lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Savitribai Phule

message: today i visited this page, found very supportive information. thanks a lot  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.174.172 (talk) 07:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is poorly sourced in genera.  It mentions different adopted children in different sections.  Please clarify.Gaff (talk) 17:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adopted children?  Poorly sourced article. 

message: the birth place (naigoan) takes user to a diffrent naigoan village page Pharandemahesh (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. DRAGON BOOSTER  ★ 08:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2017 

message: and wear simple red sarees and had to lead a very austere life with little joy.[6]  corrected:and wear simple white sarees and had to lead a very austere life with little joy. Please change the word in "red" in the above sentence as indian widows wear white sarees .The colour red signifies auspiciousness in marriage in india.--Ms.bhuddimaan (talk) 15:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2017 

message: There is so much literature available on Savitribai Phule and Jyotiba Phule. So many biographies written by Western and Indian academicians in English and in Marathi. Yet we are using articles from newspapers like "financial express" , "the Hindu", "India today", etc.,  written by uneducated/biased "journalists" who distort facts based on their agenda. Instead of using high quality academic sources , we are using a 23 year old college dropout like Divya Kandukuri.
https://www.news18.com/news/india/how-a-22-year-old-is-helping-the-marginalised-fight-their-mental-health-battles-1917403.html Not making an "argumentum ad hominem" on Kandukuri but there is so much material available on the Phule family that using news articles for Phule's life is like using news articles to write about Shivaji's life. Acharya63 (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  low quality  sources 

message: Idk 2405:204:94AE:F849:0:0:A48:98B0 (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idk 

message: Savitri bai Phule 2409:4042:899:7E02:DBB2:4047:8813:4524 (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  english 

message: Savithri Bai Phule information about english more more information 2409:4071:D09:D644:35C:F7E4:E06C:45DB (talk) 10:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social 

message: Kdkdjdkdk 103.85.102.233 (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savitri bai phule 

message: Please start this program.🙏
 Tv chya madhyamatun ghara gharat pochnarya savitrijyotibanchya vicharancha vichar karava. Vinanti karto serial lavkarat lavkar chalu  hoil yacha vichar karava. 103.134.5.127 (talk) 05:11, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Savitrijyoti  Tv serial
Talk:Demographics of Chile

message: it says "Chile population pyramid in 2024 96% European (86% full European "White" and 10% partial European "Mestizo"), 4% Others" i am not sure what the author meant by this, but we can agree the labeling of Chileans as "full european white" and "european mestizo" with the given numbers are not correct and this can be seen on the same page later. even the 4% others is nonsensical when analyzing Chilean demographics. "Genetics studies fluctuate between 57,8% and 67.9% European; between 32.1% and 44.3% Amerindian; and 2.5%—6.3% African ancestry percentages. A genetic study by the University of Chile found that the average Chilean's genetic makeup consists of 64% Caucasian and 35% Amerindian ancestry. In a 2014 study of Chilean soldiers stationed in Arica, researchers found that the average self-identifying white person (37.9%) was genetically only 54% European" same page later. CreeperFIN (talk) 21:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description under population pyramid picture. 

message: 1.75 estimated in sidebar using cia world factbook as source whereas it is estimated to be 1.2 using the source of the ministry of statistics. this calls into question all of the infobox, should bring all of the infobox inline using official statistics. DuxLoKi (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive diffrence between infobox estimated TFR and Table estimated TFR
Talk:Butterfly sex position

message: Comment: Best position IMO, but Wiki is NPOV, so I won't go there. Anyway, this article need a couple of POV fixes. I'm also going to remove the stub.  Deckiller 20:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I have a reference (Rogiere, Jean, "The Little Book of Sex". Ulysses Press. 2001. ISBN 1569753059) that calls a completely different position by this name.  Can anyone provide a counter-reference that uses this name for this position?  If not, I will eventually replace this page's content with the citable description. --Strait 03:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Ebbw Valley Railway

message: This plan has a GFDL tag attached to it, but its summary says "Property of Capita Symonds as part of Ebbw Valley Railway Scheme Design". How are these two compatible? 86.135.7.240 00:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They a probably not compatible.Trish pt7 (talk) (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schematic Route Plan copyright? 

message: The article would look better and be less confusing if it displayed only one schematic diagram of the route plan. Does anyone have a preference as to which one should be used? Daicaregos (talk) 10:22, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schematic diagram 

message: Should the two EVR Route Diagram Templates be combined into one? There are hardly any differences between them. Nathan A RF (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree.  is redundant and can be removed. Lamberhurst (talk) 17:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combine RDTs 
Wikipedia talk:Partial revert

message: There was no consensus to blank the page to a redirect. It would be helpful if those that edited the page to a redirect would actually work together with everybody for something that would work. — Dzonatas 20:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page isn't needed. Someone slightly bolder than me should delete it... William M. Connolley 20:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Waterfowl hunting

message: I am in the process of rewriting the article to incorporate sources, remove unsourced or non-encyclopedic material, and to provide more on the history of hunting. I have already moved the article from duck hunting to expand its scope. Please feel free to help if you have sources to contribute; more pics would be welcome. Wachholder0 17:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 rewrite

message: The wildfowling article seems to be a British view of waterfowl hunting. Merging would help correct the lack of world-view in both articles and be less confusing. Wachholder0 00:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Wildfowling]] with/into this article

message: There is a confusing sentence discussing shotguns which I am not sure how to fix.  The sentence currently reads:
:In the days of market hunting, four (10) gauge, six (12) gauge, eight (20) gauge and (28) gauge shotguns were used in hunting. The four and six gauge were mounted to small boats. 
The numbers in parentheses don't make sense.  The numbers noted (10, 12, 20, 28) are also shotgun gauges, but aren't equivalent to 4, 6, 8 gauge.  I'm not sure what is being meant; it's not a clarification.  Maybe someone with the correct subject matter expertise can clarify or remove as appropriate. --Kadin2048 (talk) 03:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence re shotguns 

message: According to the British Association for Shooting and Conservation "Wildfowling is the pursuit of ducks, geese and  waders on the foreshore with a shot gun, and  this also extends to punt guns." While foreshore is defined as "the “area between the low water and high water marks of an ordinary spring tide.” Therefore "Wildfowling" is a special case (locally limited) of "Waterfowl hunting" and not synonymous as the introduction and the "Wildfowling in the UK" section suggest. I'm no native English speaker, so please correct me if I got that wrong. --Tilon3 (talk) 09:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wildfowling" isn't synonymous with "Waterfowl hunting", it's a special case 

message: — Assignment last updated by Klohnlane25 (talk) 14:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Field Ecology and Conservation Technology

message: — Assignment last updated by Jwerry98 (talk) 15:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: COMP II
Talk:Robert Zajonc

message: I propose that this article also mentions the confluence theory of Zajonc and Markus (1975). This could be the basis of a wiki-link between this article and that on  birth order, an article which could do with some amendment, updating and editing. A reciprocal wiki-link, if this information were added, would solve some of the concerns I have about the article on birth order. ACEO 20:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the more likely they would be to recognise the object and must form their own attitude about the stimulus by thinking about it : this is a very confused sentence. Could someone clarify this ? --Anne97432 15:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry, obscure sentence 

message: I have heard that Zajonc is pronounced "zience."  Can someone confirm that and add it to the article?
Pring (talk) 21:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of the name 

message: Is a cute poem from a child (I hope) really appropriate as a tag for an encyclopedia entry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christiancrandall (talk • contribs) 14:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandaughter's note
Talk:Ambalika

message: PLEASE REFER THE WORDS IN QUOTES IN THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE.IT WOULD BE BETTER TO WRITE 'ABDUCTED' RATHER THAN 'TAKEN BY FORCE' ( WHICH MIGHT GIVE A DIFFERENT MEANING, IN NORMAL USAGE)
Along with her sisters Amba and Ambika, she was taken by force by Bhishma from their Swayamvara, the latter having challenged and defeated the assembled royalty. He presented them to Satyavati for marriage to Vichitravirya.
PARABRAHMA0 (talk) 01:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUGGESTION FOR CORRECTION : 'SHE WAS TAKEN BY FORCE' 
Talk:Lululemon

message: Although this was deprodded and reprodded, I don't think it needs sent to AfD.  If you check out the talk page of the editor who deprodded it, the removal was not related to the article, but part of a personal dispute.  But if someone thinks it ought to be sent to AfD instead, I can see that position as well. NickelShoe 20:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: I don't see why this article needs to be removed. It has ligitimate information and poses no harm.
:Discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lulu Lemon. But you ought to read the guidelines at WP:CORP first, to understand a little more where others are coming from. NickelShoe 04:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do Not Remove
Talk:Damayanti

message: This article is at least a start-class. A stub implies that there is hardly any info about her. This page summarizes her part in the Mahabharata. (Ghostexorcist 20:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Class
Template talk:Campaignbox Sully's Expedition Against the Sioux in Dakota Territory

message: Are there any other battles in this "campaign"?  If not, this campaignbox should be deleted or absorbed into another campaignbox, since one battle does not constitute a campaign. Roy Al Blue 20:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually listed that way in Civil War Battle Summaries by Campaign by the CWSAC. Mojoworker (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other battles? 

message: Since this template has been nominated for deletion, I'll expand on some of the rational for its existence. A little history on the origins of these Campaign templates is in order.  They originally all came from following this list from the Civil War Sites Advisory Committee at the National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program, and as you can see, there are many on the list that have only one battle. It may be counter–intuitive, but a campaignbox with just one battle in it actually imparts value. It's important to understand what a Military campaign is and is not. It is not merely a list of battles. To over simplify, a campaign is strategic while a battle is tactical. A campaign can cover thousands of miles with zero, one, or few battles fought. It could be argued that the most successful campaign would achieve its goals with not a single battle fought and zero casualties on either side – but with the strategic aims of its planner fulfilled. These campaign lists were developed as they were for a reason, by professional historians, and changing them to be grouped, for example, geographically with other battles that are part of a different campaign, loses context and conflates campaigns which may have been carried out in different years and planned by different commanders. And having a campaignbox, even one with only one battle, also gives a  consistent appearance on every battle article that is part of the WP:MILHIST project. I believe that's part of the WP:MILHIST style guide, but I'm not 100% certain. A campaignbox with one battle still imparts information of the CWSAC campaign name (for example Template:Campaignbox Jackson's Operations Against the B&O Railroad) and also gives a starting point for an article on the campaign itself as in Streight's Raid and for adding minor battles and skirmishes not rated by the CWSAC such as Template:Campaignbox Mine Run Campaign where the minor engagement Battle of Charlestown was added at some point by an editor to join the CWSAC rated Battle of Mine Run. Mojoworker (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this Campaignbox has only one battle
Talk:Boston Marriage (play)

message: The following review was added 23 Feb. 06. 
I found the play an absolute dud in its Geffen Playhouse performance. It's a hoax, displaying no physical intimacy and very little emotional intimacy between the women. Although the acting was excellent, the script was abysmal. Part of the problem may have been the atrocious acoustics of the renovated Geffen Playhouse in Westwod CA. Only one minute of memorable dialogue occurred -- when Anna advised her maid to have her partner scrape the debris off her back after love-making in the park, and the maid replied they'd be doing it against a tree, as the view is much better that way. -- Richard Coanda, Ph. D., 23 Feb. 2006
I removed it from the main article. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 20:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed review
Talk:Nathan M. Newmark

message: Copied from User talk:Howcheng:
:I don't know that it's a copyvio.  But if you go to Wikipedia:Spotting possible copyright violations, this article meets 4 of the 5 warning criteria.  It was basically put up at once (more or less), is unwikified, has kind of "catchy" section headings that are not standard wikipedia format, and the tone of the whole piece is more like a tribute than an encyclopedia.  Also, if they'd done any basic research on him, rather than copy-and-paste, they'd know he's dead and would include his date of death.  I'm sorry I haven't had more time to devote to it, but I will.  I just did a quick google search and turned up this page  which is pretty darn close.  Actually, this page  is even closer.  The rest of the source article seems to be password protected.  But I think if you take a look at these two, you'll agree they've been copied with minimal changes.  Bruxism 00:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was a second article about this person, which I have now made into a redirect.  I will paste it all below, so that nothing is lost. I'll incorporate the ref to the NAE tribute, and change the lead "engineer" link to "structural engineering", but haven't spotted anything else new on a quick glimpse through it. I was led to this by Wikipedia:Suggestions for name disambiguation PamD (talk) 09:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicate article at [[Nathan Mortimore Newmark]]
Talk:Bruce Hampton

message: I stumbled across some references to Hampton being involved briefly with professional wrestling before becoming a musician, and that this influenced his proclivity for performance art, a la Andy Kaufman. I would be bold and add it, but there wasn't enough context to tell if this was real or just some weird in-joke. Anybody know about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TravelingCat (talk • contribs) 06:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional wrestling? 

message: Nobody: Free Bird Cafe. Bruce the "Shark" doesn't smoke? Is He under water? Aquarius, Cherokee, North Florida Refugees. Sling Blade Poetry. Catskill mountains of fountains, Dundee dares the air. William Blake and poetry, always mine the share, many moons, fair to parting the waters? Berlin. Top Gun </\> BC Augustus75.201.214.15 (talk) 06:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tobacco 

message: The concern about lack of encyclopedic tone is about the first paragraph of the "Career" section. If it can't be directly sourced, the information about sales (and yoga) should probably just be removed. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of encyclopedic tone 

message: This article states his death as May 1 but on Deaths in 2017 it states he died on the 2nd. Which one is right? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death Date
Talk:Anna Le Moine

message: How come the official credits (tv) and the official website (for Turin 2006) are spelling her name as Svaerd? Granted it's the same phonetic "end result", but I'm still wondering.  Which one is right?  And this confusion could be acknowledged in the article.  Regards, Redux 21:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They avoid diacritics for all names on the official website and on TV. If you read the name on her back however, you will see Svärd. Same goes for all players with funny slashes dots and circles in their names. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see.  Thanks for the clarification.  Indeed, when I think back, her jersey did say Svärd, I guess I didn't put two and two together.  This "discrepancy" could be worth mentioning in the article, I'm thinking.  Regards, Redux 21:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A redirect will be enough. --Voyager 15:54, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: http://www.sok.se/5.e9927a1083291bc8180007070.html
seems to say that she is married and changed her surname.
Since my Swedish is rather rudimentary, someone else should confirm
that "fd." really means what I think it means. :^)
Furthermore
http://www.worldcurling.org/teams-for-vancouver-2010
lists one "Anna La Moine",
and nothing more came up from googling.
Anyway, I'll leave it to more experienced 'pedians
to handle such things here properly.
89.50.4.102 (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage and name change? 
Talk:History of Barbados

message: independence in the Caribbean 63.143.124.7 (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social studies
Talk:Clive Walker (footballer, born 1957)

message: I've just seen all this written exactly on: https://www.skypoker.com/secure/poker/sky_lobby?action=show_static&page=pkrnews_open
Only my change to the box where he played for Cheltenham is original, as is the statement of him being Cheltenham's oldest player. Dave (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And here: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Clive-Walker Dave (talk) 18:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation?

message: A reference is here: http://www.robinsnestforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=550&sid=1f7c5cc18f58304acd9cf7545c3d7b11 Dave (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:AC Schnitzer

message: AC Schnitzer still is related to Schnitzer Motorsport, no matter what the actual ownership structure is. Removing the link is close to vandalism! --Matthead 21:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilhelm Röpke

message: Röpke contributed few to the school of Ordoliberalism (though he is indeed sometimes associated with it). Ordoliberalism was developed by Walter Eucken, Franz Böhm and Hans Großmann-Doerth. The Ordoliberalism article is wrong there (According to the German version of the Ordoliberalism article). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.248.122.36 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 23 February 2006.
From my reading, Röpke was strongly against socialism in all its forms, including National Socialism, and a strong supporter of free markets.
"He defended the free market from socialist cultural critics by pointing out that social crises and cultural decline are not the product of the free society; one needs to look to state control, political centralization, welfare, and inflation as a primary source of social decay."
See http://mises.org/about/3241.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.94.105.46 (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a student Röpke may have been a follower of the Austrian School. But since the beginning of his career he formed the school of Soziologischer Liberalismus which is a sociological form of Ordoliberalism. see Razeen Sally, Classical Liberalism and International Economic Order, Routledge, 2002, , p. 106, Wilga Föste, Grundwerte in der Ordnungskonzeption der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, 2006, , p. 147, Nils Goldschmidt, Michael Wohlgemuth, Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökonomik, Mohr Siebeck, 2008, Tübingen, , p. 12, Ralf Ptak, Vom Ordoliberalismus zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft: Stationen des Neoliberalismus in Deutschland, Vs Verlag, 1. Auflage, , p. 24, Hans-Rudolf Peters, Wirtschaftspolitik, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2000, , p. 150. No one calls him an Austrian School economist since there are a lot of differences between Soziologischer Liberalismus and austrian school. --Pass3456 (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Some more sources . --Pass3456 (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Ordoliberalism 

message: 'Röpke . . . is credited with contributing the intellectual backbone of the now infamous German Economic "Miracle".[7]' 
The phrase 'now infamous' is an authorial intrusion and comment that 1) evidences the author's bias and 2) is unnecessary. Suggest that it be deleted. Antares.press (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 --Pass3456 (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Tanks of the interwar period

message: What is the British light tank Tetrarch tank doing here? It was not produced until the war had already started. DMorpheus2 (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Tetrarch?