Talk:Humanist Manifesto I

message: Um, sorry? --153.9.7.77 (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed this phrase for three reasons. First, saying that Human Manifesto I is historic only incorrectly suggests the other manifestos are not historical in nature. All of the manifestos are historic documents. They have all been created at particular moments in history. They all reflect the views of the authors and signers at particular moments in history. Second, saying that Humanist Manifesto I is historic only suggests the other manifestos are something more than historic. What is this something more? Divine inspiration? Third, saying that Humanist Manifesto I is historic only implies that its content is out-of-date...that it is something believed in times past but no longer believed today. This is definitely a personal point of view.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.214.42.64 (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "rendering the first manifesto a historic document only."

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Humanist Manifesto I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050418064219/http://www.infidels.org:80/library/modern/edwin_wilson/manifesto/index.shtml to http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/edwin_wilson/manifesto/index.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Humanist Manifesto I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107221355/http://www.americanhumanist.org/who_we_are/about_humanism/Humanist_Manifesto_I to http://www.americanhumanist.org/who_we_are/about_humanism/Humanist_Manifesto_I
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The linked magazine is published in the UK and, although founded in 1885, has only had that name since 1972. 
The New Humanist which published HM1 was edited in Chicago by Edwin H Wilson, one of the authors and signees of HM1. 
Sorry to say, I do not have more information about that magazine. As far as I could learn, the two magazines are conflated [almost?] everywhere on the internet. Jocanfan (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link is to the wrong magazine called New Humanist 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/manifesto1/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.   – Isochrone (talk) 00:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed