Talk:Porsche Cayenne

message: Several sections of this article are written as though they were an advertisement (i'm not sure how to put up the box saying so), most notably the silly "performance" section.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.88.97.52 (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?

message: The "Controversy" section was an unsourced, POV soapbox.  The points made are trivial and opinionated.  The opinion blurbs are unreferenced.  The "Popular Culture" also was deleted.  The use of cars in movies and by celebrities is so trivial that it's a waste of space. J M Rice (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up 

message: The Cayenne Turbo text quoted below is copied by user Autostream from Edmunds.com without citation.
  
Atop the range sits the Cayenne Turbo. Apart from the two turbochargers (one per bank) and a lowered compression ratio of 10.5:1, the 4.8-liter V8 is similar to that of the Cayenne S except for an output of 500 hp (370 kW) and 516 ft·lbf (700 N·m) of torque. Porsche's height-adjustable air suspension and PASM adaptive damping are standard, along with fancier instruments, bigger brakes, bigger wheels, navigation/communication system, Servotronic steering, 12-channel parking radar, and a center locking differential w/optional rear locker.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=119520  —Preceding 
Several other sections added by this user appear to be from the same Edmunds article.
unsigned comment added by Springee (talk • contribs) 01:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violations on this page 

message: The article lacks impartiality, from start to finish.  Much of the writing seems highly biased in favor of the vehicle, and much of the writing seems conjectural.  The tone of the article is completely off-base for a reference article.  Notably, the article completely avoids the very real co-development of the Cayenne with the VW Taureg. 842U (talk) 04:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising Tone

message: The only Porsche car that doesn't look like a Porsche  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.164.229.33 (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno. To me it looks an awful lot like the Porsche Cayenne.-→ JJOlsen 00:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   doesn't look like Porsche 

message: Just a small question. How much (US$) does the Cayenne Turbo S cost for purchase? JMBZ-12 (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cayenne Turbo S Price 

message: The image with the caption "Electronic Stabilizer dcoupling demonstrating extra wheel articulation." seems poorly chosen. Wheel articulation is the ability to keep all 4 wheels on the ground, which the porsche is clearly not doing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.151.185 (talk) 06:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheel Articulation? 

message: I heard from a friend in the car industry that the Cayenne is not really "Porsche" e.g. they are outsourcing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.157.231 (talk) 06:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it really made by them? 

message: The article says: "The 2011 Porsche Cayenne is visually shorter and smaller than its predecessors". This sounds like POV, as the dimensions are all bigger. Am not sure if we can base "visually" on facts while facts disagree with it... Vincent Lextrait (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visually shorter and smaller? 

message: Can anyone find out why the Cayenne has no rating on either http://www.iihs.org , http://www.euroncap.com , or www.safercar.gov ? Or where to find such safety approval documentation? Although not tested in the USA , it must have been tested somewhere? TGCP (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety - no documentation 

message: Cayenne is almost fully assembled in Bratislava. Including interior. What is missing is the engine which is fitted in Leipzig.
B00c (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's done in Bratislava and what in Leipzig 

message: From the third gen section:
"On September 6, 2019 a late-model Porsche Cayenne drove at high speed onto a crowded sidewalk in the Mitte district of Berlin, Germany, killing four people, include a 3- to 4-year-old child."
What relevance, if any, does this have to the article? While this is an unspeakable tragedy to be sure, I'm not sure there is any reason to reference it in this article, especially in the opening of the third generation section. BigBadWaffl3z (talk) 13:53, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitte district disaster?