lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cornish kilts and tartans

message: I merged Cornish national tartan into this page. Much of the material was duplicated already; there doesn't seem to me to be a need for two separate pages. Terraxos 02:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article may have the wrong image for STA no. 1262. Aqchampion (talk) 08:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. the "Cornish National Day" entry is just showing a lightened blowup of "Cornish National". The correct tartan can be found here.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Error
Talk:Sonority sequencing principle

message: I'm pretty sure modern Hebrew allows for a bit more than a sonority plateau, as both plosive-fricative and fricative-plosive onsets are allowed (e.g. קשורה /kʃura/ and שקיעה /ʃki?a/). It does seems just for sibilants tho. 46.19.85.245 (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Hebrew
Talk:BMW M21

message: Was this engine really introduced in 1986? The list of BMW engines page says it was introduced in 1983, and I also believe this was the engine offered in the 1984-85 Lincoln Continentals. --Sable232 19:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: Sable232, Why do you repeat that Lincoln Continental and Lincoln Continental Mk.7 are different cars ???  This is the same car !!!  Why mention him again.  I will block you !!! Аdd a normal links!!! Tsikhotskyi19 (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what you're babbling about in terms of "add a normal links!!!" but if you'd check the links that are there for both entries, they go to different articles because they are not the same car. --Sable232 (talk) 15:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  M21 engine on Lincoln Continental 

message: 1984 - 1985 Continental Mark VII[9]
1984 - 1985 Lincoln Continental[9]
SAME CAR. TWO NAMES OF ONE CAR!!! Sable232, Learn HISTORY OF CAR BUILDING!!! Tsikhotskyi19 (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeating
Talk:Bounce Address Tag Validation

message: The "BATV draft" link is broken. -- abfackeln 19:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: good point about the I-D being expired, but I think the "not accepted" gives the wrong impression.  "has not been pushed through the publication process" is probably more accurate, but I've just changed it to note that the I-D is expired. Wrs1864 (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Shariff Kabunsuan

message: Somebody has to remove Cotabato City from the locator map. --Howard the Duck 16:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:Suffield, Connecticut

message: Meh, if I can snitch my moms digital camera, I can get some pics. Blastedt•(talk•contribs) 19:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics

message: For such a small town, Suffield has a long and distinguished history. Would love to see some substantial history posted here.MarmadukePercy (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be fabulous if a local wikipedian might take a photo of either the King House Museum or the Hatheway House to adorn this page.MarmadukePercy (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I am suprised. There is no mention of the John F. Kennedy Memorial Library, or the war memorial next ot it. Could anyone ut those in? I don't have enough time to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aero-Plex (talk • contribs) 02:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Other
Talk:Economy of Trinidad and Tobago

message: The Iron and Steel Company of Trinidad and Tobago (ISCOTT) was privatised many years ago. It was bought by the Mittal family and is now called Mittal Steel Point Lisas.
Bernd neuenkirchen,
Houston
Currently Trinidad and Tobago is going through an financial crisis, the largest corporation CLICO is insolvent, the full extent of the liabilities remain unclear and the impact this will have on the overall economy is material and exceeds 50% of Governments annual expenditure.
http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,128558.html
http://www.trinidadandtobagonews.com/blog/?p=924
http://guardian.co.tt/news/general/2009/07/26/631m-clico-pay-out-due-begin-friday  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.213.35.8 (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

message: I propose that The Energy Sector and the Trinidad and Tobago Economy be merged into Economy of Trinidad and Tobago and as was suggested in April 2012. I think that the content in the The Energy Sector and the Trinidad and Tobago Economy article can easily be explained in the context of Economy of Trinidad and Tobago, and the Economy of Trinidad and Tobago article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of The Energy Sector and the Trinidad and Tobago Economy will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Anirsa10 (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Buzen's algorithm

message: I haven't had time to finish this article, and I likely won't.  There are almost certainly large factual errors in it, so I've added a verify template.  John Reed Riley 19:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have fixed up this Wikipedia entry, adhering closely to the published Buzen article (available online).  At this point I think it is complete and mathematically accurate.
One shortcoming of this version: it only covers the pure exponential server case; if someone would like to discuss how the algorithm changes for load-dependent servers, please add that discussion back. Encyclops (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2009: major revamp
Talk:Battle of the Border

message: I'd assume there are other battles of the border and this name will eventually became a disambig while the article is moved to Battle of the Border (Poland). Until such a disambig is created, I think this is an acceptable title. PS. It appears the name is virtually unused in English historiography, but since it's used in Polish I think it's a good name for an article about the opening phase of the Invasion.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Failed due to insufficient citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:Great Indian Warpath

message: James Mooney, John Ramsey, and C.C. Royce, the acknowleged early experts on social scientific study of Native American Indians all referred to this aboriginal "highway" as the Great Indian Warpath.  John R. Swanton, who did likewise, also produced a map of the major Indian trails in the eastern U.S. which also clearly shows the GIW and the "Warriors' Path" to be completely separate and indeed perpendicular entities.
The sources of information about the route of the GIW from Guntersville to the Overhill country are numerous old maps of the locale from the nineteenth century, local historical accounts, and knowledge of the physical geography of the area.
:If I get a chance I'll make an overview map.  Already have a decent base map that could be used for it.  Could try to put several trails on it.  If I find the time anyway.  I like historical geography. Pfly 22:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This article and Great Trail seem to be in contradiction as to which is a subset of the other.  This should all be rather clarified.--Pharos (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subset or superset of [[Great Trail]]?
Talk:Prime Minister of Malta

message: 2  Francesco Buhagiar  1923  1924  Popular Union
3  Ugo Pasquale Mifsud, 1st time  1923  1927  Nationalist Party
???
:Seems to be an error — I've corrected it. Thanks for spotting it. -- Vardion 04:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Simultaneous prime minister? 
Talk:Horizon effect

message: I approve of merging, the two pages discuss the same phenomenon.Bouke 19:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I’m having trouble parsing this sentence:
“Beside obligatory quiescence search, extensions, specially check extensions are designed to reduce horizon effects.”
The only way I can make sense of it is the following:
“BesideS the obligatory quiescence search, extensions, Especially check extensions, are designed to reduce horizon effects.”
I’m not going to make changes based on supposition, however. Jd.varner44 (talk) 19:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am tempted to revert the article to the version of . The lead section was far from perfect then but I think it was better than what we have now. – Tea2min (talk) 09:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  End sentence of first paragraph
Talk:Wisconsin State Universities

message: Great content! It needs to be tidied up a bit to match the Manual of Style, but an excellent start. Andrewa 19:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should be moved to Wisconsin State Universities to conform to the principle of least astonishment. Miaers 15:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed; I'm glad to see you've already done it, Miaers. Thanx. --Orange Mike 00:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of Style and Article Name 

message: I am restoring the deleted material about resistance, as the information is not POV. I've been reading newspapers from the period, and there was genuine opposition out of Madison to the merger, by people who claimed that such a merger would cause "brand dilution" (as the marketing people say nowadays) of the prestigious UW name. By and large, incidentally, this was the same argument that was used to argue against the naming of UWM in 1956: no other institution should be called UW-anything, because that would damage the prestige of the place in Madison, center of the intellectual universe in Wisconsin. {Yep, that remark is POV; I'm in the Talk page!).--Orange Mike 00:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is definitely someone's POV. At least it is not the majority view. Otherwise UW System wouldn't came into being. I don't think UW's prestige had been damaged in any way by the merger. Instead, it had made it better. Your wording is basically promoting biased opinions. Miaers 17:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a historical fact that there was such resistance. Yes, it was overcome. I think that the resistance was silly; but its existence is a historical fact relevant to whether the institution would ever come into being. I am not saying they were right; but they were out there. Every time you read an article from that period, these objections are mentioned. It would be a violation of the NPOV principle to omit such objections just because they were wrong or because they were (in my opinion) foolish. We are trying to accurately describe the history of this institution; and the resistance is a part of that history. Public opinion is part of the historical record.--Orange Mike 19:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resistance to merge of UW with WSU system
Talk:1963 in music

message: For want of any better ideas, am in the process of ordering the albums released list alphabetically - otherwise it just becomes a free-for-all and a waste of time for anyone having a look. 83.180.162.37 19:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dear 60s and 70s music fans out there in wikiland (or is that wikispace?)
For want of an easier way of doing things, and following a question raised on another talk page, I am in the process of putting the albums released sections of the 60s and 70s in music pages into alphabetical order. 
Whilst I realise this may not be the best or most popular way of listing stuff, I reached the conclusion that other than going directly to an artist's article page, it was probably the most efficient/effective way to find that album that we want to check up on and compare it to its contemporaries. By way of example, if we were to put the following album in artist name order:
*Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5 - Jackson 5
we would [probably] have to include it twice on the same list: once under each of the named artists, whereas if we list it alphabetically there's no possible confusion(?). 
I'd appreciate some feedback on this, and in the hope that y'all agree with me (as you can imagine this is taking up quite a bit of my wikitime), I'm posting this note on all the relevant discussion pages. Please bear in mind I am only suggesting this for the albums released sections and NOT for any other kind of list. Thanx. 83.180.133.119 23:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  albums released - alphabetical order 

message: On the wiki page for the album Getz/Gilberto it reads that it was actually released in 1964 and only recorded in 1963. Kpjas (talk) 08:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums released - inconsistency 
Talk:1960 Munich C-131 crash

message: This article is listed under :Category:German air disasters, which in turn is a subcategory of :Category:Accidents and incidents on commercial airliners by country. However, the accident did not occur on a commercial airliner. Logically speaking, the Category:German air disasters is not a subcategory of Category:Accidents and incidents on commercial airliners by country.  Andreas  (T) 20:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which category? 

message: Would this not be better at 1960 Munich Convair Samaritan crash or similar as it does confuse when the first line says it is a C-131. MilborneOne (talk) 19:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. WideBlueSky (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name
Talk:Communist Party of Kazakhstan (Soviet Union)

message: Some question has emerged on how to deal with parties that were merged into and/or emerged out of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. I suggest a centralized discussion at Talk:Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union#Separate_articles. --Soman 11:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPSU 
Talk:Dakon (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 03:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As there were no responses, I redirected this article to the list page.  Since no response is also no consensus, any editor may restore this article at any time. However, rather than simply reverting, I urge you to use this space to develop some form of consensus regarding the article, lest another editor put this article up for deletion. BOZ (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/S. Jithesh (2nd nomination)

message: I have a doubt...? Sometimes u may feel it's too trivial. In India, it is very common for more than one person use the same computer. I and my husband are using same computer.In addition to that I'm working as a journalist in a notable Malayalam newspaper company. Hundreds of journalists are using the same IP address of the company's computer. My co-journalists are interested in wiki editing. Recently the it was imputed that we are sock puppet. Actually I was totally innocent. But how can I prove my innocence...? Any way there was no need to cancell this Afd. They had to consider the valuable opinions of the other eminent users like User:TruthbringerToronto, User:Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas, User:Bakasuprman, User:Devapriya, etc in the discussion.  A re-run of the Afd in a new environment was okay as per User:Splash. But someone deleted the page and protected it from further editing...! Is it justifiable. Am I Correct...? If there is sock puppetry punish them if it is proved beyond all doubts. Here sock puppetry is not proved beyond all doubts. But why they have punished the article...? I have never done sockpuppetry. I have popularised wikipedia and encouraged many to visit and contribute Malayalam Language related articles in order to improve it. Is it a big crime...? If so I'm so so sorry to all....! Please pardon me..  Nileena joseph (Talk|Contribs) 20:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What if when many people using same computer of their company
Talk:Papa Murphy's

message: The relevant guideline is WP:CORP, and it currently is not met. There may well be two independent sources or other criteria this chain meets, but the article at present does not contain that information. This is what the template is for. Erechtheus 02:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant guideline is not a guideline: it is a proposed guideline.  Cburnett 17:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Zombie (disambiguation)

message: Is it really necessary to cite that Doom 3 had zombies in it? DOOM had zombies in it, DOOM II had zombies in it, Half-Life had zombies in it, Half-Life 2 had zombies in it, an undoubtedly large number of games preceding these had zombies in them... No, it isn't. So I removed it. Takua108 20:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Doom 3

message: [] - It's a fungus that infects Ant brains, and makes them climb to an area with the correct temp/humidity conditions to release more spores.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.114.222 (talk) 16:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Life Zombies 

message: I felt the following entries were partial title matches, so I removed them:
* Kore wa Zombie Desu ka? (2011), an anime
* Zombies, characters in the Conker series (this is simply a zombie in a video game)
* Zombie apocalypse
* Zombie comedy, a film genre that aims to blend zombie horror motifs with slapstick comedy as well as dark comedy
* White Zombie (film), a 1932 horror film directed by Victor Halperin; considered the first feature length zombie film
* Zombieland (2009), a 2009 comedy film directed by Ruben Fleischer
* Zombies, Run!, a 2012 fitness app and Zombie Apocalypse game
* The Zombie Survival Guide, 2003 novel written by  Max Brooks 
* Zombies! Feast, a comic-book series from IDW publishing
* Zombie ball, an illusion in which a silvery ball appears to lift into the air and move about under a cloth
* "Zombie Zoo", a song by Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers
* Zombie walk, an organized public gathering of people who dress up in zombie costumes
* Zombie Squad, non-profit community service and disaster preparedness organization that uses the metaphor of a "Zombie Apocalypse" for any natural or man-made disaster
* Zombie star, the result of a supernova which leaves behind a remnant star
Hoof Hearted (talk) 14:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial title matches
Talk:Lira da braccio

message: Good job on making this page.  Badagnani 20:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great

message: Is the lirone related to the lira da braccio?  The tuning is different but it makes sense; even the name is similar.  This information should be added to the lirone article.  Badagnani 20:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's on this page, a little further down. I'll add it with source to the lirone page. Mak (talk) 20:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, the lirone has more strings and is tuned in a way that makes it easier to make more chords. I didn't mean that it is literally a bass lira da braccio, but it clearly developed from it (for once, a clear lineage). Mak (talk) 20:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The pegbox description on this article is that it's leaf-shaped and has frontal pegs, like most vielles I've seen. I guess that could go earlier in the article, in the lead. Mak (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lirone

message: Was this just bad Italian on Praetorius's part or the fact that (Florentine) Italian spelling hadn't yet been standardized? Badagnani (talk) 05:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: good point Badagnani, googling "lyra de bracio" gives some results in various sources. Unclear if they are inspired by Praetorius though (Stevepeterson (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bracio" 

message: I think this page confuses two instruments, the lira da braccio and the very different Byzantine lira.  The lira da braccio was an instrument with four or five bowed strings and two that were separate, possibly to be plucked.  It is strung similarly to the crwth (which is a true lyre) and shaped very like a violin.  By contrast, the Byzantine lira has three or four strings, no separate strings, and a body that is shaped more like that of a lute.  It is clearly related to the rebec and rabab.  If I had to guess, I would say the lira da braccio had in fact decended from a true lyre, such as the crwth or croud, and the Byzantine lira was unrelated except that they were both bowed. 
A similar confusion exists, and is pervasive in Wikipedia, between the lira da gamba and the viola da gamba, and, to a lesser degree between the viola da braccio and lira da braccio.  This, however, is more clearly wrong, and is addressed in some pages.
ghh 13:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion of two different instruments?

message: Viola da braccio redirects here. I think that is a mistake. Viola da braccio was an early name for the violin family used to distinguish the instruments of the violin family (including those that were not held da braccio such as the cello) from the violas da gamba. Thus viola da braccio should redirect to the Violin family article. Contact Basemetal here 07:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viola da braccio
Talk:Orana (New South Wales)

message: Orana Area Consultative Committee
Orana Regional Development BoardSauliH 03:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources

message: This entry should probably have a name like  Orana Region,  should it not ?    There is no place called Orana,  nor does it correspond to a recognised geographical feature.   Nor is it a real government subvision.    Its an aggregation of other subdivisions for various marketing purposes.Eregli bob (talk) 07:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct name for article 

message: This wiki page has a very big lack of information such as economic and geographical and cultural/historical context, needs urgent information added so people can know more about the region and what it’s defined as and what it is known for, i’ve recently fixed a lot of errors and needed images and more resources and references 120.18.75.92 (talk) 16:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Information for the region