Talk:Field-emission display

message: "For gamers, game consoles with light guns may be able to react to the object that emits the sufficient lighting dynamics on the screen like on conventional CRTs which emit a flexible range of light dynamics; whereas, an LCD flat-panel monitor will only produce color and illuminate it with a backlight."
My understanding is that light guns operate via the vertical refresh mechanics of a CRT display. They would not work correctly where there is no vertical refresh cycle, such as in a FED/SED/LCD or Plasma. Also one could question the relevancy as to if any modern consoles even sell light guns anymore.
Klinky 01:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light-guns need hopping-patch or flying-dot raster scan ? 

message: The article isn't clear between differences of FED and SED, which are superior, or why they are different approaches.  Could someone provide info?--Saoshyant talk / contribs (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 15:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FED and SED - is there a difference ? 

message: "Like LCDs, FEDs are energy efficient and could provide a flat panel technology that features less power consumption than existing LCD and plasma display technologies." This doesn't make any sense, so I'm taking the "Like LCDs" off the front. Hinges 03:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power comsumption 

message: :Unlike LCD displays, the FED may have flexible handling of non-standard resolutions that LCDs will emulate poorly due to their native resolutions.
This doesn't make much sense. This is as much an array of shiny spots as an LCD display; the scaling is done by an internal software. Anybody got any sources on this? — Mütze 05:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this should be added again, but as disadavantage over conventional CRTs, which allow free resolution scaling without emulation. --80.109.39.94 (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantage: scaling? 

message: It seems that disadvantages take a great part of the article beyond neutrality. Though advantages exist, they aren't categorized like disadvantages. Students like me may think FED is a poor technology. 211.241.93.129 (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not wanting to be snarky, but being investor bait is not a technical advantage. No commercial product has ever been sold.  As a research topic or tool field emission cathodes are of great value -- for consumer display, not so much.  Field emitters require a continuously pumped high vacuum, usually 10-9,  which excludes them from cheap, long-lived consumer applications.  Those of us in the industry tried...really hard! OldZeb (talk) 03:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV suspected 

message: Does anybody know something about the pixel size or the resolution (dpi) that we may expect for FED computer monitors? Or is it something which is limited by marketing rather than by technology? -- Hokanomono ✉ 15:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pixel size or Resolution? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Field emission display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060616161055/http://sharp-world.com:80/sc/library/lcd_e/s2_6_3e.htm to http://sharp-world.com/sc/library/lcd_e/s2_6_3e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Field emission display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616183341/http://www.eetasia.com/ARTICLES/2007AUG/PDF/EEOL_2007AUG16_OPT_TA.pdf to http://www.eetasia.com/ARTICLES/2007AUG/PDF/EEOL_2007AUG16_OPT_TA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Field emission display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090413154548/http://www.fe-tech.co.jp/ to http://www.fe-tech.co.jp/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified