Talk:George, Washington

message: Removed this: ( It is the only city in the United States, named for a President.) Lincoln, Nebraska is a counterexample that pops readily to mind.
Probably someone meant something like "It's the only city that when read with its state's name afterward sounds like the name of a president" but I'm not sure of what value that particular fact might be... -- Someone else 02:15, 10 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't find it amazing at all. I find it perfectly "normal" (not acceptable, mind you, but normal) that people would choose to vandalize a page for a town with a unique name. -- 70.57.75.185 (talk) 21:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just wondering why user SDY cross-linked this Columbia Gorge city's page with that of another city on the Panama-canal on 7 June. Maybe they are "sister-cities"? Should we make clearer what the connection is? Bookerj (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross-Link with Cristóbal, Colón

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on George, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2 to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The link to the city Web site is wrong.  I'm not going to fix it, because I don't edit Wikipedia anymore. SimpsonDG (talk) 14:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on George, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081008092300/http://www.ci.george.wa.us/history.html to http://www.ci.george.wa.us/history.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061127025315/http://www.ci.george.wa.us/ to http://www.ci.george.wa.us/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061127025315/http://www.ci.george.wa.us/ to http://www.ci.george.wa.us/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "The racial makeup of the city was 38.1% White, 1.4% Native American, 59.9% from other races, and 0.6% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 75.0% of the population."
75.0% Hispanic or Latino when 38.1% White?  Misplaced decimal point?
154.5.158.238 (talk) 04:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The data from the 2010 census on which that statement was based is here.  The statement accurately reflects the source data.  Race and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are not the same metric, and one cannot expect to add the percentages of each to arrive at 100%. General Ization Talk   05:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Neither Hispanic nor Latino are a "race". They are considered an "ethnicity". There are both black and white Latinos, for example, which is why the wording says "Hispanic or Latino of any race". That said, it's a screwy way to say that. A little confusing. I'll try a simple rewrite. 76.178.169.118 (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racial Makeup is Screwy