lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Discover (magazine)

message: The fact that this entity is owned by the Walt Disney Company is mentioned in the article and in the article's categorization.  Therefore, the see also section is unnecessary. --Gentgeen 05:52, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy 

message: In looking at my May 2009 issue (see Page 80), I see that the magazine will now publish combined issues in January/February and July/August.  This is a recent change and I am trying to verify when it happened.  The March 2009 issue still states that it is a monthly magazine.  I no longer have the April 2009 edition, can someone check to see if this change was made in April 2009 or did it first occur in May 2009?  The information should be at the back of the magazine on the last few pages.  I am hesitant to update the article without knowing when the changed actually happened.  Thanks, Stangbat (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was able to verify that this change was announced in the April 2009 issue (Page 80).  I have been unable to find any mention of this change in any online news article nor on Discover's web site.  The only mention I have found of a double issues is when you subscribe online, there is small text on the bottom of the subscription page that states, "Discover publishes two double issues which count as two issues each." Stangbat (talk) 00:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combined Issues (Jan/Feb, Jul/Aug) 

message: The article states "two investment companies" bought Discover. WHICH ONES?
Mydogtrouble (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHO owns it? 

message: Kalmbach publishing buys Discover magazine  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiteboy02 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  new owners 

message: "Gilbert Rogin was brought in 1985 to revive Discovery. In 1986, Time purchased the shuttered magazines', Science Digest and Science 86, subscription lists from their publishers for Discovery. […] In January 1987, Time appointed a new Discovery Magazine publisher […] From January to July 1991, Discovery magazine lost 15% of its advertising"<br
/>— What's "Discovery"? --Jerome Potts (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Discovery" 

message: I revealed that a human mind is like a phone, we can return to it the information that has been deleted.  Through a smart chip implanted in the mind, all the information that was deleted from his blood must be in it From a brain through pictures and everything he lost and how he lost it This is the fastest way to recover memory and it is artificial intelligence. 41.227.148.38 (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to present a topic in the field of brain medicine
Talk:Jane (magazine)

message: The fact that this entity is owned by the Walt Disney Company is mentioned in the article and in the article's catigorization.  Therefore, the see also section is unnecessary. Gentgeen 05:55, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I don't know anything about this subject so I can't help much.  I tried to clean some of it (actually, really just the last sentence) and added a reference, but I'm not sure if its a reputable one or not (actually, I'm fairly sure it's not).  If someone who knew more about this could try to clean it up and find proper sources (which are really needed here!) that would be great. Crito2161 00:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I've seen the episode; is there a source to confirm that the episode was designed to make fun of Jane magazine? The episode shows characters criticizing Val for just covering things like lipstick fashions and cute teen boy celebrities, things I don't associate with Jane. --Halloween jack 03:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Daria

message: Anyone looking to get their money back from subscription purposes can call Glamour at 18002747410Ouddy79 22:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subscription Refund 

message: This is a terrible magazine.--76.244.160.95 (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jane
Talk:28978 Ixion

message: I was searching for Ixion's right ascension in longitude (ie: its position at a determined Epoch measured from the Zero Aries fiducial). This does not seem to be in Ixion's infobox. Can we get this? It is one of the customary orbital arguments. 70.27.169.176 (talk) 13:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This parameter is not necessary if the rest of Solar System object articles don't use it. See Template:Infobox planet. Nrco0e  17:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

text: Ixion will be in the constellation of Sagittarius (constellation) from Oct 2019 to July 2021. -- Kheider (talk) 18:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right Ascension
Talk:Pedro II of Brazil

message: I'm contesting this edit, which changes the infobox portrait from  to , for a few different reasons. I think contextually the Brady is more appropriate for here. The Nadar was taken in 1991 at the end of Pedro's life, a few years after his ousting. His health deteriorated significantly at the end of his reign and into his exile, which is why he looks weakened, almost anemic, in the Nadar portrait. Conversely, the Brady was taken in 1876, a more central point in his life which happened to also be the apex of his reign, and as such is more broadly representative of him. I also note that the Nadar is already at Exile and death of Pedro II of Brazil. Curbon7 (talk) 11:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair, I suppose, but I don't particularly like the Brady portrait. A little awkwardly posed Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.7% of all FPs. 22:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also reasonable for the picture for figures of this era to be a painting, such as with Napoleon III, so that is also an option. Curbon7 (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's a lot of nice images on the Google Art Project, including a couple that might well be better than what we have - there's some very nice paintings of his younger days, and a good photo or two. Anything you like? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.7% of all FPs. 08:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , sorry for the long delay, I have been seriously unwell which has significantly impacted my editing capacity. I trust your judgment with photography/images, so I'll leave it to the one you think is best. Curbon7 (talk) 06:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brady/Nadar portrait 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Pedro Américo - D. Pedro II na abertura da Assembléia Geral.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 2, 2025. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2025-12-02. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. 200th anniversary of birth If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! ―Howard • 🌽33 01:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Eddie

message: Reversion of apparent vandalism by anon user 68.90.43.242:
Unless you're prepared to back this up with a reference, or at the very least an article, I am presuming that this is vandalism and removing it. Kevyn 06:41, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: what's the name of that WWI American pilot who shot down the most enemy planes? I'm pretty sure that was an Eddie.
Eddie Rickenbacker. I've added him. --Ye Olde Luke 20:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's the WWI Pilot?
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago

message: When did John Paul II elevate the see of Chicago to honorary primatial status?  I thought that dignity still belonged to the Archbishop of Baltimore.  Can anybody give me some info or a source? Pmadrid 07:52, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: More population info:
* Chicago has 2.44 million Catholics now.
* New York archdiocese has 2.47 million Catholics.  In 2001, it had only 2.37 million compared to Chicago's 2.38, so it only inched out Chicago recently.
* Los Angeles archdiocese, though, has 4 million Catholics.  It is the largest in the United States.
Pmadrid 16:35, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Sees in the United States 

message: So I took this off the page:
:It has been deemed by the Holy See as the Preeminent See of the United States due to the international fame and popularity of its archbishops...
I have yet to find any text from the Roman Curia or a pope calling Chicago "the preeminent see."  If someone has a quote from a pope or a dicastery, please provide it. Pmadrid 14:14, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preeminent see 

message: I would like to invite the editors of this page to come see Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami which achieved Featured Article status on Dec. 8 2007.  It may help you organize this page in a way that helps it be more concise and representative of what the Archdiocese is. Good luck! NancyHeise (talk) 02:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  good example to follow 

message: According to http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/dchic.html, the name of the archdiocese in Latin is Archidioecesis Chicagiensis and not Archidioecesis Chicagoensis. Which is right? 128.111.130.97 (talk) 23:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "multiple" :
** 
** 
DumZiBoT (talk) 18:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: * Mendieta, Ana. "Future looks bright for Catholic schools Archdiocese fair attracts dozens of potential teachers." Chicago Sun-Times. March 26, 2000. Page 6.
WhisperToMe (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: More sources
Talk:Christopher J. Date

message: Is the notability tag a joke? C.J. Date is mentioned in about every relational database article in Wikipedia. The article itself states one book sold 700,000 copies of "Introduction to Database Systems". From the notability guidelines: "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors". 
Pukkie 13:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's a request for citations to independent secondary sources that establish notability.  Mention in wikipedia articles is not useful in this respect.  Please see WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NOTE.  Reference some books that cite him; his own book will not do either. Dicklyon 15:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Bob Badour 23:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All you added was an ext. link to citeseer to show that his book is widely referenced.  That's not the same as citations of articles about him.  It's a component of notability, but certainly you can do better.  Dicklyon 23:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a tag for references - fine, maybe some need adding. Notability on the hand! Do me a favour! This guy is world renowned with or without references. Placing a notability tag on this article is laughable; I've removed it. 86.27.54.199 19:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: OK, I found some sources for you guys who want to demonstrate notability: here are some books.  The key was to search for "Chris Date" instead of full name.  Anyway, if you add some refs about him, then you can take out the tags that are calling for them. Dicklyon 03:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for granting permission! 86.0.86.79 10:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your welcome, but I was only trying to help; thanks for adding one ref already. Dicklyon 16:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dicklyon, I've reverted your last edit in the article because it seems that according to Wikipedia notability guidelines for academics, criterion 3, we probably now have an adequate reference to ensure notability. I accept it's only one reference, but I suggest that's enough. However, if you think otherwise, add the tag again and I'll try and find some more. 82.28.2.210 20:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, multiple means more than one, but since you've volunteered to work on it, I won't bother with the tag again.  Thanks. Dicklyon 22:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I don't know what criterion is employed in the choice of books to mention but "Database in Depth: Relational Theory for Practitioners, " should most likely be deleted if "SQL and Relational Theory, 2nd Edition: How to Write Accurate SQL Code, " is present, as this replace the former.
78.14.34.91 (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: List of works
Talk:The Global Trap

message: Good idea, your direction. But it seems to me that the article still don't explain if the book, which I didn't hear about before (I don't live in an English-speaking country), is a sci-fi novel or a research work. 
If it is the later case, the article doesn't show what the book presents as the probable causes of the predicted trap, and the relation between those causes and globalization. 
You know, I'm always surprised that many meople demonize globalization as the scapegoat and source of all evils, while for me it is a step towards mankind unity and democracy (I did the democratic globalization article), away from nation-states dominance which was the main source of massacres, selfishness and divisions in history. 
Thanks. --Pgreenfinch 08:20, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bogside Artists

message: Er this is an article in urgent need of some NPOV Sjc 09:01, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some time ago I added an image of a mural that is not here. See [].
--Óli Gneisti (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added it to the gallery.  You'll need to supply the caption. --Wilson44691 (talk) 01:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  One more mural 
Talk:Inert gas

message: According to the article Neon, neon has a compound. Andres 09:01, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: A list of some non-elemental inert gases would be nice. I imagine CO2 and N2 would be top candidates, but are there more? --Roentgenium111 (talk) 22:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: CO2 is not inert. It can inhibit oxidation but reacts with moisture to form carbonic acid, which induces hypercapnia in animals. 60.231.232.99 (talk) 06:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List? 

message: is not mentioned as a production method.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.86.155.166 (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ammonia cracking 

message: If you come to this article for information you quickly come to this paragraph, which is unclear (to me) to say the least:
Unlike noble gases, an inert gas is not necessarily elemental and is often a compound gas. Like the noble gases the tendency for non-reactivity is due to the valence, the outermost electron shell, being complete in all the inert gases. This is a tendency, not a rule, as noble gases and other "inert" gases can react to form compounds.
I don't think this is to do with the subject being complicated, more a result of foggy writing. I don't know enough about the matter to rewrite it myself; but "Unlike noble gases, an inert gas ... " jars with me, as some noble gases can be inert. What is the significance of inert being in quote marks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.73.150 (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Opaque

message: Somebody with a potty mouth has added garbage to the first paragraph.  I'm no expert editor so I am asking someone who knows how to track hidden inserts into the text (which this seems to be - I don't see the potty text when trying to edit) to fix this little problem.  Many regards, 67.222.229.171 (talk) 02:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Inert gases 2409:4042:4D49:9BE:C01A:2E60:654F:1643 (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inert gases 

message: Nitrogen is not inert. http://www.uigi.com/nitrogen.html --Kitchen Knife (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nitrogen
Talk:Pine Grove, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania

message: Because of the existence of multiple Pine Grove, Pennsylvanias, this article has been moved from Pine Grove, Pennsylvania to Pine Grove, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania.
Pine Grove, Pennsylvania is now a disambig page.
Kevyn 09:03, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Pine Grove, Pennsylvanias
Talk:King Leir

message: Is this really "Cordella"?  If so, let's make it "Cordella [sic]".  --Chinasaur
The Early English Books Online (EEBO) database attributes this play to Michael Drayton (1563-1631). Caliginous (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello; the link directing to the comparison of both, Leir and Lear seems to be dead end? Could someone check out? Thx!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.250 (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is she killed off like in Shakespeare's?  Or does it imply she will become Queen following the account of Geophry of Monmouth?--JaredMithrandir (talk) 05:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happens to Cordelia in this? 

message: These sources are unnamed and cannot be found. Logan and Smith does not refer to On Reading Shakespeare by Logan Pearsall Smith, because that is only 177 pages in length.
:
Shakeeespeare (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logan and Smith
Talk:Pine Grove, West Virginia

message: Because of the existence of multiple Pine Grove, West Virginias, this page has been moved from Pine Grove, West Virginia to Pine Grove, Wetzel County, West Virginia.
Pine Grove, West Virginia is now a disambiguation page.
Kevyn 09:18, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Pine Grove, West Virginias

message: — Assignment last updated by Tracefreed42 (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Urban Geography
Talk:Darrell Russell (dragster driver)

message: A sentence in this article reads:
:"He was interred in the Klein Cemetery in Pinehurst, Texas."
Pinehurst, Texas is a disambig page,
Any idea which of the following Texas towns is the correct one?
*Pinehurst, Montgomery County, Texas
*Pinehurst, Orange County, Texas
Kevyn 10:09, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Pinehurst, Texas?
Category talk:Wing Commander (franchise)

message: I did some categorization fixup here. The ultimate goal is, that everything fictional will end up in subcategories of :Category:Fictional, but not real life entities, like books, movies, authors and actors. See :Category_talk:Fictional. Pjacobi 10:40, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional

message: Could someone please explain the mulit-player mode in Wing Commander: Armada? How did this work? Were the two players at the same computer? If not, how did they polay together? Was it via the internet? At that time, the internet was just starting to take root. so I wanted to clarify this. Thanks. --Sm8900 15:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question re Game structure

message: !Question-What is the name of the Wing Commander TV Spin Off?!
I have been looking for the spin off, and can't remember the title of the series. It did not last long, but FOX aired it soon after Wing Commander came out to video. iMDb does not have info either. Anyone know the title?131.58.64.193 (talk) 10:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WING Commander Spin off TV Series
File talk:Cold fusion electrolysis.PNG

message: It's Dewar, not Dewer, Theresa, but this time I'll let you edit the drawing. :-) -- Heron 12:41, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind.  I had some spare time and fixed it for you.  Hope you don't mind my tinkering. -- Heron 10:44, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Kharkiv

message: Hiya,
You might want to remove Moscow as a sister city 😅. 31.161.144.192 (talk) 22:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see Moscow listed as a sister city. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ymblanter It was listed on infobox, but I'm not sure whether should be removed or not. Lemonaka (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see thanks. Yes, I removed four Russian cities from the list, it is clear they are not sister cities anymore. Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Lemonaka (talk) 13:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 December 2022 

message: Fixing typos 2600:1700:2432:E000:F99A:4A7A:1EE7:F7B5 (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 22:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 March 2023
Talk:Worzel Gummidge

message: My whole family loves Worzel (the TV series) very much. The stories are simple and the character's are fun. The "head thing" has been explained to and understood by all of our children and has actually helped them understand many of life's other real and unreal conundrums too.
Compare this with what our elite and hubristic society accepts as normal for our children to watch today. Worzel wins heads & hands down.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.154.203 (talk) 09:25, August 25, 2007 (UTC) 
now i remember this tv series scared me to death as child :)
:Me too - just looking at the pictures of him on this page gives me the creeps! I think it was the interchangable heads that did it...
:: I'll third that. He's just so bloody creepy looking. Don't like it pomegranate 18:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Losing your head

message: Was his head a turnip or a Mangelwurzel? Jooler 09:35, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Head

message: The last paragraph of this section seems quite disjointed. Reads like its been copy and pasted from somewhere. pomegranate 18:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Story line section

message: The year given, 1947, might be for the first television show soon after TV returned from its wartime closure. Worzel Gummidge ran on radio Children's Hour during the war, probably before it too.--SilasW 20:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting date

message: According to IMDb there was a 1953 TV series called Worzel Gummidge Turns Detective. Does anyone have information on this?--The Shadow Treasurer (talk) 05:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worzel Gummidge Turns Detective 

message: This page doesn't quite seem to know whether it's subject is the 1970–80s TV series starring Jon Pertwee, or Worzel Gummidge the character as featured in the series. The vast majority of the data relates to the TV series, but there is some info on the earlier books, radio series, TV series, Jackanory, etc. 
I think the existing page needs to become 'Worzel Gummidge (TV series)' with 'Worzel Gummidge' continuing to exist for the other/earlier incarnations of the character. Any thoughts? I'll leave things as they are for the time being, but unless anyone can put up a good case for not doing so, I intend to proceed with 'the split' after a suitable period. Thanks.  86.2.48.247 (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity crisis?