lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silesian offensives

message: Should any article that has to "survive" an AfD really belong in a reference work?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 12:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  survived 

message: Perhaps there was some misunderstanding. I am not insisting on the name (Silesian Offensives). The purpose of this article is not to create some artificial name for the Lower and Upper Silesian Offensives; it is to describe the history of Silesia during early 1945, when it was taken by Soviets from the Germans. Thus the scope of the article is actually slightly larger than than the two mentioned operations; since it also includes the end of the Sandomierz-Silesian Offensive Operation and the Moravian-Ostrava Offensive Operation. In other words, this article should not be seen as part of the canon series of the Strategic operations of the Red Army in World War II‎, but as part of the History of Silesia sub article series, gathering info about all of the 1945 combat taking place in Silesia in one place. PS. As for references: it is obvious that any refs describing the smaller offensives are relevant to this article. And there are many publications on the history of Silesia, including those dedicated to early 1945, so the subject is not ORish and is certainly notable.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, if you have something of that sort planned for this article, would something along the lines of History of Silesia during World War II or History of Silesia in 1945 be a more appropriate title, in that case?Esdrasbarnevelt (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to say, listify! I can think of at least a dozen Silesian offensives in the last two centuries. After all, other things happened in Silesia even in 1945 aside from the Soviet offensives! If writing about history of Silesia, it would be an article from the inhabitants' perspective, so Defence of Silesia during World War II would seem far more appropriate, particularly since there was such a German plan--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 09:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus
Talk:Presentation College, Bray

message: History, ¶1:
:Central to the school's history was its connections to the Presentation Brothers; however, the last resident Brother left the school in 2003.
History, ¶2:
:The last Brother left in 2002 after the Brothers closed the monastery at the school.
Which is it? --Thnidu (talk) 03:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, there is no source for either date, and a quick Google search did not help. I have changed it (in the second instance) to "the early 2000s". I deleted the first as needless duplication.  Scolaire (talk) 17:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2002 or 2003? 
Talk:MDL Information Systems

message: Most of the content was copied from Elsevier MDL where it was added by user 70.134.47.66. A reverse DNS lookup indicates this IP address is associated with mdl.com. Nurg (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: My impression is that the original name was "Molecular Design Ltd", rather than "Molecular Design Limited, Inc." The former was how I recollect the name in documentation in the 1985-1988 timeframe. Although the Delaware entity records show MOLECULAR DESIGN, INC., registered 05/21/1976. Catrachos (talk) 15:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Name 
Talk:Korg Polysix

message: The link "New patches from AnalogAudio1" leads to a youtube video advertising a purchasable sample package. Don't think this belongs here...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.190.104.111 (talk) 15:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement in External Links
Talk:MBC1 (Middle Eastern and North African TV channel)

message: I wrote some lines on the MBC 1 show Kalam Nawaem, gathering most info from a TV documentary that showed footage from the programme and some of society's responses to it. Of course I can't link to a TV documentary, and I think the paragraph needs more references. Anyone?  Wurdnurd (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kalam Nawaem
Talk:National Grid for Learning

message: This page suffers badly from a confusion and poor usage in the original project between the National Grid for Learning project on which the article is fairly accurate and the NGfL website on which it is also correct, but it then confuses the two. Usage in the article is inconsistent between the two. In its broader original sense of a national project to exploit the new communications technologies with earmarked (hypothecated for non-English speakers) funds conditional upon a school internet connection, the NGfL initiative is still with us and there remains a related programme of subsequent earmarked funding for the period 2008-11. The web site may have been closed, the logo dropped and the usage abandoned, but the basic initiative, albeit re-branded, is still with us.
See my article on Regional Broadband Consortia Regional Broadband Consortium for an explanation of why the usage survives in some regions. NGfL funds required the creation of RBCs, funding was conditional upon it!Steve H (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy

message: The section I tagged as an NPOV violation is redolent with unsupported assumptions about the current state of advocacy and politics in the USA, and seems to be either a direct quote from a publication of the NCRP or else original research. ~ MD Otley (talk) 14:37, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Havering College of Further and Higher Education

message: https://seagullnic.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/death-is-not-the-end-the-conspiracy-surrounding-the-deaths-of-john-bauldie-and-matthew-harding/
Is this a nonsense or does it have any traction? Though all three are now dead I assume no development took place and no one made a fortune... 
Whatever happened is it an aspect of the College that should be noted? 
131.111.184.102 (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penny Garner  

message: This, and possibly some of the other details in the infobox, need updating - see  Jackiespeel (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Head of Governance
Talk:Milngavie water treatment works

message: Bankell  storage reservoir  is to the east of Craigmaddie Reservoir, rather than the north as stated.
The name Bankell is not used, as far as I am aware, for the large storage reservoir to the north of Craigmaddie Reservoir.
The above unsigned comment is correct, and one wonders why the contributor did not correct the entry.  The relationship of the two Victorian reservoirs and the two (wholly underground) clearwater storage tanks would be better explained by separating the two historic phases Jgedwards (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bankell is east, not north of Craigmaddie Reservoir
Talk:The Wrongstar Society

message: I am contributing to Wiki so that there can be a database of influential Nu Skool Breaks artists, but moderators keep deleting every page I create. The Wrongstar Society meet the guidelines for a band because they have been broadcast on national radio for over 30 minutes. One moderator has already agreed to this but then the page was deleted by somebody else! Jamesdonoghue (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Newport Bus

message: outdated wording found in this paragraph in the "history" section:
On 18 May 2020, in partnership with Transport for Wales (TfW), and its parent local council, Newport Bus transferred some of its routes to Fflecsi, a demand responsive transport service in the city, in which Newport Bus continues to operate the service but is commanded by TfW. The scheme is to end on 25 September 2022.
"The scheme <has ended> on 25 Sept 2022." would be better 86.53.179.230 (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[fflecsi] is to end on..." has ended.
Talk:Cathkin Park

message: The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
----
There seems to be a considerable amount of overlap between the two articles Cathkin Park (1872–1903) and Cathkin Park, with both articles actually referring to the other with what I believe is called a hatnote. I am therefore proposing that since neither one is a substantial article these two articles be merged into one, and since it would make more sense for the merged article to be titled Cathkin Park, without reference to any specific date, I am proposing that we merge Cathkin Park (1872–1903) into this article, Cathkin Park. Cottonshirtτ 02:54, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They are two different stadiums that existed at the same time. The articles are not going to be merged. Please go and do something else with your time. Crowsus (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And please don't misrepresent my comments. These are two separate stadiums with different and concurrent histories. I was pointing out that in order to merge them, the article would have to do some very weird overlapping. I echo Crowsus' statement. Number 57 06:04, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Cathkin Park (1872–1903)
Talk:News 12 Networks

message: It's appears News 12 blocks FIOS users from accessing it's web-page and then requests if they are a cablevision subsrciber. I think this is a noteworthy topic for this page. I hope to do more research into it and update this page. 74.101.163.144 (talk) 18:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: News 12 blocking FIOS Users from accessing it's website
Talk:Nepal Stock Exchange

message: After uploading a newer version image file of NEPSE Logo, it is noticed that the older file is still being displayed in the article main page. I tried clearing the cache in my browser as instructed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Uploading_images#Technical_aspects , but it won't work. I even used another web browser and another pc as well to see the change but that problem still persisted. I also followed few purging methods explained at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Purge but they even did not work. So, I request to fix or help fix this issue. Thanks in advance !  --Mkg just4u (talk) 13:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem After Uploading New Version Logo Image

message: Ok 2001:4430:50B5:A2C8:0:0:2DC:CB04 (talk) 10:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to make green tea 

message: When does nepse open 2407:54C0:1B16:E0C1:850F:FFF4:B812:C0AF (talk) 01:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepse
Talk:Sesame Street News Flash

message: I deleted the sentence that I did because it's contradictory stuff about actual, real-world legalistic decisions. Better safe then who-knows-what. Lots42 (talk) 07:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Freshfield

message: Alterations I have made include specifying how distinct, or indistinct Freshfield is from Formby in different manners. Also, the content of the article, specifically phrases such as "commonly referred to as the more sophisticated part of Formby, are both unverifiable and of questionable neutrality.
Saying that Freshfield "consists" of the features listed suggests that Freshfield IS simply those features and nothing else. Hence I altered that sentence slightly. Also, using Pinewoods as a proper noun for the small area of the Mersey Forest is local parlance rather that cartographic accuracy.
Saxon2060 (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: List of features converted to prose in new section. Snowy 1973 (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NewsFire

message: tried to download it and was forwarded to apple's app store. 
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/newsfire/id408817888?mt=12&ls=1 sais it costs 5us-d
in the european app store it costs 4€.
87.185.135.176 (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you're right. Looks like they've switched to paid only now that the Mac App Store is released. Thanks for helping update the article. Steven Walling 18:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newsfire not freeware anymore 
Talk:Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia

message: There is next to nothing about the history of the party in this article. – Kaihsu (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?
Talk:Two Grey Rooms

message: "when she encountered the story of New German Cinema director Rainer Werner Fassbinder". This is not true, she has said in all interviews that the subject of the story was part of the 'Fassbinder scene', not Fassbinder himself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jezwells (talk • contribs) 08:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: Yes, it's nothing to do with Fassbinder - maybe the story is inspired by Max Faßbender  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.253.213.7 (talk) 09:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information
Talk:Generation 9/11

message: This is not a commonly-used term, and if so ought to have more (any) sources. The X-Y-Z terms or "millennial" are the commonly-used terms for the post-1980 generations. Hence, this article ought to be a candidate for deletion. Sanzoneja (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:River Roe

message: In A Dictionary of Ulster Place Names, McKay gives "perhaps 'the roaring one' as the meaning (pg 125).  This is likely based on O'Rahilly (Early Irish Histoy and Mythology, pg 5) and Pokorny (in Geographie Irlands bei Ptolemaois, ZCP 24 (1954), where he connects it with  the Name Cú Rói, older form Cú Raui which he translates as "brüllender Schlachthund" (.i. roaring battle-hound).  The connection with Mod. ró "rowing" is not correct at all...that is a modern loan from English (not even in Dinneen) and it is masc. not fem.. The link for the reference to a Viking meaning and red is not working, and both would seem doubtful considering the Old Irish form - Róa (as in Onomasticon Goedelicum).  Red would be rúad in Old Irish.
Cmconraoi (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaning
Talk:Classroom management

message: "Assertive Discipline" Section
The section on "Assertive Discipline" provides no information on the subject besides the names of some authors of a related web page. The web page is included as a hot-link within the section! Hot-links, aside from those directing to other Wikipedia articles, should only be included in the "external links" section. Either someone who cares about "Assertive Discipline" should provide some relevant information on the subject in lieu of the hot-link, or the section should be deleted.----Dannooll  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannooll (talk • contribs) 06:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional information has been added to Assertive Discipline Gcuartas0321 (talk) 19:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is page is of great help. Please more on this thanks Specialfaith03 (talk) 11:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appreciation 

message: alphabat/Capital and small letters 105.115.1.223 (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verbal Reasoning
Talk:Soviet Air Forces order of battle 1 May 1945

message: Please do your best, everyone, to make this article easier to read and scan through. Feel free to reorganize it in any way you feel would make it easier to read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexkvaskov (talk • contribs) 18:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Making this article easier to read

message: I think I should explain this. The actual term used in the Russian OOB is ob'yekty, which literally means objects. However, in the military sense it can mean structures, and targets. In my opinion (and it is just that), the real meaning here is the actual area of responsibility of the unit in terms of installations, facilities and other possible locations that the enemy may choose to attack. In this sense the meaning is more an area-related definition then a specific location, so I opt to translate as "Patrol Area of" since this describes the operational activity of the unit within the realm of its responsibilities.-- mrg3105mrg3105   03:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrol Area of
Talk:Monta (Eyeshield 21 character)

message: I feel it would be better if we moved this page to [ Taro Raimon] (from [ Monta (Eyeshield 21)]) (because it really is Monta's real name). --kazu (talk) 06:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Fairey Delta 1

message: This advert in Flight 23rd March 1951 gives first flight date as 12 March that year. as does this GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The recent "Fairey - Company Profile 1915-1960" also has the 12 March 1951. I have other sources that dont give the actual date but none that say the 10th. MilborneOne (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Wings of Fame Volume 11 has 12 March 1951, as does Taylor's Fairey Aircraft since 1915. It looks like sources are in general agreement about the date.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight date 

message: This 1954 article shows a VTO model undergoing rocket launches, and I think another source said that different configurations for the FD1 were tested in model on rockets before they finished the design.  GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: E.10/47 covered the design and construction of a prototype, tailess, jet propelled Delta aircraft, to provide data on:
#the aerodynamic characteristics of Delta wing aircraft and the use of jet thrust as a means of control.
#the problems involved in vertical launching.
Perhaps after all the testing with models they decided they didnt need to do any more research on the vertical bit, I havent got the Putnam Fairey book but that might have more on the large number of models produced and the results. MilborneOne (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any more on the VTO angle 

message: I believe both the Avro 707 and the Boulton Paul P111 delta wing aircraft flew before the FD1, in 1949 and 1950 respectively. Bobins2 (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First British Delta
Talk:Horten H.IV

message: I might well be wrong, but that number 21.8 looks very like the aspect ratio.  If so, the wing area is about 18.9 sq m, which is just the same as that of his later I.Ae.34.  This had a slightly shorter span.  Where do the specs come from?TSRL (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (moved under heading)Is it possible that the Horten IV is a record holder for its design attributes? Highest aspect ratio among flying wing aircraft?  Powered or unpowered?  DeepSkyFrontier (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the numbers on plausible web sites (e.g. http://www.sailplanedirectory.com/PlaneDetails.cfm?planeID=158) are right, then the Horten VI certainly trumps the IV with an aspect ratio of 32.4.  Photos make that number seem possible.TSRL (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked around more, and the Schempp-Hirth Nimbus-4 has an AR of 38.8. Not a flying wing, of course.TSRL (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As its name implies the Open Class is open to any aircraft with few limitations. As you so rightly said there are classes which impose limits on dimensions, typically span, and accoutrements like flaps. Unfortunately these classes are quite fluid and those that I remember have been altered beyond recognition.Petebutt (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Aspect ratio not Airfoil?
Talk:383rd Rifle Division

message: (Suggestions are welcome) :)
*for the DYK, maybe details of war could be included. For example, Battles Won or Fought, etc. --Boguslav (talk) 06:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article has already been listed at the dyk page: .  It looks like his suggestion is pretty similar to yours. Ostap 07:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the interest guys, but I listed this for DYK a while ago. I usually nominated my articles the day I write them, to increase their chances...Bogdan що? 16:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK 

message: It seems highly unlikely that an inexperienced division would inflict 6,500 enemy casualties in a single battle, given the general background of the period (German forces overwhelming Soviet defenses until november 1941 at least) JurSchagen (talk) 22:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Losses inflicted
Talk:Western European migration to Britain

message: No good idea!!!!! Why????!!! What about the articles "Greek-American", "Greek-Australians", "Greek-Canadians", "Greeks in Germany" ???? Do you want to merge them into "Western European migration to the U.S, Australia, Canada and so on..." ???
An other point is that Germans (at least not in the historical sense -which include regions in Eastern Europe or even Russia-) can't be considerd "Western European". See Central European and Western Europe. Germany, or better West-Germany was only considered Western European in Cold War times - and in this short time few Germans settled in the U.K. So Germans should be removed from this article. And today more and more Germans consider themselves again Central Europeans - also in former West Germany. In East Germany nearly no one consider himself Western European. 195.243.51.34 (talk) 06:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Angels Running

message: The bot that noted "possible copyvio" did so because the song and personnel lists for this album match a web site list.  Does this violate the rule on copying?  There really isn't much way to avoid putting up an identical list.  There are other albums by this artist with the song list included as the largest portion of the entry.  How do they avoid the same tag?  --  Couillaud (talk) 23:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:AYA Cancer

message: What does this mean: "Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) marks a new focus in medical health care today. While cancer is often recognized as an old person's disease, it is this concept that has led to many misdiagnoses of individuals with cancer daily." What is the concept that has led to misdiagnoses -- the error that cancer is solely an old person's disease? If so, then wouldn't something like this be clearer: "The error that cancer is solely an old person's disease has caused many failures to diagnose cancer in the young." 
Hughdbrown (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification, please

message: This seemed to be an article that has been abandoned after a few sentences. The tone of it was completely wrong imo, like an essay. I have reduced it to a factual, one line stub and added categories, a stub template and a 'needs references' tag. Perhaps someone will pick it up and run with it ... --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: A new page entitled Cancer in adolescents and young adults has been created and this page now redirects there instead of Childhood cancer. DarylM at NCI (talk) 17:01, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: New page created for topic