lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Red colobus

message: The article says: "The Western Red Colobus is frequently hunted by the Common Chimpanzee."  The citation, "[3] ^ Ebola Cote d'Ivoire Outbreaks", does not say "frequently hunted".  Rather it says: "Their diet is primarily vegetarian". The citation is not about hunting by chimps.  It is about an Ebola disease outbreak in chimps. My Flatley (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meat eating in chimps 

message: I made a dummy edit about this subject on this article. If you look at the article for this genus on itis.gov, you'll notice that there are several other species that are not mentioned in this article. Can I add these species into the article? Itis.gov seems to be a reliable source, as many high-quality and high-importance articles on this wiki use it.--SkyGazer 512  talk / contributions / subpages 01:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add new species
Category talk:Wikipedians against notability

message: #It is interpreted as policy on AfD when it's just some essay. -- Chris Ccool2ax  contrib.
#Wiki is not paper.  Nuff said.  However, this is also an issue for the Inclusionists. - Smeelgova 08:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons to oppose the notability doctrine 

message: *If you all started a Wikipedia:WikiProject, that explained your reasoning and such a little better, more people would probably think of joining.  As it stands, your current position and specifics are not easily understood.  Just how much "notability" are you against?  Is there a minimum level still required?  These would all be interesting issues to delve into with a Wikipedia:WikiProject.  It will be interesting to see how this discussion page and issue develops over time.  Yours, Smeelgova 08:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hear, hear. Actually just a short user essay would be nice to explain why people join this category. Currently, it's only defended by two slogans, "Wiki is not paper" (agree) and "notability is a popularity contest". Sadly, the latter slogan carries some truth, but I would like to see an alternative inclusion principle. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:   https://www.gwern.net/In-Defense-Of-Inclusionism This is the best essay about it I've seen so far. Benjamin (talk) 03:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   Benjamin (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Project

message: *This category should be renamed to something like:  Wikipedians who think notability is not a popularity contest but an issue of verifiability.  Yours, Smeelgova 23:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or even just simply:  Wikipedians who think notability is not a popularity contest.  Yours, Smeelgova 23:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming the category

message: Is it normal for this category to be in the same category? It makes a category tree go on branching ad infinitum in itself... -- Mentifisto 04:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is, I've removed the catagory from itself. Guest9999 (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category in the category 

message: Marking notability is important. Notability reassures me that someone out there actually uses all the math you can find on here, and makes me spend time on a lot of things I wouldn't assuming it didn't contribute to my general knowledge at all. Articles on non-notable subjects could have a notice, like the cleanup templates. This way users can tell the difference between widely used but technical subjects and complete trivia. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 04:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategy: non-notable template. Inclusion: Orphanhood
Talk:Columbia, North Carolina

message: I went through the whole page - there is nothing that reads or feels like advertising - please advise. il
It reads like one to me. Don't take off templates unless you've made a difference. --Jnelson09 00:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Miami Marlins all-time roster

message: Hello,
To be of any use, this page really should include information on why exactly these players are notable. Travelbird 12:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to WP:Notability, anyone who has played a sport at the highest professional level is notable. --Kathy A. 22:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Actually, I may bring this whole subject up over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball, because it would be good to have a standard answer for all of the all-time rosters.
The intro to Florida Marlins all-time roster says the page is for people who have appeared in at least one game for the Marlins, as listed on mlb.com. Unfortunately, the mlb.com list includes anyone who has ever been on the 40-man roster, whether they appeared in a game or not. Should the people who have never appeared in a game be weeded out? --Kathy A. 22:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The concensus reached at Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball is that the all-time rosters should only include people who have played a game during the regular season. --Kathy A. 20:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on who to include 

message: How about a numerical all-time roster?-DANO- (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Idea
Talk:Tar paper

message: Re the suggestion that 'Roofing Felt' gets merged with 'Tar paper':
Is tar paper the primary term? I know you'd get blank looks here in the UK if you asked for that instead of roof felt. Also, I notice in a googlefight, there's 1.3m entries for 'roof felt', versus 388k for 'tar paper' (UK only). On google as a whole, those figures are 18m vs 13m; and an awful lot of those pages are worded like so: 'roofing felt (tar paper)' or 'felt paper (tar paper)' (ie the 'felt' usage is primary). I also had a look at US online suppliers like ebuild.com - no listing for tar paper, but plenty of roofing felt. In short, I think the merge should go the other way! Bazzargh 12:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The following paragraph looks a bit odd...
They are also incredibly lightweight, with signifant more strength, the initial product came out in the marketplace in 2003 by Interwrap Inc with its Titanium UDL 30. This felt also comes in the breathable variation, which allows water vapour to pass through the felt which, when used in conjunction with proper ventilation, helps minimize condensation in loft spaces.
I'm removing some of the adjectives which give the seemingly unnecesary emphasis. I've removed the reference to the company as well. nonick (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 

message: There is little information that is accurate or useful in the original entry or the subsequent comments.  It confuses cotton rag felt with paper, coal tar with asphalt, steep-sloped roofing underlayments with low-sloped roofing base and cap sheets, and synthetic roofing underlayments with synthetic siding underlayments.  It should be deleted in its entirety. "Tar paper" is an archaic term still used as builder jargon for asphalt-saturated building felt (building paper is asphalt saturated/coated kraft paper). There should be a section written for steep-sloped roofing underlayments, another one for siding underlayments/weather-barrier/air-barriers and another one for built-up asphalt roofing systems.  They are not related in any relevant way. (Restreet (talk) 14:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: This article confuses tar paper with asphalt felt paper and is unreferenced so I am moving information clearly related to asphalt felt paper to Bituminous waterproofing#Roofing felt. I believe tar paper is obsolete but I will research it. Jim Derby (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved information 

message: How about some mention/discussion of tar paper shacks, both as structures and as an American cultural trope?
I'm having trouble finding an authoritative source, but there are interesting links here, here, and here.  JMT32 (talk) 18:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tar paper shacks
Template talk:England squad 1966 FIFA World Cup

message: I'm in two minds whether this template ought to be red, as that's the colour most associated with this particular team. ArtVandelay13 12:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only in one match. Templates should show the first choice colours. The use of any alternative colours would be down to a personal decision by an editor and can lead to an unnecessary precedent and a POV representation.  Using first choice colours means that only the shades of colours are for discussion.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  14:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that it is POV though - you could make the clear distinction that this is the only team to win their country's only World Cup in their second kit. As I say, this is the colourscheme most associated with this team. ArtVandelay13 13:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: It's a list of a squad for a tournament, not a team for a match. I dislike the idea of applying different criteria to one template based on coincidence. It also looks a mess when sandwiched between white ones.  Sʟυмgυм • т • c  14:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Qwghlm 16:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:England Squad 1966 World Cup}}
Talk:Smíchov

message: *I replaced the image :Image:Busy centre of Smichov Prague CZ 713.jpg, showing Anděl from the south, with a picture of the same crossing taken from the east, so that the angel (anděl) mentioned in the article is visible. The tram and the annoying shadow remained ;-) JanSuchy 21:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Charles Schwab Corporation

message: I have replaced the section on Founder Political Activities because the actions of the founder and current chairman are relevant, and must be included in any article on the company. The removal of this section has the appearance of a paid "scrub" of the article by the company. The basis of the section is a well-researched article, which I referenced, in a major multiple pulitzer prize winning newspaper. I ask that this section and the basic information be left, and of course, that other contributors improve or add to it. 76.14.185.179 (talk) 23:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it because it's not germane to the article.  Many, many CEOs make these sorts of contributions yet their company pages do not include it, see for example Home Depot or Exxon or really any of the top Fortune 100 companies. 76.14.185.179 (talk) 23:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on Founder Political Activities
Talk:Grey College, Bloemfontein

message: "The current headmaster is Johan Volsteedt, the first headmaster also being an old boy of the school".  How could the first headmaster (presumably in 1855) also be an old boy? GrahamBould 13:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This must refer to an older edition of the article and has been resolved. - Raker 17:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: headmaster

message: The claim that this (Grey) is the third oldest school in the country is not true. The oldest is SACS (South African College Schools)(1829) followed by Wynberg Boys High School (1841) and Bishops (Diocesan College) (1849). St Andrew's College in Grahamstown and Grey College in Bloemfontein were both founded in 1855. This makes both Grey and St Andrew's the fifth oldest schools in the country. Grey High School in Port Elizabeth was subsequently founded in 1856.{unsigned}
:I have changed this claim to that it is one of the oldest schools in South Africa. Raker 17:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: oldest

message: Add rivals maritzburg College 41.115.29.159 (talk) 19:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  College 

message: Headmaster Adriaan Johannes Bresler 41.246.30.4 (talk) 10:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headmaster 1900 - 1920
Talk:Northside, Dublin

message: I'm going to re-add the so-called "POV" line about restaurants, as it's patently true. As an example, check the following page and see exactly how many restaurants have an odd number post code or are in north county Dublin:
http://www.adlib.ie/QuickGuide.asp?CN=DS&recid=1
Out of the first 160 restaurants, _1_ is on the Northside. I gave up at that stage, my point made.
P.--Paul Moloney 13:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can  two roads with different names be the same ,road. Glasnevin  doesnt extend past the start of collins ave  (Gnevin 17:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the dublin street guide issued by the osi , has the word whitehall printed on top of DCU  (Gnevin 17:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DCU 

message: I suggest  Dublin Airport  and the  Dublin Port Tunnel. 194.237.142.7 06:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other proposed notable places/things? 

message: Have places like Rush, Lusk and so forth (even Swords) reallz been thought of as Northside - always saw it as more north suburbs, really. 213.147.114.4 19:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Far north 

message: This is perhaps not the right article to startwith but I was wondering if anyone in the Irish Wikipedia could do small articles on former villages or "lost areas". I'm thinking of such as Censure, which used to be a small settlement off Carrackbrack Road out on the Howth Peninsula, Feltrim, once a respectable little village south opf Malahide and my favourite, Pass-if-you-can in north west Dublin. I am sure there are more and that's even without the southside, of which I know less. 213.33.157.190 12:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost localities 

message: The change made - without any discussion - does not make sense.  I'm sure it was made in good faith, but by someone who was not familiar with the topic.  It is "the Northside" - and not "Northside Dublin"!  Unless anyone objects, I propose to reverse it (and Southside Dublin too).  Northside (Dublin) covered well the correct usage, and the fact that this is Dublin's "Northside", as other cities have such also. SeoR (talk) 10:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, agree completely. Hohenloh  +   23:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of article name
Talk:2006 Lebanon War

message: The article has a grammatical error under the section "Aftermath" in the subsection "Prisoner swap". In this paragraph is the following sentence: Until that time, Hezbollah had provide no information on Goldwasser and Regev's condition and disallowed the Red Cross from visiting them. Using "provide" here is incorrect, but replacing it with "provided" should fix the issue. So somebody who can edit the page should do so. Thank you!
90.131.144.65 (talk) 09:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: RudolfRed (talk) 01:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar error 

message: As per topic, civilians runs on straight from military 89.125.113.69 (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualty and losses box missing some live breaks on Israel side 

message: In the sentence "attacked and destroyed 59 stationary medium-range Fajr rocket launchers", the word "Fajr" links to the prayer https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fajr_prayer.
It ought to link to the weapon https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fajr-5.
I'd edit it myself, but I don't have permission. Warsage (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fajr" should link to the weapon, not the prayer 

message: In the Media coverage section, there's a section where Lars Adaktusson is used a source with him only being described as a journalist. Adaktusson is in fact the current chairman of the Sweden-Israel Friendship Association and was previously the chair of pro-Israel lobby organisation European Israel Public Affairs. I feel this information should be included if he is used as a source. Conspiracy Raven (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lars Adaktusson as a neutral source 

message: Ceasefire was August 14, but the war officially ended on September 8 just saying that info box should include that.  Dilbaggg (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  End date
Talk:Seven Swords

message: Just to note: someone added this:
The movie is based on the Kurosawa's masterpiece "The Seven Samurai"
That is inaccurate because Liang Yusheng wrote the script, and it has been acknowledged that the film was based on one of his books. --mh 13:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Seven Samurai

message: Unlike most wuxia movies Seven Swords makes little use of wire fu, as Tsui Hark claimed he wanted to bring the wuxia genre more down to earth.  Nevertheless, there is still much martial arts action as choreographed by acclaimed action director Lau Kar-Leung (Drunken Master II).
I removed this paragraph because it doesn't seem true. While the wire fu in this film is much less vertical than contemporary wuxia (no jumping over trees here), it still uses extensive amounts of wire choreography for various fantastical acrobatics, even more than House of Flying Daggers or Hero. Therefore I think it is disingenuous to claim that the movie has a notable reduction in wire fu, or is any more down to earth than its peers. VanishingUser 13:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wire fu 

message: Under the 'Release' section I would also like to add some more information: the first cut was actually over four hours after which Tsui Hark suggested to make the movie into two parts by shooting additional scenes, modify already existing scenes and then editing the first part to 90 minutes long with the rest made into a sequel. Tsui Hark tried convincing people of this idea but he was told the contract with the buyer only allows him one full feature length film from beginning to end, so after additional cutting the current version was finally released as one film. (Blade0817 (talk) 03:48, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final cut 
Talk:WBMM

message: Yes, the FCC's database entry for this station is scrambled. It really does broadcast on channel 22. --AlexDW 13:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Kerbside collection

message: Does anyone know the first place in the world to do this? 146.169.49.35 12:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: first

message: This page should use the American spelling. Curbside with a K is unfamiliar and foreign to many wikipedians.--Pawn0 o (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kerbside -> Curbside 
Talk:Materials recovery facility

message: I appreciate this article. I've always been interested in how the "dirty" MRFs go about separating the incoming materials. Despite all I've read about sophisticated machines that automate the process, most people in the business I've talked to say that the majority of the work is done by workers pulling material off conveyors. I'd like to see this article expanded with more information about "dirty" MRFs, especially comparing a state of the art facility with the less modern ones, and descriptions with pictures of the flow process.
Ibjoe 01:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info ?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Techno Source (2nd nomination)

message: "This version of Sudoku is much more convenient and handy, since it is a hand-held electronic version which eliminates the need of messy erasing on paper."
*head bangs desk* Oh dear... as ane fule kno, Sudoku puzzles do not at any point need to be solved by trial and error. In a properly-designed puzzle there will always be at least one move which is unambiguously correct, and you should never need to go back and do "messy erasing". Of course, you can pick numbers at random if you get stuck, but that means you're rubbish and should probably go back to the wordsearches in Soap Weekly.
Clearly this source doesn't know what it's talking about and is therefore not reliable. 
Yes, I'm joking.
--Sam Unamupure 13:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The About.com source
Talk:Mechanical heat treatment

message: --Alex 13:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Windrow composting

message: It seems to me that this article is too short to merit being kept separate from the compost windrow turner article and they could be easily combined and a redirect put in place. Plymouths 19:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree that it's a bit short, however I would suggest the real issue is it needs expansion or attention from an expert. This article should be more detailed than the windrow turner article.--Alex 08:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd vote for a merge, with windrow composting, without which it is really meaningless Red58bill (talk) 02:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: Hi, the last external link is a link to a manufacturer.
Wikipedia is no advertising platform, either remove this item or make a list with more manufacturers.
I don't know enough to complete a list and therefore recommend deletion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.97.102.230 (talk) 12:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement
Talk:Hagfish (band)

message: As suggested, I have rewitten this article from scratch. please see temp page for new version of article without copyrighted material. Please rembmer that the notability of this article is still valid as this is a published band that still plays.
<P><P>
<I>I'm sorry, but you've failed to establish notability for this band, have failed to write from a neutral point of view ('wonderfully obnoxious'), have violated copyright by copy/pasting text directly from allmusic.com, and have removed a boiler placed by another editor, without explaining why. I'm afraid I'm going to have to nominate this article for deletion if you do not address these points. For now, I'll re-add the notability boiler, and add a few more. -- Ec5618 06:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beretta 92 Centurion

message: This (and other Beretta 92 variants) should never have been a separate page (from Beretta 92) as it is only a variant of the 92 that should be covered in a "variants" section as is the standard for all firearm/weapon pages.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
Deon Steyn 13:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Beretta 92DS

message: This (and other Beretta 92 variants) should never have been a separate page (from Beretta 92) as it is only a variant of the 92 that should be covered in a "variants" section as is the standard for all firearm/weapon pages.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.
Deon Steyn 13:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bioaugmentation

message: Anybody interested in working on this article? --Robin-vst (talk) 18:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am. But it really hurts. -- Kku (talk) 14:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

text: I will be looking to edit to the introduction of this article through the Michigan State University Microbial Biotechnology Course (MMG 445).  I am going to be looking for a few reliable sources to cite.  I am looking to make the introduction a little more broad, yet more informative and detailed.  Sdunyak (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:One Hour in Wonderland

message: Ok, this article is just bad.  I'm going to remove all the text and leave some sort of a stub.  --Xyzzyplugh 13:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm too lazy to make it any better, I hate writing.  At least it makes some sense now.  --Xyzzyplugh 13:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled