Talk:Intelligent agent

message: ===Merge===
Consider merging Intelligent agents into this page. It focuses on software "bots," for the most part, so the layout of this article will need reworked to properly incorporate it.
--Schultz.Ryan 03:28, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: definitely merge this article into intelligent agents and move to intelligent agent -- the term "artificial intelligence agent" was made up by User:Melody on 10 august 2003, while trying to come to terms with this text from agent: "Agents generally --and including some software agents-- have the ability to learn and to reason, logically or otherwise. They may discover facts and rules about the world or about others and may assess and argue these truths and may alter their ontology". The term is used nowhere in academia, but has spread thru the GFDL corpus (wikipedia mirrors) -- 70.29.131.204 03:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

text: re bots: they're all bots; but in fact, the text could be properly divided into sections for learning agents and non-learning ones. Also, as we approach the technological singularity we learn how to learn -- ie: meta-learning, (which in humans is temporal lobe based ithink) and is a hallmark of sentience. -- 70.29.131.204 04:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Comments merged from Agent Environment''

message: Consider merging Intelligent agents into this page. It focuses on software "bots," for the most part, so the layout of this article will need reworked to properly incorporate it.
--Schultz.Ryan 03:28, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: definitely merge this article into intelligent agents and move to intelligent agent -- the term "artificial intelligence agent" was made up by User:Melody on 10 august 2003, while trying to come to terms with this text from agent: "Agents generally --and including some software agents-- have the ability to learn and to reason, logically or otherwise. They may discover facts and rules about the world or about others and may assess and argue these truths and may alter their ontology". The term is used nowhere in academia, but has spread thru the GFDL corpus (wikipedia mirrors) -- 70.29.131.204 03:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

text: re bots: they're all bots; but in fact, the text could be properly divided into sections for learning agents and non-learning ones. Also, as we approach the technological singularity we learn how to learn -- ie: meta-learning, (which in humans is temporal lobe based ithink) and is a hallmark of sentience. -- 70.29.131.204 04:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I suggest that this article be edited in any of the following ways:
* renamed to agent environment since this is what the greater part of this article is abount
* merged with software agent since it applies to them in general
* deleted since as mentioned above this naming is wrong and the topic is covered elsewhere
See intelligent agent --moxon 09:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: I suggest keeping this article separate from intelligent agent. Typically, in agents research, these things are thought separatelly. The features of artificial environemtns mentioned here are equally as important as features as agents, in fact, their are accepted generally as a de facto definitions of properties of artificial environemnts.
--User:Cyril2 14:33, 08 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I would keep it

message: re merge: Due to the extensive rework required for the suggested merger of the mentioned atricles, I took the libirty to create this article from scratch. As stated in their discussions artificial intelligence agent focuses on "agent environments" and intelligent agents on bot-type software agents. I suggest that these articles be renamed/merged as such. I do however invite the authors of those articles to contribute to this new article where appropriate. Please comment. --moxon 10:36, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Pls. see my comment there. superseded. Steipe (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "agents" / merge 

message: If it is interactive and adaptive, IMO it is an IA --moxon 12:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Different types of intelligent agents not related

message: The references on this page need a serious review! The first reference (Kasavbov) does not contain any of the information stated on the page. The relevant information might be somewhere else in the journal but it is not in the Introduction (which is referenced).
Further there are hyperlinks to references 3 and 4 that take you nowhere since references 3 and 4 don´t exist.  --Shadowselfs 07:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I am hoping to merge rational agent, intelligent agent and agent environment into a single article, since they all seem to be based on chapter 2 of . 
This would create a nice medium-sized article on a single topic from a major source. (So we can be sure how the topic is defined, that it is notable, and that the material is both relevant and verified).  Other related ideas (such as software agents with artificial intelligence, or agent (economics) can be covered in other articles, and the intro of intelligent agent will guide you there.
It seems this merge has a long history. Hopefully this will sort it out. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 17:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge complete 

message: :Um that simple intelligent agent image makes no sense. How can you have a if then condition which is unlinked to the original perception still influence the action? Shouldn't you have sensor "what is the environment like now" go into the agent, then the agent considers "if then" conditions then submit that to the "action to be taken" then to the "actuators" who send it back to the environment and the system? Sorry i don't normally take time doing anything in wikipedia except for reading it so i don't know how to edit the discussion area properly.. Thanks, skythra  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.158.15 (talk) 04:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what is meant is that the decision taken by the box 'action to be done' uses the information from the boxes that point towards it, so 'what the world is like right now' and 'condition-action (if-then) rules'. In that sense, the rules do use information of the perceptions that have been done. - Simeon (talk) 06:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Simple intelligent agent image

message: I spotted a major removal of content a while ago:  Is it a good idea to reinsert it? Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content 

message: Who is Kunal Shah? There's a mention to this person in the end of the page and nothing else... Greynodes (talk) 17:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kunal Shah 

message: The article talks about percepts, but the diagrams label them precepts (which confusingly means rules).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.65.73.201 (talk) 14:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percept vs. Precept 

message: The citation needed tag apparently has been affixed to this claim since October 2010. From Google, I can only find this source using the term: http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/wwwerg26701/gad-zyt.htm. Is this an adequate source? Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 19:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "For this reason, intelligent agents are sometimes called abstract intelligent agents (AIA)" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Intelligent agent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307161853/http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=abstract&id=239747 to http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=abstract&id=239747
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This was unsourced, WP:UNDUE weight, and not on topic. This is about Friendly AI or Machine ethics, not intelligent agents. ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 00:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut 

message: I find it really odd to see a whole page about intelligent agents and not one reference of the field behind its development, Computer Science. 2001:8A0:786B:F300:C94B:61EF:B3C6:C5EF (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing reference to Computer Science field 

message: Kuniyal to toda chutiya hai kya  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.191.48.98 (talk) 08:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kuniyal to toda chutiya hai kya