lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fish Leong

message: Can someone help to expand the awards section? Currently, it only shows the awards that she has won in Singapore. -- Kengbeng 15:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards won by Fish? 

message: Just wondering, I know her albums are usually titled using traditional characters, but should we include the simplified titles as well? And also, should the pinyin for the titles, even if there already is an English title, be included as well? ~ DarkS Umbreon 12:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplified characters for album titles? 

message: I am wondering if the 13th album shouldn't be in the compilation section instead ?
Here is the description of the album :
The new compilation titled I Love You Hereafter rounds up 18 major hits from her six studio albums came out between 2004 and 2009. What's more, two new songs are thrown in for good measure, namely "Compare Love" (tailor-made for Fish by Sandee Chan) and "La Cote d'Azur".
from http://www.yesasia.com/global/i-love-you-hereafter-2004-2009-fish-leongs-hits-2cd-dvd/1023987910-0-0-0-en/info.html
Sorry for the poor markup, I am not familiar with editing here, but you get the point and can erase this when fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.86.173.147 (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: well, it's still a new CD is it has more than a single new song on it. She got out (1st febrary 2011) and the 14th is supposed to come out tomorrow (10th august 2012) so eitherway the page should be updated to reflect it, as it has been done on the chinese version of this page (中文) 212.198.140.13 (talk) 01:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  isn't 13th album rather a compilation ?
Talk:Outlaws

message: The term Outlaw means that you were a Crip and now your a Blood, or you were a Blood and now your a Crip.
Crip? Blood? Huh? o.õ'As far as I know it means only Out-law, just as said in the article... 200.230.213.152 22:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crips/Bloods

message: The previous introductory line—"Outlaws are persons...[etc]"—would be correct if Outlaws redirected to Outlaw, and this page were located at Outlaws (disambiguation). But as it stands, Outlaw is just one possible meaning for the term Outlaws and so shouldn't be in the top line. The first thing is not necessarily a bad idea, though. Should we move the page to Outlaws (disambiguation) and redirect Outlaws? One thing to keep in mind is that "outlaw(s)" is also a common verb, and the Outlaw article doesn't cover it. But in disambiguating the incoming links, I haven't encountered any examples.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro line

message: I see the links to the TV Shows called "Outlaws", and the Episode of Lost, but what about the new show called "American Outlaws"? I find it hard to believe that a single episode is more notable than a show with multiple seasons? --Macha Panta (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New TV Show
Talk:Wimbledon High School

message: Is this relavant to an article about the school? Does anyone else have an opinion? Mouseinthehouse (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: School Song

message: The 'former pupils' category associated with this school has been nominated for renaming, along with all similar categories. Comments are invited at the categories' entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories for discussion: nomination of various 'Former pupils' categories

message: Gertrude Elles, geologist, needs to be added to the notable pupils. See her Wikipedia entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.82.8 (talk) 13:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gertrude Elles
Talk:North American Bus Industries

message: I added the clean-up tag. Problems include the changing tense in the first paragraphs and the use of unexplained terminology throughout the article.--WideArc 19:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly agree with the clean-up tag; this article is confused, does not present information in a logical order, and does not give an effective overview of the company, its history or anything else. I'll add it to my 'to-work-on' list. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 16:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've spent quite a bit of time cleaning the article up as well as expanding on some points (such as company history and adding some neutrality on the Compobus matter) and have posted a new version up. I've also removed the cleanup tag given that whatever cleanup that needed to be done has been done. Scrabbleship 04:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly a lot better - good work!  One question - there's little discussion of what Ikarus was, and no Wikilinks either. I presume from the surrounding text that it was a bus manufacturer, but little else.  Can you explain further, either here or in a separate article? Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 06:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: I would like to request an addition to the current models pictures section. I work for the transit agency in Las Vegas, and apart from currently recieving our order of 30 NABI 40-LFW Hybrids, we are also currently recieving our order of 20 NABI 40-LFW Diesels. I have uploaded a picture of this vehicle. The file name is "CAT NABI Diesel 2008.jpg".
Cello06 (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizens Area Transit NABI's 

message: NABI has either redesigned or restyled the LFW for 2012 Notice the different front end in the brochure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Playerstroke (talk • contribs) 18:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New NABI LFW Look 
Talk:La campanella

message: Copied from Andrei Gavrilov, should include in the article somehow:
Here Liszt brilliantly recreates Paganini's violinistic acrobatics. His trills create bell-like sounds. It is a very difficult piece, one that requires the rapid playing of awkwardly placed chords while also making considerable use of repeated notes.
--Missmarple 16:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: There is a real contradiction between the lead, which clearly states that this is "the final movement of Paganini's Violin Concerto No. 2 in B minor", and the entire rest of the article which refers exclusively to Liszt's piano etude on paganini. I'm not enough of a musicologist to rewrite it myself, but i do think it needs some work. Any suggestions? Cheers, Storkk (talk) 00:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead vs Article dichotomy

message: I feel as though there should be a violin recording as well seeing as Paganini (the original  composer) was a violin virtuoso. Moo4042 (talk) 17:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Moo4042: This article is mainly about Liszt piano transcription, so it's more fitting to have the piano version. Coulomb1 (talk) 04:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording
Talk:Firdos Square

message: "The site of the famous image of American troops toppling the statue of Saddam Hussein - many critics have since pointed out that the event was staged and images of the celebrating Iraqis were doctored to make the crowd appear larger than the few dozen who actually attended"
First, it is hard to doctor live TV. I'm also reading that around 150 Iraqis (rather than a "few dozen") were there even from sites critical of the event, and the article cited makes no mention of Fidrus Square specifically. Hmm, staged... rather than spontaneous? I'll try to look that up, but I'm sure there are people more aware of what's happening in Iraq than me that could try to confirm what's written. Xen0phile 16:08, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I found many blogs and indymedia posts, plus this Seattle PI editorial. Some make reference to an article by Robert Fisk for the Independent, but a paid subscription is required to read it. Xen0phile 17:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The current statue photo, :Image:SaddamStatue.jpg , may be copyrighted, and I believe a version of it was deleted at least once already from wikipedia and/or the commons. 
Versions of it are in use in many places (legally and illegally):
*http://images.google.com/images?q=saddam+statue+pulled+down
Click the above Google image search to see some locations. Here is one:
*http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_6210000/newsid_6217500/6217577.stm
I found a version of the photo with the photographer's name with it:
*http://www.katu.com/news/national/5040131.html
The caption under the photo reads:
"A U.S. Marine watches a statue of Saddam Hussein being toppled in Firdaus Square, in downtown Bagdhad in this April 9, 2003 file photo. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay, File)"
Normally, photos on U.S. military sites are in the public domain. A version of this photo is at:
*http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15524
*Photo at www.defenselink.mil 
But that is no guarantee that an image is in the public domain. I have seen this with a few photos found on military sites. They make mistakes, too. 
Here is the current deletion request page:
*http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:SaddamStatue.jpg
It is also listed here:
*http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2007/10/19 
I see now that the statue pedestal and the base of the mosque dome have no sky visible between them in the copyrighted photo. There is a clear section of sky between them in the photo from the military site. 
So maybe the photo copied to the commons is in the public domain after all. It would be good to clear this up. Please see the discussion at
* --Timeshifter 23:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saddam statue photos 

message: I suggest that you change the name of the "Anti-American Protest" to "Anti-Occupation Protest", since that would more accurately reflect the nature of the protest. It wasn't Anti American, rather it was against Coalition forces being in Iraq.58.109.122.114 (talk) 01:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Events
Talk:Steve Israel

message: I am an AP Government student expanding this Representative's page for a school assignment  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needarb (talk • contribs) 04:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1. attended Nassau Community College, Garden City, N.Y., 1978
2. attended Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y., 1978-1979
3. B.A., George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 1982
 2601:249:8200:73DB:C884:15BD:15FA:345F (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: schools
Talk:1990 NASCAR Winston Cup Series

message: Very high start, almost B-class for content. The Busch Clash and Twin 125s sections could use a little expansion. Also needs more intro. --Coredesat talk. o_O 21:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Please correctly remove all dead links Wildarms007 (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links
Talk:Columbia (automobile brand)

message: If this is all the information that can be here, perhaps merging this material into Electric Vehicle Company would be appropriate? NickelShoe 16:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: The article says the Runabout cost $750 and then the next paragraph says is cost $850. Which is correct? Or were both correct but in different years? The Autoweek reference says $850. Can't see any reference for the $750 figure.  Stepho  talk  07:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found part of the answer myself. The Leslie reference (Jan 1904, presumably written in late 1903) gives a price of $750, with an indication that it will rise to $800 in 1904. The Autoweek reference (2006) says the 1903 Runabout was $850. Still not quite consistent though.  Stepho  talk  08:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't give you a citation, but I suspect in these early years prices fluctuated frequently.HornColumbia talk 12:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Runabout price 

message: The Columbia Runabout is described as having twenty 'batteries'. Battery here really means 'cell', the basic 2V lead-acid unit with its own filler cap. Cells can be packaged in various ways to make a battery. Most people think of a battery as a self contained item, like a 6V battery with three cells in series. The Baker Electric car specification gives the number of 'cells' not batteries, and I think cell should be here used instead of less clear term battery.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.200.163 (talk) 06:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battery vs Cell
Category talk:Nostradamus

message: This is an OK idea, but it should be populated wisely and sparingly, and in accordance with the standards that apply elsewhere in Wikipedia. France, for example, would not be proper, even though ND was French and many of his prophecies concerned France. Writers about ND belong here, as do specific Nostradamian articles, such as Mabus. The kings of France hardly belong here, but I'm leaving them for now. Salon-de-Provence probably does belong here, in that the little town has made an industry of its connection with the seer. Bill 16:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Segue (music)

message: This article should not wikilink to Segway the scooter in its intro. The article about the scooter links back to this one in a "Trivia" section, because the notion of segue as a smooth transition inspired the name of the scooter. Mentioning the scooter in this article, especially in the very first sentence, is distracting to people who are trying to find out about the musical term. FreplySpang (talk) 16:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hannes Hafstein

message: I am wondering if the term "CEO" is appropriate here.  It seems like an anachronism to me.  Would "President" or even "head" not be better? Carptrash 16:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Pine View School for the Gifted

message: Should PVSpeech.com really be listed?  I'm not sure that a student-run message board is encyclopedically valuable.  And one other editor has deleted the link already.  Starwiz 16:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PVSpeech.com

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as requested, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article needs more information and a good copy edit. It also needs work on WP:NPOV Adam McCormick 06:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007 

message: Shouldn't this article be titled Pine View School for the Gifted? Swimmerwinner72 (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Really? PV is a public school, completely. 98.219.123.213 (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi private

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain t/c 04:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Mdann52 (talk) 12:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that's the official name. Although Pine View School is used more, adding "the Gifted" makes it the official name. Alexpvs (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Bruh the school was founded in 1969 not 1968 and its official name is Pine View School for the Gifted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.205.95.153 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Portal talk:Scouting/Scouting news

message: Why there isn't news about Ukrainian scouts? Ukrainian scouts are one of the most active scouts in the world! Boduni (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because we are not aware of the news. If you have the news, in English since this is the English wiki, please point us to the link. — Rlevse • Talk •  11:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I want adding news about Ukrainian scouts? but I don't know english well. Who knows? can adding them from Ukrainian scouting-site.  I shall be very thankful. Boduni (talk) 10:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's in Ukranian. Is there someone who can translate it? If so, we'd be glad to add it.  — Rlevse • Talk •  13:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Boduni, звернися на Portal talk:Ukraine: там багато людей знають українську і англійською добре володіють.--Ahonc (Talk)  15:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: * http://www.scoutingnews.org/ --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  14:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Fight Night 2004

message: Fight Night 2004 is a boxing game developed by EA Sports. It is the successor to EA's previous boxing series, Knockout Kings. A sequel, Fight Night: Round 2, was released in 2005. Its chief draws are a career mode, in-depth and reasonably realistic fighting and an analog stick-based control scheme dubbed Total Punch Control, which was re-used, with enhancements, in the sequel.
I created a stub article for the game. I'll try to find some more information tomorrow, including the release date(s). But before anyone contributes, see below. TaintedMustard 16:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created Stub Article 

message: With Fight Night: Round 3 approaching release, I think that all Fight Night articles (currently 2004 and Round 2) should be merged into one Fight Night series article and that all of the individual games in the series should redirect to there, as with EA's other annual sports series': Madden NFL, NBA Live and the rest. Knowing EA, it will simply be an updated version of Round 2 (itself merely an improved version of 2004), with small enhancements and better graphics, and an individual article on each game seems excessive when the core gameplay features are identical. I would have done this immediately, but didn't want to step on anyone's toes. TaintedMustard 16:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight Night Series
Talk:James F. Howard Jr.

message: I object to the speedy deletion. Article was proposed to deletion and PROD tag was removed with commentary "Object to deletion; notable figure in field who, if he actually wrote his own entry, should be faulted for excessive modesty, not vanity" by Monicasdude. As speedy is more severe than PROD and at least one user claims notability of Mr. Howard, article deserves AFD discussion. --Jan Smolik 22:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection to the speedy deletion 
Talk:Chahar Cheragh Square

message: Hi i was looking here cause the category Kurdistan. This category exists and so I think we should put this article in this category. I know the problem, many people see this political, but under geographic aspects, 
Kurdistan is both the name of a geographic region and a cultural region in the Middle East named after the Kurds, a large ethnic group living in parts of Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Armenia, and Syria. From the Article: Kurdistan. So I think we should put it in this category. --Japan01 16:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article states: "At this Place the Russian-backed Qazi Muhammad proclamated the Republic of Mahabad in 1946. Here, after restoring Iranian authority and chasing the Russian-backed elements away in 1947, Qazi Muhammad, and other political leaders of the Republic of Mahabad were executed by people."
If this isn't POV then I don't know what!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.211.101.164 (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Lie: The Love and Terror Cult

message: Seriously.  Who labeled that? VelvetKevorkian 03:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black metal? 

message: The above article claims that the Smelly Cat song was inspired by Garbage Dump???? - SimonLyall 08:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Smelly Cat]] 

message: Charles Manson was not the only vocalist and he did not play bass, look here https://www.discogs.com/Charles-Manson-LIE-The-Love-And-Terror-Cult/release/1506934  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.30.19.229 (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line up 

message: Is Charles Manson first known as an “American musician” or a cult leader / criminal? I’m pretty sure if you polled the general public, “musician” isn’t going to be their first impression / memory of him. Just an observation. 75.106.32.81 (talk) 23:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Notoriety  …
Talk:Dushasana

message: Query; the article has been moved from Dushasana to Dushyasana. Is this correct, remembering we should be looking back to the original Sanskrit? I thought it was Duśśāsana (using IAST symbols), and the references are many, e.g., http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m06/m06118.htm . I see that there is also justification for the Dushyasana form, but is this from some other language? Imc 17:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed back to Dushasana. Removed note on pronounciation because that is modern Hindi. Imc 20:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Kindly discuss it here first rather than edit warring. Please use sources also. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs)  17:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPs changing Dushasana's death part
Talk:Gooseberry Falls State Park

message: My brother fell off the waterfall at Gooseberry.  Where can I mention this in the article?  Just kidding. He really did though.--Hraefen 17:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hope he's OK. If you find a source that talks about people falling there, some general mention of that could be added. Jonathunder 19:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

text: uhmmm is he okay,,,? 208.123.6.167 (talk) 23:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox says that the park is in IUCN Category II, for a national park.  This isn't a national park -- it's a state park.  Does the IUCN database list this as a national park, or is it in some other category?  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 18:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN category
Talk:Bishop's Stortford College

message: high because of head of state. Needs infobox and references. welcome Victuallers 13:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: Hi all
I'm Head of Physics at the College and will be working with the College Staff to make this page far better.  Watch this space! Adrian Baker 17:16, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: suggest Robert Kirby is added--Profstandwellback (talk) 15:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous old stortfordians 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... looking at the report, it seems to be a case "where free-content edits overlie the infringement, or where there is only partial infringement or close paraphrasing" and so is a candidate for  Wikipedia:Copyright problems rather than Speedy. I would also note that much of the problematic text has been in this article since 2008, and it is quite possible that the College website copied us. DuncanHill (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: The following are from the first few pages of a Google search for "Bishop's Stortford College History" -
These may help to recover some of the early history that was deleted in November owing to being unsourced. Tony Holkham (Talk) 15:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The principal source for the school's early history is Bishop's Stortford College 1868-1968: A Centenary Chronicle, by John Morley & Norman Monk-Jones, JM Dent & Sons, London, 1969, ISBN 460 04801 5. The fact that the article consists of PR witter about events since last Tuesday is a bit sad. Khamba Tendal (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google search