lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deseret News

message: They can't both be (Salt Lake Tribune), but the claim is in both articles.  Someone needs to fix this. Moogle 03:35, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the DNews claims to be the oldest continually printed, whereas thhyghgjhhjgbhhytr56tu;/ikdflkeichdsjigtcoizahdks
e SLTrib claims to be just the oldest...there is a difference... JON, Conqueror of Men - (Talk to Me, Baby!) 04:13, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Which is Oldest?

message: The MormonTimes is basically just another "brand" that the Deseret Morning News (DMN) uses to earn advertising dollars for web-based content. A large portion of the site just recycles DMN content, with a little aggregation from other news sources & content providers. While there is some originally content, the site is not notable enough (even in LDS circles) to merit a standalone article separate from the DMN. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, Church News is much better established as a publication entity than Mormon Times. In fact, although it Church News is distributed as a section of the D-News, it has been (and, outside of Utah, still is) available by subscription separately from Deseret News. Rangergordon (talk) 07:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge MormonTimes to DMN

message: This section is currently listed as an anchor, however, this is no longer a feature of Deseret News. Proposed to remove this section and in place add a new section about Deseret's coverage of faith as a core topic, including mentions of the former Mormon Times. Trlm100 (talk) 20:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunday national edition (formerly Mormon Times) section
Talk:Welding

message: I just heard of rossette welds today, for the first time.  But cannot find anything on Wikipedia about these.
Found this on google search.  Rossette welds seem to be a thing.
If someone who knows about welding agrees, maybe we could/should have a REDIRECT at Rossette weld (currently a red link) to some paragraph on Wikipedia where they are described.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is basically just welding a tube inside of another tube. It's not like it's some different kind of welding; it can be done with MIG, TIG, stick, gas, etc... It's simply called that because the finished weld resembles a flower. I don't think we need to include every type of weld joint, because this is a general article on the subject and not an instruction manual. However, if you can find a source, and make it fit into the text, you're welcome to give it a shot. Zaereth (talk) 19:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rossette welds 

message: What you guys think about this images ? Is it the welding method shown in the pics are mentioned in Wiki articles ?
I asked because the welding methods could use other types of images
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatBPengineer (talk • contribs) 16:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: These look like decent images, but it's nothing that the article doesn't already show. Basically just images of a puddle-pusher pushing a puddle. Articles should not become repositories for random images, but rather images should show something significant and be relevant to the adjacent text. Sometimes that takes a little imagination when photographing. (What I usually do is read the text and think, how can I show this?) For example, what we could use is a close-up photo of the actual puddle taken through a welding lens. Or perhaps a photo of friction stir welding, or forge welding. I'll work on something like that when I get a chance. Zaereth (talk) 19:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: High quality images candidates ?
Talk:Luck of the Draw (album)

message: The album surpassed Nick Of Time's commercial success, as it sold 13xPlatinum RIAA as 2010 and tour of 180 dates 1991–1993. Sold 2million France and Italy along EU. Raitt's highest-selling album to date.
Would someone like to try and translate this into English?  Skinsmoke (talk) 12:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gobbledygook
Talk:Islands District

message: :File:Islands District Council logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Islands District Council logo.svg
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive (Poll: always use "U.S." and Oxford commas?)

message: Again, I'm not sure where to go to square this circle. Maybe replace the current policy with one requiring the writer to write clearly and unambiguously and noting that lists, in particular, can give rise to inadvertent ambiguity. Then contain a link to non-binding guidance that includes reference to how the Oxford comma disambiguates, along with other ways of disambiguating lists. jguk 20:00, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal 2

message: There was no consensus to change anything. There was not even a majority view that there is a problem with the style guide as it is now. 
:Poll results summary (support - opposition)
*Proposal 1: 17-17
*Proposal 2A: 15-16 
*Proposal 2B: 3-14
:Maurreen 05:34, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Though, as noted above, policy has to have consensus. Clearly the current policy does not have consensus. We need to square the circle. jguk 07:57, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No majority to change anything - so leave as is. Round circles are the best kind. -Vsmith 12:43, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Policy that enjoys consensus is the best kind. jguk 12:54, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but you didn't get any consensus, other than not deleting the existing policy. We therefore have no compelling reason to overturn policy that is based on widespread practice and the recommendations of nearly every authority that exists. Give it a rest. — Jeff Q 23:56, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text:  If there's this much contention over the proposals, I think that's evidence that a better proposal is needed that strives towards unanimity. The status quo should always be preserved when there is no consensus, because every change has a cost in updating articles and editors having to relearn the policy. Deco 00:07, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: In Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style--Draft Trim discussion archive, Jguk said: “Where we can, we should avoid using language that marks it out as being US/UK or as preferring one particular style of writing words over another.” He has made similar statements elsewhere.
I believe that his view in this regard is at least part of the basis for the poll above. If so, probably that is what should be discussed, at least initially to see if anyone shares his view. Maurreen 12:58, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: English versions
Talk:History of Antigua and Barbuda

message: Much of this article appears to be a long digression into the relative tiers of ethnic groups, which appears to be uncited original research.
Similarly, half the article is an analysis on the themes explored in the works of an author - which again appears to be uncited original research and not really an overview of the History of Antigua and Barbuda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.119.234 (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance of content

message: "Siboney" is a term specific to the preceramic people that inhabited western Cuba at the time of European contact.  This is not a general term for preceramic inhabitants of the Caribbean.  There is no conclusive evidence as to the origins of the preceramic inhabitants of the Lesser Antilles - it's generally thought that they migrated up from Trinidad/Venezuela; the fact that there are few early sites in the Windwards is taken by some as evidence that the northern Lesser Antilles were settled from the Greater Antilles, but this is not in any way conclusive evidence, and it certainly isn't enough to call these people "Siboney".  Guettarda 14:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preceramic inhabitants 

message: What is meant by "real"? Was Prince Klaas his original name and "Count" his slave name? It seems odd that his original name would be an english word if he was from Africa...--75.48.21.83 (talk) 08:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Who's real name was count" 

message: Most other former British colonies have their own pages, and it would make sense if British Antigua was their own too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CROIX (talk • contribs) 12:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The new page British Antigua and Barbuda is just a copy, without any improvement in references. In its current form, it's redundant, and I suggest redirecting it back to this article. MarioGom (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was being moved out of this article, it was never intended to be an improvement, it just did not need to be part of this article, as it’s topic is simply too important to be a part of this article. CROIX (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

text: User:MarioGom: Also, I apologize for a late response time, as I did not realize people would respond to a comment made almost a year ago. I am unaware of any policies regarding this, but using my common sense, I recommend starting a new conversation, instead of replying to one from months ago. CROIX (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Redirect There should not be duplicate articles with the same content like this. Reywas92Talk 14:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: It would make more sense if British rule (1632–1981) were its own page.
Talk:Louder Than Love

message: No talk page yet for an article this long? :o So here goes: "Because of some of the song lyrics the band faced various retail and distribution problems upon the album's release, including the addition of a Parental Advisory sticker on the album packaging." This strikes me as dubious. Did stores actually refuse to stock the album, even without the "Parental Advisory sticker"? At least this is what the wording suggests ("including," read there were various other problems).
Besides, if anything, a parental advisory sticker is a sales booster these days. In some styles it's practically a must-have. I mean, would you buy a gangster rap album without one? ;) Most record stores stock parental advisory stuff in large numbers. And Soundgarden didn't exactly appeal to an early to mid teenage demographic that liked to have their parents choose and buy their music for them anyway. So what's the point? Unless someone is coming up with reliable sources that prove the band really suffered sales problems due to that sticker, or the lyrics, I'm going to remove this. Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "In the late 1990s, an urban legend circulated on internet message boards which stated that Yamamoto, after writing the music, wrote some lyrics on the back side of McDonald's note. When Yamamoto gave the paper containing these lyrics to Cornell, Cornell looked at the wrong side of the sheet and believed McDonald's note was the lyrics to Yamamoto's song."
a simular story already circulated since the release of Louder than Love album. It was Cornell himself who told that story to the press. The only difference with his story is that he said he liked the note on the back more than the lyrics and choose to use the note instead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.241.112.63 (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Awake
Talk:Hortense McDuck

message: I think its sad so much has been written about Hortense Mcduck
Wrong. It's sad that not enough has been said. She probably went to Africa to work to relieve the suffering of the native peoples who suffered from the ruthless exploitation of her brother Scrooge. She will yet turn up. You'll see. Das Baz 15:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Context

message: ; Context
: 1 : the parts of a discourse that surround a word or passage and can throw light on its meaning
: 2 : the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs : ENVIRONMENT, SETTING.
Etymologically, it is derived: 
: from Middle English, weaving together of words, 
: from Latin contextus connection of words, coherence, 
: from Latin contexere to weave together, 
: from Latin com- together + texere to weave; 
: more at TECHNICAL.
The texere in turn is perhaps akin: 
: to Latin taxare to feel, estimate, censure, 
: to Latin tangere to touch, 
: to Greek technE art, craft, skill, 
: to Greek tektOn builder, carpenter, 
: to Sanskrit taksati he fashions, and furthermore, 
: to Korean tahta to touch, 
: to Korean ttahta to braid, plait.
Commonsensically and semantically if not etymologically, the notion of context rises from text and linguistics as the determinant of meaning rather than the meaning itself. It is ever-widening in nature as such. As such, it should be expanded up to the state of mind, and further to the state of affairs, if the meaning of a given text is unclear. So we have phenomenology and now contextualism, which is coherentism in another word, as coherence is the essential property of context. Note coherence in the above etymology, in contrast to context as a physical entity. 
My rallying point here is that this article should lay the foundation for either contextualism or coherentism, which is becoming the mainstream tenet of the world view! (In this regard, archeology and computer science may not be worth mentioning in the beginning. Archeology is not archaic, not to mention computer science.) --KYPark 09:20, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Common sense

message: I've expanded the opening statement a bit and added the connotation at the bottom of the list, that "context" can apply to the notion of community, whatever that may be and for what it is worth. • CQ • WP:CBTF • 18:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of ...
Talk:Lathyrus

message: Other Lathyrus pictures:
--nixie 07:11, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added them to the article -- sannse (talk) 12:51, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I put thm on the talk page, because they make a mess on the article page, they float all over the place--nixie 22:04, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: Humm - even with the table layout I used?  Does it look like a browser issue or one of space? -- sannse (talk) 22:32, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be a small monitor problem, I've moved both the meadow vetchling pics to an article about that species--nixie 00:30, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I suggest using this as an excuse to buy a bigger monitor ;) -- sannse (talk) 10:01, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Lenore (poem)

message: -Was this poem at all influenced by Gottfried August Bürger's poem 'Lenore'? If so, I think that would be well worth mentioning.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.237.106 (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's very unlikely, given that in Bürger's ballad it is Lenore's husband, rather than Lenore herself, who is dead.  DES (talk) 15:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

message: How can we be sure references to "Lenore" are actually from this poem and not "The Raven"? I think we should only include listings in that section that are -clearly- and -admittedly- influenced or inspired by the poem "Lenore" and NOT "The Raven." Speculation is not a good way to go. Thoughts? --Midnightdreary 01:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lenore in other media?
Talk:Gerry Cheevers

message: I just glanced over at Cheevers' official website, which seems to be devoted to flogging merchandise.  The bio given on the site, however, is taken from the Wikipedia article, not the other way around - there were two sections of text I'd written myself.  Just a FYI ...   Ravenswing  16:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI - Not really a copyvio 

message: Article should probably mention the Chixdiggit/Cheeky Monkey song. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 23:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song
Talk:Mount Liang

message: I moved it to the former from the latter based on google. --Jiang 08:39, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Mount Liang vs. Mount Liangshan

message: Calling it a "modern county" doesn't make any sense, while a "modern city" does make sense. Badagnani 16:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: County in China has been an administrative division since Qin Dynasty, more than 2000 years ago. The territory of modern Liangshan County is probably different from the ancient Liangshan County. Therefore I think that it's OK to say modern county. --Neo-Jay 04:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Liangshan County]]
Category talk:Mesopotamia

message: Categories Babylon, Assyria and Sumer should probably be merged, as most articles are in all three of them, and there is no clear condition how to separate them. dab 09:16, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Section

message: Note advising to categorize historical articles in :Category:Ancient Mesopotamia. Mesopotamia is an historic region by definition but somebody anyway created Ancient Mesopotamia to make sure.--Maxaxax (talk) 14:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Talk:Secondary storage

message: "Secondary storage" or, better "secondary memory" is not absolutely the same as "mass storage" or "data storage device". 
"Secondary memory/storage" simply implies that it is not primary - ie. that the CPU can not access it directly and that its content must be brought to "primary memory/storage" before it can be acted upon. It does not have to be "mass" storage (consider smart cards, floppy diskettes, etc.).
I agree, this article should be kept "as it is."  It is important to note the difference between "Secondary" and "Mass Storage"
: If the difference is so important, would you mind giving us a clue? Is there a significant difference between "secondary memory" and "mass storage? What do you think that difference is? From inspection of the (current) articles, a person might come to the conclusion that they are the same thing.
: Even if "mass storage" is merely one of several different categories of secondary storage, it still might be a good idea to describe both of them in one article. (Similar to the way shadow ram doesn't have its own seperate article, but is described in the RAM article). If the distinction can be completely described in one paragraph, perhaps it would be better to merge all the information (including that one paragraph) into one article, rather than (the current situation) pretty much the same information being poorly duplicated across 2 articles, or (slightly better) most of the information concentrated in one article, but the other article becoming a one-paragraph stub. --75.37.227.177 03:49, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This should stay - should not be moved
Talk:Northern shoveler

message: Sorry, but the pale blue in the wings isn't the speculum, which is green.
It is what we Germans call "Armdecken", i.e. the contour feathers
covering the part of the wing derived from the arm.
--213.6.97.225 09:52, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified further and added the female's wing. jimfbleak 16:43, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wing

message: I removed a gallery and several images added recently by . The images are good, but excessive in number,  I thought. I moved them into the Commons gallery. Perhaps someone can review them? Some species have galleries, and I don't necessarily object to them. But, I think some balance is needed between the text and the images so the reader is not overwhelmed. Walter Siegmund (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image gallery

message: I'd like to know the basis for the distribution map, having regularly seen this species in downtown Reykjavík at the Tjörnin for the past 30 years I've been there. Current map seems to indicate the species only on the eastern side of Iceland which is plainly wrong. --Stalfur (talk) 02:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution
Talk:Ashley Gorge

message: Page started life as Ashley gorge. Then had a discussion; this was the most relevant page of its history (which made a bit more sense in original layout):
202.0.43.227 (Talk | contribs)
 Revision as of 22:29, 6 Nov 2004
Grutness (Talk | contribs) 
 
Line 1: Line 1: 
Gorge should be capital letter as it is a proper noun - don't know if it is possible to change this, or a new page needs to be created?  Gorge should be capital letter as it is a proper noun - don't know if it is possible to change this, or a new page needs to be created? 
  +  
  + move and rename - like this! Grutness 
We both agreed with 202.0.43.227. I'll leave Grutness to explain if necessary. Give him a few more months and he can be a sysop so's he can fix this sort of thing himself and nobody will notice. Robin Patterson 10:32, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled