Talk:Lithium (Nirvana song)

message: One of two things need to happen to this section; either the assertions within need to be cited, or it needs to be removed. Unsourced, subjective interpretations do not belong in this entry. ---Jackel 03:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interpretation" section is completely subjective and unsourced. 

message: Now that Evanescence have a song called Lithium, should this article be moved to Lithium (Nirvana song)? U-Mos 18:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No one really seems to care about this, so I will say that I will move this article on the 10th if there are no further protests. U-Mos 11:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you mean when you say no one seems to care about it. I care. So far, you have one oppose (me) and no support. There's no consensus for a move yet. Kafziel Talk 14:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Redirecting the Evanescence article is fair enough, but if the article reappears when there is more info on it (which it almost certainly will), should this page be moved? U-Mos 16:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are a lot of "ifs" involved. If WP:MUSIC is expanded to include the requirements for individual songs, then it remains to be seen whether that song will qualify. If it does qualify, it will need sources to be recreated. But, yes, if that song becomes notable and the article becomes viable then at that point we could revisit the move request and I would probably support it. Kafziel Talk 16:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, but singles are not necessarily notable just for being singles. If it reaches the top 20 on the charts, or if it's on a movie soundtrack, or if it becomes Evanescence's signature song, then it might be notable. Or it might not. Kafziel Talk 16:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move to [[Lithium (Nirvana song)]] 

message: I know that we are not supposed to be including component charts of the Hot 100, but the Lithium peak of number 31 on the Hot Singles Sales chart, and which was actually the equivalent chart of pretty much every other country's national charts which were based on sales, can be sourced from page 85 of the August 15, 1992 issue of Billboard magazine as linked here:  QuintusPetillius (talk) 20:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now also coming to the main Billboard website, as per URL:  .QuintusPetillius (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Billboard Singles Sales peak 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Lithium (Nirvana song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Azerrad":
From Negative Creep: 
From Breed (song): 
From Drain You: 
From Endless, Nameless (song): 
From Serve the Servants: 
From Grunge: 
From Polly (Nirvana song): 
From Been a Son: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Lithium (Nirvana song)]]