lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Delphi method

message: Several uses of that (and 'unstructured') without explaining what it means. 89.241.109.150 (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "structured" 

message: @Uclneaxel: Since I'm unsure how this highly detailed sentence which you contributed here fits into the broader context, I'm moving it here for possible comment: The Delphi approach has been successfully employed to improve agreement between experts in iterative rating exercises on clinical test results using inter-rater kappa statistics as an outcome measure.
86.161.190.114 (talk) 15:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I agree. Uclneaxel (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some moved content
Talk:Tanya Savicheva

message: It would probably be unclear to readers unfamiliar with the Cyrillic alphabet that the letters Savicheva chose for each note corresponded to the names of the people who had died.
Letter	Person      	Cyrillic
Ж     	Zhenya      	Женя
Б     	Grandma     	Бабушка
Л     	Lyoka       	Лёка
Д     	Uncle Vasya 	Дядя Вася
Л     	Uncle Lyosha	Дядя Лёша
М     	Mama        	Мама
Maybe this information could be incorporated into the article somehow. 2601:644:0:DBD0:9038:733A:5C9A:BB85 (talk) 05:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in the back of beyond with little internet. I suggest you add a sentence explaining after the first letter, Leka. Or I can do it when i am back in civilisation! Mramoeba (talk) 14:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Yes that would make sense! Thanks Mramoeba (talk) 16:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letters and names 

message: The infobox exists to represent(s) a summary of information about the subject of an article. In this way, they are comparable to data tables in some aspects. and template doc states "Names of siblings or other relatives; include only if independently notable or particularly relevant. For multiple entries, use an inline list." Considering the subject matter of the article, in which all listed were the primary subject of the diary and died in succession during the seige of Leningrad and were recorded by Savicheva, this information should either be in the infobox summary, or at the least copied to the body of the article should other editors have a preference to remove it. It could also be changed to an inline list, but it shouldn't be deleted entirely as it is a "summary of information about the subject of an article". Mramoeba (talk) 09:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Office toy

message: Pin Art... is... a rock?  What?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.170.62.95 (talk) 21:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pin Art description 

message: Let's just delete Office Toys and redirect the link. There is no new information to be found in the other article. Merging would be useless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.72.87 (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rather than merge...

message: "The first executive toy may have been a gadget designed by the great mathematician and engineer Philo of Byzantium (about 280 BC - about 220 BC), an octagon-shaped ink pot with openings on each side. One could turn the pot so that any face is on top and dip the pen in the opening, but the ink never ran out through the holes on other sides. The inkwell was suspended in the centre on a series of gimbals and remained stationary in spite of any rotation."
As written, this makes no sense. Someone needs to fix it. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: wha...?
Talk:Zilog

message: Should the Game Boy be listed as a use of the Z80? The Game Boy page contradicts this describing the processor as a custom Sharp. A derivative of the 8080 and Z80 but not a Z80.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwardCawley (talk • contribs) 10:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Currently, the official website https://zilog.com shows a logo that says:
zilog
A Littelfuse Company
Since 2019, apparently, Littelfuse has replaced the name of its subsidiary IXYS in the Zilog logo with its own name.  Someone with a WP account should update the logo in this article, or at least delete the IXYS reference from it. It probably would also be a good idea to review and update, as appropriate, the other data in the infobox at this time; some of it is over 10 years stale.
173.49.17.172 (talk) 07:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo needs updating
Talk:Haein Temple

message: The Hanja doesn't show up correctly in my browser... is it broken? DiruWiki 21:51, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I didn't know the Hanja, so I put in 2 question marks.  I just looked up the Hanja now on the Haeinsa Website and have added them.  --Sewing 22:22, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:List of calculus topics

message: Actually I think alphabetizing destroys the logical order of the topics, of help to students. Revert, please.
Charles Matthews 08:12, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article lists "Limits" as a subsection of pre-calculus. Is this "right"? I take limits to be the heart of calculus, rather than a pre-calculus topic. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limits
Talk:Jinni

message: Jinn and Djinn are variant transliterations of the same Arabic word. It is superfluous to have two separate articles.
It can be debated which of the two should be selected for heading of the article. (Personally, I should prefer Jinn.)
Jinn is the plural; the singular is jinni.
See also Genie.
Sebastjan
:Yes, they definitely should be merged. Ausir 03:17, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants 

message: I've moved the short case-study 'Genie' from the page of that name, allowing that page to take the text from Jinni. Not only was it intuitively appropriate, but some 30 internal links to Genie virtually all refer to genies, not Feral children. Heenan73 17:51, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genie - Changes 

message: I have redirected this to the dab page which now contains 4 items. Thanks, SqueakBox talk contribs 15:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There can be any number of ambiguous entries. The base name points the the primary topic if there is one, and to the dab page if there isn't. In this case, the primary topic is the topic covered by the article at Genie. If you'd like to have the disambiguation page Jinni (disambiguation) move to the base name (here), now that it's obviously controversial, please see WP:RM. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab page
Talk:Karl-Otto Koch

message: Wiki loves pointing out Jews except when they are Nazis and Commies and gangsters and murderers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.21.192.21 (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Any refs?--Taribuk (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why no mention of his Jewish Ancestry?

message: one week before the American liberators arrived, Col. Koch was arrested and executed in August 1943 by the Nazis
This seems to imply that the Americans liberated Buchenwald in August or September 1943. According to good sources, the liberation did not take place until April 1945.
Sebastjan
:You are right, I checked with . August 1943 was his arresting, the execution was don in 1945, one week before the liberation. I fixed the article. andy 08:56, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any reason why his first wife's name shouldn't be mentioned in this article? Rklawton (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: First wife

message: The date of his marriage to Ilse contradicts the date in the German language version of this article. This may warrant some additional research. Rklawton (talk) 01:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Second wife
Talk:List of delegates to the Continental Congress

message: this should be split between first and second
: agreed. They should also be ordered by state since the category :Category:Continental Congressmen already lists them in alphabetical order. BradMajors (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . We now have all of the above, thanks to sortable lists, and a separate list at First Continental Congress. —Kevin Myers 22:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The X is explained in the text. Did you miss that, or was the explanation unclear? —Kevin Myers 06:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article on Edward Telfair mentions that he served in the Continental Congress, however this list of delegates does not include him.  Which is true?  Elsquared (talk) 05:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He did serve. Checking the page history, he was previously listed here but was omitted, presumably accidentally, when someone reformatted the page. Thanks for pointing out the error. Hopefully I've fixed it correctly. Kevin1776 (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward Telfair
Wikipedia talk:Users in conflict

message: I support the idea of changing the name from Wikipedia:problem users to Wikipedia:users in conflict. Often, people who have labelled other users "a problem" are themselves "problems". We would do well to recast the situation as a conflict between users rather than to demonize one user. Also, the resolution may come quicker if we try to deal with the conflict rather than trying to decide what to do with a a user. --Uncle Ed 14:52, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Laparotomy

message: A laparotomy does not use a laparoscope.  A laparoscope is used in laparoscopy.  I am deleting the phrase. David Stapleton 15:56, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it is rarely used, but some authors such as E. E. Moore still favour it. On these grounds I decided to restore the sentence.--Iglesias 22:55, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Table

message:  Merged — FREAK OF NURxTURE ([ TALK]) 13:18, Jan. 3, 2006
Article was copied, then redirected.  I've moved/swapped this Talk page, so that both sides are in sync from the point of view of the readers.  Now, the histories need to be merged, and both put back at "Table (disambiguation)" with the redirect at "Table", especially as this was an example in MoS:DP. --William Allen Simpson 12:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixing cut and paste move 

message: hey, can anybody help me to tell me what a wikitable is?   maybe it should be included on the article page?
:Try WP:TABLE. And please remember to sign your posts with ~~~~ -- Alarob 23:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikitable 

message: Several recent edits have repeatedly added a link to COBOL to the tables entry on this page.  Please read the relevant section of the manual of style, specifically the second bullet here.  Heavy linking is typically encouraged in articles, but a disambiguation page is not an article, it's a navigation aid. As that part of the MOS indicates, entries on disambiguation pages should have only one link.  The idea is that a reader who has identified which entry matches their need can immediately see what to click on, with no confusion.  In this case, I think an example is fine (as long as the entry is not too long), but it should not be linked, e.g.: 
*Arrays are called tables in some programming languages, e.g., COBOL
—johndburger 15:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of style 

message: Две "ноги" под одной стороной стола обычные. Две другие - как если прикреплены к превёрнутым детским качелям. 
Как качатьця если с другой стороны две ноги упёртые также как эти ?! ) 
P.S. Для "стремянок" было бы хорошо. (с широкими копытами, раскидными))) 
176.59.203.223 (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looked as athers.
Talk:Hungarian cuisine

message: The photo at töltött paprika is about a similar food, punjena paprika. That does not look like the Hungarian one, which is made of Hungarian wax pepper. And served with sweet tomato sauce and optionally boiled potatoes. Anyone, please contribute an authentic photo, please. Gerbolya (talk) 14:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Töltött paprika photo
Talk:Kathleen Ferrier

message: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Kathleen Ferrier --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFAR 

message: The article ends "In the 21st century, Ferrier's recordings still sell hundreds of thousands of copies each year."  This is supported by two citations but one is dated 1997 and so pre-dates the 21st century.  The other is dated 2012 and doesn't seem to have any hard evidence.  As recording sales in general are much reduced now that streaming has mostly supplanted physical media, the claim for each year of this century needs work. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The ‘97 reference covers different information, I think, while the 2012 reference states “her recordings still sell in hundreds of thousands worldwide”. Yes, a more recent cite could be added to reinforce it, but the thought we need to show citations “for each year of this century”, that’s rather derisible. - SchroCat (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Per the recent FA, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.  As there's no recent sales figures, the claim was amended to "In the early 21st century, Ferrier's recordings were still selling hundreds of thousands of copies each year." Andrew🐉(talk) 07:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not an extraordinary claim and no extraordinary evidence is needed. Citations for every year of the century? Utterly laughable. - SchroCat (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Her recordings do remain popular and are frequently reissued, but I agree that the 'hundreds of thousands' assertion does sound rather dubious. Classical recordings of any sort rarely sell in those quantities. I think the claim should be weakened to something like 'large quantities' if a more specific ref can't be found. --Ef80 (talk) 14:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Telegraph article on her refers to sales in the "hundreds of thousands", so no weakening is needed. - SchroCat (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's a strong enough ref given the implausibility of the assertion, but I won't continue to press the point. --Ef80 (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales
Talk:Robert Volkmann

message: The article mentions a playing of a Volkmann recording years ago by the CBC. As I write this, I'm listening to WCPE, they're playing his Serenade. Is there any source we can cite for radio play of obscure composers? Jindřichův Smith 20:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volkmann's radio play 

message: Some sources, including Grove V, say he died on 29 October 1883.  Anyone know why one version is true and the other isn't?  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  07:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:Harold Shapero

message: This page is based on a webpage I wrote up about Harold Shapero on Tripod. I posted it here to Wikipedia, give permission for it to be used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
--It's a little repetitive, and because of that, needs to be cleaned up a bit, I think.  Scott Scheule
:Go ahead. That's the whole point of Wikipedia. Del arte 22:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation

message: I've made a half-hearted attempt at splitting this into sections, just inserting headers here and there with no other change to the text. This can surely be improved on by someone familiar with the composer. - dcljr (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article was raised by a bot to B, because another project (Biography) had rated it B.  This article does not merit a B rating; it is a very spare summary of the subject's professional career.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 14:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Hart Stores

message: And what do they sell? We don't want users to have to go to the store website, do we?  --KF 19:38, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: store type

message: I think they're closing CompuSmart. There's article in the Edmonton Journal about it. 132.205.44.134 21:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CompuSmart
Talk:Table (information)

message: I'm really pleased that what started as an overly detailed aid to disamb. is turning into an interesting article.  But my agenda re this article is completing cleanup of the disambiguation of Table.
IMO that cleanup will be facilitated if this article can be refactored into up to 3 articles:
#table (visual information interface)
#table (application program feature)
#table (programming technique)
(As i note at talk:Table, that also calls for at least a stub,
*table (programming language feature)
which may not need to be further mentioned here.)
Tentatively i suspect part of this article should go into Array rather than one of the articles already mentioned.
I'm going to try to outline that division, using section headings, on the article itself, rather than make a copy for this talk page; as the period of rapid editing by several of us may not be over, that may help us keep the refactoring plan in step with the development of the content, as any discussion of refactoring progresses.  --Jerzy 19:55, 10 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  It would help if you put a headline above your contributions 

message: I think it would be valuable to find out when displaying data in tables first began to be used (in printed form). Possibly it began with just ruling lines down a page. martyvis (talk) 03:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I think someone should write about tables in Web design and how they were used for layout and such. People still use table for layout.
I contribute to a Wiki on Gamepedia and noticed there are a lot of infoboxes that use the  element for lazy design. Are headings even consistent with standards? See the following example: https://ancestors.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Infobox_item&oldid=4228 --Philippemorin123 (talk) 03:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table and Web design 

message: In the field of data analysis/science, I believe the term variable is synonymous to columns in tabular representations. I would suggest that it be included. BroVic (talk) 09:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Column synonyms
Talk:Craven A

message: This article uses Craven A, Craven 'A' and Craven "A" interchangeably, almost at random. Vintage packaging and advertising consistently seems to use Craven "A", but contemporary material from British American Tobacco uses Craven A. Which should be used? 16:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency in naming 

message: The History section reads as if there should be a preceding paragraph or two. Whois 'Baron' for example? Any ideas about how to address this? jxm (talk) 13:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This refers to Bernhard Baron. I have adjusted the text based on his article and Carreras Tobacco Company. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History - missing material?
Talk:History of Uganda

message: The page is too long. Please break this up into series, like History of Cambodia, History of Afghanistan, etc. --Jiang 18:11, 20 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Someone needs to update this with the 2006 election results. I don't have time - exam tomorrow!
:I updated this.  LarryQ 18:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Needed 

message: More information on the Batwa people (the "pygmies" referred to) would be helpful.
these people - http://www.chr.up.ac.za/
would probably give permission to quote this document - http://www.chr.up.ac.za/hr_docs/documents/FPP-UOBDU-IWGIA%20supplemental%20ACHPR%20report%20on%20Uganda%2030%2010%2006.doc
but I'm sure there's other sources24.17.178.36 (talk) 20:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batwa 
Talk:Anton Bruckner

message: Please explain who the Cecilians were/are. Sdgard (talk) 21:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia page Cecilian Movement. I have added the link. Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 07:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  'The Cecilians wanted to rid church music of instruments entirely.
Talk:Liberation theology

message: its a commission of the United Nations 186.74.46.67 (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  its correct to call cepal a leftist think tank? 

message: I propose cutting the middle paragraph (it begins with "The Brazilian Catholic Church, in the world's largest Catholic country, is arguably one of the most theologically progressive...") because it goes into too much detail. The comparable subsections (Dalit etc) are much shorter. I propose moving this content to the article on LT in Latin America. Melchior2006 (talk) 06:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. By the way, the text was already there!! Melchior2006 (talk) 06:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsection on Latin America 

message: The redirect List of liberation theologians has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 15:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:List of liberation theologians]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The christian peace movement has been associated with liberation theology in many ways. The participating theologians were (are) in all continents and countries, including countries with a christian minority. A central theme has been peace as a way of redemption and liberation.JohnEC Jr (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peace Movement 

message: Add this: The Secret Roots of Liberation Theology 
https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/04/secret-roots-liberation-theology/ 216.58.27.4 (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add this: The Secret Roots of Liberation Theology https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/04/secret-roots-liberation-theology/
Talk:Yalu River

message: The image of the bridge, and the half completed bridge, shows a caption of "Two Bridges" when the photograph clearly shows both the completed bridge and the half bridge. Caption Two bridges crossing the Yalu, when in fact there are only one that crosses,
so its either the two bridges ON the Yalu, or The Yalu crossing at Dandong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.132.142.172 (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have amended this. The other bridge, the "Broken Bridge", was damaged in the Korean War and not repaired.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two bridges ? 

message: The article on "Corea" in the 9th edition of the Britannica includes the passage
:Corea is well furnished with rivers and streams. In the north the boundary line is mainly marked by two of considerable size, the Ya-lu-kiang and the Mi-kiang. The former, known to the Chinese as the Aye-kiang, and to the Coreans as Am-no-kang, or the river of the Green Duck, receives numerous affluents in the early part of its course, flows first north-west and then south-west, and falls into the Yellow Sea by three distinct mouths. Its most important tributary, the Tong-kia-ula, comes from the Shan-alin Mountains in Manchuria, and forms its junction about 40° 50′ N. lat. 
So... obviously the "Chinese name" of the Yalu is "Yalu" and the etymology is a straightforward mistake. Ya-lu-kiang is just the 19th century version of Yalu Jiang, like Mi-kiang is the Mijiang, Am-no-kang is the Amnok Gang, and Tong-kia-ula and Shan-alin are Manchu names. But what the heck is the "Aye-kiang"? This article has no idea; the rest of Wiki has no idea; Baidu has no idea; Baike.com has no idea; Google is only able to point out that Britannica is cribbing Alexander Williamson's Journeys in North China...
I assume that it was Williamson misreporting a traveler to Andong or Uiju talking about the Ai (靉河, Àihé, "Misty Creek"), one of the Yalu's major right-hand tributaries, but is there any record of the Chinese using that name for the lower courses of the Yalu? — LlywelynII 15:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Aye River