lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Austria hungary 1911.jpg

message: This picture is very difficult to read -- in particular the city names; I guess it's just to give a rough idea of the ethnic boundaries ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.167.202.14 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 12 October 2004 
:If you click on the image you can see the full-size version. The city names are easier to read then. —Angr 09:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

message: The Italian speaking part of the Austrian-Hungarian empire is shown wrong in this map.
Italian government claimed the terretory during WWI with the pretence to be an Italian language area. 
In fact this part called "Südtirol" (South Tyrol, Italian: Alto Adige) had 97% German speaking population in 1911 (it always was part of Tyrol and never belonged to Italy before). Despite heavy sanctions of the Italian government between WWI and WWII (e.g. ban of the German language) there is still a population of 60-70% speaking German (admitting to be Austrian). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.166.239.185 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 2 April 2006 
:The map is right. The area around Trento (today the Province of Trento) was predominantly Italian-speaking then as now, while the area around Bozen (today the Province of Bolzano-Bozen) was predominantly German-speaking then as now. —Angr 09:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian speaking parts
Talk:GoldenEye 007 (1997 video game)

message: Is there a reason why the Switch release is not mention in the release column? nEsLiNk (talk) 14:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to say the same thing, and I initially concurred. However, I looked up Super Mario Bros. (as an exemplar), and it only mentioned the original releases, which honestly makes sense and probably lessens confusion. Nevertheless, this brings up an interesting thought: where is the cutoff point for a release and a re-issue on a new platform? Electricmaster (talk) 01:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Switch is an emulated release via NSO. And according to WP:VG/PLATFORMS, we don't list those in the infobox. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switch? 

message: There should be a small notation of speed running for this game - It literally began here with Goldeneye and bleed into early twitch movement many years later where people "stream" progress of respective games online - Goldeneye was a catalyst for this aspect of gaming which being James Bond was all about efficiency in completing an objective usually in a "target time" thus blooming the golden age of speed running - Even the gaming magazines in their day would put up target times for their respective readers to try and "surpass" to be listed in their magazine - For instance Nintendo Power magazine had Goldeneye programmers "best time" on the Facility stage in OOA setting at 1:25 which unlocked invincibility deeming one of the top "cheats" unlocked in Goldeneye - S.N 72.45.35.55 (talk) 03:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed running the Golden Age 

message: The redirect GoldenEye 007 (1997 video game has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 20:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:GoldenEye 007 (1997 video game]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tri-

message: Transwiki entry redirected to Wiktionary:tri; Sanskrit etymology and use in chemical element naming added to Wiktionary entry. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Contrary to what this article, as well as the articles for the numerical prefixes Greek numerical prefixes and Latin numerical prefixes and 3 (number) say, tri- words can pretty much be either Latin or Greek, and tre- words are not very common in English. Any comments on any improvements to these pages?? 66.245.127.59 21:16, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange news
Talk:Tricorn Centre

message: As I said on Talk:Tricorn when I rewrote it, I'd appreciate someone from Pompey to clean up this article - I've never even been there. Most of this article is my one from Tricorn, although I've added anything additional that Tricon Centre had to say. Kiand 21:18, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: Could someone who can upload images upload the really cool Tricorn logo? It's on a few of the linked pages. Thanx 68.39.174.150 07:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Apparently, there were "designer" flats in the Tricorn. I have not been able to find much information on them, let alone a single picture. Apparently they were not occupied for long because they got damp and had various other problems.
: There were flats there, I don't know about 'designer' though!  They were pretty small, and never occupied because of the damp, had the windows not been boarded up when I was there I bet the views must have been amazing.  From what I remember, there was a block of about eight, two per floor.  I don't know if there was another block elsewhere in the complex, but that's the one I remember exploring.  --82.31.48.100 (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The flats were nothing special.  Odd little layout with the lounge wrapped around the kitchen, but other than that they were standard-fair 1960's concrete flats, with all the benefits and issues therein.  The tower of flats is actually one of the more popular photos that exist of the Tricorn.. it's the photo with the name sign at the bottom, some very green concrete above, and then very obvious boarded up windows above.  With a little more care in the construction of these they could have been quite nice, but the access walkways were open to the weather (like all the walkways really) the lift was miniscule, the stairways cramped and the damp issues horrendous. 89.241.193.24 (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flats 

message: i think the following need to be linked/cited, because they're simple statements of challangable fact and also they're interesting, and the kind of thing people might want to look up more:
1/ voted 3rd ugliest building
2/ voted most hated building
3/ grew stalagtites
so, you know, if anyone agrees and isn't as lazy as me :D 
gotta love the wiki method --Dak (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations/linkage 

message: I am misremembering or did the Tricorn feature in Dr. Who as the City of the Daleks on Skyro?  Certainly can'tseem to see an online source for that currently.  Thanks. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daleks?
Talk:Cantina

message: Although I'm really very new to this, I think that maybe this may need some work.  It sounds as if the word "cantina" originated in the movie Star Wars, but that isn't the case...at least according to the etymology in the dictionary.
I believe the word "Cantina" existed well before Star Wars.  Hopefully you are joking...
It certainly did.  I have included textual references and etymologies to demonstrate that this is so. --Polylerus 15:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:TBA (disambiguation)

message: Just a dicdef. Has an exact clone in Wicktionary. ClockworkTroll 22:00, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The way I see it, checking category pages gives the reader a good overview of the articles on the subject field in question.  Obviously, when reading an article and noticing the categories it's in, a click on one of them will provide other articles in that category, which may be very useful information. However, I will settle for a Redirect; after all, the TBx-articles point to each other. --Wernher 14:13, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: "~0 wiki-storage" →Wikipedia:Don't worry about performance Torzsmokus 20:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: from VfD

message: Just which one is it? :S82.36.244.186 (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Be Announced or To Be Ascertained?
Talk:Constitutional Court of Hungary

message: Does a redirect like this do any good? Is there a Wikipedian policy to make such redirects?
--Adam78 22:58, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The section "controversy over the new constitution" is dealing not only with the rules regulating the functioning of the Court, but with the whole new Hungarian constitution itself. If this section will be expanded with further reactions of international organisations, we should consider redirection to the constitution of Hungary --Ltbuni (talk) 13:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection again
Talk:City of Los Angeles (train)/to do

message: * Add a photo or two of the train in action
* Elaborate on the competition between this train and the Super Chief
* Did this train operate on CNW rails into Chicago? Yes, until 1955.
* Add a list of the communities served by this train. Stops in 1950 added. (Perha45 (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Cooke Locomotive and Machine Works

message: Transportation Museum Welcomes Historic Civil War Locomotive, the Texas
Looks like we need to update the location/disposition!  Not quite sure of the detail to put in the main page though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkylosSobaka (talk • contribs) 15:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  N.C. Transportation Museum Welcomes Historic Civil War Locomotive, the Texas
Talk:Davenport Locomotive Works

message: Added a photo of a preserved Davenport fireless locomotive at the Heart of Dixie Railroad Museum in Calera, Alabama. Article could certainly use some more photos so I am leaving the To Do tag for now.Civilengtiger (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Added a Low assessment to WP Trains block corresponding to Davenport's role as a notable, but not prolific, builder of locomotives. Civilengtiger (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Trains assessment
Talk:H.K. Porter, Inc.

message: * Light Railways Catalogue 1889 --NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalogues 

message: The H K Porter Inc is a Boston manufacture of bolt cutters and other tools. This wiki entry titled “H K Porter, Inc is correct for Henry Knox Porter of Everett, MA. This entry should be titled H K Porter & Co, HK Porter Co, or H K Porter Co., Inc, the succession of company names, of Pittsburg, PA. The owner of H K Porter Co was Henry Kirke Porter. Oddly the Boston Porter was born and died 6 years after the Porter of Pittsburg. 208.100.136.236 (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper name of company
Talk:Project for the New American Century/Survey/Archive

message: Definitely version 2. 
:This is just a draft for the survey, to work out what the question should be. Please don't start voting yet. Bryan 02:11, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha ha ha!  This is the TDC who wrote "I dont know where people get this, but the "new pearl harbor" phrase is not found in any of PNAC's documents."  Sir, you are not qualified to criticise others for not reading the documents. CK 17:18, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Is this in reference to VV pointing out that the document in question doesn't actually mention Iraq? I hate to sound like a broken record, but version 1 above doesn't mention Iraq either. It refers to "PNAC's agenda" without specifying what it actually is. Bryan 02:11, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that many of the critics who deceptively quote RAD do mention Iraq is notable, if this tabloid criticism is at all. VV 08:33, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: By all means, propose a merged version. There's been a great deal of aimless argument in the main talk page over this issue, I'd love to have others participating and making alternate suggestions. Bryan 02:06, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: CK could have proposed some sort of merge, just like I did.  But instead he chose to revert me repeatedly.  And so here we are. VV 07:49, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: VeryVerily is lying, as an examination of the edit history of the PNAC page will reveal. CK 18:19, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: I'll start.  Underlying issue #1: CK's version makes no logical sense. VV 07:49, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Node (networking)

message: About.com is referenced to source the claim that nodes are the same as hosts on a TCP/IP network. That claim I've never seen anywhere else and I believe it is wrong. All hosts are nodes, but not all nodes are hosts. Not even on IP-networks. Level 2 switches are also nodes.--itpastorn (talk) 09:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding to my own statement. This source is almost word for word identical with the glossary in CCNA, and defines node in three ways: Letter N at Total Telecom Glossary. (CCNA has the first and last.) I will attempt (given time) to rewrite the article accordingly.--itpastorn (talk) 13:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About.com is wrong 

message: In preparation for my rewrite I am gathering useful info here:--itpastorn (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  useful links and info 

message: *I agree. Merge!--itpastorn (talk) 15:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: How can this article be considered "high importance" if the Talk page clearly indicates this article is pointless and a merger is even suggested to include nodes in all possible fields. I would love to contribute to get an article from the quality level "start" to "C" or higher, but then we do need some concrete pointers on what is missing or whether or not the article is even needed.
Tommiie (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think anyone questions the importance of the concept, it's just that coverage of the concept is spread out our repeated in many places (Networking hardware, Communication endpoint, Terminal (telecommunication), End system, Data terminal equipment, Data circuit-terminating equipment, Node (computer science), Host (network)). I think what we are struggling with is how to best organize this coverage. ~Kvng (talk) 13:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense. But isn't that inherent to Wikipedia? The same applies for Multicast, Multicast address, IP Multicast et cetera. Tommiie (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is not a unique problem. Anything you can do to improve this would be appreciated. ~Kvng (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Importance
Talk:Foča

message: Moved to Foca following the BiH Supreme Court decision, see   . GeneralPatton 07:10, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added citation for the camps and rapes. Someone deleted them. I am reinstating them. The ICTY is a reliable source.--Barend 19:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations given - and deleted 

message: I was just checking the revision history of this page and detected a massive deletion of the “History” section made by someone called “Rep.Srpska”. The guy made a basic “ethnic cleansing” of the past of this city during World War II (omitting battles between the chetniks and partisans and the monument to the latter) and the Bosnian War (omitting all the dark pages of the sons-of-a-Mladich) and adding a lot of Serb Orthodox church images to the gallery.
Very typical for an extremist.
I’ll correct this, re-adding the lost information and putting something more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.13.104.95 (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: “Rep.Srpska” history section cleansing

message: Number of 8000 muslims killed by chetniks is exaggerated.8000 is wrong reference.You should also mention Serbs murdered by Bosniak ustasha.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.1.45 (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: How can you talk about religions of Foča and reference the number of members of a certain nationality (such as Serbs, Croats, ...). Nationality is not a religion. You could write, Orthodox, Catholic Christian, but not "Croat" or "Serb".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.64.27.9 (talk) 07:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religions of Foca?
Talk:Plymouth Locomotive Works

message: This article needs a citation on the figure that there may be 1700 plymouth locomotives still operating.  Also Plymouth built locomotives up to 120 tons.  The assertion that most Plymouth locomotives were built under 25 tons needs to be examined closely as it appears incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.86.69 (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

message: The article on the town of Plymouth mentions Silver King tractors--shouldn't there be mention here?  (I don't know enough of the details to do it myself)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sevesteen (talk • contribs) 02:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver King tractors
Talk:Schenectady Locomotive Works

message: According to this article, Schenectady No. 1 was once owned by Purdue University. It would have been housed in the Mechanical Engineering engine bay and connected to a dynamometer. Other engines were tested there over the years. Working engines would be run up to the football field, blowing their whistle every time Purdue scored a goal. They were collectively known as the "Boilermaker Special."  The "Reuben Wells," a 0-10-0T was a commonly used engine for this purpose. It is now at the Indianapolis Children's Museum.
https://www.prf.org/researchpark/purdue%20railyard/
Dan Bollinger (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schenectady No. 1
Talk:Super Chief/to do

message: I'd like to suggest an edit to the caption in the "Super Chief" article that shows a Diesel locomotive hanging over a retaining wall at Los Angeles Union Station in 1948.  The train in question is not the Super Chief, but the El Capitan.  At that time, the Super Chief and El Capitan streamliners were operating every-other-day-- on the same identical schedule, but on alternating days.  The Super Chief departed each endpoint (and arrived at the opposite endpoint) on even-numbered days of the month, while the El Capitan departed (and arrived) on odd-numbered days of the month.  Since this photo was snapped on January 25th (an odd-numbered day), the train in question is the El Capitan, not the Super Chief.  In fact, perhaps this photo should be moved from the Super Chief article to the El Capitan article?
The reference below is from a Santa Fe Railway public timetable dated January 1947.  The Super Chief is Train 17 (westbound) and 18 (eastbound), while the El Capitan is Trains 21 and 22.  There is a marginal note in the columns for these trains, explaining this arrangement.
www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=47610
ATSF1920 (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Broadway Limited/to do

message: * Expand the history narrative, noting its competition with New York Central's 20th Century Limited.
* Add expand the data on the train's consists throughout its operational years
* Add timetable data
* Add a route map
* Add a photo or two of the train in action
* Add colour photos of the trains streamlined consists. There were two: the 1938 Lowey and the latter "revamp" in 1949.--Jslasher 22:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Arnold of Soissons

message: These (other) Arnulfs were quite secular barons. The connection is with Oudenburg not Oudenaard. I've corrected the article and added some footnotes and references.--Wetman (talk) 14:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Arnulf of Oudenaard"

message: It is separately listed as July 8 and Aug 14 in the article.  I can find very little actual information on him other than this article.  Which of these two days is correct?Autkm (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Feast Day
Talk:Roger Sessions

message: Ack. Wanted to apologize for editing your article without talking with you about it first.  Should I change it back?  Changed Ernst Bloch to Ernest Bloch and added a paragraph, easy enough to do.  Will use talk pages in future.  Mortified... (First day, but that is no excuse...)
Regards
Schissel 02:49, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It makes him look mad and dishevelled with those glasses on his forehead  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.145.169 (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If you care to check the image data, you will discover that it is the official publicity photo from the composer's publisher, used here solely because no copyright-free photo of the subject has been found. If you know of a better, copyright-free portrait, by all means upload it to Wikimedia Commons.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why such an awful photo of this great and famous composer? 
Talk:Parasite Eve II

message: Sept 1, 2006 - This article needs some serious spelling/grammar checking....74.105.146.115 00:34, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some cleanup and I made a lot of links. I am not sure I did a complete job though so could someone finish? I did enough to remove clean-up tag, though. -84.169.248.87 16:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: I just read through this and it looks like a twelve year-old wrote it. I'm not a great user of grammar either, but can someone PLEASE fix this? I read it and had almost no idea what was being said. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.212.92 (talk • contribs) 22:00, September 9, 2006
:The spelling is generally ok but the grammar is horrible (making the article almost unintelligible). If no-one minds, I'll have a go at a re-write...? 136.8.152.13 13:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 
I went ahead and rewrote the first 7 paragraphs - unfortunately I am writing from memory about a game I played many years ago, and with only the existing text to go on I can't be sure about the editing from this point on! Anyone else like to take on the rest? EyeSerene 18:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Addendum to the above: I changed my mind and did the rest as well, taking the story from the somewhat garbled text and memory. If anything needs changing where I've got the details wrong, please go ahead! EyeSerene 10:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Finally finished the edit, added the Reaction section & a few links, although the article could still do with some pictures (I couldn't find any that conform to Licensing policy).EyeSerene 17:57, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ow 

message: Maybe i`m overreacting or taking it personal but i want to say i`m sorry for the bad grammar in the article, i`m mexican, english is not my natural lenguaje, i do what i can Zidane tribal 22:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologies 

message: Have taken on the task of rewriting the plot summary to comply with MoS. Jelli♥BabiS'up 10:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary Rewrite 