lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rouben Mamoulian

message: :Did he have a brother named Zachary -- or a pseudonym?
Hrhadam (talk) 21:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * does all of this info come from just the one source listed? (Funk and Wagnalls).  --Mdukas (talk) 07:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  comments, questions, suggestions 

message: I don't know why you write that he was Armenian-American director. First of all he was born and raised in Georgia and his parents were also born and raised in Georgia. I don't deny that he had Armenian origins, but you know many Georgians have armenian origins, as there has always been an armenian emigration in Georgia. Mamoulian didn't even speak Armenian. I think the most correct way would be to write that he was an American director and than in bio mention that he was born and raised in Georgia in the family of armenian origin or something like that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varsika (talk • contribs) 20:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armenian lobby is working hard I see.
Talk:Massachusetts Route 79

message: Someone knowing more about the original path of Route 79 may want to add a section.  I know before Route 24 was built, Route 79 travelled south on South Main Street in Assonet all the way to the city line with Fall River, and presumably it continued south on North Main Street in Fall River.  Where it went from there, I don't know.  Sahasrahla (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure.  Interestingly, I took a look at a map of the state from 1946 (http://cartweb.geography.ua.edu:9001/StyleServer/calcrgn?cat=North%20America%20and%20United%20States&item=States/Massachusetts/Massachusetts1946a.sid&wid=500&hei=400&props=item%28Name,Description%29,cat%28Name,Description%29&style=simple/view-dhtml.xsl), and it doesn't show 79.  In fact, the route 79 now travels between County Street and Route 18 isn't even shown as paved.  Will keep looking. ToddC4176 (talk) 22:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original route 

message: I've removed the picture of the "end" of Route 79.  According to maps, signage and mileage, Route 79 South does not continue past the I-195 and 138 split.  The picture shows the split along the I-195 ramp between the ramps to eastbound and westbound.ToddC4176 (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of picture
Talk:Massachusetts Route 2

message: Do New Englanders actually use the word "freeway" now?  The only time I ever heard it used there was when "C.H.I.P.S." was on television.  Calling portions of Route 2 a "freeway" instead of an "expressway" or "limited-access highway" makes this article sound like it's about something in California.  Or has that changed in the past few years?  Wlindley (talk) 11:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the 40 years I've lived in Central Mass. I've never heard the word freeway used... Rt. 2 has always been referred to as either a "Highway", or just by name. Looneybunny (talk) 04:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Freeway" really?
Talk:Massachusetts Route 30

message: Many maps show Route 30 joining Route 20 and ending at Kenmore Square.  Are we certain Packard's Corner is the official end and not Kenmore Square? --CPAScott (talk) 20:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Packard's Corner or Kenmore Square?
Talk:Massachusetts Route 88

message: Route 88 is peculiar in that long stretches of it do not meet the criteria under Massachusetts statutes for a limited-access or express state highway -- these must be divided highways -- yet signs have been posted unlawfully prohibiting bicycling, which would be convenient and safe with its wide shoulders.
There are other arterial highways in Massachusetts that have the same "illegal" signs: U.S. Route 44 between Route 18/28 (the Middleborough Circle) and Route 105 in Middleborough immediately comes to mind. Which statute is it that is being cited?
It's interesting to note that the Plimoth Plantation Highway, a two-lane freeway in Plymouth, from the eastern terminus at Route 3A to where the highway divides prior to merging with Route 3 west of Sandwich Road, does not prohibit bicycles from that portion. With that said, it's a very bad idea to bike along any stretch of that highway. Ed (talk) 05:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlawful signs? 

message: I am changing the length of the highway and the southern terminus to reflect what the signage actually says.  As of 2009, the "State Highway Begins/Ends" signs, as well as the "Mile 0" markers, are all at the northern end of the Horseneck Beach State Reservation lands.  While most official sources put it south of this point, by all mile markers this is the actual end of 88.  ToddC4176 (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern terminus 
Talk:Massachusetts Route 4

message: Google maps has Rt 4 continuing concurrent with Rt 3A up to the Tyngsboro Bridge.  I have never seen this signed so I'm sure it's an error on their part, but it is quite interesting... CSZero (talk) 22:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyngsborough? 
Talk:Massachusetts Route 28

message: I believe at least part of this road is also known as Monseigneur O'Brien Highway, but I'm not clear on exactly which part that is.  If someone knows of a good source to cite, adding this information to this article would be worthwhile.  JNW2 (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Monseigneur O'Brien Highway
Talk:Massachusetts Route 28A

message: The Route 28A article in its pre-merge version is very stubby and works better as a pre-expressway alignment of a short section of Route 28. The only independent information is the route description, which is already in the Route 28 article. The history is intertwined with the main Route 28 history. User:Ktr101 is opposed to the merge so I'm opening a discussion to see what the broader U.S. Roads community thinks about the appropriateness of merging. --Polaron | Talk 05:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the Route 28A information appropriately belongs as a section of the Route 28 article, since it acts as an auxiliary route. ---Dough4872 15:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I would format it more like the NY 30A section on New York State Route 30, though. – TMF 23:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. Not notable - WP:USRD/NT. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Why couldn't that go in the 28 article? --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It could. I just looked at other state Route XA articles and this one is in the top 5 or 6 for length. It is the longest one under 10 miles though. I just thought that might warrant some notability of its own in a way. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just wondering why this article is proposed to be merged when a few others, which aren't as long are being allowed to stay. I'm not accusing anyone of trying to tick me off or anything, but it just seems odd. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They should probably be merged too. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

text: The history of the 28A roadbed is a history of 28 since that was its prior designation. And I agree that most of the other "-A" routes should be merged as well. --Polaron | Talk 05:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Route 28
Talk:Massachusetts Route 15

message: I traveled on this highway on 27 May 2007. All of the MA Route 15 signs on Brook Street in Seekonk, in both directions, have been removed. Also, all signed references to Route 15 (MA or RI) from MA Route 152 have been removed. Westbound, the first reassurance shield is after the state line, as RI Route 15. Eastbound on Armistice Blvd. (RI Route 15) in Pawtucket RI, there is no "END RI 15" reassurance shield at the state line. On the MA side of the border, on Brook Street, there are a series of signs that, first, say "TO (MA) 152" with a staight-ahead arrow underneath. A short distance later are the two directional signs to MA 152: left turn for 152 North, right turn for 152 South. It appears that MA Route 15 has been decommissioned. Ed 22:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The highway is still maintained by the state and listed in the latest GIS data from Executive Office of Transportation - Office of Transportation Planning Roads - June 2008. Sswonk (talk) 04:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since that is the case, might this be a highway that is either unsigned or secret, officially or unofficially? Ed (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Massachusetts Route 151

message: I rewrote the article. While it's not perfect, if it passes muster would an editor please remove the template at the top of the article. Thank you. Ed (talk) 04:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed Article 
Talk:Massachusetts Route 3A

message: Based on this article, the "north" and "south" Route 3As are just two segments of the same route. If that's the case, those two articles should be merged into this one. If that's not the case, this article needs to be wiped out and turned into a dab page. – TMF 16:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with merging. Other similar cases where the "A" route has unsigned overlaps with the parent route (Route 2A and Route 1A) don't have split articles. MassGIS data also show that mileposts increase continuously for the various disconnected sections of these routes. --Polaron | Talk 17:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: T think a merge would work. But keep in mind the southern MA 3A is related to MA 3 while the northern MA 3A is related to US 3. However, MassDOT treats US 3 and MA 3 as the same route. Dough4872 22:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I agree with merging as well. Imzadi 1979 →  19:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed to the merge as well.  Currently, there's little information on the main article; the offshoots could stand to be merged here.  The resulting article would not be that large, or at least not large enough to warrant a split.  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 15:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Considering all those who were in favor of a merge, and the lack of any significant work done since the proposal, I have gone ahead and performed the merge.  I also separated the infobox into north and south sections as an extra bold move.  The other two articles have been redirected.  —Onore Baka Sama(speak | stalk) 00:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Link to "Route 3B" points to "Route 38"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:192:4701:B63A:7D8A:4D75:67B8:3AC3 (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Link Address
Talk:Massachusetts Route 213

message: You know, I have lived off rt213 my entire life and no one has EVER called it the Loop that I know of. "The Loop" is the name of the relatively new mall that stands where the old Methuen Mall was. And the Loop connector signs were purely a marketing campaign.  But what do I know. EraserGirl (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: the loop
Talk:Massachusetts Route 31

message: Removed some unrelated information pertaining to Chief Mortell. This article is about a road, not a crime. A mention of Chief Mortell is warranted as it is related to the naming of the road, but a description of his death and an unrelated memorial are not pertinent to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.26.124.105 (talk) 01:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Massachusetts Route 27

message: In regards to the History section of this article: It is noted that more work/research needs to be done regarding the history of MA27 and its routing, especially south of Wayland. I am close to certain a bypass was built in Medfield from Route 109 to Hospital Road (and the Sherborn town line) about 1965, though I have not been able to locate any detailed information that could be used as a decent reference. The old MA 27 alignment though Medfield would have been routed on North Street, then Harding, then Hospital Road as far as I can ascertain. In all it is a significant bypass at being about 3 or 4 miles in length, so I think it ought to be included in this article if someone can access good-quality sources). Austin023 (talk) 23:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

message: In its passage through Acton, there is a single sign on the northbound side that reads Middlesex County Rte 27. I never noticed it before tonight, but there is a look of some slight antiquity about it, so I suspect it isn't new. Does anyone know if the road was ever so designated? I'm not aware that Massachusetts ever had numbered county routes such as one sees in many other states. I debated whether the sign's intent was to mark a county line, but then realized that one was well into Middlesex County at the point where I observed it. Irish Melkite (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  County Route 27 ?
Talk:Massachusetts Route 127

message: Why does Mass. Route 127 have its signs posted as a North-South highway when it really is an East-West highway?  To be more precise, it's an ENE-WSW highway, which is closest to East-West.  I know that the parallel Route 128 is labeled as "North-South" in the same towns, but MA-127 only goes from Beverly to Rockport.  This particular route is the one exception that I've seen in the rules of route numbering.  I've had people get lost before because someone gave directions as "go east down Route 127" when, to be consistent with the signage, they should have said "go north down Route 127."  The Commonwealth in its infinite wisdom. --24.147.169.135 05:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  North-South? 

message: Is this roadway considered a partial beltway? Cause it looks like one to me. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 21:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beltway?
Talk:Massachusetts Route 97

message: As with other multi-state routes where only a tiny portion of the route is in one state (Route 286 (Massachusetts–New Hampshire), New Hampshire Route 26, and numerous others, there's no inherent benefit from keeping the short New Hampshire section in its own article.  All of the text can be kept in one article without overwhelming the two of them.  If there is not a reason specifically why this shouldn't be done, I will undertake the merge.  Speak soon or forever hold your peace. --Jayron32 17:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Marriage plot

message: "We may see this, for instance, in the film You've Got Mail, which resolves the political opposition between mega-bookstore boss Tom Hanks and bookshop-around-the-corner owner, when Meg Ryan, by uniting its lead characters in a saccharine union that effaces the unequal distribution of capital that originally put them at odds."
This sentence is unparseable. Can someone fix it up so it makes sense? Wiwaxia 07:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fujiko Mine

message: Fujiko appeared in the seventh position on the female polls, and fifth place overall.
That can't be correct, can it? If she was 7th in the female poll, how can she be 5th overall? Even if all of the women were put above the men in the overall ranking, she should still be 7th, no?
:I think it means she was the 7th most popular character among female voters, not that she was the 7th most popular female character. I'll edit for clarity. Esk (talk) 01:19, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: in the piece in which she is supposed to be bisexual, I only wanted to add the fact that in that circumstance one could be simply due to the fact that she behaves like this and seduces women only because she wants to achieve a specific goal, obtain something that she wishes, moreover her orientation has not yet been at least well delineated.
having said that I wanted to make this small addition saying this : or it could be that this is simply another means of getting what she wants, as her current orientation has not been clarified .
as there are no certain main sources that co-exist its orientation.
in addition, as is reported on the aforementioned page, it is said that she is willing to do everything in any case to obtain everything she wants.
I hope it will be appreciated, not in my intent to annoy or vandalize the aforementioned page. Leonardo3245 (talk) 11:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  edif
Talk:Master Takahashi's Adventure Island IV

message: Why is it blurry? There's a better-quality version of it somewhere... 208.101.155.204 21:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this? https://i.imgur.com/rQ55r9Y.jpg source https://www.famicomworld.com/forum/index.php?topic=12129.0 83.23.95.222 (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  That boxart… 
Talk:List of Lupin the 3rd Part I episodes

message: This move request is part of a merge process that I already began, using this page as a basis instead of the other because it has more content (and hence more history entries) than the main article Lupin III (anime). The merger was already proposed by another user though he wanted to merge all the main pages about the anime, leaving the episodes list aside. I think this is unfeasible because the infoboxes would clutter the page, leaving little actual content.
The same goes for Lupin III Part III and List of Lupin III Part III episodes and Shin Lupin III and List of Lupin III Part II episodes. Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk)
:Since this is not properly a move request, but really a merge request, and the merge has already been completed, I have removed this request from WP:Requested moves.  If you feel there has been an error, please contact me on my talk page. Cheers,--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 08:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:The Next One (ice hockey)

message: Found this page after reading Jason Spezza held this nickname for a bit in the OHL.
Add a new member to the list, Conner McDavid. 
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/story/2013/04/24/sp-connor-mcdavid-under-18-championship.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.85.218 (talk) 17:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good article. I've added it without the name as it hasn't made significant press yet (may happen during his draft year). Secondarily though, I've added a quote from the article to McDavid's own page, so the content you wanted is indeed now on Wikipedia. Jeremy112233 (talk) 21:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conner McDavid
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zarbon

message: : , please specify a code letter from the list at the top, and then add the explanation of your request for checkuser and examples of policy violations, as laid out by the template. Daniel.Bryant 05:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, where is this "code"? Daniel, you there? Can somebody help me here? Power level (Dragon Ball) 05:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Requests for checkuser header. Daniel.Bryant 05:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Where the hell is that number? All you've shown me is a procedures page. Power level (Dragon Ball) 06:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Powder Mountain

message: I am removing unsourced material inserted by 
User 209.80.133.101
because it appears to be in personal essay form, creating problems of style as well as original research.   
The personal experiences and opinions expressed in this segment are probably not usable for the article, but there are many fact claims which, if verifiable, would be valuable contributions.
I am posting the excised material below, so that other editors can go through it and re-insert usable material in encyclopedic form. Baileypalblue 07:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of material inserted by User 209.80.133.101 

message: There is no Powder Mountain (British Columbia) yet but there is the Powder Mountain Icefield, which is the icefield that it's on/in; there was also a Powder Mountain resort proposal that was shot down in the 1980s and will warrant :Category:Canadian political scandals (or is that :Category:Political scandals in Canada?) once it's made.  Long story, but its proposed base village area is pretty well the same site that's being used for the Nordic facilities and athletes' village for the 2010 Winter Olympics (though not on Powder Mountain itself)Skookum1 08:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: dab line needed eventually
Talk:Malayan Communist Party

message: It should be CPM. Communist Party of Malaya
:I agree. Apparently it was officially called as the CPM, but often known as the MCP.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it would be interesting to see the evidence of this because MCP seems to be used by the enemies of the party, not the party itself.  The normal nomeclature for Communist Parties was to have the country last, e.g., CPSU, CPUSA, CPA. I think the general idea was to express internationalism: the parties operated in specific countries but did not represent them, and welcomed people of other nationalities, e.g. Lai Teck, Bela Kun, Ho Chi Minh in France.  Incidentally, the ASIO files for the Communist Party of Australia (CPA) routinely call it the ACP.  There seems to be a pattern here, but I don't have a reasonable explanation.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And why is it "fine" to use a name that wasn't used by the party for most of its life, but "not appropriate" to use a name that was?--Jack Upland (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The obvious way to shorten the article is to move most of the material on the Emergency into the Emergency article, leaving the section here as only a summary.  The more political MCP-focussed belongs here.  This would be a major exercise.
I have tried to move some information on Lai Te(ck) to his article.  However, much of it is important here.
On the other hand, the article needs a summary of developments post-1960, so I have created a section to deal with this -- mainly by pulling together existing info.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem, however, is that much of the material here is not duplicated elsewhere.  The Emergency article largely deals with it from a military and British point of view.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:18, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructure 

message: The answer is wrong. Although Chin Peng claims it during to his retirement and his obituary stating that MCP contributes Malayan independence, it's arguably that this fact is correct or it just merely some baseless claims. MCP isn't literally just claiming independence, it's also trying to make sure that Marxism-Leninisme ideaology stood in Malayan during gruesome Malayan Emergency era as per described in their manifesto. With that, many people would questioning their ulterior motives in their cause. Is it merely to claim independence or it's just a political move to sweep away right wing cause that trying to claim it peacefully ? Cbrn96soul (talk) 17:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does MCP contributes in Malayan independence effort ?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spain/Spain-related categories

message: Please consider to prune the list :Category:Bullfighting is not just Spanish. That would be like tagging all foolballclubs as English because football originates there. Also a lot of Mexican stuff is somewhere in the category tree that has no relation to Spain anymore. (bar the time it was part of Spain ie independance war). Agathoclea 08:10, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullfighting

message: Is it possible for the list to be run again as it seems seriously out of date. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update