lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Father Mulcahy

message: I seem to recall that the character was named after "Losing Pitcher" Mulcahy--Hugh Mulcahy of the Phillies (which may account for the later use of the character as being from Philadelphia). This may have been in the novel. Anyone else recall this and should it be added somewhere?134.243.211.185 (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Losing Preacher" Mulcahy
Talk:15 August (2001 film)

message: I am proposing that the name of this article should be "15 August (2001 film)" now that there is a film with the title August 15th. The other film is currently at August 15th (Sundance Short Film), but unless someone objects it will be moved to August 15th (2008 film) soon. While the names are not exactly the same, they are close enough that some confusion might result. Please consult WP:NCF for more information on the subject. —A 06:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it has been over a week and no one has commented on this, I'll assume that everyone is okay with it and go ahead with the page move myself. I have also moved August 15th (Sundance Short Film) to August 15th (2008 film) as per the as per the proposed move on it's talk page. Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 15:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Steinitz Variation

message: There are (several) (Steinitz) (Variations), and the Steinitz V. of the Petrov described in this article isn't even (any) of the (best) (known) or most important.  At first I thought this should be merged and redirected, but since a redirect to Petrov's Defence would be inappropriate, now I think it should become a disambig.  Any thoughts?  Quale (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed there are many Steinitz Variations. Not sure what 'disambig.' is that you propose. ChessCreator (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Quale it looks good. Nicely done. ChessCreator (talk) 16:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:Jimmy Needham

message: I just found it on flickr under curative commons. Can you verify for me that the picture is actually Jimmy Needham? ---Brian Alexander (talk) 02:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Image

message: This guy's my first cousin! I'll gladly send you an autograph if you want.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.90.58 (talk) 19:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello!
Talk:Sons of Maxwell

message: I think that the United Airlines incident section should be in a separate article. Any thoughts?--Edge3 (talk) 13:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree. Given it's size now I've removed some of the original research and useless trivia, it's fine where it is. If it expands significantly with reliably sourced, relevant information, it can be split off. For the moment, United Breaks Guitars directs here so people will be able to find it. GDallimore (Talk) 11:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny how the editors at the United Airlines article will not allow any mention of this incident or video.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.233.178.254 (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true. This issue was discussed in UAL Talk at great length in June and July with the result that it has been included in the "recent news" section of the United Airlines article for many weeks. Centpacrr (talk) 16:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Breaks Guitars 

message: As there are no WP entries for Don and Dave separately, I think that their solo albums should be listed here, too. 125.162.47.86 (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solo Albums
Talk:James Baird (footballer)

message: *Delete - Quite obviously written by the subject of the article. Paste (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Delete as well, non notable. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Talk to Me) 21:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: *Delete - not notable. Sunderland06  13:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability discussion 

message: The article needs a rewrite, but there are verifiable sources asserting notability. And the talk page is not the place to conduct an AfD discussion.   Dlohcierekim  14:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declined speedy 
Talk:Raimon

message: Shouldn't it be [raj'mon]?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.32.177.221 (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, Catalan and Valencian pronunciation of his name is with the accent on O, not on A. --Enric.enwiki (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA for Raimon
Talk:Maternal and Child Health Bureau

message: An "NPOV" note was posted for this article.  However, no information was left as to who posted it and why.  Please address the problem with the article to specifically allow constructive discussion towards a resolution, such as identifying specific passages, elements, or phrasings that are problematic so a mutually resolution can be reached.
Thank you,
(Mulysse (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Stefanos Korkolis

message: Some of the text on this page matches with some of the text at Stefanos Korkoli's home page. However, that text was added to the article with this edit on 20 June 2018. An Internet Archive version of Korkoli's home page dated 9 August 2018 does not include the text (there are formatting problems on the archived version of the page which make it unreadable, but the source can be viewed), so it seems more likely that the text on Korkolis's page was copied from Wikipedia.
I don't know the details of copyright issues, but I did enough research to figure out the above, and wanted to leave it here in case anyone else needs it. SchreiberBike | ⌨  04:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear copyright concern
Talk:Joseph G. Healey

message: *Keep - I would have thought that he appears to have made a significant contribution in his areas of expertise and is a much published author? Paste (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed a number of bare urls that were misattributed sources. For example, If you say someone held a position at a university, the reference needs to support that appointment - not just be a link to the university. I also deleted external links as urls in the body of the article and some puffery (See WP:PUFF but there is more to come out. As it stands the article is largely unsourced and needs to be trimmed down, written in an encyclopedic tone (currently reads like a CV) and bare urls properly cited. Lastly, the long list of published works needs to be trimmed down to only notable works. Flat Out let's discuss it 15:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Toby Love

message: The dates of his birthday are contradictory. Need to find out what day is actually his birthday.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.16.101.190 (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: New birthday information would need WP:RS source. Removed both versions for now. GermanJoe (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haywards (pickles)

message: Why have u stopped producing the GENUINE pickled gherkins.  I cannot get them anywhere!!!!!
90.206.243.182 (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:William Overton (Portland founder)

message: Labeling this article in its current form a stub misunderstands the amount of available material. This article includes a lot more about the man than I thought existed -- possibly all that is known about the man. Well, unless someone digs thru Texas records & finds out what happened to him -- if that is where he went & if he kept the name. Okay, it also leaves out that he is usually called a Mountain Man. William Overton is a mysterious figure known for one notable act -- helping to found Portland, Oregon. -- llywrch (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have changed the assessments to start-class. If the article really does give "possibly all that is known about the man", then C-class would be appropriate (despite the article's short length), as the current text appears to be well-written and cites good sources for almost everything, but I don't know enough about the subject to be able to judge that myself. But it is certainly better than stub class. SJ Morg (talk) 05:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Very much agree. -Pete (talk) 07:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a stub
Talk:2007 Carnation murders

message: Isn't the title "Carnation Massacre 2007" too subjective? It doesn't fit in the category of a massacre, so it should be renamed to "Carnation, Washington shooting" or "Carnation, Washington slayings." The year added in the title is also unnecessary.
An example of this would be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crandon%2C_Wisconsin_shooting
70.137.148.27 (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know.  I think that, given the total way that this thing played out, "massacre" might be an appropriate descriptor.  But I do agree that the 2007 is unnecessary; how many such events have occurred that could be so named?  Unschool (talk) 05:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the List of events named massacres the term "massacre" is generally used when the killings are indescriminate, while "shootings" or "killings" is used when the victims are targeted; however, a Google search shows that some media identify it as the "Carnation Massacre". momoricks (make my day) 04:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjective title name
Talk:Västmanland

message: :Image:Västmanland.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Västmanland.png
Talk:Dinner Party Stakes

message: As the "Dixie Stakes" no longer exists, and the Dinner Party Stakes is the new name for the race, the page's name should no longer read "Dixie Stakes".2600:6C56:6400:195:D0DA:609E:32A0:720 (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs retitling
Talk:Stephen Strafford

message: *Attained 3 star rank
*Senior officer during World War II - eg Officer Commanding Advanced HQ (North) of the British Air Forces in France
*Has own biographical page on www.rafweb.org - Is the Wikipedia intended to be a lesser reference that other references? Greenshed (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion - surely not
Talk:Boy Rangers of America

message: * There is a Boy Rangers of America, Inc registered in Wilmington, NC  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  15:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 
Talk:110 West 7th Building

message: This building does actually have a (somewhat) notable history; it was originally built as the headquarters for Cities Service (Citgo) when that now-controversial oil giant left New York and Bartlesville and consolidated operations in Tulsa.  For many years its brightly lit white exterior was one of Tulsa's most distinctive nighttime landmarks.  But I have not yet found a clear third party reference to document this history, although you can find citations mentioning that it used to be called the Cities Service Building.  If anyone can find a clear mention of the building's original purpose, it would be helpful to establish the notability of the building. Arxiloxos (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations located for the building's history and its status as a local "landmark"; changes implemented, "notability questioned" notice deleted. Arxiloxos (talk) 23:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:National Rivers Authority

message: Hi, I stucked a bit at the sentence of the second paragraph. Is all information alright, or maybe there is a typo?
The assets and the staff of the RWAs were divided up at privatisation but all the assets relating to water supply reservoirs were transferred to the RWAs, even in cases where there were strong recreational and fisheries interests in the reservoirs. ... then
Complex charging arrangements were also put in place whereby the newly created companies paid abstraction charges to the NRA for water removed from surface and ground waters but the NRA -> What are the newly created companies?? User:Maplefanta (talk) 22:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: you're right, it must have been a typo - it made no sense as it was--C Hawke (talk) 17:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: No it went in 1996 - I have added a sentence to the article to clarify that.  Velella  Velella Talk   11:58, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:1940 in the United Kingdom

message: :Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:StPaulsCathedral.jpg

message: Churchill's V for Victory signn photo was taken of Churchill on his return from the Third Washington Conference (TRIDENT) Washington, D.C. in May 1943 -- not in 1940. I was prompted to research the date as I remember reading that he took to the hand gesture V sign later in the war not early on. Quoting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_sign Section 2.1 "in July 1941, Churchill referred approvingly to the V for Victory campaign in a speech, from which point he started using the V hand sign. Early on he sometimes gestured palm in (sometimes with a cigar between the fingers). Later in the war, he used palm out."</br>
With this in mind I shall remove the image from this wikipage.--Brenont (talk) 23:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churchill's V for Victory sign
Talk:Hunter Lewis

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Alternativecover.jpg, found on :Hunter Lewis, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: Cambridge Associates should be a separate entry linked from this profile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.43.252.66 (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a link to Cambridge Associates. Adubs222 (talk) 03:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company name 

message: I added external links within the body of the Other Activities section for organizations that did not have a Wiki page (and used internal linking for those that did) in the 18:48, 19 January 2011 revision, but have since moved the external links to the External links section (as seen in the 20:32, 19 January 2011 revision) because I was not certain whether it was appropriate to have the external links in the body of the article. I looked over the External Links Wiki page for guidance but I still am not entirely sure whether it's okay to have any external links within the body of an article.  Any advice on this from looking at the two revisions?  Slowarithmetic (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links within body of "Other Activities" 
Talk:Phillippe de Oliveira

message: I've added an interwiki to the Tamil article about him.  Since he wasn't Tamil himself, I don't think we need his name in Tamil script in the article itself.  Of course, if someone disagrees, it's now a simple matter of cutting and pasting the interwiki link! -- Arvind (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vanniar (Chieftain)

message: Ihaveabandonedmychild is the sockpuppeted account whose only motto is to degrading and vandalism. Block him permanently. Poniatowski of leipzig (talk) 13:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Admins please lock this page from further editing. This page has suffered relentless attempts of vandalism . Vanniar title has nothing to do with Vanniyar[Pallis] caste during medeival times . This title was later appropriated by Palli people as a part of their 19th century struggle to ascend in the caste hierarchy and proclaim a dignified status. Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism by anonymous IDs 

message: The redirect Vanniar(Sri Lanka) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 23:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Vanniar(Sri Lanka)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Abaco (web browser)

message: does lame refer to something else or is it suppose to diminish the browser. 83.131.91.120 (talk) 22:37, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luca Barla

message: There are two cyclists with the name Luca Barla. According to Cyclingarchives.com it's the other Luca Barla who rides for Androni. --83.101.8.208 (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is more or less confirmed by the UCI. I will correct these in the next few days of someone else doesn't do it first. SeveroTC 22:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: other Luca Barla
Talk:University Club Tower (Tulsa)

message: Another notable "popular culture" fact about the University Club Tower is that it appeared memorably in a pivotal scene of the film Tex based on the S.E. Hinton book.  (This is citable from assorted Tulsa websites like Tulsa TV Memories.)  I'm a brand new registrant (after lurking for a long time), so before I just add it in, I want to ask if the community thinks this kind of "popular culture" fact is appropriate for this kind of article, or is it too trivial?--Arxiloxos (talk) 06:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ringiculidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 16:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Wolverton Town F.C.

message: Hi. This article should be merged with Wolverton A.F.C., but only to highlight the latter status of Wolverton A.F.C. The correct procedure would be to clarify the link by inserting into the Wolverton A.F.C. article something akin to the following:
:"Wolverton A.F.C. were reformed in 2004 as Wolverton Town F.C., an amateur Association Football club based in Wolverton, Milton Keynes."
The rest of the information is not notable as regards Wikipedia guidelines, and should be discarded.
This page, Wolverton Town F.C., should then be made a redirect to → Wolverton A.F.C. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 22:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the statement "doesn't seem to have any other claim to notability" in the prod, the fact that they are a reformation of a defunct but notable football club, and who qualify as such for a mention in the Wolverton A.F.C. article, means that the article should instead be considered for a valid redirect to Wolverton A.F.C. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 11:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are the continuation of a notable club then the current club would at least get a mention. As such, a small merge and redirect would be proper; I think outright deletion whilst this is being decided/acted upon isn't helpful. As such I'm disputing the prod and removing the tag, and I'll replace with a redirect. --kingboyk (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me, I probably should have thought of that myself in the first place.......... ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wolverton A.F.C.]]
Talk:Clark Stakes

message: The article doesn't specify whether this race is run over dirt or grass. I'm fairly sure it's the latter but not sure enough to add it to the article. Any help would be appreciated. Joefromrandb (talk) 03:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow do I feel stupid!! Strike that! Joefromrandb (talk) 03:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turf race?
Talk:Gambrinus (beer)

message: Which company "was founded in 1869?" The beer is brewed by Pilsner Urquell which was founded in 1842. 109.148.131.232 (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership/Date unclear