Template talk:Di-no license

message: On Commons this is Template:No license --GeorgHH (talk) 12:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikimedia Commons|Commons]]  

message: I added a public domain image to my entry on Charlie Merz. I received a notice that it needed a copyright tag. I thought I added that tag, but I do not see that it appears. Also, the message indicates that I can remove the template that tells me you will remove the photo if I don't add the tag. I see no way I can remove the template. Further, I see no way to edit the information about the image without upload another version of the file. Can someone advise me.
Markdill (talk) 02:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing message about image copyright status 

message: Plz, back iwiki
fr:Modèle:LicenceInconnue
ja:Template:No license
ru:Шаблон:No license
vi:Tiêu bản:Unknown
zh:Template:Unknown
Alex Spade (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: , but I set things up so that non-admins can do it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iwiki 

message: I don't know why my edit summary got cut off as "don'". What I meant to type was "don't need the Template: part when notifying uploader". --Geniac (talk) 20:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary cut off 

message: See Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Template:Di-no_license Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Archived. --Geniac (talk) 19:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit conflict 

message: Currently, this template reads:
:This file does not have information on its copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be deleted after Foosday, 32 Febtober 2011. Please remove this template if a copyright license tag has been added.
I propose changing the wording to the following:
:This file does not have information on its copyright and licensing status. Unless the copyright and licensing status is provided, the image will be deleted after Foosday, 32 Febtober 2011. Please remove this template if a copyright license tag has been added.
The reason for this is that a file may have information on its copyright status (by identifying the copyright holder and the date of creation) but lack information about its licensing status (what license the copyright holder has released it under), and in such a case this tag, as currently worded, would seem to be inappropriate. (The  template seems to be better phrased for such a case, but the documentation there says it is meant for bot use and encourages humans to use this tag.) Any thoughts before I make this change? —Bkell (talk) 23:17, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ; I've made this change. —Bkell (talk) 07:08, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change of wording 

message: Both templates have become hopelessly similar to each other.  I request that  be used in the main template with an administrator's approval.  I will add a discussion of this proposal in Wikipedia:Templates for discussion.  Here is the template below:
  --Gh87 (talk) 21:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The big difference between this and  is that  was designed to be helpful for new users, while this template was designed for the convenience of image patrollers. --Carnildo (talk) 21:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:   added to the template page.  Sandstein  21:29, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal merge with {{tl|No copyright information}} 

message: Shouldn't this include 
(within <noinclude> tags) : 
 ?  --Elvey (talk) 23:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: Plenty of people who upload images and try their best to provide copyright information are still hit with the "di-no-license" template when a bot comes along. This is obviously because bots don't read free-form text; they simply check for a license tag. We should make it clear that this "machine readable information" is what's missing. There may in fact be sufficient information as far as a human reader is concerned.
Together with my edit to Wikipedia:File_copyright_tags (which points out a link to templates that were orphaned before), this should make image uploading a bit less stressful. Connor Behan (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  s/information/a tag/ 

message: Enough to write a lot of nonsense Why do you want to present here the drawings of the real author of the Artist Khalilbeg Musayasul as the drawings of some Azerbaijani user Seribhan? The banner of the Republic of the Union of Highlanders of the North Caucasus and Daghestan was depicted by the artist Mussayassul, and not by any impostor from Azerbaijan. This banner should be presented here as a FREE INDEPENDENT OF THE STATE. Who wants to work in Moscow, let them go there. return the flag of the Republic of the North Caucasus and DELETE YOUR HOOKS--Wrkan (talk) 09:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Enough to write a lot of nonsense

message: Please remove line  per WP:CAT#T. Categorization has been added to /doc. —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 11 July 2020