Talk:Western painting

message: This article is undergoing a major change concerning imagery per ...Modernist (talk) 13:33, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image overhaul

message: A template was added to the top of the page claiming excessive or improper use of copyrighted material. The editor who placed the template should indicate which images are excessive and which copyrighted material is being improperly used. Otherwise, the template should be removed. freshacconci talktalk 18:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It could have something to do with the unacceptably high number of fair use images on the page. I'd certainly say that's a damn good reason for the tag. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to explain why the number of FU images is unacceptable, given that virtually all images from the recent period will be in copyright, and the visual nature of the subject, and explain what you think would be an acceptable number to adequately illustrate the period, and why. Believe it or not, this issue has often been discussed before - see the archive. Johnbod (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Jan van Eyck 091.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Lascaux-aurochs.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:JuanGris.Portrait of Picasso.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Apparatus and hand.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Apparatus and hand.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Apparatus and hand.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: The image of that Stuart Davis painting is not in use in the gallery or in the article for that matter...Modernist (talk) 13:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Davis

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Western painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071106102251/http://www.whistler.arts.gla.ac.uk:80/biog/Dura_P.htm to http://www.whistler.arts.gla.ac.uk/biog/Dura_P.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've rerated this from B to C class, which is arguably a bit flattering - the text is never great, and often downright bad. Will those adding to the galleries please note that where a painting has its own article, this should be linked in the caption. Most in the galleries do, and we should give a strong preference to those with decent articles to link to. Johnbod (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rerated; Galleries need links

message: Stop removing visual art imagery. The paintings all have fair use rationales and must be seen; and left alone...Modernist (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Image removal

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Western painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070319123717/http://www.accd.edu/sac/vat/arthistory/arts1303/Rome4.htm to http://www.accd.edu/sac/vat/arthistory/arts1303/Rome4.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211173809/http://www.bartleby.com/65/co/CounterR.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/co/CounterR.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081017051233/http://jasonkaufman.com/articles/stuart_davis_american_modernist.htm to http://www.jasonkaufman.com/articles/stuart_davis_american_modernist.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080925010715/http://www.guggenheimcollection.org/site/artist_work_md_109_7.html to http://www.guggenheimcollection.org/site/artist_work_md_109_7.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313213644/http://www.beyondbooks.com/art11/index.asp to http://www.beyondbooks.com/art11/index.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: I'm interested as to where this exact date came from. Wanting help finding where this date came from. Tyrone Madera (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cueva de las Manos c. 550 BC? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The balance of this article is absolutely terrible. The section on the twentieth century takes up almost half the article. Several individual sections of the twentieth century portion are larger than the entire section on the renaissance. In no possible telling of the history of art is that a reasonable allocation of space. Hochithecreator (talk) 01:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article balance