lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hertford College, Oxford

message: The lists of students and fellows are growing quite large. Since Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, I will remove everyone without a Wikipedia page, as well as people who just don't seem that important, unless someone with a better knowledge of these people and what they have done for the world gets there first. asyndeton 21:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 

message: What is the Hertford College grace?  It would be good to see this somewhere in the article, as in the Jesus College, Cambridge entry here. Greylin (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grace 

message: The history of the college is almost exclusively concerned with the buildings.  Is there anyone who could expand this or add a new section to detail its evolving academic role and structure?  For instance John Donne entered the college when he was 11 years old.  Was this the normal age for entry of students?  How was entry gained?  What was the cost of enrollment, an so on?  At present the section on Hart Hall reads rather like a handbook for tourists.  IMO it would be very helpful for readers to have the architecture and estate issues separated from the institutional and academic ones. LookingGlass (talk) 09:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic history 

message: I have linked List of Honorary Fellows of Hertford College, Oxford to Hertford College, Oxford, but the 2 articles have almost identical lists so they should be combined in one location. Generally the list of honorary fellows of an Oxford College is a separate article to save space in the main article.TSventon (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, there is no need for duplication of the list Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honorary fellows 

message: Pinging  as you wrote some of the Magdalen Hall content.
The Magdalen Hall alumni subsection is "Magdalen Hall (1448–1874)" which conflates the two Magdalen Halls. (List of alumni of Hertford College, Oxford and List of Principals of Hertford College, Oxford are similar.) I would suggest replacing 1448 with another date, possibly 1480 as that is the first date in the list of principals of Magdalen Hall, but then the foundation date in the info box should probably be updated as well. 
The alumni section is inconsistent with the "Magdalen Hall" section, which begins "Magdalen Hall was founded around 1490 on a site to the west of Magdalen College and next to Magdalen's grammar school. The site is now Magdalen's St Swithun's quadrangle. It took the name of an earlier Magdalen Hall in the High Street, which was founded by William Waynflete in 1448 and then closed on the opening of Magdalen College in 1458."
I have been discussing Magdalen Hall content at Talk:Magdalen_College,_Oxford#Magdalen_Hall as JCrue has been expanding the Magdalen College article. TSventon (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magdalen Hall
Talk:A.F.S.K. Hom Tov

message: A.F.S.K. Hom Tov does not have a website and has not issued any news since 2006. The company never published the patent number of its claimed patent.Jdkag (talk) 00:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The patent is this one. Beagel (talk) 20:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, that true. It seems that the described process, although patented, may be just a hype. I even think if the company meets WP:CORP notability guidelines.  However, it seems that the company also had earlier media coverage. Beagel (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In Israel's listing of corporations, address of Hom Tov is same as that for A.F.S.K. Called A.F.S.K., they said that Feldman is no longer involved and that there is no longer anyone handling Hom Tov (which seems to have operated from A.F.S.K. offices in 2006). I called Glazer Investments and was told that Glazer's investment was never finalized. Here's the report that seems to have been inaccurate:
In 2006, 70% of the company shares was acquired by the group of investors led by Israeli businessman Ofer Glazer.
Jdkag (talk) 19:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

text: They are still a registered company in Israel and it seems that they still own the IP to their technique. I wouldn't nominate to delete until there was solid evidence that they had closed. I only wanted to clarify that they are not doing any active development. Jdkag (talk) 16:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Activity
Talk:Kellogg College, Oxford

message: Kellogs college should be described in the article as a constituent college? In practice they are a college, and are named "College", but according to the University statuses, they are a society, not a college.--MiguelMadeira (talk) 12:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The same issue was raised in Talk:St Cross College, Oxford and discussed on that page to avoid repetition.TSventon (talk) 12:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constituent college?
Talk:Blue Triangle

message: London Bus Route 362 are operated by Blue Triangle so please can you go and change it? C.bonnick 23:53, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Bus Routes 
Talk:RedR

message: RedR is certainly notable enough to be in Wikipedia. It is an organisation which trains most of the technical staff for organisations like Oxfam, VSO, Tearfund, Christian Aid, Merlin, and countless others of the world's best know aid agencies, and has for nearly 30 years supplied the people which save lives after disasters by providing water, shelter, food, logistics, health care and more.
Without RedR, situations like the Rwanda refugee crisis after the genocide, the boxing day tsunami and countless other disasters would be immeasurably worse because there would be no qualified people to deal with the problems.
It is not a well-known organisation, because it supports the work of others, but the impact of its work is significant, and it certainly shouldn't be deleted from wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkn20 (talk • contribs) 
:Agreed - the article needs to be sourced, but it shouldn't be hard. RedR would no doubt know of writeups they've received, so I'll email them and ask them to add to this talk page. --Chriswaterguy talk 04:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Into the Fire (Thirteen Senses song)

message: :Image:13s into the fire.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:13s into the fire.jpg
Talk:Doc Pomus

message: Earlier today, I removed a long and random list of people who have performed Doc Pomus' songs. I've done this in general on articles of prolifically recorded composers and such; for example, George Gershwin or Harold Arlen's songs have been performed by everyone who has ever done a standard. It's OR to cherry pick a sample of the huge number of artists who have performed Pomus', or Gershwin's, or Arlen's songs. We might, perhaps, be able to say "According to Pomus expert XXX, the definitive recordings of Doc Pomus have been by YYY and ZZZ". But otherwise, it's an unhelpful paragraph in the article. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long lists of performers 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Goddess Rosemary

message: I presume that the page blanking of this discussion made by the admin was done because User:Goddess Rosemary requested it.  Yet I believe that to have been a completely illegitimate decision.  Even presuming that User:Goddess Rosemary is, indeed, Rosemary Delain (I don't think, for example, that anyone would take the assertions of a "User:GeorgeBush" at his naked word), there is nothing in Wikipedia policy conveying ownership of her article, let alone any discussions about the same, to her ... certainly the whole AfD debate would have been moot were that the case!  I've restored the blanked archive.  Ravenswing 13:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you take this to deletion reveiw. This seems to be a legit move but I could be wrong. The closing editor was assuming good faith on her part and the policy consensus was delete anyway. I'm not really seeing the problem as the proper end result was reached, the history of the debate is still avaiable and the article creators are at least contented. NeoFreak 13:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a courtesy blanking because User:Goddess Rosemary is the creator of the article. The person seems to be troubled over the allegations of advertising, so I assumed good faith and made a courtesy blanking (which was attempted earlier, but was reverted because the debate wasn't closed). utcursch | talk 13:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, the precedence and policy is there to support this. Ravenswing, this doesn't have to be reviewed further does it? NeoFreak 13:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and put this back to the courtesy blanked version.  I agree with utcursch an neofreak; we can accommodate this simple request.  Everything is in the history and I just don't see a reason to poke the subject in the eye with a pointy stick after what was apparently a somewhat difficult AfD process for them to go through.--Isotope23 15:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admin page blanking
Talk:Saudi National Bank

message: I challenged material that was not cited, and deleted it. According to wikipedia policy. An editor restored it - one of FOUR such restores by him of uncited deleted material today - without proper footnotes. 
That is not allowed. See WP:CHALLENGE. "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." Also -- "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." --2604:2000:E016:A700:38EE:F08:8153:25B (talk) 21:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore of uncited material 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: National Commercial Bank (Saudi Arabia) →  – In April 2021, Samba merged with NCB, and it was renamed as Saudi National Bank on, 1 April 2021 JohnnyPedro1998 (talk) 00:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Saudi Arabia has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 13:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 September 2022
Talk:History of the National Register of Historic Places

message: I created this article as part of the NRHP project's collaboration on National Register of Historic Places. I will section off notes I make in relation to that below.
===Issues===
As this article is an offshoot from a section I put together for the collaboration on the NRHP page it isn't up to all the Wiki's standards. I will note issues here as I notice and/or recall them.
*Lead expansion per WP:LEAD
*Article has been called "bureaucratic," in what ways and how can this be fixed, additional input needed. IvoShandor 06:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Collaboration

message: As this article is an offshoot from a section I put together for the collaboration on the NRHP page it isn't up to all the Wiki's standards. I will note issues here as I notice and/or recall them.
*Lead expansion per WP:LEAD
*Article has been called "bureaucratic," in what ways and how can this be fixed, additional input needed. IvoShandor 06:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:List of Shinto shrines in Taiwan

message: Can someone find the romanization for the following:
*円山水
*大湖
*秀水
*能高
*大甲
*新営
*五間厝
*曾文
*鳳山
*加走湾
*寿神社
— Nrtm81 12:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Klassenverhältnisse

message: I corrected a fact in regards to the shot of the Statue of Liberty at the beginning of the film. The original author had stated that it was shot in Paris. I have linked to an interview with the filmmakers in which they state they shot the shot in the US. -TF  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.193.175.194 (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

message: “As soon as he boards the ship, he encounters a discontented stoker …” As soon as he boards the ship ? Sorry. No. Karl is just about to leave the ship (shot 2: the statue of Liberty in the port of New York) when he realizes that he has forgotten his umbrella (shot 1: Karl: „My umbrella!“). James Krug (talk) 16:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot-1 

message: “To Karl's surprise, the ship's captain turns out to be his uncle, ... ”- Sorry. No. Karl’s uncle (Mario Adorf) is present during the dispute in the captain’s (Klaus Traube) room, but he is not the captain of the ship. James Krug (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot-2
Talk:Al-Malkiyya

message: Morris has it as Malikiyya Birth p 180 etc etc  Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malikiyya or Malkiyya 

message: Hi guys, I can understand this might be a polemic issue, but shouldn't it say to which country it belongs today? 
I don't care about History, rights or wrongs, but the fact is that if I want to travel there, which country should I go to?
It took me a while to find out that it belongs (or is under the occupation of, I don't care) Israel, and I think this should be stated somehow. Otherwise, the article is clearly incomplete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.164.255 (talk) 20:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belongs to Israel 

message: Some anon is inserting this into multiple articles:
:   Despite that this village was placed on the Israeli side of the Blue Line by the United Nations in the year 2000, the Lebanese government, contrary to international law, still demands the return of this village.
How can a 1999 statement be in violation of a 2000 agreement?  And how can a press release of someone who hasn't been in the government since 2000 be evidence for government policy in 2013?  The answer in both cases is obvious.  As for the 2001 source, it says "the part of this village which is situated within the Lebanese territories" thus contradicting the claim. Zerotalk 05:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing some rubbish
Talk:Treaty of Constantinople (1700)

message: In the original Slavic language treaty, it refers to the people of Muscovites and Moscow State.￼
When it comes to the pilgrimage to the Holy City, Moscow people and Russian people are written separately in the contract. Because under "russian" word in those days it was used for modern Ukrainians.
For expample i  Article 2 written "moscovites and Cossacks". 
In Article 5 written "Zaporizhian Sich which in areas of Moscovian state".
In Article 12 When it comes to visiting the holy city, it is written that Moscovian and russian (russian/rusines/ruthenians means Ukrainian in those times) the clergy had the right to visit without a license to visit for free. 
so, it's obviously that Moscovian people doesn't think in those time that they are "russian". Because they wrote about themselves separately in original document!!! 
https://ru.m.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80_(1700) Bodia1406 (talk) 05:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the people and the state does not correspond to the one in the Treaty
Talk:Campion Hall, Oxford

message: Would Campion Hall potentially admit women? According to the article it was established 'specifically to allow those with a commitment to the religious life to study within the university' - would that include nuns? I'm just testing a claim that St Benet's Hall is the only remaining institution of Oxford which only admits men for undergraduate degrees. --212.44.10.10 (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add by way of explanation that both Campion Hall and St. Benet's originally had a similar purpose: to allow men vowed to a particular form of religious life to pursue study at Oxford while still maintaining their religious lifestyle.  At Campion Hall, this continues today unchanged.  St. Benet's has evolved, however: originally it was only for monks who needed to study at Oxford.  At that time, most monks entered the monastery around age 18, and needed a degree in order to become teachers in the monastery schools.  Today, fewer monks actually teach in monastery schools, and, more importantly, most men become monks rather later in life, after already having done their university education.  So it is St. Benet's that has evolved, in taking on non-monastic students, while Campion Hall is better viewed as "a special mechanism to allow Roman Catholic priests to be involved in Oxford University" rather than as "a hall which doesn't admit women".  Its purpose is far more specialised (as is seen by the fact that the hall would not admit most men, either). 
--Marlow4 01:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed Sex? 
Talk:Greyfriars, Oxford

message: The student life part probably needs to go, and perhaps a section on the closure of the (former) PPH to students needs to be more fully explained.
69.143.106.43 (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Kung Pow 2: Tongue of Fury

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Based on the discussion at Talk:Kung_Pow!_Enter_the_Fist#Merger_proposal, I've changed this to a redirect.  All sourceable information was already in the Kung Pow! article. --Roger McCoy 08:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:William Croft

message: I wanted to make a note in the article that musicologists now believe that the famous piece "Ground in C Minor" often attributed to Purcell was actually composed and published by W. Croft, but I could not find sources online. Help?
:Have a read through the comments here for some ideas and theories. There are many opinions as to the attribution, however without the support of a reliable source WP should not be publishing opinions. Of course, that hasn't stopped the editors in this WP article (and I added the "citation needed" tag there). I think there may be some information in the Early Music article: , however you need a subscription to read it in entirety. GFHandel ♬  22:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ground in C Minor
Talk:Kerala Education Act 1958 (Act 6 of 1959)

message: If I've read Guha correctly, the bill did become law : the assembly did pass the bill (in 1958) and the president did assent to it (in febraury 1959), after an advice from the supreme court.
The act (as amended) can be found at ; it's styled THE KERALA EDUCATION ACT 1958 (ACT 6 OF 1959).
----Bancki (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not 'Kerala Education Act 1958' ?
Talk:Ernakulam Junction

message: The section "First in Kerala" is completely un-encyclopedic. It is not worthy to mention the starting date of ATM installation or cybercafe. The "integrated surveillance post" can be moved to Other Facilities available.  Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 09:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify : First in Kerala
Talk:Wilton House

message: This article appears to be written in a fairly unencyclopedic tone. In particular, it suffers from asking rhetorical questions in several places, which is not advisable. I'll quite happily have a go at editing it, but if somebody is actively maintaining it, then they would be better equipt to sort it out. Bob talk 00:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I don't have a problem with a rhetorical question in the context they are placed here.  However, I wrote this years ago amd it has been much edited since - so do what you like, no problem to me but remeber it is attempting to explainon one of architecture's unsolved mysteries. Giano 07:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic tone

message: "a priory founded by King Egbert circa 871": since Egbert of Wessex died in 839, there must be something off here... Ælfgar (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egbert 
Talk:Kadakkal

message: Kadakkal. Details mentioned here needs to be protected since many spammers trying to delete datas added and modified here. 2001:8F8:1629:8EC:F166:6F7F:1BC:8454 (talk) 20:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2021 

message: 2001:8F8:1629:8EC:F166:6F7F:1BC:8454 (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2021 

message: i would like to add more information's about this place Jithujithus (talk) 13:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 July 2021 

message: some on repeatedly deleting the data added go the page after my many days of effort and time. 2001:8F8:1C3B:1C72:DD53:9F62:262:98B (talk) 10:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not requested a change.Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 10:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2023
Talk:Our Sunday Visitor

message: A famous church  publication--just needs expansion. DGG 00:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've made some copyedits, but the article is sourced only from the newspaper's self-history and from a one-paragraph description on catholichistory.net which appears to have been drawn from the OSV site. Additional sources are needed - I'll see what I can find. FemmeBrulee 00:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The redirect The Catholic Answer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Catholic Answer]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kalakaumudi

message: From the article
Is wikipedia is a database to store the names of employess of a news magazine? Mentioning the name of chief editor and managining is acceptable. 
But how the the other names like 'P.Sasidharan alias Piravanthoor Sasi, AR Rajiv, P Ravikumar,P.Suresh Babu alias Suresh Piravanthoor, Yesudas Williams, Beena Ranjini, Sebin A. Jacob, AM Divakaran, Kattoor Murali, Roy, Kavitha' will increase to the encylclopaedic value of this article. --Shijualex (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)