Talk:Sajan (Kikinda)

message: Your source (Jovan Pejin) is well known for his righteousness. His invectives against minorities are well documented (English , , French ,  Hungarian  and Serbian ). 
If we compare Pejin's ideas with your claims, the similarity is noticeable. So, may I call you extreme right wing nationalist? 
Your library is full with nationalistic books of nationalist authors, and you call me "one of the greatest nationalists on Wikipedia and your hate towards Serbs is just amazing: for you all Serbs are "murders, fascists, etc", but if you compare how many murders and fascist you can find in your own nation, you will see that Serbs are angels." Are they really? Bendeguz 22:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to link you provided, Pejin said "that Slovaks, Romanians and, above all, Hungarians, were colonists and that there are no Croats in Vojvodina, but only Bunjevci". How this can be described as "insult for minorities"? In the first half of the 18th century almost 100% of population of Vojvodina were Serbs, Bunjevci, and Šokci and all others were indeed colonists. Why would be insult for you to mention from where and when your ancestors came here? Sorry, but I really do not understand this... PANONIAN (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who talk about 18th century? Pejin also talks about 20th and 21th century. Please harmonize with him, he is your mentor. Bendeguz 13:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link you provided do not say that Pejin talk about 20th and 21th century... PANONIAN (talk) 16:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The link says nothing." da su Slovaci, Rumuni i pre svega Mađari u Vojvodini kolonisti"(present) Bendeguz 23:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is not present. :) Perhaps you should learn Serbian better. :))) To somebody with not good knowledge of Serbian it might look like present, but it can be both, present and a past. PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

text: And the best thing in your sources is that the person that described Pejin as nationalist is named Laslo Vegel. Coincidence or not, mister Bendeguz? PANONIAN (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Végel László is the conscience of Central Europe and Serbia too. Are you dyslexic? Did you learn in first class that you must read every word. Read every word and don't pull the words from context. Bendeguz 13:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is he really a conscience or he just received personally what Pejin said? PANONIAN (talk) 16:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text:  Pejin is just a mouthpiece of extremists in Serbia. Végel whips Hungarian and Serb POVs also. Bendeguz 23:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why Pejin is an "extremist"? He only spoke about history. I do not see that he said there that Serbs should do something bad to minorities or anything similar. PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

text: And finally, I did not said that "Serbs are angels" but that "Serbs are angels compared with some members of your own nation". Try to notice a difference, ok? PANONIAN (talk) 02:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Can you compare apples with bananas? If you wrote that "Serb devils are angels compared with Hungarian devils' in this case it is comparable and nothing else. Our little Erwin. Bendeguz 13:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not spoke about devils but about other things as well, for example Serbs in the former Kingdom of Hungary did not had 10% of rights that Hungarians today have in Serbia and that is real comparison about angels and devils, mister Bendeguz. PANONIAN (talk) 16:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Your equivocation is hopeless. Primarily you talked us about murders and fascists and now about rights. What is next? Bendeguz 23:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What ever come to my mind, mister Bendeguz. :))) PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Angels with dirty faces

message: Whom you two want to trick accusing me for nationalism? The same dispute that you have with me, you also have with Slovaks and Romanians. Is Serbian nationalism guilty for that too? Are Serbs guilty because people like you want to create Greater Hungary and therefore have disputes with half of their neighbours? I do not think so... PANONIAN (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that right? Well, you may notice that I did not touched at all part of the article that present "your" Cuman (or what ever) theory. It is you, mister Öcsi, who do not allow that another theory is presented here. PANONIAN (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: For Öcsi and Bendeguz