lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tuchulcha

message: It couldn't be any clearer that Tuchulcha is not a female deity.
If we see the available online pictures from the Tomb of Orcus (,) we clearly see a bearded figure with "Tuchulcha" written above him, not her. We see him again here. There's just no "female" Tuchulcha.
As I've been saying all along (See Talk:Charun), these annoying twat websites, full of make-believe rot, pervade the internet while clearly contradicting the actual artifacts. The following sites are therefore misinforming people of more junk:
*http://www.pantheon.org/articles/t/tuchulcha.html
*http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/roman-mythology.php?deity=TUCHULCHA
*http://amanda61483.tripod.com/id12.html
The list goes on and on if you search in Google because plagiarism and bad sources are a common theme in the 21st century. So I'm not trying to be cranky when I justly say, "People who don't question what they read just shouldn't have free reign of the Wikipedia, despite good intentions." Ignorance is never a good intention. Parroting people without questioning is irresponsible.
--Glengordon01 07:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuchulcha is a male deity, not female
Talk:Midland Bank

message: The Midland Bank working in Loughborough was still using Midland branding as long after as 1996-97.
Hi! Perhaps you havent read the article more carefully.. "Midland Bank was renamed HSBC Bank in 1999" Hopwas2007 (talk) 18:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quickly Branded? 

message: What about the purchase of the Belfast Banking Company Limited in the 1920's? Gavin Lisburn (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belfast Banking Company 

message: What about the purchase of Northern Bank in the 1970's and the subsequent sale of same due to the failure of Crocker? Gavin Lisburn (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Bank 

message: Time for the mega HSBC to de-merge its UK business and restore its brand name and independence.
-Better for shareholders
-Better for accountholders
-Better for UK Businesses
Freedom1968 (talk) 22:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HSBC should restore the Midland Bank brand 
Talk:Lübeck-Siems

message: On Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lübeck-Siems several Wikipedians have questioned whether this article is well named. The subject appears to be a substation, the name appears to be an area or suburb. This seems to me to be guesswork; There are many instances of place names that also serve in other contexts as names of installations, for example Three Mile Island. 
Does anyone know the local geography and culture well enough to comment on the article name? Andrewa 09:47, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The result of the VfD was to keep.  See above link for a record.  Postdlf 06:40, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Nation of Celestial Space

message: :(I'm pasting this into the talk page of all the micronation category articles.)
I've just started a template for the micronation infobox, based on the Sealand box. I've also written usage guidelines on it's talk page. I'd like to please invite any interested people to go over its talk page to discuss the template itself, along with my guidelines. As a demo of the template, please see Lovely (micronation), which I just edited to use the template. --Billpg 23:05, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Infobox Micronation]] 

message: Do we know who raised their flag over the UN building? --kingboyk 03:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The brief report that I read strongly implied that the UN flag-raising was a one-off promotional stunt. There is no evidence of the flag being present after the TV cameras stopped filming. I don't know if Mangan was a also published author - it seems possible, as the name isn't too common. --Gene_poole 00:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's the same guy. - grant (talk) 20:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag over the UN

message: The Nation of Celestial Space doesn't really qualify as a micronation. From the article micronation:
Micronations generally have a number of common features:
# They often assert that they wish to be widely recognized as sovereign states, but are not so recognized.
# They are small; those that claim to control physical territories are mostly of very limited extent. While several micronations claim hundreds or even thousands of members, the vast majority have no more than one or two active participants.
# Some issue government instruments such as passports, stamps, and currency, and confer titles and awards; these are rarely recognised outside of their own communities of interest.
The Nation of Celestial Space can hardly be described as "small" if its territory consists of the entire universe outside the Earth. 195.197.240.134 (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest you read the definition somewhat less selectively. It's an ephemeral statelike entity that never established bilateral relations with any other state of supranational entity despite aspiring to do so. Of course it's a micronation. --Gene_poole (talk) 01:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't really qualify as a micronation... 

message: "Hatch symbol" on its own doesn't convey much useful information... AnonMoos (talk)
:After a little googling, and looking closely at :File:CelestiaCoin.jpg, replaced it with "sharp symbol". AnonMoos (talk) 10:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag description
Talk:Shadow (file)

message: On modern linux there is a difference: the passwd file is world-readable and contains the usernames, groups, shells, homes, etc. But the hashes are stored in the shadow file, which is only readable by root.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1838 2007-07-26 07:50 /etc/passwd
-rw------- 1 root root 2072 2007-08-12 16:09 /etc/shadow
Should we s/encrypted/hashed ? MD5 or SHA1 aren't encryption.
--Stereo 10:21, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
The encryption used by UNIX systems isn't an encryption in the sense that there is an available decryption.  It's a one-way hash which just so happens to use a modified DES encryption to do the work.  This isn't relevant to shadowed passwords alone as all
UNIX-compatible systems use the same scheme.  So ... perhaps a discussion of UNIX-compatible
password encryptions belongs somewhere else?
Anyone interested in a history of Linux password shadowing?  Would that be a nice addition?
Tall Girl 18:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Slightly off-topic, but the /etc/passwd file is not always used. This can be replaced (via PAM, for example) by an LDAP or (My)SQL server. This then alleviates the task of authentication from /etc/passwd to a more fine-tunable database with per-user access. Of course the problem then is that every user still have a homedirectory which (usually) reflects their username. But this too can be prevented by auto-mounting user homedirs on login and auto-dismounting them after logout. NoobX 09:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a myriad of ways to remove the user ID information from the system, with the oldest in the UNIX domain being "NIS" (formerly "Yellow Pages") from Sun Microsystems.  There's also a method that's patent pending where the user ID used to sign in has no relationship to the user ID that the user is known by.  The objective of that invention is that user "tallgirl" does not authenticate to the system using "tallgirl", but rather as a name which they (me) are able to change, and which is not otherwise available.  As for violating least-privilege by allowing user information to be freely available, least privilege doesn't determine if something should or shouldn't be concealed, it only applies to the amount of privilege a process must have, at the absolute minimum, to perform its tasks. Tall Girl (talk) 03:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

message: Blowfish isn't a hash, it's a cipher. Please correct
77.38.47.181 (talk) 10:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — cdwn 15:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blowfish a cipher, not a hash 

message: Should the title of this page really be "Shadow password", instead of something like "shadow (file)" (in line with passwd (file))? As far as I can see, this article is not about shadow passwords, but is instead about the shadow password database. — cdwn 21:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. — cdwn 13:42, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Template talk:Political parties in Northern Ireland

message: This is a template to be added to the pages of Northern Ireland parties which aren't big enough to have the one for British political parties. I'm sure at least one of these parties is too small or defunct. WóCoill 10:26, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

message: There needs to be a clear definition of why some parties are excluded and why others are included, along the lines of 
#Parties with MP
#Assembly parties
#Parties with councillors
#Parties which fielded candidates since 20XX
#All Political parties in Northern Ireland (according to the electoral commision there are, ~80) 
I have tagged this as OR, as someone has choosen a novel way of defining "Political party in Northern Ireland" Fasach Nua 20:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Basis for inclusion
Talk:Least fixed point

message: Should there be a link to least weasel? I'm glad to know that even if there isn't a least fixed point of some function, there's always a least weasel. —Ashley Y 10:28, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
:And it's always carnivorous. Life is so much more predictable than math, isn't it? Deco 21:26, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

message: The article says:
:Immerman N. Immerman, Relational queries computable in polynomial time, Information and Control 68 (1–3) (1986) 86–104. and Vardi M. Y. Vardi, The complexity of relational query languages, in: Proc. 14th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, 1982, pp. 137–146. independently showed the descriptive complexity result that the polynomial-time computable properties of linearly ordered structures are deﬁnable in LFP. However, LFP is too weak to express all polynomial-time properties of unordered structures (for instance that a structure has even size).
The meaning of the acronym "LFP" is not explained.  Supposing that it stands for "least fixed point", then it cannot be understood in terms of what else is in the article, because the phrases "definable in least fixed point" and "least fixed point is too weak" does not make sense.  "LFP" here seems to refer to some sort of logical or axiomatic system, but the article never explains what this system might be.  Perhaps it refers here to first-order logic augmented with some sort of least fixed point operator?  —Mark Dominus (talk) 17:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, LFP stands for least fixpoint logic. Tijfo098 (talk) 20:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Definable in LFP" is undefined 

message: "Unfortunately computing the optimal fixed point is undecidable in general so it is primarily of theoretical interest."
Math is undecidable in general, so math is primarily of theoretical interest.
Proving the correctness of algorithms is undecidable in general, so proving the correctness of algorithms is primarily of theoretical interest. 
Computing is undecidable in general, so computing is primarily of theoretical interest.
Checking logical validity is undecidable in general, so checking logical validity is primarily of theoretical interest.
Classes of things that are 'undecidable' in the general case are a ubiquitous reality. Undecidability in the general case can not be shown to impact the practicality of anything. Even CSS is undecidabile. If you found out that the network protocols that you use everyday were undecidable it would probably be an occasion for a shrug. Your car stereo might be undecidable, and you wouldn't even notice it. In fact, the engine of your car might well be undecidable. Your microwave is probably undecidable. 'Undecidable' without qualification doesn't imply anything about practicality. So the referenced statement should be given some qualification, modified, or removed. Comiscuous (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colossal non-sequitur
Talk:Antony Sher

message: I'm quite sure it's Antony, not Anthony. A long time ago Mswake pointed this out to me. Should we move the whole biography to Antony Sher (which is currently a redirect)? <KF> 11:00, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
: Yes, you're absolutely right (I thought this used to be at Antony?) Mackensen (talk) 03:25, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name 
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages/Archive 1

message: Wikipedia:Disambiguation and abbreviations. It's only for TLAs, but we should make sure that policy and this one are coordinated. —Wahoofive (talk) 21:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found a related policy 

message: I think we're ready to formally make this a proposed extension of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. How would we go about it? I can't find any precedent -- it seems all the existing supplementary manuals started life as sections of WP:MOS and got spun off into separate pages. Presumably, we should set up a poll on this talk page, and announce it on Village Pump and the MOS talk page. Anything else? Is there a proper template to put on top? —Wahoofive (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's time we put it out too... but I know less than you do about MOS proposals... Neonumbers 09:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next step 

message: #—Wahoofive (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: :: Oppose, strongly (tho as to the overall format but not to any details that i have yet noticed), for reasons stated below as comments. --Jerzy~t 20:45, 18 & 13:53, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: So, what was the outcome?  The conversation here seems to have died, but it seems most people supported the guideline.  Why hasn't this been added into the WP:MOS? Josh Parris ✉ 02:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do it over the next few days. I was stalling because eleven votes is a pretty small turnout. —Wahoofive (talk) 03:22, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, what was the outcome?
Talk:Machamp

message: Aren't Machamp's extra limbs really based on Shiva?
Ultim87 02:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure about that. A lot of Hindu gods have extra arms, and I don't know why he'd be based on any of them. There's no relation to martial arts or anything.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 02:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shiva
Talk:List of markup languages

message: Isn't this article redundant? This can (and is) achieved with the inclusion of the listed items in a category.
I propose this article is deleted and include all the items in the markup languages category. --Maciel 11:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant?

message: HTML, XML, LaTeX, ...
62.202.180.87 (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many missing
Talk:Electronic communication network

message: This article is copied and pasted from the SEC's website. If it isn't paraphrased, shouldn't it be put in quotes? --Evan 11:26, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this still true?  If so, we need to put the source to avoid plagiarism. Superm401 - Talk 10:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Archipelago was bought by the NYSE in 2005, in the same transaction that led the NYSE to demutualize and become a public company.  Archipelago is now the NYSE's primary U.S. electronic exchange. This is a press release announcing the vote on the merger.  Epstein's Mother 23:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Someone put a merge tag on Electronic Negotiation back in 2008 and never created a discussion topic on it. The tag raises a couple of burning questions:
1) Are two articles describing the same thing?
2) Is this what people were blaming for that crazy stock market day a couple months ago?
3) Should these articles be merged?
and 4) Will I go bald when I get older?
Please provide comment to answer the first three of those questions after the beep.
--beep-- D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Electronic Negotiation into Electronic Communication network
Talk:Coventry Patmore

message: The laudatory second paragraph of the evaluation section ("His best work is found in the volume of odes called The Unknown Eros, which is full not only of passages but entire poems in which exalted thought is expressed in poetry of the richest and most dignified melody. Spirituality informs his inspiration; the poetry is glowing and alive. The magnificent piece in praise of winter, the solemn and beautiful cadences of "Departure," and the homely but elevated pathos of "The Toys," are in their manner unsurpassed in English poetry. His somewhat reactionary political opinions, which also find expression in his odes, are perhaps a little less inspired, although they can certainly be said to reflect, as do his essays, a serious and very active mind. Patmore is today one of the least known but best-regarded Victorian poets.") has no references to support the POV expressed in "richest," "glowing" and "unsurpassed."  Contrast this to the scorn his best-known work ("The Angel in the House") got and gets (see http://www.yorku.ca/dlatham/files/LathamSpr12.pdf).  04:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  evaluation 

message: There is almost nothing about his involvement in the Brotherhood and his prose work, which
Latham, p. 11 ( http://www.yorku.ca/dlatham/files/LathamSpr12.pdf ), says attracted Yeats and Heaney.Kdammers (talk) 04:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-poetry achievements 

message: You're asking us to extend the lede. I can't see anything important missing in the lede. It is the article itself that is perhaps longer than justified for a subject of limited notability. Valetude (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede OK 

message: This page seems to be strangely biased. The introduction calls him "one of the least-known but best-regarded Victorian poets.". The evaluation section also seems quite biased throughout. James G Thorn (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Diameter (protocol)

message: I introduced this table to make it easier to refer to the Diameter related RFCs.  I followed a table structure that is being used by several other protocol articles.
#       	Title                                                                                                              	Date published 	Related article	Obsoleted by	Notes
RFC 3588	Diameter Base Protocol.                                                                                            	September 2003.	Diameter       	            	
RFC 3589	Diameter Command Codes for Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 5.                                  	September 2003.	               	            	
RFC 4004	Diameter Mobile IPv4 Application.                                                                                  	August 2005.   	               	            	
RFC 4006	Diameter Credit-Control Application.                                                                               	August 2005.   	               	            	
RFC 4072	Diameter Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Application.                                                     	August 2005.   	               	            	
RFC 4740	Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application. M.                                                         	November 2006. 	               	            	
RFC 5224	Diameter Policy Processing Application.                                                                            	March 2008.    	               	            	
RFC 5431	Diameter ITU-T Rw Policy Enforcement Interface Application.                                                        	March 2009.    	               	            	
RFC 5447	Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for Network Access Server to Diameter Server Interaction.                            	February 2009. 	               	            	
RFC 5516	Diameter Command Code Registration for the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS).	April 2009.    	               	            	
 kgrr talk 15:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: RFCs

message: During the next few weeks, I will be working on this article in order to bring it up to shape.  A lay person should be able to understand how the protocol works by reading the article.  Many of the base concepts are missing currently such as the basic framework, compatibility with RADIUS, and how each of the applications work.  kgrr talk 15:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Dawnseeker2000 removed most of the external links to implementations. I have removed the last one to keep things consistent.
Over the years the article has been plagued by vendors adding external links to push their products. Now (2016) it is easy to find multiple implementations so there is no reason for the article to link to them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isj-wikipedia (talk • contribs) 19:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of links to implementations/products
Talk:Geofiction

message: Suggest merge with Constructed world. --JEREMY 12:25, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. -Branddobbe 22:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Support. Wouter Lievens 13:59, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Reject. Geofiction would take place on Earth instead a constructed world. Solar Apollo (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Constructed world" 

message: While I'm sure that numerous people believe the Bible to be a fantasy, or a pinch of fact mixed with a cement truck full of "colorful" details, there are a significant number of people who don't.  The phrasing "constructed worlds…are typically used to enhance the realisation of a fictional universe for a story or collection of stories" is fine until the example "such as Heaven and Hell in the Bible".  That's not NPOV, not by a long shot.  When there are plenty of neutral examples available, don't throw pot-shots at those who think the Bible is fact, not fiction. Kilyle 23:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heaven/Hell Reference

message: I am adding links to external pages on Fantasy Worlds and Geofiction, but I think more sites need to be added. It will be good if someone can add more sites on geofiction, I know outthere may be lots of them.Solar Apollo (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More external links, please!!!
Talk:Wallaroo, South Australia

message: I have removed 
 Notable visitors include:
 * Michael Christopher Court (Born littleton-on-seven, UK. 1931) in approximately 1947-8
As he seems not to be notable. If he gets an article or is demonstrated as notable, he can be put back. --ScottDavis 12:28, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled