lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Te Rata Bridge

message: My knowledge of Te Rata farm and the Hayes Bridge arose from the fact that I was the sole teacher at the tiny Whakahoro School just 3 miles downstream from Te Rata, where I boarded with the Hayes family in 1947.
Stanwrite 23:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Stanwrite, neither of those external links works. We will need to remove menton of them from the article, or correct the addresses. Moriori 00:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Knowledge
Talk:Tomb of Horrors

message: This article proclaims that "Wizards of the Coast released an updated version of the original module as a free download for Halloween 2005." I have been unable to find this version. Can anybody provide a link? — Itai (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, found it (). Added a link to the the article, as well. — Itai (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free download 

message: . - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't read it, but you download an updated version of it here. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thank you. --Kizor 21:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future ref 

message: Not sure what it really is.  I think it's a total remake.  There was a revert just now that said Wizard sent out free copies of ToH.  Not sure if it's this one or the old one. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If I was wrong, I apologize for reverting! 204.153.84.10 (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You were right about it being unsourced, and after a bit of google searching, I still don't fully understand what this new ToH is.  If I can find a better Wizards.com summary of it, I'd like to include it for completeness, though.  At this point, I don't know what to add. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, I don't know anything about that.  I can ask around at ENWorld if you like; would be nice to be complete if we are able to ever take this one to FA. BOZ (talk) 15:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be great if you would ask.  I'm sure they'd know. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Amazon says it's not out yet. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to do that in a few hours.  My internet access has gotten pretty... weird. BOZ (talk) 19:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's much closer to normal now. ;) Thread started. BOZ (talk) 02:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Got a few responses already! BOZ (talk) 17:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New one 
Talk:Taylor Field (Regina, Saskatchewan)

message: The official press release doesn't say anything about the name being "Mosaic Stadium at Taylor Field" - it's just "Mosaic Stadium". heqs 23:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also this news story which mentions the longer name, but it seems to have been written before the official announcement. Qutezuce 07:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I heard the longer name last night on the news, but I don't have a reference for it.  They also commented that the field itself will continue to be Taylor Field, but that the stadium will be Mosaic Stadium.  How does that work? -- timc | Talk 13:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it would be like Invesco Field at Mile High or something like that. It will be interesting to see what happens with it. The news story really makes it sound like Taylor Field is to remain part of the name, with his family being involved and all. It's odd that the press release really doesn't jive with it. I imagine there would be backlash in the community over this? heqs 15:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is an article that should clear it up. It says the field is still Taylor Field, but everything else is Mosaic Stadium. Qutezuce 07:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name 

message: Hello all,
I am currently working on the French version of this article, and I am getting the impression that the year of creation should be 1928 instead of 1936. It's in 1928 that the two adjoining parks were united and that the layout of the new playing field, the same that would remain until the end, was made. Improvements were made in 1936, including additional seating, and the Roughriders started playing there regularly, but these were improvements to an already existing facility that was already called Park de Young. My main sources of information are  and . What do you think ? --Cortomaltais (talk) 22:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening: 1928 or 1936 ?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Dance Schools in Oregon

message: I'm tabulating this vote as a consensus to delete. Twenty votes were cast: 15 to delete, 4 to keep, and User:Newager's vote was disallowed due to lack of edits. The final ratio of 3.75:1 constitutes a supermajority in favor of deletion. Fernando Rizo T/C 00:22, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing admin's rationale
Talk:Nuncio

message: 1) currently Apostolic Nuncios and Apostolic Delegates are always Titular Archbishops (in the past, apostolic delegates were sometimes simply titular bishops).
2) Since 1994, new appointments have removed the distinctions between Nuncios, Inter-Nuncios, and Pro-Nuncios. The last two titles are no longer used in the sense mentioned in the article.
3) The term Inter-Nuncio is now sometimes used for the interm head of a nunciature. (For the time when one Nuncio had retired or moved and a new one is named.)
:I've fixed some of the above, but it still needs a good bit of work. Some of it makes no sense currently.--Dcheney 03:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This should be the main article for all types of nuncios and their should be a daughter article for apostolic nuncios. savidan(talk) (e@) 01:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Four little stubs about what are degrees of the same thing is not as useful as a single article, where the differences can be described in the proper context. Additionally, the "other" nuncios all had the adjetive "apostolic" attached as well, such as an apostolic pro-nuncio, apostolic internuncio, etc. Gentgeen 22:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I Second the Gentgeen motion Fastifex 08:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree - I think that the entire article is relevant to the title.--68.32.11.74 01:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree with Gentgeen. Tempshill 03:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Keep it as it is. There is nothing wrong with this article. Dr mindbender 20:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostolic/Papal nuncio should be split 

message: When the Apostolic See is vacated, do the nuncios automatically get suspended like other Vatican officials?  All I know is that the Prefects and Presidents of Pontifical Councils get suspended while the Secretaries and lower-ranking officials keep their posts.  In other countries, ambassadors automatically are out when the home administration changes, so do Vatican ambassadors change with Papal administrations too?J.J. Bustamante 09:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Universi Dominici Gregis #21, "In the same way, the office and attendant powers of Papal Representatives do not lapse." In other words, Nuncios retain their office.--Dcheney 03:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vacancy of the Apostolic See

message: I've reverted the move made today, as the previous title had been in place for over three years without any recorded objections. Please use the RM proces in the future. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Clifford Sifton

message: Another source lists under Sifton's "business interests": "The Winnipeg Free Press; also principally instrumental in the incorporation of The Canadian Western Light, Heat and Power Company." http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/s/i/f/Glen-Sifton/WEBSITE-0001/UHP-0126.html Can this be confirmed in reliable sources? Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Business interests
Talk:Toledo

message: There was also some relevent discussion aobut this disambiguation page at Talk:Toledo, Spain.--Commander Keane 09:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I will concede that the superlative claims listed for Toledo, Spain and Toledo, Ohio are not appropriate for a disambiguation page.  I disagree with User:Everyme that these are "clearly wrong from an encyclopedic perspective", or that they relate in some way to a "juvenile population dick size comparison".  And frankly, I think labeling my reversion as "vandalism" fails to assume good faith.  But I am willing to compromise on removing the verbiage from the disambig page noting the age of Toledo, Spain, and the population of Toledo, Ohio.
In lieu of that, however, I placed hidden text alerting editors to the fact that no primary topic for disambiguation exists for "Toledo".  Too often, this disambiguation page has been edited to inflate the importance of Toledo, Spain; going so far as to redirect this page to that article.  This is unacceptable, as readers (and editors) should be aware that "Toledo" could easily be understood to nominate a number of different topics.  Consensus has been reached to disambiguate the term "Toledo".  Let's keep it that way. -- JeffBillman (talk) 04:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superlative claims/no primary topic for disambiguation 
Talk:Vegoose

message: I have a large selection of photos from Vegoose 2006 posted on a Vegoose tribute webpage.  I'd like to add a link from this artice to the photo page -- stevehopson.com/VegoosePhotos.htm -- and am soliciting the opinions of other editors of this article. SteveHopson 22:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Followup - Since there hasn't been any objection, I'll add the link - if you disagree, please discuss here, thanks.  SteveHopson 04:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think anyone has any problems with that- thanks for sharing the pictures! 63.117.238.241 17:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegoose Photos 
Talk:Vector flow

message: The original version of this article is from User:Fropuff, to whom I wrote:
: While copying (the awful) article flow (mathematics) from planetmath, I stumbled upon your marvelous User:Fropuff/Notes, noted that it had a solid overview of flows, better than anything else that we have on WP, and thus I mangled it into a stand-alone article, titled vector flow. linas 16:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Bosworth

message: This article was plagiarized by http://www.phrconference.org/bios.php#bosworth
See Wikipedia:Copyright_FAQ for how to cite Wikipedia articles.
Rbirkby 20:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Bowsworth played a key role in the creation of the two technologies used in AJAX: Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest.   Dynamic HTML, the ability to modify the structure of a page through script in the page, first made it's appearance in the Trident HTML engine.  Bosworth managed the team that developed Trident.  After building Trident, Bosworth moved on to work on XML technologies.  XMLHttpRequest came of of his work on XML. --76.121.192.106 (talk) 02:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: AJAX

message: I just cleaned up some of the weaselly opinionated crap in the section about Access and Paradox. Let's maintain NPOV, people. Mikepurvis 23:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Microsoft "making notes" incident

message: I researched the XML pioneering reference and there is no verifiable reference. The Wiki XML entry has a different story. Maybe the correct terminology would be: "Early Adopter" or "Early Usage". Does anyone have verifiable sources?
See http://www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/2000/PX02563.pdf
On October 6th 1996, Bosworth says:
"what is needed as soon as possible is a model for extensible grammar (aka DTD)/rendering in the HTML model so that the data required by components with extensible TAGs and Attributes for each such component.
Rbirkby 21:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: XML pioneer?
Talk:Callot Soeurs

message: Good addition!   PKM 00:56, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ainori

message: Um, maybe someone should say something about how the kanji for "ai" is not written, probably with the intent of creating ambiguity  with the word 愛。 (love being a major theme of the show.)
* Sure, it's an （相乗り /  愛乗り) pun.  Why bother explaining it, even a beginner student of Japanese could understand.  Certainly anyone who's interested enough to be watching the show would get it.  --awh (Talk) 08:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Currently the Japanese ainori page lists Poland as the 71st country, because they're counting Japan as the first. The official word from the show's producers has Poland as the 70th country, so that's good enough for me...  --awh (Talk) 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country count 

message: This is about the "memorable moments" section, entry "summer 2006". You guys say that the incident with Fresh- Boy Tagami (or whatever his name was) was due to particpants finding out during a break from the show in JAPAN? What are you talking about? First, participants don't go home until they leave the love bus. No vacations back to Japan. (Hide was famous for being away from Japan for 18 months when he was on the show.) Second- That girl started getting suspicious about him because the male particpants had told her that in their sleeping room he had been bragging about his girlfriend's existence. The way you have it written is incorrect. Watch the episode again.
Generalklagg 13:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: Dose anyone know why Ainori is not on imdb. Could someone with　more info then me add it. Thanks --Steinninn 07:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ainori on imdb 

message: It would seem the Japanese version of this page has been protected after people tried to put in accusations of it being completely staged.  I found this information amusing. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 21:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese version
Talk:Llanwarne

message: I have reworded the family reference added 16 December 2006 by 88.105.87.71 - a mention of the use of "Llanwarne" as a surname (with reference) is useful, but a statement like We have a website at... is out of place in an encylopaedia. - Euchiasmus 08:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Llanwarne family
Talk:Chris Perkins (politician)

message: The text of this page seems to have been copied from , a U.S. Congress website. As such, I believe the text is in the public domain. It does need to be wikified, though. RSpeer 01:15, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
 I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 23:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Days of Being Wild

message: "[..]and is obsessed about his biological mother, who he eventually discovers is a Filipino aristocrat." — Shouldn't this be "a Filipina aristocrat"? — NelC (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipina? 
Talk:Ashes of Time

message: # Brigitte Lin - daughter of Murong clan, later known as Beggars' Sect
What the??
Murong was a name of Family and have no relation with Beggar's sect. I'll delete it. Kunderemp (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murong 

message: I better synopsis of the plot is seriously needed for this film.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.235.74 (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: She is Peach Blossom not Cherry Blossom. (English sub) Dudva (talk) 14:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blossom
Talk:Even Cowgirls Get the Blues (novel)

message: I added a brief mention of the unrelated song by the same name, written by Rodney Crowell, and recorded by Harris, Parton and Ronstadt.  Probably not enough material for a separate entry, but warrants mentioning, just the same.--Markt3 20:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: dude, this article spoiled the book for me. it needs a spoiler warning.
No, it didn't.  Go screw, dude.  Hey, if you ARE retarded, which is what your writing seems to suggest, go ahead and read it, you won't remember the article after 10 seconds anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.73 (talk) 07:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler 

message: On The '59 Sound by The Gaslight Anthem, there's a song with the same name. The lyrics appear unrelated to the book, but perhaps it deserves mention?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by McFlynnTHM (talk • contribs) 16:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaslight Anthem song 
Talk:Last Days (2005 film)

message: The reception part of this page is biased and needs revision.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.19.68.60 (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception

message: Anyone coming to this article will find it poorly written, unsourced, with speculations and original research. It would be nice if someone could clean this up. i may try. I cleaned up the refs as they were, but have not yet added more.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, some clean up, added a few refs. still poorly ref'd, but presumably what is here could be refd. if anyone tries and cannot find refs for any of the material, please feel free to remove it. A published book study of the film would be a good source.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality

message: 58% in Rotten Tomatoes. The movie was polarizing, and this article should reflect that. 181.194.232.3 (talk) 05:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
File talk:Loudspeaker.png

message: This is one of the more user-unfriendly features I've seen recently -- how come clicking on the audio icon doesn't play the audio? Technical reasons?
:Technical reasons.  :-(  — Omegatron 01:36, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
::Ah, well. Too bad.
:::Maybe it's something that should be explored, though.  You could file a bug report.  Certain links have little icons after them that do not follow the normal image rules, so it's not entirely inconceivable that we could do a similar thing for audio files:
:::*external links
:::*secure links
:::*email addresses
:::Probably worth filing a bug report about.  Maybe an external link to an audio file could use the loudspeaker icon, and then we could link like this?  — Omegatron 06:08, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
See Template talk:Audio#Feature request and MediaWiki talk:Common.css#Audio links — Omegatron 20:23, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vivre sa vie

message: Anything on if when it was ever released on DVD or Blu-ray Disc (or even VHS)? --Pmsyyz (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home video release info 

message: The film includes a number of documentary type sections, shot out of doors, employing lightweight cameras, a distinctive feature of the cinema verite style employed at this time by Coutard and other cinematographers.
The inclusion of the reference to Nana's decision to abandon a conventional sexual relationship and child in the first scene of the film gives point to her later deluded choices with respect to a life of prostitution which ends with her sordid death in a backstreet. Given this, it may be sensible to keep this within the plot summary.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmackenzie (talk • contribs) 20:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of Cinema Verite references and character details 

message: Does anyone has any information which could show that this film was influenced by the series of 6 paintings from the 18th century called A Harlot's Progress?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandrasonic (talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influences
Talk:Kiss Me Deadly

message: *  ... plot synopsis, review, cast, production credits, awards
Reference available for citing in the article body. Erik (talk) 20:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Allmovie

message: It might be worth noting this 1955 film shows Mike Hammer using an Answering Machine several times (I Dan tha Man I (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Answering Machine

message: "The gumshoe's subsequent investigation into the woman's death doubles as a lacerating indictment of modern society's dissolution into physical/moral/spiritual degeneracy – a reversion that ultimately leads to nuclear apocalypse and man's return to the primordial sea – with the director's knuckle-sandwich cynicism pummeling the genre's romantic fatalism into a bloody pulp."
I just watched the movie, and it wasn't that good, and it wasn't that bad. At least not as bad as that purple prose review. Wastrel Way (talk) 03:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reponses
Talk:In Search of the Unknown

message: Are B1-3 in anyway linked? Other than being the first 3 modules for Basic Dungeons and Dragons? I think it would be better to use linked module section only where the modules are designed to form a series to be played one after the other (eg I3-5 or A1-4) - Waza 01:41, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They were repackaged as a single package, B1-9.  And I can say that as a teen, I and my friends certainly played them as if they were linked.  I think we can use a commonsense approach about this.  Certainly modules in a given code space were marketed as if they were linked, and I remember treating them that way (although "it should be this way because I remember it" is original research.  Maybe we can find a reference to how other people treated them? Nandesuka 01:50, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

text: see, e.g., .  Here's a random guy who intends to play B2 and then B3, seeming to think they are linked:  .  Here are a bunch of people arguing vehemently about the issue: .  My personal opinion is that TSR's "revamping" of the product into B1-9 was a post-facto recognition that the players were treating these modules as linked.  But I could be convinced that I'm wrong. Nandesuka 01:57, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: B series

message: Added some reviews.  This is the first Basic adventure, I think it's notable. Thoughts? Hobit (talk) 02:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability Tag
Talk:Islands (The Band album)

message: The article says that the album "was simply finished to get the group off of Capitol Records, so that the soundtrack  to their film The Last Waltz could come out on Warner Bros. Records". However, on Levon Helm's bio, it says that "The Band was contracted to Grossman, who in turn had contracted their services to Capitol Records. The arrangement allowed The Band to release work on other labels only if the work was done with Dylan. This later allowed The Band to play on Dylan's Planet Waves album and on The Last Waltz, both non-Capitol releases." Who's right? --viniciusmc (talk) 12:21, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Jericho (The Band album)

message: Wasn't Richard Manuel dead by the time this album was recorded?66.7.119.190 03:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: There's no mention of the remastered reissue of the album that was released in 2006. I came here looking for info on how it compared and otherwise differed from the original release but there's nothing. :( --anon. 141.157.227.38 (talk) 02:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remastered reissue