Talk:Babylonia

message: AMORITE PERIOD - There is not much detail about the Amorite dynasty, apart from Hammurabi
KASSITE PERIOD - Same as above really, pretty basic and patchy. Someone removed the detailed rev because of "Assyrian bias" lol...i never saw any tbh.
OTHER DYNASTIES - The current version just ignores them
NEO BABYLONIAN EMPIRE - Most of this is about PERSIA???
The whole article is patchy and doesnt contain much detail at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EddieDrood (talk • contribs) 14:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a pretty patchy article

message: So why didn't the writer say that Babylonia was completely PERSIAN?!, this includes much fatal errors and remember that you can not trust all websites of the sources you've used (writer), we can not include something from our own, the Iraqi Wikipedians must help us in this or the Iraqi history will go out like this!.
:Quite probably because Persians are an Iranic Indo-European people, and Babylonians were Semites and remnants of the Sumerians that spoke a non-IE language?  Just a thought. HammerFilmFan (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Babylonia wasn't completely Persian. It continued to use Cuneiform, Aramaic, and develop Babylonian sciences. Persians didn't come en masse to Mesopotamia until 800 A.D. 64.222.113.252 (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Babylonia: Persian?!, so what happened to Iraq?

message: Is Gnosticism the religion of Babylonians? Early Iraq is supposedly connected to this religion and a few scholarly articles do mention it as being practiced in Babylonia. Does anyone else know if this is the case and where to add it?
Twillisjr (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. If we read Gnosticism we see it properly refers to a religion that began to spread around the year 100 AD, in the eastern Roman Empire. I think there may be groups in Iraq today that were influenced by them, but it is an anachronism for Babylonia, which is going back to 500-1800 BC. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 14:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnosticism 

message: The one given was only accurate for some parts of American English. Rather than laundry list the variants, leave it for the Wiktionary entry and remember Wikipedia is . We should only include pronunciations where well-meaning readers could be genuinely confused. Is there anyone who's going to read this as baby-lone-ee-? If so, reïnclude the IPA, but include sourcing and the "British" pronunciation with the short I which is also shared by many Americans. — LlywelynII 02:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: WP:Further reading sections are almost always a bad idea since Wikipedia doesn't have any experts curating them and they gradually and unhelpfully bloat. Kindly restore these to the article as they are used to verify points being made:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* Le Journal des Médecines Cunéiformes (published twice-yearly from 2003 onwards)
If the further reading section is being recreated, include a gloss about each work explaining how exactly these works are more helpful than a Google search to someone learning about the topic. — LlywelynII 02:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Babylonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20150221193358/http://www.aliraqi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=69813 to http://www.aliraqi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=69813
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: How I can use this source on this article?
See Wikipedia:Citing sources and the associated templates. Dimadick (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Dimadick, I mean, which section of this article I can use this source's information?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahanshah5 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: Collect the more information of babylonia and sumerians 223.184.76.27 (talk) 14:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social