Talk:Nextel

message: This article should be Deleted and merged with Sprint Nextel
-Mrsanitazier 4:06 PM ET March 3.2006
:*This had been debated before.  I myself no longer have Sprint (Thank heavens) so I no longer really care about the debate outcome on their article.  But, one reason why this article *should* be saved is one-day all information about IDEN will probably be erased from the SPRINT article, when that company does away with IDEN.  Nextel (The historical company) is one place that information can be repositoried when IDEN eventually gets decommissioned in favor of CDMA by SPRINT. 
:P.S. This type of thing has also already been debated on Cingular vs. AT&T Wireless merger already (With results of keep). MCI vs. Verizon merger (same result).  AT&T vs. SBC (same result.)  Etc. CaribDigita 15:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My $0.02. When companies "merge," it's really a matter of one company buying the other, with the shareholders of the bought-out company getting stock in the purchasing company. That should be our guide. The legally surviving company should get the combined article, while the purchased company should get a shorter article geared towards the legally defunct company's history. oknazevad 20:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article deletion 

message: I agree with the previous comment. I think this Nextel article should hold it's one position as it will represent the existence of a stand alone company that once existed once Sprint decides the fully decommission the iDEN portion of their network. I followed the company's progress including its current position after being swallowed by Sprint in the manner in which it was. Leaving this article will provide a form of proof in Nextel's existence.
*WOW folks sure butchered this article over the last year...  The old defunct company info on the left is gone etc.  Soon there will be little to no need to keep the article all of the historical parts have been thrown away etc. It has almost been reverted back to a STUB article. CaribDigita 16:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be combined with the Sprint Article 

message: :Image:NASCAR Nextel Cup Series Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NASCAR Nextel Cup Series Logo.svg

message: While reading this article I noticed something regarding it's phone collection that seemed a tad, unusual. One will find this sentence the "Sprint acquisition" section. ->"Nextel is a very diverse selection of mobile phones." Now, other than the fact that it's paragraph lacks citations and it is (unless someone can prove it.) an opinion there is a major error in that sentence. Can a defunct company be diverse selection of phones or can it HAVE (or because nextel is dead HAD) a very diverse selection of mobile phones. Rengaw01 (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can a company be something else?