Talk:North American AJ Savage

message: I tried to add the following information in the specifications section:
*|max landing weight main=41,300 lb)
*|max landing weight alt=18,773 kg)
But apparently I don't understand how this template works (I thought I did).  Perhaps someone can add this for me.  Information verified at globalsecurity.org.  Erzahler 21:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated specs and references, see USN History reference. I believe Global Security is a mirror of Aeronautix.org, I avoid using it.LanceBarber (talk) 05:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template? 

message: The aero-web.org link is broken.  At least I could not get it to work.  My Firefox browser came back with an error stating it could not find the website.  I also tried the site's home page and still got the same result.  Someone might want to check on this. Erzahler (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 

message: I make a rule not to tweak Wikipedia pages except for blatant spelling errors, but I should point that the PDF referenced at the bottom
of the article gives AJ serial numbers, and the variant counts don't match the article -- counting through the serials gives me XAJ-1 == 3,
AJ-1 == 57, AJ-2 == 55, AJ-2P == 27 ... for a total of 142.  Now it's possible serials assigned to one variant were aircraft actually completed as another, but otherwise I haven't been able to make out consistent sense of production numbers between sources -- MrG 65.102.200.136 (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The bogus? part was that original source for the variant bit of the article had 124850/124864 as AJ-2s which gave 3/40/70/30(=143). Current sources and the USN site give that batch as AJ-1s which gives the 3/55/55/30(=143). None of the sources give any information on AJ-1s being converted to AJ-2s apart from a one liner on Baughers website. His list by serial number and Wooster's list have no mention of conversions. I think we need something more concrete to prove it. MilborneOne (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogus Production Numbers 

message: === Aircraft of equivalent etc === 
What sort of person added the Ryan FR Fireball to this list? Single engined, a third of the weight and so on. The only similarities are they are both carrier-capable and each has a single gas turbine engine. What is the rational in this aircraft's equivalence? If no one can say I will remove the entry before the end of August 2012. Lin (talk) 08:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, the connection at best, is tenuous. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also 

message: What sort of person added the Ryan FR Fireball to this list? Single engined, a third of the weight and so on. The only similarities are they are both carrier-capable and each has a single gas turbine engine. What is the rational in this aircraft's equivalence? If no one can say I will remove the entry before the end of August 2012. Lin (talk) 08:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, the connection at best, is tenuous. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft of equivalent etc 

message: What does the AJ stand for? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "AJ" means "Attack aircraft, North American Aviation, First design. See 1922 United States Navy aircraft designation system for a complete explanation. - BilCat (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym