lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bionicle Universe

message: This page is not needed.  The existing page which I am redirecting it to is far superior to this and already covers much of the information given here.  And can't redirect because it is in the making?  Nice try, but no.  Please do not recreate this page again. ElectricTurahk 20:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
File talk:Iraqcontrol.JPG

message: Looks like a Risk map
::This is quite inaccurate as insurgents by nature do not control provinces or territories, but they do have a guerilla presence in regions. Its misleading to try and make a map of who controls what territories, because noone controls the entire territory effectively and certainly not insurgents. A better map would be one which shows areas of influence, or areas of high attacks. ~Rangeley (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lionel Crabb

message: Soviet combat driver decapitated Crabb when he tried to mine Khruchev's cruiser. The BBC News website has it all.
It is incredible how insane PM Eden became due to his amphethamine and morphine addiction. Trying to sink Khruschev in a british port with a mine? That would result in WWIII with H-bombs and mankind erased. That man was a lunatic, he thought Nasser is Hitler's reincarnation, so he orgainzed the disastrous tripartite agression on Suez, which almost caused atomic war against the USSR and sealed the fate of british empire might. -- 91.83.16.57 (talk) 20:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't look "over" to me. That BBC page says "It's one of the great unsolved Cold War mysteries." Maproom (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theories are over, mystery is over, story is over, all over at BBC News. 

message: Not that mythbusters is the final word, but they did many tests on the feasability of shooting someone or something in the water, and they concluded that it was impossible because the bullets shatter in the water.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.103.249.13 (talk) 16:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mythbusters taken into account? 

message: Seems to me that the incident might be notable enough for its own article.Lord Cornwallis (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate article for Crabb Affair

message: Wikipedia - for reasons best known to itself - fails to highlight the theory put forward by J Bernard Hutton (only mentioned as an afterthought) that Buster Crabb was offered work as a Russian frogman, training others, under the name S S Korablov. He was therefore NOT a double agent but simply a man faced with a choice between liquidation or survival doing something at which he was expert - with good pay and conditions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.170.192.138 (talk) 13:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  S S Korablov 

message: I added this to "other links."
Williams, David (16 November 2007). "Cold War mystery solved? I killed Buster Crabb says Russian frogman". London: Daily Mail. Retrieved 26 December 2011. Wiki4Thal (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-frogman techniques
Talk:Bushnell University

message: Wherefore the name Northwest Christian University/College has been in use for the vast majority of recent memory, and the name change occurred so recently, I propose that the previous name should be referred to in the lead somewhere, probably just as an added sentence at the end, "The school was known as Northwest Christian University until 2020."
The current state of affairs can be rather confusing for someone aware of NCU but not aware of the name change, which I expect is a large demographic at the moment. I'll go ahead and do it if there's no objections?
Koricind (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 01:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous Name in Lead
Talk:Northwest Film Center

message: Currently this article does not demonstrate notability and as such is subject to deletion unless reliable third party sources are added. Aboutmovies 19:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: this is my first wiki article and while i was updating it an administrator flagged it.  It will take some time to finish, but it has cultural significance and should be include in wikipedia.  I will add some third party sources in due time as well as more internal wiki hyperlinks.  Do not delete this article, because it will be a loss to the portland area and www at large. thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NW Film Center (talk • contribs) 22:09, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. The rating scale you are quoting above is a separate issue from general notability. The rating scale is merely a way to sort articles by the priority in which they should be handled by the WikiProject. Please read up on notability by clicking this link: WP:NOTE, where you will find suggestions on how to establish notability. I'll take a look and see what I can do with the article, but I suspect a great deal of the info in a copyright violation, and forgive me for saying so, but the formatting is atrocious. I may be reverting the article to an earlier version. Katr67 (talk) 00:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: please keep this page

message: I just removed the entire Education section because:
# it was written mostly in a promotional style; 
# all the links were to primary sources on the organization's site; 
# those links are now 404s with the new redesign; and 
# the new site shows no sign of doing anything with an education program.
- Dyork (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Education section
Talk:Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Kulak

message: Please, please merge this with KULAK
There is now building D and there has never been one!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.150 (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Austin Powers Pinball

message: As there's 3 inbound links, I think this all we're likely to get for this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitplane (talk • contribs) 03:44, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 
:Agreed with removal, but that sentence didn't make any sense. Having 3 links already isn't a reason to suspect we'll never get any more. And in fact there's quite a large number more now. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 01:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing orphan status
Talk:Complexification

message: Should we include some discussion/links regarding complexifications of a Lie algebra? Or the generalization for modules? (tensoring a module with a larger ring) Commentor (talk) 04:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this content be put under the title "complexification of vector spaces" or "complexification in linear algebra"?
And dually, shouldn't this article talk about complexification of other mathematical structures?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.135.182 (talk) 00:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other forms of complexification
Talk:Calvin, Louisiana

message: Is the town named after John Calvin?--69.51.160.98 15:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Named After
Talk:Leo du Pres and Greenlee Smythe

message: *I am currently working on improving all of the soap couple articles on Wikipedia. While I, of course, understand the fact that articles on Wikipedia shouldn't only provide plot summaries, all of these soap opera couple articles will be worked on and formatted to fit Wikipedia policy, which is why Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas exists, and is why I ask other editors to hold off on nominating these soap opera couple articles for deletion. To go around and delete these soap opera popular and or supercouple articles is not the answer. Clean-up is. I will get around to fixing up this article, in which will be soon. Flyer22 22:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to note that this article has been fixed up now. There is still much room left for improvement, however. Flyer22 (talk) 08:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chotto Ookii Theatre Company

message: The official company website link doesn't work.  
Can somebody please fix it.  
Jason M
Here you go Jason.
all the best Bren.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.21.33 (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Composition (combinatorics)

message: Why not add the "more refined argument shows that the number of compositions of n into exactly k parts is given by the binomial coefficient"
Basically the same array is used but choose (k-1) places to put commas and fill the rest with plusses. This can be placed 1-1 with compositions into k parts. There are (n-1) boxes, hence the result. This is not more refined but quite understandable (A1jrj (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no definition of what "a k-composition of n" is in the last section before the references. Propose this to be "A k-composition of n is a composition of n with at most k elements".Bj norge (talk) 18:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacks a definition

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Composition (number theory and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Composition (number theory until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Composition (number theory" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Law enforcement in Ireland

message: could someone please add information to law inforcement in the Republic of Ireland  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.141.12.218 (talk) 19:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  editing 

message: While the airport police use the term 'Police' they are not law enforcement officers and are privately employed security staff within the airport. They cannot make an arrest other than a citizens arrest similar to a shop security guard nor can they investigate crime, charge suspects or bring cases before the courts. Perhaps unknown but law enforcement in the airport is actually provided by An Garda Siochana via its Dublin airport Garda station (seen on the left after you exit a Ryanair flight). On this basis I thinkthe Airport police should be removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.17.63 (talk) 09:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Valid point that law enforcement , in the civil sense , is the Gardaí at the airport but under the transport act of 1950'something the Airport police have rights to enforce the relevant laws from the act in Irish airports and the duties which stem from this act , so in effect even though its not common civil law enforcement it is still law enforcement , so that can be dealt with and mentioned in the article .Murry1975 (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airport police 

message: Ireland feature one National Police Service the Gardai and several smaller police services who provide a policing function to specific transport infrastructure that require them.
I have re edited this page after the other police services had been removed to only show the Gardai.
This is now an accurate reflection of the police service that exist in the Republic.
(ROK123)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROK123 (talk • contribs) 09:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your edits. I've changed them to be summary style. The details of ROI policing should be placed in Law enforcement in the Republic of Ireland; the purpose of this article is more to serve as a summary, and eventually could contain more details about historical law enforcement across the island, or around collaboration between RoI/NI - but the details of RoI should be maintained in Law enforcement in the Republic of Ireland, as anyone coming from the template on law enforcement in Europe will go directly to the RoI page. --KarlB (talk) 14:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated law enforcement section
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Nottingham

message: Recent revisions have added development about "deaneries", adding sections for each of 12.  The infobox states there are 13. --Doncram (talk) 03:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 or 13 deaneries 

message: Hey, i see a standardized formatting is being used in the new tables for each deanery.  This includes a "Description" column and a separate "Sources" column.  Personally, i don't like separating the sources, because it begs the question "sources for what?"  And it suggests to me that the sources are padding, when I can't see what they support.  And in practice this introduces confusion/lack of clarity on which specific assertions are supported by which specific source.  Template:More footnotes needed is a maintenance tag which states "This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations", which arguably applies here.  If/when any source is an offline one, or one or more source's link goes dead, it becomes impossible to check whether the set of assertions made for the topic are adequately supported, and makes it hard to maintain/develop in the future.
When creating entries in the related, same-formatted List of Roman Catholic churches in Leicester, i used multiple inline sources in several entries, and i think they are being stripped away to stand separately/unconnected.  Can we change this?  Or, i dunno, are there guidelines about this in particular? --Doncram (talk) 00:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting sourcing inline or separately 

message: Recent edits have used the abbreviations 'St.' and more rarely 'S.', rather than 'St' which is more commonly used for British Wikipedia subjects. (For example, the titles of each church in the diocese with its own Wp page uses the 'St' form.)
I am inclined to alter 'St.' and 'S.' to 'St' throughout, but thought I would let others comment first. Nedrutland (talk) 07:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection here.  I was not aware of the British variant. Cbl62 (talk) 07:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now completed. Nedrutland (talk) 07:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Saint' 

message: I have blanked the entire section which was a directory of churches within the diocese.  See policy at Wikipedia is not a directory. Springnuts (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanked section
Talk:List of Rangers F.C. international footballers

message: Surely this article should be headed "internationals" - who ever uses the word "internationalists" to refer to football players? - fchd 15:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would usually use "internationalists" ahead of "internationals". But maybe that's just me. One thing I was thinking is that it should maybe be titled List of Rangers F.C. internationalists though. WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 15:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Rangers F.C. internationals implies Rangers' playing international games. The article began its life at Rangers F.C. internationals, but I moved it, in line with the section heading in the main Rangers article. - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 19:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: So far - Jean-Alain Boumsong and Marcus Gayle. Both of their international careers on their articles took in the time they spent at Rangers, but I've not been able to find out if they actually played during that time. WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 20:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jimmy Gordon is another. Seems quite likely he played for Scotland at some point in his Rangers career, but no confirmation.  WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 20:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: N'Diaye and Faye required vetting. Johnelwaq (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Players needing checked
Talk:Islamic empire

message: ''''
There is no such thing as an Arab Empire and it is wrong to say so. The actual Superpower that was started by the Arabs is the Islamic Empire which at times was ruled by Persians.
:yes their was, its a fact that the arabs ruled one large Empire from china to spain, and whth the decline of the abbasids, the persians did their own islamic state, that was ruled by several dynasties... along the Islamic "empire" the muslim world was usually divided into an arab part and a persan part...
Well your Wrong, Infact...
:::There is a mistake that people make and that is that they confuse the Arab Empire with the Muslim Empire, not once in Islam's history did itcontroll ALL muslim populated areas by one country, while the Arab Empire is just one Empire that has been divided into several Dynasties such as the Rashidun, Abbasids, Ummayids, Ayubids, Tulunids, Fatimids etc... just like china's different Dynastic eras.
meenwhile there were other Empires in the greater Muslim world such as the Persian Dynasties of Samanids, Seljuq dynasty, Khwarezmid Empire, Timurid dynasty, Safavid Dynasty, Qajar dynasty, and many others, i think we should start a good representable Article to include all the previous Arab Dynasties adjacent to the Persian Empire's article...  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arab League (talk • contribs).  
i agree with you, but it needs to be called [Arab]] rather then Arabian, since arabia is ==
 the geographical terminology of the arabian peninsula, while Arab means all arabs ethnically, which includes the ummayid, rashidun, abbasids, fatimids etc...
Arab League User (talk) 23:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cone (topology)

message: This article makes the standard mistake about cones; it assumes that the cone is defined via the quotient topology and then it pretends that the homotopy 
:ht(x,s) = (x, (1−t)s).
is obviously continuous.  Thus cones are obviously contractible to their apex.  I don't know a treatment that makes this transparently obvious... Here is one discussion: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/189978/the-cone-is-contractible.  Sam nead (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

message: Is the notation 
CX = \varinjlim \bigl( (X \times [0,1]) \hookleftarrow (X\times \{0\}) \xrightarrow{p} v\bigr) 
meant to suggest that the cone is the pushout of the indicated span? If so, please write it explicitly.
164.15.244.37 (talk) 07:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation "lim"
Talk:Seeing Double (2003 film)

message: Things to do:
*Plot
*Cast List
*Pad out the infobox
Anything else? - ǀ Mikay ǀ 16:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good start, but I'm going to tag it with copyedit needed, and a lot of references will need to be cited. I'll go through it myself when I have time. - ǀ Mikay ǀ 19:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tidied up article a bit and added some content along with sources. Danny157 (talk) 22:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to do
Talk:Conformal equivalence

message: "Two geometries are equivalent" can perhaps be changed to something more detailed?
Two pseudo-Riemannian manifolds ... ? Pierreback 14:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

message: What is the ralation between conformal equivalence and conformal conjugation ?--Adam majewski (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  conjugation 

message: The article redirects to Conformal geometry but it contains information that is not found in the Conformal geometry article.
In fact it contains the information I was looking for.
The "See also" section of Conformal geometry contains a link to this article. Clicking the link on the Conformal geometry page then redirects to same page again.
Solution 1: move the contents of this article to the Conformal geometry article.
Solution2: remove the redirect and make this page a "real" page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.100.91.136 (talk) 01:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: Simply deleting the content of the page is not the solution to the redirect problem.
Imho the content meets the wikipedia standards, so it should remain.
A fix should also include fixing the circular link on the Conformal geometry page: Conformal geometry→Conformal Equivalence→Conformal geometry.
213.127.102.143 (talk) 04:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Undid deletion
Talk:Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (United Kingdom)

message: The article mentions that "It was the last Ministry of the United Kingdom government not to be a Department of State", but Department of State links to the American Department of State, and it is not explained in the article.  It looks like it refers to Departments of the United Kingdom Government, but as I am not sure I have not added the link, and also if this is correct it is unclear what MAFF was before that. —Snigbrook 20:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article also needs expansion as it only covers up to World War II, I have added an  tag. —Snigbrook 20:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Department of State
Talk:Conformally flat manifold

message: Can somebody please add references for the statements made in the Examples section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.65.239.16 (talk) 04:59, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: references

message: I'm not sure, but the Yamabe problem seems to say that *every* Rieman manifold is conformally equivalent to one of constant scalar curvature. This seems not to hold for pseudo-Riemannian manifolds; and its unclear to me whether or how "can be made flat locally" is promoted to a global statement. That is, are there manifolds which can everywhere be made flat locally, but can't be made such globally? (viz some kind of combing-of-hair type theorem?) 67.198.37.17 (talk) 04:51, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamabe problem
Talk:Prawn sandwich brigade

message: i think a reference to the use of this term by roy keane is enough
the entire first paragraph is a personal rant  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.210.35.24 (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Facebook was founded in 2004.  So that sounds wrong  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.109.234.103 (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facebook Status in 'rant' from 2000
Talk:Troodos Mountains

message: Hi all
The page was moved by an editor without discussion. I have reverted as I found over a million search results for "Troodos" and only 25,000 for Troödos.
The editor, User:Neo ^ , has also been changing this in Cyprus articles. I have left a note on their talk page. Chaosdruid (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: the lead says: "located in roughly the center of the island." and " stretches across most of the western side of Cyprus." I'd go for the latter.Wikirictor (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where? 

message: Hi, in the climate table there are two rows entitled "Mean maximum °C (°F)" and "Mean minimum °C (°F)", which appear redundant given the table also features "Average high °C (°F)" and "Average low °C (°F)". These seemingly redundant entries are also confusing as the statistics given for Average high °C (°F) and Mean maximum °C (°F) are different, as are those given for Average low °C (°F) and Mean minimum °C (°F). Normally, one pair, e.g. "Mean maximum °C (°F)" and "Mean minimum °C (°F)" would instead be something like "Record maximum" and "Record minimum" given they are the highest and lowest single temperatures listed and "Average high °C (°F)" and "Average low °C (°F)" are already included. Mainemce (talk) 21:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate table
Talk:List of characters in Blue Velvet

message: I agree that spoilers are unencyclopedic on Wikipedia, particularly in the way they force editors to write around spoilers.  This distorts the writing, and by applying excessive weight to plot twists it makes neutral point of view difficult to find.  People who don't want to know the plot of a film shouldn't read the encyclopedia article about the film. --Tony Sidaway 00:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers