Talk:Good-Bye to All That

message: A section about how this novel lost Graves most of his friends and literary connections should be added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.253.56 (talk) 20:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact of publication of Graves' life?

message: "He devotes a large part of the book to his experiences of the First World War, where he gives a detailed description of trench warfare, including the tragic incompetence of the Battle of Loos. Many readers will be interested in his secondhand description of the killing of German prisoners of war by British, Canadian and Australian troops. Although he had not witnessed any incidents himself and knew of no large-scale massacres, he knew of a number of incidents where prisoners had been killed individually or in small groups, and he believed that a large proportion of Germans who surrendered never made it to prisoner-of-war camps.
Graves was severely traumatized by his war experience. After he was wounded, he endured a five day train journey amid squalor and unchanged bandages. The trench telephone scared him such that he never lived with the technology for the rest of his life (he received an electric shock because the line was struck by lightning). Upon his return home, he describes being haunted by ghosts and nightmares. Laura Riding, Graves' lover, is credited with being a "spiritual and intellectual midwife" to the work, which made him famous.[2]"
Only the last sentence of that is opening material.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.253.56 (talk) 23:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The introduction could use some work

message: It says that 2 authors "famously savaged a copy". What is savaging it? Criticising it? Tearing it up? Committing some deviancy? What was that about, anyway? – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And why? zafiroblue05 | Talk 18:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Edmund Blunden and Siegfried Sassoon, deeply suspicious of the work, famously defaced a copy (now housed in the Royal Welch Fusiliers archive in Caernarfon).
--Quadalpha (talk) 22:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What does "savaging" mean?

message: There are currently two articles ...
* - created on 16 February 2002
* - created on 13 June 2007
Apparently, both  and  have recently made extensive edits to the first one, and then Ivankinsman "cloned" it with a different spelling, and tried to delete the first one by "blanking" it ... since neither editor bothered to link the articles to their discussions, I have only recently become aware of the fact that the second one exists, having previously left comments on the talk page of the older one.
Please see "Page blanking" on Ivankinsman's talk page and the comments that follow it ("Good-[bB]ye to All That" and "Duplicated article") for more detail.
Today I have added  tags to both, and suggest that the older one be retained (a) because of its longer edit history, and (b) more articles are linked to it, either directly, or through redirects ... Happy Editing! —72.75.70.147 10:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the newer one is more accurate now - and complete e.g. the literary themes section - in terms of the copy in the article and I thought it wouldn't need too much thinking in terms of the redirects. I would STRONGLY ADVISE KEEPING THIS ONEIvankinsman 06:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Whichever, a merge is a no-brainer - the only choice should be for the method and eventual name required. Of rather the other way round; which is the prefered name then the method should retain the most history and absorb the best content. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly recommend that the edit history going back to 15:15, 16 February 2002 be retained ... that is also the one with the most articles linked to it ... as for which name is used, I guess the one with the lower-case "bye" is preferable. —72.75.85.234 16:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge: it's very hard to see any grounds for opposition to this. Xn4 22:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge duplicated articles 

message: I saw an edition of Aeschylus' Agamemnon recently, in a translation which doesn't seem to be online, not at Project Gutenberg nor anyplace else.  In the scene where the Herald makes it back home to Greece and delivers his speech about how rough the war was and how relieved he is to have survived, he speaks of the dead.  The war is over for them, as it is over for him, and "goodbye to all that / Glad I am to say it."  If someone has access to a print copy and can verify this, it would be an interesting nugget to drop into the article. The Sanity Inspector (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, the meaning of the title was good-bye to England, and to many of the preoccupations that were considered important in his earlier life, including trying to maintain middle-class respectability, as he went off with Laura Riding (Jackson).  The Laura Riding thing didn't work out too well, but he lived outside England from then on (except during the WW2 years). AnonMoos (talk) 03:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did the title of the book come from? 

message: *:Wasn't Graves a classical Greek scholar, familiar with the classics in the original?  Wouldn't it seem likely that he encountered the words in some form of the original and identified strongly with both the meaning and the context? 60.240.32.226 (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, the meaning of the title was good-bye to England, and to many of the preoccupations that were considered important in his earlier life, including trying to maintain middle-class respectability, as he went off with Laura Riding (Jackson).  The Laura Riding thing didn't work out too well, but he lived outside England from then on (except during the WW2 years). AnonMoos (talk) 03:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 2023

message: Is it fair to use the term, "Plot description" as a heading in an article about an autobiography?  That hardly seems NPOV.  Pehaps "Synopsis" would have fewer connotations of fiction?  --Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.119.219 (talk) 07:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Plot description"

message: This article has been reverted to an earlier version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Text merged into this article from Good-bye to All That duplicated at least in part material from the book The Modern British Novel (see ). Other content added by the same contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: Almost a quarter of the text deals with the killing of German prisoners. This seems rather disproportionate for second-hand stories about something which Graves himself never witnessed and which occupy less than 1 page in a 300-page book.RichWA (talk) 06:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Used to be a small part of a large article, until most of it was deleted for being a copyright violation... AnonMoos (talk) 09:18, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Killing of prisoners

message: I just created several, but more work is needed. The lead now contains information not in the body, which needs redistributing. Rumiton (talk) 10:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections