lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Matkot

message: Hi, i have uploaded the emblem of the association, however i am not great with working with images.  Clearly the jpeg i created does not efficiently use the space properly. If someone could edit the image so that it does, this would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faito (talk • contribs) 06:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It took me many attempts, as i am a bit wiki-illiterate, but i finally got that picture edited and uploaded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faito (talk • contribs) 04:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emblem of the association 

message: To the person who deleted the whole article, why? Did you find evidence that the information was inaccurate? Please could you tell me what Matkot club you play at?
I suggest in accordance with wiki policy, all major changes are discussed first. Thanks. 220.235.135.50 00:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No major edits (deletions) without discussion 

message: I removed two dubious sections:
* The section about International Matkot Association. I have never heard of it, i can't find it on Google, and its Hebrew name is written with a blatant spelling mistake. Looks like a hoax to me.
* The section about "Matkot and the Zionist Psyche". It's very interesting, but completely sourceless.
Please correct me if i'm wrong. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed dubious info 

message: Why are the actual rules not covered at all in this article? Someone should definitely add them.69.141.14.51 (talk) 20:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no rules. This is just a recreational beach activity like playing catch or building a sandcastle. —Mrwojo (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay? 

message: The article indicates that the sport has "developed a moderate level of popularity outside of Israel" and is "highly popular" in Brazil and "widespread" in Italy, yet this article in Haaretz (currently the only reference in the article) includes a claim that matkot "has so far not been a big hit anywhere other than here [in Israel]". Can a source be offered to support the claims that are in the article? If the claims cannot be attribued to a reliable source, then they should be removed. -- Black Falcon (talk) 04:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  International popularity
Talk:Siniora Plan

message: Yeah, I forgot to post my reasoning. I think that in the context of condensing the Ceasefire attempts during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict page, many of the details surrounding the Siniora plan could be included, and the parts relevant to the formulation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 could be included there. Essentially the plan's importance stems from its role in that drafting, as it isn't a functional plan in and of itself. Let me know what you think, TewfikTalk 07:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does "this week" refer to?  I bet it's not the week of Sept. 13th. AnonMoos 20:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs updating

message: I just revisited this page after several months and found that an anon editor had doubled the length of this article on 25 August, inserting additional philosophical stuff in present tense, although the Siniora Plan became past history with the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 on 11 August and the article therefore had been edited into past tense on 13 August. He had also added several "aftermath" paragraphs which had nothing to do with the Siniora Plan, but were references to general statements by Fouad Siniora and other Lebanese officials about the conflict. As nothing of this had anything to do with the Siniora Plan, I've just reverted the article to the version from 20 August, when an anon user made a minor, valid correction. The revert also addresses the comment by AnonMoos above. Regards, Thomas Blomberg 23:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've reverted it back to the 20 August stage
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Consumed Crustacean

message: I have moved the discussion for User:Quill E. Coyote's oppose to this talk page. —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-16 07:21Z
#Oppose.  Sorry, but policies like the 3RR revert rule are just too important to be subverted.  Quill E. Coyote 03:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Quill E. Coyote]]'s oppose
Talk:Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction Railway

message: I have rewritten this article to give a more chronological feel to it. I have also reduced the dn section, since that is nothing to do with the B&MJR which ended its life in 1923. In any case that part is covered in the BMR article Peter Shearan 07:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yechiel Yaakov Weinberg

message: There seems to be a conflict between references on this page as to Weinberg's birth year.  One say 1878, another says 1885.  Can another reference be obtained?  --Elonka 07:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He was imprisoned in Bavaria and, most likely, had no idea what was happening in the Konzentrationslager.173.71.91.184 (talk) 01:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Core biographies/Published Lists

message: Why don't we split the alphabet? Maybe one of us could take A-J, and the other take K-Z, or something like that. We could use last name (regardless of whether it is the surname), except for people who went by one name, such as Elizabeth 1. Maurreen 07:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's probably the best way to proceed. Give me a little bit of time to do one intial pass thru to build a union list in which we can look for duplicates. --Rikurzhen 07:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Check the "output" section below. Different ways of writing the same name have resulted in the same person appearing on more than one line, and thus being under counted. (See, for example, Dante.) If we can synchronize the names between each list, I can compile a new clear output section. Suggestions? --Rikurzhen 08:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm getting tired. Don't know how much more I will be able to do tonight. But I've looked at the top 50 of four lists (not Time and Murray yet). So far, the only ones that are repeated are ones we already have on the list. So I guess we've done a pretty good job so far. Maurreen 08:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NP, later --Rikurzhen 08:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting the alphabet
Talk:Campus Martius Park

message: "The park's skating rink is designed to resemble the one at Rockefeller Center in New York City and is larger in size than the Rockefeller rink."  There is no source cited here, and no dimensions listed.  Does anyone know where this information came from, or how big the rink is?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.165.188.130 (talk) 19:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Campus Martius Ice Rink

message: The line "Before the park was recreated, the J.L. Hudson Department Store and Addition occupied the site." is factually incorrect.  Hudsons' actually sat a full block north of the park.  While the park used to be much larger, at no time did Hudson's exist on it, even when it was larger. --Criticalthinker 07:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hudson's

message: Why isn't this a separate article?145.116.9.177 (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They run togther as a combined area. Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cadillac Square Park

message: Shouldn't there be a separate article for Cadillac Square Park? At the end of this article it feels kind of tacked on. Detroit Joseph (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for Cadillac Square Park? 
Talk:Mahonia Hall

message: Does anyone know if Mahonia Hall is open to the public for tours like the white house?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Allyn (talk • contribs) 07:55, December 27, 2006
:It looks like you may be able to arrange group tours on Friday afternoons: http://www.aauwsalemor.org/item.asp?iid=3 Katr67 18:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tours

message: I e-mailed the gov's office several months ago, asking if they knew where the governors lived before Mahonia Hall. They didn't know, but were eager to hear back if I found out anything. I added some info about this that I discovered today after wandering into the North Office Building for a mocha. So "the governor slept here" might apply to several houses in the Salem area, if anyone is interested in doing more investigating. Katr67 18:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous residences
Talk:Late-night anime

message: Without setting up special antennas or tuners, viewers can only watch VHF stations, and not UHFs. (The distinction between VHF/UHF may become blurred in other parts of Japan, however.) 
: In 2000s a VHF-only TV set is an antique, and an indoor antenna are sufficient in many locations. Soredewa 11:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficult to see the UHF TV?

message: Quote: Most series are broadcasted for 1 cour [...] or 2 cour [...] With the exception of NTV programs, few titles have longer cour.
What is the intended meaning of "cour" – French for "court(yard)"! – here? -- Picapica (talk) 11:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cour=? 

message: I don't believe that the use of such time designations as "25:30" and "26:00" (for 1.30, 2.00 on the following morning) is unique to Late-night anime broadcasts. It would appear to be commonplace in Japan for "overnight" times: e.g. "Bar open 18:00 to 26:00". -- Picapica (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time format 

message: Why we can't watch anime in late night 119.2.125.133 (talk) 19:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem
Talk:Harbor City International School

message: This page is NOT the school's to use as it wishes. 90% of this article was blatantly advertising.  The other 10% was a violation of one of our most important policies, WP:BLP. Myself and another editor are trying our best to clean this up but the constant re insertion of the promo and policy violating material is really annoying.  Please stop. If you think there is material that should be added, please discuss it here rather than constantly undoing the cleanup work we are trying to do. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits 9/2016
Talk:John Perry (philosopher)

message: I would like to add the following information and link:
He attended Lincoln Southeast High School Class of 1960.
I could include the following ref:
Lincoln Southeast High School Class of 1960 50th Reunion, Kit Thompson Dimon (ed), UNL Print Services  (2010) p. 102
But I'm not sure if this is appropriate since it is not a readily available source. 
FooBar1943 (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Though "readily available" is useful "reliable" is more important an reunion books can be a bit iffy in that people exaggerate their achievements but you are not using the reunion book to show his achievements but rather that he graduated from that school.   A key point is whether the "John Perry" in the reunion book matches the "John Perry" who is a Stanford professor and subject of this entry; is that sufficiently clear in the reunion book (you could quote what it says in the reference so people can check)?  Supporting evidence is Francis Jeffry Pelletier's bio http://www.sfu.ca/~jeffpell/bio.html; he went to the same school and later worked with John Perry in academically.  Put it in with the reference you have and see whether anyone has problems. --Erp (talk) 00:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: High School

message: I recently expanded this article, but it could use expansion still, especially on the section about Perry's work. - Jaymay 08:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I think there is too much attention given to the dialogical format of A Digalogue.... This sentence in particular is particularly unnecessary.
"The format of associating different philosophical positions with different characters in a dialogue recalls David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion."
Aside from the fact that Hume's book is arbitrarily singled out here (wouldn't Plato make a more paradigmatic example?), it should be sufficient just to mention the dialogical format in passing. 
his Ph.D. in philosophy from Cornell University in 1968 under the supervision of Sydney Shoemaker.talk) 06:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dialogues

message: Since John Richard Perry the philosopher is also to some degree a linguist, there is a possibility of mistaking him for John R. Perry, former professor of Persian etc. at the University of Chicago. The latter is also an acclaimed scholar and has written e.g. for the Encyclopaedia Iranica. I don't know what's the best way to help people avoid this confusion, so I'm just mentioning it here. 88.64.225.98 (talk) 06:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Hilary and Jackie

message: I've done a search of the Times archives and also a general google search, and I have not found the letter to the Times noted in this article. Was the letter actually published? Does anyone know the reference to this? Otherwise I think this statement should be removed. Easchiff (talk) 05:44, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - the phrase "bristling" can be found in Nordlinger's review (see citations in article) - but was it actually published? Easchiff (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bristling letter? 

message: There has been a claim in this article that the lack of a French theatrical release is due to a threat of litigation by Daniel Barenboim. I can find no references that confirm this. The film is available as an imported DVD at amazon.fr. I am removing this claim from the main article, but it can be replaced if a citation is given.Easchiff (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  French release? 

message: This article, and the articles on the two du Pre women, all mention the controversies of the book and film, and how many of Jaqueline's friends were upset etc. without ever mentioning what it was they were upset about or objected to.  Can someone who knows maybe fill in a few examples?
Waynemarkstubbs (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya really.  The same omissions are at the article on de Pre.  Given that there are NO DETAILS WHATSOEVER, how are we supposed to get anything other than some friends of de Pre didn't like the book for some reason?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.106.215 (talk) 17:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

text: I'll take a stab at it; I think they didn't want to accept the affair.  Everyone that is a fan had in their minds of the great relationship between du Pre and Barenboim (which I believe it was) and didn't want her reputation sullied, or his feelings hurt. 98.67.1.142 (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  more details on the 'controversy' 

message: Can someone explain what has happened with this article, and why there appears to be no article on the book 'A Genius in the Family'.  No new comments for four years (really?) and no new entries on Amazon reviews for the same period?  My own material seems to be missing.  - Lindosland (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions? 

message: How long is Hilary and Jackie? --TMProofreader (talk) 17:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running time
Talk:Immortal Beloved (1994 film)

message: When I heard the first movement of the piano sonata, Op. 27 No. 2 I thought it was being played far too fast.  Later I bought the DVD and played director Bernard Rose's commentary.  He said that it was much faster than usual but that it was originally written that way and has gradually been played slower and slower over time.  Does anyone know if there's anything to this?  Having listened to this recording a number of times I still find it a little hurried, but now it seems like most versions are agonizingly slow.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beetfarm Louie (talk • contribs) .
::I see where you are coming from, that was the one part of the movie that stood out the most to me. It was the fastest I have heard it played. But after study it is still considered Adagio (Slow). So with that being said it probably has slowed down over time to the Largo speed (very slow). The sonata has been played by many different people but 9/10 times it is played slower than what was heard in the movie. In my opinion the best version is Alfred Brendel he is somewhat in the middle between the Largo and Adagio. I play the sonata alot and I usually play it slowly. I hope this ansered your question.--Arjun 03:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tempo of "Moonlight Sonata"
Talk:A Song to Remember

message: Why were the hands of pianist Ervin Nyíregyházi shown playing the piano, when José Iturbi actually played the music we hear?  Iturbi was well known in movies of that time, and his hands were often featured on screen.  So why was Nyíregyházi brought in at all?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 13:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why Ervin Nyíregyházi's hands?
Talk:Mr. Holland's Opus

message: Someone thought it appropriate to add a personal review of the movie.  They even personally awarded the movie 3.5 out of five stars.  Wow.  As you all know, only notable reviews belong in wikipedia.  To quote Strong Bad:  DELETED. 98.172.21.130 (talk) 08:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  User-generated Review 

message: 1. I got the idea that there needs to be a change in the plot section, making it its own section. 
2. I also plan on changing the cast section, adding character summaries to each of the characters. I plan to add a section of critical reception/review and 
3. a section discussing the financial aspects of the movie, such as how much the movie made, and how much it took to make.
4. Change the Picture  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caseyface08 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating Film Page 

message: Why is it significant that this 1995 film is in technicolor?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.28.74.115 (talk) 05:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  technicolor
Talk:Some Bizzare Records

message: There was a Some Bizzare tv show, a predecessor to Snub TV, that was shown via Nightflight on the USA Network around 1984. It was notable as the first, and only label-run, indie music program to appear on US nationwide tv. Maybe references can be found. Wwwhatsup (talk) 19:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TV show

message: I think if you're going to make a list, it should be just that - a list. The extra text looks clumsy.  If the acts are significant in some way that can be mentioned in the text above. Which, incidentally needs to be rewritten. I'm waiting for a bit more info to go in there before I attempt that, but I will have a go at it, soon. Keep adding stuff, with citations. Wwwhatsup (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And now a new, shorter artist roster has returned, sans discussion -- Foetusized (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Roster
Talk:Who's the Boss?

message: I believe that the sitcom "Charmed Lives" with fran Drescher was a spin-off of "Who's the boss?".--Locusfr 10:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  another spin-off

message: The section about the theme states at first that, "There were three versions used throughout the series' run." but then in the immediately next paragraph states, "Four full versions of this song, as well as two short versions were used during the course of the series." Which is it, 3 or 4?!?
Wynn3thd (talk) 04:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many themes? 

message: Can we find a better word than "man-hungry" to describe Mona? I think that may be a littel innappropriate.
(Ilikerad 15:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you even seen the show?21:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mona

message: I took the time to find and watch the episode where Tony jokingly tells Sam he hurt his shoulder when Ozzie Smith did a back flip into him by mistake. Why do you, Transplanted Suburbanite, keep deleting it? ChesterCharge 13:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be pretty crazy if that constituted a legit citation Transplanted suburbanite 18:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Backflip

message: On the E! True Hollywood Who's the Boss Special, Danza sounds like he was in favor of Tony and Angela getting married and how the show would show a new married couple. Yet the page says Danza was opposed. So I asked for verification for his opinion. Jhojnack (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danza's opinion of Tony/Angela marriage 

message: "The Classic TV History", about the story of "Who's the Boss?". 71.247.208.187 (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary Series
Talk:The Concept of Law

message: the 'main ideas' found in the book is found (i.e. repeated) too in the entry on HLA hart. Chensiyuan 08:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I haven't read The Concept of Law or watched YouTube videos explicating the book; but, I really like the layout of this article. The section on Hart's empirical realism was done nicely. Good job!
SpicyMemes123 (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I like this article.
Talk:Drowned in Sound Radio

message: Article seems clearly NPOV, and needs some cleanup. Kierenj 08:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean POV (having a point of view instead of a neutral point of view). But it's pointless as an article, so I merged the info into [{Drowned in Sound]]. --Dhartung | Talk 18:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Eve's Bayou

message: :Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
*
There should be a warning saying that the «plot» paragraph is giving away key parts of the story. 199.84.42.208 (talk) 03:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References to use

message: i recall director or casting agent or someone talking about finding a creole-looking/mixed race child for the lead, but why?  CISELY didn't have that look, nor either of the PARENTS.
is it just supposed to show random variation within a generation?  the diff in the kids' looks -- along with the way the parents are so cold/mean to eve in the beginning -- implied to me that cisely was a "real" daughter but eve was "illegitimate"!!
nothing of the sort followed, so why make eve so diff looking to begin with?!  and why DID the parents prefer the other 2 kids?  66.30.47.138 (talk) 09:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY red? 

message: the kids are both grossed out by them; mother is bemused that eve would find such a box of them.  yet eve's witty retort is simply that she's supposed to "help serve".  huh?  so are these the mother's indeed, and was she planning to serve them herself?
i understand they are (maybe?) a delicacy in france, but are they or are they not in this movie?  the mother's reaction does not make sense to me.  66.30.47.138 (talk) 09:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  the bees
Talk:List of Bitag episodes

message: Marikina 05:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purging

message: Marikina 14:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: Talk in english please
124.106.8.219 05:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: English Please

message: I have removed all or a majority of the fair use images on this page as their use was not in line with our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy (likely in that the use is not minimal and it is in a list or a gallery) or our Wikipedia:Non-free content guideline. Please do not re-add them without discussion. Kotepho 08:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use images
Talk:The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1956 film)

message: The film, being French, is French spoken and both Quinn and Lollobrigida speak French. All anyone has to do is watch the film at youtube to discover this. As such they also dub themselves into English. In the original everyone is speaking French. This is clear to see from the lip movements. 86.87.191.180 (talk) 01:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language