lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:London Buses route PR2

message: The article currently says:
:In March 2007, route PR2 replaced the discounted section of PR1 between Park Royal and Willesden Junction.
It is not clear from this what happened to the full fare section of PR1. And it would be good to at least reference why a discount was offered on the section that became the PR2, as this would AFAIK be the only discount offered in this way by London Buses. There is no reference to follow up, so I have requested one by adding the fact tag. -- Chris j wood 12:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Standard fares apply (applied) on both route PR1 and PR2. Route PR1 was withdrawn (they probably meant discontinued) on 24 March 2007, and replaced by extensions of routes 226 and PR2. Denham331 19:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doh. I should have realised that. -- Chris j wood 12:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discounted section of PR1
Talk:Thomas Lunsford

message: I have deleted and recreated this article as a stub.
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. -- PBS (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyleft problems 
Talk:Thomas Lupo the elder

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  The article is B-class, but it could use a few things; read my detailed review on the comments page.  Leave comments here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:13, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Thomas Mayhew

message: Nantucket is its own county, while the article implies that it's part of Duke's.  Changing the wording to fix that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tancrisism (talk • contribs) 03:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  change to "Duke's County" 

message: My name is Johnathan Hugh Bray. I have him in my family tree I found out on FamilySearch website. His daughter Hannah Mayhew married to my 12th great grandfather Thomas Doggett. JBSharkKing89 (talk) 03:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Mayhew are my 13 great grandfather!
Talk:Sir Thomas Morgan, 1st Baronet

message: I have deleted this article and recreated it as a stub.
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. --PBS (talk) 21:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyleft problems
Talk:Playa Grande Ixcán

message: There is still a page called Playa Grande.  It is a stub.  It is incorrectly named.  I suggest that the Playa Grande page be deleted, or redirected here.r3 01:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The actual name of the municipality is Ixcán. Playa Grande is the so called "cabecera municipal" (administrative centre). I suggest to change the name of the article to "Ixcán", and to link it with the Spanish version, as well. Unfortunately I don't know how to do that, I'm new here... I'm registered in the Spanish version of Wikipedia as Gematrad, for any comments you may have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.27.211.241 (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name for the article
Talk:Thomas Mun

message: Hi, all! It could be a good idea to provide a transcription for Mun. AFAIK, it is [s∧n], like in sun, but since Thomas Mun lived a long time ago, there's a risk to come across a specific variant of pronunciation. Thanx in advance, Cherurbino (talk) 07:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcription needed 

message: That can't possibly be a portrait of Mun. Dress and hairstyle are that of a 19th century person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.21.77 (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: portrait?
Talk:Bradbury–Nielsen shutter

message: Here's a gate off schematic that doesn't fit the article since it's so small (at least at this point). --Kkmurray 03:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The image should probably be linked: Schematic top view of a Bradbury-Nielsen shutter with voltages off (transmitting). --Kkmurray (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gate off image

message: May I kindly suggest to rename the article Bradbury–Nielsen Gate, which is the usual denomination (see the reference articles), and to redirect Bradbury–Nielsen shutter to this renamed page ? Ileresolu (talk) 08:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that you are correct. Google Scholar has about twice as many hits for "gate" as for "shutter." Google itself also favors "gate."  --Kkmurray (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  shutter or gate ?
Talk:Thomas Neale

message: #This appears to need a succession box for master of the Mint.  
#He appears to have been an MP for Ludgershall (UK Parliament constituency) 1679-85 and 1690-8 requiring more succession boxes.  
#Is this the same Thomas Neale, whom I have come across promoting companies in the 1690s? 
#The widow whom he married in 1694 should be named.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement?
Talk:Old Tom Parr

message: However, he was blind and feeble when the Earl of Arundel met him, so it seems that he was very old, possibly a centenarian. Which one? There are about 5 different people this could be. --Ragemanchoo (talk) 20:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed so: the 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd or 23rd in fact. Extremely sexy (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In answer, if we assume this to be the Earl at time of Parr's death, it would be the 14th (parenthetically 19th) Earl, whose title was restored to him in 1604 and died in 1646.Cloptonson (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Which [[Earl of Arundel]]?

message: Winnington where he lived had a wikilink connecting to Winnington, Cheshire, near Northwich. I have created a redlink Winnington, Shropshire to distinguish this from the Cheshire Winnington.Cloptonson (talk) 12:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added at Winnington (disambiguation) with a target to this article. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Winnington

message: A modern autopsy would not have found him to be under 70 years old if he was married for 60 years of his life, and there was a 12 year gap between his marriages. Nate Rybner 05:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Thomas Pell

message: Can you imagine City Islanders invading New Amstedam and winning? LOL
Supercool Dude 22:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Imagine

message: The article currently has him being born in 1612, a year after his younger brother John, which doesn't make sense. The source for this Feb. 28, 1612 birth date appears to be the Bathsua Makin biography, but this source only says that he was baptized on that date, not born. Earlier versions of the article used a more reasonable 1608 year of birth. I plan to restore the 1608 date and supply a reasonably good source for it, unless somebody objects to the change in the next ten minutes or so. Cheers, Eleuther (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Thomas Randolph (poet)

message: There is NO way this opening paragraph can be true, give what he wrote as described in the last two paragraphs. Wis2fan (talk) 03:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 

message: Most of this article is the encyclopedia Britannia article footnoted in notes. Not the outrageous claims. Wis2fan (talk) 04:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The text
Talk:Thomas Roe

message: More modern scholarship can be seen in: Michael Strachan, ‘Roe, Sir Thomas (1581–1644)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, Sept 2004; online edn, Jan 2008 accessed 3 March 2008. The EB 1911 is going on 100.Wloveral (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DNB

message: drinking alcohol? the Emperor would have been muslim surely? thus didnt driink.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.229.75 (talk) 22:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drinking Partner?
Talk:Medialab

message: The article doesn't state what medialab is. Squids'and'Chips 01:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did my best to help, so as to distinguish it from MIT Media Lab, which is probably what most people are looking for.  I don't read French but from what I can tell it is a post-production company.  It is probably notable though not a big company, and ought to be sourced and cited. Wikidemo (talk) 18:11, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context
Talk:Peggy Wood

message: Peggy also speaks the final line of the movie--"What is this sin, my children?"
:I'm no expert but I VERY much doubt this is true.  From my recollection of having seen the movie half a dozen times over the years, the nuns play no further part in the movie after Maria's marriage to Captain von Trapp.  A lot happens after that, and there were no nuns in the final scenes where the family escapes from the concert hall and over the mountains.  --  JackofOz (talk) 07:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They were. While the Von Trapps are in hiding the Nazis search the Abbey for them. Two nuns remove parts of their car and confess their sins to the reverend mother, where she speaks this line. 2600:1702:1610:C50:16A:8860:2B02:C933 (talk) 22:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Final line in Sound of Music

message: Coward wrote the leading role... with Gertrude Lawrence in mind, but the vocal demands of the part were beyond her capabilities. His second choice, Evelyn Laye, refused the role... Coward's third choice, Peggy Wood, made a considerable success in the part...
:Surprised that this is not represented in her career summary. Valetude (talk) 01:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starring in Bittersweet
Talk:Thomas Sutton

message: A few days ago I came across The Percy Anecdotes. Could it be true?
https://books.google.nl/books?id=aQQPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA248&lpg=PA248&dq=Elisabeth+Bank+Genua+Venedig+Armada&source=bl&ots=UN_qwMa89N&sig=824OrO5rHd0P5eFH15gViLrD9Ws&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPlf_74tbXAhXkC8AKHf0hCPsQ6AEIRDAG#v=onepage&q&f=false
Thomas Sutton seems to have been involved.
Regards, Taksen (talk) 11:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting snippet and plausible, but the old encyclopedia sources linked in his wiki biog don't mention it, and this source is not reliable.Shtove (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Interesting find, but definitely not the same guy. Queen Elizabeth 1 died in 1603, long before Thomas Sutton the pirate was born. TheLastBrunnenG (talk) 00:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armada
Talk:Thomas Sydenham

message: He is reported to have said, "A man is as old as his arteries", respecting the elasticity of the aorta. Cited in a Science perspective by Hellmut G. Augustine and Johnathan Kipnis "Vascular rejuvenation is geroprotective", 30 July 21 vol 373 issue 6554 pp 490-491. Their citation is H. Tanaka, Hypertension 74. 237 (2019)
--AJim (talk) 13:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  a quote to track down
Talk:Thomas Tesdale

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: ODNB (see also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Hydeblake; content pasted in here). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been removed and replaced with earlier text and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Thomas Tomkins

message: The accepted view of genalogists appears to be that Thomas only had one son, Nathaniel, described as Prebendary of Worcester Cathedral (1599-1681) and vicar of Martin Husingtree.  However, Nathaniel Tomkyns BD bought a share in the manor of Little Inkberrow in 1680, which his widow settled on Pakington Tomkyns in 1712: Victoria County History, Worcs III, 423.  Ibid. IV, 136, shows how the manor of Martin in Martin Husingtree passed from John Haselock to his widow Isabel, who married successively Guy Hall and Nathaniel Tomkyns DD.  John Duncumbe, Collections towards history and antiquities of the County of Hereford II (1), 73 says that John Tomkins, a free burgess of Bromyard bought Buckenhill in Bromyard (who married Miss Eyre), and that dwscended to Nathaniel (who married Miss Baynham), Packington (who married Mary Bohun), George (died 1768), and his brother Thomas (whose son Packington George sold buckenhill in 1804, and was living in bath in 1812.  The marriage of Nathaniel the Prebendary (after 1653) was very late in life.  Could he have married before?  Could they all be related?  My interest in this concerns Thomas Tomkyns, son of Packington Tomkyns.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Could Nathaniel have married before Isabella Folliott? My sources (Tuttles and Boden - the latter a very careful biographer) give no hint of a previous marriage. If you're a genealogist and suspect that the research is warranted, I can but encourage you to proceed. In fact, the subject is hardly relevant to this article, and an independent article on Nathaniel would be required (which would be very nice). However, you're stymied by the "original research" restrictions...! Nick Michael (talk) 22:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 

message: Can we lay to rest the notion that Tomkins was Welsh? His happening to have been born there doesn't make him Welsh. His parents moved from Cornwall to Wales a few years before he was born (probably for reasons of employment), and he lived there until he was maybe no more than 14, when he moved permanently back to England. There is no justification for calling him Welsh. Nick Michael (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  English, not Welsh 
Talk:East Falmouth, Massachusetts

message: I removed this from the article; it looks like otherwise non-notable commercial spam:
:Seacoast Shores is an approximately 950 home peninsula located in East Falmouth. The Seacoast Shores Association maintains many right of ways and a beautiful private beach. Bayside Beach was replenished in recent years and has since become even more popular among the residents.
AJD 01:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seacoast Shores 
Talk:Thomas Weelkes

message: We give his date of burial as 1 December, with no date of death.  Grove V says he died on 30 November.  They explain that his will was made on 30 November and he was buried on 1 December, and that "these facts point to his having died on 30 November".  It would be most unusual to be buried on the very day of death, and he couldn't have died earlier than 30 November, so I agree with Grove that he must have died on 30 November.  --  JackofOz (talk) 00:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: The separate article List of compositions by Thomas Weelkes has apparently been deleted. Fair enough. But that leaves us with nothing at all of his compositions in this article, despite Weelkes' importance both in his own time and today; many of his works are still part of the standard repertoire in church choirs and madrigal groups. Does anyone know how to retrieve the deleted article & incorporate at least some of Weelkes' best known works in this article? --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Compositions
Talk:Hoshina Masatoshi

message: It is spelled 'Hoshino' not 'Hoshina'. TaylorSAllen 01:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Here Is Germany

message: Excuse me, but how is any of this "Germanophobia"? Feketekave (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How isn't it? It's a completely one-sided argument against the German people painting them as inherently evil, democracy-hating devils. --68.187.197.146 (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excuse me
Talk:Thomas Willis

message: Please see fr-wikipedia or de-wikipedia for links to the complete works online. JmCor (talk) 04:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete works online 

message: (discussion begun on Kerowyn's talk page, alternated between talk pages so copied here for readers to follow)
Hi Kerowyn, What's not to like about this heading? Eddaido (talk) 02:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase filial piety isn't very encyclopedic, plus it suggests a peculiarly Chinese idea. --Kerowyn  Leave a note  03:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it would seem your education is lacking (if you think it is a Chinese idea) I'll fix it, don't you worry. Eddaido (talk) 03:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at this— pietas. Eddaido (talk) 03:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It still isn't encyclopedic. The word "monument" or "memorial" conveys the same idea and is more in line with an encyclopedia style. Kerowyn  Leave a note  04:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: and this " Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee." from Ten Commandments Eddaido (talk) 06:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not arguing about the existence of the concept. I'm saying that the use of it in this context is not encyclopedic. Incidentally, if you happen to have a citation for the fact that Browne built the church as a memorial to Thomas Willis, that would be great. Kerowyn  Leave a note  16:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it would probably be easier to move this discussion to the talk page. I've asked for some other opinions there. Kerowyn  Leave a note  16:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Hi again - please note I have never expressed a wish to discuss this matter on my talk page. Eddaido (talk) 01:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Filial piety

message: A particular editor has written most of this article. I will be happy to abide by his judgement as to what if any of my insertion should remain to keep the article balanced and integrated. I'll let Charles Matthews know. Eddaido (talk) 02:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a section for "Family" right at the end, as is conventional, and placed the material on Fenny Stratford church as a subsection in it. I see that the ODNB has details of the architects used (Edward Wing then John Simmonds) and the Gothic style used, but that's for the other article. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:37, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice, thanks for your help! Kerowyn  Leave a note  23:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me.  Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 00:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Solution
Talk:Robert and Thomas Wintour

message: His brother was in parliament .... is there any evidence that he too was an inside man? The last anon change tried to imply there was. Victuallers (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was Wintour a member or not?  Apparently he travelled to Rome for the Jubilee, but according to Fiona Bengsten at the same time he was under lock and key. Parrot of Doom 16:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essex rebellion 

message: I've removed a big chunk of this article's text as its a clear copyright violation of this page.  The text was added in these edits by an anon IP, a few weeks before I began work on the article.
This of course means that the article currently doesn't make a lot of sense.  I shall endeavour to have it restored by the end of the day. Parrot of Doom 16:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Tianqi Emperor

message: ==Untitled==
It is unclear who had two palaces, one for his male lovers, the other for his female lovers. As the article currently reads, it could be either the Emperor or the eunuch Wei. Furthermore, there is nothing about this in the cited reference.Bill (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Palaces

message: It is unclear who had two palaces, one for his male lovers, the other for his female lovers. As the article currently reads, it could be either the Emperor or the eunuch Wei. Furthermore, there is nothing about this in the cited reference.Bill (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I'm Rick James

message: I removed the plot synopsis as all of it was copy/pasted from the official film's website which was a copyright violation. It would be great if someone familiar with the film could write up a new plot summary and is, obviously, not copy/pasted from any website. Cheers  AngelOfSadness  talk  21:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The plot synopsis
Talk:Tokugawa Tadanaga

message: wondering what his "misconduct" was that led to his being forced into seppuku?
I've heard various stories 
 * slaughtered all the animals on a sacred mountain that hunting was forbidden on
 * cut the fetus out of a pregnant peasant woman 
 * held a tournament forcing 22 samurai to fight to the death and had those that refused to fight be shot  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.90.14.74 (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  misconduct?