lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lauxaniidae

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Homoneura sp02.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 28, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-03-28. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Homoneura sp02.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Thomas Sadleir

message: There was no such office as 'Deputy King of Arms'. The junior officers were the Dublin Herald, the Cork Herald and the Athlone Pursuivant - see recently created page. I have added his name to the list of Athlone Pursuivants but if someone knows better please amend. Also, the text of this article should be updated. PeterClarke 11:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Deputy King of Arms"
Talk:Nuraghe

message: I've heard many alternate theories about the origin and purpose of the nuraghes, some more fantastic, some less, like survivors from atlantis built them? Maybe it would be prudent to include them for the sake of comprehensiveness, in case other researches agree that they are mention-worthy Capricornis (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They may have been granaries?  -- œ™ 21:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate theories?
Talk:Naming firm

message: This is pointless fluff.  Looks like a ploy by Igor or Tungsten to drive traffic to their sites.  
Delete!
71.163.60.112 10:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: The notability of the subject is currently unclear, since no sources are cited. By the notability criteria, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press articles or books, for example. I am referring here to sources that would cover the concept of naming firms, not only directory listings of such firms. 
If sources cannot be found, or can be found only partially, one might also consider to merge this article into Product naming, as far as it is verifiable.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Accident analysis

message: I started creating the Accident investigation article, then ran across this one. Both need lots of work. I'm not sure which title is best, or if there are other alternatives. Is "accident analysis" a technical term, or perhaps the more common British usage? Dhaluza 17:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge. Accident analysis is better term I think. -- Magioladitis 06:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I see the dilemma.  As a student of Human Resources Management dealing with OH&S programs as well, I came to this site and searched for Accident investigation.  Under this title I expected to find a lot more information, and a category that also encompassed areas of, procedures, benefits, and "analysis".
As part of the investigation, analysis is an essential part, I beleive that anyone needing this information, personally, will want to understand how to investigate accidents, in this category I think we should also address the analysis that individuals will use.  My answer: "Accident Investigation", the benefits, highlights, important need to understand information, and where information can be found for "accident analysis".
--WikdwitchNof7 15:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis vs. Investigation 

message: This section basically has nothing in it right now. I tried to clean it up, but it's still pretty empty. I don't have access to the book, so I can't quote or describe the models list referred to here. It might be better to just take this section out and put Enhancing Occupational Safety and Health in a "Further reading" section unless  can add the info.SaAnKe (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Models" section 

message: — Assignment last updated by UCIHGrad18 (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Environmental Pollution and System Safety Mgmt- Student Projects
Talk:454 BC

message: How was it determined that this entry should go into this particular year?? 
According to Wikipedia, Astyages, the great King of Persia, ruled between 585 BC and 550 BC.  The entry on the Book of Esther in Wikipedia says that she was the queen-consort of either Xerxes I (ruled 486 BC - 465 BC) or possibly Artaxerxes II (ruled 405 BC - 359 BC).  So using Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that this event occurred in 454 BC.  Clarification of the basis for the year timing of this entry (not the entry itself) would be appreciated.   --Chaleyer61 10:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. I only reformulated the text and fixed minor details, but now that you mention this, I also start to wonder. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 00:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  I will wait for a response from Malone before seeking to amend the entry. --Chaleyer61 03:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

text: How is anything in Esther relevant to dating the Decree?  And Wikipedia is often wrong, why have these talk page discussions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.176.92 (talk) 07:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astyages and Esther - historical accuracy of using the year 454 BC for this event. 

message: An Anonymous editor (24.119.213.30) added information only accepted by Jehovah's Witnesses (i.e. the decree to rebuild Jerusalem being in 454 BC instead of 445/4). I removed it since this is incorrect. If we ought to keep it, perhaps we ought to add that it is the date according to Jehovah's Witnesses. In the case that we do this, I have only commented out (wrapping the text in ) the questionable text. AChildOfGod (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Anonymous Edit
Talk:Miller (moth)

message: Mills / miller moths are reported in North America ( https://www.9news.com/article/life/style/colorado-guide/miller-moths/73-3e0dceeb-1eae-424a-8b67-40ef4129005e; https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/insects/miller-moths-5-597/).  These are not the same animals. Kdammers (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In North America
Talk:Mycetophilidae

message: This article was tagged as a suspected copyright infringement on January 14, 2009. The suspected source of the material was . This material has been removed, as it is the stated intent of the contributor of the material to revise it to separate it from that source. Contributors are welcome to restore the information, but it should not infringe on the copyright of that source by closely reproducing language or structure, unless the external site is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see our copyright FAQ: Can I add something to Wikipedia that I got from somewhere else?.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright concern removed 
Talk:Australian Idol season 4

message: --Verity Lee (talk) 08:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Please merge any relevant content from [ Ricky Muscat] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Muscat.   (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.)  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 08:56Z
:I just did it. RaNdOm26 04:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Ricky Muscat]] 

message: Please merge any relevant content from [ Lisa Mitchell] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Mitchell.   (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.)  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 08:57Z
:Did that too. RaNdOm26 04:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Lisa Mitchell]] 

message: Please merge any relevant content from [ Klancie Keough] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klancie Keough.   (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.)  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 09:33Z
:And this one too. RaNdOm26 04:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Klancie Keough]] 
Talk:Risley (circus act)

message: In the german Wikipedia is an Arikle named "Ikarier". 
Does Risely and Ikarier really mean the same kind of circus skill ?
Where does the Name "Risely" come from ?  greetings RalfDA  --192.109.50.10 10:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello Together !
Talk:The Zionist Protocols

message: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are known to be an anti-Semitic fraud.  This page should be DELETED or LABELED AS CONTAINING PURELY FICTIONAL MATERIAL AND GIVEN TO SHOW WHAT THE FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT CONTAINS. I am inserting an IMMEDIATE EDIT explaining the origins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brooksindy (talk • contribs) 
:Whether it is a fraud or not is beside the point, it is a historical document and most definately should be part of wikipedia. I suggest the following improvements. Each protocol should have its own page, with a discussion on whether this protocol has borne fruitation. They should also be categorized, along with historical comments such as henry fords comments.
: I also suggest you keep a copy of it somewhere just in case it is deleted.81.178.204.130 11:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jack Mills

message: Who is Charmian Bigg?  The name comes up in the "Death" section without a single word of explanation as to who this is.  People who write/edit articles need to take a moment and read the article from top to bottom assuming no prior knowledge of the subject.  You shouldn't just mention some name without explanation of who they are and what their connection is.  Basic rules of writing still apply, even here!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.244.51.197 (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Charmian Biggs is Ronnie Biggs' ex-wife. Jim Michael (talk) 20:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charmian Bigg 

message: One of the gang claimed that Mills attacked them. This is very hard to believe.
One unarmed man will not normally attack a large group of armed men.
Based on what assertion?
A father defending his home, or his family? 
A Royal Protection Officer protecting the Queen?
Perhaps Mills thought if he could repel them for a very short while, they could have put the train in motion again, and remove the attackers ability to board the train. 
There are plenty of examples of people attacking others despite the odds, and you can virtually guarantee this is for good reason every time.
It does seem odd that one of the gang would claim this, after all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.120.222.100 (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim 

message: Shouldn't "and" read "from", "because of", "due to" or something like that? Brain damage is an effect, whereas blows to the head are a cause - they shouldn't be equated by linking them with "and".213.127.210.95 (talk) 14:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jack Mills had severe brain damage and blows to the head" 

message: Can somebody please add this to the main text as appropriate? - not only a plaque at Crewe station in memorial to both men but Train Operating Company DB Schenker have named a locomotive after Driver Jack Mills - https://www.crewechronicle.co.uk/news/crewe-south-cheshire-news/great-train-robbery-victims-jack-8215499 Andywebby (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack Mills and David Whitby honoured with Plaque at Crewe station 

message: This page ahould be moved to Jack Mills (train driver) and Jack Mills (disambiguation) should be moved here to Jack Mills. I tried to do it but existing redirects blocked me. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Robert Siodmak

message: One of the brothers was commited suicide and nothing is known about him.
Verner was the third brother, born in 1910, imigrated to Israel in 1935. I am his grandson.
Verner, called "Zeev" here in Israel, was one of the establishers of "Maoz Haim" Kibutz in the north.
He leaved thre for several years and moved to Raanana. He had 4 childrens, Ziva, Vered (died in 1971), Shlomit, David, all leaving in Isreal.
Verner "Zeev", died in 1987 in his home at Raanana. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.219.167.248 (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert had 2 more brothers, should be noted
Talk:Fortifications of Portsmouth

message: Portsea lines can mean either hilsea lines or portsmouth lines .©Geni 20:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: note to self

message: Hilsea Lines and Portsbridge gives 1757 for first hilsea lines Fortifications in Old Portsmouth-a guide gives 1747.©Geni 04:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clashing dates

message: mentions a Windmill Fortress near Portsmouth and a bulwark called "sportsmaking" although less clear where that actually is.©Geni 03:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: one off mentions

message: http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11146797853/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11296177903/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11296703036/
©Geni (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: possible pics 19th century stuff
Talk:Paysandisia archon

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Paysandisia archon MHNT Dos Vif Fronton.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 31, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-03-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Paysandisia archon MHNT Dos Vif Fronton.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Template talk:Football in Taiwan

message: Hmm...the template can be reorganized as new topics about Taiwanese soccer are being created. Like...split the "Regional associations" section into a new template after more topics are being made about them, etc. -- Asdf1248 11:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like this template is limited to the groups and associations of football in Taiwan. Chongkian (talk) 04:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organization
Talk:Fruit fool

message: Why is the dish called a "fool"? Drutt 20:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this may be the explanation: "Fools most likely get their name from the French word foule, meaning “crushed or pressed.”" Drutt 20:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The opinion that foole derives from "fouler" is widespread (although that isn't a proof of correctness) and given by several sources. This opinion is not shared by OED, but on the other hand - I've also seen references to the OED article with comments that the OED entry is written they way it is because it doesn't consider Gooseberry fool to contain crushed, stewed fruit originally, which it certainly does by 1658 (see reference in article), and that that is a much later variation. --Shieldfire (talk) 10:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: The description (puréed fruit mixed into custard) doesn't match the picture (giant whole raspberry resting on dish of whipped cream). A net search shows the big whole berries to be an essential feature in most images. The two should match - description and pic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.124.187 (talk) 03:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's more of a garnish than the thing itself, -most pictures of pavlova will have kiwifruit or something on them, but they're not the pavlova.219.88.68.195 (talk) 22:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 
Talk:Dumb Luck (novel)

message: Banned in Vietnam until 1986? Really? Whoa whoa whoa! I don't know that! Can I have some references here?
Oh, ps: Dumb luck is being taught in Literature in High school program in Vietnam Kreativevn (talk) 15:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banning? 
Talk:Colonia

message: Tagging this for cleanup. My comment from Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Colonia: I would also have move the dictionary-like definition down (treating it like a synonym according to WP:MOSDAB, with a wiktionarypar link at the top to handle it (if wiktionary has an entry for it).  And the examples of the definition, assuming the linked articles don't themselves mention "colonia", should be deleted -- possibly even the dictionary definition itself, since the linked term there doesn't mention colonia either.  The disambiguation pages needn't have information on the etymology of terms, IMO, because WP's not a dictionary. I don't understand why colonias is a separate article, though, and the colonia page has other problems (pipe links, multiple links). -- JHunterJ 11:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:System Reference Document

message: As I am going about WP I am seing what appears to be that people are trying to completely add the entire contents of the SRD as articles. Are these articles needed on Wikipedia? Isn't the link to the official site containing the articles enough rather than the hundreds of stubs reproducing them? I don't exactly know how, or think I should, list them all for AfD, but I am understanding WP:NOT to say that they shouldn't belong. Some content may be usefull to describe the game, but does everything need to be reproduced on Wikipedia? shadzar|Talk|contribs 11:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  related articles. 

message: Someone should look into adding something about how the SRD differs between the OGL versions and the 4th edition GSL. shadzar-talk 04:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th edition 

message: On the first section, Formats, there's a link to References. however, the References section was removed some time ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.167.19.220 (talk) 01:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References not available 

message: Shouldn't this wiki reflect the new v5.1 SRD?
Link:
http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/systems-reference-document-srd  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.93.250.144 (talk) 08:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  SRD v5.1
Talk:Poanes

message: ----
So the Poanes have been split into Poanes and Lon? Or renamed to Lon? https://mczbase.mcz.harvard.edu/guid/MCZ:Ent:152194 Mike (talk) 17:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it has been split with all of the species being moved to Lon except for Aaron's Skipper (Poanes aaroni), Mulberry Wing (Poanes massasoit), Broad-winged Skipper (Poanes viator), and Yehl Skipper (Poanes yehl). Nosferattus (talk) 20:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Laothoe populi

message: The list of synonyms in the info box is enormous and disrupts the flow of the article. Unless anyone objects, I will make this a three-column section in the body of the article, using 
. Tony Holkham (Talk) 10:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox (synonyms) 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Poplar hawk-moth (Laothoe populi) late instar larva.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 3, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-06-03. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 14:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:SUSTAIN (military)

message: # It's not orbital, it's suborbital.  The difference is an order of magnitude for speed, and several for energy. (Mach 3 vs. Mach 20)
# The vehicle is not intended to extract them.  Extraction is very specifically left to other means.
I've made the changes to address this. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 09:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: Why is there a link to the Warhammer 40k space marines in this article?  It is unrelated, and if we are going to add fantasy stories as well, Starship Troopers imo would be a more apt fit as they are humans using the similar technology, but again, that is still personal opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocrates (talk • contribs) 02:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Marines 

message: Just about every link is broken except for the "Why We Must Sustain..." one and the February 2006 article from The Space Review.
173.52.242.194 (talk) 02:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Links 
Talk:Scatopsidae

message: The name might have an interesting etymology. Scatops (Scat- + ops) means literally "looks like shit". But it turns out that the genus on which the name is based is actually Scatopse (meaning, with some poetic license, "coming to the dung in the evening") which was fairly often written Scatops in what may be one of the more Freudian lapsi of zoological nomenclature... apparently the erroneous version was the one the family's describer knew of. One wonders what this guy thought... Dysmorodrepanis 19:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Setaceous Hebrew character

message: Some discussion about how this species acquired its extremely odd name would be appreciated. -Toptomcat 01:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Setaceous means "hairy" (although I've never really noticed either adult or larva being particularly hairy) and the Hebrew character bit refers to the pattern on the wing resembling a Hebrew letter (I reckon this is a bit tenuous too). It's a great name though Richard Barlow 13:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

text: PS, the setaceous bit serves mainly to distinguish the species from the similarly marked but not particularly closely related Hebrew Character. Richard Barlow 13:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Silver-ground carpet

message: The two main problems are that the page relies entirely upon a single authority, and that it appears the entire entry from Prout has been quoted (so looking like an intellectual-property violation).
The quote will definitely have to be substantially reduced if only for length. But it appears that this is a cut-and-paste from a table of some sort, and therefore rather poor prose.  As well, technical terminology that is unexplained ("fuscous-margined" "discocellular") is beyond the needs of most Wikipedia users. Finally, either before or after the Prout passage the article text ought to give the reader some indication as why specifically this block of text is here presented.Weeb Dingle (talk) 07:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  overquote, overreliance
Talk:Six-spot burnet

message: I've pruned and reinstated the gallery, after it was removed by another editor.
I don't work on many entomology pages, but on the botany and mineral-species pages I frequent, a gallery can be both useful and encyclopedic -- so long as it doesn't get overgrown, as this one had. This page was weaker without a gallery, I think. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The critical factor is whether the images are illustrating anything. An uncurated collection of images is not particularly useful. I have replaced it with a box displaying the life cycle, which ties in to the text and clearly illustrates the different stages, in order (although there are no pictures of the egg available, unfortunately). --Stemonitis (talk) 07:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work -- thanks. As you say, better-integrated now. Best, Pete Tillman (talk) 05:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery pruned and reinstated
Talk:Munich-Feldmoching station

message: This page refers to the Feldmoching "quarter" in "the north-west of Munich." However, the Munich page makes no mention of Feldmoching. Is it actually a quarter, or borough, neighborhood, or other municipal division? -- Deborahjay (talk) 07:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at Boroughs of Munich (which is linked in Munich#Subdivisions, I'm not sure what would be the correct termin though. --FloSch (talk) 21:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feldmoching "quarter"