lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ed Barrow

message: I will do this in the near future. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure about this baseball team in Des Moines, need more info. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: For use in expanding this article

message: Don't have time to a full GA review right now, but after reading some of this article for the heck of it, I noticed the refs are rather iffy. Namely, about half just show google archive search, rather than a title, date, etc. They should be done the same way as any other newspaper reference. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Shit, fallen behind on that. I'll fix it this week. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

text: All fixed. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref issue 

message: Although the statement that Barrow and Ruth had never gotten along is accurate, according to writer Tom Meany, Barrow helped Ruth manage his financial affairs early on and establish a relationship with the Christy Walsh syndicate, whereby Walsh became Ruth's business manager and kept Ruth from frittering away every dollar he earned. 96.234.201.180 (talk) 02:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Yankees
Talk:Philippa Fawcett

message: 71.114.183.105 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 21:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It would be nice if her exam could be published

message: The third paragraph under Career has "LCCrank" as a link to London_County_Council.  Is there a missing space here or is it something else?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.195.44 (talk) 17:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The text has been amended to eliminate the reference to LCCrank. A reference is needed to claim she "had the highest LCC rank ever for a woman."Rgdboer (talk) 20:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is LCCrank 

message: Wasn't she a relative of John_Edensor_Littlewood?
Meltingpot (talk) 22:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eminent relative
Talk:Malcolm Gordon (ice hockey)

message: , any objection to me switching your cites to cite templates? If so, I can switch the cite I just added to match yours. — Strongjam (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: NP -- the aim was to fully show notability.Collect (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Style
Talk:PBS Kids Go!

message: Who said that the PBS KIDS GO channel launched on December 11, 2006? I don't know because I haven't found any details on the Internet about it or its future plans...
You are obsessed with a kid's show.
That statement above is true. I have not seen anything about the new channel except that it may come later. Whoever added the comment above should put the ~ mark 4 times. PKGO 20:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Show us What You've got is a show from PBS KIDS GO! It's 1 min. and is after shows.  (70.107.146.211 12:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Show 

message: Like PBS KIDS, can we do what we do with the programing section? 70.107.150.42 (talk) 23:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PBS KIDS 

message: Since when is this on PBS Kids Go!?  I know that it airs on KEWLopolis, but not on PBS Kids Go!  If it did, it would have a page on http://pbskids.org/everything.html.  I don't see that page on here, so, I don't think that it is on the PBS Kids Go! block.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.12.224 (talk) 03:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Care Bears Adventure in Care a Lot 

message: Those are format PBS programs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.232.201 (talk) 00:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about ''The Magic School Bus'' and ''Wishbone''? 

message: Does anybody know why there are multiple listings for WordGirl, Wild Kratts, and so on? Don't these count as individual shows? There's no clear reason to me why (for example) "WordGirl: Tobey's Trick or Treats" or "Oh, Holiday Cheese" is included here as it appears to be a regular episode. My concern is that episodes are being added indiscriminately when nothing particularly noteworthy about them. Is it because they are holiday-themed? Also, there is only one reference for the entire article, which means the list does not meet with WP:V. How do we verify that Wild Kratts: Predator Week #1 actually aired from October 17 - 20, 2011?  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WordGirl, Wild Kratts, etc 

message: Incorrect dates for PBS Kids Go! is all wrong. It aired on 2004, not 2007. And it ended on 2013, not 2014 or 16. MilesAxlerod862 (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 July 2022 

message: Someone messing around with PBS Kids Go! Can you protect it please? MilesAxlerod862 (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 July 2022 

message: Would Webonauts fall under the "web series" category, or was it not affiliated with PBS Kids GO! to begin with? I want to add it, but I don't know how accurate it would be Triviatronic9000 (talk) 03:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on Webonauts
Talk:Mother Hubbard dress

message: The "Mother Hubbard" dress was loose at the waist (as can be seen in the photograph), and worn without corsets, so it was to some degree a compromise, or a watered-down version of full European styles. AnonMoos (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See :File:Mrs. Dyer and Princess Ofa.jpg for a contrast between a western woman wearing a fitted dress and an islander wearing a "Mother Hubbard"... AnonMoos (talk) 15:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mother Hubbard dress vs. contemporary European women's fashions
Talk:Fort Bovisand

message: Since January 2008, this article has had a tag asking for citations for verification. I tried to make it halfway decent, but it gets reverted by User:Anthony Appleyard who has asked "Which parts are POV?". Without cites from independent sources, the following claims are POV/advertisement/unsubstantiated - 
# "purpose-built reservoir"
# in 1957 the MOD "had abandoned the fort"
# "an important national commercial diving school"
# "got into difficulties"
# "severe disagreements among its management"
# "had a world-wide reputation"
# "owners obtained a court order for possession and changed the locks and evicted the remaining diving etc firms trading there"
# "Greg Dyke...... owned Fort Bovisand and had plans to set up a new business there" (no mention of this in his own article)
etc. The article had a lot of irrelevant fluff too, which I have removed.
Info/dates regarding the guns need cites too. Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 21:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is POV?
Talk:Chief Hunter Jack

message: Not all readers are familiar with the place-names given in the article.  A knowledgeable editor should add more location information, such as, at least, what country the man lived in.  J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 16:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location?
Talk:Royal Citadel, Plymouth

message: Should have some more detail of what the current use is. Is it a navy or army base?
-- Harry Wood (talk) 13:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current use 
Portal talk:BBC

message: I was wondering if perhaps a new section could fit into the space between the others on the portal - perhaps one showcasing BBC buildings? Wikiwoohoo (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, however there are a few that appear in the selected picture section and duplication should be avoided. mattbr 10:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, made mostly from the existing selected picture entries which I have replaced with other images. mattbr 14:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section? 

message: Please if you have time and you know anything to it, please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 15:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Audio theatre]] an article to audio dramas 

message: I am currently restructuring the BBC section of Wikipedia - If you can see how to make the BBC category more understandable to the average reader please do! Mindi Crayon (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category restructuring  

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018.
Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, and design the portals of the future.
As of April 29th, membership is at 56 editors, and growing.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for each component of portals.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject.      — The Transhumanist    03:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status report from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]]
Talk:Ware Tetralogy

message: Contrary to what it currently says at the end of the section on Realware, I did not "undergo a religious conversion" during this time period, and I hope someone corrects this in an edit---I'd prefer to avoid editing my own entries myself, although I have occasionally added things to my bio note on Wikepedia.
If you read closely, you can see that my religious beliefs have been more or less the same in all my novels---a form of mysticism which I'd adopted by the time I was in my early 20s.
On another topic: A point could be made that the Wares follow a continuous thread of riffing on the notion of what a "soul" might be: from a digital information pattern, to an organic DNA-like pattern, to an interstellar electromagnetic signal, to a simple physical object.Rudyrucker (talk) 15:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Religious Conversion
Talk:Bluff (magazine)

message: I removed the PROD placed by another author, and added a reference from another source. I agree that the article needs work, but it's hard to justify deletion of an article about the highest-circulation poker magazine. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed PROD 
Talk:Cornette

message: The main article could be improved if there were a couple paragraphs on how to fold a cornette from a square of starched white linen or canvas.
When I looked at some pictures of cornettes, it appears there are several different ways of folding a square or rectangle into the desired headgear.  216.99.201.108 (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to fold a cornette
Talk:Translunar injection

message: Wouldn't this artical be better placed in the Wiktionary Shoessss 19:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this a person/band/company/webcontent?? NickelShoe (Talk) 20:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Possibly. I saw this empty article linked from the article on the J-2X engine and decided to create a stub. There's a lot more that could be talked about, but I don't really have the time to do that at the moment. Sections on techniques and various transfer orbits, engines required for it, etc., could be created, to expand it well beyond the dictionary definition. Malderi 21:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know you can remove the prod tag, right? NickelShoe (Talk) 22:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I'm new to creating articles. As the author, can I remove the tag?Malderi 06:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For WP:PROD, yes.  Not for WP:CSD or WP:AFD.  Yes, I know it's confusing for new users. You just have to read the tag.  This one says if you disagree to remove the tag. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wiktionary 

message: Shouldn't this be redirected to Trans Lunar Injection? - 66.222.18.102 18:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: This article, and Trans Lunar Injection, should probably be merged. (sdsds - talk) 05:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should, the proper usage is Trans Lunar as two distinct words.  The Trans Lunar Injection article is more fleshed out and is sourced.--Abebenjoe 17:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Here's an example (from NASA) that uses Translunar Injection. There are plenty of others. I imagine because of the acronym TLI there are plenty that use Trans Lunar Injection. Does anyone know a way to determine which should be preferred? (sdsds - talk) 23:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes.  Merge them; to Translunar Injection.  A Google search says Translunar Injection has greater usage by 8250 to 5560. On nasa.gov it is 3500 to 277.  Also, FWIW, in my experience in the aerospace industry it is always Translunar Injection.  Wayne Goode 19:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Universidade Aberta

message: Is "Aberta University" used as a name? If not it should surely be at either Universidade Aberta or at Open University (Portugal).
OOPS forgot to signA Geek Tragedy 13:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Social organization

message: Hello! As a part of my sociology class, I was assigned to choose a Wikipedia page in which I would try to improve with the resources available through my university. When seeing the page, I saw that it was very bare and I would love to keep adding to the information and do some structural additions to the page.Mvale086 (talk) 19:49, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas to Improve

message: we should take a moment to evaluate the language links. this article talks about social structures, the one in portuguese, for instance, talks about a specific type of not for profit organization.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.112.185.143 (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  language links revision 

message: Regarding this portion of the article:
"Collectivist social organization refers to developing countries that bypasses formal institutions and rather rely on informal institutions to uphold contractual obligations. This organization relies on a horizontal social structure, stressing relationships within communities rather than a social hierarchy between them. This kind of system has been largely attributed to cultures with strong religious, ethnic, or familial group ties and has been used in reference to developing countries. Therefore, they have suffered from colonialist efforts to establish individualistic social organizations that contradict indigenous cultural values. This has negative implications for interactions between groups rather than within them.[citation needed]"
This is not what collectivist social organization refers to. Collectivist cultures can be, and often are, very hierarchal (therefore vertical, not horizontal). This type of social organization is also not unique to "developing countries". There are plenty of developed nations with elements of collectivism in their societies. Though some more collectivist developing countries have surely suffered from European colonialism, to suggest that individualism is imperial or western is just silly. Almost every society has elements of individualism and collectivism. This article, and this portion in particular, is in desperate need of editing and review. 2601:400:8000:4310:A122:38F5:7AB:EE78 (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Collectivism 

message: define social organisation Gollo Topu (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is done in the very first sentence of this article... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social organisation  

message: For concepts like "collectivist education" (see Anton Makarenko), or any other type of collectivism in the socialist meaning, the definition offered here is useless. And that's a huge field. I can see that there are other articles out there, but the link collectivist leads right to this page, to the "Collectivism and individualism" section, and that's at least technically wrong. Arminden (talk) 14:08, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-sided?
Talk:National University of Distance Education

message: I'm not sure translating the title is appropriate.  While the English version of the website translates the name, by convention any foreign "national" body is usually qualified with its nationality when refered to in an English speaking country -- eg "the Spanish National University of Distance Education".
I'd personally prefer to call the article UNED.  I've nothing against using the translation in the article itself, I just think UNED is a more appropriate title, as it's an internationally recognisable name.  Prof Wrong (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title...
Talk:Open University of Catalonia

message: Hi! Thanks for the article! This reference is provided to argue that UOC is a public institution. But the reference does not say that: http://www.uoc.edu/portal/en/universitat/coneix/faqs/sobre-universitat/index.html There is anything on the public character of the University at the reference. --Lilaroja (talk) 13:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Evangelical counsels

message: This article appears to me to be presenting the Catholic theology regarding particular teachings of Jesus. This is evidenced by two of the three references being explicitly Catholic sources. I question whether this should be made clearer, or even whether this page would be better placed in the category of articles related to Catholicism. Matt73 (talk) 05:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Other views should be added, citing Wikipedia:Reliable sources of course, as always. 75.15.195.94 (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic Viewpoint? 

message: Cutting this on the obvious ground that, no, not all Christians are called to the single life and to poverty.  And the obedience involved is above and beyond that which is required to the Church.
:Not only those wishing to dedicate their life to God in the consecrated life, but every one of Jesus's followers is invited to observe chastity, poverty and obedience, since he exhorted all to "be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (cf. ).
64.148.17.213 (talk) 03:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any Wikipedia:Reliable sources that claim all Christians should observe the evangelical counsels? If so, they should be added to the article. Otherwise, wikipedia policy is NOR. 75.15.195.94 (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: All Christians?
Talk:Television's Greatest Hits

message: The link for "The Little Rascals" takes us to the article about the 1980's cartoon, when the music from the collection is from the live-action short film series.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.67.34.71 (talk) 22:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Rascals link 

message: Although there are some original TV themes on these compilations, many of the songs are re-recordings. This should be mentioned in the article. —mjb (talk) 10:08, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-recordings
Talk:Central Alberta

message: The link to Reference 2 (population of the region as of 2004) is broken. Opendestiny (talk) 18:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link to reference
Talk:Renán Almendárez Coello

message: Anyone that can help sort this out please do.  It was reported on the news on 1/3/07 and now in print, but various versions of the events.ThanksTalkAbout 20:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Booking on incident 1/1/07

message: I just ran across this article and noticed right away that the introduction is very much in need of being reformatted to conform to the standard template for living people.  For example, the first sentence does not begin with the person's name and date of birth but is rather a personal promotion/endorsement of Coello's radio show. In addition, it contains unnecessary boldfaced text and is missing punctuation in some spots. DokoMadeMo (talk) 06:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article format
Talk:Adduct

message: I'm erasing the part in bold, that is incorrect. The example two lines below the sentence prove it.
An adduct (from the Latin adductus, "drawn toward") is a product of a direct addition of two or more distinct molecules, resulting in a single reaction product containing all atoms of all components, with formation of two chemical bonds and a net reduction in bond multiplicity in at least one of the reactants  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.109.1.15 (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of articles related to quackery

message: I the originator of the "List of articles related to quackery" herby amend my vote to change to move to project namespace ASAP.  This means the page must and will be blanked immediately and moved immediately. This statement overides the creation of the list and deletion process and the list must move within 72 hours to the project namespace at once so help me God. "I do." 
Signed (under penalty of law.): --QuackGuru 20:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite the declaration! However, we'll have to wait and see how the vote completes. Regardless of who created the page, no one has ownership of the article itself. I have a feeling that a move to project space is going to be the final decision, though, so it's a moot point. -- Kesh 20:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Originator

message: I amend the creation of the "List of articles related to quackery" and move to project namespace at once so bless me God. "I do." --QuackGuru 20:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Amendment

message: I have re-read the initial entry :Excellent Idea!" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_articles_related_to_quackery   and the more I read it more I think something is fishy here.  It is this quote that concerns me:
::"...but by following those editors' tracks, we might be able to find more. Just watch my edit history and you'll be able to figure out what was going on and who deleted the category tag. Then follow their tracks. If you will please activate your email, I'll email you the names to watch. Let me know on my user page. -- Fyslee 09:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''ALERT! ALERT!''' 

message: Ongoing comments by Steth is not assuming good faith. Steth has not helped in any way in improving the list. Seems odd to me. Has not added anything to the list. The only thing Steth has done is continued to be negetive. I smell it now a troll that is.
Please comment on improving the list and stop your strange behavior. --QuackGuru 17:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note regarding Steth 

message: I nominated this one (also create by QuackGuru) for deletion. Here is the article for deletion vote page... TheDoctorIsIn 19:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of people related to quackery or anti-quackery]] 

message: No doubt the AGF finger will be pointed by those who don't AGF, but it is worth noting that the vast majority of editors who have voted for a delete haven't actually edited an article in WP for some time but have contributed to many discussions.  Note that I'm not trying to suggest anything or point the finger at anybody or accuse any editor of being nefarious, I just find it odd, that's all.  Shot info 08:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a quick run through the editors and found one editor with several months gap and one new editor.  I don't really care about article vs Talk because that's how many professionals contribute and more common in mature articles.  I found the time & volume records pretty solid looking.--I'clast 16:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a note
Talk:Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison

message: Mention needs to be made of the Brobeck archive. Mathiastck 20:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)