lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario

message: I believe this short description should read "centre to centre right". My belief is that the conservative party is equal distance from the centre as the liberal party is (to opposite sides of course). The Ontario liberal page says "centre to centre left" and I think it is agreeable that both parties exemplify centrist policies. I think there should be consistently in how the political party is portrayed in respect to the liberal party, especially given the current Ontario PC government's shift towards the centre. Mangbroson (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This perspective is aligned with most sources. The PCPO tends to fluctuate its stance between centre and centre-right depending on the leader and time period. I endorse this change. Humberland (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political position 
Talk:Paleozoic

message: So I just noticed that the entire Climate section is copied from here:http://www.palaeos.com/Paleozoic/Paleozoic.htm#climate 24.20.192.251 (talk) 02:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Direct Quotes

message: Does anyone know how to make the Contents box appear on this page?
Never mind everyone. I have found out how to do it. For everyone who needs to know, put Overview at the top of the first paragraph. Then save the change. This should make the contents box appear.:()
:No, we don't start with a header. If there are too few sections <4 the table of contents won't be displayed. I removed a bunch of duplication added sometime ?? Also a couple headers so your TOC shows up :-) Vsmith 04:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of contents 

message: Rompe's recent change, removing Mississippian and Pennsylvanian, is, strictly speaking, correct.  The ICS considers them to be epochs of the Carboniferous.  However, as explained at Mississippian and Pennsylvanian, in North America both are indeed treated as full geologic periods.  I wonder if a similar explanation is appropriate here?--Geologyguy 12:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mississippian-Pennsylvanian

message: I've changed some capitals on time period names per the International Stratigraphic Guide, Chapter 9. Chronostratigraphic Units which states:
:A formal chronostratigraphic unit is given a binomial designation - a proper name plus a term-word - and the initial letters of both are capitalized. Its geochronologic equivalent uses the same proper name combined with the equivalent geochronologic term, e.g., Cretaceous System - Cretaceous Period.  
Vsmith (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As you can see here, the ICS has been only half successful in changing the traditional lower-case usage.  Per MOS:CAPS, WP style is to prefer lower case when the capitalization in sources is this inconsistent.  See also WP:SSF.  Can we roll these changes back now, please?  Dicklyon (talk) 02:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization per ICS 

message: This article uses the term Middle Paleozoic but doesn't say when it was. Zyxwv99 (talk) 22:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It mainly uses the informal term "middle Paleozoic" and goes on to mention the Silurian and the Devonian, so that's the period of time being discussed. There is no formal subdivision of the Paleozoic called the "Middle Paleozoic". The article also uses the terms "early Paleozoic" and "late Paleozoic", but these are equally informal. It would be preferable to rewrite that section without using those terms, in my view. Mikenorton (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Changing it to lower case is an improvement. Zyxwv99 (talk) 21:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle Paleozoic? 

message: The Ordovician-Silurian extinction event is stated to be the first mass extinction however the Great Oxygenation Event was a mass extinction and it occurred before the Ordovician-Silurian Extinction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Little Crums (talk • contribs) 00:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordovician
Talk:Archie Andrews (disambiguation)

message: Bob Montana's characters were adapted to radio in the early 1940s. Archie Andrews began on the Blue Network May 31, 1943, switched to Mutual in 1944, and then continued on NBC until September 5, 1943. 
Well, that's sure a neat trick! Does anyone know when the radio series ended?Rockhopper10r 17:48, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the date fix. A disambiguation page is a good idea. The US and British characters most likely developed independently.Rockhopper10r 17:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All disambiguated and updated.Rockhopper10r 19:19, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio Dates
Talk:Conservative Party of Canada (1867–1942)

message: Montrealais must have forgotten, as the above comment was from 2004. I have renamed it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, just to be clear, Montréalais in fact did make exactly the article move he proposed in the above comment, which was a change of the disambiguator from "historic" to "historical". It is in fact the correct title here, because this is an article about a distinct historical entity which no longer exists, and not the history of the current Conservative Party of Canada — "History of the Conservative Party of Canada" would only be the correct title if we were to merge this, the PCs, Reform and the Canadian Alliance into a single article. Bearcat (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed

message: *National Government (Canada) was a moniker used just once by the Tories in 1940, and I believe it would be helpful to people interested in the history of the Tories to merge that stub article into here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would even go so far as to suggest merging this with Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. The two articles are about the same party before and after a name change. I don't think that changing a party's name really warrants a new article.  —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 09:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: If the Conservatives campaigned on a promise to end the depression by higher tariffs how can this article describe their economic policy to have been laissez-faire as tariffs are a major impediment to free trade and market? --80.221.68.148 (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depression
Talk:Glasya-Labolas

message: how can it have the wings of a griffin when the griffin has wings of a eagle?
that doesn't make sence, can someone cite this source?--Manwithbrisk 21:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose they must be larger than an eagle to support the size of the griffin, therefore any other example of eagles wings in such dimension are griffin's wings. At least, that's my rationalization of it. 67.5.147.11 (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wings of a griffin?
Talk:Boston Red Sox

message: The article is wrong that the Red Sox have played in 14 world series. In 1904, Boston had qualified but there was no world series. 2601:646:8981:7460:8D22:B76B:29BE:A862 (talk) 13:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done You are correct. I will fix that prose. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:28, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2021 

message: 2015 song by James Taylor about his grandmother taking him to Red Sox games, watching the 2004 game from a hospital bed, and dying with “a little smile on her face” 69.121.111.207 (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angels of Fenway 

message: Can you get the general manager right??!! 2600:6C64:497F:EC1D:A0C2:B633:1816:33BB (talk) 15:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We did. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 September 2022 

message: current text:
It was stated by Epstein that the decision on not renew Little's contract
proposed edit:
It was stated by Epstein that the decision to not renew Little's contract 2601:193:8200:21:6C47:ACD3:4BB1:2D34 (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ULPS (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2023 

message: Change “ Since the 1995 inception of the wild card team and an added Division Series, every postseason except for 2014 has featured one or both of the American League East rivals.” to “ Since the 1995 inception of the wild card team and an added Division Series, every postseason except for 2014 and 2023 has featured one or both of the American League East rivals.” 47.134.99.109 (talk) 03:59, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023
Talk:Big Bone Lick State Park

message: I heard that the creek where the salt lick is located is brackish water; is this true and if so does it have brackish fauna and flora or some unique adaptations? Thanks.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.0.193 (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Salt lick

message: Why does this page link to itself?--69.54.129.161 03:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick question 

message: Is that correct? or should it be "skull from a 1000 pound mastodon"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.27.33.2 (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 1000 pound mastodon skull

message: "It is located on Beaver Road and between the communities of Beaverlick and Rabbit Hash."
It is not so. This is vandalism.Pinikadia 05:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism on this page.
Talk:Communism in Peru

message: Actually this doesn't function as a disambig since there is only one party (i.e. Sendero) using the name PC del P. Info on other parties should be shifted to individual articles. Alternatively convert the article into "Left in Peru" or something.
*And what about this source: http://www.broadleft.org/pe.htm ?--AAAAA 14:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  back to redirect 

message: Does anyone know the status of the MNI in Peru?  I think Patria Roja might lead this group (at least the parts of Cusco that are dominated by Patria Roja murals are also dominated by MNI murals and flags), and they seem to claim that they have formed a broad coalition of all the Marxist parties in Peru. Descendall 15:47, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movimiento Nueva Izquierda  

message: If anyone could shed some light on Puka Llacta, I'd appreciate it.  I'm almost positive that they don't exist anymore.  They were Maoist, and I believe that they officially backed the "People's War" during the 80's and early 90's, though I don't know if they actually participated in it.  This would make them different that their similarly-named Patria Roja Descendall 15:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, thanks. Descendall 11:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puka Llacta
Talk:List of Canadian federal general elections

message: To add to article: are paper ballots or electronic voting used? 76.189.141.37 (talk) 04:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: Can we get an update of :File:Canadian federal election results.png to include 2015? Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 08:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced the old graph image with a graph generated from a template. This not only corrects some of the parties' colours, but also adds data from the 2015 and 2019 elections. I've also taken the liberty of trying to roughly sort the parties along the political spectrum, whereas the previous version was sorted chronologically, i.e. adding them to the bottom of the list as they appear in elections. I left out some minor parties like Labour, partly because the old PNG version did the same, but also because I understand too little about the political subtleties, e.g. I'm not sure whether I'd attribute Progressive-Labour to Progressive or to Labour, so I just ended up leaving them in Independent / others. I used the single election articles as a guideline as to which party counted towards parliamentary groups and which towards others. This should also make maintenance easier, as future results can just be added to the comma-delimited lists. --Safto Rangen (talk) 00:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bar graph of results from 1867 to 2011—update for 2015 and 2019 

message: It was notable that the greens won their first seat in 2011 and, I think, notable that they won 2 more in 2019. Is it worth updating the "Fifth party" slot to contain "1, 1, 3" (with respective reduction in "other" column) and a green bar?
- Groostav (talk) 04:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Greens as "Fifth party" for 41st-43rd parliament? 

message: The article title should be List of Canadian federal elections. -- GoodDay (talk) 00:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Oklahoma City bombing

message: Dumuzid, that's what I initially thought, but the word "fiery" literally means "flame-ridden". I don't especially like the term but it is verifiable. Cessaune [talk] 15:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Cessaune, and thanks for including your reasoning.  I don't dispute that it is either literally true or that it is verifiable, but that does not mean it must be included.  As I said, it seems to me a bit much and that it makes the sentence read as less encyclopedic.  All that said, if there is a consensus for inclusion, I certainly won't complain.  Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 15:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fiery" 

message: McVeigh approached Fortier and asked him to assist with the bombing project, but he refused.[37][38]
This infuriates me. Who the fuck is Fortier. Shitty edit. No proper context. 75.175.67.175 (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: While context might be lacking in the beginning of that subsection Michael Fortier is introduced and discussed at several other points in the article.  Do you have a suggestion as to how one might give the context you want?  I am a bit unsure how to do so without just seeming redundant.  Cheers and Happy Friday! Dumuzid (talk) 21:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we just blue link to another section where Fortier is discussed? Springee (talk) 22:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gathering Materials subsection  

message: This article is categorised as being a Right-wing terrorist attack and is mentioned as such in the infobox, yet not one mention of this being a right wing terrorist attack is given in the article. Furthermore despite being the main image for the right-wing terrorism page said article doesn't say the Oklahoma City bombing was a right-wing terrorist attack and the definition given in the lead contradicts it's inclusion.
I personally think after reading through the article the motivations are beyond simple left/right dichotomy but I do believe that there are probably reliable sources describing it as a right wing terrorist attack; however without any mention of it as such it's currently an unsourced claim that's been inserted by editors on their own opinion/belief about the incident. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right wing terrorism.
Talk:Cg (programming language)

message: Maybe it should be a full code of program, for example in C, which uses Cg. ( I can't do it  ). --Adam majewski (talk) 07:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cg full program 

message: From https://developer.nvidia.com/cg-toolkit:
The Cg Toolkit is a legacy NVIDIA toolkit no longer under active development or support. Cg 3.1 is our last release and while we continue to make it available to developers, we do not recommend using it in new development projects because future hardware features may not be supported.
The last version was released in April 2012 - two years ago. It seems a bit strange that this page hasn't been updated to show that yet. 217.43.156.56 (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now Deprecated
Talk:Fritillaria meleagris

message: I moved it back to the Latin name because there seem to be many common English names for it.
Also, I don't seem to see how the plant is endemic to Croatia. Perhaps the original contributor of that part could enlighten us... --Shallot 02:40, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 14, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-11-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 21:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:German Air Ministry (1933-45)

message: This is an English-language encyclopaedia. "Reichsluftfahrtministerium" is not an English word. This article should be moved to German Air Ministry. Adam 06:35, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: See comments I left on German Air Ministry aircraft designation system --Rlandmann 05:07, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: And see my replies thereto at the same place. Here the situation is even clearer because I added {1939-45) to distinguish from any postwar Air Ministry that might exist. Adam 08:12, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of companies of New Zealand

message: The  and  templates automatically add the category to them. I see that when created, so did , but only for an hour. Any reason to not add the category automatically? --Scott Davis Talk 04:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I created the  template I made it so that it when a  company uses the template then it is automatically added to just the List of Companies traded on the New Zealand Stock Exchange and therefore they would also automatically be added upstream to those listed companies internationally. Your newly added ANZ listing is still showing. I think from your post that you are suggesting that the template be modified to automatically added NZX companies to the great List of NZ Companies? I can look to modify the template if that is wanted by others here. Regards Tom Webb 04:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I manually added  to the bottom of ANZ. It didn't join the category just by having  at the top. The other two don't need to be explicit at the bottom. --Scott Davis Talk 06:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template can automatically add category

message: Where might I find the rules for inclusion / exclusion of a company in this list. I notice, for example, no mention of ANZ Bank yet there is a listing for the Bank of New Zealand, a subsidiary of an Australian bank (ANZ is an Australian Bank). 
No mention of Westpac, National Bank of New Zealand. New Zealand Forest Products, New Zealand Motor Corporation . . . 
Why is this list here?
Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Now we have a new addition called The Story Hub which is apparently a few months old and makes podcasts about religious matters. Does this fit with the  chosen topic? Eddaido (talk) 23:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rules
Talk:New Caledonia

message: Hello, I am trying to find out among the finest scholars of the subject if before the European term of New Caledonia and the Kanak term of Kanaky, there existed a precolonial term to designate the archipelago or at least the Grand Terre. SuperSygma (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there wasn't any. New Caledonia was inhabited by people who spoke more than 30 very different languages with little mutual intelligibility. ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ (talk) 17:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-colonial name of New Caledonia/Grande-Terre 
Talk:Slasher film

message: In the "origins" section, there is the following ambiguous sentence:
"Maurice Tourneur's The Lunatics (1912) used visceral violence to attract the Guignol's audience; films like this eventually led to public outcry in the United States, eventually passing the Hays Code in 1930."
Grammatically, this sentence literally says that "The Lunatics" was what passed the Hays Code, when what is meant is that the United States passed the Hays Code. A clearer way of phrasing this would be:
Maurice Tourneur's The Lunatics (1912) used visceral violence to attract the Guignol's audience. In the United States, public outcry over films like this led to the passage of the Hays Code in 1930. 2601:249:8100:AB10:C531:FD28:2040:1581 (talk) 12:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you for your input! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 23:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2021 

message: The opening sentence has the word "subgenre" linked, but horror film is not?? Really?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.86.46.50 (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . Heartmusic678 (talk) 13:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No link? 

message: I've tagged several statements and items that require a clean-up in this article. So much of it is just material stating films were financial success or not, assuming why or why not they may have been this, then citing box office mojo and rotten tomatoes. There is no mention of this in their respective sources, nor is there mention of them even belonging to the slasher genre. A real over view needs to be done to make this less like it was written from a fan perspective. I've dumped out just listing international productions as just saying this country released this or that, doesn't really add up to much. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up