lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Kilz

message: This is an attempt to smear me, I corrected the fact that I was not logged in with a minor post within minutes. Why I was logged out I do not know.Kilz 22:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think anyone looking at this page will seriously believe you use sockpuppets based on what they can read on this page. I really don't think you need worry about it. It does seem at present that this is a frivolous case. Hopefully User:Widefox can learn from the reaction to it and no trouble will be necessary but if it forms part of a wider pattern of behaviour then it's possible that some action may be taken. --Cherry blossom tree 23:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you, I truly did not do what Im accused of. A sockpupet is something that is used to decieve. I had no intention of any of that and tried to rectify that it was me. Kilz 00:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have said a day ago that I double checked his IP history ... "... I could be wrong.".  Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/KilzWidefox 21:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree that you should not have been blocked for using a sockpuppet, as does Widefox. There was a discussion at the blocking admin's talk page which hasn't yet reached a conclusion.--Cherry blossom tree 22:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only problem is that now Widefox is using this judgement as proof that I have done something wrong. I quote "and User:Kilz banned". Kilz 04:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI Kilz selectively blanked his talk page - hiding the context of that first edit war. An admin has warned him that this is vandalism. Widefox 10:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that, it is priceless, and shows a pattern. You know that my talk page is archived. Widefox can be shown to know that by this statement on my talk page ":Might it help if Kilz slightly modified the link to his archive page, to show it's an archive above  Widefox 23:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a lie
Talk:Downtown Long Beach

message: So every suburb with an older section can now get an article? Perhaps Signal Hill and downtown Signal Hill would be separate?
--Jmohler1970 02:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pssh, look at New York City's article - which should naturally contain far more material than Long Beach. KyuuA4 22:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you count the numerous 'daughter' articles, such as History of New York City, the volume of information in the Wikipedia on New York City is much, much greater than the information on Long Beach, California. BlankVerse 06:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drawbridge, California

message: According to the USGS Geographic Names Information System, Drawbridge is within Alameda County, not Santa Clara County, although it's very close to the border.  But I don't have time right now to change both the county name and the reference to "one of two ghost towns in the county," given that it's not really in "the county" but in the one to the north.  I would be curious to know of other ghost towns in Alameda County, though.
And what's the deal with the reference to the "Murky News"?  Isn't the newspaper nicknamed that for reasons other than its reporting on Drawbridge?  The paragraph sounds like editorialization. Michael Patrick 15:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  The refs I added today say that Coyote Slough is the county line and that Drawbridge is just to the north.  Have to check to make sure that it's not in Fremont city limits now.  Article needs more about use of the site, salt ponds, etc.--Hjal 16:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In which county?

message: "For years after the turn bridge drawbridges were removed..."
:I think the  'turn bridges' refered to in this sentence are swing bridges, but this should be confirmed. ike9898 (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn bridge 
Talk:Duncans Mills, California

message: add back in if and when any of these are noted on by other media:
There is a campground along the Russian River with facilities for RVs.
Restaurants include Gold Coast Coffee and Bakery, Blue Heron Restaurant and Bar and the Cape Fear Cafe.
Antiques, gifts, and locally-grown flowers are sold.
There are at least three art galleries: mini photos of around the world, local artists, and early California.  Wine and cheese tastings are offered.
The town draws crowds every summer when it plays host to the Russian River Rodeo.
Many Civil War reenactments have been performed adjacent to the town.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: unsourced
Talk:E Embarcadero

message: This article should be updated, I guess. It seems that regular service did start in 2016 (at least that's what the time tables say, that I found) --PaterMcFly talk contribs 09:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: I propose that this article be merged with the F Market & Wharves article.  Both are heritage streetcar lines run by Muni and they use the same rail line between Fisherman's Wharf and the Ferry Building.  Link to the other article's talk page: Talk:F Market & Wharves#F Market & Wharves and E Embarcadero Merger Proposal.  Jackdude101 (Talk)</span>  16:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's best if this discussion take place entirely at Talk:F Market & Wharves#F Market & Wharves and E Embarcadero Merger Proposal – so please route all discussion over there, so it remains in one place. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: F Market & Wharves and E Embarcadero Merger Proposal
Talk:Eagle Rock High School

message: Ok gang, I realize this is an article about a high school - and sophmoric pranks will occur, but wikipedia has  notability guidelines and vandalisim will be reverted.  If you want to put up a notable graduate of ERHS, you need to reference your source or it will be removed.  Timmccloud 22:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Guidelines 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.erhsalum.com/history.htm and http://www.erhs.la/information/aboutus/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Earl Carroll Theatre

message: Nickelodeon on Sunset has been closed for a couple of years now, and news articles indicate that the theatre is reverting to its original name, Earl Carroll Theatre as part of a restoration process.
I also find it a bit awkward that Wikipedia has two separate, relatively short articles that discuss what is the exact same building.
I therefore propose that: 
# The Nickelodeon on Sunset article be renamed "Earl Carroll Theatre (Hollywood)"; 
# The material from this article about the Hollywood theatre be merged into the new Hollywood article; 
# This article be renamed "Earl Carroll Theatre (New York)" and focus on the Broadway theatre; and 
# A new disambiguation page be created for both the Hollywood and New York theatres, plus the Broadway Theatre (53rd Street) article.
Thoughts? Thanks, Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support. Makes good sense. Vzeebjtf (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

text: * Support Sounds like an excellent plan. Make it happen! Markhh (talk) 07:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the material on the West Coast theater to the other article. Upon reflection, I believe neither article should be moved. Vzeebjtf (talk) 08:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship of this article with [[Nickelodeon on Sunset]]
Talk:East Bay Express

message: This saddens me. I read this paper for many years. I personally know that most of the article is factual. But I'm not a reliable source. ALL of the references are from the E Bay Express itself. This article amounts to self-promotion. Second and third party references are badly needed. Tapered (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability and Reliable Sources
Talk:East Bay Municipal Utility District

message: I think the "Finances: EBMUD Revenue Model" header is unnecessary. It would be better if you keep all of that information under the "Finances" header. Also, the section "2015 EBMUD Drought Update" could be called "Effects of 2015 Drought". That would fit more with the style of Wikipedia. That link you added could be changed to a reference with an inline citation.
:Implemented the changes recommended above. Bruin2 (talk) 05:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, go ahead. Brycehughes (talk) 21:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. I have increased the importance to Mid. Bruin2 (talk) 05:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:East Blythe, California

message: The article states that East Blythe is a former CDP, but it doesn't say what East Blythe is today.  Is East Blythe now part of the city of Blythe, is it an obsolete term, or something else?  Thanks. MissionInn.Jim (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is East Blythe 
Talk:East Brother Island Light

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:East Brother Light on a stormy evening in March.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 7, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:East Brother Light on a stormy evening in March.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Elmdon

message: Yes should be split. I've cleanup the content a little to aid a split. MRSC 22:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this should be split. This is confusing as there is an infobox for the Essex village yet a reference to the Solihull settlement. - Erebus555 19:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I've moved the section on the pub into a slightly more encyclopedic format and added sections on other aspects of the village - of course this gives an inherent bias towards things I do (I'm a runner and don't play cricket, for example) but it's better than nothing I hope.
Mereden 15:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified structure and added other content 
Talk:East Hemet, California

message: This article needs an Economy section along with a listing of the top 10 employers --142.136.94.102 (talk) 20:45, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For cities, this information can usually be obtained from their Comprehensive annual financial reports, but East Hemet is not a city.  Do you know a reliable source for the top employers in East Hemet?—Stepheng3 (talk) 02:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy 
Talk:East Los Angeles College

message: The notable alumni list is somewhat questionable and is definately unsupported.
*Arthur Torres is stated to have: 
:::graduated from Montebello High School in 1964 where he was the ASB President his senior year. He holds a Bachelor's degree from UC Santa Cruz and a Juris Doctor from UC Davis School of Law.
*Gloria Molina - her education is not referenced at all
*Billy Bob Thornton just added and deleted is referenced as:
:::He attended Henderson State University in Arkadelphia, Arkansas, where he studied psychology but dropped out after two semesters.
::His own biography: http://www.billybobthornton.net/Hisfineself%20bio.html makes no mention of attending ELAC
The following are referenced as attending ELAC in either the linked article or in links to other articles located in the linked article.
*Leroy D. Baca
*Antonio Villaraigosa
*Bob Pacheco
Dbiel (Talk) 03:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni

message: what are the official colours of ELAC? Green and White?76.232.49.67 05:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coloures
Talk:Wilhelm Tomaschek

message: Searching the Web there is just couple of references to Tomaschek independent of Wikipedia. An obituary was published in Geographical Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5 (Nov., 1901), p. 544. He is mentioned among dozen of Austrian iranologists in . Pavel Vozenilek 22:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Village, San Diego

message: Any objections to moving it to East Village, San Diego as in East Village, Manhattan? It looks cleaner and San Diego is recognizable enough. Please let me know. XF Law talk at me 13:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope, i think that East Village, San Diego is perfect, and all San Diego's neightborhood should be changed too to just "XXX, San Diego" instead of the long name of "XXX, XXX, California". --Vrysxy ¡Californication! 20:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, look where we are. Much better, especially from a search POV. XF Law talk at me 06:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: — Assignment last updated by ArvinAceAttorney (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis - Summer Session22
Talk:Eastside High School (Lancaster, California)

message: Phrasing
I suppose I understand what "dual gender" is supposed to mean, maybe, but "isolated sex"?  Isn't there a better way to say what is happening on the teams?  
Does it mean there are teams with players of all genders playing simultaneously, or is it saying there are parallel teams for given sports that are gender segregated, and sports intended for one sex only, or sports for a single player? 
104.173.93.105 (talk) 00:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Swiss Life Select

message: The AWD Holding AG was one of the main political campain sponsors of the former chancellor Gerhard Schröder who thanked them by changing the pension and unemployment laws. Hartz_concept and de:Riester-Rente
See: http://www.google.com/search?q=Der+Drückerkönig+und+die+Politik 77.23.144.154 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AWD and politics 
Talk:Ecology of California

message: On 2012-10-23 I added the PROD tag to this article to propose its deletion. I feel that it qualifies for deletion for a number of reasons. First, it is an unnecessary article whose content is better covered, and covered more specifically, in articles such as California, Geography of California, Climate of California, and Deserts of California. This article seems to be little more than an expanded list. It also doesn't discuss "ecology" hardly at all, which is a dated, nebulous, and vague subject area to begin with. I don't feel that "Ecology of California" is a good subject for an article or a good title for an article that attempts to cover the subjects in this article. 
Also—California is such a large state with such a massive diversity of biological communities, climates, terrains, and eco-regions, that it would be nearly impossible to bring all those subjects together adequately, under the heading of "ecology," without creating a huge amount of overlap on other articles that are already well-developed. 
The concept of geography much more adequately covers the subject matter that this article seems to be trying to back itself into. The Geography of California article (to which this article links in its see also list) seems to be off to a much better start of covering these topics, and doing so in a reliable and verifiable fashion. While the Geography of California article lacks much info on biota, that is also a legitimate domain of geography. The discussion of bioregions (which seems to be the focus of this "Ecology of California" article) would be better discussed as a subject of geography. 
Tellingly, the first paragraph of this article invokes "bioregionalists" and a poet as authorities for this article, to define...what exactly? Geographic areas? Now we're talking about geography again. It seems this content wants to be part of a geography article to me. 
Also, the article only has two citations and a relatively short (though chronologically long) edit history. Rather than engaging in a drawn-out attempt to draw editors to make more citations and references for this undeveloped article, I think it would be best to just delete it. I myself am not going to spend time developing and finding citations for an unorganized, undirected article like this that clearly has little importance on Wikipedia. 
My PROD tag was removed by User:Rotten regard with no comment. I will be sending this article up for AfD now. Darkest tree (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion proposal 

message: recent research connects calis ecological diversity to its native language diversity: (user:mercurywoodrose)99.23.83.234 (talk) 04:42, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to languages
Talk:Edward McCarthy (police officer)

message: As it stands, the quotation taken from the website doesn't seem to sit well in Wikipedia. While there might not be a problem with the copy-paste, it seems as if the article is entirly centered around that quote. 
Also, the citation isn't "clean" - there's some typos that managed to work their way in, and there's possibly some style issues.  --Sigma 7 11:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation
Talk:Eel River Brewing Company

message: In 1997, Wolaver's was the first certified organic brewery, so there should be an asterisk next to the statement taken from Greg Koch's reference. The information on Wolaver's 1997 certification is on wikipedia, other beer books, and various news articles of the time. -- jamesewelch   — Preceding undated comment added 21:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: First Certified Organic Brewery
Talk:Eisenhower Medical Center

message: I will respectfully be deleting the "notable patients" section. One, it's not very full and has not been used much. And secondly, I just think it doesn't serve the article well. If it *was* used, then we'd be getting into a possible debate over who is a "notable" person. This area is an area where many people in the entertainment industry have homes, particularly retirement homes, and that means they're likely to be brought here....but if they died at this facility, that information can be listed in the article about THEM, not this one. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:A540:983B:BFA5:1795 (talk) 20:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable patients
Talk:El Cajon Boulevard riot

message: Apparently, there is only one source on this page. The jalopyjournal the john straub citation are essentially just blogspam with a non-notable anecdote about one the writer's uncles being the only new information in them. This is also such a long page it raises the question of being blogspam copying in itself. I've added the one source tag and it wants to open discussion on the talk page, so that's what I've done here. Cheers. Kire1975 (talk) 09:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:El Camino High School (South San Francisco, California)

message: This article appears to be without a category. But if you go into add one you can see it at the bottom of the page. I have not encountered this before. Has any one else? JustAGal 20:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  High school category problem 

message: Once again, another class list appears in this school-article. Very unencyclopedic. I will remove it soon. Skyscraper Phoenix 05:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The class list again: Wikipedia - Not a class registration form
Talk:El Cerrito Plaza (shopping center)

message: Remind me in ten years if I forget. { \mathbb{JPG} } 05:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll try to remember to take a photo next time I'm down there.
Talk:El Dorado High School (Placentia, California)

message: There is a contradiction in this article. The first paragraph falsely states that the gymnasium was named for the first Athletic Director, Joe Raya. The first Athletic Director was Tom Byrnes, Joe Raya was the Equipment Manager. I know this as I was there in 1967.
In the Staff section it is correctly stated.
I tried fixing this once, but some east coast editor marked it as vandalism and deleted it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.173.50.18 (talk) 21:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gym Dedication 

message: I have listed Joe Raya as an "Athletics department staff member." If you wish to clarify his title please do so, but be sure to cite your source per Wikipedia's citation guidelines to avoid future confusion.
Thanks!  ~ Butros (Talk) 08:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearing up Joe Raya information 

message: Any chance this recent news event would be mentioned in this article? This is the only incidence I've ever heard of a teacher killing herself in a classroom and being found by her own students. It's just unbelievably tragic and a notable event for this history of this school.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.55.188 (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teacher Committed Suicide At This School
Talk:El Dorado Regional Park, Long Beach, California

message: It is difficult to determine if this article is about the El Dorado Park neighborhood or El Dorado Regional Park, or both. Alanraywiki (talk) 22:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood or park? 

message: This article as it is now has some errors — for one, as far as I know there is no "El Dorado Park" neighborhood, though there are multiple neighborhoods (like El Dorado Park Estates) that have it in their name. I think I'm going to do some initial edits to make the distinction more clear, such as adding a section for adjacent neighborhoods, but would appreciate any feedback. I think the best outcome would be for this article to be renamed to be about the park, and the neighborhoods can have sub-headings. Windysmile (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Park vs. neighborhoods
Talk:El Granada, California

message: The TV program PBS NOVA mentions on its website that there was a detention camp for Japanese Americans during world war II near "Granada, California. Is this in fact El Granada? If so, it would be worth mentioning in the "History" section of this article. Here is the link to the PBS program: http://www.pbs.org/thewar/detail_5190.htm Grr82 (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese-American detention camp? 