Talk:Metal Box

message: OK, so what I've written is totally inadequate, but I couldn't believe there wasn't already an article.  I almost wondered if it wasn't already there for a reason - like it's bad luck or something. Gyrofrog 07:23, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: totally inadequate

message: I originally set up Second Edition as a re-direct to Metal Box.  But since Second Edition has its own album cover, I decided it deserved its own article after all, if only as a placeholder for its Wikiproject Albums table.
Any further information about Metal Box or Second Edition that isn't specifically about the latter should probably go in the Metal Box article.
Gyrofrog 21:47, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged the two articles.  I've left Talk:Second Edition as-is. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Metal Box vs. Second Edition?

message: I feel there is not enough to justify the two seperate articles, so would support a merge. Both covers pics could still be used, and any onfo not otherwise in the Metal Box article (which should remain the article header, with a redirect from Second Edition).LessHeard vanU 21:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged the two articles.  I've left Talk:Second Edition as-is. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of Articles

message: The following text refers to this article's previous content, which has been merged to Super Mario 64.
I've just looked at Super Mario 64, and the most of this information is already there (though the object is referred to as "Green Block" rather than "Metal Box").  Also, I'm wondering about moving contents of  Metal Box (disambiguation) to this article, instead of changing this article to an automatic redirect (but then what do we do with the existing disambig page, redirect it to this article?). That way, anyone who types in "Metal Box" while looking for Metal Box (album) won't get redirected to Super Mario 64 (where it wouldn't make any sense to put "For other uses, see Metal Box (disambiguation)").  Or move Metal Box (album) here.  (And in the time it took me to write about this, I could have gone ahead and done it, but I thought it better to ask first.)  Comments? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 05:22, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous Content

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 21:14, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: Smiloid 09:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...but Johnny Rotten did!LessHeard vanU 20:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: John Lydon did not actually hate Pink Floyd!

message: I just noticed that the Metal Box CD I've had for several years had it's label misprinted as "This is what you want ... this is what you get" (which is really confusing since I own that CD as well, and they look identical). It's tracklisting is the same, but still.
I also saw one review on Amazon of someone who had also got a copy with that misprint, now I wonder if it's an error that is on most of the copies or if I've had a rare collectable for several years without knowing it? - 213.89.251.44 (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, it was 45pm and had different sound. See also: TrouserPress.com. (In fact I thought this had been cited in this article, perhaps in an earlier version.) -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CD Label misprint, common?

message: I was under the impression that Second Edition was remixed slightly, and has a different sound to Metal Box (the explanation being that Metal Box was a set of 12" records played at 45rpm, which allowed for deeper bass). This discussion dances around the issue but at least mentions it. In fact, was Metal Box a set of 45rpm (rather than 33rpm) discs? 2/metalbox.html Fodderstompf says yes, but Wikipedia says nothing. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, it was 45pm and had different sound. See also: TrouserPress.com. (In fact I thought this had been cited in this article, perhaps in an earlier version.) -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Edition / 45rpm

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Metal Box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111211182223/http://www.rollingstone.com:80/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-19691231/metal-box-public-image-ltd-19691231 to http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-19691231/metal-box-public-image-ltd-19691231
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060430185521/http://www.bluedrums.co.uk:80/ to http://www.bluedrums.co.uk
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Keith Levene interview cited http://www.furious.com/perfect/keithlevene2.html is littered with impossible claims and false memories. Poptones was not recorded at The Manor but at the Townhouse. The drums in the billiard room at the Manor were played by David Humphrey and were not used for Poptones.
The claim that Death Disco was recorded at a hall in Brixton says that they worked with Jim Walker 'but didn't record with him' - this is self contradictory. Death Disco was recorded at The Manor with Humphrey on drums not Walker or Dudanski. I'll find correct citatins and work on this.  I don't think this interview is a reliable source.  Any thoughts? Thelisteninghand (talk) 19:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some serious problems