Talk:National Security Council (Turkey)

message: Ryulong has just vandalized legitimate metatagging and additions put in the main article today 10/7/06. He also blocks his user page against any discussion or talk to find out why he vandalizes.
Bertilvidet and Khoikhoi: your vandalism on MGK – National Security Council page and some other Turkey or Turkish related subjects have nothing to do with the educational informative spirit of any encyclopedia. This is not a media of propaganda or personal blog or commentary forum. I encourage you to post and support factual information, not self-serving self-satisfaction material.
This page is not objective it has an athmosphere against the military. In fact military isn't the only power they claim here even military is vulnerable to some state based organisations which all countries have and different than the armies of West, Turkish army supported democracy in Turkey also the coups was against  undemocratic goverments (1961 Democrat Party , hidden cencorship, agression against minorities),in 1980 low level civil war between leftists and nationalists (also a president couldn't be elected),in 1996 the constitution was under danger from governing parties also islamic terror was rising (Prime minister Erbakan said "Sheriat will come somehow but will it be sweet or will it be bloody") also it has been prooved that Erbakan and his companions have stolen money from Parties reserves and the aid they collected to help bosnian muslims who were being genocided by christians.So is there anyone to tell that in these situations someone in your country would do nothing if so your country is already dead...
:Dear anonymous user. Thank you so much for aknowledging our contributions to Wikipedia. If you have any concerns about inaccuracies in this article, please adress them specifically here on the talk page. I believe the article both presents the way the military regards its own role in the Turkish society, and its criticism. Please refrain from deleting well sources text, but again raise possible concerns here on the talk page. Every single coup has its own article, that all deserve further expansions. We should not discuss in detail the coups here. Bertilvidet 17:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ryulong is a Vandal

message: I wonder why wikipedia pages related with Turks and Turkey are tried to be disputed.  Just try to be objective!
Reverting legitimate edits arbitrarily and obsessively with disrespectful disregard and without intellectual commenting on the changes that are attempted by us is vandalism that certain administratiors seem to conciously support. They dont even let these commenta show in their user and talk pages so the others be informed and be the judge. Otherwise patronizing comments on others like "trolling" only indicate they are corrupt. Restored a third-party supportive reference link to Turkey page that was vandalized by Khoikhoi, an anti-turkish propagandist, who deleted the link under the false pretense of removing spam while knowing that it was not. Usually, his disruptive actions are backed by some other "contibutors" of smilar behaviour and mentality, such as BertilVidet who does not allow anyone to improve his screwy opiniation expressed in the National Security Council article  (he can't even spell right)  and Aldux, and sporadically another odd Greek, Kurd or Armenian anti-turk, who remove corrective edits that were done in good faith to restore objectivity and knowledge content, to gain stronger standing in their minds, only to wipe each other's butt. I encourage you to consider why on earth there are such so many edits in all Turkey and Turkish wikipedia articles again and again by such people when there is none in their nationality & ethnicity related articles entered by any Turk, ever.
:Disregarding the personal attacks, I kindly, once again, urge to raise on the talk page if there is substantial criticism to the article. As you can see from the article's history page, this article has been subject to quite a lot of vandalism recently. Bertilvidet 18:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are copying directly from the Turkish government website—that is unacceptable. Why do Wikipedia articles have to reflect only the view of the government? —Khoikhoi 19:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Also, please do not delete sourced information. See WP:V. —Khoikhoi 19:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I have no objections. —Khoikhoi 05:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Objectiveness Required

message: I just had to revert an anon editor that inserted loads of tags in the article (including a rather funny one suggesting that the article is a user page). It is not clear to me if it is vandalism, or if there are serious concerns behind the tagging. If the latter is the case, please go step by step and adress the concerns here on the talk page. For instance, I am not aware of disputes over the factual accuracy - but if there are, please raise them, so we can improve the article. Bertilvidet 07:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All kinds of possible tags have been inserted into the text again. If someone has serious concerns about the content (not about co-editors), please adress them one by one here, and let's see if we can reach a consensus. Bertilvidet 07:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mega-tagging 

message: The author and third party readers are referred to the page history, article history and user history pages regarding why this article is more of a user page, reflecting the views of one single individual who prevents others from legitimate edits and good-faith entries. In respect to his protest, one meta-tag accusing him of misuse of the article as a user page is temporarily removed. The author is encouraged to address in a responsible way in the talk pages to each of the meta tags and mend the deficiencies for consideration of removal of metatag, rather than exhibiting further oppositional defience.
:All kinds of possible tags have been inserted into the text again. If someone has serious concerns about the content (not about co-editors), please adress them one by one here, and let's see if we can reach a consensus. Bertilvidet 07:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up tagging 

message: On the second paragraph past the intro, a Metin Heper is now cited in-text (as opposed to footnotes, if I'm getting this right). However, I'm still not sure if it's properly paraphrased after the end of the first Heper quote. It strikes me as a little confusing in any case. Does anyone know the magazine he's citing? Kennard2 00:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation problem 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on National Security Council (Turkey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110928214949/http://www.aksiyon.com.tr/detay.php?id=25030&yorum_id=12136 to http://www.aksiyon.com.tr/detay.php?id=25030&yorum_id=12136
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Security Council (Turkey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106040555/http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060101faessay85108/ersel-aydinli-nihat-ali-ozcan-dogan-akyaz/the-turkish-military-s-march-toward-europe.html to http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060101faessay85108/ersel-aydinli-nihat-ali-ozcan-dogan-akyaz/the-turkish-military-s-march-toward-europe.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Security Council (Turkey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080908061209/http://www.mgk.gov.tr/Turkce/sss.html to http://www.mgk.gov.tr/Turkce/sss.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: National Security Council has another logo. Please upload it. 78.177.162.79 (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPLOAD PHOTO