Talk:Xbox 360 system software

message: There has been an update to this version today, if we know what's it for, we can add it. --142.167.90.253 (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.0.14719.0 

message: Concerning the information on the applications, rhere's already an article for this content, Xbox 360 applications.  This article is about the system software, not the applications that run on it.  Therefore the content is outside of the scope of this article, and unnecessarily duplicates existing information.  I don't see any reason why the content should be here when it is already present at the other article, which this article already links to. - SudoGhost 09:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xbox 360 applications 

message: IPs continue to add specifics about a supposedly-already-occurred update to the dashboard software. As of yet, no source has been provided, and this update has yet to go live in North America (with the former item being the bigger issue). I've asked for page protection to get people here talking. So, will someone kindly produce a reliable source indicating that this is indeed the current version number and what its features include? Or is this someone's idea of a joke?  --McDoobAU93 02:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  June system update? 

message: Source links:
https://twitter.com/majornelson/status/212605615976095744
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/12/xbox-360-spring-update-rolling-out/
:All both sources say is that some users are receiving an update, and that the rest get it the following week. That doesn't sound like a "public" launch to me. Public beta, perhaps, but not public launch. Besides, neither source includes (a) the updated revision number and (b) what is included in the update. You'll still need to provide that.  --McDoobAU93 14:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  June system update 2.0.15572.0 indeed! 

message: How about adding a certain colour to the current Xbox 360 software version, and a different colour for the beta version similar to what they did over at the iOS version history page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomoK12 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about? 

message: After I noticed that edit summaries were all but hidden because the subhead names were simply too long, I took a closer look at the article. A good-faith effort was made to include links to the various software versions, many of which remain available on Microsoft's website, and the links directed users to Microsoft itself. I've gone through and removed the subhead links per WP:MOSHEAD, relocating any citations to the "Release date" column and external links to the "Availability" column. This should make it easier to follow edit summaries going forward.
That said, is it our duty to provide links to this software? I can't find anything in policy that definitively says we should or should not, but I am curious as to the thinking. As I said in my edit summary, I wasn't going to remove any content pending discussion on the matter. All I did was reorganize what was there.  --McDoobAU93 19:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  We're a file repository now? 

message: Nut allergy? Wut?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.26.81 (talk) 23:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.0.16203.0 

message: There is currently no reliable sources for what changes the 2.0.16517.0 beta contains.  I have removed the unsourced changes and added references for the ones I could find.  If you must include "XOSC Challenge Responses" can you actually explain to the passing user (and me) what they actually are.
Users who post other changes having actually participated in the beta are probably breaking the Non Disclosure Agreement they signed up to when joining the beta program.  I will continue to remove any other unsourced changes until the update becomes official.=> Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 19:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just saw this after updating the article. I came across a reliable source that states two other changes and added them. --GoneIn60 (talk) 12:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As the new software is now 'public' the non disclosure agreement no longer applies.  Of course, it doesn't mean that we can now add other changes without reliable sources. => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 18:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, I reverted my edit. After a lot of searching, I couldn't find a single source to back up WinBeta's claim. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a shame I can't find another source for the removal of Messenger as it'd be one of the notable changes in the update.  Everyone is concentrating on the currency changes. => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 19:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.0.16517.0 

message: What are the new features in this update?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.235.178.231 (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.0.16547 

message: The new system update 16756 can be found here http://download.microsoft.com/download/B/6/9/B6917DAC-C3F2-43EE-97DC-2E19D259F4B8/SystemUpdate_16756_USB.zip
Bilkoff (talk) 00:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —  (e • t • c) 01:42, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2014 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Xbox 360 system software. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100920232547/http://www.xbox.com:80/en-US/kinect/entertainment.htm to http://www.xbox.com/en-US/kinect/entertainment.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100411035833/http://www.xbox.com:80/en-GB/live/NXE/faq.htm to http://www.xbox.com/en-GB/live/NXE/faq.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified