lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karol Szwedowski

message: This article is just a traslation of the pl:wiki one, with some things about Westerplatte.
Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 20:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the section about the Battle of Westerplatte; it appears to be an early version of that article, and shouldn't be taking up space in this article. Also, the bit about Szwedowski's son being "murdered by the Germans" is highly POV. Someone who has a reliable source as to what happened to him needs to fix that line so it's not so blatantly anti-German. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 04:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source pl:wiki
Talk:Hitch (knot)

message: it is not listed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.13.106 (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toggle Hitch 

message: It would be nice if there was brief description of the use or other attribute of each hitch that distinguishes it from the others. Jake (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This suggestion appears to have been sufficiently acted upon. WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than a list of names? 

message: There are several knots listed on this page which do not have associated Wikipedia entries, descriptions or photos. If you have information about them, please create a page and link it, so this page becomes more complete. If you happen to know that a knot is obviously non-existent or merely a colloquialism of another knot, please remove it. WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal or creation of non-existent knot pages 

message: I have heard that there is a difference between knots, hitches, and bends. Do they all fall under the "knot" family? Or are they completely different things? Either way, I am placing this section here to facilitate discussion. Here is an article for your consideration: http://www.ultimatebvi.com/sailing/knots/ WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitch-knot or hitch 

message: I made a sandbox and added the entry in the table for the Garda Hitch.
User:Swa1111/Sandbox2
Swa1111 (talk) 1:59, 06 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garda Hitch 

message: Has nobody a photo of a Cleat Hitch?   It's not a difficult hitch to make, a little similar in parts to a Becket. I'm surprised it's not here...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2C4A:1CB0:49F7:66FF:1954:3ABD (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleat (or Signalman's) Hitch 

message: That description is a double half-hitch. I propose, instead, this description: "Three intersecting loops that tighten when pulled".  Buchskj (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clove Hitch is NOT Two Successive Half-Hitches
Talk:Chris Anthony (American football)

message: I looked up Chris Anthony trying to find the Adventures in Odyssey announcer/narrator.  This is clearly not her. --24.167.191.204 03:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no disambiguation page?
Talk:Thermophobia

message: :In medicine, a thermophobic foam consisting of 0.1% betamethasone valerate was found to be at least as effective as convention remedies for treating dandruff. In addition, the foam is non-greasy and does not irritate the scalp.
This makes little sense to me.  Betamethasone is a corticosteroid.  In what way is this substance thermophobic, and how do its thermophobic properties assist in combatting dandruff?  The reference given is to some journals database that requires subscriptions, so I can't verify this one way or another. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the additional reference.  That makes it somewhat clearer. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Dandruff]]?
Talk:Trout tickling

message: This is seperate from noodling, as far as I can tell.  It should not be merged.  
Paladinwannabe2 20:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: lovely page here on guddling - http://home.bendbroadband.com/scottishheritage/trout.html - and is it possible a citation could be included on "illegal in britain"?  why would it be illegal?  kids here (at least on vancouver island) guddle for salmon quite often, and very successfully, in the spawning season.  renewable energy works 03:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That website is dead now; here is the latest copy: http://web.archive.org/web/20111111193934/http://home.bendbroadband.com/scottishheritage/trout.html Wingman4l7 (talk) 00:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Illegality in Britain

message: I have a copy of this graphically illustrated fly fishing manual which has a section on "Guddling-Tickling" (catching trout with bare hands).
:
Unfortunately I do not have access to this book at the moment so I cannot add its information & a citation myself, so I've posted this in case anyone wants to follow up on it; all that citation needs is a page range!  Wingman4l7 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional source 

message: From a neutral point of view, I was wondering what modern justifications for trout tickling's illegality in several jurisdictions do people give – and other people over the years have been wondering the same thing. 
So I searched for its reasoning and found a news article from 2004 with such a justification: a UK Environment Agency representative has said that trout tickling targets especially vulnerable spawning fish, disturbs the environment's gravel, and that it puts future fish stocks at risk.
From what I understand, this may be a politically contentious issue, so I wanted to give a heads up before adding an NPOV sentence with this citation. Something like:
If anyone thinks this should be tweaked, let me know; I'll add this after a while. Samppi111 (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding citation about justification for illegality
Talk:Crow Creek massacre

message: I miss any account about when and how the site was discovered, as the article says it was protected in the 60s but the massacre only in the 70s, which makes no sense without additional information 47.64.245.228 (talk) 10:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There may have been other archaeological sites in the Crow Creek area that warranted protection and designation, and only much later, with further survey work, were the bones discovered, and the massacre site excavated. But I agree the reader shouldn't have to speculate like that, it could use a detail or two to tie it all together. Boneyard90 (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Added a "Legacy" section to show the influence of this discovery and study of such a large group of human remains, as well as the agreement reached with Native Americans about reburial - issues discussed, and influence on the World Congress in South Dakota, as well as later legislation in SD, Canadian provinces, and US federal laws, especially 1990 NAGPRA. Parkwells (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Legacy section

message: Hello, a reader would assume that an article about a massacre would describe some sort of attack and killing of people, but the lead just says that the Crow Creek massacre occurred at this time, in this place, there was an excavation, some background about who lived there, some presumably defensive information, then finally some mention of an attack. Why is it beating around the bush? It's only in the fourth paragraph that it really begins explaining what the massacre was so that we can actually use any of the contextual information already provided. 2600:8800:239F:A900:387D:29B0:D8CE:7923 (talk) 15:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of 'massacre' in the lead of this article about a massacre
Talk:Hollow Horn Bear

message: Moving this to talk, can be replaced with sourced. It's messing with my understanding of the chronology. GMGtalk  17:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to talk 

message: This is... someone playing the character? This is supposed to be almost six months after his death? GMGtalk  17:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  For later I guess 

message: "Hollow Horn Bear is long with the 'white man's game,' as he calls the art of conversation. In truth, he has most white men lashed securely to the bowsprit and the sinking head on, when it comes to the art of the talk. He comes every once in a while to talk a few hundred thousand out of the stony-ghearted bureau of Indian affairs."
GMGtalk  21:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Oration

message: "After the uprising of 1889 and 1890, in which Sitting Bull and scores of other notable Indians were killed at the battle of Wounded Knee in South Dakota, Hollow Horn Bear became a good Indian and from that time forward was one of the leading influences for good and prosperity among his people on the Rosebud reservation." 
Not clear how reliable this contemporary source is, but seems to jive with modern sources somewhat as far as general shift in attitude/approach. This is talking about c. 1890 though, which is well before conversion to Catholicism, around the time of negotiations with Crook. Not clear what may have precipitated the shift. May have been much more gradual than this source makes it out to be. GMGtalk  16:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Shift?

message: Son asks to be in 1917 inauguration. GMGtalk  16:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Son

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Hollow Horn Bear LCCN 2016858434 (2) (cropped).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 2, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-08-02. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Hollow Horn Bear LCCN 2016858434 (2) (cropped).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: If it can be acertained completly - perhaps there is more news Stateside, we could include this information. --Wuselig (talk) 16:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it; there is reliable coverage in US sources. Powerful news! Parkwells (talk) 15:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return of shirt by German Museum
Talk:Mount Moriah Cemetery (South Dakota)

message: I moved this page because of other cemeteries by the same name. --evrik (talk) 16:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move

message: Finished copy-editing. The article needs to be checked by someone who is familiar with the area.
Hope it reads okay Pheebalicious (talk) 00:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-edited
Talk:Daniel Torres (cartoonist)

message: Suggesting that (comic book artist) is incorrect per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline and ought to fall in line with all the others using (comics). Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? MURGH disc. 03:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unopposed move completed. MURGH disc. 17:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Category talk:Landmarks in South Dakota

message: List of all pages in category Landmarks in South Dakota retrieved by PockBot.PockBot is currently Undergoing Trials. If you have any comments on its performance please leave them at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/PockBotArticleClass / StatusBadlands National Park?? (not yet classified)Black Hills National CemeteryStartCorn Palace?? (not yet classified)Fort Meade National Cemetery?? (not yet classified)Hot Springs National Cemetery?? (not yet classified)Minuteman Missile National Historic Site?? (not yet classified)Mount Rushmore?? (not yet classified)South Dakota State Capitol?? (not yet classified)Wall Drug?? (not yet classified)Wind Cave National Park?? (not yet classified)The Journey Museum and Gardens?? (not yet classified)Kuhnert Arboretum?? (not yet classified)McCrory Gardens and South Dakota Arboretum?? (not yet classified)De Smet Cemetery?? (not yet classified)Mount Moriah Cemetery (South Dakota)?? (not yet classified)Saint John Cemetery (Union County, South Dakota)?? (not yet classified)List of Registered Historic Places in South Dakota?? (not yet classified)Bear ButteStartCoughlin Campanile?? (not yet classified)Dakota Wesleyan University?? (not yet classified)Fort Randall, South DakotaStubMellette House?? (not yet classified)South Dakota School for the Deaf?? (not yet classified)Watertown Stadium?? (not yet classified)Yankton College?? (not yet classified)List of South Dakota state parks?? (not yet classified)Custer State Park?? (not yet classified)Palisades State Park?? (not yet classified)PockBot 21:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PockBot - Category articles summary as of 21:31:43, Wed Dec 6, 2006
Talk:List of newspapers in South Dakota

message: I add a reference for the South Dakota Newspaper Association Directory for the first few newspapers.  Others should be check and the reference added.  The frequency of publicaiton, year of establishment, and ownership could be added to the table to make it more complete.
User:G._Moore Talk  13:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:List of football clubs in Austria

message: Have all of the "other" clubs actually played in the Bundesliga? I just added ASK Schwadorf, who haven't played in the top flight, without reading the note at the top. If there are others listed who shouldn't be there, we should either delete those or adjust the note to accommodate all Austrian clubs regardless of the level they've achieved in the past. - Dudesleeper 20:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Free-for-all?
Talk:Pride Shockwave 2006

message: http://www.nokaut.com/?id=12&solo_news=592&lang=e&cur=eur confirms kang is not participating at Shockwave 2006  Thesaddestday 08:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denis Kang is not participating 

message: Made some changes but for some reason it removed most of the article despite the preview showing me something different then it gave me problems reverting Thesaddestday 09:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: Removed announced fights from the main paragraph to keep it neater and cleaner and stuck the references with the actual list of announced match-ups...  removed announced participants, with 1 (2 max) fights being added, and with pride doing the same thing they did with the real deal (announcing fighters then not using them) it is kind of unnecessary information Thesaddestday 09:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 
Talk:Royal Navy officer rank insignia

message: For the admiral of the fleet's epaulettes, see RN dress regulations of 1856: "Three stars within the crescent and one star on the strap, above it crossed batons surmounted by a crown."  Other regulations before 1891 read basically the same, though at some point they changed the wording to "small stars." J.T. Broderick (talk) 16:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, but where/how would I be able to see "RN dress regulations of 1856"? Pdfpdf (talk) 01:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It took me many years to accumulate that kind of reference material, but now there is a resource that makes it much easier: "Google Books Search". The dress regulations are usually appended near the end of the "Navy List" publications. The illustrated 1879 RN uniform regulations are also available there. Good luck! J.T. Broderick (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admiral of the fleet epaulettes 

message: CDRE1
The article says that a crown and sword & baton was worn by Cdre1. What sources state this specifically? And when did this practice cease?
At the time of its abolition - and I believe as far back as the 19th Century - Cdre1 had a crown and anchor with two stars on gold-backed shoulder-boards (but unlike Cdre2, ALL Cdre1 shoulder devices were the same, regardless of order of dress). I know the regulations of 1920 specify that ALL commodores, and captains over 3 years' on the captains' list, had the crown and anchor with two stars.
Yes this is true, when I first did this bit it was correct, but some idiot went and made it
wrong. (Now fixed) (130.88.202.219 (talk) 13:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cdre1, images, A/Sub-Lt, article layout 

message: As I have said in other articles, there is no such thing as OF(D). Midshipman in a commissioned OF1 rank and has been since ~2006. Look up any modern rank table in a JSP and you will see it listed alongside 2nd Lt and Pilot Officer. --Noofworm (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: STANAG 2116 seems an appropriate reference, if required. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that STANAG lists officer candidates as part of OF-1, however they are different as officer candidates are not yet full officers. See Turkish Astegmen and Spanish Alferez (army) for other ranks with the same situation. We should keep the distinction to show the difference.--Officer781 (talk) 06:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: OF(D)

message: Could we get the shoulder boards for Chaplains included here? They do hold the Queen's Commission and are saluted even if not technically holding a rank.JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaplains
Talk:Clipping path

message: Clipping Path is the selection outline made with the Pen Tool to extract a unit image from the rest of the pixels. 
Can any one tell me which one is popular, Clipping Path or the others?
Answer
Every process listed above are done basically by clipping path.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saiful 9999 (talk • contribs) 08:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

message: The "Adobe InDesign CS3 Site - Clipping Path" link in section 4 "External Links" points to the page "Archived Help Content". It should be updated to the CS5 page or the link should be removed. Bpg1968 (talk) 19:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 

message: I just tried making a clipping path from an unclosed path in Photoshop, and it was reflected in Indesign without issue. The clipping assumed the last two points had a straight line in between them delineating clipping area. I vote for removal of "closed" in the first sentence. If I don't hear objections within a few days, I'll make the change when I can. 04redsox07 (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Question of wording

message: MaryJsmith (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: We rarely link to tutorials – Thjarkur (talk) 12:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2020
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 8, 2006

message: If a cropped image must be used on the main page, could it at least be a bit bigger? At this size it means absolutely nothing even to people who can read music. I'm sure there are constraints I don't know about, but it'd be nice if it could be somewhat bigger. If there's somewhere else I should request this and you run across this comment, let me know where I should ask. Thanks, Mak (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Main page FA images can't be overly large - 100px wide is the usual (For pictures that are very wide and not very tall, I've gone as high as 130px wide). I agree that at that size, the image of the sheet music isn't particularly meaningful, but it's the best (read: most relavant) image in the article. I personally would prefer think it would make much more sense to have a painting (or picture) of the women singing, but there isn't one in the article. Raul654 21:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, fair enough, just thought I'd ask. I looked and looked for an image of the women, but haven't been able to find any for a number of reasons. Mak (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't Madrigal direct to Madrigal (music) instead?--Forlornandshorn 15:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I thought I had checked all those links before, but I guess not. Mak (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madrigal
Talk:What Is It?

message: Why is this article here?  It is almost a word for word copy of the section from the Crispin Glover page. 132.162.39.63 20:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The only reference cited for this article is a dead link. The text of the reference is as follows: "Glover's 'What Is It?' aptly describes film". The Salt Lake Tribune. July 2005. Retrieved 2007-02-23.
The same dead link is the only reference for Glover's other film (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Is_Fine!_Everything_Is_Fine.) (I'm sorry if there a better way to do that! Although I've technically been on Wikipedia for years, my edits have always been very mild-- mostly removing graffiti and fixing spelling errors. Currently reading up on how to properly contribute.) This may perhaps be indicative of creating pages for self-promotion, or to provide a negative slant on the films due to personal opinions.
I think it would be best to start from scratch, given that the information only linked to one article that cannot be viewed at this time. (Please help me to understand anything that I'm mistaken about!) There is a plethora of sources available for these articles, published by numerous reliable mass media resources, and I'm sure that whatever was true in them can be referenced according to guidelines. 
A possible conflict of interest may be present here, since I have interviewed Glover about his films. I'm also a fan of his work. I feel no desire whatsoever to use Wikipedia as a promotional tool for Glover or myself. For one thing, I'm not closely related to the project by any means, or to Glover for that matter. I understand why it would raise eyebrows for a fan to edit a page on a film, particularly if the page was originally written in a primarily negative tone. Neutrality is critical, after all. But my intention is to write a neutral article, and to not include any original research unless I can't find important information elsewhere, after undergoing the standard vetting processes for original research and tentative editors. 
Although the trilogy itself (including one upcoming film, "It Is Mine," which has published information on it as well as video footage from talk shows) is notable, I question whether or not they really need three separate articles, or two for that matter. Perhaps they should all be put into one article, "Films Directed by Crispin Glover" or "Crispin Glover's Film Trilogy" or something of that ilk. They're fairly interconnected, and in a way the form in which they're screened is the most notable thing about the films.
Rachel Knight (talk) 03:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only reference is a dead link