lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Open golf tournament

message: I am curious: Is there a reason that this page about "open golf tournaments" has to be about national opens? I was adding some wikilinks on here to Wikipedia pages about several open golf tournaments. It took some research to find those pages. Almost immediately after I made the last change, I noticed that in the revision history, somebody had eliminated links I had posted earlier (with the comment "national opens only"). After seeing that, I "undid" my change, putting it back to how that other person left it. I could understand there being a separate article devoted to national open golf tournaments, but the title of this article sounds like it is in regards to open tournaments in general. I may be missing something, so I would appreciate some enlightenment. Is there a better article for me to post those wikilinks? Thank you. InforManiac (talk) 18:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't. It would serve no purpose. wjematherbigissue 06:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please delete the template that I had created prior to your above message (since you nominated the template for deletion). I am not authorized to delete it. Such a template would serve a purpose, but only for people like me, who are fans of the history of golf and the world of golf. I only wish somebody would have answered my previous question before I went through the trouble of getting those links together again (because I waited almost two months for an answer). I was trying to respect the wishes of Tewapack by leaving the page's format as he had it. Open tournaments are not just national tournaments, but whatever. I just wanted to put a template at the bottom of the screen, so that it would be out of the way, but if somebody wanted a list to the Wikipedia pages about "open" golf tournaments from around the world (both past and present), all they would have to do is click the "expand" link. Such a template serves absolutely no purpose to the casual golf fan, but it offers a lot to somebody who wants to do some serious research. Please feel free to delete the template if you want to. You'll get no arguments from me about it. It only took about half a minute for me to research all those wikileaks. InforManiac (talk) 04:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why only "national" open tournaments? Why not "all" opens? 

message: Why are only two (and two relatively minor) open tournaments for women listed here?  If any are to be listed, shouldn't the most important ones by far, the Brtish Women's Open and the U.S. Women's Open, be included?  Conversely, should there be a separate article devoted to women's open golf tournaments? 2600:1004:B15D:B6F9:6C13:AFB:27C:5CE6 (talk) 22:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent treatment of Women's Opens
Talk:Alex Hay

message: I have added some details on Alex Hay's passing. Since this has only been recently reported, I will try to add more detail when more available sources have been presented. Regards, --Auger Martel (talk) 22:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Roslyn, New York

message: In regards to the "Politics" section, it is unclear where the data that Roslyn leans strongly Democratic is from. Also, the following sentence about the Obama/McCain election doesn't seem to be a necessary detail as it pertains to this article and Roslyn specifically. Jblaniad (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soc314: Wikipedia Critique an Article Assignment 

message: I have removed the climate table with data from Mineola, Climate table removed, as Roslyn and Mineola are two separate villages (which are not even located next to each other – although they are only a few miles apart they are not the same). That said, please feel free to add in a table for the data specifically for the Incorporated Village of Roslyn – but please make sure that the data is for this village and only this village.It would be awesome to have such a table on this page! Thanks! AITFFan1 (talk) 20:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate data table
Talk:Tennikoit

message: The sections describing the game and its various rules and such should be rearranged, reformatted, or possibly completely rewritten by someone with knowledge of the game. Someone who chanced upon the article would have no idea of the kind of game was being discussed until too far down the page. Also, second person is not really appropriate in this context, and thus the article lacks an encyclopedic tone. Dictator57 (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup 2008

message: Is this the same game as that know as tenniquoit and ringtennis or are they slightly different? --Traveler100 (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same game or different 

message: Voice 103.68.9.238 (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennikoit
Talk:Firestone Country Club

message: These could not have been played on three courses.  Back in 1974, Firestone only had the North and South courses.  West course was not in existence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.247.15.225 (talk) 08:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ref simply say 3 events (not mentioning course), I have rewritten the section. Nigej (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Championships in 1974
File talk:First century palestine.gif

message: A bit of googling turns up maps which look quite different from this.
Even today countries produce maps showing vast territorial claims.
Do your "sources" say where their info comes from?
i.e., is it someone's imagination of lands described in bible stories?
Or peer-reviewed publications by real historians?
Its a JUDEAN map - Not a Palestine map!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.161.189.132 (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The map looks good to me, I have compared it. The Palestine vs Judea issue is mostly political, not geographical - so let that be as it may. History2007 (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Park Hyatt Resort Aviara

message: As of June 2010 this will no longer be a Four Seasons.  Recommend deletion as an entirely new entry will be required once it is under new ownership. JennySV (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of Hotel 

message: Needs reliable sources and evidence of notability. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability / Reliable Sources
Talk:Four Seasons Resort Hualalai

message: No supported assertions of notability, no reliable source referencing at all. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true, and your attempt to delete all the hotels in one fell swoop in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta was withdrawn on 26 August, a day before you questioned the notability, so this seems like a backdoor attempt to go around the withdrawn AfD. Viriditas (talk) 02:54, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

text: I would agree that the area is undoubtedly notable but that the hotel complex is not. I would suggest an article on the area with passing mentions of the hotels and golf course as you suggest. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 02:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Article restored. Viriditas (talk) 02:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability / Reliable Sources
Talk:Four Seasons Resort Lanai

message: No assertions of notability, no reliable sources, 2 dead links. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability / Reliable Sources 
Talk:Ballantine's Championship

message: The current title "The Championship at Laguna National" is suboptimal, given that the tournament was only played at Laguna National once. "Ballantine's Championship" would also be bad because Ballantine's didn't sponsor the tournament every year. Would something like "The Championship (golf)" be appropriate? pʰeːnuːmuː →‎ pʰiːnyːmyː → ‎ɸinimi → ‎fiɲimi 20:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: My first thought was that "The Championship (golf)" is an odd name, but http://www.europeantour.com/europeantour/season=2014/tournamentid=2014034/news/newsid=220440.html does use that name. Some folk are not keen on articles starting "The", so that may be an issue, too. Nigej (talk) 21:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Two other options come to mind: 1) Split into 2 - Ballantines (Korea Tour) and the final event (Aisian Tour). 2) Call it Ballantine's Championship since that is the name it had most of the time. For older events this is not unknown. Nigej (talk) 06:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah I would go along with two separate articles. If the tournament name and location has changed (and no doubt the trophy), it's not the same trophy. Note that the main Singapore newspaper describes the tournament "replacing" the Ballantine's rather than a continuation of it. https://www.straitstimes.com/sport/golf/golf-laguna-national-to-host-spores-1st-marquee-mens-event-in-18-months--Jopal22 (talk) 09:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  the main point against is that the European Tour regard it as one http://www.europeantour.com/europeantour/season=2014/tournamentid=2014034/history/index.html although clearly the other two tours wouldn't. Nigej (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Mm, I was going to say that is just the ET being lazy, and because it had the same organisers and "With the Championship aiming to return to Korea in2015, the event continues to feature both Korean players and to be extensively broadcast in Korea."(http://www.europeantour.com/europeantour/season=2014/tournamentid=2014034/news/newsid=220440.html) So I suppose it does feel like one tournament --Jopal22 (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name ideas
Talk:Belhus, Essex

message: http://lh.matthewbeckett.com/houses/lh_essex_belhus_info_gallery.html I'm pretty sure they pre-date the magic 1924 copyright date. --98.246.156.76 (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos, if anyone is curious 

message: that (like the lastname: Bellhouse) the meaning is from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_House and NOT from belle/beautiful house.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:226:8FF:FEDC:FD74 (talk) 14:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Reaney (Placenames of Essex) says the name derives from the family. I have added this. If you have another source that says something different, please quote it. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology given for Belhus needs to be clearer... 
Talk:Belvedere Club

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:George Wright Golf Course

message: This extraordinary course was my first introduction to golf.  We lived on the large sand hill to the northeast of the George Wright, and used to sneak onto the course as kids to avoid paying the $4 or so greens fees.
The clubhouse is absolutely not to be believed, the closest thing to a Norman Castle I have seen in North America.
--Steve (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

message: The golf course is equally split between Hyde Park and Roslindale, in that holes 1-9 lie in Roslindale and 10-18 are in Hyde Park. The line between the neighborhoods is where Poplar Street becomes West Street.  More evidence of this is inside the course itself, where an old boundary stone marks the border of West Roxbury (which then included Roslindale) and Hyde Park, at the time towns independent of Boston.
The thing to remember about Zip Codes is that they are simply a tool of the USPS to assist them in delivering the mail more efficiently, and do not mark or always correspond to city, town (or in this case) neighborhood borders. In many cases Zip Codes even cross state lines. The USPS spells all of this out on their website.
The Boston Redevelopment Authority (or whatever their current name is) and realtors also publish maps which change over time depending on what the current agenda happens to be. Unfortunately places like Google Maps gets much of its information from these unofficial sources! Carfare (talk) 02:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyde Park/Roslindale and Zip Codes
Talk:Kingston Heath Golf Club

message: Kingston Heath part hosted the 2022 Australian Open where Adrian Meronk, Ashleigh Buhai and Kipp Popert all won their respective tour events. Grace Kim shot a course record 66 (-7) to my understanding in round 1.
Also hosting 2028 Presidents Cup 2A02:C7E:396C:F500:ED92:1F0F:FC02:C2E5 (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISPS Handa Australian Open 2022
Talk:Pender Island Invitational

message: I think all this info is for another tournament elsewhere. I've played disc golf in BC and on Pender Island for years now, and I don't recognize a single name here.
The Pender Island Invitational is an amateur tournament .  None of the competitors have competed in BC tournaments and none of the competitors live on the island.  They travel from various parts of Canada and the USA and rent a house on the island for the 4 day event.  
I see. I was confusing this event with the Pender Island Classic (or "Pender Bender") held on the May long weekend annually.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr van Nostrand II (talk • contribs) 18:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Playoff (golf)

message: The section on the 18-hole playoff states:
"The U.S. Open is the only tournament that still uses this version. . . . The U.S. Women's Open also uses this format."
Um, isn't the U.S. Women's Open a tournament?  If it uses this format, then it is false that "The U.S. Open is the only tournament that still uses this version."Daqu (talk) 01:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: I've flagged this article with multiple issues for the following reasons--
* It's generally lacking in references.
* The references included need to be checked, as well as factual accuracy, as the article doesn't appear to have been updated for content this year.
* It contains a number of weasel words, particularly in the introduction.
This is far from my specialist subject but when I'm home and logged in, I'll help out where I can. Any assistance would be very much appreciated! :) 81.141.76.52 (talk) 08:34, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues 
Talk:Sag Harbor, New York

message: The 03:30, 4 December 2013‎ 2602:306:36ed:42c0:a4ce:48fb:2fb3:a2cb version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 
Talk:Bridgestone Golf

message: Needs to be generalized to discuss Bridgestone Golf globally, not just North America. Section within Bridgestone article also needs work. bigissue (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately most of what you added was either non-encyclopaedic or purely promotional and I have had to remove it. wjematherbigissue 17:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Reverted again – same problems. wjematherbigissue 17:05, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

text: Please just read through the basic policies and guidelines as linked in the welcome message I posted on your talk page. Pay particlular attention to WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NPOV. The company website and press releases by the company are not good sources for neutral information. wjematherbigissue 20:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Greater Hickory Kia Classic at Rock Barn

message: This article has been a stub since it's creation ,it contains no WP:IRS, only self published/primary sources which raises questions about it passing WP:GNG. Even with proper sourcing the page as is is not sufficient to have it's own article,the information should be listed on the Champions Tour pageNewmanoconnor (talk) 13:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The suggested merge makes no sense. Every Champions Tour event, current (25) and past (67), has its own page. Otherwise the Champions Tour article would be ridiculously long. As the Champions Tour is the preeminent senior golf tour, its events are presumed notable. These events receive wide coverage, secondary sources can be easily added. - Tewapack (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I do have to admit, your point that every champions tour event has it's own article raises questions,I'm going to have to do some more investigating, but most of the articles I looked at don't meet WP:RS or WP:IRS and appear to fails WP:GNG. I'll need to look at the golf essays to see what criteria are laid out. At minimum these articles are poorly sourced,or not sourced. Do not seem to demonstrate WP:CONTINUINGCOVERAGE, but are WP:ROUTINE. This could be a huge project..wow.Newmanoconnor (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're way off base here. These events certainly meet WP:GNG, the winners of these events are specifically noted at WP:NGOLF. How could the winners be notable for winning the event if the event is not notable? Also look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Golf#To-Do list, #3. Any further discussion should be at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Golf. Tewapack (talk) 22:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The same way that football players are notable but games, even the afc championship is not notable.WP:NGOLF is about gofers, not events. This would be covered by WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT. Even if this event was notable it isn't sourced properly and hasn't been since you created it. It's just a bunch of stats, and a stub of a paragraph that is hardly prose. However, I think a merge to. "Regular Events" page is more appropriate than my original proposal. gosh, it has me wondering if all of golf has been allowed to become a walled garden...I think I have a lot of stuff to look at. I'm not sure I have the time to help correct this right now, I'd also like to mention it to a few uninvolved admins and editors to get outside opinions.I thin if you want to remove the merge tag, I have no issue with that now, considering the amount of work any one change will start. Actially I'll remove it.Newmanoconnor (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion
Talk:Professional Putters Association

message: "The Putt-Putt Golf Courses Championship TV series has become the longest running syndicated sports program in television history."
That seems pretty doubtful. Anyone have some Proof? Railsofsteel (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I could not find any reliable secondary sources to support this, so I have removed it. Dobblestein 🎲 🎲 talk 17:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syndication?
Talk:Chandigarh Golf Club

message: Note:  Project Banner with Chandigarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chandigarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Chandigarh workgroup Addition
Talk:Hawkstone Park

message: It would be appreciated if it could be made clear whether or not Hawkstone Hill, home of the Hawkstone Park Motocross Circuit, is part of the estate - what is the hill called the follies are on? I have read that first time visitors to the famous (although it seems now defunct) Hawkstone Park motocross circuit have followed permanent signs by mistake to arrive at the Follies!Cloptonson (talk) 08:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Hawkstone Hill part of this estate?
Talk:Maidstone Club

message: Please edit this page, as the William H. Tucker that is listed as the designer is the wrong William H. Tucker. The William H. Tucker who designed this course is my great great grandfather and I would be happy to give information that can be verified. William H. Tucker has designed over 100 courses in the USA and this is the wrong William H. Tucker who is not even old enough to be the one and the same. Some info can be found by visiting http://trenhamgolfhistory.org/Leaders18951915.html or googling William Henry Tucker golf, or Willie Tucker golf, he had a son who was a Jr. who always designed courses. They have a golf invitational named after my great great grandfather at the University of New Mexico.Justinrohrbach (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: S Philbrick(Talk) 21:27, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong William H. Tucker 

message: There's no such thing in the state of New York. They may control access to a portion of the beach but anyone can enter via public roads to either side and walk along the sand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.2.137 (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Private Beach"
Talk:Royal Liverpool Golf Club

message: The article is written in prose more commonly found in a course guidebook. It's far to presumptive and does not contain any references. A lot of the weasel words need to be removed as well.86.169.4.0 (talk) 23:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: It seems that Location has to have been changed a few times on this article. 'Liverpool City Region' is an unofficial political terms for the use of the local combined authority. It is not a recognised geographical area. The course is in Hoylake which is on the Wirral Penninsula in the county of Merseyside. You wouldn't address post to the 'Liverpool City Area', you wouldn't use it as a location. 90.194.233.74 (talk) 20:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: The numbers relating to par are not correct 106.70.0.20 (talk) 23:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics
Talk:Royal Trophy

message: Following a complaint to the Wikimedia Foundation, some of the unsourced or inaccurate material in this article has been removed or altered. Still remaining is the following claim, which has been marked "dubious": "The Royal Trophy is one of several new team golf tournaments between teams from rival regions of the world started since the 1990s, inspired by the popularity of the Ryder Cup." According to the correspondent, this is untrue, and The Royal Trophy is the only golf tournament of its kind. As this is not a simple matter to verify, I am noting the dispute and will invite contributors from the Wikiproject to help determine the statement's accuracy. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As can be seen from the article's recent history, there is an editor who clearly sees Wikipedia as just another advertising platform. Anyway, as I recall even the organisers credited the Ryder Cup with being the catalyst for the events foundation in their press releases. Ref now added, and many others could easily be found, I'm sure. wjematherbigissue 18:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious
Talk:Schuylerville, New York

message: This village has incorrect coordinates that point to a location in Washington County. This village is actually in Saratoga County. NewYorkeruser (talk) 03:44, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate Location 

message: The History section is weird. "Inhabited as late as 820 a.d..." What's the source for that? And it implies that the land was uninhabited in 1691 when Schuylers arrived. 
It was settled by Dutch which means there is a land patent. Is Schuylerville in the Saratoga Patent?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadalex (talk • contribs) 10:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saratoga Patent