lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Songs for Swingin' Lovers!

message: The two pictures are annoying - the first doesn't say what it's supposed to be - presumably a pre-1957 album cover.  The second is a "Post-1957" cover but is clearly a CD reissue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.125.83 (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Comus (band)

message: If someone cares, Current93 made a cover version of "Diana" --217.85.89.55 10:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Version

message: Are the Keith Hale and Graham Caxon who're listed in personnel the same chaps who went on to play in Blood Donor in the late '70s; and Hawkwind, Toyah etc in Hale's case?  I'm inclined to think it's probably a coincidence because of how much earlier Comus were around, but it'd be interesting to find out.—Chris (blather • contribs • e)  20:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood Donor 

message: the LATE 2000's? the album magically appeared in 1971? animal-like vocals? like turtles and shit? get a grip!--209.6.193.6 (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? Rodhullandemu 00:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ????
Talk:Rukun Negara

message: The version in the article is not the full version of the Rukunegara. You know the bit that begins with "Bahawasanya..." (or something of the sort) at the back of the exercise books? That's part of it too. If I can track one down, I'll include the full version in the article, but for now, if anyone else could locate the full version... Johnleemk | Talk 10:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Full pledge

message: Why are there two English versions? Someone combine the two. My opinion is that the second one is more elegant.101.114.75.206 (talk) 10:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two English versions?
Talk:Simon Taufel

message: I'm not sure whether we need the match details of Taufel's only other match in Australia, against SA in 2001. Taufel's inaction against Lee's vicious bouncers might be relevant, but the significant individual scores are questionable.
Also, a reference to the ICC Elite umpire panel seems appropriate.--Alexio 11:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Elite Umpires panel/description of match
Talk:Sordid Lives

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAnthony (talk • contribs) 05:11, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: In an effort to expand this stub class article, I re-arranged existing verbiage and added a cast/characters section with brief character descriptions. The article still needs a plot description and references (I also see a dead link) which I will have to work on later. Cheers! ZouBEini 02:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Class Article 

message: hello,
"To keep the sordid stories coming, VIACOM's new premium station Logo has greenlight 12 episodes of Del Shores' Sordid Lives: The Series."
1.  "VIACOM's new premium station Logo"?   i've had channel (time warner cable - nyc) for several years and it's not premium (just part of one of the extended-tier group of channels).
2.  "has greenlight"?  perhaps "greenlit" or "greenlighted" or less jargoning..."ordered"
regards.
162.83.188.35 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "logo" - premium channel? et al.
Talk:And Then There Were None (1974 film)

message: I was told years back that Oliver Reed had filmed the Three Musketeers right before And Then There Were None.  During a sword fight, he was stabbed in the neck and was badly injured.  The turtleneck sweater he wore was to cover the surgical wounds/bandages from the injuries he sustained.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.120.0.25 (talk) 06:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Oliver Reed's Turtleneck Sweater

message: Someone recently changed this page from "Ten Little Indians" to "And Then There Were None." Usually Wikipedia uses a film's original title in its country of origin, I believe. If the title in the country of origin is not in English, then the common title from the US theatrical release is used. This film is a confusing case, because it was a joint Italian/German/French/Spanish-financed co-production, filmed in Iran and Spain, in English, with an international cast. The Italian title "...e poi, non ne rimase nessuno" does indeed translate literally to And Then There Were None. The German title "Ein Unbekannter rechnet ab" translates as A Stranger Calculates. The Spanish title "Diez Negritos" and the French title "10 petits negres" both use the offensive original title of the book. So only one of the countries of origin even used a version of the title cited here. I can't find any evidence that the film was released in any English-speaking countries under the title "And Then There Were None". UK posters online show the title "Ten Little Indians" and the film was released in the US by Avco Embassy under the title "Ten Little Indians". It would seem to make the most sense to move the page back to the title "Ten Little Indians", as that's the title used in English-speaking markets. Jamesluckard (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I did further research online and found sources showing And Then There Were None was, indeed, the UK and Australian title. Since the UK was a contributing country to the film's production, it does makes sense to have that as the primary English language title. I've added links to sources for the titles and distributors in the UK, Australia and US. Jamesluckard (talk) 18:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Sound Magazine

message: If all critics are in agreement about how good this LP is, then it should not be hard to find a reference proving that.
The Rolling Stone Record Guide from 1979 does not consider The Partridge Family to be worthy of mention.
Varlaam (talk) 02:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Consummate"
Talk:Soundtrack album

message: I haven't looked closely, but the two articles seem to be talking about almost exactly the same thing. --DocumentN (talk) 09:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Soundtrack]]? 

message: Please do not indent paragraphs on Wikipedia articles. It causes the typeface to change and the whole article to be thrown out-of-whack. AlbertSM (talk) 02:04, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Indenting paragraphs

message: This this section somewhat dubious, for a number of reasons.
* it is complied from a number of different sources that count their figures in different ways, so the numbers are hardly comparable.
* it includes numbers for individual tracks, not albums, which is the article's subject.  And again, it is comparing view/play counts for individual tracks, against streaming for entire albums.
* some of the totals appear to be combining individual track's figures to create a grand total.  Sometimes even from different sources. Making the total again something different.
* it doesn't include all steaming services, just those that the Wikipedia editor has thought to look at.
* there is no indication that all possible soundtracks have been included.  For instance, where is Frozen's 1.6 billion views on youtube alone?
Basically the numbers are meaningless, comparing them is meaningless, making the section meaningless.  I appreciate the editor's good intentions, but this is suspiciously like original research. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 18:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most-streamed soundtracks
Talk:Souvenirs (Tina Arena album)

message: The release date differs from the Tina Arena article. Which one is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.174.129.98 (talk) 18:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date
Talk:Spanish Train and Other Stories

message: What is the rationale for including a link to the 'problem of evil' in the 'see also' section? It doesn't appear relevant to any song of this record? Sejtam (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Special Occasion (Bobby Valentino album)

message: Is it really appropriate to have occasion redirect to this article? Even in the absence of a definition article I'm not sure this is valid. Should said article be created / a note be written in "Special Occasion" / a wiktionary link be added?
Jimmilu (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect: Occasion
Talk:SpectroMagic (soundtrack)

message: What is with these additions to the track listing? I got the listing that was there from the official booklet. --blm07 23:37, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 
Talk:Spellbound (Paula Abdul album)

message: I removed this unsourced paragraph written in a ranty and defensive tone.  Some of it may be salvagable if it is sourced. Gamaliel 23:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Music videos were produced for each of the singles, and all received heavy airplay on MTV. "Rush, Rush", featuring Keanu Reeves — at that time a superstar — paid homage to the classic film Rebel Without A Cause. 
"At that time" -- well, then.  Is this a bit snarky or am I not thinking largescale time enough?  12.162.122.6 (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Keanu

message: Someone has omitted Paula's co-writing credit on the song.  She DID co-write it.  I put it back in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilljayne (talk • contribs) 13:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Promise Of A New Day
Talk:Shanghai Fugu Agreement

message: I object to the deletion request placed on the page at 2008-10-24 13:31; if there are still few links it points rather to weaknesses of the English wikipedia concerning the articles on Joschka Fischer, Green Party etc which so far do not show the role of "Spontis" i.e. the anarchistic trend which was so important in the German Green movement for considerable time and for which this lemma is a fine example. Without explanation nobody would understand a mentioning of the fugu agreement; eyplanation would unduly blow up the concerned articled. --Kipala (talk) 01:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion request
Talk:Spirit of '76 (album)

message: In the circle that I moved in, this album was highly rated on release. Several of my friends had a copy. FWIW I was living in Liverpool at the time; perhaps it was not considered hip in California, but we thought it was amazing. MrDemeanour (talk) 11:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Largely Ignored" 

message: The current link for the All Music review is now dead. I would like to replace the link with the current review one, but don't know how to go about it properly. Here it is:
https://www.allmusic.com/album/spirit-of-76-mw0000336086
Let me know how this can be done properly. Thanks.Frschoonover (talk) 01:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Music Review Link
Talk:Split album

message: In my humble opinion, we don’t need several articles for split releases; one will do. The German Wikipedia has one single article and several redirects, so why shouldn’t we proceed the same way here? Why should we have several articles for split albums, split EPs and so on if one split release article would do? Rotten Bastard 14:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split articles 

message: I have a split single of the Dutch rock band Van Katoen with rap act Osdorp Posse which works in a different manner:
The first track has the song from Van Katoen in one stereo channel and the song from Osdorp Posse in the other. To listen to one separately you would have to turn off one audio channel or turn the balance to one channel fully on your set or music player on the computer.
Track two and three contain the songs from Van Katoen and Osdorp Posse separately.
I was wondering if this is rare or even unique way of doing a split single or if there are more of these? If the latter is the case it might be worth nothing something about it in the article.
» thomas  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.3.176.151 (talk) 08:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereo split single
Talk:Split Personality (song)

message: That's a completely ludicrous statement. You might as well say Vanilla Ice is responsible for Snoop Dogg. The author of the entry is clearly not up on 1980's hip-hop history. Try Schoolly D, KRS-One, or Ice-T if you want to find gangsta rap's roots. Also somebody get rid of that damn BetaCommandBot, it's polluting every discussion page on this site. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Split Personality" didn't launch gangsta rap
Talk:Split the Country, Split the Streets

message: Redirected page, this is a duplicate for the album 'Split the Country, Split the Street' (NO 'S') Tubeyes (talk) 03:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No 'S' in title
Talk:Stabbing the Drama

message: Is the album cover black or white? The official site shows theirs as white but that could be because their site background is black. Does anyone know what the official cover color is? Maybe we should ask the artist who created it... FireCrystal (talk) 22:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, in this case I think the lowest common denominator should be used. What I mean is that it's obvious that Soilwork released different covers for this album (my physical copy has a red background with black graphics, but I know that's the U.S. "special" edition). Anyways, on Soilwork's site it shows the cover with the white background and so does Nuclear Blast's website so I think it's a safe bet to go with that one. --Nova Weaver (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Thanks for the comment. :) FireCrystal (talk) 00:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover
Talk:Stack-o-Tracks

message: What might that be?  the only definition i know is "stingy person" which makes no sense. Subsolar 05:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "penny pincher"? 

message: I created a "Spotify Music Selections" page on facebook which included the Stack'o'Tracks track of Little Saint Nick.  I heard the instrumental of Jan and Dean's New Girl In School song and it was great, and I wish there could be a Beatles' Stack'o'Tracks for some of their songs, usually earlier ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.146 (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is an underrated album
Talk:The Empire Strikes Back (soundtrack)

message: It's written so bad. Like a total music noob who thinks he understand things is attempting to critisise the album because it's remasters. and "remasters are bad :(" he thinks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.33.234.236 (talk) 12:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, you could have deleted it yourself.  But anyway, the section about the 1997 release does seem like trolling.  Especially using the word "problems" for the section header.  Calling the issues "problems" is a subjective judgement.  And I know there are problems with the older releases just in terms of sound quality.  I'm going to delete the section, and if anyone wants to revive it, you'd better have citations this time. --EEPiccolo (talk) 02:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somebody delete the ridicillous crap about sound quality issues of 1997, 2004.  

message: The section named Problems with the Anthology and Special Edition Release says: The Anthology release restored all of the music featured on the double LP of Empire, with the exception of "This Is No Cave."
But other than this sentence, there is no mention anywhere about a piece called "This Is No Cave".
Pim 2 (talk) 10:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "the stereo field is very narrow and the left/right separation is minimal" Isn't this saying the same thing 2 different ways?   "The film version of "Luke's Nocturnal Visitor," which features an alternate ending, has never been released." - the film version has an alternate ending? This entire section is not good. Derekbd (talk) 12:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This is no cave"?
Talk:Starfish (album)

message: According to Steve's interview at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDNGq5R9An4 , the album was named because the drummer threw out the name Starfish. The description as to the basis of the album name in this article does not seem consistent with Steve's own words.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClintJCL (talk • contribs) 00:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  source of name 

message: The article states that "Milky Way" charted at #5 in Australia and the LP charted at #7. In The Church discography the song is listed at #22 (Aus) while the LP is #11 (Aus). This page is sourced but I don't have access to the book in question. 162.253.138.50 (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed that up now (and I have the book in question).  The release date previously listed here was also wrong.Nqr9 (talk) 10:38, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart positions 
Talk:Staring at the Cellophane

message: :Image:0744aa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:0744aa.jpg
Talk:Starting Over (Raspberries album)

message: Strictly speaking, "Starting Over" was not the Raspberries' final album.  Three members of the band got back together 25 years later, as the Raspberries, and put out a fifth album, entitled "Refreshed."  Eric Carmen was not one of those three members, however, and the album was not a hit. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It was just an extended play, whose six songs totaled just 17 minutes in all. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strictly Speaking...
Talk:Plus-Tech Squeeze Box

message: where the hell can i find the pucca theme tune? i have looked everywhere i can think of! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.191.25 (talk) 04:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pucca theme tune

message: The article seems to be heavily POV at the top, giving claims of the band's greatness without any third-party references. It isn't a huge problem, but it just gives the article a slanted feel. 66.65.197.38 21:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a really obvious copyvio (from a press release I'd imagine), is what it is. I'll try to remember to fix it later. Alexforcefive 03:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Alexforcefive 17:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And redone. The first paragraph was, in effect, a press release -- it was written by User:Vroomsound, ostensibly a representative of the band's label of the same name. I rewrote the rewrite to restore a great deal of information which was present in the revision immediately prior to the aforementioned modification by User:Vroomsound, and did a bit of copyediting as well (Alexforcefive, try to remember the periods next time :D) tgies 09:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issue
Talk:Stay with The Hollies

message: Formal request has been received to merge the article Here I Go Again (album) into Stay with The Hollies; dated: October 2018. Proposer's Rationale: Since Here I Go Again is the just US release title of Stay with the Hollies, having two separate articles seems to be duplicating content. Pinging proposer  Discuss here. Richard3120 (talk) 20:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Steelbath Suicide

message: "This is possibly the best example of the band at their tightest and most intense, a firm example of the band's immediate roots in Swedish death metal, with some serious industrial sounds thrown into the mix"
Weasel words, peacocking and a general sense of not being very neutral about the achievement. I think this should be reworded or sources should be provided.
83.84.136.178 (talk) 17:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues with neutrality on this page
Talk:Steppin' Out with the Grateful Dead: England '72

message: Hello!  A couple of years ago, you added the recording dates and venues for the songs, with this edit.  What's your source for this information?  I'm looking at the CD liner notes, and they list the venues, but not the dates.  So for example, how do you know "China Cat Sunflower" and "I Know You Rider" were from May 23rd, and not the 24th, 25th, or 26th?  — Mudwater (Talk) 08:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello! I was getting ready to object to the recent removal of the recording dates from the track listing, here, when this discussion section reminded me that we don't have a reliable source for the dates.  To say the same thing in a different way: Usually a numbered list is the preferred way to format a tack listing, but the use of a track listing template is justified in more complicated situations -- one of which, potentially, would be including the recording dates for the songs.  But in this case, it's best to remove the recording dates entirely -- see my recent edit here -- unless we can find a reliable reference for them.  They're not listed in the album liner notes, as I noted above. — Mudwater (Talk) 11:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

text: I cross-referenced the Steppin' Out with the Grateful Dead: England '72 notes from Europe '72: The Complete Recordings.  For example, "China Cat Sunflower"/"I Know You Rider" in your comment is cited as from Steppin' Out here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe_%2772:_The_Complete_Recordings#Europe_'72,_Vol._19:_Lyceum_Theatre,_London,_England_(5/23/1972) Mdeloia (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

text: That's a good question.  Yeah, I'm not sure.  I wonder if they did get those dates from Grateful Dead Productions, or what.  Probably they did, in which case they would be reliable, in my view.  — Mudwater (Talk) 21:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording dates
Talk:Stevie Wonder Live

message: I can’t find details of who played and worked on this album: producer, musicians, etc. As well as dates and location(s) of the recording(s).
The M.C. is credited on the album sleeve as Detroit DJ Scott Regen. Regen says in the introduction “Are you ready for him? Are Detroit ready, Stevie Wonder?” which suggests the intro, at least, was recorded in Detroit. 
The Netherlands pressing, retitled “Live in Person” has album sleeve credits for Gene Kee as Musical Director. Design (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel?
Talk:Still Cruisin'

message: Why are "Problem Child" and "Happy Endings" listed as singles from this album when they aren't apparently included on the album? Propaniac (talk) 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles 

message: "One controversial point was that the version of "Wouldn't It Be Nice" had a section with Love singing lead where as on the original Brian Wilson had sung this. You can compare the versions by jumping to 1:07 in the recording." - Not true! The one with Love *is* the original version from Pet Sounds. It was only later when they remastered it in stereo that they had to replace it with an earlier version because they'd lost the original recordings: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pet_Sounds_Sessions It's right there in the liner notes in the Pet Sounds Sessions box set and the 2001 reissue of Pet Sounds on CD. --94.195.193.132 (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wouldn't it be nice 
Talk:Still Hungry (Twisted Sister album)

message: Sorry, there are no 2004 "brand new studio tracks". Tracks 12-15 are re-recordings of late 70s/early 80s tracks, released in "live"- or demo-versions on Club Daze Vol 1 & 2.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.153.172 (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled