Talk:Amos Lee

message: Deleted as unsourced.  If anyone has a free alternative, please upload -- Samir   धर्म 07:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use image

message: I removed it because of WP:EL it says there should not be links to myspace un less it is in reguard to the site its self. ie linking to someones myspace page should be avoided. I also removed it because MySpace can be extreamly harmful to computers (the recent computer virus and other things ) and it is un encyclopedic. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 11:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It says they generally should not be linked to.  You put in your edit summary that you were removing it as it was "unverifiable;" I disputed that, as it is listed on his official website.  I would definitely delete it if it were a fan-made MySpace, which I believe is largely the reason for the rule of thumb regarding them, but it is not. -Shannernanner 12:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: may I also point out that if a user wants they can go to the offical page and get to it. Another key issue with MySpace is that the whole system has security issues and can harm users. Just recently the site made United States news headlines for the fact that they were infected with a virus and the site has been known to have other issues. Im not anti-MySpace but the link doesnt need to be there i can see more harm than good coming from it. Also the term generaly was refering to most group pages as "unless mandated by the article itself" per Wikipedia:External links policy and the link is not mandated. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the phrase is "should generally not be linked to unless mandated by the article itself," which means that in general it is fine to link them if "mandated by the article itself," but generally should not be otherwise (meaning that there are exceptions), as I said.  I'm not really sure what the fact that the site has had viruses before has to do with anything, unless you wish to recommend to Wikipedia that they delete every MySpace link for risk of infecting users' computers, as many articles use MySpace links legitimately.  I'm not deadset against removing the link, but so far I have not seen any reason to do so. -Shannernanner 07:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MySpace link 

message: :Image:Amos Lee album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Amos Lee album.jpg

message: :Image:Supply and Demand.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Supply and Demand.jpg

message: I have temporarily semi-protected this article due to contentious editing that has run afoul of our biographies of living people policy.  Skomorokh, barbarian  23:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit was reversed because the content added was controversial and not supported by adequately reliable sources, which the above links by and large are not. Wikipedia has a presumption in favour of privacy for living subjects, which editors are asked to respect. Sincerely,  Skomorokh, barbarian  23:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected 

message: I have removed the photo below as it does not clearly ID the subject and adds not value to the article. If the info in the caption is sourced it can be added to the article as text.
*File:AmosLeeObamaRallyPhiladelphia.jpg|thumb|right|Amos Lee performing as part of an October 2008 Change Rocks voter registration rally for Barack Obama, on Philadelphia's Benjamin Franklin Parkway.-- — Keithbob • Talk •  13:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with your other changes to the article (chrono order, remove choppy sectioning based on albums) but disagree with this removal of the image.  The picture shows a video screen clearly identifying the subject as "Amos Lee, Singer Songwriter" and you can recognize him as well.  The image is illustrative to the article since it shows his political sympathies and shows him performing before what it probably his largest audience ever.  It also shows a Philadelphia landmark behind him, which illustrates the association with his hometown.  It's great that the article also has a close-up image for the infobox, but this is a complementary image that adds value to the article.  I've added a cite that he was there at the event.  I'm really not sure what your objection is based around here.  The usual problem with Wikipedia articles is that there are no images freely available at all!    Wasted Time R (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi WT, thanks for your comment and feedback. My objection is that the subject of the article is Amos Lee, not the crowd/city and this is a picture of the heads of a crowd and buildings with a screen image in the far background that is unidentifiable. Someone has said its Amos Lee but the background image is so small that we cannot recognize the person. Do think there is any truth to what I am saying?-- — Keithbob • Talk •  19:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject of the article is the career of Amos Lee, and this photo of this performance illustrates part of that career.  Are you seriously concerned that this is a case of misidentification?  Look at these Google Images of Lee ... the hair is the same, the facial hair is the same, he wears those kind of glasses sometimes, he uses the same black acoustic guitar sometimes ... it's clearly the same guy, and the graphic on the video screen confirms that.  It's common to include "setting" photos as well us close-up photos in articles like this.  Look at U2, for instance, which is a Featured Article.  Several images show the group up close, but several others show the group at a far distance as part of illustrating their stage productions or special appearances.  Wasted Time R (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi WT, you are a good editor and I respect your position even though I disagree. At this time I think it would be best to get some outside input from uninvolved editors at the BLP noticeboard and see if they have some insights that might help to resolve this for us. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk •  19:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Since there was no support at BLPN to keep the photo I think there a clear consensus to remove it and so I have taken it down. We can look for some better pictures to add at a later time. Thank you for participating in the discussion and hope we can work together to improve the article further. All the best, -- — Keithbob • Talk •  22:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove Photo

message: I have been slowly re-writing and expanding the article. Assistance and comments are welcome.-- — Keithbob • Talk •  21:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed the re-write and have nominated the article for GA status.  cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk •  21:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite and expansion of article

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Amos Lee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://charlotte.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/who_is_amos_lee_/Content?oid=338842
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111211174850/http://www.parenthoodtvsoundtrack.com/ to http://www.parenthoodtvsoundtrack.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified