lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gary and Jerri-Ann Jacobs High Tech High Charter School

message: According to the HTH website Explorer Elementaryis also considered part of the HTH village (It occupies the same building as HTHMA and HTMMA) but it does not carry the High Tech High name. Is there any reason information on Explorer should not be added? I felt that I should check before editing. Jyuichi 07:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: website

message: For the vfd debate related to this article see Talk:Gary and Jerri-Ann Jacobs High Tech High Charter School/delete -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 17:09, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vfd debate 

message: High Tech High International does having separate pages add anything to the content as a whole? It seems to have the same information as this page. Jyuichi 04:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While the HTHI articles does have similar information, the two articles should not be merged as they are, indeed, different schools. I'll edit the HTHI page later on, to remove duplicate information. -Señor Lelandro 02:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge HTHI page? 

message: I understand there is a naming policy stating that the URL should be whatever it is best recognized as. Our school is most recognizable as High Tech High, and yet it re-directs to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Technology_High_School
Is it possible to get it to re-direct to this page instead of that? Or possibly a disambiguation page is in order?
:Disambiguation page is now in place. 68.107.120.181 (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: URL should be changed?

message: I really don't know much about High Tech High, and while most of the high school sounds very interesting to me, I do think that the sports sections need to have a little more of a Neutral Point of View, and also be "notable" if they are to be included in this article. --Pordaria (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV with Sports
Talk:Essenes

message: Would like to see someone with knowledge on the subject edit the page on the subject that it is widely believed that the Masons originated as Essenes. Then became the Poor fellow soldiers of Christ, then the knights Templar. When they fled to Scotland, they started the first Masons lodge Robertball118 (talk) 16:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: By whom? I have never heard this claim before 35.1.230.166 (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations between Essences and Masons
Talk:Wreck Beach

message: I can see your reasoning, Saxifrage, but I was just trying to make it consistent with the other headings, like "Trail 7".  Should that be changed, too?  Korky Day 07:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really—consistency isn't as important as accuracy. Since that section isn't very much about the trail and is about the Beach, and the following section is about the trail (and the associated beach, which is known more by the trail number than its own name), the sections are fairly accurately titled. — Saxifrage ✎ 07:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  renamed section to "Wreck Beach proper and Trail 6" - Trail 6 is much more widely known than Trails 7 or 4 and is almost synonymous with Wreck Beach at UBC.VicGuy (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  You took Trail 6 out of section heading 

message: The number of stairs is either unnecessarily mentioned twice (and wrong - is it 473 stairs or 542 stairs at Trail 6?), or one mention is about Trail 6 and the other is Trail 7, but only Trail 6 is mentioned (twice). I recall that Trail 6 (which is about the only trail I use) has over 500 stairs, so I suspect that the latter is the case.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.81.149.10 (talk) 07:56, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I changed in both places to "about 500 wooden steps" and mentioned once that the steps are set into the soil.  Also dropped the "factual accuracy" tag - I think it referred to this issue.VicGuy (talk) 08:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The number of stairs 

message: People seem to be confusing what we publish in an encyclopedia.  It is not what would be published in the Wikivoyage article which would cover the tourism and the day to day event level components. Things like parking, entry cost, toilets are not encyclopedic, they are tourism or directory related. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If people wish to write the Wikivoyage article it would be written to voy:en:Wreck Beach — billinghurst sDrewth 03:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedia, not tourist, article 

message: Seems we're being a bit coy when we say that .  What does that mean?  Marijuana?  Why not say so?  Something else?  Then what?  We're writing an encyclopaedia here, not a series of personal essays where hiding information might be all right. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 12:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I returned and removed it; if someone is clearer on what it means ~ and has a ref for it ~ feel free to revert me. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 07:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illicit crops
Talk:Tit-for-Tat

message: Tit-for-Tat was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
No idea what this is supposed to be about. Deb 18:02, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Maximum takeoff weight

message: I've included some information about air-density and its effect on MTOW.  Probably needs some editing, I'm not really happy with the flow, but couldn't figure a better way right now to express it.  I'll look it over later.
What more is required to get this out of stub-state?  Would it be useful to include example air-density calculations?  ---User:Atombaby 5 November 2004
—Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 5 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Maybe someone who knows more than I do could add a few words about the difference between MTOW and maximum ramp weight of an aircraft. BadaBoom (talk) 02:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: The usage and topic of  is under discussion, see talk:MGTOW and Talk:Men_Going_Their_Own_Way for two separate discussions. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The usage of mgtow was also affected (see talk:mgtow) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "MGTOW"

message: Seems to me like the article would benefit from some examples of takeoff weights, especially some typical values for commercial aircraft model, and maximal payloads.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.254.117 (talk) 23:48, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples? 

message: The article says that the following affect Max Permitted TOW:
:"Airfield altitude (height above sea-level) – This affects air pressure which affects maximum engine power or thrust.
:Air temperature – This affects air density which affects maximum engine power or thrust."
While it is certainly true that air density effects the output of both piston and jet engines, I have always understood that the more important effect of reduced air density was reduced lift. Is that not correct? .     Jim .  . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Density
Talk:Yard (sailing)

message: I don't know if it should be noted here, or not, that the expression sun over the yardarm comes from the English navy.  The  first rum of the day was issued when the sun rose over the topmost yardarm.  --138.88.209.243 19:39, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I removed the sentence below, not because it was missing a citation, but because when you follow the links to the wiki page about the ARM Cuauhtémoc (BE01), the photo of the ship clearly shows that the majority of the crew on the yards are standing in the footropes with the only notable exceptions being those stationed on the bunt near the mast where access to the foot ropes would have been impeded. -- Orion oxotnik (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manning the yards of the ARM Cuauhtémoc
Talk:Chelmsford 123

message: It looks like this is exactly the same as the information from . Silverfish 20:07, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, well at least we refer to the correct Emperor -- "Holy Roman Emperor" my foot! The HRE wasn't founded until about 800 if memory serves. -- Arwel 00:57, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: I am writing an article about all of the series which are in the same shared reality as this one through spin-offs and crossovers. I could use a little help expanding the article since it is currently extremely dense and a bit jumbled with some sentence structures being extremely repetitive. I would like to be able to put this article into article space soon. Any and all help in writing the article would be appreciated, even a comment or two on the talk page would help. Please give it a read through, also please do not comment here since I do not have all of the series on my watch list. - LA @ 16:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for help writing an article about the spin-offs and crossovers of this series 

message: The article currently reads "Both series are now available on 4 on Demand and SeeSaw.". The link to SeeSaw no longer works and I suspect that they no longer have the series there. Can someone either update the link (if it is available on SeeSaw) or remove it? 77.99.98.37 (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SeeSaw 

message: Seems much longer ago..thought it was early 80s.94.196.253.148 (talk) 23:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The first transmission dates stated on the page are correct. Nick Cooper (talk) 08:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1988-1990?
Talk:ZPP (complexity)

message: I think the definition is wrong on this page; machines recognizing languages in ZPP should always terminate in polynomial time, since machines recognizing languages in RP (and co-RP) do. This may be an alternate definition, but it's not consistent with the RP article. Can someone confirm this? Deco 20:17, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: (I edited the above to disambig the RP link. — Felix the Cassowary 10:50, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong definition 

message: I added a definition based on witnesses. This is a extension of seeing NP as guess-and-check, providing a P-time verifier to which the deux ex machina decides (correctly) the non-deterministic choices. I think this adds an important intuition for RP problems. This intuition is also provided by allow the Turing Machine to say I Don't Know, or to have 1-Sided Error, but these seem to be properties of the TM, not of the problem, and it might be helpful to emphasize that the complexity is inherent in the problem.
I also personally like the shocking notion that a random string is likely to be a proof. That does say something about the problem. 192.31.89.40 14:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More definitions 

message: It seems a small mistake: since RP has no false positive(if L is not in RP, RP will return NO definitely), I changed the LV algorithm in the part of proof "RP AND coRP is contained in ZPP".
original:Given an input in L, run A on the input. If it returns YES, the answer must be YES. Otherwise, run B on the input. If it returns NO, the answer must be NO. If neither occurs, repeat this step.
current:Given an input in L, run A on the input. If it returns NO, the answer must be NO, since RP has no false positive. Otherwise, run B on the input. If it returns YES, the answer must be YES, since coRP has no false negative. If neither occurs, repeat this step.
My fault. The original one is correct.
--Jarodwen (talk) 06:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're incorrect. The proof was correct before. RP has no false positive - that is, a positive result (a "YES") must be accurate. This is just what it originally said. Dcoetzee 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the proof of ZPP=RP AND coRP: LV algorithm error 

message: A nice addition to this article would be providing an example of a problem known to be in ZPP but which isn't known to be in P. The article Quadratic_residue#Prime_or_prime_power_modulus seems to provide one such example, but I am not familiar enough with the subject to confidently include it in this article myself. Deansg (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  An example of a language in ZPP but not in P
Talk:Dwayne Goettel

message: This article, like the one for Nivek Ogre, suffers from serious pretension and NPOV problems.  First, Goettel did not singlehandedly create the genre of audio sculpture "which had previously gone unimagined."  Edgar Varese is rolling in his grave and countless living musicians have burning ears.  Second, he is not generally known for his classical compositions, if these exist at all.  Labeling him a "late twentieth century classical composer" is a stretch when if anything he was a late twentieth century pop musician.  Third, there is no evidence that anyone, apart from the article author(s), "studied, emulated and revered" much of DRG's music.  It is a fact that he almost always performed with cEvin Key and each person's particular musical contributions are rarely discernible, especially in Skinny Puppy's thick mixes.  Fourth, his work (especially the non-existent classical work) is hardly "amongst the pivotal musical accomplishments of his era."  Skinny Puppy is an influential electronic band and DRG shares some of the credit for that, however we should not overstate his influence.
In short, this article reads like it was penned by a devoted fan wishing to inflate the facts.
:You're right about almost all of that, but actually it's often possible to pick out synth lines that are clearly Goettel's -- listen to the first three tracks on the Doubting Thomas album, then the Sister Machine Gun song "Night Returning" (with Goettel guesting), then Bites (pre-Goettel), then Mind: T.P.I (Goettel's debut with Skinny Puppy), and you'll have a template for telling Key and Goettel apart. Kaleja 18:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article could really use a photograph. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 21:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo.
Talk:Primitive Methodism in the United Kingdom

message: Who is "Werner", referred to twice in this article?  The name linked to a disambig page, so I left the name but removed the link.     Fredwerner 23:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werner 

message: The article states:
"In Wales, 1801, they warned their members against involvement in sorcery, magic, and witchcraft, and in 1816 fifty members of the Portland Methodist Society were struck off for maintaining belief in the supernatural. Not only does this demonstrate that the Wesleyan transition to denominational conservatism resulted in less toleration for alternate beliefs; it also demonstrates that there was less toleration for non-bourgeois beliefs."
This needs improving. Sentence 1 says the leadership warned their members against supernatural beliefs. Sentence 2 declares "it also demonstrates that there was less toleration for non-bourgeois beliefs". I don't think Sentence 2's conclusion can be drawn from Sentence 1. Where is there evidence in this piece (or references to other sources) that indicate that warning members against supernatural beliefs was a bourgeois position in Wales in the early 19th century? We need links to philosophical / belief views of the early 19th century Welsh bourgouisie to make this claim. --mgaved (talk) 09:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Less toleration for non-bourgeois beliefs"

message: This article is almost entirely about the very early history of the movement in England and does not belong merged in with the article about the still-extant small U.S. denomination.  75.252.119.134 (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?  NO!
Talk:NID (Stargate)

message: One question:  When was it revealed that NID was "National Intelligence Division"?  I can't remember it ever being called anything but NID in the series. KorbenDirewolf 21:08, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Intelligence Division? 

message: When this page was up for deletion so it could be renamed I noticed most of it talked about the rouge NID aka the Trust.. I don't see any reason why they should be two seperate pages.  So I propose we merge the two here and have Trust (Stargate) Redirect here, to the section on it. EnsRedShirt 08:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment If I could offer another commment, after the recent move of this page, I took it upon myself to go though all the articles with links to the old name (National Intelligence Division), and fix them. Most of the links were either articles about people who were not part of the Trust, or from episdoe summaries that occurred before the NID broke up. Linking to the Trust wouldn't make sense in most of the cases. Fan1967 00:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:El Loco

message: On June 3, 2013 Billy Gibbons stated in an interview to Joe Bosso (Joe Bosso is ex-Editor-in-Chief of Guitar World magazine and ex-Vice President of A&R at Island Records) of MusicRadar.Com: “This was a really interesting turning point (El Loco). We had befriended somebody who would become an influential associate, a guy named Linden Hudson. He was a gifted songwriter and had production skills that were leading the pack at times. He brought some elements to the forefront that helped reshape what ZZ Top were doing, starting in the studio and eventually to the live stage. “Linden had no fear and was eager to experiment in ways that would frighten most bands. But we followed suit, and the synthesizers started to show up on record. Manufacturers were looking for ways to stimulate sales, and these instruments started appearing on the market. “One of our favorite tracks was Groovy Little Hippie Pad. Right at the very opening, there it is – the heavy sound of a synthesizer. For us, there was no turning back.” (signed Texasman444)
IF you are to make the article page (of El Loco) accurate, the personnel listings at the bottom would say: Groovie Little Hippie Pad percussion effects and synthesizer by Linden Hudson. But then it appears that Wiki is just some kind of funky blog.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Texasman444 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: ============================

message: I presume this is vandalism, but Dusty Rusty?!? Rube Beers?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:624:6701:60B3:DCDC:7691:FD5F (talk) 04:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the deal with the Personnel section?
Talk:Elbow Cay

message: Elbow Cay was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP
Appears to be an ad for a Carribean island (?). It could merit an article, but the title needs clarification, and what's there now is just spam. -- Scott Burley 21:16, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC) Rewrite is much better, changing my vote to Keep. -- Scott Burley 05:34, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete: In this name, it's nonsense.  The content is "It's great! What more could you want?" etc.  No content, improper name (key lime pie on a Canadian island? thought that was a Florida thing), nothing to keep. Geogre 22:14, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: According to this CIA map and this map from the Cay Sal Bank article, there's [an]other place[s] in the Bahamas called Elbow Cay[s]. Not sure if this merits a disambiguation thingy or what, so for now I'll just mention it here and leave it to someone else who knows what they're doing, or knows more about the islands in question.  Fried Gold (talk) 14:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Many Elbow Cays?
Talk:Degüello

message: Forgive me if I'm wrong, but weren't the boys credited with performing saxophone on "She loves my autombile"?89.151.222.151 (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sax performance
Talk:Korteweg–De Vries equation

message: I think the equation should be (with a +6 rather than -6):
\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+6u\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial ^3 u}{\partial x^3}=0
This seems to be the case in the following two references: 
[1] https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.15.240
[2] https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/suppl/2019/07/15/1814058116.DCSupplemental/pnas.1814058116.sapp.pdf (Equation S4)
Can anyone explain this? Perhaps it should be included in the page as well for newcomers to this field (such as myself).— Preceding unsigned comment added by G-d (talk • contribs) 23:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sign error? 

message: The redirect Korteweg–deVriesequation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Colonies Chris (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Korteweg–deVriesequation]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Korteweg-deVriesequation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Colonies Chris (talk) 11:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Korteweg-deVriesequation]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]