Talk:Cabo de Gata-Níjar Natural Park

message: As per the official Spanish Marine Reservations website, the marine tract of the reservation covers 4,613 has. (see external link), not 12,000 as stated. However, it may have been enlarged and the info on that page become outdated.
Mountolive 03:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake: I rechecked and, actually 4,613 has. are protected as a marine-only reserve, while some 8,000 are protected as the marine tract of the Natural Park itself (which is both terrestrial and marine). In other words, there is a total of 12,000 has of marine protected area, under two different concepts but this is the correct figure anyway. Mountolive 05:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Marine total area

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cabo de Gata-Níjar Natural Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130409081737/http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-list/main/ramsar/1-31-218_4000_0__ to http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-list/main/ramsar/1-31-218_4000_0__
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cabo de Gata-Níjar Natural Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090530220441/http://www.europeangeoparks.org/isite/page/124%2C1%2C0.asp to http://www.europeangeoparks.org/isite/page/124%2C1%2C0.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is an unfinished hotel in the town of Playa del Algarrobico, which has been under construction since 2003.2602:30A:C0FF:A6E0:3D9C:BE03:F47B:CBCD (talk) 16:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  An unfinished hotel 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cabo de Gata-Níjar Natural Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120910175314/http://cabodegataphotography.com/en/cabo-de-gata.html to http://cabodegataphotography.com/en/cabo-de-gata.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510060148/http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_34573.shtml to http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_34573.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: google translate can be wrestled with the help of line breaks to yield that cabo means cape (not outside) and that gata/gato mean cat,
but the google ai seems pretty determined to supply results for niger rather than Níjar.
This page makes it clear that the town and park take their name for the word for carpenter in Arabic.
Longpinkytoes (talk) 10:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that etymology also belongs at the Níjar article. Incidentally there is a mention of Nijar here, which might also be usefully added. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology 

message: Can I remove the advertisement template? I think the article is good. Cleter (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article seems fine to me