lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Katharina Kepler

message: how can she be 14 months in jail between Summer 1620 and October 1620? -- Hartmann Schedel  Prost  21:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 4.5 years later; dates in this article are still not in agreement with those in the Leonberg article. Neither cites a reference. Maybe the 2005 book "Kepler's Witch: An Astronomer's Discovery of Cosmic Order Amid Religious War, Political Intrigue, and the Heresy Trial of His Mother" (ISBN-10: 0060750499) would help. Twang (talk) 07:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 Months 

message: https://www.amazon.com/Astronomer-Witch-Johannes-Keplers-Mother/dp/0198736770
"The Astronomer and the Witch".
Rublack is celebrated female German historian. Richard Gill (talk) 08:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another great book: by Ulinka Rublack
Talk:Wright Model A

message: is there a documented range for the Wright Military Flyer?--50.78.66.138 (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: There's no reference at present to launch mechanism used for the Model A - a somewhat fundamental element of a practical aircraft. The 1908 flight log for records set at Camp d'Auvours ( https://www.centennialofflight.net/chrono/log/1908CampdAuvours.htm ) makes scant mention of the catapult but elsewhere ( https://wrightstories.com/wilbur-at-camp-dauvours/ ) we have notes such as "Later, the French must have reconsidered Wilbur’s use of the catapult launching and decided it gave him an advantage. The Aero-Club de France announced an altitude competition that contained a restriction on the use of a catapult in a disguised attempt to handicap Wilbur. He won the prize anyway on November 23 by employing an extra long launching rail that enabled him to dispense with the catapult." (typo somewhere as Nov 23, 1908 is not in the "flight log"). Harami2000 (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Launch Mechanism
Talk:NBA Live 08

message: This section sounds like an advertisement. Louis waweru 09:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Features 

message: Hello. I've got a question. I'll know, is there Serbia national basketball team in the game for the new World Championship? Can somebody make a chart with all national basketball teams. Thank you. 19:27, 14th January 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.226.132.134 (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National teams 

message: should mention this? --72.73.87.76 (talk) 06:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  online? 
Talk:List of Will & Grace characters

message: I've just merged info from the main W&G article and the 'List of W&G guest stars' article, so there is bound to be some repetition. Please feel free to edit as you see fit. --Pisceandreams (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Merge

message: Hi
There appear to be a number of areas where the text makes it seem as if there were real world events; e.g. "In November 2002, Grace and Leo were married at a spontaneous group ceremony in Central Park, which was supposed to be broadcast on The Today Show" and "Karen fell in love with him in the 1980s but they didn't marry until 1995" Chaosdruid (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-Universe
Talk:International Public Debate Association

message: Hello, I'm posting this to ask if editors of IPDA could use some of their sources and citations to improve the summary section of this article's IPDA section. Thanks, Dr Crazy 102 (talk) 13:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Debate_(competitive)#International_Public_Debate_Association]] currently reads as [[WP:PROMOTION]]: Can some editors please chuck some sources and citations onto the summary? 
Talk:The Harvey School

message: In the next 3 or 4 days this school COULD be on the front page of wikipedia. To get there I would need to edit the article to remove bias. Is this OK? Where did all this stuff come from? Victuallers 18:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article could probably be a GA or FA if the sources are tagged and some of the rah-rah is removed. This appears to be this editor's first submission. Spryde 18:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is my first submission. I worked with the school on that article. The admissions group pulled it together for me.--Numont 21:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Sure. What can I do (Haven't done a DYK yet...) Spryde 20:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: offer

message: Hi Spryde and Numont. This article is quite close as I have said.
Main problems are
#lack of references... I have added one about the techer ratio to show how its done
#a bit of "rah rah".... the article is pretty good.... but need to have refs when ..you say you are "highly regarded" ... by who ? ... (Note this is an exageration of something the article does a bit.
:thats it. Need to search Google .... especially Google books and find some sources. Numont may have access to books etc and pamphlets. If we can add a few refs in the next two hours then I'll put it up for "Did you know" Victuallers 20:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm here!--Numont 21:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great... does the stuff above make sense? Can you handle the refs?Victuallers 21:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I need to read up on refs (the conventions, etc.), then do a Google search. I will do it in the next two hours.  Do you have the location handy about references on Wikipedia? --Numont 21:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi that makes three

message: *this happens. You have to look at the source to see it happen.
OR
add a list below of the refs you have used to date. Where did your stuff come from Victuallers 21:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: it came from the Admissions Director at Harvey. btw - I just added a reference - the second one where Miner goes off and starts a new school. Is it done right?--Numont 21:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Nice... Spryde 11:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: So the article is up to start standard. It can get a lot better. If you want to go further then try the schools project ... they can help. Good luck Victuallers 10:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: more?
Talk:Jean Godden

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "multiple" :
** Seattle City Council Website http://www.seattle.gov/council/godden/
** fgfg
DumZiBoT (talk) 02:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: The claim that her family moved 116 times before she graduated from high school seems difficult to believe, and should be supported by citation. I've replaced it with the loser "many times" pending documentation.rewinn (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 116 Moves?
Talk:Sports sedan

message: This article seems to attract more pictures than text. The "sports sedan" term is undefined and subjective. The link to Commons has many more images. CZmarlin (talk) 02:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: The following excerpt sounds like something that one would read in promotional material: "offering the motorist more connection with the driving experience".  What does this even mean?  It seems purposefully vague, and since precision is something that I believe is valued on wikipedia, might I suggest this sentence be rewritten. Tominrochester (talk) 02:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising or wikipedia? 
Talk:Nodena site

message: I just significantly expanded this article, adding sections about the site, descriptions, sections about the artifacts and culture of the Nodena people, illustrations, and condesnsing the multiple references to Dr. hampson, the museum and the mastodon, which all have their own articles and don't need to be mentioned 5 or 6 times apiece. Any thoughts on how it's looking? Heironymous Rowe (talk) 07:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks alright! Good work! Always nice to have some competent additions made. You wrote that there is a museum at the Nodena site. As far as I have heard the site is on private property and destroyed and the artifacts are in the Hampson Museum in Wilson. (1) Is there a second museum at the site itself? (2) And - in case you have been there - is there access to the site or former site of the village? If so, is there anything worth looking at? (3) Have you been to the Hampson museum? I am asking because I wonder where the bones of the Island 35 Mastodon (partial pelvis and femur) might be on display if they are. I have recently been to the Tipton County Museum as the mastodon was found in Tipton County, they have some mastodon bones but those were found some place else. My questions are more out of personal interest in the site, not so much to question material from the article. Thanks a lot and take care, doxTxob \ talk 18:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! As for the museum, it is in Wilson and not actually at the site, I guess I need to reword that, I didn't mean to imply it was at the site. I don't think the site is open to the public, not real sure. I know the mounds that used to be there up to a hundred years ago, have been nearly flattened by farming since then, but I believe it is now protected, not sure. I stopped there(Hampson Museum) 2 years ago while on a trip to visit my daughter for Xmas. It was a day or 2 before Xmas, so I only spent and hour or so at the museum. I don't remember there being a mastadon on display, but the collection of pottery and other artifacts is very nice. I posted a few of the pics in my re-write of the article, although the 2 I used are just a drop in the bucket, they are worth going there to see. I believe they are planning on building a new, much nicer, bigger museum, sometime in the next 2 or 3 years. As for the mastadon, it coulda been there, I just may not've noticed. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 19:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I have checked the article against the B-class criteria today and found that only a few updates and fixes were needed. I have fixed the few things that needed fixing and have updated the rating to B-class. Very good work, this is an exciting article to read! doxTxob \ talk 07:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality
Talk:Ricardo Cabllero Tostado

message: I need to link this page to Latin American Idol second season; Ricardo Caballero Tostado is one of the current contestants but I am having problems linking it. ~~Elizabeth~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabethow (talk • contribs) 
:Well, first of all, the article should mention him being a contestant, as that's an assertion of notability which would mean it won't be deleted immediately. :) To link to it, all you have to do is put two square brackets around the words that form the name of the article, like this: Latin American Idol. Also, it will help that article to link back here if this article's name is properly capitalized. I'll go ahead and make those changes, and remove my deletion nomination. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 18:37, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of historical unrecognized states and dependencies

message: Now that is has been disestablished, should we add the Catalan Republic (2017) to this list? LoneWolf1992 (talk) 4:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalan Republic  

message: This is listed at Asia: Executive Committee of the Soviet of Workers, Soldiers, and the Landless in Latvia.
Maybe it should be at Europe. Medvexxx (talk) 01:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asia or Europe 

message: This section seems far too verbose when compared to the other states on this list. Perhaps someone more familiar than me with editing can trim it down a little? AlisterSinclair (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provisional Revolutionary Government of Cibao section is too long 

message: It seems misleading to say that the Vermont Republic became the State of Vermont. During the 14 years of independence of Vermont, it was occasionally referred to as the Vermont Republic, and that term might be considered one of the official names for it since it appeared on coins, but in its constitution and for most official purposes it was called the State of Vermont, and moreover, when it was admitted to the Union as the 14th state, it did not acquire a new state constitution or a new governor or other new officers of the state. Rather the Constitution of the State of Vermont that had been in force since 1786 (which had superseded the 1777 constitution) continued in effect, and the governor of the State of Vermont whose term under that constitution had begun almost five months earlier continued with that term of office under the same constitution and laws as before, and likewise other officers of the state. And the act of Congress that admitted the state of Vermont said that the entity that had asked them for admission was "the State of Vermont." So what happened was not that something became something, but rather that the status of something changed (in an important way).
: 
So the question is: How should the terse statements here be phrased consistently with that while remaining suitably terse? Michael Hardy (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . . . and now I've rephrased it by changing "Became the State of Vermont" to "Admitted to the Union as the State of Vermont, after a compromise ended its jurisdictional disputes with New York." Michael Hardy (talk) 18:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vermont
Talk:Phi Beta Chi

message: winter/spring of 1982.
i was a pledge trainer for delta chi at purdue and we took the pledges to eastern illinois for the weekend.
saturday evening ended up hanging out with phi beta chi's original initiation class unexpectedly at a "dance bar".  what validates this the initiation services were attended by the beta members from the purdue chapter.
it was cold outside, so i would say february or march.
karen williams, karen p. from purdue.  others not there but could validate connie schussler, debbie smith, betsy lehming. 2603:900A:1600:C4E3:F4CC:41A4:C663:4A53 (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  eastern illinois start date
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gumtree

message: [edit] Non-administrators closing discussions
Shortcut:
WP:DPR#NAC 
In general, administrators are responsible for closing discussions about deletions. However, at times the various deletion discussions become backlogged. Editors in good-standing who have not been made administrators may close deletion discussions, with the following provisions:
Deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with consensus and taking account of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you are not familiar with deletion policy or the workings of deletion discussions, it is best that you only close discussions with unambiguous results. 
Non-administrators should not close even unanimous "delete" decisions, as they lack the technical ability to delete pages. 
In cases when an administrator has deleted a page and overlooks closing the discussion, their name and deletion summary should be included in the closing rationale. 
Closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion or for a page that you have edited heavily presents a conflict of interest and should be avoided. The sole exception is if you are closing your own withdrawn nomination as a speedy keep and all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well. 
I rest my case - this should have been allowed to run - but somebody must be blind - gumtree IS PART ODF EBAY - MERGE IT!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bananabean cs (talk • contribs) 
:Paypal is also part of ebay... perhaps we should merge that as well? When closing the AfD I invoked Use Common Sense which allows me to temporarily ignore all the rules Fosnez 20:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Insanity Wave

message: Here are some references of the band:
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/music/reviews/19872/insanitywave-minor/ 
http://www.microearth.com/fidelitorium/ 
http://fiberfib.com/es/cartel/flashback/fib-2000/ 
http://www.atiza.com/festivales/serie-b/default.htm 
http://www.peermusic.com/artistpage/Insanity_Wave.html
Escrignacarlita 18:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sigma Delta Phi

message: What is the relation with the UP Sigma Delta Phi which claims it has been founded and organized by US Sigma Delta Phi and designated as Zeta chapter? see this page: http://www.sigmadeltaphi.com/about.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redberger (talk • contribs) 03:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, the SigmaDeltaPhi link referenced in this question is bad. Jax MN (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt there is any connection.  The "UP" Sigma Delta Phi in the original question refers to the University of the Philippines.  That group doesn't appear to have any connection with the local sorority at Grove City College in Pennsylvania, in the US. Jax MN (talk) 22:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Related group in the Philippines?
Talk:River Poddle

message: Are articles possible on the City Watercourse, Colman's Brook, etc.
And on other small Dublin rivers, such as The Swan, The Wad and The Steyne (the one under Stephen's Green)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.123.122.161 (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related watercourses 

message: Is there a plaque or information to mark the confluence point and rigid of ‘Dublin’?WisDom-UK (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, sadly. A set of Poddle markers has been discussed once or twice, from western Tallaght through Tymon Park, Kimmage, Mount Argus and so on, but for now, not even a little plaque at the outfall - or, even more usefully, opposite it. SeoR (talk) 16:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Yes. But with the clarification of "origin" above, some good news - the Black Pool, Dubh Linn, which lay outside the then walls of Dublin Castle, is commemorated with a circular garden and plaque inside the modern castle walls. SeoR (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plaque at confluence? 

message: More about the Abbey that twisted the river?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.220.236.3 (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I can address this from existing and next source. It was, by the by, the Abbey of St Thomas, south of Thomas St., which was named for it. SeoR (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbey
Talk:Clyde Road

message: Non-notable road. See discussion.--Balloholic (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 
Talk:Shelbourne Road

message: A suggestion to change the name of this article to Shelbourne Road since the article makes clear that Shelbourne as an area doesn't really exist.  I believe an article on what does exist is more appropriate.  Thoughts? --HighKing (talk) 01:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:Philodemic Society

message: Would it be appropriate to add a brief history/intro/backdrop to literary societies in the us--college literary societies--as they existed and began in the first half of the 20th century?
Philomathean Literary Society (Erskine College) is an example of a page that does so.
Jx242 (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  add history of literary societes? 

message: I have removed that section completely. Such lists are completely inappropriate. The names of private persons, not notable in themselves, with no independent references, and labelled "current" (a meaningless construct) do not belong in the article. This trivia is of interest solely to members of the society, several of whom are clearly editing this article. This is an encyclopedia article, not an extension of your web site. Please stop using it as such. Voceditenore (talk) 08:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Current Officer Corps" removed 

message: The author of an obscure book on rowing blazers and recently launched novelty clothes line does not belong in a list with Justices Scalia and White.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.167.154 (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Individual?
Talk:University of St Andrews Union Debating Society

message: The entire section on traditions in this article is very poor and needs to be looked at by someone with the knowledge of the Society. It has serious issues meeting Wikipedia's style guidelines, and has serious issues with Wikipedia:NPOV. Can anyone provide assistance to salvage what true/useful information is in the section? Otherwise, I'm just going to erase that section entirely. Riskbreaker2987 (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - I think the whole section should go as NPOV unless some one without WP:COI can do this.  Codf1977 (talk) 21:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  well nothing Debaters like more than Debate - but this is an Encyclopaedia, so if it is not verifiable then I am removing it - any one feel free to added it back if they can support by an independent reliable source. Codf1977 (talk) 12:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Traditions"

message: I think this article needs a bit of a re-write, to bring it more in line with wikipedia's quality guidelines and better articles within WikiProject Debating like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Historical_Society (although I am aware this article is itself somewhat flawed)
So I propose merging the historical sections into one more concise and encyclopeadic section, removing content that cannot be verified by third party sources and formatting the presidents list more like an actual wikipedia list, also adding a section about notable alumni, and notable speakers. I would appreciate any comments/help/sources.
Xyphoid (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 

message: This page currently states that the Society was formed in 1794, however, the website clearly states that 1794 marked the foundation of the precursor society, the Literary Society. It's actual foundation was in 1890 when the Literary and Classical Society merged to form the new Debating Society.
This also calls into question the veracity of the claim that it is the UK's oldest debating society, the Cambridge Union Society was established in 1815.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cantab12 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Establishment Date 