Talk:University of Muri

message: BenGL, as you can see, I took your references and inserted them on the main article page. I also removed, therefore, the "unreferenced" tag. But what I did was really just build the reference section skeleton, with the places where each reference you mention must go. We still need to work on the book quoting in each reference, to bring it up to quoting standards. I have the publishing details of each of the books you mention at home, so I will still bring the three references now up to quoting standards for books and pages. Thanks, warshy 16:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: - Warshy, of course it does. We are talking about a fictional university. It is very arrogant to simply delete things without explanation.
I've read the supposed "sources" now more carefully, and I have listened to the entire theatrical reprsentation of the supposed "Hannah Arendt" lecture on Jewish identity and the "Jewish Question," on Palestine and on the state of Israel. The whole thing seems to me to be an attempt at changing political perceptions through fictional/mock representations. Since changing the political realities of the Middle East by conventional means does not seem to be working, or to really have any chance of working in the near future, apparently some people are trying to do it by other supposed "fictional" means. Now these people have found this little handle here on wiki, which I, following my interest in Scholem's historical studies apparently helped shape and make it perhaps "notable" by last editing in April 13, 2007, and they want to use it to spread and advertise their political enterprise. What can I say? This article to begin with is just a little stub, baretly notable by wiki standards, except that there are historical sources referring to it, which I myself helped establish and expand. Who in the whole wide worls pays attention to this little forgotten, really unnotable stub of a wiki article. The only reason I ended up paying attention is becaause I once edited and contributed reliable sources to it, so it remained there in my 'watchlist' unnoticed, half forgotten, for almost 5 years or so. And now, some unsigned and unidentified 'agents' want to claim on wiki that it was "apparently" revived (on an encyclopedia, mind you). But what do I care? You want to use it as I tried to describe above? Go ahead, be my guest. For the record, I completely support the Palestinian struggle for their own human rights, on a par with the rights claimed by Jews in Palestine/Israel. I just hope they can sometime coexist together in some form, instead of just killing each other forever, even though it may not be finally possible in reality. As for Scholem, he must be surely "spinning in his grave" by this uninteded use of his "invention." But again, dead people do not have any control over the possible future use of their "ideas," and Scholem himself had, in my view, some very wrong other historical ideas (about which this is certainy not the proper place to argue). warshytalk 18:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revival

message: Pinging everyone who contributed to the AfD discussion: , , , . Does anyone object to converting this page to a redirect to Gershom Scholem? Alduin2000 (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I am fine with that. This wasn't a good close, no keep votes yet closed as no consensus. Ugh. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

text: The AFD has a consensus that this should not be an article. I agree to a redirect. Jontesta (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Given nobody has raised any concerns, I'm going to go ahead and redirect the page. Alduin2000 (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect