lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pop rap (genre)

message: Please add . ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to , very few editors patrol the COI edit request queue and still fewer are admins. Altamel (talk) 04:10, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  .  Also, this talk page is no longer a redirect.  That was making it nearly impossible to handle edit requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested edit
Talk:Peter Churchill

message: This article claims that Peter Churchill and Odette Sansom were divorced in 1955. However, her article claims it was 1956.
Both the infobox and the last sentence of ‘post-war and controversy’ show 1956. Where do you see 1955? MrArmstrong2 (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 1955 or 1956?

message: In the film Odette, a German officer refers to Odette as "a relative of the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill". This was presumably through her marriage to Peter Churchill. But this article makes no such claim. I guess all Churchills are ultimately related, but what was the precise linkage?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 06:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Come to think of it, it may not be a bad idea to mention in the article that he was not related to Winston Churchill but that this was offered to the Nazis to keep him alive.  Coretheapple (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I've added a sentence clarifying that. Oddly, the freely available New York Times obit is not already being used as a source. Coretheapple (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Related to Winston?
Talk:Jean-Paul Sartre/to do

message: *Improve this previous CotW article to featured-standard so that it can be nominated and featured.
* Reference overhaul. Agree on one style (Harvard or modern, either is fine but mixing isn't). 
* Convert appropriate external links to citations instead.
* Find a source before including piece regarding "the Nobel Prize that Sartre tried to get the money later on but that his wish was denied."
* Improve clarity in 'Sartre's Metaphysics'. As it is, this section is overly complex and its terms are not adequately explained.
Sartre relegated his ideas to the notion that simply actions define people, particularly when existence was quite meaningless. "It's always been about being physical," is another way to put it according to Bruce Springsteen. Naturally there is an unmistakeable joy in that we move, now isn't there? Of course there is. Movement is one of the definitions of life, if biology serves us well enough. There is after all a notion deep inside that it is no sin to be glad you are alive.
AbbyNormal26 (talk) 08:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rail transport in India

message: it is nice that we have total lenght of rr today, but it is posible to add total lenghts to another periods ? 1852/1951/1983 ?
2A00:1028:9198:E50E:7051:4F4E:9880:F325 (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  rr lenght up to 1951 ? 

message: Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? 
Yes, I believe the avoidance of Imperial roots to the railway system is a major piece of lacking content, even though the article is purely technical, I intend to add at least a sentence and hyperlink to our article once it is done so that it is at least referenced.
As stated in my answer. I am in a group that intends to create an article on Imperial railway systems that focuses on the history of the Imperial project in India in regards to railway creation.AustinJAragon (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question from the evaluate article exercise that I did poses a good question I wish to share here. 

message: On 30 December 2022, Purple line (3rd line) of Kolkata metro has be inaugurated between joka and tartala. Please update this information in list of metro in INDIA. Bhopinparala (talk) 06:36, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved this section to its dedicated urban rail transit article. Footy2000 (talk) 18:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to edit number no lines of Kolkata Metro 

message: Vande Bharat is a more influential train. There are 51 lines of Vande Bharat while only 2 lines of Amrit Bharat SKAG123 (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing Amrit Bharat with Vande Bharat in the infobox
Talk:Peace of Ryswick

message: Re; Shouldn't this treaty be called the Treaty of Rijswijk? I know of no place called Ryswick in the netherlands, but there is a town called Rijswijk.
I agree 'Rijswijk' is the correct Dutch spelling but the English version is the one commonly used in English-Language articles on the topic.
Robinvp11 (talk) 10:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming Convention
Talk:Devil's coach horse beetle

message: "olens" means "smelling", not "oily" (it is the present participle of Lat. oleo = to smell). Corrected. 142.3.164.195 22:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lacking any professional experience in this area, but willing to try, I'd like to create a taxobox for this insect, something like:
Is there anyone who can check this please?
Billlion 20:16, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxobox

message: I thought we were right to stick with Devil's Coach-horse Beetle. It seems it is controversial Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna)#Capitalization of common names.Even then should not Devil's be captalized as we are talking about The Devil here not a devil. Billlion 2 July 2005 13:11 (UTC)
:Following this discusion  I suggest the title should be Devil's coach-horse beetle, following the convention on capitalization and the hypenation used in the OED. Also just to point out that where it is referred to in the article the "Devil" should be capitalized as above (The Devil).Billlion (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: I would value a link to my poem, which uses some licence and mythological references.
http://soundcloud.com/john_goose/the-devils-coach-horse
John Goss  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.189.52 (talk) 08:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I don't think that would be notable.Billlion (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to The Devil's Coach Horse (poem) 

message: Is the Richard Lewis novel notable enough to mention. It is for sale second hand on Amazon but I wonder how many copies it sold?Billlion (talk) 19:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel

message: I believe to help the flow of the article, you could move the "Description" section towards the top, either before or after etymology. It seems more reasonable to talk about what the beetle looks like before going into more specific topics. MiJiEm (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. If you find a reliable and independent source that has that information, please update the article with that informaiton and cite the source. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:Salusa Secundus

message: Odd to read that Salusa Secundus is the third plant in its system.... Wetman 20:31, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, that's a good point. Also I enjoy responding to discussion posts made two years ago. --24.125.175.229 02:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, me too.90.194.186.31 (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I prefer to give it about 10 years of thought before responding. Best not to rush in to things.Crobar (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This. Is. Hilarious. lol — TAnthonyTalk 14:20, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :User:TAnthony offered a redirect from this article to :Dune prequel series#Legends of Dune with the following rationale: Boldly redirect; not enough here for an individual article, and sources do not really assert notability..
The rationale could be correct, but the target looks clumsy as this article currently evokes other novels than the prequel Legends of Dune and the section where the article redirect to doesn't contain information about Salusa Secundus.
Solution to this issue could be to make this article notable and with content or to redirect to a section explaining what Salusa Secundus is. Such target article should be still identified. --Dereckson (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: for notability, we need references that are not connected with the topic that discuss it in detail. At the moment, all the references seem to be the novels themselves. --Slashme (talk) 12:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't address the concern the section it's redirected to doesn't speak about the notion of the article. --Dereckson (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't recall my exact motovations for choosing this redirect destination but the planet is a setting in the Legends trilogy. In any case, Organizations of the Dune universe#Sardaukar is probably a better choice.— TAnthonyTalk 19:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:List of Irish Quebecers

message: Many sources claim that Robert and Wolfred Nelson were born of an English father. Nothing on the mother though. Some other places talk of them as being of Irish origin. This will need to be clarified.
-- Mathieugp 20:32, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the notice. Humm. I read about their Irish roots, and also about the Irish origins of the surname Nelson (a patronymic name meaning "son of Nell", a form of the Irish name Neal which means "champion"). Even if the father were immediately from England, the family might have close Irish roots because of the name and the various reports on Nelson's Irishness and therefore could be admissible here. I'll welcome input from anyone with information that could help. I personally think for now that it could be kept. ...if the origins cannot be proven here, maybe add a "origins debated" or "disputed", "uncertain" next to the names. --Liberlogos 23:50, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: The Nelsons

message: Sewing graciously brought to my attention the past Progressive Conservative MP Jean-Pierre Blackburn. I also found information on the Irish roots of the Blackburn surname, but no direct mention of a link between the man in question and such ancestry. I feel confirmation could be useful and wise before adding him to the list. Can anyone provide more information?
Additionally, while we are on the subject of Quebecois origins, does anyone know more about the roots of the Turps, for Parti Québécois MP and past Bloc Québécois star representative Daniel Turp? And for the Seymours of Quebec sovereigntist intellectual Michel Seymour? About Mr. Seymour, I have heard himself say that he has an ancestor born in the United States of America (within or around Washington D.C., I believe), but I do not know where the parents of this ancestor came from (probably England). --Liberlogos 00:45, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Furthermore

message: # Isn't Paul Martin a Franco-Ontarian?
# Is Joe Beef a real person?
-- Mathieugp 12:34, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Two questions

message: I think Jennifer Finnigan, the actress, has the background and prominence to qualify for this list.
Cranston Lamont 22:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jennifer Finnigan

message: They're called Quebecois.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.161.18 (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a 'Quebecer'?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Nation pages

message: I think we should also mention the team's current head coach. Andris 20:36, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)
:Head coaches vary. For example (Canada), Pat Quinn is the World Cup/ Olympics coach but the World Championships coach was someone else. Earl Andrew 03:24, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Head coach

message: Why are they listed here as "Canadian... hockey team" and "American... hockey team" but on the actual pages it's "Canada... hockey team" and "United States... hockey team"?  It makes sense to have the latter since it's an adjective... Schmloof (talk) 22:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because the pages all went through a request for move awhile back and were moved to the current name. This list was written when they were named the same and probably forgotten about when the articles were renamed. -Djsasso (talk) 14:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention
Talk:Salamander

message: shed from most other endemic salamander species simply by their size, hellbenders average up to 60 cm or about 2 ft in length; the only species requiring further distinction (due to an overlap in distribution and size range) is the common mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus).[13][11] This demarcation can be made by noting the presence of external gills in the mudpuppy, which are lacking in the hellbender, as well as the presence of four toes on each hind foot of the mudpuppy (in contrast with the hellbender's five).[4] Furthermore, the average size of C. a. alleganiensis has been reported to be 45–60 cm (with some reported as reaching up to 74 cm or 30 in), while N. m. maculosus has a reported average size of 28–40 cm in length, which means that hellbender adults will still generally be notably larger than even the biggest mudpuppies.[13][14][5]
Taxonomy[edit]
The small eyes and loose skin are characteristic of hellbenders
The genus Cryptobranchus has historically only been considered to contain one species, C. alleganiensis, with two subspecies, C. a. alleganiensis and C. a. bishopi.[11] A recent decline in population size of the Ozark subspecies C. a. bishopi has led to further research into populations of this subspecies, including genetic analysis to determine the best method for conservation.[13] Crowhurst et al., for instance, found that the "Ozark subspecies" denomination is insufficient for describing genetic (and therefore evolutionary) divergence within the Cryptobranchus genus in the Ozark region. They found three equally divergent genetic units within the genus: C. a. alleganiensis, and two distinct eastern and western populations of C. a. bishopi. These three groups were shown to be isolated, and are considered to most likely be "diverging on different evolutionary paths".[13]
Distribution[edit]
Hellbenders are present in a number of Eastern US states, from southern New York to northern Georgia,[15] including parts of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.202.102 (talk) 13:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laysan

message: I note that Reef has a link to the currently nonexistent article Fringing reef.  When that gets written, this article should probably link to there instead of to Reef.  For now, linking to Reef is the most informative option. —Triskaideka 20:44, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Reef

message: I'm afraid that this article isn't close to GA yet. 
#The introduction does not come close to summarising the article
#Much is unreferenced, including most of the geology section
#References  are a mess. Is Sinclair a ref or external link? - shouldn't be both Why are there footnote links in the reference section instead of incorporating the url? footnoteplacement in text doesn't always follow punctuation
#lack of clarity - Species section claims two mammals and a few birds - presumably no invertebrates, plants or bacteria?
#birds just a list -  which breed and which are visitors?
#whole Ancient Hawaiian section is based on a newspaper article, needs a proper ref
#images, although good, correctly licensed and appropriate, are just dumped in a line. Try to integrate with appropriate sections, reducing size if necessary, 
#article title shouldn't appear in headings (MOS)
#coordinates just an afterthought, why not integrate with the maps
#plenty of copy editing to do eg Pritchardia should be italicised, geology gives only imperial measurements
Sorry if this seems pretty negative, but there's a lot to be done. let me know if there's anything above that's unclear. Jimfbleak (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure thing. I was mainly interested in finding out exactly what the article did need for GA, so thank you. SeanMD80talk | contribs 01:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: The article takes an apologist's attitude toward Max Schlemmer, whose actions single-handedly caused the extinction of many native species of plants and birds. This is a problem of neutrality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.188.137 (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Max Schlemmer

message: Quote, "A U.S. Geological Survey study found that Laysan, Midway Atoll, and Pacific islands like them could become inundated and unfit to live on during this century.[2][3]" 
Inundated with what? This is likely to confuse the average person. TonyMorris68 (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inundated with what?
Talk:Church Hill, Richmond, Virginia

message: All this material is at Richmond, Virginia, its natural context. Delete? Wetman 20:54, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Arlo Guthrie

message: He is the fifth, and oldest surviving, of Woody Guthrie's eight children; two older half-sisters died of Huntington's disease (of which Woody also died in 1967), an older half-brother died in a train accident, another half sister died in a car accident, and a fourth sister died in childhood.
The way this is phrased seems to suggest he's either the 6th oldest (2 sisters, 1 brother, 3rd sister, 4th sister), or, one of his younger siblings passed away and it's unclear that it was a younger sibling.
Not sure which is correct, but either way the math doesn't add up as it's currently written. Pennstatephil (talk) 19:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math on siblings doesn't add up
Talk:Ébauche

message: Here's an excellent example of how breaking down natural categories results in meaningless fragments, or ebauches in the more general sense. Why has this been relieved of its context? Wetman 21:32, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These other elements would make very small stub articles, and would reduce this main article significantly as well. Since there has been no discussion on the talk pages regarding this proposed split, I am removing the tag from the article page. However, feel free to discuss and re-add as necessary. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split to new articles
Talk:Scarabaeidae

message: Should Scarab be merged into this article? –Hajor 21:34, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. A very long beetle article might justify a separate article on the mythology, but we're nowhere close to that yet. Stan 00:33, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: "Dung beetle" should not be merged (or redirected) into the "Scarab beetle". the cultural significance of the dung beetle alone calls for an independent entry. if no one here objects, i will venture to separate the dung beetle part from the current article. btw, the article is rather messy now. :( --K.C. Tang 00:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Was there talk of merging the two?  Maybe I haven't followed the discussion closely enough, but I agree that they should be and stay separate. dewet|™ 08:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  separate articles 

message: Am I the only one seeing the Taxonomy box merging with the Gallery?  Is this just my browser? Jasonaltenburg (talk) 06:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery/Taxobox display

message: How should one access Falsignambia from this article? Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falsignambia 

message: Why should there be ext. links to pages on individual types of beetle in an article on a group? I suggest we remove all such links (they can go on individual genus/species pages if useful). Chiswick Chap (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: (Far) Too Many External Links: a Proposal

message: A search for 'chafer beetle' redirects to this page, rather than to the page for the European chafer beetle.  This makes the reader think there is no specific information about chafer beetles.  Can someone fix the redirect?  (I don't know how.)Rosieredfield (talk) 04:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Chafer Beetle? 

message: Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me can address the issue of flying wrt Scarabs. Can they all fly? Why is this issue not addressed in the article? Gouveia2 (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the overwhelming majority can fly, the insignificant fraction that do NOT fly will only be mentioned in the appropriate articles for those flightless lineages. For an example, see Rain beetle. Dyanega (talk) 00:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do all Scarabs fly? 

message: IRMNG says that Euchiridae Hope, 1840 is a synonym of this family. Could anyone solve this red link?--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It should redirect to Euchirinae. Dyanega (talk) 22:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   Euchiridae as a synonym?
Talk:Even Stevens

message: Since this musical episode is arguably the most memorable episode of this series, it got me wondering if there were any other shows to do a musical episode or episodes?
WAVY 10 22:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that it's pilot was produced like two years before the show was picked up, or something of that Nature. WookMuff 08:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influenza: The Musical 

message: The article infobox lists the run date as 31 February. This must be a mistake, so I have changed it to what was in the body of the text. If this is incorrect, feel free to correct it. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange dates

message: The article claims that the entire show takes place during one school year, but by my recollection, that's not true.  In the third season, the characters seem to have moved up a grade.  I can't cite episode numbers off-hand (though I'm happy to consult IMDb for them if no one else recalls), but here are some cases in point-- the episode where Ren tries out for the flag squad, Louis and Tom Gribalski are both inside the bathroom marked "EIGHTH GRADE BOYS ONLY."  Also, in the episode where Tawny tries out for the school of the arts, Ren mentions that the try-outs are "only for seventh- and eighth-graders"-- conclusion: she is in the ninth grade.  That's all I can think of off the top of my head, but at any rate, I think that should demonstrate that the show in fact takes place over TWO school years, not one. Chalkieperfect (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of the show 

message: In the entry on Tawny where her clothing style's discussed this is included: "Tawny's dress is often confused to be that of a neo-Nazi. It is not known if this was the intention of the writers, but it has been noted that one specific writer was once seen speaking at a Nazi rally in 2005. Most critics of the show believe that this is the most significant detraction of the show. No legal action has been taken as of yet."
I can't find any references to this, and it's unsourced.  Seems like a serious allegation of that nature would show up.  Any references? SLEPhoto (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring characters