lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Don't Be Cruel (album)

message: New jack swing is part of the rnb sphere. It actually changed rnb. Moreover, the album is not just new jack. There are ballads and songs that would be considered r&b. I dont understand what the big deal is?
In any case, it's not a big deal
Helpingimprovewiki (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Genre" drama
Talk:Titular church

message: No, this is not a disambiguation page, though it is capable of being pared down to become an expanded dictionary definition.  A first passing editor casually applied the disambiguation tag. Then a second passing editor would discard all information that does not fit the prescribed disambiguation format. Not useful to the Wikipedia reader. Since it appears that the disambiguation category cannot be applied with thoughtfulness and flexibilioty, it must be applied very cautiously, and only to the strictly-regulated subtype of "disambiguation pages". Think before you apply any tag. This is not a disambiguation page. --Wetman 04:05, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Statement is made: "Originally,[when?] these were basilicas in Rome[dubious – discuss] under the direction of a permanently appointed presbyter and corresponding to what would now be called parish churches."  Originally, San Clemente was an apartment house in which Clement's Christian followers met;  originally SS. Giovanni and Paolo was the family house.  Santa Croce in Gerusalemme was an audience hall in the palace of Constantine's daughter.  Basilicas did not become available to the Christians (they were not allowed to own land corporately until Constantine's time) until the fourth century.  Obviously more thought and a lot more care needs to be put into this section.  Vicedomino (talk) 11:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of tituli

message: I think that this page is sufficiently brief that it would benefit by incorporating the List of titular churches in Rome article into this one, under a separate section. There's probably also an advantage of having information consolidated on one page for the reader. A separate list article serves little purpose, in my opinion. RAVENPVFF | talk ~ 11:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal with [[List of titular churches in Rome]] 

message: Efforts to repair the first couple of sentences in the History section, based on my observations, have not been successful. Firstly, the opening sentence has become too clotted with one follow-on observation after another. It needs to be subdivided into manageable statements. Secondly, Mythology (or 'tradition' if you wish) needs to be distinguished from established fact. And I repeat that the Church could not have public, identifiable, places of worship until after Constantine legalized Christianity. Before that, they were an illegal assembly and had no corporate rights in terms of Roman property law.  --Vicedomino (talk) 05:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of tituli (again)
Talk:John Ferguson Jr.

message: I've just noticed JFJ's playing career is extraordinary. Someone want to fix that? SelfEx1led (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Playing career

message: Well congratulations. Protecting this article gave the attention these idiots wanted. --Tykell 04:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two sources cite JFJ's year of birth as 1969 ... yet on his MapleLeafs.com profile, it says he is 39 years old, thereby making his year of birth 1967?  Any ideas as to which of the two years is correct? Amchow78 15:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: John Ferguson Jr. Is no longer the General Manager of The Toronto Maple Leafs, He was relieved of his duties On Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008. His Successor was Cliff Fletcher, who was GM from 1991-1997  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.129.34 (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Job
Talk:The Suicide Machines (album)

message: This article needs either NPOV text or sources for the assertions about what fans thought of the album. Otherwise, it's a review instead of an NPOV source of information. --Habap 18:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd honestly just remove that section entirely (in fact, I will and if someone absolutely feels it needs to be put back then so be it) due to the fact that you're less likely to find an article citing a fan consensus on the sound of an album as opposed to how likely you'll be to find a solitary review that points out the change in overall sound heard in the album compared to those prior. 71.156.83.157 09:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote the whole thing for NPOV. Hopefully it's better worded now. IllaZilla 04:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Template talk:PD-because

message: Just a note: :Image:Achtung.png now has an svg replacement. I'd make the change myself, but this template is protected. McNeight 04:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Action was completed. --Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 02:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achtung.png → Achtung.svg 

message: can an admin add the interwiki to it.wiki? see it:Template:PD-Perché thanks --dario vet  (talk) 13:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: please :-) --dario vet  (talk) 08:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done. CMummert · talk 23:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: request

message: Hi, please replace Category:Public domain images with Category:PD other reasons (as to sync with Commons - see commons:Category:PD other reasons) and add  on the blank line (between the interwiki link and the "Category:Image copyright tags").
Thanks, --Iamunknown 06:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 04:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request: Separate category, add Template:Pp-template 

message: Please update the text "is valid" to "is valid" to bypass the redirect that it currently links to. giggy (:O) 07:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . Cheers, Alex Muller 10:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link fix 

message: ...with the way I've put the template on this page? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 04:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The single square brackets put around the link screwed it up.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the problem... 

message: Plz, add
cs:Šablona:PD-because
it:Template:PD-Perché
pl:Szablon:PD-because
ru:Шаблон:PD-because
uk:Шаблон:PD-because
Thx. Alex Spade (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Removed, and also moved interwikis to /doc page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iwikis 

message: This template was inserted by the upload wizard to en-Wikipedia, not Commons. But it links to the policy for Commons, which is different from that for Wikipedia. Why? ―Mandruss ☎ 08:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does it link to Commons policy?
Talk:Miramar Air Show

message: The title of the page needs to be adjusted to Miramar Air Show (two words), which is proper style and will match the general Air Show page title.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeoPraetorian (talk • contribs) 08:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of page 

message: The dates for 2022 are September 23rd through the 25th not October 2600:1700:D510:E1A0:1C42:B901:B277:BAA2 (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date correctio
Talk:Wilfried Van Moer

message: I'm trying to get some information on the career of Wilfred van Moer, the Belgian Footballer.  Would like to know;
Where he was born.
How many appearances made/goals scored with each of his respective clubs; Beveren, Antwerp, Standard Liege, Beringen and Beveren again.
I know about his caps and goals and that he was captain of Belgium in the 1980 European Championship.
I would like to discover any unusual facts about this player and perhaps what he is doing now.
I also understand he had a spell as coach of the Belgium national team.  When was that and which other clubs did he coach?
:According to this, he was national coach from October to December 96. Bobo. 05:41, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-06/Userbox warring

message: Also note that User:Carbonite has declared that he is leaving WP over this matter -Ravedave 04:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I belive User:Radiant! an admin with almost 20,000 edits is also leaving over this -Ravedave 02:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, it was; the quote was direct from the block log. Apologies, I should have marked it with "sic". However, it's now been replaced with another quote, a slight modification that no longer uses the word. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:03, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, right - I saw the almost identical wording on WP:AN and assumed it came from there.  Didn't think to check the block log.  Apologies, by the way, for messing around with your copy:  I just thought it was worth trying to get it completely right, for posterity. -- ALoan (Talk) 01:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chinese musicology

message: Please do not reduce the explanations in this article without discussing changes here. If you want improvements in the article, please specify them here. P0M 04:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanations

message: Please, check this diff
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_musicology&diff=93315453&oldid=90182697
It's clear that "do re mi familiar to US and UK" is too specific and not accurate at all; Then my solution is  not ideal, but I learned I could directly link Western notation system to Musical Notation because they're actually the same thing at the time of writing. 
Maybe we should do some merging.
Sdistefano 06:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you will do some more reading on sol-fa you will find that in some countries, actually most countries, do is assigned to a specific and unvarying frequency, not to the first note in the sung scale. You have changed the article so that it is no longer correct. P0M 05:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Western notation system

message: Someone has added to the text: 
The first musical scales were derived from the harmonic series. On the Guqin all of the dotted positions are equal string length divisions related to the open string like 1/2, 1/3, 2/3, 1/4, 3/4, etc. and are quite easy to recognize on this instrument. The Guqin has a scale of 13 positions all representing a natural harmonic position related to the open string. All musical tunings all over the world are based on this primary system. Afterwards different cultures moved to alternate variations of this harmonic system.
The "guqin" is not the standard for the Chinese music of antiquity. The 史記 had the mathematical description, in embryo, around 10 A.D. The earliest instruments that I know about were flutes made by drilling holes in bird bones, but getting exact frequencies must have been a matter of art and good luck. The earliest theory was written in terms of flute wind column lengths, i.e., what lengths of single bamboo tubes to use as standards. Dividing strings or columns of air by 4, 5, or 7 was not part of the written musicological tradition.
So where is your proof? P0M (talk) 03:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ungrounded assertions 

message: — Assignment last updated by Shuang Wen (talk) 06:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: China Encounters the World
Talk:Covenant of Unitarian Universalist Pagans

message: There seems to be only one third party source, and it's to a single page in a book. If there are no additional ones to be found, I don't think this would meet WP:GNG.  DGG ( talk ) 15:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For those of us who may be new editors, can you give some suggestions for what some positive next steps may be for this? In other words, I am not an expert in this area, but am willing to help it out a bit. Thanks! FULBERT (talk) 19:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , What is needed is magazine or newspaper articles or  chapters in books discussing it in a comprehensive manner, written by people not connected with the group, or at least not published bythe group.  For an organization of this sort, it can be somewhat difficult to find them. Major nework television programs about the group, or similar material, is also useful. I fo not know what specialist publications may be in the subject area.   DGG ( talk ) 18:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

text:  Thanks; helpful! FULBERT (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: sources
Talk:Highett, Victoria

message: The City of Kingston website says Highett is in Kingston, and not Brayside. Does anyone have anything saying otherwise?Mikhael04 09:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: highett is in bayside and kingston bayside is south west of the railway line.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.235.90.4 (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Correct. Also, Highett is in the same boat as Cheltenham. Either side of the railway is a different council. In both cases, it's Kingston/Bayside. -- MST☆R    (Merry Christmas!) 09:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Kingston or Bayside?

message: The information on the Football Club is not useful for someone who is not familiar with the area, I.e. where is Turner Road, what is the Waves, what is a U/9.
It needs to be fleshed out or removed, happy to flesh it out.   The Waves could do with its own page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckydog429 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are no references tying the football club down in this article, you may remove it by all means. With Waves having a seperate article, tread carefully, as I think it's notable having been there mysef, However, it will need reliable sources to corroborate notability ~ otherwise it will be merged into this article. Thanks -- MST☆R    (Merry Christmas!) 01:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Have made a change to try and improve the layout better explain the detail.   Thoughts very welcome!  If we are going to detail Sporting Clubs in Highett, perhaps the Archery and Fly Fishing should also get a mention.  As for the Waves Leisure Center, it does not get mentioned here:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Kingston   Perhaps that is a better place to detail the Waves. Luckydog429 (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Full of Ideas you are! :) yes, the City of Kingston article would be probably the best place to go, considering it actually needs more services listed on its article. Also, I've noticed that you may be having difficulties linking to an article, all you need to do if follow this: Article's name goes here . If you need anything, please ask. -- MST☆R    (Merry Christmas!) 07:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Football Club
Talk:Sandringham, Victoria

message: Moving this comment here, from the article: 
Note: This photo was not taken in Sandringham: it was taken at Brighton Beach, which is about 4 km north of Sandringham.
--Chriswaterguy talk 13:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo shows Brighton 

message: Can the matter of narrowing beach road be added to the page? -Celco85-Celco85 (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is now three years old - unless we know what the original council plans were and what is happening right now with reliable sources, it would not be worth including as it may never happen.Fleet Lists (talk) 04:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beach Road narrowing?
Talk:First Anglo–Powhatan War

message: hey my name is Kaitlyn. this week in social studies I have to give a news report on powhatan. your website has helprd me so mucb
thank you
With respect, I have a hard time with the genocide comment in the article.  I am not sure I see a huge difference between some european invaders and some native americans when it comes to war and genocide.  However, the english word was first used in the 20th Century, not by colonists in 1600. --Rcollman 01:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ashburton, Victoria

message: Updated to include the drafting of Jasmine Fleming to the WAFL and to correct High Street Road to High Street. Also changed the state electorate to Ashwood District. CrushLily (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

message: As per Wikipedia:External links, external links should not generally appear in the article body. This article has a very large number of them. In my experience, such external links can be replaced to citations to the external link. I suggest each external link is either replaced with a citation or deleted as appropriate. Kerry (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive external links in the article body
Talk:Legends of the Dark Knight (The New Batman Adventures)

message: I reiterate my opinion stated on the JLU Talk Page that there no encyclopedic reason I can fathom that creates the need for this page.--Gillespee 04:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fear that I must TOTALLY agree, but at the risk of creating waves, I will not be nominating this page for merger or deletion. Dyslexic agnostic 05:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Gosh!!--T-man, the wise 08:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual Episode Summaries
Talk:Anglo-Nepalese War

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: This article is pretty poorly written, someone might want to touch it up a bit  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.214.202 (talk) 23:37, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Although there is an unprecedented detail of this war that has survived, sadly the article itself is quite scanty on details. I have listed some references as well as external links that opens to those references. I hope someone will take up the challenge of filling in the details. (Manoguru (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anybody have a source that describes the war from the Nepalese point of view. All the books that I have been able to find were written by the British. (Manoguru (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me this article is incredibly biased in the Nepalese's favour, a more impartial article would be fitting. 128.193.15.52 (talk) 05:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Grievances

message: The BOLD/CAPS part of this sentence in the Trade section doesn't make sense to me: 
" ... The British had made constant efforts to persuade the Nepalese government TO ALLOW THEM THEIR TRADE TO THE FABLED TIBET through Nepal. ... "
Not knowing the reality of this history, I don't feel qualified to change/edit this sentence.  But it would seem to make more sense if it read "... to allow them TO trade WITH the fabled Tibet ... "
Almadenmike (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trade section: Part of this sentence doesn't make sense 

message: The very last line "in 2015 mr tej thapa also along with thapa group in 1815 Nepalese war" does not make any sense to me. Appears some kind of vandalism. --Satyam Mishra --talk-- 20:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 2.3: Border Despute 

message: I've been unable to find the source listed for many of the references in the article. "Smith "Plan of Operation". References to it are very vague and any pointing in the right direction would be appreciated. 86.5.160.43 (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Smith (1852) is a book listed under Secondary sources. "Plan of Operation" is presumably a chapter in it. The write-up is quite old and current citation conventions have not been followed. You can improve them if you wish. The citation should have been something like . -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Properly read 2400:1A00:B1C0:D83A:68B3:55A4:160C:C1D5 (talk) 13:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was anglo Nepal was fought? Between whom
Talk:Whanganui campaign

message: This article needs a better introductory summary to briefly explain what the campaign was and its historical context. Grimhim 07:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Work needed

message: In traditional pre contact and early contact period up to about 1850, accidents were considered just cause (take) for revenge (utu)by Maori. The particular aspect of lore (tikanga) that cover this action is muru (plunder). Accidents were considered to be caused by an atua(spirit of god) and they were not random or true accidents as we understand them now.Maori believed very strongly in vengeful spirits. For examople it was a standard Maori belief that a person could cause harm to another by cursing the person,this is why cursing was considered such a serious crime. Of course as the number of Europeans and their cultural impact increased particularly from the 1860s, Maori became more aware of how Europeans viewed accidents. By 1870s "accidents" if caused by Europeans and effecting Maori could be dealt with by compensation ie goods or increasingly money rather than plunddring the person's property. Pakeha Maori who spoke fluent Te Reo and were familiar with this tikanga considered it a genuine part of Maori culture and not just an opportunity to "rape and pillage" Europeans as they had observed this custom in action between 2 Maori groups many times. This is just one of many examples of culture clash between a primitive society still emerging from the stone age and the most advanced culture in the world at that time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.185.98 (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidental shooting  as a cause of war 

message: Count in the template and in the text dont match. Yug (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kill count 

message: This sentence doesn't seem to make sense. "Aware of danger of artillery fire, and being that the soldiers would not attack their entrenchments, Maori forces would retire the next day, determined not to have peace, ending the war for the winter."
Should the first part be "Aware of danger of artillery fire, and being told that the soldiers would not attack their entrenchments, ... "?
Perhaps " ... Maori forces retired the next day, ... "?
The last part " ... determined not to have peace, ending the war for the winter" seems contradictory ... but I may be misunderstanding what has been written.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 08:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've copyedited it with the sources in front of me. I hope this helps. Richard Keatinge (talk) 10:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack and siege