lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Columbia Montrail

message: Montrail is a leader in the ultrarunning community, not just with creating trail running shoes, but was one of the first of its kind to embrace the sports of trail running and ultrarunning with events for these athletes. It is important to the history of the sport, and has been featured in Backpacker Magazine, Runner's World, NY Times, Outside Magazine, TrailRunner Magazine, etc. The company also sponsors the Western States 100 Mile Endurance Run, the premier ultrarunning event in the US. The company sponsors 88 ultrarunning athletes, and donates to various charities. Blively07 23:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to assure it does not get nominated for deletion, work all the features listed above into the article as sources. As a Portland company you may want to try the Portland Business Journal as well. Aboutmovies 23:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And if you work for Columbia Sportswear, be sure to read our conflict of interest guidelines. Thanks. Katr67 18:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creator comments
Talk:Bunmahon

message: YA ya ya..Bonmahon is klas  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.33.74.149 (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cappoquin

message: I'm fairly sure the English should be 'Conn's tillage plot', since Choinn is the tuiseal ginideach (genitive) of Conn, and Conn is actually a name. Anyone? Hol-Tangings (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. And changed. Very belatedly. For the reasons noted. And (more importantly) because that's what the sources state. Guliolopez (talk) 00:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation? 
Talk:Libertarian Party (Brazil)

message: I Object to the proposed deletion of this article on the following grounds:
1) There are countless examples of unregistered parties from all over the world that have their own article in Wikipedia. In the case of Brazil, the current legislation on the creation of new parties is extremely restrictive and so not being currently registered with the electoral court doesn't mean much. According to the party's website, the biggest hurdles right now are financial and bureaucratic issues, but it is likely that its unregistered status will not last for long.
2) The deletion of the article in the Portuguese Wikipedia was to a great extent motivated by a political dispute and was approved on a simple-majority vote by a handful of editors and admins who did not offer any argument to substantiate their choice. So, for one thing, the "procedures" adopted by the Portuguese wiki are far from reliable. The political dispute involved can be seen in the archived discussions and the fact that articles on far less known and even obscure new parties were left untouched over there (and even defended from deletion by the same editors who voted to delete LIBER's article). Anyway, once the official registration of the party is confirmed, the page will be back in, as an agreed compromise with one of the admins.
I personally don't have much time now (even as I write this, I am busy with a translation, and so will stop here) but I'm going to add some more details to the article soon. In fact, the text could be easily improved by anyone who knows a little Portuguese and is acquainted with libertarianism, as the party's website is quite straightforward. Ko'oy 23:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia in comics

message: I have noW redefined Wikipedia:Wikipedia in cartoons so it does not include comics.  Comics and cartoons are different types of material so I feel that they are worthy of separate pages.  -- Alan Liefting talk 23:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds good, though it is very short now! I'll suggest that we leave the merge tags up for 24 hours, then remove them if nobody else has commented here. Thanks :) --Quiddity 00:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I just read a Dilbert cartoon recently about wikipedia but I forgot most of it so I decided not to add it in case I'm not accurate.  Arthur Fonzarelli (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dilbert

message: What do you think of the addition of the Zits strip?  Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zits 

message: The "Oh No Robot" search engine can be a powerful tool to help expand this article. Here is every result for web comics with the word "wikipedia" on them. Mateussf (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Search engine: Oh No Robot
Talk:Tramore

message: Just to let you know, the "tramore.ie" website is very outdated and is no longer in operation. I have changed the link to a newer one "www.discovertramore.ie". 
Iv read the article, and there are some grammer and heading changes that need to be done. Ill work on this later, and add more to the history of the town. 
Cheers.
Sully 21:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot about this. Going to revise the article where appropriate shortly. Discover Tramore link was removed as it was considered commerical, which is not the case. It might be more appropriate to have the Discover Tramore as an external link, and the town council website as the town website link though? --Sully (talk) 01:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Website & Other

message: Ha! Tramore has possibly more shipwrecks than any other bay in Ireland. Absolutely dozens going back hundreds of years. I dont know where to get a good reference but the doctors above the chemist on Main Street has several old old maps on the wall including the wrecks going all the way back. Easily around forty or more peacetime wrecks! "The Bay of Shipwrecks"</br>ThisMunkey (talk) 23:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea Horse Tragedy 

message: The population of Tramore almost doubled between 1971 and 1981. Can this be correct? RashersTierney (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Population
Talk:Villierstown

message: ==Untitled==
This entry needs further citations. A separate entry for Dromana House may also be more appropriate, an article was written last year if i remember correctly in the Irish Examiner Property Section by Mary Lealand. It's not currently available online but it gave a history of the house that could be of use here
Padraigobrian (talk) 21:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: This entry needs further citations. A separate entry for Dromana House may also be more appropriate, an article was written last year if i remember correctly in the Irish Examiner Property Section by Mary Lealand. It's not currently available online but it gave a history of the house that could be of use here
Padraigobrian (talk) 21:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hoa Nguyen

message: Name needs diacritics. Badagnani (talk) 03:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diacritics

message: From her photo, she appears caucasian; is she part Vietnamese and part North American or European? Badagnani (talk) 00:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heritage

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* Tables may be used to organise short stories, poems and/or book reviews. 
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 02:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Tioga River (Chemung River tributary)

message: What is the origin of this place name? Badagnani (talk) 02:13, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this website  it is a Cayuga word, meaning "At the Forks" Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 17:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Old and New Lights

message: Lots of confusion here, and I don't see the point to being confused...during the Great Awakening in NJ especially the debates at Cape May, that occurred in the early 1700s the term "New Light" was used specifically to refer to the Presbyterians, and the term "Old Light" was used specifically to refer to the Baptists. There is some stuff about this at the State Library at Trenton, and there was a 19th C Book called something like "History of the Baptists" to which RADM HF Stout (an authority on the Finley Family of Presbyterian New Light Ministers) refers in his History of the Stout Family. The Stouts were appearantly Baptists, and I think maybe this book which I think is c 1824 refers to the actual people involved in it. John5Russell3Finley 23:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: 2601:19B:C600:C509:4094:5766:8040:891C (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of "Newlights" in journal of Quaker minister 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Auld Licht and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Auld Licht" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Auld and New Licht and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Auld and New Licht" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Louis Cazeneuve

message: Just wondering if we know for a fact that he was naturalized. Many individuals live in the U.S. as resident aliens. Do we have a cite for this? --Tenebrae 17:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naturalized
Talk:Beverly Hills (disambiguation)

message: Is this:
Philippines.
* Beverly Hills (Cebu), Cebu, Philippines
the same as this[??]:
< http://antipolocity.com/history.htm >??
[[ hopiakuta  | [[ %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  -]] 00:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

message: &, then,  doctor 90210 ??
Thank You,
[[ hopiakuta  | [[ %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  -]] 00:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ 90210 ]] 

message: Hello. Is it possible to add an interwiki link to :tr:Beverly Hills (Turkish language) ?
Thanks <BIG><BIG><BIG>J</BIG></BIG></BIG>
87.64.158.67 (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: interwiki
Talk:Clonmacnoise

message: Does anybody know what was the name and function of the round stone circle in Clonmacnoise? It can be seen in this photo in the top centre to the left of the round tower on the right: http://cache.virtualtourist.com/1020079-CLONMACNOISE-Clonmacnoise.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.173.117 (talk) 00:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Round stone circle?

message: How did this site come to belong to the Church of Ireland?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of Ireland
Talk:Habenaria yueana

message: The WCSP lists H. yueana and TPL (and Wikidata) lists H. yuana.
I have asked Rafaël Govaerts at Kew for clarification. Gderrin (talk) 20:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Rafaël Govaerts replied on 22/8/2018: There is no conflict. TPL dates from "data supplied on 2012-03-23"; WCSP is live and updated continuously so dates from 2018-08-21; Clearly TPL is outdated and should no longer be used. All updated data are on WCSP or POWO. Gderrin (talk) 09:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yueana or yuana
Talk:King's Leadership Academy Hawthornes

message: Might I suggest to any of the anons editing this page, that getting an ID would help to talk about the article. Also, might I suggest anyone with a digital camera might like to provide a photo. Notwithstanding the comments in the edit history, I didn't see that the anon content added was unreasonable. It sounded quite credible.  Someone complained that it was unsourced, but I think a website sponsored by a lea or CofE school would be considerered respectable enough as a source. Sandpiper 00:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Halfordia kendack

message: According to the Australian Plant Census and Plants of the World Online, the only species in the genus Halfordia is Halfordia kendack. My intention is to swap the two articles, then to create a redirect from Halfordia kendack to Halfordia as required here. Gderrin (talk) 04:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A monotypic taxon
Talk:Ardfert Cathedral

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Trentonian

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes
Talk:Athassel Priory

message: Now in ruins and covered with vegetation, the abbey was used later as a parish church. It has a screen wall down the middle [of the nave] which divided Catholic and Protestant services. The church had two belfries on it. Location is Waterford Road just east of Cahir.
 An Innocent in Ireland, David McFadden, McClelland & Stewart- Toronto, 1995, 
Musicwriter (talk) 19:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athassel Abbey/Priory 

message: There's nothing in the article that says so. It may be a ruin, it may be a national monument and it may be a protected area. None of these mean that it must also be an  archeological site. Where are the archeologists? Where are the trenches? Is there any sign of the Time Team? Propose to delete this category from the article. Laurel Lodged (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who says this is an archeological site? 
Talk:Carrowmore

message: The style of content in this article reads more like a brochure or a speculative essay, rather than an encyclopaedic entry on available facts and figures regarding the site. Perhaps a clean-up is required? --MacTire02 (talk) 11:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content style? 

message: If those who have some point to make about early carbon dates at Carrowmore could please discuss the issue here rather than using the page.
It is clear that controversial dates and theories about early activity at Carrowmore are disputed. This is an encyclopedia, not an archaeological thesis and therefore this information is part of the history of the site and helps people to understand the development of interpretations of the site as well as anomalies that dont fit current theories. Repeated anonymous editing will eventually result in a page protection request.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylanovsky (talk • contribs) 00:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Dates 
Talk:Craggaunowen

message: I'll tag this page as unreferenced. All the info comes from a primary source, which is the (commercial) website of Shannon Heritage given as an external link.
Drow69 (talk) 13:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some work on it today, and added some independent references - not for everything, but it's a start. So I changed the tag to . 88.104.19.233 (talk) 07:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And I removed some double information, leaving the sourced addition of mr. IP and removing the unsourced part. The Banner talk 11:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No refs!
Talk:Clonyn Castle

message: This article seems to be conflating a castle in Delvin with Clonyn Castle. (Sarah777 (talk) 02:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dunsany Castle and Demesne

message: After article improvement, incl. major referencing, time for B-assessment. SeoR (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  B review 

message: Where is the info on these important aspects of this old property? Maybe furniture and china too? I remember lovely Meissen and eastern ornaments on a tour. Thanks. 2A02:8084:2161:4E00:D40B:2161:1BDE:2D0B (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art, Archives, archivist /curator
Talk:Red Bull GmbH

message: Is it only me, or is the marketing/sponsorship to other information ratio a bit high in this article? --Gidoca (talk) 11:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: can't stop addicted to the shindig 134.36.250.203 (talk) 09:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing 

message: The Red Bull energy drink's recipe was licensed from Krating Daeng but the company outfit, Red Bull GmbH, did not originate from Krating Daeng in Thailand. The phrasing is misleading, I removed it. --Takimata (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "originated from Krating Daeng" 

message: No way.  Even if we assume the American (as opposed to British) definition of "billion", i.e., a thousand million, then this means that there were 5.612 X 10∧6 cans consumed in one year, or about 800 per inhabitant of the earth, or an average consumption of over two by each person on earth per day for a year.  I would accept that a figure of 5,612 MILLION cans might represent a year's actual consumption, and even this level is approximately one can for each person in the world over the age of 12 per year, which is still extremely impressive, but realistic.  2600:1004:B144:5853:B05C:9CD8:FD54:75C4 (talk) 23:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty positive it's just a mistake in the use of comma versus dot. How numbers are punctuated are different between languages. Your calculation seems off, don't you mean 5.612 X 10∧12? In any case I think it's supposed to be 5.612 X 10∧9 or more like 0.8 drink per person on earth (I guess population has grown quite some in just these years that have passed now). --Mango från yttre rymden (talk) 11:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  5,612 BILLION cans?? 

message: Tired of paying 3 to 5 dollars and getting a flat drink done this so many times very aggravating 174.235.82.124 (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 134.36.250.203 (talk) 09:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red bull
Talk:Appleton–Hartree equation

message: The section on modes of propagation appears to have the geometries confused. O and X waves propagate perpendicular to B0, while R and L waves are parallel. This is noted in several texts as well as wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.252.194.235 (talk) 00:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modes of Propagation
Talk:Tom Loeffler

message: The information on Tom Loeffler is incomplete. His first wife and the mother of his two sons and daughter was Kathryn Crawford Loeffler.  She is alive and well, living in Texas. Greatbunspr (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Loeffler married twice, first wife and mother of his children is Kathryn Crawford Loeffler.
Talk:Kilcrea Friary

message: I'm just wondering whether anyone thinks this page should be moved to "Kilcrea Abbey", leaving "Kilcrea Friary" as a redirect? According to this list of National Monuments in State Care, an official publication, the official name is "Kilcrea Abbey". It is also called Kilcrea Abbey in this publication by Cork County Council. Xx78900 (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Kilcrea Abbey
Talk:List of archaeological sites in County Cork

message: I cannot see the logic of having townland names on this page. I think they should be removed and placed on a more appropriate page. PeterClarke 15:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of Townlands 
Talk:Phoenician gene

message: Where is the term "Canaanite gene" in the article cite as a ref? I did a google search, but all it brought back were copies of the Wikipedia entry. Tiamat 00:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should probably be renamed. nadav (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The question is to what? I tried to find articles on "Phoenician genetic marker" or some such variation as used int he article cited, but there is no significant literature on this subject. Tiamat 10:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The information with its reference comes from here. A Google search gives some hits for "Canaanite gene" but more for "Phoenician gene". As Phoenicia corresponds with Lebanon, the subject of the reference; I think it would make sense to move it to "Phoenician gene", leaving "Canaanite gene" as a redirect. I'll make the move. Itzse 22:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of the term "Canaanite gene"

message: I've replaced the notability tag with a prod deletion tag given that there are no reliable sources attesting to the existence of a "Phoenician gene". Please provide any sources you have in the next five days. Failing that, the article will be deleted. Tiamuttalk 14:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod tag