lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seven Days (TV series)

message: Was the word "backstep" invented by the writers of the TV series. If so why did they see the need to make up words?Royalcourtier (talk) 08:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: ... because it's catchy? They're screenwriters; the whole premise of the series is made up. Look no further than some of the technical terminology behind any Star Trek episode. ー「宜しく 」 クロノ  カム  07:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backstep 

message: Added info on Awards, please see DIFF. 
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 22:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards 

message: "[H]e's unable to steer the needles as well as Frank" -- What does this mean? 216.255.171.122 (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needles? 

message: Spolier alert. Episodes 6 and 7 of the first season are two parts of the "Doppleganger" story. An "improvement" on the time sphere causes Frank to be split into two Franks. The original and an increasingly evil one, who shoots the original Frank in the back, killing him. That Frank uses the time sphere and again there is a split, with the extra Frank this time being good. They fight and the evil Frank goes over a cliff and dies, leaving a copy of a copy as the only Frank now.(90.164.50.80 (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the original Frank

message: Hi. Should she really be in the main characters list, participating in one episode only? I'm going to remove her a week from today, if I'll not find some reljable source that she should be there. IKhitron (talk) 02:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrie Quigley
Talk:Sumer

message: On source # 24 there is a sentence which intends to be applied to the Sumerians, but it seems to be a weak argument as the study itself states: "Ancient DNA methodology was applied to analyse sequences extracted from freshly unearthed remains (teeth) of 4 individuals deeply deposited in slightly alkaline soil of the Tell Ashara (ancient Terqa) and Tell Masaikh (ancient Kar-Assurnasirpal) Syrian archaeological sites, both in the middle Euphrates valley. Dated to the period between 2.5 Kyrs BC and 0.5 Kyrs AD" . So it could be applied for any cultural group in that region.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.196.131.220 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, there is no genetic study regarding the people you call "Sumerians". The silence is deafening.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk) 05:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree. Statement removed from article. Zoeperkoe (talk) 19:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak proof of Connection with Indus Valley 

message: "The Akkadians, the East Semitic-speaking people who later conquered the Sumerian city-states, gave Sumer its main historical name..." No, they didn't. It was 'stuck upon them' by professor J. Oppert. 
Also "... the phonological development of the term šumerû is uncertain ..." Why is this discussed here? It's an Akkad word and as is it belongs there. They didn't call themselves 'sumer' either. Discuss the etymology of THEIR name.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk • contribs) 05:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The 'cradle of civilization' term was invented by prof. S. Kramer when he said "Sumer, the cradle of civilization". I.e. not a generic term for Egypt and others in the middle east - as it is being distorted nowadays.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk • contribs) 05:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Cradle of civilization
Talk:Noosphere

message: Redirection to the article "noosphere", the name "noogenesis", which is not a synonym for the term represented by the name of redirection, and the article does not fully describe this term as part of a more general article. An article about "noogenesis", the concept, the history of its appearance, scientific research and development in modern times deserves, in my opinion, an independent existence. It may be advisable to disconnect "noogenesis" from redirection, designate an independent article "noogenesis" for further editing. DoubleNoo (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion of this is happening at Talk:Noogenesis. jps (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semantically incorrect redirection 

message: The redirect Noogenesis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Noogenesis]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Victor Gollancz

message: Anyone know how he said his name? OED lists Victor Gollancz as pronounced  , I watched a contemporary English newsreel which preferred  . I'm inclined to go with Oxford on this one but I wonder if anyone knows different -moogsi(blah) 23:55, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to pronounce (Victor) Gollancz 

message: You should add at least one paragraph about Victor Gollancz’s total support and propaganda for Stalin using LBC 108.194.235.71 (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victor Gollancz’s support of Stalin and his killings
Talk:Moggy

message: I tend to regard this as peculiarly Australian, though I know that it comes from a pet name for "Margaret".  I'm familiar with the term because of the Eric Bogle song He's Nobody's Moggy Now. Eclecticology
Eric Bogle is of UK origin. He came to Australia as an adult (he even wrote a song about it :)) I figured that the term was English/Australian. Seriously, what do they call common-or-garden domestic cats in other countries? We should add it. KJ
:The only term I've ever heard (other than roundabout descriptions like ordinary cat, regular cat, non-purebred cat, etc.) in Canada is moggy. - Montréalais
::In America, it's just a plain ol' mixed-breed cat. Maybe I'll try to get people to start using the word "moggy" :) Lachatdelarue (talk)
I'm from Australia, and 'Moggy' was definately slang for 'cat' whilst growing up... and the schoolyard explanation of the word is that it was from the schoolyard joke: 'How do you spell cat?' ... "M-o-g" (write it on paper each letter above the other. M = ears, o = head, g = body + tail). If cat is spelt m-o-g, it's only natural to pronounce it as 'mog' too :) Has anyone else heard this origin? If so, it should go into the article proper... --Nemo 01:19, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a back-formation. I've never come across this in Britain, although 'moggy' is the common colloquial term for a cat. John G Walker 14:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dalai Lama

message: It is cute to mention (in the bio capsule on the right) the beginning of the current Dalai Lama's tenure as January 22, 1940.
But surely Wikipedia is capable of listing his birthdate near the beginning of the article!
There is every reason to do this, and no reason not to do it. 2601:200:C000:1A0:20BE:A512:2183:1640 (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: Just watched Martin Scorsese's movie "Kundun" that portrays the life of the 14th Dalai Lama.   If would be nice to mention this in yhe article. 68.47.47.224 (talk) 01:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not how it works. Andy murrey (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kundun movie
Talk:Cardiac arrest

message: Great job editing this page and providing important information to the public. Here are my comments regarding your work and the plan you made initially!
General/Intro:
* Great edits. You added appropriate links to other articles. You also did a great job making this section concise and easy to understand.
Signs/Symptoms:
* You clarified the bystanders role if they suspect a cardiac arrest.
* You wrote that you would provide a list of common vs less common presentations. I see there is a list of nonspecific symptoms (worsening chest pain, fatigue, etc.) but I’m not sure if you meant to expand on the list.
Risk Factors:
* Great reference added with the 2021 meta-analysis.
Causes/Mechanisms:
* great addition of cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies
** really good elaboration on the non-cardiac etiologies such as pulmonary embolus, diabetes, and medications.
* nice description of how arrhythmias cause sudden cardiac arrest
Diagnosis:
* Added more information on POCUS’ role on diagnosis
* Mentioned you wanted to expand the discussion of shockable vs non-shockable rhythms but not sure if there was more you wanted to add.
Management:
* Great additions to the management section.
* Strong reference on the dispatcher-assisted CPR study
* Great explanation of defibrillation, medications
Prognosis:
* good job providing updated information regarding hypoxic ischemic brain injury.
Strong Work! Ji119302 (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the review! I appreciate your comments. I restructured the medication section and added additional information about amiodarone, lidocaine, atropine, magnesium, bicarbonate, and calcium, as well as provided additional discussion regarding special conditions (dialysis patients and TCA overdose). I also added information to better define the shockable rhythms and provided additional references to support these changes.  TRR2727 (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Jackie (given name)

message: There's only one Jackie, of course: for fans of The Simpletons, it clearly means cartoon character Jackie Bouvier. -- Mr. Play D'Oh
No, you moron, the one and only Jackie is the First Lady of Camelot, Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy! -- Millard Fitzhugh Carrutthers IV
As far as I remember on the telly, Marge's mother is referred to as Mrs Bouvier or Jacqueline Bouvier, never Jackie. Anyway, there's the Brel song. -- Tarquin
: As Ed pointed out in his own "special" way, this page does make sense for the Simpsons character, but not for JBK. Jackie may be a useful disambiguation page if there were a number of queens called Jackie I of Czechoslovachina or Jackie MMII of Farawayistan. But not for people that do have a proper surname... And disambiguation shouldn't be used for differently spelled names really, although I suppose this does no real harm. Jeronimo
I added an entry that was later removed due to it not being linked to an article, yet there are other entries on the page that are not linked and yet remain...why? --Bwd234 22:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a Google search on the new entry you added, and I thought that the name was already on the list so I removed it. I left the current redlinks because they seemed like reasonable new entries. Was your entry a new notable person that will (someday) need a separate article? - grubber 01:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I was going to add an article as soon as I got more information on this person.  This person is gaining fame on the internet for her videos that appear on YouTube and other sites.  I also have information that she will be appearing on VH1's Web Junk 20, air date unconfirmed so far.  After the show airs I will add an article with a link to it on here. --Bwd234 11:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok. I apologize for the edit then. One of the things I do on WP is watch 300 pages or so and make sure that they don't get vandalized, and I tend to scrutinize edits by anonymous people (IP addresses) and redlinked users (like yourself currently) more actively than other editors, simply because this group is more likely to do drive-by edits and make edits that are not compatible with WP policy. If you're going to take a larger part in WP in the future, I'd suggest adding some info about yourself on your userpage. Welcome to WP! :) - grubber 15:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks :) --Bwd234 21:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The first line says that it is a female name, but numerous examples that follow are male. 165.124.70.189 22:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A female name?
Talk:Temple Mount Faithful

message: I removed some of the more blatant POV but this article still needs the attention of an expert to remove the rest.71.237.210.137 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 09:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure why you (Normandy Journal) reverted the last set of changes.  They clearly were not vandalism.  At the moment the article reads like propaganda.  The various claims are not supported by 3rd party sources.  It needs drastic edits.  I have restored the POV tag and added a couple more.  Also please point to a wikipedia policy that supports the use of "G-d", without such a policy then God should be used  --Snowded TALK  11:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any response I propose to radically prune this article removing all material which is not supported by citation  --Snowded TALK  08:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the edit waring editor (see below) I have made the reductions now as the material is appallingly POV --Snowded TALK  08:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

text: WIkipedia works from third party sources, its not here just to replicate web sites.  --Snowded TALK  16:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

text: You need to read up on the way WIkipedia works.  Without a third party reliable source its difficult to establish anything.  Also the previous version read like a propaganda piece; making factual statements without authority.   To be honest it may  better just to delete the article --Snowded TALK  22:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a lot of work 

message: That has no sources.  That is a racist pamphlet.  I will take a rain check on your suggestion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneralChoomin (talk • contribs) 08:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hehe you want to say that I am vandalizing an article 

message: The phrase "Temple Mount Faithful" gets over 100 hits at Google Scholar, including academic articles and reliable books.  It gets over 1000 hits in the Google News Archive, including many prominent news sources. And that's only in English. Therefore, the suggestion that no reliable third-party sources are likely to be found is incorrect and there is no case for speedy deletion. Listing it on a few project pages might attract someone willing to work on it.  Further attempts to delete should go through WP:AFD. Zerotalk 08:11, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I left it for several weeks to see if anyone would take it up.  Happy to leave it for a few more.  --Snowded TALK  08:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Delete request 

message: The fairly indisputable common name here is "Temple Mount Faithful", and the page has been moved there accordingly. See Ngrams; also 19,000 hits for TMF to 2,000 hits for the full name, and 393 scholar hits for TMF to hits for the full name, without even mentioning source quality and the prevalent usage by key institutions, such as the UN, Israeli Supreme Court, etc. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to [[WP:COMMONNAME]]
Talk:International Monetary Fund

message: So some people believe that the criticisms section is non-neutral I disagree, there is no discussion of the talk so I would like people to state what they think. Thanks. Vallee01 (talk) 05:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  On criticisms  

message: There should be a chart by continent on the amount of debt owned by the IMF in each country. CaribDigita (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amount of debt owned by each country? 

message: Include in the article?
In December 2023 the International Monetary Fund warned that the global economy risked losing up to $7 trillion in the event of a new Cold War.Cold War II? Preserving Economic Cooperation Amid Geoeconomic Fragmentation. International Monetary Fund.Partington, Richard.  World economy on brink of ‘cold war two’, IMF official warns. (December 23, 2023).  The Guardian.IMF's Gopinath says economic fragmentation could cut global GDP by 7%. (December 11, 2023). 
 Reuters.Hogg, Ryan.  ‘Cold War II’ might be coming, IMF deputy says, and it could wipe trillions of dollars from the global economy. (December 12, 2023).  Forbes.
Ikipedia2 (talk) 03:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: global economy risked losing up to $7 trillion in the event of a new Cold War
Talk:Jews for Jesus

message: The large changes, dropping lots of accepted information and adding a lot of propaganda need to be discussed on the talk page. Most of this article is not acceptable as is at the moment. The point of this article should not be as a propaganda piece for Jews for Jesus, and you can not leave out criticisms. Many of the changes are to things that have been discussed over many years to come to a consensus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laella (talk • contribs) 18:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes - most not good 

message: Scanning through the page, I was surprised at the bias against this organization. I know it is a controversial topic, but this clearly violates Wikipedia’s neutrality standards. There should be a balance of information. Because of that, I’ve added a couple relevant quotes to the article to help restore some of that balance. I have also removed/edited a couple statements that have logical fallacies, which I will explain in detail below:
* Removing The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America from the list of those criticizing evangelism of Jews: The referenced doctrine doesn’t actually say the church criticizes Jewish evangelism. It only says to be aware that most Jews believe Messianic Jews and Jews for Jesus have “forsaken Judaism, and consider efforts to maintain otherwise to be deceptive,” which is not them criticizing Jewish evangelism. I did some further research and couldn’t find any other statement from them criticizing the evangelism of Jews.
 
* Removing Rabbi Irving Greenberg’s quote on Jews for Jesus and supersessionism: The quote of Rabbi Irving Greenberg accusing Jews for Jesus of teaching Christian supersessionism contains major factual errors. In reality, Messianic Judaism has publicly denounced the idea of supersessionism, and Jews for Jesus has as well. I found several sources that confirm this, which I can list if need be. Since his statement mostly contains false information, it should be removed.
If anyone disagrees with any of the changes I made, before undoing my changes, please respond to me on the talk page and let’s discuss this. I intend to be very responsive on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AEditing3 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No balance of information on this page 

message: @Intercalate I removed the information about the Better Business Bureau because it included a large chunk of what is a standard BBB message when a charity does not interact with it.   A lot of churches do not seek BBB approval.  They might use a different group like Candid (organization) (aka GuideStar) or Charity Navigator.  Jews for Jesus might well be problematic as far as finances; however, Wikipedia needs a reliable source stating this.  Note the BBB also states in a section not quoted: "It[this report] is not intended to recommend or deprecate".  Is there a reason you want to include this in the entry? Erp (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Business Bureau
Talk:Human overpopulation

message: I would like to debate the use of this word 'hypothetical' in the first line. ~ Basvossen (talk) 02:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The fact that it is a debate needs to be made more clear. too_much curiosity (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Hypothetical' 

message: I think the graph is highly misleading. It was taken from a paper describing how textbooks fail to mention not having children as a way to reduce carbon footprint. The "56.8 tonnes", however, comes from the impact of all descendants averaged over the years in person's lifetime, and assumes that each descendant has the the same environmental impact as humans in wealthy countries in 2005. To me, this is obviously misleading so I removed it. If you disagree, please revert my edit and comment below. too_much curiosity (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed misleading graph -- 58.6 tonnes of Co2 per year per child 

message: This section has grammatical errors and it doesn't really make sense. It seems to contradict itself, and the source material it cites doesn't really make the claims mentioned in the second paragraph. 198.98.119.78 (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix the grammatical errors in the second paragraph. I read the source and agree that it doesn't make the claims mentioned in that paragraph. The last sentence of that paragraph also seems to be talking about a different subject. I think that whole paragraph should be either rewritten to match the source or removed.   23impartial (talk) 04:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemics and pandemics section is poorly written
Talk:House Un-American Activities Committee

message: Is Harry A. Jung, an anti-Semite who served as an "investigator" for the Dies Committee, mentioned in this article, or anywhere on Wikipedia? If not, shouldn't he be? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have good sources that describe Jung? If so, this can be included. Freelance-frank (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Harry A. Jung
Talk:Jacques Cousteau

message: I think that the disambiguation should be made a seperate page, Currently I think its there becuase "Cousteau" links to this page. What are your thoughts on this. Also does anyone have an acceptable picture of him? I do have books with his picture but they are copyrighted works making them of no use for Wikipedia. --Silver86 22:47, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The disambiguation 

message: I've moved this back to Jacques Cousteau, and fixed the double-redirects, as this is how he is most commonly known in English, per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names).--Pharos 04:14, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page renamed
Talk:Gun control

message: I recently created Draft:Sandy Hook Promise, a gun control nonprofit. Any help finding sources would be appreciated! Thriley (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Sandy Hook Promise]] 

message: Adding information regarding public health dimension of gun legislation. Bcapdevi (talk) 22:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit 

message: — Assignment last updated by Stevenmadden7 (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LLIB 1115 - Intro to Information Research

message: — Assignment last updated by Gracezillaa (talk) 21:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Equitable Futures - Internet Cultures and Open Access
Talk:CuteFTP

message: Can anyone explain what units CuteFTP uses for "Speed" - I see "kbs" and "mbs" in the CuteFTP 8 "Queue Window" for example, but these are not valid units.  "kbs" suggests "kilo-byte seconds" or "kilo-bit seconds" ... but both are nonsense units (should be either kbps or kb/s).  Similarly, "mbs" suggests "milli-byte seconds" or "milli-bit seconds" which is doubly nonsense - both because it is a nonsense unit and also because (even if they mean mbps or mb/s) it is a ridiculously small unit.  I realize that they probably mean "Mega" rather than "milli" - but then they should use capital "M".
"Baud" used to be used universally for data transmission rates, and that is, at least, unambiguous.
This is all very sloppy and, of course, does not reflect well on GlobalSCAPE.
See Data rate units, also see:
* Bit rate
* SI prefix
* Binary prefix
* List of device bandwidths  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.96.152 (talk) 03:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mangled Units of Transmission Speed