lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Irrealism (philosophy)

message: Older discussions from before the page was split have been archived at Talk:Irrealism/Archive2.
Even older discussions from before the page was split have been archived at Talk:Irrealism/Archive.
Please also see the discussion at Talk:Irrealism (the arts).
----
Disambiguated page. --cfp 11:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

message: My title for a first section sucks horribly. But please rename it. I had to try something to shrink down or give a first paragraph. (wiki style stuff) Lsjzl 15:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mine is only slightly better. If I think of something else, I'll addJoseane 20:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Breakup

message: Please don't make deletions without asking permission - let's agree on changes! Joseane 05:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the line that required a citation as I felt it didn't really add anything to the text. Anyone upset? 4us 20:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Random deletions

message: SHOULDNT THIS PAGE BE MERGED WITH ANTI-REALISM?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrozenMan (talk • contribs) 20:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: The lede merely states that "Irrealism is a philosophical position first advanced by Nelson Goodman. . ." while failing to actually explain what this philosophical position actually is. Likewise, the first section begins by stating what the philosophical position was motivated by and then that it is distinct from anti-realism—all while again failing to explain in clear terms what this philosophical position is. We are asked to get a sense for what it is in a roundabout way. This article needs to be revised for clarity. Sol Pacificus (talk) 05:34, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fails to explain what irrealism actually is
Talk:Morrisville, North Carolina

message: Section is just an unsorted list. I did some quick checking and see stuff like this for 2014 and looking back at 2012 using the wayback machine. IBM ( sold business line to Lenovo ) and Nortel ( pieces of the company sold to different local companies ) used to be bigger employers in the area. Seems like there should be some better sourcing that would also let us turn the section into prose. PaleAqua (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employers 
Talk:HMS Carnarvon

message: The photograph of Carnarvon with the submarines is currently dated "...sometime between the 1915 commissioning of the submarines and the 4 May 1917 sale of H6 to the Netherlands."
HMS H6 ran aground on 19/1/16, and seems to have been interned in the Netherlands from then until the sale. Carnarvon spent all of January 1916 on the American side of the Atlantic, so it's very unlikely this picture was taken that year. Looking at the 1915 logs, it seems most likely this is June-July at Halifax (lots of "in floating dock" and submarines around) - but in any case, it's definitely 1915 and no later. Andrew Gray (talk) 13:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph date
Talk:Mogul skiing

message: According to WP:NOT#IINFO:
While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instructions or advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, video game guides, and recipes.
It seems that according to the policy, this section should be removed. If nobody objects, I will remove it. Jhinman 04:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic Techniques 

message: I'd be interested to hear about the origin of the term "mogul" in this respect. Pimlottc 03:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: A brief discussion here has agreed that "women" should be used consistently across all Wiki-pages concerning FIS competitions. Therefore I changed ever in-text mention of "ladies" to "women". Judith Sunrise (talk) 17:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ladies -> Women
Talk:Virginia State Route 67

message: Additions:
;Russell
9.28+3.19 (1936)
*1932 5.52? SR 111 near Honaker towards Raven
*1934 3.76 towards Raven
*1938 3.22 to Tazewell County
This adds up.
;Tazewell
4.51 (1936), now 1.61+7.95
*1930-31 0.89 Richlands towards Jewell Ridge
*1932 4.11 towards Jewell Ridge
*1937 3.00 to Buchanan County
*1938 0.80? Raven to Russell County
This adds up (note that west of US 460 is now longer than it was).
--NE2 19:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tree of Life (Bahrain)

message: There are free images on Flickr here. There is no need to include fair use images. Mohamed CJ (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I have reverted to the December 24, 2012 version of the article, as I note in my edit summary. The new references provided don't back up the claim that this tree is "proved" to be the site of the "Garden of Eden." The prose is also unencyclopedic. There may be some good material tossed out with the bad, but as for now we need to start this article expansion over very carefully. Jusdafax  05:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  My revert to December 2012 version - recent additions deeply unencyclopedic
Talk:HMS Fiji (58)

message: Does the Royal Navy call them "Crown Colony" or "Fiji" class? José Luiz  talk 23:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . José Luiz  talk 23:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Crown Colony. Many post-war authors use Fiji class which explains the confusion.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a RN source on that? José Luiz  talk 14:38, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

text: I am asking because there is a huge discussion going on in some fb group about cruisers and people will probably try to edit here to that effect, as you are probably noticing. José Luiz  talk 18:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've asked for a source. Dunno when he'll respond.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crown Colony?
Talk:HMS Hurricane (H06)

message: Regarding the rescue of survivors from SS City of Nagpur: Discrepancies on dates (1 April vs 1 May), number of survivors rescued (463 vs 451) and landing location (Gourock vs Greenock) in this article and the one on SS City of Nagpur.  Neither number of survivors does not make sense with account in the SS City of Nagpur  article (463 total passengers and crew, 13 ratings and 1 officer killed in the engine room and one deck crew member killed on deck sould yield a maximum of 448 survivors). DavisGL (talk) 16:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: English is quoted accurately as to number of survivors and date. Doesn't mean that he's right, but it is verifiable.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Hyperion (H97)

message: Rippon, 1998, states that Hyperion was built with a Johnson boiler as a trial, instead of one of its three Admiralty three-drum boilers. Does anyone know more? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Johnson boiler]] 
Talk:HMS Intrepid (D10)

message: HMS Intrepid played a role in the Altmark incident. On 16 February 1940 intruding the Norwegian waters together with HMS Ivanhoe at 15:56 she tried to board the German tanker but the attempt failed. Cause of this the Altmark steered into the Jøssingfjord where during the night was attacked by HMS Cossack.
-Andreas P 15 (talk) 08:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altmark-incident
Talk:HMS Imogen (D44)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-29I-Imogen.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:HMS Imperial (D09)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-29I-Imperial.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:HMS Hereward (H93)

message: Small error in the Article, H93 HMS Hereward was originally built with a twin 4.7 inch CP MK XIX in the B position, and was fitted for but not equipped, a single 4.7 in A position. The twin mounting was removed at the start of the war, and single 4.7 installed in A and B positions. I assume that this is way she was in the Dockyard during the Norwegian Campaign. 10/07/2019  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew381968 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: See the first paragraph of the service section; the mount was removed well before the start of the war.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Grenade (H86)

message: This article variously refers to its subject (the ship) as "it" and "she".  This should be made consistent, whichever one is chosen.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronoun 

message: I removed the "for other..." template as it pointed to HMS Grenade, which is circular.  The only other one I know is the WW1 paddle minesweeper (the hired MacBrayne paddle steamer Grenadier, which doesn't yet have an article. Davidships (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another HMS Grenade
Talk:HMS Havock (H43)

message: This article seems to be at odds with a library book (The Battle of the Atlantic,  Terry Hughes & John Costello, 1977 ISBN 0 00 216048 10) I have: 
'On 31 August 1937...she was attacked with torpedoes fired by the Italian submarine Iride' (article)
...'of 31 August 1939...HMS Havoc was narrowly missed by a torpedo from a trigger-happy Italian commander.' (book)
Four things stand out: 1) The dates do not seem to tally. 2) The number of torpedoes fired do not match either. 3) Italy did not declare war on Great Britain until June 1940; so what was an Italian submarine doing firing at a neutral British ship? 4)This article has gained a 'k' in 'Havoc'
Or are the article and my book both wrong? Has anyone got the answers?
RASAM (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right or wrong 

message: A couple of questions relating to the grounding. Is there any indication of what caused the destroyer to ground? Why was Havock carrying passengers when she ran aground, and is it possible to identify who they were? Nothing too detailed, only as broad as "civilians evacuated from Malta" or "troops heading for Gibraltar". Also, is there any information on the number of people captured by the Vichy French, and what happened to them (i.e. A personnel and B passengers, interred at C, returned at end of war/liberated in the Glorious Advance of 194D?)? Answers are not necessary for the B-class assessment, but it'd be nice to know. -- saberwyn 23:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason for the grounding is given in any of my sources. No solid info on numbers of crewmen/passengers or even who the passengers were. Though I'd presume seriously wounded/technical types. They were released after Torch, though several had died in captivity according to non-RS sources.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Grounding questions
Talk:HMS Cossack (F03)

message: Three pennant no's are briefly mentioned in the text, so I have changed the info box to match; (the original no in the info box, 'lo3', didn't match the no in the picture either), but I am still puzzled as to why Cossack had those three numbers as there is no more enlightenment in the text.
Clicking on the Times references results in the article for that newspaper; clicking on the 'Airfix' reference merely produces a 404 error page.
RASAM (talk) 21:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennant numbers and references 

message: Perhaps it's a 'sea story', but the ship allegedly picked up a cat that survived the sinking of the Bismark, and was kept as a mascot until the Cossack itself was sunk somewhat later.
71.83.153.74 (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sam the Unsinkable
Talk:HMS Jersey (F72)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-37J-HMS_Jersey.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Nigel Ish (talk) 23:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.uboat.net/allies/warships/ship/4452.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  23:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:HMS Kandahar

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* The link to the position 32.95,14.316667 on Google maps brings up a message saying the address cannot be found, however if you copy & paste the co-ordinates into the Google maps search bar directly then it will work.  I think it may be because the link includes the article name, which GM doesn't recognise but I am not technically-minded enough to know how to change it!
Kultofkylie (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The GeoHack link works for me. Is anyone else having trouble with it? Deor (talk) 10:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see the problem now. You're referring to the "View this location in Google Maps" link at the top of the GeoHack page rather than the links to Google Maps down in the "Global services" list. I'll ask the folks at Wikiproject Geographical Coordinates what the problem is; I'm too inept with technology to figure it out myself. Deor (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error in Google Maps
Talk:HMS Battleaxe (F89)

message: Was this ship involved in the Falklands War? If so, the activity should be added to this article. Regards, DPdH (talk) 09:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not, although I can't find a professional source. It appears it was either held back in UK territorial waters to boost the home fleet, or pulled back due to shaft problems, or stationed off Belize. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falklands war? 

message: Battleax appears the Tom  Clancy book Red Storm  Rising 2600:2B00:8212:5300:D4ED:2562:55B:77C8 (talk) 00:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:HMS Brilliant (F90)

message: There's a UK MoD report - here - on the carriage of nuclear weapons by elements of the Falklands task force. HMS Brilliant was one of the ships discussed. Is that worth adding as an item here? MadScot666 (talk) 04:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been persistent rumours for a number of years about the threat of nuclear attacks during the war. As I understand it, Cordoba was the city threatened. However, I have little concrete on this, so I can't add it. Suffice to say, that if Cordoba had been bombed, it would have drawn in Latin America, and added an international element not previously present. China and the Soviet Union might have become involved, and the anti-nuclear lobby would be outraged. It never happened thankfully. --MacRusgail (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Carriage of Nuclear Weapons during Falklands War
Talk:HMS Turbulent (S87)

message: some news:
http://www.navynews.co.uk/news/1257-turbulent-times-in-the-middle-east.aspx
Cibwins2885 (talk) 09:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the salient points from that reference to the article. Antarctic-adventurer (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Margaret Fountaine

message: This is only the second article I have created, if you see something that I've done wrong, please let me know, as I want to learn. Terri G 11:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fountaine, Margaret Elizabeth  [1862- 1940]
*  1911a.	Remarkable aberration of Terias elathea. Entomologist 44(575): 153-154 (April) [Jamaica]
*  1911b.	Note on the roosting habits of Heliconius charitonia. Entomologist 44(583): 403-404 (December) [Jamaica]
*  1913.	Five month's butterfly collecting in Costa Rica in the summer of 1911. Entomologist 46(601): 189-195 (June), (602): 214-219 (July) [general]
*  1980.	Love among the butterflies. The travels and adventures of a Victorian lady. Boston, Little, Brown and Company. 224 pp., pls., figs. [Spanish translation, 1999] [general]
*  1986.	Butterflies and late loves. The further travels and adventures of a Victorian lady. London, Collins. 141 pp., frontisp. [general; Neotropics]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.82.119.165 (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papers and books 

message: If anyone is interested, the latest issue (Summer 2018, Vol. 60, No. 2) of News of the Lepidopterists' Society (pp. 84-87) discusses Fountaine's two trips to Cuba in 1910 and 1931. A photo is included.
Cheers. 2600:1011:B150:90A8:E04F:76E8:36A1:109E (talk) 04:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuba Trip
Talk:HMS Locust (T28)

message: Can we expand the role of Locust in this?  I understand that some recent research has put forward a whole new theory justifying the Dieppe raid, that of attempting to seize a new 4-wheel Enigma machine, and Locust should have taken a pivotal role in this. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dieppe Raid
Talk:HMS Mermaid

message: removed to make room for neater list. This information needs to be placed in other articles elsewhere.
* An early Mermaid had John Tyrrell (Oakley) appointed captain on 18 April 1682
* HMS Mermaid (28), launched 1761, was the archetype of the Mermaid class frigates adapted from a French prize by Thomas Slade - 124 feet long, 612 tons, armed with 24 x 9pdrs on the main deck, 4 x 3pdrs on the quarter deck and 12 x ½pdr swivels.  The ship's complement was 200 men.  Construction consumed 64,000 cubic feet of timber, 90% oak, or about 28 acres of woodland.  The total cost to build was about ₤10,000 in money of the day.  Five others of her class were built between 1760 and 1771;  Hussar, Solebay, Greyhound, Triton, and Boreas.  HMS Hussar, a fabled treasure ship, was lost at Hell Gate, New York, 1780.  On 8 July 1778 Mermaid was cast ashore on the Maryland coast at Assateague Island near Sinepuxent Inlet by her captain James Hawker to avoid surrendering to the French under Comte d'Estaing.
--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HMS Resolute (1850)

message: I don't think the desk is really an appropriate picture. It should be either a picture of the ship, or no picture. 209.146.241.93 20:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Previously sorted, but I just removed some more of the desk minutia that belong and are in  Resolute desk.  --J Clear (talk) 12:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny-looking ship 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:William Simpson - George Zobel - England and America. The visit of her majesty Queen Victoria to the Arctic ship Resolute - December 16th, 1856.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 16, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-12-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:William Simpson - George Zobel - England and America. The visit of her majesty Queen Victoria to the Arctic ship Resolute - December 16th, 1856.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: It's not clear what is meant here, but 1.5 nautical miles per day seems a plausible speed - can anybody confirm this? --catslash (talk) 18:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Resolute moved east at about 1.5 knots per day''