Talk:Canal

message: Both the above terms are used for canals used for transportation.
Am I right in thinking that a navigation roughly follows the course of an existing river (and may utilise navigable stretches of the river), whilst a cut joins two different canals/rivers - eg across the Pennines?
  According to OED Vol. VII page 49 Navigation sense 1b:
"Inland navigation, communication by means of canals and navigable rivers."
  According to OED Vol. VII page 49 Navigation sense 7a:
"A natural inland channel. Obsolete."
  According to OED Vol. VII page 49 Navigation sense 7b:
"A canal or other artificial waterway. Now dialectal"Seniorsag 17:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut vs Navigation

message: All the canals images are from Europe. Which one can I replace?
--dlatimer 13:25, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentric 

message: Not really canals have a seperate history and are generaly viewed as seperate to channels such as the River Brue and other drains on the Somerset Levels.Geni 20:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge with Channel (geography).

message: Mispronounciation is an extremely tenuous arguement for inclusion in the "See also" links. When searching Wikipedia for "canal gas" many other articles come up, this article is not on the first page.  Inclusion of "Knallgas" on the Canal (disambiguation) page is probably the most appropriate action here? Possibly, a redirect from "canal gas" to "Oxyhydrogen" might be appropriate. ZueJay (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Knallgas is now a redirect page to Microbial metabolism, which is the only usage I can find in English, should anyone want to put it onto the disam page.--Old Moonraker 15:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried working it into the disambig page - I just don't know enough about the term (in English or German). If someone's looking up a German word in the English version, they're gonna have a tough time no matter what in trying to find it. ZueJay (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Knallgas

message: Perhaps a brief discussion of the etymology of the words "canal" and "channel" is appropriate here, under the seciton linking to "Canals on Mars"? 2Misters 02:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mars

message: This article is currently rated as B-class, ie incomplete in certain aspects or in need of substantial editing. It would be helpful if editors (preferably those who have assessed it) could make suggestions as to how it could be improved. Physchim62 (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well for a start only the Canal#Features section (1 ref) and two subsections in Canal#History section have references - lots for refs are needed to satisfy the requirement for WP:Verifiability.  Have a look at some GA-Class (such as Bristol Harbour) or FA-Class articles to see what has been achieved elsewhere.Pyrotec (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: After recent additions the material relating to Liverpool Docks seems longer than the main article itself, and too detailed for this world-wide overview. Some of the material, such as "The city of Liverpool is merging into a semi canal based city" is uncited, or even unlikely, given the city's area of 112 km2 and Merseyrail urban network. Suggest using WP:SS as next step.  --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities on water: Liverpool 

message: Something is wrong with start of first sentence. Is it missing?--Palapa (talk) 00:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was I've fixed it.©Geni 01:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern uses 

message: The article should concentrate on canal=artificial waterway for vessels and anything about a canal=artificial waterway for moving water should be moved to Aqueduct. R4emember Wikipedia is not a dictionary: we don't need an article about the word canal, we need articles about concepts: a ditch for ships, a ditch for moving water.Nankai (talk) 20:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: The problem with the definition you give is that frequently canals served both purposes, e.g. the James River and Kanawha Canal, Pawtucket Canal, etc. were used to power quite a number of mills. See talk page on aqueduct. The issue is more that the intro could be rewritten to better reflect the underlying concept that a canal has two major purposes, rather than two major types: the underlying definition is a high-volume (vs. say a ditch) flat artificial watercourse dug into the ground.Morgan Riley (talk) 01:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Oppose: The main emphasis is already on navigation and the link to aqueduct in the lead is useful to send people there. In fact the aqueduct article is itself in the process of reorganization and material can't go to what is now a disambiguation page. However I'm quite happy that the Power Canal section be moved to Aqueduct (watercourse). Chris55 (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the article 

message: I removed the new section titled "Types of canal crossing" for the time being. The section as added appears unclear, is unsourced and may well include original research. Some of the statements are misleading at best. Perhaps someone can clean it up.
Orenburg1 (talk) 16:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of canal crossing 

message: Not really sure where to bring this up, but if canals are by definition man-made, why is the Casiquiare river referred to as a natural canal? --oKtosiTe talk 18:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casiquiare river 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715230717/http://www1.somerset.gov.uk/archives/hes/downloads/EUS_GlastonburyText.pdf to http://www1.somerset.gov.uk/archives/hes/downloads/EUS_GlastonburyText.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070717234045/http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/water/bubbler/index.htm to http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/water/bubbler/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150919105030/http://www.exeter.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=7972&p=0 to http://www.exeter.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=7972&p=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The relatively shallow Lake Okeechobee
has an artificial deep channel called the "rim canal" (Lake Okeechobee#Rim Canal).
Currently this "canal" article seems to define "canal" in a way that excludes such artifical channels dug into a still-existing lake.
Is the "canal" article currently correct, and the so-called "rim canal" is a misnomer (like many other non-canal waterways with "canal" in their name)? If so, what is the name of this other kind of artificial channel?
Is "rim canal" actually a canal, and the "canal" article definition should be updated to include such artificial channels dug into a still-existing lake?
--DavidCary (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  channel dug into a still-existing lake 

message: The redirect Navigations has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Navigations]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Canals and Inland Waterways has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Canals and Inland Waterways]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: i need Novelas TV 2602:FF48:102:82:606D:6C17:E69B:BDE0 (talk) 21:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  novelas TV