lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:User wikipedia/WikiGnome

message: I almost had a stroke when I saw :Image:WikiGnome.png creepy image in my userbox list.  Too bad about the copyright issues with the old one :Image:Wikignome.jpg.  I'll keep my eye out for another possible replacement. — MrDolomite | Talk 19:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My guess would be that the original image does indeed come from the hand of Palmer Cox who died in 1924. See this image for comparison. According to an image description page on Commons, the original image should come from Palmer Cox: "Brownies through the Union", p. 39 (1895). Could somebody double check this? Valentinian T / C 22:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I've changed the WikiGome capitals on this userbox according to the Wikipedia article. I wonder, should the category be renamed as well? Michaelas10 (T|C) 20:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiGnome capitals

message: Hello, fellow editors ... I have changed This user is a WikiGnome. to This editor is a WikiGnome.If you object to the change, please comment here before you unilaterally revert it ... Happy Editing! —  12:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed "user" to "editor" 

message: I've added a new gnome image as an option and changed the default image to the one of the new gnome because the users could identify the gnome more easily in the new image than the gnome in the previous default image. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new gnome image 

message: This userbox gives the main field a white background. But Template:User wikipedia/WikiFairy and Template:User wikipedia/WikiElf both  use a light beige background and a brown border, and they have the text left-aligned rather than centered. Because this template is used on more than 2300 userpages, I'm a bit wary of changing it. But what do others think? Should we have a different box to match the style of the others? Change this one? Here's some testing of what it would look like when I tried to change it in a draft template:
*
*
*
*This one allows you to change the background colour if you want. That would apply with any image that has a transparent background. Here's an example of that:
*You can also change the image, among other properties.
What do you think? – Pretended leer {talk} 21:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency with other userboxes
Talk:Lancashire Heeler

message: This breed is classed in Britain as a VNB - a breed which originated in the UK but now has registration numbers with the Kennel Club of less then 300 puppies per year.  
I'm a Canadian teenager on a gap year before Uni and I'm really interested in this.  Would anyone like a VNB paragraph/link on this page?  I can write it, but am ignorant about formatting etc.  Plus, I'm trying to put together a whole collection on all 29 breeds on this list, including history and so on, using Wikipedia as one of my many sources.  If you can help, or are interested at all, please contact me either on my talk page or at green_ied_dragon@hotmail.com   
--The Wizard of Magicland 19:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerable Native Breed 

message: minor change requested for TYPO   Jacky Cutler article 'Lancashire Heeler Breed Feature' citation is from Lancashire Heeler Community NOT Lancashire Heeler Club as cited.  URL and all other details are correct.  Causette999 (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the change, but as the page isn't protected you're welcome to be bold and make any necessary changes yourself. After all, this is a wiki! —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 13:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Talk:Northlandz

message: Northlandz used to be the largest model railroad in the world but has been overtaken in 2005 by Miniatur-Wunderland in Hamburg/Germany.
see: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniatur-Wunderland and http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modelleisenbahn  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CSchoenberger (talk • contribs) 08:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. Since there is a list of general references in the article, those that support the passages placed here should be cited if they are moved back to the article. I've added the missing publication info to all four of them and moved one of them to the Lead so that that section consists of at least one cited sentence. This diff shows where the moved material was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 15:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations

message: You might want to mention that William's model railroad was featured in PBS's Reading Rainbow, in the episode titled "A Three Hat Day." An episode synopsis can be found at the Reading Rainbow Fandom (https://reading-rainbow.fandom.com/wiki/A_Three_Hat_Day), and a full episode can be seen on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw2JJMfa8lc). ElMeroEse (talk) 03:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Reading Rainbow
Template talk:Self-published

message: I appreciate there is a very slight difference between this and , however would a merge be possible? Addhoc 15:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there should be.  Primary sources is for when those are the only cited sources; this is for when there's an improper but not necessarily exclusive reliance on them.  You could have an article that uses only primary sources and is ineligible for this template if it uses them properly and only for basic descriptive claims. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Isn't a little bit off these article are put in Accuracy Dispustes rather NPOV Disputes?  Would anyone object to a change?--BirgitteSB 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Is there some reason we don't allow |section on this like we do on almost all templates of this sort?  In many if not most cases, a self-published source problem is going to occur in one section of article, not throughout the entire thing. The code to do this can be trivially borrowed from another template, like . — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 19:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. The code was already in there; I've updated the documentation to reflect this. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 19:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Section code

message: I agree with Brigitte above that this template should not put articles in :Category:Accuracy disputes. An article which "may contain improper references to self-published sources" has a problem with its referencing, not necessarily with its accuracy. It is similar to categories like , , , ,  and , which slot articles in :Category:Articles lacking sources or :Category:Articles lacking reliable references. If nobody disagrees, I will edit the template so that it puts articles in :Category:Articles lacking reliable references. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Debresser (talk) 18:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited the template as announced above. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category, again 

message: "Self-published means that the source was written and published by the same person or organization  ...": same as who/what? Same as the topic of the article, or same as the person writing the content and supplying the source? I'm not sure whether this is about, for example, sourcing information about a company to the company's own website and press releases, or about editors sourcing their contributions to external materials that they, themselves, wrote, as though that gets around the bar on original research. Can the answer be made explicit in the documentation? Largoplazo (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the absence of a response in nine months mean I'm free to interpret it as I want? Largoplazo (talk) 14:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is "self"?
Talk:Key distribution

message: The relation between key distribution and secret sharing could be explained in more detail. It is also not quite clear what is the right thing to be explained under the title of key distribution. I would rather expect something like Diffie-Hellman key exchange. Probably key distribution is not a to clear concept, and used to express different things. It could also be related to key management. 19:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Toyota MasterAce

message: My friend and I were trying to figure out what kinda van she had today. We always thought it was a Toyota Freedom II but now we know. It's a 1986 Toyota Van Wagon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_5N-k6dfZM We have affectionately named her "The Easy Bake Oven" Malindrast (talk) 18:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Friend's 1986 Toyota Van Wagon 

message: Is this related to the Toyota Lite Ace? It is a similar size anyway, though the front is a bit different. If true, would it be the equivalent of the Japanese spec Town Ace (a passenger version of the Lite Ace)? --Zilog Jones 19:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related? 

message: Can anyone explain to me how this is not a Front-midship layout? The engine is only just behind the front axle! I can post pictures of the one I own to prove it if anyone doubts! Scott Paeth 00:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RMR 

message: I'd like to know where these vans were assembled.
Pam1855  —Preceding comment was added at 05:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assembly
Talk:Christmas Concerto

message: Is there anything else that can be included in this article?Joniscool98 19:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question?

message: The recordings that say they are of the first three movements sound like they are only of the first two. --96.242.74.172 (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; there doesn't seem to be a file which contains the 3rd movement. I'm going to change the description. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well-spotted. The place where I found these files, the Pandora Records archive, is full of mistakes like this. This is the fourth work with missing movements that I've encountered from that site. I wish that I could do something about it, but my attempts to contact the site's maintainer have been unsuccessful. Graham87 08:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only the first two movements?!
Talk:Eastbridge Hospital of St Thomas the Martyr, Canterbury

message: Is this or this not based on  Edward Hasted's survey of Kent c. 1800.? RJFJR 19:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  28 December 2006 
Talk:Sussex Spaniel

message: This breed is classed in Britain as a VNB - a breed which originated in the UK but now has registration numbers with the Kennel Club of less then 300 puppies per year.  
I'm a Canadian teenager on a gap year before Uni and I'm really interested in this.  Would anyone like a VNB paragraph/link on this page?  I can write it, but am ignorant about formatting etc.  Plus, I'm trying to put together a whole collection on all 29 breeds on this list, including history and so on, using Wikipedia as one of my many sources.  If you can help, or are interested at all, please contact me either on my talk page or at green_ied_dragon@hotmail.com   
--The Wizard of Magicland 19:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerable Native Breed 

message: Just removed a link to a breeders website. According to the guidance on what types of external links are suitable on wikipedia pages, breeders websites are not permitted.Miyagawa (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breeders Websites
Talk:William Fairbairn

message: It appears that the term "Tubular Steel" redirects to the William Fairbairn article. This may be appropriate (I don't know), but as it stands neither "tubular" nor even "steel" are mentioned in this article at all, so it is unclear why the redirect exists. Is this a mistake, or is there a valid reason for the redirect? If it is valid, I suggest that the link between William Fairbairn and Tubular Steel should at least be mentioned in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.225.207.97 (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fairbairn worked with tubular iron structures. I will change the redirect to Cold formed steel. Well spotted! --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tubular Steel?
Talk:FC Lorient

message: I have removed the ins/out section because it was incomplete.  Other FC's articles have reached featured article status without them.   sʟυмɢυм • т • c  19:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006-07 squad

message: The redirect 2023–24 FC Lorient season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dl.thinker (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 FC Lorient season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Molly Ephraim

message: I have assessed this article as a start, since it has slightly more info than a stub would have.  However, the article has serious referencing problems.  Many of the references, such as IMDB and blogs, are not considered to be WP:Reliable sources and would not be acceptable in a higher-assessed article.  Second, the refs that are here do not include the necessary information, such as the title of the article, the date published and accessed, the name of the publisher and the name of the author.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment; Referencing problems

message: Could someone had personal. Thank you 174.215.189.35 (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone had personal. Thank you
Talk:Shaolin Temple (1982 film)

message: This was another Shaolin temple movie which didn't star Jet Li, and it came earlier. I saw this one on the television yesterday.
This is the link to the one I'm talking about
http://kungfucinema.com/reviews/shaolintemple1976.htm
Maybe we should have a disambiguation page? --Bigbossman 05:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Shaolin temple movie (1976) 

message: What about the theme song of this film?
I've talked to many chinese from the people's republic who entirely said that this song became something like a folksong due to the popularity of this film.
Anyone could sing it.
I'm talking about the song which is played at the beginning and at the end while the credits play.
--Kontemarlos (talk) 13:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaolin Temple Theme Song 

message: According to many Chinese sources, total ticket sales amounted to 70 million, not 50 million. 50 million people saw the film, it's true, but many million people--mostly youths--paid to watch the movie more than once (twice, thrice or even four times). The movie was wildly popular among youths, and sparked a kung fu craze in China in the 1980s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:3003:2004:2A00:A006:C052:B2BE:E7BD (talk) 14:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Total Ticket Sales
Talk:Mircea the Shepherd

message: ==Untitled==
From the article "While the Habsburgs who occupied Transylvania in 1551 wanted a ruler devoted to their cause in Wallachia, the new governor of Transylvania, the imperial general Castaldo backed Radu Ilie, who, also surrounded by boyars in exile, crossed the border into Wallachia in November 1552." 
"While" usually introduces a contrast, but I don't see the contrast. I suggest one of the following, depending which is meant: 
:If no contrast was meant, "Because the Habsburgs who occupied Transylvania in 1551 wanted a ruler devoted to their cause in Wallachia, the new governor of Transylvania, the imperial general Castaldo backed Radu Ilie, who, also surrounded by boyars in exile, crossed the border into Wallachia in November 1552." 
:If the contrast was meant "While the Habsburgs who occupied Transylvania in 1551 supported Mircea as a ruler devoted to their cause in Wallachia, the new governor of Transylvania, the imperial general Castaldo backed Radu Ilie, who, also surrounded by boyars in exile, crossed the border into Wallachia in November 1552." 
Which is meant? - Jmabel | Talk 19:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation of clauses unclear=

message: From the article "While the Habsburgs who occupied Transylvania in 1551 wanted a ruler devoted to their cause in Wallachia, the new governor of Transylvania, the imperial general Castaldo backed Radu Ilie, who, also surrounded by boyars in exile, crossed the border into Wallachia in November 1552." 
"While" usually introduces a contrast, but I don't see the contrast. I suggest one of the following, depending which is meant: 
:If no contrast was meant, "Because the Habsburgs who occupied Transylvania in 1551 wanted a ruler devoted to their cause in Wallachia, the new governor of Transylvania, the imperial general Castaldo backed Radu Ilie, who, also surrounded by boyars in exile, crossed the border into Wallachia in November 1552." 
:If the contrast was meant "While the Habsburgs who occupied Transylvania in 1551 supported Mircea as a ruler devoted to their cause in Wallachia, the new governor of Transylvania, the imperial general Castaldo backed Radu Ilie, who, also surrounded by boyars in exile, crossed the border into Wallachia in November 1552." 
Which is meant? - Jmabel | Talk 19:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Also, in general, inline references would be good. - Jmabel | Talk 19:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Category talk:Rosh yeshivas

message: BS"D
There's no page for the Rosh Hayeshiva for Yeshivas Ner Israel. HoRov Ahron Feldman. Nor are there Pages for the Baltimore Tendlers, Who are one the most well known family of rabbonim in Baltimore. --Shaul avrom 19:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't really see how :Category:Rosh yeshivas belongs to :Category:Orthodox yeshivas. I am removing this category.--Redaktor 12:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: Orthodox yeshivas
Talk:Nathan Appleton

message: I am using a tablet computer which does not allow me to see edit history, reverse an edit and begin again. I see that I have left this with a ? where there should be a date. Could someone fix this, thanks. RichardBond (talk) 13:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in family section 
Talk:Carlos Gurpegui

message: This piece contains a brief mention of Gurpegui's situation "(...)Carlos Gurpegui is still banned..". It should be noted it is an opinion piece and therefore not a source. The UEFA source is a good one and enough to back this. --79.144.143.50 (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Guardian piece adds nothing
Talk:Carlton Cuse

message: Damon and him are hilarious on the official lost podcast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.137.64 (talk) 02:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hilarious 

message: This is a well-developed article. it's Achilles heal is its citations, which are not in proper format. I can recommend a cleanup, using Wikipedia:Citation templates. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 16:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. TJRC (talk) 22:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper citation formats suggested 

message: the entry (renewed for a 3rd and final season) made it sound like the show was granted a 3rd season to close things off. this is incorrect, so i altered to portray what happened better 67.224.118.136 (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  colony's 3rd season
Talk:Vacuum permittivity

message: This was discussed at some length above, but that was back in 2007. I'll open the question again: can we move the article to electric constant, the name preferred by CODATA, the BIPM and NIST?
Let's take a look at the normal definition of permittivity:
:\mathbf{D}=\varepsilon \mathbf{E}
where D is the electric displacement field and E is the electric field. You cannot use that definition to define a "vacuum permittivity" because there cannot be an electric displacement field in a vacuum (at least, not in classical terms). I guess that's why the name became "electric constant" in the first place, although I haven't got any reference to back up that hunch. The change is relatively recent – the 1986 CODATA set of values was still using "permittivity of vacuum" while the 1998 set uses "electric constant". Physchim62 (talk) 01:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name (yet again) 

message: From the article: In the vacuum of classical electromagnetism, the polarization P = 0, so εr = 1 and ε = ε0.
Therefore D = ε0 . E. But what can be displaced in a vacuum???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talk • contribs) 15:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacement in a vacuum? 

message: The Coulomb constant is already discussed fully at Vacuum permittivity; it does not warrant own page as this is just duplication of content.  —Quondum 17:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Captain Chicky (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge [[Coulomb constant]] → [[Vacuum permittivity]]
Talk:Víctor Mirecki Larramat

message: "and, at the year, he moved to Halle, to the grave of his mentor, Servais."
(Literal translation, I've rewritten it in my latest edits.)
The expression "al año" in the original was unclear to me, so I'm not certain what it meant—the article on Servais mentions November of 1866 as his death, while from context saying "that year" would be referring to 1865.
I've checked the French article (being much more fluent in French), and it states "during the course of that year"... Seems one of the French or Spanish article is a translation of the other. Laogeodritt [ Talk | Contribs ] 22:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight contradiction ... 

message: User User:Jac16888 deleted over two-thirds of the translated content. Is this an improvement? Or did he delete essential text along with inessential text?
--Trelawnie (talk) 03:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massive deletion
Talk:Ashikaga Mochiuji

message: Despite my repeated requests to the author of this article to be more careful with his grammar, this, and many of his other articles, remain in a state of near-incomprehensibility. Someone with knowledge of the subject, or research sources, (likely myself) will have to come back here and fix this. LordAmeth 21:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up