lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International Ultraviolet Explorer

message: Is this satellite still orbiting? DarthVader 07:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Useful resources that I am planning to use to expand this article.
History:
*http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/history.html
*http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/gallery/prelaunch.html
*http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/sir-robert-wilson-643586.html
*http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/aag/AAG_Feb03/aag_44134.htm
*http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976MmSAI..47..431M
*http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=31315  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.34.136 (talk) 19:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 

message: This article needs some illustrating.  Would someone feel like uploading some of these NASA images:
http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/images/bigiue.png
http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/gallery/
90.199.34.136 (talk) 19:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need to edit war, there needs to be a discussion here, and we need to reach consensus as to what content is right. Puffin Let's talk! 10:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/William Bradford (professor)

message: I don't know how closely you've been following the discussion since putting the William Bradford (professor) article up for AfD, but I'm concerned that there may be some funky things going on with the discussion and the related articles. I think there may even be a possibility that Bradford himself is sockpuppeting the discussion in order to get the article deleted. Part of the Bradford controversy, which has been removed from the current article, is that he was accused of sockpuppeting on the college's student blog. I've been practicing AGF on the AfD and responding as if these are real individuals, but these are the accounts and IPs in the AfD that I am suspicious of:
*Special:Contributions/Jonswift
*Special:Contributions/24.250.202.104 [Cox communications, Atlanta (not necessarily located there) TedTalk/Contributions 21:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also suspicious of the new voter, Special:Contributions/207.67.145.159. --Groggy Dice 22:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACambridgeBayWeather&diff=65336000&oldid=65264028 talk page]
Talk:Restructured steak

message: Seems to be directly lifted from here: http://experts.about.com/e/r/re/Restructured_steak.htm
Jhnphm 07:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure the about.com article wasn't lifted from Wikipedia? --FOo 03:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was, look at the bottom of the about.com page.  23:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: To clarify, the about.com page is actually from Wikipedia. This is not a copyright violation. —Centrx→talk • 03:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ohsumi (satellite)

message: Is this satellite still in orbit? DarthVader 07:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although a bit late. No, it is no longer in orbit. It decayed on August 2, 2003. This information is now also placed in the article. Van der Hoorn (talk) 22:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Music instrument technology

message: I started this in order to have something to link to from a relevant sentence in the lead of Music of Italy. I'm not sure if it's a good idea. Jeffmatt 07:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Wart-biter

message: I don't care what it says on the Arkive page - even though its cited, its wrong.  The English common name comes from the ancient english tradition of using the crickets to remove warts.  Do you really think we'd give a common name to one of our insects centuries ago based on what the Swedes did with it?  It was a common practice across Europe, not specifically Swedish. 86.137.136.196 08:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of the Somme (disambiguation)

message: There is a tune for bagpipes called “Battle of the Somme”.  It is referenced in George MacDonald Fraser’s The General Danced at Dawn (1970).
The relevant quotation appears on-line in The Queen's Commission: A Junior Officer's Guide (referenced today), near the bottom of p. 115, but I have been unable to discover the meaning or significance of ‘See’s the key, or I’ll roar up yer lobby’.
--Nat (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bagpipe music
Talk:Shuidiao Getou

message: I was wondering what made this ci have an entry of its own. It seems that it's more due to the fact that it appeared as the lyrics of one of Faye Wong's song - Liuyao
Try this reason: It is one of the most famous Chinese poems ever. And it was first sung by Teresa Teng, who is many times more famous and renowned than Faye Wong. Robin Chen 22:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support. Nothing is lost by stripping away the tones in the title itself. It isn't as if pinyin were an original script for Mandarin. It is a Romanisation, and many Chinese themselves use toneless pinyin – if they use pinyin at all. NoeticaTea? 07:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hi. The unreferenced translation provided in the table could be completed (in a third column) or replaced by the English translation from Qiu Xiaolong. What you you think? --R-C-R-J-- (talk) 12:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translation of Su Shi's poem
Talk:Moro conflict

message: Can it be re-categorized as a frozen conflict? Not all Moros really want to stay as part of the Philippines due to the conflict. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 04:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frozen conflict 

message: Is the conflict really over? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's defintiely not over. 66,000 people just have fled their homes a few weeks ago because of this ongoing armed conflict. 79.196.244.159 (talk) 15:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Jim Michael (talk) 15:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the root of our difficulty here lies in characterizing this as a single contiguous conflict. Given there are multiple actors (the MIM, the BMLO, the MNLF, the MILF, and later groups) we should characterize this as a series of closely related conflicts, rather than just one. That way we can have a clear ending: when there are no more splinter groups in conflict with the Philippine Government. The MNLF conflict, the MILF conflict, and so on, can and should have their respective sub-articles. - MistahPeemayer (talk) 04:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...was an insurgency? 

message: It is not clear enough in this article how exactly the conflict relates to the ARMM, BARMM, and the Bangsamoro Peace Process.  While I agree that conflict still continues, it is important to also note instances where major steps towards the end of certain parts of the conflict. - MistahPeemayer (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  BARMM, ARMM, and Bangsamoro Peace Process 

message: I request that the older parts of this discussion be archived (except maybe retain sections with community decisions). The page is too long for easy navigation, and it is sometimes confusing because the older parts are discussing old versions of the article that have since changed significantly. Respectfully, MistahPeemayer (talk) 17:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This talk page should have archives
Talk:Clan Wolf

message: I have changed the image of the page to one that is similar in format to Clan Snow Raven. The old image only has a Clan Jade Falcon version since it was created for the computer game Mechwarrior 2. If you think this image is better then the original can be deleted and if you think these images are better, the rest can be found at the history of the clans page  (I'm not the author of this page so there's no vanity with using these images over others). -- Smoore 500 08:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tnx for the image, I think we have room for both images :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  14:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell

message: When I first saw this,I thought this was awful,not helped by very muddy looking VHS Copy.Seen much better prints now,and I'd say the films a good swansong for Cushing and fisher's gothic world.Actually feel sorry for the Baron by the end... 2A02:C7D:EC08:7A00:398B:B1C7:A760:F32E (talk) 16:17, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frankenstein and the monster from hell
Talk:Street poster art

message: the last sentence of this seems to be opinion not fact. 150.176.64.163 (talk) 13:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:One Piece manga (English version)

message: This page is work in progress.  Bare with me its gonna take a few days to sort out! Angel Emfrbl 08:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in prgress

message: Doesn't anyone have the release dates for the US??? Angel Emfrbl 08:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: US releases?
Talk:Uhuru (satellite)

message: Is this satellite still in orbit? DarthVader 08:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. PlanetCare (talk) 17:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: An editor recently changed "SAS 1" to "SAS A".  It was and is common practice for NASA to change the names of missions when they are successfully launched.  (Other examples:  OSO H -> OSO 7; HEAO A -> HEAO 1; HEAO C -> HEAO 3; LST -> Hubble Space Telescope; SIRTF -> Spitzer Space Telescope, etc.)  This was done with all three Small Astronomy Satellites, although SAS 1 is much more commonly known as "Uhuru" than either SAS 1 or Explorer 43.  (These series names are often hypehnated, eg SAS-1.  In the missions I know personally, OSO 7, HEAO 1 and HEAO 3, we have tended to standardize on the unhyphenated form, but both are common.)  It is reasonable to note common alternate names as a clarification, but the earlier, less-common names should not be perpetuated needlessly.  Thanks Wwheaton (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The theory that the mission was renamed after launch is not borne out by the references, which tend to indiscriminately use either designation. The only name change I can see is that to "Uhuru".  We certainly can list both,but I don't see a good reason to pick one or the other. Mangoe (talk) 02:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

text: I think you meant 42.  "NASA Explorer 42"  PlanetCare (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission names
Talk:List of One Piece music

message: I was wondering, should the FUNi dub Song's Numbering be changed, or at least a Note added?
With Confirmation that they are going to Start their DVD release at Season 1, and their Constant saying at cons and in interviews that in all DVDs that they plan on showing everything As-is (with Dubbed Openings and Endings) To The Light will no longer be the First Opening, We Are by Jerry Jewel soon will, and then a Yet unheard Believe will be the 2nd, And The Ending theme List should also match the Japanese one.
Should the Numbering Be Changed?  We Are Added?  I believe there should AT LEAST be a Note along with the Note about the Ending themes going away and such that "Numbering will change if FUNi keeps We Are And Believe for the DVDs"
DemonRin 00:13, 09 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FUNi Song Numbering

message: Bare with me here, I am working on this page and it will take a few days to bring it up to Wikipedia's standards.  Angel Emfrbl 08:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in progress

message: I know there are more One Piece related music stuff then this.  I have one of the CDs called 'Carnival' and I'll add that info here tomarrow.  But we need to find out the remaining songs, there are various image songs and all sorts out there. Angel Emfrbl 12:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try here. It's great for all One Piece music info. Murasaki Seiko 13:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That link leds to nowhere.  Angel Emfrbl 11:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, that link should work... XD Murasaki Seiko 21:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Music list is imcomplete

message: Does One Piece not have any OSTs? I find it odd. --Zeno McDohl (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OSTs 

message: It says here that they made a fourth revision of the rap with Robin included, that played from episode 105 onwards. But according to the article on the One Piece dub, production stopped at episode 104. Is there any proof of the Robin version? If it hasn't actually aired yet, I'd take it out for the time being. Hopefully whoever picks the series up will use another theme tune instead. Darien Shields 20:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth Rap?
Talk:UoSAT-12

message: Is this satellite still in orbit of Earth? DarthVader 08:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. DarthVader 13:23, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Dude (Looks Like a Lady)

message: I started this article, but it needs work on information about the recording of the song, its meaning, its origin, etc. - KB 08:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work. 

message: I was listening to an old Paul Revere & the Raiders album and heard the song "Powder Blue Mercedes Queen" with the lyrics "Do it like a lady! Chew it like lady!" which reminded me more than a little of this song's refrain...
 Gr8white (talk) 23:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidence? 

message: There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects this page, suggesting that the capitalization of "like" should be removed. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 14:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy discussion in progress
Talk:Ashanti–Fante War

message: Several of the dates are incorrect. The page skips over the 1863 Anglo Asante war FOAM543678 (talk) 23:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, wasn’t McCarthy shot? I might be wrong about this thou FOAM543678 (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates and errors
Talk:Gran Colombia–Peru War

message: I found very extrange that this article just talks about Peruvian victories,when the war wass won by the Greater Colombia.I suggest to correct this,or put the neutrality disputed tag--Andres rojas22 23:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can I interject? Well I will, only to state that "greater" is not the same as "great", perhaps then as winning is not the same as losing? Anyway, we are now in peace and merry-"-Todos Llegan de Noche, todos se van de día" 14:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral? 

message: "Peruvian President Jose de La Mar had been born in the city of Cuenca, in present-day Ecuador, which was, in 1828, part of the disputed territory and de facto part of Gran Colombia."
Is this line really necessary to the war? It is in the land war section and if it will remain as part of the article perhaps it be moved to a more appropriate section?
I do not think this line is necessary to the war as the significance to the war is never mentioned. The impact of the line is never established which makes it feel as if it is a random piece of trivia. I could be wrong so the I shall keep the line for now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 21Helios12 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps unnecessary sentence
Talk:War of the Confederation

message: He fought for both sides!  At first he allied himself with Santa Cruz, but later, when the 2nd expedition landed in North Peru he changed side and fought for the destruction of the Confederation.
Over 1,500 Peruvian troops fought alongside Chilean troops in the Yungay Battle. The dominant political Peruvian class did not want an alliance between Bolivia and Peru because, among other reasons, they didn't want a Bolivian president. In that battle Bulnes was having problems and, according to historians, he wanted to retreat but he was stopped by Peruvian General Ramon Castilla, the real hero of this battle, and who was fighting along with Bulnes against the Confederation. Castilla pushed Bulnes and at the end the victory was assured. The alliance Peru-Chile won that battle.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alvaro3010 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obregoso 

message: Chilean-Confederation war →  War of the Confederation  - Rationale:   The common name used in the history books of Latin America is War of the Confederation , not the new one that has been substituted and represents a clear POV.   The name comes not from a list of the participants (Argentina, Chile, Confederation) but from the fact that the ultimate goal of each side was either to preserve or eliminate the Confederation as a political entity within Latin America . The new name “Chilean-Confederation War” assumes only two participants, which is not the case, and is not even in common use in Peru, the only place where it has some actual proponents. The older Peruvian historians all use “War of the Confederation”. Propose going back to  War of the Confederation since it is the most commonly used name in all history books   --   Mel Romero 01:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: * The move seems to be already executed, so this request is closed. --Dijxtra 08:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Just deleted the phrase of problably most bloody battle of latinamerican history,which is more problably the Battle of Tuyutí of the war of the triple alliance--Andres rojas22 17:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Yungay 

message: This article fuses two different wars. The war of the confederation itself and the Argentine-Bolivian war that involved just Bolivia and Argentina (leting outside of this to Peru). Neither of the first two countries considers this events as the same war. They always treat them as separate wars in their historiography. --Ají Picante (talk) 04:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Two separate wars
Talk:Rebellions of 1837–1838

message: A good start, with a good number of sections, and including a picture. Though it might be nice if the image caption said a little more about where it came from. Is it a painting? Who's it by? When was it painted? I recognize that the subject matter of this article is described in more length in a number of other articles, and as such this serves as basically a glorified, fleshed-out disambig page. Nevertheless, there must be more that can be said here. Flesh out the sections on the individual rebellions, and add more on the background (causes) and aftermath (effects) - those things which all the rebellions have in common, and which thread through the whole set of events thematically and historically. LordAmeth 02:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment

message: Rebels were executed for treason, pure and simple. The rambling argument that "However, the rebels were not really convicted because their views aligned with the liberalism of the US, and thus caused some kind of offense to the Tory values of the Canadian colonies. Rather, as revealed in the ruling of Chief Justice Sir John Robinson, a Lockean justification was given for the prisoners' condemnation, and not a Burkean one: the Crown, as protector of the lives, liberty and prosperity of its subjects, could "legitimately demand allegiance to its authority" is pointless. There was no argument then or since that they were executed because their political views caused offense to Tories. To suggest that this was the obvious reason is bizarre. The justification of capital punishment for treason is likely not Burkean, but more pragmatic. Every state (used to) execute people for treason, whatever its politics or ideology.Royalcourtier (talk) 04:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Execution for treason 

message: Most sources do so. See http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/rebellions-of-1837/
If no objections, I will move it and the title will be Rebellions of 1837-1838. Your thoughts @User:Charles lindberg and @User:Moxy? 
Peter K Burian (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Moxy I knew I could rely on you to find a good book to cite. Peter K Burian (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be titled Rebellions of 1837-1838 

message: The introduction talks about these rebellions, which were armed uprisings "motivated by frustrations with political reform," and that "a key shared goal was responsible government." Weren't these armed uprisings trying to oust the British and not much concerned with "reform" or "responsible government?" The article states that these moderate views came about after, not during. It also states that there is some idea of putting these rebellions in context with other anti-monarchial rebellions, the American is one named example. What serious approach would consider examination without context? -Inowen (NLFTE) 05:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vacillatory 

message: This is a good article Trajan anntonnius (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How's life?
Talk:Snake War

message: The primary reason for the Snake war was the Homestead Act of 1862. That was enacted because Lincoln snd his radicals created a depression and giving away land was how they bought bites. ALL of the land opened for settlers was our treaty lands. Whites didn’t “encroach”, they swarmed. Lincoln sent Buffalo Soldiers snd bounty hunters to kill us and steal our kind. That what happened in the Valley If A Thousand Springs, Bear River and the Mahluer Indian Reservation. Lincoln was no hero. That bastard bought votes with Indian lives. 2600:6C55:4AF0:A320:8CFB:29A1:6FE7:449E (talk) 02:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Afh1858 (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST3443 The Frontier Before 1850
Talk:Billy Bathgate (film)

message: "He successfully charms the locals, presenting himself as charming and good natured." Not very elegant, since you use "charms" and "charming" in it. Substitute the verbal phrase, "wins over" in place of "successfully charms". See https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/win_over Autodidact1 (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please rewrite this sentence 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Billy Bathgate (film) (film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 19:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Billy Bathgate (film) (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: After checking the Australian rating board website, seems Australia got a censored version that minutes short of the US r rated version. Australian version is only m rated. However anyone able to dig out secondary sources to further prove that? 2405:6E00:2688:3322:1062:D9ED:4A65:2F49 (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australia
Talk:Avon Products

message: Can someone tell me when a product was sold where the container was in the shape of a 'roman lady's ' head? 75.159.130.187 (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was a product sold with a container representing a "roman lady"? 

message: Text and references copied from Avon Products to Alexander D. Henderson.  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution