Sidney Bowen

message: I have no idea what any of these instructions mean.  I need to clear up Robert Sidney Bowen's "biography". He was married 3 times, once to my grandmother, Marjorie, and twice to his second wife.  He and his first wife had a son, Robert, who has three children(I am one of them). I don't know why this part of his family has been ignored but I want to find out why{warts and all). Please contact me at: bethspets@optonline.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.37.152 (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is uncertain how Bowen came to be credited with a number of aerial victories in WW I.  In any case, aviation historians with access to official British records conclude that he did not down any German planes.  Similarly, I could find no specifics as to RSB involved in test flying.
http://www.theaerodrome.com/forum/people/13742-robert-sidney-bowen.html
B. Tillman, 16 April 08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BTillman (talk • contribs) 01:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW I Record
Talk:Franke (company)

message: Some is from company web site but then images are out of catalogue but have PD tags, so company article ?
Added advert tag as copy edit required. - --BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert / copy

message: Where in nj, USA I can find CLEAR soap dispenser bottle for model #SD3450 2601:8C:417F:C820:181C:60B9:BF1E:87D9 (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where in th us I can get clear bottle for soap dispenser model #SD3450
Talk:Greece–United Kingdom relations

message: Why are the Elgin Marbles not discussed? In fact, why were they removed from the article? This is quite clearly relevant to Greece-UK relations.
Also, no mention of the UK recognising FYROM as the Macedonia naming dispute is mentioned, regardless that this is a key issue for Greece. Kupraios (talk) 00:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elgin Marbles 
Talk:RMS Sylvania

message: There are numerous problems with this article. The first paragraph fails to mention that the ship was sold, some might get the impression that she was rebuilt by Cunard. The "Concept and construction" section has little about either. The reference to the St.Lawrence Seaway is ludicrous. The Seaway starts to the west of Montreal and heads for the Great Lakes. The transatlantic passenger ships simply sailed up the St. Lawrence River from the Atlantic. To describe the ship as having been "rebuilt" in "1965" is completey false. She was refitted between December 1963 and February 1964 when private facilities were added to 80 out of 250 tourist class cabins. No other work was done and she was certainly not "rebuilt". When I have the time I will rewrite this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambak51 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

message: I travelled on the Sylvania in 1957 and one much-talked-about feature was the stabilizers, designed to minimize roll. (Actually, they imparted a rather unpleasant tumbling motion to the ship). While not a totally new idea, my impression at the time was that this was an innovation. If so, it deserves mention in this article, or the one on the Saxonia, the type of the class. I have no particular access to sources; anyone care to contribute?--D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stabilizer 

message: I would think it better if the picture in the lead were of the original Sylvania, with the black hull. There are several suitable pictures online (e.g. here), but I don't know what may be free in PD or CC.  --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead picture
Talk:Thomas Spert

message: I've provisionally deleted this material from the article as the ODNB article on Spert states that he died in December 1541:
In 1542 he was granted lands in Essex, and in 1544 he is shown as the owner of a ship called the Mary Spert, which was serving with the fleet against the French. He remained master of the Great Harry until 1550. His next promotion was to be 'Clerk Controller' of the king's ships. It is probable that he died soon afterwards; it may be deduced from Eden's remarks that he was not living in 1555.
It seems possible he was the owner of the Mary Spert, and perhaps some other citation for that can be found, and the information worked back into the article. NinaGreen (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events after Spert's death
Talk:HMS P222

message: P222 was apparently 'adopted' in some way by Swindon, Wiltshire, UK.
194.73.99.6 (talk) 16:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Any sources for that?.--Darius (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Swindon Connection?
Talk:Robert W. Tucker

message: It has just been reported that Rob Tucker passed away this weekend after a long stay at the hospital.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.122.29.109 (talk) 22:00, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He's very much alive and working in Santa Fe.
Robert C TUCKER did die recently, Rob TUCKER i do not know.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RWTUCKER (talk • contribs) 05:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert W TUCKER is not dead
Talk:Court of Appeal of New Zealand

message: Please see my move proposal at Talk:Court of Appeals#Rename this article?. --Mathew5000 19:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the article [[Court of Appeals]] 

message: This article lacks any content on the significance of the CA.Mrfebruary (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Significance of CA?