lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hurricane Sergio (2006)

message: #NPOV: Pass
#Well-written: Its hink, it'll pass.
#Stability: Pass
#Images: Pass
#Refs: Pass
#Broad: Pass
#Factually Accurate: Pass
Well done on my choice. Didn't expect this much info.Mitchazenia 17:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Assessment

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after it passed in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: From Talk:Hurricane Kristy (2006), it appears you are open for merging this article, but I'm leaning towards opposing this merge because this is a record breaker storm, ala Hurricane Epsilon (2005).  Do you really believe that this article could be sustained, and at least could be improvable into FA? SMB99thx my edits 08:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose and what about the merge momitorium? About not merging articles? I made a request at WP: AN to close the discussion. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 18:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not starting a discussion about merging this article. What I'm doing is to evaluate if this article is expandable - It's one of many points suggested in the moratorium. SMB99thx my edits! 22:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

text: To , no I don't think this article could be improved into a featured article. It only dropped 1.97 inches of rainfall, so there's little chance for flooding and other impacts that would normally beef up an article. Also, its records are rather trivial, and it being one of two November storms was tied by 2015. I removed the ACE bit, since November 2015 is higher w Sandra. , the moratorium (which is what I believe you meant) is an agreement among editors to halt these discussions. We can wait for after the moratorium to actually implement the merge. I think it's good to look at our older articles, as sometimes they're built up with lengthy met histories (which can be summarized a bit better) and trivial records. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  20:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluating this article
Talk:Sporterising

message: Good article, but where do commercial guns like the PS90 fit? This is more of a personal question, but I would think they would deserve some mention. JVkamp 21:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just one question.. 

message: IMHO, sporterizing is NOT political in any way. It's the act of taking a military surplus rifle and adapting it to hunting or other sport uses. I've never heard of the term being applied any other way. The article should focus on these technical issues rather than dragging pro and anti gun control into it. For instance, many surplus military rifles (being by definition quite old and obsolescent) have sights which are not suitable for hunting and stocks meant to accept bayonets, also not useful for hunting. Sporterizing usually means, in this case, replacing the original sights with modern sights or a scope, and cutting the forestock down. This is purely subjective, but the guns that I've most often seen sporterized are Mauser 95-98s, M1 Garands, and Lee-Enfield type rifles. I'll try to get some comparative photos together for the article at some point. Msaunier (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're referring to the "modifying for compliance" section - it seems to have a proper reference to support it. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not. Modifying a weapon for compliance is, IMHO, not (necessarily) sporterization, since this could (potentially) apply to weapons not used for sport. I suppose I'm arguing the definition - how I see it, sporterization is taking a weapon (usually a surplus rifle) and adapting it for sport (which is to say, hunting and target shooting). Modifying, say, a MAC-10 for import would not apply, since it's not a gun that can reasonably be used for sport in either it's modified or unmodified state. Msaunier (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is politically biased when it should be strictly technical
Talk:Thatta

message: Can somebody explain the origin of Thatta and its ancient History?
burdak (talk) 09:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Thatta 

message: Thatta is not on the world heritage site. The earlier name was historical monuments of Thatta was slightly incorrect and the government changed the name in 2009 to Historical Monuments at Makli, Thatta to define the exact world heritage site. Also the Shah Jahan Mosque in the city is separately listed on the tentative list since 1993 - see here. The mosque mentioned in the listing is at Dabgir which can be seen here Rzafar (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: World Heritage
Talk:Northern Ireland national football B team

message: Should this page not redirect to the republic of ireland team :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.41.30 (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Talk:QX (magazine)

message: Dejtingsajter för killar som gillar killar har blivit en stor marknad över hela världen.  Sajterna besöks av killar som är nyfikna eller som  hoppas finna kärlek, vänskap eller bara sex.  De senaste 3-4 åren har dessa  sajter poppat upp som svampar ur jorden.  Sajterna har setts som potentiella guldgruvor vilket har gjort att användarna har betalat medlemsavgifter för en service som borde vara gratis. Istället borde inkomsterna finansieras på annat sätt, exempelvis genom reklamintäkter eller produktförsäljning.  Ett bra exempel på detta är sajten MyCrusing, som jag hittade på nätet.
MyCrusing är helt gratis och man behöver inte, som på andra sajter, betala för olika tjänster och aktiviteter.  Dessutom är MyCrusing utrustat med fler och fler unika funktioner än genomsnittet, den är snygg i designen,  lätt att navigera och användarvänlig. MyCrusing  finns tillgänglig på 17 olika språk, en del av dessa inte helt perfekta, men det hoppas vi att man ska ordna framöver.
Användarprofilen har snygg layout och har möjlighet att visa mycket  information om profilanvändaren så vill, inkluderande profilbild, fotoalbum, videoclips  och utrymme för beskrivning med fritext. 
Sökfunktionen på MyCrusing är lätt att använda och där kan du söka på användarnamn, bilder, stad, land, ålder och sexuell orientering (aktiv/passiv/bi/gay/straight/ annat).
Dock. Den funktion på MyCrusing som jag gillar allra bäst och som fick mig att skriva denna artikel är funktionen ”Gay Chat ”. Denna chat kan man använda på två olika sätt (och den är gratis till skillnad från andra sajter som tar betalt för denna service). Det finns  ”One-on-one” chat där du kan chatta direkt med den du vill, antingen på traditionellt vis eller med video chat och så finns det en Gay chat som är en huvud chat där du kan chatta med alla som är inloggade på chatten och även se dem på kamera om den är öppen. Det går att se upp till fyra personers  kameror åt gången.
Det finns ännu en godbit som jag inte har nämnt och det är Google map locator där man kan se avståndet till den man chattar med och var denne befinner sig oavsett var i världen det är.
Det finns förstås mer att utforska på MyCrusing och det kan hända att jag återkommer med en artikel i framtiden.  Jag rekommenderar den nyfikne att bli medlem
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Topman62 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you are asking for text to be translated, talk pages should stick to English on the English Wikipedia. In accordance with WP:TALKNO and WP:NOTFORUM, I have collapsed your note on the basis that it appears to be an attempt to misuse this talk page as a forum or for free advertising. Please supply your own translated version in English if you disagree. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 15:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varför betala för medlemsskap på Gaydating sajt?
Talk:Kitti Ping Yung

message: Wind Blossom - daughter or granddaughter? Every ref I see on Wikipedia says granddaughter, but she is identified as Kitti Ping's daughter in Dragonsblood (see for instance p. 25). I don't have another book handy to check, and I know Todd McCaffrey is said to sometimes go against canon, but this seems unlikely in regard to geneologies of major characters. 
Hierophany 03:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my copy of Dragonsdawn, Wind Blossom is clearly and repeatedly identified as a granddaughter of Kitti Ping.  Either Todd McCaffrey's gone against canon or there're some unconventional breeding practices in the Yung family. Bhamv 05:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:City High-Middle School

message: Sorry, DFlav, but is the production you are talking about at all known outside of City? It strikes me as a little outside NPOV the way it is now, no offense to ms. Coriveau. Kalai Eljahn (talk) 00:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Look, I think it's funny, too, but constantly adding Droski to the article does constitute vandalism, and further edits of this nature will be reported as part of the Wikipedia block process.
Namaste.
Le fantome de l'opera (talk) 23:39, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dan Droski

message: Keeping Start class rating as requires additional references. Would benefit from pictures. Please refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines for tips to improve the article further. Hope that proves helpful. Good luck! Duffit5 (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Aror

message: Hi wikipedia , user Nirmohiji is making regular edits , with no source that Aror was capital of Arorh dynasty . The whole story about parshuram has also no source and is cooked up . 
Infact i have put up a reliable source about Aror that it was capital of Ror dynasty .Please look into this matter . Rudradaman127 (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removal from Wikipedia can't erase dynasty Anuj Choudhary Ror (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Ror dynasty is well documented officially by govt of pakistan and govt of india , and its presence is still felt in sindh today even . removing it from wikipedia cant erase a well established dynasty accepted all over . Rudradaman127 (talk) 01:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynasty claims  

message: User:Nirmohiji is repeatedly doing vandalism on page and adding unreliable and random sources on this page , as no one is checking their reliablity . Even most of the references he have mentioned do not contain a single word , of what he has quoted . There is no such thing as Arora Dynasty ever , but he is repeatedly quoting and editing Aror Dynasty on the page , with any random source . 
Even the story of parshuram is being added repeatedly with random unreliable source , which is faux , there is no such story in hindu puranas and in those books , which he had added in reference . Please take action . Rudradaman127 (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated vandalism and adding random & unreliable sources by user: Nirmohiji  

message: Anuj Choudhary Ror and Rudradaman127 (talk) are making similar disruptive edits, are probably the same. Roundish Utcursch Kindly acknowledge the issue. Nirmohiji (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sockpuppetry claim
Talk:London Stone (riparian)

message: A London Assembly standard letter re access to the River Thames - PDF (view as HTML) states every such right [of access] must have been in existence since 1189. It does not explain why 1189 but that year may well be the year of purchase from Dick 1 which Spelthorne thinks was 1197. -- RHaworth 03:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Since 1189" means "Since time immemorial". MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 16:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: Quote: It was also the next bridge upstream from London Bridge, a distance of 31 km as the crow flies.
I thought Kingston-upon-Thames bridge (built in the 12th century) was the next bridge upstream from London Bridge in medieval times. Can anyone confirm the Staines claim? John O'London (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Staines Bridge
Talk:Kotri

message: Kotri has grown more than any other city in Pakistan since 1998, does anyone have any sources/information as to why or how this happened? --Qtz arenite (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growth in recent decades?
Talk:Isra University

message: I found this article to be a gushing and hyperbolic brochure for the university, which is inappropriate for Wikipedia.  I've removed all POV material.  If someone wants to read the brochure, they can use the link.
Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam. Accounting4Taste 21:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.isra.edu.pk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=190. Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Reg porter (talk) 22:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Feldgendarmerie

message: Feldgendarmerie as a whole is not a french word. gendarmerie is. ill change that.--Tresckow 03:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The Feldgendarmerie was under the direct control of the German High Command O.K.H (Oberkommando des Heeres). A Feldgendarmerie General Major[who?]."
Its not a matter of a who (person) but a position, General der Feldgendarmerie. So the [who?] should be removed. 193.11.50.23 (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   A Feldgendarmerie General Major[who?], 

message: Edited and added some informations.
Sidecars with mounted MGs were not regulary used by the Feldgendarmerie. The majority of their lighter vehicles were motorcycles and cars, they had just a few sidecars. The sidecars with maounted MGs were typicaly from the so called Kradschuetzen, an extremely fast and heavy armed troop of mechanized infantry, because they had more MGs compared to normal infantry (one MG for a team of three soldiers (driver and two passengers on a sicecar)). But the Kradschuetzen were disbanded after the war in France as a troop of it's own, most of them were integrated into the armoured reconnaissance troops or used as dispatch riders. 
Feldgendarmen, Feldjaeger, Militaerpolizisten, Karlheinz Boeckle, Motorbuchverlag Stuttgart 1987, 
Kraeder der Wehrmacht, Horst Hinrichsen, Podzun-Palls-Verlag/Nebelverlag, 
Kradschuetzen. Die Geschichte der schnellsten Truppe des Heeres, Hasso Erb, Motorbuchverlag Stuttgart, 978-3879437825
ReinickendorferFuchs (talk) 12:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Early History/Other MP Troops
Talk:Salt Lake Metro

message: I created a redirect and merged the Salt Lake Metro article with the related QSaltLake article on Feb. 25. The redirect was undone a few hours later without a stated reason, but the merged text remains a part of the QSaltLake article and has been improved with additional references, citations and links. The Salt Lake Metro article hasn't been so improved, and proves the need for a merged article. As such, there now exists two, very similar, articles.
I wasn't part of the discussion to delete the Salt Lake Metro article, and didn't know about the disussion until the redirect was undone. The result of the discussion was to keep the article, which should mean that a valid redirect and merger is in order.
My reason to merge the articles, and two others (stubs), was that: 1) all the articles relate because the business projects which are their subjects were and are owned by the same person; 2) the most recent and largest of the articles is the QSaltLake article, and should logically include the older and smaller articles as part of its business history; 3) the information included in each of the three or more independent articles complements the others and should, therefore, reside in a single article; 4) maintaining three or more independent articles about different business projects is difficult and encourages disparate or redundant references, citations and links; and 5) doing so "is common practice, known as blank-and-redirect" and "is supported by the guideline to be bold when editing" according to WP:BLAR.
As described in the QSaltLake article citations and links, the QSaltLake publication is the legal successor to the Salt Lake Metro publication, and continues to be owned by one of the original Salt Lake Metro owners. The owner paid the business debt of Salt Lake Metro after creating QSaltLake and, as such, gained sole ownership. So, merging the articles is legal, logical and supported by WP to maintain single, unambiguous articles, when possible.
If the verifiable information was merged and improved (not deleted as discussed previously), shouldn't the redirect be restored? I encourage you to do so. Thanks! QSSVbibi6N76J (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all for it.  The article as in contains barely any refs.  Two arn't being used and the 3rd one supports this redirect.--v/r - TP 01:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Salt Lake Metro merger and redirect be restored?
Talk:Pink Paper

message: "Pink paper" was (is?) the term for a British parliamentary document, printed on pink paper, which gave details of papers that were presented to Parliament or printed by orders of the government. See e.g. Jonathon Green's Newspeak dictionary (1984). Equinox ◑ 03:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing sense: the parliamentary "pink paper"
Talk:Albert Cobo

message: This article is clearly written from an anti-Cobo view. It begins by ignoring the non-partisan nature of Detroit mayoral elections. It discounts the concerns of those who supported Cobo, and engages in various smears on him that seem to not even try to abide by Neutral point of view guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremly biased article 

message: We need to source Cobo backing freeways better. We also need a lot more sourcing on who wanted freeways in general. People who live at 7 Mile and Telegraph are city residents, but their access to the central city is much facilitated by freeways. In Detroit speech too often "suburbanite" is code for "white", whilce "white" is too often code for things that are less than all whites. People need to be careful to choose their words so that they reflect reality. This article is too much based on one side of the views on Cobo and his accomplishments, and uses too many biased words, weasle words, attack words, and unencyclopedic smears.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many unsourced statements
Talk:February 2007 North American blizzard

message: There are a lot of cntags. I think it should be GAR’d. 108.58.27.76 (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAR
Talk:South Aiken High School

message: The following had been tagged as unsourced since March 2011.
:South Aiken won the AAAA State Golf Championship in 2004. The tennis team won the men's tennis state championship in 2002, 2003, and 2004. The men's soccer state championship in 2005(4A) and 2009 (3A). In the 2005 soccer season, South Aiken was ranked second in the Southern Region, and third overall in the United States.
Poking around the SCHSL site, South Aiken did win the boys' 2004 AAAA golf championship.. Boys' tennis lost in the third round in 2002, lost in the first round in 2003,, and lost in the first round in 2004. Boys' soccer won AAAA in 2005 and won AAA in 2008; JL Mann won in 2009. I'm not sure how to verify the rankings, because it doesn't indicate what organization did the rankings. —C.Fred (talk) 03:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, , we don't discuss polls in US high school articles. Also no individual achievement, and rarely anything less than state champions.  Thanks for finding the cites. John from Idegon (talk) 04:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, polls are so opinion-based and not in general use that I'm reluctant to mention them in high school articles. I'm not even sure I'd mention a power ranking in a high school sports article, even though I know of two states that use them for various purposes. —C.Fred (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Power rankings seem like WP:NOTNEWS to me. Altho generally prose is preferred to lists, I find using lists in school articles for athletic achievement cuts down on the crufty, poor excuse for a sports page garbage we frequently end up with. However, if there is something unique to discuss, that's another story. I'm thinking particularly of a school that may have gone 1-15 for the season and end up going all the way in the tournament only to lose in the finals.John from Idegon (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Old unsourced athletics claims
Talk:Uch

message: "Formerly located at the confluence of the Indus and Chenab rivers, it is now removed to Mithankot, some 100 km from that confluence."
The meaning of this sentence is obscure.  Has the location of the city actually moved 100 km ?   Or is the city in the same place,  but the location where the rivers join has moved ?  The second meaning seems more likely,  in which case the sentence should be changed.Eregli bob (talk) 11:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't seen the above when I noticed the same thing, and changed the page accordingly. I just assumed that cities don't move, but confluences in flat land do. Maproom (talk) 15:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange statement 

message: The ancient section of this page included a lot of original research. The text has been copied and pasted between different cities (the citation given shows a search term for Chitral). It is not properly cited, and has many claims which are not even in the source. And beside, the information given is not even important to Uch - it may be better off on a page about the history of punjab if it can be properly sourced. but this page doesnt need a lengthy discussion about changragupta's treaty with selceus etc etc Alishernavoi (talk) 07:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research and out of scope
Talk:Treadmilling

message: I rewrote the section on 'dynamcis of filaments' a bit.
I would say its more streamlined now.
Also I emphasized that different critical concentration
are a true non-equilibrium phenomenon. Without ATP there
is no treadmilling.
A reference is missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.friedrich (talk • contribs) 14:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynamics of filaments 