Talk:Multipactor effect

message: # Support — Omegatron 14:49, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I have carried out the merger and left a Redirect at Multipactor. Lumos3 17:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: A resonance is important only in two-surface multipactor, but not in single-surface
multipactor. So to make this article general, I think that the resonance should not be
mentioned in definition. That is why I described two kinds of multipactor in the
mechanism section. --Mindgame123 20:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resonance 

message: A single surface multipactor can occur on a metal surface when a static magnetic field is present. This article seems to imply that only a dielectric surface can sustain a multipacting event, which is simply not true.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.26.28 (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single surface multipactor. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Multipactor effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091224043747/http://conferences.esa.int/03C26/papers/a019.pdf to http://conferences.esa.int/03C26/papers/a019.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: * Information to be added or removed:
* Explanation: This page currently lacks an image. I created an demonstration of the multipactor effect - since I created it using software created by my employer, I figured I would play it safe and run this through the COI procedure.
* References: Not sure what to reference for an image, but here's a conference paper verifying the accuracy of CST simulations of coaxial multipactor 
Thanks for your time! Stephen Murray at CST (talk) 13:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, thanks and sorry for the late reply. For clarity this model just shows one field node (it's a standing wave, so it could have as many or as few nodes as needed). If needed, I can try to replicate the model from the paper exactly, although it might take some time. Stephen Murray at CST (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add image 

message: I've implemented this image, but there are two citation parameters which ought to be activated.
*The  and  parameters. Please enter the page number or  for the page range that the source resides upon, as well as the verbatim text from the source which confirms the operation of the coaxial multipactor as illustrated. Most notably, the illustration in the reference shows all secondary electrons concentrated at two electric field nodes, whereas your illustration only indicates one node. Please advise.
When ready to proceed with the requested information, please alter the  template's answer parameter to read from  to  and enter the information into the reference template which you've added to this talk page. Thank you! Regards,  Spintendo  22:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, thanks and sorry for the late reply. For clarity this model just shows one field node (it's a standing wave, so it could have as many or as few nodes as needed). If needed, I can try to replicate the model from the paper exactly, although it might take some time. Stephen Murray at CST (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 23-OCT-2018