lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Queen Victoria Market

message: Is there a source for the removal of the disinterred statement (that only 10% of the former cemetery was disinterred)?? Citizen D 00:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got the new Encyclopedia of Melbourne on my Christmas list. Hopefully I'll be able to confirm this information in a few weeks. :) Cnwb 00:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be the source of many new Melbourne additions here I would hope.  Dropped hints for my copy but nothing confirmed from family OR friends :(.  Interesting to find out though simply because I find it hard to believe that most bodies would not be relocated, even in the 19th century. Citizen D 03:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Cemetery 

message: Can someone please explain to me why a small, 200 odd word article that has reference to a print encyclopedia, and an official website for the subject has a banner asking for more references for validation?  This textbox/banner should be removed until the article expands and more information is introduced (a lot more in my opinion) Citizen D 21:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification? 

message: I'm not sure how to use this reference or where to put it, so il just leave it here
*Brown-May, Andrew & Swain, Shurlee (2005) The Encyclopedia Of Melbourne. Cambridge University Press. 
Chumchum14 (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just add it in under the References section exactly as you've done here. Citizen D (talk) 00:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But there is no inline citation, i don't know where the references actually cites in the article. Chumchum14 (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference added. Citizen D (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just copy another reference from another article, that's what I still do. Aaroncrick  (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: The lead is rather biased and isn't very 'encyclopaedic' in its tone. I would fix it but no-one else seems to have pointed it out. Deonyi (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Dramaturgical perspective

message: Dramaturgical perspective
I don't know about you, but seeing as how I use to be an actor this part of sociology really pisses me off. Those roles are subject to what is in theater termed "breaking character." I'm sorry son, but breaking characters happens on stage in front of your audience. Behind stage you're creating your character. Breaking character happens during the production. I don't really think this guy understood drama at all. He probably just made up the term dramaturgy to look cool. He was probably just an audience member and never a real actor. Perhaps stagehand. --Cyberman 01:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

message: shouldnt this topic be unified with Dramaturgy_(sociology)?
--Brendan642 00:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  unify with dramaturgy (sociology)
Talk:Boris Mikšić

message: One paragraph begins "In 2005 he ran".  Should this be "In 2004 he ran" instead?  162.84.72.171 01:42, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lake Drummond

message: Wouldn't a link for Tropozone and/or Satellite image (such as Google Maps) be appropriate?
Surely the USGS or the State has done some research on the region. Some references would be good. Dave 19:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Marge on the Lam

message: I created a new summary (see Marge on the Lam/Temp), based solely on my recollections of this great episode. Probably should mention the babysitting lawyer as well, but it's a start.... Turnstep 01:45, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: What is the name of the song playing in the disco where Mayor Quimby was topless?
86.136.130.148 23:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Music

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 13, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Some minor style and grammar errors, but I corrected them.
:2. Factually accurate?: Article appears to be accurate.
:3. Broad in coverage?: Article sees to cover all aspects.
:4. Neutral point of view?: No evidence of a POV.
:5. Article stability? No evidence of edit-wars.
:6. Images?: Image is given fair-use rationale. You may want to use the Non-free use rational template.
  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.</div>— ISD (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: Where (or better when) is the scene where Quimby daces toples?
In the "Reception" paragraph it says somethinbg about MArge letting down her hair. When does that happen in this episode? -78.51.66.98 (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 questions
Talk:The Trouble with Love Is

message: The title of this single is "The Trouble with Love Is". Yet every line of the tables reminds us that the title of the single is "The Trouble with Love Is". I now read "The Trouble with Love Is" eight times in one screenful. This column of the table(s) seems utterly superfluous. Is there some reason why I shouldn't delete it? -- Hoary 06:47, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I say be bold :) Wyss 08:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is good reason to leave it the way it is. Many times, remixes or alternative versions chart of the same song. Like for instance  We Belong Together has three different versions of the song charting. It would be misleading to erase the song's title and leave the remix portion of the song unknown. This happens in many other singles too. And sometimes, remixes can't be expressed by a title in parentheses, but a full subtitle (which would be misleading without the full title). OmegaWikipedia 10:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In We Belong Together, it makes sense (though even there it seems rather laborious). In The Trouble with Love Is, however, no alternative (or augmented) title is used. How about adding this column IFF there's some variety among the titles? -- Hoary 10:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

text: A few singles sections I edited did not contain the title of the song. I completely agree with omitting them from the article, however OmegaWikipedia is right, as well. It can be misleading. Winnermario 21:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Single title in the tables

message: I came to this article to understand when and how this song was written, and what relationship there is to the music-video version and the movie Love Actually. I leave without knowing the answers. It seems clear that the song was written and first recorded independent of the movie. And obviously the music video was made in association with the movie. Is the audio completely straight original, or re-done somehow for the video? What was the nature of the business relationship, to tie the video to the movie?-71.174.190.122 (talk) 01:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  music-video version & movie Love Actually 
Talk:Garçon à la pipe

message: I wish these painting articles had more discussions of the artwork itself, rather than their monetary worth (see the most of the List of most expensive paintings to see what I'm talking about) - can we please talk about the painting's technique, or influence? Why, for example, is it worth so much money in the first place? I'm no art expert, so I'm not going to try to add this, but I came to the page in hopes of finding out. I wish someone who knew better than me would add this information. 71.206.196.59 03:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Norfolk Southern Railway (1942–1982)

message: Why is this "Norfolk Southern Railway (1942-1982)"? From the history is seems that it started in 1870 and was the Norfolk Southern Railway or Railroad from 1883 until 1982. I might understand the title better if the article only covered the period after 1942, but that isn't the case. Ferritecore (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A year later and the title is still misleading. Perhaps it should be changed to "Norfolk Southern Railway (historic)". Any comments? --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just came here, 13 years later, to say I thought the exact same thing. 198.212.199.195 (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Henry Perky

message: Does anybody know the name of the book by Scott Perky about his father? Thanks very much  --Mooksterk (talk) 22:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book? 

message: I recognize that the article is still under construction, but it seems to have a faintly encyclopedic or biographical ring to it. Could you possibly list your sources? Thanks in advance. IceKarmaॐ 02:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 
Talk:Foo fighter

message: Ah, yes, of course. 24.34.85.65 (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is your comment meant to be saying something about our article? SpinningSpark 14:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Simply reflections of light from ice crystals" 

message: You state that senator Stevens saw an UFO when flying over Europe during WWII.
But according another page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stevens
Stevens was active in China, not in Europe. So this information is false.
-- luxorion  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:7E8:C41D:F301:585B:764B:6A66:E268 (talk) 20:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed reference to where it was because the source doesn't specify.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction : Ted Steven's Sighting ? 

message: Was the phenomenon that was witnessed on August 10, 1944 in Indonesia can be counted as the first Foo Fighters sighting in Indonesia ?
http://www.betaufo.org/sightings/palembang1944.html (found the information about the sighting from here) Alvaro Ivan Daniswara 2017 (talk) 13:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A small little question
Talk:Mile Krajina

message: This essentially just repeats the mention at Music of Croatia I see. I put the name in a search engine and asked it not to give any results with the words "wiki" or "Wikipedia." Well perhaps someone who reads Croatian can expand it. Anyone known a Croatian speaking Wikipedean?--T. Anthony 02:45, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Saxophone Embouchure

message: I'm going to help you out on this one.  This article has some information that is seen by many as an incorrect way to address saxophone embouchure.  Because there are a variety of ways that this can be taught, this article needs to be more general and address these steps as merely guidelines for approaching the topic.--Jfulkerson 03:03, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

message: The standards are still not high enough and I think there are probably better ways of explaining the process for the purposes of an encyclopedia.  But I think this update may be on the right track.--Jfulkerson 03:17, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuation needed
Talk:Jabal

message: 30-Oct-2008: All the variations of words Jabal, Jabel, Jebel, Jbel, Djebel, Jibal, etc. have been used for the Arabic word meaning "mountain, hill or slope" (as elevations).  Some places or mountains have been named by either of the multiple spellings, and so I have joined all together on this one disambiguation page.
Considering the growing revision count (of edits-per-page), I believe that using this single disambiguation page will foster far fewer multiple edits (revisions) than having separate disambiguation pages for each various spelling. I think separate pages would elevate total edits among the pages, trying to move terms (from page to page) closer to each spelling, or actually repeating the same term on several of the multiple pages, in case someone didn't read the other pages.  Plus, there was no obvious direct meaning to assign to each term, many of which had 100,000 or 200,000 Google hits with "mountain" naming several different mountains.
The spelling that seemed most rare was "Jbel" (Google hits=7250), but it was clearly tied to several mountains in Morocco, such as Jbel Toubkal (Jebel Toubkal), Jbel Mgoum, Jbel Sahro/Saghro, Jbel Kamanja, Jbel Bouhalla, Jbel Sirwa, etc.
Of course, if the decision changes in the future, then any of the spellings can be split into new disambiguation pages, copying the related text from this page. -Wikid77 (talk) 03:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Using for Jabal/Jabel/Jebal/Jebel/Jbel/Djebel
Talk:Big Daddy (1999 film)

message: Who played "The man with the old balls"? Karrmann 23:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm wondering 

message: There is a definite attack on the writers in the bottom of the second section
69.39.17.119 (talk) 01:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Why does Scuba steve redirect to this article? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 04:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scuba Steve 

message: Evie actually caught a good Huge big daddy idea and big daddy.Kirby said that Grombie and Evie says um I'm I love you Kirby the I dotto.kirby laugh at Evie and when Cashew was keeps scaring Evie and Kirby! Cashew ran away Crying And she was crossing her arms 160.3.165.253 (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evie's special big daddy Ohio day!
Category talk:History by city

message: Hi SimonP. I was just going to go ahead and put this on Cfr, but I thought I'd discuss it here first. I feel the name of this category is erroneous as most of its contents do not in fact cover municipal history; rather, they cover metropolitan area history. I think it should be renamed History by city - for ambiguity. Alternatively, this category could be kept for actual municipal history.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By my definition a "municipality" is any local political unit, and those listed here all meet this definition.  Dividing histories by political unit is standard on Wikipedia. History by country, history by state or province, is the norm. City also has its own problems. Tokyo, for instance, is not a city, it is a group of prefectures under a metropolitan government. This would also exclude any towns or smaller entities that could be placed in the more general municipal category. Could you give an example of what you would expect in an article on "municipal history?" I would expect the same as one would find in an article on a history of country: full coverage of political, social and economic history, which is what the articles here listed already are. - SimonP 04:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Could you point out some items in the subcats that would be part of city histories but not municipal histories? Country history categories are fine with including events that occurred outside their borders, e.g. the Battle of the Bulge is in the American history tree. They also normally contain events that occurred in the region before the modern political entity was created or controlled that area, such as many of the articles in :Category:History of Germany. This might be a national difference. In Canada city has a very specific meaning, while municipality refers very generally to any sub-provincial level of government. - SimonP 05:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Israeli hip hop

message: What about him? in a show about him they interviewd Shi, Subliminal, Liron Esek Shahor and many more and all said he was the one who brought the colture here...
Can anyone elaborate on that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.217.1 (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nigel HaAdmor

message: "Shay 360" should be "Shi 360" - it stands for "Supreme Hebrew Intellect" User:TooJewForYou
Why was this moved here?  "hip hop" is two words. Tuf-Kat 03:48, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Easy to fix, which I did. — FREAK OF NURxTURE ([ TALK]) 01:33, Jan. 21, 2006
Yes, I know Wikipedia is geared toward the laymen (or layperson if you prefer), but this article should at least look more professional. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.210.109.220 (talk) 04:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Un-titled entries

message: The link in Other known hip hop crews and rappers for Athena is wrong.  It currently links to the Greek goddess of wisdom. Not knowing who Athena is I am not going to remove the entry but I will remove the link.  There is a link to Athena (band), a Turkish ska punk band. on the Athena Disambiguation page, but this does not seem to be the correct link to me so will not add it to the article. Dbiel (Talk) 08:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Athena

message: "Israeli rappers, on the other hand, have a more conscious style to their lyrics [than American rappers]."  Hardly neutral POV, this is a value judgment and cultural aggrandizing.  Fundamentally, no categorical difference can be isolated concerning the lyrical substance of the entire body of hip-hop in two cultures.  Modify, perhaps one should note the difference between the American rap that manages to get marketed in Israel and the entire corpus of American rap, or acknowledge differences in cultural context. At the very least, show sensitivity to the divide between mainstream/independent music marketing, or (even better) drop this point altogether.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.77.200 (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral POV?

message: *Potentially Malicious Domain:
*hxxp://www.ruthfilms.com/
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/8a6b6e74be8015dc2e63c06717e01292605b7cad624c19091197ecb38bde616b/analysis/1373885327/
*HTML:
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/9754f6735a5dc857ed94688e26b3c9b7e888d2774d9eadfea03b291ef5954280/analysis/1373887109/
*Microsoft Internet Explorer remote code execution via option element
*http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3758343
*http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3758190
*hxxp://www.ruthfilms.com/the-film-class.html
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/97f1bceee3fd50da614f1938bd7f996a80b2006ead1fa08924096b7e56410d5a/analysis/
*ALSO:
*Magento version outdated. Risk being vulnerable
--Gary Dee 11:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware Link Removal
Talk:Dry drunk

message: The entire article requires revision. It's poorly sourced, badly written and seems less an objective description than some sort of commercial for AA. In short, it represents all that is wrong about Wiki. 86.158.122.137 (talk) 20:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It should also include the perspective of their Families, usually seeking help in Al-Anon and Adult Children of Alcoholics. 172.116.38.91 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced  

message: The very first sentence of the article says that this is a “controversial” term. Yet no where in the article does it explain or address what “controversy” there is. Clearly from the talk page, people don’t like the tone or information presented in this article. Someone should be bold and edit this article to explain the “controversy”. (I have no familiarity with the topic so can’t do that bold editing myself.) 2600:1700:975E:E000:6D95:3C0C:FA27:2B66 (talk) 07:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial?
Talk:Port Angeles, Washington

message: Is there any source for the second city designation? I find it really hard to believe. --Rschen7754 03:48, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, I think the entry should be rewritten so as not to imply it's actual fact that Port Angeles is the backup national capital. --Lukobe 04:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Second city

message: The second par leads with the stunning revelation that Port Angeles was the birthplace of a footballer!! Despair.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.56.38 (talk) 08:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Really?

message: I'm thinking that the History and Public Schools sections ought to be moved to the top, above the climate data, and the newly renamed "Crime" section should be moved to the bottom, possibly as "Controversies" or "Controversies and Crime". In any event, this re-org would bring it a little more in line with the formatting of other similar articles. besiegedtalk 18:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: . What about the history section? Shouldn't that be near the top? Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: . Spot on. besiegedtalk 07:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organization of sections 
Talk:Micronauts

message: I'm going to be bold and remove the expansion tag (this article is HUGE), and I'd like to suggest that any wikipedians coming here take a page from Transformers and make seperate articles for the comics and the toys (that is, assuming there's that much to be said about the toys). --InShaneee 23:40, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing expansion tag 

message: This section is missing the Micronauts' appearances on Robot Chicken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.35.181.207 (talk) 23:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reminder, 71.35.181.207. Was going to add that and just did; detailed info on the Robot Chicken Micronauts reference has been added to the popular culture section. --SpyMagician (talk) 02:07, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to popular culture section
Talk:Tin(II) oxide

message: Someone with knowledge of chemistry and grammar should update this page.--67.124.89.246 04:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added more content and restructured the article. However there are Uses noted that I cannot substantiate- if anyone has references regarding glass making, glazing or similar that would help, as well a reference for the esterification statement.--Axiosaurus (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses 

message: I've tried to edit this so the sentences made sense, but in their previous form they seemed very ambiguous. I can't seem to find any information about the complexes formed in acidic solutions, so I've edited it the way I believed it was meant to be written. If anyone with more information than me believes it to be incorrect now, please alter it.
80.254.146.36 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amphoteric character 

message: *
--Stone (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref for History

message: I added the picture of burning tin(II) oxide. I may be able to get a better picture by sticking it on a copper wire and heating. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 19:16, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of flame