lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Serdtse (song)

message: Although the short traditional version quoted here is almost certainly the way it was sung in the film (does anyone know this for sure, having seen the film?), I guess (because the way Leshchenko rearranged the piece) that there was actually also a longer traditional version. With a C and a D part, differing of course from the Akwarium version. Only I cannot find it. Anyone luckier than me?
User_talk:Pan_Gerwazy--pgp 16:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long original version? 

message: "The song has been claimed as typically Ukrainian, Odessite, Jewish and Roma (sometimes at the same time).  Three of the artists involved in the genesis were in fact Russian-speaking Ukrainians: the composer who was of Jewish descent (but from Kharkiv), and the two singers who were from Odessa or born nearby."
There was no Ukraine when it was created. 
# How could it be "typically Ukrainian"? 
# "Three of the artists involved in the genesis were in fact Russian-speaking Ukrainians" - where is the prove that they were Ukrainians? ... "Jewish descent (but from Kharkiv)" - from Kharkiv? He was born in Kharkov, Russian Empire.
Spasibo! 77.13.56.196 (talk) 22:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguments
Talk:Mercury House

message: Re: "It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page. (Discuss)"
I agree with this but I'm not sure how to do a disambiguation page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Txensen (talk • contribs) 
: I agree too, and split it, trying to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Disambiguation.  Hope I did it right! Note there seem to be even further meanings, especially of buildings. --Cedderstk 20:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:John Bertram Phillips

message: I'm nominating this for POV check.  The ending in particular seems highly complimentary: "Phillips was a masterful apologist and defender of the Christian faith. He upheld the basic tenets of the faith, and was able to present them fresh to the modern reader and hearer, much as he had done so with his translation of the New Testament." And do we really need quotes about how awesome he is?  68.104.173.148 (talk) 04:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the POV maintenance template since the sentence mentioned above is no longer in the article. --ChoG (talk) 14:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV check 

message: Very surprised that the Page title isn't 'J.B. Phillips', the name on most his books. The full name is not familiar to most people. Valetude (talk) 23:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Heinz Sachsenberg

message: I removed the list of pilots attached to the Protection Staffel, as they are already listed under the JV 44 article. Abel29a 17:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions.
No de.wiki article exists. Did not hold a significant command and topped out as Leutnant. Successful completion of missions (sorties flown, # of enemy aircraft shot down, etc) is not part of SOLDIER. A MilHist RfC on this topic has failed to gain consensus in May of 2017: 
*MilHist:RfC on the notability of flying aces.
Please also see a note at  MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. 
K.e.coffman (talk) 04:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Vincenzo da Filicaja

message: I've changed "Figline Valdarno" with "Figline". Vincenzo da Filicaja always referred to his house in the countryside as "Figline". "Figline" was the former name of his house (nothing to do with Figline Valdarno!) but both the actual name and the name in his time is "Filicaja" or "Al Filicaja".
 Al Filicaja
Antonio da Filicaja
--151.27.21.61 16:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anne Charlotte Leffler

message: There seems to be a discrepancy as to the name of Anne Charlotte's father. This article claims Anne's father was "the mathematician Prof. C. O. Leffler", but her brother Gösta's article lists his parents as "school principal John Olof Leffler and Gustava Wilhelmina Mittag". I presume C.O. Leffler and John Olof Leffler are the same person. Which name and profession is correct?--Srleffler 16:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Gösta Mittag-Leffler#Father's name?. Tomas e (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: She did not seperate from her first husband until March 1889 (the article says 1884). She married del Pezzo i May 1890. This information can be found in Monica Lauritzens book Sanningens vägar (2012), page 420-473.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.225.226 (talk) 04:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperation from her husband
Talk:Raghavan N. Iyer

message: It is obviously a good idea to merge two pages about the same person. Since both the page raghavan N Iyer and the page Raghavan Iyer discuss the theosophist and lecturer of that name.
the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raghavan_Iyer page suffers from lack of substance: it is a collection of quotes that ought to be moved to the quotes-wiki and has links that unfortunately don't always contain actual content, there are doubles there as well as links that simply don't contain any content any more. 
Since the page without the N doesn't contain any information that isn't also on the longer page, I would suggest turning Raghavan Iyer into a redirect to Raghavan N Iyer immediately. (tried doing so, but it seems I'm not allowed to)
kh7 16:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I removed the flag saying it may need cleanup because the article appears fairly straightforward and does not deviate from Wikipedia standards to any excessive degree.  If one feels that flag is truly justified than they should simply make the changes or at a minimum place a note in this discussion page to specify exactly what the problem is.
I also removed the flag saying it doesn't cite sources because it does at the end in the 'Sources' section. (Basically it comes from the website dedicated to Iyer and the bio as cited there was written by Iyer himself.
Waveformula 03:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tags

message: I have tagged :File:Theosophy_org.gif, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 09:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Theosophy_org.gif]] may be deleted
Talk:Thin-film optics

message: I think that Optical coating, Multilayer optics, and Thin-film optics should be merged, probably under the latter title. While we're at it, Optical coating#Antireflection coatings should be merged into Anti-reflective coating (which should be kept as a separate article), and the section on AR coatings in the general optical coatings article should be replaced with a brief summary, per Wikipedia:Summary style. Comments?--Srleffler 08:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree these need to be merged and Thin-film optics would be the best title. Dtneilson 14:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The merge of the AR coatings section into Anti-reflective coating is complete. The larger 3-way merge remains to be done.--Srleffler 06:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I have merged multilayer optics into optical coating. Does it still seem reasonable to merge that into this article? Perhaps the topic is big enough to keep the two separate.--Srleffler 06:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old merge proposal

message: I have proposed that Thin-film interference be merged with Thin-film optics. I'm comfortable with either title. What do others think?--Srleffler (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully support this. It's merely a different sub-topic of the same subject. I do feel myself leaning toward the name thin-film interference, simply because this describes the phenomenon itself whereas thin-film optics denotes the branch of science that deals with it. I really could see it either way, though. Zaereth (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Actually, having given this more thought, "Thin-film optics" may be the better choice for the title. I don't know. I'm no expert on the subject. Perhaps this term also covers other thin films. Would metallic coatings also fall under thin-film optics?Zaereth (talk) 09:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Thin film optics and thin film interference should be kept separate.  The hyperlink is good enough as an explanation of how thin film optics work.  Combining the two does not take into account the fact that interferometric methodologies are used to measure the thickness of thin films and a title of "thin film optics" would make such a search very difficult indeed.Bilbo701 (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the merge tags. This merge does not have consensus.--Srleffler (talk) 04:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New merge proposal
Talk:List of The Strangerhood characters

message: This article was created by splitting out the "Characters" section from The Strangerhood. The versions of the text previous to this can be found by checking the history of The Strangerhood up to the point of 02:10, June 16, 2006 (UTC+10).--Drat (Talk) 16:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GFDL notice

message: I reverted the edit because we have no idea yet what the nature of Season 2 will be, and whether or not the same characters will be present. Anything else is really speculation.--Drat (Talk) 16:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah you're right. I just thought it didn't really matter. But we'll make it when season 2 comes... or not :P --Jort227 (Talk) 16:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of Season 1 header 

message: I removed the following from the article on Joel Heyman, as the article should be about the person, not the nature of the characters he voices. Perhaps something is salvageable.--Drat (Talk) 03:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did anybody else notice he has a strong resmblance to Shaggy from Scooby Doo (if only in voice).  Voicingmaster 02:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text dump 

message: Wade appears to be a stereotypical party dude/hippie, and appears to be permanently stoned. He often recalls events that never occurred, and speaks slowly, often calling people "Dude", or "Man".
:Did anybody else notice he has a strong resmblance to Shaggy from Scooby Doo (if only in voice).  Voicingmaster 02:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wade
Talk:Elite (comics)

message: As there are various teams using variations on the name it seemed wise to remove the redirect and create a disambiguation page here and then remove the one at The Elite and add another entry there (Emperor 17:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this should just be a redirect to the Elite (disambiguation) page.  The entries here could be included there without a loss of navigability. -- JHunterJ 19:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season/Alberto

message: Could Alberto regenerate into a tropical or subtropical storm once it goes back over the Atlantic? CrazyC83 15:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It could, but unless it dissapated to the point that the NHC considered less than a disturbance, it would still be Alberto.  Worse (Best, depends on your POV), a restrenghtening to Tropical Storm that might cause minor problems around Newfoundland or such. Donovan Ravenhull 16:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it would still be Alberto no matter what. Restrengthening is likely, I am just thinking along the lines of regaining tropical characteristics. CrazyC83 17:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That is conceivable but not predicted.  It will not spend enough time over warm waters after it emerges into the Atlantic for that to happen, and it takes it for a system to transition from being extra-tropical to being tropical.  BTW - Storms regaining tropical status after re-emerging into the Atlantic are not unknown.  Hurricane Agnes reformed off of North Carolina after its remnants got to the Atlantic (and then it did its real damage).  I have also seem more recent exmaples of this, but I cannot name them offhand at this time. --EMS | Talk 18:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't Allison 01 regain subtropical characteristics? íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 19:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It did, but it wasn't moving nearly as quickly as Alberto is forecast to. --Coredesat 20:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep, it's over water now. Best chance for reformation (although it is a slight one at best) would be about 12-24 hours from now. CrazyC83 21:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is jdorje gonna add the HPC advisory to the track map? I added the data to the track file thingy; I hope that's ok. íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 21:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello? íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 22:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Ex-Alberto isn't that powerful...yet. I'm under its clouds right now, and all I'm getting is moderate amounts of rain and some wind gusts. It's pretty calm as of 7:56 EDT (or EST, whatever). íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 11:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: No chance of it regaining tropical characteristics, especially given the very high shear over it (60-70 kt). --Coredesat 22:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformation?
Talk:Beulah Bondi

message: caption for photograph?EunuchOmerta 16:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: IMdB, All Movie and Find-a-Grave all say she was born in 1888.  Any good reason why we're saying 1889?  --  JackofOz (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As nobody has a explanation for that divergence I'll change that now. --LordOider (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: Could we please get a better photo? The current one is kind of blury. Its not terrible, but its lacking. :| --RyanTee82 (talk) 08:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Better photo?

message: Born in Chicago, IL, or Valparaiso, IN?  ----
:The linked source says she was born in Chicago, so I changed it in the infobox.  Coulraphobic123 (talk) 17:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Wasn't her last name actually "Biondi"...not "Bondi" 2600:6C64:6D7F:EE3A:70F7:EEF7:238D:B62C (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Wikipedia talk:Birthday Committee/BDC Bulletin 1

message: Just keeping this here for reference:
Birthday Committee Bulletin Board	
I just have a few general announcements for all BDC members. I (Steveo2) will be signing all messages that I wrote, and Mr. Turcotte will sign all of his announcements when he takes over, in order to avoid confusion. 
*I've removed some old announcements, assuming that you've seen them by now. If not, you can always look at the archive found at Wikipedia:Birthday Committee/Bulletin Archive Steveo2
*So, I'll be away in about a week, and Mr. Turcotte will be replacing me as leader from June 14 to September 10, as you probably know by now. I'm probably going to (citing the 25th Amendment) reclaim my position when I come back. Anyway, he knows who to pass it on to if he changes his mind, so it's all good. Steveo2
*First, I've changed the rules for new birthday templates. You only need my approval if the template is drastically different from the ones already existing. (Just to be clear,  I realize I have no right to dictate which templates you can make and keep. However, only the ones I approve will appear on the Wikipedia:Birthday Committee page.  Steveo2
*We have a new member: Butterflys. Be sure to welcome her if you get the chance. Steveo2
*If you'd like, you may post on this bulletin board. It's found on Template:BDC Bulletin 1. You may use it to suggest new policy changes, or anything else you think is too important to only go on the talk page. Sign all announcements that you add. Steveo2
*Thank you to GeorgeMoney for helping out with all of the templates. (Which, I might add, were his idea in the first place.) Steveo2
*The next member birthday is:Mr. Turcotte (June 25). nathanrdotcom's is July 3, not too far after that. Steveo2
*Thanks to everyone who gave me birthday wishes on June 6. (Hey, Thistheman, where do you live? You're always, by far, the first one to give everyone a message. Including me.) Steveo2
*Since the creation of the 1st template on April 27, over 60 members have gotten birthday messages from us. The 50th person to receive a birthday message from us was Jnothman, on June 5, 2006. The message was sent by Thistheman at 4:40 UTC that day. I really think we're doing a great job, and I'd like to sincerely thank all of you. Steveo2
*I'm sorry that the archive for this bulletin is getting out of date. I'm getting pretty busy now, and it might be a long while before I do it. Sorry. Steveo2
Last updated  by Steveo2 19:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:20th century BC

message: Certian images have been removed by me because they have been added to a category that makes them speediable, most likely :Category:Images with no copyright tag. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 16:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed image(s)

message: What is the source of that date?
This Harvard source shows it to be 5 March 1952
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1994JBAA..104..293D
2nd page, left column bottom  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.182.187 (talk) 15:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge on the The February 1953 date 

message: What is 2000 BC 156.155.97.190 (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is 2000 BC
Talk:AMX-13

message: I have two books here that list armour as 10mm - 40mm. Armoured Fighting Vehicles by Philip Trewhitt and Tanks by Christopher Foss. Should we keep the current 25mm listed or replace it with these numbers? Edward Sandstig 16:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armour thickness 

message: This article seems quite complete. Should it be re-assessed, to move it up from "START"? Regards,DPdH (talk) 05:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: I added a ref and subsequently I realized that it is already listed in the References section - but according to my copy, the author was Walter Spielberger (also by the Worldcat listing.) Col. E.F. Offord, is in the book given as a copyright holder, which is, I presume, not the same thing. Shouldn't this be changed in the article?Gheronihmo (talk) 16:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armour in profile no. 12 - authorship 
Talk:List of Old West lawmen

message: This article has too many wonderful names with no Wiki links. Anyone want to adopt a name or two? hahahahaha lol this websie is sooo coolSoapy 16:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: There are some great lawmen listed here...but, sooner or later those without Wikipedia links will be deleted.  Now is the time to pick one and write an article!  Soapy 15:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not add people without Wikipedia articles  

message: The decree by a single individual that people without articles should not be added is arbitrary and illogical. Adding a notable name here may encourage someone to begin an article about an individual. It already contains a substantial number of such names in any case. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 21:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding people without articles

message: Don't forget Luke Short.65.129.160.36 (talk) 01:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luke Short 

message: I noticed that most of the entries in this article have "No Image Available" under the Portrait section despite the fact that most of the articles listed have images which raises the question of whether they can be used in this article.--TommyBoy (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question regarding Portrait Section
Talk:Berserk PS2 Soundtrack

message: Part of mass nom. I suggest to let that run it's course. -- Koffieyahoo 02:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy 

message: Does anyone have the lyrics of opening song "Sign" or at least know what language it is? Shawnc 10:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics
Talk:Berserk anime soundtrack

message: Part of mass nom. I suggest to let that run it's course. -- Koffieyahoo 02:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy 

message: Please find a source and some context for this fact (who/what is Guts?), and then integrate it into an appropriate section. Thanks, --NickPenguin(contribs) 01:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this trivia fact?

message: This article as well as Berserk Forces have been tagged for merge, does anyone have any ideas on a merge target? If no merge target can be thought of these articles should get more references to stand alone. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Monk (soundtrack)

message: Reproducing the annotated track list in its entirety seems beyond fair use to me.  Can anybody persuade me that it is not copyvio? —Theo  (Talk) 15:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Category talk:Culture of Malaysia

message: This category needs to be merged with the Malay culture category. I vote for Malay as the better choice. (Hope I'm helping here, and not creating a stir.) The Editrix 16:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Malay and Malaysia are two different things. There are Malays in both Indonesia and Malaysia, even Philippines, Brunei, Thailand and a bit of South Africa and Madagascar (sp?). __earth (Talk) 03:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my talk page for discussion. The Editrix 18:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Glenbard North High School

message: Certian images have been removed by me because they have been added to a category that makes them speediable, most likely :Category:Images with no copyright tag. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 16:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed image(s)

message: Is the letter from the principal in the Recent events section really necessary? —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb ) 01:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letter from principal 

message: Apparently, some (emphasis, some) of what the anonymous posters have been writing about an incident with Glenbard North is true, as reported here: 
While this is a reputable, neutral source, I'm not sure this constitutes encyclopedic information.  Had this incident escalated further and cost the team a trip to the semifinals, then this event may have had longer ranging remifications beyond just being a current event?? LonelyBeacon 03:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fremd incident
Category talk:Malay culture

message: This category needs to be merged with the Malaysian culture category. I vote for Malay as the better choice. The Editrix 16:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Malay and Malaysia are two different things. There are Malays in both Indonesia and Malaysia, even Philippines, Brunei, Thailand and a bit of South Africa and Madagascar (sp?). __earth (Talk) 03:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)