Talk:Characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess

message: Flamewar between one editor and fans. One side is telling the other the rules about Wiki and they're ignoring it with blah blah blah whine whine blah.
This is embarrassing. 
Just some general information about what the LoZ thinks of romance in the franchise:
Club Nintendo interview, translated, thus there is no 'fresh' original version for you to Google:
''
    Interviewer: We have received several emails in which our readers ask: Will Zelda and Link ever be involved [romantically]? [laughs] I’m sorry, but we had to ask.
    Eiji Aonuma: [laughs] Good question. Well, as you already know, we are now dealing with a teenage Link, and as you know, teenagers are very emotional beings, so there are definitely possibilities of seeing Link showing his feelings towards the princess. But honestly, we don’t know what the future holds.
    Interviewer Will we see a charming and affectionate romance [between Link and] the princess?
    Eiji Aonuma: Well, we’re creating an adolescent storyline and we try to present it how it should be; in fact, if you played it – or will play it – you’ll notice that the way Link holds the sword is much cooler than how he used to do it. Link will now do things in a way that will make him look more confident and liberated. And yes, it’s true that teenagers have these relationships — and we would love if it could happen with the princess – but I can’t talk about anything yet.  
Interviewer: Does Link have a girlfriend?
    Miyamoto: If it was Princess Zelda, it would be great. However, this time Navi [the fairy] is jealous of Zelda. So within the story, Navi feels something for Link.
These are general knowledge interviews most people have read so I'm not going to source all of them. Especially since none of them are going on the article. These are things you need to keep in mind when debating this fanship edit war that really pleases no one, not even the reader. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone unlock this article? 

message: to me llia has a striking resemblance to saria. but without the green colored hair. If many believe so, shouldn't we add that to her description so people can know who she is when they actually play the game. i could understand why we shouldn't add it though, so its ok if you feel we cant allow it. Haseo445 (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that would be original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  llia's resemblance 

message: Shouldnt they each still get their pharagraph of info, and still have the link to the main article? --Blake (talk) 01:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? The information is already covered in the linked articles, so to repeat any such information here would be redundant. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 01:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link, Ganon, and Zelda 

message: I believe this version of the Midna article, User:New Age Retro Hippie/Midna, should be its own article. It has both sections required to form its own article, and it's somewhat well-written. It may have been merged once, but I believe it was merged for lack of notability, not the character itself being unworthy of being separate. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. I think we should be eventualy making a main List of characters in The Legend of Zelda series. Not only reoccuring characters, but the main notable characters for each game. It would include the Villains for each game, Link's family (his uncle, sister, grandma, etc), reoccurring characters, etc. Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I had that idea, but a little stricter; for example, Zant would only be included if he had reception and/or creation info. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the main characters should automatically be able to be on the list. Sure, Zant might not be notable, but thats why they dont have a real article. Its the "Minor characters" and "Reoccurring characters" that will need stricter rules. I mean if someone argues "Why isn't Valoo on the list?" they would understand "Because he was only a minor character in WW." But you cant make that argument about somebody like Zant. He was the main antagonist besides Ganon. Blake (Talk·Edits) 01:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, I would prefer that we focus on characters with reception or creation. This is a bit stricter than if it were a single game list, as not every major character in the game should need reception/creation as long as most do. However, as a list that encompasses more than a dozen games, there will be disputes if we set in-universe reasonings for inclusion, with people arguing that Kafei warrants inclusion because he has the most notable sidequest in MM. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 02:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Midna out?