lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Spanish Civil War flying aces

message: :The author to this article hasn´t understood the Spanish surnaming system at all. Leopoldo Morquillas Rubio main surname -the father's surname-, for instance, is Morquillas. Therefore, there was no Republican fighter pilot called "Leopoldo Rubio" (and no Francoist flyers called Joaquín Morato,Ángel Larrazábal, etc.). When the main surmane is rather common (García, López, etc.), the mother's surname can be used together with the Father's surname: Ángel Salas Larrazábal, Manuel Vázquez Sagastizábal, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His correct surname was García-Morato (Joaquín García-Morato y Castaño).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 10:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is the Republican fighter pilot F. Tarazona (6 kills)? And J. Comas?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joaquín Morato 

message: The only source for corroborating Peck's 5 kills is Peck himself...
::"http://www.strategypage.com/cic/docs/cic401b.asp"
::"http://briem.com/files/BlackFlyersPA.pdf"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.33.77.93 (talk) 10:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  James L.H. Peck
Talk:List of Vietnam War flying aces

message: article is being repeatedly reverted by IP users, as the page under goes sources overhaul - FOX 52 (talk) 00:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Cannolis (talk) 02:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  request semi-protected
Talk:Unstrange Minds

message: Hi, there were some reviews of the book in some journals, those would be good sources - e.g.  , ,  (mediocre journal at the time), 
There were also some reviews in (at the time) solidly low quality journals - e.g.   - I'd say to probably not use these.
I will note though, a book review in a journal is not the same as a journal article. A claim made in a book review is not enough to support a medical claim on WP - for that, please see WP:MEDRS.
--Xurizuri (talk) 08:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for improving article
Talk:List of World War II aces from Germany

message: I have redlinked name of Hauptman Heinrich Junge (calling it Heinrich Junge (pilot)) because the existing link had connected him to a German mathematician old enough to be his father at least.Cloptonson (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Changed

message: Can someone please check that this person is ok for inclusion and if so add them? Thanks Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Peter Spoden]]
Talk:The Age of Kali

message: The Age of Kali is an overview of many of the most controversial stories and personalities discussed in Indian politics around the year 2000.  I put in summaries of the chapters because I think that this book would be a great reference for providing citations to other Wikipedia articles on the popular topics featured in this book.  Many other sources about controversies feature only one perspective; I believe that this book could shine as a source for multiple points of view in Wikipedia articles.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: This book as a reference

message: The Age of Kali or Kali Yuga. The term "yuga" means "Epoch", or "Age" in Sanskrit. According to classical Vedic writings, the ancient sages and thinkers of the Vedic Civilization viewed time as cyclical; no so much linear as we do in the West. One millennium is divided into four yugas or ages: Satya, Tetra, Dwarpara, and Kali. Hence, Kali Yuga is the last Age of this cycle. The influence of the Age of Kali brings about the worst in human beings. Up to that point, human beings are refined, caring, and concerned with the welfare of all. Once Kali Yuga starts, great disturbances take place in human society. The very first symptom is the "unnecessary killing of animals." Meat-eating becomes prominent, followed by intoxication, dishonesty, uncleanliness, bad habits, disrespect for and abuse of the weak (women and children included), illicit connection with women (of which sexual exploitation is the worst).--Egm108 (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Age of Kali
Talk:North Coast Journal

message: A newspaper stub that has only an intro will not necessarily have references. The bot issue that insists upon threatening deletion over this is ridiculous. I will keep the article as is until at such time someone adds to it. There is NO need whatsoever to "reference" or provide "citations" to a stub and a general intro of the article. Jeez.
:Norcalal 05:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, first, I am quite human thank you.  And secondly, a small alternative newspaper is not automagically notable.  You may want to read the notability guidelines, where you will find a detailed guide.  Please leave the tag there, which will bring attention to the article by editors who may then be able to source or reference the article.  — Coren (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article already existed as a stub. I redirected it to this new article reflecting the correct spelling of the paper. This is the major weekly paper for the far Northern Coastal Region of California. Its extensive stories, articles, and coverage is a record of the rich culture as well as a source of current affairs for the area. It is a newspaper and not an academic journal, by the way. This article, on a major weekly cultural paper is NONE of the following: Books, Fiction, Films, Music, Numbers, Organizations and companies, People, Pornographic actors, or Web content. The ABOVE is in relation to the article that the tag links to. If you have a tag for the relevance or lack of relevance of a local cultural paper, please add it. But stop tagging this ALREADY existing article for the above. The tag goes. Norcalal 05:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, the newspaper has a circulation of more than 20,000 and is the largest weekly on the Far North Coast of CA. Norcalal 05:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability ISSUE
Talk:The Sex Lives of Cannibals

message: Isn't it a bit odd that there isn't a single mention of sex in this whole article? Anonywiki (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a couple of years since I read the book, but my memory is that there wasn't much sex, if any, in it.  No cannibals, either.  Just an attention-getting title. Jordan Brown (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably an allusion to the Malinowski book. 78.0.144.92 (talk) 18:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't know that the connection is strong enough to put in the main article, but for those who are interested this comment refers to The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia. Jordan Brown (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex?
Talk:Berkeley Version

message: changes 14 January 2022
I have inspected the copies of the 1945 Berkeley NT, 1959 Berkeley Version, and Modern Language NT available on Archive.org and compared against my copy of the New Berkeley Version (which does not contain full copyright information, which is why I was looking - to confirm whether it was the revised 1969 version or the original 1959 version).
The 1959 version does not include "New" in the title - this was clearly added for the 1969 version, as suggested elsewhere on the internet.  It is also suggested that this was renamed as the Modern Language Bible in 1971, however I suspect it may have been published simultaneously under both names.  Two prefaces are provided at bibleversion.org, but some typos have been made in copying them out, so I don't know what to trust about them.
Contrary to a previous statement here, I can confirm that the New Berkeley Version revised both the old and new testaments (the new testament revision is described at http://mirrors.unna.org/homepage.mac.com/rmansfield/thislamp/files/20070521_modern_language_bible.html as more extensive).  Gen 1:2 in the New Berkeley Version begins "The earth was formless and empty" - c.f. the original "the earth was unformed and chaotic".  But at first glance it does seem that the main change is significantly more footnotes.
For more information on these translations refer to http://mirrors.unna.org/homepage.mac.com/rmansfield/thislamp/files/20070521_modern_language_bible.html and http://www.bible-researcher.com/berkeley.html
101.98.247.26 (talk) 08:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Martha McSally

message: "She opposes same-sex marriage and abortion in "nearly all cases", saying both issues should be decided at the state level."
This appears to say that because she believes these issues ought to be decided at the state level, therefore she opposes same sex marriage and abortion.
However, whether an issue should be decided by the local, state, or federal government is a separate question than whether one supports or opposes a particular issue or practice in principle. For example, one can support or oppose abortion, but believe that it is a not a federal or Constitutional question (as the United States Supreme Court recently held in overturning Roe v. Wade); or one can support same-sex marriage but believe marriage law should be governed by the states (as it was throughout American history until the Obergefell decision in 2015).
It may be the case that she opposes both, supports both, or opposes one and supports the other. But these are separate questions from the question of jurisdiction (which level of government ought to have authority to decide these questions). 
This should be clarified in my opinion. Tpkatsa (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support or Opposition not the same as Jurisdiction of an Issue
Talk:Mary Feik

message: I'm not sure if she is a CAP Member or not. If someone finds out, please add this article to :Category:People of the Civil Air Patrol. Mjf3719 (talk) 14:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil Air Patrol Member? 

message: The Colonel Mary S. Feik Composite Squadron of the Civil Air Patrol advises that Col. Feik passed on 6-10-2016, see notice here. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 12:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Death
Talk:Kristján Jóhannsson

message: I have re-written this article. Even if the article's creator is the web master of Mr. Johannsson's official site, they cannot simply copy and paste the material into Wikipedia. They need to verify who actually owns the copyright and that they are releasing it into the public domain. (See  for guidance on how to do this. If not, it will be summarily removed.  
However, such material is invariably unsuitable for a Wikipedia biography article, even with the copyright holder's permission unless it is re-written to conform to Wikipedia style Guidelines  and to ensure that it has a neutral point of view, and no conflict of interest. 
Most importantly, such material from an official web site (or management site) must be backed up by additional  verifiable and reliable independent sources. (See  for more). I know that Mr. Johannsson has had a substantial career, and have seen him perform at Covent Garden myself, which is why I took the trouble to edit this article (otherwise it would have been a candidate for deletion or even speedy deletion), but it still needs more independent, reliable sources.
All the Best, Voceditenore 08:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this article was re-written
Talk:Charles Simmons (politician)

message: Not sure if this is the same as Charles James Simmons who was a MP from Brierley Hill (UK Parliament constituency) in 1950.  Anyone who knows, please add that and also note it at Talk:Brierley Hill (UK Parliament constituency).--Doug.(talk • contribs) 05:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he was, but he was not the Olympic athlete. Sam Blacketer 06:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moffatt, New Translation

message: The previous version contained statements on the use of this translation by C.S.Lewis and MLK which misrepresented usage as praise. I have edited the paragraph to accurately reflect how this work was used by these authors, and I updated the reference for Strength to Love to the version I have on hand. Neither Lewis nor King 'praised' the translation in the given references, nor is there any evidence that they 'frequently used' this translation in the references given. If these claims should re-appear I expect they will have references which demonstrate these claims. 
BrandenburgHorse (talk) 14:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to C.S. Lewis and Martin Luther King Jr.
Talk:Max Stotz

message: Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions or non-RS such as Franz Kurowski. 
A recent MilHist RfC, which aimed to modify SOLDIER to cover those with ace status, concluded w/o arriving at a consensus that flying aces should be presumed to be notable. Here's the RfC in question: RfC on notability of flying aces.
A de.wiki article exists but is equally not convincing for notability. Successful completion of missions is not part of SOLDIER. Please also see a note at  MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. 
K.e.coffman (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 189 kills. Two [[aviation regiment]s - definitely meets SOLDIER(4). Large amount of book references.Icewhiz (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Stanley (name)

message: As of this month, this article was proposed to merge with with Stanley (name). As a Stanley myself, I second the motion this motion. There's no sense splitting it up. Joeystanley (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies for not starting a discussion. I took some time to try to fix these articles, and noticed that it's quite silly to have two distinct articles when both are inherently related. As a fellow Stan (from Stanley), I had hoped an administrator could properly conduct such a merger. Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Se Wsi Testamenti

message: This page says that "se" as a definite article never caught on in Finnish, but in my dialect and many others "se" is used as a definite article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.100.33 (talk) 07:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I was just wondering the same; I don't speak Finnish natively, but I've definitely seen this phenomenon often, and it was confusing at first because it's not usually mentioned to learners of Finnish. It's also not mentioned in Colloquial Finnish (but one example sentence there has se ovi in what seems to be an example of this phenomenon, apparently not conscious because it's also used in the "literary Finnish" version of the example), only in Wiktionary. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 07:17, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Se as definite article 

message: I thought the reason as to why he wrote "uo" as "oo" was because at the time, southwestern Finnish dialects (incl. Turku area) didn't have the "uo" diphthong until later? Kapulakone (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "uo" as "oo"?
Talk:The Postal Dude

message: I started the page, because I believe that Postal Dude, is a fairly established character, having been the main character in the muliple installments of the Postal series, and in the upcoming film.
 However, I do believe strongly that the article isn't nearly as good as it could be, and I also did not do the greatest job at citing references.
If anyone can improve the article it would be greatly appreciated, seeing as Dude is deserving of an article as opposed to just being footnotes. Thank You
Chicken picata 05:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Page
Talk:Bible of St Louis

message: The bible described in this article as the St. Louis Bible has nothing to do with the book described as the Morgan Bible. The only thing that these two completely different works share is a reference in their name to King Louis. Merging tha articles makes no sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-Pierre Remy (talk • contribs) 08:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Morgan Bible]]
Talk:Young's Analytical Concordance to the Bible

message: The wording in the last paragraph doesn't read like an encyclopedia article.
:"If you wonder why this book is not widely available in most Bible Study Software packages, it is simply because most software search engines duplicate this work by way of their built-in ability to search on a Greek or Hebrew word by a click on the tagged English word. If you don't have a program like this, however, Young's is one of the most useful concordances for doing word studies."
It needs either rewriting or removing. DFH (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added the WP tone template. DFH (talk) 12:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone issue
Talk:Natalya Meklin

message: ===Photos by Ivan Shagin (1904 – 1982)===
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/71889/ and https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/72021/ which show Meklin, Nadezhda Popova, and Yevdokiya Nikulina
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/72166/ Rufina Gasheva and Meklin
===Photos by Arkady Shaikhet (1898 – 1959)===
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/81165/
===Photos by Yevgeny Khaldei (1917 – 1997)===
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/181556/ Meklin (then Kravtsova) and her son
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/181533/ Meklin in the 2nd half of the 20th century
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/181493/ Meklin in an aeroplane
Hope this helps with copyright calculators. Remember, Soviet World War II photos by known authors are protected by copyright for 74 years after the death of the author, not 70 AND have to be published 95 years ago or more per the URAA.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted photos of Meklin 

message: * https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/181556/ Meklin (then Kravtsova) and her son
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/181533/ Meklin in the 2nd half of the 20th century
* https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/181493/ Meklin in an aeroplane
Hope this helps with copyright calculators. Remember, Soviet World War II photos by known authors are protected by copyright for 74 years after the death of the author, not 70 AND have to be published 95 years ago or more per the URAA.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos by Yevgeny Khaldei (1917 – 1997)
Talk:National Aviation Day

message: Why is "Begins" used in the Infobox for the first National Aviation Day date?
Grammatically and structurally, a "begins" implies, infers, & means that there is an "ends."  And there can't be an "ends" for an "annual" recognition date.
The proper term to replace "Begins" in the Infobox should either be "Proclaimed" or "First".
What do the rest of you think? 2600:8800:785:1300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Begins" ?
Talk:Liaquat–Nehru Pact

message: This article appears to be a summary of the Liaquat Nehru Pact article herebut provides no reference. Zbobet2012 06:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.storyofpakistan.com/articletext.asp?artid=A096. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Misarxist 16:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hi. The map shows India and Pakistan, but also Bangladesh. At the signing of the treaty, Bangladesh did not exist, it was still part of Pakistan (East Pakistan). 135.196.94.75 (talk) 08:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced the map per your concern. -- SMS Talk 08:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Map
Talk:How Students Learn

message: It appears that this book may in fact be... several books. I see the following in the National Academies Press site:
* "How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom (2005)" (https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10126/how-students-learn-history-mathematics-and-science-in-the-classroom)
* "How Students Learn: History in the Classroom (2005)" (https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11100/how-students-learn-history-in-the-classroom)
* "How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom (2005)" (https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11102/how-students-learn-science-in-the-classroom)
They all have 2005 dates, but maybe the second two were pulled out from the original? not sure.
Clements (talk) 01:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Category talk:Civilian nuclear power accidents

message: We have a List of civilian nuclear accidents and now a category of articles relating to Civilian nuclear power accidents. The category needs to be changed to something like "Civilain nuclear power" to encompass all civilian nuclear power articles. Also, the category needs to develop some criteria for inclusion. Right now it has an entry for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station. That plant had a significant problem that could have caused an accident but no accident actually occurred, so why is it in a category of "civilain nuclear power accidents"? Nailedtooth 06:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On further examination, this category seems to be particularly useless. Most of these articles would be more appropriate in other categories or even in the Nuclear Power category itself. I propose deleting this category and placing the entries into other categories. Nailedtooth 17:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplucate?
Talk:The International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method

message: I started a fuller listing of the books in this series, but never completed it - it's at User:Dsp13/drafts/The International Library of Psychology, Philosophy and Scientific Method - if it's of any use to improve this page, please use it! Dsp13 (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fuller listing?
Talk:IBM 3590

message: 1. The 3590 is later identified as a "drive".  Is it a format, as in the sentence above, or is it a drive?  If it is both a format and a drive, some additional words are needed to make that explicit.
2. "family is a series" is hard to parse.  Is it a family? a series? a family OF series??
tooold 06:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Kubanczyk 15:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The IBM 3590 family is a series of magnetic tape data storage formats 

message: There needs to be a section that explains the difference between a model with an ACF and without an ACF  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.18.253.43 (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  X1A vs. X11?