Talk:Bill Farmer

message: Why is this template here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.246.16 (talk) 15:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-canon Star Wars

message: In this edit I removed a large amount of unsourced, non-notable "additional voices" roles from the article on the basis that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is policy. We are not IMDb, which is where this trivial content presumably belongs. There is a link at the bottom of the article to his IMDb page, where interested readers can learn more. Our duty here is to present a general overview of a subject, not to catalog every aspect of the person's life. And, again, it was all unsourced  anyway. Please note that per WP:BURDEN, which is Wikipedia policy, the onus would be on anyone restoring the content to find reliable sources, but per WP:V, . Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my re-search I've been looking at, it said he was in those films. http://www.toonhouseinc.com/about/ FrozenFan2 (talk) 03:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm assuming you didn't read any of my comment or the links that I pointed to, or the bright green quoted text "Verifiability doesn't guarantee inclusion"? If you're going to disagree, you're going to need to address the points raised, not just "oh, well this source says that he provided non-notable roles in a bunch of movies", and then move on. The fact that the content is unsourced is only part of the problem. The indiscriminate nature of the content is the other significant part of the problem, and the "We are not IMDb" part is another aspect. What might make more sense is to summarize his non-notable roles in prose the way the blog does. "Farmer has performed voices for ancillary characters in over NNN movies including (maybe 5 or so notable  major films). Since you may not be thinking of the grander picture because of your lack of experience here, these indiscriminate lists just invite more cruft and more unsourced, and dubious roles. We should be focused on roles that are verifiable, i.e. significant named roles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

text: And I agree with you too, i won;t add them back again. FrozenFan2 (talk) 13:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

text:  re:  Without any community policy contrary to WP:INDISCRIMINATE, or more likely, a local Biog/Film/TV guideline that supercedes the existing policy, I could as simply counter-argue "yes it does" and re-point to my "We are not IMDb" argument. If the roles are significant, there would presumably be names and context, and I neither see anywhere in MOS:TV or MOS:FILM that gives weight to the inclusion of "Additional voices" nor do I notice any guideline that suggests we are here to catalog every role a subject has performed. In my experience, the people who tend to be most gung-ho about these inclusions are fans who mistakenly think Wikipedia should be a mirror for IMDb. We are supposed to summarize the most notable aspects of notable subjects. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:INDISCRIMINATE does not apply here. In my personal experience, filmography sections (or pages if split off from bio article) give comprehensive listings of reliably sourced roles. However, to be fair, "additional voices" is often included along with named roles in shows. It could come off as incomplete to not include all roles. "We are not IMDb" isn't much of a point since their listings aren't always accurate. This concept is probably worth bringing up on the WikiProjects for Television, film, and actors. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional voices 

message: I've been looking at the history of edits on this page, and I notice an IP user was adding unsourced roles in the article. Is this the best time if we should lock/protect the page so no edit war won't happen?, and so the IP user won't keep on vandalizing the page over and over? FrozenFan2 (talk) 23:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We should only protect the page if the IP keeps hopping or if multiple IPs are being used. The IP in question has been blocked. If they persist, we can block them for longer. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: IP user

message: Since we already know he did some live-action acting work in the 80's and 90's, RoboCop and Pumpkin Man. Should we add "Actor" in his occupation section in the info box? even though he hasn't done live-action acting work on screen for decades now, and he mostly does voice acting work. Should we add that, or maybe it's not important at all. FrozenFan2 (talk) 02:53, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the roles aren't even starring roles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

text: It's a good question though. Most voice actors have had stage and on-screen roles in their career. If he was primarily known for his work on-screen like with Mark Hamill, David Faustino and Wil Wheaton, or had a sizable roles in live-action shows like with Kevin Michael Richardson.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AngusWOOF (talk • contribs) 
Really!?!, I thought my question wasn't that great. But I guess it is a good question though. FrozenFan2 (talk) 17:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Actor in occupation section

message: We need to be vigilant about the inclusion of unsourced and trivial content in this article. There has been an IP-hopping vandal who continues to submit trivial and likely hoax content to this article, like here or here or here. The nature of these additions, non-notable roles like Soldier #3, Bug #3 is problematic because verification is difficult. I think we should revert unsourced content on sight, not just from IPs, and we should focus on notable roles. Wikipedia is not IMDb. The behavior is reminiscent of LTA "Voice Cast Vandal". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone who is adding unsourced info like this should not be asking others about page protection. MarnetteD|Talk 00:26, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Your constant ignoring Wikipedia editing policies and guidelines is getting on everyone's nerves. Wikipedia is not your playground. MarnetteD|Talk 03:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

text: An accusation like that requires proof - oh and it does not belong on this talk page. MarnetteD|Talk 03:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

text: On Wikipedia there are not "rights", but "privileges." Which can be revoked by those abusing those privileges. Like doing sockpuppetry. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 22:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Those games are missing in his filmography, he voiced Goofy in those games. in the articles Wayne Allwine, Russi Taylor and Tony Anselmo they are credited in those games according to there filmography section and Bill Farmer is the only article that's missing those games, even Behind the Voice Actors.com say's he was in those games and voiced Goofy in them. Even admin Cyphoidbomb says we only stick with his notable roles credits he was in, not just addtional voices. So farther more, those games are still notable. And Goofy "IS" in those games too. So shouldn't we leave them in there in the filmography game section? Because he did do Goofy's voice in those games. 73.234.94.89 (talk) 23:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Any info entered needs to be sourced. MarnetteD|Talk 23:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

text: And once you add reliable sources to back that up, the info can stay. Until then, it gets removed. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 23:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

text: Additionally, Wikipedia is not IMDb. We're not here to catalog everything that the subject did, only the most important stuff. Some of the more popular voice actors work a lot—there's simply no practical way (or reason) to include every job they've had. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Disney Sports games and Disney's Party in filmography

message: Since we already know he's married and has one kid named Austin as well. Should there be a Personal life section about his wife and his son as well, I've been looking at different articles of "actors" and "actresses" and they all have a Personal life section in the article. Should we add one for this article? 71.232.184.131 (talk) 22:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the only source for that information is a dead link, I have removed it from the infobox. If you can find reliable sources, then it can be added back. Until then, nothing about the unreferenced spouse or children. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 23:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal life information section

message: I just noticed a mistake down below the filmography section. The Spirit of Mickey and Wack Adventures of Ronald McDonald info are listed in the wrong section, they are not television shows. They are direct-to-video movies, if someone can do me a favor and help fix this mistake please. 2600:1000:B077:3537:15E8:AECB:3449:B3FB (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 19:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The Spirit of Mickey & Wacky Adventures of Ronald McDonald

message: I just noticed a mistake down below the filmography section. The Spirit of Mickey and Wack Adventures of Ronald McDonald info are listed in the wrong section, they are not television shows. They are direct-to-video movies, if someone can do me a favor and help fix this mistake please, and move them to the direct to video section. 2600:1000:B03D:6062:6091:A105:E2EB:744 (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sro23 (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2017 

message: There "IS" actual proof that Farner voiced Pluto in Roster Racers. He's listed in the credits of the show and there's more info online. 2600:1000:B07E:CDFA:DDAA:4D29:A321:8FA0 (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pluto "Proof"