lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Turboprop

message: Deleted The world's first turboprop engine that went into mass production was designed by a German engineer, Max Adolf Müller, in 1942.Green, W. and Swanborough, G.; "Plane Facts", Air Enthusiast Vol. 1 No. 1 (1971), Page 53.
'''
"World's first" claims are always popular. This statement only brings up questions while at the same time actually tells us nothing. Perhaps it's not verbatim from the source. Dart production engine deliveries began in mid-1952, so it has to be before that. It's probably referring to a Russian engine although I can't find Max Adolf Müller mentioned in any lists of German help in Russian turboprop developments. One source says the Kuznetsov TV-2 went into series production 1950/1 but it had to be twinned for the NK-12 before it was OK and that was sometime after 1952.Pieter1963 (talk) 19:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Aviation Week 1957-09-09 states literally . You were right to delete the poorly sourced statement not even linking to the quoted engine (which should be notable enough to have its own article!).--Marc Lacoste (talk) 19:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does the deletion not show in "view history"?Pieter1963 (talk) 21:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  It does--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I still don't see it when I select "view history" myself though. If I use your link I see it. If I then go back to article then view history it's gone. First time I've ever come across this. Just done another edit with a no-show. LOLPieter1963 (talk) 16:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: World's first production turboprop...

message: Can we say what fuel turboprop airplanes use?  I am suspecting Jet-A since airports already have it around, but it would be nice to say. Gah4 (talk) 21:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuel 

message: Can we add the TSFC (eg 0.280 kg/kWh) as a column to the ‘current engines’ table, please? 20040302 (talk) 11:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSFC 

message: That would be neat to have a clip of. 208.98.223.19 (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: All engine types have distinct sounds.  I'm not sure a sound clip would be of much encyclopedic value to this article. - ZLEA T\C 17:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently they have a distinctive sound?
Talk:Politics of Slovenia

message: The intro is very long, sometimes offtopic, and very U.S.-centric. Copy&paste from US State Dept. info? --Joy [shallot] 14:13, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: SO OUTDATED! Slovenia is a member of the EU and NATO, but this page doesn't reflect that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.173.37 (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important notice 
Talk:Chagang Province

message: The figure "1 147 946" given for population appears to have been copied from the Polish Wikipedia, which also does not cite a source.  Paran encyclopedia gives 1,211,413, and also does not cite a source.  Yahoo gives the same number and dates it to 1991.  ...Anyway, does anyone have access to an authoritative source? -- Visviva 01:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Why does Jagang redirect to here? Its not a misspelling, its a fictional character from the sword of truth series.
--Worldgate (talk) 01:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Anti-Racist Action

message: This section has a long list of names of skinheads and in another sentence claims the group is involved in violence. It's not clear to me if the names are sourced or not. This seems like a potential BLP issue. Can somebody verify if there are reliable sources for these names? BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of skinheads 

message: I'm going through the cleanup tags that were left a while ago and just wanted to note that Michael 2003, p. 32, appears to have more on the ARA's formation than is currently used in the article. FYI czar 22:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation 

message: May be of interest for this article:
* 
– Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New book
Talk:List of historic counties of Hungary

message: I see many pages for Hungarian and Slovak cities etc. have no or incomplete diacritics in their link and title. See for instance Hodmezovasarhely/Hódmezõvásárhely, Györ/Gyõr and Humenne/Humenné. I think we have no choice when it comes to the difficult, non- ISO-8859-1 letters like ž and ţ, but the í, é, ö, õ etc. are easy and ISO-8859-1, and they're usually pretty important for pronunciation. Is there a wiki strategy for this? And am I using the right letter for the double acute o, like in Gyõr? --User:Markussep
: You aren't, I'm afraid. õ is Latin small letter o with a tilde, whereas Gjőr has ő, Latin small letter o with a double acute.
: Because the English Wikipedia isn't coded in UTF-8, you can't reasonably use such characters in page titles (they can be created, but they won't be rendered properly). The common tactic is to strip off the diacritic marks from the titles, but use them in the article text. --Joy [shallot] 15:19, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Diacritics

message: What to do with counties that currently have a non-Hungarian name on their page, like Tekov/Bars and Orava/Árva? I suggest to give the page the Hungarian name, and redirect from the Slovak/Romanian/Croatian equivalents.--User:Markussep
::The problem is that (1), e.g. in Slovakia, the Slovak versions of the names are still used till today very often (and "Orawa" or "Spis", for example, is also frequently used in Poland till today) and were also very probably used before the arrival of the Hungarians, so it would be very strange if they would be under their Hungarian name,(2) the Hungarian names were only relevant for Non-Magyar territories from around 1850/1867 onwards (which is only a fraction of the 800 years of their existence!), until then the Latin names were used officially (in the 1780s and 1849-1867 also the German names) and the local population used the name versions in its own language (e.g. in Slovakia, except for southern parts, Slovak or German versions)
:::The situation depicted in the list of historical Hungarian counties existed between 1876 and 1918. Since the county pages (at least those of the Slovak counties) cover a larger period, I'm comfortable with using Slovak/Croatian names on the county pages, but I suggest to keep the Hungarian name on the list page. --User:Markussep
: I wonder about the Hungarian names as well... AFAIR, the Magyar language policy didn't quite affect the Croatian lands all the time (in fact, when the Magyars decided to use Magyar in all official communication with the Croats in 1848, all hell broke loose), so I'm thinking that the counties of Croatia at the time must have had equivalent Latin or German or Croatian names as well as Magyar ones. --Joy [shallot]
:: Of course they had, it's up to you now to go to a library and find them...:-)
Juro 17:18, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hungarian or Slovak/Romanian/Croatian names

message: *I saw Joy added nice maps for the Croatian counties. Can someone do that for the other counties?
:: That would be nice indeed.
Markussep 15:37, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps
Talk:Sinuiju Special Administrative Region

message: If Hong Kong and Macau have ISO codes, why doesn't this? Just because HKG and MAC had been colonies before? Strange. —Nightstallion (?) 11:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ISO 3166
Talk:NEXT (Korean band)

message: I'm pretty sure N.EX.T also did the Guilty Gear XX#Reload soundtrack (KDSD-00017~8), so unless someone knows otherwise I'll add it in a few days. xoa 04:32, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Discography 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to NEXT (Korean band). via consensus in compromises. As Amakuru points out, N.EX.T with or without an ending "." is the preponderant form in our sources. But as SMcCandlish points out, MOS:ACRO tells us we should not use periods in acronym titles, and this is an acronym per our sources. it seems the most persuasive arguments here involve resolving the strange periodization of the current title, and this accomplishes that well. This satisfies the most pressing points made by all participants, and complies with our policies. It is, as a result, the consensus via compromise. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: N.EX.T →  – lack of English sources but band wasn't a real acronym more a stylism, and simply referred to as "Next" in Korean pronunciation and running sources - see also current RM at :talk:NEXT (Chinese band). In ictu oculi (talk) 07:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Which you yourself closed and moved as a non-admin. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ...there was general consensus to move there anyway. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 October 2022
Talk:Abell 1835 IR1916

message: When was it discovered?
--174.2.8.221 (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: date of discovery

message: 'also simply called Abell 1835' - is that correct? Abell 1835 is actually the name of the foreground galaxy cluster which is lensing the image of Abell 1835 IR1916. At a redshift of z=10, Abell 1835 IR1916 isn't part of the same cluster and it would be misleading to call it just Abell 1835 except as a lazy shorthand amongst the particular astronomers studying it. -- Solipsist 14:57, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is also true, that it is also simply called Abell 1835, because of sloppy media shorthand, and slothful astronomer shorthand. 132.205.15.4 19:13, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: There's talk about 'debunking' here, but what exactly remains after the debunking is unclear. Is this a real galaxy, but not as far away as thought, is it some other kind of object, or is it nothing at all really, just some accidental speck on a photographic plate? - Andre Engels 15:25, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What is it (not)?

message: I added the link to the Kardashev scale for the IndianDaily article, with that in mind ("Fictional civilizations") I think the article is clearly false, perhaps it should not appear on the page at all. Belgianatheist (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems someone removed the text you added without any comment whatsoever. While it certainly wasn't written in an encyclopedic way, I don't think it should have been removed entirely. 213.89.222.42 (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't add the whole text, just the Kardashev scale, it is probably best that the whole section is removed as it clearly has nothing to do with science. Belgianatheist (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kardashev scale
Talk:Calculating local time

message: I'd like to see some examples of calculating local time difference between 2 locations, when the daylight saving rules are different. Say one city is Europe and the other city is in America, and the date is between the last Sunday in March and the first Sunday in April. Europe will be on daylight time, while America won't. What then?--Uncle Ed 00:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: When daylight saving rules are different
Category talk:Length

message: Length is a physical quantity which can be measured, rather than an entire branch of physics. Category: Physics is currently being used to describe branches / sub-branches of physics; and Category:Physical quantity is being used to describe measurable quantities in Physics. I'd suggest that Category: Length is therefore a sub-category of the wrong category Ian Cairns 15:50, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment
Talk:Amy Poehler

message: Ref 146 The "2011 TIME 100" does not use a proper cite template and has no author/date parameters, I will let someone more familiar with the article sort it. Regards  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 02:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref 146 The 2011 TIME 100 

message: The article does not mention the documentary film Lucy and Desi that Poehler directed. The film was released by Amazon in March 2022. The film is already on her filmography page. I think the section to add it here is the "Director" section, but I'll leave the to others to decide. 134.41.100.67 (talk) 22:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I kinda thought there might be some Poehler super-fans out there who would have come along quickly and added the film to the article, but I guess I was wrong. So I just took a shot at adding it myself. The RT citation is a bare link and the release date information, while uncontroversial, probably could use a properly formatted citation. I leave those fixes for someone who is a lot better at the technical stuff than I am. Other edits to improve what I added are very welcome. I just wanted to get some mention of the film on the page, as it should be included (and the film itself does not have it's own Wikipedia page). 134.41.100.67 (talk) 19:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucy and Desi
Talk:Top (BDSM)

message: This article has been merged. See Top and bottom in sex and BDSM (talk) Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 05:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right that the term is not solely used in BDSM, but I don't think that there is much to write about these terms outside of the BDSM context. The biggest part of this article would be the BDSM part, so I think it should stay here. You could split this article into Top (sex) and Top (BDSM), maybe. --Conti|✉ 17:36, Aug 23, 2004 (UTC)
I agree.
Dlloyd 17:46, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: This merger was  to highly contra productive. The Spanish, Italian, Dutch and German articles clearly show  that at least Switch, Top (BDSM) and Bottom (BDSM) are relevant single lemmata. Literature given there proofs this as well. Additionaly the merger was not tagged as described in Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages.
The argument about this being an "good compare-and-contrast article" is doesn't make any sense. I would like to see what would happen if merged capitalism&communism into an "compare-and-contrast article" deleting the original ones only because nobody answered to my merger ideas. Its really strange that there was allegedly no response to the pre-merger suggestions, nevertheless even the smallest amount of thoughtfulness should have prevented this. The intention to merge homosexual and BDSM topics in order to "compare-and-contrast" them while deleting the source article is at least original research if not POV. --Nemissimo 12:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See discussion in Talk:Top and bottom in sex and BDSM. Sai Emrys ¿? ✍ 09:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversing the merger 

message: Changed "he" to "he or she" etc. throughout. I'm quite frankly rather shocked that a page on alternative sexuality would have been written in such a sexist manner.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.235.131 (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender-neutral language 

message: I feel very uncomfortable with the Professional dominant page redirecting here.  A BDSM top and a sex worker are entirely different things.  I think having 'rent boy' redirect to 'homosexual' would be an appropriate analogue to this.  Is there another more appropriate page which Professional dominant could redirect to?
--Lubyanka 0:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional_dominant redirecting here
Talk:Color confinement

message: What does 'confining phase' mean in following excerpt?  not understandable to even lay physicist.  Wilson loop is ok since there is a link.
"The confining phase is usually defined by the behavior of the action of the Wilson loop"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.140.104 (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confining 'phase' 

message: The article explains why color confinement prevents quarks from being separated, but not why mesons can only be made of a quark and an antiquark.ZFT (talk) 22:56, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you mean "why aren't there any light-weight three-quark particles, lighter than the proton?" Good question. Another good question might be "so why isn't the mass of a quark-anti-quark meson equal to about 2/3rds of a proton?" and that's another good question. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 21:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information left out regarding application to mesons 

message: I think the rubber band comparison is a little misleading. The force in a rubber band is proportional to its extension, whereas the force between two quarks is independent of the distance between them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.145.180 (talk) 17:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubber band comparison 

message: Color confinement “Because of this behavior of the gluon field, a strong force between the quark pair acts constantly—regardless of their distance—with a strength of around 160,000 newtons, roughly the weight of three elephants.”
Strong interaction: "After a limiting distance (about the size of a hadron) has been reached, it remains at a strength of about 10,000 newtons, no matter how much farther the distance between the quarks."Antonquery (talk) 03:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  160,000 or 10,000 Newtons?
Talk:Hawaii/Archive 3

message: While statehood documents do use the spelling Hawaii, various acts of the Hawai'i State Legislature and the 1978 Hawai'i State Constitutional Convention adopted the diacritical marks for official usage.  Most recently, both major newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser and now even the Honolulu Star-Bulletin have made it official policy or just begun to use the diacritical marks.  The same constitutional convention also adopted the Hawaiian language and the alphabet, including all diacritical marks, as the official language of the state.  --Gerald Farinas 01:13, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of Diacritical Marks are Codified in Law
Talk:Dan (king)

message: Jallan, what about a resumé in the beginning? Well done, anyway.--Wiglaf 17:22, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: What about the theory the Danes were a Nordic tribe who intermingled extensively with bands of emigrants from Greece? 142.181.247.43 (talk) 21:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greeks
Talk:Old Norse poetry

message: The Eggjum Stone is certainly important for all sorts of reasons, historical and linguistic, but does it really belong on a list of "Important examples of Norse poetry" next to Hávamál and Völuspá? Io 17:29, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an article (and a very good one, IMO) under development, Alliterative verse, which overlaps Old Norse poetry to a considerable degree. Any thoughts about how we might avoid reduplication of effort? Cheers Io 16:13, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny how this remains the case 18 years later. Mårtensås (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Alliterative verse]]

message: I removed the reference to the Eggjum Stone after careful consideration. I really do not believe it counts as an example of important Norse poetry. It is important as an example of runic writing and as evidence of language development, but not as poetry. If it is an emotional matter for anyone, just undo my change. I won't make an issue out of it — at least not without discussion. Cheers Io 16:20, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: you have a point.  My idea was to point to the possibly earliest known sample: If the stanza is correctly identified, it would be a very important example of Old Norse poetry, since it would be the oldest record by far (the Edda was written down some 400 years later). But seeing that it is really fragmentary, and maybe not poetry at all, I won't insist to include it here. dab 07:29, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: True. But there are poems of a similar age recorded, although the actual writing down took place much later (some of the Edda poems, the poetry of Bragi Boddason and of some of ghe the court poets of Haraldur hárfagri - although the latter of these are a century younger). My main objection to the Eggjum Stone is, that it hardly qualifies as poetry. If we include that we might as well include the inscription of the Golden Horns. Cheers Io 16:36, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: The [[Eggjum_stone|Eggjum Stone]]

message: Both Eddic an Eddaic are synonymously proper English language words; however, the two sources used (so far) prefer "Eddic" rather than "Eddaic". I am thinking of making Eddic the main term, and mentioning Eddaic as an alternative. Dcattell (talk) 01:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddic vs. Eddaic 

message: I've been working on the Alliterative Verse entry, and felt that for that article to work, a lot of the details on Old Norse poetry more logically belonged here. So I've moved them here and merged them in, which I think gives a much more satisfying and complete discussion of Old Norse verse forms. However, a lot of the material is not well cited. More work needs to be done to get this article up to spec. PDDeane (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content moved here from Alliterative verse
Talk:Treecko/Pokémon Debate

message: From VfD:
Wikipedia doesn't need an article on every single Pokemon character. See also: Sceptile, Torchic, Combusken, Blaziken and Mudkip, among MANY others. Is it possible to put all those listed on List of Pokémon up for a mass deletion? Wikipedia is not a fansite. And while Wikipedia may not be paper, server resources are also finite. --Elf-friend 17:52, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Pest (disambiguation)

message: Dear Wikipedians,
I have rewritten the Hungarian part of this disambiguation page and advise you that I cancelled the Slovakian version of the city's name because disambiguation page is only for redirecting people to the place of their interest. I think it would be better to show it in the Budapest article. If you think, feel free to add this information to the Budapest page.
--Millisits 18:11, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Surely Pest (organism) is the most common use of the term and should be here with a link to other uses? Sabine's Sunbird  talk 07:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dab?
Talk:Park Sung-hyun (archer)

message: The ranks of her opponents are all given (and how were they determined?), but what rank was she?~ender 2007-05-12 05:43:AM MST —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.167.217.162 (talk) 12:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What rank was she? 

message: No reason to mention the Chinese crowd. Sure, it wasn't completely fair, but it's to be expected for the host country. The crowd was much worse for the team match (also Korea vs. China), and Korea won that one decisively. Anything can happen in a 12-arrow round when the competitors are world class. Also, Park shot an 8 four times in the last round. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.20.101 (talk) 01:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Crowd