lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bodhi Elfman

message: How Bodhi can be scientologist ? with both of his parents is Jewish ? His he converted ? --SamuelM555 (talk) 02:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the United States people are free to convert to any religion, or none, that they like.  I'm on a break from Project Scientology right now, otherwise I would nominate the article for deletion. Steve Dufour (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He does seem to be featured in numerous web pages, as I've recently added to the external links. Whether they are enough to establish notability I'm in no way certain, but I think that there is a reasonable chance that they might be sufficient to establish his notability. John Carter (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your contributions. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with John Carter, I'm quite certain he meets notability. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientology

message: I removed the link to encyclocentral; the URL leads to an error page.Matipop (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Added credit as guest appearance in Sea 2 Ep 12 of Touch, "Fight or Flight.
Source is by reading the beginning credits.
Victorsteelballs (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me... he appears in many episodes of the show's both seasons... he has a major role... 188.82.225.213 (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New acting credit 
Talk:Bodie Olmos

message: I removed the broken link to his AOL homepage ("Bodie's Official Website (Includes many pictures and how to request an autographed photo)").  I googled and looked on IMDB & the Battlestar Wiki for a new official homepage, but I couldn't find anything.  If anybody knows, please add it back to the links section.  -- Lemming (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Website
Talk:A Case of You (song)

message: What is the reasoning for devoting an entire section to James Blake's cover? His cover was already mentioned in the "Legacy" section, and there aren't any references that suggest his cover is particularly notable. PaintedCarpet (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And it's mentioned in the Legacy section already, along with 17 other cover versions. PaintedCarpet (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Blake cover
Talk:A Celebration

message: I've removed the statement "When questioned about "A Celebration", the band has made comments implying that they do not like the song." as it has been tagged as needing a citation since December 2007. It shouldn't be restored without providing a reliable source to verify it's true. --JD554 (talk) 07:23, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement 
Talk:Bogdan Maglich

message: I am not a physicist, just an avid amateur scientist. I have been following the migma concept and think it deserves serious scientific consideration for the following reasons:
1. It does not require the preparation of any rare isotopes (the collection of which requires enormous energy resources). The articles I have seen named normal lithium and beryllium as the most likely fuel sources. Both are plentiful.
2. It does not produce neutrons.  Therefore it does not produce secondary sources of radioactive contamination which result from the neutron bombardment of surrounding materials. This is the greatest problem facing both fission and fusion.
3. It does not involve a chain reaction. It is a sustained and fully controllable process, according to the descriptions I have read. This reduces the inherent dangers of energy production by many levels of magnitude. As an aside: it is not a candidate for another weapons program, which, of course, makes it very unattractive to many funding sources.
4. It can allegedly be manufactured on very small scales as well as larger installations.
5. It apparently produces an electrical potential directly; electrons are released to one collector and protons to another.  This means that heat is not the main form of energy and that turbines and other moving parts are not involved.  This would be a huge efficiency improvement over all other energy plans I have heard of.
It seems to me that any one of these criteria should generate a great deal of interest in the scientific world and would be reason enough to devote a small portion of the billions of dollars that have been going into a great many other projects, which have so far led nowhere, or done as much harm as good.
Dave Lea 07:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I as anonymous user fail to see what the purpose of Dave Lea's post is. Wikipedia is (as far as I am aware of) not an entity capable of scientific considerations as such. When and if Dave Lea is able to convince an actual scientific organisation to consider Bogdan Maglich's methods and research, I think wikipedia is the right place to post information about said scientific organisation. --82.93.172.114 (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Forest

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: Did the song have completely different lyrics before it became what it is now?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-DE1ndftmPE
--94.222.59.46 (talk) 07:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "At night" version 

message: The 'Release and Promotion' section refers to the song having a "spare and simple 4/4 drum pattern". I'm not much of a drummer, but it sounds like 2/4 to me. Bass, snare, bass, snare, bass, snare... any musicians out there able to confirm one way or the other? It's either 2/4 or an EXTREMELY fast (like 240bpm) 4/4.59.102.15.84 (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement is sourced, though its reliability may be questionable. If you can find a source that says otherwise feel free to change it. Robvanvee 09:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  4/4 time 
Talk:Bogdan Țăruș

message: The correct name is:Bogdan Ţăruş.
--Enzino (talk) 07:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:A Love like That

message: Isn't this a Beetles song? Jecowa 15:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a line in The Beatles' "She Loves You", if that's what you mean... --Fritz S. (Talk) 15:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya. And it should be merged with "She Loves You also. robertjohnsonrj 17:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a completely different, unrelated song. Why should it be merged? --Fritz S. (Talk) 18:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beetles 
Talk:A Night to Remember (Shalamar song)

message: He labeled all the pertinent information as "irrelevant trivia" but didn't really explain why (Mirror Ball 14:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Undid Klow's revision of article
Talk:A Question of Lust

message: Would this be about Kiritimati or Christmas Island?  --Henry W. Schmitt (talk) 05:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas Island 

message: From the text "The live tracks available on some versions of the single are taken from a 1984 concert in Basel, Switzerland."
The 12": Sire / 0-20530 (US) has a liver version of Black Celebration. It is impossible it is from a 1984 concert since it was written in late 1985 and not released until February 1986.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.79.167.152 (talk) 11:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  live version black celebration
Talk:A Question of Time

message: awesome song!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.48.7 (talk) 04:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sign of the Times (Petula Clark song)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:A Slow Descent

message: I would liken parts of this song to alternative metal, what are peoples views of this? 144.131.33.159 (talk) 06:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative Metal
Talk:A Song Is Born (song)

message: Just as a heads up, there is a well known movie starring Danny Kaye of the same title. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.58.60.115 (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Kaye Movie 
Talk:About Us (song)

message: Brooke has never released anything in the UK.If you check chart history you will find no record of her. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.36.50 (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brooke has never released anything in the UK 
Talk:Absolute Beginners (David Bowie song)

message: Parking this here. Lots of info if anyone has the energy to tackle it! https://www.dailywaffle.co.uk/2016/03/absolute-beginners-the-story-of-david-bowies-last-big-hit/
87Fan (talk) 20:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article about the song, for future inclusion into this article
Talk:Acción y reacción

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Acquiesce

message: 1) First of all, it's better to put 'Acquiesce is set to be a single' as it hasn't yet been officially confirmed.  I don't consider online retailers to be official confirmation, although the fact that at least 4 different retailers all have the same information tells us that official confirmation is almost certain to be coming soon (in this case probably on September 11, when the album tracklisting is officially announced).  Because of this, the reference to 'Acquiesce is set to be a single' should be one of those online retailers and not The Sun / The NME as...
2) The NME's article is just repeating exactly what the Sun said, with no different details whatsoever.  Therefore, both articles don't need to be listed as references, only one will do.  Also, The Sun's Oasis articles cannot be wholly trusted (see the Stop the Clocks page for recent history of this.
3) In the 'Tracklisting' section, there doesn't need to be a repeated reference, as it has already been referenced in the opening paragraphs (in this case, to hmv.co.jp).--Mr. Monobrow 16:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes re: The NME, The Sun and references.
Talk:Grand Junction Railway

message: These maps are works in progress. Please feel free to improve or add to them; they can be moved to a template (or two) when ready. They are intended to show the line at opening; and as it was immediately prior to merger into the LNWR. Andy Mabbett 19:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the ones I can think of currently in the West Midlands county. Fingerpuppet 23:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I wonder if there won't be too many stations, to show them all? Does any one have a source for all the sattions, at opening? Andy Mabbett 06:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try this .  It's not that accurate, and it lists stations that were not open in the timeframe we're looking at - such as Bushbury. It's a decent start to target research from, though. Fingerpuppet 10:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: - The first Vauxhall station closed in 1839. There was a temporary station at  which opened and closed in 1838, so no, it wasn't the first to close. I don't know about re-opening though. (Is 8½ years to answer a question a record?!) Optimist on the run (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Across the Sea

message: I changed the key the song modulates to from E-flat major to D-sharp major. It's the same pitch, but D-sharp major is the parallel major to the relative minor of F-sharp major, the original key. E-flat major, though based on the same pitch as D-sharp major, is not the parallel major to F-sharp major's relative minor.
Of course, no one ever writes in D-sharp major, because it has 9 sharps. So unless you want to say it modulates to E-flat major, which is the enharmonic equivalent to D-sharp major, which is the parallel major to D-sharp minor, which is F-sharp major's relative minor, we're stuck.
Another option would be to say the original key is G-flat major, and it modulates to F-sharp minor, which is the enharmonic equivalent of G-flat minor, which is the parallel minor of G-flat major. Then it modulates to E-flat major, which is the parallel major of E-flat minor, which is the relative minor of the original key, G-flat major. But that's no better than the first option.
I say we forget about that first modulation to the parallel minor. It sounds to me like there are several strange modulations in that solo anyway, and ultimately, it ends up on the parallel major of the original key's relative minor. In that case, we say it modulates from G-flat major to E-flat major, then back. That's by far the easiest way to go. I'll change it now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.100.100 (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Key Modulation

message: I think the songwriter has ambivalent feelings towards the japanese female fan. He is definately happy and touched by her honest letter reading it in a melancholy state, but he is probably also humorously exploring the unequal star-fan relationship and the irony of an 18 year-old japanese girl writing a letter to a total stranger she has never met. The lyrics also play on the western perception of asian naivity and has strong quite funny sexual undertones. I have no references proving this, but I think it should reflected in the wiki article.
Kind regards Tobias  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.242.64.2 (talk) 14:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Afro Puffs

message: The video section read as follows:
:== Video ==
:The music video for the song did not break through. Its concept is somewhat like a vision of a feminist utopia with women with burning torches chasing naked men and its strongly emancipated lyrics also encourage women's self-assertion and self-awareness. 
:This shows some controversy with Snoop's girl-humiliating last verse. However the song meant to be an introduction of a new female voice although it never reached the mainstream and her solo debut album was not composed for years. The single was included in her VA 2 LA mixtape album years later.
First of all, calling the concept a "feminist utopia" is hopelessly POV. Second of all, the concept of the song arguably doesn't belong in the video section. The whole thing seems POV, if less clearcut than the "feminist utopia" line, so I removed it. If someone wants to take a shot at revising it, they're more than welcome.--Bltpdx 18:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article cited in the review section of the infobox describes it as "feminist". Lajbi Holla @ me 18:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Video Section
Talk:Age of Loneliness

message: Beautiful but incorrect mongolian song listed. The actual song is, as stated on The Cross of Changes site, "Tosonguyn Oroygoor" Performed by Dechinzundui Nadmid. 77.213.235.131 (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongolian Song 
Talk:Ignatius L. Donnelly

message: You don't need to refer to him as a "quack" and "charlatan". His ideas may have not been accepted by the mainstream archaeological community or not based on actual facts, but there's no need to bring such language into the article. --Revolución talk 00:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a contradiction in this article:
"Ignatius Loyola Donnelly (November 3, 1831–January 1, 1901) was a U.S. Congressman ... Donnelly was the son of an Irish immigrant, Philip Carrol Donnelly who had settled in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On June 29, 1826 he married Catherine Gavin, a 2nd generation American of Irish extraction."
This means he married 4 years before he was born.
Harry Fisher
Los Angeles  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.79.141 (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The "he" in your second quoted sentence refers to Philip C. Donnelly, Iggy's dad. It could be phrased more clearly, but it's not that hard to understand. Idontcareanymore (talk) 08:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A date problem 

message: In the lead sentence he is a populist writer but rest of the lead paragraph only itemizes work for which he is known that can only be called popular, not populist. One sentence about the populist is needed. And then the itemization should use the work popular in order to make the cute point. --P64 (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Populist]] writer 

message: Although ID's archaeological theories have been shown to be wrong, is it correct to call them pseudoscience?  Robert V. Davis Jr., in writing about ID, notes that, "... it provides an example of the difficulty, except in retrospect, of distinguishing science from myth. ...  in the latter half of the nineteenth century, reputable scientists could make a case based on acceptable data and methodologies that not only did Atlantis exist, but that it was also a prime candidate for the origin of the First Americans."  He calls it dubious -- not pseudo- -- science.(The Search for the First Americans.  Science, Power, Politics, 2021, U of Oklahoma Press). 136.36.180.215 (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudoscience?
Talk:Ain't Talkin' 'bout Love

message: There is some POV in this article, unless there are some cites to back up the assertions.  This song has a "punk feel"?  That is HIGHLY debatable and unless somebody can provide a good musical source stating such, then it's POV.  Also a "mideastern" feel?  Right.  The song was all the rage over there.  Without some good cites, that stuff needs to go (and will).  That's "reviewer/taste" stuff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.56.141.143 (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do not understand this section at all. It needs to be rewritten. It just does not make a lot of sense to me. Vorenus (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total Dumpout? 

message: Tried to add a mention of the (notable) 2 Live Crew sample, and correct, add to and streamline the info about Apollo 440. Got blocked by a filter for being an "unconstructive edit". Oh well. Wikibots know best, obviously.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.73.84 (talk) 12:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Dude. Cite a source. Even a super basic one, doesn't even have to be a review for this stuff. It's not hard. Just give us the URL, and tell me exactly what you originally wanted to put there. dannymusiceditor  oops  14:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample info 

message: Says here, in the Allmusic article on the song, that "Ain't Talkin' 'bout Love" is "one of their most covered by other artists". And y'all got nothin'?  I mean, the version I just heard, by Die Hunns (Duane Peters et al.) on their 2007 album on Disaster Records, Live Fast . . . is fantastic and really stands out on the album; but this cover is obviously not the one that should be mentioned first.  (I really didn't expect The Hunns/Die Hunns to have a Wikipedia article, but there is nothing on Disaster Records either?  I must have 15 kick-ass albums that came out on that label.  Oh, well).  You Van Halen fans and metalheads need to get busy.  Just sayin'! :-) Shocking Blue (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers
Talk:Ain't Too Proud to Beg

message: The article already mentions a cover by the Rolling Stones, but I'm curious as to why there's no such section "The Rolling Stones version" or something to that extent.--2601:153:900:43F0:6D13:E9BB:1E32:6A1F (talk) 19:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rolling Stones version
Talk:Aishite Muscat

message: The title of this song is incorrectly romanized.  This isn't unique to Wikipedia---I've seen it all across the internet.  Is it an official mis-transliteration, and should it be corrected?  I've checked my compilation albums that contain the track and it is always written in Japanese, so I can't find any easy evidence that it is an official mistake.  It should be Aishite Mascot (or Aishite MASUCATTO if being precise), since the Japanese is 愛してマスカット.  Ruby took (talk) 08:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization of title
Talk:Aladdin Sane (song)

message: The pianist should be mentioned in the article.78.86.61.94 (talk) 04:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, he is -- we even have a quote from him. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 11:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pianist
Talk:Alan's Psychedelic Breakfast

message: Is there any sources regarding David Gilmour playing bass guitar on Morning Glory? According to PF Encyclopedia Roger Waters was the only bass player on this song. Floyd(Norway) 01:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bass guitar

message: This site: http://pinkfloyd.wikia.com/wiki/Alan%27s_Psychedelic_Breakfast reports microbiotics is the correct one. In our page there's "macrobiotics" written.. --Gionnico (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just listened to it again, carefully, it is "microbiotic" he says. --Matt Westwood 21:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macrobiotics or microbiotics 

message: The Pink Floyd fan page on Facebook has reported that Styles (their spelling) died yesterday, 8 December, of pneumonia.  I'm trying to track down a verifiable WP:RS for the article...  Dismas|(talk) 13:57, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Styles' death 

message: I've just had an edit reverted again from "Microbiotic" to "Macrobiotic". LOOK, IT SAYS MACROBIOTIC, RIGHT? Sorry to shout, but we've been through this. Yes, yes, I know, I know - the correct word is "macrobiotic" but listen to it, he distinctly says "microbiotic" . No I can't find a source that says "microbiotic" beyond various "lyrics" websites which may or may not be allowed as proper sources.
I've reverted it back again because I'm right and the corrector is wrong. --Matt Westwood 21:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macrobiotic or Microbiotic again? 
Talk:All Because of You (U2 song)

message: In the video, it clearly shows that it's Manhattan Bridge which they are passing to get into Brooklyn. 84.57.92.66 09:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Manhattan Bridge