lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Broadway Bridge (Manhattan)

message: I was stuck on a number one train for 20 minutes because this bridge was opened on 6/25/14 and missed my connection to the MetroNorth train at the Marble Hill Station on the north bank of the Harlem River.  This made me curious.  Please add the following information: a) a photo of the bridge in the open position; b) a discussion of the circumstances under which the bridge is opened, potentially delaying thousands of subway riders — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 25 June 2014‎ (UTC)
:As far as I know the bridge is lifted whenever the authorities are notified that there will be water traffic which cannot pass under the bridge.  Since this does not happen on a regular schedule, getting a picture of the bridge in open position would mean either staking it out, or just being in the right place at the right time - so I wouldn't hold my breath about us getting one for the article. BMK (talk) 04:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: requesting more info about opening the bridge
Talk:USS Patrick Henry

message: My Dad, Cmdr. F.J. Moran, Jr. USN, worked as the managing engineering officer at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard from 1975-1978 (when he retired), and the Patrick Henry was one of the projects he oversaw.  She was there for overhaul and refueling during that time.  But as I was only a kid, I hardly know any of the details.  Got to tour the boat, though; one of the highlights of my childhood.  Seriously.  Dougom (talk) 04:33, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mare Island refit 

message: Under 1. History, 1.1 Commissioned, second paragraph, last sentence, it says "Patrick Henry was the first ballistic missile submarine to enter Holy Loch, and the first to go alongside the submarine tender USS Proteus for replenishment and routine repair." According to the USS Proteus Wiki, 1. Service History, 1.2 1960–1992, first paragraph, first sentence, it says "Proteus recommissioned 8 July 1960, and after shakedown at Guantanamo Bay, she accomplished her first SSBN refit 20 January–21 February at New London."
Clearly, both of these can't be true.
I suggest that the Patrick Henry sentence end at the comma, and the remaining text be removed. TCav (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting info
Talk:USS George Washington (SSBN-598)

message: I understand there are rumors that the Soviets acquired secret details of the design of the "George Washington" and used them as the basis for some of their own submarine designs. Was this ever substantiated? Drutt (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All you need to do is to look at the photos of the Soviet "Yankee"-class submarines of a very similar design, including the 16 missile tubes.47.215.180.7 (talk) 04:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Royal Navy's five Polaris submarines were allowed to have a very similar design, but they were made in the U.K., and they had British nuclear reactors. Furthermore, they had Polaris missiles made by Lockheed, but hydrogen warheads made in the U.K.47.215.180.7 (talk) 04:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The French Navy has used an independent design with 15 missiles, with seven on one side, and eight on the other, and staggered, to make the beam of the ship narrower.04:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Royal Navy's four Trident submarines have 16 missiles apiece, instead of the 24 missiles of the American ones.47.215.180.7 (talk) 04:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Espionage

message: Test launch of Polaris missile with a live nuclear warhead.
Someone really needs to include information about this test firing. Back in 1961 or '62, the "George Washington" test fired an armed Polaris missile in the South Pacific. Its target was the British-owned Christmas Atoll on which both the British and the Americans carried out nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere (just like at Bikini Atoll). The Polaris missile carried a nuclear warhead that was detonated in an airburst, but that warhead was less powerful that the usual H-bomb on a Polaris A-1 missile. The test explosion had a yield of less than 10 kilotons, and it might not have been thermonuclear.47.215.180.7 (talk) 04:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test launch of Polaris missile with a live nuclear warhead.  

message: There were two publications specific to the Georgefish (and probably for every boat). They had a unique format. As I recall, the size may have been 3" x 9" x 2"? One provided a graphic and functional description of the submarine's electrical system. Its short name was the "Electrical Tab". The other pub, called "The Piping Tab", illustrated the boat's hydraulic systems. I think that included potable, sanitary, and ballast water; breathable, pressurized and ballast air and oil hydraulics.
These were the "Bibles" that informed and guided ship's crew for system and ship qualification, and system troubleshooting.
Just month's before decommissioning, fifty or more newly printed Piping Tabs appeared dumped on an officer's stateroom bunk. I'm sure most sailors passed that open door, as I did, knowing the boat's future, and shrugging at the waste. 
But I sorely wish I had snagged one of those now. 1st cheezewiz (talk) 04:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piping Tabs
Talk:George Washington-class submarine

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:USS Abraham Lincoln (SSBN-602)

message: I thought Portsmith Naval Shipyard was in Portsmith, NH. What is the connection with Kittery, Me?
63.100.172.20 (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  question 

message: I have removed the following text from the article where it doesn't belong. This text was added 2011 May 07 by User:173.61.104.75.
:It's odd how this time interval is missing when in fact this was the same time there was a hurricane that headed for Guam I forget if it was Agnes or what the name was.  It prompted the 602 to head toward Peal Harbor and the Abraham Lincoln 602 almost sank.  While underway with the Gold crew heading toward Pearl Harbor from Guam in 1978 aprox. August, they wanted to snorkel.  An order given out by the then OOD a LTJG who gave the order to approach snorkel depth but we were not at snorkel depth (aprox 86ft) we were at 287ft and took on sea water through the diesel.  So since we had no diesel engine and the water started coming into the engine room it started to affect the after trim (the level)of the ship and it went from 68 to a depth I cannot write in about 60 seconds in reverse.  The pressure on the rear main seal was so intense water came in through that seal into the lower level engine room and shorted out two of the three high packs. (high pressure air compressors).  If it were not for the Commander coming to the bridge when he did we could have swam with the fishes for real. That was her 50th or 51st patrol.
-- Trappist the monk (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History for 1978-1979 needed
Talk:Ba'kelalan Airport

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as: N3.99164 E115.62501
*
(Above comment posted 2008-12-23T03:22:27.)
Done. BrainMarble (talk) 01:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:USS Ulysses S. Grant

message: I would like to bring your attention to the class of submarine that you have the Grant listed under, I was stationed on the Grant in the 90's just before decommissioning, the SSBN-631 was not a Madison class sub it is a LAFAYETTE class submarine and the 14th to be commissioned to that class please correct amend this! sources, http://navysite.de/ssbn/ssbn631.htm http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/08631.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowboy124aa (talk • contribs) 10:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class
Talk:USS Von Steuben (SSBN-632)

message: Is Von Steuben a James Madison class or Lafayette class submarine becuase there are conflicting sources? It seems like Lafayette but on the disambiguation & James Madison class page it says James Madison. I'll delete them unless someone says otherwise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefudgeone (talk • contribs) 13:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Original research is not a reliable source which is what is required in this instance. -MBK004 04:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 

message: I believe the error is because the URL has an equal (=) sign in it. 
Below is the full url:
http://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1322&context=law-faculty-publications
I would appreciate any help in correcting this error.
For now, I have shortened the URL in the Page Reference to only http://scholarship.richmond.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legohead1 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 20 May 2016‎
:Sign your posts on talk pages.
:The error referred to by ReferenceBot was caused by the omission of the URL parameter name.  You 'fixed' that when you used the shorter url.  The full length url posted in this message work correctly:
::
:::
:It is best practice to include as much information in a citation as possible.  I have added the author and date information here.
:—Trappist the monk (talk) 11:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Help me correct the error

message: The article now states "She conducted an Extended Refit Period at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard between March 1978 and May 1978.".  The ERP was conducted BY personnel from Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, but the ERP was conducted in Holy Loch, Scotland.  The purpose of the ERP program was to extend time between overhauls by performing as much extensive maintenance as possible while deployed.  The Von Steuben was in the Floating Dry-dock, Alamogordo, in Holy Lock during the bulk of this refit.
I was there.
50.81.208.250 (talk) 19:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1978 ERP location error
Talk:Diatto Ottovù Zagato

message: Article was created with a press release title.  Creator has removed Speedy Delete tag twice and blanked article inbetween edits. Ronbo76 05:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After apologizing for removing the speedy deletion tags twice, the creator removed it yet again.  Maybe s/he feels that the problems in the article have been addressed, but I don't see how, after the messages left here and on their talk page, the message could have been any clearer.  janejellyroll 07:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: For future reference, please don't remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created.  If the speedy deletion is unjustified, then an administrator will remove it when they review the page. janejellyroll 06:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Really?  Your edit history indicates that you've been editing since November of 2005.  janejellyroll 06:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diatto_Ottov%C3%B9_Zagato&diff=109751287&oldid=109751201 initial diff]
Talk:Maya Ford

message: See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_February_15#Allison_Robertson_et._al. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Them (2006 film)

message: I note that this film has been categorised as a 'supernatural horror film'. I have no idea why,after watching the film, it should be classified as such, since there are no signs of elements typical of supernatural horror present in the film. Perhaps one could cite murderous children as such an element, but that does not seem much: therefore I am taking off the category.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie M Hayes (talk • contribs) 16:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supernatural? 

message: Perhaps the link to the director's name should be amended, as it currently leads to an X-Men villain.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asat (talk • contribs) 18:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not that David Moreau
Talk:Brett Anderson (American musician)

message: See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_February_15#Allison_Robertson_et._al. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Afd

message: Please source this trivia and re-add to the article. Thanks, Chaz Beckett 16:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please source this trivia 
Talk:Anna of Austria, Queen of Spain

message: Can she be considered Queen of Portugal?  I mean her husband only officially became king of Portugal in 25 March 1581, although he had send the Duke of Alba to claim the throne for him in November 1580, but by then Anne had died a month prior.  --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 09:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how this article had her as Queen consort of Portugal when she was already in her grave when Philip's reign began in March 1581. She was Queen consort of Spain. I have since removed the incorrect information naming her as a Portuguese consort.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:38, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen of Portugal 
Talk:Elisabeth Farnese

message: Could anyone please tell me which source says that her full name was Elisabeth Maria? All the books I have read so far refer to her just as Elisabeth/Isabel (without Maria). And which source says that she was born in the Palazzo della Pillotta? DanyMountbatten (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A simple Google Book Search would provide answers. For the first question, see the results for:
*Elisabeth Maria Farnese
*Elisabetta Maria Farnese
*Elizabeth Maria of Parma
Seeing that most of the sources which refer to her as Elisabeth Maria are two centuries old and that other Wikipedias call her simply Elisabeth, I would not oppose removing Maria. Surtsicna (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you; besides, the sources which refer to her as Elisabeth Maria are few. Therefore I will remove Maria. DanyMountbatten (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Elisabeth Maria?
Talk:Elisabeth of Valois

message: This a mess - mainly about Isabella rather than her mother.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.11.147 (talk) 22:53, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Élisabeth is her first name in French, the translation of which in English is Elizabeth.  
Removing the accent aigu to have her as Elisabeth is tantamount to renaming her with a half French/half English name.  
The opinion of readers other than Surtsinca & myself is needed in order to have a consensus on the matter, i.e. which first name to choose throughout the article.   
Regards,  Frania W. (talk) 00:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to make the matters clear: you don't want Elisabeth to be a compromise between Élisabeth and Elizabeth, right? If that's so, I'll advocate moving the article to Elizabeth of Valois. Surtsicna (talk) 11:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Élisabeth/Elisabeth/Elizabeth
Talk:Maria Luisa of Parma

message: Is anyone not discouraged by the fact that almost everything about Maria Luisa of Parma, is cited verbatim?  The wording in almost every source I googled is exact, even in Italian (which is the only other language I can read.)  There has got to be more information on this Queen. --Roseba (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How do you know that Maria Luisa was her mother's favourite kid, I always thought that Maria Isabella (her elder sister) was her favourite child. --Daaviiid (talk) 21:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  favourite child 
Talk:Maria Luisa Gabriella of Savoy

message: I reverted the edit of  as an unsourced change (by a user who had changed several birthdates in wikipedia, always unsourced, and sometimes contradicting well-known sources), and changed "September" back to "November".    But now I am not so sure... I cannot find her birthdate in Encyclopedia Britannia, and the various wikipedias do not agree: 
* Catalan: Sept 17
* Estonian: Nov 17
* Spanish: Sep 17
* French: Sep 17
* German: Nov 17
* Italian: Nov 17
* Polish: Nov 17
* Japanese: Nov 17
So when was she really born?  Somebody must have a book... --The very model of a minor general 15:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had noticed that change, but did not revert it precisely because of this confusion. Frankly, I do have a paper encyclopaedia, but it does mention her. We need a book about the House of Savoy, and I don't own one.  --Nehwyn 16:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  birthdate 

message: Since when are encyclopaedic articles designed after Page Six? Stevenmitchell (talk) 06:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Six?
Talk:List of Spanish royal consorts

message: Francis I of Spain was not royal consort. Husband of Spanish Queen regnant is co-monarch (Ferdinand II of Aragon was Ferdinand V of Castile and husband of Joanna the Mad was Philip I). Please, correct me if I am wrong. 87.250.113.209 (talk) 11:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Swordfish (SS-193)

message: The last two paragraphs of the article are a complete duplication of the rest of the article.  Any particular reason why?  Just hasn't been tidied up yet after a rewrite? CraigWyllie 12:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: duplication

message: Do we really have to linkify every single day of the year?  
It's horribly annoying and hides all the other links in a mountain of pointless links.  (I could understand if we were linking to a specific date, so you could see what else happened on that day of that year, but everything that ever happened on September 9 or December 11??  Why not randomly split all historical events up into 100 and number the pages 1-100?  The real problem is that in an an article like this where every single sentence has a date in it, and now we've got 100 pointless links all over the place.  
You know what WOULD make sense?  A single link the first time a given month of a given year is named - that link being to a page whose contents are all the other important things that happened that month of that year in this particular field or particular sequence of events - aka World War 2.  (I'm going to regret suggesting this.)  
CraigWyllie 12:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: every single date a link

message: The early Sargo-class submarines had composite diesel-electric and diesel-hydraulic propulsion, while the later ones were all diesel-electric.  K. Jack Bauer's Register of Ships of the U.S. Navy states that SS-194 through SS-197 were full diesel-electric, but Norman Friedman's U.S. Submarines Through 1945 states that SS-193 was the first full diesel-electric Sargo.  I've left the propulsion ambiguous in the infobox of this article, but if anyone figures it out, please update the infobox to match either the early or the late Sargos. TomTheHand (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Swordfish'''s propulsion
Talk:María Cayetana de Silva, 13th Duchess of Alba

message: MichaelKohlhase 13:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Triton (SS-201)

message: Boat's WWII history would be a lot easier to follow if dates included years - like "Triton made a training cruise to Midway from 30 August to 15 September...."
would be more helpful as "Triton made a training cruise to Midway from 30 August to 15 September, 1941..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.90.64 (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Years

message: The rumors that Triton was sunk by friendly fire are noted in this article. These are based on what appear to be self-published sources, which are usually unacceptable at Wikipedia Self-published sources. Please chime in if you disagree. Otherwise I'll delete this material. For archival purposes: here are the questionable sources:
*
*
Easchiff (talk) 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Moved these sources to "External links". Deleted these speculations from the article's body. Easchiff (talk) 12:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Material based on self-published sources
Talk:Catalina Micaela of Spain

message: She should be named Archduchess Catherine Michelle of Austria surely?! =\ Prince LouisPhilippeCharles (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: There is a controversy surrounding :File:Catalinamicaelaspain65.jpg regarding both the painter and, by extension, the subject, with the image commonly referred to as "Lady in a fur wrap" and attributed to El Greco (see for example here and here). I have thus exchanged it for one that undoubtedly shows Catherine Michelle. Huon (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: somebody is interested in placing again and again the portrait of Lady in a fur wrap...just for saying it's from Anguisola? Nowadays consense is it's not from that painter, and there are doubts it's Catherine Michelle. Well..of course somebody is interested in increasing Anguisola's works. 93.156.74.203 (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved with no objections. (non-admin closure) -  2pou (talk) 07:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Catherine Michelle of Spain →  – The current article title is another example of one of those names that is only found on wikipedia or as a result of wikipedia. English speakers do not translate "Micaela" to Michelle. They are different names: Michelle is a French form. Michaela is a perfectly normal English-language name that everyday people are familiar with. Use common name as found in reliable English-language sources: . DrKay (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 June 2020
Talk:Infanta Luisa Fernanda of Spain

message: Why is she Duchess of Montpensier?! She was a French duchess by marriage not birth! This does not make sense, if no one moves it I will as it is misleading Monsieur le Duc LouisPhilippeCharles (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name