Talk:Head & Shoulders

message: this article is a bit tilted (a definition, then an effectivity comparison, seems a bit like criticism... just a bit); but the information is correct, perhaps the article should be divided into sections.--164.77.109.210 08:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif

message: :Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-headandshoulders.gif

message: I believe for a time in the early-mid 1990s, Head and Shoulders sponsored NBC's NFL Live! postgame reports until the NFL Live moniker was dropped after the 1994 NFL season.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC Sports 

message: This article claims H&S launched the world's first shampoo with zinc pyrithione. I found no links nor references to validate that, and a google search turned up fruitless.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Revlon's ZP-II pre-dates H&S.--99.231.196.195 (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debut of Zinc Pyrithione 

message: I've listened twice now and I swear that Head and Shoulders is saying that its "hair endurance" formula contains hydrazine?  But look at the toxicity data as described in that article.  I didn't think that sounded like a likely component for a hair care formula... Wnt (talk) 00:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrazine??? 

message: In the UK now the shampoo is now available in seven different fragrances. So who says that capitalism doesn't produce any useful products? SmokeyTheCat 19:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joy to the World 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Head & Shoulders shampoo.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the information contained is quite objective: Description, some history, and ingredients. Nothing particularly promotional.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.97.2 (talk) 12:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: there is only one source that is not from P&G - and there is nothing - literally not one thing - that talks about the significance of this product.  It is not an encyclopedia article, It is just a catalog entry or an ad.  Jytdog (talk) 12:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I completely agree with everything that Jytdog said. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: As mentioned above, this article was a brochure for the product, not an encyclopedia article. I merged it to the active ingredient and redirected this article and merged the content into the article on the active ingredient, which is what we generally do with promotional articles on specific brands of medicated products or drugs.   User:BD2412 restored the article, and created a brief but very solid, and independently sourced encyclopedia article on the brand.  I have no objections to this at all.  Jytdog (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmerge 

message: 193.201.132.244 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What you write here has nothing to do with the policies and guidelines that govern Wikipedia. And again, your IP is registered to a PR firm, and you appear to be not following the WP:PAID policy. Jytdog (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

text: * I certainly see no reason to list the celebrity endorses for this or any other product, unless the endorsement itself garners significant coverage in reliable sources. Outside of such coverage, the fact that a celebrity takes a paycheck to hawk a product says nothing of encyclopedic note about that product. bd2412 T 14:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

text: Note: A list of endorsements was added to this article, and then removed by another editor. I agree with this removal. bd2412 T 11:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of celebrity endorsements