Talk:Bijou Phillips

message: Worth discussing the Calvin Klein ad controversy? Sodfijd 19:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Calvin Klein ad controversy

message: Is it worth mentioning her small guest role on "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" in the episode: "Kiss Kiss, Bye Bye"? Imidazolidinyl 20:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSI 

message: G.-M. Cupertino—I'm sorry you took issue with some of my edits. Since you reverted them whole hog, I'm afraid you threw out some that were not only valid but correct Wikipedia format. I'm going to go back and re-add those changes, leaving any valid new edits of yours intact.
The unsourced information I removed had been tagged as unsourced for 9 or 10 months. Since reliable sources were not found, removal was absolutely valid. IMDb is not a reliable source, as you've been told on your talk page in the past. If you can find verifiable references in a reliable source, the information may certainly be replaced. Additionally, your edits to the Filmography are off-format. Also, regarding a comment in your edit summary—Door on the Floor was was removed from an over-long list of "recent" works, it was still in the Filmography.
Please address any issues you have with my edits here on the talk page rather than simply reverting them. Precious Roy (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits of 19 Aug 2008

message: Since there's not enough room in the edit summary to explain, here's what I've changed:
*The header in the filmography should be "Title" not "Film" as a number of items are not films (e.g. a video game, a music video, TV shows)
*The Sublime music video she appears in may have be later compiled on a collection of their videos but that was not its original format
*There should only be one "year" entry per year not a separate one for TV. If you have to have a link to "2006 in tv", separate all the TV shows, etc. into a separate list. I would oppose that but would not revert.
*Chelsea on the Rocks has been released (shown at festivals) and her role is not "?"—it's a documentary, she appears as herself.
Hope this all makes sense. If you disagree, please discuss here. Precious Roy (talk) 19:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the "film" heading altogether as the Note column should reflect as to whether it's a film, tv episode, video game, etc. Sometimes I separate the films from the TV work, but I also don't think it's necessary here. And all links lead to the proper media should anyone need further information. — WylieCoyote (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits of 9 Sep 2008

message: "My grandparents didn't take any pills, and they were fine," Phillips said in the February issue of   
 Paper. "Just buck up and get over it. Stop being such a f---king pansy."
My 2 cents... I don't see how relevant this is to the biography, much less for the the lead line. - Hawkbreeze (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's clearly pejorative, and there's clearly no reference for it. When you see stuff like that, particularly in a BLP article, there's no need for a discussion about its appropriateness - it absolutely has to go, and can't be restored until someone cites a reliable source. So I've removed it.  The article has recently come under attack by the same person (editing under another IP from the same ISP) who added "Scientologist!" and "Indoctrinated Scientologist!" in front of Phillips and a number of other people, and falsified the titles of magazine articles to that effect. I've removed that too; even if there were cited evidence that she is a Scientologist, we don't shriek everyone's religion each time we mention their name, any more than we'd write "Indoctrinated Catholic" in front of every Pope. Character Set (talk) 11:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I've also removed the category "American Scientologists", as none of the references appears to support that claim either. Character Set (talk) 11:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal of deletion of a section

message: She has recently contacted the media with her thoughts about the allegations of incenst that Mackenzie Phillips has made against her father John Phillips. This is probably worth including. Catherineyronwode (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Her opinion of John Phillipds amd Mackenzie Phillips

message: There is an awful lot of 'career' in the 'early life' section. Both need a rewrite. Dadsnagem (talk) 14:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life 

message: I see several references online to her sexual orientation, and even strain on her marriage to Danny Masterson due to her interests. It need not be titillating, but it's happened several times over the years, and probably deserves a mention. --69.124.112.126 (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bisexuality 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bijou Phillips. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071028143342/http://www.timeout.com:80/film/news/1754/?DCMP=OTC-RSS-Film to http://www.timeout.com/film/news/1754/?DCMP=OTC-RSS-Film
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101006002203/http://www.maxim.com:80/girls/articles/92174/2000-hot-100.html to http://www.maxim.com/girls/articles/92174/2000-hot-100.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080913090752/http://www.eonline.com:80/celebrities/profile/index.jsp?uuid=82a8a1d3-3f65-40f2-9e56-3740e1828ab3 to http://www.eonline.com/celebrities/profile/index.jsp?uuid=82a8a1d3-3f65-40f2-9e56-3740e1828ab3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Almost Famous did win 1 Academy Award.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.189.88 (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost Famous 

message: The same editor keeps historically deleting the same sections of the cited sentences about the actress' bullying behavior on the set, which the actress herself has acknowledged publicly. With no reasons given and nothing on the talk page. Jooojay (talk) 05:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I’m new to editing but got here from the Danny Masterson page and noticed that the caps lock in the Beginnings section seems very aggressive and unlike the usual neutral Wikipedia tone. Is anyone else bothered by this? I don’t know enough about the topic to fix it. Kem823 (talk) 03:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  “CLAIMED” - beginnings section 

message: According to his page, he did not die of an overdose - he had drugs in his system but likely died of a combination of factors including complications from thassalemia. 70.15.87.108 (talk) 00:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Davide Sorrenti 

message: I want to make a note of the inappropriate OWNership behavior in the recent history of this page, before it becomes necessary to escalate and invite other, more experienced eyes here. 
In my limited understanding of talk page norms, it would not be appropriate to name/ping the person whose behavior I'm concerned by, but I've already started engaging in user talk dialogue with them (with little success so far). Viewing the edit history here, you can see immediate RVs of edits to this page by a single editor- in the case of changes I made in good faith, they clearly didn't even read what they were reverting, as they had to re-RV an error they introduced.
What concerns me is the inclusion of an UNDUE statement about the actress's nudity in a role for which there seems to be no notable coverage around said nudity. Lord knows we wouldn't be struggling with these creepy little tidbits sneaking into MALE actors' pages, but en.wiki has no existing issues with fostering discomfort for female readers and editors, amirite? 😡
To be clear, I do not think this editor with the OWN problem has any creepy intentions themselves, they are just reverting any changes that they themselves didn't make. The unfortunate side effect of this, though, is ignoring the perspective that this is actually creepy and inappropriate content to include in an encyclopedia without clear context for its importance. Chiselinccc (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right it is creepy. I have also noticed this same editor has also made edits to her husband's article to remove his felon status from the first sentence. Jaydoggmarco (talk) 23:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  OWNership behavior on this page