Talk:2nd Cavalry Regiment (Australia)

message: :Image:2cav.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale for Image:2cav.gif 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.defence.gov.au/ARMY/2cav/traditions.html
** In 2/6th Cavalry Commando Regiment (Australia) on 2011-05-25 06:56:24, 404 Not Found
** In 2/6th Cavalry Commando Regiment (Australia) on 2011-06-10 04:53:10, 404 Not Found
** In 2nd Cavalry Regiment (Australia) on 2011-06-19 06:14:12, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 06:14, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Gents
I do not think the Battle Honours section should be shown in this article. Whilst 2 Cav are the custodians of 2/6 Cav battle honours from WW2 they haven't been awarded them as such and do not carry them on the Guidon.
Thoughts? DBinSydney 08:42, 7 May 2014‎ (UTC)
:G'day, DB. I think they should be mentioned as they are covered in a reliable source, but you raise a good point. I've tweaked the wording to hopefully make the situation clearer. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Cav Battle Honours 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2nd Cavalry Regiment (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150317011507/http://www.army.gov.au/~/media/Files/Our%20future/LWSC%20Publications/AAJ/2013Summer/AAJ_Summer2013_The%20Combined%20Arms%20Imperative.pdf to http://www.army.gov.au/~/media/Files/Our%20future/LWSC%20Publications/AAJ/2013Summer/AAJ_Summer2013_The%20Combined%20Arms%20Imperative.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified