lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Affect (philosophy)

message: This is completely incomprehensible. Sorry, I don't have the knowledge to improve it. Just thought I'd let everyone know.
71.58.151.144
:It could certainly do with some development, I might have a look at it tonight, but more needs doing! 129.234.4.76 (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still makes close to no sense, anyone care to elaborate? --82.27.236.224 (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Marginal Revolution (blog)

message: This is one of the most popular blogs on the web.  The fact that it was nominated for deletion is absolutely ludicrous. Tyrannicide 01:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: The slogan explains why the blog is called "Marginal Revolution" so therefore I think it's relevant. WP:Avoid mission statements is just an essay. N I H I L I S T I C (talk) 02:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for including the slogan 
Talk:KIDK

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KPVI-DT

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers  Deconstructhis (talk) 13:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:KIFI-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers  Deconstructhis (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: * Kifi {m} [Jargon: Kindesmissbrauchstäter (Kinderficker)] - chester [slang] [child molester]
* "Kifi" ist die Abkürzung für Kinderficker und kann für ältere Männer verwendet werden, die eine sehr junge Freundin haben.
Sorry, i am writing this, because a friend here in Germany has made a joke with this jargon about this TV-station.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.248.158.153 (talk) 02:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  just an info: be careful - KiFi is in german a bad word 
Talk:KVUI

message: Someone wants more information about KFXP-TV from sign on to the disaffiliation from Fox. The reality is that there is little to tell. The station signed on channel 31 analog and then flash cut to digital transmission when the FCC mandated changeover kicked in. KPVI-TV moved to the Sherman St. studios with space for an additional station and built out the technical area for KFXP. They have always operated and sold it.
The only programming history of note is the news broadcast, no other local content has aired on the station. There was some concern around the time of sign-on about receiving the signal north of Idaho Falls mostly because of NFL football coverage since UHF does not travel as far as VHF and no translators were built. Local cable systems and satellite TV providers (eventually, at the same time they picked up KIDK/KIFI/KPVI/KISU) picked up the signal for retransmission. It replaced the national feed of Fox programming on Cable One.
Please note, this archived article also contains a brief history about the entry of Fox into eastern Idaho broadcast on KIDK-TV (1993) and moving back to cable TV only. http://www.postregister.com/story.php?accnum=00895-07161998&today=1998-07-16 (July 16, 1998 - News Sections of Post Register.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.183.163 (talk) 03:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Ally Sloper

message: Hello, as the creator of this here site, with its admittedly limited information, I suggest that perhaps the information in this and the Ally Sloper's Half Holiday wikipedia entry be merged into a single larger article. Any thoughts?
:It's a thought.  Which page do you reckon is the better one to keep as the main page, to which the other would redirects?  Whilst I'm here, good work on the page but would you be offended if I asked if you happen to remember or have to hand any sources for this information? Hiding  talk 14:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Half holiday

message: Is it really necessary to have links to the Yellow Kid and Obadiah Oldbuck in this article? 41.245.182.70 (talk) 08:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Hello, I'm new to editing on Wiki so apologies in advance for any errors. I noticed the title on the supporting image of this page is incorrect. It states that the panels are from 'Some of the Mysteries of Loan & Discount' (which was the very first Ally Sloper strip in Judy, published 14th August 1867). However, the panels shown are from an Ally Sloper strip entitled 'Iky Mo Unlocks a Secret' which was published in Judy on 2nd March 1870. --JohnCNash (talk) 21:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect title on image
Talk:Predictive dialer

message: Most of the information on Hosted predictive dialer appears to be written like a product feature list from an advertisement and is not unique to hosted predictive dialers.  The topic of hosted predictive dialing could easily be incorporated into the Predictive dialer article as another type using the provided description, including the Pros and Cons section.  Recommend merge with PD. Calltech 23:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Hosted predictive dialer recommendation 

message: Merged hosted predictive dialer article into Types section.  Any improvements and suggestions would be appreciated. pgaz 14:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged 

message: Smart Dialer:  I have never come across this term before. Is it in widespread use?
Also, voice broadcasting is not legal in the UK unless prior agreement from the recipient has been obtained. The relevant law is the Telecommunications Act 2003, under which OFCOM (the regulator) has the ability to decide what constitutes "persistent abuse" of the network. Voice Broadcasting is considered "persistent abuse".
There are also several regulatory issues affecting the use of predictive dialing technology in the US and UK. The article does not discuss these. Should it?
The article defines silent or nuisance calls as calls where no agent is available to talk to a connected call. These are normally termed "abandoned" calls, with the term "silent" or "nuisance" call being used to include mis-classified answer machines (the person called cannot normally tell the difference between a call that was hung up because no-one was there and a call the system decided was an answering machine).
In the UK, regulation can be summarised as:
(1)  If a predictive dialler has to abandon a call because there is no agent available, the dialler should play a brief recorded message stating the name of the business and a telephone number the call recipient can ring. This must be done within 2 seconds of the call being answered;
(2) These abandoned calls should not exceed 3% of all the live calls made within a 24 hour period;
(3) All calls should ring for a minimum of 15 seconds before being disconnected and classified as “no answer”;
(4) All calls must present a Calling Line ID (CLI) to which a return call can be made.
Davidgroves 10:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various comments 

message: I believe with advent of host based processing answering machine detection and voice processing are easy to do now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.246.33.54 (talk) 07:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign all comments here on the talk page using 4 tildes (~) as is recommended at the top of this page.  Removed the AMD comments per your recommendation. Calltech 11:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft dialers !!!
Talk:Crontab format

message: Wikipedia shouldn't look like a man page. Does anyone has an objection that this page will just redirect to crontab?--Amir E. Aharoni 08:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect sounds good to me. --Alynna 03:24, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete/redirect?
Talk:Shiho Niiyama

message: *I'm a big fan of Ms. Niiyama's work, but it is not necessary to list everything she's ever done on Wikipedia.  There are other sites that specialize in this kind of thing.  If you're not willing to wikify your work, this is what happens.  Danny Lilithborne 09:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable roles
Talk:Trousseau sign

message: I have made carpopeddal spasm a redirect page to this page. Supten 05:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Normally every topic should be treated on its own page. JFW | T@lk 15:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a friend to a 38 year old woman who was diagnosed with MS 4 years ago. She has since had many issues that have been unexplaned. We have been doing research on our own to try to come up with some answers. The doctors in our area throw their hands up in the air and say"Deal with it". We have a few things that lead us to Trousseau's. .....Phlebitis with I.V.s lymphatonopathy,hypocalcemia, hypercoagulable state, thick viceral tissue, extra boney growth in her mouth, increased weight loss, endometreosis. Don't know where to turn. No Physician can direct. We  live in northeastern Ohio. Please Help. E-mail  le_emt@yahoo.com.     Elena Caruso24.50.231.193 21:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help
Talk:Laser range scanner

message: probably this page could be deleted and we should use 3d scanner instead. (ALoopingIcon 09:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:58, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Chorionic villi

message: This article is confusing, it's very poorly written. It doesn't even define the chorionic villi properly. Can someone do something about it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.184.30.18 (talk) 13:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: I am considering developing this page further as part of an educational assignment in Fall of 2013. If someone else is also working on this, please send me a message and let me know soon, so we donʼt duplicate initial efforts in page development. Vicktory7 (talk) 20:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developmental Bio Project
Talk:Parashurama

message: X -> There is a temple for Parashurama in Thiruvallam near Thiruvananthapuram Kerala.
Y-> The Thiruvallam Sree Parasurama Temple is an ancient temple situated on the banks of the Karamana river in Thiruvallam, Thiruvananthapuram.The only temple dedicated to Parasurama in Kerala, it is one of the 108 Abhimana Kshethram of the Vaishnavite tradition.A protected monument under the Archeological Department of Kerala, it is also listed under the Monuments of National Importance by the Archeological Survey of India. One of the important traditions of this temple is bali tharpanam, where devotees prepare tributes of traditional ritual food to offer to the ancestors(pitrukkal) on karkidaka vavu. 202.88.249.41 (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  17:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 January 2024
Talk:Interaction energy

message: This article should be merged with potential energy which is the same thing as interaction energy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phmer (talk • contribs) 09:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, interaction energies are used in completely different settings, although they are related. Salsb 12:48, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto, no merge. Interaction energies, in protein-protein dynamics, are formulated in terms of positive (repulsive) and negative (attractive) Gibbs free energies.  The sum of the total interaction energies for a respective process determines if it will be favored. --Sadi Carnot 11:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[potential energy]] 

message: This article should be merged with collision or elastic collision to further explain these concepts or even just be linked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ΨΙΚΙΡΕΔΙΑ (talk • contribs) 01:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[collision]] or [[elastic collision]]
Talk:Christian Research Institute

message: This write up needs to be trimmed down to just being about the Christian Research Institute. I think it could and should be made 1/3 the size. While other information seems notable, its often not directly related to this group. Basileias (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What this needs
Talk:Benazepril

message: This ACE inhibitor was associated with improvements in proteinuria and delayed progression of renal failure in a cohort with mild-to-moderate chronic renal failure. JFW | T@lk 09:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Cycle notation

message: What is the algorithmic complexity of decomposing a permutation into those cycles?
:Seems O(n) to me: you start with the first element, compute the output of the permutation, and use that as input. If the output is the first element again, you start over with another unused element, the used elements are one cycle. Each element of the permutation will be used exactly once, and the cycles will be disjoint (this is the exact technique used to prove the theorem). I don't think it'd be possible to do in a better time.
::You should sign your name. Zyszys (talk) 13:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Technological literacy

message: Hi,   There seems to have been an error in edit recently (about 17 Sep 2010) that incorrectly assumed Technacy Theory and its research basis in Australian Government reports and recommendations, and peer reviewed research journals is referring to the same ideas as "Technological Literacy".  This error of fact, must be corrected.  There are two ways to do this.  The preferred is to re-instate the separate article that was in place before it was somehow inadvertently linked back to "Technological Literacy", or for the Article on Technological Literacy to have a new heading section in it to refer to Technacy theory and its research links. As I do not know how to re-create the original article, I recommend it is embedded as a heading section inside this one.
Nintiblue
-------------
Hi! I added a redirect from Technological competency to this page. It would probably be better if someone created an article on technological competency, but it's not my subject area. --Malcohol 10:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jet

message: I would argue that Jetstar (and possibly other companies listed here) are not acutally otherwise known as "Jet".  I don't think that they should be listed here just becuase they have the syllable "jet" in their name, unless they really are often referred to in shorthand as "Jet". - DanFlett (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jetstar and other companies

message: This should redirect to a disambiguation page or something. -Iopq 11:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page about jet planes?

message: I have cleaned up the page. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 11:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely done!  =)  Powers 13:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Flat Duo Jets or "the Jets"
Reverting edit 
Johnvr4 (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flat Duo Jets "the Jets" 

message: BASIC  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.91.5.161 (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  C R  S
Talk:Poppet

message: Is the term 'poppet' commonly used to describe a representation of divinity, like a corn dolly? I'm more familiar with the term being used for a doll for healing/binding etc. of a person. Possibly the article needs rearranging so the image-magic section comes first. I also think the description of different materials of construction needs to be broken up between the two uses. Corn shafts, carved roots, fruit and branches correspond to the agricultural divinity dolls, and wax, paper, clay or rags correspond to the image-magic dolls. I don't know where the potato fits (but I know some Irish chefs who claim to know 50 different recipes for spud!). Comments please? Fuzzypeg 10:24, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poppets as divinities, or for sympathetic magic

message: Definition: A poppet is a small doll or figure that represents a person in a ritual or spell. These items are NOT evil things for you to stick pins into. Poppets are frequently used in healing spells, and are usually hand-sewn and stuffed with the appropriate herbs. Magick of this kind is common in Santeria.
:If this is out of a book, a reference would be really helpful. Most of the work here is in tracking down decent references to cite. We have the information in our heads, but can we verify it? Fuzzypeg☻ 01:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  poppet talk! 

message: I have tagged the page as requiring additional sources. There are only three references; two are to books - which although I haven't read I will assume are appropriate. However, the third is to a QI episode. The link given is to the Wikipedia page for the episode which makes no reference to the term poppet. In addition to this, I don't think 2/3 sources or references is enough verification. Drmotley (talk) 21:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag: Sources 

message: — Assignment last updated by Tania-ctz (talk) 23:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the page edits made during this course assignment were somewhat unhelpful and may need to be removed but I wanted to bring it up here first - The "German Kitchen Witch" section is already better represented on the Kitchen witch page, which is linked in the first paragraph. The rest of the information added is sourced entirely on an article on craft ideas and misrepresented here as historical information. ThunderTiki (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Art and Ritual
Talk:Certification

message: Added types of certification into: Exam-based and Education-based. 
This is from: Dr. Magdy Hanna, IIST Chairman & CEO (2006): The Value of Certification for Software Test and Quality Professionals .
Also added to the existing softwaretest certification other ones.
--Erkan Yilmaz 16:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  in IT Industry 

message: I can't possibly imagine that this one instance of "Certification" should get its own section.  It should be addressed in the list of examples down below.
TheodoreLarson (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd Party Forest Certification 

message: Certification may include recognition of meeting standards for the purpose of government selection or recognition, or marks for consumer-targeted uses.
Certification may refer to standards or systems, and marks are TMs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WalletFeminist (talk • contribs) 22:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing between certification and certification marks