Talk:Billy Hutchinson

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: A year of birth would be nice--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:17, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You got it. Keresaspa (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: From Ulster loyalism: "It is strongly associated with paramilitarism." That's not synonymous with synonymous. Gob Lofa (talk) 10:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I like how out of the first paragraph of the lede you quote the unsourced statement of it and disregard the rest of what an "Ulster loyalist" is. How can you be sure that they were presenting loyalist paramilitary demands and not just simply loyalist demands? Just because they were associated with paramilitaries (obviously having been members), how do you know they weren't making demands that were those of all those who describe themselves as loyalist, strongly associated or not at all? Do you have sources to make the distinction? Surely if they were presenting paramilitary demands it would be listed as UVF demands seeing as that is the group they were members of and the group the PUP was aligned with. I doubt they'd be making demands for the UDA. Mabuska (talk) 22:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't like the wording; it's as if they have a monopoly on loyalism, when the DUP take far more of the loyalist vote. Gob Lofa (talk) 02:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not the place for imposing your pesonal opinion on articles. Mabuska (talk) 12:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not my opinion; you can check the poll results in loyalist areas. Gob Lofa (talk) 13:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-paramilitary loyalists 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Billy Hutchinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/loyalist-paramilitary-groups-start-weapons-decommissioning-14367131.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060321121211/http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/archive/1712/sw171229.htm to http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/archive/1712/sw171229.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified