Talk:Pinus sylvestris

message: Hi; Scots pine is sometimes referred to as pinus sylvatica rather than sylvestris.  Can anyone clarify the difference?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.114.34 (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The P. sylvestris is also found in the Great Lakes area in North America. You can see a range map of this in Trees and Nonflowering Plants Reader's Digest (isbn: 0-7621-0037-0). -- IvanTortuga (talk) 06:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But does this ref. claim that it is part of its native range? I grow lots of exotic plants in my garden, some of them seed themselves, but this does not make my part of the world part of their range. Imc (talk) 07:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Scots    140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: Why is the Scots Pine called the Scots Pine? Is it named randomly? Or was it because Scotland was first place it was seen? (I think that is MUCH more realistic). If it became extinct extinct from Scotland then that be really wierd. 78.151.47.177 (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Though the English would, of course, have said "Scotch Pine". Kim Traynor | Talk 12:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In the U.S., they're known as "Scotch pine." Sca (talk) 15:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

text: Scotch pine is the correct name in Canada too. 99.238.167.214 (talk) 05:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Whitebark Pine which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 03:29, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Reading through the article, especially Scots pine#Cultivation and uses, I see that Scots pine is quite widespread throughout the world and commonly used for its wood and as a Christmas tree. Per WP:FLORA, I think that the article's title should be its common name. If other editors disagree, and wish to rename the article, I would suggest going through the process at WP:RM, and notifying the editors who participated in the discussion at Talk:Pinus albicaulis#Requested move to scientific name —hike395 (talk) 02:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Keeping article at its common name

message: I was recently looking at two Scots pines, one of which had seed cones but did not appear to have pollen cones. The other had only pollen cones. This would seem to indicate that the trees were male and female. This isn't mentioned in this article. Is it generally the case or do both types of cone appear on a single tree? 
Amandajm (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I had a quick look at the 3 sources that list Scots Pine as an invasive species. the first 2 didn't load, but the last one did. However, the last one didn't actually include Scots Pine on the list of invasive species. So far there is no evidence a Wikipedia user can access to verify that this tree is an invasive species. I have a paper due in a few hours so I can't afford to spend time finding more sources, but somebody should either look or delete the line about it being an invasive species.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by English cheese man (talk • contribs) 04:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invasive species ¬_¬? 

message: Can someone maybe report this at mw:Extension talk:Media Viewer/About? I can't, for some reason.
The image description of the species distribution contains a numbered legend, but the numbers aren't shown when you click on the image, which makes it very confusing. It took me a while to figure out what E meant for example.
It would have been much better if the items in a list in an image description would be prefixed with ① ② ③ and so on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 15:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The legend in the taxonbox is set by . The information on the image at Commons is just to describe the image there and is not automatically used with the image. You can change the image caption by adding something like in . —  Jts1882 | talk  16:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the range_map_caption parameter sets the range map caption in the infobox, which I'm not talking about. I believe I was perfectly clear on this, so I'll quote myself: ‘when you click on the image’. There would be no point in showing the legend in the infobox, since the features that require a legend are too small to make out unless you click on the image. When you do, the range map caption is no longer visible and the text that is displayed is taken from the image description. However, as I said the numbers in the list are stripped, which is very confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug report: numbers missing in legend