Talk:Perseids

message: How fast do the particles move on the orbit?
They orbit very quickly, its quite remarkable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.10.172 (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the same everywhere. The meteorites don't care what's on the surface..
This page should also have some details of which countries can view the shower as well fireryone  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.186.193.119 (talk) 05:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this is the trail of a comet that has spread out and filled the entire highly elliptical orbit, shouldn't the Earth pass through that orbit twice in each year? The Earth's slightly elliptical orbit along the ecliptic should intersect with any other ellipse at two points, as long as the comet's orbit is on the ecliptic plane. Is the comet on the ecliptic, or is it not. If not, perhaps only one point intersects with the Earth orbit. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  further questions 

message: Much of the present article would make a great section titled "Viewing the Perseid metorites". SmithBlue 12:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he was just pulling your leg :>) Pomona17 (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  article as section 

message: The Australian Google site is currently featuring a cool new logo about this subject. Should it be mentioned on this page? http://www.google.com.au/ Christopedia (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's very useful so I'd say do not add. I find it useful to have here in the discussion though as it explain the possible peak in views and edits for the page. Mverleg (talk) 22:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Google logo 

message: Hmm, has it happened already? Alfred Lau (talk) 08:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happened already? 

message: Google has made "Perseids" the featured search page for today and is being bombarded with external link spam. Cleaned some up and added some info.Eedlee (talk) 09:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Really needs to be locked out of anonymous users, can someone help me figure out how to do this or who to contact for future instances? Eedlee (talk) 10:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The page for making requests is Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. William Avery (talk) 10:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cheers William. Eedlee (talk) 11:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Request for Semi-Protect entered Eedlee (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Page Semi-protected for 3 days Eedlee (talk) 17:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Listing 

message: What is the probability when every minute meteor fail down on radius 10-20 km, the visible horizon (a cone up), to hit an airplane ? That I can calculate (sky surface/airplane surface * number of hits in the sky surface/time  * time of flight duration)  But what fraction of meteor come down to 12 km altitude? Is the Earth hit the meteors circling sun or the meteors hit the earth. I think it is sum of both velocities. Do you know about any statistical calculations? Can pilot outmaneuver seeing approaching meteor (assuming at night)(are pilots train to look up (airbus cameras)) --- Anyway plane crashed and was piloted by "experienced pilots". I need quick answer since gonna flight tomorrow to Europe and this is day nr 13 and flight is at nigh arrival at morning :( 76.16.183.158 (talk) 10:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for discussion of the Perseids wiki entry. Reprinted AP releases don't appear to be relevant. Eedlee (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: note, virtually all Perseid meteors are grains of sand or smaller, so they would certaintly not damage an aircraft. The probability of a dangerous meteor hitting an aircraft remains extremely low, and not effected. Also, the typical Perseids you see burn up in the upper atmosphere, i'm pretty sure its well above where commercial airlines fly. So don't worry!Danski14(talk) 15:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  plane crash 8/12/2009 

message: I live in New York City, where can I view it and what time should I view it at?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.221.60 (talk) 13:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Get somewhere away from city lights as best you can. Since they are dim, you at least want to be able to adapt your eyes, even if you can't get away from the light pollution. The best times are after midnight, and getting better as it gets closer to dawn. The constellation Perseus will be rising in the East. You may want to face the East for perspective, but they can appear anywhere in the sky. Don't go with high expectations, its not a huge one this year and with all the lights it may be one every few minutes or less. Danski14(talk) 15:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Note, this page is for discussing improvements. If anyone else has general questions, its best to consult the article, or go to the Reference Desk. 15:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When and where to see it 

message: I'd edit this myself but I can't due to the current semi-protection. In the opening paragraph of the article, a recent filament left behind by the comet is mentioned, but the word links to the "filament" article regarding the overall structure of the universe.  This is obviously ridiculous and should be corrected.
DerekTK (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what it should link to, but I changed it to the disambig page Filament so it won't be inaccurate. ~ Booya Bazooka 05:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After some digging, I'm pretty sure that the source of the word is this NASA site. I've added the reference, and I removed the wikilink from filament altogether; I think they're just using the word to mean "a thin thread", and the disambig page didn't seem to help with that. I suppose we could link to wiktionary or something, but that seems a bit over the top.   Chzz  ►  05:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filament link is ridiculous 

message: This article still talks about the 2009 shower as if it is going to happen. Can someone knowledgeable update this with information about the 2010 shower??? 71.108.104.221 (talk) 19:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 

message: I can't figure out how to get to the talk page for it, but the mobile version of this site has been vandalized.  The URL is http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perseids?wasRedirected=true and contains the following sentence:
The Perseids are so-called because the point they appear to come money grubbing jews called the radiant, lies in the constellation Perseus.
someone please fix!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.121.217.22 (talk) 03:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  VANDALISM 

message: Can we get a more accurate time here, with hours of the day and time zone perhaps? Also, is the peak different or the same around the world? --93.223.44.237 (talk) 11:19, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peak of shower is on 12th of August - but in which time zone? 

message: The article says " As with all meteor showers, the rate is greatest in the pre-dawn hours, since the side of the Earth nearest to turning into the sun scoops up more meteors as the Earth moves through space." 
I don't think the turning Earth "scoops up more meteors" in the pre-dawn hours.  Every time zone has the same optimum viewing ("early morning"), but this accompanies a continuously changing "side of the Earth".  Isn't the reason more to do with high altitude reflection of sunlight and an optimum in early morning?
Sorry if this is not signed correctly.
173.54.35.118 (talk) 02:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: More rain hits the front windshield of a moving car then the side windows or back window. (Meteors generate their own light and it has nothing to do with reflected sunlight.) -- Kheider (talk) 20:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Right - I believe the reason is that your part of the Earth is running into the dust particles in the pre-dawn hours.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for early morning best viewing? 

message: Restored hypothesis of modified dates of death.
The first written testimony dates back to 100 years later in this paper. 
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depositio_martyrum
Across Italy where there were temples to Priapus and LaRenta they were built churches consecrated to Lorenzo. This hypothesis is documented in the document of Castrum Inui. The improbable event is the overlapping of the Priapo's festival with the martyrdom of the saint, not his canonization on a pre-existing festival that is rather a phenomenon well documented.
The Depositio Martyrum fixed events to give unity to the church, he had no historical claims more than it has today a papal encyclical.
The Catholic Church has abolished a section of the underworld (limbo) has no problems to secure the death of a saint at the table.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.53.139.245 (talk) 12:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About S. Lawrence 

message: What size are the particles burning in the atmosphere?
What is their composition?
Can they damage satelites or the ISS?
How come they are not recessing into to the sun if they are bound in an oval trajectory with only one center of movement (focal point)?
thanks
84.94.119.60 (talk) 14:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further further questions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Perseids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161024040047/http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2014/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2014/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161024034856/http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2013/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2013/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161016083404/http://imo.net/live/perseids2009/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2009/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161024035510/http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2008/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2008/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927041829/http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2007/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2007/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.realclearwx.com/july09.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/31jul_perseids2009/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Perseids. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140421081813/http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2012/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2012/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106001831/http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2011/ to http://www.imo.net/live/perseids2011/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The first paragraph states: 
Clicking on Riordanian takes you to a page about an Irish surname. That makes no sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foerno (talk • contribs) 12:11, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riordanian? 

message: This site gives details on a Perseid meteor shower in 1976: https://in-the-sky.org/news.php?id=19760812_10_100 if a regular editor here wants to add it. 5Q5|✉ 12:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1976 Perseid meteor shower missing