Talk:University of International Business and Economics

message: On April 20 user Sirlanz has removed this sentence in the section on foreign students: "According to a 2011 survey by China National Radio UIBE is one of the ten Chinese universities most favored by foreign students." Reference for this is http://www.china.org.cn/top10/2012-01/17/content_24420997.htm In the original article it says "China National Radio (CNR) education channel, based on votes from Internet users and reviews by experts, have listed, in no particular order, the top ten Chinese universities most favored by foreign students in 2011."
While one can certainly argue about the level of veracity of reports from Chinese state-owned media outlets, the former sentence does give some information about the method used to compile the list of universities. Or at the very least it does not warrant a removal with the reason "No support, just groundless propaganda piece".114.252.71.175 (talk) 08:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  China National Radio on UIBE's popularity 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed, without opposition. bd2412 T 00:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
* Hello, this change is invading UIBE`s name copyright on purpose. Please refer to Talk:Beijing University of International Business and Economics#Merger proposal. Please refer to UIBE`s website http://english.uibe.edu.cn/, and there is no "Beijing" in UIBE`s official name!!! Please "Support" before you do any basic investigation at least. We treat this as legal issue already. Amuwazi (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

text: This page went through the traditional process for renaming a page, approved by an administrator, and I see in no way how the title of the page invades on their copyright. Please explain how this is vandalism. Also please refrain from moving the page until consensus is reached. Thanks! Kharkiv07 (talk) 03:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I take back my previous comment, I now see these pages are the exact same... hmmm... I'll look into it. Kharkiv07 (talk) 03:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Kharkiv, thanks a lot for both your comments. To make it simple, we can not name "Harvard Universty" as "Boston Harvard University" on Wikipedia, right? I think "Boston Harvard University" is definitely invading "Harvard Universty"`s copyright. What`s more, as you mentioned, the content on the two pages are excactly the same. To tag duplicates, at least we need to redirect "Boston Harvard University" to "Harvard Universty", if we didn`t delete "Boston Harvard University" page. I have noticed you have done the redirection. Thank you again for your help to a Wikipedia rookie me.  Amuwazi (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 December 2014 

message: *I propose that Beijing University of International Business and Economics be merged into University of International Business and Economics. In the official name of "University of International Business and Economics", there is no "Beijing". You can refer to its official website "english.uibe.edu.cn". Please pay special attention that there is vandalism in above "Requested move 15 December 2014" to invade UIBE`s name copyright, which should be strictly forbidden by Wikipedia. Amuwazi (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This page went through the traditional process for renaming a page, approved by an administrator, and I see in no way how the title of the page invades on their copyright. Please explain how this is vandalism. Also please refrain from moving the page until consensus is reached. Thanks! Kharkiv07 (talk) 03:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I take back my previous comment, I now see these pages are the exact same... hmmm... I'll look into it. Kharkiv07 (talk) 03:41, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Kharkiv, thanks a lot for both your comments. To make it simple, we can not name "Harvard Universty" as "Boston Harvard University" on Wikipedia, right? I think "Boston Harvard University" is definitely invading "Harvard Universty"`s copyright. What`s more, as you mentioned, the content on the two pages are excactly the same. To tag duplicates, at least we need to redirect "Boston Harvard University" to "Harvard Universty", if we didn`t delete "Boston Harvard University" page. I have noticed you have done the redirection. Thank you again for your help to a Wikipedia rookie me.  Amuwazi (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect University of International Business. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "University of International Business" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]