Talk:New 7 Wonders of Nature

message: Is this the correct title for this page? Should it be New7Wonders of Nature as corny as it is.  When the title is determined it needs to be added to the DAB page for Wonders of the World (disambiguation). MDSNYDER 16:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems,this should be merged with the other articles. Anyway, I added this:The 77 official nominees - of more than 200 - will be considered by the New7Wonders of Nature panel of experts for naming the 21 finalists. The first round of online voting ends on December 31, 2008, after which the panel will list the final 21, from which the last round of online voting will determine the final 7.newsinfo.inquirer.net, Underground river moving closer to top 7 in online vote --Florentino floro (talk) 08:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

text: The correct name is definitely not "New7Wonders of Nature"; it is "New 7 Wonders of Nature". Nowhere in the sources does it run the first three words together like that. Bricology (talk) 21:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment

message: ... about whether this is noteworthy enough for WP, and whether it will amount to a hill of beans! At present, five of the top seven are almost unknown, and the leading seven omits wonders which anyone with half a brain would think mandatory, such as the Amazon basin (river+forest). Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  skeptical... 

message: like the junk mail we all get: official notice from <insert sender name here>. It's a collective blog with 100,000,000 votes, but no criteria of who the electorate is, nor any control on the vote early and often crowd. Officious, yes. Official, hardly. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This is "official"

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: New7Wonders of Nature → New Seven Wonders of Nature — Move on the basis of WP:MOSTM. Labattblueboy (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
El yunque is NOT United States - Its PUERTO RICO. What a shame  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.165.54 (talk) 17:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: An image used in this article, File:Ha Long Bay.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Ha Long Bay.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Why does the criticisms header include the speech of the Philippine president which I think is not a criticism of the contest itself? -Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 11:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: your question has been referred to a team of Panamanian lawyers. seriously, what an odd sentence, something out of hunter thompson. Are Panamanian lawyers known for a particular quality of lawyerness? removed as unsourced.(mercurywoodrose)76.232.10.255 (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: Pakistan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.185.58.173 (talk) 16:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  8th wonder of the world 

message: The section "Stages of the campaign" seems to have been copied on July 27 2012 (diff) from a blog article dated July 7, 2012 which in turn seems to be a copy with minor changes, of the official world.new7wonders.com website. I am therefore reverting that section to the pre July 2012 version. Rincewind42 (talk) 15:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New7Wonders of Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130331012028/http://world.new7wonders.com/new7wonders-of-nature/new7wonders-of-nature-voting-procedure/ to http://world.new7wonders.com/new7wonders-of-nature/new7wonders-of-nature-voting-procedure
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on New7Wonders of Nature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912060651/http://watch.ctv.ca/news/canada-am/travel/ to http://watch.ctv.ca/news/canada-am/travel/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120512223703/http://viajestop10.com/las-nuevas-7-maravillas-del-mundo-ya-fueron-elegidas/ to http://viajestop10.com/las-nuevas-7-maravillas-del-mundo-ya-fueron-elegidas/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: For some reason there are three related WP articles that all use the naming convention of "New7Wonders..." However, nowhere in the source materials (i.e., the official website) do they run the first three words of the name together like that; it is always written as "New 7 Wonders..." My suspicion is that all three articles were begun by the same editor who introduced that irregularity. They should be corrected. Bricology (talk) 21:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The organization seems to use both variations (like in their FAQ) but I've requested a move because if given the choice we should stick to proper English. Cslk (talk) 10:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title needs to be corrected 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. No objections to adding spaces around the 7. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 06:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 May 2022