lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Etobicoke School of the Arts

message: Okay, we really need to address the Notable Alumni issue. In my opinion, any person who doesn't have a reference or a wikipedia page to their name should be deleted, and I am prepared to do so in a week. So if anyone is actually reading this, please tell me what you think. (Yohowithrum (talk) 20:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 

message: This passage seems to depart from NPOV:
::With an abnormally high number of students passing both the literacy test and the Grade 9 math test, ESA is one of the highest quality secondary institutions in Toronto, Ontario and is recognized as the oldest and best arts high school in Canada.
Dcandeto 07:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You still need to cite sources to back that up.  And please sign your posts with ~~~~.  Dcandeto 07:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I will leave the edit to someone else but... I believe the claim that it is Canada's oldest arts-focused high school is wrong. As far as I know "F.A.C.E. School" is the oldest (founded in 1975). Please see the wiki page for it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.A.C.E._School
Unless you have a reference for that claim, that sentence should be edited out. And P.S. Please give us a break with the anti-gay comments!--Pollysix 19:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest Arts School

message: After reviewing the article per the criteria listed on WP:WIAGA, I have observed that it does not meet the criteria for the following reasons. Please feel free to use these as starting points in an improvement of the article.
*  The amount and type of referencing is poor compared to the length and breadth of the article. Some specifics to consider are: 
# A citation to the school's district profile is a borderline-appropriate source, especially to the claim of the school's venerable age. As the district has a vested interest in making its schools look good, it is not an independent, third-party source.
# The History and Application sections especially need references.
* The article needs structural work. Overview sections ideally come before History sections in most GA-class articles. 
* The list of alumni, in addition to being completely unreferenced, is borderline trivia. This is especially so in consideration of the lack of an intro or other significant encyclopedic text in the section.
Some positive aspects I found in the article were that notability was clearly established in the introduction without any unnecessary cheerleading, and the article seemed to be very comprehensive in its coverage. VanTucky 17:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Failed 

message: I have rated this article as C/Low. The article is long and well written, however the lack of referencing severely affects the article's rating. If this article was properly referenced, then I expect it would be able to achieve GA standard. TheAuthor22 (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:WPSCH]] Assessment January 2011
Talk:Fucose

message: The objection I have with the current layout is the enormous swath of white space in the middle. I don't understand why the Fischer projection absolutely must line up with structure; the page is short enough that without the white space, everything lines up with structure. Isopropyl 07:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: whats with the picture? its quite poor both in resolution and technical accuracy. Xcomradex 01:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

text: i mean the first picture, the fischer projection is nice, and imo should replace the other picture. Xcomradex 01:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: Substance Identifier "2438-80-4 ">substances (1)>get references (12004)>refine "2000-" (7635)>refine "Review" (121)
translation: 12004 patents, articles, abstracts..., of which 7635 have appeared since the year 2000 (about 1 each day).  121 reviews have appeared since 2000.  Top cited reviews:
*Fucose: biosynthesis and biological function in mammals By Becker, Daniel J.; Lowe, John B. From Glycobiology (2003), 13(7), 41R-53R. (cited 391 times)
* Sulfated fucans, fresh perspectives: structures, functions, and biological properties of sulfated fucans and an overview of enzymes active toward this class of polysaccharide By Berteau, Olivier; Mulloy, Barbara From Glycobiology (2003), 13(6), 29R-40R. (cited 304 times)
*The Role of Protein Glycosylation in Allergy By Altmann, Friedrich International Archives of Allergy and Immunology (2007), 142(2), 99-115.  (cited 192 times).
--Smokefoot (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: CAS report
Talk:White Bear Lake Township, Pope County, Minnesota

message: Sorry, but I live in White Bear Township and there are most definately more than 440 people!  ...Also, I don't know why this is somehow linked to Pope County, but White Bear Township is in Ramsey County.
:For some odd reason there seem to be a number of people under the impression that there is a White Bear Township and a separate White Bear Lake Township in Ramsey County. I believe there IS a White Bear Lake Township in Pope County. Unfortunately, I have no idea what to do with these two pages. I'll try and find someone who can. --Sable232 19:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, never mind, I figured it out. --Sable232 19:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population? 

message: White Bear Lake Township is located in Pope County, near Starbuck, Minnesota. There is also a White Bear Township located in northern Ramsey County. --Sable232 20:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note
Talk:Chiaroscuro: The Private Lives of Leonardo da Vinci

message: I can't find ISBN's for the original comics. If anyone has a copy of the originals, can you look behind the cover and post the ISBN's? Eilu 07:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN's 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  12:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:WOI-DT

message: The changes make it sound like WOI is a PBS station. Are these changes correct or vandalism? Chris 02:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public broadcasting? 

message: While it might be nice to add in this station not running the Colbert SuperPAC commercial, it really isn't needed here as a tv station not running a commercial is not really notable.  TV stations do this all the time.  Nothing wrong with mentioning it on the Colbert SuperPAC page though since it could be notable for the SuperPAC itself.  IMHO  Mateinsixtynine (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colbert SuperPAC commercial 
Talk:WOOD-TV

message: Would it be fair to include their erroneous coverage of Asimov's Science Fiction magazine from 2004? 67.184.132.39 (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Asimov's

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 18:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: While I realize the coordinates given in the sidebar probably came from the FCC database, if you plug those into Google Earth and compare them with the location shown when you instead Search 42.687400, -85.509730 in Google Earth, zooming in to less than 1000 feet should make clear which set of coordinates is closer to the actual tower/transmitter location. Hope that helps! Darr247 (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Transmitter Location
Talk:WORA-TV

message: WORA-TV had at least one older logo (featuring a blocky numeral 5 with seagulls inside its bowl), used until 1998 (I do not recall when it was first used, since I was a very small child back then). Does anybody here have authorized access to such nostalgic logo (and a fair-use rationale for uploading it here, since non-free logos require fair-use rationale or otherwise they end up like :File:Tele12 logo.JPG which was once used on WOLE-TV)? --SilSinn9821 (talk) 22:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older logo(s)? 
Talk:WORO-DT

message: Efectivo en Mayo de 2007 tras el despido de Angelo Medina Tele-Oro Cancelo el espacio conocido como "Deportes - 13" esa Parte tiene que ser editada y actualizada.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.6.201.179 (talk) 06:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deportes 13 ya no es parte de la identidad del Canal. 
Talk:WOWT

message: The article currently says it was started by Meredith. This [link] says that Meredith bought the WOW property in 1958. The Woodmen of the World had started the radio but had spun it off to an independent leasee by then. This part of the station's history is very history and we should work to get it right. Americasroof 15:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meredith Founding?

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:West Virginia Public Broadcasting

message: West Virginia Public Broadcasting is not just a TV station -- it is a joint licensee network of public radio and television stations.  Check out the West Virginia Public Broadcasting site for more info; there are also other errors about the history of the stations. I would really like to make sure that this article is correct, but I think it might be a conflict of interest to update the actual article because I work there. Is there any way that I can help fix this article? Mona anom (talk) 16:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Put the information you want updated on WikiProject Radio Stations or WikiProject Television Stations, depending on what information you want updated.  There will be plenty of users who will see the information, can check it, get references and can add it themselves bypassing the conflict of interest issue.  Please let me know if I can be of assistance as well. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 22:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major article problem
Talk:WPDE-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:WPHL-TV

message: Why was that Sailor Moon thing removed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.2.252 (talk • contribs) 
:Irrelevant and trivial information that was poorly written.  BTW, get an account so you can be accountable for your vandalism.  Rollosmokes 16:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime 

message: Is Wietlisbach still CFO of WPHL-TV?? Thanks. Quis separabit? 01:08, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruce Wietlisbach

message: There is no mention of PHL 17 being affiliated with PTEN. -- hmich176 00:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of PTEN affiliation
Talk:WPMI-TV

message: this is the station responsible for the infamous leprechaun story maybe something about that should be in here (video)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.195.26 (talk) 
:I agree.  /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 16:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Leprechaun story
Talk:WPMT

message: For the time being, this station is carrying a secondary affiliation with The WB. This will end when The CW debuts in the fall. Since sister-station WPHL­TV will be affiliating with My Network TV, this station's secondary will likely also become MyNet. Right now, the WB programming is only carried in the late-night hours, causing some cable systems in this station's viewing area to import WPHL-TV. This fact has caused an edit war on the WPHL-TV page. Hopefully, adding a few mentions of the "other" station, in passing, to this page will help to cool tensions. AlexDW 17:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding WB affil, sister WPHL-TV 

message: "Pennsylvania Movie Time" might have been the original slogan (see this 1985 station ID:  ) but by the late 1980s (when I was old enough to remember), the station was advertising as "Pride in My Town". See this 1986 station ID:  97.102.30.205 (talk) 13:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call Sign Meaning
Talk:WPSU-TV

message: Most of the content in the previous version was transferred wholesale from the WPSU Website . My God, does anyone here have any concept of copyright???????? Blueboy96 16:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia community does care about and strives to avoid copyright infringement, but public education is a work in progress. Thanks, GChriss <always listening><c> 05:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: Although WPSU-TV and WPSU-FM are broadcast in different media, the source organization is exactly the same. (Compare to Fox News Radio in Fox News Channel, although not exactly analogous.) Thoughts/objections to merging the two under a new article entitled WPSU? The proposed merger would import content into WPSU-TV with a subsequent rename to WPSU. Thanks, GChriss <always listening><c> 05:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[WPSU-FM]] 

message: In 2018, WPSU changed its logo to show one that contains its callsign in all lower clase letters with a "play button" inside the P. J4lambert (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: New logo required

message: This article needs a major rewrite; I put a request in to the Guild of Copy Editors. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2018
Talk:WATN-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced or improperly referenced names as entries to the list of former employees in the article. Not including this type of material in articles abides by current consensus and is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:WPXD-TV

message: https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/ew-scripps-ion-media-acquire-tv-stations-1234782059/
Note if this deal is to be approved then stations like WXYZ, WMYD and WPXD are subjected to be divested if this is goes through2601:640:C600:3C20:15D7:1FA7:5B26:4C11 (talk) 02:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: EW Scripps in talks to get Ion Media

message: I've corrected some mistakes about channel numbers. WPXD was never on digital channel 31, its been on 33 since the switch. 31 is just its virtual channel and old analog number. For more info see WPXD in the FCC TV station database. TomCat4680 (talk) 04:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to switch the current channel number back to 31.  If 33 was used it was at 48kw.  Just rechecked and 31 is physical and virtual channel number.--Suzdrewz (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Something is missing or in error in the FCC database at the moment.  31 at 184kw recently had a license to cover. Perhaps the change to 50 has something to do with it. Due to the Minor change application they filed to the 31 permit.--Suzdrewz (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does it say that at the above link? As far as I can tell, they were rejected from using 19, so they're currently using 33, and 50 is their future channel after they complete their new transmitter. 31 is ONLY their virtual channel. TomCat4680 (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since your claim of 31 being the physical channel is unverifiable, I'm leaving the article as is. TomCat4680 (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Okay I fixed the wrong info. I think its all correct now. TomCat4680 (talk) 20:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as the physical/virtual channel situation, I have seen it best that in most television station articles, both should be included. Unfortunately on some articles in which I have edited the leads to include both channel allocations, users have opted to just include the virtual channel. The reasoning for including both is the fact that most television stations operate on two different channels: the physical digital channel and the virtual channel that is used in most cases to identify the channel as its analog-era allocation. In essence, the virtual channel should be mentioned first then the physical digital channel. TVtonightOKC (talk) 17:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Virtual channel vs physical channel

message: the back ground music is too loud on shows like FBI,Chicago Fire, SVU. Its hard to hear the talking. 2600:1702:3360:D4E0:BD80:BDAD:842B:4AB2 (talk) 03:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background music
Talk:Mixte

message: This seems to be a misspelling of the mispronounciation of the word mixte.  there is already an article mixte-frame with which this topic should be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Will.law (talk • contribs) 
:Article moved to mixte (from mixtie) to correct spelling. Mixte frame appears to be in violation of copyright; we'll therefore wait for that process before merging. jareha (comments) 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspelling
Talk:WPXL-TV

message: Someone is changing the phrasing of virtual channel references from "Through the use of PSIP" to "However".  This reduces the quality of the article as it suggests that it is unknown how a virtual channel is established.  The editor should identify him/herself and explain the merits of this change.  In the interim, I will revert all NOLA TV pages back.
Sore bluto (talk) 20:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: PSIP
Talk:WPXW-TV

message: Could you add a signal contour map to the WPXW and WWPX articles (showing both stations) like you did at WUVN? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2023