Talk:ASCOD

message: A minor change: the article states ASCOD IFV can transport 3 crew plus 7 troopers but it carries, actually, 8 soldiers.
References:
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/ascod/
http://www.doppeladler.com/oebh/kette/ulan.htm
http://www.deagel.com/Tracked-Armored-Fighting-Vehicles/ASCOD_a000405001.aspx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.129.43.0 (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew Specs 

message: There is no section on the design of the vehicle, ie detailing where the power pack, gearbox, or drive sprockets are located, nor detailing the type of infantry door/ramp.   Perhaps someone in the know could add a Design section to better describe the vehicle itself.FreeFlow99 (talk) 10:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/projects/ascod/
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on ASCOD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131024113307/http://www.revistatenea.es/revistaatenea/revista/PDF/documentos/Documento_1026.pdf to http://www.revistatenea.es/revistaatenea/revista/PDF/documentos/Documento_1026.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.janes.com/article/71050/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bvv.cz/en/idet/news2/general-dynamics-european-land-systems/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The text under the picture showing the Spanish version says something about ERA. Are you sure? That doesn't look to me like explosive tiles, just rather thin steel plates that are mounted with an air gap above the main armor to disturb projeciles and jets of shaped charges so they can't hit the main armor optimally anymore. The Austrian one has the same principle, just different plating. Explosive tiles of ERA would have to be considerably thicker to carry enough explosive mass to have an effect (see the tiles on a T-72B or T90 or M1A2-TUSK, or the SPz Puma with level C armor modules), so at least a few centimeters, while I see merely one centimeter if at all on the picture. Maybe someone with enough knowledge can say something about that.--91.41.39.190 (talk) 05:05, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizarro 

message: Some over-excited Philippines military fans are trying to labeled Sabrah ASCOD 2 Light Tank as "Medium Main Battle Tank (MMBT)". Sabrah ASCOD 2 clearly mentioned as Light Tanks by the manufacturer and no such term "MMBT" exists in military classification. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 20:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sabrah ASCOD 2"  is a light tank not a "Medium Main Battle Tank (MMBT)". 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion