lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paul Zimmermann (mathematician)

message: This article fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics) and Wikipedia:Verifiability, because there is no secondary source and I can't see any conditions met (meeted ... hm what's the word) fulfilled. Greetings. Sebastian scha. (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Met" is correct. Michael Hardy (talk) 02:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Might be notable' ? What about {blp} ? Nevertheless, I tag this for {notablility} and {originalresearch} and now my case is closed. Thank you and happy editing. Sebastian scha. (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I don't see BLP concerns here since no material in the article is contentious or controversial. I am not sure if the subject is sufficiently notable to satisfy WP:PROF but it is possible that he does. GoogleScholar does show several papers of his that are reasonably highly cited and WoS gives similar results. GoogleBooks results (even after filtering) are fairly substantial. I see that Zimmermann's team won some kind of competition on exact real arithmetics. I am not sure if the article would survive an AfD if nominated, but the case is not clear-cut and that is why I removed the prod. You are welcome to nominate for an AfD. Nsk92 (talk) 15:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

text: He has a few well cited publications, according to math reviews, and is responsible for several of the important algorithms in GMP.  I think this tends to qualify him under significant impact, WP:PROF#1.  To strictly qualify, one has to have a reliable source to back this up.  I suspect the SAGE project has probably published something to this effect.  Certainly not an article at top priority, but notable enough for inclusion. JackSchmidt (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Zimmermann's best work is behind him and does not warrant this site.  There are other less capricious people out there with far more impressive results that do not have wiki pages.  I agree with the initial proposal that this site should be deleted.TonyMath (talk) 06:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Language construct

message: Can someone give examples of language constructs? --Abdull (talk) 08:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Is "language construct" an accepted term outside of the PHP community? I can't remember seeing it with regards to generic program language theory, but I might not have paid enough attention. It is heavily used in the PHP manual to explain how some things that looks like functions are actually built-in syntactic tokens in the language. The article, however, seems to suggest that the term is more generic than that. --Lajm (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an accepted term outside of PHP circles? 

message: I would like to know  LukarPukar (talk) 22:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are functions and classes considered constructs
Talk:Phryctoria

message: This sounds identical to the Polybius square, invented a cntury earlier by Polybius... -- 202.63.39.58 (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roberto Alidosi

message: The WikiProject Biography can have the |auto=yes removed as it serves no purpose. The following attributes can be added to WikiProject Biography: |military-work-group=yes|military-priority=low – Sdd the WikiProject Italy to the WikiProject list and have the {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= and we're done! WikiProjects updated! Adamdaley (talk) 13:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Epideme

message: Wikipedia has lots of individual pages about individual episodes of different TV shows. Red Dwarf has a large cult following and so is more likely than most to have its pages visited... somebody should take that label off as far as I'm concerned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.40.107 (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at another episode with similar tags, it would appear to be listed due to lacking 3rd-party reference sources. However, since the series itself is notable, and every other episode in the series is listed, it would be stupid to delete this one article as 'non-notable'. Applying common sense -- Tags removed. EdJogg (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  how is this not notable??? 
Talk:MV Oceanic Viking

message: This ship has a "reinforce hull" that is "resistant to ice" but is it actually an icebreaker? ShipFan (talk) 07:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icebreaker or not? 

message: If anyone can be bothered researching the exact specifics - The Oceanic Viking has left The Australian Customs service and has been replaced by Ocean Defender. Apparently OV has gone back to Singapore to be converted back into a cable layer.Mandurahmike (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  OV Gone. 
Talk:1970 European Cup Winners' Cup final

message: Hello! Is it possible to add a file which contains the starting line-ups for both teams in the final?.
--88.91.100.244 (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting line-ups
Talk:Check Mii Out Channel

message: I noticed you requested to merge this into Wii Menu. i don't think it should be. This article is far too extensive to be merged. Also, it is notable per AfD failure. Smartyllama (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I don't know what Wikipedia is thinking. This should not be moved. It helps having ore information on one thing. It's just like all the T-V shows. They cut down the orginal pages and pushed them into one big page. I just wis th keptthi pag and made there own pge for the news channel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.2.199.205 (talk) 04:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No way Jose' 

message: It was the 11th in the US, but if you want to use UTC, you must also use the date in Britain.  says 11th in the US, and we all agree it was released at 7:45 PM EST on whatever day, so that would be 12:45 AM UTC on the 12th. Smartyllama (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: If anybody here has access to a Japanese wii and cares to translate, I am very curious as to what kind of contests they are having.  --68.13.115.6 (talk) 19:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that!  Doktor  Wilhelm  14:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese contests 

message: Can someone please put some reliable sources up in the article, so we can remove the tag? (I don't have time to do it right now). Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References needed 

message: The thing of it is, I believe that since this channel is just about Mii and is pretty much discussing "Mii uploading, downloading, and contests". It could be merged quite easily. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We might concider that! Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Mii? 
Talk:Star Singer

message: I have a suggestion to re-organise the main ISS page, so as to accommodate pages for future ISS series & edits.
"Idea Star singer"  will be kept as the main page describing about the show in a paragraph or two.
Then for each year "Idea Star Singer <yyyy>" separate branch of wiki pages linking from the main page.
That way we could keep information pertaining to each year at the relevant pages. 
For example, next year there could be a different controversy or rumour, so that we don’t clutter it or do edit mix up ;-)
Ranjini Haridas could be included as a seperate page. Discuss  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashrafmedia (talk • contribs) 21:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organisation and branching suggestion 

message: Isn't the programme title Star Singer? Idea is just the sponsor. Next year if the sponsor switches to Bhharti it will be called Bharti Star Singer. It's the same with many kerlaite programmes. Also see the junior version, Star Singer Jr - it's called Munch Star Singer Jr.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Little Professor (talk • contribs) 11:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programme title 

message: The section on the controversies related to the show do not have any references and it appears cluttered with rumors and allegations. It needs to be rewritten and references need to be added. Juneythomas (talk) 02:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  request cleanup/rewrite on the controversies section 

message: There is no information for the fifth season of the show, which i think should be concluded by now. Users following the show are requested to contribute information to this section. Juneythomas (talk) 02:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  content needed for ISS 2010 

message: The big writeup about Balakrishnan Shenoy's critisism about the program does not look appropriate here. It looks as if he is not a well renowned critic as is mentioned in the page. There is not even a single result in google with his name. i think he is just another person who is criticizing the program and does not have any particular importance as such to be mentioned here in this article.
Neetzz (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Neetzz, it is true, so added the template Unreferenced Section --hari 15:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Content without proper reference has been removed. - Hbkrishnan hari 11:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  who is this balakrishnan shenoy? 
Talk:Mike Loades

message: I accept that Mike Loades is a notable person, but please try to maintain a formal, neutral, 3rd party tone.  In particular, making glowing but unsupported and weasel worded claims regarding how other people view the subject looks a lot like marketing. Rogerborg (talk) 10:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a resume host 

message: Loades is described as a "military historian" and "writer," yet only seems to have edited a single book, and authored none. IMDB does not include any writing credits. I am therefore removing or amending the text accordingly. Nick Cooper (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious descriptions 

message: I tried my best to find online sources for him and got just five. These will barely support his notability so that this page will survive getting nominated for deletion because of WP:GNG. I feel this subject is just a bit higher than a person with borderline notability. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of available sources 

message: WHY YOU ARE BULLYING ME : ASKED YOU VERY FRIENDLY ABOUT MY ARMOURY FROM lORENZ hLMSCHMID AND OTHERS:
yOU CANCELLED ME FROM lISTS1
wHY?
i AM THE OWNER OF VERY OLD ARMOURY AND YOUR THOMAS BECKET SWORD:
yOU ARE VERY UNFRIENDLY AND IT SEEMS YOU ARE A WOMAN HATER
sHAME ON YOU1
cHEVALIER DAME ANNE OF CLEVES Tudorhexe (talk) 12:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIKE LOADES  NEVER ANSWERINGS QUESTIONS-ABOUT MY ARMOURY  LORENZ HELMSCHMID
Talk:RS Americas, Inc

message: It would be helpful to point out that the "RS" in the post-1999 portion of the History section refers to Electrocomponents brand name RadioSpares, and trading as RS Components, not to Allied Electronics's former affiliation with Radio Shack.  It appears that Electrocomponents was trading as RS Components since the 1970's, and archive.org shows the earliest web appearance of www.rs-online.com displaying an RS-branded page in 2004. (The domain itself appeared earlier, but not clearly associated with RS Components).  Gwideman (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "RS" does not refer to "Radio Shack" 

message: This article in EE Times of 2000-05-15 adds some detail (https://www.eetimes.com/allied-electronics-inc/).  The article covers the Electrocomponents' (ie: RS's) acquisition of Allied Electronics from Avnet. 
"Electrocomponents plc gained a foothold in the U.S. market with the July acquisition of Allied Electronics. And Avnet Inc., while divesting itself of its Allied catalog business, gained a fulfillment partner for small-lot orders." [...]
"Allied has changed hands frequently since its inception in 1928 in Chicago as Allied Radio. In 1962, Allied Radio created Allied Electronics as an industrial-sales division and published the first Allied Electronics Catalog. In 1967, LTV acquired Allied Radio.  After becoming part of Tandy Corp., Spartan Manufacturing Co., and Digitech, respectively, Allied in 1986 became a subsidiary of Hall-Mark Electronics, which was acquired by Avnet in 1993." Gwideman (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Allied history
Talk:Pit er Pat

message: I pretty much doubt that Pit er Pat is still active as Wikipedia claims. The last album is from 2010. In the decade following, Fay Davis-Jeffers had three albums out under the moniker FAY (see []). -- 2003:E5:1713:D695:4571:15AD:D8E6:3EF3 (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status
Talk:The Unprecedented Defence of the Fortress Deutschkreuz

message: IMDB lists this as a 1967 film, not 1966. Is the 66 date sourced from herzog on herzog? KellenT 10:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry my mistake- 66 was the production year (from H on H), 67 is the release year. Staecker (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: imdb date

message: "Deutschkreuz" should have a "t" between the "u" and "z" 174.73.199.70 (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name is misspelled
Talk:1969 European Cup Winners' Cup final

message: Hello! Is it possible to add a file which contains the starting line-ups for both teams in the final?.
--88.91.100.244 (talk) 15:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting line-ups
Talk:USS Sirius (AK-15)

message: There should be a second "see" link to the AK-15 section of the AK-12 article on the top of this page if you're going to use "AK-15" as a mere redirection to this.
The information on this page barely uses the identification model of the cargo ship to the point making it the main page of the word without providing alternate links to things with the same ID is hypocritical.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.83.217.14 (talk) 06:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  AK-12 Rifle Variant
Talk:Post road

message: I think the US constitution template is unneeded here as it does not even refer to post roads and just takes over the whole article as it stands now. Unless someone has a great reason to keep it, I will remove it. ww2censor (talk) 18:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: I remember reading some time ago that when Benjamin Franklin was the Assistant/Deputy Postmaster General, he had mile markers erected along the post roads, many of which still exist. Do you have any further information on this aspect of US post roads? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benjamin Franklin & post roads in the USA
Talk:Football tennis

message: Would it be possible to merge this article with Soccer tennis ? Looks to me like unnecessary duplication.
GIRTON COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE VS COLLINGWOOD COLLEGE DURHAM? BRING IT!!!! ANYTIME!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.180.83 (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

message: Footballtennis ("nohejbal" in czech) is much older. Soccer players in Czechoslovakia started playing it in some 1930s (if not 1920s), 1944 first rules, from 1962 official contests etc. See history on official czech association site: http://nohejbal.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=122&Itemid=116
88.103.75.84 (talk) 15:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Is Jokgu identical with Footballtennis? It seems to be at least very similar and should be mentioned. --Marco Schmidt (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jokgu 

message: People in Pakistan Want to see Pakistnai Dramas. Here is a web which has many dramas named www.fixchannel.com. Here you can see all the pakistani dramas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shafiq ahmed Baloch (talk • contribs) 12:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistani Dramas 

message: The lede says any part of the body except the hands may be used but the history section says (originally?) any part except the arms.
Also, I don't want to get into a soccer/American football fight, but couldn't we use the word soccer when describing the ball? It would clarify things. Kdammers (talk) 01:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion 

message: Is there someother variants of thefootball tennis? Street football game? and this, what it is? indoor football tennis?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawid2009 (talk • contribs) 17:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  other variants 

message: This wording seems to be too promotional: "is a fantastic sport." Kdammers (talk) 13:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  encyclopedic language
Talk:Sword of Sodan

message: Is it just me or is this not neutral?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.82.183 (talk) 06:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which part(s) specifically do you find not being neutral? The only thing I can see being potentially at issue is the detail surrounding Scott Patterson and why he was fired from doing the Apple IIGS port (I can change that to simply say the programmer had to be replaced, causing a delay). Or perhaps some of the descriptive wording about the IIGS port? Though none of it is inaccurate or biased.--Apple2gs (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:United States men's national soccer team managers

message: This currently points to the wrong article (about a different Bill Lloyd).  Does the correct article exist somewhere?  Gecko G (talk) 11:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out. I've fixed it, though the correct article doesn't seem to have been written yet. Cheers, faithless (speak) 12:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I see what happened - after I created the template, someone created an article for a different Bill Lloyd. Since there was no Bill Lloyd yet, the template pointed to that article, so I changed the link to Bill Lloyd (soccer). faithless (speak) 12:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link: Lloyd ('34-'37)
Talk:Cirsonella

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella consobrina

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cirsonella densilirata

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fort Jesus

message: There is a queer contradiction about the name: if the name Jesus comes from Isa bin Tarif (1837), what was the name before, as the Portuguese built the fortress? --Sokoljan (talk) 11:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Mike Parr

message: Is Mike Parr related to Victorian sculptor Lenton Parr?Julia Rossi (talk) 10:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationships
Talk:Non-essentialism

message: The article is clearly set up to be a refutation of anti-essentialism. All it needs is Occam's Razor: although they may exist, non-essential entities can never be found, so let's just shave them from ontology; now this is a great confutation of the article's straw man, but it doesn't work on real non-essentialism. --Le vin blanc (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Fyodor Kryukov

message: How was Sholokhov's authorship of ALL 4 VOLUMES proved conclusively? Thank you. Rakovsky (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a ridiculous article; the entire thing is about the Sholokhov controversy, which is rightly part of the Sholokhov article and deserves no more than a passing mention here.  You'd never know from this article that Kryukov was an author himself, not just an alleged source of plagiarism; check out the list of works in the Russian Wikipedia article.  This needs to be completely rewritten (the Russian article could serve as a template). Languagehat (talk) 20:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 
Talk:Billy Bean (musician)

message: This article was and still is redolent with original research and or plagiarism. I am going to try and fix it over the days weeks and moths to come. Please feel free to join me if you like. I usually try to refrain from making major reverts like the ones I made thus far but this was an extreme case. :Albion moonlight (talk) 11:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Holy Moley