lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Splash Damage

message: The link to the "official website" is broken. I am unable to find the new address using Google (everything I find refers to the obviously-outdated one instead) so I am unable to fix it myself.
:It's because the site *is* broken. It went down like a week ago. Apparently some problem occurred on the server. They have a holding page now, at the root of the site, saying they'll be back soon. There's no "new address", and the current one isn't "obviously-outdated". It's just down. --zeh 23:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just FYI, the website is back. --201.26.123.215 14:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link broken 

message: Why is arkham origins in the list of Games developed ? --Johnny Bin (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  arkham origins ? 

message: Despite former CEO Paul Wedgwood leaving the company, shouldn't he still be listed as a founder? Compare for example with Id_Software and Facebook which both list all original founders despite them having left the company.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sn7d (talk • contribs) 02:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The founders are a matter of historical record, it's not a statement of who the current shareholders are. Locki should be included. Inopinatus (talk) 02:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founders 

message: Splash Damage is owned by Radius Maxima, which is listed as the parent of SD. Leyou is currently listed as the owner of SD, but Leyou is being wholly acquired by Image Frame Investment, a wholly owned subsidiary of Tencent. So, once the deal is finalized later this month, Tencent transitively owns SD, so should SD's owner be changed from Leyou to Tencent at that time? Sn7d (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Tencent be listed as the owner of SD?
Talk:The Christian Post

message: I've removed the links to the Christian Post from the Rick Warren and Charles Colson pages. External links from those pages should be of direct relevance to them. It is not sufficient that they are occasional contributors to the Christian Post. If they are a major contributor, say so in the Warren or Colson article, with a link to this article, rather than just put in an external link with no explanation. (Wikipedia guide is that Wikipedia links are preferable to external links, i.e. better a Wiki link to The Christian Post than an external link to http://www.christianpost.com ) Rocksong 01:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlinking 

message: The list of notable contributors was hard to read. I have edited the general format of the page to be more readable. I also added the membership section so that it could be easily discovered. In my opinion the article still needs small restructuring work. Flofor15 (talk) 18:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization

message: The "Notable contributors" section has had no sources added since the request was made over two years ago. The list very well may be valid, but must have references to confirm them. Consider this fair notice that the section could be removed per WP:Sources if the deficiency is not corrected. --Blainster (talk) 01:06, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable contributors section unsourced
Talk:Alien Breed 3D

message: This article was randomly chosen for the beta test within the mysimpleshow pilot project. The goal of this project is to provide Wikipedians with a simple to use tool in an attempt to promote high-quality video content in Wikipedia articles. In order to get started and evaluate process and tool needs, the project has created 50 videos in an automated process about randomly chosen Wikipedia articles.
The workflow looks as follows:
# An initial video draft is provided on the Youtube (access is possible only with this link)  
# The video project is available on mysimpleshow.com (please login with the credentials provided below)
# The login credentials needed to edit this video (so you don't have to create your own account on mysimpleshow) are: 
User Login: wikipedia+Alien_Breed_3D@mysimpleshow.com
Password: 8*T+N3a#
Everyone is invited to edit the video, finalize it, and publish the video file to Wikicommons and / or embed it to the respective Wikipedia article.
In case of any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me via talk page. --Norma.jean (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Loves Explainer Videos: beta test project 
Talk:Abadazad

message: Thanks to User:Savre's delightful additions (and my small efforts), I think I can justifiably delete this "importance" box. rewinn 15:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, the above comment is in reference to :Template:Importance which was placed on the article, not the :Template:Comicsproj on this page. --GentlemanGhost 12:02, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Play! Pokémon

message: There is a pretty big topic on the article, found here: http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?p=647091#post647091
-This thread last saw activity in 2006 and is no longer useful nor up to date. - Anonymous
While most of the real discussion should be on this site, that is where it actually is right now. Maybe more of the editors will use this option instead.
--Big Tex 01:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Discussion

message: A lot of the topics covered in Organized play should have their own articles, including extensive winner lists for the premier events and the Professor Program.
--Big Tex 01:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Articles
Talk:Honda Racing Corporation

message: I created this article because there are numerous other articles linked here. I'm not able to find a lot of info on HRC except through their website, so a lot of the wording is very "commercial" which I don't like. Please help contribute here. Roguegeek 01:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 

message: I'd like to find a nice image of the HRC logo to replace the image of the RC211V. Can't seem to find a nice one that can be used for promotional purposes. Happy hunting. Roguegeek 04:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Image
Talk:Xerxes II

message: Can those pictographs be moved to a proper dedicated section? InedibleHulk (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very wide infobox
Talk:Sogdianus

message: This article states that he was suceeded by Xerxes ii but this is inconsistent with him being described as having killed and succeeded Xerxes II — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.2.24.7 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent 
Talk:Hidden camera

message: I know there's "Lente Loco" on Spanish-language television. It would be good to add international examples to the article to the extent possible.Lawikitejana 01:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: International examples?

message: About 5 months ago, an editor created the article Hidden camera shows by copying and pasting this article. I have gone through he history of the newer article and added nearly all of the good faith, worthwhile edits to Hidden camera (the only exception was some copy editing that adapted the intro to the new article title) and redirected Hidden camera shows back here.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What about hidden camera films? Right now this article makes it seem Hidden camera is just a shortcut for Hidden camera shows. -Lwc4life (talk) 08:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged info from Hidden camera shows 

message: The list looks kinda messy at the moment, could we move it into a table?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.56.220 (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge List into a Table

message: I just removed two sections for TV shows that aren't as devoted to hidden camera usage, but I left the main one "In reality television" intact.  Personally I don't think any of them except for the most notable ones should be listed here - any thoughts? -download ׀ talk 02:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV shows 

message: Maybe it should be added that 99% of these shows are scripted? The "victims" are actors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.240.89.135 (talk) 21:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  actors 

message: Which 13 states are nanny cams illegal? Jojo Fazbear (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality  
Talk:Hakor

message: During the admittedly short-lived 29th Dynasty, the Persian invaders were successfully rebuffed. Assigning "feeble" to the dynasty can result in erroneously conflating the short duration with its achievements, which is patently false. And simply in general, I think "feeble" is derogatory, has no place in an encyclopedic resource, and should be deleted. 47.151.133.231 (talk) 05:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing derogatory adjective
Talk:Ecuadorian–Colombian War

message: I just effectively rewrote this article (which I'd been meaning to create), adding in details and also adding the section on historiography (which I think is useful in indicating that readers should be cautious about details about this war).  I also made several changes to the initial table, including switching the outcome from territorial gain by Ecuador to a return to the status quo ante bellum.  Someone who speaks Spanish better than I may be able to add a lot more. Weisacre 19:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: the correct name would be New Granada-Ecuador War since it was a war between New Granada and Ecuador. Colombia did not exist basically. --((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 16:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Besides this article doesn't have reliable references,  the editors are wrong about the subject treated herein.
The article (and its source, which seems to be this website) relates what happened during the Battle of Cuaspud (Batalla de Cuaspud in Spanish), which took place in 1863, however the real Colombian-Ecuadorian War occurred in 1832, as has been written in the Spanish Wikipedia (here) with clear references.--Shadowxfox (talk) 17:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite: Wrong date and sources 

message: I've read all these comments here and I'm a bit confused;
Are you guys saying this war of 1863 was just one isolated battle, and that the real war happened in 1832? Am I getting this right? FatMax1492 (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Needed 

message: there were 2 wars one in 1832 that lasted almost all that year it started when ecuador took position of several territories of the encontes new granada, also when those territories joined ecuador not everyone was satisfied and the new granada (now colombia) did not like this and they began the confrontations that ended with the Colombian or New Granada victory, although the combat forces are unknown and just as dead. this war is known as the cauca war.
on the other hand, the war of 1863 is a more complex and difficult to explain war that is linked to the civil war of those years, although the confrontations began at the end of 1863, ending with the Colombian victory in Cuaspud, the conflict began in the early 1960s, producing the battle of tulcan and many skirmishes although you can consult the spanish wikipedia searching guerra del cauca 1832,batalla de tulcan,batalla de cuaspud  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hailcolombia2009 (talk • contribs) 05:24, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification
Talk:Anglo-Egyptian War

message: This article covers basically the same subject as the Urabi Revolt article. However, that article is better written. Perhaps the two should be combined? Isenhand 05:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urabi Revolt 

message: Wikipedia has articles referring to this man either as Orabi or Urabi.  Is there any evidence that his name was ever spelled in either of these ways at the time?
All the contemporary sources I have seen spell his name Arabi.  That suggests to me that Wikipedia ought to standardise on Arabi.--Toddy1 19:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arabi or Urabi or Orabi

message: Why the term "conquest"? Are we in the middle ages?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:5D07:E706:502C:671B:FC2B:3D47 (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conquest? 

message: Why not "invasion" or "occupation"? At least, the Egyptian perspective should be mentioned. The English intervention in an internal Egyptian affair (revolt or not) cannot be characterized as "Anglo-Egyptian War. Imagine someone calling the US invasion of Iraq "the US-Iraq War".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:5D07:E706:ED51:FE3F:E333:B493 (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Egyptian War?
Talk:Nectanebo II

message: I'm no expert but this article doesn't mention what his prenomen is; you have to go to the page on the thirtieth dynasty for that. Isn't that bad form? Stevekl 16:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did not know the Eghptian king had Sex with Olympias,(mother of Alexander who had sex with Philip of Macadon and was also said to have sex with Alexander and his girlfriend and raped Alexanders befriend).Dressed out as Amun What was the child called after being born form this sexual intercouse?I would love to know more about the Sex and what was done during it
I am assuming you're not a native English speaker and therefore missed the intent of describing that episode. The Egyptians disliked foreign rule, so the intent of the tale was to make Alexander a legitimate heir to the throne of Egypt as the son of Nectanebo-Ammun and Olympias.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.71.222 (talk) 04:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Having sleped?Sex with Olympus 

message: The reference to H. R. Hall. "Cambridge's Ancient History of Greece" does not do to much good; it's lacking year, which volume, and the link goes to some not related advertisment. --Finn Bjørklid (talk) 22:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: The page for the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston doesn't mention a head of this pharaoh, granite or otherwise, but the page for the Museum of Fine Arts, Lyon mentions the green sandstone head shown in the Infobox. It seems likely that this is the museum that has the pharaoh's head. Can someone verify whether there are 2 heads or 1, where they are, and their material?Mikenlesley (talk) 02:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portraits 

message: The black siltstone obelisk is captioned saying Thoth was twice-great, when everybody knows it was thrice.
Indeed, even viewing more details on the image, the true caption is "thrice-great". 98.97.119.103 (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoth was thrice-great, not twice 

message: — Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt
Talk:Saudi–Yemeni war (1934)

message: i Believe that Asir and Najran have been under local Tribes conquest , not under Yemeni conquest as the article say , please post 3 Sources at least and fill the article , in case i'll report this whithin 7 days Ammar 02:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact. 

message: Please correct the last paragraph in the article. You cannot send warships to Sana; it's not a coastal city!
:Thank you for noticing this.  It has been corrected.  Black Falcon 16:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sana is not a coastal city! 

message: I have had a go at rewriting most of this, backed by citations,  and put the description of the war into chronological order as much as possible.   I've removed some of the unreasonable statements which were already in the article,   but I've also left some of the odd POV stuff in although I could not find reference to either endorse or refute them.Eregli bob (talk) 10:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:UIUC Residence Halls

message: As a recent UIUC alumus, I have to wonder if this article is really necessary.  If this thing goes up for an AfD vote, leave me a note on my talk page.  -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 01:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I updated the page to the best of my ability (I didn't really know what to do about the dead links) do you guys think the page still needs the updated tag? Atontado (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated tag 
Talk:Alexander IV of Macedon

message: So where's the evidence that Alexander IV was recognized as Pharaoh? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 01:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Few days ago I reverted an edit about Alexander III's conspiracy, see here for details and my reasons in edit summary. Now a very similar section was added by an IP, see here. I would like to ask to more knowledgeable editors such as  and  what they think about that. IMO the source provided (readable here) is valid but misused/misinterpreted, and I retain my reasons given in the edit summary. Khruner (talk) 10:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It does look like synthesis... Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy section 
Talk:Verbal Kint

message: If someone types "Verbal Kint" in the search box and gets Keyser Soze, the movie is already spoiled for them. All the spoiler banners in the world aren't going to help, because it's the freaking title. That's why this page shouldn't just be "#redirect Keyser Soze". Grok? —Keenan Pepper 01:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...And redirecting to The Usual Suspects doesn't make much sense either, unless Keyser Soze redirects there too. Which might not be a bad idea, but for now... —Keenan Pepper 01:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is actually exactly what should be done, because the Keyser Soze page full of original research and unverifiable claims. I put those templates on that page to see if those who follow it can clean it up. If not, it should just be a redirect. What do you think? --Tcatts 13:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, aren't you concerned that you're creating an enormous task for yourself? Every character in every tv show, book, and movie that doesn't have his or her own page now needs to have their redirect changed to this? Is there even any consensus that this is what should be done? --Tcatts 13:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, every character? Why do you say that? Only characters whose true identities are a matter of suspense need these special redirects. —Keenan Pepper 07:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: WP:NODISCLAIMERS/WP:NOTCENSORED -- Wikipedia does not support spoiler warnings, and movie articles are written with summaries that already spoil them. Besides, no one would usually search for a character without looking for the character so would look for spoiled information already. This movie is ancient, and the very twist is a meme and commonly used example. -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects and spoilers 

message: Fine, do whatever you want, I don't care. Don't even discuss it on the talk page first. —Keenan Pepper 02:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NODISCLAIMERS/WP:NOTCENSORED -- Wikipedia does not support spoiler warnings, and movie articles are written with summaries that already spoil them. Besides, no one would usually search for a character without looking for the character so would look for spoiled information already. This movie is ancient, and the very twist is a meme and commonly used example. -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 08:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting to [[The Usual Suspects]]
Talk:Berenice I of Egypt

message: ==Untitled==
article needs to be soured it look like that there a place for sources but it been taken away do not know why?Oo7565 06:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone had added a bogus statement at one point, which I reverted along with its equally bogus source, but I forgot to remove the otherwise-empty references section, which I have now done.  The rest is essentially whats in the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica, as stated.  --Chris Bennett 06:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: why tag was added

message: article needs to be soured it look like that there a place for sources but it been taken away do not know why?Oo7565 06:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone had added a bogus statement at one point, which I reverted along with its equally bogus source, but I forgot to remove the otherwise-empty references section, which I have now done.  The rest is essentially whats in the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica, as stated.  --Chris Bennett 06:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Berenice II of Egypt

message: In about 249 BC, she was married to Demetrius the Fair, a Macedonian prince, soon after her father died. However after coming to Cyrene he became the lover of her mother Apama. In a dramatic event, she had him killed in Apama's bedroom, but Apama lived on afterwards. This happened around 255 or 250 BC. She had no children with Demetrius.
:Since dates B.C. count backwards, how was it that she married Demetrius in 249, but murdered him in 250 or 255 (either one or six years earlier)? 69.42.7.212 (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date confusion? 

message: Wasn't she actually regent and ruling queen of Cyrene after her father's death? Shouldn't she be placed in a succession-box of the monarchs of Cyrene? This has been neglected. --Aciram (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruling queen of Cyrene?  

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support Actually they're not all "of Egypt", but precisely because of that I support. PatGallacher (talk) 00:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Ronald L. Burgess Jr.

message: In the photograph provided for LTG Burgess a Defense Distinguished Service Medal is visible next to the Defense Superior Service Medal with two oak leaf clusters, but is not listed in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.236.30 (talk) 23:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Awards and Decorations

message: The photograph shown is not his correct official photograph.  It has been updated to show an alternate, incorrect photograph. Can this new incorrect photo file be replaced with the original correct file? Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Au leslie (talk • contribs) 13:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Photo
Talk:Arsinoe III of Egypt

message: Because while I'm intrigued by that possibility, it seems to me how her story is painted in other sources aren't consistent with her having that much influence, and often treat her as basically a Prisoner in her own palace for her time as Queen.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there are Source other then Third Maccabees for her being at the Battle of Raphia? 
Talk:Cleopatra I Syra

message: http://www.tyndalehouse.com/Egypt/ptolemies/cleopatra_i_fr.htm
It seems to me very unlikely she wasn't born until 204 BC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.229.89 (talk) 13:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   She was Born sooner then that I'm pretty sure. 

message: Answer 85.239.197.67 (talk) 09:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is she First plotomy queen who ratify of eygapt god
Talk:Cleopatra IV

message: Is there a way to change the template so that it does not list Ptolemy IX of Egypt and Antiochus IX Cyzicenus as her wives? NightBear (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wives?? 
Talk:Ptolemy X Alexander I

message: The J. Paul Getty Museum Journal: Volume 14, 1986 page 73 include a photo of a seal that might depict Ptolemy X--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 13:13, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

message: The Ancestry section shows the ancestry for Ptolemy IX Lathyros, not Ptolemy X Alexander.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.233.158.234 (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry section wrong 