Talk:OSI model

message: You would think Open Systems Interconnection would be about the organization but, no, it covers the same topic as OSI model. A merge appears to be in order. ~Kvng (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Open Systems Interconnection]] 

message: I am not happy with the insertion of a mention of and link to Protocol Wars. Per my comments on the newly created page, I think the page is misnamed, and I am not yet convinced it is a notable subject in its own right. Why not have it as a sub section here, and isn't the lack of a subsection here an indication that editors have not seen it as notable? 
I am happy to allow that page to develop without taking it to AfD or any other such issues, but until it is clear it is notable and stable (note that I think the page is misnamed for instance) I don't think we should link to it. I am happy to be over-ruled by other editors, and if none come forward, I would be content for you to request a WP:3O but at this point the challenged material should remain out of the article per WP:BRD. Thanks. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion continues at Talk:Protocol Wars#Notability ~Kvng (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protocol Wars 

message: I've reverted the merge from :Open systems architecture into a top importance article as controversial and needs discussion in my opinion.Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Open systems architecture]] merge 

message: In the text box "OSI model by layer", the SPDY protocol is mentioned as an example for a session layer protocol. However, SPDY does also compress HTTP requests. Compression belongs to the presentation layer (layer 6) in the OSI model. This is however not explained in the text below. It should be made clear that it is not always possible to clearly relate an existing protocol to a single dedicated OSI layer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobias.hossfeld (talk • contribs) 19:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPDY protocol as example for Session Layer  

message: This text "It was published in 1984 by both the ISO, as standard ISO 7498..." has a link on the "ISO 7498" term that redirects back to this page.
A bit navel-gazingly redundant, eh?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.153.83 (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not any more, it doesn't.  It also doesn't have a link to X.200, as that also just redirects here. Guy Harris (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular reference? 

message: first (maybe second) sentence mentions ISO, but without describing the acronym. It would be helpful to have it described 50.92.161.150 (talk) 20:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO Definition 

message: DNS is resolved in Layer 7 (Application) but Layer 5 (Session) sections second sentence claims this is where it is done. It is not mentioned in the Layer 7 (Application) description. However in the main article for Layer 7 (Application) DNS is referenced as being part of that layer, correctly. As well as in the main article for Layer 5 (Session) DNS is correctly not mentioned. 103.91.192.50 (talk) 03:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Some WP:OR going on there, apparently – corrected, thanks! --Zac67 (talk) 05:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layer 5 (Session) Claims DNS incorrectly