Talk:Danzig (band)

message: Currently, the article states that I Luciferi is Danzig's darkest album. I disagree, I think Danzig 4 is his darkest. Even Danzig 6, while not nearly as popular, is darker in tone than 777. However, I will agree that 777 has some of his darkest songs, such as The Coldest Sun. Any thoughts?Skullord 23:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Darkest Album?

message: Merge with Samhain ? Discuss.
Although the band Danzig is an evolution of Samhain, I think there's enough distinction between the two bands to warrant them each having their own page. I think most people view the two bands as very different entities. Besides, if we merge Samhain and Danzig, then one could argue that we could merge The Misfits and Samhain. And if that were to happen, then why not merge all three bands with the Glenn Danzig page? Skullord 20:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Why are Black Aria and Black Aria II included in the discography?  Both are solo albums by Glenn and not a band endeavor.  Both are also clearly accounted for on the Glenn Danzig page as solo albums.
I wouldn't object to their removal. Skullord 05:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Aria and other. 

message: So I'm pretty much new to Danzig (I love the Misfits though) but I'm having a problem with their genre. It seems that most people on the internet try not to touch the subject. Here it currently states Heavy Metal (Doom on one album). But it seems to me that they fall square into the alt metal genre. Am I way off? marnues 05:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to whoever changed the genre to include alt metal for me but now I see that what I thought was alternative influence is really just hard rock. So much that I'm not sure if I should even call Danzig a heavy metal band or a hard rock band. marnues 20:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Genre classification is really subjective. Hard Rock and Heavy Metal covers them pretty well. Alt Metal seems to describe bands like Tool and Janes Addiction.Cannibaltom 03:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: :Image:CircleofSnakes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:CircleofSnakes.jpg

message: :Image:Danzig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Danzig.jpg

message: :Image:Danzig Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Danzig Logo.png

message: :Image:Lucifuge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lucifuge.jpg

message: :Image:Lucifuge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lucifuge.jpg

message: :Image:DANZIG logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DANZIG logo.png

message: :Image:Danzig Lineup 1988.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Danzig Lineup 1988.jpg

message: :Image:Girl.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Girl.ogg

message: "Omar Espinosa, former guitarist for post-hardcore band Escape the Fate can be seen wearing a Danzig t-shirt in the music video for the song "Situations." Hey, you must be kidding. Away with it.--80.133.218.84 (talk) 12:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Posting here to avoid a revert war when discussion could solve the issue.  Some trivia sections are arguably necessary for an article, but the one in this article is more trivial than most, which is why I removed it.  It was just recently restored by a user with the rationale that "for a band like Danzig trivia sections are necessary".  However, tidbits like "Samples from "Mother" were used on a 2008 Fox Network television commercial, to promote their new series "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles." aren't even debateable.  They're encyclopedically useless and should be removed.  There's nothing in the entire section that could even maybe, kinda, sorta be integrated into the article.  It's just random, useless junk.  Ford MF (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I entirely agree. That videos have been featured on Beavis and Butthead, for instance is utterly unencyclopedic, as is the appearance of posters in 8mm. The lyric comment is unsourced so needs removing anyway. The use of "Mother" in various games etc. could be incorporated into an article about the song, but not this one. There is basically no way of incorporating the elements of the trivia section into the article, so it needs deleting. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section: a minor RfC 

message: I would also mention Black Metal as a part of Danzig's Genre.The Absolver (talk) 22:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That will most likely be a very debatable subject, since most typical (modern) BM has a very distinct sound that Danzig doesn't quite fall into. However, I do agree with you that back in the 80s Danzig would no doubt be among the darker metal acts, like Mercyful Fate, but probably more in a "proto-Black" fashion. Cyanid (talk) 10:28, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: How about Gothic Metal?  I think Danzig is very much a pioneer of this genre, although it is hard to pinpoint his sound 100%.108.223.14.211 (talk) 04:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre: Gothic Metal 

message: I noticed that the source  in the opening paragraph isn't that well informed. It seems like the author isn't familiar with the bands he's reviewing. To prove my point:
1. When did Danzig become "doom metal"? That implies that Danzig was inspired directly by Trouble, Candlemass, St. Vitus, etc. That's not the case. I've never read any interview of his him admitting to that. He took his inspiration directly from Black Sabbath. (And being inspired by Black Sabbath doesn't make you a doom metal band, either. Cannibal Corpse is directly influenced by Sabbath, for one).
2. About Type O Negative's set: "'She's in Love with Herself' and 'Loving You Is Like Loving the Dead' were also among the wonderfully dreary offerings." Those two aren't TON songs. They're actually two subparts of the band's greatest hit, "Black No. 1". That's like going a Led Zeppelin show in the 1970s and saying that the best song of the set was "All that Glitters is Gold" (instead of "Stairway to Heaven"!) 
3. "Godflesh played a 30-minute, punk-inspired show comprised mostly of songs taken from the recent release "Selfless." How is it that an industrial metal pioneer played a "punk-inspired show"? The mentioned album, Selfless isn't punk rock either.
I'll soon be searching for better sources. Musicaindustrial (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The ''[[Deseret News]]'' throwaway source

message: ===Beginnings (1986-1987)===
From Rick Rubin watching Samhain in the 1986 New Music Seminar to the debut recording on the Less than Zero soundtrack. This section stays the same as the original.
==="Classic" era (1988-1993)===
New Chronology: Danzig (1988) / Danzig II: Lucifuge (1990) / Danzig III: How the Gods Kill (1992) / Thrall - Demonsweatlive (1993).
In other words: from the debut's release to Thrall/Demonsweatlive EP and the sudden success of "Mother".
==="Industrial" era (1994-2001)===
New Chronology: 4p (1994) / Danzig 5: Blackacidevil (1996) / Danzig 6:66 - Satan's Child (1999) / Live On the Black Hand Side (2001).
It seems that most people assume that "Industrial Danzig" started with Blackacidevil. Although subtler, this trend started earlier, on 4p. This record has all the hallmarks of industrial metal. A few examples: the processed vocals on the chorus of "Canstpeak"; the distorted bass drum of "Until You Call On the Dark"; the siren sound effect of "Bringer of Death"; the loops & samples on "Sadistikal" and the dissonant chords on "Dominion" & "Stalker". The fact that 4p with the original line-up's doesn't impact much on Danzig's musical vision; Glenn has always been the sole composer of the band (apart from Rick Rubin's counsel). I'd say that this era ends with the release of Live On the Black Hand Side; the second CD has a live set from the Danzig 6:66 tour.
===Return to form (2002-2011)===
New Cronology: I Luciferi (2002) / Circle of Snakes (2004) / Deth Red Sabaoth (2010).
All these records a "return to the roots", so I believe we can place them together. It ends on 2011 because this was the last year of the Deth Red Sabaoth tour. I think we can collapse Later years (2000–2005) / (2006–2009) into this one section.
===Recent Activity (2012-)===
New Cronography: Sketeletons (2015) / Black Laden Crown (2017) / Danzig Sings Elvis (2020).
Less news on the musical front. Records with original material take longer to release (7 years). Two cover albums, 5 years apart.
:Anyone disagree? Musicaindustrial (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: A New Proposal for the History section

message: New Cronography: Sketeletons (2015) / Black Laden Crown (2017) / Danzig Sings Elvis (2020).
Less news on the musical front. Records with original material take longer to release (7 years). Two cover albums, 5 years apart.
:Anyone disagree? Musicaindustrial (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Activity (2012-)