Talk:Uruguayan Primera División

message: :Image:Uruguay football association.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Uruguay football association.svg

message: Peñarol is not the same that CURCC, they are differents. If you want to say they are the same just find out a reference and cite it. --Vought.bolso (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peñarol = CURCC? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:La Liga which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 13:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Primera División of Spain which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 18:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: In the section Professional Era there are a couple of mistakes. First there is a type-o in "Progresso" for "Progreso".
Then there is an outdated fact: "The most success club is Peñarol with 37 titles", that should read 38 (as in the list).
Finally, I think there is a factual mistake here: "It took 54 seasons before a club besides Peñarol or Nacional won a title, when Defensor won their first title 1976." Unless I misunderstood the idea of the sentence, it focuses on the period of time between championships won by teams other than Nacional or Peñarol, and that is 45 and not 54 (1976 [Defensor] - 1931 [Montevideo Wanderers] = 45).
Kimur (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating and corrections 

message: I find it odd to call this page "Uruguayan Primera División". It sounds as if that is the actual name of the league. Why not stick to one language? Either "Primera División de Uruguay" (as used in the Spanish WP) or "Uruguayan First Division" or even the name currently redirecting to this page, "Primera División Uruguaya". Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See Primera división and also check Talk:La Liga for the last page move discussion. Several other Latin America leagues are named like this one. --Carioca (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Carioca. Thanks for your help. The discussion you kindly pointed me to is about La Liga, and for what it is worth here right now, it is of no consequence anywhere as "The result of the move request was no consensus". It does however mention an earlier discussion that would be helpful to find, which says that "as per a discussion and consensus at WikiProject Football, the format "demonym Primera División" has been chosen as the best naming format for all Primera Divisións" ( October 2009). The embedded link points to the main page of WikiProject Football, not to the discussion itself. Searching the archives, there are 38 mentions of "primera división", (32 if you type with the accent on the 'o'), but no mention of that term in 2009 or earlier, as one would expect from the claim above made in 2009. In the discussion there is also a very valid statement that says that "We do not invent English usage, especially when the result is a little-used Spanish-English hybrid. This is a fundamental tenet of WP:NAME resulting from WP:V.". I agree with that, it is the point I am making. I am contacting user Digirami, to see if he can point us to the right archive where the discussion would be. Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 21:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Finding the right discussion is going to be tough. There have been several that have essentially lead us to the naming of this and similar articles. The first revolved around consistency. For a while, all the Primera Divisions following one of two naming formats (using Uruguay as an example): Primera Division de Uruguay or Primera Division Uruguaya. The one Primera Division that did not follow that format was La Liga. I believe we settled on the former, with La Liga staying as is. After a while, it became quite apparently that the settled naming format was not the common name in English usage (keyword there). While all the leagues are referred to in their native Spanish (simply Primera Division), the adjective used to the differentiate between would naturally be in English; the demonym. Referring to these leagues as First Division should not be considered since it is not used. Neither should the official names since they are in not common usage and vary in complexity from league to league. The current format is a compromise and is the best compromise. There is precedent, albeit few since primary official languages are pretty much exclusive to their countries and the names of the leagues are unique, especially in Europe. The one notable precedent is Austrian Football Bundesliga. I'll get around to finding the relevant discussions soon. Digirami (talk) 06:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Digirami. I guess a lot of work has already gone into this, but nonetheless would still like to pose the question: would it not work calling them all "Primera División" with the country name in brackets, as is the came with cities and town with the same name? So we would have Primera División (Uruguay), Primera División (El Salvador), Primera División (Bolivia), Primera División (Chile), etc. Does that not look like a workable solution? Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title in two languages 

message: Uruguayan is the person's affiliation/nationality; Uruguay is for the nation. Co "Uruguayan Primera División" is incorrect id the original Spanish is "Uruguay Primera División".Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 19:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name = Uruguayan Primera División is a mic if English and Spanish and is uncorrect 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion