lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clarksville, Iowa

message: == Do I have permission to delete the judo person? ==  
1. His name doesn't come up on Google.  
2. He must have been kicked off the team.  
3. Or maybe it's just the name of the person who added him, since that person only had one contribution.  
4. I live in Clarksville, a smaller town, but I haven't heard of him...
It obviously should be deleted, correct?  --Bandita Chinchilla (talk) 01:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted since it was unsourced.  Bandita Chinchilla (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

message: A bit obsolete because businesses tend to change a lot in Clarksville.  Plus the  snow looks icky
:Very well; can you supply a better one?  If not, please leave it there.  Nyttend (talk) 20:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Clive, Iowa

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Look at these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section (if there is one).
Please review the following before editing:
# Document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Add only information that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .—RifeIdeas Talk  19:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:College Springs, Iowa

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Look at these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section (if there is one).
Please review the following before editing:
# Document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Add only information that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .—RifeIdeas Talk  15:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Conrad, Iowa

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Look at these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Add only information that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .—RifeIdeas Talk  22:46, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Corydon, Iowa

message: The CB&Q, GN, Northern Pacific and Spokane, Portland and Seattle merger was effective March 2, 1970.  The CB&Q discontinued service to Corydon in 1966.  Therefore it is incorrect to refer to the that railroad as the Burlington Northern, since the BN never provided rail service to Corydon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justus R (talk • contribs) 20:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CB&Q 
Talk:Creston, Iowa

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable people" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  00:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Still Life (disambiguation)

message: Still Life, a song by UK band Suede
: So? Trafford09 (talk) 10:41, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song by Suede 

message: This section was previously entitled "Removed entries that are non-notable". I've renamed it, and collapsed my 'talk' into a hidden table, as my thoughts, it transpired, were based on my misunderstanding of what's allowed in wp:DAB pages. (One can click on 'Show' to display the prior text.)
Trafford09 (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Article-level notability is not the criterion for inclusion on a dab page. If a topic is discussed/mentioned within another article, it may be listed on a disambiguation page, per MOS:DABMENTION. The Manual of Style for disambiguation pages shows several examples of such "mentioned" entries, particularly in the section Where piping may be appropriate. If you disagree with this guideline, the place to discuss it is the MOS:DAB Talk page. I have reverted your removal of these valid dab page entries.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please ignore this section 

message: Just because these an actor or television series is notable, it does not follow that any film or episode on them is notable in its own right. If you think that a particular work is notable, create an article for that work, and only then add a link to it from the Still Life article. This is in line with the Wikipedia advice wp:Write the article first.
* Still Life, a 1999 UK-Zimbabwean short film starring Agnes Bernelle
* "Still Life", a TV List of The Dead Zone episodes#ep48 episode
* Still Life (TV series), a non-broadcast 2003 series starring Jensen Ackles
User:Trafford09 (talk) 11:59 am, 22 December 2010 (UTC+0)
|
|}
:*Article-level notability is not the criterion for inclusion on a dab page. If a topic is discussed/mentioned within another article, it may be listed on a disambiguation page, per MOS:DABMENTION. The Manual of Style for disambiguation pages shows several examples of such "mentioned" entries, particularly in the section Where piping may be appropriate. If you disagree with this guideline, the place to discuss it is the MOS:DAB Talk page. I have reverted your removal of these valid dab page entries.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed other entries that are non-notable
Talk:Cirrus VK-30

message: NTSB lists 3 VK-30 accidents since 1970.  Two were fatal. In the first one the flap bracket separated and the 75 year old pilot was killed.  The failure was attributed to poor welding on the flap push rods.
In the second, the airplane crashed into a mountain during approach.  It had a fuel system that was modified outside of design specs.  Witnesses reported no engine noise.  Pilot and passnger were killed.
In the third, the engine quit in flight, and the pilot did a gear up emergency landing.  Both pilot and passenger walked away, reporting no injuries.  The pilot stated that the flowmeter had failed a couple of days previously, and he had been "estimating" remaining fuel - apparently not well.
In the one cited in the article, if they were testing a turbine powered aircraft, then it wasn't, by definition, a VK-30, which is powered by a reciprocal engin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpinkham1 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: These are amateur-builts so all will deviate from the plans to some degree or another. However in this case the NTSB identifies it as a VK-30. - Ahunt (talk) 23:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NTSB Reports
Talk:Van's Aircraft RV-9

message: If you fly an RV-9, please feel free to put this userbox on your user page!
Code	Result
    	
-Ahunt (talk) 15:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: Where do the flight stats come from?  I see in our info that the RV-9 has a max climb rate of 1,000 ft/min, but I know I have been in one at 2,500 ft/min, so I am wondering about the source for our current information.  Googlemeister (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You bring up a good point - they are unreferenced. I will update the format and reference it to the compnay specs and performance figures. - Ahunt (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  flight stats
Talk:Learjet 31

message: This page needs an info box added.  I will try to get to this later.  Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well I added the template, edit as needed. I would like to say that some of the grammar is off. The readability of the history section is questionable. It needs a bit of cleanup.--MJHankel 22:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: article work
Talk:Vile Parle

message: Fairly good article, needs a little sprucing. Manasl 06:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi guys,
I am skeptical of including list of schools and colleges, malls, hospitals, places of worships... for that matter any kind of lists. Wiki is encyclopedia so things should be presented in details if they are worth knowing or is associated with any kind of important events in past or present. Information should not be bulleted.
Wikipedia is not a directory, and hey, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information either.
If you all agree I would like to delete all lists from this page. spacejuncky 15:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right -- listing all schools in a suburb is encyclopedic. I've included the names of institutions with their articles in See also section. This will avoid the possibility of these articles becoming orphaned. utcursch | talk 10:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 
Talk:Amana Corporation

message: The company doesn't seem to be notable enough to merit its own page. Anyone else agree? A google News search for "amana corporation" shows 27 results. IMO, adding an Amana corporation subheading to Whirlpool would be a good idea. CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect with Whirlpool
Talk:List of Michigan State Spartans championships

message: This http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_State_Spartans article says that there are currently only 25, which rings truer to me (as an alum) as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.105.154 (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  29 varsity sports? 

message: Should be ACTUAL championship designations, not votes from individual pollsters. To wit - the 1979 champions were Alabama and USC. Michigan State finished 12 in the AP and unranked in the Coaches poll, the two major polls. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_NCAA_Division_I-A_football_rankings This list is a work of fiction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.13.113 (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football national championships 

message: Once upon a time MSU had a Men's Lacrosse team and I think it won a few league titles (not the Big Ten, but some Lacrosse-specific league). I don't know the details, I was hoping to find them here but I did not. MrArticleOne (talk) 03:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacrosse
Talk:Brighella

message: I think whoever wrote this article didn't do much research. Especially where it says Brighella's plans were "foiled by their own ineptitude." Quite the contrary -- Brighella's plans traditionally are very workable and clever, and it's usually luck  alone that will cause them to be foiled. I think in a day or two I will expand this article a little, and I expect that if no one has objections or evidence for me, I'll take out that line while I'm at it.
--Sobekneferu 07:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was most likely vandalism.  It happens. It's just up to us to act as custodians of the articles.  Thanks for being the one to catch this time.IanThal 23:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be enough material on the character of Scapino to justify either a separate section or even a separate article. What do people think?IanThal 19:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scapino 

message: Illiterate article. Very macaronic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.154.93 (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illiterate
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-09-05/Interwiki report

message: it.wikispecies.org? Wikispecies doesn't have language editions... —Nightstallion (?) 07:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a mistake...You can fix it...Sugarpinet 16:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It actully looks like it does have language editions...Sugarpinet 16:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, Wikispecies is like the Commons or Meta -- multi-lingual, but only a single edition. —Nightstallion (?) 12:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Politicians from Louisville, Kentucky

message: Marcus Qwertyus is reverting correction of this category without any discussion at the moment, but it should be at :Category:Louisville politicans since (a) it's shorter; (b) Louisville, Kentucky, is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for Louisville. I could see an argument for "Louisvillian" but omitting the second comma is simply poor grammar and we should opt for ease of use and common usage (i.e. omitting the state) where we can.
Q has WP:OWNERSHIP issues, but I don't have time at the moment to correct his reverts. Kindly help fix this when you can. — LlywelynII 00:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He's opted for a move to :Category:Politicians from Louisville, Kentucky, which is fine as well (over long but more specific and of a piece with People from X, Y pages). — LlywelynII 00:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Louisville politicians
Talk:Jochen Liedtke

message: I've added some detail to this article, but all I had to go on was the "In Memorium" page and Prof. Dr. Liedtke's publications. If I got anything wrong, please fix it. Thanks, CWC(talk) 07:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a fair bit more detail (incl references) and a picture obtained from his widow. I've consequently removed the stub tag. Some of the information was sourced from the German version of the obituary at KIT, a bit is personal communication.heiser (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expanded

message: *Prof. Dr. Liedtke's DBLP page is http://www.sigmod.org/dblp/db/indices/a-tree/l/Liedtke:Jochen.html.
*His ACM publications can be found here, but the PDFs at http://i30www.ira.uka.de/aboutus/people/personal/liedtke/ are often smaller and easier to read.
(Neither of these links have his PhD thesis or the technical reports he contributed.) Cheers, CWC(talk) 07:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful links

message: At the time of writing this, there existed a distinct (stub quality, I admit) L3 microkernel page. The Jochen Liedtke page L3 link went to a section about predecessors in the L4 page, L4 microkernel family#L3. I don't know if this is intentional. Feel free to (merge the L3 and L4 pages, change the "Known For" link in the infobox from L3 microkernel and) revert this (08:51, 31 March 2012) change. This is little more of a venture than what I'm up to in my drive-by saturday amusement edits... Rootmoose (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I support merging L3 into L4, L3 is only noteworthy as L4's predecessor. heiser (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, this merge has been done (in July 2017). CWC 12:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  L3 page references were not synchronized 
Talk:Trini Kwan

message: is it me or is it just coincidence that the actress died by a vehicle related accident, and the only mentioned monster that defeated her is "car"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.237.205.38 (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: sick joke?

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tokusatsu#Power Rangers characters titles czar ⨹ 18:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: This page has Trini's status listed as "retired". However, I feel that this is a topic up for debate and there is no way to confirm that Trini (in universe) is retired from being a Power Ranger. He status should be updated to "unknown". Yes it is true that Trini was written out of the show in the 2nd season and her powers were transferred to Aishia. However, in "The Legendary Battle", the last episode of Power Rangers Super Megaforce, we see the return of the Yellow Mighty Morphin Power Ranger. It is likely, that this is Trini. It is possible that it could be Aisha or Miss Alicia too, but there is no hard evidence to suggest that either of these three women is the Yellow Ranger who appears in this episode. That being said, her status should be "unknown" until we are able to confirm what Trini is actually up to in universe and whether or not she participated in the Legendary Battle.
To reply to the above, there is a new trailer out for Power Rangers confirming her death. Shouldn't her status be changed from retired to deceased? 109.150.97.183 (talk) 10:05, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Retired or Unknown

message: She's already grounded by repairing the walls of the bedroom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.222.88.10 (talk) 05:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punishment 

message: These sources are all pretty weak. They're mostly about Power Rangers itself. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 02:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Novelty (patent)

message: I believe that the terms as used in the article are incorrect.
Relative novelty/absolute novelty relate to USE of an invention outside of the country of filing and the terms are somewhat similar to the local novelty requirements (correctly) set out elsewhere in the article.
The grace period for self-disclosure is nothing to do with the relative/absolute novelty requirements. For example, Australia and the US are absolute novelty countries with grace periods for self-disclosure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.247.77.93 (talk) 11:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above comment is correct.  Absolute novelty relates to the requirement that the invention must not have been disclosed anwhere in the world before, by any means.  Relative novelty relates to the requirement that the invention must not have been used or publish in a specific way in relation to the region that the patent is being filed in. For instance it may have been used overseas, but not published overseas to retain novelty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.96.117.138 (talk • contribs) 
There appears to be some confusion in this article concerning "grace period".  Commonly, this is taken to refer to the period of twelve months allowed under US patent law which allows for a patent application to be filed after disclosure of the invention by the applicant.  In other jurisdictions such as UK and EPC, the grace period is usually used to refer to the period of six months permitter under the Paris Convention which permits a patent application to be filed after disclosure made in breach of confidence.  Without this provision such a disclosure would destroy the novelty of the subsequently filed patent appliction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.138.39.59 (talk • contribs) 
Why has this not been corrected? I cannot do so myself as it would involve majorly restructuring the article to separate out the two completely separate issue (first-to-invent and grace periods on the one hand and absolute, relative and local novelty as a completely different matter. I just don;t have the time to do it. Will someone please step up up to the plate?
This canker of nonsense has been festering here for FIVE YEARS...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.89.57 (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Thanks for pointing out to this unreferenced material in the article. This was long overdue indeed. I have removed the contentious information and rearranged the article's lead section, which was much too long. --Edcolins (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative/Absolute Novelty
Talk:Stylistic device

message: It looks to me like "Stylistic device" and "Figure of speech" are two independently written articles about (nearly) the same concept. They have a great deal of overlap. Apus 08:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've commented out the overlaps.  I've no idea whether this is an argument for or against a merge, but I don't think the article makes it clear where the distinction lies. EdC 18:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure of speech 

message: another overlap Saint|swithin 07:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Rhetorical device]]

message: Not to disparage the writing of my fellow wikipedians but I think it would be nice if we could find actual literary examples for all the particular literary tropes described in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.142.214 (talk) 01:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary examples 

message: I can’t find any instance of “depitation” outside Wikipedia that is not either a misspelling or part of a Non-English text. That includes various dictionaries (OED, Heritage, Century, Webster's 1913, WordNet, Random House, ...). I’ll preserve this word on Wordie for later generations, but this article might benefit from a more common term for that stylistic device; I’m sure thee is one out there. – Telofy (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What about [Grandiloquence]? – Telofy (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depitation 

message: State and explain 154.154.22.239 (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The staylistic devices
Template talk:Hannah Montana

message: What is the precedent for putting the cast list on television show templates?  I haven't seen them on the ones for shows I've come across, and it doesn't seem necessary to me. -Shannernanner 08:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast

message: If anyone's interested in helping improve HM articles, please sign your name below.
 
-Sevensouls 22:13, 10 September 2006 UTC
:This isn't the right place to suggest a Wikiproject. If you support this Wikiproject, I suggest you propose it in the proper places. bibliomaniac15 05:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Hannah Montana

message: Is there any point in having just on episode listed?  Surely you none (and a link to the list article) or you have them all. —Moondyne 01:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That episode was particularly notable for being a crossover episode, so it was made separate. bibliomaniac15 01:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list 

message: I don't see any reason to change the parameters for the nav box. The defaults are well designed, fit with the articles and make good sense as they are. The proposed changes make the nav box harder to read. Reduce the size to not match other nav boxes in the same articles and force collapsed when not needed - default auto collapse does the right thing when 2 or more nav boxes are in article. --NrDg 02:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the change in parameters and appearance?