Talk:Ōei Invasion

message: *Nakamura Hidetaka 中村栄孝, Chōsen Seisō Kigai no Tsushima seibatsu --Ōei no gaikō wo Chōsen kara miru 朝鮮世宗己亥の対馬 征伐―応永の外冦を朝鮮から見る―, Nissen kankeishi no kenkyū (Jo) 日鮮関係史の研究  上, pp. 227-289, 1965.
This paper reports in-depth research on this invasion. If you don't agree with his reasoning, his citations from and references to primary sources are surely useful. If you want to see all related sources, I recommend to read other papers by Akiyama Kenzō 秋山謙蔵 and others.
I put dates in detail because some events occurred simultaneously. They are of  the old lunisolar calendar as they are in my sources. If you prefer the Gregorian calendar, please fix them. --Nanshu 02:15, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: This article needs a Military Conflict infobox! LordAmeth 10:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Windybluesea, Did you read source really? P.L.E.A.S.E all source are distorted. Then a Korean cabinet official claimed that we cannot return them to China????? Please tell us, what is the exactly interpret. I already said, That is the distorted interpret. Notepcnako (talk) 20:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Ōei Invasion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120524174828/http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/PPN?PPN=128842709 to http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/PPN?PPN=128842709
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100122092545/http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/geschichte-japans/index.htm to http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/geschichte-japans/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930014735/http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/geschichte-japans/nengo_calc.htm to http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/geschichte-japans/nengo_calc.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051104163344/http://monthly.chosun.com/reporter/writerboardread.asp?idx=108&cPage=2&wid=dragon03 to http://monthly.chosun.com/reporter/writerboardread.asp?idx=108&cPage=2&wid=dragon03
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214154213/http://100.nate.com/EnSrch.asp?KID=12453300 to http://100.nate.com/EnSrch.asp?KID=12453300
*Added  tag to http://monthly.chosun.com/special/view.asp?sp_key=200604100213&catecode=1001
*Added  tag to http://search.hankooki.com/times/times_view.php?term=tsushima++&path=hankooki1%2F14_6%2F9811%2Ft465141.htm&media=kt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: @Qiushufang I believe all the cited information using primary sources are related to either direct casualty numbers or death numbers and no longer an issue of original research. Seeking feedback on the necessity of the maintenance tag Ayleks (talk) 22:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article is no longer primarily primary source but it could use more inline citations. Large portions of the article contain no inline citations. Qiushufang (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Primary Source Maintenance Tag