lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Newcastle

message: make disambiguation.--cj | talk 07:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I notice this is and old, finished debate, but not be a troll, I would like to open a new one. There is a 3rd Newcastle which can reasonably assert equal - importance, viz. Newcastle, KwaZulu-Natal, as it has similar population of around 200000, but the actual article is at the moment quite shoddy. Reliable population data for South African cities is really hard to find, the Wikipedia article List_of_largest_cities_in_South_Africa_by_population is absolute nonsense (IMHO) as it contradicts in a major way every other population source, you would care to look at. This website  gives the population as 220,000 comparable to the 260,000 and 290,000 given on the articles for Newcastle, England; and Newcastle, Australia. Online, you will most likely not find nearly as much simply because mostly people are poorer and thus less-represented on the internet; this does not make the city any less notable. 198.54.202.242 (talk) 10:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd contender

message: I think it would be helpful if this page actually prioritised the Newcastles that people are more likely to be searching for... which used to be the case, but it seems that the unremitting "first amongst Newcastles" squabbling by certain parties (such as this edit) aren't really helping, nor adding anything of value to the page.  Anyway, given that I've stated that I've retired from Wikipedia, I'll let someone else sort it out. :P
--—Chris (blather • contribs) 23:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah its a lot of messing about to get to the proper things. I'm gonna put a note at the top. - Yorkshirian (talk) 02:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unhelpful layout

message: mind adding them? seems a "tiny" bit relevant and it is a common abbreviationproof: http://www.goal.com/en/results-standings/64/premier-league/table  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.147.10.35 (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Added as part of a new Sport section Simon Brady (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  newcastle united
Talk:Karna

message: change
Karna joined the Duryodhana's side in the Kurukshetra war. He was a key warrior who aimed to kill 3rd Pandava Arjuna but dies in a battle with him during the war.
to
Karna joined Duryodhana's side in the Kurukshetra war. He was a key warrior who aimed to kill the third Pandava, Arjuna, but he died in a battle with him during the war.
GrandEscogriffe (talk) 12:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Page was protected almost 4 years (mainly socking). Will ask the protecting admin if reducing the level may be appropriate. SWinxy (talk) 03:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Killed through deceit. 122.50.210.215 (talk) 03:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 July 2022 

message: Many things are written wrong about,especially his battles.
He is shown as 3rd rate warrior but in reality he greatest of all warriors, it is like people are degrading his image by spreading false rumours. 122.50.210.114 (talk) 02:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DreamRimmer (talk) 03:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 May 2023 

message: "Pre-marital" to Immaculate or Devine since due to naivety of childhood, Kunti tested the veracity of Suryadev of the boon, one that was indeed a boon granted upon a wish. 2600:1700:7A3A:220:C3F:5B88:64CC:9A51 (talk) 03:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Societal outrage would have been caused by a perceived premarital pregnancy, no matter its actual origins. Actualcpscm (talk) 08:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 June 2023 

message: 24.138.16.116 (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 July 2023 

message: Please add the following
 ==See also==
 * Yuyutsu, a kaurava brother who fought on the side of pandavas 119.74.238.54 (talk) 12:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  You have not provided any reliable source for your suggested edit (establishing the relation between the two). Please read WP:RS, WP:V. The article states that Yuyutsu was a son of Dhritarashtra with Gandhari's maid! How is he related to this article! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 13:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 November 2023
Talk:Ghatotkacha

message: this is linked to by topic: cannibalism.  I don't see any evidence that it should, but don't know enough about the subject to be 100% sure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.1.193.62 (talk) 02:29, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: cannibalism

message: This article has obvious weasel words: "Modern historians" and so claims an authority that wikipedia doesnt really possess.
It's citation for Modern Historians is a tourism website.  This needs to be improved!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.94.183.156 (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: So if  the article is to be split, then I think the simple name 'Ghatotkacha' should rest with the son of Bhima. The king could have a title added; what would be correct here, king, raja, maharaja, emperor? Imc 09:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gupta ruler?--Dangerous-Boy 10:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm being WP:BOLD and making the change.  Cheers.  -- Samir   (the scope) धर्म  01:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names
Talk:Hidimbi

message: Asserting change by Subhasree. Hidimba is the correct name, not Hidimbi.  Long a for the sister, short a for the brother.
Suggest using Hidimbā  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilboox (talk • contribs) 09:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidimbi/Hidimba 

message: I am shaila khan ( HIDIMBA) 103.141.217.5 (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IBMb 

message: bhim wife hidimba father 2409:4081:1585:A85E:F4A2:3C6F:2F40:CDF1 (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  bhim wife hidimba father
Talk:Durvasa

message: Durvasa or Durvasas? in the original Sanskrit.
Imc 22:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: In the section 'Meeting with Ambarisha', there are two versions of the story given. One is according to Bhagavata purana, and the other is according to Siva purana. However for siva purana version, sources are not cited. Who ever has made this change, please respond by providing citations. Otherwise this can be removed.--రవిచంద్ర (talk) 11:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: About Siva purana
Talk:Institute for Creation Research

message: "A Visit to the Institute for Creation Research," cited in n. 60, is misattributed to Eugenie C. Scott. The author is Karen Bartelt, as noted at the bottom of the page on ncse.com. Glenn Branch (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello . The author has been updated. In the future, don't hesitate to do it yourself :-) --McSly (talk) 01:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misattribution in n. 60 

message: ICR has announced the death of CEO (sic) Henry M. Morris—son of founder Henry M. Morris—today, December 12, 2020. He had been scheduled to retire at the end of the month JohndanR (talk) 01:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a sentence on this, with the obit from ICR as a source. Grayfell (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry M. Morris III deceased, Dec. 2020
Talk:I Don't Want to Miss a Thing

message: Lonestar also did a version of this great song, as well. Also 1998, I believe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B84D:4C2:1521:92FD:F0B1:38A7 (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

message: This song may be quite popular and was developed by Touchstone, but how far does it go to consider itself "one of the greatest Disney songs"? When people think of the music of Disney, does Aerosmith really come into mind? Dustman15 (talk) 13:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Greatest Disney Song" 
Talk:Lolicon

message: Hi, I think some portions of the article should be looked over to ensure that opinions are afforded their due weight. The disparity in information is especially noticeable in the "Critical commentary" section, in which Kimio Itō, Kinsella, Chizuko Naitō, and Christine Yano's work is contained in a single (short) paragraph. The next paragraph is solely dedicated to an alternate interpretation of filmmaker Miyazaki's rejection of lolicon, that suggests that he actually DOES like lolicon. These paragraphs are similar in length.
Since most/all of the sources not given sufficient detail in the article seem to be the ones criticizing lolicon, the neutrality of the article is a bit questionable. This can easily be fixed by expanding on those sources and balancing the content. FlookieBee (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this, there is clearly some bias here since, specially since someone change "associated with unrealistic and stylized imagery" (which is the most accurate description) to just "associated mainly with stylized imagery" which is missing the important part of unrealistic as most anime is, there are more changes that were made that are trying to subtly paint an incorrect image, they also removed the "moral panic" that very much happened in 1990s about "harmful manga" removing it is nonsensical since TO THIS DAY there's still a moral panic over these genres and this clear biased change is evidence of it. Hopefull Innformer (talk) 22:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

text: I have removed the paragraph on Miyazaki, which is indeed tangential to the topic. Regarding the broader point of neutrality, I believe the current "Analysis" section is a fairly good review of the scholarship as it stands. There is an argument to be made that it leans too heavily on Galbraith and sources derived from his work, and for balance I support the addition of more analysis in the vein of the last paragraph, if it can be found. Regarding the changes I made to the lead section, as discussed by the editor above, I believe they make the lead read more neutrally: "stylized" is agreed upon by all commentators, while the aspect of "unreality" is discussed from various perspectives in the article; stating the phrase's "common meaning" outside of the subsequent/specific otaku context, as explained in the body, is important; and not using the charged term "moral panic" is an improvement. — Goszei (talk)  03:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance information to maintain neutral tone
Talk:Division of Denison (state)

message: I think that we should be merging the Tasmanian electorate articles with the Federal electorate articles. Since Tasmanian electoral boundaries are simply a copy of federal electoral boundaries, and none of the articles are any more than stubs. I think it is of value to have federal and state electoral results listed together, particularly since geographical and demographic information is identical. Braue 07:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if the debate has already happened somewhere then I won't change it. Braue 00:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the Denison and Clark state articles be merged, as is the case for Braddon/Darwin and Lyons/Wilmot? AustralianSwingVoter (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have started a merge proposal in Talk:Division of Clark (state). Marcnut1996 (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Clark (state) article?
Talk:Dream On (Aerosmith song)

message: In 2016 Blacktop Mojo band released the cover.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.207.94 (talk) 23:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover by Blacktop Mojo

message: Eminem used sections in this song by permission in his song "Sing For The Moment"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.225.101.15 (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eminem 

message: What makes this song progressive? Aerosmith is not a progressive band, and this song is not progressive.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.200.150 (talk) 01:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progressive rock? 

message: that Buick commercial that was on last year?Ollie the Magic Skater 02:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this the song used in... 

message: Enigma does not have any album called Dream On. It's a bootleg, and the track called Dream On sung by Andru Donalds is included in it. Elandy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.231.36.192 (talk) 03:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enigma album? 

message: * there is a lot of youtube debate about this song.  does led zeppelin ever do a cover of this song?  you can't deny the strong zeppelin influenced vocals but i am not sure if zeppelin really has anything to do with this song.  thoughts? - platy nov 23  —Preceding comment was added at 00:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  led zeppelin 

message: Recently came across a movie which had this song sung by a female artist over the end credits. Came here trying to remember who sang it and which movie. Any ideas? 71.108.104.221 (talk) 06:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent cover in a movie 

message: Could You please add information when and on which record was released Ronnie James Dio/Yngwie Malmsteen/Stu Hamm/Gregg Bissonette/Paul Taylor vesion of "Dream On"?
SF  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.7.200.15 (talk) 21:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dio/Yngwie 

message: Nothing in this article is on why the song didn't chart in the British charts, and why it got released four times in the Netherlands (1973, 1976, 1991, 1996), in the two last occasions twice achieving a chart position. It is a popular song at funerals. It's in my will too. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 00:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside the western hemisphere
Talk:The Ashram (novel)

message: Putting this on the talk page as I'm cutting it out of the original article. Book reviews by non-notable reviewers do not typically belong in articlespace.
Judge's Commentary:
What did you like best about this book?
This is a compelling story on several levels - a cultural tale of traditional inequities and injustices (horrors, actually); an unfolding, very hopeful, slowly developing but deep love story, the blending of two cultures; an unexpected and inspiring spiritual journey for the protagonist and his love--the reader applauds the doctor's change, his awakening and dedication to his missions and his personal spiritual growth. These storylines are woven together in settings out of  a colorful travelogue on India, and mixed with fast paced action and adventure. The author's narrative prose and dialogue successfully move the story along, making this novel a real page-tuner. Mr. Memon has used his writing talents and Indian past to develop a rich substantive, interesting read.
On a personal level, this book offered me a fine preview of India, for my trip in February.
BinaryTed 00:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Order of battle of the Riverine Flotilla of the Polish Navy

message: The section Order of Battle of the Riverine Flotilla of the Polish Navy#Base says:-
:K 7 frogmen support vessel
Erh??? There were no frogmen before WWII, except in Italy, and those were a secret. Anthony Appleyard 07:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, the Polish Navy used scuba divers extensively. They were technicians and were to be able to repair the vessels in combat conditions, rather than to sink enemy vessels. However, all types are mentioned in the article on Frogman, so I don't see where's the fire. //Halibutt 11:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Frogmen before WWII?????
Talk:List of uniform polyhedra by Wythoff symbol

message: I like this attempt to group them, along with vertex figure page as well. My only concern is "too many copies" of data risks errors being introduced or not fully corrected if an error is found in one place.
Eventually when there's one article per uniform polyhedron, then a page like this can just link to the article and skip the data.
I wish we could just scan the list of uniform polyhedra table and create automatic stub articles. Apparently it can be done with some sort of script, but I don't have time (or apparent will) to see how. Tom Ruen 07:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If I were really here, I'd say this has great potential! Great start! I would wish a LIST of template objects could be declared in one place (file/article) for compactness, and referenced elsewhere. Tom Ruen 19:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Johnny O'Clock

message: I have removed the category Films set in New York City because it seems pretty clear the film was not set there. For example, the police are never identified as NYPD. The casino seems very fancy, not covert at all; were there ever casinos like that operating openly in New York City? While watching the film I thought it might be Los Angeles. The airport is identified as "Municipal Airport" as I recall, which in the 1940s did seem to be one name of Laguardia Airport, but overall it seemed the intention of the filmmakers was not to specify in which city the movie is set. However I'd be interested in hearing any opposing viewpoints. --Mathew5000 (talk) 08:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  In what city is the film set?
Talk:Birkenhead, South Australia

message: The Peninsula's Correct Name is <BR>
Lefevre Peninsuale  i.e. Lefevre as one word and lowercase f.<BR>
The name comes from Sir John G. Shaw-Lefevre
* SA State Library, Place Names of South Australia 
* Lefevre Peninsula Primary School
--DarkAxi0m (talk) 04:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected Name
Talk:Berber

message: Berber is the common English-language name, and is used as per WP:COMMONNAME. To change it, first present reliable sources that indicate that the scope of "Amazigh" is exactly the same as that of "Berber" and then develop a talk page consensus for change. Then changes would need to be made at each of the various articles, not first at this dab page. I have reverted the changes here. DES (talk) 18:33, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I want you to cite reliable English-language independent sources that say that the word "Amazigh" denotes the same people traditionally known in English as "Berbers". Then I want you to cite sources that show that the term "Amazigh" is actually used in reliable English-language sources in referring to this group with some frequency. Unless this is done, the names of Wikipedia articles are not likely to be changed as you wish, no matter how many people may try to insist on it. DES (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change of name 

message: To be clear, I'm not reading the sentence at MOS:DABNAME that begins "For short lists of name holders" as though this were preceded by "Now, ignore the previous sentence and, instead ...". I'm understanding that these sublists are of names that conform to the first sentence. Largoplazo (talk) 10:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surnames 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Berber (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Berber (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 15:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Berber (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:White City railway station

message: I added the statement that the station was named after the White City amusement park, based on this:
 "There is a White City, ex-amusement Park in three other cities namely 
 London, Sydney NSW and my hometown, Melbourne,VIC. Each of these is a 
 former suburb.", found here.
From this, I consider it very likely that the station was proximate to the White City amusement park and named for this reason, although I'm not absolutely sure. If anyone knows for sure they can confirm or delete the statement. Herostratus 08:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found nothing of the sort when I was writing the article, and a brief search just then found only references to the park at Rushcutters Bay. I'm not convinced there even was one in Melbourne, and if so, that it was anywhere near this rather industrial suburban area. Ambi 11:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of name
Talk:Robert Schumann

message: Three of the references cited for the paragraph on auditory hallucinations/hearing a single note did not mention hallucination or tinnitus but only discussed the bipolar theory and emotional disturbance. One mentioned Schumann only in passing. Removed source that did not discuss Schumann and moved the other two sources to cite statement in previous paragraph about Schumann possibly having bipolar disorder. Also added missing archive url and fixed formatting. Livin270 (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info for 21 October 2021 edit, "Adjusted sources for auditory hallucination" 

message: I would argue Dichterliebe should be included here. 139.60.27.38 (talk) 03:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best known works
Template talk:Carolingians

message: I think the template is only confusing and uninfomative.  The dates separated by slashes and the use of "Arnulf of Metz" and "After the Treaty of Verdun (843)" as headings like the other two are a little confusing and do not look good.  Furthermore, you stated after your revert of my edits that Pepin of Landen and Grimoald the Elder were considered part of the wider family of Pippinids or Arnulfings.  They were not Arnulfings.  They may be Pippinids but the template is a Carolingian template.  Pepin and Grimoald have nothing to do with the others' succession rights or heritable lands.  They were not Carolingians and I don't think they should be considered as such on the template, which should be conveying accurate information in a simple, understandable, and stylistic way.  I think the template, as is, just takes up space in many articles.  Actually showing a clear succession of the family makes more sense that what it is currently.  Do you have any suggestions for improving it while retaining the Pippinid information? Srnec 21:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Much improved. Thankyou. Srnec 15:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

text: What I did is transform this clearly into a template about a family, without regard for mayors or kings. The last three titem point to three (or rather two) sub-templates about Eastern and Western Carolingians. Right now I don't know how to make the link more clear. Str1977 17:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pippinids and Arnulfings

message: I put a width parameter in there. To use it append |999px to the call where 999 is any px size. If your widths suddenly are different, they are now the default. I had no idea what default to put in. You can fix specific instances by using the parameter. If you have a  standard default, go ahead, put it in. I suggest it be a reasonable width. You would not use the default to fix just one article! The width instance does that. I was going by Charlemagne.Dave (talk) 00:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Width parameter