lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flier (fish)

message: which?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.20.94 (talk) 01:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "out 3 cm (one foot)" 
File talk:WorldWarII-MilitaryDeaths-Axis-Piechart.png

message: Ha, I like that Germany's black.--Loodog 02:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

message: How come Finland, Thailand, and Iraq are not listed in the pie chart. Finlands casualties fighting the russians exceed those of bulgaria which is listed, yet finland is not listed.XavierGreen (talk) 23:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Axis Co-Belligerants
Talk:Mangrove snapper

message: I've found several places on the net that associate Managat with the Mangrove Snapper, e.g. here and here.
But Managat refers to a fish common in the Philippines (and is afaik a Visayan term), what doesn't fit with the distribution given in this article as well as on fishbase. Does anyone know more? -- Käptn Weltall (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Managat
Talk:Ctenoglypta newtoni

message: A little digging shows that Ancey erected Ctenoglypta using Helix newtoni as the type species. e.g.
In Mollusca für 1901-1904 : geographische Verbreitung, Systematik und Biologie
:Ctenoglypta n. gen., Typus Helix newtoni Nevill ; Ancey 1904 J. Conch. v. 52 p. 306. 
In Zoological Record, 1904, p 62
:Ctenoglypta, n. gen. for Helix newtoni, Nevill ; Ancey, J. Conchvl. lii, p. 306. 
Helix newtoni appears as "n. sp." in Descriptions of new Mollusca from the Eastern Regions, — by 
Messrs. G. and H. Nevill. in Journal of the Asiatic Society, part II, No 1 (1871)
So it should be Ctenoglypta newtoni (G. & H. Nevill, 1871) or Ctenoglypta newtoni (Nevill & Nevill, 1871)
: See this entry on Red List William Avery (talk) 16:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct taxonomix authority
Talk:John Shying

message: His surname, Mak, is probably spelled 麥. Not sure about the other two syllables. Badagnani 03:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His signature is on his wedding certificate which is on a picture on page. I understand the characters are an older form of chinese script ;) DDB 07:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is 麥世英 -- ran (talk) 17:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese characters

message: His Australian connections are substantial and all that is currently known about him at this time. DDB 12:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Connection 

message: Anyone know how to correctly place the category for Australia or China? DDB 15:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 
Talk:Technetium-99m

message: Hi Sbharris,
in relation to your recent edit, I'd like to request clarification on a couple of points:
*What is your concern with the phrase "enduring excited state"? To my mind, it is enduring by the standards of excited states, not just by the standards of gamma decay. Or you could think about it as enduring by the standards of nuclear isomers, which is really the only way you get gamma decay anyway. I like to minimize the complexity of the introductory sentence of major sections, so I'd like to reduce the number of words here if we can.
*Why is "daughter decay product(s)" a better term than "daughter elements"? I'm very used to hearing the latter, but this is my first encounter with the former.
--Yannick (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Enduring excited state" and "daughter decay products" 

message: http://www.anl.gov/articles/scientists-develop-affordable-way-generate-medical-isotopes
68.14.251.158 (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "New synthetic route from ANL?" 

message: The article states, "Technetium-99m was discovered as a product of cyclotron bombardment of molybdenum."  However, it doesn't state what the molybdenum was bombarded with.  Electrons, maybe?  Anyone know how to find out for sure?  Thanks.  Art Smart Chart/Heart 16:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess is since molybdenum's atomic number is 42 and technetium's is 43, it must be by positron bombardment, turning a neutron into a proton.  That would keep the atomic weight 99, but increase the atomic number by 1.  Does that make sense?  Thanks again. Art Smart Chart/Heart 16:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclotron Bombardment of Molybdenum -- With What?
Talk:Masona

message: Is the Paul of Mérida credited with authoring the VPE a different person from Paul (Bishop of Mérida), one of the Vita's subjects, who could not have been writing about Masona? My sources don't name the author. —Srnec (talk) 01:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't make the link, thinking not so, according to Wikipedia's article Paul, Bishop of Mérida, which mentions "Paul's later biographer, the author of the Vitas Patrum Emeritensium." I have no independent information, Srnec.--Wetman (talk) 03:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt we have two Pauls of Mérida, but I'll look into it when I get around to creating a VPE article. Srnec (talk) 05:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul of Mérida
Talk:New Jersey Lottery Festival of Ballooning

message: Should this article title be changed? It discusses the annual festival, the name of which changes with sponsorship.  The article title names the former sponsor 98.221.206.81 (talk) 11:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sponsorship in article title
Talk:Belle Tout Lighthouse

message: There is a recent (October 2013) new book Belle Tout - The Little Lighthouse That Moved   which may be valuable to editors.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 01:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New, relevant resource. 

message: The article doesn't explain the origin of the unusual name, unless I've missed it somewhere. --Ef80 (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Cytora hirsutissima

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Cytora

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Solidarity lending

message: The article discusses the photograph at :File:BRAC villageorg 1.jpg (displayed on the right) in the Criticisms section:
The photo above—of a group of women seated in rows on the ground before a male NGO-officer who sits in a chair processing their payments—encapsulates another common critique. Solidarity groups may be composed entirely of women, but the staff who decide when and if they receive financial services are often dominated by males.
Unless the article references reliable sources that discuss the photograph in this manner, the paragraph quoted is considered to be original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia per policy.
I presume that some of the sources in the Impact of microcredit article's section on the empowerment of women may discuss the issue, such as Parmar (2003) and may be used in this article, though I have not checked if they refer to solidarity lending. --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of the photograph
Talk:Library of Friedrich Nietzsche

message: Did Nietzsche read Tocqueville?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.93.214 (talk) 23:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tocqueville

message: Surely something could be added about Nietzsche's appreciation of Montaigne?
Wilhelm Ritter 03:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Schopenhauer as Educator, § 2,  N. appreciatively wrote of Montaigne: "That such a man wrote has truly augmented the joy of living on this earth." Then N. misquoted Montaigne from memory and produced a ridiculous comment. N. wanted to show that he derived several of his ideas from Montaigne, just as Montaigne had taken ideas from Plutarch. "…I at least have come to feel what he [Montaigne] felt about Plutarch: 'as soon as I glance at him I grow a leg or a wing.' " But Montaigne did not say that he grew [gewachsen] a leg or a wing. He said that he "took out" or "pulled out" [tire] a leg or a wing from Plutarch’s writings, as one would do to a roasted chicken at the dinner table. In other words, Montaigne said that he took ideas from Plutarch. See Montaigne's Essays, Book 3, "On Some Verses of Vergil." The metaphor that Montaigne used was that Plutarch's writings were like a roasted chicken and that pulling off a leg or wing was like utilizing some of Plutarch's ideas for his own writings. Nietzsche was trying to say that he took [took out, pulled out a leg or wing] some ideas from Montaigne. However, his misquotation made it seem as though he meant that his abilities increased [grew a leg or wing in order to run or fly] when he came into contact with Montaigne’s writings. Nietzsche was notified of his mistake and was corrected by a correspondent, but he ignored the correction.Lestrade (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Montaigne

message: Does this really need it's own page? I think this should be put in as a segment in the Nietzsche page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.129.202.141 (talk) 00:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Really
Talk:Eras (typeface)

message: Hi. The Eras typeface was used and adopted by the 1998 FIFA World Cup.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nica2009 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Hi. I added a link to the owner's (ITC) website for ITC Eras. Should the MyFonts.com link be removed? It seems that the owner's website would be more relevant and contains similar information. --StackLaw (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus is clear. I see rough consensus to move the DAB to the base title, but this could probably be subject to a further discussion. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Eras →  – Per WP:NOPRIMARY, and the The Eras Tour, I think that Eras should direct to Eras (disambiguation). To do this, the typeface needs a more specific title. BenKuykendall (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support and Redirect to Era Notsammyray (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 September 2023
Category talk:Fictional characters with accelerated healing

message: This category is not properly defined. It assumes that "Accelerated" means "faster than normal", but does not give a base speed. For example Wolverine (comics) is on the list being able to heal from normally fatal damage in seconds, but so is Spider-man, who only heals slightly faster than a normal human. Also included on the list is character who heal at a normal rate, but can hela damage not normally healable, such as regrowing limbs. Shouldnt there be a set stat was to what is considered "Accelerated" and who is included on the list. The list is over 200 entries long now. (Animedude 03:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope

message: Is this lis supposed to include those who can heal themselves with magic or other non-organic methods? 
Though magic is technically taught to the user, it's also usually an inherant ability to them.WickedKnightAlbel (talk) 05:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: definition

message: I think we should add subcats for those of DC and those of Marvel characters at the very least. It would remove a huge chunk from the main category and make it easier for users to navigate. Plus, we already do the same thing for fictional charactrs with superhuman strength and fictional characters who can move at superhuman speeds, so why not those with accelerated healing?--Piemanmoo (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs sub-categories
Talk:Supersize

message: This page looks like it was written by a bunch of tools whom just watched the stupid "Supersized" movie too much and gave it a particle of credence.
:I agree. It isnt even correct. Dino-Sized fries were bigger than a super size. The container was also cylindrical - it was like, roughly a 24oz pop cup full of fries.
Eric Forest (talk) 05:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as I can still supersize my McDonald's meals anywhere in the city of Las Cruces, NM in the year 2011.--BruceGrubb (talk) 11:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm seeing images of cups, fry boxes, and placemats with the Super Size branding as early as 1987. https://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonliebigstuff/32978575012/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonliebigstuff/6552760395/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonliebigstuff/4310389523/ Mopenstein (talk) 22:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Supersized

message: * I have removed the  tag from , which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.  Thanks! Colonel Warden (talk) 00:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD
Talk:Catalan

message: I am currently proposing that the Garrigues page should be replaced by the content now found on the Garrigues (disambiguation) page and the the material presently on the Garrigues page should be moved to a new page to be titled Les Garrigues, Catalonia If you have the time I would appreciate your comments on the Discussion page at Garrigues. I hope you will agree. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garrigues
Talk:Kathleen Sullivan (journalist)

message: Can anybody who is familiar with this topic put in a "Personal life" section?  Thanks in advance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.52.119 (talk) 01:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal life

message: Ms. Sullivan is not shy about her firing. "They called me old, unattractive and said, 'No one wants to look at her anymore,' " Sullivan told a reporter. "I broke a lot of news interviews, but that wasn't important to them."https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1995-03-19-1995078024-story.html   This is definitely worthy of inclusion in the article. Wlmg (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firing
Talk:Fruit Gems

message: I'm not sure if this is an error or not, but the flavors listed include pineapple, (I didn't think this was correct) and doesn't include grapefruit, (which is definitly a flavor).  Hope this helps.74.33.0.100 (talk) 13:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah you're correct. I think they used to come with pineapple flavor years ago in the 80's and early 90's, but now if you look at their recent packaging, there is no pineapple and instead has been replaced with grapefruit. TheSameGuy (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flavors
Category talk:Extinct animals of the United States

message: I've returned this category to :Category:Death in the United States.  :Category:Extinction is part of :Category:Death.  Therefore, it is appropriate to include an Extinction by region category in a concurrent Death by region category.  The only way this would not be appropriate would be if a) :Category:Extinction were removed from :Category:Death, or b) :Category:Death in the United States was renamed and rescoped at WP:CFD to :Category:Human death in the United States. Kurieeto 03:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drymaeus

message: There seems to be a major splitting of this genus (and others) according to this paper:
Salvador RB, Silva FS, Cavallari DC, Köhler F, Slapcinsky J, Breure ASH (2023) Molecular phylogeny of the Orthalicoidea land snails: Further support and surprises. PLoS ONE 18(7): e0288533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288533
Relevant table 
EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 19:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus revision
Talk:Yorkshire, Virginia

message: Why do we have a CDP AND an unincorporated community designation for this place?...Per this article Census-designated_place ad the census bureau, MOST if not ALL CDPs are unincorporated.....Coal town guy (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: [CTG asked me to come here] Yeah, it's basically a redundancy.  The only incorporated CDPs are those that shouldn't have been created in the first place (i.e. the Census Bureau made a mistake), those that got annexed after the census date, and those that incorporated themselves after the census date; see Yakutat (CDP), Alaska and Bunche Park, Florida for the first and second categories, while I can't think of any in the third.  All three, put together, are rare enough that unincorporated status should be assumed, making "unincorporated and CDP" rather redundant.  Nyttend (talk) 03:12, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My only concern is and was, I have no desire to see thousands and thousands of articles with double or triple designations.....honest and for true......I very much appreciate any conversation where a mutually agreed upon set of actions is foundCoal town guy (talk) 03:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot to say that the definition of CDP requires that such places be unincorporated.  For this reason, when a CDP's entire boundaries become incorporated, we're justified in declaring it a former CDP even if the Census Bureau doesn't announce changes, just as we are justified in calling a place an unincorporated community when the Census Bureau doesn't yet know that a municipality has dissolved itself.  On top of that, if part of a CDP becomes incorporated by whatever means, we're justified in referring to the CDP as a CDP because part of it still exists as unincorporated area.  Nyttend (talk) 03:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT IS GOING ON??? 
Talk:Oregon Judicial Department

message: I'm not too sure how the "oregon State Bar" should be handled in this page.
It's a so called 'integrated bar'  which is a government agency for some purposes and a private trade association for others,  often called a "Quasi public" agency.   Consequently although for some purposes it is a public agency, it is governed by a board elected by the lawyers,
and the employees of the Bar are not government employees.Rvannatta 00:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally someone will get around to writing Oregon State Bar, as about 13 articles link to it and many more could. That would be the best way to handle it, then on this article move the current info to it's own sub-section with a "see main" and brief mention of what the bar does and the relation to the OJD. What is there now is basically a regurjitation from the OJD website altered to avoid COPYVIO problems. As a lawyer you have more insight into the bar, I only keep getting the "join now as a law student" letters wanting money. And other than the PR class with the ethics violations info, I have little knowledge of how the OSB works. Aboutmovies 00:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright then. But once an article is created it would be great if you could look it over to make sure it looks right. Aboutmovies 18:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OSB

message: This article is only about the OJD, a specific government agency. It is not about the Judiciary of Oregon, which would include city courts and a few justice courts and a few county courts. I guess you would even through in tribal courts. Aboutmovies (talk) 02:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the clarification, . The article is ambiguous about that, and should be clarified that the Oregon Judicial Department is a government agency and in fact, not the "official" name of the judiciary branch of government in the U.S. state of Oregon. CookieMonster755 𝚨-𝛀  03:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregon Judicial Department v. Judiciary of Oregon
Talk:Ontario Heritage Trust

message: * "The Royal Military College of Canada" on the stone wall between Fort LaSalle and Fort Sauvé, on the grounds of the Royal Military College of Canada in Kingston Ontario  
* "Fort Frederick" on the grounds of the Royal Military College of Canada in Kingston Ontario
* "Stone Frigate" in front of Stone Frigate on the grounds of the Royal Military College of Canada in Kingston Ontario
* "The Rush-Bagot Agreement" On the North East corner of General Crerar Crescent and Valour Road, on the grounds of the Royal Military College of Canada
There are nearly 1200 of these plaques, listed on the government web site. Including four, all relating to one institution, is unnecessary. If these are important, an article listing all the plaques could be made.Stearnsbrian 04:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ontario Heritage Trust Plaques
Talk:Upper West Side, Buffalo

message: I'm a little confused as to the boundary issue - isn't the area to the west of Grant Street considered Black Rock, not the Upper West Side? Also, what is the neighborhood from Richmond to Elmwood, if not part of the UWS?
76.50.21.182 04:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No article for Elmwood?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.221.166 (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elmwood Village