lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Song of the Lark (novel)

message: The painting is in place of the first edition cover in the info box; the first edition cover is needed. The painting could be in the article, but more likely attached to the section on allusions to the arts. The section on Literary Reception is one or two sentences. Was nothing written on this book when it came out, or in articles since then?    --Prairieplant (talk) 11:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Image of painting that inspired the title was moved into the body of the article where it belongs. The article is now properly flagged as needing a first edition cover image for the infobox. Anyone have the image?  --Prairieplant (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Cover image now provided GrahamHardy (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs First edition cover and Reviews or Literary Reception 

message: , I removed because the first sentence says it was her third novel. If you want to excise it from the first sentence and make it a dedicated second sentence that's fine, but it's redundant now. Urve (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant
Talk:6th Air Refueling Wing

message: Concur, 6th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing should be merged with 6th Air Mobility Wing.Ndunruh (talk) 14:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: There is a chronology of events at Eielson AFB at the end of the section about the 6th Bombardment Wing tenure at Walker.  These events do not deal with the 6th Strategic Wing.  I would propose moving them to the Eielson article.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Eielson Material in Walker Section
Talk:Amatitlania sajica

message: This page should be renamed Cryptoheros sajica, in line with revised taxonomy.  Or else it could be renamed by the common name, T-bar cichlid.Rlendog (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Bobby Farrelly

message: Make osmosis Jones 2 about covid with same actors please 2600:387:F:4013:0:0:0:C (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osmosis Jones 2
Talk:Hungry Hill (novel)

message: Are the "Brodricks" in this article the Brodericks, the Anglo-Irish family of Gobnait Ní Bhruadair, one of whom was St John Brodrick, 1st Earl of Midleton? 79.97.154.238 (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Brodricks?
Talk:President of the Senate of the Philippines

message: Anyone know the exact dates they took office? --Howard the Duck 12:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 
Talk:Shit Hits the Fan

message: This article, as is, is a redirect to an album.  There are only 2 links to this page (one is the album) not including a link from a user page.  Basically, this article is a redirect from an album back to the album.  That is useless.
Further, the notability of this link is in question.  The song "Shit Hits the Fan" must not be notable if it doesn't have an article about it.  So, why does it have a page (even if the page is only a redirect)?  What is notable about the title?  I asked a chat group with over 100 people what "shit hits the fan" means and not one said it was the name of a song.  They all referenced the meaning of the common phrase "when the shit hits the fan".  Therefore, I feel that the main purpose of this page should be information about that phrase, not a redirect to an album. -- kainaw™ 18:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason to delete
Talk:January effect

message: Isn't the January effect most often used to refer to the fact that January has high returns in many stock markets? (Not related to the stock size.) Ben Finn (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong definition

message: http://www.fool.com/investing/international/2009/05/07/5-stocks-to-bloom-in-may.aspx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pisibe (talk • contribs) 21:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: better source

message: As of today (11 March 2010), the last sentence is "The January effect does not always materialize; for example, small stocks underperformed large stocks in January 1982, 1987, 1989, 1990, and 2008.[2]". However, reference [2] is "Siegel, Jeremy J.: Stocks for the Long Run (Irwin, 1994)pp. 267-274". Is there other sources that corroborates this for 2008?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.60.174.248 (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect source

message: The January effect was not discovered by Donald Kaim. In, or before, 1942 Sidney B. Wachtel 'coined the investment term "the January effect"' and his '1942 paper, "Certain Observations on Seasonal Movements in Stock Prices' is cited widely as being the first published mention of it. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100203726.html
"The January effect was brought to the attention of modern finance by Rozeff and Kinney, but it was first introduced to the academic literature more than 50 years ago by Wachtel." The January Effect: Still There after All These Years, Robert A. Haugen and Philippe Jorion, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 1996), pp. 27-31
87.112.188.31 (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Discovery

message: ...it needs a global perspective. Or caveats that the research and sources cited refer to the United States.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.76.19.205 (talk) 07:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems to be about the United States....
Talk:Five Quarters of the Orange

message: Chapter 2 of the first part starts with the text that Françoise (Framboise) is 65 years old when she starts to write the account. Also there were ten people killed in retribution, not 12. I've changed both things in the article. Also the article states that Framboise (Françoise)is the only remaining child. That is not so. Her brother died, but her sister is in a mental institution. I'll change that sentence too. 77.248.89.106 (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In chapter four Françoise (Framboise) writes that she has been back in the village for almost ten years. As she is 65 at the time of writing, she must have been 56 when she returned, so I'll change it in the article again. 77.248.89.106 (talk) 14:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:The True Confessions of Adrian Albert Mole

message: So, what is the actual title of this book? P4k 08:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted it - was confussing :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 12:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article suggests this is an installment that "differs in style" from the others - this is true, but there may be an unacknowledged reason for this. If you read the copyright page, it's noted "Some of the pieces in this book have previously appeared in" a long list of publications. The implication would be that Townsend was asked for follow-up stories (which slid just a little towards granting him cartoon-style eternal youth, shifting his birth from '67 to '68) and eventually rounded them up into books (this and From Minor to Major), which could be mentioned in the article rather than just treating it as a book with a different type of material. However, it's not clear which pieces were carried where, or how much material was new when True Confessions was published. Billwilson5060 (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilation
Talk:Shikasta

message: I have admired Lessing for many years and read most of her novels. However, I have given up on Shikasta, after my fourth or fifth attempt over thirty years. This time I tried harder and reached p.179. There are some attractive passages but overall she writes like Jonathan Swift without his wit, imagination and satirical genius. This novel is mainly (at least the first 179 pages) a dispiriting rant. It is not the ideas that I object to, but the uninteresting ways they are mostly presented. I might add that I enjoy science fiction novels. I cannot be the only one who sees Shikasta as a failure and the article needs to address such criticism better. Rwood128 (talk) 01:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessively didactic novel 

message: Lessing herself never did. Gray's review in 1979 says she was writing a "history of earth" (past and future). The interpretations that this is an allegory belong in the Analysis section, not in the lede or background sections.Martindo (talk) 02:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who says it's an allegory?
Talk:Confucius Shrine, Nagasaki

message: I suggest that this page should be moved to Confucius Shrine, Nagasaki (or similar page). The reason is that Temples of Confucius, Confucius Shrines, etc. are not unique to Nagasaki. Theoretically, this page should carry a general introduction to Confucian Shrines, which is already found at Temple of Confucius, rather than the description of one specific Confucian shrine.
Bathrobe (talk) 11:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move

message: The URL http://www4.cncm.ne.jp/~rekidai-museum/ returns a 404 and should be redirected or removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luridfuzz (talk • contribs) 18:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for "(Japanese) Confucius Shrine and Historical Museum of China" is broken. 

message: Back on 24 February 2011‎, I added the category "Enclaves and Exclaves" to this article but it was undone immediately by Chipmunkdavis who said "Extraterritorial rights are not enclaves or exclaves". But there do appear to be numerous references to this shrine being genuinely Chinese territory, not just 'under Chinese control' (i.e. 'extraterritorial', as e.g. an embassy would be - although, confusingly, the territory is administered by the Chinese embassy in Tokyo). I've not been able to find anything truly authoritative, however, in either English or Japanese. Maybe someone with better research skills, or fluent in Chinese, or based in Nagasaki can find the truth and provide a reference? Ozaru (talk) 08:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enclave/exclave or just extraterritorial?
Talk:The Ace & TJ Show

message: I'm not sure what makes a radio program notable, but this article reads very much like an advertizement. Could someone more experienced with these folks take a look at the article? --Brad Beattie (talk) 08:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I just came back to look at the talk page now. Generally, adverbs indicate a non-POV article. "Wildly popular" would be better served by actually stating the specific numbers. I'm going to try and hunt down the notability requirements for a radio show. I'll reply here within 24 hours as to what I've found. --Brad Beattie (talk) 06:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Come on it's some podunk crap syndicated morning radio show-- is this much detail really necessary? Reads like a damn advertisement. Obviously written by staff for the show or an obsessive, lame fan with way too much time on their hands. Considering how short some Wikipedia articles are on legitimate topics of academic interest, I find it a bit disgusting this is so long.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.169.174.122 (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too long/detailed 

message: April Fools' jokes? Contributing to the "bratiness" of children? This section is very poorly written and arguably not controversial. None of them are encyclopedic. I'm removing it. Dmarquard (talk) 09:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section
Talk:Rhombic antenna

message: I suggest that Advantages of rhombic Antenna be merged into this. If nobody thinks otherwise, I will copy the content over in 2 weeks (dec 20), assuming I remember Kaldosh 08:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: When was it invented? RJFJR (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: When
Talk:List of Italian DOC wines

message: I recently did a massive clean up on this article. It looks like it was a translation from the Italian wiki and, while I certainly appreciate the time and effort put into the translation, over the years since the translation, the article has become difficult to follow and messy. I tried to trim excess info about grapes and types of wine produce because that info is more appropriate for the DOC article and looks cumbersome in its presentation (some DOCs had info, some did not, etc). I also tried to make all the DABs consistent. More to come, but it is a start. AgneCheese/Wine 04:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up note
Template talk:Boston Red Sox roster

message: Following his call up, I created a page for Héctor Velázquez and edited this to direct to that. However, on the Boston Red Sox article the template still directs to his minor league info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Red_Sox_minor_league_players#Hector_Vel.C3.A1zquez. Wondering how to fix this? Williw (talk) 03:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Héctor Velázquez 

message: Someone completely rewrote the names on this roster. Look how stupid they were. 24.233.183.37 (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  OBVIOUS VANDALISM 

message: What happened to the flags? It used to be nice to use this section as a resource to quickly scan and see nationalities... what happened to the flags? What was the thinking behind removing them? If Baseball is expanding internationally with the new Baseball World Cup -- then all the more reason to keep the flags here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.16 (talk) 02:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags
Talk:Ernst Bacon

message: I was going to write all of this on my edit commment, but that seemed pretentious.  My ultimate goal would be to take the info that is on this page already and break it down into the new sections.  There is probably a lot that I can replace with info from the other sources.  At any rate, I'm pretty sure the current page is in violation of the copyright policy.  Whether it has been the Sam Ferrell editing this or not, I'm pretty sure copying and pasting something he submitted to another website won't fly.  So eventually it is all going to have to be deleted or reworded.  I'm still deciding which citation method I prefer in wikipedia, so if anyone is good at that help would be appreciated.  I'm going to try to go through once I finish and do my best to at least make it clear where statements come from, but I'm sure it will need polish. JSellers0 08:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Provinces of Oman

message: Perhaps someone could clarify a few things here:
~ What's the difference between a Region and a Governorate?
~ Are they equivalent "levels" of division or does one include several of the other?
Thanks! --Mpwrmnt 08:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oman is administratively subdivided into nine top-level units: five Muhafazah (governorate, محافظة) and four Mintaqah (area or region, منطقة). The top-level units are subdivided into a total of 62 wilayat (districts), which are the secondary level of subdivision. The lowest level of subdivision are the villages. I asked a Wikipedian from the area what is the big difference between Muhafazah and Mintaqah in Oman. I suspect one has more self-rule than the other. I will report here as soon as I have a response.--Ratzer (talk) 07:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bishop John T. Walker Distinguished Humanitarian Service Award

message: Template was added because while the section praises the bishop behind the awards, it does not detail the work he has done, or why he should be praised. I'm leaving this for someone versed in the subject to fix. -- saberwyn 08:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re:POV-Section
Talk:99th Air Base Wing

message: This is a very special page for me to help write, as this was my Uncle Harold's unit during World War II.   I only remember him as a child, and he lived in Texas (while I grew up in Pennsylvania) and only saw him a few times.  But I remember him talking about the dust storms in north africa and being in Italy during the war.  He died when I was 12 before I went in the Air Force... largely because of him    There is a photo of him later in life just before he retired from the Air FOrce in the mid 1950s on a link I attached in the external links section, along with a summation of his career I was able to get from the personell center in St. Louis.   He was a career air force man who served his nation....   Take care.. wherever you are.  This one's for you Bwmoll3 (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lt. Col. Harold W. Moll
Talk:Springdale Mall

message: I was reading a couple of Mobile Press Register clippings regarding Springdale, and back in the early 1960s, DH Holmes officials expressed interest in constructing a 100,000 square foot store at Springdale as the anchor of a potential north wing expansion. This north wing would have featured thirty open-air storefronts in addition to the DH Holmes building. DH Holmes didn't enter Mobile's market until the early 1970s, with the aquisition and subsequent overhaul of the Hammels department store at Bel Air Mall. NitekMobilian 03:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DH Holmes at Springdale? 

message: Removed Category:Defunct shopping malls in the United States, as this mall is not defunct(defined as: no longer in effect or use; not operating or functioning)  Though partially converted to an open-air mall, it is still a fully functioning mall.  Though some other converted malls are in this category does not mean that they belong there either.  Altairisfartalk 06:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not defunct
Talk:New Hinksey

message: Please do not:
*delete useful information such as the civil parish
*add the same wikilink more than once
*change correct wikilinks to those which point to redirect pages
*add unnecessary boldface to words other than those directly connected to the subject of the article
*add external links not specific to this article
*re-order external links away from their alphabetical listing
More information is available under the Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
Verica Atrebatum 09:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Glastonbury (film)

message: Should this artical contian a list of tracks featured in the film? Seeing as if it's a documentry on a music festival, and music features prominently?JimHxn 09:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Tracks 
Talk:Red Hawk cheese

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Cowgirl Creamery Point Reyes - Red Hawk cheese.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 5, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-01-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Chris, thanks for letting me know. I'm honored to have this image appear on the main page. Actually, this is still the cheese I like best of all ;-) Thanks again and happy holidays! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Cowgirl Creamery Point Reyes - Red Hawk cheese.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Though I admit that it makes a fine picture, I was brought up to believe that the primary function of cheese is to eaten; I would therefore like - and expect from the article - some information about the taste of its subject matter...--Terminally uncool (talk) 09:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some nibble of more information would be nice
Talk:Sepak takraw at the 2006 Asian Games

message: This article seems to suggest India was in Group B but since India and Iran withdrew but India later decided to rejoin, they ended up in Group A. Is this true? Nil Einne 10:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  India 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Captaindansplashback

message: I haven't broken this one down by type of edit; the diffs below (the random diff generator got all but 5 of them) contain all the user's edits anyway, so there isn't a need for the extra information. Using ais523's edit counter. --ais523 09:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count and diffs

message: This gets better as time goes on. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 15:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: lol yeah. ---J.S  (T/C) 15:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's only if you never came across Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janicism. Trust me, it's good reading, go for it. Patstuarttalk|edits 16:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a very similar M.O..  If wonder if it's the same person/group?  ---J.S  (T/C) 18:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pat, ta very much for the link. Distressingly hilarious. riana_dzasta 17:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This user is laughing her ass off. 

message: Obviously, captaindansplashback has a highly developed sense of sarcasm. So when this ... amusment is over, should we move this to Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense? 
Support
# --ElaragirlTalk|Count 18:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Increases potential irony. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 18:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm afraid you lack the experience most people look for in administrators. ---J.S  (T/C) 20:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Doesn't really help.  I'd suggest editing seriously for 3-4 months and try again. ---J.S  (T/C) 16:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Not being an admin doesn't prevent you from being THE EDITOR.  User:Zoe|(talk) 01:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't like the vaguely threatening tone. We have over 1000 administrators.  I don't think there is much that we can't handle. ---J.S  (T/C) 03:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, my comment of "there is much that we can't handle." was meant to be "there isn't much that we can't handle.. ---J.S  (T/C) 21:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: You haven't outlined how you could "save" us.  Your values arn't in-line with the values of wikipedia and you have almost no understanding of wikipedia policy.  You have almost no experience on wikipedia and we have no way to know if we can trust you. Edit for 6 months, learn the system and learn our philosophy and then apply again. ---J.S  (T/C) 21:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poll: Move to BJAODN upon ''close''?
Template talk:The Moon

message: I just uploaded my second attempt at a Moon navigational footer. It no longer contains an image (as per discussion above) and is much more detailed, even though it is almost the same size. It is not collapsible, but I don't think that this needs to be.
Feel free to change this at will. I presume that it still needs some tweaking in terms of color and layout. Lunokhod 20:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 2 

message: What is the significance of Shakelton so that it's included in this template? Skullers (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shackleton
Talk:The First Part Last

message: fyyfyrde the first part last is very calmin bok on the subject of teen rape  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.142.170 (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I can't figure out how to remove the numbers at the bottom of the page in the External links section. What's going on? Roseclearfield (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1. 3102 on bottom of page?
Talk:Rescue robot

message: Hi. I think we need to focus on writing about the robots, their uses, advantages, and shortcomings. The section on the robot competitions seems off-topic (the title of the article is rescue robot, but about half of the text talks about competitions instead of the robots). Sancho McCann 10:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lets talk about robots 

message: Rescue robots are an area of research that has brilliant promise in the future, visible from now.  The images are strongest from true future reports of rescue robots bringing people alive out of disaster locales.  Very inspiring. SyntheticET (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bright future for rescue robots 

message: This article sounds like a school newspaper report written by a middle school student rather than a proper encyclopedic entry. I guess someone with more knowledge on rescue robots should take a look at it and rewrite/add what they can. Farslayer (talk) 03:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic