Talk:Bilocate

message: there is a term bilocate that refers to the Catholic notion of bilocation, the page should be a disambig. page and split into the band, and the verb.
Benwetmore 04:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other definitions

message: :Image:Dysphoria.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dysphoria.jpg

message: This article is terribly written at the moment, and is wholly un-encyclopaedic. - Horatio  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.9.220 (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the writing style is not the best.  However, "unencyclopedic" doesn't take into consideration the 21 references that are supplied within the body of the article, even though they're not cited in any useful way.  I believe those are an assertion of notability sufficient to remove this article from the speedy deletion category; if someone still wishes to remove this article, I suggest that a PROD tag or an AfD process would be the way to go.  It might be more productive to properly cite the list of reviews.  Accounting4Taste:talk 16:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

text: It doesn't actually matter - the community has decided that at least one revision of this article should be kept via an AfD, so it cannot be speedied, only reverted to earlier revisions at worst. Certainly edit warring over the tag won't improve the article, that's for sure. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bilocate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090101050143/http://invisibleoranges.com:80/2008/10/sign-them-already-bilocate-deeply.html to http://invisibleoranges.com/2008/10/sign-them-already-bilocate-deeply.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208174035/http://www.metal-mayhem.co.uk:80/reviews/bilocate.shtml to http://www.metal-mayhem.co.uk/reviews/bilocate.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090409202012/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/showreview.aspx?reviewID=1501 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/BlabberMouth.Net/showreview.aspx?reviewID=1501
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bilocate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090305232407/http://www.thenational.ae/article/20081012/ONLINESPECIAL/559483816 to http://www.thenational.ae/article/20081012/ONLINESPECIAL/559483816
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified