Talk:Rúhíyyih Khánum

message: Any objection to moving this page to Rúhíyyih Khanum? I think unless there is a disambiguation issue it's better to use the simplest, most widely recognized name. That's why we have an article named Badi', instead of Mirzá Áqá Buzurg-i-Nishapuri. Cuñado  - Talk 17:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. We'll have to cleanup the authorlinks or add a redirect. Or both. MARussellPESE 18:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I would like to add a small section on her as an author.  Specifically Prescription for Living.  Are there any objections to this before I give it a shot.  Thank you for the feedback.
--Rangercarr 10 April 2006
:Go for it. Baha'i literature could use these titles too. MARussellPESE 14:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoughts

message: *There's nothing in the article describing this appellate, its meaning or how it was given.  I think it's a bit important, as I myself have no idea what it means. JuJube (talk) 13:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a great start for doing some research - do please and share refs.Smkolins (talk) 23:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the meaning, which I got from here. JuJube (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool - thanks! Smkolins (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Amatu'l-Baha"? 

message: An image used in this article, :File:Mary Maxwell (Rúhíyyih Khánum).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Mary Maxwell (Rúhíyyih Khánum).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Rúhíyyih Khanum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207051851/http://www.ca.bahai.org/madame-rabbani to http://www.ca.bahai.org/madame-rabbani
*Added  tag to http://www.bahaibookstore.com/productdetails.cfm?PC=7014
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726012535/http://ebbf.org/ebbforg/neissan_besharati.html to http://ebbf.org/ebbforg/neissan_besharati.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207051851/http://www.ca.bahai.org/madame-rabbani to http://www.ca.bahai.org/madame-rabbani
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Regarding this edit by User:Asad29591 that I reverted... WP:RS, a core content policy, states: "articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects. Generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all, except perhaps in a "see also" to an article about those specific views."
You changed references to Shoghi Effendi from "Guardian" to "first Guardian" to support the view of fewer than 100 people that there were Guardians after him. To a few million Baha'is, and the majority of sources, Shoghi Effendi was the first and last Guardian, and the views of the tiny minority are not excluded from Wikipedia. Per policy, the views are on pages about them, like Baháʼí divisions, Mason Remey, Orthodox Baháʼí Faith, Baháʼís Under the Provisions of the Covenant, Leland Jensen, and others. Including the point of view of a tiny minority across all Baha'i pages on Wikipedia is undue weight. 
But here's what you can do: 1) edit the article using a neutral point of view based on reliable sources to describe Ruhiyyih Khanum's role in the transition from Shoghi Effendi's death to the election of the Universal House of Justice. 2) Add Baha'i divisions to the "see also" section. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 17:13, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Guardian