Talk:Code folding

message: Hello,
The section about conventions, talks about token-based and user-specified. But the fact is that token-based is the implementation of user-specified folding, so perhaps the page should just talks about user-specified, giving a note telling that user-specified use tokens inside the source.
In my own way of understanding things, there are two types of folding editors :
* Passive folding (the editor generate folding automaticaly while parsing the code)
* Active folding (the user decide what folding will be)
An editor may permit both (as do Leo, for which one I've just added a link in the bottom of the page)
What do you think about the remark concerning token-based vs user-specified ?
Regards,
Hibou57 | 22:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While in a sense you're right, I still think they should be considered distinct from each other.  Although I could understand changing the list so user-specified has two subsections: token-based and and anonymous, or something like that.  -- Heptite (T) (C) (@) 06:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Token-based vs User-specified 

message: The page states that user specified folding is a feature of eclipse. I haven't found it though. For java code, the only folding I have found is syntax based. No user specified, token based or intdention based folding as far as I have seen. 
Is the text on this wiki page really accurate? Are there any references that can verify this, if not, I think it should be removed? 89.253.76.62 (talk) 22:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since noone has given any reference to other types of code folding in eclipse than syntax based, and I have searched and not found any code folding other than syntax based, I have changed the text on the page 89.253.76.62 (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  User specified folding in Eclipse 

message: In the table it lists XCode as having token-based folding as a feature, but as far as I'm aware that's not the case. What is the delimiter for this? --mikechen (talk) 03:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  XCode token-based folding 

message: It seems appropriate to me that there be mentions of the following facts:
   * Some word processors support (text) folding (but, because code is text, they also support code folding.  Microsoft Word calls it (or, at least, used to call it) "collapsible outlining", which, I believe should be in the text so that it can be found during a search.
   * Libre / Free <something> Office supports the essentials of collapsible outlining by providing a feature that displays only the headings of a document at various levels. 
Rhkramer (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folding in Word Processors 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Code folding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061223230643/http://www.outliners.com/ to http://www.outliners.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified