Talk:Brandon Wilson (writer)

message: * this article is borderline vanity article without proper references for verifiability. If these could be added in a references or external links section that would make this piece more encyclopedic, esp. if the creator of this article (and most of the edits) would sign up to Wikipedia and actually log in.
* Also may have to double check qualification under WP:BIO, although probably this individual qualifies.
Santaduck 00:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: * Article appears to be by author, or an acquaintance, as all edits of the related (presumably dynamic) IPs are only on three articles: the author, and an article each for two of his publications-- otherwise the editor is not a wikipedian.
* therefore also violates the no original research rule of Wikipedia
*consider for afd as vanity article/self-promotionSantaduck 09:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the reviews again. A quote is fine, but adding the entire review is a copyright violation. As the publisher of the books of the authors, it is difficult for you to be neutral, and your additions look to me more like advertising than an encyclopedia. Please restrain yourself more, the article may still be listed for deletion. -- Chris 73 | Talk 08:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brandon Wilson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210205526/http://news.asiaeast.org/aeinterview2008.php to http://news.asiaeast.org/aeinterview2008.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 13:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 October 2021 

message: @BuySomeApples one question re this edit. I'd added the line in works because the citations in the subheaders were breaking the TOC. Is there another way you suggest to cover it, or you don't think his list of publications needs sourcing? Not disagreeing with your edit, just clarifying the why on mine. Star Mississippi 22:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  I was cutting down the bibliography and awards list to only include the stuff sourced in the body, but I'll put that line back in. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotcha and thanks @BuySomeApples. Open to other solutions too which would help with the redundancy that seems to be an issue with authors' articles. Star Mississippi 22:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick Question 

message: Anyone good with image layout? I tried to fix the second map but instead of being bisected by the "Works" section header, there's now the white space. Is there a better way to solve, or live with the bisection? Star Mississippi 14:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to move the images around a bit, and they look good on my end. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, much better layout. Thanks @BuySomeApples Star Mississippi 02:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps