Talk:How the West Was Won (film)

message: :Image:How the west was won322.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:How the west was won322.jpg

message: Today the most commonly used wide-screen process is Cinemascope. Vistavision by Paramount is so similar is concept that it will only be mentioned to be complete.  Both are typically 2.35:1 formats that cause movies to be letterboxed on older T.V's.  The 16 X 9 format revision of future T.V.'s will solve most of these transfer problems.
Early Cinerama required 3 interlocked cameras (and 3 playback projectors) to properly film and project it.  After "The Bros. Grimm" and "HTWWW", Cinerama converted to a one camera process.   Many other films were shot in one camera Cinerama:  "2001- A Space Oddessy" being the most notable.  There were only 12 U.S. theatres with true Cinerama.  Processed prints had to be made for wider national release; and yes, even these prints had those anoying "seams".
Todd-AO was another wide screen process.  The most notable film produced in that format was "Around the World in 80 Days". It was an extreme wide screen process without the "seaming" problem. Other 70mm formats became more popular for wide-screen films. They were cheaper. 
It is unfortunate that "How the West Was Won" is a 3 camera film, and there is notable color variation in the 1999 DVD version between the 3 sections. In this DVD is a very good featurette showing the making of (and) explaining  the Cinerama process. 
Remastering this film will probably never happen, so enjoy it...seams and all....
It is a western that seems to have a sense of humor about it; perhaps unintentionally.  The buffalo stampede is still one of the best action scenes I have ever seen in a western film.How the West Was Won-film comment  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.26.231 (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wide Screen Processes: Cinerama Vs. Todd-AO

message: The image :Image:How The West Was Won screenshot.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:How The West Was Won screenshot.png

message: Just a request for information:  Most of the cast names that were listed in the infobox have been deleted, with the explanation that "only major stars" were being left on the list.  John Wayne and Henry Fonda were not "major stars?"  Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in this film. Wayne is only in one scene. Fonda has a larger role, but I didn't see any reason to repeat what's in the cast section. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah.  I see.  They're not major *characters*.  Okay.  I was thinking "these guys are among the biggest stars in the world at the time of this film, how could they not be considered major stars?"  But you're right, despite their major stardom, they don't play major *characters*. Monkeyzpop (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're wasting your breath (and your time). Consensus indeed.--Reedmalloy (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of cast names

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on How the West Was Won (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512134006/http://www.hollywoodheritage.org/newsarchive/spring01/cinerama.html to http://www.hollywoodheritage.org/newsarchive/spring01/cinerama.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141013095312/http://www.prasadgroup.org/downloads/pg-restore-v9-1.pdf to http://www.prasadgroup.org/downloads/pg-restore-v9-1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified