Template talk:MultiLicensePD

message: Because it's actually legally impossible to grant one's own works into the public domain in the U.S. and U.K., and this creates serious potential legal problems, I will deprecate this tag if there is no dissent for 4 days. Please see Wikipedia:You can't grant your work into the public domain for a full explanation along with some authoritative sources, including the U.S. Copyright Office. I have created the tag , which reflects the intent of this template. Deco 03:31, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please ignore the above. This template has not been retired and there was considerable dissent over the accuracy of my statements. I no longer contend that it is impossible to release one's works into the public domain - I am not a lawyer and there is no legal precedent in this matter. The link above should redirect to relevent discussion. Deco 05:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retiring 

message: Shouldn't the text at the beginning of this tag be edited to be all-encompassing, like this:
*I agree to release my eligible contributions – text, images, and/or other media – unless otherwise stated, ...
or similar?  Many users (like me!) create images that should have a similar proviso associated with them.  Thoughts?  Thanks!  E Pluribus Anthony 20:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit text in tag? 

message: I suppose I understand the logic of User:Freakofnurture's reverts to my changes ("beautification," if you will) in this edit. I understand that it may screw up the layout on some people's pages, including his own, but I did like the icons better, as they appear in Template:User Publicdomain and Template:Public domain. It's not a big deal to me though, and considering my reluctance to randomly poll a few hundred Wikipedians, I'll defer to his formatting interests. - Draeco 04:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert of icon inclusion

message:  --Anonymous Whistleblower 09:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not how it works.  You have to say here what edit you want to make, then an admin will make it for you. --Rory096 20:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request unprotect to make edit 

message: Whoever nominated this for deletion subst'd the notice template, which means that it doesn't point to the right direction.  For instance, on User:OrphanBot, the link points to Template:OrphanBot, which doesn't exist.  Would someone please replace that text with ? Hbdragon88 23:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Luna Santin 03:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit protect 

message: 
Please add GFDL where the current GFDL link is, for aesthetics. :) If you put it bold too, that'd be good. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Y Done - Nihiltres{t.l} 12:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Please replace the text under the GFDL in this template with under Wikipedia's copyright terms, per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 20:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedia licensing update 

message: Please add  to this template so that it can be found by readers.  Thanks. Adrignola (talk) 05:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , but now you can do it yourself. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category needed