lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Menai, New South Wales

message: Maybe a mention of the fires?--BigglesTheGreat 03:45, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fires?

message: This article seems like nothing more than an advertisement for the bourgeois real estate agents. Is there any talk on the indigineous peoples there? 222.154.65.96 02:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: 1024*768 (WinXP, Firefox) resolution, the last image overlaps the template at the bottom. Perhaps we should ditch some images. Also, why do the edit buttons all get pushed to the bottom? - Quolnok 03:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind about the overlap, I just fixed that bit. - Quolnok 03:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many images? 
Talk:Robert Paul Wolff

message: Could someone provide a citation which establishes Wolff as part of the individualist tradition? I have yet to read his work so I cannot do it myself (Assuming his work is "individualist"). In a blog post titled, "The Thought of Karl Marx Part Fourteen", he calls himself a Marxist:
"The simple truth, as true now as it was when Marx first advanced it, is that capitalism rests upon exploitation. That is why, on this blog and elsewhere, I call myself a Marxist."
Taking into account the above, along with the fact that his book is titled "In Defense of Anarchism", I'd be inclined to label him a libertarian socialist/Social Anarchist and/or libertarian Marxist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Univearth (talk • contribs) 21:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individualist anarchist 

message: Should we add? Also prominent as a Kant lecturer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.2.29 (talk) 07:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-describes as atheist on his twitter.
Talk:Lewis Gordon

message: I've begun the rather large task of trying to bridle all the information given in the article into a presentable format, but it appears to be a very rambling summary of Gordon's thought, which I wouldn't be surprised if it was written by Gordon himself or a close friend or student. Anyway, it still needs a lot of work. A.G. Pinkwater 23:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Further references would be a great addition.  CCS81 (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New World (supermarket)

message: Perhaps something could be added about New World Metro, on Lambdon Quay and inside the Train Station in Wellington?
hey can anyone put the time it opens and closes please  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.23.61 (talk) 19:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it would last long putting opening and closing times on this article - Nz26 | Talk | Contribs | Email 02:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

message: , why do you keep removing the content from the article without giving a reason? The content is valid. RoadWarrior445 (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2015
Talk:Intelligent design/Archive 15

message: A lot of the arguments for and against Intelligent Design could fit in the arguments for and against the existence of God (Existence of God) article. Maybe some of the arguments presented in this article could also be included in that article? Probably, most of the arguments presented here could be transferred over.
: The specific argument that IDC implies is the teleological argument, which is adequately covered in arguments for the existence of God.  However, IDC is really quite complex and has subtle differences as well as lings to the teleological argument, so the articles need to exist in parallel. Dunc|☺ 00:00, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existence of God
Talk:Goodwood House

message: I think this article would benefit from a picture which actually shows the house. --Dandelions 21:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Koç Holding

message: At least the History section is copied from http://www.koc.com.tr/User/tarihce_kurulus.aspx?LANGUAGE_CODE=EN --Snowdog 08:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy vio 

message: The company logo is useful for identification of primary and subsidiary companies. Mavigogun (talk) 06:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: response to image tag

message: According to sources such as this and this, Opet/Aygaz Bulgaria has been aquired by Hellenic Petroleum in Nov 2008 and has been integrated into EKO Bulgaria EAD (see this).
I did not remove Opet/Aygaz Bulgaria from the list, but added a note about the aquistion. 62.169.220.17 (talk) 07:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opet/Aygaz Bulgaria 

message: I'm just thinking that, since there aren't reliable sources for this information (I just looked), and since it's information someone could find by looking up this company's website or profile, it shouldn't be on this Wikipedia page. Greente28 (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete "Fields of activities" section?
Talk:Trefoil knot

message: The article says that this is the unique knot with three crossings, but the knot and it's mirror image are not isotopic and both have three crossings. Maybe it should say unique up to chirality?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ixionid (talk • contribs) 20:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  unique? 

message: The section Nontriviality contains this sentence:
"Mathematically, this means that a trefoil knot is not isotopic to the unknot." 
The word "isotopic" (without further qualification) is an equivalence relation on topological embeddings of one space into another.
With this meaning, all knots are isotopic, simply because a knot can be "pulled tight" so that it disappears, via an isotopy. 
This is a mistake in the article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:52D:8748:7384:FB5A (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Template talk:Primary sources

message: "This article relies too much on references to primary sources" is a wordy sentence—"This article relies excessively on references to primary sources" flows much better and falls in line with other similar templates. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: per WP:BOLD — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 4 October 2022 

message: , can you look at test  which appears to be failing? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why I added the tests. The code does not cope with both BLP and Section together — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 10:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The test now fails "correctly"!?  — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Took me a moment to remember why I did this, but it still seems valid. It is to cope with both  and  at the same time. The tests seem clean. Thanks  for the catch — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:   * Pppery * it has begun... 20:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failing test section + BLP=yes 

message: I think the wording of the template should convey the significant misuse of primary sources, as opposed to excessive. Excessive seems to imply overwhelming usage, which is not always the case even when a template might be appropriate (particularly when used for sections small enough to have used a small number of sources, and where primary sources might only be misused one or a couple of times). Perhaps it should be changed to something along the lines of "This article inappropriately relies on references to primary sources," or simply "This article relies on references to primary sources." TheGEICOgecko (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 22 November 2022 

message: Please add "Article" between "this" and "by" Lina211Follow your dreams 03:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be clear enough from the context of the message; this ought to be a "less is more" situation IMO. —Locke Cole • t • c 03:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

text: For some reason, the template did not match the documentation. Having "this" without a word following it was  grammatically awkward. I added "article" as the default, per the documentation.  – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 5 December 2022 

message: Change "secondary or tertiary sources." to "secondary or tertiary sources to this section." if parameter 1 is section. Timothytyy (talk) 13:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: if this were edited, then the sentence would read: "Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources to this section," which would use the word "section" twice and sound strange. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 16:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 17 April 2023
Talk:History of measurement/Archive 7

message: Historical weights and measures need at a minimum to be organized according to their historic developments. Any history book would look at any subject as having ancient, classical, medeival and modern forms, thats what having a history means, that you can track how things evolved.
There is no unsourced conjecture in the article, all of it is pretty mainstream history, but if there is a fact you dispute why not mention it on the discussion page and find out more about it before reducing the whole article to nonsense. As to Gilling's, who is the author of "Mathematics in the time of the Pharoah's" and probably pretty academic and dry for most tastes, you can buy his book in paperback for $9.50 from ABE books.Rktect 19:21, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: historic weights and measures
Talk:Charles Babbage Institute

message: Excerpt ... thinkLets(cc): In the area of information processing, DARPA made great strides, initially through the development of time-sharing (all modern operating systems are descendants of the Multics system, which resulted from the work started by DARPA in this area), and later through the evolution of the ARPANET (a telecommunications network and precursor to the Internet), and research in the artificial intelligence (AI) fields of speech recognition and signal processing. 
DARPA also funded the development of NLS and the Aspen Movie Map, which was probably the first hypermedia system and an important precursor of virtual reality.
From 1976-1981, DARPA's major thrusts were dominated by air, land, sea, and space technology, such as follow-on forces attack with standoff weapons and associated Command, Control, and Communications; tactical armor and anti-armor programs; infrared remote sensing for space-based surveillance; high-energy laser technology for space-based missile defense; antisubmarine warfare systems; advanced cruise missiles; advanced aircraft; and defense applications of advanced computing ...
Also see:
* CDC 1604
Note: Contact CBI's current staff to verify and validate (V&V) this article's content and to provide primary source references.
RJBurkhart 10:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS)

message: * Charles Babbage Institute (CBI)
** History of computing hardware
*** History of operating systems
** History of the internet
*** History of the graphical user interface
* Computer architecture – how computers are designed
** Computers in fiction
* Computing timeline
** Mainframe computer
*** Minicomputer
**** Microcomputer
***** Nanotechnology 
* CPU design – includes an evolutionary history of CPU architecture and design 
** History of computer hardware in communist countries
* Programming language timeline
RJBurkhart 13:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: Why was this article tagged for needed a more "world wide" viewpoint? The subject of the article is one organization that exists in Minnesota. What larger international viewpoint is there? MK2 22:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe they thought, given Babbage's nationality, that "center" should be spelled "centre"?  I agree, this tag should be justified or removed. Robert K S 14:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Wide View? 

message: I am removing the memetics category from this article since you learn no more about the article's contents from the category and v.v. Since so many things may be memes we should try to keep the category closely defined in order to remain useful. Hope you're okay with that. The link to meme would be enough I suggest. Facius 11:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing memetics category
Talk:The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins

message: Also, doesn't it look like  "Say Shhh..." the first song on Minnesota public radio? Its confusing, and if it is actually true, why is it on this entry?
----
One  dancer looks like Adele Yoshioka - one of Laugh-in's Burbank Beauties. - Sparky 06:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's interesting that Nimoy would perform the song on Malibu U a year before it was actually released (though I guess such delays aren't unheard of). Can anyone confirm that the record was actually released in 1968 and not 1967 to correspond with the televised version? Being uncomfortably familiar with the song, it's obvious the TV and record versions are the same recording (although the Malibu U one is edited down somewhat). 23skidoo 03:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Performed before release?

message: Doesn't look like a beach to me.  Looks more like the Vasquez Rocks park.Sir Rhosis (talk) 12:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Performed on a beach

message: Apparently Erin Gray was one of the dancers in this "video," having worked on Malibu U. I'm not sure where this has been confirmed (IMDB indeed lists her as "Dancer" in several episodes, #2 included, which is the episode in which The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins was performed) but if anyone finds a reference for that, it seems notable enough to go in the article. If IMDB is a reliable enough source I can add it into the article. I've never edited a Wiki page in my life though so I'll err on the side of caution and hopefully someone else will confirm it and add it. 70.162.128.157 (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erin Gray
Talk:Shazna

message: "but few have managed to do it as convincingly as he has, except for Mana"
Whatever. :/
:If it is just someone's opinion, remove it. If someone puts it back, remove it again, demanding a source. Personal opinions are not allowed on Wikipedia. -- Goodraise (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  whatever, this is just someone's opinion 
Talk:G4 Media (TV company)

message: The fate of G4 Media with the shutdown of G4's network is unknown. The article should not speculate on what might happen to G4 Media or how its owners may (or may not) choose to wrap it up. 75.17.124.173 (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final status 
Talk:Asteroid impact avoidance

message: The Asteroid impact prediction article has just moved from Draft to the main article space. Reviewers suggested that I should add some of the text from the Asteroid impact prediction article to this one (I have linked the Asteroid impact prediction article to this one already). Looking at the avoidance article it seems that it already contains some text on impact prediction, but is not currently identified as such. I.e. the avoidance article does not currently differentiate between the two separate stages of 1. predicting an impact, followed by 2. taking action to prevent the impact from happening.
I can see from comments in the avoidance article that there are some issues with the existing prediction text in that it is now quite out of date. Conveniently the new prediction article is lacking information on the history of impact prediction and could do with some of the text currently in the avoidance article. Can I suggest that we separate out the prediction text in the avoidance article to make it clear it is about prediction (adding a main article link), and then the bulk of the avoidance article can focus on the actual avoidance, which is a separate topic? Correspondingly an "Aftermath" section can be added to the prediction article detailing the options in the event of a predicted impact, which depending on the severity will include avoidance. Rafflesgluft (talk) 14:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a couple of months, and no objections or comments during that time, so I soon plan to start 1. copying the asteroid impact prediction text into the Asteroid impact prediction article, and then 2. removing it from this article, with an ultimate aim to leave this article focused on impact avoidance and the prediction article on prediction. Any last minute comments or objections, please shout up, otherwise I will go ahead under the assumption any interested parties are in agreement. Thanks Rafflesgluft (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asteroid impact prediction 

message: Anything about 2019 PDC, which was part of a NASA simulation? --136.8.33.70 (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's just the latest of a biennial tabletop simulation series by IAA with minor NASA support, of which Talk:2013 PDC-E seems to be the first.  So, one article for the whole series ought to be enough. Jim.henderson (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 PDC 

message: — Assignment last updated by Landon 7 (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science
Talk:Musa Hitam

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from:  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bowness, Calgary

message: I'm unaware of any social issues in Bowness, I live here. I'm not sure where this image comes from...
* Like it or not, Bowness definitely has this reputation. Talk to any Calgarian. I have been aware of this reputation for as long as I can remember. In fact, at one point, I was debating moving there, and a police officer informed me that it would be a bad idea. HOWEVER, just because it has this reputation DOES NOT mean it's deserved. It is a fact that there is a higher occurrance of drug problems and other petty crime in PARTS of Bowness. Bowness High School also has a bad reputation for being "rough around the edges". I do not subscribe to all of these beliefs myself. Bowness is a far more diverse community than most, and I think that is a good thing. Unfortunately, diversity (all kinds) often leads to social tension in our society. Crime stats from the CPS are telling when you compare them to communities with similar populations. Bowness's crime rate is within the top 7 of Calgary's neighbourhoods (out of over 100) exceeded only by some downtown and NE neighbourhoods. Population stats by neighbourhood can be found here . - Tyson2k 07:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Social Issues

message: A split of this article has been proposed into separate articles for the current neighbourhood (Bowness, Calgary) and the former town (Bowness, Alberta). Instead of commenting below, please review and submit your comments at this discussion thread. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bowness, Calgary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.calgary.ca/DocGallery/bu/planning/pdf/heritage/heritage_policies_in_arps.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101002014119/http://www.hextallplace.com:80/project.html to http://www.hextallplace.com/project.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110110094127/http://mybowness.wordpress.com:80/tag/lions-stampede-breakfast/ to http://mybowness.wordpress.com/tag/lions-stampede-breakfast/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718103130/http://mybowness.wordpress.com/?s=harvest+fair to http://mybowness.wordpress.com/?s=harvest+fair
*Added external link for our COVID initiative, working from home in bowness https://techespresso.ca/computer-repair-calgary.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.78.250.165 (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Tropical Storm Odette (2003)

message: It is a candidate for a merged candidate. It is a little short... not too much outside of the storm history. Feel free to debate here. Hurricanehink 23:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless the impact section can be expanded, it should be merged. Jdorje 02:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'm sharpening my axe... -- Hurricane Eric archive -- my dropsonde 03:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't sharpen it too much; your beloved Hurricane Faith is next (it should come before Alex I think)! Jdorje 05:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Besides this image which you are addressing, considering the way you have addressed this issue the fact that i may be unavailable for 1 or 2 weeks I have decided that delaying the articles promotion because of this would not be acceptable.  
Congratulations to all who edited this article on its promotion to GA Gnangarra 13:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. I'll post their response here when I get it. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Promotion

message: Longer storm history. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 01:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo2

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have added an article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tropical Storm Sebastien (1995) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 04:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress