Talk:Warmachine

message: Worth noting one inaccuracy on the gameplay- everyone except 'jacks has a Command stat. Not just troops. Might not hurt to update this with info about elite warcasters and point ranges, as well as the Steamroller rules.
-Wraithshadow
Fixed another inaccuracy.  Maintenance and Control phase order and descriptions were mixed up.
-Blightshadow 23:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay 

message: Like several other games of this genre, there are pics, but this one could use some. Colonel Marksman 17:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an image of a Juggernaut, does this help? If someone wants to replace it, feel free. Althai 04:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, there's no reason we should stick to having only one picture, so if you have such a picture (i.e. you took the picture or you know who did, so we don't run into any copyright issues), upload it and add it to the article! Althai 02:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

text: i'll try & get a picture done next i go to my gaming club then, i do have 2 painted starter sets, but my Cygnar aren't that good & are getting repainted & i've very little scenary at home Shas'o sodit 11:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures?

message: This article is the last one in :Category:Articles with unsourced categories. I think we should make an effort to solve this.
The thing is that this article is in the :Category:Steampunk games, because it is closely connected with the Iron Kingdoms RPG, which is called "something of a steampunk version of Dungeons & Dragons" (although this statement itself in Iron Kingdoms is also unsourced).
Could someone find a clear reference, calling Warmachine a steampunk game, or at least add some text that makes inclusion into this category more defendable. Debresser (talk) 21:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a reference and added it. Apart from the fact that the text clearly says that the game employs "steam-powered warjacks", which is enough of an indication as well. Debresser (talk) 16:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced category 

message: Hey all. I agree with the "B" rating on the quality of the article. Why don't we get together and improve the artcile so its quality does the game some justice?
I'd like to see the MK II rules under its own heading on the page, explaining the significance of the change. We should also probably agree on a single format for all the faction pages, and at least put up a smattering of info on the nonexistent skorne and Retribution pages. 
The release date sections should be updated and at least somewhat synchronized with the Privateer Press site.
Lastly, I think having a brief explanation of the gameplay would be helpful. Having a few good high-quality shots of battles in progress would be great, too.
Thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentley Foss (talk • contribs) 17:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing a Better Article? 

message: Looks like there hasn't been a serious attempt to improve this article in a few years, and most of the article is stub. I think one of the main issues is the lack of good secondary sources. Most of the sources will be primary in nature. Being a board game, there likely will be notability issues with many secondary sources. With that being said, I'm going to try and work on this article, any assistance is greatly appreciated :) Ries42 (talk) 18:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this Article