Talk:Prince Claus of the Netherlands

message: The article currently states:  "He was also a member of Nazi youth organisations such as Jungvolk and Hitlerjugend (said to be automatic for all members of his generation)."  I'm fairly certain that the parenthetical comment is not true (that is, that membership in the Hitler Youth was not automatic) but wouldn't want to stake anything on it.  I don't want to take it out without more knowledge, but I do want to flag it for someone who perhaps knows more.  Remes 04:39, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, "In 1944, he was conscripted into the German Wehrmacht, becoming a soldier in the German 90th Panzergrenadier Division in Italy in March 1945.[2]" This is a photograph of him in his uniform of the Totenkopf Division of the Waffen SS. HET VERHAAL OVER PRINS CLAUS DAT NIEMAND MOCHT LEZEN, 27 SEPTEMBER 2015, collection Gerard de Boer. 2001:1C00:1E31:5F00:A133:B0C5:5BD4:D215 (talk) 09:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler youth 

message: Was Prince his official royal title?--Wasabe3543 04:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official rank? 

message: "Many also believed that these restrictions were at least partly the cause of his severe depression, which lasted many years."
This is not a diagnosis of Clinical Depression.
:Michael David 14:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinical Depression? 

message: :Image:Beatrixandclausdancing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This bot seems to be malfunctioning because there IS a FU rationale with the image. The bot's talk page has many mentions of it incorrectly tagging FU images so I think this is another case. Someone else has already reverted the bot's edits to the image. Rpvdk 07:21, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beatrixandclausdancing.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Prince Claus of the Netherlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120112084738/http://nos.nl/video/47116-prins-claus-wars-van-protocol-2002.html to http://nos.nl/video/47116-prins-claus-wars-van-protocol-2002.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220031/http://www.anp-archief.nl/attachment/87416 to http://www.anp-archief.nl/attachment/87416
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603071913/http://www.anp-archief.nl/page/2225053/nl to http://www.anp-archief.nl/page/2225053/nl
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055020/http://fast.mediamatic.nl/f/tqgr/image/844/87273-800-794.jpg to http://fast.mediamatic.nl/f/tqgr/image/844/87273-800-794.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090328023702/http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/english/content.jsp?objectid=13929 to http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/english/content.jsp?objectid=13929
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101204051702/http://www.iss.nl/About-ISS/History/Honorary-Fellows to http://www.iss.nl/About-ISS/History/Honorary-Fellows
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The name of Claus in Wikipedia is "Prince Claus of the Netherlands". 
I believe that he should have the name of "Claus von Amsberg", because he was born with this name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonarchyLover (talk • contribs) 20:12, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. GoodDay (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

text: No, I disagree as per WP:CONSORTS. He was/is primarly known as "Prince Claus of the Netherlands". Mr. D. E. Mophon (talk) 01:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAME 

message: Shall we add Prince consort in a  the infobox’s title parameter Ethan2345678 (talk) 09:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does he has “Prince Consort” title 

message: I'm guessing that "Grand Corodn" > "Grand Cordon" ? R. Henrik Nilsson (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Grand Corodn" > "Grand Cordon" ?