Talk:List of Philippine mythological figures

message: *Suggestion: Please see Talk:Philippine mythology/to do box at Talk page of Philippine mythology article (main). - Dragonbite 18:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes on organization of Philippine mythology articles 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating 

message: Having read the first section of the article i am beginning to question the relevence of this article. Some of the more legnthy definitions of the gods are available on their own pages, for example the chief deity. Would this article not be better as a general list rather than a page, or possibly a category? It just seems a bit silly to have the articles and then this page replicating them. (Neostinker (talk) 14:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is half a decade after that last comment, but I tend to agree that this article has to offer more than just replicated material from individual pages.  While I do feel that the article is merited, I feel that this article needs more input in the form of systematic discussion of Philippine deities. There isn't exactly a lack of material, as there are numerous commentaries on the subject. Although as far as I know there might not be a single definitive analysis (as opposed to Philippine Lower Mythology, which has Maximo Ramos' book as a seminal source).- Alternativity (talk) 00:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Deities of Philippine mythology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526125514/http://www.ourownvoice.com:80/tales/tales2004a-2.shtml to http://www.ourownvoice.com/tales/tales2004a-2.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090911045425/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090907-223978/Bicol-artists-protest-Natl-Artist-awardees to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090907-223978/Bicol-artists-protest-Natl-Artist-awardees
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have added a "disputed section" template in the Bicol mythology section after the reveal that the Bulan-Sidapa story is a hoax after all. For more information, read here. Someone please clean up the Bicol section with proper references. Stricnina (talk) 23:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Bulan-Sidapa hoax 

message: Has anyone bothered to look at the references in this thing? Almost half of them are duplicates of each other (most likely referencing different pages). This needs to get cleaned up. NyanThousand (talk) 10:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup I already pointed that out and explained PCommission how to do that. Glennznl (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just requested the help of someone with an automated tool to clean up the page, lets keep it clean now and use ref names. Glennznl (talk) 23:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wonderful, thank you. Ionmars10 has already messaged me. PCommission (talk) 04:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: and : PCommission has been blocked as the latest sockpuppet of Xiang09. I see their influence has been extensive on this article. Feel free to do whatever with what they added based on your judgment and on WP:Block evasion. Crossroads -talk- 04:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yikes. The amount of work and content moved around different pages makes it very difficult to just undo it all. Aside from that, the state of the pages before he made his edits was very poor as well using mostly blogs and even Youtube videos as sources. His edits always seemed good faith and trying to make the article better, but I can't verify the sources he used or if he even used them. I am not sure what to do with this one. If we were to undo everything, I would actually lean towards deleting the whole article and starting over again. Glennznl (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: After the sockpuppet