lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gabriel Richard Catholic High School

message: * Strongly Opposed.  Reason: well - There is a significant problem with moving Gabriel Richard High School to "Father Gabriel Richard High School".  There is already another school, in Ann Arbor, MI., which uses that name.  See Gabriel Richard Catholic High School (Riverview) -vs- Father Gabriel Richard Catholic High School (Ann Arbor).  They are separated by about 25 miles as the crow flies, or 34 miles using the freeways, and they are in the same Catholic High School League Conference.  Father Gabriel Richard is located in Washtenaw County, Michigan, in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Lansing, while Gabriel Richard, in Wayne County, Michigan is in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Detroit.  Moving the information about the Riverview school to an article with the name of the Ann Arbor school, would undoubtedly lead to significant confusion, if not fisticuffs among the opposing students from the respective schools.  Recommendation:  Do NOT Move.  If an article needs to be created for the Ann Arbor school, then it should be called Father Gabriel Richard High School (Ann Arbor, Michigan), and then perhaps rename the Riverview School article to Gabriel Richard High School (Riverview), to avoid the confusion.  --T-dot ( Talk/contribs ) 17:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely oppose for the reasons cited above and the fact that the school does not use the "Father" in the name. We could disambiguate them as suggested if an article is written for the Ann Arbor one or we could just add an  type template (there's quite a few) to the top of both. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 19:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Nomination withdrawn.  My bad, wrong school...EagleFan 21:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 
Talk:M-45 (Michigan highway)

message: The RD should be expanded some before it's at B-class. CL — 01:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: AADT usually means "Annual average daily traffic" not "Average annual daily traffic" as is currently written in the route description. The MDOT source also uses "Annual average daily traffic", is the prose in error? Also, I'm not sure that "32,376 vehicles were observed" is correct usage, since that number was probably calculated and never actually observed. Even continuous sites add for the week and divide by 7. Saying "observed" makes me think someone sat out there and counted an exact number; that is not what AADT is. Brandonrush   Woo pig soooie! 13:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AADT 
Talk:M-30 (Michigan highway)

message: The RD is rather short for a route that is almost fifty miles long. Once that is expanded, it can be up to B-class again. CL — 01:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:M-147 (Michigan highway)

message: This article has three sentences. This isn't anywhere near start-class yet. CL — 04:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Tonight I added the headings and infobox, referenced the time line in the infobox. I can't figure out from the info on hand where it ran. Google Maps puts the State Prison of Southern Michigan as on Cooper St./M-106, so I can't figure out where the roadway would have been. Imzadi1979 (talk) 23:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll want to take a look at this old topo Strato|sphere 03:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: While I know the Wikipedia editors disallow the use of my (Chris Bessert) website as an "official" source, if anyone is interested in more accurate/precise information, based on copious official Michigan State Highway Department/Michigan Department of Transportation maps and documents, feel free to navigate over to https://www.michiganhighways.org/listings/M-147.html for the actual establishment, cancellation and jurisdictional transfer dates and other information for this highway. Additionally, the map on the article is incorrect as well. See https://www.michiganhighways.org/maps/route/M-147.html for reference. CBessert (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @CBessert: as part of the AARoad Wiki, we've been recreating the base map data for the various highways we cover using OSM data. :commons:Data:M-147 (Michigan highway).map has been uploaded with a new map. The map here on Wikipedia will take a bit to update, but it's already showing the correct shape at . (If the terminus needs a tweak, let us know, and it can be fixed quickly.) As to sourcing, you are correct, but AARW will accept your site as a source because the community has acknowledged you as a subject-matter expert, so I encourage you to join AARW and contribute there. Imzadi 1979 →  20:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information
Talk:Braided monoidal category

message: Anybody willing to fill in this redlink, either by an appropriate redirect, or a new article? Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Braided category]] 

message: I think the usage of \mathcal{C}^{op} in the first sentence is confusing.  In particular, it seems like \mathcal{C}^{op} is being described as the same category as \mathcal{C} but with a different (opposite) monoidal structure, rather than a monoidal structure on the opposite category of \mathcal{C} as described in Opposite (category theory), which is the much more customary definition of \mathcal{C}^{op}.
So, given a monoidal category, (\mathcal{C},\otimes), are we saying that (\mathcal{C},\otimes)^{op} is of the form (\mathcal{C}^{op},\otimes^{op}) or is it of the form (\mathcal{C},\otimes^{op})?
A "natural isomorphism" would mean between two functors between the same categories, so it seems like this would mean that you'd want \otimes^{op}:\mathcal{C}\times\mathcal{C}\rightarrow\mathcal{C} and a natural isomorphism between \otimes and \otimes^{op}.
Thomaso (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about usage of opposite category here
Talk:Ursula Franklin Academy

message: The following snippet was removed from the Ursula Franklin Academy article becuase it does not follow Wikipedia's NPOV guidelines. It is a first-hand criticism of the school.
The students, on the other hand, don't value all of these things, and "high expectations" have more often than not served to foster a sense of animosity towards the higher-level administration staff for their rigid enforcement of certain rules and often their disrespect for the rights of their students. That's the Safe Schools Act Ontario school system in a nutshell, however.
Taylor 07:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australian one-dollar coin

message: I need to know how much is Australia 2017 1dollar value here in Philippines 49.145.236.66 (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia 2017 1 dollar value
Talk:Voice of America Jazz Hour

message: The original article, while a touching story, wasn't suitably encyclopedic and wasn't salvageable, so I rewrote it. Apologies to the original contributor, but I feel that this poor beginning fits the goals of Wikipedia better. Hope I didn't step on any toes.Captainktainer 07:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Larry R. Heather

message: What exactly is an "aspiring politician"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.241.21 (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2014

message: What are his issues with the CHP and the membership standards change? That line needs a citation and further context would be invaluable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Threadnecromancer (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: CHP
Talk:Schoenstatt Apostolic Movement

message: This does not sound as NPOV to me:
"Among other things, it seeks to invite the Blessed Mother (and, hence, her divine Son, Jesus Christ), into the home by establishing a Covenant of Love with her." -- 07:33, 23 April 2006 84.220.60.155
:It seems to be a paraphrase of some of the ideological goals of the movement; it could possibly be better phrased, but I don't see any particular NPOV issues... AnonMoos 13:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I propose changing the name to "Apostolic Movement of Schoenstatt" which is the most official title. 
User32423534215 (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I like the Schoenstatt but the edits today June 17 2009 b a few people read like a brochure and have no references. Please edit them back to make them encyclopedic. Else they will just have to be reverted because they do not make Schoenstatt look good and read like spam. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 17:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it sounds like a brochure, vague and promotional, also there is no mention of the Secular Institute called the Schoenstatt Sisters of Mary who are consecrated lay women, or the Schoenstatt Fathers who are the priest branch.  --Elizdelphi (talk) 07:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I changed them back. History2007 (talk) 07:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Schoenstatt Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130310001459/http://www.microsofttranslator.com/BV.aspx?ref=IE8Activity&a=http%3A%2F%2Fpress.catholica.va%2Fnews_services%2Fbulletin%2Fnews%2F29687.php%3Findex%3D29687%26po_date%3D18.09.2012%26lang%3Den to http://www.microsofttranslator.com/BV.aspx?ref=IE8Activity&a=http%3A%2F%2Fpress.catholica.va%2Fnews_services%2Fbulletin%2Fnews%2F29687.php%3Findex%3D29687%26po_date%3D18.09.2012%26lang%3Den
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
With respect to external links, I suggest that only national level movement websites, and, preferably, only internationally focused websites are used. I recently removed 4 links to diocesan movements, because there could be hundreds of those. Also, schoenstatt.org isn't actually an official website of the movement, but a small group of independent people, but it's probably the best Schoenstatt website there is; so I decided to leave it. User32423534215 (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Heathrow Terminals 2 & 3 railway station

message: The station is called Heathrow Terminals 1, 2 and 3. Here are some sources for this:Heathrow Connect
ATOC
ATOC
Network Rail (PDF). Heathrow Central was an old name for the Underground there. MRSC 07:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Station name

message: Useful citable PDF presentation covering the The Heathrow Tunnel Collapse.  —Sladen (talk) 13:40, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh sources
Talk:Higurashi When They Cry

message: I will admit to lacking familiarity with the work in question, but the simple statement "" seems absurd to me. The further I read through the strangely-titled "gameplay" section of this article the more it comes across as if this article was either written by someone whose definition of "game" includes Moby Dick and Pride and Prejudice or by someone who refuses to accept that a novel can be presented with pixels on a computer screen rather than ink on paper. The term "gameplay" implies the existence of ludic elements that are not only not being described here, but in fact their absence is being described. Regardless, this comes across to me as if the article is trying to push a point of view that visual novels don't count as "real novels" or "real literature" or something to that effect, and I would suggest finding a more WP:NPOV way to present this information. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay?
Talk:Wilhelm Dilthey

message: not a neokantian? really? why? he's not a baden-school neokantian...but that's because he has his own school of neokantianism. this is totally standard as far as i know, so wtf? 82.139.118.122 (talk) 16:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the section headed "Distinction between natural sciences and human sciences" second paragraph refers to Max Weber. From there to the end of the paragraph it should be made clear whether the views reported are Weber's or Dilthey's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhbeck23 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dilthey or Weber? 

message: Dilthey's 'school' was hermeneutics. Epistemological hermeneutics is not a readily recognized school, and in any case merely redirects to a minor subsection of a different name within the overall hermeneutics article. I have changed the school back to hermeneutics. Clean Copytalk 15:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epistemological hermeneutics
Talk:Ironton Ferry

message: "The Ferry connects Ironton, located about 5 miles from Charlevoix, Michigan, to Boyne City, Michigan.[1]" It DOESN'T connect Boyne to Charlevoix, it's at least 15-20 miles from Boyne City. It just shortens the trip to Charlevoix because you're not forced to drive around.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.91.48.77 (talk) 05:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Fisherman's Island State Park

message: LOL - I didn't think this belonged in the article, so I moved it here.
<I>O little island so bereft,
How hast thou come home 
To thy mother's breast 
To nestle there, to rest. </I>
Lady Mondegreen (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little poem moved here from article
Talk:Sirasa Superstar

message: Seperated Voting section from Season Results for clarity. Under Season Results there are many instances of subjective terms and personal opinion present. Comments stating that contestants had "golden voices" are in clear violation of Neutral Point of View. Not everyone can agree on these opinions. Please refer to the NPOV article for information on neutrality and bias.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.24.99 (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Dispute

message: This is biased. Seems like Sirasa TV itself posted this. 
This program was a lame attempt to copy american idol, and then ended up as a money making scam. I think this doesn't even deserve a place in Wiki.
True to the people above, and before it said something about a season 1 having a person called Tashiya De Mel. What this thing had for season 2 and 3, was actually ment to go into season 1 and 2.
The host is horrriiibble... and the judges are major suck ups, they say that every performers good, when the whole reason they're there is to give constructive critisism. And have you seen the way the contestants become big headed after they take part, like they're the greatest singers in sri lanka, when they're not even close. I mean if your gonna copy something as big as pop idol and american idol atleast do it properly and with respect for Sri Lanka.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.160.65.108 (talk) 14:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased

message: The article was adited and the biased parts of the article are removed. The article seems to be more neutral now.
Cie68
Image:CREG STUDIOS ALLRIGHT RESERVED--124.43.132.183 16:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Edited

message: There are some irrelevant links in the External Links section that should not be kept. I'm removing them, stating reasons here below,
* Links to each competitor's personal homepage/ blog -- It is not fair to link only few people's websites. If each competitor is going to maintain a website, are we going to list all of them? Also, please note that external links get NOFOLLOW links, meaning simply you won't be able to increase your pagerank by linking your site here.
* Dead links.
* Links that do not provide any additional information about Superstar.
* Links that appear to be spam (an individual's blog/ youtube channel containing irrelevant videos/ websites that need registration to view content/ etc.)
I'm doing this to improve the neutrality of the article, so the majority will find it acceptable. :-)
Also, you can help by finding related articles from reliable news sources like, online newspapers and magazines.
--සමීර ශාකුන්තල | Sameera Shaakunthala (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Some External Links 
Talk:Battle of Gdynia

message: As far as I can tell most of the first part of the Before the battle section is false. Indeed, the Pomorze Army was to prevent the Germans from breaking through to East Prussia, but it was to hold out for as long as possible, not eternally. From the very beginning it was clear that the Land Defence would fight surrounded and the Pomorze Army was to defend Bydgoszcz and Toruń rather than Gdynia. It's well-described in the second part, which contradicts the first one. //Halibutt 08:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure which part do you see as contradicting. I do agree with your reasoning, so by all means, please change whatever you think is confusing.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for your suggestion!  When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in!  (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold.  Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly.  If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Former talk

message: Failed due to insufficient citations.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class review 
Talk:Comic Yuri Hime

message: I want to add this site in Ex links.
http://83
1rec.blog99.fc2.com/blog-entry-39.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.221.248.237 (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is blacklisted, so it's impossible.--十八 22:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: I don't know wether it is possible but it would be very informative to add the years of serialization per manga especially because the list is just alphabetically sorted.
--2003:EA:5F24:9087:1DA3:5CB9:6F36:1558 (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serialization years
Talk:List of international rugby union teams

message: Shouldnt this be List of national rugby union teams ? Cvene64 08:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: [Imported from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rugby_union#The_rugby_union_nations]
In The rugby union nations section, it says what the different teams are nicknamed. I disagree; the teams, or at least mny of them, are named whatever name is relevant. eg, The Australian Rugby Team are called the wallabies, not nicknamed. √αʑʑρεɾ 03:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you look on the front of match programmes it says "Wales v. Australia", not "Dragons v. Wallabies".  They're official nicknames, but they are nicknames... GWO
This needs to be sorted one way or another. Jazzper is right - some of these are names more than nicknames. The All Blacks, Springboks and Wallabies, for example, are essentially brand names, while I've never heard anyone refer to the Welsh national team as the Dragons [or to the Japanese as the Cherry Blossoms etc]. The WRU presumably agreed with me when they named one of their regional teams the Dragons. I'll wait for others' input - if nobody objects, 'the Dragons' is getting binned.
..........
Removed Dragons, as I don't know one person who uses it, and removed 'nicknamed' from the All Blacks, Springboks and Wallabies.Hippo43 12:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Somebody reinstated "nicknamed" for The All Blacks, Springboks and Wallabies, added back Dragons, and introduced what look like "made-up" nicknames for England and Scotland. I've reverted the changes. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names / Nicknames 

message: I´ve edited the lists of known international teams. Many were simply shifted from one list to another, for example I listed non-IRB members to ´Others´, and deleted others for whom there is no evidence to support the existence of a national team (e.g. Turkey), one (Turkmenistan) even lacks evidence of rugby at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.231.91.181 (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further edits
Talk:Victor DeLorenzo

message: Fat Tuesday, or Shrove Tuesday is called Pancake Day in some places. Saint Faustyna Kowalska had one of her visions on Shrove Tuesday. Coincidence that Victor's albums are named after these related subjects? I think not! -Freekee 04:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: surfing the Wikipedia
Talk:Dexter Southfield School

message: Historically, students have been drawn from some of Boston's oldest families, resulting in the school's reputation as a breeding ground for young Brahmins. Traditionally, most Dexter students, after graduating from what has more recently been called the lower school, have gone on to ISL boarding and day schools, most commonly Belmont Hill, Noble & Greenough, Roxbury Latin, St. George's School, St. Mark's School, and Groton.
----
For some reason DexterCommunication, which I take is an official Dexter representative, removed the above. But, this is true, historically, that is exactly how the school was. I have reverted the change by DexterCommunication, but just in case they try it again, I've added the paragraph here.
71.243.6.205 (talk) 10:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A breeding ground for young Brahmins 

message: Since 2013, the school's name has been "Dexter Southfield," as noted here: http://www.dextersouthfield.org/Page/ABOUT/Mission-Statement--School-History Jtcarpet (talk) 14:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  School name is incorrect
Talk:Leahy Law

message: I think whoever is writing this page ought to change the stub label to   .  Just a suggestion.  --Eastlaw 08:37, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks I will do now.Travb 09:02, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i added the term "ostensibly" to the declarative statement that this law prohibits assistance to entities based on human rights violations, due to the State Department refusing to use the law after it was found that IDF committed atrocities in the West Bank. it is probably a good idea to discuss this here, and i will check back from time to time to see if it is challenged. Daddyelectrolux (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ostensibly