Talk:Operation Trident (1971)

message: Hi all.
It's important that we don't sound like Wikipedia is taking sides here. Beware of congratulatory language or editorialising. Thanks. DJ Clayworth 18:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The reference and comparison to six day war is WP:OR by Ironboy11 as the cited texts shows no mention of the included texts . hence the wp:OR texts has been removed--dBigXray (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: i have added "the first use of ship launched missile in the war" from ref name="GlobalSecurity". also i have reverted the paragraph to the original form by Editor  Mandarax  as this version of paragraph was to the point . the earlier version ( by Mandarax)and the current version now reads the task group converged about  south of Karachi detected Pakistani targets, analyzed as warships 45 miles to the northwest and 42 miles to the northeast. --dBigXray (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation 

message: The success of this operation prompted another successful attack on  Karachi on 8 December 1971, known as Operation Python. was the stable version before edits by  (now blocked)User:Ironboy11 as the attack was not just limited to pakistan naval forces. 
The version after the edits by  (now blocked)User:Ironboy11 was "attack on Pakistani Naval forces in Karachi" is incorrect i have reverted it back to the correct version.--dBigXray (talk) 00:51, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath 

message: the citation Pakinfo http://www.pakdef.info/contactus.html seems to me a Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources. Editors are requested to verify this fact and remove the citations (if needed). --dBigXray (talk) 23:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: let me make it clear for once and for all I neither promote pakdef nor have i used it in my editings. it is you lTopGunl (talk)  who have deliberately used this :*lTopGunl (talk) please go through http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_62#pakdef.info . As going by the current status pak def info is non reliable source. PLEASE REFRAIN from making edits by using non reliable source as it will only weaken your case and any other WIKIPEDIA EDITOR will revert your edits with all your hard work gone waste. and also Just because a statement does not please you id no justification for calling it  a POV you are supposed to give proper proof with NEUTRAL citation before calling it as POV. Please understand that by using Non RELIABLE sources you are EXTENSIVELY damaging the neutrality and credibility of WIKIPEDIA regards --dBigXray (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations ?  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Operation Trident (1971). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110830105254/http://www.paffalcons.com/gallery/aviation-art/syed-hussaini/trauma-and-reconstruction.php to http://www.paffalcons.com/gallery/aviation-art/syed-hussaini/trauma-and-reconstruction.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified