lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Poor Poor Pitiful Me

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Poor Poor Pitiful Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150525064956/http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19780318.html to http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19780318.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Ministry of finance

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to lowercase Ministry of finance (along with the other three). While there are (disputed) arguments that this is a proper name, and that this is actually a dab page in disguise (not disputed), a majority of posters agree that the article is about the general concept. Plus, there's the precedent at Talk:Ministry_of_Defence#Requested_move_5_February_2021.   No such user (talk) 11:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ministry of Finance →  – Article is about the generic institution and not any specific ministry of finance Primergrey (talk) 00:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Also, @Primergrey, I think it is rather bad form to split each ministry into separate RMs and force commentators to discover what other pages are being proposed to move, and repeat the same arguments elsewhere, forcing discussion to be fragmented and scattered across multiple pages. It is even poorer form not to even link to the other RMs here. The RMs should have been consolidated into one multiple-move request.  If possible, I'd like to request that all the individual RMs be closed and for @Primergrey reformulate his RM request as a multi-page move. Walrasiad (talk) 06:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose Proper name. – robertsky (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 February 2023
Talk:Carl W. Ackerman

message: The famous historical novelist Morgan Ilywellen claims that Ackerman was an informant for the British Government during the 1920s. V. Joe (talk) 16:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: British informant?=

message: Please would an interested editor review User:Timathom/Carl W. Ackerman, incorporate whatever is useful into this article, then blank the user page with ? – Fayenatic London 15:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft may be useful
Talk:Put Your Lights On

message: Hey Guys
I remember from a broadcast years ago that Santana said in an interview that he thought Put Your Lights On was really the heart of Supernatural.  My gut tells me it was during Supernatural Live, An Evening With Carlos Santana.  If anyone can find that interview, throw it up there.  I think it is very telling about the song's significance.
--Timt1006 (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santana quote
Talk:New York Amsterdam News Building

message: Is this the first use of this building? If not, when was it built?--Гатерас (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reluctant hero

message: Being a "Reluctant Hero" as have been described to me is ultimately a COWARD and should not be giving title of a Hero. If a person can subcome to a hero then one without a doubt be one at all times. The words used together is this definition felt unsettling and just did not go well together at all. Thinkaboutit2020 (talk) 10:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-reluctant Hero 

message: Thank you for clearing that up so quickly as well. Just needed help understanding the word completely. Very grateful for your time and help. Thinkaboutit2020 (talk) 10:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleared up
Talk:Acknowledgment index

message: The two papers cited here are also cited on Acknowlegment (creative arts and sciences). I wrote a sentence on that page to describe what those two papers were about (since they had nothing to do with the content). We can either remove them from that page or move this paragraph to that page, to consolidate the topic before developing it. (COI, none!). Valmataro (talk) 18:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to the page Acknowlegment (creative arts and sciences) 
Talk:Rawkfist

message: please provide an argument against the genre list if you wish to change itSaksjn (talk) 22:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genres
Talk:Real Life (Bon Jovi song)

message: I'm confused. In the Bon Jovi article, it says that David Bryan (the band's regular keyboard player) "was recovering from an accident in which he nearly severed his finger", so wouldn't it be a good idea (if someone can find a good source) to include a personnel list here?--71.200.109.219 (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who played the keyboards?
Talk:The Pink Panther (TV series)

message: I'm watching this episode right now on a recorded VHS tape that aired on YTV in Canada during the last week of October 1994. The copyright year on the episode is 1993. For some reason, it says on this page that it didn't air until February of 1995. I don't think the list on here is accurate in its airing schedule. Maybe someone should double check it with a TV Guide or something from the time. I quite seriously doubt that Canada aired it before the US when the copyright is from 1993.75.156.33.79 (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dino Sour Head 

message: should we put episode descriptions up on here? aside from episode names, the list is bare... Visokor (talk) 11:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode descriptions? 

message: "This decision was controversial and unpopular, and the Panther turned out to be a blabbering fool, despite the animation being well-done."
This comment on the reception of the series is unsourced (and if it can be sourced and deserves mentioning, wouldn't it belong under a separate "Reception" heading?) Additionally, the verbiage "blabbering fool" reads as somewhat opinionated and might need rephrasing to align with the NPOV policy. Dranther (talk) 20:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinionated language?
Talk:ACM Computing Reviews

message: http://www.reviews.com/search/search_results.cfm
--222.64.22.104 (talk) 01:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No editorial board is visible at the publication website 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Daniel

message: User:Daniel
      run at Tue Jan 23 05:52:17 2007 GMT
Category talk:	2
Category:	56
Image talk:	1
Image:	117
Mainspace	3532
Portal talk:	2
Portal:	245
Talk:	753
Template talk:	68
Template:	372
User talk:	4160
User:	2294
Wikipedia talk:	249
Wikipedia:	4048
avg edits per article	2.60
earliest	12:38, 26 May 2006
number of unique articles	6114
total	15899
2006/5 	1 	
2006/6 	101 	
2006/7 	2605 	
2006/8 	2356 	
2006/9 	2251 	
2006/10 	1854 	
2006/11 	2325 	
2006/12 	2030 	
2007/1 	2376 	
Daniel's editcount summary stats as of 05:52, January 23rd 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 05:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:American Family Physician

message: Bottom-right corner 
# Journal homepage - Updated link: http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp.html
# Online archives (1998–present) - Updated link: http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp/explore/past.html
And
# External links > Official website - Updated link: http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp.html
Usableweb (talk) 04:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here are some updates to out of date links
Talk:Arab Studies Quarterly

message: Journal exists, but lacks sourcing demonstrating that it is notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 17,500 results in books.google, and 7,000 hits in Google Scholar is not enough for you? Huldra (talk) 20:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Merda

message: MERDA is a portuguese word.
MIERDA is a spanish word.
Despite native speakers of both languages (more than 600 million), understand each other, the redirect shoudn't exist.
In the spanish article, all the listed words have portuguese equivalent in the meaning, but completly diffent in graphy. 
So, remove the redirect, please, and create a new entry for the word "merda" with all terms revised.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.214.59.197 (talk) 07:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Baltzer Science Publishers

message: Here's the parts of Lauren's recent work that might be salvageable:
"Baltzer Science Publishers BV was first started in 1980 under the name J.C. Baltzer AG. The owners of J.C. Baltzer AG sold the company in 1994. In 1994 its new owners renamed the company into Baltzer Science Publishers BV. This company was sold in may 2000 by its owners to Kluwer Academic Publishers. A few years later Kluwer Academic Publishers was sold by Kluwer NV to private investors who merged this company into Springer Verlag."
It is possible that there could be a completely separate article on the new company, containing this information:
In 2009 one of the previous owners of Baltzer Science Publishers started a new company under the same name Baltzer Science Publishers.  This new company has one of the previous owners as its sole owner and publishes also scientific and professional journals only.
IMO the rest of it (for example, whether Archive.org shows the old website) is irrelevant.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lauren's work

message: I removed the list of journals. These journals are currently published by a different publisher (Springer) and not this one. Hence, this list does not belong here without references. This section appears to be off topic. Also,  Notability is not inhertied. And this list is overdoing it anyway. WP is not an indiscriminate collector of information WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ----  Steve Quinn (talk} 06:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List of journals
Talk:Round Are Way

message: Where is your proof that Slade is an influence on Noel Gallagher's songwriting, and that for this reason, the title of this track was purposely spelled incorrectly?  Just because Oasis has covered Cum On Feel the Noize doesn't mean the rest of your (non-cited) statements are true. Hrhadam (talk) 12:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slade
Talk:Cancer Cell (journal)

message: I tagged the article with  per the users comments at Talk:Cell Press Anonymous101 (talk) 06:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Cell (journal)

message: To the anonymous IP who send me an email (a rather bigoted one, I have to say: "You need to stop imposing your own French viewpoints on the facts"). Your edits were reversed for the following reasons. 1/ It used more (and less clear) verbiage to say the same thing: that Cell is the third ranked journal after Nature and Science. 2/ The remark about Cell unlike Science or Nature not publishing short papers or letters is only comprehensible for someone familiar with bibliometrics and, apart from that, is unsourced WP:OR. 3/ Part of the edits was factually incorrect: the 2010 impact factors are not yet released (IFs are released in the summer of the next year, so the 2010 IFs will become available this summer). In addition, Nobel Prizes are not given for single papers. As you said in your email, they are given for discoveries, but those are often based on more than one paper. I hope this explains the reversion. As for the rest of your message: I agree that this article needs work and can be improved, I only reverted your edits because they were not improvements, as explained above. I also reverted this edit of yours at impact factor. It was internally inconsistent (it's a bit odd to say that the three most prestigious journals are Nature, Science, and Cell, when that is followed by a table in which the latter is ranked fifth) and also factually incorrect: Cell may well be one of the three most prestigious journals among scientists working in the fields that it covers. However, academics working in physics, astronomy, sociology, ecology, etc, will all agree about Science and Nature (which cover all these fields), but certainly not about Cell.
I have chosen to respond here, to keep things in the open. Before you respond or send me another email message, please read WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. Thanks. --Crusio (talk) 09:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent revert (March 19, 2011) 
Talk:Runnin' Down a Dream

message: There is this argentinian rock band called Los Súper Ratones who made a cover of this song with spanish lyrics. The song title was translated as "El sueño que viví" (El sueño que viví (YouTube video)). The song was made for a Tom Petty tribute album made by Record Label "Free pop Records" http://www.zonalibre.org/blog/surferrosa/archives/063774.html. It also appeared in a Los Súper Ratones DVD called "¡Urgente! Super Ratones" (http://www.superatones.com/discografia/2005.htm) as a bonus track.
Maybe this information could be added to the "Cover versions" section of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.235.205.107 (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentinian band "Los Súper Ratones" spanish cover 

message: How does the Rock Band DLC version not use a master track, or why does this have to be mentioned in this manner? --112.198.79.198 (talk) 15:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Guitar Hero 5 uses a Master Track"
Talk:Tokyo Sports

message: In Japan (Tokyo) , the Tokyo Sports is infamous for its misleadings.The guest editor, Takeshi Kitano is always spreading the irresponsible critics.
Some readers are enjoying the extreme commercial titlings . We find Crayon Shin-chan is commanding to the stewardess like the word ,"Neityan To Supo nai?"(Oh beautiful girl!Have you and Don't you sell the Tokyo Sports?)----The DQN,macbeth 07:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:S.A.T.O.

message: I've heard that the title means Sharon Arden Thelma Osbourne. Muttdog (talk) 06:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:Contemporary Sociology

message: What is the question - it should definitely be merged. Parkwells (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Peacock28 (talk) 01:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

text: *I have switched the two, so that the article is at the shorter title, without the (unneeded) dab. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 12:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Economics Letters

message: The article says "Economics letters has a notoriously slow turnaround time for submissions: often more than 8 months. Which is surprising given that the length of articles they receive is capped at 2000 words." The second sentence does not sound neutral. As for the first: It's a claim about a fact which I (and some others I know) know to be true from own experience. But without a source, I'm afraid the sentence should be deleted.
The Journal recevies articles which are less than 2000 words is a fact its on their webpage:
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505574/authorinstructions  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.44.248 (talk) 11:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnaround Time
Talk:Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

message: I don't understand the "see also" section. What is the relation between ENTCS and springers LNCS? Is the similiar name enough justification? What is the relationship between ENTCS and TCS? Despite its name, ENTCS publishes almost no theoretical computer science articles. Initially, maybe ENTCS started with publishing theoretical computer science articles, but nowadays they only collect as many workshop papers just to sell via science direct ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.131.181.137 (talk) 18:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Environmental Health Perspectives

message: I've restored some material from prior versions that apparently was lost in a major revision. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material restored 

message: It would be nice to have such an historical record...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frederic Y Bois (talk • contribs) 18:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Board of editors history
Talk:Foundations of Physics

message: Is it worth putting in some discussion of the "From the editor" piece on the website?  "There are controversies, differences of opinion, and sometimes even religious feelings which come into play. These should be discussed openly." and "Acceptation of a paper may not necessarily mean that all referees agree with everything." are somewhat unusual positions for the editor of a journal to take!  Djr32 (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments based on "From the editor"

message: I cleaned up the controversial claims section the other day so that the letter published by the editor corresponded to the papers submited to the journal.  If other controversial claims need to be listed, they need to be cited.  We can't just list a bunch of papers that have been submitted with controversial topics and then make a claim that the journal wishes it didn't do it. Akuvar (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial claims 

message: You probably can't answer this question, but I want to cite an article from this journal in the draft of an article.
I am a scientific skeptic who is using the concept of telepathy to highlight the profound nature of Bell's theorem in Draft:Bell's theorem paradox.  My disbelief in telepathy is essentially a faith in the open-mindedness of a sufficient fraction of the scientific community to investigate and corroborate any claim of that such abilities among humans can be established.  Having said that, Bell's theorem does establish that elementary particles are capable of what Wikipedia (correctly) calls Quantum pseudo-telepathy (although workers in the field often call it simply pseudo-telepathy).
This is an extremely difficult topic for me to research for a Wikipedia article because the number of websites (i.e. "noise") that support a non-scientific approach to telepathy outnumbers the number that support the scientific consensus (which Wikipedia does and should recognize)  In my literature search, I uncovered,
Josephson, Brian D., and Fotini Pallikari-Viras. "Biological utilization of quantum nonlocality." Foundations of Physics 21.2 (1991): 197-207.
I am an equation person and have little patience for long articles about something I already understand, but this sentence seems to summarize their attitude:
The authors reference: (7) H. L. Edge, R. L. Morris, J. Palmer, and J. H. Rush, Foundations of Parapsychology
(Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1986), and (8) D. I. Radin and R. D. Nelson, "Evidence for consciousness-related anoalies in random
physical systems," Found. Phys. 19, 1499-1514 (1989).
--Yours truly Guy vandegrift (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How reliable is this paper?
Talk:Active tip-clearance control

message: This article could really benefit from a high-level introduction, and possibly a sentence along the lines of "during normal flight, the engine warms up and the turbine casing expands, creating a small (XYZ mm) gap between the casing and the tips of the spinning compressor blades.  Air leaking around, past the edge of the blades without passing through them reduces engine and fuel efficiency.  One approach to reduce the gap is by cooling the turbine casing uses a stream of cold air.  This cool air can be supplied by taking it from the by-pass valve, as found on the EJ200 and FOO and BAR engines." Although this is only my guess and it would be preferable if such an improvement could be written by somebody familiar with the topic who can fill in the correct details!  —Sladen (talk) 04:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Set Me Free (The Kinks song)

message: Was there at one point an alternate title for this track of "Set Me Free Little Girl"? I found a reference to an old 45RPM release from 1965 on discogs. Was this at one point an alternate title, or is it just a printing gaffe? If so it may be notable to include here. 2607:F598:B77A:90:D8C5:6ED1:5404:7F5E (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Title?
Talk:Sex Type Thing

message: The music for the Doom games are based on popular Heavy Metal songs, and this is one of the basis for the second one. Should we put that it was covered for Doom 2 on the list in the section "Appearences in Other Media"? --ConCass (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  S.T.T. in Doom 2 
Talk:Intercultural Pragmatics

message: In regard to the academic impact information which seems intended to denigrate the journal: No academic journal is included in Thompson ISI until it has been in the market for at least 5 years. Thompson started to count the impact factor of "Intercultural Pragmatics" only in September 2009. The first impact factor for the journal will be revealed for 2010 in the spring of 2011.Neddanison (talk) 10:58, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rewritten the article, removing the information on the impact factor etc. that the journal does not yet have, as it didn't add anything substantial. Once the impact factor is revealed, it will be added to the article. --Kajervi (talk) 11:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:International Affairs (journal)

message: The article was expanded by WP:SPA, but sadly, this rewrite is clearly promotional, with wording in lead such as ' highly regarded ', 'leading journal'. Only the 'featured work by some of the leading figures in global politics and academia' claim seems substantiated, the rest is rather subjective, and even so the word leading (used twice in the lead at some point) is hardly neutral. A good chunk of the history is WP:OR/WP:PRIMARY. Wikipedia is not the place to publish an essay about a history or importance of the journal. If a journal board want to write such an item up, they should have it published in a peer review outlet that is preferably not their own journal (through I'll note that when I wrote the entry for the International Sociological Association, I used a non-peer reviewed study published by ISA itself, since nobody else bothered to discuss ISA's significance/history in-depth). User:Randykitty suggested we remove all the OR/PRIMARY stuff; I am not so sure - it seems moderately useful, if promotional/ORish. The journal is notable, the question is can we keep the entry that is in the end not based on required independent sources? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional tone
Talk:Lower Plenty Football Club

message: Please see this edit for more information
--ForgottenHistory (talk) 00:40, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertainty 

message: If anyone knows the reason, it would be helpful to explain why the club played in the Southern Football League for two years. This seems very peculiar for a club from the outer northern suburbs. Aspirex (talk) 04:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation requested 