lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Seven Pines

message: Most books refer to the battle as what is written above, because the battle was really two, one at Fair oaks, the other at seven pines.  Also each side gave it a different name so it is a compromise.
:Hm.  The Library of Congress subject heading "Seven Pines, Battle of, Va., 1862" redirects to "Fair Oaks, Battle of, Va., 1862." so shouldn't the title of this article be "Battle of Fair Oaks" ?
: The Library of Congress generally deals with names of books and images and does not play any definitive role in establishing how things are named. We are using the name acknowledged by the [| American Battlefield Protection Program], the effort by the National Park Service to classify battles and battlefields. To address the first question in this section, which I think is about five years old, yes, there were combat activities taking place in two separate locations, about a mile apart, but they are not considered two separate battles, any more than parts of the battle of Gettysburg are considered separate. The reason the two names are being bandied about here is that the Federal and Confederate soldiers tended to refer to the part of the battle they liked best. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition to the justification listed in the previous paragraph, note that in Wikipedia I do not believe there is any example of a Civil War battle that includes all of the multiple name choices in the title of the article. According to the NPS, the primary name for this battle is Seven Pines, but it is also known as Fair Oaks and Fair Oaks Station. We only acknowledge the first in the title. People referring to this article are free to use a link such as "Battle of Seven Pines (Fair Oaks)" if they want to use both names. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of the outcome, these multiple attempts to move away from the name Battle of Seven Pines demonstrate the move to be controversial. Controversial moves should be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves for further discussion. BusterD (talk) 10:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Battle of Fair Oaks/Seven Pines 

message: I moved the Currier and Ives lithograph out of the infobox and replaced with the Waud engraving, which seems more authentic to me, especially since Waud was an eyewitness.Mtsmallwood (talk) 04:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swap of images 

message: Today a new editor twice blanked the sentence about McClellan being down with malaria during the event. The sentence was cited with Eicher, normally regarded as an authoritative source meeting RS standards for citation. If User:Wesn54 wants to make a case for "Bailey's history book" as an alternative or minority source this is the place to discuss it. On the merits, I have no opinion. BusterD (talk) 14:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for McClellan malaria
Talk:Battle of Waynesboro, Virginia

message: A Geographical Note to Editors: I do not know what source it is that so frequently and grievously confuses the river system of the Shenandoah Valley, but whatever its source, it is annoyingly incorrect.  There is no "Shenandoah River" in the immediate vicinity of Staunton or Waynesboro, though both of those areas drain into the Shenandoah eventually.   The Augusta County area of the Valley is drained by three tributaries of the South Fork Shenandoah: The Middle River flows into the North River, which in turn meets the South River at Port Republic to form the South Fork Shenandoah.  Calling the South River the "South Fork" places the site of this battle some thirty miles from its actual location, on top of a completely different battlefield fought at a different time.  This error and similar ones have been repeated across all battles fought in the Upper Valley, so please be aware of it and seek to avoid it in the future.  
The geography of Virginia doesn't help; the "South River" named in this article has its headwaters only a few hundred yards from another "South River" which actually does flow south into the Maury River, which used to be named the North River, which is a tributary of the James River.
Also, if someone would name the erroneous source which forms the basis of the articles on the Battles of Waynesboro, Piedmont, Port Republic, and Cross Keys, please note it here so that we may better identify how to avoid the reintroduction of these errors. Sofa King (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography of the area
Talk:Sliding Doors

message: His wiki article says this film is based on one one his stories. Which? 76.102.148.112 (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunsany

message: The movie's core idea shows great resemblance to Krzysztof Kieślowski's Blind Chance. In Blind Chance there are three alternative scenarios that are possible outcomes of a single event - man chasing after a train. In one he catches a train, in other he doesn't and also have to suffer the consequences of violently smashing into another man while running and in third he doesn't catch the train and almost smashes into a man but stops to apologise. I've never read anything about Sliding Doors being inspired by another movie, but Kieślowski isn't exactly an unknown director, and Blind Chance was screened at Cannes in 1987, so I think it's quite possible. But I'm not sure how should I put it if I don't have any confirmation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.1.71.21 (talk) 22:26, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: the concept was explored earlier by J. B. Priestley in his 1932 play Dangerous Corner. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 06:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We'd need a reliable source to make that connection before we could add it to the article. DonIago (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible inspiration

message: There's some confusion about the plot of the first scenario and the plot of the second. I'd like to correct, but my English isn't perfect...I hope that someone will do the job!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.51.44.247 (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She says her Great grandfather worked on it. This could mean he was a Tea boy.filceolaire (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I'm sorry to ask (maybe there's something I didn't catch), but how do you know which story is "real" and which one is "alternate"? For me both seem to be "real", just one of them doesn't end well.
Is there some comment from the producers or the script writer?
Thank you for the attention! --Ivan Linares (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current / Alternate
Talk:Battle of White Oak Road

message: You say 'Lee shifted reinforcements to meet the Federal movement to turn his right flank...', and I note that this comes from the Civil War Trust website. But the map confirms that it was Lee's left flank that they wanted to turn, to prevent him from heading South. Valetude (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Lee's men were facing east and south, so his right flank was on the western end of the line, which was the end that Grant was trying to turn. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right flank?
Talk:Battle of Williamsburg

message: Longstreet succeeded in his task of cover Johnston’s retreat to Richmond. While this may be a tactical victory on the Unions side they weren’t able to break through and disrupt the Department of Northern Virginia’s withdraws allowing Johnston’s entire force to pull back to Richmond, allowing for a overall strategic Confederate victory. 24.112.120.144 (talk) 05:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategic Confederate Victory 

message: I can add info on this battle and pictures if wanted.The rifle pits from both sides is suppose to be the best untouched trenches of this war anywhere.Newport News park.Involved Vermont 3rd infantry where they were massacred almost in a retreat from confederate counter attack. 2600:8805:814:AD00:11C5:BE06:60A9:1ADE (talk) 23:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Dam no.1
Talk:First Battle of Winchester

message: The text of this article is virtually verbatim from the public domain NPS source cited in the References, which is a problem according to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches. I have added the appropriate citations, but a general rewrite is in order. I will put this on my to do list, but other assistance in solicited in the meantime. Hal Jespersen (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article source 
Talk:Wilde (film)

message: Although Oscar Wilde was gay, I see no link between this article and the interests expressed in the phrase "which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia". The article on the movie is not a LGBT-related issue! The article on Oscar Wilde biography maybe. Don't mix the movie as a work of art with the persona as a human being.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.216.236.74 (talk) 14:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: Why does the article state that the film is based on "biographical notes" by Richard Ellman, when it was based on the full biography published by Ellman?
The film was originally supposed to be based on Ellman's biography but the filming ran into trouble with the Wilde estate as the film was sensationalising a lot of Wilde's life. The film as a whole is amazingly shoddy and actually inlcudes only the most superficial parts of wilde's works because once the wilde estate discovered what the film was doing, they withdrew support..  A very badly done film that has unfortunately been sold to the masses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.21.156 (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Not pertinent to the article, I know, but I'm curious to know if it's been premièred on UK television yet. I find myself rather surprised that I've not yet seen the film, despite it having been released more than a decade ago. --Rebroad (talk) 11:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has Wilde been premièred on UK television?
Category talk:Boy Scouts of America

message: Some articles are not listed in alphbetical order. For example:  Tiger (Boy Scouts of America), Bobcat (Boy Scouts of America), and Wolf (Boy Scouts of America) are all listed under "C". Why is this? --Jagz 22:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because some knucklehead listed their cat line as "Cub 1/2/3" etc in the article. Why is beyong me.  I'll change them.Rlevse 23:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Philippi (1861)

message: On balance, I think the title of this page ought to be 'Battle of Philippi (Virginia)', since the area formed part of Virginia at the time of the battle. But it seems the title can't be altered via the edit-page. Valetude (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: Can't access the NPS Battle Summary for details of the casualties. Presumably the dead Union men were the first to die in action in the Civil War. Are their names known? Valetude (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the record-books 
Talk:Battle of Shepherdstown

message: I see no problem with Confederate fatalities.
First, no mention is made of fatalities, but of casualties (killed, wounded, missing). Second the article then mentions that the total casualties of both sides is under 700, which adds up. 
Vtsaogames (talk) 20:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

message: Many Civil War battlefield articles have a dedicated section regarding today's status of the battlefield. Whether it's interpreted, protected, signed, re-enacted, whatever. That would be a nice addition to this page. (I'd add it myself if I knew!)
Dave (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battlefield Today 

message: While withdrawing back to the ford Hill's men attacked under a withering hail of federal artillery fire…
:Are Hill’s confederates withdrawing to the Virginia end of the ford or the Maryland end? The events of this battle take place on both sides of the river, and the article fails to keep us in the picture by stating which side of the river we’re on. Valetude (talk) 22:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify, please
Talk:Heribert of Cologne

message: "Duke Hugo of Worms" is copied from Catholic Encyclopedia. Such a ducal title, ca 970, sounds bogus: Worms was governed by its bishops: Burchard of Worms was a contemporary. A count palatinate, seated in the Carolingian palace perhaps: Damals war es, als der schöne Graf von Worms mit seinen Mannen...(Joseph Christian Freiherr von Zedlitz, Poems 1859). A Graf, then, not a duke. Anyone with better information? --Wetman 00:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His feast day is celebrated on 16 March, his private feast day on 12 October.
What is a "private feast day"? I've never heard of such. ForDorothy (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no answer.  I've never heard of such a thing.  138.162.128.54 (talk) 12:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

text: The Catholic Church knows of no such thing as a "private feast day", although sometimes the universal Church commemorates a saint on one day and the order to which the saint belonged on another. Since there's been no answer to this question for five years, I've removed the reference. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "private feast day"?
Talk:Aditya Birla Group

message: Hey, @Putinstalin, why are you adding this article which was moved to draft? Valereee (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But everything is right about the page then why are you moving it to draft every time? Putinstalin (talk) 18:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the article you created has zero sources. Valereee (talk) 19:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essen
Talk:Theory of computation

message: This is a discussion that is becoming increasingly popular: Can computation as it is defined act as an adequate model of the way an organic neurological system behaves? In other words does the theory of computation give us any further understanding of the mind?  This is a topic of both philosophy and computer science/AI.  My feelings on this matter are that our understanding of the function of machines is misleading, often the way it is perceived that a computer works is actually far from the reality of what the machine is doing.  This is similar to the problems of introspective thinking that led to ideas like Cartesian Dualism.  So, can we (as intelligent animals) be described in terms of symbol manipulation and finite state machines?  I’m not so convinced, but at the same time I don’t completely reject the notion.  Katateochi 09:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computation as a explanation of the mind 

message: The use of the term regular expression in this article is misleading, as regular expressions in Unix tools and Perl recognize non-regular languages, through the backreference operators (\1 \2 ...).  So mentioning regular expressions in a sentence with Unix tools and Perl, then saying that FSA are mathematically equivalent to regular expressions makes use of both senses of the term.  --jonsafari 23:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the term ''Regular Expression''

message: I have copied the section Theory_of_computation#Other formal definitions of computation to the Computability article and will just be leaving a stub here. I think this article should be fairly brief and mainly just disambiguate to computability and complexity and this section gave too much detail a level down in the computability branch. Dmcq (talk) 16:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As the person who suggested the section move, I can only agree :) Pcap ping 18:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Other formal definitions of computation to Computability 

message: IS THERE ANY CERTIFICATION TO DO IN THEORY OF COMPUTATION??
58.68.66.251 (talk) 08:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  certification in Theory of computation 

message: It seem to me that this " P " should be a minor subsection of the model of computation article, not a major subdivision here. Any comments? --121.45.201.112 (talk) 12:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  P′′ as a major model  

message: Use of the following template seems unwarranted: 
 
because the section provides a concise overview of other available models.
Therefore, I have removed it.
yoyo (talk) 20:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Models of computation section is not overly detailed 

message: Tolck 105.166.213.117 (talk) 19:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:Troy Wilson (Australian rules footballer)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 03:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: We need more detail on his motorsport career, what team did he drive for and stuff like that.  Rogerthat Talk 00:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:ACC (company)

message: * I don't remember for sure, but the office location is just outside the south end of Churchgate Station. 
* The stock of ACC is ticker ACC and is a blue chip company. Again, need to verify that. Npindia 00:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Speak in Marathi 206.84.224.69 (talk) 14:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACC CEMENT INFORMATION IN MARATHI 
Talk:Tiger (Boy Scouts of America)

message: Are the Tiger Cubs no longer a separate entity, with their own meetings and leaders etc., and are now just a rank for the Cub Scouts?  Could someone with this knowledge clean up and clarify this.  Tiger Cubs where I grew up in the 1980s/early 90s where a separate entity and after outgrowing them you would then move up to Cub Scouts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.85.217 (talk • contribs) 
This article was merged into Cub Scouts (Boy Scouts of America), then restored after a dispute, but no one is really maintaining this.    Yes, Tiger Cubs were integrated in 2001.  See the Cub Scout article for more info. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 22:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Are the Tiger Cubs still their own group

message: It is proposed that the Cub Scout ranks be merged into one article per discussin at the Scouting portal.  Please discuss at Talk:Advancement in Cub Scouts (Boy Scouts of America).
--Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Moldovan language/poll

message: This is a poll for the Moldovan language article regarding the infobox.
Please indicate your support or opposition to the statement "The Moldovan language article should have an infobox" below.
Voting starts on Monday 00:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

message: "Voting starts on Monday 00:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that in a poll when only one person decides the rules of the game has no significance and should be delcared void. We have already decided on what to do at the moldovan language page. As far as I am concerned this poll is nothig more but a silly joke.Constantzeanu 03:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support Constantzeanu's comments in full. | Klaw ¡digame! 04:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Shelley Winters

message: I think I see her cuddling a flyboy behind "Shorty" playing the piano in the "Eyes of Texas" USO scene in "Thirty Seconds over Tokyo" (1944). Does anyone else confirm this sighting, which is not listed in IMDB yet? GBS2 (talk) 02:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra appearance discovery

message: While her year of passing is listed just after her name as 2006, the first line of text appears to indicated she died in 1999.  Can some one confirm the year of her death and correct the incorrect info?
Zanshin (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of Passing 

message: See http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,182446,00.html for info about deathbed wedding.
Also, IMDB.com lists Gerry DeFord as her husband, 13 January 2006 - 14 January 2006 (her death)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001859/bio 
67.42.85.2 04:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Statement not supported. Website contains no information to support assertion wedding not legal. Jake b 02:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deathbed Wedding 

message: Her initial autobiography, Shelley: Also Known as Shirley (1980), was how I became familiar with her. It was a bestseller. How is it not in here!? Taking suggestions for best placement within the article, at User talk:Lawikitejana ... Lawikitejana 06:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are mentions of her autobiographies? 

message: It's known that Shelley Winters and Marilyn Monroe shared an apartment in Hollywood when they were both starting out as struggling actresses. Many sources refer to them living together in the late 40s, perhaps 1947. Can anyone provide more accurate dates? 64.136.26.22 (talk) 16:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roommates with Marilyn Monroe in 1947(?) 

message: Does this movie exist (however quoted in IMDB) ? Other filmographies of the actress don't cite that movie. Does anyone know something about it ? Gozitano (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  La dahlia scarlatta (1976) ?
Talk:Battle of Guadalcanal order of battle

message: Although they obviously can't be included in the official fighting portion of this account, I know the Seabees (including my father) were there? Any info around re this?
Vetkid (talk) 20:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guadalcanal 

message: The lede does not tell what the article is about.  At first it appears to be about the Battle of Guadalcanal.  It is actually about the Order of battle.  A reader like me should not have to spend 20 minutes to understand the difference between Guadalcanal campaign and Battle of Guadalcanal order of battle.   Comfr (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it. Hungrydog55 (talk) 15:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of battle