lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:She-Devil (1989 film)

message: * The characters described on the page are extremly different. So to say they are antigonism of a perspective in the man#s world.
Please set a gender frame in writing about such figures! The plot acts on this differences but without a reasonable analysis of structure. Is it about woman earning money?! By dealing affirmativ with klishees. Or is it about revenge of a she devil, who has got another shape than the advertisment ideal? Lustfull revenge in  a comedy frame..... and earning money in doing so!
One half of the world is female and has got their own perspectives!--Danaide (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Female figures!'''
File talk:Clash of Civilizations world map.png

message: Is Albania really classified as "Western" by Huntingdon? Slac speak up! 05:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: not sure but have changed Albania to muslim now as per Talk:Clash of Civilizations discussion.  --Astrokey44 12:19, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Armenia and Bosnia aren't Eastern Orthodox countries... Saimdusan Talk|Contribs 07:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Orthodox"
Talk:Key signature (cryptography)

message: The text in this article seems to describe a "public key fingerprint", for which an article already exists.  The term "key signature" is not one I've heard before, and I can't find any google references for this use of it.  I suggest deleting this article.
Trevp 05:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does describe a somewhat broader concept. One could exchange hashes of symmetric keys, for example. I'm under the impression that NSA cryptosystems add some sort of signature to symmetric keys to insure only authorized keys are used. I added a see also ref to Public key fingerprint--agr 09:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Public key fingerprint
Template talk:Road index

message: This template states explicitly that the page on which it appears is a disambiguation page, but it also adds it to a list category.  The titles of the pages, from what I can tell, begin with "List of...".  Guidelines for disambiguation pages are very different from guidelines for lists, so it doesn't seem to make sense to try to make these pages both.  Are these list articles that can have images and could concievably become featured lists, or are they disambiguation pages that cannot have images and will never become featured anything? Neelix (talk) 02:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They're dab pages. Originally they were at simply "Route x", but someone moved them to "List of highways numbered x", possibly for clarification. Route x, State Route x, Highway x, etc all redirect to the List of highways numbered x article because non-roads editors can and do link just link to stuff like Highway 9 without realizing that there is a state highway 9 in just about every state and a U.S. route bearing that number too. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case, I propose that the disambiguation pages be renamed "Route x", "Highway x", etc. and that the category :Category:Lists of roads sharing the same title be renamed :Category:Ambiguous road names.  The images (namely the highway shields) should be removed from these pages as well.  These changes will remove the confusion about whether these are lists or disambiguation pages, as well as conforming the pages to disambiguation page guidelines. Neelix (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

text: They appear to me to be set index articles. I'm initiating a discussion at WT:DAB related to the pages this template is used on. Dekimasuよ! 03:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Dekimasu, these appear to be set index articles. Take a look at  to see an analogous template for SIAs. hike395 (talk) 17:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists or disambiguation pages? 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support: this template is analogous to  and  and should have a similar name. —hike395 (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Template talk:School disambiguation

message: Please remove the TFD tag per Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:Schooldis.  Thank you in advance. 134.253.26.12 (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 134.253.26.12, 15 December 2010 

message: This template is fully protected, which means that even administrators are not free to simply edit it at will. Today it was renamed, apparently without discussion. This template has 1,800 uses under the "Schooldis" name; the other name Template:School disambiguation seems to have no uses at all. Therefore, there seems to be no reason to rename this template, so I have moved it back to the established name. There is no policy or guideline which requires template names to have spaces or to use full words; abbreviations in template names have always been acceptable. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is this strange idea that templates used in articles should have understandable names, I know you have had a fun day going around undoing my work, and I hope you enjoyed it, but this template can have a better name, therefore it should have a better name. Simple as. Rich Farmbrough, 14:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As I pointed out, this template is fully protected. You are wheel warring. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed move 

message: Hi. Please undo this edit. The article feedback tool is now opt-in per-article. The blacklist category is no longer necessary. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove [[:Category:Article Feedback Blacklist]]
Talk:Key schedule

message: Doesn't this article belong in the Cryptographic Algorithms category, not the Key Management category?
Trevp 05:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I've changed it.--agr 09:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Article text states 56-bit keys (which I believe is correct) whereas the diagram states that there are 64 bits in the key (which I believe is wrong).  They should agree with each other, and (this would be helpful) both be right... JulesH 13:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, the image is incorrect. I commented it out until someone fixes it. -- intgr 13:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I believe the diagram is correct. The cipher is specified to accept a 64-bit key, but 8 of those bits are simply ignored by PC1, so it has an effective key size of only 56 bits. — Matt Crypto 14:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, okay; perhaps the diagram could be changed to reflect that more clearly? -- intgr 14:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Could do, or perhaps just a note in the caption would suffice if we think it's confusing.  The diagram was originally  intended to illustrate Data Encryption Standard#Key schedule, which explains the dropping of bits, and the meaning of PC-1/2 etc, in the text. — Matt Crypto 15:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DES key length
Talk:List of state schools in Scotland (city council areas)

message: Lists are a good source of information. However they may be dated and can sometimes be replaced by categories.
Victuallers 09:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools List

message: I've re-formatted this list to comply with the guidelines on stand-alone lists.  The key paragraph in the stand alone list guideline is that entries must either have an article or be reasonably expected to have one.  
Note that the speedy deletion policy now also allows for the removal of non-notable groups, so it's highly unlikely that that every entry on the old list would have an article that would "stick."
If anyone would like to attempt to write an article about any of the red links that were on this page they are all here.
brenneman 06:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of red links
Talk:Essanay Studios

message: It's probably unusual to have the same article in ChicagoWikiProject and SFBAProject, but we'll have to share this one until it is expanded sufficiently for the Niles studio to have a separate article.--Hjal 16:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome to the Golden State 
Talk:Chemotaxonomy

message: This article obviously needs some cleanup. Take a look at this diff, most of the content is from this edit, before this it was a stub. I'll put a cleanup tag on this article, when it looks okay, remove the tag. Delta Tango • Talk 06:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the above mentioned addition to a separate talk page. Articles really shouldn't be in the form of study notes, but it can still be used to help expand the article. See Talk:Chemotaxonomy/Temp. I'm removing the cleanup tag and stubbing the article. Delta Tango • Talk 06:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: What makes Jeffrey Harborne especially significant for Chemotaxonomy? How come "See also" links to the article about him? Delta Tango • Talk 06:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeffrey Harborne
Talk:Pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism

message: :Couldn't this be put into some layman's terms? Readers shouldn't have to click this and that link to figure it out. --ArtifexCrastinus 06:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree that it's a bit unintelligible, and I'll try to clean it up as I go. It's a complicated topic with not a lot of recent or hard information. Keep on truckin' Cpt ricard (talk) 22:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Henry Hamilton Beamish

message: Yours truly, --Ludvikus 06:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mariano Procópio Museum

message: I've grown bored of this article... I may come back to it when I can fact-check it better, but not now. If anyone wants to continue translating, note that I missed a couple subsections in the middle. Best of luck, if anyone sees this. Grandmasterka 06:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alexander Kazantsev

message: The compilation "Soviet Science Fiction" by Asimov includes two of his stories; "A Visitor from Outer Space" is about the Tunguska event being caused by a Martian spaceship exploding. --NE2 06:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National drug code

message: If a pharmacy sends an insurance claim to the insuree with an NDC such as "1144325678", how is anyone supposed to be able to discern the labeler, pkg. code or pkg. type.  I'd love to know.
There's no asterisk, so it's anyone's guess.
````Dan
:Sorry, Dan. Since neither 01144 nor 11443 represent valid codes in the NDC database (as of today, December 3, 2007), you may have transcribed the number incorrectly. However, your comment did inspire an update of the article to include a working example of how to determine exactly the information you have requested (assuming, of course, that the provider of the drug in question has complied with the law and registered their product with the FDA). cheers, JimScott 01:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

message: This article has undergone strange edits. It is not correct. I happen to be intimately involved with the edition of the NDC code, and so I know the rules. It is not an 11 digit system, but 10, and there is ambiguity and there will remain ambiguity. The limit of 10 digits is hard because of the way in which NDC folds into the GS1 product code. I will investigate the source of the edits and recover to a correct presentation. Gschadow (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to follow up, I have done the edits and it is correct again. Gschadow (talk) 15:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect 

message: “For example, 1234-5678-90, 12345-678-90, and 12345-6789-0 could all be entirely different products with the same barcode 1234567890. To prevent any actual ambiguity from impacting the marketplace, ambiguity checks are part of the new electronic listing process.”
The statement above is incorrect.  The four-digit labeler codes always start with a zero, and the five-digit labeler codes always start with a non-zero number. This convention is not explicitly part of the NDC definition, but was adopted by the FDA when the labeler codes were expanded from 3 to 5 digits.
Also, the corrections are incorrect; yes, the NDC is a 10 digit system, but some companies assigned five-digit labeler codes are allowed to use four-digit product codes and two-digit package codes, resulting in an eleven-digit number approved and listed in the National Drug Code Directory.
CaptainNeutral (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect
Talk:Musica (sculpture)

message: Pardon me if I'm wrong, but the "controversy" section of this article seems like it leans heavily against the side of those arguing against the statue, especially with the "Others were equally indignant." sentence. --Zpb52 06:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy section
Talk:Mini Lop

message: I have removed 3 of the 4 pictures on the page, as I believe they are excessive and one is sufficient to illustrate what the breed looks like. I have also shortened the description of the remaining picture as I believe it contains unnecessary information, such as the name given to the rabbit by the owner.
Weaselben 07:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate your interest in getting an accurate photo to depict this breed. I share that interest and want also for the List of rabbit breeds table to be accurate with its images. Could you direct us to an authoritative source for photos (esp. comparison photos) that could be imported to Wikipedia? Or could anyone else, perhaps, help with this? Thanks.  Timbuk-2 (talk) 16:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Excess Pictures 

message: Miniature Lop article SHOULD NOT be merged with Mini Lop article, as there are totally different breeds. Please be MORE PROFESSIONAL about it by doing some research before making any modifications. Please refer to British Rabbit Council and The National Miniature Lop Rabbit Club Websites for a clear breed standard description.  MiniatureLop (talk) 23:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miniature Lop article SHOULD NOT be merged with Mini Lop article 
Category talk:Swiss-Italian people

message: I am not exactly sure about how we should go about this, but in Switzerland, are post-Risorgimento Italian immigrants considered as Swiss Italians?
::not Swiss and can t answer the question but for time being I m going to rename the page for Swiss of post-Risorgimento descent and provide an explanation on the page for what it is meant to list Mayumashu 12:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[:Category:Italian-Swiss people]]
Talk:Tasmanian soccer championship

message: Which 1 is it? Boltonfan22 07:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New Town Eagles or Newtown Eagles

message: I am thinking that this article should become a state championship page including a section on the defunct state league, with a redirect from state league.  I will try to help out a bit, I did quite a bit of work on the Soccer/Football in Tas article.--TInTIn 05:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: State League vs. State Championship

message: Regarding this edit - surely people realise by now that when you move an Australian article with the world 'football' in it, it's going to be controversial and should be discussed first?  "Tasmanian association football (soccer) championships" - what a mouthful.  If there was another article at "Tasmanian football championships" then "Tasmanian football (soccer) championships" or "Tasmanian association football championships" would be suitable names, but it has been a couple of weeks since the move and the former name was still a redirect, so I moved it back.  Any better ideas, please discuss here. -- Chuq (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Someone has incorrectly listed the Victory Cup results in the list of champions for 2013 and 2014.  The Victory Cup was always treated and advertised as an additional, secondary piece of silverware and not the 'Champions of Tasmania', which has always been related to the top of the league.  The listing on this article relates to who is 'Champions of Tasmania', which as the article states has been achieved a couple of different ways, depending on the format of leagues at the time.  However currently the top of the league is considered to be the Champion, no the end of season finals' series.  Evidence of my point of view is the fact that the top of the league goes onto the national NPL finals and also the separate naming of the then Victory Cup and now known as League Cup.  Therefore unless I see any evidence to the contrary I will be replacing the two Victory Cup results and placing the league placings for 2013-2016 as Tasmanian Champions.  --TinTin (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Champions of T-League / Victory League / NPL Tasmania
Talk:National Grid (Malaysia)

message: This is a transmission related article. So I suggest to edit and reorganise as follows:
Add a section of electricity suppliers uploading onto the National Grid. With links to internal Wiki articles on these companies and each company's total installed capacity only, but their generation assets listed in each article by company. The hierarchy will: 
National Grid
*Electricity suppliers (utility companies)
**Individual power stations.
The current power stations listing will be moved to the utility companies' wiki article.
This way will reduce discrepancy in the power stations listing.
Xinhin 07:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ma Ji

message: This article is just a begining. I will provide sources to prove his fame.  Please wait for a while. OK? --Neo-Jay 07:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wait! Don't delete it in haste!
Talk:Hryhoriy Hulyanytsky

message: Please add a more descriptive lead asserting the guy's notability. "A skilled warrior and a shrewd politician" is quite inane, as he seems to have been a singularly unsuccessful politician. Furthermore, this phrasing may fail WP:PEACOCK. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jimmy Pedro

message: I don't know Jimmy Pedro, nor Have I ever heard of him before now. I have added his homepage link not as any sot of promotion. but because there is more extensive biographical information there as well as the list of titles he has won. Perhaps someone could expand this page to be just as detailed. EraserGirl (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: homepage
Talk:Philip S. Porter

message: I'm concerned with the lack of sources in this article, especially for the "Controversies" section. There appears to be no backing for any of the claims made in it - are there articles, references, etc., that could be inserted there? Tony Fox (arf!) 16:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed all unsourced criticism. I will add some back as I obtain sources. Other cats mentioned in criticism section regarding IJF and Kodokan are well-known facts sourced elsewhere on Wikipedia. I will, nevertheless, later add citations for those facts here as well.  --David from Downunder (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Thank you for looking into this.  I initiated the request that this article be reviewed in light of the unsubstantiated criticism of the subject.  I have added further remarks in Dave from Downunder's talk page. Soothsayer12 (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: It wasn't clear to me what this was referring to; I found it and for ease of lookup, it is here:  JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 06:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Category talk:Special effects

message: Surely Chris Corbould, no disagreement with his worth, does not belong under the "Special Effects" category? I believe there is a seperate section for luminaries. Sadly i don't have the ability to fix this myself. Can someone help please and take care of it? Thanks.
Outofthewoods (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Corbould
Talk:Ceffyl Pren

message: I've added the reference I have for the Ceffyl Pren and taken out the "need for verification" tags.
Much of the wording was taken from the reference, I trust I've made that clear enough.
There should be a disambiguation from Ceffyl Pren a Welsh language Glam Rock group of the Mid 80's - but I don't know how to !! Gwyn Doctor (talk) 21:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:COMPUSEC

message: User:JA.Davidson asked for details on why I tagged this article with . These tags are usually added in a rush just to indicate that they do not confirm to the Wikipedia Manual of Style and the adding editor cannot be bothered to clean them up. Here are some improvements that could be made:
* Perhaps the article should instead redirect to computer security, as has been done with COMSEC, INFOSEC, TRANSEC, etc?
* Capitalization per WP:MOSCAPS, for example, "Information Security", "Communication Security", etc are not proper nouns and thus should not be capitalized.
* Linking, WP:MOSLINK: it seems that more relevant phrases could be linked, such as "application", "computer", "security", "kernel" (for their general meanings)
* The lead paragraph appears to be quite long, maybe it could be split in two?
* Two typos/spelling errors that I just fixed.
I know these are pretty trivial and it would probably take less time to actually fix them to write this message, but I'm often working on other things when I look up things on Wikipedia, and can't be bothered to fix them myself at that moment. So, for the sake of an example, here's the list of things that should be done. :) -- intgr 07:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My cleanup tag
Talk:W. R. Myers High School

message: There simply isn't enough information there for an article. This one itself is short, and the information can easily fit here. -- Phoenix2 (talk, review) 16:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is plenty of information out there for an article though.  Give me a couple days to expand it. Resolute 05:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's 3 articles: the school, the shooting and the shooter's bio. I say merge the shooter's bio into the shooting first, then consider whether to merge that shooting article into the school. I also say give particular care to whether to fully identify the shooter as per official policy: WP:BLP#Articles about living people notable only for one event and my points on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 50#Naming Canadian young offenders Canuckle 16:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also concerned that merging a shooting into a school profile will make the school article unbalanced due to tone and length of the shooting article. Look forward to hearing your thoughts. Canuckle 16:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

text: No Merger - this is a separate article, and should be under "See Also" in the school article. PianoKeys 11:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge in the shooting article
Talk:Lake Gregory (Western Australia)

message: On maps and atlases this lake is either named Gregory Lake or Lake Gregory, but in the official place names [gazette] at Geoscience Australia it is listed as Lake Gregory. —PeterWH 05:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Dead ball (cricket)

message: The name of the man who hit the roof is irrelevant and should remain as just an Australian batsamn. This is notice given that the removal of the name is being discussed and if no comments are made in 14 days then inserting the name will be removed per this discusion.--134.225.235.40 10:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name