lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Panphobia

message: Does this thing have any documented cases? Sounds a bit impractical. Kisch (talk) 23:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: In both http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pantophobia and http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/panophobia it says that each term is often confused with another. --194.85.161.2 (talk) 10:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with Pantophobia 

message: I don't have a source for this, but I'm fairly certain the origin of this word is not the god Pan, but rather the prefix pan- meaning all or everything.  Some other examples of this prefix would be Pandora, Pangaea, pantheon, pansexuality, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.172.139 (talk) 03:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: Add the following illustration to the top of the article:
 31.48.185.166 (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2018 

message: To be honest, I don't think the disambiguation page should link to biphobia since pansexuality and bisexuality are regarded as two different orientations from within the LGBT community. It would be better to link it to a different page discussing hatred against pansexuals or the LGBT community. 12.17.177.164 (talk) 10:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What page might that be? --Damian Yerrick (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biphobia
Talk:Cath Maige Tuired

message: The entry cited in DIL is for 'tuirem', which means (a) counting etc. and under (b), it specifies 'Mod Ir' for 'lament' etc. Cath Maige Tuired is not referenced in this entry.
The entry in DIL for 'tuir', pillar, does seem more plausible, although again there is no reference to the Cath.
Is there any other evidence to suggest lament over pillar?
Marcas.oduinn (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of 'tuireadh'
Talk:Mr. President (title)

message: Marilyn Monroe put a sultry tone to the phrase upon singing "Happy Brithday" to President John F. Kennedy. In context, the phrase "Happy Birthday, Mr. President" is associated with her attraction to President Kennedy, and a broader reference to the sexual appeal of the power of office
This needs to be explained because it isn't clear how you arrive at that conclusion nor is it sourced so we can't know if it is original research. EconomicsGuy Return the fire! 05:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marylin Monroe

message: According to Miss Manners, the proper way to address a former President is by the office he previously held before the presidency.  
:The rule is that there is only one president of the United States at a time; therefore, the title does not accompany anyone out of office. Many lesser titles do, however, so a former president generally uses his last such title. The proper address is Senator Nixon, as it is Governor Reagan and Governor Carter. </I>
However, as this is etiquette and not a rule, can/should it be included in the article? Lovellama (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Use the quote you've already pasted in, properly referenced, and add it. I'll remove the incorrect statement. Here's another source if anyone else wants to add it: (I don't have time today There's Only One Mr. President  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.100.203.56 (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Address for Former Presidents 

message: In the U.S., the title is reserved for the current President and should not be used for former Presidents. Although when addressing a former president, it is proper to use the title in an honorary sense.[8][9][10]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.225.174 (talk) 10:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This paragraph is of no use whatsoever 

message: Reagan also addressed Carter with the title in his inaugural address, even though Carter ceased being the incumbent president seconds earlier, so the article reads that this may have exceptions, not sure if it is worth mentioning, though. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs)  23:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Exceptions
Talk:Ness (Irish mythology)

message: The name Neasa should NOT redirect to this page. Diarmuid and Neasa is another irish mythical story and Neasa is a different name. Also, I know a girl called Neasa and when people call her ness or nessa it really annoys her (possibly because Ness sounds like a fat girl's name, at least when I hear it I picture a chubby girl. Now I'm not saying chubby is bad or anything, I'm just saying Neasa brings a... leaner vision to mind.) So in the interest of encyclopedic stuff, and my friend's pet hate, please change it! (cause I don't know how/can't be arsed). 68.6.186.247 (talk) 03:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from Neasa
Talk:Jennie Lakes Wilderness

message: there should be forest service stubs, as this is not a park service article.  They are run by two sepaerate agencies.  The Forest Service by the USDA and the Park Service by The Department of the InteriorPr0carbine (talk) 18:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the stub category as well as expanded the article Marcia Wright (talk) 13:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:National Bingo Night (Australian game show)

message: Can someone reproduce here, the disclaimer show at the beginning of the closing credits?
And can someone explain it. Thanks - Joshua Hrouda  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.130.36.190 (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimer in credits 

message: I don't really think the 'one away' controversy is a controversy, as you can still be one away with 4 Os (the rules of bingo state you need 5 numbers in a row in any direction to win)121.219.239.103 08:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was still possible to get bingo. I'll do some work there. (The home viewer cards show Ep 4, Red Card needs a diagonal running from left to right) -- Whiteandnerdy111 19:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Ok, it's not being one away with 4 Os. It's being one away after 3 Os and a G was called.
As of tonight (26/11/2007) A Current Affair have made another report about this show. They claimed that they used camera cuts to make certain balls appear instead of others, and some other stuff. Also Channel 7 banned that No Bingo guy from appearing on ABC's The Chaser.
I sure hope some of you other wikipals were watching more dedicatedly.Razorthe6249th (talk) 08:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The night after the final, Tanny was on Today Tonight about rigging allegations. -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 06:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy section
Talk:Domingo Liotta

message: Answer: There is a terrible misconception regarding this topic. The Jarvik artificial heart was implanted in 1982, 13 years after the events of Houston, Texas. On April 4, 1969, at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital in Houston, a patient named Haskell Karp, lived for sixty-four hours with the artificial heart designed by Dr Domingo Liotta and implated by Dr Denton Cooley, until a human heart was available for transplant. This was the FIRST CLINICAL USE IN HUMANS. Dr Liotta original works on this topic and published in scientific journals are dated from 1958. Dr Jarvik was probably at elementary school at that time.
http://www.texasheartinstitute.org/Research/Devices/liotta.cfm
http://americanhistory.si.edu/exhibitions/small_exhibition.cfm?key=1267&exkey=143&pagekey=216
http://fdliotta.org/curriculum.htm
05:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi
Sorry to have to mention this, but we don't put brackets round dates in articles anymore. I have removed them from the article
Thanks--Chaosdruid (talk) 06:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  brackets round dates removed 
Talk:Cairbre Nia Fer

message: Trí meicc Rosa Rúaid in rig
Gabsat in tír buidnib sel;
Find i n-Álind, Ailill i Cruaich,
Caipre thuaid i Temair Breg.
In n-oen-fecht comterbtis a ngnim
A triar brathar im cach gleó,
Ba crithail oen-mucci leo.
Batar 'n-a tri n-uathnib air
Im a trilchaib, buan in balc;
Is bein in-a conhgaib catha
A fochera in tress macc.
The three sons of Rosa Rúaid the king -
They held the land by battalions awhile,
Find in Alend, Ailill in Cruaich,
Cairpre in the north in Temair Breg.
Together they used to perform their deed [of arms]
The three brothers, in every strife;
Together they used to give their battle;
One pig's litter [born] was theirs    [wolf dogs]
They were three pillars of gold
About their hills, abiding their strength,
It is a gap in their grasp of battle,
Since the third son has fallen. The three ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.125.7.55 (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trí meicc Rosa Rúaid in rig
Talk:Deichtine

message: I noticed that this article is marked as belonging to several categories for given names: :Category:Irish feminine given names, :Category:Irish-language given names, :Category:Feminine given names, :Category:Gaelic-language given names, :Category:Irish-language feminine given names.
While Diechtine is an Irish name, the article is about a mythological figure rather than the name. Would removing these category references make sense? Shenl88 (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscategorized under given names categories?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cobi

message: These comments are general, but important in that sense so I thought I'd leave them here. They couldn't be made due to the RfA being suspended.
:in response to 
::As I submitted above it's not missing the forest for the trees, to abuse your metaphor it's protecting the forest from being burned down. What it really does is align our standards with what's really important. And we wouldn't need such protection from vandals (at least it would become drastically less important) if we had a stable version system implemented properly. In the end it still all boils down to the only thing we are here for is to write an encyclopedia. Finally sneaky vandalism is much more costly, and that can only be properly combatted by someone that is working on the material of the article. - Taxman Talk 22:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anciliary comments
Talk:Dáire mac Fiachna

message: If Dáire is related to Conchobar, he would be a great grandson: Dáire mac Fiachna mac Feidhilm Naoichrothaigh iníon Chonchobair. Correct? Plausible? Marcas.oduinn (talk) 05:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry
Talk:AN/APG-65 radar family

message: The CF-18 pages says the CF-18s have been upgraded from the APG-65 to the APG-73, and contradics this article.
Kitplane01 05:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You should have kept reading. This article also says that Canada uses the APG-73. However, no where does the article state that Canada uses one type over the other. It would be good to find a source that gives the service dates of each type. - BillCJ 05:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

text: * Canada finished their CF-18 Phase 1 upgrade in 2006, so APG-73 radars should have replaced all the -65s.  It's outdated info, not contradictory, imo. -Fnlayson 06:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[CF-18 Hornet|CF-18]]
Talk:The All-New Super Friends Hour

message: Is there a source for the "developed by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons" reference in the sidebar? I couldn't find any reference on google that didn't link back here.
Moore would have been 23/24 when this came out, before he started working on Judge Dredd, before he'd done anything except some illustrations for NME. I suspect this is meant as a joke.
Mattcolville (talk) 05:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Moore & Dave Gibbons
Talk:The Super Powers Team: Galactic Guardians

message: It's strange to say that this show's lineup is more authentic when there is a strong emphasys on Firestorm (who was one of the less canonic JLA members at the time) and on Cyborg (who was never a member at all). 
For that matter, El Dorado and Samurai were never JLA members either.  I believe they don't even exist in comics. Luis Dantas (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyborg as an "authentic" member
Talk:Cheekha Dar

message: The spelling in the article title is Cheekha Dar, but in the info box it's Cheekah Dar (note the placing of the h). What is the usual spelling? Also, I came to this page following a link to the "unknown peak" from the Iraq article. Can anyone clarify where this name comes from?
--Tracerbullet11 (talk) 08:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and name "unknown peak" 

message: The usual term for "black tent" in Kurdish would be Dewarî Reš (Dewari Resh), as in the name of the Kurdish movie Bukî Jêr Dewarî Reš (The Bride of the Black Tent).  There are words for black in Kurdish other than resh, namely: çepel, gemar, kirêt, mujikî, qilêr, and tarî.  None of these seem to be closely related to Cheekah Dar.  Maybe Chepel Dewari in reverse word order?  Not likely. Can someone find the report of Ginge Fullen that is mentioned in the article and at "Arabia and Mideast Ultra-Prominence" - peaklist.org? --Bejnar (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Tent

message: I don't think cheekhe dare means black tent. Arefdiako (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of mountain 

message: This mountain is higher than 3611m
Its high about 3625m Arefdiako (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  high
Talk:Black Angel (1946 film)

message: The sequence after Bennett enters spoiled queen's Marvis apartment, not noticing, or finding, Marty, and Marty, after that, escaping (in his stupor) the notice of actually arriving housemaid (who had seen Bennett, but not Marty - ?) seems to be highly irreal. Or BS. Or what should one say. --2001:A61:5DD:D01:C5E7:4688:372E:4C12 (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plotholes
Talk:Black sigatoka

message: Both articles are stubs, a merge may be wise at this stage. Comments? Million_Moments 06:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments after one month, merge compleated.Million_Moments 17:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Njesuthi

message: The Mafadi also claims to be the highest in South Africa. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  highest of [[South Africa]] 

message: As not highest of range or region has been lowered to mid importance for WikiProject Mountains.Marqaz (talk) 22:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Anurida maritima

message: you need to post the life cycle! asap!
I need it for a project but yall are not providing it.
Email me please if you find anything 
mandahead2024@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.180.84.208 (talk) 02:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Qurnat as Sawda'

message: Should the title of this article be Qurnat as Sawda' or Qurnat as Sawdā or maybe Qurnat as Sawdā' ? The article URL and the text/infobox conflict. I see some variation in various language wikis as well. jengod (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  question abt article title
Talk:Hell's Bells: The Dangers of Rock 'N' Roll

message: The writeup says that they talk about backmasking, but even calling it that implies an intention that is still in dispute. E.g. the Wikipedia definition of backmasking says "Backmasking is a deliberate process, whereas a message found through phonetic reversal may be unintentional". The documentary talks about hidden audible messages but to call them backmasking means a deliberate process which is (seemingly) in dispute because the artists deny it. It's probably better to call this "perceived hidden messages in songs" or something more neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.78.240.7 (talk) 02:53, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backmasking? 

message: The text "Its views do not represent the conventional Christian view on metal music." should not be there. Clearly the author enjoys Christian metal music (there was previously a link to 'List of Christian Metal Bands') and is trying to make this video look like it espouses a fringe view, but since the video is about secular bands and does not focus on Christian bands, it is irrelevant. 
Not only that, it is inaccurate. The 'conventional' view among many Christians is certainly anti-metal (secular or no). That view may have changed over the past 30 years, but in that case, a pro-metal view is unconventional.
It would be better (if one is really that worried that somebody is going to be misled about the nature of Christian perspectives on music) to have a few sentences explaining that although this video represents a portion of the Christian viewpoint on music, there are many other views as reflected by a thriving Christian metal scene.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.177.152 (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conventional Christian View
Talk:Legal status of Hawaii/Archive 1

message: Laualoha:Sorry, but I had to take this out:
"The legal status of Hawai'i is not a major dispute.  Further, this issue is not recognized or discussed by the majority of American and Hawaiian citizens. The controversy in Hawai'i resembles in many ways the same academic debate being argued by several other fringe groups in the United States including the Texan and Alaskan Independence Movements." 
Laualoha:Uh, I really donʻt want to dis anybodyʻs contribution, but I have to say that I really feel that the objective of Wikipedia is to provide information.  If youʻre a little biased, I can accept that: provide information to show what people donʻt know yet.  But please donʻt say things like "The legal status of Hawai'i is not a major dispute", when you know very well that there are whole groups, and tons of literature, dedicated to the question of legality!
The above statement is an argument, not information, and contains (I really hate to say this, but I gotta) several logical fallacies (please donʻt make me go into them one by one!)  I have nothing against people having points of view I donʻt agree with, even if theyʻre loud about them.  But it wouldnʻt be very nice if I was to make an argument like this coming from the opposite point of view (i.e."The current illegal status of Hawai'i is not a major dispute.  Not a single current sovereign nation disputes the illegality of American "ownership" of Hawai'i....",etc.), would it? It would be just as valid, but would drive you to correct it and therefore waste your time.  I really think we need to avoid doing this to each other.
If you want to make a point, please give information that will enlighten people to whatever you want them to understand.  Aloha, Laualoha 14:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jere:I think the point can probably be stated in a more NPOV manner - the essence being that as a matter of international law and jurisprudence for over 100 years, the argument is settled.  You can't make the inverse claim, because the Republic of Hawaii was internationally recognized, and the annexation in 1898 was also internationally recognized (with the U.S. taking up the treaty obligations/rights/responsibilites post-annexation).  I'll try to insert something back in that has a less argumentative tone. --JereKrischel 16:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Food Network Challenge

message: Looking at the massive list at Food Network, it seems like the current competition format might result in a HUGE page if we were to go through and fill in all of the details for every episode back to the first.  Any ideas for tightening up the format and anyone want to tackle the task of listing all of the competitions? AnmaFinotera 06:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competition/Episode List 

message: Oppose Chef is known for his culinary skill outside of being host of the Challenge.  Merging to that article, in essence, makes the assumption that he is only known for that.  SpikeJones (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging chef into this article 

message: The episode list for this show is woefully out of date. I tried IMDB, but that did not have the most recent episodes listed, and the Food Network page for the show listings here did not have them in airing order, just in production order which isn't how episodes are usually listed on Wikipedia articles. If anyone can find a better source that would be great. Cat-five - talk 07:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode list woefully out of date 

message: Just wanted to note here that I added the information on her number of competitions, number of wins, and her having the most wins since that's all been mentioned in the show. I've been unable to find a text source to use as a cite but will keep trying since that probably would be cited. Notability is iffy despite being on this one show so much (she isn't regularly on any other FN shows) so I don't think it should be a seperate article for her yet, just a general note like some of the other listed chefs on that list have. Cat-five - talk 07:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bronwen Weber
Talk:Elizabeth Donnelly

message: No references, much of this should be edited if untrue...JJJ999 06:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Home Sweet Homicide

message: I believe the IMDB entry is in error -- note that both the pictured lobby card and the original novel don't have the comma in the title after the word "Home".  I don't have a copy of the film, but I do have a copy of the novel for verification, and the lobby card seems fairly clear. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe
Talk:Unimodal function

message: In probability and statistics, a "unimodal probability distribution" is a probability distribution whose probability density function is a unimodal function, or more generally, (...) (this allows for the possibility of a non-zero probability for x=m).
I don't understand. The second definition (more general) accepts P[x=m] > 0. This seems to imply that the first one does not. Then, as I understand it, the first definition only accepts as "unimodal probability distribution" a probability distribution whose pdf is a unimodal function of mode m, with P[x=m] = 0, that is, pdf(m)=0. Such a pdf can't be unimodal with mode m. And thus the first definition rejects every probability distribution of being unimodal and thus defines an empty concept...--OlivierMiR (talk) 18:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zero probability for x=m possible? 

message: Feller says that unimodal distribution is a distribution function that is convex up to the mode and concave beyond it. Thus it may have density taking maximal values on an interval (say uniform distribution on [0,1]). In this case all points in [0,1] are local maxima (or there aren't any, if we consider strict 'peaks' only). Therefore I suggest a more general definition of a unimodal function: a function whose local maxima make up an interval.
Moreover, it might be worth replacing '(this allows for the possibility of a non-zero probability for x=m)' with '(in this case the distribution may have density everywhere except, possibly, m; this allows for the possibility of a non-zero probability for x=m)'
Matumba (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local maxima 

message: I removed Pascal's triangle as an example since it does not follow the strict definition given here. The definition talks about "monotonically increasing for x ≤ m and monotonically decreasing for x ≥ m". In Pascal's triangle it is "monotonically non-decreasing for x ≤ m and monotonically non-increasing for x ≥ m", that is, a value can repeat. Specifically, in the page Pascal's triangle one can see the 3rd line has 3 twice. The value is not increasing or decreasing. What one can do is add a weaker form for which it applies. I might do that, but I want to check first. For now I removed the misleading example. --Muhandes (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pascal's triangle]] 

message: Rather than try to rewrite both this page and unimodal distribution I wrote unimodal and redirected there. I hope this is better solution. If not you are free to revert. --Muhandes (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[unimodal]]