Talk:List of battleships of Germany

message: I support the suggestion for the merger.Cosal 12:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: I personally agree that these ships should be labelled as battleships, but the actual articles themselves are Gneisenau class battlecruiser, German battlecruiser Gneisenau, and German battlecruiser Scharnhorst. The consensus at those articles is to use the term "battlecruiser", given the sources (Jane's, etc.) that label them as such. Therefore, should we not have some uniformity in the matter, even if we don't agree with the decision? Parsecboy 17:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any reason to.  The articles could only have one name: they had to be called either battlecruisers or battleships with a redirect from the other.  However, there's no technical issue with listing them both here and on a hypothetical List of battlecruisers of Germany.  Note that the class category is listed in both the battleship and battlecruiser structures.  People who consider them battlecruisers and people who consider them battleships should have an equal opportunity to find the information they need without hunting in multiple places because of someone's POV. TomTheHand 19:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems reasonable. Thanks for your reply. Parsecboy 19:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gneisenau and Scharnhorst: BB vs. BC 

message: The image :Image:SMS Grosser Kurfurst.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:SMS Grosser Kurfurst.jpg

message: Hello!
Shouldn't this article include Graf Zeppelin Class ? Bit odd to leave the carriers out. '  Perseus 71 talk 16:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not odd at all. The Graf Zeppelin class were, as you mention, aircraft carriers - not battleships. And, unlike Japan's Kaga, they were not converted battleships either, but built as carriers from the keel up. Thus, they don't count here. Now, a List of aircraft carriers of Germany has promise, though, since there were other German carrier projects. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 17:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm a bit perplexed by that suggestion. This is a list of battleships, not a list of capital ships (which would also include battlecruisers, for which there is a separate list). Parsecboy (talk) 19:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft Carriers ? 

message: The German Wikipedia version of this list includes the Panzerschiffe (Pocket Battleships), but this one doesn't. 82.46.164.90 (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they aren't battleships by any definition of the term. Parsecboy (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panzerschiffe