Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Christopher Sundita

message: 2006-08-17 he abused his admin rights. He violated WP:DEL
# 17:44, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) moved Iloilo (province) to Iloilo (Back to Iloilo.) (revert)
# 17:44, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) deleted "Iloilo" (Deleted to make way for move.)
# 17:43, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) moved Talk:Iloilo to Talk:Iloilo (disambiguation) (Iloilo will be for the province.) (revert)
# 17:43, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) moved Iloilo to Iloilo (disambiguation) (Iloilo will be for the province.) (revert)
# 17:41, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) moved Pangasinan (province) to Pangasinan (rv move by Tobias Conradi) (revert)
# 17:41, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) deleted "Pangasinan" (Deleted to make way for move.)
# 17:38, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) moved Cebu (province) to Cebu (rv move by Tobias Conradi) (revert)
# 17:38, 17 August 2006 Christopher Sundita (Talk | contribs) deleted "Cebu" (Deleted to make way for move.) 
It is reported to him.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChristopher_Sundita&diff=70278584&oldid=70174909
Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

message: It is here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. And when you disagree with an admin and s/he reverts what you've done, that is still NOT abuse. Work towards consensus. If you fail to get consensus, or if your idea isn't applied, and an admin pursues the idea by the community, ypu shouldn't cry foul and say vandalism and/or abuse. --Howard the Duck 06:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: please respect the WP policies. Admins are not allowed to execise their special powers in editorial disputes they are themselves involved in. The page deletions were out of policy. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 16:05, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the place to do this 

message: Christopher_Sundita,
Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process.  We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate.  In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.  Congraluations on being granted the Admin mop, and we are confident the group made the right decision in your case!
In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process.  The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations.  We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies.  We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.
This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.
Take the survey
Thank you!
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.
CMUResearcher (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research