lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sierra Highway

message: FYI, only a few miles of Sierra Highway are signed SR-14U. The current iteration of the Major intersection table implies the entire southern portion of the route is signed SR-14U, which is not correct. I have asked for feedback on how to handle the major intersections table for this route at WT:USRD. Dave (talk) 22:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most recent additions to the Major Intesections section contain an error
Talk:Sierramont Middle School

message: I have removed the details of chess team results from the article because there is no assertion of notability. To be notable, the team would need to (for example) win or be placed highly in a recognised and/or national competition. Even then, the individual names of chess team members is unlikely to be notable enough for inclusion in the article on the school. What passes for notability can be found at WP:N. There is not a category for chess teams, but some useful guidance might be found under the active proposal for sports people in the list on the right.
If you wish to re-add the chess team details and think they emet the notability criteria, please discuss here first.
I have also removed the sentence on academic results in 2006, because it was:
* provided without context (it is not clear to an outside reader what the numbers mean or how they compare with other schools)
* out of date (it is no longer 2006); and
* written like an advertisement (without having a copy handy I suspect it is a cut and paste from a school newsletter)
If anyone has more up to date material on academic outcomes and how they add to the notability of the school, please feel free to include them in the article.  Euryalus 00:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chess team results
Talk:Silicon Valley Power

message: This page is blatant advertising for the company named; it even names prices and rebates directly! Should be deleted as soon as possible. --B. Wolterding 17:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: Articles should rely on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Blog entries and Twitter are not considered reliable sources. --Stepheng3 (talk) 04:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Silver Creek High School (California)

message: Did the transformer incident really occur or May 8? I have my doubts -- I feel it was at least a couple weeks before this time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.245.30.113 (talk) 20:04, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

message: everyone knows silver creek is east side  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.66.202 (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: correction

message: There must be something else to say other than sports - history, attainment?--Tacyarg (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything other than sports?
Talk:Silver Strand (San Diego)

message: For over 80 years the Tijuana River has dumped sewage and other crap into the United States. It has been an unmitigated ecological disaster. Heavy metal contamination, raw sewage and trash is measured in tens of meters in depth in the TJ River Valley which is a so called natural wildlife preserve.
This is the longest documented ecological issue of any river in the United States and it is not mentioned. It is often overlooked by the US Federal Government and the State of California.
Most of the beaches north (in the USA) of where the Tijuana River enters the Pacific Ocean are contaminated more than 70% of the year like at Imperial Beach. Unhealthful bacteria has been tracked all the way north to the mouth of the San Diego Bay. And occasionally far beyond. The US Navy Seal area in Coronado often can not train with the hazardous crap in the water.
Why has none of this been mentioned?  Jrcrin001 (talk) 21:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beach Water Contamination
Talk:Antonov An-24

message: Someone at commons claimed that the MIAT plane is actually an AN-26B. could someone with a better knowledge of Antonov designs please follow this up? Yaan (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Saw another picture of the same plane that revealed a big loading ramp in the rear section. So, it's very probably an AN-26. Yaan (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong picture? 

message: I have started an article on the Y7 and have incorporated the relevant changes in this article ( abit of a delay due to network problems though)Petebutt (talk) 08:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Xi'an Y7

message: This recently released documentary pretty clearly shows a group of western tourists about to board an AN-24 in North Korea.  
edit:removed youtube link which is apparently disallowed.   The title is Dictatorship, Paranoia, Famine: Welcome to North Korea! and the airplane appears around 40:10.   It's not named, but is visually pretty clearly an AN-24.   
The doc was also posted here https://deutsches-fernsehen.mediaportal24.com/dictatorship-paranoia-famine-welcome-to-north-korea/
Apparently it was filmed in 2011, as Kim Jong Un is cited as 27 years old. Probably too long ago to assume they're still in service.
 71.178.237.241 (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AN-24 in current service with Air Koyro?
Talk:Silverado, California

message: * School Accountability Report Card SILVERADO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Info about a school in Silverado (no rancho info for me).
*Silverado Library - library info (ditto). Ronbo76 06:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources for this article 

message: I removed the large amount of material that appears to have been taken from this document:
http://www.intercanyon.org/e-pubs/doc/2007.0801.canyon.history.doc
--Bighead 06:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed plagiarised material 

message: The top section of this article is too long for comfortable reading. It should be just a short introduction of the subject, not basically the whole article.--TGC55 (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section is too long.
Talk:Antonov An-28

message: Je suis en RDC et j'exploite AN28 si posible envoyer le diferent pour l'elaboratoin du leadsheel;leadmessage;trimsheet ainsi que le plan de vol operatoinnelle.
Adresse:E mail:papymbalu@yahoo.fr
        Tel:(+243)898 238 222  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.220.207.9 (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recherche de document d'exploitation 

message: The year of introduction must be wrong. They can't have been producing it for 10 years before introducing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.58.129.250 (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction year 

message: Article reviewed and edited for grammar, B-Class-4 flag cleared. Tedmarynicz (talk) 10:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Talk:Antonov An-71

message: This will never be more than a stub but could help enlarge the An-72 article. I propose that the bones of this article be incorporated in the An-72 article and this changed to a re-direct.Petebutt (talk) 13:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Has grown to more than that. Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:57, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Freeform surface modelling

message: This animation, while quite instructive, doesn't render at smaller sizes. Pictures really shouldn't be so large in articles so I've moved it here for the time being. If I was mistaken or someone can place it back in the article at a 300pxish size that would be fine. Also, the other images should have captions to directly explain what they are representing. Thanks,  DVD+ R/W 00:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article
Talk:Skeggs Point (California)

message: I didn't think these existed, but I was wrong: 1950 DeSoto Suburban. Ah, I see we even have a writeup. Now for a free photo? 
"It's not what we don't know that's the problem, it's what we know that ain't so."
-- Mark Twain (probably)
Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 16:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neil Young's 1950 DeSoto Suburban
Talk:Skyline Boulevard

message: too short to be anything but a stub at present. Lots of potential for expansion of this strategically located road: ecology, views, relation to sf perimeter trail, history, etc. Anlace 02:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial assessment under project california

message: This article seems to add nothing to California State Route 35 - there is very little of Highway 35 that isn't on the Skyline.  It would seem sensible to merge them - any conflicting views out there before I do it?  seglea 19:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Smith Peak

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Moved, as an uncontested technical request. Any objection within a reasonable time frame should see the move reverted. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 07:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Smith Peak (Tuolumne County, California) →  – Unnecessary disambiguation; see Special:PrefixIndex/Smith Peak. Note that Smith Peak (Antarctica) exists but is a redirect, so this still seems to be the WP:PRITOP. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 May 2024
Talk:Smith River (California)

message: How is this the longest free-flowing river in California? The Santa Clara River is  long and is not dammed anywhere along its length. Even if you take the  Middle Fork of this river and add it to the length, it totals  which is not half of the Santa Clara River. Shannon1talk contribs 23:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest free-flowing river? 

message: The Middle Fork flows through a scenic rocky canyon, within the Recreation Area, which canyon is traversed by the Redwood Highway (US-199).  This scenic highlight is certainly worth mentioning.67.185.163.124 (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scenic Smith River Canyon
Talk:Chlorogalum

message: hate to ask a stupid question, but how did soap plants get their name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.61.78 (talk) 01:32, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's in a name? 

message: : "The young leaves of certain species can be used as food, but the saponins in the bulbs make these poisonous. However saponins are very poorly absorbed by the body and usually pass straight through, and in any case they can be destroyed by thorough cooking."
Okay, it's either poisonous when eaten raw, or it's not. I think we need some clar. Kortoso  (talk) 17:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuisine??? 
Talk:Solano Community College

message: It seems pretty clear to me that from the very first revision of this article that it was copied and pasted from SCC's website.  Because of this, the article can't simply be modified so that it's not, since the revisions are still there; it has to be redone from scratch, in own words.
http://www.solano.edu/campus_info/index.html: Established in 1945 as Vallejo Junior College, Solano was part of the Vallejo Unified School District until 1967 when the College became a countywide institution.  The 192-acre campus, centrally located just off Interstate 80, was completed in 1971 and opened with 5,000 students.
First revision of article: Established in 1945 as Vallejo Junior College, Solano was part of the Vallejo Unified School District until 1967 when the College became a countywide institution.  The 192-acre campus, located just off Interstate 80, was completed in 1971 and opened with 5,000 students.
Again, looks pretty clear to be copyright infringement.  
Also, wasn't I specific enough just by including the URL of the original page?
--Geopgeop 04:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not copyvio. It's only one sentence, where most of the article is original. But it includes a source so we know where we got that claim from. --wL<speak·check> 20:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Solimar Beach

message: The redirect Dulah, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Dulah, California]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Dulah, CA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 09:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Dulah, CA]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Somis, California

message: The article is about an historic unincorporated community in Ventura County, California. Two sections had been added that did not belong here. The education was just a copy, as you can see, from the School District Webpage.
The Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District section was just a copy from the Camarillo article. Although it may serve these residents, the same section can't exist on two pages (The recreation district is separate from the City and should have its own page.)
The rest of the article is fairly accurate though unsourced.
Fettlemap (talk) 21:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive Deletions 
Talk:Sonora, California

message: These August 26 edits from  were a copyvio of http://www.sonoraca.com; I have removed the content.  Please see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches when re-adding content.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio removed 

message: User:Sonoraca is possibly the registered account of an employee working for the city of Sonora. Please be advised, they are simply copying and pasting information from the city website and pasting here as if it were a tourist brochure. There is currently a block against this account, but be alert for further city workers registering accounts and trying to advertise on Wikipedia. Vayne (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refrain from removing citation needed tags, using misleading edit summaries, and introducing uncited text as you did here. Also note this media report of your edits here.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonora City Chamber of Commerce Advertising on Wikipedia 

message: I noticed that the Education section of this article doesn't include either Sonora High School or Sonora Elementary School. I would like to list both school under the Education section because they're the namesake educational institutions of the city. My references include the Sonora Elementary's website as well as their listing on the Department of Education's website. I have also verified this information with Sonora High's website as well as their listing on the California Department of Education's website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiakauf (talk • contribs) 23:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Education Institutions
Talk:Soquel, California

message: Are these population numbers correct? 
1990	9,188		47.9%
2000	5,081		−44.7%
2010	9,644		89.8%
Huh? Either something really weird happened between 1990 and 2000, and then again last decade, or these numbers are way off. I'm somewhat familiar with this little seaside town and there hasn't been the construction or level of urban decay for those figures to make sense. 2601:9:1100:41E:C852:2E31:4DA1:4036 (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the US census website, and these population figures match.  I suspect there were some neighborhoods missed in the 2000 Census. —Stepheng3 (talk) 05:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Soquel, when spoken is often confused with SoCal, an informal term for Southern California, which Soquel is not a part of.  Should there be a disambiguation?108.225.17.141 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add some just in case.—Stepheng3 (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation with Socal? 

message: What does the name Soquel mean? 2600:1010:B060:A0BE:5490:4EDB:99B3:8AB (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the name Soquel mean?
Talk:Sorrento Valley, San Diego

message: I am concerned about the "major" companies section, as I feel it is too vague as a categorization header. Are these publicly traded companies? Major employers? Household names? Any company with its own Wikipedia article? Would a large worldwide company with a small office here qualify? A lot more companies could be included in the list, and it seems to me that some currently listed maybe shouldn't be. Without a clearer categorization, it is basically catch-as-catch-can. -- Rnickel (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Major" Companies? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Otay Mesa, San Diego which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Universal Studios Family Productions

message: The history section was a direct copy of a press release, so I removed that, leaving the article just an introductory statement and a list of films. When I went back and looked at the press release, it appears that the introductory statement is also a copy from a press release. If I remove that, the article will just be a list of films. Seeing as how there is already an article for Universal Animation Studios, I'm redirecting this page to that. If someone wants to put together a good article on this topic that isn't press release material or a copyright violation of any sort, I have no objection to that. ScottW 01:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting
Talk:South East High School (South Gate, California)

message: This page is completely copywritten. I will be rewriting it. 69.232.36.200 01:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copywright
Talk:South High School (Torrance, California)

message: Of the current alums listed (all of whom have WP pages), many or most of them do not mention on their own page that they went to South. Per the last line quoted above, they all should in order to be included here.  In fact, Bobby Blotzer's page says he went to Torrance High. How about we clean up the list of already-included alumni before we go adding more? Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 03:55, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Juan Croucier would appear to also have gone to Torrance High rather than South (neither he nor Blotzer are in my 1974 yearbook).--NapoliRoma (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Existing listings

message: I went to South High School, graduating in 2010, and I was south of Lomita Blvd. According to article, this would mean that I should not have gone there. This is obviously wrong, as in addition both main feeder middle schools for South High are below Lomita Blvd. I do not know, however, where the exact line south is (most likely at the border with Palos Verdes and Redondo Beach. Any input?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.206.129.93 (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll look into it. ȸ (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catchment Area for Students is wrong.
Talk:South Hills High School (West Covina, California)

message: The entire article is unreferenced. Even though this information is possibly correct, it isn't credible without proper citation. Whoever wrote the sections of this article should cite the areas of the external links that they used. Edit: Never mind, I was mistaken. Nearly all of the external links are direct links to the school; the citations to verifiable information must be to links independent to the school. In other words, the referenced links must not be published or written by South Hills High School itself.
71.118.111.146 05:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Read the article. It's everywhere.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.99.211.106 (talk) 17:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism.
Talk:South Park, San Diego

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:San Ysidro, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Apparently there are people out there who don't believe that the neighborhood of South Park is a separate neighborhood from Golden Hill (the neighborhood it originally grew out of), but is it worth a whole paragraph? I don't know anyone who can't distinguish between the two and it is universally treated as a distinct location in the local media. 
Even the quote from the owner of the Big Kitchen who is apparently some sort of South Park denier is from a story in The Reader about the communities of North Park and SOUTH PARK. The cover of the magazine even refers to the feature as "North Park vs. South Park"
I think that part of the confusion stems from the city's use of the term "Greater Golden Hill" area in regards to city services and planning, as seen in the following map which was once part of the article: http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/community/profiles/maps/mapgoldenhill.jpg, but this has nothing to do with the city's neighborhood designations as the same map lumps the Gaslamp, Cortez Hill, and East Village neighborhoods under the listing of "centre" and the neighborhoods of Sherman Heights, Grant Hill, and Stockton under the label "Southeastern San Diego." 
I have edited the article to distinguish the differences between South Park, and Golden Hill/Greater Golden Hill. Hopefully this makes the article more readable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoeless Ho (talk • contribs) 03:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Park/Golden Hill 

message: I moved the paragraph about the naming "controversy" from the top of the page to its own section. There is no controversy now, as far as the city is concerned: South Park is a designated neighborhood and appears on their maps. It's still part of the Golden Hill Planning Community and Judy (and some other old-timers) still insist it's part of Golden Hill, but everyone has an opinion. Orayzio (talk) 17:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judy Section Separated 

message: I removed the awkwardly worded sentence about the Brooklyn Heights historic neighborhood and the Presbyterian Church because I couldn't find any references to support this. I have no problem with someone adding this back in, if an acceptable reference can be found.Orayzio (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brooklyn Heights