lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-24 Beard Picture

message: Hi,
I don't quite understand where I'm supposed to leave my comments regarding this action against me so I'll start here. I'll gladly move them to the appropriate spot as soon as someone lets me know what that might be. 
First of all, I think it is unfortunate that such an issue is being taken up against me. I believe this will ultimately be a waste of time as I've done nothing wrong. I believe the user is unilaterally attempting to impose their definition of beauty on the article in question, rather than attempting to increase the quality of wikipedia. I believe that I am increasing the quality of wikipedia through my actions by reverting edits to the article that remove a high quality photograph. The photograph in question is of me, I've never denied that fact. In fact, I've made that painfully obvious the entire time. I am not aware of any rule that says one can not place a photograph of themselves in an article if the photograph is contextual, which mine is. 
On several occasions I have reverted edits that removed my picture. I've done this each time because I believe that removing a high quality photograph, suitable for print, lowers the quality of wikipedia. In this instance the user is not even replacing the photograph with another. The user who removed the photograph (and whom I believe has started this case against me) has engaged in personal attacks (referring to my photograph as disgusting) as well as accusing me of having an agenda which I do not posses. 
I believe that bringing this up for any form of dispute resolution is a premature action since I'm attempting to use the talk page to form a consensus as to whether the photograph should remain or not. Currently one user believes the photograph should be removed, while two more (myself included) believe it should stay. Informally I have already joined the wikipedia IRC channel for some feedback in this matter. The IRC channel agreed that my photograph should remain. The use of the mediation process in leu of using the talk page is an unfortunate waste of time for all parties involved. Triddle 01:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Let's Go Away for Awhile

message: this isn't simple pop music, this is baroque pop  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.48.235 (talk) 20:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pop music 

message: Isn't it supposed to be Let's Go Away For Awhile?--Ilovetopaint (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Greg Alexander

message: Greg Alexander cannot possibly be born on 1940 - can someone find the appropriate info?--Alexio 01:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth?
Talk:Francisco de Montejo

message: The collapse of time and space in the 2nd to last paragraph is confusing.  In addition:
- The spaniard Rodrigo Ruiz was responsible for the killing of Lempira, not Francisco de Montejo.  See the Achivo General de Indias Patronato 69, or the transcription of it published in Los últimos Días de Lempira by Mario Felipe Martínez Castillo (2000).     
- What is the region refered to in the phrase "the most powerful king of that region, Tutulxin"?
- There is no mention of his rivalry with Pedro de Alvarado over the governorship of Honduras.  See Robert Chamerberlain:  The Conquest and Colonization of Honduras (1953) for details of the rivalry, and also his Conquest and Colonization of Yucatan.
- No mention of his multiple unsuccessful campaigns to conquer Yucatan, which his son succeded in conquering in the 1540s.
- Olancho is in eastern Honduras, which becomes part of the Audiencia of Los Confines, and then Guatemala more recently in time.
Appleton's is not a good source for this entry.
Rsheptak 20:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All very valid observations, and agreed that Appleton's is generally a poor resource to draw information from. If you've the refs to hand then by all means you'd be most welcome to make any necessary changes, or at least to correct the most egrarious errors and omissions. Unfortunately articles in this general topical area are ill-attended to at present, and it may take quite a while otherwise for improvements to be made.--cjllw | TALK 00:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review comments
Talk:Juan de Grijalva

message: According to Spanish Wikipedia and this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potonch%C3%A1n#Arrival_of_Juan_de_Grijalva_in_1518
Grijalva arrived on June 8 at Tabasco.
JFCochin (talk) 15:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabasco
Talk:Do It Again (The Beach Boys song)

message: The text said the single version of "Do It Again" appears on the 1993 Good Vibration box. It doesn't; it's definitely the LP (rechanneled stereo) version on the box. I have removed this reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pobbard (talk • contribs) 19:25, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Vibrations: Thirty Years of the Beach Boys 

message: I don't think so ? Bon Scott would turn in his grave. Sticks66 12:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Allmusic begs to differ. yeepsi (Time for a chat?/OVAR 9000!) 12:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Right then, Hard Rock it must be. From now on I'll think of Do It Again & the Beach Boys in the same vein as Aerosmith, The Foo Fighters, Alice in Chains and Van Halen. That bit about Air sampling the drum beat from Do It Again is particularly convincing !!Sticks66 12:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification "Hard Rock" ? 
Talk:Prude

message: ----
I think it[the page]'s fine.--Almighty Rajah 01:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is not fine, and has grammar errors on it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.86.50 (talk) 03:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

text: You're right, and thanks. -- œ™ 03:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this belong in Wiktionary? While yes, some words can stay in Wikipedia because they have a large enough influence on other things and aren't just a word, I think this page should probably be removed. 68.50.116.194 (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existence of Wiktionary
Talk:Never Learn Not to Love

message: Provided cite for this claim https://www.allmusic.com/song/never-learn-not-to-love-mt0014981962 only list two bootlegs and two editions of an one various artist psych compilation (Ah Feel Like Ahcid (24 American Psychedelic Artefacts From The EMI Vaults) ) - doesn't list it as appearing on any offical Beach Boys compilations. 
According to the listings on discogs apart from the lp & cd releases twofer releases that combined their album 20/20 with other Beach Boys' albums the only Beach Boys compilations it appeared on are two obscure records from 1980 & 1983 (The Capitol Years & The Beach Boys story).
109.144.218.0 (talk) 09:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   Throughout the years, "Never Learn Not to Love" has appeared on several other Beach Boys compilations and bootlegs.[24]
Talk:I Can Hear Music

message: The record image clearly credits only "Jeff Barry" as the composer.  Is there a cite for the authorship given in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.202.33.17 (talk) 04:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship
Talk:All I Want to Do (The Beach Boys song)

message: I removed this suggested merge label as these songs are totally different songs. One is written by Dennis Wilson and Stephen Kalinich (for the 20/20 album) and one was written by Brian Wilson and Mike Love (for the Sunflower album).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.104.199.61 (talk) 10:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge with [[All I Wanna Do (Beach Boys song)]] 

message: Apparently, one can hear a LOT more than just music on that B side! There was some "hanky panky" going on in the studio and it got picked up!Snopes even confirmed it somewhat http://www.snopes.com/risque/tattled/alliwant.asp  Question is: how to add it to the page as I think this is an interesting point for this specific song.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.30.124 (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Irony of using All I want to do as the B side for I can hear music
Talk:Susie Cincinnati

message: I read somewhere this was based on a real taxi driver the band met on a tour.  Anyone have link to that? 108.202.33.17 (talk) 04:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration?
Talk:HMS Irresistible (1898)

message: Here's a puzzler for you all.  At this Canadian site is a photo from the HMCS Niobe ca 1914-1915, showing three men, one wearing an Irresistible cap tally.  Was Irresistible perhaps with the RN's 4th Cruiser Squadron in 14/15 doing contraband patrols off New York?LeadSongDog 19:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Shoplifters of the World Unite

message: This claim has been in the article without a citation for some time.  Unless a reference can be provided, I reckon it should be removed. Madashell 01:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ayn Rand/We The Living
Talk:Air Academy High School

message: Should schools have a wikipedia article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.58.187.124 (talk • contribs).
:Well, there are numerous ideas about whether schools should be able to have their own Wikipedia article. You can find out more at the proposed policy/guideline WP:SCHOOLS. — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 01:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: High schools of this nature are generally notable, so I'm considering removing the CSD tag. --  dhp1080 (u·t·c) 23:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

text: If you were notable, you would have signed this post. Chris 22:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Where is the source for the part about the beer pong? The link in the References section is broken. Bradj47 (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just vandalism and I've removed it.  Thanks for pointing it out!  --ElKevbo (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer Pong?
Talk:HMS Bulwark (1899)

message: Are these coordinates right? That's a long way from Sheerness. DoctorKubla (talk) 07:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Coordinates changed. Clankypup (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Commission of H.M.S. Bulwark: Mediterannean Station, 1902-1905. Parsecboy (talk) 13:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for later 

message: This action - in 2008 - must have been prompted by something? What do the sources say, and can an involved editor expand that section with some details? 50.111.12.90 (talk) 21:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a war grave.  741 men were lost and some or all of their bodies lie within the designated site.  Salving and burial are not feasible, so they lie where they fell in the service of their country.  Pretty obvious really, would you appreciate someone digging up a relative's corpse?  It's covered by the citation at the sentence end so I'm removing the "Why?" tag.  Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  why did the govt forbid diving on wreck?
Talk:Mākaha, Hawaii

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Kawaihae, Hawai'i - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The part about Makaha Resort needs to be corrected. They closed down in 2011 and demolished in 2014. 
I did a Google search. Hawaii News Now has a story about Makaha Resort closing in 2011 and multiple sources have stories about it being demolished in 2014. 
Please let me know if you need more information or if I can help. Thank you. TacosAndSpag (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course you may add it with a source. To format the source, you can use this tool. Cheers! --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:27, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makaha
Talk:Sydney Motorsport Park

message: Could someone load some images for all the layouts? It's kinda confusing, especially when the lap records are only listed for the traditional 'Grand Prix' circuit. TollHRT52 (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2012 (AEST)
:Images are always difficult as it requires someone to own the image before they can upload it to Wikipedia. You can't take images from elsewhere as it breaches copyright. Basically you are asking someone to draw a map using appropriate cartographical software and to my knowledge no-one is doing that within the Motorsport Wikiproject anymore. --Falcadore (talk) 00:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Circuit maps

message: A large selection of new content has been added to this article which has been copied directly from the following websites:
So the recently added material has been removed. --Falcadore (talk) 11:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: I've been looking at moving around some of the page's content, in particular the History and Major Events sections. I'll be working on it in my sandbox, would like to here others' thoughts on it. KytabuTalk 07:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page content
Talk:HMS Albion (1898)

message: She was laid down by "Thames Iron Works at Blackwall" but their yard was at Leamouth in Blackwall? Robkam (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Built at Blackwall or Leamouth?

message: Illustration available here. Needs to be cleaned up a bit though. Parsecboy (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A number of images here, none of Albion it seems, but a number of other battleships. Parsecboy (talk) 19:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: This has some details of the operations off the Dardanelles. Parsecboy (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Burt specifically states that Albion was "built by Thames Ironworks at Blackwall". Burt is an authoritative source on British ships of the era, and while it's possible he made a mistake, we would need fairly strong evidence to contradict him. Parsecboy (talk) 11:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I too checked Burt, here  (p46) and he does say Blackwall, ie London, not Canning Town side, ie Essex. The IP seems to know otherwise but I agree we must use Burt unless someone can with certainty show it was Essex. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 12:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I poked around a bit and noted there's a short film of her launching titled The Launch of HMS 'Albion' at Blackwall (see for instance here; the footage itself is available on youtube); I can't imagine contemporary filmmakers didn't know where they were. This book, also discussing the film, note that "...HMS Albion was being launched by the Thames Ironworks and Shipbuilding Yard at the juncture of Bow Creek and the Thames, usually known as Blackwall." Parsecboy (talk) 12:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

text: This is pure speculation by me because I do not know the specific area concerned, but if the shipbuilding yard does straddle two banks, London and Essex, it will presumable have its head office, and hence address, on one side. If on the left side, that would mean it would often, if not always, be refered to as TISY, London, which was its address. Put another way, London/Essex refers to where the shipyard was located, not where the ship was built. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of construction
Talk:HMS Ocean (1898)

message: How have you come to the conclusion that the source I added isn’t reliable? It was used on the article Seyit Çabuk, HMS Ocean was struck by an artillery shell before striking a mine. Rodrigo Valequez(🗣) 22:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the site; it's clearly an amateur project. Parsecboy (talk) 22:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

text: You didn't read WP:RS, did you? I strongly suggest you do. As to the site, no, it's not reliable. For it to be considered reliable, it would have to be produced by experts in the field. Since the site does not disclose the identity of it's author, we can only conclude that it's a hobbyist site, and thus, not usable. Parsecboy (talk) 00:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

text: It's no problem, there's no deadline to get anything done here. Parsecboy (talk) 00:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

text: I’ll get it done as soon as possible, I’ll add the translated title but I won’t be able to add byline and date of publication today. I’m repairing my computer and I can’t contribute as well on mobile, thanks! Rodrigo Valequez(🗣) 18:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

text: I’m having some issues with the template, could I translate the title for you to add the template? The title translates to “Who was Corporal Seyit? How much did the shell he lifted weigh?”, the second part actually translates to “How many kilos was the shell lifted by Koca Seyit?“ but I don’t think it would be suitable because of it’s length. Rodrigo Valequez(🗣) 18:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the translated title to the article - I was actually going to suggest you posting the translation here if you weren't able to add it to the template, but you beat me to it. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Also, I’ve read WP:RS before, I assumed the source was reliable because that’s what most Turkish-made websites look like (We aren’t the best coders). I’ve been making minor edits as an IP for the past 3 years and I haven’t gotten the hang of citing. Rodrigo Valequez(🗣) 19:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding my contributions
Talk:HMS King Edward VII

message: The text states this class did not have its 6-inch guns in casemates. But the photos show what looks to me like 6-inch guns in casemates along the side. ?? Rcbutcher (talk) 02:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did not have 6 inch guns in casemates? 

message: The caption for the photo passing New Brighton says it's in Canada, but it's clearly of New Brighton on the Mersey. What's the best way to word the caption. Merseyside doesn't sound right for the era. Maybe just 'New Brighton, River Mersey'?
BPMullins | Talk 03:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh - that's what you get for following the caption from the archive. One wonders how they confused a small, unincorporated settlement in BC for a fairly large metro area. And that tower is fairly recognizable. Parsecboy (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Brighton 

message: I have a picture of the King Edward VII during the sinking taken from the deck of the OWL.
this is the original photograph with the description of the sinking including time date longitude and latitude. 2600:100F:A013:B9DA:910C:8C55:D6DD:474 (talk) 04:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the sinking
Talk:Nantucket High School

message: I heard a number of years back that either the cost to build NHS, or the amount spent on each student, was enough to send ALL the students to off-island private schools "forever." Instead, islanders opted to build the school. Anyone know the accuracy of this? Any sources? Might be interesting to include in this article. Arwcheek 02:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost of building NHS

message: The cost to build NHS was approved to be built for 28.5 million but was stalled by the Historical District Comission was re-voted in 1987 to be built for 31.3 million dollars. It is to this day, the largest construction project in history of the island.
Source: Nantucket Only Yesterday by Robert F. Mooney
Mg rotc2487 21:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost of Building NHS
Talk:Benny Elias

message: * Added several facts regarding media, business and board experience
* Added the Controvery section
* Removed suggestions of opinion that were without substantiation e.g. "many historians argue ... "
* Removed The tour was controversial because of its timing in the middle of a State of Origin series 
whilst valid, it's unclear how it is relevant to the current context.
* Elias' skill was so great that he was an automatic selection for the following year's Kangaroo Tour was changed to 
Elias was subsequently selected for the following year's Kangaroo Tour - selection for the Kangaroos is in itself a recognition of skills.
* 1987 saw no advance on previous form, but Elias' brilliant workrate in defence, superb backing up, and perfectly judged kicking and chasing reached a new level in 1988: he became the chief force that pushed Balmain into its first Grand Final since 1969. 
POV - sentences pertaining to his skills are already included in the introductory paragraph (Many historians of rugby league argue that...).
* Elias is now one of two hookers to win the RLW player of the year award - Steve Walters won in 1993.
* when he narrowly missed a field goal that would have won the game for sure. - changed to 
narrowly missing a vital field-goal attempt.
* It wasn't until 1990 that Elias became the unquestioned first-choice representative hooker,
I'd question that. Because he was injured in 1989 (as the writer previously alluded to), Kerrod Walters has taken over as the main Test rake. In fact, Walters was the first-choice hooker on the 1990 Roo Tour, only dropped after defeat to Great Britain.
Discussions welcomed.--Alexio 02:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit
Talk:Canopus-class battleship

message: Hi all
During the copyedit a few things came to light which may need looking at:
* "Goliath served there again during 1909–1914, through the renaming of the Home Fleet as the Channel Fleet in 1914. HMS Albion and Glory went to the Channel Fleet prior to their Home Fleet service, 1905–1906, together with Canopus, 1906–1907." - This seems a little strange, the first sentence seems to say that the Home fleet was renamed to the Channel fleet in 1914, yet the second says that the ships went first to the Channel fleet prior to Home fleet service . How can this be? Either the Home Fleet was amalgamated into the Channel Fleet and so would make the first sentence correct, or the second sentence is incorrect and the dates of service refer to their Home Fleet service.
* "from XXXX-XXXX". To use them in a phrase "served from XXXX-XXXX" would possibly be read to imply that service started during that time period (and continued after it), especially when talking about plurals. I realise that this is possibly controversial, but remembering that non-native English readers may be looking at this they may not understand the implied "from XXXX-XXXX" means "from XXXX to XXXX". I have changed to "during" and "in". It might be easier to use (XXXX-XXXX) as this would remove the need for a clarifying "in", "during" or "from". I also notice that many of the later sections on the individual ships do not use the qualifier.
Chaosdruid (talk) 04:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit
Talk:King Edward VII-class battleship

message: I feel that
All the King Edward VIIs had four 12-inch (305 mm) guns in two twin turrets and a secondary armament of twelve 6-inch (152 mm) guns on a displacement of 13,000 to 
should be
All these classes had four 12-inch (305 mm) guns in two twin turrets and a secondary armament of twelve 6-inch (152 mm) guns on a displacement of 13,000 to 
pietro151.29.249.152 (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  misprint
Talk:Tregear, New South Wales

message: (I live in Tregear) I understand the description of every shop in the shopping centre was silly, but why was the origin of the name of the suburb removed? jayoval 21:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: :It was moved under the History heading. J Bar 03:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Extreme PaintBrawl

message: Should it also have the DOS games category? The menus run in Windows, but the game itself is MS-DOS. Dominicmgm (talk) 18:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the DOS games category to the article