lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Foundational crisis of mathematics

message: The exploration into what science is, is part of a greater discourse in humanity about what anything is at all. The role of formalisms in science, including mathematics, evokes and spurs new forms of thinking, art, dance, music, movies, computer programming and what not. That there are deep and powerful -- and hugely interesting! -- unresolved questions in mathematics is a thing which implies the honesty of human thinking.
The section on Foundation problems in mathematics shows that mathematics is not a sect, it is not about fanatism, it is not about belief, it is not secterian, it is not a religion: it is an honoring of such trends of thoughts as Sextus Empiricus dedicated himself to: sceptisism, as a sense of wonder, a looking about, without fundamentalist certainty but willingness to discover, and discover also truth.
So this section should not at all be closed down. It should be vastly expanded!
And I am sure it should be crosslinked with such resonant themes as foundational problems in physics. 
Aristo Tacoma, Sydney, 2006
:I really don't see what distinction you're making between a foundations problem in mathematics, and just plain foundations of mathematics. There's plenty of opportunity in foundations of mathematics to discuss aspects of various foundational approaches that people find problematic. Moreover the current "problem" article has almost no content (and what there is is POV); those problems could be fixed, but I see no reason the resulting content doesn't belong in a section of foundations of mathematics. --Trovatore 02:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I looked back in the history to the original article, and it was much clearer what it was talking about. So I reverted to that version, with a couple minor edits for clarity, and to avoid having the article make the claim that cognitive science has succeeded in giving mathematics an empirical basis. --Trovatore 02:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree, this section (Foundation Problems in Mathematics) is important 

message: Then all the stuff about quasi-empricism and cognitive science should be in one but not both articles.
--M a s 18:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  If not merge
Talk:Painted turtle

message: Import of painted turtles into the EU (including UK) has been banned since 2005 to protect native species of turtles.  This seems relevant and important enough to merit inclusion in this article but I'm not sure where. Can anyone suggest? AndrewRT(Talk) 18:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Distribution, in section Human-introduced range.  Sun Creator(talk) 17:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Import to EU banned 

message: — Assignment last updated by Huginnscientia (talk) 04:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Evolution
Talk:Political uniform

message: :You tease, you flirt
:And you shine all the buttons on your green shirt
::-- Elvis Costello, "Green Shirt", from This Year's Model (1978) 
-- Karada 11:27, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I've added black berets and the IRA. Perhaps sashes should be included as well: I wonder if we should we count organizations like the Orange Institution as uniformed political movements? Their ceremonial costume is certainly a uniform. and Orange_Institution#Political_links presents plenty of evidence for their having political goals. -- The Anome (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadening the definition 

message: How could they be "secret" if they walked around in a uniform that betrayed their affiliation? Luke (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also debatable if they even had a uniform and it wasn't just in their name. UniformsGuy (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Chinese Blue Shirt Society, a secret clique within the Kuomintang 

message: Like, maybe it should just be a section on the main page for Uniforms? Most of this page is filled with fascist organizations (and most of them just copying each other), the 'youth groups' section contains what were just Soviet/East Bloc equivs to the Boy Scouts rather than a non-state party, and putting non-fascist groups next to fascist ones just because of a similar type of clothing feels a little disrespectful to the non-fascist ones.
A lot of them also aren't really 'uniforms' per se, such as the Yellow vests or groups that just have berets or sashes. UniformsGuy (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article even be a thing?
Talk:Mohammed Atef

message: The recon video found in his house is viewable here Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  05:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I would like to see the lead section expanded, to give something of a summary of the article. If that is done, I will be glad to rate the article as B-class. PKKloeppel (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class checklist

message: When was he born, there are three dates posted. androo123  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.182.78 (talk) 05:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There were probably no birth certificates in Egypt at the time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.21.214 (talk) 14:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Born????
Talk:Walid bin Attash

message: Any indication of his nationality? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  23:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wright lists him as a Yemeni (p. 310) Sherurcij (Because you can't fight terror by spreading fear)  00:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2008

message: Another contributor removed an image from this article with the edit summary: 
I just responded to a similarly poorly explained excision here, where I wrote: "I request[ed] them to be more specific. Our article on propaganda further breaks down propaganda into types of propaganda. If the image was really being used as "propaganda" it should have been a trivial matter for them to identify what kind of propaganda it was."
I request responses at Talk:Ravil_Mingazov rather than here, to keep related responses together. Geo Swan (talk) 14:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  As a courtesy to other to other contributors could we please discuss controversial edits on the talk page, not in the edit summaries? 

message: I suggest to move to Walid Bin Attash. I do not see any reason for the ' in his name. Any objections. IQinn (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: move

message: The COI template was placed in June 2012 without any information on the editor who had an apparent conflict of interest. There was no discussion on this talk page either. I've removed the COI template. Mnnlaxer (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted COI template 
Talk:Bruce Trail

message: Someone (67.136.58.222) added a link http://www.footprintpress.com/BruceTrail/btPreview.htm which is just a page advertising a book about the Bruce Trail. I don't think this is appropriate content. Is it OK to remove what someone else has added? If so who makes that decision?
Moved reference to book under new "Books" section with standard ISBN link. --Ptrbnsn 17:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be good to distinguish between runs and conventional hikes on the fastest times so as to compare apples to apples.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.93.4 (talk) 23:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest Times
Talk:Oxo (food)

message: "origin of the name is unknown...". At a guess, I expect it's a play on the word ox. Similiar to the US product Jello? Markb 12:28, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The Oxo cube (as opposed to generic stock cubes) was created by Charles Gunther who presumably also founded the company. This isn't noted in the article. Supporting link . danno_uk 20:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creator of the Oxo cube 

message: The article focuses on the gravy cubes, and also mentions only a few countries (UK, South-Africa, Canada...) However, in Belgium, and probably in other countries too, one can buy liquid gravy under the Oxo label, this ought to be mentioned in the article. For one illustration, see https://www.hanos.be/nl/Assortiment/Droge-kruidenierswaren/Bouillons%2C-soepen-en-fonds/Bouillons/Nat/OXO-BOUILLON-VOOR-40L/p/22108201 bt there must be more. Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liquid gravy
Talk:Converse, Indiana

message: Did they move the county line?  The last time I was in that area, Converse was in Miami County, not Grant.Al Lowe 12:37, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NOTAR

message: The previous version of this article stated that NOTAR rotorcraft use airflow directed from the engine exhaust to combat torque reaction. If NOTAR systems used engines to produce the airflow, they would lose all yaw control in the event of engine failure. NOTAR rotorcraft use a fan driven by the main rotor transmission to produce the required airflow - my changes reflect this.
M1thag0 12:42, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Erroneous Engine Exhaust Reference

message: There is a dispute in the text of the article that needs resolution:  The "Disadvantages" section claims a problem with control at high airspeeds, while the paragraph ending the "Use" section says that is inaccurate.  Resolving this sort of thing is what the talk page is for, guys!  --72.70.13.114 (talk) 00:51, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute within article text 

message: Should there not be a disadvantages section? The technology isn't completely Infallible. Issues such as efficiency and control at high airspeed have been mentioned on some websites. FitzyJ (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disadvantages 
Talk:Sokora Refugees

message: What happened to this comic?  It hasn't updated since October 10th, and I can't seem to find any explanation on the site.  And the last post was just a book cover and a statement that the book came out. --Skyfaller 03:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction: They haven't updated since Nov 10 now, and the update was only to say that "Segamu" is being forced to take a leave of absence, so things may not be the same and it may be a while before they resume updates.  At this point, I think it's safe to say that the comic is dead, which is a shame because I had just discovered it when it upchucked and died. -- Skyfaller 22:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 13 January 2007, the Sokora's website can't be reached. It seems like the domain name has expired and hasn't been renewed. SirDarius 22:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The webpage is back up, but I do not know since when. And there is no new content or even a new explanation about the disappearance. -- 171.66.35.44 03:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the updates? 
Talk:Dodecameric protein

message: Should this page me moved to 'dodecamer', and links made into dodecameric? --Dan|(talk) 12:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I saw an article called monomer, so thought that this article should be called dodecamer (rather than dodecameric).
--Dan|(talk) 13:35, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved
Talk:Duffield, Derbyshire

message: Victuallers 18:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I was always told there was a difference in 'social standing' and even a difference in the pronunciation of the village name, betweeen those in Duffield proper (west side of Derwent) and those on Duffield Bank (east side) ??? True or False?Linuxlad
Well no. The people on Duffield Bank were preceived as pretty remote. As I mentioned in the article, the management built houses up King Street and later Hazlewood Road, while the workers lived in the villages and the council houses in Holloway Road. There was very little middle class until the Wimpey estates were built. Hence the dichotomy. There were two bus stops on the A6, (the Trent number 2 to Belper), one in the centre and one just north of the castle. Hence the bus conductors (remember them?) nicknamed them 'Dooffield' and 'Daffield'.
There was also a scurrilous rumour that Duffield people had webbed feet from the frequent flooding.
Chevin 14:54, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: West Side Story?

message: Apparently the distance is given as four miles on a signpost, however it has been known as five all my life. Multimap gives 4.65 from Town Street to Derby Market Place. It depends on the reference points. Can anyone confrm? Chevin (talk) 09:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Distance from Derby

message: This page used to be at Duffield but was moved to Duffield, Derbyshire when a disambiguation page was created at Duffield. This broke all the existing wiki links. As a compromise I have created a more complete Duffield Disambiguation page at Duffield (disambiguation) and pointed the empty Duffield article at the Duffield, Derbyshire page. Victuallers (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Moves

message: Just in case anyone accuses me of plagiarism, I would like to mention that User  84.65.34.188 took some of the text off my already existing site way back at the beginning to use here. I don't mind however. :-) Chevin (talk) 12:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright?
Talk:Vib-Ribbon

message: There are two broken images on this page (which I've created intentionally).
I want to reuse the images from French Wikipedia:
 &
How?
Richard W.M. Jones 13:07, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken images 

message: I think we should split Laugh and Peace into their own article. They are a band in their own right that have done much more than six tracks in a little known Playstation game. That being said, I'm no expert on them so I can't contribute much towards their article, other than existing sources. Scoochi2 (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Splitting" would not be the right word to use here; if you have more info on them, or you can translate from Japanese , start the article on them.--Stormwatch (talk) 05:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Stormwatch, there's not enough information in this article to split out; however, if there are enough reliable sources, an article can be created on the Laugh and Peace group. SilkTork *YES! 11:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split - Laugh and Peace 

message: The video for this song bears a striking resemblance to the game. I actually saw the video a long time ago and wondered what the 2d-scroller come-to-life theme was about, and now it makes a lot of sense having seen this game. 126.246.63.28 (talk) 08:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROBOTS IN DISGUISE - 'We're in the Music Biz'
Talk:List of proteins

message: Perhaps we need to define our protein naming ontology here?
Generic protein classes (like billins) above more specific protein names (like phycobillin). Perhaps that is a bad example, but proteins have general names and isoforms and synonyms and alternate spellings, all of which should be described by some naming ontology to allow best use of the community effort. Currently there is no protein naming ontology in existence, where better than wiki to start one? --Dan|(talk) 13:08, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Possible starting place: GO slims, whole proteome analysis (wikipedia proteome root page). --JWSchmidt 02:59, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't think this list should exist. There is no use in having a list of ALL proteins - it would get so long and cumbersome that it would be of no use to anyone. We're better off starting much more specific lists, like "List of motor proteins," "List of cell cycle proteins," "List of proteins in proteolysis," etc. and then grouping those lists into a List of protein lists.  Mr.Bip 20:45, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't even start

message: This is not a List of proteins, it is a List of non-enzyme proteins.  I believe the name should be changed to reflect this difference as described in the WP:LEAD of the list.  Thoughts?  ju66l3r 19:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move name? 

message: Am I in the wrong place for plant proteins? This is the list of ALL proteins is it not?   Velella  Velella Talk   20:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Plant proteins 

message: I made a new article: List of proteins in the human body , that tries to make a framework for merging the info in this an other sub pages. let me know what you think about the idear and how it could be pulled off better? Claes Lindhardt (talk) 12:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New list trying to merge the info from this an other pages 

message: , motivated by your comment on the lack of a readable high level articles about types of proteins, I have largely rewritten this page.  This clearly needs a lot more work, but do you think it is going in the right direction? Boghog (talk) 13:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , yes, this is definitely a big step in the right direction. I was thinking this morning about possible classifications that I'd have put at List of types of proteins instead of the stuff that's there at the moment, and concluded that they could be sorted by function, by subcellular location, or perhaps according to their characteristics (soluble, membrane-bound, but by 3d-structure is also good); you've obviously come to the same conclusion, and added species distribution, which is an excellent idea too. We could add a link to 's lists of human protein-encoding genes in the species distribution section. The current article, now you've worked on it, renders List of types of proteins completely unnecessary, and is now well on its way to being a good entry point for the general reader. Thank you for your efforts. Elemimele (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Royal Air Force Police

message: The infobox previously, erroneously, displayed the red MP patch as the TRF. As per RAF publication AP1358 (Uniform Dress & Appearance Regulations for the Royal Air Force) Chapter 7, para 0737, "A red MP patch (6.5 x 5 cm) is worn on combat uniform to identify the wearer as RAFP. It is to be worn immediately below the RAF TRF or EAW/EAG badge on the right blanking plate" (my emphasis). The red patch is not the TRF. Keri (t · c) 02:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRF 

message: Needs updating
See https://www.raf.mod.uk/our-organisation/force-protection/raf-police/
Sammartinlai (talk) 09:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation 

message: The RAFP has changed significantly, the operating model has totally restructured Wings and Sqns. 
Changes made to the page reflect changes described by the PM WO 2A00:23C6:88B7:AA01:CCD:6921:5248:D8A8 (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive Operational model changes 

message: The photograph in the Training section is not helpful because it does not show anything related to the training of the RAF Police. I suggest replacing it. Dreddmoto (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs
Talk:First Republic of Korea

message: I can't tell from the article when this republic is considered to have ended. Kappa 13:45, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hope it's slightly clearer now.  All of these articles need work, so that they tell the story of their period coherently.  -- Visviva 14:21, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did it end? 

message: Just saying, the national anthem here is Auld Lang Syne.  Not sure if that's correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.129.5.105 (talk) 02:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: National Anthem?
Talk:Japanese ship naming conventions

message: The statement "For example, Akagi is probably perceived as "red castle" by Japanese about as often as Philadelphia is perceived as the "city of brotherly love" by Americans." lacks context for those not familiar with Philadelphia or how Americans refer to it. Is it often or not often at all? JRR Smith 22:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of brotherly love? 

message: The assertion that carriers *post 1943* were named after mountains using the example of the Akagi isn't correct.  The Akagi was sunk in 1942 during the Battle of Midway. Similarly, the Kaga is named after a province but was also sunk in 1942.
Arthur 00:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrier Naming Conventions 

message: In the introduction, the article currently states, offhandedly:
:Japanese warships have never been named after people. 
But then in the "Early conventions" section:
:During the early years ships were often donated by the Shogunate or Japanese clans and the original clan names were kept.
Indeed, I was led here from the article on the Date-Maru. But surely clan names, at least in some sense, are names of people? I'm not sure how to fix this. Perhaps the introduction should say "Japanese warships have never been named after specific people", which (I presume, not having any particular knowledge of the subject) would be more accurate. Comments? --Iustinus 19:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming after people 

message: The article on the fictional Star Trek ship Kobayashi Maru gives a different translation for the word Maru than the one given here -- that article claims that maru means "spirit [of]", with Kobayashi Maru thus meaning "spirit of Kobayashi."  I suspect that the Japanese ship naming conventions article is correct, but I don't speak Japanese, so I wanted to throw this out there to get an opinion. --Jfruh (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with Star Trek-related article
Talk:Mankato, Minnesota

message: There is a website (http://city-mankato.us/) that is seemingly popular. The site is a joke, but the existence of this site should at least be mentioned--Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feel like this should be added 

message: The motto "Now Playing" was removed because it's a slogan from the visitor's bureau, so not actually the city motto. I'm wondering if "Leading the way..." would be considered the motto instead? It's there on the official logos at the official city website and the longer version of "Leading the way as a prosperous diverse regional community" is found on the official city LinkedIn. Both versions are used across a variety of city publications. Thoughts? Pinging  because they removed the "Now Playing" slogan and might have thoughts on adding "Leading the way...". Woodroar (talk) 17:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added this. Woodroar (talk) 22:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto