Talk:Mercury-Atlas 6

message: I have proposed that all Mercury missions are re-named. This will affect this page. So they can be discussed together on one page, I've set up a subpage of my user talk page for discussion of the moves. --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 20:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move (2006)

message: The "fireflies" were urine droplets vented out of the spacecraft. If I can find a citation for this I will include it in the article, but if anyone else has it, feel free to go ahead. None of this is in my areas of interest.--Buckboard 23:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fireflies

message: Mention should be made of the intense media & popular interest this mission received as it was the U.S. (and "free world"'s) first successful manned orbiting mission.... and also of the controversy regarding mission control's unwillingness to disclose all their concerns to Glenn about the possible landing bag deployment at the time.  This is covered in his memoir also.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.146.176.24 (talk) 12:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be added 

message: "Number in parentheses indicates number of spaceflights by each individual prior to and including this mission."
I know that someone has been applying this template to spaceflight mission articles, but in this case it seems a bit bureaucratic to add this, as, being the US's first manned spaceflight, the number is and can be only 1.
- Aprogressivist (talk) 11:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number in parentheses indicates number of spaceflights by each individual prior to and including this mission. 

message: The bulk of this article appears to be plagiarized from source material, judging from its style and tone (and consistency of editing).  Could someone please check the current article against the sources it lists?  Perhaps good paraphrasing (and citing) would address the problem, if the information was indeed lifted verbatim from the listed sources, or from others unlisted.  Memetics (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Be aware that works of NASA are generally in the public domain. See . There are however many good reasons for adding plentiful source citations, and this article would certainly benefit from them. (sdsds - talk) 20:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible plagiarism problems need to be addressed 

message: Hey, I'm not a wikipedia guy so I don't know how to add this, but if someone could...John Glenn was the first US Astronaut to eat in space (from a tube, per the NASM):
https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/apollo-to-the-moon/online/astronaut-life/food-in-space.cfm
"First Meal in Space
John Glenn was the first American to eat in space aboard Friendship 7 in 1962. At that time it was not known if ingestion and absorption of nutrients were possible in a state of zero gravity. Glenn's consumption of applesauce, packed in a tube, and xylose sugar tablets with water, demonstrated that people could eat, swallow, and digest food in a weightless environment.
Mercury space food of the early 1960s was based on Army survival rations, and consisted of pureed food packed into aluminum tubes and sucked through a straw. While Glenn and the other Mercury astronauts experienced no problems in chewing, drinking, swallowing, or digesting, the food was not considered very delicious.
Beef and Vegetables
This spacefood package containing pureed beef and vegetables was issued to John Glenn for consumption during his Friendship 7 flight in February 1962. Spacefood for the Mercury missions was placed in tube form to enable the astronauts to squeeze it directly into their mouths."
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.25.125 (talk) 01:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First US Astronaut to eat in space 

message: An editor recently added Hidden Figures to the film dramatization section. I just saw this film; it's very good, but contains a few technical inaccuracies for the sake of drama, one of which is inaccurately saying (in words on-screen at the end) that Glenn's flight was intended to last for seven orbits but was cut short to three because of the erroneous heat-shield indication. As this page notes, that is incorrect; although Glenn was "go for at least seven orbits" (meaning that was at least how long his orbit would last in the absence of retro fire), the program was conducted cautiously and it was only ever intended for him to make the three orbits. 
This is verifiable by the Kenneth Gatland book Manned Spaceflight. (It also stands to common sense: Carpenter's following flight also made only three orbits, and Schirra's flight progressed to only six. If seven had been Glenn's goal, surely they would have been tried again on Carpenter's flight, and Schirra would have tried even more than six.) I think the erroneous reference to seven orbits should be noted here; this enhances the reader's encyclopedic understanding of the dramatic representation, and makes the reference to the movie more than just another trivia reference. (It should also be added to the Hidden Figures page, along with a few other minor technical and historical inaccuracies.) Would anyone have heartburn with me adding the number-of-orbits issue here? JustinTime55 (talk) 17:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical accuracy of film dramatization 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mercury-Atlas 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090525123504/https://mira.hq.nasa.gov/history/ws/hdmshrc/all/main/DDD/16286.PDF to https://mira.hq.nasa.gov/history/ws/hdmshrc/all/main/DDD/16286.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the "Spacecraft location" section, there's no explanation why the "fragment" found in South Africa becomes the plural "fragments" or why, in the second-to-last sentence of the section, both singular and plural forms are used.
This either needs to be explained, clarified, and/or corrected. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 06:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hard to do that when it isn't even cited per (WP:VERIFY) I'm moving it here until a citation can be found:
 JustinTime55 (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many fragments? 

message: The apogee mentioned in the "Parameters" section contradicts the apogee in the infobox. In the infobox it says 248 km while in "Parameters" it says 248 nautical miles, that's almost twice as high. Also, in the "Reentry" section it's written that the drogue chute deployed at 28,000 ft while in the list "Flight" 22,000 ft are written. Glasfaser Wien (talk) 12:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory info 

message: This is really a "C" article. Lots of good info, but huge swathes are uncited. Someday we'll do the Mercury flights right. :) I am going through adding "Naming" sections. --Neopeius (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downgrade