Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/LSLM

message: I will just say a couple of things and that is it. I will not respond anymore.  Some of the assertions above are just false. Pay good attention to them. Still, Just make a follow up of this guy (and others of his team). He has had already several problems with users because they accuse him of being a Nazi
(an ideology not an insult, although the ideology is not good that it is used as an insult). He has already been in this type of conflict for the same reason with users Alun, Sugaar and Psycohistorian, at least that I know of. They all told him what he is: A Nazi manipulating Wiki for his agenda. You can find all those conflicts in his personal page, although he makes a big effort to hide it all the time, like his friend DarkT.
Plenty of examples you will find also in the white people article, but not only there. 
I had problems with him before for the same reason, because I denounce Nazi manipulation in Wiki and will continue to do so although I am thinking on taking a vacation by now. Good luck. I am looking forward to seeing if he and his team fool you again. Cheers. Veritas et Severitas 18:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

message: and the response from Wobble: . Of course "Wanna...wanna...learn to spell....." is definately not the worst thing he has said, but given his history, I'm surprised that he felt the need to harass me on someone else's page after a note not directed at him.  Lukas19 23:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ummmm, unless I'm very much mistaken, this RfC is not about me. Am I not allowed to express my opinion? What's the point of a Request for comment if no comment is allowed to be expressed? And if one makes a comment, does that automatically mean that any opinion they express is automatically rendered void just because they disagree with one of the parties involved in starting the RfC? This is an RfC againt LSLM, but it would be unfair not to examine the background to this RfC. Behaviour is rarely spontaneous, especially in these sorts of circumastances. We are not talking about someone telling someone else just to "fuck off" here. I'd like to point out that I have had serious personal attacks against me, so I know what it means, but even then I actually did not report the person to AN/I or PAIN, and it was massively more serious than this sort of puny crap.    I've been here for some nearly two years, and I've had real personal attacks and seen real vandalism, and this is accusation not only pathetic, is the worst waste of time there is or ever could be. The solution is to tell Lukas19 this, Go and get a better thing to complain about, being a sad white guy does not automatically make you king of the hill these days Alun 00:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This must be how I provoke other editors (!!)

message: Look at Lukas's conduct right now at the white people's article. Look at the history. I just made that contribution because I know his tactics and I knew he would engage again in an edit war: If any information relating genetics points out relationships among Europeans and Non-Europeans clearly, like in a map, he runs and deletes it constantly. He does not care whether the information is reliable and verifiable. He will respond with his usual sophistry and monotonous style and impose himself as the owner of that article (I think he does the same in other articles). Again, look and judge for yourselves. Veritas et Severitas 23:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lukas behaviour 

message: Seems Lukas has decided that RfCs are the best way to "punish" those naughty boys who disagree with him.    Alun 07:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More RfCs

message: The user who is the subject of this RfC has now been banned from editing Wikipedia for one year by decision of the Arbitration Committee. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM. This RfC can be archived. Newyorkbrad 21:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned