lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of the Jews in Poland

message: Not disputing the claim but I think in the introduction section it should be clarified that tolerance means specifically towards the Jewish community Cpawk (talk) 09:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland as “the most tolerant country in Europe” 

message: The Yiddish translation of “Polish Jews” (פּױלישע ייִדן) should be added under the Hebrew translation. 2603:7080:1B05:9F27:4CD0:776C:A4E6:3E4B (talk) 03:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Yiddish translation in box 

message: In the section "Territories annexed by the USSR (1939–1941)", there are multiple references to unreliable sources, like these:
1. A Geni.com page is cited for the following plus other information:
All private property and – crucial to Jewish economic life – private businesses were nationalized; political activity was delegalized and thousands of people were jailed, many of whom were later executed. Zionism, which was designated by the Soviets as counter-revolutionary was also forbidden. In just one day all Polish and Jewish media were shut down and replaced by the new Soviet press,Dr Pawel Goldstein, Lutsk (Luck) Ghetto. Geni.com. 
All private property and – crucial to Jewish economic life – private businesses were nationalized; political activity was delegalized and thousands of people were jailed, many of whom were later executed. Zionism, which was designated by the Soviets as counter-revolutionary was also forbidden. In just one day all Polish and Jewish media were shut down and replaced by the new Soviet press,Dr Pawel Goldstein, Lutsk (Luck) Ghetto. Geni.com. which conducted political propaganda attacking religion including the Jewish faith.
First of all, none of the above information appears in the cited Geni.com page. Second, Geni.com is a user created genealogy site, so in no way is this a Reliable Source. It is not even clear who the author of that page is. There is a reference to a Pawel Goldstein, who is cited under Profile. When one clicks on that it says; "Dr Pawel Goldstein, the distinguished neurosurgeon, was born in Tsarist Russia in 1884. He died from typhus in Luck, Ukraine during the Holocaust, 24 January 1942.Dr Goldstein was a graduate of the Fre...". Obviously, he is not the author of the Geni.com page, since he died in a Nazi ghetto in 1942, and no other author is listed. Anonymous sources do not belong in Wikipedia, and should be immediately deleted, particularly since the cited information does not even appear in this anonymous source.
2. Also in same section, there is this citation  to something called Expactica, identified as "The complete guide to expat life" with the slogan "Live. Love, Work." This too does not belong in Wikipedia, and needs to be deleted
3. No pages are provided for any of the 3 sources cited here:
Jewish refugees under the Soviet occupation had little knowledge about what was going on under the Germans since the Soviet media did not report on the goings-on in territories occupied by their Nazi ally.  
Thhhommmasss (talk) 19:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources, need to be removed
Talk:2002 United States steel tariff

message: If kept (nice work, Meelar) this should assuredly be renamed to something like 2003 US Steel Tariff, and a link made from WTO. -- Finlay McWalter 01:02, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: „Bush's experience shows us that the tariff ultimately has mixed results. Manufacturers that depend on cheap steel for their supply chains get hurt. When all was said and done, the Institute for International Economics (IIE) estimated that as many as 26,000 jobs were lost in steel-using industries (like the auto industry, for example).“ (http://www.businessinsider.de/bush-steel-tariff-impact-2017-7?r=US&IR=T ) --Schwobator (talk) 14:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  more impact
Talk:Kielce pogrom

message: * 
* Translation of Joanna Tokarska-Bakir's acclaimed monograph on the pogrom is to be published by Cornell University Press in November but till then, we can depend on this excellent interview and, of course, the Polish original.
* I had read a decent article by Blatman on the subject but cannot retrieve it now.
::Ah, ok, so Znak is a reliable source. Volunteer Marek  22:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent scholarship

message: I have just added a paragraph on the Communist party's reaction based on Gross's book "Fear". No doubt the language is defective - please, improve (or remove if you don't like it - sob sob) . Anyway, I was wondering if somebody could please verify the source quoted to support the section "Attempts to blame Polish anti-communist underground", that is,  What Gross says is not incompatible with Kamiński-Żaryn 2006, but I'd like to understand how the two books connect. Do the "reactionary elements" of society identify with the Polish independence underground in Party's parlance? I guess so. And do Kamiński-Żaryn provide an account of the subsequent reactions within the Party, as repored by Gross? Gitz (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction of the Communist party 

message: "Relations between non-Jewish Poles and Jews were already strained..." should be changed to:
"Relations between Jewish and non-Jewish Poles were already strained" Mlcred (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cherrell410 (talk) 23:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 July 2023 

message: Wouldn't it be advisable to write "Stalinist Polish soldiers ..." cf. "Nazi German." ? Galehautt (talk) 12:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "By Polish soldiers ..." 

message: There are two references to "Gross," but neither identifies him.
Shouldn't the first reference be something like, "According to author Jan Tomasz Gross… " Steveklein (talk) 12:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "According to Gross…"
Talk:Military recruit training

message: A Winner of the March 2005 West Dakota Prize
This entry is one of only seventeen that have won the March 2005 West Dakota Prize for successfully employing the expression "legend states" in a complete sentence. --Wetman 07:59, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: How is like in the army 2601:681:300:5C0:79D0:CB5A:30D1:C4C0 (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Just watch Stripes. It's pretty much a documentary.Niteshift36 (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army 

message: To 'Military recruit training' - because civilian employers recruit too and this is clearly a page about military recruits. Thoughts? If no objections I'll make the change in about a week and see what comes of it. Fugitivedave (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name change proposed 

message: Radio aktif kimia 114.122.20.115 (talk) 12:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turbin nuklir
Talk:Democratic Labor Party (Australia, 1955)

message: What's this "was"? It still has a membership and formal structure, despite not being as active as it was and not having any remaining parliamentary representation.
Technically, the current DLP is not directly linked with the previous DLP as the party was wound up in 1978.  http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/09/23/1095651466663.html
The current party is a new party with the same name and some of the old participants. --Peacenik 11:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus already reached. (non-admin closure) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Democratic Labor Party (historical) →  – Not the only defunct politicial party with this name. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Support Buidhe (talk) 04:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Support Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 17:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 April 2024
Talk:The Carolinas

message: Is there any reason why the Carolinas should be referred to collectively, aside from their names and close proximity? There is no special name for other pairs of states: Kentucky and Tennesee, New York and New Jersey, etc. 
If there is some relationship, be it formal, historical, cultural, whatever, that causes these two states to be taken as a pair, this article should describe it (or them). 
It does seem that they are (with some frequency) taken as a pair. If their names is the only reason, I suppose that should be in the article. 
As it stands, this seems to act like a disambiguation page. Well, something like one, at least.
::-Anthropos 05:14, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Passalidae

message: Anyone help??   I'm trying to arrange four elements here, and the more I try the more confused they get. I'm not too good at all these formulas.... Thanks for any help...I'll leave it alone for awhile to avoid conflicts. Pollinator 05:40, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Snoyes!  Pollinator 06:10, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Thanks also for avoiding edit conflicts. The tables in wikipedia are very user-unfriendly and I'm sure that eventually they will be replaced by something that is easier to use by non-computer nerds. If you are interested, I have a two generic pieces of code that I use quite often for displaying images on User:Snoyes/boiler. One for just displaying an image on the right with a caption and link to a larger version (under the heading "images"), and one for displaying multiple images in short articles (heading "Multi-image"). --snoyes 06:15, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)

text: American Beetles also uses "subsocial", so I'm keeping it. It seems that our favorite reference work (us :-) ) is missing a useful description of the concept though... Stan 03:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Somebody please merge Patent-leather beetle here.
:No, please don't. Passalidae is a family, the patent-leather beetle merely one species in that family. --Stemonitis 10:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent-leather beetle
Talk:John Coulthart

message: Not actually a publicity stunt
JC is an artist and all the links are valid.
"His main home page, Atelier Coulthart, is also sub-administrated by someone known only as "SM"."
John Coulthart here. The words above are complete nonsense. I administer, own (ie: pay for) and program my website in its entirety. There are no sub-administrators and I can't see how this statement has come about. If someone would like to discuss this further they're welcome to email me. My address is on my website contact page. Thank you.
Removed reference to 'SM' as this would first not be part of Mr. Coulthart's "Other Work" and second the same IP address also declared that 10% of Alaskans were Buddhist. Taken the obvious incorrectness of the Alaskan entry and Mr. Coulthart's refutation of the addition to this entry, I have removed it. Aristan 23:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beldum

message: This article is clearly does not have a neutral point of view.  If you want to know why, it repeatedly uses words and phrases such as "cute", "too bad", and "Beldum is quite cute" (the last one is also repetative), and it has an exclamation mark where it doesn't seem appropriate.  I'll mark the regions of offending text, and edit some of it myself. - Bulbaboy 06:16, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem solved. - Bulbaboy 06:29, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV problem
Talk:McArthur–Burney Falls Memorial State Park

message: From the State of California's website
:OWNERSHIP
:In general, information presented on this web site, unless otherwise indicated, is considered in the public domain. It may be distributed or copied as permitted by law. However, the State does make use of copyrighted data (e.g., photographs) which may require additional permissions prior to your use. In order to use any information on this web site not owned or created by the State, you must seek permission directly from the owning (or holding) sources. The State shall have the unlimited right to use for any purpose, free of any charge, all information submitted via this site except those submissions made under separate legal contract. The State shall be free to use, for any purpose, any ideas, concepts, or techniques contained in information provided through this site.
Any questions? Gentgeen 06:42, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
MediaWiki talk:Cantrollback

message: I saw this in recent changes and read it as "Can troll back". I thought it was going to be a message to making trolling easier. How disappointing. :) Angela. 06:45, Jan 12, 2004 (UTC)
:After 7 1/2 years, this still cracks me up :) Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

message: This message no longer seems to support HTML. Wikitext might work; try that. (You can test it by attempting to rollback any page to which you are the only contributor) – Gurch 14:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed, works. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displaying wrongly 

message: Please wrap
 • [ delete]
in
 • [ delete]
to hide the delete button from non-admins, who cannot use it. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:10, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, , for the useful request. I have implemented the change in Special:Diff/927736706 on your behalf. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks DannyS712 (talk) 21:17, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 24 November 2019 

message: Hello, administrators…
This one cannot be fixed via Phabricator, as this is local customization.
However, I have a bone to pick with  as always.
It looks like we can actually use Special:PageHistory to get the same link.
For that matter, for administrators, we can use Special:Delete.
In wikitext, it should look like this:
Could not revert the edit as the last contributor is the only author of this page (view history • delete).
It should render like this:
Could not revert the edit as the last contributor is the only author of this page (view history • delete).
Again, feel free to decline if there is still consensus to use  for links like these. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 16:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: (tested that it still worked) - using the Special pages is fine, so long as the interface supports them. — xaosflux Talk 10:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Xaosflux—The interface page is still a bit broken; it looks like I made an error in my edit request. Apologies. It looks like we need to wrap the closing span tag before, not after the closing parentheses so it doesn't look broken. Thanks. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 23:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @3PPYB6 ok  — xaosflux Talk 00:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 8 April 2022
Talk:Positive psychology

message: — Assignment last updated by Babradu (talk) 17:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of Financial Planning II

message: — Assignment last updated by Philip2511 (talk) 16:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PSYC 115 General Psychology

message: — Assignment last updated by Sj4452 (talk) 01:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: — Assignment last updated by AngelOffley (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone
Talk:List of airports by IATA airport code: C

message: You my add CGN for Cologne, Germany. Should be mentioned: it´s also an emergency runway for the Space Shuttle (from Cologne, Germany)
---
CBG is a mildly interesting case. It's used for the small airport at Cambridge, and IATA's own site confirms this . However, a bunch of people  , including even parts of the US government , are under the impression that it's the code for Cambridge, Minnesota. Maybe we should mention that in the entry, as well. Is this an example of a clash between FAA-allocated and IATA-allocated codes? Marnanel 23:51, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)
The CDW code links to the article for the corporation by the same name, so I've removed that link for now.  Other suggestions?  Should a new article called "CDW (airport)" be created, or should a disambiguation page be put in place, renaming the current CDW article to "CDW (corporation)"? Tim Messer 23:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Flag of Benin

message: red symbolizes red? ;-)
Is this a joke, or did the author of this lines just not know what it symbolizes?
--zeno 11:16, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for alerting me to the mistake, it was due to nothing but carelessness.
ThaGrind 00:56, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: On the Benin Empire page, it shows a red flag with what appears to be one man killing another man. Why is this one not on the flag page?
The Benin Empire, despite the name, has little to do with the modern Republic of Benin. Rather it was a kingdom in what is now Nigeria. The area we now know as Benin did not have that name until 1975. Monkeyman427 (talk) 12:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  where's the latest flag?
Talk:Wolf Rüdiger Hess

message: How does "unapologetic Nazi and fervent believer in Adolf Hitler" go together?
Shouldn't it be "apologetic Nazi"? and if so, are there any sources for that?
I don't question it, but with a source it would be more convincing.
It means someone who believes that what Hitler and the Nazis did was right, and makes no apologies for them. [www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b7c3ad4629f.htm Source here]
*"At the other was Wolf- Rudiger Hess, a man full of hatred who embraces the Nazi ideology"
*"A gloomy, ravaged character, he came to life only through his boundless admiration for Hitler." 
*His views can be roughly summed up as follows: racial segregation is the only solution, under the leadership of the whites."
→Raul654 12:02, Jan 12, 2004 (UTC)
It's vital to get the details totally correct so I'm not so sure about the source quoted really, having a third party who's a Times journalist make these judgements surely doesn't count. 
Also not sure how someone who was eight at the end of the war can be correctly identified as a Nazi, being as he wasn't old enough to even join the HJ. PhilipPage 19:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hunedoara

message: It looks like Hunedoara and Hunedoara (county) are supposed to be different articles, but right now both are about the county. Hunedoara should be changed to be about the city of Hunedoara. - UtherSRG 13:16, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ""Hunyadi" is a more internationally recognized name for the same family, "Corvins" being used only by Romanians and Hungarians."
sic! Wishful thinking embodied in official revisionism often substitutes for fact in that whole part of Europe. Probably not worth editing. --Wetman 02:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone recognize [[Matthias Corvinus]] in this?
Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774)

message: "aimed at the return of the territories of ancient Rus lost to foreign invaders centuries before that."
Siberia, Armenia, Azerbeijan, Georgia, Kasakhstan ....... Interesting... . Sorry for that edit, but this could not remain standing. Refdoc 15:25, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first important battle was fought at Hotin, Ottomans repulsed Russian attack. Ottoman victory should be added. Also in 1773, Ottomans fought back and scored several victories, those should be added, too.
If anyone doesn't have any objections, I am going to add those.Noyan Sipahi (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actions in 1769 and 1773 are missing 

message: This sentence doesn't make sense: "The war followed the external tensions within Poland." Or at least it's very unclear (I'm guessing that whoever wrote it had in mind a central subject which the war was external to - in other words, writing from the perspective of a particular country). Volunteer Marek  16:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-contradictory sentence 

message: You cannot call this Russo-Turkish war becasue Turkey did not exist until later in the XX century. The correct name is Russo-Ottoman war.
213.27.190.94 (talk) 13:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't a correct name. On Wikipedia we use the most common name used by English sources, which in this case is Russo-Turkish War. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russo-Turkish war is incorrect 

message: How can tiny Crimean Khaganate have 100.000 soldiers while great Russian Empire have 125.000 soldiers. it was not convincing at all. Can you explain this ? 200.000 Ottoman soldier is also not convincing. 176.90.207.41 (talk) 20:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armies 

message: In the article, Ottoman Empire is mentioned as Ottoman Empire or High Porte, but Russian Empire is mentioned as Russia (which is wrong). The correct way is Russian Empire. I'm suggesting renaming all "Russia" to "Russian Empire", if nobody objects.Iron Archer (talk) 16:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia or Russian Empire
Talk:Pseudo-acronym

message: I have completely removed the following from the article:
Anti-Acronym should be the pseudo or mocked "full names" that replace the original full name of an acronym, such as APB (All Points Bulletin) being parodied as the "All-American Pinkerton Boys", "Absolutely Penile Bullies"...    See apronym
A google search showed up a few instances of "anti-acronym" as a synonym for "pseudo-acronym" (justifying the redirect), but none for the use suggested (which is already covered by apronym and/or backronym.  This would therefore seem to be either misinformed or wishful-thinking. I'm leaving this note in case anyone disagrees and wants to discuss this further. - IMSoP 16:06, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have proposed deletion, and this should be followed by redirects, and minor edits to the redirect targets to cover this subject, which is thin if it exists at all. "This article seems to lack a definite subject -- it gathers things covered by folk etymology, false etymology and acronym/ backronym" DavidOaks (talk) 13:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Acronym 

message: How is ISO a pseudo-acronym? The page even gives the definition of the acronym.
: I would guess because none of the definitions are of the form "I... S... O...". It apparently doesn't stand for "Interntational Standards Organization". —Ben FrantzDale 11:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO 

message: I've removed the deletion template.  I stumbled upon this page in the context of looking up ZFS.  I've found the collection of pseudo-acronyms to be quite useful and enlightening.  Andrew73 (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion proposal

message: Microsoft's OS Windows XP
XP Stands for "Experience".
Is this beyond pseudo-acronym? — MrBucketT/C 06:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  XP 

message: Isn't the Microsoft .NET Framework an example of a psuedo-acronym? –-Cwenger (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: .NET

message: PHP stands for PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor. It’s certainly a recursive acronym, but I see no reason it qualifies as an anti-acronym. The acronym defines—not contradicts—itself. I’m removing it for now. Also, I’m concerned about the term anti-acronym’s neologistic nature. So far I’ve been unable to find any support for its existence and noticed that early revisions of this page start with: “A pseudo-acronym, also sometimes referred to as an anti-acronym, is an acronym which officially doesn't stand for anything.” Are we blindly throwing around terms here?
Dmyersturnbull (talk) 07:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: PHP and neologism

message: Got rid of unsourced definitions and examples. These should not be restored without WP:RS. DavidOaks (talk) 12:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup