lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:States of the Federal Republic of Germany

message: There might not have been a formally agreed standard, but visual consistency is still good, even moreso on an encyclopedic project like Wikipedia. All of the Subdivision footers (with the esception of the british districts ones, which follow a different, but established scheme) now follow a format thatwas already more or less existent, although not consistenty applied. So far this template is the only one where there has been revert. For the most part, what I did was overhaul the code and standardize the location of the flag images.
In addition, I believe the current template to take too much vertical space, and that the use of both the coats of arms and flag is unnecessary. The flag alone is good enough a visual represtation, especially as a good amount of iusers are unlikely to be familiar with the German coats of arms. Circeus 15:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wiping out a lot of people's work with your activity here, so you might be better off going to the project and see if you get an agreement on the standard before you impose it yourself. As I can tell the current status is that it clearly states no standard exists. On improving the code, I'm all for that, but we should discuss coding issues rather than replacing one poor set of code with another. I also objected to your Poland redesign, but I didn't revert you on it. ~ trialsanderrors 17:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency and the lack of a standard

message: WP:MOSFLAG takes priority here until there is a consensus otherwise to include the flags. If we want flags shown we need consensus first. Please be mindful though of the burden upon servers that graphics place on Wikipedia, their political connotations, and how Wikipedia is not Myspace. I am prepared to protect the template if edit warring continues without discussion. --Jza84 |  Talk   22:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:MOSFLAG]] 

message: The flag usually seen is the one with rhombuses, not the one with stripes. Both are equally official:
"The Bavarian State Flags 
The Free State of Bavaria has two official flags, one with stripes and one with rhombuses, of equal status  [my emphasis]. The striped flag consists of two equal horizontal stripes in the Bavarian colours, white on top, blue below. The rhomboid flag consists of at least 21 white and blue rhombuses including the incomplete ones at the edges of the flag. Long thin flags can include more rhombuses. In any case, however, the heraldic top right-hand corner (that is the top left-hand corner from the point of view of the observer) must be occupied by an incomplete white rhombus." [Source: ]
--Boson (talk) 00:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bavarian flag 

message: Hi, why is the coat of arms of Bremen (state) not showing up here? As well as the ones of former states. Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 09:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bremen CoA?
Talk:Mashing

message: The final sentence of the mash tun section currently reads: 
Using a lauter tun limits the breweries to single-step infusion mashing, however, because such a vessel is not completely appropriate for the lautering process[cite?].
I'm guessing "lautering process" was written instead of "mashing process" by mistake. Even with that change though, it seems like an odd claim to make, especially given the rising popularity of all-in-one brewing systems at the homebrew level. What would prevent a small scale commercial brewery from using a single vessel for a multi-step mash and lautering? 193.61.207.188 (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit needed in "Mash tun" section
Talk:MW

message: A couple of hundred articles link to this page and, judging by the titles, every one of them means megawatt. Therefore I propose to rename this page to MW (disambiguation) and redirect MW to megawatt and add a hatnote to megawatt to redirect any other meanings back to the the disambiguation page. I'll do it next week if there are no objections. Colonies Chris (talk) 13:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, seems sensible. MURGH disc. 01:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirect to [[megawatt]]
Talk:Bishop Fenwick High School

message: To the user ar 71.72.200.234: In the past you have vandalized the page, adding the "n" word as a notable alumnus.  If you are going to contribute, please register and indicate why you think an alumnus is notable.  Mfields1 15:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: nn-warn The notable alumni is not well researched; some of the listees don't meet wikipedia's guidelines for Wikipedia:Notability (people).  None of the listees are linked to other pages.  Mfields1 00:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni
Talk:Arkham Asylum – Shock Therapy

message: After a few rounds of trial and error, I finally uploaded my first Wikipedia image! Hopefully the size and everything is okay. Jedd the Jedi 07:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Image

message: While Arkham's dismantling has begun and it has been removed from the park website, no formal announcement regarding its retirement has been made and no WP:RS have covered this subject yet. We need to retain the status quo until we can verify the ride has officially been retired. , having now reverted my changes twice, please now provide a reliable source that confirms Arkham's closure. — CR4ZE (T • C) 08:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ride closure 

message: The coaster hasta operated since 2019 and i migth not know what Will happen to its spot Samuelisnice (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Will replace It if It Closed permanently
Talk:Airborne (1993 film)

message: Can anyone point me toward information on the designing of the characters in the Wildstorm Comics series Wildsiderz on the actors in the film Airborne? I read about it  a few years ago when the comic was in its early stages, but I can't fins a reference to it now. Thanks, Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 19:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wildsiderz 

message: Someone needs to clean this article up. It's poorly written and needs citations. IronCrow 16:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, the prose reads like a 4th grader's poorly written book report in its current state.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.146.235 (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I took a first stab at updating the plot into a more coherent and hopefully eloquent synopsis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.146.235 (talk) 20:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Written 

message: Is this film on DVD yet?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.238.241.191 (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD 

message: I know this is arguably the most hilarious movie ever made, but I'm going to try to take a more serious look at the wikipage. I plan on editing some of the plot points that may seem confusing, elaborate on some aspects which are briefly depicted on the page and fix up the quotations section. I know there are a lot of people who secretly love this movie, so I'm going to try and give them a little more from the wikipage.BrianSfinasSSI (talk) 15:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not seen the film, but I saw this discussion on the recent changes page. I added a "Find sources" template above that can be used to find references for this article. MOS:FILM is also a good guide. Let me know if you need help! Erik (talk | contribs) 16:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Large changes
Category talk:Provincial and territorial highways in Canada

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>.  RayGates 15:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of sub-categories of this category
Category talk:British Columbia provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in British Columbia.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category 

message: There are quite a few BC Highways that have been tagged as part of the BC Project and many others that appear in :Category:British Columbia provincial highways that are not yet part of the project.  Although I have looked only at a few of these, they would all seem to be appropriately tagged as .  If some are less complete than what I have seen, they might be a stub class instead of a start class.  There may also be some well developed articles that are B class.  Of course it is not for me to say how they should be assessed, but those are my suggestions.  It would be useful if these could all be tagged, but when doing it, please assess them as well.  Useful content by the way and a big job.  My thanks to those who have created the content. --KenWalker | Talk 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: BC Project Assessment
Category talk:Manitoba provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in Manitoba.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category
Category talk:New Brunswick provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in New Brunswick.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category
Category talk:Nova Scotia provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in Nova Scotia.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category 

message: Route 242 is out of order.  I do not understand how to fix tables like this...can anyone give advice?
(I posted this back in November 06 but forgot to sign it.)  (Psyklek 03:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in order
Talk:Sandwell

message: West Bromwich is the largest town in Sandwell, however due to the rivalry between West Bromwich and Smethwick (former centres of West Bromwich and Warley respectively) the council headquarters are based in Oldbury.
-- Any proof of this, this to me (living in Sandwell) sounds just like a load of nonsense! --81.174.250.220 16:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The siting of the Council House

message: It may be worth incorporating something about Sandwell the place, as opposed to the valley or Priory. Sandwell itself is effectively the area between Soho, Handsworth, Smethwick, and Junction 1 of the M5, at the southern end of Sandwell Valley. DWaterson 13:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may well be worth putting something in about the slightly confusing situation that Sandwell is also the name a former ward of Birmingham, just over the border from Sandwell MBC. Fingerpuppet 15:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sandwell the settlement

message: No mention of education in main article except for one college, and no link to the oddly-titled article Other secondary schools in Sandwell.   A whole lot of such schools had their articles turned into redirects to this, with no apparent discussion. Looks very odd, and presumably is the result of some curious local politics? Someone ought to sort it out, anyway, please. PamD (talk) 13:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education in Sandwell 

message: Why are here no infos about this unbelievable child abuse? - https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-hubs/sandwell/2017/08/22/6000-child-abuse-allegations-in-sandwell-in-five-years/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.60.230.237 (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child abuse 
Talk:Martin Ferris

message: i have removed a dead link, which claimed to be a citation that Ferris had denied being a member if the IRA army council. I find this very improbable because Sinn Féin members tend to be extremely precise in their use of language, saying something like 'that report is inaccurate' without contradicting the specific allegation. Given this, it is not up to Wikipedia to reinterpret a vague rebuttal as a precise claim, it would be better to include an exact verifiable quote.
Tzq99 (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jimmy Cricket

message: Can anyone find his birthdate? I can't find it anywhere. -sars 16:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * 
* 
Category:1985 British television series debuts
Category:1988 British television series endings
Category:1980s British television sketch shows
Category:British English-language television shows
Category:ITV comedy
Category:ITV sketch shows
Category:Television series by ITV Studios
Category:Television shows produced by Central Independent Television Crazyseiko (talk) 19:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't copy the content of non-notable redirected article to the talk page of the target. We mention this show in the article. If you feel there is additional content from that redirected article that should be included then source it and add it. Meters (talk) 06:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Peppermint Grove, Western Australia

message: An estate, in its English and Australian meaning, entails a working agricultural entity. Country houses in the British isles and, to a lesser extent, in Australia (in Scone, for example), are estates in the truest sense of the word. A house with a swimming pool and a tennis court attached is an "estate" only to nouveau riche American estate agents. It is sad that their Australian peers have adopted the term. No decent estate agent in England could have got away with it!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.82.129.66 (talk) 16:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of dams and reservoirs of the Susquehanna River

message: Having spent all my summers on the river in the figurative shadow of the Conowingo Dam, the dams on the Susquehanna and their interaction with the environment and humans are of interest to me and, I've found from my research, to others.  Initially I needed a place to start my list of dams, but realised many of the enviromental details that I've added to Conowingo Dam apply to all the dams, so this wouldn't be a simple "list of".  More like the purpose of Iowa class is to USS Missouri (BB-63).  I also plan on writing up the rest of the lower Susquehanna dams on their own.  And I'll probably throw together one of those useful/annoying nav boxes some day.
When this article gets going, some of the non bridge dams might want to come out of List of crossings of the Susquehanna River.  This article also needs to be linked into Susquehanna River at some point, probably in a renamed Bridges section.
I'd like to add a History section to this some day, but don't have enough for even a  at this point.  Maybe after researching more of the individual dams.--J Clear 16:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Susquehanna Dams "project"
Talk:Milneburg, New Orleans

message: I've put the article at "Milneburg". Although "Milneberg" is a more common spelling according to Google, "burg" seems to be the city's official designation spelling. And of course "Milne" rather than "Milen" from Alexander Milne. I've put redirects from the 3 common spelling variations. -- Infrogmation 16:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The historic Milneburg on the lakefront and the current City Planning Commission neighborhood designation really don't seem to have any overlap-- the old Milneburg was outside of the boundaries of the current CPC designation. I propose spliting the article. Let's leave the CPC neighborhood at the current title, and split the historic lakefront town to "Milneburg", with hatnotes at the top of both articles disambiguating.  Any objections or counterproposals? -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article split
Template talk:Public universities in Michigan

message: I'm going to change the labels to be more formal, such as "Eastern" -> "Eastern Michigan", "Lake State" -> "Lake Superior State".  Essentially I think the label should be the complete school's name, minus "University".  This keeps each label consistent also.  The only exception is UM.  I don't think it sounds right to just call it "Michigan - Flint", etc.  --X96lee15 16:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formality of Names
Category talk:Prince Edward Island provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in Prince Edward Island.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category
Category talk:Quebec provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in Quebec.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category
Category talk:Saskatchewan provincial highways

message: As per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Man-made objects, by country categories of such things are named "in country".  I believe the same convention should be applied to Provinces of Canada and therefore, the sub-categories of Provincial highways in Canada should be renamed in the style Provincial highways in <province>, and this category should be renamed Provincial highways in Saskatchewan.  RayGates 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to rename this category
Talk:Scotty Beckett

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Regarding the question of Beckett's death:
:See (among others): TV.com
:: Monkey on My Back
:: A Beckett Tragedy
:::Michael David 16:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The fifth and sixth links under "External Links" are dead. Also, the third link contains no information! Billcito (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead links 

message: That last paragraph is taken verbatim from Leonard Maltin's Our Gang book.  Plagiarism at its finest Maravelous (talk) 22:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I was just gonna say the same thing.  Found this on another site: "According to Maltin and Bann's book, "The last 10 years of his life were filled with unpleasant stories of divorce, violence, drugs and arrests.""  Someone with a little more time do something about this? Pretty unacceptable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.215.104 (talk) 04:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Paragraph
Talk:List of places in Northumberland

message: There is a listing at the disambiguation page Earle of a placename Earle, Northumberland.  Considering it does not merit a listing here, I am tempted to remove it from the disambiguation page.  Your input would be appreciated. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Earle, Northumberland

message: List of places in Cumbria includes Alston Line Newcastle and Carlisle Railway Brampton Railway- which interpretation is right?--ClemRutter (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway lines- yes or no 

message: I live in Duston Village in Northamptonshire near the town of Northampton.
I have lived in Northumberland and cannot recall a place named Duston, there.
And am too unsure of my computer skills to do anything more than suggest, if possible, could someone look into this matter?
Thank you.
86.22.151.10 (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to browbeat you with this hasty reply before your ink was hardly dry but yes, I'll buy that. I also don't believe there is a Duston, Northumberland. There is a Dunstan (near Embleton) and I'm guessing that that was what was meant and have changed it accordingly. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or suburb of Duston in Northumberland?
Talk:The Sons of the Desert

message: I think & mean that the name is "SotD", i.e without the "The". -DePiep 16:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not "The" 

message: I removed some of the most gushing language and tightened it up a bit. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 20:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Ny-Ålesund Airport, Hamnerabben

message: I've found some diverging information about this airport, including an alternative name and also a different ICAO code, which I won't add because the source isn't too trustworthy and many sources confirm the current ICAO code. 
The airport data is at least a little inaccurate. Since the only source cited doesn't contain this kind of information, I will replace the old information with the one given by my sources.
D4RK-L3G10N (talk) 03:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuricies of Airport Data 
Talk:Guildford, Western Australia

message: Lew Whiteman info should be in Whiteman Park - hardly relevant here!  If any one family who had an old house in Guildford (whether the first or first hundred) gets mentioned here, lets get ready for an oversize article about 2 pages length if we are to do them all justice!!    :)  SatuSuro 16:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As Alfreds Kitchen is a landmark in Guildford, I suggest that it merged into this article with information and section on landmarks be created. Gnangarra 06:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Ceratophyllum

message: Are Ceratophyllum really in Class Magnoliopsida?  NaySay 16:58, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This article was written like Ceratophyllum, i.e. a cosmopolitan genus, with a very particular taxonomical situation (so with a unique morphology, fisiology...) and a great ecological importance, was only noticeable as an aquarium plant. Please, improve it, de.wikipedia, es.wikipedia, pt.wikipedia and, (possibly!) vi.wikipedia can be used as sources. Aelwyn 18:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information 

message: Whether snails may or may not carry Schistosomiasis (Bilharzia) seems irrelevant to this descriptive article about Ceratophyllum 
77.203.150.107 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant information