Talk:Madeira Airport

message: Could someone please update the busiest routes section in the article for figures of 2013? Diogo sfreitas (talk) 00:00, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Madeira Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130822120839/http://www.ana.pt/ngt_server/attachfileu.jsp?look_parentBoui=112474551&att_display=y&att_download=y to http://www.ana.pt/ngt_server/attachfileu.jsp?look_parentBoui=112474551&att_display=y&att_download=y
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Madeira Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006065508/http://www.flygermania.de/download/file/Flugplaene/Flugplan.pdf to http://www.flygermania.de/download/file/Flugplaene/Flugplan.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Declined PROD.  I doubt more than a few paragraphs could be written about this statue.  Better to merge it with the airport. pbp 15:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also merge/delete Statue of Cristiano Ronaldo (probably into Cristiano Ronaldo). --SuperJew (talk) 16:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on that count with . All that is noted in that article is that it doesn't look like him. The notability of that statue is completely not on the scale to deserve an article. Harambe Walks (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cristiano Ronaldo International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20140528094156/http://www.iabse.org/IABSE/association/Organisation_files/Outstanding_Structure_Award/Funchal_Airport_Extension__Madeira_Island__Portugal_.aspx to http://www.iabse.org/IABSE/association/Organisation_files/Outstanding_Structure_Award/Funchal_Airport_Extension__Madeira_Island__Portugal_.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227113818/http://www.iabse.ethz.ch/association/awards/ostrac/index.php to http://www.iabse.ethz.ch/association/awards/ostrac/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: So, I resurrected Draft:Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo. The artist has created a second bust depicting Ronaldo, so I'd like to revisit whether or not this topic is notable. I'd like to be given time to make further improvements to the draft, and I expect there will be additional sourcing published about the second original work of art. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to be completely transparent about this, given how things went the first time around. Pinging you all here as editors who either contributed to the original article or participated in the above merge discussion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:56, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Also pinging all editors who participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not notable. Worthy of a mention in the airport article perhaps, but there's no way it should have a standalone article. Number 57 23:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you explain your reasoning, given the extensive secondary coverage? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Same as before, not notable. Kante4 (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  But why not? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Because nothing has changed, other than the presence of a second bust. I'd say it is worthy of mention on both the Ronaldo and the airport articles, but not an article on its own, whether one sculpture or two.Crowsus (talk) 10:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read the article that was given as a source and this article states that the second bust was commissioned by the website 'Bleacher Report' and the original bust is still outside the airport, so this source does not support the statement StringXV (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

text: The sculptor already has an article here, created at the same time as the first bust unveiling. His body of work only describes that piece, but I feel that's acceptable. However, since there is an article on the creator and sentences in the articles for the subject and the location, I don't really see why anything for the piece itself is really needed. Crowsus (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

text: Pinging you so you're aware of this discussion. Thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 06:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

text: "Another Believer - I'm genuinely puzzled, having read the objections from both outings. Your draft is high quality and as Notability is determined by coverage, it seems to me that it fully qualifies. I think there's an "I don't like it" element to the opposition. I feel the same about bitcoin articles, but I don't stand in their way when they are well sourced. If you'd like me to accept it, I'm happy to do so, although you can, of course, place it in mainspace yourself. Just drop a note on my Talkpage. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not quite sure where to weigh in about all this, so I'll start here.  It seems to me that both the airport and the bust deserve separate articles.  The airport article why is not under discussion, so, the bust.  The article Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo has some issues that need to be addressed but it seems clear to me that there needs to be an article about this work.  It seems to have garnered worldwide attention and as a piece of bronze statuary will be around for a long time. Keep. Carptrash (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Based on weight of RS, probably. It would look better with a picture of the bust.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. I've added the "image requested" tag to the talk page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo, part 2 

message: Just for the record, the history of Draft:Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo was merged into the history of Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo. I'll take the blame for there being discussions at multiple locations (I was trying to get folks to contribute to the above discussion), but for those who may be following,  acted on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Public_Art#Bust_of_Cristiano_Ronaldo and User_talk:KJP1#Bust. While I'm against this article being redirected, I'm glad to have the histories merged. Editors can view the updated draft here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 06:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging you so you're aware of this discussion. Thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 06:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

text: "Another Believer - I'm genuinely puzzled, having read the objections from both outings. Your draft is high quality and as Notability is determined by coverage, it seems to me that it fully qualifies. I think there's an "I don't like it" element to the opposition. I feel the same about bitcoin articles, but I don't stand in their way when they are well sourced. If you'd like me to accept it, I'm happy to do so, although you can, of course, place it in mainspace yourself. Just drop a note on my Talkpage. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not quite sure where to weigh in about all this, so I'll start here.  It seems to me that both the airport and the bust deserve separate articles.  The airport article why is not under discussion, so, the bust.  The article Bust of Cristiano Ronaldo has some issues that need to be addressed but it seems clear to me that there needs to be an article about this work.  It seems to have garnered worldwide attention and as a piece of bronze statuary will be around for a long time. Keep. Carptrash (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Based on weight of RS, probably. It would look better with a picture of the bust.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. I've added the "image requested" tag to the talk page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: No. Just No. Look at the pictures. Probably more likely 70 ft. --BjKa (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "180 columns, each about 70 m (230 ft) tall." 

message: In 2017 there was a ceremony held by the Government of Madeira in which the airport was supposed to be rebranded as "Cristiano Ronaldo International Airport". News reports said something about the name change being contingent on the government transportation authorities approving it. I couldn't find sources discussing the details of the name change further after that.
Now in 2022, the official website of the airport and that of the Portuguese airport authority don't include a user-facing mention of this supposed name. There are no mentions in corporate annual reports, and no announcements from the ceremony. There is only a single instance of this name on their site, appearing under the non-official looking "Corporate" > "Environment & Sustainability" .
Portuguese newspapers still occasionally mention this name as if it were the actual name.
But does anyone know: Did this name change not go through?
157.157.113.120 (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 13:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cristiano Ronaldo International Airport →  – This undiscussed move from 2020  was twice contested before (in 2018 and 2016). As mentioned when this was last contested, "Madeira Airport" is the clear common name, with there being no mentions of this alleged official name on the airport's website. 157.157.113.120 (talk) 13:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

text: * Support – Cristiano Ronaldo is still alive and not retired yet. -St3095 (?) 15:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

text: * Support per nom --Eldomtom2 (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

text: *Support - Cristiano Ronaldo still being alive doesn't matter in the slightest, but WP:common name does and the airport is overwhelmingly known as Madeira Airport. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 May 2022