Talk:Coingate scandal

message: The articles in the Toledo Blade are "revealed" information so are pretty confusing, chronologically-speaking and the information is pretty time consuming to add and keep the flow of the article. Keep Noe's fundraising scandal separate for now--that looks like it might even warrant another page. When writing, try to remember the page is describing the facts of what happend, not revealing it like a newspaper would. I try to write it like little mini-stories in chronological order, none of this "it was revelead in..." I find it makes it much easier to read (though much harder to write). --Ben 20:32, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding the article style notes

message: As the article itself states "coingate" is a nickname for a scandal, and therefor not appropriately formal for an encyclopedia.  If anyone supports or opposes moving the article to a more formal article name, please respond within the next 2-3 days. i kan reed 02:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia standard naming policy is to have articles be at the most common reasonable name for the article, not necessarily the most "formal" name. Thus Sonny Bono is at "Sonny Bono", not "Salvatore Phillip 'Sonny' Bono", for example. Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions: Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. --User At Work 22:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks, I think that's good reason to leave it where it is. i kan reed 23:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here's another vote for leaving it as is.   John Broughton  |  Talk 17:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

text:  Here's yet another vote for leaving it here. TVGeek 21:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: possibly moving the article

message: The image :Image:Thomas W Noe.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Thomas W Noe.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Coingate scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050403/NEWS24/504030349
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061113/BREAKINGNEWS/311130003
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified