lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Minister's Black Veil

message: The Minister's Black Veil is often cited as "ambiguous" literature. The author intentionally made it open to interpretation. As such, the section claiming that the veil represents secret sin should be removed, as well as the statement that Mr. Hooper committed adultery. Nowhere does it say that he committed adultery. It is pure speculation, and it is falsely stated as a fact. The Edgar Allen Poe quote proves nothing, since he is not the author, as has been stated.
I think the entire "Symbols" section should be removed, or rewritten to make it clear that it is one of many opinion.
:This whole article could use lots of help. The specific section you refer to even has a clean-up template on it, so you are not the first to notice it. Even though there are many interpretations, these articles need to make some attempt at summarizing generally accepted ones. The idea that Poe's quote proves nothing is quite true, but it is quite clearly attributed to him as speculative and does not at all imply that his was the only interpretation. His reviews of Hawthorne are important, he was one of the most important literary critics of his day, so his interpretation is worth including. His name is also worth spelling correctly in the future. :) But, again, the section is worthless by Wikipedia stanzas because, as the template over that section shows, nothing there is attributed properly. --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purposeful Ambiguity 

message: Added a wikilink to the article "Puritan".
TheInformativePanda (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit on February 13 2014
Talk:Data conversion

message: I'd like to add a link to TextConverter by SiMX as a tool relevant to the issue: http://textconverter.simx.com
Does anybody have any objections?
:Consider adding it under a section named "Commercial Solutions," since WP is encyclopedic, and people have perceieved an external link as just an advertisement.  ManVhv 18:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Can OpenOffice.org interpret .DOC files with complete accuracy? I do not think so. --Antonielly (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: The current version of this article mentions "pivotal encodings", but this is most likely a neologism that was invented for this particular article. I haven't seen any use of this phrase outside of Wikipedia, except for a few pages that refer to this Wikipedia article. Jarble (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there such a thing as a "pivotal encoding?"{{anchor|Is "pivotal encoding" a neologism?|disputed}}
Talk:Last universal common ancestor

message: i removed the 2016 weiss et al study from the lead. it does not belong there, it's a preliminary study at best and a more recent study suggested that > 80% of the genes it identified in LUCA were false positives of its methodology. see:
"A New Analysis of Archaea–Bacteria Domain Separation: Variable Phylogenetic Distance and the Tempo of Early Evolution"
Haddarr (talk) 05:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Weiss et al is certainly a seminal paper in the field. The paper you mention is discussed and cited in the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing 2016 weiss et al study 

message: I have to say I'm slightly confused by the opening sentence, as to what this LUCA thing actually is. An individual, or a group of individuals? It's described as a "population" but then other parts of the article imply it was just a single bacterium or similar.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's spoken of in both ways. There was certainly a population of similar cells. However all living things come by definition from just one of these. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Question from @Amakuru is concerning the “confusion”, I mentioned in my update from  20 September 2023. For example numerous authors use the term LUCA while it should be UCA. Maya Kandler (talk) 12:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  As you say, that has already been addressed; if more is really needed, then feel free to add and cite it (in the article body, not the lead, see below). But since this article is called "LUCA", and since as you rightly say many authors use the term, it is a "term of use" and we as an encyclopedia can properly have an article on it. It is fine to mention that "UCA" is an alternative, but it is not our job to say that a term in wide usage is "wrong", whatever that would mean. The other point is that we can't start talking about "UCA" in the lead: the lead is only a summary of the rest of the article, so there must be a discussion in the article body, presumably discussing the subtleties of UCA vs LUCA in terms everyone can understand, for the lead to summarize. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

text: You could say a species, the only one at the time. But let's not forget, LUCA is a hypothesis. Archaea and bacteria are quite distinct. The evidence that they're derived from a common ancestor is, as things stand, not wholly conclusive. There's no spectrum of 'missing links' among known procaryotes. LUCA is more of an assumption: we kind of extrapolate to assume that archaea and bacteria are related because branching is how new species came to be, later on in the history of life. We may be wrong. If early planet Earth offered the conditions for life to develop once, why not twice? Magic77wand (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this an individual organism? Or a population?  

message: — Assignment last updated by Kcshaffman (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ASTBIO 502 Astrobiology Special Topics -Origin Of Life
Talk:Hayabusa (wrestler)

message: I removed the "He returned to FMW in 2003 and was cabable of moving his arms and legs, he was also able to compete in the ring at this time" part, as this obviously could not be true because FMW went bankrupt in 2002 (http://fmwwrestling.us/Hayabusa2.html does make a mention of a FMW reunion show, but that was a one-time event), and he wasn't (and still isn't) capable of competing in the ring either.
:I can't remember where, but about a year ago I read that Mr. Gannosuke had started up his own fed called WMF. I suspect the FMW mention was a typo of WMF. Hayabusa had made an appearance there at about that time, in his wheelchair. He did have some motion in his legs, and let one of the heels slap him around to get them over. Unfortunately I can't cite a source. 71.174.78.177 07:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FMW

message: It says in the article that there is a photo of Hayabusa and Triple H? I have the Vince, Shane, and Hayabusa photo, but where can the Triple H one be found? Anybody have a link? - Timber99 - Timber99 21:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo with Triple H
Talk:Manuel Chaves

message: I imagine the Manuel Chaves who massacred Navajos is the same one who was instrumental in winning the Battle of Glorieta Pass for the Union (disturbing though it is to my good-guy-bad-guy approach to history).  Anyone know for sure?  —JerryFriedman 00:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He is.  I'm now the proud borrower of Little Lion of the Southwest, by Marc Simmons, and will write a short bio of Chaves unless somebody else does it first.  —JerryFriedman 16:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John L. Estrada

message: The article Frankie Segarra mentions Estrada as an Hispanic. Where exactly was he born (and when)? Scriberius 00:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal data
Talk:Beau Boulter

message: This wording is a bit peculiar. If I am not mistaken about the intended meaning of this sentence, would it not perhaps be wiser to re-word it as "Although the 13th District had become increasingly Republican in federal elections". It might just be me, but current wording if "at the national level" feels a bit clumsy. SecretName101 (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Although the 13th District had become increasingly Republican at the national level"
Talk:Antilag system

message: I'm, sorry, but this page does not really explain what a anti lag system actually is?
Its rather confusing...anyone feel like fixing it up, I have no knowledge on the topic myself.121.44.45.105 08:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Anti-lag is purely a software thing, the hardware required is only a big idle control valve, so in effect the STi and the EVO are NOT equippped with anti lag.
And misfiring system is a very inaccurate name, this isn't a misfire, this is just moving part of the combustion into the exhaust manifold. --Baldur 20:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled 2

message: I believe there to be an error in the 3rd from the last sentence. It mentions compressor surge as being a previously limiting factor in a turbo's abilities. If i am not mistaken, ALS will not make up for surge problems, which usually do not exist at low RPM anyway. Other than that, this article was very informative.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.129.3 (talk) 23:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Surge is primarily a problem at lower engine speeds. It's a phenomenon with centrifugal compressors when when the flow is not high enough to sustain the pressure it's operating at. Many modern turbocharger designs have an air bleed between the inducer and the compressor on the compressor side to increase stability at low air flows. --Baldur (talk) 15:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  error 

message: I'm curious, but shouldn't this article be moved to Antilag system, without capitalization and the hyphen? —Mr. Grim Reaper at 16:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to the new title. Any discussion can go on here. —Mr. Grim Reaper at 02:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: is it noisy or is it quiet? there seems to be some conflict here  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.84.89 (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'usage' section 

message: This car uses a unique antilag system described, for example, here: https://jalopnik.com/the-new-koenigsegg-jesko-gets-a-kind-of-anti-lag-along-1833061455
208.38.228.55 (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koenigsegg Jesko
Talk:Financier

message: One of the most important element of Jews today. Completely missing.
Come on guys! Chonanh (talk) 21:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khazars 

message: I think the present article is quite wrong.
Financier denotes that somebody gives money.
It does not denote or connote whom or what he will get for this.
To write he will do that for a living is totally baseless. 
The one who is clearly interested in the return on investment is the Investor.
Financier is not a profession, rather a passion.
Maybe he invests in an unknown painter and is happy if the painter survives or even gets known.
This is near to Sponsor.
So the financier stands undecided and undefined in between Sponsor and Investor.
This article over-defines Financier.
But do not ask me to correct this myself, because en is not my first language. --Manorainjan (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what goes out and what comes in
Talk:The Secret (2006 film)

message: ...by the usual left-wing mob.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.162.240.241 (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a typical hit-job... 

message: The intro refers to a "censored version" of the film, yet the article contains no explanation of what was censored. I put a citation-needed tag, but a bit of detail explaining what was cut and why a censored version got attention would probably suffice. (I have no stake on any controversy related to this production - I'm just pointing out a "plot hole" in the article that renders the use of the word "censored" without explanation a possible WP:NPOV issue. 136.159.160.8 (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Censored version

message: If the Law of Attraction is supposed to attract good writing to this article, it's not working. Hopeless mess. EEng 01:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree your comment is hilarious. I tried to add some tidbits there and there. I do not think it was written by fans though.Filmman3000 (talk) 15:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a heap of gibberish
Talk:List of stock used by Swiss Federal Railways

message: Yes road-numbers of this class are into the range between 16311 and 16460. But numbers 16327-16330, 16377-16380 and 16415-16420 was never used. 150 numbers without 14 not-used numbers is equal to 136 engines (and reality). Greetz Arnim 85.181.169.205 (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quantity of class Ee 3/3

message: The class 842 under MaK G 1204 BB has been categorised as a "swiss federal railways locomotive" - it was only operated by Sersa as far as I know not SBB, the class is also in this list. I've removed it from that category.
Any messages please leave on MaK G 1204 BB talk page.Sf5xeplus (talk) 00:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Am 842

message: Surely the ETR 470 and 610s should be added.  there are 3 470s left with CFF and 7 610s (Trenitalia has 1 and 7 respectively)Oldboltonian (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ETRs 

message: This article is definitely incomplete. The New Pendolino is missing from this article, and the Stadler EC250 and :de:Bombardier TWINDEXX Swiss Express EMUs, which have been ordered and are in the process of delivery have not been added. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete article
Talk:Axxis

message: I'm glad to see that there are people that care to make the biography I added from their official site better :-) Let's make this article even better! Thanks to the guy who put the nice photos! Iaberis 00:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography
Category talk:Neurological disorders

message: I am trying to sort out this very large category, with many subcategories that contain supercategories and other problems. I propose to create two parallel sorting schemes for neurologic diseases that can act as metacategories: "Neurological disorders by disease category," and "Neurological disorders by part of nervous system." A separate category for "Neurological symptoms and signs" can contain symptoms such as agnosia and ataxia. Please let me know what you think.  --Gccwang (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category sorting
Talk:Laka

message: The old article read as follows, but I can't find anything like this in Craig's Dictionary of Polynesian Mythology and so I've replaced it with the entry from there.  Bucketsofg 00:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ::It may be that there were one or more Laka in Hawaiian mythology - including a female Laka in the Pele cycle of myths. More research may be needed here Kahuroa 11:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick look at Beckwith confirms that there are in fact 4 different Laka in Hawaiian mythology, only one of which equates to the Rata of other Polynesian cultures... so I will be rewriting this article in the next while...Kahuroa 10:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Research needed

message: I have made separate articles for these areas as they had sufficient material to warrant it and because the cognate names of the hero in these languages are a bit distant from 'Laka' - and there is a wealth of material about Rātā in Maori tradition that could be added. See Rātā (Māori mythology),  Rata (Tahitian mythology),  and Rata (Tuamotu mythology). Kahuroa 11:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rātā/Rata- Māori, Tahitian, and Tuamotu 

message: On writing the article about the god Laka for Belarusian wikipedia (be) I decided to compare with English and other versions and saw that articles Laka in Czech, German, Russian, Esperanto, Polish are absolutely about different things (lakes, sea, lacquered plates). Thus only English, Sweden + new Belarusian articles are about Polynesian Laka. -  87.252.227.121 (talk) 14:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with foreign wikis
Talk:Caddington F.C.

message: This page has been tagged as not notable as it has not been shown that this football team has competed in the FA Cup which is one of the criteria of Football team notability in England.Delusion23 (talk) 23:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Slam (DJs)

message: This article was listed on deletion review because it was thought that the  tag at the top of this page implied it was being renominated for deletion. Instead, the template means that because of "no consensus", the article has been kept. I have archived the discussion. Johnleemk | Talk 06:54, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good. I hope it's more up to standards now. Thanks Nbettencourt 12:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DRV|DRV]]
Talk:Baron Wolman

message: I was about to do a speedy delete - bio, but I saw the paragraph after the (potentially copyright violating) photo.  You may want to put the reason this shouldn't be quickly deleted in the first paragraph.  Bobak 00:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better organization 

message: I made this entry but then it disappeared so I made it again. We just need one entry for Baron Wolman so please just merge any duplications and then we can edit the page. Baron was the first Chief Photographer for Rolling Stone Magazine, for its first 3 years. Thank you. User: scribblerman
Scribblerman 16:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Scribblerman, the previous versions were deleted because they were copyright violations. Just zis Guy you know? 17:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment fomr article 

message: Its history shows that this article was largely written by User:Scribblerman (contributions).
Here is a photograph about which Scribblerman both says (c) Baron Wolman and describes himself as the copyright holder of this work. Autobiography or misstatement? -- Hoary (talk) 00:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Autobiography?
Talk:Garry Guzzo

message: Garry Guzzo is a personal friend of Bob Chiarelli [unsigned]
And this is important because ... ? CJCurrie 01:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gate of Hell (film)

message: The new Blue Ray release box notes say that the film was unavailable because of degeneration of the Eastmancolor negative. It adds that the current restoration was created from the three-strip separations originally made for release printing (Separation film is black and white, and so does not degenerate like color). Two notes for better researchers than I to find sources for:
o  If separations existed, why not use them earlier? Were they "misplaced" in a vault somewhere?
o  All Eastmancolor negative stocks of the era (type 5254) degenerated in time, and the positive release prints made from them decayed even faster. However, the Japanese production company, experimenting with the then brand-new process, created a very "thin" (somewhat overexposed) negative, making the image even more delicate.Jim Stinson (talk) 23:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film degeneration 
Talk:Nakasendō

message: I originally listed the stretches of highway in relation to the modern day cities/towns through which they pass, but now I'm thinking it would better to list the accompanying post towns instead. Douggers 06:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highways

message: I don't think we need three variations for the translation of "Nakasendō." I'm going to cut it down to one translation, because the others seem superfluous. Douggers 10:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of Nakasendō

message: This is the road also known as the Kisokaidō, yes? I'm surprised to not see that noted in the article, as the other name is much used (e.g. in woodblock prints from the Late Edo period). Noel (talk) 14:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kisokaidō
Talk:Tōkaidō

message: This is as much a note for myself as for other editors. The list of stations needs to be properly wikilinked to the actual locations. Most currently link to disambig pages, redirects, or the wrong page entirely (e.g. Mariko). So, someone (possibly myself) needs to identify the actual locations of these stations and make the wikilinks point to the correct pages. LordAmeth 11:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried it. やってみました。こんなもんでいかがでしょうか。 Please someone remake it better. AyaseHarukazeboy 18:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: すごい！どうもありがとう。LordAmeth 00:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note: To-do. 

message: I agree that the historic Tokaido Road should have its own article. The general word "Tokaido" can direct to a disambiguation page (this one). The specific article would also discuss the print series done for the road by various artists such as Hiroshige. Currently "Tokaido Road" directs to a novel by Lucia St. Clair Robson. However, this is a bit like Route 66 being directed to a song title instead of the historic road. - Parsa 19:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the section is totally redundant now, so I removed it and linked to the main article.  The disambiguation needed major trimming as well, and that "armani of karate apparel" line needs to be fact checked or removed. -- Exitmoose 02:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokaido Road
Talk:How Do U Want It

message: Are you serious?! Is there a source for this? if it is true, thats pretty sad.
==Song title==
Isn't the correct title of this song "How Do U Want It"? It's right there on the single cover image in the article. -- eo 18:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: She later stated those songs ruined her sex life and her personal life.

message: Isn't the correct title of this song "How Do U Want It"? It's right there on the single cover image in the article. -- eo 18:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song title

message: I have an mp3 of this song, but instead of kc & jojo on the hook its Tupac and Natasha Walker. I believe this is the original mix of the track. Contact me for proof: csksiccmadeps3@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.208.241 (talk) 23:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Version