Talk:Double Indemnity

message: I don't see how this could ever fit in but there is a nice comment in Some Dreamers of a Golden Dream which appears in Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion (Joan Didion 1968 ), she is describing the San Bernardino valley, east of San Francisco and says:
:"This is the country in which a belief in the literal interpretation of Genisis has slipped impercerceptiby into a belief in the literal interpretation of Double Indemnity . . ."—Preceding unsigned comment added by Notjim (talk • contribs) 22:47, 13 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Three of a Kind" not the title of a single novella, but the title of the collection of three novellas which contained the original Double Indemnity, so I've changed the writing credits here to reflect that.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.227.211 (talk) 03:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing credits

message: I thought I remembered having this discussion before, but perhaps I'm suffering from deja vu. The closest thing I have really found from what seemed to be a credible source was him saying that it was "Billy Wilder's best movie... practically anybody's best movie."  Other than that, it has been shown on IMDB and rotton tomatoes, and I don't know how reliable those are. I am yet to find a primary source though. I'll keep checking. --LV (Dark Mark) 19:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Woody Allen's greatest.

message: I have removed the section title "Elements of film noir" as it is entirely unsourced and original research. Do not readd this to the article without citing sources. The content removed is as follows: - kollision (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Elements of film noir" section removed

message: I have removed the section titled "Remake" as it is entirely unsourced and original research. Do not readd this to the article without citing sources. It is still there, albeit as an invisible note. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 05:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Remake" section removed...

message: Does anyone know why Victor Schertzinger is given a "Music by" credit for this film? Everything I have read does not list him as having anything to do with this picture. In addition, he died in 1941, two years before it even went into production. The only other person I have seen connected with the music for Double Indemnity is Cesar Franck as the composer for some of the underlying music used by Rozsa in composing the score. I will be doing some more research for a music section in the article and see if his name pops up, but for now I am going to remove him unless somebody has a credible source for his inclusion.Dohhh22 (talk) 14:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it was added due to Schertzinger being a composer for a song called "Tangerine" which was apparently used in the film, according to IMDb. That, however, does not entitled him to a "Music by" credit in the infobox so you were right to removed it from the infobox. - Kollision (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see it now. The song was actually playing on the radio at the Dietrichson house. Definitely not a "music by" credit. Thanks for the input.Dohhh22 (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Victor Schertzinger

message: :Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
*—Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik (talk • contribs) 17:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks!Trumpetrep (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: References to use

message: The article, as written, claims "This was, however, the depth of the Red Scare in Hollywood and Guild members rejected the socialist notion and ran from the attempt.Muller, p. 59"
Surely the "depth of the Red Scare" and the referenced McCarthyism was in the 1950s, during the so-called Army/McCarthy Hearings.
Few even knew who McCarthy was in early summer of 1946, when Cain proposed the American Writers Authority; McCarthy was not even seated in the Senate until the following year. In addition, American relations with the Soviet Union were still fairly good if not excellent in June 1946; the war, after all, had been over for less than a year. Stalin had not yet installed Communist governments in the countries he had occupied as a result of the War, the Russians did not yet have the bomb, Masaryk had not yet been defenestrated, the blockade of West Berlin had not been instituted, China had not yet been "lost;" in short, none of the things which historians often (usually?) argue caused the American public to so deeply fear and mistrust Soviet Communism had happened yet.
In addition, it is misleading to speak of "the Red Scare" as though there was only one; for example, there was a big "Bolshevism Scare" in America in the nineteen twenties (The Wall Street Bombing, Sacco and Vanzetti, etc.) 
On the other hand, the Wikipedia article on the American Writers Association makes it clear that the specter of Soviet Communism was freely used in arguments against James M. Cain's idea for the Writers Authority. And there can be little doubt that nascent post-war anti-Communism did play a role in McCarthy's victory over Robert Lafollette Jr., and was otherwise stirring in 1946.
Therefore, propose changing the language in question to something along the lines of "However, there was a persistent element of anti-Communism in Hollywood, even in the afterglow of US/Soviet cooperation in the recent war effort (this element would shortly play a role in the  Post-WW II Red Scare), and Guild members rejected the idea as "socialist" and ran from the attempt," and will do so in a few days if no one objects.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.72.24 (talk) 01:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the language is very unclear, and the cited source contains nothing to support the idea that the Red Scare was to blame. Will look for sources.Trumpetrep (talk) 04:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronism about Red Scare and American Writers Authority 

message: The plot has a number of errors in it. It makes me wonder if the writer of the plot actually watched the film.
For example, Neff was not aware of Ms. Dietrichson's plans until the second time they meet, which is in her home, not at his office. This is an important plot point; it establishes that, despite his years as an insurance salesman, he is still somewhat naive. William J Bean (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm responsible for a good chunk of the latest version of the plot. The synopsis makes it clear that Neff told her he wanted no part of what he guessed were her plans at her home, not at his office. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Double Indemnity (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.imdb.com/name/nm/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2008/11/sex-death-and-a.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917183507/http://audio-classics.com/lthescreenguildtheater.html to http://www.audio-classics.com/lthescreenguildtheater.html
*Added  tag to http://ia700508.us.archive.org/0/items/ScreenGuildTheater/Sgt_45-03-05_ep235_Double_Indemnity.mp3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Double Indemnity (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419164424/http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/07/45/sam-newfield.html to http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/07/45/sam-newfield.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: there's a section in 'release' about the "most important words in motion-picture history", relating to wilder's ad in the trade papers & selznick's reaction to being mimicked, then in the 'reviews' section beneath, we read that hitchcock wrote to wilder using a similar construction, presumably a humorous call-back to this. 
wouldn't it make more sense if the hitchcock story was alongside the selznick anecdote in the 'release' section? it's not clear that it was a 'review', as such, if it was in a letter to wilder, & in any case, it is obviously a reference to the trade ads taken out by selznick.
duncanrmi (talk) 20:46, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggested tiny edit 

message: I walked past downtown Los Angeles's Bradbury Building this weekend and heard a tour guide concluding a speech with the "fact" that the opening and closing scenes of Double Indemnity are set or shot in the Bradbury Building, which made me wince in the same way I do when I read it on Wikipedia or the sources usually claimed, like tourist blogs, or, I think perhaps the source prime source of the concept, a 1990s LA Times article.  Actual close viewing of the movie will show that this is not the case (not did Wilder/the studio ever claim such).
Fred MacMurray's insurance agent character works in an office building on Olive Street (they say so by name in the final scene, and when they have a meeting with the boss you can see the Security Building across Pershing Square in his window). His building has a separate lobby (opening scene), then an elevator lobby of only one story (with visible ceiling) that then goes from two doors into a larger atrium of offices surrounding a central typing pool. 
This is a set that was inspired by Paramount's corporate parent headquarters in New York City. I believe MacMurray's office being placed on Olive at the south end of Pershing Square is intentional, because it's the home of the Pacific Mutual insurance complex, which would have been well known as a landmark in that business in central Los Angeles at the time. 
https://calisphere.org/item/0adad9be01b5966d1738d2c3589e8c54/
https://dtla-weekly.com/monuments-time-pacific-mutual-life-insurance-building/
That first shot when he does out into the open plan does resemble the Bradbury's interior briefly, but it's more rectangular, much larger, only two stories, and does not contain the Bradbury's distinctive iron pipework and elevators.   
Looking at the office pool sets in the actual movie demonstrates the dissimilarity to the Bradbury. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r_jjQ_idz8  (about 1:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41brxmagh3A. (around 8:50) 2603:8000:C003:AA29:8DF7:AC85:4391:B8D2 (talk) 02:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bradbury Building 

message: There are excellent sources for this article, but they are used and cited in a shambolic format. Content is repeated, sometimes in different sections. The same source is given different reference names.  The result is thousands of characters of bloat on the article, and some extremely clumsy prose. I am cleaning things up. There were 103 footnotes when I started. Just by eliminating the duplicate citations, I've whittled that down to 69. Any help would be great. Trumpetrep (talk) 04:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is now down to 50 citations and has been trimmed from 73k bytes to 50k. I've streamlined a lot of the diversions in the text, and eliminated a great deal of material that belongs elsewhere.Trumpetrep (talk) 06:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources & Citations