Talk:Air1

message: Hi, I am a long time listener and fan of Air1 and am taking a class on how to edit Wikipedia articles. A lot of the information on here needs more concrete resources. I would like to work side by side with you to help make this a great page. Bryanatoms 18:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey, I'm a newbie to Wikipedia, but I added a section on the News updates.
Hope this is okay
Microbyte 21:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Air1logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Air1logo.png

message: :Image:Air1logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Air1logo.png

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. No discussion/consensus. Dabpage features a link here and a non-link to something which would only remotely be hit by "Air 1". JPG-GR 07:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: It has been proposed that all station specific articles for Air 1 stations be merged into Air 1.   Stations which provide no local programming or other content and carry nothing but network provided programming lack sufficient notability to warrant an article.  However, any station that does provide sufficient local programming or has a history (such as ownership changes) which warrants coverage, should not be merged.  See WP:WPRS for more information.  Any opinions, additional information on these stations or suggestions would be appreciated.--Rtphokie (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree.  For example, CHRI-FM-1 and CHRI-FM-2 redirect to CHRI-FM.  What i don't understand is why KLRD-FM (Air 1) doesn't use the KLRD-FM-xy convention, where xy is equal to any number between 1 and 99.  Why do different stations have different call letters?  It seems like call signs in USA are bizarre.  :S  --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 17:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal 

message: This format is NOT CHR radio.  CHR means "Contemporary Hits Radio", not "Christian Hit Radio".  Although they obviously aspire to the same youthful audiences, Christian radio gets a fraction of the listenership of "secular" radio and has few "crossover" hits, with Amy Grant formerly being an admitted major exception.  If Christian radio was a major success with listeners, it would mostly broadcast by Clear Channel and Cummulus with just enough "ministry" and non-profit stations to keep the format pure, but in reality it doesn't have a large enough appeal to be mainstream and is frequently "listener-supported" and dependant upon grantsvlike sort of a religous-version of NPR.  75.200.151.103 (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHR? WRONG!