lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:New York State Route 312

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 19:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: #Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
I don't like the length of this article, but it is comprehensive. This article does meet the criteria anyway. Congrats.Mitch32contribs 02:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article review
Talk:Landsker Line

message: I have added a lot more text, including citations.  I was half inclined to delete all the existing text, since it is covered by my text.  However, I'm aware that to do so might be overly contentious.  I just removed a couple of plainly factually incorrect statements.  I would welcome discussion of what further edits to make.LinguisticDemographer 20:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit of Article 28 Sept 06

message: Please see my comments on Talk:Little England beyond Wales. --MacRusgail 20:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think this article is more valid and more encyclopaedic than Little England beyond Wales, and the merger should work the opposite way from what is being suggested. Deb 22:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Point of view pornography

message: 'This pornography-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.'
- hmm... "expanding" might not be the right word here...
...and the links, are those really necessary?
:Be brave. --Easyas12c 01:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. As you're not a registered user I'll remove the links. One of them doesn't even work. How ever I do understand that such links are given pointing to an example. But of course it is hard to know which example would be most appropriate. Anyone willing to shoot POV pornography for Wikimedia Commons? ;-) Just joking. How ever I do believe that the article can be improved in some ways. Maybe having a peer review would be a good idea. -Easyas12c 01:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links and Stub message

message: I propose that Hamedori and Gonzo pornography be merged into this article. Hamedori is a Japanese term that means pretty much the same thing, and Gonzo pornography is a very similar shooting style. Any opposition? Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I have included :File:Labret phallic coddling.jpg to improve the quality of the article. Any opinions about other photographs we could use? There is also :File:Footjob.jpg which could be used as well, and possibly others. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am deleting the picture, since it is unclear whether the person depicted wants it used here, a well as the person's age. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.61.107 (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Xylose

message: Is Xylose a reducing sugar?
Yes, xylose is a reducing sugar.
The links supplied seem to have little to do with xylose and more with advertising - they should be replaced by more appropriate ones!
Rstenutz 01:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The xylose shown is the alpha-D-xylopyranose. The beta-D-xylopyranose should be shown which the most stable. --Kupirijo 03:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  beta-D-xylopyranose  

message: Zero calories per gram? Reference [9] says no such thing, is ancient (1936), and the entry is contradicted by every modern reliable source.
Xylose has around 2.4 calories/gram. JohndanR (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Wikipedia, not a discussion forum, much useful form of fixing is actual fixing (I've done it, but almost 3 years later). —Mykhal (talk) 22:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Human Consumption, 0 cal/g?
Talk:Zigong Salt History Museum

message: According to sources in the book "Salt - a World History" on page 375.  It was merchants from the Shaanxi province.  Jealous of the Shaanxi Merchants the Sichuan Merchants erected their own guild hall on the banks of the Fuxxi river.  In the modern day - this other guild hall is a teahouse that is part of the museum.  I'll make the corrections.
BTW - they met in the Sichuan province because the salt wells of Zigong were the best in China.  They also met in Sichuan because the salt was taxed in route from the production center (Zigong) to the consumer.  So meeting next the source of production was in their best financial interest.
: Further - the wealthy families of Shanxxi were actually the main investors in salt wells in the area.  Phreakster 1998 16:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shaanxi vs. Zigong
Talk:Antonio de Mendoza

message: Then, sir, if I may recommend you rewrite this article yourself?  Let's see your writing. --76.187.37.109 (talk) 00:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: '''You think??'''

message: a grade schooler could write better!  gadfly46 02:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: These items are SHALLOW
Talk:Olive thrush

message: Hasn't the Karoo thrush also be split into a new species - Turdus smithii. I cannot find any original articles to back this up, although there are several sites referencing the split e.g. http://eprints.ru.ac.za/161/, http://www.worldtwitch.com/cgi-bin/birdbook.pl/noframes/read/63. If this is the case there should be reference here as well as on List_of_birds_of_South_Africa#Species_list and possibly elsewhere too, but I'm not going to jump the gun and be bold, despite the policy.
:well it seems that T. smithi was a subspecies of the Olive Thrush too. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nisc/ostrich/2003/00000074/F0020001/art00001 --Melly42 22:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Marcos de Niza

message: It is inaccurate to refer to Marcos de Niza as French, since Nice was ruled by the House of Savoy until 1860. L'Ascolano 13:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not French

message: The rock insciption in Phoenix is believed to be a forgery, because Marcos de Niza is beleived to have never come close to present-day Phoenix.Plazak 21:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More precisely, it is a modern forgery, probably from the 1930's, reproducing partially an inscription found on "Inscription Rock".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.144.229 (talk) 13:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The wording that the rock inscription "is believed to be a forgery" is accurate. The preceding comment contains no citations to prove any work was done to prove its provenance.--Dandlyin (talk) 03:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

text: The wording of the picture caption seems to be redundant > Stone Inscription, thought by some to be a forgery from the 1930's, very often (and perhaps wrongly) attributed to Fray Marcos de Niza[1], located in Pima Canyon near Phoenix, Arizona South Mountain Park.   Good idea to remove to remove the (and perhaps wrongly)? seeing as it already stated some think it's a forgery?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.79.140 (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Inscription forged

message: For more precisions on Fray Marcos de Niza, and more detailed bibliography and list of his works, see French version of "Fray Marcos de Niza" entry in Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.144.229 (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See French Entry

message: "...saw Cibola only from a distance, and his description of it as equal in size to Mexico City was probably exact..."
...eh, in what sense? This seems incredible to me. -LlywelynII (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Equal to Mexico City
Talk:The Lamb (poem)

message: This badly needs references...Zigzig20s 23:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm unable to find any source online to support this analysis:" One interpretation is that The Lamb is a look at childish innocence, and that The Tyger refers to the Devil." All of the critical analyses that I read support the analysis left in the article.--Boweneer (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreferenced 

message: "Jesus Christ is "The Lamb of God" - Blake makes the animal's name be secondary to Christ's name, seeing Christ was ordained to bear the sins of the world from before eternity; therefore it is called by God's name (not vice versa). We are also called by Christ's name: Child:he is the Son of God - from before eternity and we become God's Children through faith in him. In this way the lamb is called by God's name and the child is called by God's name."
This section doesn't make any sense and reads as if it was written by a drunk evangelist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.161.164 (talk) 21:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the offending sentences -- they simply don't make any sense. Mattymatt (talk) 03:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, it makes some sense to me, and I'm neither drunk nor an Evangelist. But it looks like I come too late to this discussion.  192.12.184.2 (talk) 14:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jesus

message: The poem is, what, 220 years old? Surely there's no copyright, and the poem is shorter than the article describing it! Why not quote the text of the poem?
Failing that, why not at least link to the text of the poem? 192.12.184.2 (talk) 14:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no text?

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:William Blake - Songs of Innocence and Experience - The Lamb.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 25, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-12-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:William Blake - Songs of Innocence and Experience - The Lamb.jpg]] to appear as POTD 
Talk:Lotus Cortina

message: This needs to redirect to Ford Cortina. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.188.172.165 (talk • contribs) 21:21, September 28, 2006.
:I disagree. Despite the Ford Cortina article implying that the Lotus Cortina was simply one more model in the line-up, it wasn't; Lotus fitted their own engines/gearboxes to the Ford-supplied bodyshells at their own Hethel plant, and made radical changes to the suspension, as well as replacing many body panels.
:Not only that, but the L-C's motorsport significance means that there's plenty of articles that will want to link directly to this page. The London-Sydney Marathon, the 1970 London to Mexico World Cup Rally, Jim Clark, etc etc.
:What needs to be done is: (a) the Ford Cortina GT picture needs removing; (b) the Ford Cortina article needs rewriting and expanding, and (c) this article needs expanding. --DeLarge 00:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, then. I agree with that. This needs to be rewritten to distinguish the Lotus from the Ford. 67.188.172.165 21:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: What were the disqualified for? RJFJR (talk) 14:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming this refers to the 1966 Monte, it was the headlight rule infringement that also disqualified the Mini-Coopers and Rosemary Smith's Coupe des Dames-winning Hillman Imp. Thereby handing the win to Pauli Toivonen's Citroen</tin_foil_hat>. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_Rally#1966_controversy. Mr Larrington (talk) 21:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Rallying
Talk:Today's Announcement! "The Ninjas' Best 5 Battles of sweat and tears! Enjoy this extra compilation" Special

message: It may be due to my computer, but you cannot see Sasuke properly...You can see his outline and shadow like his previous appearance in the filler episodes. -- hatake
* It's your computer I think. I can see him very clearly though it's very dim. He's wearing the Kimmimaro style Sound Nin uniform that he's wearing in part II so the light blue/white top is clearly visible. Rayfire 17:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vulcain (rocket engine)

message: To Vulcain (rocket engine)
From translation page:Wikipedia:Translation into English/French
Other notes
I don't think this should go to Vulcain. Maybe Vulcain (motor) or something. --Storkk 13:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like Vulcain is the name. The naming convention is to be only as precise as necessary. As there is no other page called Vulcain and it's not likely there will be, the article should be at just Vulcain. I'll be bold. (The old "Vulcain (rocket engine)" will still work.) As a) it says that it is about a rocket engine in the first sentence and b) there are lots of pictures showing a rocket engine, i see no danger of confusion.--ospalh (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing title

message: Hello,
reference 15 (Volvo aero) is not valid. Please fix it.
Thanx --Flanagancz (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref 15 is not valid 

message: June 2017 says "...  Prometheus, a liquid- oxygen-and-methane-fueled engine that would cost 1 million euros ($1.1 million) per copy, or a tenth of what Ariane 5’s Vulcain 2 first-stage engine costs to produce." so the Vulcain 2 costs about $11 M to make. WP article says Vulcain 2.1 nozzle will be cheaper - but what is cost goal for the whole engine ? - Rod57 (talk) 23:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost of engine - versions
Talk:Fleishhacker Pool

message: I suspect that this article was ripped from here:
http://www.sfzoo.org/about/pool.htm
I rewrote it a bit to reduce possible copyright problems, and, I hope, improve encyclopedianess.
I can't find any reference to Esther Williams using the pool except for this one zoo page, so I took her
name out.  Photos of Weismuller and Ann Curtis using the pool are available on the web. Note that that sfzoo.org 
page incorrectly calls Ann Curtis a "movie star of the 20's and 30's"  when she was actually a swimming star of the 40's. Doctormatt 21:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite

message: Actually, this page is wrong af far as dimensions go:
Wood River, IL. had a pool built in 1926 which measured 300 ft x 100 ft. Making it much larger (300X15) 4500 sq. feet larger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.8.202.103 (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the given dimensions are given in metres, not feet. I'll fix it. Graham87 13:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dimensions
Talk:Kingsclere

message: I have added an infobox for the village. I have temporarily placed the images beneath the infobox; when there is text below the infobox they can be integrated with the text Alan Pascoe 21:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Forever Odd

message: To say that this article is a Stub is over stating the case. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why did someone move the plot summary to the end of the article? It should be at the top after the brief description. Voshvoshka 00:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * i fixed the specify area thingy. Voshvoshka 03:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearranging 
Talk:Mount Carmel College, Rosewater

message: I've ha to remove to sections of the article, which unfortunately removes the core of it. In both cases it was a bit borderline - we were looking at good faith close paraphrasing, rather that copy-and-paste, but the paraphrasing was too close, in the end, for me to be comfortable with it. 
With the Administration section there wasn't a lot of doubt. For example, the section stated:
:Mount Carmel College is a Catholic systemic school and as such it falls under the direction of the South Australian Commission for Catholic Schools. This means that the College is governed and administered by the College Board and the Administration Team which are directly answerable to the Catholic Education Office.
The source is quite close:
:As a Catholic systemic school, Mt Carmel College falls under the direction of the South Australian Commission for Catholic Schools. The chief implication of this is that the College is governed and administered by the College Board and the Administration Team which are directly answerable to the Catholic Education Office.
In the history section there was more of an attempt to rewrite, but it was still very close. I was borderline about it, but coupled with the administration section I felt it was better removed. I'd love to see a new history section, though, and I'll help where I can. - Bilby (talk) 11:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphrasing problems
Talk:Tasar

message: I suggest that Tasar be merged with this article.John Dalton 21:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:King of Lithuania

message: well i doubt very much that tehre was an act of coronation as written in the article
:Correct observation. Valentinian T / C 09:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What act of coronation makes you doubt? Mindaugas was crowned, it is well documented. Vytautas and Mindaugas II were not crowned.--Lokyz 10:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Mea culpa, I did found anwers needed:)--Lokyz 10:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Duck Factory

message: Nobodys looked at this yet
This has to be one of the most underestimated TV series EVER.
First of all about animation and some true talents of it in ACTUAL PEOPLE Daws Butler and Don Messick... plus the truly gifted cracker jack charter actor Jack Gilford. 
Not to mention the completely unnoticed debut of Jim Carry.
It really was a potentially stellar show NBC never even began to promoted (it's just cartoons what studios have always said) and few noticed unfortunately given the lead into Cheers as I recall not follow, and even it was just gathering mainstream steam.... but what a treat of actually see fading until then unseen past animation history  (voice Daws Butler shortly before his death and not old but very talented Messek)  and things to come (in the case of debutant Carry who as even the show portrays wandered off the bus into Hollywood starring roll he really had) The Cheers following Night Court had a much better  chance but also slow to get up to steam but had that didn't change channel lead... Duck Factory never had the chance of.
 And while a failure for all others historically involved, in the case of Cary at least evidently the Wayan Bros and (just thinking of lauching)FOX were watching him 2 or 3  years later ended up the only white guy on In Living Color... or Jim Carry might still be a no one, at least he caught the wave though show failed and the veterans lost their last well deserved gasp...Daws and Jack died not long after, and again odd the series started with the death of the Duck factory studio owner. Again that Carry just wandered into as this as the pilot script was written ` and got him so notice despite the failure.... a generational hand over and look how much CGI animation (MASK) and and live (psych) animated character roles been in since so adapted for?
I would love to hear him at length comment on that connection, and actually in short clips have heard him give credit to the LUCK of DUCK Factory.
And again for an first time actor luck of starring roll you are talented and just did what we already wrote flawlessly and with VETERANS of the absurd (Cartoons are and again actual people involved) to work with... what a glorious place to start.
 
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.7.200.145 (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Animal trial

message: Can anyone verify anything in this article? We need citations. -- 22:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: ... that makes Wikipedia great.  We need more articles like this one.
Some day I shall write an article about  Barthélémy Chassanée, a French attorney famous for defending animals accused of felonious crimes.
--Seduisant (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the stuff 

message: The accounts of animal trials seem to be restricted to Catholic France. I think that it may be misleading to refer to Europe as a whole.Royalcourtier (talk) 21:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This whole article is a series of gross, unlimited generalisations, which often directly contradict each other. In one place it is claimed that animals did not have legal defence in criminal trials, and in another place that they always had criminal defence. The entirety of human history is treated as singular. 2A00:23D0:E6F:7101:CCBD:5C5D:2D61:D0D1 (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe? 

message: the page currently says
:During the Napoleonic Wars, a French ship was wrecked in a storm off the coast of Hartlepool. The only survivor from the ship was a monkey, allegedly dressed in a French army uniform to provide amusement for the crew. On finding the monkey on the beach, some locals decided to hold an impromptu trial; since the monkey was unable to answer their questions and because they had seen neither a monkey nor a Frenchman before, they concluded that the monkey must be a French spy.
As if the people in 18th century England were unaware that the nation they were at war with was populated by fellow humans. I could see if this happened in 6000 BC and the people of Britain thought that they were an island of humanity, and that other species each had their own nations too.  Putting it in early modern history is absurd, however.  I think the page is better off without this paragraph.  —Soap— 05:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is so obviously wrong
File talk:Orson.scott.card.JPG

message: I'm curious if it was an intentional decision that the photograph of someone often accused of homophobia is one in which he appears to be smiling while leaning on another man's shoulder (I say "appears" because there's the possibility, however remote, that it's a woman to his right). That would be sort of cool. Stilgar135 22:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is interesting.  I came to this article to read about Card, not really knowing anything about him and saw the picture and saw something about Sexuality in the TOC and thought, ok, he's homosexual, that's fine.  I was somewhat shocked to read that its the other way around.  So in a way the picture is very misleading. -- Suso 11:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tazewell Thompson

message: Notability of this person must be established per WP:BIO from WP:RS, or the article can be deleted.  Sandy 22:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tazewell Thompson. DES (talk) 05:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability