lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chatfield High School (Colorado)

message: Does anyone have solid information to fill in the dates for the football player Katie Hnida on this page?  I was originally going to copy it from Hnida's article, but that page doesn't list dates, either.  I could figure it out (guessing 1998 or 1999), but without some firm information, I'm reluctant to include it in the article.  Schuminweb 00:20, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Football Career

message: The name of this school is Chatfield Senior High. The word "school" is NOT part of its name, as nearly as I can tell after consulting its web site. I propose renaming the article to "Chatfield Senior High." Lou Sander (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More problems with the name
Talk:Evolutionary epistemology

message: *What resources can people look for that approach ideas in an evolutionary epistemological approach?
*How does this approach contrast to other historical methods?
*What is the research process particular to an ev-ep approach?
*In what format does an ev-ep treatment of a topic led itself to?
--albamuth 09:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: questions for possible expansion

message: It is probably proper to isolate two distinct ideas that are both sometimes referred to as 'evolutionary epistemology' - but I don't have time to edit the page myself atm.
* A subfield of naturalized epistemology: it uses evolutionary ideas to explain how and why we know stuff - broadly speaking.
* A theory in epistemology / philosophy of science that shows how our ideas evolve over time, sometimes eerily comparable to biological evolution (an analogy, cf. Toulmin and others) or even by an algorithm that is identical to how natural selection works (cf. memetics).
Stdbrouw 20:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A confusion of two distinct ideas? 

message: I have deleted the following sentence from the text: "Brian Skyrms is a notable academic in the field." It is good to mention an author but support should be given for its inclusion, that remains, however, totally unjustified at the end of section "A branch of naturalized epistemology".--Barandiaran (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What has Brian Skyrms done? 

message: > "Popper is considered by many to have given evolutionary epistemology its first comprehensive treatment, [..]"
By whom exactly? I thought Konrad Lorenz's "Behind the Mirror" (1973) was a classic in that regard. With which work would Popper have preceded Lorenz (and they worked together) ? --217.84.90.87 (talk) 01:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Popper first on EE?
Talk:Stormfront

message: Who is the clown that labelled Stormfront as White "Supremacist"?
It has been decided it is a White Nationalist board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.136.135  (talk • contribs) 16:18, 17 November 2005
:Decided by whom? -Willmcw 20:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stormfront.org

message: The only point of a WP:disambiguation page is to direct readers to the correct article, not to explain a topic on its own. There is only one Internet forum called Stormfront.org, so we don't have to try to characterize it here in any greater detail. It has been difficulyt to establish any lasting consensus on how to characterize Stormfront.org, particularly "white nationalist" versus "white supremacist". We don't need either term on this page so let's leave that fight to the article itself.   Will Beback  talk   06:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009

message: See the second part of this edit, changing the link for here to Storm Front back to a direct link. Who agrees with me that this was correct. — RHaworth  16:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I do. Going via a pointless redirect to the Storm Front disambig seems pointless. Verbal chat 16:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Indirection

message: I don't really see why it is necessary to add  "first major 'hate' website" or "neo-nazi" to the official redirect page. Labeling it as merely 'white nationalist' - which is essentially what the site officially claims to be - would be the most ambiguous option, and it would avoid the controversy that terms like that would create. Simple is better, yes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.100.161.211 (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding Stormfront.org's definition
Talk:Anna Millward

message: Obviously, there is much more to this person's biography than the lidocaine incident and the rest will be supplied in the course of time. However, since Millward described the incident as the worst experience of her athletic career, to not mention it would be a bit censorious, not to mention a violation of NPOV.
JFPerry 00:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we get a RS for this?--Malerooster (talk) 02:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lidocaine section
Talk:Penicillium chrysogenum/Archive 1

message: Penicillium notatum is better known as Penicillium chrysogenum, having only 46,900 google hits instead of the latter's 89,000 google hits.  P. chrysogenum is the older name, and according to this website, when penicillin was isolated, they "identified the mold ... as P. notatum. Later it was found that P. notatum was actually the same species as Penicillium chrysogenum, which, being an older name, became the correct name for the species".  Should I move this article?  --Ratiocinate 01:06, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Canadian Pacific Air Lines

message: A 1947 photo clearly show a plane with the lettering "Canadian Pacific Airlines" . Accordingly, I have renamed from "Canadian Pacific Air Lines". -- Curps 01:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The airline was founded in March 1942 as "Canadian Pacific Air Lines" (first timetable here ). The name was changed to "Canadian Pacific Airlines" in 1947. In 1968 the name "CP Air" was adopted. On 17th Dezember 1985 the airline adopted its original - not its second - name again and operated as "Canadian Pacific Air Lines" from 1986 onwards untill it was merged with PWA in 1987 (April 1986 timetable )  . --Jewido (talk) 12:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Why is the fatal '53 Catalina crash under "other incidents"?-- 09:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  miscategorization 

message: Canadian Pacific disappeared in 1987 and there was no concept known as hubs back then - not in Canada at least.  Should the wording be changed to "home base" instead? --JNZ 02:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hubs? 

message: Image is still pending deletion tho decided to keep? What to do about it? Ohwell32 10:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: image

message: I rated today's version of the article as "C" class. While it is of reasonable length, it is short of references - once that improves it might qualify for a "B" rating.  PKT(alk) 21:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: 68.147.238.171 (talk) 16:10, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A good thing you enter discussion, though the thought is late in coming to you ... The Trans Canada Air Lines (sic!) article does indeed mention two surviving aircraft. The one entry is properly referenced, the other isn't and is also poorly written; you may well have triggered its removal, I think it has been hitherto overlooked. Referencing is crucial on Wikipedia: you confirm the info as being an ex-employee of CP Air and I do not think anybody doubts you or your facts; but that is not sufficient, reliable references are required. Thanks for going along! Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Surviving aircraft are not really noteworthy to include in these articles so I contest the addition here. I have raised it at project level at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Airlines#Surviving_Aircraft, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

text: It still not something that we do on airline articles and none of the aircraft are on display by the airline, perhaps take to the airline project and make a suggestion to gain a consensus. MilborneOne (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Survivors category
Talk:Floyd Little

message: Is Floyd Little in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, too?  162.84.72.171 01:17, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, here's a list on the HOF site.  His contemporary Larry Little is a member. ×Meegs 09:23, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Parts of this article are written as if the AFL never existed, and as if Floyd Little started his career in the NFL.  That is a gross distortion of history and needs to be corrected.  Someone more familiar with the style for doing this, as demonstrated with other athletes and teams, would likely do a better job than I would.  If this still hasn't been fixed when I retire, maybe I will come back and figure out how to fix it properly. 42GeoCPU (talk) 00:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL versus AFL
Talk:Olympic Oval

message: I added the photo of inside the oval. I also have some outside shots. should they be added or would that be too much?- Dr Haggis - Talk 01:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless the article grows in size I think the one image should suffice. As it stands the page looks quite good, and more images would only serve clutter it up. Besides, the image you've provided is perfectly illustrative of what the building's functions are, and I can't imagine any outside shot would better convey to readers what exactly goes on at The Oval (and thanks for removing the stub: I completely forgot about it) --93JC 05:26, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...because "It has been the site of 17 of 30 world records." No mention of Zamboni machines, climate control or high altitude in the source. – Wbm1058 (talk) 19:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known as "Fastest ice in the world" 

message: I flagged this article for missing citations because there are no citations in the "Other Activities" section
--Maestroso simplo (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More citations needed
Talk:Gǀui dialect

message: I got the click inventory from a summary in Collins & Bell 2001 (ref. at ‡Hõã) rather than directly from Nakagawa. It may be worthwhile for someone to verify the data. At the least, this should show whether all 48 potential click consonants are attested. 
Collins & Bell may have reanalysed some of Nakagawa's data, so if there are discrepancies, it might be best to mention that in notes rather than deleting the info here. kwami 01:45, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Got one of N's later papers. There are 52 clicks; filled out the rest of the inventory but left out most phonotactic constraints. kwami 01:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Simple clicks	affricated clicks	affricated clicks	'sharp' clicks	'sharp' clicks
Simple clicks	dental           	lateral          	alveolar      	palatal
Look at this section of the table alone. This makes no sense. One of these is a label of a cluster of row labels, and the rest are normal labels of columns. @Fdom5997 If you are going to claim that this setup makes sense, explain how. Eievie (talk) 01:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labels of labels
Talk:Nightmare (Zelda)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Nightmare (Zelda) → Nightmare (Legend of Zelda) → The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening -- Name is not specific enough. Moved original page content( which, following my merge into the Link's Awakening article, is a redirect) to Nightmare (Legend of Zelda). This created a double redirect, but it's not worth changing this redirect to point directly at The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening, because no one is likely to ever type "Nightmare (Zelda)" into the address bar, and no links to it exist( I just changed the last one to point to "Nightmare (Legend of Zelda)" directly). -- WikidSmaht (talk) 04:36, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
** Seems fairly harmless. (Also, has already been fixed to point to target.) Noel (talk) 01:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Killian Nine

message: get out of here, my sister is in Wikipedia!!!!
(Raniya 05:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I placed a POV check tag on this article.  From what I could gather from the sources cited at the bottom of the article, the pamphlet in question did not merely criticize school policies.  It also included one student fantasizing about killing the principal, teachers, and fellow students.  An editor familiar with the original pamphlet needs to edit this article to better reflect its contents and explain why authorities might legitimately be concerned.--FreeKresge 02:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Issues

message: In response to the criticism, I have added a description of the controversial elements of the pamphlet.  Unfortunately, more detailed sources, such as the Miami Herald archives, are not available on the free web.  I cannot find a copy of the pamphlet itself online.  I remember it had other material that might be worth describing, but I cannot find a detailed description of it.  
Danqueray (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Citations
Talk:Perizaad Zorabian

message: I don't know anything about her or her husband but what's included in this bio seems excessive and very unencyclopedaeic. - AKeen 20:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Tone 

message: The details mentioned in the 'Personal Life' section don't all seem relevant, as there seems to be an extensive list of all the events that Perizaad has attended and all the causes that she supports.
While all the information provided is adequately supported by references, I don't think that all of it is applicable in the aforementioned section, which in my opinion should only include information about her family, and hobbies, if any.
If the information mentioned is deemed to be relevant, I can help reword the section and abridge it, if need be. CBhat109 (talk) 13:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life
Talk:Convention Parliament (England)

message: I thought the defining feature of a Convention Parliament is that is not summoned by the Crown but by some alternate authority, such as the senior prince of the blood royal or the previous revolutionary government. J S Ayer 03:00, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: These "Addled Parliament"-type titles are not only retardataire they aren't even very useful, as in this case.  I was simply looking for the Parliament of 1689. Isn't that the best title? --Wetman 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elections in Germany

message: From the article:
:The Federal Diet (Bundestag) has 603 members, elected for a four year term, 299 members elected in single-seat constituencies according to first-past-the-post, while a further 299 members are allocated from statewide party
What about the other four seats?
:See change in article?
Overhang mandates -- till we ☼☽ | Talk 09:47, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The data appears to be incorrect in the chart. It isn't holding up to the scrutiny of addition or multiplication with its variables. Can someone please confirm its accuracy?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.78.42.94 (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Data Incorrect?

message: Can I request a section that details how the votes are counted, and other practicalities of conducting the election? Or if that's covered in another article, a link would be good Kisch 23:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Method of counting

message: I know this was discussed somewhat above -- 4 years ago -- but I was wondering if anyone would object if I created a separate page for the GDR's last (and only free) election, which took place in 1990.  Right now the data from that election is sort of hidden away on the People's Chamber page, when it would be useful to have the election results themselves be linkable.  My proposed title would be East German election, 1990, unless someone has a better idea.  --Jfruh (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooops, I see the article does exist: East German general election, 1990.  Should be linked to more thoroughly, I think. --Jfruh (talk) 03:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDR 1990 election 

message: There is a reason why all this article is upside down? This article is part of an encyclop[a]edia, THE ENCYCLOPEDIA, and not a curriculum vitae, a TV/media report, or a blog where topics are displayed in reverse chronological order (with newest entries first). Thanks! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 17:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological order
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Fake color articles

message: I can see already that this is going to be a thorny one to figure out, so I'm going to attempt to break down the votes by color here. -- BD2412 talk 03:08, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently 15 separate nominations would have been easier after all.  I'll know better next time!  dbenbenn | talk 16:15, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe not 15... combination noms would work fine for the four combination colors (Olive-yellow, Pink-cerise, etc.), and for the two mineral colors (Feldspar (color) and Sphaerocobaltite (color)). -- BD2412 talk 16:29, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I thought I presented a good solution to satisfy everyone which I thought was highly suggested by wikipedia:voting. There is an article list of colors which consolidates each of these articles into a single line. The people voting deletion will be happy to get rid of the articles and the people voting keep will be happy because the most important information is still there.Vicarious 21:03, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Solution?
Talk:Synovial membrane

message: The article says these apply to joints that have cavities. Can we have an example of some joints with cavities and some without? RJFJR 03:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: examples joints

message: this is a really poorly written article.. it needs help badly. How do you flag this page for a cleanup/re-write?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcal (talk • contribs) 06:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLEANUP 

message: I would suggest at least mentioning the term "synoviocytes" and explaining what it means. If the author(s) do not want to use it for some reason, then they can briefly explain why they don't want to use it. Thomas.Hedden (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synoviocytes 

message: this is a really poorly written article.. it needs help badly. How do you flag this page for a cleanup/re-write?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcal (talk • contribs) 06:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLEANUP 

message: I would suggest at least mentioning the term "synoviocytes" and explaining what it means. If the author(s) do not want to use it for some reason, then they can briefly explain why they don't want to use it. Thomas.Hedden (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synoviocytes 

message: Can information be added to the article on the negative effects of regular cycling on the synovial joints? Does long-term regular cycling permanently wear out the cartilage, synovial tissue, synovial membrane or any other part of the knee joints? Cartilage does not heal from damage, so any damage is permanent. Wsmss (talk) 13:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative health effects of cycling? 

message: This statement is misleading, as most cells (if not all?) are thinner than a piece of paper.  After all, individual cells need to be viewed under a microscope to be seen.  I propose removing this part of the sentence: "consists of a sheet of cells thinner than a piece of paper" FishAmplexity (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The inner layer, or intima, consists of a sheet of cells thinner than a piece of paper."
Talk:Flag of Louisiana

message: Hmm! I see a pelican, communism, a sortof wheel! Everything but DNA! 69.142.2.68 03:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you saying?75.131.224.220 (talk) 05:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Huh? --DodgerOfZion 09:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF? 

message: No drops of blood. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arthurian Legend (talk • contribs) .
:Done. Refresh the page.- Thanks, Hoshie 07:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the blood in the picture? 

message: I'm sorry but although the official state bird IS a Brown Pelican  on the flag its a White Pelican  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rynosaur (talk • contribs) 22:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brown Pelican

message: and  should be included. I'm not qualified enough to write appropriate captions. --Beao 22:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pelicans 
Category talk:Athletics (track and field) venues

message: The subcategories with "stadia" need to be re-named to "stadiums", or preferably "venues".  They should also be renamed "track and field" instead of "athletics", if appropriate.
:"Track and field" is only used in the United States. it is this category itself which should be renamed to comply with the name used for the sport itself in Wikipedia. CalJW 01:26, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: cleancat
Talk:Max Perlich

message: I think it wise to develop this page a little beyond what was in the AMG entry.Bjones
I agree; I have insufficient information to develop it, though.  --Nlu 03:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Curiously, considering I found tens of thousands of hits on him, I found very little biographical detail. His Dad is a professional interviewer, as well as novelist and so forth, but I found no interviews of Max whatsoever. Outside of being the the odd "little" guy in a few shows I've watched I don't know much about him. (I'm meaning little in terms of average male height. He's probably over 50 centimeters taller than me)--T. Anthony 08:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Uniting for Consensus

message: In 2009 started new negotiations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.246.117.48 (talk) 14:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Udpdate needed 

message: I would really appreciate a citation on the bit about which countries oppose each G4 nation. --Puck85 05:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some are there. Skinnyweed 22:40, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be fgood if there will be also written waht the different countries tried so they reach their goals. --134.147.29.139 12:54, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation!! 

message: I'm just curious as to why the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is listed as a see also.  There isn't and direct mention of it in the article and there isn't any implied connection that I can glean from the article.  Mystache 18:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the relevance either. --Bjarki 23:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCO Relevance? 

message: I am trying to find some information to add to this article about the conference in Mexico referenced in this UN News Centre article. All I could really find was this Associated Press of Pakistan article which says that 29 states attended the conference in Mexico, but I couldn't find a list of the states attending, or anything about the conference at all for that matter, on the Government of Mexico site. Mathew5000 (talk) 02:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2011 conference in Mexico 

message: Called the 'Coffee Club', but why? Do the like coffee? Perhaps, but I'm sure the Pakistanis prefer tea. Do they produce coffee? Not something Italy is really known for. Maybe its a disparaging nickname, e.g. All the do is talk and drink coffee. It would be nice to know. The only place I could find that claimed to 'explain' it was centerforunreform.org , they said: 'They are known as the Coffee Club because it is reminiscent of the powerful lobby opposing the expansion of permanent membership in the early 1990s.' but that doesn't really explain anything does it? What powerful lobby and what did it have to do with coffee?
Some anon ip (talk) 00:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems to be an internal informal nickname, which it's probably not worth trying to understand in detail... AnonMoos (talk) 03:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the nickname? 