lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Implied repeal

message: I added this more recent case. If I misunderstood the development of the law, please correct me by editing directly. – Kaihsu (talk) 20:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The other justices did agree with Lord Hope. – Kaihsu (talk) 17:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BH v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) 

message: I made these, but omitted to sign them.Mr Tangle (talk) 07:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  26 October 2014 edits
Talk:Vodafone Mobile Connect USB Modem

message: This is an advert - not an encyclopedia entry - its not a Vodophone thing at all. Other companies like Three do exactly the same thing even with exactly the same modem.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.252.240.55 (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Can one connect the USB modem to a WiFi or ethernet router? --Nukeless 20:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Router
Template talk:Energy in the United States

message: The template was pretty oil/gas and renewable focused. I made some minor tweaks to provide a broader context
* Spun off governmental agencies from "organizations" and added electricity oriented ones
* Added a few more trade associations to the organizational list
* Added Federal Power Act to policy.
* Removed Obama's SOTU from template. I just don't see it as a defining speech for energy policy, and the article itself is pretty short on details.
Madrone (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Lux Prize

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Lux Prize →  – Official title seems to be capitalised as per website. This may just be an uncontested technical move (leaving a redirect from the upper/lower version, but I'm adding this here in case there's a reason I don't know about. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 October 2020
Talk:Permanganate

message: It goes from purple to brown. Mbslrm (talk) 03:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxidation positive result 

message: Hehe, who wrote that, that's brilliant :P telewatho (talk) 15:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not to be confused with pomegranate" :-D 

message: This page is getting vandalized by non-registered people. 195.195.239.152, on 19 September 2012 changed the correct equation 2 MnCl2 + 5 NaClO + 6 NaOH → 2 NaMnO4 + 9 NaCl+ 3 H2O into 2 MnCl2 + 4 NaClO + 2 NaOH → 2 NaMnO2 + 6 NaCl+ 3 H2O and it went unnoticed. Vmelkon (talk) 22:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: According to the french version of this page:
Le permanganate en solution aqueuse oxyde l'eau en dioxygène. Bien que cette réaction soit très lente, elle peut changer le titre de la solution.
Here is a proposed translation:
Aqueous permanganate oxidizes water to form oxygen. Although this reaction is very slow, it has an impact on the solution titration.
While the english version claims that water oxidation doesn't happen:
According to theory, permanganate is strong enough to oxidize water, but this doesn't actually happen to any extent. 
Miloud90 (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to T. Rees, J. Chem. Educ. 1987 64, 1058, this reaction is catalysed by MnO2, and will slowly change the concentration of permanganate present. Whether the loss of permanganate is a significant issue in any given situation depends on the age of the solution, the concentration of impurities that generate MnO2, and the accuracy required. --Ben (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting claims in french and english versions 

message: I'd like to see more history in these articles. For instance, I gather they wouldn't have had manganese violet 2,000 years ago, but what about other manganese-based pigments and chemistry (presumably as a by-product of iron chemistry)? Vince Calegon 18:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Currently the article describes permanganate as being used as a disinfectant, in a weird mix of uncertainty ("used regularly to sanitize baths ... or anything general like that") and absolute certainty ("[i]t is a cheap and extremely effective compound for the task"). I'm not actually sure that belongs on this page, since all I can seem to find reference to online is potassium permanganate being used as a disinfectant, rather than permanganates in general or permanganate ions on their own.
I don't know enough about disinfectants to know if this section should just be removed or if it could be expanded on. Rydwolf (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as a disinfectant
Talk:Urea nitrate

message: Urea nitrate (H2N-CO-NH3+ . NO3—) is a simple salt of protonated urea. The reaction between urea and nitric acid is therefore neutralisation, or protonation. By nitration of urea, nitrourea (H2N-CO-NH-NO2) is formed, which is a different compound. If nobody has objections, I will change the article formulation in the following days.--84.163.109.33 (talk) 01:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urea nitrate isn't produced by nitration. 

message: LOL: Caltech - at least at one time - had a long tradition of amateur explosive enthusiasm.
One such enthusiast used to blow two-inch holes through the engine block of an abandoned truck he found in the Mojave Desert.  He used the inwardly-curved bottoms of champagne bottles as shaped charges, with the bottles themselves being filled with Ammonium Nitrate fitted with blasting caps that were prepared in their Student House rooms.
However, also in his room he made some Urea Nitrate but was able to detonate only a very small portion of it with one of those same dorm room blasting caps.
Being more of an armchair enthusiast myself, not much contemplation was required for me to come up with ways to achieve reliable detonation, but I'll leave those actual ways as exercises for the Gentle Homeland Security Agent.
Have A Nice Day! 70.102.74.164 (talk) 12:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  UN is a lot more difficult to detonate than ANFO
Talk:Bird's Marsh

message: Proposal...
This is a great article but without a load of history etc it isn't really going to get any better. Perhaps it should be merged with Chippenham, Wiltshire?84.92.120.61 19:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two major problems with this article as it stands: The first is that of Notability, which is neither asserted nor established in the article. I lived in Chippenham 1989 - 2005 and I've never heard of it. The second problem is that the article is completely Unsourced. If it's going to be merged into Chippenham it will need some sources. I'm going to put this on my watchlist but if it's neither sourced nor merged in a reasonable time I will either merge it myself (depending on other commitments) or Propose its deletion. It hasn't been edited since its creation date, which makes me think its original author isn't that bothered about it.  --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 02:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Operation Epsom

message: : Having both "Hart 2007, p. 108." and "Hart 2007a, p. 108." looks like an error. You may want to double check. User-duck (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's it, thanks for putting Hart 2007b into further reading. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hart 2007 and 2007a 

message: Failure and "failure" are not the same; "failure" means that the editor is not endorsing the word....Regards Keith-264 (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Pseudopfiesteria shumwayae

message: Can anyone constrain the original author's assertion the P.shumwayae was "recently" discovered in the body of water in question? I recall discussions in the 1990s about the presence of this species in North Carolina. It makes sense to attach the remark to a specific date or to strike the time reference altogether. More generally, the assertions in this article are need to be properly cited. DDavis, 20071026, 21:04 UTC
:From the reading I've done, it appears it was first discovered and characterized in NC, but it is found around the entire US east coast up to Long Island, NY, and in New Zealand and Australia, suggesting a world-wide distribution. - tameeria (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:United States v. Louisiana (1965)

message: This page was marked for deletion by User:Martijn Hoekstra. I removed the PROD notice because the article is notable as a case decided by the United States Supreme Court which defined the State of Louisiana's rights to the lands, minerals and other natural resources underlying the Gulf of Mexico. I don't know much more about the case than what I briefly scanned on its findlaw site, but I would assume it would be relevant to the geographic history of the State of Louisiana and therefore notable for that reason as well. If anyone from Louisiana has an opinion about this, I would encourage them to weigh in soon before someone tries to delete the article. 
I would also like to note, that until I created the disambiguation page for United States v. Louisiana, the case with this name from the same year (though with a different argue date) was noted as "one of most wanted pages on WP:WANTED". I'm not sure which case article was wanted the most (the other case with this argue date is Louisiana v. United States (1965) which I gave its own page), but I assume every single case that was important enough to reach the United States Supreme court is noteworthy. --Cdogsimmons 20:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion
Talk:USS Perry (1843)

message: Oliver Hazard Perry? --81.149.74.231 (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this named after... 

message: I've never read about a warship which was commissioned and decommissioned so many times. Was frequent  Ship_commissioning more common in mid-19th Century America than it was in other times and places?  Terry Thorgaard (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  multiple commissioning and decommissioning
Talk:HMCS Canada

message: According to the TV program "The Sea Hunters", CGS Canada was a reduced size design derived from the Royal Navy light cruisers of the day. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: light cruiser

message: The "Queen of Nassau" section says she was renamed MV Queen of Nassau (around 1924). I've flagged this as dubious, because the Infobox and Description section both say she was powered by a triple expansion steam engine. So wouldn’t that make her a steamship, rather than a motor vessel? Was she re-engined at some point? Does anybody know? Xyl 54 (talk) 23:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: the reference cited makes no mention of any such conversion but it seems pedantic to tag the name change as dubious because of a mistake in the prefix. I've therefore removed the prefix and the tag. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Wind power in Ohio

message: Hi Anphibian, and thank you for another useful template.  But I really think it needs to be put at the end of the article.  To have it in the "See also" section interrupts the flow of the article. Johnfos 20:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have moved template now... Johnfos 00:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template needs to be moved

message: A reference with which to update the article:
* 
--Teratornis (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 wind power project construction 

message: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-05/iberdrola-completes-304-megawatt-blue-creek-wind-park-in-u-s-.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthurricane (talk • contribs) 20:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: blue creek is finished

message: Hi all! I'm thinking this page should contain the various utility-scale, distributed-generation wind projects installed by Findlay Ohio's One Energy. A few manufacturing facilities in Ohio (including Whirlpool, Ball Corporation, and Valfilm) have 1-3 wind turbines on-site to reduce their consumption from the grid. I'm working on creating a Company page for One Energy, as I'm a writer on staff. Maybe I'll work on adding the language to this page once the company page is live, but I just thought I'd throw the suggestion out there to see if anyone has any thoughts. Thanks! Eileen at OE (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Energy Ohio Wind for Industry projects
Talk:Portland Public Market

message: The article used to say, before this edit, it dated back to 1870.  Is that not true?  —EncMstr (talk) 19:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like 1933 may have been when the waterfront building was built and 1870 might have been when the public market first started.  Jason McHuff (talk) 15:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History to 1870
Talk:Maime Locke

message: There are Virginia State Senators that or on Wikipedia. Why should she bdenied the privelage
Hi This should definitly be merged with Mamie Locke, That is her real name  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12eward (talk • contribs) 20:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge done.--Kubigula (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:USS Alamosa

message: I saw the photo on the Type_C1_ship article and applied it here (with the assumption that it is correctly labeled to begin with). I am mystified by the dramatic and very obtrusive paintjob, though. If anyone knows why it may have been dressed up this way, it would be a useful addition to the page, given that this is the photo we have for it. I'd be very curious to hear it, too. Hammerquill (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure, but likely one of the specific measures of Ship camouflage. Group29 (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo
Template talk:Contributions licensed under the GNU GPL version 2

message: I think we need more GNU GPL licensing options.
*I wanted to use “GNU GPL version 3 or later”, so I’ve substed the template and edited it.
*Others may want to use “version 2 or later”.
*Ten years from now there may be version 4.
*If most software becomes version 3, 4, 5, … , how free will this multi‐license be?
--AVRS 20:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  License version
Talk:Abu al-Abbas al-Mursi Mosque

message: Why was the title name changed from El-Mursi Abul Abbas Mosque? This is how the mosque is called in Egypt. Egyegy 20:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/abbasmursimosque.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AxelBoldt (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Non surgical nose job

message: Why do people keep removing the bolding of the title?  The bolding is something Larry Sanger started back when he was editor-in-chief and it's still standard.  There's a page somewhere of instructions on it in a help page I saw somewhere. William Ortiz 20:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do people keep removing the bolding of the title? 

message: Some material at Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2006-11-09#Non-Surgical_Nose_Job however it says it's written wrong like an ad but it has some links that may be good. William Ortiz 20:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some material
Talk:Monoblock LNB

message: To avoid confusion, I intend to move Monoblock to Monoblock LNB and change Monoblock to a disambig page. Biscuittin 21:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I do not find any need for adding Online Shop listing, as reference to the current state of equipment.
It is contemporary technical article, not some humanistic history. 
Neither do I find a need to mention name of contemporary brands making this stuff.
I will just point it out for notability sake
such shopping listing are generated not just one shop, and not just in one language.
It can be planty shop listings.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Online Shop Listings
Talk:Med Spa

message: The Med Spa page is essentially the same as the Medical spa page, both of which are mostly unsourced with significant POV material.  This page was created by user name "Sleekmedspa" and is the only wiki contribution by this user.  The user name indicates this article may have been created with a COI.
Because it duplicates the Medical spa page, does not offer any new sourced information and may have a COI issue, I am merging it with the Medical spa page, which has similar issues. OccamzRazor 21:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Med Spa
Talk:Bo Yikao

message: I know that the Cambridge History  in its one mention  used "Boyi Kao", but this seems to be an example of Homer nodding. Wiki and wiki clones have made that more common on general Google, but on the legitimate source side, 8 to Cambridge, the use is actually "Bo Yikao" or just "Yikao". More importantly, this is the version used by the Book of Ritual (Tan Gong I)  his (posthumous) name is certainly Yikao (and Bo his title); he is not Kao ("revered dead") with his title "Boyi". — LlywelynII 04:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That said, kao does seem to just be a posthumous term of respect. If there're any articles about its meaning or sources about his original personal name, it'd be great to add them.  — LlywelynII 04:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bo" is almost always treated as part of his name, so Bo Yikao would be a better title. -Zanhe (talk) 15:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bo Yikao or Yikao, but not Boyi Kao
Talk:Cabretta

message: The consensus of Wikipedia albums is that album articles should include technical as well as performer personnel. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Assessment. "B" status, the highest the project may give, includes "A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but it seems strange when you see this info so rarely. And what is the point of listing the cover artist, for example? Griot (talk) 18:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is that consensus on Wikipedia album articles is to include all personnel, including technical. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment#Quality_scale, to be specific. This information is sourced, and its removal does not seem constructive. The photographer and the engineer lent their talents to this production just as surely as the bassist did. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel

message: Singles from this LP were: "Spanish Stroll" b/w "Mixed Up Shook Up Girl" (Capitol 4461), "Little Girl" b/w "Cadillac Walk" (Capitol 4510), and "Just Your Friends" (from Magenta) b/w "One Way Street" (UK Capitol 5989). ([http://www.spectropop.com/JackNitzsche/discography.htm Nitzsche discography) Griot (talk) 18:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, but the cover artist? Also, no other DeVille album has this info, and I rarely see it on most album articles. I don't even know if it's accurate. I have this album and I don't see this info on it. Griot (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you meant this for the personnel section. :) It's in the source. The album articles that are lacking such information are incomplete. It would probably be better to add it those rather than remove it from this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles
Talk:Dealul Mitropoliei

message: It would probably be worth adding something about the role of the site in the annual celebration of Easter in Bucharest, especially the way the flame is carried out into the city. I don't have anything citable on that, but I've been there, and it's a pretty impressive ceremony. - Jmabel | Talk 20:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easter 

message: I think it would be good to give a little more sense of where the hill is relative to the city: it must have been only a ten or fifteen minute stroll from the Curtea Veche when that was the seat of government, and, of course, today it is an even shorter stroll from Piaţa Unirii. Do we really need anything more than a map to cite for that? - Jmabel | Talk 20:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that I think of it, though, was there a convenient bridge across the Dâmboviţa there in those days? - Jmabel | Talk 19:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here is an extra bit of history that may help.  And here is something even more detailed.  Turgidson 19:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to the surrounding city
Talk:Harold E. Martin

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem