Talk:Les Murray (poet)

message: Jasonedwardclapham - on my talk page you left the following message:
I will not reverse your edit, but just add this comment saying why I don't agree with this censorship. On Les Murray's Homepage there will aways be the Les Murray version of his history in which the author can edit, emphasise and present information in a way that suits his purposes.  The article deleted I found interesting as it added additional contextual information and it gave me an alternate viewpoint.  I recognise that the removed article has it's own slant, gave edited facts and placed emphasis on certain areas of Les Murray's history ignoring others - you call this political emphasis, I disagree.  My understanding of the world comes from - my acutal knowledge of the world (i.e. my own tiny window where I interact with it), information I read and have read over a long time and what I remember of that, and my ethical and moral framework.  You should trust people more - I do not read Les Murray's view and discount all other, nor do I read the other article and ignore Les Murray's account.  Having more information is not a bad thing.  Stellar 23:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of articles 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: I heard LM on the radio years ago. He spoke briefly of a story he had be commissioned to write around erotic feminisation. It was to be or had beenpublished as a private edition. Should this, if the details are found and it's private edition nature confirmed, be added to the Works section? 49.181.18.221 (talk) 07:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's Les Murray from SBS.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works: private edition: feminisation erotic fiction 

message: Murray's politics is a bit obscured.--Jack Upland (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics 

message: He "lived briefly at a Sydney Push household at Milsons Point". So what?--Jack Upland (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Push household 

message: I've edited the article to show that Murray was on the 1997 list of National Living Treasures organised by the National Trust, NSW branch. However I concede that the citation to https://www.mamamia.com.au/national-living-treasures/ shows only that Murray was on the list in 2004. I could not find the 1997 list. Because it was by a popular vote, I have some doubts Murray was on the 1997 list; let's face it, poetry is not particularly popular in Australia compared with sport, politics, and other forms of entertainment. If Murray were not on the 1997 list, he must have been added by the Trust in 2004. In the meantime, I have given 1997 as the year to replace the mysterious, awkward, original words "1997, 2004 or 2012". (2012 is out in any case.) Please help establish the year of Murray's membership of the list.Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 05:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Murray on the 1997 list of National Living Treasures? 

message: The website in the author blog, lesmurray.org, doesn't seem to be this Les Murray? Sterry2607 (talk) 10:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The blog's owner calls himself Lester Murray and is much younger than the late great poet. Bjenks (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website in article 

message: The link to the first source, https://www.johntranter.com/reviewer/1977-murray.shtml, goes to a 404 page. Maybe the link is deprecated? Oasis-j (talk) 00:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Source