lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sock (disambiguation)

message: Should this not go to the page on Socks, the item on clothing, that is probably what people mean to go to if they look up socks? Captain Octopus (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The "What links here" for "socks" is certainly full of references to the sock article, so your point is valid. I'll make the move. +mt 14:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the dismbig page for socks has been merged with sock
Helpfulweasal (talk) 02:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 04:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Socks (disambiguation) →  – Per WP:SINGULAR, article titles should generally be rendered in the singular. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Since a lot of these plural meanings only work as plural, and are not actually ambiguous with singular ones (beyond the implications of the dictionary meaning), I would rather we split these two disambiguations up (WP:SMALLDETAILS). --Joy (talk) 08:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Indeed, page history says it was split up until these edits that didn't really provide a rationale:   . --Joy (talk) 08:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Most DAB pages include singular and plural together. There isn't a need for 2 DAB pages here. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 January 2023 

message: An editor has requested that :Socks (cat) be moved to another page, which is related to the disambiguated terms covered by this page. You  are invited to participate in the move discussion.
-- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Socks (cat) naming ambiguity

message: The redirect Socking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 13:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Socking]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Card

message: Where are they?117.213.3.165 (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I went and added it. Chris857 (talk) 15:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tarot cards

message: Seems there is overlap between CARD (disambiguation) and Card. I'd be fine with either merging all CARD (all caps) usage here or with splitting CARD usage out from the card page. older ≠ wiser 12:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge here. This page isn't so long it requires splitting. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

text: Merge - yeah, I've wondered about this for a while, but never really had the motivation. Chris857 (talk) 17:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:St. John's Regional Medical Center

message: Please do note that three of these are within an hour's drive of each other.
*  buenaventura_%28Ventura%29%2c_California 
*  San_Buenaventura 
*  san_Buenaventura_County%2c_California 
*  buenaventura_County%2c_California 
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 18:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ Buenaventura ]][[ Los Angeles County ]]
Talk:Second Situationist International

message: I suggest that the very brief Situlogy and Drakabygget Declaration articles be merged into this article.  This article is not in such great shape, but there certainly in no reason for the existence of these other puny articles when they could easily be merged here.  It is better that all this material be dealt with in one place, especially considering how short this article is currently.  Any thoughts? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 18:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am situlogist skomorokh and I approve of this message. скоморохъ 19:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Very clever. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 19:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Lysekil Municipality

message: Student of University of Bergamo - Heritage studies and ICT
Hello, My name is Frida Andersson and i am a master student at the University of Bergamo. I have edited this article, since i am a part of a project with around 100 students contributing to improve Wikipedia articles related to cities, territories and heritage (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage_studies_and_ICT).
In this article i have updated information about the distribution of seats in the municipal council to the latest election in 2018, deleted information about sister cities after contacting the director of administrative management of the municipality to check if it the information found on the page was correct or not and added information about herring fishing and listed buildings in the municipality. 
If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me.
F.andersson98 (talk) 14:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions
Template talk:East Yorkshire

message: The name of the county is the East Riding of Yorkshire and not East Yorkshire so I think that the template needs renaming to the correct name. Keith D (talk) 19:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Suggest renaming this category as 'Waterways' as only the Derwent, Hull and Ouse are rivers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.39.137 (talk) 03:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The sections are named the same for all county templates not just this one, I have been asking about the introduction of canals to the section though the only response so far has been to add a new section. Keith D (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now added a canals section to the template. Keith D (talk) 11:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rivers
Talk:Party People (Nelly song)

message: Why is this marked for deletion instead of asking for more sources? The source is from allaccess.com.  I can try to pull the source link later but it is all over the internet. Just google search for it. Gsmumbo (talk) 18:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Marked for deletion?

message: ain't the genre Screwed and Chopped and Midwest rap aswell? cuz their voices get screwed and chopped in the song and they rap fast halfwaySCB '92 (talk) 15:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Chopped and screwed would apply if the entire record were in that style.  It's not.  Midwest rap?  The last I checked, "rapping fast" was not limited to just the Midwest.  --InDeBiz1 (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: I've uploaded the original artwork for the article. This was the first one to be used and should remain the same. The new cover art should be used in the alternative artwork box in the song infobox. El Cangri386 17:07, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art
Talk:Nora

message: I added two people with the surname Nora, and a bunch of other uses. I didn't update the given names section. I propose that the given name section be deleted because it's not useful for disambiguation purposes and it's difficult to maintain. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 17:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's no objection, I'll make the change in the next couple of days. Thanks, SchreiberBike (talk) 01:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Given names

message: There may be a point to removing the section if it is in reference to background, recurring, or one-off characters, but if Nora is the name of a main character, I believe that should warrant mention in such a section. For example, Nora Vaklyrie from the web-series RWBY is a main character. Also, Nora Baker of Cheaper by the Dozen and Nora Walker of Brothers and Sisters.
Mercen-X (talk) 11:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional characters

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Nora Court District and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Nora Court District until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nora Court District" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:North Haven

message: I trashed this content (& its dab-pg heading):
* Haven (disambiguation)
* New Haven (disambiguation)
* South Haven (disambiguation)
* East Haven (disambiguation)
* West Haven (disambiguation)
I don't see that as closing the matter, but as opening a needed discussion. Dabs should be as terse as feasible. That's most important near the top of the page, but even if the only difference is that the essentially worthless material makes the Dab longer, that length is distracting; when a user reaches the end of the Dab without finding what they sought, and there is no See also section, it's not the Dab's job to keep feeding them less and less relevant articles (or Dabs) that might explain why what they were seeking was not on the page. If they're wrong in recalling which directional adjective they read, or only were only guessing that "N. Haven" used "N." to abbreviate "North", their time looking at a list of all the mistakes a WP editor could think of would instead be better spent using their knowledge of why they thought "North Haven" would be a good place to look, to deduce what is the most efficient way to proceed. Why should they look at our list when a moment's reflection, or confirmation of what they read, will almost certainly be better focused?   I could be wrong (it happens over and over), but our colleague having worked on the page before me isn't enuf to show i'm wrong. If i'm wrong, tell us how and why before re-adding the kind of clutter i've removed.--Jerzy•t 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rem'val of See also 

message: I was more concerned, today, with reorganizing the non-controversial content than with the above mentioned inappropriate content, aimed apparently at users who can't at the moment recall whether they're looking for places called Some-direction Haven or No-particular-direction Haven -- i.e., users foolish enuf to use disambiguation pages for tasks where ambiguous naming is not the problems they're trying to solve. So it doesn't much matter whether
# i forgot to carry out the trash-iating edit that i promised last year, or
# someone reverted that edit by me, without more comment than, for instance, an edit summary mocking my appeal for discussion:
In either case no one cares much about the notion that a page intended to distinguish between different senses of "North Haven" is cluttered up with aids to who are likely to confuse North with other directions, or no direction at all.--Jerzy•t 01:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-empting my own neglected appeal
Talk:North British

message: A "perjorative" term is one that is deliberately offensive, often derogatory and dismissive. How is "North British" offensive, derogatory or dismissive?
Including that in the article summary without justification or citation can only be described as an arrogant assertion, and should have been avoided. 203.20.62.157 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perjorative Term
Template talk:Edinburgh Rugby squad

message: I just removed the speedy deletion template. Having a template for a specific season means the information won't be lost the following season, i.e. this template can be used on the players' article pages forever and doesn't need to be removed when the player leaves the club. However, it is duplicating Template:Edinburgh Rugby squad, so that template must be redirected to this one. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Are all squad navbox templates required from season to season? In my opinion, to keep only squad navbox template for the current season is better, and the champion squad template should be remain for one champion team by one season.  Sawol (talk) 01:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  How is it better to just have current information and not historical information too? Why not have historical squads, if available? TheMightyPeanut (talk) 06:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Historical squads have already been included in each season article like 2014–15 Edinburgh Rugby season. This is sufficient. Suppose that a man has played for 10 seasons. Then the article for him attaches at least 10 templates. It repeats itself uselessly. The same information is stated in , the text, and squad template.  Sawol (talk) 09:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  The same information isn't stated in  – that doesn't give you an indication of which team-mates he played with, etc. You stated above you'd like to keep for the "champion team". It someone plays for a successful team, then the same arguments above could apply. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 09:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  An example of the baseball season squad like Template:2013 Boston Red Sox is desirable. The champion club's squad isn't even make in football.  Sawol (talk) 09:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Having concise and pertinent information at hand to provide to the reader of the article is desirable. Why have templates for champions and not non-winning teams when it gives a better indication of a player's career? TheMightyPeanut (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  If that is unfair between champions and not non-winning teams, any seasonal navbox could not be allowed. Could we spread the discussion through Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union?  Sawol (talk) 12:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Chichibabin reaction

message: "The reaction takes place especially in 2 and 5 position of the Pyridine."
By resonance stability rules, I would expect 2 (==6) and 4 to be the pair with similar reactivity, and different than 3 (==5). Is something special going on here?
"As electrophilic addition is only possible in 3 and 5 position of the pyridine ring the 2 and 5 positions became available for further synthesis by the Chichibabin reaction" is confusing. First part contradicts previously quoted sentence (though matches that 3==5 is a consistent set in my comment). But more, what is this whole sentence actually saying? I can't deciper what does happen (normally), what happens when that does not happen, or what prevents the normal from happening. DMacks (talk) 18:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substitution pattern confusion
Talk:Michelle Grabner

message: Adequate citations? Ok to remove template at top now? Margitaw (talk) 20:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would be great to include details about Grabner's role in the Front International Triennial Youarealwaysfree (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front International Triennial
File talk:Rickshaw (Jinricki), 1860 - ca. 1900.jpg

message: Can someone verify this picture? I HIGHLY doubt it is from 1886, the color is remarkable. Especially after reading Color photography, the picture seems higly dubious. Smooth0707 (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi again. I responded on the article talk page. Pinkville (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Young Democrats of North Carolina

message: Do a news archive search on "Young Democrats of North Carolina" using Google and you come up with 52 significant secondary sources (including nearly all the major North Carolina newspapers and the New York Times).  This meets the criterion suggested as a rule of thumb for notability.
Therefore, I will remove the notability warning, and work to further improve the page.
Ncperspective (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Öregrund

message: Had the pleasure to visit Oregrund last week. Added one of the pictures to the article, but there are a couple more worth considering for when the article is more developed. Will leave them here in case someone wants to use them in the future:
Oregrund (93028)p.jpg|Fishing hut and sauna on the water
Oregrund (92935).jpg|Wooden boat in the marina
Oregrund (92909).jpg|Different view of the marina/town center
Vastra Banken lightship in Oregrund (92929).jpg|The lightship
— Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Ystad

message: Google: Ysted 574, Ystad 29,600! --Muniswede (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name used in Danish
Talk:Skara

message: As far as I know, the E20 road isn't a "motorway" in the vicinity of Skara.  I'm not sure of the correct road words in English, but a motorway it's not. Fomalhaut76 (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  E20 at Skara 
Talk:Adam Russell

message: While attempting to clear up "Adam Russell" vs Adam W. Russell, a move was made of the information on Adam W. Russell the baseball player... however, all of the original page history was moved over to "Adam W. Russell" as well. If needed, the previous page versions for Adam Russell can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_W._Russell&action=history as it seems there may not be a way to get the page history back here. --Umrguy42 (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been repaired. The history for the musician is here, and the history for the baseball player is at Adam Russell (baseball). Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 07:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page History
Talk:Oskarshamn

message: Has anyone details related to the powerplant and the major accident a few years back?--Nemissimo (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuclear Powerplant
Talk:Norrtälje

message: I've seen this place on the web as Norrtelge. See Geonames server for example and there are over 15,500 results on Google. I'm trying to track down if this is an English variant spelling. It's seems a well known variant. I am wondering about adding a redirect page to this page, and adding it to the lead. Is Norrtelge a good or poor transliteration to English? ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Norrtelge or more commonly Norrtelje are spellings used before the Swedish spelling reform of 1906. It is really not an "English spelling", but an arcaic one. It is perhaps used in many languages in order to avoid the letter "ä", which may be a bit unfamiliar. There are some such examples of old-fasioned spellings of Swedish place-names, i.e. Gefle (Gävle), Wexiö (Växjö), Christianstad (Kristianstad), Hvellinge (Vellinge). They are today un-official, but could be used in names of local newspapers or firms.--Muniswede (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norrtelge
Template talk:Toy Story

message: What about this game? --Eikern (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: Hi. I'm Kimberly Jordan and I'm going to discuss about the dinosaurs in the Toy Story series.
Rex the Tyrannosaurus and Trixie the Triceratops are cretaceous dinosaurs regardless of the show title Jurassic Park. Rex's first appearance is the first Toy Story film and towards the end, he predicts that he wants a leaf-eating dinosaur and it really just happened in film #3. It's revealed to be Trixie. Whenever she befriends him, she can help him win video games because her arms are bigger than his.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.222.128 (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaurs
Talk:No. 518 Squadron RAF

message: Was 1402 absorbed during the war (i.e. 1943) as stated in the first paragraph of History:"After moving to RAF Tiree on 25 September 1943, and absorbing 1402 Flight"or after the War as in the second paragraph:"After the end of the Second World War the squadron moved to RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland where it absorbed 1402 Flight"?Could the first event have been an attachment?  Would someone with access the references please check them.SBaker43 (talk) 15:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No. 1402 (Meteorological) Flight RAF
Talk:Yemenite citron

message: This article mentions several times the "purity" of Yemenite citrons. Can someone please elaborate (in the article) on what this means? Why would any fruit be more "pure" than another fruit? Is this referring to some kind of genetic purity? If so, what is it being compared to? Why would any citron fruit not be "pure" (barring hybridization)? Why is its "purity" so important? All of these things should be explained in the article. Kaldari (talk) 17:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purity?
Talk:Kinley, Saskatchewan

message: (Cocopie (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Minimal residual disease

message: I will help clean-up this page.  I am going to start with style and grammar edits.  I am also going to modify MRD detection of the BCR-ABL t(9;22) translocation in CML is standard of care in most developed countries and is not limited to clinical trials.  It extremely important for the monitoring of imatinib mesilate (Gleevec/Glivec)treatment and is in widespread use.  I look forward to working with everyone to make this page an excellent wikipedia entry.  BTW, I have been developing and performing molecular diagnostic tests for leukemia and lymphoma MRD for over 10 years.
Rcubbon (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: MRD is a general concept in cancer biology and therefore the article should not have such a strong focus on leukaemia 81.98.98.171 (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is too focussed on leukaemia
Talk:Kisbey

message: My great Grandfather was Herbert Kisbey. He was stage artist whose  appearances included  the London Palladium and Edward the VII's command performance for the poor. His personal life was a little complex with family connections in the English Midlands, London, South Africa and New Zealand. I note that the main road in Kisbey is called Herbert Road. This appears too much of a coincidence. Is there any knowledge of a connection ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:BEF0:B400:1D:90B4:C886:6F3A (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kisbey