lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Laser Mission

message: (moved from article)
That is not the correct cover for this movie.  It is from another Brandon Lee movie called Rapid Fire.  Someone just added 'Laser Mission' over the title 'Rapid Fire'.
-Solanthel
Comment: Verified, source is falsified as well.  Removed and deletion of image requested. SkierRMH 03:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Until a source can be cited indicating this movie's release into public domain, I have removed the link to view the movie online.  Feel free to restore the link when the information can be verified. SlimXero (talk) 04:11, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain 

message: Laser Mission is registered as copyright to Turner Home Entertainment in the United States Copyright Office database. Search on "Laser Mission" in the United States Copyright Office database. Last accessed December 29, 2011. This notice is required as previous editors mistakenly wrote the film is in the Public Domain, which is not borne out by US Government records. Green Cardamom (talk) 03:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film is copyright 
Talk:Mr Bones

message: yesh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! da bones!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 420!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.7.115 (talk) 03:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Essay 105.0.4.104 (talk) 18:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English essay mr bones movie
Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates

message: The nominator wishes to close the nomination. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore this. It looks like they  their mind. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please archive [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of general elections in Botswana/archive1]] 

message: Do we have any lists of lists at FL. Are they eligible for FL? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  15:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think we have any; closest is Outline of lichens. There's nothing against it in the rules, though it's likely to be difficult to have one that's not just an index of wikipedia articles but actually a subject that itself passes NLIST. --PresN 17:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lists of lists]] 

message: I have two lists at WP:FLC that have substantial support for promotion: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Green Bay Packers draft picks (1936–1969)/archive1 with 4 supports including a source review and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Green Bay Packers draft picks (1970–present)/archive1 with 3 supports including a source review and one other comment addressed. Any issue with me putting up a third nom? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  15:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we want to keep it capped at 2 per nom for now, though I'd expect your oldest nom to be promoted in a few days anyway. --PresN 15:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, thanks! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  15:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , any chance you could take a look at them again? Both have substantial support and no recent activity. I would appreciate it! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  17:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Promoted them both, actually! --PresN 18:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Nom 

message: It's been nominated, but it seems to not be listed on the FLC page. The Kip (contribs) 00:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @The Kip: You need to manually transclude the nomination page you created to WP:FLC. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of Boston Bruins seasons]] not appearing?
Talk:Charles Ginner

message: Some of his stuff may still be under copyright in the US but the following should be pretty safe:
*https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/leeds-canal-37467
*https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/the-stonemans-yard-41766
*https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/la-vieille-balayeuse-dieppe-198929
*https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/clarendon-dock-belfast-122048
*https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/plymouth-pier-from-the-hoe-147688
©Geni (talk) 15:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff hitting the public domain 1st jan 2023
Talk:Simonetti family

message: I guess that the person that tagged this article does not have any knowledge of the importance of the family to Tuscan history. Look into the Divine Comedy and books such as the historian Gammurrini. More information will be added in the future. Thank you.
:Perhaps you could provide the references and cites that show the importance of the family.  The article does not make it clear, and the purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information, not to assign homework or place the burden of research onto the user.Magichands 23:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Magichands is correct. It needs to be clear from the article why the subject is notable, and the burden to do so lies upon the author/creator, not upon the reader. Aecis No running, shouting or piddling in the shallow end 02:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 04:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Simonetti family →  – No need for disambiguation, there is only a redirect. Gryffindor (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 January 2021
Talk:T4 (Channel 4)

message: Nowhere in the article does it state what T4 is, or, now it has been axed, was.  An explanatory sentence "T4 was a..." would help. 
ixo (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What is T4?

message: Was it named after this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_T4  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.155.152.9 (talk) 11:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of T4 name?

message: Maybe a list of past and current presenters would be woth a look. After all, a lot of big presenting names started out on T4, ie Vernon Kay, Dermot O' Leary etc. Also the fact that it involved presenter interaction between shows and games etc should be noted. It clearly isnt just another time slot of Channel 4s, like their breakfast segment on weekdays. 80.192.40.63 (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, and the style of the segment and interaction between the presenters is also noteworthy. 79.78.79.225 (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Presenters on T4

message: The opening paragraph states "The logo of T4 is noticeably the top right segment of the standard Channel 4 logo."  Could somebody clarify this, as I'm struggling to understand it completely.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor67 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification on the logo

message: I notice a lot of programmes seem out of place. Has somebody just added programmes out of the top of their head. I have removed The Sopranos as, I'm sure that it wasn't broadcast during the T4 slot. This article says that The Sopranos had been broadcast after 11pm two years consecutively . Can someone else please look at the list? EhsanQ (talk) 01:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming
Talk:Self-verification theory

message: There are a mass of references but can we see some links to show that this theory has rceived any sort of peer review beyond the classrooms of William Swann. Good self-esteem is one thing, vanity is another. -- RHaworth 18:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The criticism section is not given an objective enough treatment; all criticism seems to be simply brushed off as baseless. I don't think this is what a criticism section is intended to be - it should contain different viewpoints, if they exist, and they should be defended as well as possible. Then a counter-criticism may be added, but I think even this should be reserved for the main article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szkott (talk • contribs) 07:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: All the sources stem from the creator of this theory. There are no sources that he is not at least an editor on (if not the main author). There needs to be better research from other parties to prove this theory or further explain what this theory means in more recent years. Helenamcharles (talk) 02:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of unbiased research
Talk:Menthol cigarette

message: this page is pretty damn racist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.158.107 (talk) 08:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I heard that when smokers smoke mentholated cigarettes, their lungs bleed for seven seconds, and I wanted to know if that were true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.169.83.171 (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old conversation

message: Hello editors, 
I've some suggested edits for this page, but I thought I would see if anybody else wanted to weigh in or offer advice before I change the page. 
First, I think the "Economics and Regulation in the US" section heading is clunky. The first two paragraphs seem to be about menthol cigarettes' use and popularity, so why not give that its own section (titled "Use and Popularity?"). "Regulation" should be its own section.
Also, there has been a lot of news in the last couple of years about the FDA proposed ban on menthol, as well the racial implications of such a proposed ban. I'm not sure if that's fitting for wikipedia or not, but perhaps "proposed ban" should be a subsection under "regulation."
Please let me know what you think either here or on my talk page. Thanks! Balloccoli (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edits to Regulation section, inclusion of the proposed ban. 
Talk:Wallace Civic Center

message: Did you know about the controversy which has been behind some of the previous musical acts held at the Civic center such as Marilyn Manson, or the WAAF beach party concert (I think it's called).  Also it's notable that at one time the musical group Nirvana played at the Wallace Civic Center, in 11/12/93. Link (http://www.ludd.luth.se/misc/nirvana/faq/ConcertChronology.html)Jcook5 18:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Association of Autonomous Astronauts

message: The AAA has been started back up!(?) Andrew Marsden 17:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Three references have dead links. The section Influences on other subcultures is in breach of WP:LINKFARM and the section AAA groups and links is heading that way.Autarch (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some issues 
Talk:Survivor Series (1997)

message: Added context about significance of PPV in WWF Attitude Era timeline, along with citation from WWE. This was instantly removed and reverted without explanation. This additional context is a worthwhile inclusion. If you have issue with the placement, sourcing, or wording of the edit, then please make an improvement while retaining the added information. Otherwise, don't just instantly revert the edit.
172.58.43.96 (talk) 03:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attitude Era mention. 

message: Created reception section, with review summary, rating, and citation.
172.58.45.53 (talk) 13:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception. 

message: Added tag to request event section.
65.102.187.215 (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event.
Talk:Survivor Series (2000)

message: The description of the finish is a little inaccurate. Undertaker didn't stop pinning him. Earl Hebner stopped counting first, and then 'Taker (with the announcers also "ignorant" of it not being Kurt) stalked Hebner. This was the reason Angle could sneak into the ring and roll up Undertaker. If Undertaker (in kayfabe) had realised first that it was Eric Angle, he would have been looking for Kurt and not been as susceptible to the sneaky pin. I feel this should be altered to reflect the true finish. HDC7777 14:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After checking, I confirmed this and have made the change. TJ Spyke 00:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undertaker v Kurt Angle 

message: Maybe this site will be enough proof... it's pretty detailed and seems reliable:
 --Andresg770 00:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What the hell? That site caused my popup blocker to go crazy (which only happens with bad sites), i've also never heard of it. Obsessed with Wrestling, WWE.com, Slam], Pro Wrestling History all have no HEAT match listed. TJ Spyke 00:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate to bring old things back, but since I know of the existence of this match (it is on the DVD), I really think it should be added to the article.  With that said and done, does 411mania.com (formerly 411wrestling.com) count as a reliable source? Because if it does, then this link might be proof that Jeff Hardy vs. Val Venis did indeed take place:   --Andresg770 15:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunday Night Heat Match 

message: Why is this article missing the aftermath section that other WWE PPV articles have? TicklesYourTaint (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath
Talk:Ad Astra (convention)

message: Someone has put link brackets around every name on the guest list. Some of the guests are not notable by Wikipedia standards. In particular, some names listed are linked to pages about unrelated people who happen to have the same name. Editors should do proper research. Avt tor (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The rule isn't to not put in any redlinks, but if someone isn't likely to be notable, then it is best to leave a redlink off. But if they are fairly likely to pass the notability test if an article were created, redlink away. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't create links to non-pages

message: A few months ago (in June) Avt tor removed 2 references from the article. Not sure what others think of the removal. --EarthFurst (talk) 23:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh. I build the historical convention table pretty mechanically, which is why there were so many redlinks. Avt was right to remove them; I probably should have when I previewed the copy/paste into the page. I simply didn't bother. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 05:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 references removed 

message: I have just removed the  template as the article doesn't actually seem slanted towards recent events anymore - the template includes mention of all the years of the event since it started. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recentism 
Talk:Con-Version

message: I cant get past the flash on its website.
:Looks like they updated the website for the new event this year. The flash works fine, but they have yet to release the full site. -Dr Haggis - Talk 18:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The website has been fixed for a while, now. Drakkenfyre 20:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And now it's down again. Seems that the domain might have been allowed to lapse. Not sure. Drakkenfyre (talk) 22:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: website broken

message: Well, considering we only keep an oral history of Con-Version, I guess we're hooped on Wikipedia. Hopefully someone doesn't go deleting everything. Drakkenfyre 20:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The old program books could be cited should it come to that. A "history" section of the conversion/csffs web page would also help. -Dr Haggis - Talk 18:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If only I had a volunteer to create the history section of the website . . . :) Drakkenfyre 22:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References or sources tag
Talk:Honden

message: What is the etymology behind Honden?   Are there any famous sound shifts that may have changed the word in the last thousand or more years?   What other words are plausibly related to it?   Were there once upon a time similarly sounding words (not ideographs, obviously) that might have once existed, but which have changed or even disappeared?
The main article could be improved by adding a paragraph about the descent of the word through the ages.   Yes, that is a difficult thing to do, seeing as how the language is misrepresented by series upon series of ideographs or logograms instead of phonetic characters.    216.99.219.108 (talk) 23:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology behind Honden 

message: Are the sacred buildings known as "honden" protected by municipal statutes in Japan, or are they protected by nationwide laws?
Are there any rules for establishing new "honden" or must they be kept in the place they were first built?   Is there a restriction on the number of such buildings that can be raised?  216.99.219.108 (talk) 23:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  land use statutes and honden
Talk:Murat (name)

message: a murat head is someone that is a poriwira and has 0 pubic hair  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.107.35 (talk) 18:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murat head 

message: This entry suggests all persons/places named "Murat" are derived from the Turkish name -- a matter not demonstrated.
--Al-Nofi (talk) 20:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murat etymology
Talk:Polaris (convention)

message: I've just had to purge a vast dump of information obviously taken from a convention flyer or the website. This article needs cleanup, and it needs actual sources (i.e., not items from the subject's own website). Stuff like this is why mundanes don't take articles about fandom seriously. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 17:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:VCON

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support - despite Jenni's obvious COI and use of blogposts (not a reliable source), this is a standard example of a local SF convention which is commonly and ordinarily known by a short name. Some other examples that I've attended in the past two years include Wiscon (the Wisconsin Science Fiction Convention and Conference), Chattacon, DucKon, Windycon, and ICON. None of these is commonly (or at all) referred to by any long and awkward handle. Thus, our own "principle of least astonishment" dictates that this article should be moved. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I would like to know how best to deal with the Conflict of Interest, Primary Sources and Verifiability issues for this page.
VCON is a long established event (2011 was our 40th anniversary) but is still relatively small, averaging about 600 members each year. We are not like a Dragon*Con or a GenCon which are large enough to have generated a multitude of outside references from established, reliable sources. The convention is  well known among Canadian science fiction and fantasy fandom, and has even hosted Canvention (the Canadian equivalent of Worldcon at which the Auroras are awarded to Canadian science fiction and fantasy authors and artists) but most articles that refer to the convention have been written by amateur authors for Fanzines and other personal publications. The result is that the majority of factual source material about the convention is found on VCON's own website.
Additionally the most likely people interested in maintaining this page are those, like myself, who are or who have been closely involved with the convention for some time.
I'd appreciate advice on how we can clean up the page as required by the other banners and then keep it up to date and accurate without making it necessary to leave the banners related to these specific issues on the page. Jenni Merrifield (talk) 21:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolving Conflict of Interest and use of Primary Sources Issues 

message: I would prefer to have a history table rather than just a GoH table.  But I'm not sure how to fix it.  In a previous article, I just started a second table rather than trying to reconcile what I wanted with what was already there.  But in this case, a history table (listing year, theme, location, etc) should have the GoH, and that's just confusion-inducing.  Besides, I don't know enough of the history.  I was a regular in the eighties, and on the board a couple of times, but have been away from Vancouver for more than a decade now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gossg (talk • contribs) 17:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:Stilpo

message: When I was looking for information about Stilpon, I found this article, but was very surprised by the word airadda. I doesn't look Greek, can't be found in any Greek dictionary and the only sites you can find on using google, cite the same text as can be found here in Wikipedia (except for a Sardic word). I suggest to delete the word, or, even better, to substitute it with the Greek term used by the Cynics. I could do it within the next week. 84.163.199.134 19:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Fin (disambiguation)

message: Maybe make a reference that "fin" is also the french word for "end"? It's pretty popular to add "fin" at the end of home videos or movies by none french speaking peoples. I know I do it.
-G — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.157.7 (talk) 19:10, 11 January 2007‎
----
Someone could also add FIN as Finland's ISO 3166-1 alpha-3-code. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.221.135.16 (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2007
----
Items #4 and #13 really are the same, aren't they. I suggest to include #4 in #13. Peeceepeh 07:35, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Tidyed up the rest of it too.--Father Goose 17:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2007
Talk:All-America City Award

message: Why don't we have past winners before 2005 listed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs302b (talk • contribs) 14:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Avman89 (talk) 03:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't there a link to the 2009 winners? 

message: Why is it called All-America City Award and not All-American City Award? Grammar issue! 93.219.173.154 (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  All-America or All-American? 

message: I have added 12 cities of 2012 in this table All-America_City_Award#The_winners. I think it's better to add years of award for multiple win cities. Please update. Thanks, New worl (talk) 10:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table updates 

message: In other words: Do you become an All-America City for one year or forever? And if it's the latter, can the title be revoked, e.g. in case of severe missmanagement? 2.203.201.61 (talk) 23:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: Partial retraction of the question. I see that some cities won more than once. So it doesn't seem to be a title you keep forever. 2.203.201.61 (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it an award or a title?