Talk:Industrial espionage

message: Restored previous discussion - inadvertently deleted - from history for 11th December 2010 - PaddingtonBaer 19:18 GMT 10.12.14
: I removed it again. The previous discussion was not removed, merely archived. This was done because nearly all of it was several years old and no longer relevant. Yoenit (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored discussion from history

message: Please provide a convincing argument based on the subject content as to why this page should stay named 'industiral espionage' rather than 'economic and industrial espionage' - as proposed - or I will rename the page in a few weeks.
Note to future editors If no argument based on knowledge of the content of the article is provided then please do not try to delete renamed page - thanks!
: The page was deleted because you did a cut/paste move, not because anybody disagreed with the new title. We have a special tool called Move and you should use that if you want to change the name of a page. You should have wp:autoconfirmed status by now, and be able to move the page with Move (little downward pointing arrow next to the searchbox). Feel free to test it out, as I don't think anybody will object to this move. Yoenit (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to new title

message: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/05/us-dupont-china-verdict-idUSBREA241WC20140305 XOttawahitech (talk) 05:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can this be added to this article? 

message: Much of modern Chinese industrial advances can be traced back to two incidences. One the much planned governmental action that led to the Tiananmen square shooting. Any person with some intelligence and information on how individuals and institutions use very powerful cunning to subdue the wariness of prospective preys will know that this shooting was a very planned action. And very much part of a grand espionage endeavour.   
The US swallowed the false incident as true and many of the participants, willing or unwilling, reached the very vitals of US industrial and scientific might. 
The second item was not espionage and cannot be discussed here. It was the grandiose idiot-ism of England in giving Hong Kong to China. Literally giving them a platform to stand on a level of equality, which is not there in most Asian language systems.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.241.8 (talk) 07:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiananmen square shooting and the art of Oriental espionage  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Industrial espionage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110203052113/http://www.uscc.gov/researchpapers/2009/NorthropGrumman_PRC_Cyber_Paper_FINAL_Approved%20Report_16Oct2009.pdf to http://www.uscc.gov/researchpapers/2009/NorthropGrumman_PRC_Cyber_Paper_FINAL_Approved%20Report_16Oct2009.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified