Talk:Gevalia

message: I recently purchased 12 ounce bags of Gevalia whole bean and ground coffee from a Safeway on the Peninsula in the San Francisco Bay Area on about 4/2/2012. It appears that Gevalia has extended their sales and marketing to a large grocery chain. I don't know anything further about this but it appears that the main article is not up to date on US sales and marketing. Figlinus (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Anyway, started in 1920, but sold 120 years later (in 1971)?  That line needs some clarification. Alcuin 18:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Then entry mentions that Gevalia is a mainstream supermarket brand in Europe.  Would it be the equivalent of Folger's marketing itself as an ultra-premium brand overseas? --24.249.108.133 00:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA Equivalent 

message: How does one pronounce "Gevalia?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.227.127.12 (talk • contribs) 
I'm not sure about the Swedish pron., but in Danish we pronounce both A's like the A in Apple. 2nd syllable stressed (ge-VA-li-a). I assume the stressed syllable VA in Swedish is more like VO in VOlume and the last A like A in After.
The G has the G-sound as in Go, not the DJ-sound as in George
Eventually try ask on the swedish talk page?
:G®iffen 13:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Plausible... G®iffen 22:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Yeah I got another one of their spam messages today too (23.June.2008)... I decided to fix the link to the image embedded in the email that was previously posted (HTML was visible on the page).Dreammaker182 (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  image example edit 

message: I added a reference to the lawsuit...Dreammaker182 (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference added 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tag these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Referencing the above comments from 2008 about Gevalia starting to spam again -- from the perspective of someone who owns several domains and has for many years -- there has never been an extended period of time when I was NOT receiving spam about Gevalia. I got a few today. seedclose.info was the domain for the page that redirected to Gevalia. Anyway, we're not here to hunt down spammers. I wonder what it would take to document the extent of Gevalia spam sufficiently to warrant tarring the company (further) here for bad behavior. Personally, I find them sufficiently irritating that I think regularly about writing/blogging about them (though of course never take the time to do so.) I mention it here for anecdotal/informational purposes -- it is now 2011, and Gevalia spam remains common. Whether it is third party/affiliate marketing, the company itself, whatever ... I don't know.
AuthJeff (talk) 23:29, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gevalia Spam ... 2011 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gevalia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120210224144/http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12107.html to http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12107.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently says: "Gevalia holds the royal warrant for coffee roasters from H.M. the King of Sweden". This would mean that there is only one company that can hold a royal warrant for coffee roasters in Sweden at any time. Does anyone have a source for that claim? If no one comes up with a source, I will (if I remember it; others are of course welcome to do it) change the sentence to "Gevalia holds a royal warrant from H.M. the King of Sweden". --Jhertel (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The royal warrant for coffee roasters"? 

message: The intro says that the company discontinued its teas, but the article continues to talk about teas in the present tense. Does the article just need a copy edit? Or did the company resume selling tea? Or is the intro just wrong? --Khajidha (talk) 17:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teas