Talk:Union County Magnet High School

message: *Union County Magnet High School
**Equally pointless.  -- Zoe
** Why? It's a moderately informative article about an educational institution. It could become very useful for someone looking for a school in the Scotch Plains, NJ area, when the article has grown a bit. -- Oliver P. 03:58 Mar 7, 2003 (UTC)
** A great article. Susan Mason
** the DuPont Manual Magnet High School page has been in existence for nearly a year, how come that wasnt put up for deletion? Iammaxus
:
*Note:  I am adding this here from old VfD archives.. Outcome was that article was kept.--Milowent • talkblp-r 18:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2003 deletion debate

message: Why has all information regarding classes, the ADDA test, AP courses, college credits, the mandatory technology courses, stark electives, etc. been removed from this article?  I see it existed in the past, but for some reason has been removed.
This article simply reads like-
Intro (with summary of mission statement),
Awards,
Extracurriculars,
Building,
Legal Disputes,
Where is the discussion about the school's vocational status, mandatory classes, engineering and technology focus, etc.?  I can't believe there's a discussion about the facade of the building but not about the actual quality of education. --74.105.51.151 (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Info about school philosophy and classes

message: The extracurriculars section seems very lengthy, taking up more space than any other part of the article.  There is information on clubs that appear to have existed for only a year that is no longer relevant.
Also, the only reference for this sort of information would be from students, which are not technically legitimate references.  There is no real way of finding references for the majority of this extracurricular information, except for some of the few newsworthy events, such as the Relay for Life. --74.105.51.151 (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Extracurricular Activities needs cleaning up

message: For those of you who wrote the section on UCMHS's legal dispute, I hate to tell you, but it is incredibly one-sided. The writing is slated in UCMHS's favor. It needs a re-write; it makes it seem as if the lawsuits were incredibly frivulous and the districts who were suing were comprised of evil, greedy pigs. Since I highly doubt that this is the case, the section, if not the whole article, needs a re-write. Heavy Metal Cellisttalkcontribs
As the person who wrote that section, yes, it is quite biassed. That section was written last-minute to show how the MHS was worthy of an article. I had hoped that somebody would come through and make it less POV. Knock yourself out. REwhite 18:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as requested, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Start on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Mid on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This reads like a B article but it needs to reference its claims. It could also use work on its neutrality. Adam McCormick 07:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007 

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I have assessed this article as C-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* The article needs inline citations
* The article needs references
shirulashem (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments