lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Park and ride

message: Just to say i agree with the merger Simply south 19:57, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Six pictures, including two of "park and ride buses" (which are no different than any other bus) in such a short article simply clutter up the page. A picture of a sign and another of a park & ride itself would be sufficient. I mean, is it that hard to get a picture that captures a bus, the parking lot, and some commuters all at once?--172.192.105.35 (talk) 09:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  excessive images 

message: The file :File:KissandRideAtAlewife.agr.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:KissandRideAtAlewife.agr.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. --Commons fair use upload bot  —Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:KissandRideAtAlewife.agr.jpg]] 

message: This article is almost exclusively dedicated to park & rides in Europe (including the "P+R" abbreviation, which is unknown in the US) and doesn't even include any mention of the fact that park & rides have been around in the US longer than they've been around in Europe. (Massachusetts has had them since the 1950s, for instance.) Anyone want to fix? BeIsKr (talk) 04:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentrism 

message: A WP:DICTDEF of a term that seems to only be used in UK government planning documents.  If this is a notable phenomenon in practice, it should be discussed at Park and ride. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 16:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is very much a notable phenomenon in practice (Epping tube station is a good example of where it happens), however its not really the same concept as park and ride. Thryduulf (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I would consider railheading as a specific use pattern of a park-and-ride system; it would have to be a . User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π, ν) 17:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose; I agree with Thryduulf that these are distinct topics warranting separate coverage. The case for Railheading being a subset of Park and ride is very strained. Klbrain (talk) 08:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Closing, given that there is consensus that these are distinct topics. Klbrain (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Railheading]] into [[Park and ride]]
Talk:Chaplin (disambiguation)

message: Why should the default for Chaplin disambiguation go to the Chaplin? I would think that either the main article about Charlie Chaplin or the dismbiguation page itself would be a better choice.  Or maybe even the yet-unwritten page that discusses the origin and functions of a chaplin would be a good choice. Any objection if I move the film to Chaplin (film)?Bejnar 20:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Default for Chaplin

message: On 2 October 2006, IP address 192.176.237.1 changed the date of the movie "Unknown Chaplin" from 1983 to 2005.  The 1983 date is verified at IMDB.  Bejnar 04:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Film "Unknown Chaplin"
Talk:Wintendo

message: Why is a protected deleted page the #5 result on Google:wintendo? After three months (article was protected on 2006-05-01), I'd suggest redirecting to Microsoft Windows. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 04:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 23:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not redirect to [[Microsoft Windows]]? 

message: Guys, I've changed this redirect to point to Gaming computer, as the term "Wintendo" actually has nothing to do with Nintendo and is defined by Urban Dictionary as:
"A Windows-based system that is used only for gaming, whose user prefers a REAL Unix-based operating system (often some distribution of Linux or, more often, Mac OS X) for their serious work."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CalusReyma (talk • contribs) 05:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed redirect to [[Gaming computer]]
Talk:Timeline of the 2006 Pacific hurricane season

message: A timeline graphic like the 2005 AHS would be nice. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 20:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, I'll add it. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 19:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Felicity Lott

message: If she is "universally known as Flott…", how come this article doesn't call her that?
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 20:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pretty much every bio has a one-liner on family life if it's publicly known and particularly if it's uncontroversial, which this is. There is no sensible reason to cut it as "not encyclopedic." What on earth? - David Gerard 11:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:Mohammedan

message: This page is misleading because it says that European had a mistaken belief about Muslims, and that the term "Christian" is based on the worship of Christ. There is a source about what "some Europeans believed". Okay, I am sure that some Europeans were mistaken, just as I am sure that some Muslims were mistaken about how the English language works. The term "Christian" comes from belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ, and not from worship of Christ. Mohammedan and Christian are analogous to many other terms, such as Lutheran, Buddhist, Confucian, Calvinist, etc. They mean following the teachings, not worship. Some Muslims object to the term Mohammedan anyway, but this objection should not be extended to leave the reader entirely false impressions about what Europeans believed and how English works. I have made a couple of edits to partially correct the article, but they have been reverted. Please address the issues here. Roger (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Rolls-Royce Submarines

message: I've reverted the stubs to "Company" rather than "Energy company" as the other entries in the latter category are energy/power producers whereas RRMPO are really manufacturers of marine engines (albeit some of them are nuclear reactor powered). - MightyWarrior 20:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  Number 57 21:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rolls-Royce Marine Power Operations →  – The company changed its name on 1 August 2018. MightyWarrior (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Companies has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Derbyshire has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Is this the WP:COMMONNAME (per WP:NAMECHANGES)? Google results seem to show more results for the current title than the proposed. Cheers, 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

text: What evidence do you present to support the name change? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 06:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The register at Companies House shows the company's name change: .  And Rolls-Royce plc Annual Report 2021 (page 194) lists this company as a subsidiary: . Recent news article refers to Rolls-Royce Submarines: . MightyWarrior (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 March 2022
Talk:Nikšić

message: The history text is a violation of copyright of www.niksic.cg.yu (Copyright by Skupstina Opstine Niksic  ©2002)
:I've removed that section. It should be re-written. Mak (talk) 20:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sporocarp

message: There is no content on the fruiting body page that cannot be (and hasn't already) been included here on the sporocarp page, but the reverse is not true.  Both articles are stubs and have been for a long time, so maintaining the two stubs independently doesn't seem wise.  Since the fruiting body page defines it as a synonym of sporocarp, and since "sporocarp" encompasses additional material, the fruiting body article should be converted to a redirect. --EncycloPetey 21:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[fruiting body]] into [[sporocarp]] 

message: Fungal and fern fruiting body are two very different structures that happen to share the same name. I believe these should be split off into their own articles, with "Sporocarp" serving as a disambiguation page. Additionally, there are a bunch of related proposals concerning ascocarp, basidiocarp, and fruiting body. Here's what I propose:
*Sporocarp – reduce to a disambiguation page.
*Sporocarp (fern) – create from section of this article.
*Sporocarp (fungi) – create from section of this article.
**Fruiting body – reduce to a disambiguation page (since there are bacterial fruiting bodies), merge most content into above article.
::(Alternately, there could be a complete merge into the above article, with a disambiguation statement about "fruiting body" above the beginning of the article.)
*Ascocarp – keep (in pretty good shape)
*Basidiocarp – recreate (should be analogous to the Ascocarp article, discussing different kinds of fruiting body morphology – agarics, boletes, gastroid fungi, etc.)
Let me know what you think. Peter G Werner 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about fungal biology but sounds good to me. Anything is better than ad hoc pages Cas Liber 08:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The proposal seems fine to me. Strobilomyces 21:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It looks workable to me, though the burden of it would fall on the mycology articles.  I can't help thinking there is a better way to handle fruiting body, but offhand can't think of anything to suggest.  I wonder though if it might not be best to not have a separate sporocarp (fungi) page, since the fungal sense is the more common meaning by far. --EncycloPetey 03:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splits, merges, etc. 

message: Everything's reorganized and this is now a disambiguation article. For discussion of anything other than this disambiguation article, direct any further discussion to Talk:Sporocarp (fungi), Talk:Sporocarp (ferns), Talk:Basidiocarp, or Talk:Ascocarp. Peter G Werner 23:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Done
Talk:Matinhos

message: First off, the dates need to be clarified. The statement "aros in the 1920s" is vague. Does this mean that the town was founded then (in which case, a later paragraph implies that it was in the 1820s) or is "arose" being used to mean something else here?
Next, there's some english that needs to be touched up, links need to be added for dates, places and people. The article also need categorization, and, if possible, a map image. -Harmil 20:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Bass-baritone

message: 98.193.92.75 (talk) 21:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

message: Arlington (Wakonda's Dream)      I dont know this piece; why does the link discribe this role as bass?
Bijou (Le postillon de Lonjumeau)     again, not well-known rep...
Bottom (A Midsummer Night's Dream)  I think of this, as well as
Doctor Bartolo (Il barbiere di Siviglia)     as buffo roles, not particularly calling for a Wotan.
Don Basilio (Il barbiere di Siviglia) (usually cast as a bass, however, with La calunnia transposed to C)    OK
Don Giovanni (Don Giovanni)    These next three do not belong.
Don Magnifico (La Cenerentola)
Escamillo (Carmen)
Figaro (Le nozze di Figaro)    ???
Méphistophélès (La damnation de Faust)  baritone; I'm not sure BB is required to provide the nessesary malice
Nick Shadow (The Rake's Progress)    lowest note is a Bb, isnt it?
Porgy (Porgy and Bess)     maybe
The Dutchman (Der fliegende Holländer)
Wolfram von Eschenbach (Tannhäuser)
Wotan (Der Ring des Nibelungen)    Of course; I wonder abiout Sachs
A role that perhaps should be added is Vodnik in Dvorak's Rusalka
Boris
St. Francis
Le Grand Macabre is a baritone, but sung to great effect by Willard White
70.143.77.12 08:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, the claim that the voice must have an effective range up to the F#...if bass-baritone is an intermediary register between baritone (to E4) and bass (to C4) it should be somewhere in between. I'm a baritone myself, and I don't sing up to an F#. Obviously timbre is the main factor here, not range, but it seems like the average range of a bass-baritone should be lower than that of a baritone. Keppa 03:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone deleted the whole section of pop singers citing WP:OR policy so I decided to restore it for further research on my user page: Doxent 16:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't. That note is easily belted by any baritone with a trained upper register.--I'll bring the food (Talk - Contribs - My Watchlist) 21:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous pop singers and their range

message: I was wondering whether including baritone roles which can be sung by bass-baritones (Ex. Scarpia from Tosca) should be included. Doublea 03:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some baritione roles included?

message: Hello, I've noticed there in the list (I mean kind of the form) is not Bass-baritone as a type of voice. That's a pity, isn't it? I cannot fix it... so please can somebody do it?
--ASPR 13:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If you notice in the bass-baritone article, it is listed as a sub-type of the bass voice type. The voice type template lists the major categories of voices, but does not list the plethora of sub-types found within each article.4meter4 (talk) 15:43, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  the list of type of voices
Talk:ZipSlack

message: Does anybody else have an opinion as to whether or not this article still would be considered a stub?  I do not feel that I am “qualified” to make that determination as of yet, as I am still what I would consider to be a “junior” editor.  Thanks!
fd0man 20:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the stub classification from this article.  For the distribution, I believe that this article covers everything that is relevant to an encyclopedic source.  Since nobody has commented on this in over two months, I have taken action.  —Mike Trausch (fd0man, Talk Page) 19:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub?
Talk:Harsh Mander

message: There are unusual removal of data in this page by user , instead adding cn tags.--Irshadpp (talk) 07:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: They can challenge and/or remove uncited material. They should always explain themselves in edit summaries and by responding to talk page objections such as this section though. In case of BLPs, its usually COI/PAID when there's a ton of unverified claims, there's that too. In general, any editor who wants to remove content should first search for sources themselves. Of course, any editor who objects to removal could simply reinstate content properly cited if the info is verifiable. Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia has clear cut WP:PROVEIT policy. If you add content then prove it, otherwise, be ready that this will be removed. I’m again removing content. Don’t add without sources. This is BLP.— Brihaspati (talk) 08:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content removal 

message: He left his IAS job after 2002. It had no relation with Gujarat Riot. Edit Gujarat Riot (2002) to 2002. Hdsukhadwala (talk) 21:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see the cited source.  can you respond to this, it looks like you added this information and the corresponding source. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Not done: pro forma; this is already answered RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  15:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 June 2020 

message: There really is no need to take one specific death penalty case where Mander is one of numerous signatories. Most human rights activists will tend to be anti-death penalty, not a surprise at all and not needed for the lead. Shyamal (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated out-of-context addition to lead 

message: A YouTuber has brigaded Harsh Mander. a lot of unnecessary edits will be made therefore this article should be extended-protected. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 16:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-proteced request
Talk:Susan Travers

message: There should definetely be a section on Adjutant Chef Travers since, much like Capt. Kay Somersby, she is partly well known as the mistress to a number of highly placed Free French Officers. I am currently reading her memoirs, so I will add a section if there are no objections. If there are, please mark on my Talk page V. Joe 20:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 

message: I'm certain she was survived by *both* sons. I was talking to her son, Tom just the other day, and I'm sure he said he was going to France to visit his brother (he lives in Hobart, Australia). I'll check with Tom and update if necessary.
Ian Cargill  (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-war 

message: I'm not sure what the issue is with the "matriculation" word requiring clarification. It means Susan Travers received a ID number from the French Foreign Legion. According to several sources, this number was 22166.
 Here is one source (in French): https://pupille-orphelin.fr/2021/04/09/susan-seule-femme-jamais-incorporee-dans-la-legion-etrangere/
 Also the speech Mme Simone Veil made upon being received at the French Academy, at the end of this short documentary shown on French Television: https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=842260186559617
Hut66au (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matriculation
Talk:University of Alabama School of Law

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Kenneth Randall and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 6#Kenneth Randall until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kenneth Randall" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Streaking at Dartmouth College

message: This is a response to the  concern by User:129.170.131.229 (talk | contribs) that stated the following:
All but one source is from a Dartmouth source, topic is unencyclopedic (see the recently AfD-voted deletion of Dartmouth Seven about places of fornication at Dartmouth here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dartmouth_Seven
The opposition to the Dartmouth Seven was (1) unverifiability, (2) original research, and (3) "something made up in school one day." None of these applies to Streaking at Dartmouth College: the diversity of sources cited shows that traditions like the Challenges are not hoaxes or minority concepts, but well-recognized campus traditions. The multiple articles cited devoted solely to the subject of streaking would not exist of streaking was totally irrelevant to student life. Everything in the article is cited, verifiable, and non-original research.
Since when does the location of the sources matter for making something worthwhile for inclusion? The sources are almost all from Dartmouth because this issue is about Dartmouth. If we start deleting every article that applies to a fairly closed community, I recommend that you  or delete the following, for example:
*Reed College#Trivia
*Brown University#Secret societies
*Brown University#Traditions
*Everything but a few well-known groups at Yale University#Student organizations
*Columbia University#Traditions
*University of Pennsylvania#Traditions
*Princeton University#Traditions
*May Ball
*Registrary
*Footlights
Virtually any article about a non-internationally-renowned college group or publication would meet the same objections. That's a lot of deleting. The only reason why this section isn't part of Dartmouth College like many of the "Traditions" sections above is because it's too big. (I wouldn't be opposed to integrating this article into a larger Dartmouth College traditions article).
I've been through Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not front to back, and can't find a single thing that this article violates. Please elaborate on why this article is "unencyclopedic." Dylan 20:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki>
Talk:Diethyl malonate

message: DEM also bears a striking resemblence to the Flying Spaghetti Monster.  This is not accidental; B vitamins are important for a healthy liver, which is critical to survival as a pirate.  More proof of intelligent design! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crism (talk • contribs) .
:Uh...yeah.  That probably shouldn't go in the article. Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 20:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You big silly.  That’s why it’s on the talk page! crism 20:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DEM=FSM 
Talk:Laughter yoga

message: This article is full of Scientology propaganda - see the last paragraph.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.241.166 (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, i adapted the article. please give me some feedback. if ok, i'll delete the {advertisment} --BambooBeast 12:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm the one who added the "notability" tag. If you can improve the article with better sources, etc, then feel free to remove the tag when you're done.   Will Beback  talk   00:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: This article does not seem particularly neutral, and much of it is written as if it were an advertisement or a promotional brochure for Laughter Yoga. I've added an advertisement warning as this article would likely need extensive editing to bring it to a more neutral position. I will also add a citations tag as very little of the article is properly cited. I will do some research and try to rewrite it myself as best I can. Cloventt (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: As a precurser to any further action over this article I am suggesting that a little patience while iit is pruned, to reduce the tone and to make it a smaller more rea.istyic stub.  satusuro 13:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement and notabilitiy issue
Talk:The Legend of Zelda: The Triforce Trilogy

message: Does anyone have a reliable source for one of the games being planned as an Adventure of Link remake?
:The only source I know of was ZHQ.  Land of the Legend blatantly ripped off the Wiki articles in that page they linked to, which were heavily referenced from the original ZHQ.  So we should put a "citation needed" notation by it until we have concrete evidence. --TSA 21:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I got a question regarding this, did some research and updated the correct story on LotL. I didn't work on this page yet, but it needs some correcting. Your edits are incorrect btw, as both LoZ and AoL would have been direct ports. AoL wasn't supposed to be a 'loose remake'. Hyrule 21:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't do any research, you ripped off an existing article.  You have also been verified to be an unreliable source, as is LotL - all your citations should have already been removed by Wiki Admins. --TSA 20:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adventure of Link remake
Talk:Staffordshire Moorlands

message: I added a bit about the high farmland in the area (which is naturally acidic IIRC), and its increasing dereliction. I remember this was a major concern  of the Peak Park consultation document in the mid 70s, and I don't think things have got any better for hill-agriculture since. But it's a few years since I walked up eg the West facing valleys on to Merryton Low so if someone thinks things are now better, let them say here and change. (And when I next get back home I'll have an excuse to go out for a check). Bob aka Linuxlad 21:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: State of High Farmland