Talk:City of Adelaide

message: With regard to the discussion on the Adelaide talk page (here), probably the city of Adelaide article could include the coat of arms: http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/archives/images/adelaide_city_coat_of_arms.jpg. What do you think? — Donama 06:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  coat of arms pic? 

message: :Image:AdelaideCC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AdelaideCC.jpg

message: Although I have no evidence that this is exactly the case, there have been many recent apartment developments (particularly on the Eastern Side of the city, although there are no doubt some significant blocks elsewhere too) that would have considerably boosted the potential city population.  Given that there was a plan to have the population at 17,000 by 2006, I think it is entirely likely that these were timed to be complete before that time, and entirely feasible that by this time the population and indeed reached 17,000 by this time.  As I am not an expert in this area (and wouldn't know where to begin to look), I leave it to someone else to confirm or deny this thought.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.210.255.33 (talk) 10:30, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unexplained" population rise 2005-2006 

message: I propose that Flag of Adelaide be merged into the City of Adelaide's Flag section. I think that the content in the Flag of Adelaide article can easily be explained in the context of the City of Adelaide's Flag section, and the City of Adelaide article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the Flag of Adelaide into it will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. 1.127.48.123 (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: An article that you have been involved in editing—City of Adelaide#Flag—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 1.127.48.123 (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger discussion for [[City of Adelaide#Flag]]

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on City of Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605042755/http://abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/3218.0Main%20Features72008-09?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3218.0&issue=2008-09&num=&view= to http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/3218.0Main%20Features72008-09?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3218.0&issue=2008-09&num=&view=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090908184215/http://www.ecogeek.org:80/content/view/1245/ to http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1245/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on City of Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40.nsf/Latestproducts/3218.0Main%20Features72008-09?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3218.0&issue=2008-09&num=&view=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110228002103/http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/history.html to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110302111822/http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/adccwr/publications/guides_factsheets/lord_mayors_and_mayors_of_adelaide.pdf to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/adccwr/publications/guides_factsheets/lord_mayors_and_mayors_of_adelaide.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/history/those-turbulent-years.html
*Added  tag to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/history/pubs-pews-and-powerbrokers.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101119144518/http://adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/history/the-city-of-adelaide-a-thematic-history.html to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/history/the-city-of-adelaide-a-thematic-history.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120112032118/http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/annual-reports/ to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/annual-reports
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1245/
*Added  tag to http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/council/programs/sister-cities/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to  Adelaide was the only Australian city in 1911 to have a popularly elected mayor. Who reckons this might possibly be true? If yes, ought a note be added to this article? Donama (talk) 00:44, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only popularly elected mayor in Australia in 1911?