Talk:Chain Reaction (1996 film)

message: :Image:Chain reaction ver1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Chain reaction ver1.jpg

message: Firstly, the plot summary needs major work. It needs to summarize the plot not go into so much detail. Next, is there a template available for what movie pages should look like? I'm quite crap at producing things from scratch but, good at converting things if I have a format set out already. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: Since in the movie he is described and talked to as "doctor", he should have the doctor title in his name, as with characters Dr. Barkley & Dr. Sinclair.
Rayghost (talk) 21:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added/Included  Doctor title to Lu Chen character enteries 

message: The summary refers to "bubble fusion," but I do not recall that being explicitly stated in the movie.  Instead there were numerous references to "hydrogen burning," and not in the sense of nuclear fusion.  Can someone verify what terms were actually stated in the film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.8.70.178 (talk) 00:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bubble Fusion or "Hydrogen Burning"? 

message: About 35 minutes in, Morgan Freeman's character is testifying before Congress and mentions the astronauts killed during the U.S. space program. The camera cuts to Fred Ward's character, who is watching the testimony. Ward played Gus Grissom, an astronaut killed in an explosion in one of the early Apollo missions, 13 years earlier, in The Right Stuff. There really isn't any other reason for the camera to switch to Ward at that moment. I'm wondering if this was a nod by the filmmakers to that earlier film. I can't find any source discussing this. Is it worth including in the article? Is there a source anywhere that addresses this? Lafong (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gus Grissom ref? 

message: To clarify, a chain reaction is NOT limited to nuclear fission. It is any reaction that instigates more reactions, generally a self-sustaining reaction. Nuclear fission is a chain reaction, but so is nuclear fusion in the sun. So is a campfire. The source cited for "chain reaction" being used in nuclear fission is broken, and more importantly, incorrect. 209.128.220.126 (talk) 07:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chain Reaction - definition