Portal talk:Western Sahara/Western Sahara topics

message: Western Sahara is a territory disputed between Morocco and Polisario, each side has its own arguments which they think suffiscient, the UN is trying now to resolve the problem through a referundum. First of all, the problem is about neutrality of WP, the flag shown in this section is the flag used by one party of the conflict (polisario) and refused by the other (Morocco) and not recognized by the UN (the mediator in this conflict). There was an edit conflict about the infobox of Western Sahara page between me in one side and you and Arre in the other, a survey was necessary and the results are here and here. You see that the "no flags" option seems to be the least controversial solution, the "two flags" option was the second choice, displaying only one flag was the worst solution. Let's comply with WP principles of neutrality. You have to accept other side's opinions, stop your blind war edit. Daryou 18:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that in that case a no flags situation will be relevant. Daryou 23:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, many people call it like this and many governments recognize the SADR, that's true, However the SADR isn't recognized by the UN and 147 states. The territory is disputed and the conflict is under UN mediation, untill the dispute is resolved, WP should be neutral without any Pro-polisario or pro-Moroccan stance. This flag is widely used but isn't officially and internationnaly recognized as the flag of WS, at least by the UN and 147 states of this world. Daryou 15:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This flag is widely used as the flag of WS because there is a general confusion between WS (a disputed territory) and SADR (the self proclaimed Republic), the sources using this flag are either pro-polisario or ill-informed. The SADR isn't recognized by the UN and 147 states (over 192) neither is its flag. The conflict is under UN mediation, untill it's resolved, WP should be unbiased without any pro-polisario or pro-Moroccan stance. Daryou 17:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Koavf pushing Polisario's POV again and again!

message: Flag of Western Sahara This is the flag of Western Sahara, for instance, see the article linked. It is also the flag of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic and the Polisario Front. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 14:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The flag of the Polisario/RASD is not that of Western Sahara.It is very clear, and no time wasting on it.--A Jalil 15:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow Jalil, that's just flippant. Why did you revert all of the changes I made? What's your reasoning? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I did not revert all your changes. If you write something that is not POV, that is welcome. Any return to the old POV pushing attitude is not acceptable.--A Jalil 15:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't? Yes, you did revert all of my changes. Are you lying to me? Why did you do this? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here we go again. I did not revert all the changes you made to the Western Sahara articles, and you made many many. I did not mean specifically this article. Here you can't return the articles to the state they were when you were blocked, and discard others' changes.--A Jalil 15:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here we go again I didn't say you reverted all changes I made to all articles. I am using this talk page for this article, Jalil, just like it's intended. So, my question still stands: why did you revert all of my changes? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag and POV