lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:South Norwalk station

message: I have posted the coords for this station as  since the two station buildings are southwest of the Monroe Street underpass.  Unfortunately, the people at google maps have placed a "South Norwalk" station icon on their map page to the northeast of the Monroe Street underpass.  Northeast of the underpass has no train platform, rather to the north is an apartment complex and to the east is the main Norwalk police building.  But there is no train station at the location that google maps has erroneously labelled.  Persons using maps at google are encouraged to switch to the satellite photos and zoom in close to see where the station is (at the coords I have listed).  The New York  bound station building is incorporated into the large parking garage building.  I hope that information helps to more accurately locate the station. 67.86.73.252 (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading station marker at google maps. 

message: Please add more parking information.  Does one have to have a permit? If there is meter parking, how much does it cost? Is there usually space if one arrives in the middle of the day? Is there a number to call for parking information?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  parking info 

message: For an article like this station, which has an interesting and somewhat complicated track layout, it might be helpful to have a track diagram. If you ever have a chance, would you consider creating track maps for stations like this? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I'd be willing to do these track diagrams. The source material would be track maps that can't be publicly downloaded anymore, but it's doable. epicgenius (talk) 18:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: 2010 NEC master plan (page 90 of the PDF) leaves off the outer sidings, but is otherwise accurate and still publicly available. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track map
Talk:Waterbury Union Station

message: I'm not complaining about the split, but when this article was renamed from Waterbury (Metro-North station) to Waterbury Union Station, the revision history of this issue went back to the Metro-North station talk page when it shoudl be here. Can anybody fix this? ----DanTD (talk) 23:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  By-product of the split 

message: The only former railroad listed at Waterbury seems to be the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad. Since this was a Union Station, I assume other railroads used this station, but I don't see any of the others here. ----DanTD (talk) 13:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Station, but what other railroads? 

message: A reader has supplied a new photo:
:File:Waterbury Union Station 2013.jpg
The current infobox photo is from 1960, while this is more current. I'll leave it to other editors to determine whether this new photo should replace any in the article, or be added to the article.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Photo
Talk:Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute

message: The entry entitled the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute is not a candidate for rapid deletion as the material it contains is not a direct copy of already available information (such as the web page of the institute) but rather a synthesis and updated synopsis of it with links to other Wikipedia pages relevant to the institution. The page is for information only and is not advertising or selling services. It does not violate copyright and is verifiable. Hopefully the page can be fully reinstated.
Jwoodget 18:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Minnesota Iceman

message: I'm surprised that former Don Post masks co-owner and costume maker Verne Langdon 's detailed explanation of the hoax (complete with a reference to his previous discussion of the matter in Cult Movies magazine is being brushed aside.  Perhaps Pickled Punks & Girlie Shows: A Life Spent on the Midways of America by Rick West could be of use for adding additional material about the iceman being hoax.  More information (and pictures of the the original iceman model taken in 2002) can be found here.
AtomicMysteryMonster (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Minnesota Iceman is a hoax 

message: To stop the spread of misinformation I have update what was previous thought with recent new information. 47.151.33.105 (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing cited text  and misrepresenting an article in Scientific American  wasn't an improvement. - - LuckyLouie (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated with new relevant information.
Talk:Hawkins class cruiser

message: The AA guns "as completed" need to be sorted out. Specifically, the 4 x QF 3-inch 20 cwt are listed twice. 
Also : "Hawkins carried only the 12 pounder anti-aircraft (A/A) guns, her sisters having two (Raleigh) or three (Frobisher, Effingham) QF 4 inch Mark V guns on mountings HA Mark III." The 12-pounders i.e. QF 12 pounder 12 cwt, were not AA guns (HA), they were surface guns (LA). The statement doesn't make sense.
I suspect the writer has confused the QF 12 pounder 12 cwt with the QF 3 inch 20 cwt. I don't think cruisers of that era were armed with QF 12 pounder 12 cwt. Rcbutcher (talk) 12:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AA guns are a mess 
Talk:Cincinnati and Richmond Railroad

message: Does anyone know when the branch to the state line, opened in 1863, was abandoned? Was it actually not abandoned until recently? It may have still existed in 1984, but I can't find it on any employee timetables or CT1000 forms going back to 1945 (though the 1945 CT1000 does list "JC" Tower at Richmond Junction/Glen - or was this where the line from Cinci joined the line from Columbus?), and it's not on ca. 1925 division maps. Maybe it was reclassified as a yard track? It could have been abandoned as early as 1869, when the two Columbus-Richmond lines were placed under common operation, but an 1890s map shows it. --NE2 17:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad

message: The MARC station in Perryville MD carries stones near the roof that read 1905 and P.W.B.  If the PW&B was fully integrated into the PRR by 1902, why did the station not carry PRR hallmarks? Bill S. (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do the stones really read "P.W.B."? Or do they perhaps read "P.B.W.", for Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington, the PRR subsidiary into which the PW&B was swept in 1902? PRRfan (talk) 03:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perryville, MD station
Talk:Fiji-class cruiser

message: "All ships of the Crown Colony-class were decommissioned from the Royal Navy by the late 1960s, though none of them were the last cruisers of the Royal Navy. That honour went to Blake, a modified Tiger-class cruiser, which was decommissioned in 1980, seemingly the last ever cruiser to be in the Royal Navy."
weren't the Invincible class Aircraft carriers originally designated "through deck cruisers"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.221.149 (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  last cruiser 

message: Does anyone have any sources that support the different machinery, speed and displacement for the Ceylon sub-class? Everything I can find state they’re the same, just different armament. Cavalryman (talk) 12:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different machinery for the Ceylon group
Category talk:PATCO Speedline

message: Okay, PATCO is and has always been a division of the Delaware River Port Authority.  As such, I think this should be a sub-category of the DRPA cat.  I know the train sites all have a devoted and distinct following so I wanted to solicit other opinions before I made the change.  This is a frienly suggestion so let me know what you think. RevelationDirect (talk) 22:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, nearly four years and I never saw this message. Do you have a DRPA cat? If so, it would be perfect for this. ----DanTD (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Making a sub-category of DRPA cat
Talk:15–16th & Locust station

message: This station is listed on PATCO's page with the wheelchair icon.  How is this handled?  There is an elevator lift from the train platform to the turnstyle mezanene?  Is there an elevator to the street level or to Broad Street Line trains?
Njbob (talk) 09:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:City Hall station (PATCO)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Camden NJ (1943-1953) station. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Camden NJ (1943-1953) station" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lindenwold station

message: According to PATCO sources (which are not available online), Lindenwold has 3337 spaces, but according to the NJ Transit website, the spaces in the lots add up to 3235 spaces. Where did the extra 102 spaces come from?   —  Rickyrab | Talk 20:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of spaces at Lindenwold
Talk:Atlantic City Rail Terminal

message: Update link to New York Times  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.159.124 (talk) 19:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

message: This article needs details about Amtrak service in Atlantic City Mfs1013 (talk) 17:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Amtrak Service
Talk:Belvidere Delaware Railroad

message: This article continued to fall out of what is considered standard wiki guidelines for writing an article. To whom it may concern, please be more thorough when contributing to this article. It should read like an encyclopedia entry. Please be conscious of WP:OWN issues as well. For tips on how to write a concise railroad history article, see entries like Western Maryland Railway, New York, Ontario and Western Railway, and particularly Unadilla Valley Railway. Thank you. Oanabay04 (talk) 04:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Lower Trenton Bridge

message: I have watched the opening credits to House several times now on TV and then slowed down on my computer, and I have never been able to see the Trenton Makes anywhere. You can clearly see the Carnegie Lake and the Washington Street Bridge, but not the Trenton Makes. Its a distinct landmark. Unless anyone out there has a picture or screenshot, I'm going to change the article. I'm not going to remove the comment entirely, because you can see the bridge in another popular show - The Sopranos - and I'll change it to reflect that. BethEnd 04:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Seen in House

message: It might need to be made clearer, when it is said "The bridge was originally a toll bridge operated by the Trenton Delaware Bridge Company. It opened on January 30, 1806...," that the statement refers to an entirely different structure. Yes, it IS stated farther down that the bridge was rebuilt several times, but the language used seems to me to suggest that the discussion concerns a single structure.PurpleChez (talk) 19:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Article photos and all other photos I've found show the motto across two spans of the bridge. The 2012 film "One for the Money" has the whole motto appearing on a single span (very first scene immediately after opening credits). Must have been computer generated? -- Rairden (talk) 08:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd appearance in film (Popular culture section)
Talk:Auburndale station (LIRR)

message: My old stomping grounds; I grew up in the Auburndale section of Flushing, just a half-mile from the station!  I'd love to see what it looks like now.  Anybody else on here grew up near this station?  It was always pretty spare & modest for an LIRR station, but it being so close to my house, it was so sweet to have!  I've always loved the LIRR, it has been such an important transportation option for NYC and Long Island for well over a hundred years now! BobCubTAC (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Growing up nearby 
Talk:Morris Park Facility

message: my source is a track map that i downloaded that refers to the platform as boland's landing, and when a m7 set is making a scheduled stop there, the computer will announce boland's landing. <- add lirrhistory.com to the sources
:I don't know who posted this, but I say Morris Park Facility, and Boland's Landing ought to be split. ----DanTD (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:OpenLDI

message: This page is very wrong, at least from the POV of this engineer. OpenLDI is a signaling standard for LCD panels that is normally within the LCD panel itself (connecting the DVI/VGA receiving chipset to the actual TFT panel), not between a PC and an LCD monitor. What SGI did was an external, non-standard version of it. For example, see the National DS90C387/88 pair. I will try to clean up this article some time tonight or this weekend... — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 18:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 

message: I reached the OpenLDI page from a theatre page listing LDI. The two are very different. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prhampton (talk • contribs) 
:I don't know the theater term, but I reworked your LVDS changes. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 01:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LDI <> OpenLDI 
Talk:Eve Online/Archive 1

message: I'm pretty sure the same account can't be logged in to twice... --Tom Edwards 18:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't use the term 'player' because a single player can have multiple accounts, so you don't know exactly how many players are logged in at any time. Feel free to change it to an alternative wording if you wish though. --Davril2020 18:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont think it matters.  "Players" which could be wrong because of multiple accounts - is what the eve website says itself.  You can't have more than one avatar per account on at the same time, so "avatar" also works.  And of course "accounts" work too (and I think makes the most sense.  Just my .02USD.  --ShakataGaNai 17:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  re: changing 'player' to 'avatar' 

message: The word motherships was replaced with the word dreadnoughts in the Red Moon Rising section recenlty, according to this  page Dreadnoughts were introduced in Cold War Edition, and motherships were introduced in Red Moon Rising , this is also supported by the patch notes for RMR  (you will need to be logged in to eve-online.com to view the patch notes) they are duplicated here . I will revert the article to say Motherships rater than Dreadnoughts. Richard Slater 18:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motherships replaced with Dreadnoughts 

message: Removed evecast link as per Spam policy. Please do not add external links as a means of promoting your own web site. Existing external links are useful, major contributors to the EVE community such that most appear on the front of the [official EVE site]. DJMalone 14:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I have modified the section on the new Blood patch, so that it matches the stile of the paragraphs above and below it, I have also left a message on the authors talk page asking him/her to provide a verifiable source for his/her assertion that the changes are in anticipation of the creation of a Chinease server; I agree however I can't find a link. -- Richard Slater 19:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Blood

message: A while back I split off the Ships section to Eve Online/Ships, since moved to Spaceships of EVE Online. It proved to be a very successful move that kept the page size down to reasonable levels without compromising depth. The Major Content Patches and Weapons headings are now starting to turn into elongated lists of their own: does anyone have an opinion on splitting them off too? --Tom Edwards 21:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with this, perhaps split them off into Weapons of EVE Online and Patches and Expansions of EVE Online Richard Slater 22:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree. Those sections should be split off into separate entries. DJMalone 13:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off Major Content Patches and Weapons?
Talk:Ruth Fernández

message: How did Ruth unite Latin America, and who are the other two? Demf 18:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ruth Fernandez reportedly turned 90 a few weeks ago (May 2007). She was given a small birthday party attended by many friends, including Chucho Avellanet, Shorty Castro, and William Miranda Marín, among others. Her mind is fading, but she still remembers quite a bit from her early days. However, the article states she was born in 1919. Is the date correct? Demf 21:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DOB?
Talk:Darkfall Online

message: User:Ratiopharma deleted the section entitled Vaporware. That section was added to address the concerns of the community from a NPOV about whether or not the game would be released to market. If you have valid reasons for not wanting that section in this article, please post them before deleting that section again. Skinrider 18:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be retained as there have been concerns about vaporware with Darkfall for years now.  I've added speculation to the header though as without a qualifier the header looks like it's describing darkfall as vaporware. MLA 19:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The vaporware section seems to be original research. It really needs to be backed up with some verifiable sources Mako 01:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding speculation to the header is a good idea. I added some references to the vaporware section in which Aventurine acknowledges having passed up publicity opportunities, and added links to some cancelled MMORPGs. Skinrider 20:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vaporware section

message: The History section contains the following line:
As of July 11, 2006, preparations are still being made to begin beta
This date comes directly from the quoted reference. There is no need to update this date on a daily basis, unless new information arises on preparations for beta. Skinrider 14:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Preparations for beta

message: The game is called Darkfall.  Darkfall Online is the URL the developers use to for the main Darkfall website.  They themselves do not refer to the game as Darkfall Online. Sure, you can cite third parties talking about "Darkfall Online" and include the misnomer here as a sourced alternative label because it is a fact that a few people happen to mistakenly use it.  However, to actually name the article itself Darkfall Online and to refer to the game throughout it as such is taking it too far.  ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ► 21:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite correct. A brief look at their site will show that the term "Darkfall Online" only exists as part of their URL, and not in any of the site's actual content. Many third parties (eg mmorpg.com) also don't tag "online" to the name (unlike games such as Warhammer Online, where the name does include the term "online") --Mako 23:51, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darkfall vs Darkfall Online
Talk:Mr. Boogedy

message: This movie was one of three or four movies that my elementary school played in the after-school program, so I've seen it probably about a dozen times. It's part of who I am. Chachilongbow 18:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it just me, or is the plot description a little more complete than most people would find reasonable? Chachilongbow 04:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail

message: Is there a proper Wikipedia phrase for overly fanboyish writing?  The word "even" in the initial description is a laughably dead giveaway.  It "even" stars John Astin?  Well, lucky us, I guess!
Christopher M (talk) 11:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ummm
Talk:Welcome to Pooh Corner

message: Would the Book of Pooh count as a modern version of Pooh Corner?
:Please sign your name using four tildes. As to your question, I believe so. 76.126.29.36 (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book of Pooh

message: Welcome to Pooh Corner will be aired on 'PBS Kids in June 2008 and ABC Kids in Fall 2008 and Boomerang in May 29, 2008 at 2:30pm every weekday.
Can anyone provide a source for this? 76.126.29.36 (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Future airings

message: Formal request has been received to merge the articles I Hum to Myself, The Right Side, You're the Only You and Try a Little Something New into Welcome to Pooh Corner. Proposer's rationale: These songs were only used in that one series and there is no evidence of them meeting WP:NSONG or WP:GNG beyond that. Discuss here. Richard3120 (talk) 18:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The lede states that Ralph Wright (Eeyore) reprised his role for this program, but his name is not listed in the voice credits later on in the article.  Powers T 11:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ralph Wright
Talk:Kent C. Nelson

message: There is no need for the nickname to appear in the article title.  He should be at Kent C. Nelson with redirect if necessary from Oz Nelson.  Eluchil404 19:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not listed this at WP:RM since it is unobstructed and I expect, uncontroversial.  If no one objects in the next 5-7 days, I will simply make the move myself. Eluchil404 19:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flushing–Main Street station (LIRR)

message: The LIRR map contains a dash in the station name, while other publication from the MTA say otherwise. And another website shows it dashless, albeit of dubious cerdibility. Some also pull up "Flushing" alone as a name. Pacific Coast Highway {X's • and O's!} 00:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The site "of dubious credibility" is actually a photo of a sign that clearly has no dash. --NE2 00:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That wasn't the site I was talking about. And we already had this discussion over signage versus publications (albeit over subway station names) before the project merger. Check the archives. Pacific Coast Highway {X's • and O's!} 00:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Another sign:  I agree that signs should not be the only consideration, but here they seem to "break the tie". --NE2 22:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dash or no dash? 