Talk:Shoe-fitting fluoroscope

message: I have reverted the article to a previous version because a large chunk of another copyright web page had been added. Also, by copying and pasting a page that included layout formatting, the resulting addition caused some text to overflow the right hand side of the window.
The article needs links to other pages rather than copies of them.
(Minician 17:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of copright material. 

message: Especially part that compared whole body exposure and foot exposure. At that dose (1 Gy/min) you would be a toast in under 5 minutes.  Fireice (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleared up a lot of confusion 

message: These things were gone before I was born, I think, so I have no first-hand knowledge.  The article suggests that the machines were only used for fitting children's shoes.  Is that right?
Uranographer (talk) 11:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting! I've made mention of this in the main article. Norman21 (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I had already included it in the regulatory timeline under 1967; maybe it doesn't belong there. It seems to meet the WP:IPC criteria.--Yannick (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I hadn't noticed that. I think the "new" location is better, but should the header be "In Popular Culture", as you have indicated? Norman21 (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have a strong preference. "In Popular Culture" is the most common section heading in other articles, but not always and not required. The WP:IPC guideline suggests spinoff article titles of "X in popular culture", "Cultural references to X", "Cultural depictions of X", or "X in fiction". I picked "Fictional depiction" because the Billion Dollar Brain is no longer all that popular, and I doubt we're going to find any fiction books, songs, or statues that would justify the broader terms. I just didn't want to leave a "Miscellany" heading, because experience says that's just asking for cruft.--Yannick (talk) 15:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children only? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Shoe-fitting fluoroscope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://staff.tamhigh.org/lapp/xray.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article had a template on it (since July 2009!), stating that "This article is written about the US-based Adrian fluoroscope, it should be edited to cover a broader number of manufacturer". It is debateable if that was true even then; it certainly isn't applicable now, so I have deleted it. I trust everyone is OK with that, Swanny18 (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: What was the radioactive source in these devices? And what was done with them at the end of their working lives? Seems like decommissioning would be worth a mention if reliably source information can be found. --Danimations (talk) 04:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radioactive source? Decommissioning? 

message: From The National Museum of Health for Olympics 99.19.86.216 (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Results of tools An equipment established