lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Wenninger polyhedron models

message: I created this page to help reference the uniform polyhedra in Wenninger indices, as well as to ennumerate his extra 44 stellated forms.
I include the names from MathWorld which are a little different. I'll include the names Wenninger uses as well.
Links to Uniform Polyhedra will be completed in relation to work in List of uniform polyhedra
Tom Ruen 22:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I agree there's much room for explaining more here. I actually got started on this parallel list because Mathworld referenced Wenninger models by number 1..119, and I purchased the book. Basically a short summary of the of the book should be included. Basically it's a "Construction book" with all the details of how to build these polyhedra. Tom Ruen 08:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation

message: The Wythoff symbols given in the book for W74, W86, W90, W96, W101, W103, W109 all have four numbers, the last two being stacked.  (I have no idea what that means.)  This table doesn't show that.  —67.180.195.33 (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The individual Wythoff symbols each have faces in common. The stacked symbol indicates only taking the faces in either degenerate polyhedra in common. For more information see: List of uniform polyhedra by Schwarz triangle. Shadi1089 (talk) 02:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  strange Wythoff symbols 

message: Dear fellow Wikipedians: 
I will make a note to a potential revision. If this is deemed unnecessary, you can revert the changes. I will probably finish making a draft by tomorrow. 
 
Thanks, 
Shadi1089 (talk) 02:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Image Redecoration?
Talk:Line E (Buenos Aires Underground)

message: This photo of Pichincha station is posted on Flickr under a Creative Commons license. 
Can it be uploaded? If so, please do...
It's: http://www.flickr.com/photos/morrissey/6887130/in/pool-basubway/ elpincha 22:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:My Parents are Aliens

message: I've bio'ed all that characters except Howie. He was introduced in Series 3 I think, but I know barely anything about him. Someone needs to do that. Foolish Mortal 22:29, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? I'm sure he became a regular character. Foolish Mortal 13:48, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Howie?

message: There has already been ana rticle on this show for several months now, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Parents_are_Aliens
I suggest merging the two articles together.
Good idea. The two articles both contain completely different information it would be a shame to lose by deleting one, but the only reason there are two articles not one is down to a letter 'a' being typed differently by different people!
Yeah, definitely merge 'em.  Foolish Mortal 13:48, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Already an article
Talk:Barred knifejaw

message: You know instead of outright deleting this you could actually help and fill in this article.
*Redirect it to the latin name of the fish.  This is a valid topic, even if the article is wanting for information.  Not a speedy delete in my opinion.--Gaff talk 22:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Proposing Tsunami fish be merged into this page. It doesn't seem to be notable enough for an article; it fails WP:PAGEDECIDE and WP:10YT for sure, as it hasn't resurfaced in the press since the brief media coverage of the event in 2013.
— Kodiak Blackjack (talk) • (contribs) 22:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal, 23 May 2024

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Striped beakfish →  – FishBase uses "barred knifejaw," as does the USGS, NOAA, iNaturalist, even the Animal Crossing franchise's English localizations. Justification for 's move from "Barred knifejaw" to "Striped beakfish" back in 2006 was that the latter was used in FishBase, ITIS, and "most other references" - while ITIS still does (likely because Wikipedia does), the only ref cited in the article that uses "striped beakfish" is [3], which is dead. [1] uses the scientific name, but ⅔ of its own references use "barred knifejaw" - the remainder uses the Latin name, and not "striped beakfish." Every related species with a page on Wikipedia has their vernacular name given as "_____ knifejaw," as well as the genus and family as a whole. Google Scholar shows only one paper that uses "striped beakfish" in the title, compared to 14 which use "barred knifejaw" in the title. All of this despite Wikipedia naming this article "striped beakfish" for nearly 20 years. Maybe we're the ones who are out of touch. — Kodiak Blackjack (talk) • (contribs) 22:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 May 2024
Talk:Chit fund

message: Shouldn't the title of this page really be "Chit Fund", not just chit? A chit is just really a ticket used for the auction historically. --Ewhite77 22:53, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Hello, 
May be the website have copied from Wikipedia also.
124.124.211.93 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it seems probable that they have. We can see that it includes content added in this series of edits, but also content that was present in the article prior to that. Other sources may have been copied in the creation of this article, but given that fact it seems unlikely that we copied from them. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:09, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverse infringement

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://maddy06.blogspot.com/2009/05/kuri-systems-of-kerala.html http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_chit-fund-companies-on-the-rise_1288173. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 11:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Infringing content was added here. The remainder of that edit was presumptively removed per WP:COPYVIO. MER-C 11:04, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Dream art

message: Would Robert Miles' Children fit into this category? Ojw 22:57, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: how is dream art different from surrealist art? Kingturtle 04:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  surrealism? 

message: This section appears to conflate works which have dreams as their subject matter with works which their creators claim to have been inspired by real dreams they had. It should probably either be retitled to make it explicitly a list of works inspired by their creators' dreams, have a preamble stating that to be the case, or split into two sections if a list of works with dreams as their subject matter is also within this article's purview.
--69.41.201.188 (talk) 17:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works directly based on dreams
Talk:Treaty of Accession 2003

message: Why does the map for this article utilize three shades of green to indicate two groups of countries? Specifically; why are Sweden, Finland and Austria a different shade of green from all the other then current EU members? I'm not sure how to fix an image, so could someone else do it? Khajidha (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: All information in this article could easily fit in the 2004 enlargement of the European Union article (which is relatively short). - SSJ t 21:56, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but it is okay as a separate article for the treaty. I don't feel strongly about this though if someone else supports the merger.- J.Logan`t: 17:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Tahir Salahov

message: Why do you think, the portrait is PD? According to the article the portrait is painted in 1976, three years after the 1973 needed for sovietpd. Maybe the date is wrong (Shostakovich died in 1975)? Otherwise we have to delete the Shostakovich portrait and find something exponated before 1973.
----
Dear Mr. Bakharev,
As far as I know this image is a public domain and you can see it all over the internet (at least Russian and CIS websites) without any reference to a copyright holder. As for the date of the portrait, it was completed after Shostakovich died, in 1976, as the great composer was fatally ill when he posed for the portrait. So the date is correct. If you speak Russian, you can also check this article for more details on this subject:
http://www.kultura-portal.ru/tree/cultpaper/article.jsp?number=492&crubric_id=100445&rubric_id=200&pub_id=479779
If you think that this image cannot be used due to copyright issues, then we can replace it with some other Salahov’s work, e.g. portrait of Kara Karayev (completed before 1973). But I think Shostakovich’s portrait is one of the best Salahov’s portraits and well illustrates his style of painting, so I would prefer to keep it. Thank you. Grandmaster 06:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright of the Shostakovich portrait [[:Image:Shostakovichportrait.jpg]].
Talk:YoCrunch

message: Don't they also make Yo Baby amd Yo Mama?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.255.229.66 (talk) 16:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  yo baby 

message: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/09/us-danone-yocrunch-idUSBRE9780H120130809  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.100.146 (talk) 20:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danone
Talk:Otto Preminger

message: Born 1905 not 1906 as per born 1905, not 1906 per his own gravestone/niche and the Social Security Death Index. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: Okay, so where's the discussion of what, specifically, makes this article potentially POV?  Or was this just a "drive-by" tagging?  75.225.83.38 (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion? 

message: Is it me or is there something odd about a detailed Personal Life section which ignores two whole wives? 31.124.106.55 (talk) 03:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriages? 

message: The photograph of Preminger with five cast members has a garbled caption.  The last person on the right is Rosy Barsony.  The men's features are sufficiently similar that I can't put them in proper order. J S Ayer (talk) 15:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph with bad caption 

message: Is there a source for his Alzheimer's diagnosis? I could not find one in the article. I ask because Hope Bryce denies that he was ever diagnosed with Alzheimer's (despite others' claims that he had Alzheimer's) in Foster Hirsch's biography of Preminger, which is cited elsewhere on the page. I will add a mention of Hope's claim in the article text; if there is a source to the contrary, that should be mentioned as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.225.114.30 (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alzheimer's Diagnosis
Talk:Andy Taylor (The Andy Griffith Show)

message: There's nothing here that isn't on the Andy Griffith Show page.  Delete this page already. CantStandYa 23:10, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hello! Under the part about occupations, shouldn't there be a reference to hsi time spent as being the Editor of the local newspaper? That was one of the jobs he held when he caused Danny much frustration and/or consternation in that so-called "back door pilot episode"! Also, Barney inspected his own mother's car during a dragnet/roadblock. After he spoke a line she said, "But Barney! I'm your mother!" or words to that affect. LeoStarDragon1 (talk) 08:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISSING DATA! 

message: How could son of Andrew Jackson Taylor be Andrew Samuel Taylor, jr.??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.143.35.161 (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son
Talk:Trampin'

message: Every review in the infobox refers to the album as Trampin'.  Even Patti's site uses a capital letter when the album title begins a sentence, as can be found here:
:Trampin' has been released by Columbia Records.
:Here is the page with information about trampin'.
:If you order trampin' from the Sony Music Store you will receive a pamphlet containing the album's lyrics and photographs by Patti Smith (while supplies last).
Given these uses, why clutter the article's beginning with :Template:lowercase?  66.167.139.219 08:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed use of :Template:lowercase as per WP:NC#Album titles and band names. --PEJL 15:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trampin' vs. trampin' 
Talk:Grade school mathematics

message: This is clearly a huge project.  One problem, of course, is the level of vocabulary to use.  I don't think we should worry at the start about vocabulary lists -- just use easy words, and keep in mind that three year olds know what a "tyranosaurus" is even if they can't read the word, yet. 
I would like to see this entire project split off into a Wiki for Kids some day.  Math isn't the only area with bad textbooks.
Rick Norwood 23:14, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:New Fun Comics

message: The early history of comics still being pieced together to this day, it's not surprising there was a bit of confusion in the New Fun Comics entry as originally written. I've deleted the sentence about Siegel & Shuster doign "Federal Men" in New Fun Comics #2. They actualy did it for just plain old New Comics #2. This information appears on numerous comics-history sites and books, including the Goulart book referenced here, as well as the site Who Drew Superman?, which includes scans of the earliest Siegel & Shuster works. 
Hey, I'm just happy a fellow fan cared enough about history to create a New Fun page in the first place! -- Tenebrae 23:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! We should also do a New Comics article as well. I'd give my eye teeth to get my hands on any of these treasures! 23skidoo 18:24, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Siegel & Shuster

message: I disagree with merging More Fun Comics with this title. Although it was a continuation, More Fun was its own separate entity. Right now the article is just a stub, but in time it'll be expanded. IIRC, for example, More Fun introduced The Spectre and Green Lantern. 23skidoo 17:58, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging More Fun
Talk:Pronunciation of Celtic

message: The "Celtic or Seltic?" link to The Guardian has rotted. I am not sure that the article is available any more.
:Yeh, it was a second-rate article anyway.  --Doric Loon 10:58, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I'll be telling you that we are tired of our heritage as C(s)elts trying to be changed to name us after a garment worn by only the Scots, namely the kilt.
:it is most definitely pronounced Keltic
I was taught that Celtic is usually pronounced as Keltic.  However under English rules a hard G is followed cy a soft C hence Glasgow Celtic (/s/).  Note a similar rule is used for a provincial Irish newspaper called The Anglo Celt (/s).  I cannot explain Boston Celtic, unless it was called after the Glasgow soccer team, hence the pronunciation.  Given the strong Irish connection in Boston this is very plausible.
86.42.7.192 22:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice story.  This is a good example of people trying to rationalise linguistic phenomena without understanding the linguistics behind it.  A dissimmilation of /c/ to /g/ resulting in the shift /c/ > /s/?  A new one on me.  Certainly not a standard English rule, or else we would have to pronounce gas as /gak/.  Read the article - the Celtic phenomenon is part of a bigger picture which makes perfect sense without this.  --Doric Loon 07:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

text: "it is most definitely pronounced Keltic" Statements like this are exemplary of the strange dogmatism that has infected this word...you really don't find that many words where people get all huffy if you don't pronounce it their way. 
Poissonally, I will always say "keltik" if it's spelled with a K-, and "seltik" if it's spelled with a C-. I like to keep things simple and uphold tradition (that means "traditional tradition", not "trendy tradition", if you get my drift. Jakob37 17:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I was merely noting, and not inadvertently, that there seems to be some strange emotional fervor attached to "the trend" -- I have actually been harshly criticised for --quite unintentionally -- pronouncing it as "seltik", which is strange because Americans do not usually openly criticise someone else about their pronunciation... Jakob37 14:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  C(s)elt or C(k)elt 

message: User:Dbachmann proposed merging this into Celts (name); however, since it is a redirect to Names of the Celts I presume that is what he wants to merge with.  I agree with the merge, since this article is not easily found, and the material could be well integrated with other material on the use of the word.  However I would want to point out that the article we are merging to already has some misinformation on this topic - it says the English pronunciation with /s/ is a French influence, which is certainly wrong.  The explanation in THIS article is better, and should be kept more or less intact as a sub-section at its new home, other material there being brought into line with it.  --Doric Loon (talk) 12:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree. Anyone want to begin?--Cúchullain t/c 18:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Lennart Green

message: I think that he was disqualified in 1988, not 1985 (excuse me for my english)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.213.51.135 (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FISM

message: this seems very POV. no descriptions of the magic and we are supporsed to believe 'unbelievably original' without supporting evidence? help anybody? Tiksustoo 23:20, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Genii magazine compared him to a Tex Avery with cards, and Magic Magazine said something like "Imagine someone on a desert island who found a deck of cards and reinvented the whole area of card magic from scratch." And the first time he competed at FISM, he was disqualified because the judges were so stunned that they assumed he played unfair and used mechanical devices and planted a whole array of "stooges" in the audience, because they "knew" that what they had seen was impossible with the techniques they were familiar with. --TStone 03:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: American TV? I think it was the 4th "World's Greatest Magicians" --TStone 03:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Just saw the clip that somebody parked of Green performing - just geeky and comes across as a skilled amateur. Strange. Can't quite see why magicians talk about him. I guess the clue is in the fact that there's an entire army of magicians out there who you or I will never get to hear of but they keep each other occupied by performing to each other? I am put off by the evidence. Somebody else please. Tiksustoo 00:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The clip is just from an informal session, not a formal performance. --TStone 03:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence?
Talk:Aberdeen Pavilion

message: 207.176.178.101 added "The Central Canada Exhibition Association contrbuted $1.3 million dollars to that renovation" to the article.  I have removed the clause, because it is not sourced (not that much else in the article is sourced).  If there is a source to be found, it would be great to restore it to the article.  Skeezix1000 12:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ex contributions
Talk:Shame society

message: Hello, What are some examples of Guilt societies?  How can we expand upon this comment (from the "Shame society" page):
"Contemporary Western society uses shame as one modality of control, but its primary dependence rests on guilt, and, when that does not work, on the criminal justice system." ~~ 137.254.4.6 (talk) 13:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of Guilt societies?

message: I don't see any relevance of this section in the article. Therefore I will delete it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.108.146.212 (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "America as a tamer of shame societies" 

message: The section on Japan seems to dedicate only one sentence to describing the society, and then digresses into a description of The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. I understand the relevance of the book to cultural anthropology, but is it really relevant to shame-society or it's history in Japan? Even of it were included, wouldn't it do well to include a bit more description of the actual culture to balance it out? --173.49.252.241 (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of The Chrysanthemum and the Sword?
Talk:CBC Ottawa Production Centre

message: * Moved article from CBC Ottawa Building to CBC Ottawa Broadcast Centre, as that appears to be the name CBC is using ().  Skeezix1000 21:50, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

message: * Moved from CBC Ottawa Broadcast Centre as the name appears to have changed (https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/services/facilities?filter=main) blindlynx (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: can both of you please discuss what you want from the lead here rather than endlessly reverting?—blindlynx 17:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead