lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bergenholm space drive

message: "Accelerate greatly in any direct" is not a good description of the way that inertialess objects behaved in the 'Lensman' stories. They instantaneously achieved terminal velocity (for the force they were subject to and the medium they were in). And an instantaneous change of velicity means that acceleratiion is undefined, not 'great'.
I have edited the text accordingly. Agemegos 04:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accelerate greatly 

message: This article was deleted without sufficient consensus; I've restored it.
—FlashSheridan (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration 

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with the more complete one on Inertialess Drives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.217.0 (talk) 07:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; this was formally proposed in May 2014, and given objections over almost another 3 years, I've merged all referenced, of which there is none (despite being tagged as unreferenced for 8 years). Klbrain (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article with Inertialess_drive 

message: The 100,000 parsecs per hour mentioned as the top speed in intergalactic space would equal about 2.86 billion times the speed of light. AMCKen (talk) 23:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Velocity
Talk:Richard Lindner (painter)

message: Fully breasted girl sitting in a hula hoop, I would like to sell. I do have documents for the painting, can anyone help me. I love Linder, but my children don’t. I’m old and don’t want it to get thrown out. I know it is valuable. I do understand we could probable work something out. 2603:6000:BC00:700:6D8D:7AB:22EC:F51E (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My email is pattyflannery16@yahoo.com 2603:6000:BC00:700:6D8D:7AB:22EC:F51E (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linder painting- girl in a hula hoop
Talk:Driver (film)

message: It's only been 5 months since it was announced and this page is nominated for deletion? It's a confirmed film with an attached director, writer, and producer. Beanssnaeb 04:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I originally proposed the article for deletion on the basis that there had been no news since April 2006.  Generally, no news means inactive production, which isn't very assuring of the film ever being made.  Hence Wikipedia's no-crystal-balling policy.  Since you contested the proposed deletion, I went ahead and cleaned up the article to see if there was any history or recent events tied into the film.  Unfortunately, there don't seem to be any, and director Roger Avary has failed to mention following up on Driver after writing and executive producing for Beowulf.  In addition, there is no actual citation that says that Avary is even attached to direct this film -- the most recent citation in this film article says that he was attached to write it and nothing further.  I found another, more unreliable, citation from the day before that had an "exclusive" announcement of Roger Avary writing and directing Driver.  Maybe that's where it's come from and why it's on IMDb, because I find it highly unusual that there's no direct mention of Avary being attached to direct Driver at any of the movie news aggregator websites I checked out.  I'm tempted to put up this article for deletion.  Do you have any counter-arguments to that? --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 23:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you honestly believe it is worth deleting, go ahead. When more concrete info comes in the future, i will go ahead and recreate the page. sound alright? --Beanssnaeb 01:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: The Gans new item that states he is director is incorrect. --Beanssnaeb 03:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to what?  I haven't found a citation that said Roger Avary was actually the director, just "adapting" the film.  Any citations outside of IMDb? —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 03:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --Beanssnaeb 03:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, works for me. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 03:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director
Talk:Richard Bland

message: http://blandheritage.org/GENEALOGY/database/html/dat19.htm#11 - Location (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Deadlink Allreet (talk) 22:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference

message: I revised this extensively, although I had planned on starting a different article today. I haven't checked genealogy reference sources, but trimmed some about his birth family, and moved the rest of the genealogy near the end. I don't know whether a bigger pet peeve is genealogies without death dates or those without birth dates, but presume many of his children did not reach adulthood. However, listing those who married into the aristocracy or held office themselves is important, IMHO. For what it's worth, four men named Richard Bland served in the Virginia General Assembly in the colonial and early state era, the last in 1790. Also, R.T. Bland served in 1891-1892.Jweaver28 (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed
Talk:KGDB

message: Since kernel debuggers are used by Linux kernel developers, I cannot find good third party sources on these technologies.  It may be that kernel mailing lists and self published sources are OK for kernel debuggers since these tools are used by hard core developers and are not particularly prone to being mentioned in news articles.  At any rate, I tagged the article.  Perhaps someone can enlighten on this type of technology since technology mailing lists using the tools may be alright for a kernel debugger. Linuxmdb (talk) 00:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Sources 
Talk:Liberty XL2

message: :I have restored the original link to the type club - both that and the other link posted take you to the same place, one via a general page. - Ahunt (talk) 19:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft Type Club 

message: In my opinion rate of climb grater than 200 m/s is a little too big for this kind of aircraft. Someone should check and change it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.230.85.166 (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup it is conversion error. We have a new auto-conversion specs template, so I will just replace the template with the new one and all should make sense then. - Ahunt (talk) 14:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rate of climb in metric system 
Talk:Hutchinson Commons

message: I believe the University now officially calls this room Hutchinson Commons. Should the title be changed? mitcho/芳貴 04:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hutchinson Commons?

message: The photo that claims to be Hutchinson from the courtyard is wrong. It is actually a photo of Bond Chapel looking toward Cobb.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mstevenmarsden (talk • contribs) 22:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Photo 

message: Before saying what Hutchinson Common is modelled after, wouldn't it be the case of saying what in the world it is? Goochelaar (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it?
Talk:Absolution

message: Since Lutheranism predates Reformed traditions and is closer in thinking to Western and Eastern Catholicism, I have moved it up. I have also modified the text of the section.--Drboisclair 04:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lutheran section 

message: There ought to be a special section on sins that only the Pope is said to be able to absolve. ADM (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any? He might be required to intervene to overrule some point of canon law or revoke some high-ranking excommunication, but my understanding is that any priest can absolve sins  it's just that they might get in trouble with the higher-ups if they're breaking canon law by doing so. And of course, there's always Divine Grace, regardless.  — LlywelynII 12:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Papal absolution

message: Please note that the reference provided in the article supports the statement that Lutherans reject "those who teach that forgiveness of sin is not obtained through faith but through the satisfactions made by man."
See, the reference (the page linked above) is actually an encyclopedia entry describing penance, and most of the entry refers to Roman Catholic beliefs.  The entire page should not be confused with a statement of what Lutherans believe regarding penance.  The last paragraph of the entry, however, is taken directly from the Augsburg Confession, and thus, it is a statement of what Lutherans believe regarding penance.  --Hamitr (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lutheran view of penance 

message: We've got to mention them. Free absolution-for-killing is the cross Xians've gotten beaten over the head with for decades now: since (unlike Judaism or Islam) it pretty much directly contradicts the faith's foundational scriptures, we should explain how it got justified in the first place & what justifications or excuses Xians now offer on the subject.  — LlywelynII 12:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. -- Beland (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Crusades
Talk:Murder of Yusef Hawkins

message: . . .  to conform more closely to the actual N.Y. Times news reports.
* cause of the confrontation
* no NYT mention of a 'street gang'
* not all the suspects were of Italian descent
* the many repetitions of 'Italian-American' make for POV
* the hyphenated-American background of the entire crowd involved is not known.
Yes, a terrible crime was committed that night, but I think this entire article could stand a POV review.  --CliffC 04:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revising opening paragraphs
Talk:Wilam Hall

message: I have removed the whole section that read:-
"Another integral element of Medley Hall is the philosophy of ruckus that underpins all that takes place within the college. Ruckus is a simple principle, seen more as a lifestyle than a strict set of rules undertaken by the students. Responsibility for ruckus lies in the hands of the ruckus committee."
It is completely unclear what it is about or whether it is notable. It has no sources. The link goes nowhere really. Do not put it back unless you can demonstrate that it deserves to be in an encyclopedia and meets our policies and guidelines. --Bduke 23:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruckus 

message: These are some possible online sources I may come back to add in later. 
From a Real Estate news site. 
https://www.domain.com.au/news/the-best-storyteller-in-grand-old-carlton-20140403-360o1/
From a tour company blog. 
https://twistedhistory.net.au/2018/05/30/the-knowing-2-2/
From an architecture blog. 
https://www.adonline.id.au/buildings/medley-hall/
There may be information here not covered elsewhere, but is a primary source. 
https://medleyhall.unimelb.edu.au/about/history
There is conflicting information about whether this was built in 1892 or 1983. I might look further into this and see if the National Library of Australia has anything. 
Tank (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: This part of the article, "following the govt of the name "Wilam" by the Wurundjeri Council", makes no sense, but I do not know how to improve it. Bduke (talk) 06:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Collegio di Spagna

message: The article on college does not list a (modern) meaning for the word that would fit this institution. This sounds more like a student nation. -- Petri Krohn 10:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a college in the medieval sense, as at the University of Paris until the French revolution, and as the colleges that still exist at Oxford and Cambridge (allowing for regional differences). The Wikipedia "college" article is all crap and nothing to go by. There were four nations in medieval Bologna, as there were in Paris, but this is not one of them.  up+land 10:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Studium already in XII century there were more than 30 subnationes more and less each with its College. The spanish were divided in natio Hispanorum and natio Cathelanorum (mainly to count more on the elections, which counted by nations and not by head). Not all the spanish were hosted in the Colledio di Spagna. --Biopresto 10:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Collage or Student nation?
Talk:St Laurence's Church, Ludlow

message: I have adjusted citations to this work, inserting applicable page numbers. I changed one (about the misericords) from 42 to 11 because the edition I possess (1980) only runs to 15 pages of finely printed text of four columns per page.Cloptonson (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations to David Lloyd ''History and  a Guide'' to the church
Talk:Northland Shopping Centre

message: I think that a user should upload a newer version of the Northland Shopping Centre logo. The current logo being used dates back to a few years ago. The 
new logo can be found on the shopping centre's website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BattleBall (talk • contribs) 07:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Logo:
Talk:Taichung Intercontinental Baseball Stadium

message: I would love to fix up the page, and once Internet links become available (which I expect to be soon,) I will provide them.  As of now, the info comes from material published locally (I am a Taichung resident) and with what I just saw a few hours ago.  I will post a photo I took this morning within the next couple of days.
How do I "categorize" a page?  I have never done that before.
Thanks.
Sorry, I forgot to sign the above message.
Ludahai 09:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix up the page

message: The stadium is accessible in Google Street View.  There are 360 degree views from the pitchers mound, home plate, the bleachers and concourses. https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=24.200079,120.685242&spn=0.01,0.01&t=m&q=24.200079,120.685242  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.253.120 (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Street View
Talk:Delaware and Hudson Gravity Railroad

message: I only contribute to these talk pages to complain, so I'd better start off with a compliment.  There is much deep information here, and there appears to be deep authority behind it.
As for your discussion in FNs 1 and 2 of the criteria to be considered in expressing railroad firsts, you dare to buck a miserable trend. Few sources bring up those issues.  They just spew some vague first, in rhetoric likely specious, and blithely move on.  Not you.  Bravo.
That said, my perennial complaint is that again and again I come to Wikipedia to answer—not a specialized, but an elementary question—and it fails me:
1.  Were the stationary steam engines online from the get-go, in 1829?  If so, state it.  If not, state the year they came online.
2.  Aren't they the first, or almost the first, "steam engines used for rail operation in the Western hemisphere?"  I mean, that's something to crow about.  Well, then, crow.
I hate to pass thru that dreaded airlock out into the cold vacuum of non-Wiki space to confirm 1829 or not, but unfor. I have to.
Cordially,
Jimlue (talk) 22:25, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Steam
Talk:Hoga (YT-146)

message: parts of this article need to be re-written on chronological order.  This will avoid the repetitation of certain statements.  Hmains 06:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: chronology

message: This article lacks a lead as per WP:LEAD. The lead paragraph is supposed to summarise information given in the rest of the article. The lead of this article, however, not only does not summarise the rest of the article but also includes information not found elsewhere in the article. Furthermore, the article digresses on topics not immediately relevant to the topic, like a rather detailed narrative of the actions of the USS Nevada at Pearl Harbor. Thirdly, this section: 
Throwing lines to the stricken repair ship, Hoga helped pull Vestal away from Arizona at 8:30 hours (military time is cited throughout this study). 
The phrase "this study" makes me suspect this is either copy-vio or original research, both of which are not to be included on Wikipedia. This is obviously inconclusive evidence, but I find it enough grounds for rejection of the article for GA. Lastly, the article could use some more inline citations, though this is not as critical as the previous issues. Druworos 12:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA nom
Talk:Sporran

message: It took 5 days from someone removing the "misconceptions" section to someone frivolously putting one of them into the main body of the text as a "fact". It would be nice to stop this page descending back into the shortbread-tin fantasy it was a couple of years ago. Please provide citation notes rather than deleting sections wholesale  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmackaerospace (talk • contribs) 00:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Misconceptions

message: When playing golf, driving a car, dancing or engaging in any activity where a heavy pouch might hurt, the wearer often turns the sporran and chain around the waist to let it hang on his hip in a more casual position.
This is not speculation, this is what one does. Try to drive with a sporran digging into your belly, and you will see the need to spin the thing to the side. It is also spun to the side when using a urinal too, but I'm not sure how to word that in an encyclopedic fashion. -Dr Haggis - Talk 05:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text of interest

message: I've just removed all the anecdotal rubbish, along with the stuff that is plain wrong. I think it would be good to put in a section called "common misconceptions about the sporran" because, guess what, the web is now full of pages that basicly quote wikipedia verbatim on this junk. The one thing that is quite interesting is the story of how 'the sporran as armour' myth got started.... Jmackaerospace (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: removing complete rubbish

message: I can recall reading somewhere that a Leather Sporran was traditionally worn during the day, and a fur one at night..  As I recall, it was something of a serious faux pa for Americans of Scottish decent to wear the wrong sporran at the wrong time.  Anyone know anything about this? (Sorry, I wasn't logged in when I first posted this question..!) Dphilp75 (talk) 00:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Day VS Night Sporran

message: Most sporrans have two, three, or five tassels. A picture in Scotland Magazine Issue 51 July/August 2010 shows a clan chief wearing an eight tassle sporran that reaches his knees, with a row of five tassles above a row of three.
What determines who can wear what number of tassels? How must they be arranged? GilesW (talk) 12:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tassle protocol 

message: I just now removed the hyperlink cantle and left it as a plain word - because the word "cantle" redirects to Saddle which tells nothing about a sporran's cantle. Could someone please state "very early" in the article the various technical parts of a sporran, and define these parts, and perhaps provide an illustration (a picture of a sporran with labeled arrows pointing to the various parts maybe?)? This would help the reader to understand better what is being talked about the first time "cantle" is mentioned later in the article many times. Thank you so much. Fallendarlin (talk) 11:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  the word "cantle" needs a definition or illustration early in the article
Talk:SF (Australian TV channel)

message: Who thinks the channel will be good? I do. TV1 doesn't have enough space for their shows so having a Sci Fi Channel will be good. Belevsquad 05:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a talk page for discussion about the article only. Irrelevant posts about channel content will be removed. No idea about the logo their official site displays that logo though. They would license the name so probably the logo too. - Mike Beckham 05:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree with that...this channel's owner TV1 has it's list of programming within the main article so I would go by that. --Mikecraig 10:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sci Fi Channel Australia

message: I pulled this quote off the following website 
The article lists TV1 as the owner anybody know the actual arrangment. Hossen27 05:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner 

message: It says in the article that the channel Will be available to Foxtel Digital subscribers on the “Laughter & Living” and “My Escape” package tiers. It is my understanding that Foxtel said to be offered to those only with Platnium and anyone else with other packages would need to purchase it as a separate channel (eg: Adults Only or RAI). --Lakeyboy 01:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subscription package required

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 02:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion 
Talk:Spectrum London

message: I'd propose that the gallery itself is incidental to the controversy, which should probably be the article subject.  The gallery is mentioned as an afterthought in one of the references, and not at all in the other. It didn't seem notable enough to be the subject of an article.  --Steve 05:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly disagree. There is quite enough to justify a stub. Furthermore, the gallery has had previous publicity and exhibits other artists of note also. The gallery is cited in a number of articles regarding this particular show. The gallery director has spoken out and been quoted in the press regarding it. Galleries are notable because of what they engender. Otherwise we wouldn't have articles on any art galleries — we'd just have articles on the artists they exhibit or the paintings they show. Tyrenius 05:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

text: It's blatant advertising for a non-notable entity. --Steve 06:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WFIU

message: I am not sure WFIU was the only PBS station in Indiana to broadcast classical music almost exclusively in the year 1973, according to the article. - But was it really 1973,  when they started doing this?  I think according to George Walker, it was 1974. 
Also besides the topic above, the IU station should look at how much airtime to classical music was on in their 1974 program guide. 
--65.54.155.14 05:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect History
Talk:HSBC Bank Australia

message: The article on HSBC could benefit from some more historical information. This bank set up at one of the most interesting times in Australian banking history - the time that foreign banks were allowed to establish for the first time. It would be worth adding information on this, plus some short notes on key development since then. If this seems OK I can add this information.
Options110 08:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled