Talk:Emotional affair

message: This page's tone, particularly in the opening (i.e, "They can be wonderful and life changing experiences. They are the stuff of great stories that teeter on the edge of consumation.") is neither neutral nor very formal. Links should also be modified (many still have an underscore between words). This article should include citations and focus more on statistics and studies. A section on incidence in literature/pop culture might be relevant, too.
Emotional affairs often involve deep friendship and intimacy as well as sexuality, which can lead to real problems if they cause another relationship to form. Tracing and proving this sort of infidelity can be extremely difficult, however. - Tracking Down Emotional Affairs
ServeNow 23:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The tone of this entry is very one sided and not neutral in the least. It should be completely rewritten to reflect a neutral and formal tone, and not the tone of a self help book on emotional problems. 
Dmaxen 21:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be overhauled 

message: My spouse recently confessed to me that he was having an emotional affair (not "had" past tense, but is having.) He works with this woman. I have seen her. She is beautiful. He claims that he cannot control the way she makes him feel. He says that his feeling for her do not diminish how he feels for me, but then, 3 out of 5 nights (he works 5 days a week) he tells me, right before we go to bed, "I couldn't stop thinking about her today...I really tried, but I just can't."  Sometimes he tells me in the morning, "I don't know what to do about these sexual dreams I am having about her."  I suppose I should not feel cheated on or in pain about this “platonic” relationship.  He has a good job.  I do not want him to quit his job.  Moreover, I am glad he is being open about it and telling me.  Still at the same time, I am deeply wounded.  I wish the pain would go away.  I wish I were enough for him. I wish I could believe that once this little “problem” is over it would never happen again.  Is it true we really cannot control or manage our feelings?
I am the "other woman" in an emotional affair similar to the one you describe, with a co-worker.  I will try to put some salve on the hurt.  No one person can be all things to another.  It is not any inadequacy on your part; it is just that there are other spectacular people out there, too.  I am in love with my manager, and I think he is in love with me.  His wife just found out.  Things are coming to a head.  I expect to be reassigned, but I don't really expect the affair to end.  On the other hand, I don't expect him to leave his wife, and I don't expect that we will ever have sex, either.  Their marriage is shaky and this will either stengthen it or blast it to smithereens.  I hope it is the former.  But I do hope to continue my "special friendship" with this man.  So please be tolerant.  Good can come of it.  No one wants to hurt you.  I think a major part of the problem is that your husband is confiding his every thought to you.  That has got to hurt.  Doesn't he have a male friend he can talk to about it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.253.47.232 (talk) 02:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emotional Affairs Hurt 

message: I have some doubts about the definitions of "emotional affair" given in this article and am left wondering about how well it complies with WP:NPOV.  By the definitions given here, any friendship that has any emotional involvement at all can be construed as an "emotional affair" if someone's partner disapproves of the friendship and he or she refuses to disown the friend at the partner's request (thus amounting to "betrayal").  It's not uncommon for people's partners to disapprove of having any friends at all, and particularly friends of the opposite sex, on the basis "family before friends"- are we saying this is absolutely okay?  What about cases where a partner has the fear that a platonic friend "might" turn into a threat for the relationship- is it reasonable for the partner to forbid the friendship on that basis instead of trying to get the pair of friends to alleviate the fear by confirming their support for the marriage?
If someone's marriage turns rocky or abusive, thus severing his or her emotional ties with the partner, if he/she has any close friends, he/she will automatically end up with stronger emotional bonds with the friends than with the partner.  By the "you can't invest more emotionally into friends than your partner" diagnosis of emotional affairs, the friends could easily end up accused of having emotional affairs and scapegoated for the rockiness/abusiveness in the marriage, which doesn't seem right to me.
There are also some inherent "family before friends"-related double standards involved.  If someone gets abused by his or her partner, and so confides in an opposite-sex friend for emotional support, this situation fits the definitions of "emotional affair" given here and is likely to result in the friend being scapegoated for the abuse within the marriage- but if it's a cousin who provides the support, then it isn't considered an affair purely because the cousin is considered a family member.  I think this raises serious issues.  I don't see why friends deserve to be vilified for giving support that family members would be applauded for giving- nor do I see why family members should be exempted from the issue since it's entirely possible for family members to prise apart marriages that they disapprove of using emotional techniques- this quite commonly occurs when cross-racial marriages occur and the family is prejudiced against one race or the other.
If these examples aren't considered "emotional affairs" then this article might need revising as it implies that they are.
Tws45 (talk) 15:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emotional affairs do hurt- but so might over-diagnosis of the term 

message: Tried to add some more details into the phenomenon of an emotional affair, fix the sentence structures, etc so it was easier to read.  Do edit / fix it up - especially to help me put in relevant citations etc - as you wish [short of outright reverting it please >_< heh]..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Travelsonic (talk • contribs) 18:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempted to fix up the first paragraph 

message: Saying that we understand what constitutes an emotional affair implies that we completely understand the boundaries of the alleged "victim" [of said emotional affair].  What I mean is, quite literally, ANYTHING involving ANY KIND of emotional contact from the 'other party' in a given relationship that violates the boundaries of the first person and that he/she considers a deception or violation of the sanctity of the relationship is absolutely an emotional affair, period.
In rare cases, I think it can be argued that the boundaries of the victim were either never made clear to begin with, or that a through a certain amount of deception, led the 'offender' to believe that he/she was not violating any boundaries at all.  Of course, if you ask me, I don't know what kind of person commits to any sort of relationship without having a pretty good idea what kinds of things are going to hurt their significant other.
Rule of thumb here:  If you have to lie about it, you shouldn't be doing it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JawnBen (talk • contribs) 10:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emotional affairs are subjective, period. 

message: While it can be argued that emotional affairs are only subjective, at some point a relationship may become axiomatically inappropriate. Whether the emotional affair progresses to something physical, even if non-sexual, but certainly non platonic (kissing, hand holding etc). Or a primary relationship partner discovers something that is so intimate (again need not be sexual), that there is no doubt the relationship has become inappropriate. The consequence of presuming only a subjective nature is that it may cause the need for the partner who feels injured to seek proof and level consequences. It can be argued, that if you are not doing anything wrong, the partner(s) outside the perceived affair can level no consequences as there is nothing a reasonable person could object to or, if non reasonable, would be taken seriously if they did. The idea of cognitive dissonance may come into play. Where the people involved in the affair, even people surrounding the affair (work colleagues, friends) cause an echo chamber where they rationalize the relationship, even when they suspect or know it to be inappropriate. When evidence of the inappropriateness is presented and/or consequences felt, the partner in the inappropriate relationship will likely respond within the model of behavior indicative of cognitive dissonance. That is to say, denial, anger, resentment, and rationalization amongst other responses. This may further divide the primary relationship partners past the point of reconciliation. So yes, emotional affairs can be subjective, until they are not. Without a good internal objective monologue indicating the "wrongess" of it and action taken to make it right, what is occurring is the injection of energy into the situation which may result in highly undesirable results for all associated with the affair.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmshade (talk • contribs) 14:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective to Objective 

message: I've gone through this article and removed any assertions lacking attribution. Where possible I found research that supported the assertions. If the neutrality template needs to go back that's fine. I'll do my best to continue researching and removing unsubstantiated opinions.
leica 13:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Template 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Emotional affair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070307165624/http://www.norc.org:80/homepage.htm to http://www.norc.org/homepage.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article has (regained?) both style and POV issues, primarily in the introduction - see MOS concerning second-person pronouns in particular. I'm going to try to clean this up but the page needs a bigger overhaul. Exasperatedwolverine (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regardless of subjectivity, there are NPOV issues 

message: This has an almost judgmental attitude to some of the attributes. It's just so strange to me. I have never read an article on wikipedia that felt so informal, like a subreddit rule section or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conoreb (talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is one of the weirdest articles, tonally.  

message: It's strange and harmful to equate a patient-therapist relationship with that of an affair. Of course, the source is an obscure book from the 80s. 2001:871:20F:8946:3E68:57FC:794:935D (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Therapy as subset" 

message: The sentence "Such closeness can also be a reaction to separate injury in the relationship, and indeed can be utilized to resolve the injury and heal the primary relationship" reads like a recommendation or justification for an emotional affair.  This should be removed or needs attribution to a reliable source.  I don't believe having an emotional affair is an approach to healing any injury or issues in a long-term relationship, except insofar as "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger."  Rather, it reads like someone's justification for their own choice to pursue that path. Dmammenvt (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another non-neutral sentence