Talk:United States Army enlisted rank insignia of World War II

message: some had altered the Technician Class to Grade, i have corrected this
89.207.208.25 10:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Every source I've encountered lists these as Grades, not Classes.  Given the dubious nature of other edits to military rank articles from the 89.207.208.X set of IP's unless you can provide a verifiable source, I will be reverting back your change if you do so again. Caerwine Caer’s whines 17:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed Grade to Class 

message: Ok, clearly not everyone will agree with some of the edits I've made, with the new tables and section changes.  Speak up and help improve things.  Thx. — MrDolomite • Talk 20:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article layout 

message: What was the difference between MSG and SFC in World War II?  Given the Army that I served in, if there's a distinction in insignia, there's a corresponding difference in jobs/MOS.  What was the case here?  Drieux 20:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification Question

message: :Image:WWIISGDBCPL.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WWIISGDBCPL.jpg

message: I've just vector-ified all the 1942 style images where the colour scheme is correct (khaki on blue), and also set the article to use these same images for the 1920 insignia shown. However, according to http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Rank_page/History_of_Enlisted_Ranks.htm these should be 'olive drab' insignia on dark blue. It'd be nice if someone could take my SVGs and create olive drab ones so this would be correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktims (talk • contribs) 20:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insignia colours for 1920 rank insignia 

message: Despite explaining something regarding the rank structure...what this article does not explain is what this rank actually did? What were these sergeants technical at? Was this a rank regarding military expertise/combat or was it to do with administration? It does note they were not often addressed by their T/Sgt rank but by an equivalent ordinary rank. Could someone explain this in more detail as to what this independent rank system was for, ie its purpose. Was it to reward specialists ie demolition/explosive handlers, language translator, radio operators. What exactly?86.182.54.68 (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Sergeant? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Gdhdhgh. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 2#Gdhdhgh until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  CycloneYoris talk! 06:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gdhdhgh" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]