lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CADAM

message: * Merger of IBM CAD into Altium
* Spin off of PCAD from Altium
* When did Altium become CSC/MicroCADAM?
* When does Micro CADAM become Helix Design System?
* Company name progression was CADM, MICRO CADAM, Altium, Microcadm, then CSC/Microcadm. But when did those changes occur?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.166.188.25 (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing information 

message: The "is/was" in the lead-off sentence seems rather unencyclopedic.  I think one or the other should be chosen, whichever is closer to the current situation, which I believe is CADAM dead but MicroCADAM still alive.  I think "was" would be best, with an explanation elsewhere in the article that the derivative MicroCADAM is till being sold.  --Westwind273 (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: MicroCADAM always had a special popularity in Japan.  It continues to be developed and sold today by IBM Japan.  This article seems to indicate that MicroCADAM has been discontinued everywhere, but it lives on in Japan.  See the following web pages:  
http://www-06.ibm.com/industries/jp/manufacturing/prod/mc/mchelix_en.html
http://www-06.ibm.com/industries/jp/manufacturing/prod/mc/
--Westwind273 (talk) 23:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still being sold in Japan as MICRO CADAM Helix. https://www.fujielectric.co.jp/fsl/solution/helix/index.html Westwind273 (talk) 17:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Japan

message: At the time Lockheed sold CADAM they intended to develop a better system. Either it was called Edge or I forget what it was called. Sam Tomato (talk) 01:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lockheed's successor
Talk:Poly-MVA

message: I have flagged this article for notability.  As far as I can tell, the only references are to sites run by the subject.  The only other reference I can find suggests that Dr. Garnett's main contribution might be to a product called Poly-MVA, which the cited article states:
:Available scientific studies do not support these claims.
numerous times.
D3z (talk) 03:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The pictures need captions! - DavidWBrooks (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are those photos of? 

message: User:Underbelly02, please explain why you are repeatedly removing sourced content, as you did here and here, and the similar edit here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 23:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: When someone is promoting X as effective to treat cancer, WP needs to make it clear that that there is no evidence for that, per WP:PSCI, which is policy.  There are discretionary sanctions in WP with regard to PSCI; I will provide you notice to make sure you are aware of them. Jytdog (talk) 00:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing sourced content 

message: eg in https://polymva.com/about/
?
Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 10:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Helps the body/Mitochondria to produce energy"?
Talk:Genuine Cuban Giants

message: Ok, a user has disputed (twice) the redirect of this article to the Cuban Giants and requested I "prove it", so here it goes.  
First the target article supports this redirection where it states (albeit rather awkwardly, to say the least): "This dismantling and reassembling of the team became routine year after year until 1896, when E.B. Lamar Jr. from Brooklyn bought the team from Bright, renaming them the Cuban X-Giants. Bright responded by putting together an inferior team calling them the “Genuine Cuban Giants” or the “Original Cuban Giants.”"
Second, in Holway's Complete Book, he refers to the Cuban Giants and Genuine Cuban Giants as the same entity.  Unfortunately, he focuses mostly on the players in the text and only mentions the naming difference in passing by using quotes around genuine for the 1901 and 1902 seasons (pp. 39 & 40).  However, in the index, all "Genuine" references fall under the "Cuban Giants" entry (p. 499), while the X-Giants have their own entry (also p. 499).
Third, just to give you some online references that you can view yourself, see these 2 SABR entries. Frank Grant and George Stovey, both important figures in the team's history.  The reference is near the end of each of the 2 articles, just use your search function to search for "genuine" to find the relevant paragraph.  To quote them: Grant bio: "John Bright changed the name of the Cuban Giants in 1896 in response to Lamar’s X-Giants infringement. Bright now used the term “Original” or “Genuine” to refer to his nine." Stovey bio: "In response to LaMar’s encroachment, John Bright changed the name of the Cuban Giants, adding the term “Original” or “Genuine” to refer to his nine."
I can research this further, but I don't have the other sources on-hand so I would have to check them out from the library, or we can ping the wikiproject for further input.
This is not a separate entity, but a restocking of the team that was raided of players by the X-Giants; in order to combat the name theft, Bright started calling his team "Genuine" or "Original" or "Famous" (however the exact dates he started doing this vary from 1896 to about 1905, depending on the source).
I would be interested in knowing what sources you are looking at, especially if they are contradictory.  I hope this is sufficient to continue with the simple redirect.  Rgrds, (Dynamic IP, will change when I log off.) --64.85.217.171 (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I appreciate your taking the time to document why you feel the redirect should be done, and I am fine with it now that you have done so. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 13:43, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Cuban Giants]]
Talk:Potassium phosphate

message: I have removed some discussion of the tissue salt Kali Phos, as this would be better suited on either the tissue salts page itself, or on a page called Kali Phos. Instead, I put Biochemic cell salts as a "see also". If we make a page for Kali Phos, we can put a "other uses" note at the top. --Slashme 14:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kali Phos
Talk:In the Wee Small Hours (Law & Order: Criminal Intent)

message: I eliminated the link to the buff page (probably created blindly?), as the explanations there are not matching, only puzzling.
I hardly can imagine the two detectives are meant to be a Marvel Comics superheroine character from Generation X, or to have anything to do with "smoothing and polishing metals and alloys", or with nudity - what the Pack should this have to do with Sinatra?
Moreover, even free online up-to-date dicionaries like dict.leo.org offer the meanings "fan" and "aficionado".
So, if anyone regards a special explanation necessary and thinks this should be found on the buff page: please, recreate the link only after adding a proper explanation there.
Or, even more interesting, create a Rat Pack slang article, and link the word there (plus, add hints to not only the "buff" disambiguation page ...).
Thanxalot (deeep bow), 80.109.76.27 14:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buff ''page'' shows no matching explanation (yet)
Talk:Tilia tomentosa

message: Aren't all Tilia called "Lindens" in the US?--Wetman 02:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be a dispute about whether the linden flowers are mildly toxic to bees other than honeybees.  Is this backed up by the science or not? The Oregon Dept. of Agriculture https://www.oregon.gov/ODA/shared/Documents/Publications/PesticidesPARC/BeeBrochure.pdf seems to still be publishing the folk wisdom that lindens are toxic.  I found references to a paper by Pawlikowskihttp://www.jas.org.pl/Pollination-activity-of-bees-Apoidea-Apiformes-visiting-the-flowers-of-Tilia-cordata-Mill-and-Tilia-tomentosa-Moench-in-the-urban-environment,0,209.html that seems to state with authority the mannose mechanism.  Pawlikowski cites papers from 1960, 1977, and 1993 to back his assertion that mannose is the mechanism; his paper goes on to study intoxicated bees' behavior.  By contrast, Illies and Wehrnen cite Baal (1993) who fed bees different kinds of nectar and seemingly proved the mannose mechanism incorrect.  Behnke's textbook in 1996https://books.google.com/books?id=-rPtCAAAQBAJ&pg=PA376&lpg=PA376&dq=baal+1993+bees+tilia&source=bl&ots=HWectpoocC&sig=F8D639DPygGeKl04VTKo4Kwi_E4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi97J2jvazRAhUi8IMKHUgHCWkQ6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=baal%201993%20bees%20tilia&f=false cites Baal and others and seems to put the issue to bed.  Is this a big feud in the study of pollinators? Can we make a determination of what the current state of science is?  Jurph (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I can't offer any useful input on the scientific question, but I am in favor of the text being amended to remove the contradiction between "...a good street tree in urban areas, apart from the problems it causes to bees..." and "A widespread belief is that the nectar of this species...can be toxic to some bees. This is incorrect..." Perhaps until the scientific debate is resolved, the two conflicting claims can simply be removed, or they could be isolated to one statement that sums up the controversy? Bricology (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sugars and Toxicity Dispute
Talk:LTM Recordings

message: Someone should add a disambiguation page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.209.67.124 (talk • contribs) 
:Agree, the apparent full name of the company + people start to add disambiguation pages in the see also section. Target is a redirect to here. --Van helsing (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: This article's original author uses the same name as the label's curator indicating a very likely conflict of interest. What this means to us is that the author who created this might not have created this because he thought the subject met Wikipedia's standards but instead to serve his own interests. As a result, we have good reason to double check this subject's notability, neutrality, and so on. The reason why I even noticed this article is that an anonymous editor was spamming other articles with links to this label. This made it clear to me that this label considers Wikipedia to be just another tool for promoting itself - and that's not really Wikipedia's purpose. Rklawton (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest AGF - I've been revising a lot of the LTM/Factory/FBN stuff myself of late and been talking to Mr Nice for info sources - his intentions have been honourable IMO - David Gerard (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Talk:Tilia × europaea

message: Is this really specific to the common lime? Alansplodge (talk) 17:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The section was unreferenced and showed no connection to  the subject so I removed it. --Melburnian (talk) 23:12, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscillant section????
Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/Navigation bar

message: There seems to be a couple problems with the template - the image is missing, and it's now so narrow you can't see the expand icons.  I'll try fixing it, but I'll do it in two stages so either one can be undone if desired.  I'll be replacing that unfortunately beautiful Aztec calendar with a more banal one, :Image:Piedra del Sol.jpg from the commons.  There are others within the category if anyone wants to pick a different one.  WLU 15:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: image and other
Talk:Emily Griffith Technical College

message: Someone please Put the logo back on this article, some one deleted the logo and put there name in that place insted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.92.186.77 (talk) 16:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

message: The following section was removed, because I'm not finding newspapers, student organizations, student unions, etc. I'm putting the instructions here, thought, if someone else is able to find it:
==Student life==  
--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student activities 

message: Similarly, removed the research section
===Research and endowment===
--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research and endowment 
Talk:Wortley, Leeds

message: In the 1880s, Wortley became incorporated into the expanding (then) town of Leeds.
According to Pigot's Directory of 1834, Wortley was already part of the Borough of Leeds by this time.  This is corroborated by White's History, Gazetteer and Directory of the West Riding of Yorkshire of 1837, which confirms that Wortley was within the borough prior to the Municipal Corporations Act 1835—the borough was extended under that act to include Coldcotes, Osmondthorpe, Skelton and Thornes, which had previously been in the parish of Whitkirk.
The borough was created in 1626, and included the whole of the parish, as described in a second charter issued in 1661: Our most dear father Charles the First, lately King of England of blessed memory, by his letters patent under the Great Seal of England, made bearing the date the thirteenth day of July, in the second year of his reign, of his special grace did ordain, grant, and appoint, the town aforesaid to be a free borough of this his real of England, and that under the name of the borough of Leedes aforesaid the whole parish of Leedes should be comprised...
Wortley therefore appears to have been incorporated into the town of Leeds in 1626, not the 1880s.  Skinsmoke (talk) 10:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporation into Leeds 

message: The imagery on this article is outdated for example the Neto has not been there for years,  Phillips should be added to the notable people, the main photo shows a gas container that is no longer there, and there are a number of car showroom garages and that should be included in the article such as Aston Martin. Macro is now Brooker.
The little free libraries in the are should be added to the article as they are an integral part of the community. There are also a number of businesses and offices in the area worthy of note. 62.60.62.114 (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs updates 

message: The article already references that wortley is actually three very distinct areas and communities; New Wortley, Upper Wortley and Lower Wortley.
These areas should be in subsections of the article, with a more expanded overview explain the differences and similarities. Currently the section they are in is very long. 62.60.62.114 (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose to reorganise the article into wortley areas
Talk:HMS Pique (1834)

message: Denver Church in Norfolk, UK has a plaque on the wall.  It reads,
'Sacred to the memory of HORACE MANN.  A mate of His Majesty's ship, Pique. Who, in a gallant attempt to save the life of a perishing shipmate, was drowned in Diamond Harbour, Quebec, on the night of the 24th of August 1853.  This table is erected by the Captain and Officers of His Majesty's ship, Pique.  As a memorial of their esteem for his many virtues, their admiration of his heroic self-devotedness, and of their deep and lasting regret for his untimely fate.  "The righteous shall be in everlasting remembrance"'
86.24.52.90 (talk) 20:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Kandake

message: I have placed several tags on this article.  It is full of POV, OR and unverified, unverifiable or simply incorrect claims. Tameamseo (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm now removing some of the more problematic material.  I will try to find verifiable facts to replace it. Tameamseo (talk) 14:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please point out the faulty text to us? Maikel (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi Maikel.  As a matter of fact, although there are still a number of unverified claims, most of the obviously problematic material is now gone.  I've removed most of the tags which were on top.  Tameamseo (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks Tame.  All those tags did look a tad depressing. Maikel (talk)
Candace G. Martinez, Woodbridge, VA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.15.144.28 (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: She would have been the Kanake at the time of Acts 8, but Wikipedia doesn't have a page for her.  I was hoping to learn more about her.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.234.42 (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amantitere 

message: According  Reisner Amanikhabale is a Qore (King), not a Kandake.--AnnekeBart (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I have removed him. (He has a stela where his mother or wife is shown on a throne, but he was the king). --Enric Naval (talk) 11:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Amanikhabale

message: Török does not think the term means "queen mother". He thinks it means "royal sister". Fluehr-Lobban likewise sees the kandakes as ruling alongside their brothers (when not ruling alone). There is no question that qore also means queen regnant, so maybe the lead did need rewording, but I don't think we should say that the term means "queen mother" only. Srnec (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Succession in Nubia was matrilliear in the sense that the kings sister would provide the next heir, meaning that she automatically was a queen mother as well. See also Angelika Lohwasser, "Die Frau um antiken Sudan", p. 131. LeGabrie (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen mother?
Talk:Ferredoxin-NAD+ reductase

message: The article name is too clunky. Is there a more friendly common name that researchers use when they talk to each other? There are too many names associated with this NAD enzyme complex. Perhaps the list should be truncated to a few that are most commonly used.--Chibibrain (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much jargon
Talk:Mercury(II) reductase

message: In enzymology, a mercury(II) reductase () is an enzyme that catalyzes the chemical reaction
:Hg + NADP+ + H+ \rightleftharpoons Hg2+ + NADPH
206.212.30.207 wrote "(Please explain.  This is not the reaction listed in either of the papers you cite.)" --Rajah (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong reaction?

message: The article is quite ok, but what I would like to see is that it can be more specific, in regards to which organisms use this enzyme.
Right now it reads this:
"Mercury(II) reductase is found in the cytoplasm of many eubacteria[1] in both aerobic and anaerobic environments"
But this does not give us a lot of information. In the long run it would be nice if someone from a microbial ecology
background could extend this a little - just to see which organisms may need this. I assume it's mostly bacteria
but perhaps archaea too? What differences may then be a consequence of this? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of this enzyme by organisms
Talk:Hardwicke's bloodsucker

message: I doubt that the Hardwicke for this species is Thomas Hardwicke because the original publication (present in the article) is: Hardwicke,F.R. & Gray, J.E. 1827.
So we should search for a F.R. Hardwicke. Dont know who it can be.
Regards, Hexasoft (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it seems that 2 different versions of the same reference exist: one with Hardwicke,F.R., and one with Hardwicke, Thomas (with the same title). Guess something is wrong somewhere... Hexasoft (talk) 08:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
File talk:WorldWarI-MilitaryDeaths-EntentePowers-Piechart.svg

message: WorldWarI-MilitaryDeaths-EntentePowers-Piechart.svg‎ 
The page indicates, if I am interperting correctly, that slide was created from table.  But I used the table to check some of the percentages listed and none of my numbers are coming close the pie chart.  I did US, Serbia and UK and they were all of by 2-4% points.
VR
Dear VR, I really recognize your excellent work at the pie chart but ww1 casualties in allied military(As of August 08, 2009) the new % ranks as follows:
Uk and Domains   19.51%
Russia           31.70%
Italy            11.39%
France           24.47%
K. of Serbia      4.81%
Romania           4.37%
US                2.04%
Others            6.04%
Please check this information and update the chart .
Best wishes Miguel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.62.146.245 (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:List of sequels to Looking Backward

message: I'll be adding more works and better descriptions as time goes on.Rabidwolfe 15:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More, more, more

message: Right now, I'm going with the idea that the list should be chronological by year, and the alphabetical by title within a given year.  However, I'm open to other suggestions.Rabidwolfe 16:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll check it out.  It seems like a good candidate.  While I'm here, I think I'll plug my attempt to create a Wiki Project on Utopias and Utopian thinkers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Utopia
Come by and join! Rabidwolfe (talk) 12:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of the List

message: I don't know what the standards are for including shorter works, but "A Journalist's Confession" was an exchange between Dyer D. Lum and Solomon Schindler, in which they took on the personae of Julian West and Dr. Leete. It might be worth inclusion. Libertatia (talk) 00:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll check it out.  It seems like a good candidate.  While I'm here, I think I'll plug my attempt to create a Wiki Project on Utopias and Utopian thinkers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Utopia
Come by and join! Rabidwolfe (talk) 12:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Journalist's Confession, 1890
Talk:King Alfred's Tower

message: Does anyone know why this is categorised in Wiltshire when Images of England clearly lists it in the civil parish of Brewham in South Somerset. I will change this but if anyone knows better or has other sources which argue please discuss here.— Rod talk 19:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somerset v Wiltshire 

message: The Battle of Edington article calls it the Battle of Edington; the King Alfred's Tower article calls the same battle the Battle of Ethandun (User Dzw49 having changed Edington to Ethandun in the King Alfred's Tower article in February, 2009). On the Talk page for King Alfred's Tower I'm suggesting the reference(s) there be changed back to Edington and I'm mentioning it on the Battle of Edington Talk page because there has been much discussion about Edington v Ethandun
Frans Fowler (talk) 03:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been debated on the Battle of Edington article several times. The conclusion was most modern historians now agree that Edington was the site of the battle, based largely on the trail of evidence that we have outlined in the "Location of the battle" section.  The use of the Old English name Ethandun (and variations), is still in use on monuments and works of fiction, so there should still be a reference to it. eg: Battle of Edington previously known as Ethandun, according to MoS Ethandun should be italicised as it is not an English word.Wilfridselsey (talk) 10:18, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Change: Ethandun to Edington