lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sin of omission

message: I just added a  tag to this sentence:
"A person may be guilty of a sin of omission by failing to do something which he is able to do and which he ought to do, by reason of a cause for which he is entirely responsible, as when a person knows that drinking to drunkness will incapacitate him, and yet drinks." What exactly is the point being made here? That a person commits a sin if he drinks to excess with foreknowledge that it will prevent him from doing something he ought to, or that to avoid sin a person should never knowingly incapacitate himself in such a manner just in case he may be required to help another? On first reading I thought it might be meant to imply that drunkenness itself is a sin, but of course that would make no sense because if that were the case then the sin would be one of commission not omission. Can the author of the above sentence or someone else who knows what it's getting at please clarify? Contains Mild Peril (talk) 15:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone please clarify this? 

message: We need to find reliable sources for both of those quotes.  The MLK one is well knows, but stills needs a source.  But Dracano?  Google Search shows nothing serious for that name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinarpe (talk • contribs) 10:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Dracano Sapien? 

message: There is no mention of Leviticus 5:1.  Should there be?
"When he has heard a public imprecation and - although able to testify as one who has either seen or learned of the matter - he does not give information, so that he is subject to punishment."72.214.242.143 (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In principle, not a bad thought, but what is needed is someone else discussing this (and not us doing WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH about biblical texts. 2601:246:C700:558:E8D7:8CA7:35D3:40B6 (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leviticus 

message: This article was moved, so that it would no longer be a Catholicism-only article (which was a correct choice, as theologically, it is broader than just Catholic). But, in followup to that move, no work was done to broaden it. I call on WikiProject Christianity to begin to address this. 2601:246:C700:558:E8D7:8CA7:35D3:40B6 (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Follow-up done. Veverve (talk) 22:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for followthrough for earlier move
Talk:Power harassment

message: This discussion is taking place at Talk:Abuse of power. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Abuse of power]] 

message: The discussion was clearly against a merge. Since the merge request is far past any timeline I am going to remove the templates.  Otr500 (talk) 06:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Consensus
Talk:Shared Interest

message: Strengths include:
* reasonable level of neutrality ... while it is obvious insiders have written some of it, the promotional nature has been dramatically toned down
* a clear diagram of the role of Shared Interest in the business of the fair trade companies it finances, 
* a succinct but useful summary of what Shared Interest is, how it is organized, and how it came about, and 
* a good text box with various fair trade links at the bottom.  
Weaknesses include:
* not enough citations
* no review of current debates around the role of Shared Interest and companies like it in development
* no note of any failures or problems in the growth and development of the business model (tensions or conflicts within the stakeholder base, etc.)
* no note of the lessons of experience from Shared Interest (some fair trade sectors are more readily financed than others, etc.)
* very limited sense of its operating scale (current capitalization, typical annual profit, number of employees, etc.)
* virtually no sense of its outreach (no. of fair trade companies it is financing, where they are, what types of good they are selling, what markets they are selling to, etc.)
There's a great start here ... I hope it can be carried a lot further!Brett epic (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strengths and Weaknesses
Talk:Symphony No. 1 The Lord of the Rings

message: *Removed them for obvious reasons - the page has 2 references now, and the page is coded as mid-level importance in the Middle-earth WikiProject. Further expansion must be done to get it out of stub status, however. --Exodio (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Unreferenced and Notability tags
Talk:Wick's theorem

message: This article was started by copying from S matrix. RJFJR 13:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Personally, I find the notation used in this article hard to read.
Contractions are denoted by dot superscripts. Is this notation used in the literature? I have not seen it. I would strongly prefer reading contractions with lines joining the operators instead, but this seems hard to achieve with the limited LaTeX features in the Wikipedia math editor.
Normal ordering is denoted by colons. This notation I have seen before, but I think it is hard to read when the colons are mixed with the dot notation for contractions, \dots and \cdots and so on - there are so many dots close together that makes things hard to read.
What do others feel about this?
My suggestion:
* Try to find a way to write contractions in the limited LaTeX editor with lines joining the operators. Something close to \overline{ \overset{|}{A} \overset{|}{B} } or \overset{\sqcap}{\hat{A}\hat{B}}, but preferably even better, instead of A^\bullet B^\bullet.
* Write normal ordering with N \{ \cdots \} instead of : \cdots :.
* Write time ordering with T \{ \cdots \}, consistent with normal ordering.
Hersle (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that an improvement of notation is needed. The expression \hat{A}^\bullet \hat{B}^{\bullet\bullet} \hat{C}^{\bullet\bullet} \hat{D}^\bullet is very confusing in my opinion and possibly also ambiguous... Can anyone explain how this expression should be interpreted? —Kri (talk) 16:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

text: "Is this notation used in the literature? I have not seen it", this is the notation of Wick's 1950 paper. While arguably not the best notation, it is not ambiguous, and it certainly does not lack precedent. 2601:19B:B00:87A0:DC82:73CD:965F:2B24 (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement of notation? 

message: It is impossible to understand for me why we do this. Now we have a bunch of contractions on the right side of the equation. What else can I do with the contractions to make this useful? The examples show how to use the theorem, but not really what's useful about it.
From the german entry I understand that the normal ordered products will just give 0, thus they can be taken out? There is then also some confusion about the use of normal ordering here? Why are the contracted products within the normal ordering colons in the examples? 2001:16B8:2CDB:A200:6F:9531:E0EB:35BA (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Talk:Hampshire Premier League

message: Does anyone have any clue in what league the Hampshire Premier Football League feeds into. Is there a relegation system from this league? --Siva1979Talk to me 14:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotion and relegation for Hampshire Premier Football League 
Talk:Tom Kapinos

message: Seems so slide his political beliefs aka misinformation into episodes which can make what was an entertaining episode a tasteless 
andtacky Tigger for those who appreciate the the truth and not just some woke conspiracy theory.
When he does this, rather then be left with  feeling good by having us a have critical thought and seeing things (the ever contradictive Bible, God etc.) from a new perspective instead leaves a sour and uncomfortable taste in ones mouth 2601:245:4400:7320:B57A:788A:734D:FCA1 (talk) 01:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Kapinos Maker of Lucifer
Talk:Berl Repetur

message: The Knesset website says that his name is Beryl Raptor, which makes a lot of sense. Do you have a source saying that his name in English is Berl Repetur (or similar)? -- Ynhockey (Talk) 14:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Beryl is a woman's name, whilst Berl (e.g. Berl Katznelson) seems to be for men. The MFA's Declaration of Independence page states his name to be Berl Repetur, and ghits are 7 v 713 for Beryl Raptor vs Berl Repetur. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  With a short delay of 11+ years I was able to get the Knesset site to correct the mistake. It doesn't seem like they checked though, I could've told them it was Berl Rapatore or whatever. Oh well. —Ynhockey (Talk) 08:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Büchi automaton

message: You have written:
 
 you may want to specify a property such as "for every request, an acknowledge eventually follows", or its negation "there is a request which is not followed by an acknowledge". The latter is a property of infinite words: you cannot say of a finite sequence that it satisfies this property.
I don't understand the exact meaning of the latter sentence.
For what I understand, I cannot agree on these phrases. First of all, the two formulas are not one the negation of the other. In particular, "eventually follows" cannot become "not followed by" under negation. I understand this is informal: you do not provide the definition of "eventually" and of the rest. Anyway, either you intend "follows" in one or more "steps" (thus you do not need eventually in the first property) or you intend "follows" in exactly one step (thus, you need something like "never" in the second property). Consider this example (t stands for think, r stands for request, a stands for acknowledge):
s1: trttat
s2: trtttt
s1 and s2 above are two finite sequences. The first formula holds for s1 and the second formula holds for s2.
You need to specify better what is the language (logic) in which you express the formulas and their semantics.
I would suggest to refer to this article about temporal logic.
--Valerios (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Topics 

message: What is the proper way to pronounce the name "Büchi "?
B/œ/chi see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_phonology Soathana 15:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wrong: the pronounciation is B/y/chi, with a Close front rounded vowel, similar as in the plural form of the German word "das Buch": "Die Bücher" (mp3). (I am a native speaker of German.) 84.58.232.143 (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Most of the articles are written without latex. Please don't change it (Ashutosh Gupta (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: No Latex please
Talk:Severan Tondo

message: How was this painting found?  What kind of place did they find it in? Keraunos (talk) 02:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Some sort of ancient rubbish dump in Egypt, I think. It seems to have been essentially discarded when the next emperor came along. Johnbod (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:KASU

message: kasu means in tamil money meaning  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.200.142.75 (talk) 13:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ice Hockey Journalists UK

message: The company Conicity Technologies (conicity.com/edgehone) has developed technology that significantly reduces the ability of the skate blade to cut flesh. It is in use in the US NCAA groups as well as with Team USA Men's Olympic Team. We have been trying since 2016 to get the NHL and others in the USA to listen and to evaluate the technology and we are not getting through to the right people. I am reaching out to you today in hopes that you can help us. The accident happened in the UK, and neck guards are being made mandatory. This process the razor sharp edges that create the cutting hazard.  Please help us get the word out. We are located in Pittsburgh, PA, perhaps you could pass the message on to an AP source that is local to Pittsburgh. 2603:301F:1544:8000:6820:597E:2F7B:9CB9 (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hockey Blade Laceration Issues
Talk:KFPW (AM)

message: Station format says News/talk, but Home page link points to (obsolete) TimelessClassics syndicator web site.  No information is better than wrong information.  I suggest the Radio Project team stop creating all these content-free 2 sentence web pages based on Arbitron's database or whatever inaccurate 3rd party source is being copied without verfifying the information first.  This page was created yesterday and that link has been obsolete for months.StreamingRadioGuide 18:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Gallo

message: As a tony award winner this entry should stay and not be speedily deleted. --cda 14:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Please note:
* Editors proposing to write about themselves are strongly advised not to edit or create such articles at all (except other than to correct unambiguous errors of fact) but to instead use the talk page to request help from neutral editors. 
--Malcolmxl5 03:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography
Talk:Resistive touchscreen

message: The page mentions "the aforementioned vectoring issues."  It is not clear what "vectoring" is, but it certainly isn't mentioned previously...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.118.143 (talk) 18:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

message: Merging sounds good -- they are identical pages. How do we do it?--Gnu-gnome 14:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: The Link to Microdots is very misleading. It has nothing to do with a Resistive touchscreen.
Even on the "Microdot (disambiguation)" page is no reference to a Resistive touchscreen.
I think this link should be removed. (194.0.198.144 (talk) 07:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microdots? 

message: I'm pretty sure i read somewhere it's possible to make multitouch resistive screens, why no mention of it here? --TiagoTiago (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about multitouch? 

message: D 197.250.225.215 (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resistive touchscreen
Talk:Horse-Shoe Trail

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Brandywine Trail and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Brandywine Trail until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  03:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brandywine Trail" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mont Clare, Pennsylvania

message: http://www.phoenixvillenews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110702/TMP06/307029958&template=printart
Newspaper article on history of Mont Clare citing Wikipedia.  Parking this here because at the end of the article it mentions the Navy being called in to settle a dispute between the canal boat men and the shad fishers at Mont Clare, which isn't in the Wikipedia article (yet!).  Attempting to find out more before adding it. --J Clear (talk) 02:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Navy and Mont Clare
Talk:Mount Nittany Medical Center

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pennsylvania's 15th congressional district

message: The text in this article is basically generalized common knowledge, but even in that, it's not accurate. For example, Allentown and Bethlehem are not "fairly large cities", Bush and Kerry didn't visit here with any "regularity", and calling the district "heavily contested" hardly reflects most elections since WW II. As for "politically important nationally", that's local puffery. All potential swing districts have their importance, but there's nothing to suggest the eyes of the nation have been on the 15th. Meanwhile, neither the history nor the current state of affairs are addressed, for example, the swing in registration that's taken place since the decline of heavy manufacturing in the late 1970s or the effects of redistricting, an omission that renders the article not only out of date but irrelevant to anyone who comes here hoping to learn something about their district. Digging up some sources would help immeasurably. Allreet (talk) 02:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like you know the area pretty well.  We look forward to your contributions. Npeters22 (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for improvement 

message: The 15th District has gained much territory in the Congressional redistricting based on the 2010 U.S. Census.  It now reaches all the way from Three Mile Island in Dauphin County all the way to Williams Twp., Northampton County, over 100 miles from west to east.  See the official Commonwealth of Pennsylvania redistricting page. Bill S. (talk) 03:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated map
Talk:Pennsylvania House of Representatives, District 60

message: Pennsylvania is way behind in this Country for the Law Enforcement tool of RADAR and LIDAR.
The Legislature should make this bill into Law asap. 2601:544:8180:5C0:8CD9:3120:AC89:6B00 (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  HB606
Talk:Pennsylvania's 6th congressional district

message: The maps here are wrong and don't reflect the 2011 redistricting:  jesup (talk) 22:57, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the wiki page, Biden won the district in its current form by a narrow 1.2 points. However, Clinton in 2016 carried the district by over 9 points, and Biden actually carried the district by 17 points. Could this wiki page be updated to reflect the actual percentage?
Source: https://mobile.twitter.com/MassJumbo/status/1360346099702067202 Muhibm0307 (talk) 02:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a reliable source. -- Scjessey (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biden’s Margin of Victory in this District
Talk:Reading Eagle

message: The Reading Eagle no longer carries Opus... they cut it out a year or more ago. 68.44.141.207 (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  Fixed. Rick Norwood (talk) 20:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opus 

message: Should comics be listed on all the newspapers? CuboneKing (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a big fan of comics, but I think not, now that comics are widely available on the web, just for the few newspapers that still have a large comics section.Rick Norwood (talk) 14:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, there's no need to include this for all papers.  I am amused that this one has it (I cite this paper often when sourcing other articles because its in google new archive, which picks up many wire service national stories which the Eagle carried), but I didn't have the heart to remove it (plus the paper is claimed to be notable for its comic section size).--Milowent (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comics
Talk:Thomas Algeo Rowley

message: Rowley was assigned only a district command in western Pennsylvania, due to the on going feud between the army commander General George G. Meade and the now corps commander General G. K. Warren.
:Not clear what this feud had to do with Rowley. Valetude (talk) 15:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify, please
Talk:Daily Local News

message: Greetings.  I hereby declare myself to have an Inherent Conflict Of Interest regarding this article.  I contributed to the creation of this article, and would like to continue to help edit it to meet Wikipedia notability and quality standards.  I welcome all comments on how to improve this article.       Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)      23:02, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Daily Local News article 
Talk:The York Dispatch

message: Hello, first off --- I'm totally new to this, please forgive any mistakes in tone and styling -- especially to this talk-page! Now on to the changes I made here ...
Added links and details referring to The York Dispatch's secondary websites. These are common additions made to many entries on newspapers. Best, Skiprock --Skiprock (talk) 13:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website updates
Category talk:Wikipedia articles needing page number citations

message: Would anyone object if I created a specialised sub-cat of this category for references to the London Gazette (also including Edinburgh Gazette and Belfast Gazette).  They've recently changed their website breaking all the old urls, and in the process changing from their web references just numbering pages within issues, to match the printed copies, where page numbering runs throughout the year, starting with page 1 in the first issue of each, and continuing regardless of issue.  I'm planning to ask for a bot to be created to assist in managing sorting this out, and it would be useful to be able to place them into a specific sub-category.  David Underdown 14:54, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialised sub-cat for London Gazette
Talk:Carrie Furnace

message: Can you really ignore this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.250.93 (talk) 02:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive deer head 

message: What source do we have for the Carnegie site purchase date? Who owned it during the strike? He controlled it at the time. 75.165.66.150 (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carnegie site purchase date
Talk:Margaret Esherick House

message: I just posted a major expansion of this article.  I included everything from the original article with these exceptions:
* I removed all material relating to Galen Schlosser per Talk:Galen_Schlosser. 
* I removed the link to the Greatbuildings.com page on the Esherick House because it mistakenly mixes photos of Kahn's Esherick (white stucco exterior) and Norman Fisher houses (all-wood exterior).  This expanded article probably has more than enough external links to photos anyway.
* I used three of the four photos from the original article as illustrations for the text in the expanded version. I did not use the photo of the garage because it is not mentioned in any of books and essays that describe the Esherick House.  Bilpen (talk) 19:53, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major expansion 

message: To add location map go to building's page at Wikidata. ovA_165443 (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Template:Infobox building
Talk:Forty Fort

message: American participants at the Battle of Wyoming were militia with a small contingent of Continentals. The Americans had no indigenous allies present. The "British" force consisted of soldiers from Butler's Rangers and mostly Seneca and Cayuga warriors. Butler's Rangers were a British provincial unit recruited from Loyalists. The paragraph about the Battle of Wyoming has been revised and expanded. Griffin's Sword (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Wyoming