lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rutger Hauer filmography

message: His role in Smallville as Morgan Edge should be included. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallville 

message: What about The broken Key, 2017? 67.209.133.211 (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Key 

message: We should have a section for music videos. He appeared in at least one (Kylie Minogue's "On a Night Like This") SecretName101 (talk) 08:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music videos 

message: I think this ought to be in the filmography somewhere, especially as it's one of his last screen appearances.
it's definitely him, not deep-fake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d0iJ4lFKFQ
duncanrmi (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'dust' studios short, 2019
Talk:Rhomboteuthis lehmani

message: This article regards the species, not the genus. Should a separate page be created for the genus?
Firekong1 (talk) 13:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for the genus
Talk:Purolator

message: It states in the article on Purolator Courier that it was originally called "Trans Canada Courier", was bought in 1967 by the (American) Purolator Company - the manufacturer of oil and air filters - then returned to Canadian ownership in 1987, retaining the name Purolator, but having nothing to do with the US company of the same name or the oil filter business. RottenDog 02:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's way worse than that.  The corporate family tree for the name "Purolator" is very tangled--in essence, every company that bought a piece of a company that was formerly part of the Purolator family has retained the name (presumably for greater brand recognition).  There are about a dozen different "Purolator" companies, about a third of which are actually related nowadays.  This disambiguation page should probably grow into a page detailing this history, but that's going to take some work. Tlesher 18:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purolator Courier Manufactures Oil filters??
Talk:Luther Cressman

message: I'm not sure if the removal of the template is a case of WP:POINT, though deeming it useless is rather uncivil. The  template has a legitimate usage. Though the article is quite short, there is a list of references almost as long. If these aren't actually being used to back up facts in the article per WP:CITE, they should probably be moved to a "Further reading" section. Citing each fact in the article with in-text citations now will also make it easier when the article is added to by future editors. I'd like to hear why the template is useless. Latr, Katr 17:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Useless" template 
Talk:Bow Valley

message: This article says:
:It may be named for its resemblance to an archer's bow.
but Bow River says:
:The name "Bow" refers to the reeds that grew along its banks and which were used by the local First Nations peoples to make bows
Only one of these theories can be correct. Which?  Gdr 08:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology not consistent with [[Bow River]]
Talk:Bridge to Terabithia

message: I have tagged this page as WP:DABCONCEPT because the primary topic of the term is the story of a fictional world presented in various formats, where two childhood friends play out fantasies of a magical kingdom, and one of them dies, leaving the other to deal with the loss. bd2412 T 14:11, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DABCONCEPT]]

message: The usage of this article was discussed at Talk:Bridge to Terabithia (novel) in August 2014 -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: related move request
Talk:Index of feminism articles

message: just wondering CarolMooreDC (talk) 00:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Entries in indexes and lists can be annotated; entries in categories cannot be. On the other hand, categories are easier to compile, since they're automatically compiled, whereas lists and indexes have to be edited by hand to add, edit for, or delete each article. Nick Levinson (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

text: solve the problem in house and clear the case 2405:201:C039:C03D:39E6:9F8A:78:5D49 (talk) 14:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant to [[:Category:feminism]]?

message: No organizations are listed in the index, I think. Neither are people, but there's a list of feminists. I don't know if other feminist topics are missing. Categories are useful but they can't be annotated and the sidebar and nonsidebar templates are also useful but they can't be made too big. Is there a list or index of feminist organizations (and, if any other topics are missing, a list or index of those)? If not, should there be? Nick Levinson (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  organizations and any other missing topics
Talk:Feminism in the United Kingdom

message: Feminist history in the United Kingdom → Feminism in the United Kingdom — I think this article should be moved to Feminism in the United Kingdom to match the naming convention of similar articles. The article already defines its scope as including the present day, so there is no reason to limit it to historical events. Better to use the more general title and spin off a more specific article if needed later on. Kaldari (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, I agree. It makes more sense. --Mikitei (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 

message: I propose that we merge Feminism in 1950s Britain into the 20th century section of this article. I don't think we really need separate articles for each decade of feminism in an individual country, especially since this broader article is still so meager. Kaldari (talk) 00:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The intro says nothing - currently it's even incorrect so I've corrected it to say at least nothing correctly. This needs a proper intro. Ben Finn (talk) 15:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to clean it up a bit. Kaldari (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: I've been copy editing History of feminism, and it's a mess. It currently puts undue weight on British feminist history, so I'm moving and duplicating relevant chunks into this article. czar · · 21:44, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied stuff from [[History of feminism]] 

message: From 1950s Britain to 21st century there is a severe lack of information regarding feminism. Hope people can contribute  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:388:D000:1600:DC23:FF9E:94E5:3053 (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking information 

message: :Category: has been nominated for . You are encouraged to join the discussion  on the Categories for discussion page.AusLondonder (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD nomination of [[:Category:{{ucfirst:English feminists}}]] 

message: This article is at 137 kb and should be split into History of feminism in the United Kingdom and Timeline of feminism in the United Kingdom -- Jabbi (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too dense
Talk:Legal Adviser of the Department of State

message: I think this article: Office of the Legal Adviser should be merged here and turned into a redirect going here. Any objections?John Z 03:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support merging the articles. Gage (talk) 03:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: Redirected United States Department of State Office of the Legal Adviser here, wasn't much additional useful in the other article -
Here is its complete content, in case  the rulings mentioned deserve more prominenceJohn Z (talk) 05:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Obando Fertility Rites

message: Dragonbite 03:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: Religious or non-religious 124.106.172.213 (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fertility dance  

message: Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour. 123.253.49.134 (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fertility props and costumes
Talk:The Tablet (Brooklyn)

message: Dragonbite 03:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request
Talk:Shakespeare on the Saskatchewan

message: This article has unfortunately been edited extensively by two editors with undeclared conflicts of interest. It is poorly sourced and non-neutral. I will attempt to dig out a few third-party sources in the hope of salvaging it.
* http://www.canadiantheatre.com/dict.pl?term=Shakespeare%20on%20the%20Saskatchewan
* https://thetheatrelisting.ca/listings/shakespeare-on-the-saskatchewan-festival/
* https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/festival-theatre (brief mention, not good enough alone for notability's sake)
* Seagrave, Jayne (2017). All the World's a Stage: The Story of Vancouver's Bard on the Beach, Heritage House. ISBN 1772031763.
* https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatoon/shakespeare-on-the-saskatchewan-construction-upgrades-1.5117460
* https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/0523-news-shakespeare-tent
--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is at AfD, I will be somewhere around weak delete. ∯WBGconverse 19:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

text: Comment - Summoned by bot. This would be much better formatted as a an AfD. Regardless, I would support deletion for lack on notability. Meatsgains(talk) 01:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I think I need an objective third party to examine the notability of this topic. This article's sourcing and tone was never great, and it's gotten worse since the involvement of two COI editors.
It's certainly notable locally and provincially, but nationally/internationally it might be borderline. I've listed some sources above but I'd appreciate another editor with a bit of distance from the topic to have a look. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 02:17, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is at AfD, I will be somewhere around weak delete. ∯WBGconverse 19:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

text: Comment - Summoned by bot. This would be much better formatted as a an AfD. Regardless, I would support deletion for lack on notability. Meatsgains(talk) 01:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment
Talk:Rec (film)

message: Thanks to whoever reverted my edits after I'd spent 45 minutes clarifying this page. Nothing like keeping the status quo rather than allowing something to become better. Just to make it clear, I like this film, I'm learning Spanish at the moment and I can actually explain the plot. If you think you can do better, actually change what I've written (ironically, you reverted back to a less clear version that I MYSELF had written some days prior) rather than just pressing the reset button.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.71.161 (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cheers

message: At IBDM here they are claiming copyright for the same content, it has clearly gone one way or the other but I can't see which? Off2riorob (talk) 11:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation 

message: "REC follows a television reporter, Ángela Vidal, and her cameraman, Pablo, who cover the night shift in one of Barcelona's local fire stations for the fictional documentary television series While You're Asleep." - Actually, it is never explicitly stated that the movie respectively the fictional documentary within the movie are set in Barcelona. The only indicator for Barcelona is the writing on the backs of the firemen's jackets, but these are also never shown in a direct shot, one has to use the slow-motion or pause button to get to read them. --188.105.194.172 (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't they speak Catalan if it was set in Barcelona? Or is it a Spanish documentary set in Barcelona? 217.93.219.218 (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barcelona? 

message: How could one write an article about REC without mentioning Resident Evil ??? Before RECcording, REC meant Resident-Evil part C, because by 2006 when it was shot, only RE and RE-Apocalypse were out; REC was thus to be the 3rd ... and the third letter of the alphabet is C. Amongst fans, every one knows that: REC is, before all, inspired from RE universe. Now, good writers gotta add this peace of info in proper english in the main art Doublehp (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Late, but whatever: All of what you said is original research. Are you saying the third Resident Evil film was intended to be called Resident Evil C or was that just a fan name or whatever? (If it's a fan name, it holds even  weight.) Also, I doubt Resident Evil really served as a primary inspiration for this film: While no doubt having some degree of influence, there are literally thousands of zombie movies, books and other things out there, each with their own take on what a zombie virus is, does or where it came from. REC could have been inspired by any of them. Actually, although I haven't seen it I could make just as compelling an argument that Evil Dead inspired REC, yet we aren't including it in the article unless one of the people who conceived of the film says so. LazyBastardGuy 20:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE !!! 

message: I think it's high time we gave REC a series page. LazyBastardGuy 20:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series page
Talk:List of turnpikes in Maryland

message: It appears that Rockville to Frederick was never a turnpike:  --NE2 10:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other notes

message: Out of the 180 turnpikes listed in the table, 36 of them have wikilinks in the Name column.  However, almost all of these wikilinks are redirects to the turnpike's successor route instead of an article about the turnpike itself.  For instance, the Falls Turnpike redirects to Maryland Route 25.  While on some level these redirects are appropriate, it is also disingenuous if the destination article has no details on the turnpike.  Also, the turnpike table already mentions the successor highways, so a redirect should not be necessary. Here is a list of turnpikes and the successor route the wikilink redirects to:
*National Turnpike: National Road
*Baltimore and Frederick-town Turnpike: Maryland Route 144
*Baltimore and York-town Turnpike: Maryland Route 45
*Falls Turnpike: Maryland Route 25
*Washington Turnpike: Maryland Route 355
*Columbia Turnpike: U.S. Route 29 in Maryland
*Washington and Baltimore Turnpike: U.S. Route 1 in Maryland
*Elk and Christiana Turnpike: Maryland Route 281
*Baltimore and Havre-de-Grace Turnpike: Maryland Route 7
*Westminster, Taney-town, and Emmitsburg Turnpike: Maryland Route 140
*Williamsport and Hagerstown Turnpike: U.S. Route 11 in Maryland
*Baltimore, Freedom and Liberty Turnpike and Baltimore and Liberty Turnpike: Maryland Route 26
*Frederick and Emmitsburg Turnpike: U.S. Route 15 in Maryland
*Hagerstown and Middleburg Turnpike: U.S. Route 11 in Maryland
*Westminster and Taneytown Turnpike: Maryland Route 140
*Woodsboro and Frederick Turnpike: Maryland Route 194
*Elkton, Andora and Lewisville Plank Road and Elkton, Andora and Lewisville Plank and Turnpike Road: Maryland Route 213
*Dulaney's Valley and Towsontown Turnpike: Maryland Route 146
*Buckeystown Turnpike: Maryland Route 85
*Liberty and Frederick Turnpike: Maryland Route 26
*Liberty and New Windsor Turnpike: Maryland Route 31
*Meredith's Ford and Jarrettsville Turnpike: Maryland Route 146
*Washington, Colesville and Ashton Turnpike: U.S. Route 29 in Maryland
*Mechanicsville and Finksburg Turnpike: Maryland Route 91
*Georgetown and Rockville Turnpike: Maryland Route 355
*Westminster and Meadow Branch Turnpike: Maryland Route 140
*Frederick and Ballinger Creek Turnpike: Maryland Route 351
*Frederick and Jefferson Turnpike: Maryland Route 180
*Monocacy and Urbana Turnpike: Maryland Route 355
*Frederick and Washington Turnpike: Maryland Route 355
*Ellicott City and Clarksville Turnpike: Maryland Route 108
 VC  17:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: List of redirects
Talk:Iconicity

message: Hi, I'm in the same class. I added the section on gesture calls and will add one more component to this article. I hope you like what my brain smarts done make.--MartinEvergreen (talk) 04:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

message: "Chimpanzees in the wild do not point, and rarely do so in captivity, however there is a documented case of one named Kanzi, described by Savage-Rumbaugh et al..." I am unsure whether the run-on sentence is part of the quote or not, so I am reluctant to fix it.
Quinnov (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in quote 

message: The section on sign languages states: "Further, the ability to modify sign meaning through phonological changes to signs is gaining attention. The ability to work creatively with sign language in this way has been associated with accomplished, or native signers." I have never heard about what is stated in the second sentence. Does anyone have a source? Falott (talk) 13:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sign languages 

message: Deleted paragraph:
I don't care particularly about my paragraph being deleted ―― in fact I don't see what the text of it was anywhere. I think, however, that the issue should be addressed of what place iconicity is assigned in language. The structuralist notion of "arbitrariness", with which the article contrasts iconicity, is often assumed or claimed (by those of the structuralist or other persuasions that think linguistics is not scientific if it does not make absolute predictions) to exclude things like iconicity, which only give partial explanations, which only express tendencies or motivations rather than true causes. For many of us who use the concept of iconicity it is indeed understood to be a motivation for some things, but not an absolute cause of everything under discussion. There is plenty of arbitrariness in the lexicon, for instance, and even cases that we would point to as iconically motivated are not at all predicted absolutely by that motivation. (Fwiw I have been involved in Cognitive Linguistics since the late 1970's.) Lavintzin (talk) 18:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I'll try another paragraph and see if remsense or whoever likes it better. Lavintzin (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph on iconicity not being prediction nor excluding arbitrariness
Talk:Stand Up For Science

message: Other than the DI's own publicity, the only sources confirming the existence of this campaign (as opposed to scientific rejection of ID more generally), were the WorldNet Daily (since removed as notoriously unreliable) and (only possibly and heavily implicitly) the 'stand up for REAL science' site -- hardly a prominent source. There is therefore little to establish notability. I would therefore suggest merging this obscure campaign into Discovery Institute intelligent design campaigns. HrafnTalkStalk 17:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and notability
Talk:Barrie North Collegiate Institute

message: I am a student at Barrie north collegite, it is a very nice school, and am very greatful for it. i recently had a misshap with this Dianne Flecher. She does not respect students in the proper manner as far as i am concerned, i know nothing can be done, but thank God school is only 4 years.
:Regardless of whatever happens in real life, adding "huge bitch" on Wikipedia after her name isn't right. If you really feel that way, why don't you speak to her personally instead of vandalizing? --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 10:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Thomasites

message: Dragonbite 03:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I am concerned that the embedded list violates WP:NLIST. While much of the content is verified not all individuals listed are notable. I am concerned, that the section might violate WP:NOTDIRECTORY.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embeded list 

message: Thomoasites 49.145.164.79 (talk) 02:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  People and religion 

message: Teachers included Holland Edwards Bell of the University of Texas and Mary Alice Bell of Mary Harden Baylor. They were sent to Appari in northern Luzon. A-daughter, Anna Virginia Bell was born there. 76.80.192.26 (talk) 04:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional teachers who traveled on The USAT  THOMAS WERE HOLLAND  BELL AND  MARY 

message: 4+ 3 206.62.42.37 (talk) 00:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math
Talk:United Nations Interpretation Service

message: Why are there lists of individual interpreters? I don't think these are sufficiently well known to be listed (some of them are for other reasons, but none are notable because they are interpreters). Without a good counterargument, I'll remove them in a few days time. Fram 12:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if no one ever compiled a list of these interpreters, then one can wonder if it is a good subject for here. We are a tertioary source, we report and condense what secondary sources have written. Compiling a list for which no secondary source exists is not the purpose of Wikipedia. And Wikipedia doesn't report because someone does his job well or badly, we report if people are notable (else we could delete our Paris Hilton article :-) ). Fram 14:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A United Nations directory is not a secondary source for people in the United Nations Interpretation Service... Fram 15:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of interpreters
Talk:Minne Lusa

message: "Designed by Omaha architects, it was built in 1889 in a classical style reflecting the influence of the 1898 Trans-Mississippi Exposition"
Was someone in 1889 equipped with a time machine, or should the wording be changed to say that the Exposition and pumping station buildings merely shared the same style?
Vintagejonny 01:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time errors? 
Talk:2001 Maccabiah Games

message: The 3rd link and the 1st footnote have highly divergent figures for the US medal count.  Can anyone determine which one is correct?  Tx. --Epeefleche 04:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus did Korea really win 3000 medals?  Pretty neat trick, given that they didn't seem to participate! —MicahBrwn (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Medal Count Discrepancy

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed