Talk:List of rail accidents (1950–1959)

message: Most discussions about this page probably also apply to the List of rail accidents page and probably should be placed on that Talk page.  (This is just a suggestion to keep consistency across the pages.  If you do have an issue that affects only this page, by all means post it here.)  Rmarquet 00:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just chanced on this page and wonder why the flags of England and Scotland are being used instead of the United Kingdom. There are also long-running issues over whether the Ulster Banner is appropriate. In fact, why are any flags being used? I don't think it adds anything much to the article. Sam Blacketer 19:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags

message: :Image:DR-03-0078-adn.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:DR-03-0078-adn.jpg

message: :Image:Italicus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Italicus.jpg

message: Hi, came here fact-checking a change to 1990 that mentioned a crash at Ghotki, listed here as Sangi train station near Sukkur (4 Jan). The number killed is unclear, NYT lists 'over 200', here its 307. However, there's another crash not listed here - 100 dead in crash near Ghotki, 1991, when the Karachi to Lahore train hit a parked freight carriage. Bazzargh (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Accidents at Ghotki 

message: The image :Image:Cajon Pass cover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:Image:Taunton-sleeping-car-fire.jpg
*:      Image:Clapham Junction Railway Accident - Hidden Report cover - HMSO.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Cajon Pass cover.jpg

message: *  January 1, 1998 – The Indore - Jabalpur 8233 Narmada Express catches fire in the 3 Air Conditioned Class bogie on Bhopal Habibganj railway station of Bhopal, the capital of Madhya Pradesh resulting in the killing of around 1625 people.
:No citation, not mentioned in List of Indian rail incidents#1998. Ning-ning (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Narmada Express Fire (1998)

message: * Support - The article is too big, but I favour splitting these List of rail accidents articles into decades, at least back to 1880 (if not earlier), as I've already mentioned in the recent talk in what is now Talk:List of rail accidents (pre-1900)‎. Tim PF (talk) 16:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to see you coming around.  Don't forget that I've also advocated using a top-navigation template for these articles, which should really be implemented before doing any more splits. Tim PF (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You should know that I've just created four sandboxes for Lists of rail accidents in the 1960's, 1970's, 1980's, and 1990's. There are broken references for every decade except the 1960's for some reason. I strongly urge you to add whatever elements are necessary for these articles, split them off promplty, and rename this one List of rail accidents (1950-1959). ----DanTD (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've knocked up a template  (Template:Lists of rail accidents), which should look like below.  It needs including into all the set of articles, including those in your sandbox.  Do you think the links should be piped like that, or unpiped raw? Tim PF (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  List of rail accidents (1990–1999) is now live, the 2 templates ( and  updated, and the article hamstrung (Added  tag and "hid" links to data referring to the 1990s).  Could you check that I've not messed up, please?  I've actually left the 1990s data in this article, one or other of us can remove 1960-1999 in one go at just before rename.  I'll try and tackle another decade or three on Thursday. Tim PF (talk) 00:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just renamed this article tonight. If I can find anything missing, from the 1990's one, I can always search through the history of this one. In the meantime I await your handiwork with the next three lists. You already know where to grab the sandboxes. ----DanTD (talk) 01:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Sorry. Will this interfere with your ability to split-off the other three decades from the list? ----DanTD (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not a real problem, but laid up in bed with man flu is (I think I need to allow up to an hour per article, so it's finding time to concentrate for perhaps 3 hours). Tim PF (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I  hope you realize that some of the reference links are still broken, and I'm in the process of preparing for a vacation this week, IRL. I'll add the 1980's list this morning, but you're going to have to do some work on this too. ----DanTD (talk) 12:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE - All four other decades have now been split-off from this list. Make whatever fixes are necessary. ----DanTD (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay; did you sort out all the references? Tim PF (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the broken ones, at least. Unfortunatley, I found more on this list that could be added to the others. Perhaps you can check on that. Ready to rename this one yet? ----DanTD (talk) 14:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't follow you: what could be added to the others?  Could we do the rename about 5 hours hence, probably at about 9pm UK time (4pm EDT)? Tim PF (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this version has separate chapters for Notes, reference, and other external links, that the chapters that were split-off don't have. I just hid a second "references" chapter in the 1990's list, and if it's appropriate, I may expose it, and rename the existing reference chapter "notes." As for waiting to rename this one, I don't mind, but I'd like to be able to remove those that aren't from the 1950's before this. ----DanTD (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Rename done -- I'll take the split and under_construction templates out a little later. Tim PF (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm closing this thread, because this mission was accomplished over a year ago. ----DanTD (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split 

message: The following entries were removed as they were unreferenced. Feel free to reference and re-add them. Mjroots (talk) 06:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced items removed

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of rail accidents by country which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Just noticed that an entry for 8 November in Argentina has just been tagged as unreferenced, dont have a problem with that but just concerned that the edit summary by :User:Akld guy as  Unreferenced. Incident will be removed in 48 hours is a bit quick I would expect it to be left tagged for a bit longer possibly weeks as not all watchers are around everyday, so just to note that 48 hrs is not a lot of time in wikiland. MilborneOne (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The onus was on the editor who added the incident to provide a reference. In this case, within a few minutes of his addition I added the citation needed tag and advised him on his Talk page that a reference was required. It's not like the incident had been there for a long time with the editor long gone. This was caught within minutes and the editor notified, so if he doesn't provide a reference within 48 hours, it's going to be deleted. He's lucky I gave him so long under the circumstances. Akld guy (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, happy with your explanation. MilborneOne (talk) 20:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced edit

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of rail accidents (1950–59). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203050/http://www.rssb.co.uk/a2z.asp?section=date&sort=Date&order=desc&show=10 to http://www.rssb.co.uk/a2z.asp?section=date&sort=Date&order=desc&show=10
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of rail accidents (1950–59). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131027210427/http://saugeenrailtrail.com/main.php?page=train to http://www.saugeenrailtrail.com/main.php?page=train
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified