lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:N-Acetylaspartylglutamic acid

message: May I just say that this article is absoloutley amazing! Well done, guys, I truly appreciate all this information about 
N-Acetylaspartylglutamic acid. 
Cheers, Goodguy1066.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.173.18.206 (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was accidently replaced by another, but has now been fixed.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

message: Alright, it's been fixed now - Thanks guys! Mfernflower (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Bromochloromethane

message: Is Bromochloromethane the same as bromodichloromethane? The latter was delisted by California's Proposition 65 in October 1999 as a cause of cancer.  Eye.earth (talk) 07:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not the same; the former has one, the latter two Cl groups. See also: Bromodichloromethane. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Leukotriene C4

message: The molecular weight and formula for Leukotriene C4 listed on Wikipedia are incorrect, based on Merck Index and on my personal mass spectrometry of this compound.  The molecular weight is 625, and not 623 as reported on Wikipedia.  Negative ion mass spec yields 624 and positive ion yields 626, thus indicating a molecular weight of 635.  The molecular formula has has the wrong number of carbons, hydrogens, and oxygens.  
Thanks for all your efforts.
R. L. Reed, Ph.D.
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon
<e-mail redacted>
:Indeed—the chembox data were based on an incorrect PubChem record. Thank you for bringing this to attention, and by all means feel free to make further improvements to the article if you wish. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leukotriene C4 

message: "Leukotriene C4 is a leukotriene." 
What an ingenious definition and description!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.157.87.154 (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Uridine diphosphate galactose

message: 1/24/17 DennisPietras (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved out of unassessed on the genetics project 

message: — Assignment last updated by Eepygirl (talk) 02:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab - Fall 2023
Talk:Fructose 1-phosphate

message: Some comments:
1) The name has n stereochemistry
2) The name converts to the cyclic form
3)	The PubCHem link is to the cyclic form http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=717 
4)	Is there a WP:CHEM policy about sugars in linear, cyclized form?
5)	The CAS number links to both linear and cyclic forms
Compare it to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fructose_1%2C6-bisphosphate which is cyclic--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple questions about this record 

message: Some information provided may already be written in links to other topics, where it may be more relevant. Someone should check the links and see if some information is repeated unnecessarily here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZaciOne (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs review of links
Talk:K-Strophanthidin

message: I have to use their ref. in a detour way ^___^.  Anyway, it's done --124.78.215.110 (talk) 12:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  DB of Sigma-Aldrich is a bit tricky.... 

message: strophanthidin glycoside--58.38.40.34 (talk) 13:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Although it may be novel, but the IUPAC name is still needed and necessary....
Talk:Benzotriazole

message: * 
*  --Rifleman 82 (talk) 18:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: sorry about the edit mess. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_dissociation_constant#Bases_and_basicity for the connection between pKa and pKb. The template should maybe have an optional field for conjugate acid and conjugate base, including relevant properties. What do you think? Hakunamenta (talk) 12:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basicity of BTA 

message: Substance Identifier "95-14-7 ">substances (1)>get references (25032)>refine "2000-" (19694)>refine "Review" (174)" translation: 19694 journal articles, lecture abstracts, patents etc published since the year 2000.... 174 reviews.  We probably should stick to reviews or particular open-access venues in building this article because it is impossible to cite primary literature in a fair manner.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavily cited compound

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Tolyltriazole and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 13#Tolyltriazole until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Leyo 11:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tolyltriazole" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Dimethylglycine

message: This "chemical" (amino acid) has been known to be effective in treating autism. Please use a search engine for autism treatment using DMG as it is also known. It is also lesser known as N-Dimethylglycine.
:Yes, it is, as is TMG, NAC, various amino acids, chelation, etc, etc.  Unfortunately, it is also 'controversial', 'unproven' (only because the powers that be will not do the proper studies on it - this even applies when criticizing studies proposed by the NIH - "Fringe autism treatment could get federal study", Carla Clark - an NIH study on chelation criticized when chelation is 'unproven' - EVERYTHING was 'unproven' at one time or another..)  There may or may not be good enough references on it in the journals. Given this, good luck getting something on Wikipedia that won't get reverted back by the local 'proof-hounds' (Pharma Whores? Biostitutes?), or their rumored auto-edit bots..
(I didn't write either of the above). The link above no longer works I'm afraid.  I don't know what became of the NIH study, but the "Autism Research Institute" website carries a lot of data on this use of DMG. By the way what has Krebs got to do with it?Wombat140 (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "It is also sometimes given to individuals with autism, however there is no evidence for any beneficial effects."
I've been taking DMG for autism for 10 years.  It works amazingly.  My parents found it at our local hippie healthfood store when I was 8a old.  If I go off it I have trouble thinking clearly and have fits of rage.  There's a young boy in my church who takes it for autism with pretty much the same result. 192.197.54.33 (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of glycine and perhaps LY2140023 for treatment of schizophrenia should be of some interest, as autism and schizophrenia show some genetic evidence of being opposite ends of a spectrum.  It makes me wonder whether methylglycines could work as simple inhibitors of glycine in neural signalling. Wnt (talk) 07:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autism treatment
Talk:5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate

message: I corrected the IUPAC name based on the drug folitixorin shown on page 335 of http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/druginformation/innlists/P-List98.pdf which seems to be the same compound. --kupirijo (talk) 12:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC name
Talk:AICA ribonucleotide

message: The structure of AICAR is incorrect. It should not possess the phosphate group. Consequently/additionally, the discussion of the topic is incorrect and/or flawed. If I was more familiar with how to change things, I would make the changes. Until I am able to do that, I suggest this page be flagged or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.172.102 (talk) 03:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Ribonucleotide or ribotide implies a phosphate group as well. See http://biocyc.org/META/NEW-IMAGE?type=COMPOUND&object=AICAR and http://www.chemspider.com/58620 --kupirijo (talk) 22:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

text: On second thought I read the references and they refer to the riboside NOT the ribotide. May I suggest splitting the article into 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide and 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside. --kupirijo (talk) 23:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article

message: As noted above, there are two closely-related chemical compounds AICA ribonucleotide and acadesine, both of which are apparently referred to at times as AICAR.  It seems to me that some of the references used to support content in this article are actually about acadesine, not AICA ribonucleotide.  ChemNerd (talk) 20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the entirety of this to Acadesine, as all sources indeed mentioned riboside, not ribotide. KingisNitro (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Article conflating two chemical compounds?
Talk:10-Formyltetrahydrofolate

message: 10-Formyl-tetrahydrofolate → 10-Formyltetrahydrofolate —
The name without the hyphen is a more common name and the one used to refer to this page by other pages. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/10-Formyl-tetrahydrofolate --kupirijo (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have been done.--Kotniski (talk) 10:08, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to [[10-Formyltetrahydrofolate]]
Talk:Biopterin

message: Edit Required
This article needs an edit, it is using "Biopterin" referring both to TetraHyrdroBiopterin (aka BH4) and also referring to true Biopterin this being the degraded form of TetraHydroBiopterin.  This is confusing and in places incorrect.  
--Leopardtail (talk) 22:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it concluded that the deficiency in the case referenced in the SciAm article was due to the rabies itself, or something else specific to her case?  Given that it is an anecdotal case, I suppose that would be supported by animal studies of rabies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimw338 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bipterin and rabies - SciAm article 

message: The article states that Biopterin is synthesised in several tissues, including the pineal gland. However, the gene atlas at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PBB_GE_GCH1_204224_s_at_fs.png shows no expression of GCH1, which carries out the initial step of the synthesis and appears to be the main point of regulation for synthesis, in the brain. I also see little value in stating that synthesis occurs in the pineal gland, unless its role there can be expanded upon later in the article. 192.76.7.200 (talk) 11:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biopterin synthesis 
Talk:Phosphohydroxypyruvic acid

message: Why is the preferred IUPAC name listed as "2-Oxo-3-(phosphonooxy)propanoic acid", as I interpret that name to be a less common way of writing the name. 
I have replaced it to "2-Oxo-3-phosphonooxypropanoic acid" for now, but if anybody happens to read this, I would like to know why the other one was listed.  Louister41 (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The preferred IUPAC name
Talk:Isovaleryl-CoA

message: The picture included for isovaleryl-CoA in this article is wrong.  The methyl- group of the isovaleryl structure should be in the (3-) position, not the (2-) position.  The picture currently being used is actually depicting 2-methyl-butyryl-CoA (which is an intermediate in the isoleucine metabolism pathway).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.203.126.246 (talk) 22:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture of chemical structure of isovaleryl-CoA is wrong
Talk:Methylcrotonyl-CoA

message: Should this be included? Nfebrina (talk) 02:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Disregard please Nfebrina (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase (MCC) deficiency 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nfebrina (talk) 02:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab
Talk:Β-Hydroxybutyryl-CoA

message: I believe that coenzyme A should be fully protonated yet the majority of sites are charged. A WP-CHEM needs to be made about all CoEnZA compounds for consistency--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 21:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coenzyme A is protonated 

message: The stereo on this structure is not complete....check the InChI which shows:
t13-,14-,18-,19-,20?,24-. This means an undefined stereocenter in the molecule. What are the full stereospecific definitions for the molecule?--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereocenters 

message: The display of InChI on Firefox versus IE is  a problem. It expands to the whole page.--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 03:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHeck the display of InChI in Firefox versus Internet Explorer
Talk:ANTLR

message: I'm sorry, but what is the purpose of including a link to the Mantra programming language at the bottom? It doesn't seem to have much to do with ANTLR? I'm removing it for now. 63.245.220.241 16:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mantra?

message: Article refers to "LL(*) parsing", which links to the article LL_parser, which - sadly - merely uses the term "LL(*)" without either explanation or definition.  Could someone knowledgeable please supply a definition?  TIA. yoyo (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LL(*) parsing 

message: This edit adds a description of ANTLR including a description of what it does, what inputs it provides and how it differs from other similar tools.--Keating3 (talk) 12:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded Description of ANTLR 

message: ANTLR 4 has fairly decent free documentation. Is the paragraph referring to the commerical nature of the documentation still valid? Joseph.redfern (talk) 15:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation 

message: Could someone familiar with ANTRL please update the example to be easily readable to developers.  I can tell the example was slapped together without much context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:3005:5472:0:10E8:DB21:B799:7E6E (talk) 09:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example
Talk:GHRP-6

message: It is helpful to keep the biochemical use of GHRPs as ligands for receptor identification separate from the clinical discussion on growth hormone substitution in human disease conditions, in particular because GHRPs are now a recognised problem in doping, methods for the detection have therefore been established and are being applied e.g. to nutritional supplements. Farmacol (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

message: I've added a couple of tags to the article. From what I can tell, the referencing doesn't meet the requirements of WP:MEDRS and primary pieces of research are being presented as fact, when they may not be correct. SmartSE (talk) 13:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I have removed the last paragraph in the lede which made some very confusing general statement far beyond the subject, and was also unsourced. I do notice that this acticle has been sitting without significant care and feeding for a very long time. Probably not to be considered much more than a stub at this point. Gschadow (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Hexafluoroethane

message: Would it really have much of an ozone depleting effect, given that it is a fair bit denser than air and ozone?
128.54.234.129 (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ozone depletion effects 
Talk:Gallocatechol

message: The page listed at gallocatechol is shown as a redirect from epigallocatechin. Ideally, this should be the other way round, because the chemical shown is the epi- form (gallocatechin would have opposite stereocenters). Epigallocatechin is the more common name. As you are an admin, please move these pages appropriately. MatthewEHarbowy 14:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Gallocatechol" is listed as the first name at PubChem and MeSH, but this may be a situation where people in different fields use different names for the same molecule. I'd recommend that you ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry, and cross-post at Talk:Gallocatechol. --Arcadian 16:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: look at the relative number of citations for gallocatechol, gallocatechin, and epigallocatechin, for example, in geometrically increasing order in say, references for each in Google Scholar. There may indeed be different uses in different fields, but it would seem in terms of relative significance, the word "epigallocatechin" is in more common use, particularly since references to its gallate ester are legion. It may be "proper" to list it as such in MeSH, but for an encyclopedia the term "epigallocatechin" seems far more appropriate. I will crosspost to Talk:Gallocatechol. MatthewEHarbowy 23:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: The problems of disambiguation still remains. Looking at the Sigma-Aldrich page. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/ProductDetail.do?D7=0&N5=SEARCH_CONCAT_PNO&N4=G6657%7CSIGMA&N25=0&QS=ON&F=SPEC the structure currently displayed is not either enantiomer of gallocatechol, but may be epi-gallocatechol. I'm not sure what this article is supposed to be about: gallocatechol the molecule, or as a class of compound. --The chemistds (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  gallocatechol vs epigallocatechin? 

message: This article and its printable version are CONTRADICTORY!
         69.72.27.53 (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent articles 

message: Shouldn't that be GC rather than EGC in the first sentence?
It seems that "two epimers" should be "two enantiomers".
69.72.92.176 (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  a couple problems
Talk:Toluidine blue

message: Hello. I noticed in this article that the name is Tolonium chloride, with toluidine blue as another name. But in the rest of the text, only toluidine blue is used, as if this was the most used name for the chemical. Wouldn't it be a good idea to rename the article into toluidine blue, with tolonium chloride redirecting to it, instead of the current situation?--Nickele (talk) 14:32, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposition to change the name of the page 

message: It seems to me that the article toluidine blue stain is the same topic as this article.   Unless there is some technical distinction between the two that isn't readily apparent, I suggest that the two articles be merged.  Reba16 (talk) 00:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 19:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:MK-886

message: I added the part about blocking 5-lox, etc.  It is from the Wikipedia article on leukotriene antagonists.  In reality I think this should probably be reworded because if it's blocking the effect of 5 lox, I'm not sure if it's really a leukotriene antagonist, but I don't know enough about it to make that rewording change.  That's why I'm leaving it as is and leaving it for someone who knows more than me to make the rewording decision.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.15.92.103 (talk) 06:00, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:NASCAR on TNT

message: Anyone know how the coverage for the Pepsi 400 this year go over? It was... different, to say the least. PolarisSLBM 23:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So I believe the logo on the article is outdated, even though the newer logo is just a recolor. Can I switch the current logo on the article to this one?  XRGExChaos (talk) 19:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New NASCAR on TNT logo?
Talk:Ziggy Lichman

message: It's a little bit harder than with Jonathan Durden to find non Big Brother related sources for him, but there are a few out there, got one from 2005. John Hayestalk 13:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non ''Big Brother'' references 

message: I think this links to the wrong 'Northern Line' - unless he was making music before 1890! 87.194.2.26 (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Northern Line' link in 2nd paragraph 
Talk:Mark Sloan (Grey's Anatomy)

message: This guy has the same name as Dick Van Dyke's character on Diagnosis Muerder.  Coincidence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.52.104 (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Origin? 

message: You may see in other Grey's Anatomy's character pages that I had put this tag:
I want to improve these articles so I'm asking for those willing to help to find sources to back up these information. Omghgomg 12:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referenced Rampage 

message: The question has been raised for multiple characters of whether they are the "Head" of their department/area (Plastic Surgery, Traume Surgery, etc.) or the "Chief" of their department. Please see the centralized discussion started by  at Talk:Grey's Anatomy#Attending Character Titles. —C.Fred (talk) 13:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Head" or "Chief" of department?
Talk:Uropetala carovei

message: I reverted the inclusion of an external link to what appears to be a commercial site - the photos are for sale. Kahuroa (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial photos

message: There are conflicting years given in sources for the year of the first description by White. These sources say 1846: , . These sources say 1843: , . Marshelec (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy - conflicts in year of description by White 

message: Several recent reliable sources use the term "naiad" in describing the immature form eg  and  
However, the article Nymph (biology) says that the term is no longer in favour, and cites a 2016 paper from Systematic Entomology.. I am unclear. Marshelec (talk) 22:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Naiad is perfectly acceptable in the context of odonates. Have responded here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Insects&diff=1141107082&oldid=1141104958 ~~~~  Shyamal (talk) 11:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term "naiad" 

message: I attended a talk on dragonflies and damselfiles given by Ruary Mackenzie Dodds , and his collaborator Kari de Koenigswarter at Zealandia on 17 March 2023. 
The talk included a report on detailed observations of a colony of bush giant dragonfly larvae on a hillside above Eastbourne including video of larvae capturing small prey from the openings of their burrows. There is apparently a book in preparation that may provide a useful source of reference for future expansion of this article. Marshelec (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragonflies at Zealandia