lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SMS spoofing

message: There are, of course, legitimate reasons for SMS spoofing.  Eg. you want a foxytag account, and don't have a mobile phone.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgombos (talk • contribs) 06:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No, SMS spoofing is not just used maliciously

message: In the fourth section, it says about mobile phone spam. This has nothing to do with SMS Spoofing, maybe move it to a spam related article. --Jenkinsp 17:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SPAM

message: It looks like that the author of this article has given its permission to be used as a source here.--Woohookitty(cat scratches) 09:10, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: Can someone cite an article that explains what countries this is a illegal in?  It's a bold statement to just say that it's a felony.
:In the US, there is an attempt to outlaw sms spoofing in bill S.030.. but it has not passed yet AFAIK.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgombos (talk • contribs) 21:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Felony

message: so why don't phones always some like that?
and what's an authorized number any way? how does it know? >_<  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.173.113.96 (talk) 13:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's not up to the providers to decide who their customers can and cannot communicate with. There would be a public outcry if manufactures of cellphones (or carriers) began blocking "unknown" numbers without the user first opting in.
In response to your second question, an authorized number is generally one that exists in the users contacts. Eliwins (talk) 01:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A user may also modify the phone's settings so that only messages from authorized numbers are allowed 

message: On SMS Spoofing, the last URL links to a page that isn't there.
The Threat of SMS Spoofing:Prevent Revenue Loss by Securing The Network Against Fraudulent Attack
It should either be fixed to point to a valid page, or be removed.
209.87.254.222 (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. If you have another link to put in its place, let us know. Thanks, — Bility (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 209.87.254.222, 28 March 2011 

message: This seems like a huge security hole. Does the network really accept SMS with arbitrary sender id/phone number? As the phone's and SIM's identities are known, this seems unnecessary. Those with a legitimate need to use alternative identities could have these noted in a registry. These issues are not discussed here, nor (what I can see) in the articles about the SMS protocols or Mobile security. --LPfi (talk) 12:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why possible?
Category talk:National coats of arms

message: Lots of the articles in this cat are named 
 Coats of Arms of ...
shouldnt it be
 Coats of arms of ...
Tobias Conradi (Talk) 09:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation

message: This is a set of links to COPYRIGHTED images! Skull 'n' Femurs 01:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyrighted images

message: A lot of these are called "state emblems" or "state seals" etc., and aren't really coats of arms in the traditional Western heraldic sense... AnonMoos 15:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology
Talk:Oil Springs Reservation

message: Is there any US census-related reason to putting this information on *3* different pages? It strikes me that Oil Springs should be all on just one page - there are only 11 people there, none of whom are native anyway...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianski (talk • contribs) 
:Consolidated into one page now. --JBC3 (talk) 19:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte First Nation

message: At some point, someone should talk about the nature of Tyendinaga compared to other Mohawk communities.
It is most decidedly one of the most "progressive" communities in terms of adapting to Western culture...
This is probably just a reminder to me to do it later, unless whomever else is reading this wants to do it :)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianski (talk • contribs) 
:Yes, a word or two about the political history of Tyendinaga vis-à-vis other Mohawk First Nations would also be handy... QuartierLatin1968  22:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree, it's totally biased to call Tyendinaga progressive for its Westernization. I know quite a few Kentekehaka that would totally flip over that statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikewazhere (talk • contribs) 21:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of populated places in Zimbabwe

message: How about moving this page to List of cities and towns in Zimbabwe? or does anyone has comments on making different lists per province?--Jcw69 09:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This list includes cities and towns (urban areas) as well as rural settlements, referred to as "villages". Either the title stays as it is and we move the "villages" or we change the name. However, it should be noted that Village in Zimbabwe is a subdivision of a ward and the settlements on this list which are not towns or cities are growth points or business centres under Zimbabwean law. Babakathy (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move or split
Talk:Diaochan

message: Why are most of the ROTK articles this bad? Calling Cao Cao a tyrants seems POV to me, also there was never any mention of Diao Chan falling in love with Lu Bu, that's just speculation. Not to mention that suicide story, if we're going by the novel she was send to the capital. That's a Japanese story that she commited suicide.
--195.229.242.52 22:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article quality

message: If my memory served me right, I believe that after the devastating defeat of Lu Bu at Xia Pi, Diao Chan submitted herself to Cao Cao, and became his concubine/wife, and later was pregnant with his child. Has it been that true or not?The Professional 19:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Even in folklore, she has more to do with Guan Yu than Cao Cao. _dk 01:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Side Stories/Unofficial History/Unofficial Biography About Diao Chan
Talk:Arthur Hallam

message: 'Hallam and Tennyson planned to publish a book of poems together... Hallam’s father, however, objected...' What was his objection? Valetude (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's objection to Tennyson? 

message: I deleted a reference to Hallam as Tennyson's "lover" as not NPOV. It is sometimes claimed as fact that they were lovers in the contemporary sense, but there is no evidence of a sexual or romantic relationship in the sense of being erotic lovers. Victorian friendships between men in the UK were often openly affectionate, passionate, and even 'romantic,' but that did not mean that they were engaging in sex or that they were secret lovers. The general fear of being labeled as homosexual if two men were very close friends was a later development in UK and American society  which reached its zenith after World War II. IACOBVS (talk) 21:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hallam as Tennyson's "Lover" 

message: Hallam has been described as the jeune homme fatal (French for "fatal young man") of his generation.
:This does not belong in the lede, as it is not referenced in the main article. And cites do not belong in the lede. Valetude (talk) 12:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: also such a literal translation does not do justice to the French.  A "femme fatale" is not a "fatal woman" but a dangerously seductive woman.  Wiktionary says, re "homme fatal", "An ultimately seductive and dangerous man; a womanizer."--47.55.147.58 (talk) 20:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Item in lede not represented in article
Talk:Setun

message: Setun was the first (and only) ternary computer on the World. It was built at 1958. in Kazan (SSSR, USSR on English) by Nikolay Brusentsov, Soviet war hero. Setun used ternary logic (digits were -1, 0, 1). At 1960. there was enough programs for Setun that it can be tested. There were built 50 of them. I hope I helped somebody. Salut komrads!
:Except for Thomas Fowlers machine from the 1840's. FrederikHertzum 09:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Setun was the first

message: I find the Setun extremely interesting, and hope somebody would expand the information available. It would be nice to know the memory organization, word size, instruction set, etc. --Pezezin 00:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There do seem to be a large number of sources that at least mention the computer: .  The first source on that list (Computing in Russia) has four pages of coverage on Setun, which are viewable in the Google Books preview.  Iknowyourider (t c) 15:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow 

message: The result was: Merge DSSP (programming) into Setun. --B. Wolterding 11:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 100%. The interesting stuff about DSSP is that it is like FORTH for the ternary machine Setun, the latter two being very notable in the world of computing. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 08:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree with merger.  Iknowyourider (t c) 15:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposed (DSSP (programming)) 

message: Hi,
The article defines "trits" with the term "ternary bits" which translates to the nonsensical "ternary binary digits". Would it be better to change "ternary bits" to "ternary digits"?
50.132.25.36 (talk) 03:51, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ternary bits == ternary binary digits?
Talk:RIP (disambiguation)

message: This page may need protection if it gets vandalized again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.129.253.90 (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2007‎ (UTC)
I believe that RIP protocol needs to be in top of the list after the acronym rest in peace.
I think is more important that albums names and other things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhcpy (talk • contribs) 19:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Reversion

message: I'd like to combine this page with the Rip page. Any comments on that? --Nneuman (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine with Rip
Talk:Distributed database

message: This article also needs a history section. I know that IBM was among the pioneers of distributed databases. Sam Tomato (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Lists need clear and encyclopedic inclusion criteria (not "some random examples"). Secondly, the lead section should summarize information from the main text, not introduce new information on its own (MOS:LEAD). Also, noteworthy details should be based on independent reliable sources in encyclopedic context, not on self-published websites or other PR platforms. GermanJoe (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example spam removed
Talk:The Wanting Seed

message: : At one time Section 28 would have made it diffficult for this book to be used in British schools! It's sapiens to be homo as agovenrment-sponsored slogan  in a future society would have fallen foul of that piece of legislation! And never mind that Burgess would have been all too aware of the Latin vs. Greek confusion over the word homo 81.102.15.200 (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotion of homosexuality?
Talk:Übersexual

message: Is this a Wikipedia article or undergraduate original research? Should this be listed at AfD? --Wetman 11:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. Please put it on AfD. --Ghirlandajo 15:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text: What's AfD? -- H005 14:16, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion --Ghirlandajo 15:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

text: The ubersexual is a legitimate term, however, I would opt for merging it with the metrosexual article. For more info, please read this article I wrote about the two words. Mcmvanbree 21:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is Charlie McGrath? -- Mikeblas 19:48, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:   Charlie McGrath 

message: Clearly a joke, as the "advertiser" was born in 1860 and ... Vin Deisel, Chuck Norris and Mr. T? Internet fads anyone? LupusCanis 14:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those last were added just today. I think the ad firm has survided its founder's demise. -Will Beback 19:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (I was waiting for the Chuck Norris reference. *sigh*) mxdxcxnx T C 20:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted last paragraph 

message: Is there a source for that or did someone just make it up? Rush Limbaugh seems to be considered an ubersexual and he isn't a lib. 24.130.6.237 04:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubersexuals = liberals?
Category talk:Los Angeles

message: IMHO :Category:Los Angeles, California is confusingly misnamed. It looks like it should be for only the City of Los Angeles, California, but the description says that it is for the Greater Los Angeles area. I think that this category should be renamed to something like :Category:Los Angeles area or :Category:Greater Los Angeles area, and then put under :Category:Metropolitan areas of the United States (see :Category:San Francisco Bay Area for another California example). BlankVerse 11:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguous/misnamed?

message: :The result was: No change. – Fayenatic London 11:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   If you're scratching your head thinking, "this is about as clear of an example of C2D as I can possibly imagine", you're not alone. Oculi's background about this being controversial is quite accurate though. RevelationDirect (talk) 21:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy of old nomination
Talk:Samizdata

message: I can't see any reason for the notability of the subject.  I've removed the uncited (and jokily unnotable) assertion that 
I will be taking this to WP:AFD unless anyone comes out of the woodwork.
JASpencer 20:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The referenced Guardian article gives its daily hits at +15000 and calls it one of the largest of the country, plus "arguably the grandfather of political blogs" there, and Great Britain's none too small. Samizdata is covered thoroughly. That help any? --Kizor 20:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't.  15,000 hits is not a criteria for inclusion in WP:WEB and secondly WP:WEB talks about multiple mentions in independent sources and the Guardian is just one.  That said I'm more relaxed about this than before. JASpencer 23:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally have major reservations about WP:WEB. It's explicitly descriptive, not perscriptive, meaning that its use must be tempered with common sense and the specific circumstances. --Kizor 18:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Smn theorem

message: Could the Title not be writen as
s_{n}^{m}
?
:I don't think so - due to technical restrictions sub- and superscripts are not presently possible. --Kizor 12:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The following sentences from the scetion "Details" strike me as superfluous.
To generalize the theorem, choose a scheme for encoding n numbers as one number, so that the original numbers can be extracted by primitive recursive functions. For example, one might interleave the bits of the numbers.
In fact, the remainder of the section does not use any encoding scheme for numbers, just the usual Gödel numbering of computable functions.
Another remark: the section "Example" isn't an example at all. LISP is not a language of functions from (tuples of) natural numbers to natural numbers, and certainly not a language of primitive recursive functions. While it can operate on values representing LISP source code, this is not an example of Gödel numbering at all. I think the trivial implementation given is more misleading than illustrative, since the actual proof if the theorem (essentially the construction of the requested primitive recursive function) is far more complicated than the example suggests. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 13:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superflous sentences? 

message: Quote from the article:
Given a Gödel numbering \varphi of recursive functions, there is a primitive recursive function s of two arguments with the following property: for every Gödel number p of a partial computable function f with two arguments, the expressions \varphi_{s(p,x)}(y) and f(x,y) are defined for the same combinations of natural numbers x and y, and their values are equal for any such combination.
I would rephrase it as follows
Given a Gödel numbering \varphi of partial recursive functions, there is a primitive recursive function s of two arguments with the following property: for every Gödel number p of a partial computable (recursive ??) function with two arguments, the expressions \varphi_{s(p,x)}(y) and \varphi_p(x,y) are defined for the same combinations of natural numbers x and y, and their values are equal for any such combination.
(The statement of the more general form of the theorem seems clear to me as it is in the article.)  My rationale for this proposed change is that, given the Gödel number of the function f, we can simply express it in terms of its Gödel number without cluttering the reader's mind with an extra variable name.  Also the article should standardize terminology, viz. "partial recursive function" vs. "partial computable function".  However, I do not want to make these change on my own since I am not an expert in this area. 71.222.14.246 (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement of basic form of theorem is confusing 

message: Why is this named the "Smn theorem", rather than the "Snm theorem"? Typically the subscript is read before the superscript.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.204.46.103 (talk) 15:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smn or Snm?
Talk:Shurikenjutsu

message: I've removed the reference to "ninja stars" in the first line. The ninja stars (sic) most people are familiar with are poor copies of a senban shuriken (which is already listed) and not actually used in any shurikenjutsu I'm aware of (not even the ninjutsu arts). I understand the pop-culture reference, but I think it's out of place for this article. --Rustedshuriken 03:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ninja star" 

message: I've done some minor work on this page. Can someone else more knowledgable in the field add to it please? --Stretch 12:08, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why the switch in terminology from 'senban' to 'hira' shuriken? --Rustedshuriken 07:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Fair enough. --Rustedshuriken 07:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The very first line of the article defines shuriken jutsu as the art of throwing various kinds of darts, discs, and knives. Next to each the japanese term is given (bo shuriken, hira shuriken, and tanto). My edit (and the question which accompanied it) was a revert of a change made by 209.169.111.193 which removed the clairification of knives to mean tanto. My knowledge of shuriken jutsu agrees with what you have said, and so I believe tanto is the right word to use here. But the edit by 209.169.111.193 didn't have the feel of vandalism, so I was hoping s/he would explain why they made the change here. --Rustedshuriken 23:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc 

message: Like just about every page associated with "ninja", I wonder how historically accurate this is.  I see many books cited, but let's be careful not to use Ashida Kim type stuff.  I'm particularly suspicious of this passage:
:During feudal times, warriors, or bugeisha learned martial arts and sought to gain employment based on their skill, whether it be the more socially accepted path of the Samurai, or in the realms of espionage and covert warfare.
I wasn't aware that you could just decide to become a samurai.  Or that there was a dedicated profession of assassins and spies working freelance.  As far as I know, the entire notion of "ninja" as some parallel caste and culture to those of the samurai is the stuff of fiction.  --GenkiNeko 20:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked the shuriken page, and found the information I described there. Would it be alright for someone to put the information here as well? Groundlord (talk) 21:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Accuracy? 

message: I oppose the merger. The article is about the art of wielding shuriken, not about the shuriken. Such as Kenjutsu is about the art of wielding swords. Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose as above.  If  the study of their use is notable, articles about tools or weapons and their use should absolutely be seperate.  Both of these articles are past stub class, so I see no reason to merge.  Normad Zeta 08:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:Maceo Parker

message: I removed this category because over the time Maceo Parker has become an independent musician of its own. Of course without James' success Maceo's would not have been possible
--mac_c 12:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove James Brown category 

message: It is no longer possible to comment on ratings due to a backlog. Please put any comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 16:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Bio Rating

message: Does anybody have any mention of Maceo & the Mack? I only ask because it was on the Snatch (or was it Lock/Stock) soundtrack, and it was a great song (Cross The Tracks). Secretagentwang (talk) 05:22, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Macks

message: I removed Selmer, that was written before Brilhart, since Brilhart is an American brand that has nothing to do with Selmer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.92.17.31 (talk) 02:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Selmer took over Brilhart. ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 02:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Selmer Brilhart

message: Support split -Discography is long and should be split to Maceo Parker discography.  Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maceo Parker discography 