Talk:Human penis size/Archive 3

message: WARNING WIKIPEDIA is quoting an alleged RACIST, i.e. Mr Rushton of University of Western Ontario, as such this source cannot be considered valid. If a copy of this article were to be sent to news organizations, the editors of this article might not enjoy the scrutiny. See the following references:
* http://bethuneinstitute.org/documents/racialscientestrushton.html --> "Racial Scientist Rushton Takes Over Pioneer Fund", an organization associated with eugenics.
* http://www.onepeoplesproject.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=130&Itemid=29 -->"Jean Philippe Rushton ... the father of the modern day scientific and intellectual racists"
--24.200.55.19 15:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You won't be able to take a NPOV on the subject if you only quote anti-racists.  Rushton is a controversial scientist, but one who has supporters in the scientific community, publishes in mainstream journals, and maintains his professorship at the University of Western Ontario.--Ty580 05:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rushton not a reliable source? 

message: penis section exludes information about hispanic/latino men.  The sources cited are a seemingly random assortment of studies, none of which discuss hispanics/latinos to any extent, nor do they provide conclusive, statistically significant findings.  The mess in this section is equivalent to googling the words penis, size, and race, and picking the top results and copying and pasting.  The wikipedia article on race also identifies many other groups not clearly defined as part of any of the current sources.  What are some of them considered? the Indians, Alaskan Natives, American Indians, Jewish People, Arabs, Northern or Eastern Europeans, East Africans, Indigenous Australians? Are any of these groups even represented by the current sources appearing in this section? We don't need to, nor can we discuss every group of people that consider themselves their own race, but this section is dire need of clean-up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.186.205.102 (talk) 16:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race and Penis Size 

message: The LifeStyle data shouldn't be put in a summary graph on the side.  It looks too authorative, and, for goodness sake, how accurate can a study done on Spring Break in Cancún, Mexico, possibly be?  This screams selection bias.--75.73.227.22 02:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LifeStyle data 

message: I went to the Sex museum in Amsterdam and there was a picture of a man who had a 47cm penis, I remember this was the exact length. I am almost certain it was real. I can't get a reference because my webpage blocker won't let me search for it, but it should be a useful addition if a reference is found. Bobbacon 14:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's just a picture, I would suspect Photoshop was involved. (47cm is 18.5 in, for those who prefer Imperial units.) What could you do with a penis that big anyway? Rosemary Amey 03:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: length

message: i am 14 and my peins size whean erict is 5.5 inches is this a normal size whean it is not erict it is 3.5 inches
:It sounds normal enough, but even if it wasn't, there is nothing you can do to change your penis size so there is no point worrying about it. (And why do so many people want to be "normal" when it comes to sex? In other areas of life, we don't worry about being normal. Is it "normal" for me to be a vegan? No, and I wouldn't have it any other way! Is it normal to have blue eyes? You could argue it isn't, because statistically most people have brown eyes--yet no one is criticizing us blue-eyed freaks of nature. Is it normal for me to listen to classical music most of the time, instead of top 40? Who cares! Normal is boring and over-rated; it is people's differences that make them interesting.) Rosemary Amey 03:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  is my size normal 

message: Don't really use this much so I dunno if I'm following the protocols or not, but I just wanted to point out that in Britain "Asian" usually refers to south Asian (from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka or Bangladesh), whilst East Asians are usually referred to as whatever their country of origin is or as "other Asian". This may lead to some confusion and discrepancies between the reports of the different studies (in the race section). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 143.167.228.127 (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear on "Asian" 

message: That article could easily be nailed at AfD for original research/trivia/dicdef, but I just did the WP:BOLD thing and am merging and redirecting.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 22:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I've just redirected [[size queen]] here, and will merge a small amount of content

message: :: Read your link. It was only a survey. No one was actually measured (not verifiable). And it goes on to say that any size difference is due to cultural differences in diet, and not actual genetic differences between Caucasian, Negroid, and Mongoloid (White, Black, and Asian).
::Wits 18:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: online surveys