lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mike DiBiase (born 1977)

message: Ok, I'm sorry but I have to ask.  If his dad's name is TED why is his name "MIKE JR"?
- Because his granddad is mike dibiase sr.
:Having your granddad's name doesn't make you a Jr.  Mike DiBiase II would be more accurate, not Mike DiBiase Jr.  -James Duggan 00:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: II doesn't make sense either, it's not what he's named - his name is Michael Dibiase, he's called Mike - the name of the article is wrong. If anything there should be some sort of parenthesis used to differentiate them, not the "II" since it's not his name, he's not named "Michael Dibiase the second". MPJ-DK (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Junior?

message: It says he is signed to a WWE developmental contract. Is that true? If it is, then he should be listed in the unasigned talent on the WWE roster or in the FCW roster.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.32.168 (talk) 00:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he signed to WWE? 

message: In the article's last paragraph, it says "On December 8, 2008, DiBiase won the NWA North American Heavyweight Championship by defeating Damien Wayne." Unless someone's a psychic, this is the wrong date. I'm assuming it's December 8, 2007, but since I don't know for sure I'm not going to change it. It'd be nice if someone else with more knowledge would look into it. ViolentLee (talk) 19:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a typo. Nice catch! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 8, 2008? 

message: Is there any need for the Mike in the into of this page (Michael "Mike" DiBiase).It seems redunant to me since it states that he goes by Mike in the infobox.Just wondering caue there are many pages like this. (MgTurtle (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I personally like. I believe it's because he doesn't wrestle under his real name, rather an abbreviation of it (Mike is short for Michael), so it makes more sense to say "Michael "Mike" DiBiase is a professional wrestler", than "Michael DiBiase is a professional wrestler better known by his ring name Mike DiBiase". I'm sure you'll agree, that is a lot more redundant than "Michael "Mike" DiBiase. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 06:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike
Talk:Brierdene

message: Is it Briardene or Brierdene? Djmckee1 - Talk-Sign 19:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Brierdene, thought Briardene is a common mis-spelling. (I used to live there). Walkerma (talk) 18:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Has anyone firm prove of this peacock sighting? There are however pheaseants. Thanks ====  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djminisite (talk • contribs) 19:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacocks

message: Does Brierdene really exist? Brierdene Burn and Brierdene Farm both exist and are recorded by Ordnance Survey but OS does not show any area called Brierdene. Google Maps have a label Brierdene at the Brierdene Burn. Local businesses use the name, vis Brierdene Car Wash and The Brier Dene Public House. I have lived in a number of places where there was a common name for a place. Everyone knew what you were talking about but the name didn't appear on any map. When I returned twenty years later the name had fallen out of use. The lack of citations suggests that this is just an unofficial local name - possibly invented by developers when they built the houses.
I would like some evidence that the area exists. OrewaTel (talk) 22:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:University president

message: This page has nothing to do with university presidents in general 132.77.4.43 18:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: I think their should be a section that says what they studied and for how long. Rdrgz 93 (talk) 05:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to study 

message: Anyone have evidence that future politicians have used service as university president "several times" as a "springboard" to political life?  Only two well-known instances listed here.  Wilson certainly qualifies--his Princeton identity was an important part of his first gubernatorial campaign--but Eisenhower used his wartime service as the springboard.  Columbia was rarely mentioned.  Any argument as to why this little section should not be deleted?  --Patchyreynolds (talk) 17:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Springboard to political office 

message: Let's consider changing instances of "university" to "college", including the title of the article. Not every college is a university, and creating a separate "College President" article would be redundant.
-"Tom Something"
Thaflinger (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's consider changing "university" to "college".
Talk:Felbamate

message: At least two references (including the previous edit of this page) describe Felbamate as "trideca-1,3,11-trien-5,7,9-triyne", which is clearly not the molecule pictured.  I have replaced this with the correct formula. 155.92.102.147 (talk) 17:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical Name 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Gnixon

message: I've removed comments from User:Cult of the Sacred Or nge who is a probable sock of Rbj. JoshuaZ 18:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gnixon gets the support of POV-pushers and sockpuppets.  Wow.  Orangemarlin 20:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed comments 

message: :Who's closing the RfC?  You?  Your POV buddies?  Don't think so.  Please note how many people endorsed this RfC?  Orangemarlin 16:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just in case someone was ready to close it, I wanted to ask that they wait a bit.  Gnixon 20:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Continuing your pushing around whatever I write to wherever you want.  Who appointed you Wiki-cop of the year?  Orangemarlin 20:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Has this been closed yet? Bwrs (talk) 00:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC close
Talk:Il Corral

message: The tone of this article seems to be leaning towards non-NPOV. I think it should be rewritten to sound more encyclopedic. hotdiggitydogs 18:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In copy-editing I have Wikified, removed weasel words, loaded terms, blogese and band-site-style non-NPOV. I have added cite requests for unsupported claims. I have changed ‘Partial list of bands that played at Il Corral’ section to ‘Bands that played at Il Corral’ – a ‘partial’ is not necessary… if it’s worth mentioning, we mention it; if it’s not, we leave it out. No “etcs”, “and other”, “such as”, “including”, or anything (eg. partial) that implies these by omission.
The article had/has no citations, so References section removed until references supplied.
This article had lain unimproved for over a year, and was likely to remain so. There has been ample time for improvement if what was/is said is of worth, evidenced, and of national or international notability.
The disinterested, but only apparent, facts remain, but what remains is still un-cited and leaves the article, I believe, not particularly notable.
Acabashi (talk) 14:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 11 Jan 2011 
Talk:Streptozotocin

message: We usually name drug articles after the drug's INN, which for streptozotocin is streptozocin. Is there a good reason why this article isn't named after the INN? Fuse809 (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 19:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this article be named streptozocin, the INN?
Talk:Repaglinide

message: can someone inform about the possible generic status of this drug?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.178.250.35 (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  generic yet? 

message: Recent Updates:
1. Fixed Lead in 
2. Added Medical Uses
3. Added C/I
4. Added Adverse Events
5. Created Special Populations
6. Added PK
7. Added reference to History & Intellectual prop  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 10Lndsy (talk • contribs) 23:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Updates -  

message: 1. Does this draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? (yes/no) → Yes
2. Are the points included verifiable with cited published material? (yes/no) → Yes 
3. What recommendations can you provide your colleague for improvement of their draft?
- Special populations: Re-word (fix grammatical errors) and provide further information regarding the pregnancy case report.
- Lead section: consider adding brief info on side effects and place in therapy 
- Use lay language: instead of “hepatic,” use “liver”
- Check punctuation in drug interactions section
Gracekim9 (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review on edits
Talk:Dicloxacillin

message: Focused on adding references to each section, removing information that could not be verified or not of relevance to the general public, and adding hyperlinks for scientific terminology. We also added the section on "Interactions", including the corresponding references for those. We did not fully edit the mechanism of action and medicinal chemistry sections yet. 
Grp05rx (talk) 22:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by Group 5 

message: This draft submission reflects a neutral point of view.
Most points included are verifiable with cited published material. The Mechanism of Action and Medicinal Chemistry section lack references, but the editors have already provided a disclaimer that these sections have not been updated by them.
Please see the following recommendations below:
* Please provide a source for “However, like methicillin, it is less potent than benzylpenicillin against non-β-lactamase-producing Gram-positive bacteria.”
	
* Please provided a source for “It should also not be used in the eye, or those with a history of cholestatic hepatitis associated with the use of dicloxacillin or flucloxacillin.”
* Please consider clarifying or defining the terms “susceptible bacteria” in “Dicloxacillin is used for the treatment of infections caused by susceptible bacteria.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Policy.4nita (talk • contribs) 16:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review Comments by Group 4
Talk:Auto detailing

message: This article in its current form borders on a how-to piece.RCHM 18:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It still is. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 02:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

text: It's not perfectly encyclopedic yet, but it is very informative to those of us who knew absolutely nothing about detailing a car.  Some info about its history or popular techniques would be great.  Tell someone (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I'm going to start working on this article, adding lots of information. 76.1.70.61 (talk) 21:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic 

message: I would help correct this sentence, but it is missing necessary clues to its meaning; "Products include but are not limited to detergents, degreasers, acid free, detail clay, waxes, polishes, and a variety of applicators, brushes and special plush drying towels."  Questions include "Are products the same as tools?" and "What is 'acid free'?". - KitchM (talk) 03:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence Rework Needed 

message: In what way is cleaning something "detailing" it? We should have an etymology. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: "Detailing" is the American word for it. I don't know the etymology, but like its British equivalent "valeting" it's a fairly recent coining — both words date from the 1970s. Neither one is particularly logical: a valet might press your trousers, brush lint from your shirt, or assist you in putting on your coat, but he would never be responsible for cleaning and polishing your carriage or your automobile. --ABehrens (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any idea why they call it "detailing" instead of valeting? 

message: Waxing a car may be a part of detailing a vehicle, but waxing a car and the products and techniques involved, and the pros and cons of waxing, should all be in its own article with a link from the auto detailing article to it. Currently, this article uses the word "wax" twice but doesn't explain what that is or what it involves or why it should or shouldn't be done. 2601:245:C100:5E5C:C55:9AD6:2FAF:A3EF (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Car wax" redirects here because Azure Auto Detailing specializes in providing top-notch car waxing services, ensuring your vehicle maintains a pristine shine and protection against the elements. For more guided visit our: https://azureautodetailing.com/ Azure235200 (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "car wax" redirect here?
Talk:Pramipexole

message: If anyone else has seen the commercial for this drug, the woman calmly recites that "Mirapex may cause you to fall asleep during normal activities, such as driving". Just how common is this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dogma5 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FALLING ASLEEP WHILE DRIVING?!!!!! 

message: Link 12 doesn't appear to go to the article or page intended. (92.10.108.20 (talk) 19:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced it with a reference to the actual study. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: The second sentence states "[Pramipexole] is also sometimes used off-label ... to counteract the problems with sexual dysfunction experienced by some users of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants.[1]"  However reference [1] "Pramipexole Augmentation of a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor in the Treatment of Depression" (J Clin Psychopharmacol. 20 (2): 274-275.) clearly states in its "Discussion" section that "Pramipexole did not seem to be effective in alleviating sexual side effects in this short trial."  This is the only time the article mentions the efficacy of pramipexole on libido.  Thus reference [1] serves to refute the usage of pramipexole to counteract problems with SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction, not support it.  I was unsure as to whether the reference should be edited or deleted.
Disconat (talk) 21:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in reference (1) 

message: Why are there no mention of these two things? --24.77.9.50 (talk) 22:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RLS/Parkinsons Off-label use, Compulsive gambling as a side-effect 

message: Is it necessary to list the side effects in the opening, then list them again in their own section? I would argue this information is best presented in the side effects section only. Wlduggan (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of side effects
Talk:Eplerenone

message: The Oxford Dictionary defines contraindicate as "to give indications contrary to; said exp. of symptoms in a diasese which make against the usal treatment, or a particular remedy." The verb's earliest documentation was in 1666 in the present participle form. The earliest recorded usage in the indicative form was in 1767 ("The bark, if nothing contraindicates its use, may prove to be very beneficial.") Another example of the indicative form is "their shape and position contraindicate the possibility of any individual movement of their jaw-angles". The verb is usually used in present or past participle forms and I have never seen it used with a subject of the kind "The manufacturer of eplerenone".--Mirrordor 21:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contraindicate 

message: Eplerenone is often used where side-effects from spironolactone are a major problem. This is not borne out by a systematic review: doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.018 JFW | T@lk 08:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In heart failure 

message: "Eplerenone is currently approved for sale in the US, ..."  How old is this information?  I can attest that Eplerenone has been available in Canada for at least 5 years.  I'm sure there must be other countries too.  In the absence of current information, we shouldn't offer outdated info.Doc.Ian (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been prescribed Eplerenone for several years in Australia where it is approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration.  JaimeyTeresa (talk) 10:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction - Approvals
Talk:Lymecycline

message: Hi, for work related reasons i was looking into lymecycline, and the compound pictured here does not appear to be the correct compound.  According to scifinder, pubmed, and the printed edition of the Merk index, lymecycline is the lysine aminal of tetracycline, not 7-chlorotetracycline.--72.85.250.127 (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molecular structure 

message: The beginning of the article reads strongly like patient-directed PR. Also, it should be checked whether there is a pharmaceutical company IP behind any edits. --Sasper (talk) 00:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  PR/COI ? 2014
Talk:Thiotepa

message: See: Acta Tropica 132S (2014) S164–S169
69.125.168.63 (talk) 22:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as a pesticide and sterilant  

message: Ah, thiotepa is the INN (which is admitted in the article) and the drug isn't well-known enough for me to believe this could be a common name exception to the general rule that we use the INN. Besides in Martindale the thioTEPA name appears absolutely nowhere so I doubt it's even a mildly common name as Martindale usually lists all synonyms. Brenton (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 11:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: "Thiotepa" is indeed the INN and the appropriate title of the article per WP:MOSPHARM, though "thioTEPA" is used in some of the references.  I have moved the article to the standard capitalization.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming: ThioTEPA or thiotepa?
Talk:Famciclovir

message: It looks like the pronunciation on this page is actually for Penciclovir.  It should be changed. Andrew.e.gibson (talk) 18:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

message: 2 US patents expired this week ( 5,916,893 and 5,840,763 ).  Are generics available outside USA ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost and generics 
Talk:Aminorex

message: The article states that the synthesis is racemic but isn't it just a matter of using the chiral precursor? Related papers show that their is no structural inversion. See Agami, Claude; Cheramy, Sandrine; Dechoux, Luc; Kadouri-Puchot, Catherine Synlett,   1999 ,  # 6   p. 727 - 728
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.243.179 (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis is Chiral?
Talk:Herbert Seifert

message: "In 1935, Seifert was summoned to a post at the University of Heidelberg, where he took a position vacated by the dismissal of a Jewish professor. During World War II he volunteered for a position at a Luftwaffe research center, the Institut für Gasdynamik. After the war, Seifert was one of the few German professors whom the allies trusted during the period of denazification."
I would like to see more information on Seifert's relationship with and attitude towards the Nazi regime. I would also like to see some information on the attitude of the postwar US government towards scientists who were Nazi collaborators. ---Dagme (talk) 03:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to the Nazis?
Talk:Herbert Storing

message: This article is badly in need of references backing up many of its assertions. And, even with such references, I'm afraid that it raises serious POV questions.
The assertion that Storing "was considered the foremost authority" on the Anti-Federalists needs sourcing (and would be improved by taking it out of the passive voice....who considered him the foremost authority on the Anti-Federalists?).
The claim that "[i]n comprehensiveness and scholarly thoroughness his works are highly unlikely ever to be superseded" is not only unsourced, but also seems highly speculative and far from displaying a NPOV.  If, in fact, someone of note said this about Storing's work, both the sourcing and the NPOV issue could be resolved by quoting that source. Otherwise, I don't think that this claim belongs on Wikipedia.--BenA (talk) 10:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree that this page is unabashedly biased.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.133.141.156 (talk) 16:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is substantial, informative and well sourced.  An administrator should upgrade the status.  It is no longer a stub.  The justified criticisms were made years ago and the piece seems significantly improved since then.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gala1990 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and NPOV 

message: He was very young when he died. I want to know what he died from? If anybody knows. Please add it to the article. Thanks!35.11.207.145 (talk) 09:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Did He Die From?
Talk:Herbert von Dirksen

message: I removed the tag saying this page needs attention from an expert in history. Most of this article is my work, and it seems like one was trying to question it. The Auswärtiges Amt was a very elitist group drawn from the German upper classes with a disproportionate number of aristocrats among its ranks. Dirksen himself fit the profile of a typical German diplomat, coming from a very wealthy aristocratic family, through the Dirksens were very new aristocrats, having had been ennobled by Wilhelm II in 1890, not at all like the ancient Junker families some of whom aristocrats for at least thousand years. There is a very annoying trend on the part of many to insist that Germany's traditional elites had nothing to do with the criminal policies of the Nazi regime, instead portrayed as "sand in the machine" working to sabotage Nazi polices. This claim has been made most insistently about the Wehrmacht, but it has also been made about the Auswärtiges Amt. Just like the absurd claim that the Wehrmacht had nothing with the genocidal policies of the Nazi regime, the claim that the professional diplomats of the Auswärtiges Amt were secretly opposed to and sabotaging Nazi polices has been debunked. Anyone who doubts what I saying should please read the following links:  The machine's accomplices and Historian Calls Wartime Ministry A 'Criminal Organization'. Yes, it is true that individual officers and diplomats did try to overthrow the Nazi regime, but as institutions both the Wehrmacht and the Auswärtiges Amt were bastions of loyalty to the Nazi regime. Dirksen was not involved in the worse of Nazi polices, but he did join the Nazi Party and faithfully served the Nazi regime. Yes, he was an aristocrat and a professional diplomat, but to say that somehow that stopped him from being loyal to a criminal regime is very silly reasoning. Perhaps the picture I painted here is not very flattening portrait of Dirksen, but it is the truth, and if anything is not damning enough. Dirksen was a snobbish anti-Semite who in his memoirs published made a point about boosting that he never had any Jewish friends ever and never joined social clubs that admitted Jews. Not surprising, given attitudes like that, Dirksen found much to approve in Nazi anti-Semitic policies. In no way can Dirksen be considered a conscientious diplomat who happened to be serving a criminal regime that he disapproved of. That reflects the on-going unwillingness of a great editors around here to confront the fact on the institutional level, both the Wehrmacht and the Auswärtiges Amt were up to their necks in blood, faithfully serving the regime that so many of their members approved of.--A.S. Brown (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation