lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Los Temerarios

message: Any objections to merging this article?--Farbotron (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Fjosediaz30 (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Based off of my own search and the VRT note below, I'm going to boldly  the above template since there is no further action to take. There seems to be no action to take on VRT's end at this point; no permission has been received and the allegedly copyvio material has been revdel'd. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actualización de la Biografía 

message: relates to image release. Permission for text has not been provided. Last contact was in September, and the user has not yet responded to a request for further information. --Jack Frost (talk) 12:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Text
Talk:Portmanteau (suitcase)

message: The word is still very common in french. You could probably write a mention about that.
There is no portmanteau word in french but it is obvious that the english portmanteau comes from that spelling
A french reader, in Paris  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.242.1.83 (talk) 07:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porte-manteau 

message: Since this page was transwiki'd, and since the content was dictionary-like, I have replaced it with a soft redirect to Wiktionary:portmanteau. I also added the Australian usage that was noted here to that page. Cnilep (talk) 06:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft redirected to Wiktionary
Talk:Dream Street

message: Shouldn't this one be separated into two articles since they have nothing to do with each other? Alensha 17:23, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "In early 2002, the band went through a hard time in which they sued their managers. It is rumored that Baldonieri and Lukow mailed porn to the boys houses and tried to get them to have sex with random girls. Also, the managers made drugs and alcohol easily accessible to the underage teens. At first all of the boys were suing the managers, but Trousdale later decided to stay with the managers, resulting in a feud with the other boys. The boys didn't really hide their disagreement with his decision back in 2002. At the end of the lawsuit, the managers and Trousdale won."
I suppose this could in some way be reasonable, but I removed it until it gets sourced.
66.162.196.117 (talk) 16:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced ridiculousness

message: I understand that they broke up but what are they doing in there solo life? That part would be worth expanding. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 03:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath of Dream Street.
Talk:Croquis

message: The definition on this page is what I've always heard termed as a "gesture" drawing, in figure drawing and in fashion sketching classes.  I'm a fashion student right now, and when my teachers talk about croquis, it's always a fully developed figure, generally unclothed.  These figures are then traced and clothing is added to them, the naked figure stored for future reference so that designers don't have to draw out the same pose over and over. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Meichigo (talk • contribs) 08:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This is what I've always known as "gesture" sketch
Talk:Faggot (unit)

message: I hate to be the one, but... the connection is obvious and undeniably existent. There should be at least a link to the Wiki page for the slang term, if not even a paragraph explaining the connection. 31.16.189.247 (talk) 18:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the German version of this article. There the connection to the slam expression is explained very well. Miyska (talk) 21:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to the slang term "faggot" 

message: "It is the equivalent in rotational force (screwing) in inches (in.) per asymptote hole (a-hole) to being Tyson."
Blatant vandalism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swedra (talk • contribs) 16:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh... 

message: I removed the claim referenced to Cardarelli's book that there was a US measure called a "faggot", equal to 3/pi cu. ft., because this is simply the same as the historical unit described higher up. If a bundle has length 3' and circumference 2' then its volume is 3/pi cu. ft. Note that Cardarelli does not make a textual claim that the US unit was defined this way, he simply produces 3/pi as the conversion factor in a table of "US units of firewood". (This includes "cu. ft.", and it can hardly be regarded as evidence for the separate existence of a US unit "cu. ft.") Imaginatorium (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  rm factoid from Cardarelli 

message: So we really need all of the Middle English spellings of "faggot" and "kidd"? Any term that predates spelling standardization had multiple spellings. Meters (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  various spellings 

message: can a link be put here: Cord_(unit) as it seems to be locked I cannot do it easily.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.7.47 (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to cord
Talk:Oak Island

message: This date is wrong, Quote:  Oak Island Tours eventually dissolved, and in February 2019, it was announced that a new partnership had been formed with a company called the "Michigan Group".[17] 
If you look at reference 17, it does indeed give February 2019 as the date that the web page was posted.  But the change in partnership had to be much older.  It should be noted that the current website is a reconstruction of a previously expired and lost website.  The TV show first aired in 2014 at which point the new partnership was fully formed and active.  Also reference 17 says Quote: The treasure trove licence is in Mr. Tobias’ name, but the new group will be looking to transfer the licence, which is valid until July of 2008.  <<<  This strongly implies that the change in partnership happened prior to 2008.  During a quick look I was unable to determine the correct date, so did not make any changes to the article.  (too lazy to login, old codger).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.129.190 (talk) 09:21, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Date 

message: What’s a vibe check you ask?......
Let me Telepathically text you to see if your worthy.
            .........
Well you passed the vibe check!
Haha you had no idea I was actually tricking you by vibe 
Checking you! 
Now you know what it is :)(:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.249.64.108 (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vibe check 

message: Some mention needs to be made of several discoveries that add to the "mystery" of Oak Iasland.  Here is a partial list of items that should be mentioned:  
1. Discovery of European and Middle Eastern human bones from core drillings obtained below 90 foot depth.
2. Determination that the Triangle Swamp is historically young...about 400 years old, and contains within it several human constructed cobble stone paved areas.
3. Discovery of buried wood works at Smithe's Cove that pre-date any documented human activity.
4. Need commentary about the kind of workforce required to carry out the above mentioned discoveries.
~~Larry Kipp~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C5E:537F:4292:D41B:A4D8:5D33:2672 (talk) 03:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documented discoveries 

message: :Oak Island is a  privately owned island in Lunenburg County on the south shore of Nova Scotia, Canada. The tree-covered island is one of about 360 small islands in Mahone Bay and rises to a maximum of  above sea level. The island is located  from shore and connected to the mainland by a causeway and gate. The nearest community is the rural community of Western Shore which faces the island, while the nearest village is Chester. The island is best known for various theories about buried treasure or historical artifacts, and the associated attempts to explore the site.
I am moving this here for now for the record as the measurements are not sourced. Feel free to add these bits into the article's body if you can find the WP:RS for them. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:42, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead
Talk:Jacques Brel

message: Re: "he [Brel] became a major influence on English-speaking songwriters and performers such as David Bowie, Alex Harvey, Leonard Cohen, Marc Almond and Rod McKuen."
I've read and listened to countless lengthy interviews with Cohen, including a book of collected interviews, read two biographies of Cohen, read nearly all of his Cohen's published poems and his first novel, and own all of his recordings. I've never encountered any reference to Brel in any of this. (As for Bowie, he borrowed at bit of "Jef" for his "Rock and Roll Suicide" and performed a couple of other Brel songs. That doesn't make Brel a major influence on Bowie.) TheScotch (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cohen? 

message: Something wrong with the link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sciken (talk • contribs) 14:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorable performance on YouTube in 1973 

message: Final years and death section starts with the conjecture that the reader had already have the information. Can be better. 31.140.200.163 (talk) 08:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section starts with conjecture
Talk:List of funiculars in the United Kingdom

message: The article is basically two lists, as there is nothing particularly different about funiculars in the UK that are generic to the country (rather than specific to each individual railway) that requires a different article from the main one at Funicular, except the single sentence about the term cliff railway. This will also match the already existing List of funiculars in Switzerland. Thryduulf 18:20, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Arular

message: Why it is "Almost a month later, "Arular" was released in the UK with two extra tracks", while tracklist for US release contains 13 tracks and the tracklist for UK release contains 14 tracks? Is it a mistake or there are really 15 tracks on UK release?
Avel791 17:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  older entries 
Talk:Comparison of top chess players throughout history

message: Much of this article (at least the stuff not in the "statistical methods" section, which is new) has been moved from World Chess Championship (see that article's talk page for my thoughts on why this material is better in its own article). I have, however, deleted the below section:
:Hence, it is extremely unclear which single player truly is "the best", but nearly all lists of the best players include at least the following ten (in chronological order):
*Paul Morphy
*Wilhelm Steinitz
*Emanuel Lasker
*José Raúl Capablanca
*Alexander Alekhine
*Mikhail Botvinnik
*Mikhail Tal
*Bobby Fischer
*Anatoly Karpov
*Garry Kasparov
The list is completely subjective, and since we now have other lists which, while not really any more objective are at least attributed to particular sources, this one is probably unnecessary.
A note on Chessmetrics: it seems Sonas has recently overhauled the website, and a lot of the ratings seem to have changed (formerly, Capablanca had the highest 5-year peak average). The quote I've put in the article from him about it being impossible to compare ratings of players from different eras is from the old version of the website, but the ratings I've quoted are from the new version. I know this isn't ideal--it's a quick fix while I try to find a similar quote on the new site (if it turns out there isn't one... well, I'm not sure what the best thing to do will be then). --Camembert 18:39, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article content

message: I'm confused by this table. It states Carlsen hasn't won any FIDE titles, but this isn't true. It's not clear what a classical title is.  The linked article doesn't use the word "classical" in it, but mentions PCA. Something indicating that the first few columns are counts of titles, and that the last column is reign in years would help with clarity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.175.168 (talk) 09:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Champions by world title reigns Table Ambiguous Headers

message: I think that section is somewhat overblown. It is ok to report the first method of the three, but the other two feels more like "let me find a way to assign points so that the players I like will come on top". I think it is fine and necessary to point to the original article but I would trim the report of method 2 and method 3, removing those. Otherwise it is like this wiki article gives strength to the article (I know it shouldn't be the case, but surely it gives lots of visibility) and I think it is not a good thing. 89.14.26.201 (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. His three methods are attempts to answer different questions – "who was the best objectively", "who was the best comparing against their time", and "who had the most talent, i.e. who would perform best if they were in their prime today and had today's resources". It seems helpful to consider all three, since they are often conflated in discussions along these lines. Double sharp (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larry Kaufman (2023) section
Talk:Guo

message: http://www.whatsonxiamen.com/xiamen-info-596.html
http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/ANTH470Fanke.pdf
Claiming descent from Guo Ziyi
http://books.google.com/books?id=9MouAQAAIAAJ&q=guo+ziyi+hui&dq=guo+ziyi+hui&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ca-mUKaBIIr49gSZkIGICA&ved=0CEEQ6AEwBg
http://books.google.com/books?id=0o6xAAAAIAAJ&q=baiqi+fujian&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qX_SUKacE4L40gHzsIDoDg&ved=0CF0Q6AEwCTgK
http://books.google.com/books?id=bcsmAQAAMAAJ&q=baiqi+fujian&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9bKmUKrtHpKC8QSys4HwDw&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAg
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2E4AAAAMAAJ&q=baiqi+fujian&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wbOmULqGM4PK9gT6tIHIDA&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBzgK
http://books.google.com/books?id=KoiD_yafPT8C&pg=PA90&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WnvSUPHFMoKR0QH1wIHgCA&ved=0CGAQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=baiqi%20fujian&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=ddddmhXofKoC&pg=PA116&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WnvSUPHFMoKR0QH1wIHgCA&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=baiqi%20fujian&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=QgUoAQAAMAAJ&q=baiqi+fujian&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=U4HSUJ_JHcOZ0QGzuIGACA&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBDgK
The baiqi hui Guo clan in malaysia
http://www.islam.org.hk/eng/malaysia/ChineseMuslim_in_Malaysia.asp
百崎回族乡
http://books.google.com/books?id=PK_keabzacsC&pg=PA62&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=x3_SUOD-AojX0QHP7oHYDQ&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=baiqi%20fujian&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=sPo8qbj3N_MC&pg=PA299&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ooHSULzWA6Hj0gHz34CYCA&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=baiqi%20fujian&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=nPmAAAAAMAAJ&q=baiqi+fujian&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qX_SUKacE4L40gHzsIDoDg&ved=0CC8Q6AEwADgK
http://books.google.com/books?id=9MouAQAAIAAJ&q=baiqi+fujian&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NoHSUOONE6rh0wGR0oHoDA&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBg
http://books.google.com/books?id=sPo8qbj3N_MC&pg=PA299&dq=baiqi+fujian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NoHSUOONE6rh0wGR0oHoDA&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=baiqi%20fujian&f=false
http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/chinese-iranian-vii
Rajmaan (talk) 04:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  baiqi hui Guo clan 

message: The xia dynasty is mythicalFourLights (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Talk:Mouthguard

message: Invisalign is only a brand of a transparent aligner. There are dozens of brands of the same thing that work in a similar way. Ant they are NOT a simple substitute for brackets, because not all malocclusions and malpositions can be treated with an aligner. I'll change the word Invisalign to "transparent aligner".Maduixa (talk) 09:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisalign
Talk:Logical schema

message: I like to propose to merge Logical schema and Semantic data model here. This seems to be three alternative terms for one and the same thing. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 21:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess this isn't a good idea after all. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 22:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Logical schema and Semantic data model here 

message: The claim that "Currently, the choices [of a logical schema] are relational, object-oriented, and XML" is incorrect. XML is a coding method rather than a type of schema. Any type of logical schema could be represented in XML. I will reword this section soon unless people comment here about why I shouldn't.  Matthew C. Clarke  03:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now done this  Matthew C. Clarke  21:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove references to XML

message: Data modeling gives an overview of those three, so the compariso table would fit better there Dobinator (talk) 16:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Move comparison of conceptual, logical & physical data model to [[Data modeling]]

message: anyone able to replace this? site seems dead, thanks 86.158.66.129 (talk) 00:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: External link dead

message: Logical data models are typically developed for a specific application (e.g. Sales system, data warehouse), though the technology has not been chosen. For the former, operational system, you would normalise (typically to 4NF), but the BI manager would have screaming hab-dabs if you proposed anything other than a star schema for the data warehouse. As the logical model contains primary & secondary keys and relationships, surely you would also produce the logical model as either 4NF or star schema as appropriate the the business use of the application? MaryEFreeman (talk)
The article states that the LDM "Is normalized to fourth normal form (4NF)". That seems completely out of place since an LDM may not even be relational (could be ER, UML or some other). LDM is still an LDM whether it satisfies 1NF, 6NF or no NF at all. Oradium (talk) 16:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Conceptual v Logical v Physical 
Talk:Toxidrome

message: What does "pupils up" mean?   Could someone make the chart on the page more descriptive rather than something copied from classroom notes?   --74.179.121.14 (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's explained in the article - 'up' refers to dilated pupils, 'down' refers to constricted pupils. Nonagonal Spider (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  chart 

message: This article needs much more information than it does now. Either link to the individual substances' pages, or provide information here - history and progression of symptoms, differentials (especially non-toxidrome differentials), possible antidotes, supportive treatment, etc. Nonagonal Spider (talk) 16:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: doi:10.1056/NEJMra1705224 JFW | T@lk 09:32, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical weapons
Talk:Nova remnant

message: This translation template version can now be removed, as I have significantly updated the text. Furthemore, I had to rely more on primary references, as articles on these events are few and far between, mostly likely as novae events are not frequent. Furture updates could expnad this further, but it might be better improving the specific examples givenin the document. Thanks Arianewiki1 (talk) 12:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: New 2007 Update
Talk:Master class

message: Hi, from my experience these seem to be two different things. When I go to a master class I expect to either be a participant or an observer. If I am a participant then I am getting a private lesson with an audience watching. If I am an observer then all I am doing is watching. A clinic on the other hand is usually more group oriented and is often focused on a particular topic. --Amazzing5 15:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages|Merge]] with [[Clinic (music)]] 

message: Master classes for musical instruments tend to focus on the finer details of attack, tone, phrasing, and overall shape, and the student is expected to have complete control of more basic elements such as rhythm and pitch.
How is a pianist supposed to control the pitch? The pitch is set by the piano. I think something different is meant by that. --2.245.126.83 (talk) 23:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that too. I can't venture a guess what it is that is actually meant by "pitch". Were other instruments instead of the piano explicitly implied in the description of 'pitch'? 63.248.183.82 (talk) 03:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence 
Talk:Showgirl

message: "...no entertainment or dance skills".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny 42 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality  

message: This page  is racist --- "Showgirls are often associated with Latin music and dance, particularly samba[citation needed]."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14C:878F:842E:F994:F957:D7C3:E226 (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That was sometimes the case in the 1950s.  Not sure why it's "racist" to report on it, but it does seem out of place in the top section of the article... AnonMoos (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism
Talk:Maxim (saying)

message: I think this article shouldn't be moved, it should be expanded! I remember a lecturer in pragmatics (while studying linguistics at University College London) talking about maxims and... well I can't remember exacly what it was but let me tell you this, it was damn interesting and although I can't remember it too clearly I am certain that maxims carry some sort of significance in pragmatics and it deserves to be mentioned in this entry! (although I could be mistaken)Mackanma 00:40, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

message: I removed all the drivel, leaving nothing but a definition. I'd delete the article, but there are lots of links to it - can one create a REDIRECT page that redirects to the wiktionary definition? - DavidWBrooks 19:23, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 

message: "The result of the discussion was keep, no consensus." Why? All four votes in the AfD were for transwiki and delete, except the two who didn't bother with the "transwiki" part (of whom I was one). As I said on the AfD page, the deletion was uncontested and didn't even need to be AfDed. (Brian G. Crawford said it was contested, but I see no contest anywhere.) So, what's up? I'll re-add the  template in a day or three, but I'm notifying SushiGeek first. --Quuxplusone 03:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is because the votes were split. And after consulting with NicholasTurnbull about it, he said that it should end in "keep, no consensus". Thus, with a split vote (and you would have had to specify that you weren't bothering with the transwiki part, I had no way of knowing that), that was the result. But I'll change it. SushiGeek 04:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Mint condition

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 
Talk:Mudita

message: In the penultimate version, Mudita was said to be: 
Unlike the other brahmaviharas, mudita is traditionally not cultivated with respect to one's own good fortune, only that of others (one of the implications of the translation of this term as "sympathetic" joy).
NONE of the 4 brahmaviharas are in respect to one's fortune. How about Compassion, and Benevolence (Metta), and Equanimity??? These 'loving-faculties' are at the core of Bodhicitta.
Vajrallan 05:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It was suggested to me that the spelling that is provided here is actually wrong - Mudita would actually be spelled मुदिता. Any confirmation on this? I found one source for that: http://www.ashtangayoga.info/philosophy/yoga-sutra-patanjali/chapter-1/item/maitri-karuna-mudito-pekshanam-sukha-duhkha/ Regards, --Xolani (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling