Talk:Pedro Arrupe

message: The intro says:
Pedro Arrupe (Nov. 14, 1907 - Feb. 5, 1991) was the twenty-eighth Father General (1965-83) of the Society of Jesus.
The section "Father General" says:
At the 31st General Congregation (GC 31) of the Society of Jesus in 1965 he was elected to be the order's twenty-eighth Father General. He served in that position from 1965 to 1981.
Which is it? Kurt Weber 18:57, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, the last section says he fell ill in 1981 but did not resign until 1983.  I've updated the part above to reflect that. Kurt Weber 19:01, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Father General" duration 

message: What on earth is this?--Tamas 23:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Complete nonsense as far as I can tell, added by User:4.245.227.113 in early November. This page is the only entry for those 'words' Google can find, so I'm for removing it, and some of the other detritus in that paragraph. nae'blis (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: rattay notsmiquon simnitay

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pedro Arrupe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100528155040/http://www.jcu.edu/arrupe/pedro.htm to http://www.jcu.edu/arrupe/pedro.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100326070907/http://bc.edu:80/offices/ministry/arrupe/pedro.html to http://www.bc.edu/offices/ministry/arrupe/pedro.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Rather than leaving these statements interminably with "citation needed" tags, I've moved them here until someone is motivated to research them out and see if they are worth pressing.
For the Jesuits to tie their work so explicitly to the promotion of justice was a very bold move [according to whom?], and some [who?] felt it overly politicized the Society. A critic outside the Jesuits said that "one Basque founded the Jesuits, another one is going to destroy them". [this quote needs a citation] 
The decree was so hotly debated that it was not voted on until the last day of the Congregation, March 7, 1975, when it was accepted after a period of intense discussion by an overwhelming majority of delegates. [citation needed]
Arrupe himself was even accused of leading the Jesuits astray.[Dead reference] The controversy led to the condemnation in the 1980s of liberation theology by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (future Pope Benedict XVI), then Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.(This question became more complex in the course of time and I suggest it would take more than this brief mention to sort it all out. Also, the above reference is dead.) Jzsj (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pedro Arrupe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725013909/http://www.arrupe.org/en/father_pedro.html to http://www.arrupe.org/en/father_pedro.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: After reading Malachi Martin's treatment of Arrupe's generalship (in his  best selling book, The Jesuits), I was curious to read more about him.  In contrast to Martin's critical scrutiny of his leadership of the Jesuits, this article reads like hagiography.  Is there no room for controversy or criticism, here?  Or is Martin's book on the Jesuits widely considered to be false or grossly misleading?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.13.40.64 (talk) 15:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea how Fr. Martin's book has been received and evaluated, over the years, but it certainly is a fascinating read.  A summary of his critique of Fr. Arrupe's leadership can be found on pages 476-481 of The Jesuits. Hazratio (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

text: au contraire, @Hazratio, you are the one who buries the discussion. It is Wikipedia custom to add new discussions to the bottom of talk pages. If your newly-started discussion remains at the top, nobody will see it! Elizium23 (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies--the opposite would seem more reasonable to me, but I see now that the dates of the comments do begin with the oldest first and the newer ones at the bottom.  Thanks... Hazratio (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy and Criticism