Talk:Rita MacNeil

message: :Image:RitaMacNeilAlbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:RitaMacNeilAlbum.jpg

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: This article seems excessively long, considering the vast majority of it is from MacNeil's autobiography. Is it really necessary to know so much detail, cribbed from page after page of this one source, when a reader can simply buy the book itself? The article should be trimmed to reflect that she was - sorry to say - an obscure singer. Princetoniac (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Long? 

message: After some quick research, it looks like the original insults about Ms Macneil and the forklift were launched by Philadelphia sports writer Bill Conlin  (https://img.newspapers.com/img/thumbnail/186964176/400/400/0_0_3485_4029.jpg?cs=604800 Article) who died in 2014 and was revealed in 2011 to have been a child molester. It feels like relevant information, yet undeniably tangential to this article. Does this fact merit inclusion? 
IMO the issue of Ms Macneil's weight needs more coverage in this article -- the uncomfortable reality is that most Canadians only remember her as an overweight public figure first, and a singer second. I could not tell you a single song of hers, but I definitely remember her name and the merciless criticism of her in Canadian media -- I think Air Farce had a skit where she inflated until she exploded. It's strange in 2022 that a family-friendly comedy show could produce skits where the punchline is "this real person is fat," but nevertheless it happened all the time. Anyways, something to consider.
— Muckapedia (talk) 10e juil. 2022 11h30 (−4h)
:Her response makes the inclusion worthwhile. Her weight, or more appropriately her size, is a significant part of her life (see the clothing size advocacy.) I would leave is as relevant.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: World Series Insult