Talk:Ben Ferguson

message: Do NOT revert my edits to continue vandalizing this page. Bamafader (talk) 07:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: User: Bittyrock

message: I a removing the "controversy" section for very obvious reasons. I won't be replacing it with anything because it is the entire "controversy" section, so there is nothing to put in it's place.
Bamafader (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this?

message: :Image:Ben Ferguson Book Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ben Ferguson Book Cover.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ben Ferguson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714072102/http://memphisnewsblog.com/2009/08/ec-jones-sharon-webb-ben-ferguson-pull-petitions-for-mayors-race.html to http://memphisnewsblog.com/2009/08/ec-jones-sharon-webb-ben-ferguson-pull-petitions-for-mayors-race.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216032819/http://www.radioink.com/Article.asp?id=1501935&spid=24698 to http://www.radioink.com/Article.asp?id=1501935&spid=24698
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: he's back in memphis and restarted the 4-7 ben ferguson show and has been here for over a year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3C2:8102:8B30:B93D:AF18:5A32:EEB (talk) 15:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  major updates needed.  

message: Obviously, a guy like this lives or dies by publicity, so surely this page is a dreamboat for him. Is thus conceivable that his mother (or somebody) created this page, watches this page and/or etc.
I'm not enough of a wikipedia nerd to bother much here.
But very quick Google search turned up almost nothing about Ferguson except this page, and some pages that are controlled by Ben Ferguson. Obviously, a guy like this lives or dies by publicity, so surely this page is a dreamboat for him.
Apparently he buys time for his radio show on a number of local stations around the country. Presumably he tries to sell his own advertising. It's nearly impossible to tell how successful he is via a brief internet search, nor why he chose this model.
I searched the Fox News page and got one reference in past year. All the other stuff was at least six  years old. Dunno about CNN.
38.131.227.140 (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete this?