lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:U.S. Route 40 Alternate (Maryland)

message: This cannot possibly be the only rt 40 alternate in the united states, i know for a fact that there are 2 in maryland, i propose that we rename this article to state that it is one of the ones in maryland, or to put maryland in the title and include both of the alternate rt 40s.Hollowman512 00:39, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, we could treat the Maryland Alt 40 as a single discontiguous road and rename the article "U.S. Route 40 Alternate (Maryland)" since there's an Alt 40 in Nevada and California. –Shoaler (talk) 12:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok cool, since youre the only editor of this page, how bout you make the move so that your name will be at the top of the history. Hollowman512 19:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  only one
Talk:2006 Lebanon War/Archive 31

message: Please express support for only one of the following options, or add an additional option, with an explanation of your reasoning:
====2006 [description of combatants] [description of conflict]====
Comment here
#Support - I actually prefer the combatant-description (2006) title, but pretty much all of the relevant conflicts/wars in this arena follow this format - 1920 Palestine riots, 1948 Arab-Israeli War, 1982 Lebanon War, 1982-2000 South Lebanon conflict,  2006 Israel-Gaza conflict. Iorek85 23:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Issue 1 - Date placement

message: Comment here
#Support - I actually prefer the combatant-description (2006) title, but pretty much all of the relevant conflicts/wars in this arena follow this format - 1920 Palestine riots, 1948 Arab-Israeli War, 1982 Lebanon War, 1982-2000 South Lebanon conflict,  2006 Israel-Gaza conflict. Iorek85 23:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 [description of combatants] [description of conflict]

message: Comment here
#Support Who fought is more important than when. --Doom777 15:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [description of combatants] [description of conflict] (2006)

message: Please express support for only one of the following options, or add an additional option, with an explanation of your reasoning:
====Israel-Lebanon [description of conflict]====
Comment here
# Support - Lebanon was involved, and bore the brunt of the damage. Iorek85 23:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Issue 2 - Description of Combatants

message: Comment here
# Support - Lebanon was involved, and bore the brunt of the damage. Iorek85 23:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Israel-Lebanon [description of conflict]

message: Comment here
# Support  Hizbullah attacked Israael.  Israel responded by attacking Hizbullah.  The Lebanese Army was not involved.  Israel did not declare war on Lebanon.  Lebanon did not declare war on Israel.  Any name that includes Lebanon is inaccurate and POV nonsense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.162.5.7 (talk • contribs).
#:Oppose Lebanese army was involved in several extent like this Anyways, Hezbollah are lebanese and israel has completely destroyed lebanon, so it deserve called Israel-Lebanon war Nielswik 16:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Israel-Hezbollah [description of conflict]

message: Comment here
#Support - After earlier supporting "war" - I don't think the scope of the conflict justifies war. It was too short, pretty much one sided, and didn't result in large numbers of military deaths. If anyone can think of smaller "Wars" then sure. Iorek85 00:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [description of combatants] conflict
Talk:Purdue University Airport

message: It looks like someone just copied all the information from the Purdue University Airport website and pasted it in the article. I have removed the offending content and placed a new version of the page at Talk:Purdue University Airport/Temp. --MJHankel 17:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the infringing revisions and restored the old revisions. —Centrx→talk • 03:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Infringement

message: One wiki page says on thing,another says the other,which is correct?
On the "Purdue" Wikipage it says this:
"Purdue also played a central role in Earhart's ill-fated "Flying Laboratory" project, providing funds for the Lockheed L-10 Electra aircraft she intended to fly around the world. Earhart began her fateful transoceanic flight from the Purdue University Airport.
On the Wikipage "Amelia Earhart" it says this:
"This time flying west to east, the second attempt began with an unpublicized flight from Oakland to Miami, Florida and after arriving there Earhart publicly announced her plans to circumnavigate the globe."
So did she leave from oakland,ca. , miami,fl. or west lafayette,in.?
_BARN_
Otis66Driftwood 21:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Amelia Earhart,Purdue Airport

message: the airport is in 'west lafayette' its a seprate town,'lafayette' and 'west lafayette' are divided by the Wabash river.the portion that says the airport is located 3 miles west of downtown 'lafayette' is correct. the 3 miles its reffering to is 'west lafayette',to get to the airport from downtown 'lafayette' you must leave 'lafayette' and cross the river entering 'wast lafayette',continue west untill reaching the aiport never re-entering 'lafayette'.
"FOUR TILDES" 16:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: INCORRECT INFO...CORRECTED

message: The Aviation section of this article strays from the topic.  While based at the airport, the Department of Aviation Technology at Purdue is a separate entity.  This section needs to be either deleted or expanded and moved to a new article.  I have suggested a title on the main page.
N419BH (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of that information is already in Purdue University as well. VerballyInsanet|c 03:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: aviation section not relevant

message: This article states: "One CD-9 that was based at the airport was operated by Purdue Airlines..." What's a CD-9?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.162 (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: What is it?

message: I believe that Midway Connection flew DHC-8 (Dash 8). I recall using that service many times. Dan Bollinger (talk) 13:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midway Connection
Talk:Re-Flex

message: I guess these aren't the same group ?
* Reflex Lyublyu
* Re-Flex - Babadeng
* re-flex - ubap
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 03:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other bands of the same name ?

message: as in "absolute elsewhere"?
duncanrmi (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  paul fishman?
Talk:Red Guitars

message: look, if there is a legitimate concern that this article should not be here, the best way to go about it would be to do a proper afd as outlined in WP:AFD rather than prod tag warring. that way the community can work on achieving a consensus on its worthiness. sound good? -- frymaster 17:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: please try an afd
Talk:Emily Baldwin

message: Can someone defend this article's worthiness?  This woman seems to be of no real substance other than being 'friends with...' or 'related to...' or 'aunt my marriage...' to other people of little importance.  The argument can be made that others around her may have been of some importance, but this woman herself, not so much. 
I move for removal.63.118.154.94 (talk) 17:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of this article 
Talk:Mangalam, Tiruppur

message: The maps that I have closely inspected show Mangalam as part of the Union Territory of Puducherry, India.  See, for example, http://police.pondicherry.gov.in/Map%20all%20region%20ok/Puducherry%20Map%2025.05.11.htm. I would appreciate someone else offering their thoughts on this, so that it can be corrected if that is the case.
Jeff in CA 11:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of the Union Territory of Puducherry 

message: The map of Mangalam city is incorrect. 
Please change the map. 
Zufair in Dubai, UAE.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.98.51.112 (talk) 11:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong map of Mangalam
Talk:Thomas Dudley

message: The owner of Stirnet Genealogy suspects that Thomas' mother is Dorothy Purefoy instead of Susanna Thorne.  Take a look at http://www.stirnet.com/HTML/genie/british/dd/dudley01.htm#puref.  Comments?  -John Rigali 21:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Parentage

message: Anybody understand this phenomenon of listing all Dudley's celebrity descendants? I don't see any other biographies that do this.  I can't think of any reason why it's a good idea.  Should we remove it? Dcottingham (talk) 19:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Descendants

message: The good revisions in this piece now reflect the fact that "Dudley next entered the service of Sir Augustine Nicolls as a clerk." From most available sources, it appears that Nicolls was a 'kinsman' of Dudley's.  MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice find; why I am not surprised... Magic♪piano 02:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, just wanted to mention that Rev. Samuel Dudley, a minister of Exeter, New Hampshire, was born to Thomas Dudley and his first wife while still in England about 1608. Rev. Samuel accompanied his father to Massachusetts aboard the Arbella in 1630, and went on to become a well-known minister, dying in Exeter in 1683. MarmadukePercy (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: He's currently mentioned, but not his colonial activities.  Considering son Joseph's activities are mentioned, his probably should too. Magic♪piano 16:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Augustine Nicolls 
Talk:Wisdom of repugnance

message: Sources should be moved to footnotes, they do not belong as part of a narrative. More sources needed. Tone should be more formal. —Trevyn 00:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not your term paper 

message: "Kass's real motives for proposing and supporting the concept are also brought into question as a result of his close ties to conservative politicians, and his personal opposition to feminism, gay rights, abortion and other socio-political issues. The wisdom of repugnance has been criticized as an attempt to politicize science, and to justify irrational ideological objections to scientific progress and research."
I moved this portion from the article proper because it seems irrelevant.  The issue at hand is whether wisdom of repugnance is a valid argument, thus the particulars of Kass's supposed political views are suspect material:  he is not even the rightful topic of the article.  Additionally, the statements use passive voice and contain weasel words. 209.30.170.226 06:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance? 

message: The book cited wasn't published until 2002 (according to the Library of Congress US).  It appears that the actual coinage came from a New Republic article (June 2, 1997), which was later included in the book.  I'm 98% sure this is the case.  If anyone has any more info on, please advise.  Otherwise I'll change the article in the next few days. --Cody.Pope 10:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the term?

message: I can't understand the explanation section. And why is it smaller than the origin and criticism sections? --AnY FOUR! (talk) 23:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand 

message: I can't understand the explanation section. And why is it smaller than the origin and criticism sections? --AnY FOUR! (talk) 23:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand 

message: I have the notion that we can work someone of Tolkien's wise prose into this article. Specifically, a line about expecting one of Sauron's agents to 'look fairer and feel fouler'. Anyone know what part I mean? I think it was Frodo referring to Strider. Anyway, is there a place for this in here? Vranak (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord of the Rings 

message: I deleted the following: 
'The wisdom of repugnance is often used to justify so-called "knee-jerk" negative reactions to cloning (particularly of humans), genetic engineering, and other contentious subjects. One who adheres to this thesis may consider it unnecessary ("in crucial cases") to examine an issue logically, or to debate dissenting arguments.'
No source for the first sentence, and the second is just speculation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teaforthetillerman (talk • contribs) 04:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleted unsourced speculation
Talk:WCW Sin

message: Why is the picture of Mysterio masked? Mysterio wasn't wearing his mask during this period. Does anyone have a good unmasked picture that's more era-appropriate? 4.225.31.52 (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Issue 

message: I just read everything there and nothing there supports what was stated . Sid broke his leg at a Nitro event , NOT at this PPV . The clip is on YouTube and I watched it live .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.185.79 (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  the # 17 source does NOT back up the claim  

message: Added tag to request reception section.
172.58.45.53 (talk) 08:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception.
Talk:Catharine Beecher

message: This article leaves out a very important - and maybe the dominant - part of Beecher's work: her role as a key figure in the "cult of domesticity." Yes, she advocated for women's education, but her most famous books are far more about women's role in the home. To leave out this part of her life is a gross misrepresentation of what Beecher stood for.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.58.238.152 (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the "cult of domesticity"? 

message: I can't figure out what it is about this page that makes it such a frequent target for vandalism? I see nothing here that appears to be controversial. So, what's the attraction for all the juvenile idiocy?Aletheia (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this page targeted for vandalism 

message: This article should be filled-out in prose style instead of short lines accented by bullet points.
Offchance (talk) 19:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-Up Request 

message: ...that Catharine Beecher was not the first person to have an "all female orgy." I think this should be deleted from the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.81.178 (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am pretty sure... 

message: The last sentence in the section 'Women as Educators' is an opinion not of Beecher, but of the author of this section. I do not agree that Beecher's work "pushed and transformed teaching" in women's work (I am unsure of what exactly that means), "rather than a profession that women could thrive in". I believe that Beecher pushed and transformed teaching into a profession that would allow women a place in society that included having an independent career. The work conditions were often horrendous, but this was a step in the empowerment of women considering the time period. Thoughts?
:Concur wholeheartedly -- Beecher's work was indeed an important move forward that modern-day Americans have trouble appreciating. The sentence in question expresses a POV, and a not very defensible one at that. Before deleting it (which I'm going to do as soon as I sign off here), I was getting ready to open up my own talk section; thanks for saving me that trouble. -- 2603:6081:8004:DD5:497E:E054:AD55:9B4E (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women as Educators 

message: — Assignment last updated by Igutierrez3 (talk) 17:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: FCS 442 Foundations of Family and Consumer Sciences
Talk:Rip Rig + Panic

message: I believe the band's name is properly rendered as "Rip Rig + Panic" i.e. with a plus sign, not an ampersand. (see Trouser Press). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the page has been renamed today, which sent me back to the records to check. The plus style was used quite a lot on the covers but it's not so clear cut: the LPs and singles sometimes had "and", sometimes had "&". AllyD (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is not 100% clear, that is post-punk for you.  I have created redirects and a disambig page for those seeking the Roland Kirk album. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Band name
Talk:Isabella Beecher Hooker

message: Some of the information in this article is copied from Lyman Beecher Stowe’s, Saints, Sinners, and Beechers, I will try to properly attribute these statements, as part of a general revision and expansion. Pvjoanis (talk) 14:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism issues 

message: I have completed the necessary research to amend this article and will put in one sourced edit to revise the content, this will probably be followed up with a few minor revisions.  I was not able to find reliable sources for all of the content, some of which is speculative. Pvjoanis (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: I have just removed the recent addition of the following quote from the lede. It may be useful to someone wishing to expand the article, but it could use a proper source, and does not belong in the intro as is. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote removed from lede
Talk:Henrietta (song)

message: Should be moved from "Henrietta (single)" to "Henrietta (song)" as that is the general policy... AllySDude 00:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 
Talk:Rosita (band)

message: ..so much been written for so many for so little. Excellent work! This is exactly what WP was made for. . Goodnighteverybody (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never has..,. 

message: I know the source says there were only six dates for the Rosita/Mika Bomb tour in Spring 2000 but in point of fact there were seven - the bands played OXford's Bullingdon Arms on 4th May, the London Bull & Gate show was not until 9 May.  Here is a source for the correct date for the London gig but does anyone have a source for correct 7 date schedule or the Oxford date?  Sources will be needed if a correction is to be made.62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There's another reference here for the London date, but no mention of Oxford or a precise number of dates, just Derby and then "cirka [sic] 6 more gigs".62.190.148.115 (talk) 15:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found an old fanclub letter explaining all.  Apparently the schedule was rearranged. 62.190.148.115 (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of tour dates
Talk:Royal Scottish National Orchestra

message: There seem to have been a few updates to this page recently from the marketing department at the RSNO, with the result that some of the article reads more like a press release than an encyclopedia entry.  I have deleted the following list of sponsors and media partners, which didn't appear to serve any purpose other than advertising the companies in question:
The RSNO's principal sponsors and donors currently include TOTAL E&P UK Limited, Standard Life, First ScotRail, STV, Capital Solutions, the essentia group, The Courier, Western SAAB, Shell UK Limited, Cadenhead's, Springbank Distillers Ltd, Mitchell's Glengyle. The RSNO's Media Partners currently include Classic FM, BBC Radio 3 and The Evening Times.</br>
I have left the rest of it unchanged, but it would be nice if we could get some references to back up claims like "generally regarded as amongst the finest available" and "the second disc in the series was released...to widespread critical acclaim" or else tone them down a bit.  Shuggy77 (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing 

message: Reference to the History of the SNO, written by Conrad Wilson and published in 1993, is now included at foot of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hwyndham (talk • contribs) 23:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You removed the reference list in the process. I've re-added it. Please preview your edits before saving.  --Deskford (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference list
Talk:Rubella Ballet

message: I've given the article a big make-over, removing complete nonsense like The band have become infamous for their different and innovative style of music and the shock value of wearing ultraviolet day-glo clothes to brighten up London's east end, dark, violent, poor, ghettoized, drug dealing, working class shithole that they lived in into a different land as everywhere they went people smiled and laughed instead of wanting to kill them. Also updated the discography, salvaged some info from older versions, and started adding refs. Finding 3rd party sources for refs is quite difficult. Suggestions where to look, anybody? Thanks,    SIS  13:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded the article using Ian Glasper's book, which is the best source I've found on the band.--Michig (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubella Ballet, oct 2008
Talk:Ruby Blue (band)

message: Amazon have a CD in their catalogue dated 2nd March 2004 which is called Skin and is apparently by Ruby Blue. In the UK this is classed as an "import", which probably means it is produced outwith the UK. There is very little other information about the album on the website (although there is a cover shot). None of the track titles are familiar to me. It is possible, therefore, that some other group has resurrected the Ruby Blue name (perhaps not knowing it was already used). No new copies are available to buy (otherwise I might have given it a shot). Does anyone have any more details? Preacherdoc 11:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skin? 

message: I've done a revert. The original band members were Rebecca and Roger only (previously called "R'n'R"). Erika and Anthony joined for Down From Above, and "became permanent members", but then the band split up! Erika and Anthony are uncredited on Glances Askances and Broken Water. Preacherdoc 12:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Members 

message: In Glances Askances, the title is "The Quiet Mind". However, in Down From Above (and on the 12-inch single), the same song has the bit "(for Joe)" added. Does anyone know why this happened? Preacherdoc 12:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Joe?