Talk:Party of Democratic Action

message: :Image:SDAflag.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SDAflag.gif

message: Regarding recent edit-warriors, let's see how many sources one can find about this party having a (Muslim/Bosniak) nationalist platform:
*"Nationalists win Bosnia's elections" (AFP, 13 October 2014)
*"Nationalists with divided goals extend hold over Bosnia in vote" (Reuters, 13 October 2014 - this one is even accompanied by a picture of a guy celebrating SDA victory by waving SDA party flag in central Sarajevo)
*"Nationalists likely winners in Bosnian election" (Associated Press, 13 October 2014)
*"Divided nationalists win Bosnia elections" (Al Jazeera, 13 October 2014)
*"Bosnian nationalists pull ahead as election results come in" (BBC, 13 October 2014 - this one is illustrated by a picture of SDA president Bakir Izetbegović)
*"Nationalists Win Majority in Bosnia’s Elections" (Voice of America, 13 October 2014 - another portrait of SDA president accompanying the article)
*"Bosnia elections: nationalists from rival ethnic groups claim victory" (The Guardian, 13 October 2014)
*"Bosnia Election Results Seal Nationalists'  Triumph" (Balkan Insight, 28 October 2014)
*"Victory for the nationalists in the presidential and general elections in Bosnia-Herzegovina" (Fondation Robert Schumann, 21 April 2002)
Timbouctou (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalist party

message: What is your objection with the sources?
Marko Babić has a PhD in law and is a judge of the Croatian Constitutional Court. Brian R. Farmer has a PhD in political science from the Texas Tech University. Muhamed Filipović has a PhD in philosophy and is member of the Academy of Sciences and Arts. So they are not "politicians and journalists" as you said, User:The Destroyer Of Nyr. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 15:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And rest of the authors? Are they also communists? --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 22:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

text: No. Seems you have no idea what Islamism is. It includes vast specter of ideologies. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

text: The sources say so. Any discussion outside a sourced frame would be original research, where I do not want to engage. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 23:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: These are just a couple of cherry-picked sources, some of which clearly authored by fringe figures. The infobox should only list undisputed things. Of course, the article main text can mention one or two of your sources, as the Serb side frequently made such allegations, in a red herring fallacy manner. Phil. Phil070707 (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides Bosniak nationalism, which ideology of the party remains undisputed? There's not one source that would suggest that the PDA is for the "Islamic demoracy" (another form of Islamism), or that it is "pro-Europeanist". Still, you have added those in the infobox. There is a history of this party being Islamist, even openly. They supported jihadist volunteers in the Bosnian-Herzegovinian Army and they had and still have a strong Islamist faction in the party. President of the SDA in Tuzla and history professor at the University of Tuzla, as well as member of the parliament, wrote about PDA's goal to create a state based on Islam -  --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 17:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamism 

message: This article about the SDA party is extremely biased.
It's basically what OTHERS are saying about the party, and not what the party actually stands for in its program.
The article is full of half-truths, hearsay, and nonobjective perpectives, but since there are links to shady sources that were written by detractors and islamophobes, it's considered "credible".
If I link the party's program and translate the main points, will that be enough to remove the "islamist" label? There's absolutely NOTHING in their program that would justify to label them as so-called "islamists".
The-Bosniak (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extremely biased and islamophobic