Talk:Agni (missile)

message: The Agni II section reads like someone's personal essay. 195.197.240.134 (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agni II 

message: I feel the blatant deletion of sub-section (Preface: Evolving Indian Security Environment) without discussion on this page is unwarranted and against WP:MOS
will be eager to hear comments from Noorkhanuk85.
cheers! 
OlkhichaAppa (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Then percived threat by pakistan as Impetus for developement 

message: I think this tag is unwarranted since the article is essentially about Indian missile programme. So I fail to understand how can it represent the worldwide view?
OlkhichaAppa (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A lot of the content has been blatantly ripped off Bharat-Rakshak.com, a clearly non neutral source. I doubt the Indian government would claim to have invented reentry vehicles. Also the Indian government has never disclosed the exact details of the reentry vehicle except for admitting that a reentry vehicle has been developed. The rest is pure speculation and hyperbole. Information about the reentry vehicles does not exist in the public domain. The information that is not from official news sources in this article and the information without references must be removed.Andy anno (talk) 03:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the content of the agni RV Mk2 to reflect the fact that the agni RV is better than only the first generation RV's developed by the US and the soviets and that it is more a single maneuverable payload as opposed to the first generation Indian as well as western(note that the P5 developed the first generation of missiles soon after WWII) which were just passive payloads on top of rockets.Andy anno (talk) 05:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tld|Globalize/India}} 

message: Why is it that the range in the infobox and article of the missiles don't match? For example the infobox shows the range of Agni II as 3300-4800 km (ICBM class) while it is stated in the first part of the article as 2500 km (MRBM class)? Something's wrong here, and can somebody with knowledge on the subject please clarify? Thanks  S3000  ☎ 10:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard range of agni II with a 1 ton warhead is reported to be 2500km. Also Agni V will not be designed to be of the ICBM class unless a lower capacity warhead is used since the drdo is targeting a range of 5000km officially not 6000km as it was stated in the article earlier inspite of the references showing it at 5000km. Andy anno (talk) 02:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: Well I've been looking at all the ref for the Agni-V, but when I look at it I see nothing stating that the Agni-IV is being called the Agni-V or anything about them skipping Agni-IV. In fact, ref 28 (the apparent closest to date ref article), still says there is an Agni-IV instead and not an Agni-V. Even ref 24 which is suppose to say that Agni-V was Agni-IV doesn't have a single thing about this. I'm no expert on this stuff, but when I read all the refs, it seems like they are developing 2 separate missiles that have equal range for some odd reason. Could someone clear this up, or at least add refs that clearly states that they are in fact the same missile. Spitfire8520 (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agni-V ? 

message: Separate articles need to be created for each and every Agni and from the presented article links can be provided to those Agni pages. There are so many Agni's and it's difficult to handle all in one page.
Agni-1
Agni-II
Agni-III
Agni-IIIA
Agni-V
Five missiles require five pages.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate articles

message: The image :File:Agni3 inflight PTI.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Agni3 inflight PTI.jpg

message: Why does this article state distances from Chinese cities?  Relations between China and India are presently friendly and I don't believe this article should reflect otherwise.
GSMR (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  China? 

message: Hi, congrats and many thanks for presenting this information and of course the references. It has been great reading about India's Missile capability and going by the performance data and specifications, it seems that Agni and Prithvi are far better and more important than our BrahMos. Anyway, there seems to be some problem with the velocity specification (the current page shows a 5-6 km/s). Is this right? I know for a fact that Agni does not do hypersonic yet and a speed of 5 km/s translates into about Mach 15!!
Pcsrao (talk) 06:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velocity of Agni Missiles? 

message: "most accurate strategic ballistic missiles of its range class in the world"
Based on the statement that these missiles get their terminal guidance from GPS. Wouldn't the US and ICBM capable NATO allies have the same capability?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.151.116 (talk) 06:38, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  C.E.P. 

message: hey could you put a picture of the Agni III missile on here there's plenty of them online and there have been many news reports showing the actual missile it self  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buklaodord (talk • contribs) 05:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures? 

message: Added verious sections to the article and various citations from news papers to support the text and uncited figures. also replaced a dead yahoo news citationa with a same working Deccan herald news site .--DℬigXЯay 00:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added sections to the article and various citations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Agni (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120531123718/http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2004/07/05/india-successfully-test-fired-agni-i to http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2004/07/05/india-successfully-test-fired-agni-i
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111014055123/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MISSILES/ballistic/agni-i.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MISSILES/ballistic/agni-i.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111014055123/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MISSILES/ballistic/agni-i.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MISSILES/ballistic/agni-i.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116001820/http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/bhubaneshwar/India-test-fires-nuclear-capable-Agni-IV-missile/Article1-769286.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/bhubaneshwar/India-test-fires-nuclear-capable-Agni-IV-missile/Article1-769286.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.arunachaltimes.in/national.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018150947/http://www.missilethreat.com/missilesoftheworld/id.9/missile_detail.asp to http://www.missilethreat.com/missilesoftheworld/id.9/missile_detail.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Agni (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111020140012/http://brahmand.com/news/Agni-Indias-fire-power/5787/1/15.html to http://www.brahmand.com/news/Agni-Indias-fire-power/5787/1/15.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140419013457/http://www.theindianrepublic.com/nation/india-successfully-conducts-maiden-night-test-agni-missile-100032236.html to http://www.theindianrepublic.com/nation/india-successfully-conducts-maiden-night-test-agni-missile-100032236.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120623165934/http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/agni-v-india-s-first-icbm-expected-to-be-test-fired-shortly-199325 to http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/agni-v-india-s-first-icbm-expected-to-be-test-fired-shortly-199325
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.arunachaltimes.in/national.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion