lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Washington State Republican Party

message: The lawsuit by the Libertarian party, contesting the Republican party's status as a major political party, has been thrown out, essentially establishing as case law that the Republican party is a major political party, .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.93.210 (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a "minor" political party 

message: This article by the Seattle Times gives coverage of the activities of the King County GOP (which is part of the wider Washington State Republican Party). They are still spreading false and discredited claims and conspiracy theories of voter and election fraud in the 2020 presidential election. They are also proposing voting reforms because of these false claims. I believe this information should be included to battle against misinformation and bring attention to the fact that a minority (but still important) party here in Washington is promoting false claims in a continuation to debase a legit election. The given source is a reliable as well for Washington State-related news and analysis. SlackingViceroy (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this information be included? 

message: Why is Washington Republican party is "right-wing"? What's the source? It's more moderate conservative Ruhrob (talk) 07:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Partido Republicano Puertorriqueño

message: I wonder if its worth mentioning that on the island he is frequently referred to as Milhouse Van Houten, referencing the character on The Simpsons.  People think he looks like Milhouse.  I know its really silly, but its so common here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.12.184 (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What exactly is the relationship between the Republican Party and the New Progressive Party?  Is the NPP just the Puerto Rican branch of the Republican party?  Or are they somehow separate and/or overlapping? --Jfruh (talk) 23:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPP?
Talk:Vermont Republican Party

message: It's in the reliable sources that I revealed. In Wiki, South Korea, Vermont's GOP also saw that it was exceptionally liberal and had modern liberal colors. (I'm a South Korean.)--Storm598 (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 1974 was 47 years ago.  Howard Dean was a long time ago.  These do not reflect the current status of the VPR. Do not restore without a consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vermont's GOP is much more liberal than other states' GOPs.
Talk:Utah Republican Party

message: I've started to delete the non-specific, unsourced stuff in this article, but obviously there is a ways to go yet.  I'm looking at stuff like "The Members of the Utah Republican Party are grateful to Almighty God for life and liberty" for example.  Please discuss.--Thelema12 (talk) 21:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempting fixes 

message: Why "Utah" is much more likely to be Republican? Why is it much more common for "Utah" is much more likely to be Republican?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.125.108 (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican 

message: Is there someone who is competent to fix this problem who can take a look? Michael-Ridgway (talk) 19:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combo box on top right is missing the vice chair and the treasurer
Talk:Asynchronous learning

message: Why are there no info on products thst demonstrate on the application of the above? James-TRL (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Because we're not here to advertise products or promote them. ElKevbo (talk) 04:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples of Asynchronous Learning technoolgy 

message: — Assignment last updated by Sss88891 (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue

message: 202319 8646 77643135459494986434345 59.152.1.60 (talk) 06:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://bazzi365.pro
Talk:Central European Journal of International and Security Studies

message: Thank you for uploading :Image:Logo main.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Logo main.gif

message: I removed the notability bar for a few reasons. First, I have added external links and additional information showing why this is a notable journal. Second, indexing efforts are now under way. It appears that CEJISS is now listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (as of this week). And thirdly, a new volume of this journal will begin next month. CEJISS book reviews have also recently landed backcover  quotes on books published by prominent academic publishing houses.Eurosec200 (talk) 05:40, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Cognitive academic language proficiency

message: The concept of Basic interpersonal communicative skills was developed only to be a counterpart for contrast with Cognitive academic language proficiency. I have found no sources which discuss this concept in depth without merely treating it as an introduction to the main topic of CALP. In fact, the Basic interpersonal communicative skills Wikipedia article currently discusses mostly CALP and not its purported subject. (Furthermore, merely my opinion: It was never conceptually refined enough to be useful in its own right for scholars working in language acquisition or language proficiency.) Daask (talk) 06:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Basic interpersonal communicative skills]] into [[Cognitive academic language proficiency]]
Talk:Coparenting

message: Quite a chunk of this is written in reference to Italian law; it seems that the article was sporked from it:wikipedia and so needs balancing out. I will take a swipe at it soon, but if anyone else wants to jump in please do pablo 10:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What does spork mean?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C0:6780:2FB0:0:0:0:C9BB (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy 

message: The section "Post Separation Parenting" contains uncited claims of gender discrimination.  It also contains uncited references to Parental Alienation Syndrome.  While some parents and children are undoubtedly alienated, there is no such "syndrome" with which someone can be diagnosed. These claims are typical of anti-feminist men's groups; the article should be carefully reviewed for NPOV.  I have tagged where appropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.192.82.71 (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims of gender discrimination and "parental alienation syndrome" 

message: I have a nitpicky issue with the intro.  Specifically, this sentence: 
"In the United States the term coparenting is often used to describe the relationship between two separated or divorced parents attempting to parent their shared children."
The word 'attempting' makes it sound like it doesn't really work, or at least not work often.  That's just my opinion on word choice, though, and not backed by any research as to whether it actually does work.
I edited this to be more neutral.
Wolololol (talk) 00:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro
Talk:The Picks

message: Many of the internal links are just plain wrong. Article creator notified, and hopefully will fix. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Links 

message: John Pickering & Bill Pickering : same names wrong people.Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dittos
Talk:Rhode Island Republican Party

message: I'm removing a lot of recently added material as it is of little relevance to a state party article.  This diff removed a long unorganized list of references; I mention it here since they may be of use if they can be re-added in a more useful way. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 12:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ri.gop/platform. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:42, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Otte Wallish

message: Here's a designer who played a pivotal role in the symbolic representation of Israel's establishment as a nation state.
Yes, you all are welcome to debate the name of the article. But please first see the discussion in the text and please do NOT move this page until there's been full discussion and a rename proposal.
Can anybody locate an obituary for this article? Either Hebrew or English? thanks, HG | Talk 18:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: His 1941 book lists him as Wallisch, his 1947 book as Wallish. HG | Talk 22:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start up 
Talk:New York Republican State Committee

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Category talk:New York (state) Democrats § Unnecessary qualifier?.  Rockhead126 (talk) 19:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Category talk:New York (state) Democrats#Unnecessary qualifier?|Category talk:New York (state) Democrats §&nbsp;Unnecessary qualifier?]]
Talk:Nevada Republican Party

message: The history of the US Republican Party is spelled out clearly in that article. There is no reason to repeat it here. It is tangentially related to that of the Nevada Republican Party, and should be removed. And the headings added violate WP:HEAD. Ground Zero | t 02:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: history of the US Republican Party

message: I have fixed the grammatical error in the party platform section -- it started off being about the Nevada Republican Party, which is an it, but all of the personal and possessive pronouns afterward were "they" and "their", without ever saying who "they" were. 
It is incorrect to repeat article titles in the section headings - see WP:HEAD. And see WP:HEAD also about the capitalization of section headings. The Wikipedia style is to capitalize the words the same way you capitalize words in a sentence, i.e., you don't capitalize every word, just the first word and proper nouns. Ground Zero | t 19:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Other edits
Talk:Nebraska Republican Party

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox
Talk:Hothousing

message: The article does not explain what hothousing is, only that parents need to study it carfully, and that it is criticized by many. Of the four external links, three are broken, and the fourth deals with aging. All in all, the article is void of content and should be expanded or deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.227.206.215 (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is void of content
Talk:Industry-oriented education

message: Content-wise, this article looks like it doesn't belong under its own lemma and should rather be integrated into a broader article, e.g. vocational education. Moreover, the sources - only studies co-authored or authored by Qi - suggest that this might be an attempt at academic self-promotion (which Wikipedia shouldn't be a platform for). --Arbraxan (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with vocational education?
Talk:Le Moniteur Universel

message: France was not a Republic in 1868. Drutt (talk) 04:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a republic

message: The article says the paper stopped publishing in 1901 and then that it quit in 1868.
Some clarification would be good.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.108.185 (talk) 22:23, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing regarding date of cessation
Talk:Sokoban Deluxe

message: I think the game name is misspelled, but I don't have confirmation on whether it should remain as is, be changed to Soukoban Deluxe, or changed to Sokoban Deluxe.  I know that either of the latter two is "correct" based on means of translation, and that the most common english title assigned to this game "Soukoban Deluxe" (which differs from most other Sokoban titles). --Sigma 7 (talk) 23:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:International Community School (Kirkland, Washington)

message: I deleted the paragraphs regarding The Line because as of May 4, 2009, the school does have a newspaper where anyone can contribute. The new club was approved by the ASB executive council and voted on by the General Assembly. As such, the information about the Line is irrelevant and only detracts from the quality of of this website.
I personally feel that that entire section needs to be deleted because it lacks any verifiable source and is not presented in a neutral view.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.26.148 (talk) 05:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: please let me edit :) 168.99.199.28 (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Cannolis (talk) 15:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2021
Talk:W. Reece Smith Jr.

message: * Additional background info & picture needed. Jccort (talk) 22:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving the Article 
Talk:Cornwall Central School District

message: Disclosure statement: I, the creator of this article, have been a paid employee of this district in the past as a substitute teacher and could be again in the future. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KBWC

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the radio station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the ICAO code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 10:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Cup-to-disc ratio

message: This causes me no end of issues when I go to the optometrist, but my father has deep cupping as have all of the children in the family. Basically, we have a high cup to disc ratio naturally. It was deep when we were first tested by the eye doctor and it has stayed at that ratio throughout my life. As a result, every time we get a new eye doctor, we have to go through the same array of glaucoma tests before the doctor is convinced that we're not in the midst of glaucoma. Frankly, it's rather annoying. -Fuzzy (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hereditary cupping without glaucoma

message: This article would improve if it had clarification (perhaps figures) and some additional references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.173.196.120 (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs clarification and citation 

message: Hi, I changed the sentence that was implying that glaucoma and high intraocular pressure was the same. Although high intraocluar pressure is in most cases the (main) reason for glaucoma, there are also glaucoma variants with normal intraocular pressure (<21mmHg) and vice versa not everyone with high intraocular pressure has a glaucoma. The guidlines changed same years ago ;-)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.230.1.27 (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  glaucoma and high intraocular pressure are not synonyms
Talk:Willow Bunch, Saskatchewan

message: Patricia W. Elliott (talk) 17:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Avraham Trahtman

message: The article states:
:"Trahtman's road coloring problem solution was accepted and published in 2007 by the Israel Journal of Mathematics."
As of July 2009, it appears that the article is not yet published in that journal. 88.68.29.91 (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Road coloring article published?
Talk:Universal Migrator

message: Shouldn't we just combine the articles at this point?  Leaving them seperate is mildly silly.  Especially after the release-as-one-album thing a few years back, there is little point in treating them as two seperate albums.  春・Harukaze・風 18:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I will suggest the merge on the articles and wait a few days to make sure there are no objections. Neelix (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, both albums are musically different, contain different subjects in their songs and both articles have much information. Merging them would result in a quite long article, I think.  Victor Lopes (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why disambiguate?
File talk:Declaration of Independence (1819), by John Trumbull.jpg

message: The French description has the names of the "five-man drafting committee". Why doesn't the English version? 
From left to right, John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin.
Filé gumbo (talk) 10:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Description

message: This is such an important picture. Could we find a higher quality version? —ScouterSig 18:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree! Higher resolution! --Kvuo (talk) 06:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Panoptik (talk) 05:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality
Talk:Missouri Republican Party

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox
Talk:Mississippi Republican Party

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox
Talk:Maryland Republican Party

message: It would be good to note that while there are several elected Republicans from the eastern shore, they do not hold the majority of registered voters.  They only hold a slight majority in two E. Shore counties. http://www.elections.state.md.us/pdf/vrar/2008_general_stats.pdf   
Speech used in the article makes it appear as a republican stronghold.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.77.164 (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Republican Party of Louisiana

message: You really can't write about the long decline of the Republican Party in Louisiana without discussing the legal and illegal means used to disenfranchise African Americans, who constituted a majority in many parishes. Get a grip!  This cannot be overlooked or blanked out. Have added content related to this and will add cites.Parkwells (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: How about just accurately covering the START of the party.  There is a long, long void due to to the criminal actions of certain other parties, but is that relevant to an article ON the party? NickAtNight123 (talk) 02:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Restore major events in history

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox 

message: Article on the Republican party of Louisiana starts in on the Democrats in the second paragraph !  Really?
"Threatened by black majorities in several areas and unhappy with the outcome of the war, white insurgents challenged voting by blacks, and elections were increasingly disrupted by violence and fraud in the period of 1868 through the Reconstruction era. Chapters of the White League arose across the state in the 1874 as a white militia that worked for the Democratic Party to achieve the overthrow of the Reconstruction government. Notable extreme events of white violence against blacks in this period were the Colfax Massacre and the Coushatta Massacre. In addition, armed Democratic forces of the White League occupied New Orleans and took over state offices (then located in the city) after the disputed gubernatorial election of 1872." NickAtNight123 (talk) 02:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme Bias 

message: I was searching for the first elected governor of the Republican party of Louisiana after the formation of the Party in 1865.. Instead, all I get is a bunch of CRAP !!!  
What a worthless site !!! NickAtNight123 (talk) 02:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was the First elected Republican Governor after the formation of the party?
Talk:Republican Party of Kentucky

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox