lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:President of India

message: The comparisons of President with other institutions don't really seem constructive(also pointing out the subheading). Maybe a paragraphed description about the differences about each authority would rather suffice. Trying to establish a consensus. Interesting Geek (talk) 22:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with other government institutions 

message: Under the sub heading of living former presidents, name of Pranab Mukherjee should be added. 2402:3A80:100B:336F:A5A5:4774:94D8:23A5 (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He's dead since 31 Aug 2020.  Peter Ormond 💬 13:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Not done: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 November 2021 

message: I don't get how the president can be elected by mean of the single transferable vote. That's a vote used with one vote in plurinominal constituencies, which mean voting for one candidate, with several of them elected. If there's only one candidate, that's just First-past-the-post voting. Or is the election ran under Instant-runoff voting?--Aréat (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this, it is rather Instant-runoff voting.--Aréat (talk) 21:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  single transferable vote? 

message: In the section, "Living former presidents", the image of late honorable Mrs Pratibha Patil should be removed. She expired in 2012, and thus contradicts the aim of section. Utkarsh555 09:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How is she "late" and when did she "expire"? As far as I know, she is very much alive.  Peter Ormond 💬 13:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Role of president 2409:4073:16:1146:A55B:ABFC:4F17:F7F3 (talk) 18:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of president 

message: Functions of President 2409:4071:E15:6356:0:0:7E4B:DB0A (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Functions of President 

message: need to add 2022 after date 25 July 103.249.233.94 (talk) 10:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 July 2022 

message: Please! Update this article as well.    (भारत के राष्ट्रपति - विकिपीडिया (wikipedia.org)) TheManishPanwar (talk) 04:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi Wikipedia 
Talk:Wittering, Cambridgeshire

message: I don't think this should be speedily deleted. It's by a newbie, who didn't know to link it back to Peterborough, and who might be back with more info. I'd rather call it a substub. -phma 03:31, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Wittering disambiguation page says that this Wittering was "formerly the two villages of East Wittering and West Wittering". If that's true, then it should be mentioned in this article. And if it's not true, then it should be removed from the disambiguation page. --Zundark (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No response after a week, so I've removed the claim from the disambiguation page. --Zundark (talk) 10:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Wittering and West Wittering
Talk:Midway-class aircraft carrier

message: General statistics posted by myself come from the book ONI 222-US, United States Naval Vessels, published by The Floating Drydock, Kresgeville, PA 18333 (ISBN: 0944055028).
If anybody familiar with Naval lingo can interpret this, please post it on the main page under general statistics. It is about aircraft capacity. "Aircraft; 97 F4U and 48 SB2C or 73 F4U, 27 FSF, 32 F7F." Liblamb 03:52, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:56, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: ...if they're so called after the Battle, the Atoll, or something else.  Do you know?  Chrisrus (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: After the battle, in keeping with (then) US Navy convention of naming aircraft carriers after either battles (Lexington, Saratoga, Yorktown) or famous older ships (Ranger, Hornet, Enterprise).  Midway's sister Franklin D Roosevelt was the first carrier named for a politician. Solicitr (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readers of this article want to know...
Talk:The Vampire Lestat

message: I have made a small edit and added the date this book was published.
207.166.7.210 20:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  publishing date 

message: I've read the book at least three times, and nowhere in it it says that Lestat and his mother had irreconcible differences. Unless Gabrielle's love for nature, loneliness and open spaces, versus Lestat's love for humans and Marius woudl count as irreconcible difference, then I don't really understand that part.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Brat Princess (talk • contribs) 08:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So called differences 

message: I Fixed The Naming Of Lestat's Mentor, Marius.
It Said His Name Was Marlos Or Something...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.73.57.192 (talk) 05:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  EDITED 

message: The plot summary needs lots of work - it's very brief, and it skips over most of the plot itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.254.84 (talk) 20:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary Too Brief 

message: In the film section, a paragraph beginning "As of August 2009" is followed by two undated paras describing "recent" events and then a para about a Facebook post by Rice "On May 13". This para was added at 10:18, 5 June 2011, so I have added the year to the text with a pointer to this Talk section. I have not confirmed the year. --Thnidu (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "On May 13"
Talk:RRDtool

message: This page should NOT point to itself!  RE the RRD link at the beginning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.85.255.4 (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Now, what exactly is a Round Robin Database (which was the initial search term, when coming from the RRDTool-Homepage, where they say it was a "Round Robin Database")?? Is it some kind of Circular buffer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.136.73.8 (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a database of time-based values that has a limited size even as time continues on forever. W Nowicki (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification on the subject of this article
Talk:Malabarian Coast

message: Where but at Wikipedia would the Malabar Coast be renamed the 'Malabarian Coast? Perhps it's utterly unfamiliar. Why are people so attracted to the oddest possible choice? (No I haven't counted the Google hits.) Wetman 07:02, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "Malabarian Coast" brings up three web pages on Google, while "Malabar Coast" yields 10,300 pages. The information on this page would probably best be merged with Malabar. Tom Radulovich 15:58, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Dideba

message: *I suggest the recently added transliteration and translation be removed, as it is actually the text of the new national anthem, Tavisupleba, including some minor typos. Unfortunately the mp3 sung by the National Chorus of Georgia (938 kB) does not work with my Media Player. Anybody have more luck? Tribute2jimmyk 07:30, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Moscow rules

message: Amazing to see the Goldfinger quote is incorrect and you nitwits have been farting around in here since August 2004 and never once corrected it. QED on Wikipedia.
: Go ahead and sign your comments please. That quote has nothing to do with Moscow Rules. Kortoso  (talk) 17:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Goldfinger Quote

message: I've found exactly three sites on these "Moscow Rules", which obviously have all copied from each other. Are there any trustworthy sources on these rules? or is this just a piece of fiction? Lupo 07:54, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: MoSCoW Rules

message: I've got this espionage encyclopedia (the Spy Book 2nd edition) that I picked up from a museum in Washington, D.C., and though it doesn't list the rules, it does credit them to the British instead of the Americans. --SleightOfHand 04:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not CIA but British?

message: The line "Float like a butterfly; sting like a bee" sounds fictional. That was Muhammad Ali's stragegy in the ring.
:The whole idea of "Moscow Rules" I'm pretty sure is fictional.Editfromwithout (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  They are real, but it's hard to motivate a knowledgeable person into sharing them. Kortoso  (talk) 17:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sounds Fishy

message: Here's some sources to find out more:
*Whidden. Glenn H. A Guidebook For Beginning Sweepers. Technical Services Agency.-lists 17 "Moscow Rules" as canonical.
*An explanation of Whidden's "Rules"-listing and explaining the 17 rules in Whidden's book. Attributes the existence of them solely to Whidden.
*Scripps Howard News Service-lists a total of 10 "Moscow Rules" as being canonical according to the International Spy Museum.
-The Jade Knight 19:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks (belatedly). These belong in the article.--Mantanmoreland 04:13, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: *Murphy is right. (i.e., "What can go wrong, will go wrong, and at the worst possible moment.")
*Any operation can be aborted. If it feels wrong, it is wrong.
*Maintain a natural pace.
*Build in opportunity, but use it sparingly.
*Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee. (Borrowed from Muhammad Ali.)
*There is no limit to a human being's ability to rationalize the truth.
*Technology will always let you down.
*Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action. (By Auric Goldfinger, taken from Ian Fleming's novel Goldfinger, Ch. 14 : Things That Go Thump In The Night)
*Do not attract attention, even by being overly careful.
71.80.203.159 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Other rules

message: *https://www.intelligence101.com/the-moscow-rules-unpacking-the-10-rules-every-spy-should-live-by/
Kenixkil (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Spy List
Talk:APNG

message: I believe the third paragraph would more accurately describe APNG as a successor or replacement for MNG, not a competitor to it.
My reasons are:
* Despite being called "Multi-image Network Graphics", no current browsers support MNG 
* The only browsers MNG was supported in were Netscape & Firefox
* Mozilla, the makers of Firefox, created APNG as a replacement for MNG
2601:2C6:4F80:3F1:A814:363:24BC:25C3 (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is [[MNG]] really a competitor?  

message: The simplicity of the format, plus the Specification Revisions, gives a feeling it's just a quick hack of PNG.Should we mention this ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musaran (talk • contribs) 19:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hack 

message: The table does not yet list ImageMagick. Can someone add whether ImageMagick supports this or not please? 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of computer programs and their support of APNG, along with their version numbers and release date
Talk:West, Texas

message: Someone might be able to make use of this: Victoria-era UFO sightings Rhymeless 09:03, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: As West, TX is located South of Hillsboro, it's worth noting that it isn't on I-35E, but I-35. Kd5mdk 04:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On I-35 

message: It would be useful to add the town's museum Pete unseth (talk) 21:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the museum
Talk:Singapore Idol

message: "The current season of the show will also be the last season due to the drop in viewership ratings, which is a blessing to all of humankind. (Good Riddance)" Not particularly familiar with wikipedia's policies, but I'm dead sure that this is a clear violation. Will edit in an attempt to clean up. Excelsium 00:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clear-Violation Query

message: I've spent a long time cleaning up the page so please don't mess it up. DO NOT do the table unless you are adept in Wiki-tech haha. It's harder than it looks, trust me. For accidents, there's always the "undo" key. =) Cheers! ZephyrWind (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please keep the page tidy
Talk:Deb

message: Deb, I am trying to add my knowledge of villages and hamlets in Powys, Wales. If you type Crickadarn, it goes to "An American Werewolf in London". How do I fix this? 
Yr Wyddfa  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yr Wyddfa (talk • contribs) 19:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crickadarn
Talk:You are X and I claim my five pounds

message: * I base the statement that they ran till the 1960s on the fact that I remember these from when I was a kid. I saw such a campaign  in the Sunday newspaper "The People", and the mystery man was "The Man of the People", though my memory is hazy on his exact name (it was a long time ago, and I was just a kid).
::That's interesting-- certainly explains why the phrase cropped up online in the 1990s better than if it had last been used in the 1930s. Marnanel 14:13, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: :YA x AICM5UKP
Wouldn't that be YA x AICM5GBP, or more accurately YA x AICMGBP5? The correct currency code for (British) "pounds" is GBP, and "5 pounds" is written as "GBP 5" (although still read as "5 pounds"). — Ashmodai (talk · contribs) 18:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, although UKP is widely used on cam.* for no reason I've ever found out. Marnanel 18:38, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  UR x AICM56UKP - please keep up at the back ;-) Stub Mandrel (talk) 18:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 5UKP?
Talk:Louis IV, Grand Duke of Hesse

message: Shouldn't this be at Ludwig IV of Hesse or Ludwig IV of Hesse and by Rhine (or Louis IV of...)? Känsterle 10:06, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any info on cause of death?--Pubdog (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death? 

message: The error is the last sentence under the heading "Early life". The article states: "Prince Louis was the likely heir eventual to the grand ducal throne from childhood."
Louis II had five children: Prince Louis (the future Louis III), Prince Charles, Princess Elisabeth, Prince Alexander, and Maria Alexandrovna, Empress of Russia.
Louis III was married to Princess Mathilde Caroline of Bavaria but they had no children. Next in line to inherit the duchy was Prince Charles, who was Ludwig IV's father. However, Prince Charles died three months before Louis III. This left Prince Charles's eldest son, Prince Louis of Hesse and by Rhine, to inherit the duchy as Ludwig IV. Thus, Prince Louis (Ludwig IV), who was born in 1837, only became the heir when his father died in 1877, which was only three months before Louis III died.
I think this is more than a minor edit. I was seriously confused by the error and it took me a while to figure it out. I read the Wikipedia page on Louis II, which helped me to figure it out. Unless someone objects, I'm going to correct the error tomorrow.
Starsmark (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Error on page
Talk:Rithmomachia

message: Is there a reason for removing this page? It is sometimes a real pain, finding good descriptions on the Internet. 
I thought the Link would be a good starting point to further evolve the topic.
---
And now its gone ... that was really speedy ... and no hint why :-(
:both messages posted by 62.99.135.99, 31 August, 2004
In rules said that pieces could be returned to game after capture, like in Shogi. But it looks it doesn't mention in article178.122.26.72 (talk) 13:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: from Talk:Rithmomachy (presumably relating to some prior incarnation of this page)

message: What is known about the rules of this game?
—Herbee 23:43, 2004 May 8 (UTC)
:I think we have a pretty good idea of the rules. There is a transcript of a 16th century work about the game at http://jducoeur.org/game-hist/fulke.html. --Imran 00:15, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno.  There are many different vague descriptions of the rules.  I don't know which ones are the correct ones.  O—— The Unknown Hitchhiker 18:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible that the original rules may never be deturmined. Remember, this game was around for centuries, and so it's only natural that rules would vary (note: it was an alteration in the rules of chess(queens moving in the modern fashon, rather than like a king), that led to Rithmomachia's loss of popularity). Maybe someone should get down their own interpretation of the rules, like i am planning to do. Does anybody know if there is a computerised version of this game? If not, I'll make one myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratstail91 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: from Talk:Rhythmomachy (page was moved here)

message: I think that the picture of the board needs replacing. the layout is good any everything, but there needs to be a morre technical diagram of the positions. --Ratstail91 (talk) 00:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The peices seem to be out of place. I've seen pictures of boards set up with the peices 2 places closer to the middle of the board. --Ratstail91 (talk) 03:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: The statement "If a piece is captured, it changes sides." that agrees with the source does not fit to the description of "Meeting" and and "Ambuscade" where pieces are removed from the board. --mfb (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in section "capturing" 

message: The Germans seem to have some extra knowledge to the game and its rules. Maybe someone with language skills could put up and excerpt? Google translate gives a start but maybe a native speaker would do better.
--94.223.160.154 (talk) 10:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of info in German wiki 

message: Ropey English (it should be the literature) and even ropier logic. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:6C99:F9E9:1059:8F03 (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the more so because Greek was little known at the time when the game first appeared in literature"
Talk:Ankou

message: I created this entirely from what I remember, so there should be no copyright infringement this time.  Sorry for any problems I might have caused. Selphie 12:10, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 1

message: If you Google Ankou, most of the images that appear are of a cloaked man with a scythe, but there is are images of him as a skeleton holding a scythe, so I added that in to the article.  142.26.194.190 (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Google is not a reliable resource, but I too have found images of Ankou as a skeleton. 142.26.194.190 (talk) 21:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ankou's Appearance 

message: "Ankou is also known as "Aräwn"."
In which country, which language? For sure it is not in Breton. And never heard of this name in Brittany. Gwalarn (talk) 17:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aräwn 

message: I added the Undertaker to this article, feeling that it may be relevant to modern references. Feel free to add some citation to help in this verification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.82.19.148 (talk) 22:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Allusions to Ankou

message: This article is poorly written and developed, and needs to be rewritten and expanded upon. Most of the article is poorly written and contains a great deal of information that is unsourced and underdeveloped. The entire article should be rewritten so that it's better written and formatted than what it is currently. The article is also missing information on the Etymology, and Origins of Ankou which needs to be added to the article with proper citations given for its information. Details on the beliefs on Ankou should be placed into a single section with subsections detailing the different beliefs about Ankou. The popular culture section just has a list of unreferenced bullet points and should be rewritten so that it's not in that particular format and citations given form its information. This article has the potential of becoming GA and even FA status if enough attention is given to it in order to bring it to the best quality that it can possibly be.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Peacefire

message: This article seems to not have a neutral view. The wording in the following sentence implies a non-neutral view in a way that is hard for me to describe. Here is the quote:
"They then compile a report on how biased and repressive the filtering software is."
I think that a better way to say this would be to say something like: "They then compile a report stating that the filtering software is wrong and is biased/repressive."
I would change this, but I'm not sure it'd be taken as a serious edit.
Xonybubba 16:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I just fixed that :-) Nateland 21:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: You are sorley mistaken peacefire and its affiliates have fought relentlessly for the freedom of other nations like china and south korea in their campains to censer the internet. Peacefire is a respected organization as its founder this article must stay and survive for the freedoms of all people to working forward to a better world the same goal as wikipedia.  
-- danieljackson (tlk) (cntrbtns) 06:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Global perspective

message: Why does Bennet Haselton redirect here?. I know this is a big project of his but wouldn't a seperate article on this man autobiography be better?.
I would do so but I'm not how much of a controversial edit that might be. Nateland 21:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bennet Haselton

message: When clicking on the peacefire external link, I get:
As a result, I'm removing the external link. Toddst1 (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading that message closely, all see it saying everything not checked is going to be regarded as suspicious - that doesn't mean it's saying the site is known to be problematic. -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hostile website

message: They have stopped sending out emails and have not updated their "Blocked site of the day" feature for a long while. I have been unable to find any information regarding this anywhere else, and an answer would we be highly appreciated. 38.39.221.2 (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this website still active?