Talk:Battle of Asal Uttar

message: This article refers to only one source from an Indian based website.
This article definitely needs the Pakistani side. Whoever wrote whatever is extant obviously has an Indian POV.
Now that a Pakistani went through this article, it has been totally destroyed and needs to be rewritten. It used to be informative earlier. 
Indian forces fought the battle in front of the village of Khem Kheran, the pakistanis advanced from the northwest, at no time did the town ever leave indian possession so there is no question of taking it back. As is written this article makes no sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.8.61 (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased source? 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: hi, this reference The M47 and M48 Patton Tanks By Steve Zaloga says that "india claimed" to have destroyed 67 pakistani tanks at the battle. The article mentioned 97 tanks ??? so what is it ? is there no one watching for POVs here ????
more over i am still waiting to see a reference that mentioned indian casualties (i.e tanks destroyed or damaged) there is no reference here that mentions it. beside those fake references that dont have figures for casualties at all. When talking about a reference i mean to say a reliable wikipedia refrence a third party reference. An indian reference if included here must have a note with it saying "indian claim". Only this way we can achieve the neutrality of article
for the time being i am removing indian casualties untill a refreence is provided.
regards.
الله أكبرMohammad Adil 16:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have did some copy editing to the article making it more like a military article. I think now it reads like a neutral article isn't it ?
Any thoughts ?
regards
الله أكبرMohammad Adil 22:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  casualties 

message: I am unable to find this in the source provided by SMS However this source says the battle was a crushing defeat for Pakistan. The M47 and M48 Patton Tanks p33 Darkness Shines (talk) 20:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalemate? 

message: The Pakistani forces were defeated because they were lured into a flooded plain. This is not "the Pakistani forces being repulsed [due to]... the conditions of the plains, better Indian tactics and a successful Indian strategy", but rather the absence of effective reconnaissance, and a successfully Indian tactic of encircling the Pakistani forces and restricting their mobility by the use of flooding.119.224.100.246 (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The talk page is not intended for general discussion of the subject matter, but for discussion on how to improve the article.  Do you have something to say on that subject? BMK (talk) 22:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for outcome 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Battle of Asal Uttar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101073406/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com:80/LAND-FORCES/Army/Patton2.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Army/Patton2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified