lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heartwork

message: That cover could do with a little update, it's a bit unclear and all. Darksteel 14:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Update 

message: dude, this band and album are strongly influenced by grindcore, this album definutely deserves a grindcore label
if anything carcass is closer to grindcore than death metal
: This particular album by them (as well as Swansong which followed it) is not grindcore in the slightest.  It's usually considered melodic death metal (though, to my ears, it does resemble somewhat Coma of Souls-era Kreator).  I wouldn't even call the previous album, Necroticism, a grindcore album, it's thrash-influenced death metal.  Only Reek of Putrefaction and Symphonies of Sickness are grindcore, and even then, Symphonies of Sickness is just as much death metal as it is grind.--Vlad the Impaler (talk) 07:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Wake Up and Smell the... Carcass

message: I'm not 100% sure on what colour the album box should be, but I know that it shouldn't be orange as Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums recommends its use for Original Studio albums. I'm not sure if this counts as a box set, but I'm changing to darkseagreen
Yeah, it needs to be darkseagreen. Darksteel 16:36, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album colour? 

message: :Image:Carcass-WakeUpAndSmellThe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Carcass-WakeUpAndSmellThe.jpg
Talk:The Cars (album)

message: I generally dislike splitting up the flow of the track listing with full-sized individual song notes, preferring to leave them to the end. There are very few album articles that have them, so I'm open-minded. I also prefer "vocal" to "vocals" in this context.
I have a few alternative ideas: 
(1) No italics
#"Good Times Roll" – 3:44
#* Lead vocal - Ric Ocasek
#"My Best Friend's Girl" – 3:44
#* Lead vocal - Ric Ocasek
#"Just What I Needed" – 3:44
#* Lead vocal - Benjamin Orr
...
(2) Small Italics
#"Good Times Roll" – 3:44
#* Lead vocal - Ric Ocasek
#"My Best Friend's Girl" – 3:44
#* Lead vocal - Ric Ocasek
#"Just What I Needed" – 3:44
#* Lead vocal - Benjamin Orr
...
(3) Small italics in-line with the track
#"Good Times Roll" – 3:44 Lead vocal - Ric Ocasek
#"My Best Friend's Girl" – 3:44 Lead vocal - Ric Ocasek
#"Just What I Needed" – 3:44 Lead vocal - Benjamin Orr
...
(4) Song notes at the end, kept brief.
=== Track listing ===
# "Good Times Roll" – 3:44
# "My Best Friend's Girl" – 3:44
# "Just What I Needed" – 3:44
...
=== Song notes ===
* Lead vocals all by Benjamin Orr, except Ric Ocasek on "Good Times Roll," "I'm in Touch With Your World," "Don't Cha Stop," "You're All I've Got Tonight."
* The running time for "Moving in Stereo" mislabled on the CD jewel case as 5:15.
My preference would be for 3 or 4. Fantailfan 12:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding lead vocal credits 

message: * Lead vocals all by Benjamin Orr, except Ric Ocasek on "Good Times Roll," "I'm in Touch With Your World," "Don't Cha Stop," "You're All I've Got Tonight."
* The running time for "Moving in Stereo" mislabled on the CD jewel case as 5:15.
My preference would be for 3 or 4. Fantailfan 12:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song notes 

message: Please do not change the article again without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit. --Fantailfan 14:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding lead vocals credits (again) 

message: You have again changed the article without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit again. --Fantailfan 14:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding lead vocals credits (third time) 

message: You have again changed the article without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit again and requesting semi-protection. --Fantailfan 20:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section again 

message: What is an "AOR radio favorite"? 142.36.45.56 (talk) 16:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Into the Pandemonium

message: * “We hated these unwritten limitations in the metal scene,” he continues. .
* . 23:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpful links 

message: Another facet of Celtic Frost's radical marriage between high and low culture showed up on the lyrical department.
The album also marked the end of their tenure with Noise Records. A costly legal battle with the label unsued, due to accusations by the band that Noise sabotaged the album's promotion. "Pulling the plug" on tour support, video support and other marketing costs.
One particularly controvertial portion of the album was the dance-oriented "One In their Pride", whose samples and drum machines reminded Belgian EBM group Front 242. Former Anthrax and Nuclear Assault bassist Dan Lilker confessed his enstrangement with track, and that it was a general feeling at the time. Although he concedes that "some of the stuff that Frost had been doing on To Mega Therion with female vocals and orchestration got people ready for some of the avant-garde stuff.Christie 2004, page 21.
189.82.170.187 (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary texts
Talk:Cheap Trick at Budokan

message: Please can someone supply a definitive date for when the Japanese TV Concert was filmed, as all the info I have found is contradictory:
The Wikipedia article says both the 28 and 30 April 1978.
The allmusic review says Friday 30 April 1978, but that can't be because that day was a Sunday.
Amazon.com says Friday 28 April 1978.
Thanks Memphisto (talk) 12:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese TV Concert

message: I read here,  "As stated by producer Jack Douglas, the audio from Live at Budokan is actually not from the Budokan, but from Osaka, which was a smaller show".  Doesn't this fundamentally contradict the second sentence in the first paragraph of this article:  "Recorded at the Nippon Budokan in Tokyo, the album was first released ..."? Jack Douglas' comment is unreferenced, so it should be removed.  Or maybe it is a valid comment from an authoritative source and we should change the first paragraph? Mconant (talk) 06:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  live at Budokan... or not?
Talk:Euphoria Morning

message: Can we change the main title to Euphoria Mourning in line with the artist's wishes and the re-released title? I tried to move it but because the redirect is in place it won't allow me. - Stanlavisbad (talk) 07:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title

message: The "Video clips" section lacks any video clips. Should the whole section probably be deleted, until someone adds them?
-Jack Vermicelli 98.209.134.64 (talk) 18:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Clips
Talk:Head over Heels (Cocteau Twins album)

message: I've reverted recent changes that had described the band and record as dream pop. According to this source used in the Dream pop article, Cocteau Twins influenced dream pop but are not described as being part of it. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 11:35, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That's OK. There was no dreampop in the early/mid-'80s. Head over Heels is clearly a post-punk/goth album, dark, noisy and otherworldly, related to the music of Siouxsie & The Banshees, X-mal Deutschland and others. It really has not much to do with the later dreampop movement. Maybe MBV drew on some guitar riffs, but MBV was generally "goth-drenched" in their early years. It doesn't really matter...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.134.4.16 (talk) 18:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:A Rush of Blood to the Head

message: added a bunch of cites to the infobox to support listed genres. "Rock" was added as the first genre, supported by the Russian webpage https://daily.afisha.ru/music/13341-reyting-albomov-coldplay-ot-hudshego-k-luchshemu/. Using Google Translate, I looked at the text and saw no support for the album being classified as any particular genre. The blurb said that the album shows Coldplay as a "successful stadium band" but the Chris Martin avoids the temptation of playing "a passionate rockstar seducer."  Nothing about album genre.
Otherwise, I don't think we should be expanding the infobox before the article body, per WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Genres should first be expanded using prose in the article body, then a summary of the genres should be displayed in the infobox. Binksternet (talk) 00:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock genre from Russia?
Talk:Fuse (Colin James album)

message: I have classified this album as a stub due to the limited amount of text in the article. Capitalistroadster 00:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:Three Imaginary Boys

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 21:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: I propose that Boys Don't Cry (The Cure album) be merged into this, as it is almost the same album and can easily be incorporated into this article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 04:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - I don't see any advantage of merging, the articles work separately or merged. They probably are better separate as they have their own reviews and track listing. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the argument against and no support. Klbrain (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: It really bothers me that websites like Pitchfork and Allmusic have their reviews linked, and cited, so prominently on the Wikipedia entry for almost every important rock album. They are (somewhat subtly) high-jacking Wikipedia for their own promotion. What would be much more valuable would be contemporary reviews of these albums, written at the time of their release. Alas, who has the time to do that? Instead, we often get the Allmusic and/or Pitchfork appraisal from the 21st century, often written by people too young to understand how the album was received in its time. This is a weakness of the crowd-source model, and can be rectified only by people taking the time to find and link contemporary reviews in these articles. Sometimes, the most important contemporary review is not even available online, but could be scanned and posted. Please help.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.35.240.182 (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A reference doesn't have to be online to be used. See Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Examples. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia being used to promote specific websites
Talk:Super Fly (soundtrack)

message: The film is at Super Fly (film). I noticed the spelling here was different, and moved it accordingly, but I suspect they should be the same. I would have written it as one word, despite the layout on the promo. Anyway, I think we should be consistent. - Jmabel | Talk 17:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of title 

message: Good job Dan56 for cleaning up this article. I've always wanted to tackle it but..I got lazy. :) 
I removed the 2004 rolling stone review for this article. Only because it was a bit mis-leading. We'd need a page number for that cite to make it anything useful and it made it not clear which review (the original one, or the 2004 one) actually gave the five star rating. To make it more clear later, perhaps in the reception section something about that 5 star review should be added to that section. What does anyone else think? Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for incorporating the album review into the article, but that was only half the point. With that extra review, that makes 11 reviews in the infobox. That's a bit too many. Also, with that five stars it wasn't clear which review (the 2000's one or the 1970s one) is the 5 star review. The average reader of the article wouldn't know which is which. To make it clear, I've removed the 2004 link from the infobox. I hope there aren't any objections here! Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 rolling stone review
Talk:Penis Envy (album)

message: Restored controversial album cat, see following text which explains why album was controversial;
"One track, not actually listed on the album cover, was a deliberately sacharine (described in fact by the band themselves as pure, unadulterated shit) parody of a "MOR" love song entitled "Our Wedding" [1]. This was given away as a flexi disc with a teenage girl's romance magazine called Loving after having been offered it by an organisation calling itself Creative Recording And Sound Services (note the initials). A minor tabloid furore erupted once the hoax was revealed, with the News of the World going so far as to state that the album's title was "too obscene to print" (a leaflet giving the background to this situationist-style prank was subsequently issued by the band[2])."
:Sorry, my mistake, missed that bit.  hellboy 00:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, the album was also seized by manchester Police during the mid 80s (84 I think) as 'obscene', in the event one song from the album, 'bata Motel' was found to have 'obscene' content, i'll add this to the article in time, but need to verify some facts and dates first... quercus robur 17:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial category

message: Allmusic.com gave this 4.5/5, why lie? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.75.9.216 (talk) 12:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMG rating 

message: :Image:Penisenvy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 19:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Penisenvy.jpg
Talk:Weathered

message: Creed is a Hard Rock band and their songs are either Hard Rock or Post Grunge. But in Weathered album wiki page, the genre mentioned is only Post Grunge which is a false information. As a musician and understandings about Music Genres I need to edit the changes from "Post Grunge" tohttps://www.google.co.nz/search?ei=MA06W-uiN9OkmAXqt56ACg&q=creed+genre&oq=creed+genre&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i7i30k1l4j0i5i10i30k1j0i7i5i10i30k1j0i7i5i30k1j0i7i5i10i30k1l2j0i7i5i30k1.2581.4518.0.4874.7.7.0.0.0.0.223.858.2-4.4.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..3.4.854...0i8i30k1j0i8i10i30k1j0i13k1j0i8i7i30k1j0i8i7i10i30k1j0i8i13i10i30k1j0i8i13i30k1.0.keSIdPiPDjo "Post Grunge, Hard Rockhttps://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/christianity/christianity-general/creed"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judson Christudas (talk • contribs) 11:42, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, as we have sources here (https://www.discogs.com/Creed-Weathered/master/106070), here (https://music.avclub.com/creed-weathered-1798192917) and here (https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/creed/weathered/) that state this. Theevinco (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Creed Genre is Hard Rock & Post Grunge

message: that information is wrong 
it sold 6 million copies which is a lot 
but it was not #1 on the album decade charts  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:19A:59C0:DDEC:7766:DEB2:E765 (talk) 12:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT # 1 sold album of the decade
Talk:The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars

message: I know this might have been discussed earlier, but what was the actual release date for this album? I'm finding multiple sources, including Cann, Spitz, Discogs, and AllMusic say it's 6 June while davidbowie.com says 16 June. I'm super confused as to which one it actually was. – zmbro (talk) 15:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: To add on to this, O'Leary and Pegg say it's June 6 as well. – zmbro (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: Adding !scope="row" to the weekly and year-end chart tables would follow :MOS:DTAB and provide a darker shade to match the sales certifications table. Also, using both the subsection headings and table captions essentially gives two lines of headings, which looks repetitive/busy (since no other albums are mentioned, adding Ziggy Stardust to each really isn't needed either). Small point, but I've seen "Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)"s for Featured list candidates. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charts and certifications
Talk:3 Feet High and Rising

message: Should there not be some mention of the fact that this album is not currently available for purchase, due to copyright issues? 
[I think this is the case - it's certainly not available on vinyl in the UK, and is reaching very high second-hand prices on eBay).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quarkmonkey (talk • contribs) 11:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Availability/Copyright issues 

message: The currently listed release date of March 3, 1989 is a little too late - it was released mid-February. I checked Billboard magazine for that month. In the Feb. 4 issue, Nelson George wrote that the album was about to be released. After it was released, Bill Coleman gave it a rave review in the February 18 issue. It also got a good review in the standard Album Reviews section in the Feb. 25 issue. Would have been nice if one of them had given an exact date. In my own collection I just catalog it as Feb 11 (halfway between those 2 issues), but for Wikipedia I can only accurately say February. PatConolly (talk) 23:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: Is it worth linking "The Magic Number" somewhere to Schoolhouse_Rock!#Multiplication_Rock?  Bob Dorough is named as a writer.  Maybe link to the original song as a sample, at least? Canute (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schoolhouse Rock?
Talk:Frankenchrist

message: There was a lawsuit involving Jello Biafra and/or and/or the Dead Kennedys and/or Newsweek versus The Shriners and/or a particular shriner over that classic cover photo. Unfortunately I can't find good enough sources to be more specific, although have a feeling I read about this in a book I borrowed from the central library in Cardiff (cardiff.gov.uk probably) about classic album covers. Ireneshusband 06:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shriner lawsuit 

message: is the lyric 
"you no longer exist" a reference to brazil, the movie...
wait what came out first  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.142.120 (talk) 10:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference to brazil? 

message: I have a British pressing of Frankenchrist LP, and on my record song Jock-o-Rama is called Macho-Rama. Also, in all lyrics, words Jock-o- are replaced with Macho-. Any idea on this ?Mairosu (talk) 01:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jock-o-Rama
Talk:Let's Get Free

message: Would you reckon that this album has Dub elements? The track Hip-Hop has a notable undulating baseline, a feature mainly of dub songs. Colt .55 (talk) 16:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dub or even DnB? 
Talk:Stormbringer (album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 19:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: In Michael Moorcock's fantasy books, Stormbringer is an evil magical sword that steals the souls of people it kills.
Does anyone know if Moorcock's sword influenced the lyrics of Deep Purple's song "Stormbringer"?  Some of the lyrics might fit this a bit, but that's speculation.  I wonder if the lyricist (Coverdale??) might have commented on this.  Moorcock's books are the sort of thing that I could see Blackmore reading, and DP Mk III did have some other dark fantasy - based lyrics ("Burn", "Sail Away", etc.) — Lawrence King (talk) 03:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered my own question. — Lawrence King (talk) 07:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to Michael Moorcock's Stormbringer? 

message: No mention of US and UK versions of the cover. "The reissue is going for the blue tint of the American sleeve, as this is how it was meant to look." -   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wavydavy68 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different versions of the cover 

message: Isn't Quadraphonic a 4.0 mix?  So which is it on the DVD, 4.0 or 4.1?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.96.38.41 (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 4.1 Mix