lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paper Money

message: As far as notability, I would have to put it down as a major album release. All star cast, and all that. I left the one tag on it though, because it invites expansion (usually a good thing), but the stub tag is prettier IMO! Questions, comments, ideas? Hamster Sandwich 08:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The track list of this Montrose album is also different from the track list of the copy I have. Gringo300 01:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: different track list

message: hi. paper money should point to BANKNOTE with a "for the band, 'paper money'" go here note rather than the other way around as it currently is.
Cramyourspam (talk) 12:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "paper money" should point to "banknote" not this  

message: All of the sidebar dates are 1943 or 1947... is this a bug? Jimbohamilton (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates from the 1940s for release dates?
Talk:Prince Randian

message: This page appears to violate the copyright of the Web page at http://www.missinglinkclassichorror.co.uk/freaksnattxt.htm, having been copied directly from that page.--Chuckhoffmann 09:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation 

message: It does indeed seem that this article was merely copied and pasted from a website and therefore violates copyright. In light of this I shall accept the challenge of revising the article and bring it up to the proper standards. Kingofspades 10:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: This guy isn't American... he appeared in an American movie.  I don't think that qualifies him as an American actor---otherwise Ben Kingsley, for instance, would be an American actor. dbw 15:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American actor? 

message: Is there an official transcript out there somewhere? I've read at least three versions of what Randian is supposed to be saying and none of them are convincing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.237.2 (talk) 15:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randian's line in "Freaks"
Talk:Generalized phrase structure grammar

message: Do you have worksheets on editing grammar and writing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.118.208 (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Both external links ("Gerald Gazdar's homepage, containing links to publications on GPSG." and "Generalised Phrase Structure Grammar page at University of Sussex") now take one to the general "Department of Informatics" page at the University of Sussex' website. Perhaps these should be removed or reworked.
Jim Carnicelli (talk) 02:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm replacing the broken links with more up-to-date ones --Gottoben (talk) 23:14, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken external links 

message: Provided brief descriptions of the concepts brought up in the introductory paragraph in order to aid non-experts in understanding GPSG's nature. Gottoben (talk) 23:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical Explanations
Category talk:Integrated circuits

message: There is too much overlap between these categories. It needs to be reorganized somehow. Perhaps create :Category: Digital integrated circuits (or :Category: Digital chips), and make it a subcat of :Category: Digital electronics. I don't know. Mirror Vax 10:20, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap with [[:Category: Digital electronics]] 

message: It would be very helpful for someone who has a schematic or something but doesn't know the name of a device to have a symbolic index consisting of the symbolic representation of devices such as logic gates and opamps as jpegs or something that links to the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.92.144.65 (talk) 19:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbolic index
Talk:Papal fanon

message: Ithillion 03:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I find it ironic that Fanon redirects to this page. 76.21.231.169 (talk) 01:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanon 
Talk:Ernst Home Centers

message: Not many facts about Ernst are out there.
At one point it was owned by Pay n Save (which is why strip malls often included both a Pay n Save and an Ernst, as well as the fact that they had nearly identical logos.) Tuxmelvin 11:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Demons and Wizards (Uriah Heep album)

message: Should be changed from "Demons & Wizards" --> "Demons and Wizards". As can be seen in the album cover, it is "and", not "&". Diamon 16:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Wikipedia says: "Demons & Wizards was remastered and reissued in 1995 with three bonus tracks" but there are 4 tracks listed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.247.237 (talk) 04:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 = 4???
Talk:BusTech

message: The proper name is BusTech (2005/2006 Gold Coast White Pages) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.26.76.30 (talk • contribs) 
However, Bustech is the term commonly used everywhere else e.g. in common parlance on BusAustralia.com and on the Gold Coast City Council website. SM247 03:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bustech name

message: The reasons to remove Busabout Wagga Wagga makes no sense, Busabout (Hoxton Park) and Busabout Wagga Wagga are owned by the same parent company (as is Interline Bus Services) but are totally different from one another, the same applies to other groups (such as Veolia Transport, Transit Australia Group and Pulitano Group). If one is to be removed them the same should be done to the others. Bidgee (talk) 05:39, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groups 

message: The file :File:Bustech logo only.png, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Bustech logo only.png. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 09:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Themeparkgc  Talk  23:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Bustech logo only.png]]
Talk:Tracking software

message: SpectorSoft 12:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: To my knowledge of Wikipedia policies, ad links are not acceptable anywhere. I'll check it out the other pages for you Archer7 12:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed the ad link from 'spy software' (which was also a page advertising some SpectorSoft software), however I was unable to find any ad links in the 'keystroke logging' article.
Archer7 12:58, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: tracking software not necessarily spy (or mal) ware

message: What do you think about merging this with Computer surveillance? Archer7 23:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that computer surveillance is a wider topic than tracking software (eg, acoustic tracking of key strokes or CPU noises, EMI detection, etc in addition to installed software on a machine). But, tracking software is a sufficiently large topic (in the US, some large fraction of businesses (was 30% a couple of years ago, last estimate I heard is about 75% more recently) use such software to watch their employees; some law enforcement agencies -- in US and elsewhere -- use such software, ...), that it deserves more than just a section in the computer surveillance article. In fact, this article should be, I think, considerably expanded. I can contribute the tidbit (from New York magazine, in Dec ?92?) that Bloomberg News -- major financial data producer / distributor -- uses employee surveillance software to watch every keystroke produced. ww 15:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Search on other names: Secret Monitor Software and Computer Monitoring Software. Mion 17:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  other names 

message: you're right, the other article is more about surveillance from the outside/the internet.
you can make this one about  surveillance on a single computer or a local network. Mion 17:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge second choice 

message: The title is actually wrong.
Tracking, like in Trace or Track, google for it, is about tracing the location, bij following the IP routing. Like with the software Visual Route. Mion 17:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. The term is used in this sense, however oddly according ot the dictionaries. There may be a better title, but a few minutes of thought turns up nothing that isn't even more awkward. We an live with this, I think. ww 17:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tracking" 

message: I completed the merge to Computer surveillance, that seemed like the favorite choice above.  Jeepday (talk) 00:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Editors at the destination didn't want the content. Reverted, this is now a disambiguation. Wbm1058 (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Hemp for Victory

message: The article claims that two VHS copies of the original film were recovered and donated to the Library of Congress on May 19, 1989.  I'm guessing here (because the date sounds right) but does anyone know if Jack Herer was the donor? --Viriditas 11:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Accordint to the toatse.com article it links, Maria Farrow, Carl Packard, and Jack Herer (who is the author of the very toatse article) donated it. Added to the article. --ThrashedParanoid 23:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Archival film copies

message: The current YouTube link has problems with audio and video synchronization.
This version contains closed captions and an interactive trancript. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZLC0f-C3PI
I believe it has merit but should not post it as I am the creator.
Please evaluate. Thanks CartoonChick (talk) 00:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: This is just an obscure PD film, and the only sources used in the article seem to either be passing mentions of some other topic or unreliable. At best it rates brief mention in the Hemp article, but there doesn't seem to be any reason for it to have its own article. It's like documenting one specific crack in a sidewalk or your great-grandmother's shirt that happens to be one of the random things in a box in the Smithsonian's basements. 2601:840:8080:4B10:AC73:776A:C945:D4B2 (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does this rate as notable?
Talk:Malice aforethought

message: Tried to clarify the meaning of Malice Aforethought in the United States HeatherB814 (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Damnation and a Day

message: I've just noticed, on the credits in the CD insert, that it says "All tracks shitten by Cradle Of Filth 2002" as opposed to written. Not that its of any real importance, but its an amusing fact. Balthazar (talk) 22:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it's a typo - this is the kind of black humour Dani and the other band members use in every album. For example, in Nymphetamine, they say that the chorus' and such are "choral sex". ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 23:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD insert typo 

message: Does anyone know where this album stood on the top 200, or if it even made it into the 200? This information should be on the album page..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.32.237 (talk) 20:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Deput 

message: "Madame Slam – Fellation"
What the hell?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.245.165 (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fellation 
Talk:Kingswood, South Gloucestershire

message: Recent additions by 82.46.107.109 appear well intentioned but very POV. If others broadly agree it may be best to revert and invite a more neutral addition! Linuxlad 13:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The information at [] looks credible, if lacking citations. William Avery 18:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I grew up there and looks mostly right to me. Will be tricky to get online citations for this tho - maybe would need to be cited to local history books, if anyone can find the time do to such a thing! 86.21.0.89 11:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History & Origin of name

message: We appear to have lost most of the entry on this (bad edit?). I had always understood that the mines were the reason for Kingswood's existence! Can someone knowledgeable please re-instate. Bob aka Linuxlad 15:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coal Mining

message: I have added stuff about H.H. & S. Budgett. I hope that's OK. For verifiability and notability please see H.H. & S. Budgett and Samuel Budgett. Budhen (talk) 20:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  H.H. & S. Budgett 
Talk:Left Hand Path (album)

message: i changed what the OP said was the HM-1, to the HM-2. there is no such pedal as the HM-1.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.105.93 (talk) 12:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: change to the boss pedals

message: Link: .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:7F7:A593:A4A0:0:0:0:4 (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The 100 Greatest Metal Albums of All Time - 82. Entombed, 'Left Hand Path' (1990)

message: Link: .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:7F7:A593:A4A0:0:0:0:4 (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: DECIBEL Hall of Fame #7 - The making of Entombed’s Left Hand Path
Talk:History of computer science

message: I have removed the:
"This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (September 2013)"
It is 10 years old and updates and anti-vandal actions have been done. Does another editor think that it should remain?BlueWren0123 (talk) 10:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update request removed 

message: Why do I keep seeing this same exact line "The castle clock, a hydropowered mechanical astronomical clock invented by Al-Jazari in 1206, was the first programmable analog computer.[10][11][12]" posted on all the major computing history Wikipedia articles? For starters, I believe the claim is a bit sensationalized, as the word "programmable" is being used very loosely here. The term programmable is usually meant in the context of being able to provide instructions to a machine so that the machine can adjust its operations accordingly. In this scenario for Al-Jazari's clock (also very loosely associated with a computer, but it performs a computation of sorts, namely, keeping time and such, so I will grant that I suppose), the clock had to be manually recalibrated. Does this qualify as programmable? In addition to this, the actual cited source isn't even correct. The episode in question of Ancient Discoveries of the History Channel is Series 3 Episode 9, and the episode itself (available on YouTube) doesn't even support the claim that Al-Jazari's clock was the first programmable analog computer. The episode actually makes an even stranger claim: that Al-Jazari's clock was a "super computer". I also looked through source 11 and didn't find the claim supported on the page given. What is going on here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:82:200:8b20::3c04 (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First programmable analog computer?
Talk:Scum (Napalm Death album)

message: The hidden tracks are not on the original lp.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.16.116 (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden tracks 

message: At ~10 minutes and forward, Justin talks a lot about Scum https://soundcloud.com/ra-exchange/ra-exchange-406 CelestialWeevil (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source from Broadrick
Talk:Point Iroquois Light

message: The sources I checked show that the map coordinates I provided are correct, except that they put the lighthouse in Lake Superior.  If you can find better coordinates please replace mine....Asher196 (talk) 04:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: NPS Inventory of historic lights says tower is 65 feet tall and focal plane is 68 feet.  Terry Pepper says focal plane is 72 feet.  I went with the larger figure in the info box, but somebody should give this more thought.  I did not check out the Coast Guard site.  Now I did, and it says nothing about the height. terry Pepper says the tower is 65 feet tall, and the focal plane is 72 feet (on the current tower, wcich is the second on this site).   I also did not know how to show the tower height and the focal plane, and consequently the meters rating look like this is less than one meter tall.  65/72 of a meter, which isn't what we want.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Focal Plane
Talk:Q TV

message: Does Q TV have a website? www.q-tv.co.uk is under construction. smurrayinchester(User), (Ho Ho Ho!) 12:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:South Kenton

message: Although there is a South Kenton and Preston Park residents associatin, South Kenton only really exists for the purposes of estate agents, being known as just part of North Wembley by the post office and not being named at all on the 1:25,000 Ordnance Survey map.   Kenton itself is much more upmarket than Wembley, hence the preference.  (On talk page because unsourced and POV, but then the main page is unsourced) --David Woolley 12:20, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really just an estate agent's concept
Talk:Norwegian royal family

message: From Talk:Haakon VII of Norway
I have read that the current royal family has a (twisty) bloodline back to Harald Fairhair and the House of Yngling. Can anybody shed some light on this? Inge
Basically true. The problems in one of the lines are whether Sverre was son of king Sigurd, and whether Harald Gille was son of king Magnus Barefoot. As they were alleged bastards coming from "nowhere" and won the kingdom. All other sirings are assured in normal certainty.
However, as descendant of Wulfhild of Norway, who married the Billung Duke of Saxony, they are descendants of Olav II and as such, recognizedly of Harald Fairhair. That is the clearest line. 23:28, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geneaology 

message: The drawing in the article is not one used by the Royal family: See the official site http://www.royalcourt.no/. The drawing in the article is copying an old Danish encyclopedia and never used by the Norwegian Royal Family, so I recommend to change it to one that is more like the actually used coat of arms.Hans Cappelen (talk) 12:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Coat of Arms 

message: I have replaced the long form House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg with the House of Glücksburg as that's what the English version of the website of the royal family states (https://www.royalcourt.no/seksjon.html?tid=27680&sek=27269 - but also in the Norwegian version https://www.kongehuset.no/historie.html?tid=27207&sek=26942 although as the "the princely family Glücksburg"). When Prince Carl of Denmark ascended to the Norwegian throne in 1905 the Danish royal family was using the form Glücksborg (the form with -borg was used from around 1850 and became official by being used in the 1853 Act of Succession that made the later Christian IX heir to the throne, as Slesvig-Holsteen-Sønderborg-Glücksborg). The Slesvig-Holsteen-Sønderborg part then disapered after 1863 and they simply became known as the House of Glücksborg. I assume it's the Norwegian preference for using native names that means the     -burg form is used (and pre-1940 Norway would also have been less anti-German than pre-1940 Denmark, although the occupation changed that). But I have seen no evidence they use Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, which would be rather odd. Prince Carl was culturally and linguistically Danish as was his father Frederick VIII. And his mother Louise of Sweden was deliberately chosen to avoid a German Princess becoming Queen. So it's unlikely the German version of the long form would have been preferred by Carl.--Batmacumba (talk) 13:50, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: : I see Nukualofa changed it to red. Thanks. Johndavies837 (talk) 06:38, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ari Behn
Talk:Competition Commission

message: Why is there only one Monopolies Commision?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.120.173 (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh, you beat me to it. Would you believe that I came here just for that? 12.157.120.212 (talk) 05:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Punti–Hakka Clan Wars

message: While it is quite true that there were many conflicts between Min Nam people and Hakka, the topic of Punti-Hakka Clan Wars is limited to describe the bloody conflict in Kwangtung, especially, in the Pearl River Delta, in Sze Yup, in Taishan in 19th century. Some described the war with causalty of 20,000,000.  It is no good to hijack the term to describe something beyond it.  HenryLi 12:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So many things wrong with this page....It's too late now to start fixing it. I'm not in college or getting paid, so someone else is most likely to alter it. I'm unpaid, so go to hell if you want the truth for free. Not happening.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.151.139.15 (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  guess somebody has to clean this up... 

message: I think the Chinese name for this conflict sums up the situation. Note the term 土 and not "Punti" is used. 土 refers to rustic peoples, who are hot-headed, refusing to listen to reason, who are bullies and prone to using violence, eg 土匪, 土皇帝. It is easy to see who the aggressors were. 213.1.15.144 (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  土客械斗 
Talk:Faith (character)

message: I'm not sure why this article was created in the first place, since the article Faith (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) has existed for quite some time already. Faith (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) also has better structure and a title that goes with the (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) suffix convention for Buffy articles. Maver1ck 12:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Please make a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buffy#Faith (character) v Faith (Buffy the Vampire Slayer) rather than having an edit war. Comment THERE, not HERE, and once we have consensus, we'll do whatever needs to be done. In the meantime, feel free to continue making  good faith edits to the content of this page. pfctdayelise 14:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name and page moves