Talk:Jesus Freak (album)

message: theres another song on this album called "Lord I Got Victory" - a google search for "DC Talk" and "Gospel Clip" will give you the lyrics
 The world can't do me no harm [do me no harm]
 Time's I've been wounded [uh huh]
 My battle scars do show [well, well, well]
 I'm going through the storm
 I'm blind in rain, I'm goin' on in Jesus' name
 Lord, I got victory [hallelujah]
 Over the enemy [glory, glory]
 And the world, it can't do me no harm
 [Do me no harm]
Where did this song come from? I can't find any mentions of it other than in connection with the Jesus Freak album. Is it actually an old Negro spiritual or is it just something that DC Talk made up? Maybe there's some obscure gospel record somewhere that it came from. --75.10.36.139 21:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lord, I Got Victory" 

message: The fact that of the three professional reviews that are included, one is from a fansite of the band in question and another is from a website whose creation is described as "influenced by" this album strikes me as odd.  Is there a reason to include two otherwise non-notable reviewers? Murphyr 06:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional Reviews 

message: :Image:Jesus freak.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Jesus freak.jpg

message: Every time I read this article I want to add a section on "Notoriety" and try to encapsulate, some of the less tangible impacts this album had on the fans, the industry and the doors it opened musically to future bands and artists.  Proving it is a challenge, though I know it to be so, and being new to the 'pedia somewhat unsure of what allowance for such forms of commentary are acceptable.  I can find all sorts of quotes regarding the impact it had as a milestone within the genre, many from album reviews or top-10-something-lists of all time.  Ultimately however when I start, all I really have is an opinionated statement supported by more opinionated statements.  But if somebody can come up with a substantiated way to say what I'm thinking, I'd love it. BazookajoeReno (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia!  Thanks for your interest in improving this article.  Opinionated statements are often acceptable in Wikipedia if they are (1) attributed and (2) referenced to reliable sources.  "Attributed" means that the sentence names the person with that opinion.  Here's a made-up example:  Johny Q. Jones, music critic for the San Diego Something, wrote that the success of Jesus Freak helped open doors for other Christian bands to be heard on secular radio stations.  Reliable sources here include CCMMagazine.com, Biilboard, Entertainment Weekly and major newspapers.  Fan sites are not reliable sources.  In addition, I think that "Impact" would be a better name than "Notoriety" for the section.  Let me know if you have more questions.  -- JTSchreiber (talk) 04:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think what I'll do is start a running collection of such references and quotes on my user page and when I have enough valid sources (both web and print), I'll take a stab at it (fully expecting edits will follow, of course).  Should be fun.  BazookajoeReno (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds good.  -- JTSchreiber (talk) 04:23, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notoriety

message: Aside from the review, there is nothing that makes this special edition notable. It should be merged into the main article for the album. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Good info but no reason to have that info separate. Royalbroil 05:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Jesus Freak: 10th Anniversary Special Edition]]