Talk:1 Line (Sound Transit)

message: I removed a sentence that incorrectly claims that there is a merge when entering the downtown tunnel. That merge was removed last March, as the very next sentence indicates. SounderBruce reverted to restore that error(It merges...). Anyone else want to take a look? —Noren (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The fork in the tunnel is still there, albeit blocked off, so it should be mentioned. It would be incorrect to remove the mention of CPS entirely. SounderBruce 03:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge, the line is just for light rail now 

message: The "future plans" section states "During construction related to East Link in early 2020, trains within the downtown transit tunnel are planned to be limited to single-track operations and divided into two lines at Pioneer Square station." I'm not well versed on the subject, but it seems this statement might be outdated per the last paragraph of the "history" section.   ⑉⑉Mccunicano☕️ 00:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to "future plans" section 

message: Hi, I recently added a paragraph explaining the reasoning behind the lack of turnstiles.  However,  reverted that, noting that it belonged on the Link light rail article instead.  While I agree that it would be useful to have there, there isn't an existing section that I can put it in and I haven't done (and don't plan on doing) the research needed to make a more general section on fares for that article.  Furthermore the current article already mentions the lack of turnstiles, and I think it's useful to elaborate.  Also, although the statement should also apply to the Line 2 stations, I don't think it applies to Line T (since it was launched without fares).  IMO the best way to handle it is to include the same/similar paragraphs in both this article and in Link light rail, and the Line 2 article once it has a fares section.  Thoughts? --Pokechu22 (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Redundant content is not the way to go. Since this will apply to the majority of lines and stations going forward, it's better to cover the basic aspects of the system at Link light rail or List of Link light rail stations, with notes on the differences between Lines 1–4 and Line T (the latter of which will use the same POP concept anyway starting in 2022). It's far easier to keep up maintenance of a single section in a single article instead of the same section across four articles. As this article is a featured article, we should be aiming at something more stable. SounderBruce 07:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Won't everything in the current fares paragraph apply to Line 2-4 as well, meaning the section would need to be copied to those articles eventually? --Pokechu22 (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of turnstiles paragraph 

message: With the undiscussed page move, there will need to be some changes made across the system articles. Having  display the line icon and number right next to each other is problematic, so that needs to be fixed; the definitive article needs to be added before most (but not all) mentions of "1 Line"; and there probably is some underlying template somewhere that needs to be fixed up. I'm sure Sound Transit will rename the line again by the time we can update everything. SounderBruce 21:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This page move was discussed ad nauseum (see #changed name). No matter when this change was made, there was gonna be fall out inthe form of lots of changes that need to be made. Sure, that could have been coordinated better. That said, in my opinion, the necessary changes have been made very quickly. I can work on getting that rint changed now. RickyCourtney (talk) 21:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, I know what you mean now, the icon ① and the name "1 Line" are next to each other. As you said, it's "horribly awkward" -- but that's on Sound Transit -- it's not a judgement call for us to make as Wikipedia editors. RickyCourtney (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to splice some code into the module from the NYC Subway equivalent to just use the icon in the services box. Would bypass that issue for the normal lines, but figuring out a solution for the extensions is tricky. SounderBruce 21:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Part of the FA criteria is stability. We don't up and change things without good reason for something that has been assessed to that standard by the community. Please consider that dozens of articles need to be updated with the new name and new links, as well as other templates. A little heads-up would've been appropriate. SounderBruce 23:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Your guidance here seems to be in conflict with WP:BOLD. Pages can be updated incrementally. Brooklynpedestrian (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you insist on rehashing a month-old discussion, perhaps reading WP:FAOWN will help. "It is considerate to discuss significant changes of text or images on the talk page first." This includes the title of the article. SounderBruce 09:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move