lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Human/Archive 4

message: I recommend that the Table of Contents is too long -- by Wikipedia standards for Featured Articles.  So we might shorten the Table of Contents by replacing for example the 
 ==Biology==
 ===Physical characteristics===
 ===Mental characteristics===
 . 
 . 
 . 
with the following
 ==Biology==
 ; Physical characteristics 
 ; Mental characteristics
 . 
 . 
 .
The above will make the sub-headings 
; Physical characteristics
; Mental characteristics
appear in the text but not in the Table of Contents--thus making the Table of Contents shorter, without losing the readability that the sub-headings give to the text. :)  ---Rednblu | Talk 22:58, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: tried that: reduced toc by compressing "Self-Reflection" and exporting the full text to Human self-reflection, where there is more room  to expand that subject. dab 09:31, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: So unfortunately the TOC compression was a trick that didn't work.  I am disappointed.  I was looking forward to implementing it elsewhere. Tom - Talk 14:28, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of Contents

message: Here she is in all of her glory!  I cut her her from this edit.  Can someone find the citation to the scholar who says that this curvey lady is the source of the "fertility godesses" as the caption claims?  8)) ---Rednblu | Talk 05:34, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: come on. this must have been a joke. if not to breast, maybe venus figurine, or else scrap the image. dab (T) 07:47, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home for the curvey lady
Talk:Madman Across the Water

message: As a casual reader, this article confused me on a couple of points.
# "The title song, "Madman Across the Water", was set to be released on Elton John's previous album Tumbleweed Connection. However, it was set aside" — The song was recorded on August 14, so does that mean it was re-recorded? or never recorded for Tumbleweed?
# "There was an initial run of very expensive album covers with similar embroidery, used for promotional purposes (also collectors items), but as demand quickly exceeded supply, the embroidery was replaced, first by embossing (a minor collectors item), and then totally." — This sentence took me a few reads to get it. The embroidery was replaced totally, but only after the embroidery was replaced by embossing? I would clarify, but I don't even know if this is the actual meaning.
# "mat or flat printed" — I have no clue what this is. Any internal links for these formats?
# Each song is listed as having been recorded on a particular date. Did Elton really work this way? The entire song, orchestra and band, was recorded and completed in a single day? My extremely limited knowledge of music recording like this would stem from the film Nashville, where bands recorded "live" in a studio. So I'm extremely curious about this. 
Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 21:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing parts 

message: The article refers at least twice to this being EJ's fourth studio album. According to the sequence laid out in the "chronology" info box, as well as the information provided in the articles on the individual albums, this is his fifth studio album. I had edited the article to reflect that, but reverted the edit after seeing that the numbering of subsequent albums seems to follow the idea that "Madman" is indeed the fourth. Maybe it's a mistake... maybe it's a "UK releases vs US releases" thing, given that Empty Sky wasn't released in the US until '75... but whatever the reason I felt that I am not qualified to change an entire string of entries. PurpleChez (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: My edit of the article based on this discrepancy was reverted. So be it. But the discrepancies should nonetheless either be corrected or explained.PurpleChez (talk) 19:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  chronology 

message: The Wikipedia discography says this was his only album released in 1971. JGWatts (talk) 12:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the only studio album he released in 1971, but the 17-11-70/11-17-70 live album and Friends soundtrack were also released that year. The article should probably be updated with more precise language. J.e.norton (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd album in 1971?
Talk:I and Thou

message: please give a definition of an 'I, Thou' moment
Also please give a publication date for the book
:* Good point! I believe Buber wrote/published I and Thou in 1923 and it was first translated into English in 1937. I will update the article soon, unless someone beats me to it. Keesiewonder 03:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: I fail to see a meaningful connection between Martin Buber's text I and Thou and the website  provided at the end of the article. Can someone enlighten me? I'll wait a bit and then delete it ... Keesiewonder 03:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  www.ithou.org 

message: The Multiple Issues flag has been on since 2008 for citations needed. I think citations to the text would resolve the "personal essay" tag added in 2010, as it does seem to be a reasonable summary of what Buber said in the book. I've done some copy editing to make it read less like a somewhat too literal translation from German. Bn (talk) 00:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: Some sources I found to support notability and to expand the article:  — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 18:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Feel free to help me brainstorm a better title for a possible new section. I felt this article was missing a very important piece -- the lasting impact that Buber's ideas of I and Thou have left upon culture and thinking. For example, Carl Rogers and his theories, as well as Martin Luther King Jr. citing I and Though in his letter from Birmingham Jail. I am open to input from this community, and either way will begin drafting a possible section. Pheonix.ember (talk) 02:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a New Section: Contributions to Psychology/Lasting Impacts? 

message: >> the word pair "I–Thou" can refer to a relationship with a tree, the sky, or the park bench itself
>> as much as it can refer to the relationship between two individuals.
I-thou relationships can also relate to non-material "objects" like one's future.
Would be great to add this some time.
Thx Ron Woepwoep (talk) 05:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-thou relationships
Talk:Hard Normal Daddy

message: The tracklist listed here previously was incorrect (I had the same problem when ripping the album to my computer, (AMG has this incorrect tracklisting in their database.)  Corrected, and a few notes are added.  --Insomniak 05:03, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Not sure if we really need a review box with only one review. The prose explains it better and the infobox for it should probably only be there to give an overview. Since we don't really need an overview for such a short review, I don't think we need the infobox right now. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Review box
Talk:Goodbye Yellow Brick Road

message: WHAT CRAP  THAT THIS ALBUM HAS ONLY SOLD 12 MILLION WORLDWIDE, YOU USED RELIABLE REPORTS THAT IT HAS SOLD 30 MILLION FOR YEARS NOW THATS ONE HELL OF  A DIFFERENCE AND ITS RUBBISH !!12:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  goodbye yellow brick road 

message: I was surprised the documentary was barely mentioned in the article. I remember seeing it on a program like Midnight Special or some other music oriented program. Fascinating glimpse into how the group worked at that time. I know this is an article about the album, but since the documentary is related should info be given on the documentary with whatever source cites can be found?THX1136 (talk) 00:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary ??s 

message: The article on Elton’s album “Madman Across the Water” refers at least twice to it  being EJ's fourth studio album. According to the sequence laid out in the "chronology" info box, as well as the information provided in the articles on the individual previous albums, it is his fifth studio album. I edited that article to reflect that, but reverted the edit after seeing that the numbering of subsequent albums – including this one – seems to follow the "Madman" chronology. (This article describes "BYBR" as seventh, rather than eighth. Maybe it's a mistake... maybe it's a "UK releases vs US releases" thing, given that Empty Sky wasn't released in the US until '75... but whatever the reason I felt that I am not qualified to change an entire string of entries. PurpleChez (talk) 16:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  chronology 

message: I believe the section describing "Harmony" being popular on a Boston radio station really ought to use the call letters of the station at the time of the album's release: (WROR?). Only in the 21st century did that station transition into being WBZ-FM. I would correct this myself, but I am not certain if WROR is indeed the station in question, but it does make more sense. 146.115.179.142 (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WBZ-FM vs. WROR
Talk:Granary Burying Ground

message: Elizabeth Foster Goose also  known as Mary Vergoose (promoted as the original "Mother Goose" behind famous nursery rhymes, although scholars dispute the idea)... As User:DreamGuy has rightly pointed out, this is "disputed." More than that, in fact: it's perfect nonsense, since "Ma Mère l"Oye" was credited by Charles Perrault in his fairy tales published in 1697, and the phrase appears a generation earlier than that. See Mother Goose. Anyway, I've removed the section of text. --Wetman 05:37, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: hmm... hadn't occurred to me. --Wetman 10:39, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Removed "slave from Crispus Attucks; as the Attucks article itself notes, no record exists of him ever being a slave. --Tsuyoshikentsu 21:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crispus Attucks 

message: I visited this cemetery today, and noted a large monument in the middle with "FRANKLIN" on it. Who's this?
Benjamin Franklin, born in Boston, left a legacy requesting that the city place a monument honoring his parents in the yard. It was later replaced; the plaque on the front of the current obelisk is from the original.
B.Franklin is buried in Philadelphia, where he went to live after the altercation between himself and his brother/apprentice master James, as he describes it in his Autobiography.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.167 (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ___ Franklin 

message: I thought I'd try moving some images into an image gallery. It's a little weak, with only three images, but I think it cleans up the article a little bit, and with its own section it adds a table of contents (which I love... they seem to add a little legitimacy). But, I'm not committed to it. What do other people think? --Midnightdreary 02:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image gallery 

message: One bit I think is missing here, and I'll try to do some research to fix it, is that the graveyard was neatened up back in the 1800s.  The markers do not actually correspond with anything beneath them as a rule, as they were moved to be in nice straight lines rather than anything having to do with, y'know, the actual graves.  I suppose that was considered irrelevant. - Denimadept (talk) 23:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placement
Talk:David Hawker

message: Is the seat of Hawker named after a family member?
Yes, it was named after Charles Hawker, who was MP for Wakefield 1929-38. Adam 07:12, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looking at the suggested 'personal website' it appears that this is not an acctual personal website, just a stand-alone page that badly transcripts info from this wikipedia page. Should it be removed?  Patrick 2:56, 4 Feb 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal website
Talk:Caribou (album)

message: The article on Elton’s album “Madman Across the Water” refers at least twice to it  being EJ's fourth studio album. According to the sequence laid out in the "chronology" info box, as well as the information provided in the articles on the individual previous albums, it is his fifth studio album. I edited that article to reflect that, but reverted the edit after seeing that the numbering of subsequent albums – including this one – seems to follow the "Madman" chronology. (This article describes "Caribou" as eighth, rather than ninth. Maybe it's a mistake... maybe it's a "UK releases vs US releases" thing, given that Empty Sky wasn't released in the US until '75... but whatever the reason I felt that I am not qualified to change an entire string of entries. PurpleChez (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  chronology
Talk:Scott Joplin

message: This article contains conflicting information:
* In section 4 "Later years and death" it states "Treemonisha went unnoticed and unreviewed ... it would not be until the 1970s that the opera received a full theatrical staging."
* In section "5.1 Treemonisha" it states "... Joplin succeeded in performing Treemonisha for paying audiences in Bayonne, New Jersey, in 1913."
I'm not knowledgeable enough to adjudicate but clearly both, as they stand, cannot be correct. Thank you. Mercury543210 (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treemonisha - was it unperformed before 1970s or was it performed in 1913?? 

message: Shouldn't there be a list of songs and musical pieces he wrote? FloridaArmy (talk) 15:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @FloridaArmy There is: List of compositions by Scott Joplin Maineartists (talk) 15:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Should it be merged here so it's easier to find and more accessible? I see it links playable songs. I didn't see the link to it looking at the bottom of this page where discography or a list of works is usually included. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because a discography is a completely different thing from a composition list. Joplin's actual discography, I believe, consists of a few piano rolls and that's it. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They were not requesting an insertion for an actual Discography for Joplin. If you read it, the OP writes: "I didn't see the link to it looking at the bottom of this page where discography or a list of works is usually included." They are simply pointing out location where normal listings occur. Maineartists (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

text: No. When a list of composer's works are lengthy, a separate page is created. The link is usually provided at the beginning of the section describing their output: Scott Joplin Works. i.e List of compositions by Ludwig van Beethoven Maineartists (talk) 16:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography?
Talk:Rock of the Westies

message: Ann Orson/Carte Blanche.
I think there is an innacuracy in that matter, isnt't there? Once is written it was a moniker used when Elton John wrote a song on his own (words as well) and once - a moniker of Elton and Bernie (writing song together, as always - what in my opinion not really makes sense). What do you think?
And what about Lady/Lord Choc Ice?
Regards 217.149.252.162 (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It says that John came up with the moniker when he wrote a song by himself, but that it is used here to refer to both John and Taupin. BlueSwede92 (talk) 01:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The title is a spoonerism on the phrase "West of the Rockies""
Spoonerisms involve the misplacement of morphemes, not entire words. "Rest of the Wockies" would be a spoonerism of the type indicated. Harfarhs (talk) 02:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a spoonerism
Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board/British Columbia

message: FYI, I'm fishing for feedback over on Talk:British Columbia general election, 2005 -The Tom 05:55, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Elections

message: BC Government bios for every current MLA: http://www.governmentcaucus.bc.ca/2482/. This site also has head shots for the media's use. Does this mean we can use them for Wiki? --Westendgirl 08:10, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Earl Andrew 21:26, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  The list of MLAs is now 2 years out of date. Current MLAs are at: www.leg.bc.ca Canuckle 00:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLAs
Talk:House arrest

message: Should I add Galielo, from Italy, as a famous example? Billvoltage 22:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galileo? 

message: If anyone is interested, the situation of Paul (in Rome) in the Acts of the Apostles could be added.--216.15.48.37 (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul in Acts of the Apostles 

message: Should Andrew Tate's notable house arrest in Romania be added in a subsection, as a contemporary example? 123.243.118.76 (talk) 14:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Andrew Tate under a Romania section?
Talk:Kalyan

message: I reverted edits by 61.11.2.202 to last version by Rich Farmbrough. The edits in question appeared to be in place to promote certain businesses. If you have any sources for your statements regarding the increase in house purchasing, or the educational or air quality, please list them here. — Knowledge Seeker দ (talk) 08:19, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hyperreflexia

message: Decreased or absent responses are most definately not hyperreflexia. It is also incorrect to classify "Basically any abnormal response to stimulus..." as hyperreflexia.  See, for example, hyporeflexia. Osmodiar 08:35, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://calder.med.miami.edu/pointis/automatic.html, http://www.nspnvt.org/sci_info/disreflexia.html and likely others. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Compact element

message: How can c be "way below" itself?
--karlheg 08:35, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)
:Inconceivable, right?  Perhaps the word does not mean what you think it means....
:We say that an element x is called "way below y" if x is an element of every ideal I satisfying sup(I) ≥ y. 
:Since the principal ideal generated by y satisfies this condition, we know that any x which is way below y must be in it, i.e., must satisfy x≤y -- but not necessarily x<y.   
:(So the short answer is:  the word "below" has to be interpreted as "below-or-equal".) 
:Aleph4 11:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In view of this definition, the term "way below" merely duplicates in obscure language the preceding condition, which is the definition of being "way below" itself.  I removed it. Zaslav 09:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Way below

message: The introduction is incomprehensible.  Someone should write a clear and simple intro that does not require previous knowledge.  I will see if I can do it, but others are welcome to the job. Zaslav 09:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: I removed the following remark: "Compact elements are standard."  It makes no sense.  Is "standard" a technical term?  Then it needs explanation; please, someone, do that.  If not, then what does the sentence mean? Zaslav 09:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Standard

message: Given the complete lattice determined by the open sets of an arbitrary topological space ordered by set inclusion, the compact elements are not the compact sets of the space since in general compact sets are not open (and so would not even be members of this lattice).  As far as I can tell, the name "compact" comes from the analogy with the topological definition, unless there is a restricted set of topological spaces for which this is true.
Ron.garcia (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: Please add sections:
#See also
#References
#Notes
#Further reading
#External links
Thanks, Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 09:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references
Talk:Place de la Bastille

message: Somebody who knows more French than me ought to convert the history of the Place de la Bastille from the French Wikipedia. I particularly like the bit about the monument en forme d'éléphant. --Paul A 08:40, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I translated the french paragraph, but someone who knows english better than me ought to make sure it's properly written Equendil 03:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: French-language version

message: I tried to revert it back to the Feb 27 version before the recent anonymous changes.  There may be some new information in the mess but the previous page was destroyed in the process.  Both of my attempts failed.  I'm not sure what I did wrong.  Gavroche42 16:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, easily fixed. It's a lovely page with nice pics. It would be nice to have some more info on the nightlife area. SuzanneKn 21:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help, I can't seem to fix this 