Template talk:Chechen wars

message: Hey Hanzo, I've made a couple of changes as you have probably already noticed. I've removed the Chechen coat of arms and replaced it with the Ichkerian flag (to make it more clear, as the Ichkerian key leaders are also represented by this flag) and I've added some names I believe should be listed. I hope yu agree since you appear to be the only one editing this template. Let me know. ForrestSjap 07:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear hanzo, it appears you are very touchy about this template. If you disagree with my edits, feel free to discuss them with me. I've already invited you to do so above, but don't undo them without explaining why. If you insist on keeping the coat of arms, whatever, I'll let you have your way, but the names I added are relevant to the conflict and you should not have removed them without giving a proper explanation.  Apart from your treasured coat of arms, I will restore my edits, next time you undo them, leave a message or the process will be repeated. ForrestSjap 08:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

text: At any rate I´m glad you've finally decided to discuss it with me on this page. Of course I do not want to list every single person involved in the conflict, only the relevant ones. The name of the section in question is 'key leaders', and whether you like it or not, Barayev and the likes of him have played a key role in the conflict. Anyway, I have left them out because you want to keep the list short, so let´s not argue about that. Supyan is relevant because he will succeed Umarov in the (not unlikely) case of the latter´s death (as opposed to Putin´s vice-president/prime-minister etc.). And the statement that Kadyrov has won the struggle for power is quite bold. Neither Kakiev nor Yamadayev are subordinate to Kadyrov and they even exert control over some territory. Although it does not come to violent confrontations frequently (occasionally they still clash), they are still forces to be reckoned with. ForrestSjap 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: You are stubborn and ignorant. I will not go into a revertwar with you so you can keep your template, do with it as you please. ForrestSjap 06:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He died retired and from non-war related causes (health). Most of the historical figures are dead now, you know? --HanzoHattori 16:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't sure if it was debated before or how those templates works, but we we marked every key player who died with a cross, I figure mind as well be consistent and mark his name with a cross. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The cross mark redirects to killed in action. Yeltin wasn't KIA, unless by "action" one undrestands "drinking". Also: he was retired for years. --HanzoHattori 14:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see your point. I'll revert myself now. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeltsin 

message: When exactly was the current pro-moscow flag of Chechnya installed? Akhmad Kadyrov is listed under the new flag, even though he might have died before it was introduced? (flag was introduced the same year as his death). - PietervHuis 01:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The flag was introduced by Akhmad Kadyrov.ForrestSjap (talk) 10:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate flags? 

message: Chechen volunteers and mercenaries have participated in numerous conflicts, this does not mean every one of them should be listed in the template dealing with the Chechen-Russian conflict. The Kodori crisis is primarily part of the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict, that is where it should be listed. ForrestSjap (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kodori crisis