Talk:Medical Journal of Australia

message: The link to the Australasian Journal of Bone & Joint Medicine seems irrelevant and I suggest that this is removed. This linked Journal has no relationship to the Medical Journal of Australia. Likewise, the paragraph beginning "At a 2009 court case in Australia where Merck & Co..." also seems irrelevant as this has no relationship to the Medical Journal of Australia, and should be deleted.
MJA Editor Zoe (talk) 07:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference to the AJBJM is relevant to Stephen Leeder's departure and so shoudl be retained, however it was being given undue weight and it was not clear that the passage did not refer to the MJA. I have refactored that section to make it clearer and less prominent. Yunshui 雲水 08:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Yunshui. MJA Editor Zoe (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: MJA editor comments

message: MEDRS and NPOV content from Medical Journal of Australia to Alternative medicine article
A discussion to restore the first 14 sources of this version, including from Medical Journal of Australia, etc., to the Alternative medicine article is now going on here. ParkSehJik (talk) 03:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) is a peer-reviewed medical journal published 22 times a year. It is the official journal of the Australian Medical Association, published by the Australasian Medical Publishing Company.   Other articles about journals do list this sort of info, but would definitely need a reference. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:02, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed changes

message: :Ranjeetatamang Thanks for taking this to the talk page, rather than making the changes yourself. You clearly do have a conflict of interest, and should adhere by the guidance at COI.
:With regards to the text above, it's not very clear what you are suggesting be changed. Are you suggesting that the content be replaced by your text, or that your text be somehow woven into the article? It might be easier if you made clear, concrete proposals along the lines of 'please change X to Y'.
:Please do note, however, that we aim to use reliably published, secondary independent sources to support any assertion (aside from the most straightforward factual ones, such as the address of an office or the current board members of an organisation). Material should not therefore be referenced to the MJA website. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 06:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please have a look at our journal article writing guide. This article will certainly not be replaced by your text, which is way to promotional. It reads like this could be a copy of text from its own website (I have no time right now to check this). We don't include lists of editorial board members either. As Girth Summit said, if there are any specific points that are currently incorrect or missing, you can list those here. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a look through and am formatting for readability and to note which parts are the changes from the original article.  except for bulletpoint lists T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 10:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: *I've merged the Wiley information under the section on Elsevier having read the reference. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

text: *I've merged some parts of the Free and open access section as a subsection of the Publishing section. The journal's website is probably a sufficient ref, since I don't expect we'll find an external one. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

text: *The article processing fee waiver is notable so I've added that it. I think the 'About us' reference is sufficient, but an external ref would be better. I'm surprised it's not been mentioned in any news article. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 10:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

text: *I've not seen other articles on academic journals list previous editors and advisory board members. Perhaps something for Wikidata? Is the 'advisory board' structure notable? I've not come across it for other journals. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:04, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

text: It might be worth also mentioning the H pylorii paper that was instrumental in the 2005 Nobel prize? I think it remains one of their most-cited papers. Possibly also the 1949s Lithium paper and the 1995 whistleblowing paper. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 12:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Not notable, but may deserve brief mention in main article. Randykitty (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge, btw.  Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 08:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[MJA InSight]] into [[Medical Journal of Australia]]