Talk:Indo-Aryan migrations

message: @WikiLinuz - you reverted my earlier edit which stated in the lead section that this is a "theory".
Throughout the article, in numerous sections, there is this mention of it being a theory.
Based on that, I edited the lead section and added the above.
Look forward to hearing back from you... StolenFocus007 (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a fact, not a theory. And we're not talking about scientific theory either. WikiLinuz {talk} 🍁  18:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How can it not be a theory when it is called a theory ? 59.89.154.11 (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

text: It is literally mentioned in the article that it is a theory . 59.89.154.11 (talk) 09:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Theory" 

message: According to geneticist David Reich, Sintashta and Andronovo, the two cultures often associated with the Indo-Aryans and Indo-Aryan languages, did not directly contribute any DNA to India[source]:
"Often in the story told with the steppe hypothesis, the Yamnaya give rise to later groups called the Sintashta and Andronovo that then contributed to India. But genetic data from those populations so far call into question that model, as they do not work statistically as sources of ancestry in India."
— David Reich
[Source] Reich, David (March 2018). "Ancient DNA Suggests Steppe Migrations Spread Indo-European Languages"
Pretty interesting, since the theory focus a lot on Sintashta/Andronovo migrations which apparently did not happen. In the source Reich mentions that Sintashta/Andronovo-related ancestry reached India later than hypothesized, through a later culture that carried it (thus indirect contribution) 46.176.160.196 (talk) 11:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ”In the year since this lecture was delivered, my laboratory and another laboratory have generated new ancient DNA data from Central Asia. With these data in hand, we have been able to show that groups like Sintashta and Andronovo in fact have mixed with some of these newly sampled populations to produce a plausible source population for South Asians.” Chariotrider555 (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics info from D Reich 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Senator2029 【talk】  21:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: FYI: the IVC had already started to decline, due to climate change, when Indo-Aryan people started to migrate into northern India, also due to climate change. The 'Aryan Invasion Theory', bt which you seem to be informed, is outdated and incorrect. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: does one of you care to convince this editor of their misunderstanding? Thanks. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you find your additions reverted, please seek consensus on the talk page rather than edit warring to add it back. I'm removing your infobox and suggest you explain here why you think it necessary. Wait for consensus and, if you get it, then add it back. (See WP:BRD and WP:EW)--RegentsPark (comment) 20:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox military conflict