lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hilton Coliseum

message: I agree with the addition of this tag; it's on my rewrite list. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The "Future Construction" section is empty. Unless something can be put in it, shouldn't it be deleted? 64.85.242.19 (talk) 20:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Construction 
Talk:One America Initiative

message: *This piece needs some real copyediting. --evrik 19:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Copy-editing does not change the content of an article, it just fizes style, grammar, spelling, punctuation etc. I have removed the copy-edit tag from the Temp article, so that if it is reisntated it will not be tagged. Copy in the temp article is fine. JenLouise 03:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting
Talk:Vat dye

message: Vat dyeing = dyeing using a bucket ("vat")
Vat dyestuff = a dyestuff which is applied in its "leuco" (reduced) state and as it oxidizes with air oxygen, the colour develops. Anthraquinone vat dyes are the most important group of vat dyestuffs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.2.135.162 (talk) 14:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed
Talk:Dolpo

message: The page says that inhabitants of Dolpo mainly practice Bon, this couldn't be more false. Some people do practice Bon but definitely not anything close to a majority. Most people are Hindu (lower) or Buddhist (upper and Dho)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.35.108 (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Saint Elen

message: has added a sentence that asserts that a townland and a church in County Wexford are dedicated to Elen.
*Saint Helen is also remembered in Ireland; largely as a result of Norman influence. There is a townland and church in her name in south County Wexford for example.
The cited sources do not establish a link to Elen. The duchas.ie source says:
* Some hold St Helen was the mother of Constantine, others that she was St Helen of Sweden. I believe there was some important foundation here in Celtic times.
This does not mention the Welsh Elen, and in any case this does not look like a reliable source. Norman influence would be more likely to have honoured Helen of Constantinople. There were significant links between the early medieval churches in Wales and Ireland and it is quite possible that Elen was revered in Ireland, but we need a reliable source for this. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found an image of the information plaque on the ruins of St Helen's Church near Rosslare. The plaque does not specify which St Helen. A report in the Irish Independent newspaper also mentions St Helen, without specifying which, and I assume that the writer meant Helen of Constantinople. Most dedications to St Helen outside Wales seem to be to Helen of Constantinople. You still have not given a source to confirm a connection with Elen. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: County Wexford
Talk:Tomasz Sikorski

message: I am planning a major expansion of this page over the next day or so.--Thudso 19:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Move (Freak Kitchen album)

message: This article is not at all written from a neutral point of view.  It reads like a fan's review, not an encyclopaedic article.  I'm not very familiar with the album, so could someone who is familiar with it please clean this article up? - Axver 05:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the praise and glorification of the album.  I like the band but when I read it I felt more like I was reading a metal sites review done by a person that would shout: "I AM YOUR GREATEST FAN!!!" and was amazed it was up like this on wikipedia.  I enjoy the band, but am not as familiar with their music as I'd like to be... so now this article is a bit short and empty and I'm not too sure how to contribute to it since I don't even know how to get much information on this band itself. -- MaxDuo (talk) 15:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not NPOV 
Talk:Pyrazole

message: Picture on the synthesis doesn't show a diketone  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.30.198.212 (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right, the picture shows an unsaturated aldehyde (the first synthesis mentioned), the diketone is in the equation below. Markussep Talk 15:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does "psychoanaleptic" means? --134.155.99.41 18:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychoanalpetic
Talk:Ozzfest: Second Stage Live

message: This likely isn't a recording of 2000 Ozzfest as disc two is identical to the Ozzfest '97 CD (bar cut of "Ride Thy Neighbour" by Cellophane. 91.104.201.89 (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2000?
Talk:Standard Schnauzer

message: This image is cute, but unencyclopediac and adds absolutely nothing to the article. I really think it should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by APBTgirl (talk • contribs) 16:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schnauzer taking a snooze?? 

message: The article says "Life span 13 to 16 years"
This girl is already 18 years old and is still jumping. ;)
Is it ok to correct the numbers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Varnav (talk • contribs) 07:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life span
Talk:Recreational diver training

message: BSAC, used a combination of amatures and professional instructors. The BSAC instructors workign professional outside of Brittan is probaly the main reason that BSAC no longer is a part of CMAS. Balp 19:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: BSAC Instructors

message: It is not clear to me where this list if from and what is supposed to include, e.g., clearly rebreathers are not an entry level topic.  The charts might be useful, but only if they are illustrating specific progressions and/or aiding in a compare and contrast of programs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki4robert&me (talk • contribs) 20:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: training topics

message: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as  is optional.Needs more references. 
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for , although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.More detail needed on all levels of training. 
The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.Structure is acceptable and can be expanded to deal with additional information. 
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.Looks OK. 
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.Illustration acceptable, but could be improved. 
Not yet. Expand and cite. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class review 
Category talk:Propagandists

message: Is this category NPOV?--Per Abrahamsen 19:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working to make it mostly people who worked in propaganda offices and did wartime propaganda. I hope this will be more NPOV.--T. Anthony 08:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

text: This category is used in a restricted way so the person you name, who I've never heard of, may not apply. --T. Anthony 11:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I just rewrote in the description WP:RS in the article have to say person or organization person associate with is propagandist for it to be in this category. CarolMooreDC 02:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: About category
Talk:Passaic Valley Regional High School

message: There is no proof that David Blaine went to this school. This rumor began as hearsay from a fellow wiki. It is unsubstantiated.
:First of all i heard it and did some research and found out its true, found his yearbook photo, and his former teachers new about him, infact there is a funny story about him and breakdancing. Tell me if you would like more info, because i have other confirmed stories of himThefool 19:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found his year book pic how do i up load it???
 ^^^^ You are all wrong! I went from kindergarten to 12th grade with David Blaine from Little Falls to Passaic Valley! we are close and still talk today.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.102.0.28 (talk) 00:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Blaine
Talk:Elocation

message: Someone put a article in reference to a band called Elocation, and deleted the article on the second album by the canadian band Default. I reverted it back so if anyone want to look at a complete discography for Default they can. I suggest that if you want to make an article about Elocation the band, create a new article called "Elocation (Band")4.155.102.70 (talk) 22:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Jagdterrier

message: Doing NPOV cleanup work.  It is inappropriate to tag an article without a post to the discussion page saying why it is tagged, and any specifics as to what can be done to improve the article. This also permits discussion and resolution between interested parties.  This is drive-by tagging, and I'm removing it.  And comments can be left here or on my talk page. Jjdon (talk) 22:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really get involved in dog breed articles anymore, but that was so NPOV that I had to remove it straight away. Crazy that it's sat in the article uncited for so long. Miyagawa (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Election/Evidence

message: :If either of you has rebuttal evidence, please make sure it goes to the evidence page as well as (preferably instead of) here. There is also a section in the workshop for detailed analysis of evidence. --Tony Sidaway 17:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried to leave the evidence on the evidence page.  Here I have only cited and quoted the evidence on the evidence page.  If you think some of what I said belongs on the evidence page, please let me know.  Also, would you prefer that the analysis I put on this talk page and the ensuing discussion be moved to the workshop?  -- noosphere 18:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now moved my evidence analysis and the ensuing discussions to the workshop, per what I take to be your suggestion.  -- noosphere 19:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Since I am new at this I would like to once again ask if the workshop is the proper place for the analysis originally posted here?  Is what's on that page going to be taken in to account in the decision making process, or are the arbitrators only going to read what's on the evidence page?  Thank you.  -- noosphere 07:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by Tony Sidaway 

message: ... sounds a lot like "I told someone with whom I disagreed to change what they wrote, and they told me to do it myself." 71.132.151.14 06:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Refusal to work collaboratively" 

message: Since I was quoted, let me chime in my two cents a little further.  (I'm not confident enough in my opinion to put it on the main page, but here it is.)
# I'll stand behind my statements about Ryan.  I've run into her on a bunch of pages, and I've never seen her act in anything other than the utmost good faith.  I rarely agree with her POV on the underlying issues, but she's always had a great committment to ensuring that the encylopedia has accurate and verifiable information.  She's always willing to engage discussions, and I think she's a great asset to Wikipedia. 
# I have no reason to believe that Phil is acting in anything other than good faith either.  I sympathize with his feelings about those pages (I'm not sure if I agree, but I sympathize).  So I'd hate to see this devolve into "Is Ryan or Phil a bad person," and I'm pretty sure it won't.
I also have a bunch of comments about this RFA on a whole, which, on reflection, I've moved to the main talk page.TheronJ 22:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Further to Ryan's quotation
Talk:Murphy's Law (band)

message: What a tremendous pile of fluff.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.68.34 (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it needs work but, surprisingly, there's not a lot of detailed history online to work from. There's not a whole lot of press, of any sort, available on the band in general. JohnBWatt 20:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm already aware of how to contact Jimmy. The thing is, it's too long of a history for me to get into and I've already done extensive re-writes of several other band articles. My interest in Murphy's Law is a bit more limited than that of the other bands. I just added some basic info. I'll leave a re-write to someone else though. JohnBWatt 21:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Band
Talk:Brazilian Terrier

message: what's the other Brazilian breed?
 
Answering your question the other one internationally known is the Fila Brasileiro (Brazilian Mastiff)
I took out the "one of only two breeds of dog developed in Brazil", first because it's not correct, there are more breeds developed in Brazil they are just not known outside the country ( the Brazilian Terrier is an example of this, it's been around in Brazil for hundreds of years and only recently has acquired international recognition).  And second because it would lead to the question above.  I did not think it right to put a link to the Fila's page because I don't think that's how they're organized ( there's not link to the American Bulldog on the American Pit Bull Terrier page and so on).  Maybe someone can add a category for Brazilian dog breeds.  I'll check if there's one in Portuguese.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notconnectedtome (talk • contribs) 03:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Brazilian dog?
Talk:Grand Bleu de Gascogne

message: The picture in the article is adorable, but it doesn't really demonstrate what the dog looks like. A photo in profile would serve better, I think. Anyone have one that can be shared? Canine virtuoso (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: This dog may have derived from dogs left by Phoenician traders, so claims Fogle. Dubious. On what basis is the author making this extraordinary claim? Were there no dogs existing in France 2,000 years ago until they arrived from the Middle East? Before thoughtlessly placing text on Wikipedia because it was written in a dog book, an editor needs to ascertain the basis of the statement. William Harris • (talk) • 19:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phoenicians?
Talk:Beauceron

message: This dog is not for for the faint of heart. Beaucerons are very intelligent and protective. Similar to the Belgian Malinois, this dog has aggressive tendencies and is not for the "average" dog owner. They need to be socialized very early with both people and other animals. Beaucerons are great dogs but do your homework (research) before you even consider this breed.
ok  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.22.37.31 (talk) 19:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Skirgaila

message: This article should be named as 'Skirgaila'! M.K 19:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 10:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I agree, naming him by Polish name doesn't seem logical to me. He had little to do with Poland, except for negotiations, and the territories he ruled are not on the current Polish territory. Juraune 05:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 10:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: Hi was regent, not Grand Duke. Azgar (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Duke of Lithuania
Talk:Finnish Lapphund

message: Removed request for photo, since the page now contains three images. Apdevries 20:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I've added in the "Lapland Sheepdog" image from 1915 based on the Finnish language version of this page, however I've not been able to find any good info on whether it was a distinct breed and used as one of the breeding lines of the Lapphund, or was merely a different name for essentially the same breed. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 04:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lapland Sheepdog
Talk:A Garland for Linda

message: Look good?
:Just to say that I saw the "muic".... but I'm not telling!LessHeard vanU 20:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good?

message: I found :Image:Agarlandforlinda.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:Agarlandforlinda.jpg]]

message: :Image:Agarlandforlinda.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Agarlandforlinda.jpg
Talk:Istrian Coarse-haired Hound

message: In the begining paragraph, it says the dog is from Croatia, but in the box it says Slovenia.....so confusing,,,which is it?--Jesuislafete 20:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After some thorough checking, I have removed the copyvio tag placed on this article, which pointed to http://caninecoalition.com/dog-breeds/Istarski-Ostrodlaki-Gonic.  This article hasn't changed much since it was first put on the web in '05, but it has changed a little, and the other website is a copy of a more-recent-than-original version of the article.  Also, if you check out the other articles, some of them (this one, for instance) include copies of Wikipedia template tags.  Mangojuicetalk 05:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio note removed
Talk:Threnody (comics)

message: Well, since you brought it up, would you mind helping finish it? I knew she didn't really die, but I haven't read the issues where she makes a reappearance (that's why for the time being I put "supposedly" dies).
Tullyman 06:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help then? 
Talk:CloudSat

message: Question: Working out the figures gives the satellite a footprint of about 4km. This means the satellite can only cover 0.5% of the earth each day - why is this so low? Annihilatenow 20:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're going to put the answer into the article, then I believe we count as "members of the press".  Use the links on  (a "members of the public" link is there too). Simesa 19:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ČZ vz. 27

message: My CZ 27's mostly have a "Modell 27" instead of a Vz 27.  Why isn't it listed under the common name of CZ 27 instead?--Asams10 20:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As it says in the article, "vzor" is Czech for "model" and is its military designation. They were never sold by CZ commercially as a "CZ 27" even though they are commonly known by this incorrect name. BroadArrow 10:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

text: "Modell" is "model" in German, not Czech. Most likely your Vz 27 was made for a German-speaking country and labelled in German. In any case, "Modell" doesn't mean anything in Czech so it wouldn't be part of the Czech name of the pistol. Perhaps the 5,500 surplus Vz 27s sold to the Swiss were remarked in German? Or maybe it was some other contract we don't know about? BroadArrow 09:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't it be "Modell 27" instead?

message: A relative brought back a souvenir CZ-27 from Normandy. It was definitely a 9mm Parabellum (9x19). I also saw a number of used WW2 models for sale in a gunstore, all also 9mm.
Shouldn't this calibre be listed in the article? SmarterAlec (talk) 01:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  9mm model used by Nazi officers
Talk:Kanni

message: The text here is exactly the same as this website: http://www.dogsindia.com/kanni.htm. Which came first and whose work is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.250.212 (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2012 

message: I disagree. --A1b43789erzsd 15:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2007
Talk:Karelian Bear Dog

message: Pictures used in past revisions of this article were much better in showing the shape and appearance of the breed. If the the current pictures must be retained, fine, but the other pictures should be added back. Not to mention that the second picture in this article is just a cropped version of the first. 69.128.153.193 (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity pictures
Talk:Kintamani dog

message: Is this animal a Canis lupus familiaris or a Canis lupus dingo? Readers of this article want to know. Chrisrus (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What subspecies is this? 

message: Can we say that this is definately of the Spitz-type?  If it's not citable, how about under WP:SKYISBLUE? To my mind, it rises to the level in obviousness.  Chrisrus (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spitz 
Talk:Jackson Mendoza

message: The band qualifies per WP:MUSIC as it charted and received significant radio and music TV airplay in Australia & NZ. This article needs references for chart performance in Australia and New Zealand; I relied on a Google post, which isn't sufficient per WP:V guidelines.  --Muchness 20:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More than nine years later... refs now provided for Oz & NZ charting.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability & refs