lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:In Good Company (2004 film)

message: Why was this page deleted? It seems to have existed at least as a stub as late as 9/13/06 based on the log of this talk page. This was a major studio film starring Dennis Quaid, Scarlett Johansson, Topher Grace, and Malcolm McDowell from 2004. Wl219 06:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why
Talk:Peter Sarsgaard

message: Quite an extensive genealogy of Sarsgaard here. For anyone curious - I remember there were questions about his last name on the archived discussions. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Family tree

message: I question the statement that Peter Sarsgard made his "Broadway" debut at the Royal Court Theatre in Kensington London??
Surely it would be his stage debut or West End debut? Broadway as far as I can tell is still in New York City. Please review & correct as required.
(67.174.166.172 (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Sarsgard 

message: According to the article, his father's name is spelled "Sarsgard", without the extra "A". Why does Peter spell his name differently? This should probably be explained in the article.Tad Lincoln (talk) 01:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra A 

message: The introduction on Sarsgaard is current, but a more detailed review is missing from the later part of this article.  The section on him titled 2003 to Present: Worldwide Recognition was last updated in 2011.  GeeBee60 (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update through 2016?
Talk:In America (film)

message: Is there a reference in the movie that places it into 1982? 
I know that Ariel is after an ET doll, but she may have watched that movie in a later year.
The problem is Christie's Sony Handycam, which was not around until 1990 at least. The NYC cabs also do not look like the things Latka Kravatz used to service...
I think this plays in the 1990s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.189.96.55 (talk) 19:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe we are supposed to accept the film more as a fairytale since the narrator is a young girl who still believes in the magic of wishes and the traditions of her homeland.  The data references tell us that they saw ET in the theater which could be later than it's original release since it was re-relased to theaters.  However, Mateo mentions the blood supply being unsafe, so we are to at least accept this was before HIV was out of the general blood supply.  As for the Camcorder... it's artistic license. Back then there were those big hand-held Camcorders you plug into a TV and I had one but it would have madew the story more clunky and the viewings of Frankie's last days more clunky.  It's easier if you take it as child's mostly accurate recollection with added fantasy elements.  For example, by 1984 in NY, you could not hand food stamops to somebody like cash.  You had to show your card or have an authorized Caregiver card and the "stamps" were for specific things back then.  Each coupon had the user's ID on it.  I know becuase I used to shop for a housebound mother of an infant when I was in Graduate School.  Just enjoy the story and remember Jim Sheridan's duaghters co-wrote the screenplay and their memories may have been a little hazy.  It's a lovely movie, BTW. LiPollis (talk) 22:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  In 1982, really? 

message: Djimon Hounsou, who was so memorable in this film, recently gave a joint interview with TMZ, the “Osservatore Romano”, and the “Svenskar Tageblatt” where he revealed that writer-director Jim Sheridan plagiarized the whole thing from a rather obscure but lovely Swedish film, and the cover-up made Hounsou realize he could get away with virtually any felony (be it arson, be it rape, be it felo-de-se) as long as he kept silent about the deal that was cut to ensure silence about how ignorant Hollywood studio heads and “power”-agents didn’t discover the one-hundred-percent plagiarism of the entire film from a Svensk original until AFTER this one had been nominated for Oscars.  Anyway, Hounsou claims in the interview that his silence about the whole sordid affair is the chief reason he isn’t in a prison or a modestly-priced receptacle today! 2603:8001:26F0:7F10:F564:5BAF:1100:4070 (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Djimon Hounsou Interview
Talk:Annapolis (2006 film)

message: The article appears to have been written by a very young child, or someone whose first language is not English.  I recommend thorough editing. I feel unable to do so as it often isn't clear what the writer was trying to say.JohnC (talk) 18:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Salesian School, Chertsey

message: This article seems to have been written by staff and students (or their parents). Descriptions of the students of this school as "talented" is out of place in an encyclopedia as are unsourced references to personal disputes between staff members. The article requires a significant re-write as most of the material here is irrelevant to an encyclopedia. The article also requires citation of sources for all significant statements. 
- DoktorDec (talk) 16:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV check and sources
Talk:Groudon

message: I personally feel that a big section telling someone how to beat Kyogre with Groudon doesn't exactly belong in the Groudon article. These are my changes. I hope nobody objects. I just feel that were you to look Groudon up in an encyclopedia (if it was actually in an paper encyclopedias, which I doubt), I can't believe you'd see a big paragraph about how a trainer can use Groudon to defeat Kyogre, even if the two are rivals. I believe more general battle tactics would be in there, if any battle tactics were even included in the article. Deskana (talk) 13:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup? 

message: Can somebody add the sixth picture here: http://www.serebii.net/movies/jirachi/groudon.shtml to the anime section?
Done. Nemu 00:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't that voilate copyrights? After all you found this from a website. TheBlazikenMaster 22:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:The Red Bulletin

message: Removed comment about 'distinguishing between fact and fiction'. The Red Bulletin is fact, so I have no idea what the problem is.
Please explain here how the entry needs to be improved and I'll do it. (Damian Corrigan)
It's taken verbatim from their own web site.  I don't know what Wikipedia's policy is on descriptions like that.  Personally I don't think there's anything wrong with doing that.  The problem with this article though is that it sounds too cheeky.  "State of the art" and "hard working" don't belong in there either.  (Ryan)
Does anyone know how to get a copy of this? If so, this should be added to the article The Dunnie 17:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Reflow soldering

message: How to adjust the reflow profile to prevent Lead free process 0402(inch) component tombstone?
What are the advantage and Disadvantage of 5 Zone Reflow and 10 zone Reflow  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.238.142.239 (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Katai Tayama

message: this is one of the few references I have found --Melaen 14:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I think a more detailed description of Tayama Katai can be found in the Japanese article 田山花袋. I'm no good at Japanese, so could anyone translate some information from the Japanese article to this one? -jayjay 13:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese article 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dslaym (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: JPN 351 The Japanese Experience of the Twentieth Century
Talk:GAA Interprovincial Championship

message: Wasn't this won by leinster? (Gnevin 14:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 

message: I'd suggest we move to Interprovincial Championship , railway cup is an old out of date name (Gnevin 14:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Moved

message: wiki has 44 munster wins 
 has 43
 has 45
wiki has 28 leinster wins
 has 27
 confirms that but isnt relieible
(Gnevin 01:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: N/B hoganstand has been changed since i highlighted it to them (Gnevin 18:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have changed to munster gaa for hurling and hoganstand for football (Gnevin 15:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know the Combined Universities team (basically a college All-Star team) used to enter the Railway Cup and they've definetly won it at least once (1973), look here under the Anthony McGurk section. Must be true because none of the provinces won it that year, yet no list seem to mention them. I wonder where we could get that info? Derry Boi (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 different site , 3 differents figures 
Talk:Marina Gershenovich

message: What could I add to the article to make the information more sufficient for those unfamiliar with the matter?--Levsha 14:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Josh Billings

message: Besides the fact that there are no references, I think the quotes don't belong here anyway. They should go to wikiquote's Josh Billings page. Probably a sample can be left here, such as the famed Disney quote, but then the rest should be moved with something like a "more" link for his wikiquote page. Any objections to this? MagnoliaSouth (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I removed the unsourced quotes and placed a link to the wikiquote page. Just in case anyone needs it, I am presently sorting the deleted quotes alphabetically and will post them to Josh Billings Deleted Quotes. This is so that they're not lost, just in case. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 16:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the quotes be at wikiquote? 

message: Google hits for Esek wins, and the 1888 edition of Century has it as well.--Lmstearn (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle Ezek? Uncle Esek?
File talk:Marctrain.jpg

message: I believe that this picture is incorrectly marked as having been taken at the Point of Rocks station.
* There is a decided curve in the tracks at Point of Rocks. These tracks are straight.
* No trains start at Point of Rocks, which is the only situation where the train would be sitting on the platform giving the conductors a chance to "chat". I can't find any evidence that that was ever different.
* The platform on the eastbound side is longer and the shelters are more spaced out at Point of Rocks
* There is no railing on the westbound platform at Point of Rocks. You would either see the station building or the tracks coming from the Frederick extension.
* The parking lot north of the tracks at Point of Rocks is further away than here
* On the far left of the picture is a sign stating the name of the station and the end point for trains using this platform. While it's not readable, it's obviously much shorter than "Point of Rocks".
I am almost 100% certain that this picture was actually taken at the Brunswick station.
* Trains start there, and the conductors stand on the platform while passengers board.
* The platform used in Brunswick is straight and short like this one, and the shelters match.
* The westbound platform has a railing just like this one, and the parking lot is just behind it.
* It does not resemble any other platforms between Brunswick and Rockville on the Brunswick line.
The only thing thing that gives me pause is I have not seen any of the stations in West Virginia. However, since I ride this train from Brunswick daily, I'm confident enough to change the text.
—Wrathchild (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Peggie Castle

message: It appears that the text of this article was taken almost verbatim from IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0145312/bio
Should the text be re-written, should an a citation be added, or should it be completely removed as a violation of copyright?  I know that the Wikipedia way is for me to "suck it up" and fix the article myself, but I must admit that I am not inspired; as such, I doubt the quality of the work would be very good if I took on this task. --Takeel 14:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  I've done a first pass rewrite to get past the copyvio.  I'll try to add to it to improve the article when I get a chance.  Wasted Time R 15:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripped from IMDB?
Template talk:Product-stub

message: Why does this stub message have a green copyright symbol as its image?  Perhaps a big unicode ™® would be better?  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?
Talk:Field marshal (Russian Empire)

message: Why not include demoted Field-Marshals? Kmorozov 14:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. If they ever held the rank of Field Marshal then they should be included. However, they should only be included if there are full details for them, not just a surname. -- Necrothesp 14:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I supplied a guiding link at the bottom of the page. --Ghirla | talk 15:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If existence of resource somewhere in internet is a reason for not include demoted Field-Marshals then it is a reason for not include any of them. Kmorozov 06:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's OK to name them when you have something more than just a surname. Also, I believe that redlinking is not very helpful. Let's start the article first and then provide links to it from other articles. Lists full of redlinks look slovenly to me. --Ghirla | talk 11:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Both of them has biographies, e.g. by Bantysh-Kamensky at  Kmorozov 11:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I have to say that whether you like red links or not is not very relevant, since many wikipedians are perfectly happy with them. -- Necrothesp 12:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 09:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demoted Field-Marshals 

message: The book Za víru, vládce a vlast (by czech military historian Jiří Fidler) states, that there were 72 general field marshals, not 64 (as it is in this article). Can I complete it, or not? --Silesianus (talk) 11:32, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete list?
Talk:Damnation (album)

message: On Opeth's first live DVD, Lamentations, Mikael Åkerfeldt notes after "Ending Credits" that the song is a ripoff from a song by Camel. However, he does not state which song, and a quick google search does not yield any result. More information about this for an extra note/trivia would be nice :). Jacob Kjær 02:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ending credits

message: Hi, I think acoustic should be removed as it is not a proper genre and is poorly sourced, the one source about.com is classed as an unreliable source and the other source which is reliable actually is a link to a different album Ghost Reveries, plus the album isn't really acoustic, what do you think? Lukejordan02 (talk) 23:50, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair, it was only decided to be unreliable a few months ago, and you're right, it does change rather often. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acoustic Genre 
Talk:Video Encoded Invisible Light

message: haha, "and broadcast flag on steroids"
who came up with that?
--207.75.132.64 14:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Pere Marquette Beach

message: I moved this information from Jacques Marquette, where it was off-topic. I can't verify the USA Today reference, nor am I sure that this information is encyclopedic. --ESP 14:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was incorrect - they merely reported that the beach had appeared on other lists of clean beaches, rather than performing surveys themselves. --Hut 8.5 12:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andy Panda

message: Is there a better image out there, where you can actually tell what the character looks like? Krychek 21:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say this one looks pretty good. http://lantz.goldenagecartoons.com/1940s/dogtax02.jpg What do you think. Magic-Man 10:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the best image 

message: Please vote on the talk page of the List of Fictional Pandas and save this page from extinction. Thank you. Das Baz, aka Erudil 15:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Save the Pandas

message: i have an original drawing. Toby tiche (talk) 14:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andy Panda
Talk:The Little Princess (1939 film)

message: IMHO, The Little Princess was Shirley Temple at her best in her best film.
Nodelink (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shirley Temple at her best in her best film 

message: Is there a reason why the actual film is not shown in the article? :File:The Little Princess (1939) full.ogv. It only seems appropriate to have the actual film in the article itself. --65.78.114.251 (talk) 07:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  full film 
Talk:Hare-um Scare-um

message: There is a lost ending to this cartoon and the blog entry that was posted by a animation historian. It is unacceptable for someone like this user to remove a section that featured a blog entry from a well-known historian, which featured scenes from the ending. Here's what the user did. StevenMario (talk) 02:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you'll find that policies about questionable sources, such as blogs, expressly allow users to remove material they don't find credible. And you have to admit, with your spotty record on sourcing, many editors will, and have, found your additions lacking. Wazowski was perfectly within his rights to remove what he did. As I've tried to stress over and over the last few days, learn the rules around here. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 06:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

text: You may think so, but if blog entrees are by someone well-known (for example Lee Unkrich's Twitter blog), then it is considered reliable StevenMario (talk) 23:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost ending

message: Who is responsible for removing the subject of the Lost Ending? As soon as the bunnies appear after the hunter say, "I can whip you, and your whole family!", There is a cut from the original print and this was shown to audiences in 1939.A film historian archived the ending from an original print, which the ending clearly showing the hunter being beaten up by bunnies every where. People who visit this article is supposed to know the TRUE Ending.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramadya26 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost Ending
Talk:Prest-O Change-O

message: The trivia section was a mess.  It looked like someone made a comment, and someone else made a counter comment.
The comment had to do with cartoons where Bugs Bunny, or a prototype were defeated.  The first sentence of the trivia section claimed that this was the only cartoon Bugs had been defeated.  
As I recall, Bugs Bunny has been defeated more than once.  He was killed in What's Opera Doc.  He was beaten in cartoon remakes of the tortoise and the hare story.
So I am killing the trivia comment in toto.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.201.190 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted Trivia Section

message: This YouTube version contains closed captions and an interactive transcript. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDGWBtf9q_Q
I believe it has merit but should not post it as I am the creator.
Please evaluate. Thanks CartoonChick (talk) 04:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 
Talk:The Saint in London

message: According to previous edits of this article, Leslie Charteris did not like this film, and was also upset with RKO's handling of the character. I have removed this unsourced statement as the definitive history of The Saint by Burl Barer states otherwise, that Charteris felt this was the best RKO film. If he had concerns about RKO's overall handling of the character, this information belongs in other articles anyway. 23skidoo 18:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion of the film
Talk:A Walk in the Sun (1945 film)

message: I removed this paragraph, which is both opinion and added nothing to the synopsis:
Compared to later "realistic" war movies centering on the personalities in an Army platoon in combat, 'A Walk in the Sun' comes off as a shlocky government-approved Hollywood propaganda or an Army training film.   Which was it was both; filmed on an obvious California backlot with studio contact actors who complained only mildly about army life. They always carried standard field pack complete with entrenching tool and also, they always wore helmet chin straps per regulations.
The director -- Lewis Milestone -- is famous for his anti-war stance (c.f. his All Quiet on the Western Front and Pork Chop Hill), so no matter what the Army's assistance on the picture was, trying to claim this was a propaganda film (made while the war was still going on, mind you) is doing both Milestone and the movie an injustice. (Ironically, he did work on actual Army training films during WWI.)
Besides, characters often relaxed with their helmets off, always a no-no in combat situations. ;)
--Robert Daeley (talk) 11:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion paragraph removed from synopsis 

message: I am just wondering how this sentence could be improved so that it makes sense:
"The film was released in June 1946 to critical and popular acclaim but also a strong critique of the film from director Samuel Fuller, which he sent in the form of a letter to Milestone."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.195.131 (talk) 20:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical sentence 

message: The synopsis is almost word by word the one on this site https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/94993/a-walk-in-the-sun/#synopsis but it contains no footnote. 
I noticed this after I edited it down a little. I'll appreciate some guidance on what's appropriate here. 
Emile Blondet (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Confessions of a Nazi Spy

message: In the phrase "first blatantly anti-Nazi film produced by a major Hollywood studio prior to World War II.", what's the purpose of the phrase "prior to World War II"?  That's redundant information.
There should be a citation to Nazi Spies in America by FBI Agent Leon G. Turrou. NY: Random House, 1938, 1939, since the movie is based upon his series of articles which became this book and upon the book itself.
You may also wish to note the below link
http://antipolygraph.org/articles/article-027.shtml
rumjal 16:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Print references
Talk:Minor term

message: The previous definition was incorrect.
the Minor term is the subject of the conclusion and the subject of the minor premise, not the predicate.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.102.143.2 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 25 January 2006
:That's correct on its placement in the conclusion, however the minor term need not be the subject of the minor premise (as in Figures 3 and 4). —Mrwojo (talk) 20:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Old definition