Talk:Hyperprolactinaemia

message: "Physiological causes (i.e. as result of normal body functioning): pregnancy, breastfeeding, stress, sleep."
Too much sleep? Too little sleep?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.182.231 (talk) 07:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sleep? 

message: I found the paragraph on Minoxidil to be ill-placed, I believe that it is too prominent and gives reader an exaggerated impression of danger. I don't necessarily thinks that it should be removed but definitely be relocated to a less prominent location. The work cited is still very preliminary, and Minoxidil is a drug which is commonly used and there is not reason to freak out its users.--Bastilleday uky (talk) 17:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Minoxidil

message: My wife's blood work reported her prolactin level in mg/ml.  If someone could say how this relates to the mIU/L used here, I would appreciate it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.240.244.198 (talk) 01:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  units? 

message: Sollip Kim, and Young-Min Park, conclude the following in an article in Plos One, published 2 Dec. 2013: "These findings suggest that SSRI therapy can induce hyperprolactinemia in patients with MDD." 
Kim S, Park Y-M (2013) Serum Prolactin and Macroprolactin Levels among Outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder Following the Administration of Selective Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. PLoS ONE 8(12): e82749. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082749  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pchprudon (talk • contribs) 11:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSRI's and prolactine level 

message: Should there be a statement on whether hyperprolactinaemia can occur in the presence of adequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation? E. Nguyen, UCSF Pharm.D. 23 (talk) 14:32, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Normal processes 

message: Some improvements our group intend on making for this article include fixing language and grammar, adding more citations/secondary sources, as well as implement aforementioned suggestions on the talk page. E. Nguyen, Future UCSF Pharm.D (talk) 21:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2021 Group Hyperprolactinaemia Proposed Edits 

message: 1. The group's edits did substantially improve the article according to the guiding framework. The group added useful information to make the article more complete. The introduction of the topic was easy to follow and gave a nice overview about the topic. Difficult phrases or words in the article were linked which was very useful for easier access of looking them up. This is very helpful when reading wikipedia articles. A suggestion would be in the Signs and Symptoms section (for women) to make it easier to read and understand. This is a complex topic and the average person might not understand all the medical terminology used without looking up many of the words. The submission does reflect a neutral point of view and did not take a side. In the article the word patient was used a few times, changing the word patients to people would help improve the neutrality of the article. The group has achieved its overall goal of improving the article by adding important information with reliable sources to back them. A couple of the references used were from clinical studies however these might have been used as there might not be many systematic reviews or other review journal to defend the topic. N.Bahman (talk) 05:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2021 Peer Review 

message: 1) ESabour reviewed all citations for correct format according to Manual of Style. 6 citations were observed that needed edits, so appropriate dates were placed (only year and not month, date, and year). ESabour (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Editing