Talk:The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series)

message: This page requires a good amount of editing. Phrases like "they were are made available through CBS All Access when watching the full episodes" make no grammatical sense at all ("were are"? and who is doing the watching?), which makes reading this page a labor. Someone with strong writing skills should really give this page a makeover.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.74.7 (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Needed

message: The page looks a lot better. I added a small section at the beginning, and the season-by-season breakdown is solid. I think it meets the Good Article criteria. But maybe, maybe not, we'll see how it goes. - Zone46 03:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Better

message: None of the images have Fair Use Rationales, otherwise this is a good nomination. Add the rationales and re-apply (see WP:FAIR) Cheers, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 22:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I added the rationales correctly (I'm new to this image stuff), so I've renominated the page. - Zone46 15:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first Shatner picture does not look like a screenshot of that episode.  It looks like a staged publicity photo on the set of the episode.  Image should be tagged accordingly.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 20:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed GA 

message: On hold for: lead too short, fair use rationales are weak--see other FA/GA articles for examples, several unfootnoted quotes, and should have a notice at the top about the other Twilight Zone articles.Rlevse 22:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do I footnote the quotes? They are all quotes from the Twilight Zone Companion, which is referenced at the bottom of the page. - Zone46 21:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GA awarded. Though I'm concerned with the breadth of the article. Could we see some more sections be added to this one so that critics and development be shown. Lincher 01:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a development section a month or two ago, so I'm not sure how else to expand it. As for critics, there are quotes from several critics included in the article (from The Twilight Zone Companion), both positive and negative. - Zone46 01:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Second GA nomination

message: Hey, everyone, there is a second Wiki-article on The Twilight Zone (called The Twilight Zone).  To me, it is signigicantly different from this article (it tells the Twilight Zone story more from a producer and writer point of view).  Can we maybe RENAME this article (i.e. The Twilight Zone (Season by Season History)) or something like that?  I don't think we should MERGE these two articles.  I like them both as they are.  User:ProfessorPaul19:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't rename or merge. The Twilight Zone is about the whole series in general. (See Star Wars) while this page is only about the original series. There is also a page on The New Twilight Zone. - Zone46 22:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename or Merge?

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 03:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: I've been reading various episode articles listed on List of The Twilight Zone episodes and I noticed some (minor) style errors common to most of them - 
1. They have an unusual section at the bottom that is redundant because these articles are already accessed in the Infobox on the right. Back to: The Twilight Zone, Episode List, Season 1
This is sometimes listed under "Twilight Zone links", but is still not needed when the infobox has all the relevant links. This appears to date back to 2002, before the infobox was added.
2. The "External link" section is often placed in the middle of the article, but it should always be placed at the end (and called "External links", even if there is only 1 link)
3. Now a seperate subcategory exists for :Category:The Twilight Zone episodes, the episode articles should be removed from the main :Category:The Twilight Zone. This is the point of having a subcategory and will make :Category:The Twilight Zone episodes much easier to use. 
I'll start working through season 1.  Magiclite 23:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someday, in a perfect world, we'll have something like Wikipedia:WikiProject The Simpsons/Style guide for the Twilight Zone episodes.  Like many (most?) Wikipedia TV episode pages, they're all over the map today in terms of consistency between pages.  It's going to be a monumental task to fix them, but it would be nice if someone who knows how could get the ball rolling. Travisl 21:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:WikiProject The Twilight Zone.  Thoughts? Travisl 04:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements to individual episode articles 

message: The image :Image:It's A Good Life.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:It's A Good Life.JPG

message: In what capacity will the show be celebrating its anniversary on CBS? A retrospective special? Prime-time airings of classic episodes? 67.49.175.253 (talk) 09:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  50th anniversary 

message: :This discussion is transcluded from Talk:The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
===GA Sweeps: Delisted===
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I believe the article currently has multiple issues that need to be addressed, and as a result, I have delisted the article. Although several references are listed, there are no inline citations for the article's content which is required under the criteria. Add additional citations from a variety of sources to provide a balanced representation of the information present. Perhaps sources can be pulled from the main articles linked to within the article. Look to books, magazines, newspaper articles, other websites, etc. Take a look at the non-free images in the article and determine if they are actually representing the text or if they are just being used for decoration. If its for decoration, remove them from the article. Although the article has been delisted, the article can be return to GA status by addressing the above points. Once sources are added and cleanup is done, I recommend renominating the article at WP:GAN. If you need assistance with any of these issues, please contact me on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Reassessment

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I believe the article currently has multiple issues that need to be addressed, and as a result, I have delisted the article. Although several references are listed, there are no inline citations for the article's content which is required under the criteria. Add additional citations from a variety of sources to provide a balanced representation of the information present. Perhaps sources can be pulled from the main articles linked to within the article. Look to books, magazines, newspaper articles, other websites, etc. Take a look at the non-free images in the article and determine if they are actually representing the text or if they are just being used for decoration. If its for decoration, remove them from the article. Although the article has been delisted, the article can be return to GA status by addressing the above points. Once sources are added and cleanup is done, I recommend renominating the article at WP:GAN. If you need assistance with any of these issues, please contact me on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps: Delisted

message: Please add tech details about the video format.  The shows must have been originally broadcast NTSC.  Monochrome or color?  But they were made on film?  Do any of those film-based masters still exist?  Are all remaining copies limited to old-school NTSC resolution?  Do any HD versions of any episodes exist? -96.237.15.90 (talk) 02:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  video format 

message: In the show Futurama there is a quite obvious reference to The Twilight Zone.  Which episode escapes me, but there was one with a show called "The Scary Door."  It was extremely similar to The Twilight Zone, starting from intro to end.  Halofanatic333 (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add another pop culture reference 

message: from the opening: "...and usually ended with some sort of message."
the meaning there is unclear; is 'moral' message intended? 76.105.151.238 (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was under the impression that it was referring to the epilogue by Serling (which usually does contain a moral message). But, I'm glad you brought this up, because the lead section needed some improvements. Hopefully the changes I've made are satisfactory to all. --Musdan77 (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  message 

message: Someone undid a revision I made saying "headings can't have links".  However, I notice they didn't make any changes with the heading, but removed a sentence at the bottom saying the first season openings have been restored--Robert Treat (talk) 00:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, don't know how that happened, but you could have (and should have) notified me on my user talk page. Then, I would have known sooner and could have fixed it sooner. --Musdan77 (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  latest changes 

message: While the bulk of this New York Times DVD review article covers other titles, it does end with:
THE TWILIGHT ZONE: ESSENTIAL EPISODES For those unwilling to invest in the 25-disc set containing all 156 episodes of Rod Serling’s influential TV series, these two discs cull 17 episodes. The picks include civil rights and anti-McCarthy allegories like “The Eye of the Beholder” and “The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street,” the doomsday visions “Time Enough at Last” and “The Midnight Sun,” and two of the best nervous breakdowns in TV history, William Shatner’s crackup in “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” and Telly Savalas’s freakout in “Living Doll.” (CBS DVD)
Additional corroborating links are:
*http://www.amazon.com/Twilight-Zone-Essential-Anniversary-Collection/dp/B00JKTFQH4
*http://www.mediamikes.com/2014/07/dvd-review-the-twilight-zone-the-essential-episodes/
Conrad T. Pino (talk) 03:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. --Musdan77 (talk) 18:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2014 Compilation - The Twilight Zone: Essential Episodes 

message: Each episode of this 1959 on series starts with: "There is a fifth dimension, etc". Two years earlier, the film: "Not of this Earth" (1957) has the beginning (words on the screen): "You are about to adventure into the Dimension of the Impossible! To enter this realm you must set your mind free from the Earthly fetters that bind it! If the events you are about to witness are unbelievable, it is only because your Imagination is chained! Sit back and believe that YOU may cross the brink of time and space.. into that land you sometimes visit in your dreams!"(84.236.152.71 (talk) 17:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: A borrowed beginning?

message: Seems pretty darned significant, not sure why  thinks this is original research... a quick Google search can give u numerous sources, not sure how to cite though Peace is contagious (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits (, ) included no referenced information or sources. This information needs to meet WP:V and follow guidelines in WP:CS. AldezD (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The edits also read like they were lifted straight from another source.  --Drmargi (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: some1 else on Wiki wrote them under a specific TZ episode, seemed better here. Peace is contagious (talk) 17:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The source you added in  is a fansite message board and does not meet WP:V. Please stop adding this content without addressing the earlier linked guidelines. AldezD (talk) 17:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  This book should satisfy even the most anal-retentive of pedants:
https://books.google.com/books?id=MqtTBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=twilight+zone+6+videotape+episodes&source=bl&ots=-pVPZtIu4M&sig=xn8w11dI9lzZa8qbGEDlkcqDDls&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjg_f2jj4nKAhXJ9h4KHUv7CFIQ6AEITjAH#v=onepage&q=twilight%20zone%206%20videotape%20episodes&f=false
Peace is contagious (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  6 Video-taped episodes of ssn 2 

message: Discussing Serling's promotional spots in season one, the article says "a few are lost completely and some survive only as audio tracks; however, they are all available through CBS All Access when watching the full episodes."  This makes no sense, if some are lost completely, how can they all be available? This needs to be clarified.  CodeTalker (talk) 02:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promo spots lost or not? 

message: Was the opening narration for season 5 the same as used in season 4?  Elsquared (talk) 03:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  season 5 narration 

message: I'm not sure if this information should be added to the article about the series, or the articles about each episode. Anyway, here's the info and the archived sources.
#The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street (1960) 
#It's a Good Life (The Twilight Zone) (1961) 
#To Serve Man (The Twilight Zone) (1962) 
#The Invaders (The Twilight Zone) (1961) 
#The Hitch-Hiker (1960) 
#Living Doll (The Twilight Zone) (1963)  
#Nightmare at 20,000 Feet (1963) 
#Walking Distance (1959) 
#Time Enough at Last (1959) 
#The Eye of the Beholder (1960) 
Mateussf (talk) 02:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best 10 episodes according to Time magazine 

message: Richard Egan was to have been the narrator, but was unavailable due to contract issues, so Serling himself did the narration. Carlm0404 (talk) 23:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not included because source needed? 

message: Were the DVD releases really the very first home-media releases? No VHS? No laserdisks? No 8 or 16mm home-movie releases? --2003:DA:CF04:959:914A:DC7C:523D:F23 (talk) 12:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home media