lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caprice (1967 film)

message: Panavision is a company not a process. Ultra Panavision also known as MGM Camera 65 is an anamorphic process. Super Panavision is a spherical process.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.71.154 (talk) 15:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panavision
Talk:Ultimate Factories

message: "MegaFactories" ("Ultimate Factories") should be merged with MegaStructures since this is a sub-series of the TV show.
--202.95.200.12 05:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with MegaStructures 

message: I will try to do some work on this one this week. There are quite a few sources to pick from. Bruxton (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work
Talk:The seamstress (A Tale of Two Cities)

message: This figure is important to the end of the book, particularly to the final resolution of Sydney's character and the validation of the true goodness within him. 
After just finishing the novel, I felt the Seamstress was a very powerful character and, thus, revamped the article so it is more comprehensive. I'm glad they didn't delete this page.
Chandra K-R (talk) 01:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:C. R. Boxer

message: Which is Wellington College he attended ? Kzhr 08:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Considering the extent of the seminal and insightful contribution of Boxer to his field, whose relevance is felt still today in pretty much every publication on the Portuguese and the Dutch and their presence in Asia, this modest wikipedia entry would not only benefit from a more detailed and broader look at his writings, but also from a more considerate account of Boxer's life and experience. Surely, a figure larger than life, to paraphrase the wikipedia article, would no doubt deserve greater care than an entry that is almost entirely plagiarised from the Guardian obituary it refers to (vide Guardian obituary by Antonio de Figueiredo referenced at the bottom of the article)...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.170.99.72 (talk) 02:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Originality
Talk:C. Walter Hodges

message: Hodges illustrated the front covers of a 1948-47 edition of E. Nesbit's Treasure Seekers and its sequel. See .
I haven't mentioned those in the article because they are only book covers and I have not mentioned ISFDB, even by External link, because its report is so meagre for Hodges. But I doubt that that database coverage of children's classics is complete even for "fantasy". So I don't think I know whether he did much work on classics and it would be good to know that here.
 is the 1958 Kirkus Review of his only interior illustration reported by ISFDB, for a new book. --P64 (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration of children's classics 

message: Here is a listing at WorldCat: Hodges, C. Walter that may be worth pursuing somehow. 
* Shakespeare's first Globe playhouse : the Harvard Theatre Collection model : reconstruction by C. Walter Hodges.
: Description: 	20 slides + 1 pamphlet.
: Other Titles: Harvard model of Shakespeare's Globe Playhouse.
It's the second-listed of WorldCat's "Most widely held works about C. Walter Hodges". I infer, but with little confidence, that the physical model is in the Harvard Theatre Collection while the slides and pamphlet have been distributed. --P64 (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shakespeare's first Globe ... reconstruction by CWH 
Talk:William Lummis

message: : (restore| cache|AfD)
The majority of voters on the talk page were in favour of keeping the article, yet it was merged. The article clearly demonstrates the subjects importance and notablility. The Victoria Cross is very important in the UK and this may not be obvious to American users. Lummis's research into it was historically very important and therefore notable. The article should be restored. The majority consensus was to keep Jack1956 21:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who exactly decided to merge this article? Unknown Unknowns 07:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find a record of a decision to merge this article anywhere.  If Kwsn has added the Merge Tag in bad faith then he's committed an act of vandalism and can have his editing privileges withdrawn. Unknown Unknowns 11:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at the links in the tag.  I did not decide that.  Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Canon_William_Lummis <--- where it was decided.  And I didn't do it. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry Kwsn.  Anyway, I've a feeling this will go to arbitration. Unknown Unknowns 08:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They won't take it, it's more of a content dispute. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

text: It's not a content dispute, you want the page deleted. We'll see about that. Schomberg 09:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: What you think is different from what I think.  I personally like Nick's decision, if you want, I'll get a hold of a second admin to see what he thinks. Kwsn(Ni!) 18:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Lummis is notable because he is a published author, with publications spanning a 40 year period, regardless of his VC research. Unknown Unknowns 12:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: I've taken the liberty of pulling the article around a bit. It may now contain typos. I see the merge tag has gone.  ← ROGER →  TALK 13:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised
Talk:Carl Esmond

message: I see very little agreement among sources about this, yet no discussion anywhere, just a pile of (different) assertions:
* 14 June 1902: NNDB, German WP
* 14 January 1905: The Independent
* 1907: LA Times (it does not give a precise date, but says he was aged 97 at death in December 2004)
* 14 January 1908: The Guardian
Also, German WP says his birth name was "Carl Cäsar Willy Simon".  That later became Eichberger, and later Esmond.  But everywhere else says he was born Eichberger.  
So, whom are we to believe about these details, and why?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added two notes supporting 14 January 1908, using the Guardian citation that you provided and a second source that I found. Unfortunately, as you said, the LA Times article does not give a precise date of birth. When I tried the link to the Independent, all I found was a page of current news headlines and pictures. As for the 1902 version, I don't think we can cite another version of Wikipedia, and I don't know whether NNDB is considered reliable for WP purposes. Perhaps something more will turn up later. Eddie Blick (talk) 03:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth and birth name
Talk:Rick Peckham

message: The link from the "Hal Crook + UM" page to the Rick Peckham page is wrong.  The Rick Peckham that is associated with Hal Crook and Um is the assistant chair of the guitar department at Berklee College of Music, not a sportscaster.  Just thought I'd let you people know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.136.22.4 (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong page
Talk:Carl F. H. Henry

message: — Assignment last updated by Zhearing (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Christian Ethics
Talk:Carl Fontana

message: I have deleted an enormous amount of blatant policy and guideline violation too numerous to list, but including unverified personal-life claims, enormous amounts of POV, alleged quotes without citation, much essaying, many WP:TONE vios and more. Deliberately restoring such blatant policy and guideline violations is considered vandalism and an admin will be notified. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Today's edits
Talk:Snoqualmie Falls

message: Kgrr 02:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Carlo Urbani

message: 2003, another doctor died who was one of the first to detect SARS. I think he was from china. Anybody has his name? --85.212.208.217 (talk) 13:07, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Liu Jianlun ..85.212.208.217 (talk) 13:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 another doctor died 
Talk:2007 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/March

message: ===Week 2===
====94B.INVEST====
6.2ºN 90.2ºE - 15 knots (NA) hPa - グリフオーザー 06:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: gone from NRL - グリフオーザー 01:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: March

message: ====94B.INVEST====
6.2ºN 90.2ºE - 15 knots (NA) hPa - グリフオーザー 06:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: gone from NRL - グリフオーザー 01:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Week 2

message: 6.2ºN 90.2ºE - 15 knots (NA) hPa - グリフオーザー 06:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: gone from NRL - グリフオーザー 01:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 94B.INVEST
Talk:Carrie Donovan

message: This article should not be included in Wikipedia. This is an entirely obscure person as far as significance is concerned. If this article is included in Wikipedia, a quarter of Americans alone should be also be included... The inclusion of this article in Wikipedia is almost entirely premised around this woman's participation in an insignificant television commercial. Stevenmitchell (talk) 10:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Issues 
Talk:Software technical review

message: I believe this refers to the Software Quality Control activity 'Formal Technical Review'. If that is indeed the case, then it should encompass all activities like Inspections, Walkthroughs and other technical assessments of the product and related activities. For more reference I would like to direct you to the precursor of Formal Technical Review , Fagan's code inspection techniques  [Fagan, 1976; Fagan, 1986] and Humphrey's software review method, which consists of a producer guiding a review team through all the available material.This article so far has reflected mostly the form FTRs take right about the time after the design phase. I'd seriously like to have some thoughts on these ideas from accomplished people in the field with some references before even contemplating an edit here
Love Bioskope 02:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Control Activity
Talk:Carroll Smith

message: This passage has several issues. 
Smith succumbed to pancreatic cancer in 2003 at his home in Northern California, leaving his daughter Dana, his son Christopher, and his fiancée Ginger.
Carroll's former wife, Jane, died on October 15, 1994 after a fall from a balcony in their home while she was gardening.
Carroll himself notes: "She went doing what she liked best, enjoying the ocean view and gardening...secure in the love of her family and friends and in the respect of her co-workers and students."
First, it reads like an obituary notice in a newspaper. 
Second, this is an unusual amount of detail about his former wife's apparently accidental death. 
And that's part of the problem. The subtext of mysterious domestic 'accidents' always plays to British murder-mystery paranoia. 
Are we including this amount of detail to problematize what appears to be the accepted societal surface narrative? 
Some serious editorial questions should be asked, here. — MaxEnt 18:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not an obituary
Talk:Shadetree Mechanic

message: we just brought car and and was driving at night lose heat check coolant was ruster flushed coolant system and replaced therm. and replace surge tank cap now it is it still overheating and no heat until gauge goes up to hot and come down then puts out heat it is all clean i was told taurus were bad about rust coler coolant only thing left is water pump do you think it will help or did i get screwed when i get car thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.11.96 (talk) 22:24, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  over heating problem on a 2000 ford taurus
Talk:Larry Crabb

message: I believe that Larry Crabb is one of the foremost proponents of imeshing the world with the Church.  He has promoted bringing the world into the church thus making the "Bride of Christ" unpure.  
₠  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Franklin777 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is not promoting meshing the world with the church. He specifically argues against man-based psychology in his book Inside Out. Crabb challenges us to dig deeper into what is driving sin in each of our lives. This may sound similar to, but is most definitely not Freudian. "Similar" (in an extremely superficial way) is not "same as." Sometimes Christian give pat answers to struggles with sin. Crabb suggests that sometimes the obvious sin is driven by a deeper sin. We may not want to confess this other sin to another person. We protect ourselves. Sometimes we are blind to a specific sin that relates to another sin. As a church we need to function in a way that we can expose our sins to God and each other in a way that the community can grow. When we understand how deeply sinful our flesh is, we can grow in understanding on how great the Cross is. I would suggest reading his books first before you dismiss him. In a perfect world, Jay Adams and Larry Crabb would collaborate. Then again, in a perfect world none of us would need counseling.Jeffgus (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cedric Price

message: Cedric attended what was then a co-educational state school, Alleyne's Grammar School in Stone, Staffordshire. My mother, then Miss Kathleen Heron, told me she taught Cedric A level maths. 130.88.123.137 (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early education
Talk:Islamic prayers

message: Which of the phrases in the article directly match that phrase abbreviated 'PBUH'?  Which would be abbreviated as 'SAW'?  It would be nice for people who have seen PBUH to know which phrase was equivalent. Shenme 02:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is "Alayh-es-salat-u wa-s-Salam" though it means "Upon him exaltations and peace". -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 11:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[PBUH]] and [[SAW]] 

message: This page being called "Islamic honorifics" is unnecessarily confusing. In the first place, as noted in the article itself, what is listed in the article are not properly considered "honorifics" the way that English honorifics are. In the second, because there are several articles that use it for people like the English (cultural) version does -- Indian honorifics, Italian honorifics, French honorifics -- the fact that this one uses it in a devotional manner makes it confusing. I'm not sure what the correct term for these phrases are but I suggest that someone more versed in Islam make a change. Thegreatmuka (talk) 15:20, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "honorifics" is a misapplication 

message: I fear I have messed up the article separating it from the talk page.  Islamic honorifics had been redirected to salat which was a rather big mistake IMHO, but arguably it should be redirected to Salawat. In my defense I have to say the stock phrases of Subhanahu wa-ta’ala, etc. appear very frequently in Islamic literature and non-Muslims could use an explanation for them. --BoogaLouie (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirecting and restoring article
Talk:The Plough and the Stars

message: This page is not for the film but for the play; so I have removed the boxes describing this as a film. The film is listed under The Plough and the Stars (film) Dozenthey (talk) 03:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Isn't this the play where the woman screams and whinges at her ICA fella to forget about Ireland and to look after his family. And he responds something like 'Go f@ck yourself, I'm off to fight for Ireland' (my rough translation, of course)? Classic. That man is my hero. PS: If somebody knows the plot and character names that would be a good addition. 86.42.119.12 (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Priorities

message: The speaker at the window is usually identified with Patrick Pearse, but are his words based particularly closely on what Pearse actually said? PatGallacher (talk) 18:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Speaker
Talk:Ideal Mini School

message: I dont want ip adresses editing Ideal, I dont know who they are, so unless they tell me (they might be churchill) I will keep it on.
Terminator50 04:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ..."they might be churchill?" Wikipedia is such a joke. I mean, they made a student at this crappy school an administrator. What does that tell you? --96.48.13.234 (talk) 00:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I disabled editing for new users
Talk:The Crimes of Stephen Hawke

message: Name-Nikku Hazir  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkuhazir (talk • contribs) 05:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Chan Tai San

message: This page refers to Baahk Mo Jyu as the "White Haired Devil" but other pages seem to call Hung Ju Sing instead by this name. Can anyone cite references to support either case?Xavierq (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Haired Devil 
Talk:Michael Spellman

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1931943/bio. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Charles Cameron (magician)

message: Charles Cameron (magician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Charles Wesley Cameron (31 October 1927 – 1 January 2001)
Death
Charles died at around 10:45 on the 7th of January 2001, due to a stomach aneurysm
76.227.79.81 (talk) 22:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  two different dates of Charles Cameron's death in article 
Talk:Three Little Pigskins

message: Just about every description of The Three Stooges refers to them as "slapstick" comedy. Moe Howard himself, however, when asked about The Three Stooges style of humor, called the trio "farce." I believe this was documented in the Tom Bergeron interview recordings with Moe Howard. 108.6.33.33 (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of Comedy
Talk:Charles Gaines (writer)

message: Is this the same guy who started paintball? Jwoodger (talk) 23:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Paintball

message: This entire article sounds like it was written by a public relations firm for the author. It makes unsupported claims about the importance and impact of the author's career. I have a high regard for the author, but this sugar coating of a career sounds like a promotion instead of an encyclopedic article. If someone is widely regarded as being something, references should make clear who regards this person in that light. I have tried to tone it down a bit and caught some incorrect assertions, but the  article could use a further copy edit for a more encyclopedic tone with appropriate references to accurately characterize this author's career.Hifrommike65 (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of this Wikipedia page
Talk:The Mystery of the Mary Celeste

message: The infobox (which was added by  in 2009) shows a (presumably UK) release date of 27 April 1935, but without a source for this date. IMDb, which is not a trusted source, shows 14 Nov 1935 in London, 27 April 1936 (not 1935) in UK, and 15 Oct 1936 in USA. Ref 1 indicates Australia release planned for early 1936. Ref 2 says release 1935 (presumably UK), Refs 3 and 4 don't help.
I suspect the infobox is incorrect, and that IMDb's date of 14 Nov 1935 is correct, supporting an Australian release in early 1936. Does anyone have any sources to settle this? Masato.harada (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello! I can confirm that the release date in the change I made here used IMDb as a source. Near the time of my edit the release date on IMDb was "27 April 1935 (UK)", see archived copy of film entry at IMDb here. It was updated to "15 October 1936 (USA)" in the next archived copy of the page here. If you find a more reliable source, please update this article. --Bensin (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. To deepen the confusion, the British Board of Film Classification website has no entry for The Mystery of the Mary Celeste, but the entry here does show Phantom Ship, classified 21/02/1936, which is another date to add to the mix. Masato.harada (talk) 14:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:2/4th Armoured Regiment (Australia)

message: As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: Similar comments to other articles in this series - especially with regards inline referencing However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 04:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[2/4th Armoured Regiment (Australia)]]
Talk:Summer Palace (2006 film)

message: I have downgraded comments about the sexual nature of the film as I believe these are subjective and I have reworded parts of the article to better reflect the citations. I have also requested that a citation is needed to support "several American film critics have described Summer Palace as one of the most sexually-explicit films in years" because only David Denby seems to support this view; Joshua Rothkopf and V.A. Musetta merely speculate on the reasons for the ban in China -- this does not imply that they believe the film is the "most sexually-explicit in years"!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.56.99.62 (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual nature of the film
Talk:Ministry of Steel

message: the page is not yet complete...will finish off in few hours..
--ebin viswanath 02:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Charles Randolph Grean

message: Grean may have written the lyrics to The Thing, but the tune and gimmick "Knock - KnockKnock" appear to have been lifted directly from The Chandler's Wife, as performed by Oscar Brand and released on his Bawdy Songs & Backroom Ballads, Vol. 1 in 1949, attributed as "Traditional". Doug butler (talk) 00:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 
Talk:NGC 346

message: HII Region N66 
70.29.209.121 (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HII Region N66