Talk:The Teacher

message: This article should be merged into the Sir Leigh Teabing article. There's really no point in having this article seperate from the other one, is there? dposse 00:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is that if someone types in "The Teacher" and gets redirected to Sir Leigh Teabing, that spoils the book/movie for them, so it shouldn't be a simple redirect. —Keenan Pepper 01:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you're right. If i didnt ask, i bet someone else would have. dposse 02:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: but this article fucked everything up for me and spoiled the book. Superior1 20:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry 

message: I've redesigned it so that it gives the option of going to the Teabing article. That way, it doesn't spoil it for anyone before they've read it ;). Will2710 14:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redesign

message: Um, if you don't want to spoil it for yourself, don't read the article. I'm fixing it. L2K 23:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um.... 

message: To avoid spoilers, I have created a new page called The Teacher (redirect page). Before, when holding the mouse over the 'click here' link, the Teabing link could be seen in the link/security bar coming up as wikipedia.org/Leigh_Teabing or whatever. In this one, a redirect page takes you to the Teabing article, and when reading this article, if one hovers the mouse over the 'click here' link, all you can see is wikipedia.org/The Teacher (redirect). I think this is the right answer as it forces people to click on the link to find out, rather than inadvertently hover the mouse button over the 'click here' and accidentally finding out. (Dsims209 20:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has overridden me already! (Dsims209 20:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect addition 

message: This whole is very unprofessional and silly.  If someone clicks on the "Teacher" link it's because he wants to know about The Teacher.  To treat our readers like children is extremely insulting and makes us look like a stupid fan site. --Tony Sidaway 22:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree entirely. It is quite possible that someone who had not read all of the book might want to read the article for details of the Teacher's activities. Granted, the article does not contain that, but I will get round to expanding it so as it does. This way, at least the reader has the choice whether or not to consciously discover the identity. How much effort does it take to click on one extra link to get to the page where you find that out? As much as I hate edit warring, I will continue to revert this, and I'm not above requesting official intervention if it continues. If the result is that the redirect stays, so be it. But I will not have the opinions of one person ruining it for the many unless Wikipedia officially designates that this is to be the case. I am acting in the interests of the majority here, not recklessly spoiling the book just because I consider it 'silly'. --Will2710|Talk! 23:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprofessional

message: I have nominated this redirect for deletion. The discussion is here. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFD