lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Newbury Park High School

message: The current revision of this article (22:01, 11 April 2007) reads like a personal reflection or essay and requires cleanup.  Consequently, it also lacks cited sources.  Per Wikipedia's quality standards, I am reverting some of the questionable portions to a more encyclopedic revision (03:08, 14 March 2007) and tagging the article for further cleanup. 67.124.200.18 04:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing Entry Is Not Encyclopedic 

message: They didn't really send everyone home after the tip about the 'device'.71.109.158.78 08:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bomb threat 

message: I know when I went to NPHS one of the girls from Little Rascals was a few years younger than me. Someone should look up because that's notable alumni.
Rforb001 (talk) 02:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Newport Harbor High School

message: There may be some vandalism because this school has been in the news ( http://www.ocregister.com/news/hirst-346201-okey-vossen.html ). --Guy Macon (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch this page... 

message: Add in history section: In 2019, students from the school engaged in underage drinking, during which they arranged red solo cups in the configuration of a Nazi swastika and Stars of David. Photos of them can be seen in many news outlets, smiling cheerfully as they raise their arms in the Nazi salute. As of yet, the students have gone unpunished, and will probably remain unpunished. Admitchirp (talk) 19:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Your request also has no supporting references, and it is not clear that this material would belong in this article even if it were properly sourced. Meters (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the OP also added the identical claim to another high school article. Meters (talk) 19:39, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are sources out there. It was not school event, and so far authorities don't even know which school or schools the teens were from, so this does not belong in a Wikipedia school article. Meters (talk) 19:44, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Meters. This does not belong here, or anywhere else on Wikipedia.  John from Idegon (talk) 22:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2019 

message: Remove, 
“Activities
Newport Harbor offers co-curricular activities for course credit, including: band/jazz band, cheer squad, choir, dance, drama, newspaper, surf team, yearbook and ASB.”
because these are regular extracurricular and are not needed for a page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GameOfAwesome (talk • contribs) 21:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove “Activtes
Talk:Nichols Canyon, Los Angeles

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Miracle Mile, Los Angeles, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: We need sources, or a lot of this will be challenged and removed. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote the article, using nothing but WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 16:40, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: :0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  where the HECK are We ?
Talk:Nikolai Rezanov

message: for some reason, the title of the page and the beginning of the article spell his name differently
fail/10  -Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.166.75 (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What a lot of bullshit this article is, quite unbelievable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.203.235.182 (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the title of "Count" from the text and illustration of the article. "Count" was an invention of American authors writing after Rezanov's death, and is not to be found in contemporary biographies and descriptions of Rezanov during and shortly after his life. Please check the Russian language wikipedia page on Rezanov for verification. The title "Count" is not to be found. His accurate titles were "Court Chamberlain and Cavalier, Ambassador Plenipotentiary "   Ltkizhi (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Count"
Talk:Nipton, California

message: What is the elevation??? 192.122.237.11 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation 

message: The article says that Nipton no longer sells the most California lottery tickets because you can buy them in Primm. But do they sell California lottery tickets in Nevada now? DavidMann (talk) 23:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lottery

message: Given that Nipton is the community where the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility is nearest to, shouldn't there be a brief section mentioning that? Some news articles state that it is in Nipton as it partly is, to my understanding. Redditaddict69  06:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: News media works off press releases mostly for things like this.  They are taking the address and making it the location, not uncommon in rural areas.  It should be covered in the county article, but it has an article of its own that can be linked and is linked here as part of the settlement's locating info.  I see no need for anything further.  Details on a facility near the community would be off-topic and would dilute the information on the community. John from Idegon (talk) 06:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivanpah Solar Power Facility 

message: Hi! Ok, so there is this back and forth about "Oliver Swanick" in the notable residents section.  Apparently, Swanick is a fictional character in a video game that is mentioned in the popular culture section.  Swanick is not notable enough to merit their own page.  There is probably policy somewhere, but the closest I'm seeing is MOS:SEEALSO which says that the see also section should not have red links.  I also question whether a fictional character should be under notable residents as they never physically resided.  Perhaps a compromise would be to add something about Swanick to the popular culture section if and only if it is supported by a WP:RS.  What do other editors think?  14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oliver Swanick
Talk:NoHo Arts District, Los Angeles

message: Isn't this part of NH? It doesn't provide any separate information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.180.170 (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't this be merged?

message: NoHo Arts District is a distinct area within North Hollywood; similar to Toluca Lake and Valley Village. There is some outdated information here though. Plus, the new Snyder office building's number of floors needs to be corrected.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespeace (talk • contribs) 05:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not merge

message: I am appalled at some of the comments that was in this article, referring to North Hollywood as a "lower class" neighborhood. I also didn't see the need to try and associate the arts district with Valley village, mentioning that it was located near it. Valley village is no longer apart of North Hollywood and hasn't been for years. They decided to decisively break away to "rid themselves" from the rest of the community. NoHo wish not to be associated with Valley Village and lets keep it that way for we do not share the same interest. From public transit (which we almost didn't have the bus way because of them and also thanks to them, we have a bus way instead of a light rail), to condos,to building heights, to diversity, to billboards, to affordable housing; we do not see eye to eye. Now that North Hollywood is on a fast rebound, doesn't give them the right to be associated with the community when people in NoHo worked so hard to improve it, working our hearts out for something we believed in. When you make your bed, you should lay in it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BCF1:89B0:F0F4:57FD:A6FF:3ADD (talk) 08:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Polarizing comments
Talk:Noleta

message: Could references please be added. Chubbennaitor 12:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it could use some.  If anyone is willing to help here is a good place to start (if you have News-Press access, that would work too -- but you need a subscription for their site, newspress.com).  The Independent probably has more readers than any other local publication.  Since Noleta is a densely-populated unincorporated area, it's hard to cover in any other article, which is why this article exists; all the other unincorporated areas in the region have associated place names of long usage (Hope Ranch, Isla Vista, Mission Canyon, Montecito, ....) Antandrus  (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  references
Talk:Chōhei Kambayashi

message: I think the name of the page should be Chōhei Kambayashi (m instead of n).  It has been always spelled so in the copyright notices of Japanese books, and it is used in the forthcoming Yukikaze English translation, as far as I can tell from googling.
* WP:MOS-JP says "While generally deprecated, this is still allowed in titles for cases where the official romanization continues to use m."
* WP:MOS says "Generally, article naming should prefer what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize."
--Fukumoto (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move done.  --Fukumoto (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Norco, California

message: I don't think that the section on Norco High School in Massachusetts belongs here.  It wouldn't be worthy of a full article to itself, so I understand why it would be added here, but given that the title of this article is specifically "Norco, California" it simply does not belong. I will be removing it and merely keeping this in case of discussion. -- Masterzora 22:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ironically, the Norco Bank Shootout is included, because it took place in Norco, California not the Norco in Massachusetts. But don't worry, Norco is well known for their high number of equastrians in the "horse community". As the man guarding the door of the Wizard's castle said on The Wizard of Oz : "Well, that's a horse of another color". 71.102.21.238 (talk) 11:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norco High School 
Talk:Common coquí

message: This page should be moved to ELEUTHERODACTYLUS COQUI, and have "common coqui" (or whatever other common names you wish) to be redirected to that page.
64.75.193.32 00:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This page should be moved

message: The article currently says "The Common Coquí is a general nocturnal predator which can consume 114,000 invertebrates each night.".  I believe this must refer to 20,000 individuals/ha as that fact comes from the same printed source.  The article text makes it seem like a single frog can eat 114,000 bugs every night. --Boston (talk) 22:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 114,000 invertebrates ORLY?

message: The introduction makes reference to the coquí's cultural importance. Perhaps there should be a section in the article addressing this topic? Caballero//Historiador ☊  16:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Puerto Rican culture

message: The current sample contains a very persistant buzzing cicada in addition to the frogs. --2601:445:8300:3370:E190:94D4:E07D:994D (talk) 08:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better sound file needed 

message: Hey, I just wanted to say sorry for messing up four edits in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Common_coqu%C3%AD&diff=1179518121&oldid=1149691230
What was supposed to be a small change (from "endemic" to "native") ended up taking 4 edits because I kept screwing up. First I forgot to login, then I accidentally pasted the whole article again into the top section, doubling its size. I think it's fixed now, but sorry about that!
-Arcataroger (talk) 17:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologies for some editing mistakes 

message: Added information on several recent studies which expanded a lot of the page's content on the invasive populations of Hawaii. Other additions include drivers of morphology and impacts on its native ecology. Conclusions drawn from studies on reproductive and diet behavior were likewise added. A few more images were added along with some formatting and grammatical edits. JackRuvin0 (talk) 00:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of 7 sources, edits
Talk:Normal Heights, San Diego

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Allied Gardens, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: This article lacks any information about crime in the neighborhood:
*KFB-TV, 2007
*San Diego Reader, 2017
--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime
Talk:North Bay Aqueduct

message: This page looks like a good start! I do see that there is only one source cited so maybe it would be good to find additional sources and add more in text citations. I see more sources on your bIbliography page but not yet in your published page. The content is a good overview of the aquaduct and maybe you can break some of the content up into multiple sections for the reader to find information more easily. For example, I'd like to see the capacity and storage issues under its own sections and maybe even the tributaries listed under a separate section too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maryampersand (talk • contribs) 20:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENVS 135
Talk:Minor Planet Center

message: "In the movie Deep Impact, the actual scientific group to which the amateur would report the finding of a new asteroid would be the MPC. This is one of the major scientific facts completely ignored by this film."
I removed this notion about a movie. It did not make sense without detailed knowledge of the movie. Second it seems that MPC actually did not appear in the movie so why mention it here? Will we list all the movies where MPC did not appear? Third, this criticism of the movie was not sourced ("This is one of the major scientific facts completely ignored by this film." -- says who?(is this really a scientific fact?)). --Jan Smolik 19:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In pop culture
Talk:North County Times

message: http://m.nctimes.com/
WhisperToMe (talk) 00:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive
Category talk:Labor

message: Suggestion: Tie this to human resources management somehow.  (I'm still not fluent in Wikipedia terminology so I may be talking about merging or something else.)  In the US especially, the term human resources is much more widespread in popular society. Sonria 19:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Human resources" is "much more widespread", if at all, only among certain management groups. It is not by any means more widespread than "labor" among legal professions, workers, or many other categories. Please see, for example, Labor law. --Lquilter (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: This category is huge! And very redundant of :Category:Labour relations.  I've been making some basic subcategories to try to diffuse it a little, and to get the articles here into other relevant category trees as well. --Lquilter (talk) 23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cleaning up

message: I remove labor capitalism and marxian economic cats.
Because the labor isn't a business and because labor is not necessarily linked to capitalism and to marxian economics. If you want, you can give your opinion. Zipodu (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  category section
Talk:North Fair Oaks, California

message: There is a large Latina population in the general area including Redwood City that gets referred to as Little Mexico.  It is worth noting that the specific area around North Fair Oaks which is along Middlefield and Fair Oaks Avenues has a particularly large representation of immigrants from Michoacan, Mexico.  This is consistent with immigration often involving many people from nearby areas often travelling or networking together and making use of family ties when possible.  I am looking for good references for this, but for now I think there should be a really good reason for removing it because it is notable that this one coastal state has such an influence on this little town.  This is exhibited in a whole range of ways such as seafood and fish tacos being very common because most have always lived by the Pacific coast, to gang problems being greatly reduced in this particular community.  Made this comment a while ago, but forgot to sign it: --- M0llusk (talk) 03:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Michoacan versus Little Mexico
Talk:Bustopher Jones

message: so cute  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.218.120 (talk) 03:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Evidence of notability in HighBeam search. Many other characters from Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats and Cats have their own articles. That is not direct evidence for notability here but if we're going to delete one of these, the others should also be considered for deletion. There's also an open merge proposal for this article. All of this makes this a less than uncontroversial deletion so not appropriate for WP:PROD. ~Kvng (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DEPROD]]
Talk:North Highlands, California

message: Having grown up in North Highlands, CA, I thought I would see what Wikipedia had to say about it.  There is a reference to one of its notable residents; one Anthony J. Pidcock II (1977 - Present).  I've never heard of Anthony and wanting to know more about a famous former resident and Highlands High School alumnus, I immediately searched on his name.  I found nothing.  He even shows up in the Sacramento write up as a "Famous Resident."  Others on the list have hyperlinks on their names, but his does not.  I suspect he may have edited the article to bogusly insert himself. I personally know of people from North Highlands who have gone on to do some really great things, but I've never heard of Anthony.
I also noted that the list of Sacramento famous residents has people listed that I would question.  One is an NBA player who was only there for a few years.  The others seem to be politicians.  Well, since Sacramento is the Capitol of California, there are a lot of politicians who have lived there, and many are more famous than the ones listed.  I didn't see Leo J. Ryan, the US Congressman killed in the infamous 1978 Jonestown, Guyana massacre by Jim 'don't drink the Kool-Aid" Jones.  One of my sisters told me he was her Political Science instructor at American River College before he died.  There were many celebrities who lived in Sacramento while I was growing up, yet the only people listed are all still living.  There were also local home-grown athletes who went on to fame in their sports; what about them?
I suggest you contact the Sacramento Chamber of Commerce or some other community organization and have them vet these articles.LABoomer54 (talk) 21:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I too was raised in North Highlands, my family moved there around 1958 and my mom and brother still live there.  I've never heard of Mr. Pidcock either.  A web search comes up with nothing.  I was looking for a wiki template to mark that spot as questionable, for example, , but that one didn't work well, and I couldn't find another.  I thought about erasing him, but that seemed a bit bold. Donpayette (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question About Sacramento/North Highlands Reference
Talk:Mobile Suit Z Gundam: Hot Scramble

message: This is probably one of my all time favorite NES games (and one of the best gundam games ever made, in my opinion), so I added as much detail as I could to it.  I would love some sourced material to be added, but the only source I know of is at rpgclassics as a subsection of Away to the Newtype. 209.248.160.82 21:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Best Gundam Game
Talk:North County (San Diego area)

message: "and older phones may still be assigned to 619." -- is this even possible? Why would certain "older" phone numbers not have been changed to 760? It's not an overlay, where previously established phone numbers kept their old area code. All phone numbers would have become 760. -70.181.204.223 20:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Area code 619

message: I'm opposed. -Branddobbe (talk) 07:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article contains only the information that can be moved into San Diego County, California article. --Mgillfr (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's grounds for expansion, not merging. North County is distinct enough to warrant its own article. -Branddobbe (talk) 03:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It fits perfectly in the History section, where it talks a brief statement of North County. Though the south part of the county in the other article could use an expansion. --Mgillfr (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Why is this page title "San Diego North County, California?" This is not what it is called. It is just North County, which redirects to this page. If there ever arises an ambiguity with another North County, then should it not be called "North County (California region)" or something per the usual method of clarifying titles? Soltras (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Never having changed an article's title before, can anyone tell me if you just do it, or is there a process for making sure that everything that currently links to this article will still do so after the name change?Dohn joe (talk) 23:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The new title works, except for the comma. No one ever uses a comma there. Ever. -Branddobbe (talk) 21:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with Branddobbe, I think. The title reads as if North County is a district or neighborhood of the City of San Diego. I don't know all stylistic norms, but I would think "North County (San Diego)" might be more appropriate. What would an editor think? YellowAries2010 (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Too right you are. Page moved to North County (San Diego area), though I really think this should just be renamed North County as that page already redirects here. --SchutteGod (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title