Talk:South Thanet (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :South Thanet (UK Parliament constituency)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ynmp2015":
From Newbury (UK Parliament constituency): https://yournextmp.com/constituency/65862/
From Witney (UK Parliament constituency): https://yournextmp.com/constituency/65622/
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:South Thanet (UK Parliament constituency)]] 

message: Please undo previous edit of 10.57 on 5 May. Official list of candidates (http://thanet.gov.uk/your-services/elections-and-voting/parliamentary-election-2015/south-thanet/) does not support this edit. A sensible solution has been proposed in the Al Murray section of the talk page. 
Frinton100 (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Discuss in section above please. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Redrose64 I'm happy to discuss in the section above which I created some time ago. But none of the editors who have changed the entry prior to my protection request have contributed to this section, neither did the editor who requested the change this morning - which begs the question of why was that edit done in the first place as there was no consenus?! The only other editor to contribute to the discussion was Bondegezou with the sensible suggestion I referred to above which I completely support.Frinton100 (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, agreed. Bondegezou (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 5 May 2015 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on South Thanet (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160129132219/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/2011/census-data/2011-census-interactive-content/index.html to http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/2011/census-data/2011-census-interactive-content/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150507183430/http://thanet.gov.uk:80/your-services/elections-and-voting/parliamentary-election-2015/south-thanet to http://thanet.gov.uk/your-services/elections-and-voting/parliamentary-election-2015/south-thanet/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: While the seat did change hands from Labour to Conservative at the  2010 general election it did so on different boundaries. The change in vote shares would seem to be based on the notional result had the 2010 boundaries been in use in at the 2005 election and if right would imply Conservative 41.2% Labour 39.5%. Thus Conservative win would be a more accurate description (if the figures are correct). Dunarc (talk) 21:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 result - Conservative gain?