lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:La Salette, Isère

message: :Our Lady of La Salette refers to an apparition of the Virgin Mary that allegedly appeared to two shepherd children - Maximin Giraud and Melanie Calvat - near La Salette in 1846.
Does this mean that "Our Lady of La Salette" is some person who somewhere in her writings referred to that alleged incident?  If so, it should say who she was, perhaps by linking to some separate article about her.  If not, the sentence should be rephrased.  At this point I suspect that whoever wrote this meant that "Our Lady of La Salette" was one of the two children, or perhaps was the apparition.  If so, it should definitely be rephrased, to say so explicitly, so that I won't have to just suspect that that's what was meant.  This habit of writing "A dog refers to an animal that barks" instead of "A dog is an animal that barks" is an all-too-frequent solecism on Wikipedia. Michael Hardy 01:14, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks -- I actually rephrased the article before you answered. Michael Hardy 23:49, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Please clarify this point

message: Books, blogs and websites are not neutral sources, they can be as biased as a piece of political literature.  An encyclopedia article should contain facts and give equal copy to all sides when there are controversies.  
"Freemasons" was a general term used by the Church for its enemies during the 1800s and early 1900s. Church leaders and some Catholic writers dismissed all opposition groups as "freemasons", as all anti-fascist groups during the 20th century were easily dismissed by fascist governments as "communists". It's a propaganda technique. 
Highdesert 17:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still Needs Rewriting - Neutrality is Questioned
Talk:Karl-August Fagerholm

message: Moved from another page, more suitable here:
:In 1956 the Social Democrat Fagerholm got one elector's vote less than needed to be elected, and Urho Kekkonen was elected. (Fagerholm served however three times as Prime Minister, and after that as Speaker of the Parliament.) 
--Ruhrjung 13:15, 17 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Mangy Parrot

message: Nice article, seems well researched (hopefully by the contributor him/herself). If what it says in the text really applies, links might be created from Journalist (at the bottom of the page -- "Journalists turned novelists") and Picaresque novel.  --KF 14:18, 17 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: ... And what do you think "perico" means...? Duh.Kangarugh22 20:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This book is better known, including to English speakers, by its actual title than by this translated one. The article used to be under the Spanish name, and it should revert to that. 128.148.235.72 (talk) 19:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title: El periquillo sarniento vs. The Mangy Parrot
Talk:Augustus (title)

message: I think, not pl. (pluralis) Augusti, but gen.(genitivus casus) Augusti. Why pluralis? -LinasLit
:"Pl." is the abbreviation of "plural". The nominative plural form of augustus is augusti. Yes, the genitive singular form of augustus is also augusti, but that is mostly irrelevant to the article; by general convention, Latin nouns in English text are only declined in the nominative case, singular and plural. Publius 12:19, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural vs. genitive 

message: I've cleaned up the talk page to use headings to hopefully help the flow of comments a little.  I've not changed any existing text, but merely tried to add headings and divide the jumble as appropriate to lend some clarity.  Ashdog137 21:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk page cleaning 

message: The article appears to have been split from an article on Augustus (the emperor himself) so as to discuss Augustus (the title itself).  As such, I don't see what relevance the Triumphs section has, as it appears to discuss the triumphs of the emperor, rather than information about the title.  In the absence of comments to clarify, I intend to remove this section in a week.  Ashdog137 21:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of Triumphs section? 

message: Theodoric, king of Ostrogoths and Italy, and Chlodwig, king of Frank, both used title of Augustus, but seemed not to claim imperial status  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greutungen (talk • contribs) 12:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Augustus outside of ROMAN EMPIRE 

message: Such a smart and well-written article — and not a single source cited. For some reason, this tickles me.
If anyone's still actively tending this article, I wonder whether a section might be added on the use of the title Augustus/-a for deities, which I think (only my impression) occurred only after Octavian became Augustus. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  oh, the ironies of WP 

message: Why aren't these titles capitalized? That's the convention in the literature. I realize that, normally, free-standing titles do not get capitalized, but in this case, they're also names, so it's a bit different. And, again, the convention is to write of "Augusti", not "augusti", from at least as early as Gibbon, and still today (e.g., Schultz' section "The tetrarchy: a new form of imperial rule, 293-312 C.E. in A History of the Roman people). - Eponymous-Archon (talk) 17:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Srnec (talk) 00:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: Social Networking 2603:8081:5601:4B6E:B528:B2DA:C081:AC3F (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  August, eighth month of the Gregorian calendar. It was named for the first Roman emperor, Augustus Caesar, Sextilus,Roman
Talk:Animals Should Not Try to Act Like People

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Word of Life (Sweden)

message: "You cannot serve both God and money." Matthew 6:24
"No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money." Luke 16:13
In fact, these two verses as two witnesses speak better than tons of books written about prosperity Gospel.
-- Mtodorov 69 13:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, sorry, but this page is for discussing the article Livets Ord, not the topic in itself, otherwise as for preparing the addition of neutral-in-tone text in the article. Those sources are primary, and secondary sources are required to be used in the article. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 09:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prosperity Gospel 

message: I believe it is more accurate for Word of Life to provide the Word of Life Youth Ministry. an infobox could be provided there to link people to this page. if there are more than two articles that Word of Life could apply two, perhaps a disambiguation page is in order. --Master Runner 22:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about renaming the Word Of Life to Word of Life Fellowship which seems to be their name according to their website , make Word of Life a disambiguation page linking to that article and this one? Entheta 23:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: In the 1980s and early 1990s, there was a lot of controversy surrounding this church, as reported in the article, but since the mid-90s or so, they have kept a lower profile and become less controversial. I'll see if I can find any sources for this; if so I'll add something to the article. --Bonadea 09:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there is something about this in the introduction -- I was reading the "criticism" section. That's all right then.--Bonadea 09:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent developments 
Talk:Paperinik

message: Ok, I've moved everything here and I've added some info about PK. I also changed the picture, since the old one wasn't that nice. Lazarus Long 23:16, 17 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: He was called Patomas in Spain, "Pato" being Spanish for "duck".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.60.69.109 (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paperinik in Spain 

message: pl:Superkwęk
actually - "Superkwęk" is more like "Super Quacking" then "Super Duck". "Kwęk" is by no means a term describing an animal, but the sound it makes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.222.86.72 (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Paperinik in Polish
Talk:Pickering Nuclear Generating Station

message: Do you think the person who wrote this article meant CANDU reactor, not CANDAR? M123 00:54, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: older discussions

message: What about using  like this article has: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_Nuclear_Generating_Station ?? Altonbr (talk) 14:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Gibraltar

message: Please remove the duplicate paragraph in the intro section: 
Since Brexit, Gibraltar is not a member of the European Union but negotiations are under way to have it participate in the Schengen Agreement to facilitate border movements between Gibraltar and Spain.[20] As of March 2023, talks seem deadlocked.[21]
Since Brexit, Gibraltar is not a member of the European Union but negotiations are under way to have it participate in the Schengen Agreement to facilitate border movements between Gibraltar and Spain.[20] As of March 2023, talks seem deadlocked.[21] Dxks10080 (talk) 23:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannolis (talk) 23:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2024 

message: Asqueladd, do you think that even Gibraltar being one of the pillars of Heracles is not lead material? פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk 18:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not masked as part of the urban history. It can be useful in the introduction of the article of the Rock of Gibraltar, and perhaps in the introduction of this article (when the rock—the geographical feature—is mentioned).--Asqueladd (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, even though I don't agree I won't argue about that. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk 18:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient history in lead 

message: national_representation1 = Nus Ghani
The Minister of State for Europe has changed. ParliamentarianCA (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Liu1126 (talk) 12:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2024
Talk:Deborah Tannen

message: Does anyone have info about Dr. Tannen's earlier books?  218.61.32.9 03:06, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier books 

message: I'm having a hard time finding these three edits serious: , , , the last one at least because its from the same ip. They had however not completely been detected, so I cleaned it up as good as I could: . --78.82.196.231 (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: This article does not mention that D.T. has come under fire from her own peers for conducting anti-scientific research that is hateful towards women.  She has written things such as to say that men take over internet pages that are geared towards women.  She based this opinion on her observations of the early days of the internet and her own perceptions of what she considered a masculine vs a feminine internet page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.150.35 (talk) 02:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male Bashing And Other Unscientific Writings ==

message: So I just recently found (and bought) a hardback copy of I Only Say This Because I Love You (Random House, 2001), and the subtitle of this edition is different from the one in the article.  Instead of "Talking to Parents..." mine is subtitled: "How the Way We Talk Can Make or Break Family Relationships Throughout Our Lives."
It seems as through the subtitle was changed when the book was released as a paperback in 2002.  Is there any way this can be accounted for in the article? --Andresg770 (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Only Say This Because I Love You 

message: In this podcast (just past the 19-minute mark) she herself states that her books were the inspiration for the material stated by the character Wilson. I don't know if this is usable. Mapsax (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Home Improvement'' inspiration?
Talk:Gaillardia

message: I found the name misspelled, so I moved "Galliardia" to "Gaillardia". --Jose Ramos 04:34, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: Gaillardia needs full sun and at least 6 to 8 hours of direct sunlight a day. They will flower poorly in shade and may develop powdery mildew.
Gaillardia prefer well-drained, loose, and sandy soil. They are not particular about soil pH.
Gaillardia will perform best in moist soils, but are highly drought tolerant.
Keep weeds under control during the growing season. Weeds compete with plants for water, space, and nutrients. You can cultivate often or use a mulch to prevent their germination.
You can plant gaillardia seeds outdoors in late spring after all danger of frost is past. You can also start seeds indoors 4 to 6 weeks before the average last frost date.
Before planting, you can mix a light application of a balanced organic fertilizer into the soil. Once established, many varieties will persist as short-lived perennials in climates with moderate winters. FloridaGardener352 (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultivation
Talk:Stored-value card

message: What was the point of separating telephone prepaid calling cards. They are just a variant of stored-value cards. Mbstone 07:03, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Why separate

message: What is the difference between a gift card and a stored-value card?
Why are there articles on both?
See gift card.
--Bill.albing (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gift Card
Talk:Minister for Magic

message: Isn't he called the Minister for Magic in the British books? At any rate, I created a redirect from that page to here. -- pne 13:50, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Thought so. -- pne 13:51, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: wouldn't it make more sense to have the main page at the British version, since it's a British novel originally?Harry R 13:56, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minister for Magic 

message: Is there any need to have this page at Minister for Magic (Harry Potter) and a redirect at Minister for Magic? I dont think there is another Minister for Magic that old Fudge's post could be confused with. Supersaiyanplough|(talk) 11:00, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig?
Talk:Agricultural revolution

message: This page should "not" be a redirect to British_Agricultural_Revolution. The content was moved precisely because this article should cover much more than the british revolution. Making it a mere redirect is just extremely reductive. Either leave it like it is now or delete the page, but it is not a mere redirect.
There is reference to the first agricultural revolution and the third.  What is the second?  M Pinck 13:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The date given for the Neolithic revolution is incorrect. It did not start 14K years before the present. --Saukkomies talk  01:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected. —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 14:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Errata

message: From the page i think that the Neolithic revolution occurred between 10,000 and 5,000 BCE, not BP. Jack.alvarez (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:06, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 10,000 BP is confusing or wrong

message: There is vandalism here. Would someone take proper action? PraeceptorIP (talk) 01:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism at end of page
Talk:Knowing Me Knowing You with Alan Partridge

message: What is this "(-with-the-least)" things? --Menchi 06:29, Aug 18, 2003 (UTC)
: Yeah, took me several minutes to realise what it meant - The Host with the least (as opposed to the host with the most). I'm not sure if it's a catchphrase from the show, but it's definitely an awkward construction inthis article. I think I'll just delete it. GRAHAMUK 07:18, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Biosphere

message: Quote: "Regarding energy, it is an open system, with photosynthesis capturing solar energy at a rate of around 130 terawatts per year."
The expression of energy rate as "terawatts per year" is wrong, as energy has the dimension of effect times time, so the unit is Watt times Second, stated as Joule.
"energy rate" (that is, energy per time unit) has the unit Watt.
The statement uses faulty units, the correct units cannot be deduced from the sentence. Henrikoesterbro (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Also, looked up the ref and put in the correct figure (100 TW rather than 130).Rocknrollsuicide (talk) 22:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong unit of energy used
Talk:Bling-bling

message: I'm confused... has nobody here ever heard the song "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" before? The line goes 
:Desmond takes a trolley to the jewelry store...
:Buys a twenty carat golden ring... (bling!):
It wasn't a rapper that invented this, it was a group of dysfunctional British guys in 1968.
--  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.82.190 (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In 43 years on this planet, I've never seen any such cartoon -- and as a child, I practically lived in front of the TV set--even when reading a book or playing a board game.  76.243.106.37 (talk) 22:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bling origins 

message: Bling may be over.  References:
* 
* 
--John Nagle (talk) 21:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The end of bling 

message: WP:Not a dictionary:  Quote: "
Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a slang, jargon or usage guide." and fails the Notability test WP:N —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.243.106.37 (talk) 22:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just impressed that somebody actually had the guts to link something rap-related to "Materialism." PurpleChez (talk) 02:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

text: See also, from WP:Not a dictionary, "In some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject, such as Macedonia (terminology) or truthiness." Bling-bling falls into the same category as truthiness. -199.173.225.33 (talk) 13:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend page for deletion 

message: This article seems to go to great lengths to establish that Lil Wayne/Cash Money did not come up with the term. But I think its still important to mention that the song bling bling is what established the term and popularized it in mainstream usage.
His role in popularizing the term is discussed, but within context.  The most passionate source arguing that Lil' Wayne "established the term and popularized it in mainstream usage," is/was, well, Lil' Wayne.-199.173.225.33 (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  popularization 

message: The intro to this article is wrong, the first use (I know of) in rap is in Naughty by Nature's Here Comes the Money from 1993. 144.24.20.229 (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First use in rap... 

message: Can someone please find a citation for this part "It was popularized by Cash Money Millionaires in the song "Bling Bling" in 1999." Bulbbulb29054 (talk) 04:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation for part... 

message: "Undeniable" is marked as a weasel word.  How is that so?  The word is strong and not slippery.  Its use in the sentence might well be unwarranted, misleading, incorrect or unfounded, but it is not weaselly. Kdammers (talk) 05:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  undeniably
Talk:PaintShop Pro

message: In the list of "changes" for every new version, a lot of those supposed "changes" are actually bugs that were found in beta releases but were mostly fixed in the actual sales releases. Not only does "changes" not stand for bugs, that's also a rather NPOV strategy applied on this article. --2003:EF:1709:2980:C0BE:14D8:D6B:6D1F (talk) 07:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Changes" 

message: I downloaded it but nooo it says I didn’t download 2605:59C8:1FA:C500:F016:1BF1:8DCC:7012 (talk) 09:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  😡😡😡😡😡
Talk:Athos (character)

message: Does anyone mind if I fix this?  My recollection is that in the novel, the battle takes place in the English Channel, as the Musketeers are returning to France after their unsuccessful attempt to save Charles I from the scaffold.  Mordaunt has secretly mined the ship with gunpowder, intending to blow it up and escape on a small boat, but the plot is discovered, the Musketeers escape in the boat, and as Mordaunt appeals to the Musketeers to save him from drowning, Athos, remorseful due to the events regarding Mordaunt’s mother in the the preceding novel, acquiesces and tried to pull Mordaunt out of the water, only to discover that this was a trick by Mordaunt, who attempts to pull Athos under so that they drown together, and Athos is forced to kill him. 
If no one objets, I will make the change. Partnerfrance (talk) 10:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underwater fight in the Thames
Talk:List of battles 1901–2000

message: There are many other battles not on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EZ1234 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't understand why the Battle for Australia is not listed here, arguably one of the most important battles of the Pacific Theatre yet it's not even listed here?
Is this list for real? Or is it just a joke??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.192.240 (talk) 06:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle for Australia??

message: I believe that the Beer Hall Putsch does not qualify as a battle (combat in warfare). I will remove it. Any objections? --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer Hall Putsch 

message: 1941-1945 reads like a US history book about the pacific war. There are hundreds of missing battles from the rest of the world. The definition of what is a "battle" is also unclear. Is an attack on a convoy really a "battle" -just because lots of Americans call it one? If every British Empire military action against the axis in Africa during the Second World War was a "battle" there would be another 300 entries. Lets not even get into the thousands of discrete battles between the USSR and Germany. Thoughts? Maybe introduce regional subgroups? Delete actions below a certain threshold based on personnel or length? --IseeEwe (talk) 01:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously Underdeveloped and biased
Talk:Lily of the valley

message: Did you know that Suzanne means Lily of the Valley? (It also means rose.)
:Indeed, anonymus. See my addition of the possible Biblical etymology of the name of this flower. In Modern Hebrew, Rose is more properly translated as "Vered", but Biblical botany is a largely unexplored field... JFW T@lk 23:32, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzanne means Lily of the Valley 

message: Is Convallaria majuscula a valid species name?  The Convallaria article doesn't even mention it. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Tt's now C. majalis var. montana per the 2nd ref on that sentence.  EvergreenFir (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "''Convallaria majuscula''"