lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rags Morales

message: Someone has liberally sprinkled references to how Shadowman is one of the things Rags Morales is well known for working on at Valiant. They also made mention of how Anthony Bedard was a well-known Shadowman writer; they worked on ONE fill-in issue when Bob Hall had conflicting deadlines. How that makes them well-known for it is anyone's guess. Turok Dinosaur Hunter, for which he is well known in comic-collectors' circles, was completely left out. I've taken the liberty of removing the Shadowman remarks and adding some mention of Turok.64.222.94.132 (talk) 14:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Known For Shadowman
Talk:Charles Rudolph Walgreen Jr.

message: Please explain how C.R. Walgreen, Jr., could relinquish his role within the company in 1969, and yet remain chairman until 1971. Bigturtle 01:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 years lost in space
Talk:Huber Heights, Ohio

message: I don't really have the time right now, but this article could use some attention.  There is nothing on developer Charles Huber, for which the town is named.  Ursasapien (talk) 12:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slutsk uprising

message: Is UK or US spelling the norm for Wikipedia?  If the latter, it should be "Slutsk defense action."  At the very, a redirect should be in order. -- kosboot (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK vs. US spelling 

message: Polish wiki version of this article discusses him, suggesting he played a prominent role in this conflict as one of the main Belarusian commanders. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why doesn't this article mention the actions of [[Stanisław Bułak-Bałachowicz]]? 
Talk:Alexander Kasimovich Kazembek

message: Is there anyway to edit the title?  It's a very good article but no other biographical entry in Wikipedia states the profession of the person beside their name. Esbullin 15:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well actually Esbullin, if there is a need to distinguish between two people with the same given and surnanmes, their professions tend to be the way that is done in Wikipedia article titles. See for instance John Smith (mathematician), John Smith (dentist), John Smith (brewer), etc. Based on the existence of a disambiguation page for this name, I'd say that's the intent here. However, you could move the page to the alternate form of the name used in the article's first sentence. Hope that helps. -Fsotrain09 23:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It doesn't seem like the page has ever been mentioned in DYK. Here are entries from October 16, 2007:  and . Parishan 08:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK
Talk:Battle of Stone Houses

message: I think that a 'battle' in which 12 people get killed sounds ridiculous. It's better to refer to this as a skirmish. I would define battles as short-term conflicts in which at least over 100 human lives are lost.
It's been referred to as the Battle of Stone Houses since the 1800s. It's not up to us to change the names of events to suit our personal definitions.  To quote from the wikipedia entry Battle - "Battles may be small scale, only involving a handful of individuals, perhaps two squads, up to battles on army levels where hundreds of thousands may be engaged in a single battle at one time."Madness 10:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Main topic classifications

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Cat:MTC. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 17#Cat:MTC until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:48, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cat:MTC" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ryo Chonan

message: as seen  his win over Sakurai was by TKO (ref or doctor stoppage because of of a cut to Sakurai's face. --ProdigySportsman 04:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care what Sherdog.com says, I saw the fight.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ProdigySportsman (talk • contribs) 04:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sakurai not decision but TKO 

message: I've clarified his birthdate and added his birthplace. The info is from Ryo's personal website, which I didn't cite as it's Japanese-language only. BenTrotsky (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical info 

message: Technically, the move that he used to defeat Anderson Silva was a "heel hook" submission.  It says "Flying Scissor Heel Hook," but the "flying scissor" part was simply the method of which he used to take Anderson Silva down to the ground, not the actual move that submitted Anderson Silva.  I personally like the idea of that long title being the one "move" that defeated Silva, but if this is left in, every other article should be rewritten to include the immediate type of take-down or attack that preceded anyone else's loss.  Nitpicking, possibly, but still.  Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.87.142.131 (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method of Loss to Ryo Chonan.
Talk:List of Majins in Dragon Ball

message: It says for Babidi that his reasons for wanting to release Buu are unknown. Judging from a line he says after Piccolo slices him up (manga and Japanese anime), he wants to use Buu to rule the universe.
Starone 06:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Babidi's reason for releasing Buu
Talk:Biblical archaeology/Archive of Talk:Christian archaeology

message: Many of these are poor examples because of proven forgeries.  There are many legitimate sites with possible biblical links that can be used.  Also, I would suggest that the title be changed to "Biblical Archaeology" which is the common name and correct spelling (archeology is used only by the government printing office).  The name Christian Archeology is misleading and far too general.  I don't know how to change the title of the article myself. Sheora 05:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Proposing fusion with Biblical archaeology. Greetings from ptwiki. --84.132.213.102 08:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The article begins with the statement that this is more commonly known as Biblical archeology. if that is how it is more commonly known, the article should be moved. If that statement is incorrect, it should be removed. Seeking views on this issue. KillerChihuahua?!? 12:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That opening statement is correct, as is your assessment. Since there's already an article at Biblical archaeology, I've proposed the merger of the two, under that name. Merenta (talk) 17:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the approved protocol for discussion of such a move is that it is to take place on the Talk page of the article that is to be merged into, Biblical archaeology in this case, please discuss this proposal at Talk:Biblical archaeology. Thanks. Merenta (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Every item in this article is also covered in Biblical archaeology and references therein, and that page has a much more NPOV wording. For that reason I'm redirecting this article to that page without adding anything but a few references. Merenta (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to more common name?
Talk:Wilfredo Santa-Gómez

message: I've been trying in vain to verify that the "unconscious guardian" book actually got published.
The closest I've gotten so far is this link: , which claims to link to an e-book published at fortunecity.com. But fortunecity.com doesn't have that page.
The ISDN number listed in "References" for La Grand Ventara doesn't resolve either. Help? --Alvestrand 06:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification of book publishing? 

message: Wilfredo Santa Gomez and Wilfredo Santa-Gómez are two different articles for same person, need to be merged. Redirect should be made for Wilfredo G. Santa to go to that page. Article should have more reliable sources.--Lawrlafo (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and merged the two articles.--Lawrlafo (talk) 18:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Two articles on Wikipedia for same person

message: I am moving these here for verification or deletion:
*Strathsmore's WHO'S WHO book 2004-2005-11th edition for outstanding international professionals. 
*The Puerto Rico Hall of Fame Home Page (Web page). 
*Directory of Famous Puerto Ricans (Web Page). 
*Puertoriqueños para la historia (Web page). 
*La Gran Ventana, biographical summary - 
*Caguas City Public Library and Digital Library, Caguas city born writers proyect, Caguas Puerto Rico.
*Baywood Publishing Company, Inc. (http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?id=09hu75x4m48gm25g.)
*Kihlstrom, J.F., Tataryn, D.J., & Hoyt, I.P. (1993). Dissociative disorders. In P.J. Sutker & H.E. Adams (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychopathology, 2nd Ed (pp. 203-234). New York: Plenum.University of Arizona Irene P. HoytUniversity of Wisconsin, originally written in 1990, was published in 1993( Dr. Wilfredo G. Santa published  work citation, introduction, first paragraph)
--Lawrlafo (talk) 18:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References that have to be verified or cleaned up
Talk:Battle for Henderson Field

message: While I don't question the threat from the AAF, weren't the Japanese slow to feed in troops because they disbelieved the Americans were actually on the island in the (actual) strength they were? And didn't that drive the unwillingness to (or absence of) use of carriers to escort APs/AKs?  Trekphiler 16:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That could be the reason that they didn't use their carriers to try to protect transport convoys going to Guadalcanal, but I haven't found anything that says that for sure..  But, the main reason that the Japanese didn't use transport ships to deliver their troops and materiel to Guadalcanal was because of what happened to Tanaka's convoy during the Battle of the Eastern Solomons.  His convoy of several slow transport ships took heavy damage and was diverted to the Shortland Island.  From there on out, the Eighth Fleet decided to warships as much as possible at night to deliver the troops and supplies to the island.  Reinforcing this decision, on August 28 a destroyer convoy that tried to make a delivery during daylight hours took heavy damage from a strike by Henderson aircraft. Cla68 20:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a circular argument. The convoy was slaughtered because it wasn't escorted adequetly because IJA didn't believe Vandegrift had large numbers & so couldn't do serious harm; when this proved mistaken, they switched to DDs. (If it was up to me, I'd add something about IJA-IJN rivalry & lack of IJA shipping driving it, if I could source it for sure.)  Trekphiler 08:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just personally haven't read anything that states that for sure.  If I come across it, I'll add it to the article. Cla68 10:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you got Hayashi & Coox's Kogun, or Willmott's Empires in the Balance & Barrier & the Javelin? (I'll look into Warriors of the Rising Sun; the local library doesn't have the others...) It's in one of them...  Trekphiler 23:01 & 23:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have an electronic copy of Kogun so I'll check that. Cla68 04:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Warriors, p.285, says it, but I think there's a less POV cite, too.  Trekphiler 23:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay.  Kogun doesn't say it. Cla68 01:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strength in numbers

message: How come the infobox is all messed up specifically in the names of commanders as it shows an American commander as commanding the Japanese forces. 
--177.230.47.65 (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, it was a mark up error -- I think I've fixed this now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox error 

message: We take a whole paragraph in the lede to explain the reasons for a commander's absence. While this is appropriate for the main body of the article, it's too long for the lede. Any objection if I shorten it? DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Command
Talk:Fabio Grossi (dancer)

message: No claims of notability, no third party sources.  Also the redirect in the talk page was just cheap.  Probably should AfD this except I'm tired ... Tomstdenis 05:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Template talk:Romanian Roma topics

message: Should we add Lăutari here? Taraful Haiducilor under people? - Jmabel | Talk 06:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've included both of those. I think the template may need some reorganisation as it becomes more culturally-focussed. As a minority rights worker, I tend to be more biased towards the legal, political and social aspects of the Roma (and any other minorities) rather than the cultural aspects; if you want to add culturally-related articles about the Roma in the template, you're welcome to do so, since I'm less well informed in this domain.  Ronline ✉ 13:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd think so. - Jmabel | Talk 07:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lăutari
Talk:Church of Misery

message: Notability has been established as follows:
Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).
--Eastlaw 06:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Rural Municipality of Maple Bush No. 224

message: The Elbow link in the first sentences links to a disambiguation page. Please link it to an appropriate page, because I don't know if this is referring to a city, lake, river, etc. Nehrams2020 06:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elbow link 

message: I understand that in Manitoba and Saskatchewan Canada RM is an abbreviation for Rural Municipality. Why then link to a disambiguation page that doesn't contain a reference to it? Shropman 19:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM link
Talk:Aeroelasticity

message: Are these examples in aircraft? http://youtube.com/watch?v=zh2_vGYWO8s and http://youtube.com/watch?v=ORjbMRNyGnE
No, it's not aerodynamic forces causing those vibrations, it's probably imbalance in the rotor. But they're good examples of resonance because unless you're near the resonant frequency an imbalance vibration probably won't grow like that... --Sukisuki (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: There has been at least one promising attempt to generate electrical wind power utilizing the aeroelastic properties of a taut membrane (belt).  - Soulkeeper 14:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taking aeroelasticity to use 

message: Does this "Activ Aeroelastic Wing" have anything to do with aeroelasticity as covered by this article?  As far as I can make out it is a self-flexing wing. AlekH (talk) 22:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media??

message: cheap toy in Japan with about 12 cm in diameter, the hole about 8 mm, to be bridged and smashed like a volleyball AND stays pretty filled with air. --Helium4 (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  paper balls with opening 

message: When you hover over flutter in a linked page, it displays "Dynamic aeroelasticity studies the interactions among aerodynamic..."  instead of "Flutter is a dynamic instability of an elastic structure..."  I normally just correct spelling and grammar, and after going through help pages my head is spinning, the task is far beyond me to fix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr71fan (talk • contribs) 00:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flutter pop up text in other articles points to the subject header Dynamic Aeroelasticity
Talk:Same-sex parenting

message: — Assignment last updated by Karliekargela (talk) 14:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LGBTQ Reproductive Health

message: — Assignment last updated by Uosduffy (talk) 06:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and the Law

message: I think this article needs cleaning up as there are too many inline citations in the lead paragraph and a bit in the second section. What do you think? 2A00:23C5:F405:2001:B814:5B78:8694:748F (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. WP:OVERCITE has the guidance on this. In particular, MOS:LEAD suggests that the lead section should be a summary of key points and references. The article is not protected from editing by IP editors, so if you can improve it by restricting the early citations to the most important (e.g. perhaps, those academic sources that have been most cited externally to Wikipedia), please do so. Overall, I don't see any need to remove any cited source entirely as many are used several times later in the body text. (Technical note: make sure you are familiar with how named references are used and preview your edits before saving them to check all is OK). Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

text: It should cite reviews rather than individual studies, although recent large representative samples from the Netherlands are far more powerful than older convenience sample studies. Zenomonoz (talk) 11:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is suffering from Citation overkill 

message: Hi . Thanks for your work on this article. You recently moved this talk page to Talk:LGBTQ+ parenting. The biggest issue is that you did not move the associated article. We should never have the article at one title and the talk page at a different one. There's also the issue that we'd prefer for this article, which is a "child" article of LGBT, to stay consistent with the "parent". If you'd still like to move it, you should consider starting a requested move discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that! I thought I had moved the other one, this makes sense. McCarty2597 (talk) 18:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed move
Template talk:Hypothetical Indo-European subfamilies

message: Indo-Hittite isn't so much a "hypothetical subfamily" as a hypothetical superfamily, and should maybe be listed separately. dab (ᛏ) 07:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This goes double for Indo-Uralic, and including it while leaving out other external relationship proposals seems slightly POV really. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 15:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypothetical superfamilies 

message: Although Balto-Slavic is, strictly speaking, a hypothetical IE subfamily, including it here with subgroupings that do not enjoy widespread support is misleading. Except for a few nationalists who don't understand or care about linguistics, Balto-Slavic is about as widely accepted among Indo-Europeanists as Indo-Iranian, which I notice is not on this list. Therefore, I'm removing it from the template (just as the template has already been removed from the article Balto-Slavic languages). Alternatively, Indo-Iranian could be added to the template. —Angr 14:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balto-Slavic 

message: Why not use Navbox template?


Indo-European
id:Templat:Subrumpun hipotetis bahasa Indo-Eropa

Greets from Munich, Bavarjan (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As noone says anything and everything is reverable in Wikipedia, I'll just do it... Bavarjan (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use Navbox
Talk:Sponson

message: I think, "capsize" here was wrongly used as a noun. Sounds awkward.
Armament mounted below the waterline might be less than useful. The sponsons I'm familiar with (on aircraft carriers) were well above the waterline...
:In this context, I think they mean a flotation device or stabilizer, not a gun mount. 96.54.53.165 (talk) 20:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Take the time to look around Wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outrigger  From the article they don't look remotely the same. 71.12.248.94 (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be clear in the article. I have fixed that. ScooterSponson (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I see a damned boat and an airplane.  Since I don't' know what a "sponson" is, these two photos offer not one god damned clue.  If we have to use these generic images, we should eithier zoom in on the "sponson" or circle it in red.
These images are like posting a planet of Earth and saying "this is dirt".....technically could be correct but nowhere explanatory.
If you guys spent as much time creating quality articles as you do begging for money via popups, WP would be awesome.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.210.228.230 (talk) 05:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally WORTHLESS images 

message: Are there more images we could add? I still didn't understand what a sponson was even after I read the page, due to a lack of images. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 11:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More images
Talk:Spherical pendulum

message: The text has the location as (r, theta, phi), but there's no 'r' in the illustration, it's 'l'. Am I missing something? Does anyone know if there's a standard nomenclature for this? Should the label be changed or the text?
A2800276 (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The r is part of the spherical coordinate system, l is the constant length of the pendulum. For solving the problem just take r = l. M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 15:48, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration inconsistant with text? 

message: Is this the same as conical pendulum? 24.241.226.16 07:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aka conical pendulum? 

message: I was the Last guy to fix the E-L equation, but I think we need to put a diffrent version of it because of all the fixes it has been through. If a lot of people argue about the same sign, maybe we should just change the equation so that it won't confuse people anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.159.230.164 (talk) 16:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: the sign here is wrong, if theta is taken as the one in the (r,theta,phi), there should be a minus in the lagrangian. by what is written, the potential energy is -mgr*cos(theta). then, if theta equals 0, since the axis is taken from the fixed point of the string, the energy at the highest point, which is in the upper half of z axis, is -mgr, and there shouldn't be a minus there. if theta is taken from -z and not z, then the equation is ok.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.72.225.222 (talk) 00:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euler-Lagrange Equation
Talk:Honda XL250

message: dit is een lekker hondaatje
The caption on this picture is incorrect, there was no xl250 in 1992 that I know of. Serpentes 03:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I have no idea what the later-year model XL 250s produced in the way of horsepower, but the 1972 XL250 K0 produces less than 12 horsepower at the rear wheel in stock condition.  I can't find my original specs, but I'm pretty sure it was less than 10 actual ponies.  NOT a powerful engine, but it was innovative and virtually bullet-proof.  I will update this comment with dyno readings if I can document them.  98.194.39.86 (talk) 02:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, sir!  I own a 1973 Honda XL250 that runs like new.  I also have the original (green) shop manual in a binder and I am certain that the max power is around 9HP.  This bike is NOT fast or powerful.  There is NO way this bike produces anything like 20+ HP.  Never did, never will.  Someone should correct this. 174.170.93.139 (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horsepower Claim Is Too High