Talk:Money Jungle

message: :Image:Moneyjungle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Moneyjungle.jpg

message: I have changed the genre stated in the infobox back to "jazz", as several descriptions are given in the available sources, which also comment on the range of playing styles across the tracks. The question becomes whether to use all the labels that can be found (not viable or useful for a summary box), select some (subjectively), or use a superordinate. The last makes most sense to me, as anyone who wants more detail can find it in the main text. EddieHugh (talk) 13:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources you're referring to need to describe the album, not individual songs, if that's what you're referring to. All I see in the "recording and music" section is descriptions using music-theory terms, nothing about genres, so my addition was valid. Do not revert it. The question isn't answered by those options you named. It's always (for any WP:ALBUMS article) a source that explicitly says this is a "[genre] album" or the like, so unless there are conflicting sources as to the specific genre of this album... Dan56 (talk) 18:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Is "post bop" not a subjective term? I know the album is post-bop, but can it be cited? I do believe it should say Jazz first, then the subgenre of Jazz it is, for uninformed readers. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was cited, as any genre (the umbrella term-like "jazz" or the more specific "post-bop", whose Wikipedia article is under the category "jazz genres") in any article should be, otherwise it is challengeable and can be removed. Sources should come from interpretations of works by professional critiques (WP:SUBJECTIVE). The source cited from Coda (magazine) () explicitly called the album a "post-bop outing". If "post-bop" is a jazz genre, then this ("Jazz, post-bop") in the infobox would seem redundant. I would understand if there were conflicting sources saying what is specific jazz genre of this album (post-bop, hard bop, etc.), but after Googling (Books, News, Web search engines) for "bop 'Money Jungle'", I could only find that Coda source. Dan56 (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Cool. You should turn your attention to Traditional pop music/Vocal jazz. I still can't work out the derivation! Keep up the hard work. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Thanks for the additional reviews. Could you standardize the formatting of the refs? They were the same, but using the Cite tool gives a different formatting. EddieHugh (talk) 20:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

text: Done. Hope I didn't miss anything. Dan56 (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I'll check through all of them when I have time... EddieHugh (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox genre 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Money Jungle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140920061236/http://jazzhistoryonline.com/Money_Jungle.html to https://jazzhistoryonline.com/Money_Jungle.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)