Talk:British Pregnancy Advisory Service

message: The Ann Furedi article is thin and has been in a repeated deletion discussion (controversy?). Perhaps it should be merged with this article?--Anchoress 04:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly agree.  Not sure the Furedi article is controversial, just wafer-thin and not well written.     It's also questionable that the woman is worthy of a separate WP article. Deep 13 07:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PS.  Nicely written article! Deep 13 17:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Deep.--Anchoress 22:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text:  Seems like a good merge.--Peta 07:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag 

message: Why should the categories be formatted like * instead of Category:Foo?  It causes this article not to alphabetize in it's categories; what's gained by that? -GTBacchus(talk) 07:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason why it should be done like that; I'm not experienced creating articles, I just did it the way I've seen it done in other articles. Sorry it wasn't the way you wanted. I didn't revert cuz I don't agree with you, I reverted because you messed up the formatting, it delisted one of the categories and put the category text up with the body text. I didn't know what you were trying to do (maybe partly because of your completely non-descriptive edit summary), so I just reverted. Please don't assume that a) everyone knows as much as you, and b) we haven't done what you think we should do for some diabolical reason.--Anchoress 07:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that was my carelessness, messing up the formatting.  I really didn't think you were up to anything diabolical, I just think the phrase "what have you got against the alphabet?" is funny to use in an edit summary.  Sorry if I gave the wrong idea; I could have been clearer. -GTBacchus(talk) 07:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't funny at all. But apology accepted, and thanks for clarifying. Actually IIRC I went to another abortion-related article and just copied the categories, deleting the couple that didn't apply.--Anchoress 07:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes, that * is useful, like if you're putting the article Abortion into :Category:Abortion, it's good to use the star so it floats to the top of the list.  When entering people in categories, the best way to do it is like: Furedi, Ann - then she alphabetizes under F.  Sorry if I'm boring you, but once you know... you know. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that's cool. I like learning new stuff. Can't promise to remember (I hardly ever create articles), but I *will* remember where the instructions are, so I'll come back here and remind myself.--Anchoress 08:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111103093659/http://www.politics.co.uk/opinion-formers/british-pregnancy-advisory-service-bpas/our-services to http://www.politics.co.uk/opinion-formers/british-pregnancy-advisory-service-bpas/our-services
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928215738/http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436 to http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723024308/http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate to http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.calthorpe-clinic.co.uk/keynote_speech.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928215738/http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436 to http://www.bpas.org/bpasknowledge.php?year=2011&npage=0&page=81&news=436
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723024308/http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate to http://www.fpa.org.uk/campaignsandadvocacy/advocacyandlobbying/westminster/latest-activity/hfe-bill-debate
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified