Talk:List of router and firewall distributions

message: I don't know how to cite things, I'm not even good at using wikipedia (not sure if I'm doing this right, either)... But at the end, where it says a citation is needed for Zeroshell, I have the page:
http://www.zeroshell.net/
And here's the page explaining about the QoS:
http://www.zeroshell.net/qos/
Could someone cite this for me? Because I don't know how  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.199.6 (talk) 12:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not sure how to cite, but...

message: I'm pretty certain that this page would be better handled as a category.
Suggest making it a redirect to the cateogory page.
--Joewski 20:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better handled as a category

message: I humbly suggest that the pfsense link be removed. Tdelporto 00:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: pfsense is FreeBSD based

message: www.xorp.org might need included.  It uses BSD license & is free.  Also, I think vyatta is based on xorp. vyatta is both community and commercial.  www.vyatta.org & www.vyatta.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.223.173.45 (talk) 22:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: XORP might need included

message: Why does this list only seem to contain Linux operating systems ? No every router is based on Linux.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluezy (talk • contribs) 09:10, 3 March 2010
:Most have some Unix base or are proprietary. I believe that Windows Server versions can also route. Andyoutside (talk) 08:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  why only Linux ? 

message: Kerio Connect (was Winroute) is missing from the list.
It is available as a virtual appliance for VMWare.
www.kerio.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruceJStedman (talk • contribs) 19:40, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kerio missing 

message: http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ipfire  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.121.48.98 (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPFire missing 

message: I added NethServer as a Firewall/UTM distributution to the list. No dedicated page for NethServer exists yet. I hope the NethServer community can work on this in the near future.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob.bosch (talk • contribs) 11:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: added NethServer

message: It would be nice if there'd be more separation in terms of free for personal use, free for commercial use, and so on.
And also, if we'd have a list of which of them have features such as QoS for example, it would be great.
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.139.26 (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 

message: (1) IPFire distro is missing a link to their website: https://www.ipfire.org/ URL.
(2) Under "Architecture", IPFire support x86_64 out of the box.
(3) Descriptios should include the following keywords: Web-Based, Internet Gateway, Router, Firewall & Wireless Access Point capable.
The latest version is extremely polished and sufficient for even a novice user out of the box. Installs via USB stick. Extensive documentation in their wiki and active and helpful community.  Full WAP support.
Note: pfsense (BSD) is fast morphing into a commercial beast and has a broken implementation of SIP behind NAT, IPFire fills a critical need.  pfsense is extremely picky about wifi cards. Ragarwal74 (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Regards to each point, 1) the link is already in the note for the "description" column, 2) X86 includes x8664 so not change is needed, and 3)Wikipedia is not for advertising or keyword-seeding and the promotional language and keyword request is inappropriate under the core content policies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2017