lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kristin Bauer van Straten

message: WPBiogaphy Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WPBiogaphy 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 06:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment

message: Why are there two different years of birth in this article? Was she born in 1966 or 1973? Aynayz (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: She was born in 1966.Ravenscroft32 (talk) 12:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Report filed at WP:BLPN Bluebonnet460 (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See results  here. Bluebonnet460 (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the results are that she was born in 1966.  [personal attack removed] General Zukov (talk) 02:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the result is that her birthdate is reported as 1973 and 1966 in equally reliable sources. You are making an unsupported judgment call with regard to the accuracy of the sources and the motivations of the BLP subject. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

text: That's not good enough; you need a reliable source. An actor's own website  or other PR material is not a reliable source for anything other than the subject's own opinions (and even those can be challenged). Did you even read the archived discussion? Dusty|💬|You can help! 13:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Looking around the web and drawing inferences is original research. You can do that on a news site but not here. Dusty|💬|You can help! 03:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of Birth 

message: Is there a source for the statement that Bauer is a vegetarian? It's highly unlikely. She is from Wisconsin, which has approximately two vegetarian restaurants in the whole state and which is pretty much all about beef and cheese. Oh and beer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djkernen (talk • contribs) 23:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ridiculous it may be but without a reliable source my objection stands! (Obviously the lack of a reference on the statement is what prompted my objection in the first place!) Peace .... Dave  (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help!  —Preceding undated comment added 18:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bauer A Vegitarian? 

message: Why is the date listed as 2008 when the series aired in 2006? In the history it was originally 2006 before 2008. 64.211.41.195 (talk) 15:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emily's Reasons Why Not Date 

message: Ms Bauer has been married for 10 years to South African Singer/Actor Abri Van Straten. It seems a little amiss not to mention such a significant and important part of her life. Johnwrd (talk) 22:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of marriage to Abri Van Straten?
Talk:Unconformity

message: It would be nice if the descriptive text under the first picture in the gallery said where it was. 109.148.209.229 (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a link to Taum Sauk Hydroelectric Power Station, which is where this unconformity is well exposed . Mikenorton (talk) 23:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First picture in gallery 

message: I've removed this term (and the accompanying diagram) as it seems to be only used on Wikpedia and its mirrors. It may yet become a more widely used term, it is perhaps a useful concept, but there are no supporting sources that I can find. If anyone has a good source for it, I will of course be happy to add it back. Mikenorton (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biconformity
Talk:Action at Barfleur

message: I've re-opened this page as I found  a lot of information about the action, which wasn't going to fit on the Battles of Barfleur and La Hogue page. (there's 50-odd kB of stuff here already)I hope this doesn't upset any applecarts. I've also done separate pages for the actions at La Hogue and Cherbourg, for the same reason. Xyl 54 11:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First comment 

message: I’ve reverted some  changes in the infobox.
The ship casualties are from Aubrey; if you want to add dead and wounded  also, feel free, but don’t delete the ship details. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties 

message: "French victory"? Where do you get that from? What grounds do you have to say it was anything more than indecisive? 
There's already a major discussion on
 this page on this subject; If you have you anything more to say on the subject, you could reply here. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result  

message: The result in the infobox reflects the result at Battles of Barfleur and La Hogue for this phase of the action, and where there has already been a series of discussions about the outcome. 
The reference given covers both parts of the result  (“Barfleur: tactically indecisive” and' “Anglo-Dutch strategic victory”), not just the latter; and as there are any number of British sources claiming an English victory, a French source claiming a French victory is hardly convincing. Xyl 54 (talk) 02:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result, again
Talk:A1 Televizija

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A1 TV channel (North Macedonia) →  – This was not called "A1 TV channel". The change from channel to network is per WP:NCBC. Raymie (t • c) 22:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 August 2020 

message: The article name was, and still is wrong. A1 never was a "North" Macedonian TV network, in the sense that it opened and closed in the Republic of Macedonia, well before the name change. WP:NCMAC established that we will not use "North" historically. Similarly, a relevant decision was made in CfD recently switching the category of "North Macedonian" companies to "Macedonian". I propose this article to be changed to A1 Televizija, which was the original name of the article back in 2007. Ironically I redirected it to A1 (TV Channel) back then. :) --FlavrSavr (talk) 14:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong article name
Talk:Council House, Perth

message: Once again architects engage in self-justifying aesthetic thuggery. How about making them demolish this building with their teeth? Abberley2 (talk) 01:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Mark, for many years the basement level (ground level from the rear) housed the main PCC lending library. Access was from the back.  I remember going there a few times (in the late 70s I think).  I have no details on this but it may be worthy mentioning if a source is available.  My 2¢. Djanga 11:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Library
Talk:Action at La Hogue (1692)

message: I'm aware there is a debate about which name should be used in cases like this, where english speakers have a different name for a place than the people who live there, so I'm putting my justification here.The french name for this action is bataille de la Hougue, after the place name, and it's listed as such on the french wikipaedia (wikipédia, I should say), which is perfectly reasonable and appropriate. the english have called this action variously 'la Hogue', or 'the Hogue', or simply 'Hogue';as this is the english wiki I have opted for the style that is most likely to be encountered in the english literature on the subject (though I've used the french spelling for the place-name in the text, which seems only fair) Xyl 54 12:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name; English or French?

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Benjamin West - William Woollett - The Battle at La Hogue.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 24, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-05-24. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 21:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Benjamin West - William Woollett - The Battle at La Hogue.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Template talk:User typewriter

message: I reverted the text from "This user remembers how to use a typewriter, and that's all you need to know." back to "This user is old enough to remember what a typewriter is, and that's all you need to know."  This is an age and maturity userbox; "old enough" ties it better to age. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 12:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text revert
Talk:Mercedes-Benz SL-Class (R129)

message: It says 1994 in the article but I have seen 320 SL's for sale that claim to be as old as 1991. For example, this one http://carsireland.ie/55245 - it's not a great photo, but it definitely looks like a 320SL to me. Could it really be 1991? 
thanks --Brian Fenton (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the 320SL first come out? 

message: Can we agree this, being a two door, two seater car with folding top is a roadster? --Cloverleaf II (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roadster vs. convertible 

message: I've looked at quite a few R192 (500SL's and SL500's)  and many have the rear AMG badge, but how does one tell if it is a true AMG?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.154.6.232 (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can one tell a true AMG? 

message: R129 is a sport car. It has wheelbase 2515mm.
It made on w124 model, and not on w140. C140 is a grand tourer. R230 is a grand tourer. It has wheel base more than 2550mm and it based on w220/c215. 146.19.220.34 (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  R129 is a sport car
Talk:Lagundri Bay

message: So either a copyvio or OR -  it needs cites - please help with WP:RS  SatuSuro 04:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags

message: Black Kite
:Resolved Sennecaster (Chat) 02:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright query
Talk:Aberth method

message: This page could benefit from at least two more items:
1. A little more information on how the initial z_k values are chosen. Currently, the page just states that they are possible to compute, which is not useful for someone wanting to implement the method.
2. The formula for computing w_k involves evaluating p(x_k) and p'(x_k). What are those? Should it say p(z_k) and p'(z_k) instead?
//T —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.182.96.93 (talk • contribs) 
::1) One can estimate the size of the roots from the size of the coefficients. Chose the initial points randomly inside the  disk of the root radius or perhaps of 1.2 the root radius. The cited paper uses some Gräffe iterations to get a better estimate on the distribution of th roots and chooses initial points accordingly. Using the tangent version of the Graeffe iteration one could even guess approximations for the roots.
::2.) Of course, that should be consistent.--LutzL (talk) 12:26, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first thing one notices in this article is the absence of the phrase that says
: 
: , named after ?????? Aberth, 
: 
(with a link if the person should have a Wikipedia article. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's Aberth? 

message: The method is often referred to as Ehrlich-Aberth method and not just Aberth-Ehrlich method, Google Scholar search for papers related to Ehrlich and Aberth. Are these the same method?
If so, I would add it to the introduction. 2001:638:807:507:4C70:169A:5BB6:8163 (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ehrlich-Aberth vs Aberth-Ehrlich
Talk:Sipora

message: The official name is Sipora, not Sipura. The entry should be changed.
See for example this page on the "Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai" (Mentawai Islands District) governmental website :
http://www.mentawaikab.go.id/index.php/pemerintahan/kecamatan
86.201.240.8 (talk) 15:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Abnormal end

message: Nobody ever uses this expression. Delete this shit.
I use this "shit"... 199.231.28.58 (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean no-one who doesn't ever use a mainframe. 194.159.178.180 (talk) 08:19, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First talk

message: There's nothing here that warrants more than a (sub)section in the Crash (computing) article. WP Ludicer (talk) 19:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A WP:MERGE is a reasonable suggestion. ~Kvng (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

text: I think it should be merged. Please reply to stop the merge. Article contents would be copied to Crash (computing)'s section. Prinaki (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't need its own article
Talk:Absolute OpenBSD

message: I got this book for $4 off of Amazon Marketplace... it's pretty damn good, and 99% of the info in it is still relevant for my OpenBSD 4.1 system. 24.250.30.155 22:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Does this book really need a page here? Is it really noteworthy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.40.46.85 (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worthy of Wikipedia? 
Talk:Civil Service of the Republic of Ireland

message: Controversial moves require consensus. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 19:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have proposed that this article be moved to "civil service of Ireland". This accords with the name of the state which is "Ireland" not "Republic of Ireland" - (See Names of the Irish state). There is, in my view, no room for confusion with the island of Ireland in this case because islands do not have civil services.  The move is currently being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Irish Wikipedians' notice board. Please support this move. Redking7 (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: People don't have the same background and knowledge as you. If someone is not familiar with the political situation of Ireland they may assume that the civil service covers all of Ireland, rather than a part of it. To avoid this confusion, it is better to be clear, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should give clear information.
Re: Image Request - what possible image could you use? As the article says its a "collective term". Removing image request.
Jaqian (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving page from "Civil service of Republic of Ireland" to "Civil Service of Ireland" 
Talk:Sleep Country Canada

message: User:Bigdaddy1981, I noticed you tagged this article for deletion because it appeared to be an advertisement. If you could be more specific about your concern, I would be happy to try to address it. I think you may be using the advertisement tag too liberally, as this article is well referenced and doesn't speak of bargains or special offers. I have made several contributions to this article and have no affiliation with the company. In fact I'm not even one of their customers. I do have their jingle permanently in my head due to their heavy advertising. Clerks. 15:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a nice summary history of a successful Canadian company -- and it will likely be referenced more in the future by fans of Garner Andrews, morning DJ for Sonic 102.9 in Edmonton ... That's why I was looking at it just now. 199.214.24.236 (talk) 23:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Post in Bigdaddy's talk page next time. 70.49.118.5 (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 
Talk:Detective Conan: Crossroad in the Ancient Capital

message: Hello...
Nobody has added anything to this article, after i edited it. I have no idea how well the film did in the Japanese Cinemas. If anybody knows please add it to the article, or any other useful info about the movie. tx. A J Damen 13:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For that particular fact, see Case Closed (manga)#Movies; I have added that completely sourced info ages ago. --Samuel CurtisShinichian-Hirokian-- TALK·CONTRIBS 17:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First header
Talk:Marthe Richard

message: Von Krohn was the head of the German navy in Madrid? Navy in Madrid? German navy?
:Maybe the reason why the Germans lost the war? Of cause not. Von Krohn was the Naval Attaché and thus attached to the German embassy in Madrid. I´ll fix this. Regards -Kallewirsch (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nobodyknows

message: This band is becoming quite notable now. Hero's Come Back, Kokoro Odoru, etc. This article is too vague and unspecific as of their achievements. Let's see articles on their singles, members, etc. Luigi6138 21:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Caption... Left to right, names of members... Not really mandatory, but helpful. Luigi6138 21:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Parts are so poorly written, the format of this article is unique, no new information (that can be classified as constructive) has been added since, what? July? The article is laden with grammar mistakes, and band news is NOT up to date. Please either fix this page, or delete it. Luigi6138 21:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Needs a rewrite for the above reasons. Luigi6138 (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  So, when do you plan to begin the rewrite?  I assume you are planning to do so, since it clearly bothers you so.  I'm just curious, it isn't like you have a WP:DEADLINE any more than the rest of us. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite.
Talk:Deportation of Germans from Romania after World War II

message: The majority of Jews were killed, the majority of Germans survived. A typical manipulation with the word Expulsion.Xx236 13:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: After the World War II deportation of Jews to Transnistria

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:World War II evacuation and expulsion which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 01:01, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in process

message: Currently the article claims that the Soviets took all German able-bodied folk, 30,000, to the USSR - but then later claims that (at the same time in 1945) the Romanian govt sent just "Germans who had supported the Nazis" to the Bărăgan Plain - again putting the number at 30,000. It would be nice to have a bit more clarity... - Snori (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: After a bit of research I've deleted the confusing section. Hope this is now much clearer! - Snori (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify moves to Soviet Unioun ''vs'' to the Bărăgan Plain
Talk:Eurozine

message: This is advertising and needs a speedy delete. Felixboy 13:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SPeedy Delete needed

message: I have removed the superlatives and the self-promotion; otherwise I find this article informative.Simongarnett 14:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, fine. I jumped the gun a bit. Thanks! Felixboy 15:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Objection
Talk:Hansgrohe

message: There is a confusion in this article between the two different enterprises Hansgrohe and Grohe AG, each founded by one of two brothers (like Adidas and Puma). Grohe AG effectively suffered the problems mentioned, but is not identical with Hansgrohe. For further details see the relevant German articles of Wikipedia.158.169.9.14 13:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hansgrohe is the original company founded by Hans Grohe in 1901.  Friedrich Grohe, son of Hans Grohe, purchased the firm Berkenhoff & Paschedag in 1936 and two years later renamed it Friedrich Grohe Armaturenfabrik.  After several mergers and acquisitions, the firm became a publicly traded company in 1991 under the name Friedrich Grohe AG.  Sometime later, probably in the late 1990s or early 2000s, they appear to have become simply Grohe AG, as they are listed on the Impressum page on the company's Web site. — QuicksilverT @ 22:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brand confusion 

message: "Would you like to find out more about the Schiltach think-tank inventions? "  Is this Wikipedia style? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it was lifted/stolen from Hansgrohe marketing literature.  However, the company/brand is of sufficient international notoriety and market importance that an effort should be invested to salvage the article.  The comment above under "Brand confusion" is useful; the German version of the article much more encyclopedic and could be translated in large part for the English Wikipedia. — QuicksilverT @ 20:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like promotional literature for Hansgrohe 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.hansgrohe.com/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hans von Boetticher

message: Re the proposed deletion of this page, on the basis that it is a non notable biography. This article originated from a red link in a taxobox. It seems to me there are three other options. Either we don't put authors in taxoboxes, or we don't link from taxoboxes to authors (as we often don't do with the year), or we leave red links in taxoboxes. Personally I don't like any of those options. I believe that if someone was the classifier of an animal or plant, that in itself makes them notable. Smallweed 14:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, when I proposed this article for deletion it had been tagged since September of 2006 for not having sources and not asserting notability. No substantial edits had been made to the article since it was originally tagged. As a result I proposed deletion. Also, at the time, the article did not mention that He designated the genus Amazonetta to which the Brazilian Duck belongs. I am still concerned about notability. One of the references provided is in German and the other is a link to buy the books. I have still yet to find any information on him written in English. --Cyrus  Andiron  15:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion as of 25 April 2007

message: The following works of Boetticher may provide material for the article. Shyamal 10:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation and interpretation needed