lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of state highways in Virginia

message: 07-1922-01 has a map at the end, labeled Proposed "State Highway System" for Virginia, as Recommended by the State Roads Committee, January, 1918. Routes are split into primary and secondary. Numbers are not given; some I give here are post-1923. Concurrencies that are known to have existed are not shown.
*1 primary NC (Virgilina) - DC
*2 primary Wylliesburg - MD
*3 primary NC - WV (northeast of Winchester)
*4 primary Cape Charles - MD
*5 primary Courtland - Petersburg
*6 primary WV - DC
*7 primary Winchester - Reedville
*8 primary Fredericksburg - Mathews
*9 primary WV (west of Monterey) - Hampton
**9 primary? Williamsburg - Jamestown
**9 primary? Williamsburg - Yorktown - Shacklefords (07-1921-03 3-4 groups it as Gloucester Point to Saluda)
**9 primary?? West Point? - Saluda
**unknown (post-1928 605) secondary? Burgess - White Stone?
*10 primary KY or TN (Cumberland Gap) - Virginia Beach
**106 primary Abington - Dickensonville?
*11 primary Pennington Gap - WV
**11Z/114 secondary Coeburn - Grundy
***1141 secondary Clintwood - KY
*12 primary Meadowview - Suffolk
**12Z/15 secondary NC - Wytheville
*13 primary Farmville - Richmond, secondary Richmond - Tappahannock
*14 primary NC - WV
*15/331 secondary WV - Woodstock
*16 primary New Market - Madison Mills
*17 secondary Covington - Gordonsville
*18 secondary NC - Afton
*19 secondary Dixie - Richmond
*20 secondary Brookneal - Richmond
*21 secondary? Manassas? - DC
*22 secondary Salem - WV
*23 secondary Meadows of Dan - WV
*24 secondary NC - Emporia
*25 ? (04-1922-01 18 has SR 25 in Manassas, with SR 21 still going via Vienna and the Chain Bridge, but earlier stuff has SR 21 there)
*26 secondary Pulaski - Bland (numbered 26 by 11-1921-02 17)
*27 NC - Norfolk (numbered 27 by 04-1921-02)
39 has a rather strange routing east of Richmond. --NE2 20:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1918 map
Talk:Sony Ericsson W850i

message: "General Comment to the contributor: If you must indulge in such shameless self-promotion at least keep it up-to-date by adding a link to the superseding (later) models and similar models from your competitors. Might help with credibility." Does this really need to be in here? It seems superfluous to me. I'm not deleting it yet, though. Turbokoala (talk) 01:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message at beginning of article 

message: I realize this phone is capable of only  GSM 1900.  I am very struck by the features of the phone and want to understand the Cingular GSM 1900 coverage in Oregon...anyone?
I've had trouble finding coverage maps for each individual band as well. Generally, 1900MHz is used in the US by both Cingular and T-Mobile, while the former also uses 850MHz and the latter 900MHz. I think each carrier may rely more on one band than the other in certain areas, so I've always been on the safe side and never purchased a phone without 850MHz (I'm in Chicago and use Cingular.) This means that I currently can't use this phone or the Nokia n90 until they release a quad-band versions. That's certainly not out of the realm of possibility, since the W810 is the quad-band successor to the W800. It just takes time, unfortunately. I will buy that W860 (or whatever they call it) when it is created. My recommendation for you, then, is to hold off as well; you can't be certain that you will have adequate coverage with this phone as long as it's missing the 850MHz band!  67.175.75.186 01:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of phone on Cingular network in Oregon 

message: On the sonyericsson website, W850i is stated to have just photolight but not xenon flash like K800i. However, the shape and look of the 'photolight' seems to be LED flash. So, is it xenon flash, led flash, or pure photolight which can be used as torch light?
ADouBTor 08:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LED photolight usable as a torchlight. no flash, neither led nor xenon. -- ExpImptalkcon 13:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flash light or led flash or pure photolight 

message: integrate the "Specifications" list into the infobox and turn it into article prose. Anything that can't be moved out of the specs list should be deleted. JayKeaton (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do list
Talk:Nummulite

message: I've heard it claimed that the nummulite was the largest (by volume) single-celled organism known. Is this still considered true? --Iustinus 09:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This site  claims an alga, Caulerpa, is single-celled and grows to a meter; this one  has some other ideas for things up to 25 cm. Geologyguy 14:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: HA! Funny you should mention that, given that a few hours later I was asking about Caulerpa on my blog. But since Caulerpa is colonial and coenonytic I'm not sure it counts. I havent' read that second site you linked to yet, but it looks very promising, so thanks! --Iustinus 17:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Trying to add the Dutch page https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nummulieten in the left column, but not succeeding. Anyone can teach me?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgamleus (talk • contribs) 12:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Dutch page?
Talk:Unheimliche Geschichten (1932 film)

message: I added the "Split" request as there appears to be enough information out there to justify splitting the two films.  Also, the info for them is a bit muddled (not too bad) in the article.  SkierRMH 05:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My concern is that there is not enough material for 2 articles. No poster or VHS cover exists from the original version and almost nothing is known about it. One suggestion is that the article be rewritten in such a way that it is principly about the much more notable 1932 version, with a short mention of the earlier silent version by the same director (Oswald) in his youth. What do you think of that idea? Cott12 Talk 01:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that the 1932 film should be the "star" of this article; the earlier film does deserve a section unto itself.  Doing a quick g-search, there are several books (including a Steven King translation) of the same title, which could get an additional section.  The only thing I couldn't find right off was the book which was the basis for these films, which would be good in this final section, or split off by itself. SkierRMH 01:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In this unusual case, where a director remakes his own film, I think this is the best way. I made a start but it needs work I see. Cott12 Talk 08:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello several years ago. I found more information about the 1919 film and decided to split the article. Happy editing! Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tombstone (typography)

message: Can someone provide a citation for the name "halmos" for this character? I checked the unicode standard, and it doesn't mention this.--Malcohol 09:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I duno, I think that's classsified as common knowledge or something... that's how I learned it. 71.29.123.19 12:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halmos 

message: I remember being told by an instructor that Poincare started the use of the symbol in place of QED, as a pun on his name ("point carré"). Is that apocryphal? 209.234.91.82 (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poincare origin apocryphal? 

message: despite the article name, this page entirely focuses on the usage in mathematics, not the original typographical one from which it is derived. This should be added, and the article maybe merged with Cul-de-lampe (typography) which seems to be another variation of the same idea. --jonas (talk) 08:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  (typography)
Talk:Q (novel)

message: Having read the review by David Liss, it is actually the inclusion of this line in the article that strikes me as "unnecessary and", I suspect, "self-referential."13:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  equal treatment of reviews 

message: I think this thing of "rating" the "importance" of a book is utterly ridiculous. Who decides whether a book is of "high", "medium" or "low importance"? A self-appointed bunch of wannabe literati? And according to what criteria? I smell a stench of cultural discrimination... Leobot 08:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NovelsWikiProject 
Talk:Antecedent (grammar)

message: and what do we do with the people who have naturally been speaking in this method of threading discernment for the listener or the sucker jk😁 2604:CA00:138:8461:0:0:68:11F2 (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ann-ti-si-dint (with all of these i’s pronounced as they are in the word “in”) Editmakerer (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Am I saying the word correctly
Talk:Skeleton Key (novel)

message: Whoever wrote the plot summary either a) used the wrong word (they should have said Storyline instead of Plot summary) or b) decided to add every little detail of the book into it. I know it's part of Wikiproject Novels, but come on! Who needs to know the entire story? I think that when they were writing it, they had the book in front of them and just copied every page. Someone needs to clean this article up. Powerfulmind pleasetalktome! lookatallofmyedits! 23:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the article is tagged as of interest to the Novels project says nothing about having an overblown plto summary, or storyline.  This should be edited quite harshly! Also there is little by way of notability information, critcal comment from reviewers, or even much referencing. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Alex Rider pages have been like this for a while. I've tried to improve them by taking the useless information away but it keeps getting added. In the end, I just got fed up of reverting or changing paragraphs to suit. - My NameIs URL 00:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary or storyline? 

message: I really don't think the article needs to be expanded more that it needs to be shrunk down. (Well...only the storyline) Should somebody put the cleanup template here too? -Bella 22:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding Template

message: Stop changing the word football to soccer. The book is british so it should be a British name. Some guy called Ayrton Prost agrees with me too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongefrog (talk • contribs) 20:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football/Soccer 

message: This page gets vandalised several times every day pretty much. The plot sectioon gets replaced with "read the book" or "just read it thankyou". PLEASE PROTECT IT IF YOU ARE AN ADMIN. PLEEEAAASE!!!!! I will give you a barnstar. I promise.--Spongefrog (talk) 21:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROTECT THIS PAGE
Talk:Mucking

message: I recently added some information on the name 'Mucking' possibly being related to the iron process of mucking. for more information or discussion o to my page--Ironimp (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any locals of the area want to add to the article? Or create one for East Tilbury as well? JH1977 09:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Tilbury 
Talk:Gidgegannup, Western Australia

message: can you tell me about the above town etc whats to do and see in the area.Judy 49.182.34.71 (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NOTFORUM, this page is not the place to discuss that. However, I suggest that you go to the Gidgegannup community website that's listed in . There is plenty of information there, including some contact details on the "About" page. Mitch Ames (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gidgegannup wa
Talk:Callistemon

message: Changed max height. I have a C. viminalis in my back yard that is over 8 metres tall and they regularly reach 15 metres. Anyone planting one expecting a 4 metre shrub will be surprised, to say the least.
::Yes, the local species here seem to grow well over 4 metres, but I'm unsure as to exactly what it is. --Bcsr4ever 10:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Height

message: Bottlebrush are used as landscape plants in Florida: not super-common, but widespread. There is a data sheet at hort.ufl.edu/trees/CALCITA.pdf ... It would be interesting to know where else these plants are cultivated. 71.30.253.207 (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: where grown

message: It says that Callistemon was recently (when?) placed in the genus Meleleuca. If this is true, shouldn't the opening be changed to reflect that it is no longer a separate genus? Murderbike (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That "information" about the genus was added by someone (User:Hybrid.evolution) who is apparently a vandal.  140.147.160.34 (talk) 14:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: It is probably safe to say (although it will be unpopular with some) that Callistemon has been subsumed into Melaleuca, especially if we are to use APNI as our guide. APNI now only lists registered cultivars under Callistemon. Sometimes, where the move might have resulted in two species with the same binomial (eg. Callistemon citrinus and Melaleuca citrina) new names have been given (in this case Callistemon citrinus is now Melaleuca citrina (Curtis) Dum.Cours. and the former Melaleuca citrina is now Melaleuca lutea Craven). All that remains is for someone to write the new articles. References? Gderrin talk 23:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which genus? 

message: I was viewing the page view statistics for this page, and there is a significant increase in page views in May/April.
See here: https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2016-01&end=2020-06&pages=Melaleuca|Callistemon.
Does anyone know why? What are your thoughts?
It is wierd as every other genera I have tested do not have this pattern in page views. 
--Ben (talk) 05:14, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange pattern in page view statistics. 

message: In what season does it grow? 109.166.138.145 (talk) 17:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends on which species you are asking about. Most species are known as Melaleuca and the flowering times are listed there. Gderrin (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season growing?
Talk:Woodlesford

message: Please note this is only an early version of the woodlesford article I'm working on. The final version will be better structured and more detailed. If anyone has any information on woodlesford such as its history and doesn't want to directly edit the article themselves please contact me via wiki and I'll include it in later updates.
T3DLuke
Hi, my name is Howard Benson. I'm compiling a history of Woodlesford station. My email is bensoh10@hotmail.co.uk 83.105.134.72 19:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Legend of the Gold of Babylon

message: Hi,
Some sources (like ,  and ) credits the director of Lupin III: The Legend of the Gold of Babylon as Kiyoshi Suzuki. 
We're now sure that this anime was actually directed by Seijun Suzuki (as stated on this article, and from his own words on this interview : ).
What's still to be clarified is whether Suzuki used his usual artist first name (Seijun) or the Kiyoshi pseudonym.
We would really want to put the record straight on Seijun Suzuki's articles, and we're presently discussing about this on the Suzuki's articles French talk page and on the Japanese talk page. The only way we could close the question is to see the credited name on an official The Legend media (a poster, the DVD cover etc.), but neither of us have such a material offhand. 
Could someone help us please ? The question is : on the DVD cover (or so) do you see "鈴木清順" (that's "Suzuki Seijun") or "鈴木清" (that's "Suzuki Kiyoshi") (if you have trouble displaying Japanese kanjis, here is a small screenshot : ) ?
Thanks in advance for your help. Benjamin.pineau 11:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Director credited name
Talk:Patties pie

message: "Outside Victoria, Patties pies are best known as party pies (hors d'oeuvre size finger food versions of the Australian meat pie), and similar serve size sausage rolls and quiches." Doesn't make sense, as currently written this means the party pies are known as quiches and sausage rolls outside Victoria, i don't think so. If changed to "Patties pies are best known for their party pies...", that would make some grammatical sense. Also please be aware that this page as i found it would probably breach Wikipedia's "Neutral point of view" policy wp:npov. Please be aware of Wikipedia policies.David Woodward ☮ ♡♢☞☽ 06:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Party pies" known as quiches?
Talk:Bairnsdale

message: I live here. --Destructo 087 04:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love this place 
Talk:Patties Foods

message: Patties ASX announcement about test results:
http://pattiesfoods.com.au/system/investor_documents/files/000/000/184/original/Test_Results_for_Nanna's_Brand_Mixed_Berries_1kg_packs.pdf?1429141601
or
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=01616332
I can't edit due to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, family has shares in Patties. David Woodward ☮ ♡♢☞☽ 10:16, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hepatitis A test results
Talk:Donald F. Duncan Sr.

message: Im removing this and replacing it with one paragraph, very similar in form to that which the article started with. the reasons are twofold: poor structure, and as-yet unverifiable information such as crediting duncan with the invention of the looped slip-string (an assertion found only at the duncan history page). popefauvexxiii 10:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd/3rd paragraphs sloughed and merged

message: I'm not that great at this, but somone needs to make a page on the yoyo company he created. Jackson Smith 00:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duncan yoyos 

message: changed the wording from dominates that industry to remains an industry leader and removed the fact tag. I cant find anything sourceable, but every casual reference i've found names Duncan as one of the "Big three" manufacturers. --popefauvexxiii 08:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duncan Parking Technologies 
Talk:Narkomtiazhprom Building

message: This is great, just one little quibble: the Melnikov picture is actually of his design for the Palace of Soviets. Here's a link to his Narkomtiazhprom design: http://www.utopia.ru/english/item.phtml?id=20&type=graphics&sortby=author&start=250Owenhatherley 20:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:List of Digha Nikaya suttas

message: Why is this article not part of the Digha Nikaya article? Peter jackson 10:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I was wondering if it might be of value to create a "redirect page" for "Mahasatipatthana Sutta" to the existing "Satipatthana Sutta" article?  Or might it be better to rename (move) the existing "Satipatthana Sutta" page to something like, "Mahasatipatthana and Satipatthana Suttas."  Thought I'd just throw this idea out here for consideration.  (Anyone feeling bold?) -LarryR 06:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! Forgot I created the redirect back in June.  This article's reference to the Mahasatipatthana Sutta did not link to the redirection page because of the hyphen after "maha."  So, hoping no one minds, I'm gonna override this article's wikilink.  Sorry for my confusion.  LarryR 05:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahasatipatthana Sutta redirect to the Satipatthana Sutta article?
Talk:Dīgha Nikāya

message: Why is there a separate article listing the suttas of the Digha Nikaya? It ought to be part of this article. Peter jackson 10:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Classes in World of Warcraft

message: As it is, it's just a guide to classes in World of Warcraft. No assertion that these classes are important in anyway other than as a guide. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 06:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Races and factions of Warcraft is where this article should point to. It is somewhat a content fork, and any important information in here needs to be moved over there. Blake (Talk·Edits) 15:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Oh, nevermind. I had a brain fart, and thought races and classes were the same. I still think this information could be presented somewhere else, like Gameplay of World of Warcraft. Blake (Talk·Edits) 15:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not sure that this is notable. 
Talk:Jack Trice

message: The note that Jack Trice wrote was on the Curtis Hotel stationary. According to other sources, the Curtis would not be described as racially segregated, but as Minneapolis downtown hotel where non-whites could stay, as opposed to the Radisson where they could not. The Curtis employed an all-black dining staff, but had white clients. Group29 (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curtis Hotel
Talk:First United Indonesia Cabinet

message: Some effort is being given to applying letters after peoples names - this sets a difficult precedent - I am not sure that it is a wise exercise - as it would follow that all other Indonesian cabinet lists would need the same treatment - thats a lot of checking SatuSuro 08:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer names without titles. Revert? — Indon (reply) — 09:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualifications?

message: I have been doing background reading on this and plan to be bold some time soon. Basically I think the History of Indonesia template should point at a general Cabinet of Indonesia article (replacing the current redirect). I think that page should have a section on the history of Indonesian cabinets, including a table of names and dates (with links to the various cabinets of the past) and some general info about cabinet government in Indonesia and a list of the current cabinet, with names, portfolios and party affiliations as it presently stands. The United Indonesia Cabinet article would then be the place for details of reshuffles involving President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's cabinet (which did not change the name of the cabinet). I'd be interested in hearing what others think before I go ahead... Davidelit (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite