lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kosher (disambiguation)

message: Article seems heavily biased towards con. Article is a discussion of arguments against kosher slaughter, rather than an impartial overview of said methods. No sources are provided for the "numerous studies" cited proving the inhumanity of kosher butchering.--Eion 18:48, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Eion is not a cow. JFW | T@lk 21:22, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moo--Eion 21:33, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Cows do not commit suicide. JFW | T@lk 22:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

message: It is proposed to move Kosher to Kosher (disambiguation), and then redirect the title "Kosher" to the article Kashrut, as the primary topic for that term.  Please comment below. --Russ (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I originally made the change to the current way because I got confused, since there were articles titled "Kashrut" and "Kosher foods," besides all the subarticles.Xyz7890 (talk) 20:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I wasn't maligning the original move, Xyz. It is a suprisingly complex situation (And a new situation) however I think having Kosher direct to Kashrut and then putting a disambiguation 'hat' on Kashrut would be a better way. Just my opinion and it could be (And often is, it seems) wrong Narson (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Probably, though, wouldn't that be a seperate move request? Sounds like an idea though Llama. Narson (talk) 21:44, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

text: This also struck me as a backward move.  It seems to me that as stated above, Wikipedia:Use English and Wikipedia:Common names dictate that Kashrut should redirect to Kosher and not vice-versa, and Kosher should have a disambiguation tag directing to Kosher (disambiguation).  Just my 2¢.  Wilhelm meis (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Both. Kosher means both something that conforms with Jewish dietry law, but also is commonly used to refer to the dietry law itself. It is a suprisingly complex series of moves. The more I think about it, the more I am sure something needs to be moved somewhere, but not quite sure which is right. Narson (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:List of Presidents Of Argentina

message: Not mentioned in the list:
* Juan E. Pedernera 
Term of Office: November 5, 1861 — December 12, 1861 
[dutch WIP]] 82.170.210.120 22:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mariano(t/c) 11:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete list
Talk:Adoration

message: There is additional info in an article at the Catholic encyclopedia : http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01151a.htm that can be integrated here if anyone is interested. It is public domain as well. --DanielCD 19:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be mentioned that in Catholicism, adoration is for God alone, while veneration is the praise of saints. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 21:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholicism

message: After a very brief lead, the article effectively begins with the sentence "In Eastern countries adoration has been performed in an attitude still more lowly." Still more lowly than what? HiLo48 (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still more lowly than what?
Talk:The Riddles (Harry Potter)

message: A suggestion has been made tbat since this article contains essentially the same material as [Tom Riddle Sr.]], the two should be merged.  There is nothing known about the Riddles which does not directly concern either Tom senior, or tom junior. Disccussion on the talk page for Tom senior. Sandpiper 14:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support for Merger, I fully agree that this stub should disappear and be merged, it is not neccessary and just a repetition of information.   Death Eater Dan    18:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Excelsior Rotterdam

message: Does anyone knows the lyrics of the 'Excelsiorlied'?
*From SC-Excelsior.nl:
 Ferme jongens, stoere knapen
 Ons lonkt het vrije voetbalveld
 Waar je vreugd en vrolijkheid kunt rapen
 En je door geen zorgen wordt gekweld
 Als het sein voor de strijd wordt gegeven
 Trouw zijn wij dan allemaal present
 Voor de club onze krachten te geven
 Ja, dan zijn we in ons element
 
 Wij gaan naar het terrein, naar ons Woudestein 
 Waar Excelsior vlag waait in de wind
 En wij vinden het fijn, als we daar maar zijn
 Want daar is een ieder goed gezind
 Daar heerst altijd weer een gezonde sfeer
 Daar is vreugd en nimmer klinkt gemor
 En met blijheid in het hart
 Strijden wij voor rood en zwart
 Voor de roem van ons Excelsior
 En met blijheid in het hart
 Strijden wij voor rood en zwart
 Voor de roem van ons Excelsior
 
 Ferme jongens, stoere knapen
 De sport eist kerels van stavast
 Duffe dromers, die maar staan te gapen
 Vormen iets dat bij ons spel niet past
 Wie zijn kracht energiek ons wil geven
 Wie een vent is, waar echt pit in zit
 Wie naar ’t hoogste steeds met ons wil streven
 Die is welkom als Excelsiorlid
Aecis 23:27, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Excelsiorlied

message: Hello, the logo that is used at this page is WRONG! Sportclub Excelsior is the amateur team. The logo of the prof team is with SBV in stand off sportclub. SBV stands for Foundation Professional Football. (Stichting betaald voetbal)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.123.223.237 (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: The redirect 2023–24 Excelsior Rotterdam season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Excelsior Rotterdam season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tamazheq language

message: ==Merge?==
The information of this article appears redundant with the much more thorough Tuareg languages; any objections to my wiping it and creating a redirect?
--Dvyost 19:19, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  --Dvyost 13:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kunwar Singh

message: The article says 1777-1857 ==> 80 years; however, it also says he fought at the age of 90 years. Which of these is correct? We may need credible sources as the person has died long before the advent of electronic media. --Gurubrahma 17:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age? 

message: April 26, 1858 ws his date of death.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slatersteven (talk • contribs) 23:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Died 

message: 'was the chief organizer of the fight against British' is there a source for this? As he is not regarded in most sources as particualy inportnat[[Slatersteven (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  leader 

message: Is this needs (and can it be sourced?, what RS say he was notable?), after all the Rani of Jhansi is not called a notable leader. All sounds very OR  and puffery to me.09:58, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable
Talk:John S. Reed

message: Is this the same John S. Reed who served as president of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway from 1967 to 1986?  slambo 19:23, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
:Finally found the answer.  The Santa Fe president was John Shedd Reed.  Slambo (Speak) 13:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railroad connection??? 

message: Is this the same John Reed who is now (2010) President of Mizuho Securities?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.152.17 (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Mizuho is G. Wilders Reed and not John S. Reed.Americasroof (talk) 17:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan Connection???
Talk:Holmes (surname)

message: *Support. – AxSkov (T) 09:29, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request move 

message: I've heard it quite a lot in Johnny Rocketfingers and now in Tony Hawk's American Wasteland and other places despicting this kind of slanguish talk. Calling everyone either punk or holmes... Dunno if this is relevant... 200.230.213.152 21:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alright, holmes... 

message: Needs a better one. Rich Farmbrough, 00:56 1 November 2007 (GMT).
:Have you considered Template:Compact ToC? Also it is in alpha order but I would have preferred logical. However, we can't have it both ways. If you know the first name you can find the article, but if you do not, the logical structure is much easier to use.Dave (talk) 00:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: TOC

message: Doctor Cyril Henry Holmes father was clement Holmes born Lancashire. C.H. Holmes was a forester, PhD in horticulture. Travelled advising on forestation. Did much to improve and regenerate forests globally. 2.24.247.40 (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Cyril Henry Holmes
Talk:Mazatec

message: The redirect Xi̱taꞌén has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Xi̱taꞌén]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Adelaide Crapsey

message: This really could use better references. - Jmabel | Talk 07:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Knowledge of Angels

message: I have reverted, to remove the non-fiction category, because Knowledge of Angels is fiction. CarolGray 20:18, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiction
Talk:Kaimingjie germ weapon attack

message: I tried to merge edits from the duplicate page Kaimingye germ Weapon Attack, to this one.  The move failed for some reason.  Could someone explain how we ended up with two articles with almost identical titles onthe same subject? --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:18, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge failed 

message: :Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:14, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Cleanup Archive 

message: The article refers several times to "phosphene" gas - I think "phosphine" is the correct spelling, but I'm happy to have others' input. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phosphine? 

message: PaintWoodSt (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation done
Talk:MindPlay

message: To me, this article seems to be advertising MindPlay, rather than being an Encyclopedia article on it. I've invited SpikeJones (who created this article) to explain his interest, here or on his talk page, before I edit it to conform to NPOV. --me_and 20:20, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: I removed the prod template as this article does represent a real product that has been covered in mainstream press (as cited in article, WIRED magazine and USAToday).  The format/text of the article may need to be addressed, as others have mentioned in earlier discussions - but that by itself is not a reason to PROD or Speedy Delete a page. SpikeJones (talk) 04:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the proposed deletion
Talk:Ružinov

message: There is no such a thing as an airport in Ruzniov, neither Zlate Piesky lake resort. Read the map for god's sake!
--dusoft 20:33, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I have read the map just to be sure. Both Zlate Piesky and the Airport are situated in Trnavka, which is part of Ruzinov. Fair enough for me... Sf222 12:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I strongly disagree and—as you are not the first disputing this—I have made every effort to determine whether I am right.
In Vajnory there is the sports Vajnory airport ("Letisko Vajnory") which, I think, is closed now. Maybe you meant that.
The MRS International Airport spans four districts: 
* Ruzinov, 
* Vrakuna (did you mistake Vajnory for Vrakuna?),
* Ivanka pri Dunaji (outside of Bratislava),
* Most pri Bratislave (outside of Bratislava).
By looking at the map, at least 60% of the airport lies in Ruzinov, including all the airport's buildings and other facilities. The other districts only host parts of the two runways. Unfortunately there is no good online map of Bratislava's districts…
One more objection can be raised against Ruzinov as the home of the airport. Ruzinov is further split into 3 parts: Ruzinov, Nivy and Trnavka. (Please note I am not saying that Bratislava II is split into Ruzinov, Vrakuna and Biskupice.) As it happens, those 60% of the airport lie in Trnavka. That, however, does not mean they don't lie in Ruzinov. Bratislava has 17 districts and Ruzinov (= Ruzinov + Nivy + Trnavka) is one of them. Trnavka is not. Trnavka is a cadastral area in Ruzinov. This page is about Ruzinov, which contains Trnavka, which hosts the airport.
Sf222 18:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: The Milan Rastislav Stefanik international airport is in Vajnory, not in Ružinov
Talk:Francisco de Toledo, Count of Oropesa

message: I removed the POV tag when I edited and expanded the article. I think the problem is taken care of, but if there is something else that should be done, please let me know.
Rbraunwa 17:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV removed

message: As a Spanish-born Spanish administrator of a Spanish viceroyalty, is there any reason at all that his name is given in the article as "de Toledus"? Restored to Spanish and removed. I love Latin as much as the next Classics geek and if his works in Latina are common enough for de Toledus to be searched, by all means add it as an alias, but the Spanish should certainly be the article lede. -LlywelynII (talk) 12:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Latinate Name
Talk:Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement

message: This article is not a site map for "nationalist.org". There are several links to that domain in the "external links" section. A infobox with another dozen or more is not called for. If the webmaster of that website would like to provide a page on this topic, with all of the subsidiary pages linked, then we can link to that. But this is too much. -Willmcw 20:36, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
All right, this article needs to be reworked entirely. I hope someone's listening. Look at this, it's just an advertisement for Richard Barrett. In fact he, as you can see from the history of the page, wrote and added to the article from the very beginning.  He is Crosstar.
The article is filled with biased and undocumented information.  For example, while history shows that the Justices did interrupt Barrett while he spoke, the article fails to mention that Barrett was insulting "negro" Justice Clarence Thomas at the time, calling for only "Americans" to lead the American courts.
Barrett wrote this, and it's just a self-serving ego-boost.  Until someone fixes it, I am voting to delete it. Jwilke 23:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks substantially improved to me (including the above specific problems being fixed).  Are there further issues? --Delirium 03:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This "
Sixty-six Nationalists were arrested and police dispersed the paraders on the grounds that they lacked a permit.
 is an extremely dishonest sentence. It leads one to believe that the 20,000 marchers were dispersed, which is untrue. I can witness to this, having been a participant. In fact it was the Nationalist counter-protesters who were charged with parading without a permit.
::Is there any verifiable source for this info? WP:V.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 03:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 24, 1987 facts 
Category talk:Obsolete scientific theories

message: The definition of Obsolete scientific theories in this category: "...a scientific theory that was once commonly accepted but (for whatever reason) is no longer considered the most complete description of reality by mainstream science; or a falsifiable theory which has been shown to be false" appears to interject an absolute dismissive and "point of view" tone to evolving science theories.
Some theories included in this category have not in fact been shown to be false even though they may not be considered "the most complete description of reality by mainstream science." The evolution of science theory has shown mainstream science to be repeatedly capable of supporting prevailing scientific models which did not stand the test of long-term scrutiny. It is too early to close the door on some theories in this category because the prevailing models used to falsify them have themselves not been proven beyond the reasonable doubt needed to uphold them as absolute and exclusive explanations of the reality that science explores. I note Aether theories and Expanding earth theory as examples of such misappropriation.
There exists a rigorous debate amongst many scientists today who challenge mainstream science's shutting out of viable scientific models in favor of the exclusive adoption of the one prevailing model supported by the mainstream scientific community. The following cosmology statement at this link is but one example of such discontent.
It would indeed behoove the Wikipedia Foundation to categorize scientific theory in a more unbiased fashion rather than appear to lend a priority to mainstream consensus by dismissing scientific theories which remain viable, though perhaps errantly considered to have been falsified. The sciences are an evolving study and there remains much more unknown than proven within the range of the present consensus scientific model. Wikipedia's science theory categories should reflect this evolving reality and not present such an absolute classification of still viable theories as obsolete, as has been done here. MichaelNetzer 12:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think this should not be a category. It's definitely POV. For instance newton's theories have been superseded by relativity but they are not listed here.Tstrobaugh (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Obsolete" a Dismissive Point of View Term? 

message: The "Passing Star Hypothesis" link does not point to an article that discusses the passing star hypothesis. It should perhaps point to the "Tidal Theory" section of the article History_of_Solar_System_formation_and_evolution_hypotheses
35.9.60.82 (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect reference
Talk:Alexander Alam

message: The content of this article appears to be copied directly from here.  Is that a problem? I poked around that website a bit and couldn't find any copyright notice, but I'm not an expert on copyright.
Alynna 20:42, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 15 years later, I have removed the philanthropy section which appears to have been copied from the site linked, now archived. --Find bruce (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: copied
Talk:Bloop

message: The addition to the popular culture section about VTuber Gawr Gura's sidekick was removed as vandalism, but I do not see how it is such. Her sidekick Bloop is clearly named after the subject matter of this article. This becomes evident when she lists option C when she quizzes her friends on him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkbXdXbs8vk&t=2383 The correct answer may have been 'B' ("emergency ration"), but it shows that there is a relevant connection. Kapten Nordstroem (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not say it was vandalism. I said it was "non notable".  ApLundell (talk) 14:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I misread the page history. It was the person who added the pop-culture reference that removed vandalism. Kapten Nordstroem (talk) 22:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gawr Gura's sidekick 

message: Due to how extremely common "The Bloop" has become as a creature in "internet culture", I feel a larger section on it's usage and the popular depictions of it as a fish with a large mouth is warranted. 79.167.144.73 (talk) 00:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should there be a more extensive section on cultural relevance?
Talk:Gengar

message: ...That in Mystery Dungeon, Gengar was the one in the story? Crowstar 11:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I gathered from the game itself, that's debatable, but I wasn't paying much attantion at the time... -Jeske (v^_^v) 13:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

text: As I said, I wasn't paying much attention at the time. -Jeske (v^_^v) 17:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it worth putting... 
Talk:Duke's Mayo Bowl

message: I have a question about the Gary Hahn "illegal aliens" incident. Please comment here, if you have an insightful opinion. Thank you. - Hard thoughtful work (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy (2022)
Talk:Dmitry of Suzdal

message: Should we move the article to Dmitry Konstantinovich of Suzdal or something similar? I am no expert, so I am not moving the article. Just thought to propose it here. Thanks! -Irpen 21:30, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
:That was my mistake, a silly one, there is Dmitry Konstantinovich Romanov, son of Grand Duke Konstantin Konstantinovich of Russia, I've fixed a redlink with this one, btw, if someone makes an article about Romanov here is a site with image: , an reproduction of an old photo - should not be copirighted Gnomz007 03:44, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the article should be moved. First of all, Dmitry was prince of Nizhny Novgorod and Vladimir, not of Suzdal only. Secondly, Grand Duke Dmitry Konstantinovich was a far less important person and should be the subject of Grand Duke Dmitry Konstantinovich article. Also, we have the articles like Mikhail Yaroslavich about Mikhail of Tver, and their titles haven't been questioned as yet. --Ghirlandajo 10:55, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Dafydd Iwan

message: Some say the beginning of the end of Dafydd Iwan's political career was the Hafan Pwllheli fiasco. A proposal to extend the marina in Pwllheli by 300 berths was supported by Dafydd Iwan, but rejected by many Plaid Cymru councillors for being a threat to the Welsh language.
Removed the above which is (a) unattributed (b) far too strongly expressed, makes it sound as if it's taken for granted his career is on the rocks.  The way the BBC report it  it hardly looks like a "fiasco" or the end of his career, more like just one incident in a long political life, and not (yet at least) worthy of inclusion in this short entry. 
Flapdragon 21:32, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hafan Pwllheli

message: Oh dear, we have a puzzle here!
On Dafydd Iwan's official website (http://dafyddiwan.com), the English part of the site says Aug 23rd, but the Welsh part says 24th!
(A web search throws up lots of 24ths, but these references have come from this site, which said 24 up till today, when it was changed).
Personally I'd be tempted to trust the Welsh more (i.e. 24rd) as the original article was almost certainly written in Welsh, then translated (with the error) to the English.  Hogyn Lleol 12:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: Why does the article mention Alun Ffred, but not his rather famous brother Huw Ceredig?130.212.93.30 (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family members 
Talk:Matao Herrera

message: This article, along with a number of similar articles, was nominated for deletion on 1 August 2005. The consensus at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Claudia Pérez was to redirect all of the articles to McDonald's massacre, which includes a list of the victims. Please do not restore this article. DDerby(talk) 17:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  article should be redirect
Talk:Vaya (EP)

message: "The 10" was then re-released as a hot-pink vinyl on June 5, 2012 with 1,500 copies in North American and 1,500 copies elsewhere. A vibrant red edition of 1,000 of the 10" was also available from Hot Topic stores."  It is impressive that it was done in the future.--184.80.140.146 (talk) 13:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled