Talk:Jóhann Jóhannsson

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jóhann Jóhannsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161016172055/http://www.ausersmanual.org/ to http://www.ausersmanual.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jóhann Jóhannsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050216162711/http://www.touchmusic.org.uk/Biographies/johannjohannsson.html to http://www.touchmusic.org.uk/Biographies/johannjohannsson.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091215111822/http://www.this.is/kitchenmotors/ to http://www.this.is/kitchenmotors/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061016000035/http://www.beggars.com/us/johannjohannson/index.html to http://www.beggars.com/us/johannjohannson/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There seems to be some disagreement about the reliability of this source. User:Kaniinsideout removed it on grounds that the cause of death has never been made publis, and the cited source, BZ, is a "German tabloid known for gossip stories about celebrities". I am inclined to agree with this assessment. However, User:Herr chagall (who I see is an experienced Wikipedia editor) restored the claim together with the same citation, only without offering an explanation. It seems to me this needs to be settled here.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. What say you, Kaniinsideout?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hadn't seen the notification sooner, because I wasn't logged in. While it is correct that BZ is on the tabloid spectrum, in such cases they have their ear close to the (usually unnamed) sources who share the details. Just like other journalists, they have their network of official and unofficial contacts. Take the (admittedly more extreme) instance of TMZ and the stories they broke first. Will readd it as the info provided (cause of death) is correct. Cheers. --esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 12:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

text: The problem with the BBC story is that it's almost seven months older than the Variety story. The BBC can only report on what has been stated at the time; we'd need a BBC story from September or later to go with the claim that the cause is still unknown. —C.Fred (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source?