Talk:WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames!

message: Where does the release date "May 21, 2003" for North America come from? According to Nintendo of America's former site in the Internet Archive, it is actually May 26. IGN says the same. --Grandy02 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American release date 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090407135334/http://www.nintendodsi.com:80/iwataasks/vol5_page1.html to http://nintendodsi.com/iwataasks/vol5_page1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Party Games! is notable enough and different enough to WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames! to have its own article.
=== Notability ===
* http://ign.com/articles/2004/04/06/wario-ware-inc-mega-party-game
* https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/warioware-inc-mega-party-game-review/1900-6092937/
* https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/r_warioware_gc
* http://www.jeuxvideo.com/articles/0000/00004497_test.htm
* http://ign.com/articles/2004/04/02/wario-ware-inc-mega-party-game-hands-on
... among many others.
=== Difference to Mega Microgames! ===
While the meat of the game (the microgames) are completely the same as the Game Boy Advance version, Mega Party Games! is presented completely differently and is a different game. While Mega Microgames! is a singleplayer-focused, linear experience designed for one player, Mega Party Games! is a party game designed for two to four players. The two have different modes and different output experiences.
If there's no refute to a split, I'll move ahead with it within a few days. ~ P*h3i (📨) 05:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed 

message: While the meat of the game (the microgames) are completely the same as the Game Boy Advance version, Mega Party Games! is presented completely differently and is a different game. While Mega Microgames! is a singleplayer-focused, linear experience designed for one player, Mega Party Games! is a party game designed for two to four players. The two have different modes and different output experiences.
If there's no refute to a split, I'll move ahead with it within a few days. ~ P*h3i (📨) 05:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference to ''Mega Microgames!'' 

message: The name is clearly Mega Microgame$. Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 00:54, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The stylized name is noted under Notes, and it shouldn't be used in the article title or body per MOS:TM. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 01:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Paper Airplane Chase and Bird & Beans have articles on Super Mario Wiki, however these games needs spliting. Longplay Watcher (talk) 14:18, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - While apparently pretty not great, they both pass the Metacritic test. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Support. They are not just the minigames ripped directly out of the WarioWare title, but rather their own programs resembling them. RayanWP (talk) 20:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Honestly, if it's at the point where I'd have to provide a full draft article to convince people, I'd rather just allow it to remain a single article. It feels dismissive but there are more major games without articles to worry about while these minigames already have a place in another article at the very least. If people feel strongly enough to make a draft that may or may not be accepted anyway, then go for it. I think articles would be a good thought but it doesn't appear there is consensus.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you're being dismissive, it's just hard for me to judge without seeing how it would ultimately look. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can try. This might take me a while though. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

text:  What do you think of []? QuicoleJR (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  You could incorporate this tidbit. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  QuicoleJR (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

text: I see no reason to do so when no countervailing evidence has been provided. These minigames can be adequately covered in the main article, where readers would expect to find them, and as is standard practice. czar 11:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

text: And why all the information there can't be mentioned here? OceanHok (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I'm still of the mind that the way it's set up now isn't great, but also there's just not enough meat even to make a duo-game article. Oppose splitting. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 23:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spliting standalone minigames from WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames! for the DSiWare 

message: Cukie Gherkin (talk) 10:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources