Talk:Nagoya

message: The following is according to the City of Nagoya's website, found here (although in Japanese).
The maruhachi became the city symbol in 1907 (Meiji 40) in recognition of the progress of the city, the 20th anniversary of its founding (the city had existed since the early 1700's but was founded as a city in after administrative changes in the Meiji period), the opening of its port, and because other cities in Japan like Kobe and Yokohama also had city symbols.
An open competition was held but apparently no submissions were deemed acceptable and after deliberation in the city assembly, they decided to use the seal of the Owari Tokugawa family. The circle of the seal represents infinite power or strength, while the hachi is an auspicious number because the bottom is open, representing unending development. The phrase on the website is as follows:
「丸は無限に広がる力、また八は末広がりで発展を示す」
The symbol of the 地下鉄 (subway) in Nagoya is the maruhachi, with the hachi turned into railway tracks and the maru turned into a tunnel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:79E5:5B00:28AE:7AE7:6AFC:1A8F (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maruhachi Mark 

message: Nagoya, Aichi lists Paris, France as a sister city/partner city, but the Paris page does not. Could anyone confirm this? samwaltz 22:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have the 2005 year book(official fact book,名古屋 我的都市) issued by the nagoya city with me,and it doesnt mention paris as a sister city.It only states 5 sister cities ,namely(with the years they bagan the partnership) nanjin(1978) turin(2005)sydney(1980) mexican city(1978) and finally Los-Angeles (1959)..SO both paris and pittsburgh are not in the list
--Iwazaki 12:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister/Partner Cities

message: Why isn't this article at Nagoya, which redirects here? john k 00:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a very good question. I don't think there are any other places called Nagoya that approach the significance of this one. --Polaron | Talk
The city naming conventions have no specific rules for Japanese places and being unambiguous and more commonly known as simply "Nagoya" rather than "Nagoya, Aichi", I am going to go ahead and move this to "Nagoya". --Polaron | Talk 00:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I am a bit less convinced for the case of cities and prefectures that have the same name. In Japanese, these places are almost always disambiguated by type, e.g. Fukuoka-shi (Fukuoka City) or Fukuoka-ken (Fukuoka Prefecture). It is rare to refer to a place without its type unless very well-known. It could easily be argued that Fukuoka mostly refers to the city but I don't think it is clear cut. I might actually prefer to move "Fukuoka, Fukuoka" to "Fukuoka City" instead. --Polaron | Talk 01:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not at [[Nagoya]]? 

message: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which aren't even as big, are at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  As far as one can gather from wikipedia, there aren't even any other places in Japan called "Nagoya".  It is the center of the third largest agglomeration in the country, it shoudl be treated like Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, and such. john k 16:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree completely with the move. Nagoya is more well-known than Aichi-ken and is reasonably well-known even outside Japan. I think all the designated cities should be moved to the unqualified name (if unambiguous or clearly the primary usage) since they do function somewhat independent of their prefecture. --Polaron | Talk 16:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that Nagasaki does not even fall in that category, and is already at its own location, presumably because people know of it because of the atomic bomb. john k 17:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is ridiculous. 

message: The city's name was historically written as the older Emperor of that time (also read as Nagoya)
What does this mean?  There is no "Emperor Nagoya" (or was it an alternate name of one of the Emperors?) and of what time? Nik42 06:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It sounds like an interesting point, but it's unclear what you are trying to say. Could you explain a little more here, and we can try to come up with a clearer way to say it.114.161.229.100 (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I moved that section to the top and rewrote it a little. Someone please check the kanji to make sure they are correct. I omitted the part about the older Emperor, but if someone knows what he meant, please add it back in with some explanation.114.161.229.100 (talk) 13:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The history section completely omits that Hideyoshi used Nagoya as his mustering base for the invasion of Korea in 1592.  Didn't he do a major renovation of Nagoya castle at this time?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.96.14 (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything about that in the Toyotomi Hideyoshi article. It mentions the invasions of Korea, but nothing about basing the attacks in Nagoya. This article about Nagoya has nothing about Hideyoshi or Ieyasu Tokugawa, or the Odas in the History section. That would be a good addition to the Nagoya article.114.161.229.100 (talk) 01:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I'm wrong. At the top of the History section it does mention Ieyasu Tokugawa as the one who built/rebuilt the castle when he moved his base from Kiyosu in 1610.114.161.229.100 (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added the briefest of references to Oda, Toyotomi and Tokugawa at the top of the history section.114.161.229.100 (talk) 01:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are confusing Nagoya Castle (Hizen Province)(名護屋城) with Nagoya Castle( 名古屋城). ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 01:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This article has some Japanese names written Japanese style, which means family name first (Oda Nobunaga) and some English style, which means family name last (Ichiro Suzuki). They should all be either one way or the other. I think English style is less confusing for most English-speaking readers of this English article, but all the names in Japanese style is better than a mix, which is extremely confusing to native English speakers.114.161.229.100 (talk) 03:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The guidelines for dealing with Japanese names are provided in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles). Historical names are normally written using the Japanese style, so there appears to be no problem here. --DAJF (talk) 03:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, unless you're an average native-speaking reader of the article, who has no idea there are two different name formats, and that historical names are last name first and modern names are last name last! Otherwise, no problem....! "So, how long did the Ieyasu family rule the Nagoya area?" This is especially non-sensical, because modern Japanese people still use the last name first format - he's called "Suzuki Ichiro" in Japan. 114.161.229.100 (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Native English speakers need to understand and adapt to this scenario, because this scenario is the reality in the English language, whether one knows it or not. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I just added a note at the top of the History section explaining the name format.Ghostofnemo (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese names

message: The train tracks in the original photo make the city look a bit rough. It is, but.... The new photo was probably an attempt to give Nagoya a smoother image. Maybe there is a better photo out there that people can agree on, or room for multiple photos? I do think any photo used should be wide angle and not centered on any particular buildings.Ghostofnemo (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of Nagoya skyscrapers 

message: I'm not sure what the best thing to do is but somebody should change the part about Italia Mura because it has gone bankrupt.  I have heard that there are plans to re-open it but I don't know anything for sure.  Thanks haplo (talk) 18:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italia Mura 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 06:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Nagoya]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Nagoya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090710004619/http://en.ce.cn/World/biz/ to http://en.ce.cn/World/biz/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I am not sure who added all these pictures lately (seems to be from an IP address), but please note that this is not Wikimedia Commons or a picture gallery. If images start squeezing out text and make the appearance cluttered, then there is a problem. Unless someone can give convincing arguments why this should remain, I will start a cleanup and pruning process here. Gryffindor (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  too many pictures 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Nagoya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100202011555/http://www.city.nagoya.jp/global/en/ to http://www.city.nagoya.jp/global/en/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080209191819/http://www.city.kiyosu.aichi.jp/en/sightseeing01.html to http://www.city.kiyosu.aichi.jp/en/sightseeing01.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110115145437/http://www.city.nagoya.jp/somu/page/0000019808.html to http://www.city.nagoya.jp/somu/page/0000019808.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160313131917/http://www.chubu.meti.go.jp/tyosa/point/data/point-nagoya.pdf to http://www.chubu.meti.go.jp/tyosa/point/data/point-nagoya.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302233835/http://greaternagoya.org/html_en/ind_05.html to http://www.greaternagoya.org/html_en/ind_05.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130090343/http://greaternagoya.org/html_en/ind_03.html to http://www.greaternagoya.org/html_en/ind_03.html
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6cDpylpTE?url=http://www.brasemb.or.jp/portugues/community/school.php to http://www.brasemb.or.jp/portugues/community/school.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326233826/http://www.yoshinoantiques.com/kimono.html to http://www.yoshinoantiques.com/kimono.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140727212120/http://voices.yahoo.com/miyazakis-wind-rises-ignites-debate-japanese-box-12282476.html?cat=37 to http://voices.yahoo.com/miyazakis-wind-rises-ignites-debate-japanese-box-12282476.html?cat=37
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)