Talk:Vinnytsia massacre

message: In the introduction, it states that the German government tried to utilise the massacre/executions for their own gain by announcing it internationally. This is clearly nonsense. Like Katyn, no mention of Vinnytsia is mentioned anywhere in the British and as far as I'm aware the US press at anytime during the war. Despite the Intternational Red Crosss and medics from neutral countries being brought in from Sweden and Switzerland to examine the bodies, the British press said nothing. 
15th September 2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.179.238 (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, most English and notably German sources refer to it as massacre. The encyclopedia of Ukraine in English lists it as such . As well, the Katyn massacre is also rendered differently in Polish as (Katyń crime) and yet rendered as massacre in English. Both crimes happened and were investigated under similar circumstances and feature in many sources together, why should this one be termed differently? --Hillock65 (talk) 11:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said, I do not feel particularly strongly about this issue and facts seem to be undisputed anyway. It's just that "mass execution" is a more precise term of what actually happened. In no way such more precise less colloquial title would whitewash the crime of the regime. And if some other articles have not so good titles, it's no reason to add one more. The main idea about being precise in titles is that the terms in titles (as well as in categories) cannot be annotated. I agree that the term is applicable to what actually happened but mass execution is just more correct and relays the contexts more precisely. Massacre can be a pogrom, an annihilation of civilians in the war, etc. Mass execution is a specific definition of what actually happened. --Irpen (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Let's see what other editors think about this issue and then the changes can be made. --Hillock65 (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I think the issue here is what do we decide as massacre or as mass execution. Massacres tend to be spontaneous, chaotic and unplanned, most of the killing is conducted in a either a savage form, or shooting from the hip style, not caring who catches the bullets. Mass Executions on the other hand would be a carefully coordinated, carefully selected victims, they would known, all would know that they are being executed. The shooting itself would be carefully staged and conducted professionally. The bottom line is that massacre involves murder, even slaughter. Exectution involves killing. The article states: that almost all of them were executed by shots in the back of the head, so it was not a vile attack of rage and savagery, they were marched out shot, and buried. That in definition is an execution. It goes irrespective weather the victim was innocent or not.  --Kuban Cossack 12:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I beg to differ. The manner in which people are murdered do not make one a massacre. Slaughter of almost 10,000 people from hip or not is a vile attack of rage and savagery. It is the public perception of it that makes it a massacre. This massacre and the one in Katyn are often viewed in conjunction, especially since the manner of execution and of investigation and discovery was the same. Even the Germans used it together in their propaganda. The difference might be in what respective Polish and Ukrainian peoples think of it. While the Katyn massacre was one of the worst in recent Polish history, what happened in Vinnytsia is dwarfed by what happened in 32/33, in Bykivnia and other places. While it is vile and gruesome, I am sorry to say, it is not the worst by Ukrainian standards. So, reference to literature might help. Normal definitions do not work all the time. --Hillock65 (talk) 14:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The historian Amir Weiner writes about it in Making sense of War from 2001: "mass graves of victims of Soviet terror". Maybe mass graves can be used in the title instead?Narking (talk) 22:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Hillock and Turgidson, you should understand the key issue behind the grievances of Irpen etc. In their hyper-POV-vision, only Ukrainian nationalists, Nazis and other evil forces of the West may commit "massacres" and "genocides". Instead, Russian and Soviet actions, as well as actions of Moscow's foreign sockpuppets, qualify only as limited and unimportant "tragedies", "mistakes" etc., as a rule. For Irpen and Co., it is a question of will, not of truth or neutrality :) Ukrained (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Instead of arguing about which is the best title it would be better to expand the text in the article. As a neutral non-Ukrainian I can understand both arguments. Massacre to me sounds like something that happened during a short period of time, like at the Srebrenica massacre in Bosnia. In Vinnytsia people were executed during several years. But on the other hand it's true that it's known as the Vinnytsia massacre in for example Encyclopedia of Ukraine. So I guess we can keep the title and go on expanding the article instead of the talk page. Narking (talk) 22:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: This paragraph:  "468 bodies were identified by people of Vinnytsia and the surroundings, the other 202 were identified on the basis of documents and evidence found in the graves. Most were identified as Ukrainians, but there were also 28 ethnic Poles.[5]"
Doesn't correspond the 5-9 thousand mentioned earlier in the article.  What is it supposed to mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.86.153 (talk) 16:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It means that less than 10% of victims were identified. The majority remain unknown. --Hillock65 (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: *Nazi occupation of the 10 out of 11 mentioned countries is not POV, it is a *fact*. Considerable pro-German sentiment in 1940s Sweden is also well-documented. What's the problem? 81.211.60.42 (talk) 08:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 10 German sattelites are already mentioned in the article. As far as Sweden's pro-German sentiment in that particular case, that is a point of view and needs to be supported by references from respectable sources. In general, speculations as to whether those scientists did their jobs well is very hard to prove irrespective whether they come from neutral Sweden or from 10 of Germany's sattelites. We can only mention where the scientists came from, to state whether they distorted their findings we need to support that with references to documents. I think the readers can make their own conclusions as to how the scientists from Germany's sattelite states and nominally neutral Sweden did their job. Sincerely. --Hillock65 (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Removed POV"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vinnytsia massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090518004957/http://www.dt.ua/3000/3150/35760/ to http://www.dt.ua/3000/3150/35760/
*Added  tag to http://memorial.kiev.ua/content/view/173/66/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently states "the Germans determined the Soviets were responsible for the massacre" and pretends to support it with a reference to a book by Douglas Tottle . However, I took the time to read this reference and in fact it states the opposite: that the Germans committed the murders while fabricating evidence to implicate the Soviets. It states in no uncertain terms the massacre was committed by SS and Ukrainian nationalist militia, and staged to look like a Soviet crime. The relevant page is 40, if anyone wants to verify it. Therefore, I'm removing this reference as it doesn't support what the text says. I suppose a balanced article should add that there are allegations that this was a Nazi crime, but I'm not ready for the edit war that is sure to ensue The andf (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tottle reference doesn't support evidence of Soviet crime -- in fact it states that the Nazis commited the massacre and implicated the Soviets 

message: If these bodies were buried in 1937 or 1938, then 5-6 years passed until 1943. However, the photo shows that the bodies did not seem to decompose, and among them people, perhaps, are looking for their relatives. For 5-6 years in the warm climate of Ukraine, the bodies would have rotted long ago, which would have been impossible to identify. The article is stupid, not neutral, written by propagandists like Nazi Germany and Cold War propagandists like Robert Conquest. Gnosandes (talk) 16:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should be. জয়শ্রীরাম সরকার (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do corpses decompose, or is it the Soviet miracle of mummification?  

message: How is this information verified? It isn't correct at all the Vinnista massacre was done by Nazi's not Russians. Here is an article from a german nazi https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/last-jew-vinnitsa-1941/
You haven't cited the most legitimate source of information The Nuremberg trials literally go against everything you are saying. Whoever is editing this article is just regurgitating USA and Nazi propaganda. 
Here is a quote from page 425 of volume 4 from the Nuremberg trials. https://www.loc.gov/item/2011525364_NT_war-criminals_Vol-IV/
" Another report lauded the leader of Einsatzkommando 4b for
his resourcefulness and skill in rounding up the intelligentsia of
Vinnitsa.
"He called for the most prominent rabbi of the town ordering
him to collect within 24 hours the whole of the Jewish intelli
gentsia and told him they would be required for certain regis
tration work. When this first collection was insufficient in num
bers, the intellectual Jews assembled were sent away again with
the order to collect themselves more of the intellectual Jews and
to appear with these the following day." (NO-2947.)
And then the report ends triumphantly on the note
""This method was repeated for a third time so that in this
manner nearly the entire intelligentsia was got hold of and
liquidated."
In Kiev a clever stratagem was employed to ensnare the Jews."
Here is another reference to Einsatzgruppe D. https://www.tracesofwar.com/sights/9885/Jewish-Mass-Graves-Vinnytsya.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigabyte1234 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, you are right, this article should be rewritten. জয়শ্রীরাম সরকার (talk) 11:55, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Scholarly consensus is that the NKVD committed the 1937-1938 Vinnytsia massacre. Attributing responsibility to the Nazis would be giving undue weight to a WP:FRINGE view rejected by modern scholars of Ukrainian and Soviet history. CJ-Moki (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolute BS of an article this is 

message: I know we are talking about Stalinism here, but nowhere does the article mention any reasoning or motivation the killers may have had for the executions.
Was it the entire population of the town? To punish the region for something? Or were the victims selected, perhaps by committing a particular crime? Were they a particular ethnic group?
80.229.146.237 (talk) 21:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification for the killings