lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Collectivism (disambiguation)/Archive 1

message: To imply collectivism as tantamount to fascism and that individuality is the end-all, be-all does seem to skew the article highly. It'd be more appropriate to state positive as well as negative examples, such as corporatism and bi-national states.
I've rewritten it, not as detailed, but I hope more neutral in point of view.
----
To Milneau Trudnea, Fascism, Marxism is collectivism.  How these words are not in the article is hard to realize.WHEELER 18:55, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. "I am right and you are wrong". Such an astute argument! Tell me, how long did it take you to come up with that brilliant insight? -- Mihnea Tudoreanu 17:46, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Thats what I have been trying to say all along. Sam [Spade] 20:20, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, my name is Mihnea Tudoreanu, and I've grown rather tired of you misspelling it. Here's a hint: Use the copy & paste function. Now, as for your claims, please notice that I did not say the term "collectivism" was invented by Ayn Rand. I did, however, mention the fact that objectivists use the term more than anyone else. -- Mihnea Tudoreanu 17:46, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Prove it. Cite sources. Just the facts, ma'am. Sam [Spade] 18:32, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation toward fascism
Talk:Pat-a-cake, pat-a-cake, baker's man

message: How far back can this rhyme be traced? Have Peter and Iona Opie written about this rhyme? -- The Anome 13:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Taking a cue from the rhyme, a modern shallow muffin tin, often with a rounded bottom, are called "patty cake" pans, but I have no idea when they first appeared. Janko (talk) 11:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patty Cake Pans 

message: I'm nearly sure that the original version was...
Roll it in flour and mark it with TEA.
When you brush tea on bread it leaves a dark stain after baking, and can be used to write initials onto a loaf to distinguish it from the other ones.  
Probably people heard "T" instead of tea., not knowing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DHBoggs (talk • contribs) 19:45, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark it With... 

message: When I was a toddler, I remember hearing "for baby and me" instead of "for baker and me". There should be more research into these alternative lyrics JayBirdtyper (talk) 02:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby?
Talk:Creedence Clearwater Revival (album)

message: What is the source of this information?  I've read countless bios on Creedence and never once have I read that Suzie Q. was a shared vocal effort between John and Tom Fogerty.
Also, the album credit information is QUITE incomplete.  The original recording engineer was Walt Payne, I believe.  The Japanese gentlemen listed are the engineers responsible for the modern re-master of the album(s).  It's amazing the information that was 'forgotten' when vinyl got shoved aside to make way for digital.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.30.202.18 (talk) 00:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shared vocals on "Suzie Q." 

message: Getting pretty tired of Allmusic pretending it existed in the sixties. This is no indication at all of how the album was received at the time.142.232.98.47 (talk) 01:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Wow, this album actually came out in May?  Because CCR played our high school prom in June and nobody had ever heard of them.  The prom committee got them because they were cheap.  :)  I always brag that they played our prom.
06:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1968
Talk:Bayou Country (album)

message: Poorly written article. Much more can be added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.22.253 (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor 
Talk:Woomera Immigration Reception and Processing Centre

message: shouldn't IRPC be expanded in the title?--ZayZayEM 02:08, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (acronyms) states: "Convention: Avoid the use of acronyms in page naming unless the term you are naming is almost exclusively known only by its acronyms and is widely known and used in that form (NASA, SETI, and radar are good examples)." So, it probably should be changed to the expanded name, I suppose. I made it an acronym originally because "Immigration Reception and Processing Centre" is such a long winded name, and these places are generally known as plain old "detention centres" rather than their official title. - Borofkin 03:19, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: Um, any tips on capitalisation? Should it be "Woomera Immigration Reception and Processing Centre"? I need to get it right before I create the other detention centres so I don't have to redo them... - Borofkin 04:41, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ealier comments

message: If it belongs anywhere, the stuff about Pauline Hanson would belong in a more general section (such as :mandatory detention in Australia), not this article. Andjam 08:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably correct. I think I created that section when I was thinking about making this article Featured. I reckon it could be a candidate for the Main page one day, if someone wanted to spend the time on it. - Borofkin 06:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've excised two paragraphs, and changed a heading. I'm not sure if it'd be able to be a featured article, but it could become a WP:GA (good article), if enough work was done. Andjam 13:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background section
Talk:Green River (album)

message: Unfortunately, ALL the Creedence album pages are missing vital informaton.  Russ Gary, the original engineer on Green River, is not even mentioned here.  Whoever created the page used CDs as his source; a big oversight.  The original vinyl albums should be used as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.30.202.18 (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production credits 

message: the lodi part, as it is, is nothing but a lodi crap. please get some sources or i will remove it. 74.192.12.135 (talk) 01:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: This site: [Lodi] has this excellent music.Agre22 (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Video with this music
Talk:As Nasty as They Wanna Be

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: Is it just me or does it sound like a sample of Willie Nelson doing a vocal on "Dick Almighty"? Specifically, saying "A hard man is good to find." FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Willie Nelson
Talk:Avala

message: ----
What does this mean?
:It has been protected since 1859.
Dori | Talk 03:07, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
:It means that it's under protection as a natural monument or a national monument or whatever. I'm not sure how to rephrase it to make it clear.
--Messlo 14:12, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: The peak (what you would call BPX) needs to be a minimum of 1,000 metres above sea level to be classed as mountainous, apart from that, I have no quarrels with the other information! Celtmist 14-12-05
...sorry, 1,000 feet, maybe 600 metres - I mixed it slightly, but I still think 511 metres might just be below mountain level. Still, I accept its name is MOUNT Avala. The Celt 17-12-05
Anything over 500m is considered a mountain.-- Krytan talk 19:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a mountain

message: I read today in the article: nicknamed one of two "Belgrade mountains" (the other one being the mountain of Kosmaj). 
Personally, I've never heared such saying. The border between Sumadija and Belgrade-area lays behind the Avala (stated by Cvijic, Erdeljanovic and others). Kosmaj is belonging - geographically and ethnologically - to Sumadija, not Belgrade.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luzzifer (talk • contribs) 16:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Administrative borders of Belgrade were not defined by Cvijic, Erdeljanovic etc. but by politicians and these borders include Kosmaj as well.--Avala (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The mere word "nicknamed" implies it's not official, just something "cool" to say - "we have 2 mountains in Belgrade", when they are actually far out on the edge of city. Maybe it should be rephrased into something like "one of two mountains in the Belgrade city teritory". I believe it's true, though it would be way better if you can find a map marked with both city limits and mountain names. Messlo (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kosmaj - a Belgrade mountain? 

message: "According to Serbian president Boris Tadic, Avala is the highest and the most beautiful mountain in Serbia!" I may be seriously falling behind on following the news but Citation needed on this one. Short Google search failed to produce this statement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.1.45 (talk) 10:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tadic statement 
Talk:Cosmo's Factory

message: All tracks recorded June 1970, except for † recorded March 1970 and recorded late 1969.
First off, I see no uses of the † in the track listing, nor does the "recorded March 1970 and recorded late 1969" comment make any sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.26.196 (talk) 06:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article had the release date as July 16, citing the 1991 CD booklet. However, the album appeared on Billboard's Top Albums the week of July 25. I've been looking at dozens of album release dates and comparing them to Billboard chart debuts, and 9 days apart just doesn't happen; particularly since that Billboard issue was on sale July 18. To give one example with a well-documented release date, LET IT BE was released May 8 and appeared on the chart in the May 30 issue. Three weeks is typical for the most popular artists; less well known ones are further apart. So I went to see if I could find a contemporary source that would give a true release date. And found it. Cash Box July 18, 1970, page 42, states that Cosmo's Factory was released July 8. PatConolly (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Boys Don't Cry (band)

message: I can't find any more information regarding the result of this lawsuit.  Considering it was filed in 1997, it's probably settled by now.  Does anyone know anything more? --Ricky81682 03:25, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
I, too, couldn't find much more than mentions on someone's blog (with a link to Rolling Stones that is now dead). But I did find an article where they also sued Kid Rock for his Cowboy song. Kid Rock accused of biting 80s synth tune for cowboy. There is no follow up to see what happened with the lawsuit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.200.236.200 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pendulum (Creedence Clearwater Revival album)

message: ==Track order appears different==
The track order appears different on what I believe to be the original album sleeve, see the iTunes digital booklet page #2 which from memory looks like the album backside:
1) Chameleon
2) Molina
3) It's Just a Thought
4) (Wish I Could) Hideaway
5) Pagan Baby
6) Sailor's Lament
7) Born to Move
8) Have You Ever Seen the Rain
9) Rude Awakening #2
10) Hey Tonight
I don't recall the actual order on the album itself...
-daddyo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.88.62 (talk) 06:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: The track order appears different on what I believe to be the original album sleeve, see the iTunes digital booklet page #2 which from memory looks like the album backside:
1) Chameleon
2) Molina
3) It's Just a Thought
4) (Wish I Could) Hideaway
5) Pagan Baby
6) Sailor's Lament
7) Born to Move
8) Have You Ever Seen the Rain
9) Rude Awakening #2
10) Hey Tonight
I don't recall the actual order on the album itself...
-daddyo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.88.62 (talk) 06:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Track order appears different
Talk:Mardi Gras (album)

message: I've added citation requests for the claims that the songwriter produced his own song instead of the band which the record labels state.  Without the citation, the individual producer credits will be removed from the song listings. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer credit 
Talk:Lee Ving

message: Could someone who knows something about the "I'm a close personal friend of Lee Ving" bumper stickers post something about them? Thanks. --Godfrey Daniel (talk) 14:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He sold them on the first Lee Ving's Army/Fear tour in the 90s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.247.169 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Close personal friend? 

message: someone please edit and verify this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.173.39.87 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 1 November 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For example the city and year of birth differ from his IMDB entry --Saga City (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even this article itself gives two places of birth: Minneapolis, Minnesota and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. --Mal7798 (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: It's not Lee James Jude, the tattoo on his left arm you can see in Decline of Western Civilization? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.242.136  (talk • contribs) 04:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lee Ving's real name 

message: I don't understand this - Lee's never been accused of being a Nazi. This stuff has no place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.28.110 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAZI? 

message: Is there any other source for the Daybreak episode other than Lee's homepage? Is this record related to it? It's from NYC, it's 1977, but the credits don't match. --Grueslayer (talk) 08:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daybreak
Talk:Ornament and Crime

message: This was formerly in the second paragraph: 
One appreciates classic references by musicians, much like the reference by one band that took its name from a famous ornament referenced in the book Naked Lunch, but that is another story. Guess not all ornaments go out of style, given how long lived "Steely Dan" lasted.
:This article begs for some reaction from others, especially recent opinions. Myself, I think that it is a crime to make a moral imperative out of a matter of style. Lack of ornamentation is itself a style, which can become unfashionable. Loos would be shocked at how modern man has devolved to immoral and uncivilized circumstances by tattoos every bit as prevalent as in Papuan society.
:Most industries never took this very seriously, the one exception being architecture. Even in architecture we see a restrained use of ornament returning to modern buildings. Compare, for instance, the Petronas Towers with earlier skyscrapers. There may be an appropriate quote from the Prince of Wales that can be found. Dlw20070716 (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "Even in architecture we see a restrained use of ornament returning to modern buildings". Yes, it's called postmodernism. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Radio documentary

message: This is a lot worse than a stub... cleanup or VfD?  Falcon 05:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm hoping to organize this page better so that it can move beyond a stub. To start I'm adding a significant section on the history/origins of radio documentary. Please help make this page better!
C pal (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page revamp 

message: The Alan Hall listed on this page is the radio producer, still alive and producing, not to be confused with the late cell biologist Alan Hall, to whose page it is erroneously linked. ~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callisto the bear (talk • contribs) 19:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Alan Hall
Talk:Xenia Seeberg

message: some one needs to ask her if we can use a photo of her here Maximusnukeage 05:03, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC) (unsigned)
If she has a degree in latin, then  she speaks latin, right?
63.164.201.145 07:05, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A.k.a. Cartoon

message: Should its logo be added?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4701:C4A0:3917:35D:AC51:626C (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Tōhoku region

message: It seems that I nearly made a royal mess of things, due to a newbie mistake in September of moving Tohoku region to Tōhoku Region.  The R should be an r, and halfway through redirecting the articles that point here this week, I remembered that little fact.  Compounding it with putting a macron in the title when they are not agreed on yet, I think it is best to put this page back at Tohoku region where it was, before it got in the way of my bumbling around learning the ropes.  (Of the other regions, only Kantō has the macron title.  Chubu, Kyushu, etc do not.)  Fixing the double redirects now, and I'll wait a few days for comments before moving everything to point to Tohoku region in case anyone really feels strongly that it should be Tōhoku region instead.  Neier 01:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Scratching out the last comment, as macrons are now proliferating. Neier 21:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name
Talk:Farmhouse

message: This page was originally documenting an album and an album only, hence the current predicament of farmhouse (building) being where it is. I think it is generally accepted that the name "farmhouse" would be most obviously a type of building (as opposed to say, bow which would have many different contexts), ie. on par with DNA and ATP. The links to the new disambiguation page on the other two articles can then be updated. Hence, I request that this page should be moved to farmhouse (disambiguation), then farmhouse (building) moved to farmhouse. -- Natalinasmpf 06:50, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. –Hajor 02:55, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Every culture in the world from every time period since the invention of agriculture has farmhouses so this is a very basic subject and an overview of farmhouses would be interesting and very broad. Maybe just starting with a list of farmhouse types would be a start. Jim Derby (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  improvements 

message: In the United States, farmhouses were initially fairly basic and utilitarian structures...more ornate by early 19th century..eventually large houses to mansions common....Victorian era...still built reflective of independence. B137 (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States section draft 

message: This site has a list of references that could be used to add information about British farmhouses if anyone can get access to the books or journals. Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Interdict

message: The first sentence is clumsy or even ungrammatical: the core of it is "...ban...that the rites..." It looks like art by committee. Someone  who knows both canon law and English ought to fix it.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.245.188.249 (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: I recall reading somewhere that anointing of the sick, at least in the form of last rites, was the only sacrament allowed under an interdict. Can anyone confirm if this is true? If so, the article should make mention of this. -R. fiend 17:49, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Last rites

message: The anthropologist's view does not belong on this page, but on Maltese history. It will be moved to Malta's talk page, where an editor there can incorporrate it into that article. JBogdan 21:11, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anthropologist views

message: A contributor insists on referring to the interdiction in the 1960s of voters of the Malta Labour Party going as far as to create a section called "Twentieth century examples". This prejudices the article's NPOV through giving this episode undue wieght.
First, why 20th century examples? If we're seeking to be up-to-date why not quote cased from the 21st century where there are instances of the Church using interdiction to influence voting? If any century would do why not the 18th, or the 15th, or the 12th?
The interdiction of Malta Labour Party voters is insignificant in a general article on interdiction. As has been stated on undue weight "If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority, it does not belong in Wikipedia (except perhaps in some ancillary article) regardless of whether it is true or not; and regardless of whether you can prove it or not."
The case is already mentioned in the entry on the Malta Labour Party and Michael Gonzi. No further reference is warranted. Not to mention the fact that there are a number of significant factual inaccuracies (e.g. interdiction was not lifted in 1969 but in 1964).
Demdem (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think it gives undue weight, then find other examples for balance.  I have found two more - all cited.  But instead your aim seems to be to remove information - your latest POV censorship .   Since your main interest is Malta, it looks as if you are trying to hide something. Twice interdicting half a country for several years for political reasons is an important example of how this power is used. --08:35, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference prejudical to NPOV 

message: 1961 - 1969 period, when there was an interdict against the Labour Party, is both under "notable local" and "notable personal" sections.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.79.110.68 (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it. 20:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Mentions of Malta
Talk:Katsura Imperial Villa

message: I removed the text stating that KIV is a World Heritage Site. My reason is that it is not on the list at . If I've looked at the wrong list, please revert, and I'd be grateful if you'd let me know the source. Fg2 02:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Heritage? 

message: Though I agree that the villa and garden are amazing, the lead section uses some vague, POV and unsourced statements like "...one of Japan's most important large-scale cultural treasures.", "Its gardens are a masterpiece of Japanese gardening, and the buildings are even more important, one of the greatest achievements of Japanese architecture.", "...provides an invaluable window into...". Interestingly the villa is neither a world heritage site nor a National Treasure of Japan. Why? Maybe its importance could be supported by quotes of architects (Bruno Taut) or other people. PS: The "How to get there" section looks a bit like wikitravel and could be removed in my opinion.bamse (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 