lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ruhr University Bochum

message: Dear sir, I'm a bba student in  eastern university bangladesh. I would like to admited to your university for my mba.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.38.33 (talk) 17:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admited to new section 

message: Where does the English name come from. I don't find it on the official website. If English, it should be consistent. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:University of Bamberg

message: I was going to clean up the grammar but I wasn't sure I correctly understood what I was reading.  The Academia Bambergensis was enlarged into the University of Bamberg and then when most of the departments were closed it was renamed the College for Philosphy and Theology?  The third paragraph seemed to say that some part of the school was still going, but the fourth seemed to say that a school founded in 1923 and a school founded in 1958 became the current University of Bamberg, which would invalidate a 1647 original creation date.  Anyway, I did a Google search and found a page that has the same text and no Wikipedia attribution tag, so I'm tagging this article as a copyvio. Banaticus (talk) 07:29, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this up for investigation! This one seems to be a reverse copy, but it's always good to evaluate carefully when we find copying. The template above explains my rationale. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio? 

message: G'day, I'm proposing the newly created Johann Baptist von Spix Professorship article be merged into this article as this is the "parent" article and is shorter in length already. The professorship doesn't at this point seem to have enough information to warrant it's own article.  —  IVORK Discuss 04:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Un-opposed for three months, looks like a no brainer. Fyddlestix (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:University of Augsburg

message: The article currently reads like a holiday brochure for the University of Augsburg...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.225.99.72 (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite needed
Talk:Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences

message: The text about the uni being "internationally well known" for its achievments in engineering is obviously copied from the article about Darmstadt University of Technology.
I suggest to rephrase this at least. Additionally, I personally have my doubts about the international reputation of this uni in the world. I vote for the removal of that sentence.
:I study computer science at the h_da and I don't think that that it is well known for "thoutstanding achievements in the areas of engineering and computer science". "Also, the selection criteria for this university are the toughest among the universities of applied sciences in Germany" When I started to study there were no selection criteria and I don't think that there are any now (beside those required by the law).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.153.229.105 (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also assume those rankings refer to the TU, but it's not even possible to verify this because no source is given. That's why why I'm going to delete those sections, and will add a template in hope someone can reassess these statements on the grounds of a possible confusion with the TU. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 09:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  reputation of h_da 
Talk:Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt

message: I tried to improve the English in the article, fixed a few outdated things, and moved the library affair to a separate paragraph. It is not a central part of the history of this university. I also removed an unaccessible reference to an article in FAZ. I weakened some overly excessive praises of the BA/MA system, but left other personal opinions of the previous author intact, especially the idea that BA students have "more time" to be abroad, and that this is a "popular choice". --Mga010 (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:University of Giessen

message: Rutherford studied in Giessen?
I think this is in need of a citation. It seems he received an honorary doctorate from Giessen, but I can't find any evidence of him having studied there (77.103.194.148 (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :University of Lahn. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 3#University of Lahn until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "University of Lahn" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Protestant University for Applied Sciences Freiburg

message: Evangelische Fachhochschule  Freiburg im Breisgau	Evangelische Fachhochschule  Freiburg im Breisgau
Daten                                            	Daten
founded in:                                      	1918
kind of University:                              	konfessionelle Hochschule
responsible body:                                	Protestant regional church of Baden
faculties:                                       	
*Sozialarbeit/Sozialpädagogik
*Religionspädagogik
*Management, Education  and organisation
professors:                                      	24 (WS 05/06)
assistant lecturer:                              	103 (WS 05/06)
students:                                        	ca. 620 (grundständig) ca. 80 in Master-Studiengängen
number of students  from other countries:        	8%
contingent of men:                               	ca. 25%
budget:                                          	ca. ??? €
chancellor:                                      	Christoph Schneider-Harpprecht
address:                                         	Bugginger Strasse 38 D-79114 FreiburgTelephone: +49 761 47812-0Fax: +49 761 47812-30E-Mail: webmaster@efh-freiburg.de
Homepage                                         	http://www.efh-freiburg.de
picture                                          	picture
colspan="2" align=center                         	-
and the notes deleted, see interwiki German Sebastian scha. (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From page copied
Talk:Goethe University Frankfurt

message: Frankfurt University has modified the university logo -- see German entry for the university.--141.2.95.34 (talk) 13:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: logo

message: Do you think Gadamer was part of the Frankfurt school?--Radh (talk) 19:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gadamer? 

message: The article was recently moved from "Goethe University Frankfurt" to "Goethe University of Frankfurt." However, the university itself still uses "Goethe University Frankfurt" on its English website, and "Goethe University Frankfurt" also appears to be more widely used by English sources in general. --Thkafra (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: I was wondering if someone could edit and/or remove the HoF logo at the bottom of the infobox? The Frankfurt University is my Alma Mater, and as such I can tell you that the House of Finance is just one building at the Campus Westend and not representative of the entire Univeristy. I would do it myself, if I knew how to edit the infobox.
: Done --Courier New (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bottom logo in the infobox
Talk:Canadian National Police Service

message: Would the CNP be the only truly international police force? Can't think of any other. knoodelhed (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am confused, CNP is not an international police force... --Cahk (talk) 06:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: The way I read the article too, the CN Police would appear to be an, and as far as I am aware the only, international law enforcement agency which does have intrusive powers in more than country.  This would make it the only international police agency, as distinct from international law enforcement agencies generally which only liaise and exchange information between countries.  If not, the article is misleading. Peet Ern (talk) 05:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not. Equinox137 (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniqueness 

message: The list of detachments / offices, etc. should be moved in to the infobox, but it is not clear if these are 'offices', bigger places, or  'stations' (not railway stations but as in police stations) smaller places. Peet Ern (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of detachments etc into infbox. 

message: The article says there are six divisions in Canada, but only names five: Pacific, Mountain, Great Lakes North, Great Lakes South and Champlain. Are there only five? Or is one omitted - possibly an Atlantic division or an eastern prairies division? GBC (talk) 22:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divisions in Canada - five or six?
Talk:Mary Pezzati

message: Why does Dylan get a right to reply in this article? Her article has every right to voice her opinions of Dylan, but Dylan is then allowed to answer and negate her opinions with his own words in HER ARTICLE? Er, I don't think so. Lion King 22:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Dylan quote does add some details and information to the article. It may not be the nicest portrayal of her granted but it does add some interesting info. I don't see a problem with it. It is after all from his viewpoint and the quote wouldn't be appropriate in his own article. Friuli 18:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree up to a point, but it would be better if it came from a second or third party. It would be quite different if it was Liam Clancy or Mark Spoelstra saying: "Oh no, Mary didn't give poor old Bobby a chance, I mean he was always buying Suze gifts, and stuff, and no of course he didn't spend all his money on guitars he didn't need, he was so generous it was unreal" etc. But from Dylan himself? Cursing the dead who cannot answer back? Lion King 21:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bob Dylan on Mary Rotolo?
Talk:London Police Service

message: Should this article be renamed to something like London Ontario Police Service?  RJFJR (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: I can't remove Police forces of London category for some reason, can someone do this? This is lumping this page in with UK pages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deku-shrub (talk • contribs) 22:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Category Police forces of London 
Talk:Niagara Regional Police Service

message: Hello - when I checked the links to fleet vehicles, all of those that I tested provided me with an all-black page.  Can somebody please look into updating those links to the current versions?  Thanks!  PKT(alk) 17:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to photos of fleet vehicles aren't working

message: In Vehicle Fleet, are the vehicles such is the Ford Taurus and Ford Explorer actually civilian models as said, or are they actually the Ford Police Interceptor as it is linked for the Crown Victoria Police Interceptor, if so, the text and link of both vehicle models should be changed to the place in the Ford Explorer article, such as this and this. In this document, it says, "Since that time, the Service has seen a number of changes in vehicle designs and features, such as the replacement of traditional rear-wheel drive Ford Crown Victoria for new all-wheel drive Interceptors."  70.24.172.210 (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the Ford vehicle models linked in Fleet Vehicles really the civilian ones?
Talk:Ontario Centre of Forensic Sciences

message: I just finished wikifying the article as best as I could. As I originally did not write the article and do not possess the necessary reference materials, I can't clean it up as well as I would have liked to. Please help clean-up the article, it still seems like it was written as an essay even though I've tried to clean it up as much as possible without altering the original article too much. The references definitely have to follow a singular, proper format. The article also needs to be updated, it appears it was written in 2008 and refers to the present as 2008 in some locations (I think I changed all of them, or at least I tried to).
Nitroblu (talk) 23:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified
Talk:HMS Indefatigable (1784)

message: The caption on the illustration herein states: "Battle between the French warship Droits de l'Homme and the frigates HMS Amazon and Indefatigable, 13 & 14 January 1797. (Indefatigable on the left, Droits de l'Homme at the centre, Amazon on the right.)"
However, both the ship on the left and the right are flying American flags!  Therefore, it is impossible for them to be the HMS Amazon and HMS Indefatigable, is it not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sloane77 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are not flying American flags, but rather the Red Ensign. It looks a bit like the US flag from the distance, but that is just an illusion. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 00:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration cannot be of the HMS Indefatigable (nor the HMS Amazon) as captioned 

message: There a quite a few additional citations needed in this article to meet MILHIST B Class. The assertion that she was almost obsolete at the time she was commissioned, the award of the Naval GSM to surviving crew, the fact that she was not involved in a particular action, the fact that she was laid up (or similar). I have not listed them all, a quick look through the article should identify them. Ping me when you're done and I'd be happy to have another look. Peacemaker67  (send... over) 23:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Some wiki pages have an "in popular culture" section - I don't know whether this would warrant a whole section, but perhaps some mention somewhere that this ship and Pellew feature heavily in the (very famous) Hornblower books (and TV series) wouldn't go awry. If nobody offers any judgement on where in the article to place this info, I'll endeavor to find somewhere to make the relevant edits in a few weeks time. pstils (talk) 10:17, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hornblower
Talk:Southern Catholic College

message: I added the lat/long link, but I am not exactly sure where the college is located.  I know it is adjacent to the Gold Creek Golf Club, so that is the point to which the link takes you (34° 27' 00"N, 84° 06' 25"W).  If anyone knows the precise location, please update the coordinates.  — Eoghanacht talk 22:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lat/Long ? 
Talk:Hejazi Arabic

message: This is more of an academic question than an editorial one.
Why is Hejazi Arabic grouped within the Peninsular dialect group, when it is clearly very close to the Nile/Egyptic group and especially Sudanese, and shares much more with them than with Central-Eastern Peninsular, Southern Peninsular, or even bedouin Hejazi?
--High surv (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialect group 

message: Is the history section on this dialect of Arabic supposed to be that of the urban Hejazi dialect, only not taking into account the other Hejazi dialects?   Jun221 (talk) 22:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Hejazi Arabic
Talk:Transit Enforcement Unit

message: Wikipedia is not a newspaper, so detailed accounts of each and every incident do not belong here. Also, cutting and pasting from news websites is a violation of copyright, which is bad for Wikipedia. Ground Zero | t 20:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I reformatted the article - adding sections - so that it flows a little better. I also removed the 2007 List of crimes as this is not a newspaper as someone mentioned before. I did however add Crime Statistics from a TTC report to reflect the nature and volume of the work without actually listing specific crimes and occurrences. I also added a section about the recent developments by Toronto Police and their desire to take control of this service and supported it with a reference from the star. Eja2k (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Update, Reformat, Add Future Section

message: This will require an overhaul of the article. The question is will this article morph to fit the new (and so far publicly at least un-named) entity that the constables will become, or should this article remain and be reverted to the past tense, as a historic representation of the program as it was. Thoughts? Comments? eja2k 20:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Special Constables program to end Jan. 31/Feb. 1 2011 at midnight

message: Now that the Special Constables have been disbanded for over 3 months, this article should be updated/renamed to fit the new designation, or a new article could be created. While the TTC has been slow to update the website, new transit safety advertisements make official 
reference to these people as "Transit Enforcement Officers". I'm not sure what the best way to procede should be: 
:A) A new article for the "new" designation.
:B) A major revision to this article shifting all the Special Constable stuff to a revised history Section, and a greater emphasis on the current role as Fare Enforcement/Bylaw Enforcement Officers.
Let me know your thoughts on how this article should proceed!eja2k 17:09, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to reflect the new status as 'Transit Enforcement Officers'
Talk:University of Toronto Campus Safety

message: This article is almost completely unsourced and reads like WP:PROMO. Over the next days/weeks I'll be going through the article and substantially overhauling the article to take a neutral position to its subject and cite reliable sources. I welcome feedback from anyone else who's watching this page. — cmonghost 👻 (talk) 16:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:PROMO
Talk:Vineet Narain

message: This article seems to be heavily weighted with praise and far from neutral in tone. -- Whpq 22:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tightened the section, mostly by removing unreferenced material that wasn't particularly relevant to the topic. --Gimme danger 04:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed much of the laudatory language from the article. Crusader isn't a word I expect to find in an encyclopedia unless it's referencing a medieval knight in the Middle East. However, in doing so I was forced to remove some information from the article either because I couldn't think of ways to rephrase sentences in neutral language or because sentences were vague. So, I took out a lot of vague, biased material, but much of that ought to be added back. It's clear that this gentleman is indeed a man to admire, but even after reading the article carefully I'm not quite sure exactly what he has done. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of India and the situation could try to expand the article in neutral language. I've changed the rating of this article from B-class to start-class. It definitely has potential, but needs work before reaching B-class. Primarily, I think, the article needs to be referenced and expanded.
And, completely off-topic, what does charge-sheeted mean? It seems to be an Indian English term that I've never encountered before. Naturally, the article should be in Indian English, but I would hesitate to use a term that doesn't seem to be standard usage, even in that dialect. --Gimme danger 04:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NPOV|POV issues]]
Talk:HMS Cornwall (1692)

message: I have commented-out the image block, as it doesn't make any sense at all to have one here. 3rd-rate ships wouldn't have been painted (or at the very least, rather unlikely to have been), and it was scrapped in 1761. Let's be rational in applying policy (or, rather, suggested guidelines which have been written, approved, and followed by a Special Interest Group without other input).
But please revert me if I'm proving myself a fool. :-)
James F. (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems sensible. Putting an image marker is fine, if it is an article where there's a fair chance of someone sourcing one some time soon. But in cases like this it will probably leave us with an ugly big box for years. If some wikiproject is demanding that, then they clearly need to rethink.--Docg 17:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have suggested at WT:SHIPS that the word photo be substituted for image, as it would make more sense, I agree. The use of the image though is intended to allow us to identify articles that currently lack images. Your input is of course most welcome in that particular discussion. Martocticvs (talk) 17:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Although, the idea that a third rate wouldn't have been painted is actually completely wrong - a great many ships other than first rates were painted for whatever reason. Martocticvs (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean "image" should be substituted for "photograph". However my point remains, whilst many such ships may have been painted, there is absolutely no way of knowing that this one was. Thus an ugly big box, bigger than any other text in the article, might remain indefinitely. That's not good. If you need a list of ships without images, there is surely a much less ugly way of generating that.--Docg 17:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, my mistake (typing too fast). I think your input would be valued at the WP:Ships discussion, WT:SHIPS#No Photo or No Image? as we are attempting to decide the best way around this issue, and still be able to keep track of articles lacking images. Martocticvs (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pointlessness of an image box
Talk:Gandingan

message: I'm going reformat "Gandingan", adding more information, more references and pictures within the next few days. Please bear with the initial mess. PhilipDM 22:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Major Overhauling Completed PhilipDM 21:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overhauling article 

message: Citing recommendations from the agung article, I'll start reorganizing the citations. This shouldn't take long. PhilipDM 19:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation overhaul completed. PhilipDM 19:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Overhaul for citations

message: I find that this article meets the good article criteria.  It is well-written, well-sourced and cited, makes good use of images, and covers its topic broadly and in significant depth.  Some further copyediting to tighten up the prose might be possible. Shimeru 21:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. You could expand the lead. Regards, T Rex | talk 00:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Pass