lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:British Rail DMU

message: I have created a new design for the template. It can be found below. The benifits of it over the current design are that it is collapsible, it has the v-d-e function, the layout is clearer and the template takes up less space on the page. 
I would like to hear the thoughts of other people first, and have a consensus reached on whether it should be implemented. If you wish to make any changes to the design, then please make a copy of the template below, then modify it. This means the templates can be compared against each other. 
I have also made similar proposals on the related templates here and here. 
--Jorvik 20:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much cleaner and less "tall" than the original. I had been thinking about proposing a change myself and this is exactly the kind of thing I had in mind. The same goes for the proposals at Template talk:British Rail Locomotives and Template talk:British Rail EMU, although I would suggest different colours for each template (not sure which ones though). -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 20:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redesign proposal 

message: Do we really need to keep the second section (in this grab)? The information about the original TOPS numbers are already in the articles themselves, 
and it would require extra work to do what I was considering doing before I came across this section: marking withdrawn classes in italics. Anywho: thoughts anyone? Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second section: the first gens (original TOPS) 

message: I've just come across this template by accident with no real train knowledge, so I don't understand why the link for 140 in First Generation Original TOPS takes you to the British Rail Class 104 page. There's nothing to enlighten the uninformed visitor as to whether this "140" redirect is correct or simply an oversight. It would be nice if someone could elaborate. Mighty Antar (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 140 & 104

message: I was just wondering if there would be any merit in splitting a "post-privatisation" section from the 2nd generation section (and similar on the other templates). Post-privatisation stock really is quite different in many respects, and I think such a split would be useful. Does anyone agree? --Muzer (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split up BR and post-privatisation?
Talk:Yamaha Phazer

message: I've noticed that Wikipedia doesn't have a great section on snowmobiles;  the main snowmobile page is a good introduction, but the details are lacking.  However, I'm not an expert in this area;  I just added this page because I wanted to create an article (it's really my first new article), and because I used to ride them with my family years ago.  I pieced together the history of the Phazer from the Yamaha website;  the years I gave for the ending of the product lines come from the parts catalogue found on the site http://parts.yamaha-motor.com, by checking which year the name disappears from the line-up.  Not brilliant detective work, but I'd love if anyone can help flesh this out beyond my limited knowledge. Khamsin 21:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Property law

message: Citations are good however you run the risk of confining yourself to one jurisprudential region. Better to leave them out!!!
*I think they help. It's tricky with all our differing jurisdictions but it's nice to have authorities for some of the statements of law made from other countries. Having seperate subheading for different jurisdictions can be messy, but helpful sometimes. Can we leave them out?? I think for statments giving example like the quasi-property rights around dead bodies in the USA should have an cited authority. However it may not be necessary to add the Australian position, for example, unless in can be contrasted with the US position. Is there a wiki guru here who can direct Talk Page readers to the policy relating to the level of detail an entry should aim to?
Thanks
--Arlington456 (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Citations? 

message: This article is a strange mixture of contintental, american and english law. I think the Napoleonic code stuff should be a footnote its not very relevant in the Anglophone world. Though it may have had an impact on US state law (The US constitution was passed before the French Revolution). SOmeone call a lawyer.Mrdthree 12:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article focuses far too much on the contemporary state of the common law, and specifically U.S. law.  An article entitled "Property Law" should be about property law generally.  I agree that Property Law in the United States might be a good thing to separate out.  Common-Law Property Law might also be a good page to separate.  I actually think this article merits a worldwide view notice, and will add one.  Elliotreed 04:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is there a Lawyer in the house?

message: The transfer of property section ought to mention adverse possession as a way to acquire title.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.186.32 (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverse possession 

message: This article has an undue focus on European legal systems in general and concepts from the common law tradition (especially the USA) in particular.  Much of the article is written in general terms without specific reference to the common law/USA but the discussion is clearly based on that legal tradition.  Accordingly, I've added the worldwide view template and added this to the wikiproject on countering systemic bias. Elliotreed (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide view 

message: I've removed a few sections on here from people who are seeking legal advice. This is definitely not the place for that. This talk page is for discussing the article and possible changes that can be made, and is not where you should be looking for legal advice. In fact, it is highly encouraged that you don't seek legal advice here, because god only knows who could be giving it to you. Pascal (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki ≠ Legal advisers
Talk:AFGNCAAP

message: I just noticed that somebody changed the paragraph about "second-person" games into one about "first-person." I don't think that the new version is right at all. While it's true that most graphical games or this sort use the first-person perspective, it's also true that the old Zork games were literally written in the second person ("you are standing in a field...") and not the first person... The first person was sometimes used by the text parser itself ("I don't know the word "help") but that's not really what we're talking about here. 
Not to mention, "first person games" is always used to describe games which visually use the first-person perspective, despite having plots that use, in this context, the "third person." You know what I'm saying? "2nd Person" is appropriate for games like Zork.
Anybody have a source to cite for this? Luigihann 00:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First or Second person?

message: I know it was a funny little bit of adventure game satire, but considering that it was a one line joke in Zork: Grand Inquisitor, and never mentioned again, do we really need an entire article dedicated to it? TV4Fun (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology#Article AFGNCAAP for a suggestion to psychologist-editors that they address the concept underlying this early video-gaming meme from a historical perspective. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic referred to psychologists
Talk:Thottbot

message: If anyone wants to contribute a bit, please do. I figured this should be here so I made it an article.KanjiNinja 21:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, if it's notable, let's find some reliable sources to prove it, people. "Thottbot is notable because WP:ILIKEIT" isn't going to cut it if someone sends this to AfD. (To be honest, I think thottbot/alla/wowace/etc should probably be on a list somewhere, or merged to a WoW Addons article, or something, but that's just my POV. spazure (contribs) (review) 09:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Further, yes, I looked for sources on my own via google, I found nothing but wowwiki references and a bunch of forum posts, but nothing that meets WP:V or WP:RS. spazure (contribs) (review) 09:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thottbot isn't unique (it may be the first tho) but WoWhead and Allakhazam use similar techniques to essentially do the same thing: extract data from the game by collecting data from players during play. I suggest a new article "MMO item database" (or something like that), with an introduction section explaining the purpose of these sites (to provide players with specific info on mobs, drops and quests etc), the technique used (plugin within the gameclient), pro's (collects items that can really be found in the game) and con's (droprates might be inaccurate for newly introduced items or items that drop under certain conditions). Then a list of each site could be given with strengths, weaknesses or features; Thottbot for being first, WoWhead for it's advanced filter features. It would then also be possible to include a section other MMO (as in not World of Warcraft) datacollection sites. What do you think? Felsir (talk) 11:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to a new article suggestion 

message: I'm removing the proposed deletion.  This article survived an afd just a few weeks ago  Don't game the system: give it a bit of time. Watchsmart (talk) 04:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be nice if some of the "articles by established scholars" mentioned in the AfD discussion would be referenced in the article..? --Stormie (talk) 07:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the Prod 

message: I think a PIRATE class would be awesome. There's more than enough ocean out there and coastal cities to visit or plunder...both alliance and horde. Ideas?
                                Dryder  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.130.8.8 (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone else think there should be new classes in WoW?
Talk:Honnō-ji

message: Isn't Honno-ji Temple pleonastic, if ji already means "temple"? --Wetman 21:40, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. For that reason I moved the article. Fg2 21:52, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
I would love to see more links and maybe more explanation on why and how these is referenced in the way it is (besides just a link to 'Incident at Honno-ji' 
I made the edit of adding Samurai Warriors to places this temple was referenced. Jastha08 (talk) 16:44, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Metal Works '73–'93

message: I have this compilation and Windows Media Player tells me it's only 5:04.  I also heard the song on Pandora off of The Essential Judas Priest and I think I heard an extra verse.  are there two studio recordings of this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.67.222 (talk) 07:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exciter inconsistancy?
Talk:Frankston line

message: I added the infrastructure section, but I am not familiar with the infrastructure after Cheltenham station. -- <SPAN STYLE="font-family:monospace; color:#006666; background-color:#ffff99; border-color:#ff0000; border-width:1px; border-style:solid; "> B.d.mills </SPAN> (Talk) 22:10, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Early text

message: as this is in important part of the line's future  I don't see why it has basically 0 mention in the article. Although it isn't comfirmed yet it should have some mentioning in the article probably like a sentence or two NotOrrio (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the PTV 2025 map that won't be the case. You also just wrote "although it may not be confirmed"?! HoHo3143 (talk) 06:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @NotOrrio I've just done a quick google search and nothing has come up- where have you heard this? HoHo3143 (talk) 06:40, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: it won't be present in 2025 as the two lines being connected will happen in stage four of the Network Development Plan Metropolitan Rail. To clarify I saw this in the following pdf   uploaded to PTV NotOrrio (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and made a one sentence mention. HoHo3143 (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

text: corrected it to although it isn't comfirmed yet  as that was what i was trying to originally say NotOrrio (talk) 06:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  no mention of the line being connected to the craigieburn line 

message: Waiting on Template talk:Rail-interchange#Template-protected edit request on 7 February 2023. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been fixed. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route maps have an error 
Talk:Freedom of Information Act

message: Freedom of Information Act (in English) could refer to.
*The "Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act" of a number of Canadian provinces
*Freedom of Information Act 2000 the legislation of England and Wales
*Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 the legislation of Scotland
*Freedom of Information Act (United States) the United States legislation
*The Irish "Freedom of Information Act" of 1997
*The Australian "Freedom of Information Act" of 1982
*possibly more.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jooler (talk • contribs) 08:04, 21 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mz7 (talk) 19:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello bd2412. I have nominated this redirect for discussion – see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 23#Freedom of Information Act. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this is a redirect to [[Freedom of information legislation]]
Talk:Janove Ottesen

message: This is rather poorly written, isn't it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.96.21 (talk) 06:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Y'know what is NPOV though? "He is the HOTTEST performer in Kaizers Orchestra" Truefax and DO WANT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.170.84.2 (talk) 12:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Linux distributions

message: Where is the Chinese backed distribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceros (talk • contribs) 29 okt 2006 04:48‎ (UTC)
I tried adding openKylin twice but it keeps getting reverted. First by TechnoSquirrel69 because it wasn't sourced even though it links to Kylin which has a line on openKylin. I added links to an article and the official website for my second attempt but it was reverted by Manticore because it was "not notable". Do I have to build out an entire page dedicated to openKylin before I can add it to this list? It has 1 M users I would call that notable. Ironsmith-K (talk) 02:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, entries listed here should be notable and have a standalone article, meaning an article that is directly about the distribution being added, rather than a redirect to an article that mentions it briefly. WP:AFC is a good place to get started with such an article.  - Aoidh (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese distribution
File talk:Davos WEF Golden Calf.png

message: From WP:IFD:
*:Image:Davos WEF Golden Calf.png -- OR CV -- this image is a scan of a newspaper clipping, it's an orphan and a copyright vio.  --Wgfinley 19:32, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CP is for suspected copyvios, this is an obvious one, not only is it a vio of an AP photo, it's a vio of the caption the newspaper used, it's plain and simple copyright infringement and I can see no reasonable case for fair use on this.  --Wgfinley 21:13, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to read my response to your notice on my talk page. I do not agree with your assessment. Nor do I agree with your interpretation of the roles of WP:CP and WP:IFD. BTW, it's a Keystone image, not an AP one. Not that it would matter much, but at least get your facts straight. Lupo 22:36, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Might want to look at it again before chiding me on facts -- image clearly credited: "Fabrice Coffini/Associated Press/Keystone" -- since Keystone is a European agency I'm assuming AP purchased the rights for use in the US, you got the image from a US paper, whatever the case, it's clearly marked AP.  --Wgfinley 07:35, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:InterCity Express (CityTrain)

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 22:53, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: I have uploaded a new picture of the Inter City Express Class. If the Unit is to dirty, please feel free to revert back to the previous picture. Qld matt 12:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Change
Talk:Eve Libertine

message: Is Eve a vegetarian or a vegan? If she's one or the other, would it be fair to categorize her as an English vegetarian or English vegan?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Groar! (talk • contribs) 19:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegetarian/Vegan? 
Talk:Robert Vaughn Young

message: Does anyone have dates when RVY joined and left the CoS, and when he did editing on Mission:Earth?  Seems to me that these would help put the article in context -- how long he was in, how long after his editing experience he left... -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:58, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates? 

message: I consider the edits  by Justanother to be an example of bad faith. A simple google search shows his notability, and also that he authored that book.  --Tilman 19:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Fortunately a lot of his writings and postings to alt.religion.scientology have been archived.  He was one of the best human rights advocates in a.r.s.  It's a damn shame that he didn't live long enough to see Anonymous come on board. Fredric Rice (talk) 04:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writings Archived 
Talk:Awjila language

message: The section Conclusion may be wrong, because there are informations that Awjilah is spoken regularly on Facebook. Facebook isn't known for old members, especially not in developing countries. The assumption that there are no younger ones learning Awjilah seems to be wrong.--Ermanarich (talk) 14:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the Facebook data actually confirms the conclusion that Awjili is dying.  For a full discussion, see the article Marijn van Putten and I wrote in Corpus: http://journals.openedition.org/corpus/2593 . - Lameen Souag (talk) 10:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Dying or not dying?

message: "Tawjilit" is an Algerian+Moroccan Berber name for Awjili, not attested in Awjili itself.  The Awjili name for Awjili is žlan n Awilən (language of Awjilis). - Lameen Souag (talk) 10:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "Tawjilit"
Talk:Paris, Yukon

message: This is absurd. There is no such place in the Yukon, let alone one that is almost the same area as France. -- User:Luigizanasi
I must admit I was wrong when I suggested speedy deletion. And I am on the board of the Association Franco-Yukonnaise. Hanging my head in shame. Luigizanasi 01:38, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Paris was a place... so can we put a date in there?  Even if it's just a decade?  I'm guessing it was associated with a gold rush, but what do I know about Paris, Yukon?  Nothing.  So does anybody know when Paris was?  The Literate Engineer 21:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was? 

message: List of songs about ParisShadowy Men on a Shadowy Planet’s “Memories of Gay Paree was most likely about Paris, Ontario. The video featured a scale model layout of Paris, France.Civic Cat (talk) 19:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: any songs about Paris?
Talk:Millersville, Maryland

message: regarding speedy deletion: page was defaced, it's back to normal now, though still under construction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drew.poland (talk • contribs) 19:21, 20 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page recovery

message: Is George Miller the first postmaster of the post office that opened in 1841? Just want to clarify what he was the first postmaster of. DAK4Blizzard (talk) 08:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: George Miller
Talk:ASA

message: Would it not make sense to combine this page with ASA? three links could easily be incorporated into the ASA disambiguation page. Or move ASA to here, either would work.70.49.36.110 23:23, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. However, it may be too onerous to find all the links into this page and to update them. As well, in the future people may end up re-creating this page... Instead, I chose to keep both pages, using ASA for the related initialisms and Asa for names. ppblais 03:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Exactly. I came to this talk page to make precisely that point, but I see that you have already done so eloquently. I'll fix it. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comments 

message: do not move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Dwelling

message: This page didnt give me any information!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.235.57.1 (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Residences. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 23:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Residences" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pulseless electrical activity

message: :This contradicts with the Mypocardial Infarction page. Eyu100
I deleted hypocalcemia, which is not generally considered during the secondary survey when faced with PEA arrest.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.250.1 (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but if the hypocalcaemia was known before the arrest, treating it will be useful! JFW | T@lk 16:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This might be useful: doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.019 JFW | T@lk 19:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490 JFW | T@lk 22:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special report
Talk:Chris Lewis (cricketer)

message: One of the most talented English cricketers of the 1990s, being an aggressive lower-order batsman, fine fast-medium bowler and an able all-round English fielder, he never did justice to his undoubted talent, despite playing 30 test matches.
Maybe someone, who knows something about cricket, can change this sentence.
Sarcelles 23:33, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: did some work to de-POV and wikilink Feco 20:25, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: () --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:22, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 

message: I know that drug smuggling is usually associated with organized crime but what is the exact connection? This is not explained by the article. Was Lewis an active participant, or was he duped to be a mule by someone? What about the wider organisation that enabled his offending? How Lewis became involved in this smuggling needs a better explanation, so a link to organised crime can be sustained and also so inclusion in WikiProject Organized Crime can be justified, otherwise it is just a crime. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 06:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection with organized crime