Talk:OmegaT

message: * talk:Wikipedia:Leuce/OmegaT--Wikipedia:Leuce/OmegaT → OmegaT … Rationale: The current OmegaT page is basically the readme.txt file of the program, which was temporarily put up.  The contents of this new version was extensively discussed on the OmegaT user group, and some of the developers also took part in the discussion to ensure that the information is accurate.  — leuce 08:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 06:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: add ja:OmegaT
:done. CMummert · talk 23:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding Ja:OmegaT link 

message: It might be useful to list any challenging languages or language types (ideographic or right-to-left, for example) that OmegaT can or can't support, and give some idea of how many languages it can support. Presumably it can support all the languages in which it has been localised. Ma1cius (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Language Support

message: OmegaT uses a number of logos. The one used for the Mac version is different from the one used in the Windows version for ex. The official site uses yet another one. Where is the requirement that the Wikipedia page should use the one specifically on the "About" page of the application ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jc helary (talk • contribs) 22:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason that software programs' logos are displayed on their Wikipedia pages is for recognition purposes.  The "logo" isn't simply any nice picture that is used to make the article prettier.  The picture reverted to is not used *anywhere* in OmegaT as a logo.  The official site doesn't use a logo at all (it uses an image at the top of the page, but that is hardly a "logo").  If it is true that the Mac has a different logo, then upload the logo and put it alongside the Windows logo. -- leuce (talk) 08:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: Someone changed my "panes" to "Winows".  On Microsoft Windows, OmegaT runs as a single window with several panes inside it.  Is it different on other OSes?  Does OmegaT have separate windows on Mac, for example? -- leuce (talk) 11:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone is me, as the history can tell you. And the terms "window" and "pane" are confusing. I strongly suggest we adapt emacs terminology with "frame" and "window" if we need to make a distinction between the two "things". Jc helary (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  OmegaT is not related to Emacs at all, and Emacs has a rather small user base, so I doubt if Emacs terminology will be the mainstream terminology (even among OmegaT users). Anyway, I'm not sure if the difference is that important (though clearly it was important to you, or you would not have changed it). -- leuce (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  These should not be changed to Windows, they are not Windows at all. They are actually panels, but panes is a very similar thing within the actual (Swing) framework used to make the program. There is no reason in the world to use Emacs terminology, that is just obtuse. A consistent representation across platforms should be strived for, with some allowances where it is reasonable. It is not reasonable to change panes to Windows because Windows have very specific features that the inner panels in the program do not have, even when floating detached outside the main window (and even on Mac OS X). It is called terminology, use the right one. You have to understand what you are talking about when you messing with program specific issues, that is best left to developers. Let them tell you what the proper terms are, then make changes as directed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.252.94.226 (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panes or windows 

message: User:Jc_helary removed this:
: OmegaT typically cannot translate the proprietary file formats of other CAT tools, such as TTX from Trados, ITD from SDLX, TXML from Wordfast, or XLF bundles from Idiom. Some of these formats can be handled by OmegaT in limited circumstances, if converted to a format that OmegaT supports.
saying:
: other cat tools format" section since they typically correspond to the "xliff" section
but (a) the XLIFF section doesn't mention these formats and (b) do we have references to support the idea that all of these formats (in limited cases) can be converted using Rainbow's XLIFF procedure? -- leuce (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other CAT tools section 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.articlesbase.com/corporate-articles/free-open-source-translation-memory-software-omegat-vs-anaphraseus-tm-1472085.html
*:Triggered by \barticles(?:base|vana)\.com\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: I don't know how much of this you may have been following, but there are strange powers at work here on Wikipedia. For several years now, people have been trying to create a page for CafeTran. However, no matter what people do, the page is blocked every step of the way. Now, I know that if you are a professional translator, you will probably have heard of CafeTran by now. Hell, Proz.com, the largest platform for translators in the world offers it for free now as part of their Plus Package!
Anyway, the Wikipedia goblins have since removed ALL traces of all the hard work that we but into trying to create a page for CafeTran. Have a look at what is left:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cafetran_Espresso
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cafetran_Espresso
Then go to:
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_computer-assisted_translation_tools
… and look at all the CAT tool that ARE allowed to have their own pages:
* Across (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Across_Language_Server) 
* Crowdin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdin) 
* Déjà Vu (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9j%C3%A0_Vu_(software))
* GlobalSight (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GlobalSight)
* Gtranslator (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gtranslator)
* MateCat (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MateCat)
* memoQ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MemoQ)
* MetaTexis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaTexis)
* OmegaT (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OmegaT)
* Open Language Tools (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Language_Tools)
* Phrase (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrase_(software))
* Poedit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poedit)
* Pootle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pootle)
* SDL Trados Studio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDL_Trados_Studio)
* SmartCat (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmartCAT)
* Virtaal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtaal)
* Wordfast (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wordfast)
What on earth is going on here?
If CafeTran is not ‘notable’ (I think that was their main reason for now allowing a page about it), then it would stand to reason that most of the above CAT tool articles should also be deleted, right?
MichaelBeijer (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 13:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mysterious Matter of the Missing CafeTran