Talk:Ludwigshafen

message: We have had an email (via Jimbo) pointing out that two of the images on this page are copies of images from http://www.meinestadt.de/ ( and ).   I've removed them as verified copyright problems. -- sannse (talk) 22:44, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article uses a mixture of AmE and BrE spellings and terminology. We should settle on just one variant - suggestions? 81.92.18.58 (talk) 21:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

message: what about the fire where the parent threw a baby out a fourth story window to a policeman below? The baby survived...i want details  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.154.62 (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  baby thrown out window  

message: I think the picture used in the infobox should be a representative one. The former pictures, "playground in Ludwigshafen" or earlier "Bayreuther Straße" aren't such representative ones. So please don't change the "BASF Hochhaus" again, or if, replace it with a picture, wich shows something concisely of Ludwigshafen. BASF is undisputable an important part of Ludwigshafen. --80.140.179.123 (talk) 18:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon reviewing the article, it stinks of lack of NPOV throughout. Kato2k6 (talk) 14:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture in the infobox  

message: I've placed a POV Check request template due to the rather obvious, blatant POV used in a number of places throughout the article.
Parts to be especially reviewed for POV:
:Infobox image (caption and placement)
:History
::Postwar rebuilding
::Financial Crisis
:Districts
::Center
::North
::Gartenstadt
::All images in section (captions and composition)
:Transport (in particular: last two paragraphs)
:Region and Neighbors (very first sentence!)
Kato2k6 (talk) 14:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, yeah, i know the old adage: "When it snows in June, BASF is to blame". However, the information is clearly not displayed in an NPOV way. Kato2k6 (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

text: It does not seem that 10027a is a huge fan of Ludwigshafen - or at least he wasn't back in 2008. I know the city reasonably well and I'd say the changes in the article over the past 6 years have now lead to a description which is pretty accurate - in my humble opinion a bit more accurate than the rant by 10027a above. I don't know if anyone is still following this, but I'd suggest to remove the Neutrality Tag.--109.70.140.238 (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Check 

message: The article says Ludwigshafen would be twinned with Tiszaújváros, Hungary. This town isn't mentioned in the German article or on the homepage of both towns (http://www.ludwigshafen.de/rathaus/partnerstaedte/). Does someone have more information about this or is it wrong? Cattleyard (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually Ludwigshafen-Friesenheim that is twinned with Tiszaújváros. One of the clearer sources for this that I could find is an agenda of the Ortsbeirat Friesenheim in October 2002.  I found a better one with Google which says it started in 1990 and gives some details, but it's a very strange URL.  Fixed it in the article using yet another source. --Hans Adler (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister Towns

message: The photo undertitled "Südweststadion" (south west stadium) under districts / south doesn't show the "Südweststadion" but one of the minor playing grounds beside the "Südweststadion", called "Südwestplatz" (South west place). I changed the undertitle .   
A correct photo of the "Südweststadion" is to be shown later in the article under "Sports" 
--Ausone (talk) 00:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Districts:South, Photo:Südweststadion