lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Powder coating

message: There should be a paragraph about the preperation before the powder coating is applied, the cleaning, rinsing and galvanizing are very important parts of all paint and powder processes. --Ifrit 08:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Preparation

message: We've powder coated something, but we cant get any sattisfactory branding onto the powder coated surface. We've tried silscreening, engraving, and applying a stick-on, none are sattisfactory. Any ideas.
Yes.You contact me at vicks1974@yahoo.com
i can help u if possible.
:thank for not adding any contribution whatsoever. We have found that Laser engraving works wonders, for anyone interested.
Try baking 70% (7 minutes) - silkscreen  or print - then bake  to required time  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kentiger (talk • contribs) 14:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Branding

message: How  we inspect the quality of powder coating such as coating thickness, colour, etc. If any idea, contact me srijithmn@yahoo.co.in  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.42.21.148 (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of coating

message: I have added my website in the external link list. This website www.ipconweb.com is dedicated to the powder coating activity in India. It has been in existance for more than six years. I am surprised why it was removed!
:Perhaps because adding links to your own sites is against our conflict of interest and external links guidelines.  It also seems to be more about listing links to suppliers than providing much encyclopedic information, which I think pushes it into the "links to be avoided" category.  -- Siobhan Hansa 05:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I removed a commercial link to TNT coatings from within the article, it added nothing to the article and is a simply an advertisement
DRCarroll  —Preceding comment was added at 20:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Commercial Link

message: i dont think a Tg of 200ºC is accurate, since most powder coating resins have a Tg of 50 to a 100 ºC, also during curing  the powder only starts to melt when the reaction is going, giving a very bad appearance  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.229.52.189 (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  tg of 200ºC  

message: I deleted the text added by this user, which appears to have been added by the folk at PhotoFusion. The text removed was unencyclopaedic and read as an advertorial, and was unsupported by sources. I note the PhotoFusion website links to this page.
Otfordian (talk) 22:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted PhotoFusion reference
Talk:Harvey Pittel

message: Pittel may very well have been dismissed from Hemke's studio, but I have never heard of this, inspite of knowing both gentleman. Please cite your source, if you wish to include this information.  Musikfabrik 09:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article includes the "Complete Biography from the Saxophone Journal".  Is this a copyvio?--Mister Stan (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Brakeman

message: "Individually operated car brakes were replaced with automatic air brakes"   Not Correct     the writer should have said something like "remotely controlled brakes". Air brakes are designed to fail-safe automatically but to be operated manually in normal use (usually from the loco but controls are often provided at other points on the train) . 77.97.161.230 14:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vacuum brake is about one type of brake equipment, this article is about the job of brakeman.  Your last comment makes it sound like this article should be removed, and I disagree with that.  However, as to the points of automatic versus remotely controlled, and replaced with versus replaced by, this is a case of WP:BOLD; as I understand the braking systems work in the way you describe, so make the correction ().  Slambo (Speak) 15:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: The term "brakeman" was in use way before the alleged claim, not supported by the former Merriam-Webster reference, that it's first use was in 1833. In fact, "brakeman" appears to have originally been applied to someone who controlled the operation of steam engines even before they were used on the railway. For example, railway pioneer George Stephenson was 
I've removed the offending sentence, but a section on the history of the term, which appears to be relevant to railway history in any case, would be useful at some point. Bermicourt (talk) 10:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the term
Talk:Bloodhype

message: Having just re-read this novel, I happened across the Wikipedia page while looking up something else. I've corrected a number of major errors in the Plot section; among them:
* Mal arrives at Rose's compound separately (and after) the Church agents
* No one "tracks" Rose to his base, least of all the Church agents (who are captured when they accidentally blow their cover); Mal goes there openly
* The agents and Mal are totally unaware of each other until Rose has already started Kitten's torture
* A considerable amount of time passes between when Rose arrives at the AAnn base and when the Vom escapes
* Rose was not the brother of Chatham Kingsley (I have no idea how anyone could come up with that particular lunacy)
* No one "recovers" the bloodhype from Rose; the Vom inadvertently consumes it along with the drug dealer
One thing I have not yet fixed is the use of "Kitty" as a nickname. No one refers to Lt. Kai-sung as "Kitty". She's called "soft angles", and Peot has a word-picture for her, but never does anyone call her "Kitty".
I'm a fan of Foster and I was pleasantly surprised to find so many pages about his work, but it'd be nice if people read the book before writing the plot summary.
2603:6080:1103:EA00:0:0:0:5 (talk) 00:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot edits
Talk:Reunion (Foster novel)

message: I found :Image:ADF Reunion.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:ADF Reunion.jpg]]

message: :Image:ADF Reunion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ADF Reunion.jpg
Talk:Thelema.6

message: Where does ΠΑΝ ΣΑΤΥΡΟΣ come from for the name ov track four? On their Official website, it is just PAN SATYROS.
--76.31.3.181 (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Four
Talk:Double junction

message: Which issue of Trains (magazine) features diamond crossings?  (talk) 10:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trains (magazine) 

message: - delete.
 - keep.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wimbledon32 (talk • contribs) 08:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original pix needs deletion
Talk:Flying junction

message: Livesites doesn't work on Macs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.199.156.119 (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

message: As a reader, I don't understand the term 'LGV' used in the high speed rail section.  Perhaps this could be clarified, or a link provided to another article where the term is defined?  Benthatsme (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a link to LGV (Lignes à Grande Vitesse) (ie French high-speed rail lines) as requested.  Sorry it took so long; I only just noticed it. Tim PF (talk) 20:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible improvements 

message: The statement that the diverging speed on French LGV junctions is 160 mph is incorrect. The principal junction on the TGV Sud-Est at Pasilly where the line to Dijon diverges from the line to Lyon, and the junction on the LGV Atlantique at Courtalain where the line to Le Mans diverges from the line to Tours, are both equipped with special high-speed switches (points in British terminology) which permit a diverging speed of 220 km/h (140 mph).  
The article should be corrected.  I'm not making the correction because I don't know the computer procedure for entering the 220 km/h to 140 m;ph conversion.  
Incidentally, ordinary crossovers on French LGV's do in fact allow a diverging speed of 160 km/h.
Prospero10 (talk) 04:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the conversion template to that bit, so that "" gives "").  You should now be able to make the addition yourself.Like you, I'm not doing it myself, as it needs a reference or two for both 160 and 220 km/h diverging speeds, and I'm not going to make any uncited additions.When you add the reference(s), you'll need to remove the HTML comments around the new dummy "References" section (and you may also change the  to ).If you don't know the magic for citing a reference, reply here with a bare URL, and I'll wave a chicken over the article, if someone doesn't do it first. Tim PF (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

text: If you think that part of the current wording is incorrect, then it should either be amended (eg "and a normal limit of  for the diverging path"), or tagged with something like  (follow that link and you might find a better tag). Tim PF (talk) 11:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the case of Fretin, I think that Paris↔Brussels (main path) is 300 km/h.  Paris↔Lille (diverging) is ~200/220 km/h and Brussels↔Lille (diverging at both ends) is 160 km/h.  This is from published Video 125 cab videos and my (own) GPS data, but I don't have a source unless it's spoken on the video commentary.  —Sladen (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy concerning French high-speed junctions
Talk:Shunting (rail)

message: For UK practice  this needs expanding. A shunt move would seem to be any movement which is not a journey. 86.170.15.134 (talk) 09:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Citrate synthase

message: had a bash at starting the wkikfication - most of the text here is peripheral, describing a lab procedure involving citrate synthase  - and could be removed from an encyclopedia, making readability much better. Any thoughts? Will TALK 09:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that.  If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and remove it. RedRollerskate 19:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Bubbstar (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab - spring 2023
Talk:Aioi, Hyōgo

message: garbage collection info and current weather info.  Maybe a mention of why it has a Shinkansen stop would be more interesting.Peter Rehse 09:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we really need 
Talk:Mithridates I of Pontus

message: As far as I understand from Plutarchs Demetrius is the name of the father of Mithridates Ctistes is named Ariobarzanes.
--- runicrader  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runicrader (talk • contribs) 17:21, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dakhla-Oued Ed-Dahab

message: ===>POV issues What are the POV issues? From which POV is this article written? -Justin (koavf), talk, mail 15:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ethan Hunt

message: Copying from the AfD to here the list of sources I found providing significant coverage of the character:
:*Holding On: Mission: Impossible and the Myth of the Perfect Man
:*Contemporary Hollywood Masculinities: Gender, Genre, and Politics, pages 114-119 link
:*'Mission: Impossible': Ethan Hunt Is The Action Hero of a Generation
:*Screening Characters: Theories of Character in Film, Television, and Interactive Media, pages 267, 272-3, 276 link
:*Tom Cruise: Performing Masculinity in Post Vietnam Hollywood, pages 16, 39, 49, 127, 148 (at least) link
:*Sunday Reads: The Evolution Of Ethan Hunt, That Poor, Invincible Rag Doll Of A Man
:*On Film, pages 139, 148, 160, 168, 221 (likely more) link
Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to use
Talk:Statistically improbable phrase

message: I would imagine that if this kind of analysis were to be used on blogs or essays it could make for a wonderful new matchmaking tool. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.144.249.197 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 30 May 2006  (UTC)
As SIPs is (potentially) a generic term and not confined to Amazon.com space, then I think it should have its own page Geneffects 21:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, looking at the "Google hit" metric in detail (the results returned above), it doesn't seem remarkable or reliable. Application of the phrase (SIPs) in contexts other than Amazon appears to mean whatever the person typing the term wants it to mean. I don't see a consistent meaning as stated in the article (noted above as flagged for supporting citation). I also didn't note anything resembling a reliable source commenting on the usage stated. Perhaps it was overlooked? D. Brodale (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I can't find them with any searches. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 09:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did they vanish? 

message: Amazon has apparently trademarked a common phrase and wikipedia is advertising this feature. I'm not sure that meets notability requirements.  Is there any reason this article not to nominate this article for deletion? -- Louiedog (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: The article contains the phrase "SIPs with a linguistic density of two or three words". What does "linguistic density" mean in this context? Could lexical density be what is meant here? — The Anome (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linguistic density?
Talk:Behind the Harmony

message: This article came up with the "random article" feature, so I did a little cleanup, but I don't know jack about rap or hip-hop, so I'm not the right editor to work on this. It would be helpful if the article included such facts as highlighting any tracks that made music-industry charts, mentioning any change in the artist lineup, giving sales figures, etc. Lawikitejana 20:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for expansion
Talk:Gameplanet

message: Regarding this rationale for inclusion of the section; the comparison between Gameplanet and SA is not valid for two reasons: (1) The individuals mentioned in the "Personalities" section of SA are all writers/major contributors. While there are some other forum members who are notable within SA, the article does not list them because they are not notable as far as Wikipedia is concerned. (2) SA has a substantially higher profile than Gameplanet. OhNoitsJamieTalk 00:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "Members of notable mention"

message: Thanks to some editors blind reverting a large number of changes, I am filing an RFC on this article.
Besides the improper capitalizations in headings and elsewhere I fixed and which were also reverted, I have problems with other aspects of this article:
*The forums section does not seem overall noteworthy, as lots of sites have forums, and the details are insignificant.
*The forums crash section is wildly insignificant. Nobody wants to know or cares to know this level of detail. So the site was down. How is that encyclopedic?
*The External links section for some reason insists on having four separate links to the site, both the main page and subsection, when anyone going to the site could just follow the links there to the separate areas.
I had left those sections that were merely of questionable significance... and, frankly, I think it could be cut even more than what I had. But it looks like some fans of the site (owners?) think they WP:OWN the article. DreamGuy 20:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC 

message: Google took me to this article when searching for info on that website. Has anyone got info about it?
French Wikipedia has had an article up about it since 2012 at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamesplanet
Just not sure how trustworthy/suspicious it compared to more well-known stuff like fandom's Fanatical or Humble Bundle or direct Steam purchases. HearthHOTS (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gamesplanet]]
Template talk:Height

message: I've never lived anywhere where the height of people is measured in metres rather than centimetres (I'm Canadian and live in Japan).  Why does this template force output in metres—especially given it accepts input in centimetres? Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 02:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but the "See also" has some convert examples that output in cm so I guess it is hinting to use  for that (by the way, height calls convert to do the work now). In case you are not aware, some infoboxes no longer want a template—you just enter something like "5 ft 8 in" and it magically works out what to do. Johnuniq (talk) 03:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks!  That's a better solution. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 03:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

text: It's a very good question. One that keeps getting asked again, and again, and again...--45.72.141.216 (talk) 03:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The template now allows  to output conversions from feet and inches to centimetres. Example:  will display . More examples can be found in the documentaton. It was made optional to avoid affecting of any current uses of the template. Values other than "cm" are ignored, so  has no effect but could used:  will display  (similar to how  is used with the  templates). -- Zyxw (talk) 03:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Output in cm? 

message: I noticed today that Height has not been displayed in the infobox for Geva Mentor for 5 months due to this edit which introduced . This is an obvious error in template usage, but the editor did not notice that nothing was displayed in the infobox and there was no warning. Not sure if there are many more of these out there. Can this generate an error or be flagged in a maint category or something? MB 14:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I added :Category:Pages using height with unknown parameters, which will take some time to fill up.  we can remove this tracking if for some reason it's too much overhead. Frietjes (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error handling
Talk:Pearl River

message: What are the coordinates of the Pearl River? Like those for the Yangtze River and Yellow River. Utc-100 12:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: I see the use of "Perl River" in literature , commercial subjects , "Perl Strom" in the geonames DB .
And others. There is more evidence (especially in chinese local publications) and it seems to me, these are not mere typos. Does that justify to mention that alternate name in the initial sentence of the article, like "also 'Perl River'"? LinguistManiac (talk) 08:49, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to be more than incidentally used in reliable sources. The first two sources don't seem sufficient to establish that. The alternative name in Geonames, look like a Gernam name, not an English one. —Ruud 22:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Pearl River (China), the name in Chinese is literally "pearl river". The translation from Chinese in the first link appears to be an English translation typo by Amazon of the Chinese title. The title of that book is also translated "pearl river" elsewhere online. Captain Conundrum (talk) 10:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move all - No oppose !votes have been cast and no obvious policy/guideline reason not to move. (non-admin closure)  FOARP (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The concern about the Pearl River Delta is a good point, but it seems to me "Pearl River Delta" is a WP:partial title match; the Pearl River Delta is not often called "Pearl River" by itself in my experience. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 November 2021
Talk:Raila Odinga

message: Raila Odinga is much venerated by his followers. This veneration finds its expression in the many honorary nicknames given to him (to name but a few):
- "Baba" (Swahili for "father")
- "Tinga" (Swahili for "tractor")
- "Agwambo" (Dholuo for "mystery" or "the unpredictable")
Source: https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/entertainment/news/article/2001260166/baba-tinga-how-raila-acquired-his-five-popular-nicknames
IMHO, this is worth mentioning. If you agree, could you please incorporate it into the article? MFX (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a short section on Odinga's nicknames to the article. Kornatice (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Baba', 'Tinga', ...: Raila Odinga's honorary nicknames 

message: Raila Odinga's is no longer an AU envoy.The contract was terminated on 23 February 2023 154.159.237.0 (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2023