lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aristarkh Lentulov

message: *From User talk:82.166.140.117:
You have edited the Aristarkh Lentulov‎ claiming that a portait is a forgery. In fact the prortrait came from http://www.gallery.permonline.ru/exhibitions/archive/1/ex1.htm - a reasonably respectful museum site? Why do you think it is a forgery? Alex Bakharev (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see a mention of this particular painting in the article he posted. How is it known that it's a forgery? Liz Read! Talk! 21:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately we cannot state it for sure. But the article claims that this Eduard Natanov was involved with a number of forgeries that makes webpage of the exhibition of "Tresuries from Eduard Natanov" collection very unreliable source. If we cannot be sure the painting is genuine we better remove it from the article. See Precautionary principleAlex Bakharev (talk) 21:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgery? 

message: Thanks, although the article does not mention the specific paintings the circumstances are suspicious enough to exclude the painting from the article. I have also removed it from List_of_Russian_artists#L and put a notice on the commons image :commons:File:Lentulov Lady in Blue.jpg. I have copied this conversation to Talk:Aristarkh Lentulov please continue the discussion there Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see a mention of this particular painting in the article he posted. How is it known that it's a forgery? Liz Read! Talk! 21:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately we cannot state it for sure. But the article claims that this Eduard Natanov was involved with a number of forgeries that makes webpage of the exhibition of "Tresuries from Eduard Natanov" collection very unreliable source. If we cannot be sure the painting is genuine we better remove it from the article. See Precautionary principleAlex Bakharev (talk) 21:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks!
Talk:Wolfgang Falck

message: Two questions: 1) would anyone be interested in working w/ me to improve the overall quality of this article? 2) I have Wolfgang Falck's autograph on plain cardstock. If I scanned it into digital format, could that be added to the article infobox? Thanks. Azx2 16:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 - signature 

message: Preserving here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsouced material
Talk:Exploratory data analysis

message: Isn't exploratory data analysis just an extension of descriptive statistics? In other words, shouldn't descriptive statistics and exploratory data analysis be merged? Or at least mention the relationship between the two in the both articles? 08:40, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exploratory data analysis and descriptive statistics 

message: There's an "external link" section that tries to link to an online course.  However, that link gets redirected to http://oli.cmu.edu.  I did not want to remove the link, because I figured it would be a nice resource if the link can be fixed. Does anyone know more about the course's new whereabouts? Hans Meine (talk) 12:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to CMU online course
Talk:Adolf Dickfeld

message: Hello I am from Germany.
Between 27.10.2015 and 07.11.2015 is a auction in munich (Germany).
One of the Object you can buy is the Knight´s Cross to the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves of Adolf Dickfeld. The minimum price is 17.000 € !!!
More information ==> www.hermann-historica.com 
Greetings
Rainer E.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rainer E. (talk • contribs) 16:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  You can buy his Knight´s Cross to the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves 

message: Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions and / or non RS militaria literature.
No de.wiki article exists. Did not hold a significant command and topped out as Oberst. Successful completion of missions (sorties flown, # of enemy aircraft shot down, etc) is not part of SOLDIER. A MilHist RfC on this topic has failed to gain consensus in May of 2017: 
*MilHist:RfC on the notability of flying aces.
Please also see a note at  MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists.
K.e.coffman (talk) 03:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Student loans in Australia

message: I believe that the discount for upfront payments has changed to 20%. I've no time now to find a source, although it shouldn't be too hard to find. DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) 15:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discount - 25% or 20%? 

message: I propose that this article be merged into Tertiary education fees in Australia, since that article obviously has more information than this one, and there really isn't any need for two articles. Initially, I was confused as to why this page was created in the first place, but after reading Quad entendre's talk page, I realized that it was actually created in the process of 'disambiguating' the general Student_loan page. Good on you, Quad entendre, for cleaning up that page - otherwise this merger of the duplicated information would not be possible.
DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) 16:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Arno Assmann

message: Probably because of his last name lol --99.55.166.120 (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  He committed suicide 
Talk:Innere Stadt (Graz)

message: * merge buildings list
* add more sources if possible
--Darkbane talk  15:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:Schenley Plaza

message: Is it really an entrance to the park? It was built over an old parking lot and stands on Pitt campus between Posvar Hall and the Carnegie Library. You have to go through CMU's campus to even get to Schenley park! 141.151.175.214 (talk) 05:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the Schenley Plaza area was originally designed to be a grand entrance to the park coming off of Bigelow Blvd. Although the original designs as they were intended were not realized because of its use as a parking lot for most of its life, its modern remake is considered the a modern realization of the those original designs and the grand entrance to Schenley Park. In any case, the Bellefield bridge to Flagstaff Hill has always been the main entrance to the park.  A major entrance has never been through CMU (or Carnegie Tech) whether coming from Squirrel Hill or Oakland. CrazyPaco (talk) 08:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entrance to the park? Really?
Talk:Arnold Henry Savage Landor

message: AHSL's father Charles Savage Landor married Esmerelda Armida Piselli (    -1915) on the 30th January 1866.  They had children Alfred Humbert Hugh Savage Landor born at Florence on the 12th June 1867; Elfreda Esmerelda Julia Landor born on the 11th November 1869 who married Professor Cavaliere Francesco Mangioni founder of the National Institute for deaf and dumb children in Florence; Arnold Henry Savage Landor born at Florence in 1872 and probably another child Walter Savage Landor.
This information almost certainly derives from Burke's Landed Gentry, as Esmerelda was the holder of the Llanthony estate in 1937. AHSL also has an entry in "Who was Who". These sources will need to be checked. Motmit (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To add to the confusion, I have a book here that mentions 1867 as the year of his birth. Anglerfisch (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth 1872 or 1865

message: The bibliography lists The Adventures of an Explorer. I think that this is bogus. I can find no record of such a book anywhere, while Everywhere etc. is easily accessible. Unless someone speaks up, I'm going to delete The Adventures of an Explorer. (2009-03-15)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.65.79.218 (talk) 01:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad book title?

message: Large parrts of the article have been copy-pasted, sometimes with very minor changes, from http://www.florin.ms/hsleng.html (which has been cited as an external link in the article from the outset). I've reworded the first section but don't have time to do the same for the rest of the article. Any takers? Sionk (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copypasting
Talk:Arnold Jackson (British Army officer)

message: Sorry. He is definitely not the most decorated. Any VC recipient would rate higher. Chavasse for example was awarded the double VC. I would think he was the most decorated. Freyberg also won the VC in WW1 plus three DSOs (2 of them in WW1) and was a Brigadier also in WW1. Wallie (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Most highly decorated British Officer of WW1

message: “[T]he youngest ever British Army Brigadier-General” and “becoming the youngest Brigadier-General in the British Army” stated without reference and implausible. Counter example: Roland Boys Bradford nearly two years younger, having been born after Jackson and promoted to Acting Brigadier before him.
Not my field: can someone knowledgeable suggest what the writer may have intended to say? Otherwise these two quotations have to go. Thanks.
(Combined with false claim in earlier versions, since corrected, that he “was the most highly decorated British World War I officer” calls impartiality of writing into question).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Not Proven (talk • contribs) 22:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Youngest British Army Brigadier-General 

message: In the article it says that Jackson «cut short his fishing holiday in Norway» to compete in the Olympic Games. We are writing a book about British anglers in Norway and are curious about the source of this information. In case he was in Norway we think we know where. Can anybody help to establish a reliable source? abre (talk) 19:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That was me. Using the Blame tool and querying "fishing", I added it way back in 2008. We were not so hot on referencing in those far off times.  Looking for a source that pre-dates that, I find this from 2004, , which is pretty close to what I added. Edwardx (talk) 20:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Fishing trip in Norway
Talk:Arnold Lunn

message: "The Guide to Montana" almost certainly does not refer to the US state of that name, but rather to a place in Switzerland.  Please do not link to your article on the state of Montana.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.69.127.101 (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guide to Montana 

message: Why does the article not refer to "the Harrovians"?  Am I missing something? 62.232.34.3 (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Harrovians 
Talk:List of families of spiders

message: I'm no expert on spiders, but I'm wandering if Solifugids ("Camel Spiders") should be on this list?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.224.133 (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Solifugids?

message: I saw a documentary on Animal Planet about spiders and it showed a very interesting breed of spider that could think and change its tactics based on the situation, it was also incredibly small for a spider with a brain the size of a salt crystal, I was wondering if anyone had an idea on which species it is or if it even has an article? Thanks, 205.209.70.61 23:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hunting Spider capable of Forward Thought

message: Redirected the article Types of Spiders to here. After editting some unencyclopedic content, the article was more of a list. Article spider has information. 99DBSIMLR 15:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2007

message: Is this a list of types of Spiders or just a list of Spiders? Or should the article be moved to list of species of spider? Taxonomy is not my strong point - Tiswas(t) 16:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an excellent merge candidate here Spider taxonomy Shyamal (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All spiders are predatory, even if cleptoparasites. I think the originator of this page was trying to provide a breakdown of spiders by hunting strategy. At best the article will provide a few examples of each category. A re-write to do away with the incomplete lists and a merge with Spider would probably be the best option.--Wloveral (talk) 03:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, there seems to be little to salvage here. I just went ahead and proposed it for deletion. Shyamal (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Type of Spiders or just Spiders?

message: actually, not a bad idea to make a complete list. wouldn't it be nice to have one representative picture for each family? maybe something like this: List of Testudines families? but be aware there is already a nice list (without pictures though) here: Spider_families#Table_of_Families. i made this some time ago, i guess i'll have to write a script someday to keep it updated... --Sarefo (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  a fresh start :) 

message: No-one did anything with this list; there was certainly no "fresh start". The article is completely unreferenced, which is not acceptable. It is seriously out-of-date with current views on spider classification, so any attempt to reference it would require major revisions. It completely duplicates the section at Spider taxonomy#Table of families, which does at least have a reference, albeit not a reliable one for current views. I conclude that the best thing to do for the present is to redirect it and update the target. Afterwards, this page could perhaps be reinstated differently. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "fresh start"
Talk:1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight/Archive 6

message: "transfer theory" is a disgusting euphemism. It should be called by its real name: ETHNIC CLEANSING
:Ilan Pappé agrees with you. His latest book is called The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. --Ian Pitchford 18:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ilan Pappe is a self hating jew and is discredited after the teddy katz case, he's irrelevant. Amoruso 20:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What does this have to do with anything? This guy is just showing everyone he does not know what a population transfer is. The homes of Jewish refugees, their money, frozen bank accounts, confiscated land, all could easily relieve the Palestinians. What you think there wasnt a Jewish refugee crisis? Of course, a much worse one. The thing different was, Israel relieved their people's refugee crisis, while the Arab nations sat on their behinds to expand a propaganda and human tool against Israel. That is what is "disgusting". --Shamir1 07:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "transfer theory" title is disgusting 

message: is the name "al Nakbar" used to refer to the "the refugee flight of Palestinian Arabs during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war" or to the war itself? I always understood it as being the name that the arab world prescribed to the war itself, not only because it was a catastrophe that Palestinians were displaced, but because it was a catastrophe that the State of Israel was created/not destroyed. should the opening line be changed? In the same light, should the title of the page be changed to Al Nakbar to encompass all of this? ILikeHowMuch 03:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  al Nakbar
Talk:Art Lund

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 23:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Arthur Alexander

message: It would be nice to have a list of the songs Alexander wrote, as it's not always clear in the text whether a recording was written by him or not.Jackaroodave (talk) 22:32, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll start something. Well . . . ..... you started something, I'll go next. Carptrash (talk) 23:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Songwriting?
Talk:Arthur Anthony Macdonell

message: 7th of what? Penalba2000 (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There appears to be some sort of confusion going on in the article between Macdonell the Sanskrit Scholar and his father. Our article on David George Ritchie says that "Ritchie married twice. His first marriage was in 1881 to Flora Lindsay, daughter of Col. A. A. Macdonell of Lochgarry, and sister of Professor A. A. Macdonell of Oxford". But this article starts with "7th of Lochgarry, was a noted Sanskrit scholar". Solomon7968 18:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with father 

message: The list of selected works has several problems. Firstly, it seems the author's name is spelled incorrectly on several of the texts. Secondly, almost every entry seems to use a different citation style format. The standard citation style on Wikipedia should probably be used. Lastly, it would probably be better if the list were in chronological order. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 16:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected Works problems
Talk:Arthur Auwers

message: There is a problem with the disambiguation page for "Auwers". There it refers to 
* Arthur Auwers (1895 - 1949) German astronomer
* Otto von Auwers (1838 - 1915) astronomer
The dates there given for Otto are those given here for Arthur. The disambiguation page needs clearing up by somebody who knows... Archie carnforth (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arthur Beresford Pite

message: Sources need to be published and thus available for verification. The contents of this article have to be based on publications, which need to be identified, not solely on the unpublished papers at RIBA and in private hands, so if the published sources could be added... HeartofaDog 11:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I have changed the article to state he was buried at West Norwood, this is consistent with the DNB & the cemetery Friends. It would thus appear he was not buried with his wife in Dover. Ephebi 13:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  burial 

message: This article is both enthusiastic and half-hearted. The enthusiastic section on 30 Euston Square is nice, but it vastly over-inflates the significance of that building to Pite's oeuvre. Reference to "The Pite Collection" -- particularly with no details of how to contact Ms. Trend-Hill or see the "collection" -- is bizarre and unnecessary. I suspect the piece was written by Ms. Trend-Hill herself, who worked at 30 Euston Square for a time, I believe.
Outside of these two sections, the material is half-hearted. It is: confusingly arranged non-chronologically; riddled with errors, and (as is pointed out on the page) devoid of references.
Given the importance of Pite, and the very full discussion of his work provided by Brian Hanson (ed.) The Golden City: essays on the architecture and imagination of Beresford Pite (1993), I think this article should be substantially rewritten: though I think some room must be kept for the present "insider" appreciation of the Euston Square building.
Jackhughes (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the concluding paragraph which attributes the article to Jeane Trend-Hill and directed people to her website and collection. Trend-Hill carried out research after a paranormal experience on Pite's grave. I can't see any evidence of a connection between Pite and 30 Euston Square either! Sionk (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

text: Regardless of the above unofficial permission to use the text from http://abpite.silent-cities.com/ , it seems wholly excessive to quote so much (even down to the names of the section headings). There should be some corrobration from reliable sources, at least. Sionk (talk) 00:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  a need to sort this article out! 

message: Would another article listing all the buildings by Pite be worthwhile ? 
Can find this and other buildings to start a list ! http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/en-369209-paget-memorial-mission-hall-and-ancillar DavidAnstiss (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Buildings by Pite
Template talk:Boeing combat aircraft

message: Do were really need a template for the B-50 - originally designated the B-29D only given a name change because congress would not spend any more money on obsolete WWII designs (ie the B-29) plus the new USAF wanted to distance themselves from the USAAF aircraft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davegnz (talk • contribs) 
:Dave, I appreciate you enthusiasm. But as this isn't the B-50 template, I'm not sure why your comments are relevant here. If I'm missing something here, I apologize, but I'm also not aware OF a B-50 template, just the :Template:B-29 family template. 
:Now, if you mean you don't understand why the B-50 is listed separately on THIS template here, the reason is that the template lists the articles on the various models, not just the models. We don't usually list models without articles in these templates.  Given that there is an article ON the B-50, it's entirely appropriate to list it here. If you want to merge the B-50 into the B-29, that's a different idea, and a bad one too. Yes, the B-50 itself stated as the B-29D, but the later models underwent many improvements. In addition, Most aviation publications cover the B-29 and B-50 separately, and so readers would expect Wiki to do the same. - BillCJ 16:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: B-50 Template
Talk:Arthur Brisbane

message: Did he originate this saying?Midgley (talk) 10:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A picture is worth a thousand words? 

message: Brisbane bought the Milwaukee Evening Wisconsin and the Washington Timeshttps://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1144&dat=19181012&id=k7caAAAAIBAJ&sjid=dUkEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3661,3669196&hl=en, either with his own funds or as a front man for Hearst. Official ownership eventually passed to Hearst.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.215.123.163 (talk) 18:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  His newspaper ownership. 

message: No mention of the national uproar that was caused after Assassination of President McKinley? Brisbane wrote an article calling for someone to shoot McKinley and was accused of yellow journalism and stirring up the fatal act. The scandal ended William Hearst's (owner of the newspaper) presidential hopes and was a huge national scandal. WikiMane11 (ThunderPeel) (talk) 21:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  National scandal?
Talk:Arthur C. Cope

message: The biography in the National Academy of Sciences, Biographical Memoirs V.60 (1991), Chapter: 2. Arthur Clay Cope, pp. 17-30, Arthur Clay Cope Biography says: "It is chemistry's tragic loss that he died suddenly at the age of fifty-six in Washington, D.C., where he had gone for American Chemical Society and National Academy of Sciences business." 
I have not found a more specific biography or obituary, but the story goes that he died from asphyxiation, choking on some food while at dinner. Perhaps something about his death can be added to the main article (but maybe not the choking story). AdderUser (talk) 01:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death