Talk:Padmasree Warrior

message: Her name is misspelled. It should be spelled Warrier or Varier with is a caste  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.77.116.249 (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

message: Padmasree serves on the boards of Chicago’s Joffrey Ballet and Museum of Science and Industry, the Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Chicago Mayor’s Technology Council, Cornell University Engineering Council and advisory council of Indian Institute of Technology. She previously served on the Texas Governor's Council for Digital Economy, the Technology Advisory Council for the FCC and on the Advisory Committee for the Computing and Information Science and Engineering of the National Science Foundation (NSF).  She is also serving as a mentor in the State Department’s International Women Leaders Mentoring Partnership.
Mediathink 13:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Industry & Community Leadership

message: Mediathink 13:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing the above.  Please comment 

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 02:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Image changed to more accurately reflect subject's appearance
Mediathink 16:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Changed 

message: While I understand that Warrior was not well liked, this kind of potentially libelous information does not belong in an Encyclopedia.  Further, edits cleaning up nasty comments have been reverted, e.g.:
# (cur) (last)  03:52, 6 December 2007 207.10.229.192 (Talk) (6,048 bytes) (Undid revision 176081398 by Pwarrior (talk) Bringing back the referenced information.) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 03:36, 6 December 2007 Pwarrior (Talk | contribs) (5,583 bytes) (→Career - Be nice, please.) (undo) 
Including Bearded Women as a category is not only an embarrassment to the writers; it destroys any shred of credibility this entry may have.
69.209.229.28 (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is utterly unprofessional and is befitting of a supermarket gossip rag. 

message: What is this neutrality dispute about?  Someone has added a tag but provided no justification.  Shall I remove it? NBeale (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Note how the article reads like a press release. Read the talk page. Note the sections that were suggested and how it contains positive and negative remarks. Take a look at some of the older revisions from February of 2009 which contain both positive and negative opinions, some very harsh negative opinions. I tried to preserve some of the negative opinions to balance out the fluff of this article, but some editors (what seemed to be sock puppets) continued to delete any criticism without discussion or consensus. I wasn't the only one who had tried to preserve the article, it wasn't even my edits I was trying to keep.  Rather than continue to fight the fluff and astroturfing with balance I tried to trim it back to a more manageable less sycophantic article (completely inappropriate if you see how much well sourced criticism there was before).  The article is still fairly lopsided, you'd almost think Warrior didn't have any critics. -- Horkana (talk) 04:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I still believe this article is heavily imbalanced given the extensive amount of criticism that was previously deleted. I understand Wikipedia articles need not include criticism but amount of praise and awards listed are missing essential context, in that she was savagely criticized and to list only the praise is highly selective and far too biased in her favour. Wikipedia makes it too difficult to prevent editors from repeatedly deleting content and it was too frustrating to continue fighting it. I don't have the time and energy to fight editors unwilling to act in good faith and discuss the criticisms so I wanted to make this last comment and confirm there remains a neutrality problem with this article before I take this page off my watch list and leave it to others who might be interested in improving the article. -- Horkana (talk) 01:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this neutrality dispute about? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Padmasree Warrior. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1073963.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified