Talk:Polish hussars

message: Disagree. The Polish Hussars were an important formation both historically and curturaly and deserver their own article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Hussars]] 

message: It would be good to look at all the wiki entries that contain information about Hussars. There is more on Polish Hussars tactics here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussars than in this article. And there is also article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towarzysz_husarski - maybe it should be merged into Polish Hussars. Because information about hussars is spread in those three and any of those contains the full information. I suggest, this should be the main article, of course.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.226.91 (talk) 01:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Integrated.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Markus Ramikin (talk) 20:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unification - compatibility 

message: -WHY RIDER IN THE PICTURES WAS CALLED HUSSAR FROM XVI C? tHIS ARMOUR WAS USED IN LATE XVI ANG XVII.i HALF OF XVI WAS TIME OF RACKA JAZDA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.19.195.146 (talk) 09:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right, I'll adjust the caption.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The most famous traity of the Hussar (Polish) are thw ings. I would figure half of the article would be dedicated to it. More information. What was the weight? If heavy, it needed a purpose. Are there accounts of seeing it used in battle? Yes no? This would answer if they were ceremonial or not.
-G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.113.63 (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is the information so poor concerning the wings?

message: The polish hussars are not the only unit, that used accessories like the wings to show the ememy "here are we,the elite". The experiments carried, that the wings are no handicap in battle. Look to the cavelery in the Naopleon wars, they used uniforms, that make it impossible to sit in it. How can you fight in it? But we dont discuss about it today, how could the french or british fight in that big hats. Second is, that the tactics are much more complicated, than only to run into the enemy. Third is, that the serbs invented the first hussar formation as a light cavalery in the 15th century and fought in hungarian armies against the turcks and later also in the polish-lituanian armies. In the 16th century hussars were used in the whole centraleast europe. The polish hussars developed since 1580 to a heavy-storm unit, The hungarians gave up this idea after 1660 and went back to the roots. The light hungarian hussars were used in the 18th century in most western armies. The polish tradition to break through cavelery and infantery formations was continued by Ulans...in england called lancers)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.5.146.89 (talk • contribs) 08:29, February 19, 2009 
2 things from me: horses did NOT have armor; Karacena became popular because of growing turkish influences- those were heavier, more expensive and were giving worse protection then cuirass, but were more... fashionable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.2.87 (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: protest note

message: i dont know much about polish history but the deaths head hussars were a 18/19thth century prussian unit. the polish may have had a "deaths head" regiment too, but the picture shown in the article is definitely a prussian one. the cross there is an iron cross, something that no polish soldier would have worn, since it not only originates in the teutonic order that suppressed the polish for centuries, but by then was official insignia of the german army.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.219.218.83 (talk) 16:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  deaths head hussars?? 

message: Description of the picture reads: Polish-Lithuanian hussars sword. It is not sword but sabre. Even original file name is "File:Szabla husarska GIM.jpg". Szabla = saber  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.79.31.138 (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A sabre is a sword. So a Hussar's sabre is therefore also a Hussar's sword.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.44.180.166 (talk) 08:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: It is not really sword

message: Hello,
I have spotted an inconsistency in the article and its referred articles.  The opening paragraph states that the Polish hussars were "were one of the main types of Polish cavalry in the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland and in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth between the 16th and 18th centuries" but then states that they were "Modeled on the Hungarian Hussars".  In the linked article on Hungarian Hussars, it states that Hungarian hussars "madde up the cavalry of the Austro-Hungarian Army from 1867 to 1918".  
It seems therefore that the Polish hussars were formed 2-3 centuries before the formation of the Hungarian hussars and so could not have been modelled on them.  Indeed, it seems from the article that the Polish hussars were disbanded before the formation of the Hungarian hussars.
I am not knowledgeable about either subject so I have not attempted to correct, perhaps someone here can advise?
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.52.216.130 (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed linkinh.(KIENGIR (talk) 18:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline query - which came first, Polish or Hungarian hussars?