Talk:Iontophoresis

message: Hint for improvement: please try to find easier terms. I am a PhD and studied English, even though English is not my mother tounge, but I cannot get close to this issue as I hardly understand the words. How shall "normal" international readers achieve knowlegde through this kind of technical language - especially in the first sentences?
Dr. C. Schmidt  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.153.229.142 (talk) 08:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this page should not be obliterated, it is completely different from electrophoresis. Iontophoresis is a part of medical electrotherapy, which is a part of establised medical physical therapy. It has nothing to do with PAGE-electrophoresis and separation  of macromolecules for biochemical purpose. Someone should extend the article on medical application. Iontophoresis is based on the Stangerbad, developed by Sere, as reported by Lehr(Die hydro-electrischen Baeder; Wiesbaden, 1885) and reestablished by a German tanner from Ulm (GER), named Stanger.Robi123 21:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is also a cosmetic device that uses Iontophoresis to deliver nutrients to tissues.  The small electric current is also said to break up fatty tissues and can also reduce acne and scars.  I do not know of any non-commercial links that describe this technology, however. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.126.254.120 (talk) 06:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cosmetic Use

message: Is the described treatment really iontophoresis?  It doesn't sound like any drug or other charged substance is being delivered beyond the water itself, and the idea of reversing the current makes no sense at all in the context of iontophoresis.  It would just remove the same things being infused in the first phase.  One of the references refers to "weakly mineralized water", but that's unconvincing; and neither reference is available online.  It sounds to me like it may actually be a form of electrotherapy, with the electricity being the active agent - so maybe it should be described on that page instead of here, notwithstanding that the company that markets the device calls their process "iontophoresis." 67.158.73.188 05:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No response in months, and it's pretty clear that the described treatment is "iontophoresis" only in the minds of its vendors.  Deleting the advertising. 216.75.190.160 03:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment of hyperhidrosis 

message: A Google search for iontophoretic+neuron demonstrates another usage of the term in neuro-electrophysiological research. This sense of the word should be included in the article (I don't consider myself enough of an expert to write the addition). Here's another web page that describes it:
http://members.aol.com/kations/iontophoresis/iontobasics.html
Bayle Shanks (talk) 22:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage in neuro-electrophysiological research 

message: The term iontophoresis is well established in the literature of pure science. Perhaps it also has a place in the "medical literature" (I don't know), as suggested by most of this article. I just stumbled on this article because I was Wiki-editing in the physics of non-equilibrium thermodynamics and I wanted to link to iontophoresis which came into what I was editing. That's why I added to this article a note about the more or less non-medical use of the term. I am not interested in chasing this up.Chjoaygame (talk) 11:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  iontophoresis 

message: Editor SiriusChico has made an edit. It is the only item in his list of contributions. It has various technical flaws. I am concerned at the appearance that Editor SiriusChico might be engaging in some kind of self-or-related-party promotion here. I would like to see on this page some evidence that such is not the case. I have deleted an external link to a commercial advertisement.Chjoaygame (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  new edit 

message: This Technology Review article mentions a bunch of different applications. Have any of these companies succeeded? Any word on why they might have failed? -- Beland (talk) 03:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update on more applications