Talk:Mike Wallace

message: Is there a reason that the word "tobacco" doesn't appear at all in the article? Seeing as how the Brown & Williamson story related to that subject, this is rather odd, no? 208.91.70.125 (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you feel something should be included, please find a reliable and reputable source and add it, with a reference. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: tobacco?

message: was there any truth to him converting to mormonism, when he marry his last wife ? I believe he even adimt he was a mormon. what do you think ? 
($$$$)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.160.153 (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Reliable source, please. --Javaweb (talk) 22:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: mormon

message: Guys, prisonplanet.com/articles/August2006/110806_b_Annihilate.htm this] needs most definitly to be in the article. --Striver 12:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another unsigned comment. The article, dated 2006, is not from a reliable source and it basically attempts to impugn Wallace as an anti-Semite by mischaracterizing his reportage on the difference between the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's anti-Zionist sentiments and classical anti-Semitic sentiments. There are many anti-Zionist Muslims and also many anti-Zionist Jews, and Wallace was simply trying to describe the difference between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 04:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Iran

message: "Who gave George Bush the duty to free people around the world?"
I took that out because it has nothing to do with anything and was just an excuse to link to some conservative "Media Research" site.  Apparently it's kind of like science but for Republicans.
: Another unsigned post. This page has far too many. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 04:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Quotations" 

message: in it, he actually questions the Shah's assertion that Israel and the Jewish lobby influence american foreign policy in the middle east. it amazed me that he could question something so obvious. maybe someone can add to this. Spoilermdc (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You would need a reputable source that commented on this "so obvious" something in order to add it to the article. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  interview with the shah or iran 

message: you have a chronological error in wallace's bio; you claim he was a founding anchor at 60 minutes when the show debuted in 1968 and that malcolm x was among the people he interviewed on the show; ' however, malcolm x died in '65, three  years before the show started. User:72.128.82.38 02:33, July 15, 2008
Wallace suffered from major clinical depression triggered by accusations of libel and a related lawsuit. 
:Seems unlikely that lifelong episodes of clinical depression were triggered by accusations of libel or a lawsuit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.30.11 (talk) 00:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. He suffered from major clinical depression all of his life, according to reputable sources. Also, the original statement itself is unsigned, as are an unusually high number of messages on this page, all of which seek to attack Wallace. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 04:11, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: Wallace has died. This was announced just 10 minutes ago on CBS Sunday Morning. Night Ranger (talk) 14:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: It appears from Buff Cobb that Wallace's first TV appearances may have been as co-host with her of a couple of TV talk shows.P0M (talk) 04:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing content 

message: He owed his Supreme Court Position to Faubus]. If you can find a non-biased reliable source, repost it. --Javaweb (talk) 01:21, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is CSPAN's complete video and transcript for the event. I'll leave to other editors to decide how important this was to Wallace's career. --Javaweb (talk) 01:28, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobb is not an impartial source 

message: I have been editing at Wikipedia for more than 11 years and i have never seen a talk page with as many unsigned comments and skipped lines as this one. It looks like people went in and removed their signatures or the signbot signatures. An hour of historical database forensics could set things straight, but i do not have the time to give to it. However, it certainly looks like vandalism of some sort, because Wikipedia is built upon good faith signed editorial comments. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 04:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This talk page has troubles 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mike Wallace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609233936/http://www.mrc.org/Profiles/wallace/welcome.asp to http://www.mrc.org/Profiles/wallace/welcome.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)