lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Google LLC

message: I propose that this template into two separate ones because it's a bit uncomfortable to read now due to its big size. -- PK2 (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur it was too large; I have condensed it a bit to reduce size. The other alternative would be to use Template:Navbox with collapsible groups. Not sure splitting it would be beneficial. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 00:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: split this template into two 

message: Add Google Read Along in the services>others section. 103.67.157.156 (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 08:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2021 

message: Does anyone object to converting this navbox into a navbox with collapsible groups given its large size? If not, I will go ahead and make the switch. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BOLDly switched, feel free to revert my edit if anyone disagrees. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:54, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapsible format 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Google LLC →  – The reason I'm requesting for this template to be moved to the new title is to align it with its main article's name, because the legal status suffix of a company isn't normally included in the article's or its template's titles, per WP:NCCORP, and because I personally think that the word 'navbox' is sufficient enough to disamiguate this template from other templates like  or , per WP:TITLEDAB and WP:NATURAL. PK2 (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 March 2024
Talk:Raggedy Ann

message: Theres a huge void in the Article where this should be.12.71.182.66 (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define "Infected vaccination"
Talk:James Burrows

message: Why include the list of some series Burrows directed when there is also a filmography on the page? IMO, the list of series he directed has outlived its usefulness. Knope7 (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Series list 

message: The table of his non-acting credits is missing the 15 episodes of Friends he directed. I don't feel like messing with table formatting at the moment, but someone should fix this. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friends missing from table
Talk:Geomantic figures

message: The reason I ask: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Braille#Braille_.27the_world.27s_first_binary_character_encoding.27.3F Etaonsh 05:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just redirected all of the stubs back here and I think I got all the double redirects also. No one had previously worked on those stubs at all since March. If left as stubs, having their own pages, they would have been deleted. I added them here since there wasnt alot of info on this page either, but now there is. SynergeticMaggot 19:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old are geomantic figures? 

message: I'm not sure if it would be better or worse, but perhaps each figure could have bullets instead of paragraphs to describe them. Example:
Via (this would be the heading)
Name: Latin for "road"
Depicts/resembles: Road or path.
Fortune: Usually bad, but good with concerns of roads, travels, or journeys.
Outcome: Neutral, unless change by itself infers a positive or negative result.
Associated with: Cancer and Moon
Notes: All the elements in Via are active, and as such the figure indicates 'change' more than any other figure.
  X
  X
  X
  X
It might make things easier to read/edit. 24.126.199.129 08:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting suggestion

message: It looks like the meanings of "caput" and "cauda" are switched. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caput.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.99.55 (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cauda and caput 

message: Rehauled the page; got rid of the "need sources/citations/introductory style" tags, added graphics, charts, new links to other articles, a few sources, information about the figures themselves and the general structure of the figures, and the different manipulations one can apply to them,  The article itself doesn't contain citations, since I don't clearly know where to put them.  Please check over for style and content, but it's much much better than it was before.  As it stands, we may or may not want to still merge this with geomancy.  -Tascil March 10 2009 0406 EDT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tascil (talk • contribs) 08:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rehauled the page 

message: A music video is not a reliable source for this topic. Elizium23 (talk) 00:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A music video
Talk:Peter Blume

message: P Blume did a painting called "The Eternal City". Anyone know of one called "Rome the Eternal City". I saw it a the MOMA in 1974. It has Rome falling, and two people praying, one to a clown Christ, the other, dissatisfied, looking in to a dark archway where there is an extremely faint Christ.
MartinGugino 05:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rome the Eternal City
Talk:Inland port

message: Why was my wikify template removed? Appropriate Username 05:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: Says it all. Tabletop 12:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leave Inland Harbor alone. 

message: This page is simultaneously describing two distinct but related concepts while only differentiating between them by use of capitalization: inland port Vs Inland Port. It may be better to split this page up to avoid confusion.
66.108.243.166 (talk) 09:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is an "Ambiguation Page" 

message: What's the difference to a Inland harbor?--Kopiersperre (talk) 09:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port / Harbor 

message: --BonsMans1 (talk•contributions), 20:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vidin and Ruse? 

message: هي  مدرسة عليا متعددة  التخصصات يعيش  فيها   اكثر  من   ... 41.188.100.253 (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  المدرسة العليا 

message: The article lacks Astrakhan, Russia which is a port on Volga river and Atyrau, Kazakhstan which is a port on Ural river. Note that they aren't ports on the Caspian Sea because Astrakhan is above 50 miles away from it, and Atyrau is about 20 miles away.
Also, Atyrau perhaps is the only inland port which is located in two continents (Asia and Europe) because Ural river is the two continents' boundary. Aminabzz (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Astrakhan]] and [[Atyrau]] 

message: I think the article lacks many cities. For example, Van, Turkey is one of them. Aminabzz (talk) 22:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van and possibly more
Talk:Caulfield Racecourse

message: Commonly known as "the Heath"?
I've lived there for over 40 years and never heard this.
:Please check the following:
* Melbourne Racing Club
* Melbourne Racing Club
* Bonecrusher at the Heath 
* ABC sport
* Venue - Caulfield
Cuddy Wifter 06:51, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Spanish Translation of the Week/Vasco Núñez de Balboa

message: Wikipedia:Spanish Translation of the Week/Vasco Núñez de Balboa → Vasco Núñez de Balboa  : Translation work has been finished. Please review and comment : Schoeler 05:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add * Support or * Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, or add * followed by a comment, then sign your opinion with "~~~~"
*merge, don't move No paticular reason to displace existing text. Septentrionalis 01:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: If so, then WP:MM, not WP:RM. Also, this page's title is utterly incorrect: "Wikipedia talk:", not "Talk:Wikipedia:". —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 06:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: : Add * Support or * Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, or add * followed by a comment, then sign your opinion with "~~~~"
*merge, don't move No paticular reason to displace existing text. Septentrionalis 01:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If so, then WP:MM, not WP:RM. Also, this page's title is utterly incorrect: "Wikipedia talk:", not "Talk:Wikipedia:". —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 06:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey and discussion
Talk:Valine

message: Can we perhaps have more about the biological functions and reactions of Valine? I know that it has a role as a component of protein, but it has functions besides this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.119.242 (talk) 11:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current SMILES is:
:CC(C)C(N)COO
but shouldn't it be
:CC(C)C(N)C(=O)O
?  I'm going to go ahad and change it but revert if I'm mistaken. Cburnett 05:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES 

message: "Its use or purpose, however, is unknown, like most cigarette additives."
I don't think that's true; I think they use it for a well-known reason. Anyone know what it is? —Keenan Pepper 18:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do they put it in cigarettes? 

message: I removed the part that said "and is coded for in DNA" because it makes no sense.  DNA encodes genes, which direct protein synthesis.  DNA does not direct the synthesis of small molecules such as valine.
I am removing the part that claime beef is a good source of Valine.  As far as I know from literature on protein beef is not a signifiacant source of Valine, making it an incomplete protein as Valine is an essential amino acid.  --AspencerB 18:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: The article contains this single sentence: "It is named after the plant valerian."   Any idea WHY it is named after the valerian plant?   --98.70.142.237 (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  named after the plant valerian. 

message: Please help me 67.160.98.99 (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can valine deficiency cause death?
Talk:Leap of faith (disambiguation)

message: I re-wrote the definition of the skateboarding "Leap of Faith", but can't figure out a way that sounds pleasing without being too wordy.  It's not just skateboarders who refer to it as the Leap of Faith, but I don't want to use the label "extreme sports" or "action sports" to describe the individuals who would know about this location... if anyone else can think of a way to word it better, go ahead. --Nichenbach 05:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Castlemaine Perkins

message: I do not believe that this page should be merged with XXXX. This article is about the actual brewery located in Milton, Brisbane and discusses the location and history of the site. The XXXX article is about the company. I have removed the merge template as it has been there for 3 months.    Rimmeraj 05:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge With XXXX

message: Instead of merging, should this article be renamed to signify that it is about the landmark / location of the brewery, not the company.
:who will be the one brave enough to mention the distinctive smell that the brewery lets loose in the Milton area? 203.14.156.192 01:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any press/media regarding this? --Mikecraig 01:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just the smell of malt produced during sparging and the subsequent boil of each wort.  Any brewery smells the same.  No press that I've seen, just a notable feature of living in the surrounding area.  On a seperate note, if the list of beers is meant to be a list of beers actually still brewed at the brewery, arent Carbine Stout and a few other non-fourex branded beers brewed there?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.142.203 (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: I think many people (particularly younger people) won't recognise the Castlemain Perkins name and, in any case, CP no longer own it. Alo the brewery's own website call it XXXX Brewery and XXXX Alehouse (apart from the COVID notices where they spell it with only 3 Xs but I think that's a typo!) Obviously the CP name should be include as a historic alternativ name. What do others think? Kerry (talk) 09:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename as [[XXXX brewery]]
Talk:Laurel Falls Trail

message: Found the falls on google maps at loc: 35.6855,-83.5365. Rwflammang (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Yo 
the synopsis sounds kind of opinionated.Skullovitch (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinons
Talk:Waxahachie, Texas

message: Just FYI--eight cities' (in additon to Waxahachie's) 2000 census data was used.  The following cities I considered are "metro" to Waxahachie are:  Pecan Hill, TX, Oak Leaf, TX, Red Oak, TX, Ovilla, TX, Glenn Heights, TX, Midlothian, TX, Maypearl, TX, and Palmer, TX.  These cities are all within a 12.5 mi radius. -therearenospoons 05:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox:  Cities used in "[[United States metropolitan area|metro area]]" calculation 

message: When looking at other cities pages you will see the seal and occasionally the flag of the city, there isn’t a flag of Waxahachie but there is a seal, so where is it? KingWestin77 (talk) 00:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seal of Waxahachie
Talk:Knowledge process outsourcing

message: knowledge proces outsourcing in ites
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.71.153.66 (talk • contribs) 
provide domain-based processes ... enables KPO by treating all functions as services ... large knowledge pool and a significant cost arbitrage. You know what would be good? It would be good if someone translated this article into English. --Rbreen (talk) 13:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: There is a proposed merge to business process outsourcing. I would support that merge.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to BPO
Talk:Josh Smith

message: Mid-range shawty redirects here but isn't mentioned anywhere in the article. Generally redirects from nicknames are only useful if the nickname is well-known or significant enough to merit a mention in the article; can such a mention be added in this case or should the redirect go to WP:RFD? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I dont see it at https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/smithjo03.html, which usually is pretty generous about putting obscure ones.  RfD seems reasonable. —Bagumba (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  That said, there are sources on Google. All depends what one considers WP:FANCRUFT. It's not a common nickname of his.—Bagumba (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Bagumba. I'll give it a few more days and see if anyone else has any thoughts. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Belatedly RFD'd; see below. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mid-range shawty]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Mid-range shawty. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 16#Mid-range shawty until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mid-range shawty" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Handspring (gymnastics)

message: There is an existing stub Flic flac, which doesn't present more information, than the "Back handspring" section of this article. I suggest either to remove all the information and redirect ff to this article; or rename ff article to "back handspring" and move all related information from this article there. Cmapm 05:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've implemented the first variant. If the second one or some other way is preferrable, say this here, please, or implement it yourself. Cmapm 08:58, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: added some technical info .... good to see someone doing a gymnastics technique section. (olive 02:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed the link to "Drills and exercises for learning front and back handsprings" because it appears to violate two primary tenets of Wikipedia's guidelines for external links. To wit:
* The target site is purely a "howto," so it doesn't provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article.
* The target site is loaded with links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to sites with objectionable amounts of advertising.
After removing the link, user 24.93.135.96 immediately added it back into the article. I don't want to start an edit war here and it's possible I have misjudged the value of the link. Can a disinterested party give a second opinion here, please?
Lambtron (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The same dubious link was recently added again, and was again reverted. Second opinions? Lambtron (talk) 13:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Thanks! The new Cheerleading section does appear to contain useful information, though its good to back up statements with references when possible. When deciding what info to add, keep in mind that visitors want to know things like what a handspring is and why it's notable. For example, why is the ability to perform a handspring a prized skill? Also, you mention All-Star cheerleading and the United States All Star Federation; what are these and why are they important? Are there already articles about these topics (in which case you may want to link to them here) or should you perhaps create these new articles yourself? If such articles already exist, it's usually best to put minimal info here and just link to the articles to avoid redundancy. BTW, you can create a username for yourself with minimal effort; this will benefit you in various ways if you will be doing more editing (which is encouraged!). Lambtron (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links: spam?
Talk:Civic United Front

message: Is this really still a stub? It seems long enough to escape stub-dom to me. Useless Fodder 05:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jarmann M1884/Archive 1

message: ===Muzzle velocity and recoil of M28===
The M28 must had a hell of a recoil; from the advertisment we know that the M28 weighted 5.3 kg unloaded, and 7.7 kg when loaded with a rescue harpoon. It's easy to calculate (with the formula R=v0²sin2a/g) that the 2.4 kg harpoon must had a muzzle velocity of at least 31.3 m/s to reach the range of 100 meters stated in the advertisment. And since there is an equal and opposite reaction to every reaction, it means that the M28 must have moved backwards with a speed of:
2.4kg * 31.3m/s = 5.3kg * ?m/s > ? = 14,17 m/s
In other words, a pretty good kick.
===Recoil of M1884===
The muzzle velocity of the M1884 is given in the references as between 485 m/s and 500 m/s. Since it's known that the projectile weighted about 21.85g, it's easy to figure out that the recoil is between:
0.002185kg * 485 m/s = 4,5kg * ?m/s > ? = 0.235 m/s
and
0.002185kg * 500 m/s = 4,5kg * ?m/s > ? = 0.243 m/s
In other words, about the same as most modern rifles.
===Formula used===
R=v0²sin2a/g
R = Range
v0 = muzzle velocity
a = angle; for maximum range, this should be 45°
:sin2a = the sin-value of _twice_ the angle. For maximum range, this should be 45°, so sin(2*45°) = 1
g = the acceleration of gravity = 9,81 m/s²
WegianWarrior 08:29, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recoil, muzzle velocity and suchlike

message: R=v0²sin2a/g
R = Range
v0 = muzzle velocity
a = angle; for maximum range, this should be 45°
:sin2a = the sin-value of _twice_ the angle. For maximum range, this should be 45°, so sin(2*45°) = 1
g = the acceleration of gravity = 9,81 m/s²
WegianWarrior 08:29, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula used
Talk:Cullen Jenkins

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cullen Jenkins.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD discussion 
Talk:Ponce massacre

message: It looks better than what was previously described, but it still is very light on source material (only one source for the article.) Additionally the article could use some fact-based expansion of the material to read more like an encyclopedic entry. To me it seems to be a series of poorly documented bullet statements at the beginning and also needs little corrections such as stating a person's full name before referring to them by title and surname only.
137.3.122.49 (talk) 19:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Reply 

message: This file is being considered for deletion here. --Jmundo (talk) 03:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Ponce Massacre.JPG 

message: Per WP:OR and WP:OR, sources must be cited: sourced material had been removed and replaced with unsourced text. Per WP:AGF, if any material is questioned, simply tag it with a CN tag and allow reasonable time for other editors to provide citations. Simply replacing text with unsourced text doesn't help anyone, particularly if the material is disputed. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 05:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits by Parkwells

message: Appropriate and fully sourced material, with citations provided, was recently deleted from this article without any notice or prior discussion on this talk page. This material was reinstated. 
Please refrain from wholesale and massive editing, that is not preceded by at least a minimum of discussion on this page. Sarason (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: More recent edits without prior discussion
Talk:Hammond

message: The people named hammond link doesn't work, it brings up people named Hamm.
Might as well include the fictional Hector Hammond, unless hypercephaletic supervillains are unwelcome.
I cant edit the canadian cities.
I want to add Hammond, Ontario, Canada.
This etymology is totally wrong. See Reaney and Wilson, A Dictionary of English Surnames.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.236.203 (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Decretum Gratiani

message: "...sometimes mistakenly called the Concordantia discordantium canonum" How confident are we that this is actually a mistake?
Peter Stein refers to the document in this way in 'Roman Law in European History' pg 49.
This spelling is also used in 'A History of Private Law in Europe' by Franz Wieacker in the English Translation by Tony Weir, pg 49.
Although neither of the authors are canon law specialists, they are formidable academics. Mrheathcliff 05:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake 

message: I'm not sure how to include this, but we ought to include something about his theories of marriage (ie, matrimonium initiatum and matrimonium ratum) here.  Got any suggestions about where it should be included in the article?  The Jade Knight 06:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gratian and marriage 

message: CIC was in force until 1918.  Benedict promulaged teh code in 1917, but it did not have legally binding force until Pentacost 1918.DaveTroy 19:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  check the promulagation 

message: The article Corpus Juris Canonici is a general article, and it had way too much info on the Decretum. I left a nice intro section there, but moved the rest here.  Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 00:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Transferred Text from [[Corpus Juris Canonici]]