lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Construction of splitting fields

message: * may be something useful there, but its not accessible for the general user in the form it is now. also probably too detailed. Also likely a straight copy of a text. Bwithh 06:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Can someone have a look at where this article refers to quotient ring and see if this should be field extension instead?  It looks like the two concepts are different but have similar notation, e.g. see field extension.  I thought the quotient ring was *smaller* than what you started with but the field extension should be in some sense bigger.  
I changed the article (wasn't logged on) but then changed it back as I was not sure.
Danpovey (talk) 00:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The quotient K[x]/(f(x)) would be a field extension if f were irreducible over K. With infinite sets there is no bigger or smaller. If you are talking about inclusion, then K[x] or the rational field extension K(x) contain K, as does K[x]/(f(x)), but the latter is in some sense smaller than K[x], since its elements are equivalence classes, which are subsets of K[x].--LutzL (talk) 10:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On second view, in the previous step f is chosen as an irreducible factor, so that field extension would be correct. And the desired end result is a finitely generated field extension, constructed as a chain of field extensions, so that it should be mentioned in the iteration step.--LutzL (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotient or extension
Talk:American theater (World War II)

message: Regarding the infobox, I have a hard time seeing that the involvement of Mexico and Brazil was strong enough for them to be listed as belligerents in the American Theater. There was the Brazilian Expeditionary Force that fought elsewhere, not the American Theater, and there was the Mexican Expeditionary Air Force, including the 201st Fighter Squadron (Mexico), which fought in the Philippines. The article as it now stands tells the reader absolutely nothing about Brazilian or Mexican military efforts locally, in the American Theater. Instead, both countries suffered shipping losses from enemy submarines. 
I would rather remove these two countries from the infobox, but if someone can argue that they had a significant contribution to the American Theater, it would be most appropriate to describe this significance to the reader in the article body before we list a country in the infobox. Binksternet (talk) 02:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazil and Mexico as belligerents 

message: (Apologies if this is the incorrect place for such a message; am still trying to master Wikipedia's editing system)
In the "Axis" column of "Belligerents", the 'Spanish Empire' is listed, under a redlink, and misspelled. I do not see anything in the talk page history about whether or not Spain should be removed (though I don't doubt there's a legitimate reason for it to be there!) Would I be justified in, at the minimum, fixing the link and correcting the typo ("Emprie" to "Empire"?)Kaiser Wilhelm the Tenth (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error regarding Spain's placement as "Axis" 

message: Two sentences that were directly quoted from the source were missing quotation marks, I added them.  These were found incidentally.  No exhaustive search was made, there are probably more. Citizen127 (talk) 00:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing quotation marks 
Talk:Abstention doctrine

message: The elements of a discussion on this topic should be primarily regarding whether or not there is a such thing as a state having jurisdiction over Constitutional issues.  One issue for example is the simple fact that that if a State passes a law that is not Constitutional, then how can a state be unbiased in judging it's own laws.
*I'm not sure where you're coming from there - abstention doctrines are more about the use of power of federal courts than in state courts. It is well settled law that states can have jurisdiction over constitutional issues to the extent that Congress does not withhold such jurisdiction exclusively to the federal courts.  BD2412 talk 15:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "... if an individual who was charged ... under a state law believes [a connected] search was ... in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights, that person may have a cause of action to sue the state ... a federal court will not hear the case until the person is convicted of the crime."
Presumably there is still a cause of action for unlawful search even if that person is aquitted - shouldn't that be mentioned? Jonathan Hall (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know the answer to that. It is conceivable that a person who is acquitted has no cause of action at all, because their acquittal vindicates their rights. bd2412 T 23:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Younger Abstention - clarification 

message: It seems the "Ecclesiastical Abstention" doctrine, apparently rooted in Watson v Jones, would also fall within the ambit of this article; however, I'm not a lawyer, and therefore lack confidence to add a piece on it. Abb3w (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecclesiastical Abstention
Talk:List of sovereign states and dependent territories in South America by population density

message: Requesting a simmalar page for North America
Done http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_American_countries_by_population_density
Mystic eye 05:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: Ecuador's population density is calculated wrong, being roughly 47/km2 rather than 457, placing it 147th in the world rather than 1st. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andres783 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in table
Talk:Adelphi Charter

message: Cicada 07:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kim Poirier

message: For future editors, normally the official web site is http://www.kimpoirier.com, but that site is down (returns "403" forbidden" to be precise).  But http://www.midatlanticproductions.com/kimpoirier/ seems to work.  Note, previously both urls lead to exactly the same content/website.  One is normally just a pointer to the other.  It's possible either or both will or won't work in the future.  So, I'm mentioning both here, in case it needs to be changed again.  --rob 07:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: About the official site

message: I removed the following as unsourced and in violation of WP:BLP. If someone can find a source, please feel free to put it back (perhaps with less POV wording): She moved back to Toronto to film a ABC TV pilot called Happy Town but got canned for outshining the lead.  68.146.81.123 (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted content
Talk:Elections to the European Parliament

message: content archived — Preceding comment was not signed. CapnZapp (talk) 10:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: February 17, 2008

message: Under eligibility, it says that residents of each country can vote. But the EU website says that "If you live outside the EU, you can usually vote in the EU elections in your home country's embassy or consulate." Exceptions are Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Greece and Italy. https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/residence/elections-abroad/european-elections/index_en.htm#non-EU-country Thispoemisveryfragmentary (talk) 12:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eligibility of non-residents 

message: Suggest changing title to "European Parliament election" since "Elections to the European Parliament" is too wordy. Additionally for consistency with 2019 European Parliament election. HudecEmil (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Parliament election 

message: Hi, the article states that there are no polls available on the aggregate level but there is this article having bunch of polls for 2024: Opinion polling and seat projections for the 2024 European Parliament election Hazzy (talk) 10:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion polling
Talk:Alexander of Aphrodisias

message: I'll go back and review my copy again, it has been a while, but as I learned it On The Soul was a direct commentary on Aristotle's De Anima, and not a pure original work.  Although that is a bit of a funny thing to say I realize. --Domhail 07:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The dark zone between the outer edge of the (main) rainbow and the inner edge od the secondary rainbow ist namend - at least in German: "Alexanders dunkles Band": See http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_von_Aphrodisias . --Helium4 (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and this is mentioned at Alexander_of_Aphrodisias#Influence with a link to Alexander's band.  Wareh (talk) 13:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dark Band of Alexander" around the rainbow 

message: The doubt raised in footnote 1 has now surely been put to rest by the inscription referred to in footnotes 6 and 7?
--Northutsire (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - might as well remove the outdated footnote, rather than leave it in the page as an example of what people once didn't know about him. Pasicles (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Aphrodisias?
Talk:Marple, Greater Manchester

message: Page could really use a photo of Marple.  Anyone got anything suitable?? --Sgkay 07:53, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Can someone please tell me how large Stockport is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.182.224 (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Stockport article covers it pretty well, unless there's further information you need? --Oscarthecat (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: Marple has two railway stations and a population of over 20,000. By my reckoning that makes it a town. It's a former urban district and is referred to as a town throughout the article. User:Kingfiisher appears to believe it's a village. Any thoughts? Keen to avoid an edit war. "Small town" might be an acceptable compromise in the lede. Dave.Dunford (talk) 12:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or village?
Talk:M58 motorway

message: Why is there no exit at the Kirkby junction?
The motorway does not run south of the Orrell area. Orrell is also to the east of the M6, directly adjoining Pemberton. The motorway runs through the western section of  Orrell splitting the western section into the north and south areas (see the article), before joining the M6. The motorway is called the Liverpool to Wigan motorway, not the Liverpool to Orrell. Man2 22:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the Ordnance Survey shows the east of the M6 being Redwoord and Lamberhead Green.  Orrell is clearly shown on the west. only. --Regan123 00:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Well if that is true the road ends in Orrell.  But the OS map text size clearly indicates that Orrell is given the same status as Wigan.  It is therefore not part of Wigan according to the OS map.  This is considered a strong and accurate source on Wikipedia. Regan123 01:01, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Talk (Coldplay song)

message: I would have taken this on as a GAN review, but I've done a few Coldplay reviews recently, and thought it may be best to get a fresher pair of eyes for one or two. However, I've glanced over the article and came up with a query on the release dates. The infobox says it was released on 13 December (US), the next line says 19 December (not sure what country). However in the release section it says
"Coldplay released "Talk" in the US and UK on 19 December 2005 as the album's third single.[8] The single was pressed with two B-side's: "Gravity" and "Sleeping Sun".
:Has been fixed. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. But since it was released two days after, I think it needs to be explained how it was possible. Peanut4 (talk) 21:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query on dates 

message: "The band received permission from the electronic music German band Kraftwerk to use the main riff" -> I don't see anything that implies this on any of the cited sources. I didn't found any material mentioning this as well. Patiferoolz (talk) 18:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If they didn't get permission, they should have received a lawsuit before. --Efe (talk) 03:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily. Kraftwerk can be passive about it, by not suing them. But this don't imply that they've got prior permission to using the song. Also, the quoted affirmation source simply don't confirm it -- Patiferoolz (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If that doesn't satisfy you, then check X&Y's booklet, its stated right there. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kraftwerk permission? Are you sure? 

message: Under "composition", the following is stated:
The song is built around a simple guitar lick by Jonny Buckland.
I think it is fair to say that the guitar lick isn't "by" him in any sense, but by Kraftwerk. The sources indicated are not sufficient for such a statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.221.33.138 (talk) 21:43, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar lick "by" Buckland
Talk:Farkas Bolyai

message: Shouldn't this be at Bolyai Farkas, given that Farkas is the surname, (Most Hungarian bios conform to the English standard: Imre Nagy, Miklós Horthy, Franz Liszt, Zoltán Kodály)? -JCarriker 08:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: According to the present article, Farkas Bolyai's son, János Bolyai was born in Marosvásárhely (Târgu-Mureş).  The article on János Bolyai locates his birth in Kolozsvár (Cluj-Napoca).  Which article is right?  --Rotkraut 21:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: János Bolyai was born in Kolozsvár. On the picture above you can see the house wher he was born. --Hkoala (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace of János Bolyai 
Talk:Motorola 6800 family

message: — JIP | Talk 19:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD result 

message: The deletion debate seemed pretty bogus to me… there is no "68h" series except for in this article. The debate was carried out carelessly with most of the keep comments coming from folks who obviously didn't follow the links, or have no prior knowledge of these chips.
The 6800/6502 families are very similar but slightly different because of incestuous engineering teams. (Namely, Chuck Peddle left Moto for MOS Technologies after the 6800's release.) The 6501 "belonged" in the 6800 family but this resulted in a lawsuit, settled by purposely making the 6502 incompatible. Because of these subtle differences, the processors aren't really in the same family and hence the common term 6800/6502.
Check these google results: 68h microprocessor 6800 6502 -wiki -wikipedia gives 79 hits but the first few obviously mirror us.
6800/6502 gives 342 and 6502/6800 gives 801 (which says something about the relative popularity of the original :vP ).
So -
* Move the article to 6800/6502 microprocessor families until
* It can be merged somewhere more appropriate.
Just browsing through this general neighborhood, all these µP/µC articles could use a good scrub. We need stubs for all the chips mentioned in this article and a category to unify them, more than a (misleading) overview article like this one.
Potatoswatter 11:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This is not an article... delete it. Matan 03:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge or move or delete or something! 

message: 70.55.85.43 (talk) 08:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: The Hitachi chips should be mentioned. 70.55.85.43 (talk) 08:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hitachi

message: I think the 6804 should be mentioned here.  It was meant to be a cost-reduced 6805, even if it has a different architecture from other members of the family.  (Harvard architecture, internally serial)  Motorola put it in the same family tree in the data books. 
More info here Fmpalazzolo (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  6804
Talk:Dross

message: *http://www.themetalcasting.com/slag-dross-formation-tendency.html 
This link was in the external links - there is something odd about this site - it appears to contain some interesting metals information. But I'm not sure about the overall reliability - in particular lack of references in the articles, and the odd use of english suggest it is an amatuer effort (or possibly a translation)
eg from http://www.themetalcasting.com/powder-metallurgy.html There's a a huge market evolving for Powder Metallurgy. The strides that it has made especially over the past quarter century is no doubt a remarkable achievement. No doubt world wide metal powder production is exceeding 1 million tons.. see what I mean about the language.
To me it looks like a mirror of a wikipedia page (ad supported) but probably isn't - I don't think this site should be taken to be reliable - maybe an expert should look at it.
The linked page http://www.themetalcasting.com/slag-dross-formation-tendency.html also defines dross a residue from non-ferrous metals, is this correct? Sf5xeplus (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did a search for a few relevant sites. If you think it's dubious, by all means remove it.--MacRusgail (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange site

message: The introduction refers to "alloys such as tin, lead, zinc or aluminium". But isn't an alloy strictly a mixture of elements? These are elements, themselves.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.226.146.65 (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to fix that.Oranjblud (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elements referred to as alloys 

message: This article should be moved to "dross (metallurgical)" or somesuch, and then this can be a general/disambiguation article about dross in general.
CapnZapp (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The main article on "dross" should NOT be its metallurgical definition
Talk:Trick (1999 film)

message: Is it appropriate to note that Miss Coco Peru looked like a nightmarish version of Tori Spelling in this movie?  I thought it was a gag of some sort because Coco cornered Gabriel in the bathroom they way that Tori's character cornered the conversation in the diner and kept using the word, "shit."--Wonder J (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *If there are reliable sources that discuss it then it might be appropriate as part of a Production section. Otherwise it's probably trivia and best avoided. I know Coco talks about it in her Wisecrack special so a quote from her exists but it really needs additional sourcing before being included. Words like "nightmarish" should be avoided unless a reliable source uses it and the bathroom/shit connection is quite likely coincidence. Otto4711 (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Miss Coco Peru's and Tori Spelling's Resemblance

message: This page was moved from "Trick (movie)" to "Trick (film)" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) – Ianblair23 (talk) 08:28, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Does Miss Coco have a name in the film? If so, we should use the name instead of "Miss Coco". Or can we just say "the drag queen"? I'm not sure if the "Steve Hayes" link is correct. It now links to an English businessman. Chimin 07 (talk) 07:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor / actress names
Talk:Uzziah

message: I believe that this article at least needs to acknowledge that most of the information is taken directly out of biblical texts with other historical facts, or lack thereof, not considered. Therefore I have added, "according to biblical tradition" to the beginning of the body of the article.JoshMahar 08:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Takijirō Ōnishi

message: Support for the assertion that Onishi was not the father of Kamikaze strategy may be found in Warner, Denis, Peggy Warner, with Commander Sadao Seno. 1982. The Sacred Warriors: Japan's Suicide Legions. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.  -Mak Thorpe 02:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not the father of Kamikaze strategy 

message: I have found an article that contrasts sharply with the content so far:
It is not pleasant to contemplate how the conflict might have ended if the strategy advocated by Japan’s hardliners had prevailed. One of them, Vice Adm. Takijiro Onishi, vice chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff, stormed into a ministerial meeting on Aug. 13 to harangue against surrender, saying, “Zenkokumin nisenman-nin gisei no kakugo wo kimereba, shori wa wareware no mono” (“If the entire nation commits to accepting the sacrifice of 20 million people, then victory will be ours”).
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/08/01/national/history/top-secret-flights-ended-war
If it is reliable, please someone add it, thanks! Syced (talk) 02:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  sacrifice of 20 million
Talk:Aryan Language

message: Hi,
Do we really need two separate articles - one on Old Persian and one on "Aryan language"? Given the inherant ambiguity of the term "Aryan", I suggest that this one should be a redirect, or that it should be renamed "Old Persian Alphabet", or "Aryan alphabet" if there is consensus that this is more useful. Most of the article seems to be about the alphabet. Note that Aryan language (small L) is already a redirect to the Indo-European languages page. I'd suggest that that title should become a diambiguation page. Paul B 09:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:G7es torpedo

message: Hi, does anybody knows why the existing Category:World War II German torpedoes (which aimed to group all torpedoes designed / built / used by Germany) is now missing?  Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 05:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category missing for "German Torpedoes"... 

message: I've glanced the german version of this article, and seems to have much more info than this one. Unfortunately, I do not read/write/speak german... can anyone help translating it?  Thanks, DPdH (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Room for improvement...
Talk:Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002

message: Hi, the article mentions that "Muslims were systematically targetted and subjected to custodial torture and murder". Please cite a source for this statement. --Spartiate 09:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine as long as it relates only to POTA. If you wish to go beyond that I would look to adding this to other articles, such as: Law enforcement in India, Law of India, or Indian Police Service. Regards. Barkeep Chat | $ 16:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

message: In an essay in her latest book, Listening to Grasshoppers, Roy presents lucid criticism of this law. Perhaps someone will bother to look into this with the aim of including her criticism into the article. __meco (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arundhati Roy criticism 