Talk:Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham

message: so, what exactly is it you want to retain? You're now doing multiple mass-reverts diff diff, because you want to retain one piece of text, , without specifying what exactly. That's WP:DISRUPTIVE. Yet, I presume you're referring to this piece from the lead:
As a starter:
* Note that the WP:LEAD summarizes the article, which is not the case here. It's obvious that this is a WP:UNDUE addition to the lead, put there to push a point of view. 
* Further, as the Shankara maths were probably established in the 14th century CE, any claim of being established by Shankara in the 8th century CE, let alone the 5th century BCE, is questionable.
The text is poorly written, and the sources are grabbed together to support a specific point of view, with little regard for WP:RS:
* "Its founding is attributed by its followers to Adi Shankara"
:*  - Dalal is WP:RS
* "though this is categorically dismissed by all the four cardinal Sankara mathas established by Adi Sankara as per his own work Mathamnaya Setu":
:*  - I don't know what the "Mathamnaya Setu" ism but be sure that it is not written by Shankara. Does this primary source state that the four mathas deny Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham's claim? It would be quite extraordinary for an (alledgedly) 5th c. BCE text to dispute a claim from the 19th century...
* "according to the Sringeri matha, Purī Govardhana Pīṭhaṃ and the Dwarka Sharada Peetham, who legally holds the Jyotir Math" - does this refer to the dismissal of Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham's claims, or to the claim that the other four mathas were established by Shankara?
:* 
::
::See above; a court statement is not WP:RS for such a claim
* "as well." - ah, the four mathas deny Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham's claims. But not in the "Mathamnaya Setu," nor in the court statement.
* "Adi Sankara in this work does not hold Kanchi among the original mathas established by him."
:*  - pagenumber? 
:*  - Tamil-language source; unverifiable.
:* 
:*  - idem
:*  - idem
:*  - dead link
:*  - "The Kumbakonam Mutt was established in 1821 by the Maratha king of Tanjore, Pratap Singh Tuljaji, as a branch of the Sringeri Mutt" - that seems relevant, but not the best source. Anyway, this is mentioned elsewhere in the article, and was retained by me, with additional sources. But it says nothing about the "Mathamnaya Setu."
:*  - pagenumber? Publisher? Relevance?
:*  - pagenumber? Interesting source, but not WP:RS. 
The point you want to make is already covered by this statement:
If you want to state that the other mathas reject Kanchi Kamakoti Peetham's claims, you'll have to come with WP:RS, not Tamil soyrces and propaganda booklets. And you definitely don't do mass-reverts to reatin poorly written, poorly sourced text. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:56, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: He's sited news articles and good tamil sources. What's the problem with Tamil sources? That it's written in Tamil. Shows clear bias against sources from non-European languages. RamgopalChandrasekaran (talk) 04:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Tamil-sources are unverifiable for non-Tamil readers. See WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:RS. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass-revert 

message: couls you add this page to your watchlist? Thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that the three above users have formed a syndicate with User:Joshua Jonathan to do propaganda for an illegal cause reading from all the talk articles. Any 'consensus' is a set up like what the UN is now, between a bunch of cronies or sockpuppets of the same user. Marappagounder (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ping 

message: A threat for prosection is different from a verdict. Wikipedia is neither a qualified body to adjudicate , nor are the editors. If some title is legally held by someone, wikipedia editors cannot award it another.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marappagounder (talk • contribs) 06:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding legal 'threats'