lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:City (novel)

message: I seem to recall that Joe hit the anthill with a purpose only he could see at the time, not because of was tired of them. That single event acceleration the industrialization of the ants, and the monument repeated all over their building at the end is the celebration of that very moment.
But hey, I read that book as a kid and in French, so maybe something was lost.66.68.113.5 (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary Inacurracy?

message: Much is left out as well as much being added that is questionable.
It was not necessarily a kaleidoscope trick, and it was based upon the Juwain Philosophy, which isn't mentioned at all in the summary. The Mutants may have been tricky, but they certainly weren't tricksters. When something broke down, one would suddenly show up and fix it. They were helpful to mankind, sort of like race monitors. The kaleidoscope helped mankind to get what they wanted, for otherwise they would not have gone to Jupiter.
The present summary is slanted.--Neptunerover (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree; plot summary needs help
Talk:Wahkiakum County ferry

message: This is in :Category:Ferries in Oregon and also in the parent cat :Category:Ferries in the United States because it is also a ferry in Washingon but is not part of the ferry system at :Category:Washington State ferries. Katr67 20:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took care of this by creating :Category:Ferries in Washington. Katr67 (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note about categorization

message: Was this route formerly covered by a steamboat? Cool! That info should be added to the article. Katr67 (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steamboats cat? 

message: Anyone that can provide a history of the service, especially prior to 1962 (when the county took it over), should be encouraged to do so.
It should also be pointed out (if proper references are available) that the service operates free if there are road closures on WA 4, such as those due to landslides, which happen occasionally. In such instances, the service is subsidized by the State of Washington. I don't know if anything similar is used if portions of US 30 on the Oregon side ever become impassable. 76.21.8.213 (talk) 18:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The article states that this "is the last regularly scheduled car ferry to cross the Columbia River."
With qualifying statements, this might be true, but what about the Keller Ferry, Gifford-Inchelium Ferry, and the various ferries in British Columbia?
I believe that the intent may have been to say between Oregon and Washington, and I have corrected it as such. Feel free to help clarify this if you know anything about the subject. jr98664 (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't speak to the original intent, but your reasoning -- and the result -- seem sound to me. I've been in Portlnd for some time, and driven that stretch of the river many times...never heard of another ferry between OR and WA. Thanks for explaining. -Pete (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really the last ferry?
Talk:Millennium Church

message: re-added  tag - Where is the church, for example? :: Princess Tiswas 19:18, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned & re-wrote to make the article understandable, and to correct the grammar & spelling. - Tiswas(t/c) 14:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

message: there is no mention of the organ, neither its builder nor its description. 45.51.188.112 (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  organ
Talk:The Trials of Van Occupanther

message: I deleted the end part about how it evokes the feelings of some crappy movie. 
That's not fact and Wikipedia is not a review site.
Also a bit more "vocals are reminiscent..." this page is for facts about the album not your opinions or anyone else's. Move those to the discussion page. -- 207.119.11.232 18:18, 29 March 2007
:In the future, tag the article or section with  or  to give the contributor a chance to back up his/her claims with reliable and verifiable sources. Opinions can have their place here. Also, 81.109.68.155's contribution of the Laurel Canyon bit was probably not a reference to the film, but to the town and/or the Laurel Canyon "scene". -- Mattbrundage 14:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited

message: Roscoe is a song by Johnossi too, I don't know much about how to move/name pages on wiki, but just wanted to alert somebody who knows better than I. So, Roscoe (song) should be either this song or the Johnossi song, how can that be done? Fetma (talk) 21:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There appears to be no article yet for the Johnossi song. If it is created and deemed to be notable, then we will deal with the situation at that time. Mattbrundage (talk) 02:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnossi song
Talk:Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support as nom. --Samuel CurtisShinichian-Hirokian-- TALK·CONTRIBS 04:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support as nom. --Samuel CurtisShinichian-Hirokian-- TALK·CONTRIBS 04:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: :Add any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
Now what kind of stupid poll was that? Closing on the same day it opens. I don't like the move, considering the issue hasn't been delt with at I ♥ Huckabees, which probably has the highest profile of any of these types of articles. Not that I really care either way where the article is, I just don't like that there's no true consensus on the matter.--SeizureDog 10:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Laura Birn

message: The picture is not of Laura Birn but of Pamela Tola. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.254.148 (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Laura Birn IMDb , blue eyes. Pamela Tola IMDb , brown eyes. Peltimikko (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cambuslang railway station

message: I am not sure what this means. This is an extensive article, of which Cambuslang Station is a relatively little part. The article also links to many other sub articles on various aspects of Cambuslang - buildings, schooling, history etc. The station will be of special interest to some people but I would think the main article will always be Cambuslang. I suppose whoever is suggesting this merger thinks that railway stations might be a good way of organising some geographic aspects of Scotland, but this would mean, say, merging the Glasgow article with that for Glasgow Central Station. This does not seem to make much sense, so please do not merge these two articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony164 (talk • contribs) 
:I support User:Tony164 (who didn't sign the above comment) as above: the two are completely different articles. However I do believe that the section of the Cambuslang (town) article regarding the railway station should be deleted/moved to the Cambuslang railway station article and the section remaining linking to the railway station article. Anthøny 
:Happy to support moving Cambuslang Station section to join a separate article if the original writer of that article is happy. Tony164 15:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extensive article in need of work

message: Is it really appropriate to have a picture of a class 318 leaving Gourock? It has very little to do with Cambuslang itself.
::Agreed --Stewart 01:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be removed. Anyone who's really curious to know what a Class 318 looks like can always click on the wikilink to the article about those units. Signalhead 19:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stock

message: The town of cambuslang lies within the Greater Glasgow area within the local authority area of South Lanarkshire.
I state this with regard to the stations regional context. Notice I did not cvlaim Glasgow City (Council) but Greater Glasgow (Urban Area)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by George R. Allison (talk • contribs) 15:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your previous edit stated "town of Cambuslang, Glasgow in South Lanarkshire, Scotland." The link to the article about the City of Glasgow implies you were meaning Cambuslang was part of the city. You did not mention Greater Glasgow first time round. --Dreamer84 15:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regional Location
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Cancer dictionary

message: I'm working my way through removing some of the blue links that have built up and adding others. I have a question about Zheng as it relates to Cancer treatment. At the moment it's a link to a dab page - none of which are correct. I'll try to put together a stub but which Zheng are we talking about here? Zheng (jung) (identical spelling to the NCI definition) can be a type of zither . The identification of disease categories can be Bian zheng  or there are a couple of other varieties of Zheng to boot. ,  I'll try to work it out and work on it some. Paxse 10:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 4619 links at start - 4567 now. It takes a while to check each one. Paxse 13:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

text: 4375 links and the A's have been cleaned and checked. Paxse 10:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great work. One suggestion for checking the links easily: use popups. With that tool you can check each link in bery little time. --WS 22:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought you could probably use some help :) You seem to have been maintaining the list single handed for a looooooooooooooooong time. What a mammoth task! I'll keep at it when I can. Cheers, Paxse 17:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot to say thanks for the tip! Paxse 17:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zheng

message: I finally found an easy way to remove all blue links, using this tool. The list is down from 3133 to 1117 now! --WS (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed blue links
Talk:Ossian Donner

message: I've changed the reasons for Ossian Donner to leave Finnish civil service. The reason for resigning was according to sources I've read not the language issue but his criticism for the Russian actions during Finlands autonomy under Russian rule. Also, he did not resign, but was relieved of his duties since it strained the relationship to the Soviet union. After he was relieved he took British citizenship. The language issue might have existed, but it wasn't the reason for him leaving Finnish civil service.
Ostrobothnian 19:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Politics of Switzerland

message: I added in the other 3 federal courts (see left column at []):
Federal Insurance Court
Federal Criminal Court
Federal Administrative Court
If anyone speaks German, French, or Italian (the three official languages of Switzerland), please go to the website above and translate the page into English for those three other courts above.
Thanks
Weatherguy1033 19:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding the new courts to the template – although unfortunately the Federal Insurance Court of Switzerland will have to be rewritten in the past tense soon, as it's going be merged into the Supreme Court effective January 1, 2007. I'll take a look at the FCC as well once I have the time. Sandstein 05:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in adding the remaining Federal Courts 

message: For your information: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 7#Template:Politics of Swiss cantons.Quo'tis (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates for discussion 

message: Thanks for this excellent template! In the section 'Administrative divisions', what about adding two lines between 'Cantons' and 'Municipalities', as follows:
* Cantons
** Governments
** Parliaments
* Municipalities
Other suggestions:
* Add Neutrality between 'Foreign relations' and 'European Union'.
* Make the councils and courts as bullet lists (with the supreme court at level 1 and the others at level 2).
* Add Federal budget below 'Federal administration'.
* Add '(foreigners)' after 'Voting' (on the same line).
* Think of adding Law, if and where relevant.
Thanks for your help.Quo'tis (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantonal level
Talk:Barium carbonate

message: Should the Witherite page be merged with Barium carbonate?
128.54.160.135 (talk) 04:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i think this is an actor's name  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F390:2A00:D29:834B:AACF:3E32 (talk) 21:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  isn't he an actor
Talk:François Gaston de Lévis

message: * We should do the merging very soon.  Then, maybe I can re-nominate this and I will be able to get closer, as we will have a lot larger of an article and it will give so much more information.  I say we should merge on January 13.  Let's talk with the creater of the other article, because he/she may be against it!  Thank you very, very, very much for the merger topic!  District Attorney 01:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's merge very soon 
MediaWiki talk:Cite references link many format backlink labels/Archive1

message: A to dz is 130 cites, is there any chance of someone could raising the limit beyond 130? Maybe add ea to fz? --Dual Freq 19:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good idea. I've added an  tag so that an admin notices this. Tra (Talk) 20:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Gentgeen for adding these. Tra (Talk) 22:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could we get ia to lz? Thanks. I never expected to use all of the ones we've got, but here I am... I don't need all of these (at least, not yet), but it can't hurt to have a few extra. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 14:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. :) Somehow, I never knew about this page, before -- we learn something every day, eh? – Luna Santin (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the same source is being cited 338 times, possibly the <ref> tag isn't the best choice for citing it... --ais523 13:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found that having a large number of references to a single reference is particularly useful for lists with a reference for each entry, especially if a certain reference supports the inclusion of a large number of list entries. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 19:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Scratch that -- I'll still need some three-letter backlinks eventually. Someone the Person (talk) 02:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

text: More than a dozen or so backlinks starts to look ugly and is confusing. Consider the use of  for a reference used a large number of times. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  14:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 130?
Talk:Sharpless epoxidation

message: It's unclear to me what determines the entatioselectivity of the reaction. Can someone clarify that a bit? Even from his article on Organic Syntheses, I can't seem to make it out. He's producing a 2S, 3S product, but can you produce a 2R, 3R product and if so, how?
:It's the asymmetric environment of the diethyl tartrate.  I'll try to build on this article soon. ~K 20:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! Thanks for the nearly instantaneous response. And sorry for not signing my previous post. I suspected it was the DET but I wasn't sure. -- Pdavis68 20:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: This is often referred to as the Sharpless-Katsuki epoxidation, and I think Katsuki deserves a mention at least! Seansheep 15:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katsuki anyone?! 

message: When actually did sharpless publish his work on epoxidation reaction??? 105.58.212.96 (talk) 14:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Green Team (comics)

message: This line is tagged on to the end of the last paragraph of the character description:
"The Green Team consists of homosexual 13 year olds that occasionally circle jerks with each other while stuffing money up their rectums."
Unless I'm horribly mistaken, this may be vandalism.-- HitmanSam (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Vandalism?

message: That last line is completely inappropriate, and does not belong in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.233.80.98 (talk) 14:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re:  Unusual Statement.
Talk:Earl of Derby

message: "There can be no doubt that [the first Stanley earl] was made Earl of the county of Derby, and the fact seems never to have been questioned till of late years. Courthope (in a MS. note to this title) states that having inspected the Charter Roll of 1 Hen. VII he finds that 'although there are no words in the charter stating that he was made Earl of the county of Derby, there is the usual clause directing the payment of £20 per annum by the Sheriff of Derby and Notts, out of the profits of those counties.' It is, however, a curious coincidence that the estates of the family were chiefly in the hundred of West Derby, co. Lancaster, while they appear to have had no land and no connection with the county of Derby." The Complete Peerage, vol. IV, page 206. Opera hat (talk) 10:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the answer may be that the title formally refers to the county, but that that particular county was chosen because of the 1st Earl's connection with the similarly-named hundred. Proteus (Talk) 13:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derby/West Derby 

message: The portrait on this page labelled Thomas, 1st Earl of Derby, is clearly not him, being obviously later 16C, given the costume and beard. It looks far more like Edward, the 3rd Earl or Henry, 4th Earl: long beards were not worn in Thomas's time. The collar is identical to one worn by Henry in another portrait: see 1590s portrait of Henry. Silverwhistle (talk) 11:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Portrait 
Talk:Pseudoconvexity

message: A discussion would be useful.Rich 20:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they are. At least if you by convex mean ordinary linear convexity. This is a elementary result which can be found in, Holomorphic functions and integral representations in several complex variables, ISBN 0-387-96259-x, by  R. Michael Range Vigfus (talk) 11:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Are all convex sets in C^n pseudoconvex?

message: The redirection here of the link Hartogs' domain is somewhat misleading, since those domains are extremely particular pseudoconvex domains, having properties not shared by other kind of set belonging to such class. It is necessary to create separated entry: anyone interested? :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection of Hartogs' domain 

message: Is it true that the defining function of a Levy pseudoconvex domain can be extended to all of C^n? Shouldn't it rather be a neighborhood of the closure of the Levy pseudoconvex domain?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.88.228 (talk) 21:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  defining functions
Talk:Captain Flamingo

message: I remember the Nelvana Logo (grossology variant) being on one of the shows promos, except captain flamingo is the one who gets slimed. I think it was on the split screen credits of a episode of Martin mystery (which the credits completely broke down).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:550:A700:111D:4E33:9275:2D90 (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something
Talk:Raymond High School (Mississippi)

message: Nowhere does it say that a school has to be "notable" - it only needs to provide factual information.
:Factual != verifiable.  I tagged this with a new template that will either get this expanded, merged into the article on the town, or nominated again for deletion.  If you can cite some sources, reasonable sources, for the information you've posted, then you have a fighting chance.  Otherwise you can be sure that the article will disappear one way or another. --Jemiller226 04:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cranfield

message: This page is very unencyclopedic and requires a lot of attention. I have marked it for a cleanup. Miltonkeynes 20:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Quebecers

message: I moved it down to "Start" class because this is just too short and cursory to be anything more than the start of an article on the Quebecers MPJ-DK 13:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rated: Start class 

message: As The Quebecers they used We're Not The Mounties in the WWF.  
As The Amazing French Candians they used the national anthem of Canada without lyrics. 
I know this from watching them in WWF and WCW.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.17.189 (talk) 09:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Song 
Wikipedia talk:Consistency proposal

message: This is not a vote.
An unnecessary constraint. The idea of NPOV allows for statements of fact which are opposed by certain schools of thought, which ought to be mentioned, but which would be deleted on the ground of consistency. Thus it should be possible to allow  for other possibilities in an article, as noted in Wikipedia:Good Article etc., which provide guidance to the editorship. As an example, flat earth is a viewpoint which can be mentioned in the earth article, without worry about adherence to consistency, when in fact the marketplace of ideas has already voted about the flatness of earth. --Ancheta Wis 20:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't consider different opinions to be inconsistencies. The fact that two different groups of people say two different things is not logically contradictory. Samohyl Jan 07:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, I think you and Trebor are right, to require it would be impractical. I now agree that it is not a good idea to have it as a policy. Samohyl Jan 07:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Midshipman's Hope

message: The plot summary in the article is the same as the blurb on the back of the book as vieweable on Amazon at . That would appear to make it a copyright violation. Edison 20:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: better handled together  DGG ( talk ) 05:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing lost by the merge, and the main saga page is already tagged with a notability discussion. I've boldly merged, given the tone of the above arguments.Klbrain (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Seafort Saga]]
Talk:Beethoven (TV series)

message: I would have thought that the length of the episodes would be roughly half an hour like the page says, but after getting access to the episodes it appears that they're each more like ten minutes in length. If that's true then it's more than likely each episode aired as two segments. Can anyone confirm how this series aired? -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 05:10, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode length