lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deer stalking

message: Oppose Game stalking has no real meaning other than a generic term for hunting game with rifle, bow or shotgun by approaching it quietly on the ground. There is thus no case for amalgamating deer stalking with this topic as this is a distinct and recognised activity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sewinbasher (talk • contribs) 14:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose: Game stalking specifically refers to a mode of hunting involving stealth. Primary edit need IMHO for this article is expanding definition beyond UK. Kortoso  (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote

message: "Deer stalking is not the only form of control, or culling, for the six wild species of deer at large in the UK."
Should this read "is now" rather than "is not"? Either could be correct, but the current wording is strange since no other methods are mentioned in the paragraph. Azkm (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in History section?

message: Deleted per WP:TPO (Wikipedia is not a forum.) --Kudpung (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Value judgements

message: 'Conseil International du Chasse'  -in last sentence of intro - section 
dodgy spelling of French - should be :
'Conseil International DE LA Chasse'
188.65.183.52 (talk) 22:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit needed 

message: Deerstalking formerly meant to stalk/hunt 'deer' as in any animal - which is the older meaning of 'deer' in English, cf. German 'tier'. Anyway, this is why there is confusion here over the difference betwixt 'deer stalking' and 'deer hunting'.And also why the so-called 'history' section of the article somehow lacks any indication of when deerstalking started.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.66.66.78 (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please come up with some cites. We'd all love to see them. Kortoso  (talk) 21:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deerstalking formerly meant to stalk any animal 

message: This article suffers from some heavily nuanced phrasing, making it transparent where its author'(s) feelings lie, a good sign of a non-neutral article. Some of the problematic expressions include:
* "to bring much needed income"
* "Deerstalkers have the humane despatch of the deer at the forefront of their mind"
* "right behind safe shooting practice"
* "bring in much needed funds"
* "which in itself is rewarding as lots can be learnt"
—BillC talk 09:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic phrasing
Talk:Hume (soil)

message: Have not found any reasonable information source for this article.
And it is too short. If any info is available I think it would be better to present them in lists on "Soil types" wiki-page?
Maybe it is better to remove current webpage?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.84.36.132 (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion necessity
Talk:Snocross

message: Royalbroil mentioned he/she was looking for information on snocross outside North America. According to this German-language website promoting a race in Austria, the sport is as popular as skiing in Scandinavia. It also mentions pros from Slovenia and Italy. However, I'm not sure how accurate the first of those claims is, since this might just be an exaggeration to help promote the sport. According to this article (I can't read all of it, since that would require registration) Yamaha recently formed two Japanese snocross teams.--Carabinieri (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Snocross in Europe and Asia
Template talk:Austrian Hockey League

message: Shouldn't the flag of Slovenia and the flag of Hungary be added to the template? Alternatively, the Austrian flag taken out (we have no flag at the multinational :Template:NHL for instance)? Of course, the league is still heavily based in Austria (I can't even find a Slovenian, Hungarian or English version of the official site), but isn't it more important what countries are represented by teams? -- Jao (talk) 07:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Navboxes regarding the templates. Flibirigit (talk) 16:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the pointer, I'm glad this is being discussed, although opinions seem to differ very much here. I'll gladly leave it to the WikiProject participants to figure it out though. -- Jao (talk) 17:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to leave comments there too. Flibirigit (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags in caption
Talk:Bernicia/Archive 1

message: This still needs some work, particularly the Saxon part, but I have revamped the existing information so that it is presented in a better order and is not misleading in any way:
a) The previous 'Bryneich' information needed clarifying. I have removed the kinglist because it is pure supposition that that line relates to Bryneich.
b) I have removed a paragraph relating to post-634 expansion to the Northumbria page. The 'Forcibly United Northumbria' section should probably also be transferred to Northumbria. Does anyone have any strong opinions on this?
c) I have removed all Saxon name forms, such as Æðelfriþ, as these are meaningless to anyone unfamiliar with the subject. Walgamanus 21:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work 

message: End all the racist claims against Brythons, Wales and the Welsh/Cumbric language!
--86.29.249.216 13:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking something similar. The parts with 'known in Welsh as..', is it Welsh? or the language of what is now England? Gazh 14:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brythonic spellings

message: See the E.B.K. web-site's spellings!
--86.29.249.107 01:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: National nomicultural spellings.

message: It appears once in this article and is a bit POV for my liking, removed it now, hope it doesn't offend. Gazh 10:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brythons/Britons being refered to as 'Welsh'
Talk:Toki Yorinari

message: These narrative sentences have no cited source.
:"... and final ruling head of the Toki clan during the latter years of the Sengoku period of feudal Japan. As daimyo of Mino Province, he had hired Saito Dosan as his retainer in the 1520s, but was overthrown and expelled from the province by Dosan in a coup d'état in 1542. After this, Toki Yorinari allied with Oda Nobuhide of neighboring Owari Province (the father of the great daimyo Oda Nobunaga) and the two fought Dosan at the Battle of Kanoguchi but lost this battle." 
If a reliable source can be identified, this can be restored to the article. --Ansei (talk) 19:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced material
Talk:Ascension night heron

message: This is mangled, the original does not compare the bill with a cormoran specifically but adds "ou autre corbeau" - cormorants were believed to be a sea-going raven at that tim. Cf. "corvus marinus, "sea raven" etc, the latter known and used for cormorants as late as the 18th century. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thevet qoute
Talk:Spanish era

message: I added one source, from Medieval Iberia An Encyclopeida. The author of that source is a noted historian on the topic and based his work on two Spanish language sources. However not everything included in the wiki article was in the encyclopedia, so this article still requires more work. (SSJPabs (talk) 21:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Explain 112.198.67.134 (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish period
Talk:Arara, Paraíba

message: The poruguese version of thistext is taken from http://saber.sapo.pt/wiki/Arara_%28Para%C3%ADba%29 under GNU licence.  Andreas  (T) 15:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've been informed that the article was not copied http://www.sudema.pb.gov.br/arq/geoprocessamento/MAPAS/municipios_estado_ibge/arara.htm for as much of its history as I thought. This needs further investigation. —Random832 15:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleted copyvio 

message: Sorry, folks. The person who reported this as a copyvio of  made a mistake. That website clearly notes that its content is taken under GNU public license, which means that it originated with Wikipedia. There are lots of these "mirror" sites around the world. Wikipedia can't be in violation of copying its own content.
I left a message on the talk page of the admin who deleted all this edit history, which I think should be restored immediately.
I was planning to quell any doubts by fixing up the machine translation, when I found that the entire content was gone from the system. Cbdorsett 15:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a copyvio 
Talk:Michael Spence (Holby City)

message: * Frickative 15:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Ron Shandler

message: This article needs a lot more information. Just a few things to start with. (1) Shandler's date and place of birth, current place of residence, and relevant information about his education/career. (2) More on the founding of BaseballHQ -- when, where? What is its purpose, coverage, etc. What kind of business is it (private corp, public)? (3) Bibliography -- including list of Baseball Forecaster volumes (including ISBN's); other writings, if any. (4) Any other relevant facts that speak to Shandler's notability and achievements.--Mack2 (talk) 05:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for improvement
Talk:Church of the East in India

message: I am starting the clean Up.Tarijanel 15:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The article seems to be an exact copy-paste from an url. Hence the article needs extensive cleanup and should be re-written. --Samaleks (talk) 20:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup required

message: Wouldn't be better to rename this to Church of the East in Malabar, similar to Church of the East in China? Most scholars agree that the Church of the East wasn't quite Nestorian and that this title was used as a pejorative term by Jacobites and Catholics.--Rafy talk 01:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I Agree on that topic Br Ibrahim john (talk) 13:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename 

message: I agree to some extent with Rafy. However I would like to suggest that the best title for this article would be: The Nestorian Controversy and the Church in India. Such a title would allow this article to be expanded to include the various jurisdictions present in India and permit an historical overview to be included. 27.33.44.231 (talk) 14:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Julien Edmund Victor Gaujot

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Cronobacter sakazakii

message: Shouldn't this be Cronobacter sakazakii and not Enterobacter sakazakii? --Nessie (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Genus?

message: E.s. was reclassified as 6 species of Cronobacter, incl. C.s., please see Taxonomy section for more.
In 2011 two new species were added to the Cronobacter genus; C. universalis and C. condimenti. 
Someone between Dec  2011 and Jan 2012 incorrectly modified this page to say 'C. sakazakii=E sakazakii' which is a common mis-understanding about the organism, it is incorrect and contradicts the rest of the entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.71.75.208 (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New genus
Talk:Hot Sun Foundation

message: see the reference in the article http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6935607.stm from the bbc. hot sun foundation referenced there, mistakenly as hot sun films trust. the BBC online is a reliable source.
::asserts some notability, so it passes speedy. No opinion on whether actually notable  At the minimum you will need a source with the correct name.  DGG (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:East St. Louis massacre

message: This needs more substantiation in terms of historical rather than journalistic accounts. We know it happened, and it deserves to have more facts in the account, especially in the background.  It was a labor as well as racially motivated riot.--Parkwells 15:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: This is an interesting and important article.  It is important for obvious reasons, but particularly interesting given the fact that St. Louis did not witness any rioting when later race riots flourished into and throughout the Civil Rights Era.  Do the key authors cited ever mention this fact?  Is this pertinent information for the page?  --Kenneth M Burke (talk) 16:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant Information?

message: Coordinates are based on . GeorgeofOrange (talk) 02:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates  

message: Why is this massacre called a riot? Like the LA riots and Watts Riots and MKL Riots when blacks, tired of injustice, looted and burned and had the National Guard called in to stop the violence? That is not what happened here. This was a race-based massacre by a white mob of white supremacists of innocent blacks which is the very definition of a pogrom. I understand that term has been reserved mostly for Jews. But the world is updating its language now (slaves are now enslaved people, etc). It is high time Wikipedia updates its language and stops using "riot" which is what the pogrom was called by an unsympathetic press in 1917. Many of these pogroms against blacks need to be updated from riot to pogrom. But let's start here. Let's lead on this. User:Chris Orlet.
Agreed! I'm following up on User:Chris Orlet's suggestion by adding the article to Wikipedia:Requested_moves. Andersem (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article
Talk:Sangguniang Panlalawigan

message: There is a related discussion over at Talk:Sangguniang Panlungsod#Requested move.  There no consensus was reached and so the use of Sangguniang Panlungsod and similar titles were kept. I think that we should have a consistent policy across all four bodies. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 11:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Related discussion

message: A move request is currently ongoing at Talk:Sangguniang Panlungsod. –HTD 15:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:RM 

message: * (cur | prev) 15:53, 13 May 2013‎ Green Giant (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (42,140 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Green Giant moved page Talk:Sangguniang Panlalawigan to Talk:Provincial councils in the Philippines: Names should be in English where possible) (undo | thank)
:With all the Talk on this page this was not an uncontroversial move. Should be reverted by a WP:RM technical request. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , are you willing to support a similar measure now? –HTD 15:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: either way a RM discussion would be helpful In ictu oculi (talk) 10:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:BRD needed

message: I propose reverting to the original name of Sangguniang Panlalawigan until a consensus can be reached about this article.  Taken together, the following points convince me that we should revert (by moving, not by using "undo") to the status quo ante, if you will, before May 13 2013:  (1) there should be consistency across the articles on non-national Philippine legislatures, (2) there was no consensus reached at Talk:Sangguniang Panlungsod#Requested move, (3) there is no consensus on this Talk page above about this article's name, (4) Sangguniang Panlalawigan was the original name, and (5) that name lasted until May 2013.  If there is no objection or if a consensus is reached, I will attempt to move and if I am not allowed, then I will request an administrator to move it. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 07:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you should open a separate WP:RM for this one... –HTD 10:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert to old name 

message: I reverted User:MidasHotel20's move of this page.  MidasHotel20's move was in keeping with WP:Bold and WP:Bold, Revert, Discuss. I applaud MidasHotel20 for his interest and bold act.  I have now reverted -- step two -- because it is a controversial move, that has been much discussed above.  We need to reach a new consensus before we move the page yet again.  This is one of the few places in Wikipedia where being bold will lead to revert and then discussion.  Now, is it time for stage three, for discussion?  Is it time to reopen the discussion? When is it appropriate to reopen such a discussion?  --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted more to Provincial Council 

message: Anong answer ito 49.145.233.168 (talk) 13:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sangguniang panlalawigan
Category talk:Fantasy novels by nationality

message: This category, like many others, needs a substantial preface. This one has only a hatlink to the parallel(?) class of science fiction novels, and that category has no preface at all.
The next section concerns the most important matter vital to an adequate substantial preface. --P64 (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Preface

message: Do we elsewhere discuss the classification by nationality of fantasy, fantasy novels, fantasy writers? 
F Writers need no special consideration; they are classified as other people, and as they are described in the leads of their biographies.
Wikipedia has :Category: British child writers as well as :Category: British children's writers. I take for granted that we don't need to group characters in (British) fantasy who are writers.
F Novels may be classified by nationality and/or locale of their  publication (first editions)? Is that appropriate? If so, we need only a way to handle co- or simultaneous publication. Alt, is a novel British by relation to the history of British literature? or culture more generally?
Fantasy may be classified nationally by relation to national culture. In practice, I believe, that will almost always be relation to national literature. Alt, national fantasy may be simply a category of categories, comprising national fantasy writers, national fantasy novels, national fantasy movies, and so on.
Does the geographical setting of low fantasy (set in our world) --or its novels and so on-- bear on its nationality? That may be another alternative (Alt) basis for classification but it doesn't pertain to high fantasy. --P64 (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: National (fantasy) novels
Talk:Calshot Castle

message: The current note says cost could be anywhere between "£17,000 and £4.5 million in 2014".
That's plain stupid because it is creating a range from completely different values. This is not a range of mean values.
Here is the table: ranges
In 2014, the relative worth of £107 0s 0d from 1642 is:
*£16,600.00 	using the retail price index
*£16,900.00 	using the GDP deflator
*£235,000.00 	using the average earnings
*£660,000.00 	using the per capita GDP
*£4,520,000.00 	using the share of GDP 
That means the lowest value is 0.38% of the largest value! It's meaningless and shows the editor that put it in doesn't have a clue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.44.175 (talk) 18:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you haven't already, it's worth reading the whole footnote, which does explain this. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soap Operas/Collaboration

message: It's not working and neither was WP:SOAPS. Somethings not right. CelticGreen (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very strange, because it still worked on Talk:Emily Stewart but not on Talk:Kayla Brady. Anyway, I replaced the problem template with a better-named one that avoids the transclusion. — TAnthonyTalk 06:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Aha, as I suspected, it turns out that template functionality seems to have changed across the board in that colons are now active, as in regular links. Many similar templates are now having to be changed as well. — TAnthonyTalk 07:05, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration template
Talk:Robert's Lounge

message: Isn't "Goodfellas" based on these stories at Robert's Lounge? I know this sounds like a dumb question, but I remember every part of that movie(It's one of my all-time favorites). This looks like "Goodfellas" on paper. Mr. Brain (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodfellas, anyone?  

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from Wiseguy by Nicholas Pileggi (1985). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I had started to fix the grammar in this article, and I realized it needed a more extensive cleanup.  So I rewrote most of the article...I moved all of the murders into one section, removed a lot of irrelevant info, and cleaned up some awkwardly-written copy.  This article needs inline citations...I'll work on adding those at some point.  Also, I'll add a picture at some point...I have no idea what the building looks like now, but I'm in the area with some regularity so I'll stop by and check it out within the next couple of months if nobody beats me to it. MirrorLockup (talk) 02:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Nottamun Town

message: This song was collected by the noted collector Cecil Sharp in 1917 at the Hindman Settlement School in Pine Mountain, Kentucky, from singers Una and Sabrina Ritchie, older sister and paternal cousin of Jean Ritchie, best-known member of the Singing Family of the Cumberlands, and its most famous interpreter. It appeared in Sharp's book English Folk Songs of the Southern Appalachians (1932). A version, "Nottingham Town" from (I believe) Missouri is also known to folklorists. Though "Nottamun Town" likely originated as a mummers' song in England, it was apparently forgotten in its country of origin, where no traces of it remain. See Lyle Lofgren, "Remembering The Old Songs: 'Nottamun Town'", (originally published in Inside Bluegrass, September 2003.) Mballen (talk) 17:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cecil Sharp and the Ritchie family 

message: Further to the above I believe that Jean Ritchie made an honest mistake in suggesting that the song was 'uniquely' preserved in her family. 
Sharp may have collected the song from Una Ritchie in 1917 at the Hindman Settlement School, but two versions (a printed one, and one from Hillard Smith) had in fact already been collected in the area in 1910 by Josiah Combs. Combs was, it turns out, a teacher at Hindman Settlement School where the staff engaged in projects encouraging people to learn about and perpetuate their local culture. The fact that Una's version incorporates a textual 'mistake' seen in  the version Hillard Smith gave to Combs is strongly suggestive of the fact that Combs transmitted the song to the Ritchie family. Svejk74 (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Ritchie family version