lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ernulf

message: According to Wharton: "Arnulfus.  Extat enim in Archivis Ecclesiae Cant. Charta autographa Arnulfi Prioris Roffensis; subscribunt Letardus Portarius & Henricus filius ejus.".  Greenway says "Thought to have been prior of Rochester before he became prior of Canterbury", but claims an absence of records.  There is a well-worn dictum that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", so Greenway is not claiming that Ernulf was not Prior of Rochester, just that she has no evidence that he was.  IT is a pity that Wharton does not identify the manuscript, but the WP citation police were absent 300-odd years ago.  Comments?  Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:48, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: a 20th century source that neglects to corroborate a 17th century source is enough in my mind to consider the 17th century source unreliable. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Note also the ODNB entry for Ernulf which makes no mention of him being prior of Rochester. If Diana Greenway and Peter Cramer both neglect to mention him holding any such office, it is pretty much assured that he did not. Greenway's entry is "Ernulph thought to have been prior of Rochester before he became prior of Canterbury in 1096 (Mon. Ang. 1 157; Ang. Sac. 1 392 etc.). But never occ. as prior of Rochester, and occ. as monk of Christ Church, Canterbury, after 1094" means that since after 1094 he was still being referred to as just a monk of Canterbury, and NOT at Rochester. If he had been prior of Rochester, the documents would have said he was prior of Rochester rather than the lesser title of plain monk and would have placed him at Rochester, rather than at Canterbury. Many of the 17th and 18th sources have been shown to be incorrect or based on forged documents. Ealdgyth - Talk 02:09, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Heads of Religious Houses: England & Wales I. 940-1216 (second edition) by David Knowles, C. N. L. Brooke, and Vera C. London on page 63 give an "?Arnulf D. -1113 (Roul. Morts., p. 203)" as prior, but this cannot be Ernulf since Arnulf was prior until 1113. Ealdgyth - Talk 02:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed about the second man as separate.  Wharton lists them as Arnulfus and Ernulfus II.  Page uses Ernulf and Ernulf II whilst Hastead names them as Arnulph and Ernulf II.  Greenway doesn't mention the second man at all. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior of Rochester?
Talk:Erskine Barton Childers

message: I am not sure how he is listed as a member of Fine Gael party in the box. To my knowledge he was never linked to any political party in Ireland. 
Erskine H. Childers ( President of Ireland ) was a member for over 40 years of Fianna Fail party.
Robert Erskine Childers was a member of Sinn Fein party. ChildersFamily (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erskine B. was never a member of Fine Gael Party
Talk:Esequiel Hernández Jr.

message: It may be misleading to say Esequiel Hernandez is the first American citizen killed by the U.S. military since Kent State.  A significant number of American citizens have been killed by American soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen since that time - probably in most cases while the servicemen were on leave, off duty or AWOL.  Many other citizens have died as a result of vehicular and other accidents caused by servicemen, as well.  Presumably Mr. Hernandez was the first intentionally killed during a military operation.  This is significant, but hardly the first killing of a citizen by servicemen since Kent State.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JFrawley032759 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While on duty is the qualifier. MMetro (talk) 03:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who prosecuted his murder?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.136.219.162 (talk) 12:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Justice Department, Department of the Navy and the local prosecutor declined to prosecute the killing.Jeff (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It might be obvious, but he did shoot at them first. Legally speaking, that isn't murder, is self-defense. V. Joe (talk) 01:52, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He did not "shoot at them." The marines were camouflaged and presumed to be invisible to Hernandez. It is not self-defense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperliner (talk • contribs) 09:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prosecutor 

message: The Marines were not on a drug patrol.  They had been on a training mission to observe drug activity, had completed that mission, and were waiting to be picked up.  They were uphill and well camoflaged and they had no need to follow Hernandez at all.
65.68.190.60 (talk) 22:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The marines were not on a drug patrol 

message: Saying that the Ken State shooting was from United States Armed Forces is misleading and imprecise.  At the time of the event, the National Guard Soldiers were not Federalized and were under the command of the State Governor, not the Federal Government.  Check the difference between title 10 and title 32 status for National Guard as it pertains to Defense Support to Civil Authorities.
:Yep, I fixed the issue, considering the statement is very misleading, as the National Guard are not active duty personnel. XXzoonamiXX (talk) 07:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken State: National Guard under Title 32 vs Title 10
Talk:Ettore Tolomei

message: ... he not only retained his title of senator, but resumed as a ...
:Comment: Nowhere does it say how or when he gained the title "senator" in the first place.  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Senator?

message: Removed the POV tag, which has been up for over a year now without any discussion taking place. Pcassitti (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag
Talk:Aquaphilia (fetish)

message: This page has been created from the last good edit of the original Aquaphilia page which has now been turned into a disambig page.
Tramlink 19:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Is that just objectophilia? 72.72.203.78 (talk) 14:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about sexual attraction to the body of water itself?
Talk:Eudoxus of Cyzicus

message: I was thinking, if the Indian sailors were already using the Monsoon system for navigation, how come the Greeks 'Discovered' it? They simply learnt it from Indians.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.140.46.5 (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery of Monsoon System for Navigation 
Talk:Kurdish Institute of Paris

message: No way US Patent application for 8 (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliate to Kurdistan? 

message: The article Kurmancî (magazine) does not appear to meet notability guidelines and should likely be merged to Kurdish Institute of Paris. Straughn (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:WDKN

message: The dates of his work as the station's engineer are approximate. My memories (I'm his grandson) go back to approximately 1961, when he was already working as the engineer. I assume that his work dates back to the beginning of the station, but never discussed this with him, so I am uncertain about this. As he reached - and passed - retirement age, he eventually retired as engineer, if I remember correctly, in the early 90s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.216.19 (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the 1956 Broadcasting Yearbook, the station's first chief engineer was named Richard Essner. - Dravecky (talk) 07:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: L.D. Filson

message: This station is now being simulcast on 101.5 FM.  Does anyone know if this is a separately-licensed station, a translator, or what? 2600:1004:B160:D835:BC18:5518:499A:2A0F (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  FM
Talk:Alpha Industries

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.alphaindustries.com/history.asp. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Infanta Sofía of Spain

message: Sofia is quite well known now, so maybe more sections in the article could be added?
--Alice.pinder (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can add sourced and relevant information, please feel free to do so. Surtsicna (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information? 
Talk:Walter Hayes

message: I think a link should be added to Walter Hayes's Wikipedia page, to the new, online archive about Walter Hayes: walterhayes.co.uk.
This is because walterhayes.co.uk contains content (transcripts, original article scans, photography) from four UK national newspapers and 12 magazines, all of which have authorised just walterhayes.co.uk to carry their copyrighted material.
Richard Hayes
Richard Hayes (talk) 10:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding a link to the walterhayes.co.uk 
Talk:Bold Lane

message: I don't think that anyone in security would recognize a parking garage as a secure place.  Compare, for example to the deck of a submarine, a bank vault, or a prison.  The article lacks NPV, and is being reverted by violet/riga.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.81.161.25 (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The references prove the claim.  violet/riga (t) 22:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The references only prove the claim because the claim is fuzzy, and not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  "Recognized" without a statement of by whom it is recognized is silly.  The BBC doing two stories doesn't mean it's recognized by serious practitioners in the field.  At best, it means it has been written about by a journalist.  The two BBC references reference either a Christian magazine, or a BBC general interest science publication.  Which means that this isn't citing to original sources.  But even if it was, it seems the inclusion could well have been cheeky and sarcastic, rather than serious.   (Update: I'd missed zsig's comment below about the inclusion.   If this article stays, I think it's worth working to enure it's reasonable.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.81.161.25 (talk) 19:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPV? 

message: I'm pretty sure the claim that this car park is one of the 10 most secure places in the world isn't true. I own a copy of the issue of BBC Focus that's cited here - for a start, the article is hardly a "study" of the most secure places anywhere, more a general interest article throwing together some examples of highly secure facilities. Secondly, Bold Lane is mentioned specifically in a "car park" category - I think the intent of the article was to say that Bold Lane is probably the most secure car park around, not one of the most secure buildings. I haven't got the magazine to hand right now, and because this article has a front page mention I'm not confident enough to change it - could someone check up the facts and see whether the claim actually is justified? --ZsigE 12:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "10 most secure places" study 
Talk:Eugene K. Garfield

message: I have restored the article essentially as originally written and cited the references which were used at that time and should ahve been included under sources as per WP procedures at that time. I have reviewed the information and have modified some of the content to be more NPOV.
As noted by Jeandré, the article could be further improved by in-line refereneces, and I will deploy same for future edits, although I am not going to redo it or hundreds of other WP articles at this time without the newer feature of inline references WP added after article like this were written. The information in this article as currently presented is meaningful in the context of rail transport history. Vaoverland 19:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored and modified
Talk:WCMT (AM)

message: Westview High School is now the high school which serves Martin, but is not the same school as the old Martin High.  It is a different school in a different building at a different location.  75.216.33.28 (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Westview High School  

message: Don't see how "WCMT" can stand for "The Voice of Weakley County".  How about it stands for "Weakley County/Martin, Tennessee"?  Doesn't that make a LOT more sense?  75.216.33.28 (talk) 03:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call sign
Talk:Adjacency pairs

message: no other article about adjacency pairs currently exists on wikipedia. this is simply meant to be a short definition of the term in my own words. i have also made additions following your recommendations —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiptheyip (talk • contribs) 19:49, 29 April 2007
:I hereby second the assertion that the article satisfies wikipedia's notability policy. Oliverbeatson.talk.cont 23:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Newbern Depot

message: It appears that the name "Newbern-Dyersburg" is very rarely used for this station. The situation is similar to Selma–Smithfield (Amtrak station), which was retitled Selma Union Depot. This station serves Newbern and Dyersburg, but that doesn't seem to be its name. Today, the station seems to be chiefly known as simply "Newbern Depot" (or sometimes Newbern Depot & Railroad Museum, as there's a museum in the building). While "Newbern, TN" is what Amtrak uses, the common name of "Newbern Depot" is borne out by Great American Stations, the organizers of the local celebration called Newbern "Depot Days", the local media, and a number of websites. The National Register of Historic Places listed the building under "Newbern Illinois Central Depot", but the documents note that its "other name" is "Newbern Depot". It sounds like this is the common name, so I plan to move it when I get a chance.--Cúchullain t/c 19:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Newbern Depot looks right. Be bold! Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Columbia State Community College

message: If you're planning on entering advice on enrolling in classes, course guides, current events, or advertisement-like material, please read What Wikipedia is not before editing.  Specifically, this section and this section.  Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Wikipedia Is Not 
Talk:Everard Digby

message: I couldn't see Digby listed on the image of the plotters, so removed it. It may be appropriate for the related articles on the plot, but not it seems, this one. Alastairward (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Gunpowder Plotters 

message: The article says at the top that Digby was tried on 27 January 1605, which is before the 5th November of the same year. Surely he was tried on 27 January 1606? I will change this as the article later describes the trial in 1606.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.207.80.194 (talk) 10:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted, thanks. Parrot of Doom 18:17, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digby's trial 

message: I just wanted to inform that there is a picture on Wikimedia Commons of the inscription Digby left in the Tower of London: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DigbyInscription.jpg. It might be useful for this article. --94.140.45.210 (talk) 09:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inscription in Tower of London 

message: The poem mentioned in this article only contains the first strophe out of three, which might be worth mentioning. The other two strophes can be found on page 291 in Thomas Longueville's The Life of a Conspirator; Being a Biography of Sir Everard Digby by One of his Descendants:
*Come in, my Lord, whose presence most I crave, And shew Thy will unto my longing mind ; From punishments of sin Thy servant save, Though he hath been to Thy deserts unkind. Jesu forgive, and strengthen so my mind, That rooted virtues thou in me maist find.
*Stay still, my Lord, else will they fade away, As Marigold that mourns for absent Sun : Thou know'st thou plantest in a barren clay, That choaks in Winter all that up is come ; I do not fear thy Summers wished for heat, My tears shall water where thy shine doth threat. --94.140.45.210 (talk) 13:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem 

message: In the Surrender section, there is a reference to 50 pounds in "white money" which is wikilinked to argent. That article deals just with a term in heraldry (a colour), even though White money redirects to it also. What is white money: just real silver, or any silver-looking coin, or any non-gold coin? And is there a better article to link to in order to explain the term? Jmchutchinson (talk) 16:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  White money
Talk:Ewa Minge

message: Please, rewrite it in English.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.185.16 (talk) 14:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added sources per the unref'd BLP drive. Took out the weasel words and did a clean-up, reassess to stub-class. At least now it's a short but clear sourced statement. Pim Rijkee (talk) 21:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:Petro Trochanowski

message: It says "He was the first non-Pole to win the Petak Prize" but it also says he was born in "Silesia in the southwestern part of Poland". So...is he Polish or isn't he? Her Pegship  (tis herself) 00:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say nationality, not ethnicity, is the more relevant factor for this statement.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 12:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know for sure, but I strongly suspect that he would disagree with you.  Read his quotations.Pustelnik (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction?
Talk:F. Marian McNeill

message: See page 241 of The Biographical Dictionary of Scottish Women for more details of Miss McNeill's life which I have been too lazy to add so far. -- Derek Ross | Talk 00:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: A good source

message: Was editing on mobile yesterday and connection kept dropping - just to note that McNeill's brother Duncan H MacNeill used "MacNeill", not "McNeill" - see here for example.  Lirazelf (talk) 12:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of brother's second name
Talk:Clearwater River (Saskatchewan)

message: There is more information about this river at this url http://www.chrs.ca/Rivers/Clearwater/Clearwater-F_e.php. I hope to continue to use this to add to the article in the future.  oceanflynn 17:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That version was archived 5 May 2014 at https://web.archive.org/web/20140505061132/https://chrs.ca/Rivers/Clearwater/Clearwater-F_e.php . The website now appears at https://chrs.ca/en/rivers/clearwater-river . Kablammo (talk) 12:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian Heritage Rivers System

message: , is the convention no longer to use the locator map which has been in the article for some time?  I don't think we need two of them.  I've also moved one image to the right to avoid text squeeze.  Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , feel free to remove one of them.  I noticed it because it was the only article in :Category:Pages using geobox with x and y locator map parameters, which has been empty of articles for over a year. Frietjes (talk) 13:27, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locator map; images
Talk:Faces in the Crowd (Sports Illustrated)

message: I don't think the WPBiography template should be on the talk page for this subject. I thought I'd check rather than just removing it. gaidheal1 (talk♫contribs) 21:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. It is obviously a mistake.-Nilotpal42 05:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  misplaced template 

message: A disambiguation page is required for the articles Faces in the Crowd, Faces in the Crowd (play) and Faces in the Crowd (film) -Nilotpal42 05:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Smoky River

message: Nowhere to put it, so "storing" it here .Skookum1 (talk) 05:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  archival Commons image of confluence 
Talk:Sartell High School

message: There isn't enough to merge, in my opinion. it would be better to merge them into the article for the school district. Rightly or wrongly, the combined article will still be vulnerable at AfD. DGG 20:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Jaykeyp03 (talk) 04:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Provide reliable published secondary sources to verify your change please. John from Idegon (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DRAGON BOOSTER  ★ 17:10, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 August 2019
Talk:Fahim Ahmad

message: Much reporting on this topic is handicapped by a Canadian-wide publication ban, although I'll quote the judge who issued the 2006 ban that "The ban does not apply to information obtained outside the court". Any information I put on these pages is footnoted to its legitimate source, and nothing comes from any personal knowledge, discussions or attendance at legal hearings. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  03:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication Ban

message: The article appears to have a picture of Ahmad added to it, but it doesn't actually appear on his page.  Is there one of him added, was it deleted, or poor wiki program to add it? Adamdaley (talk) 00:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fahim Ahmad Picture
Talk:Farman Behboud

message: I believe the more common transcription of the first name is Farman.  Unless someone objects, I am going to rename the page. —Pouya D. Tafti 23:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transcription

message: Is the Persian Ballet Organization mentioned in the article the same as the Iranian National Ballet? —Pouya D. Tafti 23:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iranian National Ballet
File talk:Niko Pucic-Pozza.jpg

message: The titling of this picture is problematic.
As first, the picture is taken from the site www.crohis.com,
(complete address )as it can be seen on the picture.
But, that was not mentioned in the licensing, neither about sources of this picture.
Second, the picturename on en.wiki is distorted.
Original form on the sourcesite is called "pucicn.jpg".
Second, his signature can be seen at the bottom of the picture. It says "Nikola Pucić", not some "Pozza". In fact, he fought whole his life for Croatian cause, unification of Croatian lands and against the italianisation of southern Croatia. 
But, the uploader of this picture has ignored stating of the source (site www.crohis.com) and Pucić's personal declaring, putting italianised nameform in the imagename on en.wiki. That's perfidious way of distorting of historical data. Kubura 20:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)