Talk:GCI Communication

message: Is the correct name of the company "General Communications Inc.", "General Communication Inc.", or "GCI Communication Corp."? And is there officially a comma before "Inc."?
According to whois gci.com:
   General Communications Inc.
   2550 Denali St.
   Anchorage, AK 99503
   US
   Domain Name: GCI.COM
Their web site (even in the About section) only refers to the company as "GCI".
Depending on the correct answer, either some edits need to be made to the page or a page name move (and redirect, please) need to be made. cluth 23:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be General Communication, Inc.  See the documents on this page for multiple use of "communication", published by GCI: http://www.gci.com/about/2008newsreleases3.htm  koolman2 (talk) 11:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communication or Communications? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GCI (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to https://www.lexis.com/research/retrieve?_m=cba47523e41f12f6c2cbd6ab03957de4&docnum=32&_fmtstr=FULL&_startdoc=1&wchp=dGLzVzt-zSkAl&_md5=6b4e68d11e6207e60558cb223f8f19e1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505062052/http://www.gci.com:80/about/coover.htm to http://www.gci.com/about/coover.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm not seeing the issue here. This appears to have adequate references for an article its size. The exact issue  should either be explained here here on the talk page, or  tags added to the specifc disputed statements. If this is not done in a reasonable frame of time the tag can be removed (again). Beeblebrox (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add that when it was added the article looked like this  so it is arguable that the problem was solved some time ago, and since no details were provided at the time, or when the removal of the tag was reverted just now it is hard to know what the objection is, if there really is one and this was not just a blind, drive-by reversion. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm talking to myself here, but after looking at the contribs of the user who reverted the tag it is clear they have been misapplying tags and making other inappropriate edits today, and ther was probably no thought whatsoever put into their re-adding of tags here, so I have removed it again. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  refimprove tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GCI (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505062052/http://www.gci.com/about/coover.htm to http://www.gci.com/about/coover.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified