Talk:Summons of the Lord of Hosts

message: Thanks for adding the sections into the Surih's, I had them only as titles, but this gives more room for future additional information. Good work. Nmentha 00:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The pages Lawh-i-Ra'ís, Súriy-i-Mulúk, Lawh-i-Fu'ád, Súriy-i-Ra'ís have been created, but the content of these pages is a copy of the short statement from this page (Summons of the Lord of Hosts, and the opening paragraphs of the various tablets.  Wikipedia is not a place to host the content of pages, we have reference.bahai.org for that.  
Following in the style of Tablets of Bahá'u'lláh, I will redirect those newly created pages to this article. -- Jeff3000 01:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be fine in general, but Wikipedia is not a source for original work.  We can not write what we feel about the tablets.  Instead we have to write a published review of the tablet, for example from Adib Taherzadeh's "Revelation of Baha'u'llah".  If there is enough stuff that we can take from those books to comment on the tablets in "Summons of the Lord of Hosts" then I'll help you make the new pages, but I don't think there is enough published commentary on these tablets.  Remember we can't plagirize the content from "Revelation of Baha'u'llah" either, but summarize it's statements. -- Jeff3000 02:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Furthermore, leaving quotes as temporary content in place of better content, I don't believe is acceptable. -- Jeff3000 02:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Also look at the talk page of Baha'i World Centre buildings, where we want to consolidate many small pages in one big page.  Until there is enough content to break an article apart, it's best to put content in the main page where's it more accessible. -- Jeff3000 02:25, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Nmentha, actually if Wikipedia policies are followed there is no original work, and everything is referenced.  Please take a look at the addition that I did to Lawh-Fuad.  I took a look at the Revelation of Baha'u'llah and added the content; everything that I wrote is from there, and none of it is my original work.  Also I disagree that we should start with pages for all the tablets right now since they will become their own page.  If and only if there is enough content for their own page should the page be created.  Regardless you can always create a link that goes straight to the middle of the page, ie Lawh-i-Fu'ád. -- Jeff3000 03:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I take it to mean that "we" as contributers are not supposed to be the 'primary source' of the information; I agree, no question on my part. Nmentha 06:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Good work on Lawh-Fuad Nmentha 04:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I have to say that I agree with the consolidation of the tablets on this page. It follows the examples on Tablets of Baha'u'llah, and since they are all printed as one book now, it makes sense to add them here. I doubt that any of the tablets will warrant an expansion to fill an entire page, so I assume just leave them on this page. I also deleted and redirected Suriy-i-Mulúk, which ironically just has an accent missing and nobody caught it. Cuñado  - Talk 07:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with consolidating the various tablets into one article on the current book.  MARussellPESE 19:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tablets

message: :Image:Summons.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Summons.jpg

message: I don't understand how the texts are written in a pentacle.
Can you provide an image?
--Error (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image