lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sweet chili sauce

message: For some people it seems that sweet chilli sauce causes internal bleeding - it would be good to find some official research on this.Michaelwild (talk) 04:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  research 

message: The link to a recipe at the bottom of the page does not work anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.53.40.104 (talk) 13:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to recipe
Talk:My Mother's Castle

message: Shouldn't the title appear in English, My Mother's Castle? See .(My Mother's Castle doesn't even redirect here!)Zigzig20s 04:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Mother's Castle? 

message: I studied this book in depth whilst I was in school. The plot synopsis is incorrect as it is identical to the film, which actually used elements of 'la gloire de mon pere' and 'le chateau de ma mere'. For example the section with Isabelle is in the 1990 film but not in the book.  The plot synopsis needs to be aligned to the book  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.236.14 (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Synopsis incorrect 

message: This book is one of a series Souvenirs d'enfanceWhich has its own wikipedia article. It looks like it was just copied from the webpage about the book, but I could be wrong. I think this article should be merged with the series article. What do you think?Toandanel49 (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is part of another, maybe it is not needed?
Talk:Rose Quarter Transit Center

message: Which part is the unreferenced/uncited bit?  About the noise? I can dig up cites for just about the rest of the info here.--  Callcentermonkey 14:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I can tell you this transit center opened, as the Coliseum Transit Center, on September 1, 1985. The source? TriMet's old map which is to be used from September 1, 1985 to June 14, 1986. 
See this link for details why:
The lines it originally served included:
:4 - Fessenden (part of 4 - Division/Fessenden)
:8 - NE 15th Avenue (part of 8 - Jackson Park/NE 15th Avenue)
:41 - Fremont (now 24 - Fremont; current line terminates westbound from Gateway TC at Legacy Emanuel Hospital)
:55 - Mocks Crest (now part of 44 - Capitol Hwy./Mocks Crest)
:85 - Swan Island (then rush-hour shuttle service to guess where)
WikiPro1981X (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the full system map you mention carries that date does not mean the transit center opened on that date; maps have to be printed weeks in advance of scheduled changes.  In fact, all of the service changes originally set to go into effect on September 1, 1985 were delayed four weeks, to September 29, 1985, because of a labor conflict that almost led to a strike.  I agree that the date of Coliseum TC's opening should be added to the article (which was originally treated as just a light rail station in this article), and I'll look for a citable source when I have time. SJ Morg (talk) 08:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the heads up. According to that same source, it mentions that there would be an announcement that the following bus lines that then served what became the Coliseum TC as it was first known, would once again use the Steel Bridge in "late 1985" (this could've been November or December of '85, or even January '86). However, the very last printing of the 91-MKC Flyer line (eff. June 15, 1986) shows it using the Burnside Bridge to enter and leave downtown Portland, so further contradictions may have arisen, but the strike that was proposed in late 1985, thankfully never happened. WikiPro1981X (talk) 09:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, SJ Morg, I may have to back myself up on this. I'd say the CTC in its first phase, was just two bus stops (one for inbound runs and the other outbound) at Occident Ave. between Hassalo and Holladay streets, served then by the five bus lines I previously mentioned, and then, after its official opening Sept. 5, 1986, to coincide with the launch of the MAX Blue Line, more bus lines served this TC. A similar story can be applied to the Sunset TC (the replacement for Cedar Hills TC)--that started out in early 1997 as just a parking garage, and the only bus line that served it initially was an old version of Line 89. When that TC finally opened officially in late 1998, again, more bus lines served it. WikiPro1981X (talk) 06:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This TC Opened September 1, 1985
Talk:Dollo's law of irreversibility

message: The template at the bottom of the page describes the rule as saying "Loss of complex traits is irreversible". That's an interesting alternative way to put it, and perhaps more accurate – but the article mentions nothing about complexity of traits. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description in template at the bottom
Talk:Stenton

message: I may have one. I shall look. I am only just a new editor and I do not know how to load photos. So far I have looked at other articles in order to udnerstand links etc., but photos seem rather difficult to work out! David Lauder 14:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a good photo of Beil House before it was reduced. David Lauder 19:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: The trouble with copying wodges of stuff from guidebooks and gazeteers, as this appears to be, is that so much is now wrong, or supposition, or irrelevant toff-licking, concentrating on landowners, rather than being about people and the place as it is.86.159.129.62 (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks but much of what is written here is the history of Stenton. I contributed much and I assure you it is not "wodges from guidebooks or gazeteers", although the latter, in Scotland, tend to be excellent. Wikipedia requires sources to be shown. Until very recently the feudal system relating to superiorities and landowners remained an important feature of our country and also of its past. The land, its owners and the villages etc., were all tied together.  There is nothing stopping you making a contribution as to Stenton today, with your sources of course. But you cannot detach our country from its history. Regards, David Lauder (talk) 16:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No one's stopping anyone from adding valid info. If certain content is lacking, simply do the work of supplying it rather than bashing others for what they contributed. This also helps prove an exception to the general truth that often the anons who make bitter complaints about a lack of a certain bit of content don't actually bother to contribute it themselves. — ¾-10 02:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. David Lauder (talk) 09:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional content request
Talk:Naval History and Heritage Command

message: Everything in this article came from the NHC website and the Guide to the Naval Historical Center. I added a references section, which includes these two sources.  --Johnfmh 14:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

message: There should be an Indian Treaty Room article, regarding the latest location where George Bush, the Second, has ordered people to shop.
Thank You.
[[ hopiakuta  | [[ %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  -]] 15:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Indian Treaty Room]] 

message: Page notes 15 museums and lists 11, what about the other 4?  Is the National Navy UDT-SEAL Museum 1? 74.95.195.137 (talk) 00:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other 4 museums? 

message: Most of the text on this page is plagarized from https://www.history.navy.mil/about-us/organization/naval-history-and-heritage-command-origins.html without attribution. Reventtalk 01:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Siddharta (band)

message: The neutrality of this article is clearly disputed. Some words are outrageously unfitting (like legendary singer Vlado Kreslin). This isn't a tabloid magazine, folks. 213.161.8.138 (talk) 08:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with previous poster. Too bad I don't have the time to do it. I will try to help somehow... --RockyMM (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Screaming Yellow Zonkers

message: I remember that the box once had a contest to "Win a Continent". The fine print explained that the offer expires in 1947 (or something like that).
I also remember the list of ingredients was a multiple choice question.
The first choice was "I don't know"
The second was "I'm sure I don't know"
Another choice was "Adolphe Menjou" (old movie actor from 20's to 40's)
205.161.9.9 14:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminiscences 

message: Here's the poster actually selling for $100 on eBay.  eBay staring bids are often uninformed flights of fancy (or traps for those who presume that they don't exceed market price).  I am therefore removing the reference to the $5K starting bid. —SlamDiego 21:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  “The poster was recently listed on [[eBay]] at a starting bid of $5000.” 

message: con-agra foods says they have no record of this product. when asked if they had any record of ever having screaming yellow zonkers, they said that someone from media relations will be in touch with me. if so, i will make a note here. Badmachine (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See this article, too.  Looks like they're gone. ЭLСОВВОLД talk 17:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bummer. Well, I stand corrected. I reverted myself and added a citation of the link to that article (and deleted some dead links to Lincoln Foods). If anyone has any more sourced information, or can provide sources for the (now) un-cited claim about the black packaging, please add it. Kafziel Complaint Department 18:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Perhaps something could be said about the relation of the box design to the 'black-light poster' phenomenon of the mid- to late-sixties.208.79.244.67 (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  product may be discontinued 

message: Once there was, there existed an ugly, ugly person.  And what made him so ugly was that he had no tastes, not one.  Then he stumbled upon a box of Screaming Yellow Zonkers and stuffed some into his face.  Well, to his astoundment, they was great.  Whoa, they was more than great.  What they was was a magical butter glazed popcorn snack.  So if you're ugly, or even semi-rotten-looking, try Screaming Yellow Zonkers.  Maybe they'll change your life.  Maybe not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmathis (talk • contribs) 23:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV commercial
Talk:History of the Tyrone county football team

message: At the beginning of the section on the 1990s, there is the sentence: "by 1994, three different Ulster teams had won the All-Ireland four times in a row". I'm presuming this is referring to Down, Donegal and Derry winning the All-Ireland in 1991-94, but it isn't very clear in my opinion. It sounds like it could be claiming that the same county had won the All-Ireland four years in a row, and this had been done by 3 counties, which I don't think any county from Ulster has done. Does anyone else agree and think this needs changing? ScoobyHugh (talk) 19:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification needed
Talk:Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission

message: Kind of a lot errors in the article, for example Czechoslovakia isn't a country anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ingenmansland (talk • contribs) 13:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

message: I've hidden a photo with an editor's comment.  Why? The caption is patently incorrect.  While the caption refers to the NNSC, the personnel depicted are certainly not NNSC members.  Of the five officers shown, one has brassard from the Military Armistice Commission, one is a US Navy officer, and one is a ROK officer.  I've contacted the US Navy News Service requesting a clarification, but until they correct the caption, we should not use this photo. --S. Rich (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden Photo -- Incorrect Caption 

message: I've made a substantial enlargement to the article. I think I'm going to stop here, but while it is fresh in my mind here are some notes on areas that could warrant more coverage:
*info on infrigements found by NNSC (though it would be difficult to do in balanced way)
*more on U.S. belief tha NK was evading NNSC inspection, especially jet fighters
*more on reasons/political motivation for South Korean actions against NNSC - basically SK govt wanted war restarted
*more on underlying US/SK motivation to modernise their military in SK, contrary to 13(d), and how early this motivation started (declassified State memos would probably illuminate this) - I think essentially the US believed SK army needed to contract to permit economic development, and the US needed to cut troop levels for cost reasons, and the only way to achieve this was to completely modernise equipment & go nuclear contrary to 13(d)
*more on how 13(c) was monitored (article currently mainly covers 13(d))
That's more than enough!!
Rwendland (talk) 14:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further work 
Talk:Zotero

message: The «History» section looks wery much like a ChangeLog, nd should not be in the article in its current form.
I propose to rewrite it to only have relevant information. Wikipedia is not the place for a ChangeLog. Solbu (talk) 13:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  «History» looks like a ChangeLog, should be rewritten or removed 

message: The website now says that Zotero is produced by the Corporation for Digital Scholarship. The website for that organisation says that they have been around since 2009. 
On March 07, 2018, the website said "Zotero is a project of the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media". 
On April 11, 2018, the website said "Zotero is a project of the Corporation for Digital Scholarship and the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media".
At some point after that (and I can't be bothered going through the Wayback Machine to find an approximate date), it changes to just saying the Corporation. 
I don't know why the Corporation for Digital Scholarship website doesn't mention the Center or the University, and I don't know the connection between the two organisations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.126.111.125 (talk) 02:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the change of ownership to the article. Thanks for noticing. Enozkan (talk) 04:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporation for Digital Scholarship
Talk:Radar jamming and deception

message: I add a no references tag. I also add a stub tag; this topic is huge and the article can be expanded dramatically.--C6H12O6 14:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I believe the author was confusing radar jammers with laser jammers when he/she talked about the jammer cause an error reading.  I reworded and cited two sources. --Aka042 (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The reference to "repeater jamming" should be disambiguated. I believe the most-often used term is Deception Jamming. Furthermore, emphasis should be added that for effective deception jamming to happen, the jammer must first analyze the target radar's operating parameters, such as frequencies, PRFs, scanning patterns, etc. This of course creates the need for pre-combat electronic surveillance and analysis of an enemy's EW systems. It also creates a need for electronic discipline, such as Wartime Reserve Modes.
I will revisit this article in a couple months and if no experts act on this suggestion I will take it up myself, after cultivating sources.Wikkileaker (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Deception Jamming

message: Why is this relevant to the article? Does that specific plane have any specific jammer type? Which one? If no info is given, the picture should be removed as irrelevant. GMRE (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fighter plane picture

message: I’m attempting to find more information about what happens when multiple LIDAR are in the same vicinity on a highway.  Elon Musk of Tesla has said that LIDAR is a bad direction to go for autonomous driving.
Has anyone proposing LIDAR considered what the effects would be of having every vehicle  in bumper to bumper traffic on a 12-lane highway going in both directions, with every vehicle equipped with one or more LIDAR scanners?
The environment would be awash in laser light scatter across the ground and on every vehicle, and it may be difficult for one LIDAR to distinguish its own transmitted light from the “noise light” around it.
This is a difficult question to answer because LIDAR 3D scanner technology is still extremely expensive. it would cost an absolute fortune to outfit 100 or more vehicles with this many LIDAR to perform a real-world moving high density freeway cross-interference test.
This seems like a topic that would be important to add as a section in this article eventually. But I don’t know if any official scholarly or technical research has been done of this issue. — DMahalko (talk) 02:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-driving vehicle LIDAR interference
Talk:Pensacola Museum of Art

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dorothy Ashby

message: Allmusic.com seems to be the only source that gives 1930 as Ashby's birth year.  Other sources that I'm finding now (including another AllMusic publication, as well as another source already cited in this article) give 1932 as her birth year. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 03:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year
Talk:Sheffield Pike

message: While editing the Topography section, two corrections were made: 
1st, "The Rake" is not the name of a col, but of a path - see the article Glenridding Dodd for reasons. 
2nd, The yawning chasms on the east side of Green Side may not be entirely the results of quarrying (as the map claims), but the result of a massive collapse in the Greenside Mine in 1862 known as The Great Crush. Since this is not actually relevant to this article on Sheffield Pike I have not given a citation (but see http://www.mineexplorer.org.uk/greenside.htm), but I hope to add the details to a future page on the Greenside Mine. Silence-is-infinite (talk) 17:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Places inhabited by Rusyns

message: I would love to see a map here.
No amount of descriptive text for geographical places can convey as much knowledge to the reader as a map of the same regions can.
Does someone have a map they can post here?
Nwbeeson 15:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Professional Graphics Controller

message: The article previously stated that it contained "it's own computer". I know what it says on the link at the bottom of the page, but what it means it contains its own processor and memory (like a modern graphics card)). Own computer as such gives the impression of external connectors, cases etc. Camhusmj38 15:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the correction, you are correct. I've uploaded a 640x480 simulation. 4throck (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Perdita Durango

message: Moved the paragraph below here pending proper citation. 
Perdita Durango appears to coincide with the 1989 Matamoros murders where 30 bodies were dug up by the police and found to be ritually sacrificed. One of the victims was a 21 year old American student named Mark Kilroy from Santa Fe, Texas. Sara Aldrete Villarreal and her Cuban-American boyfriend, Adolfo de Jesus Constanzo, plus four other members of the cult were arrested or killed after gunfights with law enforcement officials
momoricks talk 08:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced info moved here 

message: Why on earth is this article titled Dance with the Devil?  The film's name is Perdita Durango.  Surely that should be the name of the article. Euchrid (talk)
*You are correct. (Sugar Bear (talk) 00:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: "The character of Perdita Durango appeared previously in David Lynch's movie Wild at Heart..." Well, yes, but this seems an odd way to put it. Barry Gifford wrote the books on which both of these films are based, and Perdita is a moderately important character in the earlier novel and the central character in this one. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gifford

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]