Talk:Multiple exposure

message: I suggest that this article be merged with multiple exposure because a double exposure is a particular instance of a multiple exposure, and because the multiple exposure article is far more 'complete' than this one. Calrion 14:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Multiple Exposure 

message: *I have cleaned up the section on C.E.M.E.N.T.  It would be more appropiate to start a new page which describe the software in detail.  
*I have removed the comment as that belong in the discussion page, above,and it is not a NPOV 
*Links have been cleaned up as no longer valid 
*Did a simple spell check statsone 02:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up and C.E.M.E.N.T discussion

message: Does this really qualify as a multiple exposure, rather than an altered or composite image? FiggyBee 05:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apollo 8 photo 

message: I've removed references to these jargon terms as they seem to be created by and exclusively used by the author of the CEMENT system.  I don't object to the inclusion of CEMENT provided that a citation is given to an appropriate academic paper or explicatory document. The claims about 'use of lightvectoring dating back to the 70's' need to be substantiated. -- DaveWF (talk) 04:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Lightvectoring' and 'Dusting' 

message: Under the section "Overview", the last sentence seem to have a few problems: "The simplest example of a multiple exposure is a double exposure without flash, i.e. the camera image is responsive to light twice during the complete exposure."  
As a novice on the subject, I can't decide what it's trying to say.  Is it supposed to read "with flash" instead of "without flash", or is this an example of 2 exposures -- one with flash and one without?  Or maybe even one long exposure, but with a flash (would this still be considered a "multiple exposure?).  What does "responsive to light twice during the complete exposure" mean? Leon7 (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using flash 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Multiexposer of 7 person using adobe photoshop.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Since the 1940s, almost all multiple exposures of cine film have been handled by either A/B roll printing or by an optical printer. Neither approach is mentioned here.
BTW: in the U.S. at least, the verb for moving film through a camera is not "to wind" but "to crank."Jim Stinson (talk) 23:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing important techniques 

message: It is the same with High Dynamic Range which takes multiple shots in one burst captures,
  then combines all the proper shots into one frame.[2]
does this refer to a series of exposures where each click of the shutter takes longer than the last,
the longest exposure lasting more than a full second, and typically a few seconds in length?
because 'burst' seems like a misleading misnomer when used to refer to bracketing in this context.
or
does this refer to some new technology where 'partial' exposures of the longest exposure image are saved out
at regular intervals, meaning that the entire bracketing for a single shot happens in the time required for the longest exposure?
(in which case, please provide a link to the page outlining this new technology)
please clarify. tx
Longpinkytoes (talk) 13:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarification of the Digital section 

message: The section about Iskiography doesn't belong in this article. It's just a personal digital multiple exposure project about birds.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasmin UwU88 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Iskiography section