lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Delusional parasitosis

message: The article contains references to self-diagnosis. For example, "Since the early 2000s, a strong internet presence has led to increasing self-diagnosis." I believe that for example that sentence is trying to say something to the effect that more people begin to experience this delusion after exposure to it online, that they are self-diagnosing nonexistent myiasis. But the phrasing instead seems to say they're self-diagnosing with delusional parasitosis, when anosognosia is an inherent trait of the disorder, making self-diagnosis impossible. Likewise "Morgellons is considered to be a self-diagnosed subtype of this condition, in which individuals have sores that they believe contain harmful fibers." Self-diagnosing with morgellon's is similarly impossible by definition. In this case, the sentence seems to intend to cast doubt on the status of that disorder as a diagnosis by labelling it "merely self-diagnosed." That bias then leads to the contradictory statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.13.201 (talk) 07:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article can be edited by you as it is not currently protected. Ping  to review the above suggestion. Azuredivay (talk) 08:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the ping; the cited text is from Moriarty, which is not freely available.  I will locate the source (somewhere on my other computer, or buried in a file in my desk) and add some quotes so this can be clarified better, probably by the end of today. SandyGeorgia (Talk)  14:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

text: I've located the source, and as our article reflects accurately what it says, there is no need to add quotes to the article. I have made these adjustments; the self-diagnosis is Morgellons. (It is unclear why the OP says, "Self-diagnosing with morgellon's is similarly impossible by definition.") From the 2019 source, which is a recent secondary review:  SandyGeorgia (Talk)  20:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the review. I made the right choice not making any edits myself.66.190.13.201 (talk) 06:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to self-diagnosis in the context of a persistent psychosis are confusing and should be revised out 

message: Erm, halitosis can be very real and is described as such by the hyperlink in the word halitosis.
I do not content that the subject may believe these ailments to be much worse than they really are, but the article describes them as outright delusions, which they are not. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:8005:3B14:C6E:1AFB (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure you're parsing that text correctly, but if you were confused by it, so likely are others. Does this address your concern? SandyGeorgia (Talk)  16:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  after other types of delusions such as body odor or halitosis
Talk:Praetorian prefecture

message: The map shown in the article is not correct. The map certainly not show the situation in 350 AD, since the Praetorian prefecture of Illyricum was divided in 379 AD, and this map show only eastern part of Illyricum. User:PANONIAN
---
---
---
Frankly, why referring to the Greek translation of Le Mond (sic!) Byzantin I - L'Empire romain d'orient (330-641)??? 89.56.34.175 (talk) 08:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that's the version I have, and that's the version I've used as a source. And yes, "mond" is weird, but its is written thus, so... Constantine   ✍  10:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Tietê River

message: I'm expanding this article based on the Portuguese FA. If anyone wants to help, feel free to continue. Fetofs Hello! 13:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I'm not familiar with the river, but I'm going to try to clean up the intro. It needs help from a native English speaker. 
Former text: "The name Tietê was registered for the first time on a map of the year 1748: the map d’Anville[2] ,In tupi, the name signifies "The truthful river", or " truthful waters[3]"
173.164.86.190 (talk) 18:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's more in the sources section I've found. I don't think "cobbles" is appropriately used, also. After a dictionary check it seems to be a made-up usage, although I have to admit I like the use. 173.164.86.190 (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording..
Talk:X-class submarine

message: I seriousily doubt that the x class had a range of 1000 miles...
Could anybody post links that tell how much fuel the x class had?
:The X-Craft was towed to it's target area by a full-size submarine and the endurance figures given are more a question of how long the passage crew could tolerate the conditions inside. I don't have a figure available, but at a guess, the actual range of the X-Craft is probably only about 50-100 miles or so. Ian Dunster 20:53, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found a range figure - it's 82 Nautical miles (151.8 km) at 2 knots. Ian Dunster 14:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just found some more figures - that 82 nm one above was the submerged range - surfaced range was a surprising 500 nm. The 500 nm figure itself is for the training XT class but I am assuming that the range would be the same for the operational X & XE classes as well. Ian Dunster 15:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Range

message: Which is the approved style for submarine designations, X1, X-1 or X.1? (see also this discussion). Drutt (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: Hi, I just read this and was wondering what an ERA is. I don't think many readers will be familiar with it - I've read a lot of military history and haven't seen it. Can someone put it in brackets after the first use?Wodawik (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ERA = Engine Room Artificer, i.e. a mechanic. I've added the explanation to the page. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ERA 

message: I cannot find any contemporary London bus that used this type of Gardner engine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.130.59 (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You possibly mean 'contemporaneous'. 121.44.185.245 (talk) 09:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine use. 

message: Was she been really salvaged for museum restoration as is mentioned at text? But then.....where she is now and why is not mentioned in "surviving examples"? Thanks for info --Hornet24 (talk) 02:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-7 

message: According to "Modern Submarine Warfare" (Miller, Jordan, 1987, Military Press), X-8 was lost during the Tirpitz operation when under tow in the North Sea. rough weather caused the starboard side pannier to spring a leak; it was jettisoned and exploded several minutes later, causing no damage. The port pannier shortly after developed a similar problem and was jettisoned as well. Its 120 minute time fuse functioned properly, yet the resulting explosion caused serious damage to both the X-8 and the tow vessel, even at a distance of 3 miles. The authors give this as an example of the unpredictable nature of explosions under water. They claim the damage forced the crew to abandon the X-8.
70.16.213.248 (talk) 16:54, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-8 

message: Here are two images of the X-7 crew from Commons if anyone wants to use them in the article. From Hill To Shore (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of X-7 crew
Talk:Star Wars video games

message: Not finding much on this article other than a mention in a 1UP article (unless it's all in print sources). Since it is a cancelled game, this article may be best merged into the parent article until enough sources are pulled to substantiate individual notability. czar · · 23:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Star Wars: Return of the Jedi: Ewok Adventure]] 

message: So anyone have any thoughts on how Star Wars: Force Arena should be classified? It's a mobile game, but I'm not sure how you would class it. Agarak (talk) 04:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Force Arena 

message: Merging both articles would make it easier to list and describe all Star Wars videogames without loosing track, also as it is now both articles are lacking merging both would make a better article all-around. For everyone and forget the canon we are listing them by video games console generation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosvel92 (talk • contribs) 
:I broadly agree. I would be concerned about WP:SIZE issues, but those can probably be resolved. --Izno (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: WP:SIZE remains a problem, which is why separate list articles exist. I note that the size issue has not been resolved over the last 15 months. Klbrain (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[Star Wars video games]] and [[List of Star Wars video games]]

message: The game Star Wars: Droid Repair Bay (2017) is missing from the list.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/726910/Star_Wars_Droid_Repair_Bay/ Isma.C (talk) 12:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Droid Repair Bay" is missing
Talk:Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt

message: The list given here conflicts with most lists I have seen, which give Pedubast and Shoshenq IV (and sometimes Iuput I) as the first rulers of this dynasty, leave Takelot II in the 22nd Dynasty, and give Iuput II as the last ruler of the dynasty.  Anyone want to comment? john k 21:09, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict

message: Hey, I know everyone wants to show off just how much they know about ancient Egyptian history (& prove they've read more than a simple amateur like me has), but let's keep the amount of detail on the specific rulers to a minimum -- the articles on those individuals is where we should be adding details & footnotes, not the tables in this article. If I remember a week from now, I'll take the time to move all of that stuff out of this article, but consider that I'm providing fair warning to all of you that I'll be making these changes to this article. -- llywrch 01:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reduced the size of the tables (looks like the other dynasty articles now), and will make sure the removed info goes into the individual articles. Markh 17:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More clean-up needed 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:First dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: This article has several issues relating to dates. For one most of the kings on the list do not fit in with the set 837–728 time period for Dynasty 23. Furthermore, a Dynasty in the Egyptian sense does not necessarily represent a family, as in the traditional sense of the word but rather the country of Egypt during the earlier mentioned time period (notice the capital D in Dynasty in the title, as it is a proper noun). Any thoughts? HeathIsling 22:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline Issues
Talk:Trade paperback (comics)

message: The article gives a correct definition of U.S. Comics published in TPB form.
It probably needs two more sections:
* One section comparing and linking with other forms of comic books in other countries, e.g., Japanese Mangas or Franco-Belgian "albums" (e.g., Tintin's)
* One section recalling the history and evolution of the American TPB. How it started relatively recently. How collections of reprints (e.g., Marvel Treasury Edition's in 1974) predated the actual form.
Comments? PhS 21:13, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What is missing in this article?
Talk:Reluctance

message: The equation was originally referred to as R as the SI unit for reluctance, this is incorrect S is the SI unit for reluctance
:All my references (e.g. A Dictionary of Physics. Ed. Alan Isaacs. Oxford University Press, 2000; Newnes Dictionary of Electronics, Newnes 1999; Chambers 21st Century Dictionary, Chambers Harrap Publishers Limited 2001; Britannica Online 2005) say R (or r in the case of Britannica).  The SI brochure and BIPM website do not mention reluctance at all.  What is your reference for S, please? --Heron 17:10, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Equation
Talk:Marcus O'Day

message: I was unable to determine where Dr. O'Day obtained his Ph.D. or other degrees, so there's a bit of a gap in the biography. Hopefully somebody else will have more success. — RJH 21:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

message: We still need to know where O'Day received his Ph.D. Also note that it is standard Wikipedia policy to use a lone last name in references, and to not use any title. We should refer to him in any case where his full name is not needed just as O'Day.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need more information
Talk:Nutria

message: isn't there a major brand of sports drink -- perhaps powdered -- and/or health supplement by this name?  first off...YECCH, named after a RAT?  secondly, shouldn't there be a disambig here?
i've barely heard of this animal.  but the drink (or supplement?) one is ubitquitous, at least in the US.  2601:19C:527F:A660:982:5901:EC2C:D654 (talk) 03:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  drink
Talk:Unconsciousness

message: Courts rarely consider "falling asleep" (especially while driving or during surgery) to be an acceptable defense;
Falling asleep during surgery as a defense?? huh?? Can somebody explain that please...? --WS 21:39, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the courts have to consider the question quite often. See automatism and automatism (case law), the latter having a detailed discussion of sleep problems. David91 09:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Falling asleep during surgery

message: It is wrong - please check --Frankesko (talk) 10:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish interwiki

message: it is confusing that the first (feeling like the main) picture of the article is described as showing something having to do with hypnosis, while a little farther down the article text emphazises that the article subject has nothing to do with hypnosis. 
I don't know how to fix this myself, maybe someone else has an idea how to do it (possibly simply removing the picture?).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3037:41D:9021:2:2:5F04:93BC (talk) 07:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture versus text about hypnosis
Talk:Billy Bailey

message: There's not much out there regarding Bailey's birthdate, but this article from CNN published in 1996 suggests it's 1947. If anyone can find something more definitive saying he was born in 1946, please change it back. justsomechick·chat·stuff 21:48, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No references, added tag.--FloNight 20:50, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: No references

message: Is it just me or does this go into, at times, almost lurid detail? Besides the question of "Do we really need to know?", I'd like to know exactly HOW whoever added that knew that. Comments? 68.39.174.238 00:41, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This subject is of interest in the death penalty debate, especially as it was the last hanging in the United States. Comparing different methods is of strong relevance especially as the method of lethal injection has come under strong legal fire in the last few years. Of course, also keep in mind that "Wikipedia is not censored" is one of the main principles of Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CENSOR#Wikipedia_is_not_censored StaticElectric (talk) 23:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detail 

message: http://www.geocities.com/trctl11/bailey.html
I became suspicious after reading the line "six coil noose swaying in the night breeze". To me that sounds more like a piece of literary journalism rather than an encyclopedic entry. After entering the whole line in quotation marks on Google, the above listed web page comes up. It seems that the whole section on execution in this article was stolen from the above website.
:This information has been released into the public domain by its author; see http://www.geocities.com/trctl11/bibliography.html 124.148.63.198 02:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarism 

message: In what year did the crimes occur?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.251.169.70 (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of crimes 
Talk:Catchpole

message: The page seems to contain spoof. The Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary says: 
Catchpole, from ME cacchepol, fr. OE caecepol, fr. (assumed) ONF
cachepol, lit., chicken chaser, fr. ONF cachier + pol chicken, fr. L pullus--more at catch, pullet. --Ghirla -трёп- 10:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoof 

message: Paragraph 2, entire:
:A second source of the name, also dating from medieval England, mostly in Norfolk and Dorset, comes from the local tax collectors. It was often the case that smallholders were unable to pay cash for their local land-owners tax and hence collectors were sent round to take goods in lieu. When the tradition that one's surname was one's profession took hold and passed through the generations, the name became contracted to Catchpole.
What, precisely, "became contracted to Catchpole"? There's nothing in the text that could fill that slot. ISTM that this may have been sloppily copied and edited from some other source with the critical info left out... at least, that's the most generous explanation I can think of. --Thnidu (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing information in paragraph 2 

message: After the above concerns about the unreferenced claims in the article, and now its being mocked in the authoritative World Wide Words, it's time to cut the Gordian Knot.  I've revised the etymology to that given by dictionaries and World Wide Words.  And noted the false reference to catching tax-owers with a pole.  I also removed the reference "mostly in Norfolk and Dorset", since that too was unreferenced. Onanoff (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The etymology is far from solid. No dictionaries are cited and the only source is of dubious authority. Plus "the etymology is wrong because it was mocked by some site, and the reason why that site is right is that that site mocked the etymology" is obviously circular reasoning. I'm amending that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.66.133 (talk) 01:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Solid etymology

message: Clicking the links to both those names goes to people,who have exactly the same dats which seems odd.PortfolioMind (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry and Thomas 

message: What an interesting surname! Now, thanks to the article's summary, I've an idea of it stemming from some random tax collector from medieval England which makes the name all the more...unique. --86.21.101.169 (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow
Talk:Fred Beckey

message: The article specifically states that Beckey did not care about money, did not have a job or professional career that could have yielded an income. He did not accept endorsement offers and did not make money from his books. Yet he outfitted hundreds of climbing expeditions, which is expensive, and he had the usual human needs for food, clothing and shelter. Various friends and acquaintances in the doc laugh and imply he was a "cheap pr**k", but no one has a definitive answer.  Where did he get the money? The documentary DIRTBAG has a glancing reference to this question. In one scene Beckey is supposedly on the phone inquiring about the value of his stocks. It's hard to believe he lived on the proceeds of a stock portfolio, but that's offered as a possibility. Does anyone actually know the source of Beckey's income?
Younggoldchip (talk) 13:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Did Beckey Finance His Expeditions and Other Life Needs?
Talk:Lucien (DC Comics)

message: Is it necessary to have this under "Lucien (DC Comics)" rather than just "Lucien"? There is no "Lucien" page currently, so if there are other significant Luciens, "Lucien" should probably be a disambiguation page (or a redirect to the most famous Lucien), and if there aren't, I see no reason why this couldn't be moved to there... -Silence 21:54, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Interstate 526

message: Completion of i-526 across islands to the James Island connector is a controversial issue in Charleston. This morning a letter to the local newspaper editor cited the (correct) language on Wikipedia about the Savannah highway interchange being "incomplete" and my first thought was, Here come the would-be revisionists to change the word "incomplete" to something else. Not sure how I'm supposed to alert the top editors that this might be an issue today. I believe the interchange is best described as incomplete, regardless which side of the controversy. Fergdoug (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no "top editor," but their are those, like myself, that patrol the page from time to time.  Haven driven I-526 myself, wrote some of the history of it and listed references, I know it is also "incomplete;" if someone were to make changes saying otherwise, it would likely be reverse.  If anything else, we also have a "view history" tab for when changes were made and by whom. So no worries.  --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete interchange of I-526
Talk:Cycle of the West

message: I just finished punching up in a major way the article on John Neihardt, but felt that his major work, the Cycle, needed to be listed on its own.  I can put some of the basic info up, but I am by no means an expert on poetry or literary history.  "Enjambement" was a new one to me when I went to read on "heroic couplets"!!!  So if anyone who has more experience than I do wants to add to the appreciation of what I think is an amazing work of literary art, please do so.
In the meantime, I'll just add a few more details when I get to it.
--KJPurscell 22:02, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To start with...

message: May somebody tell me the meaning of words below?
Is " deal out some requisite summary justice"means Hugh Glass killed them both?
but only to set out to track down his betrayers and deal out some requisite summary justice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.150.10.196 (talk) 00:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: what's the meaning of...