Talk:Regional television in Australia

message: (from Wikipedia:Requested moves)
====Regional Television → Regional television====
I did originally create the page through my User pages, so I could create a draft and add more info when needed. However, I had problems when I finished the article and moved it to the site proper, it was still linking to the User page. I then moved the page again, creating the two pages.
Also, there was an television station with an company name "Regional Television" and this would imply that the article is about that station, instead of the entire industy. BigDan 04:48, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
* As I understand it, you have an original article Regional Television which was originally created under User:BigDan/Regional television and then moved to where it is.  You then pasted in a copy of the text in a new article Regional television, which hasn't been edited since.  You want the article at Regional television to be replaced with the original with all its editing history intact.  If this is the case, support. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:17, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rename/move discussion 

message: I did originally create the page through my User pages, so I could create a draft and add more info when needed. However, I had problems when I finished the article and moved it to the site proper, it was still linking to the User page. I then moved the page again, creating the two pages.
Also, there was an television station with an company name "Regional Television" and this would imply that the article is about that station, instead of the entire industy. BigDan 04:48, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
* As I understand it, you have an original article Regional Television which was originally created under User:BigDan/Regional television and then moved to where it is.  You then pasted in a copy of the text in a new article Regional television, which hasn't been edited since.  You want the article at Regional television to be replaced with the original with all its editing history intact.  If this is the case, support. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 05:17, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Regional Television]] &rarr; [[Regional television]]

message: I have done a variety of maps, up for comment at Talk:List of Australian television channels, prior to me integrating them into relevant articles.  Please take a look and give me your suggestions! -- Chuq 10:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps

message: Discuss it at Talk:Section 38A..  timgraham 04:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Section 38A]] merge proposal 

message: I think this might be a good idea - if there's an article for Section 38A already (see its talk page), then there should probably be one for aggregation since it's a fairly major thing for Australian television. timgraham 04:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting off the Aggregation section 

message: See Talk:Television in Australia#Timeline of Australian television. timgraham 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Timeline of Australian television'' 

message: Not sure who wrote this: "If NBN were to take the Nine affiliation, for example, their two relays would offer programs from the Seven and Ten networks, direct from Sydney" but there is no evidence that this would be the case at all under the multi-channel proposal from the regional operators.  Yes, a station like NBN would offer a second and third signal, but there is no indication that the signals would operate pure relayed network feeds.  In fact, the regionals proposed that the 3 stations would offer complementary programming rather than competitive.  So for instance, you wouldn't have dramas competing with other dramas, etc., as often happens in competitive markets.  The programming was to be structured in a way that viewers got the maximum choice of genres available in any given timeslot.  There was not necessarily any correlation between each signal and a network affiliation, as the one local operator would own all three channels Andjb (talk) 07:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aggregation 

message: The image :Image:PrimeTelevisionident.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:PrimeTelevisionident.jpg

message: fox the tower 1.146.75.203 (talk) 09:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  poor transmission in the Gordonvale areas, no transmission at all tonight