Talk:Stanton T. Friedman

message: This is a fairly well written article, but IMHO it is strongly bias in favor of Mr. Friedman and his ideas. I think the addition of some criticisms or rebuttals of his work/theories would improve it. Alas, I am not knowledgeable enough in this field to undertake such an endeavour.
--Careax 08:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By the same token, how would either of you know if the Poster is essentially right or wrong?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.130.32 (talk) 19:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?

message: :WTF is "ETH"???
--Larean01 13:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment added with signature and time stamp to facilitate archiving. - - MrBill3 (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ETH

message: There are several comments here which sure seem in my eyes to be "digs," like the gratuitous comments in regards to Friedman's background as a nuclear physicist. I'm going to do a bit of a clean-up here, so if there areCanada Jack 18:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page clean-up

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 07:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I work at the CBC and I thought he in fact had been a contributor, though not on the UFO side of things. Could be wrong. His daughter does work for us, I believe. I've looked at the article and cleaned up some glaring POV statements, reworded or omitted them, clarified the point about the Majestic 12 documents (they are not only doubted by skeptics of UFOs, but some of the leading Roswell researchers as well), and took out the rather odd note about him suing those who slandered him. (Not sure of the relevance of that.) Canada Jack (talk) 17:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations & references

message: I removed the POV tag as there is no apparent reason for it being there now given talk here. Let me know if you disagree with this position, with explanation. Cheers Holon (talk) 23:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I removed the following from the article:
:- a technology, referred to in the French COMETA report, that may be feasible in the near future. The COMETA report claims about magnetohydrodynamic propulsion are based on the scientific works of Jean-Pierre Petit.http://www.mhdprospects.com/  It is also currently being investigated by aeronautical engineer Leik Myrabo. MHD propulsion can only explain the shock wave annihilation  and the halo that is often seen in ufo sightings. MHD propulsion, while suitable for interplanetary (or intrasolar system) travel, cannot accommodate intersolar system (or intragalactic travel) due to the extreme distances separating stellar systems at Earth's distance from the center of the Milky Way galaxy. Distances between galaxies are far greater than those between stars and so intergalactic travel is far more unlikely. 
This text, as fascinating as it may be, belongs (if not already there; I've not looked) in the article magnetohydrodynamic propulsion; in this article it is totally off-point. (We have wikilinks for exactly this purpose.) -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 20:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of MHD propulsion text from article. 

message: I removed the following two sections from the article.  Per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is a directory or guide. We don't include lists of interviews in biographies of notable people. Period.
-- John Broughton   (♫♫) 21:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of interviews 

message: I removed this, because it wasn't clearly connected to the article:
*
My guess is that there is a lot of useful information in the book, but I doubt that the majority of it is about Friedman, so it doesn't belong in a "Further reading" section until/unless specific chapters actually do pertain to Friedman. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 21:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good source? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Stanton T. Friedman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121017081214/http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=798566834341088233 to http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=798566834341088233
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090228230506/http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=703985870906635810 to http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=703985870906635810
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In Personal life, it says he's been married twice but has a daughter with this third wife. So is this his second wife or has he been married 3 times?  Danpetitpas (talk) 06:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wives? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Stanton T. Friedman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/story.html?id=dd7048f8-9648-4cc0-8135-27d5ec8c7b9b
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225101354/http://www.life-union.com/5/stantonfriedman/cds.htm to http://www.life-union.com/5/stantonfriedman/cds.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified