Talk:The Apprentice (British TV series)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on The Apprentice (UK TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070425100214/http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/primetime/the_apprentice to http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/primetime/the_apprentice
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329001934/http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article1521066.ece to http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article1521066.ece
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724064304/http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/07/19/the-apprentice-fated-or-flawed/ to http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/07/19/the-apprentice-fated-or-flawed/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607160659/http://www.nationalstudentapprentice.com/ to http://www.nationalstudentapprentice.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Have this idea, that I want to share with other editors to see what their opinions will be for it - how about the inclusion of a History section for the programme, detailing its origins, and its eventual creation to what it became when it first was broadcast on British TV? Some of this section would include the moving of information about its origins from the Lead, and any other information that could flush it out could be found from some research, but overall, I think it would be nice to know this. What do others think? GUtt01 (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support it as long as it is sourced and not OR. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

text: Well, like I said above, some of the Lead does feature information about the show's origin. And those pieces of information do have citations to back them up. GUtt01 (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for new section - History 

message: A discussion has begun over the deletion of articles covering each series of this programme. The general basis for this discussion is that the articles covering these series have "Too much detail for general-interest, especially notes", as stated by the nominator for their deletions. If you wish to add in your views, do so now. GUtt01 (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: AFDs of this nature are frequently bundled. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by "fregunetly bundled"? GUtt01 (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

text: WP:BUNDLE. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion for Deletion, for articles covering each respective series of ''The Apprentice'' 

message: Hi, Just a heads up I've removed the hatnote as I don't really see the point in having one, If the article was titled "The Apprentice" only then sure but as it's under "UK TV series" it seems all but pointless.... –Davey2010Talk 22:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote 

message: Just a thought as reading this, but goddamn is it long. As of today it's 3x the size of the American version on which it is based on, and in line with reducing the amount of verbosity in the series pages, I think there's a considerable amount of detail that could be trimmed off this page too.
What do people think? I'm not particularly inclined either way, but figured before I get the shears out and invoke needless edit wars I'd ask opinions. eeveeman (talk) 19:52, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs a trim? 

message: For some time, The Apprentice (British TV series) has used an Infobox to break down information on each series in terms of candidates involved, plus Winner & Runner-up. Unfortunately, I'm concerned over whether this arrangement is appropriate. Should it stay?
* YES
* NO
Please list reason for your answer below. GUtt01 (talk) 20:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   Quite alright. I felt that they were excessive to a point where there was hardly any reason to have them, considering all candidates are listed within each respective Series' article, as well as a "List of Candidates" article. GUtt01 (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely agree GUtt01, Thanks for originally removing them and again apologies for reveting you, Hope you have a lovely Crimbo and a very Happy New Year:), Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:34, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment - Infobox in Series Overview Section 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 3" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 1 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 1" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]