lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Geoffrey Palmer (politician)

message: Help! For some weird technical reason, I can't add the following line to the top of the article.  Could someone not cursed by evil please put it there for me?  It's:
:For the British actor, see Geoffrey Palmer (actor) 
Thanks.  -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 17:14, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this article heading have the disambiguation "(politician)" after it? If one said Geoffrey Palmer, I would assume they were referring to the actor.
:I agree with the above. I think the actor is the most famous Geoffrey Palmer, worldwide at least. I don't think anyone outside of New Zealand will have heard of this one, but many more will have heard of the actor. I suggest that Geoffrey Palmer be a disambiguation page, with this article being at Geoffrey Palmer (politician). --Berks105 18:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one objected to this I have moved it to Geoffrey Palmer (politician). Geoffrey Palmer is now a disamb page. --Berks105 18:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Article

message: I've e-mailed Palmer's PA about his title. Under the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, those with the SC title can continue to use it. --LJ Holden 22:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Harbour Chambers lists him as a QC, as does this recent opinion piece by him. Mattlore (talk) 23:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  QC or SC? 
Talk:Def Jam Vendetta

message: From VfD:
I'm doubtful whether it's worth the effort it would take to turn this into a half-decent stub. Deb 17:49, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The current wording in this article is terrible.  It really needs a grammar makeover.
:Someone please describe the characters of this game! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.229.49.145 (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: This article needs to be created. R@y 08:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Def Jam Vendetta (The Fighters)]] 

message: Christopher Judge (Teal'c) is in this game, I haven't played it so could someone who has add in who he is
--Shniken1 13:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christopher Judge 

message: actually d-mob said that the player and ludacris are shit cuz he dont like the player and he mad at luda for loosing. you can tell cuz luda looked back at d-mob.24.59.73.128 (talk) 15:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  def jam tournament
Talk:Grass Valley (company)

message: This article is quite similar to an advertisemnt, especially in the products section. Is it really necessary to describe all of them, and going into the categories so in detail? --Cantalamessa 09:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ads? 

message: History is rather thin. I would like to add more history spanning 1984 - 1999.
At the time (1984) GVG built the world's largest switcher for NASA's Kennedy Space Center, then later for CBS in their NYC studios. I'd say that would be notable, eh?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattbratt (talk • contribs) 15:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More History 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: The page requested is already used for another page. Jojhutton (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2010 

message: What makes this company notable? Article is a series of routine business transactions.Slywriter (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: At the (very) old AfD, there's a claim that "Grass Valley Group virtually invented digital video effects", and further up this page someone says they "built the world's largest switcher for NASA's Kennedy Space Center, then later for CBS". The article basically has nothing about all this, though. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Kampfbund

message: I don't think the DAP grew up to "Bavaria's most powerful political force of 70,000 members". It was a party of 5 men. Any sources for that statement?
(NSDAP became that later.)
NAZI is an acronym?--U.U. 07:18, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
:Nazi isn't really an acronym in the English sense.  It was formed by taking the first syllables from the name of the party (Nationalsozialistische).  That method is fairly common in Germany and Russia, as far as I know. Deleuze 11:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Although this article by-and-large does well, it is not appropriate to make value judgments which might be interpreted by readers as bias.
It is not appropriate to quote the word patriotic. If they were not patriotic, explain. If they were, then do not denegrate someone else's feelings as being invalid. That's what the Nazis themselves did.
Statements such as "They were getting restless" and "Not all members were notified either" and "Adolf Hitler was secretive about many things" are suitable for an essay, or a conversation, but not formal writing in an encyclopedia. There are three problems with the statements: first, they are open to question, but have not been cited; second, they put a "spin" on events that suggest the writer is writing from their imagination about what occurred rather than from a printed source; third, the causality is not clearly established. For example, being "restless" does not imply any specific action will take place -- maybe the boys could have gone out for a few drinks. Being "restless" would not necessarily result in a putsch. (Whereas threatening to leave the movement, say, unless public action was taken, would have a more direct cause-and-effect relationship.)
It's exceptionally important to be clear and stick to facts regarding Nazi issues, to avoid raising unwarranted emotional responses that might feed the very irrationality they, themselves represented.
67.180.48.127 (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of being strictly factual and professional on this issue 

message: Why do you just relate to those nazi kampfbunds? There are actaully a lot more just because its a more general german term. E.g. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kampfbund_Deutscher_Sozialisten (german link - i dont know english sources).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.217.160.154 (talk) 08:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other "Kampfbünde (Kampfbunds)" 

message: In the September_1923 article we can read the date of september 25 for the formation of the Kampfbund, but here we read september 30. Which of them is correct? Theklan (talk) 17:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:List of Roman battles

message: I'm wondering, does anyone have information regarding a curious battle: a confrontation at the river Jaxartes in Parthia of Roman and Chinese expeditionary forces, the only such clash in history? It was in the middle of the II century AD, I think, and as far as I remember, the Chinese were victorious.
Silencer
Yes, I heard about it, although I think there are differnt version on whom was victorious. As far as I know the remnant of Crassus campaign against Parthia, all POW at that time were made military units to fight in the East and encountered the Chinese (whose empire went far more west at these times into the Fergana valley). This is no battle of the Roman military as they were Parthian troops fighting the Chinese. Ask the Chinese military history task force more about it. Wandalstouring 22:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confrontation at Jaxartes

message: while in articles we usually have battles grouped by wars or camapigns we should also indicate to which chain of events these belonged here. Wandalstouring 22:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  grouping by wars 

message: Why, in AD 69, is the defeat of Jewish rebels that led to the destruction of the Temple not mentioned?  I recall a certain Titus building his reputation on that campaign, as well as the Roman mint striking coins commemorating the defeat and renaming of the region to Palestinia.  Is this inconvenient?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.236.149.246 (talk) 04:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign in Judea 

message: I think it might be useful to seperate Roman battles from Roman sieges, and possibly even those from Roman naval battles.  So, instead of one long list of Roman battles, we could shorten it, and have three three lists: Roman battles, Roman sieges, and Roman naval battles. What do people think? Or perhaps a better question, do people think anyone would be willing to do the extensive editing of this page and the creation of two new lists that this proposition involves? Andersao (talk) 22:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating new list for sieges and naval battles? 

message: Why are there some greek battles with out any roman involvement? I want to get rid of them but I feel like I should not just delete them  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImVeryAwesome (talk • contribs) 00:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek Battles
Talk:Alamo (disambiguation)

message: The disambiguation pages of The Alamo and Alamo should refer to the same page, in which case the page Alamo would be the logical choice in my opinion. The Alamo should then redirect to Alamo. Basten (talk) 03:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  76.183.217.188 (talk) 03:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Ditto. --EEMIV (talk) 16:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto, but isn't Battle of the Alamo the primary topic? I.e., Alamo and The Alamo should both redirect to Battle of the Alamo, and the combined disambiguation page should be at Alamo (disambiguation).--Kotniski (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, so I'm going to do this.--Kotniski (talk) 12:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Charlie Sheen

message: As of this writing it is missing Beyond the Law (1993 film) in which he plays lead character Dan Saxon. 70.121.87.170 (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: For the "Other ventures Section":
It would be relevant if the information was added about Charlie Sheen's streaming web show "Sheen's Korner," launched March 5, 2011. Tagline "You're either in Sheen's Korner or you're with the trolls."
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1859284/
This article should also mention Sheen's venture as a published poet. His book "A Piece of My Mind" with illustrations by Adam Rifkin was self-published in 1990. https://www.gq.com/story/charlie-sheen-poetry-a-peace-of-my-mind HolyPablo (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2023 

message: The sentence in question is:  "Sheen has been publicly scathing against former President Donald Trump." The word "scathing" is an adjective, not a verb, and a noun must accompany it for the sentence to be correct. The sentence should be rewritten in a way that still reflects the authors intent of meaning, BUT must either use a noun with the word "scathing" or select a different word. 
Using English incorrectly confuses readers and causes harm to subject. 184.155.184.186 (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect use of English word  

message: In the section "Substance abuse, legal issues and health", the sentence "On November 17, 2015, Sheen publicly revealed that he was HIV positive, having been diagnosed roughly four years earlier.notttt[5]" contains "notttt" at the end and seems to be a typo/error. Bharber9752 (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannolis (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2023 

message: Should this recent story be mentioned in the article? - EclecticEnnui (talk) 07:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His neighbor allegedly assaulted him "with a deadly weapon"
Talk:Saionji Kinmochi

message: ... I merged 'Saionji Kinmochi' and 'Saionji Kimmochi' -- and I have a sudden horrible feeling that I've done it the wrong way around. (Google thinks so too.) Can anyone tell whether this person is better known in the English literature as 'Kinmochi' or 'Kimmochi'? By Wikipedia style standards we should use Kinmochi, but if enough people will be confused by this.... --Aponar Kestrel 20:46, 2004 Aug 8 (UTC)
I added the title of Prince to Saionji's name. Which, he is. Several references to buttress this, if you need it. Tlaktan 01:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Discussion

message: I'm wondering where these dates come from.  I just read slightly different ones (i.e. 1894-96) in an article by Mark Lincicome in the Journal of Asian Studies, (May, 1999) vol.58, no. 2. p.343. --DonaldoKun 12:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minister of Education Dates
Talk:About a Boy (soundtrack)

message: I have added an alternate cover, which was sold in the UK (I have this copy with the cover I have included)...I have also seen in on Amazon.jp (Japan) so I have assumed that it was also sold with the same album cover...Not sure what cover was used in what countries worldwide Seth Whales 22:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beggars Banquet

message: The opening sentence reads “ Beggars Banquet is the 10th studio album by English rock band the Rolling Stones. Released in December 1968 by Decca Records in the United Kingdom and London Records in the United States, it is the band's seventh British and ninth American studio album.” If it’s the seventh in the UK and ninth in the US, where does the “10th” come from? WetcoastTJL (talk) 18:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  10th studio album?
Talk:Konya Province

message: Hi. I prefer to give the extensive info on the "city" on the province page, not on the central district. I think this would be more precise because often the histories attached to the "central districts" or "province capitals" are the histories of the provinces and they overlap. An example of this structure I followed can be seen in Kastamonu Province and Kastamonu. I suggest to follow this also in other provinces as well.--leandros 22:17, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi
Talk:Androphagi

message: There is a wikilink, but it's a redlink, so perhaps a brief explanation in this article would be useful. 86.136.248.48 (talk) 23:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A blot is a Norse sacrificial ritual which has no relevance to this article and should be removed unless there is some objection. Ethan Mitchell (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a blót?

message: On this page, the Androphagi are described as if they were likely real, with only a statement that this was reported by Herodotus as a clue that this might be uncertain. However, on the page Anthropophage, the Androphagi are reported to be the same as the Anthropophage, and are said to be mythical, with no suggestion that they might be real. Should these pages be merged? Also, does anybody know which they are believed to have been, and with what degree of certainty? Filksinger (talk) 22:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mythical or Real?

message: This article is extremely underdeveloped and does not give enough information on its archaeological and ethnic subject. The article only relies on a single source as its reference as well. This article needs an expert of the subject to help- expand the article to its full potential.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert Needed 

message: Our article is treating "Androphagi" and "andropophagi" as synonymous, but there seems to be no source cited for this idea, and it may be original research.  Or maybe our article title is wrong.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  17:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing "Androphagi" and "andropophagi"
Talk:Wave (audience)

message: I've never heard of it referred to as "the Mexican Wave", it's "a Mexican Wave". The various articles cited seem to use the two terms interchangeably, but I'm changing it as per WP:BOLD. Will Bradshaw (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definite article
Talk:Vladimir Voevodsky

message: Article contained:
:He received his bachelor's degree in mathematics from Moscow State University in 1989
BACbKA commented it out, saying "Commented what I believe is an inaccurate fact. There was no B.Sc. degree in Russia back then. AFAIK he hasn't got a degree from there." Please just change the article, don't leave HTML comments. Make a note in the talk page of any deleted material. -- Tim Starling 00:17, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
:: Thanks for the explanations. I will. BACbKA 09:09, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The cause of death is clearly explained: an aneurysm. Daniel R. Grayson (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1985 Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario leadership elections

message: Does anyone have the exact results for each ballot?AndyL 00:18, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:British Columbia Liberal Party leadership contest, 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Delta Air Lines

message: Delta no longer has the 2nd largest fleet in the world. 98.61.138.184 (talk) 07:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: really? Hamterous1 (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: Delta Air Lines 2804:54DC:8335:FE40:D126:B6B9:401D:3594 (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @2804:54DC:8335:FE40:D126:B6B9:401D:3594 2804:54DC:8335:FE40:D126:B6B9:401D:3594 (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delta Air Lines 

message: Partner airlines are listed under the category “subsidiaries” this is false. 67.42.77.90 (talk) 06:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partner airlines  

message: Delta reportedly no longer uses the "focus city" moniker to refer to select non-hub airports. (See the TPG article titled "Delta adds 11 new Austin flights just weeks after American slashed its schedule there" [Dec. 15, 2023], which I can't add here.)
That said, on Wikipedia we typically defer to secondary sources. In accordance with that policy, I would be in favor of citing secondary sources to refer to certain airports as focus cities—namely Raleigh, Cincinnati, and Austin. Thoughts? --Precision123 (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus cities 

message: new bookings includes 192.94.102.3 (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  bookings 

message: On 04/02/24 UNC booked a demo, Delta airlines was very excited for us to start using new platform. Shoutout to Unc GO SKYHAWKS 192.94.102.3 (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So, on April 2, 2024, the UNC booked a demo, and Delta Airlines was very excited for a group to start using new platforms? - Master of Hedgehogs (converse) (hate that hedgehog!) 18:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  delta trying out new platform for communications
Talk:New Confucianism

message: "The term itself seems to have been first used in the 1970's and was not found before the 1980's."
This is, at the least, very confusing. I don't enough to alter this to make sense, but I hope someone else finds this and has something valuable to contribute.
:I think that's an understatement; I think it does not make any sense at all.—Gniw (Wing) 04:05, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

message: By the way:  before I re-wrote the article, the characters for "New Confucianism" were written twice (with an "or" between them), and the characters for "Neo-Confucianism" were COMPLETELY wrong.  Unfortunately, I don't know yet how to enter Chinese characters into Wikipedia, so I couldn't enter the correct characters for "Neo-Confucianism."  --Bryan12603 06:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous characters deleted but correct ones needed
Talk:Keyring

message: Although a key ring is essentially a very simple device, expanation of such is always difficult. A picture counts a lot. Indeed a picture of the alternate forms where a clasp is hinged to the ring and can be lifted similarly to a bridge to allow a key to be added is probably best described with a picture unless someone is really good with words. Rjstott 04:34, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: no, I think it is an encyclopedia artile because its not explaning a work its info in a actial thing. Think outside the box 09:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Ive left a question at: Talk:Keychain.  Btw, wouldnt it make more sense to merge fob, chain and ring than to further split this article? Sparafucil 08:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keyloop?

message: Something I've always been curious about- exactly who invented the modern keyring, and when? (of course I'm talking about the metal loop type). 76.199.13.11 15:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor? 

message: Do we really need the photo of the clear photo slide with a keyring? Destroyer000 (talk) 12:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNNECESSARY PHOTO
Talk:Annoyance

message: From VfD:
Maeve Wickham  Unsigned entry listed for VfD by Securiger --  SWAdair | Talk  06:03, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it's been much improved. I withdraw my vote for deletion. Securiger 07:21, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: I placed the clean-up tag on this article, it needs it badly but I'm busy with other things right now and don't know where to start.  The language is choppy, with poor grammar in parts.  The article is stubby - little more than a dic def and needs expanded.  It is also inaccurate in places.  Lastly, I noticed a lot of vandalism that's not being taken care of in a reasonable amount of time.  I'll watchlist it and keep an eye out for vandalism.  Someone needs to take this under their wing though. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 19:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are willing to take some of this on, or can recruit someone, that would be appreciated quite a bit. You are 100% correct on all accounts, and it's really just a matter of who is to be the "someone" (willingness/capability/patience/etc.). I'd considered requesting edit protection, but there's not that much here to protect. The article is clearly an attractive vandalism target, as some people seem to consider it "clever" to be annoying with it. dr.ef.tymac 21:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: I think the title says it all.  And the property of being easily angered is called being bad-tempered or irritable.  Petulance is childish anger and the things that go with it, e.g. sulking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.31.167 (talk) 18:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is rubbish 

message: 2601:1C2:4B00:937:5109:CFB6:FB32:9BB7 (talk) 01:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rfl0216 (talk) 02:10, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2018