Talk:DokuWiki

message: Personal wiki talks about DokuWiki on a Stick, maybe the DokuWiki page also needs a mention of this, more info on this here.
--Liloboy sa (talk) 14:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DokuWiki on a Stick 

message: I'm not seeing anything about the Bitnami dokuwiki installer here. Their site is also a bit sparse on information. I'm looking into this for my company and am surprised that all the info isn't already here, wikipedia usually beats me to the punch. :) At any rate, this is billed as "a virtual machine image preconfigured to run DokuWiki" but it's asking for an apache server upon install so I'm not sure how much it relies on the host operating system for help. 
http://bitnami.org/stack/dokuwiki
--Gmuir (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bitnami installer 

message: As some citation remarks (,  and ) were put into this article more than 20 monthes ago , what's the current status of them?
I found few references have been increased since Mar 2008 (when these templates were added), but I guess they are enough as original sources.
If anyone remove these citation/reference templates, I can translate this to other language(s).
Any ideas for the status or references? --ayucat (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The primarysources tag is still completely accurate: there are far too many citations to less-than-independent sources. But the second banner could be removed in my opinion. Steven Walling 19:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your consideration. I think so too. Also I thank  to correct them. As a summary, the current status of references is that the article still needs primary citations. ayucat (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The current status of references/citations as of Dec 2009 

message: Looking through the references on this page, I see little more than trivial mentions, primary sources, or other non-reliable sources. This article may be subject to an AfD discussion if better sources cannot be located. I've added the  tag. --AbsolutDan (talk) 18:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References revisited 

message: This article was considered for deletion due to a lack of references and a perceived lack of notability.  Following work by several editors the AfD was withdrawn, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DokuWiki.  Since the article now has more citations and is accepted as notable I'm deleting the  and  tags. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The article still has some content that does not have footnotes and I am ambivalent on whether "more citations needed" should be removed or not, but notability has been established (I was the editor who added the notability template and I am fine with it being removed. Thank you for explaining this here, it's a rare best practice). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and notability 

message: Does anyone know what the 'doku' in dokuwiki means, and it's history? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 07:19, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Which means? – Ilovemydoodle (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Document.  DokuWiki was initially designed for documentation, hence "documentation Wiki" or in German "Dokumentation Wiki" -> "DokuWiki". Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name?