Talk:Better Business Bureau

message: 20/20 exposé of BBB is not mentioned on this page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo8kfV9kONw  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.87.178 (talk) 18:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been added.--Elvey (talk) 23:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

text: That's not how speedy deletion works; please see WP:SPEEDY.  You're welcome to edit this article yourself. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 13:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to include 20/20 television show

message: http://www.bbb.org/business-reviews/ratings/
and
http://www.bbb.org/business-reviews/ratings/overview.html
are quite detailed... but also very far from clear or precise.
As I read it, there's a maximum raw score of (8+20+20+10+15+8+5=) 86 and a minimum of (-41-10-41+2-21+1-12-5-5-30-41-5-41-10=) -259.  It's unclear how this a particular score is scaled to the 0-100 range, but after that, it's converted to a letter grade using a typical scale.--Elvey (talk) 23:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Lack of) ratings system transparency 

message: Is the BBB a non-profit corporation? 
Tashiro (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is mentioned in the lede. VQuakr (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the BBB A non-profit corporation? 

message: Be careful what/how you cite the CBBB website.  The CBBB somehow blocks normal archival tools from its website, e.g. see http://www.webcitation.org/6CXy4xQCK and http://www.webcitation.org/6CXyFoAeO but see also http://archive.is/CaUi.--Elvey (talk) 22:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning to Editors 

message: I propose that National Advertising Division be merged into this article. It does not need its own article and it likely does not meet notability requirements. Moonboy54 (talk) 02:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not a clean merge after looking at the National Advertising Division article.Mrm7171 (talk) 08:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly a one sentence merge? I can see the logic for this proposal though.Mrm7171 (talk) 08:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I just figured NAD doesn't deserve its own article and it could fit into BBB. It seemed like a merge would be easier than deletion followed by incorporation into the BBB article.Moonboy54 (talk) 06:44, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Advertising Division merger proposal 

message: UGG. This is bald face advertising. The Alexis claims are wrong. Almost all of it is from those who would financially benefit by it. It would take me all day to fix all this propaganda. I'm going to close my eyes and leave this mess to the innocent eyes that will be misled by it. 73.36.206.197 (talk) 23:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article is out of date. It is also the only available free source of information on the topic. If anything better that was free existed anywhere then that source could be copied here. I also wish somehow this could be improved. Think of this Wikipedia article as the first ever published record that a problem exists for lack of information on this topic.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article out of date 2015 

message: Council of Better Business Bureau has restructured into three organizations. The information on this page would need to be updated. You can find more details here: https://bbbprograms.org/media/cbbb-restructures/
Thank you!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.205.108.2 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit 

message: * It is not known what changes are requested to be made. Please state your desired changes in the form of "Change x to y using z". 
 
	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
	A reference which verifies the requested change
Please change:
*The Sun's diameter is 25 miles.
to read as:
*The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles.
using as a reference:
* 
Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed. 
Regards,  Spintendo  19:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 28-AUG-2019

message: * What I think should be changed: The redirect for National Advertising Division currently pointing to this page.
* Why it should be changed: The National Advertising Divison, as of June 2019, is no longer affiliated with the Better Business Bureau. It is a division of BBB National programs, an independent non-profit organization.
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): 
I hope I have done this right and I do apologize if I haven't. (redacted) Thank you!
CreativeEditoratLarge (talk) 21:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  Please follow the WP:RFD process for requests regarding redirects. Melmann 23:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect for NAD Redirected (Conflict of Interest Edit Request)