Talk:Keihanshin

message: Why isn't this at Keihanshin? If the term doesn't have any grounding in English, it also seems silly to change the order of the cities in the title. Dekimasu 08:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  This didn't seem to generate a lot of discussion, but it's been a while and no one has raised objections, so I'm following your suggestion. -- Exitmoose (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be like renaming Randstad to Amsterdam-Rotterdam-The Hague-Utrecht... HermanHiddema (talk) 22:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Keihanshin?

message: The page has been removed, so I removed the move request template. -- Exitmoose (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed move request template

message: In the subsection of Economy, it is said that "Keihanshin has the largest economy area in the world". Very nice, but how on earth is it meant? Is it because they make the most PPP or GDP (which, I might add, are both not true, as can be seen in that same subsection :)), or is it because Keihanshin has the most land-area??? (I reckon it a bit strange to include that in this subsection) Or perhaps it is meant in another way? :s So I will remove those remarks, and I reckon it fair that they stay removed untill someone can either proof that Keihanshin has indeed 'the largest economy area in the world', or can elaborate on how the removed sentence is meant. :) --Robster1983 (talk) 10:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Keihanshin has the largest economy area in the world."???

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Keihanshin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202012748/http://www.urban.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/UEA/index_e.htm to http://www.urban.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/UEA/index_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This is very subjective or false:
"Many of these trains operate at speeds that most other countries would consider "high-speed"."
High-speed rail is a defined term, generally meaning 200 km/h on upgraded conventional lines (this case) or 250 km/h on new lines.
Since Japanese narrow gauge conventional lines have generally maximum speed of 130 km/h, this doesn't seem right. Just because some less developed countries don't even have 13 km/h, it does not make it high-speed. Daniel Brvnistan (talk) 08:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conventional rail services 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion