lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sherwood Park

message: Sherwood Park, Alberta → Sherwood Park – Sherwood Park only page about a community on disambiguation page and just typing Sherwood Park brings you here.Kyle1278 (talk) 00:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: How is this calculated? What's the source? The word 'hamlet' means different things in different countries. - Aucitypops (talk) 09:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been re-branded as a "urban service area". So was Fort McMurray, which has more people. Statement removed. --Qyd (talk) 13:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest hamlet in the world 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Ucucha 06:54, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move_2 

message: This section seems more than a little biased.
161.19.64.243 (talk) 20:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Biased towards/against what? 117Avenue (talk) 23:30, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The sports section needs to be heavily updated. I live in Sherwood Park, and have been playing football for years. That info as been there for a long time, and as a firsthand source I tried editing the section. Someone changed it back to information from around 2005/06. Chasmosaurus13 (talk) 15:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You as a first hand source is original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Any new additions to the Sports section should have cited sources that are considered reliable to maintain Wikipedia's policy of verifiability. Hwy43 (talk) 04:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports 

message: The mayoral section needs to be updated to reflect Roxanne Carr's win of the recent municipal election, but i'm terrible at sourcing info. Could anyone help me with the process? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasmosaurus13 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Carr doesn't become mayor until she's sworn in. 117Avenue (talk) 05:36, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayor
Talk:Mahaveer School

message: From VfD:
Once again, I can't resist.  This time, it's a grade school.  Non-native English, too.  Check out the name of the corresponding redirect:  Shri Mahaveer Digamber Jain Senior Secondary School. - Lucky 6.9 05:51, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Side-Comment: I have not been here as long as many who vote on this page have, but I am in total agreement with the previous statement. Notability is an arguable subject. Also, we (those who vote on the basis of notability when it is in question) are not elitists, but if you let everything and anything have its own entry, this beautiful project goes from a heirarchy of what is seen as credible knowledge to a scattered mess of this and that information. I do not feel my time is well-spent in working to make Wikipedia better if the latter is going to be the outcome. Skyler 00:42, Aug 12, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete. Non-notable. Note: Just because there are a lot of entries of inappropriate content, this does not give reason to keep others. I have seen the "If you delete this, than you'll have to delete that..." argument far too often as an excuse to keep. From my understanding, the point of this page is to improve Wikipedia and keep it respectable. Other similar tolerated content should not be used as an argument, they should be listed here as well. Skyler 18:44, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. Would be included in an unabridged encyclopedia of religious schools. Information probably useful for those researching: Jainism, architecture of the Johari Bazaar, or the historic legacy of Sawai Man Singh Bahadur. Remember: just because you personally find no need for an article, doesn't mean it can't useful to someone else. Needs cleanup, though for format and context. Davodd 20:10, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
** Keep. Agreed w/ Davodd. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:25, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: This article seems to be made for promo of the school I mean does the lay reader really need to know the version of computers used in the school .....ehFORCE RADICAL (talk) 06:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article seems to contain promo material
Talk:Charley Steiner

message: He will turn 75 in August 2024:  https://dodgerblue.com/dodgers-broadcaster-charley-steiner-back-injury-misses-dodger-stadium-opener/2024/03/28/ 74.88.37.10 (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steiner's Age
Talk:List of unsolved problems in mathematics

message: There was a 2021 edit at the start of the set theory section that reads a little odd. It reads
* Note: These conjectures are about models of Zermelo-Frankel set theory with choice, and may not be able to be expressed in models of other set theories such as the various constructive set theories or non-wellfounded set theory.
Given any FOL Set theory (many here List_of_first-order_theories#Set_theories) with the same signature (the bulk just works with \in and not more), a problem expressed in the language is the same for any of them. What's probably meant here is (and that's my proposed replacement)
* The notable conjectures in the subject of set theory were typically formulated in the context of Zermelo-Frankel set theory, and usually with Choice. By the completeness theorem, the problems may be understood as concerning the models thereof. The provability of the conjectures listed below might not be open in other set theories, such as ones over a logic or with axioms that are weaker, stronger or conflicting with it (e.g. a constructive set theory, Tarski-Grothendieck set theory resp. a non-wellfounded set theory.)
In fact the middle sentence mentioning models is probably even redundant also.
--178.115.55.162 (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Set theory note 

message: "Problems solved since 1995" was recently changed to "problems solved in the last 30 years".  I think the former title should be used.  See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Statements_likely_to_become_outdated.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the MoS outline, agreed. GalacticShoe (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 18:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in section title
Talk:Ellendale, Minnesota

message: Does it really qualify as a city with 590 people? --Sam Francis
"Village" Is the correct term for Ellendale. --[Cole Mullenmaster]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.197.180.155 (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Albanian Greek Catholic Church

message: Does anyone has an estimation of the numbers? is there any particular area where they are concentrated? Thanks. Mountolive | Talk 05:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the are part of the Arbëreshë community in Italy, while the ones in Albania are not as numerous.--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: There is currently an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Catholic Church)#RfC: should this page be made a naming convention that may be of interest. Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic Church naming conventions RfC
Talk:Carathéodory's theorem (convex hull)

message: Just wondering why this is considered to be a low priority article. I always thought Caratheodory's theorem was a "famous" result. 202.36.179.66 (talk) 22:17, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a famous and important result, which is considered a prototype for geometric transversality theory, 52A35 in the mathematics subjects classification system. I upgraded it to "mid" priority. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low priority 
Talk:Gargish

message: I wanted to point out an error on this page, but feel that I lack the experience and knowledge to actually correct it.
The Gargish langauge is NOT the language of Britannian magick.  That would be the Britannian langauge, which is called Runic in game.
Each Runic character has a "word of power" associated with it, which are used to form the magic spells.
:You're getting confused between the scripts and the languages. In the entire Ultima series, the Runic alphabet is only ever used to translate English words. However, the Gargish script is used to write words in an actual Gargish language. Twenty-six of these words of the Gargish language have been chosen to correspond to the twenty-six single-letter runes of the Britannian Runic script. These twenty-six Gargish words are the so-called "words of power". Neither the runic script nor the Ophidian script is actually a "language" - they are no more than second-level writing systems used to encode English. Gargish is actually more developed than this, and is a proper language on a par with, say, Klingon. That's why, even if you know the Gargish alphabet, you still can't translate the Gargish signs and books of Ultima VI directly into English. (Try it sometime if you don't believe me.) thefamouseccles 13:15, 09 Apr 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anarchist communism

message: , re your recent edits: can I urge you not to delete uncited material, but to tag it as needing citation unless you have reason to doubt it, and give editors time to see if they can find citations (rather than relying on them to check the edit history). Some of the material deleted appears to be sourced in the linked articles - e.g. I think this is the case of the material about Zapata. If nobody furnishes a citation for tagged material, it can go later. BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, feel free to delete unreliable sources from the article but please, don't remove such huge chunks of the article with no prior  tagging. Being quick in deleting unreliably sourced material is pretty easy as opposed to searching for reliable sources for potentially true information. -Vipz (talk) 22:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we add cn tags instead of deleting? 

message: Hi Gugrak, much of this section is badly written to the point of impenetrability. If you're keen to retain it, please improve it. Stara Marusya (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizationalism vs. insurrectionarism and expansion
Talk:Larry Mullen Jr.

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 20:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Larry Mullen Jr. →  – Article title has been stable until Dicklyon has tried to move it. Despite his claims, MOS:JR is not a strict rule but a recommendation. Just like the recommendation he's ignoring that existing titles be grandfathered made by the closer of a recent RFC here. – Calidum ¤ 22:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
===Post-closure comments ===
Post closure comment (for recycling in the next round of these pointless "give me my comma or give me death" RMs): The rationale above that if he were American "we could have reverted back to status quo" is false. MOS:JR has no special rule for Americans. WP:BRD is not a WP:RM rationale, ever.  RM  the D.  "Per MOS" is not a rationale in favor of such an RM, either, since MOS:JR and MOS:IDENTITY (based on WP:ABOUTSELF policy) are entirely against inserting a comma here. Finally, there are no "Arbcom decisions" that address this. Dohn joe seems to just be inserting random policy and procedure catchphrases, hoping one of them will stick somehow, as if by magic.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 March 2016 

message: Post closure comment (for recycling in the next round of these pointless "give me my comma or give me death" RMs): The rationale above that if he were American "we could have reverted back to status quo" is false. MOS:JR has no special rule for Americans. WP:BRD is not a WP:RM rationale, ever.  RM  the D.  "Per MOS" is not a rationale in favor of such an RM, either, since MOS:JR and MOS:IDENTITY (based on WP:ABOUTSELF policy) are entirely against inserting a comma here. Finally, there are no "Arbcom decisions" that address this. Dohn joe seems to just be inserting random policy and procedure catchphrases, hoping one of them will stick somehow, as if by magic.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:00, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-closure comments
Category talk:Shipwrecks

message: SOME ADDITIONAL ENTRIES, SEE Faedra for further possible enteries under this category.
C: Cap lopez Cap lopez: Shipwreck of Deal in Kent.
G: Guttenburg: Shipwreck of the Guttenburg, Ramsgate.
L:  Lucitania: RMS Lusitania. 
M: Mary White: Mary White.
:Feel free to put 'em in here! Everything on list of shipwrecks should be appropriate for this category. Stan 14:11, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: I don't agree that it should be empty - that just leads to artificially forcing pages into categories where they don't really fit, or inventing sub-catgeories just for one or two pages.  It's a laudable aim to ensure that individual wrecks are included in subcategories, and not here, but pages about the subject of shipwrecks in general (like wreck diving) need to be here. Viv Hamilton 23:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empty category template 

message: Does anyone know why San Demetrio is listed here? AFAIK she wasn't wrecked, and there's nothing about it on the article page. I thought the point of her story was that she wasn't lost, but brought home to port.Xyl 54 10:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: San Demetrio

message: While searching for SS Breda, I found it was (incorrectly) placed in :Category:World War II shipwrecks in the English Channel - fixed that.
Out of interest, I then looked at :Category:Shipwrecks in the English Channel - but I could not find that category in what I assumed to be its parent: :Category:Shipwrecks by body of water. Eventually I found that :Category:Shipwrecks in the English Channel is a subcategory of :Category:Shipwrecks in the Atlantic Ocean, a very dubious parent, since I doubt that anybody in the UK would look for the Channel as part of the Atlantic. Anyway, there are simply too many branches and subcategories to make finding a particular wreck anything but a tortuous task. Is there any good reason why all shipwrecks should not be in :Category:Shipwrecks as well as an appropriate sub-category? --RexxS (talk) 17:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub categories
Talk:Our Dumb Century

message: Too bad it's not for real. Reading the excerpts on The Onion web page, I thought it was for a while. I was very impressed, thinking this must have been one of the most radical and independent publications  of all time. I was quite surprised it was not widely recognized as such. But then it started to look too good to be true and I came here to check...
:Too bad what's not for real? The book? Because the book is sitting about three feet away from me right now, and if I'm operating on the assumption that the input of my senses constitutes reality, which is admittedly a big assumption, then I must come to the conclusion that the book is real. Either that or I'm hallucinating it, and have had false memories implanted of me reading it for some inexplicable reason. Or do you mean it's too bad that the events chronicled in the book aren't for real? Well, that would be... interesting, yes. 68.33.44.208 03:03, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think he actually thought that The Onion was actually printed from 1900 through 2000, which in and of itself is _incredibly_ funny!!!!! Family Guy Guy 01:42, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

message: So even though this talk page obviously isn't used much, I'm going to ask a question. The headlines in this article are written in all caps, which is obnoxious and incorrect, as far as I'm aware. Even though headlines are sometimes written in all caps in the newspaper itself, I think when they are reproduced they're supposed to be formatted standardly. So does anyone care is I change them to regular? --Natalie 00:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. Thanks. Go ahead. --Kizor 09:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are titles, though, so should probably have each word capitalized (but not all caps). --Storkk 09:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Which, of course, they are already. Don't mind me... --Storkk 09:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline formatting, etc. 

message: I noticed some of the Tetrahedron "news articles" while reading the book, but never really put them together until I saw this article mention it specifically. Looking through the book, I see it as the Amalgamated Tetrahedron Co. in 1917 (page 19), National Tetrahedron in 1932 (page 43), Global Tetrahedron Multinational Inc. in 1998 (page 163), and Global Tetrahedron Conglomerate in 2000 (page 164). I know I must be missing some, I don't see any mention of it in the first decade, and don't see anything between 1932 and 1998, surely it's mentioned at least once and I'm not noticing? Can anyone direct me to the rest of pages that mention it? 99.148.149.73 (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's one in the 1950s regarding an advertisement on the powers of Tritium. Kalmbach (talk) 07:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Tetrahedron
Talk:Vasyl Sukhomlynsky

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukhomlinsky - speedy keep. `'mikka (t) 00:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Afd

message: from Wikipedia:Help desk
Some time back I submitted an article to Wikipedia on V.A. Sukhomlinsky, using text from my own posted web pages at http://members.optusnet.com.au/~achcockerill/. To my knowledge I am the only English language writer to have published a study of Sukhomlinsky, and it is based on the thesis for which I was awarded my Ph.D.. My book has been well reviewed but not widely circulated (hence my web pages and my attempt to contribute to Wikipedia).
Someone has found that my article shares text with my web pages and has suspected a breach of copyright. I can assure you that both the text of the article and the text of the web pages are my own, and also that they are substantially different from the text of my book, (which is subject to copyright). The publishers of my book (which appeared in 1999) were very happy to see it promoted through my web site, and I am sure they would have no objection to my contributing an article to Wikipedia.
Yours sincerely,
Alan Cockerill e-mail: acockeri@bigpond.net.au
: I replied to Alan, suggesting he take this up on Wikipedia:Copyright problems - but it wasn't listed there (Alan's message above dates from a month after his original submission).  So things have plainly fallen between the cracks, and in the interests of m:Avoid Copyright Paranoia I've restored it.  I'll send Alan an email too. -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 11:02, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright confirmations

message: Some suggestions that would make the article more "wikipedia"-ish:
* we usually give someone's full name (not just their initials)
* it's good to know their place of birth and death, and other biographical details (family, education, cause of death)
* I'm entirely unfamiliar with the subject field, but I doubt the wikipedia as a whole is.  If the article isn't sensibly linked from other articles then it's essentially useless (no-one will ever find it).  So it's a good idea for someone who does know the domain to walk around in the wikipedia article space and add links here
* The ISBN of your book would be a useful addition (we'll add a "references" section, citing it and your website
--thanks Finlay McWalter |  Talk 11:24, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: No offence to the author, but this isn't an article, it's a fuzzy hagiography. I'm tempted to VFD it, frankly - there's no information here, just assertions that Sukhomlinsky was a wonderful human being who did wonderful things. When? Where? What has happened since? What happened before? - DavidWBrooks 17:34, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This isn't an article
Talk:Jaap Sahib

message: This was the external link that was previously included in the article:
English Translation of Jaap Sahib
But according to anonymous User:213.39.153.69's recent comments:
This is not the Jaap Sahib written by Giru Gobind Singh.
It is a website of a small religious group.
Can someone having more familiarity with the subject verify the truthfulness or falsity of this claim?  In either case, is the external link an appropriate one?  --Ardonik 11:30, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
that website is of a cult nothing to do with jaap sahib  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.6.135.176 (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: I am removing the following links; youtube should be linked on wikipedia - they do not provide copyright information:
* Jaap Sahib Full Prayer
* Jaap Sahib with Line By Line Translation
--RoadAhead =Discuss= 19:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube links 

message: I have just removed the following, thus emptying the External links section
* Read Jaap Sahib & Translation Online
* Download Punjabi Steek from Damdami Taksal
* Sikwiki page of Jaap sahib
* Jaap Sahib English Translation by Gobind Sadan PDF
* Read Jaap Sahib Online
* Jaap Sahib in Gurmukhi, English and its Transliteration by Sikh Research and Education Center
I really couldn't care less which link we supply but we do not need links to umpteen versions of similar material and this looks like spammed stuff. Please read WP:EL and gain consensus here for the inclusion of just one appropriate link. 
There is also no need for three audio links, so I've remove those, too, pending similar consensus.
* Audio from www.Sikhnet.com
* Daily Episodes of Jaap Sahib
* Recording Jaap Sahib
Now talk first, then edit please. - Sitush (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with External links
Talk:Overbetuwe

message: An anonymous user added this to the Elst redirect page:
Elst (Utrecht) of Elst(Gelderland)
What does it mean?  --Ardonik 11:39, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
: It means that Elst should be a disambiguation page. It is now. Eugene van der Pijll 21:18, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)