lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1969 Chicago Cubs season

message: Some people also attribute the Cubs late season demise to the fact that Leo "The Lip" Durocher left the team in August to get married. Hogwash. I've talked to players Jenkins, Santo and Banks, who each categorically deny that played any role in their finish that year. I knew the guys - I was a Spring Training batboy for the Cubs in Scottsdale, AZ, that year, and had the chance to speak with each of them a few times over the years. 24.56.179.27 (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  00:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Under the "Bad luck" heading, there is something missing at the very beginning. The first sentence of the section reads, "Banks stated, however, that after an error by Young, Santo "went crazy. Young was so upset, he ran out ... I had never seen something so hurtful". What is this sentence referring to? Some kind of controversy? An example of bad luck that had happened? Something needs to be added before that sentence to establish context.  Yesthatbruce (talk) 03:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing material
Talk:D.A.V.E.

message: Do the links to the chat bots have any relationship to this article at all?  I looked at them, they didn't seem to contribute anything meaningful. 24.150.125.164 (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chat bots really needed? 

message: I redirected all of the alternate spellings for D.A.V.E. to here. No need to have a listing with the various WikiProjects for each one. Fortdj33 (talk) 12:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple redirects
Talk:Chase Meridian

message: How can her infobox say her publisher is "DC Comics" if she only exists in the film? DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:37, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. If she only has appeared in the film, not in the comics, then we should probably use a different infobox. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 22:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only in the film? 

message: Hi everybody, do you support me merging this article to List of Batman supporting characters#Film, with this entry: 
*Dr. Chase Meridian (Nicole Kidman): Appears only in Batman Forever as the female lead. Kidman described the character as a "criminal psychologist who dresses like Jessica Rabbit." Robin Wright turned down the role while Jeanne Tripplehorn and Linda Hamilton were also both considered. Chase is a psychiatrist working with the Gotham City police and falls in love with both Batman and Bruce Wayne. She assists Bruce in analyzing a series of befuddling threats sent to him by the Riddler and also witnesses the death of Robin's parents. Later she learns Bruce is Batman and is kidnapped by the Riddler and Two-Face in a trap designed to make Batman choose between her and Robin. Batman saves them both and Chase promises to keep his identity secret.
Ryan4314  (talk) 19:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *Sort of. :)  From what I can tell, Steve's thinking parallels mine for Batman Forever being the parent article.  It was not what Ryan proposed, though... if he's okay with merging to the film article, too, then I'd support the motion.  Just making that clear for all. —Erik (talk • contrib) 00:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see anything that could be merged. A part from the plot from this page (which is really just details from the film's plot), the casting stuff is already at Batman Forever#Production. So, if you think it would be better in the "Cast" section, it's really a matter of rearranging that article. :D   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 00:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Everyone has been notified, it does not matter when they were notified (see your DEADLINE link). You are simply trying to oppose this merge via other means, i.e. proposing it be stopped at ANI. Ryan4314  (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: So, the article gets deleted anyway, but the history is saved, thus its called a merge.  No information will be copied over to the other location of course, it just having the one brief mention it already had before.  No way possible to copy any reasonable amount of information over, and make it fit on that page properly.  Did all of you who voted Merge, realize this would happen?  Are you happy with the end result, or should we undelete/unmerge it?  Shouldn't this have just gone back to the AFD if enough people wanted it dead?  Dream Focus 00:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It survived AFD but then got deleted anyway
Talk:László

message: For some reason, this page states 'John Loder' played V. Lazlo in Casablanca, which is clearly false.  Changed it to Paul Henreid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.181.235.93 (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

message: I thought Lazlo is just a frequent misspelling of the name. Any references? --K0zka (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lazlo" 

message: Laszlo on homo nimi 2001:14BB:69B:B803:14BB:782:865:9EAC (talk) 14:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laszlo on homo
Talk:Mike Doyle (24 character)

message: I removed the category "Fictional agnostics". Categories are supposed to be placed only where they are defining attributes; see WP:CAT.  It is not clear from the show that he was an agnostic. The material previously cited (and removed because it was WP:PLOT) talked about him reading a variety of religious texts; that alone is not sufficient to deem someone an "agnostic" (and even if it were it's not a "defining" characteristic of the character). --Lquilter (talk) 15:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  category: fictional agnostics
Talk:Scottsburg, Oregon

message: http://www.oregoncities.us/scottsburg/index.htm This site copies Oregon Geographic Names, so if you want to add this info to the article I can double check the facts and properly cite it later. Katr67 17:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I take it back, they usually copy OGN, but this is lifted from the chamber of commerce. Katr67 17:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy of OGN for cite
Talk:SUNY Plaza

message: Does anyone know if this page is linked to the page for Albany, NY?
:Not sure what that question was about.  I guess it was to suggest that this building should be mentioned in the Albany, New York article, which perhaps it should. doncram (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: a question

message: There's a bunch more to add to the article from the NRHP document for the site. and Accompanying one photo, exterior, undated
doncram (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: source for more development of article

message: Currently this is in the article= According to the NRHP documents about the site, "Throughout the years, the Delaware and Hudson Railroad Company Building, because of its large scale, strategic location and irreplaceable detail, has often been mistaken for the New York State Capitol." Ok, I'm sure the NRHP documents does state that, but where do the people who wrote it get that info? What is THEIR source? Does anyone other than me see a problem with having a statement like that in the article? Does anyone really mistake it for the Capitol because its "large scale, strategic location and irreplaceable detail"? If so then why dont they turn 180 degrees around and see that a LARGER scale building, in a MORE strategic location, and also with irreplaceable detail is at the OTHER end of lower State Street and realize, oh, THAT building is more impressive maybe THAT is the Capitol, oh yea, there's a giant sign that says it is! Both buildings do not look like the classic American thought of a "capitol" building (no dome), but come on, the NYS Capitol isnt exactly kept in the dark and never promoted, whereas the D&H building really isnt promoted, even by the city itself. If I'm the only one who sees a problem with this statement then ok leave it, but speak up if you think this type of statement is not something Wikipedia should have.Camelbinky (talk) 02:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone else see a problem?
Talk:Choice overload

message: I rewrote this to reflect what I have read about the subject.  It seemed like the previous version was stating the exact opposite of what I thought it meant.  I am by no means an expert and would prefer is someone else came along and expanded upon this article. Kingmundi 17:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I suggest merging the article overchoice into the article choice overload.
As far as I can tell, both names are synonyms for the same phenomena, or at least similar enough that one article could cover both of them with a sentence or two clarifying the difference.
--68.0.124.33 (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the reverse merge, particularly as choice overload is unreferenced, and overload is well referenced. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  04:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I suggest merging the content of Choice Overload with that of Overchoice.  I feel that the term "overchoice" more effectively conveys the social psychological theory.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.75.148.99 (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the reverse merge, particularly as choice overload is unreferenced, and overload is well referenced. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  04:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse Merge
Talk:The Dukes (British band)

message: This article was, shall we say, superceded by later edits about an entirely different band. Not that they were the shakes from a notability standpoint, but we can't have articles changed this way. The second band makes no claim to significance, and I will problaby delete the edits about it in the near future.   Dlohcierekim  15:52, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion decline. two subjects in one article
Talk:Electricity sector in Mexico

message: This article is pretty outdated. Not just on the data being from sometime around late 2009; the state-owned Luz y Fuerza del Centro company was liquidated back in October 2009! 189.230.41.47 (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: Please can someone clarify in the tariff section if the quoted numbers are the subsidised values or the pre-subsidy tariff. 128.232.238.118 (talk) 10:46, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They are the pre-subsidy tariffs, as stated at the beginning of the tariff section which says that (residential and agricultural) electricity tariffs are below costs.--Mschiffler (talk) 11:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tariff
Talk:Court of Aldermen

message: This page needs to be expanded.  It needs to show how the court is elected (i.e. is it elected from the members of the common council, or elected seperate of the common council), and what its current responsibilites/competencies are instead of putting "their role has changed". --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions
Talk:Victor Drazen

message: The article should be merged character on in season one, may have been portrayed by a known celebrity. The character is deceased and not talked about after season one The notability if there is any is not asserted. Merge --Lucy-marie 17:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would give my support to this suggestion. asyndeton talk 00:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, but being the 'big villain' of a season does not immediately establish notability. asyndeton talk 00:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Further, the assassination attempt on him prior to the start of the show did result in Stephen Saunders desicion to "clean up America."  24.24.90.148 02:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Coyotes in popular culture

message: This page was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coyotes in popular culture.  The result of the discussion was Keep. Bearian 17:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD result 

message: A man called Coyote is a central figure in the Mars Trilogy by Kim Stanley Robinson. I  think his role is similar to that of a trickster.
80.101.76.238 (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 2010 

message: This article is littered with examples of Coyotes in popular culture that lack any secondary sources to establish that they are significant. I've tagged the article accordingly and will give it a couple of months before I begin removing any examples that lack sources. Interested users should review WP:LSC. Doniago (talk) 02:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PopCruft will be trimmed 
Talk:List of Chevrolet pickup trucks

message: The Ford Page assumes that the different model numbers/names can be covered in one article, so the Ford F Series goes from start to finish of the Ford Pickup. 
It would be nice to have a similar treatment for Chevy, in my opinion rather than just a redirect link.  It could be called "Chevy and GM Light Duty Trucks". 
*****************  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.194.111 (talk) 20:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2005 UCI Europe Tour

message: I'm not sure if the name of this article should be 2005 UCI Europe Tour or 2004-2005 UCI Europe Tour. According to Murilo Fischer article it should be the second one, but in UCI website they refer to it as 2005 UCI Europe Tour. No race of this edition took place in 2004, so I'm leaving it as 2005 UCI Europe Tour.Drunt 18:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this article
Talk:SMART Multicast

message: It's been 10 years that the IETF has been working to achieve the goal of a secure reliable IP Multicast. The article speaks to a proposal at the November 2006 MBONED IEFF working group.  Seperate proposals for secure IP Multicast and reliable IP Multicast have been made, however no other proposed protocols are both reliable and secure. 
TODO: Cover other proposed secure/reliable multicast protocols as they appear. 
--Hulkeypoo 18:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experimental routing protocols
Talk:St. Joseph's School, Trichy

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:St. Joseph's College, Bangalore

message: Change name from St Joseph's College to university 115.99.168.35 (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  name change
Talk:Leopoldo Franchetti

message: This is a very poor article. It does not give any background, a candidate for speedy deletion - Mafia Expert 18:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Very poor article
Talk:Damien Done

message: I'm restoring the redirect for this page. This page says a heck of a lot, except that it says nothing about whether they sold any records or made it on any charts. In its current state, it doesn't really say why this band is significant. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring redirect
Talk:When the Lady Smiles

message: The bold video may have hurt the sales of the single across the pond.
*Please clarify: which pond, from wich vantage point?  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 18:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bold video may have hurt the sales of the single across the pond. 

message: The article describes the song as being a hity in the United States, but the table at the bottom sys it reached #76 on the charts.  Is 76 really a "hit?" -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 10:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A hit
Talk:Ho Yuen Hoe

message: Does anyone have the Chinese characters for Ho Yuen Hoe?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.134.125 (talk) 07:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oregon Health Plan

message: Needs WP:LEAD work and some expansion of the sub-sections to get to B class. Aboutmovies (talk) 12:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The state or Oregon offering to poison its citizens through its health care plan is obviously noteworthy. This should be included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ted8625 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ted, please note that I added a new section to the article here to include the Barbara Wagner chemotherapy denial controversy that you brought up, so your addition was not in vain.  I added more citations to prove the Wagner story is both true and notable, and did my best to use copious sourcing and NPOV so the new text is unlikely to be challenged or removed.  Thank you for bringing the story to my attention, and please keep contributing.  NickDupree (talk) 18:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the work Nick. Nick and Ted, the info was not removed because it was not true or notable, but because the way it was stated showed a slight POV and the sentence, "The Oregon Health Plan sent a letter to senior citizen Barbara Wagener saying that it would not cover the cost of the lung cancer drugs her doctor prescribed, but that it would pay for her doctor-assisted suicide," doesn't give enough information for the reader. Ted, you obviously feel strongly about this issue, but we have to state the facts as cited in reliable neutral sources, and let the reader draw his or her own conclusions. I think you will find those of us who watch this article acting in good faith, while at the same time, doing our best to up hold Wikipedia policy and guidelines. We don't have any desire to censor, challenge or remove controversial material merely because it is controversial. Cheers! Katr67 (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed Kat.  The problem with Ted's original edit wasn't the controversial topic, or disagreement from editors, it was that Ted didn't include the multiple sources required by Wikipedia's notability inclusion criteria.  His one source from Catholic News Agency wasn't enough to back it up.  But because the Wagner story is becoming so prominent in the health care debate, I believe it important to include.  So, in my edit, I did my best to vigorously source every claim, even linking to Oregon Health Plan policies to substantiate the central claim that they will only cover comfort measures and assisted suicide for some terminal patients.  I also included Ted's original Catholic News Agency source, to preserve his contribution.  NickDupree (talk) 21:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, glad we're all on the same page here, so to speak. P.S. It's "Katr" (rhymes with "Cater"), not "Kat", which irritates me for some reason. Keep up the good work. Katr67 (talk) 21:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Oregon Health Plan Suggesting Assisted Suicide
Talk:Godfrey Howitt

message: Seems to be mostly referenced to [stuff]. I assume that is an oversight? Andplus 14:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The article identifies Howitt as an etymologist, but later refers to his work in entomology.  The former is words, the latter is bugs.  Which was he?  (I'm guessing from the context that he was an entomologist, not an etymologist, but it's possible that he was interested in both the roots of plants and the roots of words.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 01:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymologist or entomologist?
Talk:Kate Mann

message: This article really needs to have some better sources in order to establish Mann's notability. Links to the artist's own webpage and MySpace can be used to establish certain facts, but reliable, non-trivial, third-party sources are needed as well for notability purposes. The WonkaVision article/review isn't too bad, but more writeups would be good, in regional or national publications. Has there been a story in The Oregonian, The Mercury, No Depression, Rolling Stone? Please read up at WP:BAND for more info on establishing the notability of musicians. I wouldn't nominate this article for deletion, but as it stands now, I could see somebody else doing so. Katr67 (talk) 18:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources and notability 
Talk:Diving equipment

message: Can someone who dives please explain what an "octopus retainer" is and what it is used for?
65.78.188.53 (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: it is a device to hold an "Octopus demand valve" in place. An Octopus demand valve is a second demand valve connected to the primary regulator to supply emergency breathing gas to another diver. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:22, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Octopus retainer

message: I have removed the 'improve' and cleanup tags after a fairly extensive cleanup.
The article still has very few inline references, but as almost all of the entries are linked to main articles or sections in other articles where they are usually adequately referenced, I consider this unneccessary. Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of tags

message: Honestly, no octopus? I know it's somewhat redundant for identification purposes, but it is standard equipment and needs to be demonstrated to be so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.131.47 (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Standard equipment for some modes of diving. I have added several new pictures, including some mention of octopus regs and a link to a section in the article on diving regulators. If you have a good photo which illustrates it better than what we have, you are welcome to upload to commons and link it from here. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 12:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture at bottom of article could be improved
Talk:Chalfont St Peter

message: Please see the following three reverts, and Talk:Jordans, the Osbournes do not and have never lived in Chalfont St Peter, their house is within the confines of the nearby village of Jordans.
*Revert by Roleplayer
*Revert by Roleplayer
*Revert by 64.103.104.124
-- Roleplayer 18:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Osbournes 

message: Being 15 miles away from somewhere isn't being close.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:5994:A600:DD24:F7F3:4D52:2DC8 (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: close [sic] proximity