lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ude garami

message: Please see my  discussion on my first technique page attempt,
Kata Guruma.
I made one statement in the Ude Garami article that Judo only has arm locks
for joint manipulation, that is no knee bars, etc...
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm not entirely sure about this, but
I've never heard of a Judo joint technique attacking anything other than the arm.
--Pereza 18:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I see that judo techniques are getting their own articles, even in cases where the move is found in many other grappling arts. While I think it's a good project overall, in the case of ude garami, I feel this move is too widely used in other arts to warrant it having a stand-alone article for judo's name for it. These armlocks already confuse many people due to the wide variety of terms
In BJJ, the two version of ude garami are usually called:
* americana
* kimura
Catch wrestlers use these names:
* top wrist lock
* double wrist lock
In my experience, American submission wrestlers without significant BJJ backgrounds call them:
* chicken wing
* hammerlock
* keylock
And I have heard these names used too:
* bent armlock
* paintbrush
* v-lock
* american armbar
* figure-four armlock
* reverse kimura
All of these names refer to just one (or both) of two armlocks. Different arts have minor differences in how they are applied, but the fundmentals of the grip on the arm and the pressure on the shoulder are the same. I don't feel they should be given different articles, which would just perpetuate the confusion between the names. A single article could explain how many arts share these armlocks, give all the different names, and explain any minor differences in how they are applied.
But if ude garami does keeps its own page that only gives a judo perspective on the move, it should be mentioned how there is some debate over its use, since judo rules forbid shoulder locks, which is the most common way for these armlocks to be applied. I've heard it argued that it can also be an elbow lock, and while it can put stress on the elbow, from personal experience (doing and receiving) these are shoulder locks unless something special happens, like catching an odd angle as someone escapes.
--Aesopian 13:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A solution is to redirect to the common article, armlock, but keep the categorization in the redirect page. This will keep the name 'ude garami' under the judo techniques category, and redirect it to the larger article. Now merged. Shawnc (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with armlock article
Talk:Stanlow Oil Refinery

message: where in the oil refinery??????
: Stanlow TomGreen 20:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Alternative Service Book

message: Much better, a few things could still (I reckon) do with sorting.
The section on "The Book" could perhaps be split into subsections for each service, then for the lectionary and the last couple of chpaters perhaps moved into a new section "After the ASB" or something like that.
On readings, the first sentence doesn't make much sense to me:
The two year cycle of Readings was ordered to which thematic titles were given.
I suspect something's got accidentally removed in editing, but I can't work out what (I could trawl back through the page history I suppose...)
  These proved not very hardwearing and it was not long before priests if not
  parishioners noticed that in spite of the huge increase in the amount of
  Scripture heard - there were now three readings, Old Testament, New
  Testament and Gospel, much was missed out. When the reading aloud of the
  Bible at home and Scripture as the basis of Religious Education were the
  rule, this may not have mattered. Now that both had disappeared it did.
There's still an element of POV here, I'm not sure hardwearing is the right description, or if the comments on RE and personal reading of the scripture really have a place here (or at least not phrased in this way).  I'm also not convinced by the use of bowdlerised in realtion to the prayer of oblation elsewhere in the text
  There was a good range of Prefaces to the Eucharistic Prayers, including
  one for St. Michael and All Angels. This went in 2000 as well.
It's not clear to me why this preface in particular is regarded as worthy of comment
  General Synod learned not to repeat the time-hungry debates though which
  it had been born.
I assume this is referring to the process by which Common Worship was put through Synod, but this could probably be made more explicit.  David Underdown 15:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much improved
Template talk:History of Bulgaria

message: The Byzantine domination period IMO should be included, because otherwise how would an uninformed reader expain the gap between the First and Second bulgarian empires?  /FunkyFly.talk_   19:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, "Independent Bulgaria" seems a bit ugly; wouldn't "Kingdom of Bulgaria" be better? It would be more coherent with the following "People's Republic of Bulgaria" and "Republic of Bulgaria".--Aldux 00:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The current colors of the template make it very hard to read. Any objections to changing the colour scheme ? - ☣Tourbillon A ? 09:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is no problem. I think, however, that the icon of St Theodore should stay because it is one of the most recognizable symbols of medieval Bulgaria. It is more recognizable than the coat of arms of the Shishman dynasty, which in Arabic style - something very distant from the Bulgarian culture. --Gligan (talk) 13:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will keep the icon, the coat of arms is just a temporary addition. - ☣Tourbillon A ? 14:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

text: I believe that  FunkyFly   is right.  Like we have 'Ottoman Bulgaria' for the period 1396-1878 we ought to have also something like 'Byzantine Bulgaria' for the period 1018-1185, even if there seems to be no such article as yet. Apcbg (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree that such article 'Byzantine Bulgaria' has to be created. Jingiby (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

text: I continue to insist the stabile version with the chapter Byzantine conquest to be kept. Jingiby (talk) 16:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason was specified for the changes concerning the Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria that have been recently made, nor discussion was held here. There is no consensuss about this controversial changes. Please IP, if you continue blind reverts and avoid to discuss your ideas here and to reach a consensuss, I am going to request this template to be semi-protected. Jingiby (talk) 05:41, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Byzantine domination period
Talk:List of computer worms

message: I would suggest all of 182.74.42.158's edits should be undone. Mark Hurd (talk) 22:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  182.74.42.158's edits 

message: Here's a list of worms that could be added:
* Ramen worm (2000) --Fuhrmanator (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing worms 

message: Wikitable not wikitable-sortable.
I want this error for be fixed, so i sort by name and no date. 134.255.241.135 (talk) 12:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sortable
Talk:Paul Stamets

message: I came to understand the subject after a video and found an article short to the point of confusion. Came to the talk page and what I've read here is so absurd to be hilarious. The very reason I came was that I wanted to understand the context of his more weird statements, but the article is deceptively void of information.
What I found here is that we should just swap the article for the talk page. The guy is pretty much, and verifiable by numerous sources, relevant for Wikipedia, mycologist, successful entrepreneur, researcher, all that WHILE being biased, self-taught, kinda nuts and with COI, not DESPITE that.
The current state of the article merely harms its purpose. Relevant information is being withheld out of personal disagreement. This doesn't damages Stamets' business as he already advocates for himself pretty damn well, this damages Wikipedia and the reader's access to relevant knowledge to make a judgement if it is needed.Monteparnas (talk) 14:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please WP:FOC and suggest specific changes to the article. Controversy sections are to be avoided per WP:CSECTION. --Hipal (talk) 15:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ad a "Controversies" section
Talk:The Wind Will Carry Us

message: I removed the ref to the list of films based on poems, as I can tell that the film's writer/director is a poet what am unable to determing the work the film is based on. If there is a source poem, would someone who knows what it is reference it in the article, please? thanks! ♥ Her Pegship♥ 23:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem? 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Come Together Now

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be "Come Together Now" rather than "Come together now"? I think the first line is a give away! EvocativeIntrigue 19:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Sir Dystic

message: Myles Long, "Josh Buchbinder" is relatively well-known in Microsoft computer security circles and conferences. Additionally, his name is referenced at the following URLs (amongst other places I have no time to dig up at the moment):
http://www.answers.com/topic/sir-dystic
http://www.sdnp.undp.org/rc/forums/tech/sdnptech/msg01713.html
Out of respect for sd, cDc, and you, I'll leave the decision of a re-add up to you, since you seem to be the primary maintainer of this article. Jgw 01:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not disputing your point, but the answers.com reference is bogus, since it is just a copy of what's already here on Wikipedia.  Alan 15:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: It's not bogus, although it appears to be bogus as a reference. As a point of reference, you can also find many of his old pre-cDc days posts to alt.tasteless where he openly used his real name in connection with his nickname, Sir Dystic (sirdystic@crl.com iirc). Anyway, as I said before, I leave it in the hands of Myles. As an aside, what has sd been up to, these days? I haven't talked to him in a long time now and hope he's doing well. He was an insanely prolific, humble, and creative coder and he directly got me started with Win32 C and Windows network programming. Jgw 18:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delay.  Yeah, since his real name was in the New York Times, I suppose it's fair game.  That's probably the best reference to use, imo.  I'll add it myself shortly.  As for what he's been up to, I'd better let him tell you himself.  The email address listed for him here works. --Myles Long 15:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Name 
Talk:Outdoor sculpture in Washington, D.C.

message: Re: the Samuel Hahnemann statue at Scott Circle. Anyone know why there is a statue of this German homeopathic physician in Washington? Does this guy have any connection to the United States? I just want to make sure we're linking to the correct article here and, if so, maybe there is info that can be added to the Samuel Hahnemann article.  --dm (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did a little research and found that the statue was placed there by the American Institute of Homeopathy so the link is correct. --dm (talk) 08:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Samuel Hahnemann statue

message: This article appears to be redundant when compared to List of public art in Washington, D.C..  Perhaps this information should be merged into that list.  --RichardMcCoy (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the more working on this the better! :) Missvain (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:   See Talk:List_of_public_art_in_Washington,_D.C.#Merger_proposal. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a more general question here about what information readers should be able to expect from this kind of page. (I say this as someone who is working on the Boston public art page, which is way behind this one indevelopment. What is WP policy on lists like this? Should they be incorporated onto a page that gives context for the development of public artwork in that area locale? That makes sense to me. But--what's the WP take on these questions? Sicklemoon (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy

message: Perhaps the translation of the French version would be interesting. Some sections are already translated.
Regards.--Stefanos Stefanos (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  French version of the article
Talk:Fool for the City

message: The article photo is of a re-issue.  The original cover had a painted-over picture of Earl on the street, super-imposed on the street photo - or doctored on the street photo.  I bought the record when it first came out (same day, actually) and noticed the next year the change in the cover.  Discogs (www.discogs.com) has pictures of the original, un-altered front cover. Never read why that was done? 50.111.5.59 (talk) 08:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  original album cover
Talk:The Dante Club

message: For some reason Lowell's son in law is called Edward New in the novel when his name was actually Edward Burnett. RichardBond (talk) 02:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Russell Lowell's son in law 

message: Yvmvhvb 94.73.58.237 (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vgh
Talk:Merkin Vineyards and Caduceus Cellars

message: I created this page today because I have been into Maynard James Keenan's works for about 5 years and I have been interested in wine for about 1.5 years.  I am excited to learn about what Maynard believes makes a good wine, and I believe others out there are interested as well.  I did not create this page to advertise Merkin Vineyards; only to chronicle its history (admittedly a short one thus far).  I believe that since I can find the history of such companies as Volcano Records, Arista Records, Sony and Dell in the Wikipedia, then I should also be allowed to preserve information about Merkin Vineyards here as well.  I at no time made mention as to quality of product, nor did I ever imply that anyone should go buy any of said product; therefore, I do not believe this fits the 'Advert' category and I am removing the deletion request.  In the interest of fairness, the person who put up the deletion request did make me think very hard about the content and I do not want it to border on that of an advertisement; so I will be scrutinizing the content in the next day to ensure that I have not, in any way, made an effort to advertise for Merkin Vineyards.  If said person truly wants to rid the Wiki of this page after I have completely rid the content of anything remotely advert-like, they can put forth an AfD.  Thank you. H. merkin 20:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: This article was redirected to Maynard James Keenan as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 21:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Operation 40

message: There is abundant publicly available, non-classified archival information on Op 40 now available, it need not be referred to as "alleged."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.121.177 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following was found in the article. It was best to place it here.
"Due to the nature of the topic, it is imperative that all facts be well-documented, with citations/references, rely on credible sources, and avoid conspiracy theories. The 1975 Church Committee reports is a good place to start , as is the Cuban Information Archives." Joelito (talk) 21:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Joel! :-)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.121.177 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't this technically a terrorist group? 76.174.139.84 (talk) 20:31, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I'm not sure the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops "immortalizes" Op40, or if that is really relevant for the main section. Possibly in a "in popular culture" section? Dataxpress (talk) 03:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Ops? 

message: I saw that a section of the article was removed by @Nikkimaria which had been added by 68.5.51.186.  I am not the unregistered user, nor do I know them, but I did find the trivia interesting and believe some part of that trivia should be captured by the encyclopedia if only to mention that the Operation 40 was a playable faction in the video game.
::"Operation 40 is a playable faction in the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops. Within the game's campaign mode, there is heavy implication that the main protagonist and Operation 40 operative Alex Mason may have been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy as a Soviet sleeper agent."
Therefore, I would like a community review on what part of this (some or all) should remain as part of the article or how to transform it into an appropriate part of the article.  I believe the source (fandom.com) counts as a tertiary source. eximo (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not considered a reliable source - see WP:RSP. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture edit
Talk:Vetala

message: OK, what? Is there even such a thing? The statements mentioning this strike me as prejudicial, and I don't say this in a hypersensitive mustn't-offend-the-Muslims kinda way. Doctor Atomic (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Muslim Black Magic?

message: Sometimes I heard this is referred to as "Katakhanoso". Can anyone verify?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Unbeholden (talk • contribs) 19:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Katakhanoso?

message: In the TV-series Supernatural, season 7 episode 11 (Adventures in Baby Sitting), Sam and Dean is called by a girl whos father was hunting a Vetala.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.73.17 (talk) 05:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference is popular culture
Talk:Dan Ross (American football)

message: I have added sections and clarified his death based on an MSNBC News story. Capitalistroadster 20:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformatted article
Talk:Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam

message: Just based off of how well they did with Sk8land, who agrees with me that the DS version of this doomed game will probably be much better than this silly Wii incarnation?
Better than Wii version? Yeah. Doomed? Not if they actually bother to advertise it. They barely mentioned Tony Hawk's American Sk8land; it was overshadowed by Tony Hawk's American Wasteland. --Gaming King 07:46, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DS Version

message: Can anyone substantiate this claim? Stellmach 20:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's better if each new response is separated from others with enters and indents. Format aside, this really does need a citation. *inserts Citation Needed tag* --Gaming King 17:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Skate or Die?

message: Is the US release date for the DS version. Gimme a sec to find if any other dates have been given, and to get a source for that...
EDIT: November 17th for Europe. Both can be found at IGN.http://uk.ds.ign.com/objects/824/824473.html
I'll go ahead and add this, though I have little experience with adding things, which is why I felt the need to post this here. --The last sheikah 19:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: October 24

message: They are now improved, but I think they should be deleted because I don't care. Also, THDJ tfrckz!!!11[eleven] EddieVanZant 22:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Characteristic

message: Since it has been confirmed that this game won't be able to take advantage of the Nintendo Wi-Fi connection (at least not at launch), the cover art should be replaced with the version without the Wi-Fi symbol near the top.
I agree, but I don't have a version without the symbol. Somebody surely must. And sign your posts. —↑Darklinkskywalker|Talk_|i did this stuff_↓ 03:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover Art
Talk:Porsche 901

message: Please don't attempt to merge the 901 with the 911 again. This issue deserves an article of its own, rather than getting drowned in 4 decades of 911 history.--Matthead 20:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: It is right, that first Porsche models used parts from Volkswagen. But the numbers of these models had nothing to do with numbers of the parts. „Porsche 356“ for example is to be traced back to the number of drawing respektivly draft for a sports car. This number was 356.00.105, dating from July 17th, 1947. Spurzem 14:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model-Numbers of Porsche Cars 

message: Not sure if this article is completely accurate.
I can clearly remember seeing some early models badged as 901 in the late 1960's early 1970's. And I can even remember a 1970's Porsche newspaper advert in the UK announcing the change from 901 to 911, coiciding with a re-engineering of the body and a general "beefing up" in style. Is it possible that in the UK (where Peugeot had minimal sales at the time) Porsche used the original numbering sequence?
I have to qualify that by saying the UK kids book "Observer Book of Cars" for 1964 clearly calls the model the 911, though presumably this would have used the model names used in the country of origin?
However my memory is clear - some at least were badged in the UK as 901. One in particular that I can remember was an orange, left hand drive model owned by a local hotelier which carried a UK "C" registration plate (i.e. a 1963-64 model)
Olddemdike (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 901's
Talk:Geelong Advertiser

message: The Geelong Advertiser is the oldest Australian newspaper that has continuously used the same title (although it did tack on 'and Squatters Advocate' for a period).  The Sydney Morning Herald is the longest continuously published newspaper but it has changed its name.Bebofpenge (talk) 03:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest

message: Independent Newspapers owned the Geelong Advertiser until at least 2005.  I can find no record of a transfer of ownership to News Corporation and they do not list it as one of their titles on newscorp.com.Bebofpenge (talk) 03:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Greg Locock (talk) 04:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership
Talk:Zosuquidar

message: Incomprehensible. I'm afraid to clean up as I'm not sure what the intended meaning is of many grammatical mistakes. What's going on here? Tamarkot 20:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomprehensible

message: Is the CAS number for the compound as shown or for the drug with the three HCls as shown in PubChem?--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's for the free base. The trihydrochloride appears to be . Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CAS number

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Minimac (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem