Talk:Brett Hull

message: In his list of international accomplishments, it's explicitly pointed out that he won a Silver medal at Salt Lake, but the '96 World Cup victory was arguably more spectacular in terms of achievements on the world stage. A note should be added there as well. Mojo Tooth 20:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Cup Victory 

message: Was this written by a bitter canadian? It fails to point out his Cup Winning goal WAS LEGAL BY THE RULES! Abd it makes no mention of the fact that he only opted to play for the us AFTER CANADA TURNED HIM DOWN. It needs some serious work.
: The article mentions both; what seemingly makes it "horrible" is that it doesn't push a partisan POV of which you would seem to approve.  Be that as it may, Hull's Cup-winning goal and his playing for the United States national team both were seriously controversial, and plainly still arouse passionate feelings.  No article on Hull would be encyclopedic without citing both incidents.  Ravenswing 04:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible article 

message: Just curious which flag should go next to Hull's name in articles where it's necessary.  The list of statistical leaders article is constantly being reverted back & forth between the US and Canada.  I think we should establish one standard and stick with it: either Canadian because of birth, or US because of international representation.  Personally I think it should be Canadian (and I say that as an American), but that's just my two cents (American, naturally, since they're worth more, lol).  Anthony Hit me up... 16:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian or American? 

message: Err ... why in tarnation is the lead image a shot of a uniform Hull wore for only five games at the end of his career?  Surely there's a shot of him in a Blues' jersey available somewhere ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ravenswing (talk • contribs) 13:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any image of Brett Hull (alone), will do. PS- this is an exhibition game photo (he's wearing #16). GoodDay 19:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Please incorporate the criticism into the article to present a more encyclopedic approach. Quadzilla99 14:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I'll bite.  What about its current presentation is "unencyclopedic?"   Ravenswing  14:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that it exists under a header that's titled criticism. Ever see one in Britannica? See the essay linked in the tag for a fuller explanation. Quadzilla99 04:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism section

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Brett Hull, Winnipeg South Monarchs.jpg Nominated for Deletion