Talk:McKenzie friend

message: Hi
I have added a cleanup template here as I think it might be useful to have a couple of more expert editorial eyes on the article.
To me it seems as if the citations are not wiki and the intro para is easy reading. The whole thing sounds more a like a law review article.
I'll try and make a start later. Frelke 08:26, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the statement "but are not covered by professional indemnity insurance" is irrelevant and misleading.  PI insurance only applies to those professionals who take out such cover.  An amateur legal adviser will not fall into this category.  The present wording implies that there is some sort of professional indemnity cover automatically available to advisers in courts.203.184.41.226 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 23:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I need a Mckenzie friend to take notes for me in Manchester during an assessment. I am coming forward as the carer for my two grandsons who would be adopted if I dont fight for them. Please contact Marlene on 07971896145 if there is anyone to be with me during my difficult struggle against social services of Bury Manchester. --84.71.123.88 09:48, 23 September 2008 [signature added by Abd]
:I removed this from the article. It probably doesn't belong here, either, but I'll leave that for someone else to decide. --Abd (talk) 14:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article page. 

message: As a former lawyer (yes I know!) We always refrerrd to them as a McKenzie's friend. I have just done a google for both terms and it looks like the term without the s is more common so I am going to add it as an alternative. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 04:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  McKenzie's Friend 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McKenzie friend. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312054050/http://www.todayonline.com/articles/164112.asp to http://www.todayonline.com/articles/164112.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McKenzie friend. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100403083531/http://www.nadrac.gov.au/www/nadrac/nadrac.nsf/Page/About_NADRACCouncil_Members to http://www.nadrac.gov.au/www/nadrac/nadrac.nsf/Page/About_NADRACCouncil_Members
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I added New Zealand to the jurisdictions permitting a McKenzie Friend. This is according to the Ministry of Justice.
--125.239.21.75 (talk) 04:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  McKenzie's Friend in New Zealand Law 

message: McKenzie friends are permitted in Canada, according to according to Courthouse Libraries BC and the Self-Represented Litigants Project. However, there is no right to a McKenzie friend in Canada and I am doubtful that this is true for all of the countries cited as having McKenzie friend provisions. Cyali (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  McKenzie friends in Canadian Law