lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UnionFS

message: What is meant by  ad-hoc snapshotting system here in the article? Hirzel 12:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I this that unionfs is "ad-hoc" due to fact that it was not designed for this purporse and more appropriate snapshoting systems exist. --Alvin-cs ✉ 22:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ad-hoc snapshotting system

message: The union file system is not Linux only, but is on FreeBSD as well - and has existed there much longer, as well.
The way the article is written, it does not seem to be able to make up its mind whether the article is Linux-specific or not... <SPAN STYLE="font-family:monospace; color:#006666; background-color:#ffff99; border-color:#ff0000; border-width:1px; border-style:solid; "> DavidDouthitt </SPAN> (Talk) 14:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linux only? 

message: I recall having used DEC-VAX search-path in VAX-OS -- the search path could be setup just as a layered directory, where the write would go to the top layer.
Im suspect that pre-dates any SunOS work.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.102.19 (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUN 'first' assersion? 

message: Does NOT allow balancing filesystem usage. Does NOT allow hardlinks in the merged volume. Is user-space, based on FUSE. Works well on multiple writable volumes (better than AUFSv1 imho.) 
BTW, AUFS does filesystem usage balancing on create, and this works admirably well. Moves are more of a problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.57.233.159 (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Mhddfs 

message: In the absence of a reliable source spelling it with StudlyCaps, this article ought to be moved to "unionfs" (all lower case) to match the name by which it is most commonly known.
Also, the article suffers from the usual confusion between union mounts, an operating-system feature,  and unionfs, the copy-on-write filesystem implementation which uses that feature.   174.214.250.80 (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I can't find any sources that call it "UnionFS". It's referred to as "Unionfs" (the system), or "unionfs" (the program and package identifier). Krinkle (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for StudlyCaps? 
Talk:Red-faced spider monkey

message: == Scientific name ==
What is the scientific name of this species? I suspect it's already covered under another name within the genus Ateles. Ucucha 21:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it is: merged and redirected to Red-faced Spider Monkey (I did'nt sign this edit yesterday). —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 17:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cut here in case this page were to be mistakenly listed at WP:NCM. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 20:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut from Talk:Black spider monkey 

message: I'm going by the newest, not-yet released IUCN Status, 3.2, which I received from my cousin-in-law, and it states that the red-faced spider monkey (legally named by the IUCN black spider monkey) is not qualified for any of the stats, thus giving it the status "data deficient," and this morning I changed it. Yet, somebody changed it back. Let me guess, I should go by 3.1... Well, the problem is, we always go by the newest stats on Wikipedia, and 3.2 is the newest. So I'm rechanging it. Regards, Belugaboy535136 Leave him a message, why don't you? 18:08, 1 January 2010 (CST)
::This section was removed by Belugaboy535136. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 20:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN Status
Talk:White-bellied spider monkey

message: Cody, you're off to excellent start. You have a lot of room to work with on this article so try to focus on more general topics. I propose investigating the diet or reproduction of the species. Good luck!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpopski13 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just removed the following comment from the article body, which referred to the section on dentition:
(Why is the format of this species teeth so important that it deserves its own section? Is it very unusual from other similar species? There is a section needed for the species life cycle and how it survives, meaning food, and what climate would you observe this species in.)
Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dentition
Talk:Brown spider monkey

message: Just noticed the revert - the IUCN red list does refer to A. h. hybridus and bruneus as different subspecies  and distinguishes between their habitats. Is there a more recent reference that lists 'A. h. hybridus and bruneus as synonyms?
Andqso 22:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The IUCN redlist entry is from the 2003 assessment. The 3rd edition of the Mammal Species of the World is from 2005, and it lists bruneus as a synonym. - UtherSRG (talk) 05:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subspecies 

message: — Assignment last updated by Sjwagne1 (talk) 14:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology
Talk:Black-headed spider monkey

message: The title of this page is "Black-headed spider monkey," but throughout the article, it is referred to as the "black-handed spider monkey."  I don't know which is correct, but would appreciate some knowledgeable person correcting it. Tennesseellum (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Black-headed" or "black-handed"? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Eguiamot (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Genetics
Talk:Jewelled Antler

message: This article failed to gather consensus for deletion. Johnleemk | Talk 13:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed AFD
Talk:Tan Siew Sin

message: It is rather strange that a biography does not include what the person did in his life, instead only mentioning his early life and death. Tan Siew Sin is an important financial minister who played a role in the shaping of Malaya, and even in the separation of Malaya and Singapore, creating Malaysia and Singapore. It would be good to mention:
- His work : policies he made, and so on
- Controversies : debates surrounding his economic policies, dispute with Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, then prime minister of Singapore
Cheers,
Tjelong  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjelong (talk • contribs) 14:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work, life, and controversies 

message: Bold text
There will be a play held in Istana Budaya from 29/2-5/3 displaying the Fathers of Malaysian Independence with Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tun Sambathan and Tun Tan Siew Sin (played by Dr. Peter Low Meng Tuck)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.67.166 (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLAY on TUN SAMBATHAN with TAN SIEW SIN 
Talk:Masahiro Chono

message: The article notes "In a match against WCW's Bill Goldberg, Chono supposedly "shot the match" (actually hurting the opponent) and dislocated his shoulder. Given Goldberg's temperament and abuse of other wrestlers, it would stand to reason his actions and personality would conflict with NJPW employees seeing as how Japanese pro-wrestling puts more emphasis on the match instead of the gimmick." The sentence in italics doesn't make any sense. What are we trying to say here? Patiwat 06:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goldberg "shoot" - unclear wording 

message: I think this is a incredibly important for obvious reasons considering NJPW is arguably the biggest promotion in Japan. Thus him booking the promotion is a big deal. Punch999 (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article doesn't even mention that Chono books and runs NJPW's Premium brand. 
Talk:White-eared titi monkey

message: Hi and sry for my bad English! I translating this article into czech Wikipedia now. This article is there evaluated as a "good", but for me it does not fulfill the criteria. Description is very short, Habitat and distribution is short too. About reproduction is not information. It is very bad "GA". --OJJ (talk) 09:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For example, that is a nice GA. --OJJ (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article?
Talk:Araraquara

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
The coordinates actually refer to the city of Presidente Prudente - SP, Brazil away some 400+ km from referenced city of Araraquara. More accurate coordinates for Araraquara would be -21.794794, -48.175966.
187.8.184.2 (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:The Ghost Busters

message: It should be noted that RTV started broadcasting this version of The Ghost Busters, as of July 2, replacing the animated version.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.249.250 (talk) 12:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTV 

message: It was called "Ghost Busters" had 3 protagonists and a "Dematerializer gun". How could they NOT have sued the rip off movie?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:1128:8098:0:E386:C376:6A73 (talk) 16:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit Obvious
Talk:Official Secrets Act

message: Since this was enacted in 1911 and superseded in 1920, shouldn't the act's area of applicability include all of Ireland, not just Northern Ireland? 209.195.164.34 22:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jurisdiction of 1911 Act

message: Hopiakuta 07:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pig's Bay, Essex for a guess, as per the Shoeburyness article.  Why? --Red King 20:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is "[[Shoeburyness]] Artillery", please??

message: Update: Some time ago this page was briefly moved to Official Secrets Act (United Kingdom) and then moved back agin. That page is now a redirect to this article. The links which were pointing at that page have now been expunged with the exception of one link on a user subpage.James500 (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect "Official Secrets Act (United Kingdom)" 

message: The article discusses "signing" the OSA. I was under the impression that this was a bit of a popular misunderstanding and that what one actually does is to sign a document confirming that one's "attention has been drawn to" the Act. If this is the case we should clarify this rather than perpetuating what's almost an urban myth. – Kieran T (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signing
Talk:.aq

message: "Conventional internet connection can only be accomplished through the use of a satellite connection system or satellite based devices."
How is this relevant to the top-level domain of antarctica? Internet connectivity in a territory isn't related to the use of top-level domains. At least, some more explanation is needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antony1024 (talk • contribs) 10:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet Connection 

message: Clicking the Registration Form link brings up a 404 error. I went to the website that hosted said document and it takes a long time to load. (It's most likely down by the looks of it) ZuM4 03x (talk) 06:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Registration form" a dead link?
Talk:Assembly of Notables

message: To whom it may concern:
I am a student at George Mason University that will be adding to this topic per a school assignment for a Western Civilization class. Thanks, Hsattar1 (talk) 21:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's good to have a page on this. There was also an Assembly of Notables in August 1560 at Fontainebleau. qp10qp (talk) 23:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding...

message: What was so great about "the great Code Michau 1629"? It's got an article in French but not in English, btw. Bazuz (talk) 09:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code Michau 1629 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jaschale (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: SSC198
Talk:Main distribution frame

message: This article can easily have a photograph since the subject in question is very common. Evry building petty much have one. The image would also be more descriptive
Something would help; it's not very useful as is. I'm none the wiser having read it tbh. - Tim 15/11/06 16:00:00 AESDT— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.5.155.234 (talk) 04:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:TPG (Internet service provider)

message: Following the merger of TPG Telecom and Vodafone (Australia), there is some confusion.
*TPG Telecom opens with: 
*Vodafone (Australia) opens with: 
To clear it up, propose that the articles be merged. Talaceninh (talk) 05:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The article TPG Telecom Limited was about the company most recently known as Vodafone Hutchison Australia Limited, which renamed to TPG Telecom Limited, I think on 13 july 2020. Is it worth having a separate article for the Vodafone-branded divisions of the company?  ghouston (talk) 04:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

text: * I'm not sure. There isn't any "new parent company", just a renaming of Vodafone. If we want an article for the Vodafone-branded services, I suggest creating a new one for that. In any case, it doesn't seem to be necessary to merge anything. ghouston (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

text: * It looks fine, I closed the merge request since it seems to have been resolved. ghouston (talk) 04:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 
Talk:Mongolian Social Democratic Party

message: An anonymous person left a comment that the
Mongolian spelling for the word New is wrong. Instead of "Shinz" it should be "Shine".
Can anyone confirm this?  The party website seems to be down at the moment.  aliceinlampyland 14:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: "Mongolian Social Democratic Party" united with "Mongolian Democratic Party" and the merger party is called as Democratic Party of Mongolia. It was the part of the Motherland - Democracy Coalition and have total 34 seats at the Mongolian Parliament.
Mongolian New Socialist Democratic Party does not have any seat at the Parliament. It is a new small party. It has similar policy with ex-communist party Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party. i.e. Mongolian Social Democratic Party and Mongolian New Socialist Democratic Party are contradictory parties. 
Lemonhead 16:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please edit the header to Mongolian Social Democratic Party

message: While the article says that the MSDP was founded in 1990, the only source given states that the MSDP was founded in 2004. Wich one is correct?. Also, if the MSDP merged into the Democratic Party (DP) in 2000, how could it present itself to the 2012 elections? And finally, if the MSDP is still member of the Socialist International and its still member of the DP, how could be this last one member of the IDU?. Too many contradictions in this article...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 23:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Still looking for better sourcing, but Encyclopedia Britannica claims that MSDP merely formed an alliance with the MNDP and other parties, creating the Democratic Alliance prior to the 1996 elections. Nations Encyclopedia confirms this, though names the alliance the Democratic Union Coalition. Both sources agree that this coalition/alliance won 50 of 76 seats in that election. Both sources also agree that the coalition split prior to the July 2000 elections, with NE explicitly stating that the MSDP left the coalition at that time. Neither source appears to be able to reconcile InfoMongolia's claim of the MSDP being founded in 2004. Regarding the IDU/Socialist International claim, I don't see anything about that in either of the encyclopedia articles, but I am not seeing that we are, or even were, making such a claim in our article. CThomas3 (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 or 2004? MSDP or DP? SI or IDU? 
Talk:Politics of Solomon Islands

message: Does anyone else think it might be a good idea to shrink the size of Liz' mugshot on this page?  I don't know how to do that, yet.  aliceinlampyland 14:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen's Picture

message: I found this article very interesting and wonder if there is some evidence to support the claim that RAMSI is falsely credited with bringing peace to the area. If it was in fact women's groups who brought peace this needs to be more widely reported. --Anon
What you see on television doesn't often reflect the reality of what many people do behind the scenes.
See  and  --entheos 00:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAMSI 

message: I just went through the article and removed a heap of POV pushing. If anyone actually has credible sources backing up any of it, post them. --RaiderAspect 08:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of claims 

message: Anon user, thank you for your interest in this article. Some comments
-The bribery claim seems well verified
-Corruption allegation about Kemakeza has been moved to his article. I think it deserves fuller treatment, and I cant really see a way to work it into the article at the moment.
-Everything I've read has said the rioting was largely spontaneous. Most of the criticism of RAMSI was that it reacted to slowly, not too brutally. I'll take another look at the media reports of the time though.
Cheers,
--RaiderAspect 06:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements to the article 

message: Adam Carr has the results from the 2010 election. I am no good with boxes, but someone should replace the 2006 results  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orakologen (talk • contribs) 22:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 election 

message: Appeals do not lie to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. See Bade v The Queen (Solomon Islands) [2016] UKPC 14 (8 June 2016)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.160.126.35 (talk) 09:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeals 
Talk:List of cruise lines

message: Soviet Union??? Where is that? --83.32.112.18 (talk) 19:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet Union?

message: I'm going to add back the defunct cruise lines, as this list should include them also. --Funandtrvl (talk) 23:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding list 

message: Is the modern-day Blue Star Line Pty (with its Titanic II) related to the older Blue Star Line? If not, they should have separate entries. —92.27.34.75 (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue Star Line 

message: Portside isn't a Cruise Line, it's a crew recruitment agency. Brazil has no Cruise Line. It shouldn't be on this list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.106.216.170 (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portside 

message: Article needs updates regarding Genting and it's subsidiary cruise brands in view of 2022 bankruptcy.
Possibly others too, because of significant disruption to the industry due to Covid pandemic.
2.29.83.39 (talk) 12:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting Cruises Bankruptcy 

message: Should house flags and logos be added? IonlyPlayz2 (talk) 13:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  House Flags and Logos
Talk:List of left-wing internationals

message: The Fourth International does exist: it's not historical.
:Yes. I have updated the template to reflect that. Historical is a little opaque: Defunct seems like a better term for organisations which no longer exist. --Duncan (talk) 23:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has added the FI back in to the defunct section again. with the dates 1938-1963. Clearly the only change in 1963 was the reunification: that makes no sense as a date. --Duncan (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Histrical

message: Labelling one subsection "Communist/Socialist" implies the next subsection is not socialist. When it is, of course, socialist. Jacob Haller 03:55, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If we feel that anarchism is a form of socialism, then 'Marxist' might be a good alternative for 'Communist/Socialist'. --Duncan 08:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be any need to have two lists.  I've combined them; the new list is still annotated and is not excessively long. Warofdreams talk 14:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That looks good to me. And whether or not anarchism must be socialism (a persistent debate), the IWA at least, if not all the anarchist orgs in question, is/are socialist. Jacob Haller 15:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: These two tendencies don't fit in the list of Trotskyist tendencies, because they have not been trotskyist for some decades. 
*International Leninist Current (ILC) 
*Pathfinder tendency, or Communist Leagues aligned with the Socialist Workers Party (US)
However, this page is mainloy about *real* internationals, as opposed to networks and currents of organisations. Should they be added to this page?
However, this list is about real internationals, as opposed to networks and currents of organisations. Should they be added to this page? --Duncan (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ex-trotskyists 

message: As I stated here and here before (without attaining any response so far): Explicitly International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations (ICOR) does not consider itself an "International". The reason is, ICOR does not want to repeat errors such as bureaucratic deviations from democratic centralism made by defunct Communist International in its practice but learn from them for recent and coming struggles. At the recent state of its development ICOR considers itself an instrument for organizing international mutual support in coordinating workers' and peoples' progressive struggles and party building of “autonomous, independent and self-reliant” revolutionary organizations. It does not claim to follow the organizational principle of democratic centralism (yet), which would be the principal characteristic of an international following marxist-leninist standards. --Partisan1917 06:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICOR is not an international