Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction)

message: This article could really do with a picture of the Tokyo Disneyland attraction. 65.130.130.94 (talk) 16:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyo Disneyland version 

message: There are a particularly fascinating series of analyses on the ride's structure and use of narrative, taking cues from prominant trends in film and media theory of the 1960s. As far as I know, none of these theories have been published in academic journals, but could we find a way to incorporate them? This is one of my favorites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonboots (talk • contribs) 18:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The citation you provide is a self-published blog, and thus is not considered notable. Reliable sources need not be of a scholarly nature to be considered reliable; newspapers, magazines and the like are quite acceptable. Blogs and fan-sites, however, are not.  --McDoobAU93 18:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Analysis

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002040455/http://www.mouseshoppe.com/Merchant5/productzoom/32500.jpg to http://www.mouseshoppe.com/Merchant5/productzoom/32500.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: One or more anonymous users have been inserting the claim that this ride is a log flume. Is there any support or consensus for such a claim? If not, I’d consider adding a hidden comment where it’s usually inserted, since the user appears noncommunicative. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Pirates does not fit the definition of a log flume according to the description of a flume in the "Ride Design" section of the wiki page, Log flume (ride). I believe it is just one persistent — and annoying — user who insists on making this change. I support the addition of a hidden comment although I doubt it will stop this user from vandalizing the page.—JlACEer (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s only vandalism if it’s , which the user’s edits elsewhere do not seem to be. More likely a lack of competence and of understanding what words mean, I would think. If the hidden text doesn’t help, would you say an indef semi-protect request would be reasonable? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's vandalism when the person has been repeatedly told that they are incorrect and warned. Deliberately introducing incorrect information is vandalism. oknazevad (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Log flume 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: List something about the two goats that appear on the ride. 174.24.104.56 (talk) 01:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goats