lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wildlife disease

message: Please see the Guide to writing better articles.  --Malcolmxl5 09:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Style of article

message: I believe this article and Zoonosis are talking about the same thing. I suggest that we merge the content. Manum56 (talk) 10:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: While the article is currently slanted towards zoonoses, and utterly fails to clearly define wildlife disease, the two topics are distinct but related: zoonoses are a subset of wildlife diseases that cross over into human health. Many wildlife diseases do not infect humans (e.g. rinderpest, chytridiomycosis), and there are journals and societies dedicated to Wildlife Diseases. While some content here might be used to supplement zoonosis (properly cited of course), this article needs a rewrite including a general introduction, less anthropocentricism, more global perspective, and more sources. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest merging with [[zoonosis]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mrj0037 (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Disease Ecology 6200

message: — Assignment last updated by Otter246 (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Biology
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Pats1

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See Pats1's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 20:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request
Talk:Royal College of Emergency Medicine

message: I have found an interesting article in the BMJ 1997 discussing the symbols and design of the coat of arms of the Royal College. Would this be worth including in the history section? Section in article is titled 'How to acquire a coat of arms.'
92.29.20.92 (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion on the coat of arms?
Talk:Loudonville, Ohio

message: I am responding to a request (diff) for a third opinion:# Loudonville, Ohio, listing of notable residents: how should Mr. Kettering be listed? One editor prefers to include his full name and a nickname (Charles Franklin "Boss" Kettering), while the other thinks it stylistically better to go simply with the article's current name (Charles F. Kettering). 06:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third opinion on notable residents 

message: Does the license plate need to be blurred? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dralezero (talk • contribs) 05:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  License plate in picture 
Talk:Vernon Brown

message: Why does this disambiguation page even exist? Only one has an article.  Of the three redlinks, only one of them has any incoming links to the disambiguation page (two of them for the trombonist), and the other two don't have any incoming links.  But there are two other incoming links to two different Vernon Browns not mentioned on the disambiguation page.  Gene Nygaard 20:46, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your logic is impeccable, but the only blue-linked guy on this DAB page, the former KELO-TV reporter, has a very short article. The only alternative I can think of is to delete the DAB, and make the TV guy be *THE* Vernon Brown. Then we would have no mention of the currently red-linked guys. Is that would you would like to do?  I suspect that the executed criminal may be found notable at some point. Google for 'Vernon Brown guilty Missouri' and you get 199,000 hits, while 'vernon brown kelo-tv' is 160 hits. EdJohnston 19:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why bother
Talk:Fellowship of the College of Emergency Medicine

message: এফ আর সি ই এম ডিগ্রী এর সম্প্রসারিত নাম  ফেলাশিপ অব দি রয়্যাল কলেজ  অব ইমারজেন্সী মেডিসিন। 
যুক্তরাজ্য ও রিপাবলিক অব আয়্যারল্যান্ড  এর বিশেষজ্ঞ ডাক্তারবৃন্দ এ ডিগ্রীর পরীক্ষা গ্রহণ করেন। যাঁরা পরীক্ষায় পাশ করেন তাঁরা রয়্যাল কলেজ অব ইমারজেন্সী মেডিসিন এর ফেলো ডিগ্রী প্রাপ্ত হন এবং নামের সাথে এফ আর সি ই এম লিখতে পারেন।
পরীক্ষায় অংশ গ্রহনের যোগ্যতা :
১।    অবশ্যই মেডিকেল ডিগ্রী থাকতে হবে।
২।   কর্মক্ষেত্রের  স্পেসালিষ্ট রেজিস্ট্রার রোটেশনে  ৫ বছর সেবা প্রদানের মধ্যে  ৪ বছর  ইমারজেন্সী মেডিসিন এ সেবা প্রদান করতে হবে।
পরীক্ষার পাঠ্য বা বিবেচ্য বিষয়: 
১।   ক্লিনিকেল বিষয়ের উপর ৫০% নম্বর থাকে।  ইহাকে  ক্লিনিক্যাল বিষয়ে  সংক্ষিপ্ত ( Short) /এস এ কিউ প্রশ্নের উত্তর পত্র ও  ক্লিনিক্যাল বিষয়ে গঠনমূলক (Objective) প্রশ্নের উত্তর পত্র এই দুই ভাগে ভাগ করা হয়।
২।    রোগ  ও রোগী ব্যবস্হাপনা  ও বিষয়ে ২৫% নম্বর থাকে।
৩।   বাকী ২৫% ক্লিনিক্যাল বিষয়ে শিক্ষামূলক থাকে। ইহাকে সমান দুই ভাগে ক্লিনিক্যাল  টপিক রিভিউ ( সি টি আর) চলমান মেডিকেল লিটারেচার ( Literature) এর লিখিত বিষয়ের ক্রিটিক্যাল মূল্যায়ন পদ্ধতির মাধ্যমপ কর হয়। 
এই  উভয় বিষয়ের টপিক ও লিটারেচার রেনডোমাইজ্ড নিয়ন্ত্রণ মূলক ট্রায়াল, পদ্ধতিগত রিভিউ  বা ডায়োগনেষ্টিক পেপার এর অন্তর্ভূক্ত হয়।
পরীক্ষার সময় : বছরে দুইবার।   সকল পরীক্ষার ১ মাস আগে  এস এ  কিউ পরীক্ষা নেয়া হয়।
একজন বাংলাদেশীর জন্য পরীক্ষা জটিল ও ব্যয় সাধ্য।  মেডিকেল সেবা যারা দেয় তারা ৩য় বিশ্বের দেশে অনেক বেশী প্রতিকূল অবস্হানে থেকে চিকিৎসা সেবা দেন। তাঁদের পিতা মাতা সন্তানের আর্থিক আনুকূল্যতা খুব একটা পাননা।  বেসরকারী প্রতিষ্ঠানে চাকুরী করে পরিবারের ভরণ পোষণ ও উচ্চতর ডিগ্রীর ব্যয় নির্বাহ এবং লেখাপড়ার সময় বের করা তাদের জন্য খুব কষ্টসাধ্য হয়। এতে সন্তানের পিতামাতা কষ্ট পাননা কিন্তু কষ্ট পান যখন তথাকথিত সংবাদকর্মী অশিক্ষিত জনগনের সাথে সূর মিলিয়ে কোন দূর্ঘটনার কারণ উদঘাটন হওয়ার আগে কমন জেনডারে ডাক্তারকে কষাই বলে  ডাকে। পিতা মাতা কষাইগিরী ( Butchering) করার জন্য এ ব্যয় বহুল বাস্তব বিজ্ঞান শিক্ষা দেওয়ায়না।
 
 Shafiqur Mazumdar (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  এফ আর সি ই এম ডিগ্রী
Talk:Heroic measure

message: Does involuntary hospitalization of suicidal patients count? It's a dangerous practice(there are sources on, for example, greatly increased suicide risk[1][2][3] to potentially support this) but used when the patient is expected to die without it. Especially next to CPR's bruised and broken ribs setting the bar fairly low, it seems to fit the definition in the lede. 66.190.13.201 (talk) 23:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychiatric medicine? 

message: — Assignment last updated by 23W1k1UCSF (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II

message: After reading through this article, it seems that further information is required to more accurately describe what heroic measures are. Therefore, the following suggestions are provided to create a more comprehensive page for users to understand "heroic measures":
* Background Information - when and where was the term "heroic measures" coined?
* Additional Examples of instances that would be considered "Heroic Measures" - include examples within multiple different fields/medical specialties (ex: Pediatrics, Geriatrics, etc.)
Keyapatel11 (talk) 22:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Information Necessary  

message: Peer review done by Group Obturator Hernia Jt2524 (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Children's Book Council of Australia

message: I can only assume that the reason why a section of award winners has been added to this page is due to the ambiguous linking to the awards pages.  I will therefore remove the new section and link to the awards pages in a more obvious manner. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 04:04, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards listing  
Talk:Obstetrical bleeding

message: AdamSEOWorks (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

message: In this article it says "Other definitions of post partum bleeding are haemodynamic instability, drop of haemoglobin of more than 1 g %". Could some please fix the "1 g %' part is there's no citation for me to look at to find out what it actually means and I can't find a similar definition on UpToDate. PriceDL (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre unit 

message: My current plan is to update the headers accordingly while preserving the content that has already been added. I am in the process of performing a thorough literature search to provide updated information and images. I will respond to any peer review comments and will continue to update my working plan. KMRobertson (talk) 22:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be peer reviewing KMRobertson's edits to this page.
A xi (talk) 22:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Workplan for updates

message: * An image from the commons is needed on this page. 
* A section on mortality should be added toward the end of the article. This means that "The most frequent cause of maternal mortality worldwide is severe hemorrhage with 8.7 million cases occurring in 2015[1] and 83,000 of those events resulting in maternal death[2]. Between 2003 and 2009, hemorrhage accounted for 27.1% of all maternal deaths globally[3]" could be removed from the first paragraph potentially. 
* History or different interpretations of bleeding before, during, and after childbirth could be added if appropriate sources can be found.
* " If platelet counts drop less than 100,000 per microliter the patient will be at a severe risk for inability to clot during and after delivery.[22]" appears to be directed at doctors rather than a generalist audience. See this article for more on this topic.
Mgiulietti (talk) 17:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Update
Talk:Penetrating trauma

message: Some brainstormed ideas for how to improve the article:
*Infobox
*Image
**Showing cavitation injury maybe
*Sections on 
**head trauma
**chest trauma
***Pulmonary laceration
***Hemothorax?
***Sucking chest wound
***Pericardial tamponade
**abdominal trauma
*Treatment section
*Prognosis section?
I think this subject is too general to follow the section guideline for diseases at WP:MEDMOS.  delldot on a public computer talk 23:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dreams and aspirations

message: Do we really need an image on this page that's basically a close-up shot of the crotch of a three year old? 68.62.204.186 (talk) 22:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with changing the image, do you have any others in mind?  Have you looked on commons?  Alternately we could find freely licensed images online, e.g. from biomedcentral.  Let me know if you need any help.  delldot ∇. 01:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less inappropriate first image 

message: There's a lack of information about these projectiles in this article, or even which level of velocity they fall under. Mousenight (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding on Effects of Arrows and Bolts 

message: I've knocked the abrasion collar article into much better shape, but I'm not entirely certain that the subject actually needs an article of its own. There's also the question of the not-yet-created bullet wipe article, for which I've created a temporary redirect as a place-holder. It occurs to me that if content is going to be folded into any existing articles, certainly bullet wipe belongs on the gunshot wound page, but abrasion collars are also a phenomenon seen in other projectile wounds, so that may be reason enough to keep it separate rather than duplicating the content on both the GSW and this page. If any kind person wants to head over there and check it out, as well as the lists of completed and still to-do chores regarding the article, I'd be grateful for feedback and any comments or opinions on what to do with them. It's very late here and I need some sleep, so I'll be back later. Thanks! 
Cadar (talk) 01:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abrasion collar article extended (WIP)
Talk:Rapid sequence induction

message: I believe that the name of the article Rapid Sequence induction has to change to Rapid Sequence Intubation(RSI) (a term used in seminars such as ALS, ACLS, ATLS, PHTLS). Also paralytics such as succinylcholine (suxamethonium) and anestetics such as etomidate (useful in increased intracranial pressure) are not referred. 688dim (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Rapid sequence intubation is incorrect (and is erroneously used in some manuals and courses), as it is the induction of anaesthesia that is rapid sequence, not the intubation, which is secondary to the procedure, and performed at normal speed, and used to maintain a patent airway after RSI is complete.  Indeed, intubation is not necessary, and you could use an LMA or cric to maintain airway, neither of which is intubation. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 18:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  — Owain is correct.  The appropriate terminology is "rapid sequence induction"; the purpose is primarily airway management in which intubation is often but not always the method for securing a patent airway.  | pulmonological talk • contribs  21:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Induction vs intubation

message: Given that at the bottom of the article "cricoid pressure" is mentioned as being controversial, it should be discussed earlier in the article. Possibly under "Technique" section.
Regards, Captain n00dle\Talk 10:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cricoid pressure 

message: As all maneuvers, it has indications, contraindications and side effects. It may cause esophageal rupture and it may make tracheal intubation and mask ventilation difficult or impossible. Although many seminars and courses such as ALS (advanced life support of ERC) mention it, there is a debate on using it. See Sellick maneuver 688dim (talk) 19:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cricoid pressure, also called '''Sellick's maneuver''', is not always safe

message: I suggest that the articles Sellick maneuver and Sellick manoeuvre should be merged 688dim (talk) 20:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Definately need merging, and then moving to cricoid pressure, as per WP:MEDMOS guidelines on using scientific terms, not eponymous names. I will try and get to this later. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 09:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Sellick maneuver''' and '''Sellick manoeuvre''' (also known as '''Cricoid pressure''')
Talk:Trauma team

message: :At least in the US, anesthesia providers are rarely involved until a patient is in the operating room. The trauma team is a group of surgical and emergency physicians, with emergency physicians in charge of airway and surgery and emergency generally alternating as team leads. 69.140.86.49 (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not necessarily true. I've worked at two level I trauma centers at which it was standard for an anesthesiologist to handle airway management of major trauma cases in the ED.Akigawa (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome

message: Maybe somebody competent could review this article (and remove the definitely non-relevant personal story at the end) as it seems to be of rather dubious quality.
Thank you,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.191.94.64 (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV - Content 

message: doi:10.1111/jth.14192 JFW | T@lk 08:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guideline
Talk:Early goal-directed therapy

message: I for one feel the EGDT is deserving of it's own article, and should not be merged with critical care medicine.  EDGT is an important idea that is often discussed in medical settings, yes it falls under the category of critical care, but arguing to include it in the critical care article is like arguing that all antibiotics should be included in a single article.
Djkammer (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree it deserves its own article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This fairly recent article might be of use in improving the article.
*
- - MrBill3 (talk) 00:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested reference 

message: I find this paragraph somewhat confusing:
:Early goal-directed therapy is a more specific form of therapy used for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. This approach involves adjustments of cardiac preload, afterload, and contractility to balance oxygen delivery with an increased oxygen demand before surgery
Why is surgery mentioned in relation to sepsis and septic shock? Or is the second sentence unrelated to the first and does not refer to EGT used in sepsis? Also, why does the first sentence claim that EGT is "more specific" -- more specific than what? AxelBoldt (talk) 02:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points, read the sources and edit appropriately. I think "a specific" and eliminating "before surgery" are needed edits. - - MrBill3 (talk) 06:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgery in sepsis?
Talk:Hunt and Hess scale

message: This article contains everything you need to know about the Hunt and Hess scale, and that's wonderful.  However, it doesn't amount to very much information--arguably, not enough information to constitute an article. More importantly, this information is already contained in the Subarachnoid hemorrhage article, so it's redundant to have it here as well. If there are no objections, I'm going to replace this article with a redirect to Subarachnoid hemorrhage#Classification.--Jmjanzen (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed redirect 

message: (From the article) " Introduced in 1968, the Hunt and Hess scale is now used less frequently, and has largely been replaced by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies classification."
Maybe needs a citation...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.172.83 (talk) 08:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falling into disuse
Talk:Iwo Jima-class amphibious assault ship

message: Hi, If you take a look at Essex class aircraft carrier, you'll see that I've put a bit of work into documenting the role of those carriers in the US space program.  The Iwo Jimas also played a significant part -- if anyone wants to document this, then I think you'll find the references I cited helpful.
BTW, if anyone can find a reference for why these ships were used, please let me know -- that's the one thing I've been searching for.  (The anecdote is that the Essexes were chosen for their 4 independent shafts, but obviously that doesn't apply to the IJs.)  Cheers, — Johan the Ghost seance 15:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Program 

message: Making some editing to bring these U.S. Navy ships in line with SECNAVINST 5030.8 which covers hull classifications. There never was any such thing as a "Landing Platform, Helicopter" in the U.S. Navy register. LPH stands for "Amphibious Assault Ship" and is not and acronym. Per the Navy History and Heritage Command: "It is important to understand that hull number letter prefixes are not acronyms, and should not be carelessly treated as abbreviations of ship type classifications." --Jaiotu (talk) 06:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SECNAVINST 5030.8 

message: ok it states: "Aviation facilities - 25 helicopters or AV-8 Harriers". This is a little misleading. I think these ships only rarely operated the AV-8 Harriers. - and that was the Guam in 1972-1974. - if you go  the page for the individual ships multiple one state "20 CH-46 and 10 CH-53" Per N. Palmer ~1980 "the hanger deck can accommodate  19 CH-46 Sea Knights or 11 CH-53 Sea Stallions. - the flight deck could simultaneously launch up to 7 CH-46 or 4 CH-53 Same source picture of one in Honk Kong with 3 CH-53 and 10 CH-46 on deck.  Also usually slightly less and a few AH-1 Cobra and UH-1 Huey. Interesting Comparision - Pretty close in size to the Independence Class Light Aircraft Carriers (CVL) Wfoj3 (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aviation Support
Talk:Canal Fulton, Ohio

message: Canal Fulton surpasses the 5000 people threshold, and it should be considered a city. Dogblock (talk) 03:16, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of Canal Fulton
Talk:Stabilization (medicine)

message: http://www.armystudyguide.com/content/powerpoint/First_Aid_Presentations/prevent-shock-2.shtml
http://www.umm.edu/ency/article/000167trt.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EME44 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  link
Talk:Autotransplantation

message: Autologous seems to deal with exactly the same subject as Autotransplantation, just that the former has used the adjective and the latter has used the noun of the term. Everything could be put in Autotransplantation to be consistent with e.g. Allotransplantation and Xenotransplantation. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from autologous

message: Aren't most skin grafts autotransplantation?  I've been bold and added a stub section in the hope someone with the knowledge will expand it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.221.13.140 (talk) 08:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about skin grafts?
Talk:Heart–lung transplant

message: I removed unsourced survival statistics and replaced them with a sourced survival statistic. I was going to just flag it as needing citation, but it was a very extreme claim about survival rates, and had a citation on it for a page about survival rates for kidney transplants, but no supporting evidence for the claims about heart-lung transplant survival rates.
87.80.97.137 (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics edit 

message: I moved it from the hyphen to match what I found in the article text itself. Before doing so, I consulted User:Noetica by email. This is the relevant excerpt from his response:
Tony (talk) 07:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move: en dash
Talk:Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate

message: I've attempted to expand the references section of this article as well as provide an external link to a webpage which contains relevant information regarding distribution of HTK.  My changes have been deleted by overzealous editors.  They are relevant, informational and not promotional- they should be made available to all Wikipedia users.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212wikiupdate770 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.13213 JFW | T@lk 00:14, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: doi:10.1056/NEJMra1702693 JFW | T@lk 12:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEJM
Talk:Beach City, Ohio

message: Mayor JohnnyBGood67 (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed list of non-notable local politicans for a small town. Adds zero value. Canterbury Tail talk 14:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government
Talk:Aeromedical evacuation

message: the last two links in the references are broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.106.50 (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article uses abbreviations inconsistently: "AE" and "Air Evac"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BananaCarrot152 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Abbreviations 
Talk:Combat support hospital

message: Hi,
The main problem with this article is the jargon used in it, for instance:
*"opposition soldiers" (aka "enemy soldiers")
*"...produce surgical outcomes similar to that seen in fixed facility hospitals" (aka. "have a comparable mortality rate to hospitals")
...and many more.
Things like this both make the article unclear in places, as well as quite irritating to the reader, so it would be great if someone could fix 'em. Brigade Piron (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Go right ahead and WP:BB -- happy editing!--S. Rich (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: US Mil "Jargon"

message: Current list should include 405th CSH in West Hartford, CT  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.247.3.210 (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat Support Hospitals 

message: Good morning. Cleaning up page. 
-The CSH's are in the process of being reorganized to Field Hospitals (Smaller, modular units) so I made a few edits to reflect that. 
-Moved the 48th CSH to the 'Former CSH' list, as I was there when they cased the colors for the last time. I'll keep refining this page as I remember how to wiki. Thanks all. -Ljmarcum (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments