lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Munger district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yellow grease

message: Know little about this topic. 
But you're kidding, right? 
Lard and tallow are hardly vegetable oils! Williamborg 14:15, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[Lard]] and [[tallow]] with vegetable oils

message: Better than nothing, Dfrg.msc 09:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Bhagalpur district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 11:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Doesn't meet WP:NLIST. Also, the district's article isn't long enough to require a split. The content would work nicely in a section called "Education" there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. you should Marge with bhagalpur district thankyou Proverealbiharhistory (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. this proposal seems fair. I'll do it. Kautilyapundit (talk) 16:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of educational institutes in Bhagalpur]] into [[Bhagalpur district]] 

message: Kautilyapundit (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Theory of the two demons

message: I'm fixing the reference to Pablo (not Raúl) Giussani's book. My copy is from the 3rd edition (in 3 months, 5K each); that turnout hardly can be assessed as "poor reception" at that point of time in Argentina. Ejrrjs | What? 22:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't want to be argumentative, just to clarify... Yes, the name was Pablo. Yes, it was definitely a best-seller. Yet, it was received with strong criticism by the "intellectual" circles that were close to Human Rights organizations and/or publications of that time like "El Porteño" and/or the Humanities and Social Science faculties (Filo y Socio, for us :-) It was a book that had a thesis and used every shred of a fact to justify the required analogy, even when it was a stretch. Contrast with Gillespie's book, which provided the public a much needed critique of Montoneros with less animosity and a large body of evidence such as quotations from publications and interviews with the relevant people. (Sidenote: looks like the article stays within the parameters I asked for, which I like. Also, for some relief, go read Edmundo Rivero) elpincha 23:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Giussani

message: Maybe we should rename this to "Theory of the two demons" and be done with it. I named it "doctrine" initially because "theory" sounded so wrong, but it's just a label...
I passed by Fascism (United States) and Fascist (epithet) and I think we should explain that 2D is not only a rhetorical device but also, or alternatively, a political epithet. It seems this article must be in that list. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epithet? Rename?  

message: I've just reworded the latest addition to the background section.
* It's unwise to use the euphemistic term "collateral" (as in collateral damage), least of all in "quotes". It makes the sentence look ironic. "Incidental" means "casual", "concomitant" or "following as a consequence".
* I also deleted "... including women and children". "Civilians", with no other qualifications, makes it clear that they were all kinds of civilians.
Finally, I added a  tag to get proper sources about the figures. "Thousands of bombings, hundreds of kidnappings" is vague and I'm not sure by whom, or how, they were counted. Could the editor who added the text say where s/he got it from? Other than that, we should stick to the vague but safer "many". —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 02:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subversive actions 

message: Hi, I find this atricle's topic quite interesting indeed. However, it's difficult to assess its verifiability as it does not cite sources (something required by Wikipedia policies/guidelines, especially for potentially controversial/POV topics). Can anyone please provide them? I'll tag the article, to highlight this. Thanks & kind regards, DPdH (talk) 23:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources & citations, please?
Talk:Born on the Fourth of July

message: We've got a long section "Plot synopsis" describing the plot and referring to the film, but then a section "Film adaptation" which seems oblivious to the preceding description.  If the "Plot synopsis" section accurately describes the book, the words "film" in it should be changed to "book".  Otherwise, I think one or both sections should be revised somehow. —Steve Summit (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: plot synopsis section: film or movie?

message: "The first track on The Killers album Sam's Town with the same title features the lyric 'My brother he was born on the fourth of July...'"
The phrase isn't exclusive to this film/book--is that REALLY relevant?
FangsFirst 23:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: anybody know what part John C. McGinley played in the movie —The preceding unsigned comment was added by -the-muffin-man- (talk • contribs) 18:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the IMDB-entry: John C. McGinley ...  Official #1 - Democratic Convention (as John McGinley) Fred26 20:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John C. McGinley 

message: I've flagged the PTSD statement at the end.  Unless someone can produce statistics indicating that PTSD is "common to nearly all" Vietnam veterans it should either stay flagged or be removed. They all do not have PTSD and not all vets will have it just for going to some war and shooting a gun at other people. 96.2.68.175 (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PTSD and Vietnam 
Talk:List of peace activists

message: The notable Christian peace activist Kees Koning should be mentioned in the list. 77.169.5.33 (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delay in replying. As always for this list, any candidate for inclusion should have an existing article. So please write an article on him first; he can then be added here if he meets the criteria for inclusion. Note that there is already an article for him on wp:nl, but a straight translation would not be suficient, as it lacks sources, so you would have to find and add them too (this appears to be a general problem with the Nederlands wiki). --NSH001 (talk) 09:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kees Koning 

message: Would it not be better to try to include something more specific in each entry that explains in a few words why the person is listed than just "[nationality] peace activist" or the like. After all, if the person were not a "peace activist" then presumably they wouldn't be on this list at all. PDGPA (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Also, this list needs clearer referencing. WP:PEOPLELIST requires that –so a person should be described generally as a "peace activist" by independent reliable sources to be included in this list. Llll5032 (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short descriptions of listed individuals 

message: The Henry Ford edit presents a perfect illustration of why the list needs consistent, articulated standards. Henry Ford did not "oppose" WWII, for example, so much as he opposed U.S. involvement in WWII, because he was virulently anti-semitic and therefore a Nazi sympathizer. This should not count as being a "peace activist" any more than a U.S. Communist's opposing U.S. involvement in WWII during the Hitler-Stalin pact. I would suggest that the proper criterion for inclusion here should be something like a principled opposition to war as such, or at least to certain forms of war (i.e., nuclear war, or unjust wars in the Catholic sense of that term), on religious, moral or general philosophical grounds (that war always produces more harm that benefit, for example), coupled with significant, noteworthy personal action in support of those beliefs. Opposition to certain wars, or a particular war, on political grounds (favoring victory for one side over the other) should not qualify. PDGPA (talk) 03:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Henry Ford was added (by me) and then correctly quickly removed. Nothing broken here. But yes, I would personally trim the list to only those who really fit the existing and long-stable descriptor and worked or demonstrated for peace in a major way. Being a pacifist is not enough, although many are listed on that alone. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Ford 

message: I see that Aaron Bushnell has been added to this list. Does any source refer to him as a peace activist? Zanahary (talk) 04:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aaron Bushnell
Talk:Ontological supernaturalism

message: How about merging this page with supernatural?  Is there a significant distinction in content?  David Bergan 14:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: probably a good idea.  out of curiosity, are you the david bergan of "Common Sense Science?"  Ungtss 16:25, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: are you the david bergan of "Common Sense Science?"—I have no idea what you are talking about... so, likely not.  David Bergan 17:39, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: probably not indeed:).  Ungtss 18:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Vaishali district

message: "The district of Vaishali came in to existence on 12/10/1972. Earlier it was the part of old Muzzafarpur district."
If so 12 Oct or 10th Dec?  Rich   Farmbrough 00:02, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: The proposition that this was the first republic seems quite dubious.  Can the author or whoever is saying this provide any scholarly documentation?   It sounds like someone is beating the drums for India.  Scholarship I have seen suggests that nothing approaching actual elections or "rule by the people" demokratia existed.  Please provide additional substantiation. - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.122.42.13 (talk • contribs) July 17, 2006  (UTC)
:In case, you are really interested to learn more at least you may begin by reading the external links. In case, you have tagged because you heard the world Vaishali first time in your life from Wikipedia, you would require to go beyond. --Bhadani 03:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable history 

message: The name Vaishali in the old times referred to just the city, not to a district or a state. Vesali was the capital of the Vajji country, and which had its democratic parliament/senate in the city of Vaishali. I suggest splitting the page to distinguish between the current administrative disctrict, and the ancient city of the vajjians.Greetings, Sacca 16:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is really a good idea. The page Vaishali or any other properly named page may be seeded with appropriate contents. --Bhadani 17:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient city / current district

message: This article is really developing in an interesting direction.... :-) Is this the indian way? I see many email addresses in the page and big blue letters... sukhi hotu, Greetings, Sacca 13:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: interesting

message: R.N College Mk4521708 (talk) 13:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:Sheohar district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nalanda district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Country Music Association

message: It would be nice if we could actually have good country program with some older groups other than this pop country.Alabama,Kenny,Travis Tritt, Alan, Kenny,you get the picture. And no pop country singing with them.Reba,Martina
These awards aren’t for the older generation.Ricky Van Shelton,Brad P.,SawyerBrownReba,Vince Gill,There’s so many artists that have talent, it’s like the past musicians have been sent to the pasture.Please bring back real country, show the Young kids how it’s done. Dwight Yocam,Vince Gill,Lonestar.Hopefully Don Williams…,Lonestar.There’s so many! Thanks, Peety from Kansas 76.7.22.247 (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Country Specials
Talk:Warren Jeffs

message: The last sentence of Early and Family life is “He is a bad man.” I don’t think this is factual. 97.116.168.246 (talk) 17:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @97.116.168.246 he's serving life for raping kinds.  the fact he's bad is not disputed. 50.4.110.198 (talk) 02:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts 

message: Why is LDS church described as a "polygamist movement" rather than as, say, a religion or Christian denomination? 98.156.185.48 (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wacky wording
Talk:Mike Milbury

message: I have reverted an edit by an anonymous IP during a vandalism streak.  If anyone knows for a fact that Milbury really went to Colgate, please feel free to correct and comment here.  --KNHaw 18:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A closer look at the edit log times for the user (Special:Contributions/68.15.55.13) convinces me that the Colgate mod was a legit addition.  My apologies.  --KNHaw 18:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism 

message: Is there any interest in adding a "pansification" paragraph (in either the TV work or Quotes section) to address the recent Hockey Night in Canada controversy? --theInvisibleMonkey  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.217.147 (talk) 00:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "pansification" controversy  

message: I removed an edit calling the phrase "Euro-Trash" racist.  European is not a race.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scuzzletop (talk • contribs) 08:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 Olympic controversy 

message: The Mats Zuccarello section is extremely weak and doesn't belong in a biography.  Milbury doesn't use profanity in the video, and there is no abrupt cut to commercial.  In the video, the discussion ends after 3+ minutes, which is the approximate length of an in-between periods segment.  If this is included, why isn't every "controversial" comment he's ever made on TV?  This seems arbitrary and very weak.  Additionally, the second of the two links in this section links to an article that has nothing to do with the Mats Zuccarello incident or the on-air coverage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otm9 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you referring to this? https://www.boston.com/sports/bruins-blog/2011/12/17/milbury_i_dont Yojimbo1941 (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 32

message: The "diagnosis dispute" section mentions 33 affidavits. I just found a decent link here that explains that these 33 affidavits include Iyer and Hammersfar over the course of a couple of years. Some of these 33 affidavits are already covered in other sections of the article. In other words, 33 misrepresents the number of affidavits that disputed the diagnosis, because it reads as if they were additional affidavits, when then were actually part of some of the already mentioned affidavits.  Apparently 17 of the affidavits were submitted Mar 5, just before Terri died according to this. I want to move these 28 into chronological order, and I would like a link to the court's response. Anyone got anything? FuelWagon 21:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I figured it out. Greer mentions 33 affidavits in the "Oral Feeding" section. I pulled some quotes from his decision and used them in the article. I should put the other link back in though... FuelWagon 00:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 33 affidavits

message: I've got one bit left over from the "Michael Schiavo" section. 
:On June 18, 2000, Michael signed an agreement stating he would not withdraw or terminate his wife's medical care, or treatment for potential fatal infections, without prior notice to the court.
I don't think this is important enough to put in its own subsection. Does anyone have any suggestions as to where it could go? Or just leave it out? FuelWagon 00:42, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: leftover agreement

message: I think I've got all the chunks, bits, and subsections that were floating around with odd bits of information and have managed to put the entire article into mostly chronological order.  No doubt it is not perfect, but I think it qualifies as an improvement over what it was before. FuelWagon 00:56, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: hm, I just skimmed through it one more time, and I know it's an improvement. Yeah, baaaabyyy.  FuelWagon 01:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronological

message: Yo homies.  I moved the TOC on the article up a bit, as it looked like ass on an 800x600 screen alongside the Schiavo template. If you don't like that and want it back where it was, move it, don't blind revert (as I also threw in a few typo fixes), and move the Schiavo template instead. They shouldn't be alongside one another. Proto t c 23:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. thanks.FuelWagon 00:05, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I have reviewed all the edits, and it all looks good.
*Your tweak put the table of contents in a more accessible place -I tried something like this, but I got it too high and had it on top of text.
*Wayward caught some things my spell-checker missed -plus the spelling of "Judgment" that he used is more common than the one I used, even though mine was technically a correct spelling. so, all in all, the tweaks all look good and the page looks good overall too -I think. LOCK THE PAGE, for Gordon's sake already -it's fixed.--GordonWattsDotCom 03:26, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of contents
Talk:List of protests against the Vietnam War

message: Gosh this page is bad! Why not fold it into Opposition to U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War or just take it behind the barn and kill it? Paul, in Saudi 18:02, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is too short of an article for such a large topic. Someone please expand it.
Not even a date on the comment? I am wondering why the list ends with Nixon's second nauguration. --Haruo (talk) 18:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be E X  P   A     N      D          E              D 

message: I am wondering why the list ends with Nixon's second nauguration. I attended a large demonstration in DC sometime between September 1972 and May 1974. The whole reason I arrived at this page was the hope of pinning the date down a bit more precisely. My best guess would be May 1973. In any event I am almost certain that Jan. 1973 is too early, but the lack of any listings after that just has to be wrong. --Haruo (talk) 18:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why stop in January 1973?
Talk:Gopalganj district, India

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mediterranean Basin

message: This needs to be much better integrated with Mediterranean Sea. Or vice versa. --Joy [shallot] 15:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A basin is an hydrographic/orographic entity, not based on the flora. What is the point of including most of Portugal (Atlantic shore), but not Egypt? I also think that, perhaps in California are some olive trees. Is that part also of the Mediterranean Basin?.
This article needs a deep clean.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.116.23.136 (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olive trees? 

message: israel has been excluded from the list of countries in the mediterranean basin. Can you re-instate? 2A02:C7C:52B4:8B00:A591:98F4:3366:F08A (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of countries in mediterranean basin
Talk:Southern Legal Resource Center

message: * Quoting verbatim the website of an organization, besides being close to copyright violation, does not create a very encyclopedic style... please, NPOV... --Raistlin 15:42, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: There are a half dozen sources listed. Is there something specific which needs better sourcing? -Will Beback 22:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Removed tag. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 14:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unverified

message: It is noted on the WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard that the SPLC publication Intelligence Report "has been named at least twice by the Society of Professional Journalists in their Green Eyeshade journalism excellence awards  " and may be used as a Reliable Source.Mervyn Emrys (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable source 

message: *Interview with Kirk D. Lyons November 10, 2009
That is the citation in two references. Where was the interview published or broadcast? How can we verify its contents?   Will Beback  talk   21:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC
Talk:Jimmy Quinn (footballer, born 1878)

message: I would welcome any improvements, additions or expansions to this article, in particular some verification (if possible) regarding Dr John Smith's Cup Final hat-trick in 1881 and whether or not the "Munro" credited with the second goal in the first 1909 final was in fact Rangers' goalkeeper, and if he was indeed bundled into the net by Quinn in the manner I suppose. Anyone with access to contemporary newspapers (Glasgow Herald, Scotsman) may be able to resolve these points.
Likewise, anyone with easy access to those sources might like to research my surmise that a large number of Quinn's goals were vital, i.e. match-levelling or match-winning, and that this accounts for his enduring fame.
--John F Ward 12:22, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled