Talk:The Wealth of Networks

message: this is an article on a book! - it is definately missing information on the contents!--Speck-Made (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  first review 

message: May I suggest that the first thing you do is reread the material the class wrote on your subject (Wealth of Networks) last semester. I would recommend that someone post the links to those blog posts here. It would then be helpful to outline what was written in these posts *very roughly*. Two to four sentences per post. There will likely be more than 1 post. Other next steps: identify section headings, if they are not already in the article. And then identify what content should go in which sections. You may also need to ask if there are any sections in the book that were not read in the assigned reading, and/or written about in these blog posts, that is essential for the article.--Theredproject (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also not sure if this is the proper forum to ask/discuss these things, but I am going to go with it! I am not sure if there has been a decision reached of some kind regarding division of labor, etc...  I know the deadline for the whole project is March 8th. So I think at the moment, the only thing that has been discussed is the gathering of written material (class provocations from last semester), and summarizing what each provocation focuses on. I don't believe we have discussed how we are going to structure the article / sections of the article yet. But I wanted to volunteer myself - I have a lot of information and writing about the critical reception of the Wealth of Networks, as it was a main focus of my midterm paper last semester, so if we ultimately want a section on that in the article, I can start putting that together. Nbwrites (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello again everyone! Just wanted to let you know - I started a sandbox for The Wealth of Networks in my account - is can be found at User:Nbwrites/sandbox. I just started to put some initial things in - sections headings, etc., but please feel free to change things / add to things. I know we haven't really decided yet how we are structuring the article, but I just thought I'd take an initial stab at getting a sandbox started for us. But we really do need to discuss how we want to approach this - any thoughts? Nbwrites (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, Nbwrites. I agree it's time to delegate and appreciate you getting this rolling and offering critical reception. I am going to find some key quotes from Benkler and add them to the sandbox this afternoon.Hadassahd (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good start all. I would suggest two things: 1. delegate and jump in. It seems like Nbwrites and Hadassahd have sort of self-selected their areas, but i would encourage a more formal delineation of who does what. You can self select, or at this point, Nbwrites and Hadassahd should feel free to delegate, as they have most likely have the best sense of what needs to be done, having done most of the writing so far. 2. move your discussion to the sandbox talk page.--Theredproject (talk) 18:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITP Core 2 Planning Conversation 

message: Hi all, this article is being built over at sandbox talk page. I'm hoping the summaries that Ria# and Coldwater started below can get pasted in over there? I've added some outlines from notes in the sections already, and Nbwrites has worked on a lot of critical reception. Hadassahd (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Where to look for things

message: *Introduction, Amy Kwan, link
*Introduction, Amy Kwan, link
*Benkler & Mass Media [Part 2 / Ch. 6], Hadassah Hill link
*The Wealth of Networks Chapter 10, Kiran link
* Benkler Ch. 8 “Cultural Freedom: A Culture Both Plastic and Critical”; Ch. 10 Social Ties: Networking Together., SKG link
*Optimized Democracy: SEO, PageRank, and the Wealth of Networks, Mandiberg link
*Yochai Benkler, “The Wealth of Networks” – Part One: The Networked Information Economy, Laura Kane link
--Getting this list gathered to start working on the article. Hadassahd (talk) 03:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, now you need to come up with a plan for how to get the appropriate content onto Wikipedia. This might be a good place to make use of a /Sandbox?--Theredproject (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Material: ITP1 Blog Posts

message: * Amy's Provocations on Benkler's Intro
Shift towards decentralised individualised action; Wikipedia question: how does this work for free on volunteer hours; networked aconomy and political values: Benkler's notion of "liberalism"
*Hadassah's Provocations on Pt. 2 Ch. 6
The "ideal" public sphere (PS); history of the development of PSs in the US and control by mass media outlets; need for points of access so that any citizen can engage with the PS without any restrictions or hierarchies to access.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ria4983 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: are these provocations something that will or will not make it into the final Wikipedia article?--Theredproject (talk) 19:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Summaries in Keywords: ITP1 Blog Posts

message: This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course.  As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article.  Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work.  If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further.  If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
* 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
* 1 - A few minutes of work needed
* 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
* 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
* 4 - More than an hour of work needed
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact of recent student edits

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on The Wealth of Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070125161657/http://www.babblebooks.com:80/podcasts/WealthOfNetworks/index.htm to http://www.babblebooks.com/podcasts/WealthOfNetworks/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified