Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Dihydrogen Monoxide 2

message: User:Dihydrogen_Monoxide
    run at Fri Dec 28 10:45:32 2007 GMT
Category talk:         6
Category:              75
Image talk:            4
Image:                 181
Mainspace              2933
MediaWiki talk:        4
Portal talk:           10
Portal:                328
Talk:                  1084
Template talk:         42
Template:              262
User talk:             3382
User:                  333
Wikipedia talk:        500
Wikipedia:             2749
avg edits per page     2.27
earliest               07:58, 15 August 2006
number of unique pages 5229
total                  11893
2006/8   14
2006/9   0
2006/10  0
2006/11  1
2006/12  0
2007/1   0
2007/2   0
2007/3   6
2007/4   354
2007/5   1315
2007/6   1456
2007/7   1902
2007/8   1471
2007/9   1305
2007/10  994
2007/11  1069
2007/12  2006
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
                          Mainspace
92 Age of Mythology
92 Powderfinger
87 Dream Days at the Hotel Existence
61 Internationalist (album)
46 Call of Duty 2
44 I Don't Remember
43 Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties
41 Small Mercies
40 The Chaser's War on Everything
40 Young Modern
38 Odyssey Number Five
32 Queensland Academy for Science, Mathematics and Technology
32 Brisbane
32 Sunsets
30 These Days: Live in Concert
                            Talk:
44 Age of Mythology
42 Powderfinger
26 Call of Duty 2
22 Dream Days at the Hotel Existence
18 The Chaser's War on Everything
13 Powderfinger discography
12 Lewis Mumford
12 I Don't Remember
11 Small Mercies
11 Queensland Academy for Science, Mathematics and Technology
10 List of Powderfinger awards
9  Internationalist (album)
9  Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties
9  PlayStation 3
8  Parables for Wooden Ears
Category talk:
2 Drag songs
                Category:
4 WikiProject Powderfinger
2 Top-importance Powderfinger articles
2 WikiProject Powderfinger articles
2 Australian musical group stubs
2 Start-Class Powderfinger articles
2 Powderfinger songs
2 Copy to Wikimedia Commons
2 Uncategorized good articles
2 Unknown-importance Powderfinger articles
2 Powderfinger side projects
2 B-Class Powderfinger articles
2 Far Out Corporation albums
2 FA-Class Powderfinger articles
2 WikiProject Powderfinger templates
2 Powderfinger articles by importance
                    Image:
4 Internationalist powderfinger.jpg
4 Powderfinger-Don't Wanna be Left Out-18s.ogg
3 Parablewoodenears.jpg
3 D.A.F..jpg
3 Bel canto.jpg
3 Silverchair-If You Keep Losing Sleep-16s.ogg
3 Dream Days at the Hotel Existence.PNG
3 Powderfinger-PickYouUp-24sec.ogg
3 Powderfinger-LoveYourWay-20seconds.ogg
3 Silverchair-Straight Lines (song)-25s.ogg
3 Powderfingerheader.gif
3 Powderfinger-My Happiness-23s.ogg
3 Live powderfinger.jpg
3 Silverchair-Reflections of a Sound-25s.ogg
2 Age of Mythology - The Titans Liner.jpg
 Image talk:
2 D.A.F..jpg
 MediaWiki talk:
2 Spam-blacklist
2 Spam-whitelist
                    Portal:
52 Music of Australia
22 Music of Australia/Selected article
13 Music of Australia/Charts
9  Music of Australia/Did you know
8  Music of Australia/Intro
8  Music of Australia/Selected image/2
7  Music of Australia/Selected image
6  Music of Australia/Selected article/3
5  Music of Australia/Music of Australia topics
5  Music of Australia/Selected article/9
5  Music of Australia/WikiProjects
5  Music of Australia/Selected image/13
5  Music of Australia/Selected article/1
5  Music of Australia/Selected image/1
5  Music of Australia/Selected article/10
    Portal talk:
6 Music of Australia
2 Roman Empire
        Template:
80 GA number
24 Powderfinger
21 Powderfinger Banner
12 User Powderfinger
6  Age of Empires series
6  Powderfinger Collab
5  Afc talk
5  Australianmusic
4  Editor-review
4  Make table
4  Powderfinger Invite
3  Adoptsuggest
3  Australia opentask
3  GAR
3  Brisbane tasks
   Template talk:
25 Did you know
10 WP Australia
2  Australianmusic
2  Trivia/Archive 1
2  Powderfinger
                User:
45 Dihydrogen Monoxide/Articles
14 Dihydrogen Monoxide/monobook.js
14 Dihydrogen Monoxide/Sig
13 Giggabot
13 Dihydrogen Monoxide/Awards
10 Dihydrogen Monoxide/Clutter
9  Dihydrogen Monoxide/DYK
6  Dihydrogen Monoxide/Coach
5  Dihydrogen Monoxide/Audio
5  Nehrams2020/GA reviews
4  RazorICE
4  Dihydrogen Monoxide/Powderfinger FT
3  HAL
3  Riana
3  SuggestBot/Regulars
          User talk:
169 Dihydrogen Monoxide
64  Spebi
55  Pedro
52  Husond
52  Lincalinca
50  Jmlk17
44  HAL
39  Ag�eyban�
35  Dihydrogen Monoxide/Header
34  Dfrg.msc
31  Hirohisat
31  Acalamari
30  Daniel
29  Dihydrogen Monoxide/Archive
27  NSR77
                               Wikipedia:
257 Good article nominations
102 Good articles
58  WikiProject Powderfinger
54  Administrator intervention against vandalism
53  Australian Wikipedians' notice board
29  Good article reassessment
28  WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/Summer 2007
25  Requests for adminship/Giggy
23  Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Announcements
22  Requests for adminship
21  Requests for adminship/Dihydrogen Monoxide
21  Bots/Requests for approval/Giggabot
18  WikiProject Age of Empires
18  WikiProject Australian music
18  Featured article candidates/Internationalist (album)
                        Wikipedia talk:
76 Requests for adminship
62 WikiProject Powderfinger
56 WikiProject Video games
49 Good article nominations
19 WikiProject Powderfinger/to do
19 WikiProject Alternative music
18 WikiProject Australia
12 WikiProject Australian music
11 WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Archive1
10 WikiProject Strategy games
9  WikiProject Good articles
7  Good article reassessment
7  Requests for adminship/Reform
7  Articles for deletion
6  Adopt-a-User
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2], [3]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 10:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Dihydrogen Monoxide

message: This isn't a really important question. I noticed that you don't link any of your sub-pages on your user pages at ? For example,
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Clutter
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Satisfying music notability guidelines
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Recall
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Awards
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/DYK
*User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide/IE
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Audio
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/ArbCom votes/2007
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Sig
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/box-header
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/box-footer
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Coach
*User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Archive/August 2007
*User talk:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Archive/July 2007
*User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Articles
So, I discovered that you deleted your previous user page a couple of months ago. Why did you go for the minimalist ... almost blank ... user page?  Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything wrong with not linking; most of those pages aren't important enough to link anyhow. As for the blank userpage, they're the second best design around (after mine, of course ;)). All in all, it's his userspace, he can do what he wants with it without there being a problem (unless he stops contributing everywhere else, or displays the famous Nazi userboxes, of course). · AndonicO Talk 21:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm I don't link to all of mine either.    Dlohcierekim  21:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm neither for or against. I was just curious. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 22:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of those pages aren't used (or may never have been used). /Clutter, /Awards, /Articles, and /DYK are linked via my talk page header, a lot of the others are either for my use, or should be deleted one of these days... :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 00:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: User pages

message: confuses me. It looks like perhaps the comments of multiple editors were removed. Is that a good approach? Did it stay that way? The history is a bit tangled. ++Lar: t/c 22:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, in a response to peer pressure, Majorly changed to support. Rather than striking, she removed her comment and subsequent remarks.   Dlohcierekim  22:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Majorly's a boy but I may be confused. More importantly, don't we normally think it's poor form to completely remove comments of others during RfAs? Perhaps they should have been moved to the talk page? ++Lar: t/c 23:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, Majorly is male. After the comments were removed, a link was placed in their place to the diffs. Avruchtalk 23:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that's somewhat better I guess. Still, conventionally we just strike our own remarks (and if we feel badly about them, apologise) and not futz with other people's words, in these sorts of things. ++Lar: t/c 23:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed my oppose. The rest of the thread was irrelevant, so didn't need to stay. And would have made no sense anyway. I feel I have ruined this RFA. DHMO is a great editor, just has some minor judgement lapses, hence my support. It was a mistake to oppose him. Majorly (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing others' comments is unacceptable unless they violate policy. Saying several times that you are sorry, but have ruined the RfA is not your way of being humble, but a backhanded reminder that you could fail an RfA. However, retracting your oppose, while  begging for your bit back, all at a time when you knew the RfA was failed, removing others' comments and constantly reminding all of us that you feel responsible for the failure of this RfA has shot any credibility you once had. This time, it didn't take chat logs. This time it took an overzealous badgering of supporters and a fanatical flip-flopping of opinions and edits to ensure that you truly can't be taken seriously again. You are truly my lamb and martyr. the_undertow talk 09:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsure where you think I begged for it back. Like any admin who resigns uncontroversially, I asked on the 'crat noticeboard. I am entitled to that sysop bit, I don't have to "beg". And no, despite belief to the contrary, I cannot fail an RFA. That's a bureaucrat's job. Even if I hadn't participated, there was a lot of opposes unrelated to mine, so it would have still failed. I had credibility once? Yeah, right. I've been hated by so many people on this site for a long time, hence why I went through RFA again. Because of my stupidness, I lost friends, respect, and I'd like to thank the_undertow for bringing this up yet again. It makes me feel LOADS better. Thank you! (And in case anyone who can't detect online sarcasm is around, that is, indeed sarcasm) Majorly (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Ah well, don't blame yourself alone :-P Some other folks contributed, and my prominent link to the TRE review probably didn't help. Still, have you got this watchlisted? He gets closer each time, right? Next time is a cinch. Avruchtalk 00:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL! Sounds good. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 01:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Hey Avruch, I mentioned the TRE review first (I'm opposer #1, now that the previous two opposers *cough* "chickened out"). Don't take credit for ruining his RFA; I don't mind, I've opposed every one of his RFAs, but he knows it's for his own good. If/when he's ready, I'll be nominating (Riana and Anonymous Dissident are biased, noticed they're both Auzzees? The Auzzee Cabal is up to something... I can smell it. ;) ) · AndonicO Talk 04:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Then you need a better nose AndonicO...:) the AusCabal Co. Pty. Ltd. Inc. doesn't exist... --— Darkfallstalk 04:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd believe you if you weren't in the Auzzee Cabal yourself. ;) · AndonicO Talk 04:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:TINC! oh, and Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi (currently could be a member of the WP:BRC if someone took a picture.) Happy New Year. I assume this thread is about done now? ++Lar: t/c 19:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Done? Far from it! I'd like to see Lar in the BRC though...— Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You absolutely would not, trust me. ++Lar: t/c 23:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's this, then?