Template talk:User fil

message: The following discussion was imported from Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:User_fil
*Comment. I suggest using  rather than  for consistency with other userboxes. --Mithril Cloud 12:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On left and right

message: I guess several categories have to be created. I'd like it to be linked this way:
 --Howard the Duck 05:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Links are good, categories have been created way before. Kindly see Category: User fil { PMGOMEZ } 05:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that one link is red. --Howard the Duck 05:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix it. { PMGOMEZ } 06:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. So can it be applied now? --Howard the Duck 06:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may apply it but the fil-N category page isn't done. { PMGOMEZ } 07:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything else? You may create one if you wish. --Howard the Duck 07:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Once I'm free from these endless debates. { PMGOMEZ } 07:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Saw the change, yet other levels not changed. Please implement across all. { PMGOMEZ } 07:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may do it yourself, it's relatively easy, you'd just copy all of the contents of the template page, go to its sister templates, and modify some letters/characters, unless all you do is to revert things, and ensure Infobox Philippine High Schools won't be deleted. I'm busy on expanding other articles. --Howard the Duck 12:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an entirely separate matter from Infobox Philippine High School. WP:NPA { PMGOMEZ } 15:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did I attack you? Instead of ranting, just do it. --Howard the Duck 15:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "unless all you do is to revert things, and ensure Infobox Philippine High Schools won't be deleted." you do it. { PMGOMEZ } 16:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No personal attacks were made. Howard has a point. He's indeed busy with other articles while you're mostly focused at talk pages and reverting to IPHS at the moment. You know what needs to be added to IPHS the best, and you can do the editing yourself. --Mithril Cloud 02:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I shall add more stuff to IPHS. :) { PMGOMEZ } 02:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

text: (Indent reset) You misunderstood Mithril, what needs to be done is to transfer all of the functions of IPHS to ISS so that IPHS can be deleted already. --Howard the Duck 04:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that. But you know what will happen if I suggest that. Oh and, things went off-topic already, my mistake for mentioning the ISS-IPHS dispute again. --Mithril Cloud 06:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that. However, could there be a way in which you can choose the option on what orientation you'll use? --Howard the Duck 14:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess what, I did it. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.................... zzzzzzzzzzzzzz --Howard the Duck 14:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoa, it worked! Nice job! Now that solves the left-right dispute. And we can now put this template on left orientation since the ones who prefer right can just use  instead. :D --Mithril Cloud 14:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linked elements