lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Death of Eric Cartman

message: I think there should be a mention that the title is a reference to the beavis and butthead episode "beavis and butthead are dead"
:I think that there shouldn't be, unless you can cite it.Alastairward (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't sound like a reference to that, to be honest.  In any case, that title itself was a reference to the line "Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are dead" in Hamlet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.254.231 (talk) 19:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't think there is any proof of this, but I find this episode to be a parody of "Ghost Whisperer" and "My Name Is Earl"... If only these shows existed at the time this episode originally aired!!!! All of the plot is suspiciously similar to those two shows, that, I repeat, weren't aired at the time of this South Park episode. It seems very weird to me. Is there any reference to this, or was it just coincidence? Is this episode based on any other similar shows? --212.183.217.154 18:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Coincidence?

message: On the bus stop Cartman makes a remark about a chick on the news that had her left tittie cut off. It may refer to the German cannibal that cut off his girlfriend's left breast, cooked and ate it 2005. I am not from the USA and there miight have been some other similar cases in the USA I know nothing about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ptasiek83 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannibal remark. Need a verification 

message: There are also references to a movie "Ghost".
:Cite? Alastairward (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another movie 

message: Cite or they remain here;
* The episode is a parody of The Sixth Sense.
* Butters is put through various treatments similar to the ones seen in The Exorcist.
Alastairward (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural References
Talk:First Maroon War

message: This article does a good job of giving an overview of what how First Maroon War got started, and the treaty that would end it. I do have a problem with the use of it's sources though. Nothing in the article, is cited although at it does show that the author has used multiple sources at the bottom of the article. The article did stay on topic though, and led me to read the Wikipedia page on the Second Maroon War, which was also adequately written about. While reading this article, I found that it stayed neutral throughout, it didn't lean towards the Maroons, or the British which I enjoyed. 
The work cited for the article...
 Patterson, Orlando (1970), "Slavery and Slave Revolts: A Sociohistorical Analysis of the First Maroon War, 1665-1740", in Price, Richard, Maroon Societies: Rebel Slave Communities in the Americas, Anchor Books (published 1973), 
Campbell, Mavis C. (1990), The Maroons of Jamaica, 1655-1796, Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 
Among the early historians to mention the Jamaican Maroons and the First Maroon War were the following:
Dallas, R. C. (1803), The History of the Maroons, From Their Origin to the Establishment of their Chief Tribe at Sierra Leone, London: Longman
Edwards, Bryan (1793), History, Civil and Commercial, of the British Colonies in the West Indies
Long, Edward (1774), The History of Jamaica
     While it looks like there is a good mixture of primary, and secondary sources, I tried to follow up on these sources but there are no links to the material. Also I didn't see any footnotes of any kind throughout the article leading me to believe that there is plagiarism in this piece of writing.
 
     Practically all of the work cited stays neutral, it usually just gives one side of the story, but it doesn't root for a certain side. Although I would say that this article doesn't discuss the British interpretation of the War very much, it tends to stay on Jamaica's point of view, and focus on the Maroons. 
     Also while reading this article I would have liked to have more information on actual battles that took place during the revolt, and maybe some of the key military figures on both sides. It describes how the British personal in charge of Jamaica thought that they couldn't defeat the Maroons, but I want to know why that is 
WillStickle (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Critique 

message: Although Nanny Town is mentioned briefly, Nanny of the Maroons herself is not.  Considering her central role in this era, she should be given her own section. Josh a brewer (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nanny 

message: What cause the first maroon war to start 190.80.69.75 (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first maroon war
Talk:Angara

message: It its lower flow it was used to be known as the Upper Tunguska. Thanks.  Mattisse 21:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement removed from article is here 
Talk:Second Maroon War

message: I inserted a section about the Returned Maroons, who came back from Sierra Leone to Flagstaff. There's no corresponding academic book about it, and the only detailed information on their return is David Ingleman's blog on the Flagstaff Maroons website. When an academic article is published in the autumn of this year, I will add more to this sentence.Mikesiva (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gallinuloides

message: The Dinosauricon has so many pages and on one of the page that had pictures the was an image of a skeletal Gallunoides.They did not have Git in the dinosaur index by letter for G.
--408.965.879.065.765.216.519.296.848.4 21:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Could not find

message: I think the name is spelt Gallinuloides and it was a gallinaceous bird living in the Eocene... Dysmorodrepanis 23:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name error?
Talk:EM Data Bank

message: Ok, I missed the deletion notice. I am reinstating this page and highlighting its importance. I didn't see any vote in the Google cache, if so sorry for being out of line. If you want to get a published structure by CryoEM you have to go here. I think this page need to be developed much like the PDB. This is not an advertisement and I am not associated with the webpage at all. --vossman 21:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beggar's Night

message: I do not think that this is a term notable enough for its own article, but a redirect to Halloween wouldn't be harmful. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 21:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and redirect. From a quick search, I think it's in wide enough use that a redirect would be plenty useful. If someone wants to revert, and write a more substantial article that's ok with me. I'd probably object to an outright deletion via prod though. ScottW 00:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Microsoft Software Assurance

message: This list is kind of stupid, as what was provided by SA depended on both what product you had covered, and how long you had SA on it.  For instance if you bought SQL Server 2000 in 2002 with Software Assurance on Open License, then you would not have recieved SQL Server 2005 unless you'd renewed your SA.  However if you'd bought on the same program in 2004 then you would.  Ultimately, every upgrade was potentially available through SA, but it depends on when you had coverage......  However, with the release of Windows Vista, there will be at least one MS product ONLY available through SA - Windows Vista Enterprise. --Brecker 21:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this list is pointless. Also, as Microsoft further moves the focus of SA from the upgrade benefit, it's even less relevant. 71.91.218.178 02:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Upgrades that Software Assurance Provided 

message: Thinking more about this, this part's dodgy as well - it very much depends on what scheme you pruchased through as SA can be either 2 or 3 years in length, and can be renewed. --Brecker 12:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value
Talk:Senses

message: Why isn't this an disambiguation page with a link to the band? I was looking for this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense
and I doubt this's the first time that happened.
:Same here. ZNull 10:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I decided to be WP:BOLD and included a disambiguation template. I don't know if I should have linked directly to Sense instead of Sense (disambiguation) though ... what do others think about this? —Cohen the Bavarian 14:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab page
Talk:Anastasia of Sirmium

message: If you read the Catholic Encyclopedia article which is linked to from this one, you note that it says:
:...Nevertheless, she is not a Roman saint, for she suffered martyrdom at Sirmium, and was not venerated at Rome until almost the end of the fifth century. It is true that a later legend, not earlier than the sixth century, makes Anastasia a Roman, though even in this legend she did not suffer martyrdom at Rome. The same legend connects her name with that of St. Chrysogonus, likewise not a Roman martyr, but put to death in Aquileia, though he had a church in Rome dedicated to his honour...
You can see why I found it strange that Anastasia was referred to as a "Roman Catholic saint"; even if she had hailed from Rome and been a member of the Latin-liturgy Roman Church, the term is anachronistic, since the Eastern and Western churches were not in schism when she died and the appellations "Roman Catholic," "Greek Orthodox," etc. were not in use.  I believe she is venerated by Anglicans as well as Catholics and Orthodox, so to claim her as a "Roman Catholic" saint is misleading -- not false, but misleading -- as it tells only part of the story.  --Jpbrenna 21:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "Anastasia of Sirmium/Anastasia the Deliverer from Potions", whose feast day in the Orthodox Church is celebrated on December 22, is NOT the same saint as "Anastasia the Roman", whose feast day in the Orthodox Church is on October 29. The OCA website has 2 different lives for these 2 different martyr saints, who were probably (near) contemporaries. Wikipedia does not seem to have an article for Anastasia the Roman. :) ΙΣΧΣΝΙΚΑ-888 (talk) 04:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect page "Anastasia the Roman" is Wrong

message: This is wrong
2001:44B8:4130:BE00:8DB9:E7DE:BE7:200D (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi there
Talk:Skinny Puppy discography

message: I really wanted to get an article like this up, but it's far from complete. Some singles preceeded their albums but are listed here as following them. I'll eventually put this into a huge table. Naufana : talk 21:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete

message: I added a table w/ a chronological list of all SPs releases, primarily to justify the Last/Next links in the various album's articles. Naufana : talk 23:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronological list
Talk:Tantrix

message: This article does not cite any sources. I have tagged it in hope that this may be remedied.
Scottlc 23:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No sources

message: Does anyone know if this game was developed from Psyche-Paths (1969)? Or are the similarities a coincidence? —MJBurrage • TALK • 21:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remarkably similar - though Psyche-Paths differs in that there's only three colors, and it's possible to have two or even all three paths be the same color on one tile.  I would imagine there are considerably more pieces involved, assuming that every possible permutation exists.  As to whether the developer of Tantrix was aware of the prior existence of Psyche-Paths or came up with the idea independantly, well, you'd have to ask him I guess.  (The concept is basic enough that it's not out of the question for two people to come up with it on their own.) Lurlock (talk) 19:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Derived from ''Psyche-Paths''

message: Images representing piece 25 and piece 28 are reversed according to https://www.jaapsch.net/puzzles/tantrix.htm .  Please see the list of numbered pieces on the above web page. Also photographs of piece 25 top, piece 28 bottom in this web page: https://imgur.com/EH1qsFx confirm.
--Mcarp0 (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made pictures of my Dutch Travel Tantrix set to confirm that the two tiles are swapped, see here and here.. Jaap 83.84.24.226 (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Image reversed

message: Listed as white piece, should be yellow.  You cant do the rainbow yellow puzzles unless 44 is yellow.  Once again referring to https://www.jaapsch.net/puzzles/tantrix.htm .
--Mcarp0 (talk) 07:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Piece 44

message: What means mysterious abbreviation VM in table header? Jumpow (talk) 19:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is VM  

message: The article mentions the first versions being made of cardboard, and then "in 1991, the tiles were changed to plastic". In fact, tantrix tiles are made from bakelite, which is, indeed, a kind of "plastic" - the earliest plastic to be made from synthetic components, I'd like to change the broad "plastic" into the more specific "bakelite". But I do not know if it was made from bakelite in 1991, or if that came later. The article mentions some pieces being dropped from the set in 1993, and the first big contract in 1994; maybe the choice of bakelite (givin a slightly more exclusive feel to the product than many other types of plastic) was made on one of those occasions. Anyone know sources? Nø (talk) 12:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bakelite
Talk:Biasing

message: Grid bias is an unreference stub and spends most of its content describing the idea of bias.  There's a useful discussion of methods of obtaining bias lacking in this article. They could be usefully merged. --Wtshymanski (talk)
:Support Absolutely, I see no need of it.    Grid biasing could also be discussed in Triode or Control grid. --ChetvornoTALK 23:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge with [[Grid bias]]

message: This article's short description when viewed in the search bar currently reads as
"Predetermined voltages or currents establishing prop..."
getting cut off. Reading this, it's hard to understand what this article is or isn't.
Most people view the SD in the search bar when searching for articles. An SD needs to be short so people can read the search results quickly to decide which article they need to click on. In this way, an SD distinguishes similarly-titled articles, not so much similarly-themed articles.
When I do a search result for "bias", the drop-down lists quite a few results that get cut off. Because @Kvng is engaged on this issue I will ask him to shorten the SD for Biasing as best he can; I'll be shortening all those others. Wizmut (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it to "Background operating conditions for electronics". "Predetermined voltages or currents..." is also a reasonable abbreviated description. Having a longer description clipped is not the end of the world and it certainly is better than a shorter description that's incorrect or ambiguous. 's shortening was "Calibration in electronics". Biasing is not a calibration; Calibration does not appear anywhere in the article. ~Kvng (talk) 20:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description
Talk:Democratic Party of Kosovo

message: I can't help noticing that both the two major political parties in Kosovo are described as being for a free and democratic Kosovo.  I get no inkling of any difference between them.  Does the left/right spectrum exist in Kosovo? -86.133.243.52 21:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did these simple tests to check common English usage (along the lines of WP:UE): -considering only English-language results for "Democratic Party of Kosovo", excluding "Social Democratic Party of Kosovo", "Albanian Christian Democratic Party of Kosovo", "Serbian Democratic Party of Kosovo", "Social Democratic Party of Kosovo", "Turkish Democratic Party of Kosovo", etc; and thus not considering cases in which content is restricted-
Google Print:
Google Scholar:
Amazon.com:
The New York Times:
BBC:
CNN:
Kosovo (23 books)
Kosovo (57 results)
Kosovo (11 books)
Kosovo (11 results)
Kosovo (30 results)
Kosovo (21 results)
Kosova (6 books)
Kosova (8 results)
Kosova (3 books)
Kosova (0 results)
Kosova (0 results)
Kosova (0 results)
Best regards, Evv 04:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  of Kosovo or Kosova ?
Talk:Díaz (surname)

message: :importance = high: based on 0.74% frequency (>0.5%) in Spain in 1994 --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Xx236 (talk) 12:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be Díaz 

message: So people keep adding Diaz as a hypixel mayor here (they've been doing this to multiple pages)
What do we do about that? Since I don't believe it's worth keeping here. Blegar1 (talk) 01:48, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about the Hypixel Diaz addition
Talk:House of David (commune)

message: This article, in several sections, seems to be apologistic of the group and its leaders. In fact, when it states that charges against Ben Purnell in the '20s were dropped, the trials were actually concluded because Mr. Purnell had died. The characterization of the Detroit Press' articles as "vulgar" is also not particularly neutral sounding. 98.226.221.69 (talk) 12:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I think most people looking for the House of David will want the article Davidic line, not this one. Proposing that this page be moved to House of David (commune). --Eliyak T·C 21:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Location 

message: some additional info about the park: Miniature train consisting of over a mile of track, 11 miniature steam engine trains built by House of David crafstmen. http://www.houseofdavidmuseum.org/index.html --Tinned Elk 01:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content for page
Talk:Gravitational field

message: Should there be a section on gravity in quantum mechanics ? MP (talk•contribs) 19:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To the extent that it is described by a field theory.  I would have added the section on it myself, if I knew anything about it...Someguy1221 20:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravity in QM ? 

message: RE: Article in Astronomy Today - RE: Flybys not following predictions
Gravity begins at the center of the Earth and as you continue out it becomes progressively less and less.
If a flyby goes into a position of less gravity, just by doing so, it should accelerate the speed of the
flyby. What do you think. I can explain gravity further. spacechat@hotmail.com
Galaxy2010 (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Questions about gravity should be directed to the science reference desk, at WP:RD/s. This page is for discussion of the article itself, and not its subject. Someguy1221 (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

text: It sounds like you are talking about Le Sage's theory of gravitation which is no longer taken seriously due to its many flaws. JRSpriggs (talk) 21:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there something we don't know about Gravity 

message: * added the gravitational field equations for both classical and GR,
* added some referances, hence removed the tag. Before I started there were still referances, so the tag wasn't even nessersary
--  F = q(E + v × B) 09:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The expansion became larger than I expected: some content ended up re-ordered, but I added 5 additional referances, and clarified all classical forms of the gravitational field equation, including the field due to a number of descrete external masses. I have a stomach-wrenching feeling the edits will be reverted just for that...--  F = q(E + v × B) 11:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: slight expansion

message: If I remember correctly from my physics clases, the gravitational field is not just defined as Gravitational Force over a test mass but with a limit. Also, it is not any Gravitational Force -as it might be interpreted from the article-.
I think it should be written as
: \boldsymbol{g}=\lim_{m \to 0}\frac{\boldsymbol{F}}{m}
where:
*m is the test mass
*F is the Gravitational Force between the mass that generates the field and the test mass JuancitoxTw (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of the gravitational field 

message: I think the citation from Jesse L. Greenstein in this article is very confusing and taken out of context. I learned about it from a question on Quora: Are gravitational waves the new (a)ether?, which links to this Wikipedia article. The analogy between gravitational field and ether is very far fetched and reflects the author's subjective opinion. I propose to remove the whole section.
Bartosz (talk) 22:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generally accepted fundamental hypothesis
Talk:Shtil'

message: The SumbandilaSat is planned to be launched aboard a Soyuz rocket. Dreammaker182 09:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated SumbandilaSat Status
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jewish Christianity/Tasks

message: If you have an idea for the Messianic Judaism WikiProject that you want to see worked on, feel free to post your suggestion here, or just add it to the list. inigmatus 21:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome to the Task List!

message: I was thinking this list should be pre-1960 or whenever the modern Messianic Movement became the recognizable entity it is today, and that another list List of Messianic Jewish leaders should list modern figures in the current movement from its identifiable modern beginnings to the present day (maybe 1960 onward?). Thoughts? inigmatus 05:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would depend entirely on how many pre-60's leaders there actually were. That were notable. --In ur base, killing ur dorfs 04:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Messianic Judaism important leaders 

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Messianic Judaism/Tasks → Wikipedia:WikiProject Jewish Christianity/Tasks – Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 September 10. ⇔ ChristTrekker 15:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  requested move
Talk:Taxonomy of wheat

message: "In the 1950s growing awareness of the genetic similarity (including some shared genones) of the wild goatgrasses"
should this sentence contain "genone" or "genome".
Andrius 21:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: genone

message: seems to work now .. Sancassania 01:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!Mark Nesbitt 07:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Mansfield Link 

message: Merriam-Webster says this has been said so long it may have stopped being incorrect. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/can-you-use-comprised-of-grammar  Invasive Spices (talk) 14 December 2022 (UTC)
:Yes, it is much more accepted now than it used to be.  But I don't think there's any point in discussing whether something in English is correct or not; it's not like we're grading school papers here.  I'm just looking for the best possible wording, and when you consider all the people who still believe it's always wrong to use comprise in that newer sense, and the alternatives that are universally accepted, it's a no-brainer to choose one of those alternatives.  There is much more discussion about whether "comprised of" is a good thing to use in Wikipedia, including the matter of its growing popularity and correctness, in my exhaustive essay on the subject.  Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comprise
Talk:Luscious Jackson

message: What about the Kostars?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.163.93 (talk) 05:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kostars

message: "The band played nearly every instrument heard on their records, and with the exception of a few non-LP cover songs wrote all of their own material..."
While this is true, it's also fairly normal for most modern rock bands. Does it need saying? Tsuguya (talk) 12:41, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Faint praise?