Talk:Meg Cabot

message: Could anyone post a few pictures on the main page of the books, author and the like? The Princess Diaries cover is nice, however I think additional displayed pictures would really add something nice to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loofahbathbuddy (talk • contribs) 14:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures/Photos 

message: Why are there such huge summaries for The Mediator and 1-800 but not the rest of her books? I took a lot of time revamping The Princess Diaries section, her largest selling series. All-American Girl, another #1 best seller, also lacks information. I think we need to severely edit the Mediator and 1-800 sections and add to her more known books. Maggieab10k 16:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries 

message: I thoroughly cleaned up some of the grammatical errors and unnecessary, superfluous summaries on this page the other day but my entire edit was reverted and I was accused of vandalism. I also was correcting the order of the PD book series. If someone has a reason to think I have vandalized, please explain WHY instead of simply deleting everything I worked on and sending me a warning. I would appreciate some teamwork. Maggieab10k 17:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not involved in this article, nor in any disputes about it, but reviewed the revision history after seeing the post on Wikipedia:Third opinion#Active disagreements dated 17:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

text: While the repeated linking of The Princess Diaries in the Works section was not necessary, as it was already linked in the first paragraph, that is a Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) issue, not content.  Rather than reverting edits wholesale, it is consistent with Wikipedia:Civility to briefly explain, on the article talk page, why it was not needed.   Athænara  ✉ 20:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting Edits 

message: There is a list for Meg's personal websites, but should we let there be a link to a fansite? I'm wondering what anyone else thinks. Maggieab10k 15:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, fansites are to be avoided if at all possible. The only time a fansite is typically acceptable is if it is extremely notable AND reliable. --pIrish 21:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal websites 

message: I suggest that the section on her YA novels be split to a separate article, perhaps titled Meg Cabot Novels or something like it. THe article is supposed to be a summary of Meg Cabot's life, not a reference to her lesser known works. 68.183.182.214 (talk) 09:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting Suggestion

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "megcabot.com blog" :
** Princess Diaries Length, Meg Cabot
** Book Mistake, Meg Cabot
** Meg Cabot's Blog, Meg Cabot
DumZiBoT (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: An image used in this article, File:QueenofBabble2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 12 June 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:QueenofBabble2.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:QueenofBabble2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Substituted at 23:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Meg Cabot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.megcabot.com/chattranscripts/ChatTranscript_01-29-05.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100305235503/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/03/03/disney-channel-disney-xd-present-programming-plans-for-2010-11/43759 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/03/03/disney-channel-disney-xd-present-programming-plans-for-2010-11/43759
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meg Cabot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227134614/http://www.cosmogirl.com/entertainment/book-club/meg-cabot-bio to http://www.cosmogirl.com/entertainment/book-club/meg-cabot-bio
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The references on this article are severely lacking. In order to support due weight we need content based on reliable independent sources. If no one but the subject finds the information notable enough to publishe it in a reliable source it doesn't belong on WP. Assistance in finding references to support the content would be appreciated. I would prefer not to trim away all the uncited material but policy (particularly in a bio of a living person) must be referenced. MrBill3 (talk) 02:44, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire article very poorly referenced 

message: I am going to take a stab at cleaning up and properly referencing this article. If anyone has any questions or issues, please leave your comments here. ScienceAdvisor (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up