lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leonid Brezhnev

message: This Rfc comes to resolve an ongoing dispute over whether citations should be included in the lede to support the claim that "numerous observers argued the Soviet Union had surpassed the United States to become the world's strongest military power." Should citations be included in the lede to support this claim? Emiya1980 (talk) 21:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I almost interjected in the above section with exactly the same thing.  They are allowed, but not preferred.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 03:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Suggestion the word "numerous" can be misleading. A solution can be "some observers".  O.maximov (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Nemov Yes. Emiya1980 (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rfc on Citations regarding Soviet Military strength. 

message: To save valuable editor time this RFC should be closed or withdrawn. I'd close it as WP:SNOW and a clear case of MOS:LEADCITE, but since I voted I won't close it. , are you willing to withdraw? Thanks! Nemov (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nemov Yes. Emiya1980 (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Notwithstanding the ongoing discussion above, the current lead is missing key information on Brezhnev's career and leadership. I propose that elements of this revision be added (Special:Permalink/1224486535): it adds detail on his various positions after the war, when he was rising up the ranks in the party, and as the body describes, highlights that he was sponsored by Khrushchev from even before the war and was a long-time loyalist before ousting him. Mentions of SALT I, the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia, and the Brezhnev Doctrine are also crucial. — Goszei (talk)  18:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: His political and militarily career was very broad, thus it would not make sense to point out these  particular military endeavours on lead. Capitals00 (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Compared to what is already featured in the lede, I think Brezhnev's relationship with Khrushchev is a piece of relatively trivial information which is best left for the article's body to expound on. With regards to the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia and the ensuing Brezhnev Doctrine, the lede already mentions that Brezhnev strengthened the Soviet Union's dominion over Eastern Europe and pursued a policy of widespread military interventionism abroad. With that being said, I have no problem with you squeezing in mention of SALT I as a part of detente as long as it doesn't come at the expense of content which is already present.Emiya1980 (talk) 01:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead is missing key info
Talk:Chronicle of a Death Foretold

message: The article states that the narrator it's anonymous, but it's a self-insertion of Gabriel García Marquez himself, you can confirm it by looking at the names of the family of the narrator in the novel: the name of the mother matches with the name of Gabriel García Marquez's mother, same for the wife, the name of the aunt of the narrator is Wenefrida Márquez(that means that one of the 2 surnames of the narrator is Marquez), there is also the mentioning of a brother named Jaime(Garcia Marquez also has a brother named Jaime in real life).
I kind of remember that in one part of the novel somebody calls the narrator "Gabriel", but I'm not completely sure.
--2620:0:1000:8010:C362:EA95:728E:8F0D (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous narrator? 

message: The PostmodernMystery.com Ted Gioia Link Doesn't Work 76.81.148.80 (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The PostmodernMystery.com Ted Gioia Link Doesn't Work
Talk:Canadian Pacific Railway

message: Further examination of the article allows me to make the determination that the article was written with an encyclopedic viewpoint in mind. There is little to no evidence of bias or problematic content in the article. Instead, the article is told as if one was reading from an encyclopedia in a library. Interestingly, one portion of the article covers the use of Chinese workers in the building of the railway's main lines and branches, which is a potentially troublesome topic for some. However, those who wrote out this article have clearly refined the article to the point that there is no evidence of racism or bias to one side of the conflict. It would be very easy for an individual to navigate to this particular page and input some choice comments about the labour that the Chinese immigrant workers in British Columbia partook in. However, there is no evidence of untoward content whether that is defined as racism or as bias. Some may argue that the article reads a little bit too much into the government and corporate sector of the company - there are plenty of references to the government proceedings and corporate dealings that led to the creation of the railway. However, the argument can be made that it is extremely important to ensure that all of the relevant dealings that took place in the lead up to the creation of the idea of a Pacific railway system that linked the Western half of Canada with the Eastern portions of the country. James.Gough.93 (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation 

message: I propose that the History section be split into a separate page called History of the Canadian Pacific Railway. The article has exceeded 150kb, and this section is large and well-sourced enough to make its own page. RetroCosmos (talk) 02:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - The section is huge and would work well being split. Lewcm Talk to me! 16:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Support - I do think it's a good idea to have a separate article dedicated solely to the history. Riad Salih (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal 

message: Please see this discussion concerning both this article and the Canadian Pacific Kansas City one. CPKCer (talk) 22:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Canadian_Pacific_Kansas_City#Company_status]]
Talk:Imja Tse

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—122.56.168.229 (talk) 01:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 12:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Honda Jazz

message: Honda Jazz → Honda Fit … Rationale: Both names are just about equally recognized in the Anglophone world. However, "Fit" is the name used in its home country, Japan, where it is immensely popular. "Fit" is also more specific; "Honda Jazz" can refer to three unrelated vehicles which this article barely mentions. This article should be moved and "Jazz" should be a disambig page. AKADriver 18:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved, since there was no opposition. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 13:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I reorganized the article since it seemed like it was being updated every now and then without any regards to structure or content.  I added lots of information on the car and completely restructured the article.  I also got rid of some errors about the engine (no such thing as a 1.1L Fit or Jazz).  Also note that the 1.3L sold in Japan and the 1.4L sold in Europe are the same engine (1339cc L13A i-DSI).  I think I made it fairly clear in the article, but please add/modify if it is not clear enough.
I tried to keep several parts of the original article that I thought were good, and of course the pictures I kept, but I added the automobile box.  I hope I didn't step on anyone's toes, but I thought the article could use the overhaul.
--Hungarian83 08:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite of article 2006.01.30. 

message: Isn't it called the jazz, instead of the Jazz? When I was in Europe, I saw many Honda jazzes, with the "j" on the badge on the back being lower case... The RSJ 16:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of the font style on the badge, it is referred to as "Honda Jazz" anywhere where the font is "case sensitive" - see e.g. . Regards, Bravada, talk - 17:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honda jazz? 

message: Does the windshield of a jazz fit on a "fit" ??
Stef
--World arm lamp 11:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences fit and jazz
Talk:Sublanguage

message: From googling I've seen this term used in a semi-illiterate fashion on computer science courses, but in terms of computer language theory it seems to be utter gibberish. The example given, SQL, is a complete language in and of itself.  Nothing provided by a RDBMS alters that. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 06:35, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rubbish

message: I've rewritten the thing from scratch with reference to Codd's usage. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:22, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Tony! I was despairing of ever getting a solid article out of this mess. — Jeff Q (talk) 11:55, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Efficient market theory

message: Maybe this page should be merged into Efficient markets theory. mydogategodshat 09:52, 9 May 2004 (UTC)

message: Efficient Markets Hypothesis is the most common name.  This article seems to be asserting that there is an overarching theory.  The only more general theory along this line that I know of is Rational expectations, so in short this article is not needed.
Smallbones 18:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into "Efficient Markets Hypothesis"
Talk:Marty Feldman

message: According to several sources, he died of shellfish poisoning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4701:C4A0:9127:D9F8:A350:C296 (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Dying of shellfish poisoning is quite rare. Dying of smoking is commonplace. Activist (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

text: See previous discussion on "Cause of death" above. Certainly smoking seem to have been a contributory factor. I'd suggest that this source, currently given only in "Further reading", be added as a source in the "Death" section. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death
Talk:Court of St James's

message: This page is supposed to be named Court of St James's, since it is the court of St James's Palace —Mulad 15:32, May 9, 2004 (UTC)
----
I've moved the article from Court of St James's to Court of St. James's, in line with other articles.
James F. (talk) 23:31, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Hi, in the text I read "In 2009 there were 172 foreign missions ... This total was made up of 46 high commissions ... and 128 embassies ...". 46+128=174, which is not equal to the 172. Could someone please enlighten this? Thank you. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of foreign missions 

message: I think that some statements in the article are nonsense. A static name was not needed for a Court often on the move, nor was it chosen because of the Master of Ceremonies. It was ,and remains, the senior royal residence, and hence the name of the court. Also, high commissioners are not accredited at Court, but are exchanged by governments. It would be impossible,say, for the Canadian high commissioner to be accredited at the Court as that would mean he represents the Canadian Queen at her own Court.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.142.193.134 (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming the court
Talk:Sentence

message: User:2409:4062:2e8f:c9b1::1e4b:ab10 is repeatedly vandalizing this page by trying to turn it into a regular article.   Two problems with this:
# You seem to have no knowledge of Wikipedia markup language - which is a serious matter.  You're putting bizarre heading into the article when you should be using things like "== This is a heading ==".
# You don't understand that this page is **NOT** an article about the linguistic concept of a "sentence" - it is a "disambiguation" page - which is the way that Wikipedia directs people to the various different meanings of the word "Sentence" (for example - a prison sentence).   By trying to turn this into an article about linguistics, you are quite literally vandalizing Wikipedia.
Please don't do that.
SteveBaker (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a disambiguation page
Talk:Slovakia

message: The country infobox serves to briefly provide basic information. The same is true for the part involving history. 
However, this is not currently the case in this article. This section does not show the basic historical events crucial to statehood, but the whole historical discourse. 
This is not right and no other country's Infobox has it. Note that there are 10 historical events with lots of parentheses and notes. Compared to Germany, which has a much longer statehood, for which 5 events are enough. Simply compared to any other country - this Infobox in wiki article about a country is crazy and unprecedented. Not to mention that there is a historical event about the state (Slovak state during WW2), to which the current Slovakia does not reference  politically or legally, and therefore it is not an event in its statehood. Therefore, I perform standardization with really basic and key events, not the whole discourse.--Igec133 (talk) 07:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Opposite. If, it is very big problem for You, the section can be collapsed. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 08:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Opposite. Every country has different kind of history, you cant remove important facts in infobox about Slovak history to only few basic points, just because you dont like how many information it has. The infobox is without change for many months and it looks like you are the only one editor who has problem with that. You constantly removing map - Slovakia on the globe, informations about Slovak history and also even anthem from infobox (thats pure vandalism). Please stop with your disturbing edits. Peter11700 (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

text: I would also support removing the First Slovak Republic from the establishment history section. Croatia and Ukraine's articles don't include their respective Axis collaborationist governments in the establishment history section, so I don't see a reason to include a similar government in this page's infobox's establishment history section. CJ-Moki (talk) 02:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Opposite. The First Slovak Republic didn't come to being as a result of a 'simple' ruling party change. It was the first Slovak country. Gyalu22 (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History in Infobox 

message: Slovakia culturally Eastern Europe Milenka26 (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovakia
Talk:I Am – Somebody

message: Per WP:LYRICS, the extensive quoting of copyrighted poetry and song lyrics is considered a copyright violation and must be removed, so I have done so. The use of a few lines is acceptable but I'll leave others to decide which lines to use. If Jackson has released his poem to the public domain, then this needs to be clearly indicated in the article with a verifiable source. I doubt the lyrics quoted from the J.B.'s version is public domain, however. 23skidoo 00:37, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio removed

message: Yasmin Brown featured in this episode
Who is Yasmin Brown? Anything relation of Yasmin Alibhi-Brown, or someone else altogether? Flapdragon (talk) 06:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yasmin Brown?
Talk:Mount Jackson (Antarctica)

message: The opening line possibly needs rewording IMO as the word massive, in it's context, doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Robvanvee 05:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening line

message: The information at  is consistent with two of my satellite sources. If it is correct then Mount Jackson is not the highest point of the Antarctic Peninsula or even an ultra prominent peak. Mount Hope, its replacement, appears to be at S 69:47:52 W 64:27:18. Viewfinder (talk) 05:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the press release from British Antarctic Survey. - 4ing (talk) 08:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Hope
Talk:Constitution of 3 May 1791

message: I may add a few more references from Gierowski's parts that I haven't covered yet. I will use some of the material and references from this article in the history 1764-1795 article, when I get to that point. Orczar (talk) 13:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gierowski references 

message: The constitution text clearly states: "Everything, everywhere, shall be decided by majority vote;" and this is confirmed by Wagner (p.389): "For the validity of resolutions, which comprised measures having nopermanent character (including budgetary questions, diplomatic measures,decision on war and peace and temporary taxes), a majority of the votes of allmembers of the Sejm were necessary." Unfortunately, I no longer have access to Jedruch, but nothing in the constitution text supports the two-thirds/three-quarters reading, now removed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two thirds / three fourths majorities? 
Talk:Chantal Mouffe

message: Hehehe, how else do you think? "moof". QuartierLatin1968
Link to Westminster  does not work I think it is: http://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/directory/mouffe,-chantal (if you suppose to link to that page ??)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.132.106.107 (talk) 18:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is Mouffe pronounced?
Talk:Mount Kerinci

message: Seems like this page should be merged with "Mount Kerinci", which (I believe) is the more correct spelling in current Indonesian usage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbarron (talk • contribs) 04:09, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm Indonesian, and the correct name is Kerinci, NOT Kerinchi. Well, more Google results do not means more correct, because many West people still use uncorrect new Indonesian writing system introduced in 1972.
----------
SNOW ?
Has snow or snow flakes ever been seen in or around the Kerinci ? It is more than 3800m and it would be the tallest place where neiother a single snowflake fallen in modern era.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.9.195.100 (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hallasan

message: dormant or extinct?
:Wait and see... -- Visviva 09:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  volcano 

message: Infobox says 1007 CE, article body says 5000 years ago. volcano.si.edu (cited in the article) cites (Lee, Moon Won 1982) which, if google translate and/or the OCR aren't lying, seems to state that "there is a record of an eruption in 1570". The article also cites the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty, which I can't find for the correct time period in a language I can read. 07jay (talk) 23:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most recent eruption 

message: This article needs a good chunk of work; may get around to it eventually 104.232.119.107 (talk) 23:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive guide-like writing
Talk:Olympia Snowe

message: I have put in a request for this article to be protected, as it seems to be a target of someone using University of Maine public computers to put vulgar words and phrases in the article. Warnings on one IP address had no effect; another was recently used, suggesting they started using another computer. 331dot (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection request entered 

message: Do we have to use that picture for her? This current one(the one at the top right of the page) looks kinda... bad. Kude90 (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That was her last official Senate photo.  I'm not the expert but I think it's much easier to use that than other photos since it is public domain(being from the government). 331dot (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture? 

message: I think there should be an expansion of the description of Snowe's involvement in health care reform, including material from Obama's forthcoming memoir. An excerpt just appeared in the New Yorker. Ishboyfay (talk) 23:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Involvement in health care reform
Talk:Sweetheart Cup Company

message: This company is being talked about briefly on the article of the dis-ambiguation page Sweetheart. Can anyone put the information in detail on this page?? 66.245.83.71 21:44, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Riva (band)

message: Riva is also the name of a Star Trek character. But neither the band nor the character seems to have a strong claim to the name "Riva" without a parenthetical disambiguation, that is to say, these should probably get the article names Riva (band) and Riva (Star Trek). The first few Google results for just "riva" are for computer graphics technology and motorsports equipment. ShutterBugTrekker 21:46, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that Riva doesn`t exist anymore because it was kind of a  mixture of Croatian, Serbian and other artists but then war happened...--Avala 09:47, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. The Riva character was a deaf and mute mediator who was very successful at resolving disputes between warring peoples. ShutterBugTrekker 20:47, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:US Congress Representatives from District of Columbia

message: Let's not rewrite law and history. DC does not have a Representative nor Senators because the Constituion of the United States says so. DC has never had such representation. Because some people would like to change that, they managed to get a non-voting delegate in the House to speak for their interests. -- Cecropia | Talk 21:50, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Why DC Reps Don't Vote
Talk:Snooker world rankings 2002/2003

message: This article needs another title.  RickK 22:04, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is that? Is the forward slash a problem? --Auximines 14:49, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's fine. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]   ‹(-¿-)› 14:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Talk:Boss (video games)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Load-bearing boss. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Load-bearing boss listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: i'm confused at exactly what this part of the article aims to establish. is it trying to document historic usage of the term "boss", noteworthy early video game bosses, or both? while the article begins by trying to trace the origin of the term, it eventually slips into just talking about random early bosses (the 'motherships' are a good example, i'm struggling to see how these particular instances are noteworthy).
i think this could do with being turned into two sections; etymology of the video game 'boss', and the history of boss mechanics. Meikkon (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; I have extracted the history about the terminology into a dedicated 'Etymology' subsection. Seabass-labrax (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's going on in the "history" section? 

message: I remember these were the terms used in British 8-bit magazines, e.g. for the ZX Spectrum. "Boss" seems to have come later. 2A00:23C5:FE56:6C01:D111:9B27:B214:204B (talk) 11:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Guardian", "end-of-level guardian"
Talk:I'll Never Forget What's'isname

message: At 1 minute in, the title that appears onscreen is I'll Never Forget What's'isname. This is not shown within the body of the article itself currently, and the titles that are within the article text differ only in capitalization, which I would consider a stylistic difference, and not an actual different title.
I propose this as the start of the first sentence to this article:
:I'll Never Forget What's'isname (also known as I'll Never Forget What's 'Isname) is...
and the additional parenthetical details about where the versions have been seen can be added in the note.
Thoughts?
WikkanWitch (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the film