Talk:The Great American Bash

message: :It is more or less confirmed that Batista is returing for the Great American Bash. And there was a poster of him up there a few days ago, so I say keep it. Cause a LOT of poster's get shown month or 2 ahead of time. Can't be torrie agian cause she's on RAW. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris2038win (talk • contribs) 18:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus, a commercial advertising Batista vs. Mark Henry at the GAB was leaked earlier this week, effectively confirming the match. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.84.17.140 (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like that poster back, I can't find it anywhere.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.14.40.145 (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: for the unteenth time: -- Kings bibby win 06:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poster 

message: There is video showcasing this match on WWE.com. So do you think it's official since it's coming from the company itself and add it? Perry 23:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the thing is that while you saw it, the rest of the country didn't. WWE deliberately releases its commercials and promos on future events, spoiling the outcomes of matches and whatnot, to the local media. This is stupidly done to attract the interest of fans in that local area. The same thing happened with the Vengeance DX promo. That promo spoiled the return of the DX at Vengeance as it was released roughly 2 months before Vengeance. Another thing is Wikipedia Policy which forbids the addition of spoilers as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. So please do not post spoilers until they are officially announced on either Raw, SmackDown!, and ECW or WWE.com. Thank you. 3bulletproof16 17:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batista vs Mark Henry 

message: This has been confirmed see external link.User:Killswitch Engage
Please do not erase the World Title Match as it has been confirmed on WWE.com as shown in the external link i addedUser:Killswitch Engage
:Its cool, as long as it's legit and comes form an official source (Raw, SD!, ECW, WWE.com etc.) Just remember that Wikipedia is absolutely no place for fan rumors, gossip, spoilers, and other nonsense. If you could help me remind newcomers about the Crystal Ball Policy I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. --3bulletproof16 06:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article can be Semi-Protected by an admin. Semi-Protection keeps any IP Address and newly registered Users from editing the page. But it's useless now since SmackDown! airs tomorrow.--3bulletproof16 23:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: World Title Match

message: On Smackdown (to be aired 7/7/06), Theodore Long will announce a triple threat match for the great american bash and it will be bobby lashley defending the u.s title against william regal and finlay.
:That is a spoiler. We do not post spoilers. Marks might wonder how people know this and assume you work for WWE or something. If he is going to do it, wait until he says it on Friday.--Yugioh73036 15:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it means it hasn't happened yet, but it also wasn't announced yet. That's what I meant by a spoiler.--Yugioh73036 05:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you guys just use spoiler warnings, if the information is reliably sourced? That's what they're for. Mak (talk) 23:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States Championship 

message: I think the comment about this having the most last minute changes should be removed. That is just speculation since we don't know what last minute changes might have occured at other WWE PPV's. TJ Spyke 21:03, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Minute Changes 

message: Reverted the trivia section again. Trivia sections are really bad form for a number of reasons. If it's significant, mention it naturally as prose in the article. See Wikipedia:Trivia for an essay about this. --Jtalledo (talk) 18:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Trivia, notes, miscellaneous, they're different words describing the same kind of section. Lists get really out of hand. The info is best left in the context of the other sections. --Jtalledo (talk) 18:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 

message: Has anyone noticed that it was the great american bash, the US Title woz on the Line and it woz beetween Finlay who is irish and Regal who is english - Sion
::yeah... weird... but the match was supposed to include Lashley who's American--Andresg770 21:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has anyone noticed 

message: In the second Great American Bash, in the first match there is a link to the Steve Regal name and it's linked to Darren Matthews more commonly known as Lord Steven Regal or William Regal in WWE. But that is wrong as he didn't show up in the states until 1992. So it should be linked to the correct Steve Regal. This one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Regal
As I don't know how to do it, i'm hoping somebody can fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.201.207 (talk • contribs) 
Took care of it for you. TJ Spyke 23:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link 

message: Does anyone know of the confirmed venue for the Great American Bash in 2007? Gerweck.net says it is in Washington D.C but this site says Hershey Pennsylvania.Jayorz12 19:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen a few site "reporting" that WWE announced DC as the venue, but neither the main WWE site nor the WWE's corporate website say anything about it. I have no problem with it being change IF there is proof that WWE announces it, which I have not seen any proof of. TJ Spyke 19:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked on the Giant Center and the Verizon Centers websites and their is no mention of it. There event calendars only go up to March. So there is no way to confirm or deny either venue.Jayorz12 20:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Venue

message: What is going on with gab 2007 this year wikipedia reported that the ppv was not happen to do conflicting schedules and if you watched One Night Stand they have already started promos for Summerslam 2007!! so what is the deal is gab actually taking place this year??Deadman lastride666 17:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great American Bash 2007 

message: is the 2007 poster with rey mysterio on it real?
add a link for us to see
:Click on the picture. The pictures page has the source. Yes, it is real. Lrrr IV 20:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  poster 

message: Why don't "we" move the title from The Great American Bash to WWE The Great American Bash, to match the others Pay Per Views of the WWE?
"We" should see the example given by the Pay Per View WWE One Night Stand. Before was called ECW One Night Stand, but now it's WWE One Night Stand.
It is because it was held by other wrestling promotions in the past? 14:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha ha ha, you're really funny...Cheat2win 17:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move "The Great American Bash" to "WWE The Great American Bash" 

message: Rey on the poster? Does that mean he'll be back in time for the event?--  Hornetman16  21:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't know. The poster really doesn't mean much though, Kane was on the Judgment Day 2007 poster buy only wrestled a dark match. TJ Spyke 23:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was sitll apart of it though!--  Hornetman16  03:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POster 4 '07 

message: on wwe.com there is no tv show link to TGAB. So how can we comfirm what matchs are happining?Mt 1994 06:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For now, all we can do is rely on TV announcements. They didn't announce any matches at the ECW/SD tapings though, so we don't have to worry for at least a few more days. TJ Spyke 00:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The rules as set out by the wrestling wikiproject state that it has to be on US Televison so that would mean we would have to wait for Smackdown to air on Friday unless they are on the main website earlier. In short, the matches mentioned cannont be added now. --67.68.153.61 04:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NO LINK

message: Someone put Edge vs. Kane, and it hasn't aired yet nor is it on WWE.com. I'm going to erase it. Virakhvar321 06:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless, only 1 match should be listed right now (the Cena/Lashley match). TJ Spyke 23:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know your checking TJ, but Styles said in the first cutaway to him and Tazz that Nitro would be defending the title "in less than 3 weeks", and I'm very certain he said GAB, too. John cena123 02:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I just went back and checked it. I put it back in. TJ Spyke 02:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Um, both were added right after they were announced. I suggest you check the article first, but thanks for pointing it out here and trying to help (so many IPs only vandalize). TJ Spyke 21:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Match Adding 2007

message: Rey Mysterio was going to return on Smackdown! this week, but do to speculations of steroids, he was nixed from the show. I believe Rey was supposed to be Edge's "surpride Cutting Edge guest", and instead they substituded him with Kane. So probably, Kane will lose the title match at the bash Lex94 15:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) where's your source? (2) no speculation. --Dave. 15:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: No, I'd say you need the police confirmation as the source (or a report detailing it from a reputable independent source), as far as the "facts" are concerned about his receiving steroids. I don't think there's a verifiable source for Rey being cut from the show other than WWE itself (simply because it's only WWE that can say what they were planning to do in the first place). Certainly you can't claim that Kane will lose - that's pure speculation.--Dave. 16:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It should also be noted at the last PPV Johnny Nitro won the ECW Cahmpionship match and was only announced as Benoit's replacement minuites before the match began. This means that Kane being a late replacement does not necesasarly mean that he will lose the match. --67.71.79.147 21:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How can Kane be a replacement for a match that hasn't even been announced? The only announced matches so far are the WWE and ECW Title matches. Also, it's alreay noted in the Vengeance article that Nitro was a replacement for Benoit. TJ Spyke 21:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I sould have been more clear. I should have said if Kane was replacing Mysterio to clearify that I was refering to the hypothetical senerio mentioned by Lex94. I also wanted Nitro's noted as a counter to the claim made bt Lex94 that Kane would be likely to lose if he was a replacement for Mysterio and not becasue I didn't think it was mentioned in the Vengeance article. --67.68.154.204 05:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thanks for clearing that up. TJ Spyke 06:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

text: You do know that those are just rumors? I wouldn't put too much faith in what these "news" sites say (hell, i've never even heard of this site). To clarify, wrestlingattitude.com has a rumor that Mysterio will wrestle on RAW this Monday (sorry, but I hate when people post rumors and act like they are official or anything like that, it makes it so casual readers will think it's true). TJ Spyke 06:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if this true, Kane is scheduled to fight Edge for the World Hevyweight Championship at the GAB, so that makes it more irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kings bibby win (talk • contribs) 
June 9th was a month ago. 76.110.82.251 15:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rey Rey banned 

message: I have a source (http://pic4.piczo.com/wwe-ecw14/?g=37660647&cr=4) that says that Edge will be facing kane for the world title, and that Batista will VS Khali. Anyone heard this? BobafettH23 03:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was revealed at the SmackDown! tapings to be aired this Friday. Please do not post spoilers. --Aaru Bui DII 03:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's refreshing to see someone not just add them and constantly revert back after it's reverted. Thank you. Gavyn Sykes 04:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it? I find it highley annoying. -- Kings bibby win 08:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You find it annoying that he posted to inquire if it should be added or not?Gavyn Sykes 16:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I read it wrong Gavyn. -- Kings bibby win 08:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kane VS Edge? and Batista VS Khali?

message: I don't know why someone keeps editing this, but watch SmackDown July 6th, 2007. They did announce Lost Highway as the official theme. BBoy 01:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAB 2007 theme IS "Lost Highway" by Bon Jovi 

message: Thats not Torrie is it? I thought it was Lillian Garcia at first. Could be wrong though.
88.106.47.252 18:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 Promotional Poster 

message: Has Candice Michelle vs. Melina been announced for GAB or not yet?70.240.103.23 04:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's Championship 2007 

message: According to WWE.com, the weekly poll states that John Cena vs Bobby Lashley poll is the closest in Poll history on WWE.com. Now I know it's not notable enough to put in the article, but do we put it in the trivia section for credibility? -- Kings bibby win 08:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say not. And not sure how it would improve credibility in any case.--Dave. 09:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Credibility towards WWE.com. -- Kings bibby win 20:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a poll (and one that we can't tell if it's fixed or not). Not really notable in my opinion. Lrrr IV 01:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with the above poster entirely. WWE.com tends to fix all of their polls, or it would seem so, there's no evidence. Gavyn Sykes 01:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cena, Lashley WWE.com 

message: MVP defending the US Title against Matt Hardy has been added to the Great American Bash PPV. Credit: PWInsider.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.8.78 (talk • contribs) 
:Actually, credit goes to wwe.com since they announced the match. The match was added earlier today after WWE announced the match, please check the article first. Lrrr IV 02:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Title Match Added 

message: "Lost Highway" will NOT be the theme of the Great American Bash. It was announced as the theme, but things have changed. A replacement theme has not yet been made official. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.158.130 (talk • contribs) 
:source?--Dave. 15:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? As of now, Lost Highway IS the official theme song, as announced by WWE. Lrrr IV 06:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It wasn't there when I posted my comment. Lrrr IV 01:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 GAB Theme Song 

message: Is their anyway we can put a pre-empt block on all of our PPV's so we can eliminate vandalism from IP's? -- Kings bibby win 19:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. People have tried it before, but blocks can be be used as a pre-emptive measure. Unfortunately the posters has to be vandalized before it can be protected. Lrrr IV 04:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If we get a Admin, than can we do it? -- Kings bibby win 05:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Only if the Admin was willing to violate Wikipedia policy. Gavyn Sykes 14:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is their any "wrestling friendly" admin thats willing to do that? TJSpyke is not an administrator, but if he was, maybe he can? -- Kings bibby win 22:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh, he had mentioned that to me. -- Kings bibby win 20:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-Emp

message: Does anyone know if Rey Mysterio is still going to be wrestling at the Bash? Because if he isn't, wouldn't the poster have to be changed? The thing that would make sense is Rey VS Chavo for Cruiserweight, but it seems odd that no match has been announced even though they're hyping his return. Mjtwh 20:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The poster is just for that, promotional purposes. Rey is expected to return to action soon though. Kane was on the Judgment Day 2007 poster, but only appeared in a dark match. Chuck Quizmo 01:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I strongly agree because that's what Chavo did at No Way Out, and that would be sweet payback Mjtwh 15:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rey?

message: It was just announced that Umaga will defend the title at the GAB. Can someone add "Umaga vs. TBD"? He will face the winner of a Four-Way match on RAW that is happening now. Chuck Quizmo 01:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IC Title match 

message: Should we mention that Edge was scheduled to compete against Kane for the World Heavyweight Championship? I mean, seeing as it was already scheduled (i.e. officially noted on the WWE.com's GAB page), and seeing as we noted that Nitro replaced Benoit at Vengeance, it seems appropriate. Thoughts? A-Thousand-Lies 02:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it should be mentioned. The Edge/Kane match has been totally scrapped and not just changed, Khali will face either Kane or Batista. Chuck Quizmo 20:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHC match 

message: Should it be moved to the bottom of the list. Seeing as the matches are going in order, this match was technically the last announced as it isn't the original match seeing as Edge dropped the belt. Granted it's for the same belt. What you think?
:Agreed, this is a different match since they are even having a #1 contenders match this week. Also, it should say "The Great Khali vs. TBD", rather than listing both possible opponents. I can't do it myself because it says I can't edit the page yet. Chuck Quizmo 20:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Friday. Cheers, The Hybrid 13:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Title Match 

message: This article is getting quite large.  Should we split it up into 3 articles, one for each company?  18 PPV's on one page is a lot.  DrWarpMind 00:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?

message: The match at The Great American Bash 2006 was originally supposed to be Super Crazy vs. Psicosis, not Crazy challenging Helms. Trust me, I have the official shirt from the event, and it reads Crazy vs. Psicosis NOT Helms vs. Crazy. Even if the rumors of Helms vs. Crazy are true, you should definitely include something about plans for Crazy vs. Psicosis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.214.183.197 (talk) 06:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was wwe.com itself that originally announced "Super Crazy vs. Gregory Helms", so it wasn't just a rumor. TJ Spyke 00:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 Bash: Super Crazy vs. Psicosis

message: Isn't kind of weird that Super Crazy, Bobby Lashley, and The Great Kahli were suppose to wrestle but all had liver problems? Not to mention Matt Hardy who was suppose to wrestle but was injured.76.110.82.251 15:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 Bash cursed? 

message: :Image:GAB 90.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 90.jpg

message: :Image:GAB 91.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 91.JPG

message: :Image:GAB 92.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 92.jpg

message: :Image:GAB 95.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 95.jpg

message: :Image:GAB 96.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 96.JPG

message: :Image:GAB 97.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 97.jpg

message: :Image:GAB 98.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:GAB 98.JPG

message: Judging by the above conversation, the reason for the current WWE The Great American Bash is because this article had become too large so it was split off. Since that time myself and others have expanded all the pay-per-view events and broken them out onto their own pages. The rationale for the original split really doesn't apply anymore. This page currently only houses 3 years of events (1 closed circuit and 2 tours), as opposed to 18 (14 here, 4 were split out) years like it did previously. As it is right now there is a lot of duplicated information between the two. I think it would make things easier for the reader and less confusing of they were re-merged now. We even already have all the WWE events listed here, so outside of the 2012 SmackDown episode there is not much that isn't duplicated. Thoughts? - GalatzTalk 20:07, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page merge 

message: That bout was a piece of light relief at the end to send the fans home happy after they had seen Lex turn heel in the process of winning the World title.  Dusty vs Tully as the main event of Bash '85 I can just about live with, but saying that a slapstick involving Missy and Paul E was the main event of Bash '91 is just insulting.  I know it's fashionable to diss Lex's World title run to show support for how Flair was treated by Herd, but saying that it was a support feature to Missy and Paul E is extracting the urine.165.225.81.100 (talk) 08:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything you just mentioned is plain and simple WP:OR and WP:POV. The final match is considered the main event across the board on wikipedia. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 18:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is TOTALLY RIDICULOUS to call Rick & Missy vs Arn & Paul E the "main event" of Bash '91 just because it was last match on