lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Philip Wiegratz

message: I'm not sure about when his birthday was; when I checked it on Google site search, some websites says his date of birth was 7 February while others say 17 February, both 1993. Some, if not all, of the websites are certainly wrong and that bit of information is not even sourced properly. I also started a similar discussion on Talk:AnnaSophia Robb about this possible reliable source issue but no-one else has come by to at least vote on that yet. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 15:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: i have changed it to February 1993 for now, until someone finds a reliable source FMSky (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate
Talk:Mechanical splice

message: --Srleffler (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need an image 

message: Working on making some improvements to the article. Found sources that expand upon the concept and will be adding more detailed sections. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Fiber Optic Association). Edits are in my sandbox and will be posted today.
Ashburystreet (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned Edits
Talk:Abbe sine condition

message: Under Carl Zeiss's article, it mentions that the Abbe sine condition was formulated under the combined efforts of Ernst Abbe and Carl Zeiss.  Should we not also include Carl Zeiss's contribution in this article?
:The Abbe sine condition was formulated by Ernst Abbe. Zeiss might have inspired him, but it was really not his field of expertise.--Afluegel (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl Zeiss
Talk:Radiant intensity

message: It would add interest to this article if we could rank some visible stars according to radiant intensity.  Since absolute magnitude is based on the visible portion of the EM spectrum, I have no idea how to go about this.  I know where to go look up lists of visible stars ranked by absolute magnitude, but I've no idea where to find a list of visible stars ranked by radiant intensity.  This would need the attention of a qualified astrophysicist or astronomer.  --arkuat (talk) 06:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  a list of some visible stars, ranked by radiant intensity? 

message: Dear main author(s); I know that textbooks sometimes disagree when it comes to the letters used for radiant flux and related quantities. However, the IUPAP is the authorative reference for notation in physics, not textbooks. (At least that's what I was taught.) In their SUNAMCO RED BOOK (it can be found with google), 1987 revision, 2010 reprint, they give I or Ie for radiant intensity (p. 33). There is no index Ω. Besides, the index Ω is redundant, because radiant flux is Φ, so when going to radiant intensity = radiant flux per solid angle, we already have a change of symbol. Suggestion: remove the index Ω. Regards, Herbmuell (talk) 00:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me.--Srleffler (talk) 05:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Not originally, but a year or two ago one editor went through all of the articles and introduced that notation.--Srleffler (talk) 05:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Index Omega
Talk:Techni-Tool

message: ==Untitled==
I re-wrote this article to try and meet your criteria. 
I don't feel there is any advertising, it is all historical fact, intended to give information about the company that will delineate it from two other companies with the same name.
There are links all over the web to this company's website, from non-affiliated parties. This should allow it to meet the criteria, if I read the rules correctly.
:Better. I'm not sure - we'll wait and see what the admin who looks at this does. Blood red sandman 19:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten=

message: I re-wrote this article to try and meet your criteria. 
I don't feel there is any advertising, it is all historical fact, intended to give information about the company that will delineate it from two other companies with the same name.
There are links all over the web to this company's website, from non-affiliated parties. This should allow it to meet the criteria, if I read the rules correctly.
:Better. I'm not sure - we'll wait and see what the admin who looks at this does. Blood red sandman 19:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am concerned that this article is just an advertisement.  All of the references are either corporate web sites, catalogs, or a how to guide that mentions a purchase from the company.  There are no references from either trade press, general press, or any other article that talks about the company except as a mention in passing.  Is a single award from a supplier enough to be notable?.  A search of Google showed a lot of companies with a very similar name, but hardly any links about this company.  And a search of new.google showed zero hits.  But if this article could be improved with less advertising and a better claim of notability, maybe it should survive. So I will wait a few days before I tag it as an non-notable advertisement. WVhybrid 04:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns of advertising and notability
Talk:Sallah

message: Quick correction - The room with the Asps was the one that housed the Ark; the Well of Souls was the room with the map, and contained no asps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.129.167.114 (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Noted that on the 12 of July, all instances of the name in this article were changed to "Yallah": I rolled it back, assuming vandalism, but does some higher power of cultural sensitivity or Indiana Jones-loving want to tell me otherwise?
LHefferman (talk) 02:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Correction?

message: I have a question regarding the second paragraph in the “Character” section.  Someone wrote that in the Last Crusade, Sallah is a “bumbling stereotype who for example, calls a tank a ‘Steel Beast.’”  This strikes me a personal interpretation of the character, and not an objective evaluation.  To be sure, the character of Marcus Brody was made “bumbling,” but I didn’t see anything that indicated a significant change in the Sallah character.  There is a discussion to be had regarding the use of racial and ethnic stereotypes in the Indiana Jones franchise, but I never envisioned that discussion around Sallah.  As for his use of the phrase “steel beast”, I have always assumed he was just using a creative metaphor, and did not reflect anything about his character.  In the past, there have cases in cinema where certain phrases have been used to indicate a lack of civilization and/or intelligence. I am thinking of the “iron horse” phrase often used by Native American characters in old westerns, but I don’t think that’s what’s happening here.  I’ve never thought of Sallah as a stereotypical character.  I could be wrong, of course, but I thought we ought to discuss it first. Thoughts? -Fogelmatrix (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steel Beast?
Talk:Luneburg lens

message: The term Dielectric lens redirects to this article.  Dielectric lenses are lenses used to focus radio waves or microwaves instead of light, and are used in microwave antennas.  There are many types, the Luneburg lens is just one of them.  Dielectric lenses are not covered adequately by this article. so I don't think this article should be the target for that term.  Is there a better target for it, or should a new Dielectric lenses article be written? --ChetvornoTALK 06:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirects are often used as placeholders for articles that have not yet been created. Feel free to change  into an actual article, if you know enough about them to get it started. Don't create Dielectric lenses: article names are supposed to be singular, not plural.--Srleffler (talk) 06:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I think I'll talk to some other editors of electronic articles before creating the article, to see what new articles they think we need in this area.  In addition to dielectric lenses there are also several other types of lens antennas, none of which are currently covered in WP. Maybe it would be better to have a Lens antenna article to cover all these types.  --ChetvornoTALK 22:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be the redirect for [[Dielectric lens]]?
Talk:Hyperradiant Fresnel lens

message: Would I be correct is saying that a Hyperradiant Fresnel lens is like a regular Fresnel lens, but in the shape of a cylinder, rather than a disc? CybergothiChé (talk) 03:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: true, but not the full story Lugnad (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 

message: Stephenson claimed he was first, but the courts ruled otherwise and awarded Wigham £2500 Lugnad (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This source; The Cape Race Light Station Technical Information does in fact show that he was the first, it was mentioned by someone else, then him again, consistent with the article. I did not dig deep but with the above court ruling referenced (that was not provided) and the source I provided (can look for more) then I would say we need to present both sides. Otr500 (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The USLS page (now added as a ref) covers this now...Jokulhlaup (talk) 11:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Is there a particular reason we should "note the men on the gallery" standing by the light?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.211.83.94 (talk) 02:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: To provide a sense of scale, these are very large lenses...Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I still have NO IDEA what is meant by hyperradiant. Hyper (very, a lot, high) hyper what? What is meant by larger than 'first order'? not even clear what 'first order' is. 'Larger' doesn't apply to 'focal length' (LONGER). Something is very wrong with this article.
173.164.209.28 (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above. It's something I'd try to fix myself but I'm not a lighthouse or optics buff. There's a lot of unexplained terminology in the article and fixing it would be a quick way to boost the quality.Brammers (talk/c) 12:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperradiant?
Talk:Operation Falcon (USFWS operation)

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  JubalHarshaw 19:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: After a complaint to OTRS was reviewed, it became clear rather quickly that this article was seriously skewed to one point of view.  There didn't seem to be any way to rescue the article in that shape, so a rewrite from scratch using appropriate sources seems to be the best way to go.  Despite how many people might feel about the operation, the article needs to factually present both sides - it cannot sound like an opinion piece.  If anyone has any questions or concerns about the article or Wikipedia guidelines in general, I'd be happy to do what I can to help. Shell   babelfish 21:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubbification

message: Sorry I forgot this earlier - this is a list of the original references used in the article.
*Steubner, Stephen (2002). Cool North Wind: Morley Nelson's Life with Birds of Prey (Illustrated ed.). Caxton Press. pp. 429. ISBN 0870044265.
*http://www.themodernapprentice.com/5yr_study.doc (this appears to be a study, would suggest actual citation is necessary here)
*McKay, Paul. The Pilgrim and the Cowboy. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 1989. (ISBN 0-07-045317-9)
*North American Falconers Association (NAFA). "Longitudinal Analysis of Cases, Violations, and Citations involving the MBTA Regulations from January 1, 2000 through April 20, 2005." Hawk Chalk, Dec 2005. (this may be the correct citation for the study in the second reference)
* Department of the Interior News Release for Operation Falcon (1984).
* USFWS Falconry and Raptor Propagation Regulation Final Assessment (1988). (unreliable site?)
* The Peregrine Fund. (not certain what this was meant to reference, no inline citation given)
Shell   babelfish 01:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Original references
Talk:Simple lens

message: It seems like this article is entirely unnecessary. I suggest replacing it with a link to Lens_(optics)#Construction_of_simple_lenses. Thoughts/Comments? MarkoZhuk09 (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't redirect to that section, which is very focused on lens shapes. It would be better to redirect to the top of the article. Whether we should redirect really depends on whether there is the potential for this article to be of value. Could we expand this article a bit to make it more useful? Can it play a role distinct from the main lens article?--Srleffler (talk) 03:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Raman laser

message: "It is expected that these breakthroughs will greatly reduce the cost of optical computing and communications devices by 2010." ... so ... did it happen?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.118.94.188 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it didn't happen. Sentence removed. Raw Style (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
File talk:Hubble5.jpg

message: For some reason the Category:Nebula link isn't linking ot the Nebula category page... It's linking to an 'edit new page' page. Not sure why. The other category links work fine and link to the list of items in that category. Don't know why Category:Nebula is being obstinate. Mgmirkin 19:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Home business

message: I would ultimately (and shortly as time permits)like to write another article entitled Work at Home. This I feel would present a better understanding of what I am trying to accomplish here with work at home-based business information. The arena of Internet home marketing is becoming so complex that it is enough to make ones head spin. And I am not only refering to Internet Scams.
The proposed merger with small business should also be carefully considered! The two may go hand in hand in some aspects, but differ according to many variables and considerations...
Change is good!
 
Let's Talk;
:Should be merged with Homebased business, or vice versa, whichever term is most used. i have made a list of notable home based businesses there, searching for articles with "business" and "garage" in them. This really should also be a category.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link to home office went back to this article.  I've taken it out.  When someone has created another page we can put it back in. --196.202.26.209 (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyclical link
Talk:Peg leg

message: 'Famous peg leg wearers:' belongs before 'Historical', because it applies to both 'Historical' and 'Fictional'. Bejnar 19:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous peg leg wearers:

message: * :Clayton "Peg Leg" Bates (1907-1998), tap dancer
:removed because there are no Wikipedia links, and notability was not established.  Sites like "Peg Leg Bates" Bear Systems and "Honoree December 1991 Clayton "Peg Leg" Bates" South Carolina African-American History Online Bell South may provide enough information for a stub, and book research might create a full article.  However, he will also need to have links established from appropriate entertainment links, if he is notable. --Bejnar 02:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not necessary for a person to have a Wikipedia article for them to appear in a list of notable people. They must, of course, be notable and verifiable but there may not be enough material to write a full article or maybe no one has got around to writing it. SpinningSpark 07:01, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, notability has not been established for Clayton "Peg Leg" Bates. --Bejnar (talk) 17:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the featured photo of a generic prosthetic leg and not specifically a "peg leg"? As I understand it, "peg legs" are a specific type of artificial leg that are essentially a solid rod, usually tapering to a blunt end or other rounded cap at the bottom. There would be no bending "knee" featured and I would assume the bottom end would ordinarily not be sculpted into the shape of a foot. In fact, the entirety of the "leg" would be purely functional and thus would not be aesthetically carved to resemble a natural leg in any way (i.e. no thigh, hamstring, knee, shin, calf, ankle, foot, heel, sole, instep, toes, etc.). It would be as the name suggests, a basic "peg" leg. It is a "leg" only in function, not in appearance. The reading of the text of the article appears to confirm my understanding of the definition of "peg leg," though I'll admit there may be some ambiguity. Perhaps I have been brainwashed by the images of the cartoon pirates of my youth. Admittedly, dictionary definitions do not specify shape, merely defining "peg leg" as "artificial leg," which technically would include prosthetics carved or molded into a more natural, human leg-shape. However, the lack of specificity does not necessarily imply human leg-shaped prosthetics are included in a broadened definition of "peg leg." Would someone with more knowledge of this subject please clarify the distinction in the article and/or change the image if I am indeed correct in my assumption that "peg legs" are not the same as human leg-shaped prosthetics that feature bending "knees." Thank you66.91.36.8 (talk) 04:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Photo?
Talk:1999 European Grand Prix

message: I thought so.. 2A02:2121:6B7:2605:501:65E6:89FD:61E7 (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused. The infobox, lead and classification all identify Herbert as the winner. Where does it say someone else did? SSSB (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't it Herbert that won ?
Talk:How Sweet It Is (Jerry Garcia Band album)

message: Should the Pizza Tapes be included in the Jerry Garcia Band chronology? It is not technically a JGB album, but rather a collaberation between Garcia, Rice and Grisman. Moorematthews 17:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I realize you asked this question five years ago, but....  I agree, The Pizza Tapes is not a Jerry Garcia Band album. — Mudwater (Talk) 17:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pizza Tapes?
Talk:Moses Olaiya

message: Special:Permalink/719298786 contains a large amount of uncited material that I recently reverted. The material, added by Boisala1, was unfortunately not backed by any verifiable, non-original/non-primary and reliable sources, even if it may be true. Just an FYI/clarification on the good intention of the deletion. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 00:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of added material Boisala1 
Talk:Jimmy Reed

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Influenced Jerry Lee Leqis who recorded many of Read's sons.. such as You Don't Have To GO, Big BossMan, Bright Lights/Big City among them. 137.103.137.205 (talk) 02:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  jimmy read/influenced
Talk:Trevor Goddard

message: I'm Australian, I would never, ever be fooled by his "Australian" accent - sounds clearly Cockney Londoner to me. I never thought he was Australian (although acknowledge he played them sometimes), and not sure about him being accepted as one of "our own".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkfalz (talk • contribs) 06:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry we don't understand why the UK (whatever that means) think every American appearing on British shows is either from NYC or the deep south...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.168.152.76 (talk) 02:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 

message: According to the linked articles, he was 37 when he died; according to the birthdate given here, he was 40. Which one is correct? 109.91.157.219 (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age?
Talk:Korean bow

message: I am not trying to accuse the credibility of the picture given.  However, the picture is not good enough proof to prove that the Korean bow has a possible range of 1073 meters.
All the picture shows ia a Korean archer drawing back his bow.  I will admit that the bow is a recurved bow and the draw length is amazing.  However, this does not SHOW a range of 1073 meters.
If possible, I along with others who would truly like to be shown proof of a bow firing an arrow over 1000 meters (heck - over 400 meter is good in my book), would appreciate a better picture.  If possible, a link to a video that shows the uninterrupted flight of the arrow.BNgo 19:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Used to Prove Range of 1073 Meters

message: Firearrows are a gunpowder weapon and has nothing to do with bows. I've removed the picture of the firearrows.
Intranetusa 01:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Firearrows

message: Could we have some reference for this claim, please? I'd really like to know! Richard Keatinge 12:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gak gung used in Goryeo period?
Talk:Disabled Living Foundation

message: Hi everyone - it looks like this charity has been renamed "Living Made Easy." There are still quite a few sources online that refer to it as the Disabled Living Foundation (DLF), but it appears that the official name has been changed. I'm not sure if it makes sense to change the article name now or wait until more sources are referring to it as Living Made Easy. Thansks! Will (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to living made easy
Talk:Kagoshima

message: Can someone add a disambiguation between Kagoshima City, Kagoshima Prefecture, and whatever other Kagoshimas there are?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.119.8 (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kagoshima disambiguation request 

message: Kagoshima ramen has no explanation, and redirects to the ramen wiki, which doesn't explain this variety either. YellowAries2010 (talk) 03:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ramen
Talk:Aspen Comics

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Rose the Nose

message: Didn't this guy make his Jewish heritage pretty obvious in the book? I thought that was pretty interesting. And also it was interesting about the rumor that most of the people who held one of the higher ranks were mostly of Jewish descent. I don't remember the details in the book, but I think it'd be nice to have in the article. QueenStupid 20:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled