lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Relief valve

message: I did not understand the sentence about the spring under hydraulic relief valve. That is why I deleted it. Maybe the one who wrote is can make the addition more clear.
Jamclaassen 09:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the different between relief and safety valve?
can you elborate more?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.154.251.26 (talk) 06:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  valve 

message: The image has very little, if any, merit:
*All it shows is an man looking at a piece of equipment. If not so stated in the caption, I would not have recognized that it was an "oil-immersed transformer".
*I can see nothing in the image (even when enlarged) that looks like a relief valve). 
*Even if I could recognize a relief valve in the image, so what? What is notable about a man looking at a piece of equipment?
With all due respect, I don't believe the image provided any additional knowledge to this article. mbeychok (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed ShriRamTalk tome 18:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I removed the image added by [[User:Shriram]] 

message: Relief valves are very general and are used with all sorts of liquids and gases.  In the description of operation, the wording is very specific to venting of flammable gases, with reference to the relief path ending with a flare combustor.  This is a very specific description for what is a much more general device.  I would just remove the sentence portion refering to a flare, but am not sure if there is proper general terminology that should be used to describe the general relief path in lieu of flare combustion.
128.101.142.152 (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description Too Specific
Talk:Robert Shmalo

message: What is "Competitive highlights" that exists in (Compulsory Figures)???
"U.S. compulsory figures Championships???"  --Soregashi (talk) 02:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For some years, the U.S. Figure Skating Assosciation had compulsory figures as a discipline at the national championships. The last time they were held was in 1999. Kolindigo (talk) 08:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks! --Soregashi (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?
Talk:Ballast Point (Tampa)

message: :The following discussion is closed.  Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.  
:Ballast Point (Tampa) →  – Ballast Point in Tampa, Florida is a densely populated neighborhood in the city of Tampa and should have this page for its name. Heditor6 (talk) 03:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2014 

message: :Ballast Point (Tampa) →  - The Ballast Point Lighthouse in San Diego has been demolished. The Ballast Point neighborhood in Tampa that is almost 2 square miles and has a population of almost 5,000 is far more significant than a brewery named for its neighborhood in San Diego, CA. The Ballast Point neighborhood in Tampa is well known to its nearly 5,000 residents.  Ballast Point in Tampa, Florida is clearly more significant than the area in San Diego which has no reference to it as a neighborhood on the official San Diego city website at http://www.sandiego.gov/. However the official City of Tampa has a webpage for the significant Ballast Point neighborhood in Tampa, Florida at http://www.tampagov.net/neighborhoods_webapp/default.aspx?id=1. Ballast Point in Tampa should therefore be the main topic, as Tampa is for Tampa, Florida.Heditor6 (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move - April 2014
Talk:USS Hull (DD-350)

message: I ran across a Greil Marcus essay probably of interest to whoever is working on this article: "Obsessive Memories", which is, in part, about his father, Greil Gerstley, who died on the Hull. The latter portion of the article (beginning with "But the story did appear") should be of particular interest. - Jmabel | Talk 00:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Greil Marcus essay
Talk:Bridget Namiotka

message: vipfaq.com is less a wp:reliable source than a scandal/gossip sheet. Please discuss on talk and achieve consensus to add before adding content from this source. Thanks,  -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  negative BLP
Talk:Context-sensitive solutions

message: This article was deleted for a supposed copyright violation. However, the material in question is in the public domain. The lists that appear under the sections "Qualities of a CSS Project" and "The CSS Process" are generally agreed upon by transportation planners as defining the practice of Context Sensitive Solutions. They were originally produced at a conference sponsored by the state of Maryland Department of Transportation in 1998 and have since been reproduced online in several forums, including The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Carter and Burgess (a private firm), and dozens more that can be produced with a Google search of "Qualities of Excellence in Transportation Design." 
In light of the consensus that has emerged around these principles (Federal legislation has referred to them as design criteria for the federal highway system, see SAFETEA-LU, Section 109.c.2.C), I believe it is justified and necessary to include them in this article. I have altered the citation format to make it clearer that the lists are not my words, and I re-directed the reference to point to the original document on the Maryland State Highway Administration website.
Also, there is other material in this article besides those lists, which I believe should preclude full deletion.
--Hobisfried 16:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is no longer copyvio (all the other processes still apply)
--  Drini 00:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permission 
Talk:Tan Si Chong Su

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 07:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lau Pa Sat

message: I apologize in advance that English is not my first language, and I may make some confusing mistakes. I noticed two date of the gazetted as national monuments when I translated this article from English to Japanese. The article cited website that archived Infopedia describe gazetted on 6 July 1973. But National Archives of Singapore and some books (e.g.,) describe the date on 28 June 1973. I would like to know which date is correct. --Junknote (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible that the difference may be due to when it was announced or published and when it was actually registered, for example here , it cites Government Gazette Subsidiary Legislation Supplement dated 6 July 1973, but perhaps it may have been registered earlier. If there is conflict, I'd use an earlier date which may be the actual registration date rather than the announcement date, so use  28 June 1973. I'll adjust the date. Hzh (talk) 08:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you very much for uncomplicated explanation and quick response. I can understand now. --Junknote (talk) 09:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirm the gazetted date
Talk:It's Tough to Be a Bug!

message: I'm not quite sure of it's official name, but in an Unofficial Guide to Disney World for 2008, it stated that Spacey's contract with Disney stated he wouldn't have to do any follow-up media beyond A Bugs' Life, therefor Spacey refused to do the part. The roll of Hopper in It's Tought to be a Bug is actually just an impression by one of the imagineers. If someone could get official confirmation of this, I'm positive this is true... -Unsigned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.234.80 (talk) 16:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hopper Is Not Played By Kevin Spacey 
Talk:Simon Soloveychik

message: I created this page for the second time, as it was deleted previously, for unknown reason. This time I have interpreted the Russian wikipedia information, edited suitable to wikipedia format. Hope it will stay and serve for public information, as I constantly insert valuable Soloveychik's ideas into other wikipedia pages. Abuhar 00:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gleneagles Hospital

message: According to WP:OTRS Ticket:2014032510004266, the building was an hotel until the end of 1958 and the hospital opened in 1959. Guy (Help!) 18:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please check dates 
Talk:Alexandra Hospital

message: I plan to add a picture of the gardens and a picture of the hospital soon.  I added a section about the award winning gardens and an explanation of the Indonesian sand ban.  I also plan to work on the article sometime in June.VK35 16:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are Alexandra Hospital and British Military Hospital, Singapore the same thing? If not, that should be explained. If so, the articles should be combined. Rees11 (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Military Hospital 
Talk:Tan Tock Seng Hospital

message: More references will greatly improve the rating of this article! Ng.j (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:View Road Hospital

message: The History section says "'Rimau Offices and Accommodation'. It was possibly completed in late 1941" but doesn't explain the relationship between "Rimau"and "View Road". In fact the road that is now View Road was called Rimau when I lived at 4 Rimau between 1947 and 1950. Unfortunately I cannot provide any documentary evidence that the two names refer to the same road, and for that reason I haven't tried to edit the article, but someone else may be able to provide this. In 2018 I was in Singapore for a meeting, and mentioned in my lecture that I had lived as a child at 4 Rimau but I hadn't been able to find it on a map. A student in the audience told me afterwards that his grandfather had some old maps and could probably locate it. The next day he told me that it was now View Road, and a helpful taxi driver took me there: it was easily recognizable, as it turned out to be one of the least changed places in the whole country.   Athel cb (talk) 10:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Isidoro Acevedo

message: Someone put the speedy deletion ad at the same time I was adding the last line to the biography. I think that Isidoro Acevedo is part of Argentine history, since he took place in several battles and Borges refers to him a couple of times. I think is useful information.
--Dpapic 01:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many people fought in those battles and being related to someone notable doesn't make him notable by proxy. IrishGuy talk 01:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Those are classic works of literature. This single poem isn't in that same category. IrishGuy talk 17:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I didn't say I didn't know who Borges was. I do, in fact. Borges is eminently notable. The subject of one poem (even one poem authored by Borges) is not notable. Edgar Allen Poe is notable...we don't have articles for each subject of each poem he ever wrote. IrishGuy talk 20:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Bad examples. First off, a novel by length alone is clearly different than a poem. Second, Misery was both a best selling novel and a high grossing film. Dupin not only appears in three works, but The Murders in the Rue Morgue is considered the forerunner of all modern detective fiction. How can you possibly equate those two examples to a single poem which has not had any level of global influence on culture? IrishGuy talk 22:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Relation is irrelevant. Everyone who is famous has relatives...should they all have articles? Served in combat? So did many others. They don't all get articles. Creating an article for every single character who ever appeared in the work of renowned writers would be rediculous. One mention in one poem just isn't notable. For a non-fictional person Wikipedia has very clear criteria outlined in WP:BIO which this person just doesn't meet. It isn't personal but I have the feeling you are taking this personally. Please don't. 01:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alexander Adams (sailor)

message: Okay, I live in Hawaii and am extremely well-versed in Hawaiian history, but I've never heard of this guy.  Not to say that I know it all, but I'm really not at all convinced that Alexander Adams is in any way notable.  There was no single founder of "modern Hawaii" and if there was it would be someone like King Kalākaua or the like.  This article seems excessively ethnocentric with bold assertions that Caucacians suddenly did more for Hawaii than its own native people.  At any rate, I'm leaning towards nominating this article for deletion unless some reliable sources come up showing that any of the assertions in this article are true.  —Keakealani 01:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability/factuality?
Talk:Padang, Singapore

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Victor R Savage, Brenda S A Yeoh (2004), Toponymics – A Study of Singapore Street Names, Eastern University Press. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Nanyang Technological University Libraries

message: Does this really deserve a page of it's own? Aarontay 18:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussions from Talk:Asian Communication Resource Centre

message: I proposed the merger because Wikipedia doesn't need a page for every library of every university. This could easily fit in as a section in the Nanyang Technological University article. Itsmejudith 17:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussions from Talk:NTU Humanities and social sciences library

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 18:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified
Talk:Horsburgh Lighthouse

message: I just edited the history section, because the phrasing "...the lighthouse foundation stone was laid on 24 May 1850 and was completed in 1851." means that the foundation stone was completed in 1851.  I think it's safe to assume that the original writer meant that the entire lighthouse was completed then; I just thought I'd better give a reason for my edit. -SandyJax 21:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History section
Talk:Makam Diraja Johor Telok Blangah

message: Propose to merge with the article Masjid Temenggong Daeng Ibrahim as it is co-located within the grounds of the mosque. A section will be added to Masjid Temenggong Daeng Ibrahim replace this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32cravenfan (talk • contribs) 10:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: * Support -  Your proposal makes sense, as the two are closely linked, and this article is unlikely to progress beyond a stub any time soon. Kbseah (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing a merger
Talk:Oksana Domnina

message: Why does the phrase "face makeup" link to the page "Blackface?" Even if aborigines were deliberately being mocked, that's quite a stretch. Deimos1313 (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Phototaxis

message: Jékely, G. (2009). Evolution of phototaxis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1531), 2795–2808. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0072
Sun, Y., Tian, A., Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Z., & Ma, R. (2014). Phototaxis of Grapholitha molesta (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) to Different Light Sources. Journal of Economic Entomology,107(5), 1792-1799. doi:10.1603/ec14155
Gorostiza, E. A., Colomb, J., & Brembs, B. (2016). A decision underlies phototaxis in an insect. Open Biology, 6(12), 160229. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160229
IJB043 (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources  

message: See Depth gauge#Light based depth gauges in Biology. The content is inappropriate where it is at present. Would it be useful in Phototaxis? If there is no logical objection I will move it here. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 15:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some content in depth gauge which may be more appropriate here
Talk:Erb's palsy

message: same thing, should be merged
Obviously should be merged no reason not too.  Stupid to have two of the exact same thing.  Silly eponyms
___________
New post (In other words--the one above is not mine.)
Queen Victoria:
The reference to Queen Victoria having Erb's Palsy has been added without reference/validation. This is an issue I have been stuying for some time and although I believe the statement to be correct, it would be important to know the source. 
Thank you.
Mvmag 19:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Singapore Philatelic Museum

message: The statement that the Singapore museum is "the only philatelic museum in Asia" is surely not correct.  They are found in India, Japan, Pakistan, Taipei, and Indonesia, as well.  
* National Philatelic Museum of India, Government Post Office, Calcutta
* National Philatelic Museum of India, Dak Bhavan, New Delhi
* Pakistan Postal Museum, Karachi
* Postal Museum of the Republic of China, No. 45 - Section 2, Chung King South Road - Section II
10741 Taipei
* Djakarta
* Bandoung
* Communications Museum of Japan, Ote-machi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 
Fconaway 00:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 post
Talk:Maxim Shabalin

message: Aleksandr Gorshkov (figure skater)? 203.185.57.72 (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coach
Talk:Singapore Art Museum

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* This coordinates are wrong. If you copy it to Google Map, the arrow is on the ocean.
The accurate coordinates are: 1.297484, 103.851409.
84.2.109.246 (talk) 08:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but coords are correct. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:National monuments of Singapore

message: See Wikipedia talk:SGpedians' notice board#Regarding National monuments of Singapore. HYH.124 (talk) 11:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated but still need help with the article. HYH.124 (talk) 11:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 
Talk:Free skating

message: In the on-going mission of improving this and other figure skating articles, I have removed the Zayak rule section.  Why did I do that, you ask?  First, although it was an interesting historical discussion about jumps and it an interesting figure in the sport, Elaine Zayak, it had no sources.  Second, I'm not so sure it fits in this article; perhaps it better fits into History of figure skating or into Jumps.  I regret its removal, but I think it's necessary. I replaced it with the "Requirements" section I created and wrote because it's better sourced and makes it more consistent with other articles about competition segments. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zayak rule and Requirements sections
Talk:Fort Brooke

message: Even considering the broad mission statement on the WP:WikiProject Ghost towns mission page, Fort Brooke does not fit the criteria, imo. It was a frontier fort that was decommissioned by the US government after 50 years, whereupon the residents of Tampa demolished the structures and redeveloped the land. The only traces left are a few unmarked cannons on the University of Tampa campus and a downtown parking garage bearing the name.
I'll leave it to up ghost town project members to decide if that really warrants inclusion. But it seemed in appropriate to me, so I did the "be bold" thing, you know... Zeng8r (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost town? 

message: What about Robert J. Hackley, the dispossession of his land to establish the fort, and the Supreme Court Case? See here FloridaArmy (talk) 04:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Robert J. Hackley]]