lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1994–95 NHL season

message: Isn't the "GP" (games played) column in the standings redundant?  Every team in the league played forty-eight games and the second sentence in the article even comments that each team played forty-eight games! - Ecksem Diem 16:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I ain't got the sources on me to proove it. But, during the regular season, the Eastern Conference teams did not play the Western Conference teams. GoodDay (talk) 00:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regular Season 

message: The redirect 1995 NHL season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 20:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:1995 NHL season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1993–94 NHL season

message: Mogilny is NOT the first first non-North American captain. That goes to Lars-Erik Sjöberg, who captained the Winnipeg Jets in 1979-80.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NYR682 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alexander Mogilny 

message: Since in a previous edit, SNIyer12 seems to have agreed that mentioning the next appearance of a Canadian team in the Stanley Cup Finals is unnecessary, I propose removing the re-introduction of this information by SNIyer12. I do not believe it to be sufficiently notable to warrant mention. isaacl (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't care one way or the other, but, it does seem to be nothing more than trivia.  Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

text: I have removed the 'trivia'. GoodDay (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreshadowing of future 

message: The claim in the article that Game 7 of the 1994 Final is considered by some to be the best Game 7 is NHL history is unsupported and the statement constitutes weasel words. Taxman1913 (talk) 00:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Game 7
Talk:A1 Team Great Britain

message: As this dispute has been resolved, or is rapidly approaching resolution with the aid of the RfC below, the listing on the third opinion project page has been removed.  
Please respond here if the listing should be re-instated.  Thank you.  — Athaenara  ✉  03:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion
Talk:A1 Team USA

message: This article includes information on the A1 team but also how the people who run the A1 team decided to run the Indy 500. It really needs splitting. Guroadrunner 05:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A1 team info meshes poorly with IRL team info 

message: I nominate "Old Glory" for the "nickname" info shown on the team page. 97.125.28.1 (talk) 07:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The nickname section is only for the "official" car nickname, as is sometimes used in the official A1GP broadcasts and in the news stories. Not all cars have nicknames, those that don't just have an n/a put there. TheChrisD Rants•Edits 09:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car nickname
Talk:Pierpont prime

message: The information I included comes entirely from this web page. Doesn't seem quite relevant to the article, but it seems useful to record the reference. Hv 03:11, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  mathematics of paper folding 

message: Last night, I removed the statement
:"As of 2005, the largest known Pierpont prime is 247 362 + 1 = 53694226297143959644031344050777763036004353, discovered by Walter Nissen."
I did so rather hastily with a terse edit summary, for which I apologize.
However, my removal was reverted with the summary "I'm convinced Nissen discovered it." This may well be true, but in my interpretation of WP:V, we cannot make a claim like this without some corraboration. This is not the most important point for me however. I find it very hard to believe that this is indeed the largest known Pierpont prime. I believe it is not that hard to test 100-digit numbers of this structure for primality. So, I'm intending to remove that sentence again. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for not deleting immediately. Why don't we vote on this?  Giftlite 23:32, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest known Pierpont prime 

message: The first sentence should read thus:
::A Pierpont prime, named after XXXX Pierpont, is a prime number greater than 3 having the form
:::2^u 3^v + 1\,
::for some integers u,v ≥ 0.
Michael Hardy 19:29, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's Pierpont??
Talk:List of book titles taken from literature

message: I'm tempted to add a "Lack of Context" tag to this article. I think an introductory paragraph needs to be added to explain what this list is all about, as it is not immediately obvious. 23skidoo 03:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: @23skidoo ok Sarahgradberg (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a better introduction

message: Editor Otto4711 has yesterday added the  tag. I didn't create this list in the first place, but I have edited it. I think that the demand for sourcing is unreasonable.
The only way in which the list as a whole could be sourced is if it was based on a similar published list. It isn't that, because it's based on wikipedia content, like a disambiguation page. Nobody demands sourcing for disambiguation pages, because they are simply lists of links within wikipedia. Structurally this is very similar. For each individual entry the appropriate sourcing is the statement within the article giving the origin of the book name, and mostly this is indeed present. If Otto4711 thinks the the whole list should be deleted, he should propose that explicitly (though I'd vote against), but asking for sourcing is asking the impossible. SamuelTheGhost (talk)
:I agree, so I have been bold and have removed it. The point of sources is for the information inserted in Wikipedia to be verifiable, and each entry of this list is immediately verifiable: in a sense the column "Literary reference" is the, well, reference for the respective table row. Goochelaar (talk) 18:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody added the tag back about a year ago and I support that change. For some books with titles referencing other literature, the connection may seem obvious, but it's not always. I can imagine there have been titles that might look like they were taken from literature but weren't. With that in mind, I added a column in the table for references that corroborate the claim that the title of a book in one column of the table actually is taken from the literature mentioned in the other column in the table. Anybody else is welcome to add citations in that column for rows in the table that are not yet cited. --Dugan Murphy (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ''unsourced'' tag 

message: It's too English-world centered--83.60.60.8 (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: bias

message: We already have one for Shakespeare and I think Bible quotation titles are probably up there in frequency with Shakespeare quotation titles. StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we have a separate page for the Bible? 

message: in need of a book titles Sarahgradberg (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  book titles
Talk:Lüders band

message: Is the process of Luder banding what makes for the characteristic creaking sound metal can make as it bends? —BenFrantzDale 03:30, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
: (3.5 years later…) I think it is the twinning, not the Lüders bands, that causes the sound.
: cdang|write me 15:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sound

message: Hello,
in French, we write Lüders with an s. In Germany, they also put an s but as it is in compound names, it could be the possessive (similar to english "'s").
Who's right ?
cdang|write me 15:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lüders ? 

message: You might find this video useful here - http://vimeo.com/kstreetstudio/ludersbands
If you like I can generate an animated gif from the video and make individual frames of the video available for this page.
M610 (talk) 23:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Talk:Whitey's Lindy Hoppers

message: A lot of this information was taken from savoystyle.com. There's more information there that isn't here, but I didn't want to lift the whole page for copyright reasons. I know there is more information out there on this group. Maybe a list of more members. And why is Frankie Manning the only member with his own page? What about Al Minns or Leon James, or Norma Miller? And should there be a page for the Ray Rand Swingers, the dance troupe from the west coast?
: I've added Frankie Manning's autobiography as further reading. If anyone wants to do some digging, it probably has enough material for at least a good stub (more in some cases) on many of the dancers mentioned here. - Jmabel | Talk 16:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content and SavoyStyle.com 

message: Was curious on opinion here. The California Routine is a somewhat significant routine, but (I would say) not significant enough to meet WP:Notability to have its own WP article. However, I would think that it is significant enough to have a section within an article, of which, I think this would be the most appropriate article to host such a section. Several other articles mention the California Routine (such as the Hot Shots article) and these could link to this article either directly (with appropriate section hash tag), or to "California Routine" page but have that page redirect to the section within this article. Any thoughts on this? As I said, I think it's significant enough to deserve a section. — al-Shimoni (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Routine
Talk:Guerrilla War (video game)

message: The screenshot in this article loooks to me like the NES version, not the arcade one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.100.46.4 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshots 

message: Get rid of this section. Without a citation, this reeks of a personal boast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.239.96.162 (talk) 23:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Record 

message: I decided to add this article to the category "Video games set in Cuba" due to the fact that the Japanese version is set there.
--190.27.106.175 (talk) 04:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese version set in Cuba 

message: I can't find any evidence of an Apple II release of this game. I'll keep trying to find evidence but eventually, Apple II instances will have to be removed if reliable sources can't be found. Bumm13 (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apple II
Talk:Floral Park Memorial High School

message: The first citation links to a incorrect website with statistics from another school... this wrecks part of the article.
I changed to title caps.  I thought that would be more appropriate.  I really think this should go to VfD but I thought I would add the stub first and see if the article would be expanded.  I adhere to the philosophy that Wikipedia in not paper.  Psy guy (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First citation WRONG
Talk:Happy Mondays

message: As far as I know, the band never used an article with their name.  Shouldn't it just be "Happy Mondays", or did they ever use the "the"?
:Yes, Happy Mondays it is, as you can see.
:Derek R Bullamore 00:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The?

message: Aren't the Mondays from Salford, not Manchester? Jhamez84 22:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The group were formed in 1980; Salford is in Greater Manchester, and has been, continuously since 1974. Nietzsche 2 (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester? 

message: What is going on in the introduction to this article?  It's not at all the style of wikipedia or any other encyclopedia.  It's written like an amusing article by a fan of the band.  Some effort for NPOV perhaps?  ex's of what is innapropriate: "if you've ever seen amadeus..." "their music is sexy" etc etc etc
Frazerho 23:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: These pages only exist as redirects back to this page, which is misleading and pointless.--James317a (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pages about keyboardist Paul Davis, and drummer Gary Whelan
Talk:Joseph Gallagher

message: The article says 2002, but British Chess Championship indicates 2001.  Which is correct? Quale 04:37, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As this page and the Chessbase database attest, it was 2001. He was half a point behind the winner Ramesh in 2002. --Camembert 12:05, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  British chess champion in 2001 or 2002?
Wikipedia talk:ISP contact information

message: At the risk of being told to FOAD, I'm not sure it's an appropriate shortcut.  How about WP:ISPS?  -- Norvy (talk) 04:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've added WP:ISPS. --MarkSweep✍ 09:41, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

text: The latter.--LX 16:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shortcut

message: Does this list mean these ISPs will take action against its users if it's documented they are a Wikipedia vandal/abuser?  Or is it just a list where you can to look up each ISP's policy and decide whether to report a vandal or not?  How receptive are ISPs to complaints of Wikipedia abuse? (Hope I haven't missed the answers somewhere else). --Kat 21:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not very receptive at all, in general. My experience from reporting attempts to compromise SSH or HTTP servers, Bell, Comcast, and Shaw are particularly unresponsive to any type of abuse report. Shaw, for example, seems quite happy to provide services to fraud operations, so I doubt they'll care much about people writing naughty words on some hippie encyclopedia project. ;-) --LX 16:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This list is merely here as a convenience. It seems that, in practice, it is seldom used.--76.203.48.177 03:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As if any ISP has the responsibility to stop users from changing wikipedia in any way they see fit. I could see them caring if someone was breaking the law, but it's HARDLY against the law to replace words in articles with "poo poo" or "penis penis penis". You guys are priceless. 64.230.85.80 (talk) 12:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it can be illegal. In some countries, it would be a serious mistake to conduct such behavior. Also, harassment is illegal in many countries. It can be considered harassment. In cases where particular users are harassed or threatened, it can certainly be considered illegal. Copyright violations are most certainly illegal and violate nearly all ISP AUPs. Many ISPs use robots that won't be able to read Wikipedia's logs, especially Earthlink. Wikipedia vandalism also may constitute hacking, which violates most ISPs' AUP. I know how abuse depts operate because I used to work for the one at Heron Creek Middle School. Maybe if Wikipedia put their logs in GMT format as required by most abuse depts, abuse reports would be responded to. There are some abuse depts that are composed of downright idiots and dumb robots, but that's not a reason to condemn all abuse depts now is it? 71.3.214.71 (talk) 18:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this list mean?

message: Damn.  My ISP is gonna cut me off.  LOL.  Wiki geeks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.93.187 (talk) 02:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, don't vandalize and you won't get disconnected. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't report me 

message: The Acceptable Use Policy at Qwest ISP has changed URLs.
New URL is http://www.qwest.com/legal/usagePolicy.html
The old link leads you to a log-in page.
--Manway (talk) 21:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qwest Change
Talk:Lochaber axe

message: I've added this as WPMILHIST and classified it as Start... njan 20:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's been a similar problem in the Mortuary Hilt page, those aren't Mortuary Hilts being shown, just claymore. I think we should remove the reference to the Mortuary Hilts in the photograph's description.--Caliburnis 09:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortuary Hilts in Photograph 

message: An obscure Aberdeen by-law states each business premesis should have a Lochaber Axe on the premesis in case of attack, this law has never been repealed and some businesses do indeed have such an axe (behind locked cases) on the premesis. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.69.1.116 (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aberdeen by-law 

message: The page about the Halberd says this isn't a Halberd. Can someone figure out who is right? --98.229.36.30 (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: The page states the Lochaber axe was used as a pike against infantry. I find this extremely hard to swallow, since the infantry use of pikes was to have a wall of points at the end of very long hafts to keep the foe at bay, a use which is obviously not compatible with the design of either specimen 
shown on the page in pictures. Actually, the two specimens shown seem to have fairly short hafts to even count as polearms. The one shown in hand of a reenactor actually looks like a voulge, except the haft is far too short (or the lad is a virtual giant). Not being a proper historian of the location and period, I'd rather see advice from knowledgeable folk before I take it unto myself to modify the acrticle. --Svartalf (talk) 00:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pike use?
Talk:Wisteria sinensis

message: A request was made to move this article to the scientific name. This request was not fulfilled due to a lack of discussion, and therefore a lack of consensus for it. Rob Church Talk 12:52, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: Q. I have heard that this plant is invasive in parts of the US. Needed info?
re: In response to the above inquiry for information about Wisteria sinensis' statust as an invasive exotic species;
The University of Georgia, Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, is a clearinghouse for such information. 
( http://www.invasive.org/ )
This link should provide a place to start; http://www.invasive.org/browse/subinfo.cfm?sub=3083 .
By any metric you care to apply, Wisteria sinensis (And the Japanese Wisteria floribunda.) is an invasive exotic species wherever it has become established.
(Ice9baby (talk) 23:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  invasive 

message: Please add close-up photos of flowers and leaves.-71.174.176.65 (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos of flowers and leaves
Talk:John Carroll University

message: 
Enjoy! --Daysleeper47 20:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  JCU Userbox 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.jcu.edu/studentl/reslife/firstyear/halls.htm https://www.jcu.edu/news-center/john-carroll-university-names-melissa-cole-inaugural-director-nursing-and-strategic https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/23130/V086N3_051.pdf?sequence=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — SamX [talk · contribs] 19:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Prematurity

message: I reverted because the usage quoted simply seems like an application of the ordinary meaning of prematurity to me. Can you cite an example of the specific technical use of the this term? alteripse 05:08, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted back and added a citation.--Carl Hewitt 05:42, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Prematurity in Scientific Discovery
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/to do

message: Please add to this list.  Struck-through items have already been done.
* Move the page (and the current talk page, and all of the talk page archives)
* Construct a list of all sub-pages to be moved.
** Move all subpages (An offer has been made to do this via a bot.)  After this has been done:
*** Check all double-redirects caused by the sub-page moves (some sub-pages redirect to other sub-pages, where articles were nominated as a group)
*** Update the wording in 
*** Update the wording in 
** List of currently moved subpages
**# Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old
**# Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Log/Today
**# Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/
**# Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Log/Yesterday
**# Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old/Transwiki
**# Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Maintenance
* Move the shortcuts
*# VFD
*# Vfd
*# VfD
*# WP:VFD
*# WP:Vfd
*# WP:VfD
*# Wikipedia:VFD
*# Wikipedia:Vfd
*# Wikipedia:VfD
*# WP:VFD/Old
*# WP:VFD/Today
*# WP:VFD/Yesterday
* Review for and fix the double redirects
* Update pages that link to VFD
** Wikipedia:WP
* Move the Guide to VfD
* Update the wording of Wikipedia:Guide to deletion Done. --Titoxd 05:33, 2 September 2005 (UTC)