Talk:Business rules engine

message: The spelling is not consistent   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.58.39.247 (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rule engine Vs Rules engine

message: An inference engine may infer facts from existing facts/non-fact inputs. Business Rules Engines and Production Engines are based on the use of conditional rules. An inference engine may be constructed using rules. Howeve, a inference engine may be constructed using Neural Net and other technologies for pattern recognition to infer facts, and in such cases can include abductive logic. In which case it would clearly not be a Business Rules Engine nor would it be a Production Engine. In that respect, Business Rules Engine or Production Engine can be considered to be a sub catagory of an Inference Engine.192.91.172.36 (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Merge 

message: JA: I requested admin assist to move Rule engine to Business rules engine for the reason given as "fit title to content and related articles, and to undo an ill-considered redirect", as a previous version of the content was initially under the title Business rules engine but subsequently redirected to this overly generic title, which is used more broadly in Artificial intelligence and not just in enterprise applications.  Thank you, Jon Awbrey 16:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 07:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The consensus amongst the greater intellectual population out there is that this is worth it if you have money to throw around at resources to manage them. If you are not one for vestigial thought, then perhaps you should re-consider.
unsupported comments like this have no place in wikipedia.  if you can provide real-world numbers as to why rules engines are more efficient or powerful or easy to maintain when compared to other languages, i'd love to see them.  if not, then this should be removed.
--192.223.226.6 16:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it worth investing? - PHB comment 

message: With the mention of JSR and POJOs, this page seems too biased towards java if this article is discussing business rule engines in general. Hertzsprung 15:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have an issue with it mentioning JSRs and POJOs, however if there are other standard interfaces for other languages just add these to a standards section. The article just needs to be expanded for other languages.
Matthew - 26 March 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.138.1.245 (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Java-centric? 

message: Production (Rules) Systems is an older term, and is not commonly used today.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AWebEditor (talk • contribs) 23:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on the term 

message: Inference engines are types of rule engines, so if the pages are merged, Business Rules Engine should remain as the title.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AWebEditor (talk • contribs) 23:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Inference Engine? 

message: Do you mean that business rule is itself knowledge and creates information (e.g. events)?
On the other hand, workflow(-system) performs business tasks based on those rules (or knowledge)? 
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.6.237 (talk) 16:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business rules produce knowledge; work flows perform business work.  

message: ”Gold-level customers are eligible for free shipping when order quantity > 10” and “maximum order quantity for Gold-level customers = 10” 72.221.66.99 (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a joke? 

message: An image used in this article, File:Rule engine.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Rule engine.png Nominated for speedy Deletion