lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Ontario TV

message: I've been reviewing the FCC database, and i've seen some new channel allocations/station applications for the Greater Toronto Area. All station applications so far have been for Toronto, Ontario, and are to broadcast from the CN Tower  The stations are:
* CHMY-TV 52 Toronto (possible re-naming of CKXT-TV)
*  CJAA-TV 52 Toronto (possible re-naming of CKXT-TV)
* CJAA-TV-32 Kitchener (rebroadcast transmitter for Kitchener, Ontario)
* CJIS-TV 66 Toronto (Digital Television station only)
These also show up on other websites, such as http://www.tvfool.com, which has a rather large resource for TV stations and signals (even KMZ files to show signal strength of stations). Now, does this mean more stations are going to take to the air in the Toronto area?  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 23:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, these are old call signs that CKXT was considering prior to its launch, but ended up not using. Toronto has no new television stations either licensed or pending at the present time. Per NERW on January 6, 2003, CJIS was going to be the call; 66 is CKXT's digital channel assignment. And CHMY is currently in use in Renfrew. The CRTC's policy on this is different from the FCC's; there can't be a CHMY-TV in Toronto if there's a CHMY-FM in Renfrew. Bearcat 03:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ohh..similar to the FCC during the 1980s, with WJW-AM-FM-TV? As well, i suppose there will not be a kitchener translator, since one in london's going up?  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 15:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More stations to crowd toronto market?
Talk:Special weather statement

message: Are the examples that important? They add a considerable amount of length to the article and I feel they aren't completely necessary in this encyclopedic environment. Sethcampbell7293 (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:The Girl Who Never Was

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium 14:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Baltimore Highlands, Maryland

message: I am proposing the merger of Baltimore Highlands, Maryland into Lansdowne-Baltimore Highlands, Maryland. This seems a reasonable combination, because the proposed target for the merger already includes most of the text to be merged. The merger will also help resolve confusion between the Baltimore Highlands of Baltimore County and a neighborhood of the same name in East Baltimore. Folklore1 (talk) 20:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed on September 20, 2011. Folklore1 (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article still exists, so I have changed the template to say class=start|importance=low. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Paul Zastupnevich

message: This page will develop over time with more details on his acting and costume design career.  Please retain this page.  Many thanks.
:You need to assert this person's notability.  Being somebodys assistant, being born on christmas eve, being a costume designer, and owning a business is not notable. - Rjd0060 23:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iris Wildthyme (audio drama series)

message: The Short summaries were from the original versions of these pages   . I haven't checked them all but many read like copy and pastes from Big Finish's website or CD covers (for example ). This requires a clean up to meet the Episode List's  requirements, if anyone feels up to the task feel free to take it on. Cheers, Dresken (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short Summaries
Talk:List of former Warner Records artists

message: Nelly Furtado never recorded for Warner Bros. Records! Festival Mushroom Records was founded after she was signed by DreamWorks Records! Peace. (MuzikJunky 23:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nelly Furtado

message: Lists of current artists are non-encyclopedic per WP:NOTDIR and outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Island Records artists pburka (talk) 21:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 14:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of current Warner Records artists]] into [[List of former Warner Records artists]]
Talk:Cyberman (audio drama series)

message: There seems to be doubt over the notability of some individual CDs of Doctor Who spin-off audio plays. Many don't have enough secondary references to show notability and also the coverage is often limited to a cast list and a two line synopsis.
I am wondering if a merge might help, with either one article representing the whole Cyberman series. Amalgamated the range may be more noteworthy than the individual releases within it.
The downside to this proposal is: who would do it. No-one in Wikiproject Doctor Who has been interested enough to claim this article.
But if anyone is reading- do you agree/disagree? Rankersbo (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems sensible to merge rather than delete, if htose are the choices.  I've just been looking around for sources for this (was it reviewed in DWM?  Is DWM considerred reliable as a source?) StuartDouglas (talk) 10:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  They're reliable enough and substantively cover the topic.  I'll get on with the merge as no-one has complained. Rankersbo (talk) 06:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's much neater and more useful now, imo.  Might be an idea to do the same thing for the Dalek Empire series (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalek_War)? StuartDouglas (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The old articles had much that was duplicated from article to article. I should be working on my MSc dissertation, so there shouldn't be a lot of effort put into this on my part ;) Rankersbo (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

text: OK merge has been performed, but there is possibly more work to do (tidy up, formatting as ep list etc. Rankersbo (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge
Talk:Hoshi no Kirby: Ultra Super Deluxe

message: Alot of Kirby fans have been speculating about and looking forward to this game. I expect this article to be edited by some more devoted Kirby devotees as soon as we get more info, just a heads up if someone wants to nominate this for speedy deletion or something of the like. --Phantom Kirby 23:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, This game looks awesome 

message: I just heard something about this today on a forum that i frequently go to. Is this really legit? The person i heard it from had no sources other then wikipedia. Is it really true?The Great Morgil 20:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This was confirmed in issue 24 of the Official Nintendo Magazine in Europe.  --Super Shy Guy Bros.Not shy? 18:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: I believe the official name is "Hoshi no Kirby Ultra Super Deluxe". 208.101.136.224 (talk) 18:29, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change?
Talk:Stanley Moss

message: I have created a Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:57, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: I added a comment that he is one of the oldest living practicing poets. This is obvious from the fact that his most recent books were published when he was 95 and 97, so I hope my addition will not be zinged for lack of a source. People can look at the date of his birth (1925) and the date of his most recent book (2022) and judge for themselves. Pascalulu88 (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still at it late in the game
Talk:Newbie

message: Newb = beginner (new player, not necessarily unwilling to learn)
Noob = a nobody (ignorant player not willing to learn)
N00b = originates from the 0 (0 = a nobody) replacement and constitutes a derogatory term of a skilled player or a friendly poke at someone's ego/performance in the mannen you have like a noob, its the same place from where pr0 stems from and can be tracked allenast as far back as 2005, probably all the way back to Q1. 95.195.157.112 (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is shite, does nobody differentiate these terms anymore? 

message: It may also be a variant (new b[eginn]er), or a comparative (more noob than noob). --Wisdood (talk) 12:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  noober
Talk:White River Falls State Park

message: http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20130831/OUTDOORS/308310001/Rocky-canyon-hides-gem-White-River-Falls-State-Park-?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|Home|p  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.250.17 (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  News article on park
Talk:Intelligent vehicular ad hoc network

message: I merged two of the three paragraphs of the other article, this one For both, mobile ad hoc and infrastructure-based communication with mobile nodes, solutions exist and are applied to vehicular environments. For adhoc routing, position-based routing has emerged as a promising candidate. Likewise, for nfrastructurebased communication with mobile hosts, such as cellular networks, Mobile IPv6 represents a wellknown solution for mobility support based on IP addressing and packet forwarding. For integration of Mobile IPv6 and ad hoc routing a number of technical problems need to be solved, including the efficient distribution of router advertisements, selection of Internet gateways, and movement detection of the mobile node. seemed to duplicate (in different wording) subject matter already covered in this article. —Random832 15:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  InVANET article 
Talk:J'accuse (1919 film)

message: The composer is listed as Arthur Honegger, but although Honegger & Abel Gance did collaborate on later films, this film is not on the list of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Films_scored_by_Arthur_Honegger, and I can't find any other sources to back up this claim. However, a DVD version has been distributed online with a recent (2009) orchestral score by composer Robert Israel (see https://www.gartenbergmedia.com/dvd-distribution-and-sales/international-silent-classics/jaccuse-a-film-by-able-gance). The versions available on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EclZmazsnmQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BXyjMH6NJs) don't list credits for music, but they seem to match an excerpt on Robert Israel's YouTube account (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFK1cLTgDLQ).
So, my question is: Is there any source to back up an Arthur Honegger soundtrack for this film? (And if so, where can I find it?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davigoli (talk • contribs) 23:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composer of soundtrack 

message: This page has already been moved several times to amend its title, and it's still not right. The film is clearly best known by its original title and not by a translation, and the title that appears in the film itself is J'accuse - without an exclamation mark. The contemporary publicity has no exclamation mark (see the image in the article). Most reference books also cite it in that form. 
You find the exclamation mark in some sources - notably IMDb. They may have been misled by the title of the Zola letter which the film title echoes - that was J'Accuse...! (see J'accuse (letter)). It also appears in some of the film's intertitles when someone says "J'accuse!" - but that's dialogue, not the title.
There are plenty of redirects to get you to the article, BUT (a) it complicates direct searching, and (b) it is inaccurate.
The same argument probably applies to the 1938 remake, but I don't have access to original materials to verify it. Lampernist (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title of the film 

message: No mention of the 1938 remake version in the main article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.79.214.12 (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Look again. The last sentence of the article says, "In 1938, Gance made another version of J'accuse, this time with sound and looking ahead to the imminent outbreak of World War II." Lampernist (talk) 10:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1938 Remake?
Talk:Lake of Fire (film)

message: It seems rather fishy to have such a large section of the page devoted to criticism (and insinuations of bias), when the documentary is almost universally lauded by critics (and universally by RT's "top critics"), who call it an honest film. I'm not gonna be the one to change it though... this is the first time I've actually used a Discussion page, so I'm a little clueless about changing things to articles. SheepOG (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Civilian Community Corps/Article structure

message: Due to the way the table of contents works, the method used for the first sub-page does not work well here, so I thought I would try using a single working copy than can be edited just like the regular page would be.
If you feel the orginal format is better please state so. Or if you think something should be change go ahead and make the change. We can use the history to view what the previous versions looked like.  Too bad I did not think of this first. I could have save the orninal before making the changes. Sorry about that. Dbiel (Talk) 00:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First draft of a revised structure
Talk:Bile acid sequestrant

message: In his best-selling "The 8 week cholesterol cure" book, Kowalski asserts that soluble dietary fibers like the beta glucans in oats (there are many more) sequester bile acids and that this is the explanation for their beneficial effects on serum cholesterol levels.  
Assuming this is true, its omission from this article should be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdnctx (talk • contribs) 18:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soluble dietary fiber a natural and powerful bile acid sequestrant?
Talk:Bile canaliculus

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/digestion/liver/anatomy.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 22:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cystic duct

message: The sentence "In this way, bile is stored in the gallbladder in between meal times and released after a fatty meal." sounds funny. How does the Gall Bladder analyze the contents of a meal in order to determine whether its contents are "fatty" or not? I guess this article needs the attention of a specialist. --AVM (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has to do with the hormone cholecystokinin.  I added some information from the common bile duct article to help.  Ajnosek (talk) 01:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fatty meal"
Talk:Accessory bile duct

message: The literature isn't so clear...
Based on a search of 'duct of Luschka' on PubMed ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez ):
===Sub===
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16830216
World J Surg. 2006 Jul;30(7):1316-20.
A study of the subvesical bile duct (duct of Luschka) in resected liver specimens.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16927110
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Sep;391(5):441-7
Bile leaks from the duct of Luschka (subvesical duct): a review.
===Supra===
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14614740
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Nov;38(11):E21-3.
Bile duct of Luschka leading to bile leak after cholecystectomy--revisiting the biliary anatomy.
"Bile ducts of Luschka (also called supravesicular ducts) are small bile ducts in the gallbladder bed."
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Mar;180(3):694-6.
Bile duct of Luschka connecting with the cystohepatic duct: the importance of cholangiography during surgery.
http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/180/3/694
"In general, the bile duct of Luschka is a thin, short, vestigial bile duct lying in the gallbladder bed [1]."  -- refs Br J Surg. 1989 Jul;76(7):696-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2765803
===Not clear===
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16447481
Am Surg. 2005 Dec;71(12):1060-5.
Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: management and outcome.
===Neither===
Dorland's Medical Dictionary (30 Ed.): Tubular structures in the GB wall. Some connect with bile ducts but none connect with the lumen of the GB.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12886748
Bile leak from the accessory biliary duct following laparascopic cholecystectomy.
Anatomists and surgeons have described the presence of accessory biliary ducts between the liver and gallbladder
http://www.whonamedit.com/synd.cfm/2390.html
neither supra or sub
I suspect it can be either supra or sub. 
I'm thinking the best term would be accessory bile duct, it is descriptive and fits both for supra & sub. Nephron  T|C 06:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Supravesical vs subvesical vs accessory

message: Dorland's Medical Dictionary (30 Ed.): Tubular structures in the GB wall. Some connect with bile ducts but none connect with the lumen of the GB.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12886748
Bile leak from the accessory biliary duct following laparascopic cholecystectomy.
Anatomists and surgeons have described the presence of accessory biliary ducts between the liver and gallbladder
http://www.whonamedit.com/synd.cfm/2390.html
neither supra or sub
I suspect it can be either supra or sub. 
I'm thinking the best term would be accessory bile duct, it is descriptive and fits both for supra & sub. Nephron  T|C 06:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neither
Talk:Glycogen storage disease type 0

message: How it comes that fructose intolerance is a differential diagnosis of GSD type 0 ??
many differences exist: like fructose-1-phosphate accumulate in the liver causing hepatomegally.
May be it simulates other types of GSD in which glycogen accumulate & cause hepatomegally.
dr.yasir al-bayati  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasir muhammed ali (talk • contribs) 17:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  May be in other types of GSD, not type 0
Talk:Cystohepatic triangle

message: "The hepatobiliary triangle (or cystohepatic triangle) is an anatomic space bordered by the common hepatic artery medially, the cystic duct inferiorly and the superior border to the cystic artery [1]."
I don't think this is correct.  My understanding is that the superior border of the triangle of Calot is the inferior surface of the liver, and that the cystic artery can be viewed traversing the triangle anteriorly.  It's a surgically important landmark, since you can rule out the major anatomical variations and identify the important structures for a cholecystectomy.
Mastery of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery seems to agree  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.226.154 (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct borders? (Resolved)
Talk:Kimberly Brady

message: There is no justifiable reason for a character like Bo to be considered Kimberly's half-brother when they both have the same legal father and the same legal mother. If Bo is going to be a half-brother, how can Max and Frankie be considered full brothers just because they have the same legal father and the same legal mother as Kim? If all four share the same legal father and the same legal mother (which they do), then all four need to be related to each the same way. It's simple 2 + 2 = 4. hahaCebr1979 (talk) 23:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This matter has already been discussed here. The consensus is that Bo is their half-brother, due to Shawn not being the biological and adoptive father, while Frankie and Max were adopted by both parents.Jester66 (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a consensus talk that solves the adoption issue. That's just original research based on what a step-father is and what should be classified as a half-brother.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Caroline is the biological mother to Bo, Shawn is not. Therefore, Kim and the others are Bo's half siblings. Jester66 (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That's excellent information that everyone already knows, Jester. You're also excellently avoiding the issue (except not really "excellently" 'cause I keep bringing the nonsense of it back up).Cebr1979 (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm stating facts that you seem to ignore. Jester66 (talk) 01:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you're not. You're creating "facts" in order to have everything your way even though it rarely makes sense and when you get asked a question you can't answer you say something that makes even less sense in an attempt to change the topic... That doesn't work with me, though.Cebr1979 (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half/full siblings 

message: This page need a picture to represent the actor  Kaylamarlena (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of kimberly brady