lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Journal of High Energy Physics

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.springer.com/physics/particle+and+nuclear+physics/journal/13130. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 03:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Shoot the Runner

message: Was this song actually censored on radio? I remember hearing this song on terrestrial radio several times and never heard a radio edit. The song "Crazy Bitch" by Buckcherry was in heavy rotation around the same time and they didn't censor the word "bitch" when they played that song either. 2600:4040:1298:7E00:C953:AEC5:5C7:E473 (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censored on radio?
Talk:The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era

message: This article says the journal is supported by two groups. The first one is clearly indicated. The Wikipedia article on the Rutherford B Hayes library mentions a list of interests for that library, but the Gilded Age is not one of them. Is there some other source to support this linking? The publisher's page mentions only the society of historians.  --Prairieplant (talk) 06:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rutherford B Hayes library article never mentions focus on the Gilded Age
Talk:Sickened

message: I propose that the page Julie Gregory be merged into this page: the content of her page is (apart from the unsourced statement that she appeared in a minor indy movie) simply a copy of this page. We don't need two pages with pretty much identical material. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No response from anyone: on reflection, it makes more sense to redirect this page to Gregory's, so I'm going to be bold and do so. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Fatigue (disambiguation)

message: I would like to change the existing page from
Fatigue may refer to:
Weariness:
*Fatigue (medical), medical aspects of tiredness in humans
**Chronic fatigue syndrome, an illness of the central nervous system 
***Neurological fatigue
*Battle fatigue, an outdated term for:
**combat stress reaction, a military term which is generally short term
**Posttraumatic stress disorder, a medical term for a long-term disorder
*Voter fatigue, public apathy about elections
*Fatigue (material), failure by repeated stress in materials
*Fatigue (safety), safety implications of tiredness
*Information fatigue, impairment caused by excessive information
Other uses:
*Battledress, military uniform, also known as fatigues
to:
Fatigue may refer to:
*Fatigue (medical), a state of physical and/or mental weakness in humans and other animals, a product of overwork and sleep deprivation, and a symptom of many illnesses. 
*Fatigue (material), the progressive and localized structural damage that occurs when a material is subjected to repeated loading
*Fatigues, battledress 
I have asked for advice on the appropriateness of this proposed edit at Wikipedia_talk:Disambiguation#Fatigue. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed edit
Talk:Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews

message: I have managed to access some very interesting review articles and it seems to me that almost all the articles are free - at least from what I have seen in my short visit there -  and allows full access to articles. In contrast, every other review journal I have come accross out there does not allow access at all. Why is this? Is this just the only journal with review articles that allows access to papers? If not, is there a list in wikipedia with all the open-access review journals? I want to note that I am talking about REVIEW journals in core biological subjects such as molecular/cell biology, biochemistry, genetics, physiology...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by U1012738 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this journal allow access to all its articles?
Talk:Ludwig Wittgenstein/Archive 5

message: The caption in the article claims it is from 1903. However, the summary on the photo's own page gives it as 1901. I assume the caption is correct since obviously the photo has been discussed extensively above, but just thought I raise it. Thanks Thekingofspain 19:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has altered the dating on the picture since it was originally posted in The_Jew_of_Linz Wikipedia article by me. (See the history of the discussion page of the image.) I was not aware this had happened. My thanks to User:Thekingofspain. Walter Langer's book "The Mind of Adolf Hitler" which is a post-war publication of Langer's wartime psychiatric evaluation of Hitler for the OSS (which became the CIA) has it captioned "At the Linz High School, aged 14 (extreme right, upper row). His achool performance was generally mediocre. AP Photo". Langer, of course, is referring to Hitler, not Wittgenstein. For those wanting a complete reference, the publishing details on the page opposite the foreword, read "This edition published 1973 by Book Club Associates By arrangement with Secker & Warburg Ltd. Copyright 1972 by Basic Books, Inc. First published in England 1973 by Martin Secker & Warburg Limited." Since Hitler was born 20th  April 1889 (and Wittgenstein 26th April 1889) if Hitler is given as being 14 in the photograph in Langer's book, it has to have been taken 1903/4, which is the school year in question. Langer wrote the book not as a freelance psychiatrist, out of personal interest, but as an analyst of, and for, the United States government. That is to say, what he wrote was research of the national intelligence agency in wartime against the leader of the main state against which the United States was waging war. One would therefore expect his data to be correct. Kimberley Cornish 22:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The photograph has been deleted from the article by one Cerejota, without any discussion first. I have therefore undone his/her edit. Article changes should feature in discussion first and certainly not be done unilaterally. Any reasons to justify the deletion should be presented first for public assessment and should take into account the already lengthy discussion, above, on the matter.Kimberley Cornish 01:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of W + Hitler photograph
Talk:Optics Letters

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Optics letters. and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 28#Optics letters. until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TartarTorte 21:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Optics letters." listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pacific Northwest Quarterly

message: Besides a fair use image of the cover, illustrations related to the contents might be possible. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Patch antenna

message: I found the terms 'patch antenna', 'microstrip antenna' and 'microstrip patch antenna' used interchangeably in literatures. So I agree with merging.
Rijinatwiki (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge this page with [[Microstrip antenna]]?

message: The gain pattern chart shows that the units are dBi, but this is incorrect. They are just dB, as the fact that the diagram is referenced to 0 clearly indicates that it is a relative antenna gain pattern (normalized to the max) that is being plot, not the gain relative to isotropic. Simply changing the dBi to dB and perhaps making note of the fact that this is the gain relative to the antenna maximum, not relative to isotropic, would fix this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Birge (talk • contribs) 17:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor error in gain pattern chart
Talk:Philosophia Africana

message: I am the Editorial Assistant to Dr. Kalumba, Editor-in-Chief for Philosophia Africana.  I recently updated the wikipedia page for Philosophia Africana so that it accurately reflected the current state of the Journal.  Following that update I found that it was reverted back to its original condition.  The original information on the page is inaccurate and the editorial staff would appreciate it very much if it accurately reflects the current conditions of the journal.  Thank you for your time, and please contact me if you would like to know more about the current state of the Journal.
philafricana @ bsu . edu  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiofoccupymuncie (talk • contribs) 17:23, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of this Article 

message: The notability of this journal is unclear. The Ingenta Connect page is down (temporarily?), the current page only contains a very few articles that were published, and the journal does not seem to be abstracted or indexed anywhere. The connection with the previous incarnation seems tenuous and it is not clear in how far the 2002 award goes in establishing notability. It would be good if sources could be added that show that this article meets either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. --Crusio (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Elephant Bar

message: Yikes, this article should either be canned or expanded. Right now, it's nothing more than advertising. Jon914 08:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:PLOS Genetics

message: Hello, for the sake of transparency I wanted to highlight that edits by Elizamh_710 are made on behalf of the PLOS Genetics staff with the aim of updating the page to make it more informative (the article is/was a stub when I started) but I'd be very happy for others to edit/add comments here if they feel my edits are biased in any way. I'm planning on adding the edits over the next few days, so let me know if there are any problems with this! Elizamh 710 (talk) 15:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Elizamh 710, if you are able to include more references to sources that aren't PLOS-related that would help to make it appear more neutral. Thanks - Lawsonstu (talk) 12:53, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Lawsonstu! I'll make sure to include more non PLOS-related sources where possible. Elizamh 710 (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by Elizamh_710 

message: Hello, for transparency purposes I wanted to disclose that edits by Shbaptista are made on behalf of the PLOS Genetics staff with the aim of updating the page to make it more informative. However, I welcome others to edit/add comments wherever appropriate (especially if they feel my edits are biased in any way). I am planning on adding the edits later this week, so please let me know if there are any problems with this. Thank you very much in advance! --Shbaptista (talk) 18:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating the PLOS Genetics Wikipedia Page
Talk:Speed King

message: Black Night appeared in the Seven ages of rock Documentry on the metal episode (source http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZmnFOs0jdk&feature=related ) and this song(speed king) has been compared to Fireball and Highway star and both songs are listed under metal on their pages( source http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/deeppurple/albums/album/238402/review/6068232/machine_head) they are metal song. Please respond people. Rockgenre (talk)Rockgenre 01:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to say that personally, I don't think either song is "metal" in any definition I personally use - though I would definitely say both were hugely influential on much that IS metal... Fireball and Highway Star do seem like you could call them metal - proto-speed metal, maybe? Luminifer (talk) 03:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This song and Black Night are metal 

message: Shouldn't some info of this music video be added to the page? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_aI99HvKeI&list=UU3SF_Sa_dVWQ09m88nvsXrg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergiohsilva100 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:Publisher Item Identifier

message: I have created a  template to help unify the inclusion and display of PIIs in articles (including inside of citations via  - at least for as long as it does not support a  parameter by itself). In its simplest form, the template takes a PII code as a parameter and displays it, but it is also possible to "construct" a PII from sub-parameters (assuming that the resulting PII is actually assigned). Usage of the template potentially allows for centralized maintenance (appearance, meta-data framing, machine readability, validation of parameters, code indexing).
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template PII for unified appearance and easier maintenance 

message: The article describes a PII format with 17 effective digits plus optional separators. In this format the year for serial publications is described as a two-digit value, however, search engines variously turn up PII codes with 2- or 4-digit year codes. Also, the article describes the id as 5-digit value, while many PII codes in the wild seem to use 7 digits resembling the MR code expanded with leading zeros. Example:
* S0025-5718(1982)0669666-2 (see http://www.ams.org/journals/mcom/1982-39-160/S0025-5718-1982-0669666-2/home.html)
Are there newer revisions of the PII format?
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  PII format differences
Talk:Brisbane Water Secondary College

message: What's a secondary high school?  (i.e. what makes it secondary?)  RJFJR (talk) 17:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: High school is a confusing term; used in Australia and a few other places. Globally, secondary school is the more reorganised term to distinguish from elementary/primary and/or middle schools. The lede and infobox now reads: Brisbane Water Secondary College is a dual-campus government-funded co-educational comprehensive secondary day school... Rangasyd (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spring nicht

message: I;m removing this, because it's not as encyclopedic as it should be. No one needs a play-by-play.--FaerytaleMalice (talk) 18:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Video' section 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Lexicon

message: As pointed out above, this RfC has not been properly certified, as it is not backed up by evidence of "trying and failing to resolve the dispute". Trying to solve a dispute means, by definition, that you try talking with the party involved, not just complaining about them to others. No attempt of that kind seems to have been made.
*At the first incident, of Lexicon's warning against Iwazaki in July (), none of the followup posts even addressed the issue of a perceived impropriety of Lexicon's getting involved as an admin. It was all just a continuation of the ethnic bickering that had apparently gone on before.
*At the second incident (here), nobody approached Lexicon, not even with a notification of the discussion on ANI, as Snowwolf has himself admitted above.
*Of the two users who have signed the RfC, the second, , was apparently not involved in either of the two incidents at all. I can see no signs that he had any interaction with Lexicon during the days in question. (I asked him on his talk page if he could clarify his role, he said he could, but then did nothing.)
Thus, apparently zero attempt at dispute resolution before coming here. Plus, this RfC isn't going anywhere useful, as it is just being used for a continuation of the same kind of mutual bickering. 
I'm not excluding the possibility that there actually was some kind of impropriety involved, but I can't judge this because there's little evidence of how strongly entrenched Lexicon's adversity towards Iwazaki was, if any. Presentation of evidence has been garbled.
This may ultimately need Arbcom to sort out, as such ethnic hotspot conflicts unfortunately often do. In that case, I certainly see a prospect of bans on both sides of the trench.
I'll be prepared to undo this deletion if evidence of prior, good-faith attempts at dispute resolution are yet brought forward. 
Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing this RfC
Talk:Richie Novak

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: MRG, what were the sources? Unless I'm mistaken, we normally specify this.  DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Corrs Chambers Westgarth

message: The name of the page should be changed from Big Six (law firms) to Top Tier (law firms). This is because of the outdated nature for the former term. AustralianLawMan (talk) 03:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Above was intended by User ALM to be placed on  Big Six law firms talk (and later was). 49.177.30.125 (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Ursula Dubosarsky

message: illustrators wiki-link to sportsmen ? --Goesseln (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrator 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Sociological Forum

message: Can somebody please change the publisher to be Wiley?  Wiley-Blackwell was the former publisher.  But since December 2021, only  Wiley is cited as the publisher on hard copies of the journal. Wiley (not Wiley-Blackwell) has been the publisher of record on the website for many years. You can confirm this here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15737861?tabActivePane=undefined   Many thanks!
Wiley-Blackwell was the former publisher.  But since December 2021, only  Wiley is cited as the publisher on hard copies of the journal. Wiley (not Wiley-Blackwell) has been the publisher of record on the website for many years. You can confirm this here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15737861?tabActivePane=undefined   Many thanks!
KAC57 (talk) 00:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not completely convinced that this is correct because W-B is still listed as an active imprint of Wiley, which routinely is used for journals that are published in collaboration with a society. However, the cover of the journal does say "Wiley". --Randykitty (talk) 09:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 21 April 2022
Talk:Cromer Campus

message: |principal      = Mr David Pickering
220.239.99.42 (talk) 04:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.   — Jess· Δ♥ 06:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 1 April 2012 
Talk:Cumberland High School (Carlingford)

message: This page has nearly no references, with lots of information that seems like original research (a lot of it seems like information that people within the school would have typed in). Not sure if most of the information should be removed, or if anyone should be bothered to find references for the page.
DanTheGamer2003 (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are almost no references to anything on the page. 

message: I have again removed the section titled "controversy" as WP:UNDUE. It was a single event that occurred over 10 years ago with no lasting implications. In addition, it attributes motives to the individuals involved and, notably, it states the brawl wasn't even initiated by students of the school. How is this notable enough for inclusion, let alone a separate (and discouraged) section?  as you restored the section.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section removed
Talk:Technological Forecasting and Social Change

message: Anybody want to school a non-expert on correcting ISO 4 abbreviations?
My manual search of the LTWA yields "Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang." but that fails Wikipedia's test and I get the "(abbreviation) doesn't exist" warning.
Genamics JournalSeek, the NLM Catalog, and the  Journal Abbreviation Database all say it should be "Technol Forecast Soc Change". Adding periods to abbreviated words yields "Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change", but that fails. 
I also tried other variations on the periods, without luck.
So what am I doing wrong?
Pzriddle (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trying to correct the ISO abbreviation
Talk:Vallco Shopping Mall

message: It's worth mentioning Dynasty in here since it's the reason why at least more than half the people come here, and yes, that includes the movie goers too.
- Jon914 09:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynasty Restaurant 

message: "On December 1, 2018, Dynasty Seafood Restaurant closed for the last time."
This sentence inevitably raises the question how many times they closed before that last time. --217.239.12.20 (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: They would close daily so of course they had already closed many times.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

text: This was the last interior tenant. Anyone who looks at a map (like Google Maps) now will see that all remaining tenants have interior entrances.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed for the last time 

message: This topic has been slowly simmering as a very slow edit war over the past year or two. Contrary to what a naive look might suggest, there are still tenants as clearly mentioned in the article and they are in the eastern portion of the mall. The mall is very much still in existence albeit in much-diminished form.—Jasper Deng (talk) 00:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is vs was
Talk:List of one-day cricket records for New Zealand

message: Do not delete this article
I have just started it. 30 minutes ago!
I will do the headings first and then add the information.
The article does not meet the criteria for "speedy deletion".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romiben (talk • contribs) 09:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled