lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:National socialism

message: It's called National *Socialism* for a reason.  Sure, like other types of political philosophy, it hasn't quite worked out - but there should be due weight given to other notions of national socialism that were not (and are not) so Euro-Centric (or, admittedly, genocidally inclined).  
If there were a logical way of dividing the political spectrum - then at least *list* the different forms of national socialism.  German National Socialism was only one type and variety - surely there have been others? 
MrASingh 00:52, 04 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You should make a redirect to the article most likely to be expected (see ) when making a link to National Socialism, that article is Nazism, not a disambig page. Intangible2.0 07:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not proper, the term covers more than just the German Nazis
The redirect should be to National Socialism (disambiguation)
Restored proper redirect to disambiguation page--Cberlet 15:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Links_to_disambiguation_pages. You are going against WP policy. Intangible2.0 17:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with your claim, and have filed for mediation.  Please join the mediation.Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/National_Socialism--Cberlet 18:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is silly. If editors use a wikilink to National socialism or National Socialism they expect the Nazism article. You do not wikilink to disambig pages (unless in the header of the article), because that kind of defies the purpose of wikilinking in itself. Sigh. Intangible2.0 18:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Re-direct

message: We need to have a discussion about the continuous redirect of National Socialism and National socialism to Nazism instead of National Socialism (disambiguation); and the continuous insertion of claims concerning the term and its use, especially in the lead, but also elsewhere. This discussion is best held at Nazism so we can all, literally, be on the same page.  Thanks. --Cberlet 14:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: National Socialism
Talk:Frank Mundus

message: A person identifying himself as Frank Mundus edited this article (correcting birth information) in January 2007.  See this edit. Americasroof (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess so - he also made one other change with the comment 'corrected my birthplace...' sjwk (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Did Frank Mundus edit this article?

message: A recent edit said the big shark catch was ruled illegitimate because of the whale chum.  However the referenced article in the obit says the catch was legitimate.  If it was not legitimate please cite it. Americasroof (talk) 04:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Legitimacy of Big Shark Catch

message: A recent edit said he got the name because he boat bounced like a cricket.  There's a source for the Jimminey Cricket.  There's no reference for the jumping. Americasroof (talk) 04:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Boat jumping around like Cricket

message: I reverted an edit that said "the man that harpooned the shark was stanley lenox the first mate of the ship" The edit has no refernce.  If it's true please provide a reference. Americasroof (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stanley Lenox and the Big Shark Harpoon
Talk:Frank Pollard

message: To anyone planning on making the edit, this Frank Pollard has absolutely nothing to do with the Frank Pollard mentioned in the Lamb of God song on the New American Gospel album entitled "Terror and Hubris in the House of Frank Pollard." The band is referring to a friend of theirs in Chicago; the info can be found in this interview.
http://www.roughedge.com/features/lambofgod1100.htm Thanks for your cooperation in keeping Wikipedia correct. J1.grammar natz (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamb of God
Talk:Frank Sesno

message: The article as-is repeats itself and/or contradicts itself in various sections. For example, Sesno has been covering the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election on CNN so from that standpoint his "18 years at CNN" is still ongoing. Also, the introduction section is repeated in the first paragraph that follows it, restating both his teaching and journalism expertise. Cleanup on aisle #3. Thanks. - Ageekgal (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have started work on this page.  I'm done for the night, but expect more to follow.  --rocketrye12 talk/contribs 04:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Cleanup 

message: What is the origin of his surname? Badagnani (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname 

message: Why refer to Coulter as "conservative" but not cite O'Donnell as "liberal"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.149.170 (talk) 01:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason this section is in the article is because of a conflict between Sesno and Coulter. Additional info about a third party seems to be irrelevant. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: conservative/liberal

message: I did not know from the article that he is such a staunch promoter of AIPAC.   His moderation at the event with Steny Hoyer and Kevin McCarthy, was so filled with softballs and bias that it, in my opinion, excludes Sesno as legitimate --Wikipietime (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  AIPAC March 2016
Talk:Frank Spotnitz

message: This is the material I removed from the article, until such time as it can be rewritten so that it is not a direct copy/paste of the source. Garchy (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numerous copyright violations
Talk:Helen Duncan

message: This reference will be added to the article. Duncan was exposed as a fraud by the London Spiritualist Alliance:
 Simeon Edmunds. (1966). Spiritualism: A Critical Survey. Aquarian Press. pp. 137-138 Steve the Skeptic (talk) 18:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Helen Duncan caught in fraud

message: Can we please get some good sources that Duncan is commonly known by this name, which are not linked to the Tony Robinson documentary? There are currently 86,000 ghits for "Helen Duncan" and a whopping 536 for "helen duncan" "blitz witch" "-tony robinson" - and most of those still refer to the documentary. If you exclude hits after 2008 (the year of the documentary), you get seven or eight hits, most of which are *still* undated "Blitz Witch" documentary references. I'm not sure that it deserves the prominence in the lede that it's currently been given. Vashti (talk) 11:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted this as I'm not satisfied that it's in fact an alias of Duncan's, much less that she is widely known by it. Vashti (talk) 22:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Blitz Witch"?

message: In the Infobox, he is listed as 'Henry Duncan (1916–1967)'. The year 1916 was when they married. But she died in 1956. Presumably 1967 refers to his death. The correct info in the box would be '1916-1956'. Valetude (talk) 17:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Husband
Talk:Romany Malco

message: I don't know how to fix the table, but his 2005 work is shifted to the right by one column in his filmography.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.50.81.34 (talk) 11:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 error 
Talk:Frank Tyson

message: His mother was Mrs Violet Tyson born 1892, does anybody know his father's name?Philipjelley (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:An Audience with...

message: Was this episode a repeat?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriskart (talk • contribs) 11:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Murray April 2008 
Talk:Ain't a Damn Thing Changed

message: Changed the intro to try and remove the 'more context needed' banner
Tyson 01:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:Aintadamnchanged.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aintadamnchanged.jpg
Talk:Imam Mustafayev

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Wando High School

message: A solid start article with lots of references. Some further Wikification is needed to explain some of the unfamiliar terminology (eg, Advance placement, Dual Credit, etc.). Spell out abbreviations such as JROTC (I’ve no idea what this might be). And who or what are the Wando Warriors mentioned in the intro? The references need to be properly formatted (see Auburn High School for an example of a well referenced school article).  The Alma Mater song needs to be properly referenced. Is it out of copyright? If there is any doubt it should be deleted.  External links shouldn’t be in the main article but should be used as references. Take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Try and reduce the lists and convert them into prose sections wherever possible. Well done! With a little more content and not so many lists this could soon be a B. Dahliarose 16:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Addison.ashley1 (talk) 17:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: To request that an article be created, please see WP:AFC. DannyS712 (talk) 18:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 November 2018 

message: - Raper 169.150.128.78 (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced, and see also WP:BLP. MPS1992 (talk) 18:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2019
Talk:Ben 10 (2005 TV series)

message: Please replace the template  with . 67.173.23.66 (talk) 03:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Vahurzpu (talk) 03:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2021 

message: There's a punctuation mistake, in Kevin's paragraph, stating
        constant changes makes, where it should be "make" Sibb1319 (talk) 23:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2023 

message: 103.172.29.236 (talk) 02:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2023 

message: So, i tried to add storyboard artist credits, and those credits were removed because "it's not a storyboard driven show". I don't get this, why are other shows categories with storyboard artist credits allowed but not this one? 89.164.22.152 (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storyboard Artist Credits removal
Talk:František Čermák

message: The name of this article should be changed to "Frantisek Cermak" because that is the name used on the English-language websites of the official governing bodies of tennis, which are the Association of Tennis Professionals and the International Tennis Federation.  This is also the name used on the English-language website of Davis Cup.  Finally, this is the name used on the English-language websites of the following Grand Slam tournaments: the French Open (Roland Garros), Wimbledon, the Australian Open, and the US Open.  Tennis expert (talk) 05:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Franz Crass

message: A large number of sources say he was born 9 February 1928, rather than 9 March.  French WP prefers February, while German and English go for March. 
In fact, both of the sources we ourselves use say 9 February, yet we still assert that it happened in March.  There is a ref to him turning 80 in March 2008, but it doesn't say that was when Crass himself celebrated his birthday, and it could easily have been based on the false date plucked from some reference book.  Or indeed from Wikipedia.  
Do we know for certain which is the correct month?  Until we can get clarity on this, I'm changing it to 9 February, so that at least we're not speaking with forked tongue.  --  ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ [your turn] 19:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And now we have an editor who says he's Crass's son, who has changed the date.  Is this acceptable?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Month of birth
Talk:Franz Halberg

message: There is a great deal of information about Halberg's work in the 1950s (and more) at Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s by Franz Halberg et al. in the Journal of Circadian Rhythms, http://www.jcircadianrhythms.com/content/1/1/2
--Hordaland (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toward expanding the article 
Talk:Milan, Ohio

message: 3/3/2007
According to mianohio.com there is currently a population of 3,500 people in Mian, Ohio
It is stated in the Widipedia page Milan, Ohio that there were 1,445 people in the vilage in 2000 - an ovious error.Milan27 01:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stringfellow Hawke

message: The pilot film makes it clear that Hawke does not eat meat, but does eat fish, which would make him a pescetarian.  Is this addressed later in the series? —MJBurrage(T•C) 03:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diet

message: In the NCIS (TV series) episode, "Dead Man Walking", the character Anthony Dinozzo makes a direct reference to this character, does that deserve inclusion? Sicnerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 02:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference in NCIS

message: The pilot movie and several episodes make reference to String having excellent hearing, including having him hear helicopters shortly before their sound is revealed to the audience. A minor point, but I think it's worth inclusion considering one would expect the opposite to be true because of exposure to loud prop noises. Curtis Autery (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of his hearing?
Talk:Grand Duke Michael Mikhailovich of Russia

message: Despite allegations to the contrary, it is difficult to believe that Michael Mikhailovich's marriage to a Teck would not have been deemed morganatic in Russia. Russia very strictly interpreted Ebenburtigkeit, so that Tsar Alexander II's marriage to a Rurikid princess such as Princess Catherine Dolgorouky, was declared morganatic by the groom himself. Given that Michael's eventual marriage to Pushkin's granddaughter, Countess Natalia of Merenberg, was morganatic, it seems very unlikely that a Teck marriage would have been accepted as equal, especially by Alexander III in 1887 (or even Nicholas II later) any more than it would have been accepted by Kaiser Wilhelm II. Better documentation of this abortive romance is needed to support the article's implication that such a match would have been treated as legally dynastic. FactStraight (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tecks may have been considered dynastically equal through their maternal line. Maximilian de Beauharnais, 3rd Duke of Leuchtenberg's marriage to Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia (1819–1876) was considered equal because of his mother's Bavarian lineage despite the fact the Beauharnais were parvenu royals tainted with Napoleonic connections.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 11:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. I concur that Maximilian's maternal line made him more palatable to the Romanovs but a Bavarian princess did not convey any legal "dynasticity" on the Beauharnais, and was not mentioned when a Beauharnais queen was chosen to be consort in Sweden: the King there explicitly acknowledged (in a letter to his wife, Désirée Clary) that the Beauharnais did not meet Sweden's legal standard, but the King authorized the marriage anyway because of Eugene de Beauharnais' uniquely high reputation -- which is also what I think persuaded the Romanovs (and the Braganzas of both Portugal & Brazil, the Hohenzollerns, etc). The Beauharnais were in a legal gray area, whereas the Tecks were not. FactStraight (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romancing Mary of Teck
Talk:Fred Hampton Jr.

message: This article is really poorly written at the moment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.241.122 (talk) 20:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: This article is very heavily biased toward Fred Hampton, Jr.'s point of view. Lots of little subtle bits of bias through-out as well as the fact that it's just poorly written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClickForth (talk • contribs) 00:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: There are no reliable sources here.  Corvus cornixtalk 00:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Since it has been over a year since the complaints of sourceless information and lots of subtle bias (both of which I agreed with), I removed most of the bottom half of the article. I don't feel this affects the quality of the article in a negative way, as most of the information that was encyclopedic was already in the top part and was just expanded on with biased and unsourced additions in the part I deleted. This man may be worthy of an entry, but much of the information in the article was not. 76.84.38.215 (talk) 10:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am reproducing below much of the material you deleted.  It contains some information that was not in the top part of the article.  Much of it is potentially verifiable; indeed, clues are included as to the sources.  I notice you did not attempt to track them down. If you were more interested in informing people than in suppressing information, you might have tried that, or at least done as I have done and put the material here for others to work on. -- Ong saluri (talk) 19:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I’d like to help however possible. FTIIIOhfive (talk) 00:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for new info for page update 

message: At several points in the article there are vague or confusing/contradictory references that are not explained until later paragraphs, if at all. For example, in the opening paragraph, his father is described as having been killed "December 4th," with no year nor reference to Fred's date of birth weeks later until later in the article. Fred's mother being included in that sentence also makes it unclear whether she, too, was killed during that raid. The next major issue concerns how many crimes he was charged with and how many him and his supporters claim he was framed for. The article says "both," but here in the talk page is an earlier piece of the article asserting that he's been charged three times (murder, robbery, arson) and convicted once (arson). Presumably the murder and robbery were part of the same trial and "both" is meant to refer to two trials rather than two charges, but it could also refer to "both" of the Korean stores he was charged with bombing. The article as written seems like it has two similar articles spliced together haphazardly.
68.60.202.174 (talk) 16:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing phrasing
Talk:Rifat Ozbek

message: I strongly believe ozbek had a strong position in British fashion circles int he 1980s and also was a noted personality onthe fashion scene during that era. This article should be kept and elaborated upon.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alec jiri (talk • contribs) 19:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rifat Ozbek article should be kept on Wikipedia
Talk:Stephen Lodge (screenwriter)

message: Hi. As requested by the numerous prods on the article page, I have removed some obvious copy/pasting, expanded the introduction, provided numerous sources as to notability, categorised/biostubbed &etc. Please help by providing the citation still required, and by generally expanding the article, with sources. I have removed the prods in anticipation. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 01:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He used to have his personal behind-the-scenes photo collection available online at a university website. Those pages went offline, but fortunately they were saved in the Internet Archive by many over the years and I have added the index external link to Wikipedia articles of the shows listed.
* https://web.archive.org/web/20041207014351/http://employees.oxy.edu/jerry/bts/index1.htm
Thanks, Mr. Lodge for your snapshots. 5Q5 (talk) 18:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal production photos collection
Talk:European Athletics Championships

message: Should this article, its sub-articles and category be renamed to "European Athletics Championships"? The EAA's regulations list its formal title as "European Championships in Athletics"(PDF), but on their site they refer to the event more often as "European Athletics Championships" (, ). All reliable secondary sources and news media refer to the event as the European Athletics Championships, so per WP:NC(CN) this seems to be the preferable title. Thoughts? --Muchness 01:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha! Should have looked here first. I have proposed the same move here. Any thoughts are very much welcome. If no one has any complaints then I'll go ahead with an entire move of the series of articles. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) 02:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest rename

message: The latest statistics handbook has some mistakes. 1934 Latvia is presented as Soviet Union, not sure if there are more. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal table 

message: I thought this was a done deal back in this 2022 RFC but obviously not. A handful of editors did another rfc with no sports projects input at all. And it's being challenged because we just noticed it. This could affect almost every single tennis and Olympic article we have, and goodness know how many other sports. Some may have already been moved it you weren't watching the article. And not just the article titles will be affected but all the player bios that link to the articles. Sure the links would be piped to the right place if thousands of articles moved, but if the wording in a bio still said 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles or Swimming at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre backstroke that would likely need to be changed by hand. There is also talk of removing the ndash completely.
Perhaps this is what sports projects want and perhaps not. Either way I certainly don't want projects ill-informed as the last RfC was handled. Express your thoughts at  the following rfc. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#RfC_on_capitalization_after_a_colon_or_dash|Major RfC on capitalization]] of all our articles