Talk:Madonna (art)

message: There's an empty heading, and some rephrasing/grammar smoothing is needed. ~ Veledan | Talk | c. 23:32, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> 

message: Is there a specific reason why Madonna and Child and Madonna (art) are two separate pages? It seems to me that Madonna and Child would make a good subsection for Madonna (art). But before I put a marge tag on these pages, I would like to hear from those who kno wmore about this field. Your comments will be appreciated. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 16:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine - I can do it. Johnbod (talk) 01:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Madonna (art)]] vs [[Madonna and Child]]

message: There is a gallery of art on this page, but it is relatively small. John bod commented that the Madonna gallery on Roman Catholic Marian art was too large, and I agreed with that observation. Hence it seems to me to make sense to add some of those images to this page. The main motivation is to avoid the somewhat "less than organized" situation that persists within Wiki-commons. I will start to add more images here in a day or so unless there are good reasons for not doing so. This Madonna page has good text, but it really deserves a better gallery than what exists right now, e.g. the statues need to be separated from the paintings, etc. Then it will be a better page with both good text and images. History2007 (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: Images of the Madonna and Madonna and Child are one of the central icons....  
Images plural, of two different subjects can hardly be "one" of anything. Unless we are talking about the Holy Trinity, but we are not. Amandajm (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar!

message: thumb|120px
Are the Lady of Guadalupe images usually considered Madonna? I have not seen that done, although by the definition here, she is the central image. Any idea about the reasoning therein? By the way, does this statue qualify as a Madonna?  History2007 (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: South America

message: Once again, there is a discussion at Talk:Madonna (entertainer) that seems to affect this page. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Madonna (entertainer)

message: Not really enough coverage to warrant a separate page for the San Lucchese altarpiece. M. Caecilius (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[San Lucchese Madonna]] 

message: The usage of Madonna is up for discussion at Talk:Madonna_(entertainer)#Requested_move_8 where it is requested that the singer's article be moved to "Madonna". -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Madonna"

message: I feel that many of the painting illustrating this article are not the most representative paintings on the subject. Many great paintings are left out and for example the modern section is not showing a modern Madomma, and so on. I will change the lead picture and the modern section picture, add some to gallery - and add some more later, if no objections are raised.   Hafspajen (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrating.  

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Madonna (entertainer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 11:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Lead mentions modern artists, and some of their works are listed near the very end, but the "Modern images" section where they actually belong does not. The "Islamic view" section is misnamed (it has no content on Islamic views, only a historical story about Mohammed).  Not sure what a good name for this section is.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  06:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Modern images" section rightly covers popular images by roadsides etc. Islamic views on this and everything else are vastly affected by any relevant comments recorded by the Prophet. Johnbod (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section cleanup 

message: This Talk page could really do with archiving. I am not currently able to set this up. Would some nice editor please consider doing so? Thanks 2A01:4C8:1039:89E4:3824:FCDE:A198:8EC (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archiving? 

message: This is not my area at all so please feel free to tell me (politely) to shut up. I note that in our article European goldfinch we say in the lead  with a link from  to this article. When you get here, though, there is no mention of the goldfinch, and there's no example (that I have yet found) of a painting with one, for example Madonna del cardellino. The European goldfinch article does have a nice bit about the religious symbolism, here, but it seems a little strange for a reader to follow the link from its lead and find nothing at all here. Should this be changed and a little bit added here? I'd be interested to know what you think. Best wishes to all 2A01:4C8:1039:89E4:3824:FCDE:A198:8EC (talk) 08:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Professor Google can help here - taking you to Madonna of the Goldfinch for a start. Or the Commons category which has others. Something could be added here, but there are so many variant image types of the M+C it's not surprising we have nothing. Johnbod (talk) 14:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goldfinch 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Madonna (art) →  – WP:THE, WP:CONCISE, WP:NATURAL and WP:SMALLDETAILS. Shwcz (talk) 07:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 June 2022