lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A Second Chance At Eden

message: Content was:
A Second Chance at Eden is a 1998 book by British science fiction author Peter F. Hamilton. It is a series of six short stories and one long novella, most featuring the affinity technology also found in Hamilton's massive The Night's Dawn Trilogy.
Five of the short stories had been previously published, and were re-cast in the Confederation timeline for this collection, of which the centrepiece is the title novella. The book is laid out in chronological order, with the stories intercalated with the Confederation timeline as found in the three Night's Dawn volumes.
===Contents===
*"Sonnie's Edge" (set on Earth, 2070) (first published 1991)
*"A Second Chance at Eden" (Jupiter, 2090)
*"New Days Old Times" (Nyvan, 2245)
*"Candy Buds" (Tropicana, 2393) (first published 1992)
*"Deathday" (Jubarra, 2405) (first published 1991)
*"The Lives and Loves of Tiarella Rosa" (Tropicana, 2447) (first published 1993 as "Spare Capacity")
*"Escape Route" (Sonora Asteroid, 2586) (first published 1997)
Scoo 10:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected on 28 Feb 2006 

message: *"Sonnie's Edge" (set on Earth, 2070) (first published 1991)
*"A Second Chance at Eden" (Jupiter, 2090)
*"New Days Old Times" (Nyvan, 2245)
*"Candy Buds" (Tropicana, 2393) (first published 1992)
*"Deathday" (Jubarra, 2405) (first published 1991)
*"The Lives and Loves of Tiarella Rosa" (Tropicana, 2447) (first published 1993 as "Spare Capacity")
*"Escape Route" (Sonora Asteroid, 2586) (first published 1997)
Scoo 10:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contents
Talk:Laxey A.F.C.

message: Should this page not be redirected to Laxey F.C.? On the club's own website they are known as Laxey Football Club, not Laxey Association Football Club. --MacTire02 (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A.F.C. or F.C. 

message: It says 7 ??? Stijnsation (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capacity 
Talk:Aliens versus Predator versus The Terminator

message: umm maybe i have read the wrong comic but seriously, this isn't even slightly what AvPvT is about
*Not the only one! I have a friend who says the same thing. Digifiend 12:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would mind TERRIBLY... Muhahahahahaha. As the person who originally posted the complaint in the talk page, i say go for it... its wrong and even a badly written synopsis is better than an incorrect one :) (Not implying that you would write it badly, just saying) WookMuff 11:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assesment required
Talk:To the Last Man (Grey novel)

message: Should there be a separate mention of the various film adaptations? The 1923 and 1933 film adaptations are mentioned in the "See Also," but I feel like there should be mentioned somewhere the 2009 gay porno loosely based upon the novel "To The Last Man: The Gathering Storm" as well as how the "Gunslingers" TV movie "Gunslingers: To The Last Man" clearly pays homage to and references the novel. 174.240.18.112 (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptations
Template talk:Lts

message: # delete any usage and references to interwikitmp-grp
# inside a noinclude block, include 
# If you need a guide, the meta page is good to copy as is. {{I}Just follow the link on interwikitmp-grp, cut that, and [Ctrl]-[A] on this page, then paste down over it.
# thanks // FrankB 10:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope that's done. I'm not a template kinda guy; if its not working, the best thing to do is create a copy of the exact text you want pasting in on a new subpage of this talk! --Robdurbar 13:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit needed 

message: In the first sentence, the link to  is to the non-existent Meta template, rather than the Wikipedia template. Libcub (talk) 05:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That link's on the documentation page, you should be able to edit it yourself. --ais523 19:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link
Talk:Line feed

message: The article says that 
:CRLF was eventually adopted as the standard line ending for network traffic, a decision which, in retrospect, is generally considered to be a mistake.
Why? Who said this? --surueña 11:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://www.rfc-editor.org/EOLstory.txt TMC1221 01:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Standard line ending for network traffic

message: The redirect of LF to NL is inappropriate. If Line Feed is not notable enough to warrant a separate article, then the redirect should be removed, unless there is a line feed section in another article to which it can point. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the editor you're looking for;  is. Regardless, your assertion "" is incorrect. Please see WP:R#DELETE for valid reasons for removing redirects (it sounds like you've misread and/or misunderstood #10). If you wish to further expound on LF, beyond what is currently written on NL, please edit NL.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the ping  - and  if you still feel the redirect is inappropriate, after reading the link Tom.Reding gave you above, the appropriate forum is WP:RFD. Onel5969 TT me 14:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate redirect
Talk:Joe Moakley

message: The birth-death dates at the top say that he died on May 31st, but the article mentions twice that it was May 28th.  Which was it?
Delaney
:May 28, 2001 according to the Boston Globe obit. Thanks for the correction. Rhobite 12:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death? 

message: Strange that this article leaves out the congressional task force that Moakley led that investigated the murder of 6 Jesuit priests, their housekeeper and her daughter by Salvadoran military forces in 1989.  The publication of the Moakley Commission's report contributed to the 1992 peace accords that ended the 12 year civil war.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Positive deviant (talk • contribs) 00:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moakley Commission in El Salvador 

message: ..but Joe tells me he takes back his name from the federal court house. Juan Riley (talk) 23:35, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know not a forum.... 
Talk:Atlantis in popular culture

message: What about Atlantis, Beyond Atlantis and Beyond Atlantis II? All three are PC games made by Cryo. Should the article include these?--60.224.253.160 11:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If those are creative works where Atlantis is a major part of the storyline, be bold and add them! :) --Sparky Lurkdragon 11:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The things listed there are the same that are listed here: Fictional works that relate to Atlantis. --84.178.82.79 07:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Take over the Atlantis in popular culture part of the Atlantis article 

message: * "Letters from Atlantis", a novel by Robert Silverberg in which the soul of a man from the future and the one from a ruler of Atlantis 20000 years before join.
* The song "Atlantis" by Mark Boals, in the album "Ring of Fire".
* The whole "V: A New Mythology Suite" album by Symphony X is a concept about Atlantis and its influence upon Egypt. -- DelusionsMaster 13:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more works about Atlantis 

message: Should the red links to non-existent articles continue to be there, or should the links be removed, leaving just the name? Many of those non-existent articles will never be created. 144.214.42.129 (talk) 01:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Take out the red links themselves, leaving the names (you may need to italicize them). If that leaves no blue links, take out the whole entry, which I just did with the Theatre section to save you some work. Dougweller (talk) 04:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links 
Talk:Mumbai Mirror

message: Some pruning needs to be done. Also as a defunct newspaper that's not in daily print anymore but weekly, this article does make it read like a promotion. BombaiyyaMag (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetitive Parts

message: Excessive edits from now blocked sock and likely UPE. Tagging as it it need a thorough check for NPOV, verify sources, etc. CNMall41 (talk) 01:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (February 2024)
Talk:Adolfo Díaz

message: How comes that he lived from 1877-1964 but was born already in 1875 - seems to be impossible?--80.134.116.214 11:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Elsewhere (album)

message: From the article: 
:"As of July 19, 2006, St. Elsewhere has reached gold status, selling 561,215 copies as of July 23, 2006" 
I removed the sentence for now, because it's both unsourced and doesn't even say in which country. And the double date is a little wierd. --Fritz S. (Talk) 18:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gold?

message: Recently a wikipedia admin removed the link to RMR's review of St. Elsewhere. I was told that I can't add the link because I work for Rock Music Review. That's fine, I didn't realize that would be an issue. Unfortunately that apparently meant ALL links to RMR reviews on ALL album pages added by ANY user were deleted. I was told I could request the link be added in the talk page, so here I am. Anyone? Jackola 17:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are already quite a number of reviews in the article and I think RockMusicReview.com isn't really notable enough to be included (no Wiki article; Alexa ranking of over 4,000,000). --Fritz S. (Talk) 18:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Add Review from RockMusicReview.com

message: Should mention be made of the deluxe edition coming out on November 7th? Brand Eks 06:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a deluxe edition? Sure, that definitely should be montioned.--Fritz S. (Talk) 10:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It will apparently have the four videos that have come out so far with it plus some other fun stuff.  Makes me glad I waited to get the album! Brand Eks 07:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deluxe Edition

message: Is it "presumable" to believe that the title of the album was specifically a reference to the NBC show, and not to the term for poor urban hospitals?
the name also shows up in a tribe called quest song ("award tour") and i'm sure gnarls is very much into tribe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.70.27.27 (talk) 20:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NBC Show

message: I am personally adding a section to music articles that go over the specific sound of the song, not where it comes from. If you want to delete it for a spefcifc reason, please do, if you think this is a good idea, ill do it for other albums I own. Please tell me on my talk page so I know. User:KoRoBeNiKi  —Preceding comment was added at 16:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Idea
Talk:Flag of Connecticut

message: It has one strange proprtion. 68.39.174.238 12:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag Proportion 
Talk:List of hip hop record labels

message: I've created a category, :Category:Hip hop labels.  You might find it convenient for filling this up.  Peace, --Urthogie 12:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to :Category:Hip hop record labels. See: HERE. Visor 08:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please read the following pages WP:NOT#LINK and WP:EL before adding external links to this list.  If the label is indeed noteable, then the link would sit on the label's own article page and not here. Lugnuts 09:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All red links have been removed.  Some have been there for months or are constantly deleted via AFD.  Please feel free to add labels that aren't here already, provided they can meet WP:CORP. Lugnuts 08:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to article editors
Talk:Viby J

message: The article give the impression that the picture shows how the center looked when it opened. That is however not the case. Originally there were six seperate buildings. In the 1980's two of them were expanded closing one of the entrances to the center, and the entire area between the buildings were covered with a large glass roof. The hotel in the left and the red bricks which can dimly be seen in the right side of the picture are original, everything between those is new. Kasperd 12:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Viby Centret 

message: Should this article mention companies in Viby J? If such information is to be included in the article, there are more important companies to mention than JP. Arla Foods and Ericsson Telebit just to mention a few. Kasperd 20:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies in Viby J 
Talk:Guidelines for National Unification

message: Since there is a copy of the Guidelines at WikiSource (but without any attribution to the translation—which is pretty typical of translations on the Wikipedia and sister projects), this article needs a summary of the Guidelines (and don't tell me ). 4.232.105.89 12:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary?
Talk:Russo-Persian War (1804–1813)

message: Is there a possibility of citing some? Dsol 14:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't remove the tag until some sources have been found.  I'm not saying every fact needs a footnote, but there should be at least one work listed as a reference for the curious reader.  This article was linked from the front page and not to have any references looks bad, as well as violating WP:V. Dsol 17:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most articles in Wikipedia do not cite sources. Refs are mandatory only when you dispute some fact or another. Which facts do you dispute and find "unverifiable"? --Ghirla -трёп- 12:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I put more info can someone check to see if it is spelled correctly and grammatical.
Or fix it with already standing information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.121.242.162 (talk) 00:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 

message: I added one Campaign box  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cauca50 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign box
Talk:Mangrove black hawk

message: Is there a methodology to the onomatepoeia of birdsong?  For instance what is the difference between 'spink' and 'speenk'?  Is this even helpful information in any way?  Ddddan 22:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is helpful. 184.69.174.194 (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  spink-speenk-speenk-spink-spink-spink...? 

message: Should this be included in the article? Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 03:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for posting. I cropped it to make the bird bigger, and inserted it. I suppose the subtitle could mention that he is only pretty certain it is a mbh, but it is listed in the picture info. 184.69.174.194 (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: This section in the lead needs clarification for non-biologists. 
"but all individuals from western Panama and northwards are nominate common black hawk."
My mind wants a plural "hawks", "all individuals are _____ hawks", or a better sentence to state it in layman's terms while introducing the word "nominate", which is spelled the same as the more common elective process. TX   
: Also, it would be helpful if an ornithologist could weigh in on what the defining difference is that makes it a subspecies. Is it just range, or is there morphology involved.  184.69.174.194 (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominate is confusing! Help!
Talk:2006 Thai general election

message: I remove last paragraph. If opposition really call for boycott, it couldn't automatically imply that southern part will have no representative or forced to vote for indenpendent party only.
--Underexpose 23:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Thailand 

message: Does anyone know where I can find maps of the constituency boundaries? I have tried asking the Electoral Commission, but they seem to think the boundaries are a state secret and won't let me see them, even when I offered to come to their offices and copy them myself. I have seen older boundaries at several websites, but not the current ones. Any suggestions? Adam 08:06, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: are you looking for a boundaries information for this upcoming election? there is an information in Thai on Electoral Commission website. if you looking specific information and need help translating, let me know.--underexpose 09:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

text: yes, the information is provided in table format; you could overlay into a map by yourself, but as you said, it would be time consuming. if i found a graphical version of this information, i will let you know --underexpose 23:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Constituency boundaries

message: The ECT will be posting results (in Thai of course), here. If anyone knows of an English-language website posting results, please let me know. I can read the Thai alphabet, but verrrry slowly. Adam 01:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Drill-down to current unofficial results is here --Brianmc 19:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Results

message: Can anyone advise me if the ECT website has a table showing the number of registered voters in each constituency? Adam 09:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Next question

message: Now that there is going to be a second election this year, this article will need to be renamed Thailand legislative election, April 2006 and new article created Thailand legislative election, October 2006. Adam 23:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Done. —Nightstallion (?) 12:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand... since it's now 2007 and there hasn't been the election yet, I suggest it be renamed back. 68.39.174.238 20:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article
Talk:Restore Iraqi Oil

message: I removed the following addition to the Restore Iraq Oil article:
Note: The above statement is not correct.  KBR Halliburton never received a no-bid contract.  Operation "Restore Iraqi Oil" was invoked under a contract that KBR won in a competitive bid process.  The contract is referred to as LOGCAP (Logistical Civilian Augmentation Program) and is managed by the US Army.  KBR won the first LOGCAP contract, Dyncorp the second, and KBR the current one, dubbed "LOGCAP III."  It's a contingency-based contract that is invoked at the convenience of the Army.  Because the contract is a kind of retainer, specific orders are not competitively bid (as the overall contract was) and thus the reason for the confusion.
When the contract was invoked during the Balkans crisis under the administration of President Clinton, there was no controversy and very little scrutiny of the contract.  KBR performed under this agreement in the Balkans for over 10 years and still maintains a LOGCAP presence there to this day. It was only after the Second Gulf War that the LOGCAP contract was made a political issue by opponents of President Bush and Vice President Cheney.
This is not really an appropriate way to update the article. If you believe a previous statement in the article is incorrect, find a source, update the incorrect section (don't just add a note saying it's incorrect, fix it), and cite it appropriately. --JerryOrr 12:46, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction of statement
Talk:Telekom Malaysia

message: Have made some minor changes, and will be adding more citations/references soon.
--Malaysiarocks 20:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated 

message: I propose that the following articles be merged into Telekom Malaysia:
* Cyberjaya satellite earth station
* Kuantan satellite earth station
* Labuan teleport
* Malacca Teleport
* Wangsa Maju teleport
The individual stations' articles don't cite any sources and except for their location, I can't find reliable references for them (WikiProject Unreferenced articles). I also doubt that the additional information is noteworthy. The locations are already listed in the Telekom Malaysia article, so even if the additional information would be merged, it wouldn't cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.  Recdep (talk) 08:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Making major changes, updates and revisions based on content directly from Telekom Malaysia's digital comms department. NealAtIPG (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major update / revamp 

message: Does Team Malaysia belongs to Telekom Malaysia?--Hongqilim (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: About Team Malaysia

message: I don't think this article needs a history going back to the 19th Century, maybe its a better fit for Telecommunications in Malaysia? RidinTheWaves (talk) 22:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging content
Talk:Royal Wardrobe

message: This is a subject that needs further research, especially for a more complete history both during its sojourn in the Tower of London and afterwards in its final location.
The actual location of the building can be seen in some of the drawings of Old St Pauls but precise identification awaits someone with more knowledge than my humble self. --Surgeonsmate 12:54, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genesis
Talk:Best In Show (album)

message: I'm having trouble working out the original artists of some songs - if anyone not as stupid as me reads this, could they check it out? -SCC 12:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus Covers Disc 
Talk:Arabesque-pop music

message: Tarkan is NOT a performer of Arabesque-pop music - especially when there is no such genre and somebody has just made it up. In Turkey there is no such sound - the closes can arguably could be a genre known as "fantazi" which is a mixture of belly-dancing beats with Arabic melodies. Tarkan dueting with an Arabesque singer (NOT arabesque pop) doesn't make him a performer in this non-existent genre. 82.145.231.52 01:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This "article" reads like an advertisement for an album.  I'm tempted to nominate if for deletion, but I don't know enough about the subject to do so.  So, instead, I am going to delete all of the Original research, opinions and POV.--WilliamThweatt 02:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sven Linderot

message: I remove a passage in my latest edit. It does not take into account differences between Sillén and Linderot. In fact the political project of Linderot (Mass Line) was quite different from that of Sillén (Class against Class). Read the history of the party as described by KPML(r), and you'll see that they are critical towards Linderot. --Soman 13:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalinist road
Talk:Matt Skelton

message: I'm not sure what style Skelton uses. He is often described as having an unusual way of fighting but I am unsure if this means unorthodox or if unorthodox would have a specific meaning within boxing? Also I'm not sure how we can go about getting a picture to use for this that is allowed under GNU?--Wikipediatastic 13:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's usually Orthodox, or Southpaw.  Left lead or right lead.  Being a non-professional disaster looking fighter, like Skelton, isn't really a boxing "style" as should be used in the infobox.  In this case though it seems to fit. ->Btl 02:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxing Style 

message: Why is WBU considered as "Lightly regarded" (something not included on the wiki entry about it) when some of the champions to have held WBU belts (Hatton, Foreman, Sanders etc) were pretty well respected fighters? (37.31.81.116 (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WBU 'lightly regarded'