lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Scratch Messiah

message: I really think this article should be merged with the main Messiah (Handel) article as a subsection.  It will never be very long and would work well as a subsection over there.  Any dissent? Fred 16:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only that the Messiah article is already quite long without this, and if people do feel inclined to add information about notable Scratch Messiahs there may be pressure not to include it in the main article.  Also, the main article doesn't say much about serious performances (main recordings, famous concert-hall productions) so that highlighting the nonsense version there could give the impression this is the normal mode.  Other views? --Doric Loon 19:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to expand the Messiah article such that it's not such an issue of balance.  I think that because Messiah has such a great amateur performance tradition -- and thus is an important part of the life of the work -- it makes sense to include this information in the article itself.  Or maybe to have a subheading in the main article that links to this one better than the arrangement that we have now.  Either case, I'll get back to work over there and revisit this later.  any other thoughts? Fred 22:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, make the necessary improvements there, and it will become obvious what needs to be done here. --Doric Loon 09:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with messiah 

message: At present the article states, though without citing a source: "The name should by no means be confused with the experimental scratch orchestra tradition, but rather derives from the idea of cooking from scratch." Having read what Wikipedia says about scratch orchestras, I imagine it is very plausible indeed that the term "Scratch Messiah" was taken from there. Of course, both probably go back ultimately to the idea of doing something (but why cooking?) "from scratch", but  that doesn't mean there's no connection between them. --Doric Loon (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: With that in mind, I've moved scratch orchestra to the see also section. Cnbrb (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scratch Messiah and Scratch Orchestra
Talk:Geography of Beijing

message: In addition to the Haidian District, do the Western Hills comprise any of the Changping District, the Mentougou District, or the Fangshan District? Badagnani 16:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: epic fail. you contradicted yourself right there. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 00:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography question

message: Why are the Haidian District, Chaoyang District, Xuanwu District, and other districts of Beijing not mentioned? Badagnani 16:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Haidian District]]
Talk:2006 Cincinnati Reds season

message: I don't know where to find a picture of the uniforms the Reds used in 2006.  Could somebody help me out with this? jj137Talk 16:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Large format lens

message: The list of external links needs pruning. RJFJR 16:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Algebraic Logic Functional programming language

message: I moved this article, I feel since ALF already seems to be obscure, (that was the basis of AfD as far as I can tell) a more appropriate title was in order. Perhaps the community of people who use ALF only refer to it as ALF, and in that case, I guess this move was a mistake. Bassgoonist 13:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Hypernova (band)

message: 2008-2009 U.S.A. tour section is completely irrelevant and not noteworthy, maybe it should be removed or edited Mohammadi7575 (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008-2009 tour

message: the article needs more citations for improtant facts or we should edit them to make it nuetral. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Atabek

message: * Comment: Hajji Piruz, I understand the frustration with the recent blockage of sockpuppets and sockpupeteers  who participated in your revert warring efforts ,. But this is not tit-for-tat issue, it's a matter of following Wikipedia policies, so before filing this kind of requests, I suggest you check here , instead of continuing to take community's time for something already done. Assume good faith.Atabek 06:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks for confirming my position above that this filing of yours is simply in "retaliation" and not based on firm suspicions. I don't mind running another checkuser on myself :), but as I said above, filing this report by yourself to include my name is simply a waste of community's time. You do need to assume good faith and research a little on the history of editors. User:Batabat was previously accused yet recovered his reputation during the ArbCom. As his page hints he resides in Hungary (quite a remote location of the planet from where I am). And your continuous attempts to harass me with accusations of sockpuppetry are futile. Unlike yourself with User:Behmod/User:Pam55 yesterday, I don't make use of socks, as those would only unduely damage my scholarly contributions in articles. This issue has been extensively discussed in previous ArbCom and cleared there. Thanks. Atabek 16:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? Retaliation for what? The sock came and reverted several articles to your version, that is very good evidence.Hajji Piruz 18:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:DSL technologies

message: Annex J and Annex L are only available in ITU G.992.3. --89.172.5.87 16:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

message: For many other protocols and standards, the navbox template is used, e.g.
* Template:Ethernet
* Template:IEEE standards
* Template:MPEG
* Template:Cellular network standards
* Template:Video storage formats
* Template:Compression formats
I believe that changing this custom table to a navbox would increase readability by allowing the various standards to be grouped. In addition, by using a well known template, the code would be easier to maintain and edit, and consistency between navboxes would be increased. Please comment. Conquerist (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Related discussion: Talk:Digital_subscriber_line#New_Template_of_DSL_Topics. Conquerist (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from sidebar to navbox?
Talk:Latina, Lazio

message: At the moment the table creates a huge gap of white space. I presume someone - whenever - will be filling in additional text in the article. So, I'm leaving it for the nonce but if no expansion were going to occur the page would have to be redesigned.Dave (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Climate figures
Talk:List of D.Gray-man minor characters

message: She/he is too awesome to not have at least a section in the minor characters page. Someone add this please? 24.196.3.70 02:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chomesuke? 

message: Do anyone knows the chief, the detective and Charles's Seiyū?--Frontier95 (talk) 03:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find a name for the chief, but Charles is voiced by Masafumi Kimur and if you mean Detective Moore, Satsuki Yukino. (Courtesy of AnimeNewsNetwork)  Itzjustdrama (drama?) 12:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Episode 

message: I think it will be better to have a list of minor characters for each episodes. Although the page may be long but it will be the best...--Frontier95 (talk) 07:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearranging of the page 

message: I have rearrange every single thing on the page. Please adapt to this change. Do not delete it, please. I spent a long time doing it.--Frontier95 (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. They had been added.--Frontier95 (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rearranging 

message: I know people has been editing to add Road's mother. But we will only add them after they appeared in the Anime. And also Tapp, the surname is not important. --Frontier95 (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At the header of this article it states, "This is a list of minor characters in the anime and manga series D. Gray-man, by Katsura Hoshino." We don't need to wait for characters to appear in the anime to add them to this list as this is a list of the anime AND manga characters. Kuro ♪ 04:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confliction

message: === Chakar Rabon and Kazanna Reed ===
Suman Dark's teammates, they never appeared in the manga but they made a brief appearance in the anime. Chakar's Innocence is a crossbow and Kazanna's a size-shifting sword, though like Lavi the size and weight of it does not bother him. In the manga, their bodies were simply sent to the Black Order. In the anime, Tyki appeared and they tried to fight him, but were unsuccessful. Their deaths frightened Suman, who did not want to die. 
=== Sol Galen, Tina Spark, and Gwen Frere ===
The three Exorcists under Cloud Nyne's team never appeared but their bodies were delivered to the Black Order after their search for the Generals failed. Because they were already sealed in coffins, their appearance and age can only be speculated by fans. Cloud Nyne weeps for them, but says that they may be relieved of their burden in death. This may be interpreted to mean that they were not as willing as some of the more passionate Exorcists to fight in the war. 
A few other minor characters. But they're in groups this time. Itzjustdrama? 23:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Characters
Talk:Cherrywood, Dublin

message: Validation: I was talking with one of the County people the other day, and he confirmed that Cherrywood, as part of a Greater Rathmichael-Cherrywood Area, is a formal new District Centre, and legally will be a new Town Centre once the Luas is in. So the business park (strictly, I was told, a Science and Technology Park) is here, unlike perhaps other areas, just the beginning of what I was assured was a rare thing, the deliberate formation of a new suburb (only other example the guy could think of was Adamstown). SeoR 16:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. But of course "deliberate" isn't a necessary pre-condition for a suburb! Most just evolve out of urban sprawl. (Sarah777 20:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  But if emerging, I still think there either needs to be general recognition by media and communities - which takes time, or, and preferably, by official bodies.  Even after all the strong growth, most of Dublin's suburbs have long histories - but some new ones, such as Clonee/Ongar, have emerged, albeit if those two are considered separate, the first is centred on a small old village.  Anyway, adding a reference to back up my note above.  SeoR 01:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Must say, Ongar is a surprise package. I'd never even heard of it! I'd guess that if not for the county line it might just be part of Clonee. (Sarah777 07:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  And I am not sure if it should not be listed as part of Clonee, which spreads across parts of Meath and Dublin anyway. Ongar as such is a developer invention, and some of the "component parts" of Clonee are bigger. Ah well, SeoR 22:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status

message: Interested parties pl note: this article was moved to "Cherrywood, Ireland" so as to disambiguate from a Cherrywood redlink somewhere in America. (God knows why). I moved it to "Cherrywood, Dublin" as per standard convention for Dublin urban areas. Sarah777 (talk) 02:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: It's now 2023 and there's been much development in just the last few years. I think this article could do with an overhaul and maybe some new pictures? 86.41.89.230 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Kingdom hearts (place)

message: The result was merge into Universe of Kingdom Hearts. -- Guyinblack25 19:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support.HadesDragon 19:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Support. Tiggerjay 22:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Easily merged. There's not enough material to even warrant an article. ' 02:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Content has been merged. (Guyinblack25 19:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Universe of Kingdom Hearts

message: I figure we should also remove the banners as well? I'm not really sure about the policy regarding that. Does anybody know if there's any policy for that or if we should just leave it alone? Guyinblack25 19:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed them, anyway. People aren't going to care about a redirect. ' 22:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banners
Talk:Changping, Beijing

message: Are the Western Hills part of Changping District? Badagnani 16:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Western Hills]]

message: is also a former name of this place, used in the old Britannicas and presumably intending 昌平州. Needs dates and sources, though, along with when it became a county, etc. — LlywelynII 08:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Chang-ping Chow
Talk:Fangshan, Beijing

message: Do the Western Hills include the Fangshan District? Badagnani 16:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Western Hills]]
Talk:Abbeville Opera House

message: The history section added by Operahouse gives the appearance of being a copy-and-paste from another source, possibly violating copyright. Some of it is good info, but definitely needs to be referenced. And, of course, if it violates a copyright, then it's gotta go. For the moment, I've given Operahouse the benefit of a doubt and left most of the addition, but the ambiguity around copyright needs to be cleared up soon, or the materials should be removed altogether.  Ipoellet 18:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New history section - copyright? 
Talk:Triple Crown of endurance racing

message: Hi. I removed redirect to create a standalone page because it does contain the table. Wispyrainon (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What does it mean "not enough"? When is it enough sourced? 2,3 many? We try to do our best. Wispyrainon (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main article 

message: Before 1966 and in 1972 there was no 24 hour race in Daytona. Wispyrainon (talk) 10:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table
Talk:Denmark Vesey House

message: I oppose deleting this article.  It describes a National Historic Landmark which makes it notable.  This article was marked for deletion because it did not have references and was not developed.  I added several references just now, but, please, other researchers, further develop this article, now!  Actually there is further material in the references to report.  And what is available from other external sources, that could be mentioned?  But anyhow, the article now has references and it is notable, so it should not be deleted. doncram 00:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't deleted. doncram (talk) 21:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Targeted for Deletion, Develop it!
Talk:100% English

message: As of today, none of the three references that used to be there, worked. Daily Telegraph one will no longer be available. I replaced that with an article in the Times Online. Because I do not want to delete the quotes sourced by the Scottish Herald (re-organized website) and a personal blog (I do not really think that one is 100% kosher, but why wasn't a permanent link used?) I kept those, but someone needs to find out where they are now.--Paul Pieniezny (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Is it worth noting there was a deceptive element to the show? In that it was a trick question- are you 100% English- due to there being no test which can confirm the ethnicity of all of one's ancestors none of them could have proven they were "100% English" anyway.
Dudley25 (talk) 03:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deceptive element 
Talk:Atalaya Castle (US)

message: If it is true that, shouldn't that be the name of the article? -- Pemilligan (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:The Hunters in the Snow

message: The picture is clipped, see Eduard Michel: Bruegel, Paris 1931, pl. 21. The tree to the left is cut of in this version - why? Perolofdk (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Under US law they have no say. I'll add a note. Johnbod (talk) 14:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cropped

message: Climate Change section seems out of place here.  It contains nothing specific to this painting, and quite a lot about other paintings and artists.  Also, it seems to take William James Burroughs as its primary source, without actually citing any of his work, while dismissing his opinion as "quite wrong".  Should this be rewritten and perhaps moved to either the main "Climate Change" entry or its own entry as "Evidence of climate change in art"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdm5599 (talk • contribs) 10:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've taken this out. Crucially it had nothing to say about the painting itself. It came across as something that might be copied-and-pasted to any number of similar paintings, it duplicates work in little ice age, and it simply wasn't very well written. There is a place for a paragraph about Hunters in the Snow and climate change, but it would have to be the work of a better writer. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate Change section 

message: Hope this doesn't shatter too many interested parties, but the players in the foreground are not playing ice hockey, that is bandy which uses a ball, possibly the most important forerunner of ice hockey's development, though bandy in its informal shape and style was commonly called "hockey on the ice". The two sports developed separately, but bandy was not played as an organized sport until the late 1800's in England, UK, and ice hockey has been pinpointed as having had its start as an organized sport during that same time, but according to the International Ice Hockey Federation this is now accepted as having taken place in Montreal, Quebec in Canada. Both sports share a similar origin and their early forerunner was similar but variable across the world where these types of stick and ball games were played on natural ice surfaces. There is only two concern of mine: it's not clear to me whether the bandy players are wearing ice skates, and the two players closest to the observer appear to be playing with a shorter stick which appears to more closely resemble a Veniki broom which is now still used in Moscow broomball, and I can't tell if they are using ice skates either. CheckersBoard (talk) 22:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  That is bandy, not ice hockey
Talk:Barking Abbey School

message: It is very common to refer to a school without using the word school in the vernacular - it is not worth mentioning in Wikipedia in particular cases as it is trivial information.
There is some evidence of confusion between Barking Abbey (a ruined Abbey) and Barking Abbey School - on Facebook for example. This can be cleared up by always using the word school where the context is not certain.92.232.34.78 (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling Barking Abbey School "Barking Abbey" 
Talk:Nothing's Changed (poem)

message: Very deep poem; use of vivid descriptions brings it alive in the minds of the readers; definitely a must read!!
It is a poem, therefore i would not call it a "must read".
It has lots of hidden meanings - Very easy but intriging poem to do for a GCSE peice of coursework.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeanneHobson (talk • contribs) 22:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous Discussion

message: I feel like a bit pedantic writing this, but the page is written a bit like a revision guide to analyse the poem, rather than an encyclopedia article.
I've removed the following line, as I don't think it adds anything on its own:
Tatamkhulu Afrika's life story is complicated, but knowing something about it will help you to understand the feelings expressed in this poem.
 
It would be useful to point out specific things about Afrika's life that are definitely shown in the poem, but we have to bear in mind Wikipedia's policy of 'no original research'. Briefly, this says that interpretations must be attributed to reliable sources; this article doesn't have any recorded references.
It would probably be useful to add the  template, unless there's a reason to apply the wikipedia policy of ignoring all rules, in favour of common sense.
I think we may have to remove the text that can't be backed up by definite sources. Although it it very useful iit than Wikipedia - you could set up a free atspace.com site for revision.
Am I along the right lines?
Drum guy (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the template today. Drum guy (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some changes needed? 

message: The whole poem is available at BBC Bitesize, so I assume it is in public domain. Putting it here would flesh out the article and give better insight than just showing bits of it. What do YOU think? Reguiieee (talk) 08:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote the entire poem?
Talk:T-1 (Terminator character)

message: CABAL, check the Skynet database inside your DVD extras again. While there is mention of VTOL and ATA/S missiles under "T-1 Aerial and Ground Assault Vehicles" the FK is never displayed. Selecting the window displaying the T-1s will lead to explanation of the model from the creators and the aerial model is never shown or talked about. If you check "Hunter-Killer Units" the FK is explicitly shown and if you select the window displaying them you will be lead to an explanation of the model from the creators where they are never referenced as T-1s but Hunter-Killer "prototypes" and "early HKs" The terms FK and Flyer Killer both come from the T3 Rise of the Machines, War of the Machines, and Redemption games.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.252.246.227 (talk) 02:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the changelog, if I recall correctly I had originally reflected that. It got garbled up in subsequent edits and now is gone from the main article entirely, for the better. CABAL (talk) 13:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Airborne model

message: "the only differences from its movie counterpart being that it is not artificially intelligent or armed with weapons"....oh, is that all...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.182.165 (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Best Quote of the Day
Talk:Fort Hill (Clemson, South Carolina)

message: I have noticed that this article, and the articles on Thomas Green Clemson, and Floride Calhoun contain possibly conflicting statements regarding the ownership of "Fort Hill" following John C. Calhoun's death in 1850. Any assistance in clearing up these discrepancies would be most appreciated. --TommyBoy (talk) 08:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited the page by providing some information on how Fort Hill passed from John C. Calhoun to Thomas Green Clemson. This version is from E. M. Lander's 1983 history of the Calhoun Family and Clemson. Alternative versions of this transfer exist. Many simplify the history by implying that it went from Calhoun to Clemson. See the South Carolina Encyclopedia for an example. KudzuVine (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added link to the NRHP inventory/nomination text for the site, which would probably also be pretty definitive about ownership up to the date of that text. doncram (talk) 03:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-1850 Ownership