lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Trail of the Lonesome Pine (novel)

message: Let's make this The Trail of the Lonesome Pine, The Trail of the Lonesome Pine (1936 film), and The Trail of the Lonesome Pine (outdoor production), since those seem to be the three most notable incarnations. That way if someone comes along later with details about the other films, they can have their own articles too. If I don't get round to this first, feel free to do the split. Cheers, Her Pegship 16:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there enough unique encyclopedic information about the three to warrant three different articles? --Takeel 18:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree about split for same reason as Takeel. Since the productions are very similar and there isn't a wealth of encyclopedic knowledge available about any of them, three separate articles would make no sense. Volatile 18:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 'em up 

message: How does all this relate to the song with this refrain "on the trail of the lonesome pine", popular in western square dancing circa 1960 (southern California)?-69.87.193.144 01:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  song with this refrain 
Talk:Remote base station

message: THe para is unclear as to its meaning. Any body care to expalin t?
An Amateur radio operator may wish to use a remote base station in such cases where he/she could not construct a station in his/her home, the ideal location for a station is not easily accessible (The Amateur radio operator lives in a deep valley, but the ideal location may be on top of a mountain). A group of Amateur radio operators may wish to build a Remote base station to share the cost of a single station.
''
--Light current 23:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from page 

message: Recent internet technologies have allowed ham radio operators to setup remote bases on the internet. Many people have setup similar remotes such as echolink or irlp. Now you can fully control radios and transmit on them using multiple software packages. You may find more information and a list of online radio bases at http://www.remotehams.com/online.html
Telecommand is defined by the FCC as a one-way transmission to initiate, modify or terminate functions of a device at a distance [97.3(a)(43)]. If you are using a radio or wire line link to remotely control a station, this is "telecommand."
Control (or telecommand) links may be wire (a telephone, fiber optic line, Internet, etc.) or radio. The FCC says that if a radio link is used, the station where the control commands are performed is an auxiliary station [97.213(a)] and an auxiliary station is "an amateur station transmitting communications point-to-point within a system of cooperating amateur stations" [97.3(a)(7)]. All auxiliary operations must be conducted on appropriate frequencies above 222.15 MHz. 
Enjoy listening to Aircraft, Boats, Ham Radio, Shortwave & rare DX you may never hear have a chance to hear from your own home without a radio!. Test your own signal propagation, are you being heard is DX locations? This is all possible with online remote base technology. A great website demonstrating this technology is http://www.remotehams.com/
Kg6ypi (talk) 07:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online Remote Bases
Talk:Lists of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States

message: I stumbled into List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States (Seat 1), and was nonplused to find a photo there of but one of the many clerks past and present who have held the position. This seemed a bit self-serving. 
I then checked the pages for clerks of the other seats, and found them to be inconsistent: photos of the present justice, a former justice, miscellaneous others who have been clerks for the seat, and none at all. This mildly offends my sense of order, and is made worse by the fact that the photos are used for mouseover previews.
Since my interest in this area is accidental, I am averse to straightening it out on my own. Perhaps someone with an interest and/or history in the area might undertake it. The obvious choices are (a) the current or final justice holding the seat, or (b) no photos at all.
GreenEyewash (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Top of that pile, List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States (Chief Justice), offers a gratuitous photo, to be sure. I have a new judge page half-written that I can't seem to finish, but will look through these possible photo ops once I do. Often nonplussed, Lindenfall (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gratuitous Photos on Pages of Clerks for Individual Seats
Talk:Auditor Security Collection

message: I've cleaned up this article a bit, added pictures, and put a list of programs on the Live CD. Should I remove the cleanup note or should I leave it and let someone read over it and then remove it, or do administrators have to remove it? I don't know if it's completely cleaned up, so I wanted to check. Thanks, Will G. 23:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone can remove the tag, but it should be kept for now. The article includes a huge list. We need to study what to do about it first.--Chealer 00:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup?
Talk:Thomas B. Peddie

message: I'm curious, how did you learn about TB Peddie?
Have you seen my website? www.newarkhistory.com/peddie1.html
Dinopup 00:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1.  how does subject get from immigrating to hightstown to becoming mayor of newark?  hightstown is not next door to newark.  article is missing transition.
2.  the mention of his shop on "broad street" is confusing.  google maps indicates there is a "broad street" in hightstown, but the more famous (i'm sure) "broad street" is in newark.  one could easily suspect that his business was in newark.  needs confirmation and clarity in writing to avoid cross confusion between the 2 broad streets.
3a.  one could easily assume (a dangerous concept!) that the "first baptist church" to which the subjectc donated was later renamed "Peddie Memorial Baptist Church" (this memorial church is mentioned in the "legacy" section).  needs confirmation and, if so, loop made.
3b.  who is H. J. Latham and where did he published quoted material?
4.  "legacy" section indicates that "peddie school" was named after him.  wiki article on Peddie School indicates that subject donated US$25,000 to found the school.  subject's article is silent on this financial matter.  as peddie school article is mostly unsourced (as is subject article), hesitant to pull language from there.
5.  "patent" section.
a.  it would appear that the patent described was owned by subject.  how to verify and flush out section.
b.  unable to easily find dope on what a "pellesier" might be.  "define:pellesier" at google fails me; wiktionary has no entry either.  am assuming it's something to do with tack work (saddlery) or other leather-travel field
6.  photograph has no caption (specifically no date taken).
7.  would expect info box to follow style of Ed Koch or patrick moynihan or charlie rangel. (i'm not experienced in info box templates, etc.)
8.  "he was president of the Board of Trade"  which board of trade?  was there/is there a NJ board of trade?  a newark b of t?  was subject affiliated with the new york board of trade (seems a stretch).--71.183.238.134 (talk) 03:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  some mysteries of article
Talk:2006 National People's Congress

message: "Analysts concluded that the report was thorough, detailed, thoughtful, and reached out to the people. It contained less political overtones than previous years. The longest applause came, as expected, during Wen's mention of the firm stance against Taiwan independence." -does this satisfy the objectivity required for a wikipedia page?
You can add more if you want. But from the analysts I watched on TV (Hong Kong and mainland), there seems to be a consensus. But don't miunderstand me. I think most government reports says they are going to achieve great things, but can only fulfill so many promises. Colipon+(T) 23:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: whats is the significance of this phrase being left out in relation to hu jintao?
basically, it shows one of two possible things:
#Unlike Jiang Zemin's administration, Hu's administration is less focused on the enforced grand image of its leader.
#Jiang is still de facto paramount leader, having great enough influence that Hu cannot yet be considered the "core" even though he holds all three highest titles (military, party, state).
Next time, please sign your comment.
Colipon+(T) 23:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core of Leadership 

message: The Communist Party of Vietnam will also be having a National People's Progress in 2006.  I suggest the title be changed to disambiguate. DHN 03:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnam 

message: ::In Hu Jintao's administration, the 2006 NPC is more open than previous years. 
Not clear to me that this is true.
Roadrunner 17:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed item 
Talk:MusE

message: This article was redirected to MuSE as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A review of that discussion can be found here.  Rossami (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Umagon

message: This article was tagged for a merge as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I recommend that this article be merged into Other Characters of Command & Conquer, rather than Command & Conquer: Tiberian series. Mrbowtie 12:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Six Shooter (film)

message: It's an Irish film: http://www.rte.ie/arts/2006/0131/oscar.html Pockets23 00:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The film is a British & Irish co-production, i.e. it was co-financed and co-produced by two countries (Film Four & Missing in Action Films from the UK and The Irish Film Board & Fantastic Films from Ireland). This is very common in the film industry. The correct form is to describe the film as a "Irish / British film" or "British / Irish film" depending on who the majority producing partner was. For lack of such information at present, I have amended to "Irish / British" - source: http://film.britishcouncil.org/six-shooter  A bright cold day in april (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: The kid then tells Donnelly a story about how when he was a kid,
^ what 76.21.125.119 (talk) 08:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am confused 
Talk:Thomas Hinman Moorer

message: There is a stament made in the article which has no source.
*1 Information without source
**"While Chair, Moorer received unauthorized material taken from the White House offices of the National Security Council."
Does anybody know anything about such an incident and can provide sources? It would appear that it should be removed if no source is forthcoming.--TGC55 00:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of Information? 

message: Why is there nothing about his WWII experience?  — Rlevse • Talk •  10:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII

message: The "Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960- Device" is not a US Military award, and should be listed under Foreign Awards.  It was issued by the former Republic of Vietnam --Jeepien (talk) 20:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards

message: Would an interview with Thomas Moorer from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_0F260B5796BE49EAAEFD39E25FBD4958 (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 16:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a problem. Cheers!--A.S. Brown (talk) 23:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy? 

message: I haven't edited a page in quite a while and I have forgotten how. Reference 10 is going to a dead link. The source of the quote is from "They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby" page 161. 
According to Cite This For ME the book cited should read something like this 
Findley, P. (1989) ‘“I’ll Take Care of the Congress”’, in They dare to speak out people and institutions confront Israel’s lobby. Chicago, Ill: Hill, pp. 161. PapiGrande (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I stumbled through it PapiGrande (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference 10
Talk:Titanic (magazine)

message: Would this form a sufficient reference or source:
http://www.brandeins.de/home/inhalt_detail.asp?id=638&MenuID=130 ?
That article about the Titanic magazine is written in german (well, it's not so easy to find an english article or web page about a german magazine, even if it is the "leading" satirical magazine of Germany) so you probably can't read it easily but it confirms most of the statements about the Titanic magazine made here. IOOI 00:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Corps Series

message: Since this is a book series, and you're giving away some of the final details as of Retreat, Hell, perhaps a spoiler tag should be in place to warn potential readers of the series?  --Ncc1701 00:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: -- Never mind.  I missed it the first time around. --Ncc1701 00:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler Tag?

message: Took some cues from the Badge of Honor article and removed references to ranks as they are very transitory through out the book.  Fleshed out the character descriptions a bit.  --Ncc1701 01:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast Adjustments

message: I believe McCoy's Bronze Star Medal may be an anachronism. He was awarded it in late 1941 or early 1942, I forget which, but according to the article, it didn't exist at that time. I am only 1/2 way thru book 2 for the first time, and don't want to hit any spoilers so I did a search for "Star" and the only ref to this didn't say any year. Feel free to add this to the article. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 20:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Balanced line

message: "Symmetric differential signals exist to prevent interference to other circuits (crosstalk)[11] - the electromagnetic fields are canceled out by the equal and opposite currents. But they are not necessary for interference rejection from other circuits"
This sentence is not completely untrue, but it creates an incorrect impression that differential signaling is separate from balanced transmission line. In practice these are very closely related, so it's just confusing interested readers. I think it should be removed
If you deliberately feed a signal that is not differential (i.e., has significant common mode power) through a balanced line into a balanced circuit, the differential component of the signal will have good interference rejection, but the common mode component will not. In addition, the crosstalk created by  the common mode signal may be far more than what the balanced line is expected to generate.
If it's not deliberate and you don't care about the common mode signal and have good CMRR, you may think it's ok. But then any non-differential component is just a waste of power. So in general, transmitting a non-differential signal over a balanced medium is poor engineering. Laugh Tough (talk) 16:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Interference rejection depends on the balance, it really is not relevant what the signal is doing.  I don't understand in what sense this amounts to a waste of power.  Where is signal power being absorbed before it gets to the receiver?  Do you have any sources backing up your claims? SpinningSpark 20:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  differential signals and crosstalk, again
Talk:Supply officer (Royal Navy)

message: This article was written on 4, 5 and 6 March 2006 by Lester May (a former Royal Navy Supply Officer).  It is now at its maximum length permitted by Wikipedia.  A solution may be to create a separate article for the list of admirals - at the end of the present article - which I hope will be added to by others.
If you know how to change the title to Supply Officer - capital S and O - then please do so!
Lestermay 02:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wine cave

message: 1) There were no references because someone, during an aggressive edit, chopped them off. A basic refernce to the original author of the paper (used by permission) has been replaced.
2) Regarding the "World View": Much of the information given in this article points specifically to Northern California where wine caves are booming in popularity. However, this is not to say that the information can not be applied to other wine-growing regions of the world. If anyone would like to add information specific to other regions, please do so.
:I removed the external links. There were no references, only links to wine producers sites and to the company of the author. None of them provided the quality of references needed for the article. The wine caves page on the company site is nothing but a short marketing blurb. Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources to find the quality of sources needed. --GraemeL (talk) 00:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing Issues: 

message: I'm okay with Wine Cave being merged into Wine Cellar, as long as Wine Cellar remains the name of the article. It is by far the most popular use with a "Wave Cave", actually just being a type of Wine Cellar. Agne 11:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Packard Executive

message: I came across this article while placing the Packard Template on it.  POV writing needs to be removed, more facts and references/sources, etc.; the whole article needs help in coming up to Wikipedia standards. Stude62 00:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up requested

message: There's some confusion evident. Florey says the Exec was dropped in '55; the page says not even intro til '56... Absent better knowledge, I'd speculate it's the Clipper Exec that was dropped. Can somebody clear this up?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  10:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Executive decision
Talk:Product (chemistry)

message: There were duplicate stub pages for substrate and product.
*Substrate: Substrate (chemistry) and Enzyme substrate (biology)
*Product: Product (chemistry) and Product (biology)
Discussion on WP:MCB page
I've therefore merged the stub product (biology) into this page. I've added it as the Biochemistry section at the bottom. 
T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 10:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged in [[Product (biology)]] 

message: Name the product 103.146.224.230 (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry
Talk:Scheels

message: Source (University of North Dakota)
Should this be included in the main article?
134.129.137.131 (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  $1 Million donation to University of North Dakota 

message: There is no mention of the Sparks, NV location.  Av555av (talk) 09:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparks Nevada location?
Talk:Graeme Jennings (violinist)

message: Still reads too much like a promotional press release - which it probably was??  (Thanks for correcting my list of previous Arditti 4tet members and dates).  --Farsee50 01:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just as Farsee50 remarked in 2006, this article reads like a personal blog bio page or press release. I'm trying to find suitable sources for (any) of the current statements but it's very hard-- Trove and even ProQuest are very slim on Mr Jennings. He is without doubt an outstanding violinist but that is not a basis for entry into Wikipedia. I will do my best and may raise this article for discussion in the WikiProject Australia pages... Cabrils (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP unsourced
Talk:Andrew Greeley

message: "never having had an unpublished thought." Perhaps this should be xref'd to Jacob Neusner.
:If he said it and you can document it, go ahead.  --Midnite Critic 15:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note that the "Official Website" link here leads to a page called "Unify Cosmos." which briefly mentions Greeley, but seems otherwise devoted to "Tarot Cards" and "Angel Numbers" and other abstractions and numerology. I question that the man would have endorsed this stuff! WHPratt (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Official Website" link
Talk:Starscape

message: Are 'similar games' sections a good idea?
I've put a fair bit of work in cross referencing a couple of games, as I've always found it personally useful, but I wondered what everyone else thought about the practice and it's relevance to wikipedia?
Is it necessary to include the "(computer game)" in the article title? Usually the parentheses are used to differentiate multiple articles with the same title, but this is the only "Starscape" article on the site, so it seems pointless. Solanum 01:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: By the way, all the images in this article need fair use rationales.  I have warned all the uploaders as well, but just wanted to see if anyone read this. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images need fair use rationales
Talk:Hubbell

message: Hmmmm.... I just noticed the effort to get rid of links to disambiguation pages, and read up on what the Manual of Style has to say.  If those of you in the dab project will give me a couple days I'll transfer all these Hubbell people to the List of people by name and divide what's left into a simple dab page and then maybe a surname article or whatever.  Then I'll get rid of the links I've inserted in various articles about individual Hubbells.  Thanks. — Muffuletta 01:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (Done) — Muffuletta 16:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed the following from the article page because they were either redlinks or not linked at all.  Some of them merit articles, though, and ought to be returned to the list if relevant articles are created. — Muffuletta 06:24, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks
Talk:Pixel advertising

message: jamie, if you don't want the link, fine, but please be polite about it. "Spammer" is not a particularly polite term, and please read before removing the content, which was relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.205.186 (talk • contribs) 
* Reponse Other than that one sentence, all of your only contributions thus far have been commercial links. A few whois searches reveal that all of those domains are registered to the same individual in NJ. Wikipedia calls that spamming. OhNoitsJamieTalk 01:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Unfortunately, most of the new addition consists of unsourced assertions and a link to a commercial site.  Though the link is labeled as a "reference," the content doesn't provide any evidence backing up the assertions that I can see. OhNoitsJamieTalk 18:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Marcel Pagnol

message: LOL. How pompous CAN one get?
As to 'fashionable', such comments are totally out of place in a so-called 'encyclopedia'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.155.187 (talk) 11:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarded as an auteur

message: Just a pointer, the link for the play Topaze leads to a rocketry article, not an article on a play. Would change, but don't know anything about it (thats why Im here).
Thanks
shaggysayszoinks 01:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: The article says that Marcel was the eldest son of Joseph and Augustine, however the French wikipedia article on the Pagnol family http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famille_Pagnol  lists an older brother who died in infancy - Maurice Pagnol.
It might also be of some relevance that his younger brother, Paul, died in 1932 since he does make reference to it in some of his work. His two younger siblings, Germaine and Rene, outlived him by some years. 60.240.207.146 (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older brother