Talk:Saint Mary's University (Halifax)

message: a significant amount of the contents of this article has been pulled from several st. mary's websites. The sources can be found by putting any segment of the text into google. -PullUpYourSocks 20:10, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright vio

message: Does the above category apply? --YUL89YYZ 19:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The school, while founded with affiliations to the Catholic Church, was not founded by the Jesuits. They were invited to teach at the school many years after it was founded. CMacMillan 01:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Roman Catholic universities and colleges in North America

message: :Image:SmuCrestMar.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SmuCrestMar.gif

message: Hello,
The glebe house link in the history part is not the correct one....
I'll try and get a picture of it and/or the plaque outside of it now...would it be needed?....i think it houses the library of the catholic church now? not entirely sure.Arkhan83 (talk) 07:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  glebe house 

message: :Image:SmuCrestMar.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SmuCrestMar.gif

message: There's something wrong with the formatting at the top of the page that's beyond my ability to fix . . . Awien (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: What is the rationale for listing the members of the Senate?  Most members are not noteworthy in any fashion (i.e. hardly any of them would qualify for their own wikipedia entries, I'd imagine).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.238.153 (talk) 00:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale For Listing Members of the Senate 

message: With the departure, from Halifax, of the Most Reverend Archbishop Terrence Pendergast, SJ, Saint Mary's University has cut it's last ties with the Roman Catholic Church. The positions of Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor have passed out of church hands. 
Dr. David F Sobey, Ret'd Chairman of Sobey's Inc., was installed as the university's Chancellor and University President Dr. J. Colin Dobbs named as Vice-Chancellor on May 23, 2008.  
--Northern Gentlemen (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New secular Chancellor at SMU 

message: I have found Masters of Management: Co-operatives and Credit Unions while new page patrolling. I think it might be a good idea to merge these two articles, even if it's in reverse order than suggested by the merger templates. If there is no objection in seven days, I'll go ahead and merge. --I dream of horses (T) @  03:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The MMCCU page (and Masters of Management: Co-operatives and Credit Unions) should remain a unique page with a link to the St. Mary's page. This is a bonafide masters program that is only taught at St. Mary's. It is the only English language accredited masters program for co-operative management. The SMU page does not cover the university's programs or the uniqueness of those programs. While some of the material has come from the web site, a lot of detail has come from a participant (me). It needs to be a stand alone page. Johnthecoopdude (talk) 03:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

text: I would further add that it should be stand-alone in the same sense the the Masters of Business Administration is a stand-alone page. It is housed at St. Mary's University, but theoretically other colleges and universities could develop a similar program (and there is some developmental work towards that at the University of Toronto and the University of Wisconsin-Madison). --Johnthecoopdude (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

text: *Comment But MMCCU is not an organization, it's a degree. I've added some reliable sources to the article that assert its notability. I agree that original research should be removed, but most of what's in the article can be confirmed here. Gobonobo T C 10:20, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment Notability criteria still apply, and I'd say the organisation page applies as well. As for your sources, how does a press release prove notability? Or a piece by a student on the course? Dougweller (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion 

message: Not affilated to the article: Any student or staff of this University reading that page?--Antemister (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Disclosure: I am an employee of Saint Mary's University. As such, I thought it better to request the change rather than do it myself.
I'm proposing the removal of the section on the "Rape chant controversy" on the grounds it is given undue weight in the article. This event happened nine years ago and was not an incident of longstanding significance. Controversies of this scale are not usually cited on other institutional websites.
Alqbeck (talk) 14:32, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As a former employee of Saint Mary's, directly involved in the changes implemented after the Rape Chant issue, I dispute the change and have rolled it back pending further discussion and feedback from neutral parties. The changes to Saint Mary's culture and policy were *substantial* as a result of this incident. Further, the issue was part of a widespread issue across Canada. Saint Mary's incident spurred change and recognition across the country. The "Declaration of Respect" and Santamarian ceremonies came into effect as a *direct* result of the incident. Lastly, completely wiping the incident from this page is simply vandalism - though given your discussion here, I will refrain from marking it as such. The incident was well-documented and cited, and still referenced in the local community. Other university pages' lack of content of any topic should not inform the content of this page. It is not a public relations or marketing tool like a view book.·¤:•.°windjade.☼°.¤: 03:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Not done:  for the reasons described above. That's not undue weight, and even if it was, that does not mean we remove the entire section. (I have no relationship to or prior opinions of this university.)  ℰmi1y⧼T·C⧽ 11:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to remove content

message: Since when would Age Quod Agis translate to "What you do, do well"? I only ever remember seeing the Latin (disclosure: former student), but it would be much closer to "Do what you do" or "Do what you want". Then again, age isn't even a Latin word, so I guess it's allowed??
Is this a translation provided by the University? CMacMillan (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin motto