lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pokemon Pal Park

message: Conditions
I believe this could go into further detail. Such as the fact you'll need at least 7 pokemon (so you have one left over) in order to do a transfer. 
And I'ld like to know if you have to reach a certain point in the older games in order to send them to Diamond and Pearl. (Rekija 00:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Officium Defunctorum (Victoria)

message: What about a mention of Cristóbal de Morales whose Officium Defunctorum actually predates that of Victoria?
24.62.230.90 (talk) 03:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morales 

message: #The title Officium Defunctorum is generic and applies to dozens (at least) of other works.
#The 1605 publication collects several works besides the 'Missa da requiem and omits numerous parts of the full Office.
#The 6-part Requiem should be identified as a reworked version of the 4-part Missa defunctorum
#The title page illustration doesn't match!
Sparafucil (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some problems
Talk:Incidental music

message: Theme songs:
The second second has a grammatical mistake and might also require a citation: "Theme songs are among the most work..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hookandloop (talk • contribs) 14:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does “noiseless” mean in the “Underscore” section of the article? It can’t actually be noiseless or it would be silent. Do we mean that there are no sound effects, only music? Felicity4711 (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Noiseless”?
Talk:Cross-entropy method

message: For the arg max on line 3 of the Generic CE algorithm pseudocode, what is u? Should the u instead be v?
That is, should 
 \mathop{\textrm{argmax}}_{\mathbf{v}} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N H(\mathbf{X}_i)\frac{f(\mathbf{X}_i;\mathbf{u})}{f(\mathbf{X}_i;\mathbf{v}^{(t-1)})} \log f(\mathbf{X}_i;\mathbf{v})
be changed to
 \mathop{\textrm{argmax}}_{\mathbf{v}} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N H(\mathbf{X}_i)\frac{f(\mathbf{X}_i;\mathbf{v})}{f(\mathbf{X}_i;\mathbf{v}^{(t-1)})} \log f(\mathbf{X}_i;\mathbf{v})
--Tekhnofiend (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Schelomo

message: it appears to be almost entirely original research. And the only reference given is now a dead link. What does Schelomo signify, anyway? Is it a transliterated rendering of Solomon, from either Hebrew or Yiddish? This might be useful to add to the article. Milkunderwood (talk) 03:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is fun to read, but ...
Talk:Donald F. Glut

message: There is a citation for the "Writing Credits" section of the Donald F. Glut entry. This citaition stated that there is a tag on this entry since April due to missing citations or foot notes. I am new to Wikipedia and do not quite understand this. All entries I added to the Writing Credits section of the Donald F. Glut entry, which I did in April, were entries of books by Donald F. Glut and included the International Standard Book Number (ISBN) as a citation for the books I listed, which is, as the name implies, the international standard citation for verifiable book identification. The ISBN identifies the book  country, publisher, and corresponding entry in R.R. Bowker's Books in Print. I am not quite sure what other citation would be needed, ISBN is the most widely used and verifiable citation available, that I know of. Any help on this would be appreciated. Jarrock 00:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Abbythecat (talk) 07:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  books 

message: I changed the header to read "Selected Bibliography" as it's obviously not complete as the article says he published 65 books and there are omissions such as the Frankenstein novels he wrote. 23skidoo (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography header
Talk:Mike Colter

message: Is Colter of Gullah heritage? Badagnani 00:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gullah heritage

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect America is still the place. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Doug Mehus  T·C 22:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "America is still the place" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Cross section (geometry)

message: It is not surprising that there are no references for this article since it gets (at least from the mathematical point of view) so much wrong. Not enough attention is being paid to the dimensions of the objects involved. Mathematically the term is applied, almost exclusively, to three-dimensional objects and the intersection of such with a plane is in general a two-dimensional object lying in that plane. This article confuses these two-dimensional objects with their boundaries. Thus, the cross-section of a circular cylinder perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder is a disk, not a circle (which is the boundary of that disk). Some of this confusion is probably due to the long standing abuse of notation found in elementary geometry where, for example, a circle could mean either a disk or the boundary of that disk depending on the context. This reliance on context is of course unacceptable in modern mathematics, so we need to be more careful with our descriptions and use the proper terms. Reliable references would get these distinctions clearly stated.--Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points, and I'll add that "non-empty" seems superfluous to this description, as solid bodies are ipso facto not empty. (However, cross-sections in practical use, as in engineering, will often use outlines to represent areas conjoined by material behind the section view, as in this page's top image, showing, on the left, a through-hole in a compression seal. Such cross-sections effectively represent pictures of objects with cutaway areas, the cutaway being accomplished with a plane parallel to the frontal view. In photographic cross-sections, the "plane" may have been, say, a saw.) Mucketymuck (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is confused about the definition 

message: "Cross-section" (with a hyphen) seems to match more common spelling in the broader community (e.g.  versus ), and also within the present WP article.  The title should reflect that.  
—DIV (137.111.13.4 (talk) 02:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal:  move article to "Cross-section (geometry)" 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Tvärsnitt and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 13#Tvärsnitt until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 02:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tvärsnitt" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Quindim

message: * Please place references here for both the origin of the word and the pastry itself. Otherwise, it might appear made-up. Same thing for the whole article really. --Rocketman768 00:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins 

message: Ary Barroso wrote a song called "Os Quindins de Yaya" which is about quindims. Is "quindin" with an "n"  instead of an "m", also an acceptable spelling of the word?--Jpcase (talk) 22:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation!--Jpcase (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quindin or Quindim
Talk:Crossed product

message: It seems in here that there are no continuity condition on the action of the group on the algebra, is that true?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noix07 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

message: I notice that this page is all about the von Neumann algebra crossed products. I think there should be some information about the C*-algebra crossed products. Does this already exist? If not, is it better to add to the current page or to create a new page? Minimalrho (talk) 04:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  C*-algebraic version
Talk:Crossing number

message: I propose splitting this into two articles on knots and graphs and making this page a disambiguation.  Comments?  Incidentally, I am planning on expanding the knot theory one into an article probably about the length of the current one.  --C S (talk) 13:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok with me. They're unrelated topics that each deserve an article; in other cases of this nature we have two articles. My only concern is that WP:MOSDAB#Disambiguation pages with only two entries disrecommends making disambiguation pages with only two entries. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it only recommends not doing it when there is a primary meaning.  Do you think either one of the two is primary?  It's not so clear to me.  --C S (talk) 01:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor to me. Google scholar finds about 1000 articles for "crossing-number knot", about 2000 for "crossing-number graph", and about 4000 for "crossing-number". I wonder what the other 1000 are about... —David Eppstein (talk) 01:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split into separate article

message: Unlike stated in that section, the crossing number inequality apparently has been improved recently:
Pach, János; Radoi\v ci\'c, Rado\v s; Tardos, Gábor; Tóth, Géza Improving the crossing lemma by finding more crossings in sparse graphs.  Discrete Comput. Geom. 36 (2006), no. 4, 527--552. []
If the paper contains an unconditional (asymptotic) improvement over the known bound, this result should be included. (I haven't read through the paper yet.)Hermel (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They show that when e ≥ (103/6)v , the number of crossings is roughly 1/31.081 e2/v3, improving the previous constant by a little at a big expense in how dense the graph needs to be before the improvement kicks in. (The results we quote in the article are that when e ≥ 4v, we get a 1/64 factor, and when e ≥ 7.5v, we get a 1/33.75 factor. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Crossing Number Inequality
Talk:Matt Snider

message: I added the autobiography tag as Matt is currently active in editing his article (allowed, though generally viewed as a bad idea per Wikipedia:Autobiography). Once editing has quieted down, if an editor (other than Matt) looks the article over and doesn't see any NPOV issues, feel free to remove the tag. - Fordan (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a new editor and dropped in to fix a dead link. Along the lines mentioned by Fordan, I added an inline-promotion template because the last paragraph basically matches Matt's personal trainer advertisement. BumpusHound (talk) 16:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography tag
Talk:Tagliatelle

message: The IPA transcription contained two obvious errors, which I've corrected, but the transcription may still be incorrect, so I invite a review of that. My corrections were to replace two instances doubled consonants with a length marker. Doubled consonants would imply repitition of the entire sound, including onset, which is not what is intended. --Che Gannarelli (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 

message: There is no reason for the article to contain serving suggestions, as serving suggestions are unencyclopedic, and they are based on opinions, thus violating WP:NPOV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennercat (talk • contribs) 02:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serving suggestions? 

message: "Since tagliatelle are not made with pasta,..." What does it mean? I would say typical tagliatelle have diffferent texture than typical spaghetti, because they are typically not dried and contain eggs. Georgius.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.195.166.172 (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dishes 

message: The article is called Tagliatelle but the intro also refers to tagliolini, a similar yet different pasta type, usually served with diffrent sauces than tagliatelle. I think it would make sense to have one article for a single topic, rather than mixing the two, so I would suggest a split. --Desyman (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems there was already Taglierini explaining Tagliolini, so I moved the page as WP:COMMONNAME. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Talk:Sonata rondo form

message: While more discursive than the best sonata forms (in the hands of composers who understood what they were for- sonata forms of course are discursive enough when employed by composers who haven't a clue what they are doing) 
*and while it's true that while in the sonata form the focus is conflict, often between key centers, in the sonata-rondo the focus is generally melodic invention...
*Mozart (one of the innovators of this combination of the danse-en-rondeau favored by the late French baroque and the emerging sonata, as argued by Girdlestone in his book on Mozart's piano concertos) 
**tinkered with the sonata-rondo form over a period of years (and of pieces over one year... 1784 eg)
**wrote some works using this form that were only (I think it safe to say) relatively discursive- consider those that conclude the piano concertos 14 in E-flat, 16 in D and 19 in F. Schissel | Sound the Note! 12:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discourse
Talk:Tiger rattlesnake

message: In one section it is said that the toxicity of the venom is one third more than any other Western Hemisphere snake.  In another section it is stated that the Mojave rattlesnake venom is more toxic than the tiger rattlesnake venom. 68.185.32.178 (talk) 23:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venom toxicity 

message: Land snails are the largest species of snails in Africa 90.247.78.22 (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Land snail
Talk:Cup product

message: One passage near the end of the article reads as follows:
"When two submanifolds of a smooth manifold intersect transversely, their intersection is again a submanifold. By taking the fundamental homology class of these manifolds, this yields a bilinear product on homology. This product is dual to the cup product, i.e. the homology class of the intersection of two submanifolds is the Poincaré dual of the cup product of their Poincaré duals."
But transveral interesection of submanifolds does not in general directly  yield a bilinear product on homology, simply because not every homology class can be represented by an embedded submanifold.
However, according to René Thom's 1954 paper "Quelques proprietés globales . . .", every homology class has an integer multiple which is represented by the fundamental class of a submanifold.
So, if classes u, v have multiples U = K·u, V = L·v that are represented by submanifolds, we may define the intersection number i(u,v) as #(U ∩ V) / (K·L). (Here U and V are assumed to be perturbed if necessary so that they are transverse, and the size of their intersection is counted algebraically.)Daqu (talk) 04:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error: Not every homology class can be represented by a submanifold 

message: Being more comfortable with differential topology, I like to think of "cup product" by drawing analogy with exterior product. I guess they will be exactly equivalent in de Rham cohomology theory (which of course works only for smooth manifolds and not general topological spaces unlike cup product). But will it be a good idea to mention that analogy in an "intuitive explanation/analogy" section at the end of this article for people coming from differential topology background? Likewise, cap product can be considered to be analogous to "integration over fibre". -  Subh83 (talk | contribs) 23:14, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ahh... I see it's already there in the article. My bad! -  Subh83 (talk | contribs) 23:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  exterior product
Talk:List of sonatas

message: The article is quite incomplete and it seems too broadly scoped to try and complete it.  What's the goal of the list?  Every sonata ever written? DavidRF (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a little mystified too.  We list 11 of Haydn's piano sonatas, but he wrote 62!  We list only a selection of Mozart's.  What point is it making with these selected sonatas?  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  22:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the intention of this article? 

message: There's no list of sonatas in the Baroque era. Kevon kevono (Talk page) 10:04 PM, April 16, 2016 (PT)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Baroque Era

message: I am horrified to find that these two lists exclude music by women. I do not have time to spend right now to add the many dozens of Sonatas by women that should be included. I challenge the previous editors to spend some time considering and addressing this issue. Have composers of racial minorities been excluded as well? 03:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I was always taught in school that Fanny Mendelssohn was a woman. Was I misinformed? And what "two lists" are we speaking of? This talk page is attached only to one. Further, at the bottom, I find a note reading, "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it." What is stopping you?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 03:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women are excluded
Talk:Sonata da chiesa

message: Is the article referring to Mozart's "Church Sonatas"?  Mozart's pieces are brief single-movement works that were indeed meant to be played in church.  They were not multiple movement works in slow-fast-slow-fast format.  Is there an ambiguity here that should be clarified? DavidRF 19:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mozart's use of Sonata de chiesa
Talk:Society for Human Resource Management

message: No discussion ever occurred around the issues with the page or placing the flag on the page, so it should not be there. I've addressed the concerns within the flag relating to promotion and primary sources. Trying to add more third-party sources to the page.Hampersole (talk) 13:12, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag on Page 

message: In 2021, Time Magazine called SHRM "incredibly influential."
PetesPizza (talk) 02:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: SHRM's Influence
Talk:Edward L. Beach Sr.

message: Merging these entries is a goo idea, particulary with the forthcoming biography on his son by Dr. Finch. I would suggest using "Edward L. Beach, Sr." as the article header since that would be more grammatically correct.Marcd30319 01:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that "Edward L. Beach, Sr." should be the article title.  I think that the other article has some good detailed information but otherwise the "Edward L. Beach, Sr." article is much better. Some information from the previous article should be moved into this article before being merged. P.Haney 02:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

text: All right then I will finish merging the pages. P.Haney 21:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WAFY

message: WAFY is an eight-year exhaustive Postgraduate course in Islamic studies coupled with a recognized University degree in any secular discipline. This course was tailored to mould a new and promising generation of Islamic scholars with in-depth knowledge both in Islamic and secular studies. On Islamic stream, it follows the modified version of Muthavval, the postgraduate course cast in the mould of erstwhile Nizamiyya Syllabus which has been in vogue for centuries in higher Islamic studies in Kerala. While retaining the spirit of the traditional syllabus intact, modification was effected either by introducing some new topics or through revising some subjects with updated and modern versions. These measures are inevitable to meet the new challenges and needs of time. The course was named after and the graduates were entitled ‘Wafy', implying their having been moulded as scholars with command over two disciplines and with reference to the Quranic allusions: “…..and any one who fulfills what he has covenanted with Allah, Allah will soon grand him a great reward” (Fathah). for more details: http://www.wafycic.com/wafycourse.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MUNEERUDHEEN (talk • contribs) 05:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one class at a lesser-known University, so I am going to go say that this isn't notable.  With that said, if the "Wafy" class is available at other Colleges or Universities, then I would recommend the "Wafy" class have it's own page and the "WAFY" page be made into a disambig page so that the two articles (the radio station and the class) can be told apart. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 15:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Meaning
Talk:Lockheed P-7

message: Ths article states: "In October 1988, the U.S. Navy announced that Lockheed won the competition, as the company's proposal was significantly lower than that of the competitors." Lower? How? Fewer pages? Closer to the ground? In what way was their proposal "lower"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.18 (talk) 13:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The bid was lower in price/costs. - BilCat (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Then perhaps the article should reflect that...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.66.32 (talk) 03:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: I was an engineer who worked on the GE27, and as I recall it, the Boeing entry to the anti-sub competition was actually a modified 757. OK, yeah, it took about 10 seconds to find a reference that supports my memory. 98.232.40.141 (talk) 07:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified 737?
Talk:Yoshihiro Takahashi

message: I'm not 100% sure, but it seems like the mentioned airing date of Weed's anime adaptation is incorrect. I couldn't find any mention of the listed date (September 17th of 2005) anywhere, at least not with a quick search. Would it be alright to change it to the one listed in the series' own Wikipedia page (Nov 3rd, 2005)? Hiillosmakkara (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Weed" air date incorrect?
Talk:Pulsed rocket motor

message: I
:Well, it's not exactly my strongest point, but if you'll post the info here on the talkpage, I'll try to insert it into the article properly. Doc  Tropics 01:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! I'll leave a note on your talkpage explaining how : ) Doc  Tropics 21:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:WAJM

message: Disputing "WAJM has large African-American and Hispanic audiences."... no cited source for that "fact".  The audience may well be primarily in those ethnic groups, but whether the audience is "large" is highly suspect for a high school radio station...StreamingRadioGuide 18:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Are they using a radome?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.116.56.246 (talk) 19:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antenna and radome
Talk:WALK-FM

message: Does anyone know why KT Mills was fired.  The only thing I could find online is that the station wanted to go in a different direction.  Does anyone know what the new direction the station wants to go in is?  Thanks.
69.117.23.238 (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  KT Mills Fired 
Talk:WIFN (AM)

message: Radio Online is reporting that this station will shortly switch to sports talk.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 17:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

message: I don't care what Wikipedia's "standards" are, the world needs to know that DICK-ey broadcasting is a complete amateur joke! Pathetic signals, no transmitter maintenance, hours of dead air. The FCC needs to revoke their licenses!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.251.116.51 (talk) 03:32, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  what a joke