Talk:Gain–bandwidth product

message: I added the WikiProject Electronics template since this article pertains to this WikiProject.
Class: I rated this article as a stub-class article because it has absolutely no sources. According to the WikiProject Electronics assessment page, if an article has no listed sources, it is a stub, regardless how informative, well-written, or long it is. This is simply because such articles are not verifiable, which Wikipedia holds in very high regard.
Importance: The article falls we under the description of mid importance from the WikiProject Electronics assessment page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronics/Assessment).
I also added this article to the Electronics portal because I thought it was obviously befitting.
--Some Old Man (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of the Filled Parameters in the Added WikiProject Electronics Template 

message: Since the article requires sources for verification, I added the template noting in on the article page.
--Some Old Man (talk) 04:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Addition of <nowiki>{{Refimprove|article|{{subst:DATE}}|talk=y}}</nowiki> to the Article Page 

message: : Added one graph --Petteri Aimonen (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added graph 

message: I have changed the last example so it reads, "Further, if the <emph>maximum<emph> frequency of operation is 1 Hz, then the maximum gain that can be extracted from the device is 1 x 106" for an op-amp with a GBWP of 1 MHz (emphasis added).  That is what the article used to say.  On 25 August 2009, someone at IP address 132.68.50.34 changed "maximum" to "minimum."  I do not believe this is correct, and no explanation was given, so I changed it back to "maximum."  I would welcome a discussion if others think "minimum" is correct. -- WakingLili (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You did good.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example changed from "minimum" to "maximum" 

message: For those people who are not electrical engineers, and for any article, please define ALL variables, constants, etc.
w (omega) is frequency in radians per second,
wc is cutoff frequency in radians per second
etc.
I think the spirit of these articles should be that a person can just read them cold, without having to already know the jargon!
71.139.173.203 (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define everything, please! 

message: Why does the image show a low frequency roll off?  Op-amps don't have that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.66.172 (talk) 01:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gain–bandwidth product. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110630045749/http://www.dplibrary.org/ to http://www.dplibrary.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is not clear how A1(w) was expanded using taylor's series. 
Aditya 08:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to elaborate on expansion