Talk:Kalaburagi

message: Hospitals in Gulbarga - Government General Hospital, Basveshwara Hospital, Vaatsalya Hospital  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmanju251 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hospitals 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Oppose not the commonly recognised name in English. —innotata 22:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Discussion can be found here. Bgwhite (talk) 08:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC on recent renaming of 11 Indian cities... use old or new names? 

message: The city is in all official documents and local language is known as Kalaburagi. The more historical name is Gulbarga so we will keep it as prime name but why revert the parameter other_name= to Gulbarga in Infobox settlement template when the main name parameter is set to Gulbarga already? Discuss before reverting. JayB91 (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate name 

message: Except Wikipedia article, everywhere the city and district is referred as "Kalaburagi" or in a colloquial dialect "Kalburgi". Isn't it time to update Wiki articles and make it consistent with common usage to remove confusions?
--Bmmanjesh (talk) 10:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What reliable sources can you cite to show that, world-wide, it is more commonly referred to as Kalaburagi, not Gulbarga? Although only a vague indication, Kalaburagi has  1.29 million Google matches, and Gulbarga has 14.6 million matches - more than 11 times as many - Arjayay (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

text: And I've changed the title back again - you can't arbitrarily change an existing discussion and set your own closing date.As with the previous discussions, You need to follow the procedure at Wikipedia:Requested moves.When you have done this properly, the proposal will automatically be included in the official proposals list, a banner will be added to the article page, and relevant projects will be informed.When the discussion has run its course, which may require it to be relisted to generate further input, an uninvolved editor will close the discussion and decide on the proposal.Please note that currently there is a considerable backlog, so this could take some time - Arjayay (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you have changed the title of this section again. I will assume good faith, and that you are trying to gauge whether it is worth your while starting a debate at Wikipedia:Requested moves.Having already failed two debates at Wikipedia:Requested moves, it must now pass a proper debate there, in order to be renamed.FWIW, in case you had not guessed, I will be opposing the move - Arjayay (talk) 09:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to move from Gulbarga to Kalaburagi - Discussion till 31st May 2020 before formal request to move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. No objections, rational move, has been relisted once and has been open for 19 days. (non-admin closure) YttriumShrew (talk) 22:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 November 2021