Talk:Shane Carruth

message: Why is his religion here, I understand a lack of info, but expand this or delete this reference. Zendu (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know you posted this like a year ago, but it seems like this is still under contention.  I have to agree that it doesn't belong.  To me it seems irrelevant but I'm having trouble finding policy/guidelines that promote keeping it or removing it.  Any opinions?  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what there is for me to say here that I haven't already said in edit summaries.  A person's religion is a basic biographical fact, like their age, politics, birthplace, etc.  It's as relevant and appropriate to include in an article about that person as any of those things.  If it's something they've discussed publicly, then it would be part of a comprehensive encyclopedia article.Prezbo (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Yeah I think it's more out of place than anything else.  It would be like having a "Shane is white.[4]" sitting by itself.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 05:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So rewrite it if you want, but I don't think it's justifiable to remove relevant content just because it makes the article read more awkwardly.  Wikipedia articles aren't generally noted for their readability in any case.Prezbo (talk) 06:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: I've contacted the author of this image and have suggested he change the image's license to a Wikipedia-compatible one. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 21:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Success! Image has been added to the article. Thank you Jonathan Crow! Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 22:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free-Licensed Image Search 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shane Carruth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.atopiary.com/
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://motherboard.vice.com/read/we-talked-to-shane-carruth-about-the-human-drama-behind-the-modern-ocean
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705022206/http://www.makingthefilm.com/interview21.html to http://www.makingthefilm.com/interview21.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I've reverted the addition of Carruth's middle name again per WP:BLPPRIVACY. To include the full name, it must either be (a) widely published by reliable sources, or (b) published by the source in a way that we can infer they're okay with it being made public. An example is . That's not the case here. If Carruth's middle name—or date of birth, for that matter—ever does get widely published by reliable sources or unambiguously by Carruth himself, then we can include it. WP:BLP is clear that we need to be cautious and conservative when it comes to claims about living persons. Woodroar (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name 

message: The "years active" in the infobox goes to 2020... I was looking for a cite of this in the article (or at least a comment justifying it), but found nothing. Anyone know why this is asserted as the effective end of his career? Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 06:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a tough one. He's said in interviews that he's quitting filmmaking, as mentioned in the "Unrealized or upcoming work" section. That was still true as of 2020, according to this interview from May. Then that June he released the script and most of the score for The Modern Ocean on Twitter, and The Playlist said it's dead unless it gets financed. The AV Club says , though—so that last project wasn't The Modern Ocean? And after that, all of the abuse allegations came out. I guess what I'm saying is, the 2020 end date isn't sourced and could be removed. However, we have no sources saying that he is working on anything post-2020, either. Woodroar (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think I was picking up on that tricky issue as I was reading the article, and looking for clarification. I guess, as you say, it should be removed for the time being? Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 05:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It still feels there's no closure re: that "massive thing" quotation in the article, in any case, when you look at the 'timelines' of the other projects? Peace and Passion ☮  ("I'm listening....") 05:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's so uncertain with that potential "one last thing" out there. In any case, I went ahead and changed "2020" to "present". We can always change it back if/when other sources appear! Woodroar (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not active after 2020