lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Admiral of the fleet

message: The illustrative table is missing the ranks of:
Vice Admiral -- Lieutenant General
Rear Admiral -- Brigadier/Major General
Moryak (talk) 14:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing ranks in table

message: Do some nations use the rank even in PEACE time?
-G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 16:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacetime?

message: While I see that this is a dab page, IMO all the 5-star admiral pages should link to a generic article like "5-star admiral" or "Grand admiral" (caps deliberate). Then the specific country articles can be titled "Admiral of the Fleet (UK)" or "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union" etc. That said, practice should follow established usage in historical and military texts, not just anglophone. 118.90.35.155 (talk) 04:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generic title 

message: If I might add..
In the Malaysian and Indonesian navies, the rank laksamana is a '4 star rank'. In theory, it should be available in the Royal Brunei Navy, although none has been conferred..
The equivalent '5 star rank' in the Royal Malaysian Navy is 'Laksamana Armada' which means 'Admiral of the Fleet', and has only been conferred to members of the royal families..
The 'five star rank' in the Indonesian Navy, is 'Laksamana Besar' which means 'Grand Admiral'..
200.68.87.133 (talk) 19:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laksamana
Talk:Admiralty

message: Further discussion about the implications of the move of this disambiguation page is at Talk:British Admiralty, which is the article previously located at Admiralty - Dumelow (talk) 10:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing discussion about January 2021 move
Talk:Hellabrunn Zoo

message: Sorry, there is no way this is a B -- not even a C by my standards until it gets some citations (then it will be a C). It doesn't even have an infobox (I will put that in right now). I am de-rating to start-class until there are at least some citations. Don Lammers (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Sandstein

message: User:Sandstein
Category talk:	2
Category:	7
Image talk:	1
Image:	19
Mainspace	3426
Portal:	5
Talk:	194
Template talk:	32
Template:	27
User talk:	706
User:	142
Wikipedia talk:	51
Wikipedia:	2474
avg edits per article	1.51
earliest	12:34, 31 July 2005
number of unique articles	4700
total	7086
Sandstein's editcount summary stats as of 21:12, November 23rd 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 21:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Adorno (surname)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Either a malformed request or wrong venue. If the proposed move was intended to be Adorno (surname) to Adorno, that discussion can be reopened at any time at Talk:Adorno (surname). If the intent was simply to discuss the redirect in general, that should be taken at RfD. (closed by non-admin page mover) estar8806 (talk) ★ 18:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Adorno →  – Now Adorno is a redirect to Theodor W. Adorno, but the Adorno family, with a number of Doge of Genoa it's also important. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 10:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

text: @MrKeefeJohn did you mean to open a move discussion with a nomination to move Adorno (surname) to ? – robertsky (talk) 11:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the redirect Adorno to Theodor W. Adorno it's not the best solution. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 11:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If your aim is to change the redirect target, I believe the correct venue would be WP:Redirects for discussion instead of requesting a move. BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Last time I asked it for Tiro, you can check it in Talk:Tiro, and it was ok, it's wasn't the first time. Anyway if the rules are different, I will ask it again. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 12:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, I understand now you indeed wanted to move Adorno (surname) →  as robertsky suggested above. Note that you've accidentally requested the reverse. The easiest solution might be to move this whole section to Talk:Adorno (surname), or you can start a new request there. BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 November 2023
Talk:List of United States Coast Guard cutters

message: There is also the 95 foot Cape class of cutters that need to be added. Anybody have a list?  The only one that I can name off hand is 95326  CApe Corwin, which was based in Honolulu Harbor.
68.61.35.13 23:31, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  95 foot Cape class 

message: Fir (Coast Guard cutter) is a U.S. National Historic Landmark which I can't place on this article's list.  I am working in WP:NRHP;  I don't know from ships.  Can someone identify it and link it in here.  Your improving the Fir article too would be appreciated. doncram 06:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: USCGC Fir

message: As the only tall ship in the USCG and only 1 of 2 in the United States military, and as the flagship of the Coast Guard, and former flagship of the Kriegsmarine in WWII, it should be shown. vchapman 10:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added USCGC Eagle Photo from Eagle Page 

message: Is she listed, and I did not see it, or perhaps it is not supposed to be on this list. Also what about the 1919 USS Yocona and Kankakee?  Please let me know before I mess up your page. --Paul, in Saudi (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Sea Cloud|USS ''Sea Cloud?'']]

message: The page includes the quote "It is sorted by length down to 65', the minimum length of a USCG cutter."  Where can I find a source for this number?  It may be common knowledge, but it should be written down somewhere. SandyJax (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , There are later editions of The Coast Guardsman's Manual but they could have a different page number. Cuprum17 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split between boats and ships?
Talk:Basseterre

message: The picture looks the same as Basse-terre in Guadeloupe. See discussion on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Basseterre.jpeg . Any can confirm if the picture is really Basseterre (or not) ?? -Pierro78 (talk) 15:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture ? 

message: Hii did u get ur presets? 2601:547:1003:8040:A155:98D2:C7E3:75EF (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas 

message: Said 2601:2C3:4200:81C0:9978:4DB8:F95E:6FE (talk) 01:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sox
Talk:Bangui

message: From 1976 to 1979, Bangui was the seat of an Empire! This great city holds the same status in the world that places like Beijing, Tokyo, Vienna, Delhi, Paris, Moscow and London hold. Why is there no mention of Bangui's glorious history and its Imperial heritage? Even the article on Timbuktu mentions that city's past Imperial glories in the second paragraph. All the Bangui article talks about is stuff like strife and poverty and civil war. Give this Imperial City its due... 71.52.130.192 (talk) 14:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's not forget Rome, Mexico City (back when it was still Tenochtitlan), Istanbul, Berlin, and even Stockholm. Bangui is in some amazing company. 76.6.20.64 (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it was an Imperial City. So were Memphis, Egypt, Karakorum, Teotihuacan, and Angkor Wat. Get the idea here? 173.94.157.34 (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Bangui is an Imperial City! This doesn't do it justice!

message: Ezabolo (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  KM5 is the most popular neighborhood in Bangui 

message: fun times in the sun 2601:85:8200:B8D0:1989:1F2B:6EEB:D0C2 (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  school
Talk:Aegis (disambiguation)

message: I NEED TO NO WHAT THE WORD MUAIN MEENING.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.121.157.130 (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Would there be a straightforward way to make it obvious that Apollo Computer *doesn't* refer to the Apollo Guidance Computer in any way whatsoever, but rather a corporation founded later that had nothing to do with it? The link made me curious, and it wasn't until I read some of the article that it was obvious that it referred to something else. --FIQ (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apollo Computer confusion
Talk:Massacre at Thandikulam

message: This is Wikipedia. Please bare (this)in you mind when you edit here.Thanks Iwazaki  会話。討論 06:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. No need to bring up OR and weasel wording then Iwazaki. If you can provide reference saying that "This massacre happened when the ltte blew up the truck" (implying that the LTTE did this) rather than "Army shot students close range" you can add that to the article. Keep in mind that the former is added below and has no need to be in the main paragraph. Also I suggest you read WP:NPA thank you  Watchdogb 22:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the tamil   nation/net/com/org/co.uk/ne.jp editor  
Talk:German submarine UA (1939)

message: I think the contents of this article should be merged into the Foreign U-Boats page. - Adrian M. H. 21:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, every other U-Boat has Her own article (see List of U-boats); Foreign U-Boats should be no different. --Bryson 22:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: The Foreign U-Boats were fashioned from captured submarines of other countries...'
: Turkey was a neutral country. How was this ship captured? --Explendido Rocha 14:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this the boat was built in Germany 1938-1939 as "Batiray", but taken into German service on 21 Sept, 1939.Drutt (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Capture?

message: Is the correct designation UA or U-A? ie. had there been another Turkish sub in German service, would it have been UA-2 or U-B, or something else? Drutt (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I see, according to Foreign U-Boats U-B refers to British boats, so a second Turkish vessel would be U-A2.Drutt (talk) 13:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedantic Point

message: There was apparently another boat named UA (or U-A) in WWI which was "stranded on Voorne Island, off Hellevoetsluis, 13th March, 1917, interned by Dutch government, and surrendered at Harwich, 25th February, 1919". Drutt (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UA in WWI
Talk:Affirmation

message: The last bullet item currently (4/23/08) on the page reads: 
:* "Affirmation" also has various meanings within the domains of personal development, popular psychology, alternative health and supplicatory prayer. 
This text is not helpful to the disambiguation page for several reasons:
# provides no links to any relevant articles.  
# groups too many separate topics into a single line.
# uses vague term "various meanings" providing no help for the reader. 
# uses possibly derisive term "popular psychology" (pop psychology) instead of simply "psychology".
# uses possibly derisive term "alternative health" instead of simply "health".
# uses erroneous term "supplicatory prayer" instead of simply "prayer".
:: supplication (begging/humbling) is contradictory to any concept of affirmation (claiming/asserting).
These disambiguations do need to be included, but this bullet item as currently written needs to be expanded into several valid and NPOV disambiguation links. -- Low Sea (talk) 08:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you should look at the article Affirmation before someone turned it into a redirect.  It was a clutter of unsourced ideas. If there were reliably-sourced WP articles for these ideas, then proper disambiguation would be possible. Perhaps you could start with a good article on Affirmation in Prayer? Vernon White . . . Talk  22:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been slowly (as time permits) working on an article for "Affirmative Prayer". Long way to go. The hard part is finding non-primary sources for the subject matter. Most secondary sources only contain discussions on prayer-in-general with not enough detail on the difference of this particular form of prayer. <P> In the meantime I have removed the problematic terminology (bullets 4,5,6 above). -- Low Sea (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your help. Vernon White . . . Talk  19:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last item needs improvement
Talk:Lower Falls

message: No credit to orignal site? http://www.yellowstone.net/waterfalls/lowerfalls.htm
bigbrd222 21:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lower Falls has been redirected and elements merged into Yellowstone Falls
--Mike Cline (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower Falls Redirected and Merged
Talk:Affliction

message: I think some of my changes may have been too drastic, but a majority make sense according to WP:MOSDAB.  The goal of the page is to get quickly to the information people are looking for.  Please let me know what you object to! (John User:Jwy talk) 21:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've unlinked it.  We don't really have an article on it.  Maybe "suffering" should be linked there?  I'm in the process of cleaning up links to this page.  There should be few if any. (John User:Jwy talk) 23:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Oh, read much to quickly.  You might be correct about having the link here as well, but the links should still go directly to "suffering" where appropriate. (John User:Jwy talk) 00:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Style changes
Talk:Ashgabat

message: I corected the assurde statement of that temperature can easily reach 50C for long period of time.
In fact, Ashkhabad NEVER recorded nor approached 50C (absolute record 46.7C).
50C was only recorded at Repetek Reserve in July 1983, not at Askhabad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.10.36.217 (talk) 15:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it really as cold as Mongolia in the winter? I find that a little bit hard to believe 1007Conradical (talk) 13:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate 

message: I was looking at the flag wiki, and saw that ashgabat has a new logo, created in 2016. I was wondering if it is official, as flag wiki isn't very reliable. 71.120.197.222 (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Slip

message: Slip is used when trying to stick two or more peices of clay together.
Slip is made from just clay and water and acts as a stronge glue to stick clay together.
--Luna5000 21:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The word's use in ceramics is already listed in the article.--Shantavira 14:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clay
Talk:Afghani

message: Anyone who is trying to remove Afghanistani should have a good explanation because Afghanistani is sourced and is accepted by Wikipedia.--Inuit18 (talk) 07:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The word Afghanistan is redirected to Demography of Afghanistan. There is no such thing as Afghanistan in wikipedia.   (Ketabtoon (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean there is no Afghanistan[i]. That's correct, it is a word used by error in some places by people unfamiliar with Afghanistan, and the dictionary.com uses it to explain that Afghanistani is "suppose" to mean what they say it does. Dictionary.com only tries to help people understand what the word is trying to explain.--119.73.6.136 (talk) 02:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afghanistani 

message: رمضان كريم على الجميع  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.114.176.54 (talk) 20:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  كل عام والجميع بالف خير وعافية
Talk:David Cohen

message: David L. Cohen, Esq. is a Vice President of Comcast, and not related to the late Councilman at Large David Cohen in Philadelphia.  Comcast is headquartered in Philadelphia, and David L. Cohen has been quite active in Philadelphia Democratic politics.  
As a newbie, I am not sure about how to add this material.
Dct2328 21:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For future reference, items removed from dab page:
* David Cohen, Scottish studio potter noted for saltglazed stonewares
* David Cohen (jockey), a Thoroughbred horse race jockey
* David Cohen, an alias used by American businessman Eddie Antar who fled the U.S. to avoid being prosecuted for pilfering millions of dollars from his now defunct Crazy Eddie electronics empire
--ShelfSkewed Talk 06:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries not supported by linked pages
Talk:Princess of Pop

message: Can't have your cake and eat it too.  Kylie Minogue should NEVER be called the Princess of Pop before someone like Britney Spears, who so obviously carries the title.  You're obsession with Kylie Minogue has officially gone too far.  It is when you start to put your own ideas and bias information into wikipedia that it no longer becomes an online encyclopedia and rather a blog of personal opinions. 24.215.19.155 21:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Air shower (physics)

message: The current WP article doesn't report the Order of magnitude. Some WP:RS like this affirm it is around 1019 eV.
It could be helpful to disitnguish it from the solar wind which spans from 0.5 (11.5 in the italian WP) to 10 keV. There is qualitative description for which nowhere is given a likelihood or a frequency related to the hypothesis of a "particle, which could be a proton, a nucleus, an electron, a photon, or (rarely) a positron, strikes an atom's nucleus in the air it produces many energetic hadrons." Hope someone will want to help in improving the WP article.Philosopher81sp (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of magnitude and frequency
Talk:Justin Jeffre

message: Multiple issues, including Neutral Point of View, Advertising, Conflict of Interest, Original Research. 
* It glosses over Jeffre's primary claim to notoriety: His participation in the corporate boy band 98 Degrees. (NPOV) Without that, he is arguably a non-notable person.
* It contains five references to the Cincinnati Beacon, a blog operated by Jeffre's friend, who is also the primary author of this entry. Ergo, conflict-of-interest.
* It contains at least six links to Cincinnati Beacon articles. Certainly self-promotion. Possibly advertising. Also, possibly, original research.
* Reporting on Jeffre's political activities does not meet the NPOV standard. 
* The Cincinnati Beacon does not have a print edition. This is either outdated or inaccurate. 
Wikiman45223 (talk) 04:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've re-directed the page to the 98 Degrees page. I felt that it looked like somewhat of a vanity article; a search for sources didn't come up with anything really meaty enough to expand it, and per WP:MUSIC, being part of one hit band does not mean one should have their own article; it should instead be re-directed to the main band's page. If someone disputes this, feel free to revert my change. I may put the article up for a deletion discussion if it is, but mostly for the purpose of seeing what the community would think on the matter. Nomader (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Abraham Osheroff

message: This article reads a bit like a hagiography. It needs some work to make it match A NPOV
Cheers
V. Joe (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much though I admire the man, I agree. It needs work. - Jmabel | Talk 23:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag
Talk:Cueva de los Tayos

message: A hoax from User:Ethicalhacker and IP User:67.113.48.197 ? Are they the same? Should this be deleted? --Wetman 19:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has shaped up excellently. I owe you all thanks and withdraw my skepticism. --Wetman 08:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The various myths about this cave were definitively debunked by the very expedition quoted in some of the "supporting" websites - the 1976 British expedition.  The cave does exist, Neil Armstrong was actually there, but the exotic claims of a metallic library, altars, artificial tunnels etc were completely disproved.  See Red Rose Cave and Pothole Club Journal No 7 (1977) or Caving International No 1 (1978). This article needs to be rewritten on a more factual basis, making clear which are the facts and which are the myths. Right now it is difficult to tell. Ian mckenzie 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax - Yes, and No

message: Thanks for bringing disputed statements to light.  If anyone is intersted in sorting out fact from fiction and has conclusive evidence that can be referenced, I welcome any edits that shift debunked statements in the main body of this article into a subcategory of the Lore section, hopefully with a clear explaination how the controversy arose, etc...  Thanks again.  --67.113.49.74 16:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions Welcomed 

message: I have reorganized the Redirects so that this cave appears under its proper name, Cueva de los Tayos. Ian mckenzie 21:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And now so does the associated talk page. B7T (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relocation 

message: The original Talk page comments for this article appear at []. Ian mckenzie 21:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now at Talk:Cave of the oil birds--Auric (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

text: And now they are all above the discussion on this page. B7T (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This subtitle was originally Perpetuating the Myth, and was changed by Satanael to Perpetuating the Misconception, a change I disagree with.  What is being perpetuated is the story of a metallic library in a cave, not the location of said cave.  Perhaps Myth was the problem; can we settle on Legend then? Ian mckenzie 02:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perpetuationg the 'Legend' 

message: The Nexus Magazine article no longer appears at the link provided; however, research at the Wayback Machine helped me discover it's still available at its author's website.  I'd just go ahead and change it, but I'm not sure what to change the link text to? B7T (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing dead external link
Talk:Arabic parts

message: Hi all - given that contemporary astrologers seem much more likely to call these mathematical factors "lots", should the name of the article and usage within be changed? It also helps clear up the historical fact that these techniques did not start with Arabic-language astrologers. TofuTomaso (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Arabic parts" or "Lots"?
Talk:Plaza de la Revolución

message: There was some duplication - I guess two sources brought together.  But one says that the Jose Marti Memorial is 428 feet tall, and the other that it is 138 feet high.  That can't be right.
Also, the National Library was a piped link to El Capitolio - that is nowhere near this Plaza.
-- Beardo 21:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The more that I think about it, the more I feel this should be split with separate articles for the municipio and for the actual square. -- Beardo (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split