lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Epsilon Crucis

message: Wouldn't a K class star br an orange dwarf? Cheers, :) MikeReichold  15:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  orange giant? 

message: "juxta Crucem" is appearently in a lyric from the hymn Stabat Mater. But it is not connected with this star.  See Stabat Mater#Text and translation.--Bay Flam 14:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted "[[Wikipedia:No original research|original reserch]]" by [[User:Richontaban|Richontaban]]. 

message: With a parallax of 14.3 mas shouldn't the distance be 227.97 ly?
Ian Christie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianchristie (talk • contribs) 02:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance ? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ginan (star) →  – The name "Ginan" has not come into widespread use for this star.  There are hits at web pages based on Wikipedia and some other popular sites, a few hits in books, mostly related to history and indigenous astronomy, almost none in scientific publications.  The article was renamed from the title Epsilon Crucis in 2018.  See also the previous group requested move on this page and Requested move 16 October 2021 for related discussions about the preferred titles for the main stars of Crux. Lithopsian (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Astronomy has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Support - I don't see this name commonly used as much as other star names like Rasalhague, Antares etc. As a response seen from Talk:Alpha Ophiuchi, I'm guessing Epsilon Crucis is used more in sources and people may think this is a more understandable name as to where that star is located. I was also thinking "Rasalhague" would be the article title of Alpha Ophiuchi myself but others don't think that is a well known star compared to others that we see. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 April 2022
Talk:Battle of Hill Eerie

message: This article was very poorly written and I'm not totally convinced that all my edits are kosher. What makes me say this is that re-reading the article a few times throws up some interesting points, eg '19th Philipine Battalion Combat Team' and '179th United States Infantry {both red links) and in the last (June 1952) section, the article has a battalion being relieved by a division ! I'm no tactical expert, but that sounds incredibly generous. RASAM (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:FMEP (EP)

message: It would be good to have a list of performers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dk pdx (talk • contribs) 10:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel
Template talk:Orphan

message: The copy-paste field where it suggests the syntax one can insert into the article still reads "Orphan|date=December 2019", whereas for example Template:Unreferenced correctly shows the month/year as "Unreferenced|date=January 2020". Not sure what's wrong with the code. --DB1729 (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing is wrong with the code. Try a WP:PURGE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's fine now, showing the correct month/year, without me having done anything. Thanks. --DB1729 (talk) 00:19, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date didn't update 

message: Hi, In my wonderings at Commons, I found this icon.
Can this one be used instead of the "puzzle W" out there now? I think it's more visually descriptive of the de-orphan process. Discussion please. JoeNMLC (talk) 16:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: - JoeNMLC (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I think the puzzle is pretty descriptive and is less ambiguous than the icon you've found. ~Kvng (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

text: This talk page is not watched by a lot of editors. If you want to pursue this, I'd suggest posting something at Wikipedia talk:Orphan or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orphanage. ~Kvng (talk) 15:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this icon?   A loose necktie (talk) 11:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  That icon might fit in better with Wikipedia:WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement.  GoingBatty (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan icon 

message: Please replace [ link to it] with [ link to it]. The official capitalization of that special page is Special:WhatLinksHere. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 13 October 2022 

message: Need to edit this template, because this template can't add any categories. So I suggest to following code for add to template:
Category:Orphan articles
 Laziz Baxtiyorov (talk) 05:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: As things stand, the article is always placed into  plus one other category. The name of that second category depends upon two parameters: if  is set (to a month and year), e.g. , the article is categorised into  (or similar); otherwise if  is set (to a month and year), e.g. , the article is categorised into  (or similar); if neither of these is set, the article is categorised into  and a bot will add a valid  within a few hours. So there's nothing to do here. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 14 May 2023 

message: Sometimes when tagged it doesn’t show up. I am very concerned. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't give any examples, those are essential if we are to check this out. But please also read Template:Orphan#Visibility, that might answer your question. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The template itself
Talk:Riverview High School (New Brunswick)

message: The district's school profile https://secure1.nbed.nb.ca/sites/ASD-E/schools/rhsroyals/Pages/School-Profile.aspx lists Wilson, Gary as principal, but the message from the principal on the school's page https://secure1.nbed.nb.ca/sites/ASD-E/schools/rhsroyals/Pages/Message-from-the-Principal.aspx is from Jason Reath. Meters (talk) 03:32, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  principal
Talk:Fore Abbey

message: Please propose alternatives upon which to expand and detail! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter gavigan (talk • contribs) 
:Done some wikification. The Ogre 18:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Might split this into an article about the village and separate articles about the Abbey, Church etc. Any objections? (Sarah777 11:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting
Talk:Kennebecasis Valley High School

message: There are more than 1000 students at this school.TostitosAreGross 00:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enrollment 

message: Althought KVHS might be 47-0 in the past year, they did lose the final of the Reach For Dalhousie tournament to Auburn Drive High School from Nova Scotia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.194.227 (talk) 10:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefeated? 

message: The Reach for Dalhousie event has a completely different format than Reach for the Top.  There is no buzzing involved at all.  Teams have time to discuss and come up with a common answer.
It is correct to say that KVHS was undefeated in Reach for the Top play at the time of that post. 156.34.192.206 (talk) 04:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefeated? 

message: particularly the Reach for the Top acheivements. I'm thinking of making a table graph of some sort once I learn how to do so, but if anybody comes across this and would like to help on that it would be greatly appreciated. I might ask for help sometime in the future anyways if I can't seem to get the hang of things. B3251 (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidy up the academic achievements section & make it look nicer 

message: I removed the following unsourced content:
* Between April 2004 and November 2011, the KVHS Reach for the Top team won 273 consecutive games (40 consecutive tournaments) in New Brunswick. This is considered to be the longest streak ever in any province.
* In April 2015, the KVHS Reach for the Top team won the UTS University of Toronto Schools championship among many other teams competing in a close competition.
if anybody finds sources for them in the future, feel free to add them back. B3251 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing unsourced content 

message: I just wanted to add a talk page comment to let anybody stumbling across here know that I will be writing a history section to this article by using archived newspaper headlines on the Telegraph-Journal’s archive database (https://da.tj.news). It is locked behind a paywall, so if anybody needs me to show what I’ll source, I can provide text or screenshots if needed. B3251 (talk) 11:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Colonnades Leisure Park#Requested move 17 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 15:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Colonnades Leisure Park#Requested move 17 February 2024]] 

message: Cannons (house) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Cannons (house)]] 

message: Would anyone be able to expand the Sadiq Khan section under 'Initiatives' on the Mayor of London (top-importance) article. At the moment it is short and comes across as biased (see talk page discussion). Thanks Anguswiki (talk) 16:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sadiq Khan initiatives 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allan Chappelow#Requested move 7 May 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Allan Chappelow#Requested move 7 May 2024]] 

message: I tried to link to London Guilds (or even London guilds) from another article and was surprised to find that no such article exists. Anyone fancy writing it? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be reasonable to redirect that name to Livery company? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds very sensible to me. Paul W (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . If anybody objects, you know what to do. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Guilds
Talk:Sony BDP-S1

message: Why would someone buy this instead of a PS3? It's $500 more, and it does less. Kyouteki 15:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This player has multi-channel analogue audio outputs, while the PS3 does not. Also, the PS3 has some problems relating to scaling images down to 720p or 1080i, which have not yet been fixed through firmware. Nick 8 05:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I purchased this player back in late 2006 for 1,000 dollars, the main reason being that the PS3 was out of stock at many retailers at the time, due to high demand. But yes, if I had the option to buy a PS3 at the time, I would've picked the PS3. Illegitimate Barrister 04:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: Although this article may not be completely unbiased, it certianly does not read like an advertisment. As it clearly states features of the product that may be less desirable when considering a blue-ray player. --Guyonphone 23:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I agree that it's not like an advertisement, the article simply doesn't read like other articles found in an encyclopedia. It sounds kind of like a buying guide. (Myscrnnm 13:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads Like an Advertisment?

message: I think that this article is in need of a rewrite or major re-organisation. It should have a list of specifications instead of the "advertisement" explanation of features, and it needs to be more like an encyclopedia article. However, it does contain some good information on the player and how it differs from others, but the presentation is bad. Nick 8 (talk) 03:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite needed

message: *145 articles
*7 books
*2 scholars
Ikip (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Saint John High School

message: In the IB section it says a citation is needed for students who claimed it helped ease the transition to university. The students testimonials can be found here: http://www.sjhigh.ca/academic/ib/index.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.233.103 (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Needed
Talk:Treyarch

message: For the games made of in production it says call of duty 4 there is no fact to this and mostly all rumours even though i will not add the,mm say infinity ward will develop it.
I am removing the information about Treyarch now being the sole CoD developer, and the information regarding Infinity Ward being disbanded, due to contradictions given on the page for Infinity Ward.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.198.28 (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why was my information on bad PC ports removed? Many PC gamers complained about the lack of quality put into the port. I request it not be taken out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varthon (talk • contribs) 03:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was taken out because it was not referenced to a reliable source.  Negative or critical information must be well sourced to remain in an article.--Kubigula (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC
Talk:St. Malachy's Memorial High School

message: Stop spaming the page please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.81.226.191 (talk) 15:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The picture in this article is a picture of Saint John High School, not Saint Malachy's High School. Jamk9 (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Image
Talk:Steven Ford

message: 69.152.32.232 15:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :No, according to IMDB, Steven is the actor. There are a few minor actors named Jack Ford, as well as a news correspondent, but they're unrelated. Fan-1967 15:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there a picture of Michael Ford on Steve Ford's page??? Dbart 18:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Some people have stated that he is homosexual; NNDB states his orientation as 'matter of dispute'. This article doesn't mention his orientation, nor any personal relationships. Does anyone know the truth of the matter? Werdnawerdna (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT?

message: F. hosted a TV series about the USSS.
It should be mentioned in the article. --37.24.8.17 (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television Host
Talk:Must Have Done Something Right

message: I have a question about the lyrics. The first line of the pre-chorus i have been wondering about.
Is the line "I can not wait for a new improved way..."
or
"Im racking my brain for a new improved way..."
I'm a big Relient K fan so if anybody knows please let me know.
Thanks. 70.246.229.222 19:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics confusion? 

message: Does anyone have a name for the girl in the video? Cowplopmorris 11:02, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girl in video 
Talk:Synagogue of Santa María la Blanca

message: The photo of Iglesia de Sta Maria la Blanca is not of the Santa Maria la Blanca's synagogue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.128.20.23 (talk) 11:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed!. I remove it.--Garcilaso (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why is "infobox religious building" used and not "infobox museum"? It's now a museum, not a Synagogue איתן קרסנטי (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The choice of infobox may not be vital either way, but the building was designed and, for most of its history, used as a religious building, and accordingly its interest to readers today is as a former synagogue (it's officially a museum, but the only thing to see is the building itself). So the current infobox is appropriate for practical purposes, as it contains most of the information parameters we need and fits with the main topic. The museum infobox has a different and more limited set of parameters, which I don't think would benefit us here. R Prazeres (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong infobox
Talk:Palace of Charles V

message: Clearly Carlos chose not to finish it. In fact, he didn't live in Granada any more. Ferdinand and Isabella are buried in Granada, but no one after. Carlos changed that.
The palace was not finished because Carlos lost interest in it. Otherwise he would have had it completed.
There was contemporary criticism of the palace, for which the main entrance to the Alhambra was obliterated. I don't know how much sympathy there would be in sixteenth-century Christian Europe for a Muslim palace in a completely foreign style. Münzer was taken by it, in the report of his 1494 trip. Washington Irving had no problem redoing a few rooms in New England style. He didn't need to get permission, no one cared. But he didn't show any respect for the Alhambra as Moorish art.
Anachronical and unfair it may be, but there was contemporary criticism of Carlos V's palace and that is related to the fact that it was never finished. When I find the refs. I'll put it in, but meanwhile I thought it should be mentioned here. You can't just ignore it. deisenbe (talk) 11:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the palace was never finished
Talk:Northop

message: Just a note to say I've removed all the personal memoirs from the page - Wikipedia should be an encyclopaedic account of the village and as such contain factual information on a non-personal basis. Am sure there's a better way of phrasing that sentence, but hopefully it conveys the right idea :) Richsage 15:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Toledo Cathedral

message: Is there any citation for this Cathedral being "modeled" after the Bourges Cathedral, as the article states?  I think the floor plan of the nave may have been modeled after it, but Gothic or not, some of the features of the two couldn't be more different (i.e. No Flying Buttresses in Toledo, I think).  If it's just the floor plan of the nave, maybe it should be clarified. Rafajs77 (talk) 00:46, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation for Bourges Cathedral reference

message: It slays me how all across Wikipedia projects, you see editors add snarky commentary about their pet peeve to their edit summaries, almost never acknowledging the work already done or showing any appreciation for it, but only expressing dissatisfaction that the article is not already in a perfect state. Sheesh. Carlstak (talk) 02:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snarky comments in an article's edit summaries 

message: Would "primatial" be better?  if it is a primatial see, then should that be included somehow with the words "metropolitan" and "archdiocese"?  And is it the seat of the Archdiocese or of the Archbishop? (esp. since the article about the Archdiocese is only a list of Archbishops?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 14:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primate, See
Talk:Midland Highway (Tasmania)

message: *Located at User:Chuq/Sandbox/Midland
*Based on 
*More discussion about the diagram format (rather than the Midland Highway diagram) is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways#Road diagram icons
-- Chuq (talk) 08:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highway strip diagram

message: The Southern Outlet could do with more information on
* Corresponding the milestone names to their current names which can be found on a map.
* What the Bass Highway did before the building of the Southern Outlet
* What the Bass Highway did before the building of the Prospect Bypass
Jordf32123 (talk) 09:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Outlet
Talk:The Man in the Black Suit

message: The man in the black suit could possibly be shortenned to the man in black, thus making a dark tower reference
Well...a clear Dark Tower reference is made when the title character first meets the protaganist. He asks if they are "well met", a greeting used throughout the Dark Tower series. 69.255.110.29 (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Love Is a Mix Tape

message: The description of the book has been used with permission of the publisher, Crown Publishing, a division of Random House. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawns (talk • contribs) 15:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, it's not really a description, it's an ad. Certainly it's not an encyclopedic article. Fan-1967 15:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: Dunno if anyone else will want to expand the article at some point, but here's a good review by The Denver Post. Might make the beginnings of an excellent "Critical reaction" section. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review to be used
Talk:Vigna caracalla

message: Based on Internet searches, there seems to be confusion about whether the flowers of Vigna caracalla are fragrant, and whether it is the same as Phaseolus carcacalla.  When this article is cleaned up with sources, it would be good to address these questions.
::Coleopterous 15:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: First I would like to point out that the picture of the flower is phaseolus caracalla as can be seen here http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/53274/ as opposed to vigna caracalla which can be seen here http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/1884/ Also, if snail vine or snail bean are searched they are re-directed here. That said perhaps it would be of note to mention that vigna caracalla is grown in Monticello gardens and was mentioned in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Hawkins. 
Theantishred2 (talk) 08:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monticello 

message: According to the USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network, http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?41604, <I>Phaseolus caracalla</i> is a synonym of <I>Vigna c</i>. Though cultivated variations may have separated them and different common names given to them, they are still the same plant. CooleyBufo (talk) 21:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Synonym