Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Minnesota/Archive 1

message: I am seeking help to design the infobox that will appear on the article pages. The information to appear in the box is on this project page. Station Attendant 22:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox template 

message: I'm willing to help out with the WikiProject: Minnesota State Highways.  I'm new to creating Wikipedia articles, but I'm sure I'll get the hang of it.
I live in central Minnesota, so I'd be willing to supply information about highways that serve around my area (Brainerd, St. Cloud, etc.), as needed.
I tried my luck, updating the MN-371 and by creating the article for MN-301, hopefully according to the standards of using the infobox on the page.  I would appreciate it if whoever is in charge with this project lets me know if I'm doing things the right way, or what I should do to fix anything.  My only question was, am I supposed to superimpose the route number of the Highway shield sign?  If so, what font/size am I supposed to use, or do I just guess and check?
Thanks
SpaceJunkie 02:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure about the signs... you're doing good so far.  goes on the article talk page though. Also you can just do spaces instead of the underscore in links. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  02:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpaceJunkie wants to help with the WP:MNSH 

message: Hi, I created a SVG for the Minnesota State Route Marker. The colors should be right, an also the aspect ratios - if not, give me the right rgb colors and I'll fix that. Since I'm not from the U.S. I'm not too keen on making a SVG for every PNG Image out there ... but, if anyone neads help, drop me a line @ de:Benutzer:Ucc.
In the commons I added a new category (commons:Category:Minnesota_State_Route_markers) an I allready created a marker for Route 62: 
If you want me to rename the Images or the categorys in the commons, just tell me. --ucc 10:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I renamed them to the MN-xx.svg convention (:Image:MN-62.svg) and I'll upload a template to the Commons. --ucc 21:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minnesota State Route Marker 

message: Many articles covered by this WikiProject lack photographs. As part of a subcategorization of the requested photos category, there is now a category for Minnesota articles needing photos - to use it, just add  to the article's talk page. I have only added a few articles to the category so far, but it would be an easy way to make an extensive list Minnesota-related articles lacking photos. I hope you find it useful! TheGrappler 06:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Minnesota]]

message: * I am working on the Minnesota State Highway 16 infobox to put shields in at the termini, Dexter and La Crescent. The one for Dexter is going to be the I-90 shield, but how should I do the one for La Crescent? Should I just leave it blank or use  for Wisconsin 16? --Station Attendant 21:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * I'd use  for Wisconsin Highway 16.  Actually, at List of crossings of the Upper Mississippi River, it also includes the shields for U.S. Route 14 and U.S. Route 61 where MN-16 crosses the river, if you feel like adding those two in there as well.  Come to think of it, a link to the bridge article would be appropriate.  --Elkman - (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox terminus shields 

message: MNDOT is occasionally inconsistent:
* Rest areas at 210, 60, 61 say "Minnesota State Highway x"
* The rest area at Gooseberry Falls has abbreviations for "MN61" and "TH 61" (Minnesota 61 and Trunk Highway 61, I'm guessing).  (The title calls it "Goosebury Falls", which is a misspelling.) 
* This Mn/DOT news release says that the bridge being replaced is "Highway 25", but the detours are on "State Highways 19 and 5".
* This news release refers to Trunk Highway 87 and Trunk Highway 64.
* A search for "trunk highway" returns 3015 results.  A search for "state highway" returns 1451 results.
From a legal perspective, the following are important:
* Minnesota Statutes 161.114 - Constitutional trunk routes (the Babcock Amendment)
* Minnesota Statutes 161.115 - Additional trunk highways
* Minnesota Statutes 161.117 - Trunk highways; additional routes.  In other words, the Commissioner of Transportation can declare these routes without any further authorization from the state.  Route 380 would follow Shepard Road to either Robert Street or the Lafayette Freeway (I'm not sure which) to connect to Interstate 94, but that has never been built.  Route 382 appears to be Interstate 35E between West Seventh Street and Kellogg Boulevard in downtown St. Paul.  Route 383 is the section of U.S. Route 169 between Interstate 494 and Interstate 694 (formerly County Road 18).  Route 384 appears to be State Highway 62 (Minnesota) between Interstate 494 and State Highway 55 (Minnesota) near the airport.
* Minnesota Statutes 161.12 defines the Interstate routes.  Route 390 is Interstate 35 (and Interstate 35E (Minnesota) through the Twin Cities), Route 391 is Interstate 90, Route 392 is Interstate 94, Route 393 is Interstate 494 and Interstate 694, and Route 394 is Interstate 35W (Minnesota).  Routes 395 and 396 appear to be extensions of Interstate 35 through Duluth.  I think that means that Interstate 535 is part of Route 390.
I'm presenting this as information only, not as endorsement of any particular system of naming.  In other words, someone else can figure it out.  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 04:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Minnesota Code of Agency Rules shows terminology used by state agencies.  For example, certain fishing areas are defined by a type of metes-and-bounds description with formats like this: " . . .  thence north to U.S. Highway No. [x]; thence east to State Highway No. [y]; thence south to County Highway No. [z], . . "..  That section was not promulgated by MnDOT, but does show how another state agency distinguishes between federal, state, and county highways in setting regulations for the public. Kablammo 06:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References from the MNDOT site

message: The differences of opinion on terminology are reflected on changes made in other pages, including those for Minnesota State Highways 33 and 16.
In the interests of having relevant discussion in one place, I reprint here the (current) discussion page from the latter highway:
[Start of MN 16 Talk Page]
=== Nomenclature ===
I changed the opening sentence to read:
"Minnesota State Highway 16, also referred to as Trunk Highway 16 or TH 16, is a two lane highway in Southeast Minnesota that follows the route of Old U.S. Highway 16."
The use of the term "State Highway" is consistent with Minnesota usage, and also helps distinguish this road from Houston County Highway 16.  Kablammo 22:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the first "Minnesota", as it is bad grammar. "Minnesota's State Highway 16" would be fine but redundant in this case. --SPUI (T - C) 00:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on terminology 

message: I changed the opening sentence to read:
"Minnesota State Highway 16, also referred to as Trunk Highway 16 or TH 16, is a two lane highway in Southeast Minnesota that follows the route of Old U.S. Highway 16."
The use of the term "State Highway" is consistent with Minnesota usage, and also helps distinguish this road from Houston County Highway 16.  Kablammo 22:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the first "Minnesota", as it is bad grammar. "Minnesota's State Highway 16" would be fine but redundant in this case. --SPUI (T - C) 00:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature 

message: Your state is invited to participate in discussions for its highway naming convention. Please feel free to participate in this discussion. If you already have a convention that follows the State Name Type xx designation, it is possible to request an exemption as well. Thanks! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)  00:26, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll/Part2]]

message: Since there was controversy on WT:USSH over what the common name of Minnesota state highways are, polls have reopened regarding the common name. See WT:USSH to comment or vote. The poll will close at 11:59 PM UTC on October 8. Thanks. --TMF T - C 14:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended part II voting 

message: I submitted a question to the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the official naming of Minnesota highways.  Here is the response from Jerry Baldwin, Library Director.  (My original questions are in bold.)
----
The question you submitted to info@dot.state.mn.us was forwarded to Mn/DOT Library for a response.
1.  Is the official name of a highway of the form "Minnesota State Highway x", "State Highway x", "Trunk Highway x", or something else?
I can find no document specifying what constitutes an "official name" in relation to numbered highways that constitute the state highway system.  In almost all state documents the individual highways are referred to as "THx."  The use of the designation "TH" or "Trunk Highway" began with the amendment to the Minnesota Constitution ( http://worldcat.org/oclc/8294090 ) that created the system of highways administered by the state, adopted in 1920, and has been used in subsequent legislation ( http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/161 ).
2.  If the official name of a highway does not start with "Minnesota", is it acceptable to refer to highways as "Minnesota State Highway x" in a work like Wikipedia that is used within all 50 states, as well as outside the USA?
The use of the state name preceding a highway number is common practice, but is not designated as "official" or "acceptable" in relation to Minnesota highways.  There might be legislation in other states that adopt "offical" designations.
3.  Are there any good examples of publications, such as AASHTO documents, that refer to multiple state highway systems that could be used as a preference for this discussion?
AASHTO has issued, and from time to time updates a publication titled "United States Numbered Highways" ( http://worldcat.org/oclc/37586174 ).  However, that policy document applies only to the designation and signing of the system of U.S and Interstate highways and provides for consistent numbering and signing of highways that cross state borders or are part of the Interstate highway system.  Standards for the numbering and signing of highways wholly within any given state vary from state to state.
 
Please let me know if I can be of further help.
----
--Elkman - (Elkspeak) 18:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response from the Minnesota Department of Transportation 

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.  B2T2 22:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: What's the best way to do county road shields? We have some counties using only the blue pentagon (i.e. Ramsey), some using just the white square (usually rural) and some that use both (i.e. Washington). I did read somewhere that the pentagon is used for CSAHs and the square for normal county roads. Should we pick one or the other as a standard? Or try to go by each county's usage? Something else?  --Sable232 17:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think shield usage depends on the county, for example Scott county uses all pentagonal, and Dakota county uses pentagons on "major county roads (usually ones that cross the whole county)", and square on others.  Personaly I think each road article created should use the shiled that the county is using to mark the road. --MNAdam 20:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds good, as long as we can find out which one to use. For now I'll concentrate on the pentagons as they are needed. The square county shield blank I made looks pretty bad. --Sable232 07:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this page: List of highway shields in the United States, it has some shields that could be converted into county shields. --MNAdam 18:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  County Road shields 

message: Infoboxes are now in on nearly every state highway article. The only exceptions are a couple of the very short routes serving state institutions. --Sable232 21:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 16:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Since there's been no activity here in months, do we want to archive this whole page manually so we can preserve the page history?
Secondly, is automatic archiving really necessary since there is hardly any activity here? --Sable232 00:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving 

message: As far as I can tell, all the old PNG highway name shields have been replaced with SVG shields.  Since that's been done, I've nominated the old PNG images for deletion at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 June 22#Image:MNHighway100.png.  If you have any objections, you might want to voice them at the link.  I doubt this is going to be controversial, though.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominating old shield images for deletion 

message: We should come to an agreement on how to format the termini in the infobox. Right now there are two different ways, and it would be nice to standardize them.
#  (city)
#  MN-1 in (city)
I prefer the first one. Since the termini are already linked to in prose, the extra link isn't entirely necessary. Having "MN-1" there is redundant to the shield. Not to mention the first one takes up less space. --Sable232 18:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The second one, since having an image without the text is bad for accessibility, and means that someone wanting to click has to hunt for the link in the text. --NE2 01:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Termini formatting 

message: All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master sonT - C 16:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates

message: Can someone get a photo of the parkway section of Interstate 35E, either from a car or from above? Thank you. --NE2 01:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: For some odd reason the name of the easternmost mile of Highway 7, running from its intersection with Highway 100 to its eastern terminus at the intersection of France Avenue and Lake Street, was changed to Highway 25 some years ago (I don't know the exact date).  Nonetheless, street signs along a "service road" still identify it as Highway 7.  Why does any of that make sense? Michael Hardy 04:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern end of Highway 7 

message: In response to a few issues that came up, we are giving a reminder to all state highway wikiprojects and task forces:
# Each project needs to remain aware of developments at WT:USRD and subpages to ensure that each project is aware of decisions / discussions that affect that project. It is impossible to notify every single project about every single discussion that may affect it. Therefore, it is the state highway wikiproject's responsiblity to monitor discussions.
# If a project does not remain aware of such developments and complains later, then there is most likely nothing USRD can do about it.
# USRD, in most to nearly all cases, will not interfere with a properly functioning state highway wikiproject. All projects currently existing are "properly functioning" for the purposes mentioned here. All task forces currently existing are not "properly functioning" (that is why they are task forces). Departments of USRD (for example, MTF, shields, assessment, INNA) may have specific requirements for the state highway wikiprojects, but complaints regarding those need to be taken up with those departments.
# However, this is a reminder that USRD standards need to be followed by the state highway wikiprojects, regardless of the age of the wikiproject.
Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 05:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reminder from USRD

message: Yesterday I worked at filling in the gap in the exit list for I-94.  I was wondering if we add in exits for rest areas?  http://www.dot.state.mn.us/restareas/ has a list of all the rest areas in Minnesota.  If so, do we just state "Rest Area" or give the specific name?  Also, I did end up making the county road shields for the exits in Wright, Stearns, Todd and Douglas counties.  I hope I did it right.. although I know that all the blue pentagon shields in my end of the state use white lettering, so that's how I made mine.
Also, US 10 looks like it could use an exit list makeover, except I'm not sure what the format is supposed to look like, since outside of the Twin Cities, it's pretty much all at-grade intersections except for around Sauk Rapids, Little Falls, and a few main intersections heading towards Moorhead.
And a few questions about termini:
In our TH 18 article, it has the eastern terminus at I-35.  I think that TH 18 might actually end at TH 23 about a half mile west of I-35.  In addition to the route log, the Pine County map on the MnDOT site doesn't show any sign of 18 going to the interstate: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/maps/cadd/county/pine2.pdf, and although 18 is signed with 23 on the I-35 exit, it's probably just as a guide since TH 18 is basically right nearby.
Also, it appears as if TH 28 runs concurrent with TH 27 into Little Falls.  Looking at the route log it says TH 28 is "COINCIDENT WITH MNTH 27 FROM REFERENCE POINTS 123+00.234 TO 135+00.150", which means that TH 28 would end at Lindbergh Dr / CSAH 52 in Little Falls (which was the former routing of Highway 10 many years back).
From the times I've been in Little Falls, I can remember that 28 is co-signed with 27 at least to the east of the TH 238 intersection, but once you get into Little Falls I don't remember 28 being signed very well, if at all.
The Little Falls map on the Mn/DOT site makes it appear as if TH 28 ends closer to the Mississippi River, but I'd still guess it ends at Lindbergh Dr.
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/maps/cadd/city/Over5000/littlefalls.pdf
Here's a Minnesota Highway Ends site with the guy having the same termini for the highways as I mentioned above:
http://ajfroggie.com/roadpics/mn-ends/mn018.htmhttp://ajfroggie.com/roadpics/mn-ends/mn028.htm
If you want me to make any of those changed, I gladly will, or will not.
Thanks,SpaceJunkie (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard is Wikipedia:Manual of Style (exit lists); generally rest areas bad, service areas maybe. For a non-freeway, you can do something like U.S. Route 101 in California (ignore the mileage by county) or something like Oregon Route 58. I recently redid List of Minnesota state highways, "starting over" and getting termini from Mn/DOT sources, and I agree with you on both routes you mention. --NE2 05:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few things with exits & route termini 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: From the same interstate issue with Maryland althoguh now Minnesota uses neutral shields, the stat-nmae specific is still display quite a bit on alot of 2 di-numbers. I-35, I-90, and I-94 still commonly display state-name specific. Its okay to use it on route summary section only which is almost history section only when image show 100 px only. From 25x20px it will definitely not be okay to use it, neither as other infobox stuff. Interstate-Guide shade that state in black meaning it uses neutral shields, but the states have little or almost no state-specific is list on the bottom of interstate-guide page. Minnesota is obviously not on that list.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 01:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstates in Minnesota 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Minnesota road transport 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Does your project care about what happens to the talk pages of articles that have been replaced with redirects?  If so, please provide your input at User:Mikaey/Request for Input/ListasBot 3.  Thanks, Matt (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Does your WikiProject care about talk pages of redirects?

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Ok, so I was playing around with something. WOSlinker is in the process of consolidating all of the various infobox variants to use just . That got me to thinking that CA and WA have parameters set up to list the legal definition of the highways from their statutes. The 4 sections of the Minnesota Statutes that define the various Constitutional Routes and Legislative Routes are now listed on Wikisource. 
*Minnesota Statutes/Section 161.114
*Minnesota Statutes/Section 161.115
*Minnesota Statutes/Section 161.117
*Minnesota Statutes/Section 161.12
The second part is slightly confusing, but it works this way because it is using code set up for CA and WA, and the terminology doesn't match up perfectly. If you know what subsection of MS §161 defines the highway, enter that in the section parameter of the infobox. If the highway is completely defined by one CR/LR, then you can input the subdivision that lists the definition as the subsection. As long as the |section parameter is defined, it will produce the link, if the |subsection parameter is also defined, then it will link to the specific part of the statute. MN 610 is Route 333 in the Minnesota Statutes § 161.115(264). So for that article, input |section=115 |subsection=264, and the infobox links to Minnesota Statutes/Section 161.115#Subdivision 264 with the nicer looking MS § 161.115(264) link in the infobox. Imzadi 1979 →  07:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox additions 

message: There are several short highways that only exist to connect state parks or prisons to the rest of the trunk highway network. I'd like to propose merging them together into a single list. The existing articles would be converted to redirects to the appropriate sections of the list.  would be used in each section, although subsections for the RD and History wouldn't be needed. If the highway doesn't have any other junctions with state highways except its termini, a junction list would not be needed either. It would be similar to Former Michigan spur routes in execution, browsers optional. Thoughts? Imzadi 1979 →  19:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been thinking the exact same thing. I've looked through those articles and I don't think any of them could be expanded beyond a stub, and even if so none of them would ever go past start-class on account of not actually having major junctions outside of termini (and sometimes only one of those is a road). Since there's a solid criteria for inclusion (state hospitals, prisons, and parks) it should work. --Sable232 (talk) 03:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone through and checked which highways fit the bill. Here's the ones that have articles: 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 297, 298, 299, 301, 309, 329, 330, 333. These don't: 288, 296, 300, 302, 303, 323. --Sable232 (talk) 23:24, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I redirected all of the old articles, and cleaned up the infoboxes. As for formatting, I'd suggest just trying to make every section a few paragraphs. One as a "lead", maybe a second for the "route description", if there is enough for a separate paragraph, and a third for the history. The small infoboxes don't need links to highways really, but they can be added back if desired. If so, use the  template though, since that creates the correct formatting for the graphics with the correct links and abbreviations. Imzadi 1979 →  06:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Minnesota state highways serving state institutions]]