Talk:Bromazepam

message: link in japanese is missing
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%AC%E3%82%AD%E3%82%BD%E3%82%BF%E3%83%B3
:Added, thanks! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: i've made a 3d spacefill for this image, along with many other benzos, as i'm trying to make spacefills for all of them. i don't want to replace the nice 3d ball and stick model. any ideas of where i could put it ? 
Ccroberts( t · c · g ) 01:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not add it to Benzodiazepine? The article is quite long, and has only one image, in the lead. By the way, the nice 3d ball-and-stick model is mine, and if you'd rather replace it instead I won't really object :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 3d Structure

message: Why is this entry almost all negative? There are many legitimate uses for Benzodiazepines, I'm a psych RN and am quite glad to have the minor tranquilizers to use on my floor. This drug like many if abused can have bad consequences, as it is I believe this article is quite biased.Bobyoung53 (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. I am not trying to be rude, but you would have to go by to the 1960's or perhaps also the 1970's to say that benzos only have bad problems if abused. Minor tranquillisers is also a very old term and was replaced I think in the 1980's with the term sedative hypnotic as it was found to be an inaccurate term for the drugs pharmacological properties by expert bodies. The problems with therapeutic use long term have been widely accepted since the 1980's. Having said that if you think that there is undue weight to the negative aspects of bromazepam in this article, feel free to suggest how we can expand positive effects side of bromazepam to bring more balance. The drug is not commonly prescribed compared to other benzos so it is fairly short in nature and not indepth. I have looked over the article and cannot find anything inaccurate in it.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 02:06, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really this bad? 

message: I AGREE WITH COMMENTS ABOVE, THIS ARTICLE IS BIASED. My apologies if not using the correct format for the talk page, I'm new to editing so please understand.
This article gives very little in the way of information on the helpful properties of this medication, or on benzos in general.  Instead it launches almost directly into an attack on the drug, giving nothing but negative information.  I'm not saying the information is inaccurate, I'm saying it's biased.  The author also seems to have a problem with benzos in general, and in my opinion goes off on a tangent in comparing how bad ALL benzos are which is not even what the article should be about.  Therefore in my opinion it should be flagged for edit based on biased source information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levontaun (talk • contribs) 02:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bromazepam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051205125434/http://www.incb.org/pdf/e/list/green.pdf to http://www.incb.org/pdf/e/list/green.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719012817/http://www.roche-australia.com/downloads/lexotan-pi.cfm?action=get to http://www.roche-australia.com/downloads/lexotan-pi.cfm?action=get
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bromazepam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081208054743/http://www.non-benzodiazepines.org.uk/benzodiazepine-names.html to http://www.non-benzodiazepines.org.uk/benzodiazepine-names.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050820030413/http://www.oita-u.ac.jp/gakui/ik-307.pdf to http://www.oita-u.ac.jp/gakui/ik-307.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified