Talk:Diamond Aircraft Industries

message: The gallery section in this article contains one photo showing some Diamond aircraft in high grass in the far distance. I think it is a rather poor quality picture and adds nothing to this article. Does any other editor think it should be retained? - Ahunt (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Lacking any objections it will be removed - Ahunt (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery photo

message: User:Crwwpd1 has now twice deleted the section of Diamond's reaction to the economic downturn, including lay-offs, even though the section was properly cited, saying in the edit summary: deleted unnecessary references to economic downturn. Just about all other aircraft manufacturer articles include information on this subject including:
*Cessna#2008_economic_crisis
*Piper_Aircraft#2008.2F09_economic_crisis
*Hawker_Beechcraft#2008_economic_crisis
*Adam_Aircraft_Industries#2008_suspension_of_development
*Cirrus_Design#October_2008_economic_downturn
Since the current economic situation is having a huge and lasting impact on the industry I do not agree that this section should be deleted from this article. Since this section is properly cited and its deletion has been challenged, a consensus is required to remove it. Other than User:Crwwpd1, does anyone else working on this article think it should be deleted? 
User:Crwwpd1: Please explain why you think this is "unnecessary" to the history of this company, when it is relevant to the history of all other GA manufacturers. Because this deletion might be construed as removing unfavourable information on this company and because this is the only article you have edited please also indicate if you have any connection to this company.- Ahunt (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto to the above comment. Stating the obvious, WP:BRD applies here. Noting the changes in a company's fortunes is not "bad form", it is merely recording history. I am not sure that it requires a "sub-section" however. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 11:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree that there is no need for it to be a separate section in the case of this company. Many other companies have had numerous staged lay-offs and so a separate section is probably justified in those cases. I have integrated the section into the history, by removing the title. - Ahunt (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 economic downturn

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Diamond Aircraft Industries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110909062744/http://www.diamondaircraft.com/why/history.php to http://www.diamondaircraft.com/why/history.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229005026/http://www.diamondaircraft.com/news/news-article.php?id=132 to http://www.diamondaircraft.com/news/news-article.php?id=132
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified