lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:White Sun of the Desert

message: Nowhere in the article is it stated when the film is set, only where. Presumably it's set in the early or mid-1920s? The lack of a time setting makes it seem like the action is contemporary to 1970, which is misleading. If anyone knows when it is set, can you please add that information?
 62.228.16.248 (talk) 11:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Setting

message: Polish cosmonaut Mirosław Hermaszewski said, that every russian and Interkosmos cosmonaut was obliged to watch "White Sun of the Desert" before flight. For example his captain, Klimuk, had to watch this third time before they flown to space (http://wyborcza.pl/1,75480,5337463,Polak_z_Sojuza.html - atricle in polish). Maybe this version contained some subliminal messages to improve mental condition ? Or it has simply very good influence on the people's mind ? Sorry for my english.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.129.235.109 (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is kind of a semi-official tradition, a lucky charm. How it started is not very clear, at least two versions are mentioned in RuWiki article on the movie. 176.115.39.145 (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have replaced this poster with a DVD cover for two major reasons:
*The poster is primitive and inaccurate (it shows Sukhov on top, whereas Sukhov never rides a horse or shoots a rifle at anyone in the film); the DVD cover portrays him and Sayid much more realistically. 
*I can't find any evidence that the poster was actually used by Moslfilm or Motyl, only that it was drawn for the movie in 1970. Materialscientist (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Poster

message: Something is suspicious with dates in the source cited. The two other films discussed there, By the Lake and  :ru:Обвиняются в убийстве received the 1971 state prize, not 1970. The "ideological" arguments look plausible, but the 1970 state prize went to We'll Live Till Monday, which was extremely popular as well and  can hardly be seen as "ideologically correct": schoolchildren boycott a teacher of English, etc. As far as I understand, nominations for state prizes lagged after the release year for more than 1 year, so maybe only year of nomination may be fixed from other sources. - Altenmann >talk 17:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1970 USSR State Prize
Talk:October: Ten Days That Shook the World

message: This article is not that well developed and should be expanded greatly in more detail than what it currently has.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is not that well developed 

message: The Jean-Claude Conesa quote here contains multiple errors, to the point that I'm wondering if it's a poor translation. Can anyone help with this? Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like a direct Google Translate lift. The line in the source is: "Фильм одновременно становится и рассказом об Истории, и ее составной частью, в том смысле, что его монтаж, его раскадровка, его эстетика — это чистый продукт революционной системы как в показе революции, так и в экзальтированной манере этого показа." Looks like the article was translated (presumably from French) into Russian. Carter (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of quote
Talk:Kuleshov effect

message: This isn't a stub at all. This was the experiment. What more do you want?
(10 December 2006 5:19 PM) Removed a link to a poorly-written, uninsightful article concerning the Kuleshov effect.
Bordwell and Thompson's Film History book says Kuleshov got to the Academy in 1920 and made the experiment in 1921 so I corrected it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neonknights (talk • contribs) 15:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This illustration, from Wikimedia Commons, is probably an inaccurate representation of the Kuleshov experiment and only lists its source as blogs.suntimes.com, which is not verifiable (I searched that site for "Kuleshov" and found nothing). It appears to have been scanned from a book and thus there may be copyright issues, too. 
Since no copies of the original experiment exist, we can be pretty sure that these images are not from the film. The question then becomes, who created this simulation of the experiment?
With all these issues, it seems to me that the image should be deleted from Wikimedia Commons and not included in this article. Or, at the very least, the image should have a disclaimer explaining that it is not from the original experiment.
--Jeremy Butler 13:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading illustration: Should be deleted 

message: I'm no film buff, but shouldn't it say that the INTERMEDIARY shot was changed, not the LAST shot?
24.154.230.116 (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...I'm pretty sure the caption on the example is wrong?
Talk:Red Hat Certification Program

message: I've merged all the Red Hat certifications into one article.  —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 02:47Z
:Good thinking. But it looks as though it needs to be done again. 74.78.116.93 (talk) 09:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Master merge

message: Since the old merger proposal seemed to have been neglected, I'm going to start a new one. I'm proposing to merge the following into this article:
* Red Hat Certified Technician
* Red Hat Certified Engineer
* RHCSS
* Red Hat Certified Datacenter Specialist
* Red Hat Certified Architect
The reasoning remains the same as in 2009. The articles are short and notability is minor. They share the same form, references and external links. Please state your opinion. --Muhandes (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: * Comment - It is legitimate to expand a redirect, even from a Merge, into a valid, notable and sourced article. The problem is that editors expanded them into semi-stubs, which defeats the purpose. Anyway, I keep merged articles in my watchlist, so as long as I'm active I can see if it's done. --Muhandes (talk) 08:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New merger proposal 

message: Article needs info regarding cost of each exam and the price range in the opening lines. Would the range be $400 (RHCT) — $800 (RHCE)? Qwerty800 (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's a good idea. We don't focus on pricing information. There are other more suitable places to look for that kind of information. We're building an encyclopedia here and those kinds of things are not our primary concern. Dawnseeker2000  22:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost 

message: I looked at the source for "GoCertify considers it 'the most prominent Linux certification programs.'"  Following the reference to http://www.redhat.com/certification/, I found this archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20100529051414/http://www.redhat.com/certification which is not the exact cited date, but it is not very long before.  It does not include the quote, and nor does the next one.  I'm not disputing the quote, though it is clumsy.  I did find those words here. I would edit, but I work for Red Hat.  Please add the archive URL to the citation and fix up the quote.  -- ke4roh (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old reference, unsourced quote 

message: Do any of the certificates expire or require ongoing re-certifications? AdmiredSneeze (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certificate Expiration 

message: This information is pretty out of date since RHEL 8, especially the part about RHCE. In particular, I noticed no reference to the current exam needed to get the RHCE, EX294
https://www.redhat.com/en/services/certification/rhce
XG33Kx (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates needed for RHEL 8/EX294/etc.
Talk:Don Pedro Island State Park

message: The sources were unclear on location and accessibilty. On the one hand, it can only be reached by boat. On the other, it is not alone on the island.
Mikereichold 23:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  location and accessibility 
Talk:Lincoln Zephyr

message: Lincoln Zephyr
I have added this "compatible" 3D image of a 1939 Lincoln Zephyr. As you see, it is a truly clean regular picture, but if you look at it with simple Red-Cyan glasses it turns to 3D. This is a serious plus factor in getting kids interested in the topics on Wikipedia, in my opinion. Please leave this image up until several people form a consenus to remove it. There are
several sites on line that offer free paper glasses, and millions were handed out for "Spy Kids 3D" and other films.Nativeborncal 02:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Produced only one year, not needed, Lincoln MKZ is basically the same car with a different name Laxplayer630 21:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the discussion at Talk:Lincoln_MKZ#Merger I have fixed the redirect here to go to the classic car with the name of Lincoln Zephyr.  There is a  at the top of that article saying .  Toddst1 (talk) 17:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with  Lincoln MKZ
Talk:Erich Kleiber

message: Added piece on how he became music director at Berlin State Opera.Alloco1 02:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 'notes' in this article are taken directly or indirectly from a copyrighted article I wrote for Gramophone magazine ('Free Radical', Gramophone, vol. 80 no. 956, August 2002, pp 36-7). At the very least, this source should be acknowledged and the fact that these paragraphs are quotes should be apecified. As I'm not au-fait with editing Wikipedia artivles, I'd be very grateful if someone who is could take appropriate action. Many thanks. Mark Audus
:If the text is copyrighted it should be deleted. User Tvitchev added the Notes in the last edit to the article. Is there any on-line version of your article at Gramophone? If so, it could be linked as an external source. --Mariano(t/c) 17:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notes 
Talk:Inspector Clouseau (film)

message: There's an unsourced statement that Edwards and Sellers vowed never to work together again after A Shot in the Dark, but the article establishes that the two were making The Party together, which is why neither could be involved in this film. So which is it? 96.51.188.175 (talk) 04:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency
Talk:The Return of the Pink Panther

message: The article says that the tagline was "you can rest assured that there's trouble etc". This appears to be sourced from the IMDB (where it's rendered as "you may rest assured" etc). Lots of websites repeat this verbatim in a way that is obviously copied from the IMDB and Wikipedia. But I can't find a single poster or video cover or advert that has this quote, either contemporary or modern. They either have the lengthy THE GREAT RETURNS: gag, or some generic text about Peter Sellers returning in the role. Where was the IMDB's tagline used? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagline
Talk:The Pink Panther Strikes Again

message: "Sellers was ailing both mentally and physically..."
Anybody like to take a stab at what "ailing" means? Can you get an ointment for it? Here we have a double helping, mental and physical. Journalists have so much to answer for... --Stevouk (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Journalese 

message: In this movie, there's a stunt where a character escapes from a train by grabbing onto the rails of a helicopter and being flown away. At the time, it was considered very impressive, and was done for real by the stuntman. Could someone look into it and add something about it? - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The helicopter stunt 

message: I understand and respect the desire to minimize lists of trivia, but as numerous other cinematic references are noted in the article, would it be appropriate to mention that the scene (scenes?) where the lunatic Dreyfus is playing a pipe organ reference his turn as the Phantom in the 1962 version of Phantom of the Opera? PurpleChez (talk) 20:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phantom 

message: The fictionalised version of President Ford in the film is shown as (1) obsessed with football and (2) tripping and falling over as he steps into the Oval Office, the latter presumably being a reference to the much replayed (and much parodied by Chevy Chase) time when he stumbled and fell down the steps of Air Force One. A cultural reference which audiences would have "got" and laughed at the time, but which most people would miss nowadays.
I'm a bit reluctant to waste my time posting this, as somebody will delete it for being "uncited". It might be worth posting if somebody has a third-party commentary to which it can be cited.Paulturtle (talk) 03:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  President Ford parody
Talk:Revenge of the Pink Panther

message: Have cleaned up the article, editing and fixing the focus on tangential material in the plot section. Dingdongalistic 10:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: He was disintegrated int he previous film.  At the time, I remember a few reviews stating "... Dreyfus's miraculous return ..." HammerFilmFan (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  no explanation of Dreyfus's miraculous return?
Talk:Trail of the Pink Panther

message: Why does the article say:
"the film contains no original material apart from the animated opening titles, created by DePatie-Freleng Enterprises."
But then goes on to discuss footage of a reporter conducting interviews with people in order to provide segues to flashbacks?  Weren't all of these interviews original material?  Joanna Lumley, Robert Loggia, Richard Mulligan.... Wasn't all of their footage new for this production?  And what about the previously unseen footage of the late Peter Sellers?.... that cannot be considered original material?  I think that it can.  And I think somebody screwed up real good by writing that line that I quoted above.  Just because Peter Sellers died before production began does not in any way justify claiming that the film contains no original material.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.155.229 (talk) 09:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Elder (Latter Day Saints)

message: I've often thought it ironic that the common term "elder", being pre-empted in the context of the LDS faith, sometimes conflicts with its standard meaning. 
I have many times invited LDS missionaries into my home, shared food and work and study and prayer and fellowship with them. They are firmly insistant that they not yield up their first names, leaving only the recourse of referring to them in terms like "Elder Jones". They're 18 or so. I'm almost 60. In some cases I know more about some aspects of their faith than they do. 
This poses a certain dynamic tension around the title which I think deserves mention. I'm not sure if it should be here or in an article on the LDS Mission.
Roger 19:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction from common usage. 

message: The current version includes the sentence: "All adult men in the ward, whether they are faithful or not, are assigned to either the Elders Quorum or the High Priests Group as directed by the Bishop."  It's unclear what is meant by "faithful" here-- it seems to be something apart from the expected meaning in an LDS article (i.e., a believer in the LDS teachings), since it concerns intra-church governance.  No special meaning for this term is given in the linked "ward" article, either. 108.195.5.113 (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably just means "attending". All adult men in the ward are assigned to one or the other groups, whether or not they attend church meetings. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear use of term "faithful" 

message: Hello.
Can any Elder serve as a hospital chaplain? Or is this service reserved to Bishops and Missionaries? Prsaucer1958 (talk) 00:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elders as Chaplains 

message: It looks like some of this article's incomplete. The tag "1830 in religion" was added and there's nothing pertaining specifically to 1830 in the article. Was this a false positive someone made? 67.8.227.76 (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the references, the office was instituted in 1830. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete section?
Talk:Cat Ballou

message: I know this may be considered nitpicking, but the wikipedia article itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann-Margret says Ann-Margret's manager turned the role of Cat Ballou down without telling her.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.40.36 (talk) 12:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, it's unsourced there. I'll see what I can find. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source so I added it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Notes 

message: Consolidation is a proper name and is capitalized. http://www.steamlocomotive.com/misc/wheels.php  http://www.scsra.org/library/whyte.html  http://www.llarson.com/steam/wheel_arrangements.htm   Mark Sublette
:Thanks, wasn't aware of that, thought it was a description. BMK (talk) 20:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper Name
Talk:Arthur (1981 film)

message: The article states the movie was at position 4 on the years gross chart, yet the 1981 in film states it as number 7. Is this an inconsistency, or is the 4th for global? Peter 10:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gross position? 

message: I thought you are gonna call this a drama film! You have it in the category "comedy films". Can you call this a dramedy film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.225.234 (talk) 20:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Does anyone have a source for the statement that the screenplay was based on Jeeves and Wooster characters?  Rojomoke (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jeeves & Wooster]] 

message: Would it be reasonable to make a reference in this article (probably in the opening paragraph), that this is a Screwball comedy film? I personally haven't done any research, but perhaps someone else interested in this film could find a reference that qualifies it as this particular genre. Crackersgreen (talk) 23:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Screwball Comedy Film?
Talk:Mr. Deeds Goes to Town

message: Since this page was 41 kilobytes long, it was suggested that older discussions should be moved into an archive subpage. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 04:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion archived

message: It seems that someone has found the 666 reference in this movie.  Well done.--75.55.38.69 (talk) 00:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It Has Been Found

message: this film was made under the studio system so while I understand there was a 6 month delay in Gary Cooper being able to start the project, I don't see how this would have resulted in the 100thousand cost, they would have just made another studio picture in the meantime, also there is no reference for this figure so citation would be neededJKitich (talk) 14:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an unprecedented figure but well-documented. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  film delay 

message: The following information is either contradictory or unclear:
Based on the 1935 short story Opera Hat by Clarence Budington Kelland, which appeared in serial form in The American Magazine, the screenplay was written by Robert Riskin in his fifth collaboration with Frank Capra.[2][3]
This was the seventh of 12 films on which Capra collaborated with screenwriter Robert Riskin, who played a key role in the development of Capra's directorial style.''
Was this their fifth collaboration or their seventh? Was Riskin's involvement in two earlier films in a role other then that of screenwriter? 850 C (talk) 03:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riskin 
Talk:Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House

message: "spawned a number of ... semi-remakes" ??? Who wrote this tripe? Or, Let's go with that,and prepend, "A Semi-Remake Spawned by 1942's 'George Washington Slept Here' (w/ Jack Benny and Ann Sheridan)."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.226.208.48 (talk) 03:25, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this likely. George Washington Slept Here (1942) was based on a play by Moss Hart and George S. Kaufman. What was 'Mr. Blandings' based on, if not 'George Washington'? We need a reference for this. David Spector (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote this 

message: I don't recall Loy's character having an affair with Douglas's. Clarityfiend 02:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loy's Affair With Douglas
Talk:Operation Petticoat

message: I thought the Sea Tiger only had one engine running until use of the girdle to get a second operational?
Engines Three and Four were used for Engine One and Two parts...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.136.117 (talk) 03:09, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: One engine or Two

message: Is there a reason the TV series doesn't have its own article? It would be no more of a stub than many TV shows. Krychek (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV series
Talk:High Time (film)

message: I don't know if someone did a cut-and-paste of some long summary, but this plot does not seem like something from an encyclopedia. "The academic rigors are always fuel for comedy and camaraderie" is someone's opinion, and not just a summary.
I've never seen this film, so I'm not able to say what it's about, but someone should consider toning this plot down to just the story line, and leave out the flowery wording. There are no references in the long section, so it's hard to guess where the plot came from. Karenthewriter (talk) 07:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot not very encyclopedic