Talk:College of Europe

message: I know some who attended the College of Europe in the early 80s, who did not get a Master's degree (and did not have the option). When was the Master's degree created?
I know French students at ENA do traditionally not get a degree (just a job if they are good enough). Brigittemoew (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Masters' degree

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Helle-Thorning-Schmidt.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on College of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207013354/http://old.fdv.uni-lj.si/osebne/Debeljak.htm to http://old.fdv.uni-lj.si/osebne/Debeljak.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on College of Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://origin.rferl.org/content/college_of_europe_breeds_the_new_elite/24374133.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210103605/http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/europes-leaders-in-waiting-face-the-mess-ahead/38/ to http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/europes-leaders-in-waiting-face-the-mess-ahead/38/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This page reads like it was created by the college's marketing department and definitely doesn't seem to be objective. 114.23.234.192 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This reads like an advert for the college 

message: It seems that there is near-edit warring occurring on this article, between those who believe the scandals should be covered, and those who feel it is not representative. Either way, there is a disagreement on the neutrality of the article. Instead of warring back and forth, could there please be a discussion so either side can understand where the other is coming from, and to make it clear if one side is purposefully editing in a biased manner (either in defense of their employer/alma mater, or in attack of the institution for biased personal/ideological reasons). It is common practice for scandals to be mentioned on Wikipedia with direct reference to the parties involved, hence it has been left with the information as is for now. I don't want to be involved, so it would be good if both sides here could come to a resolution. [any advice, admins?]  Shadowssettle(talk) 14:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I take no position on either side, except to note that one side has involved someone working for the college, removing the scandal. That is a clear violation of WP:COI and that's why I've been reverting their edits. I want to be incredibly clear, though, it may still be the case that this information should be removed. It's just, it shouldn't be removed by someone with a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

text: Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm not sure where you came to that conclusion (I've seen them about everywhere), but I take your point about placement  Shadowssettle(talk) 10:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality dispute