lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Judith Quiney

message: I hope you don't mind that I added some images. Feel free to change them - I just thought they might brighten up the page a bit. Awadewit | talk 00:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine. I added one myself. Wrad 01:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly no objections; I'd been considering what images might fit here myself, so that's much appreciated. However, since New Place was demolished (only the well and some foundation stones remain) in 1759 by the then owner, vicar Francis Gastrell of Frodsham, I suspect that particular image is somewhat misnamed. Could it, perhaps, be a picture of Nash's House—Thomas Nash, Elizabeth's husband's, house;  which lay next door to New Place—taken from the gardens now occupying the ground where New Place once stood?--Xover 08:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry - I was only following the label on the commons. Sometimes those labels are incorrect (shocking!). By all means take it down or call it "Elizabethan house in Stratford" or something like that. Awadewit | talk 09:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh heh. No worries. I'll dig up something suitably picturesque and marginally related to replace it. :-) --Xover 09:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Coxen Hole

message: I feel that this article has no significance what so ever, I feel that the author has not given the reader enough information about this topic. The reader must be engaged in the article, for it to be a sucess. - Dr. Mandellez
:WP:POINT.  Corvus cornix 22:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Primary health organisation

message: I wonder if the inroduction could be worded here to be more inclusive of the purpose of the PHOs as well as how they are (primarily) funded.
PHOs aim to meet the 'local' health needs of their enrolled populations. They are funded on a capitation basis, but also through contracting with a number of other agencies, such as the Ministry of Health (directly), District Health Boards, ACC and potentially others. Some PHOs deliver health services directly also.
Thoughts ....
JJaydenm 01:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If giving examples, they should be very selective - e.g. the biggest. Otherwise, you'll need to include every PHO from Tongan Health Society through to ProCare.
-- Greaser (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giving examples
Talk:Primes in arithmetic progression

message: I just created  the article Primes in arithmetic progression which mentions myself (Jens Kruse Andersen). The article topic is notable and not about me. The article contains inline citations to my website and includes some computational records by myself. I believe this is done in a neutral way that does not violate Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. My website is only used as reference for completely uncontroversial computer verified computational records. The site is respected in the field for collecting records, and referenced by other article references at the Prime Pages ("Jens Kruse Andersen's excellent Primes in Arithmetic Progression Records" ) and MathWorld ("A more complete table is maintained by Andersen" ). The Prime Pages only lists records with at least 1000 digits, MathWorld is incomplete and not up to date with records, and printed sources like books by Paulo Ribenboim have many obsolete records, so I think my complete, updated and GFDL licensed record tables are acceptable sources. It would be odd to omit records for those AP lengths where I currently have the record. PrimeHunter 01:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential [[WP:COI]] concerns 

message: The number (145978014 + 253131151·n)·157# + 1 is not prime for n = 1, 2, 3. When n = 1, it is divisible by 42571, when n = 2, it is divisible by 4361741359, and when n = 3, it is divisible by 1669.
n	factorization of (145978014 + 253131151·n)·157# + 1
1	42571 · 177031237 · 145471037094899237 · 12878044118880392032571485123904015935949
2	4361741359 · 1791334179877975541386469 · 2953041949801531612683416686164269051
3	1669 · 68447 · 278591 · 17164801 · 58628487782661421475772762675874142815712590666207
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.14.37.226 (talk) 
:Well spotted! The source is my website  but I had a typo there. 253131151 should be 25313115 without '1' at the end. My site links the year 2009 to the announcement which has the right number. I have corrected my site and the article. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error for ''k'' = 14 

message: The k column in the table of largest AP-k is indexed from 1. Shouldn't it be indexed from 3 like the next table? But if it were, it would end with k=24, while the text refers to AP-26 examples. Mdmi (talk) 01:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology puzzle 

message: There are 2 updates available. 05/18  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pzktupel (talk • contribs) 11:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:List of University of Illinois Chicago people

message: The link to Dick Simpson is to the wrong Dick Simpson, and in fact there does not seem to be a page on the Chicago politician —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.65.11 (talk) 02:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed link from list. --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: Orbert Davis should be listed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.89.21.109 (talk) 07:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Faculty 
Talk:Currumbin, Queensland

message: estuary & dredging history, a possible photo of the early estuary
File:StateLibQld 1 151675 View over Currumbin estuary, Gold Coast, ca. 1911.jpg
description 1 View over Currumbin estuary, Gold Coast, ca. ... Currumbin, Queensland Category:1911 in Australia Category:Black and white photographs ...
(1,000 × 718 (77 KB)) - 09:11, 30 May 2013
Then Currumbin rock & Upper Currumbin Creek
File:Queensland State Archives 1930 View of Currumbin looking north showing Currumbin Rock c 1934.png
description 1 View of Currumbin, looking north, showing Currumbin Rock ... 1930-1939 name Place | value 1 Gold Coast City name Material Type | ...
(720 × 455 (258 KB)) - 11:58, 18 June 2013
File:Queensland State Archives 1933 Scene on Upper Currumbin Creek c 1934.png
1930-1939 name Place | value 1 Gold Coast City name Material Type | ... Australia in the 1930s Category:Upper Currumbin Creek Category:Forests ...
(720 × 549 (325 KB)) - 12:12, 18 June 2013
Oddly, Bananas - only  mention I'd read was in an account of land owner of labrador who had banana 'plantation' in coolangata - but I couldn't substantiate.
File:Queensland State Archives 2054 Sugar bananas on the banks of Currumbin Creek c 1934.png
1930-1939 name Place | value 1 Gold Coast City name Keywords | value 1 ... Australia in the 1930s Category:Banana plantations in Australia ...
(720 × 509 (300 KB)) - 02:17, 30 May 2013
HOTELS
File:StateLibQld 1 153311 Hotel Nicoll in Currumbin, ca. 1915.jpg
Category:Inlets Category:Hotels and pubs on the Gold Coast Category:Currumbin, Queensland Category:1915 in Australia Category:Black and ...
(1,000 × 586 (62 KB)) - 09:31, 30 May 2013
File:StateLibQld 1 213080 Hotel Currumbin, Gold Coast, ca. 1930.jpg
description 1 Hotel Currumbin, Gold Coast, ca. ... Category:1930 in Australia Category:Black and white photographs Category:Currumbin, Queensland ...
--Andys'edtits 15:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: wikicomon pics for area for easy access in case required
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Final Fantasy VIII

message: The working definition for this topic is pretty simple, "all aspects specific to Final Fantasy VIII", including the spin-off game Chocobo World.--Pharos 01:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic does not meet current Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria, and will be eligible for removal after 1 January 2008 if this situation is not rectified.  In particular, criteria call for at least three featured articles in a topic, while this topic has only two such articles.--Pharos 01:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the criteria say at least three articles, not three featured articles. — Deckiller 02:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... currently the wording on Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria is that "several" articles be FA; and "several" usually means more than two.  Perhaps I should raise the issue there.--Pharos 03:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, I would probably object to a three FA minimum, especially with respect to smaller Featured Topics. — Deckiller 03:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm striking this out, you're right enough – there is no such explicit statement there.  Perhaps indeed there was some confusion between the two criteria in my mind.  Anyway, I hope we can work out something more useful than "several" at the criteria page.--Pharos 05:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Would it be possible to just remove Chocobo World from the topic, since it's not a major part of Final Fantasy VIII and only slightly related? — Deckiller 21:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't just arbitrarily remove articles from the topic, I don't think there is really a process for it. And besides, it could get ridiculous if we have to keep removing and re-adding articles, it would just be a waste of time. I vote we rally and fix it. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure it's even possible to fix it at this point, which is why I propose removing it from the topic. Doesn't the article needs references that don't exist? — Deckiller 05:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If that is the case, I think we should merge it, and then update the topic. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

text: What refs are needed exactly? The article seems like it has improved since 3 months ago. FightingStreet (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: Of course, GA articles should be tried to be improved to FA status.  It is vitally important that at least one such additional article is promoted (see above).--Pharos 01:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: I am not aware of any possible additions to this topic.--Pharos 01:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Hurricane Isabel

message: The working definition seems to be, "Hurricane Isabel and its effects by region".--Pharos 01:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic meets current criteria perfectly well.--Pharos 01:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: Of course it would be nice, as always, if some of the GAs were promoted to FAs.--Pharos 01:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: I am not aware of any possible additions to this topic.--Pharos 01:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Love. Angel. Music. Baby.

message: The working definition seems to be, "Love. Angel. Music. Baby. and its songs that were released as singles"--Pharos 01:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: The topic meets current criteria perfectly well.--Pharos 01:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: I am not aware of any possible additions to this topic.  Presumably the tracks that weren't released as singles are considered non-notable.--Pharos 01:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two articles.  Harajuku Lovers Tour 2005, the tour she did to promote the album.  Harajuku Lovers Live, a live DVD from the Harajuku Lovers Tour.  I don't think there are any featured articles on concert tours or music DVDs at the moment, so I don't really have any guide to go on for those articles.  ShadowHalo 02:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: There's actual information about the DVD and its background though.  In the case of Harajuku Lovers Live, it's, from what I can tell, just another thing for Interscope to market, and there's not much actual discussion of it in the media since it was released at the same time as her second solo album.  I've proposed merging it into Harajuku Lovers Tour 2005 since they both have a very similar scope.  ShadowHalo 23:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true - how good an article can be always depends on the material available. Merging it is an idea. LuciferMorgan 10:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Talk:State housing in New Zealand

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to State housing in New Zealand. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 13:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: State housing →  – "State housing" is a generic phrase, not one specific to New Zealand, and should therefore redirect to the corresponding broad-concept article at public housing.  recently tried to do this move, but it was reverted by  because . This is true in the sense that "public housing" is the more common name in the United States (or "social housing", "government housing", etc. in other countries), but not in the sense that "state housing" is a uniquely New Zealand phrase; a quick web search shows that it's also used by official bodies in Norway and several US states, for instance. They're just plain English descriptions of the same concept. – Joe (talk) 12:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

text: * Support, deepest apologies for not posting on the talk page for consensus before changing the name. But support for the same reasons as stated by the others above and as per my edit summary. Sour789 (talk) 15:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Support suggestion from User:Necrothesp.  Generic terms, with synonyms. Council housing, social housing, affordable housing.  I guess there’s a bit of ENGVAR at play, but the varying terms are meaningful in many different countries. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 January 2024
Talk:Quesnel Lake

message: How can this be stated with certainty?  I added "claimed to be", since the depths of Chilko, Seton, Anderson, Owikeno, Atlin Lake/Taku Arm, Harrison Lake etc are unknown.....similarly the boast re Great Bear Lake is really only relevant if qualified with the word "measured"....Skookum1 (talk) 16:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deepest fjord lake??
Talk:The Ignition Factor

message: I recently replayed the whole game and garnered a large amount of information. My plan as of now is to simply get it written down and into the article. After that, I'll work on organizing it. Not that I'm just going to throw random bits of info together and post it, but the headings and sub-headings will require work. It will be semi-organized but like everything else, improvement is necessary.Durchschnitt (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Getting Started

message: I have a number of details that I need to add to that the missions section. So like everything else, slowly but surely.Durchschnitt (talk) 02:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article's looking great! See if you can find some nice images to put in it. Evaunit♥666♥ 01:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missions
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Michigan State University

message: Note that article Michigan State University Libraries was part of this topic from 13:49, 23 June 2007 until 18:09, 12 January 2008, after it was added by Teh tennisman without it being formally nominated for addition, and without anyone noticing this and removing it again - rst20xx (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

message: The working definition seems to be "major institutional aspects of Michigan State University.--Pharos 02:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic does not meet current Wikipedia:Featured topic criteria, and will be eligible for removal after 1 January 2008 if this situation is not rectified.  In particular, all articles must be either GA or FA (Michigan State Spartans is neither) and criteria call for at least three featured articles in a topic, while this topic has only two such articles.  To maintain featured topic status, 'Michigan State Spartans' must be promoted to a higher status, and a third FA article must be found (it could be the Spartan article, or any of the other articles).--Pharos 02:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears I was being a bit overzealous with that second requirement.  Never mind that part, which I've stricken out.--Pharos 05:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: There are enough vital improvements needed (see above), that we can hold off on these for now.--Pharos 02:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Retired Pacific hurricanes

message: The working definition is quite well defined as, "all Pacific hurricanes that have had their names retired".--Pharos 02:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic meets current criteria perfectly.--Pharos 02:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: Of course, it would be good to improve some of the GAs to FAs.--Pharos 02:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: I do not believe that any additions to this topic would be possible, excepting the possibility of future Pacific hurricanes with names that are retired.--Pharos 02:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hurricane Ioke and Typhoon Paka have both had their names retired in the recent Central Pacific name list reorganization. Neither article is currently anywhere close to featured status, but there should probably be a grace period of sorts for them to be brought up to snuff. —Cuiviénen 23:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any future retired hurricane names will have to be added to the topic within a three-month grace period of the date of the name being retired - rst20xx (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alma will need to be added to this within 3 months of today Jason Rees (talk) 01:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Manuel has 3 months to get up to snuff.Jason Rees (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions

message: the name is wrong! it should be "Retired Pacific hurricane names"
:I agree - rst20xx (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: name
Talk:TAI TV

message: DON'T YOU DARE THINK OF MERGING THIS. TAI TV IS THE BEST THING ON EARTH.
I actually this that if the page got to have more information and less opinions, it should be able to stay.   Last time I checked, it was one of the top downloaded music Podcasts on iTunes.   76.106.9.196 23:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hisashi Iwakuma

message: With all due respect, I honestly don't see how updating the table of career statistics throughout the season is a problem. No, it's not necessary by any means, and yes, player statistics do become quickly outdated (though starting pitchers in Japan only pitch once a week, so I don't see how this is much of a problem). Then again, my claim that having that (2009) row there makes it easier to update the statistics later on (particularly for a novice editor who isn't completely familiar with the markup regarding table formatting) is valid; and seeing as I've taken taken this much time to write up everything else in the article, I think it's fair that I receive the benefit of the doubt as to whether I myself would be capable to update the table throughout the season (if not after every start, then at least every few weeks). Tech77jp (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please also note that just deleting the entire row without reverting the bottom line of the table (career stats) and marking it as "current as of the end of the 2008 season" creates discrepancies and is confusing to readers. Tech77jp (talk) 03:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating career statistics
Talk:H. Grady Spruce High School

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "dmn-hgs" :
** HGS alums on DMN.
** 
DumZiBoT (talk) 00:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Saffron

message: The working definition appears to be, "history and use of saffron".--Pharos 02:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic meets current criteria well, and is even a "perfect" featured topic since all of its articles are FAs.--Pharos 02:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements

message: There is no obvious room for improvement in the current articles.--Pharos 02:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential improvements

message: There are no other articles on the subject of saffron in Wikipedia (and we probably cover the subject in more depth than any other general encyclopedia), but still there probably is room for one or two more articles on specific saffron-related subjects here.--Pharos 02:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Talk:801 Grand

message: Currently, the article states that "The 801 Grand Building follows a postmodern design", which links to Postmodernism.  Should this instead link to Postmodern architecture?
I'd consider making the change myself, but I'm not sure I'm bold enough to edit an article I saw in the "Did you know..." section of the main page.
75.188.230.160 (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the article.  75.188.230.160 (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Postmodernism" or "Postmodern architecture"?
Talk:Frank Scarrabelotti

message: This article is an obituary written by family members, uses first person, and glorifies a person without reason. This violates WP:MEMORIAL and WP:NPOV and it should either be completely rewritten or deleted. Canjth 02:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I have classified this as a stub. It also needs an infobox and a photo. Capitalistroadster 05:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:Handy Man (song)

message: Infoboxes for the Jimmy Jones and James Taylor versions of "Handy Man" have been requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/List_of_notable_songs/6.
:Done. Bonnie (talk) 03:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that this song is R&B.
In this song, vocal style and melody is mostly rock'n'roll and less R&B.
So i added the genre "R&B." LSM1204 (talk) 01:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  R&B