lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Microsoft Messenger service

message: Since 2004 there are great many discussion on the net about errors come across by users when they try to connect to the MSN Messenger. Part of these are caused by faults in user network setting and others, it is said, caused by the pause of .NET Messenger Service. 
I have been using MSN for a long time. Until recently I encountered such problem. I tried to check the .NET Messenger Service status whenever I cannot logon to the MSN, but every time I try, I receive a "No page to display" error. 
Can anyone tell me under normal condition what the status page should look like?
BuringDragon 09:36, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a link to that page? Maybe your client has an outdated (broken) link. I saw many wrong links in the help topics of windows live messenger (pointing to help.live.com, but talking about something else) --216.244.213.251 20:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Service status

message: I read that while editing the third-party clients section. It's weird. I couldn't find anything about the license, so I commented out the "gpl" part. Anyone knows why it was there? --216.244.232.6 20:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meetro (Multi-platform, GPL & Proprietary) 

message: Does any else find it interesting and perhaps relevant to the article to notice the major Canadian demographic of MSN? Similar to how many netizens from the US use AIM in the same way. 24.82.167.240 00:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics

message: SALUT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chakis (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  allo
Talk:Who Will Save Your Soul

message: "On 2004, Jessica Simpson invited Jewel to sing "Who Will Save Your Soul" as a duet with her on the Nick & Jessica's Variety Show Special. Both gave an outstanding performance, filled with amazing vocals."
Sounds a little POV to me. Pumpkingrrl 21:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jessica Simpson duet

message: The main article states: "It incorporates unique vocal key changes and is a classic example of her honest lyrics and raw voice." If I remember correctly, the song is the same key throughout. Can someone confirm? 156.56.200.15 02:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocal Key Changes? 

message: A few years ago, I saw a comedy segment in which some poor guy was subjected to listening to this song over and over again. Can somebody tell me what was the name of it? Yellowstone County Girl 02:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a faint memory of that sketch, and I am almost certain it was a Saturday Night Live bit. 141.155.134.184 (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About this song?
Talk:J. C. Tran

message: What is his relation to An Tran and Kenny Tran? Mobile mundo (talk) 18:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to other Trans 
Talk:Tower of Babel (1989 video game)

message: What the heck does Towers of Hanoi have to do with Tower Of Babel, except for the name? Why don't we add "The Two Towers" and the Tower Bridge while we're at it? JIP | Talk 09:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Towering

message: Is there an English Wikipedia entry for the Namco game of the same name (ja:バベルの塔 (ゲーム))? -- Myria (talk) 06:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At this time, there does not appear to be one, but feel free to check out the guide created at StrategyWiki: Babel no Tou. Plotor (talk) 01:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namco game? 

message: This was lately edited to the article: 
I was the one who originally wrote "over literally hundreds". I take specific care not to misuse the word "literally" to mean its exact opposite, instead if I write "literally", then it's true. The game itself offers about 126 or 137 towers (I don't remember the exact number any more, it's been well over a decade since I played it), and the included construction kit allows the player to construct much more. The option of whether to place a floor tile somewhere alone offers 2^{256} different possible towers, all of which can be constructed. Putting objects on the floor tiles raises this number greatly. I understand the original phrase "over literally hundreds" might sound like exaggerating, but replacing it with "several" makes it sound like there's only a couple of different towers available, which is a vast understatement. JIP | Talk 21:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Mario Latzig's remake (www.tower-of-babel.info) which seems to have all the levels, there are 117 in the game, if that helps any. 79.68.110.62 (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are 117 official towers in the game, but there is nothing stopping the player from creating hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands more. I myself must have created almost three hundred. JIP | Talk 21:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hundreds of levels 

message: The article says there are currently two remakes under development, but I'm not sure how best to reword it.
Of the two remakes, the one at www.tower-of-babel.info is listed by its author as not under current development, though an incomplete build is available for Windows only. The site is still active, just that development is not due to personal issues and lack of time.
Meanwhile, the remake/sequel originally at www.tob2.com is defunct; the site is no longer available except through the Internet Archive, and even that's incomplete.
I'm not sure whether it would be better to simply remove the tob2 reference and just leave the other as a 'it's still available' note or to even remove them entirely. I, sadly, am not the type for WP:BOLD.
- 79.68.110.62 (talk) 21:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remakes
Talk:Stanton Samenow

message: I am attempting to contact Dr. Samenow about using his image on this page.  Hopefully I can get some open lines of communication going and whip this article into some shape. Zab 10:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs some citations or some sort. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.239.87.84 (talk) 03:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Article Needs Attention 

message: This article reads like an advertisement or promotional fan page for Stanton Samenow.  It is badly in need of some objectivity and balance.  As it stands now it is unencyclopedic.  Shanoman (talk) 03:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mega-POV! 

message: This request has been copied here by Toddst1 from User talk:Ssamenow so that it can be addressed in the proper venue.  Toddst1 (talk) 06:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no comment on the identity or neutrality of the anonymous IP editor who added that material, but I've removed most of it as poorly sourced, WP:COATRACK and WP:EXCEPTIONAL.  I've also removed a lot of the objected-to material that appeared promotional.  Toddst1 (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to eliminate Samenow controversy section. 

message: The subject of this article was notable enough to receive a laudatory obituary in the Washington Post, which states that his 3-volume work The Criminal Personality was considered a seminal work in the field of criminology -- an opinion that I've previously seen in other publications. I will attempt to add some content along those lines to this article in the near future. Ps8v9 (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:National Lampoon's Senior Trip

message: 14 years earlier, a made-for-TV movie was shown on CBS with the title Senior Trip. See here. I remember seeing parts of it, therefore the redirect to this title, should be removed. ----DanTD (talk) 23:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects should be removed 

message: I' m fairly new to making edits on Wiki, however this movie holds a special place in my heart and I added a few lines noting Tara Strong played Carla. I think that part is probably fine, Im curious as to appropriateness of having included the sentence listing four of her most well known rolls, and the shows they were on. I guess I'm asking for the opinion of someone who may have a better feel for editing in general  , I'd appreciate it as I think I've spent more time considering this (after the edit) than will ever be spent reading the post by other people ever. Thanks Benmcla0177 (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  F.N.G. Post,
Category talk:Australian murderers

message: There is some concern about the categorisation of people as murderers and criminals.  The concern has been raised at Talk:Maxwell Stuart.  I have suggested that given Stuart was convicted, had unsuccessfully appealed, the verdict had been reviewed by a Royal Commission and upheld, to fail to categorise him as a murderer seemed to be POV, rather than the other way around.  It is not the Wikipedia's role to unconvict someone - the issue is to report the facts.  To categorise someone as a murderer, Wikipedia:Verifiability is met by reference to court decisions and, in the Stuart case, the report of the Royal Commission.  As the issue perhaps was with the category label, the discussion has been referred to category discussion pages and a discussion has been initiated at Category talk:Murderers.  The label descriptor for this category states: "Australians who have been convicted of murder." - in Australia the legal system is the arbiter.--A  Y  Arktos 10:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation of murderers
Talk:Overnight Delivery

message: The information about Kevin Smith and his re-write is verified by a link to his website, and there is no reason it should be removed.
--CJ 11:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The trivia is non-notable and quotes belong on Wikiquote.  I see no reason why we should be giving undue weight to this non-encyclopedic content here.  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Are you kidding? Kevin Smith is one of the most well-known indy directors of our time, and it's very relevant that he wrote a script for a little seen movie featuring Reese Witherspoon (who was subsequently rude about Smith). So unless you're a hardcore Reese Witherspoon fan (or possibly a Kevin Smith fan, miffed at Reese's insult) I see no reason why you would want this removed. And BTW, there is plenty of actual, non-encyclopedic junk on Wiki which deserves far more attention than this.
Thanks. --CJ 11:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: No, not kidding, and yes I am aware of who Kevin Smith is.  ;-)  Like I said, giving such prominence to this off-hand conversation gives undue weight to what amounts to trivia.  Register with Wikiquote and then place a  link within the article here.  Just my suggestion.  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Don't Remove Trivia Section Anymore!

message: I made this update and wanted to explain and centralize all feedback.  I cleaned up the summary, looking at the 27 Dresses entry for "romantic comedy film" and Frida for how to handle uncredited writers.  Then I added the plot header and changed the voice of the plot description (no more "It's about").  Finally I removed the details of Kevin Smith's grudge against Reese Witherspoon, leaving a mention of it and a link to Smith's detailed account of it. Blakecarlile (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive cleanup
Talk:Notre Dame de Lorette

message: The links to the French page and vice versa are wrong (the French page church is in Paris)--Grahamec 08:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 
Talk:Brotherhood

message: Then none was for a party; 
Then all were for the state; 
Then the great man helped the poor, 
And the poor man loved the great: 
Then lands were fairly portioned; 
Then spoils were fairly sold: 
The Romans were like brothers 
In the brave days of old.
written, dicovered,& experimented by:
       JUSTINE JOY T. LANTAJO
       TACLOBAN CITY
    
       LEYTE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
       II- YAKAL
Wat a rubbish iz dis i'm finding somethin else & opening iz somethin else  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.135.13.66 (talk) 13:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-20/Wikimedia UK

message: All looks OK to me. We are, of course, not doing any big announcements until we have charitable status, which takes somewhere between now and whenever - David Gerard 10:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The chapter was incorporated under the legal name of Wiki Educational Resources Limited on Tuesday, 14 February. While incorporation means that it has legal status as a Company, it is seeking Charitable status and will shortly be applying to register as a charity. If this is successful tax deductions may be available for donations to the chapter. As an independent organisation from the Foundation, and subject to UK law, it will use its resources on specific projects as well as supporting the work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
--AlisonW 22:08, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Stingmon

message: Whis is the "official" digivolution? Or is both real - Plau
* JewelBeemon is considered to be Stingmon's "natural digivolved form" while Dinobeemon is a form Stingmon obtains with help from Exveemon.
*JewelBeemon evolves from Stingmon in cards, thats his connection with Stingmon, nothing more. The D3 confirmed DinoBeemon and GranKuwagamon to be Stingmon's Ultimate and Mega forms, also Digimon Digital Card Battle stated that GranKuwagamon is Wormmon's (Ken's Wormmon, Ken along with several other DigiDestined appeared in the game) Mega form. Nightmare_SE
so the natural evo line SHOULD be like this
* Fresh - Leafmon
* In-Training - Minomon
* Rookie - Wormmon
* Champion - Stingmon
* Ultimate - JewelBeemon
* Mega - GranKuwagamon 
--Lil' Red Lightning 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course not, JewelBeemon only exists in cards, and in cards he evolves from multiple Digimon, and I can't even find a source that states he can even evolve to GranKuwagamon, Stingmon's evolution line should be
* Fresh - Leafmon
* In-Training - Minomon
* Rookie - Wormmon
* Champion - Stingmon
* Ultimate - N/A
* Mega - N/A
or 
* Fresh - Leafmon
* In-Training - Minomon
* Rookie - Wormmon
* Champion - Stingmon
* Ultimate - DinoBeemon
* Mega - GranKuwagamon
Nightmare SE 02:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Jewel Beemon is a possible evolution for Stingmon, but Ken's Stingmon, had he evolved in the series, would have evolved into Dino Beemon and then Gran Kuwagamon, not Jewel Beemon -- even without jogress. The jogress forms turn out to be just as "natural" as any other evolution, in spite of the combination of parts you have with Paildramon/Dino Beemon and Silphymon. Stingmon can evolve without jogress to Dino Beemon, XV-mon can evolve without jogress to Paildramon. Yes, I know it doesn't make that much sense. Shining Celebi 03:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jewelbeemon]] VS [[Dinobeemon]]
Talk:South Seas Detachment

message: I have removed the following section from this entry. As the South Seas Detachment was only brigade sized it is extremely unlikely that the Japanese intended to use it to invade Australia. Other statements attributed to Kenosuke Sato in other entries are clearly inaccurate, and this appears to also be the case for the following paragraph. --Nick Dowling 10:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: South Seas Detachment in the Japanese invasion of Australia

message: Much of the text appears to be copied verbatim from Hayashi's Kogun book.  I'll try to rewrite some of it in the immediate future to avoid the appearance of plagerism. Cla68 (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagerism

message: There is some confusion in the terminology used herein and by uses in other pages with interconnected links.
Bullard (see p iii) uses South Seas Force for the army formation and describes the South Seas Fleet as being based around the 4th Fleet (IJN). Herein, these are correspondingly referred to as the South Seas Detachment and the South Seas Force. There is an obvios ambiguity when the different terminologies are used in pages with interconnected links. I would suggest a preference for Bullard and amendments to address and explain. Comments please. 
*{cite book |last=Bullard |first=Steven (translator) |title=Japanese army operations in the South Pacific Area New Britain and Papua campaigns, 1942–43 |publisher=Australian War Memorial| year=2007 |location=Canberra |url=http://ajrp.awm.gov.au/ajrp/ajrp2.nsf/088031725e4569e4ca256f4f00126373/1fcb61d633972daaca257291000abf44?OpenDocument |isbn=978-0-9751904-8-7|ref=harv}
Cinderella157 (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology/South Seas Detachment/South Seas Force/South Seas Fleet/4th Fleet (IJN)
Template talk:Tip of the day/archive 01

message: While the <nowiki> tags at Template:totd don't show up, and are sometimes necessary, they show up in places like Wikipedia:Main Page, which use tables. Currently, the wiki software doesn't always parse things like <nowiki> tags correctly when they're in tables. What should be done? – Minh Nguyen 03:46, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Eloquence found a temporary fix using HTML entities: ˜ - created by "˜". However this doesn't look quite right (in my Mozilla browser), and also cannot be copied and used into an edit window. I replaced them with another dirty fix which is to separate the tildas with empty HTML comments: "". --Mihai 04:10, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: &lt;nowiki> tags

message: I find it shocking that the tip of the day is encouraging creation of interwiki redirects.  As if that wasn't bad enough, it doesn't encourage listing them at Wikipedia:List of interwiki redirects, so they can be kept track of.  Interwiki redirects have a problem of not showing up on "what links here" pages, thus can be lost and are hard to locate when they need to be edited.  Additionally, encouraging moving content to Wiktionary without following the m:transwiki system causes the record of the authors of an article to be lost, possibly violating the terms of the GFDL. Gentgeen 17:14, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Tip of the day encouraging interwiki redirects?

message: The tip is updated so infrequently that it should be called tip of the week. Maybe Tip of the Fortnight.
:I can create a queue for tips like I've already done for Selected anniversaries and for Wikipedia:Today's featured article. For now, I could create a tip of the week queue by using the  variable. When we get enough tips, I can create a 366 page queue. --mav 03:27, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It'd be nice to have this handle itself like that. I remember getting a lot of benefit out of tip of the day back when I was new. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:24, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be a good idea. Maybe you should have a place in your userspace for ideas. HereToHelp 00:54, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tip of the Week?
Talk:Abura-sumashi

message: So I tried to find anything on the Internet (that, you know, wasn't already referencing this article) about Abura-sumashi, and considering that Google Books only had 7 entries with the term (none of which were older than 2009 and 3 of which only cite Wiki as their source) I am curious to know if this is really is Japanese folklore subject or should belong in some anime category? Duende-Poetry (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: When Are Subjects in Folklore Not Actually Folklore?

message: Can whoever asserted that that is the critter's true name provide a reference? Even the Kaī-Yōkai Denshō Database which seems to be relatively free of Mizuki/Sekien influence only brings up a result for "sumashi". Kotengu 21:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aburazumashi?
Talk:Board of County Commissioners (New Jersey)

message: The page Freeholder is very similar to this page and contributes no new information. Therefore, I think the two should be merged. 02:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Article does not mention that New Jersey was a Freeholder state that was the last Northern state to allow the enslavement of black Africans and African-Americans within its boundaries. --172.58.184.231 (talk) 17:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Educational research

message: Having had first-hand experience with basic, applied, academic and commissioned research, I can with high confidence state that this claim is completely inaccurate: "Applied researchers are commissioned by a sponsor and are responsible for addressing the needs presented by their employer.[2]" 
Sure, it is supported by a citation from 24 years ago, but this is not how educational research is done in practice. There are tons of examples of academic research projects regarding what are clearly applied research, such as developing a digital learning game, and commissioned resarch on surveying the presence of school resources.  Sda030 (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applied research is not commissioned research (nor vice versa)
Talk:TES (magazine)

message: TES is now owned by Providence Equity Partners
https://www.tes.com/tesglobal/articles/tes-announces-new-owners  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.98.18.122 (talk) 14:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in ownership

message: The Times Educational Supplement is now known simply as the TES - could the page's title be updated to reflect this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fidgetpentop (talk • contribs) 10:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in name

message: I have undone an edit made by an anonymous user which made an allegation TES was "publishing factually incorrect articles to boost readership". As this named the author I take it Biograhpy of Living Persons policy applies. 
ChapterandVerse (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced allegation 

message: The version 14:06, 15 October 2010 132.185.144.120 of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: Article Alexander Falconer Murison says "he was editor of the Educational Times (now the Times Educational Supplement)" from 1902 to 1912.  If this previous name is valid, then some other articles could link here: Probability, College of Teachers, Automedian triangle. However, it may be that they are referring to some other publication (USA/ French?). Any thoughts on the content/phrasing of Alexander Falconer Murison ? Melcombe (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous name? 

message: Is it 'tez', 'tess', or 'tee-ee-ess'? The article should say at the beginning. Ralph Corderoy (talk) 06:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to pronounce