lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brookville (band)

message: This article does not meet Wikipedia's standard of encyclopedic writing. It is written like a feature article or press release and thus needs to be revised. I will work on it in future but for now, editors should look at the Ivy page, for example, for how band articles should look.Greg Fasolino (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not encyclopedic 

message: The band changed their name to Camera2 in 2012.
Brookville
November 28, 2012 ·
CAMERA2 TAKEOVER: The band formally known as Brookville is now officially CAMERA2. Please direct your attention toward our NEW facebook page for regular updates.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/CAMERA2/223245484451128?fref=ts
http://camera2.com/
Not sure how this works but the page name should be revised asap.Greg Fasolino (talk) 00:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Category talk:Philippine films

message: Shouldn't the title of this category be Filipino films? Film Fan 14:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See this and more importantly this. Thanks for reverting an edit without first checking the MOS. That makes three times you've done that (this, French film titles and Japanese film titles). Disruptive editing could result in a block. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipino films
Talk:Brown University Orchestra

message: Could someone update the ASCAP adventurous programming section? Brown got the prize again this year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.148.31.106 (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated, thanks.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASCAP Award 

message: The conductors section is not going well. Perhaps someone with knowledge of the orchestra's history could update it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.18.142 (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conductors Section
Talk:Brownsville Station (band)

message: Honestly, can a southern rock band be from Michigan? 70.233.160.31 06:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not "Southern." In the beginning, they were considered to be a teen-club band, then a boogie/metal band, then a glam band with a few hits(Dick Clark refused to have them on his show even with hit records because of their outfits), then a sort of metal/boogie band. They always had country influences, their cover of "Sweet Jane" was very country-ish, but making them into a "Southern" band is inaccurate. JBDay 18:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fixing the "southern" bs. There is enough rubbish about early 1970s music on the net as it without leaving such nonsense in place.JBDay 02:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Islamic attitudes towards science

message: Citation 9:
"see also: Ruthven, Malise. A Fury For God. London; New York: Granta (2002), p. 126."
is not valid. 76.64.69.88 (talk) 03:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  introduction citing 

message: To be clear, the gibberish part was the part I removed. It wasn't English. How much clearer do I have to be, I dont have a metaphorical crowbar of understanding with which to insert this knowledge into your head. 
It has been removed again by another editor, so I just wanted to comment here, rather than the page history. - Roxy the dog  08:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted in my edit comment here, I have taken it a step further and removed the entire portion of material connected to the research of 'Mustansir Mir' - aside from the relative gibberish of the particular section most recently removed by other editors, none of this material is particularly substantive when speaking at an encyclopedic summary level about criticisms directed towards Islamic approaches to modern science. The views of 'Mustansir Mir' are not very important/due; what the article needs at this stage are sources summarizing the prevalent criticisms in the whole body of scholarship, not isolated academic opinions from individuals (- which would be far more due, in this instance, on a biographical article about Mustansir Mir, something that does not exist yet). Iskandar323 (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibberish 

message: As the heading suggests. Much of what is said here is either original research, synthesis, or citing of self-published sources. I don't know which sources should be removed, as it seems like some of them are by reputable academics, but I think a great deal of them should be scrutinised. Does anyone know the policy regarding SPS by academics? Dawkin Verbier (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article relies too much upon blogs
Talk:Brundlefly (band)

message: I don't think Brundlefly ever became a large band - but I remember buying one of their albums, and you can still find them online:
http://www.amazon.ca/Locked-This-House-Brundlefly/dp/B00004WGVK
http://www.mp3.com/albums/528260/summary.html
They don't seem like good candidates for being tossed.--Bookandcoffee (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an independent profile as well.http://www.musicemissions.com/artists/Brundlefly --Bookandcoffee (talk) 20:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contesting speedy deletion
Category talk:Israeli films

message: 2010s
* Zohi Sdome (2010) (Hebrew article)
* The Matchmaker (2010)
* The Human Resources Manager (2010)
2000s
* Turn Left at the End of the World (2004) (Hebrew article)
* Ahava Columbianit (2004) (Hebrew article)
* Aviva, My Love (2006) (Hebrew article)
* Rak Klavim Ratzim Hofshi (2007) (Hebrew article)
* Lost Islands (2008) (Hebrew article)
1990s
* Life According to Agfa (1992) (Hebrew article)
* Sipurei Tel-Aviv (1992) (Hebrew article)
* Zohar  (1993) (Hebrew article)
* Song of the Siren (1994) (Hebrew article)
* Lovesick on Nana Street (1995) (Hebrew article)
* Leylasede (1995) (Hebrew article)
* Afula Express (1997) (Hebrew article)
1980s
* Noa Bat 17 (1982)
* Shtei Etzbaot Mi'Tzidon (1986)
* Nisuim Fiktiveem (1988)
* Tel Aviv-Los Angeles (1988)
* Ehad Mishelanu (1989)
* Abba Ganuv (film series)
1970s
* Malkat Hakvish (1971)
* Azit Hakalba Hatzanhanit (1972)
* Kazablan (1974)
* Rak Hayom (1976)
* Hatzilu Et HaMatzil (1977)
* Ha-Lahaka (1979)
Please don't re-add this to the category mainspace. Lugnuts (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing films
Talk:Budapest String Quartet

message: I have added a summary of Nat Brandt's book and hope that readers find it useful. Budhen (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's extremely useful; thank you for posting it. I wonder whether the book includes a discography? Milkunderwood (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: I added links to a bunch of names, many of which are red rather than blue, indicating no WP articles. If it looks too ugly, go ahead and take them out. But my own preference would be to leave them there, if for no other reason than to suggest to other users that at least creating a stub would be useful. Milkunderwood (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  links added in History of the Quartet section 

message: I have the Biddulph Lab 120/1; the liner notes say "Some of these [1936] Brahms recordings ... where Ipolyi was still present ... [replaced by] Boris Kroyt ..."
But it doesn't specify who was on which ones. Milkunderwood (talk) 23:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding personnel where known 

message: Added proper inline refs. Budhen (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to review the article later. I have, of course, seen that you've been busy. Many thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline references 
Talk:Bulldog Mansion

message: A tag has been placed on :Bulldog Mansion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
 there are no references whatsoever and this Wiki article needs a lot of additional information
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. 
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  A2Die (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Bulldog Mansion]]
Talk:Kurobe Dam

message: All the sources I'm finding seem to say that Kurobe Gorge is not directly accessible from the Tateyama Kurobe Alpine Route, and that you have to leave that route and access the gorge by a different route. I think this claim should be investigated and revised.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:4023:AFB3:F600:D856:7C14:472C:760D (talk) 13:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurobe Gorge accesibility
Talk:Burn Season

message: I'm curious if anyone has a complete list of all the unreleased or B-side tracks that Burn Season ever released in one form or another. I would like to start compiling a list of all the other tracks and maybe make another album page called Unreleased Tracks. For the lingering Burn Season fans, this would be a useful feature and a nice touch.
I'll start with a list of ones I know are theirs:
1) Boredom, 
2) Pressure, 
3) Walk in the Garden, 
4) Monday, 
Any more that you could contribute would be appreciated
76.229.137.247 (talk) 01:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding more info
Talk:Burning Brides

message: I don't know that this article really qualifies as a stub per se. There's plenty of information in the body about the band. However the tone and style of the article is decidedly unsuitable for encyclopedia content. It sounds more like a bio from Rolling Stone or the liner notes to an album than anything else.
:I tried to fix that, but I don't know a ton about the band.  I based most of my information off of the band's bio on their site, and I don't even know what to say for the intro paragraph.  I certainly think it's past a stub, though. - Boss1000 03:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub & Tone
Talk:Whig

message: I reworked this monstrosity a little bit. First was deleting this note left by an anonymous editor:
:According to my encyclopedia the term whig derived from whiggamore which was "a Scotch word once used to describe persons from western Scotland" (World Book). The text above implies that the term whiggamore derived from the Whiggamore Raid. While as far as I can infer from the article I read, the term existed before the raid. In other words, unless I'm mistaken, the raid was named after the people, not the people after the raid. I realize you might not be able to use this since it comes from another encyclopedia. I looked at the source the author used and he seemed to make an inference that isn't supportable. [...]
Great observation, but it should be here, on the talk page. It seems to me, however, that both the original text and the anonymous note were correct, the former simply needing clarification. Based on a close reading of the 1913 Dictionary article and the About.com page, all "inferences" appear to be reasonable—the "raid term" was named after the "people term" that originated from the "horse term."
I tried to clear things up, and I hope it helped. — supreme_geek_overlord 06:06, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added some more references and tried to clarify this. Columbia is the only reference I've found to "cattle driver" – there are various interpretations of the origin of the term of abuse, most commonly it being a word used during the raid to urge on horses, subsequently modified by opponents to depict the covenanter faction in the Parliament of Scotland as yokels. Note that "whig" became a term for a faction in the Parliament of England before political union of the Parliament of Great Britain, and British Whigs together with Americans of the same political persuasion were involved in supporting the revolution, hence the later US party. .. dave souza, talk 13:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of term
Talk:Carbofuran

message: The very first sentence of this article,
"Carbofuran is the most toxic of the carbamate pesticides"
is not true. In fact, carbofuran belongs to the most toxic carbamate insecticides, but the most toxic derivative of all used commercialy is aldicarb. The respective LD50 values for rat, oral, which are used as standard quantifiying methods of mammalian toxicity are 14 mg/kg for carbofuran and ~1 mg/kg for aldicarb.
I change therefore the sentence to following:
"Carbofuran belongs to the most toxic carbamate pesticides"
--84.163.99.87 00:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the focus of this article should be the chemical compound itself, including all the various characteristics, including toxicity. But the focus seems to be to describe it mainly a health hazard.  I think a more balanced rewrite is in order.Landroo (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicity 

message: It has been reported in the media http://www.cyprus-mail.com/pets/alarm-over-new-poison/20110526 that carbofuran has been illegally imported into Cyprus from the occupied area and has been used to poison domestic pets. Devilinhell (talk) 08:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deliberate poisoning of pets
Talk:Nauvoo Temple

message: I have seen reference to the Great Hall as well as the Grand Hall. Does anyone know which term is correct? Bytebear 04:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Hall 

message: The description in the "Basement" section says the spiral staircases were in the northwest and northeast corners, but the plan shows them in the northwest and southwest corners. Which is correct?Floozybackloves (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Other parts of the article make clear that th "northeast" is a mistake for "southwest". I will correct the text.Floozybackloves (talk) 04:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staircases 
Talk:C.I.A. (band)

message: Anyone know if the K-Dee referenced here as a founder of C.I.A. is, in fact, the J-Dee who founded Da Lench Mob?Czrisher 21:05, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, K-Dee did not found that group. I removed that information. Tasc0 It's a zero! 22:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  K-Dee vs. J-Dee
Talk:Cactus World News

message: See that my edit was removed by @Nikkimaria. I viewed the episode on a DVD prior to adding this. Would the DVD set be a reliable source in this instance? If so, I will add the sentence in again with that as a reference. Waiwhetu (talk) 04:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No - per MOS:POPCULT secondary sourcing is needed. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of song in Miami Vice episode
Talk:Cadallaca

message: I have an itch to redirect this article. It doesn't have much more in it than the discussion of Cadallaca in the Sleater-Kinney article; an association which I am taking for the assertion of notability. Other editors' thoughts? Zytsef (talk) 02:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to Sleater-Kinney
Talk:Cadillac Don & J-Money

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Cage (band)

message: This shit needs cleaning badly. Sounds like the band wrote it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.155.126.139 (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I'll try and work on a rewrite of it when I have some free time.--E tac 07:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mustang Band

message: *do what needs to be done to eliminate the stub classification.
*proofread first paragraph
*make second paragraph less wordy
*give bulletted entries in History section parallel structure
*Directors section doesnt indicate difference between list and biographies.  links on both biographies broken
*Marching Season--copy edit for word repetition and sentence sense and definition of unfamiliar terms. Rethink the heading for this section.
*Pep band needs copy editing for grammar.
*Introductory sentence to Sections needs tightening.
*Throughout, check use of its and it's--the first is possessive, the second a contraction
*Student officers section is very messy
Overall, this is adequate but seems to be packed with material that has little interest to the general reader, e.g. the full biographies of the director and assistant director and the detailed functions of all the officers.  The most engaging information is provided in the discussion of the band's activities. 
There is mention of a historian and of archives.  This could be turned into a more lively article with stories about band history and accomplishments.   
Grade available after copy editing.  Further substantial changes can raise the grade. 
Rudolph2007 20:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Candela (American band)

message: The tag is invalid. The band has produced albums. It exists for long time. This is assertion of notability. I will provide more references in some time. `'Míkka>t 20:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if this is going to satisfy WP:BAND. the_undertow talk 21:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

text: We don't delete an article just like this when it's not a candidate for speedy deletion. Nominate it for deletion if you think that it fails WP:MUSIC. CenariumTalk 14:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Cannibal & the Headhunters

message: User:98.119.162.85 has repeatedly tried to insert unreferenced material into the article.  Any explanation of this action should be set out below.  Thank you.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be awhile--I reported the user to AIV and xe has been blocked for 2 weeks.  If xe hops IPs, we can always ask for semi-protection.  I mean, if the IP wants to actually discuss the issue, and explain what the thinking is (and, ideally, provide some other sources), that would be best, but as long as xe remains uncommunicative, there's not much else we can do.  Qwyrxian (talk) 07:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of referenced text 
Talk:CJCH-DT

message: I think C H stands for Carlton Hotel, which is where the original CJCH radio broadcast from...  not Chronicle Herald as per this article... WayeMason 00:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CPO (group)

message: So it started w/ the World Class Wreckin Crew, then JJ Fad, then NWA? Then DJ train helped out MC Ren?? I dont get it, was Ruthless Records in existence before Gangsta Rap? Like if they did JJ Fad style music! RealG187 20:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWA
Talk:Cappella Romana

message: Katr67 (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find sources 

message: A quick check (see above) reveals coverage of this ensemble in numerous publications, including the New York Times, the Washington Post and the San Francisco Examiner. According to the New York Times: "Cappella Romana have garnered critical acclaim for their concerts and recordings." A quote from a book published by the Oxford University Press says: "Cappella Romana...who have made a hugely important contribution to the discography of medieval Byzantine chant with the set Byzantium in Rome..." The group premiered a work written especially for them by notable British composer Ivan Moody. Also since this is not a WP:BAND, it would be better to apply the criteria of WP:MUSIC#Others:
"For composers and performers outside mass media traditions:
#Is cited in reliable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching in a particular music genre.
#Has been a significant musical influence on a musician or composer that qualifies for the above list.
#Has established a tradition or school in a particular genre.
#Has composed a number of melodies, tunes or standards used in a notable genre, or tradition or school within a notable genre.
#Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture."
The article definitely needs expansion and citations, but lack of citations is not a criterion for deletion. Katr67 (talk) 01:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenging prod
Talk:Captain Ahab (band)

message: I'm not sure if this band is notable enough for their own article. I declined speedy deletion because the band has had songs appear in major national TV shows, which is a clear claim of significance, enough to not be speedily deleted.  However, to be considered fully notable, a band has to meet WP:BAND; one thing that says is that having music in a major tv show may help establish notability, but if it's the only claim, it's probably better to just mention them in the article about the tv show/episode.  So, unless more sources can be found to verify notability, I may nominate the article for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Captain Ahab's website has a page listing a number of articles/reviews about them.  The highlights seem to be a Pitchfork review of a recent track and a Skyscraper magazine article that was in a 2006/2007 print issue. 208.40.178.2 (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Did they split up?  What happened to them? Maikel (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did it end?
Talk:Carabao discography

message: Amendments and corrections of the Carabao Discography are according to the official list on carabao.net and further explanations and pictures on (by KaiDao): http://www.razyboard.com/system/morethread-carabao-diskographie-carabao-2042631-5028871-0.html (new link!)
--Tomyumbao (talk) 14:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carbonized

message: Shouldn't this band be labeled grindcore? I've always considered their early albums to be grindcore, not "progressive death metal". I know Encyclopedia Metallum labeled them as "progressive death metal" but their songs are really grindcore hitting the 3 or 4 minute mark which is unusual in the genre. Still doesn't make them death metal though. Just my opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.65.178.224 (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Grindcore