lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sapieha Palace, Vilnius

message: :I suppose, Giovanni Pietro Perti/Peretti (b. Muggio, 1648 - d. 1714, Vilnius) deserves  his own article. Iulius 08:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pietro Perti/Peretti 

message: I do not have any better picture of Sapieha palace. The front view was obstructed by the trees and from either side it looks very ruined (from front as well). --Lysytalk 11:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So what should be done then? I don't have it either ;) Iulius 11:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some historical drawing or old photo ? --Lysytalk 12:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is one somewhere. and quite a nice one, but not necessary true to original. need to scan... will take some time.Iulius 12:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I have a couple of reproductions of old photos by Jan Bułhak but they have copyright problems as the author died 56 years ago and his photos are still sold by ZPAF. --Lysytalk 13:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I've put one - now it's your turn Iulius 13:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done. For the photos I will have to wait 14 years until 2020, when the copyright expires. --Lysytalk 13:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the palace 

message: Should we have the ".. in Vilnius" title in the beginning of the text - its clear anyway that it's Vilnius' palace? Iulius 17:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it made the sentence sound awkward. --Lysytalk 17:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: thumb|200px|A 19th century copy of Pietro Rossi drawing. Presumably Sapieha palace, although it is similar to Slushko Palace as well
Arcades - were they in the first floor only as seen in the picture? Iulius 18:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they were multiple floors, but I don't know how many. --Lysytalk 19:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However, it is not apparent from all images. Is that a true fact or an unassessed speculation by Klos? Iulius 05:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Does not seem like a speculation, he seems quite firm abut this, but in fact they were not in the front but on the sides. I will add a reference for this in the article. --Lysytalk 17:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arcades
Talk:Graphical timeline of the Stelliferous Era

message: The page has [had] inconsistant usage of milliard/billion. In the interests of consistancy, I'm changeing them all to short scale, since this is what is generally used in scientific circles anyway. --Brainwad 07:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

message: This article shows the reionization phase starting at 100 million years after the Big Bang and completing before the formation of the first galaxies at 600 million years after the Big Bang. But the reionization article says: reionization is the process that reionized the matter in the universe after the epoch of galaxy formation. Which is correct ? Gandalf61 16:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind - found answer at  and Timeline of the Big Bang. Gandalf61 16:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reionization and galaxy formation 

message: Then all references to Heat Death could be removed from this article. Najro (talk) 16:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stelliferous Era independent of Heat Death?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-25/Interwiki report

message: Could we write the name of the user? I guess it's Haabet, but I'm not sure?? Snailwalker | talk 21:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? Sugarpinet/c 23:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He is talking about the well-known user we recently banned in danish Wikipedia. I don't see why we we couldn't mentione him by name, if we want to? --Christian 01:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Go ahead an add it. Streamwater 01:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text: why was this person banned? Dev920 10:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Poor Mountain

message: Both GNIS and NGS (in external links) show a much lower elevation and different coordinates than those in the infobox. NGS is generally considered authoritative and GNIS is generally considered authoritative for coordinates but not elevation. In this case there is a higher point on the mountain which is identifed by both Peakbagger.com and Peaklist.org both of which are considered reliable sources. Because it seems to be the general practice on Wikipedia to use the coordinates of the highest point to identify the location of a mountain I used the latter sources as did a former editor (in part). If you intend to change these values please discuss it with me first. --DRoll (talk) 23:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates and elevation 

message: I recently edited out the majority the last paragraph for this entry. Personally, I think most of the information in this section is extraneous at best. While the information may be useful to, as you put it, "[answer] the question of whether viewers can point their antennas in one direction to get good reception," I hardly think it pertains to this particular article; especially since there is an antenna farm article already. 
However, I see no need to get into an edit war over this. I simply thought you might like to respond to the above. --Blackened (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Last paragraph
Talk:African ribbontail catshark

message: I think a picture would be nice, I found one here. Noone really heard of it, that's why I suggested this, but I'm not sure if it will cause copyright issues? If so, maybe I can get permission from them? What do you think?Crud3w4re 08:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 01:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Picton, New South Wales

message: Part of the Wolverine (film) was filmed here, portraying a Yukon village. - 2001:388:608C:4C58:78DF:92BF:3235:72C1 (talk) 03:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: IMHO this gentleman deserves his own article. Most of the details have already been paraphrased from the ADB in Jarvisfield, Picton. Any volunteers to run with it? Downsize43 (talk) 23:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Biography/By_profession#Adventurers%2C_explorers_and_pioneers Downsize43 (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlink for [[Henry Colden Antill]]
Talk:VL Tuisku

message: JAWA 1938 is a sound source for the specs, both landplane and seaplane, but has nothing to say on the difference between Tuisku I and II.  Instead, it talks about Tuisku/T (military) and Tuisku/O (school).  It mentions the possible fitting of a Lycoming R-680 without saying if this happened. Could do with help from Finnish speakers with their sources.  The numbers don't quite add up, the serials suggesting 31 FAF machines rather than 30.  Would the FAF serials have included (as some suggest) 2 prototypes as well as 13 Mk Is and 16 Mk IIs?  Is there a ref for these numbers?  Were any Tuisku/Os built?TSRL (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and issues
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-25/Clerk resigns

message: Isn't Kelly male?  Or am I confusing them with someone else? -- Beland 03:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kelly is transgendered, and prefers to be referred to as female.  Most users, and the Signpost, refer to Kelly using female pronouns per her preference.  Ral315 (talk) 03:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender
Talk:Tamsui District

message: I moved this page from Tamsui because "Danshui" is now the most common name (used, for example, on MRT maps and highway signs). --Jiang 3 July 2005 10:38 (UTC)
I don't think so.You can search by google.Tamsui:324000,Danshui:147000,Danshuei:69500."Tamsui" is more than others.
And the Tamsui goverment use the name "Tamsui".You can see here.--Alicekey 08:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think both ways would be fine, but a move should be carried out as a move; it shouldn't be carried out as a cut-and-paste, because that ruins the edit history of the page, which is necessary to comply with GFDL.  --Nlu (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: Well, just check the website... Hanyu Pinyin is official now... Gumuhua (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y I moved to Danshui: 

message: Althougt here's name is Danshui, but it's address is actually "Tamsui, Taipei, Taiwan" http://www.tshs.tpc.gov.tw/fore/taindex_en.asp Alicekey (talk) 07:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's still Tamsui 

message: The referenced article, "Chico gets a Southern Sister" makes no reference to Danshui, Taiwan or Taipei.  It's talking about Mississippi, US.  Ok if I delete this reference?  The article referenced is here:
http://www.newsreview.com/chico/content?oid=43367
Supertomcom (talk) 18:28, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister City? 

message: According to the executive council of Tamsui District, every government organization and school use the translation "Tamsui" for the signs.  
New Taipei City Government notified Taiwan Ministry of Education and Ministry of the Interior of the historic and traditional name "Tamsui" as the only English translation name on May 24, 2011. 
I suggest our moving everything Danshui to Tamsui.
Necbest (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The common name is not always the government's name. See WP:COMMONNAME. —HXL's Roundtable and Record 21:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamsui, new local government sets up the only name for translation

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Can someone look at the inbound links since I'm not familiar with the topic and some could be for the city. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support since it's the official romanization now. -Multivariable (talk) 19:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
And another request for Talk:Danshui River. 219.84.209.163 (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: — Assignment last updated by PunxsutawneyPhilPennsylvania (talk) 23:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Middle East through Many Lenses
Talk:List of Soviet Air Force bases

message: It's unclear for me - how the regional divison was selected. Why, say, Baku occured in "West Central"? It should be "Caucasian", I think. --jno 08:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional division 

message: There seem to be two entries for the airbase at Gudauta, sometimes referred to as 'Bombora'. Could someone (sufficiently knowledgeable) merge them, please? And BTW isn't this airbase worth of its own article? Jan olieslagers (talk) 18:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bombora / Gudauta
Talk:Hikawa Shrine (Saitama)

message: Wiki says to not copy text from websites, yet the entire text in this article is copied from , violation? Crud3w4re 08:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the article at Answers.com is this Wikipedia article. Answers.com is not a research source, it simply links to articles - particularly Wikipedia articles. You could say that it is they who have copied us. Accordingly, Answers.com should never be given as a reference in Wikipedia. Pinkville 14:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation? 
Talk:Relativistic wave equations

message: I'm not entirely happy that the first sentence talks about relativistic replacements for the Schrodinger equation. The given wave equations are usually the equations of motion for the underlying classical field, are they not? --Masud 08:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are they really quantum? 

message: I think they are found here: --Maschen (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been notified here at the wikiproject talk page. There should be an article on this, but I don't understand these equations yet - else of course I would write about them...--Maschen (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan to cobble together a few papers and start the article:  (this last one is not very helpful, but at least something...) Maschen (talk) 09:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bargmann-Wigner equations for any-spin particles?
Talk:Web Services Distributed Management

message: I am creating this stub in the hope that someone can fill it in an explain what its for and what it means. I have read the spec and don't understand it! 
I have seen this in Oracle BPEL documentation (evidently Oracle BPEL can work in association with WSDM web service management systems, but I can't even get a rough idea of what these are! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chris Q (talk • contribs) .
:I've expanded it and added some more details about my understanding of it.  -- Bovineone 03:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What it is
Talk:Lekvár

message: See Powidl. Both articles should be integrated.
Xx236 08:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Also merge Apple butter, and perhaps use the title Fruit butter. --Una Smith (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:In the Groove 2

message: Like the In The Groove article, this needs a POV overhaul and simplification. Drano 09:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvements

message: The maximum BPM is listed as 1300 in the article. Isn't it supposed to be 1337?
:Yes, Robotix's max BPM is 1337  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.236.93.210 (talk) 19:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Robotix BPM

message: I feel like there is some clarification / elaboration needed in this regard - even if it means going into some of the system specs [like the fact that ITG2 runs on a Linux O/S] - since the listed "cons" seem to be very vague at best.Travelsonic (talk) 12:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elaboration regarding pros/cons of hacking ITG2 machines
Talk:Revised Common Lectionary

message: The fact that different sides of the argument are provided does not make this a balanced article. The argument that a Sunday lectionary with 156 Sundays and three readings cannot present the whole bible is a matter of common sense. It would be more useful for any critique to point out the serious omissions or the positive developments. It is not encyclopaedic to reproduce extreme views, even if these are balanced by others. Serious liturgical scholarship alone qualifies for inclusion. I am proposing to rewrite the whole section but would prefer to seek consensus first. Roger Arguile 09:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I've reverted the recent changes for a variety of reasons.  Much of the History section was already included in the lead, and discussion of the wider history of lectionaries in general doesn't really belong in this article.
The section entitled "Lectionary Controversy" was problematic on several levels, it was cealry copied from elsewhere, albeit it with the asertion that the author of the text had given permission.  However, it is far from clear exactly what level of permission had been granted, and whether this was sufficient to cover the requirements of the GFDL under which Wikipedia operates.  The issues of trying to cover the entirety of scripture during Sunday services are already alluded to, and I don't think there's any need to go into the full detail in this article.  I will re-insert a link to the website so it is avialble to those that are interested.  David Underdown 10:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes to the article 

message: I refered to this item to see if the Common Lectionary includes references to verses in the Apocryphal or RC Deuterocanonical books.  But it does not say.  Can someone find out and add it in?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.44.139 (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include Apocrypha? 

message: I wonder $subject. -- ke4roh (talk) 12:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What fraction of the Bible is covered by the RCL?
Talk:Boot (torture)

message: Anyone have any? In particular, the 'Spanish boot' isn't mentioned anywhere in our fairly thoroguh article on Inquisition, which makes me suspect it's, in whole or part, anti-Catholic propaganda... The Land 09:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore me - found one. The Land 19:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: In one now-removed section, references was made to The Big Book of Pain, by Donnelly and Diehl. This is not, as far as I am concerned, a reliable source for an encyclopedia. I don't really believe that The History Press is such a great publishing company (I have seen no evidence to suggest it is), and the authors are known for writing TV shows of the highly popular kind--you know, cannibalism, ghosts, etc. Moreover, I can find no reviews of the book or citations, so I have no choice but to conclude that it is not a reliable source per WP:RS. Besides, the language used was not very encyclopedic. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More boots 

message: I believe a foot screw was used in the most recent episode of the Game of Thrones season 3.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.197.137.25 (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game of Thrones 

message: I've removed unsourced or undersourced material from an editor who seems to have a history of hopping from IP address to IP address to evade blocks, while depositing speculative material that's unsourced, badly sourced, unverifiably sourced, or misleadingly sourced. 
Porcsten (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing unsourced or vastly undersourced material
Talk:Under the Volcano

message: User:Drmies removed "semi-autobiographical" from the lead, with the edit summary "i disagree. 'semi-autobiographical' is too easy to thrown around".
That may be a valid opinion, but critics and reviewers seem to use "semi-autobiographical" as the primary adjective to describe the book.  At Wikipedia, aren't we supposed to rely on third-party sources, and not our own opinions? CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 06:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Semi-autobiographical"

message: is a chapter by chapter summery of the book appropriate for Wikipedia?  should Wikipedia act as a kind of Spark Notes for people too lazy to read the book?  Spark Notes is online, after all, and an encyclopaedia serves a different purpose.
76.19.63.222 (talk) 03:50, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree entirely. Spark Notes have their own function. A wikipedia plot summary should be exactly that  -  without spoilers too, as with detective thrillers. Valetude (talk) 15:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot summery a little long? 

message: In the summary it says the Consul is killed and his killers "throw his body into a ditch." This isn't quite right as it is noted a few times that the Farolito cantina is perched on the edge of a deep precipice, viz:
"he approached the open window on his right. It was almost a sheer drop to the bottom of the ravine. [...] the sheer height was terrifying" p339
So, at the end as he dies, I think the implication is that he is thrown off the edge of the cliff, into the "abyss" (which is also a recurring image.) In fact, great heights in general are a theme of the final chapter. 
Also, when the dead dog follows him in his descent, in the very last line, the word "ravine" is used. 
So, it's pretty unambiguous that this plunge takes place into something more profound and dramatic than just a "ditch."
Z0s (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wholly agree. Thanks for spotting that. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder and Body 
Talk:Chiapa de Corzo (Mesoamerican site)

message: See Talk:Chiapa de Corzo, Chiapas#Dab needs work. Ideally this stub should just be remerged back in as the history section of the other page. Even if it is split off, these are lousy dabs. Both are sites in Mesoamerica. It's trying to say archaeological site but doing it too poorly. — LlywelynII 13:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Remerge
Talk:Sheree Winton

message: The Times says that she had "a Bond film on her CV". The IMDB does not list this; mistake, tiny bit part, did she use a different name, or something else? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bond 

message: MY LATE SISTERS REAL NAME WAS SHIRLEY JUNE PATRICK NOT SHEREE AS STATED
                        YOURS SINCERELY 
                             JOSEPH PATRICK(HER YOUNGER BROTHER)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.56.70.124 (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Portal talk:New Zealand/Selected article/Week 41, 2006

message: The image :Image:Mmp-poster.jpg is fair use, so can't really be displayed on a portal. --Midnighttonight remind to go do uni work! 09:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't use fair-use images as the selected picture, but to illustrate an article or news story I think is okay. I realise some people have a harder interpretation of the rules than this.-gadfium 19:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: fair use
Talk:Montagu Bertie, 2nd Earl of Lindsey

message: I think someone has confused Lindsey with Lindsay. (RJP 09:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peerage of Scotland 
Talk:Carol Truax

message: These suggest she's dead:
* she was an American music administrator ... 
* She was noted both for her time as Executive Director ...
But these suggest she's alive:
* She is the sister of author ....
* Carol Truax has written or edited over 20 cookbooks.
Since we show no date of birth, it's hard to even hazard a guess as to her age, assuming she's still alive, which is a moot point.  JackofOz 10:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you JackofOz for this point. Yes, I am fully aware that there are no birth and death dates in this article. I just can't find them anywhere! Not for lack of research I can assure you! One thing I do know is this: Carol Truax's sister Rhoda Truax was born 1901 and died 2000. Also, Carol's publicity photo in her 1968 book "The Art of Salad Making" looks to be of a woman in her 60's. This is also confirmed from the photos contained in the book Liberace Cooks, published in 1970. Hopefully, some other Wiki contributers can solve the dates issue. I will of course keep trying as well. Musicmaker 13:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fixed now.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 14:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead or Alive