lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peeping Tom (Peeping Tom album)

message: Why are people deleting the reviews from somethingFM and HotRockPlanet? Michael Greiner 01:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: This article seems to be contradicting itself by calling Peeping Tom both, a solo collab album by Mike Patton, and an album by a band of the same name. Which is it, exactly? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ampc (talk • contribs) 00:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These things (like Liquid Tension Experiment, Ocean Machine, Explorers Club (band) etc are generally referred to as projects and the lineup may vary a bit and is usually a mixture of people from different bands. Not a band, though some may eventually become bands. (And "trip hop", my arse! But genre-enforcers are too aggressive force to be fought on wp.) blades 16:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've already made the band article Peeping Tom (band). Liquid Tension has a separate article as well as articles for each album. I'd say Peeping Tom is a band with only one fixed member, like Nine Inch Nails.Pwrong (talk) 04:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: marking this article for refimprove. So many direct quotes from living
people. Where the citations for this artistic advertisement
speak?  WP:NPOV and WP:COI seem to be possible tags as well but let's give editors
a
chance
to improve sources for a week or two and see what happens.  Spectre9 (talk) 05:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV and Citations
Talk:Coeluridae

message: I doln't have the paper in which Rauhut places Compsognathus, Mirischia, and Coelurus in the same family--however, there are a few issues. Very few paleontologists have adopted this usage of coeluridae, and I bet I know why. The name Compsognathidae predates the name Coeluridae! Any family that contains Compsognathus must be named Compsognathidae. Sereno discusses this on the TaxonSearch entry for Compsognathidae . The whole coelurid thing is a mess, and I'm going to go ahead and re-structure, with a separate page for Compsognathidae, which is pretty well supported compard to Coeluridae. Any discussion of this stuff can go here, I guess.Dinoguy2 23:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compsognathidae 

message: Aren't coelurids tyrannosauroids?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brisio (talk • contribs) 13:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They've fallen out in that position is one or two analyses (actually I'm not sure if these were published or just posted online) but the idea hasn't yet gained wide acceptance or been really highlighted in the literature. Dinoguy2 (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't coelurids tyrannosauroids?
Talk:Banished Rhythmic Hate

message: I found :Image:8809053130595.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:8809053130595.jpg]]

message: :Image:8809053130595.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:8809053130595.jpg
Talk:Barbed Wire Sandwich

message: The article says it is psychedelic rock, as well as blues rock. What aspects of the album are psychedelic rock? Nurg (talk) 00:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The mention has been removed. Nurg (talk) 08:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychedelic rock?
Talk:Northern Electric

message: Leaving the page empty will allow someone to write an article for 'Northern Electric', a UK company. (RM21 22:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So does leaving this page as a redirect. It does not satisfy any speedy deletion criteria. Kusma (討論) 23:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Inductively coupled plasma

message: I want to take issue with the last paragraph:
"Another benefit of ICP discharges is that they are relatively free of contamination because the electrodes are completely outside the reaction chamber. In a capacitively coupled plasma (CCP), in contrast, the electrodes are placed inside the reactor and are thus exposed to the plasma and subsequent reactive chemical species."
It implies that CCPs cannot be created by external antennas (when the challenge of creating an ICP is often keeping it from being capactively coupled) and also ignores one of the crucial reasons why ICPs can be cleaner than CCPs:  the lower plasma potential of ICPs results in a smaller sheath potential which causes less sputtering.  
But I've never really posted to wikipedia and only have a bachelors so it would be nice to be backed up on this.  Maybe I'll get the guts to change it on my own if I come back and no one has said anything after a while.
Pwbrenne 22:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It said 1015cm-3, this made no sense, but 1015cm3 appears more appropriate.
--Hhash (talk) 04:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was correct as it was with electron density in electrons/volume, in this case electrons per cubic centimeter and units of cm-3. --Kkmurray (talk) 04:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Electron density
Talk:Dragoslav Jevrić

message: Is anyone aware of Jevrić's ethnic affiliation? He may be from Montenegro, but a third of Montenegrins identify ethnically as Serbs according to the latest census, and the Berane municipality from which he hails has a Serb plurality. If that were the case, this could be said to be Serbia's first World Cup appearance, as the Serbia and Montenegro national football team would in fact be made up entirely of Serbs. :)--211.28.181.102 23:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America/Newsletter

message: Do you want to use the structure that The Beatles project uses?  It has a fair bit of subpage nesting to handle creating more than one newsletter Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter... Whether or not you do, do you want to use that template as a starting point for hand mods?  Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Template (then subst it where you want it) I'm glad to help with technical issues or formatting (but not content...) or delivery. ++Lar: t/c 23:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Wow... feels like looking at a blank piece of paper, trying to start a novel. --Aaron Walden  05:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to start 

message: The July newsletter went well. I guess we'll just start posting articles for the next one to the Newsletter page as time permits? --Aaron Walden  20:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  August Newsletter 

message: If you are interested in adding to the upcoming edition of the newsletter, you can work on it on this rough draft page.--Aaron Walden  09:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in Progress
Talk:Barrett (album)

message: On all issues of the album prior to the Crazy Diamond box set, the production credit for Barrett clearly reads "produced by David Gilmour and Richard Wright".  Only on the most recent reissues does the production credit read "produced by David Gilmour" (or in at least one instance, "Dave Gilmour").  This article needs to reflect that initially, and for a period of at least 20 years, Richard Wright was a credited producer of this album.  If anyone can source the reason as to why his credit was removed, that would be interesting, valuable information.  But beyond question, this article absolutely needs to make mention of the fact that for the initial issue of the album, and for every subsequent reissue for the following two decades, Mr. Wright is listed as a producer of Barrett.    70.30.81.49 (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So what do you call the plentiful citations at the end of each paragraph there? FunkMonk (talk) 16:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I agree that there is too much interpretation in the songs part. There are also sentences that go nowhere like "The lyrics that describe the way for a person to kill time". Huh?Jules TH 16 (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Wright's production credit
Talk:Lookout Air Raids

message: Didnt a incidary bomb dropped by a Japanease bomb balloon cause fire in washinton State? Even stopping for awhile the electric power to Hanford site of nuclear research?! Teslaedsonfan (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For a definitive answer with references, this question is best asked at the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. This page is for discusssion regarding improving the Lookout Air Raids article. (I believe that the first answer is yes, though.) - 220.101 \ 15:43, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Didnt a bombing by hot air incideary bomb drop cause a fire Washington State? 

message: The intro. read that it was the first time the mainland US was attacked by enemy forces in WWII.  I changed it to "contiguous" (I mistakenly believed that Dutch Harbor is on the mainland of the US, although Alaska wasn't a state during WWII but, more importantly, is indeed contiguous to the rest of the US).
:Alaska is not contiguous with the first 48 states, as Canada is in the way. Binksternet (talk) 19:14, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: * Perhaps a reference citation would be an appropriate way to avoid conflicting individual interpretations. Thewellman (talk) 19:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainland" US attack 

message: the referance to "Mainland US" is incorrect as the bombing was where Naco's AZ is today; but it was in Mexico at the time not AZ USA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.39.4 (talk) 02:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction misleading -  

message: Many years ago, my mother told me several times that the Japanese shelled Brookings. I could find no other account of this, so ended up assuming that she had gotten the better-known shelling of Fort Stevens with the name of this southern Oregon town. (She often got facts like these confused.) So I want to add this note acknowledging my pleasure discovering that, many decades later, she was right. (Her other memory of WWII in Oregon -- visiting the beach to find barbed wire all about -- I never doubted.) -- llywrch (talk) 00:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A personal note
Talk:Based on a True Story (Fat Freddy's Drop album)

message: I've edited much of the potentially NPOV material out of this article as well as adding additional info. I think the NPOV tag ought to be removed now at other editors' discretion. --Samf-nz 02:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV tag 
Talk:Meritorious Unit Commendation

message: These awards across the services match only in name. Their criteria and level of recognition are all very different. I would think that it would be appropriate to split all of these out and make this a disambig page. In reading the services' award manuals using the names Army Meritorious Unit Commendation, Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation, and Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendation seems appropriate. EricSerge (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be a disabmiguation page?
Talk:Bat Out of Hell: Live with the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra

message: The capitalization of this album doesn't match the other albums (Bat out of Hell, etc.). I've moved the page in the interests of continuity. --Marysunshine 17:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation 
Talk:Area codes 903 and 430

message: The article page this is part of is called as a macro by transclusion for the pages Area code 430 and Area code 903.  This is done to allow those pages to have a link of 430 etc.  This can't be done with a redirect page (or at least, I don't think so).  Otherwise, what happens is in the "Area codes in the United States" category, you'd get a link for 430 and 903 instead of one link for each area code.  This is why it is done this way, or at least, why I did it this way.  Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 22:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: police departments in area code STARTING WITH 1 430 24.238.81.63 (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  looking for someone
Talk:Area codes 713, 281, 832, and 346

message: The article page this is part of is called as a macro by transclusion for the pages Area code 281, Area code 713 and Area code 832.  This is done to allow those pages to have a link of 281 etc.  This can't be done with a redirect page (or at least, I don't think so).  Otherwise, what happens is in the "Area codes in the United States" category, you'd get a link for 281, 713 and 832 instead of one link for each area code.  This is why it is done this way, or at least, why I did it this way.  Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 22:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Area codes 214, 469, 972, and 945

message: The article page this is part of is called as a macro by transclusion for the pages Area code 214, Area code 469 and Area code 972.  This is done to allow those pages to have a link of 214 etc.  This can't be done with a redirect page (or at least, I don't think so).  Otherwise, what happens is in the "Area codes in the United States" category, you'd get a link for 214, 469 and 903 instead of one link for each area code.  This is why it is done this way, or at least, why I did it this way.  Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) 22:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says " 1995 all of the old 214 territory outside Dallas County was split off as area code 972."  This is not accurate.  Although the 972 area code originally was assigned to a circle around downtown Dallas, it included areas that were not only within Dallas County, but were within the city limits of Dallas as well.  In the north and northeast, essentially all areas outside Interstate 635 were moved to 972.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  972 split 
Talk:Jim Gillette

message: His actual range is unknown, but I know for a fact that his range when he was a singer was about 6 octaves... consider that Adam Lopez has a range o 8 octaves
: On what references do you base this fact? SirWoland 07:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are enough references, don't be such a lazy ass, look for them yourself. Because posting em here won't change anything. Because no one wants to believe it.--85.179.63.244 21:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range is correct 

message: I'm not the biggest fan of glam...I actually despise it. I will however say that Jim is one of the most LOYAL and INSIGHTFUL people I have met. I started tattooing him in 2003 and it didn't take very log to befriend him. Slightly reserved,very direct,deep thinker,humbly arrogant(oxymoron, I know),very approachable and he doesn't let his erectile dysfunction get the best of him!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.142.97.119 (talk) 02:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personality... 
Talk:Shia population

message: The information in this page is duplicated at Demographics of Islam. There is no need for two separate pages. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you suggesting separate articles for Sunni Muslim and other branches so that they can show in the search engine? Or are you suggesting that Sunni Muslim be listed at Shi'a  population? It would help if you could explain where you are coming from rather massively rewriting existing articles without discussion. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would strongly support the merging of this article with the Demographics of Islam page.  The same information is already there; having a separate article here is redundant. MezzoMezzo 20:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I stumbled on this page when researching an answer for the reference desk.  I see that the figures are strikingly discrepant from those at Demographics of Islam.  For example the U.S. State Department says Shi'a population of Saudi Arabia is maybe 7%.  This article says 20%, whereas Demographics of Islam says 5%.  From this evidence, it starts to seem that this page should simply be deleted, since it has no new information, plus egregious errors of fact not present in the other article.  Wareh 01:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking closer, I see that this edit reduced the Saudi figure from 10% to 3%, referencing a talk discussion.  Later, User:Szahidr diff added a statement of 20% and chart figures for 15% (already suspiciously large based on the State Dept. number).  Third came what, I'm sorry, despite WP:AGF I'll say look like fraudulent inflations by User:71.167.95.91, which have since elicited the modest (but apparently correct for Saudi Arabia) complaint here (=current version as I write).  Wareh 01:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted to the last page version that looked plausible to me.  I realize it's possible some real facts were lost this way, but I'm confident some fake facts were removed.  The right thing to do is to hammer out verifiable reliable sources on this talk page.  Wareh 02:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article, like Demographics of Islam, has lots of made-up numbers. It's a pov fork. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much bad information does this page contain? 

message: This page appear sto have been subject to sustained small changes which might either be perfectly justified (but sh/would require references) or are (in all likelihood) POV induced vandalism. I have therefore protect the page against anonymous editing and hope that new changes will be made only with using references. WRyt the actual numbers - I have no clue which numbers are correct and have simply reverted bakc to the last edit before Anonymous struck. Refdoc 20:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Who are the Shiite population in China? Le Anh-Huy 10:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shiites in China
Talk:AD 500

message: In Events > by place, the bullets for Brittania are missing the heading, but when I added it, the page insists on displaying a huge amount of white space between Byzantine Empire and Brittania. Very distracting to read. Maybe someone else can figure out how to restore the heading without messing up the format. Schazjmd (talk) 23:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing heading in article
Talk:Deanna Durbin

message: The article says "Durbin turned down a Broadway role as Eliza Doolittle in My Fair Lady because, as she later said, "I had my ticket for Paris in my pocket." - with a reference to https://variety.com/2013/film/obituaries-people-news/singer-actress-deanna-durbin-dead-at-91-1200430331/ - but that just says "She was tempted to return just once, for “My Fair Lady” on Broadway in 1956, but she resisted in the end." The quote does not make sense because she had been in Paris 6 years by then. I find that quote in various places but none that looks particularly reliable. In any event, this is probably better included further down with other things she turned down.
Or is it better to move all of those up in to the career section ? -- Beardo (talk) 02:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Fair Lady 

message: She is supposed to appear in this Mario Puzo novel as ‘Deanna Dunn’. Worth a mention? And is the picture given accurate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:E287:1901:C159:D13B:31DB:9FCF (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Godfather
Talk:Levenshtein coding

message: This should probably be moved to Levenshtein coding; the dead link I made to this page contained a mispelling. 192.68.228.4 23:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 05:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did move from Levenstein coding to Levenshtein coding because this article was not moved but redirected.  --Meniv (talk) 09:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

message: What is the motivation behind this definition?
Why is it interesting/useful?
What special properties does it have?
It would be good include some background information.
Wstomv (talk) 09:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation for this coding
Talk:Lusca

message: To see my reasons, see Talk:Kraken
I think an article like this should distinguish the reported monster "lusca" from the purported cause "a gigantic octopus". They are distinct and even if the latter exists it may have nothing to do with the former. Tullimonstrum 19:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Article

message: Merge Lusca with Globster and/or St. Augustine Monster. all talk about the same damn picture, no idea why we have 3 articles on the same image. 72.199.100.223 (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I have read from this source http://www.newanimal.org/octopus.htm and it says that the holes in the bahamas where the lusca is reported from have very low amounts of oxygen and can only support single celled organisms like bacteria therefore discounting any possibility of there being a giant octopus living there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.100.52 (talk) 02:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Regarding the following line; "To attack properly on the surface, the octopus would have to have one tentacle on the sea floor to balance itself; this would mean that such accounts, if real, would have to take place in relatively shallow water."
Wouldn't the potential octopus simply just climb and attach itself on the wall near enough the prey at the surface instead of having to balance with one tentacle at the bottom? 
It seems really weird that it would be dependant of the bottom if it is a giant octopus, as the shape of a blue hole is such that an animal like a giant octopus with long arms could, as said, just stick itself to the surrounding wall and catch the prey at the surface by extending a single arm.
I therefore think the claim would need upport by a source as there didn't seem to be one in the article. - Okama-San (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  About a claim in the article