lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Revue de Synthèse

message: The article has been actualized on Dec. 8thEb2 (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Love seeing journal articles going up at Wiki. Thanks to all involved. Congratulations on a very informative ... and good looking! ... article. :) Alastair Haines (talk) 17:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations!
Talk:Hughenden Valley

message: I've lived locally for ~25 years and I can't recall hearing the village (as opposed to the valley itself) called "Hughenden Valley", only ever as "Hughenden". DDFoster96 (talk) 19:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Arizona wine

message: A list of wineries in Arizona seems like a manageable task that I'd be happy to do.  Would it be appropriate for the page? JamesLucas (talk) 05:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the wineries are notable enough to already have a Wikipedia article created about them, feel free to add the blue links. Ideally, it would be nice if the links are include in prose about the wineries' impact in the Arizonian wine industry (See WP:WINEGUIDE for more details) rather than list format though which can seem awfully directory-like. AgneCheese/Wine 05:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winery list
Talk:British Army order of precedence

message: Does anyone have the information to expand this to include historical orders of precedence? I was working on the Queen's Regiment article and couldn't work out who came after them in the order. (Answer; it was the King's Regiment.)Yorkist (talk) 08:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Orders of Precedence

message: I'm sure that "right" and "left" are well-defined with regard to parading, but am I right to assume that "right" means "first" and "left" means last? TIA, --Tim Landscheidt (talk) 11:37, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "From right to left"
Talk:Fructose-2,6-bisphosphate 2-phosphatase

message: Hi all,
I propose a merge with the site Phosphofructokinase 2 as it seems a little redundant to have both. Since this article has less information, I think it would be best to just incorporate the information in the Function section of the PFK-2 page as opposed to having different sites. Let me know what you think! Kedrosolan (talk) 02:06, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Phosphofructokinase 2
Talk:Lateran Palace

message: Are there any images of the original Lateran Palace that Sixtus V tore down? john k (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of the original 

message: The first paragraph, "Pre-Papal History," mentions only the basilica, not the palace itself -- but nowhere is there a statement of when the original palace (or the basilica) was first constructed, only when it was given over to the papacy. Anybody know? --Michael K SmithTalk  18:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built when? 

message: This article needs attention from a copy editor; the author wrote almost the entire article in the passive voice.  Help, please! Foreignshore (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor needed 

message: From what I understand, the Palace is on Italian soil, but owned by the Vatican and having diplomatic status (similar to an embassy). Is that correct? If so, the information should be in the lede, because otherwise readers might infer that the Palace is in Vatican City. Mathew5000 (talk) 22:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an extraterritorial piece of the Vatican. Not sure what status that has in international law. Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think you may be incorrect in that. As I understand it, the palace is extraterritorial property of the Vatican, not a “piece” of the Vatican. But I haven't found a reliable third-party source that explains it clearly. Mathew5000 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What country is the palace in? 
Talk:The Lee

message: Ought this page not be called The Lee instead of Lee? ChilternGiant (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree the current name is The Lee which is currently a redirect to Lee which was its name in 18/early 19th century. So it would be correct if you or I could do a move assuming no other editors objects. Any views out there?Tmol42 (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection here. -- roleplayer 21:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks and sorted.Tmol42 (talk) 22:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title
Talk:Lillingstone Dayrell

message: It might be worth adding that this village, with others, was by the end of the 18th Century, already part of an estate which changed hands among City millionaires.   Two owners were the Baring family and Abrham Robartsm banker, East India Director and West India factor, MP for Worcester from 1797-1816, who bought it from the Barings (see Robarts's will)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.68.44 (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it would be worth adding but only if you can provide a proper citation (see WP:Citing sources) - "see Robart's will" is not enough since I don't know how any of us could see this will. Don't worry about how to do the footnotes, just put the source material in brackets and someone else will come along and prettify it.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Little Marlow

message: This: There are two nice pubs in the village called the Queens Head and the Kings Head. Both are friendly and welcoming. seems to be opinion, not verifiable fact.81.131.65.202 (talk) 17:14, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion? 
Talk:Little Missenden

message: The Little Missenden population figure is misleading as it applies to the whole parish (including Little Kingshill, Hyde Heath and Holmer Green) and not LM village alone. Unfortunately, an alternative figure for LM Ward also includes much more than just LM village. I suspect LM village alone has a population only circa 500 people but I don't have an 'official' figure to hand. --Proteus4 (talk) 18:11, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Missenden population figure
Talk:Loughton, Milton Keynes

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Denbigh, Buckinghamshire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: How is this town/region pronounced locally? The article currently says (Lou-tun), which is not IPA but seems to me to suggest that it is  (rhyming with lou or loo). However, this article http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A19773499 appears to suggest that it is  (rhyming with low). Can someone confirm which it is? Or both/either? Or something else?? Neither is to be confused, of course, with Loughton, Essex, which is ... Mooncow (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's 'lou' as in 'lousy'. Could you put that into IPA? ninety:one   21:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That'll be , the same as the Essex place.  Is there a specific reason you used "lousy" as the example?  I'll amend the article. -- roleplayer 11:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't have time to look up the IPA, sorry! Thank you. ninety:one   12:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Someone added some material about the historic parishes of Great Loughton and Little Loughton. A published source for this info would be appreciated, please! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic parishes 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Bobes66

message: User:Bobes66
    run at Tue Nov 27 19:15:07 2007 GMT
Mainspace              12
Talk:                  3
User talk:             1
User:                  1
Wikipedia:             4
avg edits per page     1.75
earliest               15:21, 11 November 2007
number of unique pages 12
total                  21
2007/11  21
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
           Mainspace
6 Volkswagen Polo Coupe S Mk 2
2 Volkswagen Polo
             Talk:
2 Volkswagen Polo Coupe S Mk 2
           Wikipedia:
3 Requests for adminship/Bobes66
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 19:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Bobes66
Talk:Ponte Milvio

message: In Moccia's film Scusa ma ti chiamo amore, there is a shot of somebody breaking locks on the bridge.
I didn't pick up why.
Could you mention it in the article?
--Error (talk) 19:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scusa ma ti chiamo amore 
Talk:Ponte Sant'Angelo

message: Wait a minute... The pilgrims sucked cocks? Who wrote that? Can somebody please change that?
Greetings,
Wouter from Holland  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.123.178.18 (talk) 18:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: "Pons Aelius, meaning the Bridge of Hadrian"... I don't think so... Pons Aelius translates as the Bridge of Aeolius, or Aeolian Bridge, surely?
Elio1 (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pons Aelius, meaning the Bridge of Hadrian, 

message: The photo currently displayed on this article (Sant'Angelo bridge, dusk, Rome, Italy.jpg), while extremely beautiful, also seems to be more artistic than accurate when compared to street views on Google maps. The large domed building featured prominently in the picture (Saint Peter's Basilica) has been photoshopped in, as it is not actually located so close to this bridge. Other background buildings, as well as the horizon line, have all been photoshopped to appear closer than they really are.  There may be other inaccuracies, but these are the most offensive. I do not myself have a better picture to replace it with, so I hope someone else does. I viewed this google maps view in order to arrive at this conclusion: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9016456,12.4664612,3a,75y,273.24h,75.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sVUGN219SYKkqw98kKZiZTg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DVUGN219SYKkqw98kKZiZTg%26cb_client%3Dsearch.gws-prod.gps%26w%3D211%26h%3D120%26yaw%3D141.8043%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu. Mistsong10 (talk) 10:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This has nothing to do with photoshop, the effect is just obtained with a telephoto lens. Alex2006 (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographic Accuracy?
Talk:Cacodemon

message: In Christopher Fry's play, The Lady's Not for Burning, 1948, Thomas Mendip (pretending to be Satan) says (if memory serves) "...My incubae and succubai, my imps and cacodemons would leap from their baths of boiling brimstone, shouting Eureka! Cherchez la femme!" Wikipedia has quite an entry on this play.Jim Stinson (talk) 20:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern references
Talk:Executive Vice President of the European Commission for A Europe Fit for the Digital Age

message: Please see Talk:List of European Commission portfolios.- J.Logan`t: 19:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

message: Is there any reason why every country has its correct flag but isn't linked to its wiki page? IchBinEuerHeld (talk) 17:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries not linked
Talk:United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia

message: http://www.un.org/depts/dpko/missions/unomig/background.html states "The conflict [...] escalated into a series of armed confrontations in the summer of 1992 [...]" and "[the] ceasefire agreement was reached on 3 September 1992 in Moscow by the Republic of Georgia, the leadership of Abkhazia and the Russian Federation [...]" yet the article starts out stating there was a cease-fire treaty on July 27th. Should we change it so that it matches the information provided on the UN website?
airstrike (talk) 00:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Cease-fire Treaty Date 
Talk:History of the Los Angeles Police Department

message: I just added section headers to break up the article, but they should not be taken as "canonical"—fix them as you like.—DocWatson42 (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 
Talk:S1PR2

message: ==Untitled==
A recent study (write-up at https://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/26889.aspx ) indicates that S1PR2 has an important role in allowing cells to cross the blood-brain barrier and seems strongly correlated to areas of inflammation in the brains of persons with MS. I lack the domain knowledge to write this up but if anyone is following this page it might be worth creating a section or note on it as it has the potential to become an important area of research for MS prevention and treatment. AshleyGittins (talk) 23:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role in blood-brain barrier migration and Multiple Sclerosis 

message: A recent study (write-up at https://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/26889.aspx ) indicates that S1PR2 has an important role in allowing cells to cross the blood-brain barrier and seems strongly correlated to areas of inflammation in the brains of persons with MS. I lack the domain knowledge to write this up but if anyone is following this page it might be worth creating a section or note on it as it has the potential to become an important area of research for MS prevention and treatment. AshleyGittins (talk) 23:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Abennett4541 (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I
Talk:155 mm gun M1

message: A World War II veteran , that died two weeks ago, told me, some years ago, that this weapon was amazing:precise, reliable, long range and available in great numbers.He used it in Italy, between 1944 and 1945.Agre22 (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a link to the army's page for General Westervelt which includes a few sentences on the army's review of its artillery. The (155 mm gun M1) article still says the M1's development was influenced by the "Westervelt Board" (named in his honor). So why remove the link and claim it is "Not an appropriate link". W102102 (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development: Why remove link to Westervelt Board ?
Talk:Athol Public Library (Massachusetts)

message: The Athol Wiki article cites to an external link, the homepage for the Athol Public Library. I'm not sure that it's notable enough for its own Wiki page.Res05e (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved the page to "Athol Public Library (Massachusetts)" because there are a lot of places called Athol, many of them with their own libraries. I'd assumed this was an article about Athol Public Library in Athol, New Zealand (and stubbed it accordingly) - then remembered there was an Athol in Canada so I checked the link. Turned out it was neither of them. Grutness...wha? 00:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  page move 

message: Text is now in the article for Athol, Mass.Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 08:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Athol
Talk:Shuffle track

message: Terms such as zone and subsection are used as if they are well-known.Autarch (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained terminology 

message: This discussion is taking place at Blackjack.Aabcxyz (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Informal Motion to Remove All References Placed by Objective3000 in Blackjack, Card counting, and Shuffle track and Wherever They May Also Appear in Wikipedia Articles to His Self-published Commercial Websites qfit and blackjackincolor
Talk:Bodhi Day

message: The article states that outside of Japan, Bodhi Day is celebrated on the 8th day of the 12th lunar month in the Chinese calendar, which would mean that it changes every Gregorian year. However, if you Google "Bodhi Day", you find that it's December 8 every year (such as on this BBC calendar). Has this been standardized across all sects? howcheng  {chat} 17:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to Vesākha gives some additional information on the lunar calendar & the day of this celebration. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not exactly what I meant. Let's try it another way: If some countries celebrate it on the lunar calendar, then why do all the search results fix the day on December 8? According to http:// www.prokerala.com/general/calendar/chinese-year-converter.php (site is on the spam blacklist), the 8th day of the 12th lunar month will be January 1, 2012, but searching for "Bodhi Day January 2012" doesn't get you any result that shows Bodhi Day as being observed that day. So what gives? howcheng  {chat} 21:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Though, after some more searching: Wesak Day is akin to Bodhi Day, yet not exactly the same. I hope this explains part of the difference. Still, I don't know how this lunar calendar works. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of observance 

message: I was hoping the article would give me some info about where the name "Bodhi Day" comes from. No luck. It does not seem to be translation of any name used in Asian countries. Sounds like a bit of an odd neologism to me. But, that said, I have no idea what we'd call this article if it weren't called "Bodhi Day", since it's called different things in different East Asian countries. Chinese people and Japanese Zen agree on 臘八, but they pronounce that quite differently.
I guess you could think of Bodhi Day as a very loose translation of 成道会, which is literally "Attain Path Gathering".– Greg Pandatshang (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Henry Surtees

message: Edited a little bit about the accident. Wikipedia isnt a newspaper (Bits like "Today Henry Surtees had a...").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.90.110 (talk) 16:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really.  Time and cause of death are determined post-mortem, not at the scene; the local rescue team and medical centre have life support systems that would have used regardless of how dire the situation was.  There are also, of course, multiple definitions of death. Aubergine (talk) 04:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juan Valdez Café

message: Removed :Category:Industrial Workers of the World, couldn't figure out what it had to do with this article. Been on the article since 2007. Took a wild guess and it looks like the original author of this article had done a bit of a rough copy-and-edit of Starbucks and accidentally included it.
* 
* 
Noting background/research of this edit for posterity. djr13 (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union category removal background 
Talk:Sarah Van Patten

message: here are some so far unused refs:
In a review of Romeo & Juliet, Dance Critic Rachel Howard states, “Van Patten was not afraid to look immature, even goofy. Her giggles with her girlfriends were not demure twitters but silly chest-heaving laughs. When she first met Romeo in the ballroom and pulled her hand away from his, teasing, you could see how ill-prepared this sheltered jokester was for a love of such intensity. In the balcony scene, she made her sudden series of pique arabesque look slightly awkward, like the tottering steps of a newborn foal. In the marriage scene, when she restrained herself from clinging to Romeo and then rushed at him again, her inability to control herself was so childlike that she actually provoked a big laugh from the audience. Van Patten is a thoroughly naturalistic actress.”
http://rachelhoward.com/archives/2005/05/van_pattens_jul.php
Renee Renouf, of Ballet.co magazine calls Sarah, “a special dramatic force.”   
http://www.ballet.co.uk/magazines/yr_07/apr07/rr_rev_sfb3_0307.htm
Alan Ulrich of The Voice of Dance observed in a review of Apollo that, “I have never seen the Calliope solo dispatched with the character details brought to it by Sarah Van Patten”
http://www.voiceofdance.org/Insights/features.test.cfm?LinkID=31500000000000208
Interview with Sarah as one of San Francisco Ballet’s “Up and Coming Stars”
Pointe Magazine, October / November 2006. pp. 38-44.
Reference to her Romeo & Juliet in Copenhagen (in Danish)
http://www.old.kglteater.dk/dkt2002/omteatret/regnskab/2000/beretning/2/teater.html
Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Double R Racing

message: I come from the 2022 W Series article mentioning Fine Moments. The link leads here, but there's no mention of Fine Moments anywhere on the article. Is this a linking error or is the article just hasn't been updated yet? Klrfl Talk! 12:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fine Moments
Talk:Prince Edward Island dollar

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:CAN-S1929c-Bank of Prince Edward Island-1 Dollar (1877).jpg and subsequent will be appearing as picture of the day on July 1, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-07-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:CAN-S1929c-Bank of Prince Edward Island-1 Dollar (1877).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Alexander Dahl

message: It's not possible to show the Earth's curvature that clearly at a height of 11,300m, which is the cruising altitude of modern airliners. The photograph most probably just shows barrel distortion caused by the lens. Also, the article is completely unsourced. --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Jeremy Maclin

message: but that was before WR top competitor in the draft Michael Crabtree revealing in a medical examination of two inches in lowered height to 6' 1. I don't know because of the way this is typed what it means?? It makes no sense.204.193.194.59 (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, it's totally irrelevant, since Oakland did not take Crabtree or Maclin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by InsultComicDog (talk • contribs) 00:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 
Talk:The Long Valley

message: Being that the page for The Chrysanthemums is now a redirect to this page and not a proper article, I'm removing the brackets around it so it will not appear to be a linked page, to reduce confusion on the part of the reader. If anyone would like to actually write a page about The Chrysanthemums, you're welcome to put back the link. 169.231.41.53 (talk) 04:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection Blues
Talk:Angela Summers

message: The article had two different cities of birth and sources give conflicting birth dates. I took the info out for lack of WP:RELIABLE sources. -• Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth info 

message: First paragraph was copyvio of IMDb "biography." -• Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early career section 
Talk:Aeromarine AS

message: Two articles for the same aircraft=merge time.Petebutt (talk) 16:21, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They are United States Navy designations so this (Aeromarine AS) would be the correct article title. One AS-1 and two AS-2s were built under the naval "AS" designation. MilborneOne (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Talk:Queen's Truncheon

message: This page has been moved (renamed) in error (and without reference).
The Queen's Truncheon remains known as such (and is not designated 'The King's Truncheon') despite the recent death of HM Queen Elizabeth II. This is linked to its award by Queen Victoria.  MFBRGR (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Nomenclature