Talk:Isotopes of caesium

message: After the occurrence of 9 stable isotopes in 54 Xe with the heaviest being EE54Xe136 and having 82 neutrons (28extra neutrons above the Z number), the element 55Cs is noted to be Monisotopic with only 1 stable isotope at OE55Cs133 with only 78 neutrons (23 extra neutrons above the Z number). It also is the beginning of a stability trend away from higher stable extra neutron isotopes for 4 more isotopes down to the also Monisotopic element OE59Pr141 with 82 neutrohns (and 23 extra neutrons above the Z number). This evidently results in a rebalancing of the structure of the atom such as to permit it to return to the accumulation of 2 neutrons per ptoton along a stability trend line with the formula A = 3Z - 36 (except for 61Pm), which runs from OE59Pr141 up to EE68Er168 (which has 100 neutrons and 32 extra neutrons above the Z number), a span of 10 elements. This structural stability decay after 54Xe and subsequent return after 59Pr is indicative that the stability of the atom is related to its structural features as well as to its electrostatic and magnetic properties.WFPM (talk) 10:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caesium area stability trend data 

message: " ... caesium isotopes were released into the atmosphere where it is absorbed readily into solution and is returned to the surface of the earth ... "
There's a number inconsistency here: "isotopes" is the subject, and is obviously plural - but the following pronoun ("it") is obviously singular, as is the associated verb. Wouldn't " ... caesium isotopes were released into the atmosphere where they are readily absorbed into solution and are returned to the surface of the earth ... " be better?
121.44.172.159 (talk) 08:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the number by substituting caesium for it:  "where caesium is absorbed."  There may be a further problem in the article of not distinguishing Cesium for its ions. (PeacePeace (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar correction 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of caesium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080923135135/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf to http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/amdc/nubase/Nubase2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is well known that the properties of elemental metals differ greatly from the properties of their ions.  For example, sodium ions are part of salt, a staple of human life.  But elemental sodium is corrosive, a poison.  Thus I suggest that the article be revised to be accurate in this regard.  For example, the article states:
::"caesium isotopes were released into the atmosphere where caesium is absorbed readily into solution and is returned to the surface of the earth . . . ."
:Is it cesium that was released or its ions? (PeacePeace (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Article confuse Cesium ions with Cesium? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of caesium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610131653/http://canteach.candu.org/library/20041204.pdf to http://canteach.candu.org/library/20041204.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429095603/http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/cesium.pdf to http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/cesium.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This page currently says Caesium, Barium and Mercury have the most at 40 isotopes. 
The page for Xenon cites 40... 34 known.
The page for Tin cites 41... only 39 known.
(I didn't realise: their pages have a # symbol for isotopes that are "derived").
MBG02(talk) 19:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most isotopes  

message: 139Cs and 140Cs respectively have an alpha decay energy of 0.66 MeV and 0.03 MeV, which are quite low, so alpha decay may be possible but with a half-life long beyond imagination. 129.104.241.214 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible alpha decay of <sup>139</sup>Cs and <sup>140</sup>Cs