lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Myocheong

message: Wikified as part of the wikification drive.
KarenAnn 14:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified
Talk:Templar, Arizona

message: Lol, I'm quoted a source in a wikipedia article.--Stilanas 19:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't get me wrong, I love Templar, but it's a smaller comic than Stuff Sucks,which doesn't have its own page. Should Templar really get one? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.176.165.43 (talk) 04:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A future update will cover some of Templar's recent notoriety, including further awards, its appearance in Scott McCloud's Making Comics, a character cameo in World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade, the overwhelming success of the pre-order project and said project's coverage in some major comics blogs, etc etc. If you feel that Stuff Sucks deserves a page more than Templar does, then create one. Brokenlibrarian 14:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this deserve to be an article? 

message: There's a section in this article about Trotman herself, which includes info about some of her other work.  This content seems more appropriate for a separate article, particular one with information about her more recent work (e.g. Smut Peddler, Sleep of Reason) which establishes her notability indepdent of T,AZ. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  spin off [[C. Spike Trotman]]?
Talk:Vedat İnceefe

message: ==Notability==
Removing my tag does nothing to assist in establishing notability does it? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed tag to context which might be a better one Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Removing my tag does nothing to assist in establishing notability does it? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed tag to context which might be a better one Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Category talk:Judiciaries by country

message: I'm no lawyer, but the categories :Category:Judiciaries and :Category:Court systems by country look like a duplicated mess to me. Someone easily confused (?) might have expected to find a more logical structure, like: branches of national government; court systems; and judges. I've made a few tweaks at the moment, and I'm wondering about proposing the merger of court systems into judiciaries to help sort out the differences between the two. Any views??--Mereda 14:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the Judiciary of Australia and Australian court system articles are already explaining. — Instantnood 22:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Dang, it's been seven years and nobody has done anything about it yet. Wbm1058 (talk) 14:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judiciary: government, court systems & judges
Talk:Prothonotary

message: The apostolic protonotary section had a long section copy-pasted from the old CE.
I put the text at Protonotary Apostolic and I summarized that here.
A wholesale revert back to a copy-pasted text seems a step backward.
Based on the rest of this article (the short stubs for other sections), a long
history section seems a little out of place. Gimmetrow 14:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here in Philadelphia the story about Truman is attributed, apparently incorrectly, to Eisenhower, upon meeting the Prothonotary of a Philadelphia court. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I've capitalized the word in the Canadian section since Prothonotaries take the same degree of deference as Judges here.  I know that in Canada people are often surprised to know that it's pronounced proh-THON-oh-tory but I have no idea how to represent that in IPA.  Any assistance? Accounting4Taste:talk 21:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Currently the lead says:
:"The title was awarded to certain high-ranking notaries."
and links notaries to solicitor if that is what is meant then I suggest that solicitor is displayed and linked in brackets.
:"The title was awarded to certain high-ranking notaries (solicitors)."
If notaries is meant then link it to the article notary:
:"The title was awarded to certain high-ranking notaries."
I'm just passing and linking another article to this one, so I will not make the change but hope that someone else who knows more about it will make the change to make the lead clearer.-- PBS (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  High-ranking notaries 
Category talk:Judiciaries

message: I'm no lawyer, but the categories :Category:Judiciaries and :Category:Court systems by country look like a duplicated mess to me. Someone easily confused (?) might have expected to find a more logical structure, like: branches of national government; court systems; and judges. I've made a few tweaks at the moment, and I'm wondering about proposing the merger of court systems into judiciaries to help sort out the differences between the two. Any views??--Mereda 14:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Responded at category talk:Court systems by country. — Instantnood 22:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judiciary: government, court systems & judges
Talk:Nagaraja

message: Wikified as part of the wikification drive. However, not all of the article makes sense, especially the last sentence. Removed wikify tag abd added cleanup tag. KarenAnn 15:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :
That last is Tibetan, I guess?  Strange to give a transliteration from Tibetan without showing the Tibetan script, particularly when the article nowhere mentions Tibet otherwise.  I'm gonna take it out; as it is, it misleadingly suggests that klu'i rgyal po is an alternate transliteration of नागराज. —Tamfang (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tibet?
Talk:Global warming skeptic

message: I changed the redirect from Scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming to Global warming controversy.  The former isn't really appropriate since not all GW skeptics are scientists. The latter is appropriate since it addresses global warming skepticism in general. --Nethgirb 10:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have returned this redirect to Global warming controversy, as before. Inappropriate to equate skeptics to deniers, a a pejorative political term. --Pete Tillman (talk) 01:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's inappropriate to pretend that those promoting climate change denial are skeptics, a misleading political tactic discussed by high quality sources at that article. . . dave souza, talk 15:29, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Dave, your POV is showing, both here and at Climate change denial. Pete Tillman (talk) 19:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes Pete, I'm complying with giving due weight to mainstream pov; in contrast, your fringe POV pushing is getting disruptive. . . dave souza, talk 14:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Your first revert was "no explanation given", and your second revert is a vague pointer to NPOV. What, exactly, is the rationale for redirecting to an article which doesn't discuss this subject by name even once?   — Jess· Δ♥ 20:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, Tillman didn't say "no explanation given", and the controversy article says "skeptic*" about 40 times. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 13:35, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @ Peter Gulutzan, you're the editor who summarised your revert reason as No explanation given. The controversy article uses the word without explanation or definition, in various contradictory ways: for example, it says "the Senate's most vocal global warming skeptic, Jim Inhofe" but also has a good source saying this label for him is a misuse of "skeptic" to refer to deniers. On that basis, I'll restore the redirect to climate change denial, you're welcome to present sources supporting your position at Talk:Climate change skeptic as requested . dave souza, talk 14:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: ----
*The substantial discussion of the "Redirect skeptic to denier" question is (currently) at Talk:Climate change skeptic, and one other? It's confusing. --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, you and Peter G seem to trying to maximise confusion, no doubt inadvertently. Centralised discussion is preferable. . . dave souza, talk 14:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Bullshit, Dave. --Pete Tillman (talk) 17:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Centralise discussion..

message: I posted an RfC on this redirect at: Talk:Climate change denial#Redirects to this page. Please feel free to provide your input.   — Jess· Δ♥ 16:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on this redirect, and others
Template talk:Page log

message: I think displaying the title of the target article using just one parameter would make the template less unwieldy to use. The only way to display the title would be to put ; typing  just outputs  instead of . However, the main concern of implementing this proposed design is that the change could disrupt templates that display "page log" by default (e.g. Talk:MIME/Archive 1#broken link: MailCap).
AlphaBeta135talk 23:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplifying usage of Page Log template
Talk:Nana Fadnavis

message: It is claimed that "Ghashiram Kotwal"-play by Vijay Tendulkar- "is not supported by any historical facts or evidences." I am not sure about it. Vasudev Vamanshastri Khare's book "Nana Phadanvis Yanche Charitra", first published in 1892, gives the gruesome story of how Ghashiram Kotwal's act of confining Telange brahmins resulted into the deaths of a few of them and how the pressure was brought upon reluctant Nana by Peshwa himself to act. Khare's book is sympathetic towards Nana but even he admits there was something amiss in that episode.
Shouldn't this appear under Farnavis in category pages (changing the sort key), even though Farnavis was not a family name? Schissel | Sound the Note! 15:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australian Rugby League Hall of Fame

message: how about getting rid of all that ugly yellow highlighting? 199.4.23.18 12:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Ballot of 25 April 2018 they'll pick 6 from : 
Greg Alexander 1984-1999 / Royce Simmons 1980-1991 / Gorden Tallis 1992-2004 / Bob Lindner  / Steve Renouf / 
Petero Civoniceva 1998-2012 / Ricky Stuart 1998-2000 / Kevin Walters 1987-2001 / Cliff Lyons 1985-1999 / Steve Menzies 1993-2008 Mark Graham / Ruben Wiki / Stacey Jones 
 Six were picked in July 2018
* Gorden Tallis
* Ricky Stuart
* Mark Graham
* Petro Civoniceva
* Steve Menzies
* Cliff Lyons
-Sticks66 13:46, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 Nominees
Talk:Budhi Kunderan

message: This is a good article. Well done to all involved. Capitalistroadster 15:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Ham

message: Actually, no it isn't. The largest racial group- Asians- make up 7/10ths of the population. Whoever wrote this nonsense clearly thinks "diversity" just means a low number of whites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:12:2B24:9176:FEED:1708:232C (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "extremely ethnically diverse" 

message: I hadn't heard of Benoy Soman, and he doesn't have a Wikipedia entry, so I looked the name up in Google. I can't see anyone noteworthy of that name referenced, so I've removed him from the Natives list. If he is noteworthy, please explain who he is.
* Benoy Soman born in East Ham appears to be school swimmer, when famous enough to get his own article, maybe he should go back! Also added, David Bailey, Terence Dicks; renamed and restructured. Kbthompson 12:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natives 

message: The article could do with a heavy edit - dividing into sections, removal of advertising, more encyclopaedic style ... the block of text at the front is beginning to read like a stream of conciousness novel. Kbthompson 00:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: is not in East Ham, it is in E12. WillE (talk) 12:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kensington Avenue Temple... 

message: I am a 14 year old girl i go to a good school with a good reating. my primerey school is not good on the other  dotem of hand because of the por reating and in East Ham the school is at the botem of the list. thank you --178.110.79.50 (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  east hams schools 
Talk:Turibius of Mogrovejo

message: Why is this man a saint given the stats for Lima?  See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition#Henningsen-Contreras_statistics_for_the_period_1540.E2.80.931700  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.133.11.4 (talk) 15:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The first seminary?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 12:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  " In 1591 founded seminary in the western hemisphere "
Talk:Angusticlavia

message: Hi, several of us are trying to organize the various "history of clothing" categories into a coherent framework, and we'd like to replace :Category:Roman era clothing with :Category:History of clothing (ancient Rome).. Is that OK with you all?  Please add your comments and suggestions here and I'll check back here in a few days -- thanks muchly! :) WillowW 15:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recategorization OK?

message: Editors and contributors, I want to encourage you all to continue working with this article until it is assessed as Class-A. It needs, perhaps, a few "redirects," more links to it, a bit more editing, and relevancy, and definitively, a better etymology. If you want to contact me, please, do so at [| historian page]. I would love to help. Historian 15:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving the Article

message: Already posted in that respective page, but since it looks deserted, I'll also post it here: Maybe this can be merged under this? -- 201.6.223.137 (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Category talk:Roman-era clothing

message: Hi, several of us are trying to organize the various "history of clothing" categories into a coherent framework, and we'd like to replace :Category:Roman era clothing with :Category:History of clothing (ancient Rome).. Is that OK with you all?  Please add your comments and suggestions here and I'll check back here in a few days -- thanks muchly! :) WillowW 15:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not degrade :Category:Clothing by nationality with this undertaking. --The Editrix 18:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you leave those of us who are actually interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of historical clothing to actually get on with the task? Churchh 04:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recategorization OK?
Talk:Toga praetexta

message: Hi, several of us are trying to organize the various "history of clothing" categories into a coherent framework, and we'd like to replace :Category:Roman era clothing with :Category:History of clothing (ancient Rome).. Is that OK with you all?  Please add your comments and suggestions here and I'll check back here in a few days -- thanks muchly! :) WillowW 15:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recategorization OK?
Talk:Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee

message: Sabrina Yuan Hao, Robert van Gulik and His Chinese Sherlock Holmes (Brill, 2023).
Van Gulik's source novel for this translation or adaptation of his is now generally believed not to have been an eighteenth century Chinese novel but rather one written around 1890. An article on this point is already cited in the Wikipedia entry on "Judge Dee." It is:   Benedetti, Lavinia (2014). “Killing Di Gong: Rethinking van Gulik’s Translation of Late Qing Dynasty Novel Wu Zetian Si Da Qi’an”, in Paolo Santangelo (ed.), Ming Qing Studies 2014, 11-42. Jkinkley (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New scholarship on this topic
Talk:Donald Reilly

message: I have added his New York Times obituary as a reference. Capitalistroadster 15:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:All-Star Triangle Bowl

message: Does this article contribute any substantial information that is not conveyed in the Orangeburg Massacre article?  Badagnani 15:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All-Star Triangle Bowl is on the National Register of Historical Sites. This article is now linked on the list. The article also provides more information than Orangeburg Massacre article. - Deron Dantzler 14:26, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessity of this article
Talk:Ignaz Schuppanzigh

message: The information for this article comes primarily from Groves, from Cobbetts Cyclopedic Survey of Chamber Music, from Paul Griffith's History of the String Quartet (cited in the article).  I didn't know if it was appropriate to cite Cobbetts and Groves in the Resources.  I will let some more senior Wikipedian decide that.
Thanks,
--Ravpapa 15:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Ravpapa. You are as senior as anyone here. Usually we say "Sources" rather than "Resources" and yes, if they are the sources that you took the information from you should list them. You could leave a message at the Classical Music wikiproject for more help, and I am sure they would appreciate your help on related articles. Itsmejudith (talk) 16:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course.  This was actually the first Wikipedia article I wrote, and in those days, I wasn't quite as picky. So thanks. --Ravpapa (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An anonymous editor has removed the portrait of Schuppanzigh by Josef Danhauser, based on an auction note from Belvedere that identifies the subject only as "a man" - see http://digital.belvedere.at/objects/3345/portrat-eines-mannes?ctx=a3d4a356-7fe6-4b2a-a8b6-b7eb5cf852ee&idx=20
To me, this is not a convincing reference showing that the portrait is not of Schuppanzigh. Other sources - for example, http://www.universal-prints.de/english/fine-art/artist/image/josef-danhauser/6954/1/111587/ignaz-schuppanzigh---danhauser/index.htm . On the other hand, those sources aren't particularly convincing either.
What do others think? Ravpapa (talk) 16:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: On second look - I take it all back. It is not an auction house, but a museum where the painting is housed, and the entry says clearly that it is misidentified as Schuppanzigh. So the anon is right. I will look for another portrait. Ravpapa (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait of Schuppanzigh
Talk:Osteometry

message: Wikified as part of the wikification drive.  KarenAnn 15:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

message: (Request: Osteometric Indices- ratio of measurements of bone, particularly the cranium, to tell the shape of the skeleton.)
I am not entirely clear on what this request is asking for, but it is more suited to the talk page than the article body.Dialectric (talk) 07:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request moved from article body
Talk:Speeches of Max Weber

message: What is the source of the English?  Please be sure we are not infringing on the translators copyright.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 15:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Follow up to Birgitte's earlier comment.  To be able to move the pages to Wikisource, more detail is needed.  Source of the work and the English translation.  Who undertook the translation, and their life details, and when was the translation published.  All of these details are needed to make an assessment about the move to ensure a compliance to copyright laws. For the moment, I have removed the Move tag. -- billinghurst (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Wikisource
Talk:Coopworth

message: Can more information be added to this article for those of us not familiar with the Coopworth? For example, this statement "...Professor Ian Coop who headed the team in the early days" is of limited value for those of us who do not know what "the early days" means (there are no dates provided). Was this developed in the 1800s? 1900s? 2000? Thanks, Hu Gadarn 15:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology? 

message: This article would be strengthened by the addition of a picture of the Coopworth. Thanks, Hu Gadarn 15:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article's current image is small. It is requested that a better image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Coycan (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for picture 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060311030859/http://www.deerrunsheepfarm.com/cssnz.html, https://web.archive.org/web/20060429202515/http://www.americancoopworthregistry.org/breed.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:McBride

message: I cleaned up this page and added in descriptions of each of the people.  There is, however, no Wikipedia article on a "Dean McBride" and when I googled him, I found a few people, none of which were particularly significant.  I looked and the name was added by an anonymous user who had several warnings about vandalism on their talk page.  I've removed the name for now because I can't find anything but, of course, if someone knows of a significant "Dean McBride" and can help me out with that, it would be much appreciated.  Crito2161 15:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dean McBride actually S. Dean McBride is an Old Testament professor if that helps you at all  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.244.83 (talk) 22:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dean McBride
Talk:College softball

message: Article doesn't have any information not included in linked articles besides trivia. Gimme danger 16:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomination for deletion

message: — Assignment last updated by Eaglessoftball (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing and Literacy in the Digital Age