Talk:Professional diving

message: I'd say keep them separate. Neither article is that great but they are about significantly different things: Commercial Diving is a highly specialised operation which needs a separate page, but the Underwater diving page is just a general introduction to the whole topic of diving - be it SCUBA, free-diving, commercial or however else. Definitely keep them separate - but cleaning them both up and expanding would be good. If you get time before me then please do it! Iancaddy 00:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to all of Iancaddy's arguments. Heinrich L. 19:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I also strongly oppose the merge.  This article contains a lot of information specific to commercial diving.  The majority of scuba divers are recreational for whom the introductory material on Underwater diving is appropriate.  Viv Hamilton 12:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Man, that hazmat diving sounds just wonderful. I can't possibly imagine welding something inside a live septic tank. Now that should definitely be on the discovery channel's world's dirtiest jobs.
LOL,Yeah that would be A shaty job!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.153.2.146 (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: Referring to this line in the article: 
"The US NEDU was responsible for much of the early experimental diving work to calculate decompression tables..." 
Any sources to back that claim up? The Royal Navy were already working on refining decompression tables for their air divers before the US Navy had even set a personal standard for their diving equipment. Even the US Navy diving page cited below it mentions simply "refining" Haldane's tables of 1904. --UD75 14:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Decompression Tables

message: I think this article is possibly B-class, but certainly a very good C-class. It should be capable of meeting GA criteria with a little work. --RexxS (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Class 

message: Some new some sub-headings have been added to the section entitled 'International commercial diving operations and organisations'.  As the new content looks like spam, I would suggest renaming the section heading in order to discourage its use as a business directory.Cowdy001 (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I have changed the header to be  more descriptive of the intended content, but it is a bit verbose. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section re 'International commercial diving operations and organisations' 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Professional diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161104080007/http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_reg/ohasa85o1993rangnr41716/ to http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_reg/ohasa85o1993rangnr41716/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified