Talk:The Nice

message: This article deserves some little improvement, but basically it is a good article, I can't see the reason of putting here a "clean up" tag. --Doktor Who 16:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it needs more factual information? I'm confused about where they're from; there's a link at the bottom to "British Musical Groups", and Keith Emerson is British, but the article goes straight into U.S. references and doesn't say where the band was based, which country they were performing with Arnold in, or where the other band members were from. Can somebody clarify? Wendy Collings 02:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Whomever marked this for cleanup should have their head examined.  A really nice piece of work.  I added a few updates and will add some album cover pics shortly.  Good lord! Cleanup deleted.  Tvccs 12:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Congrats To The Author(s) Of This Page 

message: It's a good page, very good compared with others I've seen. However, when most of the albums have their own Wiki pages, how much sense does it make to have that information duplicated in the band's main page? It makes maintenance difficult and could thus give rise to inconsistencies. Also, there's no separate page for the album "Nice", which seems to be a glaring omission. I'll happily volunteer to write it. Comments welcome. Rodhullandemu 02:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just had a look at the "Influence" section. It's a more or less solid block of fandom, IMHO, without references and probably violates Wikipedia:NPOV. There is a lot of speculation which is unsubstantiated. However, from my own POV(!) Nice probably influenced bands like Rare Bird, Atomic Rooster, and others. This needs some looking at, and I have some free time. Also Nice were important enough to be mentioned (indirectly) in "Groupie" by Jenny Fabian, and I would at least include a mention of this. I'll diarise this for a couple of days time & go ahead if nobody objects. --Rodhullandemu 00:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query 

message: The Elegy entry leads to a general subject article, and Elegy (The Nice album) redirects to the Nice (The Nice album) article which is quite odd. --kAtremer 19:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: page for "Elegy" is under construction & will be up as a stub within a couple of hours; when it is, the links will be sorted. --Rodhullandemu 20:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elegy 

message: I don't know if such promotional material is considered encyclopedic, so I'll just mention this and leave it up to the folks more active on this article to decide whether or not to include it.  A recent issue of Uncut magazine included a CD bonus called "Fill Your Head with Prog", and the song "America" by The Nice was the first track. - Ugliness Man 06:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comp appearance 

message: As ELP and Refugee are connected just by shared members, should they count as associated acts ? I don't think so. -- Beardo (talk) 03:08, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Template:Infobox musical artist's documentation, they are. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:13, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That says "The following uses of this field should be avoided:
...
Groups with only one member in common"
Surely The Nice - ELP only have one member in common ? - though, true, Refugee had two. -- Beardo (talk) 21:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Fortunately, Wikipedia does not work on absolute dogma but prefers common sense. Since ELP was a supergroup, and they covered Nice material from the word go (most obviously "Rondo", which was performed pretty much in the same manner), they would seem to be a related act even though they shared one member (albeit the most famous one). Plus numerous Emerson obituaries (example) mention The Nice at least as a footnote in addition to ELP. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated acts 

message: The article suggest that Emerson first used a Moog with ELP. But Rock Eras: Interpretations of Music and Society, 1954-1984 says this: "Keith Emerson's The Nice was the first group to use a Moog synthesizer..." and Mark Brend, in his, The Sound of Tomorrow: How Electronic Music Was Smuggled into the Mainstream says this: "In February 1970 The Nice appeared at the Royal Festival Hall in London with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra. Alongside Emerson's familar Hammomnd was Vickers' moog ..." There's quite a bit of detail in that last source. Maybe the article needs a little adjustment. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moog 

message: Hello!  About this, a couple of things.  (1) It's unclear from the text what "his abuse of the instrument" means.  I was guessing that someone who doesn't like this music had vandalized the page.  But your explanation in your recent edit summary explains it nicely.  Maybe that text should be added to that part of the lead.  (2) Emerson "decided to split the band" is ambiguous.  It was his decision to leave the band, right?  Or, was it his decision to split the band into to two different bands?  It's unclear, in my opinion. — Mudwater (Talk) 16:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It was definitely Emerson's choice to split the band, as mentioned in the "Reduction to a three-piece" section; there's certainly no evidence he would have been replaced, and even when the other two did with Patrick Moraz, they used a different name. "Musical style" mentions "He manhandled his Hammond L-100 organ, wrestling it and attacking it with daggers (which he used to hold down keys and sustain notes during these escapades)". Another trick (though not one I can find a reliable source for right now) is - get an L100, rock it back and forth, and then quickly turn the "reverb" switch on and off in time. Or, get a drumstick with reverb turned up and bash the reverb strings to get a rather unusual sound. You just can't do that on a Lowery (can you, Martin?) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you must mean one of these. Even harder on one of these:  Martinevans123 (talk) 19:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it have a stop for blowing a raspberry? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'd always favour a "flatulent "splat" sound reminiscent of a whoopee cushion." Martinevans123 (talk) 20:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this, then? — Mudwater (Talk) 21:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh! Quite ambitious. Looks fair, but I think we'd also have to have it (sourced) in the main body too? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I copied and pasted most of that from Ritchie333's edit summary here. — Mudwater (Talk) 21:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I guess we'd better ask him if he's got any good sources! Martinevans123 (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes (or not) 

message: User:Ritchie333 in the Members section timeline it showed P. P. Arnold as being in the band. There is no evidence for that in the article or on her page. That seems to be sufficient reason for adding the hatnote  without going further into detail of dates etc in the timeline. There was no source for Dave Kilminster being a member of the band at any time either, just a guest.SovalValtos (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you saying there is no evidence for The Nice being P. P. Arnold's backing band and forming as a result of that? If you want a source you could try here, here, here or here, and that's about ten seconds of searching on Google Books. Now I don't mean to be rude, but it sounds like you don't know what you're talking about. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Ritchie333 I said that there was no evidence for her being in the band. Sure they backed her, no question. Plenty of singers get backed by orchestras , bands or groups but it does not mean for that reason they become a member.SovalValtos (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members