Talk:Pediatrics

message: Renamed section - previously just 'education' (which at ifrst I thought to mean paediatrics within education, rather than academic training/requirements)
Also, it's solely about the US requirements and standards, I don;t know enough to update it myself, but it should be flagged as such.--Cooper-42 14:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic Training Section 

message: I am deleting a reference to 'jasmine brown', said to be a famous pediatrician, as I can't find any reference to her.
--DavidB 21:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  history section 

message: Changed it to be more congruous with the title except where it was a proper title. Seriously? American Association of Paediatrics? 71.178.20.195 (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instances of Paediatrician/Pediatrician 

message: [in exaggerated "Australian-criminal" accent] As spellin' is required to be consistent throughout all Wikipedia articles, we are editing this article and changing the name of the journal Pediatrics (journal) to "Paediatrics" and the American Academy of Pediatricians to the American Academy of "Paediatricians" in accordance to Wiki policies ....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.24.203.245 (talk) 12:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wookie-"paedia" 

message: "The age limit of such patients ranges from 12 to 81 with the average age limit being 64 or 65 years of age."
I believe this statement to be false, don't have time to look up sources right now, but that age range is completely wrong. I'm deleting the sentence for now, but hopefully someone who knows or has sources can fix it. DrazharLn (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodgy dates in introduction 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: It is a pity there is photo of Hôpital des Enfants Malades, as this is claimed to be the first children's hospital (not Gt Ormond St). Can anyone source one? Zohre6 (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  photograph of Great Ormond St Hospital 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Pediatrics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060418235455/http://www.nyc.gov/html/hhc/jacobi/html/second_level/geninfo.html to http://www.nyc.gov/html/hhc/jacobi/html/second_level/geninfo.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714221631/http://www.rcsed.ac.uk/RCSEDBackIssues/journal/vol44_4/4440019.htm to http://www.rcsed.ac.uk/RCSEDBackIssues/journal/vol44_4/4440019.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 1. Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?
The addition of pharmacokinetic properties greatly improved this article. Under Absorption, should "decreased acid section" be decreased acid secretion?" Also under Elimination's "normally developed kidneys," may be "full developed kidneys?"
2. Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?
This group did achieve their goals and acted information on pharmacokinetics and dosing factors. 
3. Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style?
Yes, the format is consistent with Wikipedia's manual of style.
Fannnypack (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanny's Peer Review for UCSF Foundations 2 2019, Group 7c goals