Talk:Erotic humiliation

message: * DON'T MERGE but DO LINK: A humiliatrix is a woman whom engages in the sexual humiliation of her partner.  She may also be paid to do so.  
* Yeah. Sure. I say merge 'em.
* DON'T MERGE - I believe Humiliatrix should be considered a seperate entity away from the umbrella term that is erotic humiliation, in the same manner that dominatrix and BDSM should be treated seperately.  It should be considered that a Humiliatrix is also a slang term for women whose personality naturally finds itself humiliating others in RL without any exchange of money or erotic implication, thus rendering erotic humiliation a dubious alternative.  ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.40.187 (talk • contribs) 
* Merge. Fits in perfectly — basicly a female humiliator, and the list of associated sexual interests listed in this article are consistent those under Humiliatrix. Non-BDSM uses of the term Humiliatrix are almost certainly using the BDSM term metaphorically, so I don't think that disqualifies the merge. Please do include a redirect from  Humiliatrix. –edgarde 03:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Humiliatrix]] merge 

message: I'm not sure "consent" covers it.  Most humiliation is consensual.  Maybe these two should be converged.
Where consent is not mutual, surely this becomes rape. Two people, equally attracted to the concept of domination and submission (assuming one to be the sub and the other to be the dom)will feel their own sense of eroticism. As a male sub, I welcome the attention of a female dom, but not in the sense that I should come away bleeding. Humiliation, saliva showers, golden shower, anal penetration and spanking all form part of my fantasy role playing and consent is a given under suitable circumstances. If at any time I chose to withhold my consent but was forced into any of those scenarios I would consider it sexual assault as would any woman who would normally participate as a sub, but who chose to say no on occasions for reasons personal to her.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.56.19.46 (talk) 11:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, erotic humiliation is sexual humiliation which results in gratification for the humiliated person. If it's not erotic for them, then it's merely sexual humiliation, without any erotic component. Note that humiliation need not necessarily have any physical component. -- The Anome (talk) 22:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diff between erotic and sexual humiliation? 

message: Did the author mean to say "pubic" instead of "public"? Taxwoman 20:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freudian slip? 

message: I have merged the two articles Sexual humiliation and Humiliation (BDSM), and imported the talk page of both here. The text from the latter was probably superior but I've retained most of both, adding a structure and other information. I have kept the article under the name "Sexual humiliation" since that's a broader title.
FT2 17:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MERGE

message: I have renamed this article "erotic humiliation" from "sexual humiliation", since this article is about sexual humiliation in a consensual erotic context. Sexual humiliation in other contexts is a very different thing, and not even remotely erotic. -- Karada 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed article to "erotic humiliation" 

message: That a person must have some serious underlying psychological issues if they enjoy being humiliated to a rather extreme extent, such as in many of the examples cited in the article. 70.29.250.165 (talk) 13:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you really have to wonder. Most people into this type of stuff, as well as BDSM in general, probably have some form of mental illness and/or were sexually abused as children. Much of it is very dark and even painful (literally). I'm not sure how a sane functioning person could be into fetishes that are this bizarre and extreme.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.152.149 (talk) 01:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a page for contemplating the morality or mental state of those that practice the subject of the article. Please keep the discussion to the editing, improvement, and expansion of the article. If the information you are describing comes from a reliable source, please add it to the article and cite it properly.  12.220.128.10 (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  At what point does one wonder 

message: The 'psychology' section has nothing in it about the actual psychology of humiliation - i.e. how we are to understand it psychologically. What motivates the desires and fantasies, what function do they serve, why it should be that humiliation or pain etc are arousing. It would be really helpful if someone could add something on this!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.191.125 (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychology of humiliation fantasies 

message: Just curious about if there are people into this that are into it for purely financial reasons, not anything sexual. 
The article states:
-Money slavery, in which the submissive must buy the dominant gifts and pay the dominant's bills and taxes
-Homework slavery, in which the submissive must do the dominant's homework or occupational work
Sounds like an easy way for women to take advantage of guys who are dumb enough to be into this stuff and use them solely for financial gain. 24.90.152.149 (talk) 01:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-sexual Reasons 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 04:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: the picture is pornographic i agree with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Community_Tech_bot
that
* https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piss_drinking.png 
must be removed as fast as possible thank you  Ravinesh rds (talk) 13:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Community Tech bot is not a user, it is an automated process (a "bot") informing users here that there was a deletion discussion taking place over at Commons, which is where the image is hosted. If you click on the link in the post by Community Tech bot, you will see that the image was nominated for deletion, but that the discussion resulted in it being kept. What you can do is initiate a discussion on this page about whether the image is necessary for this particular article on English Wikipedia. I have no opinion on that subject. (I have moved your signature from the heading to the post itself, on multiple talk pages – please don't sign the heading.) --bonadea contributions talk 18:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  a pretty pornographic kind of image is shown here 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion