Talk:Archos

message: One important fact is still missing: Arnova is already independant from Archos businesswise. Still using patents and designs, but Archos Technology Hong Kong pays "royalty fees" etc. -> pls update information about Arnova  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.63.214.72 (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing information about Arnova

message: Hmmm, it is now May 2010 and no sign of the authors taking on board the many good suggestions on this page. I decided I'd go check consumer opinions on Amazon.com. The difference in tone is predictable but nonetheless startling. This article requires serious pruning. There must be an article about a similar size company that could serve as a template. Peut-être que je le ferai moi-même si les auteurs ne se manifestent pas rapidement. A bon entendeur.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.195.172.7 (talk) 21:02, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor article

message: This one article seems to be getting cluttered, and there is still more information that can be added especially about the newer 04 Series, and not to mention the upcoming 05 Series and ArchosTV Plus
*I've split some of the later series, but the new articles could use a good bit of cleanup  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TMV942 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperating Article 

message: :Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 16:58, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Cleanup Archive 

message: hopefully the edits currently going on will address this :)
--Frantik 06:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, i'd say it has just gotten even more like an advertisement since the edits have taken place. --Frantik 04:18, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I just added a (NPOV) tag to the page --Frantik 04:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Maybe some of the older machines are historically significant and one can make the case that it's not an advertisement if the item isn't currently being marketed.  But stuff about models in current production should be trimmed back radically.  Maybe it could be moved to Wikicities which would make putting in more kinds of content (like subjective opinions) permissible.  Phr 15:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm in the process of reworking the Archos#Pocket_Media_Assistant PMA section. Added some links to openPMA the alternative open source firmware that fixes many bugs that never got looked at after Archos abandoned firmware development. Added a CC-by-sa licensed picture. Reworking the feature list to sound less advertising and simply list the features.  Being one of the main developers of openPMA I may be a bit biased though. ;-) --ThomasBRuecker 15:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  product info is written like an advertisement 

message: I have tried to make this article as NPOv as possible, but it still may be a bit biased.  --Frantik 20:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Also recently, due to a violation of the gnu/linux license (the GPL), the source code for some of the firmware in their 04-series players has been released. This is certainly important enough to warrant a note on the page (Archos' website link: GPL software download page 65.112.197.16 01:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GPL violation/code release 

message: I'm not sure why the feature always gets changed, its a USB flash drive not just Flash Memory which can be a number of other things, and its release was only a year or two after the first flashdrive released TMV943 (talk) 02:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ArcFlash 

message: We will need to update this page, along with others, as the new Archos 5 and Archos 7 are about to be released, along with the Archos 5G later in December.  This is extremely significant.. 65.10.103.58 (talk) 17:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Archos 

message: I have tried to update it so that it doesn't just talk about a product alredy released but people keep reverting it back.
UniversityofPi (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update "upcoming Products" Section 

message: It needs clarification whether the Archos 101 has 800 Mhz (as current article states) or a 1Ghz processor (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbMTYoAgYPw&feature=player_embedded 2m41s)?
--Grzegon (talk) 14:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archos 101: 800 Mhz or 1Ghz processor 

message: This entry seems to be mainly a list of tech specs for past and current products. I don't see how this meets Wikipedia standards. --70.167.58.6 (talk) 22:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: perhaps we should have a page for discontinued products? they seem to swamp the page. I can do so if there are no objections IRWolfie- (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry seems to be a list of products 

message: As of later Android 2 versions, the compatibility definition document (PDF) describes cellular and GPS functionality as optional. Has Archos ever given a reason as to why its Generation 8 products fail to "comply with Google's compatibility requirements" as Android Market#Market application restrictions states? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 12:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good reasons are given at Android (operating system)#Licensing and Android (operating system)#Leverage_over_manufacturers. This effectively means that Archos might be relying on AOSP. -Mardus (talk) 02:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Market 

message: 14 (not: "2 14") hours music is correct?
"Internal storage: 8 GB*" asterisk "*" does mean anything?
--Helium4 (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  * 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Archos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101214034501/http://tablets-review.toptenreviews.com/archos-9-review.html to http://tablets-review.toptenreviews.com/archos-9-review.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified