lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Al-Wabil al-Sayyib

message: I really am shocked at the incredible disinformation that appears in this short little article.  An endorsement of Sufism?  Are you kidding me?  Did the person who wrote this article even read the book?  I am not sure if my Arabic font will work here on Wikipedia, but i'll try my best:
ومن علامات تعظيم الامر والنهي ان لا يحمل الامر على علة تضعف الانقياد والتسليم لامر الله عز وجل بل يسلم لامر الله تعالى وحكمته ممتثلا ما امر به سواء ظهرت له حكمته او لم تظهر فان ظهرت له حكمة الشرع في امره ونهيه حمله ذلك على مزيد الانقياد والتسليم ولا يحمله ذلك على الانسلاخ منه وتركه كما حمل ذلك كثيرا من زنادقة الفقراء والمنتسبين الى التصوف فان الله عز وجل شرع الصلوات الخمس اقامة لذكره واستعمالا للقلب والجوارح واللسان في العبودية واعطاء كل منها قسطة من العبودية التي هي المقصود بخلق العبد فوضعت الصلاة على اكمل مراتب العبودي
He is actually heavily criticizing Sufis when he writes:
وتركه كما حمل ذلك كثيرا من زنادقة الفقراء والمنتسبين الى التصوف
He is accusing followers of Sufism of being heretics and people who downplay "enjoining the good".
27 كتاب الوابل الصيب، الجزء 1، صفحة .
Volume one on page 27.
To verify I had a friend of mine who is a native Arabic speaker search this book and not only was it not about Sufism, it only contained one mention of it in the whole book; and not only did it contain only one mention of it in the whole book, but it mentioned it in a negative light.  You can even see the disinformation in the supposed reference cited to support the claim, which is here:
This link is just a commercial link to a website where you can buy the book.  It also summarizes what the book is about for the potential reader, which, surprise surprise, isn't Sufism.
Further more, ibn Qayyim was known in his day as a very harsh basher of Sufism so I really don't know what the editors who put this article together were thinking.  This is absolutely unacceptable for a public encyclopedia like Wikipedia, and for the sake of the readers this has to be changed.  If anyone takes issue with what i've written here then I invite you to buy the book and look through it, preferably in the original language (get a Middle Eastern friend to help you with that), and see that what i've said here is true. MezzoMezzo 17:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shocking disinformation
Talk:John of Montfort

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara ✉ 03:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Class parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Added and edited a translation of the French wikipedia page, and removed the header notification suggesting this. Fromthemitten (talk) 02:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from French Page 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:John V, Duke of Brittany which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. –Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 03:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:The Island at the Top of the World

message: I would like to propose that Hyperion airship be merged into this article. What we have, essentially, is an article is about a vehicle in a box office bomb from 30+ years ago that is nearly as long as the article for the film it's from. PacificBoy 02:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I flew the camera ship in the Canadian Arctic scenes
FYI...I flew the camera ship for the Polar Bear and Narwhal scenes. The camera man was Bill Bacon from Squim, Washington. According to my log book, I met Bill in Resolute Bay, NWT on about July 24, 1973. On July 26, 1973 we flew 2+00 hours to Arctic Bay, NWT for staging and fuel. I logged 6+30 hours flying on July 27th, this was en-route from Arctic Bay,NWT to Admirality Inlet for the filming and returning to Resolute Bay. The Aircraft was a Bell 206B (CF-OKU) belonging to Okanagan Helicopters Ltd. A Canadian company out of Vancouver, BC, Canada with a base in Resolute. The Narwhal scenes were filmed with a 35 MM camera, but if I remember correctly Bill shot the Polar bear as an after thought and was filmed with a 16 MM camera.
Walter Lasher...    Everett, Washington W98208@Juno.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.101.53 (talk) 04:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Camera ship
Talk:Saimbeyli

message: == The French Role in the Massacre at Hadjin  ==
--82.245.112.91 (talk) 07:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: --82.245.112.91 (talk) 07:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The French Role in the Massacre at Hadjin
Talk:Javier Castellano

message: Good overall bio here: http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/222856/2017-hall-of-fame-profiles-javier-castellano  Montanabw(talk) 01:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 
Talk:Alchemical Studies

message: I have a feeling I'm the only guy in the world who read this book. I hope some people will prove me wrong and add onto this. ARBlackwood 23:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HALP!
Talk:Henry II, Duke of Lorraine

message: LouisPhilippeCharles, if you believe that Henri is the name most commonly used by English language sources to denote this Duke of Lorraine, please request a move and show us which books call him Henri. I will show which books call him Henry, we will compare the sources and conclude what the best title is. Surtsicna (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry or Henri 

message: Please see Talk:Henry III of France#Why the anglicized "Henry"? — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry versus Henri ({{lang|la|redux}})
Talk:Eadgifu of Wessex

message: It seems like it's a little over-split. Maybe just combine them into a life section unless there is any expansion? Is the first marriage that much more significant? InfernalAngel00 (talk) 04:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: Athelstan became king in 924, so she could not have gone to his court as king in 923. This needs clarification/explanation. Jal9696 (talk) 10:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The source does not say that they went to Æthelstan's court but that Louis was brought up at his court. I have corrected. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Louis I, Duke of Bourbon

message: Please do not add unsourced assertions concerning the end of male line, when 1)the statement is wrong and 2)is unsourced. Doing a little research (hint: House of Bourbon-Busset) never hurts.
*"The House of Bourbon-Busset descends in male line from Pierre de Bourbon (1464–1529), the eldest son of Louis de Bourbon, Bishop of Liège (1438–1482), who was a son of Charles I, Duke of Bourbon."
:To break it down:
*Peter I--Louis II--John I--Charles I. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter of Bourbon
Talk:Algebra i Logika

message: moved to talk RJFJR (talk) 03:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Abstracted and Indexed

message: I started filling out an 'infobox magazine' template.  The wikiproject template above already includes a request for an infobox; some people would consider a cleanup tag requesting it as well to be redundant.  RJFJR (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Charles I, Duke of Bourbon

message: Charles also had at least half a dozen bastards, most of whom he took care of rather nicely. I'll try to find my notes and add those in. --Michael K. Smith (talk) 05:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that Charles joined the League and fought against Louis xi, and so the subsequent marriage was unlikely a reward for loyalty.1f2 (talk) 21:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  War of the Public Weal
Talk:Todd Graham

message: The massive cut-and-paste job from Graham's professional bio is unencyclopedic in the extreme and should be removed or severely truncated.  65.19.76.18 01:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In invite someone to find a citation for this claim. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 08:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  nfl stint 

message: The redirect Coach Graham has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach Graham]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I've removed the following paragraph as it the accuracy is disputed and the sourcing doesn't support all of the material:
"Graham has been married twice. His first son, Bo, was born while Todd was still in high school. A subsequent marriage to Bo's mother ended after a few years. Todd Graham met Penni Jones in 1996, when Graham was the head coach at Allen High School and Johnson was the instructional technology coordinator for the Allen Independent School District. The two married in 2000. Penni had two sons (Hank and Dakota) and two daughters (Natalie and Haylee) from her previous marriage. Another son, Michael, was born in 2002."
In addition, the names and birth years for non-notable individuals should only be included if particularly relevant - see WP:BLPNAME. Any of the above can be restored subject to meeting sourcing requirements and the aforementioned WP:BLPNAME. -- Ponyobons mots 17:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph removed regarding marriage and children
Talk:Alibi Ike

message: In my opinion, this article barely makes a stub as it is, thus I don't really think we could split it into several articles. Just my opinion, any other thoughts? Eric Wester 15:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. Someone can split it when either the book or film version is expanded. Totnesmartin 20:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Split
Talk:Henri Jules, Prince of Condé

message: This article has 'Prince' capitalized.  Maybe for consistency this one should follow the same convention? --QTCaptain 03:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: A lot of unsourced edits are being uploaded rapidly to articles on French royalty. Some appear dubious, others wrong. Yet requests for reputable citations are ignored, deleted, or inadequately sourced (page numbers in books are essential to verify if the citation is accurate) -- while the wholesale editing continues. Please respond to these requests, either with reputable sources or more careful edits, before adding additional unsourced material. Also, much of the added material is redundant, excessive, or trivial. I've already recorded repeated objections to 1. unsourced allegations (e.g. that seem unprecedented, unlikely, or undocumentable) are apt to be deleted unless precisely sourced 2. redundancies (if it's in a box on the page, it's apt to be deleted from the text): 3. excess (details which belong in another person's article [e.g. parent, spouse, child], or which describe hard-to-verify details [e.g. "She felt envious": unless it's an attributed quote from a diary or correspondence -- how is it possible to know what someone who died hundreds of years ago "felt" or "thought"? Let's stick to what they verifiably said or did]), 4. gallicization (names and titles when combined, OK [but members of dynasties that ruled outside France -- Lorraine, Savoy, Modena, Bouillon, Monaco, etc -- shouldn't be gallicized, except for cadets born into a branch naturalised in France]; well-known phrases, yes; untranslatable terms, maybe; just for the sake of a more "French" sound or "feel" to the article -- not usually, and subject to deletion). Other editors will, of course, have their own views. Please don't use sockpuppets. I look forward to better mutual cooperation -- and better Wiki articles. Thanks. FactStraight (talk) 05:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant & trivial content

message: Please see Talk:Henry III of France#Why the anglicized "Henry"? — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henri versus Henry
Category talk:Philosophical theories

message: “As a point of fact there is only one universal Soul and we all share that Soul and that
Soul is supremely good. This soul is the ultimate singularity.”  says Krishnapada Das
Papaji, author of The
Ultimate Singularity: 
This is a facinating theory which also poses the possiblity that perhaps we are god. Like one giant being, and all of us seperated and elongated like fingers froma hand. 
Tying into this theory is also the concept of time, and subconscious future-memory retention, such as exhibited in the classic science fiction novel "Childhoods end" by Sir Arthur C. Clarke, originally published in 1953.
24.236.246.174 18:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  point of fact 

message: It has come to my attention that "philosophical theories" while a good beginning for organizing material, has its issues also. I think the main distinction this category is trying to make from others is "scientific" and "non-scientific" theories. I think we should rename this category "Non-empirical theories". Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 01:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal
Talk:Fulk I, Count of Anjou

message: Does anyone have a source for Fulk's death? I look on the Encyclopedia Britannica and it said he died and ended his reign in 942, not 941. Zsd1791 00:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fulk's Death 

message: This looks to be missing a digit, since he probably did not start his reign in 90 AD.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.178.190 (talk) 12:28, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Range for Count of Nantes
Talk:Geoffrey I, Count of Anjou

message: I thought the control of Touraine was transfered to Anjou only during the 11th century under Thibaud III of Blois and Geoffrey II of Anjou. Therefore Touraine should not be within the boundaries of Anjou, same for Vendôme. Besides, I think there should be a line marking the separation between what was the frankish principalities and what was not (i.e Brittany/Francia as underlined by Everard and Hallam). 
Best regards Maeldan (talk) 23:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map historically accurate ?
Talk:1269 Cilicia earthquake

message: I've just come across a source that describes a major earthquake in Cilicia in 1269 with a lot more detail than any of the sources for the 1268 date. It's in the CFTI5MED catalogue. Perhaps critically for the recent earthquakes, only 8,000 deaths are attributed. As I'm away I won't update the article until my return later this month.  Mikenorton (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, things got in the way and I forgot all about this, but working on the 1511 Idrija earthquake jogged my memory. I've added a "Tectonic setting" section and will work on a "Damage" section over the next few days. Mikenorton (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: 1269?
Talk:Louis Charles, Count of Beaujolais

message: I find this article completely appropriate. There are many articles on Wikipedia of people lesser than the article's subject. BoBo (talk) 01:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Appropriateness

message: A lot of unsourced edits are being uploaded rapidly to articles on French royalty. Some appear dubious, others wrong. Yet requests for reputable citations are ignored, deleted, or inadequately sourced (page numbers in books are essential to verify if the citation is accurate) -- while the wholesale editing continues. Please respond to these requests, either with reputable sources or more careful edits, before adding additional unsourced material. Also, much of the added material is redundant, excessive, or trivial. I've already recorded repeated objections to 1. unsourced allegations (e.g. that seem unprecedented, unlikely, or undocumentable) are apt to be deleted unless precisely sourced 2. redundancies (if it's in a box on the page, it's apt to be deleted from the text): 3. excess (details which belong in another person's article [e.g. parent, spouse, child], or which describe hard-to-verify details [e.g. "She felt envious": unless it's an attributed quote from a diary or correspondence -- how is it possible to know what someone who died hundreds of years ago "felt" or "thought"? Let's stick to what they verifiably said or did]), 4. gallicization (names and titles when combined, OK [but members of dynasties that ruled outside France -- Lorraine, Savoy, Modena, Bouillon, Monaco, etc -- shouldn't be gallicized, except for cadets born into a branch naturalised in France]; well-known phrases, yes; untranslatable terms, maybe; just for the sake of a more "French" sound or "feel" to the article -- not usually, and subject to deletion). Other editors will, of course, have their own views. Please don't use sockpuppets. I look forward to better mutual cooperation -- and better Wiki articles. Thanks. FactStraight (talk) 05:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant & trivial content
Talk:Alfonso II, Count of Provence

message: I found this in family research I'm doing. Noles1984 19:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfonso's place of death 

message: Alfonso's wife is listed as Gersinda II of Sabran. My family research shows her name also appears as Gersenda de Sabran and to verify this their son, Ramon Berenguer IV, appears as that in the article and my history. Noles1984 19:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfonso's wife 

message: You say that Peter was born in 1178 and Alfonso was born in 1174 making him the oldest son and NOT the second.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.116.132 (talk) 19:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second or First son of Alfonso II 

message: Hmm.. most male statues do not have breasts.  Maybe this is his wife Gersenda instead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.116.132 (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo or Image of Alfonso
Talk:Arshak II

message: Why does this article include a fragment of a letter from Vagharshak (I or II?) to Arshak (presumably one of the Parthian Arcasids of that name)? It doesn’t seem to have anything to do with this Arshak, and anyway is just a salutation with no content... —benadhem (talk) 16:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The letter of Vagharshak
Talk:Claude de l'Aubespine, baron de Châteauneuf

message: ok, i'm going to move the content from Claude de l'Aubespine to here and redirect, but that is the better name for the article. Pohick2 (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Still seems to a duplicate at Claude II de l'Aubespine.Unoquha (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate articles
Talk:Emmanuel de Rohan-Polduc

message: Mark:  please insert a link, if possible, to what you have written on the Codice - not a link to your personal article.  --Wikiain (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codice link 
Talk:François de Beaumont, baron des Adrets

message: *Looks like these are the same person. Danrok (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[François de Beaumont]] 

message: I tagged the one item in "Further Reading". I know I didn't use the right template or tag, because there is none that covers the situation. An unpublished thesis is recommended for further reading. No bibliographical information is given. I have searched the author and title in various ways through Google, and Google Books, and come up with nothing, except this article and its clones. How can one read it if one cannot find it? I notice that the author is a "Fr. Sean O'Driscoll". I would like to know whether Father O'Driscoll is neutral and objective, or partisan.  I considered tagging it as "self-published", but that doesn't quite fit.
Since it is an incomplete reference, and is stated to be unpublished, I recommend deleting it.
--Vicedomino (talk) 07:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Reading
Talk:Walter III, Count of Brienne

message: In the lead of this article, Walter III's date of death was stated as 14 June 1205. Near the end of the article, it says "Walter died of his wounds soon afterwards,[7] on 11 June 1205.[11]" So, when did Walter III die? 11 or 14? Was he mortally wounded on the 11th, dying eventually on the 14th? Or was one of the dates wrong? Please clarify. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 23:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither Perry or Mitchell give 11th or 14th of June as the date of his death. Mitchell states Walter was assassinated in June 1205. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Kansas Bear, for checking and removing the iffy dates from the article so quickly. --PFHLai (talk) 23:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death: June 11th or 14th?
Talk:Voiceworks (magazine)

message: I have tried to improve this page in the hope of having it status as advertising removed. Hopefully the links I've added will also lend themselves to this article's verifiability. Do I need to contact an admin person about this to have the status removed? --Wiki apprentice (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising status and verifiability 
Talk:Caroline Bonaparte

message: I removed this sentence because it made no sense.  It says "The birth of the future Napoleon II to her brother and Marie Louise destroyed any hope of her son Napoléon Achille Murat succeeding her brother."...When did he ever have any hope of succeeding Napoleon in France.  She had four brothers and two elder sister that would have been ahead of her in succession and the Bonaparte monarchy followed the salic law of succession that prohibits female-lines to succeed to the throne.  --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 01:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious sentence 

message: The best portrait of Caroline I have managed to find is found here.  It is a heavily cropped version of this JPEG image.  The painting is too old to have any copyright.  If it originally had any it has long expired by now.
2010-12-29  Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.
:Have you a source that says it's a portrait of Caroline?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait 

message: You might be interested in this
Genealogical Relationship of President George Washington & Maria Annunziata Carolina Bonaparte (Caroline Bonaparte)
https://picasaweb.google.com/Shieldwolf2012/Charts?authkey=Gv1sRgCMje7p32nffBqAE#5654845055928863138  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shieldwolf (talk • contribs) 16:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy 

message: Wikimedia Commons has this portrait which is said to depict Caroline.  However, it is considerably different from all other portraits of her I have seen.  Most important, it depicts a woman with brown eyes.  All other portraits showing Caroline's eye colour depicts her with light eyes.  (They were probably blue-gray as those of her brother Napoléon.)  I see no reason why someone would be portrayed with an entirely different eye colour.  Could the painting be the misidentified portrait of her sister Pauline?  Except for nose length the face closely matches this portrait of her.
2014-02-01 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.
== Marriage in 1830 ==
Any information in english language sources about her marrying an Italian of Scottish ancestry? Former Minister of War to Murat.
 
:it:Francesco Macdonald
Keith H99 (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misidentified portrait? 

message: Any information in english language sources about her marrying an Italian of Scottish ancestry? Former Minister of War to Murat.
 
:it:Francesco Macdonald
Keith H99 (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage in 1830