lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Toyota Avensis

message: Was this similar to any model in Japan? I'm really confused here - I thought it was pretty much the same as the Corona of that time but with a different nose (like what was done to the Corolla sold in Europe/Australia too),l but I can't find pictures or info... --Zilog Jones 21:55, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Generation Avensis 

message: Thanks
 Ice Cold 17:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the price of Totyota Avensis?

message: At first, there were only saloon and litfback, estate was one year later. Turbodiesel engine wasn't available at first too, but after a year. I don't know, whether this information is not mentioned because of lack of knowledge, or maybe it isn't essential, so I'm not adding it. Piotrek91 18:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some missing information 

message: ie, if I buy one in Australia, was it manufactured in England??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.166.20 (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  So are these details world-wide 

message: There should be added some info about this.
Marskuzz (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You can either add the information yourself or you can put a reference on this talk page. Other editors can then modify/insert it in the article as needed.  Stepho  talk  04:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third generation facelift 

message: What sources are acceptable for power figures? According to the article the 4A-FE engine in the Avensis has 75 kW, but this source http://catalog.meca.no/CarSelect.aspx?CarReference_ID=5703&CategoryType_ID=1 states that this specific 2000 Avensis has 81 kW. I looked up several other Avensises equipped with this engine (found on the largest norwegian online car marketplace) and every one of them had 81 kW. This information is from a car parts shop which gets its information from the official norwegian car registry. Would this be a reliable source, or would I have to find a Toyota source such as a manual that came with a car? PerDaniel (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceptable sources for power figures? 

message: Does anybody know if the facelift occurred in August 2011 or January 2012? There has been edit warring on this with an anon-IP but there is no reference for either date.  Stepho  talk  02:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I found references for Jan 2012 intro and have added them to the article.  Stepho  talk  20:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011/2012 facelift
Talk:Individualism

message: This section seems more like a biased criticism of individualism than a description of the position. Is there a way to improve it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.72.169.203 (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competitive individualism 

message: The modern anti-racism movement seems very much what individualism is about. This articls should have a link to antiracism. 165.225.222.157 (talk) 17:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Isnt Individualism anti-racism?

message: The article currently reads: 
:Solipsism is the only epistemological position that, by its own postulate, is both irrefutable and yet indefensible in the same manner. 
I have no idea what this means, though it sounds like something a philosopher would say. Can we get a citation? The "solipsism" article uses neither of these terms (irrefutable, indefensible). AdamChrisR (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 01:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solipsism: irrefutable and indefensible 

message: Aren't they considered collectivist cultures? Headows of Meaven (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan/South Korea are individualist? 

message: I am a staunch individualist, but the lack of depth within the criticism section concerns me massively, as a "vital", should this not have more attention paid into it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.241.175.158 (talk) 06:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  As outlined above the criticism section
Talk:Rotary snowplow

message: Is it true that the Milwaukee Road had one or more snowplows that were powered by catenary? SpaceCaptain 21:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think so.  They had a couple F7B units (X1 and X2) for rotary power and some wedge plows (like one that is currently on static display in Harlowton), but I don't recall seeing anything about rotaries powered off the wire. Slambo (Speak) 14:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, at least one, X900212, was able to power the rotary plow drive shaft from either the overhead catenary or a following diesel unit.  In either case, it required an accompanying locomotive to push the unit.  https://milwaukeeroadarchives.com/Electrification/RotarySnowplowElectricDrive.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.191.124.173 (talk) 04:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power sources
Talk:Ancient Egypt

message: I would like to edit Egypts history ancient times because i am more experienced as i am egyptian and have knowledge about Egypt Stawberrylemo (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an improper use of the edit request template. The template is for proposing specific actionable changes. Access to edit the article is not granted on a request basis because that isn't how page protection works. Beyond that, and with respect, the quality of the writing in this request indicates a command of the language that is well-below the necessary standard to directly contribute to a current FA. If you have an edit you'd like to propose, you can place it within this section and have an experienced editor check over it. Before doing so note that Wikipedia prohibits original research. Any proposed change needs to be backed by a high-quality (i.e. academic) reliable source. There are other policies and guidelines that may need to be taken into consideration, but cross that bridge when you get to it. Mr rnddude (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2024 

message: The years in subsection titles within the "History" section contradict with our own articles of these periods. For instance, our article stated that the Middle Kingdom ranges 2134–1690 BC, while various parts of our article on the Middle Kingdom stated that it ranges from "2040 to 1782 BC", or even "c. 2055 BC–c. 1650 BC". Should we at least take a look at these periods and check their accuracy? If we cannot form a consensus on when these periods occured then it might be better to remove years in subsection titles and let the subtopic articles discuss about the nuances of each estimated period in detail. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree....drop dates use academic terms and let prose deal with time frames. Moxy🍁 15:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should years in subsection titles be removed
Talk:Olentzero

message: A good deal of this text is cut and pasted from http://www.eng.uci.edu/~pfluegl/2003.12.24.BilbaoOlentzeroTrip.php  It needs to be Wikified and restated. --Wetman 12:22, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: References!? I only find ikatz for "coal". --Error 00:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've rewritten a lot of the article and referenced it. I haven't checked out the link above yet so I've stuck to citation needed onto the text (where the stories are given) - which is why I've broadly left them for the time being, I'll check the rest out asap. Akerbeltz (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Balamb Garden

message: Balamb Garden was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was CONSENSUS NOT REACHED but there were more merge votes than delete votes; there were NO keep votes.
Not at all encyclopedic. It's just fancruft, and hardly "essential to the plot" at that. Delete. --Improv 13:56, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Al-Qaqaa weapons facility

message: ABC's KSTP
A 5 Eyewitness News crew in Iraq may have been just a door away from materials that could be used to detonate nuclear weapons. The evidence is in videotape shot by Reporter Dean Staley and Photographer Joe Caffrey at or near the Al Qaqaa munitions facility.
The video shows a cable locking a door shut. That cable is connected by a copper colored seal.
A spokesperson for the International Atomic Energy Agency told 5 Eyewitness News that seal appears to be one used by their inspectors. "In Iraq they were used when there was a concern that this could have a, what we call, dual use purpose, that there could be a nuclear weapons application." 
:Note that someone touted this as "having seen the explosives". It just shows a sealed door. Let's not get carried away.
Cut from Current Events:
* A KSTP-TV St. Paul, Minnesota television reporter embedded with U.S. 101st Airborne Division troops, displayed a videotape shot at the Al-Qaqaa ammunition dump on April 18th, 2003 clearly displaying the ammunition cache of explosives and other weapons supplies, sealed with the IAEA seals which were reported 18 months ago. MSNBC carried this evidence that the weapons cache was in place after the invasion of Iraq.
Actually, it shows only a door, sealed form the outside. It cannot show any "cache" unless they broke the seal.
I watched the news story at the KSTP website, and took notes:
* on or very near al QaQaa 
* Our crew did not enter this sealed bunker
* April 18th - "finds the weapons are not secured" (and clip suddenly ends)
I'm racking my brains trying to understand how a news crew cand "find" that weapons are not secured.
:You must not have seen the same video I did.  It's pretty unmistakable that they saw high explosives.  Look at the video here: http://kstp.com/article/stories/S3740.html?cat=1 and click the "video" link next to the dateline at the top. Nysus 02:17, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Minneapolis TV videotape
Talk:Montauk Project

message: I fear that whoever wrote this does not quite understand what dubious means. If the MP was real, it was more than a little dubious! But I suspect what was meant is that the existence of the project itself is highly doubtful, which it is. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:65C6:12C9:B6E6:A9A3 (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:   the somewhat dubious Montauk Project 

message: It should be “born in Long Island..” not “born on Long Island..”. 69.42.243.117 (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: People are born on islands. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done: see previous comment. Actualcpscm (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2023
Talk:Woodland management

message: Nice start, but it seems a bit focussed on managing of English woodlands - or, even, dare I suggest, semi-natural broadleaf southern English woodlands. The world is full of woodlands and management techniques. With such a broad title a much more general article is needed, I think, which we can then break down into different types of management, including the ones you've started on Naturenet 15:19, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: On that note, is this any different from forest management? If its to remain as focused and particular as it is, could it be the start to the Forestry in the United Kingdom article? Minnecologies (talk) 22:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Nice pic - however I've removed it. It is not particularly a machine for tree management, as it's just a mobile lifting platform for working at heights, albeit that in this instance it's used for tree management (although as it is not in action we only have the sign to tell us what it is used for). Plus this is a device for managing trees in a formal or semi-formal situation, such a roadside. You'd rarely see such a device in use in a woodland. Naturenet | Talk 11:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point of view.  It was being used near a road next to a small wooded area in a city.   Can you suggest a page where the image would be better placed? Snowman 12:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got to be Cherry picker surely? Naturenet | Talk 20:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of tree management machine
Talk:Peace walk

message: Of course Satish Kumar and his companion used ships to cross the channel and the atlantic, something I know all about myself; see Pet passport. I have changed the article but I think people can figure out for themselves that Satish did not cross water, no more than Jesus, so please do not vandalise my site--Scuiqui fox 20:52, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Peace walk]]

message: I like the idea of this page - peace walks have been going on a long time and I don't see any other general page on them on Wikipedia. I think it would improve the page to see more notable peace walks listed with information, such as the Great Peace March in 1986 and some led by Native Americans.
I added a few myself, then got to correcting grammar, such as the need for commas in some sentences, and some other sections. I generally don't like to see information in parentheses as Wiki is an encyclopedia project, not a blog. I grew up reading encyclopedias and don't recall reading a lot of information in parentheses. I also tried to find more verifiable sources, such as the walks covered by media. It improves the page to have inline citations to those verifiable sources. See what you think. 
I also think a section on how peace walks have made a concrete impact would be an improvement to the understanding of why they occur. The civil rights movement can point to how the Freedom bus rides made a great impact on effecting change, as people were horrified seeing nonviolent activists beaten by racists on the evening news. How do these walks made a difference in bringing about peace? That may be hard to find specific examples since who knows what inspires an official to make a change. But a section on pointing to potential or real impacts would be helpful. Bgbg4444 (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice idea for page, could use expanding such as including other notable walks 
Talk:4-6-4

message: Australia:
No article on this topic so far mentions the 4-6-4 tank engines put into service by the New South Wales Government Railways (Australia) in 1903-4, class S-636, weight in service 73.3 tonnes. The first 35 were bought from the UK firm of Beyer, Peacock & Coy (their favourite builders) followed by another 110 built by both British & Australian builders regularly up to 1917 [sources: NSW Steam Locomotive Data, issued by the Department of Railways, Research and Information Section, April, 1966; A Compendium of NSW Steam Locomotives, edited by A Grunbach, 1989,.]
I contend that these engines are the FIRST deliveries of new 4-6-4 tank engines in the world. The three NZ We class 4-6-4 tank engines were conversions from 4-8-0s as stated.
Germany:
The Prussian-Hessian Railways contracted with Henschel & Co for a 4-6-4 4-cylinder compound tank engine delivered in 1904 (ERFURT No. 1980, later 9051), class T 16.1. This unusual machine had driving cabs at each end and weighed 108.3 tonnes. This would appear to be the SECOND
4-6-4T type in the world. It may not have been a great success as it spent much time 'kalt abgestellt' in the depot. It was sent to France in 1919 as part of the 5,000 steam engine reparations payments levied on the German state after WW1. [Lokomotiv-Archiv Preussen, Tender lokomotiven, Band 3, A Wagner, Bechtermuenz Verlag, Stuttgart, 1996.]
France:
The third 4-6-4T engine in the world would appear to be the French NORD type already mentioned, and one of these is exhibited in the SNCF Mulhouse Museum partly sectioned.
Italy
Perhaps the Italians had a 4-6-4 express engine built about 1904 also cab forward about which I am still researching.
I contend that some of the claims already made might need revision. UK 4-6-4 tank engines followed from 1911-12 from the London, Tilbury & Southend line, the Glasgow & South-western, Lancashire & Yorkshire railway, the London, Brighton & South Coast Railway, and in Ireland.
I am still researching this topic.
220.253.64.185 05:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like good stuff! Don't forget to WP:CITE your sources when you add the information to the article, especially as this article has no references yet. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 11:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first 4-6-4 engines 

message: When people think of a 4-6-4 locomotive they are probably going to think of a big American one with a tender, maybe streamlined, not an obscure Sotuh African tank engine, so can we change the main image?2601:245:C101:9C70:929:A5EF:41DF:7F19 (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Image
Talk:James Fitzmaurice

message: The account of the flight given here is much more detailed than the one on the page dealing with the aircraft itself (Bremen (aircraft)) - should what's here be transferred to that other page? --Todowd 12:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bremen Flight 
Talk:Errick Willis

message: Canada's parliamentary website [www.parl.gc.ca] lists Willis as having been a First Nations MP.  There does not appear to be any other corroborating evidence to support this claim, however -- and the parliamentary site has been known to make mistakes on MP information.
The parliamentary guide lists Errick Willis's father, R.G. Willis, as Irish on both sides of his family.  His mother was one Ellah French, the daughter of Henry French (who appears to have been a recent arrival in Manitoba from Hastings County, Ontario).  If Errick Willis was aboriginal, it would have had to have been from his mother's side of the family -- and there doesn't appear to be any evidence leading to this conclusion.
Does anyone have information to suggest that Errick Willis's mother was aboriginal or Metis? CJCurrie 18:04, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, although it is completely unreferenced. I have assessed this as low importance as I do not feel many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of this article. Cheers, CP 21:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Well smack

message: I have put up this article in the hope that someone can add to or correct the very limited existing information on this type of fishing boat.  This is a piece of English history which has almost completely disappeared. Maybe someone somewhere has seen that pre-1920 (Faroese?) film too (I saw it in 1960/61).  Or maybe a marine archaeologist or diver on one of those underwater sites off Holland may realise what they have found. Cheers. Storye Book.
: Update: I wrote the above notice in 2004 when I started the page (which has since been moved from "Welled smack" to its present title). It's great to hear now of the Emma C. Berry in New England.  Also I did hear of someone in the south of England repairing an old smack which had long been converted to a dry boat.  No further news of a UK well smack, though.--Storye book (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Welled smack

message: I have read this article with interest as I am currently working on a 3D computer model of a fishing smack with a well. The model is based on plans from Architectura Navalis Mercatoria by Fredrik Henrik af Chapman published in 1768. 
I am uncertain of the date of the plans but Chapman studied abroad, including England, from 1752-56 and it is possible they relate to this period.  
The plans can be viewed in the archives of the Swedish National Maritime Museum.(Plate LIX No 3) 
The boat is described as "an English Fishing Smack" for flatfish. It is 38 feet in length.
JMCDavies 13:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Fishing Smack 

message: A quick Google Books search for 'livewell smack' brings up plenty of sources that are happy to call what's in these boats a livewell (live well, live-well, etc.), going back as far as the 1870s. A piped link to livewell doesn't seem inappropriate. 2001:48F8:4002:684:5969:CF6C:DB1A:3F4C (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the Livewell article does not contain the information which you found by Googling. Everything that that article says, is inappropriate for the well in a well smack. Unless you can edit the Livewell article to be appropriate for 18th to early 19th-century technology on well smacks (with citations), we cannot use that link. Storye book (talk) 08:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Livewell
File talk:Warwickshiremap 700.jpg

message: Why exactly has someone reverted to an earlier version of this map. G-Man 18:50, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well, I suppose the 1911-74 boundary is historic in the sense that it isn't the current one, but if you're going to play games with the word "historic", you should remember that the entire portion of the current City of Birmingham south of the Bournbrook, the River Rea, the Belgrave/Highgate Rd, the Sparkbrook, and the River Cole was in Worcestershire pre-1911. Likewise, large parts of the west of the City (Harborne, Handsworth, Perry Barr) were in Staffordshire - I'm not sure of the exact course of that boundary, but I understand that part of it ran along Hockley Brook. Phlogistomania 22:28, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
*Erm good point, mind you, Warwickshire's boundaries have undergone a number of revisions, so it's hard to say which is the true "historic county". G-Man 22:03, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic? 

message: This map does not show Warwickshire's "historic boundaries" in the sense that the boundary given was never the actual county boundary at any stage in history. If one is going to give Warwickshire half of Tamworth then places like Shipston-on-Stour and Yardley needs to be given to Worcestershire, the exclave of the county centred on Whitchurch noted, and so forth.
A correct map (without comparison) can be found here:  Uncantabrigian 20:28, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I had realised that, and was planning to do a new map at some point, I havn't got roud to doing it yet. There are also parts of Birmingham which used to be in Worcesterhire and Staffordshire. G-Man 21:20, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect map