lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Ontario Secondary Highways

message: Alright. I think i know what would rule... if this template had the ability to show the road shield of the article it's on....example: it's on Highway 516..at the bottom, it would show Highway 516's shield instead of "Highway 502".  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 03:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is certainly possible, but the appropriate shield would already show up in the article anyway. –Pomte 02:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customize
Talk:Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit

message: As the reviewing admin., I say to put in some references from major newspapers, and it should be enough. Probably the article could take some additional expansion on the basis of the material you will find there. But see also WP:COI and WP:BFAQ.
And follow up with developments. DGG (talk) 04:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was a stub article called Super SIV which I have changed to a redirect to here and borrowed the links from.  I also moved the sentence about when this was abandoned into here. QU4N71FY (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged supersiv into this
Talk:103 Search and Rescue Squadron

message: Not so much grammar problems but a promotional type tone. Blnguyen  (vote in the photo straw poll) 02:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria 4 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Pharyngeal slit

message: Can someone site sources to verify the statement, "lending weight to the theory of common ancestry." [User:Reassembler|Reassembler]] 05:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Common ancestry citation

message: A photograph or diagram would be helpful in illustrating this.Trickkelly 05:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Source number 3 is cited incompletely and could provide more information. Here is an example of a more complete citation:
Jam7887 (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete citation
Talk:SIP Phone

message: Nice work! I just had to deleted two paragraphs. Here are the reasons:
#The par. "manufacturers" was simply dangerous, it will attract advertising spammers and so cause a lot of cleanup activity and it is doomed to be incomplete.
#The par. "Where it is used" was simply wrong and again, it will attract advertising spammers who try to tell us their phone is ubiquious.
--Kgfleischmann 04:07, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Salt Lake City Police Department

message: Hi folks, I am the main contributor to this article. I do this by way of assignment from the Director of the Communications and Media Relations Unit in the department, so it is my job to do this!!! I am trying to work through those places that are "written like an advertisement". It would be awesome if someone would let me know exactly what portions they believe fit this description, rather than such a broad criticism. Happy to fix stuff and make things better!!! I was working on the article earlier and some portions, such as on our Explorer post and two pocites disappeared without me attempting to do so. Can I get this content back? The images were of Chief Brown and the explorers. Many thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Outrider11 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  major issues 

message: Looks like we'll need some content creators to write up a Recent Events section unless something big happens tomorrow and this is forgotten. L3X1 (distænt write) 21:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent events
Talk:Daniel E. Bosley

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Just Fine

message: I am not a native english speaker, I wanted to find how would not be the  same to say  "We will be fine", and "We will be just fine"
I am sure many people will appreciate a little article on the meaning of "Just Fine"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orcodrilo (talk • contribs) 16:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Fine: as an expression.
Talk:Alexander Anderson (Royal Marines officer)

message: There is now (January 2023) a full pyramid of cannon balls.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.80.118 (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration
Talk:Museum Rudana

message: The article of Museum Rudana is written to provide infornation of the lists of Art Museums, so why can't it be categorized as the Art Museums and Galleries ?
Noniq21 04:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlierer unanswered comment
Talk:Viva Records (Philippines)

message: In my opinion this article should tell more about the actual record label instead of telling about the various releases by the artists. Monni (talk) 19:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the article 

message: I think VIVA record's PPOP label should also be mentioned in the article.Max Light 10:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPOP Label
Talk:Kugruk River

message: The phrase "It is the largest tributary of the Kuzitrin River."  is wrong.
In fact it has its mouth in the Kugruk Lagoon. The above sentence probably refers to Kougarok River (see). --Mario1952 (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tributary of the Kuzitrin River?
Talk:Nippon Sharyo

message: Nippon-Sharyo → Nippon Sharyo — According to the company's own website, the official English name for this company is "Nippon Sharyo, Ltd.", abbreviated to "Nippon Sharyo" in normal usage. The reason for using a hyphen in this article's name is unclear, and most Wiki links point to "Nippon Sharyo". I suggest that the article be moved to "Nippon Sharyo". —DAJF 04:40, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this back to its original title (Nippon Sharyo) - it was the victim of a cut-and-paste move last December. Dekimasuよ! 05:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for sorting out the mess. --DAJF 06:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I just visite a trainstation in Jordanië. There was a train with a Nippon Sharyo sign dated 1850.(I have a picture). Is the date onwikipedia not right? Hovenman (talk) 06:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date
Talk:Teuge Airfield

message: As I noted in the Dutch Wikipedia version of this article, runway 09/27 has been renamed to 08/26, but I couldn't find the AIP to go with this, so perhaps someone with access to the proper sources should make this change. --IByte (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runway 09/27 renamed to 08/26
Talk:Robert Durward

message: *The original version of this article incorporated text from the article Robert Durward at Sourcewatch. -- But|seriously|folks  04:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: I have incorporated information regarding Robert Durward from the Scientific Alliance and New Party articles and removed some duplication. Dennett p 06:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information collated from other articles
Talk:National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska

message: There seems to be nothing about the geology of the area, particularly of the petroleum geology.  That would seem to be relevant to a Petroleum Reserve.  -- SEWilco (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Geology

message: There are no inline citations in this section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.209.181.185 (talk) 17:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecological importance

message: There are two errors with this map:
* Colville Special Area is labeled twice. The red area should be called Kasegaluk Lagoon Special Area
* the source link is no longer valid (check it: the resulting pdf shows completely different "planning areas"). I suggest the following link (or equivalent): http://northern.org/media-library/maps/arctic/western-arctic-npr-a-maps/npraSpecialAreasWEBlg.JPG/view
Calling the author of the map used on the page: @Jytdog
Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 10:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Special areas in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska

message: — Assignment last updated by Juniper37 (talk) 18:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Geographies of Energy and Sustainability

message: Here is an overview of edits I plan to make:
- Add more to the ecological importance section because it feels short
- Add some citations for information that is not cited
- Add a new section titles "drilling controversy" to address the debates from local communitites about the harm of drilling as well as the economic importance. This will also introduce the Willow Project
- Add a sentence to the lead addressing my changes Editor Meg (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edits: Wiki Education assignment: Geographies of Energy and Sustainability
Talk:Mitchell Olson

message: This article was deleted on grounds of non-notability. Is he notable now? Or will there be an AfD? (Having no experience in the matter of deleting articles I wouldn't know). -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 05:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean someone created a Mithcell Olson article prior and it was deleted? Nightscream 17:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep.  But I personally don't mind. I didn't see the season, so I don't know if he was notable (but the AfD seemed to think not). It seems to be well written :) -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 21:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. :-) Nightscream 22:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Mainly Mozart Festival

message: Post first draft of the Mainly Mozart article. Images and more data to follow soon. Digitalmind 05:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Is there a relationship between Mainly Mozart and Mostly Mozart?  DavidRF 03:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to [[Mostly Mozart]]? 
Talk:Snarki

message: I need some real help here.
This town is so small, I can't find a website, or a crest.  Ultimately, I would like to populate: Etymology, History, Feudal period, Modern history, Main sights, Prominent residents, Nobel laureates, Education, Economy and transport, Major corporations, Government and politics, Boroughs, Municipal politics, Professional sports, Men's sports, Women's sports, Twin towns & Partnerships, References, Footnotes, etc. Imlookingnow 05:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Category talk:People from Brisbane

message: For starters they didn't live in Brisbane.  When they emigrated to Australia they were living in Redcliffe City which is not part of Brisbane.  None of them were born in Australia they just lived there for a while.  I think it is far from correct to include the Gibb brothers in a list of people 'from' brisbane.194.46.243.135 (talk) 14:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bee Gees from Brisbane?
Talk:The Press

message: If you live in my city you will know that The Christchurch Press is a conservative paper. Everyday there is a front page headline attacking the centre-left government while praising the opposition. This isn't my opinion but if I have to blog this including some of the headlines and then cite it I will. Bactoid 05:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like publishing this sort of article (without asking other scientists their opinion) is definitely very right wing! Don't know how to 'prove' it for wikipedia http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/2669207/Climate-change-down-to-nature 129.215.25.154 (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The last paragraph of the building's official heritage register entry backs up that the Press is a conservative newspaper. Schwede66 19:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Conservative Debate 

message: Should it specify some years instead of just saying "today"? Seems like it will date itself pretty easily if it isn't changed. VioletVines (talk) 07:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today section title 

message: Cellarius (name) redirects to Cellarius (disambiguation), for the usage as  pseudonym by Samuel Butler (novelist) in his letters to the editor is ambiguous. --Pawyilee (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I share your concern, and for that reason, I once unlinked the term. Somebody else put the link back. I shall remove it again. Schwede66 17:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I greatly fear you don't share my concern, which is that readers of the article get a chance to see the list of Cellariuses from which Butler chose his pseudonym, and that bots know the link is intended. Please put it back again so (q.v.) makes sense. --Pawyilee (talk) 07:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely misunderstood you. Sorry. Schwede66 08:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for putting it back. I'm sorry my attempt to disambiguate turned out to be ambiguous! I believe Butler was honoring Christoph Cellarius, but with the link restored, readers are free to take their pick. --Pawyilee (talk) 13:07, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cellarius (name) 

message: E. B. (Binney) Lock was editor after A. R. Cant. Perhaps someone in Christchurch could look for him in the phone book and ask for the details.Redactor33 (talk) 02:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors
Talk:Nissan Van C22

message: I have an old Urvan as a farm vehicle, though we have had it since new back in the 1980s. The exterior is silver with a mostly purple/blue decal/pinstripe running the length of the body. It seats nine (in 3 rows of 3), and has the original tan fabric interior.  It looks nothing like any of the Nissan Caravans featured in the Nissan Caravan article.
When we bought it the dealership was changing over from being called Datsun, to  Nissan, but the vehicle is badged as a Nissan Urvan.
I have found these three other articles (Datsun Urvan, Nissan Vanette and Nissan Van C22 (Vanette)), but I am unsure of the connections between the different car models.  The latter two articles are up for merge.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, in clearing up the confusion/making the articles clearer.
I've also included this post on the Nissan Caravan discussion page Tinkstar1985 05:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nissan Urvan
Talk:Nissan Vanette

message: I have an old Urvan as a farm vehicle, though we have had it since new back in the 1980s. The exterior is silver with a mostly purple/blue decal/pinstripe running the length of the body. It seats nine (in 3 rows of 3), and has the original tan fabric interior.  It looks nothing like any of the Nissan Caravans featured in the Nissan Caravan article.
When we bought it the dealership was changing over from being called Datsun, to  Nissan, but the vehicle is badged as a Nissan Urvan.
I have found these three other articles (Datsun Urvan, Nissan Vanette and Nissan Van C22 (Vanette)), but I am unsure of the connections between the different car models.  The latter two articles are up for merge.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, in clearing up the confusion/making the articles clearer.
I've also included this post on the Nissan Caravan discussion page Tinkstar1985 05:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nissan Urvan 
Talk:Chamber for Workers and Employees

message: References and some history added; help is always welcome. greetz --Darakayan (talk) 08:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert

message: theres another poster with miley instead of hannah on the AMC theater web site. its like this: http://www.mcall.com/news/local/all-rave-11282007cn,0,6526953.story?coll=all_tab01_layout —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.157.24 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to alternate the posters on different sites. The one I grabbed seems the most common one used and is of reasonably good quality. I originally had the one with Miley on it but I think the current one is better. --NrDg 01:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We should put up both of the posters  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.153.3 (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately these images are copyrighted and fair use rules kind of allows only one image for demonstration and comment - two showing the same thing is kind of hard to justify under fair use rules. I agree it would be nice to show both but I really can't think of a fair use justification to include the other one since it would be mostly for decoration. If we can find some news article that talks about both images we could include both as part of the critical commentary. --NrDg 19:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POSTER 

message: I thought the title of this is film was Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus..., not Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus....  Before this is changed, I wanted to confirm this and not screw up the linking.Jvsett (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I may be wrong, but I don't think you can set the title to anything having a backslash as that is a special character and would end up creating a subarticle called Miley Cyrus under this one. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Also the title reflects what the movie poster calls it. --NrDg 14:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I think it is misleading to say it was released in Canada when it is only playing in Toronto & surrounding area, Montreal & Halifax. That would be like releasing a movie only in New York, L.A. & Dallas then saying it was released in the U.S.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hottime65 (talk • contribs) 05:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How so?  Toronto et al are in Canada, so it was released there. When films are only released in a few cities, it is still said to have been released in the US, with it usually referred to as a limited release. If you have a source showing it only had a limited Canadian release, then the sentence could be modified.AnmaFinotera (talk) 05:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was released in all the cities in Canada and oklahoma and the US that had the ability to display the 3D picture, it was limited due to technology, not by a decision to limit it to certain cities. --NrDg 16:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RELEASED IN CANADA 

message: --76.2.65.32 (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD Release
Talk:Fullerton Police Department

message: http://www.fullertonsfuture.org/tag/kelly-thomas-beating/ Seems like a big deal to me....76.246.235.134 (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kelly Thomas beating death FBI investigation? 

message: Could someone take some time to clean up the Thomas story?  There's very detailed information direct on the OCDA's website. http://orangecountyda.com/home/index.asp?page=8&recordid=2581&returnurl=index.asp%3Fpage%3D8
and
http://orangecountyda.com/home/index.asp?page=8&recordid=2582&returnurl=index.asp%3Fpage%3D8
Vnarfhuhwef (talk) 01:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well gosh darn it, I said the same thing (and made the same link) over at the main article on the beating ([{Kelly Thomas]]). But frankly, I am too upset every time I start to edit I lose any sort of focus. Loord knows the cold facts are enough. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 03:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 
Talk:French battleship Gaulois

message: The article on the 'Charlemagne class battleship' states that there were three members in that class, not two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.106.243.15 (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Charlemagne Class

message: Hey Sturm - in rewriting French battleship Bouvet, I came across a mention of the 1906 maneuvers in the 1907 Brassey's, which noted that Gaulois almost collided with Bouvet a second time. Maybe worth mentioning here. Parsecboy (talk) 01:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about it, but decided not to since I had plenty of material. If you'd like I can see what the Gaulois article has to say about it so you can add it to the Bouvet article.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bouvet
Talk:French battleship Liberté

message: if anyone wants to upload the PD illustration here's the link Madame Grinderche (talk) 03:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Another photo is available here. Parsecboy (talk) 20:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  public domain illustration 

message: Discussing other explosions like the one that wrecked Liberté, the article states, "Six more men were killed aboard the cruiser Gloire a year later, on 10 September 1911." The linked article, however, makes no mention of such an explosion and indicates that vessel was scrapped in the early '20s. Is this article in error? Or does the other one need expansion on the issue? Drhoehl (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That article needs to be expanded - as you can see, the service history section of that page is very brief. I might get around to it one of these days. Parsecboy (talk) 21:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gloire? 

message: *The "service history" section says Captain Louis Jaurès tried to organize damage control teams. In fact, he was on shore leave at the time.
*It also says Jaurès did not hold a further sea-going command, citing the Dictionnaire des parlementaires francis [sic] de 1889 à 1940 (Jolly 1960). Jolly is not always accurate: he states that Jaurès was given command of the submarine Gymnote in 1886 when the correct date is 1892. He skips forward here: "... il fut acquitté par un conseil de guerre après la catastrophe de la Liberté. Contre-amiral en 1914, il commanda la division cuirassée des Dardanelles ...". According to this source (p.4) on 30 April 1912 Jaurès was given command of the battleship Démocratie.  
*The Démocratie and Liberté were sister ships, as were the Vérité and Justice, which should be stated somewhere. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors & omissions 

message: It states "the forward 55 m" was completely destroyed, but the illustration clearly shows that the stern of the ship received the major damage. Note that the illustration shows the ship from astern. Chris the speller yack 17:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems it's the illustration that is wrong on basically all counts. Jordan and Caresse state: "...smoke was observed pouring from the forward starboard casemate...witnesses observed a conflagration which consumed the forward superstructure...From the foremast aft, the decks collapsed toward the stern of the ship and the two midship 194mm turrets were hurled over the after superstructures. The forward part of the ship was destroyed over a length of 55m; only part of the prow and forecastle were found. Only one of the bow 305mm guns belonging to the forward turret was found protruding from the muddy bottom." There's a photo of one of the 194mm turrets, the orientation of which doesn't match any of the guns in the illustration. Parsecboy (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See the photos of the wreck here; one wonders if the darker coloring of the forward section of the hull is meant to indicate that it was destroyed. Parsecboy (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another error?