lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tylopilus felleus

message: Although it is not poisonous, it is not considered edible, due to its overwhelming bitterness. It may be so in the rest of the world but Tylopilus felleus is eaten in Viet Nam and considered a delicacy by people who can stand its bitterness. Some people eagerly wait for the rains in May and August to harvest the mushroom or to buy it from the market. There are specialty dishes combining T. felleus and meat or seafood. I suggest the readers to open the article in Vietnamese and use Google Translate to read up. --Mirrordor 17:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that is amazing! I will see what we can find.....Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Mirrordor, if you can figure which of those are reliable sources we'd be really grateful - this is fascinating....Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:12, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eating Tylopilus felleus 

message: Can the distribution be checked, please? The lead section says it grows in Northern Europe, but in fact it is much more spread. It is very common in the Czech Republic, which is definitely not in Northern Europe. Jan Kameníček (talk) 07:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note; I have remove "Northern" from the lead. Sasata (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution 

message: I've noticed that the last paragraph of the "Taxonomy" section has no application to the taxonomy of the fungi species. I think it should either be incorporated into the lead or made into an "Etymology" section, since the first sentence is about etymology of the scientific name and the next sentence talks about the common names the species has. Gug01 (talk) 15:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Taxonomy is being used as an all-encompassing term for "Systematics, nomenclature, etymology". You might want to see previous discussion on this here. Sasata (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last paragraph of "Taxonomy" section 
Talk:Leccinum

message: Anybody got a reference for the remark about "reports of poisoning"?  I'd always considered Leccinum to be about as safe as any mushroom genus out there. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Poisonings?

message: — Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
Talk:Umibōzu

message: This article is underdeveloped and is missing important citations for its information. Much of the information in the article is unsourced and needs to be given proper citations or deleted. Some important information is missing from the article including the origins of Umibōzu in Japanese folklore, and mentions in any myths or folk tales. There is a lot of work needed to be done to this article in order to meed Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and Expansion 

message: This article on the Umibōzu is poorly developed, and missing a significant amount of citations for the information that it details. The best thing to do with this article is to essentially rewrite it completely in sections such as Etymology, Beliefs, Description, Purported sightings, and appearances in popular culture. Each piece of information should be redone and realigned into one of these sections, with new information from properly (and reliably) sourced information given. It's a REALLY interesting article, it just needs to be properly redeveloped so that it meets Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards. Hopefully, someone comes along and gives it the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting and Adding Sources 

message: how to escape from a umibozu 124.105.102.237 (talk) 22:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is an umibozu
Talk:Yama-bito

message: First, it's Yamabito without the hyphen. An older translation (Primitive & mediaeval Japanese texts, Volume 1, Frederick Victor Dickins) simply translates it as "woodsman," but it's more than that. The Yamabito were an actual marginalized group of people in historic Japan, not some Gaijin fantasy of shape-shifting nonsense. It's not that the Yamabito changed into kami, it's that they told stories about people who interacted with mountain spirits, the kamikakushi: "literally, she has been hidden by the kami, by the spirits. She has been enslaved by some supernatural being." I got this quote, mind you, from the only reference the article so far provides. So three strikes and whoever wrote this faulty sentence is out. Once I get a working bibliography up I'll see what editing I can do. Duende-Poetry (talk) 15:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Yama-bito? a people not a myth

message: This is only a couple of confusing sentences that make up the entry, with no references. What should be done? Duende-Poetry (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Technically Not An Orphan, But...
Talk:Yōsei

message: It could use a bit of expansion, and whether Yosei is used to denote one particular tale of creatures or does it encompass other creatures like the Kijumuna as a type of yosei based on their perspective culturally?74.124.170.117 (talk) 06:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article seems kind of vague on the subject.
Talk:Wobbies World

message: Dam I was going to go to this as a kid, but it was closed. Made me so sad Enlil Ninlil (talk) 07:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I remember this being touted as "Springvale Road, Nunawadding". Google Maps has it zoned as Vermont South now, but it was never Forrest Hill. Really need to change the address. 125.253.110.202 (talk) 04:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Address 

message: This place was almost certainly being satirised in the sketch Pissweak World on The Late Show as it was open when the show aired and the show itself was based in Melbourne, the writers were all Melbourne Uni students etc. However I don't have any citations for this, someone would have to interview a member of the cast about this. Simgrant (talk) 07:36, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pissweak World
Talk:Bruce A. Fuhrer

message: was helping  on IRC with this article, and one of the changes was to mention that Rozites armeniacovelatus is now called Cortinarius armeniacovelatus. AussieNature seems convinced (they know Fuhrer personally) that the mention of rozites should be completely removed, but it is historically relevant. I'm not particularly fussed about how it's worded (I think it's acceptable as-is) but the historical name needs to be included. As an additional note, there seems to be no reference to support this name change, which must be included. Primefac (talk) 05:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I've found/added a reference that confirms both names. Primefac (talk) 06:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what do we call them? 
Talk:Isle of May

message: This is a well-written article that is badly referenced.--HisSpaceResearch 02:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:History of Shintō Musō-ryū

message: There is really no reason to call this "Jodo". These are simply "jo-kata" and any other added words is just unecissary. That is to day, this is SHINTO MUSO RYU JO KATA.
-R
Mekugi 11:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Should be easily fixed. Fred26 13:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Regrettably, I must fail this GA candidate.  The main reasons are:
*There aren't nearly enough references to meet WP:CITE requirements.  There should be at least one reference for each "fact" presented in the article.
*The article has multiple grammatical errors and examples of missing punctuation, such as "On a technical level, the purpose of the art defeating a swordsman in combat using the jō, with an emphasis on proper distance, timing and concentration" (the sentence is missing an "a").  It would be a good idea to have someone extensively copyedit the article before submitting it again.
*The article has a merge tag at the top.  This issue must be resolved (either merge it or remove the tag) before the article can become a GA.
*In the lead, there is an inline citation to "d" that links to nothing.  Fix this.
*Image:Shimizu Takaji.jpg does not have an adequate image summary, explaining where the image came from and why it's in the public domain.
*Why does the history from 1978 to the present day only explained in one sentence?  Provide some more information about this period.
*Citations should come after punctuation per WP:MOS.  I see several places where they are before commas and periods.
*There are several redlinks.  These should either be removed or the respective articles created.
Once these issues are resolved, I invite you to come back and try for GA status again.  Regards, Green451 16:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No arguments here. I havent had the time to go through it all. Fred26 18:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Not to mention it wasn't me who submitted the article for GA-status. Fred26 05:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed GA
Talk:NETFILE

message: I have reverted the addition of some disadvantages and asked that a source be provided per Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Saying that it is "common sense" is not a justification for ignoring those pillar of Wikipedia. And the presence of other unified material is never a justification for adding more invited material. Ground Zero | t 10:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting recent edits
Talk:Manifesto Antropófago

message: ...But what was it?
-- Mik 02:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The present translation of the Manifesto Antropófago has been copied from issue nr. 46 Spring 1999 of Third Text Magazine [Third World Perspectives on Contemporary Art & Culture] without the translator's permission. The translation is copyrighted 1999 by Third Text/Authors.
Robson (talk) 03:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation 

message: The title of this translation is not sensitive to the semantics of anthropophagy. Portuguese also has the word canibal -- much more common than antropofago and a direct cognate of "cannibal" in English. The best rendition would be the "Anthropophagist Manifesto." See for example, a translation byAlfred Mac Adam in the Revista de Antropofagia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.160.81.133 (talk) 21:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insensitive Translation 
Talk:B15 (New York City bus)

message: Can anybody help create a table for the route description? I was hoping that there would be two tables (one Northbound, one Southbound) with the left side showing what street it runs on and the right side showing transfer points. Titanosaurus 20:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table 

message: The redirect B15 (New York City bus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 01:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:B15 (New York City bus]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:David B. Harris

message: Has this guy done anything notable other than briefly express his provocative opinions a few times ? He may have some claim to expertise, but perhaps not more than thousands of others in the field.
38.131.225.246 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: Upon reading the source for this claim it is clear that the paragraph was a drastic misrepresentation of events.  In contrast to what was stated, it appears that coins were bugged and someone simply asked for Harris’s opinion.  People criticised the coins themselves not Harris’s statements about them. Since it is not relevant I completely removed the paragraph. -- jfry3 (talk) 03:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The coins were not bugged, they were commemoration coins with a cross-hatching pattern in them. But the US was criticised for paranoia, not Harris. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  03:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: bugged coins
Talk:Cathedral Basilica of St. Peter in Chains

message: Although this is the only Saint Peter in Chains, there are several other Saint Peter Cathedrals in the US.  Should the article title include the location to help disambiguate [i.e. Saint Peter in Chains Cathedral (Cincinnati)]?Goldnpuppy (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Saint Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church (Fort Wayne, Indiana)

message: It says the article is written like advertising, I would like to change it but know know exactly what I have to change.
:I've removed the tag, along with the full address. The article obviously needs to remain, however, and I'm not sure how any of the material left would be inappropriate. MisfitToys 01:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2022 Winter Olympics

message: https://sports.yahoo.com/american-julia-marino-withdraws-from-big-air-after-dispute-with-ioc-over-snowboard-sponsorship-120007886.html 2602:306:33C9:77E0:A5A3:C65B:8E86:7B83 (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No. This one just sounds like an athlete who didn't know about very long sanding rules. HiLo48 (talk) 21:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Add the IOC’s DQ Threat Against Julia Marino to $porting Controver$ies 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Kenya at the 2022 Winter Olympics and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Kenya at the 2022 Winter Olympics until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  DB1729 (talk) 13:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kenya at the 2022 Winter Olympics" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: China ranked 3rd in gold medals and 11th in total medals. Objectively that's not a bad result at all. I think it's straightforward and simple to just write in (The host nation China finished third with nine gold medals and also eleventh place by total medals won, marking their most successful performance in Winter Olympics history.) Yet what is the deal with someone here changing it and adding in the word "albeit", or not neutral terms and trying to present it as a terrible result that they get 11th in total medals. It's really not, and is both unnecessary and is somewhat petty to keep altering it to make it seem like 11th place is horrible. And also they did rank ahead of the United States according to the medal chart, so removing that mention too, also seems like petty and unnecessary changes. Robinchan99 (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason to keep changing back the sentence? 

message: — Assignment last updated by JessieL2001 (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing
Talk:2024 Summer Olympics

message: The redirect Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  -- Tavix (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if anyone wants to create the missing articles for Eritrea and Palestine they can now do so after quotas for road cycling (Eritrea) and dressage (Palestine) have been confirmed. Topcardi (talk) 15:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: can I get the source for the cycling quotas for eritrea? Paytonisboss (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The lead tells us "The Games will be the first to feature an identical number of athletes between men and women.". Seriously? Precisely equal numbers? I find this hard to believe. How is it being achieved? Perhaps something else is meant there. HiLo48 (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The quota designated by the IOC is gender equal. Perhaps changing the wording to say "scheduled to feature" would be better. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have a source for this? That would help to give us suitable wording. And I'll just note that the lead is meant to be a summary of things described in detail elsewhere in the article, but this doesn't seem to be the case here. HiLo48 (talk) 04:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are some sources: More can be seen in a Google Search 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 04:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identical number of athletes between men and women? 

message: I just created an article for Thomas Jolly. He is the artistic director of the opening ceremonies. Thriley (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Thomas Jolly (artist)]]
Talk:B38 (New York City bus)

message: mentions four blocks of unused trackage on Bridge Street from Front Street to the East River. --NE2 01:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Could you upload the image you took of the poster for bus stop consolidation for the B38 to Commons or Flickr so it could be used as a source? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be useful to have as a source. Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

text: > Here ya go at  Mtattrain (talk) 15:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus stop consolidation 

message: You reverted back this unsourced content . The citation request has sat there unfilled for 17 years and I could not find the information before I removed the content. Is this true? How do we know it? Per WP:ONUS challenged content should not be put back into an article, and neither should there be unverified claims. The information is in the page history, and now it is linked here in talk. It should be removed until a citation is found. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Lease
Talk:B41 (New York City bus)

message: The sentence, "After Grand Army Plaza, buses make a stop at Eastern Pkwy and run through Prospect Park until Empire Blvd," is not quite accurate. After leaving Eastern Parkway the B-41 bus runs to Empire Boulevard between the Brooklyn Botanic Garden on the northeast side of Flatbush Ave. and Prospect Park on the southwest side of Flatbush Ave. No buses run through Prospect Park. This can be seen on the Brooklyn bus map http://web.mta.info/nyct/maps/busbkln.pdf and the B-41 bus schedule http://web.mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/bkln/b041cur.pdf.
R. Paul Martin (talk) 08:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route
Talk:B25 (New York City bus)

message: From Jamaica Trolleys by Vincent Seyfried, 1953:
:"In April 1936 the Independent subway, whose "A" line had been operating from the Bronx to Church Ave. since October 1933, opened its [Fulton Street Line.] To give access to this new Rockaway Ave. Station to residents of Cypress Hills and Woodhaven, the [...?] management extended the Jamaica Ave. trolley service from Broadway, the old terminal, westward along Fulton St. to a newly constructed loop at Hopkinson Ave. The new service opened on the same morning as the subway (April 9th) and operated on both weekdays and Sundays. On the same day Fulton St. trolleys were extended along Fulton St. beyond Broadway, their old terminal, out to Crescent St. and Jamaica Ave. The new "A" line of the Independent subway was immensely popular at the time, not only because it was a novelty, but because it gave unusually fast, direct service into New York. This Jamaica Avenue service into the Hopkinson Loop continued right [...?] to the end of 1947. The middle and late 30's witnessed the gradual isolation of the Jamaica Ave. line. In December of 1933 the Jamaica Central Rys. motorized their lines, ending 37 years of joint operation through the old village of Jamaica, and leaving the avenue east of 168th St. to the city line without trolleys.
--NE2 15:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:B33 (New York City bus)

message: Could these be moved to B33 (New York City bus)? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for moving the B68. Could you also do this one? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , did this one as well. epicgenius (talk) 16:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:B54 (New York City bus)

message: Good morning (GMT time); I have reviewed this article on ,     (UTC) in accordance with the Good Article (GA) criteria. I have concluded that, in my opinion, the article has failed one or more categories and is therefore denied GA status. In order to provide constructive criticism, I have below listed one or more of my reasons for failing the article, beside the relevant criteria title; this should be taken as advice for improvement, rather than a list of reasons for failing.
#Well-written: Failed
::"...the prose is comprehensible, the grammar is correct, and the structure is clear at first reading..." - the article is set out in a very messy format, and is not at all tidy; this detracts from the quality of the article.
#Factually accurate: Pass
#Broad: Pass
#Neutrally written: Pass
#Stable: Pass
#Well-referenced: Pass
#Images: Fail
::"..It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic..." - there are no images.
My condolences to the lead editors - your hard work has been informally recognised; just keep it up, and do not be disheartened!
Feel free to renominate the article when the above improvements have been made, or alternatively seek a GA Review or discuss my decision at my talk page if you believe I have been misguided.
Sincerest regards,anthonycfc [talk] 05:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:GA|Good Article]] [[WP:GAC|'''Nomination''']] 