lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:David Cain (professor)

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:36, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've suggested that the book's topic be moved to this one, as the book is apparently not notable enough for its own article here. -- Mikeblas (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:C. I. Defontenay

message: Much cuter deal representing science fiction stub. The other one was kind of weird.(On book spines at American libraries the planet Saturn represents science fiction, and this sort of looks similar in least).--T. Anthony 09:39, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trevor and Simon

message: Didn't they release a single with Donovan, a cover of I Love my Shirt? -Mongreilf
:It was a version of Jennifer Juniper. -Bonalaw 11:24, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But I Love my Shirt was on the B side.--Mongreilf 14:01, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not on my copy... the B side was the wonderfully derivative Geraldine Tangerine. Slovakia 19:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The opening states that they were a comedy duo. However, the article goes on to talk about their recent collaborations. Thus is it correct to state that their partnership is defunct? Bob talk 13:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They certainly appear to be still performing together, even if it's only now and again. Anyway, i've changed it to read 'are' instead of 'were'. Dbam 15:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph 

message: "Trevor was a musician at the 2005 Glastonbury Festival ... with his band" - any idea what his band is/was called? This is worth putting in the article, surely?  Dom Kaos (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Trevor's band?
Talk:Commercial mortgage-backed security

message: There was no information here that related specifically to CMBS. All general information that was not yet in mortgage-backed security has been moved there. - DocendoDiscimus 09:49, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Not specifically to CMBS

message: Propose merging content from CMBS Prepayment Terms to this article - the topic does not seem so large as to justify sub-articles.Cander0000 (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 

message: i work in cmbs and the last line in the opening paragraph is incorrect.  the vast majority (~80%) of cmbs bonds pay interest at a fixed rate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.189.207.114 (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad info 
Talk:Gihon Spring

message: Inscription? --Wetman 09:57, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

message: dear yurik & all others,
the link in he SHOULD be to "Gihon Spring" in he. and not to "Gihon", as there exists an en. entry about "Gihon", which is something else, and it might exist someday in he.  .Shilonite 22:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: link to hebrew

message: Should "The city government of Jerusalem has proposed to restore the valley floor by replacing illegally built housing" be replaced by "Israeli occupation forces have proposed demolition of Palestinian housing, replacing"? How should this information be presented? User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The city government of Jerusalem has proposed to restore the valley floor by replacing illegally built housing

message: An article about a geophysical location does not need politically inspired adjectives to describe the organizations in charge of the location. The editors of this article choose to use "Israeli settler" to describe the character of the organization El Ad. I suggest the words be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Copytopic1 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it's a settler organisation: the source (an article from BBC News) describes it as follows, "The land here is privately owned by Elad, an Israeli association that also funds Jewish settlement building across occupied East Jerusalem."  Our own article on Ir David Foundation indicates the activities of this organisation in East Jerusalem (itself an interesting article for this discussion.  To attempt to soft-pedal (or indeed obscure) this aspect is no less political than to present it.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settler 

message: This sentence, I find to be misinformed:
:``The spring is under the control of the Israeli settler organization Ir David Foundation ("El'ad");[3]``
The owners of the the Gishon is "Israel Nature and Parks Authority" (INPA), which is a government agency run by the state to taka care of parks in Israel. ELAD is not the owner, but a foundation that runs the place in the name of INPA. This is the page in INPA site, regarding city of david park (where the Gishon is located)
Can I correct the sentence? Talyaron (talk) 12:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to make the sentence more precise, but first you need a better source.  The web page you cite does not contain what you say.  It would be nice to carefully distinguish between (1) who owns the land, (2) who has authority over the running of the site, (3) who manages the site.  If you can find a good source spelling out those things, it would be great. Zerotalk 12:44, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting misinformation regarding wonership
Talk:Pandora (moon)

message: The NASA moons profile site gives two sets of diameters on the same page: these, and 114x84x62. Could someone with access to better data verify? kwami 09:57, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 
Talk:Prometheus (moon)

message: The NASA moons profile site gives two sets of diameters on the same page: these, and 145x85x62 km. Could someone verify which is more up to date? kwami 09:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Diameter

message: A great movie from NASA: . Can someone convert it to a form we can upload? kwami (talk) 05:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  movie 

message: I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Wikipedia recording 

message: "Seat thyself sultanically among the moons of Saturn, and take high abstracted man alone; and he seems a wonder, a grandeur, and a woe. But from the same point, take mankind in mass, and for the most part, they seem a mob of unnecessary duplicates, both contemporary and hereditary" - Hermann Melville, Moby Dick  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.108.182 (talk) 02:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moby Dick 
Talk:Chapman's Peak

message: Union of South Africa? --Wetman 10:00, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Inventive step and non-obviousness

message: The following material has been excised from patent, we may wish to include it here. Kcordina  Talk  09:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary material 

message: The reference to the Smuckers case needs to be dated, not just labeled "recent". --Shawn K. Quinn 22:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (didn't notice at first that the reference had the dates in it). If I made mistakes let me know. --Shawn K. Quinn 22:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smuckers peanut butter and jelly sandwich case 

message: This is a very poor and amateurish article that does no credit to Wikiprdia. It needs an enormous amount of cleanup, Cn fixing, and putting into NPOV. It clearly has not been written by a person with familiarity with the subject it addresses. Will someone knowledgeable volunteer to improve this ardticle? PraeceptorIP (talk) 19:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article 

message: The section about the U.S. is too long and detailed. It should be split IMHO. The new article could be named Non-obviousness in United States patent law. Any objections? --Edcolins (talk) 12:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the splitting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walter Tau (talk • contribs) 13:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

text: Pinging  - It's been almost 4 years since this was proposed. Would you like to perform a split? I can if you don't want to. Wgullyn (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for your message. I am still in favour of the split. I would be more than happy if you do it. --Edcolins (talk) 09:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed
Talk:Pieter Cramer

message: Technical point Cramer named many species but did little to organis (classify) them. Notafly
:We who have to put names on butterflies still use Cramer's 1770s publications. We should push for somebody or some organization to digitalize the entire work and "put" it on the internet. It is our collective heritage. Luckily, the museum where I work has a full original copy. --Wloveral (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A fully illustrated online version of the original publication is something that is long past due!  I have seen a few parts of it, but can't research anymore of it without travelling halfway across the world.  HaarFager (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I hope I solved your problem with the text.Taksen (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Exotic" works well and explains the context of the usage of "outlandish" quite well.  Thanks!  HaarFager (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk
Talk:Children Act 1989

message: I've been contemplating this page for a while now.  Clearly it needs reference to the paramountcy of welfare, delay principle, no order principle and welfare checklist.  My problem is where to go as regards section 8 orders.  Contact and even more so residence are already covered, but nothing on Specific Issue or Prohibited Steps.  What I'm looking for is some ideas as to how to structure the content of the page(s) in the most logical way.  Is it wise to duplicate content?
Jim Conduit 19:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello,
I am in the process of trying to re-write this article and would appreciate any help! Please have a nosy at my sandbox and let me know what you think. I realise this is going to be a huge article and I want to make sure its in the most user friendly format. Please let me know if you can help or think there is anything that really needs to go into it.
Thanks very much, Staceydolxx (talk) 14:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  After discovering most of the text was copied from law firm websites; I decided to speed up my process of re-writing this article. It will take me some time to complete it and I am still looking for some help! If there is anything in the article that is missing that people think urgently needs to go in; let me know! Thanks =) Staceydolxx (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-writing - Help needed 

message: I have added an info box to the article but I am not sure if this is completed properly. If anyone can have a look it would be much appreciated Staceydolxx (talk) 13:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Is there something missing before "become"?  Eric Corbett 11:41, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's meant to be "that becomes", but I've rephrased a bit. Does it make any more sense now? WormTT(talk) 11:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I understand what it's saying now.  Eric Corbett 12:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't understand this 

message: This article reads like an advertisement. Added template. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be removing that template as I strongly disagree that it reads as an advertisement!? How can something appear to be advertising an piece of legislation? - It is factual and uses no opinionated language that I can see? If you disagree with me please do explain and I will try to change the areas you have issue with ツStacey (talk) 10:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I just assessed this for WikiProject Social Work, and the description of the law's contents looks pretty good to me. However, this article is sorely lacking perspectives on the law. Who was for it and who was against it and why? What unintended consequences has it had? What laws have since modified it, and what problems were they intended to solve? Sondra.kinsey (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perspectives Needed
Talk:Gulf of Piran

message: See: Talk:Croatia–Slovenia border disputes/Archive 1 --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute talk archive

message: Could it be . . . a MAP? 50.193.171.69 (talk) 20:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmmmm, something seems to be missing . . .
Talk:Kangaroo paw

message: The image on the page is a propogated hybrid and is not the natural Kangaroo paw
The natural kangaroo paw has a single flower on each stem and the stem is also coloured the same as the flower
Gnangarra 10:39, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know how the Kangaroo Paw, Salt Bush, and the Sturt's Desert Pea have managed to adapt to their particular desert environment.
Thanking you in advance....
:Kangaroo Paw doesnt grow in a desert enviroment it native only to SW of WA Gnangarra 10:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  habitat.. 

message: I think it better to merge the unique facts in this article to the genus Anigozanthus, leaving a dab for the species which are separated from the catspaws of the same genus (citing Hopper). ~ cygnis insignis 13:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Talk:Tassili n'Ajjer

message: I've added an English-to-Arabic transliteration of Tassili n'Ajjer, but I have yet to add the šaddas for the double-consonants.  I'm leaving this tag here until someone who is native in Arabic can verify.  --chris 19:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The art has strong stylistic links to the pre-Nguni Art of South Africa and the region, executed in caves by the San Peoples before the year 1200 BC."
I thought (based on my readings) that the art found there is much older- more like 12000 BC rather than 1200 BC. Did you mean to say 12000? If not, can you provide some reference to that sentence ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.168.19.168 (talk) 14:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the art found there much older? 
Talk:Philip Howard Colomb

message: This needs some updating; in 1911 none of Colomb's ideas had been tested in battle; the modern view is that World War I found them wanting (cf The Rules of the Game: Jutland and British Naval Command by Andrew Gordon). There ought to be something here about his correspondence on the Victoria–Camperdown collision, in which he took the absurd view it was more important for the captain to obey orders than to save his ship. Gdr 11:25, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pragmatic Sanction of 1713

message: I am very confused by this article.  The first paragraph explains that Charles V split the Habsburg lands between Phillip II and Ferdinand I.  The second paragraph then immediately says "A succession crisis was clearly looming", refers to the upcoming death of Charles II, and talks about the "union of French and Spanish dominions".
Something is missing from the article and I don't know what that might be. Molinari 17:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, OK.  Looking at the article history I see that a paragraph explaining this was deleted by a vandal.  I have restored the paragraph. Molinari 18:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: ----
Are we sure that the pragmatic sanction occured in 1713? Everywhere else i have read has cited 1723 as the date...
Timfairclough (talk) 13:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pragmatic sanction 1713 or 1723? 

message: Are we sure that Frederick I of Prussia was involved with the Pragmatic Sanction, rather than Frederick William? Given that Frederick I died in February 1713 while the Charles only announced the edict in April 1713. 2404:8000:1002:B3A9:A5C7:33C0:F8CF:D7AB (talk) 23:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederick I
Talk:Salyut 1

message: The craft is described as being "99 m³ in interior space" and have "pressurized (100 m³ total)"
Can't have a bigger pressurized volume bigger than the ship itself.
Anyone with correct figures?
(Diego bf109 (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Im guessing two door airlock could cause this. But its just a guess with no idea what i am talking about. --Ssavilam (talk) 16:30, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2008
Talk:Amplified (Q-Tip album)

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. NME (Columnist. 29. January 10, 2000) review of Amplified (1999):
 
Dan56 (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NME review

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. 04.D. November 30, 1999) review of Amplified (1999):
Dan56 (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA Today review
Talk:Pope John II

message: This article is almost entirely completely copied from the Catholic Encyclopedia cf http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08421b.htm and is therefore plagiarism and needs to be rewritten (Boojie (talk) 07:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is his birth date indeed known as 470 or is it unknown? JMK (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date

message: Can someone provide a source for the claim that John II adopted a papal name that was different from his original name? The Liber Pontificalis merely calls him "IOHANNES qui et Mercurius" ("John also known as Mercurius"). The claim that he changed his name appears in the Catholic Encyclopedia without source. In the same article it is mentioned that the Basilica di San Clemente has memorials referring to him as "Johannes surnamed Mercurius". The Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century does not mention a name change. It merely refers to him as "Joannes II. (called Mercurius)". To me this all sounds like his name had always been John.
Random person no 362478479 (talk) 18:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papal Name? 

message: @GoodDay I reverted your addition of Saint to the honorific. I find no reliable source that refers to John II as a saint. I also removed List of catholic saints (which had already been there) from See also. If you have a source feel free to re-add the information with a reference. Random person no 362478479 (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. The see also list mislead me. GoodDay (talk) 23:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I assumed. I don't know why someone added that, I checked and John II is not on the list there. Random person no 362478479 (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sainthood
Talk:Felix Manz

message: *What is an "allegorical portrait"?  What makes it allegorical exactly?  Wickethewok 19:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: As a student of the Radical Reformation, it is quite interesting that it has taken hundreds of years for the evangelical church of Zurich to make a formal apology to the Anabaptist community. Does that mean that this church now accepts adult baptism as a legitimate form of baptism, or are they just apologising for murdering people for their beliefs. How deep is this apology? What now are they accepting about the Anabaptists, and in particular, are they now saying that Felix Manz was correct in his beliefs about baptism? or just that murdering someone for their religious convictions is contrary to Bible teaching?GlenninBerlin
:How about you ask THEM instead of just making empty and self-serving rhetorical gestures here? Dogface 12:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What specifically is this apology for?

message: The exact location was not clear and I have edited the text under the picture to make clear the exact location. I visited the site today.DigbyJames (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of memorial plaque 
Talk:Aida Fariscal

message: It's obvious that the writer is very impressed with Aida Fariscal but I don't think it's a neutrality issue. The problem is that parts of the article read more like a true crime novel than an encyclopedia. Just the facts ma'am.  --Calibas 05:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Good article that gives well deserved recognition to rare policwoman who was key to disrupting the plot that would become 9/11. Moved parts of story into Bojinka plot which previously gave no background at all. Bachcell (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article
Talk:Leo II (emperor)

message: An event in this article is a February 9 selected anniversary
The "selected anniversaries" section of the Wikipedia home page today says: As the seven-year old Leo II was deemed too young to rule, his father Zeno was crowned as the co-emperor of the Byzantine Empire. But this article says nothing about any such thing, only that Leo II was the emperor from January until November. If his father really was crowned in his place, this article ought to mention it. - Brian Kendig 04:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it does say Zeno ruled as regent. Perhaps it needs to be clarified, but it is there. Adam Bishop 06:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Was Zeno the regent, or the co-emperor? - Brian Kendig 14:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox says he became emperor on January 18, but the article text says January 19. As all the sources are offline, I can't check it for myself. —howcheng  {chat} 07:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to have been  awhile ago. Johnson524 (Talk!) 14:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  18th or 19th
Talk:Guadalcanal campaign

message: As stated at the top of the edit screen, this article uses d-m-y format for dates.  So do the other articles in the Featured Topic suite of articles (of which this is the lead); so do other articles on US military battles and campaigns (as that is the format used by the US Armed Forces).  It is also the format used in the Anglosphere outside the US.  Kablammo (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the changes. One of the functions of the template is to stop changes from one style to another, how that plays out is arbitrary and unsatisfactory. One subproject's style may conflict with another, so not an argument either way, but stability is preferred. cygnis insignis 17:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date format 

message: I see many citations to the writing of an author named "Frank". Somehow, I fail to find the actual complete citation. It would be useful if some editor would find the complete citation and then enter it appropriately. Pete unseth (talk) 21:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication by "Frank" 

message: In the losses box it is reported 2 fleet carrier lost, but in the order of battle, of the three carriers involved (Saratoga, Wasp an Enterprise) only Wasp was sunk. Saratoga was torpedoed but not sunk, making it kind of “wounded”. Shouldn’t the box be corrected? 2001:B07:A3B:5C48:E499:9284:9427:CDFE (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA naval losses