lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Urban ecosystem

message: I am not very familiar with this topic, but I think it is a concept applicable to any country. Some of the information pertains only to Australia. There are urban ecosystems in all countries, so the article should focus first on the general information common to all urban ecosystems, and then focus on the particular countries where it is being studied. --Doctor C (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broader scope 

message: This entry reads like an 'about us'  page or a press release from an Australian organization,  not like an encyclopedia entry on the topic. It should be revised to remove specific references to one organization, and to better address, explain and define 'urban ecosystems.' Richiejay (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm a bit confused about the ties to Australia. I think it undermines the article and furthers the bias of research on the topic. Greenwashed98 (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press release 

message: — Assignment last updated by Queen0527 (talk) 21:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse

message: Hey I'm wondering about this bibliography section? seems like it might be redundant if the citations are already done correctly through the wiki editor?  Greenwashed98 (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bibliography? 

message: — Assignment last updated by AtriumDru (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ESPE Capstone Seminar

message: Jdljd 2402:AD80:113:9644:1:0:798E:7248 (talk) 03:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kamran khan menrani
Talk:N. S. Krishnan

message: This article seems to heavily biased towards N.S.Krishnan calling Lakshmikantan a criminal, etc. I doubt if this is an "universally held view". Also, the trivia section looks as if it has been intended for publicity for N.S.Krishnan.--Rustam 01:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Walkabout (magazine)

message: A bot removed the image of the first cover discussed in the article as 'non-free'. I have restored it after receiving the message "Thanks for uploading File:Walkabout Cover Nov 1934.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring image of first cover
Talk:Nancy Beiman

message: Hello. I have no affiliation with Nancy Beiman; I'm just a regular editor. I have a request. Currently, there is no information regarding Nancy or her achievements that are dated before she won the NCS Division Award. I believe it should be this article's goal, among other goals, to give better context as to why she won the award in 1984. Plenty of people could find out about this article from the NCS Division Award page, so naturally, they would be curious to learn more about the work(s) that either earned her the award or were made at about the same time as what earned her the award. I'm not suggesting that Wikipedia commentates/ speculates on what it was about the work(s) that led to the award, but works with her name attached to it from that timeframe seem to be of minor cultural importance, and therefore should not be left out, if possible. 
UnderCloud (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There was so much erroneous information in this article that I updated it myself. There is a great deal of biographical information about me online. My website, https://nancybeiman.com links to an early interview by Janet Benn. I removed the erroneous credits. The Internet Movie Database has also been updated and has the corrected credits. 142.115.93.55 (talk) 14:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request: Information prior to 1984
Talk:St. Simon (horse)

message: This article claimed the horse to be the most successful in history yet he ranked only 4th on the Sporting Times list? I think we need some references here to make this a better article. JodyB 11:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: You may delete it because I don't have an English source.
: July 17, 1886. Sporting Times.
* 1. 65 - Gladiateur
* 2. 63 - West Australian
* 3. 62 - Isonomy
* 4. 53 - St. Simon
* 5. 52 - Blair Athol
* 6. 49 - The Flying Dutchman
* 7. 36 - Virago
* 7. 36 - St. Gatien
* 9. 34 - Ormonde
* 10. 31 -  Robert the Devil
Source: Japanese Wikipedia References #5.
--Galopin 17:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sporting Times list
Talk:National Press Club (Australia)

message: I have started this off. If anyone can fix up the refs a bit - I am not sure this is the right format - that would be appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.160.75 (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ten years later, I note that the bulk of this article's content (and 80% of its citations) is still about this trivial, old-hat "worm" incident. Surely we can do better than this! Bjenks (talk) 14:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wormgate 

message: Not to be confused with the annual Boyer Lecture. ----MountVic127 (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPCA 

message: Not to be confused with the weekly interview program on ABC.   One plus One ----MountVic127 (talk) 05:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One plus One 

message: Not to be confused with painted interview on ABC.  Anh's brush with fame  Anhn Do paints portrait while conducting interview. ----MountVic127 (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anh's brush with fame
Talk:Neil Paterson (writer)

message: I notice the referance of a 1986 example of "something like a poem" by neil paterson under the bibliography of James Edmund Neil Paterson of greenock Scotland, this edition shares the ISBN number with an earlier edition (1985) published by Arthur H. Stockwell Ltd. This example was writen by another writer of the same name(Neil Paterson born Wakefield 1961-).This would suggest that the 1986 citing is an error which should be corrected and investigated.
Copies of the 1985 edition are available in the Oxford University libraries.If someone has found a copy of the 1986 edition of the book under a publisher other than Arthur H. Stockwell Ltd I would be interested to know.
From WorldCat "Something like a poem
Author(s): Paterson, Neil, 1961-
Publication: Ifracombe : Stockwell,
Year: 1985
Description: 32 p. ; 15 cm.
Language: English
Standard No: ISBN: 0722319886 :; 9780722319888' ==
SUBJECTS
Identifier:Poetry in Englih,1945-- Texts
Class Description:Dewey: 821/.914
Responsibility:Neil Paterson.
Document Type:book
Entry:19860407
Update:20070309
Accession No:OCLC:13670822
Database: WorldCat"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Euan247 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible bilbliography error.
Talk:Nguyễn Võ Nghiêm Minh

message: Which is the surname? Badagnani (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname
Talk:Nick Love

message: H. I see his last film premiered in August 2012, nothing to report since but that does not mean to say his career is over, does it? Govindaharihari (talk) 17:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  still active
Talk:James Hutchison Stirling

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.giffordlectures.org/lecturers/james-hutchison-stirling. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 17:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Nigel Cole

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Novy Mir

message: Support the Split. Splitting would make sense. Greenshed 11:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, there's hardly enough material for two articles.  Grue  20:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: support. The amount of material is irrelevant. These are different things, hence different articles. Wikipedia is not paper. `'mikka 21:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Support.  They are clearly of different importance.  Would even suggest removing NY section altogether.  Mhym 06:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Against. I am against the split. In the 1960s the magazine continued the dissident tradition of the first (NY) Novy Mir; there is a clear connection between the two. --Badvibes101 (talk) 03:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Comment: I almost did the split myself, but then i looked at the talk page. If there is indeed a "clear connection" between the two, i can't really see it in the article body. If the article can show it, then it really shouldn't be split. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-wrote the article (which needed a clean-up); tried to show the link between the two. Hope I've made it clear why we don't need the split. --Badvibes101 (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Support: There is no historical connection (a vague "dissident tradition" is not enough, and in any case the Soviet magazine was not "dissident" except to a limited extent at certain times), and no one who comes to the entry will be looking for the obscure NY magazine.  The NY should be split off or deleted, and the entry considerably expanded for the Soviet version, one of the most important literary magazines of the 20th century. Languagehat (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: The official website has a cover image (in low-res) of the July 1925 issue (No. 7). Perhaps someone could work out the copyright and upload it here so it can be used in the infobox? —Hugh (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover of early issue
Talk:Pernod Ricard Winemakers

message: This article is a stub. The winery articles it references are either stub or very short. There isn't enough content in any of them to warrant separate articles, therefore I propose they be merged into a cohesive whole. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure it would be a good idea, since we're talking about articles about wineries which existed under other ownership longer than they were part of Pernod Ricard? Tomas e (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge winery stubs here
Talk:Nikos Koundouros

message: The "left-wing resistance movement EAM-ELAS" should properly be called the "Communist resistance movement EAM-ELAS". Except of course if he was a member post war (which his internment then suggests) it should be summarised as "Communist rebel movement EAM-ELAS"Royalcourtier (talk) 02:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  left-wing resistance movement EAM-ELAS? 
Talk:Arnórr jarlaskáld

message: The metre is attested in at least two lines before his day, in what remains of Hafgerðingadrápa. Cheers Io (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hrynhenda 
Talk:Bersi Skáldtorfuson

message: Bersi Skáld-Torfuson is how it is written in Icelandic. The version Skáldtorfuson is a bad one, and probably a invention of somebody that didn´t know what the name means. His father was called Skáld-Torfi.  --157.157.37.67 08:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, his mother was called Skáld-Torfa. I picked the spelling used by Finnur Jónsson, yours is certainly valid as well. Haukur 09:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think Bersi was captured at Nesjar. He probably followed Earl Sveinn in exile, and returned to Norway after the Earl had died. See Finnur Jónsson Den oldnorske og oldislandske litteraturs historie, I, 1920, p 564f. Srv.rosen (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Einar Benediktsson

message: I added a references tag but I am not actually sure what the Further reading section has in it. Regardless, if there are references there, then they still need to be in-line. Leefkrust22 (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Noriaki Yuasa

message: What makes Kinenote a reliable source? I can not find anything about how they gather the information on their site. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's on IMBD though and you link to that in the external links, just change it to that. A quick google translate of the DVDs has his name, they can't lie about that on a product cause sellers have to properly label it. 2601:649:200:3490:5C9E:77D0:1303:4984 (talk) 22:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not doubting it exists, its a matter of getting the information about it from a proper source that follows WP:RS. For example, we don't use IMDb as a source on Wikipedia per WP:RS/IMDb. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Kinenote
Talk:Zveno project

message: Can somebody transliterate?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  17:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Tsirk". I'm guessing it means "circus". Drutt (talk) 19:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What a Цирк

message: Correct me if I am wrong but I have SPB to mean -
Skorostnoi Pikiruyushchnyi Bombardirovshchik – fast dive bomber, which applies only to the I-16 derived element!!. Any Comments/discussion? Petebutt (talk) 07:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPB ?
Talk:Ransomes, Sims & Jefferies

message: Extract (verbatim) from page at British Lawnmower Museum:
::Extract from Ransome Archive
::RANSOMES, SIMMS & JEFFRIES OF IPSWICH
::Ransomes started in 1789.  They commenced producing lawnmowers from 1836, buying the patent off Edwin Budding, who invented the lawnmower (Mr. Budding originally used the 'mower' to remove knots of the top of cloth).
::In 1867 they introduced a totally new design of Lawnmower, the Automaton, (remembering that the chain and petrol engine had not been invented yet) which became an instant success with over 1,000 machines being sold in the first season. This design was to put Ransomes above the two other producers Shanks of Arbroath in Scotland and Greens of Leeds & London at that time.
This information is provided here in case it is of use to anyone editing this page.
I have also included this on the "Lawn mower" talk page.
EdJogg 11:49, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ransomes Lawnmowers

message: Article mentions that Ransomes & Rapier was formed as a split from the original company, so what happened to the original company? Ransomes & Rapier (NB -- currently redirects to this article) was a heavy engineering company, not just a manufacturer of agricultural machinery as implied by the lede. Shouldn't they have a separate article? EdJogg (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ransomes & Rapier 

message: It's my recollection that R & R was taken over by Newton Chambers and that, a bit later, this was taken over by Robert Maxwell. Maxwell came to Ipswich and spoke to the workforce promising wonderful things (NCK had been disappointing) but soon afterwards much equipment was taken to another site in Bath where it was allowed to rust in the open. Quite possibly he bought it for its pension fund.
I cannot find any reference in the Times but hope to find one elsewhere. It will all be in the Evening Star but finding it is another matter and I live 200 miles away as well. That's assuming that Ipswich Library has preserved the Evening Star. Budhen (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ransomes and Rapier / NCK / Robert Maxwell 

message: There's nothing in the article on Ransomes forklifts. I'll dig out my information and update the article. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 04:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ransomes Forklifts 
Talk:Norman Dawn

message: The filmography listed is unsourced and mostly wrong. For example (first is a real film and should remain listed, the other are mostly extremely dubious):
* "Missions of California" (1907) - made, but probably unlisted at IMDb: http://hrc.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15878coll15/id/7#nav_top
* "Gypsy Love" (1910) - there are several film with the title, but none from 1910 and none connected with Dawn outside of this page
* "Women of Toba" (1910) - no films with the title seems to be made and the only connection of the title with Dawn is on this page
* "Story of the Andes" (1911) - this seems to be a real film, as per "A Technological History of Motion Pictures and Television" (p. 142)
* "Ghost of Thunder Mountain" (1912) - no such film seems to exist and the only mention is on this page
* "Man of the West" (1912) - no films with the title seems to be made and the only connection of the title with Dawn is on this page
* "The Drifter" (1913) - this actually seems to be a real film, although only completed by Dawn, as per "A Technological History of Motion Pictures and Television" (p. 143)StjepanHR (talk) 15:51, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography
Talk:Metropolitan Borough of Sefton

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. Tevildo (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: When the borough was created in the Local Government Act 1972....
Borough status in the United Kingdom suggests that, alone among all the metropolitan districts created in 1974, as a result of the Local Government Act 1972, Sefton did not become a borough.  The three former boroughs, Bootle, Crosby and Southport had charter trustees created to maintain their borough and mayoral status, which were abolished when the metropolitan district was granted borough status the following year, in 1975.  Why Sefton was treated differently to every other metropolitan district, I haven't a clue.  Nor can I find any confirmation of this elsewhere.  Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council's website suggests that Sefton was a metropolitan borough from day one, and this is reiterated here.  However, on the list of past mayors, the absence of any mayor for the period from the district's inception in 1974 until 1975, suggests that the Borough status article is probably correct.  Skinsmoke (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borough status 

message: The page states that as of an alleged mid-2019 estimate, Sefton has a population of 273,790. However, there is no source to verify that any such 'estimate' has been carried out, and indeed that 273,790 figure is the exact same one recorded in the 2011 census. Why is this figure presented as something it is not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.204.245 (talk) 22:21, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the population really a 'Mid-2019 estimate'?
Talk:Norman Wexler

message: do we want to add details from Zmuda's anecdotes of being his assistant?  Are there other references about him? 168.251.194.18 (talk) 16:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * 6 August (lede)
* 16 August (infobox)
Both these dates also appear online. Can we know for certain which is correct? --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Yury Chernavsky

message: * Sirs. Please help me with wikification of the article or give me some advice. Thanks a lot --GC 21:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome!

message: Hi Michael, may I leave the article as is for a while? Is it not so ugly? --GC 13:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Post

message: Yury Chernavsky --GC 22:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Marry Christmas everybody!'''
Talk:Nurul Alam Atique

message: : Whats problem with this category? ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: One small problem. Nurul Alam Atique never won that award. Aditya(✉ • ⚒) 16:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now there is a second problem - you have started an edit war in an article under DS. You may be in for big trouble. Do I report you now, or would you refrain from warring over a hoax? Aditya(✉ • ⚒) 16:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have reviewed all the Awards list from Govern Database and make it correct. Thanks for your information! But, it's not the right way to approach. Seems you are just very much interested to make revert. Isn't it? Cause, you told Atique, never got this Cinematography award but you didn't remove the Cinematography template. Also, already knowing this right information you have no objection with the entire award list (where it was wrong) but the category. ‍‍‍‍It takes a second to revert an edit but it takes more time to make an edit. Thanks. ~Moheen (keep talking) 18:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for reminding. That irrelevant template has been removed now. Also thanks for reminding that more of the hoaxes may be floating around. Maybe I will check all of them for their encyclopedic value and compliance with Wikipedia guidelines and policies (which, of course, includes removing all hoaxes). As for the right or wrong of the approach, you definitely can complain at WP:PUMP about how Wikipedia is wrong and you are right. Aditya(✉ • ⚒) 19:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem
Talk:Stockland Shellharbour

message: Removed self-published tag - please elaborate here before re-adding. All information in this article is either public knowledge or verifiable from the centre-owner's own site. Scott (talk) 08:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled