lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spacing

message: Anyone know the first use in fiction?
:I seem to remember something in some work from the "Golden Age" of Science Fiction (if I recall correctly) where a number of people have to transfer from one space ship to another without the benefit of EVA suits. Sorry I can't remember the title, but I do recall that after the jump the only lasting symptom was "a bad case of sunburn". Planish 19:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: Talk:Spacing – Spacing → I'm not sure, perhaps vacuum exposure – I have a hard time believing spacing is the term used for this, unless perhaps it was used in some science fiction show or such. Nothing linking to the page intends this as the target. Perhaps the page could then be expanded to include more information on the effects of exposure to a vacuum, and a "Vacuum exposure in fiction" section could document some of the various portrayals. If someone has a better idea, please suggest it. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support as nominator. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support as nominator. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: I've reverted the move (please start a discussion, WP:RM). There appears to be no rational with substance as to why this article needs to be disambiguated, unless there's another article called spacing? The dab link seems to cover the other pages (titled "space") well, in my opinion. Matthew 16:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A "billion" times more common?
Talk:Kansas State Capitol

message: It looks like the capital link needs to be updated.--Biggie 04:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: or do you mean Capitol ??? CAPITAL IS THIS !!! 136.35.13.50 (talk) 20:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: I changed the city's name to Google Ref just look in the news any news you frken faggs if you don't know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.46.177 (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed city's name

message: .
Generating discussion - what is the official name of the capitol building? Various sources say either "Capitol Building," or "Statehouse," and some say both. Please comment on reliability/authority of any cited sources. Thanks, Alphachimera (talk) 16:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Kansas State Capitol" is the official mailing address name, as seen at the bottom of http://www.kslegislature.org. Ryan2845 (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  One can also review news sources to confirm. Viriditas (talk) 13:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, see: (http://www.treanorarchitects.com/static/Statehouse/index.html) and (http://www.kansascity.com/2011/01/28/2617723/kansas-marks-150th-with-low-key.html) and (http://www.da.ks.gov/fm/buildings/capitol/information/Default.htm) and (http://kansas150slk.blogspot.com/2010/08/kansas-state-capitol.html). I'm comfortable leaving the page as Kansas State Capitol--for the time being--based on Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. But as a Native Kansan, I can tell you that it's the Statehouse. The House Bill that authorized construction called it the Statehouse. The state employee in charge of renovations is called the Statehouse Architect. Room numbers in the building start with SH. It's maddening not to have a verifiable "source" for this! Alphachimera (talk) 01:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Name

message: Would someone be willing to post a picture with the new dome color, since the Capitol renovation is done? I do not live in Topeka, so it'd be hard for me to get a picture. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 19:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Capitol Dome color 
Talk:A History of Britain (TV series)

message: a Note that this a history of Britain not the British Isles. Both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland are not part of Britain and, therefore, should not be included in the "Hstory of Britain". Although Northen Irish people are often refered to as being British, they are not: check any UK passport where it explictly states that it is a passport for Great Britain and Northern Ireland. -Unsigned comment from user:86.42.77.140 
Actually Simon Schama made it pretty clear that he meant Ireland to be included.I remeber him saying something about how the earliest records used "Britannia" in this sense. It's made especially clear at the end of the episode with William and Mary and the Battle of the Boyne which had a speech something like "If this was a history of England that would be the end of the story but as it is a history Britain it is just the start," and playing out with clips from the Northern Ireland troublesA Geek Tragedy 13:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have restructured and expanded this article. The new infobox was primarily designed for nature documentaries, but it works just as well for any other. If I feel up to it, I may embark on writing original episode summaries of equal length. (See those within Life on Earth or any of David Attenborough's 'Life' series articles for examples (I wrote all of those summaries except for Life in the Freezer, which I tidied and expanded). However, history is not my strongest subject and I would want to be certain that I could do all the programmes justice before I provide any for this article. Chris 42 15:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded article 

message: Clean up the sound quality 86.3.118.151 (talk) 12:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The background sound overpowers the excellent commentary, rendering it almost unwatchable sadly. I’m giving up
Talk:Rakata

message: The passage "It is one of three islands that formed the volcano Krakatoa, the others being Danan and Perboewatan." should be revised: "It is one of three VOLCANOES that formed the ISLAND of Krakatoa, ..." The islands were Krakatoa, Lang (or "Long"; Indonesian- Rakata Kecil), and Verlaten ("Forsaken"; Indo.- Sertung). All three islands are still extant- Lang and Verlaten actually grew in size from falling debris in 1883. The southern half of Rakata is what remains of the main island of Krakatoa.
-source is any book or map of Krakatoa CFLeon 05:08, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem solved in rewriting of entry. CFLeon 23:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: islands/volcanoes

message: The article includes the puzzling sentence "Because the words Rakata and Krakatau are the same in Indonesian, both names are used interchangeably, leading to confusion in languages which distinguish between the two words." "Rakata" and "Krakatau" are quite clearly NOT the same in Indonesian - in the Indonesian-language version of the article they both occur separately, and all the letters in them occur in Indonesian. Maybe they are used interchangeably in Indonesian to mean both the volcanic cone and the whole island - but that is not what the sentence says. Perhaps it should simply read "Rakata and Krakatau are used interchangeably in Indonesian, leading to confusion in languages which distinguish between the two words." But further confusion is caused by the next sentence, which reads "In geological usage, Krakatau is the island and Rakata is the main volcanic cone on that island." This suggests that the distinction is not in fact between Indonesian and other languages, but between geological and non-geological usage - i.e. even Indonesian geologists use "Krakatau" for the island and "Rakata" for the volcanic cone. In short, this whole section is a mess!213.127.210.95 (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rakata/Krakatau
Category talk:Upcoming films

message: How does one decide if the film is an upcoming one when it is released at a festival but has not opened in theatres? An example Surveillance (2008 film) or Two Lovers (film)--leandros (talk) 12:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A film which has only been released at a festival but not in cinemas is considered upcoming. Once a film has opened to the general public at cinemas in any country, it is no longer upcoming. - kollision (talk) 11:40, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Upcoming or not?

message: Is there anyway I can edit out the Bollywood films from the list? There seems to a disproportionately large number of Bollywood films in there. I do not mean remove the Bollywood films. I am just wondering if there is a filter by which I can list down all upcoming films other than those made in Bollywood.
:A :Category:Upcoming Bollywood films would do the trick. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bollywood Films 

message: Why in the world is the 1938 film version of the chrismas carol listed here? I can't seem to remove it from the list.--Paleface Jack (talk) 01:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1938 Christmas Carol?! 

message: Should one of "Template:Category diffuse" or "Template:All included" be used for this category? --Julthep (talk) 06:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: All Included, this category should not be diffused as the subcategories are not unique. BOVINEBOY2008 14:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, :Template:All included has been inserted. --Julthep (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Category diffuse" or "All included" ?
Talk:Nicholas McLeod

message: One would hope to find the books this man wrote in the Catalogue of the British Library, but no such luck. Verify or delete. Pilatus 05:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This Google Books search "N McLeod" Japan produces as the first hit A Collector's Guide to Books on Japan in English: A Select List of Over 2500 Titles by Jozef Rogala, pub. Routledge (UK), Nov 2000, . It has a biography and bibliography for N McLeod, confirming the details (except that he was called Nicholas, not Norman). Tearlach 05:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Illustrations to the Epitome of the ancient history of Japan are in the Scottish National Library, in the Rare Book Collection. Might spend an afternoon in there. Pilatus 23:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible hoax
Talk:Pao cai

message: How is the photo? Can pao cai also include carrot, as in the photo? Badagnani 05:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: What are the ingredients? Does it include vinegar? Salt? I believe it also includes a pinch of sugar as well. Badagnani 05:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ingredients

message: Is it commercially available? If so, in which form(s)? Badagnani 05:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial availability

message: On the Food Network, an American sauerkraut manufacturer stated that the Chinese invented sauerkraut; he said that during the building of the Great Wall, they wanted to supplement their rice diet, so they preserved cabbages in large jars with wine, which created the necessary fermentation. Is this correct? Badagnani (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: Yes, I can confirm this. 泡菜 is Korean Hanja for Kimchi.----User:DaeHanMinGuk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.53.64.152 (talk) 08:07, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can add a citation if someone would like to work it into the article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352618115000670JenniferNM (talk) 09:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  @Above Comment 

message: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0956713520300906
This article has a scientist that mostly cites their own work throughout the article. The claim that there is  2013 work from Rao Yu is not cited in the works cited portion. When I looked him up in the Science Direct Menu, for 2013 articles of that nature, his name does not associate with any articles about Pao Cai origins being in the Shang Dynasty: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Rao+Y%5BAuthor%5D&filter=years.2013-2013
Failing to cite yourself is quite the oversight. And making up a citation on top of that and no one catching you is quite a thing, isn't it?
The citation, therefore, is a lie. And probably should be removed. Check the article's citations. If the other articles site this person, then it doesn't work.
I checked their claim also for the 2020 article, and it's not in the 2020 article. The person is a microbiologist and unless working under an archaeologist isn't likely the best person to make such a claim.
I checked the other two articles and neither of them say ANYTHING about Shang Dynasty. The citation is made up and/or rotten. Please correct accordingly.
--KimYunmi (talk) 23:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shang Dynasty doesn't work out?

message: Currently the first picture shown in this article is Taiwanese pao cai. Here in Taiwan, what we call pao cai usually refers to cabbage marinated in vinegar and sugar. It's not fermented at all. C9mVio9JRy (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not have to be fermented
Talk:Kbkg wz. 1960

message: While the article says that the weapon (supposedly) includes grenade launcher, there is no grenade launcher on the picture, which is quite misleading. (Igny 17:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes there is. It's on the end of the barrel.CynicalMe 17:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grenade launcher?
Talk:Gombak District

message: moved some of the wierder stuff here
:== Prominent Figures ==
:Razak Kaliluddin - Malaysia's leading Galus-Galus chicken breeder.
:== Famous Gathering Areas ==
:1. Pantai Murni Reestaurant, Pinggiran Batu Caves. Famous for its soup.
:2. Asam Pedas Restaurant, Taman Seri Gombak.
:3. Zabidi's house. This is the place where one of Malaysia's famous movie, Pertentangan was shot in :1984.
__earth 05:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Hulu Kelang = Ulu Klang? Reindra (talk) 01:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Chongkian (talk) 03:39, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Klang 

message: Batu Caves in the "MPS area included" list should point to the Batu Caves areas covered by the Selayang Municiple Council and not linking to the Batu Caves temple.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariefamron (talk • contribs) 11:25, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batu Caves in the "MPS area included" list  
Talk:Arturo Santos

message: Can someone provide sources for this ? He shows up on some webpages related to the miracle at Fatima, but with less detail than is present here. A nice NPOV bio-stub would probably be better than what is present here. Megapixie 05:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone, cleanup, verify

message: In that english language book the name is wrongly spelled. As you can read in the 1ts volume of Sister Lúcia Memoirs the man´s name was Artur dos Santos. Even looks like anti-portuguese xenophobia the attempt to write is name in spanish. User:Mistico
Mistico, do you have a page number?  I have the book, and would like to check it out.  At first glance, I locate on page 72 a reference to "the Administrator", but Lucia does not name him there. If Jaki and the others are wrong about the spelling of the name, we want to correct it. Do you have a copy of the book in Portuguese?  pat8722 00:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Artur dos Santos
Talk:Lacustrine

message: this disambiguation page is not a good one.  it may need to become a single topic, especially in light of the google hit count !
we could have subdivisions of discussion for geology , ecology (including fish !)...what do others think?? Anlace 21:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea. Be bold and have at 'er :-) — Dave 22:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Student-led school change

message: I've redirected this to Student activism.  Two reasons:
# The article as it stood had been a bunch of advocacy and original research for several months, and was totally unencyclopedic. 
# Poking around online finds very little use of this term; Wikipedia and its mirrors were most of the top search results. This makes it look like this is a little-used term for what is more widely called "student activism" - we shouldn't be using obscure jargon. CDC (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:James V. McConnell

message: Merging "J. V. McConnell" into this article was suggested back in October; any reason why this hasn't been done? (OK to "be bold"?) RJCraig 05:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody has gotten around to it.  Go for it.  -- Dominus 04:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've tried; this is my first attempt at a merge, so comments appreciated! A question, though: Should we keep all the stub notices? RJCraig 10:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think it would be better to keep them until the article is expanded at least a little bit.--Carabinieri 13:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hunting/Archive 1

message: I'm sure most people know what "hunting" is, but the article still needs an introductory paragraph containing a definition. Before 198.234.216.213's vandalism, such a paragraph was in place. Any reason it was removed?
TaintedMustard 09:45, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I do not think that this article presents the controversial issue of sport hunting in an unbiased manner; it is clearly biased towards the pro-hunting viewpoint. As a few examples, the discussion of fox hunting under "United Kingdom" states, "Some animal rights supporters feel it causes suffering to the fox and is both cruel and unnecessary, but no cruelty evidence was forthcoming when the legislation was drawn up. " and "Some hunting activists have declared their intention to break the law and continue hunting with hounds, and others are 'hunting within the law' and thereby showing the law to be flawed, illogical and unenforcable." which clearly shows that the author is not unbiased on this very controversial issue.
In order to make this article neutral, opinions on hunting either need to be removed, or a true accounting of both sides should be presented. The article should have links to both pro and anti-hunting groups.
--crisw 04:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality of this article
Talk:Tropical Storm Zeta (2005)

message: Tropical Storm Zeta also extended the record number of storms to form in the 2005 season to twenty-eight, seven more than the previous record held by the 1933 season - the 1933 season was revised from 21 to 20 storms (as given in the 1933 season entry) so that should be 8 more (altho some storms could have easily been missed in 1933). (Also note that one of the 28 storms was added in postseason analysis so, as stated earlier in the Zeta entry, there were only 27 storm names in 2005 altho there were 28 "named storms", which is probably worth a brief explanation. To further complicate things, that 28th storm was a subtropical storm, which weren't named until recently.)
96.88.198.77 (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: belatedly. Drdpw (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of storms 

message: Hi. Can we make the article 20 KB so we don't need to continue to merge it? --WesternAtlanticCentral (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Tears in rain monologue

message: The phrase "The place named "Tannhäuser Gate" (also written "Tannhauser Gate" and "Tanhauser Gate") is not explained in the film" is correct. We do not know if it is a physical place-name because it could be a constellation, or some other stellar location, particularly since it follows the "attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion" sentence. We don't know what it represents so let us not assume it is a physical place. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Place named" is correct "placed-name" is not. 

message: Hello. Yesterday, in three or four hours of work, not more, I found a hidden message there is in the Tears in Rain soliloquy, a message that anyone reading the process of coming up with it will admit without doubt that is in all actuality there, not pareidolic or anything as if seeing faces in a cloud.
The message has appeared there either via chance or via the magic of nature, each person will have his explanation. But no person will think there is reasonable doubt, because the process of finding the message automatically provides information that the message is there, in a meta-recursive game of sorts.
Anyone explaining this hidden message in any Blade Runner board forum would instantly become the king of said forum, but I would rather write the message here in Wikipedia, but I do not desire to have it deleted.
Is it possible to get to talk to some people responsible in here for the contents, so that I get a confirmation or a denial to post the message (once explained to said person) and then post it safely if that were to be the case, with no deletion fear?
Best regards. CJRP1979 (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please review the 'welcome' template I've added to your user talk page. You will see that content on Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sourcing. Feel free to state what you believe this hidden message to be, but know that for it to be noted in the article, it should have some relevance, and it should also be supported by some sourcing. - wolf 10:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden message in the Tears in Rain soliloquy, created by nature or extreme unlikelihood. 

message: Why was my addition to the noteworthy references section removed as 'trivia?' It was similar to the already present entries in that section and was completely noteworthy, given that it referred to a song, the lyrics of which are almost entirely composed of the words from the Tears in Rain soliloquy. 89.127.24.33 (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: reverted it. Maybe because the reference was a primary source? See WP:PSTS. I restored the listing and referenced the magazine Spin, a secondary source, instead. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteworthy References
Talk:WPXT

message: I changed the reference to "channel 6" to refer to "WCSH", since nowhere in the article is it made clear that WCSH broadcasts on channel 6.  Those of us in Maine, who watch the stations, know, of course, but the purpose of the article is not just for those who already know about the topics. DLCinMaine 06:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This no longer exists the same channel was replaced by Maines CW the same thing as WMTW except for that ABC shows are replaced by the CW shows due to copyright reasons  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjqx (talk • contribs) 18:27, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer exists
Talk:Sandra Dodd

message: I've restored this per request of the user who first wrote it.  I'll see if I can bring this up to standards in the meantime.  Bear with me, OK?  :) - Lucky 6.9 06:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first section could be reworked a bit and added at an appropriate place in the article; I'd hate to introduce error since I'm completely unfamiliar with the topic.
The quotes section is way too long for an article of this length.  I'd say 3 quotes, tops.
The conferences setion: This isn't her calendar or a promotional site; her upcoming engagements don't belong here.JordeeBec 02:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved material 

message: Does anyone working on this page know how to clearly define "radical unschooling" and differentiate it from other sorts of unschooling? The unschooling article needs someone knowledgeable about the subject to add a section about it. 
It might also be a good idea to add a definition of the term on this page. Amillion 05:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radical Unschooling 

message: Should this be noted?  Birth date adds up though not sure if a better citation is needed.
http://sandradodd.com/bowie Good enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.130.60 (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Author of first American David Bowie fan letter