Talk:Fox Television Stations

message: Wouldn't a duopoly be a situation where only two companies own all the TV stations in a particular market? In this article it seems to be used to refer to a situation where FTSG is central-casting two stations from the same facility, regardless of how many other companies are in the market. If this is some sort of industry lingo, I think it should be defined. It strikes me as being POV, as a very loaded word. IEdML 17:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the US usage of the term is confusing in this respect. The term twinstick is used outside the US for this reason, but American broadcasters are prone to use "duopoly" in this manner. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Duopoly? 

message: http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/disney-deal-whats-left-at-fox-1202636629/
According to Variety in December 2017. Fox News, Fox Television stations, Fox Broadcasting and Fox Sports national division will be part of a spinoff company.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.130.165 (talk) 17:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fox Television stations not included in the Fox/Disney deal

message: http://www.adweek.com/tvspy/fox-may-buy-10-sinclair-stations/198878
It's the result of the Sinclair Tribune deal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:8270:0:0:0:AF87 (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fox to get 10 divested Sinclair Stations

message: So what if they syndicated these two 20 years ago? Isn't it still fact and important? 71.111.214.233 01:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double Dare & Finders Keepers 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Fox Television Stations Group → Fox Television Stations — The official name for this subsidiary of News Corporation is Fox Television Stations, Inc. proof  I have tried a manual move, but the system would not allow me to do so. Rollosmokes 04:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. Some pages and a FOX press release capitalize "Group", but they also uncapitalize it so it may be a matter of confusion about the proper noun. "Inc." is in more prevalent use especially officially. :Category:Fox Television Stations Group should be an uncontroversial rename after this is moved. –Pomte 14:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 14:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. Some pages and a FOX press release capitalize "Group", but they also uncapitalize it so it may be a matter of confusion about the proper noun. "Inc." is in more prevalent use especially officially. :Category:Fox Television Stations Group should be an uncontroversial rename after this is moved. –Pomte 14:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 14:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Image:FTSI.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FTSI.jpg

message: Please have a section mentioning NewsNOW, which is a streaming headline/breaking news service (also has a YouTube channel) originating from the Fox owned-and-operated stations, notably KSAZ. It launched in 2014.--Msr69er (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NewsNOW from Fox