lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saw pit

message: Per the WP:EL policy, I am removing these external links:
* http://www.rcahms.gov.uk/ RCAHMS Canmore archaeology site
* http://www.flashearth.com/ Satellite Imagery
* http://geo.nls.uk/roy/ General Roy's Military Survey of Scotland 1747 - 52
* http://www.nls.uk/maps/ Old maps of Scotland from the National Library
* http://www.old-maps.co.uk/indexmappage2.aspx  Old Ordnance Survey Maps
* http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/A_Researcher's_Guide_to_Local_History_Terminology  A Researcher's Guide to Local History terminology
Only direct links to relevant content not provided by the article is given to readers in External links, not just vague links to homepages.
* If they are sources used for writing the article AND needed to back up its claims, please list them in the <REF> or References section, with a direct URL to the relevant pages.
* If they are just sources or tools you used to find pictures or format the article (such as the "Researcher's Guide"), you do not need to list them here, but possibly only on the description page of the uploaded images.
* If they are sites with useful content, please provide a direct URL to the content (not to the homepage), or at least short instructions about what the reader is supposed to do to get the relevant content.
Thanks. — Komusou talk @ 22:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed ext links

message: The sole reference given for this (the sawpit) being a possible origin of the phrases 'top dog' and 'underdog' was a page which says "while the saw-pit theory as the origin of 'top dog' and 'under dog' is attractive, the complete lack of evidence to support it renders it as mere speculation.", ie. the reference does not just not support the claim, it contradicts it! No amount of weasel words like 'may' can make that claim suitable for Wikipedia in my view. 
If the story about the origin of the words were widely known, it might merit a sentence along the lines of "The oft-repeated story that ... has no evidence to support it", with a reference to the phrases.org page; but it certainly should not have the better part of a paragraph stating the claim, still less be repeated in the introduction.
However, the paragraph about 'top dog' also contains information about sawing for ship-building, and I'm not sure whether there isn't material in there that should be retained, so I've commented the paragraph out rather than deleting it, in the hope that somebody can rescue what is worth rescuing in there. --ColinFine 00:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topdog/Underdog
Talk:Marsh rabbit

message: This entry was added by Andrew Rutherford, for a class assignment in the Biology of Animals class at University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh. If you have any suggestions for the student or the instructor, please let us know. Thanks! Bio230 (talk) 22:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Mantelletta

message: Ithillion 22:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cume

message: That was a bad merge last year.  The article to which this was redirected didn't even mention the word 'cume'.
The link to the Nielsen definition of cume no longer works...and their new site is difficult to navigate (flashy with no real content).  If someone can find it, we can remove the citation note. --SamMichaels 22:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-created on November 8, 2007
Talk:Robbinsville (CDP), New Jersey

message: Is this really a census-designated place?  There is no reference as such in the article.  VerruckteDan 23:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The better example would have been "Toms River, New Jersey" being renamed to Toms River CDP, New Jersey and "Dover Township, New Jersey" being renamed as Toms River, New Jersey, which was also the result of a ballot referendum passed on an election day. The problem with your rename of "Robbinsville, New Jersey" to Robbinsville CDP, New Jersey is that this Robbinsville is NOT a census-designated place ordained and defined by the United States Census Bureau. We do have borough/township pairs (e.g. Pemberton, New Jersey and Pemberton Township, New Jersey), but I agree that the Robbinsville neighborhood should be differentiated to distinguish it from the township to avoid possible mislinks. Robbinsville, New Jersey should also redirect to the Township (which I've done already. But what should we use instead of "CDP" in the title? Any thoughts? Alansohn 18:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Robbinsville CDP, New Jersey

message: This article aint got no FIPS code.  SOme one of you geezers with a bunch of time on your hands needs to go and get it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.36.165 (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIPS Code
Talk:White House Chief Floral Designer

message: Can somebody fix the formatting glitch in the History section? I can't :-(  Awien 23:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What glitch? --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 23:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit link that's obscuring two words in the fourth line. Awien 01:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Per the article, Ghaffarian is current, but article also refers to “Dowling’s predecessor.” Noting here because I can’t fix it now. Richmintz (talk) 14:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs update
Talk:USS Henrico

message: A brief description of the kamikaze attack and its significance, from Second to None! The Story of the 305th Infantry in World War II, Washington: Infantry Journal Press (1949), p.159:
 "On completion of the operations on Aka Shima, Zamami Shima, and Amuro Shima... the 305th Regimental Headquarters and attached units were loaded aboard the USS Henrico... We were placed in floating reserve status to wait...
On April 2 the Henrico, en troute to the night rendezvous area, was crash-bombed by one of the Kamikaze planes...important documents, records, and maps relative to future operations were destroyed... Colonel [Vincent J.] Tanzola, the C[ommanding] O[fficer], was killed, and many other headquarters personnel were killed or wounded. 
Among the wounded: Maj. Winthrop Rockefeller.-- Deborahjay (talk) 02:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  305th Infantry Regimental HQ, hit in the kamikaze attack
Talk:15th century in Wales

message: At present this article is just a list of people and events without any narrative structure to justify the title; it basically needs tying to gether into a more encyclopedic structure. However, I haven't speedied it because it's clear that this was an important century in welsh history. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 23:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Syntax Error (film)

message: a film should have its own article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.113.223 (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  undid redirect 

message: This film was deleted based on 
I don't think it should be deleted. a stub at the least. the last thing that should be done is redirect it to the director page. Nothing is more bothersome then a page that goes to the wrong place. If I click on a link that goes to Syntax_error_(film) then it should take me to that page...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.113.223 (talk) 16:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  up for deletion
Talk:Telemiracle

message: I am not sure where to look to find an explanation of why a lengthy, well-written article about an annual event that has an entry in a print encyclopedia called "The Encylopedia of Saskatchewan" and which has been recognized by the Guinness World of Records as the most successful telethon per capita for any region on earth would be redirected to a brief write-up that is part of the entry for the larger national organization (Kin_Canada])?  So I have reverted back to the original Telemiracle article for the time being.  
Headtale 23:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. It was a comprehensive, well-written, and referenced article. User:^demon took it upon himself to speedy delete all Kin Canada related articles, which I contend was way out of process as they were clearly not CSD candidates. Fortunately, the Wikipedia process took over and it was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harold_A._Rogers. Another user felt that the articles could be contained within Kin Canada, hence the redirect. As I was still angered by the event, I decided to not edit these articles for a time so I could see them in a more NPOV but, as I said, I concur with your decision to revert to a full article here. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra info

message: There are two links that are dead links.  The one for the first total and the one from NewsTalk 980.  The NewsTalk 980 link isn't dead perse, but it leads the homepage of NewsTalk 980.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Raised article to B class as it seems to have:
# It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited.|B-Class-1=
# It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. |B-Class-2=
# It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.|B-Class-3=
# It is free from major grammatical errors.|B-Class-4=
# It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. |B-Class-5=
# It is written from a neutral point of view. |B-Class-6=
SriMesh | talk 21:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: B class

message: Are we just putting the end totals that are on TV?  Or are we putting the end totals with all received donations?  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 23:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems as though all donations are accounted for just not received.  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 01:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annual Totals 

message: With the Labor Day fund-raiser for muscular dystrophy no longer a telethon and other telethons having gone by the wayside, would it be fair to characterize Telemiracle as one of the last long-form telethons still in production? There are still TV fund-raisers, and they're often labelled as telethons, but other than Telemiracle I do not know of any other 20-hour productions still extant. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 19:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Last of a dying breed?
Talk:Challenger Mountains

message: This article states that the Challenger Mountains are the "most northern range in the world", a claim also made in the article on the Roosevelt Range (Greenland).
It seems to me that the Roosevelt Range is, in fact, further north than the Challenger range.
Smudge (talk) 08:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really the "most northern range in the world"?
Talk:Bhrugubanda

message: Can't find any placed to link at the moment. However, if we can find more info on the story of the sage, this might help. It is possible that Sage Bhrugu is the same as Sage Bhrigu, in which case, maybe a link could be made there? Lex Kitten 23:33, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: De-Orphaning

message: An editor recently nominated this article for speedy deletion, claiming this wasn't a real place.  However, I've found a couple references on Google, notably: . If there are still concerns, please take to WP:AFD.  Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: hmmm...appears to be my error for nominating. My apologies.--CastAStone//(talk) 18:54, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax claim 
Talk:Militia Clause

message: These discuss militia and Switzerland:
*Constitutional Project for Corsica, Jean-Jacques Rousseau
*Considerations on the Government of Poland, Jean-Jacques Rousseau
*Defense of the Constitutions of the United States, Letter XXIX, John Adams
*Spirit of Laws, Book XIII, Charles de Montesquieu
*Freedom's Frontier, Ch. 2, Clarence Streit
*The Law of Nations, Book III, ch. 1, Emmerich de Vattel
*Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1788, Speech of Patrick Henry
*The Commonwealth of Oceana, James Harrington
*Plato Redivivus, Second Dialogue, Henry Neville.
Armée Suisse. This book is issued annually by the Swiss government and is sold in most book stores. It contains all things that a citizen-soldier in Switzerland must know. It discusses their rights and privileges, strategy and tactics, equipment and organization and the role of the individual citizen-soldier. The photographs of current equipment are interesting and the accompanying text is fully descriptive. The 1988 edition contains 372 pages of fine print text. Soldiers must buy this booklet out of their own funds. 
Jon Roland 23:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:New England String Ensemble

message: A nice article but it is in dire need of sources other than self-published material. Reliable published works, such as (for example) newspaper articles, books, and published reports that are *independent of the subject* and not merely trivial coverage are what are needed. I'll put a tag on it to encourage editors to look for and find such sources. --Malcolmxl5 23:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Secret Agent Clank

message: I fixed a lot of the bad grammar in this article. I tried to fix the references throughout but I have no idea how to do that and kind of messed it up a little, so if anyone wants to fix that, that would be great.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radioactive Cactus (talk • contribs) 05:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I've noticed vanadalism in the article and previously in the history I noticed vanadalism was reverted by another user. Why is this article being targeted more than others? Someone posted "THIS GAME SUCKS ____" and a few other things which I reverted under Gameplay. ~NeonFire372~ 23:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: The code is wrong, I saw it. Theres an X in the end. I'm not sure about the rest, but I'm sure about the X. And can we use right, left... instead of R, L...? So can anyone fix this, since I'm not sure about the code.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.3.32.54 (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Code

message: I'm getting tired of people saying  "thats not allowed" to me... if going to tell me the rules then i want an link and a quote saying that it not allowed. Furry Fury (talk) 20:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:NOTCRYSTAL.  Don't revert without further discussion. Nakon 20:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, you should probably stay away from these articles due to your WP:COI. Nakon 20:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: WP:NOTCRYSTAL states that # Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. the release it official and has been confirmed. and you will see the date posted in the article already Furry Fury (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  After throughly disproving all reasons why it the countdown timer shouldn't be in the page, I finally got a post a reason what actually applies. While the countdown timer breaks NO rules is is perfectly valid to put on the page, is accurate, verifiable, neutral, non-disruptive, and puts no stress on the servers. It does pose 1 error... The refresh button will not work for any person who isn't a registered on Wiki, do to the fact that they cannot purge the page User Group Rights. On those grounds, the timer would classify as inaccurate to any non registered user, thus making not acceptable to be posted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furry Fury (talk • contribs) 03:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Undo

message: I removed some references because they weren't really citing anything. It seemed to me that they were just placed there randomly. I am at my school right now, so I can't check the pages to see what should be on the article for it to cite, so when I get home I will do it, unless someone else wants to add these back in.
*GameStats: Secret Agent Clank
GameRankings - Secret Agent Clank
Game Revolution: Secret Agent Clank Review
Thanks. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References I removed
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Satanic ritual abuse and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

message: *:Did my intro while nominating not mean anything? I made it very clear it was NOT WP:COI. Who cares what church I belong to? This article needs to be merged and or deleted altogether. Speculation is ridiculous. You are not assuming good faith. 'Nomination is possibly motivated by WP:COI' is rude and speculative and this is not the place for it. I nominated this article because it was suggested to me that I do. Not for any other reason, besides I suppose my own desire to see this article go the way of so many other POV and biased articles that make allegations only in an attempt to  make a group or organization look poorly. Carter | Talk to me 15:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tough beans. Merely asserting lack of COI does not make it so. I've reviewed your comments on that page and elsewhere and you've repeatedly attacked editors (including me) for anti-Mormon bias in ways that stretch your credebility and strain AGF. You don't come across as a neutral or disinterested party, that's all. Snocrates 20:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither does saying that WP:COI applies make it so. Don't pretend like you've not attacked me as well. Shall we review your comments or have you deleted them already? "Apparently WP:NOT#DEMOCRACY means I'm in charge." Sound familiar? Also, I found it odd that when I tried to warn you about attacking other editors, you simply deleted the warning as if nothing was wrong. I suggest that before making allegations Snocrates, you make sure they could not also be made about you. This isn't theplace to debate that issue anyways. Stick to the article. Carter | Talk to me 23:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I never said it did make it so. I said "may", i.e., it was a suspicion raised by me. Other editors can look at it and evaluate it themselves. I stand by all my comments and don't delete them like others do. (I do delete others' comments from my talk page b/c I've specifically asked for issues not to be addressed there—see the hard-to-miss header on the page.) Your potential COI is very relevant to the nomination and I also stand by my raising the issue. You can make any allegation you want against me — as you have before — and editors are free to take that in to account when assessing my opinions and actions. Likewise, you've nominated here, so your actions and motivations are relevant. Snocrates 23:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re Snocates's opinion

message: :*If there is no concern over the content of the article, but only with the title of the article, proposing deletion is superfluous and not appropriate. Proposals for moves/renaming/merging are not properly made through the AFD process. And if you have no concern over the content of the article, why is your vote for deleting unless it is being used as a means of censoring? Snocrates 05:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And to whom do you ascribe the subjective "intent" of the article? Snocrates 23:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re Storm Rider's opinion
Talk:List of environmental philosophers

message: There shouldn't be black or red links in this article.  If a person is not notable enough to have their own article, they shouldn't be in this list.  Corvus cornix 19:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List members without articles
Talk:Hugh McCracken

message: Greetings All,
Have started this long-overdue article 'cos keep coming across his name on all kinds of major recordings and have been unable to find out much about him except a never-ending list of albums he appears on. Please help. Thanx. --Technopat 00:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Coning and quartering

message: Seems to me that, aside from a description of the technique and maybe a brief historical note, there's not a whole lot more to be said... i.e., it'll likely stay a stub.  Any reason not to merge it into an article about other related techniques? - Jaeger5432 | Talk 07:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Sub-sampling
Talk:Assam roofed turtle

message: This page should be renamed to Sylhet roofed turtle as it matches the Latin scientific name more and is more widely known as that. UserNumber (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The name should be Pangshura sylhetensis as most sources use this name. Za-ari-masen (talk) 09:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , can you please move this. The current name is very misleading.UserNumber (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Vatican Publishing House

message: Please don't delete.  I would have thought that the statement that this is the publishing house set up by the ruling body of an organisation with over a billion members would suffice as an assertion of notability. Phil Bridger 00:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It suffices to avoid speedy deletion per A7, but it doesn't meet WP:CORP. I have changed the speedy nom to a prod, to give you a chance to work on the article. What would assert the notability of this publishing house per WP:CORP is for instance a list of books it has published. AecisBrievenbus 01:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:List of neighborhoods in Newark, New Jersey

message: Downtown is not in the Central Ward, but the East Ward.  See the city's official site:    .  "This ward is broken into three neighborhoods, Ironbound, Dayton and the Downtown section"  199.89.180.65 00:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:10TP

message: Reading this article explains why Poland lost the war in two weeks. All those panzer divisions next door and the Poles come up with just one lousy prototype by 1939 because they had to wait for an engine? Jesus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.240.148.68 (talk) 02:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crossgates Coaches

message: The routes on this page are getting very messy. May i suggest that routes go in strict numeric then alpabetical order OR by depot name then a list of routes?
:Numerical order may be helpful when considering all the services in an area, since there will be a single numbering system in place which may or may not be rationalised.  However, given that Veolia operates services all over the place, the services are numbered according to differing local practice.  For example, service 26A in Cardiff lies between services 25 and 27, whereas service 25 in Swansea is so numbered for historical reasons.  I imagine this is what User:85.92.190.81 had in mind when undoing the confusion.  Perhaps first arranging them by location and then numerically would be better?  90.203.45.214 (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The current state also gives a full inventory of what is operated.  It just presents it (or could present it if cleaned up) in a clearer manner than a jumble of services.  If there were a uniform numbering system (as with e.g. London buses), I could understand placing them in numerical order, but there isn't, so it's just confusing.  90.203.45.214 (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Routes

message: Someone suggest that we merge Bebb Travel into this article. Agreed, and now done. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bebb Travel

message: Despite it's word count, this is still a stub article due to the amount of informative text. This article is really a list of routes rather than an article on the company. Assessing as such. FruitMonkey (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assess 
Talk:Louise Rennison

message: This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 21:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassified as a start

message: Her passing away was announced on 29th of february http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-35690685], so date is unsure. However this article states that she died on the 29th... Saschaporsche (talk) 09:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  passing away: date 