Talk:Papal supremacy

message: This article is supposed to be about the Catholic dogma.  While it is appropriate to have a section discussing the views of Protestant and Orthodox Christians, it is not appropriate to turn the article into a debate about the validity of Roman Catholic claims.  This is encyclopedia, not a dialectic journal. 76.226.196.122 (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like a Debate

message: Contrary to popular opinion, Papal Supremacy is vastly different than Papal Infallibility. It is not in Roman Catholic Dogma, it gives the pope complete control over kingdoms in the Christian realm, and while not used to make important decisions for all countries, kingdoms up to Modern day had the Kings crowned by Church officials with the Pope's blessing. Thetruthbelow 23:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papal supremacy 

message: I think this article is about the same topics of Primacy of the Bishop of Rome. If it's so we can join them. --Tn4196 (talk) 05:02, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Papal Primacy and Papal Supremacy are separate concepts. Papal Primacy would be the "first among equals" approach and Papal Supremacy would be the "first without equals" approach. The Eastern Orthodox Church holds to Papal Primacy but not Supremacy. 65.124.227.202 (talk) 17:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primacy of the Bishop of Rome 

message: Please see Talk:Papal primacy#Major confusion of terms. Ergo Sum  20:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion regarding importing content from Papal primacy article 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Papal authority and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#Papal authority until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Papal authority" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Papal Authority and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#Papal Authority until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Papal Authority" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I removed a whole section called "Opposition arguments from Church Councils." Not only were they not NPOV, but they actually cited pretty much only 2 sources. One was a dude called Peter Doeswycky, a guy who has no info other than him writing about "Romanism", and the other was a paper from a pastoral conference for Lutherans. --70.24.86.150 (talk) 05:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Not because they are "fundies" as you claim, but because from what I see both authors do not seem to have academic credibility and are published by publishers which do not have any academic credibility either. Veverve (talk) 07:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Veverve. We may need to remember that Papal supremacy is an idea only of religious fundamentalists (and religious politicians) who will therefore be appropriate sources for definition of the idea, and to some extent for its in-universe development. On the other hand, historians will usually be appropriate sources for its actual history. Richard Keatinge (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed a section