lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Libertarianism

message: There appears to be a systemic bias in Wikipedia's coverage of libertarianism in favor of the libertarian right, which is a relatively recent (circa 1960s) and geographically limited (mostly North American) perspective. The major articles are fairly inclusive (e.g., Libertarianism), but the minor articles are not (e.g., Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property). This isn't surprising, since a large portion of editors of the English Wikipedia are probably North American, and that strain of libertarianism is strongly represented on the Internet. I hope some editors with a proper understanding of libertarianism will begin to flesh out the articles in this category to include the historic and more globally widespread strains.
:The bias is easily solved by adding all the articles about libertarianism and syndicalism or libertarianism and emma goldman or whatever the articles are.  The article libertarianism is being changed to allow other views to be more easily and seamlessly added. (Later today or tomorrow I'm taking about most of libertarian movement section and moving to new article on Libertarianism in US and creating sections to make it easier to add all sorts of groups worldwide.)
But don't complain if people who do NOT know much about these left wing movements don't do a lot of research to add the info. The talk page of libertarianism has a lot of complaints about this, plus a whole bunch of references.  But only one person has bothered to integrate some of those references into the article.  Wikipedia is what the Unpaid, Volunatry editors make it. Carol Moore 15:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is it that if I detect a bias and draw attention to it, with the hope that it will spur knowledgeable editors to action, I'm "complaining"? I intend to do what I can, but my abilities are weak, hence this call to arms. Would you be making snide remarks if I were calling for more of something you agree with?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.214.138 (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

text: This isn't the place to argue which strain of libertarianism is "correct." WP has a systemic bias in favor of the NA strain of libertarianism, which is right-wing. This is an NPOV FACT.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.214.138 (talk) 20:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So write WP:RS material on the topic. The bias exists only because there aren't any people with that perspective putting materials into articles on wikipedia, even though there are dozens complaining about the bias. 00:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic Bias 

message: Should we really have that? Given the ongoing debates on the topic at the article, we could end up with a dozen different versions, which seems a bit promotional. CarolMooreDC (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Should user pages be listed?
Talk:Kikuchiyo

message: Please do not delete this, Kikuchiyo is an important asset to know about. If more information is known about him please add it.67.166.2.146 (talk) 05:03, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want your opinion heard, please cast your vote at the article's deletion discussion page. Eldar (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Minority (philosophy)

message: I've added a paragraph to offset the highly mislead gross inaccuracies of the first paragraph which seems to suggest that Deleuze and Guattari are somehow advocating a form of identity politics.  Clearly this cannot be the case given their commitment to difference, multiplicities, and their critique of the molar and Oedipal identity (minority identities being yet another example of such Oedipalization).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.231.40.130 (talk) 16:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Minor is not Minorities 

message: The use of the word "patriarchy" in this context is at odds with Deleuze and Guattari's concept of minority, although the example used fits perfectly with the concept. Patriarchy is often used as a concept to produce the type of standard that becomes major under Deleuze and Guattari's definition, as noted in Claire Colebrook's introduction to Deleuze.
 94.196.199.232 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  patriarchy 

message: Currently, the article is pretty much incomprehensible because it obliquely describes what the concept isn't, but doesn't actually define what "minority" means as Deleuze and Guattari use it. The opening sentence should be rewritten to state the meaning precisely. 73.223.72.200 (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs definition
Talk:Chhota Chhindwara

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Chichli

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Churhat

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Neo-theocracy

message: Sources in GBooks apply this term to the Bush administration, to Pakistan under Zia, to Uganda under Amin, to something in the 1940s and 1950s, to something that Jaruzelski said he opposed the trend towards a peculiar form of, to a proposal (which may or may not have been realised) for something with respect to the Nigerian constitution in the 70s, to the Sangha (whatever that is), to something that Beuve did not quite want, to the Pesantren in Indonesia and to something I can't quite identify somehow connected to poetry. I am going to boldy redirect this page to theocracy, as the present content is uncited and I am not convinced it is anything more than an ordinary English word for a revival of, or a new type of, theocracy. James500 (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Neo theocratic" produces more results in GBooks, with the term being applied to the contents of a papal bull of the year 1302, to Henshaw Town after 1867, and to Iran after 1979. In other words, it is not clear where in time the line between "neo theocracy" and old theocracy is to be drawn. As for the claim, formerly in our article, that the term was coined after 2000, I found it attested in a book from 1955 (Stephen Spender, "Encounter", Martin Secker & Warburg, 1955, volume 5, page 73; "neo-theocratic" is attested in 1968 in John Dornberg, The Other Germany, Doubleday, 1968, page 57, where it seems to be applied, oddly enough, to the (presumably atheist) communist government of East Germany) and in several books from the 1970s to 1990s. James500 (talk) 23:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Safia Taleb Ali al-Suhail

message: I found and removed this in the article: 
:She is also the current Sheikha of the Banu Tamim tribe, which has around 1 million members mainly in Diyala province.
I really doubt that, as Tamimi , by Arabian tribes law are obliged to have a male sheikh, Please someone provide a source for Safia being a Sheikha for Tamimi before reposting. --134.102.141.159 (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Asking for It (Hole song)

message: I believe the song is notable for several reasons, which I've included in the article. I tried to sound as neutral as possible, because before it was deleted for sounding too "fanboy".
LoveLaced (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreating 
Talk:Wonga Beach, Queensland

message: Much of the content of this article is not notable. For instance, the fact that a Caltex service station sells chicken and chips is not at all significant.--Jeffro77 (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I was thinking we should have an info box for this page, as other pages in the same catagory have them. Any opinions on this?
Ekul snikta (talk) 11:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Common blanket octopus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 18:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Hi folks, I have a couple plans to make this page a bit better. I wanted to organize the information already provided in the article into a "Physical Characteristics" section and a "Behavior" section, with subsections for mating behaviors and weapon use. I also wanted to add information about their predators and possibly their taxonomy. MaddisonLessard (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: There's a strange difference between these two informations: is this species common in australian water?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.31.64 (talk) 09:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Recently, also a female blanket octopus was seen in Australian waters, see . However, it is quite likely that the Australian blanket octopuses belong to the species Tremoctopus gracilis instead of Tremoctopus violaceus, see . --130.180.18.14 (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic range and male's finding
Talk:List of 2007 motorsport champions

message: Is some taking the mick? One of these series links - V de V heads to a Spanish hip hop band? Anyone want to provide an explanation before it gets deleted? --Falcadore (talk) 08:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

message: It was suggested elsewhere that a table might look better or cleaner for this page. Si I knocked something up for thoughts - so lets have those comments...
Series     	Driver            	refer
Formula One	Kimi Räikkönen    	2007 Formula 1 season
Formula One	Scuderia Ferrari  	2007 Formula 1 season
GP2 Series 	Timo Glock        	2007 GP2 Series season
Champ Car  	Sébastien Bourdais	2007 Champ Car World Series season
--Falcadore (talk) 07:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  tabular format 
Talk:17th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: Article says the source "incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the United States Army Center of Military History." The entire first 2 sections are taken verbatim from the 17th Infantry Regiment  Association's copyrighted webpage http://www.17thinfantry.org/history/regiment.php, which I cited post hoc. Public domain notice should be removed. N0TABENE (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Public Domain?
Talk:Modesty panel

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-12-14 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Neither of these articles contain enough information to stand on their own.  They pertain to overlapping concepts and should be merged.
:Agreed and . Aldrich Hanssen (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[modesty board]] 
Talk:Miru Kim

message: Artintegrated (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Please help me out with the use of Mr., Mrs., Miss, and Ms. The Wikipedia Manual of Style(Biographies)shows three types of Honorific Prefixes: nobles, government officials, and members of royal families and popes, but is silent on Mr., etc. Is there another section of the Manual of Style that addresses this subject?
Jfsaunders (talk) 00:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:Miru Kim 

message: Large sections of text on this page were obviously plagiarized from the Bio section of her web page. Not very encyclopedic if you ask me...but nobody was asking me, and Wikipedia isn't a real encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.189.167.13 (talk) 23:25, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut & Paste Plagiarism 
Talk:21st Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: A Company became the regiment's 1st Battle Group at Warner Kaserne in Munich during July 1958. - A number of companys (5-6) built a Battle Group in the Pentomic system. So how can a single company "became" a Battle Group ? Clear that up, please. --2001:A61:599:BD01:9D22:58F3:E97C:7BD5 (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading or obviously incorrect statement reg. 1958
Talk:List of diplomatic missions in Colombia

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 22:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Araújo

message: I have edited the article removing the information of Araújo being a Spanish surname. That name has been originated in the border between Galicia and Portugal, where modern Galician language and modern Portuguese language meet. There are Spanish people, even Spanish people not born in Galicia , carrying nowadays that name, yet that does not necessarily mean that it is a name originally written in Spanish language. --Xabier Cid (talk) 17:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish
Talk:Malice in the Palace

message: The "basketbrawl"'s moniker had nothing to do with the Stooges' movie. It was merely a coincidence based on a simple rhyme (i.e., "malice" and "palace"). Whoever coined the term for this incident, probably wasn't even aware that there was such a movie, and, as such, the entire "pop culture" section should not be listed in this entry. Compare that with the SuperBowl 38 half-time debacle, in which Janet Jackson had her blouse "accidentally" torn away, which was referred to as "Tempest in a B-cup", which was "borrowed" from the expression, "Tempest in a teacup".  --Skaizun (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidental 'pop culture'
Talk:1775–1782 North American smallpox epidemic

message: Everything stated in this stub of an article comes from Fenn's book. It was listed under "Further reading", which was perhaps misleading. Changed section to "References". Removed unreferenced tag -- every statement here is from that book. Pfly (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Don't see any reference to these authors In the Reference section.  Also the Armyheritage.org site is not listed in the reference section.
Ed42311 (talk) 14:54, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are Savras and Dameron? 

message: john adams wrote abby in april 1764 about his inoculation -- as such I'm guessing the 'july' date in this article is off
also it wasn't a 'letter to his wife', she wasn't his wife yet I think
here is the letter:
http://www.masshist.org/digitaladams/archive/doc?id=L17640413ja
Abewinter (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates etc wrong for john adams
Talk:Timeline of the American Revolution

message: They seem significant. --Skintigh (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the Pine Tree Riot and Gaspee Affair be included? 

message: There is no valid justification  to exclude very relevant events because "17th century (1600s) to early to be part of an Amer.Rev. TL"
This would be similar to removing the  early seeds section in American Revolution, or the early dates in Timeline of the American Old West.
As the introductory paragraph states this is a timeline of political, social, and military aspects.  It is not a timeline of the war. However it tries to create focus for the reader.
The introductory paragraph explains how one should view the most important timeframes of this revolutionary idea.  But those whom wish to become learned will understand, via the links, the relationship, value, and connotations of the listed events.
Encyclopedia.com includes 1689 Boston revolt (the Glorious Revolution (1688), in their revolutionary war article https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/us-history/american-revolution
The history of Massachusetts website show how these early events caused "the colonist’s lingering resentment to build until it erupted in the American Revolution in the late 1770s."https://historyofmassachusetts.org/what-was-the-dominion-of-new-england/
Even a United Kingdom school level website expresses the importance of these dates that "sparked rebellion and protests from the Province of Massachusetts Bay Colony." https://schoolhistory.co.uk/notes/massachusetts-bay-colony/
This is not a elementary school book timeline, where the title of the chapter dictates.  Think of this timeline as the book. Philfromwaterbury (talk) 19:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  MUST INCLUDE THE 17TH CENTURY.    This timeline should include as much of the ''reason'' as it can. This isn't a elementary school text book.
Talk:Batangas City

message: Knowing that Bantangas City has a partnership with the small village Langenfeld (Germany), I had doubts that a partnership will exist with the nearby metropolitan city of Cologne (Germany). A list of partner cities of Cologne: http://www.koeln.de/koeln/die_domstadt/partnerstaedte 77.180.2.69 (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister City Cologne, Germany? 

message: I am currently improving this article, as a provincial capital and major city and port, we should be covering other aspects of it. I already improved the Geography and Economy section, and have plans to expand the new Culture section and recreate the Media section to include more prose. The Demographics sections may be expanded as well, especially to cover ethnicities, languages, and religion, whenever sources are available. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 19:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More improvements needed 
Talk:Yorktown order of battle

message: The French Fleet had probably 20/30 thousands sailors. Shouldn't it be included in the Yorktown OOB ? 2A01:E0A:904:D3A0:9453:F6B6:4E8:1A3B (talk) 22:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Fleet OOB is missing
Talk:Otodus angustidens

message: I have added some major improvements and corrections to the content of this article and believe that it now deserves a better ranking than Stub and recognition in paleontology portal.
LeGenD (talk) 09:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content of the article 

message: The old picture wasn't of a particularly fine specimen, or taken from a good angle, so I uploaded a better photo of a nicer, larger specimen. I'll add a scale bar if I get a chance.--THobern 13:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New picture
Talk:Alitagtag

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support. This RM is in accordance with MOS:PHIL. —seav (talk) 04:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Calatagan

message: I am not the one to do this, but I am adding this to day the Calatagan article needs cleanup -- it reads like a page from a travel advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.50.244.15 (talk) 13:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs cleanup 
Talk:Ibaan

message: You forgot to include ..
Panghayaan Elementary School in your list, maybe because we are located farthest South east of Ibaan. 
Suggest to include INFRASTRUCTURE in your list.
The bridge between Balanga and Catandala isnt repaired until now since 1983 or 1984?  Ots one reason why the population of Catandala, Mabalor and Panghayaan done increase much. On the other hand, most of Panghayaan and Mabalor residents better go to Taysan as the road is better and much safer than the 37 year old spillway. 180.195.198.102 (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education / Infrastructure:
Talk:Lemery, Batangas

message: Lemery boasts of a number of quality schools including Gov. Feliciano Leviste Memorial National High School, Payapa National High School, St. Mary's Educational Institute, Lemery Pilot Elementary School and St. Jerome International School.  Batangas State University also has a campus in Lemery.  
These schools serve the educational requirements of the municipality's residents as well as that of nearby municipalities like Taal, San Luis, Agoncillo and San Nicolas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shockwave235 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational Institutions 
Talk:Mataasnakahoy

message: The NSCB resolved the issue of the name of this town from Municipality of MATAAS NA KAHOY to its new and proper name Municipality of MATAASNAKAHOY as it legal name, based on Executive Order No. 308, dated March 27, 1932. For reference read here: http://www.nscb.gov.ph/pressreleases/2009/PR-200906-PP2-03_PSGC.asp   -- Bonvallite (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction on Name 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Highwood, Batangas. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 23:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Highwood, Batangas" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]