lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Larry Joe Campbell

message: He also is rumored to have starred in a local 1996 indie movie, Get the Hell out of Hamtown, a movie which no one has ever seen, as far as I can tell. 141.217.173.176 18:30, 21 December 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard of it. It's even listed on the IMDB. But alas, I haven't seen it either, nor do I know anyone who has! Robert Happelberg 19:05, 22 December 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get the Hell out of Hamtown 

message: This article is not written to demonstrate notability, and is not well structured. However, Campbell's role in According to Jim certainly seems to have been significant, and he appeared throughout the first season of American Vandal and The Orville. Were these significant roles? If so, he might meet WP:NACTOR #1, "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Perhaps this would be better discussed at AfD? RebeccaGreen (talk) 06:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Article needs to be cleaned up. Upon finding this, am not sure he won't pass WP:GNG. Probably deserves ar un at WP:AFD.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed PROD
Talk:West Virginia University

message: An unregistered editor is insisting that this paragraph be added to the lede of this article:
:In the summer and fall of 2023, WVU instituted a program of "academic transformation" that resulted in widespread criticism from national media, including Forbes, the Nation, and the Atlantic, with the last decrying "the destruction of dozens of majors and careers at WVU." The Nation summed up much of the prevailing mood: "West Virginia University is being gutted, and it’s a preview for what’s in store for higher education."
First, this is really vague. Second, it doesn't merit inclusion in the lede of the article. It may help add some additional information to the history section where this is already discussed but so far it hasn't yet even merited its own section much less inclusion in the lede. In any case, it certainly doesn't warrant or excuse edit warring especially when the reversion doesn't even use an edit summary to explain why they're beginning an edit war. ElKevbo (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Also, it doesn't have the WP:DUE weight in the body. It might be better being integrated in its respective section. GuardianH (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

text: It seems clearly worth inclusion in the pretty short lead, based on the extensive national press coverage. Should I find it suspicious that the various editors who have reinstated it there have been very quickly reverted? Any COIs in play? For my part I had never heard of the place before this. Johnbod (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Johnbod To avoid WP:RECENTISM it should have its due body weight. Given that you've never heard about the school previously and are advocating its inclusion, maybe you would be willing to WP:HANDLE in the body? ElKevbo and I have been working on highered articles for some time now; there's no sign of any COI among our edits. You should  about the university more and add to the body. GuardianH (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? This doesn't make much sense! Johnbod (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Johnbod The statement should have its weight in the body before being placed in the lede. Since you want it in the lede, you should expand the existing material in the body. GuardianH (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: "Academic transformation" in the lede
Talk:Gross world product

message: "In 2012, the GWP totalled approximately US$83.12 trillion in terms of purchasing power parity"
USD 83,120,000,000,000/7,021,836,000 (CIA world fact book population July 2012 est) = USD 11,837 would probably be rounded to USD 11,800. But in the article it says: "while the per capita GWP was approximately US$12,400" a difference of 600 dollars! 
The GWP per capital could be meant to mean nominal (but it isn't read that way as it is written)but that would be even less: USD 71,830,000,000,000/7,021,836,000=USD 10,230
The only conclusion that I can make is that CIA have used a old number for the population since the number they must have used is: 83,120,000,000,000/12,400= 6,703,225,806 rounded to 6,700,000,000 which would be close to their July 2008 est.
So why don't the numbers add up?
Nikolaj Cyon (talk) 02:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDP per capita - Numbers doesn't add up 

message: It is not a good idea to list modern estimates of world GDP with prehistorical and historical suppositions about GDP. Modern GDP only takes account of the monetary value of goods and services that are exchanged or will be exchanged. Services like cleaning your own house, cooking your own dinner, your mom baking you an apple pie are not counted as part of GDP. It seems unclear how you can translate this idea to a premonitory society especially a band of hunter gatherers.  There is only one source for the historical and prehistorical estimate and this source's methods could be yielding bizarre results. Modern estimates based on actual data and not on a purely theoretical model should be listed separately from his estimates derived from an untested theoretical approach.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.206.156.67 (talk) 03:41, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical And Prehistorical Estimates should be changed
Talk:Morgenthau Plan

message: "Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place – that only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization."
This quote appears to be unsourced, and the Wikipedia article pre-dates any other references I can find online.
Is it an example of citogenesis?
*Here is your source, straight from the state.gov archives of the US.--ZemplinTemplar (talk) 01:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced quote
Template talk:Windows-stub

message: It would be really nice if, when people wrote pages, they clicked on the links they included to make sure they went to the right place. This is particularly true for templates, which (because of a bug) only get reparsed in page X when page X is modified. Noel (talk) 19:23, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: MediaWiki 1.6 fixes this bug; see m:Help:Job queue. Seahen 13:17, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: links

message: How about changing the logo to this one: 
Wenli 01:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, I think that would be way too big to be considered fair use. -- Wenli 17:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I didn't size it for the page... Can we make something which brings the windows logo to mind, yet which is not an actual logo? Like, I can draw a wavy box with the colors red, yellow, green, blue, and that is not their logo. Right? Althepal 02:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hang on, that crystal clear picture is NOT fair use problem - it is a free license. Althepal 02:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change logo 

message: Shall we use this:  --Titan602 (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing logo 2 

message: In my opinion, a healthy debate is good for changing the logo. But, just going out and changing the image to something irrelevant, and potentially inflammatory, is simply childish and counter-productive. For example, I just reverted a change which set the image to a swastika.
My gut feeling is that this template should use the same image as WikiProject Microsoft Windows. But, I'm not going to just go and change it with no discussion... ;)
So, frustrated editors, please think before changing the image. Ensure that it's appropriate and relevant. Using imagery which has direct relation to Microsoft Windows is not helpful to anyone. And, consistency is key. Having one image on the template one day, and another the next, is not very good for the end-users of Wikipedia.
And that is my rant for this morning. ;) -- Lewellyn talk 12:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant logos 

message: This is what I have so far:
Not sure why it looks like that, but if you view the actual SVG file in Firefox, it looks fine. (what I am talking about is the blue circle in the middle.)
azure talk × contribs 17:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated it with a newer one... --azure talk × contribs 18:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Contribution:
Talk:OSEK

message: Hi, within the main article I found this: "Comment - Two of the above claims are contradictory: 1. "Only static priorities are allowed for tasks." 2. It uses priority ceiling, which states: "The protocol works by temporarily raising the priorities of tasks in certain situations, thus it requires a scheduler that supports dynamic priority scheduling." IMO words are difficult to explain the concepts, better rely on flow-charts etc. see the PDF by NXP which I added to Further reading. If the part is still contractionary, please clean and I suggest by re-writting. --17387349L8764 (talk) 21:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction found
Talk:Abdolkarim Soroush

message: Giordano Bruno is one person see  --Pouya 19:49, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a  tag to the #Religious democracy section, because it is unclear to what extent it is reporting and to what extent it is commenting on Soroush's views. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 14:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 
Talk:John T. Scopes

message: In this article it says Bryan offered to pay his 100 dollar fine, I obviously don't know if this is true but it doesn't seem to make sense why would the prosecutor offer to pay for the fine?  Could someone please clarify this for me.  SirGrant 07:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paying the fine?

message: I see that the $100 fine was recently changed to $500, but although the reference listed does state a $500 fine, every other place I look on the web (for example http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/statcase.htm) has it stated as a $100 fine, and they seem a tad more reputable.  Perhaps it needs to be reverted?
Azitnay (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fine Amount

message: I undid the edit by 97.82.219.172 for the ruthless deletion of the link  without discussion. I added the site but it is not mine neither do I agree with it. It appears, however, to have some interesting and possibly pertinent information. Its presence seems acceptable to me but I am willing to discuss it.Daytrivia (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit undone
Talk:Louis le Brocquy

message: Is this true:
::He is the first and only living artist to be included in the permanent collection of the National Gallery of Ireland.
Notjim 20:02, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this: "In June 1956 le Brocquy represented Ireland, with the sculptor Hilary Heron, at the Venice Biennale. Among the works shown was A Family. It was awarded the Nestlé-endowed Premio Aquisitato", see CIRCA Art Magazine, and "The picture was sent for exhibition at the 1956 Venice Biennale, where it was awarded the prize, Premio Acquisito Internationale, and purchased by the Nestlé Corporation for their headquarters in Milan where it hung until 2001", see 2 . So perhaps, not such a prestigious prize... --Myrabella 22:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. Thanks for that digging; some interesting stuff in the article you found which is worth weaving into this article...Bridesmill 23:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 
Talk:A Christmas Story

message: One detail in the movie places the time as no earlier than Christmas of 1947.  In the Flick flagpole scene, when the fire truck arrives, a black Chevrolet police car immediately follows from the opposite direction.
The black Chevrolet is very clearly a 1948 model which would not have been on sale prior to late in 1947. Shoulderboards (talk) 06:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't "date" the movie. If anything, it is an anachronism, like numerous others sharp-eyed viewers have pointed out. This was not a big-budget production with endless set designers, prop people, production assistants, etc. The movie's creators often made it clear that the time period was intended to be around 1940, and certainly not post-war. Don Columbia (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating “A Christmas Story” 

message: Maybe someone can look up when it was that A Christmas Story was first aired on broadcast television in the United States (as opposed to premium cable channels) and add that information to the article.  My first experience of this movie was a nighttime broadcast on television at home in the Dayton, Ohio, market around Christmas of 1984 or Christmas of 1985; our household didn't have cable then; I assume it was a network-wide broadcast on ABC, CBS, or NBC, not just a local programming-choice.
President Lethe (talk) 04:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast television
Talk:Dewey, Cheetham, and Howe

message: I was going to add something about the old three stooges skit on this page, but then I found this.
[]
It is word for word, I don't know if this was copied from them or they copied from this article, but it should be noted.
-Fuzzy
If you read the bottom it states:
:This article was derived fully or in part from an article on Wikipedia.org - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of the wikipedia encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.
There are alot of mirror sites like this on the web, that copy from wikipedia for profit. Jon, Conqueror of Men | (Talk!) 23:20, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Hey! Here's the   DEWEY, CHEATUM & HOWE INC. corporate registration... wait a sec... "Date of Involuntary Dissolution: 08/31/1998"... that can't be right. OK, here's CLICK AND CLACK INCORPORATED..."Date of Involuntary Dissolution: 12/31/1990". What's going on here? It's in Massachusetts, right? Ewlyahoocom 07:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a real company?
Talk:In Case You Didn't Feel Like Showing Up

message: In the end credits of the video it's stated that it was filmed at the Riviera Nightclub in Chicago. According to other sources on the internet listing up tour dates, the band only visited Chicago once during the 89-90 tour, on the 31. December 1989. Meaning that it was a new year's eve concert and in fact the last concert of the 1980's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.209.88.240 (talk) 22:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That was only a few video clips they edited in during the last song. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 00:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different recording date
Talk:Indeterminism

message: I have a problem with the author's logic here.  The statement, "Thus the presence of y does not imply the presence of x" could perhaps have been more correctly stated as, "Thus the presence of y does not confirm the presence of x." Determinist (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

message: A very low quality article. That part is easy to determine just by a first glance. It is so far off, it even puts one off from an attempt to fix it. And in fact most of these articles on determinism/indeterminism/predictability etc. and the N disambig pages that duplicate the terms are pretty confused, and often incorrect. It will take major work to clean them up, and it will be better to just do a clean rewrite. History2007 (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Low quality article

message: Koch's view of free will is along the lines of "pragmatism", it's mora a semantic divergence from those who argue for "strong" free will, than epistemologic. I don't know much about Kane's position, only that he's a "libertarian", which is nearly the extreme opposite of a "pragmatic". Read "How Physics and Neuroscience Dictate Your "Free" Will", from SCIAM. The title is already telling, "dictate", and quotes for free will. He just hypothesizes that physical indeterminism could be "used" to produce random behavior, in the brains of "bees, beagles and boys". Random behavior is not a loophole for a supernatural/not physically determined "free will" to take charge, or even some eventual hypothetical natural "free will mechanism" as it seems that Kane imagines. It's still natural physical determinism, and quite simple, like a roll of dices is deterministic. If Kane's free will isn't "supernatural taking charge" (under a cursory reading, it seems it is not), it's at least more complex than sheer randomness, not something that would be the same for any organism with nervous systems hypothetically sensible to quantum randomness, but apparently exclusively human. --Extremophile (talk) 17:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koch's "free will" is nothing like Kane's 

message: The section of the article titled "Intrinsic indeterminism versus unpredictability", doesn't clearly state whether quantum mechanics is indeterministic, or simply unpredictable.
Whfiwh (talk) 21:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intrinsic indeterminism versus unpredictability 

message: The lengthy introduction to the "Philosophy" section of this Indeterminism article is a great essay! But it's a poor example of encyclopedic style, lacking even a single reference. Do any editors have thoughts on how to remedy this? Bob Enyart, Denver KGOV radio host  (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lengthy intro to the "Philosophy" section is a great essay...
Talk:Santa Cruz Island

message: How is Santa Cruz a privately-owned island when The National Park Service own up to ten percent of it (as claimed in this very wiki article)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.84.191 (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does it say that? Griffinofwales (talk) Simple English Wikipedia - Come and join! 21:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privately owned? I think not 
Talk:Anacapa Island

message: :Image:Anacapa-island-nps-map.gif was here, not sure why.  Now it's in the article (gallery).  --Seattle Skier (talk) 10:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: So which is it, Anacapa or the Farallon Islands that has the largest Western Gull colony. Both articles do not have a reference for their assertion.
2606:6000:FECD:1400:891F:D69E:6AAB:8673 (talk) 01:40, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I added Citation Needed tags to both claims. Doctormatt (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western gulls
Talk:Fire Temple

message: I made this into a disambig page, since anyone coming across mention of a "fire temple" in an archaeology text woould be rather confused by the previous redirect to the Ocarina of Time game. If someone could put in actual information, or can think of a better way to do the redirect, that would be great- I don't know much about either subject, really.-FZ 21:17, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Property and Environment Research Center

message: I was unable to find any websites critical of this organization. If anyone else can find anything, that would help to balance the article. Nathanlarson32767 21:26, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this sentence is based on conjecture, I don't know if we can count it as "encyclopedic" "Although PERC's free market environmentalist theories are similar to the Cato Institute's, PERC has not drawn the same amount of fire from liberal environmental groups. The reason may be that PERC has preferred to focus on education and analysis, rather than criticizing the Worldwatch Institute and similar environmental organizations". There is a source but it's not directly related to the information disclosed in the sentence. --Lanov (talk) 04:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Conjecture?

message: Does anyone know the budget of the organization, and its number of staff and volunteers? What about its founding date; was it 1980 or 1982? Thanks, Tisane talk/stalk  05:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget, staff, volunteers, founding date, etc.
Talk:Haydar Ergülen

message: ok, delete those articles that I took from other sites. Haydar Ergülen,Lale Müldür, Dağlarca and some others. ı'm actually quite sure that the original writer of those biographies would let us to have them in wikipedia , but delete them anyway. I assure you all that I will write better equiped original articles for Turkish poets in one or two months...— Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.251.202 (talk) 21:33, December 21, 2004‎ (UTC)
:Why don't you talk to the original author?  We will gladly keep these texts, but copyright laws are not a jokeMikkalai 22:09, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Original discussion
Talk:List of contemporary Turkish poets

message: == Delete ==
ok, delete those articles that I took from other sites. Haydar Ergülen,Lale Müldür, Dağlarca and some others. ı'm actually quite sure that the original writer of those biographies would let us to have them in wikipedia , but delete them anyway. I assure you all that I will write better equiped original articles for Turkish poets in one or two months...
:Why don't you talk to the original author?  We will gladly keep these texts, but copyright laws are not a joke. Mikkalai 22:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: ok, delete those articles that I took from other sites. Haydar Ergülen,Lale Müldür, Dağlarca and some others. ı'm actually quite sure that the original writer of those biographies would let us to have them in wikipedia , but delete them anyway. I assure you all that I will write better equiped original articles for Turkish poets in one or two months...
:Why don't you talk to the original author?  We will gladly keep these texts, but copyright laws are not a joke. Mikkalai 22:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:Master Mariner

message: Okay--in use from the 13th Century or introduced during the 19th Century?  I moved this as part of a cleanup; not my area of expertise.  Quill 22:02, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I feel pretty confident that merging this page with Captain (nautical) makes sense.  Any thoughts? Haus42 01:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggsted

message: I completed the merge as per Talk:Captain (nautical) without getting rid of much material at all. Haus42 22:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge completed