Talk:Law of war

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Law of war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150202024354/http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php to http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130706212157/http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/civilians-illegal-targeting-of/ to http://www.crimesofwar.org/a-z-guide/civilians-illegal-targeting-of/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110910065308/http://www.firstthings.com/article/2007/01/michael-walzerjust-and-unjust-wars-1977-2 to http://www.firstthings.com/article/2007/01/michael-walzerjust-and-unjust-wars-1977-2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060210174905/http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/02/for-sake-of-warriors-accepting-limits.php to http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/02/for-sake-of-warriors-accepting-limits.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051129055913/http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2005/11/when-law-of-war-becomes-over-lawyered.php to http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2005/11/when-law-of-war-becomes-over-lawyered.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Law of war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070711062427/http://www.sipri.org/contents/cbwarfare/cbw_research_doc/cbw_historical/cbw_historical/cbw-lawswar.html to http://www.sipri.org/contents/cbwarfare/cbw_research_doc/cbw_historical/cbw_historical/cbw-lawswar.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section is covered by WP:External links, specifically ELPOINTS #3, WP:ELMIN, as well as WP:NOTREPOSITORY. Moved trimmed section here for any possible discussion on the links:
* For the Sake of Warriors: Accepting the Limits of the Law of War
* The Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law and free access to a Documentation Database of primary source materials.
* When the Law of War Becomes Over-lawyered, JURIST
* International Law on the Bombing of Civilians (Gene Dannen).
* A Brief Primer on International Law, 2007. With cases and commentary. (Nathaniel Burney)
* What is a war crime? BBC online 31 July 2003 (Tarik Kafala).
* United Nations: international law
--  Otr500 (talk) 14:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: The article has several  historical examples then skips to “modern“ which I interpret as after the late 19th century (say, the first Geneva convention). However, in wikipedia, I have often come across references to the accepted laws of war, from about 1650 to 1850. But I can’t find a source which states these “accepted laws of war“. Even negative examples of “generally accepted“ would be useful. Generally accepted, of course, means that both sides in the conflict agree that an action was unacceptable. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More needed about the pre-modern period 

message: “During conflict, punishment for violating the laws of war may consist of a specific, deliberate and limited violation of the laws of war in reprisal.[citation needed]”
I’m not a lawyer, but wouldn’t this then have entitled German Jews to murder millions of Germans and take their possessions?  This doesn’t seem to make sense. 97.104.75.33 (talk) 08:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remedies for Violations