lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carolingian minuscule

message: On modern, high-resolution monitors the initial example images used in Carolingian minuscule (:File:CarolingianMinuscule.jpg), Merovingian script (:File:Merov.jpg), and several related articles are far too small (low-resolution) to be useful.  Even with 2.25x reading glasses on, these images are nearly useless on resolutions above 1920x1200 (at 2560x1440 they're an unfunny joke). — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 15:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Example images far too small

message: There's a pretty gigantic omission in this page -- the very reason and origins of Carolingian minuscule. The lead says;
"Carolingian minuscule or Caroline minuscule is a script which developed as a calligraphic standard in Europe so that the Latin alphabet could be easily recognized by the literate class from one region to another."
Well ... no. Carolingian minuscule wasn't developed to make the Latin alphabet more readable, it was developed to make Jerome's Latin Vulgate Bible more readable. Marcia Colish writes;
"This stress on the correction, recopying, and distribution of basic texts, both religious and secular, is a recurrent theme in the Carolingian Renaissance and one of its most central services to European intellectual history. In many cases, the Carolingian rescensions are the earliest copies to survive and provide the bases for modern critical editions of works fundamental to the classical and Christian traditions. Charlemagne looked first to Anglo-Saxon England for a scholar to head his court school, finding him in Alcuin (c. 730-804). He assigned to Alcuin the correction of the Vulgate. In conjunction with this project, and later in his career when he became abbot of Tours, Alcuin invented a new style of handwriting, the Caroline minuscule (Plate 6)." (Source: Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition: 400-1400. Yale University Press, 1997, 67)
So this should be fixed pretty ASAP. It should be clear in the lead and a section should be devoted to it in the page (if not occupying a good amount of the 'Creation' section). The lead is also wrong when it claims it was the monks of Abbey Corbie who developed the script -- it was just Alcuin.70.49.181.61 (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge omission -- Jerome's Vulgate Bible
Talk:Standalone DSL

message: The Naked DSL (which is all I've ever heard it refered to as) page has at least something up.
Should this not redirect there?
:As this article is empty (so no point in merging), I've been bold and redirected it.
:Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 19:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Naked DSL]]?
Talk:Georgios Balanos

message: I added the hoax warning.  To explain... there are 0 results for this guys name on Google and I can verify none of the claims in the article.  If no one can explain this within a few days I will nominate for deletion.  --W.marsh 01:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello W.marsh
I prepare an article on the work of balanos, in particular on his crawling shadow idea. I worked first on his bio that can be found at www.locus7.gr under the panel button Γιώργος Μπαλάνος.  Google will probably write details under his Greek name in Greek. Though his work is almost unknown to the Western (Anglo-american ? ) world, he is probably of the magnitude of Erich von Daeniken due to his enormous research that I have not included yet. The article about the crawling shadow is currently under preparation.
Sincerelly
Corvin von Amber —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CORVINVONAMBER (talk • contribs) .
:Thanks for that note.  I was thinking that could be the case... a guy largely unknown to the anglo world.  I have removed the hoax notice.  You might consider making links to Balanos Georgios from another article, so he is connected to other pages on the english Wikipedia, and also linking to his article in the greek Wikipedia, if there is one.  Let me know if you need help with that.  --W.marsh 18:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (I copied this from user talk:W.marsh to explain why the hoax tag had been removed. RJFJR 05:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Balanos from Corvin von Amber
Talk:Over-the-air update

message: I see OTA used more often to refer to over the air download of content, be it a J2ME or BREW app, ringtones, wallpapers, or whatnot.  Mathiastck 15:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OTA downloading of content 

message: One sentence says:
"...central location can send an Update to all the Users; who are unable to refuse, defeat, or alter that Update..."
Next sentence says:
"...A User could "refuse" OTA but the "Channel Manager" could also kick them off the Channel..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.56.153.73 (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the word "often", but that still doesn't completely absolve it of a contradiction. JGHFunRun (talk) 03:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self contradiction? 

message: I need some guidance from a Real life person who can get me started in syncing with all my Devices laptop notebook and PC.  Presently working in the Microsoft 8.1.
Please call me to help me. 
Thank you for your assistance. 
I am available now 4053003274
 JoRick (talk) 20:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call me to work Android device over the internet  

message: Was it the first OTA programming? Noted for achieving it over one billion miles. If so it may be worth adding to the article. 89.240.193.13 (talk) 02:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voyager spacecraft  

message: The first few paragraphs of this behave like corporate copy describing over the air programming. this is silly. 2600:1700:66D0:2540:74AE:DC69:5D99:DA76 (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this like an advertisement 

message: The old title was unclear. I initially thought it referred to television programmes.
Boldly moved Over-the-air programming to Over-the-air update. Clear common term. DFlhb (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I may have overstated that. I initially thought the term "over-the-air programming" was dubious, since most results I found were were from IGI Global (an unreliable pay-to-publish outfit) or unreliable sites, but it seems the term does exist in scholarship, and is present in Google Ngram, though not as common as "OTA update". Still think it's more recognizable. DFlhb (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from [[Over-the-air programming]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Xed 2

message: What's with making retrospective changes to arbitration decisions?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FXed_2&diff=49538235&oldid=45225680 -- Danny Yee 11:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Xed or see the bottom of this . Jayjg (talk) 02:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  retrospective changes to decisions?
Talk:Rubycon Corporation

message: I fixed up the weird bold-face formatting (making some letters in a word bold), not sure how that happened.  Thanks for cleaning up some of the marketing-speak.  Just from looking at the Rubycon site, there is more information you could include if you wanted to; number of employees, capital, corporate history, etc.  The rule of thumb is that information should be written objectively, and be third-party verifiable.  Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, Jasmol 02:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: To the author (a Rubycon employee, I'm guessing):

message: I believe that Seibu Shin-ei was only the name of a sub-company, not the main company. Bloomberg indeed says it is the former company name, but I think they might be mistaken. Reference: http://www.rubycon.co.jp/profile/history.html Syced (talk) 04:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seibu Shin-ei
Talk:Tranent

message: What a rough town Tranent is. Thank goodness I never have to get off the bus there.82.41.29.1
:I guess you must come from somewhere "less rough" then, like Haddington or Dunbar. I think you will find if you get of the bus it's not as "rough" as you think. Of course the town has a long history of being a working class area - but that doesn't mean it's rough. You might be missing out on so many nice things like visiting the local pubs, which are full of very colourful characters - I can personally recommend "The Tower". You could also shop there at the local Co-op Superstore. Some of the surrounding countryside is breathtaking including the walk up to nearby Faside Castle where you can get a fabulous view of the Firth of Forth from Edinburgh, over to Fife and encompassing views over East Lothian to the Lammermuir Hills, North Berwick and Traprain Law. See what you're missing --Billps 16:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose I am also being biased here, but... "the pubs, which are full of colourful characters"...eh yes.  The same person, no doubt, who bit off that poor guy's nose and ear! Tpacw (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

message: What is the connection of Ian Black (footballer born 1985) with Tranent?  His article says he was born in Bathgate, and doesn't mention Tranent. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ian Black?
Talk:Peshawar Nights

message: Giving a summary of part of the content of the book as if it were the whole, and phrasing it as if Shi'a arguments were true, is both POV and a misrepresentation. I think the book is adequately paraphrased in the first section, and if any readers have further questions the whole text is online. Zora 04:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of book 

message: This article is right of this being a Persian Forgery. One big Mistake the Shias did was claiming that Peshawar ( a PASHTO SPEAKING city) Was speaking Persian loooooool in Peshawar Pashtuns speak STRICTLY PASHTO they dont even use Urdu there, so how they speak Farsi??? When i heard this book was published by an iranian guy. I mean it just cant get clearer than this, All the evidence of a Fictional Forgery story right in your face. LMAO i wanted to know what the hell that guy was thinking when he wrote this story. This is how low shias will go to actually TRY to prove they won there first argument for once in the history against a Sunni debate!!! Unbelievable looooool Pashtun786 (talk) 09:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  COMPLETE SHIA PERSIAN FORGERY 

message: I have worked out this section (and it sub-sections 'English Editions', 'Translations in other languages', 'Citations and mentions', etc.) and have been adding to them (& may be will continue to do so).
The reason behind this is, that the "article was nominated for deletion" (the result was keep), giving the reason, "No independent, thorough coverage found in WP:BEFORE." These sections try to establish that the book is notable enough, that it has not only been reprinted several times in English by different publishers across the world but also has been translated to several languages and has not only been cited by books but is also used as teaching/reference material in academia  and suggested as reading material by others.
Anyone having any qualms about these (sub)-section(s) (or any forked ones from them in future) and the material there-in is free to discuss it here before any major edit on article just to avoid any edit-war or bruised egos due to undo/reverts. Thanks--Fztcs 07:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 'Book's coverage' and it's sub-sections
Talk:Debian GNU/kFreeBSD

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the tag as I have de-redirected this article. Plugwash (talk) 15:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing 

message: This article (probably) needs to be updated to reflect policies in place with the release of Debian 7.0 Wheezy.
Strugee (talk) 04:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debian Wheezy 

message: The Criticism section (which seems to be the major reason this page exists, as it has little other content), definitely seems to violate NPOV.  It is written from the point of view of those making these criticisms, "The support of the non-Linux kernels prevent packages to be adapted to infrastructural changes and delay the integration of such improvements to Debian GNU/Linux."  "A notorious example is systemd," "Systemd is modular and can very well be ported to kernels other than Linux, but parts of systemd do build upon structures present in the Linux kernel only, not only for performance reasons, but also because it is an apt way to get things done."  This is not only not NPOV ("apt way to get things done"), but incorrect as systemd is not only not being ported to other kernels, but was made specifically to be Linux only. 
"Weston was published under the terms of the MIT License, but because of performance reasons, Weston is (so far) Linux-only. "  It is amusing that things are only ever Linux only for performance reasons.  "implementing the successor to X, "  this is up for debate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.127.54 (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reduced the criticism section to the verifiable part. Please don't remove referenced sentences and paragraphs in the future. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed the criticism section entirely. Debian as a project has no directive whatsoever to make systemd the default. Consequently, speculating about when it will be the default is misleading and dishonest. When tech-ctte makes a decision we'll be able to speak about systemd and factors impacting its adoption, but until then, it is absolutely inappropriate to include this in a factual article about Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. Dream of Goats (talk) 00:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms of "Criticism"
Talk:Great Observatories program

message: I removed references to follow-up/future "Great Observatories," as I don't believe they technically are. I'll poke around and find a better place to put them. 24.17.30.163 02:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Future observatories

message: Just passing by, but this article also mentions that Spitzer was not launched by Shuttle because of Challenger.  I believe this should be change to the Columbia accident, which occured in Febuary of 2003, the same year Spitzer was launched. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.136.242.206 (talk • contribs) 
:*No, since these observatories and their launches are planned years in advance, it was indeed the Challenger incident that affected Spitzer's choice of launch vehicle. --Etacar11 12:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: challenger?

message: This article was nominated for Wikipedia 0.5, but I failed it because of having no references, rather poor prose, short lead per WP:LEAD and other concerns. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 22:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 0.5 nom

message: "Parts which survived reentry splashed into the Pacific Ocean." Should read "Parts that survived ..."
See http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm discussion of restrictive clauses.
DaveCrane (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammatical error
Talk:Tuoba

message: What is with the "did not exist" section??? Does that mean that there was no 'era name'. Maybe that part should be removed from the table? Astrokey44 02:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Tuoba (Tabgach) language was in fact Mongolic, probably best termed Para-Mongolic (cf. Janhunen 2003). Although the language seems to have had some Turkic elements with certain official titles, what we know of the basic lexical items shows it was a language related to Mongolic. -Andrew
Whats the difference with TOUBA AND TABGACH???? Can anyone say answer? To-ba=Chinese Tabgaç=Turki like a Mo-tun(chinese)=METE in Turkic. And Their origin not only Mongol  TURKS(HUNS),MOGOL and TUNGUSİC people....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.230.105.234 (talk) 13:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  linguistic affinity 

message: There should be a section on modern day descendants. I will try Juicebaby (talk) 08:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It is hard to know for sure since the N. Wei dynasty ended more than a millenium ago. However my guess is anyone surnamed Yuan (元) today is likely to be a descendant of the clan, since imperial clans always multiply really fast. Zhieaanm (talk) 08:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descendants 

message: Why not list all the dynasties ruled by Tuoba? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: List all dynasties ruled by Tuoba

message: Moderators please be aware. Wikipedia SOCKPUPPET accounts WHO EDITS EVERYTHING WITH A PRO-TURKIC BIAS VIEW.  He is the same person who had been blocked/banned but comes back to edit Turkic origins on what he wants.
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.113.17.211
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.113.180.205
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/5.112.183.249
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/212.95.8.240
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/212.95.8.187
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/185.229.190.37
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/193.171.130.114  
it is the same person who is ALWAYS edits anything with Turkic origins and rejects any other theories that is non-Turkic. He pro-Turkic nationalist and biasly edit everything as having pro Turkic origin and tried to edit Northern wei as Turkic dynasty, Xianbei and it's people as Turkic but reject every other theories and doesn't allow anything that is different to it. He still does this despite his edits being removed many times he uses different ip address to keep editing Turkic origins for everything he wants.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.192.16 (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia editor sockpuppet using more many IP different accounts
Talk:U.S. Route 22

message: William Penn Highway was pre-1927 Route 5 and pre-1927 Route 12, not US 22, across New Jersey - see  --SPUI (T - C) 02:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: William Penn Highway

message: Why wouldn't NJ Route 28 be considered major at US Route 22 and US 202/206 are?
nextbarker
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker  (talk • contribs) 03:28, 18 August 2006  (UTC)
:NJ 28 is a state route that doesn't serve any special purpose and doesn't belong on the page of a U.S. Route. US 202 is a U.S. Route that runs from Maine to Delaware. -- NORTH talk 15:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Precisely, at least not on U.S. Route pages. -- NORTH talk 03:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm a tiny bit confused by that comment.  The I-78/US 22 junction should be (and is) listed on the junction list on the Route 31 page.  But as I said before, state routes should not be listed on this page (or any other U.S./Interstate page) except in very rare circumstances, or on much shorter routes. -- NORTH talk 07:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I still have no idea what you're trying to ask here.  Neither NJ 31 nor NJ 82 should be listed in this infobox under major junctions.  If you're asking about infoboxes on other articles, it may be clearer if you asked on those talk pages. -- NORTH talk 21:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major junctions

message: Why is New York not listed on the States traversed list??? Since I'm a resident of Mount Vernon, New York, there is a Route 22 in Mount Vernon, New York. It is called North Columbus/US-22 and South Columbus/US-22. -chris^_^ 09:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The road you are referring to is New York State Route 22, not US 22. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New York

message: Not to be nitpicky but I believe the eastbound eastern terminus of US 22 is at the ramp split between I-78 and US1-9 rather than NJ 21 and US1-9. The ramp split for northbound NJ 21 occurs about 0.3 miles west of the eastern end. The SLD also shows I-78 and US1-9 as the eastern end. See also . --Polaron | Talk 22:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  eastern terminus
Talk:U.S. Route 222

message: PA 222 redirects here, but there is no mention of the use of that designation.  If PA 222 was never used, I think the redirect should be deleted.--J Clear 23:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pennsylvania Route 222 continues beyond the north end at Interstate 78 and Pennsylvania Route 309 into Allentown." --SPUI (T - C) 02:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: DOH!  Double DOH! because it's bold.--J Clear 03:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PA 222 has now been moved to its own article. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PA 222  

message: It comes from WFMZ-TV's Berks County Time Train (a different video every week on the Berks News Edition.) It is out of date due to being from 2010. Widening and roundabout construction are in progress starting in 2020. Heff01 (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't quite sure what you were talking about, but then I saw your edits in the article.  I went ahead and converted your link to a full citation. –Fredddie™ 05:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube video
Talk:U.S. Route 322

message: US 322 occupies the historic roadbed of Horseshoe Pike, a road leading northwest from Downingtown through the borough of Honey Brook and on through Ephrata to Harrisburg, Pa. Horseshoe Pike had been in use since the early 1700s as the Paxtang Road and was upgraded to a turnpike c. 1800. Chronicler3 17:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 322 at Downingtown 

message: AGAIN!  WTF????  the map was here to show the proposed path of the freeway...  it is legitimate... why was it deleted?!?!?!?! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Route 82 (talk • contribs) 12:13, March 7, 2007  (UTC)
:Because you fail to understand Wikipedia copyright and fair use policy... and apparently civility and talk page guidelines now as well. -- NORTH talk 08:36, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image removal

message: 1911 PA state map: From the state line to Meadville, US 322 was signed as LR 206 and LR 82. From Meadville tp Franklin, the route was signed as LR 207. From Franklin to Brookeville, the route was LR 65, 64. East of Brookeville, it was signed as LR 60. In Mifflin County around Lewistown, it was signed as LR 29. The freeway duplexed with US 22 today, was signed as LR 32 and LR 31. From Harrisburg to West Chester, it was signed as LR 137. -- JA10 T · C 15:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1930 state map: US 322 ended in Water Street, PA at US 22. From Lewistown to Harrisburg, the highway was only designated as US 22, US 11, and US 15. From Harrisburg to Hummelstown it was signed as US 22. From Hummelstown to West Chester as PA 5. -- JA10 T · C 22:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former alignments 

message: ---Dough4872 02:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PA major intersections