lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dulcin

message: "However, an FDA study in 1951 raised many questions about its safety, resulting in its removal from the market in 1954 after animal testing revealed chronic toxicity."
According to this source:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=189.145
The FDA has already forbidden Dulcin as of January 19, 1950, so how does that fit to the dates mentioned above? /Mecki (talk) 22:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: it seems you both are using the same source. The document itself mentions that the date of publication was Jan 18 1950. Cannot find a source saying the study was conducted in 1951. Aayush.garg.official (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

text: It is interesting to note that the publishing of the study happened in a book called Principles and Methods of Toxicology by wallace hayes. No further sources could be dug up in my internet searches. Could not find a digital pdf of this book or obtain it through a digital library. Its apparently page number 669. Also the study was not done by FDA so thats a bit misleading. Aayush.garg.official (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When exactly has the FDA forbidden Dulcin?
Talk:Hans Camenzind

message: This article and the article on 555 timer IC are inconsistent in terms of the year of the design of the IC.
ICE77 (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of design 

message: Anyone care to include the pronunciation of Camenzind in the article- I dont know how too!  CPES (talk) 09:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Camenzind is a Swiss German surname. A YouTube video about Oscar Camenzind confirms that the pronunciation is something like kahman-tzint. An IPA expert would be needed to express that accurately. --50.53.53.209 (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank-you, Nardog. --50.53.53.209 (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camenzind pronunciation

message: Seriously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2601:C5:C001:E410:6DAE:DC53:894E:473
Why would u not want to link to this man's own youtube channel? Please argue against it! It will only help to delegitimize the Wikipedia project.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C5:C001:E410:6DAE:DC53:894E:473 (talk) 12:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even read what that bot (not people) told you?  It said undo if you thought it was an appropriate link.  So I did that for you.  Thanks for finding that channel. Dicklyon (talk) 17:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is wrong with you people?
Talk:Albert Ingham

message: A recent edit by a contributor claiming to be one of Ingham's sons says that Ingham didn't have a PhD. A record exists at the Mathematics Genealogy Project, but I can't find any entries for an A. Ingham at http://www.theses.com/ (a comprehensive list of UK doctoral theses from 1716) and his MacTutor biography makes no mention of a PhD.
The information was in the first version of this page in 2006. That user hasn't been active since 2007 and no references were supplied. I'm going to rewrite the article in line with the information available in the MacTutor biography. Gareth Jones (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PhD? 

message: In the article, the "exists in" symbol is used just before the capital "O". This seems to be a mistake for "=". See Big O notation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.219.253 (talk) 11:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Both symbols can be used, with big O.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.219.253 (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: K9re11 has put in an = symbol.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:99A5:9E01:792B:BE8C:EAEA:3477 (talk) 14:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible mistake
Talk:The Lonely Londoners

message: There is little or nothing about the novel itself here and that is what an article about the novel should contain. It needs a good lead paragraph summarising the notabliity and success of the novel. Then it needs ==Plot summary==, ==Characters in "~title of novel~"==, ==Literary significance & criticism==, ==Release details==, ==Footnotes== and sources sections as a minimum. Thanks for the efforts so far though. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 17:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What exactly does that mean (to be found in the opening paragraph)? Shouldn't there be at least a link / reference to some other article? <KF> 00:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In the beat writer tradition"? 
Talk:Sides of an equation

message: Sometimes when you evolve an expression, you will use equals signs to separate the different versions of the expression. If one of the sides in an equation is evolved that way, what you will end up with is an equation that contains more than one equals signs. What do you call the different "sides" then? Do they have some special name or do you just call them "expressions" or "parts of an equation"? —Kri (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean like (x+1)(x+2)=x(x+2)+1(x+2)=x2+2x+x+2=x2+3x+2? No special name I know of. "Right-hand side" isn't much of a special name either; it's just the side on the right. But I have seen at least one math teacher write "RHS" on the blackboard surrounded by algebra, and if you weren't paying attention you wouldn't know what it stood for. Art LaPella (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about if the equation has more than one equals sign?
Talk:LMNT

message: Sorry, seeing as how they've been defunct for five years I just had to remove this: "They are very good and do pop and rock music."Estreya 15:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: Some time ago, I made an attempt to create an article about the "All Sides" album, but my attempts were rejected. After beeing reviewed, those in charge of deciding which new articles actually get published decided there was not enough info on this album to require it's own article, and that it would be better if I added my proposed article be added to this one. So, that's what I did! :)
As I still cosider myself new, I may have made some newb mistakes. I'll be double checking soon, but if any more experienced editors feel something wasn't quite done right, feel free to fix it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TSJSwimmer (talk • contribs) 00:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just added an "All Sides" section.
Talk:Dirty Looks (Pennsylvania band)

message: Has this cd only been released on cdbaby.com or has it been released in stores as well?
68.111.96.110 18:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gasoline 

message: There's an earlier band of the same name, formed in NY and signed to Stiff records. See http://punkmodpop.free.fr/dirtylooks_pic.htm --Pfold (talk) 17:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier band 
Talk:Principal Private Secretary

message: I fail to see in what the Yes Minister quote provides any explanation at all regarding Principal Private Secretaries. 81.249.67.214 (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes Minister 
Talk:Lady Penelope (comic)

message: I thought it worth pointing to some great art in amongst the quite long run of this often-overlooked title. In particular John M Burns drew the Space Family Robinson strip; all original, not licensed Gold Key material as stated in the Wiki entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikelake1 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artists on the Lady Penelope Comic 
Talk:Johann Eck

message: Removed the following warning from the article introduction. Is relevant point for the discussion page, however, so I am pasting it here:
WARNING!!!: Much of the following article appears to have been written by someone either engaging in a pro-Lutheran, anti-Catholic polemic, or relying upon such a polemic for their information. It is not at all clear that Catholics would regard Eck's positions as Semi-Pelagian, or that references to his physical appearance are in anyway relevant. Caveat lector!
Soonercary 16:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I assesed this article as a B as although it is thorough but as noted above it still contains NNPOV and is in desperate need of citation.
:A pitty there's no C-class. My investigation in assessment instead indicate something like start class. I'll add a few templates: the article is in heavy need of more inline citations. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 20:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assesment (needs citation)

message: "Defender" of catholic faith? That's not a neutral description: he started to harass Luther for heresy so that the Reformation became much more exaggerated. That's not a defence proper, rather it is an offensive attack. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 20:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Defender?

message: Neutrality of this Article is to be questioned. Sections "Disputations with Luther and Karlstadt", "Attacks on Luther and Melanchthon", "Papal emissary and inquisitor" and "Zwingli and his followers" lack sources all together and seem to be written by pro-lutheran bias.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.66.215.213 (talk) 18:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put in the inline citations. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality questioned
Talk:Richard Watson Gilder

message: For editors who wish to contribute to this article, please remember that you need to provide the best sourcing information that you can (in the form of metadata on the sources), and even multiple sources for each single item of new information, before adding that new information to the article. I, and likely others also, can help with formatting both the information to be added along with metadata describing the sources (the references). Please consider thoroughly discussing your new information, along with the sources for that information, with the other editors who have an interest in this present article. Please discuss anything using this very Talk page in order to get the feedback from other editors. Best regards. --L.Smithfield (talk) 04:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributing new information to this article 

message: Hello Closer1616, are you available to answer some questions about the Gilder family? If so, give me a reply here. Thanks. --L.Smithfield (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gathering sources for contributions to Gilder-related articles
Talk:Cleridae

message: First of all, you did a good job covering this broad topic. My group had to cover genus Chrysomya, so I know how difficult it is to include everything. One thing I will suggest is although you listed the subfamilies of the genus, maybe focus on one or two of the important species and mention them more in depth. Just an idea. Other than that, you had a very good description of the different habitats that Cleridae inhabits. I also was very impressed with the way you split up the forensic importance by stored product and medico-legal entomology. Overall, this article was very educational and very easy to read. Well done. Msrubar (talk) 02:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested changes and comments
Talk:Postal privatisation bills

message: I have suggested that this article could be merged with Japan Post; discussion on that topic is held at Talk:Japan Post. However, if this article is kept separate the title is not good. The article covers one specific event. I do not know how the bill is referred to in Japanese, but I can imagine that something like "The postal privatisation bill", "The Japanese postal privatisation bill", something mentioning the name of the proposer, or... actually anything that tells it covers one specific event. // habj 16:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. --87.20.245.140 19:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:South Hempstead, New York

message: New York 4th Congressional District
* Kirsten Gillibrand [D]and Charles Schumer [D], Senators
* Kathleen Rice [D] – Representative
New York State
* Andrew Cuomo, Governor
* Thomas DiNapoli, Comptroller
* Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General
* Todd Kaminsky [D], Senator for District 9 (Kaminsky@nysenate.gov)
* Brian Curran, Assembly for District 21 (curranb@assembly.state.ny.us)
 
Nassau County
* Edward Mangano, County Executive
* Laura Curran [D], Legislator for District 5
* Madeline Singas [D], District Attorney
* Michael Sposato, Sheriff
* Beaumont Jefferson, County Treasurer
* George Maragos, Comptroller
* Maureen O'Connell, County Clerk
Town of Hempstead
* Anthony Santino, Supervisor (asantino@tohmail.org)
* Anthony P. D'Esposito, Council Member 4th District (adesposito@tohmail.org)
Rockville Centre School Board of Education [as of 5/31/16]
* Liz  Dion, President 
* Mayda Kramer, Vice President 
* Gregg Spaulding, Secretary 
* Mark Masin, Trustee   
* John O'Shea, Trustee 
Rockville Centre Public Library Board [as of 5/31/16]
* Andrea Maher, President
* William S. Murray, Jr., Vice President
* Charles Kelleher, Trustee
* Eileen Burke Bucaria, Trustee
* Christine Glass, Trustee  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottUSF (talk • contribs) 13:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elected Officials for South Hempstead
Talk:That's Cat

message: –…Sharpsputnik 00:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I remember this show also! Problem is, seems like i am the only one. I can't seem to find any info on this show anywhere! Wish someone had clips to post or something...it was a GREAT show! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gdduran (talk • contribs) 02:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I remember... 

message: Yeah, I remember this on Saturday mornings...real early, before 'School House Rock'  It was a bizarre show I have to say...just had that smell of 'groovy kids show' ...but it's definately a fond memory sitting back watching it with a bowl of Smurf Berry Crunch cereal :)
If anyone can find video would be great...I might find something on my dad's old betamax tapes...I'll take a looky.
Jon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.205.49.165 (talk) 05:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's Cat
Talk:Symphony No. 6 (Shostakovich)

message: And I just wonder what the orchestration is... --Kschwerdt514 16:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Orcheatration is added.Addaick 07:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I've listened to the Sixth a few times and I'm struck by similarities between the first movement and Barbers Adagio for Strings. Graham1973 (talk) 02:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspired by Barbers Adagio for Strings?
Talk:Deanery

message: I propose merging Deanery and Dean (religion), as they are both aspects of the same institution - "Dean" is the title of the office held, "Deanery" is the jurisdiction circumscribed by the office. bd2412 T 20:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge. 
Talk:Northern emerald

message: I made this article, there is a , there is a distribution , there is  a reference, a description of the preferred environment something on the living habits. And there is a clear picture. On the other hand this is a species of dragonfly indigenous to Great Brittain, so the qualification as low on the importance scale contradicts the former qualification as a stub. 
Viridiflavus (talk) 21:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Logicians

message: I oppose Hegel's inclusion in this category.
True: Hegel called parts of his philosophy "logic".
True: There are no completely precise and universally accepted criteria as to what is and what isn't logic.
But: The parts of Hegel's philosophical output which he called "logic" are so dramatically different from what anybody else in the category produced, and from the methodological standards anybody else in the category upheld, that Hegel shouldn't be in here. Calling something "logic" does not make it logic.
--Skon 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the categories were more precisely defined, we might have separate categories for Mathematical or Symbolic Logicians such as Kurt Gödel (who generally express logical argument using symbols) and Philosophical Logicians such as Wittgenstein and Hegel (who explore the structure of logical argument using words). Many, perhaps most, of the logicians in this category are mathematical logicians (which is possibly but not necessarily the same as mathematicians and logicians). But I think Wikipedia's category system is much too crude to support this degree of refinement. See my comment below. --RichardVeryard 09:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a strong anti-Hegel POV within Anglo-American twentieth-century philosophy, and so the inclusion/exclusion of Hegel is potentially a POV question. --RichardVeryard 09:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hegel a logician? 

message: You'd have thought that this category would be the most logical one in Wikipedia. Or perhaps you wouldn't. I am puzzled why some logicians are categorized by (one or more) nationality and some aren't. Ludwig Wittgenstein is under "Logicians" and both "Austrian philosophers" and "British philosophers", while Kurt Gödel (described on his own page as "one of the most significant logicians of all time") is under "Austrian logicians" and "American mathematicians" but not "Logicians". --RichardVeryard 13:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify my point here. I do not think this is a problem that can be fixed merely by recategorizing a couple of well-known logicians. Given the way these overlapping categories have been designed, it is almost inevitable that such anomalies will exist. --RichardVeryard 11:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategories 

message: Why isn't Frege listed here? Or, in other words, Why isn't Frege listed here?
Furthermore, Why isn't Frege listed here? 
So basically I just wonder: Why isn't Frege listed here?
T85.166.160.236 (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't Frege listed here?
Talk:National Art Museum of Ukraine

message: Need a current photo to be placed in the infobox museum. I searched commons to no avail. Any other resources? -asmadeus 16:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Give me a day to find a photo. A question. Many images in the gallery seem to me to be located in other museums (Repin, Pushkin, Lopukhina, etc.). Please recheck. --Irpen 18:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. I included the gallery of the images of the above mentioned artists, not necesserily confirming that they are IN the actual National Art Museum. I will check one by one in a bit. -asmadeus 20:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Photo of National Art Museum 
Template talk:Map requested

message: Can we put a map in the template, instead of the "Question-mark-picture-frame?" This would distinguish it from image requests, which this template branched off of. OverMyHead 16:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a proposed image to use. Please make your view known on the "WikiProject Maps" talk page. This is NOT a vote. OverMyHead 16:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a very good image. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 12:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in template 

message: I added the :Category:Templates needing talk links and other improvements to this template. It needs a talk page link. The template could be accompanied by a short talk page note describing what map, where it would be placed and optionally why it would improve the article. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 12:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template needing talk links and other improvements
Talk:5-simplex

message: In the article, you can read: "For example, the Cartesian coordinates for the vertices of a hexateron (not centered in the origin!), with edge length equal to 2 \sqrt{2}, may be:"
I think it's actually centered in the origin. Might it be spam or vandalism? --Daniel bg 16:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However, it was already in the first edition. Can someone explain me this? --Daniel bg 16:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I didn't add the coordinates, but easy to check - all vertices should be equal distance from all others. Definitely not centered on origin in 4th and 5th coordinates since they're all positive. Tom Ruen 00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartesian coordinates 

message: Somehow this doesn't sound like a good way to word it. I think the article should explain that "tera-" was from the SI prefix. 4 T C 03:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  corruption of "tetra" 

message: I would like to seek advice on how to clarify the matchstick problem in the second line:
The 5-simplex is a solution to the problem: Make 20 equilateral triangles using 15 matchsticks, where each side of every triangle is exactly one matchstick.
I believe that this needs further explanation and qualification; namely that it requires 5 dimensions for each side (and therefore each face, cell, and facet) to be equal in (respective) dimensions. For this solution to hold true in lower dimensions, you would need to project the 5-simplex, deforming the dimensions.
I humbly suggest that someone with more than armchair experience opine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MC the MD (talk • contribs) 03:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Matchstick Problem
Talk:Religion in France

message: User:Lic. Carlos most statistics put the percentage of Catholics between 48% to 60%, Here is a Example
*48%-50%
*57%-60%Les protestants en France en 2017 Ipsos.
the date of the 2019 Eurobarometer  simply does not fit with that of the past years, The Ipsos Group is a global market research from France I agree that the Eurobarometer is generally a good source, I liked that you added it, but you can't just remove the other statistics because you considered it outdated.(The Sr Guy (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I really thought it was 2018 sorry ;-;. let's leave the article as it is now, I just didn't like that you removed the Pie chart from Ipsos. (The Sr Guy (talk) 20:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  OUTDATED data?, Not exactly.

message: This article is getting bigger and thus the "Christianity" section is long enough to have its own article. I will move the contents to "Christianity in France. Sesroh Fo Maerd I (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Separating "Christianity" section

message: Hello,
I'd thought I'd just warn people on here to not revert the edit I made about the Eurobarometer citation because I read through the whole thing, and there was no evidence of France's opinion on God and Life Force. The polls provided with these options was not France and the whole survey was about what religious leaders are doing to impact society, whether it's been positive or negative. That was the main article, not debating on an existence of a life force or deity. In future, please, please be careful when giving out this information as you could always end up with misconceptions and misunderstandings, which would then lead to disagreements. Please read the citation properly first before adding it to the page. I hope everyone understands. MountainLaurel88 (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurobarometer 

message: The long paragraph about the Nouvelle Droite in Paganism seems to be undue weight, relevant for a different article.
No other denomination's section is given a long paragraph about an extremist fringe, and here it has no balancing with other more common beliefs. If included it would require a balanced overview of all political groups in Paganism too - which is likely beyond the scope of this article, if the other denominations are to be used as example. 
Does anyone contest or have an alternative solution? Vaurnheart (talk) 12:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics in Paganism 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Oriental Orthodoxy in France. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 24#Oriental Orthodoxy in France until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 00:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Oriental Orthodoxy in France" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]