lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Malvern, Victoria

message: What is the source for the /mælvərn/ pronunciation? In watching online videos of Melbourne locals, they say /'mɔːlvərn/.67.83.99.134 (talk) 21:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:Leah Dizon

message: So recently I've stumbled upon some pics of her wearing pretty kimonos, and upon further investigation, she appears to have designed her own kimono line. see ishou.jp Should we include the fact that she is a designer in this article as well? also she designed wedding dresses too according to Japan Today and that article dates back to 2007 DivineBaboon (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: She is a kimono designer?

message: She was in some stage plays (one which had EXILE as well), and I was wondering if these should be listed.
99.149.218.33 (talk) 10:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They should be listed only if they made it to television or the big screen. For example, if she only performed them socially or in a local theater, I don't think it is relevant. Mind providing some references so I can see the list? ★Dasani★ 23:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: From my understanding, she has only acted in two or three plays (if there is a third, I can't seem to find it/a source for it). She did do some work before the shotgun wedding. Anyway, I've since went ahead and added it. ★Dasani★ 05:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stage plays 
Talk:Plow & Hearth

message: Hi. A stub was published yesterday, but was deleted as spam. I took the time to compile enough information to show that this is a notable company in the United States. It is one of the largest catalog retailers of furniture and "country living" products, and a well-known brand, particularly in the Mid-Atlantic states of the United States, and certainly more notable than many of the other retailers with articles or stubs on Wikipedia. I am hoping the Admin who deleted the stub yesterday might reconsider. Thanks. Hcl777 05:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Company, Encyclopedic Content 

message: This article needs extensive editing to look like an encyclopedia article based on reliable secondary sources rather than like company spam written by company shills. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 18:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising Copy Doesn't Belong on Wikipedia.
Talk:Melton, Victoria (suburb)

message: cant this page be merged with the Melton, Victoria page, its kind of stupid to have 2 of the same page.--Metal to the Max! 02:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not the same - one relates to the suburb, and the other relates to the urban centre which includes Kurunjang and the various Melton directionals. Orderinchaos 11:10, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???? 
Talk:Witchy Woman

message: ADD:
"Witchy Woman" was covered by the Hollies in 1972 as an outtake for their album "Romany"
source: https://www.allmusic.com/album/romany-mw0000714439 Tony From Long Island (talk) 00:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 20:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2020
Talk:The Key and the Clock

message: This article is terrible, whoever did it should have added more. If anyone still has the episodes of photographic memory please add onto this, and possibly the other two. Unless it is better to just not do the episodes at all, but for now please expand. -BioYu-Gi! 12/29 12:30 pm
: Rather than carp, perhaps you could expand and improve the article (which it certainly needs)? 80.238.8.128 12:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Princes Hill

message: The police thing, whilst historically interesting, needs to be put into some kind of context, because as of right now, it's just about a thing that happened in the 19th century, with no other explanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.66.89 (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Police 
Talk:Turanian Society

message: == The reference ==
I removed the reference to Prussia as among those countries (Finland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, and Turkey) which supposedly founded the Turanian Army in 2005.  I know nothing of the Turanian Army, but I do know Prussia hasn't been a nation-state since the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871, thus it seems unlikely Prussia was involved in any event having transpired in 2005.KevinOKeeffe 05:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I removed the reference to Prussia as among those countries (Finland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, and Turkey) which supposedly founded the Turanian Army in 2005.  I know nothing of the Turanian Army, but I do know Prussia hasn't been a nation-state since the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871, thus it seems unlikely Prussia was involved in any event having transpired in 2005.KevinOKeeffe 05:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reference
Talk:Maiara Walsh

message: Look, Maiarakok is not Bahavian, she's Brazilian (Rio de Janeiro). She is the first Brazilian girl that came to America and now works in Disney Chanel.
What do meant by "She is the first Brazilian girl that came to America"?. I did not understand this. --SkyWalker 12:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  By Bel 

message: It says in the Notes under her Filmography that she starred in her video. Any proof? I watched the video...she's not there. And it doesn't say that she starred in the video on her website either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.28.127.203 (talk) 08:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Miley Cyrus 7 Things

message: (In the episodes she lip sings but in real live she recorded the song in studio duh!!!!)Maiarawalshfan 03:05, 08 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lip syncher 

message: There is nothing about her singing in the article. If she's notable enough to be mentioned and categorized as a singer, then it should be notable enough to tell where or what she has sung. 82.141.73.182 (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  singer? 
Talk:Anti-aging product

message: A Consumer Reports study has shown anti-wrinkle creams don't offer much improvement to the skin.  After 12 weeks, the best products were only able to reduce the average depth of wrinkles by 10% - a barely visible change to the naked eye.  Source - The Australian Newspaper
I have no idea what Boslowox is and havent been able to find any reference to it apart from in articles that seem to have copied this wikipedia entry. If anyone has a good reference, they can put it back in. Halon8 (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Efficacy

message: I have developed, tested and published an open source anti-aging cream. (this link doesn't work, and the company doesn't seem to have anything to do with creams) http://ronja.twibright.com:8080/retune/ I would like to discuss if it's appropriate to put a link to this creme into the Anti-aging creme article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clocktwibright (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not. What you propose would be considered original research, which is not allowed at Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Open Source Anti-Aging Cream

message: I propose to merge Anti-aging supplements into Anti-aging cream. I think that the content in the shorter and less referenced Anti-aging supplements article can easily be explained in the context of Anti-aging cream. My reasoning is that Anti-aging supplements is mistitled, as supplements are orally consumed products, whereas the article deals only with topically applied products, i.e., creams. Four of the seven refs in the supplements article are already in the cream article. Lastly, there are in theory anti-aging supplements which are proposed to slow or reverse all aspects of aging (for example, antioxidants), not just skin, but that is not the content of the supplements article.
Per Wikipedia:Merging, unless contested, this merger will proceed in one week's time. David notMD (talk) 22:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Listed at: WT:WikiProject Fashion, WT:WikiProject Health and fitness, WT:WikiProject Pharmacology. Mathglot (talk) 00:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, this fell off my 'to-do' list. David notMD (talk) 03:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a great idea! I fully support the merger as well LashyLady (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jazaam02 (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing
Category talk:Mixed drinks

message: I don't really know how to change/format this, but if you click bartending, the first option is mixed drinks.  If you then click mixed drinks, the first option is bartending.  This goes on infinitely (I went to about ten levels before it got dull).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.20.20.128 (talk) 07:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bar tending/mixed drinks
Talk:Only the Brave (2006 film)

message: I just watched the movie and believe that there is fallacy in the plot as listed: the character Mary who is Jimmy's wife is not the former girlfriend of Freddy. They look similar but I believe they are different characters. 2600:1700:FE70:5630:7D8D:5917:A45B:A7BA (talk) 13:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in plot description
Talk:Conflict of laws in the United States

message: This article is a disaster. Even if I knew not the first thing about conflicts, I'd be wondering, "what's this 'traditional approach.'" Someone should clean it up.  76.172.55.115 06:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A DISASTER! 

message: The holding reflected in the article is incorrect.  The Petitioner's argument that was completely rejected by the court was that the substantive laws of each state in which any plaintiff resides should be consulted.  The Supreme Court stated "[w]e therefore hold that the protection afforded the plaintiff class members by the Kansas statute [the requires members of a plaintiff class to be notified of the suit and informing them they have the right to 'opt out']  satisfies the Due Process Clause."  There were 33,000 plaintiffs in the suit, and even though there were some that could not be contacted, the Due Process Clause was still satisfied because "a class action plaintiff is not required to fend for himself." Phillips Petroleum Company v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 (1985). Bakeman33 (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Summary of Rule for Phillips Petroleum Company v. Shutts 

message: What consitutes references for an article like this?  Does saying a certain redlinked court case had a decision constitute a reference?  RJFJR (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The concept of conflict of laws is distinct from the Full Faith and Credit issue, which is merely one aspect of conflict of laws. Full Faith and Credit is about how the Constitution requires states to recognize each others' judgments. Conflict of laws is also about what law to apply to reach the judgment in the first place. bd2412 T 13:28, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different from "Full Faith and Credit" 

message: For a long time, this article has incorrectly referred to Brainerd Currie's theory as "balance of interests analysis." Actually, the literature generally refers to his theory as "governmental interests analysis." Any objections before I fix this mess? --Coolcaesar (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The more common title for Currie's theory is "governmental interests analysis" 

message: As I am unable to find suitable references for large amounts of the content, I would propose to remove from the article all 
content which remains unsourced after a reasonable opportunity is given the community to provide adequate source materials / references. 71.91.178.54 (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove unsourced / unreferenced content
Talk:If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits

message: Fair use added. SkierRMH 06:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cher-If I Could Turn Back Time (Cher-s Greatest Hits)-Frontal.jpg
Talk:National Service Framework

message: Much of this page consisted of a long list of links to specific NSFs defined by the NHS.  It was hard to organize, but beyond that, I think it was actually counterproductive -- in the event that any of those NSFs were changed, or removed, or updated, the Wikipedia list would fall out of date.  I think it makes more sense to link to the NHS website and let people find out the current info for themselves. Tim Pierce 06:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning Up

message: I was just reading through this brief article as part of some routine research and would just like to note that as of July 2015 it is highly likely that the NSF is obsolete or redundant (the links/references are both dead). This is likely the result of NICE (National Institute for/of Clinical Excellence) and their guidelines being used as the means to provide "official" or sanctioned NHS advice for professionals working within the UK, thus replacing any need for a national framework of service/care provision for specific diseases (as that is exactly what NICE guidelines do). --109.246.124.38 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolescence?
Talk:Datu Patinggi Abang Haji Abdillah College

message: This guy here is just so stupid. He's commenting on the website and how proud he is that his school has at last 'made' it to Wikipedia. Pls delete the caption that says this site needs clean up. To the guy writing comment on this site; do it somewhere else. Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.58.86.15 (talk) 04:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for clean up 

message: With all due respect, I created the entry of Kolej DPAH Abdillah to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is NOT FRIENDSTER or MYSPACE -and in fact is a worldwide encyclopaedia. All the entries would then be edited by other Wikipedians. In fact, the reason I'm writing in English is because this webpage would then be reviewed by senior Wikipedians for its neutrality. The reason why I'm not allowing anyone to post comments like "how proud I am we are in Wikipedia" is because Wikipedia's talk page is only for FACTS DISPUTE! By writing comments like oh-I'm-so-proud in Bahasa Sarawak would made other Wikipedians, (mostly from English speaking countries) thought that there are some factual errors in Kolej Abdillah's entry. Therefore, if you want to express yourslef- do them in Friendster. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syed niz89 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Talk page is not a general forum to talk about the topic subject. Discussion is limited to improve the page per WP:NOTFORUM Chongkian (talk) 01:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop the comments already! 

message: This article is in definite need of clean up. The current state of the article is very, very messy. Wikipedia is not an indiscrimate source of information. Under the Extra-curricular achievements heading, for example, what justifies the addition of rugby, YEP and taekwando clubs but not the other clubs? And the famous alumni, are they really that famous? Think in the international context, not local.
As for the pictures, please specify the sources! I don't believe that Hussein Onn's picture is created by you, since you was not even born yet at that time. Your actions could potentially land Wikipedia in hot water, legally. Put the fair use tag instead. Syed, don't turn this article into a catastrophe. I'll be making further edits to the article for it to be in line with Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not revert such edits.– Matthew A. Lockhart (talk) 15:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up
Talk:53rd Troop Command

message: Holy Crap. Words fail express how much this page need a cleanup... I guess its a way to avoid painting the roof... Will remove tag when I finish V. Joe 06:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: Tracing a unit's history and heritage is VERY interesting and important, BUT it is also difficult and the version currently used shows no explanation whatsoever. Remember that wikipedia is not just for the experts in the minutiae of the United States Army (or the U.S. services in general), but for everybody... so try and make articles that are easy for the layperson to follow.  V. Joe 06:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heritage

message: I've moved it here, to keep a clean flow to the article... and because I substantially rewrote the original cut/paste so that it flows more smoothly and for an eye towards the non-specialist... Still need a LOT of work, but I digress
. Cheers V. Joe 07:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Copyright tag

message: As a Limey, albeit an ex-military one, I thought I would give this article the once-over. (Fresh eyes; look at it from a different perspective, etc, etc.). 
Its already been brought-up above, how confusing this mish-mash of an article is. Along with the gripes already noted, here's my tuppence-worth, (or should that be two cents?) 
For instance:
In the 'Demobilization and inter-war years' section - "...106th Regiment and part takes from the 10th infantry."
Huh? What does it mean?
The article is littered with un-explained acronyms - e.g. :
RAOC = ? (It used to mean Royal Army Ordnance Corps in the British Army, but I don't think that is what was meant).
HHD = ? 
EOD = ? (I know this one, I believe it means the same on both sides of the 'pond'), i.e. Explosive Ordnance Disposal.
HTC = ? 
CAC = ?
The article also mentions a presence at the "Ypres offensive" and the "Somme offensive".
As far as I know, there were no American units at 'Wipers' or the Somme; (Ypres was too far north and the Battle of the Somme was a year before America's entry into the war).
I'm sure there are more nonsenses, but I'll stop now, I'm starting to get a headache.
RASAM (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head hurts
Talk:Battle of Bauds

message: The illustration is certainly not of the historical king. It looks to be a 17th or 18th Century engraving. The armor and clothing style is definitely post-medieval. The caption should reflect the ahistorical depiction of this Danish leader. --Petercorless 21:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration is anachronistic
Talk:Richard Johnson (chaplain)

message: Date for church burning down must be incorrect. It states 1788 yet it previously states church was built in 1793? Does anyone have the correct date or could the date simply be removed?
Perhaps link this wiki to "Golden grove" wiki - being first fleet ship that Richard Johnson sailed in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozhamada (talk • contribs) 12:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ISO/IEC 17025

message: I suggest making any changes to ISO 17025 rathern than this article. Sagsaw 06:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: How many of these organisations are notable? Are they all commercial? If the article includes ANY non-notable commercial organisations then of course everyone will want to add their own. Wikipedia is not a directory. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam magnet? 

message: Shouldn't the official titel of the standard be presented to the reader? Thank you. Tom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.1.78.115 (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titel of standard? 

message: The article formatting was a disaster. I correctly formatted a bunch of material in the article. While doing it, I noticed that it still needs a lot of love. There are a lot of statements that need citations but don't have them. Thus, I also added a refimprove template. Like so many articles I see, I'd love to dig in more, but I only have so much free time. Hopefully others can chip in.
Lostraven (talk) 22:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup of article
Talk:Paris Road Bridge

message: We need info on when the bridge was built and opened. I'd guess from when the MRGO was built? What preceededed it? I recall some older folks recalling when Paris Road was partially carried by a pontoon bridge through cypress swamp.  I assume must have had some sort of drawbridge or opening for Intracoastal traffic.  -- Infrogmation 20:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:250 (number)

message: There must be a mistake in these sentences from the article:
Ban diao zi literally means half a diao (500 coins), which is a slang term referring to a person who is inadequate in skills or mental abilities. Since modest Chinese scholars may call themselves ban diao zi to humbly deprecate their own expertise, ban diao zi is not necessarily a pejorative term. On the other hand, Er bai wu (250) is half of a ban diao zi and it is an insult.
It says that "Ban diao zi" means half of 500 coins -- i.e. 250. Then it says that Er bai wu means 250 *and* means half of a ban diao zi -- both things can't be true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.157.251.229 (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 251 49.148.152.50 (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Back to gcash 250 49.148.152.50 (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistakes

message: this is all unsourced, and basically trivia:
*As a Mandarin slang term, 250 (二百五 pinyin èrbǎiwǔ) is an insult meaning "stupid person" or "simpleton". The expression is based on bàndiàozi (半弔子 or 半吊子). In ancient China, copper coins were grouped by stringing them together through the square holes in the center; originally 1000 was a unit of currency called a diao. Ban diao zi literally means half a diao (500 coins). Since modest Chinese scholars may call themselves ban diao zi to humbly deprecate their own expertise, ban diao zi is not necessarily a pejorative term. On the other hand, Er bai wu (250) is half of a ban diao zi and it is an insult.
2600:1700:5FA1:61B0:3C84:F153:E1A7:EF8 (talk) 03:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ik but why is there a Wikipedia article on the number 250 2600:100E:B036:18AD:8DF6:C318:6042:94F8 (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: moved from article

message: @Umer 1908 144.48.135.99 (talk) 20:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  299 

message: Fatima 102.164.96.22 (talk) 22:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fatima 1021649622(talk)22:59,19 March 2024 (UTC) 102.164.96.22 (talk) 23:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auta M Muhd 💟 

message: Fatima 102.164.96.22 (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auta M Muhd
Talk:Marina Tsvigun

message: Why is her name given in Russian?  She was born in Ukraine.  Either give it in Ukrainian or explain why not.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 22:04, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  name in Russian?
Talk:Annapolis Convention (1774–1776)

message: I have the Minutes for the convention's first session of meetings in 1775.  There is a July 26th document upon which some attention is focused, and it looks to me like a declaration of independence and war.  Is the Declaration of the Association of the Freemen of Maryland considered significant enough to Maryland's history to include here?  It begins "The long premeditated, and now avowed design of the British Government, to raise a revenue…"  (SEWilco 07:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the document in the appropriate time frame.  I don't have analysis of it; the Minutes don't discuss its creation.  (SEWilco 07:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Declaration of war