lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pebble Mill Studios

message: I've just gone through the article and removed any subjective statements that could be seen as potentially 'biased', as well as rearranging it for effect. I've played around with the syntax in the first paragraphs, since they each read like opening sentences and didn't quite fit together. It may need a little more expansion, though. -- Sasuke Sarutobi 21:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: Any idea why it was called Pebble Mill or what a pebble mill is? This has always bothered me a bit. Pebbles do not need milling. Pebble bread would not be nice. 81.131.25.75 (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: The article would look much better with a picture if anybody can source one without copyright problems. Maybe somebody has a personal snapshot from the 70s or 80s they could scan and upload? --Ef80 (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needed 

message: Studio 7 certainly was a working radio studio as part of the network radio operation during the 1970's. It comprised a small talks studio and cubicle and was adjacent to the comms centre and an NCA "down the line" contibution studio. I recall making some feature links recordings in the mid 1970's in Studio 7 and I believe it was also used for regional news opt outs on Radio 4 VHF before these were scrapped due to the prevalence of local radio.  The suites of radio studios areound the first floor corridor were originally designated 7, 8 and 9 and were intended for regional radio. When local radio was incorporated into the complex 7 went to network use and 8 and 9 became BBC Radio Birmingham studios 2 and 1 respectively.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.11.12 (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studio 7 

message: I was wondering if Pebble Mill Studios should remove section 5, put 5.1 in section 2 as Outside Broadcast Television with 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3 becoming 2.8.1, 2.8.2, 2.8.3.
Before	After
5.1   	2.8
5.1.1 	2.8.1
5.1.2 	2.8.2
5.1.3 	2.8.3
Same goes with Radio.  Winhelper (talk) 16:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Tvcameraop (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearrangement
Talk:Camden Park (amusement park)

message: What days in October 2023 is Camden park open 172.242.82.9 (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but this is meant to be an encyclopedia article, not a park schedule—the schedule will change every year, and unless there are major changes to the park or its operation, that sort of thing doesn't belong here.  Camden Park's website should indicate what their plans are for this fall.  P Aculeius (talk) 14:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Days open in October
Talk:East Huntington Bridge

message: The bridge was renamed back to East End Bridge (won't let me move to official designation at East Huntington Bridge) because,
* Official documents from WVDOH state that this is the East Huntington Bridge,
* Renderings show this as the East Huntington Bridge,
* Other terms are slang or informal.
The press-release posted on the Herald Dispatch was not WVDOH sanctioned. It appears nowhere on WVDOHs web-site, and my contacts at WVDOH stated that they were not informed of the renaming. The press-release also states that it was produced by Marshall, leading me to believe it is an informal designation, on top of the two other slang terms for this span. For the sake of history and per official designation, it should be kept at East Huntington Bridge (East End Bridge for the interm).  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe your contacts are misinformed, as I traveled the bridge last Thursday to find an official WVDOT highway sign designating it the Gatski bridge.  I'm not going to change the article, but I think you might want to check with your sources again. Oherian 14:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I called him up this morning and its considered a "secondary designation". The "primary designation" is still the East Huntington Bridge on planning documents, and for historical purposes IMO we should be using the original name. I'm going to create a page with the new name and have it redirect to this page.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like the perfect thing to do to me.  This trend of renaming things after people grows old on me quickly.  Maybe because I don't have anything named after me?  ;-) Oherian 18:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge renaming
Talk:Unitrends

message: Please see WP:SPAM, WP:CORP, & WP:NPOV.  Wikipedia is not an advertising service! -- Austin Murphy 15:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jesus, its been like this for that long? ✶Mitch199811✶ 16:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, it was way worse. ✶Mitch199811✶ 16:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration

message: Discovered that the give link for "Archival Finding Aid of the UNRRA records" is no longer valid. Not sure where of if, the document is available... Link given is: 
https://archives.un.org/sites/archives.un.org/files/files/Finding%20Aids/Predecessors/AG-018_IRO.pdf XTOC6 (talk) 18:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link
Talk:Creative MuVo

message: Is the MuVo series still alive?
I thought all new flash players released by Creative was now called Zen, thus killing the product name MuVo.
:I don't know, I don't follow up on this article anymore, it's practically dead. By the way, sign your name User:Ran4
:Sans Nom Reeves 03:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really... The MuVo series is basically a group of physically similar players (except the MuVo², MuVo Slim and MuVo Vidz, of course), and the latest models, the V100 and the S200 was released last year, while the N200 was rebranded as the ZEN Nano (Plus). --Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits) 06:23, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still Alive?
Talk:Acromioclavicular joint

message: The quote about the Weaver-Dunn procedure only being 50% successful ought to be referenced.  It may be the case with the strict "Weaver-Dunn" but I've heard of Modified Weaver-Dunn surgeries being 75% to 95% succesful.  Unfortunately, I can't prove this sucess rate, but on most papers or abstracts I've read, the success rate is much higher, although it is short turn.  Even take a look here Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Gore-Tex Tape  (Stone Clinic)   Almost all surgeries listed at the bottom mention a good majority having either Excellent or Good results. 24.0.33.86 15:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It says in the article that the AC joint is a pivot joint. I believe it is a gliding synovial joint, so I changed that paragraph. Provophys 22:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  type of joint 
Talk:Mexican film

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 15:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Please note, the article Mexican cinema that is proposed as the article to merge into, has been moved to Cinema of Mexico, to standardise it with the 80-odd other national Cinema of ----- articles. I will also edit the merge notice on the article to reflect this. Gram123 13:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Typhoon Nida (2004)

message: Nice. I'll put it at a start for now, but I think it can easily became a B class, though I'm not so sure about GA. Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 17:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, merge it unless new information can be found. --Coredesat talk! 19:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: If this gets merge, which I now agree it should, I think I'm gonna move this to my sandbox to work on. I'll just need help with the JMA stuff. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 22:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Exactly what I mean by there's errors in the intro - PAGASA also don't use the term "super typhoon". – Chacor 10:06, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I doesnt matter. Storm05 12:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: And besides JWTC is better and accurate than JMA. Storm05 12:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely wrong. It does matter, otherwise it's false info. And JMA is official in this basin. If you can't accept that then I'd say don't do WPac articles, because all you're giving is wrong info. – Chacor 13:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CIV, WP:TROP, WP:AGF-for peak sake! Storm05 13:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Chacor 13:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CIV-Storm05 13:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A warning is not incivil. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia and be incivil, you will be blocked. – Chacor 13:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: There was nothing incivil or assumption of bad faith in that. Don't throw around policy when you're in the wrong. – Chacor 13:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment/Merge

message: Whats a Major Typhoon? - The term isnt used within the WPAC by any of the warning centers - Also the WMO do not meet in the spring for the PTS's, they meet during the winter months of November December January.Jason Rees (talk) 17:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have addressed those points.  Major typhoon is a relic of the original editors of this article.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats a major typhoon?
Talk:Wales West and North Television

message: Where were the studios / head office of WWN? --Wrh1973 15:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I see an anon has added a "Slogans used" section.  Unless I miss my guess, this "slogan" is simply the IBA-required opening from the channel's startup sequence (as can be heard at Transdiffusion), and so is not actually a slogan at all.  Does anyone know different, or shall I cut this? Vashti 00:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's not a slogan, it's just the required announcement. I don't think ITV stations went for slogans in the early 60s! Chop it. -- Arwel (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. :) Vashti 03:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slogans

message: There are a few gaps in this article. Was tehre a break in broadcasting before TWW took over? Were existing Teledu programmes broadcast, and did these continue to be produced? How much of Teledu's workforce was kept on? And does any of the channel's output survive today? --MartinUK (talk) 13:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More needed
Talk:Don't Stop the Carnival (novel)

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata
Talk:John Randolph Tucker High School

message: you forgot to mention how superior tucker is in comparison to Hermitage High School
Is this school notable at all? Why is there an encyclopaedia article about a common or garden school on Wikipedia? Even the person the school is named after is not notable enough to have an entry. Alun 17:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Czecho resistance to Nazi occupation

message: I removed this sentence from the intro because it is uncited:
Studies of the Czechoslovak people during World War II generally agree that the Czechs “learned more to adapt than to resist.”
Mujinga 15:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: You should consider the title of the article to be accurate. Czechoslovakia was not only a Czech country. During the war, there was also a strong Slovak reizstence and Slovakia was also occupied by nazists, even though in the year 1944. The resistance to occupation resulted in heavy fighting during Slovak National Uprising.--84.47.25.1 05:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title of article is not accurate
Talk:Montana Jones

message: I made a big edit at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Montana_Jones&oldid=85764203 , should the copyedit banner be removed? --Lordgilman 01:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I get that the show was inspired by Indiana Jones, but is that template really appropriate for the page?  It seems a bit out of place.-Vercalos (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Seems like there were no objections in the last four years, so I am boldly removing the template. decltype (talk) 10:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indiana Jones Template
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject KYOVA Region

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources
Talk:In God We Trust: All Others Pay Cash

message: These short stories, later retold in A Christmas Story, were retellings of the stories he told on his radio program.  It would be nice to find a source to support that. Dlabtot (talk) 01:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  based on his radio stories 

message: The statement in the current article that the book made the NYT best seller list in 1966 is demonstrably false. I just checked every such list -- which appeared in the Times' book review section every Sunday -- and it is not there. Nor does the cited NYT obit of October 18, 1999, support the specific assertion. I am unable to locate a free copy of the cited Chicago Sun-Times article, though. Of course, since the foregoing is "original research," not otherwise appearing in a published source (to my knowledge), Wikipedia guidelines would likely preclude me from merely deleting the erroneous statement in the current article. Don Columbia (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Times best seller list assertion is false 

message: Continuing with the closed discussion, where the last-posted comment regards the publisher's punctuation to be "authoritative." In support thereof, the comment links to a current listing for a decades-later edition of the book now published/distributed by Crown/Penguin Random House (which ultimately absorbed the original publisher), not a contemporary source by the original, first-edition publisher, Doubleday. Doubleday ran a full-page ad for the novel on October 23, 1966, in the Sunday book review section of the New York Times. In the ad, Doubleday twice referred to the book as "IN GOD WE TRUST, ALL OTHERS PAY CASH," employing a comma, not a colon! Having said that, I think Ol' Shep would have derived much amusement from the discussion, and could have built an entire show on WOR radio, or even a college concert, around it. Excelsior! Don Columbia (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation between In God We Trust and All Others Pay Cash 

message: Eugene B. Bergmann repeatedly said he was not Shepherd's biographer, including in his last post on June 27, 2023, not long before his death:
I trust that you will understand why the book is NOT a biography, but a description and appreciation of Shep’s genius—and thus why front matter of the book is crucial–ebb
The openings of my EXCELSIOR, YOU FATHEAD! are meant to explain that the book (despite the publisher’s unwanted and inaccurate flyleaf comment) that it’s a “biography.” Rather it is a very personal approach to what and why Jean Shepherd is of such importance to each listener’s thought processes that assist us in our way of seeing and responding to our world. That is the essence of why the book was written this way. Jean Shepherd would expect no less.''
See: https://shepquest.wordpress.com/ Don Columbia (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eugene Bergmann not Shepherd's biographer
Talk:Hajj Nematollah

message: This article needs to be cleaned up to conform with the Wikipedia Manual of Style (WP:MOS).  It also needs categories, and references, per Wikipedia:Verifiability. The tags that have been added to the top of the article, will alert other Wikipedia editors who know how to do these things, though the response can take awhile (potentially several weeks).  If anyone else (even anonymous editors) would like to assist with the article in the meantime, please feel free.  After the actions are completed (categories added, article cleaned up, etc.), the respective tags can be removed. Please let us know if you have any questions. --Elonka 16:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just made an attempt at wikifying the article, and the result was a lot of red links. Thus I've left the  tag in place. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming the information is verifiable, Forqan ol-Akhbar should be moved to its own article. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yesterday 69.201.146.55 (talk · contribs) removed the tags , , and  from the article without addressing these issues. Without an actual response from 69.201.146.55, it's hard to call this a "dispute", but I have requested a third opinion on the matter. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please disregard the sentence about WP:RF3O, I was confusing this with a different article involving the same anonymous editor. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Is Hajj Nematollah his birth name or is Hajj, in this case, an honorific? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His name was Hajj Nematollah from childhood, so thats his name, not something people added on at latter time.--Persianhistory2008 02:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't had much luck trying to look up this person by name. I'm having trouble finding much about this person in general, so I have placed additional comments in a new "Verifiability" section. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Most of the books are in French, Farsi and Kurdish, so that is probably the reason why. Also the MANY different spellings of his name. Will write more about this in the section below.--Persianhistory2008 04:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Ray Roberts (American football)

message: ==Untitled==
this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 06:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added

message: this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 06:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pacific Explorer

message: Is the Dawn Princess mentioned in this article the same as the wikiarticle?  —EncMstr 19:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  News item 
Talk:Ingo Hasselbach

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 08:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight

message: After a protracted argument on the Dyson sphere talk page that seemed to be going nowhere, I decided to consolidate and restate the basic issues concerning this section in general, and one particular instance that has proven especially vexing, as I see them.  I hope that members of this and other related WikiProjects might weigh in and give their opinions.  P Aculeius (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Dyson_sphere#Dyson spheres in fiction]] 

message: There is this List of missions to Mars, and there are three lists that are mostly duplicates, List of Mars landers, List of Mars orbiters, and List of artificial objects on Mars. I think both can be safely redirected to the main list without any loss of content, with a little merge from the third article (section on garbage on Mars). What do you all think? Artem.G (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed: having all four lists is ridiculous Redacted II (talk) 21:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated lists for Mars missions 

message: Should Euclid (spacecraft), as a space telescope, not be italicized (per James Webb Space Telescope, Hubble Space Telescope, etc.) and even the name changed to reflect its status as a space telescope. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Euclid italics discussion: [[Talk:Euclid (spacecraft)#Italicizing Euclid]]
Talk:Pari passu

message: It seems to me that a subsection devoted to the discussion of the motto of a fairly unremarkable Canadian high school is a little out of place in an article primarily devoted to the usage of a legal/financial term. I think a "see also" note at the bottom pointing to the high school page, where the motto is also discussed, would be more appropriate. Without objection I will enact this change. Mnc4t 16:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Unreferenced. Plus: it's logical, but is that phrase biased?:
"In the European Union, as the result of the Greek government-debt crisis, a retroactive Collective action clause passed by the Greek government with the support of the ECB and IMF, enabled the debtor (who also controlled the courts) to impose a 70% loss of the creditors, more than 75% of whom had voted in favour of the cut. In this case, pari passu means that all private-sector investors are equally mistreated." -Shtove 22:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  equally mistreated 

message: Your third paragraph example of pari passu inheritance is confusing. The fact that (child) A dies before (child) B will not delay or change the % inheritance of the testator's grandchildren. I think what you are trying to say is "if A dies before the testator, and B has more children after A's death but before the Testator's death, upon the Testator's death, the shares of all grandchildren will be smaller." 
The difference between per stipes and pari passu inheritance is that in a per stipes distribution the children of A (the Testator's grandchildren) will always divide their parent's share; in pari passu, the grandchildren's share will be equally decided by the number of grandchildren living at the Testator's death.
Lesteralonzo (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "per capita" in pari passu inheritance 