lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Palestinian Preventive Security

message: The article says "The Preventive Security Service (PPS) ..." Should that be (PSS) since those are the first letters of Preventive Security Service? There may be a good reason for the difference, but I wanted to be sure it wasn't a mistake. SchreiberBike talk 05:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPS or PSS
Talk:Tulkarm Governorate

message: Well, I just moved that long list of towns from Tulkarm to here..I´m not sure I did the right thing; i.e I am not sure about how accurate that list is. Huldra (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, the towns you added belonged to the Tulkarm District of British Mandate times. Its almost the same except several towns are now a part of the Qalqilya Governorate and the Jenin Governorate or were depopulated and currently in Israel. Consider however, starting a new article, Tulkarm District. --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mv list of towns from Tulkarm 

message: Shuweika is missing in the list of towns in tulkarm
http://www.palestineremembered.com/GeoPoints/Shuweika_1587/index.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.77.78 (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: At the moment it is just a redir to Tulkarm, but we are collecting sources on Talk:Tulkarm#3_villages, Huldra (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Town Shuweika, Tulkarm
Talk:WCRP

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a UNESCO program is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the World Climate Research Programme. - Dravecky (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Osgoode Hall

message: There are two courthouses on University Avenue within a block of each other, just north of Osgoode - one at 361 University at the southeast corner of University and Armoury St., and one at 393 University just north of Armoury St. - and there is also the Federal Court just south of Osgoode at 330 University, so perhaps it would be useful to change the "University Avenue Courthouse" reference in the penultimate paragraph to reflect more accurately which courthouse is connected to Osgoode via the tunnel.  (It connects to the courthouse at 361 University). {Jazz2006 00:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Abstract (sorry it had lost its date probably 1968) 
From an old newspaper cutting, Zena Cherry wrote 
	“York judge performs one wedding, participates in another”
Glenview Presbyterian Church the marriage of Lynda Martin (she had a twin Lisa) to Bradford C Heintzman
Lynda daughter of Judge Walter M Martin and granddaughter of the Hon. Walter Melville Martin of Regina . He retired in 1961 at the age of 84 as Chief Justice of Sakatchewan. In 1903 he graduated from Osgoode from 1908 to 1916 he was MP for Regina. Then when Sakatchewan’s Premier Walter Scott went insane Martin became Premier in 1916. From 1922 he was in the Court of Appeal; he became Chief Justice in 1941.
	Walter Martin also graduated from Osgoode. He was Canada’s number one ranking tennis player from 1933 to 35, on Canada’s Davis Cup Team 1930-35. He was Judge Advocate General for the RCAF Overseas. After that fracas he was senior counsel in the Attorney General’s Department. In 1967 he was appointed to the Bench as Senior County Judge County of York
My interest is in walter Martin my mother then Enid M Jarrett worked for him in London during World War 2. Even then he was still a keen tennis player as he played at lunchtimes on the courts in the grounds of Lincoln's Inn Fields
From Pat Saunders, Chichester West Sussex, England  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.194.221.231 (talk) 11:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judge Walter Martin
Talk:Halo Demo

message: I am hoping that this can stay, I think ti will be useful for the site.
However should I add a link to halo somewhere?
:You already have done, but its content might be better in the main article. That's why the merger was proposed. You'll have to show that the demo is important enough to deserve its own page, otherwise it will get merged. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 01:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/VanTucky

message: VanTucky's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 01:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Sorry people, 58.107.243.240 was my girlfriend being nice. VanTucky Talk 06:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bless. :) Tim Vickers 17:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess I was wrong, considering the comments this IP has made. My girlfriend certainly wouldn't make such a comment. VanTucky Talk 18:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP vote 

message: oppose Username is a slander against my home state. --W.marsh 00:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  offensive username
Talk:Karmen vortice

message: I wanted to start a page on Karmen vortices so people can add to it. I am in the process of writing a longer article for it, I just wanted to initiate the page.
Ebaben3 01:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a minor bit of information based on my impressions from google. Just enough to give the article some context. This seems to me to be good subject which needs massive expansion. Dsmdgold 01:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Littering behavior

message: There is already an article here, Litter, that this very small article might be better merged with. It's a related subject, there are a lot of overlaps and it seems to me that this doesn't deserve a separate article. It might be a good chance also to edit it properly and get rid of the original research and problems with lack of references.79.179.62.156 (talk) 06:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[litter]]

message: This article is either a copyright violation, or a conflict of interest with original research, which has been posted by an author. Bearian 01:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags

message: Despite the tags, I think this topic is notable. Bearian 01:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:The Perhapanauts

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Dietary treatments for multiple sclerosis

message: The title for this article makes it ripe for abuse by promoters of diets with dubious claims.  This issue is already covered in the Therapies for multiple sclerosis article under the Therapies for multiple sclerosis - Nutrition section. This article is more closely monitored by MS experts and less prone to abuse.  Furthermore, I created a new stub for Best Bet Diet (multiple sclerosis) as this seems to be a legitimate scientifically studied diet.  Both it and the Swank Multiple Sclerosis Diet are already addressed on that page.
I could find no information to support even a speculation that the ultra high fat Optimal Diet has any valid claims to effective treatment of MS and since none is cited here, that info clearly should be deleted. 
Overall, I believe the subject is best covered in the much more developed and monitored Therapies for multiple sclerosis page and suggest the this article be deleted. OccamzRazor 01:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I generally agree that this is a POV fork and hard to maintain, it's a spam/cruft magnet, and the material is probably better covered in therapies for multiple sclerosis. So I agree with the proposed deletion. MastCell Talk 03:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I precisely moved all this info from the article of therapies to this subarticle to clean the first one of dubious information. I have no problems in deleting it. I agree with deletion. Nevertheless maybe it should also be asked in the multiple sclerosis and therapies for multiple sclerosis talk pages to see what people think. Garrondo 09:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion
Talk:Eben Olemaun

message: I think the rest of the story of stella and Eben should be in here. from their return to Barrow to Eben going to Norway, and the vents of Eternal Damnation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.135.1.91 (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rest of the story
Talk:Bert W. O'Malley

message: The following:
::Dr. O’Malley’s laboratory has been a leader in uncovering the mode of action of the female sex steroids (progesterone and estrogen).
appears at http://cms.komen.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/komen_document/006159.pdf.  CM (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violoation
Talk:Dry lightning

message: Is dry lightning the same thing as heat lightning? It would seem to me they kind of share some things in common (both misnomers) but heat lightning refers to lightning without sound (and possibly rain) whereas dry lightning refers to lightning without rain, but maybe with sound?  Anyone? Since they are both misnomers perhaps it would be innacurate to say they are the same thing, but maybe linking the articles or combining them might not be a bad idea? MDuchek 01:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur.  They are entirely different.  A dry lightning storm can be directly above you, and you will certainly hear the thunder.  Heat lightning is essentially distant lightning, too distant for the sound to reach you.  And it's possible that wherever that distant storm is, plenty of rain is reaching the ground. Tmangray (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heat lightning

message: I have created an article: Dry thunderstorm. It should not be merged with this article because lightning can be produced by pyrocumulous clouds, which are NOT part of a thunderstorm. -- IRP (talk) 00:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dry thunderstorm]] 

message: I think calling it a technical misnomer is incorrect. It is a misnomer if you interpret dry lightning to mean that the lightning itself is dry, however that's far from the only interpretation of the expression, and in my view not even the most obvious one. It seems to me that the term is just used to signify lightning occurring when the surrounds are dry - as opposed to normal lightning which is commonly understood to occur near a lot of moistute (rain). The fact that the lightning itself isn't dry/wet doesn't really have anything to do with it. Similarly, it's not suggesting that the dry lightning is not associated with any moisture whatsoever - just not in close proximity when compared to normal lightning. 
To put it simply - you walk down the street, it is raining heavily and you see lightning - or you walk down the street, there is no rain and you see lightning. This is the main distinction between the two. Hence, the dry lightning is called dry because it is not associated with rain around it. Therefore it is not a misnomer, because the term dry clearly and accurately describes the significant observed difference, and it is not a misinterpretation of anything.
All the explanation we have for why dry lightning occurs and how there is often moisture higher up is great for the article, but it doesn't make the name a misnomer.
Anyone care to defend this? 
--124.171.223.158 (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misnomer
Category talk:Aesthetics literature

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... This category is consistent with the rest of the philosophy department I.e every branch of philosophy has a literature category totaling about 19 or 20 categories. So the discussion should be whether or not this whole "works" category is a replacement for or a container for "literature." The implications of this discussion affects those 19 or so categories. This category (aesthetics lit) was depopulated and then proposed for speedy deletion. That is not proper procedure. The proper way to move forward is to have the discussion about where what category those articles should be in. --Greg Bard (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:St. Teresa's Academy

message: Article appears to have leftover joke edits (12 students, 45 faculty, unknown accuracy with regards to the notable alumnae) and need cleanup with regards to tone. regards, --guyzero | talk 01:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: This article reads like a recruitment pamphlet.. somebody who knows something about this school needs to fix up the tone in order to make it more neutral.
Basser g (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and cleaned the article up. It could use some additional material put back in but in an encyclopedic tone, and well sourced.  I will remove the cleanup tag. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 19:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 
Talk:Brooklyn Papyrus

message: The two references link to the same URL. Someone goofed.
The link states that the Brooklyn Museum has over 300 papyri. I would have thought it necessary to identity the "Brooklyn Papyrus" by some kind of number to distinguish it from all the others. The length and condition of the papyrus should also be stated, with an estimate of the number of recipes and procedures. A link to a copy of the papyrus online would be nice (if it exists), or the ISBN of a book which contains the papyrus and a translation. (I am not an Egyptologist, so I can't help here.)
  Solo Owl   (talk) 13:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, nothing in the one source suggests there is such a thing as the Brooklyn papyrus.  But there are books that talk about it, so if someone gets ambitious they can fix.  Dicklyon (talk) 04:50, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major problems here 

message: This edit established the usage of the page as . Kindly maintain it consistently pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 08:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:ERA
Talk:Green week

message: C'mon!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.39.206.162 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT ABOUT NBC'S 'GREEN WEEK?' 

message: See Talk:Semik. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  See [[Talk:Semik]] 

message: Hello!  I will be making some edits to this page as part of a project for my Russian literature class.  I plan to rewrite the rusalki section and add some common traditions associated with Green Week. GreenwoodTree7 (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing for Russian class 

message: Hi, all. The initial summary of this article is in present tense while the rest is in past tense. I believe that is meant to reflect modern vs past ways of celebrating Green Week, but that is not made clear in the article. From a quick online search, it seems that this holiday is still being celebrated and birch trees are still significant, which means at least some of the content should be in present tense. Perhaps a better way of organizing the content would be "Modern observance," "Historical observance," "Association with rusalki," "Related observances." Happy to help, but wanted to check in before I began making major changes. Paridae5000 (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present vs past celebration
Talk:Yellow hypergiant

message: Shouldn't it be spectral type G, since it is a  yellow hypergiant.
* I thought so too, but there appear to be a number of scholarly journal articles that use the expression.—RJH (talk) 17:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a "gap" in the HR diagram known as the yellow void where relatively few stars are found between the red and blue supergiants.  Stars found in the gap are generally variable, from Cepheids up to Yellow Hypergiants.  There is a fairly clear upper temperature limit to the gap which is about 8,000K for hypergiants.  The lower temperature limit is set where stars cease to show variable temperatures, with cooler stars being red supergiants (occasionally red hypergiants).  The upper limit is approximately spectral class A2, hardly yellow but the upper temperature limit of the yellow hypergiants.  The term white hypergiant has been used occasionally, but doesn't seem to identify a particularly coherent set of stars, just some hotter yellow hypergiants that have not been seen to vary much in temperature, or possibly cool blue hypergiants or LBVs, again with no major variations having been observed.  The lower temperature limit of around 4,000K is approximately K5.  Yellow hypergiants have been observed at somewhat hotter and cooler temperatures, and it is to be expected from their extremely fast evolution that sooner or later one will be observed passing completely out of the yellow gap to become a red or blue hypergiant.  Lithopsian (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: G

message: Does this article really have anything to say that isn't said equally well elsewhere already?  Perhaps it should be saying something useful but isn't? Lithopsian (talk) 20:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usefullness?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Filthy Animals (comic)

message: I have to seriously question the validity of the vote by Agesthird, It appears that their account was only created a short time ago at 01:06, 8 November 2007. With no previous editing experience, It is my personal opinion and belief that it is inappropriate for this user to participate in any AfD votes or discussions until such time as they have shown they have more experience editing and navigating through Wikipedia Simon Bar Sinister 02:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote by [[User:Agesthird|Agesthird]]
Talk:Ray Sonin

message: The speedy deletion of this page is contested. The person placing this notice intends to dispute the speedy deletion of this article on its talk page, and requests that this page not be deleted in the meantime. Note that this request is not binding, and the page may still be deleted if the page unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if the promised explanation is not provided very soon. This template should not be removed from a page still marked with a speedy deletion template.
Ray Sonin was a Toronto Celebrity and hosted several very popular radio programs.
Wellfed 02:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joseph Ellis/Archive 1

message: I don't know what Ellis wrote about Jefferson and Hemings but this description seems pretty POV. At the very least, the details of whatever he wrote should be explained. MK 15:35, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't read that anywhere, but I'm sure if it's true, someone will eventually find a link. It would certainly surprise me: Ellis's "facts" appear to me to be mostly in agreement with other historians in the field. Ellis's gift (besides wonderful writing) is taking the "facts" and using them to try to asses the thinking process of his subject. Some may quibble with his interpretations, but I doubt there's much problem with his documentation. --Kevin Myers 13:09, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
I think "To his credit" should be removed.
"To his credit, Ellis acknowledged the mistake and issued a public apology"
Sirfith 18:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Homographic homophonic autantonym

message: Uhhhh is Dinosaur Comics really a reputable source to cite here? —69.66.243.153
It would be good as a reference "in popular culture". But the main problem is that "homographic homophonic" is entirely redundant; it amounts to "aut-" (meaning the self). And we already have a perfectly good article on autantonyms! —Toby Bartels 00:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Antietam order of battle: Confederate

message: I put back the "wing" designation, as the legislation creating Confederate Army corps was passed a day after this battle (which I could cite if needed) and implemented even later. I suppose "command" could be used as well—Lee used both often—but not "corps" at the time of this fight. The IP that changed it to "corps" offered this link as a cite & rationale. Any complaints with my decision? Kresock (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of 10 August '09
Talk:Henry Sy

message: "Sy's holding company, SM Investments Corp., has consistently been cited as one of the Philippines best-managed companies."
This article is replete with value judgments that are highly questionable. One could as well argue that it's well-managed because Mr. Sy is adept at exploiting workers and by crushing attempts at unionization of the labor force.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by FixMacs (talk • contribs) 04:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda 
Talk:Pamban Island

message: It is somewhat silly to say the island is 30 km wide  and 2 km long.  Maybe in German they say this.   In English language it should be 30 km long  and 2 km wide.
Eregli bob 02:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions 

message: Could it possibly be true that "Most of Pamban Island lies below sea-level"?  This is so unlikely it needs a citation. 67.169.119.122 (talk) 04:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Below sea level"?
Template talk:WWE personnel

message: A-Town Down under now has their own Wikipedia page. Please put it under SmackDown's tag team division. 74.88.118.72 (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Kline • talk to me! • contribs 21:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024 

message: Nakamura and The L.W.O. have switched brands. 74.88.118.72 (talk) 01:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears to have already been done. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 

message: https://twitter.com/WWE/status/1785172957196636646
Read and move everyone to where they are now. 74.88.118.72 (talk) 05:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not specific enough to be actionable - reading the tweet and making specific requests (if they haven't already been done) is your job. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 (2) 

message: Now that the 2024 draft is finished, move everyone to where they are now. 74.88.118.72 (talk) 12:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Duplicate request. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 (3) 

message: Move Sheamus to Raw. 74.88.118.72 (talk) 15:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 22:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 (4)