lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Variable triplefin

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Stargazer (fish)

message: I thought the article said stargazers were marine! Why is the leopard drinking salwater? It looks like vandalism to me. --♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I highly agree. I will find out who did it and talk to them. 70.171.224.249 (talk) 21:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supposed BBC story 
Talk:Granville Brothers Aircraft

message: The "Replica Gee Bees" section starts with this problematic sentence: "In 1970 Ken Flager built a replica of the Florence Klingensmith's Model Y in 1984."  What year was this thing built, 1970 or 1984? Phaethon 0130 (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1970 or 1984? 
Talk:Eelpout

message: Disagree - There is no connection at all apart from both being fishes.  They are even in different Orders. GrahamBould 08:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, a bizarre merge suggestion. It might be worth a dab link to burbot at the top of the page here, after confirming that fishbase or somebody else documents "eelpout" as a name known to be used for burbots. Stan 17:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Third opposition to a merge. Just checking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Whatlinkshere/Eelpout makes it quite clear merging is the last thing that should be done to this fish name. Instead; if it is genuinely true that somebody calls the burbot an eelpout, the case might be made for disambiguation. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 18:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with burbot

message: As per the above discussion, and opening 'disambiguation' terminology sentence of the article, a special purpose, one article editor added an entire section about "eelpouts" angling, actually about burbots. The section was without references, and for good measure, included an external link. It's been eliminated, and I'm not going to bother leaving a message at the editor's User Page. If anyone else wants to contact the editor, please go right ahead. Tapered (talk) 01:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eelpout/burbout section removal & commentary 

message: old distribution section was for just one species and had contradictory information, deleted the wrong information and moved the distribution to the lead as there really isn't a lot to say about it 66.212.64.182 (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted distribution section 

message: — Assignment last updated by JulesA27 (talk) 12:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Deep-Sea Biology
Talk:Limp eelpout

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Northern cavefish

message: What is this source? I can't find it, and the quotation from it needs some cleanup. I'm reluctant to take it out without a suitable replacement, though.Matttoothman (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Guide to America

message: Should the newly discovered Hoosier Cavefish be added to this page or should a new page be made for it? http://www.sci-news.com/biology/science-hoosier-cavefish-eyeless-fish-species-indiana-01955.html 50.106.90.130 (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amblyopsis hoosieri
Talk:Pickled pigs' feet

message: *Move to Pickled pigs' feet. "Pigs feet" is not a possible grammatical construction 
in English. Badagnani (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: more appropriate to be simply pigs feet because the dish is not alway eaten pickled, as the article indicates. --Rex Diablo (talk) 14:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Moved. Equinox (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal

message: This one of those topics for which reliable sources are not easy to find. --Zeamays (talk) 04:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficult to find references
Talk:List of Toronto Blue Jays broadcasters

message: There is some dispute over the year Brian Williams started calling Blue Jays games.  This is an excerpt from Williams’ bio on page 280 of the 1995 Blue Jays media guide:
BRIAN WILLIAMS
Play-by-play Announcer (CBC Network)
Will call all the action on CBC broadcasts of 1995 Toronto Blue Jays games…1993 marked his first season as a regular Blue Jays broadcaster…He is best known as the host of CBC SPORTS WEEKEND, a weekly sports program that covers a variety of sports from Formula 1 Auto Racing and World Cup skiing to curling and horse racing.
As noted above, Williams started as CBC's play-by-play announcer for Blue Jays games in 1993, not 1995.  I also distinctly remember Williams calling Blue Jays games in 1993 and 1994.  Please stop changing this. WAMCO1993 (talk) 17:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brian Williams

message: The proper spelling of the surname is Olver, not Oliver.  In addition to the media guide citation beside his name, his IMDb profile and a Toronto Sun article from 2006 also prove this.
For years I thought the spelling was Oliver, despite the fact that I saw him on TV regularly when he was covering the Blue Jays.  His name, however, is spelled Olver.WAMCO1993 (talk) 00:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Fergie Olver 
Talk:Caragea's plague

message: "…although the following reported death occurred in June 1813." Does this mean "…although the next reported death from plague in Wallachia occurred in June 1813"? If so, the latter would be much clearer. If it means something else, then I even after re-reading three or four times I couldn't work it out. - Jmabel | Talk 01:47, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, found it in the source, I did understand correctly and am editing accordingly. - Jmabel | Talk 02:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear phrase

message: Do we know what disease caused this plague? RMcPhillip (talk) 16:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Disease?
Talk:Kirov Airship

message: I don't think this article should be deleted because it is not a game guide and I also don't think this is a pointless article.--Taida 21:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was supposed to be merged as per my ruling. If it is not merged, I will have to delete it. — Deckiller 02:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's pointless anyway, this is all you would get in the instruction book for the game. It has no point or place on Wikipedia, it really should go. The Haunted Angel 12:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just merged this article into Red Alert 2.--Taida 16:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Les Misérables (1998 film)

message: i thought marius wanted a Republic, not anarchy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.252.42 (talk) 06:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  marius 
Talk:Lost in Space (film)

message: can we PLEASE have som pictures of the charecters?81.108.233.59 (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures? 

message: I believe there were some novels, perhaps aimed at young readers, which took place after the events of the movie and there may have even been comic books or a graphic novel.  Does anyone have any information on these items which can be added to the article? 66.110.6.119 (talk) 15:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Media 

message: https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/lost-in-space-re-release.html -- Is this worth mentioning? Kdammers (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-release
Talk:Monument Ave. (film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Monument Ave. →  – Dubious PT claim, redirect to Monument Avenue. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 March 2024
Talk:Music from Another Room (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Someone may stylewise disagree, but at least the more incessantly demanding and subjective recounts have been edited out.
Arcsoda (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessarily detailed plot, adressed
Talk:Noah (2014 film)

message: The sentence: The biblical text does not include the names of the wives of Noah or his sons... is incorrect. Accepted text of Genesis gives the names of Noah's sons as Shem, Ham, and Japheth. rowley (talk) 08:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What this passage means is that the sons' wives names aren't given. It looks misleading because "sons" is spelled without the possessive apostrophe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.102.148.214 (talk) 19:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The names were given
Talk:Career Center (Winston-Salem, North Carolina)

message: article needs a better name - sounds like its about career centresVictuallers 15:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @   I'm moving the page. There are a great magnitude of high schools, and things in general, called "career centers" or "Career Center". I'm going to move the page and make a disambig now. PseudoSkull (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: The page has been tagged with a Wikify template, yet it appears to be up to standard to me. What needs to be fixed to have it removed? Whitemage33 14:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad, i probably should have added a "too listy tag and should be made more into prose tag", but i don't know the exact code for it, so i just added a wikify, thinking someone might fix it up. Sorry for confusion. But if you think the list of all those subjects and such is fine then just remove the tag. It was my random opinion when going through stubs at the stub sensor project. Cya calaka 14:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Fare enough, remove away :). calaka 01:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify?
Talk:The Opposite of Sex

message: There is a change between Dede and Deedee... 2 uses and 5 uses respectively.
Sjtaunton (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed according to IMDB. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity
Talk:Premante Idera

message: * Screen --—Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Bob (song)

message: Somebody just vandalized this page, but I'll fix it.Gen. Quon 01:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I will be merging several articles for individual songs in the upcoming days. This article will be merged with the article for Poodle Hat due to lack of meaningful content and notability required for a separate page.Spman (talk) 03:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to Merge
Talk:Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island

message: Could someone edit this phrase so that is no longer contradicts itself, and is factually correct?
:Like a number of direct-to-video Scooby-Doo animated films released in the late-1990s and early-2000s, Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island was the first to feature real monsters instead of simple bad guys in masks.
StephenBuxton 07:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been rewritten now. The confusion is that the continuity was reset. It's a big plot point in Zombie Island that up until now the monsters encountered by the gang have always been bad guys in masks (and they've now realised this) but now they discover real monsters for the first time. This means the 1980s real monsters stories are not part of this particular canon (and quite possibly Scrappy Doo isn't either). Timrollpickering (talk) 01:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory Phrase

message: Who did the boss of shaggy and Scooby at the airport? Pborri (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: "The film is also notable for being the first Scooby-Doo production featuring the entire gang since The New Scooby-Doo Mysteries episode A Halloween Hassle at Dracula’s Castle."
What about A Pup Named Scooby Doo? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error?
Talk:The Second Jungle Book: Mowgli & Baloo

message: User:Stephanie921 recently undit my edit here, citing an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#Deadnames and film credits. However, until/unless there is another RfC with a different consensus, I think there is a general consensus (from past RfCs, and as a general practice on other articles such as Inception) to include the credited name as a footnote. It seems to me, the fact that there is an ongoing discussion which might lead to another RfC which might lead to a different consensus does not mean we shouldn't implement the current consensus. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding credited name as a footnote
Talk:Senseless

message: I'm confused.  This article lists Albert Beveridge as a producer and links to Albert J. Beveridge, a late nineteenth and early twentieth century politician and historian.  He died 71 years before this movie came out.  Is there some deep meaning here that I do not understand?  If it means a different Albert Beveridge, it should probably not link to the 1899 Senator from Indiana.  The Grand Rans (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found reference on other places to Albert Beveridge listed as co-producer or associate producer for this movie, and a few others in the same time period.  This leads me to the assumption that this is not just a mistake, but there is actually a person who produced films in the late 90's named Albert Beveridge.  I have, as of yet, found precisely zero biographical information on this mysterious character, only lists of films he was involved in (like this one).  For the time being, I will redlink to  Albert Beveridge (film producer).  The Grand Rans (talk) 02:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albert Beveridge? 

message: This movie was incorrectly labelled as a romantic comedy.  Just because there is a love interest in a film does not make it a romantic comedy.  The center plot of the movie is the character trying to land a job, not find a love interest.  FearNotMan (talk) 14:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romantic Comedy
Talk:Six-String Samurai

message: If I remember correctly the katana was never hidden inside the guitar (one would think that would deteriorate the sound of the guitar anyways), instead I believe the sheath of the katana was duct-taped to the back of the guitar, perhaps giving the appearance that it was hidden. Is it possible that anyone can verify this?
:Just an additional edit, if you look at the photo on IMDB at  it certainly appears that the sheathe is separate from the actual guitar. Any arguements?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.127.191.82 (talk) 00:25, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 
i just watched the movie, and the sheath is definitely taped to the back of the guitar. Cig7 06:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Katana in Guitar?

message: The article suggests that the W-people are presumably from Area 51. I don't see any evidence for that in the movie. Nellis AFB and 51 are easy to associate with a plot that involves a mythical journey through the desert to Vegas. But the Windmill People are dressed in space suits (realistic looking ones at that), whereas Area 51 is mostly associated with the Roswell aliens (who might have worn suits, but not ones with USA flags on the shoulder). The nearest AFB that would have any connection to the Space Program would be Edwards in CA, but that would still be a strange anachronism given the time period that the movie is supposed to occur in. C d h (talk) 00:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Windmill People
Talk:Slums of Beverly Hills

message: The plot section in this article is more of a synopsis, as it does not give a full summary of the story or the main plot points. I notice that other more developed articles in the WikiProject Film have a detailed plot summary. Should this section be revised to add a more detailed summary of the film's plot? TheFoggiestMorning (talk) 07:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Section
Talk:Sour Grapes (1998 film)

message: Why did Ebert hate the film?Lestrade 01:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ebert

message: Is the title appropriate? Why sour grapes? That implies that something is rejected because a person pretends that it isn't desired.Lestrade (talk) 20:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Strange Parallel

message: Someone please show me a music sample (not Elliott) of the Rachmaninoff showing that it is in fact that piece. I'm so sure it is Chopin's fantaisie-impromptu. Am I taking crazy pills or something? - Phorque 05:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to follow up on this, I realised that this was in fact Rachmaninoff because FreeDB tagged a classical compilation incorrectly when I ripped it. My bad there. - Phorque 11:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rachmaninoff

message: Dave England is creditted as the Devil and Skateboarder Cam - is this the same Dave England who was in Jackass? It claims on his IMDB page (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0257424/bio) that he lived in Portland, Oregon where some of this was filmed....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.12.13 (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dave England
Talk:Lenox Avenue Gang

message: I added an image of Whitey Lewis.  I wanted to put it on his article page, but the lack of an article made it difficult.  Is there a lot more information to be added here? Or could Harry Horowitz (and all the gang members whose articles are short or non-existent) be merged into this article?--Will.i.am 02:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The gang vs. members 

message: It's been said before, but we absolutely cannot use Jay Robert Nash as the sole source for an article. Any statement which can only be sourced to Nash must be removed immediately. I'm giving you-who-watchlist-this-article a head's-up rather than deleting it outright, but get things done fast - like, 'next couple of days' fast. Got it? DS (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Tippmann 98 custom

message: This article is written like an ad. Requesting cleanup.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.90.175.103 (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing style

message: "It is the most popular paintball gun on the market and because of that it has the largest variety of aftermarket parts available for any paintball gun."
This is a very bold statement. I'm not a Tippman owner and so there is a possibility I might be wrong, but I'm fairly certain that this isn't true. I would venture to guess that Autocockers have a far larger variety of aftermarket parts. Perhaps this sentence should be toned down. Either that, or sourced.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Donutmonger (talk • contribs) .
          
If someone could resolve this, it would be good, as I think the "the neutrality of this article is disputed [...]" tag at the top doesn't look good for the article, or for the editors. The Editor 2 21:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah okay... Doesn't care... It's still POV till it's cited. I am removing it. The opening para needs to remain sweet, short and concise anyway. Put it back in (In a different section) with a citation only. ScarianTalk 17:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy?

message: I don't agree with this, the opening line: "The Tippmann 98 Custom, also called the M98C, Model 98 Custom, 98 Custom, and simply the 98, is an open-bolt inline blowback marker designed especially for the sport of paintball."
I have read extensively, and have seen firsthand that their is a large difference between the Model 98, and the Custom 98, or 98 Custom. Distinction should always be made. For now, I've changed it to the proper way. If you have problems with it, please discuss it with me. Thanks, The Editor 2 01:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy #2 

message: The Paintball WikiProject has been created. Please take a moment to visit its page, and join if you are interested. Thanks! ~ Maximilli, 19:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Paintball

message: "allowing for fast in-game cleaning"
Does this mean a full disassemble (about 6 minutes, not what I'd call "fast") or just the barrel and detent? Because I doubt you could strip down and clean a 98 "in-game" in even the slowest paced woodsball match.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.71.251 (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sure about this