Talk:Regia Marina

message: This article is easily long enough and detailed enough to warrant no less than B-class. It has pictures, and goes beyond the prose content history of the navy to provide an extensive list of Italian ships, by class. However, I would think that if this article were to be improved at all, it would require significant expansion in just about every section, particularly in the pre-WWII sections. I realize that Italy was a newly formed nation at the end of the 19th century, and the navy was thus new as well, but surely there is more to be said about its activity before and during WWI than just a few sentences. LordAmeth 11:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment

message: Why is the section about corvettes in WW2 all in italian? Could someone please translate it? I think it is copied from italian wiki.--QueenCake (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It actually appears to be in French, to further the mystery. Benea (talk) 05:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian? 

message: I found some stuff on a now-defunct page that could live here, so I've added it. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo's, attack on new york

message: The image :Image:HMS Queen Elizabeth (Queen Elizabeth-class battleship).jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:HMS Queen Elizabeth (Queen Elizabeth-class battleship).jpg

message: Someone has changed the words “Regia Marina” in this article to “Royal Navy” or “Italian Royal Navy” for some reason.</br>
This is just confusing; there already is a "Royal Navy" in the English language, and it isn’t this one. And use of the term Regia Marina is a commonplace in reliable sources that cover the subject (Roskill springs to mind); most histories of the First and Second world war do the same.</br>
So I’ve changed it back. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name 

message: Substituted at 04:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: By putting in the  tag, I was not questioning the accuracy of the claim that Italy had the forth largest navy at the time--that does sound about right.  I'm guessing the top three were:  (1) Britain (2) Japan (3) U.S.?  It would be nice to spell that out and have a source that documents in and even better gives statistics comparing the various fleets.  --David Tornheim (talk) 01:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forth largest navy 

message: About the Italian lack of radar, the text says:
"range finders and gunnery control devices for night combat were not incorporated. Regarding such devices, Cavagnari emphasized "not wanting traps in your way"." 
Since Cavagnari's choice of words may sound strange, I would like to add that while "traps" is a good literal translation for the Italian "trappole", the same "trappole" is used colloquially in Italian with the meaning of "contraptions", "complicated machinery or gadget".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.239.3.252 (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "traps in your way"