lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ulf Kristersson

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 04:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: in #Early political career it says "...The congress was preceded by considerable ideological divisions between Libertarians and Conservatives. All this erupted at the congress in Lycksele, which came to be known as the Battle of Lycksele.[14] Kristersson, the Libertarian alternative, lost narrowly."
However on the Swedish wikipedia (link to the swedish article on Kristersson it says roughly the same as above, but that Kristersson represented the neoliberal—not libertarian—faction of the party. The two references in the sentences mentioning "libertarian" lead to paywalled articles so I cannot know what it is written regarding that.  Lochglasgowstrathyre (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libertarian or neoliberal 

message: An edit war (no discussion here) has been started about the article's top image. I believe the former image (left here) is more representative of this prime minister than the one which now twice has replaced it (right here.) The right one, with eyes half closed, looking sleepy and a bit silly, is just not a good portrait, regardless of size, and "European Commission" as its author is dubious (Metadata says "© EU/Christophe Licoppe"). The left one looks just like a much more alert Kristersson in action speaking. I will reinstate the former image soon unless a good reason here is given not to. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been put up for deletion (see below) and it seems to be copyrighted. I've reverted it back to the old one. Vacant0 (talk) 23:26, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO the left image is a poor image. There are weird shadows and it is not a good likeness. Sjö (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Top photo portrait
Talk:Reender Kranenborg

message: Centralized discussion about the use of the writings by Reender Kranenborg  as a source in Wikipedia articles
This religious scholar is cited in a dozen articles in WP. If he is not notable enough for its own article, we will need to submit it to an AfD. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 04:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe not a sociologist per se, but he specialized in sociology of religion and Hinduism. He has not been translated at all, besides a few articles or presentations made at the CESNUR. ≈ jossi  ≈ t • @ 22:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Some of his English language publications were listed on his homepage at the Free university of Amsterdam, but his homepage was deleted upon his retirement last year. Andries 11:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we AfD this article, then? Jossi 16:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Also, we do not know if that praise was given when he was an editor. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: No, praise of somebody's main work is very relevant I think. Andries 17:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you  certain that the praise was given during his tenure as an editor? Can you provide such a reference? Was he the main editor of that magazine? or just an occasional contributor?  ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kranenborg was one of the main editors for a long time and also a contributor. It may take a while before I have found the reference. Andries 17:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Please delete until then. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 17:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Found the reference though I slightly misremembered it. Kranenborg was heavily involved from the start in 1980 and still involved when received the the letter of praise from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) in 1992. Andries 16:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ... for this person's credentials. If you have any such sources, please add, otherwise these will be removed. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed... 

message: He was editor in chief for a magazine published by the institute for religious studies of the Free University. This is sourced. I think that this is enough to label him as a religious scholar. Andries 19:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We have zero references about his scholarship. I am sure that if he is a scholar (which I do not doubt), sources can be found. If there are no sources, we should avoid mentioning that as a fact as per WP:V. We just don't know for certain. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Religious scholar
Talk:Bo Mya

message: Added Unreferenced tags to page.Catfurball (talk) 20:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Added tags
Talk:Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve

message: Is not part of the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve as implied from the text ("Zapata Falls is a waterfall on the southeast side of the park"). The park web site offers visit there as part of Nearby Attractions. אביהו (talk) 16:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed text & image of falls. Section needs some refs. Brian W. Schaller (talk) 19:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zapata Falls
Talk:Bill Mosienko

message: I know sometimes article writers are picky about the lead so I figure I  should explain my edit. I think that as a summary, it should be chronological but also bring the biggest facts forward. Mosienko is by far best associated with the hat-trick, so I made it the second part, right after the first sentence that basically gives context. The second paragraph now resumes his career in the NHL and WHL, while the last is about the honours he received later. Hope this works. Maxim(talk) 01:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. Resolute 05:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 
Talk:Nuclear force

message: The term  has been historically the common name for this topic, but does not currently even get a mention in the article lead, despite the term redirecting to this article.
This is just plain ridiculous IMO. Interested in other views. Andrewa (talk) 07:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it, lets see if it remains.  I think the main issue is its potential confusion with Strong interaction.  But I agree it is its historical name (citation needed, however!). Bdushaw (talk) 03:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong nuclear force 

message: In nuclear physics, the fm unit is the Fermi. Conveniently fm sounds like Fermi, and also comes out femtometer. (Or femtometre, depending on where you are.) I suspect also in high energy physics. Gah4 (talk) 07:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  fm 

message: Quarks are likely to be separated by far smaller distances than a neutron diameter. Because they move 0.8 C and higher the Electromagnetic field intensity will have an intensity pulse in the direction of motion each time a quark cycles past. Let the quarks cycle in a roughly fixed pattern of two like quarks separated by the opposite sign quark with one like quark leading and one trailing. The magnetic field intensity wakes they will produce will cause magnetic curving forces that are balanced with one of the other quarks causing a curving force and the remaining causing a straightening force, true for each of the three quarks. Speed of light causes an additional barrier stabilizing the structure. Does this type of thinking open the door to electromagnetic forces being involved in quark attraction?
Also note that while a trio of quarks in a second proton sits inside the intensity wake of a first proton. The  repulsion from highest intensity is towards the other proton. This would explain why at particular short distance the electromagnetic force is strong and attractive. Does this kind of thinking suggest a way that relativistic electromagnetic field forces could hold two protons together?
On a distantly related note when two wires attract an alternate theory is that the electrons seek the less dense fields behind other electrons. (To me this is far more likely than the favored theory of more dense packed protons due to relativistic shortening.)    Bill field pulse (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quark Motion and quark distances
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Molecular economics

message: http://www.alzforum.org/new/detail.asp?id=1187
http://www.laserradio.com/metro324.pdf
http://aroundcny.com/technofile/texts/bit052202.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfDariusAlexander (talk • contribs) 23:51, December 1, 2005
All of those have nothing to do with what is discussed on the article page. Peyna 04:57, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve

message: Is it 7,167,192 acres as is written at the opening section, or is it 7,263,000 acres as is written in the Geography section (and the article about Gates of the Arctic Wilderness)? אביהו (talk) 10:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the size of Gates of the Arctic Wilderness? 

message: I fixed the bad link in the preview of the park map pic, but I do not know enough to fix the bad link in the enlarged pic. If anyone knows how and can make the repair, it would be appreciated. Hearnesj (talk) 23:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Park Map Link Issue
Talk:Guibourtia

message: What is "Congo copal"? Tedernst | Talk 05:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:The Amber Spyglass

message: It seems that Amber Spyglass was originally published by David Fickling (as credited in the article) .... At that time David Fickling was an imprint of Random House .... David Fickling is now an independent publisher outside Random House (who appear to be the current publishers of all three parts of HDM). In this circumstance, WHO should be credited as publisher?. A quick search suggests similar problems may exist with the other two books of the trilogy. Pincrete (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is the publisher 

message: Having just listened to the book again, the plot summary is pretty poor. Or rather the article is missing anything that reviewers or Pullman himself have said giving an analysis of the book, its themes, etc. There are some hints in the controversy section, but not enough. Father Gomez failed to kill Lyra, but was there still a Fall? And the result of that? Is there a message in the book? I've got my own ideas which are of course irrelevant, but we should have a section on the issues/metaphors, etc. Doug Weller talk 14:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a bit in Dust (His Dark Materials) and in the main article on the trilogy. The story is about the Church trying to rid the universe of dust and make all intelligent beings "innocent", read "ignorant". Lyra represents Eve and the Church wants her dead to prevent a second Fall. The trilogy presents the Fall as a positive act of maturation and it prevents the destruction of Dust. All of that needs expanding and sourcing. Doug Weller talk 10:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So fix it! Popcornduff (talk) 10:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, when I'm off ArbCom and reduce my 13,500 watchlist, but I'm mainly interested in archaeology. I just happened to come along to this. You edit these articles quite a bit, if you agree with me maybe you'll find time. Doug Weller talk 15:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs more than a plot summary
Talk:Halabi (surname)

message: I also know the spelling "El Heliebi", very common in Austria and maybe Germany too, does this refere also to families from Halab? Furthermore i think its importent to have arcticles about the origins of family names here. And I think that we really have to do with at least a few different families originating from Halab (Aleppo). Christopher Jaritz (talk) 11:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  more spellings
Talk:Noma, Florida

message: The following text was at the bottom of this page. I don't know what it is, but it does not seem to belong to Noma, Florida.
----
NOMA, once the largest christmas decor manufacturer in the world
The National Outfit Manufacturer's Association was officially started early in 1925. Accounts of the number of companies who joined vary from thirteen to fifteen, but I do know that these companies were involved: The C.D. Wood Electric company, Szel's Five Seas Trading Company, The Matchless Corporation, the decorative lighting division of Deal Electric, Franco, the decorative lighting division of Monowatt and The Henry Hyman Company. The United States Electric Company, better known as USALITE, joined for a short time but then broke away. A major holdout was the M. Propp Company, who continued (for a time, at least) on their own.
----
•DanMS 05:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous text
File talk:Niger-Congo.png

message: The yellow colors for Niger-Congo A and B are almost indistinguishable. Could we get colors that differ more? --JWB 05:36, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be updating the maps on African language families in the near future, and I will try to remedy this. Thanks for commenting! — mark ✎ 08:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases

message: "Award-winning military and civilian scientists, highly trained support personnel, and unique, state-of-the-art research facilities make USAMRIID a critical resource for the Army, the Department of Defense, and the United States."
This statement sounds unreasonably bold. *Just a note* Peoplesunionpro 05:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely it's a statement of fact, if the scientists have won awards, the support personnel underwent a lot of training and their research facilities are state-of-the-art? :o) I'm nothing to do with USAMRIID (I'm not even American) but, as noone else has commented, I'm gonna remove the NPOV tag. — OwenBlacker 04:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There should be a Popular Culture section, I think, which describes some of the more notable movies and books which have the USAMRIID as a major part of its story line. Often the MRIID is depicted as the bag guy, a fascist right wing military organization, but there are movies and books which cover what we really do (which isn't anything at all sinister.) BiologistBabe (talk) 17:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been in the field too long. Almost 3 years, I see. BiologistBabe (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture Section 

message: Just wanted to let y'all know that there is a pretty widespread theory in China that Sars Cov- 2 originated from this lab in June/ July 2019. And that that is the reason why the CDC shut it down for not complying with biosafety standards in August 2019. Could this somehow be included in this article? Or is it too speculative? It's a pretty prevasive theory.--Woman on a mission👶🏼👦🏼👧🏼🙅🏼🕵🏼‍♀️👩‍💻 22:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sars Cov - 2 came from here?
Talk:Pentagon City

message: Any more history about the area? Or is there much to tell besides the former industrial zones? I'm guessing it's only been called "Pentagon City" for a short period of time. FWIW I have an old street map (late '50s or so) that shows a point between present-day Pentagon City and Crystal City labeled as "South Washington." -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 05:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

message: There was a story floating around MCI in the early-1990s that the company owned the land under much of Pentagon City's core, including the two office towers at 601 and 701 S. 12th Street.  The story went that MCI had to sell the property under the towers (PCY I and PCY II), which the company had built in the early 80s, in order to make the payroll.  Anyone know if there's any truth to the tale? Seandc
:Never heard of it before, but it seems highly unlikely to be true.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Property 

message: Marked for cleanup, and expansion. Article advertises for shopping venues, and residential options. This reads more like an advertisement of the travel options and places to visit, than a informational article. There are two sections that particularly require expansion: Shopping and Residential... Should shopping even be a section?
--TRL (talk) 02:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plenty more residential options within the Pentagon City area, should any specifically be named (advertising)... either name them all, or name none. The shopping section again sounds very tour guide-ish, "please come visit our mall, and check out these apartments..."--TRL (talk) 19:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added some of the other residential options in the area. Removed The River House complex, as it is part of Arlington Ridge.Arlington Ridge in Wikimapia. Removed the residential section expansion tag. The article still reads like a travel guide... due to the Shopping section.--TRL (talk) 21:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you realize that Pentagon City is notable for being a shopping district, and as such, it's kind of difficult, if not impossible, to not give that element of Pentagon City a significant section.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in Pentagon City. It is much more than a shopping district and contains a much larger variety than it is often credited. I have removed the marking as I expanded. The marking was added to remind for followup, and encourage others to be bold.--TRL (talk) 23:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travel Guide/Sections need Expansion
Talk:Brigham City, Utah

message: There is one high school, one middle school, one intermediate school'...
Aren't "middle school" and "intermediate school" the same thing?  They certainly redirect to the same article...  Alai 05:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake, school district link reveals all.  Tried to make this more clear.  Alai 06:19, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Thank you! You are the only other person I know who has gotten that correct. I know, I think I'm the one that put Sardine Canyon in the article, but that's because I didn't know what it was really called, so I put it as Sardine, even though I knew that it wasn't. Is Box Elder Canyon really its proper name? bob rulz 02:11, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle and intermediate school 
Talk:Interstate 235 (Iowa)

message: I feel like it may be notable to add the development's effect on Af-Am neighborhoods in Des Moines.
http://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1407&context=annals-of-iowa  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.228.164.10 (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I 235 Construction Controversy 
Talk:Curio

message: This page needs to become a disambiguation page.--Rockero 06:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (This page has become a disambiguation page.) -A876 (talk) 17:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I thought that these would be helpful additions to the Objects section:
*Novelty items
*Souvenirs or memorabilia
*Collectables
*Tchotchkes
*"Indian" arts and crafts
*Antiquities
*Minerals
*Fossils
*Curio shops, or curiosity shops, are gift shops, souvenir shops, etc.
Though there is no article "curio shop" or "curiosity shop", places that sell curios might have some idea what curios are. A Wikipedia search on "curio shop" or "curiosity shop" finds some named places and other info - I wanted to also link to such a search.
History:
• I imagine that people look here to (uh) find what they are looking for. This section does not direct to what curios really are, or things that can be curios.
• So, one fine day I [tried to] add links to things that are curios. I didn't stumble upon a definitive definition (WP:RS...). But "curio" has common uses, so it is probably difficult to find good and agreeing opinions on what is (or is not) a curio. Adding valid examples might get us closer to knowing.
• They were removed, edit comment "one blue link per entry". But the unhelpful edit didn't break up the entry, it deleted the additions.
• So I put them in again, on multiple lines, edit comment "'Include exactly one navigable (blue) link' per entry. okay." (I acknowledged the previous edit comment (only), quoting the rule from WP:wherever)
• They were removed again, edit comment "cleanup, remove items where curio is not mentioned in linked article". Oh, so that must be the "criterion" to survive. It looks like strictness wins over usefulness. (Form over function.) (WP:BREAKNORULES)
• Maybe there is a useful way to include these things as curios. (Without having to, for ugly example, edit the "Tchotchke" article to mention that tchotchkes can be curios or curios can be tchotchkes.)
This [preexisting, weak but innocuous] line also got removed:
::Curios, or curiosities, are strange or interesting objects that evoke curiosity.
Here is what is the section links (at the moment):
::Objects
::*Bric-à-brac, lesser objets d'art for display
::*Cabinet of curiosities, a room-sized collection or exhibit of curios or curiosities
::*Collectables
::*Curio cabinet, a cabinet constructed for the display of curios
-A876 (talk) 17:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Objects
Talk:Wytches (album)

message: I was going to hatnote this with another article, but then I noticed the lack of coverage on the article and couldn't find anything to show that it merited an article. I was going to move the comic series to the Wytches title, but decided that this would be better served as a redirect to the disambiguation page for witch since it is a commonly used spelling for witch in general and there are more than a few articles on Wikipedia that have this particular spelling in their name. It'd make more sense for this to go to the disambiguation page than to any one specific page. If anyone can find sources for this article I'm not particularly opposed to them un-redirecting it (however I would argue that the main name Wytches should remain a redirect to the disambiguation page), but otherwise it should just redirect to the main page for the band. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:Marcel Pronovost

message: I suspect that in 1969-70, he may not have coached all 72 games for Tulsa, if he managed to still play 7 games for the Leafs that year. Granted the NHL then was playing 76-game seasons, but still seems unlikely that would allow him to play 7 games for Toronto and coach 72 for Tulsa. Echoedmyron (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm not entirely sure how that worked, but in two sources I have, he is credited as the coach in all 72 games.  It is very likely a case of the leagues simply not being as granular in the statistics as they are now. Similarly, Pronovost was the coach on the bench for eight games with the Red Wings in 1980, but Ted Kennedy is officially credited as the coach of those games. Resolute 03:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaching stats