lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Welsh Terrier

message: This breed is classed in Britain as a VNB - a breed which originated in the UK but now has registration numbers with the Kennel Club of less then 300 puppies per year.  
I'm a Canadian teenager on a gap year before Uni and I'm really interested in this.  Would anyone like a VNB paragraph/link on this page?  I can write it, but am ignorant about formatting etc.  Plus, I'm trying to put together a whole collection on all 29 breeds on this list, including history and so on, using Wikipedia as one of my many sources.  If you can help, or are interested at all, please contact me either on my talk page or at green_ied_dragon@hotmail.com   
--The Wizard of Magicland 19:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerable Native Breed 

message: I hope nobody minds that I added a little about the dog being a bit of a barker if left alone in the yard for periods of time. My neighbors have one and boy does he bark. Mokoniki (talk) 01:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barking 

message: I have removed all breeders links as per WP:ELNO. Please do not add them again. Miyagawa (talk) 12:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breeders links 

message: All dogs have sweat glands only on the paws, no dog (including Welsh terriers) perspires anywhere else on the body. This is false. Please remove this from the article. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.219.207.67 (talk) 20:29, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the comment. Hope you see this reply. I searched for a reliable source to refute your challenge. Unable to find any that do not point back to our article. The AKC site does not mention this in the breed standard. None of the other linked sources for this article do either. Therefore I am removing that entire sentence, since I now have no idea if or why their coat smells. Anyone wanting to replace this in the article; please locate a source. Book maybe?...  Thanks.  Fylbecatulous talk 21:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sweat glands"
Talk:Sealyham Terrier

message: This breed is classed in Britain as a VNB - a breed which originated in the UK but now has registration numbers with the Kennel Club of less then 300 puppies per year.  
I'm a Canadian teenager on a gap year before Uni and I'm really interested in this.  Would anyone like a VNB paragraph/link on this page?  I can write it, but am ignorant about formatting etc.  Plus, I'm trying to put together a whole collection on all 29 breeds on this list, including history and so on, using Wikipedia as one of my many sources.  If you can help, or are interested at all, please contact me either on my talk page or at green_ied_dragon@hotmail.com   
--The Wizard of Magicland 19:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerable Native Breed
Talk:3rd Belorussian Front

message: I just can't understand why do people stick with simply incorrect name "Belorussian". It is, at first, incorrect (in terms of English), and, at second, if you'll check Google, it is clearly outnumbered by "Belarusian" spelling (with or without "front"). Why to revert correct fixes? --Monkbel 11:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: why do you revert corrections of language mistakes? do you really think there are such words as "Belorussian" or "Byelorussia" or some other in English and these should be used? Did you try to check Google or any "official" encyclopedia about these? --Monkbel 16:43, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belarusian option 
Talk:Universal Soldier

message: I don't see why this should be deleted. I didn't create the article, nor have I ever seen the movies, but they exist, and could potentially be fleshed out considerably more. --gadfium 02:25, 29 May 2004 (UTC)

message: this is a nice movie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.194.62.230 (talk) 11:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nash tech
Talk:Dance notation

message: What sort of dance notation should one use in Wikipedia articles?Hyacinth 03:36, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Just like with music. But when describing music, we don't have to present wheets of the whole music pieces. The same is with dance. Probably particulrs choreographies are copyrighted. But, first, exerpts as quotations are legal; second, we will probably need simplified descriptions, to show the general outline, rather than detailed scores. Mikkalai 15:59, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: What dance notation in Wikipedia for examples of dance?

message: Don't feel obligated to follow this spelling tips if they distract you from adding new content!  Other Wikipedians (like me) will copyedit the spelling errors and other style trouble so if you prefer to focus on content do so by any means. (We even have a guideline saying more or less this: Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages.)
And this are the spelling tips:
* Although the name of the inventor of Labanotation is Laban, Labanotation is not written with a double n (one n is dropped), the adjective IS Laban as one would expect. (I found and corrected one time Labanotation incorrectly misspelled with double n in Wikipedia.) [Confirmation: the "Labanotation" Wikipedia article, and this website http://dancenotation.org (Dance Notation Bureau).]
* The family name of the inventors of Benesh Movement Notation is as one would expect indeed Benesh, no trouble there. But be careful not to forget the capitals of the latter two words. (I found and corrected several times those forgotten capitals in Wikipedia.) The adjective is also simply Benesh. Don't write by accident Benesh Dance Notation. (No errors found with incorrectly the word Dance used.) [Confirmation: Home page of The Benesh Institute http://www.benesh.org ]
N.B. I added links to this spelling notes on the Talk pages of the Labanotation and Benesh Movement Notation.
Paulus/laudaka 14:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling notes: Labanotation (SINGLE N), Benesh Movement Notation

message: The History section of this article oddly enough omits Labanotation and Benesh Movement Notation though they are both mentioned as the most widely used. So, they can be added in brief like the others. Also, given the visual aspect of dance notation, do you think it'd be good to have a gallery of examples?
The History section is also skewed towards western forms of dance notation though Hutchinson Guest's book that is referenced mentions many older (often textual) forms of notation that would be good to mention in order to give a broader and more global overview of dance notation. Alenmartel (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this article
Talk:John Wesley

message: The last sentence of the second to the last paragraph in the section "Personality and Activities" quotes John Wesley as saying "I did not forsake her, I did not dismiss her, I will not recall her" and cites this -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wesley#CITEREFWesley2000a -- as the source for this statement. This link does not actually contain the quote in any obvious way. If any searching must be done, I feel that it ought to be noted. Not sure if this is my error in not being able to find it or an error in the quotation itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.116.118.208 (talk) 03:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personality and Activites 

message: — Assignment last updated by Brian (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Christian Ethics
Talk:Indian Removal Act

message: Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimes against humanity category removal
Talk:Canada Dry

message: This "Drink Canada Dry" quote is more usually attributed to Brendan Behan. Djnjwd 18:40, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments

message: yumm, ginger ale. 
do you know when the inventor was born???
he was born at this time he was born in 1864  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.99.85.52 (talk) 22:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GINGER ALE 

message: I removed this picture from the page.  Since it's an amateur photograph, it's too self-promotional and unencyclopedic, equivalent to an American holding up a Budweiser and taking a picture of himself.  24.199.113.215 09:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I LOLed though.  I swear that guy's my cousin or maybe my uncle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.229.101 (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture removal 

message: I have read on a Peruvian soft drink website that there is a pineapple Canada Dry. website Rmpfu89 21:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pineapple 

message: No mention of "The champagne of ginger ales." slogan? I recall it was in the '70s sometime.  Trekphiler 09:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the slogan on the Farsi Wikipedia version of this pageGee totes (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The champagne of advertising 

message: The Jenga reference to being able to play much better with ginger ale doesn't seem all that scientifically sound, we really should have at least a reference before we include that.Starmurderer (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jenga Refrence 

message: * "In 1934, it was one of the first society to give comic books (a very recent creation of Max Gaines) as  a free gift to appeal people."
- If this sentence makes sense to you, please, feel free to stick it back in. (with an explanation) -  theWOLFchild 03:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed sentence 
Talk:GoldenEye

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Irina(Bond Girl) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Irina(Bond Girl) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Irina(Bond Girl)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The simplest test for easter egg links, per WP:EASTEREGG:  DonQuixote (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see eastereggs regularly in plot sections, even in good articles, but in this instance I'm blaming Sjones23, who seemingly reverts to this version every few months whether it's warranted or not. I'm certainly guilty of restoring old versions of plots, but actively proofread to include any improvements. As they are a longtime contributor to many quality articles, I suppose it's their way of quick maintenance. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I often remove easter egg links as per WP:EGG and of course, I sometimes restore the plot summaries (including this one) to the ones that are less-than-700 words as per the relevant guidelines at WP:FILMPLOT, which says that summaries are 400 to 700 words only. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was harsh, clearly you've contributed a lot to this and many articles, it just looked to me like a rote revert, when the summary already met guidelines. Currently everything reads well. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 07:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I'm always trying to help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: easter egg links 

message: I believe it is Bond, not Wade, who suggests his meeting with Valentin Zukovsky.  Even though I just watched the film, would like another editor to verify this and, if correct, make the slight correction. MartinLBuchanan (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valentin Zukovsky
Wikipedia talk:Main Page/French

message: I like this version a lot better. --mav 20:29, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: I'd rather Did you know? and On this day were higher up, and the browse section was moved down. Angela. 01:27, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it wouldn't be much different from the current Main Page. --mav 03:44, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It would still be very different as all the colors have gone. If the "browse by topic" is going to be given more prominence by moving it to the top, I think the pages in it need to be better thought out. I can't see how things like soul are regarded a topic, and a lot of the articles listed there are far from being our best ones. Sculpture, for example, is barely more than a stub with a few lists. Angela. 04:02, 30 May 2004 (UTC)

text: They aren't actually all that far away from where they are on the current Main Page. Personally I think it is essential that we have a topic list or even A-Z alphabetical links high up. Tom- 09:19, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:God/Archive 3

message: First of all, there is no "argument by loud denial" its something you made up. The idea that someone emphatically opposes your view is in no way inherently fallacious. Secondly, You are making a blatant Appeal to false authority with your amazingly biased sources, and simultaneously refusing to accept multiple valid sources on the subject of religious demographics. Furthermore you are perpetrating false generalizations in your attempt to include as many people as possible under the umbrella of atheism. This is a common technique of atheistic proselytizers, who commonly become wild in their exaggerations, when the number is documented at 2.44%. I don't know why I am bothering with this, there is a history of difficulties in doing so (
) but perhaps it is because as a lover of God I see potential in everyone for progress. Please strive for logical and moral growth. JackLynch 09:49, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: @JackLynch. Are you implying that CIA World FactBook is a biased source -- as this is the only one referenced here beside adherents.com? Kindly re-read my previous statements. Specifically, I pointed out that previous statement in the God article was broad enough as to include not only atheism. When accusing others of broken logic kindly state what exacly statement is wrong and why. Please don't use such statements Please strive for [...] and moral growth or I see potential in everyone for progress. as they are irrelevant to discussion and unnecessary heat up this discussion. Let's try not to move this discussion to an emotional ground. Additionally we may ask for a mediation on Village Pump or similar page. Przepla 14:22, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

text: So we may consider current version of God being a consensual one? BTW. It appears that I was responding to your responses to RK thinking it was a reponse to me. I'm sorry about that. Przepla 11:01, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: (i am new to this conversation) - It seems that there is much dispute over these numbers.  I have my own opinion on these numbers.  I'll say only that my opinion is not radical; that it is not statistically implausible.  Since there seems to be no clear and accepted number (if there were, people would generally accept it), I think it would be deceptive to say or imply in the article that there is.  To mantain a NPOV, the article, therefore should either state all numbers with equal prominence, and cite them in proportion to the degree that their statement occurs (that is, given equal weight to all sources), or put no numbers at all.  I am thus in agreement with the majority on this matter. -- Kevin Baas 18:42, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Logic]]
Talk:Alternative Transportation Movement

message: I could not find any other page even referring to what is referred to in North America, at least, as the Alternative Transportation (or Alternate Transportation, or Alternative Transport, etc.) Movement.  There is nothing in "Transport" or in "Bicycle" or in any of the ecological movement pages that really does this movement justice.
I realize a potential NPOV issue in calling it "Alternative", which implies that there is a 'normal', though from the North American POV, this is not an issue (unfortunately).
If someone knows a better name for it, go ahead and fix it.
RealGrouchy 20:32, 29 May 2004 (UTC)

message: This article lacks anything to indicate the history or presence of such a movement.  It at least needs an external link.  The car-free articles cover this topic nicely.  Jethro Elfman 19:30 Jan 29, 2006 UTC
:I would suggest that the most efficient all around (and indeed I do not think this entry should be suppressed, it is a very good front door for an important group of society shaping concepts) would be to have this kick the reader into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_transportation ericbritton 07:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for merge
Talk:Connection

message: What about connexion is it a different spelling of different meaning (for diff geom it is an alternative spelling). Maybe it should be glued together???
 Tosha 20:34, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, connexion is the older (and grammatically correct) spelling of connection.  There is no difference in meaning, it's just not that many people know about it as it's not often used. Morrad 22:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Connexion is the right spelling. Note to all foreign students of good English; just as the verb "complect" goes to the noun complexion, so goes connect to connexion. Did you ever read or write complection? Of course not. "Connection" is a corn pone sort of word.86.42.193.249 (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Connexion]]

message: It looks to me that there could be a better way of arranging this page, like splitting it into sections or something. But I find this quite challenging. Any idea for a better organization of this page? Oleg Alexandrov 18:30, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting this page into sections
Talk:Recycler (album)

message: Is there a better standard for Album titles. Perhaps 'Recycler - ZZ Top' would be less ambiguious. McClade
:This was actually created with (album), I just put it back. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Crown Prince Alexander II of Serbia and Yugoslavia

message: Moved from RC Patrol:
:Crown Prince Alexander of Yugoslavia - does anybody know the order of his wives?  An anon changed them, but I have no idea which is correct.  RickK 03:38, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They're in the right order now. Added additional info. - Nunh-huh 21:32, 29 May 2004 (UTC)

message: changed to serbia because there is no Yugoslavian country anymore. Croatia, SLovenia etc. do not recognize him as a crown prince.
:now that's just foolish. no country recognizes him as crown prince.--Jiang 21:16, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. It's back at Yugoslavia now. - Nunh-huh 21:21, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: It's not so much a question of who "recognizes" him, as it is a question of how titles work - or perhaps better put, it's athe fact that he once was recognized as Crown Prince of Yugoslavia but has never been recognized as anything of Serbia. His father was king of Yugoslavia, and he was crown prince of Yugoslavia. Then his father was deposed.  Deposed kings and their children in general retain their titles - even after the state they once ruled changes its form of government or even ceases to exist. What they don't get to do is change those titles if the nation's name changes. Aspirants to the titles of deposed rulers don't change the title: no one ever claimed they were Emperor of the U.S.S.R: they were claimants to the throne of Russia. The members of the Hanover dynasty that purport to carry the title of "Prince of Great Britain and Ireland" did not get to change their titles when that nation became the "Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". Crown Prince Alexander is trying a sort of "sleight of hand" in which he retains the title "Crown Prince Alexander" but changes the "of Yugoslavia" to "of Serbia": but that then becomes a "title of pretense" rather than one he actually holds. According to his website, his claim is that he is King of Serbia, but he uses a more "modest" title. But in the real world, he gets to change the title if he becomes king, because then he will be an actual fount of honour, or when he gets an new title from the government. the choice is pretty much use his name or use his (unchanged) title. - Nunh-huh 16:13, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yugoslavia to Serbia 

message: according to his webiste he is Prestolonaslednik Srbije i Jugoslavije
I moved article to that name.
Avala 13:13, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serbia and Yugoslavia 

message: The page Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) explicitely says "do not apply an ordinal in an article title to a pretender, i.e., someone who has not reigned". We can probably mention the position of prestolonaslednik right at the start of the page but AFAICT he never reigned over anything so the title of the article needs to be fixed. --Shallot 16:50, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Never reigned, page title wrong
Talk:International mobile subscriber identity

message: I don't think this is relevant. It used to say "stored as a 64-bit field on the SIM" (which is possible I suppose, although without a citation I'd say it's dubious, most GSM numbers are BCD, but is still irrelevant) but now just says "it is stored as a 64-bit field" which simply isn't true - I can store an IMSI scribbled on a piece of paper. There are also many systems that store IMSIs in (eg) BCD or ASCII. gwinkless (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stored as a 64-bit field? 

message: The U.S. is no longer only using 310 as a MCC.  At least 311 is used also.  I recognize that some of this info is a little dated (we all know how fast things change in this industry) but carriers no longer translate based on the first two digits of the MCC.  If so, 310 and 311 would translate the same.  However, I presume the reason that the U.S. branched off into MCC 311 may be because MNC's are most commonly looked at by the first 2 digits still.  This of course restricts MCC 310 down to 99 MNC's instead of 999. Kenny D 22:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Global Title Problems

message: :"In idle mode behavior, IMSI attach/detach location updating means the updating process was initiated by the mobile station to notify the BSC if the handset is powered on or off."
Please correct. -Pgan002 04:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomprehensible, ungrammatical sentence 

message: The IMSI detach article does not present sufficient information to stand on its own; it should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with your suggestion. I'll setup a stub incorporating IMSI attach and IMSI detach. → AA (talk) — 14:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[IMSI detach]] 