Talk:Dresden Codak

message: I keep seeing people suggest suggest an article be deleted under the non notability grounds.  As the above discussion indicated to me, they were really deleting it because they found the entry un encyclopedic.  They are not the same thing.  Anyway, I vote keep.  Mathiastck 01:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, no.  I suggested the deletion because of a lack of notability.  If the best that this comic can come up with is an off mention by Gurewitch or a one line mention in a daily zeitgeist then its not notable. - hahnchen 17:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable.. like.. A ROOM WITH A MOOSE??  The comic is notable. Quiet down. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.239.195.158 (talk) 05:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable...like Snorlax?? If you see the "Wikiproject Webcomic" tag perhaps, I say perhaps, you should assume that they know what they're doing. But nooo. Crush, kill, destroy! "Wikipedia - the free lexicon that anyone can delete!" Join the fun, people! Harg 01:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

text: SO ANGRY. Deleted MISFILE now?  $#%#$%! STOP DELETING SHIT. Ohemgee 05:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability versus Enencyclopeadic 

message: Web Cartoonist's choice awards have been ruled as an adequate source of notablity.Interpretivechaos 18:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WCCA establishes Notability 

message: I don't think this should even exist as a page, but if this is going to stay surely someone needs to edit this articule, namely make it more balanced in terms of adding more to the critisms to include the mention of its 2-d characters and badly conceived story lines.FSAB (talk) 21:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And if anybody of NOTE in major media makes such a criticism, I'm sure it will be, until then, stay NPOV please.  (Also: it's spelled "Notability"... "article"... and "criticism".)68.202.85.105 (talk) 01:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notiblity?

message: *Reviewed on the podcast, The Gigcast, (#60) in October 2006
*Reviewed in the webcomic review blog Webcomicgeek in August 2006 
*Mentioned in the webcomics blog, Fleen
*Reviewed by the webcomics podcast, Digital Strips on June 20, 2007
*Reviewed by La Cueva del Lobo, La Cueva del Lobo on January 06, 2008
* Reviewed by ComixTalk on February 2008
*Interviewed on the "Blowing Bubbles" webcomic podcast by T Campbell on Broken Frontier on March 12, 2007
*Interviewed by Jayaprakash Satyamurthy for kvltblog on August 12, 2007
*Interviewed by Brian Warmoth for Wizard Magazine on August 24, 2007
*Interviewed by Xaviar Xerexes for ComixTalk on June 2008
--Dragonfiend (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anybody track down the Wizard Magazine interview, perchance? It's probably the most obviously high-profile coverage (note: this is not to say that Wizard Magazine is "better", simply that more people have heard of it outside of the general comics community. as it appears on regular newstands with fair regularity) 68.202.85.105 (talk) 01:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some possible sources 

message: This comic has never ever updated once a week, nor will it in the foreseeable future. However, pointing this out is original research, while the comic's own blatantly false claim of once a week is truthery by default, right? --213.67.23.49 (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looking at the comic's entire run there's been one episode every 26 days on average. More fairly, for the current plotline the average update interval is 22 days. So yes, 1.5-3 weeks is closer to the mark. I don't want to judge Diaz personally, but he's received some widespread criticism (not to say ridicule) for announcing a much higher tempo and then going on as before. --213.67.23.49 (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update frequency 

message: I have restructured the page to be less complicated and less subjective. Therefore, much of the previous conversation is moot. Webmaren (talk) 00:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big edit 

message: Google news and scholar searches of "aaron diaz dresden" returns two potential sources that do not appear to be in the article nor here in the talk page. Here they are in case anyone wishes to expand the article.
* Al Kratina's 2008 article Internet liberates comic book artists in canada.com mentions Diaz use of "unlimited canvas" and the comic's scientific concepts.
* Aubrey de Grey's editorial comments on Diaz's essay A Thinking Ape’s Critique of Trans-Simianism attached to this 2007 episode. Aubrey de Grey wrote that she sent the essay to Hava Samuelson for comment and briefly touched on the reactions of academics and non-academics.
-84user (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! Those sound like good sources indeed. When I get the chance, perhaps I'll go and add them a bit. 68.202.85.105 (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  News and Scholar sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dresden Codak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090310200607/http://www.ccawards.com/2008finalists.html to http://www.ccawards.com/2008finalists.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501194845/http://www.rsspect.com:80/rss/codak.xml to http://www.rsspect.com/rss/codak.xml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dresden Codak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100104015431/http://brianmpalmer.com/gurewitch.htm to http://www.brianmpalmer.com/gurewitch.htm
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5p9JLT7dk?url=http://www.ccawards.com/2007.htm to http://www.ccawards.com/2007.htm
*Added  tag to http://dresdencodak.livejournal.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified