lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Decency

message: This stub is pretty barebones and only mentions some English law. "Indecency" has been defined in US legislation and is a major topic of contention these days. I'll try to update the article soon. Ztrawhcs 14:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  stub 

message: "Gross indecency" redirects here, but is not actually defined in the article. 217.155.20.163 19:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, that's what I was looking for as well. --81.79.29.103 23:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gross indecency? 

message: I was looking for the moral meaning, as in "so-and-so is a very decent person".  That doesn't mean the person dresses modestly or anything like that, etc.  Expand? 67.117.130.181 11:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Expand away :) -BStarky 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article is too limited 

message: I would suggest that everything below the "see also" section be removed. It's just a list of various comments relating to the topic, in no coherent order. It almost looks like a wikipedia discussion page... --69.69.41.43 (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most of this article needs to go... 

message: Hi, where did the merger proposal discussion go (Cannot find it on the Obscenity p. either) ? I am not in favor, by the way, and would rather delete the page which is already on Wikt.--Caleb Crabb 09:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal ?
Talk:Related

message: I put the "issues" notice on this article because, while it has an admirable, awesome lot of material, there is not a single citation.  Which is unacceptable for Wikipedia.  It is really a lovely article, displaying a tremendous amount of work; but for Wikipedia, documenting that work is not trivial, it's fundamental.  Frankly I'd put a few hours into research and just providing the citations myself, but I don't have a clue as to how to begin going about it. 
GcT (talk) 22:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Progressive Award Scheme

message: Sorry - I know the images are not tidy... I've had it with fighting the thing - could someone help and point out what I did wrong? cheers Horus Kol 14:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Position

message: Wow - found some information on the earlier schemes and the period between '64 and '03 is really messed up! If anyone can find some images of these older badges, I would be most obliged - I'm going to get the ones from immediately prior to '03, but need help for the others... Horus Kol 17:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous Award Schemes
Talk:KEF

message: This article seems to have been almost entirely lifted from here - surely a copyright violation? Since the person who added all this content is an anon, it will be difficult to contact them to ask. Unless anyone knows otherwise, I'll flag this page up as needing a rewrite in a few days time. WikianJim 15:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see that as of the 14th March 09 the whole page is now replaced with a copyright warning. I work for KEF and so can most likely get a version of the text in question released under a GFDL if required. I completely appreciate that the text in question is from our web site and is not be entirely appropriate for wikipedia, I have also refrained from starting a new version myself because of NPOV problems. The history that we publish on the web site is factually accurate although it does go into more detail on some points and skims over some others (such as the change of ownership). If there is a neutral party willing to have a shot at rewriting this article I would be more than happy to help them out with facts and figures from KEF wherever possible. Jackocleebrown (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. I don't see any sign that a GFDL release has been acquired, so I have replaced the text with a clean stub that can be expanded on by interested editors. Meanwhile, if you do choose to seek release of the website's text, you can read the procedure at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Thank you for being mindful of COI concerns. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I think KEF Audio --87.65.138.252 23:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  KEF or KEF Audio
Talk:Leptochilus pteropus

message: There only needs to be one page for Java Fern.  I think the standard for plants is to use the binomial so the page should be Microsorum pteropus Zabdiel 15:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I wonder what makes it bitter.
It absorbs UVB light, BTW, so maybe it does denitrification.
Mine has finer leaves than depicted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brewhaha@edmc.net (talk • contribs) 07:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alkaloid?
Talk:List of bibliographic databases

message: So far this is a list of vendors, not databases.  There is a difference between the vendor or platform and the indexes that they offered.  Oftentimes a given database can be offered by different vendors.  This needs to be started over.  Rlitwin 15:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah sorry about that, I have deleted it. I'll let someone who knows what they are talking about start it.--Commander Keane 19:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: As was said above a couple of months ago, this is in fact mostly a list of vendors rather than of databases. For example, Ovid Technologies is not a database. In a list of databases I would expect to see medline, embase, cab abstracts, eric, cinahl etc - not ovid, csa, ebsco. This needs addressing. Maybe best split into two articles, List of bibliographic databases and List of bibliographic database providers? Gnusmas 10:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And so you will. Havent gotten to it yet. I;ve first been working on the items on the page already when it was renamed from search engines. Please help and add some yourselfDGG 02:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Databases or vendors?

message: I have centraized further discussion on the redirect that has just vandalized the list,  on the 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Academic_databases_and_search_engines page. DGG 02:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: please ask first.
Talk:Civic amenity site

message: A major constraint in the optimal recyling of materials is that at civic amenity sites, products are not disassembled by hand and have each individual part sorted into a bin, but instead have the entire product sorted into a certain bin. 
This makes that extracting of rare earths and other materials is uneconomical (at recycling sites, products typically get crushed after which the materials are extracted by means of magnets, chemicals, special sorting methods, ...) and optimal recycling of for example metals is impossible (an optimal recycling method for metals would require to sort all similar alloys together rather than mixing plain iron with alloys).
Obviously, disassembling products is not feasible at civic amenity sites, and a better method would be to sent back the broken products to the manufacturer, so that the manufacturer can disassemble the product, for example for making new products or atleast to have the components sent seperatly to recycling sites (for proper recyling, by the exact type of material). At present though, no laws are put in place in any country to oblige manufacturers of taking back their products for disassembly, nor are there even such obligations for manufacturers of cradle-to-cradle products.
perhaps add in article
KVDP (talk) 10:53, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Constraints
Talk:Alfred H. Barr Jr.

message: Dear Administrators: 
I believe I have provided what is sufficient for an Art History stub. I have provided information on other resources for a student to pursue if he or she wishes to find out more about Alfred Barr. I have also provided a quote from the art historian. The background of the subject is harder to find; however, I can research this if it will allow me more time to make this page a viable contribution to the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your consideration. 
Sincerely, 
Jonathan Fletcher 10:13, August 2, 2006
:Hi, this was not tagged by administrators.  Additionally, your present edits do not indicate why the subject is notable.  Please read Wikipedia:Notability, the guidline/policy for the criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. - CobaltBlueTony 15:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Flexcar

message: I’m a PhD student at Northwestern doing research on hourly car rental services like FlexCar and ZipCar, and I'm looking for interview participants to talk about their car rental experiences. I'm based in Chicago, but we can arrange to do a phone interview if you're not local. Please contact me if you’re interested in participating. Thanks! Bokonon6 14:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-read the article, and it seems neutral to me.  Yes, there is an article on Pepsi, among many other corporations.  This article size and content is consistent with others in :Category:Car sharing and :Category:Companies based in Seattle, Washington. Cacophony 16:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Research

message: I'd rather not get accused of original research based on personal experience, but are there any news reports of difficulty in contacting member services, long hold times, and frequent hang-ups with the call center? That and cars with hardly any miles dinged up and messy... Gront 03:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism?
Talk:Statistical thermodynamics

message: The results of the merge discussion can be found at Talk:statistical mechanics.  Thanks:--Sadi Carnot 15:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not convinced. Can you define the difference bewtween the two topics in one or two sentences? --Pjacobi 13:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

text: With a slight risk of restarting an old battle, I've posted some suggestions about a general merger of this topic at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Statistical_physics_.2F_mechanics_.2F_thermodynamics.  Djr32 (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge consensus

message: I found this on User:HappyCamper's page and pasted it here. --Sadi Carnot 02:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice template (made by [[User:HappyCamper]])

message: Statistical thermodynamics is another name for statistical mechanics, therefore there should be one article for the concept, not two.
(I realise that this was discussed 2 years ago at Talk:Statistical mechanics#Merge Statistical thermodynamics, but never seemed to go anywhere.)  Djr32 (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The way that merge was carried out made the article very unclear. See Talk:Statistical mechanics#Mechanics or thermodynamics?. Brian Jason Drake 05:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanics or thermodynamics?
Talk:Zoobilee Zoo

message: This article is one of [ thousands] on Wikipedia that contain a link to YouTube. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message on the talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. Because the source and legitimacy of videos on YouTube is almost impossible to determine, almost all of them are not reliable sources and are not verifiable. 2. Many videos on YouTube are of questionable copyright, which should not be linked from Wikipedia. If you are not sure whether the link on this article should be removed or if you would like to help spread this message, contact us on User talk:J.smith/YouTube Linklist. Thanks, Renmiri 15:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: <noinclude>Regarding the [[YouTube]] link(s) on this article:</noinclude>

message: I think someone needs to get rid of how long Zoobilee Zoo aired in regards to the syndications episodes and just put how long it aired when new episodes were coming on. Who cares about how long it aired in syndication. People want to know how long it aired when it was brand new TareTone 02:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Air info

message: The article indicates that only 15 episodes were aired, however both Hallmark's Zoobilee Zoo site (http://www.zoobileezoo.com/pbs.htm) and TV.com's listing for the show (http://www.tv.com/zoobilee-zoo/show/23832/episode_listings.html?tag=subtabs;list) show a 65-episode original run. This should be fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.253.197 (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Episodes

message: I noticed that ZoobileeZoo.com has been taken down. Did something happen? Angie Y. (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: zoobileezoo.com
Talk:Rena Sofer

message: from reading the article, I think it undervalues her appearance on Seinfeld. There are several details about some of her other roles, so I think the details of her memorable appearance on one of the biggest sitcoms of all time merits a full description. (unsigned comment)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.117.235 (talk) 10:41, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. You have to help us out here. First of all you have to sign. Four tildes; just click where it says Sign your name:. Second, you have to not just write where she wasn't raised but also where she was raised, and source it if possible. Third, if you're confident the information is accurate, edit the article, don't just write about it.Johann Schlinker 00:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB isn't exactly the website of record...stuff can be written by anyone, just like here. Anyone have any verifiable info about where she was born/raised?? NickBurns 15:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: I took out the "curse" comment. It may well be true, but that's unverifiable, POV and opinion. NickBurns 15:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ch-ch-changes 

message: She also played in Saved by the Bell: Hawaiian Style as Andrea Larson, one in the long list of Zack's love interests.  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105321/
Justanurse (talk) 12:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition to credits
Talk:East Side Kids

message: It'd be good to say what country these films are from, what years they ran, in the first sentence or paragraph. -- ben 15:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context needed 

message: I'm seeing that there are a lot of links to IMDB specifying on a different actor. Should we only keep the ones that are notable? SchfiftyThree 21:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel that each person, even if one a member for one film, should be listed because they were a part of the team.  To leave anyone out would be ignoring a significant part of the East Side Kids history. Donaldd23 00:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:Nassi–Shneiderman diagram

message: Nassi-Shneiderman diagrams are only rarely used. Their abstraction level is close to structured program code and modifications require the whole diagram to be redrawn.
Why does it have to be completely redrawn? --Abdull 15:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Based on scanning through the article, I guess these diagrams are meant to be read starting from the top and working downwards.  Is this correct? Jowa fan (talk) 06:42, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we read these from top to bottom? 

message: Would it be useful to add pseudocode to the examples, so it becomes clearer what the diagrams represent? Rchard2scout (talk) 16:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  pseudo-code 

message: The reference "Isermann" ist not valid, this is a collection of more than 60 papers; please include the correct reference
See -> http://books.google.de/books/about/10th_Triennial_world_congress_of_the_Int.html?id=mkJGAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Or select other.
--Ayloxs (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference not valid =
Talk:Merouane Zemmama

message: Entry edited to remove juvenile nonsense, which was almost certainly written by a Hearts fan. --212.113.23.124 15:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lori Loughlin

message: Why does it have to be such a CREEPY photo???? There are thousands of better alternatives, c'monnnn  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.169.47 (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is horrible but no one has produced a better one that is properly licensed for inclusion here. MB 19:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her main photo
Talk:Dysteleology

message: I don't know if adherants of the Anthropic Principle are necassarily committed to rejecting dysteleology. There is a big difference isn't there between constraints (that exist because we exist) and design or directedness. I agree that two can intersect, but the former does not seem to entail the latter. With all the variations of the anthropic principle, wouldn't it make more sense to say that some of the variations are committed to rejecting dysteleology, but not all? I think the summary of the different variations of the Anthropic principle in the Anthropic priciple entry supports this. Anyone?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Humble Coffee (talk • contribs) 
I fail to see how this philosophy could, in any way, be described as “optimistic”. Optimistic nihilism sounds like an oxymoron.97.116.64.212 (talk) 03:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

message: In what way is this philosophical stance "aggressive"? Hundovir (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dysteleology is an aggressive, yet optimistic, form of science-oriented atheism...
Talk:Deadly weapon

message: Contrary to popular belief, holding a black belt (or comparable rank) in a martial art does not require one to register parts of one's body as deadly or dangerous weapons.
Is this really a popular belief? --Big gun 16:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: IIRC, deliberately ramming or running over a person with an automobile also qualifies as "assault with a deadly weapon". — Red XIV (talk) 23:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Automobiles

message: Someone appears to be vandalizing this page. I had marked it for speedy deletion before realizing that there were older, more proper editions. I hope I reverted to the best but I didn't take the time to compare too many --80.218.75.207 (talk) 18:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism of this wiki-article

message: Just saying. There's absolutely no citation in this article. How am I supposed to debate this subject with my smartass coworker without sources?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.0.238.72 (talk) 22:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are firearms really classified as deadly weapons? In which countries? Citation needed. 

message: What does "animate or inanimate" in the text means? Does this means that replicas/fake weapons (weapons that are designed to look like the real counterpart, but is completely inert and incapable of causing bodily harm) does still count as a "deadly weapon" or "dangerous weapon" just because you can use it as a threat to deadly force?
Examples of such weapons would be replica pistols, theathre knifes (these are knifes where the dull blade will by spring force disappear into the handle of the knife when you "stab" someone with the knife, so it looks like the knife goes into the body of the person, but in reality the blade goes into the handle) Sebastiannielsen (talk) 15:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Replicas? Fake weapons?
Talk:T-24 tank

message: T-24 is The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods.
Added Soviet AFVs of wWII template.
Could we replace the Komintern section with the following?:
Overview:
 
The Komintern artillery tractor was a product of the Kharkov Steam Locomotive Factory (KhPZ). It was capable of towing heavy guns and howitzers and was produced prior to The Great Patriotic War.
Description:
	
Since the Komintern was designed to tow heavy artillery, the first 50 tractors had a powerful engine (4 cylinder 15 l. 131 hp gasoline), a fully enclosed truck cab behind the engine, followed by a wooden cargo bed or benches for up to 12 gun crew. The tractor featured a long, more effective track and suspension borrowed from the company’s T-12/T-24 medium tank which gave a comfortable ride, and a winch was fitted for vehicle recovery tasks.
Development:
Production of the Komintern began in 1934. In 1935 the Komintern went into full production using the chassis and suspension from the company’s T-24 tank project. 1798 tractors were produced from 1934 to 1940. As many as 560 were still in service by 1945. 
Operational Notes:
The Komintern was capable of towing the heaviest Corps and Army level guns in Soviet service, including the wheeled ML-20 152mm gun-howitzer, the tracked B-4 203mm howitzer, and BR-5 280mm mortar. It was also assigned to heavy tank recovery units.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallingLeaf406 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The Voroshilovets heavy artillery tractor was also based on the T-24's suspension, using the same but detuned Model V-2 diesel engine as the BT-7M and T-34 tanks".
Shows a photo of a tractor with very obviously completly different suspension system.
Ni
Nice.
Idumea47b (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspension
Talk:Psychological bond

message: Article doesn't actually define what a psychological bond is.
Crossref: Affectional bond. FT2 (Talk | email) 16:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

message: In light of the weaknesses of this article (stub status, lack of references, original research) I moved some of the content over to human bonding and redirected this page to there. The human bonding article is pretty broad (including bonds with animals) so I think we can cover any "psychological bond" issues there. Issues related to animal bonding, imprinting and such can be covered in other articles. --Jcbutler (talk) 18:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Happy Joe's

message: He original Happy Joe’s was in the East Village of Davenport, Iowa. You can look at Joe Whittey’s  obit to verify  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.23.122.80 (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

message: The last paragraph needs to be fixed. Please see WP:WEASEL for help on cleaning it up. - Vessels42 16:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Happy Joe's has made a major expansion into the middle-east and North Africa. They also have two new locations coming into Florida as well. With this, the article will most likely need to be rewritten. I'm not sure how to go about this without potentially breaking any rules, but for anyone wanting to do this, I'd suggest taking a look at articles for Dominos Pizza, Pizza Hut, etc and use those as a rough guide on how this article should look given their national expansion beyond the Midwest. Moline1 (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite page
Talk:1999 Ontario general election

message: moved this here for the time being Pete Peters 16:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: dido Pete Peters 14:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I have no need for them.  I just thought these would be used for the Electoral districs entries. Pete Peters 22:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: So... why don't you add some? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 00:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Aristophanes Plays

message: I replaced the image :Image:Aristophanes.jpg with the text ΑΡΙΣΤΟΦΑΝΗΣ ΦΙΛΙΠΠΙΔΟΥ ΑΘΗΝΑΙΟΣ (Aristofanis Filippidou Athinaios, "Aristophanes, son of Philippides, of Athens"). The image, a bust of Aristophanes that can be found in the Uffizi, was deleted for lacking a source. The text is the caption on the bust. howcheng  {chat} 16:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I've reverted this to the designer's original as there's no need for it to be collapsible; it is small and the original design is better. DionysosProteus 21:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navbox conversion 