lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ted Ammon

message: The information, facts and details contained in this article seem to be derived from the motion picture Murder in the Hamptons. Detail for detail, word for word, this article is just a brief explanation of the movie. I think that should be even more the reason to challenge the credibility of the information. 76.233.64.51 (talk) 10:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: It is very hard to get any information about Ammon's early life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.53.130 (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The vagueness might be deliberate, caused by relatives, reluctant to admit that he was so badly behaved.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.53.130 (talk) 11:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life 

message: I propose merging the articles Generosa Ammon and Daniel Pelosi into the "Murder" section of Ted Ammon or the yet-to-be-created Murder of Ted Ammon article. Per WP:PERP, Generosa Ammon and Daniel Pelosi are not notable individuals. There is little information in their articles that isn't related to their relationship with Ted Ammon or to their involvement in his murder. A merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in the Ted Ammon article. Mooonswimmer 22:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the proposal per the nom. Let'srun (talk) 19:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 09:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Ted Bates (footballer)

message: Why nothing on this? 78.151.25.83 (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krankies statue 
Talk:HMS Argenta

message: If anyone is interested, I have proposed a new Wikiproject concerning prisons here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 
Talk:Ted Rogers (comedian)

message: "Rogers also provoked ire in the music world with the obvious sub-text of his comedy act and persona deemed politically incorrect and epitomised the banality of American imported ideas regarding the game-show genre. One acidic song sung by the Manchester based cult-indie group, The Fall, "Joker Hysterical Face" with the barbed lyric, "Ted Rogers' brains burn in hell"."
What a load of nonsence!
Yes, that lyric did appear in "Joker Hysterical Face" by The Fall - a very minor, unremarkable track off one of their less memorable albums.  They never mentioned Rogers in any other lyrics neither in that song, nor any other song.  Mark E Smith put that lyric in Joker Hysterical Face simply to sound surreal.  I have never heard Smith mention Rogers in any other context, lyrics, interview or whatever.  
Also, i have also never heard any other artist mention Ted Rogers name, so to say that he "provoked ire in the music world" is absolute claptrap!   I doubt most people in the music business would have given Ted Rogers a second thought.  I would also take issue with the assertion that he was "Polictically incorrect". I don't recall that at all, he was simply not very funny!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.179.104.141 (talk) 13:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terry Melcher

message: By saying the only child of Doris Day and her first husband, I am left to wondering if this means this was Day's only child with this marriage or the only child she ever had.  I checked and it means the latter but I don't know about him.  --24.177.0.156 (talk) 20:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  only child

message: Charles Manson died on the anniversary of Terry Melcher's death in 2017. Colonial Computer 19:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death coincidence 

message: Please note that the death section of this article violated MOS:SURVIVEDBY. I removed the commentary about who lived on after he died, as it seemed unnecessary. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS:SURVIVEDBY 

message: Can someone add to his spouses - I tried but get confused. 
Spouse  Terese Edwards (m. 1998–2004), Melissa E. Brown (m. 1974–1977), Jacqueline Carlin (m. ?–1997) 152.44.65.42 (talk) 22:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terri Melcher or Terri day  

message: "Manson was reported to have visited the house on more than one occasion asking for Melcher, but was told that Melcher had moved."
"Some authors and law enforcement personnel[who?] have theorized that the Cielo Drive house was targeted by Manson as revenge for Melcher's rejection and that Manson was unaware that he and Bergen had moved out. However, family member Charles "Tex" Watson stated that Manson and company did, in fact, know that Melcher was no longer living there,[12] and Melcher's former roommate Mark Lindsay stated, "Terry and I talked about it later and Terry said Manson knew (Melcher had moved) because Manson or someone from his organization left a note on Terry's porch in Malibu."[10]
Which is it? I'm confused.
Porterc5 (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manson Knew/Was Unaware Confusion
Talk:Neal Menzies

message: It would seem that there is a vested interest on this topic, and one wonders whether WP:COI applies in this situation.  Please read that page and look to address the specific concerns.  I am listing the COI here, rather than on the talk page, to allow you time to address this matter.
-- billinghurst (talk) 02:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest?
Talk:Tetsuya Ishida

message: Nothing more is known about this artist in English? 71.53.24.224 (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information? 

message: I took and rewrote the chosen bits from Wikipedia JP and online articles. There are some parts that need rephrased or clarified, particularly in the Art section. My grammatical errors are everywhere and I would appreciate assistance in clearing them up. Thank you. 0zero9nine (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work! I applaud you for your addition to this article! --SweetNightmares (awaken) 19:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. I feel the details of auctions should have a section of its own because it's cluttering up the introduction section in an ugly way. Is this possible? Thank you. 0zero9nine (talk) 14:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created an accomplishments section and moved that info there, as well as mention of his medal of honor. Is this appropriate?--SweetNightmares (awaken) 19:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ishida's Wiki page
Talk:Stephen's Green Shopping Centre

message: I think a photo from the outside (from the north-west gate maybe, or across the road from the taxi rank) would be good. Can someone do one? --A bit iffy 11:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need a photo from outside

message: * (The) Wedding Cake
** https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/stephens-green-shopping-centre-design-6253023-Dec2023/
** https://www.mortarandmore.com/news/2024/01/st-stephens-green-shopping-centre
* Riverboat
** https://www.mortarandmore.com/news/2024/01/st-stephens-green-shopping-centre
* Taj Mahal
** https://www.mortarandmore.com/news/2024/01/st-stephens-green-shopping-centre
SeoR (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sobriquets
Talk:Theodore Roosevelt III

message: :File:Theodore Roosevelt III punching bag.jpg - Kelly hi! 03:45, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo as a child 

message: I see that the site has been corrected to identify him as TR III not IV. However, there are still references to IV in the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aalan94 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name consistency 

message: Within this article, the subject is referred to as "Theodore", "Theodore III", "Theodore IV", and "Roosevelt." I suggest picking just one. I think the usual approach is to use the subject's last name. I suggest leaving out the suffix entirely except in the suffix explanatory section since it's clear that the article's subject is Roosevelt III and all references to Roosevelt should be to the subject. Other uses of Roosevelt can easily be clarified with the correct suffix or a reference such as "his father" etc. Rklawton (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Theodore or Roosevelt

message: Shouldn't the opening say that he is the IV, known as the III, as explained in the "Early life" section?  (Currently it says that he is the III known as the III--which is redundant.)  What does his birth certificate say?173.91.88.197 (talk) 02:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name - Opening sentence is incorrect 
Talk:Thiruchelvam Nihal Jim Brown

message: Just because the source is catholic news does not make it bias towards the LTTE. It basically states what has happened before. Only time a catholic news' report is bias is if it has anything related to the religion. However, in this case it does not.Watchdogb 19:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PS talking off this is considered vandalism now that I added another source. I might even follow in the footstep of Jayg :) Watchdogb 20:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That shouldnt be difficult as we have a lot ofreferences foer this crime against humanity, what we need is a five fold increase in the size of thsi article and show it in the DYK  Taprobanus 14:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic source
Talk:Thomas Wales

message: Text changed that Wales was a Gun Control Advocate.  He was not. He was a Gun Safety Volunteer according to his own website.
:Well according to the link I posted below, he was the president of a gun control advocacy organisation, so... Anchoress 18:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gun Safety Advocate

message: Anchoress 17:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Yorker article August 6, 2007 

message: is a sock of banned user Amorrow. Our policy is ban on sight, revert on sight, for any and all contributions of this user. Comments by Datawants here have been removed. Edits to the article have also been removed. If they were good edits another editor can add the substance of them back, standing behind their veracity themselves, but they should not just be reverted word for word... ++Lar: t/c 00:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Datawants 

message: The briefing foreshadowed took place and is described at this url in case someone wants to update the article:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/deputy-attorney-general-rosenstein-highlights-ongoing-and-intensive-work-solve-2001-murder Bill (talk) 01:34, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Thomas Ferebee

message: The article doesn't make clear; is he the person who actually released the bomb? 92.20.53.184 (talk) 20:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Person who actually released the bomb? 

message: Although Ferebee served during the Vietnam War era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he actually served in Vietnam during the war. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of the Vietnam War was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnam service
Talk:Ouse District High School

message: How Dare you change my page...
Did you go to Ouse School? I dont think so.. your too nerdy for it , spending all your days changing wikipedia pages...
How Rude, changing the Truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.150.61 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 9 April 2007
:See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. -- Chuq (talk) 04:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Since I removed the tag I'll explain myself:
I'm not the creator of the article and I don't mind if this article gets deleted, if that is the decision - but I'm not sure about whether speedy deletion is warranted or not.
I remember there being a centralised discussion on inclusion of schools, but I can't find the result, either at Wikipedia:Schools, Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes, Wikipedia:Centralized discussion.  There may be more but I thought such a policy would be easy to find, and I wanted to remove the tag before it was speedied to allow due process. (OTOH speedy deletion may be appropriate anyway - but I am not sure!)  -- Chuq (talk) 04:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW. Regardless of inclusion criteria, template:db can be used for any article where notability has not been asserted can't it? And where in this article is an attempt at establishing notability been made?Garrie 04:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I assume I won't get a response to this, but please do not vandalise my user page in future. If you have a comment, however abusive the nature of your comment, add it to my talk page, not to my user page. I do not know this school but I do not need to. Upon reading "what is wikipedia" and other relevant pages I think you should pay more attention to what wikipedia is not. It is not a reference book for every street, school and playground in the world and you have not included any information about the historical or current interest involved in the school. I do not know what made me initially place an "AfSD" tag on this as it was more than a week ago, but if i did so then it would have been for justified reasons. Again please refrain from any further vandalism of my user page as it is not appreciated Douglike 12:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In case you are not sure, the user who vandalised your page was User:203.129.150.61, the same IP that posted the comment at the top of this page.  Normally I would suggest go to their user talk page, but there isn't usually much point trying to reason with vandals. -- Chuq (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria
Talk:Thomas J. Whelan (mayor)

message: This article needs some work.  I've made the smallest of starts, but if someone who's interested in this article doesn't give it some sources, it would seem ripe for a request for deletion. David in DC (talk) 19:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This was still on my list to work on as I am continuing to do with all of the Jersey City Mayors. I've added several references, but still need to track down an obituary. As an aside, as a mayor of Jersey City, and not being living (so not covered by BLP) this would probably have gone nowhere in an AFD discussion. Jim Miller (talk) 02:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Thank you for your work on this. David in DC (talk) 15:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak Sources 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Thomas J. Whelan was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/A-class rating/Peano axioms

message: How long is the discussion supposed to last? — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 11:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully it can close quite soon. I'd like to sort out how much of your version User:Kaustuv/ip/Peano axioms should be merged in. I've not look over it in detail but the lead seems better. --Salix alba (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also hope it will be closed. Anyone can close it, even if they have participated in the discussion, and the proces is easy. I am refraining from doing it because I was the nominator. CMummert · talk 11:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Western Isles representative football team

message: The Western Isles isn't a nation, its a Region. The side competes in the Island games and only the Island games...--Allanmac9 11:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The flag used is also the product of an overactive imagination. The Western Isles don't use a Union Jack ensign. --MacRusgail 15:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Acording to Island Games Association (IGA)  it is the flag that represent Western Isles  Calapez 01:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

text: No it isn't. No one in the Western Isles I know of uses it, and as for the Union Jack, it has an SNP MP and MSP. Go figure. The birlinns are the flag of the Western Isles, not this ensign. --MacRusgail 19:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

text: That's the flag they use in the IGA official website.. at least in the Island Games Western Isles use that oneCalapez 00:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tiberio Mitri

message: The "stub" header, was removed from this page, after I'd spent an evening fleshing out info. As a part of that night's project, I had tried to tidy the "enthusiast" quality cited as one of the page issues, without mulching every syllable previously added (my likes, if all opinions are equal, there in all probability, is not a page within this vast concept, which doesn't have issues...and, with a Chomskylike wink, I'd remind, if we all have issues, none of us have issues).
I was able to tone the level--I feel, acceptably--and would ask any powers that be so designated, to review the page and with hope, to remove the header, re: "conversation", i.e. reminiscing/memory/enthusiasm/storytelling. For the "how" of the page needing to read, as of my edits/additions, it should pass muster.Two-Fisted Tales (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Removal of Specific "issue" header 

message: I am continuing pursuit of materials containing further information on Mitri, not an easy task. The source material cited, upon review, seems IMO, sufficient to carry the relatively light amount of reference information. There is not one source, not two. To cattle about number of sources cited, when dealing with subject matter of such a limited amount, is picayune. Please Remove the two-year old header, re: "need" of more source material. Unless editors in Western and Southern Europe join the cause, There Aren't Other Sources, but as found gold...to be metaphorical about it...
Further, the "opinion" complaint/header, was on when I arrived to the page. I have not entirely eliminated the previous editor's comments, as I've been dealt with in such a manner myself, and find it offhandedly rude. I therefore, when encountering seemingly "personal" involvement in a topic, trim here, tweak there, and chop a bit if I have to. In time, I can shape it to the not-quite-zip code directory style favored here, but this is as more material is located (See Above). I can see this header remaining, short term, but will be tweaking toward conformity, as I go. I'll say, if you're not going to make regular scans on "multiple issues" pages, maybe you should ignore the dyspeptics, who tag them.Two-Fisted Tales (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Removal of Remaining Headers 
Talk:Tibor Scitovsky

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://homepage.newschool.edu/het//profiles/scitov.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 03:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Host address

message: Where can i get complete information about ip addressing
:Ideally, from Wikipedia! I've been looking for an article for just this sort of thing to serve as a reference for students learning the subject. Maybe you can help me out with building it. Someone who is just learning about IP addressing will need to know about binary numbers to understand what an IP address is. They'll probably want to check out IPv4, and don't really care about IPv6 yet. To understand how subnetting works for ip addressing, they'll need to know about classful addresses (such as class A, class B, etc), and classless addresses created with a CIDR. So what else should be covered in a general article about ip addressing? Gahread 08:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete information

message: What's being described here is what is called by Classless Inter-Domain Routing a Host identifier. Host address is a more general term so, since this article is now an unreferenced orphan, I'm redirecting this to Network address for now. ~Kvng (talk) 16:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Concordia (mythology)

message: I would agree with the merge. Both articles are talking about exactly the same god as the Greeks and Romans had the same gods but under different names. However it needs to be made explicitly clear in the title that the god has two names. --Paronomasia 11:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trionychidae

message: This turtle appeared on 2001 and was confirmed as endangered by Chicago. Now, after 7 years, it reappeared. So, it is notable and encyclopedic. Further, this is a stub and must be expanded by good links like this Philippine reference.--Florentino floro (talk) 12:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rarest and endangered species in Philippines

message: I edited the common name to be consistent with Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians. Sixth Edition. and the Peterson's field guide for reptiles and amphibians. The established common name for this taxon is softshell, not softshell turtle, or soft-shell turtle, both of which were used in the article.  I didn't correct the incorrect capitalization even though it does not follow rules for capitalization as established by Scientific Style and Format (Council of Scientific Editors), Chicago Manual of Style (The University of Chicago Press), and the AP Stylebook 2004, which are the gold standards for format and style that Wikipedia continually ignore in its sloppy and inconsistent approach to names of organisms. One thing at a time. We'll see if my first, indisputably documented edit will stand. If it doesn't, I have little hope for the quality of information in Wikipedia. I was unable to delete the turtle from the article's title.
Full citation: Collins, Joseph T. and Travis W. Taggart. 2009 Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians. Sixth Edition. Publication of the Center for North American Herpetology
Download this publication here www.naherpetology.org/pdf_files/1246.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.236.194 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 11 December 2010
:soft-shell to softshell is correct
:softshelled to softshell is correct
:softshell turtle to softshell is incorrect. Just think of the bog turtle, are you really going to refer to it as 'the bog'?
:You can read more about Wikipedia's naming on WP:Fauna name, WP:CAPS. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Apropos of common names, it might be best to have a disclaimer in this and similar articles to the effect that these are not "turtles" but terrapins. Turtles live in the ocean, and are very different.  I know that everyone calls them turtles. 173.174.85.204 (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect common name and inconsistent with spelling 

message: I have watched this video on youtube, and it pretty much shows that softshells move much faster on land than most turtles. So I added it as additional information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superscaryguy (talk • contribs) 16:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faster than most turtles