lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Titas Gas

message: The links in the reference section are dead. Do something about it Yourdeadin (talk) 03:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Titas Gas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110723082511/http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/26/15475 to http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/26/15475
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 Link rot had set in before url was archived. Worldbruce (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Amnesia (game show)

message: Why is February 29 written as the first show, when it is February 22?71.227.248.49 (talk) 06:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: February 29 is not written as the first show per say.  What the article is talking about is that the first episode is airing on February 22 at 8:00 PM in place of 1 vs 100.  Starting on February 29 and every friday after that the show is moving to 9:00 PM in place of Friday Night Lights and giving 1 vs 100 its time slot back.  Hope this helps. Gibsonj338 (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. Somehow I still feel hollow and empty inside. :( --166.102.104.97 (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Just as a minor point, there is still no verifiable source listed here for the statement that Amnesia has been canceled. I don't particularly care one way or the other (I'm not pining to be a contestant on the show, or anything), but if you're going to make that statement, it should be backed up (even the radio citation is theoretically fine--if you include the name of the show and the date). Samer (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancellation 
Talk:Charlie Perry (Australian rules footballer)

message: I propose that this article (Charlie Perry) be moved to Charlie Perry (Australian rules footballer), in order to disambiguate from the article I just created, Charlie Perry (English footballer). Charlie Perry should then be redirected to Charles Perry (disambiguation). --Jameboy (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed. --Jameboy (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:List of hospitals in Malaysia

message: While no links exist for most of these hospitals, this is a rather impressive list of hospitals for this country. Bill Pollard (talk) 03:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance of this list

message: The list has some sections in list form and some in table form. It has two section headings for Private hospitals. That may make sense if this list is in transition, but I'm looking for clarification. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨  13:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this list in transition?
Talk:Tirdad Zolghadr

message: Regarding the footnote to "Zolghadr [...] studied Comperative Literature":
The study of Comperative Literature, which is also known as Komperativ Littra-tjøøhr was widely popularized by the Swedish Chef. See also Chocolate Moose: http://youtube.com/watch?v=CAsYwW7pt7o 118.71.27.200 (talk) 07:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:APCN 2

message: I removed the section "Effects on Malaysia Web Hosting", because it was copied from this article:  and is probably copyright violation. 210.50.83.207 (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:KOKK

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the ICAO code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. It's not about which subject is more famous, just that the radio station is primarily identified by this name while the airport is primarily identified by its full name with the ICAO code only a secondary reference to that airport. - Dravecky (talk) 11:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Stortorget

message: Det finns andra torg av rang som heter Stortorget, varför inte nämna dem, t ex Stortorget i Malmö. http://www.malmo.se/gatortorgtrafik/ommalmosstadsmiljo/torgochmotesplatserao/stortorget.4.33aee30d103b8f159168000104575.html
:This is English Wikipedia. Please leave your comment in the English language. Tomas e (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He said "There are other squares called 'Stortorget,' why not name this e.g. 'Stortorget in Malmö.'" That was some months ago but it's still a good question. I see there is a redirect setup but the article name hasnt been changed. Stortorget just means 'big square' or 'main square' and I think most Swedish cities have one. See . It says that the name is used for 'around 23' different places in Sweden, and then lists the more notable ones. See also the slight variation [] -- Arker (talk) 00:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Revolution (In the Summertime?)

message: Not sure about it. Amazon.uk has a listing for "Revolution #2" that has a different track listing than the one given in the article. I'm guessing it was released in two versions, so that part will need changing if anyone knows for sure. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing
Talk:KKLS (AM)

message: KKLS AM was formerly KEZU, which was originally licensed in on August 14, 1959.  It was granted a modification of its license to change its call letters to KKLS on July 9, 1971.  This information is listed in the online record at the FCC, here: Broadcasting Station License Record, but I'm not exactly sure how to add this to the article so I'm leaving it here instead in hopes that someone better than I am at updating Wikipedia will do so. Cardweaver (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early history
File talk:Flag of Georgia (U.S. state).svg

message: The font here isn't Times Roman -- it's actually "Georgia" (appropriately enough!)
No, actually it's century Schoolbook for the passage reading "IN GOD WE TRUST" and the sans-serif in the scroll does not match what is on the real flag. CApitol3 (talk) 03:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of Torchwood novels and audio books

message: Please do not delete, if you can help can you create the template like New Series Adventures, the details of books will be added. {Ucebaggie (talk) 08:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is entirely unnecessary. Both audiobooks and novels have "lists" already present and any relevant information regarding their series can be added at the top of their pages. Their respective series aren't big enough to warrant their own page at this point in time. Perhaps given a few more years and subsequent releases, this page will be viable. Clockwork Apricot (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mahabat Khan

message: Descendents of Mahabat Khan
Mahabat Khan is one of the maternal ancestors of Jahan Mahmood the Birmingham (UK) based historian who is currently researching the role of Muslim soldiers in WWI and WWII. www.britainsmuslimsoldiers.co.uk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.98.214 (talk) 11:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It has been erroneously reported in this article that Mahabat Khan lies buried at Quila Qadam Shareef at New Delhi (Qutub Road, near Muslim cemetery of Khwaja Baaqi Billah.)
Mahabat Khan in his lifetime had ordered for and got built his own mausoleum adjacent to the west of the mausoleum of Shaikh Sharafuddeen Bu Ali Qalandar at Panipat also built by him. He had built on a renovational basis this mausoleum complex on the shrine of the 13th Century saint out of reverence, together with a grand enclosure comprising of a high gate, a mosque, a serai, and domes on the graves of the followers to the shrine (sajjada nasheens.)
A visit to Panipat at this shrine and reading of the Persian epigraphy on a red sandstone tablet under the dome of Mahabat Khans's mausoleum will establish my post here.Lutfullah (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Later life and death
Template talk:Infobox emblem

message: It appears to me that the British tradition of heraldry has been neglected in the distribution of this infobox, and some features of that tradition (such as arms having several different valid variants in current use, as with the Royal British arms) are not representable in this box. Lockesdonkey (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can just put the Scottish arms as the "middle" arms and use the same resolution as the English version.  -- I. Pankonin (t·c) 09:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a one-article solution, and anyway, there are FOUR acceptable variants (Standard Royal, Scottish Royal, UK Government, and old Scottish Executive). Lockesdonkey (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Continental emphasis 

message: Currently this template is used for both coats of arms following the European heraldic tradition, as well as other forms of emblems which can't be described as heraldic. The issue with this is that in many of the articles for the non-heraldic emblems the infoboxes have been filled with make-shift "blazons" for symbols never meant to be blazonable. For example Emblem of Djibouti has a user-made blazon based on the now-overwritten visual look of the Commons file. Other articles have this issue as well. These "blazons" are not only misleading, as readers lacking the knowledge on how heraldic blazons work might end up believing blazoning can be done for non-heraldic emblems, but also unhelpful because only readers who know the jargon used in English blazoning understand what the descriptions are meant to convey. 
While this issue could be solved by just removing the "blazons" in question from the articles, the template currently lacks any alternative option for descriptions of non-heraldic emblems. Further more the template has split the blazons into different categories, separating the crest and supporters etc., while in real grants of arms those are typically included in the blazon. There's also the issue of different European languages using different systems of blazoning. For example some Finnish coats of arms might be hard to properly blazon in English as the arms were created with the Finnish system of blazoning in mind. 
In my opinion the blazon options could be removed from the template altogether. While having the heraldic blazon easily at hand in the infobox has its perks, the blazons should probably instead be included in the article itself. This way the issue of improper blazoning of non-heraldic emblems could be avoided, as well as including the original non-English blazons and their translations for articles about coats of arms from non-English heraldic traditions. --Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue with non-heraldic emblems
Talk:Chris Leavins

message: I type cutewithchris in the search box but it didn't return me with this page. Can somebody kindly redirect or something?
: I've made both Cute With Chris and now Cutewithchris redirect to this page. Fatnickc (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting issues 

message: It is June 2008, and Master Chris has shared with the world his academic degree -- he has an MBA, Masters of Barf Animation. Impressive, so many talents... so few crew members helping with his web series. 199.214.26.82 (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  qualified as a barf animator too! 
Talk:Odeon Luxe Leicester Square

message: Something on the premiere of Goldfinger (1964)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TEL-Brough (talk • contribs) 20:13, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Always wondered whats inside the tower. Anyone know? 87.81.128.177 (talk) 11:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tower
Template talk:IIHF

message: This template is simply too clogged to be of any use.  I have been bold and reworked the template, with the main difference being the removal of the member nations section, since all the relevant info can be found at :List of members of the International Ice Hockey Federation –Schmloof  05:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but there is no harm in making such a large change, as per the bold, revert, discuss cycle. I outlined my reasons here on the talk page, and linked here in my edit summary in order to facilitate discussions.  Now that we've completed bold and revert, would you kindly discuss your reasons for the revert?  Again, I removed the member nations sections as they are simply lists, and can be summed up in the article I mentioned above. –Schmloof  00:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The inclusion of all the men's and women's senior and junior teams is and always was excessive and unnecessary. I agree with Salavat that separate nav templates for each category would be more appropriate. I made a nav temp that links to member associations back in March, Template:IIHF member associations. It's already transcluded on each association's respective page. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp
Template talk:802.11 network standards

message: See 
* OFDM system comparison table
* Spectral efficiency comparison table
I'm assuming the r^out and r^in are radii of transmission in and out?  Hence, transmitting out is harder since clients have less powerful trnasmitters than base stations?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.155.105 (talk) 04:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please contribute to other comparison tables

message: Link layer throughput and range distances are highly dependent on location, interference, and application.  Without reference to the testing conditions these numbers are meaningless, and just serve to spread misinformation to those assuming that Wikipedia is (always) a reliable source. Jpgs (talk) 00:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: in my opinion the ranges should be specified as theoretical and not approximate in a sense of what Jpgs is speaking of 66.189.173.57 (talk) 07:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations needed

message: I updated "Release date" column for 802.11ax/ay/ba/bb.
Those are based on the column "RevCom & Standards Board Final or Continuous Process Approval" found on OFFICIAL IEEE 802.11 WORKING GROUP PROJECT TIMELINES - 2020-11-30
Feelthhis (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release dates
Talk:Ordinance of no quarter to the Irish

message: The following conversation was copied from Talk:Irish Confederate Wars#The Rebellion - 1641-42
Googling for "Ordinance of No Quarter" returns two sources
*Pádraig Lenihan, "Confederate Catholics at War, 1641-49" Page 211 
*Thomas Bartlett, Keith Jeffery.  "A Military History of Ireland" page 305
Lenihan makes a mistake calling the English Parliament British (Scotland and England were separate at the time) but Lenihan also makes it clear that this Ordinance only applied to Irishmen in England not in Irishmen in Ireland  (note that the Irish did not have to be papist, Irish Royalist protestants who fought in Englandwould probably have fallen foul of this as well).
Bartlett and Jeffery make much the same point that it was a Parliamentary response to Charles I receiving forces from Ireland to fight his war in England. 10,00 troops from the Kilkenny Confederacy to England (and a further 2,000 to Scotland to aid Montrose). So to place the "Ordinance of no quarter to the Irish". So as the sentence containing the Ordinance was very misleading, I have removed it.  --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some Irishmen were in England -- I don't know how many but Thomas Bartlett, Keith Jeffery state 10,000 in the reference given above. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: There were obvious difficulties about the employment of Irish Catholic soldiers on mainland Britain; 10,000 troops  sent by the Kilkenny Confederacy to reinforce the royalists in England and Wales in 1643-4 excited intense antagonism, while undoubtedly contributing in a major way to the prolongation of Charles I's resistance to 1646.43
Don't think it could be much clearer!--Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: It would not surprise me that it was not correct, as there are few reported massacres of Catholic Irish soldiers in England and if there had been 10,000 running around one would have expected some serious fighting, and apart from a few hundred massacred after  one of the sieges (where the English garrison were allowed to leave with military honours) -- can't remember which one -- I can not  recall reading about any other incidents. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 22:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: genesis

message: The "Application" section has had "citation needed" templates on some of the text since April 2009. I suggest that those sentences are replaced with information from  page 206 in Barbara Donagan's War in England, 1642-1649. -- PBS (talk) 11:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Application section
Talk:Culinary Revolution

message: I think this is an important and interesting page; but I also think it needed another point of view, as well as a cross reference and sources.   I hope this makes the article more solid, as well as no longer an "orphan."Calitalia (talk) 10:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Counter-claim

message: The current title of this page is "Culinary revolution."   While that may often be the simple phrasing of it, I think it should be changed to "American Culinary Revolution."  This makes the article more specific to the actual topic.  There are in fact other so-called culinary revolutions in time and throughout the world, but I think this article should stay specific to the American Culinary Revolution, as it is a topic to itself at length, and should not be confused or run into others.--Calitalia (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose name change: American Culinary Revolution
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Pee Tern's discussion

message: Disambiguation 
Law Enforcement currently redirects to Police.  This is not correct.  There are many other law enforcement concepts and articles.
I suggest that Law Enforcement should go to a disambuguation page with, for example:
*Agency
**Law enforcement agency
***Police
*Powers
**Undercover
**Wire tap
*Law enforcement and society
*Law and Government
**Law
**Jurisdiction
Pee Tern (talk) 04:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See for example User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/lea dab Pee Tern (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Or a law enforcement article.  A disambiguation page is a good temporary solution.  The Transhumanist    00:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Law Enforcement]]

message: Can any one tell me how to use and utilise category intersections ?
Pee Tern (talk) 06:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is a "category intersection"?  The Transhumanist    00:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I now know that it is as follows:  . and, go to WP:EIW#Cat and scroll down a few lines to the "Intersection of two categories" subheading, which mentions CatScan and some related links, and for example Wikipedia:Category intersection. Pee Tern (talk) 00:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi Semantic Wiki

message: I would also like to suggest that there is a standard table to be uncluded in all LEA pages.  This will standardise information about the LEA, make it always avaialable in the same place and in the same format.  Populating this table would also allow a controlled way of putting LEA pages into standardised categories.
::What one learns!  The first attempt, now no good at all is gone for good.
::A much better one is in User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Law enforcement agency.  Comments please.
::Pee Tern (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For suggestions, see the template's talk page.  The Transhumanist    01:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Standardisation of Jurisdiction Attributes for All LEA Article Pages
Talk:Perschling

message: I remember someone saying in one of our discussions somewhere else that Austria doesn't use ß, so why is it in this article's name? And in any case, why in the world is this article hidden away with Weissenkirchen an der Perschling and Weissenkirchen and Weißenkirchen all redlinks? Gene Nygaard (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Willendorf an der Schneebergbahn

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 16:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 February 2021
Talk:Allende meteorite

message: The article says in one paragraph that the meteorite contains little or no Ni-Fe metal.  The next paragraph says it's 24% iron by weight.  I'm no chemistry expert, but i'm guessing one of those numbers is wrong.  That or it's non metalic iron (if that exists?)Eganjt (talk) 17:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Iron Composition
Talk:GTM Cars

message: "GTM Cars is a component kit car manufacturer located in Kingswinford, UK"
but
"In 2003 GTM Cars was bought by RDM Group, and in 2004 the company moved to Coventry."
Which is right? 81.159.58.45 (talk) 21:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which location?
Talk:Diletta Rizzo Marin

message: I am not sure this article meets the notability requirements of a wikipedia article.Nrswanson (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes this article was wrote by me as free pr, I apologize asking you to remove it.--Amianto999 (talk) 19:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nrswanson's  comment was made three years ago when the article looked like this. It has since been improved, re-written, and referenced, Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diletta Rizzo Marin where the discussion was Keep. Voceditenore (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article does not meet the notability requirements of wikipedia. Although Miss. Marin is undoubtedly talented she has not achieved anything significant within the field of opera that would warrant an article on her. She has won no major competitions or worked with any substantially important opera companies. This page is an attempt at free PR as opposed to a legitimate encyclopedia article.Nrswanson (talk) 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She's performing in Toulouse at the moment. I would have thought that was just about sufficiently notable. -- Kleinzach (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I visited her website  - For someone very young like her, she has an impressive repertoire. But can someone verify whether the list is true or not, other than that, the locations of the performance are as important as the “total number”. We also need to see her performance review (by expert of course). With all that info only we can determine whether she really fulfilled the criteria to be in here.  This is just my opinion. - Jay (talk) 06:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominating this article for deletion
Talk:Arzl im Pitztal

message: I've corrected this dates, but they will not be shown. Regards -- Drahdiwaberling (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRONG DATES OF POPULATION 

message: I've corrected this dates, but they will not be shown. Regards -- Drahdiwaberling (talk) 22:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WRONG DATES OF POPULATION