Template talk:Avatar: The Last Airbender

message: My thought is that "Guest voices" doesn't really belong under the "Characters" section (since guest voices aren't really the characters themselves), but rather under the "Information" section.  Any thoughts on this suggestion? Prototime 20:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  And I moved it.  =)  (It's mostly because guest voices also stretches out the template box more than I like. --Crisu 22:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest voices 

message: Not good with names. Huh, shouldn't it be the other way around? Eh, anyway though they are nice articles, but considering their categorization (hope I'm spelling it right) I don't think its neccessary to display them in the main template box. They should instead be inserted (as they already are) into a more suitable page. Pai Sho for Iroh, Aang for the Avatar State. We don't have to throw every single page we have in here. Take the Ba Sing Se's page for example, on it's own, its pretty well-organized and referenced, but its not here. Instead, its link fits snuggly into the Earth Kingdom page. ~Father's Wish 14 March 2007 (CT)
:Honestly, my question would tend to be why Ba Sing Se isn't here. Navigational templates are usually pretty all-inclusive, and there's really no reason for this one not to be, in my opinion.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Like I said, "its link fits snuggly into the Earth Kingdom page". If ya look at the template, to say the least, its catorgerized. Take Ba Sing Se for example: (Universe)-> Earth Kingdom-> Main Article: Ba Sing Se (its link is in the very first paragraph). For Pai Sho: Iroh-> Main Article: Pai Sho. Then for something like Chakra which doesn't currently have a proper present categorization but has a large amount of information and proves to be a fundemental concept of the show's universe thingie, its link is right up their under Universe. Basically its all about maintaining the organization, which is pretty much how this thing got on FA status, which I'm told is supposed to be a "big deal". ~Father's Wish 17 March 2007 (CT) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Father's Wish II (talk • contribs) 03:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pai Sho + Avatar State

message: You know, the characters part of this template isn't really organised.  I put the names in alphabetical order, and it's reversed.  Why?  Hello2112 17:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation 

message: Are the other websites really needed?  Earthbendingmaster 16:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they aren't. All of the information available on those sites is available here as well. The only one i could see needing a link would be the wikiquote, but that can go on the list page. Rau J16 19:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

text: And we will continue to undo yours. Fansites do not belong in the template and Wikiquote is already provided on the articles. They are not needed. Rau's talk 03:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Avatar Wikia is a fansite and Wikiquote does not belong in the template. The template is for major and relevant articles inside Wikipedia. Rau's talk 04:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Websites 

message: Just wondering; since the movie haven't its own article yet, shouldn't it be excluded from the template until such time arrives? Additionally, I was wondering if the movie article would be part of the "franchise" section...--haha169 (talk) 19:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie

message: Template:Avatar → Template:Avatar: The Last Airbender —
Matching the title of the main article, and gets rid of a title that has been highly contentious in articlespace (Talk:avatar), and also for the second most popular film in history  (Avatar (2009 film))
76.66.197.77 (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: A debate on how the template should be designed here. Feel free to participate. Jhenderson777 (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Template look

message: Should the articles Air Nomads and Water Tribe not be included in this template? Jpjacobs.00 (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nations

message: I made this version to help simplify the organization. I realize it was a bold edit, and if reverted I would at least like a discussion for it. thank you.Lucia Black (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding template change