lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Harbour line (Mumbai Suburban Railway)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, here, here, here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Extraordinary Machine

message: #:With all due respect, I feel this is a misrepresentation of the ongoing disagreement between us. For anybody else reading this who thinks Everyking's comments could benefit from a little context, see Talk:Ashlee_Simpson#Magazine_covers and Talk:Pieces_of_Me#Excess_detail. Extraordinary Machine 12:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: {{user|Everyking}} oppose vote discussion
Talk:Murid

message: I would like to inform any concerned editors of this article that Murshid has been proposed for deletion, without even an AfD going on. I am trying to do something so that the term remains explained in Wikipedia, and have suggested a merger to Pir (Sufism) because I do not find any better way. Hoverfish Talk 12:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion of Murshid 

message: This article is about 'Murid' used(in the philosophy of the Sufi religion) to describe a person who is guided by a murshid or pir (http://www.collinsdictionary.com/). I have observed few editors confusing the term with the Muridiiya order or a boy from Senegal called talibe. I am trying to improve the article as per the definition already given. Other editors may help improve the article. Pixarh (talk) 17:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murid-a Sufi term
Talk:Diva Junction

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Dana boomer (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/internet/Soon-IRCTC-website-to-book-7200-tickets-per-minute/articleshow/20295440.cms. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 02:51, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Integral Coach Factory

message: imp  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.61.28.129 (talk) 09:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jamalpur Locomotive Workshop

message: Aprentice  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.176.76 (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Konkan Railway Corporation

message: I've removed this article from WikiProject Trains because of duplication (the article on Konkan Railway is already a part of it). SBC-YPR (talk) 10:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:RR|WikiProject Trains]]

message: The Anti-Collision Device section should really be split off as a separate item.
Tabletop (talk) 02:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split ACD 

message: "Rake of waggons/wagons/carriages" is the correct phrase, not "rack of ...".    Tabletop (talk) 04:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rake of waggons 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report-bangalore-may-get-new-rail-service-for-trucks-1719383. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Powerless in the Face of Death

message: Can anyone confirm which Aquagen mix was used in the opening montage? I'm inclined to say the radio edit. Ham Pastrami 13:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song 

message: The article said that the guard counted 23 inmates, as a second reference to the betrayal of Julius Caesar (who was stabbed 23 times). However, I just checked the episode, and he clearly says "282...283...okay, lockdown gentlemen!". 
I have removed this reference from the article. "Et tu, King Gorilla" is still a reference to the betrayal, so I left it intact.
-Juansmith 08:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second [[Julius Caesar]] reference 

message: *The scene where Jonas Jr. is fitted with a bionic arm is similar to the scene in Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back where Luke Skywalker is fitted with a bionic hand.
:This one is a bit of a stretch fellas.  What, any time someone gets a bionic limb it's suddenly a reference to Empire Strikes Back?  I could see a case for this claim if Quiz Boy Billy actually closed a little compartment on the arm, poked the finger tips with needles, or at the very least if camera angles were similar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.158.223.4 (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars reference 

message: Lots of stuff is reminiscent of lots of other stuff...we're skating on thin ice original research wise. Lots42 (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Cultural References
Talk:Non-towered airport

message: The statement 'traffic volume does not warrant' is for me misleading if not incorrect.  There are airports that warrent a tower but various issues allow it to operate without one.  These can include local opposition, finances, construction lead time, FAA red tape and other issues.  Also, does this cover the airport operation when the tower is closed?  The section on Landing and depating procedures read a lot like a how to which is not what a wiki is for.  I suspect this can be reworded and  reduced in size to eliminate this concern. Vegaswikian 17:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points!  I'll work on this more soon. —Mets501 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: never mind--Captain433180 04:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments per request 

message: I'm not convinced that this rename was right.  The article still covers airports that have towers that are not operational, correct?  If so, the title is very misleading.  Vegaswikian 05:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I don't think this rename was correct.  If I'm not mistaken, all non-towered airports are called "uncontrolled" even if they lie in controlled airspace, and "uncontrolled" also covers airports at times when the control tower is closed. —Mets501 (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking I found this, which talks about ATC's relationship to landing at uncontrolled airports which lie in controlled airspace, and says that the only thing that makes an airport "controlled" or "uncontrolled" is the presence of a control tower. —Mets501 (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Informally, I've seen both "non-towered" and "uncontrolled" used for these airports, at least in North American publications. "Non-towered" should cause less confusion, since in some cases the airspace itself is still controlled.  In the US, the FAA also seems to prefer the term "non-towered" (sometimes without the hyphen) — here's an example from an FAA safety advisor that specifically objects to the term "uncontrolled": . Finally, it's important to note that the word "tower" refers to the ATC unit, not the building, so when the ATC unit is closed, there is no tower per-se. Sometimes, especially at places like fly-ins, a temporary "tower" might just a person sitting in a lawnchair with a radio. David 19:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Non-towered airport 

message: I made for changes to the flow of the article and well as added footnote and added refs. I have to admit that it is very U.S. leaning because that is what I know. Any input from else where in the world would be great. Desertpilot (talk) 04:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Matango

message: This movie is almost as good as Star Wars! Luke, I am your father! 17:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The main article says that the film was never shown in any theaters in America.  I would think that that implies that drive-ins didn't show it either.  
Could somebody figure out which network broadcast this film first?  I think it is unlikely that a nationwide network (like ABC, CBS, or NBC) thought it fit fare for public consumption, so that leaves the "fourth-rate" networks to pick it and sling it.  Was it, as I imagine, one of the independent networks that had the bravery to broadcast it?  Could it have been the same network that had the courage to broadcast McHale's Navy?
Outside of the United States and Canada, which countries in Europe was this film first broadcast?  Was it ever shown at a film festival over there?
::I remember seeing the film in the late 1960's at a cinema in Lewisham, in London. It was a twin horror bill with Goke, the Body Snatcher from Hell (1968).(185.181.236.222 (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which networks carried this film in 1965? 

message: I think this section is ridiculous.  The comparison does not even work very well because it implies that Mrs. Howell and Yoshida the novelist are equivalent. --Scottandrewhutchins 13:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gilligan's Island

message: Episode 236's second half has a story where one of the characters has eaten a mushroom that will turn them into a mushroom person, with visual aids to show their expected Matango-ness.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.67.138 (talk) 07:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keroro Gunsou 

message: This article among many other articles various other Toho films is missing citations and information. Many of the article's sections are either unsourced or are missing citations, these issues should be fixed and the unsourced material given proper citations. This article is also missing information on the film's production, theatrical release, and reception (the latter should include both Japanese and International reception). This information is vital to the article and should be added, all of these fixes and expansions should be done to the article in order for it to fit Wikipiedia's guidelines of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , I added two reviews, production info and removed junky old wiki stuff that has not been cited for years. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and Expansion
Talk:Red Line (Delhi Metro)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Yellow Line (Delhi Metro)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:List of musicals: M to Z

message: what if it were numbered so we had an idea of how many there are without the dizzying effort of throng to count them? 162.247.210.211 (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  what if it were numbered so we had an idea of how many there are without the dizzying effort of throng to count them?
Talk:A Very Venture Christmas

message: For once, someone else has to do this-I've only the misfortune to see this episode once and like the pilot for once I can't trust myself to remember everything major in the episode. Thanks in advance, guys, I've tried to make up for it by working on the trivia and quotes extensively.
Uh, that was me who added that, BTW. Umbric Man 1:44 28th June, 2006
:Done and done -th1rt3en 19:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storyline 

message: Could someone please provide me with the information for where that deleted sketch came from? It's not on the DVD.
It came from Douglas Lovelace's website.  http://www.chrisis.org/lace_onscreen/vb1map.html is the main page and http://www.chrisis.org/lace_onscreen/vbx5.html would be the sketch itself. Radivil 07:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Storyboard Sketch 
Talk:John Bascom

message: After reading this article, it is clear to me that Bascom's character was an influence on the Wisconsin Idea: "The boundaries of the university are the boundaries of the state". --Ancheta Wis 11:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The [[Wisconsin Idea]] 
Talk:Elishe

message: This author is NOT known as 'Yeghishe' in English.  The translations of his work call him Eliseus Vartaped.  I have spent quite some time looking for this article, and failing, so we need a change here. Roger Pearse (talk) 06:25, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eliseus Vartaped
Talk:Pal Joey (novel)

message: It makes good sense to create Pal Joey (film). There are plenty of differences between the novel and the film, and plenty enough info for the film to be able to stand as its own article. For that matter, there should probably also be a Pal Joey (musical) J. Van Meter 23:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I support the split

message: I had no opinion on whether to split the movie and play, but thanks for taking the lead, J. Van Meter. Now, do you think the novel should be separated from this article? Also, The Plot summary was written (some of it by me) with both the play and film in the same article, but with these now in separate articles, perhaps the Plot summary could use a fuller explanation of some of the plot points--what do you think? (I can do it later tonight, if you'd like, although it shouldn't be too hard.)
JeanColumbia 12:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added most of the material about the possible revival on the musical play--I've been thinking of shortening the paragraph, it's gotten unwieldy. Again, I'll be glad to rewrite, but later. (Not sure this comment belongs here, may move it when I get the time)
JeanColumbia 12:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes - as I said above, I definitely think the film should be a separate article. Every link that's left to this page is about the film not the book. Now, I'm not sure whether they should be called "Pal Joey (novel)" and "Pal Joey (film)" , or if the novel should stay plain "Pal Joey" or if it deserves a disambig page or what. Both the film plot and the movie plot sections could sure use some more filling out -- if you have the time to get to those it would be terrific. J. Van Meter 14:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pal Joey

message: I added to both the stage and film articles, they aren't perfect by any means, but at least they can now each stand on their own and have most of the info that I think should be there. I'm still thinking about an info box for the stage article--not sure how useful it is.
After giving this some thought, I agree that the film and book should be split. The film can stand on its own. The book section needs more work.
I'd like to see the film titled "Pal Joey (film)" just to make it perfectly clear. I don't know enough about "disambig", but perhaps start out with the book simply "Pal Joey" and see what comments (if any) or problems arise.
JeanColumbia 11:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes, I think that would be fine: keep the novel article here and titled "Pal Joey" and move the film section to it's own article called Pal Joey (film). Should I move it, or do you want to?J. Van Meter 14:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Great...you had better move it--I don't know enough to do it.
JeanColumbia 15:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split Film and Book
Talk:Perchance to Dream (musical)

message: ...is there any indication of plot, perhaps borrowing from 'Hamlet'? LessHeard vanU 21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, not the moping Dane. LessHeard vanU 21:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  As it is from a Shakespeare quote...
Talk:Telescope Peak

message: Telescope Peak's name was originally 'Chiombe', an unfortunately under-reported name and fact that should be relevant to this page. Could we add this? I am sorry if I am not following correct procedure, I have not edited wikipedia before. I have added it in the style similar to that of the 'Mount Whitney' article which lists the indigenous tribes, linking to its respective language article, and bolded the name afterwards.
Sourcing: Mineral Resources of the States and Territories West of the Rocky ..., Volume 6
By United States. Department of the Treasury (https://books.google.com/books?id=0JdAAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA60&lpg=PA60&dq=%22chiombe%22+telescope+peak&source=bl&ots=jCo8aPjUxp&sig=ACfU3U0ZJBZf-VIJgUXEjrZVTV8LDlRCMw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9_NjchoL9AhWUK30KHXvdCBUQ6AF6BAgGEAM#v=onepage&q=%22chiombe%22%20telescope%20peak&f=false)
Engineering and Mining Journal: https://books.google.com/books?id=WpE-AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=%22chiombe%22+telescope+peak&source=bl&ots=JCNuLtAmop&sig=ACfU3U0aGX79knoSgzDlrrr3v-qS6VftCg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9_NjchoL9AhWUK30KHXvdCBUQ6AF6BAgdEAM#v=onepage&q=%22chiombe%22%20telescope%20peak&f=false
University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons
American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/217219012.pdf Fourbygleek (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worthwhile to add native name?
Talk:Pippin (musical)

message: Most of the synopsis is WP:OR and speculation, and not written in an encyclopedic tone. Somebody more familiar with the musical than I am should clean it up; I am not really able to do so because I have only heard the soundtrack and not seen the musical, and much of what is claimed is probably only evidenced by the acting, if at all.--Grand Slam 7 | Talk 00:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am currently a music director of a run of this show and am trying to clean up. 70.17.135.67 06:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited the article's synopsis considerably, and feel any tinges of original research have been removed, and the article put into a more appropriate voice. I have removed the "tone" template accordingly. 70.17.135.67 06:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of the article 

message: I thought that I was removing an amateur production (per the guidelines @ WP:WPMT article structure), which I've done before, easy stuff, but somehow I did not. My technical error, just don't know what happened! In any event , another editor made it right, thanks. JeanColumbia (talk) 22:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Productions

message: As per "Tone..." above I deleted a large section in the intro due to speculation. Feel free to re-add it with a source, but it makes more sense in its own section, not the intro.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.245.239 (talk) 03:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 2 

message: Peter Cousens' Kookaburra company tried to put Pippin on in 2007.  Why was this fact edited out? Some apparatchik of the theatre mafia got rid of it? Embarrassment? The fault is not in our stars - it lies in the fact that the honest yeomen of Australia and their families are not interested in the arts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:336F:DF00:805B:9FF0:D36E:CD5B (talk) 09:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Cousens' production  in 2007 

message: The character Phil Dunphy from the U.S. sitcom Modern Family references Pippin in the 2011 episode ‘Slow Down Your Neighbours’. 82.9.201.220 (talk) 22:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:0-2-2

message: Isn't the image on this page showing a 2-2-0 type? Zhatt 23:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because the exhaust stack is the front of the locomotive and the pistons drive the front axle.  Slambo (Speak) 20:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. I couldn't tell what direction it traveled in. Thanks. Zhatt 19:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image