lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James D. Bales

message: This article currently contains many errors in spelling and grammar.  More importantly, it also cites no significant scholarship.  However, I happen to know that such scholarship exists, so I won't delete the page.  Instead, I call for others to help with the revision process.  Bales's racists comments about Martin Luther King should be included here as well.  Josh a brewer (talk) 02:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rough start

message: This article seems to be rather unsubtly slanted in Bales' favor, indeed going out of its way to praise him. Stonemason89 (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Hush harbor

message: There is sooooo much scholarly research, especially today, on the existence and proliferation of hush harbors, but potential black contributors are so exhausted by the bias attacks of legitimate Black publishing sources by the 90+% white male contributor community that no one cares to participate.  Wikipedia you have a racism problem AND you don't care. 🤷🏾‍♂️ Gjone1 (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article represents the tragedy of the white supremacist nature of Wikipedia
Talk:52nd Street station (SEPTA Regional Rail)

message: The Philadelphia Inquirer had an article in 2009 on how deteriorated the overpasses at 52nd Street are. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do they still have that link? A lot of newspaper websites kill their links. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  23:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deteriorated overpasses 

message: Is this station considered to be in West Parkside, Carroll Park, or some other neighborhood? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  00:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact West Philadelphia neighborhood 

message: Amtrak stopped here, but apparently so did Conrail commuter trains (cf this post from Cameron Booth). An article in Railroad magazine from 1974 says it had 11 trains out to the Main Line in the mornings (it also said the station was built circa 1850, so who knows). This station would seem to more properly belong to the commuter network than Amtrak, particularly given that the Silverliner Service was making a single outbound pickup in 1974, and the same in 1979. Mackensen (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, for some reason, I thought Amtrak had served it longer, but it appears not. I've no objection to a move if you have a good name for it. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not opposed to returning to the Pennsylvania Railroad disambiguator; they built it and used it longer than anyone. The station's unimportant compared to 52nd Street station (SEPTA). Mackensen (talk) 02:13, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I'm trying to understand the circumstances that led to the image I just added to the infobox. GG1s weren't normally used for suburban service, and I don't know why one would have ended up on the upper level at 52nd Street. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:43, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:Passagianism

message: Re amalgamating Pasagians and Passagianism, I presume that Pasagians and Passagians are the same, but do not know which is the correct spelling. Hugo999 (talk) 00:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently both spellings are in use, with the double s a little more common. The book used as a source at Pasagians uses the spelling with one s, while other books use the other. At Google Scholar, "Passagians" and "Passagini" outperform "Pasagians" and "Pasagini", but the latter spellings are also used. The Summa contra haereticos gives quite a variety of spellings. "Passagianism", on the other hand, generates not a single Google Scholar hit (neither does "Pasagianism"). My suggestion would be to move the "Pasagians" article, which is in better shape than this one, to "Passagians", to note the alternative spelling in the moved article, and to thurn this one into a redirect. The Summa paragraph from this article should probably be merged. Huon (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I would use the double s spelling, per Huon. However, I would choose this article to be the destination of the merge. Movements, and not the members of movements, seem to be article titles. See Arians redirecting to Arianism. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 02:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling?
Talk:Patrologia Latina

message: I added the table of contents and would see more sense in the linking of notable authors from this table instead of separate list (as the article has now). If no one objects I probably will start doing it some time. → Aethralis 14:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this would be an improvement. You might find this list easier to work from: . Rwflammang (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that would be better. Originally the list was anyone I could find who had an article here, who were much fewer in number at the time. Adam Bishop (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Is the Table of Contents complete? I know the PL takes up much of a wall in the library so it seems like there must be more authors in it. Adam Bishop (talk) 00:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is nearly complete, excluding but the most obscure authors. Here is the complete TOC. I think it would be wise to add some of these as they gain articles in wikipedia, but as for now most of the unnamed ones do not have any. → Aethralis 09:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

text: You are quite right. Deleted. → Aethralis 19:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of contents 

message: It would be worth adding links for all the authors, I think. I was in effect able to construct articles of some sort for all those present in the ToC as given here. The conclusion is that the criteria for being in the Table were adequate. We could afford to have the other authors there, now. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I don't think we need the "notable authors" section anymore...everyone can be in the table, red-links or not. Adam Bishop (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree also. → Aethralis 20:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree. Iblardi (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More redlinks

message: I assume that link should read Pope Pelagius, not Pelagius himself? I'm not 100% certain, so figured I'd ask... Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  20:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean volume 21, that one does have a bibliographical note about Pelagius 'of Britain' (). Iblardi (talk) 20:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pelagius?

message: Any particular reason why he is mentioned twice for volumes 3-5. Are his works really included in these volumes? Why is he considered a Latin father? Rwflammang (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: this was noted in 2009, and he was still mentioned twice now. I have removed the duplication. He is in PL with some letters, I suppose either because he wrote them in Latin, or because they have only been preseved in Latin. --dab (𒁳) 14:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dionysius of Alexandria
Talk:Patrologia Orientalis

message: If anyone can tell me what needs doing to the list of volumes and contents, I'd be happy to do it.  The tag doesn't tell me much.  Roger Pearse 09:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag was posted by Dbachmann, so you can ask him for more specifics.  My thoughts are that the Manual of Style might give some help, but at the very least there should be consistency within the section.  There is an obvious format change after volume 41.  The vast majority of the section is not in English, which is another significant problem, because this is the English language wikipedia.  GRBerry 13:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note.  Oh well, probably best to just delete it.  I don't know that translating the titles of the volumes into English would be a good idea, tho.Roger Pearse 17:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: However imperfect the list is worth keeping.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 18:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify
Talk:Christianity in Eastern Arabia

message: This article contains no information on the present status of Christians in the Persian Gulf. It is rather entirely historical. It may have been edited to remove information on Christians presently in the Gulf, as their presence is anathema to much of the Muslim population there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.91.187.194 (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Radical Pietism

message: I've changed the article to show that "du" is equivalent to "thou," not "you." It is erroneous to think that "you" would be familiar- at this time, "you" was the respectful term in English, paralleling the continental custom of addressing superiors with the second-person plural. Thus, the Quakers made a point of addressing each other as "thou," not "you," for the same reason as the German pietists. In contemporary everyday English, "you" eventually supplanted "thou" completely, because no one wanted to appear disrespectful of anyone by addressing him as "thou." TheEvilPanda (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thou," not "You" for "Du" 

message: That there were some radicals among the pietists does not warrant their separation into a separate page. A very similar movement, the Anabaptist movement, does not have a similar page. I suspect this page for radical pietists has been set up for the sake of putting distance between someone's group and the more radical elements in their heritage. This article should be integrated into the main article on Pietism. That said, prominent Brethren historian Carl Bowman does use the term. 
Ciacg (talk) 04:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radical Pietism vs. Pietism
Talk:American Lamancha goat

message: When the copyvio matter settles out and the new text emerging at the temp page is substituted for this page's current content, I'd prefer that the title be (the correct name as registered): Lamancha goat without parenthesis, like at least some of the other goat breed pages are.  (Kiko goat Boer goat Saanen goat Toggenburg goat Alpine goat (which is still parenthentical like this one) Alpine (goat) Nubian goat.  It may be that this can be simply done now, by starting such a page, but I'll wait for comment. duff 17:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like your move proposal is uncontested; to retitle the article, all you need to do is move it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay great.  That is also . Moved to American Lamancha goat (the proper name), and created new page for the Spanish ancestor-goat, La Mancha goat (its correct spelling, caps, spacing).  duff 02:11, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change proposed LaMancha (goat)-->Lamancha goat
Talk:Sanbenito

message: What Spanish word is that? I wasn't able to find "fuego repolto" on Spanish-language sites. However History of the Holy Catholic Inquisition (1831) has it. Is this a 180 year old typo for "revolto"?--88.73.11.62 (talk) 13:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''repolto''?
Talk:Synod of Arles

message: Section  currently reads that "it passed twenty-two canons concerning Easter", but the sentence is ambiguous: Were those 22 really all concerning Easter, or is Easter just the first of an enumeration? The format of a bulleted list, in which I'm collecting the outcomes now, does not allow such ambiguity. Since there is no source, I will therefore remove this ambiguous wording; if someone can resolve the ambiguity, please feel free to re-add the information. — Sebastian 10:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twenty-two canons concerning Easter
Talk:Council of Epaone

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but this and Council of Epaon appear to be the same council - rst20xx (talk) 01:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks that way, same year, similar spelling, same content for Canon 26. Pbhj (talk) 02:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 
Talk:Imperial German Army

message: The article lacks information about war crime and atrocities comitted by German Empire's Army, for example the Herero  Genocide,Pogrom of Kalisz, Massacres of Belgian civilians.
--Molobo (talk) 23:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of  information regarding genocide, war crimes and atrocities made by this German military 

message: I would like also to clarify the fact that there are genocide of Maji Maji of 1896 to be specified but also highlight the fact that the German imperial army was involved, apart from in some cases, in exemplary fashion, and that the Belgian massacre of civilians was a horrible massacre and unjustifiable but we have to denote how you can not remember only the negative aspects but also those of positives.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.11.106.46 (talk) 17:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The german's atrocities 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I added source and wikilinks.--Molobo (talk) 11:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added 

message: My grandfather left Germany in 1891 for Cleveland, Ohio. His parents, 5 siblings, and in-laws joined him through 1899. My family said that being dragged into the army back then was a brutal affair. It wasn't for the three years in and 4 years reserves that this article says, but for many more years at poverty wages. Low ranking men were trapped in a system for years on end where they could not even afford to marry, so many men fled Germany rather than face conscription. 
Which version is the more accurate - my grandfather's or this article's? Is there no truth at all in the immigrants' viewpoint?
Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Anybody home? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 21:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What it was like for conscripts..... 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: German Army (German Empire) →  – The title "Imperial German Army" is more likely WP:COMMONNAME than German Army (German Empire) 49.150.100.127 (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 October 2021 

message: There was an Imperial Navy, but there NEVER was an "Imperial Army". Only ignorant Anglo-Saxons can claim such a nonsense. --Reibeisen (talk) 15:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Article
Talk:Airborne transmission (version 2)

message: After adding in some related links that lead to this article, I request for its status as an orphaned article come under review. The only link I was unable to add was on Chiroptera (bat), can someone else do it for me? (No, I don't have a Wikipedia account due to a lack of time on my hands).
Thanks in advance!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.14.170 (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status as an orphaned article
Talk:Absolutism (European history)

message: I want to have this article labeled as a stub so it has the opportunity for expansion - how do I do that?
:Go to the page :Category:Stub categories and locate the one that is most appropriate.  Copy it at the bottom of the article (be sure to include the curly braces).  That will put it in the stub category where someone will spot it.  ... discospinster talk 03:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st post
Talk:RAF Twinwood Farm

message: This appears to have been copied from the following site http://www.yourtotalevent.com/places/Bedfordshire/2wwairfields.htm  --Pandaplodder (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

message: This section seriously unbalances the article, and was frankly unreadable. I added paragraph breaks for readability, but frankly it needs to be condensed. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 06:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glen Miller 

message: From the article:
:In March 1943 North American Mustangs belonging to 164, 169, 239 and 208 Squadrons RAF engaged in Operation Spartan which occurred between 1 and 12 March 1943 was conducted across southern and central England to test a wide range of procedures and tactics of British and Canadian Forces.
So, what were these procedures and tactics? Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 06:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Spartan
Talk:Danny Little Bear

message: This is the 3rd paragraph in the Early Career section, "Losing to Wildman Phillips and Calvin Schmidt (the Indobear) at the Ponce de Leon Ball Park in Atlanta, Georgia on June 5, he also teamed with Ron Reed in a tag team match against Johnny Heidman and Dick Dunn and in a singles match faced The Destroyer later that month.[1] Danny Bregman is an aboriginal."  Who is Danny Bregman? That name doesn't appear anywhere earlier in the article.  Was that Little Bear's real last name? Jtyroler (talk) 19:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Career
Talk:All-American Girl Racing

message: Would someone like to create a new page for Robyn Gordon? Presently, the page redirects to a Grevillea cultivar. Mastercampbell (talk) 03:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Robyn Gordon
Talk:Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-day Adventists

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. I support that, right now it's where Georgia-Cumberland Conference of Seventh-Day Adventist redirects to the current article. I agree that church name should be in there. Hatmatbbat10 (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Does anybody think that this article should be upgraded to start class, since i added some History and list of Presidents I though it really wasn't a stub anymore. Just a thought. Hatmatbbat10 05:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Rating
Talk:Bankruptcy alternatives

message: Does anyone know if you can keep your 401K retirement monies when filing for bankruptcy, or is it an asset and used up to pay off your debt?
Bankruptcy Alternatives for Distressed Companies   
If anyone is interested in a posting regarding further information on bankruptcy alternatives for distressed companies and how to approach them, please indicate here.HoulihanLokey (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nevada National Guard

message: Dear , do we have enough on the 221st Cavalry Regiment (United States) to create an article? Buckshot06 (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  221st Cavalry
Talk:Boys' schhool of st. pauls'

message: The CSD notice provides little indication as to what exactly needs to be rectified to make this article acceptable. Assuming this page is not a copyvio, it seems like a message on the contributor's talk page or this talk page might be more useful. At first glance, it appears to be an essay written for school submitted by a user inexperienced with wiki markup. I ran some phrases through google and came up with no matches, so it doesn't appear to be a copyvio. Sarsaparilla (talk) 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paul A. Rothchild

message: Paul was named after Paul Revere, as he was born on April 18, the date attributed to Revere's ride in the famous Longfellow poem of that name.  I knew him growing up in Teaneck.  My brother, who was a very good friend of Paul's, paraphrased the poem something like this:  "On the 18th of April in '35. Many a man is now alive, who remembers that [supply your own adjective] day and year." 
What a great shame he died so young. Apace361 (talk) 03:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What album or single did Rothchild produce for Neil Young?  I believe this to be an error.Cbben (talk) 09:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neil Young?
Talk:Lindenhurst, New York

message: A good source for the history of Nazis in Lindenhurst is "Wunderlich's Salute: The interrelationship of the German-American Bund, Camp Siegfried, Yaphank, Long Island, and the Young Siegfrieds and their relationship with American and Nazi institutions," by Marvin D. Miller. Most of the material covers Yaphank, but Lindenhurst isn't overlooked in this book either. Just a thought. ----DanTD (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lindenhurst Nazis 

message: It is the 4th largest village in New York State.
Does this mean it is the 4th largest village by land area or by population?
My guess is population, but it isn't clear.
--JBC3 (talk) 09:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If it refers to population, a better descriptor would be "fourth most populous." Rob T Firefly (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, clarified accordingly! --JBC3 (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for clarification 
Talk:Saltaire, New York

message: Although I didn't tag the article with it, certain information may in fact be out of date. The government section lists the board of trustees and the history section lists fire chiefs. --JBC3 (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  May require updating 

message: I was told that it takes its name from the town of Saltaire, which itself is based on the name of Sir Titus Salt, who built his mills on the River Aire in England. Can anyone else provide a citation? BrotherSulayman (talk) 02:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:North Babylon, New York

message: There are a number of entries in the notable residents section that are not cited. We often let blue linked people in a notable residents section slide, but it has resulted in a full bio being added recently, so it deserves some attention. Also most notable resident sections provide only minimal information on each person, so it may be a good idea to trim this one down about. Monty845 19:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Residents section
Talk:Battle of Chelsea Creek

message: "Aftermath" section is to come. I suspect that the best reference discussing this little-known battle is Tentindo's work for the Revere Historical Commission: http://www.amazon.com/Battle-Chelsea-Creek-May-1775/dp/B0006CZP20/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207314399&sr=8-3 but according to WorldCat there don't seem to be many copies of this that are easily available. I'll take a look at the one in the Peabody Essex Museum when I have the time. Flying Jazz (talk) 13:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath
Talk:New Fiction

message: I think I cited everything properly. What needs to be done now to avoid deletion? PR0D1GY 31 (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You cited correctly - the problem is that the text is copied word-for-word from another site, which is a copyright violation. I've removed the copied material; try rewriting it in a way that isn't a direct lift off of another website and it should be just fine. Tijuana Brass (talk) 07:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Beatty Secondary School

message: These 2 schools completed a merger with effect from Jan 2017. Resultant school keep english name of "Beatty Secondary School", while keeping Chinese Name of Balestier Hill Secondary School (博理中学). 
See: 
* 
* 
Muggershell (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with [[Balestier Hill Secondary School]]
Talk:Karl Hundason

message: Please don't bother rating this artice until User:Billreid has had a chance to work on it. Bill has a longer version in a sandbox which I assume he'll want to add here, or perhaps replace this article with that one. Thanks, Angus McLellan  (Talk) 04:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll watch for a new version. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 13:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating