Talk:Cameron Todd Willingham

message: Whoever keeps doing that, childing insults and swears do not belong here and only weaken your position.
Smb2a (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV info at the bottom of the page 

message: I've never heard anybody but Kevorkian called "Dr. Death."  Is this information really reliable?  Shouldn't there be a direct reference to support if so? RivGuySC (talk) 03:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: James Grigson additions

message: I'm not sure why  was added and not  was not.  The editor who added it did not make a comment here but it seems clear that a lot of guilt-supporting text which was uncited has already been deleted rather than citations added for them.  There's not been a corresponding scrub of innocence-supporting uncited text.  If this continues we might have some WP:POV or WP:WEIGHT issues. patsw (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Drive-by tagged here. 78.34.205.77 (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed.  As I mentioned in the edit summary, it all seems to be cited now.  If it is not, add the tag back and detail why here. patsw (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy tag 

message: http://www.chicagotribune.com/media/photo/2009-08/48850408.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.233.178.254 (talk) 19:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: how about add this photo to the article

message: this is not rocket science.  if there was no arson, how could willingham have killed them?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.233.178.254 (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: An investigation, trial, and appeals were all conducted and he was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt.  The purpose of this Wikipedia article is different from the purpose of the Innocence Project and reviewers of the arson evidence.  Their purpose is to publicize what they to believe mistakes made starting with the initial investigation of the fire through Willingham's execution.  The article's purpose is to present, in summary, the findings of the court, the case made by the prosecution, and the case made by the defense -- and since the execution, summarize the alleged errors in the arson evidence, rebuttals, etc.  Arguments are left to others.  Editors here summarize. patsw (talk) 03:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: if there is no arson then this could not be murder

message: * Analysis of the Fire Investigation Methods and Procedures Used in the Criminal Arson Case Against Ernest Ray Willis and Cameran Todd Willingham - Craig L. Beyler.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.233.178.254 (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: this is well worth reading first hand

message: Is it me or is rick perry an evil man?  http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/DN-perry_19tex.ART.State.Edition2.4bf3d78.html
It's entirely you.  Well, you and the rest of the left that has founbd an item to seed the 'net with in preparation for the 2012 election and their excuse making for their current disgrace.FMChimera (talk) 14:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tex Governor Rick Perry defends himself

message: More from the Dallas Morning News (linked below).
I wonder of the governor's motives in sweeping "three appointees from their jobs just two days before they were set to critically examine a flawed arson investigation that contributed to the execution of a Corsicana man" ibid. I wonder of the governor's agenda for the coming years and how a definitive conclusion that his state, the state of Texas, executed a demonstrably innocent person might affect that agenda and the governor's standing with his constituents.
Will sovereign immunity shield the governor, legislature and courts of Texas from civil and criminal action should the alleged evidence that a demonstrably innocent person was executed by the state of Texas ever be reviewed by an independent authority? Where does bloodlush lay on the scales of justice?
By any reasonable measure, assuming it was not riddled with falsehoods, the New Yorker article recounting the tale of woe of Cameron Todd Willingham seems quite convincing. If a wrong can be righted, it should be.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/100109dntexperryarson.1cf2d2edb.htmlGwopy (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perry did this because he has an election coming up.  By doing this THE DAY BEFORE THE COMMISSION WAS TO MEET he hopes it will go away until after the election.  after that he won't care if the entire world knows he signed off on an innocent man being executed.  and his followers aren't the type to shed a tear for innocent people being executed.  I mean read Perry's public comments on the matter, he could care less about investigations and science and forensics.  Killing perceived criminals carries a lot of currency in the state of texas.  I have been here for 40 years.  this is a blood thirsty state run by right wing religious whack jobs who think the world is 6,000 years old and want to see the bible taught in science class.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.187.190.208 (talk) 02:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A note to those involved in this conversation- please do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks do not help make a point; they only hurt the Wikipedia community and deter users from helping to create a good encyclopedia. Derogatory comments about another contributor may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to blocks. Thank you. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: {I did not realize how old this argument was}(1) This page does not belong to you and what you feel is clutter and what substantially relates to the Willingham article is irrelevant. (2) You just attacked someone for politely telling you not to attack other Wikipedia contributors.  (3) You have a pattern of attacking people when you are unable to provide facts, or coherent reasoning to validate your opinions. Personal attacks diminish the quality of this site and encourage people who actually have something to to contribute to leave. Annoyed with fanboys (talk) 09:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas Gov. obstructing justice in the Willingham case? 

message: The City of Corsicana released a 21 page document that amounts to a rebuttal of the Beyler report.  I have added a section summarizing its main points and provided a link to it as well.  It's going to be very interesting to me to see if it gets "wished" away by some of the people here who are pretty much Willingham advocates.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.199.217 (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: With a reported nine fire investigation reports on record, why is there an entire section for a response to a single report? As the Beyler report is not summarized in the article, why is the response from the city afforded such a summary? Without of a summarization of the Beyler report, the response does little more than note that the city disputes the findings, which could be stated with a single sentence. --Crusher1 (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The editor who added it seems to be coming from this article at a partisan angle; I'm certain he's acting in good faith, but it's best to remember that this is an encylcopedia, not a blog of current events. I concur, Crusher, we should perhaps slim that entry down. There has been a back and forth- for instance, the New Yorker posted a rebuttal to the city's report. Perhaps that should be included as well. Ks64q2 (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added in City of Corsicana Response to Beyler Report 

message: perry refuses to release the letter sent from attorney who initially pointed out the bad arson evidence to hault the willingham execution:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D9B92QUO0.html
perry tried to pressure the forensics committee:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-arson-williinghamoct12,0,7089579.story
perry sure seems intent on covering up his role in the execution of willingamn.  he ridiculed the "so-called expert" in public which is funny because beyler is a nationally recognized arson expert and not some hick from corsicana.  beyler is THE leading arson expert in the country and his credentials are over the top impressive.  perry's aids complained about the cost of having beyler review the arson evidence.  obviously perry wants this to blow over until after the election.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.233.178.254 (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is Perry only interested in justice once he's been reelected? Perry has not sought to discredit the expert testimony, that his government commissioned, IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. So, does he have some evidence that would discredit the Beyler review or is he simply interested in deflecting assertions that he is obstructing an effort to realize the true facts until he's been reelected? Such a person would be an immeasurable coward.  - Gwopy 05:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: more from texas gov perry's office

message: Willingham was arrested for beating his wife over the stomach with a telephone in an attempt to cause a miscarriage while she was pregnant with two of the dead children in this case. It shows what could be a pattern of behavior and should be added to the section detailing his prior abuse of his wife.
http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/death/US/willingham899.htm
-smb2a (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember reading anywhere that he was arrested on that matter. These claims sufaced during the trial if i remember correctly. --Dwarfpower (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, srsly... She was married to the guy, and didn't leave him after this alleged incident. So, let's say it's false... Surely that makes sense. But if it's true, doesn't that also make sense? She didn't leave him. Disregarding any possible incentive to lie to protect someone you care about, battered women do have a tendency to act in somewhat irrational ways. You can't possibly expect a jury to believe that he didn't beat her rather than to believe that they should protect her since she apparently cannot protect herself. -.- J.M. Archer (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Abused women often rationalize staying with the abuser. Economic, emotional, social pressures, etc. See pimps beating prostitutes who then go right back to get beaten more. Not unusual behaviour. Let's keep original research and musings out of this and just use the facts as claimed in authoritative sources.Pär Larsson (talk) 18:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Not relevant in my opinion. Clearly the evidence from Hurst has exonerated him of any wrong doing in the arson case and thus there is no motive because there is no crime. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.109.138.40 (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempt to cause Miscarriage 

message: This man himself is not actually notable and there is scant information about him unrelated to the trial and consequences.
However his trial, execution and ensuing public debate clearly ARE notable. Perhaps a move to a new article named Cameron Willingham execution controversy (or similar) would be more appropriate? That would also remove the requirement to try and present this article as a "biography" article when it really isn't. Manning (talk) 
01:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very few notable people are notable aside from books or songs they wrote, movies they starred in, sports games they played or political offices they got elected to. Willingham was notable because of a very questionable death penalty decision, but that is notable enough.Jimmuldrow (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I somewhat sympathize with the idea that the person CTW is less notable than the controversy, but when people look for this they google the name CTW, not "texas execution controversy" or some such. The guy is post-humuously famous for being one of very few arguably proven-innocent people executed in North America in modern era. People's idea of "proof" may vary, ofc. Pär Larsson (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible page move 

message: Are there two John Jacksons? Thanks, Rich Peterson69.181.160.248 (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: John Jackson is described as a prosecutor in the case and as a judge in the case

message: Prior text:
Current text:
* 
: I'm sorry, I don't see how your second example is prejudiced, biased, presumptuous or unfair language. Seems more informative and descriptive, if anything. The language should ideally stay as close as possible to what was written in the official text and in authoritative news reports imho.Pär Larsson (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Used" becomes "based on", and other subtle shifts in meaning 

message: I have read the entire article on Todd Wittingham and I do not see any expert giving an explanation for the fire, except arson.  Accidental fires are caused by things like lightning, lit cigarettes, electrical shorts in wiring, appliances over-heating, kids playing with matches, creosote in a chimney, motors burning up in furnaces or other devices, food left cooking on a stove, etc.  I think the article is incomplete if there is no statement by a forensic expert on an accidental cause for the fire that killed the 3 girls.  Did they or didn't they find an accidental cause? 75.218.73.7 (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the New Yorker article: "Without having visited the fire scene, Hurst says, it was impossible to pinpoint the cause of the blaze. But, based on the evidence, he had little doubt that it was an accidental fire—one caused most likely by the space heater or faulty electrical wiring." 70.69.235.4 (talk) 09:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Having read the trial transcript and the statements, those possibilities for the cause of the fire in the building (rather than a trailer) are ruled out by the original investigator Vasquez on what seem to be fairly solid grounds- ones as I remember not connected to the theories that Hurst disputed in his commentary on the case. Electrical wiring was specifically ruled out, and on-scene investigators established that the gas powered space heaters were off at the time of the fire (taps closed) and their damages suggested they were consumed by the fire rather than its initiator. It is worth noting that Hurst, by his own admission, had time only for a fairly cursory meta-investigation, whereas Vasquez' investigation was done on scene at the time. Furthermore, none of Hurst's evidence is specifically exculpatory- while it does raise doubts about the arson investigation, that was only part of a totality of circumstance and behaviour that led to Willingham's conviction. Furthermore, Willingham volunteered the alarming statement, prior to formal accusation, that he poured cologne over the floor in the areas suggested as places where accelerants were spread "because the children liked the smell". He said this first to the fire marshal when they were on scene and repeated it in his sworn statements. He offers these half-explanations throughout- squirrels eating wires, but maybe not, kids touching the gas heater, but maybe not, cologne poured on the floor, so that's what you'll find there etcetera. I went in to the reading convinced of Willingham's innocence, but reading through the statements and transcripts a fairly solid case emerges for Willingham's guilt. The article misses NPOV a couple of times, most egregiously where the New Yorker investigation is said to "demonstrate" Willingham's innocence. It does no such thing- the investigation has not been rigorously examined, and so at best can be said to suggest innocence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.46.239 (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What caused the trailer fire? 

message: TV news reports from the beginning of the case suggested prosecutors believed the children were murdered for life insurance money, despite the fact that no such insurance policies existed. 
However, I see no mention of that in this article.--Skintigh (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Got a reference or a link so interested people can check it out and include it in the article? Pär Larsson (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

text: It's been reported that the children were insured for $15000 with Stacy's grandfather the primary beneficiary.--Brian Dell (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's insurance policy as motive 

message: I've removed this section, is there any objection to that? - Aaron Brenneman (talk) 01:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: While there's an understandable amount of space given to the theories of Hurst and Beyler, being as the main notability of this case is that there was some dispute, very little space is given to the rebuttals from Corsicana- they are mentioned in passing only, despite addressing the main issues that Beyler brought up.
http://corsicanadailysun.com/thewillinghamfiles/x46870673/-09-06-09-No-doubts
supports the verdict, and gives some context to Willingham's purported bad character beyond the words of Dr. Grigson, a man the article goes out of its way to present negatively. There seems little balance in the article between the defence and prosecution cases, whereas in the court transcripts and statements people mention Willingham's evasiveness and the issues they had with his story , along with potential motivation. The accelerant findings are strange in light of Willingham's admission to have poured ethanol-based cologne over the floor of the burnt house, which I think at least is a fairly important detail where fire investigation is concerned.
A PDF here, on the fire evidence: http://static.cnhi.zope.net/corsicanadailysun/images/City_of_Corsicana_response.pdf
His defence lawyer gives the reasons why he believes in Willingham's guilt, as found on Huffpo, via AP.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/02/cameron-todd-willingham-j_n_376580.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.46.239 (talk) 17:57, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focused overmuch on Hurst, Beyler theories? 

message: I deleted this:
A 2011 documentary film, Incendiary: The Willingham Case, mixed stylized explorations of fire science with cinema verité coverage of efforts to review Willingham’s case – by the Texas Forensic Science Commission and within the Texas court system.[5] The film brought renewed attention to Willingham's case in theatrical release. [6]
1)  Because I just HATE the whole prose.  HATE it.  "mixed stylized explorations" and "cinema verite".  Please.  This is an encyclopedia, not a gossip column or a swishy academic textbook on film-making.  I just HATE it.  HATE it.
2)  The article is about an execution, a murderer and a murder.  Not a film about an execution, a murderer and a murder.  The existence of that little factoid about the film should be buried deep at the bottom of the article until the collective realizes is a meaningless bullet on a list of other irrelevant things, all of which could be thrown out and not harm the article one bit.  Nor would they be missed.
3)  Did I mention how badly I absolutely HATE that sentence?  "cinema verite", PLEASE.  Wiki should have a list of two-word combinations that should NEVER appear in any wiki article, ever, and those two words should be at the top of that list, and in BOLD.Jonny Quick (talk) 08:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Reference to a Documentary 

message: I'm troubled by both the presentation and the content of the "Documentary Film" section. I have no issue with mentioning it, in fact I wish there was a section exploring the various mediums that have focused attention on Willingham's case. However this section does not IMO strike the right tone for this type of article. It reads as an advertisement to be honest. Does anyone have an opinion on how it reads,  and how it could be rewritten or re incorporated into the article without requiring it's own section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B000:8D2E:D0F8:B4DD:62D6:B676 (talk) 03:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The documentary has its own WP entry where more details can be shared. EricEnfermero (Talk) 01:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Troubled by "Documentary Film" 

message: Here is a very in-depth article: The Prosecutor and the Snitch: Did Texas execute an innocent man? published on August 4, 2014.  It calls into question the validity of Willigham's conviction, and it details the possibility that an innocent man was indeed executed in this case.  This account was reported and written by Maurice Possley for The Marshall Project, and published in conjunction with The Washington Post.  Perhaps it contains useful information to include in Cameron Todd Willingham's Wikipedia article.  Thanks.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 00:08, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article 

message: Hi! I just had a question. At the end of the first paragraph under Gerald Hurst, there is this sentence: The glass was dispelled by a 50-home investigation in San Francisco. Maybe it's me, but... what the heck does that mean? Thanks. Ronaldomundo (talk) 22:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this should be referring to the notion that crazed glass indicated arson. A long-held fire science belief was that crazing (a special kind of cracking) of a house's glass was only seen in association with arson. It looks like a 1991 investigation of a 50-home fire in Oakland (finding crazed glass in 12 of 50 homes, despite a known accidental origin) disproved the crazed glass/arson link. Here is an article with more info. Death penalty articles stress me out, but I may take a look and see if I can clarify the language. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cameron Todd Willingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090828010833/http://www.amnesty.org:80/en/library/asset/AMR51/182/2004/en/dom-AMR511822004en.html to http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/182/2004/en/dom-AMR511822004en.html
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.corsicanadailysun.com/opinion/local_story_241210447.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cameron Todd Willingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090828010833/http://www.amnesty.org:80/en/library/asset/AMR51/182/2004/en/dom-AMR511822004en.html to http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/182/2004/en/dom-AMR511822004en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cameron Todd Willingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110928040823/http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Willingham_Transcript/Willinghamv12.pdf to http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Willingham_Transcript/Willinghamv12.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110928040758/http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Willingham_Transcript/Willinghamv11.pdf to http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Willingham_Transcript/Willinghamv11.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120803001838/http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Tune_in_Tonight_Scheck_on_The_Good_Wife.php to http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Tune_in_Tonight_Scheck_on_The_Good_Wife.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Cameron Todd Willingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://vipthailottery.com/category/thai-lottery-result/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307034749/http://ccadp.org/DrDeath.htm to http://www.ccadp.org/DrDeath.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612050641/http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/statistics/deathrow/drowlist/wilinham.jpg to http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/statistics/deathrow/drowlist/wilinham.jpg
*Added tag to https://www.statelotterysambad.in/nagaland-lottery-result/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612050641/http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/statistics/deathrow/drowlist/wilinham.jpg to http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/statistics/deathrow/drowlist/wilinham.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060502193008/http://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=373&PHPSESSID=e9e284391813cdf3d42895341aa9a096 to http://static.cnhi.zope.net/corsicanadailysun/images/City_of_Corsicana_response.pdf
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20100428051916/http://corsicanadailysun.com/thewillinghamfiles to http://www.corsicanadailysun.com/thewillinghamfiles
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517062914/http://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=373&PHPSESSID=e9e284391813cdf3d42895341aa9a096 to http://www.oag.state.tx.us/oagnews/release.php?id=373&PHPSESSID=e9e284391813cdf3d42895341aa9a096
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20130905125431/http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Cameron_Todd_Willingham_Wrongfully_Convicted_and_Executed_in_Texas.php to http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Cameron_Todd_Willingham_Wrongfully_Convicted_and_Executed_in_Texas.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cameron Todd Willingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100208111249/http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=10401390 to http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=10401390
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024011120/http://articles.cnn.com/2010-10-06/justice/texas.execution.probe_1_cameron-todd-willingham-eugenia-willingham-stacy-kuykendall?_s=PM%3ACRIME to http://articles.cnn.com/2010-10-06/justice/texas.execution.probe_1_cameron-todd-willingham-eugenia-willingham-stacy-kuykendall?_s=PM%3ACRIME
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100208111249/http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=10401390 to http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=10401390
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cameron Todd Willingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928040758/http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Willingham_Transcript/Willinghamv11.pdf to http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/Willingham_Transcript/Willinghamv11.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Given that a lot of the evidence used to convict him is now considered to be dubious should we replace it with 'American convicted for murder' or something similar? Infospazm (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  should we change the subheading 'American Murderer' to something more neutral?