Talk:Social web

message: The reference mentioned above: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,985581,00.html
is a nice reference from 1996. The quotation is apt. 
But which article mentioned above is the predated one? Is it  the
The Social Web Research Program at
http://www.fit.fhg.de/~hoschka/Social%20Web.htm dated 1998? This is a nice historic document.
The other reference is CSCW research at GMD-FIT: from basic groupware to the social Web at
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=290576
This is not good at all in the sense that the material is not generally accessible. I do not have an ACM account.
(Михал Орела 15:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MR. RHEINGOLD'S NEIGHBORHOOD 

message: I have added a people-friendly definition of Social Web and give Flickr as a first example. 
I now propose to give a few others grouped appropriately. For example, MySpace, Bebo, and Facebook are all in the same category of "I want to tell you all who I am and what I do and what I like".
(Михал Орела 16:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New definition of Social Web 

message: I like these. I wondered where they came from. I googled: social attributes identity who are you, and found a direct source at http://connollyshaun.blogspot.com/2008/05/7-key-attributes-of-social-web.html (date of last access 2008-07-01)
At the very least one ought to have added this reference. (Михал Орела 08:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 7 Social Attributes 

message: I like the picture that's been uploaded to the main page a lot, and I decided to look around the web for some additional ones. The two I've liked so far are this and
this. I was also considering adding a graph to the history section that would give more exact dates for the transition from static web sites to two-way conversation and then multi-way conversations. What do you guys think?--Rsoruss (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Images are nice, as long as they are relevant. But remember that images have to be free. See my comment to Erik here for what I mean, and guides that explain how to work with images. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures/Graphs

message: *Temporarily moved these section to the talk page so we can determine if they're worth inclusion in the article anymore. In the case of the "future of the social web," I feel it will need to be reworked if it is to be reincluded--Rsoruss (talk) 01:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporarily shelved sections

message: Social interactions through the social web have become a vital part of life for many Internet users, as many social websites support a small number of default groups and assign new members to one or more of them, also allowing members to explicitly form new groups, and/or join them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsoruss (talk • contribs) 12:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Social interactions

message: Good start. But:
# only the first sentence uses the term "social web", and it is uncited
# the rest of this para is about social media, not social web. One of your tasks should be to clarify this distinction (what is the difference between social media and social web)?
# do not capitalize words unless they should be capitalzized. Neither social web nor social media should be capitalized, they are just regular words.
Keep up the good job, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  21:26, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the feedback Piotrus -- I'll look for a source to cite for that first sentence but as I understand it the social web is a term that encompasses interactions that occur primarily on social networking and social media sites. Because of that I felt it made sense for the history section to relate heavily to the development of such sites. I'll keep my eye out though! --Rsoruss (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick review of the History para 

message: Hey Guys,
I was reading the economic globalization page, and it got me thinking that maybe we could mention something on how the web impacts other countries.  Not a lot since were focusing on the social aspects of the web, but I think it would be something interesting to consider.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjc106 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks guys -- yeah some of the sections are a little brief but we'll be adding to them shortly!--Rsoruss (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Thanks Bruce, a good suggestion -- the source referenced doesn't give a great overview of the original intent of the internet, so there's definitely room for expansion and clarification there!--Rsoruss (talk) 22:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classmate Reviews 

message: In addition to what I wrote on the history section, here are some other thoughts:
* intro (WP:LEAD) should summarize the article, not introduce new concepts
* definition of what social web is should be referenced; while the lead first para has an end reference, it is not clear if this covers more than the very last sentence
* Proteus effect - seems mostly unrelated (too detailed), it should probably be split off to its own article (assuming it is notable). Remember, this article is about social web, and should not into too minute details of some obscure related phenomena
* as I told you earlier, some old content of this article is junk, don't hesitate to move it here and out of your way
* "The first is an open global distributed data sharing network similar to today's World Wide Web, except instead of linking documents, the Social Web will link people, organizations, and concepts." - the first what? This unreferenced sentence is one of the examples of what you may want to kill (at the very least, it needs rewrite & referencing)
* "Open social networks using FOAF has been around since 2000." - so how is it relevant? And unreferenced
* "Perhaps the best analogy for the Social Web is the worldwide banking and credit card system." - perhaps yes, perhaps not; in either case, "perhaps" is not a very encyclopedic style. Also - says who? Unreferenced, raises possible WP:NOR issue...
* "Earlier uses of the term include:" - lists with one bullet point should not really be lists...
* "Social interactions" - relevance?
* "Web to Real Life" - and an entire section that does not even use the term "social web" at least one. Either it needs to be adapted (rewritten with sources that use this term), or it should go. Remember: "social web" =/= "social media", "Internet", "world wide web"... it is something more specific that you need to clarify
* did I mention earlier that you may want to start by (re)moving a lot of the existing content? It creates an illusion that there is meat to this article, where in fact there is just a lot of junk that will get in your way. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  04:29, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some spotchecks 

message: An image used in this article, File:Social Web Share Buttons.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 7 June 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Social Web Share Buttons.png)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Social Web Share Buttons.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: dingklik.heck.in adalah blog ter baik  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semrawut (talk • contribs) 12:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  dingklik.heck.in