Talk:Hobart Airport

message: I've taken these pictures which somebody might be able to incorporate into the article.
:Image:Hobart Airport 2.JPG  :Image:Hobart Airport 4.JPG
-- Adz|talk 13:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: good work, this site has needed a pic of this quality for some time. I added one of the pics you submitted. Wiki ian 11:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Can anyone provide a picture of the airport from Tower Hill to provide a good view of the terminals and runway? Wiki ian 08:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: :Image:HBT DFO.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:HBT DFO.png

message: :The top text mentioned that Singapore Airways used 777 equipment into HBA, theres no chance it was a 777 it would not take off fully laden.  It was a 757 charter aircraft. 220.253.104.162 22:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the exception of the Airbus A380 any passenger plane in the world currently operating can land and take-off at Hobart airport, this is confirmed on their website. Also The Boeing 767 (which is comparable to the Boeing 777 in size) has landed and taken off fully laden many times from Hobart airport. Also if you look up Singapore Airlines you'll see they have no Boeing 757 planes in service. Wiki ian 05:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The 757 aircraft was chatered for the flight and was not a SIA fleet jet.  The 767 is not comparable to a 777 as the later is far heavier - the MTOW for a 767 is 142,800kgs and a 777 is 247,100kgs.  A 777-200 could land at HBA but they have never tried to -  any other varienat could not as their take-off run at MTOW is too far, the reference to that on the page is a blatant misstatement - please report times, airlines, and dates of 777 take-offs and landings at HBA and I will beleive you.  An aircraft of that size would be newsworthy in Hobart but I have never heard of it occuring, either has Australian Aviation magazine .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.238.12 (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Well said, if you check the Airport's Homepage and look at their masterplans, under the runway section you'll see both 747 and 777 aircraft have landed and taken off from the airport under weight restrictions. Wiki ian 02:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies

message: Does anyone have the current passenger figures as the 1.6 million was a couple of years ago. Aaroncrick(Tassie talk) 00:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passenger stats 

message: As requested by User:Wiki ian, I performed a review of the article for the Class B criteria, specifically for WikiProject Aviation.  Before I get into the nitty-gritty details, let me say that I can tell you've been busy and that you've read the relevant guidelines.  Most of the problems I found are related to link rot on web sites used as references.
* b1 Referencing & citations - no/needs attention (after corrections, became yes)
** Some of the references (including all of the ones from the Mercury) have become dead links: "Hobart Airport $100m sale near", "PDF file 2004 Master Plan", "Hobart Airport sale reaps $350m" (Mercury), "$8m motel plan for Hobart Airport site", "PDF file Development Plan", "Ministerial Conditions of Approval", "Huge DFO trading by next year", "Airport Set For Boom Travel".  If possible a new URL should be found for each of them.  If there is no updated URL available any more for any given one, don't remove the reference but just mark it as a "dead link" in the reference.
** The reference "Hobart Airport sale reaps $350m" (IAG) does not match the title of the page it links to, but does support the text where it is cited.  It looks like a cut & paste which was not completely updated.
** other references checked OK
* b2 Coverage & accuracy - yes
** follows guidelines in WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT
* b3 Structure - yes
** follows guidelines in WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT
* b4 Grammar & style - no/needs attention (after corrections, became yes)
** The "Hotel" section reads like an advertisement with too many adjectives.  Things like "spacious", "contemporary", and too many details about the rooms can be removed.  Also, the fact that there is a service station is too much detail for the encyclopedic-level view.
* b5 Supporting materials - yes
** good use of pictures
* accessibility - yes, but minor issues could use attention:
** There is inconsistent use of unit conversions in the article. Generally km are converted to miles.  But hectares and square meters are not converted English units.
** The Skytraders destination Casey Station should have a parenthesized "(Antarctica)" since assuming it's in Australia would be incorrect.  And it should become a wiki link.
* comments
** The "Landing patterns and approach" section probably should be removed.  Airport articles generally do not have information about air traffic control procedures because it is something passengers never see. And pilots know where to look it up without Wikipedia.  With that deleted, the content of the "Runway" subsection would become the "Operations" section without a subheading.
** The reference "Melbourne Centre" does not need the note that it's "in en-au".  This entire article is expected to be in Australian English since it's about a place in Australia, as per WP:ENGVAR. But this point is moot since the previous suggestion will remove that text and reference.
** The "Access" section should focus more on the types of ground transportation available rather than driving directions from the CBD.  Local residents probably already know where the airport is.  So those unfamiliar would be coming from the airport initially - and rental car companies probably would have already offered them a map if they don't have a GPS.
Overall this is an excellent effort.  I don't think it will take long to fix.  Once the issues are fixed, we can re-visit the B-class review. Ikluft (talk) 07:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: all of the above has been fixed. If this is now suitable for B class status, please leave feedback on how I can get it to GA class, if not please leave feedback on how I can get it to B Class. Cheers Wiki ian 10:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I looked through the text and references.  I agree that the Class B criteria have been met.  I'll edit the assessment to reflect it. Ikluft (talk) 08:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class review for [[WP:AVIATION|WikiProject Aviation]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Hobart International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101119191956/http://airservicesaustralia.com/projectsservices/reports/movements/finlytd09_10.pdf to http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/projectsservices/reports/movements/finlytd09_10.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091013224032/http://www.hobartairport.com.au/images/Hobart%20International%20Airport%202009%20Preliminary%20Draft%20Master%20Plan.pdf to http://www.hobartairport.com.au/images/Hobart%20International%20Airport%202009%20Preliminary%20Draft%20Master%20Plan.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091005065633/http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/97/Files/Avline_13.pdf to http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/97/Files/Avline_13.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090706114113/http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/24/Files/Domestic%20Airline%20Activity%20Annual%20%20publication%20200708.pdf to http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/24/Files/Domestic%20Airline%20Activity%20Annual%20%20publication%20200708.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hobart International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708091113/http://www.brandtasmania.com/newsletter.php?ACT=story&issue=56&story=5 to http://www.brandtasmania.com/newsletter.php?ACT=story&issue=56&story=5
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are conflicting statements on this page. In the lede it says the airport was privatised in 1988, while the Privitisation section states it occurred in June 1998. Which one is it? 1.136.106.101 (talk) 00:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998 or 1988?