Talk:Army Nuclear Power Program

message: Hello- I am a veteran of this program (1968-71) and would like to try to organize this material and add extensively to it. A few years ago I had the definitive website on the ANPP (definitive because to my knowledge it was the only one!), and I have tons of material, pics, etc. I also have a copy of the only book on the program, so I can cite that instead of just my own memory. I added a link on this page today to a page with some info on the qualification badges we had. I still have my CRO badge and have good pics of all of them. That badge page needs a lot of work also. Rb88guy (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ANPP veteran

message: Put the correct qualification criteria there; what was there was wrong. Added a couple of badge pics. That page needs to be merged into an improved version of this one. Rb88guy (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed up badge page

message: This will take much more work, but I added a few words on the NPPOC, and added a pic of the USAERG letterhead. Rb88guy (talk) 02:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a bit on NPPO training

message: Trying to add info and organize it better. Not done yet, this will take a few iterations. I have lots of pics of the plants and would like to find a way to get them incorporated here. Rb88guy (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ANPP guy making lots of edits

message: Add section on nuclear-powered fuel depot; made qualifs into subsections. I have an original of the Briefing Book; my faculty advisor in grad school was in the Ad Hoc Study Group, and he gave this document to me while cleaning out old files. I've kept it for some 30 years. I'll be extracting lots of material from it. Rb88guy (talk) 01:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More edits; deleted stub

message: in galleries. Still need to add some more general discussion and cite Suid a zillion times. There really isn't much else to cite, other than the briefing book, which no one can get to. Moved a few things around also.  Rb88guy (talk) 20:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added lots of pics

message: Uranium-235 at 93% enrichment? That's above weapons grade material. – Conrad T. Pino (talk) 03:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 93% HEU was a standard enrichment level in the 50s/60s, used in a lot of applications, such as research reactors (and submarine reactors I think) - so very plausible for Army reactor use use. In 1967 it cost $11.188/gram on the United States Atomic Energy Commission price list. Rwendland (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons Grade Fuel 

message: There was the Dalat facility and the US had both nuclear powered and nuclear armed ships in Vietnamese waters.
See DOE reveals Vietnam plutonium mistake. 
and also US Almost Blew Up A Nuclear Plant in Vietnam Johnvr4 (talk) 04:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rejection of anything nuclear in Vietnam" statement 

message: Shouldn't the SM-1 photo gallery be at SM-1, with a link to it from here? Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SM-1 gallery 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Army Nuclear Power Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109040549/http://usace.army.mil/PPS/Pages/PPSHistory.aspx to http://www.usace.army.mil/PPS/Pages/PPSHistory.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Army Nuclear Power Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807212441/http://www.inl.gov/proving-the-principle/chapter_15.pdf to http://www.inl.gov/proving-the-principle/chapter_15.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the article under the section talking about reactor PM-2A, in the sentence: "It was used to provide power to a colear launch facility." The word "colear" doesn't make sense to me. Is it misspelled? I looked up the word and the definition on Wiktionary says is that it means "to wiggle." I think it would be helpful to elaborate on the meaning of that sentence to remove any ambiguity. In my opinion the word "covert" would go in that spot. I also do not have access to the referenced article to learn about the context. -- Ubh [talk... contribs...] 08:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word 'colear' has an unclear meaning 

message: I removed an irrelevant citation to a journal article on catnip, and a bot put it back. How do I remove the citation properly? Isoboroff (talk) 11:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catnip cite