lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

message: In the version current at the time of writing this, there was a curious error in the automatic numbering of the notes. In the infobox, the superscript [2] links to the note numbered 19; this throws out all the other notes in the range 3-18. I going to make a trivial edit to the page and save it again to see if this disappears. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It didn't, so I'll report this. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in note numbers

message: The six cases itemised would be better in date order (1871, 1916, 1934, 1994, 1995, 1995) rather than in alpha (where incidentally two are currently out-of-order as A&M, GRam, GOdf, Levy, Stewt, Univ). Also each should outline a different specific area of copyright ruling, and most (but not all) do that. But the first (the case of A&M-v-VCI 1995) does not describe any ruling - instead it summarises by asking four questions without giving any answers. It therefore seems incomplete (ie. no clear guidance for the reader). And the third case (Godfrey-v-Lees 1995) says the Claimant established joint authorship but was stopped from revoking the Defendant's licence due to a passage of time - followed by a fourth case (Levy-v-Rutley 1871) from over 100 years earlier (!) that defines the concept of joint authorship but spends half of its description on an exact repeat of the third case (Godfrey-v-Lees 1995) wording - while leaving out the third's crucial 'passage of time' failure. This ordering of the two cases (Godfrey followed by Levy) is like putting the "cart" ahead of the "horse-and-duplicate-cart-with-one wheel-missing". The whole section could/should be corrected or improved by better minds than me, ie. people with a specific knowledge of copyright law and its most relevant cases. But I'll make a start (else it may take weeks or months until someone else steps in), by revising the list-order and removing the duplicate text. Pete Hobbs (talk) 13:03, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion in the sub-section listing of 'Relevant Cases' 

message: S. 67 omitted (1.1.2011) by virtue of The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (Amendment) Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/2694), art. 3(1)
S52 was omitted.
Others may need checking. A comment on the implications or reasons for the amendment would be useful. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/uksi/2010/2694 31 August 2020 (UTC) I've started reviewing some of these.Flannelot (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date sections: 
Talk:Storm Boy (1976 film)

message: The "Paul Smith" can't be Paul Smith (Australian actor), despite the fact that he is credited on IMDB; because Paul Smith (Australian actor) was 9 years old at the time and first auditioned to act when he was 13. Plus the fact that his role is as a hunter, an unlikely role for a 9 year old. So I've guessed they used someone local, and renamed him to Paul Smith (South Australian actor). Peter Ballard (talk) 04:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Smith 

message: It seems that this version has been vandalized. Will try to make some improvements... Shane (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Milad

message: This article is completely wrong. Mild in Persian means "Birth" and therefore its only common for the birth of Islam Prophet Mohammed.
:The article is not wrong at all. Milad does in Persian mean "birth" and came to mean celebration of Muhammad. However, from this, in the subcontinent, Milad just means any religious ceremony, held for various reasons, from the opening of a business or moving into a new home. This is explained in the article. Tanzeel 16:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Wahhabies are tireless in their Jihad to say that anything not belonging to their sect is not Islam.  So I have given up removing their propoganda links but have kept them seperate to show that they are not the mainstream view but that of a minority sect. Hassanfarooqi 17:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wahhabi Links 

message: The origin of the word Milad is Aramaic. 
https://books.google.com/books/about/Vol_2_ETYMOLOGY_PHILOLOGY_AND_COMPARATIV.html?id=Rr87DwAAQBAJ Wikileb123 (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This reference does not state it's origin. Volume 3, however, makes mention of it but the reference states that it was originally Arabic and that the Aramaic word 'Moalada' itself comes from the archaic Arabic word. Therefore it is originally Arabic, not Aramaic. Meeladi (talk) 06:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Sport Ranger

message: Sportranger is very similar to Japanese Super Sentai? 
Every Thai knows we're trying to rip them off blalantly. Can't we change it to "Sport Ranger is a blalant ripoff of Super Sentai"?  :P Suredeath 10:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but that's not encyclopedic. Call it an homage instead of a blatant ripoff. Ryūlóng 10:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Hey, if you are Thai, maybe you can help contribute to the article. No Super Sentai fan knows Thai. Ryūlóng 10:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That wouldn't explain this website http://www.thai-toku.com Super Sentai is huge in Thailand, and I'm in US right now. So I haven't seen it yet.Suredeath 15:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... I've seen tokubrazil, but not thai-toku before. Still, it may be a "blatant ripoff", it's just not right to say such things in an encyclopedia entry. Ryūlóng 20:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there a compelling reason per WP:SPOILER for the spoiler warning on this article? Phil Sandifer 15:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler warning 

message: Do you think Sport Ranger is based on/or similar to Mahou Sentai Magiranger? Starkiller88 15:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sport Ranger based on [[Magiranger]]?
Talk:Tagbanwa

message: Is Tag Banwa derived from the Tagalog phrase 'Tag banua' - meaning 'people of a particular place'? If so, it is cognate with the Maori 'tangata whenua' meaning the people of a place or particular nation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:336F:DF00:655A:EBCA:3DE4:E1F6 (talk) 10:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagbanwa cognate?
Talk:Anti-personnel weapon

message: What should we do w/ this article? It doesn't have any sources or much interest, seemingly. :( Maybe it should be deleted? Or roll much of its text into bigger, more established articles? idk... Azx2 16:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If kept it would benefit from aggressive copy-editing. Stylistically it is rather chatty, not the right tone for an encyclopedia article. DCDuring (talk) 15:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What to do?
Talk:Short-range ballistic missile

message: I find it hard to believe (you need not read further then there military page on wikipedia) that they have the technical capacity to assemble missiles. I mean they do spend like 2.0 billion dollars on there military and such but still I still think more solid facts are needed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.95.46.162 (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Phillipines
Talk:Quasiballistic missile

message: Are quasiballistic missiles always ballistic for at least part of their flight?  If so, the first paragraph can be tidied to make this clear.  Earthlyreason (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Always ballistic?

message: I wonder if the term quasiballistic missile is in such widespread use, that it deserves its own article. Perhaps this should rather be just a subchapter in the ballistic missile article? Offliner (talk) 14:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this term in widespread use? 

message: I propose merging this article into ballistic missile. This article is short, has only few sources, and the term quasiballistic missile is not in widespread use. Any objections? Offliner (talk) 10:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no objections, I have now completed merging this article to ballistic missile. Offliner (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Quake Lake

message: After recent earthquake in China, the Quake Lake has been in news. It appears that "Quake Lake" is general term used for lakes created after an earthquake. However, this article only describes lake in southwestern Montana, United States.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.237.147 (talk) 04:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Quake lake" being used in this sense is probably colloquial, but I've linked this article to landslide dam, which explains the general phenomenon.--Pharos (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: quake lake

message: Does anyone think it might be possible to get a cituation for the list of deaths?James.Denholm (talk) 00:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering that too. I hate to sound callous, but I'm not sure if the list of names is that helpful to the article... the exact number and a link ought to be good enough. --Explodicle (T/C) 14:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed Souls list 
Talk:Waterton Lake

message: The river should have its own article; the decription is also incomplete in this form, or unclear anyway:
The Waterton River flows north from the lower lake through the Waterton Reservoir by the village of Hill Spring. It continues north and discharges into the Belly River, a tributary of the Oldman River.
<P>
The total length of the river is 80 km (50 mi).
Is that length including the river's upper reaches in Montana?? Because it does have a stretch in Montana; see .  River and lake articles should not be combined like this, either....Skookum1 (talk) 03:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Waterton River]] should not redirect here
Talk:Kentucky Historical Society

message: Hey - does anyone know anything about the mahogany doors from this ship? They were donated while she was still under construction, and were used in an officer's club in NYC until the early 90s, when they were returned to the KHS in January 1994. Did the Society use them for anything? Parsecboy (talk) 13:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doors from [[USS Kentucky (BB-66)]]
Category talk:Towns and villages of the Peak District

message: Created after discussion in Talk:Peak District. --VinceBowdren 10:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category creation

message: Hi just to let you all know, I have changed the description for this category so that only places within the National park and close proximity can be added to it. This has been done after discussion in Talk:Peak District in order to avoid adding places which are too far from the region, which may confuse and mislead some people as a result. Broman178 (talk) 09:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category description change
Talk:Héloïse

message: Discussions up to now were outdated and have been archived. I have moved some material in this article to a new article, Letters of Abelard and Heloise. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived talk page, created new article for the Letters

message: This seems to have been a misapplication by a single editor of . This was a medieval figure and there were no diacritics in her name to respect. There's no more connection to these dots and slashes than to Eloise or Elizabeth and less connection to them than to Heloisa, not that we should use that either. There's no actual reason not to apply the   name to this major historical figure. That name is Heloise, just like we have "Roma" at Rome, "Adélaïde d'Aquitaine" at Adelaide of Aquitaine, andmost obviously and damningly"Pierre Abélard" at Peter Abelard. The only things using this name accomplishes is forcing the vast majority of users to come via the redirect of the name they actually use and creating a mistaken sense of modernity and foreignness to the figure.
No, this isn't a close call. Heloise is vastly more common in standard and scholarly English. Yes, the previous move was a mistaken  of one editor without discussion and based on misapplication of policy. Yes, the page should be moved to its overwhelmingly more common English form, just like Abelard. — LlywelynII 01:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[Heloise]]

message: Really? She says 'I'd prefer to be your mistress', and sure, 'I'd like to be your whore', but that really doesn't equal 'I'd like to be a prostitute', and I can't see any 'honesty about sex work [sic]'. I spy a rather right-on anachronism?Katiehawks (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex Work
Talk:Heavy machine gun

message: Good length, good content; I won't pretend I've read the whole thing, but a cursory examination indicates that it's thorough and well-written. But there needs to be sectioning I think.  LordAmeth 08:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: This Lewis Gun is a light machine gun, and the statement "...What made it very useful was that it was significantly lighter than water-cooled weapons, but could fire nearly as much due to a very large cooling assembly" is nonsensical.  The "large cooling assembly" is an aluminum tube with internal fins using the muzzle blast to supposedly force air through the tube to cool the barrel.  Experience in WW2 showed that the cooling tube was not required, but the lack of a quick-change barrel and the use of a magazine vs. belted ammo made the Lewis incapable of acting as a heavy machine gun (which it was not designed to do anyway.) GMan552 (talk) 06:34, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "Lewis Gun" section
Talk:Jace Clayton

message: As of this moment, this article is located at DJ /rupture, and I’m curious if this is an acceptable title. Lowercase as a form of stylization is not prohibited as per MOS:TMRULES. There’s no blanket prohibition against slashes in mainspace titles—even though they make the talk pages appear to be associated with a different article (in this case, the redirect ). But this slash isn’t functional in any way, so I feel like it should be subject to whatever guideline requires A$AP Rocky’s bio to be located at ASAP Rocky. I’ve tried to find that bit of the MOS, but haven’t been successful. Anyone know the answer? —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 20:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legit article title?
Talk:Mountain gun

message: Assessed as "NA" because this is a list.  Might be bettre to rename it if it maintains its current form.--Looper5920 22:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Dear Ron,
I went and got a better link for the PopSci 1941 article. Googlebooks shows just the one page with no side ads, etc.  Also that Mountain Gun article to be honest stinks.  A lot of early history is left out.  For example the first actual mountain gun was by the British in the American Rebellion.  It was a 3 prd called the "Grasshopper" for way it bounced when being towed by one horse.  I have been looking all over my house and book cases for a rare manual I got on that dang thing.  It was an important weapon in the Napoleon Wars (Spain especially) and in America during the War of 1812 and then India.  After that came a 12 pdr that the US developed I think from a British design.  It was an important weapon during the Mexican-American 1847-49 War and the American Civil War. After the American Civil War various muzzle loaders were developed but then Krupp and Hotkiss developed Quick Firing breach loaders with fixed casing.  I am going to see what I can obtain for documentation. Jack --Jackehammond (talk) 06:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for ! We certainly need the broader historical picture to give a balanced story. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 07:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page Need a lot of work!!!!
Talk:Stoneman

message: Beerman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Man  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.6.97 (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also 

message: This article is incomplete and is missing important citations for its information. Considering that the Stoneman is one of the most famous unidentified serial killers in India, this article should be a lot better developed and sourced than this. It does have potential to become GA or FA status (EVERY article does), but it requires more attention be given to it. The article lacks significant amount of detail on each on the murders the Stoneman committed and each murder should be given its own sub-section and be written in greater detail than what it currently has and with proper citations. There should also be information on the background or precursor to the killings as well. A great amount of information remains unsourced and needs to be either removed or given proper citations. This article is very interesting and hopefully someone can work on it so that it's the best it can possibly be.--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and Expansion 

message: Looking at this article, there are no citations to any of the information. All information must be given proper citations from reliable sources or, if none can be found they should be removed from the article. I found a couple of sources that can be used for this article, these contain some good information about the Stoneman:
* India News: Police Hunt Kolhapur Serial Killer with Eerie Similarities to Unsolved Stoneman Murders of 1980s
* 
* REVEALED: Mystery behind Kolkata's dreaded serial killer 'Stoneman'
* 
* 8 Indian Serial Killers Who Will Give You GooseBumps
* 
* Indian police hunt 'stone man' killer
* 
* The unsolved mystery of Kolkata's Stoneman
* 
* A Calcutta Murderer Slinks From Depths of Depravity
* 
* The Stoneman Returns
* 
* Rajkot ‘stone killer’ held for 3 murders, labourer for fourth
--Paleface Jack 17:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Alfred Coppola

message: I recall seeing advertising on the local buses for a campaign for Buffalo mayor that Mr. Coppola participated in when he was council member from the Delaware district. If a cite can be found sourcing this that should be added to the article.1archie99 (talk) 16:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not unflattering; but does need more content and citations.
Talk:Binding constant

message: Apart from the math, which I don't pretend to understand, the English of the article seems fine with regards to spelling and grammar. Perhaps this article should be removed of its copyedit tag, to let the wikify tag suffice?
--Arkeides 21:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit status? 

message: Why is affinity of proteins an ligands calculated here with a formula "Gibbs Free Energy" in which the ideal gas constant R is used. Proteins and ligands are not gases since they reside in aqueous cytoplasm or in the lipid membrane.
I would consider to shorten this article, and after having stated that Kb (or Ka) is the inverse of Kd (dissociation constant) make a link and refer to the Kd page that is better developed and has more information.
Phacelias (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideal Gas Constant
Talk:Glycogenin

message: 4th/Sep changes:removed "the initiation of" because arguable synthesis begins with formation of glucose to G6P (which then becomes G1P then UDP-glucose and only then glycogen)
Unsure yet how to reference, but used "Lehinger Principles of Biochemistry", David L Nelson and Michael M. Cox, 4th Ed., Ch15
ShaiM 11:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Support – Glyogenin is an enzyme while EC 2.4.1.186 (glycogenin glucosyltransferase) is the reaction catalyzed by this enzyme.  Strictly speaking, the two are different.  However the two subjects are so interrelated (the enzyme is autocatalytic; the enzyme catalyzes attachment of glucose to itself). So I believe they should be merged.  However I am checking to make sure no one objects.   Boghog (talk) 20:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article says that the residue where the growth of the glucose chain happens is Tyr-194. Numerous studies say it is Tyr-194, but many others also claim it is Tyr-195 (ex1). Some even claim it is Tyr-195, but cite a source where it is claimed to be Tyr-194 in the headline (ex2, 8th ref "...Tyrosine 194 is essential for function"). Which one is it? Keministi (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tyr-194 or Tyr-195, which one?
Talk:Grand Conseil

message: The article is currently mixing up the roles of the Grand Conseil and the Conseil privé (aka Conseil des parties). This should be clearly disambiguated, using the excellent paper published by the National Archives of France which describes the origins and the differences between the Grand Conseil and the Conseil privé: . Any editor fluent in France willing to do this? There is currently no article for the Conseil privé. There is only limited information about it at Conseil d'Etat#History, but this should be moved out of the article (the current Conseil d'État is very different from the ancient Conseil privé) and put in a dedicated Conseil privé article. For those wishing to create the Conseil privé article, you could also translate Conseil privé from fr.wikipedia which is quite a good presentation of this Conseil. Hardouin 11:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference between the Conseil privé and the Grand Conseil are discussed at Conseil du Roi, although I still have more to translate from the fr wiki for that page to be complete.--NYArtsnWords 15:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I finished my translation to Conseil du Roi, and added material here to Grand Conseil to highlight the differences between it and the Conseil privé.--NYArtsnWords 21:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Kadathur

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 23:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Kadathur (Dharmapuri) →  – Massviews of the pages that could have the ambiguous title leave this topic looking like the primary, so the old move to a qualified title wasn't needed. The existing redirect would be deleted to return this page to the base name. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 October 2020
Talk:Deep Listening Band

message: "(this must be 4.5 seconds or 4 to 5 seconds, as 45 seconds cannot be obtained in even the most expensively designed reverberation chambers which have reverberation times of about 10 seconds at best)"
Moved this from the article, as it was a comment on the accuracy, rather than encyclopaedic text. 45 seconds sounds perfectly plausible to me, that's a BIG chamber. Discuss/research then edit if necessary.
Mullet 11:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverberation 

message: "They have also performed, recorded, and released a trope on John Cage's 4'33". Non Stop Flight released by Music&Arts in a 70 minute excerpt from the 4 hours and 33' trope." Which sense of trope (music) is meant here? The second sentence is unclear because it is grammatically ambiguous. — Sebastian 06:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trope
Talk:Winston Davis

message: The wikipedia entry lists the accident which left him paralysed as 1998, yet http://www.wasu.org.uk/whos-who.html lists the year as 1997. Which is correct, if either?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.214.206 (talk) 12:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of his accident?