lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1996 NCAA Division I men's ice hockey tournament

message: Not sure exactly what it is (I thought it was the ^ or ** characters at first), but something is making the FF bracket look weird.  Maybe I'll look at it later, but I thought I'd bring it up here.  X96lee15 17:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FF bracket is messed up 
Talk:A Lesson in Murder

message: It would be nice to adapt the infobox to display the setting (ie date) of each Foyle's War episode, but I don't know how to do this.  Gwinva 17:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I have completed the summary, and would appreciate comments.  It is too long?  The programme is 90-odd minutes long, with a complicated plot, so it would be hard to condense if it is still to make sense.  Would it be better to do something in a different style, less plot-fact driven, and capturing more of the feel, relationships etc?  Anyway, at least there's something to work from now.  Gwinva 13:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: plot summary
Talk:Breakables

message: Should this even be here? All parts of the drumset are breakable. The stands are called hard ware because they are the least breakable.  That I understand. The bass drum to many is the most distinguishable from one drummer's touch to the next and is very breakable. I believe all pieces are equal and should be regarded in this manner, otherwise we lose the whole kit and over-individualize each piece. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.185.197.117 (talk • contribs) 
:It's the standard term, see wikt:breakable, and a very useful one, albeit poorly defined; The Wiktionary definition is inadequate on several grounds but I'm not quite sure how to fix it. Your point may be logical and I wish you well in promoting it in the appropriate forums, but we do not try to fix English usage here. Andrewa (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The term ''breakable''
Talk:List of Dacian kings

message: re edit by 62.128.20.13 - "a little part of Dacia became" etc. While the best form would probably be "part of Dacia" etc., the meaning here is that there were no further kings to add to the list. For the purpose of this article, the current form is likely the best. There is an independent article on Dacian history. merryXIV 17:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dacia became a province of the Roman Empire"
Talk:Plant cuticle

message: According to the disambiguation page for Cuticle, [here it is]
Cuticle, or cuticula (latin for "covering"), may refer to:
*Plant cuticle, or cuticula, a waxy polymeric film covering all aerial plant surfaces 
*Cuticle (nail), in human anatomy, the fold of skin at the proximal end of the nail 
*Cuticula (invertebrate), the outside of the epidermis of many invertebrates 
*Enamel cuticle, a covering of the crown of a newly erupted tooth, quickly destroyed by chewing 
*Cuticle (hair), or cuticula pili, a layer of overlapping cells that surround the hair cortex and lock the hair shaft in its follicle
This article on Plant cuticle looks comprehensive and succint. Do you think it makes sense to merge it into the article Cuticle as a subtopic? SueHay 17:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm withdrawing the merge suggestion. --SueHay 02:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Cuticle article
Talk:Molla Mallory

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 11:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Regardless of her level of fame when she arrived in the US, her nationality is pretty important information. Did she cancel her Norwegian Citizenship and take an American one instead? If so, when did she do this? The article claims she arrived in the US in 1915, and won US Open the same year, certainly she was still Norwegian (and not yet American) at the time. Lejman (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  American/Norwegian
Talk:Jerome, 2nd Count de Salis

message: There are too many pictures in this article, so it is too overcrowded, messy and confused. Please consider to remove these pcitures, which are unnecessary and have to do with the contents only remotely. ~~ Phoe talk 17:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Too true confusing to read as things are all over the place. The License images could reasonably be replaced with a link to the LG  which also has the advantage that it is easy to read. Such warrants have now been almost entirely revoked but that is not really for this article. Alci12 18:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: Apart from there being too many images, there are far too many asides. In trying to make the very opening more like a normal Wikipedia biog I found myself unable to see the wood for the trees in the article. He was an FRS—but why? He was some kind of diplomat—but how important? I think some severe pruning will be needed if we are are to bring out how and why he is interesting. —Ian Spackman 13:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you want to hear some lengthy asides, you should come to a family meeting. Marc xD--62.31.76.158 (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've just tried to edit this article, but it's actually un-editable. I wonder if this count is notable at all and if something happened in his life that made it significant. - Probably the article should be deletet.--Kojozone (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much context, for once! 

message: The entire article smacks of WP:COIN and is almost certainly the product of an amateur genealogist's straining to convince self and others of some remote/fantasized kinship to "nobility". An example of the consequent exaggeration is the claim that continental titles which descended to male-line descendants of the original grantee, including females, were authorised for use in Britain. They weren't. Masculine primogeniture was imposed. I'm editing out the false allegation. FactStraight (talk) 04:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Right to use title in UK

message: As Wikipedia is no picture gallery, I removed most of the images. Also, there is no need to have two or more images of the same person or all pages of the same letter. I think the article is much more readable now.--Kojozone (talk) 09:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up
Talk:Violin Concerto (Schumann)

message: We have a flag saying the neutrality of this article is disputed and to see the discussion on the Talk Page. There is no discussion on the Talk Page; in fact there hasn't been a talk page until now. Would those who dispute the neutrality like to cite those statements they consider POV?Cenedi 17:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On adding some material to this page I discover that the tag mentioned above by User:Cenedi and removed, justifiably, has somehow reappeared. (28 Sept 2007). I have added a reference which provides a definite printed source for the material, and the article now also links to a slightly larger statement on the Georg Kulenkampff page than previously existed, and to many other pages via wikilinks. The article is therefore thoroughly wikified and I have removed the tone tag again. It would be helpful to have another reference if one is available. Kretzsch 10:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The third movement is entiteld: "Lebfhaft, doch NICHT schnell": lively, but not fast.
That many soloists tend to play it really fast (and then complain about its being unplayable), is another story.--Roazhon2 (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  traditional three-movement form, fast-slow-fast ??
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-06-27/Article blocking

message: I think that many may depart (or may stop value addition)  if our systems continue to give respect to vandals and such elements. I feel that formal or informal groups have evolved withing wikipedia and working perhpas in tandem to marginalize other editors. However, I am not sure of myself and it may be just a feeling, and not a reality. --Bhadani 17:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Cornelius Kortright

message: If you have any questions about this page please let me know. Woodsstock 17:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following text was put under the John Cornell Chads page in the section relating to Cornelius Kortright: "[he] was a man who was related to the late Queen Elizibeth. he was in fact as some would call it gay but that didnt stop him from achieving his goals. he was married with three children to his wife Helga Potaski".  No idea if it is true or not, but it is not sourced, so didn't feel it appropriate to include it here. Spelling error relating to "Elizabeth", and the fact that Queen Elizabeth the first had died nearly 300 years before he lived makes me pretty comfortable that it is not accurate. --Legis (talk - contribs) 18:27, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Discussion
Talk:Richard Hetherington

message: If you have any questions about this page please let me know. Woodsstock 17:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Discussion

message: Richard Hetherington b Aug. 21 1799 m Nov 15 1821 to Mary Grearson b Aug
1799 d Jan 18 1829
had 2 sons
James G. Hetherington of Johnston,Queens Co. N.B.
John Hetherington of Chipman Parish Queens Co.
Richard then married:
Edith Thorne b March 31 1810
They had 10 children 6 boys and 4 girls
Thomas, Isaac, Joseph & Richard are all I have.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 56.0.143.25 (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Which history book would write "are all I have"? What you're quoting is apparently from http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/HETHERINGTON/2000-02/0950414498. Cite an actual history book, or stop removing the fact tags. 87.137.122.207 (talk) 16:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the history books
Talk:Renáta Tomanová

message: A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here.  Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page.  After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions.  Thank you.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion concerning this article
Talk:Scottish variable rate

message: "the power to vary income tax by +/- 3p in every pound" - just the basic rate, or the higher rate too? And what happens if Scotland has (eg) a 23p basic rate, with the rest of the UK at 20p, then the UK Chancellor decides to cut it to 19p. Would Scotland be forced to come down to 22p to keep the 3p max differential? 86.143.54.72 (talk) 00:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifications please 

message: The article talks about failure to use the tax varying power but makes no mention of the costs associated with collection which Customs and Revenue would charge for collection. Costs that would outweigh the amount collected by a small change in tax.
It also goes on to talk about a 'scandal' without reference to the wider facts, related to that mentioned above, in that the Scottish Government would have been required to pay C&R in advance for modifications to their systems that would allow the tax to be levied.  http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/Finance/scottishvariablerate  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.75.4.251 (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute
Talk:Sandra Reynolds

message: These are better references than the current ones, though they still don't source much...:
* http://www.usta.com/presentations/USTAYearBook/63.pdf
* http://www.usta.com/presentations/USTAYearBook/25.pdf
* http://www.usta.com/presentations/USTAYearBook/64.pdf Valrith 05:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then, why don't you add the references to the article?  In my opinion, the article is already sufficiently sourced, and I am not the only editor with that opinion.  Tennis expert 03:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm looking for better references, since it appears no one else will. Valrith 00:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better references
Talk:Sarah Palfrey Cooke

message: According to this link, she appeared as a "special guest" in the August 29 1948 episode of a TV series called Swing Into Sports. 121.214.112.230 (talk) 09:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this worth noting?
Talk:Afternoon, a story

message: One can point to many progenitors before afternoon, including the much better known Crowther and Woods _adventure_ and the Swarthmore College DUNGE, not to mention toys and games in BASIC, PLATO, and other systems.  But afternoon is clearly a different beast, and the notability of Elfland Catacombs needs to be better argued.  It is not cited, for example, in any of the major monographs -- Landow's HYPERTEXT 3.0, Joyce OF TWO MINDS, Douglas END OF BOOKS, Gaggi FROM TEXT TO HYPERTEXT, Aarseth CYBERTEXT, Nelson LITERARY MACHINES.  I think it has never been cited in the ACM Hypertext Conference (1987-present).  Tellingly, it was not reviewed in Coover's famous NY Times reviews, which tried to review every published hypertext fiction . MarkBernstein 18:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no objection for 6 months, I've removed the Elfland Catacombs reference.  Suggestion: a page on early hypertext or early interactive fiction could discuss all these early cyberliterary works.MarkBernstein 15:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: refactor old topic and move
Talk:Tarata bombing

message: Was this really the deadliest Shining Path attack to date? With all due respect, 24 dead sounds like the toll of a rather garden-variety highland massacre at the hands of the Shining Path (or the army). Of course, Tarata was felt much more by the political classes - it was a bombing (entirely against civilians) in a well-to-do commercial/residential district. Feketekave (talk) 00:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to deadliest bombing to be more specific, but I'm not sure that's true. The Lucanamarca massacre was a much more deadly Shining Path attack against civilians. Of course the victims were dark skinned and didn't live in Lima, which, unfortunately, means that they didn't matter in the minds of many. --71.163.67.145 (talk) 01:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says "according to specialists,[4] it was the first time in the course of the civil war that "traditional" Lima society experienced the conflict. It was the first time that a terrorist act was carried out against a large-scale civilian target and the first direct attack on a city center." I'm not sure that such specialists are correct, and the fact that the citation is a broken URL doesn't help. I think you could easily argue that most of Lima had "experienced" the conflict that was raging around them for twelve years by the time the Tarata bombing took place, and it's not clear what "traditional" society is (I'm guessing that it means "rich"). Both the Shining Path and the Peruvian military had been targeting civilians for a very long time before this bombing occurred, and I'm not even sure that it was the first attack on a city center. For example, the Palacio de Gobierno had been attacked by the Shining Path, and Tarata was part of a bombing campaign in Miraflores. Also, what counts as a city? I'm sure the city of Ayacucho experienced terrorism before this particular bombing in Miraflores. --71.163.67.145 (talk) 01:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims in article
Talk:Titu Cusi

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 03:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: It appears as if the image used for this page was deleted in Wikimedia Commons, but it looks like its still on this page. It's a nice drawing, but it's just a drawing! Can we get this removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.145.10.139 (talk) 19:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I went ahead and edited the article to remove the handmade illustration as it was removed from Wikimedia Commons due to copyright violation and another user requested its removal from the article in 2014. Even if the image didn't violate copyright, I feel it fails to meet encyclopedic standards. Lgnlint (talk) 08:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Article Image 

message: As far as this is the only Sapa Inca who left written documents, and since this Inca wrote his own name as <Diego de Castro Titu Cussi Yupangui>, it may be worth considering writing it as such here. On top of that, such spelling encodes that in the Quechua speech of his his name was pronounced with a [g] sound instead of a [k] one. Nawabaonbake (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name: Yupangui
Talk:The Farm (Canada)

message: User:Pekayer11, as you offered no hint in your revert summary, if you insist that information on the the Speakers of the House of Commons be included here, could you perhaps offer your rationale for why such information should be in an article about a property, instead of at Speaker of the Canadian House of Commons? It would seem to me that when any rational reader sees that The Farm became the official residence of the speaker in 1955, they can deduce that those on this list after 1955 lived at The Farm. Awaiting your input, --Miesianiacal (talk) 13:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on Speakers
Talk:Samul nori

message: At this point, the article is about the genre and the actual original ensemble (in fact, it would have to be, as the term was coined by Kim Duk Soo in reference to his ensemble). Thus SamulNori links are quite relevant.  Badagnani 07:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SamulNori links 

message: The section at the bottom titled "Instrumental" just lists some things and should be either deleted or expanded by its creator or someone who probably knows his intention. AnUnnamedUser 03:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumental section 

message: As an IP user I can't rename the page, but this page should probably be renamed to Samulnori or SamulNori per WP:COMMONNAME. See this ngram for why. The SamulNori spelling is hairy because I think the original band that created the genre uses this spelling, and the genre in general may or may not, need to research that. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be renamed
Talk:Věra Suková

message: A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here.  Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page.  After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions.  Thank you.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion concerning this article
Talk:East Hagbourne

message: i think that the redirect should be removed. i think that if they fail to type in Hagbourne with a capital "H", then Wikipedia will surely give them a list of articles that it could be.--Halowithhorns89 18:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I was in east Eastbourne and used the nearby button and apparently it's 250 metres away?
WikipediaUserCalledChris (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Ready or Not (Fugees song)

message: this song is composed by JACKSON FIVE   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.206.101.115 (talk) 16:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Enya? Was this not first released by the Delphonics?
Hi, I added a citation about Obama but it's not showing up. Perhaps it's ill-formed. Can someone help me out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.234.1.207 (talk) 07:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: "Ready or Not" doesn't contain any elements of the song "Ready Or Not, Here I Come" by the Delfonics — it only uses the chorus as a basis for its own chorus. The song samples "Boadicea" by Enya. As with nearly all of the Fugees hits, "Fu-gee-la" included, the song utilizes a chorus and a background from already existing music. --Mrlopez2681 (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction on samples
Talk:2006 People's Liberation Army Air Force KJ-200 crash

message: The Article on the Shaanxi Y-8 claims that the accident June 3 2006 accident in China was a KJ-200 AWACS, based on the Y-8 airframe.  The IL-76 article claims the same accident was a IL-76 based KJ-2000.  It cannot be both.Hudicourt 16:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Japanese wikipedia article points out the possiblity that it was not a known type of KJ-200 AWACS, but one with a new experimental type of rotor-dome radar that crashed. It would have looked like a larger version of E-2C.--Revth 08:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Serbian Genocide

message: Ive recreated this article after it strangly returned itself to its old statique to the Nazi concentration camp Jasenovac. 
I think we might need a separate article for the list for Serb-committed atrocities and for Serb war criminals.
:The page oddly returned itself to a redirect aagin. Luckly, I wrote the text in Word and saved it, so I'm reposting it.
:::It's back again. I think there's a bug, Ill try to solve it later when I return the text. Maybe admins can help? --CroDome 00:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bloomington High School South

message: ADD PICTURES!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobert300 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I edited the statement of "well known Hoosiers" because Rex never was a Hoosier, but a Florida Gator. - User:lakersnbulls91
:Are you joking? Hoosier as a resident of Indiana, not a member of the sports teams. Charles 04:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rex Grossman 

message: souths basketball team won the indiana state championship! they played against Fort Wayne.--Bobert300 (talk) 02:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  basketball team 

message: For many years Bloomington had only one high school except for the University school, I believe, and it would be incorrect to consider someone like Hoagy Carmichael to be a South alum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.202.206 (talk) 15:39, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  alumni 
Talk:Bruno Bräuer

message: How does this page require clean up and how should it be improved. Is the fault in styl or spellingCheese cake is great 16:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean up 
Talk:Paper hanger (Mundelein's speech)

message: The article's tone seems slightly POV in favor of Hitler. Perhaps this was an overzealous attempt to prevent POV in the other direction, but regardless this is a problem and someone with more knowledge on this speech should rewrite the article. --Israelite9191 18:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The point was, what qualifications did he have to rule a country? -- AnonMoos (talk) 22:41, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

text: No, I have to agree with the earlier commenter, that it's definitely defensive of Der Fuehrer. That he was a "published author" isn't much of an accolade, given that Mein Kampf is more a rant than any sort of honest intellectual work. And sure, he was a "watercolorist." So is my sister; her pieces are very nice. I doubt they would offset her desire for racial cleansing and world conquest, though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpolhemus (talk • contribs) 15:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Babel (soundtrack)

message: not Academy Award-nominated, hence the statement "The album won the Academy Award for Best Original Score". It's also not the "album" that won Best Original Score, but the score. --Lapadite77 (talk) 03:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy Award winning...