lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Banas River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: Hello, There is also a Banas river tributary of the Son River. Yann (talk) 12:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tributary of Son river 
Talk:Barak River

message: If this article is not going to be expanded, I think that it should be merged back into the Surma-Meghna River System article.  If the topic is fully dealt with there, there is no need for a separate article here, and Barak River can just redirect to the appropriate section of that article. In June 2007 editors AA and Ragib expressed the opinion that this should be a separate article, yet almost all of the content here is from my edits to the Surma-Meghna River System article, or material I have added directly here. I would appreciate understanding the basis behind the opinions of editors AA and Ragib, especially in light of the statement in the Manual of Style that, It is a general consensus on Wikipedia that articles should not be split and split again into ever more minutiae of detail treatment, with each split normally lowering the level of notability. See, e.g. Wikipedia:Notability (fiction); Wikipedia:Notability (aircraft); and Wikipedia:Notability (books) and in general Wikipedia:Summary style#Avoiding unnecessary splits and Wikipedia:Content forking. --Bejnar (talk) 18:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having received no response in two months, I have redirected this page to Surma-Meghna_River_System#Barak which contains all of the info that was here. --Bejnar (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: The Ghagra River (Assam) as a tributary of the Barak was not found.  Does anyone have a citation for it? --Bejnar (talk) 01:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghagra River

message: The length of the entire Surma-Meghna River System is 946 km, compare the rounded 900 km value at .  The length of just the Barak portion is approximately 475 km. --Bejnar (talk) 01:55, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Length
Talk:Beas River

message: Moved from article to here, not encyclopedic content. Restrict discussion to talk page.
:Beas River actually originates from "Beaskund". It is situated at base juncture of Dhauladhar Ranges and Peerpunjal Ranges of Himalayas, just north of Rohtang Pass and can be reached on foot, climbing from Manali-Solang-Dhundhi- Buchethauch- Beaskund. It is a small fresh water pond getting water from Glaciers around and a Beas River, a small stream emerge out which is contributed by more such water channels in way to become stronger near Solang where it get a strong tributary which comes from Rohtang pass and mighty Beas River comes to existence. The video clips of Beaskund can be seen by searching on www.youtube.com as well as at www.webshots.com contributed by author.
Cheers, --Rayshade (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  User [[Pcbali]]'s text 

message: Suggest stub-classification with low importance to all categories. Cheers, --Rayshade (talk) 20:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification 

message: The photo of Beas at Pathankot seam to be Upper Bari Doab Canal rather than river Beas, which passes around 25 km south of the town.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balsumeet (talk • contribs) 03:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beas photo at Pathankot 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Beas River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004215334/http://daac.ornl.gov/rivdis/STATIONS/TEXT/INDIA/86/SUMMARY.HTML to http://daac.ornl.gov/rivdis/STATIONS/TEXT/INDIA/86/SUMMARY.HTML
 Apuldram (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have reverted the deletion by User 203.192.230.74 of the map showing the Indus river system.  This map has been in use in Wikipedia for eight years, is used in 18 pages of the EN Wikipedia and in more than 50 other Wikipedia pages.The IP user has not provided a source to justify the deletion, which is original research, and the repeated deletion constitutes edit warring.
 Before again repeating your deletion, please here explain your reason for removing the map.  You must also provide a verifiable reliable source that supports your argument.  Apuldram (talk) 11:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indus River map 

message: BC was not used in this article before the recent edits, so why do you think the change to BC is correct? Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It was changed in January 2023 by User:Rasnaboy without discussion. Prior to that, it was BC. Masterhatch (talk) 07:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then I propose to change it to BCE; Jesus Christ is irrelevant for the dating here. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 09:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MOS:VAR]]
Talk:Bhagirathi River

message: Would anyone object if we replaced the image with this one? --
thumb|left|
The swirl of sediment is a bit more dramatic.
Wilson44691 (talk) 00:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image of confluence? 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Brahmani River

message: Article completely rewritten to match up to Wiki standards-Abdaal (talk) 09:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:Chambal River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
164.100.96.254 (talk) 07:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Please give lots of details 110.227.90.221 (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the River system of Rajasthan
Talk:Daman Ganga River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Daman and Diu workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Daman and Diu or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 09:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Daman and Diu Addition
Talk:Phalgu River

message: The name should be Phalgu, as the commonly used spelling (e.g. 84000 ghits for Phalgu river vs 40000 for Falgu river, even with the Wikipedia article tilting the balance toward the latter.). It is also the name used in the map on the district website and in primary references, and is the usual transliteration of the Hindi name. Standard Hindi does not contain a native aspirant 'f'. Imc (talk) 09:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: These two articles are about the same river, only names different. Common name, I believe, is Phalgu. --SM7--talk-- 21:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, both articles describe these as different rivers, with the Phalgu River forming as the confluence of the Lilajan River and Mohana River. There is overlap in the Buddhism section, perhaps best resolved by deleting from the Phalgu River#Buddhism page to remove the duplication (but retain a link from that section to Lilajan River#Buddhism). Klbrain (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, give the uncontested objection with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Lilajan River]] with [[Phalgu River]]
Talk:Gambhir River (Rajasthan)

message: Geography of Rajasthan Dr. Hari Mohan Saxena, Ministry of Education, Government of India Rajasthan Hindi Granth Academy on page number 31 by Government of Rajasthan Gambhiri River It originates from the hills of Javad in Madhya Pradesh, it flows in Chittorgarh district, 2 km north of Chittorgarh city Bedch.  gets from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.107.225.57 (talk) 05:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Gaula River (India)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: Is this maybe the same river as Gola River? If so, the articles should be merged. --Distelfinck (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, these names refer to the same river, and are used interchangeably by people living in the region. -- ArmouredCyborg (talk) 11:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Gori River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:List of lacrosse teams in Canada

message: I really dont like the inclusion of this section.  Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  Personally, I think the list should only include teams that do, or have exsited. Resolute 05:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Once the teams are announced, we can add them but until then, it's just speculation and there's no point in including them. Jennings may want to expand to those cities, or may feel that they would be a good fit, but actually placing a team in that city is a different animal altogether. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 12:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Future teams

message: Could someone add the university field lacrosse teams? Lukeoz (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: CUFLA
Talk:Haora River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: I have added some info from 2 articles I could find. Feel free to add or correct any mistakes if you stumble upon one. 
It is lacking images of both Haora during floods and normal other times.
cheers Comfortable East (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It would be great if someone could add images
Talk:Hooghly River

message: This article should talk about when the Ganga changed course, before which I believe the Hooghly actually was the main stream of the Ganga (Hence it is sometimes called Adi Ganga (first ganges). Does anybody have info on this?HeBhagawan 05:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The most westerly and commercially the most important channel by which the Ganges enters the Bay of Bengal. It takes its distinctive name near the town of Santipur, about 120 m. from the sea. The stream now known as the Hugli represents three western deltaic distributaries of the Ganges - viz. (1) the Bhagirathi, (2) the Jalangi and (3) part of the Matabhanga. The Bhagirathi and Jalangi unite at Nadia, above the point of their junction with the lower waters of the Matabhanga, which has taken the name of the Churni before the point of junction and thrown out';new distributaries of its own. These three western distributaries are known as the Nadia rivers, and are important, not only as great highways for internal traffic, but also as the headwaters of the Hugh. Like other deltaic distributaries, they are subject to sudden changes in their channels, and to constant silting up. The supervising and keeping open of the Nadia rivers, therefore, forms one of the great tasks of fluvial engineering in Bengal. Proceeding south from Santipur, with a twist to the east, the Hugli river divides Nadia from Hugh district, until it touches the district of the Twenty-Four Parganas. It then proceeds almost due south to Calcutta, next twists to the south-west and finally turns south, entering the Bay of Bengal in 
In the 40 miles of its course above Calcutta, the channels of the Hugh are under no supervision, and the result is that they have silted up and shifted to such an extent as to be no longer navigable for sea-going ships. Yet it was upon this upper section that all the famous ports of Bengal lay in olden times. From Calcutta to the sea (about 80 m.) the river is a record of engineering improvement and success. A minute supervision, with steady dredging and constant readjustment of buoys, now renders it a safe waterway to Calcutta for ships of the largest tonnage. Much attention has also been paid to the port of Calcutta (q.v.)--Filll 03:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More material from 1911 Encyclopedia Brit.
Talk:Indravati River

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: Hi INDIA 
I am look for histori INDRABATI girl.
What a story about this girl is that of me.
Thank you in advance Syrlybek (talk) 18:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Iril River

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Vinopolis

message: The external link is to something completely different - and the London based branch of the Whisky Shop is now in Covent Garden. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reworking the article

message: There has been some activity on this front - eg a number of articles from and   (from 2022), while there a LB Southwark official document . Would 'There was some interest in 2016 in developing the site, and in 2021 Southwark Council issued a document (linking to the pdf).' cover the situation? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redevelopment of site
Talk:Conformal field theory

message: How on earth is conformal field theory of low importance? It's one of the active research areas of quantum field theory, because it's needed to state the AdS/CFT correspondence, which, in the words of the article, is "the most highly cited article in the field of high energy physics."
Warning: Once this gets a higher importance, I'll start griping about it's class rating!
Adam1729 (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject importance rating

message: There was a reference to "Critical point (mathematics)" at the end of the article. Seems a bit too elementary, maybe the editor meant
"Critical point (physics)" which is much more relevant? Applying changes, please revert if you think necessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.179.241 (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Teucrium

message: The 3rd edition of the 2 volume set Hardy Herbaceous Perennials (Portland, OR, USA) Timber Press 1990 (Translation of 1985 German edition), claims that plants represented in the trade as T. chamaedrys are usually T. massiliense or hybrids with T. lucidum, thus: T. × lucidrys, and are completely evergreen. We need a WikiProject Plants specialist to follow up on this. I add, that the germanders that I grow are very definitely semi-woody shrubs, not herbaceous perennials. C.s.auaeginal (talk) 02:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall Germander, or maybe not
Talk:Proceso (magazine)

message: I wrote again Proceso magazine "was" and not "is" prestigious today because it lost credibility after the Pinchetti affair.
Posmodern2000
The "sources" that are cited for the following assertion do not contain facts or other content that supports the substance of the assertion: "Unfortunately, it's become right-wing propaganda. [2][3]."  Please fix the sources or delete the assertion.
2600:1702:2FF0:1D00:901:9F0B:C875:11E3 (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Clare Bowditch

message: i don't think it's necessary to say they were "bemused looks" - this is the author's opinion. bemused means confused. the shots of the women on the panel and tony jones looked pleased, happy, enthralled. these are all better words than "bemused" just delete it 118.209.197.211 (talk) 08:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q&A appearance 

message: This Lead section is far too long and I am editing it without losing any information from the entire article.--Soulparadox (talk) 07:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Lead section 

message: It seems that sections of this article have been written by a fan or friend, so I have edited the article to introduce a more encyclopedic tone in those areas.--Soulparadox (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This article really needs more inline citations; I have added a few and will return to the page in due course.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations 
Talk:Manila Tytana Colleges

message: Indeed! Needs to be edited
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adinemb (talk • contribs) 07:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: General Academic Policies, Rules and Regulations

message: I don't think this should be included. It's un-encyclopedic information and is just copied off the college's website. -eniarrol- 11:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RE: General Academic Policies, Rules and Regulations
Talk:HMAS Bungaree

message: I believe that the Bungaree was named after the town of Bungaree rather than person, although it would seem likely that the town was named after the person. This was the case for all the Corvettes which were all named after Australian towns. Strictly speaking the corvettes were mine sweepers but were used in many other roles. But given the fact that they were named after Australian towns would suggest that the Bungaree was also Neilsambhur (talk) 22:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the name selected by the Adelaide Steamship Company. The RAN generally retained the names of civilian ships that entered its service during World War II, which explains most of the unusual names at List of ships of the Royal Australian Navy. The RAN's website also confirms that the ship was named after the person . Nick-D (talk) 10:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Bungaree
Talk:Fatso Jetson

message: How are the the originators of desert rock when Kyuss formed in 1989?
Answer: Have you *heard* wretch?  Not at all the same style.
On the main page, it states that Kyuss are a 'younger' band. 
Also, on Fatso Jetson's page, it says they are considered to have created desert rock. But they formed in 1994, the year that '...Sky Valley' was released.
Answer to the above comments:
The "originators" comment refers to not Fatso Jetson persay but other groups such as Across the River, Yawing Man, The sort of Quartet, and various other bands that Mario Lalli was a founding member, these bands starting with Across the river (1983-1986)then Yawning Man(1987-present)Sort of Quartet(1989-1998) combined the influence of heavy rock ,punk and experimenting with jazz and many other musical genres. These band have been said to be an influence on other desert musicians in exploring beyond the confines of the popular notion of rock or punk .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.104.201 (talk) 08:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Older discussions

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Tlapanec language

message: mismatches between the infobox and the text on the number of speakers seems to be common on wikipedia, but this is the biggest difference I've seen... is it 75,000 or only 10? --Krsont 11:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 75,000 according to the external link. I've changed it. --WikiSlasher 12:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  75,000 sounds exaggerated but 10 is far too little. I think i just copied the infobox from some tiny language and didn't change the number. Thanks.Maunus 12:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of speakers 
Talk:Negishi Line

message: Could the editor who is doing ... I don't know what to "translate" the Japanese versions of the page and replace the current version wholesale kindly knock it off. The article was perfectly readable before, but after your changes became totally illegible. It is quicker and easier to revert the article entirely to the previous version and then restore subsequent edits one by one than it is to rewrite the dog's breakfast you left it as. 2400:406D:78F:100:702E:8C22:3388:423B (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonfluent translation