lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Join-calculus

message: What is meant by "rendezvous communications"? Wikipedia fails to define the term elsewhere.
I've added a link to a new definition. Hope that helps! Ezrakilty 11:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I think I copied all the unique content from the Join-calculus (programming language) article. It may be safely deleted redirected here to Join-calculus#Languages_based_on_the_join-calculus. Contrary to what Mark viking said in the deletion discussion, it is a standalone programming language. I tried to clarify it. Caroliano (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Join-calculus (programming language) merge 

message: Can this article be provided with an intro that makes sense to casual passers by. 193.132.104.10 (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification required

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Join-calculus (programming language). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 25#Join-calculus (programming language) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Guy Macon (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Join-calculus (programming language)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:RS-82 (rocket family)

message: This is an excellent reference for any future updates: http://vvs.hobbyvista.com/Markings/bombs/vvsord.php
--Hrimpurstala (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A reference 

message: #Operational history says:
*First-ever use of aircraft-launched unguided rockets in combat took place August 20, 1939, during the Battle of Khalkhin Gol. 
whereas RP-3#History says:
*The first use of rockets fired from aircraft was during World War I. (and goes on to describe it)
Which article is correct? RP-3#History cites a source for the 20+ year earlier claim. --Teratornis (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First use of aircraft-launched unguided rockets in combat 

message: Are there any sources that show what the RBS versions of these rockets were?
86.147.131.143 (talk) 11:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RBS - APHE? 

message: Have carried out a general cleanup of the article, including additional references, so have removed the "Additional References Requirement" template. Ilenart626 (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup & Additional References
Talk:R-23 (missile)

message: Nice article but there's a nitpicky puzzle it doesn't answer.  The R-24T was basically a
"beyond visual range" missile, so it makes it questionable that it got a heat seeker
lock before launch from a target so far away.  That would imply it was launched in the
general direction of the target and performed midcourse guidance using a simple
autopilot, only obtaining a heat seeker lock at relatively close range.  That would
make it a sneaky attacker indeed.  However, this is just purely semi-informed 
speculation that could be dead wrong and it would be nice to get some details.
MrG 4.225.210.251 19:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the sources I've seen state that the range of the 23T is "6.5 km". I assume this is the visibility limit, which suggests it didn't have BVR. That said, there is a very distinct statement about "lock-on after launch" for the -24 version, which does suggest that it could be launched BVR anyway. No info on whether or not it had any sort of "real" midcourse though. Maury 13:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  R-24T Midcourse Guidance? 

message: Reading this article the section talking about how the Vympel company aquired an AIM-7M Sparrow III Missile in 1968 seems to be wrong. Everything that I have read says that the AIM-7M was initally field to the US in 1982. So shouldn't the line read that the Soviets aquired an AIM-7E Sparrow in 1968 Southernap 06:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviets Aquire US Missile before it was even built? 

message: You need to substantiate the following statement and quantify the term "many": "Many R-23 kills are reported in the war between Iran and Iraq when Iraqi MiG-23s fired them at Iranian F-4D/Es and F-5Es." How about reported incidents from Iraqi and Iranian sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 21:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More info
Talk:Wrzeszcz

message: ----
World War II was relatively kind to Wrzeszcz, as only a few buildings suffered damage. More destructive to the beautiful buildings was the communist regime's postwar policy of eradicating evidence of the borough's wealthy capitalists. Buildings were allowed to fall into disrepair and owners were evicted and their houses separated into tiny apartments which were then leased to people without means to maintain them.
----
EN: This statement is rather incorrect. Wrzeszcz has indeed survived World War II with only light damage, but further destruction wasn't done by the communist regime. It has been almost totally destroyed in 1945 when the Russian Army was liberating the area of Gdansk. There are many sources of evidence but the best way to prove this are photos of Gdansk from 1939-1945 period showing the city almost unharmed.
PL: Powyzsze stwierdzenie jest bardzo niescisle. Istotnie, Wrzeszcz przetrwal II wojne bez wiekszych zniszczen, jednak destrukcja dokonala sie nie w okresie rezimu komunistycznego, lecz w momencie wyzwolenia Gdanska przez wojska rosyjskie w 1945. Jest wiele zrodel potwierdzajacych ten fakt ale najlepszym dowodem sa wojenne fotografie z lat 1939-1945 ukazujace miasto prawie nietkniete.
Cheers/Pozdrawiam,
Spavatch 12:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Charlie Siringo

message: The brief biography section seems irrelevent  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.99.133 (talk) 04:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief Bio?? 
Talk:Jaime José Rotman

message: I removed the claim that Rotman is of Israeli descent, he had retired from playing football by the time the state of Israel was created. King of the North East 12:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Descent
Talk:MIM-72 Chaparral

message: Sorry, but I don't believe that this article is well written, as IMO it suggests that the MIM-72 surface-to-air missile, the M48 missile system and M730 carrier are all one and the same.  Furthermore, it makes no mention of the fact that the M52 Launcher Station, was not only fitted to the M730 guided missile equipment carrier, but was also mounted to a trailer which was towed by other vehicles (including the M730) and set up as a ground-based battery.
I suggest that those responsible for writing/maintaining this article (re)read the following manuals to determine exactly what is what, and amend the article accordingly (especially so as the article is currently flagged as requiring further citation):
* TM-9-1410-585-24P: Organizational, Direct Support, and General Support Maintenance for Guided Missile System, Intercept-Aerial MIM-72
* TM-9-1425-1586-10-1: System Description of Improved Chaparral Air Defense Guided Missile System
* TM 9-1450-585-34P: Direct Support and General Support Maintenance for Carrier, Guided Missile Equipment M730
* TM 55-2350-224-14: Transport Guidance M113 Family of Vehicles
Basically, the article as it currently exists should NOT be titled "MIM-72 Chaparral" but instead should be "M48 Chaparral" or to use its full title, Air Defense Guided Missile System, which I admit would be overkill for the title).
Regards,
Blammy1 (talk) 23:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: MIM-72 vs M48 vs M730
Talk:Zapodidae

message: I've seen two different spellings of this family, which is right or are they different families? I believe Zapodidae is right. Jack 12:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Zapodidae is in reference to family, Zapodinae is in reference to subfamily.  Most authorities consider the jumping mice to be a subfamily of the Dipodidae, others treat it as a separate family. --Aranae 20:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this page to Zapodinae for two reasons.  The first is to match Mammal Species of the World Vol 3, which is basically the standardized reference for mammal taxonomy.  I don't disagree with deviating from MSW3, but I think it requires a good reason and I don't there is one in this case.  Most importantly, the genus Sicista has been shown to be basal among the dipodoids and is not particularly related to the Zapodinae.  So if we treat Zapodidae as a family, what do we do with Sicistinae.  Overall, I think resorting to MSW3 is the best way to deal with this.  It's actually already present in half the dipodoid articles anyway.  --Aranae 04:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zapodidae or Zapodinae?
Talk:Abbey Pumping Station

message: Quote: 
:"It is the only engine house in the world where you can see four examples of the same beam engine in one building."
This may be true in one form or other, but Crossness Pumping Station in London also fits this description! However, I assume the difference between them is that Crossness' engines are not working. (line now edited to suit!)
EdJogg 13:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Only pump house with 4 engines..."?

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:
*52.65527 (Not 52.22167) -1.13050 (Is -1.13056
The Not Co-ords point to Everdon Hall
The Better ones are found using MultiMap with Post Code=LE4 5PE
Yours The_Andrew_Burgess@Yahoo.co.uk
:I've fixed the coordinates. —Snigbrook 20:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:AIR-2 Genie

message: Location of 2024 rocket is Bellevue Washington,  not Ohio
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68189568 138.128.232.71 (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Observer 144 implemented the change in this edit. Liu1126 (talk) 02:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2024
Talk:R-37 (missile)

message: Manufacturer's datasheet says 200km (http://www.missiles.ru/_foto/RVV-BD/IMG.jpg) and 280km for version with rocket booster on this link (http://www.missiles.ru/RVV-BD.htm).Z07x10 (talk) 17:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: Hello . I was patrolling recent changes when this edit popped up; and I went to look for sources on what the NATO reporting name was, but it seems 73.35.181.208 was not misguided on here since sources exist both claiming AA-13 Arrow and AA-13 Axehead to be the NATO name for R-37M.
* Axehead:    
* Arrow:     
Can anyone definitively confirm or deny either name? dibbydib⌐■_■ (barate me) 05:24, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrow or Axehead? 

message: It's called the Axehead.
Current Growler driver here. 73.35.181.208 (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's called Axehead by the folks that matter. 

message: There was an image that captured a very similar looking missile over Ukraine. Perhaps use in the current war in Ukraine can be added, although i struggle to think of any sources discussing the R-37's deployment there. 36.65.242.246 (talk) 08:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operational Service
Talk:Rock n' Roll Love Letter

message: "Chart Performance" section includes Japanese Oricon chart entry.  This is apparently wrong, as the definition says this album was issued only for the North American market.
In August 1976, a compilation album which was designed only for the Japanese market was issued under the title "ニュー・ベスト" or literally "New Best". For some reason, "Rock n' Roll Love Letter" logo was printed on the cover, as if it were the title of the album. The Japanese compilation album contained quite different tracklisting from the US compilation of the same name.  Even Discogs confuses those two identical compilation albums. 
If you can read Japanese, please check :ja:ニュー・ベスト (ベイ・シティ・ローラーズのアルバム), which if an article for the Japanese compilation.--山田晴通 (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Performance section contains confusion with a Japanese album
Talk:K-9 (missile)

message: I'd abbreviated the units in the infobox and was reverted by Sturmvogel 66.  I came back and redid what I'd previously done not realising I'd been reverted.  Abbreviating units in infoboxes just seems the sensible thing to do even if there is "plenty of room to display them" (which I don't think is the case when it comes to kilometres per hour).  As I see it, it's best to abbreviate units in infoboxes not just to save space but to make it easier to read (not so cluttered with letters).  Excuse my redoing the edit without comment. JIMp talk·cont 15:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Units

message: In "MiG-25 'Foxbat' Mig-31 'Foxhound': Russia's Defensive Front Line", the Ye-155 is described as having been planned to use the K-9. The Ye-155 is the prototype variant of the MiG-25, not the Ye-152A. I am not aware of any indication that the Ye-152A is the "predecessor" of the MiG-25/Ye-155 in anything but role - they were separate and concurrent design projects. Rsemmes92 (talk) 18:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ye-152A vs Ye-155 usage, "predecessor" claim
Talk:K-8 (missile)

message: Could someone with a philiogical background comment on the word Anab? Reporting names like Apex or Aracher (AA-7 & AA-11) make more sense, but what does that word mean? A combination of A and the verb (to) nab?
Maybe one day espionage data will be declassified for research on how such names were chosen and by whom...
Theharpguy 00:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only Anab I'm familiar with is the name of a town near Hebron in the Middle East.  And here I had always misread the call name as Ahab.  The Dark 17:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe - and it's just a guess - that it may refer to the Judean town of Anab from which Joshua expelled the Anakim, a sort of fallen heavenly being. Askari Mark (Talk) 04:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anab?

message: Why was it named after Kaliningrad, the post-1945 Russian name of the former German city of Königsberg? Sca (talk) 21:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not. The designation refers to the former name of Korolyov, Moscow Oblast, where it was designed. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 09:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Kaliningrad"
Talk:Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie

message: As on German Wikipedia, there is a convenient template in order to link to a scanned ADB biography, see Template talk:ADB.
*  yields
* 
Hopefully, it soon will be only ADB rather than de-ADB, due to a conflict on the use of Template:ADB.-- Matthead  DisOuß   18:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ADB template as on German Wikipedia
Talk:Kh-22

message: diameter cannot be 181 cm if you look at the photograph, could be around 100 cm...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpine boarder (talk • contribs) 21:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

message: According to the article on Tu-22 they are believed to have been phased out, but this article does not mention the M3 version.150.227.15.253 (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status? 

message: AFAIK, this field is meant to say how many were produced, not when it was introduced. Hunter Hutchins (talk) 10:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so. A quick look at the template shows the argument is production_date. Hope this helps. GabberFlasted (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Produced" field
Talk:Maurice Martenot

message: The biography by Jean Laurendeau has not been translated to English, according to the Peter Pringle site. Twang 04:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arnie Ginsburg

message: Will be rewriting this weekend, please give time. Thank you. --NuclearZer0 13:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:9K720 Iskander

message: The Patriot destroyed on March 9 was the first clearly confirmed, not "the first time". No one knows (except the ones who knows) how many have been really destroyed, beyond any claim or counterclaim (or may I say, "PR"). 152.206.236.210 (talk) 04:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About destroyed Patriot units
Talk:Cardinality equals variety

message: This doesn't make sense: This page says that the whole tone scale doesn't posses Cardinality equals variety and that maximally even scales do. Okay. But, on the maximally even page it says that the whole tone scale is maximally even.  They can't both be right, right?--SurrealWarrior 13:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. Hyacinth 18:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Whole tone scale

message: The entire intro had been sourced. The effort to clarify has made it less verifiable by removing the citation and possible the information. Hyacinth 18:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro
Talk:Mindoo Phillip Park

message: The name of this page is incorrect. It should be Mindoo Phillip Park, and not Philip. But I'm not seeing how to edit the name...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryfinisterre (talk • contribs) 16:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done it for you. You have to use the "Move" option in the drop-down box, next to the star and the "View history" tab, on the article page. Regards, EP111 (talk) 01:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Toyota Sequoia

message: Anyone want to create a section for the upcoming diesel model?
http://forums.motortrend.com/70/6543162/the-general-forum/toyota-tundra-diesel-confirmed/index.html
ThanksMantion (talk) 02:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Was a diesel model ever released? It seems the idea was confirmed by Toyota and then dropped anyway - which is why I'm always hesitant to put in future claims.  Stepho  talk  10:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diesel 

message: and myself have a disagreement over whether wheel rims should have a metric conversion or not. The particular sentence under contention is:
I prefer metric in general and have no problem with US articles having most measurements being shown in imperial then metric. However, wheel rims are nearly universally done in inches. The only vehicle I can think of in my own country (Australia) with metric wheel rims was the Lada Niva and most owners threw away the metric rims and bought custom rims that took tyres in inch sizes (buying new rims was cheaper than finding super rare metric rubber tyres). To my knowledge, the US is in the same position as Australia regrading tyres sold in inches. So, should wheel rims have metric conversions in this article or shall we assume that practically all users are okay with inches in this restricted context. Note: vehicles lengths, widths, etc should still have metric conversions because vehicle lengths in inches is not universal outside of the US. Or perhaps I should take the question to the automobiles project because the same arguments for and against would apply to most vehicle articles.  Stepho  talk  03:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  wheel rim sizes in mm
Talk:Glossitis

message: How much do we need separate articles for these? All the sources I am looking at for glossitis are treating it as near synonymous with atrohpic glossitis. Even more strangely, atrophic glossitis is not mentioned specifically on this page, even though it is described by sontent like "smooth tongue" etc. Who ever wrote this page before has defined glossitis as "inflammation/swelling of the tongue" whereas a quick search on PubMed with filters reviews and last 5 years activates shows that the term glossitis is treated in most publicaitons as a synonym of atrohpic glossitis. Since Atrophic glossitis just a 2 line stub with all the causes already covered in this main glossitis page, I'm going to merge them together, keeping only the synonyms. Essentially, I do not think atrophic glossitis is clearly enough separated as a topic from glossitis to warrant its own page. Lesion (talk) 23:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what has happened. The article was reworked a while back to be based on what is now medline plus ... . This page seems to be talking about tongue swelling, where as most glossitis causes minimal size increase in the tongue, and only changes the appearance of the tongue. There is no need to remove this content, since it could be argued that gloss + itis = tongue inflammation, and swelling is one of the cardinal signs of (acute) inflammation, but I think a process of adding better sources which use the term glossitis in its normal sense will help the article. Lesion (talk) 23:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glossitis and [[atrophic glossitis]]? 

message: I think from a broken template? I have no idea how to fix it. 74.132.8.133 (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some code is being displayed 
Talk:Malignant Pied Pipers of Our Time (book)

message: #Analyzed in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry.
#Featured in 2006 History Channel documentary Cults: Dangerous Devotion.
#Plenary speech at the annual meeting of The American Society of Psychoanalytic Physicians, in 2006.
#Required reading at King's College, Pennsylvania, course on "American Cults".
*More listed in article mainspace.  Smee 12:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability backed up by citations 

message: The book isn't a cult leader, as far as I can tell. It would be beter under "cults" or "books on cults" or "books on cult leaders"(if there was one). Sfacets 07:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why the " * " is used to alphabetize it, and put it separate from the other individuals.  Smee 08:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cult leader" cat
Talk:Sound post

message: This article seems sufficiently extended now any objections to removing the stub tag? Alan Kroeger 13:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright I removed the tag string-instrument-stub Alan Kroeger 14:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal Of Stub Tag

message: Any objections to merging ame (music) into this article?  It's little more than a definition.—Ketil Trout 00:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged—Ketil Trout (<><!) 23:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Ame (music)]]

message: — Assignment last updated by Anacasb (talk) 14:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Public Musicology
Talk:Dancenorth

message: Is this the correct spelling of the company's name?  I checked the official website and it looks something like dancenorth-australia (i.e. hyphenated).  What do you think?  While I'm at it:  in the context of the article, should the name be capitalised? Niël 16:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the hyphenation, but I did consult with some wikipolicy at the time about names that are deliberately non-capitalised, but can't remember where.  Good to see you getting into these articles, many of the articles I started have not had much peer review.  Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 14:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I moved the article.  Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner - I forgot to add this page to my watchlist. Niël 14:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Name has changed again to Dancenorth Paul foord (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of Name
Talk:Media in Townsville

message: As the lead (uncited BTW) says, "Townsville is the media centre for North Queensland".  I suggest this article be renamed to Media in North Queensland to enable more general content and thus avoiding issues with respect to WP:LOCAL.   (In a semi-related issue, Media in the City of Thuringowa is now at AfD (discuss)). —Moondyne 14:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts were to expand it to include Charters Towers, Ingham, Ayr, Home hill etc., else we need to find a home for those if someone is inclined to start editing that. —Moondyne 02:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal