Talk:Emirate of Diriyah

message: "Since the establishment of the First Saudi State none of these practices have ever been observed again in Saudi Arabia." Referring to non-Salafi Islamic practices in the post-first state era. This is an absolute statement, which is false considering that Shi'a groups form 10-25% of Saudi Arabia's population. Shi'a are routinely arrested there for praying at grave sites. The Saudi government still tears down historical sites where it claims people pray. Also, Sufism is still strong in Hejaz. Blpb (talk) 10:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable claim

message: I'm very skeptical that this was their actual flag. Anyone agree? Slackerlawstudent 09:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was their actual flag , source:  Ammar 11:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still skeptical, but until I find out for sure I guess there's no point talking about it. Thank you for the link. Slackerlawstudent 23:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You welcome man :) Ammar 14:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Slacker , Actully Kuwait wasn't a part of FSS. This was an important seaport for ottomans untill the british conquest.   A M M A R  21:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well they did rule part of what is now Kuwait, but you're right, they couldn't take Kuwait city itself.  I'll remove it but also remove Iraq because, all though they raided Karbala, they never actually ruled it or sent any amirs over there.  --Slacker 03:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No , in fact they did fight the iraqi pasha and succesfuly conquered some land . The iraqi pasha was the first responser to Ghalib afandi of hejaz . As a result of this failure to help they lost lands . This is a sources ; it says that saudis have reached the iraqi river of Euphrates.    A M M A R  22:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kuwait

message: Why is the Sultanate of Lahej listed as preceeding state in the infobox? The Sultanate of Lahej is not mentioned in the article itself. And I doubt that this Sultanate was occupied. Arturius001 (talk) 23:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sultanate of Lahej 

message: I question the idea that the First Saudi state was Sunni. After all, Wahhabism discriminated against all non-Wahhabi (/Salafi) Muslims. While the transgressions against the Shi'a (see destruction of Karbala) and the Sufis are perhaps more well publicized, I don't believe the Sunnis escaped this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.140.125.81 (talk) 00:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Salafist reform movement, and the related movement of Wahhabism (there's actually little difference in practise) fall within the branch of Sunni Islam. This isn't really questioned by anyone except polemicists. That they are dismissive of, or even sometime persecute other Sunnis who hold different views, doesn't remove their religious affiliation. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 20:51, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunni Affiliation  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Emirate of Diriyah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100914081717/http://www.islamlife.com/religion2/component/content/article/69-later-scholars/672-biography-of-imam-muhammad-bin-abdul-wahhab to http://www.islamlife.com/religion2/component/content/article/69-later-scholars/672-biography-of-imam-muhammad-bin-abdul-wahhab
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106111328/http://ibnsaud.info/main/9456.htm to http://www.ibnsaud.info/main/9456.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106111328/http://ibnsaud.info/main/9456.htm to http://www.ibnsaud.info/main/9456.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100107002745/http://ibnsaud.info/main/9458.htm to http://www.ibnsaud.info/main/9458.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: No references in article created in 2007; but may have relevance to page to be merged to. Bakertheacre Chat/What I Baked 21:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Different article, different content, year of abolished/founding and states of discussion, the article has been in enwiki for many years without more ref and no one had suggest that, so does not need merging. Merging template would be removed. (F5pillar---/  'Messager🖋📩) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Siege of Diriyah]] into [[Emirate of Diriyah]] 

message: Why does this map not include southern Najd? 46.184.88.188 (talk) 06:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it wasn't controlled by the Al Saud. Compare with this reliable source. DeCausa (talk) 19:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

text: That doesn't mean that it was part of the Emirate. The Al Saud had to pay tribute to the Ottomans at various time - Abdul Aziz did so from 1910. It doesn't mean that a map of the Ottoman Empire should include Nejd. DeCausa (talk) 13:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map 

message: Why is modern day Lebanon and some of modern day Pakistan & India just blue on the map? IndianEmperor7 (talk) 05:49, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map problem 

message: . 107.15.167.203 (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is extremely sloppy