Talk:Intuit Mint

message: is this an ad? there should be articles on other similar websites like wesabe.com,or expensr.com and Geezeo.com to balance things out.98.195.185.125 15:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, there should be pages created for the other free personal finance type applications as well. --05runner (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea. --Explodicle (T/C) 18:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and create them. :) --יהושועEric (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not feel this is an ad.  I was already aware of the site, but being unfamiliar with it I came here looking for a NPOV explaination of it's reliability/security.  I agree information on other sites should be added. Yoda of Borg (talk) 19:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the NPOV tag to the discussion about the security of the site, as it definitely doesn't read as neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.142 (talk) 17:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely not an ad...  Dmarquard (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

text:  Is it possible (IANAL) that the limited power of attorney is what enables Mint/Intuit to retrieve your financial information? It's protected very strenously otherwise. I personally appreciated an update on the manual transaction feature, as they didn't used to have that. Information on competitors is a must.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.158.0.2 (talk) 20:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential for expansion 

message: I removed a paragraph with some pretty heavy POV about the security of the site, calling the creators "dishonest" and saying they "should" worry more about security. 74.92.148.250 (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Several sections including awards, finances, and security concerns need expansion.  Please make an effort to help this article get better. --יהושועEric (talk) 22:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Needs 

message: I removed the Competitors section.  It was, and has been, a marketing tool for Mint's competitors, none of which have a "competitors" section of their own.  It is inappropriate for Mint's entry.  There is already a Comparison_of_personal_financial_management_online_tools.  That is the appropriate location for a comprehensive list of competitors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Octavecat (talk • contribs) 05:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competitors 

message: There is a sentence near the beginning of the article that reads as follows:
"On April 19, 2010, Mint.com announced expansion in its reach to connect securely and to download transactions from virtually every bank, credit union and credit card account in the United States with online banking capability."
I recently tried Mint.com because Quicken just shut down their own online service.  Mint.com could not connect like Quicken could with my accounts at the following:
* Bank of America
* Chase
* Navy Federal Credit Union (the largest credit union in the country)
* ING Direct
I know, I know this is all original research, blah blah blah.  But the rather strong claim in the current article relies on dead link from MarketWatch.
MarketWatch does present some original articles and analysis but the vast majority of their content is reprinted press releases.  
Now I'm not saying my original research should be in the article but neither should a presumed press release, in my opinion.  What do others think about striking this sentence until Mint's connections with banks is established one way or the other by an independent source?RevelationDirect (talk) 03:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lying Press Releases vs. Original Research 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Mint.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110126083654/http://satisfaction.mint.com/mint/topics/can_mint_be_used_outside_of_the_u_s?from_gsfn=true to http://satisfaction.mint.com/mint/topics/can_mint_be_used_outside_of_the_u_s?from_gsfn=true
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101219075553/http://www.mint.com/what-is-mint/ to http://www.mint.com/what-is-mint/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214203643/http://blog.mint.com/blog/updates/how-mints-smartsave%E2%84%A2-savings-engine-works/ to http://blog.mint.com/blog/updates/how-mints-smartsave%E2%84%A2-savings-engine-works/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100511234408/http://blog.quicken.intuit.com/announcement/2009/11/02/intuit-completes-acquisition-of-mint-com/ to http://blog.quicken.intuit.com/announcement/2009/11/02/intuit-completes-acquisition-of-mint-com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 September 2020