Talk:Underworld: Evolution

message: The film summary was horribly long, dull and badly written. I tried cutting it down, and probably sliced it by half. It's still really long, and maybe someone wants to edit it further. A summary should probably cover the major plot points, but doesn't need to give a total film play-by-play. Davey1107 (talk) 03:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: Having just seen this movie, in the scrolling marquee at the beginning Marcus' name is spelled Markus.
The paragraph states:
MARKUS, BITTEN BY A BAT,
BECAME THE BLOOD LEADER OF THE VAMPIRES.''
I thought it was interesting to note. --Behälter (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Typographical Error?

message: I don't think that some of those inconsistencies make sense, because it appears to be someone else's personal review of Underworld Evolution. Is there a requirement for sources to be cited in such a case?
Darklord of the Sith Daniel Lim 14:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's an extremely long argument for a series that is only two movies and a small fan group. If there is such a thing as overanalyzing, this has to be it. --Destron Commander 14:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Sign your posts.  The problem with the section has nothing to do with whether there are inconsistencies or not or whether the ones stated are viable.  It has to do with the fact that the section is an opinion piece and this is not the place for it.  It doesn't need cleanup, it needs deletion.  Canonblack 07:19, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: This is incorrect. The first movie states that she is six hundred years old, and the second movie states that she's 800 years old. How can that not be considered an inconsistency? As for the rest of your point, yes, Viktor was revealed in UE to have wiped out Selene's family because they knew of William's hiding place, but nowhere in either film does anyone mention any connection between Lucian and William. This would appear to be conjecture on your part.
User:Oshram 10:15 15 August 2007
Viktor was only making certain that Lucian would not try to open William's tomb because Lucian had possession of one of the keys. The killing of her family was a mere precaution. Viktor could not know if Lucian knew more about William's tomb, and he also did not know how mad Lucian might had gone. User: IsabellaRenee 1:12 18 December 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.171.235.226 (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Inconsistencies 

message: I have to say that as it stands, this article is a little bit awful. The plot summary is nearly a blow by blow account of the movie - which is not a summary. I am going to have a go at shortening this and also wikifying it.-Localzuk(talk) 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awful 

message: Why is there a bolded section at the beginning of the article?  This is the only article that I have ever seen to have something like that.  Delete it? soldierx40k 13:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most articles are like this. According to Wikipedia:Lead section, "The article's subject should be mentioned at the earliest natural point in the prose in the first sentence, and should appear in boldface." Think outside the box 17:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bold?

message: :Image:Underworld2evolution.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Underworld2evolution.jpg

message: The plot summary is not too long or too detailed.  Readers of Wikipedia want and expect full plot summaries with spoilers.  Otherwise, book and movie entries become lower-quality versions of criticism easily available elsewhere.  Full plot summary with spoilers is the only thing Wikipedia offers that other sources do not.  D40 (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: D40, you do not speak for "readers of Wikipedia." Some guy (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: I have re-inserted this image as I think it is important for any film article to have at least one screenshot, preferrably showing the protagonist or the film's visual style or both. I think showing the appearance of main characters should be considered a suitable justification, but if that's not good enough, we could definitely add critical commentary related to the screenshot. There is currently nothing in the article about the film's visual style, such as heavy use of darkness and a blue-hued pallette. We could discuss the visual style and usage of blue which is apparent in the screenshot, as well as the costumes and makeup used for the characters, or the special effects used in this particular scene. Some guy (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UnderworldEvolutionSS.png

message: I cut down the summary somewhat, and changed the wording to make it a bit shorter and more concise. AlessaGillespie (talk) 09:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You dropped it down to only 5 sentences. Please don't do that again. Shorter does not mean erase everything and write in only a few words. AlessaGillespie (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Some summary changes 

message: The spelling of "Markus" in the opening text crawl is a goof. His name is spelled as "Marcus" in the ending credits, the official website, the production notes, and all of the official novelizations. AlessaGillespie (talk) 03:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marcus vs Markus 

message: Someone needs to make the original score section alone with the soundtrack section. 152.250.153.191 (talk) 01:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score section