lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PAX2

message: Your 'bot created this short article with a beginning essentially as it still is:
::Paired box gene 2, also known as PAX2 is a protein which in humans is encoded by the PAX2 gene.
I think I saw similar formulations in a few other of the articles your boot created.
I'm a bit confused by this.  Is it really usual to consider "gene" and "protein" as synonyms? I thought that a "gene" in general was thought to be coding a "protein", but that would not mean that the gene and the protein are identical.
I looked at the first reference you gave.  I think this supports my impression that genes and proteines are not the same thing.  The only occurence of "protein" in the article was in the following two sentences:
::The undulated (un) mutation on mouse Chr 2, which gives rise to vertebral column defects, has been shown to be caused by a point mutation in a conserved part of the paired domain of Pax-1 (Balling et al. 1988). This mutation decreases the DNA-binding affinity and alters the DNA-binding specificity of the un Pax-1 protein.
This seems all very stright-forward. As in other parts of that article, and with other numbers in lieu of 1, "Pax-1" or "Pax-1 gene" seems to refer to the DNA coding for a protein called "Pax-1 protein". The mutation un would be a (genotypical) minor change of the coding DNA; its phenotypical effect would be that the protein for which the gene Pax-1 codes has changed properties. (In this case, the regulator Pax-1 protein coded for by the mutated Pax-1 gene would not as easily be bound to certain DNA regions as the protein coded for by an unmutated Pax-1 allele would.)
Have I misunderstood the terminology here, or was the 'bot a bit sloppy in calling "Paired box gene 2" or "PAX2" in itself a protein? JoergenB (talk) 18:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the general consensus within the WP:MCB community was that unless there was a specific need to describe the gene and protein separately (e.g., they each would have a massive amount of information, and combining them would be unwieldy), then we would have single pages that describe both the gene and protein.  They aren't synonyms of course, but the thought was that an integrated view would better inform readers.  If you want to re-open that discussion, either in general or for this gene/protein in specific, I'd suggest posting at the MCB talk page.  Best, Andrew Su (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this simultaneosly a gene and a proteine?
Talk:Phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode

message: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. While the subject seems notable, neither of the sources provided nor the auxiliary link even implies something so astounding. I'd have to say change it to "more efficient" unless a source with a number can be found. Scythe33 (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 100% efficiency?!

message: What is the point of mentioning the lifespan of yellow LEDs?  Magenta, yellow, and cyan are the primary pigments.  Red, green, and blue are the primary colors of light, and are the primary color elements of every full-color display since the color TV's introduction.  I think the author may be confused by the typical art-school "red, yellow, blue" misnomers for magenta, yellow, and cyan.
Go ahead and change it?
Also, the the life-span ratio of red/green vs blue should be sourced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.183.2 (talk) 20:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary colors

message: For reasons above, and single ref, I added tag to improve refs. Widefox (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: refs
Talk:Rocket-powered aircraft

message: The aritlce is missing information on Soviet rocket planes.  GIRD-06 (experiments began in 1932), RP-318 flew in 1939, the BI-1 few in 1942, and about a half a dozen others.  I'll try to come back sometime and fill in some information in the article.  DonPMitchell (talk) 18:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Amen! Some of this seems to be documented in the relatively recent page Soviet rocketry. JustinTime55 (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet rocket planes
Talk:Libre Society

message: I noticed that there has been a lot of clashing over the addition of the book "Libre Culture" to the Activities section. Libre Culture is a collection of essays by the authors of the Libre Manifesto: David Berry and Giles Moss. It was compiled by them and authorized to be published and given away for free by Pygmalion Books. I'm the one who originally added this item in October, when the book was released, and I am rather confused about why it has been removed. Despite the current ill will for 205.200.244.98 I think that the content is valid and I'm fairly sure you'll agree that that should come first. And the Lion (talk) 06:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has responded I will be re-adding this item. I would appreciate a reply here if anyone feels it should be removed. And the Lion (talk) 05:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition of "Libre Culture" to Activities section

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Hershey's Chocolate World

message: Can someone elaborate on a recent change about chocolate being given out during the tour ride?  That would be a pretty drastic change to the ride versus what it has been for many years.
I've reverted the edit making this claim until more information is given. Nybound (talk • contribs) 00:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chocolate Given Out During Ride

message: This comment is in regards to the image being posted by Hersheyman.  The image is inappropriate because it depicts poor rider etiquette and is rather unprofessional.  That doesn't change just because the picture has been printed in a publication.  Having fun on a slow moving ride is one thing.  Having it on display in an encyclopedia is another.  If you want to replace the image, please come up with a better one that is more fitting for an encyclopedia.  Thanks.  Nybound (talk) 16:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Appropriate use of images

message: I'd almost swear that there is still a sign at the chocolate factory indicating that the tour has been moved. I'll check. PurpleChez (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Ambulance (computer virus)

message: Arg, how did they get the tiny ASCII ambulance to appear and move? i'm trying to make a non-Viral Simulator BAT, but the ASCII Blocks aren't working right.
Maiq the liar (talk) 06:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Promises Treatment Centers

message: being my first Wikipedia article, and also knowing that promises is largely known in popular culture, knowing that both Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Charlie Sheen, Ben Affleck and numerous others have been to this  high-priced rehabilitation center I thought at least an article should be started.  I apologize if it sounds like an advertisement.  But I do not currently have the resources or the time to put in the necessary work to make it a full-fledged wiki article.  I thought starting it would be a good idea, and that other people would be able to take it from there.  It was not my intention to make it an advertisement.Tlatseg (talk) 06:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I declined the speedy deletion request, as I don't feel that the article is blatant advertising. However, it certainly needs work. I cleaned it up a bit, but the article needs expansion and additional sourcing. faithless (speak) 09:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion
Talk:Breda-SAFAT machine gun

message: Far be it from me to defend an Italian machine gun design, but the Breda-SAFAT guns were quite good and it isn't really fair to say that the gun itself was outdated because Italian aircraft of the time were designed to carry too few of them. The deficiency is on the part of the aircraft, not the guns.--172.129.32.171 (talk) 09:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated? 

message: While there are easy to verify photographs of the Breda-SAFAT mounted on Syrian StuG III tank destroyers before and during the Six Day War, I was unable to find a good looking reference link to reference in the main article. As such, I just wanted to make note of the photographs here in case my recent inclusion of Syrian service is contested in editing, and in case anyone wants photographic sources of their use.They can be viewed here,https://wwiiafterwwii.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/stugiiimount.jpghttps://wwiiafterwwii.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/syrianstug.jpg UncleBourbon (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syrian use
Talk:Nagara (drum)

message: Isn't this same as Naqareh? utcursch | talk 12:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears, from a Google search, that this drum is cylindrical like the Arabic tabl baladi or Turkish davul. Thus, its name is related to the Arabic kettledrums, but isn't the same kind of drum. Badagnani (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Why is the article called "Nagara" if it was used by the Armenians then Georgians? This was even before the Azerbaijanis even existed. The article should be called "Dhol" or "Doli" at least.
--Arzashkun (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Some names of davuls include:
*tupan (Goranian: Tupan)
*davul ()
*daul, tǎpan, tupan ()
*tapan, goč (goch) ()
*tapan ()
*tobă/dobă ()
*tabl ( or tabl baladi)
*tof ()
*daouli (),  literally meaning "drum"
*lodra, tupana, daulle ()
*dohol ()
*doli ()
*dhol ()
*towla/dowla ()
*dahol (Kurdish: dahol)Samizambak (talk) 20:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: *Böyük nağara
*Cürə nagara
*Qoltuq nağara
*Qoşa nağara
*https://vk.com/pages?oid=-36426654&p=Qoltuq_nagaraSamizambak (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Nagara (drum)

message: Does anyone have an idea if Nagara (drum), Doli (musical instrument) and Caucasian dhol might not to a certain extent cover the same topic? – Uanfala 00:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate articles?
Talk:St. Joseph Parkway

message: Tagged for POV due to "Billed as the finest boulevard system in the United States,".  Is it, said who?  References?  Altairisfartalk 08:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stanfield Organization

message: I note that there have been two recent speculative additions to the article about Monk's early life. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The information herein needs to be verifiable. This addition does not meet this standard and will not be included in the article.--Opark 77 (talk) 11:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monk

message: Doesn't Snoop need her own page at this point?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.85.70 (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with you on this, and had thought the same. Given time, I may do it myself. Most likely, someone will get to it before I can. --WWB (talk) 07:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Snoop

message: Seriously, who the hell just ruined next weeks episode for me by saying Michael Lee killed Snoop? You bastards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.223.155.40 (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because working on this stuff is time consuming and done voluntarily. It is not always possible to get it done within 7 days.--Opark 77 (talk) 00:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snoop 

message: This needs to remain an article, though possibly compressed. List of The Wire characters has been spun out wholesale to Street-level characters of The Wire, and that has been spun out wholesale to this article. The alternative is not redirection or deletion but some kind of horrid merge (including creation of a bunch of redirects for incoming links to sectioned names). ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 03:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re prod/redirection
Talk:1993 Auburn Tigers football team

message: Florida State was the consensus national champion. The NCAA's official site (http://www.ncaa.com/history/football/fbs) lists split championships, and Auburn is nowhere to be found in 1993. There is no substantiation for this claim and Auburn was ineligible for the postseason. The same exact thing happened to Ohio State in 2012, but they don't have the audacity to claim the national championship for that year because they were under sanctions. Even if you compare like opponents (Florida), which isn't a great metric, FSU beat UF in Gainesville by 12, whereas Auburn squeaked out a 3-point win at home. FSU played 2 top 3 teams and won their bowl game. Auburn didn't. We might as well start giving Utah and Boise State national titles while we're at it, although those teams would actually have better claims since they played in the postseason and weren't on Santa's naughty list. This seems like a Little Brother Syndrome issue with Alabama. 71.203.110.138 (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The NCF gave it to no less than FOUR teams that year. It's a ridiculous "selector." You might as well say Alabama won the national championship last season because I'm sure there are several people who view them as the best team last season. It's a fraud. And the site has 1993 among others under "Champions."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.110.138 (talk) 06:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop claiming the national championship.
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Seasons of YuYu Hakusho

message: The working definition of this topic is the "seasons of the YuYu Hakusho anime." Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: The topic meets current criteria perfectly well. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: All articles are featured, thus no improvements can be made. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: Barring another season of the YuYu Hakusho anime, no additions can be made. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This could possibly be expanded to a general YuYu Hakusho topic, or a general YuYu Hakusho topic could form a supertopic to this one, or a related characters subtopic could be created. List of YuYu Hakusho movies could be added to make this a topic about general video media - rst20xx (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Different topic, different scope. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The topic scope can be changed in addition nominations, so long as it's still coherent. But it's up to you! rst20xx (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions

message: Season Three was nominated for FLRC a month or so (and then quickly rescinded). I'm wondering if rescinding the FLRC was such a good thing though. The episode summaries don't look like they meet the Featured List Criteria, and definitely have to be at least 1.5x in length from what they are now, preferably doubled. An check of all of ought articles have to be done. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 04:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a busy guy, relax. I've been intending to come back to some of my older FLCs for a while. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 10:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode summary improvements
Talk:Patricia Ellis

message: Patrick Ellis vs. Patricia Ellis 2600:2B00:7A10:900:BDE6:B30:4CE7:13D8 (talk) 04:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it 65.128.189.215 (talk) 02:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect photo
Talk:Marie Chouinard

message: I donno how to add tags and such, but this reads like it was written by her publicist as of 12 May 2012  96.50.10.234 (talk) 11:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Foutanké

message: Fleuve redirects here, but :sv:Fleuvehäst and :sv:Foutahäst indicate they are separate breeds. Should Fleuve be un-redirected? Plrk (talk) 14:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so; we have too little on any of them and one is derived from the other.  Montanabw(talk) 07:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done – please see Fleuve and M'Bayar. There's not much to say about this one, though; the sources seem to think it's a hybrid, not a breed as such. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me.  Montanabw(talk) 23:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The same as fleuve?
Category talk:Factitious disorders

message: The people categorized in this category need to be removed; I'm posting this note to give some notice so that if it's essential they have a category relationship (other than the link in their articles to this topic) that a new and appropriate category be established (e.g., "People with factitious disorders"). I can't assess whether it's an appropriate category or not, so I'm not going to create it. --Lquilter (talk) 08:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, but if the article on the person details a case of factitious disorder, they can be listed. a better category would be :Category:Victims of factitious disorder for the targets of the disorder.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:20, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: People are not disorders.
Talk:Harvest Moon DS: Sunshine Islands

message: Photo/image/scan of characters, or screenshots.
M.natsuko.s (talk) 09:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: The information from Harvest Moon: Shining Sun and Friends should be merged here, because this is the only official title of the game, shining sun and friends is only a literal meaning and per WP:VG project's manual of style the japanese title should be used. Salavat (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and merged the articles. Salavat (talk) 02:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: It seems strange. Island of Happiness, before we knew that was the English title, had the page name "The Island Grows With You" (or one of the literal translations of the title). It looks better for it to be in English. Plus, shouldn't the article name at least be called Harvest Moon: Shining Sun & Friends?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.116.65 (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sunshine/Shining Sun & Friends!
Talk:Saucisson (pyrotechnics)

message: Saucisson is, in fact, the French word for sausage. I suggest that this page be changed to refer to that, seeing as the French have a varied sausage-making tradition.--81.206.214.43 (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that this is the English language Wikipedia, where we name articles in English. In English,  saucisson is a military engineering term. If you want to write an article on French sausage making, (or rather, expand the Sausage#France section), that would be an excellent thing, but the appropriate article title would be something like French sausage or Sausage-making in France. (Don't forget to include boudin and rosette de Lyon.) -- 203.20.101.203 (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Oh, and you're not quite right, anyway; the French word for sausage is saucisse. Saucisson is a particular type. -- 203.20.101.203 (talk) 23:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sausage 

message: Does this term have any modern use with French sappers for what's also described as either a bangalore torpedo, or a MCLC like Giant Viper?  Andy Dingley (talk) 10:04, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bangalore torpedoes?
Talk:John Henry Lake

message: This photo from Swartwout Memorial Cemetery, Hudson NY, is the grave of a firefighter named John H. Lake, whose Staten Island residence and 1877 birth year both match the Olympic cyclist. Can anyone confirm if these are the same person? If so, then we can update the article text & infobox, with 1954 for his death year. —173.68.139.31 (talk) 06:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death year 1954?
Category talk:Terrorism in Northern Ireland

message: There are a couple current CFD discussions that people may be interested in. They concern the intersection of religious and nationalist terrorism. Please see these 2 discussions linked below. One is above the other on the same page.  
*Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 November 4#Category:Palestinian terrorism
*Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 November 4#Category:Nationalist terrorism --Timeshifter (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFD discussions
Talk:Georgia Township Act

message: * The section on annexing is confusing. [url=http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2007_08/fulltext/sb89.htm]The bill[/url] states "(2) A description of the area to be included in the township which shall not include any area that is a part of an active, incorporated municipality in the State of Georgia and which shall be comprised of a single, contiguous geographical area containing at least 500 acres, containing an average resident population density of at least 200 persons per square mile, and in which at least 10 percent of the total geographical area is used or is zoned for purposes other than residential uses;". However, the Wikipedia article states "A referendum would also be required, as well for the township to be annexed by a municipality.". Should that instead read, "Additionally, a referendum would also be required for the township to be annexed by a municipality." Netdragon (talk) 09:45, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Discography of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars

message: There! how is it? I hope I didn't break any rules, did I? Keiji Dragon (talk) 09:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you break any rules? Quite the opposite. You were BOLD! Good job. Taric25 (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created page 

message: Now who's bold? LOL. J/k. By the way, we need and infobox and tracklist for the arranged tracks. Taric25 (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underconstruction 

message: Unless someone explains to me how this is notable, I'll nominate it for AFD. -Karaku (talk) 01:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual topic is far from notable, but how do we usually handle soundtracks? Are they just one of the things that we split just because, or do we either cover them in the main article or not at all? TTN (talk) 01:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 

message: I nominated this for AfD due to lack of notability. -Karaku (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD
Talk:Shane Sutton

message: I don't really follow cycling, so excuse me if this is a silly question, but: why "Palmarés" as a heading? Is there any reason why an English word shouldn't be used there? In general English (as I said, I'm not a cycling aficionado) we never use the word "Palmarés". 86.158.191.125 (talk) 23:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palmarés?