lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Changshan

message: Both pictures in this article are large group shots: one is an old black-and-white photograph set against a busy background, and the other displays the changshan largely from the back and features a man in a Western suit front and center. A single, high quality image showing a single person modeling a changshan against a neutral background would greatly improve this article. -12:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Defense in depth (computing)

message: Luis F. Gonzalez 22:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Just started this stub

message: I merged Defense in Depth to this page, and created a disambiguation page at the former. I felt this was the right move because Defense in Depth was describing the computer security term, not the military term, though they're rather intertwined. A redirect felt out of place, as it isn't obvious what someone searching for "defense in depth" really wants to see. I just want to make sure everyone is okay with this. -FrankTobia (talk) 06:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Defense in Depth]] 

message: I noticed that a user recently removed a  tag, for good reason I believe. However we should note that this article has no sources. I am not a computer security expert, and I would feel more comfortable if there was at least once authoritative source to be had.  Can anyone either dig one up, or point me in the right direction? -FrankTobia (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Writing Secure Code", by Michael Howard and David LeBlanc, Microsoft Press (the second edition is current, but I have the first), has a one-page write-up on Defense in Depth.  --MattiasAndersson (talk) 22:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: The website http://www2.sea.siemens.com/Products/Process-Automation/safetyandsecurity/industrialsecurity/Process-Automation-SafetyandSecurity_Security.htm?languagecode=en has links and discussion of Defense in Depth for process control  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shloshed (talk • contribs) 01:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: links

message: I've never been paid to do IT, so take this outsider's comment with requisite salt, but: How are "routers and switches" considered a security strategy? If someone clueful agrees with me and removes that line from the article, feel free to remove this comment too, to declutter the talk page. Myself248 (talk) 22:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Routers and switches? 

message: There's no date on the linked PDF file, but it does reference earlier work in September of 2000. Surely this isn't the first conception of Defense in Depth as an IT best practice? Perhaps it was already known but under another name and NSA coined this term for an existing practice. Can someone show prior art? -- 24.7.80.209 (talk) 11:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did NSA really invent this?
Talk:Barbara Strozzi

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 21:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I have cut "Strozzi is unique among both male and female composers for publishing her works in single-composer volumes, rather than in collections" which was uncited and clearly untrue as written.  As I have no access to the sources, I cannot check what might have been meant.  Perhaps missing "in 17th century Venice"?  She certainly wasn't even the only female baroque composer to publish in this way - eg see Élisabeth Jacquet de La Guerre. Davidships (talk) 21:24, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniqueness as a publisher

message: ' Strozzi was highly sensitive to the subliminal meaning in her texts, and, as is the case with Arcangela Tarabotti, the texts she set often hinted at underlying issues regarding gender.'
Citation to support this assertion, please. 121.44.29.41 (talk) 22:51, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation please 

message: — Assignment last updated by Christopherbowers176 (talk) 20:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Public Musicology
Talk:Let's Go (1976 TV series)

message: I loved this show! I used to think how cool it would be to be on it with the other kids.
I've searched and searched and cannot find any episodes posted on the internet at all.
Can we get CKY to post the shows on a website somewhere? Perhaps on YouTube? Maybe somewhere better?
I'm thinking no one else remembers this show as there's basically nothing to be found on it.
Please post some episodes - or put out a DVD!
Thanks,
blinca  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.23.221 (talk) 07:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

message: Posting song lyrics is against Wikipedia policy as it violates copyright, so I have deleted them. 23skidoo 22:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song lyrics deleted
Talk:Isabella Leonarda

message: I deleted "Only two Italian women are known to have made contributions to instrumental music, each of them publishing only one collection in this field. Leonarda's Opus 16 is one of these two collections, the other being a composition by Marieta Morosina Priuli." from the compositions section because I felt it was too broad of a statement to be wholly accurate. The problem is that many Italian women have contributed to instrumental music in general, and the statement doesn't tell me if it is in a specific field, etc. I haven't read the original source cited, but I feel like it is a good fact if more properly qualified or given more detail. 
NotAryaStark (talk) 21:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Élisabeth Jacquet de La Guerre

message: I have a couple of questions about the composer's name. For starters, is it Élisabeth or Elisabeth? I know that several other Wikipedias use the former spelling, but I have yet to see a single book or encyclopedia to do so. Also, where does the "-Claude" bit come in? Again, it seems like very few sources use this variant of her name; is it an official thing for late 17th century France, or just an optional indication of her father's name? --Jashiin (talk) 09:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The redirect Elisabeth-Claude (c. 1666– Jacquet de la Guerre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 00:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Elisabeth-Claude (c. 1666– Jacquet de la Guerre]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Elisabeth-Claude (c. 1666- Jacquet de la Guerre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 00:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Elisabeth-Claude (c. 1666- Jacquet de la Guerre]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Michael of Cesena

message: This sentence is very misleading and thus liable to misinterpretation: "He was an advocate of ecclesiastical poverty, in which dispute he found himself ranged against Pope John XXII."  In fact, Michael, as Minister-General, opposed certain bulls which John XXII promulgated concerning (1) the nature of the absolute poverty of Christ and the Apostles, and (2) John's interpretation of Franciscan (i.e., "evangelical") poverty.  I'm not sure what "ecclesiastical poverty" is supposed to mean, but one might interpret this as meaning Michael advocated the disendowment of the Church.  --67.70.89.238 22:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2006 Michigan State vs. Northwestern football game

message: I did a major overhaul of this page, adding links. As a result I removed the linkless tag; if the work is still not sufficient please let me know. Theirishpianist 22:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nevada vs Weber State was not bigger, how many unanswered points doesn't matter. They both overcame 35 point deficits. The difference is MSU vs Northwestern was the largest comeback in NCAA Division 1-A history, while Nevada vs Weber State is the largest comeback in NCAA Division 1-AA history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkspartan1 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "The biggest" implies it is the only comeback of its magnitude. But if you want to qualify by division, I'm happy to to see that in article. Krychek (talk) 19:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest Comeback In NCAA History
Talk:Panic Disorder

message: Do not Merge Panic Attacks should not be merged with Panic Disorder for the reasons listed below but also becasue there three charateristic types of panic attacks: unexpected, situationally bound, and situationally predisposed.  Each type of panic attack is defined by a different set of relationships between the onset of the attack and the presence or absence of situational triggers that can include cues that are either external or internal. A diagnosis of Panic disorder necessitates unexpected attacks although it can include situational attacks.  However, this does not indicate an exclusive realtionship.  For example, consider a woman who has a panic attack prior to a public speaking announcement.  If this woman states that the focus of her anxiety was an impending heart attack then the diagnosis of Panic Disorder might be made.  However, if this woman identifies the focus of her anxiety with being embarrassed and humiliated than she is more likely to have Social Phobia.  Therefore, it is no more appropriate to merge panic attack with panic disorder than panic attack with social phobia. 202.52.249.251 10:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Hello32020 2

message: User:Hello32020
Category:	2
Image:	75
Mainspace	3083
Portal:	240
Talk:	202
Template talk:	3
Template:	10
User talk:	1185
User:	94
Wikipedia talk:	5
Wikipedia:	816
avg edits per article	1.51
earliest	00:42, 12 July 2006
number of unique articles	3779
total	5715
Hello32020's editcount summary stats as of 22:45, November 17th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 22:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Legal proceeding

message: * lawsuit (in its current form) is used as a synonym for 'civil trial', on the discussion page someone took issue that lawsuit could mean more than just civil trial
* 'legal proceedings' definitely means more than just 'civil trial' 
* 'legal proceedings' should therefore point to more than just lawsuit (even if you interpret lawsuit to mean more than just civil trial). Because of this, I have attempted to change legal proceedings from a redirect to 'lawsuit' into a disambiguation page to all sorts of legal proceedings. dr.ef.tymac 22:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: DONE: legal proceedings now a disambiguation page for various categories of legal and legislative proceedings. dr.ef.tymac 10:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  legal proceedings was a redirect to "lawsuit" ... this is a slight problem
Talk:Allihn condenser

message: I wonder if this piece of glassware is named after Felix Richard Allihn? Japanese Wikipedia seems to have an article containing his name...I wonder if we can figure out whether :ja:アリーン冷却器 is the same thing as this article? The links suggests this might be the case. --HappyCamper 00:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't speak Japanese but this document as well as a few others obtained from googling "Felix Richard Allihn" suggest this to be the case. --Rifleman 82 01:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Tankball

message: suggest merge with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paintball_Tank dreamcatcher23 17:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I placed a merge template on the page. I'll let that stew a while, and in a couple days I shall perform the merge. J-stan Talk 20:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You know what, you had this message posted for a while. I'll go ahead with it. J-stan Talk 22:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:2007 in literature

message: I added subsection headings, since the list tends to get quite long over the course of the year. If we categorize from the start, the list should be easier for readers to review, browse through and search through. Consider it a suggestion, and if you disagree, please discuss.Noroton 22:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsections for Books published this year?

message: Currently, the following can be found under the heading Literature:
* Ragged Islands by Don Hannah
* A Thousand Splendid Suns (May 22), by Khaled Hosseini
* Falling Man (May 15), by Don DeLillo
* The Yiddish Policemen's Union (May 1), by Michael Chabon
* On Chesil Beach (June), by Ian McEwan
* Then We Came to the End by Joshua Ferris
* Moloka'i Nui Ahina, Summers on the Lonely Isle by Kirby Wright
I don't know if some new kind of system is at work here or if this seemingly random order is due to sloppy editing. Can anyone enlighten me? <KF> 19:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no answer after so many months. It seems no one cares, so I'm going to reorder the entries alphabetically and leave out the month of publication as that seems irrelevant to me. <KF> 19:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetical order? Chronological order? Random order? 

message: Since the publishing date for this book has been pushed to 2008, I moved it to that page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snafu25 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Dance With Dragon
Talk:Infrabel

message: This page was intended to link to the existing French/Dutch language pages about Infrabel (or to contain some english language content containing the same info as them). I don't seem to have managed to make the links to the foreign Wikis work properly though.
Update:
More content now added along with fixing the links.
Railwayfan2005 23:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Molera

message: In my opinion, this article is unnecessary. Its two paragraphs could easily be incorporated into the main Chihuahua article. What do you think? DutchmanInDisguise (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Эта статья нужна. Так как согласно европейскому стандарту чихуахуа FCI от 04.10.2019 №218 был объявлен запрет на "открытый родничок". А этот признак исторически у породы считался породным. Много обсуждений и споров по этому вопросов до сих пор. Нужны официальные источники. 80.91.26.145 (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article ''really'' necessary?
Talk:Ashot I of Armenia

message: Bagratuni Dynasty, Medieval Armenia and (indirectly) Template:History of Armenia all give 861, not 862, for the year when Ashot was recognised as prince of princes by the Abbasid caliph. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Super late response, but I'm currently translating this article from the featured article on the French Wikipedia, which lists it at 862. I'll look into this further. – TCMemoire 20:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The death of Ashot I is described in Hovhannes Draskhanakertts'i's History of Armenia (p. 130), which tells of Ashot dying of natural causes. This is most likely as this is coming from a contemporary of the times. Whence this story of Ashot being killed on the battlefield, at such an advanced age and in the arms of the Catholicos no less, is beyond me, but I have a feeling I have to take a look at Grousset's volume and find what, if any, sources he cited to support such a statement.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Ashot II of Armenia

message: The source the picture is from simply refers to the illustration as "Ashod" right next to a page that mostly talks about Ashot I, but leaves out the Roman numeral, just like in the caption. Page 68 shows the author using Roman numerals in the caption of a picture of Leo VII, so perhaps the reason he did not for this image is because it is of Ashot I, not Ashot II? --Steverci (talk) 18:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I didn't think much of it, but for an individual remembered as the "Iron King" it makes for a very depressing portrait and that's why I would think this is Ashot I, rather than Ashot II, though even the former did not quite run into any failures during his reign as king. I'd support removing it.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 20:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The portrait doesn't strike me as depressing, I feel it has more of a tired feeling. Actually, it just occurred to me how old the king appears. Ashot I was 64 when he became king, and Ashot II was probably in-between 30-40. I think this further proves it is Ashot I. --Steverci (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

text: By the way do you have any idea who/what the coin drawings on the next page are depicting? --Steverci (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Armenian inscribed on the coin writes, "Het'um, King of the Armenians," which is probably a reference to either King Hethoum I or Hethoum II, kings of Cilician Armenia.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashot I in the picture?
Talk:Origin of the Bagratid dynasties

message: there are lots of uncleared meanings. and if you want to call bagratids armenians that u must paste any source were is said that bagratids were Armenians. i have edited page, and also i made a relible source from  Fordham University library. everything what is written is sourced from there, DO NOT REEDIT or i will contact to administrator.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArsA-92 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now a source, and a very reliable one. Sardur (talk) 16:58, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

text: where is source? ther is not any, if u reedit it again i will make admin to block u.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoFR (talk • contribs) 13:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: why do u revert my edites? i made almost 13 reliable sources. do not reedit it again  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gergea1 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources
Talk:Perineal hernia

message: I have tagged the article for cleanup.  Contrary to the lead, perineal hernias are seen not only in dogs, but also in other animals.  The article already mentions cats.  Humans require mention also. --Una Smith (talk) 15:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you don't mind, I made the tag a little more specific.  I don't know anything about the condition in humans and wouldn't feel qualified to expand it.  --Joelmills (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. --Una Smith (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup: Broader context

message: There are several techniques of surgical repair used in humans.  What about in dogs?  --Una Smith (talk) 18:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Several also.  I've never done one myself, but I have seen a couple.  I can add a brief summary of surgeries to the article.  --Joelmills (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better now.  I've removed the "generalize" tag. --Una Smith (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Repair
Talk:Mediæval Bæbes

message: What is sung before these lyrics start? There's more to this song, but I don't speak Cornish, so I don't know how to write it. It sounds like: ith sumu noth in fagan dwys gothres nay be in sum a sees agan tas-ny us yn nef..  Thanks!  --JamesR1701E 23:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 2023 album "Tales of Love and Loss" is a remix of various previously-released tracks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.229.93 (talk) 11:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Tales of Love and Loss
Talk:Progressive retinal atrophy

message: Retinal degeneration redirects to Progressive retinal atrophy, an exclusively dog-oriented article.  Retinal degeneration is clearly a human condition too so this redirect is not correct.   N2e (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to take over that redirect - you can put a for the disease in dogs, see progressive retinal atrophy at the top.  --Joelmills (talk) 02:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a disambig page for Retinal degeneration.  Check it out and fine tune it if you wish.  I put the human retinal issues at the top to give the article a more worldwide viewpoint.  N2e (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Retinal degeneration is human too
Talk:Pseudorabies

message: 18:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming this guy is able to claim that because he's a veterinarian and saw this. The reference looks reliable enough to me. White Arabian Filly Neigh 20:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspect information 
Talk:Karl Taro Greenfeld

message: I noticed that the link attached to his novel Standard Deviations: Growing Up and Coming Down in the New Asia is to the mathematical concept Standard deviation. Has anyone read the novel in order to know if this is actually useful? What is Wikipedia protocol in situations like this?
Mr Underhill (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 16:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question about internal links
Category talk:Railway infrastructure companies

message: I want to add foreign companies to this category. How do I do this efficiently. simply adding category entries to the foreign pages seems to create the category on the foreign Wiki, not direct back to here. I guess my syntax is wrong...
Railwayfan2005 23:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Help:Category for more information about how categories work. Slambo (Speak) 11:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding to the category
Talk:Salmon poisoning disease

message: Seems the Nanophyetus salmincola entry goes over all the material in this entry, only better. I don't know what the current practice is in scientific articles, but I think it should be discussed, since this seems to just be a redundant content fork. - CompliantDrone (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or redirect to [[Nanophyetus salmincola]]?
Talk:Scotty Cramp

message: This sounds like stringhalt in horses. Are they related? --Una Smith 03:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They both can cause overflexion of the joints, and I think they are both considered a peripheral neuropathy, but the cause appears to be different.  Also, scotty cramp is inherited, but I don't think that is true of stringhalt.  --Joelmills 04:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This
Talk:Tibial-plateau-leveling osteotomy

message: Added this reference, "Is Surgery Really Necessary For Your Dog's ACL / CCL Ligament Injury?" due to concerns that canine osteotomy for ACL or other cruciate ligaments are not well studied. There is the possibility that the "common wisdom" of "90%" improve after this surgical treatment is based on very poor anecdotal reports and no actual controlled studies.
I have (yet) no opinion on the validity of this criticism except to engage in further careful research on my own.
Admittedly, I just paid a significant amount for a TPLO (on my granddaughter's Golden Retriever) without doing sufficient research.
It bears investigation.  HerbM (talk) 16:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)