lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Triton (content delivery)

message: This is a basic article I put together based on what information is published by DiStream, in anticipation that the service(and by extension the article) will become more important as the service's first high-profile game, Prey, launches in a few weeks.
It still needs a lot of work, including better Wikification, a product list, more information on how the service works and its technological underpinnings, and possibly user experience. Please add to it as you can.
ViRGE 00:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: 3dRealms has found out that Triton is being shut down without Digital Streams bothering to tell them. Isn't that nice? --ViRGE 19:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources! Forum posts are a-ok if they are by an admin or otherwise official. --Tom Edwards 19:27, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/737/737827p1.html - It looks like it's gone under.  Triton was pretty much a joke, they never had anything like a Half-Life 2 to ram digital distribution down people's throats.  Instead of trying to launch their own service, they should have tried to farm out their streaming tech to other digital distribution companies.  I don't know whether it's just the Triton service that's died, or the entire DiStream company behind it, it looks like the latter. - Hahnchen 01:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shutting Down
Talk:SpectroMagic

message: Why was the soundtrack information deleted? It was relevant to the article and there was no point in removing it. --blm07 00:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article contains good information, but is written in a first-person style and contains fragment sentences and typos. It could use an overhaul to be more "encyclopedic" in tone, according to Wikipedia's definition. Lindmere 22:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving tone

message: Does DTMF have a different meaning at Disney than in the rest of the world, or is someone just perpetuating an error they heard somewhere?  24.23.132.161 23:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, they definitely use DTMF tones broadcast over a low power transmitter in order to synchronize the SMPTE generators on each unit.  At least they certainly did back when I was involved....  Charlie Richmond 06:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Are you sure that it's not just SMPTE Time Code which is in binary form. It sounds a lot like DTMF tones, but is really just the time code counting. Tiggerjay 04:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I'm absolutely certain it is DTMF - they used that because it was easier to transmit over low power RF links without dropping data, which was more likely using LTC and definitely better than some sort of digital transmission format which was in its infancy back then. Furthermore, they used DTMF only to synchrnonize the start of each minute of time with a short burst of DTMF tones rather than send out continuous time code.  There was an onboard TC generator that simply resynched with the DTMF tones at the top of each minute.  Charlie Richmond 17:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DTMF?

message: I'm sure this parade actually started in 1991 or earlier in Florida. I was holidaying there in October of that year, and I remember seeing it then. Andrew (My talk) 23:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start Year 

message: Hi, I added a link to the SpectroMagic page on my web site SpectroMagic which has a lot of pictures of SpectroMagic... I thought this was relevant and would be ok... and I see links on other attraction wiki pages to slideshows and videos... but it was deleted as spam or something... if I shouldn't add it sorry for adding it and won't try to again... but I would think people looking for spectromagic may be interested.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterpanfan1953 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site Link 

message: I hope this parade comes to Disneyland in time for Summer Nightastic 2011! 75.51.185.120 (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans for Summer 2011
Talk:Sally Becker

message: Hmm. It seems I'm having a change of heart, being that I was the one to have proposed this article for speedy deletion shortly after it was created. I'm reading some google hits for Sally Becker (there are 632 at time of writing) and looking at the line "Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events" as an example of a sufficiently notable person according to WP:BIO. I'm coming around to think that though this article may be or have been sub-standard, the subject is not. I'm going to try to clean it up a bit, add a template or two, and remove the PROD. BigNate37 00:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done as much as I can for this article in the time I had. Hopefully it gets more attention in the future. BigNate37 00:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sally Becker seems to pass [[WP:BIO]] 

message: I've removed some of the information that seems to have been copied. I probably missed somethings, so revert as necessary —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SmileToday (talk • contribs) 21:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Eugene Lang

message: New York is not in Hungary. Chicheley 00:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lang College Queens Hospital calls him a native New Yorker, so changed. --Dhartung | Talk 05:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Self contradictory
Talk:Mott the Hoople

message: Who decided that Mott the Hoople qualified as "one hit wonders"? I strongly disagree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gil gosseyn (talk • contribs) 07:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Where do you see this stated ? It is obviously erroneous. RGCorris (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One-hit wonders" 

message: The entry for the band's name in the "Timeline" section is completely illegible/unintelligible. Perhaps just do it the way the members are listed, where the "name" is color-coded and listed in the color key? 24.151.103.37 (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Name in "Timeline"
Talk:Vickers Viscount

message: "Although George Edwards had favoured the 800 hp Rolls-Royce Dart[7] other engines were considered"
800 doesn't seem very likely to me. That is far too small an output for an aircraft of this size and era, and they would have just used an old single row radial if they only needed 800hp. They could just make it a single engine plane with a big 1,600hp radial or Merlin. That and all the variants listed on the article for that powerplant are in the 1,600-1,800hp class. 
Idumea47b (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is all sourced - and note that the Dart grew a lot, as did the Viscount (initial proposals were for a 24-seater aircraft- it was the ability of the Dart to deliver ever-increasing power which allowed the Viscount to grow into a much more capable aircraft.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine
Talk:Necropolis (Judge Dredd story)

message: This article drastically needs expanding. Richard75 00:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There we go! Phil Smith 02:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  16:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Felis lanea

message: Except for the comment about this being "50 percent larger than a normal cheetah", this sounds identical with the description of a woolly cheetah, which is already covered under the Cheetah article. I can barely find any references to "Felis lanea" online, butthis one refers to it as a synonym of the woolly cheetah. This picture can be of some value, so I'm not sure if this article should be outright deleted or merged with the Cheetah article. Tell me what you think Cameron 00:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Whale (computer virus)

message: ...Could someone please clarify what exactly the virus does? ~Mandy! (For best results, use twice daily.) 01:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

message: It infects files and little else.  
Anyway I suppose at the time, if you looked at antivirus databases, you'd find something about "complicated stealth techniques" or maybe "non-functioning" depending on the AV company.  I always took it to mean that none of them had bothered analyzing it or couldn't understand what it was doing, and just throwing it in their detection lists and not actually detecting it was a safe bet.  
IIRC from my own disassembly of it (wouldn't run on my machine) it didn't really have any polymorphic code, it just picked a decryptor from a bunch of pre-written ones.  The system slowdown was due to it putting the machine in debug trace mode almost constantly to prevent debuggers from getting into it, and hooking the keyboard interrupt and re-checking the interrupt vectors for trace and breakpoint (01h / 03h) on every keypress to determine whether anything had hooked one, whereupon it would immediately try to reboot the system which is the exact opposite of stealth.  It used the standard technique of cutting off an MCB towards the upper end of memory by flagging the previous as the last in the chain so it wouldn't show up as used memory, but half the viruses in existence were doing that.  It looks like there might have been a bug in the trace interrupt handler that could cause it to chain the handler to itself during the interrupt, which probably built up over time until it was executing the handler hundreds of times per instruction executed, and the handler wasn't very efficient so there's some more slowdown.  That's as far as I care to look, it wasn't all that interesting except for the cryptic message about it doing something special with another virus but that part was never written apparently so nothing special there either.   It had some payload that only applied to some obscure patch in IBM-DOS I couldn't be bothered to look up the meaning of and didn't have a machine that it would do anything to. A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 11:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What it does in response to questions on this page / Claims made by the article
Talk:Keyword stuffing

message: I've noticed that in sites like Youtube, users will add a large amount of unrelated, but popularly searched terms to the description of their videos to generate more hits, and to appear more often on the "related videos" sidebar. Someone should make a section for this type of keyword stuffing. Zell65 (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use other than for search engines 

message: I propose we merge this page with Spamdexing. There's already a section in Spamdexing about keyword stuffing, so I see no reason why it should have its own article. BobsFullBogs (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: * Merge – there is too much overlap given the relative simplicity of the terms gilgongo (talk) 12:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Spamdexing
Talk:Shinji Udaka

message: Notability was asserted. I don't think this qualifies for CSD A7. Please contest this via prod or AfD. Thanks. –Dicty (T/C) 01:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. A player that played all of three seasons and retired a half decade ago is not exactly notable. --Slyder PilotE@ 01:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be, but notability was asserted, so CSD A7 is not met. AfD is the proper venue to contest WP:N breaches. –Dicty (T/C) 01:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then might I add this to the discussion: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information --Slyder PilotE@ 01:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: CSD A7, the current speedy rationale, states "An article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject." This is not met because the article claims that this person was the player in a notable baseball team and was a top pick. This may not meet the threshold for inclusion in WP, but, for a third time, AfD is the venue to raise this objection, not speedy deletion. –Dicty (T/C) 01:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contesting speedy delete
Talk:Francine (wrestling)

message: Does anyone else thing that Francine should redirect here? Romis 03:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The Francine page is currently a disambiguation page. I wouldn't recommend altering it for the purpose you suggest. A link stating that anyone looking for "Francine" as in ECW should go to the Francine Fournier article will suffice. --CJ Marsicano 03:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect here?

message: I had to remove the URLs for both ForeverFrancine.com and the Francine/Missy Hyatt "TV" site because Ms. Fournier is no longer affilated with the latter, and the URL for the former now points to Francine's former webmaster's site. However, Ms. Fournier's MySpace page is still a going and legitimate concern, so I have readded that link. --CJ Marsicano 01:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official sites changed 

message: * Stunner - http://www.owow.com/RingsideWith/Francine/index.htm
* She used a top rope hurricanrana at Guilty as Charged 2001. It was known as the "Coochiecanrana" - http://slam.canoe.ca/SlamWrestlingPPV/jan8_ecwguilty-can.html
* Tunacanrana (bronco buster) - geocities.com/xpw5yearslater/ecwmoves.htm
I trust that is sufficient. McPhail 23:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finishing moves
Talk:Beyond the Break

message: Hello!
The series hasn't end. I think that the makers turned the fourth season until June of 2010. A hungarian TV channel's program manager announced that will be soon the fourth season on TV.
The article's writer got the turning and the projection confused.
By: CsepeLee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CsepeLee (talk • contribs) 15:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim of fourth season 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Dismal's Paradox

message: I had to remove my vote to BJAODN and edit my nominating reason because I found out that the nominating comment is counted as a vote by the DFBot. Jesse Viviano 01:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I removed my vote 

message: How many votes until it gets deleted? Or does it go by days (and vote counting after that?)? Zos 02:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AfD is note a vote, the number of votes does not count, it is the quality of the arguments that determines an articles fate. See Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion#Closure. Viridae 02:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I meant consensus. A survey if you wish. And thanks for showing me where my question can be answered. Zos 02:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No probs. Viridae 02:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  votes
Talk:Phish: Live in Brooklyn

message: Looking through the history, it seems that for a long long time, live albums were listed chronologically based on the date of the concert. This makes much more sense it seems. In fact, The White Tape is a perfect example. It might not have been released until 1998, but clearly it makes sense to list it as the first studio album because it was recorded in 1986. Yet, with live albums, it really jumbles up the discography by having a 1995 concert listed as coming after Undermind. It would be different if it was a LIVE COMPILATION or something, but this is a live album recorded in a certain era, and should be listed int he order of that era.
Please vote here as to whether live albums should be listed in order of CONCERT DATE, or RELEASE DATE.
Thanks - User:Sectornine
Release Date.  It's like listing Star Wars episodes I-III before IV-VI.  It is not a chronology of shows, but a chronology of albums.  JEMP Records didn't even exist until late 2005.
Milchama 12:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  VOTE on chronolgy of Live in Brooklyn 

message: I believe that we don't need seperate pages for the Brooklyn DVD and CD.  In fact, the CD has been promoted as a "soundtrack", as if its an ancillary item.  If nobody else votes on this by Saturday, I will merge the pages myself.
Milchama 12:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge both Brooklyn Pages
Talk:Phish: New Year's Eve 1995 – Live at Madison Square Garden

message: I agree with everything said in this article, but it's because I'm a Phishead. Wikipedia is not a fansite, and this article sure does look like a fansite. --~Magnolia Fen (talk) 11:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to cut down the POV -- better?  In the future, feel free to be bold!  (And please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~.) —  MusicMaker5376 16:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Asset stripping

message: It looks like the FSA has been abolished, but I don't know what's replaced it. 
In any case, this article mainly focuses on examples and regulations specific to the UK, 
and seems to editorialize the topic as mainly a bad thing without citing others' critique. Joe SchmedleyT* 04:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think now we can remove most of the UK examples, as they weren't highly useful to the article anyway. There are still some POV issues with the article, as well as lack of organization between the sections that I'm not comfortable trying to fix myself. Joe SchmedleyT* 18:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: How does an asset stripper make sure the revenue is to themselves? They buy the company and sell its assets to make money, I get that. But when they sell its assets, how do they make the revenue go to themselves and not back into the company? 110.55.2.1 (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If the asset stripper bought the entire company, they now exercise total control of it and can simply make the company pay a dividend to its owners (i.e. the asset stripper). ExplodingCabbage (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does an asset stripper make sure the revenue is to themselves? 

message: The history section claiming 3 originators of Asset Stripping is inaccurate, as Tiny Rowland, James Goldsmith, and Jim Slater were all engaging in this activity in the later 60s and early 70s (prior to the men listed). LeapUK (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not merely they, but Lords Hanson and  White seemed to be notorious;  men Lady Thatcher could do business with... Claverhouse (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate history
Talk:Force protection condition

message: This device must sense a sound in area that at any action to search enemy. In front of this device, have very sensitive diaphragm(I thing that it must thin plastic looks like a parabolic antenna). When this device sense any sound, for example in mountain, electronical PCB in device in t=0,00... s calculates: direction and distance of a sound(sound of enemy). At this point, on LCD screen soldier see a direction and automaticly distance about source of sound. If it haven't any new sound, soldier see fixed knowledges. But, if device hear a new sound, device calculate again and send to LCD screen new knowledges that soldier must see. Note about device: Device, send image about last sounds source and if soldier go to left or right side, device automaticly print on LCD screen direction with distance according sound's source.
netiq69 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Netiq69 (talk • contribs) 11:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things about Military sound electronic device that use in one hand 

message: Defcon does not "assesses the amount of military forces needed to be deployed in a situation with a certain likelihood of attack against the civilian population." DEFCON is readiness status of the military for combat.Royalcourtier (talk) 00:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DEFON 
Talk:Belgravia

message: Is this place named after Belgrave? Simply south 15:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted in the article about Belgrave Square there is a village called Belgrave close to the Duke of Westminister's country house Eaton Hall so most likely the name is derived from that. Brammen 23:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Pimlico Road is not near Belgravia, but north of Kensington ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.129.57.43 (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pimlico Road 

message: On a guided tour through Belgravia I once learned that the houses owned by Duke of Westminster always have to be painted in Magnolia, the Duke's favourite colour and that the paint has to be refreshed every five years. Could somebody kindly find out if this is (still) true and mention it in the article? Thank you. --192.109.50.228 (talk) 13:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paint of Magnolia 

message: There is probably more up to date information available about the two houses bought by the Russian. Were they merged? What are they valued at today? --Greenmaven (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowndes Square 

message: Before the boroughs of Kensington and Chelsea were merged in 1965, was Belgravia in one or the other?  It's odd that the article doesn't say.  Do Londoners no longer distinguish between "in Kensington" and "in Chelsea"? —Tamfang (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kensington and/or Chelsea 

message: We state: "The area takes its name from one of the Duke's subsidiary titles, Viscount Belgrave." Does it actually do so, or does it take its name from Belgrave Square? (Obviously the square was named for the title, but "named after a square which is named after a title" is different to "named after a title".) Proteus (Talk) 11:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The London Encyclopedia says "", while for Belgrave Square it says "". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Named after title?

message: Just a passing comment: any charity that paid rents at those levels would be grossly in breach of trust.----Ehrenkater (talk) 14:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charity HQs
Template talk:Harvest Moon series

message: I screwed something up, but I'm not sure what. If someone who knows more about this kind of template could fix it up, that would be great. -- Jelly Soup 01:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fix'D some time ago. Just leaving a note. -- Jelly Soup 20:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: While this game has no article and is nothing more than a remake/port of Harvest Moon: Back to Nature, there has been some conflict over it. It has been added and removed several times. I figured a quick solution would be to add it and redirect Boy & Girl to Back to Nature. If anyone else has a better idea, please, speak. -- Jelly Soup 10:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it has been a while since you stated this, and the article was made again and it looked like the worst article for a proper subject I had ever seen. I Redirected it to that article, and i thought i was the first to propose that idea, but i see from this that I'm happily not the first. I also tweaked the places its mentioned at across other Harvest Moon articles, such as the main series' article.-- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 19:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harvest Moon Boy & Girl