lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sung Wong Toi

message: The inscription of the stone marks it was made in Qing dynasty.  Is the inscription really the one made in Song dynasty?  — HenryLi (Talk) 11:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Year?

message: Matthew hk argued in this and 
this edit that the park will be relocated. The source he quoted got nothing about relocation. It only says part of the new development area will be designated part of the park. It is not known from the source he quoted whether the existing park will be preserved or designated for other use(s). I'd suggest taking out that whole paragraph altogether until we figured out what exactly would happen. 1.64.46.31 (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mind to just search the news article/press release yourself? This links are about the Sung Wong Toi rock / park/ garden will be once again relocated. https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr19-20/chinese/fc/pwsc/papers/p19-27c.pdf https://www.news.gov.hk/isd/ebulletin/tc/category/infrastructureandlogistics/051109/html/051109tc06002.htm Matthew hk (talk) 16:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  This PWSC paper got nothing about the relocation. You may also be interested to take a look at paragraph 34.2 of this document. The 2005 plan may no longer be valid. 1.64.46.31 (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind to rewording to there was a plan to relocate the garden/park to past tense or state this may be not yet (never/really ) happens. Matthew hk (talk) 09:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

text: While for the legco document: it is the item "29. Reprovisioning and Improvement of Sung Wong Toi Playground", in Chinese they uses 重置. And the CEDD map https://www.ktd.gov.hk/eng/programmeandprogress.html indicate the new site is inside Kai Tak not at the edge. But on the same website the item is under "(3) Under Planning and Design: Former North Apron area". Matthew hk (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

text: Enlarged map. https://www.ktd.gov.hk/photo/programme/Program%20&%20Progress%20Map.pdf Matthew hk (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  The PWSC paper actually referred under item no. 29 to the Sung Wong Toi Playground, which is adjacent to Sung Wong Toi Garden. (And that new park as appeared on the plan is very close to the edge if not immediately on the edge, iff that's going to be relevant.) 1.64.46.31 (talk) 19:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you got no further point to add, please take out that paragraph until you are able to locate reliable sources for what you claimed. In the meantime how that could be reworded may be deliberated here. 1.64.46.31 (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sung Wong Toi Park
Talk:Henry Pochin

message: I've added some information about Pochin's involvement with the clay industry, as well as a few interesting facts including the tramway and gothers works. To put him into context I've added the complete story on how Pochin's clay company would eventually form part of what is now the worlds largest clay producer. --Badharlick 11:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a few things
Talk:Government Laboratory High School

message: I have started this page. Please do help to edit and enrich the contents of this page.
"This public school is regarded as the best in Bangladesh" do you have any sources to cite for this, or is it just POV? Also can you sign your posts with four tildes! Thanks! LookingYourBest 07:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: This article has been annoying me for such a long time! I've just had a go at re-writing the majority of it, which has included removing some of the unsourced stuff! Can someone cast an eye over it and change any obvious mistakes? I expect somewill will have a go at reverting all my hard work! Ha ha! --LookingYourBest (talk) 18:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete Re-Write 

message: Is this school is really public, or is it government? Tanvir 11:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public or Goverment? 

message: I just removed the yearly result view (i.e. list of students who was in the merit list in past years). That are not encyclopedic. So, please do not include them again. Tanvir 15:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yearly results review
Talk:Polly (Nirvana song)

message: I just watched the Classic Albums documentary about Nevermind. In it, Charles R. Cross and Krist Novoselic recount the story of the inspiration for Polly. On the article here, a date of 1987 is mentioned. However, in the documentary, a paper clipping is shown on screen, from the Washington News, with a date of March 17th 2000. Cross goes on to state the incident took place at the Community World Theatre. Of course, it's entirely possible the clipping was for some reason running a follow-up, or that the clipping was mocked-up by the documentary team to add a visual element. --GetThePapersGetThePapers 11:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :"Polly" was recorded in the key of E minor with the chords E5-G5-D5-C5 for all verses and then the chords D5-C5-G5-B♭5 for all choruses.
Who wrote that crap? All chords have fifths in them. And the chords cited are not played with fifth inversions. And if the piece is performed in E minor then where are the bloody minor chords? Herp derp! Perhaps the tween writing this nonsense can grow up a bit before contributing to Wikipedia again and can perhaps remove this embarrassment for the betterment of the site.
- -
I don't think there is anything incorrect here. It sounds like the key of Em to me. All of these chords are in the key of Em save B♭ which does sound dissonant in the song. Further there are other things that can help distinguish what key a song is in beyond the chords.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.166.50.4 (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Composition

message: Why is it a "narrative flourish" that Cobain has the girl escape ? I just saw the Classic Albums doco again and it asserts that this element is true in the real-life incident and was what inspired Cobain about the story in the 1st place. Should we delete the suggestion that this is some of kind of clever twist that he has added as that's my reading of what these words imply -Sticks66 04:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative Flourish ? 

message: I know, I know, it's NIRVANA. But I feel this is just being called grunge and/or alternative in both the present and past on here because of the name NIRVANA. But, when you think about it, it sounds more like a folk (or folk rock at least) song. Acoustic guitar, non-angst-filled lyrics, no distortion, no heaviness, and so-on. Think about it, does it sound closer to a Bob Dylan song, or a Mudhoney song?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheezer Rox (talk • contribs) 00:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folk/folk rock? 

message: The page had been completely vandalised with made up content/original research, no citations.
Cleaned up. DanTheShrew (talk) 19:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism deleted 

message: What's the connection to Public Enemy's Pollywanacraka, which came the year before. More inspiration to Nirvana? --Elmeter (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Enemy
Talk:Berserk

message: 'If you "want to keep track of things" here click on the "watch" link at the top of the page...' the wikipedia "watchlist" isn't something I check every day, I'm sorry to say (it's not a very convient feature).... so, who here is liking the abusive admin or the linkspam? Told you so ;P ... expect lots of redirecting to berserker like back in late 2004... of course, at least then the disambig served as a getto version of Category:Berserk, but that's another story...  -Aknorals 10:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excessive negativity and doomsdaying never helped anything. This was the best way out of a deadlocked debate and it got rid of the absurd Berserk-->Berserker redirect, and on wikipedia compromise is preferable to absolute loss. Besides, did you just notice this now? It's been like this for a while.--tjstrf 10:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was joking there. I actually find it rather amusing to see you guys clean up after this: seems approperate in my mind.  And keep in mind that berserk --> berserk (disambiguation) is also absurd, and the result of the same admin (who, last time I checked, still hasn't listed a reason for his actions on his talk page). -Aknorals 11:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if you check the edit history, you'll notice that he kept redirecting it to Berserker. I managed to get it 3RR trapped at the current state, and the admin moved on to other debates. That's quite an effective tactic, actually, though it may be systemic abuse, not sure. Most editors have better things to do than wait 24 hours just to revert a page again. --tjstrf 11:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um.. when did I say I didn't check the edit history? I saw it on the 30th (or was it the 31st), when I got home and the power was on in my house. Between power outages, work, and sleep, it may become difficult at times to edit. -Aknorals 11:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

text: "Besides, did you just notice this now? It's been like this for a while." What's been like how for a while? -Aknorals 11:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Stoke Newington Church Street

message: The introduction to creating a first page says not to worry about being bold/rubbish, anybody can come along and edit. I also hope the commercial aspects, important to the street is not construed a blatant plug. JK
:I wouldn't think so, food and shopping being so central to the character of the street. I imagine some may take issue with the naming of particular businesses though (for example, it's already out of date on Yum Yum's, which I fixed, that having moved to the High Street). Me, I don't care too much, it can easily get out of date is all. I do wonder about it being the longest street name in London, I hadn't heard that before (and I live nearby), trying to think of a way of verifying it. Anyway, will be adding a pic shortly, and maybe a few more words on buildings. Tarquin Binary 01:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Beck, William, A description of Church Street, Stoke Newington, with unsigned introduction dated 1927, Clapham: Edgar Publishing, n.d., p.12
as mentioned in 
STOKE NEWINGTON QUAKERS - EARLY HISTORY
Quakers in Stoke Newington 
Part 1: to the mid-nineteenth century 
here.
BrainyBabe (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  source
Category talk:School massacres

message: Above is a suggestion to rename this category (and the relevant subcategories) from "School massacres" to "School spree shootings". I agree with this, with the caveat that the Beslan school hostage crisis and the Ma'alot massacre and the Bath School disaster and the Poe Elementary School Attack and the Cologne School Massacre and the Osaka school massacre are not technically spree shootings, as they either did not involve guns (instead using bombs, knives, flamethrowers, or lances), or (Beslan and Ma'alot) are better characterised as hostage/terrorist situations. Also, Santee, California and Bethel, Alaska are temporary placeholders as the relevant school shooting articles haven't been written (see [ and  for details). If I have time, I'll tidy this up and do suitable renamings if needed. Carcharoth 12:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this works, because of the counterexamples you mention (killings that aren't shootings).  Instead, I propose renaming to :Category:Massacres at educational institutions.  The purpose of this is to pave the way for putting :Category:University shootings (or a similar cat, because currently University shootings is for killings and shootings that don't kill) in a subcategory of the new cat.  In the UK, universities aren't considered schools, but they are educational institutions.  See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_April_28#Category:School_massacres. Superm401 - Talk 01:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename from "massacres" to "spree shootings"
Talk:Dennis Waterman

message: The article says he has two children by his first wife, Penny, yet if you follow the link to his second wife's Patricia's page it says there that they had two children.  So one page or the other is wrong.  -- Ralph Corderoy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ralph Corderoy (talk • contribs) 11:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: that made me laugh, should probably be changed back though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valerieg (talk • contribs) 20:40, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'what a midget'

message: Just popped in to state that Waterman also played in The_Life_and_Loves_of_a_She-Devil - the BBC version. 
Made a change for the sake of clarity (it confuses Waterman having daughters with his own daughter by the change of subject).
"Hannah also has appeared in New Tricks. She appears thinking the Dennis Waterman character is her father which he turns out not to be in a secret paternity test he arranges, but tells her she is. She finds out the truth, but he does take on a father figure role." <--what does this all mean. To me it is incomprehensible. 
--Candy (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Further work'

message: I've been a long-time fan of Minder and Waterman, so, in the Little Britain cariciture section is said that there was 'citation needed' for the title songs (reportedly four), that he he has sung. I referenced 'On the Up' and 'Stay Lucky'. It is well-known that he sang the 'Minder' opening and the 'New Tricks' opening but I did not reference those - is this a problem? They should be easy to reference but I am a bit sleepy now, maybe someone else could do it? Mondegreen de plume (talk) 04:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title songs 

message: Is Waterman really five foot nine? He looked shorter than John Thaw in "The Sweeney". (92.7.29.234 (talk) 11:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: There really should be a discography section added, on the lines that is usual for music artists on Wikipedia.
Amazon and Discogs show the following releases:
;Albums
* 1977 Down Wind Of Angels (DJM)
* 1977 Waterman (DJM)
* 1980 So Good For You (EMI)
;Singles
* 1976 "For Their Pleasure" (DJM)
* 1977 "It Ain't Easy" (DJM)
* 1979 "I Could Be So Good For You" (with The Dennis Waterman Band) (EMI)
* 1979 "Love's Left Me Bleeding" (EMI)
* 1980 "Wasn't Love Strong Enough" (EMI)
* 1981 "Come Away With Me" (EMI)
* 1982 "Shake The City" (EMI)
* 1982 "We Don't Make Love On Sundays" (C&D)
* 1983 "What Are We Gonna Get 'Er Indoors" (with George Cole) (EMI)
Skinsmoke (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So, why don't you add it?  Be bold.  Also review MOS:TITLE: the titles of albums are italicized and the titles of songs go in "quotations".  Try to find a better site that Amazon, like Allrovi/allmusic. > Best O Fortuna (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Talk:Queenadreena

message: Nearly identical to Queen_Adreena. There is also an discussion on merge/redirect. I will do this in a couple of days if no one opposes. Ruben 11:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Still doesn't resolve the issue of the spelling, especially when factoring in that it is split as two words on the Taxidermy release. --69.208.131.161 16:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here Sometime ago I went and asked them. Their manager confirmed it to be QueenAdreena. Also, from my understanding they had to change their name from two words to one when they switch labels some time ago. - ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 22:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Garside has released a record under the name Liar, flower and has gone on record saying that it is unlikely she would participate in any reunion activities. I’m not referencing the band, as there is a link to Garside’s bio page. HeyHeyHayden (talk) 20:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liar, flower and Garside POV
Talk:Lord Chancellor of Scotland

message: The Archibald Campbell, 2nd Earl of Argyll article says that he "eventually rose to the position of Lord High Chancellor of Scotland." But he is not listed here. Anybody got the answer? --Mais oui! 11:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the statement is properly sourced why not add him? In addition, there seem to be a number of Lord Chancellors on this page  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Chancellor_of_Scotland who do not appear on the graphic. David Lauder 18:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Pete Winkelman

message: There appears to be a conflict of evidence about this.  Can anyone clarify? --Concrete Cowboy 12:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've decided to comment it out since no information about Bronze Records mentions it and the only source is a  personal website.  It can go back in if a further citation can be provided. --Concrete Cowboy 17:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bronze Records
Talk:Denise Bode

message: For a start, "only the second woman to serve as a commissioner" is a bit meaningless. Commissioner of what? How many are there? Is this a technical term in Oklahoma? If it is a major state-wide office, and there is only one of them in the state, that should suffice for notability. If there are 100 or more at a time, I suggest it is not notable. --Brownlee 12:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't say that the edits to the article since I posted this comment leave me any the wiser. --Brownlee 11:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks to the anon editor from Oklahoma.  I'd say touch and go on notability.--Brownlee 11:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Berserk (manga)/Archive 3

message: Below is the first attempt to move the article that is currently located at Berserk (manga) back to Berserk, where it had been from early Jan. 2005 to early May 2006, when an admin moved it, and listed no reason.  To see a more detailed... tail on how this article moved around a lot before January 2005 (or how it will continue to move around a lot and cause edit wars untill someone finaly moves it back to Berserk, at which time it will probably be safe for another year and a half), see the top of the page currently located at Talk:Berserk (manga), although I imagine it may, if admins move it, be located at Talk:Berserk (series), Talk:Berserk (anime), Talk:Berserk (anime and manga series), or perhaps, if you are lucky, simply "Talk:Berserk".  I have also listed my comments regarding this mess there as well. --Aknorals 12:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus. —Nightstallion (?) 09:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archival note
Talk:Dead Bishop

message: this is just an outline of what happens in the sketch... frankly, i feel this category is redundant, as very few of the pages actually talk about underlying meanings in the sketches, or give any extra trivia. 
and this sketch probably doesn't have any underlying meaning... so it's a little pointless. riana 12:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Oops! Someone has forgotten the business about identifying bishops - as in: "It's tattooed on the back of the neck". (If only it were always that easy ...) Hair Commodore (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tattooing 

message: The phrase is linked to "Social responsibility", whose title suggests that it could be appropriate but which actually is gloriously irrelevant. I'm therefore removing the link. I've a hunch that "Society is to blame" deserves, if not its own article, then at least a redirect somewhere -- but I don't know where. Hoary (talk) 06:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Society is to blame"
Talk:Borough of Waverley

message: I am not sure that that epithet is correct - the Weald proper lies to the south, yes, but I doubt if too much of this borough is actually within the Weald. I think most of it lies on the Lower Greensand vale - called the Vale of Homesdale in Kent Peter Shearan (talk) 15:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A "Wealden" Borough?

message: Page doesn't seem to follow wikipedia convention for English boroughs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.40.110 (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  should be Waverly_(borough) title instead? 

message: "...when one such Bishop, Henry of Winchester and of Blois established Farnham Castle as the See's episcopal home but which is today the borough's main surviving castle and a museum to the period."
This is one of many examples in articles about this part of Surrey in which sentences have been untidily cobbled together. The ideas would make more sense had they been expressed separately.
"...when one such Bishop, Henry of Winchester and of Blois, established Farnham Castle as the See's episcopal home. Today Farnham Castle is the borough's main surviving medieval edifice and acts as a museum for the period."
--Oldontarian (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Man turns into castle! 
Talk:Bibi de Vries

message: I have corrected and adapted this page to great lenght. There were several incorrect facts posted here:
* the VVD is a liberal party, not a centrist party
* She is NOT the vice president of the VVD, nor has she ever been the vice president. In my knowledge, such position doesn't even excist in this party.
* She was the vice-chairman of the lower house (not lower chamber :s) VVD fraction, but resigned several months ago.
I've expanded and added to this page, with most information coming from her own website, and the dutch www.parlement.com website (features extensive background information on most dutch politicians).
Regards, Mobylon 12:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:Huhu beetle

message: 2nd Author-
I live in NZ and have personally tried a huhu grub. Don't try one!!
They don't taste like buttery chicken, or peanuts, or butter (the rumours I heard before trying one), they taste very plain and crunchy.
Please, for your sake, don't try one!
------------
Seconded.  It was gross.  I'm still glad I ate it though. 203.118.158.142 10:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eating

message: If a cite could be found, those of us on other continents could get more out of this article if it included the typical adult's size.  If the larva is 70 mm (that's 2 3/4 inches, folks!) how big do the actual beetles get???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.170.41.254 (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The size of the adult beetle varies; males  are somewhat smaller than females, and sometimes you can find really big ones, sometimes quite small. I've seen large ones up to about 50mm length, some smaller males are barely 30mm. That's not including the antennae or legs. 
Edaemus (talk) 04:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Size
Talk:Borsad

message: <Post by 59.95.201.240 moved from article page to this page by Franamax (talk) 22:24, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you are allowed! Please provide sources for your additions though, so that other editors can verify the facts. Franamax (talk) 22:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Borsad