Talk:Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

message: Whenever there are any mentions to the Prince of Persia Sands of Time Trilogy, it redirects to this page. Should there be a seperate page for the trilogy as a whole? MadJaxter 13:20, 25 June 2007 (GMT)
:Is there a need for it? I don't know if there is much information to fill it... --SoWhy Talk 18:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree with that too. But, the two different main sets under different subtitles. MadJaxter 19:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of A Sands of Time Trilogy page?

message: This linked text was removed from the Trivia/Criticisms section because User:TotalTommyTerror felt it was uncyclopedic.  --Interiot 20:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, they were unsourced, so in that respect, I agree. Ideally, critcisms and praise should be more like what Katamari Damacy, Super Mario 64, and The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask have. What is kind of sad now is that due to his edit, the article is horribly slanted to positive reviews only. This needs to be corrected. K1Bond007 03:06, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism/Trivia 

message: Who wrote that Sharaman was the one to have looted the Island of Time? Unless the PAL version is different from the NTSC version, the Maharajah was the one who had the artifacts in his vaults. That was why the Vizier defected to the Persian army in the first place; in exchange for everything else in the Maharajah's vaults the Vizier wanted to keep the dagger and the hourglass for himself. Can someone with the PAL version clear this up? --98.234.158.183 (talk) 08:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting (The Island of Time) 

message: Just a little point that was bugging me. When the Prince, after reversing time to before the sacking of the Maharajah's palace, gives Farah the Dagger of Time from HIS timeline, surely the 'original' Dagger is still sitting safely inside the Maharajahs treasure horde... Since it has yet to be claimed by the Prince. We can assume the Dahaka ate the second one as part of it's 'cleaning up' of the timeline. Any thoughts? CSkankRabbit 00:46, 18 September 2006 
:I personally agree with what you just said, but, it seems slightly inaccurate to say there are two daggers, but I get where you are coming from.
: (You forgot to sign your post, so I did it for you.) (This post contains spoilers for those who haven't played WW and T2T (the latter of which I didn't finish yet myself).)
: I don't think you can just assume that, not add it to the article either; see Wikipedia:No original research. Since the Dahaka is destroyed, does that mean it never existed, since it can travel through time? What is there to stop it to show up in the future as its younger version? It's better than my first theory, that the Dagger exists sort of "outside of time". The other Dagger in the vault was automatically erased as soon as the Prince appeared again in this part of the timeline. Of course that way Farah shouldn't have known it existed, and it's also incompatible with how the Medallion works in WW. After all, the Medallion exists twice during the period the Prince wears the Mask. Then again, the prince doesn't exist twice either after rewinding time (the entire SOT game) and ends up back in his time. Of course the Dagger and Hourglass could simply work in a different way than the Mask... actually that's pretty obvious, considering which exact powers the respective items has, so not necesarily a plot hole. In T2T the Prince still has the Medallion (for a  very short while), but shouldn't the Vizier have found it on the Island of Time in the new timeline along with the Dagger and Hourglass? Maybe it was just hidden (better). In short, when it comes to time travel there are usually plot holes, especially considering people disagree on how it works, and even if a certain way is assumed there are usually inconsistensies. Retodon8 09:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Daggers. Plot Paradox? 

message: Perhaps as it gets closer or more information is added about the movie, it should be moved to its own page. PureSoldier 03:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie 

message: What the heck are those strange fountains? They don't really seem to exist in actual reality. In The Two Thrones you return to this place once. It seems to have a connection to his other personality. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.231.225.10 (talk) 06:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life/HP Upgrade 

message: Someone wants to merge 4 articles into this one but fails to state reasons for it. I suggest a discussion about that here, myself advising against it. This article is about the first game while the proposed articles to be merged into it are valid for all 3 games of the trilogy and are complex enough to exist as seperate articles. --SoWhy Talk 14:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the templates for now, who ever added them please explain yourself. --SoWhy Talk 16:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergers 

message: :Image:Daggeroftime.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Daggeroftime.jpg

message: I noticed that when you start this game, the ubisoft intro is changed, unlike most of the games ubisoft makes, it sounds different, and is somewhat shorter.  Should we mention about this in the article?--71.116.37.15 22:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, this would be trivia imho. --SoWhy Talk 22:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note to add.......... 

message: According to page 9 of this very detailed GameSpot article about the making of the game from after the game's completion, the game does not use the JADE engine, as the team found it couldn't handle the large environments they were creating.  MrStalker, would you care to explain why you reverted it?  One of your references wasn't even from a PoP team member, and, although the other one does say it uses the JADE engine, mine does not.  It would appear that this is a deadlock. Green451 15:47, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because every other source I can find on the subject says the game uses the JADE engine. When sources contradict each other, it would be fair to assume that the fact with the most sources are the correct one. --MrStalker talk 16:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of JADE engine 

message: A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Medallion (Prince of Persia), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy).  You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Medallion (Prince of Persia).  —Disavian (talk/contribs) 16:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Medallion (Prince of Persia)

message: This is a good idea because these articles, by themselves, do not meet the notability criteria and are just lengthy expansions of the plot section of this game, and all this discussion of the plot should be put here. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge. However, I wonder how much there is to actually merge, since the plot already seems to be covered in this article. Perhaps a redirect is in order. Pagrashtak 16:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Any objection to redirecting? Pagrashtak 20:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article seems well-written and detailed enough to keep separate. But if everyone else decides to merge it, move its contents to the gaming wiki first. C Teng (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Being well-written and detailed is not enough to warrant an article if the subject is not notable. In fact, detailed in-universe content with no real-world content is not suitable for Wikipedia, per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction). Pagrashtak 16:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But it isn't just in the one game...122.104.160.66 (talk) 01:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the IP comment, those articles are about objects which are featured in different games of the triology and thus merging them with this one is not accurate. --SoWhy Talk 10:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of Sands of Time/Dagger of Time/Mask of the Wraith/Medallion (Prince of Persia) here

message: There's also a book by Sidney Sheldon by the name "The Sands of Time". Shouldn't that have an article of its own? ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 14:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it does: The Sands of Time. Where is your question? --SoWhy Talk 20:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops! I don't know how I missed that. Anyway,thanks :) ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 17:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  different topic 

message: In the "Video Games" segment of How It's Made, there is a behind-the-scenes look on how Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time came into history.  But the narrator never mentions the game or its creators or characters by name, and the show never mentions them by credits.  Instead, he uses kindergarten technique language to describe how games like this one are made.  (He also uses the same language to describe the history of games, and never mentions the video game crash of 1983.)  Just thought I'd let you know. --Angeldeb82 (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shown in ''[[How It's Made]]'' 

message: The Gameplay section is riddled with weasel words, is overly verbose, and comes off as an advertisement, most likely because it was written by Ubisoft (looks like an official release to me).  Specific sentences follow:
;"Prince of Persia The Sands of Time combines exploration and combat to create a unique synthesis."
Completely NPOV and unsourced.
;"using discovered objects to progress"
The only object that the player really discovers and uses to progress is the sword that can break walls, unless you include crates.  I'm going to leave it in because I don't know what to do with it.
;"The cultural setting of the game provides many linguistically interesting inscriptions to be found on walls."
Unsourced and has nothing to do with the gameplay.
;"The player generally attacks enemies and blocks using a sword, although other factors such as the Dagger of Time and its time-control abilities eventually prove to be critical to victory."
This sentence seems extraneous but I wasn't sure if it is felt that it needs to be mentioned that combat is done with a sword so I rephrased the portion after the comma.
;"A pivotal gameplay element is the Prince's Dagger of Time."
Unnecessary sentence which seems to be there to add emphasis.
;"and the play environment accurately resets to its previous state"
Seems redundant.
;"For example, if the Prince was struck by an enemy attack during the rewound period, the health he lost will be given back to him, or a bridge that was destroyed a few seconds ago will repair itself."
Seems unnecessary but I've left it in as it's an example.
;"However, defeated enemies are absorbed by the Dagger, replenishing its stock. The stock can also be replenished by absorbing Sand Clouds."
Removed and replaced.
;"Later on, when Farah takes the Prince's sword and dagger, after solving a puzzle he gains an extremely powerful new sword  in a large room, which has the capability to destroy the Sand like the dagger."
Seems unnecessary.
I have edited the section to try to clean it up.  Almost every power and action is described in the gameplay section, it merely doesn't go into detail about the two powers that freeze enemies.  206.125.94.244 (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay section reads like an advertisement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100707194529/http://graphics.cs.williams.edu/courses/cs12/reading/SandsOfTimePostmortem.pdf to http://graphics.cs.williams.edu/courses/cs12/reading/SandsOfTimePostmortem.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/prince-persia-sands-time_4
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/prince-persia-sands-time_10
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/prince-persia-sands-time_19
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/prince-persia-sands-time
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/prince-persia-sands-time_7
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.elspa.com/?i=3943
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/pop-sands-time
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/news/interactive-achievement-award-winners-announced
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141103150031/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/7188/features/100-best-nintendo-games-part-one/ to http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/7188/features/100-best-nintendo-games-part-one/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified