lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orahov Do

message: There's a page at http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/MATHPHYS/veselic/rudjer/ that has an image http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/MATHPHYS/veselic/rudjer/kuca.jpg obviously scanned from a book written in Serbian (or Croatian, can't tell) that has a caption that says "Prema predaji u Orahovu Dolu rodna kuća Nikole Boškovića, Ruđina oca", which means "According to legend in Orahov Do is the birth house of Nikola Bošković, Ruđo's father" (emphasis mine).
The old talk page about Rudjer Boscovich at Talk:Rudjer Josip Boscovich has the whole story about why we talk about Nikola Bošković... --Joy [shallot] 15:07, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: About Nikola Boskovic

message: There has also been some ambiguity as to whether the Šešelj family is originally Serb or Croat, because modern-day Šešeljs exist in branches that are both one and the other. This is particularly amusing given that Vojislav Seselj is a die-hard Serbian nationalist. Vuk Drašković, another such person, once publically accused VS of being a Croat, after which VS took offence and immediately took the press to Popovo Polje to show them the Serb Orthodox church he was christened in, and his christendom certificate. Either way, this way lies madness... --Joy [shallot] 15:50, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Vojislav Seselj 

message: 1. The monasteries are not Byzantine but Serbian. They were built and payed for by the Serbian Orthodox kings. Those are Serbian Orthodox monasteries.
2. Rascia is the Latin name for Raska, medieval name of one of the Serbian lands. By the XVI c. that state was no more, so to translate Latin "Rascia" with anything but "Serbia" is a historic anachronism ("Serbia" being a geographical area, not a state).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.20.104.30 (talk) 06:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Hiding' the fact that Rascia is Serbia
Talk:Kalmar

message: What is a 'marchancy'?  --darklilac 22:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

message: It has 34,000 habitants as of which year?            Ciacchi 21:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 2003. See :sv:Kalmar stad / Fred-Chess 23:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habitants 

message: Pretty sure he isn't an "Aregntinian patron".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.238.154 (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barack Obama?  
Talk:Johan Helmich Roman

message: The article :sv:Johan Helmich Roman on the Swedish Wikipedia has a lot of information useful for expanding this article. EldKatt 15:58, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish article 

message: The Shorter Drottningholm Music is the same as the Suite in D major. This part of the text should therefore be changed. And the mentioning of conductor Claude M Génetay should be restored, I believe. He was, after all, an influential musician and very much responsible for the revival of Roman's music in the late 20th century, with his large number of revisions and concert performances of said music. Besides, he did create the expression "the Shorter Drottningholm Music". This should be mentioned in the article (as it was before), since it is a modern title not coined by Roman himself or any musicians of that age. /Respectfully, as always: --Hallonboat 02:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This part should be changed: 

message: The portrait previously in the article is very likely NOT Roman, as explained on the Commons description page. Therefore I removed it. There are probably no portraits of Roman, so the article should not be equipped with one. /NH (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Explicitly parallel instruction computing

message: I rewrote this article with much more technical content. The previous version was very vague, mentioning making programs parallel. Dyl 16:15, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
I think the end might need some updating. HP (as well as some other firms) have pledged to put substantial money into the Itanium over the next few years (the announcement is very recent though). -- Josh. March 31, 2006
: "EPIC" is either synonymous with "Itanium Architecture", or it is not. If it is, then this article should be merged into the Itanium article. If not, then Itanium-specific information does not belong here. -Arch dude (talk) 03:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section
Talk:Progressive Party (United States)

message: Should we divide this into United States Progressive Party (1912), United States Progressive Party (1924), and United States Progressive Party (1948)? john k 16:42, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing militating against such a change is that each of the Progressive Parties was pretty ephemeral, so it's not clear that each deserves its own entry. - Nat Krause 18:07, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: yes they should be split because there was no continuity between them and each represented very important forces specific to its own time period. 67.176.74.236 19:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I will split the article into 4 parts, a disambiguation page and three main articles. With some cross references added it should not confuse any users (and it will eliminate the confusion that tends to run the movements together). Rjensen 06:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text: good point-- I fixed it so that it's only a disambig page. (but doesn't that require a little more?) Rjensen
I replaced section titles with bullet points. Much closer to the classic Wikipedia disambiguation page.--AladdinSE 08:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

text:  Nice job! Rjensen 08:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division? 

message: Hello. Can an expert go through the links to this page and fix them so they point directly to whichever incarnation of this party is appropriate? There are some tools available to help with this kind of work (see Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser or Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups). Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 12:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to this page 

message: This article is incomplete.  There is absolutely no mention of the Progressive Party in California lasting from 1900-1910.  The progressive party at its peak with Gov. Hiram Johnson was a major factor in cutting the strangle hold of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company on California politics and instituting several progressive changes which are still in affect today.  These include the State Propositions, term limits, non party local elected officials, and the primary system to name a few.  Not mentioning the progressive party in California does severe injustice to an article about the progressive party.  In fact, it is clear that there was a progressive movement in California because Governor and later Senator Hiram Johnson was the vice presidential candidate under Theodore Roosevelts Progressive party platform in the 1912 presidential election.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.8.183 (talk) 01:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Progressive Party of California
Talk:Robert Harley, 1st Earl of Oxford and Earl Mortimer

message: Commentary on the source:  the 1911 Encyclopedia Britanica is a laudable thing and a reputable source.  However, when it comes to 18th century subjects, it is very partisan.  In particular, it treats Whig figures very differently from Tory ones, and Harley is one of the princes of the Tory cause.  In particular, the 1911 editors still had the shadow of Thomas Babbington Macaulay over them, and Macaulay's "Whig History."  Thus, Tory figures were all distempered or foolish, and Whig figures were always wise and honorable.  Keep that in mind when reading this biography.  The Dictionary of National Biography is far less biased but far wordier in its treatment of Oxford.  (Also note that nothing of Harley's book collecting is mentioned -- something I will correct in a moment.  The man's book collecting single handedly saved the fields of Anglo-Saxon, Renaissance, and Middle English literature.  This is the "Harley" of "The Harleian Collection" in the British Museum.) Geogre 16:45, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know why the title is not simply Oxford, but why Mortimer?  —Tamfang 19:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortimer 
Talk:ISRO

message: According to ISRO's website "ISRO was previously the Indian National Committee for Space Research (INCOSPAR), set up by the Government of India in 1962, as envisioned by Dr. Vikram A Sarabhai". Please remove reference to INCOSPAR being estabilshed under Jawaharlal Nehru as it may have been during the time of Pt. Nehru but was the vision of Dr. Sarabhai. This institution of national importance and the real people, the pioneering scientists, behind it must be recognised. Tyhwyel (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My request is to change - "ISRO was previously the Indian National Committee for Space Research(INCOSPAR), set up under Jawaharlal Nehru in 1962 recognising the need for space research." to "ISRO was previously the Indian National Committee for Space Research(INCOSPAR), set up by the Government of India in 1962 recognising the need for space research, as envisioned by Dr. Vikram A Sarabhai." Tyhwyel (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2023 (2) 

message: I have removed some duplicate sources (per WP:CITEKILL) in one of my edits. I forgot to mention it in my edit summary so now I'm leaving the notice here. If anyone has any kind of query related to it, disscus it right here! Thank you. — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 07:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted your edit as you removed the content from the lead. Per WP:LEAD, the lead should summarize the whole body. TheWikiholic (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted your edits back per MOS:LEADLENGTH, the previous version of lead was not a summary, they were literally reflecting the history section (word by word). Also avoid assumptions while summarising your edits. Happy editing. — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 03:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Also WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:NOTREPOSITORY. — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 03:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Whenever you get some time, read all three of them thoroughly (all of them are extremely important). Have a good time! — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 03:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

text: This article's lead is literally a copy of its history section, and that's why I removed it (per MOS:LEADLENGTH) but you reverted my edist stating "No, can't remove this." Would you like to explain 'why  this cannot be removed?' — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 11:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I'd only ask you to stay civil and avoid false assumptions. — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 05:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead should continue to have the essential details. The summary of its history is important for being mentioned on the lead because it is impossible to imagine the existence of this organization without occurrence of those mentioned events. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 12:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it. Thanks for letting me know. — 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 💬 12:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About citations removal (August 2023)
Talk:Gazette van Detroit

message: Does the Gazette van Detroit not have its own website? All I can see in google are sites mentioning it. Odd. Nadavspi 17:27, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Office of Management and Budget

message: Hi, My name is John Harris and I'm on Facebook the 4th Horseman and bill gates had Given former president Barack Obama $250,000.00 I was am Supposed to Receive and I live in North Little Rock Arkansas and I have a back account at Simmons bank and I was trying to figure out what is going on with that. My address is 8605 green acre rd, north little rock ar 72118. Simmons 1st John B. Harris 12/16/85. I receive a low income check each month and it's not enough 914.00 and I need driver's license I got GOD GOING ON and I'm about to wind up CAUSES the REVEALING...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100B:B136:AFDE:0:19:A525:2E01 (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

message: Peter Orszag could not have been "appointed" on 15th December 2008 both because President Obama was not president than, and wasn't yet confirmed by the senate. He technically couldn't have even been nominated at that date, as nomination is an official term which would require presidential action. The line should read that the President-elected announced he would nominate Peter Orszag on 15th December 2008, or that he was selected on that date for nomination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.112.247 (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it. Director Bolten's Congressional testimony of March 24, 2004. - Walkiped 18:04, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first external link is either mislabeled or misdirected, because it says it goes to the organization's website, which to me would mean OMB's website, but instead it goes to the website of the White House.
Here's a copy of the wording of the link:
" External links
    Office of Management and Budget - organization's web site"
It goes to the website of the White House.
Entwhiz (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The OMB is part of the Executive Office of the President of the United States (basically, the White House), hence, its website is a sub-site under the White House's site. --Cybercobra (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  the first external link 

message: Trump Tweeted "I want to thank Acting Chief Mick Mulvaney for having served the Administration so well. He will become the United States Special Envoy for Northern Ireland. Thank you!" on March 6, 2020, 8:08pm est. Unclear if this means he left the OMB. He replaced Mulvaney with Mark Meadows as Chief of Staff. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1236096307858681857  — Preceding unsigned comment added by P37307 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Acting director/Mulvaney  status
Talk:Battle of Pollilur (1780)

message: Moved here from the main article: 
"In this forgotten village we have two large monuments commumerating the war named after the two captains who lost there life  here...i have reached and have taken the snaps of this town .....its a long dusty road from palur village u have one in two hour bus which takes you to this perticular town .....Dr Jahanzeb .........dr_jahanzeb@hotmail.com"
--Dyss 18:42, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Evidence: (Introduction passage) "  It was waged between two forces commanded by Tipu Sultan of the Kingdom of Mysore, and Colonel William Baille of the British East India Company. Baille was given only 1,000 reinforcements from General Munro. "
The final sentence is intentionally biased. It forces the reader to sympathize with the British and assume the fault of the defeat of Colonel William Baille was the lack of reinforcements rather than the fighting prowess of Tipu Sultan of Mysore. That such a sentence is placed in the introductory passage is itself suspect. A false sense of righteousness of the British in the 18th and 19th century has affected many authors who are sources for the article. But since 'Wikipedia' serves all the people of the world and not just British, it needs to place facts in an unbiased manner and not use the internet medium to proselytize nationalism. I would be grateful if you remove the justification part of the article. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajjanajjas (talk • contribs) 07:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is another evidence of this website NOT being neutral in displaying facts 
Talk:American-British-Dutch-Australian Command

message: I have removed this request for more information, as user:Indy beetle who made the request did not explain here on the talk page what information (s)he) considers desirable to add. -- PBS (talk) 11:20, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for more information (2016)
Talk:Duchy of Athens

message: Can we get a coat of arms in the article for the Duchy?  --Daniel C. Boyer 18:57, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I've ever seen one, although I'm sure they had some sort of heraldry. Do you know where one might be found? Adam Bishop 05:06, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Athens was originally a vassal state of the Kingdom of Thessalonica, but after Thessalonica was captured in 1224 by Theodore, the Byzantine Despot of Epirus...
However, according to the Thessaloniki article, it was conquered by Michael Ducas (which makes sense, as Theodore had already died by that time). Is it agreed that this should be changed? -- Itai 10:13, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would beg to argue that this tower, which may or may not have been of Frankish origin (Possibly Ottoman?) was dismantled in 1874!  This date, from whatever sources the author used, is most incorrect!  The tower even existed when Athens again? hosted the Olympic Games!  I am sure that the author of this site might well be able to find out the same information as did I?  But, perhaps I will post my sources in a later post!69.92.23.64 (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo of the so called Frankish Tower, reportedly dismantled in 1874! 

message: 96.19.152.171 (talk) 03:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name two famous rivers that ran along side Ancient Athens? 

message: What is the whole point of this section? It doesn't contain anything that warrants it being its own section. It's already been flagged for needing citation, which I would assume also comes only from it being a "coincidental" piece of information (at least based on what it has now).
If this were to have its own portion, this warrants it having a "In literature" or "In popular media" section instead, and expanded beyond those two. If none otherwise, I believe it should be ommited. RayaOstrinsula (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article titled "The Duchy, Dante Alighieri, and William Shakespeare"
Talk:Anne de Mortimer

message: Suggested entry for another, contemporary 'Anne Mortimer'. How does one add an entry as an 'alternative' to a primary entry?
Anne Mortimer (b 1960) Artist and book illustrator, well known for her super-realist cat illustrations and botanical work. Anne Mortimer ranks among Britain's most talented illustrators and is widely recognized as one of the finest contemporary painters of cats anywhere in the world. Anne is also an accomplished painter of birds, botanicals and miniatures and has won awards from the Society of Botanical Artists and the Royal Miniature Society.
<spamlinks redacted>
::I've asked about this at Wikipedia Help. NinaGreen (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently nobody has yet deemed the artist worth the effort of creating an article about. If you know enough and have reliable sources (i.e., nothing from her own website, just solid neutral reports), then create one and title it Anne Mortimer (artist); then put hatnotes on both articles to distinguish them from each other. We don't do disambiguation pages if there are only two notable persons of that name. However: leave out all the peacock words: promotional crap garbage like "...well known for...", "...ranks among Britain's most talented illustrators...", "...widely recognized as one of the finest contemporary painters of cats anywhere in the world. Anne is also an accomplished painter..." will get you tossed out on your ear as a spammer of some kind. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:40, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the tips.  I'll leave it up to someone who knows more about the artist. NinaGreen (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Jeanne boleyn, thanks for adding the citation for the place of Anne Mortimer's birth.  I've added it to the References section of the article. NinaGreen (talk) 15:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I have long been fascinated by the Mortimer family and indeed, I have created articles on various family members and those connected by marriage.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for place of Anne Mortimer's birth 

message: The article states that she was "Born on 27 December 1388". However, Genealogics gives 1390. Her mother's article says that her parents' marriage took place "on or about 7 October 1388.. Although it is of course possible for a child to be born less than three months after her parents' wedding, I suggest that premarital cohabitation would be unlikely between two fourteenth-century aristocratic teenagers. Her maternal grandparents would have had too much to lose if the wedding had failed to take place for any reason. Comments? Alekksandr (talk) 18:58, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Miraj Khalid

message: I thought it was copied also at first, but quoting from the main page : Data from this site may be queried and copied on a not-for-profit basis only if the source is accurately credited., so it really just needs a link to the source of the information. --Khalid 19:25, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
:I'm not sure of the policy on non-commercial content, but you'd better mention it at WP:CP. Ðåñηÿßôý | Talk 19:44, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lucky Boys Confusion

message: Err, regarding this comment: 'LBC is one of a select group of rock bands with a non-caucasian band member, let alone a non-caucasian lead singer.' - surely this is only exceptional in very specific cultures? There are quite a lot of non-caucasian people in the world. 80.202.99.72 11:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this it??? Deb 19:35, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Lucky boys confusion]]
Talk:Unalienable rights

message: This article needs to be better Wikified, but adequate examples are given of "inalienable" being used in a context different than the stated meaning of "unalienable."  Additionally, very little of this information is given in the "inalienable" article.  Articles should never be combined unless their information is combined.  Please obey the rules of conduct and dispute resolution.  List the reasons why you would like to combine these articles and how you propose combining them before doing so.  --206.176.221.196 16:29, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article being reverted to nothing? 

message: I will be logging a Request for Comment if this article is erased again before the dispute is resolved.  The article lists multiple verifiable examples of how this word is used differently than the word being combined with this one.  A response that addresses this discrepency is required before merging can be considered.  --206.176.221.196 16:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requests for Comment 

message: Carbonite | Talk 15:20, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD Result
Talk:List of names of the European Union in the official languages

message: It's interesting... Are Bulgarian and Romanian already official languages of the EU? (The countries will join the EU only in 2007). Alensha 20:12, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They aren't. Thanks for pointing out the mistake. — Trilobite (Talk) 21:37, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: The Greek name is transliterated in Ancient Greek style as Eurōpaïké Énōsē, but wouldn't Modern Greek pronunciation be Evropekí Énosi?--JWB 12:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek
Talk:Daffodil

message: I added a taxobox, but unfortunately I know nothing about daffodils.  Can anyone fill in the "species" part? --zenohockey 21:16, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Help Needed

message: I am seriously proposing that the article Daffodil should be merged into Narcissus (genus). The name "daffodil" is the English word of the Latin "narcissus". Other plant articles in Wikipedia are under their Latin names, with the English version being redirected to it. Dieter Simon 23:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger into "Narcissus (genus)" article