lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Karunakara Guru

message: Hello Sir
I'm nominating this page for deletion because it is written with a point of view , excessive use of unreliable sources.and the title "Khalistan" is wrong for the topic because "Khalistan" does not exist,lack of support from resident Punjabi's and Sikhs in India, but there was a "Movement for Khalistan" and that is the right title for the topic, and i think this whole article "a new name" should be rewritten with the help of people from sikh community "in" India and other Indians, because this topic is related to politics/people of India.We all should understand Khalistan is not a political entity and having a article is not justified, Microsoft Encarta and Britannic encyclopedia don't have an article known as "Khalistan" but they do have articles on the movement that took place decades back, and i think there are also copyright issues involved with this article because big parts of this article are written on other peoples research. Many reliable sources are used to show "one side" of their view on the topic, there are also indications that organisations banned by US and EU are involved in providing their research on the movement.I am a strong supporter to have a stub on this topic , but im afraid that such articles on wikipedia have become mouthpieces for organisation which are known for disrupting peace (assassination of one of india's prime minister, twin bomb blast in New Delhi on the eve of Diwali) in Indian sub continent.
This article requires your attention , please help.
Anmol.2k4 18:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request,Nomination for removal of [[Khalistan]] article
Talk:FBK Kaunas

message: Do anybody knows is this club relegated to 2nd of Division of Lithuania User:Alakbaroff 18:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Club relegated?

message: I was writing something on Aurelijus Skarbalius, and I'ld like for someone who knows to tell me if the FK Inkaras Kaunas team he played on is identical to FBK Kaunas? Poulsen 22:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Aurelijus Skarbalius
Talk:Charles W. Socarides

message: In this edit I changed methods to revert homosexuality to methods to treat homosexuality. "Revert" is a problematic word here; it means to change back to a previous state or condition, and so in this sentence it implies homosexuality is an abnormal deviation and that gay people can be 'changed back' into straight people. I'm not entirely happy with treat, either; I'd feel a little better if it had sneerquotes around it (thus: methods to 'treat' homosexuality), but I wonder if there might be a better word here. Cure…? Probably not; Socarides claimed homosexuality could/should be treated, but I don't know that he ever claimed to "cure" it. Pogorrhœa (talk) 00:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I found and added a reliable source for Socarides' belief in "curing" homosexuality, which resolves the word-choice problem. Pogorrhœa (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Revert" = NPOV
Talk:Sous

message: The article uses several spellings throughout the text inconsistently. Does anyone know the preferred spelling of the topic?
IceBlaeze (talk) 04:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, well spotted. It should be 'Sous', as in the article title. I have made a few corrections. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling inconsistencies?

message: It's kinda obvious. The name is sus, memers will ruined humour will edit this Rektz (talk) 13:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs edit protection
Talk:Domenico Trezzini

message: Hello, I wanted to ask, if anything against to translate this artikle into german and put the translated content to the german version of wikipedia, tomreplay 28.12.2005
*Of course, nobody, is against it, that is the GDFL is for - to spread the human knowledge. If you will state in the edit summary on the German wiki, that this is a translation from the English wiki, it will simplify the verification of the article. abakharev 00:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know why, but there is a lack of information here. Trezzini was Malcantonese, near Lugano, that's of Italian origin. He should be considered Italian-Swiss. We cannot omit that. There are many sources:
- Ugo Donati, Malcantonesi in Russia, "Almanacco Malcantonese e bassa Valle del Vedeggio", 1944, 22-25. 
- Ettore Lo Gatto, Gli Artisti italiani in Russia, vol. I, Gli architetti a Mosca e nelle province, ed. Libri Schewiller, Milano 1990; 
- Id., vol. II, Gli architetti del secolo XVIII a Pietroburgo e nelle tenute imperiali, Scheiwiller, Milano 1993; 
- Id., vol. IV Scultura, pittura, decorazione e arti minori, Scheiwiller, Milano 1991.
 
- Bernardino Croci Maspoli-Giancarlo Zappa (a cura di), Le maestranze artistiche malcantonesi in Russia dal XVII al XX secolo, ed Octavo, Firenze 1994. 
- Giampiero Cuppini (a cura di), Gli architetti italiani a San Pietroburgo, ed. Consorzio Università - Città di Bologna, 1996. 
In addition, you can find Russian sources in which he is called the Italian builder.
Jack 15:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was Italian-Swiss
Talk:Demographics of Argentina

message: This article is entirely devoid of mention of Scottish settlement, despite Argentina having the largest Scottish diaspora population outside the English-speaking world, and being the only country outside the Anglosphere that celebrates National Tartan Day.  See Tartan Day#Argentina. I was going to link to Demographics of Argentina from that section, but at this point doing so would just confuse the reader because the expected detail is just missing.  There's even a Scottish Argentines article; perhaps that can be given WP:SUMMARYSTYLE treatment here, though I have not yet pored over it.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  05:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scottish Argentines 

message: WikiJuan. First, “There is no point in clarifying the origin of Europeans, there is a respective section for that, in the same way that indigenous peoples are not listed in the infobox.” It is a fact that the majority of the population predominantly descends from these regions, but there is an entire sector (and entire articles) where it is developed. It is not appropriate to clarify this in a section of the infobox where ethnicities are listed, this was not done in any other article. Second, the information on the genetic percentages is fine, but it is obviously a note, as found in the article in Spanish. As it stands now, the "note" doesn't work and there's an entire sentence out of place. Only ethnic groups with their (estimated) percentages should be included, as is found in all articles on demographics. I ask you to correct it or delete it, because as it currently stands it is wrong. Sargen220 (talk 04:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Karl Holz (Nazi)

message: there is no evidence, that Holz was a pagan.Are there any certain sources? If not I will remove him from the category.--Samon93 (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: neopagan

message: What does "Every bit as unsqueamish as his predecessor as Gauleiter, Julius Streicher, Holz boasted many penalties for political crimes (by his own count 17, and among those 5 prison sentences" mean? I presume that the article was translated from German, but it actually is largely meaningless.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.59.167.152 (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:Chilean horse

message: It is well known that the mapuches and other related tribes stealed horses from the sorroundings of Buenos Aires to then sell them in Chile.. Nothing about this apears in the article. Dentren 22:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mapuche Smuggling

message: #Its one if not the oldest registered breed horse breed from South America.
#It is was the only horse to exist en Chile during colonial times
#It the only horse allowed in Chilean rodeo
#Its still the main horse on rural areas of Chile
Not only international competition breeds are to be in the mid-importance, the Chilean horse is an emblemitic symbol of Chilean culture, its considered part of Chilean national identity. Dentren | Talk 21:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Little of which is relevant, we have DOZENS of breeds that are the biggest breed in their own nation or symbolic of their nation, in fact, the same could probably be said of half of the 350+ breed articles here.  More to the point, what has been the contribution of this breed to the rest of the world?  What other breeds were created from it?  A breed such as the Andalusian, Thoroughbred or Arabian is "high" because of their significant impact on dozens of other light horse breeds.  Major breeds of international importance become "mid" because they also have a significant worldwide influence.  However, note that even breeds like Connemara pony, which is iconic or Ireland are classed "low" by WPEQ even though "mid" by WP Ireland.  Welsh pony, on the other hand, is "mid" in part due to its significant influence on other breeds and major worldwide presence.  Montanabw(talk) 03:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: on why Chilean horse article is of mid-importance to WP equine
Talk:Outcast

message: Do we need another disambiguation page at The Outcasts? Here we now have Outcast, Outcasts and The Outcast - I am unsure there is such a clear dividing line between them and The Outcasts. I suppose you could have one each for the 4 but I don't really see there being a big call for it. I'm not going to switch it back but I am still unsure it is required and could cause confusion. (Emperor 17:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Perhaps we should move it from
 Outcast
to
 Outcast (disambiguation)
What do you think?--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strength alone 01:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Outcast (disambiguation)?
Talk:Wilburton Trestle

message: http://www.railfanswelcome.com/RailfansWelcome.htm claims that this is the longest trestle in USA. 
Brianhe 22:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article currently contradicts itself about when the line opened. - Jmabel | Talk 01:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 1904 seems much more probable to me, since that is the date that Wilburton as a community claims as its origin. - Jmabel | Talk 04:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Given a total lack of citation for 1902, I believe we should change this to say 1904, consistently. - Jmabel | Talk 04:57, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it.  The 1902 date wasn't added to the article until November 2007. The same edit added a source that may have supported the date, but the link is inactive so I can't confirm this.  The 1902 category was added in March 2008, most likely just following the infobox data.  — Myasuda (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1902 or 1904?
Talk:The Long Tomorrow (comics)

message: http://www.brmovie.com/FAQs/BR_FAQ_BR_Influence.htm
Maybe even Heavy Metal (magazine) deserves to include references to BR & N?
193.173.39.45 (talk) 09:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What about Neuromancer (William Gibson) if Blade Runner (Ridley Scott) is already mentioned?
Talk:335th Fighter Squadron

message: I served 335 from 1966 to 1970
They were flying f4c and f4d from 1966 to 1970.  335 deployed to Korea kusan  jan to June 1968 during publeo..  nato exercise rigi Norway march to april 1969
Deployed to Korea jan to may 1970 kusan Korea.  They were fullfing nuke duty 184.170.75.40 (talk) 15:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong timeliness for 335 deployments
Template talk:User Wikipediholic

message: I was wondering about the mess of <noinclude>s and <includeonly>s at the bottom–are these required for it to display properly, or what? I was afraid to touch it becuase of all the breaking going on (). — SheeEttin {T/C} 22:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed... --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 00:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mess
Talk:New York State Route 9A

message: GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:C. No original research: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:B. Focused: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
No apparent problems with prose, well-cited, images where appropriate. This is also the 3000th good article. NF24(radio me!Editor review) 23:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Passed Good Article nomination!

message: This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: USRD GA audit
MediaWiki talk:Sitesubtitle

message: Note: this text is used on MediaWiki:Citethispage-content, which is employed by the Special:Cite page.  — Catherine\talk 23:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: More importantly, the site subtitle is shown directly underneath the main site title when using the Cologne Blue skin. John Reid 07:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Mavericks

message: I don't know if this is considered a usable source, but on Ed Friedland's facebook page  of April 22, 2023 he announced he had left The Mavericks.  Raul Malo is now playing bass.  Friedland is touring with another band now,  so it's probably safe to move him into the "former" column.
https://www.facebook.com/basswhisperertv/posts/pfbid0utwKQUhVvkPXdXu1V7SKZBb8MhweUeY9Rkj1WqdrLMtKeRWrru4QSxW4b7kv5gNYl 74.194.168.98 (talk) 22:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ed Friedland
Talk:Pentax *ist DS

message: What is meant by "*ist" ? helohe (talk) 23:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the rather weird name of the line of cameras.  Apparantly it's a marketing thing, saying you can be anything you want, by putting that before the "ist".  ie: Artist, Journalist, Photographist (even though the last one's not a real word, but you get the point).--Raguleader 06:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No subject
Talk:Arlecchino

message: Mihoyo this is pure torture what you did to Argenti and Huangquan compared to Veritas Ratio. Arlecchino needs def/hp higher than Xiao/Navia. You already castrated her by turning her from a man into a woman. Please don't ruin her. She needs at least one stat higher than every other character, like Wriothesley. Navia Caspar Zhu Hu Aura (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mihoyo this is pure torture what you did to Argenti and Huangquan compared to Veritas Ratio. Arlecchino needs def/hp higher than Xiao/Navia. You already castrated her by turning her from a man into a woman. Please don't ruin her. She needs at least one stat higher than every other character, like Wriothesley.
Talk:Allen B. DuMont

message: The Reason article cited in the external links notes that his name was actually Du Mont, not DuMont. Should the article name be changed? — Dale Arnett 03:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a redirect from "du Mont" to this article.  The spellings are fairly balanced between the two on Google, with "duMont" slightly favored.  It looks like leaving it this way should be okay, but it was an excellent question. —BozoTheScary 02:46, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Du Mont's name

message: There's some evidence (a google books search) that a Don Du Mont ran for president in 1952.  The same one, I wonder? Шизомби (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Du Mont's presidential runs 

message: I added 'commercially-viable' to 'DuMont's invention of the first long-lasting cathode ray tube would later make commercially-viable television possible' (this matches the phrase used on 'Did you know...' on 14 December 2010). Inventions which made TV possible started to be made in the 19th century. PhilUK (talk) 19:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be interesting to know what those first 1938 and 1939 televisons sold for. I remember the network, Jackie Gleason was the big star they had. I vaguely remember DuMont televisons.1archie99 (talk) 21:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television 
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 33

message: I don't know when the ymd format got decided on (I simply saw a date changed with a note on wikifying).  Yes, it has a good  reason in a computer text, but with born and died separated by em dashes and no spaces, we get a very hard to read mess.  In some cases (such as the one of Rosetta Sherwood Hall, mentioned above), an en dash was mistakenly used.  Since it began with a place of birth [See Dan East's comments above], it was really confusing. Kdammers 10:52, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth / death  

message: What is the correct way to write a person's date of birth if the day of the year is known, but not the year? For example, Person X was born January 1, sometime in the early 19th century, but the exact year is not known (this sounds weird, but it does happen). A few articles have something like "January 1, unknown" which I think is poor grammar, and others use "January 1, 18??" or "January 1, c. 1800", the latter of which I think is correct as mentioned in the DOB section, but I could use some expertise and an update to the DOB style section. —preceding unsigned comment by 130.65.240.178 (talk • contribs) 
:Good question.  I don't think it's been considered here before.  I'd say boot the day of the year and stick it in a comment, using the  tags, right next to the approximate year (noted by "c. 1800").  The reason I say this is that it makes no sense to put a more specific value without a less specific one (similar to, say, saying something is something and three-tenths of a metre long).  I'm not sure who would agree with me.
:If you take this view, though, remember to leave a comment where the exact date would be if it was known, so that if someone ever finds out, the entire date can be added straight away. Neonumbers 10:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate: Day known, but not year

message: Shouldnt large numbers direct to the number, not the year. I noticed  a few large numbers had been tried to be made a year article which is a bit ridiculous. Special:Undelete/1000000000000 Astrokey44 14:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it is, a bit, isn't it?  Tough call.  I'd imagine there'd be some strong opposition to those who manage the year pages if we tried to decide they should be numbers.  I guess it depends on whether or not there's truly something to put there. Neonumbers 06:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large numbers
Talk:Guildford (disambiguation)

message: Yesterday I edited this page to the Guildford, Surrey, BC link made more sense to me - but it has been changed back. Could someone explain to me what "Guildford is a town centre of Surrey, BC" means? it's the use of "of" that is confising me.
--Kylet 10:53, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It means it is one of six town centres that comprise the City of Surrey. town centres can be alternate commercial areas to the city's downtown. These centres are usually located within a large neighborhood and characterized by medium-high density commercial and residential property. --Kmsiever 02:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Guildford, Surrey, BC
Talk:Johor Bahru landmarks

message: Do you need to wikify each and every places? The article looks ugly with all the red links. --Haniff 23:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:ISO/IEC 11179

message: Please note that all ISO documents are copyrighted and can only be referenced according to fair use doctrine.
:Note, however, that the ISO/IEC 11179 family of standards is freely available (see links in the article).RayGates 00:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is not compliant with wikipedia standards, since it is clearly written by the authors of the standard - or somebody close to them - and in a way that is supposed to help promote the standard. I motion that then whole article be striken, until an independent author can be found. To make this point I will insert comments in the article. [[[Special:Contributions/79.136.76.102|79.136.76.102]] (talk) 09:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do NOT delete 

message: In the 2nd section "":
[quote]For example, the high-level concept "income" is combined with the object class "person" to form the data element concept "net income of person". ...[quote]
It seems:
income + person = net income of person
Why not:
income + person = income of person
?
More explanation would be needed here.
--Linforest (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A potentially confusing example 

message: The page is not maintained. The links do not work properly. I agree that the page is not very useful. Mpgch (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not maintained
Talk:Evidence under Bayes' theorem

message: This material was broken out of the article on evidence, as it is tertiary to the legal aspects of evidence. bd2412 T 00:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence and probability

message: I have untagged from the 2008 "Merge" note, at the top of the article, due to more details emerging about the concepts. This topic about evidence is too broad to be a sub-topic of the Theorem. Also, now there are more related articles, such as with "Berkeley Initiative in Soft Computing". Hence, merging is the opposite of the trend towards more separate articles. -Wikid77 (talk) 04:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Bayes theorem

message: "It teaches that the relevance of evidence that a proposition is true depends on how much the evidence changes the prior odds, and that how much it changes the prior odds depends on how likely the evidence would be found (or not) if the proposition were true."
Is this supposed to say:
"It shows the relevance of evidence that a proposition depends on and how much the evidence changes the prior odds, and that how much it changes the prior odds depends on how likely the evidence would be found (or not) if the proposition were true."
To be honest I can make neither head nor tails of the original sentence or indeed much of the article. Please make sure to use better syntax.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.169.132 (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar
Talk:Aulostomus maculatus

message: Is the length range correct on this?  I just saw one last week that was at least 4 feet (120 cm) long.
:I double checked in Reef Fish Idenfication by Humann & Deloach and they say that trumpetfish are between 1.5 and 2.5 ft (max 3ft). So we should probably increase the size indication in the article to 45-90 cm (1.5 - 3 ft). How do you know that this one was at least 4 ft? Remember that everthing looks larger underwater. Something that looks 4ft is probably more like 3ft if you would measure it. Janderk 10:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)