Template talk:One Piece

message: Ahem... Yes, I know their aweful... Lol.  But that can be changed after Its been completed right?  Angel Emfrbl 12:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know mine look awful, but I'm trying to edit, because I find very difficult to use all the tags. I'm just trying to have something like Naruto, but OP has so more characters and things... Anyway No problem. Cuttyflam 12:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Finally, i made all the changes that I wanted to do: I set the width at 80%, to avoid the template being to height. It seems that ahs got any thng from OP, but I think it will be better if we can improve together. Cuttyflam 13:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ask yourself... Is your verison better?  No. Prettier... But not better... I do not like the idea of scrolling to see half the links. I don't want a edit war here, can't you just adjust this but keep it the way it was?  Unless the verison is better it should stay the same... And your verison just looks sloppy.  Angel Emfrbl 13:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Cutty Flam is sorting that out... Would orange be better then yellow though?  The brightness of the yellow... Burns your eyeballs out.  Lol. Also the blue text I think needs to be darker to make it more visable against the blue background. It looks better then the dull grey and black it had before. Angel Emfrbl 09:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, the yellow is too shiny. We can try orange for the bar, but for the text  I think dark blue it's better. Cuttyflam 09:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... Have you the code for a paler orange?  That one isn't much better then the yellow. We also loose the word for making it reappear after being hidden because the text for it is the same colour.  :O  Angel Emfrbl 10:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: A useful list of color:
*Orange: #FFA000
*Yellow: #FFFF00
*Dark Blue: #0000C8
*Sky Blue (Cornflower Blue): #6495ED
[General]
Cuttyflam 10:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wait a sec... Lets try all the backgrounds blue.  Angel Emfrbl 10:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  On second thought... Ignore me thats too boring.  O.o' Angel Emfrbl 10:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text:  No problem :). I think it's better to leave so, now, waiting for other people opinions. Anyway, now it lokks good and clear to me. Cuttyflam 10:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About the colours

message: I have a suggestion for the factions section... Why not have it:
* Pirate crews
* World Govenemnt (including Ciphor Police, Marines, Shichibukai etc.)
* Other Important factions
Or is this suggesting too much??? Angel Emfrbl 09:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Factions section

message: Well I set up the basics of this page today so added it back in (can't say I'm proud of my effort... Because I didn't know how to approach it).  Hmm... Everyone agree with it on whether its okay to replace that?  It was removed previously.  Angel Emfrbl 10:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Console games added back in 

message: Most of the early translations are putting it down as '4 Emperors', so for now its what I can only write it as.  Angel Emfrbl 10:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporay Name

message: Is it really neccesary to have Garp's and Dragon's full name in the template? it's just spoilers. We could write just "Garp" and "Dragon". right? Kurigiri 22:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think they even deserved their own pages yet.  Take a look, there isn't enough info to supply those pages.  They SHOULDN'T have been created with that amount of info.  Angel Emfrbl 22:27, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needless spoilers 

message: I wanted to bring up the idea of designs of new templates for the One Piece articles. The  Templates look like this: Story Arcs, Related Articles, Factions , Characters. Each Navi Template has a link to the other Templates, and as you can see, are smaller and neater but still allow easy movement through the articles.
Also the change to the General will look like this;
As you can see "general" has been split into five separate templates, each to be placed on the pages featured in the template. RecklessFire 21:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If worst comes to worst RecklessFire, give it a trial run this Sunday and see how it goes for the next week. Say Sunday - Sunday.  Nothing stopping you doing that at least.  If it works, we can keep.  If not we revert and you can have a second attempt at something else (if that is your wish).  Though I still don't like the idea of seperate little templates, I don't have cribs with anyone doing.  So how does that idea sound?  At the end of the week, everyone voices an opinion as to how it went (if we get anyone I add -_-' ).  Angel Emfrbl 23:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW you were missing one |} on that table here.  I've put it in. Angel Emfrbl 23:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works. RecklessFire 15:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I only don't like the color pink there. The current colors seem better. - Tekoteko 08:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering its a Shonen manga, not the girlie manga types... Tekoteko has a point! XD Angel Emfrbl 10:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes well, that can be changed. I'm going ahead with the trial run. RecklessFire 18:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My only problem is that breaking the template up would mean that in order to get to a different section whoever wants too would have to click on another link to get to the link they want to. And I'll correct the character template's mistakes... (Justyn 05:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We can run a vote on the new template system next week to see how everyone was with it.  My main crib right now is the left hand side of each template is a confusing mess... Its not OBIVOUS the words "characters" and other led to the other templates.  Angel Emfrbl 07:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Navi Templates 

message: Sunday I reverted the templates back to the orginal.  Reason being is the same as the discussions we had a long time ago... Everyone prefers one single template (according to the discussion on the Main One Piece Talk Page).  
For now though, the characters template has also been removed as per discussion on how to improve things.  The characters now are only accessable on the main template via their factions pages.  Then you can acess other characters by the Character Template.  The trouble if we put the character back onto this template is that its likely to led to the same old "template too big" problem.  In short we are going to have to accept things as they are until we can think up something better.  Its sutiable have their links accessed via the factions pages, this is generally a standard and acceptable layout on other anime (or otherwise) wikipedia pages so we shouldn't have any problems with it here.  
Other changes include the removal of the sagas section.  This was because they are gone now (deleted + merged into one article).  Otherall, the template is now smaller and essentially a lot more suitable to wikipedia.  The character template needs tweaking, we'll have a discussion on that later. 
Any further suggestions anyone has, feel free to bring them up.  We can't touch the English adpations bit for now due to a cirrent discussion. Otherwise, this is the state of the template as of my signing this comment.  Angel Emfrbl 09:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explaination on Changes

message: The template does not appear to be displaying season 11 on my machine, despite clearing cache and giving the template a decent amount of time to update.じんない 04:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because I haven't added season 11 yet. :) -- Goodraise (talk) 04:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There you are. -- Goodraise (talk) 04:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The place to suggest that would be Talk:List of One Piece episodes (season 10). Regards,  22:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  season 11