Talk:Maria Theresa of Austria-Este, Queen of Bavaria

message: Why did the Jacobite, recognize Theresa as Mary III of Scotland instead of Mary IV. After all there were Mary I of Soctland reign: 1542-67, Mary II of Scotland reign: 1689-94 , the pretender Mary III of Scotland AKA Princess Marie Beatrice of Savoy. AGAIN why not Mary IV? GoodDay 17:18, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why, Mary III of Scotland?

message: What is the point of the Jacobite succession anyway when it recognizes Mary II of England and Scotland (and by extrapolation also William III / II), the very persons who replaces James II / VII in the first place? She should clearly be Mary III (of both England and Scotland...) Gerard von Hebel (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Mary IV of England? 

message: Didn't she claim Modena and headship of the house of Austria-Este following the dying out of that house in the male line in 1875? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modena. 

message: "Under the terms of the Sophia Naturalization Act 1705, the Electress Sophia and all "issue of her body" were declared to be natural-born British subjects, regardless of the actual place of their birth, unless they were Roman Catholics. The 1705 Act was not repealed until 1948 and, consequently, Maria Theresa would have been covered by its provisions."
Maria Theresa was Catholic, so how was she a "natural born British subject," according to this? This says that all descendants of Sophia EXCEPT Catholics, which Maria Theresa was. 76.202.192.102 (talk) 01:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacobite Succession 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  00:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per nominator.  Killuminator (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment I already voted but any move ideas for Archduchess Maria Theresa of Austria-Este (1817–1886)? Her husband's page uses the comital title in the name of the article.  Killuminator (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support The inclusion of their titles makes the names more defining, compared to mere numbers and dates. And as the nominator stated the format "[Maiden Name], Queen of [Place]" is already in use for various articles. Other examples are Maria Komnene, Queen of Hungary, Marie of Brabant, Queen of France, Marie of Lusignan, Queen of Aragon, Marie of Luxembourg, Queen of France, Maria of Portugal, Queen of Castile, Maria of Aragon, Queen of Castile, Maria of Serbia, Queen of Bosnia, Maria of Aragon, Queen of Portugal, Mary Tudor, Queen of France, Elizabeth of Sicily, Queen of Hungary, Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia, Elisabeth of Austria, Queen of France, Elisabeth of Bavaria, Queen of Germany, Elisabeth of Carinthia, Queen of the Romans, Elizabeth of Hungary, Queen of Serbia, etc. Keivan.fTalk 21:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2023