Talk:Blepharoplasty

message: This was floating in the References section:
*“Blepharoplasty: Eyelids”. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2006. 25 September 2006.  --  Joie de Vivre 19:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrectly formatted ref

message: Maybe a less bloody or gory picture for more squeamish people?  Kind of a shocker when I got to this page clicking "random article."  I think a before/after picture would be more useful anyway.  Soave (talk) 04:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This falls under Wikipedia's policy on censorship. Nothing may be censored is the tl;dr. Timestep (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This argument is invalid. Should an article about pornography be full of that content? --2.245.192.157 (talk) 20:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Just out of curiosity, why is the censorship argument always brought up with reference to the placement of an image, rather than its outright inclusion on non-inclusion in the article?  If it were a question of inclusion outright, then yes, that is censorship.  But an argument about the placement of an image (or the use of a sylized graphic for the info-box image, and the "more disturbing" image below) is something that would be akin to a "guideline".  Wikipedia has guidelines for other things, why would this any different? Jimw338 (talk) 16:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Here, only in the Philippines: *gmanews.tv/video, Blepharoplasty, 05/31/2008 --Florentino floro (talk) 07:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Video

message: External Links added to Non Surgical Blepharoplasty - before and after pictures are necessary to see what this procedure does. The links on the page represent the only B+A galleries I could find. I think they're important to keep.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.160.182.197 (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Drawnedlac (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Clean up 

message: EDog95 seems to have a vendetta against placing links on wikipedia. I think people searching for information about blepharoplasty should have the option of finding before and after photos of patients who have had this surgery. If he can find better sites to link to he should go ahead. He should not be threatening people who have significantly improved the page with "vandalism".
I would appreciate if other people would chime in on this controversy. How can you understand plastic surgery without before and after photos? There are times when links are very useful on wikipedia pages.
Gadgetmaniac (talk) 02:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this to a new section. It does not warrant to be at the top of the Discussion page of this article. I also agree with your point. External links are useful to wikipedia pages and can be used as alternate sources. The pictures are also an aid to understand this process. Timestep (talk) 11:32, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Discussion 

message: I removed the section about costs as it contained dated information and was sourced to mostly non-notable, commercial websites not meeting WP:RS. Authoritative, encyclopedic information about cost and insurance coverage needs to be sourced per WP:RS or discussed here first. Flowanda | Talk 05:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. --BozMo talk 09:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost and insurance information-- June 2011 

message: Good lord, who wrote the "Recovery" section? It's the most bias thing I've ever read.
"it is common for those undergoing blepharoplasties to have significant complications"
"victims of this procedure"
"Surgeons seldom fully inform their patients"
"Patients are rarely informed of the psychological trauma that results"
"may leave patients with permanent disfigurement, resulting in significant depression and even suicidal ideation"
Someone has a serious vendetta or perhaps a non-surgical product to sell?
This chapter must be replaced. Such articles undermine the prestige of Wikipedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.182.252.40 (talk) 10:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recovery 

message: Not sure how relevant it is, but I was advised by surgeons not to have Blepharoplasty performed while I still smoked cigarettes, as the vasoconstriction caused by the nicotine slows and impairs healing.
Might be a worthwhile inclusion for those researching the topic, just not sure if/where it should go.
~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.205.51 (talk) 23:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smoking 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Blepharoplasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071006100432/http://www.bmc.edu/oto/grand/04_22_04.htm to http://www.bmc.edu/oto/grand/04_22_04.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120501134354/http://facs.org/fellows_info/bulletin/2012/grill0512.pdf to http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/bulletin/2012/grill0512.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: G 151.238.220.202 (talk) 10:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blepharoplasty