Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Avatar: The Last Airbender task force/Archive 3

message: I'm not a member of this WikiProject, but I just wanted to point out that "The Western Air Temple" has already aired on YTV. So I'm asking for a go-ahead to create, or at the least, unprotect the page. Blue Mirage (talk) 12:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We have had the same problem with "The Day of Black Sun". Until it airs in the U.S., it is preferred that since this is an American TV Show that an article not be created. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 16:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong. Its aired, so go ahead and create it if you want. US isn't the entire world. Granted, the way things are going it may be a waste of time and effort, but that's another story.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Fine, if that is how you see it. Either way, if you scroll up just about half-a-page, you will see the big argument about the episode articles. Unless you can write an article that has a lot of real world information, it, along with every other episode article, will be deleted soon. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 21:11, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Western Air Temple 

message: Is anyone still working on merging the episode articles into seasons? Ridernyc (talk) 01:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you helping? I am busy with life right now so I can't devote much effort to it. The Placebo Effect (talk) 01:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead an redirect the articles to help encourage work on season articles. For anyone that comes here from my edit summary, the first season in progress can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Avatar: The Last Airbender/season 1. TTN (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need to redirect to allow work on season articles when the info has been merge there will be time to put in redirects.YetanotherGenisock (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also no reason to leave them sitting there while no one is working on the season pages. Ridernyc (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If no one is working on the season pages no mergeing is takeing place soo we might as well stick with the episode pages for the time being.YetanotherGenisock (talk) 16:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

text: HOw instead of edit warring people actually try to make improvement's The have bee no edits to the season article in 3 weeks. On the surface this project looks like it has a ton of members but I don't see them active in the project, I just6 see them adding plot details to articles that the project is trying to get rid. An edit war over redirects will the end just to things to AFD. Ridernyc (talk) 13:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes 

message: I am removing MizaBot II from archiving talk page to clean up archives. I will put it back after I am finished.  Earthbendingmaster 21:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There we go, much better.  Earthbendingmaster 21:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 

message: === WP:FICT has been revised ===
WP:FICT, the notability guideline for elements within a work of fiction (characters, places, elements, etc) has a new proposal/revision that is now live  Everyone is encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page. Ned Scott 22:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines 

message: WP:FICT, the notability guideline for elements within a work of fiction (characters, places, elements, etc) has a new proposal/revision that is now live  Everyone is encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page. Ned Scott 22:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:FICT has been revised 

message: There is a proposal to split WP:EPISODE into a more general notability guideline, Wikipedia:Notability (serial works), and make the rest of WP:EPISODE just a MOS guideline. Please join in at WT:EPISODE#Proposed split of EPISODE and/or Wikipedia talk:Notability (serial works). -- Ned Scott 22:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Notability (serial works) 

message: SO the season finale will be coming soon. The best way to celebrate this is with an article is the FAOTD. So the question is, which article? My opnion is the main characters. I have a fansite that could have a poll to vote on which article we should work on. Do we want to have fans choose which character, or should we choose the character? The Placebo Effect (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently I am devoting most of my time to working on Aang. The only thing holding it back is the fact that we have no references or information that allows us to add out-of-universe context. If everybody could search the web for anything, I am sure we could build up the creation and conception section as well as the character reception section at the bottom of the article. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 18:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work on a featured article 

message: Hey everybody, if you venture over to Template:Wikipedia ads, you will see ad #118, the brand new Avatar Wikiproject ad. I was getting bored so I decided to help the project in some way. I hope everybody at the project likes it. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 16:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisment 

message: Just as a notice, there is an important discussion going on at Talk:List of Avatar: The Last Airbender secondary recurring characters/Qualifications about which characters in the List of Avatar: The Last Airbender secondary recurring characters article are notable enough to be included. There are currently only three people participating, and it would be appreciated if as many people as possible made a comment or two in order to help determine consensus. Thanks. 00:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Not to be a deletionist doesn't it seem as if we could merge a lot of the articles into one another. For instance, a lot of the information in Air Nomads, Water Tribes, Fire Nation, and Earth Kingdom are speculation that might not even be true. It would make the article much more accurate if we merged it into one article like Avatar: The Last Airbender universe or Four nations of Avatar: The Last Airbender (I am not a good article-name-maker). Just wanted some comments. (Just as a note, I do not plan on merging the character articles or anything like that.) — Parent5446 (t n c k e l) 03:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Universe Articles 

message: Ba Sing Se is up for deletion.  Hobit (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ba Sing Se 

message: The media page has the usual benders argument, does anyone know if there's been proof at all? Keyblade Mage (talk) 01:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media info 

message: Avatar: The Last Airbender media information has been nominated for deletion. Here is the nomination. — Parent5446 (t n c k e l) 12:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avatar: The Last Airbender media information 

message: Ba Sing Se is up for deletion again. Here is a transclusion of the discussion:
— Parent5446 (t [ n] c k e [ l]) 19:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ba Sing Se 

message: I just thought that I would propose that the bending articles be trimmed and merged. I don't really know much about that whole process, but I think that it would be better for organizational purposes to merge all the information into one article. Also helps lower the amount of Avatar articles and a trimming would definitely take place. Any thoughts? Just an idea.... SkepticBanner (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, this whole WikiProject has come to a standstill. I do not mean this in article development, but in discussion. What I mean is that not a whole lot of people are going to see this. Personally, I agree. In fact, if you examined all of the Avatar articles, they are filled with crap and redundant plot summaries that could probably be reduced to about five to seven articles (even the Aang, Katara, Sokka, and Toph articles could be merged; in fact, in Aang's FAC, a user commented that if the article could not be expanded anymore, than there was really no purpose for a separate article. however, I am not willing to go that drastic so soon). What I suggest is that you slowly but surely filter out the crap from each bending article. When the articles are condensed to the point where they comply with policy, they should be a couple of paragraphs. Then be bold and merge them. I would help you out but I am more concerned on the Season One article which is in GAN right now. If I can help, I will pop in and trim a little every once in a while. — Parent5446 (t [ n] e [ l]) 02:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem is, I've never tried merging an article before. But I'll get to the bending articles like you said. SkepticBanner (talk) 01:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the Bending Articles? 

message: Are we a separate WikiProject or are we a task force of the Television Wikiproject? Because WP:TV says we are, and if we are, wouldn't be more appropriate to move this page to a sub-page of WP:TV and merge  with . Or is this completely wrong and the Television WikiProject is assuming us as their child WikiProject. Just a question. — Parent5446 (t [ n] e [ l]) 03:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to be a subproject.... Rau's Speak Page 03:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither do I. Maybe we should consult with somebody from WT:TV about this. — Parent5446 (t [ n] e [ l]) 14:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I'll do it now. Rau's Speak Page 17:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it really even matter? I mean, there's hardly any Avatar articles left anymore. They're all getting deleted. Might as well just be a task force, seeing as there's not really much left for a project to do...--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be so dismal. The activity of a project is not determined by how many articles it has but how much progress it makes. We still have a significant amount of articles that can be improved. And our lack of articles does not make us a task force either. The Simpsons articles are watched by a task force, and they have much more than we do. (Sorry if I seem to be targeting anybody.) I think if we can get some more articles to GA, maybe start a PR on a couple of articles, we could get somewhere. — Parent5446 (t [ n] e [ l]) 19:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Project 

message: List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes is up for FLRC due to lack of sourcing, MoS compliance, and more. Here is the nomination:
— Parent5446 ☯ ([ message] email) 12:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes]] FLRC 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme 

message: Can't we just expand the list of characters section, well at least add a few sentences per character, you know, their nationality, friends and allies? Dar book (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's already at the current list. Rau's Speak Page 15:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Secondary Characters 

message: I think that if we can bring this back to FL, Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) up to GA, and either Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1) or Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2) up to FA, then we can get a featured topic on this subject! A Very interesting prospect indeed:
Current Status:
* Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)
* Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1)
* Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2)
* Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)
Required Status:
* Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)
* or  Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1)
* or  Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 2)
* Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) 
--haha169 (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to try to simply things, if I may. Atleast two of the following four articles must be Featured class, all must be atleast GA status. Blackngold29 04:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Topic 

message: I hardly ever see anyone on the list of members actually editing the Avatar articles. I think we need to do a roll call to update the list. Thoughts? Rau's Speak Page 00:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not watch the show consistantly from the beginning, but I have enjoyed seeing various episodes whenever they've been replayed. I intend to buy the complete DVD (hopefully it will follow soon after the Season 3 one) whenever it comes. I can't promise to be a regular contributer, but if anyone ever needs a peer review or suggestions on anything please let me know. Blackngold29 00:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Once I have a good idea of who's still active in the Task Force, I want to get the Featured Topic thingy. So, we might need some of the stuff you offered. Rau's Speak Page 01:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: You're gonna need two of the articles a Featured status to do that. I would recomend working on getting the episode list first, (I agree with the discussion about it to eliminate the episode descriptions). I was also confused as the Seasons 1 and 2 being considered "articles" where the Lost seasons are considered "lists", despite containing the same info. Thoughts on that? Blackngold29 01:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I really have no idea. But wait, if they are lists, does GA apply? Rau's Speak Page 02:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: No, it's either a List or a Featured List. Blackngold29 02:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. Huh. Well, this needs to be rectified. I'll do that. Rau's Speak Page 02:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roll Call 

message: A new version of List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes is currently under construction at my Sandbox. Please contribute there. Rau's Speak Page 03:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, the optimum list to emulate is List of Smallville episodes. It makes sense and gives each article an appropriate amount of information. -- Chickenmonkey X  sign?  03:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I figure we should take a bit from them all. BlacknGold recommended List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes, List of 30 Rock episodes, and List of Lost episodes. I think if we take a little from a lot we will get better results. Rau's Speak Page 04:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Smallville one definately looks like the quickest way to do it. Not much beyond an intro. Blackngold29 04:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, the main "problem" with the current way it's being done is that the episode summaries are repeated both on the episode list and on the individual season articles. Again, just my opinion, but that just doesn't seem to make sense (List of 30 Rock episodes has this same problem). It would seem the most sensible way to do this is to simply list the episodes in the episode list and save the summaries for the season articles, as the Smallville list, Lost list, and Degrassi: TNG list have done it. -- Chickenmonkey X  sign?  05:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking over a bunch of FLs I agree with you. I'm gonna do season one right now and see how it looks. You can leave any other comments on Rau's sandbox talk page. Thanks! Blackngold29 05:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FL 

message: None of them seem to have a drop of notability, perhaps together in one article, summarized and with some creator commentary they would be GA. It's a good idea, since today they would all be deleted at AFD on their own. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By "Universe" do you mean the nations? Rau's Speak Page 16:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I mean when you look at the Avatar article template at the bottom of the avatar articles, it says Universe: and then lists the nations of this series. They are prime merger candidates I think. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge all the Universe articles together 

message: In my opinion, Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 1) is probably ready to be nominated for a featured list. What do you guys think? NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 00:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bumping this, as it failed because no one visited the FLC :( Come on guys. Anything you feel that we should do before I resubmit it? NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 19:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FLC for Season one 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Avatar: The Last Airbender 

message: OK guys, here is the plan. There are so few articles we should be able to make them all featured. Here is the way I see it:
:Bending articles can prboubly be merged into one article.
:We need to work on our main article.
:Characters: Lets start with Aang, since he is the most important. Once we get him done, we can use that as a template for the other characters.
What have I missed? The Placebo Effect (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Articles 

message: At the past few times at Featured Topics, I have noticed that several people have encouraged us to merge Fire Nation, Earth Kingdom, Water Tribe, and Air Nomads. I shall be doing so shortly, and also merging Bending in Avatar: The Last Airbender into the new article, Universe of Avatar: The Last Airbender. This should provide enough notability to hit Good Article, the main goal of this entire Wikiproject :) NuclearWarfare (Talk) 22:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. My only concern is that the article might be too long. -Dylan0513 (talk) 23:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 150 kilobytes in the article. Not bad. Now we just have to remove all the overdetailing, and add more of actually important stuff. Using  to cite everything would be a good idea as well. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 23:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, remove a lot of details. xD. Hmm, I wonder if we could ever get the article featured.. considering the point of the article is to be in-universe, they couldn't really complain it has no out of universe material. -Dylan0513 (talk) 23:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nations merged 

message: I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks!  - Jarry1250 (t, c) 22:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milestone Announcements 

message: Holy darn, that took a while. Anyway, Universe of Avatar: The Last Airbender is up. I've taken the liberty of marking it as B-class, as it doesn't fit C but isn't close to the GAN process, and might never be. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 02:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I'm WHSL. I mainly edit at Wikia, where I am an admin on Avatar Wiki (under "The 888th Avatar"). So there's no doubt I know about Avatar. Ya, about this Universe article, I'm going to try shorten it when I have time. WHSL (Talk) 07:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universe Up 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 04:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Please see Talk:Avatar: The Last Airbender#Merge proposal for my plan to merge List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters into Avatar: The Last Airbender#Characters. NuclearWarfare (Talk) 20:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge list of characters to main article 

message: Hey all, List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes is up for FLRC. I am posting this message here as this is the main Wikiproject associated with that list, as well as at Talk:Avatar: The Last Airbender, because I figure that more people watch that page. I'd appreciate if someone else could help me out in fixing the issue with the citation templates (ie, taking the bare urls, and putting them within the full version of , without deleting any parameters). I would ask that this message not be taken as canvassing (ie, don't go vote keep at that FLRC just because you saw this message), but instead that you take this oppurtunity to help one of WP:AVATAR's lists out. NW (Talk) (How am I doing?) 16:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Avatar: The Last Airbender episodes]] up for FLRC 

message: Hi. I'm a member of the task force, though I do not edit very much to the project's articles. This mainly because I generally focus on television episode articles, which this task force currently does not create (well, except of course for Sozin's Comet). However, I do believe that episode articles would be both practical, probable, and interesting (FT, anyone?) I own the last volume of Book 4 and all volumes for Book 3, which all contain DVD commentaries for episodes; therefore, production info is a no-brainer for the episodes included (plus, there's always other sources which contain info on the show) As for reception, IGN and several other credible websites review the show, which opens up several pieces of info for that section. 
I believe this would be a good direction for the project to take. What are everyone's thoughts? Cheers! The Flash {talk} 21:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: I think we should make pages about each kingdom. If not make one for all of them. Spongie555 (talk) 04:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingdoms 

message: :I vote for the new one. With the seasons separated into columns with the video game that belongs with that season and the movie that belongs with that season, plus the characters and the episode separated from the group titles, only makes the template look better. However, I would prefer this template, rather than the one above. And may I ask why we are questioning the old, old one? this would be something worth comprimising about (with some adjustments). ChaosMasterChat 01:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I vote for the old one:

message: I think the new one is organized in a way that make more sense and helps with navigation better, plus it can accommodate expansion of the universe better ---CodeHydro 00:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote for the old one (the one without the weird season separation). That is the way the template has always been, and while the design is not perfect (the season links cannot be seen well), the new design looks really weird. The video games and live-action movie being grouped together is bad enough, but to categorize them under the different seasons just because they were based on those seasons? No, absolutely not. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 01:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Changingmy  vote from this one to one under subhead "Best of both worlds? (Outsider friendly)"---CodeHydro 15:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I vote for the new one:

message: :The spin-off redirects to A:TLA article. Other than that, I renamed the group titles, redid the seasons, and deleted a redundant section. It incorperates the original template, the template I designed, and the one CodeHydro designed. ChaosMasterChat 01:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think the extra row for the seasons articles is unnecessary when you have the Episodes row for that. And I would not name the third section Universe, as it is kind of misleading. And how are the topics in Related different than that in Universe? — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 02:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested template

message: Ah, old Codehydro gets it now... I was quite confused at why the book, films, and games were all being placed under the season headers... that's why I redesigned it in the first place. I didn't know that the film and games were tied to specific Avatar books. The old template was too confusing for outsiders like me who don't watch Avatar and implied that the film and games were part of the television show. However, now that I understand what's going on a little better, here's what I came up with: (Note: There is a hidden spin-off section for when that Korra show takes off and gets it own article)
How do you all like it? While some sections have few items for now, remember, I'm designing this to accommodate future expansion without rework---CodeHydro 14:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the creators at the top idea, but the video games are still confusing. It should say somehow that they are video games rather than just putting their title. And I still do not really like categorizing the video games by season. It just does not make sense. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 17:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The video games are based on each season (plus the movie). I made some minor adjustments. The seasons are fine as the books. I also added a space and reorganized the Book One section. For now, I think it will work. The creators at the top are an excellent idea, may I add. ChaosMasterChat 19:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I tweaked it to have the years next to the games. That's basically a convention that tells you it's either a game or a film, which even people who know nothing about the series can figure out easy as soon as they click the article anyhow. As for adding the seasons back to the "Series" group, I would think that the redundancy would be helpful for outsiders, and the seasons really don't take up much space (especially if you do the compact way in the first "new version" that I designed. ---CodeHydro 19:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But nobody is going to know that The Burning Earth is referring to a video game unless they knew beforehand what the game was, which defeats the point of the navbox entirely. Furthermore, while it might make sense to us to put the video games next to the seasons they were based on, a reader is not going to deduce that same fact just because the articles were placed next to their respective seasons. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 21:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Parent5446, I completely understand your point, and if I could think of a better way to organize it that would communicate that it is a video game, then I would. But the point is, the main purpose of the navbox is navigation, as it says in the wiki link. It's not the primary job of the navbox (neither the secondary nor the tertiary for that matter) to tell you what the title is about; that's the job of the article itself. Moreover, I have faith that a reader can draw the link between "Book Two: Earth" and "The Burning Earth" as well as "Book Three: Fire" and "Into the Inferno". Even if they don't, it's not exactly going to hurt them. Nonetheless, to prevent confusion among future editors of the navbox, I've added an invisible comment in the navbox that describes why it's broken into books.---CodeHydro 22:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is a better way to organize it: leave the season associations out. No reader is going to need to look for Avatar video games based on a specific season, they just want to see the different video games. Associating them with their seasons is absolutely useless and misleading. The video games should just be but in a video games row. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 23:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

text: It looks a little better. I still think the Seasons thing is too confusing. Otherwise, looks good, but why is Appa in the Universe section? — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 00:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Best of both worlds? (Outsider friendly)

message: I think the most notable name for this character is just Toph. She seems to be the only character that's got a full name on the profile. What do you think. Jhenderson777 (talk) 18:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think in cases like this, it is just better to keep the full name. The redirect Toph does the job fine for those who don't like full names.  —CodeHydro 16:11, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Same the other way around too. But since I noticed Wikia does it too I suppose I am ok with it. Jhenderson777 (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Either way they end up in the same place. We could probably go on for weeks arguing which is more proper, but it'd just be a waste of time and effort. :) — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 18:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the name Toph Bei Fong to Toph? 

message: I'm not sure how many people monitor WP:MOSTV or even WP:TV (the basic WikiProject for all of us), but we've been trying to get some feedback on additions to the TV Manual of Style. It largely has to do with the inclusion of "Overview" tables at the start of the page, the order in which season lists are presented (currently, there is no concrete order), and what is considered too much info for DVDs (i.e. should we be placing every detail about the box set in the article, from each interview to the aspect ratio, or should be keep it more generalized). Please see discussion at WT:MOSTV#Updates to the MOS. Thank you.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 22:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to TV#MOS 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Avatar: The Last Airbender articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 21:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avatar: The Last Airbender articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I noticed the articles of Avatar: The Last Airbender type articles are not supported by this WikiProject. I am just wondering if they could be considered part of that project. I know Avatar: The Last Airbender is not really a true anime when considered not being created in Japan and other Asian countries but it has been sort of described as a American anime and it has been designed and inspired by anime as well. Thoughts? Jhenderson 777 18:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, check their project scope. They only want anime specifically made as anime. Shows, etc. that are simply based on Japanese/anime influences are not included. Conversely, our articles do fall under the American Animation workgroup in the Animation WikiProject. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 23:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok then. Just checking. Jhenderson 777 23:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga 

message: Greeting, I am a coordinator for WikiProject Animation. A B-Class checklist has been added to the project banner, along with the work group text, including the importance function. The B-Class checklist will include 6 point parameters to assess against the criteria. If you have any questions, please discuss at our talk page. Thank for your time. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 21:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class checklist for WikiProject Animation 

message: Portal:Animation is currently a featured portal candidate. Please feel free to leave comments. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 23:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured portal candidate: Animation 

message: Hi, members of this task force may be interestested in Talk:The Legend of Korra#RfC: How do we organize the content related to the individual books of The Legend of Korra? and the subsequent two discussions.  Sandstein  21:00, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Legend of Korra'' organization RfC 

message: This franchise seems like a candidate for inclusion on this list. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of multimedia franchises]]