lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Švenčionys

message: Mentioned 161 years after it was granted city rights? Cmapm 00:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank s for cathing. Renata 00:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No title

message: Can someone who knows how to do it put some space between the population table and the text? Sca (talk) 22:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, Renata (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Aciu. That was quick! Sca (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Leading
Talk:Thirty Mile Zone

message: Thirty Mile Zone is a term mainly created by TMZ to promote their brand.  Studio Zone is the actual correct term used throughout the entertainment industry since the 60's.  Anyone who actually works in the film/tv industry knows this.  If you call SAG, the DGA and any line producer and ask them which term is used, they will say "studio zone".  It is called "studio zone" in the union contracts.  No one in Los Angeles calls it the thirty mile zone.  If you walked on a set and used that term, they'd know you just got "off the bus" from Podunk, USA.
This Thirty Mile Zone page seems to be part of a TMZ PR campaign.  Each time an accurate Studio Zone page is created on Wikipedia, someone goes and deletes it.  Could it be TMZ?  Perhaps.  Who else would care?
For clarification, there is no legally defined term "Thirty Mile Zone" in any of the union agreements, but there is a legally defined term "Studio Zone".  No one in Hollywood utters the phrase "thirty mile zone" except entertainment industry outsiders who read gossip on TMZ.
-----
There has recently been a battle of sorts here on Wikipedia regarding this page and the Studio Zone page. There is an active campaign by three people to have Studio Zone re-directed or "merged" to this page.  Accurate information on both this entry and the Studio Zone entry has been maliciously deleted, including comments on the discussion page, which should be sacred.   
This Thirty Mile Zone page seems to be part of a TMZ PR campaign.  Each time an accurate Studio Zone page is created on Wikipedia, someone goes and deletes it.  Could it be TMZ?  Perhaps.  Who else would care?
For clarification, there is no legally defined term "Thirty Mile Zone" in any of the union agreements, but there is a legally defined term "Studio Zone".  No one in Hollywood utters the phras "thirty mile zone" except TMZ, the entity that created it.  The phrase "thirty mile zone" is a brand created by AOL/Warner Bros and Telepictures, Inc. (all who run TMZ), it is not the 45+ year old term used in the entertainment industry, which is again "studio zone".
Any redirection of this page to or merging with Thirty Mile Zone must be questioned. All deletions to the discussion page should also be questioned.  Why delete a discussion?  Accuracy should be treasured here on Wikipedia.  "Thirty mile zone" is not accurate, it is a brand/campaign.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Planetprods (talk • contribs) 15:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Chesebrough

message: Someone should clarify how Chesebrough began his career as a chemist... since, from my reading, kerosene is not clarified from whale oil... rather, kerosene is clarified from petroleum, and was a cheaper competitor to whale oil.You might clarify lamp oil from whale oil, perhaps. No?
Yeah, someone with a severe misunderstanding of the physical world wrote that sentence — kerosene can absolutely NOT be refined from whale oil — it is strictly petroleum-based. *facepalm* And yes, whale oil was widely used for lamp oil until the raw ingredients and better refining processes for kerosene became readily available, especially with the advent of oil drilling.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.158.138.182 (talk) 08:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemist bio
Talk:Little Hiawatha

message: " ...eight months, from November 10, 1940 to July 12, 1942."
That is not eight months.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CA10:18A0:6577:E071:E7D7:5990 (talk) 01:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eight months?
Talk:Carnival (Natalie Merchant song)

message: There is a big story in this song that is missing re Jennifer Turner - her growling rythnm and sonic leads with the guitar in this song are extrodinary - and created tension between her and Natalie.  At 18, Jenn played well beyond her years - but she made this song 73.228.240.68 (talk) 04:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jennifer Turner
Talk:Shirahama Kenki

message: I have taken a stab at the kanji, my best guess. Google search has yielded no results that might help to indicate which kanji for "kenki" would be a common samurai name. I have thus given his name as　剣鬼, "devilish swordsman", as the result of an out-of-nowhere guess that it might be more of a description than a name. Devilish swordsman could be the kind of name either taken on, or bestowed upon, a pirate raider sort. If anyone knows better, please fix this. LordAmeth 08:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have since found a primary source for the name. LordAmeth (talk) 16:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kanji
Talk:Nation of Domination

message: Please do not post inflammatory comments. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thomas Yen 00:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

message: It was more a splinter spinoff. The WWF version started with Farooq, then PG-13, who were in both, started up the the USWA branch.99.149.166.148 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  USWA branch wasn't before the WWF branch 

message: There's fancruft, original research and possibly some completely inaccuracies (see comment above) in the article. Some of the sources are total crap. I don't have time to do this myself right now but I'll look into it in the next couple of days, time permitting. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 05:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I just started reading this article, and what you're saying is still true 3 years later. Feedback ☎ 11:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting and resourcing needed
Talk:Venmx

message: Sites I have found about VenMX:
official website http://venmx.org/
St Johns Wood Venturers Mainly photos
Queensland Venturers Photos / message board
Mentioned briefly in ScoutAbout Magazines
Maybe an entry on similar activities (Venturer Scout hikes / Initiative activities in Queensland). 
For example:
Nighthawk
Operation Archer
Urban Challenge
--RobBrisbane 00:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability ?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Systems Engineering Initiative/Archive 3

message: In the Wikipedia:WikiProject Systems/List of Systems Engineering Images#Systems Engineers one of the images have been removed, , with the message:  
* (cur) (last)  07:22, 15 May 2007 Gnome (Bot)|Gnome (Bot)(Talk | contribs) m (7,644 bytes) (Bot: replacing Image:Brian Mar.jpg with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg... see our non-free content policy) 
I wonder what is going on here - Mdd 12:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images removed - 15 May 2007
Talk:Charlie Brown (The Coasters song)

message: Leiber and Stoller wrote this song in 1959, well before Peanuts had reached its peak of cultural infusion, so there's little reason to suspect a connection between the strip and the song, especially considering the nature of the behavior ascribed to the character in the song.  At no time in the development of "Peanuts" would Charlie Brown "walk in the classroom cool and slow" and call the English teacher "Daddy-O".  L&S are describing the behavior of a high-school cut-up and wanna-be hipster, which in no way connects to the Peanuts character.  It's possible, of course, that they ripped off the name from the strip, but absent some evidence of this, even tentatively suggesting a connection isn't worthwhile. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk/cont) 21:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could have been and was otherwise, according to the songwriters, and I should think they'd know. Also, as Ed points out above, if you read the lyrics and compare the characterization of the Charlie Brown character in the song to the one portrayed in the Peanuts strip, it's pretty clear that they have nothing to do with each other. Pstoller (talk) 22:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Like I said Peanuts was the number one strip in American in 1959. Leiber and Stoller would have been familiar with the NAME, everyone who was into popular culture knew the name Charlie Brown. At least the NAME was ripped off and every kid in the 1960s pretty much thought that it was referencing you know whoEricl (talk) 00:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The popularity of Peanuts is factual. The assertions that the name "Charlie Brown" was "ripped off" and of what "every kid in the 1960s pretty much thought" are not. You're entitled to believe what you wish, but that has no bearing on the content of the article. Pstoller (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is certainly quite possible for other creative minds to come up with the name Charlie Brown (as witness this poem Drunken Charlie Brown from 1871), much as Schulz was using a dog named Snoopy when there were at least two books out with a dog named Snoopy in the title. If this is to be mentioned in the article at all, it should have good source... and a source quoting Lieber or Stoller denying the link would be a great one, if we have it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added Jerry Leiber's account of how the song was written. It describes arriving at the name of the character as the end-product of a week of brainstorming rather than being inspired by any outside source. Pstoller (talk) 04:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peanuts 

message: "...the first of three top-ten hits that year."  Is unclear.  First of three for whom? The Coasters? L&S?  As worded it sounds like there were only three all year, and that can't be right. 
130.85.194.43 (talk) 20:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other
Category talk:Disused railway stations in Coventry

message: This category is a companion to , for the disused railway stations.<BR>It is part of a drive to correctly categorise the railway stations in the West Midlands by area.<BR>Although it may be empty at present, it is in the course of being populated (so please do not mark it for deletion!)
EdJogg 00:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Initially empty category
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Systems Engineering Initiative/Archive 2

message: Before we proceed, I propose we take some time, say a week, to gather some more different perspectives and expert opinions on systems engineering and the current article. So I like to invite expert here to give their perceptions on this situation. - Mdd 09:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some more expert opinions 

message: Within the Systems Engineering images I uploaded I found one scheme, that gives a detailled plan for improvement.  
Off cause we know this is a ordinairy example of what Systems Engineering offers. The improvement we seek is seen as one whole, as one process, in which we can determine three steps. 
For Systems Engineers this is allmost to ordinary to mention. But recent discussion, see  made me realize, that young people don't associate the systems approach with the systems theory... They probably won't associate this ordinary image with systems engineering. Maybe this is a thing the SE article should stipulate also. - Mdd 12:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An image
Talk:Heart of New England Council

message: I will be adding more later brendon 00:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More later

message: I added a history section about the camp. I recommend adding to it, if anyone wants to, especially those who were part of that history. I will attempt to improve the section as I learn more. -71.245.235.123 (talk) 02:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to Camp Wanocksett Page
Talk:Nanjing Road

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Weak support - one of the few cases where a generic sounding road name really is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. On the other hand, confirming to the user/searcher they've found the Nanjing Road they were probably looking for isn't so terrible. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted, done. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Histmerge  by Anthony Appleyard -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 09:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Line 5 (Shanghai Metro)

message: The page currently has, for the extension to Fengxian District:
: construction is expected to end in 2017
Is that part of the line now in service? If so, this article, the district article and voy:Shanghai/Fengxian all need revisions. Pashley (talk) 04:13, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fengxian
Talk:Oroya fever

message: Since Oroya fever is simply the febrile stage of bartonellosis, I'm being bold and merging the contents of this article into the Bartonellosis article. -- MarcoTolo 01:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So what happened?  Did someone revert this change?  WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0

message: I KNOW this page is going to be CSD'd because of the subject matter and because the page has been deleted three times already. But I request that you stop and think. Last time it was nonsense content. This time I actually made an article. The only problem I can see is in my second reference, which states that Wikipedia also adopted the "screw you, sue me" stance described in the article. I wonder at why this page is nonexistant then. If it is because the stance has changed, then I must comment at the fickleness of Wikipedia admins and welcome you to CSD this article. W1k13rh3nry 01:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: CSD has happened. Go figure. "The given reason is: It was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) discussion. (CSD G4)" However, I must note that this article is not at all similar to the previous articles created here, as is needed to CSD for this reason. W1k13rh3nry 01:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

text: First article: "#REDIRECT HD DVD#Muslix64's exploit" Second article: "Revolution!" Third article: "09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0" This article: An actual article W1k13rh3nry 01:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Redirect per WP:Nobility? FINE. W1k13rh3nry 10:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Queso Chihuahua

message: Seems biased to me, many people may not agree that one specific place makes the best Queso Chihuahua.
This is a registed Trademark for a Chicago based cheese manufacturer V&V Supremo Foods, Inc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.61.215 (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed a section
Talk:Matt Bai

message: Mr. Bai writes seminal articles for Time? Who's the author of this piece, Mrs. Bai? Erik (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Seminal?

message: Bai tilts in very pronounced fashion to the Left.   Sure, so do most of most "journalists," but Bai works for Yahoo News where nearly 100 percent of articles are anti-Trump in orientation rather than simply "news" conveying information in a neutral manner about the world.   So a fair, objective article would merely note that Bai has a very particular ideological slant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.216.213 (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The article doesn't say much at all.  Bai is another ideological warrior in the press who prefers the party line over objective reality.  Whether Wikipedia finds that "notable" is something else. 83.20.186.186 (talk) 06:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also Need Something on his Weltbild 
Talk:Demon Bear

message: This article is missing information on the character's publication history and appearances and references in other media. The former being extremely important as it tells the history of the character and gives the article its encyclopedic tone that is Wikipiedia's standard. These should be added to the article in order for it to meet Wikipiedia's standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information and Expansion 

message: I think this article is a good source of introduce about the monster in that mortal film.It is completely and well explained.However some element was also lack and can not be fully explained.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yiding wang (talk • contribs) 23:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluate the article
Talk:Sustainable city/draft

message: # A proposal for a clean-slate city-state.]
#Pearce, Fred. "Ecopolis Now". New Scientist Magazine. 17 June 2006.  (subscription required)
# Paul Downton: "Ecopolis Now" 
#"Ecopolis Architects". 
# Sociopolis Master Plan (2005-2007) 
# Arup: Dongtan Eco-city, Shanghai, China 
es:Ecociudad
de:Stadtentwicklung
ko:생태도시
--END OF FIRST DRAFT--
I'm already going to upload it into the article I created a while ago (sustainable city). If the draft is approved to be able to merge the other articles (ecocity and ecopolis), I'll delete those and put on the redirects.
KVDP (talk) 10:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Deichkind

message: I've been searching for some good English sources however I've noticed they are very few and far separated for topics such as foreign bands.  However, I've only translated a stub from German; and the German article has no sources either. akuyumeTC 01:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found various webpages listing them with WEA International, a branch of WMG.   Not too official but a start...akuyumeTC 02:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I've added two references as of now and will continue to search more, particularly those along the lines of WP:RS.  I can predict the arguments for the Myspace reference however in my humble opinion an official MySpace band profile should qualify as a primary source. akuyumeTC 08:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing unreferenced tag 

message: February 23, the producer of Deichkind died in his apartment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.140.167 (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer died 

message: The translation for "Bitte ziehen Sie durch" sounds like it was made by a bablefish. "ziehen" in this context doesn't mean "pull". It's more like "puff/toke" (a cigarette). So the two words "ziehen" and "durch" mean something like puff hard on a hashpipe. The title then becomes funny because "Sie" ist a polite form of address (like a waiter would address a guest in a restaurant)  - in contrast one would say "Du" when talking to a friend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.78.133.136 (talk) 14:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Kucch To Hai

message: I have noticed that this was previously on the article and had been put back. However, we are not interested in the list of dead characters as it is un-wiki --Maurice45 (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths & Survivors 
Talk:Richmond Flowers Sr.

message: How did Richmond Flowers have anything to do with 'Baker v. Carr'?   It was a Tennessee case, not an Alabama case, and was decided in March 1962, well before Flowers became Attorney General of Alabama.
75.204.213.127 (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Baker v. Carr'?
Talk:Kin-Buc Landfill

message: Not the most fascinating of articles, but just a random cleanup.. Not sure what else is needed for the article to feel a bit more complete.. Anyone? NathanLee 02:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burlington Bertie

message: The Analysis section smacks of original research. If it is, it should be removed. If it is a common analysis, references should be cited.Lilac Soul 10:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can probably get a reference. That Bow is not the most salubrious part of London, is well-known to UK residents, though maybe not to persons of other countries. It is for the benefit of the latter that I mention it. It would be the same thing as if some supposedly wealthy American gave his address as the Bronx or the Bowery. Geographic frames of reference are commonplace knowledge in one country but possibly enigmatic in another country. As Al Capone said: 'I don't even know what street Canada is on.' Colin4C 13:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed with the above - the analysis is a bit skewed. The character portrayed is not wealthy or aristocratic, but has delusions of grandeur. Probably a cockney.--Lil Miss Picky (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 

message: From the article:
:'The original song "Burlington Bertie" referred to Burlington Arcade, an area of London with many side arches: these arches led to the arcade's unintended notoriety as a popular refuge for homeless people -- at night, after the arcade's shops were closed -- where they could sleep with some degree of shelter and privacy. (In the song, Burlington Bertie is boasting of his address in the arcade: a posh enough address, indeed ... but only in the daytime.) Two popular music-hall songs of the 1930s, performed by Bud Flanagan and Chesney Allen -- "Underneath the Arches" and "Where the Arches Used to Be" -- are widely perceived to refer to Burlington Arcade, despite conflicting explanations by Flanagan and others. The song title "Burlington Bertie from Bow" makes little sense, because Burlington Arcade and Bow are in two completely different parts of London.
Somehow I don't think so...I have never heard of the Burlington Arcade being used as a shelter for the homeless. And, besides, Bertie is from Bow in the East-End of London. The song even tracks his progress from the East End to the West End...Colin4C 14:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this true? 

message: The song wasn't written in 1915: it was first recorded in 1915. It was first performed in Newcastle, UK, in 1914 - as per "Who's Who of British Music Hall" http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/THEATRE-UK/2001-08/0998118660  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.76.0.3 (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of song 

message: I think it's important to explain to people the "L.s.d." in the lyrics. I am pretty sure from the age and the context that it is supposed to mean £/s/d — Pounds, Shillings and Pence, the "old money". Without any explanation, people are going to think it's a reference to a drug (narcotic). Especially if they're not from the UK or born after decimalisation day.
AndyCivil (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "L.s.d." requires an explanation
Talk:Amy Ephron

message: This article seems to have been started by a relative, Maia Harari.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.161.178 (talk) 09:49, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative 
Talk:Kaiketsu Zubat

message: I'm unsure if the second trivia question about this Zubat and the Zubat should stay here. I'm sure it's true, but it doesn't sound like a meaningful trivia question.
Ultim87 02:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Thaumas

message: Obviously, they are two spellings of the same name.  They should be merged to whichever is the correct spelling. Aleta 02:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: Should we really be saying "Poseidon overthrew him and became the new sea god.".  That seems like bad genealogy to me...  If Thaumas is the son of Pontus & Gaia...  wouldn't that make him primordial?  Primordials give rise to the Titans , which in turn give rise to the Olympians... the monologous term "god(s)" is counter-intuitive, especially so in this case.  Thaumas isn't even in the wet domain...  Thaumas is a boundary...  the mirrors reflection, so to speak...  If anything, Poseidon would have overthrown Pontus, but that doesn't even make sense!  You don't overthrow your domain...  you  own it. Lostubes (talk) 18:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: overthrew?