Talk:France–Germany relations

message: Germany did not become a state until the 1870's, so wouldn't it be more appropriate for the Prussian nation's relationship with france and the habsburgs relation with france be discussed in separate articles? Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.67.156 (talk) 22:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Are we really talking about France-Germany relations when we talk about the Habsburgs and Prussia?

message: Hey, I found out what the probleme is! The history part is a copyvio of "" (as it is noted in Wikipedia:Cleanup). Now, this explains why there are lot of ahistoricalities and nonsense ideas -- not only because it is a copyvio, but also and especially, because it is a copyvio of an alternate history website, describing an European unification process to an European Confederation that never happened in our thread of history. So, to stop the nonsense, I deleted everything I'm not 100% sure of (that is, most of the article). -- till we ☼☽ | Talk 22:12, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate History 

message: I don't see why all the microstates are included on this map (Andorra, Monaco, Lichtenstein, San Marion, Vatican, Macao, Dubai, Sao Tome, the Carribbean, etc.) I don't see what they have to do with the topic of the article, and why if someone went through all the trouble of making a world map, the French overseas departments weren't included (French Guiana, etc.) JesseRafe 07:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I think a map of Europe would be adequate and much easier to see. Oberiko 15:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  map image 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Shouldn't the history section begin somewhat earlier? The contrast between the extreme antagonism between France and Germany from 1870 to 1945 and their friendship since the 1950s is often highlighted and it seems lacking to me not to discuss it in this article. 96T (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There should definitly be a bit about the Weimar Republic and Aristide Briand and Gustav Stresemann. After all the two got the 1926 Nobel Peace Prize.--ospalh (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on France–Germany relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151225025456/http://fowid.de/fileadmin/datenarchiv/Religionszugehoerigkeit/Religionszugehoerigkeit_Bevoelkerung_2010_2013.pdf to http://fowid.de/fileadmin/datenarchiv/Religionszugehoerigkeit/Religionszugehoerigkeit_Bevoelkerung_2010_2013.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130201062414/http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/les-francais-a-l-etranger/la-presence-francaise-a-l-etranger/les-francais-etablis-hors-de/article/population-francaise-inscrite-au-103836 to http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/les-francais-a-l-etranger/la-presence-francaise-a-l-etranger/les-francais-etablis-hors-de/article/population-francaise-inscrite-au-103836
*Added  tag to https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015002369133%3Bview%3D1up%3Bseq%3D6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Iam gonna completly remove the part about political alliances. Sorry, but that part is just non-sensical, especially regarding the fact that EU-internal cooperation makes up like two paragraphs. The unification of both countries was never anything close to a thing, while the pushing for a common europa under the EU is actually very much a thing.
Its like having a part about "US-Canada political alliances" in which we talk about the very few people who actually wanted the two countries to unite, but dont waste a word on the NATO or Nafta.
--Aradir (talk) 14:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrific part about political alliances 

message: This old Time Magazine article has some interesting information about the French occupation of Rhine and Ruhr: French Policy. It appears after the French occupied Germany in 1923, Germans responded with sabotage. The French retaliated by fining entire villages and all individuals.
Jeffrey Walton  (talk) 03:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info on 1923 French occupation of German Rhine and Ruhr 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 07:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: France–Germany relations →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME; see ngrams and google scholar; 175 results for Franco–German relations since 2020, 4 results for France-Germany relations since 2020. "Franco-German relations" is currently an alt-title. BilledMammal (talk) 02:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

text: *Thank you, corrected move request. BilledMammal (talk) 03:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I support your modified proposal. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2022