Talk:SUV

message: Discussing Hybrid Gas-Electric vehicles does not really belong in this article.
Especially references to specific vehicles, which sounds like advertisement.
It is perhaps only relevent in terms of Fuel economy.
Perhaps one when noting the poor gas millage of SUV's compared to other passenger vehicles, the "hybrid" gas milage could be mentioned. "While the average fuel economy of  SUV's is less than 20 mpg, some gas-electric hybrids can get 30 mpg".
The pages for Truck, Van, Minivan, Car, and Bus should be referenced. There is little to no reference to hybrid gas-electric in these pages. It really is not part of the definition. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GodWasAnAlien (talk • contribs) .
:Some of the SUV vehicles referenced here can achieve more than 30mpg with petrol engines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.247.186.130 (talk) 21:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested removal of "Hybrid" discussion advertisement 

message: The has been a little to and froing for the first SUV. The article used to say that the 1984 Jeep Cherokee (XJ) was the first but the Range Rover is occasionally brought up as the first. The XJ being unibody has been given as a reason for it being the first (teh Range Rover being body on frame) but I'm not sure this is a deciding factor. Many people count vehicles such as the Land Cruiser or Lexus LX as being SUVs and these are body-on-frame. To my mind, a unibody SUV-like vehicle is more likely to be classed as a crossover SUV. The Jeep Wagoneer (SJ) might also have a claim for being the first SUV.  Stepho  talk 
This paragraph about the "first SUV" is highly subjective, and based on one very-biased person's published book. It neglects many earlier and contemporary SUV-style models, such as the Ford Bronco II and Chevrolet S-10 Blazer, both of which were very similar to the Jeep Cherokee, and were introduced several years before the Jeep Cherokee. Other predecessors include the International Scout, Toyota Landcruiser, numerous Range Rover models, and many other vehicles that didn't survive for a variety of reasons. This paragraph should be removed or rewritten.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 52.129.43.68 (talk) 20:33, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First SUV 

message: True dat. But if SUVs weren't available other cars would have been bought instead, so it's a bit of a silly claim. It's also worth pointing that SUVs were only about 1/3 as much as the biggest contributor. The entire guardian article reads like a child's essay bashing SUVs. Cars have got heavier because every new car buyer wants HVAC and 5* crash and 6 airbags and so on and so forth. Greglocock (talk) 02:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Between 2010 and 2018 SUVs were the second largest contributor to the global increase in carbon emissions worldwide. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved per quick and clear consensus. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sport utility vehicle →  – Per MOS:ACROTITLE: "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject". That is the case here. PhotographyEdits (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 December 2022 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion