lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Worldwide Universities Network

message: Note that the template has a parameter which serves to alphabetize the category that is automatically added to each article. It should be used as follows:
:
or whatever would be the appropriate way to sort it alphabetically in :Category:Worldwide Universities Network. -Splashtalk 06:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage

message: We should use the default colouring provided by navbox, which is in step with the guidelines provided by wp:deviations.  There is no strong reason to deviate from this colour scheme, and many reasons use the default.  (1) The Worldwide Universities Network's own website does not use the colors in its logo for styling, and neither should we. (2) The purpose of WP is not to advertise or excessively brand pages for a particular organisation or corporation. (3) Nearly all of the other templates in :category:education navigational templates use the default, and I see no reason to deviate from it. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colouring
Talk:Intersectionality

message: 1.intersectional analysis of Celestial Bodies by Jokha Alharthi.
2.Elements of existentialism in Celestial Bodies. 42.111.225.113 (talk) 02:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intersectionality& Existentialism  

message: what are the three approaches of intersectionality? 42.111.225.113 (talk) 02:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for discussion regarding the content of the article, not to get answers for a school assignment. Read the article, you may find your answer there. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 06:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intersectionality  

message: — Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01

message: The section title says it all.  This article is a word salad conveying almost no useful information.  It mostly reads like original research of someone who has smoked too many joints.
:216.152.18.132 (talk) 06:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your comment just says to me "I don't understand enough of terminology to understanding the article and am pretending it is imposible to understand", but sure less jargon is good. Talpedia 07:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word salad
Talk:Emese

message: — JIP | Talk 06:18, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

message: In terms of improving this page, I think it would be best to create a loose translation of the more detailed Hungarian page. So I set up a sandbox page here to work on the translation. Anyone who's interested, please feel free to help edit it - translate a paragraph, proofread something, add sources, or whatever! Emika22 (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page improvements / translation from Hungarian
Talk:Song Jiaoren

message: I was looking for this article by searching for 'Song Jiao-ren' but was unable to find it because of the different pinyin system.  is it possible to make a redirect for this? 65.29.62.75 06:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Only 10 percent of the adult males were allowed to vote". I think this is not correct. Maybe this should read as 10 percent of the total population as around 40 million of all 400 million Chinese were allowed to vote. Suffrage was restricted to adult males and among those only people with a certain wealth could vote. Taking females and minors out of the equation, the 40 million may account to some 20 to 30 per cent of the adult male population but someone with access to the actual figures may correct the article accordingly. --Proofreader (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffrage in 1912
Talk:Immunostimulant

message: Where is the list of Immunostimulators? No one is listed!   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.80.190.82 (talk) 15:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NO LIST

message: I think it would be good to expand the article with info about the immunostimulants in use and under research, in particular which categories and mechanisms are known to exist, especially those within "Specific immunostimulants" (and types of vaccines could also be listed). This could be a list or a table. The different types could be get distinguished/compared there and each category of immunostimulants could list the diseases it is applied (or developed) for.
Moreover, the article never uses/explains the related term "Immune training".
I think the article should then also contain a wikilink to OM-85 and short info on the study "Protection against severe infant lower respiratory tract infections by immune training: Mechanistic studies". It's currently featured in 2022 in science like so:
A study shows how immune training via a mix of molecules extracted from certain bacteria could potentially protect infants against pervasive severe lower respiratory tract infections.
The most relevant of the study text seems to be (this could also be used to improve the article OM-85):
[Immune training (IT)] involves stimulation of long-lasting augmented innate immune function after controlled exposure to microbe-derived stimuli, manifesting in enhanced resistance to pathogens unrelated to the original stimulus. Maintenance of this broad-spectrum “innate immune memory” state appears to involve both epigenetic mechanisms and changes in the phenotypes/population size of key myeloid precursors.
The neonatal and infant periods appear to represent life phases during which the immune system is particularly susceptible to microbe-associated IT effects.
Opportunities for clinical studies evaluating this concept and elucidating underlying mechanisms are currently limited as a result of the restricted range of IT treatment agents with proven safety in this age group. The present study focuses on one such available agent, OM85, which comprises a polybacterial extract from a mixture of respiratory pathogens that have been in clinical use since the 1980s.
 Prototyperspective (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update with: info on types/mechanisms/categories of immunostimulants/immune-training
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-10-24/ArbCom election

message: It is not entirely correct about candidates. I also ran, but pulled out. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:54, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless, of course, I am getting confused on which election I participated in... :( I'm sure someone will confirm/correct my badly failing memory! Ta bu shi da yu 06:55, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I knew I did. See this edit where I withdrew. My memory ain't so bad after all! - Ta bu shi da yu 06:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article didn't list all of the 30 somthing candidates who ran; it simply gave the seven winners. :-) Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  23:15, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Oh, if you're referring to the number of candidates, I think that the official number should be the number of people that people could have voted for; i.e. because people could not vote for you, you weren't an official candidate. Thanks. Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  23:17, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: S'cool... thought I'd just note it :-) Ta bu shi da yu 10:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

message: "However, other users disagreed. "This page allows users to voice their concern about the candidates," CheeseDreams said."
CheeseDreams was a terrible POV pusher, and was highly disruptive to Wikipedia. We had a pitched battle to counter her POV-pushing, and the main reason she said this was because she disliked me. I'd like to note that the ArbCom later banned her for some time from editing Wikipedia. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:01, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info and comments, but the article included CheeseDreams's opinion because it was relevant to the topic. The Wikipedia Signpost strives to include opinions from all parts of the Wikipedia community, and we will continue trying to represent the diverse Wiki-munity that this project encompasses. Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  23:19, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's cool, but that comment was only made because of myself. - Ta bu shi da yu 10:07, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  CheeseDreams 

message: I was reading this article and all of a sudden it hit me how much I love Wikipedia...all the elaborate customs, all the quirky people contributing their nerdy energies for the silliest reasons...I really love it. Not a meagre accomplishment for the writer to have inspired this reaction, methinks. Babajobu 08:27, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your kind words! They were appreciated. Flcelloguy | A  note? | Desk |  WS  23:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit of a backhanded compliment... :-) Ta bu shi da yu 10:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I love Wikipedia
Talk:Planet of Giants

message: Just a question: here, the article states that the request to trim down the serial from four to three episodes was made by Sydney Newman (BBC Head of Drama), whereas Outpost Gallifrey's entry on the story credits it to Donald Wilson (Head of Serials beneath Newman). Can we verify where the actual request came from, be it one, the other, or both of them? – Sean Daugherty (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost episode 

message: I know this page is not on many whatchlists anymore but if anyone can put a picture more representative of the serial in the infobox it would be much appreciated. The current one looks like it could come from any cop series of the era and has little to do with what this story is about. Thanks ahead of time to anyone that can improve this. MarnetteD | Talk 15:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent work. Many thanks. MarnetteD | Talk 13:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks to RedRose64 for the caption update also. So many pictures are being deleted and I know nothing about NFCC so if either of you could check to make sure that all the t's are crossed and the i's dotted that would be great. If you've already taken care of this then again thanks. This pic represents the episode much better so I appreciate the time that you both put in on this. MarnetteD | Talk 13:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:The Rescue (Doctor Who)

message: Why is there a photo of an actress that wasn't in this episode?  This picture should either be removed or replaced with a photograph of the new companion debuted in this episode (or at least some character that appears in the episode.  The photograph is irrelevant to the article. In Defense of the Artist (talk) 18:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As stated by the image caption, "The Rescue was a short serial to introduce the replacement of Carole Ann Ford's character, Susan." This is the first episode in which Susan doesn't appear as a regular, so I believe this fact is an important one to include in the article, and there's no reason that an image (that has a fair-use rationale) can't be used to do so. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 14:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is more on this matter at User talk:Redrose64#Your revert of The Rescue. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The important part of "The Rescue was a short serial to introduce the replacement of Carole Ann Ford's character, Susan." is that a new character was introduced in this article.  A picture of the new character would be appropriate.  I can see you want this picture on wikipedia, so I'm going to move it to "The Dalek Invasion of Earth" noting that this was her final regular appearance on the show.  A photograph of an actor is only appropriate if they appear on the work that the article is about. In Defense of the Artist (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Carole Ann Ford
Talk:Totò

message: This article should be EXPANDED (it.wiki references: 272; https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tot%C3%B2). JacktheBrown (talk) 05:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  EXPAND
Talk:PCM adaptor

message: This title is silly, no one calls them "adaptors", not Sony (who invented them), not Aiwa, not Nakamichi, no one. Can someone rename this? I don't even know how to do it.
The models section is junk, too, randomly using commas and periods, and erroneously listing the F10 as the first PCM processor. If it was, where is the PCM-1?
:Does anyone have a suggestion for a better title? ~Kvng (talk) 20:11, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idiotic Title 

message: The title, although slightly odd is not inaccurate and certainly not silly. It is a very small point on a page containing much valuable information. Also to dismiss a section as junk because there are odd uses of commas and periods is going a bit too far when the essence of the section is technological information which still comes across as clear and concise. The previous commentator seems to get very upset at very minor grammatical points.
If there is missing information on the PCM-1 (I've never come across this model) then why not provide helpful additions for the model instead of just giving negative comments on the article?
One aspect I would question is the timeline for DASH/Prodigi machines. The Sony PCM-3324 came out and was widely used in prototype form in 1982 and in production in 1983, long before DAT and whilst the 2 track PCM-1610 & PCM-F1 systems were current. The Mitsubishi Prodigi models were around at this time and the 3M and Soundstream machines had been around since 1980 or earlier. The 2 track Sony DASH machines were developed and launched some years later but failed to become popular as the DASH and Prodigi formats were at the end of their life, losing out to DAT and DA88 formats  which were much cheaper and smaller.This author was the digital audio support engineer for Sony between 1982-1984 and was responsible for the complete professional range of digital audio products. 
46.34.18.218 (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why get wound up on the title? 

message: This is the name of the standard for encoding PCM audio data onto videotape, first devised by NHK in the 1960's.  Could we find more information on this standard and add it? --  Denelson83  01:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EIAJ STC-007
Talk:The Chase (Doctor Who)

message: With regards to the continuity section:
"Vicki's mention of a statue of The Beatles in Liverpool predicts the real-life memorial that exists there today."
Doesn't she mention a "memorial theatre", not a statue? 99.230.205.11 (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct.  Ian: "Vicki, I had no idea you knew about The Beatles."  Vicki: "Of course I know about them.  I've been to their memorial theatre in Liverpool."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.13.219.4 (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity 

message: The cast list uses both spellings. If it comes from Mechanus, it makes more sense to be Mechanoid, surely ? -- Beardo (talk) 23:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up the cast list needs fixing. For the TV show we go with the spelling used in the credits which used the "o". There was later media which used the "a" which you can read about here List of Doctor Who robots#Mechonoid. This, of course, leads to confusion, but again, we go with what was used onscreen for this article. MarnetteD | Talk 23:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanoid / Mechonoid 
Talk:The Celestial Toymaker

message: Hi, the article says, there are 1023 pieces in the trilogic game, which basically is the "tower of Hanoi", as I saw in the remaining part on DVD. I think, there are only 8 pieces but 1023 movements. (I'm not sure, however, if "piece" may be a synonym for movement. in this case, it is right.) --Hutschi 12:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tower of Hanoi]] with 8 pieces 

message: It's not possible for Richards' estate to complain about the similarity of Bunter and Cyril in 1963, with the story not being written let alone broadcast for three years! I'd assume it was in 1966, with the BBC adding a disclaimer on episode four. Not to speculate though, so out the date comes!MartinSFSA (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy Bunter 

message: In acknowledging that the "nigger" word has been overdubbed or de-emphasised in the audio release, the text implies that it was acceptable in 1966, by implication saying that is was near-universally acceptable. In certain circles, it obviously must have been, or the script would not have reached production. But I think it is not fair to suggest that the word was acceptable in Britain universally in the sixties. My parents (I was born in 63) certainly viewed it as offensive and they were not especially liberal. I was instructed to use "catch a rotter". Obviously, personal experiences will vary. For comparison, a reference to this word in Gilbert And Sullivan's "The Mikado" was amended some twenty years before. I would suggest this be amended to say that the word was "considered inoffensive in many circles" - I do not wish to erase the historical reality, but to reflect it better. Rob Burbidge (talk) 13:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please cite a reliable source saying any of the above. DonQuixote (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus appears to have been that in the absence of any verifiable source supporting one interpretation or the other - to instead remove any mention this (albeit probably inconsequential) point. The original mention of this can be found in Note 5 of edit 56142015. Jimw338 (talk) 03:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The N word 

message: The Toymaker character made his first canon appearance in the 3rd 2023 (Holiday?) special. Given that a number of non-canon appearances in Big Finish and other non-canon Doctor Who media.
Seems worthy of a mention, and/or a link to said special's Wikipedia entry. 172.101.144.112 (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: From the article:  DonQuixote (talk) 07:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could use a reference to 2023 special #3
Talk:The Gunfighters

message: Is there anything to suggest it isn't the only western made for British television as well? Angmering 22:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Prisoner had a western episode called "Living in Harmony".  DonQuixote 03:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting — t'was obviously the fashion in the sixties for fantasy shows to do a western! Angmering 06:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention Red Dwarf's "Gunmen of the Apocalypse". But see also Whiplash, a British-Australian quasi-western (set in Australia) from 1960. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "The first western made for British television"

message: "The Gunfighters (1987) is the last film starring by Will Sampson."
a) irrelevent, b) sentence doesn't make sense
Andral (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1987 

message: According to the documentation I have (Dr Who Program guide ) also http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/The_Gunfighters_%28TV_story%29, The Gunfighters is the eighth serial not the seventh in season 3:
. Galaxy Four
. Mission to the Unknown
. The Myth Makers
. The Daleks' Master Plan
. The Massacre
. The Ark
. The Celestial Toymaker
. The Gunfighters
. The Savages
. The War Machines
:The thing is, different sources treat "Mission to the Unknown" either as a standalone serial, or as an extra episode tacked onto the end of Galaxy Four. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eighth serial, not the seventh
Talk:The Smugglers

message: Has any reliable source reported on the possible connection between this story and "The Curse of the Black Spot", airing next month?  There has been fan speculation that the character of Avery in that story (played by Hugh Bonneville) may be the Avery whose gold is the MacGuffin in this story, but has it reached professional media such as DWM or SFX yet, or any of the tabloids? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:27, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, apparently the latest Doctor Who Magazine (which I won't see for a month) describes The Curse of the Black Spot as "a prequel, of sorts, to The Smugglers".  Can someone with access to the magazine verify this and add it, with citation, to the article?  Thanks. :) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 15:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Spot connection?
Talk:Basheba Spooner

message: A slight amount of googling shows this page to be incorrect. The woman was convicted of murdering her husband; rape was not involved. This page should be deleted until it is rewritten 
Reference:
* Murdered by His Wife: A History with Documentation of the Joshua Spooner Murder and Execution of His Wife, Bathsheba, Who was Hanged in Worcester, Massachusetts, 2 July 1778. By DEBORAH NAVAS . (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999.
::Also, note difference in spelling of subject's first name in article and in title of book. Finell  (Talk) 23:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article inaccurate
Talk:Andrea Zanzotto

message: --Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 15:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is a translation of the Italian article. No references from the original have been omitted! Note however, that about half of the article remains to be translated. -- Shunpiker 20:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article has no sources
Template talk:Hurricane season links

message: I made this just as a quick way to include the links inside  for newly-written season infoboxes, and to "upgrade" the old season articles to have consistent boxes.  However it's pretty experimental at this point.  The main problem is it's not very flexible (any changes to it will basically break all users).  However it is much shorter than the current text needed for the 5seasons list, and makes formatting consistent throughout. Jdorje 07:56, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Mercenary (band)

message: — JIP | Talk 07:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

message: ... Someone there to discuss/suggest something? like which part of which to be taken to the final one?  ---lord 15:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging... 

message: The information sounds similar to the content on http://www.karmageddonmedia.com/catalogue/karma102.htm 
Anyone can state which is the copy of which?
--84.175.35.253 16:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright? 

message: In the article it said they're heavy metal, but usually labeled as "melodic death metal" and that they have traits of power metal in some songs. I myself think melodic death metal is basically power metal but with harsher vocals and melodic death metal has a lot more in common with power metal than death metal.
I gave myself the freedom to change the genres to just melodic death metal to prevent confusion as melodic death metal is what classifies this band the best.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.253.40.247 (talk) 12:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 