lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:.454 Casull

message: It is my understanding that the .45 Schofield can be fired in 454 chambers just as the .45 Colt can be.  ANy comments?--Counsel (talk) 22:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The .45 Schofield article says that it can usually be fired in .45 Colt chambers. There may be a unacceptable difference in rim thickness. YMMV. Safety first, always. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  .45 Schofield 

message: what about the 380 ACP ammo. ur gonna need a new picture Dyl pykle69 (talk) 14:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  380 ACP 
Talk:Pitcairnioideae

message: Unlike the lithophytes in other subfamilies, these are saxicolous?  That's not clear to me. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: John - I moved that page to the correctly spelled one and I think I changed all the pages which link to it.  Feel free to resume the correct spelling with the additional i if you add more genera to that subfamily.  This page could use a photo, too.  Mmcknight4 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't think this wording in the description sectionis appropriate:
"...Their blooms contain dry capsules with small, wingless seeds..."
As I understand the term, "Bloom" refers to the flower or inflorescence before it has set seed.  Perhaps the better term would be "infructescence," with a definition or a link to the definition Infructescence.  If we want to avoid specialized vocabulary we could say something like "after pollination and ripening, the mature flower head contains..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmeiss (talk • contribs) 13:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of vocabulary
Talk:Rail system (firearms)

message: with Rail Integration System. They seem to be pretty identical articles  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpiebtanz (talk • contribs) 20:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?  

message: Picatinny Rail, are these 2 articles talking about the same thing? See this link, meaning and functions is quite the same https://www.brownells.com/.aspx/lid=10724/GunTechdetail/Picatinny_Rails__Weaver_Rails__What_s_The_Difference_  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof.Marlin (talk • contribs) 14:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are they same? 

message: Added  additional information and images for multiple rails types and in basic order of development. Working on building the article. No, this should not be merge with Rail Integration System. I will need help adding citations correctly which can all be found from wikipedia article links for terms used to describe items.Explanations may need better grammar for clarity of example.
Each type of rail is being linked to its page, images added, along with added information of various types of rails and the combining of of types. Bare with me as I edit more into the article. This stub needed improvement and details a long time ago.
2602:306:CE27:DC90:3DFA:E65B:704A:4C7E (talk) 10:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive edits from stub September 2017

message: The old, 
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Needs to be removed, this article has been improved and repair several times over from the wikimedia deletionists destroying pages, citations have been added....  God forbid a non account holder dares do anything as "Be Bold" and fix that. 2600:1702:1590:9A30:F903:6E9F:1BF8:8AF (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of top Template from 2017 and 2009 originally
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 4506

message: does 4506-1 & 4506 use the same barrel 24.96.16.125 (talk) 19:15, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: They're the same length, but given the nature of these pistols there's no guarantee one barrel might work with a different slide. If you can find a slide/barrel combination you're better off. Otherwise they require a gunsmith to fit them correctly. At least as far as I know. Intothatdarkness 20:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  smith& wesson 4506
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 4006

message: Here's a place to list sources concerning use by the park police. Rezin (talk) 00:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As I mentioned on your talk page, the sources need to have been published. Department memorandums probably don't qualify unless they've been published, such as on the department's website. If they have, then just link to them. Photos are under different rules - they don't have to have been published, but they do have to have been taken by you so that you can release the copyright. As for the mechanism, you can follow this link  then make sure you understand the license agreement. Rezin (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

text: It occurs to me that a nice clear photograph of the pistol could convey a lot of information, especially about the markings, making written sources unneccessary for that material. 'A picture's worth a thouasand words.' Rezin (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  California State Parks
Talk:Brian Robertson, 1st Baron Robertson of Oakridge

message: A list of titles has recently been added, referenced to http://www.unithistories.com/units_index/default.asp?file=../officers/personsx.html - unfortunately that is a front page which doesn't mention Robertson. By navigating through, and guessing a bit, I've found http://www.unithistories.com/officers/Army_officers_R01.html#Robertson_BH This does not support all of the new information, in particular, the final entry:
*1961-1974: General The Rt. Hon. The Lord Robertson of Oakridge, Bt., GCB, GBE, KCMG, KCVO, DSO, MC
You don't get "The Lord" together with "Bt."; and "The Lord" is a form of address; his title was "Baron". --Redrose64 (talk) 15:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles 

message: When Robertson was the Chairman of the British Transport Commission, Henry Fairlie wrote a satirical four-stanza poem entitled "Bold Sir Brian Robertson", reproduced in  --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold Sir Brian Robertson
Talk:Thomas DiNapoli

message: A recent editor, who was largely making good edits, though perhaps a bit too fawning/promotional, shares a name with a Press Secretary of the subject of the article. User advised to post on article talk page to request edits. JesseRafe (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (January 2023) 

message: Hello, I have a COI. I previously added tables with the election results section of the page at the bottom for 2018 and 2022. Could the editor on this page reinstate them? Change should be in the history of the page. Please let me know. Thank you - Mary Mary Mueller (talk) 21:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Request
Talk:Avelignese

message: I think that if the Avelignese Pony is just an Italian version of the Haflinger, then it should just be merged with the Haflinger article.  Really, this horse is just a bigger version of the Haflinger.  They have the same origin, they were developed in the same places, etc., and really they are no different except for size. Ben Swanson 21:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Does anyone else find many differences in your research about this pony?  Please respond. Ben Swanson 21:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences
Talk:Sony camcorders

message: I take umbrage at the tone of this article that implies the somehow Sony created the very first miniDV camcorder and pioneered the format. That is completely untrue. The miniDV format was the result of all VHS and Video8 manufacturers coming together to form a consortium to make a uniform digital format for consumer video to prevent yet another "Beta/VHS" war. Both Apple and Microsoft were invited to participate in standard setting. Bill Gates declined, which is why the Apple firewire interface became the computer connection.
It was never Sony only. Even the DCR VX1000 was not Sony's first pro-sumer miniDV, that distinction goes to the DCR VX700. By the time the VX1000 came to market, Canon had its more famous XL1, and Panasonic was shipping 3 chip prosumer miniDV to its industrial customers. Most of the other manufacturers shunned the prosumer market because of its small size and brought a pletorea of consumer singe CCD miniDV models in 1995. After 1995 the only analog consumer cameras sold by any company were already produced warehouse inventory. Even JVC, inventor of VHS, stopped licensing new products and made VHS a free product to any manufacture (VCRs continued to be made after the miniDV introduction).
While I understand this is a Sony product page, there needs to be a tempering of the marketing hype.
BTW the reason for the special Century optics was not to commemorate the special "quality" of the Sony lenses but rather the fact that Sony decided to not use industry standard filter threads and came up with a non-standard bayonet filter mount instead. The DSR150 and DSR170 are not miniDV camcorders, they are DVCam with miniDV compatibility and can only be serviced by the industrial division.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.188.35.242 (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sony Bologne 

message: Please provide information for the newest Sony camcorders such as the HDR-UX5/HC5 and HDR-UX7/HC7. --Jack Zhang 19:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer models needed 

message: Is it possible to rename this page "Sony High-Definition Camcorders" and add info on the professional HVR-Z1U/HVR-A1U/HVR-V1U/HVR-HD1000U cameras? --Jack Zhang 08:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because we need to have one page with a canonical list of every sony camcorder, not just the HD ones. - Mr Forgot my password.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.182.254 (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Rename? 

message: Can merge this stub page?: Sony DSR-570.HarmonZach (talk) 11:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge stub page 

message: Can merge this stub page?: Sony PMW-EX1. Todonite (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge stub page (2)
Talk:Erdinger

message: "a wheat beer that can be drank straight from the bottle"
um, pretty sure every beer can be and is drank straight from the bottle.
Good beer though!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellowjournalism (talk • contribs) 22:31, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erdinger Champ 

message: They also have a seasonal Oktoberfest hefeweizen. It has a different malt profile for the season than a normal hefeweizen or weizenbier.Halconen (talk) 21:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  current varieties
Talk:Francis Shoemaker

message: "While Shoemaker was an organizer for the Nonpartisan League in 1920 he was attacked by the pastor of his church as Shoemaker had claimed that despite not being physically fit to enter the army and having a dependent wife was drafted with him being the only married man in the area to be so, but did not appeal the decision."
Rewrite for clarity, I think that this sentence is trying to say:
# Shoemaker was drafted, but appealed the decision because he wasn't physically fit and had a dependent wife
# His pastor criticized the appeal
# I'm not sure?
2601:8C3:857F:BFC0:D0DB:982:C73B:5202 (talk) 06:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify / rewrite for clarity (Shoemaker was attacked)
Talk:Gauting

message: nice job. I "fixed" some of the English syntax.  several of the villages have links, and at least one of them is correct.  Hausen leads to a disambiguation page, and I couldn't tell if the proper one is listed.  You might follow up on that and fix those links.  Needs pictures, if possible, maybe of one or two of the important buildings, the Celtic ruins, etc.  I also added additional links to other wiki articles.  Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: a bit new here, wanted to clarify before editing. would it do to add a section on Gauting sanitorium under "history"? it is mentioned extensively in jdc archives https://search.archives.jdc.org/notebook_ext.asp?item=672837&site=ideaalm&lang=ENG&menu=1 as well as in the yivo archives http://www.yivoarchives.org/index.php?p=pages/services_scope_of_collections, and also comes up in several recounting of holocaust survivors. I'm honestly surprised there's not a section for it already. 147.235.196.200 (talk) 10:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  gauting sanatorium
Talk:Hanover Square (Manhattan)

message: if it's triangular in shape, then it's not really a square; now is it? --209.104.55.28 (talk) 22:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, like Peretz Square, Sherman Square, Herald Square, Times Square, Verdi Square, and near half the "squares" on the island.  Jim.henderson (talk) 20:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

message: The article on Park Row (Manhattan) also claims that square was once Printing House Square, and it mentions printing enterprises, while this article doesn't, which seems odd for a square that once had this moniker.  Is it Hanover Square part of Park Row?  If so the two articles intercorrelate somehow as this article develops. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Printing House Square
Talk:14 Wall Street

message: I had edited in that floors 32-37 are located within the pyramid roof and are only used for storage but it was removed for lack of citation. How am I supposed to cite something like that? Other than say a few photographs showing that 31 is the top floor and 32-37 are actually within the pyramid, I can't think of any public document that would contain this. Overall a trivial detail, but I think it should be noted that while the building contains 37 floors (38 including elevator lift room) only 31 are useable. Drumz0rz (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, we cannot accept information that you are personally aware of that can't be corroborated with a citation from a reliable source.  That's because all information must be verifiable by other editors, and they cannot do so if there's no citation.  You'd be surprised, though, at what kinds of information is out there, so I suggest you try a Google search and see what comes up. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Upper Floors
Talk:Buttonwood Agreement

message: If it wasn't named the New York Stock & Exchange Board until 1817, what was it called before then? Dpbsmith (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was it called before 1817? 

message: Does the physical document still exist? ike9898 (talk) 14:56, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does. I just updated the page. Greenwayfriend (talk) 01:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical document 

message: I believe that Travis Handak does not belong and the 24th signatory is Bernard Hart. This list is in alphabetic order. An alternative would be the order on the document. See previous citation. Before I make changes does anyone wish to comment? Greenwayfriend (talk) 01:06, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Signatories
Talk:Union councils of Pakistan

message: The article says that union councils are part of a tehsil or city district, but does that mean a union council is only a subdivision of a tehsil or city district, in which case they couldn't cross tehsil boundaries?  Or are union councils another layer (if even still below the level of tehsil) which can cross tehsil lines? --Criticalthinker (talk) 09:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone able to answer these questions?  Also, are tehsils and city districts entirely divided into union councils, or just where there are urban and urban-type settlements? --Criticalthinker (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Level of Governance 

message: 2 duties of union concil? In urdu 39.53.119.162 (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pak study
Talk:1 New York Plaza

message: probably worth putting in something about the August, 2001 steampipe explosion. -- Vonfraginoff 11:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  steampipe explosion 

message: You should also include the December 2001 fire and explosion. I think it was December 1st 2001 ToesUpTommy (talk) 20:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 Fire and Explosion
Talk:Hall–Carpenter Archives

message: I have started to trim the text from Oliver's original description for the LSE website, I'll continue to trim as it has started off rather too long for a wiki page. I also hope to add some more detail on current projects as the archive is planning to celebrate its 25th anniversary. -- Ashley VH 13:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: I find the categorization a bit confusing to follow at times so I thought I'd try and work it out. Notes about category structure can be maintained here for this page to justify changes (please add to this if you change the page categorization).
;Hierarchy of LGBT categories as in relation to this page (categories used shown in bold):
:Category:LGBT
*:Category:LGBT history
**:Category:LGBT history of the United Kingdom
*:Category:LGBT culture
**:Category:LGBT in Europe
***:Category:LGBT culture in the United Kingdom
****:Category:LGBT history of the United Kingdom
*:Category:LGBT organizations
**:Category:LGBT rights organizations
:Category:Sexuality
*:Category:Human sexuality
**:Category:Gender
***:Category:Gender studies (could go here as an alternate)
****:Category:Queer theory
*****:Category:Queer studies
:Category:History
*:Category:Historical documents
**:Category:Archives
***:Category:Archives by country
****:Category:Archives in the United Kingdom
*****:Category:Archives in England
--Ashley VH 18:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category notes 

message: Set up a few obvious redirect pages such as Hall Carpenter archive and also LAGNA on the assumption that the HCA page is probably sufficient.-- Ashley VH 19:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect pages 

message: Renamed web page to title case on HCA request. -- Ashley VH 22:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 
Talk:Requisite organization

message: Those two are two completely different topics, hence can't be merged.
:It is not obvious to me that they are different topics. It looks like two different authors have invented two different bits of jargon for pretty much the same thing. Jaques is usually regarded as a serious author, while Peter is usually regarded as a humorist.--RichardVeryard 23:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose the merge.  Requisite Organization focuses on the structure of organizations while hierarchy deals more with the placement of the people (it seems to assume the hierarchy already exists while RO examines if and how the hierarchy and other structures exist).  However, almost suggested merging with Elliott Jaques because it seemed to be an article on him and his views (I altered the tone to try to remove this). RJFJR 20:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hierarchiology is defined as "the social science concerned with the basic principles of hierarchically organized systems". This seems to be exactly what Jaques was concerned with. However, I agree that Peter's discussion of hierarchiology fails to address the structural principles, but concentrates on the (humorous aspects of) placement of people within an existing hierarchy. In which case, it should probably be merged with Peter Principle instead. --RichardVeryard 18:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to Merge with [[Hierarchiology]]

message: There have been a series of unexplained edits over the past few months, which have mostly messing around with the format. As a result, a number of external links and categories were lost. (I only spotted this when the page was automatically tagged as uncategorized.) I am reverting to an old version prior to these edits. I have not checked the quality of the external links - some of them may well be linkspam - but I wanted to restore the integrity of the page before making any further improvements. --RichardVeryard 09:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: The opening paragraph makes the claim that some of Jaques' conclusions about organizations run counter to the predominant views of OD, and also that Requisite Organization is somewhat controversial as a result.  I would like to see the Requisite Organization page expanded, probably with a new section, to explain that claim in more detail.  For example, 
* Which conclusions run counter to OD?  
* Which conclusions are shared?  
* Who has spoken out for or against a particular conclusion?  
Let me be clear, I don't disagree with the claim - I just don't understand it.
I would write the comparison, but I'd be starting from zero.  I have no background in Requisite organization or Organization Development.  My hope is that someone more familiar with the subject could make quick work of it.
--TravisM (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with Organization Development
Talk:Paradox of the Court

message: There is no real paradox here.  The only problem is the argument made by Protagoras.  His argument isn't about the actual contract, or whether Euathlus has actually won a case yet.  He is making a meta-argument to the court that no matter what the outcome, he will be the winner.  As is the case so often in a self referential argument, it cuts both ways, and doesn't actually clarify the issue.
In reality, the court would ignore Protagoras' argument, and decide in favor of Euathlus.  Clearly Euathlus has not yet won ANY cases, and therefore does not (yet) owe Protagoras his payment.  After this case is done, Euathlus has won a case, and a second case would be decided in favor of Protagoras.
If the court were to decide the first case in favor of Protagoras, it would result in a contradiction.  Euathlus would not have won any cases, yet still would have paid his fee.
To really avoid any type of contradiction, Protagoras could (frivolously) sue Euathlus for something unrelated (e.g. defamation of character), claiming huge damages (giving Euathlus motivation to win).  If Protagoras wins this case, he doesn't care about the tutor fee.  If he loses (as expected), he is then set up to easily win the case regarding his tutor fee.
-- Tony  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.177.36.73 (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No Real Paradox
Talk:Vitalij Kuprij

message: This page seems somewhat taken from  ... Rewrite.
thedarkestclear Talk 22:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added many tags to this already, and I've only scratched the surface. This article is biased, boastful, and totally unsourced. Fix it or it gets wiped. ReignMan (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, right? I didn't see your remark at first, but I did a lot of stuff to the article so that it is much more neutral and more encyclopedic. However, sources could be cool still. The article is in a much better state now than it was. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 05:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased!