Talk:Parinya Charoenphol

message: Should Nong Toom be added to the List of female kickboxers?  She is a well-known public figure in Thailand and an accomplished kickboxer, but her transgender status raises an interesting question of which category she should be added to in Wikipedia. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.199.169 (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know the answer to this question. My personal belief (which has nothing to do with Wikipedia policies) is that transgendered folks should be grouped in the category of their choosing, and Nong Thoom has chosen to live as a woman. However, the regulating bodies for the sport she is competing in might have another view. She could be in a category all her own, which raises more troubling concerns for the categorists and list-makers. She has competed with male boxers, but has participated in exhibition matches with female fighters from different disciplines. – WiseKwai |  Talk | Contribs 09:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed.122.148.173.37 (talk) 15:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Nong Toom be added to the List of Female Kickboxers? 

message: Anyone know if Nong Thoom has an agent?  How does one get in contact with her?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElentariAchaea (talk • contribs) 01:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to contact her 

message: Whats with the worldwide tag anyway?  Doesnt mean a dmn thing to me and I see nothing whatsover wrong with the article other than perhaps some referencing (and the requisite facts may well be in the links anyway). (In fact I thought it was very well written.) If I come back I am going to delete the tag if there are no objections... 122.148.173.37 (talk) 16:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  worldwide tag? 

message: Could someone edit this so that it doesn't sound like its a heroic biography? For example, instead of "she realized her gender identity", write "Parinya stated that she discovered her gender identity when she was..." etc. Gabr-el 04:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit needed for style 

message: All throughout this article 'he' and 'she' are used interchangeably which is confusing and disrespectful. All instances of 'he' should be changed to 'she' even in the past tense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roseofwinter (talk • contribs) 16:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just gone through and removed all references to her as "it" for the same reason. 81.157.75.34 (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? The article says he is a kathoey. The article for kathoey says they self-identify as males, kathoey' suggests that the person self-identifies as a type of male". Additionally, "Legal recognition of kathoeys is non-existent in Thailand: even after genital reassignment surgery, they are not allowed to change their legal sex." Surely, then, he is a he? Matthewedwards :  Chat   05:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The term 'kathoey' is one that is fraught with difficulties- her interviews make it clear she identifies as a woman, and her legal status is pretty much entirely irrelevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.113.87 (talk) 00:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to 'he' should be changed to 'she' 

message: Somebody needs to semi-protect this page. The edits to change all gendered pronouns to 'he' are getting rather ridiculous. --Stealthy (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection required 

message: Before operation - the person was gender-specific - "he". After operation - "she". It is not disrespectfull to use apply both sides to biography, because biography was a change. To draw analogy, it is not disrespectfull to call "tea" as water, before water became tea. Not doing this makes the article look awkward - a young male child that is referenced as "she". 217.50.149.129 (talk) 21:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is incredibly disrespectful. Wikipedia has an established policy on this: we use the subject's current preferred pronouns throughout the article. See MOS:IDENTITY. Skyerise (talk) 21:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

text: Ah, okay, I am sorry, because I didn't know this is this complicated and did not intend to offend. Thanks for reverting and linking to the policy. 77.2.133.115 (talk) 00:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  He or she 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Parinya Charoenphol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128082513/http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/02/22/headlines/headlines_20001353.php to http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/02/22/headlines/headlines_20001353.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified