lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Serenade (Neil Diamond album)

message: SERENADE  is actually Neil Diamond's TENTH Studio Album, not his Ninth. Starting with "The Fell of Neil Diamond" (1967),his FIRST studio album, and continuing through all the studio albums listed here, it is noted that "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" was Neil Diamond's NINTH studio Album (duly noted), and thus, "SERENADE" must therefore be Neil's TENTH studio Album. It follows logically that Beautiful Noise" is Neil's ELEVENTH studio album, "I'm Glad You're Here With Me Tonight" is his TWELFTH studio album, and so on. I have read through 1977 Albums, so I am merely assuming that every album from "SERENADE" on are numbered one lower than they should be listed. These should all be updated.  Thank You. And I appreciate all the wonderful information. 
Organic Dad Mike (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SERENADE  is actually Neil Diamond's TENTH Studio Album, not his Ninth. 
Talk:Serious Moonlight (1983 film)

message: From what I can get from the sources (mostly Billboard), it looks like Love You till Tuesday and Serious Moonlight video were both released in May 1984, but I can't find exact release dates so I can't tell which came first. The video release of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars: The Motion Picture looks like it happened in August 1984, after both of these. I'm going to leave the chronology with Love You Till Tuesday first for now, since Love You Till Tuesday was the (much) older film and also I understand in some markets Serious Moonlight was released in two parts and the second part didn't come out until fall. If anyone finds exact release dates in a reliable source (like month-day-year), feel free to correct the chrono order if needed.TheBlinkster (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video chronology  - release dates
Talk:Situation (album)

message: The full track listing for this album appears to be listed here. Should this listing just be copied and pasted into the article? The interview appears to already be linked in the article, but I'm not sure if there's a reason the track listing hasn't been used. I'm not that big on editing the site, so I'm not entirely sure on whether the media article would be considered enough of a source. Thanks for any answers. --Mike7392000 15:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Track List

message: Anyone knows who's the artist who made the artwork of cover sleeve ? Really nice work ! Lvr (talk) 13:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover sleeve's artist 

message: :: On May 17, 2007, Buck 65's website posted a message saying that "Skratch Bastid and Roger Swan have begun mixing Buck 65's new record Situation at Hipposonic Studios in Vancouver." 
::On August 7th, Pitchfork media announced that Strange Famous Records would be releasing Situation in the US.  Skratch Bastid also confirmed that they had already finished a version of the album that was sample-heavy that they were afraid to release. This is the reason for the album's release date being pushed back. He also said information that would lead to believe that they would leak the original version of the album the day after the new version's official release date.
I removed all that stuff from the main article via this edit. If someone wants to try and pull out any information they see as useful and plug it back in (with correct grammar, etc), be my guest.-M.Nelson (talk) 01:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section
Talk:Cornish Foreshore Case

message: I've tagged this article due to problems with its content and the sources used to back it up. Much of the material here is sourced (footnotes 1,7,8,9,12) to what appear to be self-published websites run by an activist, John Angarrack. This material has not been properly attributed, and arguably it is unsuitable for inclusion altogether. Skimming through his "Duchy of Cornwall" website, much of it appears taken up with pretty bizarre and WP:FRINGE conspiracy theories about the deceit and constitutional skullduggery allegedly undertaken by Prince Charles and others. Surely there are serious legal and historical sources that can be used instead to provide proper content on this case and any broader issues that arise from it? Unless anyone can offer a convincing reason for retaining a lot of what is here currently, it needs to go. N-HH talk/edits 17:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been thinking about making some further changes to this page – it still treats this case as if it were a defining ruling on Cornwall's quasi-independence from the UK, when it appears to be no such thing, and instead simply an arbitration on a minor technical point. There are also factual errors, eg it was not about the ownership of the foreshore as such, but about mineral rights under the foreshore. The problem is that sources are limited: there's plenty on Cornish nationalist discussion boards but nothing much at all in serious authoritative sources or academic legal ones (which also kind of reinforces the point about it not being as significant – or even notable, although I'm loath to suggest outright deletion – as some people think; unless that's all part of the conspiracy). I'll keep looking and maybe try to make some changes. N-HH talk/edits 16:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources/Template
Talk:Some Call It Godcore

message: This is part of the catalogue for a band that has been releasing albums for 31 years, has enjoyed some chart success and is known (at least the name) by most adult Britons. There should be no question of its 'notability': it is just someone being a fusspot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.115.249.238 (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Spiritech

message: spiritech.com
spiritech.cc
spiritech.net  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.40.252.126 (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  add a 'May also refer to' section
Talk:Healthways (scuba gear company)

message: * It was one of the 5 original USA diving gear makers. As such, it is notable within the scuba diving community. And lots and lots of people scuba dive. Anthony Appleyard 12:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: *The article says "the first manufacturer to use "scuba"". That may be the first known all-lowercase use in a company publication, but likely divers and others were pronouncing SCUBA as a word, and in such semi-unofficial casual publications as scuba clubs' internal periodicals not being maximum careful with spelling and case of letters, for a long time before that. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First to use the term "scuba"?
Talk:Strawberry Jam

message: Is the review by Robert Christgau really necessary? His review is barely a sentence long, and hardly a meaningful one at that...he seems to have based his opinion on one lyric from the song "Peacebone". I suggest it be removed. --67.177.113.133 (talk) 00:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert Christgau Review

message: Why does For Reverend Green link to Home (band)? Dragosian (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverend Green
Talk:Telepathic with the Deceased

message: :Image:46811.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:46811.jpg
Talk:The Apostasy

message: I'm currently looking into the information regarding the bonus track and if its valid or not.
*Track was re-recorded but will likely appear on an EP release later.
Also, anyone know if the Horn Trio has a name or just the names of the performers?  How about the Choir?
LK Thurisaz 16:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus Track/Guests 

message: Who is it supposed to be? Might be useful to add to the page. BrainRotMenacer (talk) 04:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Art
Talk:St Joseph Engineering College

message: We need a photo for this article. --Anthony5429 12:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Require Photo 

message: 1. I've added one similar to the photograph found on the website.
2. Suggesting review of article class
3. More info under specific categories is necessary
Daniel Prabhu 13:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:The Faces I've Been

message: It’s in storage, so I don’t have the record to hand to check, but aren’t the raps on this album in-studio recordings, not live, as the article seems to suggest? They may be similar to the ones found on “The Last Concert Tour”, but they aren’t in front of an audience. Jock123 (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The raps aren’t live, are they…?
Talk:Nouveau Riche (Swedish band)

message: This section included links to wiki pages to very related artists, and in fact the only way one can find historic information about this band before the current line-up, all things that are not accessible on the official websites, seeing as I know it is a rule not to list fan sites. Dollvalley 12:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: I addedd the tag without noticing it because I used the Army Of Lovers page as structure to build on this one. However I think that seeing the groups in the list of the LGBT artists this qualifies. I don't have sources but if you look at their pictures, Ulrich is defo gay and I have read in several places he was bf with someone in the AOL/Vacumm/BWO big troupe, as for Dominika, being in AOL makes her LGBT-superfriendly at least. If you wanna remove the tag go ahead, but I haven't seen sources in several articles who qualify.  Dollvalley 09:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT tag
Talk:Waubra Wind Farm

message: The Wind Farm's satellite view's resemblance to USB cables has been mentioned by some media blogs, e.g. Gizmodo Australia. Not sure if it would be appropriate to mention in the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  USB cables 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:QIK

message: I clicked Qik to take me to the video-blogging site entry, but it just sent me back to this page. :/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.37.139.95 (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclic link 
Talk:1940 Canberra air disaster

message: This crash site is in the Majura district currently. Perhaps at one time it was Gungahlin, but saying it is Gungahlin is either an anachronism, or totally wrong. Using "Canberra" is better, as it was close to Canberra airport. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point, I did wonder about that when I saw the ACT's districts weren't actually created until decades after the crash. I wonder if the exact coordinates of the site are available somewhere? Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I see they're already there. If those are accurate then Gungahlin seems way out. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: not Gungahlin

message: Consensus is article by article. So for this one, we want to keep the victims in the list. There are not many, and they are connected to each other, it is not undue, so it makes more sense to list them than to leave out a couple. This was not just a run of the mill crass, but one that affected notable people. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Notably, the Smolensk air disaster, which instantly came to mind as the closest example I could think of, has a full list of victims. There are plenty of sources about Thornethwaite's life and career (if independent notability possibly questionable due to WP:ONEEVENT) and it's difficult to explain the events that led to the sitting Treasurer not getting killed in the crash without mentioning Elford. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: List of who died
Talk:Australian and International Pilots Association

message: Hello, I’m currently working on a university project that requires me to submit improvements for the stub because it was request in the WikiProject.
Improving this resource
-	Adding the following sub headings: Background, history, affiliated unions and political movements and strikes. Adding these titles and content under these headings will improve the quality and content of the article. 
-	The following sources can be useful for adding quality content: 
https://centreforaviation.com/data/profiles/industry-associations/aipa
http://www.unionsnsw.org.au/industrial_officer_aipa
https://www.aipa.org.au/
Feedback on the improvements is invited!
--Artsandsocialwork (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve this Page
Talk:Andy Hurley/Archive 1

message: "Take This to Your Grave" is technically their first full length album since "Fall Out Boy's Evening Out with Your Girl" is considered an EP, not an LP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spuddy 17 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is this page locked? It's got pretty much nothing on it anyways! (The-kid-was-alright 06:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why...?
Talk:A Band in Hope

message: Although erased, this quote came from lead singer Shawn Harris's weblog. It is not only saved other places on the web but on people's private computers. To say this quote came from the noted citation is copyright infringement itself. 130.126.77.127 (talk) 07:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are going to include a quote you need to cite it. Also, that is far more material than is necessary. For these reasons it verges on copyright violation. It would be much better to summarize what he said in the quote.--DO11.10 (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page does NOT need deletion. 
Talk:Australian–American Memorial

message: Should this be in this list? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_buildings_and_structures_in_the_Australian_Capital_Territory ---- Darakat 7/5/2013
:Yes sounds a reasonable idea as it is a structure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Generation-skipping transfer tax

message: Because the Estate Tax expired completely in 2010 (but likely will return in 2011), that signfiicantly affects people with trusts like this who could die in 2010.   Someone with actual tax law credentials should probably add a new section to this article warning of the dangers and possible unintended consequences.69.37.68.72 (talk) 00:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 developments 

message: From a user who edited the main article page (edit has since been reverted and moved here): "For generation-skipping trusts created in the years of 2011 and 2012 and for outright gifts to skip-persons, taxpayers are entitled to a $5 million GST tax exemption. [THESE AMOUNTS ARE OUT-OF-DATE]"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yerkes-Dodson (talk • contribs) 23:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 Update Requested 

message: A section about why the GST exists (other than to complicate the lives of people who give away or receive money) would be useful in the article.  The reason for every tax is "to suck money out of productive people and feed it to a government" but this one is so strange that there has to be more to it than that.  --Gnuish (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be an intuition that leaving property to grandchildren is cheating on one layer of inheritance tax. —Tamfang (talk) 21:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation of the GST tax?
Talk:List of municipalities in Illinois (by population)

message: How come Cicero isn't on this list?
Um, yeah this list is very inaccurate... I'm going to try and fix it, according to the 2000 census. Kkemper 16:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Needs attention or maybe merge with another? --Funandtrvl (talk) 17:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned article
Talk:FlashGot

message: Hi. The following is the list of article changes in revision 466982878 on 21 December 2011 made by me.
#Established article's notability.
#Changed "Genre" to Firefox extension". There is no source to believe that works with any other Mozilla product.
#Added a more detailed overview.
#Merged two sections ("Metalink support" and "search refinements") into one "Overview" section.
#Removed stub template, since it is no longer a stub.
#Deleted "Supported download managers" section per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. (I am open to undo but it was outdated too.)
#Deleted  since it was irrelevant
#Tweaked infobox a bit
#Applied JS: fixing MoS and other miscellaneous style problems
Fleet Command (talk) 06:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary of  revision 466982878 

message: Flashgot was never "discontinued" by its author. 
It was made nonfunctional by reckless bad faith updates to Firefox from the Mozilla Foundation - but that is probably not the way we can describe it here. Reckless because Mozilla destroyed hundreds of good and popular Addons in the process, and bad faith because Mozilla simultaneously engaged in in a campaign of outright lies and doublespeak explaining to the wider public that the new API would be as good as the old one and that authors only had to do some minor adaption work to do, thus blaming the addon authors for the breakage that resulted from Mozilla's malfeasance.
Obviously none of this was even remotely true. 
In that context, "discontinued" is a direct acceptance of Mozilla's propaganda and thus NPOV. Also, Flashgot is still available for Mozilla-forked browsers like Palemoon and Waterfox.
I therefore challenge "discontinued" as unsourced and will remove it from the lead. Wefa (talk) 22:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I take issue with the "discontinued" description
Talk:General (Australia)

message: This is an error; Birdwood's rank of general in the AIF was substantive, not honorary. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Hawkeye. Please see reference 2, from the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette, confirming that Birdwood was granted the honorary rank of general in the Australian Army. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Abraham. Officers who held rank in the AIF were granted that rank in the AMF as honorary rank after the war. Birdwood's AIF file says that he was appointed to the AIF as a lieutenant general on 18 September 1915, promoted to general on 23 October 1917, and his AIF appointment was terminated on 10 September 1920. (I found his promotion to honorary field marshal in the CMF on 17 December 1925. ) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Hawkeye. The AIF was an expeditionary force, though, and as you say wartime ranks didn't necessarily translate to substantive promotions in the permanent or part-time forces. The promotions noted in the AIF record correspond with Birdwood's advancement to lieutenant general and general in the British Army, as promulgated in the London Gazette. There doesn't appear to be anything in the AIF file or the London Gazette, however, to indicate that Birdwood's promotions were actually in the Australian forces. Instead, the promotions were in the regular British forces and were granted while Birdwood was in command of a Dominion corps. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 14:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The AIF equivalent is the AIF General Orders. There is a bound copy in the War Memorial. Note that Birdwood's AIF appointment was terminated in 1920, but his British Army appointment was not. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birdwood's rank
Talk:The Very Best of Leo Sayer

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 00:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:There's a Kind of Hush All Over the World

message: I have a pretty strong memory of hearing this song played on AM radio on the night that it was announced that the War in Vietnam was over directly after the "special report" was made. I would ♥ to add this to the article but no idea how to find a playlist from that night or a reference for it. I know that it was at night because I had insomnia as a kid and slept with my am radio on. Pretty sure it was 77, but could have been 66. TeeVeeed (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  77 WABC or 66 WNBC am radio playlist?
Talk:Legal terrorism

message: Is it just me, or does linking a vague political term to a specific area seem a tad bit misleading? Calling the dowry law of India "legal terrorism" seems quite offensive, akin redirecting Bullshit to Law of the United States. PotentialDanger (talk) 00:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect or delete?

message: I arrived at this redirect from an entirely unrelated page. The impression was political vandalism, hence my deletion. I see now that a redirect consensus was reached from an earlier version of the page. I don't have an account anymore (no patience with the hostility and politics), so I haven't attempted to call a vote on this content deletion.
Revert if you wish, but consider that:
* the pages linking to Legal terrorism have no continuity with the topic Dowry laws of India.
* the latter is not a generalization of the former, rather at best an instance of it.
Redirecting is plain misleading at best, especially given the source articles. The use of the term in India, referenced in the vote, whether real or not, is a subject for a national language WP version. Absent an article on Legal terrorism, where a "See also" or other mention may be appropriate, it is impossible for me (as a reader, not editor) to experience the redirect as other than POV. This redirect was an epic QA fail...
85.200.17.164 (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted content

message: I came here from a general legal wikipage on Chilling_Effects. I was expecting to read about harassment by state or private actors through legal means. Indian dowry laws seem way to specific for such a broad term.
109.33.67.73 (talk) 10:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree with the above