lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abercrombie Kids

message: What are our sources for the "similarities" and "differences" sections?  ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless sources are found for this article I propose merging and redirecting it back to the main A&F article.  ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I'm no expert, but I'm not aware of the store ever being called "Abercrombie & Fitch Kids". That appers to be a misnomer.  ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Abercrombie & Fitch Kids" 

message: This article, along with all others related to A&F, must be rewritten by a first-hand expert of analyst in the apparel industry. As is, this was obviously written by an overzealous shopper--by the looks of the grammar, a pre-adolescent one.
--24.193.52.80 (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete rewrite needed
Talk:Data I/O

message: This company is not only listed on NASDAQ stock exchange, but on NASDAQ Capital Market Companies indice . Automatically qualifies under WP:AFDP --Marriedtofilm 22:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Supreme Council (Kyrgyzstan)

message: 1st para says bicameral, section on 2005 elections says unicameral. Has it gone from one to another? If so was is bicameral before 2005 and now unicameral, or is it bicameral since the tulip revolution? Or both? MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 17:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction: Bicameral or Unicameral 
Talk:Shutter priority

message: Why is the abbreviation not Sv? 86.132.136.143 04:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, but I'm not positive, that the T stands for "Time" -- i.e. the amount of time the shutter is open.  I bet you could get a definite answer at the reference desk. -- Avocado 17:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tv?
Talk:Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster

message: This article lacks history of NADC and does not link well with NAS Pax River.  I believe the old Johnsville article had more info than is presented here. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 20:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Johnsville - NADC & NAWC
Talk:John Murray (publisher, born 1778)

message: I believe that this article should be considered a stub, and, due to its import, made a focus of expansion.
74.69.230.225 (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Naval Air Station Cubi Point

message: NAS Cubi Point was commissioned on 26 July 1956.  The 1945 date is incorrect.  I was stationed at NAS Cubi in 1955 and 1956 and was present at the commissioning ceremony.
75.52.98.72 16:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commissioning date correction
Talk:Articles for the Government of the United States Navy

message: The term is still used for the Manual Of Non-Judicial Punishments (basically a list of every Captains Mast in the Navy and Coast Guard). Most people who refer to it as that have been in a few years.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.121.18.253 (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Still In Use
Talk:Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division

message: "Dual hatted" shows up in a lot of military articles on Wikipedia. As primarily military jargon, does "dual hatted" need a page of its own? Is there an entry on military jargon that might be linked to this term?  - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 19:18, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual hatted
Talk:Leahy-class cruiser

message: I really didn't think that anyone would contest the change I made, changing the definition of the hull designation of DLG from "Frigate" to "Destroyer Leader", but here we are.
If you go to the U.S. Navy's website  and search for "DLG", you will find a series of articles in which DLG is either defined as "guided missile destroyer" or guided missile destroyer leader". There are only two pages that define DLG as "guided missile frigate" and one is a copy of the other.
In addition, no one I know that ever served aboard a DLG (while it was a DLG) would have called their ship a "frigate".
The only reference to them being Frigates in the Navy.mil website is on a handful of ship histories, but not all of them.
I don't know who called them "frigates" but the Navy doesn't (and didn't) and the sailors that served on them don't (and didn't.)
I also would like to call your attention to the USS Norfolk (DL-1), the USS Mitscher (DL-2), the USS John S. McCain (DL-3), the USS Willis A. Lee (DL-4), and the USS Wilkinson (DL-5). If a DL is a Destroyer Leader, why isn't a DLG a Guided Missile Destroyer Leader?
-TCav 01:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see centralized discussion at Talk:USS Fox (CG-33). TomTheHand 15:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Albany-class cruiser

message: Several questions thoughts - the very high superstructure. Did they have any stability problems from this? Were was the Combat Information center placed in the ship? Was it just 1 level below the bridge? or much further down? Did the ship have a personnel elevator within the superstructure, to assist personnel getting to the bridge? - statements to the fact were heard in the 1980s, but no known proof. 
Wfoj3 (talk) 14:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions?
Talk:Naval Consolidated Brig, Miramar

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: http://hqinet001.hqmc.usmc.mil/pp&o/PS/psl/corrections/Presentations/Miramar%20Brig.ppt
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:53, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Powerpoint
Talk:Selective color

message: The Pop culture section does not read from a neutral POV.  The author needs to rework the entry in the encyclopedic voice with cited sources that demonstrate this particular POV is the predominant view in the industry.
Mactographer 22:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selective color: Pop culture 

message: I don't see the relevance of a plug to the  SilverFast product.  Wxidea (talk) 05:10, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like product placement to me. See this: Tannenmann's contributions He's been adding references to SilverFast everywhere. I'm removing this now. Fuzzykiller (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:   SilverFast? 

message: Is the article Selective color photography a copy of this page?--SunOfErat (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selective color photography
Talk:Truxtun class cruiser

message: "The Terrier system was later replaced with a Mk 26 Guided Missile Launching System utilizing Standard missiles". That is incorrect. Changed out missiles from Terrier to Standard ER. The Missile launcher remained Mk 10 Mod7 Guided Missile Launching System- supporting Standard ER and ASROC missles. The Mk26 Guided Missile Launching System handled either Tarter or Standard MR. The referenced external link support my statement. 
Wfoj2 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Missile Launcher.'''
Talk:S2G reactor

message: Current article reads Due to inherent problems with the concept, the Seawolf was later converted with a S2Wa Nautilus-type pressurized water reactor. That's consistent with what the S1G reactor article says, but not what the article on USS Seawolf (SSN-575) says: ADM Rickover had planned all along to standardize submarine reactor power plants. My understanding has always been that both concepts appeared sound, but Rickover chose the PWR. Andrewa 09:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inherent problems?
Talk:S2W reactor

message: what  was reactor's power, fueL used, size etc?
Or is it still secret? 
thanks
Ondrejch (talk) 07:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: reactor specs

message: This article says the S1W was installed on Nautilus while the Nautilus article says it was the S2W ... perhaps someone in the know could correct one of the articles? 218.186.12.202 (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: confusion over nautilus reactor?

message: The S2Wa reactor is basically the same as the one that was installed in the Nautilus so a separate "stub" article for it doesn't make sense. Merging that into the S2W article (also a "stub") would improve overall quality, and S2Wa would redirect to S2W. I left a note about this merge discusion in that article's talk page, if no opposition I'll proceed with the proposal. Regards, DPdH (talk) 19:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged S2Wa reactor into this article, as per Wikipedia merge guidelines. Regards, DPdH (talk) 00:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: To improve this article, some images (photos and/or diagrams) of the reactor itself and installed in a sebmarine should be added. Can anyone please help? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images neeed
Talk:S6W reactor

message: According to the MIT article previously cited , the reactor has a thermal output of 220MW and a shaft power output of 57000shp. However, an article from Global Security  states that the S6W has a thermal output of 270MW and a shaft power output of 52000shp. Currently, I’ve continued to use the figures from the MIT article while adding the Global Security article’s information on the steam turbines and the natural circulation. Nevertheless, I would like some input on how to reconcile these two conflicting sources. Thanks! Liu1126 (talk) 12:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't answer your question, but are those numbers correct? They imply a thermal efficiency of only 26%, which seems very low for a steam turbine power plant. GA-RT-22 (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Low efficiency seems to be a trend among naval reactors (like the S9G, A1B, S6G), which I also find quite odd. My best guess is that either significant amounts of power are diverted to electric generation which might not be included in shaft power, or the heat transfer in the steam generator between the reactor coolant and the secondary coolant (the water that actually goes into the turbines) isn't very efficient. Liu1126 (talk) 17:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I was just made aware that there was a RFC on globalsecurity.org before that decided it was a generally unreliable source. In this case, it would be best to go with the MIT article, so I’ll keep it as it is. Liu1126 (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactor power output
Talk:3-inch/50-caliber gun

message: What is the reference for the USCG cutter being the last U.S. ship to have the 3"/50 mount? I reported to USS San Bernardino (LST-1189) in summer 1992 and we still had two twin 3"/50 mounts. They were removed by SRF Yokosuka in late 1992 or possibly 1993 and replaced by Mk38 25mm mounts.RZid (talk) 06:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.ussbiddle.org/history/1972.pdf Has details on the July 1972 incident. The incident is summarized by DANFS, "On the night of the 19th, five MiG's attacked Biddle in two raids. In the first raid, the guided-missile frigate's Terrier missiles destroyed one of the intruders. She claimed a possible kill in the second raid and credited it to her gun batteries.". Doesn't sound certain that the 3"/50 was credited. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biddle 

message: I am restoring the deleted list as I disagrre with the single editor's characterization as "pointless".  The list illustrates just how common the gun was for a specified period.  The list also illustrates the general size range of ships mounting the gun during that period.  I suggest the list might be expanded to include the ships carrying earlier marks of the gun, if desired.  I believe such additional listing would illustrate the relative importance of the cold war anti-aircraft gun in comparison to earlier marks.Thewellman (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Ships

message: The two Mark X was installed on Battleship Texas in July 1916 (per my copy of the armament of page of the ship's Log Book.  The eight Mark XII were installed in 1921, per Log Book IronShip (talk) 18:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you certain those were 3"/50 guns rather than 3"/23 caliber guns?Thewellman (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark 10 and Mark 12 

message: The USS Conestoga, lost in 1921, was recently found. It mounted a 3"/50 caliber gun. Reference: http://www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_29677981/mystery-solved-uss-conestoga-lost-nearly-century-found
-- Dan Griscom (talk) 03:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Conestoga mounted a 3"/50 caliber gun
Talk:Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Naval Facilities Engineering Command →  – Official name change i am me (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 November 2020
Talk:NAA (radio station)

message: There are now three wikipedia articles about Cutler radio station:
# Cutler Naval Station
# NAA (radio station)
# VLF Transmitter Cutler
I shall try to merge them in one. I propose to keep the last title (VLF Transmitter Cutler). Any objections?
Sv1xv (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging three articles
Talk:Coriolis (satellite)

message: I propose the WINDSAT article be merged into this page. Near as I can tell, WINDSAT is a payload aboard Coriolis, not a separate satellite. Both articles are currently stubs, so the resulting merged article wouldn't be too long- and could maybe even be promoted past "stub". Both articles also contain redundant information, such as launch details. If the WINDSAT article was detailed and well-written, I probably wouldn't propose this. But right now, since both topics are tightly coupled and in need of much expansion, a merger makes sense. Thoughts? Cheers!Skyraider1 (talk) 11:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 
Talk:Flicka

message: The reference to IMDB's "Studio Briefing" really ought to be updated with a proper reference to the referenced / orgional  [Los Angeles Daily News] article.
TSayles 04:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB Citation 

message: I'm removing the following paragraph because it is biased as hell.  
:The American Humane Association, which supposedly protects animals in the film industry, signed off on Fox's dangerous and irresponsible wild horse race scene. They have gone out of their way to try to convince the public that animal endangerment and cruelty by Fox was just an "accident." And they supported Fox's bizarre explanation that the horse "reared" and then fell! Horses can't rear when they are running!
Sameerkale 20:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty obvious bias 

message: "Do not confuse the American Humane Association (AHA) with the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)."
Is this line at all necessary? Why does it matter in an article of this sort? Monkey Bounce 19:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need AHA and HSUS clarification in the article? 

message: The link to Mary O'Hara on this page seems to link to the wrong Mary O'Hara, namely Mary O'Hara (born 1935), an Irish singer and harpist. Can't be the right one, surely.
:Taken care of --Jesus Presley (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary O'Hara link 
Talk:Peter Horan

message: Anyone with more than a surface interest in irish music would consider Peter Horan to be notable. Wbajzek 22:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As there are notability guidelines at WP:MUSIC for this sort of thing, and I'm surely not farmiliar with Irish music, can you make an argument based on the WP:MUSIC guidelines that he's notable?  That will prevent the speedy deletion, and take it to an open forum if there's still a question in our minds about his notability.  I'd just stress that making the case he's notable in difference to the established guidelines is important.  AubreyEllenShomo 00:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I have a talk open with Mr Spunky Toffee, who marked this for WP:SPEEDY in the first place.  I have similar notability concenrs, because a google test returns 590 results.  Googling for fortune favors the merry (the CD release) returns all of 21 matches.  I think this question should go to WP:AfD, though, to get a consensus, as the guy is claimed to be notable in an area of music, and has a CD out.  I don't think this is a WP:SPEEDY candidate. AubreyEllenShomo 00:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Message received.  Since it's already tagged, and there's still no significant assertion of notability, I suggest waiting for an admin to take care of it.  If the administrator does not speedily delete it, then further action like taking it to AfD would be appropriate.  Thanks, and have a good day!  Mr Spunky Toffee 00:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

text: *At this point, unless the article author makes a notability case in accordance with WP:MUSIC, I leave it to the discretion of the admin who considers this for speedy.  If you (the admin who looks this over) don't feel speedy is right, then we'll go to AfD.  AubreyEllenShomo 00:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion with the person who marked it for speedy 

message: Please read WP:MUSIC and try to get your article up to the minimum inclusion standards listed there.  If you need my help, ask, and I'll do what I can.  I'm familiar with the inclusion criteria. Mr Spunky Toffee 00:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To the author

message: I withdraw my suggestion that this be deleted speedily so that the author may bring his article up to Wiki standards.  I don't want to bite the newcomers.  Thanks. Mr Spunky Toffee 00:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To the admin
Talk:Merrell Fankhauser

message: The sentence "he became more fascinated by legends of the lost continent of Mu, and relocated to the Hawaiian island of Maui" is unclear. One would presume it's referring to Fankhauser... but the following sentence implies that it's Cotton who left the band (Mu), rather than Fankhauser; this then suggests that it was Cotton who lost interest in the music and "became more fascinated by legends of the lost continent of Mu".
207.172.87.49 22:58, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comment - I have clarified the text.Ghmyrtle 16:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who moved to Maui?
Talk:Aktan Abdykalykov

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 00:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Two names for one person and both appear to be used by the IMDB (According to a discussion had on the help desk). Which of these two should be the main article, which should be a redirect? Please !vote below in line with Wikipedia policy. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 14:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Moneymore

message: I have nominated the page The Troubles in Moneymore for deletion, with the information there merged into this article, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Troubles in Moneymore. Sam Hayes 23:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Art Directors Guild

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:ADG Logo.jpg, found on :Art Directors Guild, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Benjamin Cooke

message: The citation for a reference to Cooke's father is in the code, but does not seem to appear on the page. I cannot see why this is. I re-entered it, but this does not seem to have remedied this matter. Maybe some other Wikipedian can take a look, abd try to fix this?Ucypanp (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicolas Théodore de Saussure

message: @User:Wikid77, you recently made an edit to this Wikiepia article, that included adding an article name to the  template. What makes you think that the name of the EB1911 article is "Nicolas-Théodore de Saussure"?
What you have to do is log onto the Wikisource encyclopedia EB1911 page s:EB1911 then to the appropriate volume in this case s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Vol 24 SAINTE-CLAIRE DEVILLE to SHUTTLE, then the subsection: s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Vol 24:6 and look up the name. In this case "Saussure, Nicolas Théodore de". 
Once you have found the volume number (in this case 24), if the article does not exist on Wikisource please go to wikipeida EB1911#External links and find the url to an appropriate page. In this case:
:https://archive.org/stream/encyclopaediabri24chisrich#page/238/mode/2up
you now have all the information you need to construct a full citation. The article name, and volume and with that, if the article has not been ported to Wikisource, it can be used to find the URL and from that the page number:
 
or if the article exists on Wikisource:
 
As most EB1911 article names are not the same as Wikipedia names (EB1911 sorts on surname while Wikiepdia uses natural order), Wikipeida never uses the same article name for more than one article, EB1911 does not need to disambiguate so it frequently does. It is for theses reasons that defaulting the EB1911 article name to the Wikipedia name is deprecated.
-- PBS (talk) 23:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  EB1911 article name
Talk:Land bridge

message: I'd fix it myself, but I don't know enough about land bridges.  I've cleaned up some of the weird grammar, but I didn't check any of the facts, and the article is still quite unencyclopedic. Tzepish 23:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, didn't look right to me either. Tzepish 05:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I think the section formerly headed plate tectonics definitely  has to stay, since the land bridge theory is a now obsolete paradigma in geology. I added in a few facts from the german article on Adolf Wegener. Zara1709 07:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Sundaland? You are welcome to improve the article - grab some good references and go for it. Vsmith (talk) 12:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article Needs Help

message: I would like to add a section describing the use of the term in freight transportation. Unlike its use in Biogeography, a landbride in the transportation context is when a waterborne shipment is transported across a landmass (continent) in order to reach a destination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Girlieuitenweerde (talk • contribs) 17:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term "Land bridge" in freight transportation 

message: Was there a land bridge between Australia and Indochina? Portillo (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia and Indochina? 

message: This sorry article contains two articles trying to get out: 
1) a poorly-cited List of land bridges
2) the text article Theory of land bridges which is reliably sourced. 
Not sure why they're both here, really. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two articles