Talk:Fremantle Arts Centre

message: A citation about ghosts and its high ranking ghostly status from "haunted.com.au", needs a reality check  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.189.114 (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier unsigned anonymous comment

message: The information on the Wiki page is unverified - citing only a bootleg ghost hunter's website as a source. 
The centre has a social history of ghosts, that is, there are rumours circulating about ghosts of convicts from the building's historical uses, but there is no factual information available about ghosts on the site.
I don't think it should be featured on the page.
FremantleArtsCentre (talk) 04:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Then get a source from a 'genuine ghost hunter', the fact is those rumours are around. cygnis insignis 10:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Facts 

message: *It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications. Tagged since January 2011.
done
*Its quality may be compromised by peacock terms. Tagged since January 2011.
Fix whichever sentence troubles you, I don't see it.
*It is written like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. Tagged since January 2011.
ditto
*It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter. Tagged since January 2011.
see above, they appear to be a new editor and their contribution was to remove fact with a citation.
cygnis insignis 10:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues tag

message: (Just thought I'd note this down here, for future reference; I've been looking for photos of the site in the '40s.)  According to her oral history in Wharf Rats and Other Stories (ed. Karen Lang & Jan Newman), Elizabeth Grose's brother William Farmer was the foreman at 'Receiving Barracks, Navy 137' (as the US Navy then called it). — Sam Wilson ( Talk • Contribs ) … 08:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use by the US Navy during WWII 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Fremantle Arts Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090721034246/http://www.thewest.com.au:80/default.aspx?MenuID=77&ContentID=156433 to http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx?MenuID=77&ContentID=156433
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Move. Overwhelming support for move back to Fremantle Arts Centre, concensus should now prevent move warring. (non-admin closure) A y d o h 8 ( t a l k ) 04:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Museum and Arts Centre, Fremantle →  – The article was moved to 'Musuem and Arts Centre, Fremantle', without any prior discussion or debate, when that change was reverted, as it was identified as a controversial move, the original mover changed it back, contrary to the provisions of WP:BOLDMOVE. As a result I am now initiating a WP:RMCM process. The reason for reverting the article title back to its original title is as per WP:COMMONNAME this is the name that the building is known by. The owners of the building, Fremantle City Council, have called this building and complex, the Fremantle Arts Centre for the last two decades. All the signage on the building and directional signage to the building states 'Fremantle Arts Centre'. A google search indicates that it is the name that the building is most commonly known by. Also there has not been a museum in the building for the last two decades, since the Maritime Museum moved to the Fremantle West End. Dan arndt (talk) 04:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Strong Support,  see my comments in previous section about official name(s) and the irrelevance of such items.  Also in the Heritage listing, there is a specific statement as to what the location is known as. JarrahTree 04:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Strong Oppose, the article is about an historical building and the current title is the official name on the Heritage records. It is not about the business that currently occupies the building. That business already has one article at Fremantle Press. Clearly the notable business Fremantle Arts Centre should have an article, but it is not the same as the building and should be at the current redirect. Skyerise (talk) 11:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reject alternative, that was one of the building's former names but it isn't the current name, or the name that it is most commonly known as. Dan arndt (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Reject alternative, as its a discontinue offensive term for people with mental Illness, it is not common name used reference to site now due to this language. Gnangarra 13:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 September 2023 

message: Does anyone have any objection to my making Fremantle Arts Centre a disambiguation page pending the conclusion of the move request? Skyerise (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I for one object ... it would require lots of link-fixing that might all be for nought. Graham87 17:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Aren't there bots that take care of that? That's a rhetorical question: yes, there are. Skyerise (talk) 17:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there aren't, because this process can't be fully automated; see Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Fixing a page. While there are tools that make disambiguation link fixing relatively efficient, the human editors behind the disambig link fixing project wouldn't appreciate link-fixing that turns out to be useless. Graham87 18:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I'll leave it alone. Skyerise (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to add on a little more, yes AWB could help or I believe DisambigAssist as well. However I don't think it should be done especially seeing how contentious the proposed move is with the ANI discussion and everything. It just seems like it might create a bigger mess with more possible edit warring. But I also agree with Graham based on content-based reasoning which I might elaborate on in the respective move proposals. Fork99 (talk) 19:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query