lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brookstone

message: I added this sub-chapter. But, the controversy section now takes up around half of the article from this sub-chapter addition. I have found other info on Brookstone to add to the pre-chapters section (top) that will lengthen the article and reduce the dominance of the controversy section. I will add this content as soon as I can gather it up and effectively add it to the article. Opinions? Merry x-mas, Wikipedians. 2010 is coming! NoFlyingCars (talk) 10:04, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is incredibly unimportant and unencyclopedic.  Wikipedia should not be a place where every single PETA complaint is entered and documented.  I suggest a vote for removal.  Further the AOL links for the Peter Vidala article are no longer working. 141.54.138.170 (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frog-o-sphere 

message: TOM VIA 
President & Chief Executive Officer
Tom Via has been the Chief Executive Officer and President of Brookstone Inc. since December 1, 2014. Prior to Brookstone, Mr. Via spent 12 years at Toys“R”Us, most recently as its Senior Vice President for Babies“R”Us in the U.S., where he was responsible for leading the company’s juvenile product growth strategy and served on the Global Commercial Committee. From 2010 to 2013 he was Managing Director (President) of Toys“R”Us, Australia, where he was the senior executive responsible for all operations and business activities for the company’s Toys“R”Us and Babies“R”Us brands. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President, Toys“R”Us, Canada, where he was responsible for leading all Merchandising, Marketing, Ecommerce and Store Planning activities for the Canada division. Mr. Via helped direct the expansion of the Toys“R”Us and Babies“R”Us integrated store format in Canada, as well as the launch of Toysrus.ca. Prior to joining Toys“R”Us, Mr. Via held merchandising positions at Wal-Mart (Canada), Payless ShoeSource, Kmart, Hills Department Stores, Fishers Big Wheel Stores, Gold Circle Stores and Adam, Meldrum and Anderson Department Stores. Mr. Via is a graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo with a degree in Business Administration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.146.130 (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Via
Talk:Master/slave (BDSM)/Archive 1

message: Agree - This article should include that of slave training. The educational process of anyone willing to learn about this subject is a long labor intesive trek. Inclusion would enhance that journey. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IDCrewDawg (talk • contribs) 2006-03-12T17:46:36  (UTC)
Agree - I don't think additional information would damage anyone. Anything that could grant a better overwiev of the subject seems proper to include. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.242.132.173 (talk • contribs) 2006-06-09T12:36:53  (UTC)
Agree - They both really fall under the same thing.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DDMrulz (talk • contribs) 2006-07-22T21:50:28  (UTC) 
Agree - too similar to warrant separate articles — SkydiveMike 21:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Just a simple copy/paste for now. Mdwh 22:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sev (band)

message: Should this be SEV or Sev? -- Francs2000  21:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The band has gone by either in their print. So it can be both. -- vi 21:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is most commonly used?  Just thinking about which should be the article, and which the redirect or disambig page? -- Francs2000  22:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most common then I suppose would be Sev, so redirects can be sent to this current page. -- vi 22:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just turned SEV into a disambig page then. -- Francs2000  22:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! -- vi 22:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: If you choose to edit this page, please explain if you delete or add something. The discography was removed and I reverted it because there was no explanation as to why the user chose to remove it. It seemed fine to me to keep, as I modeled it off other band pages. -- vi 02:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: It's not good Wikipedia practice to write an article about yourself.  This is clearly written by the band, since it even uses the pronoun "our" in describing band activity. -- MyWikiBiz 17:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this.  Although the band is notable according to WP:MUSIC (I can verify that they at least have been on a national tour because I saw them in Phoenix) it looks like a fan asked a band member to write a bio for Wikipedia, or maybe a band member asked a fan to place it here.  They need an article, but should be edited for POV issues. Aguerriero (ţ) (ć) (ë) 19:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with both of you as I wrote this, however you both could have asked me about this instead of speculations. The band did not ask me to write this. I borrowed information from several sites in order to start their article. I have been meaning to return to this with my own edits, but have been majorly swamped. Thanks for bringing this back to my front burner. I will fix it ASAP. vi 16:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I speculate for a living - nasty habit. Anyway, good job on the edits thus far.  I am a big fan of the band, which is why I checked out the article to begin with. Aguerriero (ţ) (ć) (ë) 17:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But your nasty habit actually got me on the ball on the eve of my vacation to fix this article. I am thankful for your efforts! vi 21:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vanity
Talk:Original Keetoowah Society

message: All usage of second person, statements about who may edit the article, etc. need to be removed and cleaned up.  Article also need better citiation and POV cleanup.  Waya sahoni 21:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of Second person 

message: Excellent progress is being made on the Red Hat Duke article.   Cleanup tag removed. Waya sahoni 22:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blueotter is making excellent progress 

message: Changed based on information provided by blueotter. Waya sahoni 23:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name changed to John Red Hat Duke 

message: cleanup of links, citiations, and sources needed.  Article also needs to be wikified. Waya sahoni 23:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please cleanup article 

message: Completed. Waya sahoni 01:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleaned up and wikified 

message: There is so much duplication between this article and that on the Keetoowah Nighthawk Society that it is very confusing to try to discern where one ends and the other begins. As this is the current society, it should not duplicate all the history of the society formed in the nineteenth century, including cut-and-paste sections from the other article. It's questionable whether there is sufficient content on this society to stand alone as a separate, notable article. Sources other than the tribal website should be added.Parkwells (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication and confusion

message: This note was added to the "Origin of name" section by a logged-out user who has been blocked and topic-banned for over-flagging articles for cleanup:  Actually, manataka.org is notorious for copyright violations, posting people's work without permission and refusing to take it down, along with posting accurate info via copyvio right next to wild fabrications about Native cultures written by those clearly unfamiliar with Native cultures. So, it's probable the manataka page is the copyvio. It is not an "American Indian Council", despite what they say on their pages. It should be considered the same as a personal blog or personal website and, worse, one known for copyvios, unsourced essays and inaccurate content. I actually came across this while cleaning up the well-meaning but unusable cites to manataka on WP, along with links to the site that look to be linkspam. Proceeding now with long-overdue cleanup. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple levels of weirdness. Cleanup
Talk:Shoulder joint

message: I've just added a table describing the movements in the joint.  It is long and some might argue it should be moved to a separate page.  However, as long as the article is a stub it makes sense to me to have it in the article.  Personally, I'd prefer to see the section in question further developed in order to make the table redundant.
 / Raven in Orbit (Talk | contribs) 19:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the table of movements, it may be a good idea to explicitly indicate which angle is stated in the parentheses. Since the glenohumeral joint has three axes of movement and also three degrees of freedom, three angles are needed to describe the position of the joint. However, only one angle is stated for each table entry. To me, the lay reader, it is not apparent which angle is being indicated in the table. 176.199.172.94 (talk) 14:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

text: In addition to not knowing which axes the angles are referring to, I lack some other pieces of information to comprehend the table: How are the angles defined (where's the zero point)? What do the angles even indicate? The range in which movement is possible? (I.e. is flexion only possible in a range from 150° to 170°?) Or is it indicating the range of angles in which the table entry is valid? In that case, what about the remaining range? (I.e. what about flexion at below 150° and above 180°?) 176.199.172.94 (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of movements 

message: Somebody might want to add a link to the Facebook topic of Shoulder arthritis.  
Also, this topic itself needs to be expanded.   Dr.Bastedo (talk) 17:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthritis 

message: I find it odd that the term "humeral retroversion" turns up nothing at all, when I search for this topic on Wikipedia. I am interested in the viewpoint that the range of shoulder motion, particularly "retroversion," is very significantly different in modern humans than it was in Neanderthals, and that this difference prevented Neanderthals from overhand throwing, and possibly from effective use of bow and arrow technology.  The research literature on this issue is written in language so technical that it is virtually uninformative to me. (See https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274902225_Humeral_torsion_and_throwing_proficiency_in_early_human_evolution.)  
Even though this is obviously a very good article, and despite the fact that I have a pretty decent grasp of medical terminology, I do not find it very helpful.  
Some of the animated diagrams in the current article are extremely good, and I have never seen anything like them in other sources.  Would the editors active on this page please add discussion and imagery relevant to this feature of the human shoulder?  A comparison with the Neanderthal shoulder would undoubtedly be interesting to many readers, and would be extremely interesting for me. It would also make a valuable addition to the page on Neanderthals. Janice Vian, Ph.D. (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humeral Retroversion
Talk:Gresham Professor of Commerce

message: I would like to suggest that it be added that Raghavendra Rau has been the Gresham Professor of Business at Gresham College since his appointment in 2022. He is listed on his profile page that he is Gresham Professor of Business but not on this page.
I would like to disclose that I work for Gresham College and so I am suggesting this as an edit. Commsgresh (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raghavendra Rau is Gresham Professor of Business
Talk:Strafexpedition (World War I)

message: Totally untrue. The Italian First Army was backed by the Fifth Army and did not suffer such a crushing defeat as it seems in this stub.
I'm actually writing a complete article on Italian-language Wikipedia about the Battle of Asiago (or Battle of the Uplands, as it was called by Italian historians). I'll surely translate it, if somebody's ready to fix my edits into correct written English. it:Utente:Lohe
:I slightly edited the page, which was in fact inaccurate.
:A more comprehensive information on this battle would be useful.
:Looking forward to it Giordaano 10:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done, Giordaano. I'll start translating my article within two weeks. It'll need serious grammar and lexicon fixing, but I'm sure English speakers won't feel too much annoying to give me a hand. Thanks for now. it:Utente:Lohe
A photo of the monument at Asiago woulod be good here Lumberjack Steve 09:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Don Pacifico affair

message: How was he Portugese, if he was born in GIbraltar, and able to claim Britsh citizenship?  Without explanation of it that word should perhaps be lost from teh first sentence?  Midgley 22:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He had been (according to Palmerston's speech) Portugese consul in a couple of places, presumably he was born there. Stroika 06:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pacifico as Portugese

message: This 'incident' is not and has never been known as the 'Pacifico incident'. It was and is known as the Don Pacifico Affair. See, for example, David Hannell's article in European History Quarterly, 1989.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.14.198 (talk) 18:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this page! 

message: than what?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.92.232 (talk) 03:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  a more likely alternative 

message: This section could use some expansion to clarify the meaning of the information. What is the Cortes - it is not mentioned elsewhere on the page - and why is a petition addressed by Pacifico to it in 1839 relevant when the dispute was in 1847? What was the exchange rate, that is, how did 120000 drachmas compare to £500 (or the requested £21295) at the time? Is/was the settlement amount considered reasonable by observers? 98.116.118.68 (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity on Pacifico's settlement
Talk:Homo Sovieticus

message: Homo Sovieticus was not aggressive? 
...surprisingly, over the next 20 years Homo sovieticus (an artificial construct of doublethink, paternalism, suspicion and isolationism) had mutated and reproduced, acquiring, along the way, new characteristics such as cynicism and aggression.
Homo Sovieticus was not aggressive before 1991? What are the residents of the Baltic States to think of this? Or of Chechnya? Or for that matter the residents of Budapest in 1956? This suggestion of Homo Sovieticus being meek, tame and apparently wholly benign before 1991 is rather subjective or only partially accurate, and probably does not belong in an encylopaedia.
How about: " ...surprisingly, over the next 20 years Homo sovieticus (an artificial construct of doublethink, paternalism, suspicion and isolationism) had mutated and reproduced, acquiring, along the way, new characteristics such as cynicism, and also becoming more aggressive." 
90.191.147.226 (talk) 12:17, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chibi Vampire

message: Shouldn't there be a list of the anime episodes? 24.117.202.2 (talk) 04:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there should, but hasn't been started yet. Probably will be once Funimation starts releasing the series. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode List

message: DVD complete Mania.com CBB Airmail vol. ANN Right Turn Only Airmail vol. ANN Airmail vol. ANN Bites vol. 
--KrebMarkt 06:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: # 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
This should be split off into a new article (table made) due to the number of episodes. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode list
Talk:Mereology

message: Hi,
# I have archived the talk page up to now, because all discussions were 6 years old or older.
# I have fixed the lead section of the article, as was requested by a maintenance template that I removed.
# I have created a Glossary of mereology, which should help readers of this article and researchers working on it.
Thiagovscoelho (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive, lead section, glossary
Talk:List of members of the Tokyo Stock Exchange

message: Angr/talk 22:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Peripheral drift illusion

message: Images too small?
:Looking ok to me, illusion working correctly for me. --OscarTheCattalk 22:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The third blue/green blanket image is too small to show the effects in the article. Clicking on it for the full image does work correctly. Perhaps a zoomed portion of it could be shown in the article? DMahalko (talk) 04:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I know one person who is not able to see any rotation in these types of illusions.  We are curious what it is about her visual processing that is different?  Any clues appreciated!
24.2.193.240 03:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannot see rotation? 

message: A much better image can be seen on , although I believe it's too big to be put here.
82.18.180.58 23:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Better image

message: I don't see rotating either. Then again, I'm very different than other people. I can't process visual info as quickly as others do. I'm very ill (painful fibromyalgic muscles) + chemical sensitive & photosensitive. 
I get terrible headaches from fluoresence & from bright lights.
I found this page due to browsing James Nestor's website re: his book Get High Now.
None of Nestor's visuals worked on me, frankly.
Anyway, as much as Nestor thinks he's being scientific, he's forgetting a major point: And that's, that the actual reason some people may get dizzy, is due to the strong EMFs of computer fluoresence, rather than directly due to the images themselves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.203.40.251 (talk) 21:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Nestor's book describes this - but it does NOT work for me either
Talk:Girl on the Bridge

message: The English release of the movie was apparently "Girl on the bridge", not "The girl on the bridge".
How can we correct the title of this article? 68.227.208.105 (talk) 03:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. I'm surprised this hasn't been done yet, so I've just done it. -- Brangifer (talk) 04:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper English Title 

message: I have added Mylène Farmer as Irene, since at 34 min. into the film she appears for a reasonably long sequence and Daniel Auteuil addresses her as "Irene". She also appears several very brief times at 38 - 39 min.. If I'm wrong, then Catherine Lascault is her twin! -- Brangifer (talk) 00:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mylène Farmer as Irene 

message: This article needs a "reception" section since it has been extremely well-received, with many nominations and some awards for the film and its actors. Here's a list. -- Brangifer (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 
Talk:Jesús Rollán

message: It seems speculation whether his death was a suicide, so I've removed the category link and changed the paragraph -- including a cite to a news source about his death. If anything else comes up in the media referencing a suicide, I would not be against adding that sourced reference back into the article. Sue Anne 22:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide vs. Accidental Fall
Talk:East Saginaw, Michigan

message: There is no mention of the Baille brothers who invented the Black Cat slot machine, and who alledgedly came from East Saginaw. I assume there must be more information available at the local city archives, so if anyone from East Saginaw would like to post some information about them, that would be great. I mean, there is a German article about the Caille Brothers, but not on the English wiki, and that's just sad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:7E8:C086:5701:30D7:B741:85E1:72E1 (talk) 10:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caille Brothers
Talk:Northern Cape

message: The Xhosa name for the Northern Cape can't be Mpuma-Koloni. Mpuma is short for Mpumalanga which means East in Xhosa and Zulu (hence the name of the province Mpumalanga) and Mpuma-Koloni therefore means Eastern Cape. Joziboy 12 March 2006, 22:53 (UTC)
:The revious remark is quite correct,
:I have a huge disagreement regarding the perpetuation of 'apartheid racial classifications' such as 'coloured'. This term was used to include the Koi people into a convenient 'classification' to bolster apartheid, possibly to undermine the origional inhabitants of the 'Northern Cape'. I do not have a real problem with the concept of 'apartheid', merely the beaurocratic manner in which it was implemented. Apartheid, according to Pik Botha (quite correctly), former Nationalist Foreign Minister of South Africa, subsists globally and can found in the preference of national and cultural groups to associate with their own kind. Regrettably the internatiional 'intelectual' community are, for conformist reasons, petrified to entertain discourser on such matters. This is characterised by the outcry by activists against Sed Blatter's conciliatory attempt to defuse the ratial behaviour of players; the outcry was vastly disproportionate to both the essence and the contents of Blatter's response!
:The Northern Cape Province is clearly the domaine of the Koi people in the federal order, implemented by the ruling ANC, as much as the eastern Cape is the natural domain of the Xosa! Remarkable deviation rom Marxist philosophy, towards the acceptance of the former opposition United Party's apartheid manifesto.
:In fact, rationally, the Xosa are in the process of colonising the Wastern and Northern Cape provinces by way of economically motivated migration; it is a real pity that they can not do justice the resources of their native province! Jim Wichstrom, jimwi@telkomsa.net, 24 Dec 2011, (University of Life). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfjiwi (talk • contribs) 09:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mpuma?

message: 70% of the population in Northern Cape speaks Afrikaans (including 90% in Kimberly)....so why that discrimination against the Afrikaan language.
It looks like Quebec before the 1960s when French was discriminated.
Western and Northern Cape should unify in a common state with Afrikaans as the official language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.24.243.144 (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What does any of your comments have to do with the structure or content of this article? Roger (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the NC Provincial Government page is only in English? 

message: The information in the "Demographics" section does not match that of the infobox at the top of the article. 108.254.160.23 (talk) 16:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Rancho Cucamonga High School

message: " Rancho Cucamonga High School opened in August of 1992 with an enrollment of approximately 15,000 ninth to eleventh grade students." That sounds really dubious.  Can we get a source on that? - Randalllin (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 15000 students?

message: Lists of names in this article should be sourced in accordance with WP:BLP. As there is no way of constantly maintaining linked articles, this applies to names which have a Wikipedia article as well as those that do not. Any name listed with no verifiable citations should be removed. Refer to WP:NLIST for guidance. Fæ (talk) 06:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of names