lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mount Carmel Junction, Utah

message: Nice Rock Church picture!  Ratagonia 14:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who the heck is Jack Morrison? Is he the only person who ever settled in Mount Carmel Junction? Written like a magazine article or a story. Missing information. No citations. Should be a separate article, if it has sufficient notability. 
Bleakcomb (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Settlement of Mount Carmel Junction

message: This section also needs much work.  It is not cited properly and goes into inappropriate detail for this article. Wilson44691 (talk) 12:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology 

message: No Halloween cupcakes for you! Tylas   ✫   ♥♫ 18:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom
Talk:Milwaukee Chicks

message: I've seen multiple reports that Casey Stengel managed the Chicks.  I know that he was also skipper of the Brewers at the time, and presume that his role with the Chicks was largely ceremonial.  Can anybody verify?  --Chancemichaels 14:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who managed the Chicks?
Talk:Juliette Bonkoungou

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  JubalHarshaw 14:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very useful, thanks. It was I who tagged the article as in need of clean-up after translation and I have put a note on that page. Itsmejudith 15:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did minor grammar and punctuation changes in the sentence which was in the original "To her many people when they hear Africa automatically thinks about war and famine". Coppertwig 23:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you very much for this helpful edit, cleaning a sentence I missed. Itsmejudith 12:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

message: This is about tag cleanup.  As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, or perhaps there is a consensus on the discussion page, they will be removed.  This is not a judgement of content.  If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made. Do not undo this edit, but put a new tag and new comments so it will have a current date. This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk) 22:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. I don't think the article still needs a tag. Itsmejudith (talk) 23:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:Symphony No. 14 (Mozart)

message: VFD 70.34.12.10 (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is not much content in this article to cite.  Many of these classical stubs are just movement listings that you can get from the CD booklet that comes with a recording of the piece.  I'm not the creator of this page, but is there a standard source we should be citing for these types of classical stubs?  Here is the allmusic.com entry: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&token=&sql=42:51612 . DavidRF 14:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Vought OS2U Kingfisher

message: I hesitated to add that the USS Alabama Kingfisher came from Mexico since that fact was only from my memory. But, this website seems to corroborate this: http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Fea1/701-800/Fea744_Kingfisher_Pliopas/00.shtm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpnew (talk • contribs) 13:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the following text (quote)It has since been relocated to the Museo del Aire in Havana http://www.airteamimages.com/52358.html Photograph of the Cuban Kingfisher at the Museo del Aire, Havana(unquote). The reference image looks correct for the Museum of the Revolution, so I believe it is simply mis-captioned. There is no other evidence of it at the Museo del Aire.PeterWD (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivors 

message: The plane was a US plane serving in the Navy with the designation OS2U, OS- being a mission prefix for Observation-Scout. The British at the time named all their planes (typhoon, swordfish, hurricane, firefly, etc, etc) and they called this plane the Kingfisher. So there is no such thing as the "OS2U Kingfisher" it is either the US plane OS2U or the British plane Kingfisher. This fact is reflected correctly in the Variants section.
Since this is a US made plane and a larger number served with the designation OS2U than the British navy exclusive Kingfisher the whole article and the title should be changed to reflect this (add a redirect article with the title Vought Kingfisher maybe).
I have never contributed to this article so I don't feel bold enough to do such a large re-edit, but I hope those who contribute regularly take my point into serious consideration. --DelftUser (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Any idea why some us navy sources call it a Kingfisher? like  MilborneOne (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

text: Or the Smithsionian  or the United States Coast Guard  MilborneOne (talk) 13:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming mess - No such thing as 'OS2U Kingfisher' 

message: https://web.archive.org/web/20081120194959/http://www.ussessexcv9.org/Bravepages/icecream.html is an interesting story about a U.S. airman downed by AA while attacking Okinawa. An OS2U picks him up.
While it's a single and first hand account aspects that could be added to this article are:
* That the engine was started with a cartridge.
* Difficulty when taking off from a flat sea.
* That the host ship makes a turn immediately prior to landing to create a flat area in the water.
* That the host ship has a net deployed over the side and is dragged through the water. The OS2U runs up to the net and then stops.  They attach the crane and the aircraft is hoisted back onto the catapult.
* An airman is worth ten gallons of ice cream. :-)
--Marc Kupper|talk 10:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of a OS2U during a rescue
Talk:IAI RQ-5 Hunter

message: * current generation of aircraft is MQ-5B Hunter, can we change the page name? Clown (talk) 05:21, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following links are cited in support of the claim:
*
*
Both mention Rostec as the source of the claim. The first source makes no mention of any comment by the United States, but says that the photo provided by the source shows a drone in flight, rather than debris. The second source states that there is no confirmation from the United States or any independent source.
This link, not cited in the article, supports the claim, claiming that the 66th Military Intelligence Brigade had been operating 18 drones from Kirovohrad
This link, not cited in the article, quotes US defence officials as denying that a drone was intercepted.
Likewise, this link, which goes further and states that no US drones of any kind are flying over Crimea. Autarch (talk) 16:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged Crimean incident 
Talk:Vought SB2U Vindicator

message: Was the XSB3U-1 a variant of the F3U? I have removed the link until this is confirmed. Drutt (talk) 13:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

message: The number built has been corrected to 244 which includes 24 for the French can I just note that I have a ref that 40 were built for the French, the 24 were the ones that entered service, that would make it 260 built. Anybody have any other sources for the French build number, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have two sources (the Air Enthusiast article used already and a 2000 article in the same magazine that state that not only were all 40 French V-156Fs were built, but all 40 were delivered as well, the first 20 in 1939 and the second 20 in early 1940.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Nigel I have updated the page to 260 and tweaked the French total. MilborneOne (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Number built
Talk:Ryo Mashiba

message: This page was created to allow editors to add information about the character Ryo Mashiba from the Fighting Spirit (Hajime no Ippo) series because the main article had gotten to be too big. To any editors that contributed to the Ryo Mashiba character section of the Fighting Spirit article, please transfer over any unnecessary information from that article into this article. Guyinblack25 14:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About this page
Talk:Thorp T-18

message: Please provide evidence that Thorp invented the stabilator. --Coosbane (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Invented the stabilator?

message: Tail number N600HH crashed near airstrip MU89 near Wright City, Missouri on 07 FEB 2017. The registered owner of the plane and the airstrip is Mike R. Fleming. The plane is a write-off. The pilot walked away with a broken arm. Source The plane was a base T-18 with a Lycoming O-320 engine. — Reverend Lee (talk • contribs) 07:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Crash of N600HH on 07 FEB 2017
Talk:William Emerson Ritter

message: My main purpose in adding the  tag was to get the references in a proper format.  Right now, all I see are a bunch of non-superscripted numerals scattered throughout the text, and a numbered list of references at the bottom.  It's not clear that they're supposed to be connected.  Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for details on how to cite sources properly.  Powers T 14:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference style
Talk:Tiger Aircraft

message: This article on Tiger aircraft contains a section on True Flight, the company that has purchased the assets of Tiger Aircraft following its bankruptcy. My own opinion is that True Flight should remain a part of this article until they make a certification milestone, such as getting a production certificate. At that point I think they should have their own article. If the company does not proceed to at least that stage it would probably best remain as a section in this article, as I don't believe it would justify its own article. - Ahunt (talk) 13:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: True Flight Holdings LLC

message: I have recently asked this user to please stop removing accurate and properly referenced content from this article. For the third time I have restored content that he has deleted on the purchase of Tiger Aircraft by True Flight. After three deletions I can only assume that this user is in a Conflict of Interest, is somehow associated with True Flight and is trying to control how their story is presented in Wikipedia. I have asked this user on his talk page that if I am not correct in this assumption then he should feel free to explain why he keeps deleting this information. - Ahunt (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Content by [[User:Tigerflier]]
Talk:Josep Irla

message: I was adding languages for the external links section of this article (like  for  and  for ), but I could not add Galician because I do not know the correct template for it. If you do no please add it to the external link marked "Parlament de Catalunya - Josep Irla".  Liam987 16:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages for external links 
Talk:Tupolev Tu-107

message: My source is the red star book #35, RGDS Alexmcfire  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmcfire (talk • contribs) 03:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tupolev Tu-204

message: "comfortable illumination", reads like advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.252.87.140 (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  newer russian aircraft articles look a bit advertising 

message: I would like to ask if we could change the main image to this?
It has a better angle and you can see the plane from a front-side view which is fantasitc, Ill be honest after seeing the image above, only now can I admire the aircraft. The current image isnt good as you cant see much of it. 
OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 12:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Red Wing image is good but the existing Russian Air Force image is better IMHO. - Samf4u (talk)  13:51, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

text: I like the view of the whole wing with the prominent winglets. Again, this just my opinion. - Samf4u (talk)  16:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

text: Nope, I've never done that. I'm sure it could be done. - Samf4u (talk)  16:48, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

text: My preference would be the Red Wings picture above; my personal preference is that style of shot rather than an almost "overhead" shot. Just my opinion though, I'm sure others will disagree. Garretka (talk) 19:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

text: I think the red wings image is the more natural pose for an airliner, the actual operator is not really relevant. MilborneOne (talk) 07:59, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Image Change
Talk:Tupolev Tu-334

message: How can this aircraft programme have been cancelled in 2009 and yet still be in production? 94.125.16.11 (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess all those "firm" orders weren't so firm.172.191.49.12 (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status 

message: Seems a bit silly to have a separate article for a variant, even if it has a new designation.--Petebutt (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Prayers for the Assassin

message: I'm really uncomfortable with all the review excerts lined up like the blurb material on a bookjacket (if that's not indeed where they are from).  Somebody seems to be verging on full-blown advertising here. --Orange Mike 15:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: So... why is this silly book notable exactly? Is it because it is the only book that has ever had Israel nuke New York as part of its story? TheArchaeologist (talk) 02:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Joseph A. Shakspeare

message: Has anyone found a source for Shakspeare's middle name? It suggest a family name, but I can't find one. Anzoátegui State is in Venezuela, named after the hero of independence, José Antonio Anzoátegui (1789–1819). Parkwells (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Name origin?
Talk:VEF I-16

message: The top speed altitude is obviously wrong. The full throttle altitude of Walter Sagitta ISR was 3800m, so realistically the top speed has to be around that altitude too. I'd say it's a typo in the original source and it should be 3900m, definitely not 7900m, that's nearly the practical ceiling of the airplane.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.183.189 (talk) 13:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top speed altitude
Talk:1996–97 FA Premier League

message: Of all the seasons I've re-written, this one had the most excessive information that didn't belong in the article - namely all the material not relating directly to the Premiership season (e.g. League Cup results, excessive details on Man U's play/signings/etc over the season). As far as I can tell most of the relevant information is at 1996-97 in English football anyway, but if anyone feels I've missed anything you can use the page history to retrieve the info, or contact me and I'll do it. Cheers. QmunkE 15:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Van's Aircraft

message: To complete last edit by Arpingstone of the gallery photo captions, I have created redirects for RV-4, RV-8 and RV-10 to eliminate the redlinks - Ahunt (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery caption links
Talk:Lunar Jim

message: The article states that this show first aired in 2003, yet the episodes do not seem to begin until 2006.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.232.48 (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error. 
Talk:Vickers Vanguard

message: There are a lot of speed claims in this article for a plane that is still slower than a Lockheed_L-188_Electra.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattclare (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the Viscount and Vanguard would maintain height lightly-loaded on one engine, and fly quite well otherwise on two - BEA Viscount with two engines feathered here :  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.205.73 (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Viscount was certificated to be able to maintain height at it's maximum gross weight on any two engines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.220.123 (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
File talk:Yellow mite (Tydeidae) Lorryia formosa 2 edit.jpg

message: this is a false colour image, that should be mentioned somewhere —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.80.113.51 (talk • contribs).
:Duh. It's Scanning electron micrograph. Obviously photoshop is required to improve quality. 194.46.254.166 18:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Oxford, Michigan

message: The lead claims Oxford is a sister city of Oxford, UK, but the Brits don't seem to be aware of this: http://web.archive.org/web/20130817150811/http://oxford.gov.uk/PageRender/decAC/Town_twinning_occw.htm It seems unlikely given the disparity in size, the UK Oxford being a city of 150,000. I'm going to mark the claim as dubious. --Ef80 (talk) 22:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Oxford, MI claims to be a sister city of Oxford, UK. There is a sign saying this on the way into town Google Street View. I agree that it is incorrect for the article to claim that Oxford, MI is a sister city of Oxford, UK, but it is accurate for it to say that the village claims this. I will update the article. If I can find the time I will talk to the village government about the basis of this claim.Molinari (talk) 18:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

text: It is 100% incorrect the Oxford Michigan is not the sister city to Oxford in the UK . It's just to give the yuppies something to wrongly talk about and feel like someone other than what they really are. Good Grief !!!! 2600:6C48:437F:C153:B026:A561:A148:972 (talk) 23:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister city
Talk:Vickers Vimy

message: The Vickers Vimy looks like Sikorsky's 1913 bombers (S-21, S-22).  Maybe Sikosky was also working of an even earlier design.  Anyone know the history of these large planes.  DonPMitchell (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bomber designs 

message: That this is named after?
Wschart (talk) 03:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: From the article, "The type had received the official name of Vimy, after the Battle of Vimy Ridge."  Stepho  talk  08:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See Battle of Vimy Ridge. BilCat (talk) 09:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks 
Wschart (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell is a Vimy?
Talk:Vickers Virginia

message: The text states that the Virginia X was designed in 1924, but one of the photo captions claims that the depicted aircraft is a Virginia X photographed in 1922.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:92E0:171F:8D5B:9F32:5759:668 (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information
Talk:Vickers Warwick

message: Contrary to popular belief the warwick actually pre-dates the wellington, but only just as they were designed concurrently to two different specifications. The true progenitor of both designs is the Vickers B.9/32 prototype which also spawned the Wellesley. I can't actually put this in the article as I don't have my reference sources with me, so if any body feels like doing a little reading Get Vickers aircraft since 1908.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petebutt (talk • contribs) 18:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It sort of says this at the moment - it says the Wellington and Warwick were designed in parallel. As you say, both were derived from the Vickers Type 271 (i.e. the B9/32) (which is covered in the Wellington Article) with the Wellington being the definative B9/32 design and the Warwick meeting B1/35. What I can't find any references for is the statement that prototypes were cancelled in 1936 due to a decision to switch to 4 engined bombers (which is why I tagged it).Nigel Ish (talk) 19:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The B.1/35 Warwick design was started first as a complete re-design of the Vickers Type 271 that had been built to B.9/32 using 2,000 hp engines that were expected to become available, and the Wellington was then designed as a smaller version of the Warwick to fit and be re-submitted for specification B.9/32, and which flew earlier because it was designed to use already existing ~1,000 hp engines. The Warwick's 2,000 hp engines (Vulture, Sabre, Centaurus) were then delayed by the start of the war in 1939. By the time these engines were developed enough to be usable, around 1942, the Air Ministry had already decided upon the Avro Lancaster.  Thus the Wellington was actually a scaled-down Warwick, and not the other way round.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.73 (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: developed from
Talk:Ferdinand Lop

message: This pages is a joke. People made joke about the name of this candidate, the political propositions here are not real, but jokes from people of that time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:8DEC:EFDB:C3B0:78B2 (talk) 10:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: French Wikipedia sure seems to think he was a real person, and its article has plenty of references: :fr:Ferdinand Lop.  If it's a hoax, it's clearly a notable hoax deserving of Wikipedia coverage. AnonMoos (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is only urban legend.
Talk:Vultee A-31 Vengeance

message: I would query the context of the quote from Peter Smith in "Jungle Dive Bombers at War". It seems he is talking about dive bombers in general and not about the Vultee Vengeance. He may be quite correct in his assessment but dive bombing was used by many different types and in fact, specialist dive bombers were phased out in favour of more flexible (if slightly less accurate) types, most of which were fighters. He might have been talking about the Vengeance but he could just as easily have been referring to the Hellcat.Flanker235 (talk) 12:47, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vengeance limitations? 

message: Text says that the Vengeance was designed with a zero-degree angle of incidence so that the wing produced no lift during a dive.  (At least that's the way I read it.)  Unless a wing was a flat, airfoil-less plate, the angle of incidence would have nothing to do with whether or not it produced lift.  An airfoil with a zero-degree angle of incidence would have a lift vector at a vertical 90 degrees to the aircraft's centerline, meaning that during a true vertical dive, the lift vector would be parallel to the ground.173.62.15.26 (talk) 00:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zero-lift angle of incidence
Talk:Vultee XA-41

message: There are some discrepancies between the article text and the list of specifications below. The tact say, the cockpit was 15 ft high, but the specifications indicate an aircraft heigt of only 13 ft 11 in. Under "Testing" the maximum speed is given with 354 mph, but the specifications say 363 mph. Can someone please verify these dates ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.132.159.169 (talk) 10:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specification Discrepancies
Talk:Ferenc Deák (politician)

message: Hello, I believe there should be a Hungarian IPA for pronouncing Ferenc Deák. 
If any Hungarian speakers could add this, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you for your time. R. J. Dockery (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name pronunciation
Talk:LWD Junak

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008