Talk:Prince-Bishopric of Utrecht

message: I just cleaned the article a bit and added some whitespace, so the article is no longer just one big pile of text. The article might need a new introduction though. Goingin 16:17, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article as it stands is a bit confusing being both concerned with both the persons of the (Arch)bishop and the (insitution) of the Diocese. I am going to rewrite a bit and will split this article in 2, maybe three articles. (considering the fact that the OC and RC Dioceses of Utrecht are quite different institutions. 
--Isolani 14:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, at least for the Roman Catholic Archdiocese. Don't know what folks want to do with the Old Catholics. Benkenobi18 (talk) 09:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  distinguish bishop from archdiocese 

message: I think that this article, as well as the related articles found in the relevant discussion box above, can be improved by:
*moving all the lists of bishops during the period before the suppression of the original archdiocese into either Archdiocese of Utrecht (695–1580) article or List of bishops and archbishops of Utrecht (695–1580) or List of bishops and archbishops of Utrecht, as is done in the corresponding article in the Dutch Wikipedia
*moving all the lists of bishops and administrators during the period of the missions into either Dutch Mission or List of apostolic vicars and officials of the Dutch Mission, as is done in the corresponding article in the Dutch Wikipedia
*moving all the lists of Old Catholic archbishops into either Old Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht or a separate List of Old Catholic archbishops of Utrecht, as is done in the corresponding article in the Dutch Wikipedia
*The Bishopric of Utrecht existed from 1024 to 1528. The only those bishops who were in the ecclesial office between 1024 and 1528 were also in the contemporaneous secular office of prince ruling over secular feudal estates. This should either be noted in a list of bishops or be contained in a separate List of prince-bishops and prince-archbishops of Utrecht.
Please comment in Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Utrecht#Lists of bishops to centralize the discussion.
–BoBoMisiu (talk) 20:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of bishops 

message: I created a talkspace draft for collaborate on a cartulary section for the article. I believe this will help develop content about the history prior to the 1024 establishment of the Bishopric of Utrecht.
View the draft page at Talk:Bishopric of Utrecht/Cartulary section draft.
View the the draft's talk page at Talk:Bishopric of Utrecht/Cartulary section draft-talk.
—BoBoMisiu (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cartulary section draft

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Episcopal principality of Utrecht. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070805192352/http://www.kdc.kun.nl/geschiedenis/vicarissen.html to http://www.kdc.kun.nl/geschiedenis/vicarissen.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've restored the article to the original title of Bishopric of Utrecht over the redirect that was created by a move in 2015. The term used in describing episcopal principalities within the Holy Roman Empire is "Bishopric of X", compare "episcopal+principality+of+Utrecht"+-wiki+-wikipedia 38 hits for "episcopal principality of Utrecht" to "bishopric+of+utrecht"+-wiki+-wikipedia 15,500 hits for "bishopric of Utrecht". The term used in article titles across enwiki for spiritual territories is, similarly "Bishopric of X" and, while the Encyclopædia Britannica doesn't cover this in separate articles, it refers to "bishopric of … Utrecht" and " of Utrecht" in their article History of the Low Countries (my emphasis):  and  — OwenBlacker (talk; please  me in replies) 11:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title