lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Downfall (band)

message: Seriously, why would anyone want to delete this page?  Isn't that what encyclopedias are for, information which is on a notable subject but might be extremely difficult to find otherwise?  Maybe that is what regular encyclopedias are for, and Wikipedia is merely for the latest iphone rumor update.  Also, what do "NN Band" and "prod" mean?  No wonder wikipedia is feared by so many non-nerds; the community is not very layperson friendly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.91.226.42 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 22 January 2007
I made attempt to edit the correct, accurate information. 
Downfall compilation appearance - 
Downfall song is titled “New Regulation” NOT “New Regulations”. 
“New Regulation” - Released on “Very Small World” 2xLP compilation in September 1991 NOT 1992. 
Source - https://www.discogs.com/release/4997321-Various-Very-Small-World
However after I made edit I reviewed the text again and attempted to fix a minor typo I made and received an edit block. 
I then saw the original text was reinstated by wiki moderator. 
If you wish to leave the wrong information on the Downfall wiki page I understand. 
Thank you for your time. Jarrett Gardner (talk) 18:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Place Bonaventure

message: VIA Rail Headquarters are in Place Ville Marie (?) Peter Horn 02:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: VIA Rail Headquarters

message: This articcle needs a list of stores, etc. Peter Horn 18:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stores

message: Such boasts need to be verified if they are to stated as facts on Wikipedia pages... Place Bonaventure was not the largest even at the time of its completion, not even for buildings of its kind and use.  With 372,000 m2 of floor space, Chicago's Merchandise Mart opened in 1930 litterally dwarfs Place Bonaventure. A couple of Wiki pages need to be corrected... 70.29.247.24 (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest?
Talk:DQE (band)

message: Can someone attempt to describe/categorize their music? Any information about the Low Life releases would make the discography a little more complete as well.  Also, add some past collaborators. 192.91.172.42 15:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dr. Buzzard's Original Savannah Band

message: The group started in The Bronx.66.108.106.248 (talk) 04:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin
Talk:Dr. Strangely Strange

message: An anonymous user added this comment to the page.  I have moved it here:
: Alternative Medicine was recorded and released in 1997
I have no idea if this is true or not, but it does contradict what the page says. Richard W.M. Jones 12:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I added the album Alternative Medicine, back in March 2006, I searched around for a recording date and as I knew Tim Booth, I know they did not record it recently and all searches show comments about it taking 30 years to be released, so I think you are correct to move this edit. In fact you should possible just have deleted it and not even mentioned it except in your edit summary. ww2censor 13:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative medicine
Talk:Dr. West's Medicine Show and Junk Band

message: Other than the tune and association with Norman Greenbaum there appears to be very little to give this group notability for inclusion here at Wikipedia. I would nominate the article for removal. What little is here on the group could be incorporated into the songs article. Having direct experience authoring other articles with a bit more info than this and being told they did not qualify for inclusion due to lack of notability is the basis for my opinion. I forget the wiki guideline that would apply here. Perhaps someone else can offer a more exact reading of the guideline in question relating to notability. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article deletion??
Talk:Dragonland

message: I think that the song 'Dragondawn', from the album 'The Battle of the Ivory Plains', is tweaked slightly from 'A Gift of a Thistle' composed by James Horner for the sountrack of Braveheart. Whether that is plagarism or not I am unsure.
I would like someone to get to the bottom of this, but I can't because i'm tired.
- - -TheBe(a)st. (Australia Wikipedia editor)- - - - - - - - -
Amazervero (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragondawn 

message: The release date for the new album is early 2009, and it's clearly not out. The official site is gone, the myspace is still Dragonland-themed. I think they broke up silently. Either way, the article should be changed to "TBA" for the new album. I'll try a myspace message to see whats going on. -Winter123 (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They're just taking their time it seems. Fair enough, they rock. 86.135.77.101 (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken up? 
Talk:Dream (Japanese group)

message: If you ask me, this page needs more people to help keep up the maintenance and current events.
People are needed to do pages for each of the singers; I see that Yu Hasube already has a page
Eventually the page will be sort of renamed in accordance with the changes in the group name stated in the article.
Anything else to add? Maybe some pics and such?
AnthonyWalters 23:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profiles for singers 

message: do they have a myspace? SaviorSix 18:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  myspace 

message: Shouldn't it be moved to "Dream" now that they're no longer called DRM? Moocowsrule (talk) 06:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: i love  kana Tachibana so much!I love her sound very much!I will support you forever Kana!You must continue to support the DREAM band!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.54.84.109 (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love kana tachibana
Talk:Dresden Philharmonic

message: I have removed this template, that indicated that This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. In summary, I've done this because both common sense and the policy at WP:BLPGROUP suggests that the Dresden Philharmonic is not a living person.
Specifically, WP:BLPGROUP says:
:This policy does not normally apply to edits about corporations, companies, or other entities regarded as legal persons, though any such material must comply with the other content policies. The extent to which the BLP policy applies to edits about groups is complex and must be judged on a case-by-case basis. A harmful statement about a small group or organization comes closer to being a BLP problem than a similar statement about a larger group; and when the group is very small, it may be impossible to draw a distinction between the group and the individuals that make up the group.  When in doubt, make sure you are using high-quality sources.
The Dresden Philharmonic has existed in one form or another since 1870, and it is extremely unlikely that any of its original members will still be alive. Its continued existence beyond the lifespan of its founders strongly suggests that it can be regarded as a legal person. The orchestra's web site (http://www.dresdnerphilharmonie.de/) shows that it has a management structure with directors, press office, etc, that is not unlike that of most corporations. A page on the Orchestra's web site (http://www.dresdnerphilharmonie.de/?i=orch_mitglieder) indicates that it has a current membership of well over 100 members, and over the years that number must run into thousands. It therefore seems perverse to regard it as a small group, and it is my judgement in this case that the policy on biographies of living persons does not apply. -- Starbois (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed WPBiography template
Wikipedia talk:Comments on Citizendium

message: This Wikipedia-space page (and here, accompanying talk page) is for Wikipedians to comment on Citizendium--the proposed project itself, not the Wikipedia article.  Currently, Talk:Citizendium contains much discussion about the project itself, rather than the article, which is inappropriate.
Comments on the article should go on Talk:Citizendium.  
As Larry Sanger's most recent project is relevant to Wikipedia (if it succeeds, we might need to react to it), and is being discussed (improperly) in other places; I have been WP:BOLD and created this page, in the Wikipedia namespace, for users to discuss Citizendium.
This is not a policy proposal.  At this time, Citizendium isn't in operation, so there is little to propose.
If someone wants to MfD this article, be my guest.  :)  However, discussion on this topic is likely to occur somewhere in the Wikipedia; better here than in article space or other generic places like WP:VP, WP:ANI, etc.
--EngineerScotty 02:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine. We need a page to keep track of what's going on there - there might be some interesting ideas which we can make use of. And if the project really takes off then we may want to have some infrastructure to facilitate cooperation between the two projects. Haukur 11:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:DRS (band)

message: Question: Is this the same person as MC D.R.S., the rapper associated with LTJ Bukem? Chubbles 16:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, no, to answer my own question... Chubbles 16:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duchess Says

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review of Anthologie des 3 Perchoirs. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section of this page, or to the album's page if one is created. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (unfavorable) Mike harkin (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link suggestion
Talk:Doofus

message: I may be nitpicking here, but doofus in my experience is the prefered spelling. Cf the abbreviated "doof", and that the first two entries on the page are "doofuses" and not "dufuses".--Ioshus(talk) 17:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, page moved. --kingboyk 12:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Bangalore/Bangalore1

message: Who is who in the picture!! -- Samir धर्म 02:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second on Samir. Please try to have such meetups on regular basis. --Victor 23:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Could those who have taken and put up the photographs please consider licensing their photographs under creative-commons by-attribution-2.5 or GFDL, unless they are planning to make commercial use of it. Without such licensing these images cannot be legally used on user pages or such like. Shyamal 03:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted photographs 

message: Do you remeber Jimmy's comments? We should actively try to motivate them (women) to be around here (I mean to edit wikipedia, English as well as other Indian language):  -  - . Please pass on the messages among your friends. --Bhadani 01:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian women wikipedians
Talk:Duo Datz

message: That "official site" the article links to doesn't have any content relating to Duo Datz, only a lot of ads.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.167.54.37 (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ktkvtsh (talk) 11:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Translated
Talk:Dynamic Duo (South Korean duo)

message: See Dynamic duo disambiguation page. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Numerous other Duos

message: Please add the translated tracklist to their 8th album under the subsection "Discography".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dynamichaos (talk • contribs) 04:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  8th album 
Talk:DYS (band)

message: How old where those guys? They look really young on the photos... --85.179.67.221 (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 
Talk:Simon Fieldhouse

message: This article has far too many images within the 'gallery'. To balance the article, the images would be better off located offsite and accessible via an external link. -- Longhair\talk 06:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Early Man (band)

message: Many critics have labeled Early Man as "copycats" or "plagiarizers" because their songs imitate classic metal acts like Black Sabbath or Judas Priest. But, does that automatically qualify them as throwaway material? On the 1st listen of Closing In, that was the question that kept popping in my head. But then, I realized... what metal band HASN'T borrowed from Sabbath or Priest? Another thing I realized: rock itself got its starts by "stealing" (or covering) songs from the blues. Just look at Led Zeppelin, Aerosmith, or even The Who. Even Sabbath started out as a blues cover band, Earth.   So when you think about it, it's not really plagiarism. Metal is just trying to start anew, just like rock did in the 1960s.
Take some time to think about it, and then it'll all make sense. When that happens, you'll be ready to rock!
URFG 23:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who are you talking to? This is an enyclopedia, not a forum. —Ortchel 15:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Originality - Does it really matter?

message: The first paragraph talks about Brooklyn and LA, but the info box says "Ohio." This seems inconsistent, or at least, unexplained.
74.71.216.91 (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin?
Talk:Easy Action (band)

message: In interview with one polish magazine in 2015 Kee said that there will be no next album of the band, as they don't want to continue without Michel. 185.28.251.102 (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of the band
Talk:Easy Star All-Stars

message: No references to establish notability beyond a rating from an australian publication that only began in 2008.  I suspect this topic fails WP:BAND. -Verdatum (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: This is Remy from Easy Star Records. 
We'd like to clarify and improve the accuracy of this article, but I am very new to Wikipedia editing. 
What I've done today is a small experiment. 
We can also provide better 3rd party sourcing for citations in the article. 
Looking forward to getting more involved.
EasyStarStaff (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Remy, while the Wikipedia does not forbid it, we do not encourage either the subjects of biography articles, or their A&R representatives or record label workers to edit these articles. I would like to pass on information on a template to you- one we give to every new editor here, so that they might understand the guidelines for editing articles in the Wikipedia. You should honestly register a Username with the Wikipedia, and that will provide you with both a userpage and a talk page, if you have not done so already. The template can be placed on either page, and the talk page is essential so you can recieve help and information from other editors talk pages, and you may contact them in turn. Thank you for your interest in the Wikipedia- this is merely a difficult situation, attempting to keep the required NPOV required. Take a look at WP:MOS. Last, album covers only belong in the articles about the albums, and not in the infoboxes for the biographies. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised introduction for accuracy 

message: Replaced picture with more current image.
EasyStarStaff (talk) 08:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a picture 
Talk:The Ecstasy of Saint Theresa

message: shouldn't be a notice about the lack of the "The"?
after all, the proper name is "The Ecstasy of Saint Theresa"...
I agree... the band is called _The_ Ecstasy of Saint Theresa (see their web site, their albums, and my comment to the edit i just made to the first paragraph), so the title of the page needs to be changed.  but i don't know how to do that at this point.  Iahklu (talk) 01:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Edea (musical group)

message: Shouldn't this be at Edea and the record of the same name at Edea (album)? Am I missing something; is there some third thing called "Edea" that would specifically mean that the "(musical group)" bit there has a justification? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 19:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I suppose that link there answers my question, in that it is a disambiguation page with more than half a dozen meanings.... Heh! Back to work, nothing to see here, move along... -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 19:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Category talk:Open access journals

message: There are now 2403 OA journals, accordingto DOAJ. There are probably another thousand that do not meet their criteria, by having delayed open access, or some similar compromise.  Is it the intention to have articles on every last one of them?  If not , where do we stop? DGG 03:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This question seems charmingly outdated. WP:N is the answer.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Where do we stop?

message: Why are there so many journals misfiled under "C"? Nareek (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because someone categorized them as "Open access journals|Category:open access journals", the "pipe" meaning that they are alphabetized as "Category:open access journals"... Needs cleanup... sigh... --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Done. Most of the journals involved (almost all published by Medknow Publishers) need cleanup themselves... --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetization
Talk:Narrow-gauge lines of the Victorian Railways

message: ::In future, if your going to remove any information like that, perhaps creating a new page which it would fit into would be more usefull, the information removed from the Walhalla Goldfields Railway page is now located on the Wallhalla railway line page. cheers guys --Dan027 07:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dan027, the question that we were discussing above is whether the information is notable enough to be mentioned at all.  The Walhalla railway line page, apart from reinstating some links to pages about sidings, which almost certainly don't deserve their own articles anyway, simply duplicates information from the Walhalla Goldfields Railway article (and the station links from this article).  Philip J. Rayment 09:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the Walhalla page is still imcomplete, i have been collecting more detailed information into the history of the railway. --Dan027 09:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

text: thank you. however this is where wikipedia differs from a normal printed encyclopedia, its ability to cover many topics and articles that would not normaly be in a printed encyclopedia. --Dan027 12:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walhalla page 

message: The reason for this edit was to split out the lines into their own articles, and have links from this main page, with just a small summary left behind. There is enough content on each line for their own article (and they cen be expanded ever more) and don't see the point in maintaining it in two places. Wongm (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Far enough. But this is not a long article, under 20kb, so hardly needs pruning. Also the text deleted allows a comparison between the lines, useful to somebody interested in the system as a whole. I've no objection to deleting the lists of stations, they are most appropriate to a line article. But this should be uniform, you'd want a Gembrook article as well. Cheers --Michael Johnson (talk) 05:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary style
Talk:Eggstone

message: The article Shooting Time was blanked and redirected to this article. Relevant page history can be found there. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  21:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect notice
Talk:Eidolon (band)

message: Alright, I fixed up/added a few albums. When I get some more time I'm going to try to go a little more in-depth and bring all of the Eidolon-related articles up to par. WinterSteel (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The deletion debate was closed as keep due to number of reliable sources mentioning the band. Since most of those sources mention the band only in context with Megadeth, there is not enough text about Eidolon itself to cover a quality article. I think that merging is a logical choice. If we can't reach a consensus, I suggest moving the page to Article incubator in order to see if it can be improved, though I seriously doubt that. — NikFreak (leave message) 15:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one is replying, I am beginning to assume that merging can be started tomorrow. If someone has an objection, this would be good time to explain your points of view. Otherwise, I will begin to merge the article with Megadeth in next 5 days. Regards. — NikFreak (leave message) 13:10, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, the AfD already established that a separate article is warranted, as multiple criteria of WP:MUSIC are met. If you believe the closing admin was mistaken, you can take it up with them, or go to deletion review. I didn't participate in the AfD, but I think the closing admin was completely correct, for what it's worth. I've added several references to the article just now. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, I have already talked to admin about that. In AfD discussion we agreed that the sources mentioning the band are reliable. However, everyone who voted for deletion also agreed that the sources mentioning the band in context with Megadeth aren't enough to make a standalone article. The closing admin said that there was only one way the deletion nomination could end (since even the ones who voted for deletion agreed that there are enough reliable sources to pass notability), but he also said that the merging can be done if necessary. As I can see, the only significant source is the Allmusic one. I believe that encyclopedia would be improved with such articles being merged with ones of greater importance. Since I am not the one to decide that on my own, I took it here for discussion. If we disregard notability criteria for a second, a stub of this quality shouldn't exist on Wikipedia on it's own. If someone wants to try and rewrite the article, taking informations from all the sources mentioned in AfD discussion, be my guest. But I do not believe that it can be done and I would like to start merging in 4 days. It is always possible to revert the edits and recreate this article if someone decides he can improve it to a decent quality. I definitely do not intend to leave the article the way it is now. I am offering one solution. If someone has a better idea, feel free to discuss about it here or take it to my talk page. — NikFreak (leave message) 13:31, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Megadeth]]