lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Symphony No. 4 (Mendelssohn)

message: The revisions he was working on for this symphony, late in his life, have been edited into performable form and recorded twice now- room for this in the article? They affect mostly matters of orchestration but are not subtle! Schissel | Sound the Note! 18:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised version 

message: The recording on the main page has the 3rd and 4th movements switched. Asriel (talk) 10:15, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct order is now restored on commons. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording 

message: According to John Michael Cooper Cooper, John Michael. 2003. Mendelssohn's 'Italian' Symphony. New York: Oxford University Pressthe epithet 'Italian' is not Mendelssohn's own, he never included this on any of his symphonies nor did he publicly or privately refer to Op.90 as 'Italian'.
(Jesse Green (talk) 21:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Italian' Epithet Mendelssohn's Own?
Talk:Doktor Faust

message: The story of Busoni's composition of this opera is rich and interesting. At some point we should try to build a section describing his efforts. Personally I have too much else on my plate right now. Maybe I could try to start something later on, but perhaps someone else could get to it sooner? --Robert.Allen (talk) 17:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition history
Talk:Indian Fantasy

message: Recently, an anon added the following: "The piece was premiered in 1915 by Stokowski and the Philadelphia Orchestra. Busoni himself played the piano."  This conflicts with the information earlier in the article that the premiere was in Zurich in 1916.  Which is correct?  Cheers.DavidRF (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premiere Info
Talk:Yank, the Army Weekly

message: :Image:YANKmagazinecover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
:Do these fair use templates ever get removed?  All three images on this page have fair use rationales on the Commons, and the file to which this refers no longer exists.  Hzoi (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:YANKmagazinecover.jpg

message: McGurn and White give a different account of what articles the Army command objected to. White says the disapproved articles were: 1) a description of pay raises for soldiers that some felt gave the impression soldiers just wanted money, 2) An article on hand to hand combat techniques that was felt to be too graphic, 3) a humorous account of a soldier-reporters visit with Eleanor Roosevelt that the command felt was disrespectful. McGurn says the offending articles were: 1) an article calling for a second front in Europe in 1942 and 2) articles disrespectful of Hollywood stars claiming to support the troops.
Marfinan (talk) 03:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for removing Egbert White 

message: The Yank editor Joe McCarthy is not the same man who became a Senator from Wisconsin and alarmed the nation with warnings of Communist infiltrators in the government.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marfinan (talk • contribs) 18:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe a snippet page or differentiation page can be made so that fact can be shown? Also, where did the name come from? Is it the origin or a reference to the use of the word as masturbate? 173.128.176.163 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Also, where did the name come from? Is it the origin or a reference to the use of the word as masturbate?" Come on.  Use your head.  It's the common definition of Yank, like the one that appears on the Yank disambiguation page.  As in "The Yanks are coming," from the chorus of Over There.  Hzoi (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't hotlink Joe McCarthy
Talk:Latin American poetry

message: See headline: this article could be much improved.  --Jbmurray 06:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs much improvement 

message: Smock, Frederick, ed. The American Voice Anthology of Poetry. University Press of Kentucky, 1998. http://0-www.jstor.org.dewey2.library.denison.edu/stable/j.ctt130hq4b.
Patell, Cyrus R.K. "Hispanic American Poetry." In Encyclopedia of American Poetry: The Twentieth Century, edited by Eric L. Haralson. Routledge, 2001. http://0-search.credoreference.com.dewey2.library.denison.edu/content/entry/routampoetry/hispanic_american_poetry/0
Taylor, Ordner. "Latin American Literature." In Africa and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History, edited by Richard M. Juang, and Noelle Anne Morrissette. ABC-CLIO, 2008. http://0-search.credoreference.com.dewey2.library.denison.edu/content/entry/abcafatrle/latin_american_literature/0
KIRKPATRICK, G. "Spanish America, Poetry of." In The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, edited by Roland Green, Stephen Cushman, and Clare Cavanagh. Princeton University Press, 2012. http://0-search.credoreference.com.dewey2.library.denison.edu/content/entry/prpoetry/spanish_america_poetry_of/0
Windyrmt (talk) 00:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Preliminary Sources for Completion of this Article

message: Latin American poetry is the poetry of Latin America, mostly but not entirely written in Spanish or Portuguese. The unification of Indigenous and imperial cultures produced a unique and extraordinary body of literature in this region. Later with the introduction of African slaves to the new world, African traditions greatly influenced Latin American poetry. Many great works of poetry were written in the colonial and pre-colonial time periods, but it was in the 1960s that the world began to notice the poetry of Latin America. Through the modernismo movement, and the international success of Latin American authors, poetry from this region became increasingly influential. Windyrmt (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Improvement 

message: Overall I think this is a really good article. I did notice that you switch between present and past tense when describing events, so go through and make sure you keep it consistent. There are also a few segments that have strange wording, mostly under the 20th century section. There is a sentence that starts "All this (1910 and 1940)" which does not seem complete. I just think you need to go over/complete this section as a whole. Also, the summary at the beginning mentions how Latin American Poetry did not gain much recognition until the 1960s, and I think later on in the article you could go more in depth on how that happened/what authors/works spurred that on. It also might be interesting to talk about the types of poetry a little more (if you can find information) such as sonnets, limericks, haikus, free verse, etc, and discuss the themes of each and how those themes shifted. Snoakes (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Improvement
Talk:Gyula Cseszneky

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: There is no indication for anybody being proclaimed Grand Voivode of Macedonia in any bibliography about Macedonia. I can only guess that what is mentioned here is plainly wrong or a hoax and repeated over the internet. 
The supporting references in the article are:
*Regnal chronologies: Macedonia - certainly not proper source - the author says " I am an amateur historian" and mentions Aug-Sept 1943
*World Statesmen: Epirus - again, despite all honest attempts of the authors, no reference is given - just the same date as the previous reference "Aug 1943 - Sep 1943"
*Bešker, Inoslav: I Morlacchi nella letteratura europea. Il calamo, Roma 2007, . Here, the author mixes the story of the Principality of Pindos, an entity which never existed, with the non-existent Voivodate.
In the end, they all use as a source the family's page https://sites.google.com/site/csesznekycsalad/ancestors (again mentioning Aug-Sept 1943) which is definitely neither independent nor third party reference. I therefore propose deleting all related misinformation about the supposed Voivodate. --FocalPoint (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Voivode ? 
Talk:Ringers: Lord of the Fans

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: "It tells the story of the first cartoon version, along with the Ralph Bakshi version filmed in 1978." Isn't the Bakshi-version also "the first cartoon version"? 217.93.174.212 (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bakshi
Talk:Brendon Urie

message: All of the information (with citations) that I added that got removed can be viewed here (scroll down to the section) and the removal can be viewed here. I recently added some notable information to the article that was removed for being "overkill." This is understandable, I don't object to the trimming, as articles should be concise. Everything looks pretty good.However, I think there are some potentially notable information that can still be considered for inclusion. I.e., it can be better conveyed that the figure is an advocate for LGBT causes (how he's advocated and why he does it), that his performances are commonly paired with and accompanied by LGBT themes/paraphernalia, plus his involvement against Westboro and the blood drive for the Orlando night club victims. Additionally, the figure's charity foundation is a large and notable aspect, I believe; therefore, I think the concert ticket gimmick could be explained, as well as what the purpose of the foundation is (launched for those discriminated against on the basis of race, sexuality, etc.) All of the aforementioned have been covered extensively and can be well-sourced. Again, I don't significantly object to trimming of information, but I think the activism section could be slightly expanded upon, since the figure is well-known for their activism and philanthropy. If this info is ultimately deemed unnecessary, then that is fine too. I just figured I'd make a note on this talk page for what it's worth. - Patmos777 (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Potentially notable information (activism and philanthropy)
Template talk:WikiProject Poetry

message: 1. Clicking on "Current Activities" takes you, for some reason, to "WikiProject Schools"
2. The Template doesn't assign the article on which its place to any category.  I.e. there seems no way of seeing what are all the articles associated with this WikiProject
3. The Template doesn't seem to accomodate any tagging or assessment of priority or state of the articles
In short, this template seems at present to be pretty useless.  --Jbmurray 06:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I don't trust either my design or my technical skills to start editing the template myself.  --Jbmurray 20:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with this template?? 

message: I changed the image. As much as people love Keats, it seemed a bit lacking in NPOV to have him on the WP:Poetry template. It's now a simple quill so it's more neutral and generic. Hope that's okay. --Midnightdreary 13:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Perhaps it is my pc making the error, but the quill seems to be gone? Mrathel (talk) 18:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be gone... not sure why. I like this replacement though.  --Midnightdreary (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  quill broken 

message: Thanks for catching me on the categories. I looked up which was the most specific category I could place all of those images into, than apparently forgot to add it to the template once I had found it. I also could've sworn that William Blake was part of :Category:William Blake task force articles, but when I looked back at the article to verify this, it's not there. I'm apparently confusing myself with The Canterbury Tales. Anyway, I've taken care of these. Thanks again! –Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the documentation
Talk:Homegrown (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Why Men Rule

message: If this is paragraph is describing the argument Goldberg makes in his book then it should be attributed to him.  It's hard to tell if that's what it is or if it's just some wikipedia editor's opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.236.201 (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not Goldberg's argument, it is a verifiable statement. It should be sourced, there are plenty of sources available, and no substantial scientific contrary view afaik. The journal Genes, Brains and Behaviour (and many others) are the primary sources, many secondary sources are also available. A popular book covering some of the material is Steven Pinker's The Blank Slate. Alastair Haines (talk) 15:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Biological research has, in fact, been providing more and more evidence of differences in brain and behaviour between men and women..." 

message: I've belatedly removed tags that offered invalid criticisms of the text of the article. The text is woefully incomplete. Additional material would be much appreciated. Alastair Haines (talk) 15:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag removal 

message: are unacceptable content., unless they are excerpted from published reviews in 3rd party reliable sources. this is so well established, that I have removed the section. if anyone has references to the actual publication of the reviews, please add them back with proper references. DGG (talk)
:That's a sound objection and reasonable action, I concur. I'll deal with reviews when I finally have time to make this article a priority again. Of course, anyone else can demonstrate interest in the article by sourcing several of the quotes. Mead's is from a Redbook review, surprise, surprise. Alastair Haines (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: PS I note DGG has an exceptionally clear and relevant guide to his own editing at Wiki at his user page. There are, imo, some outstandingly clearly expressed principles, illustrated by equally clear examples. Nice to know someone like you has found a page like this. Cheers. Alastair Haines (talk) 02:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews on the book jacket
Talk:Sega Power

message: More info is required to expand the Sega Power article.  These include the following...
===History===
More detail is required on the magazine's history and relevant incidents.
===Content & Style===
Info on the content.  Review style etc.
===Staff===
Staff details.  Who did what and when?
Nreive 14:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand Article

message: Staff details.  Who did what and when?
Nreive 14:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Staff
Talk:Gammatone filter

message: Hi,
I'm trying to understand how this should be categorized, and I don't currently see what it has to do with electromagnetism. Math I can see, though I think it's more into neuroscience (it's used in computational neuroscience, i.e. neural modelling). When I Google for 
gammatone electromagnetism, this Wiki page is the only hit.
Also, it seems to me better to categorize in as many relevant categories as possible.
Thoughts?
--Roger wilco 07:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:River Towy

message: I've changed various instances of Tywi to Towy for consistency (given that the page is titled 'River Towy) though would myself be sympathetic to all instances of the river name being changed to 'Tywi'. I've also tried to give the article a better flow (excuse the pun!) and a clearer structure though more work is required yet.  And no, the Usk/Wysg is not so long as the Towy/Tywi!Geopersona (talk) 06:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As above it needs to be one or the other, please seek consensus for change and then change everything, including page title. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Usk is indeed longer than the Towy, contrary to what I said on the basis of references then known to me, back in 2009!  cheers Geopersona (talk) 08:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to note that the Welsh Academy Encyclopaedia of Wales (p894) also gives a figure of 120km for this river. Geopersona (talk) 07:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:1965–66 NBA season

message: Just as it had been with the Warriors, it was still Wilt, the unbelievable player, versus the Celtics, the peerless team. Those who make this Wilt vs. Russell, miss the facts. Russell rarely guarded Wilt alone. Triple teams were common. Russell had the hops, perhaps the NBA's best ever, to block Wilt's shots at given times. But he got a lot of much-needed help in guarding basketball's Goliath.
Chamberlain the athlete was stronger than any NFL lineman, plus with over 40" of leap. Plus he had skills. What he would be worth 40 years later would boggle the bank. No other player approaches his ability and numbers all-time. 
But the phenomenal player, who made awestruck spectators of his own teammates on the floor, could never beat The Team. Not until he had his own team.
: On this page, as with most every other I have read from this period of NBA history, there is clearly an author at work with a heavy Celtics bias. While stating for the record that I am no admirer of Celtics, time to introduce some objectivity to the mix. Hushpuckena (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilt vs. the Celtics
Talk:1967–68 NBA season

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 17:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Chris Johns (rugby league)

message: The History section of the Melbourne Storm article says that Johns was the first CEO of the club. Is that true?--Jeff79 (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melbourne Storm 
Talk:1986–87 NBA season

message: I just added a bit about the Lakers setting a record for largest lead after the first quarter. I do not know how to site it. The source is http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/198702040LAL.html.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.181.234 (talk) 19:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Banking in Nicaragua

message: This article is dated and doesn't cover the banks that I currently see operating where I live (Jinotega, NI).  I would like to see this updated, but am not sure I'm the one, but can try to pull together information from various expat web sites and tour guides if nobody else has better qualifications and an interest in doing this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MizOre (talk • contribs) 04:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating 
Talk:Terry Matterson

message: Hi , can you please explain the navbox order on this page for me? I don't understand why we start the Brisbane 1992 team, go down to the 2013 USA team and then have the 1988 Brisbane team at the end? Mattlore (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Playing in the first side is a tenuous link at best, and is lumped in with the rest of the questionable links such as teams of the decade, century, etc and teams of the year. It does not ride at the front of the bus.Fleets (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't have a policy on these and so we do them case by case. In this case I think the current order doesn't make sense and will confuse people. I propose we either reverse the order, ie USA first - then Brisbane 1993, 1992, 1992 and then 1988 last like you suggest or we go back to the other order but condense the Brisbane navboxes so they are hidden. What are your thoughts? Mattlore (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That is illogical. Who counts backwards better then they count forwards. That is a truly bizarre proposal. If you are genuine, then I am sorry, but it feels like a massive wind up.Fleets (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so you prefer my other proposal then? Or do you suggest a third way? Mattlore (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Status quo. The current almost uniform project standard.Fleets (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll seek a third opinion then, seeing as we seem to be at an impasse. Mattlore (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you're suggestions in moving away from the status quo are nothing if not creative.Fleets (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

text: Thank you. I have re-ordered the navboxes per this discussion to place the 1988 box first. Mattlore (talk) 00:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Navboxes
Talk:Gene Miles

message: "He was able to off-load the ball on numerous occasions " - really ? In a 12yr top-grade career you'd hope so . -Sticks66 03:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, pretty silly stuff. I think he was famous for his over-the-top basketball style passes though. Not sure how to word that or reference it but.--Jeff79 (talk) 03:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  You'd hope so 
File talk:Control-of-stomach-acid-sec.png

message: This image should be deleted. It is not corresponding with the current opinion; Gastrin induces release of Histamine from the ECL cell.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.216.47 (talk) 07:49, 20 May 2007 
:I can't believe this once was a picture of the day. It is messy and has spelling errors. The diagram bears striking resemblance to a similar one found in Boron's Medical Physiology (ISBN 1-4160-2328-3) — except the book has the bit about the ECL-cell's gastrin-influenced histamine release right. - Quirk (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)