lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 16, 2006

message: A humble suggestion (and if it's a religiously insensitive one, forgive me):  as this is Easter Sunday for Catholics and Protestants (the arguably #1 holy day for a significant minority of the world's population), might it be more appropriate to have a featured article that addresses some aspect of Christian belief or practice?  I would certainly personally agree with highlighting other major faiths once annually in a similar way, but perhaps it would clutter up the calendar too much.  We have a small stable of religious FAs that would do...of those never featured, I admit the two clearly Christian entries are likely too controversial (Fred Phelps) and likely too obscure (Presuppositional apologetics), but given that some of the articles previously spotlighted haven't been on the Main Page in over a year and a half (Anno Domini, for instance) I think it wouldn't be a travesty to have them up again.  Again, if this is ridiculously insensitive, forgive me, please (I have, after all, no objections to Sverre Sigurdsson or his fans :-).  I just think it might be an appropriate moment to spotlight our excellent neutral articles in the general area of Christianity, given that "casual inquirer" traffic on that day might be slightly more religious in nature than usual (given the high amount of religious TV programming and the increased levels of church attendance that traditionally accompany that day). Jwrosenzweig 05:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally marking events with related Features are frowned upon, they're pretty tacky.  65.95.124.63 02:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about (Saint) Joan of Arc, which I originally put in the religion section, and it got moved, but I've been meaning to move it back? Raul654 02:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the anon's comment about tackiness is an honest one, I would want to be a bit careful about advocating too strongly for such a thing.  But I think Joan would be a good choice--it's not like having Easter be the fatured article or Jesus (which I agree might feel a little too on-the-nose), but it might catch a little more attention from a passerby on that particular day.  If you'd be happy with that, Raul, I'd certainly like to see it. Jwrosenzweig 04:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Suburban Commando

message: The other Henchmen with Mark Calaway was NOT "Brutus Beefcake" Ed Leslie.
Wasnt it used in I saw Mommy Kissing Santa Clause?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.73.84.85 (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Henchman

message: Somebody added information that a sequel was announced in January 2011, but there's no source linked. Anybody have any actual info, or is this vandalism? JasonTerminator (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I searched for sources about a sequel, but there are none. I think it is just vandalism, and I've removed the passage. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel rumor? 

message: Never saw the movie, and the info is not provided in the article. I suppose Hulk Hogan?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.155.69.126 (talk) 12:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who plays Shep? 

message: The box office figures on this page seem wildly inaccurate. Box Office Mojo, BoxOffice.com, and the-numbers.com say the movie grossed $6,948,721, not $21 million.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzers1 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box office figures? 

message: I came across this image http://www.zupimages.net/up/2/208590576.jpg which looks like alternate cover art or something. Does anyone know if the film was ever released under this name? 64.231.169.63 (talk) 06:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Space Commando]]
Talk:Spider-Man 3 (video game)

message: So many things wrong: the plots for each console's story are too...damn...long! It even includes monologuing by Peter Parker, just for kicks I guess. I think some citations are re-used, because the editor wasn't sure when to use them and how. The gameplay provides no referencing in the gameplay section, which makes this article abundant in original research, and I think I even saw a comparison with Metroid Prime 3 even though the reference doesn't mention that game at all!
I'm adding tags that indicate the page needs to be fixed. -NowIsntItTime(chats)(doings) 20:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues 

message: The page has no development section which is weird, here’s development
Spider-Man 3 started development all the way back into 2004
Jamie Fristrom (person who made the combat system for 2) had developed stealth sections for the game, they were cut because they were ‘too boring’
Black cat was an intended character, you can still find leftovers of her character in the pc version. The pc version has her music in the files and pictures have surfaced of it.
Iron man was also intended for Spider-Man 3, concept art has been found of him in game files. Another cut out reference to other marvel characters is in a deleted mission Spider-Man says “Captain America, eat your heart out.”
Chad Moore who’s an artist on the game originally intended for a photo realistic look to the game 75.118.180.211 (talk) 09:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development
Talk:Super Monkey Ball Adventure

message: This article definitely needs a re-write. I must add it to my list of things to do. Any help to improve the article to comply with wikipedia standards would be appreciated. Knuckles sonic8 20:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: I think info is well here to bring it to B class, or just maybe, GA status. The only things that need to be completed are:
*Sources definitely 
*Party Game detail 
*More plot info
*Maybe more gameplay describing
I'll try to add as much as a I can. If there are sources not on the article in the next few days, please put them here. Thanks. --Hasek is the best 21:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class status 
Talk:Mount Lofty Ranges

message: Does anybody have an authoritative reference for the highest point in the Mount Lofty Ranges? Perhaps what we really need is a well-defined (geological?) boundary between the Mount Lofty Ranges and the Flinders Ranges. The internet seems not to be useful for the purpose. I could find ample evidence that Mount Bryan is taller than Mount Lofty, but conflicting pages as to which is the highest in the Mount Lofty Ranges. This pages says the Mount Lofty Ranges extend "...northward to meet the Flinders Ranges north of Burra" which is exactly where Mount Bryan is. --Scott Davis Talk 14:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Scott, I just re-wrote the article before reading the talk page, and have addressed exactly that situation, heh. Bascially everything east of the Clare-Wilmington road are the Mount Lofty Ranges; the Flinders are to the west and north. It's a grey area around Orroroo, and I'd have to go back to my geology studies to confirm, but Mount Bryan is unquestionably part of the Mount Lofty Ranges, and the highest point. I've split the article into two parts to reflect the fact that when most locals talk about the "Mount Lofty Ranges" they mean the South Mount Lofty Ranges. I'm not sure that that's the best way to do it, but it'll have to do for now. Cheers! Itsonlyme 22:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

text: (There doesn't really seem to be a well-defined geological boundary between the two ranges. Both are made up of generally the same strata, and outcrops of the same formation are to be found everywhere: e.g. the cliffs at Hallett Cove are the Brachina Formation, also to be found as far north as Leigh Creek. Perhaps we should just draw the north-western edge of the Mt Lofty Ranges at the Campbell Range near Jamestown and the Pekina Range near Orroroo. Not that anybody cares, I'm sure.)   Itsonlyme 17:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest point
Talk:Warpath (video game)

message: I removed the statement "and the Havok physics engine" in technology, I went on the Havok website, and it wasn't in the Titles list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dexahecimal (talk • contribs) 02:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Havok Physics 

message: The Warpath series of computer games has existed since about 1994/95 and is still being added to.  This series is different from the game listed on this page, which sprung up despite the name already being taken and copyrighted.  The real Warpath is here. -- 134.225.165.163 (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior Art 

message: Warpath was also the name of shareware game released for Windows 3.x long, long, before this one:
http://www.synthetic-reality.com/warpath.htm
It might be worth pointing that out in the article. GrimmC (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 3.1 Game
Talk:Slant (handwriting)

message: attention handwriting expert wikipedians:
you might have preferred slant (graphonomics)? I dunno. 
everyone:
I think the concept of slant (bias) is pretty important. when I found that there was a slant fanzine and a slant book (novel?) I though slant should be the disambig. that's just me. KzzRzzKnocker 05:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:HOPE Scholarship

message: Man, this article is really bad. Even as a complete beginner editor I know this article is really bad. Perhaps, I will try to improve on it. No promises though, but I will look in some way to improve the history section. NothingMoreThanThis (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pet Project To Improve? 

message: after gathering sources and starting a draft for the history and criticism subsection, I feel like some subsection should be deleted. It really should be: Awards, Awards History, and Application Procedures. 
I understand some poor soul might use Wikipedia to find out his eligibility to HOPE but there are better resources than this. 
There are also some bad plagiarism. It very obvious most of the history section is copied in from this site: https://gbpi.org/a-brief-history-of-hope/
Perhaps in the future, when it is better when will add it back. But still, I feel like it out of a place in a Wikipedia.  
That all. I am warning y'all this page is going to have some major changes. NothingMoreThanThis (talk) 06:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a state financial aid site. Agree or Disagree? and Plagiarism.
Talk:Ben Sherman

message: One look at this article should convince anyone that it needs to be removed or completely rewritten. Ben Sherman Group Limited is obviously using Wikipedia as a medium for advertising. -unsigned
*That advertising-style version of the article was written by User:BenShermanHQ. I have reverted the article to the proper version.Spylab (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: How dare you delete the reference from Only Fools and Horses? It's just as relevant and a historical fact as anything else.
:If it is relevant its significance will have been discussed in a independent source - if you can find such critical commentary in a reliable source then it can be included. The reason it has been removed is that it is unsourced trivia which includes POV statements and does not meet the guidelines for inclusion. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: In popular culture

message: I added this to Category:Clothing brands of the United Kingdom which I think is accurate -- however the category structure here seems to have some redundancies.  Also, with the various acquisitions, is it "still" a British brand? Arided (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: Aren't Ben Sherman shirts usually brightly checkered? Maikel (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Checks
Talk:Kuffs

message: in the trivia section it denotes a movie mistake... that is not trivia.
additionally, what relevance is it that JoVovich was 17 at the time of filming? also the remark that it is "not necessarily possible" for a real person to be 17 and in college? this does happen, and more often than whoever wrote that would like to think.
~209.150.89.227 (talk) 01:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  relevance? 
Talk:Murder in the First (film)

message: Did the person who snitched on Henry et al. have a name? What was it? Sith Lord 13 22:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snitch 

message: This Page uses unreliable references especially when it comes the history of Henri Young. The page refered to uses counterfeit evidence (fabricated pictures and documents with a very wide imagination i might say). And such abuse can lead to misinformation.....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.195.137.146 (talk) 22:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable references
Talk:City limits

message: I think GCarty was nuts to move this article here.  Generally, parenthetical annotations are necessary only for disambiguation, where there are several possible meanings for a term (see WP:MOS).  In this case, city limits is clearly a term used only in American municipal law.  No one has contested that fact.  Therefore, it has only one possible meaning, which is already noted in the first line of the article.  There is no need to disambiguate from, say, city limits in Canadian or British law.  If no one can provide a coherent defense of GCarty's action in a week I'm moving this back.  --Coolcaesar 01:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't stand this idiocy any more.  I'm moving it back now. --Coolcaesar 05:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article does not need a parenthetical in the title!

message: "British cities are defined as any town - regardless of size - that has a cathedral because the Queen has granted a letters patent" 
Actually it's a bit more complicated than that - see City status in the United Kingdom. Could somebody please upadte the article accordingly?
HairyDan 00:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly, I think this section should go.  "City limits" is an American term, and this article needs to reflect that.  I don't see the point of an article that deals with the general concept of "city boundaries" as it is expressed in different countries.  As it stands the section actually confuses a rather simple issue, which is that British cities are represented by local councils but that these councils are a lot less powerful than American ones (not having their own police etc).  Despite what is implied by this section, local councils in Britain, as elsewhere, necessarily have boundaries, and it is not "difficult" to determine them.  The difficulty comes by falsely applying American terminology and norms to a British situation.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

text: I concur.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK
Talk:Hard Rain (film)

message: At the time it was filmed, the movie had the largest painted scenic backdrop ever used in a film. According to an interview with Sir Michael Parkinson, Minnie Driver complained to the press that some members of the crew were urinating in the water tanks.
What do those two sentences have to do with each other?  Why are they in the same paragraph?  Why is the second sentence phrased like it's a continuation of the first?  If Minnie Driver complained to "the press" why is this referencing what the director claimed she said?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.106.179.2 (talk) 11:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentences are uncited, so I removed them per WP:BURDEN. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentences in production section
Talk:Windtalkers

message: Isn't there a type of monster in World of Warcraft called Windtalker? abelson 13:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Monster

message: The criticism section of this article seems a little harsh.  My impression is that the reviews were generally mixed rather than negative. The consistent criticism was about the focus of the movie on Cage's character's angst rather than the codebreakers the movie derives its title from.
I agree with him. --Mack540 20:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of the movie 

message: It seems very clear to me that the 'angst' the character suffers from is PTSD, Post traumatic stress disorder. Is this something the writers of the film have officially declared? If so, it would probably be good to add it to the article. Lejman 23:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Ender's "Angst" 

message: What is the origin of the word "windtalker"?
Was it coined for the film?
:[] This one says the term was used in WW2. 
:[] excellent info, but no explanation of the term.
:Also [].
:(But obviously, based on Code Talker).
. MBG02 (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Churchill: The Hollywood Years

message: Some plot details would be nice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.127.95 (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also seem to remember a viciously negative reaction to the film in papers such as The Express and The Daily Mail, talk about not getting the joke. A reception section would be good to chronicle these. 81.129.121.85 (talk) 21:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?
Talk:Rudy Galindo

message: Could someone please elaborate (with a reference) on how or if Galindo asked for Weir to be outed?  As it stands the article is ambiguous.  It states that Galindo challenged the media to out Weir.  It then specifies that Galindo said he thought Weir copied his style and that the media went on to question Weir's orientation.  The ambiguity lies in whether Galindo actually said that Weir should *be outed*.  
I found a post Salt Lake City 2002 Salon interview with Galindo that runs:
 Salon: If there's a skater you know who's gay, would you say to them, "Look, I came out, and look what it did for me"? Sort of advise them one way or the other?
Galindo: No, not at all. If that's what they choose, I'm not going to promote this on them, you know, "You should come out to your family and your friends and the whole public." I have too many problems myself. I just deal with what I have to do, and if that's the decision they make, that's fine.  That was four years ago, so he may have changed his mind, but it doesn't seem that he was particularly interested in outing people then. Ajasen 06:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Subject: Rudy Galindo:  His Medal record on the sidebar of his page needs to reflect his Senior accomplishments, including his National Championship in 1996.  I don't know how to fix this.  50.4.6.82 (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal Record
Talk:Point Grey Secondary School

message: Just a note to watch out here; there's a private school also in Vancouver called West Point Grey Secondary School; there might be some confusion between that school and this one. I'm not sure if this is a university prep school either; it might be the other one as well. Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 06:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Watch out

message: Carrie-Anne Moss is listed in the notable alumni section both here and on the Magee Secondary School article.  If she attended both schools, some clarification on the specific dates attended would be needed.  Thanks. TCB007 09:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carrie-Anne Moss

message: no school song should be in this becuase there is no school song  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.236.222 (talk) 23:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: school song

message: Some drawn images of phalluses left by Seth Rogan remain in the locker rooms. I feel like that should probably be mentioned somehow?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NuclearStudent (talk • contribs) 07:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superbad
Talk:Stewart Manor, New York

message: I've removed the entire History section placed by User:69.123.247.164 as a copy-and-paste from this page. Please rewrite the information in your own words and don't copy-and-paste from outside pages. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Patryk Dominik Sztyber

message: Hey,
Can somebody change the article title to just Patryk Sztyber? Because I can't find how to do it. Dominik is his middle name, no one ever calls him by that name. I mean, his first name is Patryk, not 'Patryk Dominik'.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunthervandeven (talk • contribs) 22:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Boys (2003 film)

message: This movie is an ADAPTATION of an English movie "HOT BUBBLE GUM" released in 1981  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Balajivkannan (talk • contribs) 04:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This movie is an ADAPTATION of an English movie "HOT BUBBLE GUM" released in 1981
Talk:Thirupathi (2006 Tamil-language film)

message: This article was recently listed for speedy deletion under criterion G5.  I've listed rationale why Speedy deletion per creation by a banned user (CSD G5) is not valid at WP:SD -- Samir   धर्म 02:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Db
Talk:Maniac Cop 2

message: I feel there should be an "In Popular Culture" section, similar to the one in the page for Maniac Cop, that acknowledges the line "Right by my side there's ZZ Top and Robert Z'Dar from Maniac Cop 1, 2 and 3. 2603:7081:1C46:4000:64A6:36D2:4CD9:F2B1 (talk) 21:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of info about "Two Trucks" by Lemon Demon
Talk:Lincoln Aviator

message: The infobox says that the Aviator is related to the Land Rover Discovery/LR3. As far as I know, no Land Rovers use the same platform as the Explorer/Mountaineer/Aviator, but I just want to make sure I'm correct. Is it okay to remove the Land Rovers from the infobox? —Reelcheeper (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Land Rover?

message: If the new 2020 Aviator shares the same platform as the new Ford Explorer, and the Explorer is now considered an SUV, why is the new Aviator considered a crossover instead?  I know some media sources such as Autoblog call it a crossover, but Lincoln themselves call it an SUV. --Vossanova o< 15:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not a CUV  While the use of unibody construction alone does not denote the 2020 Explorer/Aviator as a crossover (the Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ and Range Rover are definitely NOT CUVs...), supposedly its CD6 architecture will be utilized for both cars and SUVs in the future.  In addition, in terms of its price and seating, the Aviator is closely matching the soon-to-be-discontinued MKT, which the Aviator is NOT directly replacing (mentioned by both Lincoln and source used on in this article).  I consider the naming of it as an SUV as not inaccurate and should be used for the article.  --SteveCof00 (talk) 08:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossover?
Talk:Moral Development

message: This redirect should not lead to Kohlberg's stages of moral development, as there are many other areas of moral development that are not his.  People Sigmund Freud, James Gilligan, Erich Fromm, Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow, Martin Hoffman, Carol Gilligan and many others have their hands in the field of moral development.   JoeSmack Talk 06:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Davey Johnson

message: A annon has listed Davey Johnson as a alum of Johns Hopkins University, see , with the souce being, "The Sporting News Baseball Register 1975 reported that Dave Johnson (he was known as Dave then) attended a university in Texas as well as Johns Hopkins, receiving his Bachelors degree in mathematics". I am suspect of this information, While all the info that i have seen points to hime being a Grad of Texas A&M i have yet to see anything where he is mentioned attening Hopkins. Also considering that at the time he would have attemned Hopkins he would have been for Atlanta. Does anyone have any information to substationate this claim. --Boothy443| trácht ar 06:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: intresting well all i can say is incorperate the information ino the article. --Boothy443| trácht ar 01:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Connection to Johns Hopkins