Talk:Dual-use technology

message: How long the list can be?  To be a little extreme, a screw driver was used to fasten armor of a knight back in the middle ages.  More current example could include radar, computer and internet?
We should add a list of things labeled as dual-use technology by various governments and organizations, things like tritium and graphite. Matteboy2001 21:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Related link: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/05/dualuse_technol_1.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.95.124.58 (talk) 08:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term "dual-use" can have many meanings.  It can refer to any technology that has more than one use.  However, in the context of this entry it generally has two meanings.  First, it refers to technology that has both civilian and military uses, such as night-vision systems.  In the nuclear context it has a different meaning.  It refers to technology that has both nuclear and non-nuclear uses, such as maraging steel.  See IAEA Document INFCIRC/254 Part 1 http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/2006/infcirc254r8p1.pdffor the Nuclear Suppliers Group export control guidelines for nuclear items, and INFCIRC/254 Part 2 http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/2006/infcirc254r7p2.pdf for the corresponding guidelines for nuclear-related dual-use items. NPguy 00:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More common definition of dual-use 

message: Hello guys,
I am making some work on dual-use technologies US and Canadian regulations, and for that I need precise legal references. The fact is I can't find any (for example, US Bureau of Industry and Security explain how to be compliant to US legislation, but does not give the precise legal text). Can you help me please ? Does ITAR law covers dual-use technologies in US ? 
Thank you guys :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.82.232.1 (talk) 10:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US and Canadian Law for dual-use technologies ? 

message: So, on my screen at least, someone wrote "GAY!" in all caps right above "Nuclear". I have searched the revision history and code and can't find a way to remove it.46.235.154.89 (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick Vandalism Edit Help 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dual-use technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120121132914/http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/roundtables/nuclear-energy-different-other-energy-sources to http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/roundtables/nuclear-energy-different-other-energy-sources
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721161219/http://www.centrovolta.it/landau/content/binary/Fostering%20the%20Biosecurity%20NormFinal.pdf to http://www.centrovolta.it/landau/content/binary/Fostering%20the%20Biosecurity%20NormFinal.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613102309/http://www.brad.ac.uk/bioethics/Monographs/ to http://www.brad.ac.uk/bioethics/Monographs/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *This is currently under the "External Links" Section, although it is currently a Dead Link
*By accident pre-noticing it on this page i encountered it in this link:
* https://irp.fas.org/threat/mctl98-2/mctl98-2.pdf
*This Apprears to be Well Backed Up on The Wayback Machine
*Thus should i swap the external link to either of those?
--Eric Lotze (talk) 14:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Militarily Critical Technologies List (MCTL)