Talk:British Rail Class 168

message: The great majority of this article is about the 168's technical details. Nothing wrong with that, but this is a general encyclopedia, not a rail-buff's fansite, and as such there should be more info about the interior, passenger reception etc. 86.136.251.6 14:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about some non-techy info? 

message: Tidied up a bit - more operations details possibly are needed.
Also really needs more info on difference between sub classes.
Removed drawings of train liveries - as far as I now they are neither official, nor can be considered accuract - in terms of colour or dimension... Please don't add them - they are effectively "drawings".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FengRail (talk • contribs) 17:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy

message: I have improved the article with information stating that Classes 168/1 and 168/2 are essentially Turbostars. The Class 168/0 could probably be best described as the prototype Turbostar. --Peter Skuce (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Class 168 and Turbostars

message: Hi. Just to let you know, the Commons category for Class 168s is now completely sorted by operator and livery. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons images

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on British Rail Class 168. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080705034433/http://rssb.co.uk/rv_coupling_system_data/list_index.asp to http://www.rssb.co.uk/rv_coupling_system_data/list_index.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on British Rail Class 168. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703123005/http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk:80/about-us/our-train-fleet/ to http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/about-us/our-train-fleet/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :British Rail Class 168's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "TRC1":
From British Rail Class 143: 
From British Rail Class 128: 
From British Rail Class 129: 
From British Rail Class 150: 
From British Rail Class 158: 
From British Rail Class 153: 
From British Rail Class 156: 
From British Rail Class 142: 
From British Rail Class 151: 
From British Rail Class 124: 
From British Rail Class 120: 
From British Rail Class 141: 
From British Rail Class 144: 
From British Rail Class 155: 
From British Rail Class 121: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:British Rail Class 168]] 

message: I think more photos are needed, to show the different look of the 168/0 and 168/1/2/3. Maybe a gallery section? 2A00:23EE:15B8:5387:BB50:B726:3E7C:56E3 (talk) 09:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s what Commons is for IMO. Danners430 (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Also, WP:IG. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More photos needed