lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Capoeira lineage under Mestre Pastinha

message: Lineage of Capoeira Angola mestres under Pastinha. Feel free to add, but I don't think this tree should go more than four deep. To add or edit, look at Template talk:familytree, or leave me a note at my talk page. — Asbestos | Talk  (RFC) 15:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've changed this into a complete article. Please help expand into a full-sized encyclopedic work. — Asbestos | Talk  (RFC) 17:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Tibia (video game)/archive

message: Is this post necessary? It seems to contain obligatory derogatory references to Brazilians online and is a fluff piece about an online game.
: I found it quite informative.
: I do belive the page should exist, it is a popular online game that has existed since apx 1996, with over 100,000 players world wide, and any derogetory remarks have been removed sence discovered. --Silver86 20:11, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed this and added the computer game info box, but this article is still in dire need of a rewrite. See here for guidelines --C3o 21:13, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Page
Talk:Emma (1996 theatrical film)

message: I concur with the merge request, or barring that, deleting this page entirely.Alan 03:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: In the casting section it says that the thespians who portray Mr. Elton and his wife steal most of the comedic moments in the film. I might agree with that, but isn't it something of an opinion rather than a fact? (Unless there are articles in which the critics or large sections of the public share that opinion). --198.110.207.233 (talk) 05:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Casting

message: The song Silent Worship which is sung by Emma and Mr Churchill in the film is lovely but quite anachronistic in that setting. Although the melody was written by Handel in 1728 for a song, Non lo dirò col labbro, in his opera, Tolomeo, the lyrics for the song, Silent Worship, were not written until 1927 by Arthur Somervell, some 100+ years after the events of Emma were set. Worth mentioning in the article ? -- Derek Ross | Talk 05:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Silent Worship

message: Disambiguation needed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_(2020_film)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.98.105 (talk) 19:15, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Emma (2020 film)]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Ruy Lopez/Evidence

message: I may have duplicated btipling's evidence a little, but I felt that it would be best if we laid out all the diffs for the arbcom to see. Johnleemk | Talk 15:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but you listed the specific edits, which was probably better than what I did. (Bjorn Tipling 18:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible duplication
Talk:Red-Headed Woman

message: The article says that Harlow wore a red wig in the film. First, how do we know that and second, why did she have to do that, considering it's a black & white film. --Mathew5000 09:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why the red wig 
Talk:Bed of Roses (1933 film)

message: Saw this more than once at the Museum of Modern Art and was electrified by the plot as well as the amazing 1933 dialogue. Constance Bennett and the rapturously gorgeous Pert Kelton (the original Alice Kramden in Jackie Gleason's The Honeymooners two decades later) play a couple of prostitutes who get men drunk then rob them, a common occurrence in real life, which could only be a pre-Code plotline and plays in the film a lot better than it sounds. I urge you to move heaven and earth to attempt to behold this rarely screened but dazzling masterpiece of genius from writer/director Gregory La Cava.  George Raft Has Risen From the Grave (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Shockingly Racy and Stunning Pre-Code Comedy Masterpiece
Talk:Berkeley Square (1933 film)

message: I just noticed the text: "A newly restored 35mm print has been made, and the restored version was first shown at the 2011 H.P. Lovecraft Film Festival." at the top
I ran that festival, and can provide more information about it if needed. It was a bit of a chore to get that new print, but I am very glad I did. 
Specifically, please update the credit as follows:
"... the 2011 H.P. Lovecraft Film Festival®-Los Angeles."
The festival is a registered trademark, so needs the ®, and there were two instances of the HPLFF: the original, which started in Portland, Oregon (with a fraction of inspiration from me) and has been occurring since 1997, and then the Los Angeles version, which I started and ran annually from 2010 to 2016. It has also traveled to other cities a few times as well.
Mainly, please identify the trademark and the specific location of the festival that showed  the restored print (print courtesy of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences). 
Also in attendance at that screening was director Frank Lloyd's grandson Christpher Gray, who gave a great speech and brought a prop from the movie. Source: https://www.franklloydfilms.com/NOW%20SHOWING.html (scroll down) SDFAaron (talk) 09:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  restored version playing at H.P. Lovecraft Film Festival
Talk:Gabriel Over the White House

message: I know the Turner web page says this was a hit but I've got two well researched print sources which disagree:
*Black, Gregory D. Hollywood Censored: Morality Codes, Catholics, and the Movies. Cambridge University Press 1996  (pg. 144)
*Doherty, Thomas Patrick. Pre-Code Hollywood: Sex, Immorality, and Insurrection in American Cinema 1930-1934. New York: Columbia University Press 1999.  (pg. 75) 
Quadzilla99 (talk) 15:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Office numbers 

message: There are twenty references that this movie was about a fascist-like takeover of the US government by a president. A better balance could be achieved with an additional line "Measures such as these can be found in the Lincoln administration."http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/abraham-lincoln-and-civil-liberties-in-wartime
The article fails to emphasize the prophetic nature of this 1933 movie. Not just that is poses a requisite socio-political solution to the anger and deep wounds of the populus which existed in 1933, but also that aircraft would make battleships without aircraft protection obsolete.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship#World_War_II
BookemDanno1 (talk) 20:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monomaniac fascist references 

message: Halfway through the Plot section something goes wrong with the text. As if it was copied by a primitive OCR. Sajita (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbled text
Talk:Der Hitlerjunge Quex

message: The titel is wrong, the correct translation is Hitler boy Quex, because the members of the Hitler Jugend (Hitker youth) call 
( Hitler Junge ) Hitler Junge.
: I see your point, but the custom is to use the most frequent translation in use. Movie titles are not always translated precisely. And, in English "a youth" can be an individual as well. I will create Hitler boy Quex as a redirect, however. Tfine80 15:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the movie contained also the first airing of the Hitler Youth anthem Vorwärts, Vorwärts--Tresckow 09:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I moved the page to Der Hitlerjunge Quex as it is a German book which never had an English translation. In any case, the article “Der”/“The” is part of the book's title. Steepleman (t) 09:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title
Talk:Morgenrot (film)

message: I would like to two suggestions here. First thing, the film  offers a thinly disguised version of the death of the War Secretary, Field Marshal Kitchener, on abroad the cruiser HMS Hampshire on his way to Russia in 1916. The Hampshire was sunk by a mine, but in this film it is sunk by the U-boat. The plot of the film concerns a very important British military leader who in 1916 boards a cruiser that is take him to a conference in Russia, leading to the U-boat being sent out to essentially assassinate him by sinking the cruiser. The leader is not named as Kitchener, but one clearly see who is he is supposed to be. A cruiser taking a very important British leader to Russia in 1916 that gets sunk on the way was clearly inspired by the sinking of the Hampshire. This film caused considerable offense in Britain at the time, which the article does not mention. Kitchener was one of the most popular British war heroes of the late Victorian age, and a film that celebrates his death caused a very negative reaction in the United Kingdom.  
The second this is described as a Nazi film. Morgenrot premiered in 1933, but it was shot in 1932 and the script for it was written in 1931. The studio that produced Morgenrot was UFA, which was owned by a very right-wing millionaire media magnate named Alfred Hugenberg who was also the leader of the German National People's Party from 1928 onward. Hugenberg expressly brought the UFA studio in 1927 to make right-wing "national" films that he wanted to see, and Morgenrot was one of several "national" films that UFA released under Hugenberg's prompting. The DNVP can be charitably described as an extremely right-wing party that was borderline fascist in its politics, so it is not surprising that there was a considerable overlap in the worldviews of the DNVP and the NSDAP. But this film is more properly a DNVP film than a Nazi film-it just happened to be released on 2 February 1933, just four days after Hitler was appointed chancellor on 30 January 1933. --A.S. Brown (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Some suggestions

message: https://www.lieder-archiv.de/morgenrot_leuchtest_mir_zum_fruehen_tod-notenblatt_300508.html
About a really good translation of this short verse, for once in the life a proper English translation would be longer than the original German one, but poets have the virtue to say much through few (sometimes taking the freedom to use words stretching their meanings where we wouldn't never dare)… and I'm not a Shakespeare, able to can do it, ENTITLED to do it mastering his way the English language, having earned the privilege to 'bend it' to the scope, shorten the verse in harmony. GianMarco Tavazzani (talk) 21:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leutest, not lauchtest
Talk:Roman Scandals

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: A pun on Roman sandals? I thought it was a pun on Roman candles. Valetude (talk) 08:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Victor and Victoria

message: There's no plot resumé. The statement of the theme is, perhaps, an indication of the kind of things which *might* be in store. But that'll hardly serve! Nuttyskin (talk) 01:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?
Talk:Death Takes a Holiday

message: Who happened to, um, write it, pray tell?  GcT (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who happened to, um, write it, pray tell? 
Talk:Jud Süß (Hauff novel)

message: I'd like to split this article into at least 2, having 1 page for 2 different movies is a little sloppy.user:pzg_ratzinger
:Agreed, but it is also two different novel/novellas these should all be expanded before seperation with a care to which films are adaptations of which novels. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Split
Talk:Maniac (1934 film)

message: While it is not my least favorite movie ever (far from it), this is easily (and without a doubt) the worst film I have ever seen. However, I can't find any reliable sources really stating how terrible this movie is. If anyone could find some, (assuming anyone ever reads this message), I think it would be a good idea to include in this article- but include using sources- that this film is god-awful. -- Kicking222 19:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Worst ever made
Talk:Sing As We Go

message: ==Untitled==
Did Davies write both the music and the lyrics of this song? 86.145.155.99 (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music and lyrics? 

message: Did Davies write both the music and the lyrics of this song? 86.145.155.99 (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dante's Inferno (1935 film)

message: ==Untitled==
I can't parse this sentence: "Except for a reference in a line of dialog in the 1938 film Boy Meets Girl, the conclusion of this movie (made in 1935) was the only time that a filmed scene was suggested in the burning of the SS Morro Castle (which occurred in 1934)."  Does anyone know what the article is trying to communicate here?  If you do, please edit this sentence so that it is well-formed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.97.49.124 (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto! ---Puff (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tangled Grammar

message: I can't parse this sentence: "Except for a reference in a line of dialog in the 1938 film Boy Meets Girl, the conclusion of this movie (made in 1935) was the only time that a filmed scene was suggested in the burning of the SS Morro Castle (which occurred in 1934)."  Does anyone know what the article is trying to communicate here?  If you do, please edit this sentence so that it is well-formed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.97.49.124 (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto! ---Puff (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unless someone disagrees, I'll put away the poster image from this page. It's for another movie altogether; Dante's Inferno (2007 film). You'll know that too if you a wee bit research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.160.250.14 (talk) 13:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong poster!
Talk:Grottaminarda

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
Coordinates are wrong - actually 41.0'14 / 15.03'36 - see Google Earth
71.174.138.110 (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 23:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:I Haven't Got a Hat

message: ===tip my===
====hat to you,====
=====but I haven't got=====
a
======hat!!!!!!!!======
--Looney Kid (talk) 03:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I'd

message: ====hat to you,====
=====but I haven't got=====
a
======hat!!!!!!!!======
--Looney Kid (talk) 03:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: tip my

message: =====but I haven't got=====
a
======hat!!!!!!!!======
--Looney Kid (talk) 03:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: hat to you,

message: a
======hat!!!!!!!!======
--Looney Kid (talk) 03:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: but I haven't got

message: --Looney Kid (talk) 03:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: hat!!!!!!!!
Talk:Thrust fault

message: The "History" section mentions "Escher, Heim and Bernard". Shouldn't "Bernard" rather be "Bertrand" (Marcel Alexandre Bertrand, 1847-1907)? 71.141.118.221 (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry that took so long to correct, now changed to Bertrand. Mikenorton (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History: Bernard or Bertrand?

message: "Because of their low dip, thrusts are also difficult to appreciate in mapping, where lithological offsets are generally subtle and stratigraphic repetition difficult to detect especially in peneplanated areas".76.95.209.135 (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a way to express this in  more layman-friendly terms?
Talk:Edward Pilgrim

message: Was his wife really "Martgaret", or is that a typo? My Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. vol. 44 has gone missing, or I'd check myself ;-) —Bunchofgrapes  (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Typpo.  Lunchtime, or I'd fixit meself.  Geogre 16:14, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks.  The way I work is by glancing over my notes to find the death date, typing it, and then going on, where, later, when I put the date in the narrative, I was not glancing but reading.  I.e. the later date would be the right one.  I've changed it. Geogre 12:42, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is so well-intentioned about robbing people of their property without just compensation? --Jcmo (talk) 11:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The legislation was well intended.  It was intended to prevent people defrauding the government by saying, "Right! Well, this here swamp land could become a great amusement park, so I want you to pay me millions."  The fact that it was poorly executed is at the heart of things.  The fact that it was blindly applied is the critical feature of red tape murder.  Geogre (talk) 12:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But this law wasn't meant to be applied to useless land, was it? This law gave the Government the power to forcibly remove (some would say steal) land from its rightful owners, and use it for residencial or commercial purposes, while at the same time paying those owners a small compensation for that land, as if it was not fit for such purposes. --Jcmo (talk) 10:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

text: You want to see Eminent domain, then.  In the grand scheme of things, this one was pretty well intentioned, given the fact that there have been thousands of seizures for military uses (bombing ranges and the like), and even for resale to commercial developers.  This one was to create public housing.  Geogre (talk) 12:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "well-intentioned abuses of bureaucracy" 

message: Surely that doesn't make sense? Arthulian (talk) 04:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure it does.  It is an uncommon usage, but it is entirely cromulent to refer to a person who commits suicide as "a suicide."  You can see it here, but it is proper, and any translation of Dante will have the outer circle of Hell for "suicides."  Geogre (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It may make sense to people who know that, but we aren't living in that time. It should be more of about our time..with out the leet speak and aim speek of course. Rgoodermote  01:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

text: The issue is that a lot of people won't get that term. It's not used in common speech today. All that will end up happening is some sort of edit war over the wording. However, I'm not going to fight on this anymore. This isn't even my thing. Rgoodermote  21:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward Alexander Pilgrim was a British homeowner and suicide
Talk:Amos Bronson Alcott

message: It ought to be mentioned Alcott was a supporter of the Secret Six.
:Agreed. Can anyone provide a source we can reference? --Midnightdreary (talk) 17:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Brown 

message: Is it known what he dies of ? -- Beardo (talk) 21:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Worth, West Sussex

message: I have rewritten this article since it seem to be uncertain of what it is discussing! There are two parts to Worth:
* the part now subsumed within Crawley New Town, but an ancient village nonetheless
* the civil parish, which has been much reduced from its original size. 
I have therefore divided the article between those two parts.
There is some discussion as to the need to have a separate article for each of the neighbourhoods of Crawley: I agree with the suggestion that there is no need, and none of them can be truly called villages in any case! Peter Shearan 16:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

message: From my extensive research of the Worth area I can clarify that the area actually falls in the Mid Sussex area.
The place called Worth in Crawley has been renamed Worth by some bored residents who go around changing the signs!!
That area actually falls into the neighbourhood of Pound Hill or Maidenbower. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.83.85.193 (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth / Mid Sussex 

message: I propose that unless much more can be said about this settlement, the content should be merged to a topic more likely to receive search hits, and our readers given a more informative article overall. Rodhullandemu 23:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, with redirect 

message: The statement 'Worth is a civil parish in the borough of Crawley and Mid Sussex district of West Sussex' is confusing - it can't be both.  There is a civil parish in Mid Sussex District called Worth - the principal settlements being Copthorne and Crawley Down.  It should have a separate page, as does every other civil parish in Mid Sussex. There is a part of Crawley called 'Worth' (labelled as such on the 1:25 000 OS map). It should be covered in the article on Crawley, or in a separate article called (perhaps) Worth Village, Crawley. Topo122 (talk) 16:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it should be split back, while its true that we don't normally have separate articles for settlement and CP, this shouldn't apply when the CP doesn't include the settlement. Crouch, Swale (talk)  09:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth Civil Parish and Worth Village
Talk:Verger

message: I realise that it is qualified by “perhaps”, but the assertion of the WS Maughm short-story being the best know depiction of a CoE verger smacks of original reasearch. For example, the character of the Verger Mr. Henry Yeatman, as played by Edward Sinclair on the BBC’s “Dad’s Army”, which continues to be shown to this day to audiences of millions, and has been shown around the world, could just as easily be said to form a picture of a verger in popular culture, yet he doesn’t even merit a mention. I’m not saying he is, just suggesting that it would impossible ever to measure such a status in an encylopædic fashion. Jock123 (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best known depiction… 

message: I appreciate the posting of the pics, because they are intended to help us visualize the verger and staff, but they are too small. Can we get a larger set please? We don't have them where I live, so I can't do it myself. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pics
Talk:Eisa (dance)

message: I'm redirecting it to Ryukyuan religion, where I plan to go into some detail.  As it is, it's terrible.  Turly-burly 16:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one seemed to notice the redirect, nor did anyone have any comments on the condition of/lack of an Eisa article, I completely changed the content and provided some useful links.  I hate to totally scrap the original but it featured little more than a ridiculous anonymous edit.  There is a book by a museum curator in Urasoe that has some great information that I'm going to try to get my hands on to use as a source.  Until then, I hope this helps!  Turly-burly 05:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Until someone is willing to fill this out, 

message: I have changed the orphaned article of "Eisa Festival" (created by ) into redirect. I think much of the important content is already covered by the current version. Help us if you don't think it's enough. --Nanshu (talk) 08:04, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 