Talk:United Kingdom casualties of war

message: Military + Civilian figures don't add up to the total. 194.80.106.135 16:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Ireland 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on United Kingdom casualties of war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100724231123/http://www.mod.uk:80/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/DoctrineOperationsandDiplomacyPublications/OperationsInIraq/OpTelicCasualtyAndFatalityTables.htm to http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/DoctrineOperationsandDiplomacyPublications/OperationsInIraq/OpTelicCasualtyAndFatalityTables.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on United Kingdom casualties of war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100423032235/http://www.mod.uk:80/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/DoctrineOperationsandDiplomacyPublications/OperationsInIraq/OpTelicCasualtyAndFatalityTables.htm to http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/DoctrineOperationsandDiplomacyPublications/OperationsInIraq/OpTelicCasualtyAndFatalityTables.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120929201010/http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/OperationsFactsheets/BalkansBritishFatalities.htm to http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/OperationsFactsheets/BalkansBritishFatalities.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071214220327/http://www.regiments.org:80/wars/20thcent/19afghan.htm to http://www.regiments.org/wars/20thcent/19afghan.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080118142724/http://www.regiments.org:80/wars/20ww1/russia.htm to http://www.regiments.org/wars/20ww1/russia.htm#casualties
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071101060611/http://members.ozemail.com.au:80/~clday/afghana.htm to http://members.ozemail.com.au/%7Eclday/afghana.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080115012004/http://www.regiments.org:80/wars/19thcent/53crimea.htm to http://www.regiments.org/wars/19thcent/53crimea.htm#casualties
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927062322/http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/siteinfo/newsround/wardead.html to http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/siteinfo/newsround/wardead.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on United Kingdom casualties of war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141228130543/http://icasualties.org/ to http://icasualties.org/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://britains-smallwars.com/RRGP/AMETHYST.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/last.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110725102127/http://www.britishcyprusmemorial.org/roll to http://www.britishcyprusmemorial.org/roll
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090105162147/http://www.uk.or.kr:80/wargrave/ to http://www.uk.or.kr/wargrave/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070403191133/http://www.forcesmemorial.org.uk:80/ to http://www.forcesmemorial.org.uk/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090213191140/http://gunga-din.co.uk:80/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=11&Itemid=94 to http://www.gunga-din.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=11&Itemid=94
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Where do the figures for the so-called "War on Terror" come from?  The footnote references do not seem to be relevant.
Jim Whitaker (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. "War on Terror" is not an accepted "war", anymore than the "War on drugs" or the "War on poverty" is.  While truly a critical struggle, it does not belong on this page as right or wrong it is a political catch phrase.  As a result, I have removed the reference.Tgm1024 (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "War on Terror" figures 

message: "Casualties" does not mean dead-only.  It includes wounded, even in military contexts.
This is so commonly misunderstood.  "Common usage" has not caught up with the stats.  When looking around various war statistic sites, some stats (tacitly) do imply that casualties are death only.  Others include wounded.
The Oxford English dictionary definition of "casualties" is listed as:
A person killed or injured in a war or accident
::1.1 A person or thing badly affected by an event or situation.
::1.2 British The department of a hospital providing immediate treatment for emergency cases.
::1.3 (chiefly in insurance) an accident or disaster.
This is true among other dictionaries as well.  Further, The American Heritage Dictionary makes this strong comment at the end of their usage note:
::Sometimes, however, people use casualties to refer only to individuals who have died, not to those who have been injured. This usage is often considered an error. In our 2013 survey, 60 percent of the Usage Panel disapproved of a sentence where casualties was used to mean "fatalities" only: Officials have reported 21 casualties from yesterday's earthquake. In addition to those fatalities, 79 people were seriously injured.
We must be careful when sourcing these things, because the specific meanings might be hidden.Tgm1024 (talk) 14:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the problem: "Casualties" includes wounded. 

message: Where are the figures for this please.46.7.195.132 (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberation of Kuwait