lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bisexual chic

message: There has been apparent bias in the gutting.  There are different standards for women's bisexuality than men's.  Removal of the information documenting the numerous public women and the few men -post-1980 are an indication of this. 
Also, the gutting removed the historical context of the question of bisexuality/ bisexual chic.Arbol25 (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The information was removed because it was completely unsourced - see above for extensive discussion on this. Can you provide sources? I'm not sure what you mean regarding bias / double standard? Mdwh (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't the double standard be anymore clear?: If you practice sex with both genders and are male, it is treated as something to be ashamed of, a subject not to be addressed (Prince, Morrisey).  If you practice with both and you are female, this is something done up-front without embarrassment.  At worst, there is a tabloid titillation response (witness Madonna, Britney Spears).  Arbol25 (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is indeed a double standard, but I'm not sure how that's related to the restoration of all of the unsourced / original research content? Mdwh (talk) 01:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias in gutting / [[double standard]]s

message: I'm sure that the following wasn't MEANT to be a cheap joke, but please re-read and rephrase:
Musical acts such as Elton John, Mick Jagger, Lou Reed and the androgynous David Bowie made public their experiences with other men, as did celebrities like Marlon Brando and Gore Vidal, Janis Joplin and Joan Baez. 192.85.50.1 (talk) 16:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 
Talk:Astrological Association of Great Britain

message: Member of the Astrological Association Council here, and long term astrologer. I've just updated the page to reflect where the AA is at today. Most of the previous information was out of date, including the contact address. This is my first Wikipedia edit, hope I did it OK
Sasastro (talk) 16:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major update
Talk:Realized eschatology

message: The following passage strikes me as showing a very strong POV.
:This view is attractive to many people, since it reverses the notion that Jesus' second coming is an ominous event, something hardly in keeping with the overall theme of Jesus and his teachings in the canonical gospels. 
The most glaring POV is that the second coming is "ominous". Otherwise, I object to this idea that the gospels have a straight-forward interpretation. AdamRetchless 18:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. I've rephrased the sentence to remove the POV. The article is better for it. --Loremaster 21:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: " Eschatology is therefore not the end of the world but its rebirth instituted by Jesus and continued by his disciples, a historical (rather than transhistorical) phenomenon"
-- Realized Eschatology is most certainly transhistorical, rather than historical, as the article claims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.92.30.65 (talk) 03:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  transhistorisicity
Talk:Zij-i Ilkhani

message: The article begins with: "Zij-i Ilkhani or Ilkhanic Tables (literal translation: 'The Ilkhan Stars'..."  I don't know Persian but the apparent translation of "zij" as "stars" disagrees with the Etymology in Kennedy, where the term "zij" is clearly related to the columns of a table.  Could someone who knows medieval Persian deal with this?  I suspect the literal translation given here may reflect modern Persian usage while "Ilkhanic Tables" reflects medieval usage.  --SteveMcCluskey 18:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literal translation
Talk:Otero Mesa

message: I'm not from New Mexico, and I had never heard of the Otero Mesa until I was directed to this article randomly. I'm working on expanding it, but I'm having trouble finding unbiased sources. If anybody has direction or sources to offer, that'd be greatly appreciated.... Katiedert (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding the Article
Talk:Pinedale, New Mexico

message: Please only list people who qualify as notable under Wikipedia criteria. In general, either the person is already the subject of an article, or they are prominently named in an article (for example, as a member of a band), or you are getting started on writing that article. If the person's connection to Pinedale, New Mexico is not mentioned in their Wikipedia article please include a source citation. If they are notable, have no article, but are prominently named in a Wikipedia article, please use a piped link to that article (and section) from their name.  If you are inserting a name prefatory to writing the article about a notable person, please cite a source here for notability and for their Pinedale, New Mexico connection.  Thanks.  See in particular :Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Lists of people. --Bejnar (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable residents
Talk:Dayanand Anglo-Vedic Badri Narayan Saha Public School

message: Much more required to avoid deletion. Add an infobox and some pics Victuallers 21:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assess 

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: From searching the internet, I could only find one citation that verifies this school exists, and it's not reliable as an isolated source because it's the school's own website: http://bnsdavgrd.org/.
It also looks like when the page was first created in 2007, there were no sources added then, and it wasn't written with a Neutral POV. I'm not sure why or how this article got originally approved with no sources.
Are there any citations that show the existence of this school, or show why it is notable? Otherwise, I think that this should be nominated for deletion soon, since this has been an ongoing problem. Whisperjanes (talk) 03:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed
Talk:De Nobili School, FRI

message: Much more required to avoid deletion. Add reffed text & some pics Victuallers 21:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: Hi, it was nice to see that we have an article about the main school. i was wondering about the branch schools? being an alumni of DNS, Sindri its dishearting to see that our school isnt around. i would have myself created the page but i don't have the factual details so... and the main school even has a website od its own (www.denobili.edu.in) while branch schools r represented in some obscure geocities page which bears no info about the school.
could somebody do something about this. i l be more than glad to help.
66.248.222.34 05:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about the branch schools?? 

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 

message: Since the introduction as well as the major part of the first section was copied verbatim from http://iskul.jharkhandi.com/, a copyright-protected page, I have removed the infringing material. This leaves the article basically broken. Hopefully someone will find the time to make the necessary repairs. __meco (talk) 08:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article corrupted due to excision of copyrighted material
Talk:San Pedro Mountains

message: Unless I'm missing something, the San Pedro Mountains are either identical to, or a subset of, the Sierra Nacimiento, treated here as the Nacimiento Mountains.  The range isn't that large, and different sources seem to have different opinions as to just what part of the Nacimientos the San Pedro Mountains (as opposed to San Pedro Peaks, whose status is clear) are.  A merger therefore seems appropriate, the more so as the few things pointing at this article would do just as well to point to the Nacimientos.  (Original-research disclaimer: I just got back from a trip looking at sites of the Gallina culture and would definitely say that those sites are north of the "Nacimientos," regardless of whether there's a San Pedro range or not; see the Gallina culture article.)  Discuss, please. -- Bill-on-the-Hill 22:23, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger suggested
Talk:Fern Creek High School

message: The Associated Press is reporting that Fern Creek High School is under "lockdown" while police search for a gun that was reportedly seen in the school cafeteria. Just an alert to be on the watch for vandalism and heavy traffic on this article today. - Dravecky (talk) 15:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 20 2008 
Talk:Miller Symphony Hall

message: The text of this section has been copied verbatim from the website of the subject. This goes against copyright and Wikipedia policy. Also the section is written in a non-encyclopedic promotional tone which is inappropriate for a Wikipedia article. This section should be rewritten with appropriate source citations or it should be deleted. Thanks, Markhh (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:Tai Tam Country Park (Quarry Bay Extension)

message: "Why does an extension need to have its own article?" Despite the names they are two country parks. Should this article be revived, along the line of the article on Sai Kung West (Wan Tsai Extension) Country Park? 14.0.236.217 (talk) 11:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose we could just add a section describing the Quarry Bay extension on the main article, then redirect to the section ―sportzpikachu my talkcontribs 03:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  This country park got a lot more visitors than Tai Tam. Like more than double. 203.218.155.184 (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two country parks 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) NOT MOVED User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Tai Tam Country Park (Quarry Bay Extension) →  – per the relevant statute. 203.218.155.184 (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Too late to notice this from WP:WPHK, but probably a ngram would know the common name of the park is " Quarry Bay Country Park" and we usually use common name to fit the WP:CRITERIA. Matthew hk (talk) 00:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

text: you can re-open WP:RM with legit evidence such as WP:RS. But WP:RM usually consider Google Ngram to prove one name is more popular than other. But in some case the article title just made up due to wiki policy e.g. this. The only thing to consider may be all other Hong Kong Country Park use Official name (probably Official name is the common name of those park too) but if using  then it will be the outlier that use WP:Commonname but not official name. Matthew hk (talk) 00:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. 203.218.155.184 (talk) 08:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

text:   What about the en masse renaming of Foo Line and Foo Station of the MTR to lowercase l and s? 203.218.155.184 (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate the lower cap thing. But it was a naming convention formed in WP:VP. Matthew hk (talk) 15:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request
Talk:Sierra Nacimiento

message: I've proposed a merger of San Pedro Mountains into this page, the more so since the article is already taking credit for information about the "San Pedro Mountains."  Does anybody see a good reason why this purported northern extension (which isn't mentioned in all of the sources that I've checked) should have a stand-alone article?  Please discuss. -- Bill-on-the-Hill 22:28, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the proposed merge. The two ranges make sense as a geologic unit, and are often conflated in the literature anyway. Plus both articles are small. -- Spireguy 19:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger suggested
Talk:Satin weave

message: I see this says that sateen is a weft weave while satin is a warp weave, however the page on satin weave says satin is a long staple threads while sateen is the same with short staple threads, or with cotton.
SO, what is it? Is sateen a different weave? A different material (cotton v. silk)? Or a different staple length? I have seen all three definitions in wikipedia, and they don't seem to work together very well.
Well, two do, it could be that satin is made of threads normally given to long staple such as silk, while sateen is short stapled materials such as cotton. However, that tends to argue against this page's definition of sateen. Then again, the wikipedia page on sateen has a definition which contradicts this page's definition as well.
So, since it seems this definition of sateen is in disagreement with every other definition in Wikipedia, I am simply removing this section:
A fabric is a satin if the fabric is warp faced (the fabric predominantly shows warp threads). A fabric is a sateen if it is weft faced meaning only the weft threads show. The float is in the warp or vertical direction for satin, and with sateen the float is in the horizontal or filling direction.
I was going to try to edit it to retain useful information, but I can find nothing that gives s specific name to weft-float fabric, so it was impossible to craft a meaningful paragraph out of the information in that section which was not suspect. As I said earlier, the sateen article says sateen is four-over-one-under which does not agree with this statement at all. And the sateen page makes more sense, as I understand sateen to be basically "satin made of cotton", which this statement contradicts by making sateen some sort of four-under-one-over fabric, which is not supported anywhere I have seen. Even consulting sources outside of Wikipedia, it appears everywhere I can find that sateen is just "satin using cotton". 68.49.147.180 (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:New Mexico statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates 
Talk:The House That Berry Built

message: Placement on an article map, or a google earth link would help. 12.201.7.201 (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is Cockade, Exactly?

message: Good start.  See Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/ArticleTemplate for a suggested layout and template to wikify this page. Gwinva 18:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikifying

message: What does the "IKD" in brackets added by recent edits signify ? RGCorris (talk) 17:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IKD ? 

message: "The novel reveals also the great ease of movement of the English at the beginning of the 20th century." In that it is set in the late 1930s, is "beginning" the correct description ? RGCorris (talk) 09:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. Actually, that whole section needs reliable sources, as it appears to be an editor's personal review of the book. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ease of Movement
Talk:Foreign tax credit

message: The article says "Canadian and U.S. Federal governments allow credits from all foreign levels, while Canadian provinces and U.S. states tend to allow a credit for income taxes paid to other provinces and states, but not for taxes paid to sovereign jurisdictions (countries)". However, non-resiedents, of Canada at least, never pay taxes to a specific province, even for income derived in that province. Does this means that they cannot claim tax credits from a US state where they pay taxes on this income? The article should be more specific. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Income tax credits for states and provinces - unclear 
Talk:TWA Flight 260

message: This article stated "Only after accident-site souvenir-hunters' discovery of the aforementioned RMI . . ." The Fluxgate Compass which supplied the data to the RMI in the cockpit was found by persons involved in the rescue / recovery team who had returned to recover and bury human remains not initially recovered. Their effort was mounted onMay 14. This information is included in the book "The crash of TWA Flight 260" by one of the recovery group not a "souvenir hunter. For details see The crash of TWA Flight 260, by rescue participant Charles M. Williams, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 2010, ISBN978-0-8263-4807-4,  pg 67.
Mark Lincoln  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:360:6670:1438:4CE4:69B0:F804 (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is an error in this account 

message: — Assignment last updated by Acntaos (talk) 01:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies

message: I have removed some facts that I was unable to find sources for. If sources can be provided that back up the claims, I would have no issue adding the information back in. For now though, I am removing the claims.
Removed claims:
- The fact that Captains widow was receiving death threats.
- The fact that pilots were complaining about malfunctioning RMI units. Bpkuhlm (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction - after more research, I found a source that backs up Jean Spong did get harrased, but not death threats. I updated the information and added a citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpkuhlm (talk • contribs) 21:41, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need sources for claims 

message: — Assignment last updated by LizaFranqFrog (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies

message: — Assignment last updated by Sgarcia40 (talk) 07:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies
Talk:List of Mazinger characters

message: I propose merging Aphrodite A into this section as the stand alone article does not cite any real references and may lack notability. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added one more, Baron Ashura has not had ANY references since October 2006. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Support Merge JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:James Douglas, Earl of Angus

message: The title of this article is not good, as there were 2 other people called James Douglas, Earl of Angus.  How do we disambiguate?  How about James Douglas, courtesy Earl of Angus?  How do histories normally handle this? PatGallacher 19:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was he really a Colonel Angus?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.255.26 (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:William J. Brady

message: In mid April 2015 Rms125a@hotmail.com suggested that more citation was needed and tagged the article with  :Template:moresources. I have added two more pinpoint citations to Lavash, and supplied the one citation that had previously been requested by the use of :Template:Citation needed. I have removed the :Template:moresources tag.  If there are specific statements in the article that need a citation, please indicate them by the use of the :Template:Citation needed.  Otherwise, discuss the needs of the article here on the talk page under specific headings. See Help:Using talk pages.  --Bejnar (talk) 18:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More citation
Talk:Chihuahua Trail

message: El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro and Chihuahua Trail seem to be the same trail. Why two articles? 193.11.50.23 (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a subset of the larger trail, but agree that it doesn't need a separate page, so merged (as per August 2014 formal proposal). Klbrain (talk) 09:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro
Talk:F.C. Barreirense

message: I'm proposing this article to be renamed F.C. Barreirense, according to what is observed in all other articles on Portuguese clubs. Joaopais 19:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 16:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Fort Stanton

message: — Assignment last updated by AnonUser126224! (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Writing and Research
Talk:Sue Palmer

message: I've removed the extensive lists of reviews for Toxic Childhood for the following reasons;
* It's unnecessary.  Feel free to summarise the reception and reviews the book garnered.  But a long list of positive reviews borders on advertising.
* Nothing is cited.  If all these reviews said these things they should be cited.
Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Lincoln County Regulators

message: The article fails to include the well known regulators Warren G and Nate Dogg
:Sixteen in the clip and one in the hole
:Nate dogg is about to make some bodies turn cold
:Now they droppin and yellin
:Its a tad bit late
:Nate dogg and warren g had to regulate
The rhythm is the bass and the bass is the treble,
--129.59.8.10 10:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  REGULATOOOORRRSSS! 

message: Shouldn't it mention they were outlaws? User:LK  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.97.1 (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They weren't exactly outlaws, since they were formed by the Law. Some of them became rustlers after the "war", but that doesn't make all of them outlaws. I don't think guys like Richard Brewer, Doc Scurlock or Frank Coe could be called outlaws. De Portago (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Outlaws

message: The alleged cheese factory run by Scurlock and Bowdre was in Arizona. It is unverifiable and very unlikely that Billy Bonney worked there.
Billy Bonney did not arrive in Lincoln until October 1877 and he wasn't with Scurlock and Bowdre upon his arrival. BiographyHound (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual Errors