lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:British royal titles templates

message: Hi all - wanting to start a more-than-me-and-Tasc discussion here!
So, some points for consideration and discussion:
*Colours: should the boxes have coloured title bars? What colours?
**My current proposal is a light red for English-born titles; blue for Scottish; purple for British
*Order: should titleholders be listed first-to-last, or last-to-first?
– DBD 12:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My personal feeling is that they should be ordered first-to-last (ie, the opposite of the current ordering), since that keeps all the dates going in the same direction.  I actually came to this talk page to see if there was any particular reason why they were in the current order. FiggyBee 00:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think First-to-last is a good suggestion for title holders. --Ashley Rovira 13:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 8, 2006

message: Hi and thanks for selecting this for the main page. I had thought of shortening the summary myself, and would have done so, had I known suggested size limitations for the main-page. This is what I had come up with, it includes more wikilinks from within the article (trying to match the existing intro):
----
The definition of Macedonia is a major source of confusion due to the overlapping use of the term to describe geographical, political and historical areas, languages and peoples. Ethnic groups inhabiting the area use different terminology for the same entity, or the same terminology for different entities. Geographically, no single definition of its borders or the names of its subdivisions is accepted by all scholars and ethnic groups. Demographically, it is mainly inhabited by four ethnic groups, three of which self-identify as Macedonians: One Slavic group does so at a national level, while another, Bulgarians, as well as a Greek one do so at a regional level. Linguistically, the names and origins of the languages and dialects spoken in the region are a source of controversy. Politically, the use of the name Macedonia has led to a diplomatic dispute between Greece and the Republic of Macedonia. Despite intervention from the United Nations, the dispute is still pending full resolution. (more...)</div>
Recently featured: Extrasolar planet – Mount Rushmore – Down syndrome 
----
NikoSilver 13:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would post this, but, other than the many redundant links to the article which I prefer to avoid, it's identical to the one already up. Raul654 18:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks. I thought we needed the links. No other modifs necessary. NikoSilver 18:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Radical Loving Care

message: I can't find any independent reviews of this book by appropriate publications, though my ability to search is limited to the web.  The best I can find appears to come from Columbus bizjournal and seems to be a reprint of quotes by Charles Lauer provided to the magazine, presumably by the publisher since there is no mention of the magazine interviewing Lauer or asking him to review it.  
A book that has influenced the methods of so many hospitals seems important, and the Amazon sales rank (around 100,000) seems high for a book with a presumably limited market. But the lack of independent information about the book is worrying and points to notability concerns.  Any ideas? --Siobhan Hansa 13:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews
Talk:Memory address register

message: * A register that points to a register that points to an address - this sounds a little bit too complicated. --Abdull 13:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: * Are SI and DI registers appropriate examples? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In [[x86]] processors 

message: * This article refers to the term "CPU" but does not seem to recognize or allow for the concept of multi-core and parallel computers as well as other any other types. It should probably be nominated as historical, and a new article created for the broadest concept of what a "computer" is (if this concept does not already exist in Wikipedia), as well as the known sub-concepts of this broadest concept of "computer". In fact, IMHO, this general process of starting with the broadest concept and creating sub-concepts (as separate Wikipedia articles) in a multi-level tree root type structure (or a network structure) should probably be used for at least most of the concepts explained in Wikipedia. Such consistently used structures would also allow AI to use Wikipedia much more effectively.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjalexand (talk • contribs) 16:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article out of date? / historical?
File talk:WeirdAlYankovic.jpg

message: Cropping is not derivative work, license remains cc-by. A.J. 13:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This is not al, in 2006 al was much thinner he was always thinner.
81.102.232.12 (talk) 18:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  not him
Talk:The Half Naked Truth

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Half-Naked Truth →  – The suggested new title for this page matches what appears on the screen in the opening credits for the film; that is, there is no hyphen between the words 'Half' and 'Naked'.  Additionally, the suggested title also matches the title for the film on its overview page of the TCM website. Observer1632 (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 April 2024
Talk:Al-Milal wa al-Nihal

message: It is true that the book is not about Sunni Islam, but it is written from a Sunni pov, and those are the articles in those categories. peace. --Striver 13:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know that it's written from a Sunni POV? --Bluerain talk 09:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is writen by Muhammad al-Shahrastani. --Striver 19:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

text: So he could not have written from a neutral POV? --Bluerain talk 06:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider that his article presents him as an Islamic scholar. --Striver 08:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Again, does that rule out the fact that he could write from a neutral POV? Alternatively, consider that his article also says the book is 'non-polemical'.  --Bluerain talk 10:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No its, not impossible, but its probable. The book is under the "Islamic literature" category and List of Sunni books is simply a list. How big is the probability that a 12th century religious book will be NPOV? 0?--Striver 15:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, he most definitely was not Shi'a. With NPOV i mean that i presume that the book states that God exists, that Muhammad was the prophet of God and avoided statements that would cause his contemporaries to accuse him of apostasy. --Striver 16:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: That is the whole point of NPOV. You don't see wikipedia state the existence of God as factual. If it would, it would be religious literature. Same with other issues, a encyclopedia that accepts basic tenets of Islam is a Islamic literature. --Striver 18:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: And btw, the burden of proof is on you if you want something to be included in the article, so till this issue is settled, I'm removing your additions. --Bluerain talk 07:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Please keep the "islam-book-stub" and "List of Sunni Books" and "Category of Islamic Books". All these are relevant here to jump start this stub and expand it. Almaqdisi talk to me 23:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Clough

message: Paul Clough is going to be a real star in the world of rugby league.
:"... is going to be ..." is WP:CRYSTAL, so if he isn't already then he is most def non-notable. Nashville Monkey 14:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: just repeating wiki-policy, nothing personal towards you. Nashville Monkey 15:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Hottie and the Nottie

message: Removed "It is rumored that shooting had to be stopped several times due to unexplained sightings of Jesus begging cast and crew to stop filming and for the taped footage to be destroyed." - I'm assuming it was vandalism, besides,I saw nothing on the Jesus page about this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.49.177.237 (talk) 09:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 
Talk:The Last Horror Film

message: In my attempt to confirm the 1983 nomination status, I turned to the website of the awards.  Per that information "best international Picture" was not a category in 1983.  There is no listed winner for Best supporting actress.  past winners of Saturn Awards --K3vin (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saturn Awards 

message: I sourced all items I considered subject to challenge and subsequently removed the ref template.  I am unsure how the protocol is on to establish notability.  Its a movie, in current video release, referenced in other articles, citing relevant key words.  It appears as the tags were added at the same time an article about the director of this film was created.  I cannot stress enough the frustration I feel with editors that feel they should know everything about everyone, and if they have not heard of something, it is somehow not important or notable.  I have faced this in other wiki sites, and am unsure that is the case here or not.  But I stand by this, I aimed to make the references a good balance bewteen easily verifiable, and authoritative.  I held back cross citing the entire cast and crew with TCM and the print book.  I stopped with three to make my point.  --K3vin (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and references 
Talk:Paradise Valley Mall

message: Doesn't exist anymore.
-Former mallrat  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.72.117 (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Knight Gallery 
Talk:St. Stephan, Mainz

message: The article is about > St. Stephan's Church, Mainz < with an a.  --Frans Fowler (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: How about St. Stephan, Mainz? It's a church building AND a parish. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. Done --Frans Fowler (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:MEncoder

message: MEncoder is largely unmaintaned at this point and is more or less an artifact of MPlayer development.  Does it really warrant its own article, or should it be mentioned as part of MPlayer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarcieri (talk • contribs) 23:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Both keep better seperated. mplayer is on tool. mencoder is another tool. it uses output of mplayer for converting by internal piping. Dieter 87.182.53.153 (talk) 19:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Support, hopeless stub with only one reference at the moment, it should be merged into MPlayer. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to MPlayer 

message: The common tasks section looks like it's an instruction manual, so would be better if moved to wikibooks in my view --h2g2bob 13:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and done --Monotonehell 14:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone should put a link to the wikibook entry, as the reader might not find it easy to get to the info otherwise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.15.208.98 (talk) 14:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did, it's right up at the top. --Monotonehell 01:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common Tasks - Better on Wikibooks? 

message: There's a lot of overlap between MEncoder and FFmpeg. Aren't they both use libavcodec? So how are they different, in fact? 88.153.236.136 13:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between MEncoder and FFmpeg? 

message: Hi 
Using FFmpeg and MEncoder for some codecs in US is illegal becouse they are patented. Please include in this article more about legal aspects.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.27.1.247 (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal Aspects 

message: Currently anyone looking up "MeGUI" will get redirected to "MEncoder", which is of course a completely different project with no shared history or components.
I can see absolutely no valid reasons for such a redirect to exist.
If you don't know either projects, compare their web pages and I am sure you will agree:
http://mewiki.project357.com/wiki/MeGUI
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/info.html
The redirect should be removed and MeGUI get an article of its own, as it is a piece of software of major importance for both external software development and common usage in some high impact video encoding communities.
83.233.47.96 (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a redirect to MEncoder for MeGUI?
Talk:Sumayya

message: I redid the whole thing which was, sad to say, a piece of junk.  DKleinecke (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: সুমাইয়া (রাঃ) প্রথম ৭ জনের মধ্যে একজন। তিনি একজন মহিলা এবং আরব অার্থ সামাজিক অবস্হানে নিম্নতম ছিলেন। নবী করিম সঃ একজন বিশ্বাসী আল আমিন নামে পরিচিত। তাঁহার কথা মিথ্যা নয়। ইহাই সুমাইয়া রাঃ এর বিশ্বাস। তাঁহার বিশ্বাস থেকে তিনি এক বিন্দু ও নড়েননি। তপ্ত রোধে বালির উপর বুকে পাথর দিয়ে শোয়াইয়া রাখা বা পানি ভরতি কুপে ডুবাইয়া রাখার পর ও আল্লাহ ও তাঁর রাসুলের অবিচল থেকে আবু জেহেলের খন্জরের আঘাতে তাঁর শাহাদাত বরণ হয়।
নবী মোহাম্মদ সঃ তাঁর ও তাঁর স্বামী ও সন্তানের জান্নাতবাসী হওয়া ও বেহেস্তে তাঁর সাথে তাদের স্বাক্ষাতের খবর তাঁর স্বামী ইয়াসির রাঃ কে সামনা সামনি নিজ মুখে দিয়েছেন।
বদরের যুদ্ধে আবু জেহেল কে হত্যা করার পর নবী করিম সঃ নিজ মুখে হযরত সমাইয়া রাঃ এর পুত্র আমর কে বলেন " Allah has killed your mother's killer' । 
  Shafiqur Mazumdar (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  সুমাইয়া (রাঃ) ইসলাম ধর্মের অগ্র নায়িকা।
Talk:Peter II, Duke of Bourbon

message: There are numerous references for Peter's death being Oct 8 including Wikipedia, however, I have seen some documentation that has it as Oct. 10.  
The Oct. 10 date seems to be prevalent with French web pages and royal genealogy databases.  There are not many but enough for me to continue to investigate. 
Daytrivia 14:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Charles, Count of Clermont, was the son of John II, not Pierre II. Pierre and Anne had only Suzanne. According to Matarasso, citing Jean Marie de La Mure (Histoire des ducs de Bourbon  et des comtes de Forez), Anne became pregnant in 1476, but "thereafter all is silence: there is no record of any birth, death, baptism or burial, only the stained glass figure of a boy commemorated twenty-five years later in the window of Moulins cathedral known as the 'vitrail des ducs'." This was followed by "a long count of childless years". Please cite the claim that Anne had a son who died either in 1489 or 1498.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.156.50 (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: above comment refers to this sentence on the article: "Peter's son Charles of Bourbon (1476-1498) died as an unmarried young man , so Peter was succeeded by his daughter Suzanne". I'll leave a note on frech wikipedia so they can correct their article. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles de Clermont
Talk:Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria

message: I suspect most of the content of this article were lifted out from the History Section of the English website of BBVA.  Sections "History", "Expansion" and "The Creation of BBVA" corresponds to the subpages of the same name in that section well. 
Of course, if this is under the permission from BBVA itself, I won't object. --Samuel Curtis-- TALK 14:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicion of Copyright Infringement 

message: The investigating magistrate Baltasar Garzón rather fanously investigated BBVA's involvement in money laundering a few years back. It's in the Garzon article, but not this one. It ought to be referenced here, which by itself would help make this something other than a PR piece. --Christofurio 20:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrate material on Judge Garzon 

message: Será BBVA,
I, being a portuguese residência would like to create an account in your bank. I work in a hotel at Vila Nova da cerveira since more thank 5 years. 
If it is possível to create an account in your bank, please advice me with your pré-requisitos and advantahes.
Thank you
Kapil Magar
kapilmagar@gmail.com 36.252.219.224 (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create an account as a foreigner
Talk:The Order of Things

message: The translator is????
Alan Sheridan. The 1970 Tavistock edition was republished by Routledge, still (for some reason) without mention of Sheridan's name.
http://alansheridanauthor.com/translation-philosphy.html95.147.188.112 (talk) 12:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know where Sartre's review can be found, where he allegedly attacked Foucault as "the last rampart of the bourgeoisie"? There is no citation given.
:I see this has been cited in the article but Sartre's original review of The Order of Thigns is from L'Arc no. 30, Oct. 1966, pp. 87-88.--Ducio1234 (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sartre Review 

message: Perhaps the article would benefit from a more in-depth discussion? In the least, I think it would be interesting to give an analysis of the three epistémês that figure in Foucault's work and the underlying principle of them all. It would also be good to clarify the subtitle of the book and highlight themes like "the death of the subject" and the like. Finally, it could be good to include a section on Foucault's influences, specially his connection with the Structuralist movement of the time in particular his reading of Lacan and Lévi-Strauss. Other influences include Canguilhem and Bachelard, who provided much of the "shape" for this history of ideas. Daniel Nagase 14:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More in-depth discussion? 

message: Foucault was not dealing with Renaissance in the book. He rarely was interested in values in his entire opus. I've removed the claim. --Lynxmb 09:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "Renaissance values" 

message: The external link at the bottom has moved on.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.2.94.162 (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Talk:Journey of Hope

message: I first saw this film back in 1996. After seeing it, I felt so much for the family that had just lost their son. I had to go to work afterwards as I worked 2nd shift so I had to contain myself as it wouldn't do for me to start sobbing right there in the middle of the dry-packaging department of the Pillsbury plant. 
About five years later, I saw the film in the foreign section of a video rental store and shared the info with the Erdemir sisters, friends of mine. I warned them to have a BIG box of Kleenex on hand. They did not believe me. They eagerly went out, rented it, and later told me how much the entire family cried over it. 
The movie is well done but I highly recommend that one watches a comedy following seeing Journey of Hope. 
--R3hall (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So heart-wrenching ! 

message: At the first scene we see a traditionel alevi-ceremony, even with the holy "Elif ANA" from the Pulyan village. I am also from Pazarcik.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.158.171 (talk) 23:04, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Village they was from is called: Pazarcik 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Journey of Hope (film) →  – Journey of Hope used to be an article about a charity event but has since been redirected to Pi Kappa Phi where it currently isn't even mentioned by name. A mention should probably be added but even then I don't think it's a primary topic over a film with its own article. Instead, the film should be the primary topic with a hatnote for the charity event. Lennart97 (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 December 2021
Category talk:Withdrawn drugs

message: Should this category include only drugs that made it to market and were subsequently withdrawn or should it also include drugs which development were ended during clinical trials?  If the scope should be narrow, which my thinking is it should be, should a new category be made to cover the 'terminated in development' category? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category scope
Talk:Azimi Daim

message: This is self-serving and promotional and not what Wikipedia is about.--AhmedFaizP (talk) 22:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quoting himself 
Talk:Mirex

message: The molecular formula says C10, but I count 8 carbons in that structure, looks like two cyclobutanes fused together, which is contrary to the synthesis description which describes it as a dimer of a cyclopentadiene. What gives?
--DinkY2K (talk) 06:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look closer at the structure, you will see two other carbon atoms on either side. Each of those carbons appears to be bonded dichloro. There are two cyclopentadiene rings within the structure. -Kpstewart (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

text: The two diagrams show different molecules. The lower, colour Ball-and-stick model appears correct to me (with 10 carbon atoms) but the upper, black and white diagram only has 8 carbon atoms drawn as the vertices of a cube. This caught my eye as I've not seen carbon atoms forming a square before. Tantrie (talk) 12:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure Diagram 

message: Using 'ironically' in the opening doesn't seem up to snuff.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.148.96.101 (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little out of tone.
Talk:Roman military decorations and punishments

message: The Hebrew interwiki deals only with decorations and not with punushments, but we decided to link here anyway, on th basis of "close enough". Daniel Tzvi 18:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki Note 

message: I didn't want to clutter the page with a label, but it's evident that there must be sources used to compile this article other than Polybius — secondary sources, perhaps?
I like how it's set up with decorations and punishments together, and I'm not objecting to any of the content. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations?
Talk:Bread and Chocolate

message: This page really needs to be rewritten. It's not an encyclopedia entry, it's just a simple essay. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.159.132 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 8 June 2007
:Plot summary done. Mariokempes 21:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled