lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Isotopes of lutetium

message: There are two problems here. The first is that 176Lu has a high spin of 7−, while its decay product 176Hf has a spin of 0+ like all even-even nuclei. The second is that, while 176Hf has low-energy excited states with spins 6+ and 8+ that 176Lu could decay to (these are only first-forbidden), the spin of 176Lu is intrinsic while those of these excited states of 176Hf are due to collective nuclear rotation, which results in a terrible match. Much the same thing happens with 236Np, though I imagine its half-life is a lot shorter because alpha decay to 232Pa is also possible for it. Double sharp (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not exactly for 236Np: its alpha decay branching ratio is only 0.16%. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

text: A more appropriate analogue would be 248Bk, whose 6+ spin is intrinsic while the 6+ spin of 248Cf is due to collective nuclear rotation. 129.104.241.193 (talk) 13:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

text: In any case, the longevity of 176Lu has quite different machanism compared with other known non-beta-stable nuclides with beta half-life at least 1010 years. 2A01:E34:EC74:7170:C92D:3550:651:9FE3 (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why lutetium-176 is so stable 

message: According to the Geiger-Nuttall law, 152Lu (N = 81) should have a partial alpha decay half-life at the order of 108 years, corresponding to an alpha decay probability at the order of 10-15%. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>152</sup>Lu
Talk:Pound

message: The move request was not fulfilled, due to a lack of consensus for it. However, I did run a bot to change links to Pound to the new Pound (weight), so that ought to clean up something. Rob Church Talk 11:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome

message: Why is the abbrerviation for pound LBS ? What does LBS have to do with the measurement of weight (or amount of force)
:The abbreviations for pound and for pounds, singular and plural, are both lb; lbs is wrong for both. - Post169 16:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Comes from latin libra  Nobody Ent 18:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  abbreviation 

message: Pound is not used to measure mass or weight, only mass; weight is measured in Newtons or Poundals. Pseudoanonymous 21:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pound 

message: :The subject of “mass vs. weight” is currently being discussed at Talk:Kilogram: Location for “Mass versus weight”. A consensus has been so far achieved that the section Kilogram#Mass versus weight should be moved out of Kilogram. Consideration is being given as to where to move it to. Options are to move it to Mass, or to Weight, or to give it its own article, Mass versus weight that all other articles can link to. If you would like to express an opinion on this matter, please click here. Greg L (my talk) 22:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: “Mass versus weight” article
Talk:Isotopes of hafnium

message: I'm new at this editing thing so I'll just point it out in this talk page since I don't see why Hf-182 has a tag of potentially appearing in trace amounts. First of all, it isn't the only isotope that it's a theoretical decay product. Second, W-186 has a predicted alpha half life in excess of 1E50 years, much greater than its double decay half life or the half life of Hf-182. There's no way any detectable quantity of this isotope would be the result of this alpha decay. It's pretty useless to consider an occurence of less than a single atom on Earth as a trace. Crackhorace 10:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redudant note for Hf-182 

message: According to , the alpha decay partial half-life of 154Hf should be at the order of 107 years, making its alpha decay possibility approximately 6.17×10-13%. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>154</sup>Hf 

message: according to  the projected half-life of 176Hf and 177Hf is about 10^20 to 10^22 years, hus their decay can be discovered by current method Cristiano Toàn (talk) 07:35, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible observed alpha decay of <sup>176</sup>Hf, <sup>177</sup>Hf
Talk:Isotopes of tungsten

message: 74W tungsten has 5 stable or almost stable consisting of the 4 EE isotopes 180, 182, 184, and 186, which are grouped around the also stable isotope EO74W183. However the stability profile of 74W tungsten is made irregular by the reported half-lifetime value of EO74W197 of only 38 minutes (log second =3.36). This is below the comparable half-lifes of the adjacent isotopes EO74W177 (2.21 hours) and EO74181 (121 days) and thus distorts the EO stability isotope profile of 74W tungsten.WFPM (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Half-life of EO74W179 Tungsten

message: According to , 179W and 181W should have a partial alpha decay half-life of least 1013 years and 1022 years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.104.241.214 (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>179</sup>W and <sup>181</sup>W
Talk:Isotopes of rhenium

message: The half-life of OO75Rh180 is low in comparison to the stability trend line through its immediate OO neighbors, with OO75Rh182 being 17.7 hours, OO75Rh180 reported as 2.45 minutes, and OO75Rh178 as 13.2 minutes, which distorts the OO stability trend line profile for this element.WFPM (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Half-life of OO75Rh180 Rhenium

message: According to , 185Re should have an alpha decay half-life at the order of 1024 years. Adding one more proton would reduce alpha stability by nine orders of magnitude. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 20:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that this is the same order as 128Te, perhaps rhenium has a good chance to be the next primordial radioactive element that all the pedants will mention after bismuth. (Not sure how long it would take to find that out, though.) Double sharp (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I have made a calculation error: the geometric mean of the three values in the table should actually be at the order of 1025 years. 129.104.65.7 (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Cristiano Toàn (talk) 10:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>185</sup>Re 

message: 183Re has slightly lower alpha-decay energy than 185Re (2.12 MeV vs 2.19 MeV), so its alpha-decay half-life should be at the order of 1025 years. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>183</sup>Re
Talk:Bobby Williamson

message: It was actually about Kilmarnock fans that Bobby made the comment about wanting entertainment go to the cinema instead. As a killie fan spending money each week to go and see his "exciting" brand of football that did piss me off slightly.
But all credit to him he won us the scottish cup and brought European football back to Rugby Park
:everybody is welcome to edit Wikipedia pages. You are encouraged to change content where it is wrong or you can improve it. You can do that by clicking 'edit this page' and removing anything that's wrong or shouldn't be there, or in this case just correcting Hibs to Kilmarnock.<BR>SimonMayer 13:30, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: (No subject)
Talk:Isotopes of iridium

message: Should it be noted, according to this article , that 193Ir is predicted to undergo bound-state β- decay (which has not been observed)? 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible bound-state β- decay of <sup>193</sup>Ir 

message: According to , 191Ir should have an alpha decay half-life at the order of 1028 years, so there is basically no chance to observe its decay. Among three odd Z elements Eu, Ir and Tl with two beta-stable isotopes in the sixth period, only the lighter isotope of Eu has short enongh alpha decay half-life to show the decay. 129.104.65.7 (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha half-life of <sup>191</sup>Ir
Talk:Tunnock's

message: I removed:
:The Caramel Wafer was first released as a confection in 1962 after being suggested by the head of confection design, Alan Russell. Russell, now retired and living in the West Midlands, had the idea of a caramel and wafer chcocolate bar after being offered a similar sweet during a trip to China in the late 1950's. The Caramel Wafer won Alan Russell the prestigious 'new confection of the year' award in 1963. He also went on to be instrumental in the release of other brands of wafer over the following fifteen years, which are still available today - most notably the caramel log (a coconut topped caramel wafer) and the orange wafer where the caramel was replaced with an orange fondant. His most notable failure was that he never successfully fused the tastes of caramel and liquorice, although he spends much of his time in retirement still pursuing this goal via his still close links to the factory and the Tunnock family.
Is there a source for this please? Grinner 13:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I removed the following:
:The company revealed that as of 2006, Andrew Barringer, the captain of Hardly Athletic, would become the face of the Tunnock's advertising campaign due to be screened that in the year. Barringer new face of Tunnock's
Further down the forum the original author admits that his contract states: "pissing about making up shit on the internet is approved and activley encouraged between 9am and 5.30pm". Hardly Athletic are not the face of Tunnocks. Grinner 14:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hardly Athletic

message: Should the Tennock's teacakes be described on this page, on the Krembo page, or on a page of its own? --Twid 18:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think on this page, Tunnock's make them, after all. Apau98 (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Krembo

message: I extended the description of the Snowball, added in "with the addition of coconut to the exterior of a soft chocolate shell but with no biscuit base." Of course I'm an amateur to this site, so feel free to change it. I just felt that a bit more description was needed.--Captain Capatilism 15:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Snowball

message: What exactly is meant by this sentence? What is infamous about the Tunnock's Boy? Zacwill16 (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The infamous face of Tunnock's Boy"
Talk:Isotopes of platinum

message: There is a column on the right entitled "Range of natural variation" with no items in it.
This is idiotic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.7.176 (talk) 13:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In the article Isotopes of copper, some numbers do appear in the column on the right, for the two stable isotopes of copper.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.109.117 (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Column 

message: 195Pt is the only beta-stable nuclide with odd mass number such that N:Z = 3:2. 5n2nX is beta-stable for n = 1, 26, even numbers from 30 to 46 and 39 (not primordial for n = 1 or even numbers from 42 to 46). Cristiano Toàn (talk) 08:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also for 42 and 44 :) 129.104.241.242 (talk) 02:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The only beta-stable nuclide of odd mass number with ''N''/''Z'' = 1.5 

message: Could anyone please give some reference of the bound-state β− decay of 195Pt to 195Au, of which, unlike in the cases of 163Dy and 205Tl, I can't find any? 129.104.241.214 (talk) 23:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bound-state β− decay of <sup>195</sup>Pt: reference required? 

message: proposes a half-life of 4.97(16)×1011 years, 4.49(5)×1011 years in , 3.9(3)×1011 years in  and 3.7(3)×1011 years years in . Note that a precise determination of half-life of 190Pt is essential in radioisotopic age determination of some ores and meteorites. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 13:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: NUBASE2020 lists a half-life of , so we will go with that one. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half-life of <sup>190</sup>Pt in dispute
Talk:Isotopes of gold

message: I have grouped the 3 non-table, non-footer sections together because they all discuss the same isotope, 198Au. I am also proposing that the combined section be split off into a separate article, Gold-198, because 198Au appears to be independently notable, e.g. . –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:37, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a good idea. Enough references in the section. While you are at it, could you expand the medicine application part? I'm missing the explicit compound used in med. -DePiep (talk) 16:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  It seems to pass WP:GNG; I created the article. Now, it needs expansion from the many sources that refer to it. ComplexRational (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal 

message: 206Au is potentially capable of alpha decay. Note that the alpha decay energy is only 136.7 keV. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 11:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>206</sup>Au
Talk:Isotopes of mercury

message: It should be noted in the chart that 204Hg has the highest N/Z ratio of any known stable isotope at 1.55 (mentioned in the Wikipedia article Neutron–proton ratio). 216Po has even higher N/Z ratio than 204Hg, but it is very unstable with respect to alpha decay, with a half-life of only 145 ms. 2A04:CEC0:11CD:6609:1C53:ACAC:ED4F:9F39 (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If we're counting unstable isotopes, then probably a better comparison is 238U at 1.59. :) Double sharp (talk) 08:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutron–proton ratio of <sup>204</sup>Hg 

message: 203Hg through 206Hg are the only alpha-stable isotopes of mercury.
According to , 192Hg (N = 112) and 194Hg (N = 114) should respectively have a partial alpha decay half-life of at least 1011 years and 1018 years. Note that the alpha decay energy of 194Hg is 2.70 MeV, which is lower than 3.27 MeV of its alpha product 190Pt and 2.82 MeV of its double alpha product 186Os. Also 192Hg has lower alpha decay energy than its daughter 188Pt (3.38 MeV vs. 4.01 MeV).
According to , 196Hg should have an alpha decay half-life at the order of 1032 years. Note that the alpha decay energy is 2.038 MeV, which is lower than 2.4239 MeV of its alpha product 192Pt and 2.1432 MeV of its double alpha product 188Os.
The alpha decay energy of 207Hg is only 984.3 keV, so alpha decay may be possible but with a very long partial half-life beyond imagination.
According to the link above, 208Hg (decay energy = 2.4002 MeV), 210Hg and 212Hg should respectively have an alpha decay half-life at the order of 1022 years, 1026 years and 1027 years. The alpha decay partial half-life of 212Hg is 41 orders of magnitude longer than that of 212Po despite having an energy 36.0786 MeV higher. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 21:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of several isotopes of mercury
Talk:Isotopes of astatine

message: Decay process	QEC (keV)	Spin change
157Tb → 157Gd	60.052   	3/2+ → 3/2− (ΔJΔπ = 0−)
213At → 213Po	73.93    	9/2− → 9/2+ (ΔJΔπ = 0−)
Of course, considering its 125 ns half-life, observation of electron capture of 213At is infeasible (perhaps with a probability at the order of 10-15%). An upper limit of the branching ratio has not been determined, but the value is expected here to be < 2.5×10-12% (half-life > 57.87 d). 129.104.241.214 (talk) 22:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EC decay properties of <sup>213</sup>At somehow resemble <sup>157</sup>Tb 

message: See https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensnds/212/At/adopted.pdf and https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensnds/216/At/adopted.pdf. Neither beta mode for neither nuclide has been observed. 103.166.228.86 (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beta-decay branching ratio upper limits of <sup>212</sup>At and <sup>216</sup>At
Talk:Isotopes of radium

message: Radium is not an actinide. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 18:23, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See the footnote in the template. Radium indeed is not an actinide, but it occurs in the decay chains of thorium and uranium, and the listed isotopes ( and ) have half-lives several orders of magnitude than any of their daughters until stable lead. ComplexRational (talk) 18:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the actinides and fission products by decay chain thingy 

message: According to Cluster decay#Experiments, 221Fr and 221Ra are the nuclides with the lowest mass number that are known to undergo cluster decay (the page Isotopes of barium says that 114Ba is predicted to undergo cluster decay, but this is not observed). So I think this "lightest nuclide" property should be noted for one of 221Fr and 221Ra or both of them in the table of isotopes, like what has been done for 242Cm.
The known isotopes of radium that undergo cluster decay (221-224,226Ra) are all beta stable. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 00:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted for both of them. 221Fr has the lowest atomic number, and 221Ra is the lightest. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  <sup>221</sup>Fr and <sup>221</sup>Ra are the lightest known nuclide to undergo [[cluster decay]] 

message: NUBASE2020 says that the branching ratio of electron capture 216Ra is <1×10-8%, which means that the decay mode has never been observed, and an EC half-life not exceeding half an hour can be excluded. I do not think that we have a chance to observe the actual decay.
Decay process	QEC (keV)	Spin change                                	Half-life (a)
170Tm → 170Er	313.99   	1− → 0+ (ΔJΔπ = 1−, 1 forbidden non-unique)	268.74
216Ra → 216Fr	312.09   	0+ → 1− (ΔJΔπ = 1−, 1 forbidden non-unique)	?
129.104.241.214 (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electron capture of <sup>216</sup>Ra
Talk:Bogdan the Founder

message: Moldavia's capital were at Baia, Siret, Suceava and Iaşi. No other capitals. Please do not put wrong informations!--Dacodava
Calm down. I was the one to write Radauti. If you want to correct it, just do it. --Anittas 15:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Since you refuse to acknowledge the problem (and as I imagine if I remove that note you'll just put it back), I'll add other POVs in that, balancing the migrationist POV. I don't think due weight it will be fixed in this way (this article will have a huge footnote on a spurious identification), but it seems more neutral in that way and in the end it will move to an acceptable solution. Daizus (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  compromise ?
Talk:Isotopes of actinium

message: There is a section named "Actinides vs Fission Products", only containing a chart of actinides and fission products, by half life. I don't see the purpose of this chart, or the section. Is there some reason for this that I am unaware of? I intend to delete the chart, as it is already present on the page about nuclear waste. I5-X600K (talk) 02:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpose of the section "Actinides vs Fission Products"? 

message: Per this source it was reported in 1969, but still remained unconfirmed as of 2010. Double sharp (talk) 03:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this decay mode (as NUBASE2020 did not say "α?" for 228Ac); otherwise we have to list 224Fr as a trace isotope of francium in its page. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 09:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  <sup>228</sup>Ac alpha decay
Talk:Toyota NZ engine

message: Does anyone have valve timing info for the 1NZ-FE? It might be informative to put this side-by-side with that for the 1NZ-FXE, as it would illustrate exactly how the 1NZ-FXE is different, as well as providing a good example of a specific implementation of the Atkinson cycle,.
Here are the figures for the 1NZ-FXE (source: Prius NHW20 New Car Features):
Intake valve opening 	18° – −15° BTDC
Intake valve closing 	72° – 105° ABDC
Exhaust valve opening	34° BBDC
Exhaust valve closing	2° ATDC
Timing diagrams might be nice too.
The following was added:
:Production was stopped in 2009, at arrival of Prius III.
:In 2012, at arrival of Prius C (North-America), Prius Aqua (Japan), Yaris Hybrid (Europa), a new version occurs.
I'm having trouble interpreting what it means. I assume Prius III means the XW30 generation. Does 'new version' just mean the production line was restarted (with a gap from 2009 to 2012) or was it a new generation (with new mechanical features)?  Stepho  talk  09:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Valve timings
Talk:McMartin preschool trial

message: There were two trials as the article itself states.  Why is the article name in the singular?  It should be McMartin preschool trials. Robert Brockway (talk) 13:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The second trial was due to a hung jury being called the first time around on some of the charges directed at Ray Buckley. So they're treated as a single prosecution. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 11:55, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I wanted to know why there weren't 1. the map of the school that the FBI had. 2. The preliminary report about the tunnels.Page 47 and 48 Seahorse4418 (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been dealt with repeatedly, see the Archives. The FBI released everything given to them, including the nonsense files by the Finders that depict tunnels which subsequent investigations never found. They didn't exist. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 16:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures from the FBI file for the finders 

message: In the "Trials" section, the first source cited is "Lizard Tales: People and Events in the Life of a Naturalist". I don't have the ability to check every page but I did preview the book and I highly doubt it contains any information relevant to the article, much less the specific statement about the first trial lasting three years (which I doubt; maybe the case did, but the trial itself?)... Hoping someone with more knowledge about this matter can help verify or fix. Al Begamut (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trials - citation and claim wrong? 

message: The continued investigation part of the article contains misinformation on the searches for potential tunnels—misdating items found and how they might have gotten there. There is a fucking FBI paper on this, I understand the worries of people misusing information to support delusions, but putting in information that is easily proven false does not help this case. 50.107.89.49 (talk) 23:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The "tunnels" did not exist. The FBI paper you're referring to was not produced by the FBI, it was given to them by a man named Gary Stickel. No one was ever able to verify these supposed tunnels, so that paper itself was the misinformation. The FBI just dumped everything they had without comment, they weren't saying any of it was actually credible. This has been discussed before, you can see it in the Archives. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 17:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinformation
Talk:Gurinder Chadha

message: The final credits where the crew sings, dances and acts silly to music, is it a trademark or just a coincidence in the films I've seen?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.250.143.131 (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which film?  Jay (talk) 06:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: TrRademark