Talk:The Scream (album)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on The Scream (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/siouxsieandthebanshees/albums/album/106537/review/5941624/the_scream
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :I am concerned by the addition of this [edit].. The contributor obviously doesn't own the original and did a copy/paste from this [site], exactly presenting the same way with 
:firstly "Album Review by Julie Burchill WELL, WHATEVER WOULD EDVARD MUNCH HAVE SAID? SIOUXSIE AND THE BANSHEES The Scream (Polydor)". This is blatant. The contributor doesn't have the original, he can not advance the veracity of this article and if this sentence was published in the paper. This is why it is wiser to withdraw it the mistakes are very common on this fansite and we are not entirely sure if it is a review by Julie and not an article published in another paper. Carliertwo (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a link to a scan of NME Originals: Goth. The Burchill review is on page 13 of the scan (originally page 45 of the relevant issue of the NME). PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

text: Carliertwo (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Julie Burchill

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on The Scream (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100105010206/http://rocksbackpages.com/article.html?ArticleID=12125 to http://rocksbackpages.com/article.html?ArticleID=12125
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713030438/http://www.inflightdata.com/superpredators.html to http://www.inflightdata.com/superpredators.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01cyrh9
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bozboorer.com/qa_p4.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: These sentences -->  are a presentation of what follows in this section, and the content of the reviews. These sentences have been included for more than six years. Dozens of longtime wikipedia users including  who is a professional music journalist, has ever tagged theses sentences as wp:puffery as they reflect what's inside the reviews.  
Can  and  (who reviewed another Satb album article) give their views about these sentences that someone tagged with wp:puffery and WP:IMPARTIAL ? Carliertwo (talk) 00:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps adding some references would be helpful -- that sounds like a solution that would leave everyone happy. If we do not have any references that state these things, perhaps there may be legitimate "synthesis" worries. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2020