lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Overland Park Arboretum and Botanical Gardens

message: This was a pretty good wikipedia page in 2005. It needs a lot of updating so I updated the article and added more sources. Please let me know if anything was wrong and feel free to correct any mistakes. ― TaltosKieronTalk 14:58, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  updated the article + still needs work
Talk:Public Library and Baths, Balsall Heath

message: The reference for the book, City of Birmingham Baths Department 1851 - 1951, does not have an ISBN so therefore it cannot be verified. It was taken from a library, so, I am unaware if it is available for purchase. - Erebus555 17:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has a COPAC entry. Andy Mabbett 17:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: City of Birmingham Baths Department reference
Talk:George Adamski/Archive 1

message: - I find it incredible that the Straith Letter is listed in this article while the story relies solely on the word of James Mosely. Apparently the writer of this article is skeptically inclined? The words of a self-confessed prankster (fraud) seems to weigh more heavily then that of supporting witnesses (upstanding citizens) of the Adamski case. Mosely came out with his story decades after it allegedly transpired. His co-conspirator passed away by then and had destroyed the typewriter where the letter was typed on. Solid evidence my ***.
: I gave a complete reference, and a copy of tthe acual letter is reproduced on page 332 of that book.  I found a few mentions of it on the internet, and I'll provide a second reference. And, according to the first reference, the copy of the letter is in the Gray Barker Collection at the Clarksburg-Harrison Public Library in Clarksburg, WV.  You can check there. Bubba73 (talk), 20:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is just a relevant fact.  Adamski used it as proof of his claims, and it proved to be false.  The reproduction of the letter in Moseley's book does show it to be on the letterhead. According to the book, it is in the library I mentioned.  You can check it out for yourself.  Bubba73 (talk), 19:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  At present, the Straith letter is the only referenced thing in the whole article.  It even has two references - a primary reference and a secondary reference.  A couple things to see are Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources.  Bubba73 (talk), 14:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Straith letter
Talk:N postcode area

message: The 1917 & additional Coverage columns may be a bit misleading. I thought I was looking at past and present. Why not make the additional coverage column something like "Cuurent coverage" and, for example, for N8 add Hornsey into the column. Just a thought. hjuk 18:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that that is actually a good idea - north London has changed a lot since 1917, and postcode district names are considerably out of date. The dropping of the district names from addresses in 2004 has also made area boundaries considerably more 'foggy' and has potentially made areas a lot more free to expand, contract and move. Dark-Fire 18:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Column Headings
Talk:Ivan VI of Russia

message: That picture is clearly a woman, something not adequately explained for someone is who is referred to as "he" throughout the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.12.252.113 (talk) 06:12, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that he was only 1 year old when he came to the throne, I assume that is simply a picture of him at a young, rather androgonous, age.  Also, it was apparently not unusual for the European royalty of this time to dress their sons in (by today's standards) quite feminine clothing.  For example, see the picture captioned "Louis as a young child" at Louis XV of France. LarryJeff (talk) 21:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: That Picture

message: Am I missing something, or is this one of the cruelest tales in history?  Throwing an innocent two-year-old child into maximum-security prisons, and keeping him there throughout his adolescence?  Isolating him from his family at age three?  Ordering him to not be educated?  The end of the article even has a sentence fragment claiming that he never saw the light of day for 20 years.
The article implies that there are two villainesses responsible for this:  Elizabeth and Catherine II.   If these two figures actually deserve any sympathy at all, the article needs a rewrite, because I'm coming away utterly disgusted by these women. 174.24.46.24 (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That wouldn't be professional. Sure it was sad but so many other royal rivals have been locked away, tortured or killed when another line comes to power. Like the Prince in the Tower.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure it would be professional to provide enough information to allow the reader to arrive at valid conclusions about the ethics of Elizabeth and Catherine II. 174.24.46.24 (talk) 04:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruel in the extreme 

message: The statement that he "never actually reigned" is incorrect. He was Tsar, albeit under a regency.Royalcourtier (talk) 18:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did actually reign 

message: I think the arguments against the original image are convincing (additionally the original image source www.fine-art-images.net/de/showIMG_15300.html is blacklisted on English wikipedia). I think we should use the proposed substitution Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Actions
Talk:Dipsea Race

message: It is a claimed on this article (with a source), but if you look at this RunnersWorld article (and confirm with a Google search of those races names) there are several races which have been going on longer (namely the Delaware YMCA Turkey Trot in Buffalo, NY, see their webpage which states it was established in 1896) . Also, the Boston marathon has no claim that it is the oldest American foot race. This all leads me to believe this claim is probably false. I'm going to be bold and drop the claim from the article (although the oldest trail race seems to still be the truth). Wgunther (talk) 04:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it the second oldest foot race in the US? 
Talk:Mountains of East Kerry

message: The "Mountains of East Kerry" is not a term that is widely used (if at all) for this small range.  The more correct term is Mangerton Mountains (or Mangerton Group).  I have listed out the 26 peaks of the range in the Mangerton Mountain article and I think it would be better to REDIRECT this page to it.  There is no point in having a separate page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Mangerton Mountain
Talk:Teraina

message: Does someone know how to get there nowadays? Sounds interesting for the article! Belgian man (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry for the late reply: since 2 years it is easier to travel to Washington Island, with a weekly flight from Christmas Island. Those islands are accessible from Nadi Fiji or Honolulu, through Fiji Airways (also a weekly flight) but no more international flights are available since March 2020 (Covid-19) until 2021. And maybe more.--Arorae (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to get there? 

message: The link to the constitution was dead so I found the new one, revised 1980, here.  This version states that the name is, "Maiana Teraina (otherwise known as Washington)."  However,  makes no mention of the word "Maiana," and I suspect Teraina is the common name.  Should the text be changed to reflect the two constitutional names?--otherlleft 02:38, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Since it has been changed. Constitution of Kiribati gives the link to the 1979 text. Teraina is only an alternative name (and Washington Island) is used nowadays.--Arorae (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maiana Teraina 

message: Exploring Teraina or more precisely Washington Island started at the very end of the XVIII Century.--Arorae (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exploration
Talk:Apportionment

message: I read this page and I still have no idea what apportionment means.  You can't use the word you're trying to define in its own definition.  Somebody needs to rewrite this to make it decipherable. 96.35.31.33 (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: I read this page and I still have no idea what apportionment means.  You can't use the word you're trying to define in its own definition.  Somebody needs to rewrite this to make it decipherable. 70.198.194.99 (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:Michigan's at-large congressional district

message: I redirected this article to Michigan's 1st congressional district rather than Michigan Territory's At-large congressional district since it refers to the district after Michigan became a state. The 1st district is the more logical choice since the territorial district elected delegates rather than full representatives, and it seems more logical to view the AL district as just another district once Michigan had enough population to justify multiple districts. I suppose ideally it could be its own article describing the district when it represented the entire state. That might be overkill though. --Sprkee 17:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to 1st Congressional district
Talk:Will Youmans

message: I have removed the prod because he seems to be notable enough for an article; if nothing else, he seems to meet WP:Band, with two albums out and various tours. I am actually not related to him in any way that I am aware of, although it is likely that we are distantly related; I happened across this while looking for names to add to Youmans. Brianyoumans 17:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod Removed

message: One of his counterpunch articles from 2002 said he was a 3rd year law student. Couldn't find info in quick search. In case anyone works more on article. Too many articles, too little time.... CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Law student - Attorney?
Talk:1695 in the United States

message: What does this mean? There was no "United States" in 1695... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhollm (talk • contribs) 17:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Let's depict history as it was back then, not as things are now. The USA didn't exist before 1776.  J 1982 (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Barrymore family

message: For the reasons listed above do people take to camping so much with themselves like real families do. The only way the people can be in charge over the conduct placed on the way the people operate in public is to get at the heart of any good situation. In other words, fact check every name and number and you can find out these people never lived together.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:7751:160:3C04:704D:4DD4:4198 (talk) 15:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insiders 

message: The article's main section begins withe the following:
:1. William Edward Blythe (1818–1873), married Matilda Chamberlayne (1822-1849), they had seven children
:2. Herbert Arthur Chamberlayne Blythe (aka Maurice Barrymore 
Is Herbert Arthur one of the seven children of William Edward Blythe & Matilda Chamberlayne? If so, in the family tree down below there should be a line from William and Matilda to Herbert. Instead, William's name just hangs there along side Herbert's with no notion of the relationship to anyone else. Ileanadu (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Edward Blythe relationship to others? 

message: I love how hard it is to read on IOS because many of the family names are one letter per line 2605:A601:AE11:C200:9199:6BB2:4176:8C93 (talk) 22:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family tree 1
Talk:Jack Reynolds (footballer, born 1869)

message: To Djln - I note that you have reverted the re-ordering of the article to undo my edits in  February. It seems to me that your recent edit summary contradicts what you have actually done. i.e. the opening paragraph should be a brief overdue of his life and achievements with the actual career history following in approximately chronological order.
You now have the contents half way through the article (rather like an American TV programme), whereas they ought to come straight after the first paragraph. I think that the opening paragraph should stop after the reference to winning the double in 1897 and the remainder of the second paragraph should be merged back into the career history. 
Best wishes. Daemonic Kangaroo 17:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry for my ignorance, but why are John and Jack being used interchangeably throughout the article? Was he known by both names? Nehme1499 18:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  John or Jack?
Talk:Washington Square Park (Chicago)

message: This article is very well written and well referenced. Good organization of subcategories. It could use some photos to help clarify things, and I think the 'related fora' section could be expanded. But these are fairly minor and I don't think worthy of holding up GA status. Cheers! Dr. Cash 19:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will get photos soon.  It is raining today or I would take some.  I may take some tomorrow.  I am just worried my photos may be a bit dreary because of the weather.  Maybe I will wait for a good spring day.  TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 20:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review
Talk:Cambridge High School (Cambridge, Ohio)

message: Victuallers 17:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mobile porn

message: Reads like an advertisement.  I'll clean it up a bit so it doesn't get deleted.  Mathiastck 01:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more wiki 

message: Cell porn is a shorter article on the same topic. It has better references. The Wired article it links to calls it "Mobile porn". The http://www.maccongress.com/ page is the Mobile Adult Content Congress, not Cell. I propose merging from there to here. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't appear to me that either of them have any references. My thought is just to delete them both. Thedreamdied 19:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, I can find the references all right. But it seems I can't get feedback about the merge one way or the other. I'll just be bold and merge, then; if you want to delete them, at least this way there will only be one article to nominate for wp:afd. :-) --AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Beechcraft L-23 Seminole

message: Most of the non-US military operators operated the civil Twin Bonanza and not L-23/U-8 variants, should they be moved back to the Twin Bonanza page or should it be made clearer what they operated in the military operators section ?. MilborneOne (talk) 23:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right - I thought of that later after I was finished with my edits. GO ahead and move the no-US ones back, or I'll try to get to it myself as soon as I can.- BillCJ (talk) 23:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Operators

message: Can the caption be changed on the photo of the crew working on the RU-8D from Korea to Vietnam?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arod138 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the caption? 

message: Hello, dear friends, just to let you know that I've found the "new" website about Joe Baugher's lists of planes (serials by year of fabrication, etc.).
Here : www.joebaugher.com USAF serials (check at the bottom of the page, there are tons of links that are marked as "permanent dead link" in this article).
Sorry, my english sucks, but I hope I helped a little --Friday83260 (On discute ?) 16:55, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New links for Joe Baugher's website =) 
Talk:Bell XP-52

message: There is a dating anomaly in Jones. The sequence of events presented runs:
#On 25 November 1941 the XP-52 was canceled in favor of the XP-59.
#On 3 October 1941 the XP-59A jet-powered project usurped the P-59 designation "already assigned to the defunct XP-59".
The anomaly is that the XP-59 project was apparently started a week or so after it was already "defunct". The resolution would seem to be either there is a mistaken date here, or that the XP-59 was a spurious project dreamed up solely as a cover story for the jet. Does anybody have access to a source which reveals the truth of the matter? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating anomaly
Talk:Unknown Stuntman

message: Per Wikipedia policy on copyright, complete song lyrics are forbidden in articles, therefore the lyrics to this copyrighted song have been removed. 23skidoo 18:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Song lyrics deleted

message: How was The Fall Guy theme song sung by Lee Majors in 1984 of the show started in 1981? 
I could see where maybe the long version could have been performed by Lee Majors or released in 1984 as there were some slight variations between the two ( long & short) versions. Lita M. (talk) 03:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Unknown Stuntman
Talk:Webster–Hayne debate

message: The section "A brief summary of the debate" is taken directly from
http://www.constitution.org/hwdebate/hwdebate.htm#A%20Brief%20Summary%20of%20the%20Debate
The copyright text on the page is "by Hal Morris - Copyright 1996. May be copied, but not in any way sold without the author's permission."
If this means that the text should be removed from this page, then let that be done. I do not know whether that warrants removal.
I will link to this page as a reference, whether it is removed or not.
Rychach 00:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section taken from constitution.org 

message: The article relies too much on “Schouler’s analysis,” a long excerpt from a work published in 1891. Some anonymous editors have “improved” the text, so it no longer works as a direct quote of the material. The edits cannot be automatically undone. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 14:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Schouler’s analysis” both obsolete and inaccurately quoted
Talk:Who's That Girl (1987 film)

message: Just a quick note that I nominated this article for a DYK nom. Great work Legolas! Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK nom

message: I've attempted numerous times to improve and decrease the length of this article as well as remove the POV editing which so obviously tries to make the madonna's acting attempt look like less of a failure. An editors who are obvious madonna apologists won't change a thing and this is aganist wikipedia policy. The editor Landshade who claims I caused "massive problems" due to a few easy to repair references is obviously biased. Catherine Huebscher (talk) 5:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: First, its Lake not Land. Second, due to comments and your obvious view of the artist your edits are not permitted. Your edits do not seem in WP:GOODFAITH to better the article; it seems that you have a personal vendetta against her. Claiming the article "is too long" for its commercial and critical performance is not a logical reason. Yes there are over detailed sections which could be improved but massive section blanking without consensus is not acceptable. Please stop and wait until the author of the article has replied, thanks. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 01:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

text: You know what, I was willing to look into your points, but seeing your biased POV, nah, forget it. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Great work, Legolas! Madonna is both great artist and person so it is obvious that it is kind of personal vendetta. This movie was a huge hit in Bulgaria. It is akin to Big Trouble in Little China which has been box office bomb but remains a cult classic. 37.63.99.49 (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 

message: I would like to welcome opinions of users who think that the neutrality is disputed. I'm open to any points as long as it is not biased and not clouded with personal attacks. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I just watched the movie and just reminded it to double check.
Neither one of the dock workers is Stanley Tucci.
No way !! 2601:18F:E82:A10:3962:975:5CCE:AAC1 (talk) 02:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Tucci ???
Talk:Extinction (psychology)

message: 71.40.28.18 18:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This is a good point. It might be useful to include a section on clinical applications of extinction where the parallels to exposure therapy are outlined. Melissza (talk) 12:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is substantial information on extinction in operant conditioning page. The material could be reorganized or merged. Kpmiyapuram 14:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not expand the article before merging, see if there's anything that might merit its own page? Correct me if i'm wrong, but extinction does apply in classical conditioning, right?--Janarius 01:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with operant conditioning 

message: I think we can do better.
--1000Faces (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only 1 reference? 

message: This is a large field that has occupied the work of many great scientists for almost 100 years. There needs to be much broader and correct attribution of ideas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scholar38 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  we can do better 

message: The redirect Extinction (psychology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 18:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Extinction (psychology]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of newspapers in Iran

message: I saw "Gooya" and "Baztab" in the list, these are not newspapers (they're news websites), so I added --♥MehranVB♥ ☻talk | ☺mail 18:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed
Talk:Bennet Wong/Archive 1

message: I am a first-time editor in Wikipedia.
I object to the two pages I am editing being removed while I am developing them.
Bennet Wong and Jock McKeen (the two pages in question) should not be removed. They are significant figures who deserve to be represented here.
The problem is that I don't know how to make the changes necessary to keep the pages (Jock McKeen and Bennet Wong) alive.
Please send me specific suggestions about how to prevent the deletion of the pages, and I'll get to the editing lickety split.
Thanks
William Meyer 19:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the Wikipedia page WP:NOTE for a good start.  Also read WP:PROD for steps you can take to contest the deletion.  Thomas Dzubin Talk 19:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I have completed the basic text and the references now.  I believe this satisfies the Wikipedia standards for "reliable independent third parties." I will continue to add references and refine the text.
William Meyer 16:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing to Reliable, independent third-parties