Talk:Invasion (2005 TV series)

message: As of May 12, 2011 the show is airing on SyFy channel.  I can't seem to edit the wiki page on my IPad (but could edit discussion, go figure) so I'll leave the info here and  try again later if no one else has updted the page.
The schedule on SyFy can be found at this link
http://www.syfy.com/schedule/index.php?search_text=Invasion  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fxbear (talk • contribs) 02:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently Airing 

message: Can anyone add the freaking plotline of Invasion to this article? I could care less about the ratings or why it was cancelled, I want to actually know in somewhat depth of what the hell this show was about.
:It still needs to be expanded! It still feels garbled and vague. 69.201.159.57 (talk) 05:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: To be completely honest, although the show is good, it's by no means in the league of 'Lost', and the continual irregular airing of the shows is likely to add to the viewer's dispondancy. I can now 'give or take' it, especially when the storyline seems to be dragging itself out.
:I think Lost drags itself out far more than Invasion does. Lost is better because it was a properly-planned, well thought out series - Invasion was rather rushed in an attempt to cash in on the sudden resurgence of the Sci-Fi genre, but it has developed into a reasonably decent show. The continuous mucking about with the schedule is doing more harm than anything else. I like that Invasion is darker than things like Surface - much more in the vein of American Gothic than Threshold. -- Scjessey 17:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Idea of Dropping the Show 

message: I removed this sentence:
:Since the events of Hurricane Katrina did not affect the advertisement campaign in the UK it has been able to receive a cult status similar to that of Lost. 
I consider it highly unlikely that this alleged "cult status" is due to advertizing. Burschik 13:14, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A good move. ×Meegs 13:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claim 

message: Are you sure it's cancelled and not just... very posponed? I mean, it was left of at a major cliffhanger with many unclosed plot points and was referred by ABC as the 'season finale' rather than the 'series finale'. - Joshua368 16:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really Cancelled? 

message: ABC is responsible for wrecking this show by constantly taking it off the air. I have never seen a network ruin a show in this way, taking it on and off to the point where it was hard to follow what was going on, reducing viewer interest on purpose and generally screwing it up to the point where they could justify canceling it. 
They could have started it in a far better time slot where it would have had a chance to succeed. I think they wanted to kill it from the start, as soon as they realized Hurricane Katrina could very well cause some sensitivity. They could have started it later in the season or even next year and given it a decent chance to succeed. 
Look what they did to LOST! Every time I turned it on, it seemed like I was watching some old episode from who knows when. I finally gave up making time to watch it - got tired of being disappointed. 
I'm not going to bother watching ABC shows next season. I'm not interested in watching things that go on and off the air and run old episodes in the middle of new ones at their whim. They did it with two good shows this year - wonder how many they'll do it with next year?? (As many as they can get away with!) 4.234.33.216 23:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ABC Ruined INVASION 

message: :A few thousand signatures on an online petition isn't going to make any difference. Remember that it was cancelled because it lost about half of the Lost viewing audience. The petition would need to attract millions of signatures just to get noticed. -- Scjessey 10:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petition 

message: Would someone mind remaking the family tree using the Familytree template? --DrBat 18:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I had to use solid lines for active marriages, against convention, so that I could use dotted lines for the two dissolved ones. ×Meegs 20:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was thinking if it would be ok to put thumbnails to the family tree... The problem is that not all the actors have their photo in wikipedia (actually only 3 of them do have a suitable photo), and I'm not exactly experienced in obtaining images for wikipedia, I'm scared to break some copyright etc... Anyway it would look like this.  Ideas? --Tartaros 22:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family tree 

message: :Image:Invasion CS.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Invasion CS.jpg

message: :Image:Inva0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Inva0.jpg

message: The complete season 1 is going to be released (or has as the date in the second link refers to it being released in 2007) in region 4.  EzyDVD MichaelDVD
Clofts (talk) 03:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD in Region 4

message: According To Jon Ehrlich, CD will be available soon at moviescoremedia.com.
I deleted the soundtrack section because it appear to simply be an advertisement and I can't find evidence a soundtrack even exists.  Someone can restore it and cite it if a soundtrack exists. Bradkoch2007 (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Invasion (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222163748/http://www.moviescoremedia.com/invasion.html to http://moviescoremedia.com/invasion.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Invasion (U.S. TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151029112103/http://www.ezydvd.com.au/DVD/invasion-2005-the-complete-series-6-disc-set/dp/791251 to http://www.ezydvd.com.au/DVD/invasion-2005-the-complete-series-6-disc-set/dp/791251
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Invasion (American TV series) →  – Use year vice nationality in order to eliminate ambiguity with Invasion (2021 TV series). -- 2pou (talk) 06:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 November 2021