Talk:Reintegrationism

message: The problem in my opinion is as simple as this: moder orthography of Galician has taken us away of our past. Yo can go walking by Pontevedra or Santiago and read 6 hundred or 7 hundred years old "reintegrationist" phrases like "Estevan Martis regedor mandou fazer esta obra era MCCC" ("Stephan Martin, mayor, ordered this building aera 1400"), that look and feel like portuguese to most modern galicians, but that are pure and simple Galician in its old tradition and ortography. 
-Cadroyolo-
:Your wrong simplification of reintegrationismo only to orthography leads me to enlarge the article. Thanx Sobreira 19:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinion

message: I think this article omits a fulcral point: that of the "isolationist" point of view in fact is "spanish" point of view. Current ortography ("official") of Galician is, purely, the Spanish one almost  exactly. An authentic "isolationist" philosophy in fact would develop a different and by its own ortography, and not to convert Galician in a subsidiary language (or dialect) of Spanish. This is the fulcral point about "isolationism", and not the nearer or the farther from Portuguese may be these ones or those others. "Isolationist" would be more consistent if Galician ortography would be as different from Portuguese than from Spanish, so, really, the "isolationist" position is in fact a "pro-Spanish" position about the "natural place" of Galician. Of course, it is not new at all, with many examples in Europe itself (Moldavian vs. Romanian, Catalan vs. Valencian, Flemish vs.Dutch and so on).212.51.52.4 (talk) 23:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not. "Isolationism" can be ultimately traced to the work of Rexurdimento and later writers who adapted Spanish ortography to write in the Galician language, some decades before the medieval writings were discovered. With the possible exception of Carvalho Calero no significant modern Galician writer has ever used any kind of reintegrationist ortography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CadavoBis (talk • contribs) 
The fact that Galician and Spanish have a very similar grammar and spelling doesn't make Galician a dialect. It's the result of a natural evolution of the language (which wasn't too different to start with since they are both ibero-romance languages) caused by several periods of linguistic (and socio-political) oppression from the Spanish government (Namely, the dark centuries and Franco's dictatorship). Reintegrationism pretends to return to the old grammar and spelling, forcing the evolution of the language.
I don't think that transforming the language into something that only some nationalist speak, and when talking in public, is a good way to recover a language.
--83.43.149.218 (talk) 09:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Give a Clear View

message: Hello - this article is called simply Reintegrationism. I came here from a link in the Galician language.  I find this title odd, simply because I've never heard of it before, and yet it has a very broad title, Reintegrationism, rather than for example Galician Reintegrationism.  Alternatively, are they other examples of reintegrationism in other parts of the world that should be added to the article?  It would be odd for an English language term to refer specifically to Galicia. Stevebritgimp (talk) 13:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't think of any concrete examples that use reintegrationism as a term, but the tendency could be found in any similar languages separated by a border: Scots and Irish Gaelic, Cornish and Breton, Dutch and Flemish dialects...  Still find this one odd.  It might well have common currency in Spanish, but not in English.  All google hits are for definitions of what it is, rather than general discussions where the term is understood. Stevebritgimp (talk) 14:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article - Galician versus other possible examples 

message: An external link to a political party ("NOS-Unidade Popular") has been added. I think we should stick to linguistic resources/references ONLY. If we start adding links to political parties or organizations using this or that norm we won't be done in 10 years... Reintegracionism may be linked to politics (as with everything in Galicia really), but it is not about politics. I think it's important to make that distinction!
Remove it?
Swamp Greetings (talk) 10:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I’d like some evidence for this before including it. Was it specifically disallowed at any point by any particular authority? Or, being seen as merely a peasant jargon, did it simply never occur to anyone to give it official treatment, the same way very, very few would ever think of drafting a legal document in e.g. Cockney or Black English? —Wiki Wikardo 12:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Certainly not allowed to be used officially” 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Reintegrationism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005063224/http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=11 to http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=11
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511002728/http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=5 to http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=5
*Added  tag to http://recantodasletras.uol.com.br/artigos/1133552
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717071614/http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4242 to http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4242
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061102180041/http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/cvc/hlp/biblioteca/novaproposta.pdf to http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/cvc/hlp/biblioteca/novaproposta.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080930002413/http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=15 to http://www.agal-gz.org/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=15
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)