lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Contact Consequences

message: As a member of the cleanup taskforce, I have greatly changed this article from the version that many users first voted on.  I encourage everyone to take another look. Canderson7 23:25, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Please take another look

message: Could I urge you to review the other articles on this subject, including Abduction Phenomenon, First contact (science fiction) and unidentified flying object.  Thanks. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 10:11, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before you start... 

message: *Sorry, no hoax This article is intended to address the concearns that people may have, should NASA find something, say on Mars or Europa, aliens find this planet.  It depicts both any positive and negative effects of alien contact, such as aliens helping Earth's doctors eradicating Cancer, AIDS,Bird Flu and/or aliens having humanity over for mealtimes - their mealtimes , meaning we're their food source, just as plants and animals are our food sources.Martial Law 04:56, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for all who have helped the article along. What it needs most is sources.  Personal essays are not allowed, we must simply summarize verifiable sources. Rather than debating issues here, interested editors might better spend their time improving the article. Even if it's merged elsewhere, the information can accrete. However without some sources it isn't verifiable information. -Willmcw 10:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion moved from vote page 

message: This debate will be affected by a catastophic malfunction on the Wikipedia site. A critical
program on this site has fatally malfunctioned. Repairs are underway. Time on this debate will have
to be extended due to this fatal malfunction. Contact your Admin.s for more info.Martial Law 23:53, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortunately, since this page hasn't already been affected by the HTML Tidy problem it won't be.  An extension of the debate will not be necessary . Canderson7 23:59, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Valiant effort, though. Points for the attempt.  RasputinAXP  T C 00:11, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Good call.  Although this page was fine, the article was messed up. It's fixed now. Canderson7 00:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

text: All you need to do now is come up with some credible reasons. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 09:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALERT !! SITE MALFUNCTION !! ALERT !!
Talk:Flooring

message: I see carpet, ceramic tiles etc as floor coverings.  They would be nothing without the underlying flooring, i.e. timber boards, concrete, rammed earth etc.  We are back to the old different names used in different regions, I am speaking as a builder with a UK and Australian background. billbeee 18:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flooring V Floor covering

message: The subject of Flooring is already dealt with in Floor covering and all that really remains is a definition of 'Flooring'. I think Flooring should probably be redirected to Floor and a bit put under Floor covering. Dmcq 14:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly remove article? 

message: The result was merge into Floor. -- Dmcq (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about making both Flooring and Floor Covering subheadings under Floor?  Flooring and Floor Covering would also redirect to Floor.  In my experience Floor is a generic term which can subsume many different structural and finish issues.  Flooring usually refers to hard-surfaced finishes that are permanently installed.  Floor covering more often refers to rugs, carpets, or other soft-surfaced finishes, particularly when they are movable.  Maybe I'm saying the same thing you are.Newell Post (talk) 02:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right. I'm too timorous and they say to be bold. I'll add floor to the proposed merger as the one to merge into. Dmcq (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Well I've reversed the merge as I think the material is in a fit state for a separate article and there are many references to flooring and not floor. I think this will allow space for the two articles to go their own ways, floor perhaps to be more an overview and talk about standards and engineering whereas flooring is more consumer oriented. Dmcq (talk) 17:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversed the merge
Talk:Tony Miles

message: Tony Miles did indeed suffer bouts of mental illness.  Punching Sam Sloan is, however, a sign of mental health.  Reference to Forrest Gump wannabe deleted.  Billbrock 23:37, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This event seems to have gone from the article, although it's mentioned this this article at the Daily Telegraph, written shortly after his death. "By 1986, most regarded Short as Britain's best player, but Miles was a team selector and Short was chosen as number three board - with Miles at board one - at the Dubai Chess Olympiad. A journalist who questioned this judgment in print was punched in the face by Miles for his pains." -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: The original quotation from Miles was (in German) ‘eine Arte Monster mit hundert Augen’ (a kind of monster with a hundred eyes). See https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/kasparovmiles.html.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Better Read Than Dead (talk • contribs) 06:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kasparov's Eyes
Talk:Terminal Tower

message: I've replaced the fair use images with free ones from the Historic American Buildings Survey collection. More images can be found here. - EurekaLott 21:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As much as I like the new images, I still say we should at least keep the old construction workers photograph for historical purposes. -- Clevelander 22:02, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm confused. If you like it, why did you remove the picture of the lobby? - EurekaLott 22:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked the image that you added of the tower from downtown, but I felt that the lobby image wasn't as significant as the construction workers image.  So, I replaced it.  Sorry if I caused any confusion, I restored it anyway, so there's nothing to worry about. -- Clevelander 22:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an black and white image that shows the whole tower from the ground view. -- Gallagm2 (talk) 01:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I believe that as of 1953, the tallest building outside of New York City would be the main building of the Moscow State University (240 meters).67.160.19.213 (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're both right. I've updated the article with the correct information. - Eureka Lott 20:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tallest?

message: Why is it named the Terminal Tower?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.58.61 (talk) 23:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A train station (or terminal) ran underneath it.THD3 (talk) 19:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Terminal? 

message: The information box shows the roof height as 216 m (709 ft). However, three out of four of the cited sources list the height as 708 ft. I think this might be a rounding issue between feet and meters. The CTBUH Skyscraper Center (source #1) lists the height as 215.8 m / 708 ft. Bunkyray5 (talk) 01:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roof height 708 feet or 709 feet? 

message: Basic information to add to this article: Terminal Tower is one of the most recognizable symbols of Cleveland, Ohio, and it is often lit up at night in symbolic ways (including, currently, blue and yellow in solidarity with the nation of Ukraine during the 2022 invasion by the Russian military). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworded, but . Cards84664 02:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: There are many great photos of the tower lit up in various ways, perhaps a gallery of it lit up would be a nice addition? 2600:8806:9081:9F00:FD5B:BCD:85FF:ED41 (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery of tower lit up?
Talk:Easy CD Creator

message: When Roxio EZ CD creator saves a project (meaning a list of files you plan to burn to a CD that you aren't finished adding to yet) what format/3-letter-extension is it? (I'm on a different computer trying to help somebody else finding a saved project ... and I hoped Wikipedia might have the answer to that question, but alas it does not) Please add this info to the article! --Nerd42 15:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  File format?
Talk:Surfboard

message: That is why it needs more of an identification than that.
Like: Which continent is it in? Or at least which country.50.205.142.50 (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted it entirely, there was no support for it and the contributor claimed it was their grandfather and has no other linked contributions. Zbeso (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most readers have no idea where "Wilcove, Torpoint" is! 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Speeedfins. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 8#Speeedfins until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Speeedfins" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Adopted later by World Champion Mark Richards, and although otherwise it was a "flash in the pan" as far as trends go, for a few years in the mid to late 70s Stingers dominated surfboard design and were all the rage, either with or without Ben's 'trademark' step-bottom employed crosswise from stinger to stinger. I am surprised that this information has been omitted, as anyone who was actively surfing in the late 70s would've been no doubt been duly influenced. Wokepedian (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ben Aipa's Stinger
Talk:Perl/Archive 1

message: "===Regular Expressions with Perl Examples===" is used in a novel way in this article.  I'd have reserved that markup for section headings. --Bevo 03:20, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regular Expressions with Perl Examples 

message: I am removing a link to a list of Web hosting advertisements ("Webmaster.org: Perl Web Hosting Plans- List of companies offering perl in their web hosting plans.")
added to External links by 69.158.155.131 whose every single edit was adding links to similar lists in other articles. --Rafał Pocztarski 09:41, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web hosting advertisements 

message: The second and third paragraphs of the Overview section are quoted from perlintro(1).
They used to be indented with the blockquote markup; a little while ago someone changed the blockquote to colon (:).
However, neither blockquote nor colon works with TOCleft: the paragraphs are not indented. As a result, the reader can't tell how much text is being quoted from perlintro(1).
Wiki renders blockquote/colon as
  your quote here
The problem manifests in both IE and Firefox,
so it probably needs to be regarded as a bug in the Wiki software.
We need to do something about this, but I don't know what. --Swmcd 12:28, 2005 August 7 (UTC)
:This is a well-known problem of CSS, not a bug of mediawiki, FF or IE. What happens is that float boxes (the TOC in this case) don't push aside block-level boxes that are next to them (the dd/dl in this case), but only the inline-boxes (the text) inside them. The dd and dl boxes (and any margins they have) still extend all the way to the left edge of the content area, going "behind" the floating TOC. The same problem occurs if you put bullet lists beside a float, the bullets will often disappear behind the floating box.
:This is the behaviour the CSS standard mandates, and there aren't workarounds for it that are really satisfactory. If it's important to make clear what part of that paragraph is quoted, it will have to be italicized or something like that. --K. Sperling (talk) 13:46, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  TOCleft and indented paragraphs 

message: Since Perl 6 is now quite well-advanced as both a language definition and implementation, with both Parrot and PUGS based implementations, I think that Perl 6 should be mentioned prominently near the top of the article.  Perl 6 is likely to transform the language and widen its application (or destroy its chances, depending on your viewpoint!) so it deserves more coverage and linking to Perl 6.  I suggest a short mention linking to Perl 6 in Language Features and a similar mention linking to Perl 6, Parrot virtual machine and PUGS in Implementation.  --Richard Donkin 11:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perl 6 

message: This page needs history pages, it's quite long now. --Anon.
:... Ah, never mind, I'll do it myself. --Maru  (talk) Contribs 20:27, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
Talk:Jakalope

message: I restored the link to the fansite JakalopeFan.com. Of the two fansites listed, it is the active one, and the one in the English language, therefore most suited to inclusion on the English Wikipedia. If there's a reason I've missed for non inclusion of this fansite in the external links, please say so here. Entropicraven 16:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Unsigned3

message: If you are familiar with this template, please provide a synopsis of its use. Just the syntax would be fine. Folajimi 19:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Centrx→talk • 22:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You're right. *Checks*. whew, wasn't from my edit! But problem isn't too bad, I suppose. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 19:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Whether this template should always be substituted or not is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Template substitution#Unsigned and Unsigned2.  Your comment is invited. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 01:16, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. *Checks*. whew, wasn't from my edit! But problem isn't too bad, I suppose. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 19:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substitution
Talk:Fascism and ideology

message: The redirect Nazism and socialism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Nazism and socialism]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Nazism in relation to other concepts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Nazism in relation to other concepts]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I invite IP 95.53.160.189 to discuss their preferred content here, after consulting Talk:Fascism/FAQ. Generalrelative (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do note that my edits were about what fascists said about their ideology, not about where it should be placed on a political spectrum. Using one quote from Mussolini to push a certain narrative while ignoring those quotes that contradict this narrative is censorship, not "upholding of consensus". 95.53.160.189 (talk) 19:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

text: I wouldn't support digging through primary documents to find what Mussolini has said about fascism. Honestly, inclusion of his comment on fascism being far-right is on shaky ground, citing one historian's self-published lectures. I don't doubt that Mussolini said any of it, but we should lean on reputably published secondary sources for picking out and analyzing chunks of primary material. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed content
Talk:Macedonians (ethnic group)/Archive 5

message: Please review the policy pages on personal remarks and attacks (Wikipedia:No personal attacks). I suggest that we all avoid saying things like:
*Agreeing with yourself
*Enjoying this abuse
*You know it
I'm not deleting, merely "marking up" with HTML strikeout. Uncle Ed 14:47, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in such heated disputes where there is a clash of POVs it is inevitable that people will make personal attacks. MATIA, Bomac, I, everyone has made at some point a personal attack. I for one an willing to try and quit (yet another indication of my good faith). I am pleased with the articles as it is now. If we apply the MATIA principle, it appears even more perfect as it is not labelling people against their will. I'm sure that MATIA agrees with me :-)))))) REX 15:04, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a man of honour. What I wanted for Arvanites is the same with what I wish for that article. And some of the facts, are the agreed facts of the poll. +MATIA  ☎ 22:09, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lie: you want to name these people against their will. Also, that Poll was a tie, there are no agreed facts. REX 23:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Soy un hombre muy honrado: Talk:Macedonian_Slavs/Naming. +MATIA  ☎ 00:05, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then start acting like one... Macedonian 05:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: MATIA, you do realise that to say that you are a man of honour, you will have had to behaved like one. Have you? Nah! REX 11:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks]]
Template talk:Unsigned templates

message: * 
This template is intended to easily show all of the different  templates. It is on the talk pages on the three main templates used to sign a comment by a user who has forgotten to sign their post (templates unsigned, unsigned2, and unsigned3). If and when a new  template is created, it should be added on to this template and have this put onto its talk page. --Blackcap | talk 00:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted it today since unsigned2 now covers its functionality. --  ( drini's page ☎ ) 22:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:TNT N.V.

message: Anybody know what TNT stands for? I'm guessing it's something Dutch.--Santahul (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thomas Nationwide Transport.  It started in Australia.  -- Zsero (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNT 

message: Is it possible to mail a package from TNT to a country other than the 8 European ones they deliver to directly?  I seem to remember seeing their logo on packages delivered in the U.S. by a different carrier. -- Beland (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global delivery mechanism 

message: TNT seems to be mentioned by some scammers, who propose using it as an escrow service (which it is not) - maybe put something about that in the article? --Badger151 (talk) 22:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNT shipping scam 

message: is this section needed - due to the fact that it does not consern at all TNT on a global level and is on on hand only related to a division and than in UK  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.110.224 (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I do not think it is. Because 1. the mail was unregistered. 2. it is normal to have any postal company to lose a small fraction of unregistered mail. 3. as the summary stated, the mail may not even have been sent via tnt. Andries (talk) 08:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 UK child benefit data scandal 

message: I propose that Koninklijke TNT Post be merged into TNT N.V.. I think that the content in the Koninklijke TNT Post article can easily be explained in the context of TNT N.V., and the TNT N.V. article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Koninklijke TNT Post will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: comment I think it's more clear for the readers. Now there are different articles about the same TNT company: TNT Express, TNT N.V., Koninklijke TNT Post. See for example the Dutch article, wich is more clear: :nl:TNT N.V. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs

message: I think an article should be written on United Nations General Assembly decision 33/426 (1978) which was approved on December 18 of that year. This is a document which mandates the establishment of a UN organization to coordinate UFO and extraterrestrial information and research from member countries. An initiative was made in 2008 with the UN Secretary General to effect this decision which has laid dormant since 1978. This can also been seen in context of exopolitics movement for which we used to have a separate article. (see Talk:Exopolitics). __meco (talk) 16:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Nations General Assembly decision 33/426 (1978) 

message: See #Space Ambassador appointment above. Apokrif (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article categorized in [[:Category:Extraterrestrial life]]?
Talk:Conflict of tort laws

message: This page is part of a general campaign to improve the coverage of Conflict on the Wiki. Although somewhat specialised, I hope that readers will respect the expertise represented in this and the other pages and only make alterations if they have an interest or expertise in the subject. David91 01:15, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Generally

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Contract (conflict) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 20:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Jeff Stryker

message: Does this guy have family, girlfriend, wives what?  I heard a lot of dibble about uncited sources and that seems to have struck out all of this information.  --24.177.88.53 (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  personal life 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Bonners Ferry, Idaho

message: There is a reference here to a Boundary Commission which is presumably not the UK one described in the article of that name? --Red King 01:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: In my humble opinion...One of THE most boring places to live in..Unless you enjoy hunting..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.193.116.221 (talk) 05:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion