Talk:1943 Cairo Declaration

message: Photocopy of the Cairo Declaration U.S. National Archives & Records Administration (RG59), reproduction of Japanese National Diet Library shows no signatures. Copy of text can be read at wikisource or external website. Oniows 12:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original text 

message: In the content, an Japanese personal by the name EvergreenFir kept insert two references and a commentary section about Allies did not want to return Taiwan, however, those two references are faked US or UK government archive site. http://www.taiwanbasic.com is maintained by Japanese organization for unknown purpose, pretend to be US and UK archive site.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cariostatement (talk • contribs) 04:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The document is legit.  Please see http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=goto&id=FRUS.FRUS1951v07p2&page=1481&isize=text  I will replace the citation with this link if it helps you. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese organization insert fake URL as reference 

message: Oniows please state you reason when erasing all the added text. The Japanese National Library clearly stated the Cairo declaration was signed. The document you shown in the external link is merely a telegram to inform the radio operators of the time about when and what. Also the website you obtained the photocopy stated that it was signed but you choose to only include the picture. Why do you have to hide the desciptions? So I replace the external link to the page that has both the photocopy and Janpanese government offical descriptions. Please do not play any GAMEs here.
One last point. Japanese Instrument of Surrender, which is surely signed, clearly states the acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration which referred to this Cairo Declaration.
Xplorer 23:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did you erase all the added text? 

message: An official announcement resulting from a meeting or conference. The orginal of the word is French.
Xplorer 23:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of a communique

message: To save space, summary instead of the entired text.
Xplorer 23:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The detail of the Declaration is replaced by a Summary 

message: I've commented out the section about the Senkaku islands because the text might be original research. The conclusion that the islands were not transferred to China by the Cairo Declaration is not supported by a citation and the Declaration also talks about giving lands taken by Japan before 1914 such as The Pescadores to China. Please discuss further instead of reverting again.--Sus scrofa (talk) 09:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Senkaku Islands is the name used on the wikipedia page for those islands.  It's the name we should use here. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section about the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: It appears that the government of Taiwan may have backed away from its previous reliance upon the Cairo Declaration:
Thim, Michael and Turton, Michael.  “The Chinese Cult of Cairo and the Status of Taiwan”, The Diplomat (July 17, 2017).
 Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: DPP rejects the document; KMT embraces the document. It depends on which party is in charge. Matt Smith (talk) 10:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Matt, do we have a reliable source saying what you just said? Happy New Year. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy New year, Anythingyouwant. There are a number of Chinese reliable sources show DDP's rejecting the document out of its pro-independance position and KMT/CCP's severe criticism of it out of their pro-unification position. There are also a few English reliable sources show that. Matt Smith (talk) 07:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROC Backtracking?