Talk:Commentary (magazine)

message: The magazine's official name is one word: Commentary.  In theory, this entry should be redirected to an entry called "Commentary."  And all references in the article to "Commentary Magazine" should be changed to either "Commentary" or "Commentary magazine" (with a small "m"). --68.198.233.112 02:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I'm moving the article from Commentary Magazine to Commentary (magazine). JamesMLane t c 22:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: I object to the pejorative term “neoconservative” to describe Commentary. The term “neoconservative,” unfortunately, has been used as a code-word for Jews. Those who use the term “neoconservative,” use it shield an anti-Jewish bias, in that they claim to not have hostility to Jews but only to neoconservatives; and this article further connects Jews to this much maligned political persuasion; since Commentary is a publication of the American Jewish Committee.
The two references to Commentary as being a “neoconservative” publication are hostile to both Commentary and neoconservatives; without clearly defining “neoconservativism” and what relation, if any, such a political persuasion has to Jews, Jewish culture, and Jewish American concerns.
Anti-neoconservative rhetoric appears very similar to anti-Zionist rhetoric in that hostility to both neoconservatism and Zionism are a cover for antisemitism.
--Lance6968 21:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On its own website it claims to be "the flagship of neoconservatism".  Meowy 23:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the Designation "Neoconservative" 

message: :Image:Commentary.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Commentary.jpg

message: This is a virtually non-sensical comment. Harper's is generally regarded as the flag-bearing publication of the literary, intellectual left. Recently, for instance, they published excepts from the marginalia found in a copy of Emerson's essays written by John Locke. Anything more academic would have to contain equations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:81E0:AA01:5814:5F3A:BE74:87C9 (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More scholarly... than Harper's? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Commentary (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080829130705/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/what-does-reform-judaism-stand-for--11393 to http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/what-does-reform-judaism-stand-for--11393
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Was a man named Gary Rosen ever Commentary's editor? --Uncle Ed (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Former editor

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Commentary (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061225081010/http://www.americanjewisharchives.org/aja/journal/index05.html to http://www.americanjewisharchives.org/aja/journal/index05.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311023304/http://www.vmbooksusa.com/acatalog/Forthcoming_Titles.html to http://www.vmbooksusa.com/acatalog/Forthcoming_Titles.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Commentary (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312131600/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/search/ to http://www.commentarymagazine.com/search/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I removed the long list of contributors to cut down on cruft. 
Because it may have some use outside this article context, such as addition to Wikidata or a relevant standalone list, I am noting the diff here for reference and convenience. Freelance-frank (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the discussion above from a decade ago, perhaps it should be remade in particular as a category. Freelance-frank (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of contributors removed, noted for reference