lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trenton Catholic Academy

message: After I changed class from Stub to start, removed below from WPSchools-info=. Included below for History purposes.
needs-infobox=no|info=A good beginning; look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines for ideas on expansion, and remember to continue adding references. The article also needs an infobox like  --Jh12 (talk) 05:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed infobox request
Talk:Kincardine and Western Aberdeenshire (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Because the constituency names are very, very similar. Or does it make more sense to turn both pages into disambiguation pages, referring to one constituency for "1918 to 1950" and one for "from 1997"? Laurel Bush 16:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Kincardine and Western Aberdeenshire (UK Parliament constituency)|Kincardine and Western Aberdeenshire]] into [[West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (UK Parliament constituency)|West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine]]?
Template talk:BRFA

message: I was going to add  both to "prettify" the documentation and to reduce the pre-expand template size, but it turns out the template is protected.  Could we add , for one to separate function and documentation, and for two to allow the documentation to be edited while leaving the template itself protected?  Thanks! — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 15:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --ST47Talk·Desk 15:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|editprotected}} 

message: The external link to the makebot log needs a urlencode:; it currently does not work for bot user names with spaces. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madman bum and angel (talk • contribs) 19:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --ST47Talk·Desk 19:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|editprotected}} 

message: Loving this yet?  With all the , this template was a prime candidate for a simple ; I have finally gotten off my lazy butt and made the change.  It halves the pre-expand size and makes the template infinitely easier to interpret and edit.  Desired contents are here, and I've already tested the template on WP:BRFA.  — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 05:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Daniel 07:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|editprotected}} 

message: This ought to be merged with :template:BRFAA, the one letter difference is tripping up BAG members who are almost following the instructions at User:SQL/How to close a BRFA Josh Parris 01:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[:template:BRFAA]] into this template
Talk:2C-O-4

message: there is given the false chemical structure (picture)! instead of 2C-O-4 (2,5-dimethoxy-4-isopropoxyphenethylamine) you wrote the structure of isoproscaline. please change, thanx.
:The image currently used in the article is correct. ChemNerd (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical structure
Talk:1987 Australian Touring Car Championship

message: The 1987 ATCC most certainly was NOT part of the WTCC. Additonally, neither the Bathurst 1000 nor Calder 500 were rounds of the 1987 ATCC. This information is completely false. --Falcadore 15:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WTCC

message: Started this up, because, I think essentially, I'd like to know why not do this. The 1987 Australian Manufacturers' Championship. Same events, same competitors but an additional title. Im thinking the details of the 1987 AMC could quite easily be merged into a paragraph of the 1987 ATCC article. Additionally because the AMC was seen as a subsidiary title, like for example the Constructors title in Formula One, which does not have thier own articles year to year.
Is there some aspect of the 1987 AMC which occurs outside of the 1987 ATCC? --Falcadore (talk) 11:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On the face of it, yes, the 1987 AMC was just a secondary title contested concurrently with the 1987 ATCC. But unlike the F1 Constructors title, which has always been awarded on the results of the same races as the Drivers championship (excepting the Indy 500, 1958 to 1960), the AMC was only staged with the ATCC on three occasions, 1987, 1988 and 1989. Mainly for that reason I felt that it was better to have a stand alone page for each AMC rather than for all but three. GTHO (talk) 10:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That the title appears to have failed and was wound up three years after starting I would suggest is more of a reason to merge, ie, making it less notable rather than more so. Redirects and prominent paragraphing can still maintain a separate sense of identity, but racing on the same races is distinctly compelling merger reason I feel. --Falcadore (talk) 15:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I may have inadvertantly mislead you with my initial response. What I should have said was “of the twenty four times that the AMC has been run, only on three occasions has it been staged with the ATCC”. GTHO (talk) 00:23, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:1981 Oakland Raiders season

message: I managed to download a video of the NBC pregame for the '81 Chargers/Dolphins Divisional Playoff game from YouTube where Bryant Gumbel was doing a year in review for NFL '81 where a gambling scandal was mentioned. Is this important to include here and if so, what happened? (Part 2 was unavailable).  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gambling Scandal? 
Talk:Priestly divisions

message: It appears there is simply a continuous cycling of the 24 divisions with no break for the three major festivals.  Would the cycle have continued as such when all the divisions were present to serve during the festivals or would they pause the cycle and then continue where they left off after the festival? 2600:1700:ADA0:17F0:B443:8563:EA68:92D (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The regular sacrifices belong only to the division of that week. the other divisions only share in the sacrifices of the holiday and the sacrifices of vows and volunteers. yoisef yitzchok-talk, 27 Shevat 5783. 01:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The schedule of the duties 

message: The table presented in the section "List" contains in some columns the dates in which each mishmar should start working. However, there is no source quoted sustaining this claim. There should be specified this source, in which the reasons for those dates are explained. Otherwise, these columns should be removed, since it gives the impression this is something quite established among scholars. I do not find any source like this, so I intend to remove them unless somebody can help with this. @castaliensis, 14 september 2023 Castaliensis (talk) 09:26, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gemara says that the temple was destroyed on the ninth day of Av, Sunday, during Yehoyarib's shift. The Julian date of that day is August 5, 70 AD, since then the days are simply counted. yoisef yitzchok-talk, 7 Tevet 5784. 06:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Should Start Working" columns
Talk:Temurah (Talmud)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Revert disambiguation page to primary. No rationale given for moving it. 184.144.163.181 (talk) 04:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Thorpe, North Yorkshire

message: Much of the material in this section is not actually historical and would be better removed elsewhere - a geography section perhaps.. The reef knoll material would work better in a geography section; though of interest, the parish is perhaps too small to sustain a geology section. Geopersona (talk) 20:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?
Talk:Jewish and biblical units of measurement

message: A lot more work needs to be done here, including adding of Hebrew to the article (I don't have a Hebrew keyboard, so its a pain), and enlarging the conversion data as in the source given, and formating it into a table or spreadsheet.--Mrg3105 02:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formating  

message: The construction of the Bronze Sea (1 Kings 7:23-26) provides a window into the measure of a cubit, since the volume is 2000 baths. 
The walls were sloped, since it was shaped like a lily, so a frustum of a cone suffices for an approximation, since an approximation for a bath of about 22 liters was used.
A cubit works out to be about 19.27"  This is an elbow to fingertip measurement. Mine is about 19.265" (19¼+1/64") --No938 (talk) 03:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical cubit 

message: Idk if this is needed, but as far as i know there is a very comprehensive list in the stiepler's sefer Birkath Peretz.--84.110.57.234 (talk) 19:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I'm going to merge this article into Biblical and Talmudic units of measurement, which seems more complete.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hippychickali (talk • contribs) 23:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:The State (Larry Niven)

message: : Wasn't this referred to as the World State in one of the books? Kuralyov 06:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The absence of Christmas Wreaths is certainly not a full-proof indication of the end of Christianity.  It's just a cultural trimming. The State does seem like the kind of draconian government that might outlaw religion(s), but you need better proof. JW Bjerk (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

text: For some reason, the "grendel" universe (Legacy of Heorot, Destiny's Road, and whatever the Heorot sequel was called) always struck me as being set in the State universe as well.  They never refer to it explicitly, but the comments which colonists make at various times all seem to point to an overcrowded planet with a tightly-controlling government. 107.9.45.143 (talk) 00:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Beowulf's Children and yes, I strongly received the same impression.  Mentally I assigned all three stories to the State.  184.57.164.183 (talk) 00:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  You've spotted similarities between fictional works, but I've spotted similarities in the threads instead. Therefore, I've taken the liberty of merging them. In fiction and as in real life, each hell is different, so while hell often has the same characteristics in each instance, please don't confuse them. To understand a hell, it's important to see both similarities and differences. The World State is a dystopia, but not very much of one. If they simply treated children and their elders better, a lot of people would be quick to see the World State as a utopia to die for if necessary. Enough said. 203.215.118.172 (talk) 08:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name/Story universe
Talk:Aufruf

message: Why do they throw nuts at the groom, and when did the custom start?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.77.191 (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Benedictine Academy

message: Victuallers 18:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marcus Luttrell

message: Isn't the source from Luttrell's website self published and should be removed according to WP:RS?50.37.92.170 (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is used to support the statement . That's acceptable per WP:ABOUTSELF. – 2.O.Boxing 08:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not know that. Thank you for the info and the quick reply.50.37.92.170 (talk) 08:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio source
Talk:St. James' School

message: I am not sure I agree with the move of the disambig page to this title. IMHO the oldest public school in India, founded in 1864, should be of much bigger importance than the others. // habj 07:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  St. James School in Exeter was founded in 1844, just because it's older doesn't make that worthy of more importance. So why should IMHO be there? Thenthornthing 09:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Academy of the Holy Angels

message: This is a start on your school article. Further advice is available at the schools project.
#Add some topics (like history?)
#Keep adding references
#Add pictures
#Ask for an assessment at the schools project.
:Good luck and welcome Victuallers 19:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: This article looks like it's written using largely school promotional material, and has very few citations for the things that it says. I think this needs one of those signs at the top that says it needs more citations and to be less like an opinion article but I'm not sure how to do that.
 150.176.9.254 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorializing and lack of citations?
Talk:Noor Sabri

message: Noor Sabri <3 I love you <3
My Name is shamis :D I am from Iraq  <3 Al Habibe<33
Ane ehibbek Ya Albadal Noor Sabri<3<3
I love Isood Alrafdien<3 Noor sabri abbas hassan 4 ever<3<3 
Noor sabri ehibbek Wallah<333  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.212.225.108 (talk) 09:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Golden Circle

message: Please explain the rationale for why Golden Circle (Food Company) doesn't deserve preference over the other articles listed here? This move did not get discussed prior to implementation.
Because it is not more important than all other uses of "Golden Circle" combined.  Second tier English law firms are important, The tourist route in iceland is important to them, and the jazz club matters to music afficianados. 
To top it all off, if any golden circle article deserves preference, it is the slavery related article, hands down.  I'm sure that corporation has nice guys working in it who make nice things.  But as far as companies go, it is tiny, and may vanish soon into the coca-cola corporation.  If corporations had their way, we would all pay a reasonable fee for every wiki page view.  Wikipedia is not an adverstising vehicle for them.
You should sign you posts with four tilde characters to auto-insert your user ID.  Ace Frahm 11:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pliny

message: Given the fact that almost every link to this page is, in fact, a link to Pliny the Elder page, shouldn't we move this disambiguation page to Pliny (disambiguation) and redirect Pliny to Pliny the Elder?
--PeterCantropus 16:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. It would serve the reader. --Wetman 00:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But, on the other hand, the other languages Wikipedias have a disambiguation page in the Pliny article. That doesn't matter? --PeterCantropus 16:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Another ill-fated attempt to make Wikipedia "foolproof". Please drop it, Arminden. To list all Plinys once is ok, the reader will have to be guided by the identifications after their names, and in case of doubt, will have to read to read both articles, the Elder's and the Younger's. There can't be any harm in acquiring additional knowledge. Kraxler (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jewish views on contraception

message: I noticed that Orthodox Jewish views on contraception were often close to those taught by the Magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church. I feel that these common views ought to made more clear, given that they could possibly lead to some useful interfaith collaboration. Another related issue is whether official Jewish views make any kind of distinction between contraception for Jews and contraception for Gentiles. ADM (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Interfaith

message: Currently, the last paragraph of the Orthodox section states: "Many Modern Orthodox authorities are inclined to permit contraception for a broad array of reasons, with some arguing that a couple may decide to delay procreation even without specific rabbinic permission." The writer even cited a source. However, said source is an article by an organization known as Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, which has become, um, highly controversial within the Orthodox community for its deviant halachic positions (this might surprise many non-Jews, but that's actually far more serious than any philosophical deviance that remains theoretical, short of outright heresy, which is pretty hard to do in Judaism as it requires denial of essential principles that define Judaism, like the existence and nature of God). Since organizations like the Rabbinical Council of America (RCA), which does not accept YCT semichah (formal rabbinical ordination) as a membership qualification, Union of Orthodox Hebrew Congregations of America (generally known as the Orthodox Union or OU), and Agudath Israel of America, which together represent normative American Orthodox Judaism, have criticized these positions heavily, sometimes in a fire-and-brimstone tone, YCT is definitely not a representative source, to say the least, so said paragraph should either be deleted or moved to its own section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:6020:7100:921:C48C:9110:5CE9 (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misrepresentation of Modern Orthodox views
Talk:Tasmanian scrubwren

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Sericornis humilis - Melaleuca.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 4, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-04-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Sericornis humilis - Melaleuca.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:River tyrannulet

message: I was ready to finalize the initial write-up, when the Eureka! hit. The Araguaia-Tocantins is usually considered the Amazon Range. But note, it releases just east of the Amazon outlet. So I had to "accurify" my initial write-up; I hope it is still concise, or close. I had to add the Xingu River, and the range goes across country to the ocean outlet of the Tocantins (see the RangeMap at "www.natureserve.org" (then 'InfoNatura') (It's the only Non-corridor stretch for the River Tyrannulet))...from the Deserts of ARizona, SWest USA, SonoranDesert... ..Mmcannis 04:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on Amazon Basin range
Talk:Heredia (canton)

message: This page is newly created, and I intend to expand it (along with quite a few other "stubbed" pages I've created in the past few days). Please hold off on deletion, or tell me how much time I have. RaderBarbarian 16:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:China Club

message: Is there a reason for the article being in the future tense, when the club apparently opened in 1991?
45ossington 16:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a pretty terribly written article with no citations, though on the sources part, sources are VERY scarce, so I think we have to live with that. I had the privilege of dining here on my trip and will upload some photos of the dining hall / buffet, since you are not going to find those on the net floating around. I don't even know if I was allowed to snap them because it's a members-only thing, but since I wasn't stopped, it's free for all to see just what this place is like. Jon914 23:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: did a little rewrite. i am really amazed how people dont understand that a well written encyclopedia article on their business is actually better than a puff piece. if this place is as described, i think it speaks for itself. i would go. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

text: removed spammy link, found corporate website to link to. i think is ok now. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a Rewrite 
Talk:Hong Kong Club

message: I suggest substitution of "private" for "exclusive" in the first line. See comment at Category talk: Traditional gentlemen's clubs.
45ossington 16:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Exarchate of the Philippines

message: This edit chenged a number 3 to a number 7, without disturbing the previously cited source which had been said to support the number 3. I looked briefly at the source, and I don't see how it supports either number. WTF?????? -- Boracay Bill (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3? 7? 12? 27? supporting source? 

message: I've just had to excise a portion of the article because it used as it's only source another Wiki. Remember, wikis are almost always deemed unreliable sources because of their open editing standards. Pairadox (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikis as sources

message: I clicked ref. No 5 (Miltiadis Adamopoulos) and I got the "Page not found" message. What happened? The "Orthodox Wiki" has a similar reference that doesn't work either. The Orth. Wiki article says something about Greeks and "Macedonians" in the Philippines since the  17th century. Is this correct or biased by contemporary geopolitics? Who was "Macedonian" at that time?
Any way, does anybody know where can I find the Milton Adamson book?Kentavros (talk) 10:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The website which hosted that page moved or deleted it. A copy was available in internet archives, though. I've fixed the link to upoint to the archived copy. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Two of the links were not working and so I removed them when I created the Parishes and Chapels section.  I am not sure it's necessary to have all these various references. Perhaps just having them listed as external links would be good enough.  Besides, I find them all very distracting when reading the article.  I hope that I was able to put the references next to what they are supposed to support. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-functional link
Talk:Kittel

message: "A kittel (Yiddish: קיטל;, robe) is a white robe worn on special occasions by religious Jews."
should be corrected to:
A kittel (Yiddish: קיטל; robe) is a white robe worn on special occasions by religious Ashkenazic Jews.
As this Garment is not worn by Sephardic Jews, but rater is worn solely by Ashkenazic Jews.
This has already been fixed on the Hebrew wikipage: קיטל
--Elias19 21:14, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kittel
Talk:The Brook

message: I suggest deletion of "exclusive" in the first line. See comment at Category talk: Traditional gentlemen's clubs.
45ossington 16:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entry reads "The Brook is generally regarded as the most exclusive gentlemen's club in the United States", but it cites no support for this claim. And upon what objective criteria could they make it? The Brook is neither the oldest gentlemen's club in the US (indeed, it's one of the younger ones), nor is its clubhouse in the most exclusive location, nor is its proposal process the most rigorous, nor are its members the most illustrious, nor does it enjoy reciprocal privileges with the most exclusive clubs in other cities. To cite just one example of a club more deserving of that title: the Pacific-Union Club in San Francisco is decades older, has its clubhouse in a more exclusive location, has more prominent members, has reciprocity with the best clubs worldwide, and requires no fewer than 14 existing member to propose a new candidate. While I'm not proposing the P-U Club for the title of "the most exclusive gentlemen's club in the United States", I describe it to suggest that this claim for The Brook is subjective, untenable and should be removed from the entry. Bricology (talk) 00:29, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I gave it seven weeks, but no one came forward with any source(s) or evidence to support the claim, so I removed it. Bricology (talk) 23:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the most exclusive gentlemen's club in the US"?