lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Constructed languages

message: The template says Mänti is one of the most notable conlangs. If that is so, why does it not have its own article, or even a well-written section in Daniel Tammet? Is it really that notable? 151.203.254.81 (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it until evidence of notability, and a good reference, are provided. Sai Emrys ¿?✍ 04:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mänti 

message: Is Mirad notable (let alone "most notable")?  The article is very thin and implies it is a work in progress. —Tamfang (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The language itself is not that new, because it goes back to 1965, which makes it pretty improbable that it's still a work in progress. I do believe it has a certain degree of notability - just enough to warrant the existence of a WP article - but no more than dozens of similar projects. It definitely does not belong to the "most notable", although I admit the current selection is debatable as well. Besides, the article is little more than a stub, and the articles linked to from this template should have some substance at least. I'll remove it. —IJzeren Jan  Uszkiełtu? 19:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirad 

message: There are a lot of completely unnotable languages on this infobox that have never been talked about outside of conlang mailing lists. Many of them were probably added to the infobox by their authors, while others are obscure curiosities that don't really belong in Wikipedia. There should not be this many articles about individual constructed languages: imo there should be Latin Without Inflections, Volapuk, Esperanto, Ido, Quenya/Sindarin, Interlingua, Klingon, Loglan, lojban, Dothraki and Na'vi. Throw *truly* up-and-coming languages like Láadan and Toki Pona in there too if you want. Why not start a conlang wiki that lists any and every conlang in existence? Kraŭs (talk) 20:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's been done. —Tamfang (talk) 05:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  frathwiki.com —Tamfang (talk) 06:06, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language creep 

message: Today I've removed two sections from the template: grammars of individual languages and language comparisons. This template is not meant to provide links to all conlang-related articles, it is not even meant to include every individual conlang. The links in question are in fact expanded subsections and can be find in the articles they belong to. Other templates for language groups don't include this kind of articles either. —IJzeren Jan  Uszkiełtu? 11:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed two sections 

message: Fushi conlang is created in 2 of july of 2024, 40 consonantes and 8 vowels 2800:A4:1546:5200:C48:62F9:A83:8612 (talk) 01:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fushi
Talk:Case management (US healthcare system)

message: Case Management is a concept which exists in Law and a number of other professions/disciplines. I would suggest expanding the article to include Healthcare but as it stands the definition is too narrow.
217.206.192.162 (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Earlypsychosis (talk) 11:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  significant use of term in mental health 

message: this article on case management needs some expert attention please.  I have recently started a Case management (disambiguation) page as the there are other case management terms, including a more general term medical case management Thanks for help Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  need some help with the [[Case management (USA health system)]] 
Talk:MV Columbus

message: never done this before...
hope this is the right place and right way to do it,
but here goes.
--------------------------------
Just checked out the info on OCEAN VILLAGE cruise ship
to find the two photos are a bit dull.
Ocean Village was here in Barbados yesterday, 
and I captured some decent pics of her, while she was docked, 
in full sunlight!
If you like to use any of my pics, please feel free to do so
I have copies mounted on the www at
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard2/cncisland/bigships/ov.html
and more specifically at
http://www.angelfire.com/wizard2/cncisland/bigships/OV1.html
where either of the top two pics should do nicely?
also uploaded one(slightly larger) to
http://photos.cruisecritic.com/showgallery.php?cat=509
72.22.137.220 (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Time After Time

message: Is the Quietdrive version of this song a cover of the Cyndi Lauper version? I think the lyrics might match up, but I'm not sure. The two shouldn't be listed separately if they are, at least not without something linking them to indicate that one is a cover.
:It is a cover version, so I've removed it. There are many cover versions of the song listed on Time After Time (Cyndi Lauper song), they all don't need to be on the disambiguation page. dissolvetalk 21:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyndi vs. Quietdrive
Template talk:Uverworld

message: Hi! I wanted to change the template into a better looking one. 
Here's how it looks like but I haven't changed the colours yet.
Albums
TimelessBugrightProglutionAwakeve
Singles
D-tecnoLifeChance!Just MelodyColors of the HeartShamrock Kimi no Suki na UtaEndscape Shaka Beach: Laka Laka LaUkiyo Crossing Gekidō/Just break the limit!Koishikute Hakanaku mo Towa no Kanashi
The old one is not that neat but that's what I think though. Any help?
Amaya Sakura (talk) 07:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template
Talk:Berlinka

message: This article is interesting and well done. Lets hope the road does as well, crossing borders and connecting people with equal ease. Thank you, Shir-El too (talk) 05:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well done... 

message: There is no need to move it to Berlinka (Autobahn), this name seems to be used for most contexts. If you disagree, please use WP:RM to move it from its original name - the one under which it was created and DYKed here.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope this comment is not to my address - I do not have a clue to what your are talking about! Cheers, Shir-El too (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I was referring to this.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  01:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I agree: if it's going to be defined then Highway or European highway would be better. Shir-El too (talk) 09:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

text:  Is it Edit-War? At least for the record: on de.wikipedia there is a current discussion on whether Berlinka or Reichsautobahn Berlin-Königsberg is the proper article name. To my feeling the page name move here on en.wikipedia was premature. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Template talk:Infobox MMA training association

message: I have serious questions about the accuracy of a win-loss field. First, the only source that I can think of that has numbers for team win-loss is Sherdog, which is rather unreliable when it comes to team affiliation (see Georges St. Pierre for an example, he switched camps to Jackson's but it still lists BTT Canada). It's method for calculating wins by a camp is also inaccurate, see their best team records page and Team Hughes in particular. As far as I know, people have fought under the Team Hughes banner a total of twice (once by Lawler, once by some other kid), yet the team is listed with a record of 62-9. It aggregates the fight records of all current members of a team, even if a member has fought under other teams before. As such, unless there is an accurate source for these records, I'm going to remove this field from the box. hateless 20:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Team win/loss
Talk:Ikeda Nagaoki

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips  for writing better articles. -- Yamara 20:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Soil biodiversity

message: This article has very little to do with soil biodiversity- it focuses almost exclusively on the non-living aspects of the soil ecosystem.
A more fitting title would be 'Abiotic factors on soil biodiversity'. As it stands, most of the article should be replaced/removed or otherwise re-worked.
Neuralnewt (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title and contents don't match
Talk:Second Japanese Embassy to Europe (1864)

message: I don't like using breaks just for looks, but the article is still too brief to accommodate its excellent photographs without cluttering, or even overwriting the text (which it was in Firefox when I found it). Thus, I've added three dreaded break tags with instructions, while paring down the captions and rearranging the pics a little, to make the article look well, for now. -- Yamara 20:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on use of breaks
Talk:High school ice hockey in New York

message: I think this article, along with all other articles about high school hockey should be deleted. Here's my logic. A few admin decided to delete the article on Washington State High School Hockey. Based on that, if we should delete one state, we should delete them all.SJHAGoalie (talk) 12:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pennsylvania high school hockey which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:45, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Luke Schenn

message: :Created player page for Luke Schenn - I think he fits notability standards, fairly significant international experience (similar to Drew Doughty), projected as a high first rounder for 2008 as well. Leafschik1967 (talk) 20:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was wondering if we should add a peice in Schenn's leadership.  He has already had a couple fights while standing up for teammates.  The most notable being against Chris Neil.  I also have a link form the National Post on how Ron Wilson thinks Schenn has been valuable.  http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/postedsports/archive/2009/02/01/leafs-notebook-schenn-shows-leadership.aspx
Just a thought.  Random24 (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He fights (poorly) a few times and this is indicative of his leadership?--Львівське (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leadership
Talk:Galton's Canal

message: I cannot find an image for this article. Cumberlidge (Inland Waterways of Great Britain, 2009) states that the remains of the lock are still visible. Does anyone know if this is the case? If it is, I might have to pop down to Somerset. Bob1960evens (talk) 21:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The pics on geograph (& therefore commons) show several drains in the area but nothing I can specifically identify as this canal. I've added a photo request for the Somerset wikiproject & might try to get there myself at some time, however if you do get to Somerset you will be very welcome.— Rod talk 07:32, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I visited the site, and could find no trace of a lock, either near Peacock Farm, which is where the 1845 map shows it, or near the junction with the River Brue. Bob1960evens (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:St Thomas More Catholic School, Bedford

message: A couple of editors it seems have been including an unsourced name in a 'notable alumni' section to this article. Despite my attempts to establish notability I cannot find ANY sources on google who even mention who this person is. In order that we can establish notability we must provide a source? Could any of these editors provide a source? Otherwise I shall ask for a wikipedia 3rd opinion on this? Bleaney (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Guidelines for alumni are here - Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines#Who should be included?. Listed alumni must ne notable in wikipedia terms. The onus is on the person adding to demonstrate notability. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Tagishsimon, I hope this clears the matter up. Bleaney (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

text: It would be easier if you would tell us why this person you are trying to add is notable, than to engage in barratry. Pointing us to examples in other pages where people have not followed wikipedia guidance is not a very effective argument. History in libraries is mainly held in books. Tell us which book. Inded, tell us anything about the person. That would help. sheesh. --12:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Notable Alumni' 
Talk:Indian cricket team in Australia in 2007–08

message: Seeing as how this page is now protected (doubtlessly because the controversy surrounding the 2nd Test and the tour in generally) unregistered users cannot contribute. I would like to suggest that as the ACT Invitational XI Tour match now has the ACT flag, then the Victoria tour match should have the Victoria flag:  72.27.162.248 (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that okay now?  Ansell 20:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, the lack of a flag seemed odd since in every other article flags are used to represent the teams (when a flag exists to represent them that is). Any idea on when the article might become unprotected?72.27.57.42 (talk) 01:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  May be after the Test Series is over. Err!... Sreesanth may be on his way to Australia for the Twenty20 and CB Series. May be a week or so after the CB Series is over, I presume.167.131.0.194 (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags for Tour Matches

message: The Indian team is declared for the Twenty20. Since the page is going to be protected indefinitely, someone needs to update that. The CB Series Main Page is updated I guess since Indian and Sri Lankan teams are both there.167.131.0.194 (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Indian Team for Twenty20

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Indian cricket team in Australia in 2007–08. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080201041809/http://cricket.com.au:80/default.aspx?s=newsdisplay&id=40743 to http://cricket.com.au/default.aspx?s=newsdisplay&id=40743
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 23:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Template talk:Lymphoid malignancy

message: Why is Hodgkin's Lymphoma in the other category?  See this journal article on the discovery of b-cell lineage: http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/2/411?maxtoshow=&HITS=&hits=&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=hodgkin%2527s&searchid=QID_NOT_SET&FIRSTINDEX=&volume=94&issue=2 
There is a good list of related articles at the bottom.
A good article on CD20 expression in Hodgkins
http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/5/1278 
Mikebar (talk)
:Agreed (per this among other sources.) I have moved it. --Arcadian (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks pretty darn good! Mikebar (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hodgkin's

message: The gastric MALT is almost exclusively found due to heliobacter virus if I remember right.  So would those lymphomas be more at home with the virus family? Mikebar (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Arcadian (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good work - wish I has such a concise chart when I had my website.  Mikebar (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MALT
Talk:Solfest

message: D.pendleton (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

message: It seems inconsistent. The infobox and Performers section focus on the festival. Other sections frame their content in terms of the organization. I think it's completely appropriate to discuss the backing organization, but it seems more natural for the article to primarily discuss the festival itself, with the Organisation heading being dedicated to discussion of the company that backs it. I just did some work on the article, but I don't feel confident that I understand which topic the article is primarily focused on.
Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article focused on the festival or the backing organization?
Talk:Ivan Stevanović (footballer)

message: This player plays for a professional football club and has been in a national squad. This is enough to establish notabilty, and more than enough to get past speedy deletion criteria. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And since when has Reuters not been a reliable source? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not the point. The subject is not noteworthy. Just being on a professional sports team doesn't make one noteworthy, and just being listed in a newspaper doesn't make one noteworthy.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, but the consensus is well established that playing for a professional football team does establish notability, and being in the national squad establishes much greater notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Please post a link to the appropriate policy page confirming the noteworthiness of such individuals.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My impression was that professional doesn't necessarily equal notable, but playing for a team in the top division in any national league is enough for notability in pretty much any sport.  I placed the original speedy tag for lack of context, but I agree that it should be kept now.  I've added the appropriate stub tag. --Finngall talk 08:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

text: WP:BIO#Additional criteria Phil Bridger (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ljubomir Fejsa

message: This player plays for a professional football club and has been in a national squad. This is enough to establish notabilty, and more than enough to get past speedy deletion criteria. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's quite right; in fact, I edit-conflicted with you in removing the  tag. Joe 21:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His league appearances are listed as 128, but the individual totals add up to 190. This in turn should change his total overall appearances to 255.46.7.195.132 (talk) 08:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know how you got that number, but I have updated his club statistics. SLBedit (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Hopefully it's corrected. SLBedit (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition wrong in player stats,
Talk:English cricket team in New Zealand in 2007–08

message: Shouldn't this page move to English cricket team in New Zealand in 2008? What's 2007 got to do with this Tour? Dick G (talk) 04:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. No worries. Cheers Dick G (talk) 07:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move or rename?
Talk:Bedfordshire on Sunday

message: I am a bit confused by the verification issue you imply, are you saying the sources for legit news groups are not verified? The sentence clearly says that the same story was picked up for national news organisations. However I can't see how it adds anything to the article. I think that section should be removed and all those citations removed! I don't think it adds anything important to the article. Govvy (talk) 21:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See my comment above. Do any of those sources actually mention the BoS or say that BoS's story was picked up by the national media? If they don't, then they do not verify the claim. The fact that a story appeared in the BoS before it appeared in the national media suggests this is probably what happened, but it's WP:OR to make the claim without a source which makes it clear this happened. Nil Einne (talk) 22:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think we should remove it all. Govvy (talk) 22:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The point with showing examples of how local news can be picked up by national and international news is important not just for this article, but as an example about how local news fits (or used to fit) into the supply chain for stories of interest. Local newspapers are a dying breed sadly, but the stories they raked up in local communities often made a difference. Consider this article in the Press Gazette about how the lack of local press coverage may have indirectly contributed to the disaster of the Grenfell Tower fireShritwod (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  firefighters news reports.
Talk:Shelby Charger

message: The revision of this page I reverted into the current one didn't read at all like an encyclopedia article, so I immediately thought it'd been ripped off from some other source. A quick google presented enough proof this was indeed the case ( ). Furthermore, the text had been contributed by an anonymous user, which makes it even more likely the text was copied. Jupix (talk) 21:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Guanosine diphosphate mannose

message: A suggested IUPAC Name is here: [(2R,3S,4R,5R)-5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1,6-dihydro-9H-purin-9-yl)-3,4-dihydroxytetrahydrofuran-2-yl]methyl (2R,3S,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl dihydrogen diphosphate
Please post if approved.--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 04:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested IUPAC Name