Talk:War of the Sixth Coalition

message: It says in the top box that Bavaria changed sides after the Battle of Leipzig. However, Bavaria switched sides a few days before with the treaty of Ried on 8th Oct and declared war on France on the 14th Oct, two days before the Battle of Leipzig. Changed it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.224.118.123 (talk) 23:40, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bavaria

message: Should the invasion of Russia really be considered part of this war?  The coalition was established, I thought, by Prussia's defection from France in January 1813. john k 13:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Russia

message: Just a small note: I'm not sure how to do this, but a small part of the War in Germany section with the phrase "east from 30,000 ..." is unreadable, and I have no idea how to fix it. anyone know how to do this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.164.17.216 (talk) 22:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: War in Germany

message: Why should the map include all of the colonies?
Looking at it alone one would think that Australians and Peruvians hopped aboard a boat and went off to fight France!
A map showing just the primary countries involved would serve the article far better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.251.34 (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  The colonies were tangential to this conflict. 108.254.160.23 (talk) 16:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  The map is still wrong though. The two Mecklenburgs (Schwerin and Strelitz) left the Rhine confederation already in March 1813 and joined the coalition.--Ickerbocker (talk) 17:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Map 

message: I think the infobox stating that the United States was a "co-belligerent" of France is extremely misleading. The American war with 1812 was only indirectly related to the Napoleonic wars, and the Wikipedia article on co-belligerence states that the term means " waging [a] war in cooperation against a common enemy without the formal treaty of military alliance." [sic] If the US is included then the infobox would logically have to include anyone at war with any of the Napoleonic belligerents anywhere between 1812 and 1814. Better to remove it.209.235.2.8 (talk) 16:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe if you study the issue, you will find that the United States did cooperate with France between 1812 and 1814 to the extent that the two nations could assist one another against their common enemy, Britain. The United States also cooperated with Britain against Revolutionary France during the period of the Quasi-War, so the U.S. could actually be regarded as having been a co-belligerent on both sides during different periods of the Napoleonic era. The U.S. was never an actual participant in these alliances, but was certainly willing to cooperate with whichever side furthered its own national interest at the time. Jsc1973 (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA 

message: @user:SJCreecy I have been cleaning up the short citations on this page. However I come across a problem, which it will be easier and quicker for you to solve than for me. You made this edit Revision as of 07:35, 10 May 2020 during a series of edits to the page. You included a citation to support the text "Chandler, Pp. 908-913." Unfortunately there were (and are) two long citations in the references section that could support this short citation:
* 
* 
Please could you add the year of publication to this and the other short citations to Chandler that you include and do not contain a year?
-- PBS (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem! Done.! SJCreecy (talk) 23:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short citations to Chandler that do not include a year