lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Allama Ghulam Ahmed Parwez

message: This is a repetition of the same article at 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghulam_Ahmed_Pervez#Sources
It needs to be deleted.
Asjad Bukhari, thanks for starting this article. You've got lots of good information and organization here, but right now it's an essay not an encyclopedia article. Maybe we could work together to make some changes so that this becomes a Wikipedia article. We need some changes in the formatting (italics and bold, sections). Do you feel comfortable doing that? We also need some external references. Could you supply those? These would be the names of some of his most important books and also links to reputable web sites (external to Wikipedia and mirror sites). In addition, we need to find some way to make more links between this and other aritcles. Do you know how to do this? Finally, an extra issue might be to find links between this article and those written in Pakistani languages. Do you know of any Wiki articles in Urdu? Would you be able to write some and then link with this one? Thanks. Interlingua  talk 02:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some formatting but was unsure about the names of some of the books. Could someone see if I've divided them correctly. Interlingua  talk 03:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikifying this Article
Talk:Trews

message: I ran into a reference  to trews in a translation of tacitus’ histories 2.20 in 110CE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.129.56.253 (talk) 09:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

message: This article left me confused.  It describes the garment as: "form-fitting garments, similar to the footed hose of the Renaissance, from which they probably evolved. They could be cut as Knee-breeches or full length."  It goes on to say that "Traditional trews are actually long hose. These hose came all the way up to the waist and were attached to a linen cloth (NB: These were not trousers). They were fastened at the lower leg, below the knee, by a garter"
These descriptions could easily apply to breeches of all kinds, which evolved from form-fitting hose/stockings and coupled below as various lengths (depending on style).  To add to the confusion, the article notes that these are not trousers, yet they certainly seem to fit the very broad definition of trouser in the trouser article which includes breeches or all kinds in its definition (yes, the culottes and the sans-culottes together).  What, specifically, is the distinction between trews and breeches other than being in Scotland?   If there is none, and it is a kind of beeches what specifically distinguishes it from other kinds? TheCormac (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Distinction from Breeches?

message: This article seems to be about the very same garment which is detailed in the Truis article. I don't know enough to feel confident in doing so myself.  Canæn  02:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely agree! Anyone else feel differently?  If no one objects, I can do it.  - PKM 03:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, do! Incidentally, some of the text is copied from the end of the military history article in the external link Jezza 15:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reminder.  Done, and if any of the text is still too close to the external link, let me know.  I have added a footnote to the article. - PKM 18:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In the first paragraph the first reference states that "Trews is the origin of the word trousers.[1]" Unfortunately the reference does not state this. 
We either need a new reference for this statement or it needs to be removed as erroneous. --Daunorubicin (talk) 12:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I've removed the reference. Markb (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect reference 

message: A deconstruction of the original trews showing the flat single piece of material and where it is sewn together would aid understanding of the garment's construction. Ralph Corderoy (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material cutting pattern would add clarity
Talk:Martin B-57 Canberra

message: This says the rotary bomb bay was adapted to the design when Martin took over. The next section on the B-57B says it was a new feature of the B model, along with the bubble canopy, etc. Which is it?
70.16.214.204 (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, why hasn't this been fixed? Mztourist (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bomb bay
Talk:Shrutakirti

message: said "Shrutakirti is not that important character". IMO, she was a princess, royalty are almost always notable in Wikipedia. Dear, An Indian mythology expert  How do you think? Cape Diamond MM (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope I don't think such short article should be on Wikipedia. There is no enough information about this character. Ratan375 (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you but I will happily change my decision to merge if I read Redtigerxyz's comment on this article. However I also love Indian Myth. Cheers Cape Diamond MM (talk) 14:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree that Shrutakirti is a minor character. Probably should be merged into Shatrughna, with whom the info is mostly overlapping. I checked the Puranic encyclopedia by Mani too. Hardly any info is available. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  13:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please kindly add any info to article if you free. Cape Diamond MM (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cape Diamond MM, I checked. This is all the info we know about her.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  12:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been expanded by , so merger is unnecessary! Thank you so much for your great work Ratan375 ! Cape Diamond MM (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss 

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating this article. It would be better if you could add page numbers for each cited Google books. Regards..
Gazal world (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:Angada

message: I have read about this is my schoolbook. When i was in my 4th or 5th standard there was a lesson in my Hindi textbook on Angad kood. I could not find any reference of this on internet. But the lesson Angad kood i liked so much that i remember it till date. So i request you to anyone please find a reference for this article and please provide your feedback if any one has read about this anywhere. Thanks and Regards. Premchanda (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Angad Kood

message: Removed section as references were unreliable. Generally, Vali is described as reincarnated as Jara. Specific examples being the Krittivasi Ramayana, Mahanataka and the Ananda Ramayana. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  05:52, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reincarnation as Jara 

message: The depiction of Angada in Ravan's court is incorrect. Angad did not coil his tail into a seat and sit on it; that was by Hanuma in Ravan's court.Sridhar10chitta (talk) 03:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Angada in Ravan's court
Talk:Jambavan

message: sri Jambabavan is incarnation of Lord Brahma. And as far as i know, in Ramayanam he is said to be one of the seranjeevi like Hanuman. So we can confine his life period to dwapara yuga.
In Rama - Ravana war, Jambavan gave kick to Ravana in his chest that made ravana senseless.
Hanuman, Jambavan and Sugriva had dueled Ravana seprately. All the three proved to be invincible made ravana tired and unconcious many times. We can find the duels in Kambaramayana. Hanuman is known as 'Sollin Selvan'(tamil), meaning known for his words,he wont give up his words. During duel between hanuman and ravana, Hanuman said to ravana as 
followed
"If u dont die in this blow, then i won't fight u anymore" with blow given to ravana, he fell senseless but stood again.
Next Ravana said, 
"If u survive in my blow, then ur name will be praised all time in 14 lokas"
In dash both hanuman and ravana fell down. Ravana by himself praised hanuman's strength.
Hanuman willingly left the duel. 
So we cant say ravana easily handled hanuman's punches...
While Duel with Jambavan, Ravana  baited jambavan as " You Old ripen Bear gona kill me"
For his ego, Jambavan gave mighty blows with his hands. Kambar in his ramayana says Jambavan palm was covering ravana's whole face.! Such a giant jambavan, Lord of Bears!. Jambavan quickly gave deadly blows to all his 10 faces and fierce kick in his chest making him flat on his chariot.
I have a doubt. Who is the wife of Jambavan and the mother of Jambavati? Could some answer me this? Vishal Kandassamy (talk) 04:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Jambavan - The Immortal

message: I suppose a name change of this article to Jambavan  or Jambavaan , for the reason please refer to the argument given to the other such request.-- DhavalTalk 15:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change request
Talk:Tataka

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thataka Bigshotnews 02:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge it with Thataka article 

message: Hence, it is relevant to merge.
Guckoo (talk) 07:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes these two articles point to same Thataka.
Talk:Ulupi

message: The second paragraph in the section “Marriage with Arjuna”, as it stands, is weirdly written: Arjuna is pulled into the water by Ulupi, ends up in the underwater kingdom and offers his rites, but realises that this happened afterwards? Or does he just realise that it was Ulupi afterwards? But that makes no sense, because he couldn't have known Ulupi beforehand. Other resources don't go into much detail on this either.
I'll change the tempus of the second paragraph to present, please revert if this gives an incorrect impression about the format of the story.
Niplav (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section “Marriage with Arjuna” was weirdly written
Talk:I Love Rock N' Roll (1981)

message: Not sure why this version has its own page, as it says the same thing as the main I Love Rock 'N Roll article. -- eo 03:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely this page should be about the hit single, with the main page about the song in general.  The Billboard box should not go to the general song page. -- Beardo 12:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge tag
Talk:Janamejaya II

message: The last paragraph contains the word 'khera'. Could someone replace it with the correct English word? Cunningpal (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: khera?
Talk:Jarasandha

message: Anybody knows the actual caste of king jarasandh? i m curious about to know the caste...pls help me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.246.2.218 (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caste of King Jarasandh 

message: Actually I am Anuj Prasad Singh also belong to this cast accourding to history jarasandh was a chandrabansi king and after defeted by krisna all there faimly and there relative are spered all india with diffrent- diffrent cast but there Bansaj(cast) kwon as chandrabansi(kahaar) also there so many name of cast like Dimar,gyakward,Gourd,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.22.105.138 (talk) 12:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =======================

message: The Mahabharata states that Jarasandha was killed because he tried to sacrifice kings to Shiva.  In book 2 (Sabha Parva), section 22, Krishna states:
But thou, O king, treating other kings with cruelty, seekest to offer them as sacrifice unto the god Rudra! O son of Vrihadratha, this sin committed by thee may touch even us, for as we are virtuous in our practices, we are capable of protecting virtue. The slaughter of human being as sacrifice unto the gods is never seen. Why dost thou, therefore, seek to perform a sacrifice unto god Sankara by slaughtering human beings?
Hokie Tech (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why he was Killed 

message: Please explain the reason for adding the unsourced content @ -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for revert
Talk:Satyaki

message: This is wrong. Kritavarma along with Akrura plotted to kill Satrajit, the father of Satyabhama.24.139.24.163 (talk) 04:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satyaki narrates the story of Kritavarma plotting to kill Devaki's father.  

message: never gonna give you upgonna let you down 103.216.212.55 (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satyaki is a bug in McDonald's and near media you
Talk:Sanjaya

message: I had to change the translation of Sanjaya. It said Sanjaya "literally" means victory. Sanjaya does not literally mean victory. Anus does.
From the sanskrit dictionary
Jaya means:
jaya -  mfn. ( %{ji}) ifc. conquering , winning see %{RtaM-} , %{kRtaM-} , %{dhanaM-jaya4} , %{puraM-} , %{zalruM-} ; m. (Pa1n2. 3-3 , 56 Ka1s3.) conquest , victory , triumph , winning , being victorious 
San means:
san -  1 cl. 1. P. , 8. P. A1. (Dha1tup. xiii , 21 ; xxx , 2) %{sa4nati} , %{-te} or %{sano4ti} , %{sanute} (A1. rare and only in non-conjugational tenses, to gain , acquire , obtain as a gift , possess , enjoy, RV. AV. Br. S3rS. ; to gain for another , procure , bestow , give , distribute 
So Sanjaya can mean someone who gains victory or who conquers or wins, or one who gives those things. Shiva das 12:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of Sanjaya

message: We have at least 'three' disambiguation redirects at the beginning of this article. Why don't we put all those redirect notices in Sanjay disambiguation article, and have one message redirecting disambiguation traffic there? It would certainly be less clunky. Siyavash 02:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Another user just added Malakar to the top again. How about making Sanjaya the disambiguation and moving this page to something like Sanjaya (Hinduism)? eLLe.Le 00:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulky disambiguation passages 

message: He had excellent intuitive knowledge and divine intelligence. Vijaypaul7 (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanjaya 
Talk:Drupada

message: I have re-reverted the revert on on 21 Aug 2012 . Though the article may rely on primary refs/even unreliable refs, it is better than the unreferenced/incomplete status it was earlier. Most (if not all) of the facts stated in the article about Draupada are accurate. Not sure about names of sons, but everything else looks fine. Reliable references for these can be easily found.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  06:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts on 21 Aug 2012 
Talk:Charlie Haeger

message: "Garland was relieved by Haeger in the 5th inning, marking the first time in recent years that two knuckleballers have faced each other in the same game." Depending on the definition of recent years, Wakefield and Sparks definitely faced each other in game 4 of the 2003 divisional playoffs (http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/2003/B10050BOS2003.htm). And I suspect that Sparks also faced Wakefield many other times in his career as he was in the AL and pitched frequently.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.110.100 (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wakefield vs. Sparks
Talk:Ellis Spear

message: Strictly speaking, Lieutenant Melcher never claimed to have initiated the charge at Little Round Top; his story - that he asked permission to retrieve fallen wounded, was told that a charge was about to be ordered, and was the first company to set off - actually matches those of Colonel Chamberlain and several other officers, including the view from the Confederate lines and the wartime writing of Captain Spear himself.  Spear's writings (at least those from 1898 until his death) aren't corroboration for the claims about Melcher; they are, in fact, the source of those claims.  In fact, they're the only source.  This paragraph needs changing; objections?IcarusPhoenix (talk) 17:53, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Corroboration" of Melcher claims
Talk:Philip Rosedale

message: 4th Grader building a pc? ... either this guy is unbelivable bright or this information isnt what it implies(if u consider understanding of pc then similar like todays )
This article needs more info about Philip's education and skills 88.111.137.202 (talk) 14:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IQ? 

message: FreeVue is not the name of his company, but rather the name of the program that attracted RealNetworks' attention.
<http://www.inc.com/magazine/20070201/hidi-rosedale.html>
Is there any way that this could be clarified?
March 9, 2009
168.156.42.244 (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider it clarified. -- Eddy  (talk|contribs) 21:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FreeVue 

message: Considering the link to coffee and power appears to be dead and done, if anyone knows what he's doing these days, the article could use an update.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.169.0 (talk) 12:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Currency
Talk:Jeffers Petroglyphs

message: I added some public domain images, but I suspect some color images would be nice. (Mazzmn 04:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added those color pictures. Cheers! Gutworth 02:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Color Photos

message: I intend to add a section about "Starry Night, Prairie Night".  Every year there is a amateur astronomy gathering at the Jeffers Petroglyphs site during this event.  I'll reference the Jeffers website and the Yahoo Group MNAA.  Any issues/requirements? J3gum (talk) 05:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Starry Night, Prairie Night
Talk:Abraham Sutzkever

message: The article has an interwiki link to an article in German, but it leads nowhere. My preliminary search under alternate spellings in the German Wikipedia was fruitless (nor, for that matter, did I find any article in the Hebrew Wikipedia). I'd appreciate help in locating other Wikipedia articles on Abraham Sutzkever. Thanks, Deborahjay 03:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to the German artcle entitled "Abraham Sutzkever" now works. Davshul (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki link?

message: There are conflicting reports as to the date of death of Sutzkever, either January 19 or January 20. As currently stated in the article, and as reported by New York Times and Forward, as well as Haaretz (English), he died on (the morning of) January 20. According to certain articles in the Hebrew media, including Walla, as well as currently stated in eight of the nine Wikipedia articles in languages other than English, he died on January 19. The report in Hebrew in YNET dated January 20 states that he died "tonight" (הלילה). However, as such report appears to be timed at 11.31 a.m., "tonight" could presumably refer to the previous night (being the night when such report could have been written). Davshul (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would go with what the larger newspapers said: Morning of January 20. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 15:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: Poem 2601:1C0:6480:4E40:F5EB:6731:CD0F:D4BD (talk) 04:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What will remain
Talk:Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn/Bad Faith

message: Please note that it was user JMax555 who originally proposed that the HOGD pages be deleted from Wikipedia if that is the only way to stop the bickering. I agreed with him. Now his original comments have disappeared from this page, JMax555 has not voted on whether the pages should be deleted or not. Additionally, one of the HOGD, Trolls put a message in my talk saying tha Max was only quoting admin. This is obviously a clever set up in bad faith by JMax555 and his cohorts to make it look like those of us who do not accept their historical revisionism merely want to have the pages deleted. Come on HOGD, Inc. trolls. Show some good faith for a change, stop trying to create the illusion of consensus and seriously seek to work out a compromise.--Zanoni666 17:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Socks don't get to vote. Standard process on WP. You're saying that stuffing the ballot using socks is good faith? Got a mirror handy? Also, please see WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA, you can get blocked for personal attacks (i.e. calling people trolls)  -999 (Talk) 17:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: As 999 mentioned before, its pointless to vote on the deletion of the article. There are plenty of editors willing to contribute, and sources. Just because there is "bickering" doesnt mean that an article will be deleted. See the Christianity's talk page. There are tons of disputes. The article isnt about to be deleted, so I wouldnt worry too much about it. Lets get back to a compromise. Zos 17:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I indicated I would go along with the idea and not complain if it happened. That's still the case. But if it isn't going to happen, as seems to be the case, then the point is moot. - JMax555 22:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact, Zanoni666, YOU first proposed the idea, on this Talk page, on 22:50 12 June 2006: (quote)"The other alternative would be to toss everything having to do with the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn entirely off ow Wikipedia."(unquote) So, were you making that proposal in bad faith? Or were you just joking? - JMax555 22:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I am also not a troll, this is what bad faith is, Zanoni. One more personal attack and you are being reported. Zos 17:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I was actually refering to the admin-incidents/reports page where the subject of deletion was first brougt up, and it wasnt brought up by JMax. Also, calling me a troll (quoting me directly from your talk page, so you were talking about me) is bad faith, and is a personal attack. And who is using derogatory handle? If you are refering to me, check my user page, its in no way derogatory. Zos 19:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Faith, Survey Invalid, Shows No Consensus due to Bad Fatih
Talk:Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn/Whining

message: The admins told you to take it to mediation. This is not mediation. You're making a nuisance of yourself, please see WP:DISRUPT and dispute resolution for the standard processes for how to proceed. Violating WP:POINT is not a suitable way of resolving disputes. -999 (Talk) 22:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mediator will be here tomorrow. I want him to see this information. You do not have the right to remove it until the mediator gets here. It is important background information for mediation for them to see what is happenning. Are you not man enough to stand behind what you all have been doing, 999? --Zanoni666 23:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Correction, I have never been blocked for a 3rr violation. That statement is libelous. Get your facts straight before you make any further libleous statements, please. Don't worry, I have copies of the evidence that you are attempting to cover-up through repeated improper deletion and it will be presented to the mediator. You are not getting off that easy. If you are so confident that you did nothing wrong then why delete the evidence repeatedly?--Zanoni666 23:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Zanoni666, "libelous" is a legal term. Are your threatening to try to sue User 999 for libel? See Wikipedia: No Legal Threats.- JMax555 00:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNN -999 (Talk) 01:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy of whining complaints from admin page removed
Talk:Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz

message: Actually, Marcinkiewicz remains in office also after his formal resignation, until the next cabinet is sworn in. Therefore, I wouldn't state his term end as 10th July. Also, Jarosław has not become Prime Minister today, but official candidate for PM - he has to assemble a cabinet and get a confidence vote to be sworn in - only then is he legally a PM. Bravada, talk - 15:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term end date 