Talk:SM Town

message: Why did you remove Lay Zhang profile from exo band's main information page (as a musician)
Don't you know he is still in the group 
Please put his profile back as a exo member in the group information page with his fellow members  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.56.96.164 (talk) 22:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

message: Why isn't the 2003 Winter SM Town Album (with Snow Flake) included in here?  Small5th (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 Winter SM Town 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on SM Town. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150210094252/http://www.whowired.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=403729 to http://www.whowired.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=403729
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Why did we need a full list of members? It's basically every SM artist, it would be redundant to maintain. 02:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't need it. SM Town is literally the name given to every person signed to SM similar to YG Family or JYP nation. The list of members and associated acts just isn't needed at all. The lead section literally states it is an 'umbrella name' for all artists signed to SM. I’d say it can all easily be removed, and if the original editor disagrees they can come get a consensus for the changes they want. Alexanderlee (talk) 07:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

text: I agree, it's unnecessary and should be removed. Random86 (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Worse, the associated acts are just their groups. An associated act isn't a subset of themselves, that's just dumb. I'll remove it and let the OP come back here for consensus. Evaders99 (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Listing everyone would be like listing everyone who participated in Band Aid it just isn’t needed. Alexanderlee (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Except, they’re listed in the “participants” section, not in the information box which you made way too long by adding everyone. This article has a members section which already links to the list of SM artists on the SM article, and that is enough Alexanderlee (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of members 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: SM Town →  – In the Korean media and news, along with its agency SM Entertainment, its used as SMTOWN not merely for styling but its own registered trademark, that includes all its component articles with SM Town here on Wikipedia ReVeluv02 (talk) 11:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose SMTOWN is a trademark and MOS:TMRULES says . (An exception would be if the trademark were an acronym but this isn't.) Also WP:TITLEFORMAT says . On both these grounds and the fact that SM Town is equivalent in meaning to "The group of artists who are affiliated to SM entertainment" makes the current title perfectly acceptable. The redirect is already in place. Mike Turnbull (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 January 2022