lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Larger Bowl (A Pantoum)

message: There is already a link provided in the article for what a pantoum is. It is unnecessary to include the lyrics to the entire song to provide an example. If anything, one stanza should be properly quoted using {{cquote|. When an article is classified as a stub it invites users to broaden and expand the information ABOUT the song - how it materialized in the brain of Mr. Peart, what was the inspiration, has it influenced other lyricists, the meaning of the song in general as stated by the author (if it can be supported by secondary sources). I am going to revert the inclusion of lyrics for now. Wisdom89 16:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just curious - is this a general policy of not including lyrics?  Not a big deal I guess, but it just seems strange - if there's one thing about a song that someone might want to find out by looking it up in Wikipedia, it seems to me it would be the lyrics.  I would expect all song articles to have complete lyrics for the subject song.  Yes, I know, there are plenty of "lyric database" sites out there, but if you've ever visited them, you know they are filled with irritating ads and popups and anyway who knows if they're accurate?  I'd certainly rather get my info about lyrics here, where at least the content is "peer reviewed"!  Branchc (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, sorry, I see now the referenced guideline at WP:NOT#LYRICS.  Still seems unfortunate to me, but I understand. Branchc (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Including lyrics
Talk:Don Ross (bodybuilder)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. - Yamara 18:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: When it says Don Ross used the name Ripper Savage is this the Ripper Savage that wrestled for the California Championship Wrestling promotion in the 1980s?  2600:1700:4260:35D0:2C5D:CF85:EB50:51C5 (talk) 05:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripper Savage
Talk:Spiderman 4

message: This is now a double redirect. It should be retargeted to Spider-Man film series. Thanks – Gurch 18:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double redirect 

message: I am one of the main contributors to this "edit war". I think that this page should be there as the movie has been confirmed. The page may not have a lot of information, but it has enough for a page.
So stop changing it back to that redirect page, okay? --Red Slayer 18:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the freakin WP:NFF, which requires (in most cases) production to start before creating articles about those film. Gman124 talk 18:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response to Edit War
Talk:Belinda Bidwell

message: Is the date 22 April 1936 correct? She die when she was 72 years old.
* 2007-04-22 - 1936-04-22 = 71,247 years and not 72!.
What ist the source of 1936? --Atamari 19:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Date
Talk:Colorectal surgery

message: The article says, "more commonly called colorectal surgeons."  By whom?  In the medical field?  For your average person, this seems unlikely.  I can't think of a single time I've ever heard "I'm on my way to see my colorectal surgeon." Without context and citation, I think this "more commonly called" phrase is useless. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 11:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: colorectal surgeons term

message: trying to remove it is difficult okay I'm new here and it's not appropriate so thank you to whoever helps me JohnBalliver (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  the mess of a f****** Seinfeld reference
Talk:Thein Sein

message: Does anyone know which name is his family name? Therequiembellishere 19:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family name 

message: This article is too brief considering the significance of the subject matter. I am not an expert in this area but will be conducting some research. Any help will be appreciated. Silverwood (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion request

message: Some sources   says he resigns as chairman of USDP on May 2013, but local source  says he was resigned on October 2012 but only announced on May 2013. This source  says he was re-elected as party chairman in October 2012 and resigns on May 2013. This source  says Shwe Mann had taken over the chairman’s post on May 2013 though he had been filling the administrative duties of the role since October 2012. So, Which date should be added to the article? --Phyo WP (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resignation of USDP chairman 

message: If there is no objection, I would like to revert edition  by User:陳評德,  categorised as "Burmese people of Chinese descent" which is not WP:VERIFY. Phyo WP (talk) 08:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Burmese people of Chinese descent
Talk:Bedford Senior High School

message: I redirected Bedford Senior High School to the Bedford Public Schools (Michigan) article.  The BSHS article contained almost no useful information, and most of the information was in the form of pointless sports statistics and unencyclopedic trivia.  There is nothing of notability to warrants its own article at this time.  I did move the WMLZ-LP information to the BPS article too.—№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė♫♪ 15:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Power user

message: I think everyone is right in some way, but power user is more of a new term that isn't that well defined.  It could mean different things, as someone said below.  This article seems to focus on the networking aspect.  To me a power user is just someone who uses the more demanding functions/resources of a computer.  A power user actually has the computer use more of its RAM and processing power, therefore the term "power" user.. the average user or layman uses the more basic functions.  It's not a derogatory thing to be an average user, but a power user pushes the computer's resources a little more.  Not to the extent of a graphic designer or a gamer, but these categories could overlap too.
After a casual reading of this article, it seems to me to be skirting on violation the NPOV policy and in any case needs improving.  First, it strikes me as being condescending towards non-"Power Users."  The advanced features and tasks that are performed by power users are never detailed or explained, they're just some magical skills that normal people don't have.
:actually, i consider it a derogatory term - ime a power user is someone with a big ego because they know some keyboard shortcuts and how to read dialog boxes
Second, maybe I'm just reading too much into the article, but it seems to have a strong pro-Windows bias.  No concrete definition for what a Power User is is ever explained in the article, but even if it were, it should clarify what a Power User is on each major type of OS--Windows, OS X, Linux, etc.
Third, the definition itself.  What actually makes a Power User a Power User?  Is it because I use tabs, themes, and keyboard shortcuts on Firefox in OS X?  Is it because I installed some software for Outlook?  Is it because I use deliberately outdated hardware to painfully and slowly complete complicated computations?  As far as I am aware, there's no real consensus on what a Power User is.  A Power User could be someone who uses a browser other than Internet Explorer to check their webmail, or it could be someone who programs from the command line in OpenBSD.
:no that'd be a programmer or developer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 21:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, exactly. A power user is someone who is "good with computers" but doesn't actually do anything specific -- a programmer programs, a developer develops, etc. etc.. It seems to vaguely describe just about every child in the First World above the age of 8. --86.146.103.87 (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

text: probably but that's power users for you. it's just a simple matter of programming to add both.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

message: "I think this article has strong pro windows bias" Well, power users do not exist in mac os x. dunno about linux  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helloguyssmart (talk • contribs) 22:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mac OS X docent have power users
Talk:Immaculate Conception Cathedral School (Memphis, Tennessee)

message: "The high school is the only parochial high school in Memphis."  Really?  What about Memphis Catholic High School?  I am aware that Bishop Byrne High School is now defunct, but I don't think that Memphis Catholic is.  Is it somehow a "diocesan school" rather than "parochial", or some other distinction without a real difference?  Or is the article just wrong?  2600:1004:B140:760D:B1AF:49A:EC2D:D57A (talk) 02:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only?
Talk:Memphis Catholic Middle and High School

message: Was Catholic HS Memphis, TN. alwAys co-Ed? 2600:1700:B780:8100:AC9B:399A:AA0B:641C (talk) 05:33, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co -Ed
Talk:Father Ryan High School

message: Nice start,More pics/text? Victuallers 12:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I stumbled across this article by chance and noticed that there was a lot of text that sounded like it was taken from the school's own pamphlets and point of view or that was, at best, uncited and vague - for instance, in the latter case, all the talk about opinions on the introduction of female students. Obviously, this would be a better article if it had cited, NPOV info on these matters, but, for the moment, I've excised the offending sections. 128.135.207.112 (talk) 20:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: This article looks like it was ripped from a school pamphlet, and if you look at the website listed, it largely is. Sentences such as "These things serve as a constant reminder of Father Ryan's rich history" and "Father Ryan High School is a college-preparatory secondary school with varied programs and courses designed to meet the individual needs and interests of our student population [emphasis added]" speak strongly to this.Coeus24 (talk) 15:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Across Five Aprils (band)

message: We really need some good references in here.  As of now, all the information on here is correct, but there are no references to back it up.  Please help contribute!!!
--Themoonisdown09 12:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Should the new band, A Tragedy In Progress, have its own page?
-Mpete510 (talk) 23:49, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Band
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms/to do

message: The project todo list doesn't have a section for infobox_person and I can't figure out how to add it and make it appear. Can someone assist? AliveFreeHappy (talk) 23:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind - I figured it out. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  People Infobox 

message: A request was made for an article by the same entity who wrote in the article. Can someone take a look at this article and make a judgement if there are any concerns regarding it? I left some of my concerns on the talk pages regarding it. DeusImperator (talk) 04:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done DeusImperator (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  .700 Hubel Express  

message: AliveFreeHappy has not been around for a while and I don't see anyone doing the cleanup etc of the Wiki firearms todo list and making things smoother for the other contributors.  Can someone take over the job that AFH was doing here like:
* keeping the to-do-list up to date
* keeping articles current
* rating article 
* checking for cites etc
We need someone to take over this task.
:I've been plugging away at it as I get time.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:15, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would be interested in helping out here... --Zackmann08 (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need someone to champion the Wiki Firearms Project
Talk:Bedford High School (New Hampshire)

message: I have placed a "mergeto" tag on the article Bedford High School (Bedford, New Hampshire), which covers the same topic as this article.  As there is only one Bedford High School in New Hampshire, this article, with the shorter title, should receive the info from the other article. --Ken Gallager 13:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Bedford High School (Bedford, New Hampshire)]]

message: https://www.cabinet.com/news/bedford-news/2012/04/13/bedford-high-school-ib-program-under-fire/ states that the IB program was threatened by I don't know if The Cabinet Press is an RS
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IB program threatened?
Talk:99 Ways to Die (song)

message: I propose to merge this page with its parent article. All the referenced information were already placed in that article, but if anyone disagrees with this move, feel free to share his thoughts.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded--L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Troy Trojans

message: The beginning of the article states, "Since Troy University moved to Division I-A participation in football and because the two universities no longer share the same conference affiliation, this once heated rivalry has cooled significantly," but it is unclear what the other school is, as three universities are previously named as Troy University's rivals.
:Addressed. Thank you for bringing this up! Fliry Vorru (talk) 01:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rivals
Talk:Universal opportunity

message: Proposing this article for deletion since notability is neither asserted nor established. No independent sources are given. Tagged with notability warning since September 06, but without improvement. Don't know where to merge to (but will copy the content to the talk page of Christianity). -- Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject --B. Wolterding 19:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposal for deletion 

message: Clearly a theology stub, not written comprehensibly, has lingered in atrocious state for over a year. GRBerry 00:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marked for attention
Talk:London Guarantee Building

message: Is the London Guarantee Building also referred to as the Crain Communications Building? If not, where are the two buildings in relation to each other? --Mathew5000 (talk) 11:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: RefDesk gave me the answer that they’re the same.  I’ll add it to the article.--Mathew5000 (talk) 05:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Crain Communications]] Building? 
Talk:Delhi, Louisiana

message: Tim McGraw is from Rayville, Louisiana, not Delhi,Louisiana!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.185.59.55 (talk) 17:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Needle in a haystack

message: I suggest this article be nominated for the official shittiest article on Wikipedia. I'd ask if anyone agrees, but I doubt anyone is going to read the discussion page of such a backwater article anyway. James Callahan 19:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If you don't like it, fix it! And if the subject is so dull, I wonder how you found it in the first place... ;-)
Moyabrit 22:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody add a reference to the Mythbusters episode. I can't be bothered. --Closedmouth 16:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Could somebody reference the OED? Pittsburgh Poet (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So it's a wiki... 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 15:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:List of states and union territories of India by urban population

message: This article must be flagged for statistical bias.
This is primarily because the article lists states by urban population, not urban population percentage. It is not a reliable measurement of urbanisation. Nor is there any significant reason to list urban population alone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.214.115 (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is not relevant / Biased
Talk:List of states and union territories of India by tax revenues

message: Hi  , about the edit on  19:24, 21 May 2018‎, it was a correction from the citations already existed
:: Thank you for explaining. As well, a ping doesn't work unless you sign it with four tidals (~). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits were from the references See Also section of the same page

message: It would be good to have a per capita revenue column to give a better idea of each state's contribution.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsriniva (talk • contribs) 17:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The citation given is from http://fincomindia.nic.in/ShowContentOne.aspx?id=28&Section=1, but the data listed in the table doesn't match what's actually in the report. The data is from the table at page 381 of the report (1st page of Annexure 7.1). It however, doesn't match for all states. For example, the all India figure is correct, 30330.87, which rounds to 303381, but the figure for Maharashtra is wrong. It is 1180 in the wikipedia article and 4518 in the report. In the Wikipedia page, 4518 is reported as the figure for West Bengal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joy.757 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Data mismatch
Template talk:Military of India

message: I added Operation Woodrose to this template and it was reverted. I didn't realize this was controversial and that is why I added it before posting on the talk page. BilCat brought it to my attention that the Military of India denies the operation occurred, so I hoped someone could provide a reliable source for that. I think the issue over inclusion might have to do with the media blackout imposed on punjab at the time. Reliable sources say the operation occurred.
===Talk page references===
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Profitoftruth85 (talk • contribs) 
OK if no one objects I'll go ahead and add it into the template then.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Woodrose

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Profitoftruth85 (talk • contribs) 
OK if no one objects I'll go ahead and add it into the template then.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page references

message: INDIAN COAST GUARD DOES NOT COME UNDER DEFINITION OF "INDIAN ARMED FORCES" or "INDIAN MILITARY". SEE-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Indian_Armed_Forces/Archive_1#Is_Indian_Coast_Guard_a_military_force.3F_No.2C_Its_not
Netstar1 (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: INDIAN COAST GUARD DOES NOT COME UNDER DEFINITION OF "INDIAN ARMED FORCES" or "INDIAN MILITARY".

message: The incident took place between Border Security Force on Indian side and Bangladesh Rifles on Bangladesh side. Indian Army was nowhere involved. Then why this template consists of the link to that incident?--Vyom25 (talk) 13:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Central Armed Police Force should not be on this template. They do not come under Military of India.--Vyom25 (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have not received a response. I am removing the above-mentioned links.--Vyom25 (talk) 11:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 2001 India Bangladesh border skirmish

message: Am I the only one who feels it's disingenuous to categorize 'Annexations' as 'Internal Conflicts,' when by definition to annex territory it had to have at the time been external to the annexing nation?
I propose removing the 'Internal Conflicts' heading entirely, making 'Annexations' and 'Insurgencies' each direct subcategories of 'Operations' alongside 'Wars' and 'External Conflicts.' 104.246.222.223 (talk) 21:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As no further comment was made on this in a week's time, I've gone ahead and implemented my proposal. 104.246.222.223 (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Internal' Annexations
Talk:Les Schwab Tire Centers

message: Does anyone have the Les Schwab logo to donate to this article? BiggKwell 16:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo?

message: There is mention on the main page of a proposal to merge this article with the article on Les Schwab Tire Centers.  I believe this would be a mistake.  Les as a person, one of Oregon's most successful business people, deserves a page dedicated to his biography.   This page will last for 10, 20, 40 years and the face of the Les Schwab Tire Center company will change and evolve in that time.  
Enough information exists on Les Schwab himself to warrant this entry.  Also, he is an icon, hero, and point of inspiration for many within and outside of the company.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.175.185.131 (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Keep the Les Schwab article about Les separate from the Tire Center article. 

message: I think their tire warranty for Les Schwab Tire Centers deserve a section in the article, or at least mentioning, because of what's included in the warranty itself. A partial list is on their website, (Available here). Rabbitdude (talk) 17:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warranty 

message: Anyone else remember that "Les Schmuck" website in the late 90s and early 2000s? Basically a site for people to share their bad Les Schwab experiences. I figure the company probably had the site taken down. --76.115.67.114 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism section?
Talk:Hand Held Products

message: The original Hand Held Products company was totally absorbed into Honeywell, and as far as I am aware, Honeywell has no plans to continue with the "Hand Held Products" brand. Saying it "is the largest manufacturer..." is a bit confusing at the least.
Saying it "was" the largest manufacturer of anything is a bit problematic as it is questionable if this a true statement. The article needs more attention than I could give it at this time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.90.74.76 (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update