Talk:Maurice Bishop

message: There is another Maurice Bishop who is a well known artist based in Dunster, Somerset - see www.mauricebishop.co.uk
I am not necessarily qualified to edit this article, but I thought this part stands out as particularly NOT NPOV; it sounds like a pep talk or political speech: "...as well as people from every facet of Grenadian life. It was a groundswell that reverberated in every village from the tip of Point Salines to the peak at Leaper's Hill. People who had never before been particularly active in the political life of the nation stood up to be counted on that fateful day. The government had made a habit of naming and prefacing every action in the name of the people; but on 19th October 1983, the people harnessed that power and freed Maurice Bishop from house arrest. The release, however, was bittersweet..."  I would recommend that someone change the wording in that entire section, or remove it altogether.   Insignificant1 14:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - Its is factually incorrect to call the NJM revolution of 1979 a "coup d'etat". What happened in sense fit the definition of that term. 
- The commentary on Gairy's government is political POV.
- The long commentary on the issues concerning the airport is also POV. I cannot find proof that the events described actually happened. The paragraph is also POV because it is little more than a overly long after the fact justification for seeking aid from Cuba for the airport. Theories about the "trajectory" of the NJM have no place in the article.
- The long paragraph about worker's councils and Bishop's "intent was to transform Grenada into a socialist state in the mold of other Eastern bloc nations" is full of POV and opinion. It also factually misrepresents the nature of the "workers' councils and their relationship to the NJM government. The material in question, like the material on the airport has little to do with Bishop himself and doesn't seem relivant to this article.
- The claims of the text with regard to the divisions within the NJM in 1983 is at best opinion and at worst the POV of the American government from 1983 & the Coard faction. There are no facts to support an ideological division in the party in 1983. There are few trustworthy facts of any sort to determine what the problems within the government were. The claim that "Growth remained stagnant" is also POV from the anti-Bishop factions within the NJM.
- The circumstances of Bishop's death deserve more than one sentance. We have entire paragraphs talking about the airport and almost nothing about the man's death.
- The material at the end of the US Invasion section about the airport being completed years later has nothing to do with Bishop. Its little more than an attempt to introduce a POV political point into the article about an unrelated subject. There are other more appropriate articles for those kind of issues.
70.234.193.225 03:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and factual corrections 

message: Was Bishop's daughter's name Kariin [sic] or Nadia? 76.21.8.213 (talk) 05:02, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: I've tagged the article because it has no inline citations, and its account of the PRA is POV.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 04:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing/POV 

message: Does it really make sense to list Bishop's "nationality" as "Aruban" in the infobox? He clearly was Grenadian during his political career and time in the government. Newyorkbrad (talk) 06:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: I've integrated a large amount of the article in Russian into this article. Those wishing to go further with this can find the Russian article at Jzsj (talk) 17:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translate from Russian 

message: Almost this entire entry seems to be very POV with hardly any citations. It seems like the last time anyone tagged it was 8 years ago?  Tortuga511 (talk) 05:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still very POV 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maurice Bishop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121026092129/http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20090531/news/news5.html to http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20090531/news/news5.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Details and chronology seem unreliable, particularly the unreferenced claim that: "In 1963–66, Bishop was president of the Students Association of Holborn College and in 1967 headed the association of students of the Royal College." Contradicting the dates in this, the article on Holborn College states that it was established in 1969 as Holborn Law College. Can anyone clarify? Proscribe (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education in London needs clarification