lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crypto-fascism

message: The article used to be over 3x as big with a lot more information in it, and since then has been gradually reduced in size to a stub.  Why.  Roidroid (talk) 04:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 'simmer down now' omg skakEL 16:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why has this article been simmered down so much? 

message: as described at the crypto-anarchism article, cryotoanarchism may not be a good 'related'/ see also item. anyone wanna jump in on that? skakEL 16:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  crypto-anarchism  

message: , I removed the link to the Alt Right that you had added. Based on the current Wiki definition for Alt-Right, they come off sounding more like a Nationalist group with racial undertones. I don't see the link between that and this article on fascism.
If there's a link in that Crypto-fascists are prone to be racist, or whatever the Alt-Right is being held accountable for, please provide reference.
Honestly, the term Alt-Right is still very murky and undefined at the moment, it might be best to avoid that article until a definite set of characteristics can be defined.Sawta (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Alt-Right isn't real. They are a boogeyman forced into people's heads, created by controlled opposition. Furthermore the entire premise of "crypto" anything is a symptom of political schizophrenia. No one is afraid to say what they really think, and if they are, they are nothing more than cowards and have no effect on the real world. So why bother with all the sophistry? 206.71.220.106 (talk) 22:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also, alt right removal 

message: In the main text, it is written that Adorno's book Der getreue Korrepetitor (The Faithful Répétiteur) was from "five years earlier" than the debate between Vidal and Buckley which was in 1968. In the footnotes, however, the citation gives the date of 1976 for the book. 50.110.4.82 (talk) 21:05, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The cited book "Gesammelte Schriften in zwanzig Bänden: Band 15: Komposition für den Film. Der getreue Korrepetitor" seems to be reprint and part of a series or part of a collection. An earlier edition seems to be published in 1963, see https://openlibrary.org/books/OL6002502M/Der_getreue_Korrepetitor and https://d-nb.info/450027643 (I do not have this book at hand). This earlier edition fits "five years". I do not know whether 1947 of https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8521208-komposition-f-r-den-film-der-getreue-korrepetitor and https://search.worldcat.org/en/title/504269928 is a typo or not, so the book might be even older. Natsuhata (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in the date given for Adorno's book
Talk:Sandown, New Hampshire

message: sandown new hapshire is an awesome place to live. people can go to jacks sandwhich shop, miller field or just walk to the store, its a quiet peaceful town with Main Street stretching through the whole town of sandown; extending from hampstead through sandown to chester. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.14.202 (talk) 14:15, 13 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Awesome place
Talk:Raised Fist

message: I'm not quite sure if Matte Modin is a _former_ member of Dark Funeral.
The added string: "Swedens longest existing hardcore-platoon."
is taken from a blog entry from the bands myspace site. Again I'm not sure the info is valid can someone confirm this?
: I removed the "longest existing" thing, it's just not correct. Depending on how you define hardcore there's been bands from the early eighties, but Refused should at least be a counter example everyone could agree about. Meaningful Username 13:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matte Modin and the Hardcore-platoon 

message: The article should have some info about their hiatus for a couple of years. Also a more encyclopedic tone would be nice. Meaningful Username 13:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiatus 

message: nu-metal??? please get out of the wikipedia world.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.113.120.25 (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  woot 
Talk:Dimensional Fund Advisors

message: I work for Rubenstein and on behalf of Dimensional Fund Advisors, I'm requesting a rewording of the article's 2nd to last sentence ("The firm sells through...") in addition to the removal of the last sentence, which is unsupported by the existing citations ("Some advisors charge less than 1%..."). 
:The firm works with institutional investors and financial advisors as their products are typically not available to retail investors.
NinaSpezz (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: #  The requested sentences were removed.
#  The proposed sentence additions were not added, as the information on whom the firm works with is already located in paragraph #2 of the article (e.g., "Institutional investors can access Dimensional funds directly or through their consultant. Individual investors can access Dimensional funds through financial professionals, or through their retirement plans (both 401k and defined benefit), or certain 529 college savings plans.")
Regards,  Spintendo  18:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 14-DEC-2018
Talk:Intelligent design movement

message: From the article: "the intelligent design movement is an effort to reshape American society into a theocracy, primarily through education." Hint: the state, according to ID, should posit that there is a God, namely the god of the Christian religion. Not the god of liberal theology, but the god of fundamentalist Christianity. So, it breaches the wall of separation between church and state by a favoring a particular religion against other religions. According to the ID movement, the US public education system should dictate The True Religion™ or The True God™ to the masses, despite Catholics and liberal Protestants who as a rule of thumb find creationism ridiculous in its ambition to pass for a scientific theory. tgeorgescu (talk)  09:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:Educational Technology

message: I am going to merge this page with Educational technology.
I am going to do this immediately, rather than post a merge box, because:
*Educational technology has been re-written and is more developed
*Educational technology has many more pages linking to it. The pages that appear to link to this page, don't actually contain links--the reason for them appears to be associated with the table (Template:Technology) which appears on all of them
*This page has not been significantly edited since original creation
I am not going to merge any of the existing material on this page, because:
*The text is not relevant to the Educational technology page. It is relevant to the Technology Integration page, but will not add anything to that page
*The table (Template:Technology), though good, is also not relevant to the Educational technology page. It is present also on the Technology page--Educational technology links to the Technology page
Alan Pascoe 20:55, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Educational technology 

message: Right, just so y'all know, da merge from da article <EdTech> is back ON. Este motor está endemoniado. Broomie, broom. FeatherPluma (talk) 19:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Long time, no talk
Talk:Alluvium

message: Is alluvium a synonym to sediment? /Habj 15:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Alluvium is a type of sediment, usually the gravel, silt, etc deposited by a river along its floodplain. Sediment is a more general term that would include alluvium. Vsmith 17:34, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: I think that the definition an explanation of these two terms needs to differ, either by saying 1)fluvial is from perenial rivers, alluvial is not (or at least, not controlled by river sedimentary processes 100% of the time) or 2) fluvial as a subset of alluvial sediments, alluvial being any unconsolidated sediments, fluvial being only from rivers.  It is my opinion that the alluvial definition is the one that needs to change.--Qfl247 (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alluvial vs. Fluvial

message: Right now, this article seems to fall afoul of wp:NOTDICT. That said, Susan Mayhew's A Dictionary of Geography p.18 seems to be helpful, including providing cites to a number of relevant sources. LeadSongDog come howl! 17:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Need an article

message: Ggy 103.167.127.158 (talk) 01:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alluvial
Talk:Cent(e)ring diphthong

message: This article should be renamed to centring diphthong, because the majority of non-rhotic dialects use these diphthongs. Non-rhotic dialects are: southern England, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and New England. And the majority of these dialects use BE spelling. -- Mark 03:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Boston accent also uses centering diphthongs and they use American spelling. So, I vote to stick with centering diphthong. Centering diphthongs can also exist in rhotic accents though, for example, many Northeastern U.S. accents have /e@/ in fast, can't, dance, mad etc. in contrast to the /{/ in lad, cat etc.
But they (Bostonians) are the minority not the majority as I stated above and so this article should be renamed. They (NE US) are also the minority, if in fact they actually use any centring diphthongs. Also please sign your name. -- Mark 03:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Meseret Defar

message: Are we attempting to merge an article that doesn't exist into this one? I only got a redlink Footer Olympic Champions 3000 m Women Any editors views on this? If not, I'll remove the merge tag, thanks xCentaur |  talk   10:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Would be nice to have a list of world records -- is she still the only woman to ever break 9:00 on 2miles or 3200m?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suahi (talk • contribs) 11:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a List of world records in athletics but 2 miles and 3200 are not distances that the official world body IAAF keeps records for, therefore any records for those distances would be unofficial.Trackinfo (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: WR

message: Someone inserted a suggestion that this article would be better in prose.  I can't see how that would improve this article in the least and I removed that.Trackinfo (talk) 05:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prose

message: How did she pass her Life 196.188.243.190 (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meseret defar
Talk:All-female band

message: * The article, though it provides a brief discussion, says way too little about the female rock bands of the 60s--the all-time heyday for female rock bands (in terms of numbers of groups).  It mentions only a few bands.  Some of the better known groups, such as The Luv'd Ones, The Liverbirds, The Continental Co-ets,The Shaggs, The Moppets, The Fatimas, The Mod 4, and The She's are not mentioned.  I am not advocating that all of the bands on that website be mentioned here (this is a summary--space would not allow), but that there could be more said, about the breadth and scope of the 60s female rock band phenominon.  The period warrants far more discussion than is given.  Wording such as "proliferation," and/or "phenominon" would be accurate and appropriate descriptions for the female bands of this era (1963-1967).  The article makes it look as if there were only a handful of 60s girl bands, when there were never more than at that time.   
* The article makes it look as if there were more female rock bands in the 70s and 80s, which is not even remotely true.  The statement about bands "springing up" after Ebert's remarks is misleading.  While a few probably did spring up after that, they were not nearly enough to fill all of the boots (made for walkin') by the 60s girl bands--not even close.  Keep in mind that the 60s girl band phenominon had already lost steam after 1967, with the demise of the garage rock phenominon, so any bounce from Ebert's remarks would be a step back up.  
* By the way, most of these bands were part of the Garage Rock phenominon. But, the article makes no mention of that, when it is essential knowlege.  That should be mentioned. Garagepunk66 (talk) 04:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more discussion of 60s female rock bands; statement about post-Ebert proliferation misleading; should mention garage rock;  

message: Why is there no section for all-female bands from this century? I would think that that would be the most important information this article could offer, but there’s no mention of them at all... VictimOfEntropy (talk) 02:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000s and 2010s
Talk:List of CPU sockets

message: merge request:
* List of AMD CPU slots and sockets
* List of Intel CPU slots and sockets
This page is ordered by date, and those two are by CPU family. I can see reasons for both orderings, though of course once they are grouped by family that's sort of got the age there too if you order the CPUs from old to new. -- Tarquin 15:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Does the Pentium M Dual-Core use Socket 480? According to the Socket 479 Article, all Pentium M's use it, as well as the Intel Core microprocessors using a modified version. Not sure, so I won't delete, but if anyone is, can they please fix it? QuantumCypher 11:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socket 480 

message: If you look at the CPU Sockets page, it seems most of the important info from this article is there.  Should this page be deleted, or should more info be put into the other article? Geekosaurus 17:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of the page
Talk:Ridick

message: I'm not quite sure why this page is a candidate for deletion? There are other words in wikipedia that are slang or vernacular. Especially shortened forms of another word.
Firstly, "Wikipedia is not a dictionary". All you can say about this word is that it is a shortened form of 'ridiculous'. As such it belongs in Wiktionary. Secondly it's very doubtful that it's got anything like widespread usage. When I googled the word, almost all the usages were foreign or misspellings of Riddick. Hence the redirect. DJ Clayworth 15:55, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Samsø Højskole

message: This article doesn't go much of the way to describing how or why this school is notable. Weight loss centres are everywhere. With the schools web site not being in English either, I've got little hope of improving the article myself as English is my only language. 
I don't see the value in a 2 line entry about a school in an English encyclopedia, linking to a non-english web site. Is this an article only Danish speaking people can now update based on the source material? -- Longhair | Talk 15:59, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:See No Evil (2006 film)

message: Does nayone know if see no evil is coming to the uk on dvd? Black6989 09:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UK

message: Just glancing over the trivia section. Was wondering if this was vandalism or not:
:At the end of the movie after about 30 seconds into the credits a scene showing Jacob dead and with a hole where his eye was a dog comes over and pees in his eye socket. During the commentary on the DVD Kane said, (jokingly) that when he finds this dog he's going to do something bad to it.
If it isn't, however, I have to say that it's wording is ridiculous and needs to be fixed. Otherwise I'm going to remove it. 67.142.130.44 15:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: What kind of plot is that, there is heaps more in the movie then that. Ill be happy to change it to a REAL plot if someone gives me the ok. --Metal to the Max! 23:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do it. The plot section here is out of control and probably too long. Tripnoted (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: plot
Talk:Velar consonant

message: Found an even better example of a freak language without velars than Xavante. Check it out: Vanimo :D
--Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 18:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velarlessness 

message: The article about velarization needs some help, and I think the best way to help it would be to merge it with this article.  Its contents are pretty technical, and the technical information seems as if it would have a better home here. --Roman à clef (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not just expand on the velarization article?  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 22:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly agree that the two should be merged. After five years of existence, the total progress on the velarization article is a tiny amount of information and citations to the same authors.  It would, however, make an excellent subsection of Velar consonant. Guy Macon (talk) 23:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Velarized (secondary articulation) is not velar (primary articulation). I agree the article doesn't include much (and indeed is unlikely to ever reach similar length as palatalization), but a better merge site might be secondary articulation, itself also a fairly short article. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 20:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable.  I struck my comments above.  I think it should be merged with something, but I don't have enough background knowledge to have an informed opinion as to what should be merged with what. Guy Macon (talk) 00:08, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Making it a section in secondary articulation would work nicely.  If it gets as expanded as palatalization, it can easily become an article again.  We might also consider whether we want to do the same with pharyngealization. — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 02:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: The passage
:Of course, [ɡ] does not occur in languages that lack voiced stops, like Mandarin Chinese
was inserted by  on 29 October 2008. This puzzles me because I think g, d, b are all common in Mandarin. Our article Mandarin Chinese#Initials bears this out. Loraof (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinyin has the graphemes (basically letters) , <d>, <g>, but Mandarin does not have the sounds [b] (as in bed), [d] (as in dad), and [g] (as in get) as distinct from [p] (as in sped), [t] (as in still), and [k] (as in skill). Mandarin, on the other hand distinguishes [pʰ] (as in pin), [tʰ] (as in top), and [kʰ] (as in can or kill) from [p], [t], and [k]. --JorisvS (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, my claim was not very accurate. [g] occurs as an allophone of /k/ in atonic syllables. Saying /g/ does not occur is meaningless, since phonemes are only defined within a language where they occur, so I don't know how to reword. — kwami (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  No voiced stops in Mandarin?
Talk:List of video games based on anime or manga

message: Can we decide on a consistent format for this list? Some of the issues I see:
*Some series (e.g. Bishoujo Senshi Sailor Moon) have multiple releases on the same console, but only the console name is listed
*A few entries have "Japan only", even though that's true for the majority of the list
*Most titles are listed by the series name, others by the game name
Let's clear this up!Londonbeat41692 (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, what should we do with titles developed for simultaneous release, such as D Cide Traumerei?Londonbeat41692 (talk) 03:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency

message: I think this list should be merged with List of video games based on cartoons. There is no inherent difference besides the region of origin, and I think that the current title is confusing some Western people into adding games that look like what they think "anime" is that are actually unrelated. Merging may reduce this confusion. Separating only one country of origin from all the others is also a bit odd (seeing as there are no separate pages for things from other countries). Londonbeat41692 (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Category talk:Parliamentary constituencies in South East England

message: South-east of what? Yes, I know, but will everyone? I'm not sure this category is well-named. Naturenet 16:32, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I totally agree! UkPaolo 18:43, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see why it is necessary. The attempt to force regions on the British people failed. The category has no basis in the Parliamentary system and should be deleted. AshbyJnr 20:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Morton (American politician)

message: I removed 6 paragraphs that was word-for-word the same as is found on this website. As far as my opinion on the rest of the article, the tidbit about Swedish/Finnish ancestry is interesting, but it doesn't warrant three paragraphs. A simple link or two will suffice. John Morton isn't what I would term an important Founding Father. Sure, his vote turned out to be the deciding vote in favor of independence, but that is basically it. So, I'll delete the rest of the biography section. --Sparkhurst 07:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not important 

message: We now have two different burial sites given. Which is it? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Burial confusion
Talk:Vejle

message: Translated from Danish Wikipedia article and merged with existing English Wikipedia article. Vejlenser (talk) 06:02, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Arnold R. Beverley

message: This article should probably be deleted, right ?
I think it should stay as a stub of sorts, but the line, "Furthermore, it is common in high-profile murder cases for false confessions to be made to police." is only relevant in as much as the author wants to imply that Arnold Beverly is making a false confession.  I don't think that's objective.
*The Free Mumia campaign has made a big deal of the Beverley confession, and that has meant it has been well publicised worldwide, possibly gaining it enough notability for Wikipedia. I'd suggest a readirect to the Mumia Abu-Jamal article, but with the heated POV-warring and vandalism over there, there's no guarantee that a mention of Beverley will actually be in the article on any given day of the week. --Aim Here 08:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Philip of Poitou

message: I think the article should make clear mention of the setting (Britain).
: England, more precisely, though it's quite possible he himself was French. But I don't think it's critical; the first sentence mentions Durham and Canterbury in the first sentence, which is pretty much guaranteed to place it, and the date means there's no risk of confusion with Durham, NC. Shimgray 17:21, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Britain
Talk:Minnewaska State Park Preserve

message: I added a redirect here from Lake Minnewaska (hence the boldface) as well as a referene from Minnewaska.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.216.68.28 (talk • contribs) 
POV
"In March 2006, an additional 2,500 acres were added to the Preserve as a result of action by a citizen's conservation group."
This comment covers up the fact that this supposed citizen's conservation group's actions were an attempt to build condos on land they said they were trying to preserve in a natural state.  The state then siezed the land in order to actually make it into a preserve.
----
No, your facts are mainly wrong. You are right that the wording gives a little too much credit to the citizen's conservation group. I've fixed that.
But you seem to be confusing that group (really more than one group) with a real estate partnership that planned to develop the property. 
Here is a reasonably accurate account of what happened:
Calamitybrook (talk) 19:46, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Am tempted to propose removal of swimming section. There are many forms of recreation that are banned or severely regulated in park. Why is swimming especially significant? I'll probably leave it and maybe add section on the regulators' severely restrictive "Master Plan" of 2009.
Calamitybrook (talk) 00:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled