lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christmas controversies

message: An IP editor has been trying to edit-war in Boris Johnson "canceling Christmas" on this page, and while they have finally stopped using that terminology, this insertion has a basic problem: the Evening Standard source being used doesn't show any controversy in the move. It does say that some health folks don't feel the new strain is as deadly as they claim, but there's no statement from them against the restrictions. The only non-Johnson statement on the restrictions comes from Keir Starmer, who, while finding the chance to snipe against the government's inconsistency, supports following these regulations. There may well be controversy over this move, but if so, it isn't in this source. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-controversy Christmas cancelation 

message: Would be reasonably come here trying to come to find information on Christmas Truce? Even with the term War on Christmas, I don't really see how that gets interpreted as what soldiers did in World War I on Christmas. I'll leave it in for now because it's not harmful, but if any other editors have input on whether or not it's a probable enough accidental search to have a hatnote for it. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 19:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Christmas truce]] <nowiki>{{redirect}}</nowiki> 

message: The article includes the claim: "As early as 336, Roman Christians observed Christmas on 25 December of the Gregorian calendar", which is logically impossible as the Gregorian calendar was not introduced until 1582 (by Pope Gregory), more than a thousand years later.
86.11.96.95 (talk) 16:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gregorian calendar 

message: Lots of content and citations to the American Family Association, which is not a reliable source, and in most cases, not an actual controversy, but rather a manufactured controversy that AFA invented.  All of these should be removed and replaced with appropriate secondary sources if at all possible.  This strange idea that a partisan, activist organization gets to invent any controversy they want and then to use citations from the same org to talk about the controversy they invented needs to stop.  That's not how things work. Viriditas (talk) 02:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Family Association
Talk:Hyas

message: This article sounds legitimate to my ear, but was worded ambiguously.  I checked out the one source that is cited and it does not seem to contain the majority of the information contained herein.  So I added an "unreferenced" tag.  I also tried to neutralize the opinionated sounding stuff. -Wiccan Quagga 06:21, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: ...what was the cited soiurce, which you do not identify? --Wetman 16:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably this one, as it appears to be the only reference as of the time I made my edit:  Harry Thurston Peck, Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities, 1898.  Since this is a very brief entry it stands to reason that most of the article was derived from other sources.  Thank you for your subsequent improvements --Wiccan Quagga 00:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The Amazons are emphatically not "Greek women". But surely you knew that. The commonplaces about the mourning role for Greek women, who were normally kept in seclusion, is particularly explored in Gail Holst-Warhaft, Dangerous Voices: Women's Laments and Greek Literature. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. I've added that to the article, and an on-line link to the review of it, which you might glance at. Is that better now? Still "suspect"? Any further issues? --Wetman 16:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:NFL Primetime

message: Can someone provide claiming that "current season (2006) is slated to be the show's last..."? I can't find one. It doesn't make sense that the NBC broadcasting rights to Sunday Night Football would effect a standard NFL highlight news show. I doubt ESPN would let go easily one of their highest rated/popular television programs just because NBC has their own pre-game show for the Sunday Night Football telecast. --J. Nguyen 06:21, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source?

message: Can some one find the new logo
Not without risking complaints about using ESPN property, I reckon... Zigwithbag (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo

message: Was all the music backing the highlights in fact from NFL Films/Sam Spence?  I am aware NFL Films used other composers (Dave Robidoux was one), and ESPN has used production music from many different sources (not aware of specifics) Zigwithbag (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: That reads as a really weird phrase.  It should be more like NFL Season or NFL Football Season.  The American Football part is totally unnecessary and redundant, why not spell out NFL too?  I'd change it but am not sure how, nor would I want to change it without hearing the reason for the original phrasing first.  
Fritigern (talk) 04:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "NFL American Football Season"
Talk:Everybody's Free (To Wear Sunscreen)

message: Is it legal to reprint the lyrics?  Ingoolemo talk 06:29, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: More accurately, is it legal to reprint Mary Schmich's column in full? I doubt it, but I'm not sure. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-03 06:39:03Z
Why not just add a link to them on an external website?  (This one is quite good and looks official: http://supak.com/sunscreen.htm)  Very few other songs have thier lyrics printed on Wikipeidia, but links handle the copyright side of it themselves as well as being accurate.--The Wizard of Magicland 17:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Posting the lyrics would be a copyright violation.  Select passages from the lyrics would be okay if they are discussed.  Dismas|(talk) 01:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Endgame

message: There is two films with the same title but concerns rather different things...
Whilst this concerns chess, the other film does not: a 1983 Italian film concerning a post-WWIII TV game-show warrior and mutants..
*
DoctorWho42 06:34, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 

message: Given the number of articles on this disambig page is it time to move it to Endgame? -- Alan Liefting-talk- 23:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Endgame? 

message: Expected much from wiki.
-G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow, Endgame, the documentary dealing with the new world order has no article or link

message: Neither Terminology of BitTorrent nor Bittorrent nor BitTorrent (protocol) contain an explaination of bittorrent endgame mode. --Kuzetsa (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bittorrent endgame mode doesn't link to a useful explaination. 

message: I pulled the see other category and added it's single entry into the music section.  I am not going to pass judgement on if the album meets notability requirements or violates advertising...
* The End of the Game, an album by British blues rock musician Peter Green  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamM1rv (talk • contribs) 11:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: See other

message: I feel that if a user types in "Endgame," they should be redirected to the page Avengers:Endgame. There should be an option to visit the endgame disambiguation page at the top of that article. What do you think?HAL333 20:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Relevant?
Talk:BASIC (disambiguation)

message: I think that BASIC (the language) is much more prominent than BASIC (the London think tank). I do not personally know of the ladder, but it is a (sub)stub, while the former is almost a FA. I vote for a pagemove of the language to here, because I'm sure the vast majority of queries for BASIC are going for this. Any thoughts? Ideas? -Mysekurity 06:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move BASIC programming language to here?
Talk:David D. Barrett

message: Colonel David Barrett is one of those forgotten men of history.  He saw and experienced much that the U.S. Army went through in China prior to, during, and immediately after the Second World War.  He was notably the commander of the Dixie Mission, a role that essentially destroyed his career.  Prior to Patrick Hurley's arrival in Yenan, Barrett had  began working to initiate more cooperation between the Chinese Communists and the U.S., and assisted Hurley in the proceedings upon the Oklahoman's arrival.  Unfortunately, his role in being "friendly" with the Communists cost him a general's star, and eventually destroyed any hope he had of remaining in East Asia, upon his retirement.  Never the less, he was a groundbreaker and deserves attention due to such men.  I hope to soon add much more to the article, when time and resources allow. RebelAt 06:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, according to the page for Antonio Riva, who was involved in the plot, Barrett had been a neighbor who had moved away a year earlier.  It also states that Zhou Enlai apologized to Barrett for the initial accusations  A quick bit of research revealed support for this, the apology to Barrett, in Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Great Power, 1850 to the Present by Jonathan Fenby.  Any present day allegations apparently fail to take into account the CCPs own reversal on the charges.~ (The Rebel At) ~ 21:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I put in a lot of information just recently, complete with notations.  However, it'll need significant trimming to be more appropiate for article quality.  I plan to do this as soon as I've the time, but for whomever is wandering through, feel free to go at it.RebelAt 16:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent update

message: This man was centrally involved in a 1950 plot to bombard Tiananmen Square with a mortar attack during National Day.  Odd how this has just been forgotten about. Laomei (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, according to the page for Antonio Riva, who was involved in the plot, Barrett had been a neighbor who had moved away a year earlier.  It also states that Zhou Enlai apologized to Barrett for the initial accusations  A quick bit of research revealed support for this, the apology to Barrett, in Modern China: The Fall and Rise of a Great Power, 1850 to the Present by Jonathan Fenby.  Any present day allegations apparently fail to take into account the CCPs own reversal on the charges.~ (The Rebel At) ~ 21:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite Needed
Talk:FC Partizan Minsk

message: Some more points:
*The squad section needs squad numbers.
*Is the UEFA Cup 2005-06 section necessary to include?
Punkmorten 15:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Red eye (medicine)

message: The following information was moved here from the article The Red Eye. It appears to be someone's lecture notes, so I have not incorporated into this article. Edwardian 07:14, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Red Eye

message: Is a reference to orbital cellulitis appropriate or needed? --Mdscottis (talk) 00:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orbital cellulitis 

message: I'm reasonably familiar with medical terminology but this article is so brief and technical that I had trouble figuring out what everything means.  "Corneal abnormalities including edema or opacities."  What does this mean??  The mention of Ophthalmology in the first paragraph would also be a good idea. Risssa (talk) 02:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please rewrite this! 

message: ... on the clinical assessment: doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.026 JFW | T@lk 22:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematic review 

message: It would have been nice to read this article without the horrific jump-scare image at the top... are there any guidelines about this on wikipedia? -- SocioCogLing (talk) 06:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the images guideline MOS:IMAGES says that images should meet "conventional expectations of readers". —Jade Ten (talk) 20:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top image
Talk:Monk Bretton

message: Why was my last edit removed? I added further relevant information only to be told it was 'not constructive'. 
You know, I contributed most of the information this page, is none of that 'constructive' either? Why not just revert the page back to the nearly blank state it was in when I first found it? I don't think I'll bother making any further edits in future anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.21.27 (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Office Open XML

message: Is it true, that VSDX is also an OOXML format? Shouldn't it be listed in the article then? --johayek (talk) 09:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Visio, e.g. VSDX 

message: I propose a criticism section.
Potential sources:
Family Guy Guy (talk) 13:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:World Net Daily controversy

message: This information was availble with World Net Daily, but an editor has repeatedly deleted the information. To avoid that this was created. Nonetheless, a merge would make sense, but something would have to be done about the content being deleted from the main article.
*I agree that this should be part of the main article.  What can be done to keep it from being deleted?  Locking the main article doesn't seem like a good idea. Anthopos 15:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article was available on main article
Talk:Igor Ivanov (chess player)

message: I changed the cause of death from "testicular cancer" to just "cancer".  This article in the St. George Spectrum says "brain cancer".   And this web page says "esophageal cancer" .
I disagree with the change in name from Igor V. Ivanov to Igor Vasilyevich Ivanov. If people want to look at this page, they will be able to remember Igor V. Ivanov,  but they will not be able to remember the name Igor Vasilyevich Ivanov. The "V." was added by me to Igor V. Ivanov to distinguish him from several other people also named Igor Ivanov. Sam Sloan 14:14, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I added two references, but there are still are a few facts in the article I could not find with a google search. I added citeneeded tags; please replace them with citations to place where these sources might be found. 
Also, link to FIDE ratings card doesn't work.  -- Pierremenard 02:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 

message: What happened to Igor's wife, Elizabeth?  GrandMattster 20:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Elizabeth Ivanov
Talk:Rush Hour (1998 film)

message: Should there be a spoiler warning? The plot isn't really giving any details away... Kareeser 08:07, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler warning 

message: Heard this was the highest grossing film in the U.S. without a white lead up to that point in time. Can anyone confirm? Quacks Like a Duck 04:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record? 

message: The actor list doesnt even state that Jet Li was in this film.
He was and he played juntao and was shot, while the american/english dude falls from teh ceiling
can somebody second me on this?
80.6.206.45 02:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refrain from personal attacks. Calling someone a "damn moron" because of a rather minor mistake is not exactly polite. — Cinemaniac (talk) 00:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alot of this is wrong 

message: Xinbenlv (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, but it took them years to agree on the script, and setting a schedule will probably take them a while too. It isn't even in production yet so best to avoid speculation as much as possible. -- 109.79.176.69 (talk) 19:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention Rush Hour 4? 

message: * 
Jackie Chan didn't like the film. I think it would be a good idea to include some or all of this quote in the article. -- 109.78.246.240 (talk) 15:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to the article. Other sources too, he has said the same thing various times over the years. He clearly prefers to do things his own way, but also I think he says a lot of these things to manage the expectations of his Chinese fans who expect different things from his films. -- 109.79.176.69 (talk) 19:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jackie Chan 

message: The creation of Rotten Tomatoes is an interesting note but it simply isn't "Critical response" and should be anywhere else to make room for reviews. I've moved it to a different section "Cultural influence" for now but I don't mind what that section is called if anyone wants to rename it. I want to have room to include more reviews in the critical response section. It's strange to say the article for Rush Hour 3 is better quality than this article. -- 109.79.176.69 (talk) 03:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rotten Tomatoes 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Rush Hour film. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 8#Rush Hour film until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Kailash29792 (talk)  15:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rush Hour film" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Shouldn't she be listed as a part of the cast?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:442:C280:ABC0:AD59:6617:2F88:C997 (talk) 23:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who played Soo Yung? 

message: It would be best to put "buddy cop action comedy film" rather than "buddy action comedy film" since the main characters are cops. Nathanlong3010 (talk) 03:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  add "cop" between "buddy" and "action
Talk:Trannyshack

message: I've just made an attempt at purging the peacocks from this article, and I think it's at a point where removal of the corresponding template is justified. If you find something I missed, please make an attempt at fixing it before reinstating the template.
Thanks! Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock terms removed/revised
Talk:Microcosm Publishing

message: -- Enochlau 08:48, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I think this article needs an update since Microcosm moved to Bloomington, Indiana. I'll try to write a good one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.197.169.6 (talk) 04:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPDATE 

message: Not sure about correct wording to describe current status of distro. Article includes "In August 2012, the organization split into two separate businesses: Microcosm Distribution, ... and Microcosm Publishing,". Now it looks like the distro has changed name to Pioneers Press and parted completely from Microcosm. microcosmdistribution.com now redirects to pioneerspress.com. PP's about webpage says “We operated temporarily under the name "Microcosm Distribution" but dropped the name as it gave the false impression that we were still associated in some way with Microcosm Publishing. We no longer carry any Microcosm Publishing titles or support the company or its owner in any way.” --EarthFurst (talk) 23:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  distro now Pioneers Press 
Talk:Sitiveni Rabuka

message: This page needs to be updated to cover his arrest this month in relation to the 2000 coup (Rabuka faces court for deadly mutiny in 2000 - http://origin.theaustralian.news.com.au/wireless/story/0,8262,4-19118606,00.html)
Moce.
Hi there!  You (Xorkl000) said that Rabuka never represented the Cakaudrove East Fijian Communal constituency.  Could you clarify what constituency he did represent?  Thanks! David Cannon 08:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The biography, Rabuka No Other Way (Eddie Dean and Stan Ritova) says: "Rabuka was born on September 13, 1948, in a typical 'bure' (thatched Fijian hut), overlooking Nakobo Village, on the south coast of the island of Vanua Levu. ... The infant Rabuka, like his contemporaries, was delivered in Nakobo Village ..." (page 20).  The page goes on to say, however, that Drekeniwai is his home village. David Cannon 21:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native of Nakobo? 

message: Rabuka recieved the French Medal of Honour also in his military career perhaps someone should add this to the article.
MB 19:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The French

message: Due to the seemingly Rambo style of his first coup, headlines referred to him as Rambo Rabuka and even Rambuka.  This nickname became so popular that many mistakenly beleived that it was his real name.  Be nice to see this information added to the article.
203.87.29.207 (talk) 22:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname Rambuka 
Talk:Zurab Azmaiparashvili

message: Nothing on Azmai's famous move retraction? Billbrock 09:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Herald (Glasgow)

message: Could somebody clarify this:
It is worthy of mention that the Herald's current stance of charging for archive accesses prejudices substantiating many Wikipedia items solely covered by the newspaper and relevant to predominately Glasgow or Scotland. JesseHogan 02:02, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: "It is Scotland's best-selling broadsheet", would appear to be false. The link to ABC confirms that the Press & Journal has Total Average Net Circulation Per Issue of 84,137 and the Dundee Courier with 79,945. And that The Herald has Total Average Net Circulation Per Issue of 71,686. It could be an honest mistake as The Herald has more national coverage than the P&J and Courier, or that the "Voice of the North" does not publish it's Saturday edition as a broadsheet. However I feel that this could be brand promotion on Wikipedia and therefore this line should be deleted and replaced with the facts. Anyone disagree? Benson85 20:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I am aware, The Herald is truly national while the P&J as well as the Courier are only distributed throughout the north-east.  Therefore this would mean that it probably is Scotland's best selling national broadsheet, as that would make it the only actual broadsheet with nationwide circulation. I won't declare this as fact, but certainly believe with good intentions that this is the case. 86.135.61.8 18:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circulation