Talk:SS Suevic

message: The line "The RNLI continue to perpetuate a myth that there was dense fog AND a strong gale simultaneously. This, of course, is impossible." seems both partial and unverified, representing an opinion as well as accusing the RNLI of deliberate falsehood. Surely this should be amended or removed to maintain the article's status as a Good Article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:B639:8D01:E002:7E80:2535:D71B (talk) 02:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes removed the sentence. G-13114 (talk) 16:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Firstly, good work on a useful and interesting article.  Here are my comments post-review with GA in mind.
:Thanks. Responses interspersed below in green. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 01:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, there you have it. Hope I've met your concerns, but if there are others, I'd be happy to work up changes for them as well. Cheers, and many thanks for the review! AKRadeckiSpeaketh 01:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work, I'm happy to promote to WP:GA immediately.  All the best. The Rambling Man 07:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review comments 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I had to consider this for a while, as many of the sources in this article are not from sources that necessarily qualify under WP:RS. In the end however I have decided to pass it. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 10:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: Skytteren, som ligger på botten       
  utanför Lysekil, är Sveriges miljö-   
  farligaste vrak.                      
                                        
  Det kommer en riskanalys från Chalmers
  som presenteras på torsdag att visa,  
  skriver Bohusläningen.                
                                        
  När fartyget sjönk 1942 fanns 500     
  kubikmeter olja ombord, och den läcker
  fortfarande ut. Hur mycket som finns  
  kvar i dag vet man inte.
That's in swedish (from SVT Text). Hopefully somebody can add in some english text and a proper reference. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.34.175 (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden's biggest environmental hazard 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on SS Suevic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518213251/http://www.rnli.org.uk/assets/news/National/2007/March/Suevic%20article%20from%20The%20Lifeboat%201907.pdf to http://www.rnli.org.uk/assets/news/National/2007/March/Suevic%20article%20from%20The%20Lifeboat%201907.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031150109/http://lizard-lifeboat.co.uk/pages/S.S-Suevic/front-page.htm to http://www.lizard-lifeboat.co.uk/pages/S.S-Suevic/front-page.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified