Talk:Brihadaranyaka Upanishad

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Looking at the name Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upanishad, I wonder why one word is italicised and not the other. Both are Sanskrita. Is upaniṣad now considered to be an English word? --Pete (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In italics 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Brihadaranyaka Upanishad's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "stephenphillips":
From Maya (illusion): Stephen H Phillips (2012), Epistemology in Classical India: The Knowledge Sources of the Nyaya School, Routledge, , Chapter 3
From Maitrayaniya Upanishad: Stephen Phillips (2009), Yoga, Karma, and Rebirth: A Brief History and Philosophy, Columbia University Press, , Chapter 1
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Brihadaranyaka Upanishad]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/quotes/brihadaranyaka-upanishad-4-4-5-6
*Added  tag to https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/jrblack/web/SKT/DL/upanishads.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130630071725/http://ebooks.gutenberg.us:80/himalayanacademy/sacredhinduliterature/lws/lws_ch-10.html to http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/himalayanacademy/sacredhinduliterature/lws/lws_ch-10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Genuinely curious why my edits were reverted. They were all sourced. Regarding WP:QUOTEFARM, half the article will have to be re-written that way. Also, a lot of spelling and grammar corrections have been reverted to older forms. 
As of now, the content has been explained from Shankara's interpretation point of view. That needs to be corrected. Is there an issue here? Yajnavalkyaas (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have retained some of your edits, and made a note of different Advaita, Dvaita etc interpretations in the discussion section where it belongs. Quotes are okay, if carefully used in appropriate section. I did remove something you added from Chari. According to Olivelle, and other scholarly translations, the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad does not open (state at the outset) what you added from Chari. See Olivelle's The Early Upanishads (pp. 29-37) for example. The Contents section of this article should summarize what the multiple mainstream secondary WP:RS such as Olivelle, Deussen etc are stating. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

text: You are welcome to add to Different interpretations sub-section. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why were my edits removed by Ms Sarah Welch?