Talk:OUTeverywhere

message: This article needs a huge clean up. Many of the claims are not sourced, and never have been, and should be removed if they cannot be verified. The article currently relies on too many references to the website itself, which is obviously not an independent reliable source. Teppic74 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please remember this is not a BLP. Articles about companies often reference the company website or annual reports and so long as the information is not unduly self serving or non-neutral this is not a problem against policy. Further not every sentence in an article requires a footnoted citation if the facts are obvious or easy to check using a primary referenced source (in this case the organization's website which includes simple facts on date of foundation, staff and strategy). In practice there are articles with no footnotes but with an identified source and this type of format also fulfils the verification policy. Fæ (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And in the case when the only real source is the company's own website? That's the issue that needs fixing (aside from the multiple claims about its history, which have no source at all). Teppic74 (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, within the criteria I already mentioned. If you do not wish to trust to my experience you can always ask for another opinion on WP:3O, at the moment I feel like our discussion is going in circles, so having someone else explain You don't need to cite that the sky is blue might be more useful for you. Thanks Fæ (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't talking about the obvious information, but the descriptions of history and growth, company affiliations, etc. which are not obvious and need sources. Teppic74 (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on OUTeverywhere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070312014101/http://www.dailystar.co.uk:80/news_detail.html?sku=374 to http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news_detail.html?sku=374
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on OUTeverywhere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910073417/http://www.timeout.com/london/gay/features/3317/Gay_bowling.html to http://www.timeout.com/london/gay/features/3317/Gay_bowling.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003431640,,00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www2.disappointment.com/old/blaine/030918.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www2.disappointment.com/old/blaine/030909.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www2.disappointment.com/old/blaine/030911.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified