lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Europe belief in god.png

message: The new colour scheme is not functional, the degrees of purple are intuitive (understandable without legend) and show a trend, the new colour scheme mainly provides a lollypop image; which is hard to interpret. I would strongly urge to reinstate the previous version. Arnoutf 22:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New colour scheme

message: Why is Turkey included in the European countries? Officially it's an Asian country and not part of the EU yet. So it shouldn't be included in this map. Iaberis 15:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts also. Computerjoe's talk 15:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to disagree. European Union ≠ Europe (political union ≠ geographical location). Norway is not in the European Union, but I doubt anyone would dare say that it's not a European country. Same goes for Iceland, Switzerland, Croatia, Serbia, Ukraine, and probably some others I can't name right now.And, a part of Turkey is in Europe (also see the lead to the Turkey article). Puchiko (Talk-email) 16:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WRONG MAP

message: This image shows the percentage of people who are registered member of a church. In Germany it shows the percentage of people who pay the church tax which means that they are a registered member of a protestant or catholic church, but this doesn't mean that the rest of the inhabitants doesn't believe in God. Estonia and the Czech Republic are white - people livin there don't believe in God at all?
Johnny2323 (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in the Czech Republic, I think there are about 40% of Christians, so it's not that small a number. The statues among the roads were built when there were far more Christians. And we aren't going to take down statues that are hundreds of years old, that would be vandalism. Puchiko (Talk-email) 11:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name!
Talk:Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty

message: I posted a copy from the section of Byzantine Empire as a guide by which to revise this article to make it unique. Get creative, change the maps, add a lot of original information! Monsieurdl 13:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess then I have the green light to completely re-write this?! yeah!! It will take some time but here it goes Tourskin 20:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Adapt this page to give it life
Talk:The Doll

message: I think none of the 35 links to this page (The Doll) intend to go to Summer of the Seventeenth Doll, they all are meant for the Seinfeld episode. Now, after the move of the Seinfeld episode article, they land on the article for the Australian play. 's assertion that "The Doll" is the popular name for the Australian play "Summer of the Seventeenth Doll" seems without foundation to me.
I suggest there was never any ambiguity and the move should be undone. Michael Bednarek 13:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why move '''The Doll''' to [[The Doll (Seinfeld episode)]] and Redirect to [[Summer of the Seventeenth Doll]]?
Talk:Anurag

message: 27.255.197.16 (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Anurag Sai Gupta does not have a Wikipedia article, so cannot be included - Arjayay (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2017
Talk:Hurricane High School (West Virginia)

message: According to Wikipedia naming conventions for U.S. schools, this page is appropriately named.  The format of School (City/Municipality, State) is only appropriate when there is more than one school in the state which it is located with the same name.
The decision for the present format was made after the previous proposal, which mandated that all pages follow the School (City/Municipality, State), was rejected by the community.
I can understand that confusion, though.  I took a few moments to notice the "This proposal has been rejected..." box at the top of the latter policy page.  I'm going to go ahead and remove the tag requesting the page be moved.
--TarrVetus (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Need to Move This Page Any Further
Talk:Child Support Policy in the United States

message: It is realized that child support policy is a contentous and emotional subject. Those of you with strong feelings and personal perspective are asked not to do things that may be considered to be vandalism. If you are not an expert and wish to question information in the article, go first to reference material where you may find answers. Then if you wish, please discuss them here. This is not a battleground for personal grievances or a bulletin board to market policy preferences. Also, keep in mind that this is currently a stub and needs further development. Rogerfgay 13:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement of Neutrality 

message: Articles have been written on "child support" and "child support in the United States" that are currently under review as too narrowly focused and inappropriately named. The idea of this article came out of those discussions. This is not a duplication of the ideas in those other articles, as it is not expected that an article with such a general title as "Child Support Policy in the United States" will focus on specific policies and administrative procedures of a particular agency or official (narrow) POV of such agencies, etc. Instead, the scope will be broader, focusing on broad policy analysis with strong factual roots. Enough is understood about this subject, that it is believed that the entry will be quite authoritative. Rogerfgay 13:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Scope 

message: Article has been redirected to Child support in the United States as a result of the AfD discussion/vote. - Mike Rosoft 12:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child Support Policy‎]]
Talk:A628 road

message: I can't find anything defining where the Woodhead Pass section starts and finishes. Can anyone help? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's a definitive answer. There's no obvious narrow section. You might consider that Longdendale (the valley of the River Etherow) is part of the pass (in which case it would start from somewhere like Tintwistle in the west), or you might decide that it only refers to the high section over the watershed above the Woodhead Tunnel. On the eastern side there's no obvious valley, the road just runs down the side of a hill to the Flouch roundabout and the junction with the A616. Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodhead Pass
Talk:Presiding Officer (ARB)

message: I had an earlier draft in my user space, which I temporarily pasted in here, and am now deleting...  Geo Swan 13:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier draft

message: :Thank's for asking me about my rational for adding the  tag. Many of the reasons are already self explained by a brief look at the article and a look at the other tags and page history. Here is the summary. 
:* The article is solely based on two primary sources closely affiliated with the subject. 
:* No references that appear in reliable third-party publications.
:* Article is part of the highly controversial topic Guantanamo. 
:* Main parts has been written by just one author.
:* The articles solely author has show a strong POV.
:* NPOV needs to be checked as it is solely base on United States government documents.
:* Some information in the article are not verified by the sources.
It is the large sum and combination of all these factors that make me believe that the tag is justified. No objection for removal after a substantial amount of these problems have been fixed. IQinn (talk) 09:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no real suggestion that anything in this article is actually in question. Unless and until that becomes the case these tags are spurious. Rich Farmbrough, 04:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation for the misleading tag
Talk:Child Support Policy

message: It is realized that child support policy is a contentous and emotional subject. Those of you with strong feelings and personal perspective are asked not to do things that may be considered to be vandalism. If you are not an expert and wish to question information in the article, go first to reference material where you may find answers. Then if you wish, please discuss them here. This is not a battleground for personal grievances or a bulletin board to market policy preferences. Also, keep in mind that this is currently a stub and needs further development. Rogerfgay 13:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement of Neutrality 

message: Articles have been written on "child support" and "child support in the United States" that are currently under review as too narrowly focused and inappropriately named. The idea of this article came out of those discussions. This is not a duplication of the ideas in those other articles, as it is not expected that an article with such a general title as "Child Support Policy" will focus on specific policies and administrative procedures of a particular agency in a particular country or official (narrow) POV of such agencies, etc. Instead, the scope will be broader, focusing on broad policy analysis with strong factual roots. Enough is understood about this subject, that it is believed that the entry will be quite authoritative. Rogerfgay 13:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We have article talkpages to propose article subject matter forks.  Starting a new article with a statement of concept is completely the wrong way to go about it and this article should be deleted as it isn't actually an article.  Besides, I at least am still unconvinced that there is any need for a separate article at this time.  Expand the existing articles on the topic(s) and discuss forking content into sub articles on the existing article talkpages.--Isotope23 talk 13:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Scope 

message: Article has been redirected to Child support as a result of the AfD discussion/vote. - Mike Rosoft 12:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child Support Policy‎]]
Talk:Ikazuchi-class destroyer

message: Although the article notes that all of these ships were named after celestial phenomena, their names are given in (transliterated) Japanese only.  It's too bad that translations of the names are not provided, at least to the language of this encyclopedia.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 23:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Five of the names are celestial phenomena: Ikazuchi (thunder), Inazuma (lightning), Niji (rainbow), Akebono (dawn), Oboro (moonlight), but Sazanami means "ripple". Gdr 14:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations?

message: All the ships in this article are said to have been built by Yarrows on the Clyde between 1897 and 1899. However Yarrow Shipbuilders states that Yarrows moved from London between 1906 and 1909. Can anyone clarify, or is this article just making an assumption that the ships were built on the Clyde?  Pterre (talk) 10:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've amended the article. To quote from Kings of Commerce by Thomas Charles Bridges (1928): "When, in the early years of this century, Alfred Yarrow decided to remove the works .. which had grown .. to be one of the biggest on the Thames .. the site selected for the new works was on the Clyde .. between 4000 and 5000 tons of material had to be transported .. everything from ..models to the heaviest machine tools. .. a train-load of from forty to fifty wagons left the works at Poplar every day. On July 14, 1908, the first destroyer was launched from the new works at Scotstoun. Pterre (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clyde or Thames? 

message: I see  DYKHousekeepingBot has just caught up with this article. For the record the information in DYK was incorrect - the ships were built on the Thames at Poplar, London Pterre (talk) 01:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   DYKHousekeepingBot
Template talk:IrelandByYear

message: I have copied the code from this template and this revision to create Template:NorwayByYear. Therefore, if changes are made to this template it would be nice if the Norwegian template got the benefit of relevant fixes and improvements. __meco (talk) 19:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of about 7,000 templates only 16 are rated for "importance" - a fairly random selection. I'm re-setting those 16 to importance = na. Sarah777 (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template code copied
Talk:Postal codes in Argentina

message: It is which of the three parts of the CPA are mandatory and which not. This should be clarified  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.90.204 (talk) 06:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mandatory parts? 

message: What is the zip code for Westside la Beverly hills 2600:1012:B120:8B19:0:7:C12B:4E01 (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zip cose
Talk:Remote Differential Compression

message: I guess this is similar to rsync, anyone with knowledge of the details that can list similarities and differences?
--Fstanchina (talk) 10:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities to rsync? 

message: Aside from a few apps like VNC, I don't see any apps that use this.  A file-copy app like robocopy would be really fricking useful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbourgon (talk • contribs) 16:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any apps that use it?
Talk:HMS Unrivalled

message: There is a double period after Paola A.
:Fixed. Thanks for catching that.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:41, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?

message: Where did this sub operate from during the last two years of World War II? Even if she didn't sink any ships in this period, where she was located should be mentioned. Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I can't answer that. She was probably in the Med, but sources mention that a number of the class became training subs late in the war, without mentioning which ones.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last two years of World War II 
Talk:HMS Untamed

message: The sinking section appears to be a verbatim lift from here.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  10:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this as a replacement section - I've avoided looking at the blanked material.
Untamed was on a training exercise with the 8th Escort Group in the Clyde on 30 May 1943 acting as a target.RN Submarine Museum 
In the second exercise that day, Untamed was used as a target for anti-submarine mortar practice by the yacht Shemara. When the submarine did not respond to attempts to contact it nor surface, assistance was summoned. Shemara located Untamed with sonar and heard the sounds of its engines being run and tanks being blown. HMS Thrasher arrived but no more was heard from Untamed after 17:45 – nearly three hours from the first indication of a problem. Weather prevented divers inspecting the submarine until the 1st June. There was no outward sign of damage and it was not until after Untamed was salvaged on 5 July 1943 that it was found that she had been flooded through a sluice valve.
GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: [this by a writer and  this at Maritim Quest have some more detail on the subject. GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Article has now been rewritten so that any copyvio problem that may have existed has now been resolved. Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:HMS Usurper

message: My late grandad, Mr William Charles Binns, from Aintree in Liverpool, served in the Royal Navy, during the second world war, on-board HMS Usurper! The submarine!
Just before Usurper was about to set off on its ultimate voyage , my Grandad became seriously unwell and visited the subs on-board doctor who realised he was quite seriously ill immediately, therefore ordering my Grandad to leave the submarine as he was too unwell to carry on serving aboard HMS Usurper for the time being!
My Grandad of course,followed orders and went home!
But unfortunately the news soon came in that my Grandads submarine he had just gotten off had been torpedoed by the Japanese and completely anialated, killing every member of the crew onboard!
All of my Grandads good friends and fellow naval Officers and the gentlemen who ranked above him were dead! 
But strangely and fortunately for us, something made my Grandad become sick. Making him leave the submarine almost immediately.
 This in turn saved his life!
Crazy or what!? And my Grandad lived a long, healthy and prosperous life, going on to adopt my father and his sister!
now, how about that for a gut instinct yet?! 2.216.41.33 (talk) 09:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has Hurled ( my grandad served in the Royal Navy, on-board HIS Usurper!
Talk:HMS Uther

message: I just edited the uboat.net link in the references section.  The number was wrong in the URL.  I mention it here because I wonder if those numbers are stable?  If they're not then it doesn't make a very good reference link. WillUther (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:HMS P38 (1941)

message: This can be found here, for those interested:
http://crusaderproject.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/sinking-of-hm-submarine-p-38-23-february-1942/ 86.25.198.228 (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report of the sinking - from commander of RM Circe 

message: This confirms that she rose twice. There are some errors in it though, e.g. that Circe used hydrophones to locate P.38 - she used sonar (ASDIC) of German origin.  It also says that the convoy consisted only of three merchants, while in reality there were six. 86.25.198.228 (talk) 22:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Staff History 

message: There isn't really that much more to say about P.38, given her short career. So I am a bit bemused by the start rating, since this article is pretty exhaustively covering her career. 193.128.202.131 (talk) 10:44, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rating?
Talk:Coppice, Greater Manchester

message: The article claims a population of over 2,000,000, implying that all but a couple of hundred thousand of the residents of Greater Manchester live in this one locality. Shurely shome mishtake? Dricherby (talk) 08:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:J-class blimp

message: According to ZNN, J-class blimps have been designated “ZNN-J”, but this is not mentioned in the article. According to MOS:DABMENTION, the link on the Dab page would have to be removed. TowerDragon (talk) 01:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: “ZNN-J” designation
Talk:N-class blimp

message: I just read your article on Navy blimps and congratulate you for its quality.  It did contain a tiny problem:  You state that the ZPG2W version of the Nan ships carried a crew of 21.  I was a Naval Aviagtor assigned to squadron ZW1 and flew many patrols in these things in 1958-59.  We always took 25 men - two crews of 12 men each plus the 25th man, who supposedly served as the rigger and the cook.  In actual practice however, he was any E2 seaman in the squadron who needed hours in order to get his flight pay.  This made for some interesting meals on board.
  
James Brown (Formerly LTJG James Brown)
924 Fredonia Ave
Fredonia, WI 53021
redjimb@yahoo.com
65.30.171.213 (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

message: The ZPG-3W was actually an entirely new aircraft. perhaps it should have a separate section in this article.
---
I have no idea why this page even goes into the ZPG-3W and Airlander 10 at all, but at least it should try to get the facts straight if it does. It's hopelessly faulty as it stands. The gas capacity of the ZPG-3W was 42,500 m^3, not 23,648 m^3. This is significant because it means the ZPG-3W remains the largest nonrigid airship ever built. Fnj2 (talk) 11:12, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted Greglocock (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ZPG-3W problem 
Talk:Data Processing

message: The two articles Data Processing and Data processing bearing the same name (but an uppercase) and discussing similar but distinct subjects, they should be either merged, or renamed properly.  Yes...it is destiny.
I support merging the two versions (with & without a capital "P" into one.
However, I take exception to the view that data processing transforms data into information.  
Data can be defined as "Recorded, ordered symbols or signals that carry information and patterns that describe or define a concept or object."
Information can be defined as "Meaning and context arising from processing, interpreting, or translating data to extract an underlying message or pattern."
Although processing is one way to produce information, in the sense of standard report generation, it isn't the primary way. And even here, it's a strech because a human had to predetermine how to interpret data so that it would yield information. Information is generally considered a human construct - beyond the ken of machines.  And procesing does many things that don't result in the generation of information, such as coding, cleaning, validation, organizing... 
My message, for what it's worth, is that to state that the purpose of processing is to transform data into information is weak, at best, and bordering on incorrect.  However, I chose not to rewrite the entire article based on one person's opinion.
Albert Simard (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Hessel Gerritsz

message: try here for a portrait Victuallers 14:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a portrait of Gerbrand Brederode by Hessel Gerritsz. Afasmit (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Smyrk

message: Replaced the quoted contents with wikified references.  Any other quotes were removed. 
Dqswim 14:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CorenSearchBot 

message: This section feels like it falls too far into bias/testimonials and not encyclopedic content? Withdrawretreat (talk) 04:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media coverage
Talk:Europe by Satellite

message: Here is a list of all the language channels of EbS. Can anyone identify the unidentified languages?
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/t90.rm (en)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/t91.rm (or)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/ta0.rm (de)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/ta1.rm (fr)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tb0.rm (dk/se?)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tb1.rm (nl)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tc0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tc1.rm (fi)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/td0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/td1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/te0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/te1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tf0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tf1.rm (it)
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tg0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tg1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/th0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/th1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/ti0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/ti1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tj0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tj1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tk0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tk1.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tl0.rm
rtsp://streamebs.cec.eu.int/broadcast/tl1.rm
– Kaihsu 14:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: language channels
Talk:SM City Pampanga

message: How is Ace Hardware an attraction??? :D It's a hardware store for pete's sake Jameson L. Tai 14:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attractions 

message: "" It has the largest land area of 316,000 m² among SM Supermalls. ""
How about SM Lanang Premier? 640,000 m² 
Funbeta 09:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Land Area?