Talk:Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi

message: Although widely cited as planted in 288 BC, there is no way that the tree in this photo is over 2290 years old; Ficus religiosa is a fast-growing tree, and a specimen with this diameter trunk won't be more than two or three hundred years old. Compare this specimen (below) planted in the Foster Botanical Gardens, Hawaii, nearly as stout but only 150 years old at most.
A clue lies in the UNESCO report which points out that the site "was abandoned after an invasion in 993. Hidden away in dense jungle for many years" – more than plenty of time for the original tree to die and be replaced by its offspring, without anyone being aware of the change.
Seems to be one of those unfortunate cases where the 'official' line of its age preferred by the local religious and/or tourism authorities has to be followed (WP:NOR) until someone publishes a detailed scientific analysis of its age. If anyone knows of such a study, please add the details. - MPF 13:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would seem to me that the above constitutes original research, and the majority of external descriptions would contradict such research. What do you propose doing? ... aa:talk 04:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I meant, and why I've not added it to the article. What I propose doing? - wait until someone publishes some better verified info on the tree. - MPF 14:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious age

message: I did this because the date (249 BC) conflicts with the date cited elsewhere (288 BC).  I didn't just delete it or change it because it seems to be an integrated part of a chunk of good information (it was planted on a terrace that was of a certain height with railings...)  I don't know where that info comes from, though, and I can't say for certain that in 288 BC, it was planted on that specific terrace, etc. M-1 (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marked History section as unreferenced section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.dailynews.lk/2009/12/01/fea24.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041027085816/http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/04/25/fea06.html to http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/04/25/fea06.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413143127/http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2011/07/03/spe01.asp to http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2011/07/03/spe01.asp
*Added  tag to http://cbs.ntu.edu.tw/bodhitree/en/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified