Talk:Blood for Dracula

message: How do we know the youngest daughter is 14? Maybe I missed that part or it was edited out of the version I saw?? It seems like something that would stick with the viewer. --12.213.80.54 (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 14yo

message: "Mario dismembers Dracula with an axe and kills him and the eldest of the Di Fiore's with a stake"
No, the eldest daughter is a vampiric suicide, albeit on the same stake that vanquishes Dracula. WHPratt (talk) 03:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: According to the book source, it was released on November 27, 1974. Do not change without a source or even discussion. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As seen here, here, and here, it came out on the sixth. --tronvillain (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Excellent. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: US release date

message: Country of production is irrelevant. The guideline says initial sentence or paragraph, it's the title on the poster in this article, the title at the premier, the title at its U.S. premier, and the first major English language release. Parenthetical alternate names are common practice on Wikipedia, and this is the clearly the major alternate name. --tronvillain (talk) 02:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A German title, for a film that's not even German is confusing. And in fact, it was not even released initially as Andy Warhol's Dracula, but Young Dracula, to be like Young Frankenstein. As there are so many alternative titles, cherry picking one would be confusing and misleading as there are other titles that carry important information. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "A German title"... in the English language, identical to the title for the North American release. And no, it wasn't initially released as Young Dracula: from 3 November 1974 alone, there's the LA Times "After Andy Warhol's 'Frankenstein'... Andy Warhol's Dracula", and The Philadelphia Inquirer "Andy Warhol's Dracula." In fact, I can't find any contemporary evidence that anything called "Young Dracula" was released in 1974 at all, and the "Young Dracula" released in 1975 appears to have been a retitled Son of Dracula as seen here, "Apple Films presents Ringo Starr in Young Dracula (the blood sucker with a beat"; here, "YOUNG DRACULA, Ringo Starr is long in the tooth in this spoof"; here "Big Horror Show - Ringo Starr in 'Young Dracula'"; here, and "Apple Films presents the first rock-and-roll Dracula Movie! Young Dracula (Son of Dracula)." Ads featuring an R-rated Young Dracula or Andy Warhol's Young Dracula don't seem to appear until late 1976, as seen here and here. This is the significant alternate English language title. --tronvillain (talk) 14:41, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

text: It's explained further here (source). Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, the Andy Warhol related title is explained in the prose in the lead already. I believe its better to explain Warhol's involvement then state the title to show that despite his name being in the title, he does not have much to do with this film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've read that, but you'll notice it doesn't say that Young Dracula was the release title, it says Peraino re-released it as that. Clearly Warhol was barely involved in the production, but that doesn't change the fact that it was the major English language title for decades. It's not like I'm arguing that the article be re-titled, just that it be the parenthetical alternate title - why that is can be explained in the prose later. --tronvillain (talk) 15:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If it says it was released under the title Young Dracula, I can't imagine what else it could mean. I still prefer explaining Warhols' relation first. Placing things in brackets in the lead is ok, but if we can fit into prose, thats basically a dozen times better in my books. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: I've left the editor credit empty in the infobox. It's not clear who edited the film as the Italian prints give a different name than others. If further information is found on who did it, please add it to the article. In the meantime, I think it should not be added to the infobox without an explanation in the prose. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Editor in the infobox