lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brewster McCloud

message: Needs less trivia and more actual discussion of the movie. AnonMoos 15:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Seems odd, to say the least, to see a grand total of one line discussing the plot of the film, while a section exists detailing license plates which appear on the film(!). Canada Jack (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree; this is ridiculous as a discussion of the movie. At some point, every movie shot on location will become an historic document; this is not unique and the discussion is not about the film.  Will remove the trivia - that can be the subject of someone's blog or something; it doesn't belong here.  Perhaps someoe can find sources and use it for an article on historic Houston. Parkwells (talk) 15:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Huh? Suzanne, does not drive the, "AMC Gremlin"! Louise, does! Suzanne, drives what looks to me like a, "Plymouth Roadrunner"!
By the way, according to the movie's summary, Louise, is his guardian angel.
It is like the article was written by someone that didn't actually view the movie. LeoStarDragon1 (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cars!
Talk:The Long Goodbye (film)

message: …smacks of POV or original research; that Marlowe smokes is to highlight the fact that he is a character out of time, as it is a noir trope, so of necessity the other characters don’t - but not because they are health-conscious. If they were, the film wouldn’t take place in the world of detox and health clinics… It’s a style of the film, not a depiction of the milieu. Jock123 (talk) 16:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment about “health concious” California…
Talk:A Wedding (1978 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: A Wedding →  – There are a number of other articles with the same title with similar or higher number of views, i.e. A Wedding (Glee). Inwind (talk) 11:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 August 2020
Talk:Charles Thomas Pearce

message: Yeah! I wish you pharma boys would give up this game of attacking vaccine critics. john 09:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But now we can fill up the articles with anti-vaccine critic propaganda!!! WOO!!--CDN99 12:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Beats watching TV! All propaganda is a lie, by the way. Truth is what we are into. john 10:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: so should the journal be in the list of med journals, or the list of defunct med journals?  
And, what was the _other_ thing about him?
Midgley 17:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: and the journal, and his life?  Midgley 22:31, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical Journal Editor 

message: ", making the town a centre of resistance to the compulsory vaccination law".   Midgley 18:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  central to an argument?
Talk:Come Back to the 5 & Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean (film)

message: The plot section is rambling and unfocused. It would be better to summarize the plot than to switch from character to character every sentence. Yoninah (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the IP's edits in June 2020. Yoninah (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot section
Talk:Tanner '88

message: I believe Tanner was referenced as President of the United States in the second edition of the role-playing game Twilight:2000 published in 1990. Sadly I don't have a copy available so can't verify. For what it is worth it might be worth noting, assuming it can be verified. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.9.154.243 (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tanner in RPG Twilight:2000
Talk:Scarecrow (1973 film)

message: Re: Scarecrow, the film is much more than a drifter/Steinbeck story.
It is pure conflict between mind-soul; head & heart.
Lion falls into catatonia after the shock sinks in he is not a dad and his punishing 5 naval years of service paid for nothing he'd hoped it would. Max falls too; his dreams dashed of being a business success; he had no control over his cold, hard core that couldn't protect him from lion's uncontrollable & unstoppable fall.
Both men are a Greek Tragedy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:8D80:1399:B59D:ECE6:6BCF:AB2F:D9E (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scarecrow (1973 film) (film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 19:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scarecrow (1973 film) (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Terror (1963 film)

message: The cast list should ideally summarize the identity of each character.
Steve Wise (talk) 02:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Gustaf?
Talk:Café Scientifique

message: If someone would like to determine the exact number of active cafés, I recommend the following google searches:  for british council organised ones, and  for US, Canada, possibly Australia, and elsewhere. I also have a suspicion that the New Scientist has listings of these in its print edition.
I've taken out from the article the following list that I verified on the web:
: such as Australia, Canada and the United States (e.g. Palo Alto, Colorado, San Diego, Boston, Pittsburgh, Muskegon (MI); Tokyo, Singapore, Buenos Aires; Slovenia).
IIRC Singapore, Buenos Aires and Slovenia were British Council ones. - Samsara 23:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The comprehensive list?

message: Since Royal Society events are not organised by lay people, they are not really within the scope of this article. Thanks for keeping them out.
Any venture that is at organised by lay people in at least some localities, and includes open discussion as well as a friendly atmosphere, especially when held in a cafe or bar, qualifies. Please note that a number of organisations have adopted the term, Cafe Scientifique, or Science Cafe, and these therefore need to be included in this article even though they do not fulfill the criteria (and no, I don't believe these are written down anywhere). 82.71.48.158 10:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Society (of Edinburgh or otherwise...) 

message: I guess this emerges frm the salons culture in France and also the coffee houses of lOndon - hence lloyds shipping register. So it is really surprsing that the Green Drinks was not linked (I added it) and even more so no ref to the salons de thé OR EVEN the successor OpenCoffee - 
http://opencoffee.ning.com/
Apparently the usual morons who delete everything that is not happening in the USA or in ENglish have deleted it. Perhaps someone who can be bothered can add these anbd update articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.231.178.239 (talk) 08:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: others

message: I suggest this article is deleted. It seems to be self-promoting an organisation/idea which has vanished - the Cafe Scientifique web site lists no cafes anywhere in the world that I can see, and can't see signs of activity since 2010. If this was ever notable, it isn't now. 84.12.193.153 (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The website lists lots of cafes in the UK, and Cambridge, for one, held a meeting yesterday.-Lindosland (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

text: You are correct that the tone of the article seems somewhat self-promotional.  The "philosophy" section, in particular, seems to borrow heavily from Cafe Scientifique's own literature and should be re-writtent in a neutral POV.  --129.105.37.34 (talk) 15:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete article?

message: Quite why is Cockermouth listed here? cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic areas?
Talk:Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992 film)

message: Just read the section on "Themes" which states "Unlike the Stoker novel, Bram Stoker's Dracula explicitly portrays Dracula as the historical Vlad the Impaler or Vlad Țepeș, who ruled intermittently as Voivode of Wallachia between 1448 and his death in 1476/77." Having just finished reading the original Bram Stoker novel I can attest this is incorrect, despite having seen it commonly cited again and again, in plenty of sources (not just this wikipedia entry). It seems as though no one actually reads the novel, because Stoker makes it quite clear that Dracula is the historical Vlad Tepes. On page 256 of the Penguin Classics edition, (Chapter XVIII) Stoker has Van Helsing say, in describing Dracula: "He must, indeed, have been that Voivode Dracula who won his name against the Turk, over the great river on the very frontier of Turkey-land. If it be so, then he was no common man; for in that time, and for centuries after, he was spoken of as the cleverest and the most cunning, as well as the bravest of the sons of the 'land beyond the forest'. That mighty brain and that iron resolution went with him to his grave, and are even now arrayed against us." ['Land beyond the forest' is the literal meaning of 'Transylvania']. Perhaps this reference should be added and the record corrected. 59.102.48.90 (talk) 09:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Themes - Stoker's Dracula is identified as Vlad Tepes in the original novel 

message: An edit yesterday (January 22, 2024) added a redundant second "Themes" heading with a substandard analysis of the movie's possible connection with HIV/AIDS, which is already present in the existing "Themes" heading. Could someone with more experience than me revert this edit? 67.255.243.141 (talk) 22:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The source is a badly broken website that appears to be not much more than a blog. Other sources don't appear to be more reliable with one exception - the New York Times had an article on it back in 1992, but this seems to have been a 'fad' interpretation that didn't really last. Beyond that, this interpretation has also been attached to the book itself, so it's not really specific to the movie. Out it goes absent some compelling argument that would counter WP:UNDUE.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 00:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit re: themes
Talk:My Family (film)

message: How can this 1995 movie be a REMAKE of a movie made in 1999 four years later?  Is this some sort of a wording error?  Should it state that the 1999 Bollywood movie is a remake of this movie? 74.82.68.160 (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake? 
Talk:Jack (1996 film)

message: Is this actual term used in the movie?  According to the wiki-linked article, "Werner syndrome patients exhibit growth retardation, short stature, premature graying of hair, alopecia (hair loss), wrinkling, prematurely aged faces with beaked noses,  ..."  rags (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werner syndrome
Talk:Round Midnight (film)

message: On the title screen of the film itself, the title is given as 'ROUND MIDNIGHT with an apostrophe. The article for the song 'Round Midnight has its apostrophe, maybe this article should have it too. 113.73.125.134 (talk) 12:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophe missing from title 

message: Cheikh Fall... a basket player. Simoneschiaffino (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast
Talk:The Big Shave

message: The page currently says that this was a film he made while at Tisch. Most sources say he graduated from there in 1966. On the one hand there is a lack of citation for the claim it was a student film, on the other there are many articles mentioning that it was a Tisch production, but those articles may have been informed by Wikipedia. Another possibility is that Scorsese produced this in 1967 as an instructor using students as crew. Does anyone know the full story? YouCanDoBetter (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production context
Talk:Who's That Knocking at My Door

message: I read a review (of another film) by Roger Ebert which said that this was the first film to use a soundtrack made up entirely of pop songs. Can anyone confirm that? Cottonshirt (talk) 06:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Scorpio Rising was made in 1963, although that film was much shorter. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack Special
Talk:Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore

message: Was the title of the film inspired by this song, by any chance? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Living Next Door To Alice

message: I removed this section because it mis-characterized “The Simpson’s” as having parodied, in part, the film Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore, when in reality it was simply one joke where the title was referenced in a single line of dialog. I first edited it to make this clarification, but on reflection felt the entry—given it’s weight in the article—was providing a false equivalency of importance. It seems a really trivial usage to merit inclusion in this article, and I notice that a “References in Popular Culture” section was previously removed for having similar entries of trivial nature. If anyone disagrees and wants to restore it, I would be curious to read their argument. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Simpsons
Talk:New York Stories

message: I searched "Life Lessons" and got redirected to a list of Danny Phantom episodes.
Shouldn't there be a disambiguation thing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.96.212.130 (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because that movie is within this series. It's not a link itself. That movie is not a title. This is a series movie (anthology movie) RobertFL1991 (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searching "Life Lessons" 

message: I know the title (New York Stories) isn't due the fact that this had two very adult-orinted movies (one before Life without Zoe and the one after it) that were rife with openly adult subject matters such as divorce and sex (and I believe there's a rape reference in "Life Lessons), and yes PG movies in the mid to late 80s, despite PG-13 being around since 1984, still were like the PG movies of before PG-13, and sometimes borderline like the 70s, given the F-word. But everything about Life Without Zoe is a fuzzy episdoe of Steampipe Alley, a popular WWOR (the station that stomped Tribune's lame WPIX) show. In content. It's family-oriented The warmth and hugs. There isn't any of that rough-natured Spaceballs thing to it (adult content of the PG-13 type, and adult language of the PG-13 or R type), where they actually had F-words, or subject matter like that of "Life Lessons" which is more typical pre-1995 PG movie type stuff. And yes PG as a rating didn't really become a family rating until 1995. Home Alone and Home Alone 2 would be PG-13 today. I believe the "family movie" description is warranted on this page for "Life Without Zoe." RobertFL1991 (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Life Without Zoe" a family movie?
Talk:Cape Fear (1991 film)

message: I think more about Leigh Bowden's fascination with Max needs to be addressed. From my take, she lived a sad life, probably after the affairs. It seems that Max turn her on because he kept beating Sam at every turn. Maybe her attraction to Sam was that he seems like an invincible lawyer. Now this gruff maniac has rattled Sam's cage and made her feel vulnerable. Maybe the though that Cadey could have her at any time got to her. I base this on the scene were she realizes he was wearing lipstick when they went after Cadey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.166.47.172 (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Leigh Bowden's fascination with Max

message: Wouldn't it make sense to not only compare the films, but also the book The Executioners upon which the story is based? --mordicai. (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences
Talk:Kundun

message: Rotten Tomatoes.com shows it received better critical reception than two of Scorcese's last three movies.  It's definitely not a "lesser" work--but nor is there many who say it's his best.  This is a good compromise, and I will work to keep it in.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.185.85.205 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 29 April 2006
:Good edits, whoever you are, thanks! RiseAbove 08:17, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best or Lesser Work? 

message: Its interesting to note that in fact the communists are the imperialist thugs.--Exander 00:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperialists 

message: This movie was released almost simultaneously with Seven_years_in_Tibet, but in that film, the Dalai Lama meets communist Chinese generals in Lhasa, Tibet.  This article speaks of a meeting Beijing (I unfortunately missed that part).  Is this an inaccuracy in one of the two movies?
Evilbu 17:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference with "Seven years in Tibet" concerning the meeting? 

message: I think the article should have a section about how true the film is to actual events. it does say that
:It is based on the life and writings of the Dalai Lama, the exiled political and spiritual leader of Tibet.
but is this enough?80.235.71.160 20:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical accuracy

message: It would be helpful to have a section on the music by Philip Glass.--69.87.203.22 13:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Philip Glass
Talk:No Direction Home

message: I don't want to delete this, but i don't know where to put it. 
The film also showcases important influences on Dylan:
* John Jacob Niles
* Odetta
* Johnnie Ray
* Woody Guthrie
* The Clancy Brothers
* Joan Baez
* Muddy Waters
* Allen Ginsberg
* Pete Seeger
* Dave Van Ronk
* Webb Pierce
* Hank Williams
* Johnny Cash
Chumchum14 (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other info
Talk:Mrinal Sen

message: According to The Indian Express, he is alive and well: Stop the Twitter rumours, Mrinal Sen is absolutely fine, says family. --Silvonen (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still alive 
Talk:Missing (1982 film)

message: What's the (fictional?) name of the General the US ambassador is meeting?  
it sounds like Videla  Vimena or so. Is he Pinochet? Or is it General Lutz?
Who are Herbert Porterfield?  Ray Tower?  Almirante Huidobro (Admiral Huidobro)
set the date to overthrow the elected government to be Tuesday 11th of September.
He attended the notorioius Fort Benning, USA, School of the Americas where many Latino-american
leaders and human rights-violators had been trained.
[more info here].
124.197.1.128 21:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters

message: The phrase "US-backed Chilean coup of 1973" should be reworded, or have the words "US-backed" removed altogether.
It gives the impression of a deeper US involvement than there actually was.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.45.115.4 (talk) 14:48, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  US involvement 

message: The listed budget of $5m conflicts with the Production section, where it's stated as being $9m.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.45.115.4 (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget figures conflict
Talk:When Father Was Away on Business

message: Please do not replace the US release poster for this film with another unknown lesser quality image.  If you can provide a quality version of the actual original film poster please do so instead of uploading a random European release cover and trying to pass it off as the original when it is not.  Thank you. // Laughing Man 18:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If accuracy is the main factor for you, how can you upload an image that you don't know what it is or where it is from? // Laughing Man 17:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  image for infobox 

message: Kusturica considered himself a Yugoslav. Therefore I've changed the original language of the title from Serbian to Serbo-Croatian, closer to what was originally intended.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.175.135 (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 
Talk:Elevator sort

message: I based the information in the article on the following pages:
- the journaling file system page on wikipedia
- http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ldelafosse/Sort/Compare.htm
To verify that it is a sorting algorithm. This is still unsure though (It might be a specific name for any sorting algorithm used in a specific context.). Maybe later, I'll check the source code on that page to give an explanation about the method of elevator sort. Another web site (found using a search engine) said that elevator sort is another name for bubble sort, but I guess the author over there mixed up with exchange sort, which is another name for bubble sort.
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.devel.kernel/8669/match=elevator
Here I found that they order disk operations by increasing block number.--Bernard François 00:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Somebody really needs to verify the information on this page.
The source code on the site mentioned above could be checked to get an idea how elevator sort works.
Maybe an email adres could be found on the latter page, so the people talking about elevator sort can be invited to extend this page, or asked for more information or sources about elevator sort.--Bernard François 00:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future extension
Talk:List of largest empires

message: Hi there I think this article should we renamed, to something like the title of this discussion. Empires is just a very specific political concept. Nsae Comp (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "List of largest historic countries" 

message: This article is protected and I dont want to create an account, so Ill just tell it: the source for the territorial size clearly states it is for Greater Germany, not its whole “empire” (occupied territories) 115.114.30.229 (talk) 23:45, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi Germany
Talk:Ivan's Childhood

message: "Although not regarded as intense or as abstract as any of Tarkovsky's other films, much of his first, while there are fast-paced, visually rich moments to frame the spryness of Ivan's youth, is grating and slow-paced. And yet in every moment, one feels the pressure of inescapable transience bearing down upon a spirit that yearns to be contained in an unchanging paradigm."
Okay, the second sentence is pretty enough, I guess, but that first sentence makes no sense as written.
:I love Tarkovsky, but his fans can be unfathomably pretentious. I removed it. Cop 633 20:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know why Tarkovksy was not sent to Siberia for the coo-coo bird prank? Tautologist (talk) 02:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Coo-Coo" 

message: I removed the Bergman praise referring to "Tarkovsky's first film". It's confusing, but Bergman was referring to the first film HE saw by Tarkovsky, which was Andrei Rublev (he saw it in the early 70s).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.249.197 (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bergman quote
Talk:The Eel (film)

message: I watched this movie last night and the running time is 133 minutes. I don't know why it is written 117 here, on IMDb, and everywhere. More than one version of the film? Nonsonninguen (talk) 08:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running time
Talk:Rosetta (film)

message: The film summary is terrible and misconstrues some events in the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.247.125.217 (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: comment on summary
Talk:Balraj Sahni

message: I copyedited this article. It was okay for the most part, but just needed a bit of cleaning up. Gujuguy 21:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled