Talk:Command & Conquer: The First Decade

message: The C&C1 spin-off Sole Survivor is missing on this compilation. Shouldn't this be mentioned?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.3.245.10 (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sole Survivor missing 

message: I'd like to know why my edits are being reverted. --Zeno McDohl 14:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts 

message: Could someone get this on C&C series I tried but I just get a red link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamhaw (talk • contribs) 
:What page? --69.204.179.124 17:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Main Page

message: I don't know if this should be included, but the C&C modding community basically hates EA thanks to this product. And also it only sometimes works too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.235.152.211 (talk) 01:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also 

message: Removed comment about Replacementdocs not working, tested just then and loaded fine, also, should have been on discussion page rather than front page Resonanttoe (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 

message: Does anyone have a replacement link for the official The First Decade forum? that link to longer works -- it shows up with an error page on EA's website reading: "Error: you do not have permission to view the requested forum or category." I logged in just to be sure, but the error page still comes up. Cody-7 (talk) 23:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The official "The First Decade" forums link broken 

message: The unofficial 1.03 patch is prominently advertised on the EA-run CommandAndConquer.com and Apoc (who seems to be an EA employee based on his comments about the C&C 3 development team) supports it. Although he doesn't speak for the company, the patch seems to be notable enough and I figured it really ought to be mentioned. So I updated the patches section and a few other areas to reflect that. I removed the bugs section because all of the remaining issues (except for the Lands of Lore II and Bladerunner preview videos in RA, I think) were fixed in the recent patch and it just seemed pointless to keep the section when every line ended "This has been fixed in..." So I took a few sentences from it and incorporated them into the patch section. And for the record, I for one am glad that all these issues are finally fixed, even if EA never was motivated enough to fix it themselves. At least they advertise it when somebody else actually does make the fixes. -Thunderforge (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Info about the Unoffical 1.03 patch 

message: It is mentioned in two separate places in the article that it is a 65-page and a 70-page manual. Which is true?
See this and this.
 
--Dyaa (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of pages of the manual 

message: I just noticed that citation number 2 (http://www.ea.com/official/cc/firstdecade/us/news.jsp?src=Patch102) is broken. It basically redirects to EA's main news page (at the moment, it redirects to this: http://www.ea.com/games/command-and-conquer-4). If someone could fix this, it would be great. -XJDHDR (talk) 22:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken citation