Talk:Borgward

message: We read that the new company was founded in 2008 and that this new company went on to start work on the new product three years earlier. Er, what? -- Hoary (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Revival

message: I found this while doing a quick search - http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=205 VoVillia 07:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source from 2005

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Borgward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110706234131/http://www.hralu.ch/cgi-bin/fnrGet.cgi?fnr=1003789069&amt=100&lang=1&hrg_opt=1100 to http://www.hralu.ch/cgi-bin/fnrGet.cgi?fnr=1003789069&amt=100&lang=1&hrg_opt=1100
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Borgward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100323052811/http://www.borgwardisabella.com/Seiten/BorgwardClub/History.html to http://www.borgwardisabella.com/Seiten/BorgwardClub/History.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/motor-shows-frankfurt-motor-show/borgward-bx7-suv-revealed-frankfurt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050924125854/http://www.borgward-ig.de/e/eindex.htm to http://www.borgward-ig.de/e/eindex.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Let's hear about this new company named Borgward, IFF we can do so from reliable sources and in a non-promotional way. Moreover, much of what's said is unremarkable: "the company aspires to become one of the leading electric-vehicle manufacturers in the next decade": Does any car company not aspire to become this? Should we start an article with a company's aspirations? Etc etc. -- Hoary (talk) 07:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: For your information, Borgward has sold approx. 75,000 units of BX5 and BX7 SUVs so far (January 2018). In a few weeks, it will be selling cars in Middle East markets and by mid-year Borgward will sell cars in Europe and South America. Moreover, "aspiring to become a leading electric-vehicle manufacturers" is not a priority for every automaker, as you will see by looking at the development strategy of most of the major car companies. Please read the new entry, which is not PR lingo and contains references.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.231.135.82 (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy to be informed. The article now starts "Borgward Group AG is a German-based international automobile brand, which carries the identity of former German premium brand Borgward. Borgward has started its business with a fleet of conventional SUVs with German design and engineering, with sales reaching approx. 75,000 units by January 2018." OK, but where is the evidence for this? The article doesn't seem to cite any. It just has evidence of "unveiling" and similar. Also, how does "Borgward Group AG is a German-based international automobile brand, which carries the identity of former German premium brand Borgward" better than, say, "Borgward Group AG is a German/Chinese automobile company using the name of cars made from 1937 to 1961"? (Actually I'm not sure of the latter year: this article is unclear on the matter.) The language still seems promotional. This is an encyclopedia, not a conduit for PR blurb. -- Hoary (talk) 11:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

text: Comments about the article on the new company should be posted to Talk:Borgward Group. And we don't normally treat YouTube videos as reliable sources; if nothing else, we prefer not to use primary sources. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 21:07, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: A new "Borgward" company

message: New docudrama about the "Borgward affair"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VZJkEaU3sk
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Aff%C3%A4re_Borgward  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:B40:2258:40BD:DA03:F458:EF6B (talk) 23:09, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV adaption 

message: The section controversial company bankruptcy is written like a book or documentary rather than an encyclopedia article chapter because of the following reasons:
Puffery words are used throughout the section.
There are subsections written like they are from a book about this situation. For instance, Cui bono? does not sound like the name of a chapter in a proper and informative encyclopedia chapter.
Very few references and many "citation needed" marks appear throughout the section. I personally think that either;
1. More references be added in where they're needed
2. The section be shortened down to where there are references
3. The entire section be removed to clean up this mess
This is just what I think should be done and I'd like more people to agree with me before any sort of action is done this section.
- WaddlesJP13 (talk) 00:19 UTC, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
:I've removed the content, it's been over a year; no response, no new refs, and the unencyclopedic content remained. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Written like a book

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion