lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hip flask

message: The first part of this article explains that hip flasks appeared in the 18th Century, yet an insertion at the end of the article comments that the hip flask was invented in  the 1920.  These two facts appear to be conflicting.  Can anybody rectify this situation?
"The hip flask began to appear in the form recognised today in the 18th century, initially used by members of the gentry."
"The Whiskey or Hip Flask was invented by Osmond Jamouneau, in the early 1920s during prohibition."
:Well, there isn't anything to be found on Google for "hip flask Osmond Jamouneau". However, this museum has one from 1890, and I came accross several commercial websites selling hip flasks from pre-1920, so that comment seems to be untrue - after all, one of the external links in the reference section claims that the sale of hipflasks was prohibited during that time. I was quite surprised at the lack on information about them on the internet, though. Bob talk 21:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Information 

message: Perhaps somebody could add a discussion about legality. It is illegal to carry or drive with a hip flask in any state with an open contain law or drunk driving law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.248.142 (talk) 05:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be an endless list.  By 'state' do you mean sovereign state or US state?  A list for all would be very long and listing each US state would make the article too US-centric.  The rest of the world don't really care about particular laws in the state of Texas or the state of Redneck, USA.--217.71.44.213 (talk) 21:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality of carrying hip flasks 

message: Is the section on "Engraving" really necessary? It sites nothing and only has a the opinion of a comedic magazine on alcohol saying how it's a great gift. And do people actually give out engraved flasks anymore? I say we remove the section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxGame5o (talk • contribs) 01:13, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing of the "Engraving" section 

message: Strange that in some US states it is illegal to carry a hip flask but legal to carry a handgun.PC 5002 (talk) 18:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Around 88,000 people die of alcohol-related deaths in the United States every year, which is more than twice the amount of people killed by firearms. Furthermore a subset of those firearm deaths would be alcohol-related, so it makes sense that there would be stronger prohibitions on alcohol. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality.
Talk:Baron Suffield

message: I'm not certain of the heirs. I've taken the heir from [] but this can't confirm 100% that the son is paternal and born in wedlock though I suspect it would have been commented on it it had not been.Any one able to confim those details? Alci12 17:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the name of Harry Harbord-Hamond from the page. I believe the next in line to the titles is the heir apparent's brother Hon. John Edward Richard Harbord-Hamond (b. 1956). Tryde 20:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose merging John Harbord, 8th Baron Suffield into Baron Suffield. Most of the content of John Harbord, 8th Baron Suffield is genealogical information which would inherently be covered in Baron Suffield already. John Harbord, 8th Baron Suffield has a void of substantive biographical information about John Harbord's own life and is poorly sourced, the only cited source being a page from cracroftspeerage.co.uk, which is a deprecated self-published peerage website. The most prominent section of John Harbord, 8th Baron Suffield is his coat of arms, which already appears here in Baron Suffield and thus would not need to be repeated in a merge. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merger as described.  Joyous! | Talk 05:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There was some significant opposition to the merger at Talk:John Harbord, 8th Baron Suffield, so I'm not going to proceed with it for now. But the problems with the article remain. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Template talk:Bibb County, Georgia schools

message: I reverted the change from Hutchings High School to Hutchings Career Center. The name was changed in 2005; see http://www.bibb.k12.ga.us/careercenter/default.htm . --SuperNova |T|C| 18:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, the original was "High School", was changed to "Career Center", then I reverted it back to "HS". --SuperNova |T|C| 18:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wish Bibb County would make up their mind on a name already... oy.... Matt F 22:40, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hutchings name
Talk:Vial

message: *Wiktionary already has a page :wikt:vial. Some sort of Wikipedia page is needed for vial because 9 other Wikipedia pages have links to it. Anthony Appleyard 05:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 13:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: * 28 pages (not counting user pages and talk pages) now point to Vial, so some sort of page is needed here. Anthony Appleyard 15:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please keep this page

message: I removed the  tag because I've added some sources. They may not be the best but I think they are reliable. From this sources I've added information into the article as a start of improvement. Gathering information seems not the problem but building this information into a good article is the real task. Whoever has good writing abilities should feel free to improve. Bisco 08:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources, improvement
Talk:Radio Tay

message: This article should not contain schedule and other advertising material! --Friedfish 06:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a policy stating as much? - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 11:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Rice–Eccles Stadium

message: It may be that Rice-Eccles Stadium is not a complete new build, and if this is the case then this article should be merged with the Rice Stadium (Utah) articleRockford1963 (talk) 22:04, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely new build stadium? 

message: I think that the attendance records should be capped at 15 or maybe even 10 games. 17 seems really arbitrary. Thoughts? UteFan16 (talk) 23:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think 10 is a good number. Right now, that would mean all crowds would be 45.5 k or higher. The top 15 are listed on the Rice–Eccles Stadium webpage. So after the season is over, the University of Utah updates the page, but the wikipedia community updates it immediately with any new records. That's how we ended up with 17. But I think 10 makes more sense. —Ute in DC (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance records 

message: Why does the title use an ndash instead of a hyphen? When two last names are combined it's usually done with a hyphen. Thatotherperson (talk/contribs) 19:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A Google search of "rice eccles" shows almost every site using a hyphen, which I'm pretty sure is the proper English way of spelling it. I'm going to update the article to use hyphens instead of ndashes if no one can provide a reliable source that uses an ndash.Thatotherperson (talk/contribs) 14:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing if anyone was going to comment on the matter they would have done so by now, so I'll just go ahead and do it. Thatotherperson (talk/contribs) 13:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rice&ndash;Eccles or Rice-Eccles? 
Talk:The Super (1991 film)

message: Wasn't basketball a big part of the plot? ItsRainingCatsAndDogsAndMen (talk) 13:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basketball
Talk:Bay Trail (Australia)

message: I've tried to keep this article factual, informative and not sound too much like a tourist brochure (particularly the Navigation section)!  I hope it's useful.
As a regular user of the trail I'd be glad to see more added to the article, particularly anything about the trail's history.  My earliest recollections of it are the Mordialloc to Chelsea gravel section, known to myself and the rest of the local kids back in the mid-1980s as the "back track".  This was before the suburb of Aspendale Gardens existed.  I don't know how long that section of the  trail existed before then.
It's only relatively recently that the entire Bayside trail has (mostly) joined to form one long section.  The section between Middle Brighton Pier and Sandown Street is the most recent piece in the jigsaw puzzle... --ozzmosis 18:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I was pondering the thought of renaming this to Bay Trail at some stage, as I suppose that is its "official" name.  Looks like Lakeyboy did it for me.  Bit of a shame the move/rename lost all the edit history... --ozzmosis (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: renamed from Bayside Trail
Talk:Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim

message: The entry Glein, Ludwig in Nuttalls Encyclopaedia is definitively wrong. Gerhard51 18:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My copy of the of the 1907 Nuttall from Gutenburg reports:  “Glein, Ludwig, German lyric poet, known as Father Glein for the encouragement he gave to young German authors; composed war songs for the Prussian army (1719-1803).” It misspells the last name (all the other languages of Wikipedia use "Gleim"), and it doesn't add anything past 1911 Britannica, so I removed it from the list of references. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:48, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Baron Braybrooke

message: The present baron has 10 daughters (?) but I can't clearly see an immediate heir. There are a good number of heirs male of the 2nd baron but I can't find anything in between though they probably existAlci12 18:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lysgårdsbakken

message: Could there be a link from this page to the ski jumping results from that area? I missed the results of today's jump and I thought that the page of lillehammer may have it but it more describes the jumping place rather than the results. A link to the results would be useful. 2A02:8388:1601:800:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 19:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ski jumping results 
Talk:Lake Placid Equestrian Stadium

message: Hi to all the Wikipedia´s user around the world. 
I wish to share this information: In this web site []
its creator CdnJane share your experience during the 1980 Winter Olympics and shows many photos especcially the Lake Placid Equestrian Stadium venue of the opening and closure ceremonies as seen during the event.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bicko2008 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bergisel

message: Let me cite WP:TITLE: By the design of Wikipedia's software, an article can only have one title. When this title is a name, significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the article, usually in the first sentence or paragraph. Sorry, but I strongly doubt, that the Italian form Monte Isel with its 53 Google Books hits has a significant diffusion. In fact, even in Italian Bergisel is clearly more common. Given that the mountain is in Austria I see no reason to include the second mostly used Italian name, particularly since it is explained in the etymology section that it roots in a misunderstanding...  --Mai-Sachme (talk) 09:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names in other languages
Talk:Stade Lesdiguières

message: Hello.
I am living in Grenoble and I could confirm the opening ceremony was not at Lesdiguieres, but at a temporary stadium that does no more exist today.
If you want more details, do not hesitate to post a comment (even in English) on the French page (where the reference to the Olympic games was removed at August 26th 2008) 15.195.201.86 (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used during Olympic games ?
Talk:Captain Crook

message: Deleted article per merge discussion at Talk:McDonaldland
Jeremy (Jerem43 17:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kent Ravens

message: I'm not sure it's accurate to describe a team in Greenwich borough as the first RLC club in Kent, since Greenwich Admirals are just as much Kent. In my opinion they're 2nd to Greenwich, although on another basis Broadstairs are first. Sorry to be petty, I just think it needs pointing out.80.176.144.237 18:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tru64 UNIX

message: What was the codebase used for OSF/1? Was it SVR3, BSD, some mixture? The article says:
:After the OSF gave up on OSF/1, DEC renamed OSF/1 AXP to Digital UNIX and made it the main operating system for the company's Alpha processors. It was 64-bit and retained the basis on the Mach kernel but with components from Berkeley Software Distribution, System V, and other sources.
Were these BSD and SysV components already present in OSF/1, were they imported directly or from Ultrix? Qwertyus 18:24, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: OSF/1 codebase?

message: Another question: could the OSF/1 kernel rightly be called a hybrid kernel? Qwertyus 16:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hybrid kernel? 

message: I added the bare bones of a version table, in the spirit of the release-by-release info on the Solaris or HP-UX pages.  I have not found release notes for versions before 4.0 anywhere online, so for dates on the older releases, I looked at posts in comp.unix.osf.osf1.  Release notes for the older versions would improve these dates.   Also, it would probably be good to list important "letter" releases like 4.0d, etc. I hope that with some more eyes on the table it can be made more useful.  JFinigan (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version table 

message: Most of the content of this page is about OSF/1 in general, not just Digital's version of it called Tru64 Unix.  I plan to create a new article, OSF/1, for the general information about OSF/1, leaving Tru64 Unix for the Digital implementations (including Digital Unix, DEC OSF/1). There is  also material in the Open Software Foundation article that I'll move to OSF/1. Any objections? --Macrakis (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable. Letdorf (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

text: ...and, finally, it's done! Letdorf (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Split into OSF/1 and Tru64 Unix?
Talk:Ultra-Man

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Vincente M. Ybor

message: What nationality was this man? --The MasterPedia 18:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: There is an arguement on this man's name... is it Vincente M. Ybor or Don Vincente M. Ybor? --The MasterPedia 18:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other first name?
Talk:PRINCE2: Initiating a project

message: This page adds useful extra information, most of which appears to be factually correct and matches Prince2 guidelines in the area of Initiation.   I think that to merge this into the main Prince2 page would make the main page excessively long and would also eliminate the possibility of re-using this as a reference in other areas that make use of Project Initiation 'prince style' such as ITIL Deployment. Mark G 13:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:McKinley High School (Louisiana)

message: This article did not read well nor did it conform to wiki guidelines.  I've removed apparent vandalism under the Alma Mater, the Alma Mater section itself,  and the Trivia section.  The Alma Mater is a copyright issue while the trivia does not conform.  I've added citations for notable alumni who don't already have articles.  This article could be improved with the addition of a section on academics and a couple of images of the school.Bgautrea (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup 
Talk:The Way of All Flesh

message: Did he "dare not publish it" or feel that its tone was "too contentious?"  The article on the novel and the article on the author are at odds on this point.
Roy Harmon 18:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: What is the function of saying that the book can be found in hardback and paperback? Isn't this a bit pedantic? And it also neglects digital copies online, audiobooks, etc. Moreover, what is the function of telling the page numbers of the book? It certainly doesn't agree with either copy of the novel I have. Even if it were true of one edition (even the first), what information is conveyed by including it? AnthroMimus (talk) 02:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose?
Talk:SAP implementation

message: ASAP is followed as an implementation methodology for many of the organisations
OMFG the worse article ever!!!!!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.86.34.163 (talk) 06:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: REALLY Poor article which does not address the realities of implementing SAP in a corporate environment. It is highly generic and grossly summarised and misses out on significant factors in implementing SAP. It reads as an article written by someone with no experience in SAP implementation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.28.92.59 (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The first time an acronym or abbreviation appears in an encyclopedia article, it should be spelled out, and defined in general terms that are comprehensible to people who are not already familiar with the subject matter. I'll try adding something to the first sentence to help with that. Palmpilot900 (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead makes no sense
Talk:William Maxwell Reed

message: Looking for more information on this sadly-neglected children's writer whose work inspired so many. Twang 18:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed AFSCME article from the External Links section as it leads nowhere but leave it here in case anyone wants to track down the original article.--Plad2 (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link
Talk:Constraint satisfaction dual problem

message: I am currently moving some of the content of this article to decomposition method. What should be left here is that decomposition methods can be seen as extensions of the translation from a problem to its dual. - Liberatore(T) 18:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Liberatore(T) 13:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving content
Talk:Requirement prioritization

message: My name is Doug Hubbard and I authored the article on Applied Information Economics Since I invented that method, I now only contribute to the discussion page.  Likewise, I have a COI in regards to a change in this article.
I had previously posted a reference to Applied Information Economics in this article as one method for prioritizing software requirements.  The person who removed it said it was new or not well-known enough.  I think the deletion discussion for the AIE article refutes that, but I will leave that to someone else to decide.
But since this article now only discusses a single method, Analytic Hierarchy Process, it seems like its really an article about AHP or, at least, the use of AHP to prioritize requirements.  If the article is really about multiple methods where AHP is only one solution, then it should have other solutions.  Otherwise, the article should be renamed or the more detailed description of AHP could just be moved to the AHP pageHubbardaie 03:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Announcing my COI but Still Have an Opinion
Talk:Mike Stephenson

message: Will people stop putting inaccurate information about Stevo on this page, please?  The joke is wearing thin.
[*] Just like his jokes :D
:and his Whino-centric bias —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.143.165.183 (talk) 17:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Truxton (video game)

message: I know the Sega Genesis port has the red weapon power level three as what the back of the cartridge storage box refers to as the "rainbow circle shot". In fact, the article references this red weapon power level three as sort of being like a shield.
I'll also explain the rainbow circle shot in more detail. In the Sega Genesis port, when the red weapon reaches power level three then the side pods emit circular rainbow colored lasers that act like a shield against an enemy ship ram attack without providing any enemy shot protection. But, I didn't see this at all when I played Midway distributed arcade version cabinet of Truxton--red weapon power level three is just a wider forward shooting spread providing absolutely no defense from the sides of the back of the ship against an enemy ship ram. Videos seen of the PC Engine port of Truxton also show the wider forward shooting spread, no rainbow circle shot was visible at any time.
So, is the rainbow circle shot just an exclusive change for the Sega Genesis port? Or do two arcade cabinet versions of Truxton/Tatsujin actually exist? Either way, I think the article should be clarified or corrected as needed regarding this rainbow circle shot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.255.132 (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red weapon power level three (rainbow circle shot vs. wider forward spread): Are there two versions of the arcade game Truxton/Tatsujin?
Talk:Relativistic beaming

message: Copyright Violation:
All 5 illustrations in this article do not have the permission of the other authors of the scientific paper they were previously published in to be published here.
AGN_Jet_Simple-Sphere-Model.png
 
AGN_Jet_Synchro-Spectrum.png
AGN_Jet_Aberration.png 
AGN_Jet_Dilation.png 
AGN_Jet_Blueshift.png
Mr Brak 19:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Just wanted to say, I like that in this article. I assume it will eventually be removed, but I wish I saw it in more of these articles, because half of it, I have no clue what the article is talking about. I do have an account here, but didn't feel like signing in 68.202.196.130 (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Glossary of Terms

message: Based on the "Copyvio" talk section above, I guess the text was lifted or lightly rewritten from some other source.
"The figure of the sample spectrum" doesn't exist.
\nu isn't defined ... but that's just the start: the use of terms and variables which are either undefined or used-before-defined is confusing and unclear.
The partial clarification of some terms and variables in the odd and un-Wikipedia-like "Terminology" end section is odd and un-Wikipedia-like.
There are few links to Wikipedia articles (many of them good!) for most of the "Terminology" section terms.
There are too few links to Wikipedia articles in general.
Much but not all of this mess is covered in detail in Relativistic Doppler effect
but there would still be value in something like this "A simple jet model" section
with more direct astronomical relevance and use of some customary astronomical/astrophysical terminology and approximations.
Sadly, I'm not in the field and can't help with that. 50.0.193.12 (talk) 18:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The entire "A simple jet model" section is a mess
Talk:Tim Deegan

message: Robert 23:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep 