Template talk:Parables of Jesus

message: current problem: There are two parables involving fig trees: The Parable of the Fig Tree is found in , , ; the Parable of the Barren Fig Tree is found in . 75.0.4.217 09:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's split the Fig Tree page into Parable of the Fig Tree (the parable that Jesus told) and Jesus and the Fig Tree (the incident in Jesus' life). Jonathan Tweet 00:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The fig tree

message: Can we change this page to "Lazarus and the rich man"? Jonathan Tweet 00:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lazarus and Dives"? 

message: Why is the Good Shepherd on this list? Doesn't seem like the article, nor sources, back it up. -Andrew c [talk] 15:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good shepherd? Where did you see that? History2007 (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh! But I'm curious why Parable of the Growing Seed and Parable of the Hidden Treasure were removed as well.-Andrew c [talk] 16:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed? They are there... History2007 (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Shepherd 

message: The Grain of Wheat used to be in the parable category, but wasn't on the template. I've changed that, but now I'm coming here to see if anyone thinks it should be in the disputed John list or not? -Andrew c [talk] 14:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing in the article to suggest it's a parable, so I'd say don't include it. -- Radagast3 (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me fix your sentence: There's nothing in the article. We should be going by what sources say, not what a terribly written, sorry excuse for an "article" says ;) I strongly feel that Wikipedia should not be Wikisource. It shouldn't be a place to just quote the bible. While it may be possible (well, I know it's possible) to write an encyclopedia article on the topic, I have half a mind to nominate that article for deletion, or prod it... or open some of my books and expand it myself :) Oh, sorry for the rant, what were you say? -Andrew c [talk] 15:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What I meant was, the article lists no sources suggesting it's a parable (indeed, as you point out, the article lists no sources at all). Perhaps somebody will expand it into a decent article eventually. -- Radagast3 (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Grain of Wheat

message: The image on the miracles template now looks bright & matches the blue background. The Rembrandt here is dark, depressing and just does not seem to work. Any better suggestions? History2007 (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How about the Good Samaritan? -- Radagast3 (talk) 09:48, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Let's try that then. -- Radagast3 (talk) 13:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. And it is one of the best known parables anyway, so works well. History2007 (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it really had to be an image from one of the well-known parables. -- Radagast3 (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image on Parables vs Miracles

message: :vi:Bản mẫu:Dụ ngôn của Chúa Giê-xu? Newone (talk) 09:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viwiki