lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dear enemy recognition

message: Page created. TeamZissou 22:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

message: An anonymous user added the following to this article: 
I replied to the this user's IP talk page with the following justification for reverting the edits:
I've been meaning to build this article for some time and have assembled a few dozen studies on animals from insects to birds to fish to reptiles to humans demonstrating that the phenomenon is more than merely a hypothesis. It is in fact simply "a situation" and saying as such doesn't imply that it is the only situation. I'm reverting your edits because they were placed poorly into the article and your references aren't properly formated (which isn't hard, since CBE, MLA, Chicago, Havard, APA, etc. are all used on Wikipedia with little argument). I appreciate the information, and do agree that it should be included in the article -- perhaps an entire section devoted to examples where DER doesn't occur. Just as other demonstrable yet non-universal concepts such as Allen's, Bergmann's, and Gloger's rules are still taught in ecology courses, so, too, is DER. Please create a new section composed as you would an informative paper instead of a list, and incorporate a proper referencing format. If you would like to help expanding this article and would be willing to provide me with your email address, I could forward a large compressed file of pdf's of the published studies and reviews I've collected thus far. Thanks, and I urge you to consider creating a regular user account to enhance cooperation on future projects. TeamZissou (talk) 10:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A non-universal concept

message: No offense but your description does not let me know really anything about what this topic is. I stumbled into here from animal communication and I still have no idea what Dear enemy recognition is. Could you please try explaining the topic again, and be as if you're explaining to someone who doesn't already know the full context of what you're talking about. 210.49.193.240 (talk) 03:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more context 

message: Surely this page should be merged into Dear enemy effect.__DrChrissy (talk) 19:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Koji Nakanishi

message: Most of this article appears to be a word-for-word copy of this. --Evil1987 22:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected copyright infringement 

message: Nakanishi helped to ID details of the structure of Periplanone B in 1979 (with W. C. Still). The general structure was known but the 1979 work pinned down the stereochemistry. Add info to the paragraph "Koji Nakanishi has determined the structures of over 200 biologically active animal and plant natural products ..."? AdderUser (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Periplanone B to pioneering accomplishments section? 
Talk:Wat Chedi Luang

message: The opening text of this article says: 
The current temple grounds originally was made up of three temples - Wat Chedi Luang, Wat Ho Tham and Wat Sukmin.
After the cremation of Chan Kusalo, the abbot of Wat Chedi Luang,  I bought a book about the cremation, containing also information about Wat Chedi Luang, more specific it contained a map dating from 1893. This map mentiones Wat Ho Tham but not Wat Sukmin. In total 4 Wats are mentioned as surrounding Wat Chedi Luang: วิหาร.วัดสบฝาง - wí-hăn • wát sòp făng, วิหาร.วัดหอธรรม - wí-hăn • wát hŏ tham, วิหาร.วัดสบชมิ้น - wí-hăn • wát sòp chá-mín and วิหาร.วัดพันเตา - wí-hăn • wát phan tao.
This makes me conclude that there were originally five temples on the temple grounds, not three.
In Exploring Chiang Mai, City, Valley & Mountains by Oliver Hargreave it says about Wat Phan Tao that is was originally part of Wat Chedi Luang, but is now a temple on its own. This supports the information on the 1893 map.
Since I'm living in Chiang Mai 6 months a year I will have the opportunity to find more information at Wat Chedi Luang.
FredTC (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 temples or 5 temples?
Talk:Safavid order

message: Did the old Safaviya have connections with today's Bektashi Order? --Komitsuki (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Nuqtawiyyah properly!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.246.209.213 (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to
Talk:Seven pillars of Ismailism

message: I came to this page from the article on Ismaili and was surprised that the 7 pillars of Ismaili are not listed.  Or rather, the word "Druze" in the list is confusing.  Is this list actually the list of the Ismaili? or only of the Druze, and the other 'branches' have different lists? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 04:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the 7 pillars of Ismaili and Mustaali the same as the 7 of Druze? 

message: I noticed that the introduction to this article does not make it clear what it is all about. Could someone with the relevant knowledge provide a summary in the introduction?Markoff-Chaney (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:Shia Muslims in the Arab world

message: there should be a color coded map showing which countries are mostly sunni and which ones are mostly shi'a. additionally there should be some way to indicate if the government of a given country is either sunni or shi'a. this would be very helpful for places like syria and bahrain where - i believe - the government and the majority of the people are not of the same sect of islam - ... 213.74.231.183 (talk) 10:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  map 

message: This article is weak. The main article, which encompasses this topic, is Shia Islam. Benefac (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this with "[[Shia Islam]]" 

message: Am I crazy or is Iran not mentioned anywhere in this whole article? ❦Cans48☙•[t/c] 16:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran?
Talk:Soaz (poetry)

message: A link pointing to a youtube.com channel added to the links section of article "soaz" was reverted by the bot whereas a similar link pointing to another youtube.com channel and titled "Soazkhwani by Syed Imon Rizvi" is permitted and exists for quite a long time. Why it is so? Sozkhwan (talk) 12:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of a link reverted by bot 
Talk:Andrew Roth

message: Is this the same Andrew Roth arrested during the Amerasia affair?  From Time magazine, 18th June, 1945: 
Navy Lieut. John Andrew Roth, 26, one time Amerasia researcher, recently in the Office of Naval Intelligence 
The name, age, and occupation are right.  Also Amerasia was associated with the Institute of Pacific Relations where Roth, the subject of this article, had worked, according to Who's Who.  If anybody has a source, let me know. - 17:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess he was: Tory ex-MP dons McCarthy's mantle to stalk a 'Commie' at Westminster - Crosbiesmith (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Amerasia'' affair

message: American, British, or both? Nietzsche 2 (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizenship
Talk:Thomas A. Romberg

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license 
*Article needs wikification to put it into Wikipedia style
*Basic biographical information required, including date and place of birth, education, precise dates for positions held etc
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded and references required
*Key publications list would be interesting
*References should be expanded, using non-affiliated sources, and preferably converted to inline format with reference list
*External link(s) present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 23:05, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Taqlid

message: I'm really quite disappointed with the way this article has gone - most of the recent edits have been for the purpose of pushing an extreme Sufu point of view.  It is a valid view in the sense that it can be sourced, but the Sufi movement is a minority movement within Sunni ISlam and to depict its views as the majority view is intellectually dishonest, and unfair to the readers who need objective information.  Every reader is free to form their own point of view (though some may simply reading without even taking a side).  It is not the choice of editors to decide what view is the "correct" view and then push that - this is a disservice to the readers and the site.  All views can be presented, but there needs to be some honesty - label the Sufi view for what it is, the Salafi view for what it is, and so forth. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Extremely biased
Talk:The Four Companions

message: This article lists a Shia faith according to the perception of Sunni's (the reference provided for this Shia faith is from a Sunni source). Please respond appropriately, else I will try to mould it according to Shia sources on this issue. Syed Fayyaz Abbas (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I've added citations, mostly from shi'i sources (books and al-islam.org).
Removing the tag that says the article is unreferenced, which is no longer the case. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 12:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of article tag: Unreferenced
Talk:Inmac

message: Inmac was a sizable public company that was trend-setting in its direct-marketing approach. I'd say that makes it notable.
-----------
I worked for Inmac in the UK, 1984-1991. As I understood it, I,N,M,A,C did not stand for anything but was a name dreamed up by a PR agency. It was deliberately neutral and meaningless and yet techie-sounding. 
The firm's culture was heavily influenced by the book "In Search of Excellence" by Peters and Waterman. Stratopastor (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Joseph Lapira

message: I have amended the edit to Joseph Lapira with reference to him being the first Irish international to play for Rangers. Apart from several Rangers players who played for Ireland national football team (IFA), Alex Stevenson also played for both Rangers and Ireland national football team (FAI) during the 1930s. Djln--Djln 21:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rangers 
File talk:Powertab.jpg

message: I don't think that using a screen shot of a copyrighted work is a bright idea.  What about using a screen shot of a piece that's in the public domain?
DeeKenn 23:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the screen shot to one of a score in the public domain DeeKenn 18:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enter Sandman?
Talk:Gilling East

message: How do the locals pronounce the village name? With a hard G or a soft J? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Local says that they use the hard G version. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Ansar (Islam)

message: I’ve made a minor edit but I’d still like to add why for transparency:
Ansar comes from the word Nasr, which means victory. Ansar are they who bring victory. In this case, the most literal translation for “Ansar Muhammad” is, “They who (help) bring victory to Muhammad.” Therefore it isn’t justice enough to just put “The helpers” as the only English translation, but rather they were more than just people who volunteered their support.
The Ansar were critical as they made up almost the entirety of his armies in early defensive battles and provided his believers safe haven when they had nowhere else to turn. Thus the name Ansar wasn’t simply given to them for their support, but for their critical and direct contributions to his (Muhammad peace be upon him)’s victories. JasonMoore (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word Ansar and it’s meaning in English
Talk:Hot standby

message: Phew! Can't catch your breath between pressing save and being nominated for deletion.
This is not a dictionary entry, though I appreciate the starting sentence is using the word term. I would suggest it is a concept of system design, most notably in computing. It is as notable a concept as Hot swap - and yes I know that policy page too ;)Spenny 23:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hanpu

message: 'From Mount Baektu, Hanpu, who was among the defeated participants, led a group of people into Manchuria in hopes of establishing a new kingdom to glorify Silla.
'     Georgezhao (talk) 03:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: may we delete this 'original research'?

message: I just deleted a note that cited: Wontack Hong, "How Did the Rulers of the Jin and Qing Dynasties Trace Their Ancestors? The Manchu Origins." This reference was added by an IP on April 4, 2011. Problem: I found no mention of this article on Google and on Wontack Hong's own website (http://www.wontackhong.com/homepage4/data/4002.pdf). I'm concluding that it doesn't exist. If someone finds the real article, please cite the whole reference here so that we can trace it and see what it really says. Thanks! Madalibi (talk) 01:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A non-existent source 

message: I rewrote the entire page in light of scholarly sources I had access to. Every single claim should now be referenced. There are no footnotes in the lede, but all the information contained in there is referenced in the body of the text. Let me know if I forgot anything! Madalibi (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote the whole thing 
Talk:Chidlow, Cheshire

message: #Article needs to be greatly expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 23:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Sonnet 115

message: Placing the tag on this article is utterly arbitrary and rather ridiculous. There are 154 Shakespeare sonnets. We are trying to create articles for each one, as any brief perusal of this article should have made obvious to any reader. See the template. Deleting this article would make nonsense of that project. Not one of the others - many of which have have been up for over a year - have ever had such tags stuck on them. When short articles on all the sonnets are completed then many will be expanded with commentary, as some already have been. Paul B 23:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be silly; they are all formatted in the same way, as part of a series of Shakespeare's sonnets. If you have a problem with the general titling raise it on the Shakespeare's sonnets page. There is no "original research". Each article doesn't need to say what a sonnet is anymore than each article on a novel has to explain what a novel is. Paul B 23:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So your sonnet articles don't need to obey WP:V and WP:NOR?  Corvus cornix 01:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not "my" articles. If you bother to check the others you will see they have been started by variety of editors, and the template was created by user:Adambiswanger1. As I said, there is no OR. You seem to be complaining that there are no references as yet. This is hardly unique on WP, and as I say, to delete this page would be irrational, arbitrary and make nonsense of the project as a whole. It is obvious from your comments above that you hadn't looked at the article properly, or even realised that it was part of a series that clearly states "Shakespeare's sonnets". Paul B 10:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: *http://books.google.com/books?output=html&q=Shakespeare+%22Sonnet+115%22+-inauthor:Shakespearelr=&sa=N
:Yes, thank you. Many references can be found, but creating start articles was the priority. Many articles on undeniably notable figures have no notes. Today, for example, I read the Carl Nielsen article. The question is not whether reference are desirable, but whether the article is a legitimate candidate for 'speedy deletion'. In time we can improve this, but ask yourself the question is Wikipedia better with this article or with a red link in the Shakespeare sonnets template? Paul B 21:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree. Would you consider commenting here? Addhoc 21:36, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Search for references
Talk:Red-cowled cardinal

message: The photo offered is one of the closely related species Paroaria coronata (Brazilian cardinal), which is crested, while P. dominicana is not. See the corresponding article in the Portuguese Wikipedia.Cerme (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dealt with. In the future, feel free to remove such photos. • Rabo³ • 03:29, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!Cerme (talk) 17:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong photo.
Talk:Wedding Bell Blues (film)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Office action

message: This page doesn't appear to be substantive enough to stand on its own. The patent bit could easily be incorporated into patent prosecution (if deemed appropriate or even necessary), and if there doesn't appear to be a need for a separate article for trademark prosecution, then the trademark bit could be a sentence or two added to Trademark#Establishing trademark rights. Either way, an office action is a small part of the process of prosecuting either a patent or a trademark and might not warrant its own article. CDills(talk) 04:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with a redirect.--Nowa (talk) 19:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is more that can be said about the formal parameters surrounding office actions (deadlines to issue and respond, second office actions, final office actions, appeals therefrom). bd2412 T 04:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Hot spare

message: Is this page really a stub? Looks pretty complete to me. 77.99.179.112 09:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: I added this as a different page. I have a view that a hot standby is not necessarily the same as a hot spare, but this may be being pedantic and the terms are certainly used interchangeably.
However, a hot standby is not necessarily a computer term, any system can have a hot standby - for example a generator may be kept running to ensure no power outages to a critical system. I'd be sure that your average nuclear power station has hot standby cooling systems. Spenny 23:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point. In which case, may I suggest you revisit Hot standby to make it less-computery and then link as appropriate to Hot spare. As it was, it was vastly duplicative (although I concede not 100%) ... richi 00:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going for the position that the difference is not notable enough and the two terms can be successfully embraced under a single article, so I am content with the re-direct. It can always be split again if it is deemed too exciting. :) Spenny 10:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good plan ... richi 13:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hot standby

message: IN the wikipedia, there's no entry for Cold Standby and Warm Standby.
Is there a reason for this omission? As far as I know, the Cold/Warm/Hot Standby are the 3 configuration options for nodes in a redundancy cluster.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.241.213.105 (talk) 18:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that probably the whole standby thing is one article and these concepts should be added to that article, with the specific phrases redirecting. That would suggest renaming this article and expanding it. Seem like an appropriate response? Spenny 22:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold standby and Warm standby?!
Talk:Yellow-breasted tit

message: This species was originally created by PolBot, creating articles out of the IUCN database.  However it seems that entry was deleted from Red List; they don't currently have a page for this species.  I have deleted the IUCN rating, but it is also worth noting that the IUCN is the sole source for the article.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 00:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN status
Talk:Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations

message: According to the following
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPartFrom=800&CFRPartTo=1299
--222.67.202.23 (talk) 07:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The topic needs to be updated 

message: Any history about CFR 21?  major changes to any sections?  additions/deletions?   Some more substance about the issues surrounding CFR 21 would be nice...  Anyone know any of this?   --98.70.53.58 (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I work at a lab and several folks on our QAU seem to know a thing or two about the history of it.  I'm checking with them to see if I can find anything, but if I haven't updated this article with something in a few weeks, its probably safe to say I couldn't get them on-board. Zell Faze (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  history?
Talk:Abdallah bin Bayyah

message: On a general read, this article seems to be somewhat biased against the man, what with labelling his teachings 'deviant' and all. I don't know what minority fisq is so I will leave it for someone else to edit BelalHaniffa (talk) 08:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Cosmic Variance (blog)

message: Hold on -- I've only just started working on this! Thorsett 00:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Do we need the other uses link?  What I mean is, would anyone come here (with blog written in the title) and be confused why the article isn't about cosmic variance the concept?  However, if we remove the link from the top, we should probably put it into the body, with a sentence like, "The name of the blog comes from the concept of cosmic variance, the idea that we are only able to observe one universe at one particular time, so it is difficult to make statistical statements about cosmology on the scale of the entire universe. Smmurphy(Talk) 03:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.  Done.  I've also made Cosmic Variance, where people might go looking either for the blog or for the concept, into a disambiguation page. -- SCZenz 12:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  other uses
Talk:Acoustic Guitar (magazine)

message: Here is another source I might've used but didn't get to. -MrFizyx 00:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic Guitar (magazine)|Nomination for deletion]]

message: User:David_Lusterman/sandbox
Copied to allow discussion and modification before incorporation to the main article.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit suggestion by [[User:David Lusterman]], founder of the magazine