Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sudan

message: Is there anyone residing in Khartoum and owning a camera? I would need someone making photos in the National Museum. Let me know if anyone here is interested. LeGabrie (talk) 20:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone residing in Khartoum? 

message: Anyone interested in improving a draft on this developing story, which has gone to WP:AFC? If so, see Draft:2018 Sudanese Protests. Regards from the Teahouse, Nick Moyes (talk) 10:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 Sudanese Protests 

message: The sketches in this 1919 notebook, by Abel Chapman, may be of interest. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sketches of birds 

message: Hosted by the Wikimedia Community User Group Uganda, the first ever virtual Wiki Indaba conference is taking place online from the 5th to the 7th of November 2021 under the theme Rethink + Reset : Visions of the future. 
Wiki Indaba 2021 is a unique opportunity to come together to build the capacity of African Wikimedians both within the continent and the diaspora to foster the growth of the coverage and our involvement in Wikimedia projects. 
The call for submissions is open, please submit your session proposal either as a presentation, panel discussion, lightning talk, or workshop before September 24th 2021.
Most importantly, we would like to have you at the conference, please register here to get your free ticket and spread the word to your community members.
Looking forward to seeing you and hearing you speak at the conference.
Geoffrey Kateregga (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Indaba 2021 is here! 

message: Hello,Please note that First Sudanese Civil War, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Hi there! This is a notice that I have opened an individual Good Article reassessment on the article Sudan women's national football team, which falls under the domain of this WikiProject. The review can be seen at this link (Talk:Sudan women's national football team/GA3) and any editor is welcome to help fix it up so that it can maintain GA status. Thanks! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of Good Article reassessment 

message: Hi this article has been nominated for deletion. It didn’t have the WikiProject Sudan project template on it at the time, which I’ve now added. Members of this project may have views on the notability of the topic. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 11:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Waterman's Prophecy]] 

message: These articles were proposed for deletion. Posting here so that members of this project can add more about notability. Joofjoof (talk) 08:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Joofjoof I hope they get deleted. You either do a good job and make a decent article to start with or do not just make thousands sub-stubs articles to increase article count and ask people then to bring them to the point where they are actually viable articles. see this FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:32, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mohamed Musa Gadou]] and [[Dafallah Sultan Farah]] 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: *Hi everyone, - I just added some general notes on the cultural bias of sources in English and non-Arab writers to the talk page of my GA on the Music of Sudan. - Maybe some of you would like to join in a discussion about this? - Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Music_of_Sudan#Sources_in_Arabic_about_music_of_Sudan,_part_one
Munfarid1 (talk) 06:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussions removed from the main page 

message: Hello WikiProject Sudan: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Kushite religion has officially been nominated for Wikipedia Good Article. MiddleOfAfrica (talk) 22:08, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It normally takes month for the article to be reviewed, having said that, the article need some copy editing. I will put some pointers that I hope it will help. Just know that standard for writing for GA is high and it is better to go through WP:MOS FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @MiddleOfAfrica well that was quick! But please don’t be discouraged. GA standard is very high and you were very lucky to have a reviewer with such good insights and experience. Hope you can take the comments on board and improve the article further. You always ping the reviewer to check your work again before you re-submit it FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh no, I love constructive criticism. I actually agree with the reviewer's feedback. When I rewrote the Kongo religion article, I was able to be completely analyze and explore more aspects of the religion because I had more sources available to me. I just need to acquire more sources and restructure the article to focus more on the actual religion. I definitely see the issues with the article in its current state. MiddleOfAfrica (talk) 23:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nominations: Kushite religion 

message: I think we should start compiling a list similar to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources but with focus on Sudan. Let’s call it Wikipedia:WikiProject Sudan/Perennial sources .. FuzzyMagma (talk) 06:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of reliable sources  

message: Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries. 
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Sudan is listed as a least-developed country for the purposes of this contest, which means Sudan-related submissions to the contest will get a multiplier in points. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content! 
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today! 
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 15:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DCWC|Developing Countries WikiContest]]