lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tim Sweeny

message: I started this page, if anyone actually knows the Bio of Tim Sweeny, feel free to add and expand this article. -- Nerketur 20:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already a bio of this Tim Sweeny at Tim Sweeney (game developer), so it's probably better just to redirect this page there. Plum743 02:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have redirected to the Tim Sweeney disambiguation page. Henning Makholm 14:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2007

message: Locomondo won the national selection.194.105.107.36 20:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winner of the national selection 
Talk:Ruy Barbosa

message: Dear Mr./Mrs. "200.204.235.233 (talk)",
welcome to the english wikipedia and thanks for contributing allready.
In order to avoid future misunderstandings please try to avoid editing without motivating your actions.
For example in your first and only edit that took place at 23:55, monday the 23 February 2009 you removed the Ruy Barbosa famous quotation that I have inserted the 30th of November 2008 at 13:54:
Plus you have
# changed (...) minister of finances and taxation (...) into (...) Minister of Finance (...) (the bold is mine) and 
# changed peace conference into Peace Conference (the bold is mine).
I am posting a copy of this on the talk page of the Ruy Barbosa article.
You are kindly invited to participate in order to debate on your changes.
Thanks for your attention.
Yours faithfully.
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 07:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome to wikipedia
Talk:My First Day

message: I don't know if the trivia about the clone high T-shirt is true, I watched it in slow-mo and could not distinguish it
:I was suspicious too, so I went back to the episode on DVD, and it seems to be true, though it's not the standard logo. --Gpollock 22:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: About 8 seconds into the episode(give or take a few milliseconds), pausing the DVD gives you a good shot of the t-shirt, it is indeed a t-shirt with the clone high logo. Vinay S. 06:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Is the plot too detailed? Let me know and I can re-write it. This is my first major edit on Wikipedia, and I'm not really sure what I'm doing right & wrong. Xiainx (talk) 04:59, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Category talk:Airliner accidents and incidents caused by design or manufacturing errors

message: *Since there are already 2 users, who doubt, that my classification of Bashkirian_Airlines_Flight_2937#Conflicting_orders in this category is correct ( and ),
*since my point of view might be uncommon or unwanted here ,
I would like to ask here for cross-checking my decision by at least 2 other individuals.
Thank you. --Homer Landskirty 20:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: meaning of this category

message: The two 737 rudder crashes.. Shouldn't they be added due to the defect in the servo valve? 72.77.93.122 (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup - sounds good... Just do it... :-) --Homer Landskirty (talk) 07:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US427/UA585
Template talk:Yahoo!

message: The Desktop Search link on this template leads to an entry which is about generic desktop searches rather than the Yahoo! application. --The Missing Hour 20:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desktop Search 

message: Why is Yahoo! Auctions listed as a former product? It is the largest auction site in Japan!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.247.11.156 (talk) 19:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added back in. --Funandtrvl (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yahoo! Auctions 

message: Delicious has been sold. It should either be removed from the template or moved to a new 'Sold' section of it. 99.27.249.23 (talk) 04:11, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it to the Other section for now. Thanks for the reminder, much appreciated. Steven Walling • talk  04:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added "or sold" to the Discontinued section, so I moved it there. --Funandtrvl (talk) 21:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delicious 

message: Why Yahoo! Autos links to TrueCar? 109.173.183.141 (talk) 10:27, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yahoo! Autos
Talk:Our Lady of Good Counsel

message: Ithillion 22:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: No, not possibly "a fresco executed on a thin layer of porcelain": see Wikipedia porcelain for a start.--Wetman (talk) 04:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is what it says here. But it seems hard to imagine how one would do a fresco on a wall as you said. Yet my idea and yours would be WP:OR. History2007 (talk) 08:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Porcelain"

message: The Albanian aspect of this image is barely touched on. According to Tradition, the origins of this painting is in the Arberesh community, who fled Turkish persecution from Albania to Italy. Why is this ignored?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.201.173.75 (talk) 20:10, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Albanian Aspect
Talk:Joan of Arc (band)

message: The description of the band's most controversial album, The Gap, could use some improvement. On 24 February 2022 it was changed from this:
to this new version by Noemienours:
I'm a big fan of The Gap, and although I agree that the first description is quite inaccurate (seems like it was written without listening to the music but after having read a negative review), I don't consider it to be the band's most "danceable" work, either. The "wasn't listened to seriously by Jade Tree" part would also require a citation. I'm going to rewrite this description unless someone objects.  Lorenjan (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten April 14, 2023. Hopefully the new version is an improvement. Lorenjan (talk) 19:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The Gap

message: Can someone fix the discography of this band per Wikipedia:Lists?  Also, please don't create a gallery of album covers in the article.  I know that this appears in many articles, but it violates Wikipedia:Fair use criteria and we're trying to clean them up.  Jkelly 21:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced it.  Jkelly 21:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: The article on Tim Kinsella includes an extensive list of the bands he's been in, plus short bios of the bands.  The section on Joan of Arc on that page, though, is several paragraphs long and includes a discography as well as a lot of other redundant material covered in the Joan of Arc article.  I think this section should be shortened, with its unique content merged into the Joan of Arc article, along with a "Main Article" link. -- 128.148.20.123 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree but I think Tim Kinsella does deserve his own page. I have truncated the JOA section on Kinsella's page and included a link to this page. I have also linked the discography to this page. I see no reason to have the information in two places. Since this discussion hasn't had any activity for several months (and no apparent opposition), I have also removed the tags. Athene cunicularia (talk) 18:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger from the Tim Kinsella article 
Talk:Bhaad-gaaule

message: This article is very important because its about the residents of a very famous ancient city - Bhaad-gaaun or Bhadgaon in the Kathmandu valley of Nepal. This is also about a part of the Nepalese National Dress and it is important that people know about Nepal and Neplese aspects. This article is not a hoax. KP-Adhikari 21:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007
Talk:Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God

message: This statement "Traditionalist Catholics continue to celebrate this feast day with the old name "The Maternity of the Blessed Virgin Mary" on 11 October" should be edited because because of Pope Benedict XVI's Summorum Pontificum permits the celebration of the extraordianry form of the Roman Rite to any priest or religious congregation. Many priests that celebrate and many laypeople who assist at Mass in the extraordinary form would not consider theirselves to be "Traditionalist Catholics."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.243.141.206 (talk) 17:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 23:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Traditionalist Catholics continue..." 

message: Who in the world wrote this? - someone who hates Catholics?  THE MOST IMPORTANT DAY OF THE YEAR IS EASTER , THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST !!!  I have been a practicing Catholic my ENTIRE LIFE  and am amazed that there are some people who don't even think, know  or accept the fact that WE ARE CHRISTIANS.  We DO NOT worship Mary and other saints.  JESUS CHRIST IS GOD MANIFESTED AS MAN, and JESUS CHRIST is OUR SAVIOR. 2600:100F:B01F:7858:0:2F:BAD9:F601 (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most important day in Roman Catholic Church
Talk:Revolving door policy (Palestinian Authority)

message: I nominated this article for a neutrality check because the tone is heavily biased against Arafat and the Palestinian leadership. The article does more than just report "facts". Whether or not what is stated in the article is true, the tone still needs to be addressed; otherwise, the article looks like silly propaganda. Rintrah 21:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Migration period of ancient Burma/Archive 1

message: * Today I history-merged Early history of Burma to Migration period of ancient Burma. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page history

message: I am aware that this article seems to be pasted from the History of Myanmar and appears not to be originally written by the sole contributor here .
I have slight concerns about this specific article and have detagged it from the History of Myanmar for the time being. It appears to be unnecessarily Tai and Mon-centric and not wholly appropriate as a summary of the early history of Burma which presumably is that prior to the establishment of the First Burmese Empire by Anawratha.
I feel it needs peer review and appraisal and would be helped by supporting links / sources .
It would be enhanced by any supporting evidence that there was any wholesale Tai immigration into Northern present day Burma or establishment of kingdoms before the fall of Bagan or the fall of Dali to the Mongols in the 13th century. This would help legitimise the inclusion of the Tai as an important factor in Burma's pre Bagan history . The inclusion of the names of various Tai polities outside the borders of present day Burma with whom Tai polities were affiliated either briefly or otherwise is irrelevant to this article and should be deleted.
* The theory that Nan Zhao / Dali  was Tai ruled is now largely discredited and therefore its inclusion is not appropriate.
* An assumption is made that Thaton and Suvarnabhumbi are the same without source.
* The article applies Tai-centricity to the early history of Northern/Upper Burma and Mon-centricity to the early history of Southern/Lower Burma.
*There are no references to the Pyu in this section which is bias by exclusion . 
Regards Bayinnaung 12:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification issues/ neutral point of view issues

message: There are two articles with the same name, one with normal font and another topic is written in italic. Please read them here_  Early history of Burma and Early History of Burma.--Darz kkg (talk) 04:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One article is linked to Burma’s Early history,Main article: Early History of Burma and another one is linked to History of Burma’s Early History section’s Main article: Early history of Burma  and the box in the History of Burma. --Darz kkg (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just stumbled by here to comment that I think this is pretty uncontroversial; WP:MOS dictates the title should be "Early history of Burma", as in this article. Anyone who actually knows the subject matter please go ahead and merge the other article to here. --Pfhorrest (talk) 03:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Support Support merge Hugo999 (talk) 22:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article is about Prehistory and not early history about Burma. Early history should be deal with before Pagan Kingdom era. Soewinhan (talk) 10:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: It is prehistory
Talk:Rita Verreos

message: This article should be deleted ASAP.  Agrippina Minor
I think if there's an article on JP for Survivor: Cook Islands, there's no reason Rita should have an article.  She is a nationally acclaimed model and she has connections with her brother who was on Project Runway.  So if this is deleted...then so should JP's.  Small5th 03:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They should both be deleted, but inclusionists are so desperate to keep pages that they will do anything. If only they were that inspired when it comes to improving important pages as opposed to wasting their time trying to keep NN ones, then Wikipedia would be all set. -- Scorpion0422 13:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chris Roberts (chairman)

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV template without ongoing discussion per [[Template:POV]] instructions
Talk:Assumption of the Virgin Mary in art

message: This article really needs to get expanded with text. There is plenty to write about, but as is it is just a list of items, + a gallery. And as is it is assumes (perhaps rightly so) the topic to be along the lines of Western depictions with Dormition of the Theotokos treated as a separate issue. That is probably a good separation, but it should at least be clarified. If no one else gets to it, I will try to do it by the end of the year, or thereabouts. History2007 (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Better late than never! Johnbod (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Assumption of the Virgin Mary (Rubens)

message: The painting reproduced on this page is not the same work as the high altarpiece in the Cathedral of Our Lady, Antwerp. It is a much smaller studio version; similar, but not the same. Should there be a history of the commission (from 1611 to 1626)? Iconography? --Stomme 10:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: National Gallery, Washington ''Assumption''
Talk:Mayflower Centre (Plymouth)

message: The Mayflower Centre was demolished to make way for the Life Centre: a new page is needed for the Life Centre.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpe2015 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harold Loeffelmacher

message: Apparently there's some disagreement between several parties on whether the Minnesota Music Hall of Fame is an appropriate external link or not.  I just wanted to say I'm a neutral party in this matter, and I'll neither add it or delete it from the article. - Itsfullofstars 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minnesota Music Hall of Fame

message: Until a couple of days ago I had never heard of the Six Fat Dutchmen or Harold Loeffelmacher, and I personally don't have a taste for polka music either, but expanding this article and a couple of others related to the genre was an interesting experience.  Picking up some knowledge in a subject one is otherwise unfamiliar is a good reason to be here on Wikipedia.  I'm pretty sure I'm going to leave further expansion of this article to others, but I'll keep it in my watchlist. Cheers - Itsfullofstars 09:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My edits
Talk:Honey Bitter

message: The current plot is basically the one from the ANN article, just reworded a bit. It should be rewritten, or it falls under WP:CP = should be deleted. Ninja neko 19:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and removed plot to avoid copyright issues. Ninja neko 17:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Leila

message: Beirut Lebanon-New Jdeideh-Hekmeh street-Sigma Bldg-1St Floor. www.leila-studios.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.135.14.23 (talk) 10:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Leila Production Studios overwrote the article and demonstrated their "professionalism" by adding a list of their services on this talk page under the heading "leila studios for dubbong". I trimmed it to the above, because of WP:NOTADVERTISING. If they could demonstrate notability according to WP:ORG then a page could be created for Leila Production Studios and linked from this page. – Fayenatic (talk) 14:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leila Studios
Talk:HMS Maenad (J335)

message: There's a disparity here (HMS Maenad (J335)). In the attached photo it clearly shows a vessel marked J435 on the Hull. This article from the Finnish Wiki says the same I.E. HMS Maenad is (J435): https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Maenad_(J435). Comments? Broichmore (talk) 11:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: J335 or J435
Template talk:European Union topics

message: (Why is there no discussion here already? Oh! Silly me.)
Given that the latest Eurobarometer poll shows that only 57% of EU citizens think that their state's membership of the EU is a Good Thing (and that this increase on earlier polls is hailed as a great achievement), shouldn't the template for "Topics on the European Union" point to at least one article that deals with democracy in the European Union? At the moment, the template is simply a road-map for articles about the EU's institutions.  Vinny Burgoo 19:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democratic deficit 

message: Does this really belong in this template? It smells of POV to me..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.167.166.198 (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurabia? 

message: It would seem like a good idea to have a link to Four Freedoms (European Union) - an article which, I accept, needs some work, but I'm not sure whether this fits best into Law, Economics or Society. Thoughts? ElectricLemon (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it should replace Free movement of labour? ElectricLemon (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  i thought 4F was a US concept? -- eiland (talk) 10:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four Freedoms 

message: I suggest adding a section environment, with eg.: European Union Emission Trading Scheme, European Climate Change Programme, European Environment Agency, Renewable energy in the European Union, ??? -- eiland (talk) 10:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environemnt
Talk:Madonna and Child (Duccio, Metropolitan)

message: Can't they just clear up the controversy by analyzing a chip of wood off the back or something?—Chowbok ☠ 22:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carbon Dating?

message: James Beck says that this is forgery of later years (and im pretty convinced by that ). Article is really biased and not neutral either, cos heavily based on what painting owners is saying. And, not suprisingly, they louds it clearly.
Next, it states "This iconic image of Madonna and Child, seen throughout the history of western art". And then "accessible to scholars for only half a century", so ? They are supposing, that this painting is the "mother" of the all other similar paintings ? And that is clearly untrue. Article really needs some other quotations beside painting owners. --Submixster (talk) 23:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Objectivity, neutrality?
Template talk:Member states of the European Union

message: The introducing of the flag at the right just looks ugly. I remove it. Aaker 22:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hi. Please replace the current code with the following, which
#adds a <includeonly> so the template is expanded on its own page;
#converts the above line into below (suggest template's balance then improved);
#uses linewrapping that works more reliably with Firefox as well as other browsers (and reduces the relatively wide gap between the list of links' wrapped lines).
Please also update

to .
Thank you. Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 20:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: See discussion: Template talk:Countries of Europe#Merge of this, CoE and EU templates.- JLogant: 16:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Remove the Member "states by accession" and "by population" from this template. Neither links to a list.  The population list I redirected to the Member state list, which has all the same information plus more, with better updates. The accession redirects to Enlargement of the European Union, which is a more detailed article but, as far as lists go, it's not as good as the main one.  Remember that lists are sortable now, so a lot of "List of A sorted by X/Y/Z" lists can be merged into a single "List of A" with sortable columns. jnestorius(talk) 18:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ADMIN, Please remove the Member states by accession link and by population link. Thanks.- J.Logan`t: 13:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.- J.Logan`t: 11:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove lists 

message: Hi, I've been standardizing the EU templates with the European colours, flags, and a clearer layout, as can be seen in  Template:European Union topics and all other EU templates, bar Parliamentary templates. Could someone do this same with this template? Thanks, YeshuaDavid • Talk • 20:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted your edits. The standard colours should be used and flags violate WP:MOSFLAG. Rettetast (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual update 

message: remove or write uk as a former member of the european union
Chcheetah (talk) 08:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: - The UK is still a member of the European Union - how and when it will leave has yet to be determined - it could take several years Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 June 2016