lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cheryl (singer)

message: , not sure what you meant by the link to the non-existent wp:notatabloid on your last revert. Perhaps frustration over the fact that the source referenced is not considered one of the Wikipedia:Deprecated sources, but you think it should be? Take that up at the deprecated sources page. Also not sure why so fastidious believing that a report calling Jean-Bernard Fernandez-Versini her "ex-husband" does not mean divorced. Perhaps frustration that they did not refer to him with the entire phrase "the person who was once her husband but has since been divorced thus is now her ex-husband"? Take that up with the magazine editor who did not chastise their reporter and demand 17 words when one says the same thing.
All, of course, is now moot, because you found the golden ticket! After years wasted protecting the note "Please do not change without a citation to a reliable source published in February 2017 or later, or prior consensus on the talk page. The latter is preferred as this issue has been discussed extensively and reports from sources remain unclear", and warnings of WP:OR, you were the one who aced the search effort and found a terrific source, from 4 years ago, using all the right words to do with this issue.
All kidding aside, that's a nice catch. I searched on three separate occasions and had not found that particular reference. Too bad you had not found it 4 years earlier. Now if you could just find something to keep others from messing with the "mononymously as Cheryl" edits.  Thanks for the fix. Jmg38 (talk) 06:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  You solved it! 

message: I have removed a paragraph which referred to a long 'spent' offence. Please see the rationale here (at General Principles) and here (at editing a biographical detail). Happy to discuss. Emmentalist (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheryl is a public figure, the incident is covered by still-online BBC and Telegraph articles which are wp:RS. This is covered by wp:BLPCRIME. Adakiko (talk) 08:23, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, @Adakiko BLP:CRIME does not cover cases where there has been a conviction, which is why I've raised it here. Both of your points are circular, I think. There's no question of content being removed from internet publications. The question is whether aggregators and search engines should include spent convictions in aggregations and searches. Similarly, if WP:GNG is satisfied then the subject is notable by definition. My deletion is on the basis that very old media references to minor 'spent' convictions should not be included in aggregators like Wikipedia, as is intended by law in the UK and elsewhere. Do you think you might reconsider in the light of this? All the best, Emmentalist (talk) 06:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed paragraph
Talk:Nouse

message: Just a point I'd like to ask: where does the idea that nouse is more 'upmarket' than Vision come from? Though it is only my opinion I'd say that nouse comes across as the less 'up-market' of the two in terms of appearance, quality of the content and general reliability/accurracy/breaking news. I'd aslo go so far to say from my experience this is shared by many studnets too. Evil Eye 23:27, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the prod tag because Nouse is reasonably high up in notability for student papers, evidenced by its comparatively high search engine rankings (I often get Nouse hits when I'm Googling for Wiki sources).  Ford MF (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod removal
Talk:Hertfordshire puddingstone

message: I provided a citation link to the Herts county record office (HALS) as requested. If this was not what was required, please clarify.  --BillC 23:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
File talk:Skyline-New-York-City.jpg

message: ------
This image has been spliced together. You can see the Metlife building on both sides of the picture. I say a new picture is used instead of this one.
What do you mean spliced together? Its a 360 degree panorama shot, so it has to be a compilation of images. There is a small degree of overlap, but this is largely unavoidable. --Jleon 12:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Socată

message: Elderflower has pictures.
Could you add here the one used for Socata?
--Error 23:40, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: What is the difference between socată and elderflower cordial? Do they deserve different articles?  --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 23:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha, according to the French version socată is fermented which elderflower cordial is not. Can someone confirm that socată is always fermented? In that case it should be added to the article. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes,  it is always fermented  - otherwise it would't be "socata" but just lemonade with some flowers in it :). If drunk early (e.g. in less than 2 days), it will be sweeter and the alcohol level will be low (probably less than 2%, depending on various factors as sugar and temperature). In 3-4 days, the alchool content can be higher than in beer. If the fermentation takes place in tightly closed vessels, the result is a highly carbonated beverage much like beer. It is also possible to ferment in covered, but not closed tight vessels like described here (in Romanian): https://www.frunza-verde.ro/reteta-de-socata (they also add a few grains of rice or some yeast, to improve fermentation efficiency). -Paul- (talk) 21:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Elderflower cordial and socată

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Category talk:User fi-4

message: Since there now seems to be 4 levels of non-native language templates, I created fi-4, and put myself in that category, being a bilingual Finland-Swede... --Janke | Talk 23:44, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I can't tell where to fix this, but it's reporting fi-4 on this page as fi-1.  Otherwise, the fi-4 template seems fine... --Ryan 21:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it, nevermind. --Ryan 21:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fi-4 typo?
Talk:Membrane mirror

message: This article seems like it might rather be a footnote on the Solar sail page?
No other articles link to this at the moment.
I'm new, and not aware of policies in this regard, so won't touch it further (just made a minor edit). Tøpholm (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be a seperate article?
Talk:Kyoto Prefecture

message: The entire history section of this article reads like the history of Kyoto city, nothing really looks like the history of prefecture. -67.172.181.206 05:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: A survey is being conducted at Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related_articles)#Prefectures and macrons to determine which prefectures should have their spelling "macron-ized", per the existing manual of style.  Oita has been changed already, and each of the others is current being discussed (Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto, Hokkaido, Hyogo, and Kochi).  Please join the discussion if you wish.  Neier 00:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling of prefectures 

message: I thought Kyoto was a city, Just goes to show how much I know????!!!!--NOODLER450 13:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Thought... 
Talk:United States men's national soccer team

message: There should be a mention of BARRA 76 SUPPORTERS GROUP under Team Image/ Supporters.
https://www.barra76.com/ 97.102.169.190 (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supporters 

message: The sources for "The Stars and Stripes" and "The Yanks" are just using generic slang terms for Americans. These are not true nicknames. Also, a commercial is not a reliable source. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Bleacher Report, World Soccer Talk, and Soccer America good enough for you? How about Goal.com, NBC, and the Sports Business Journal? Maybe the USMNT players association or USA Today? A quick search would have returned these with ease, so what justification exactly do you have for deleting these? Also, the Guardian is a reliable source. Jay eyem (talk) 03:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of your examples are, as I've said before, slang, not clearcut nicknames, but the players' association is semi-acceptable (is it really independent?) and USA Today is okay. I never said The Guardian wasn't a reliable source; it's just not entirely clear whether it was using slang or a nickname. Remove the ad "source" and add these two and we're good to go. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake nicknames 

message: United States' FIFA profile need to update to non-archived link in (External links) to (https://www.fifa.com/about-fifa/associations/USA) 154.180.3.130 (talk) 11:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2023 

message: Why is Jordan Pefok not on the eligible players or former players that could be called up list. He is already being snubbed by the coach, Wikipedia doesn't need to add to it. ChadThomasBauer (talk) 12:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no eligible player list on this article. Former players are only players who have been called up in the last 12 months. Pefok has not been called up in the last 12 months from what I can tell. Demt1298 (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan Pefok 

message: Alan Soñora is no longer unattached and plays for Huracán in Copa de la Liga in Argentina. MysteryMingo (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: https://cahuracan.com/futbol/plantel-profesional MysteryMingo (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2023
Talk:2005 Atlantic hurricane season/Archive 3

message: In the article William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin, there is a reference to the storm of June 1858 which wrecked the laying of the transatlantic telegraph cable. It would be good to have an article on the storm if possible. Cutler 08:16, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
:We article writers have only gone back as far as 1894 so far. I think we came to a consensus here that we would only go back as 1886. Maybe it could be noted somewhere else? -- RattleMan 09:28, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As this storm happened in the eastern Atlantic at about 52°N, and "lasted more than a week" it doesn't sound like a tropical cyclone. It's not in the historically reconstructed tables. A newspaper reported before the event that "The fortnight succeeding the 5th of June has been ascertained by the experience of many years to be the calmest of the year".--Keith Edkins 21:20, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  There was no cyclonic storm that hit the Atlantic coast, or anywhere near it in June 1858.  The only documented cyclonic storm occurred June 12 and was loacted in the Yucatan Channel.  The storm that may have taken out telegraph cables was probably just one of those nasty early summer storms.  Will try to see if i can dig up an article on it regardless. Boort 22:06, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storm of June 1858
Talk:Caol Ila distillery

message: Note: this page has been structured with sections, but not much content yet. I'm working on it. If anybody knows about whisky, by all means, fill in the blanks, or change the sections if they aren't appropriate. Thanks. Deirdre 00:35, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've fixed the Gaelic but is the English correct? Most non-Gaelic speakers pronunciations have been closer to /kʰeilˈailə/ - not that there is a standard mispronunciation. Perhaps we should mention is has a range of mispronunciations? Akerbeltz (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* [TYPE HERE] The corordinance took me to South Africa...not Islay Scotland
--71.237.144.17 (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Diego Luna

message: The bulk of the prose in this article is found on http://www.mostbeautifulman.com/actors/diegoluna/bio.shtm which claims copyright.  Please do not restore it unless it can be shown that this is not the case. — Kbh3rdtalk 04:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One of the spouses needs to be Jabba the Hutt. Diego wishes to consider Jabba the Hutt as one of his spouses. Lizann.p (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2017 

message: Under Films make the following addition  
2017 Scarface (2017 Film) - Tony Montana
Jkeefe416 (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Stickee (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2017
Talk:Northrop P-61 Black Widow

message: Although the article duly notes that the P-61 did not 'have any significant impact' in the CBI theatre, because the Japanese did not operate at night by that time, I believe it's a matter of record that the 426th and 427th Night Fighter Squadrons, equipped with the P-61 and assigned to US Fourteenth Air Force at Burmese and Chinese bases, shot down quite a number of friendly aircraft, including US C-47s and, most controversially, two RAF Liberators (out of eleven) operating on special-duties flights, i.e. resistance support, from Bengal to Indo-China on the night of, I think, 22-23 January 1945. It is believed that the 426th were responsible, since the Americans informed the British that a pilot of the 426th had filed claims for one destroyed and one damaged. Three Liberators failed to return that night. One possibly hit high terrain in bad weather, but the other two were probably shot down by the rogue P-61. The crews, and their resistance passengers who were due to make parachute drops, were all lost. The Japanese had no aircraft in the area, obviously, and those P-61 squadrons are only known to have shot down friendly aircraft. Although the weather was difficult in places that night, any American pilot incapable of identifying the silhouette of a Liberator, which resembled no enemy aircraft, shouldn't really have been flying. I'm not going to truffle up the sources right now, but they are there, and a couple of them, including Richard J. Aldrich, Intelligence and the War Against Japan: Britain, America and the Politics of Secret Service, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, ISBN 978-0521641869, pp.210-211, are mentioned here. https://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-576312.html Khamba Tendal (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBI Theater
Talk:Hydantoin

message: If anyone knows what "bromacetyl urea" and "alcoholic ammonia" are called these days, I'd love to hear it. Oh, and I'd love to know how it's made in modern times.Rmky87 01:23, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "Alcholic ammonia" varies from use to use. Like the name implies, it's typically a mixture of ethanol or methanol with a smaller amount of ammonia. I've seen ranges of 70-80% alcohol and 5% of a 20-30% ammonia solution with the remainder being water. I'm still trying to track down "bromacetylurea" - finding info on acetylurea is simple enough, but nothing on the structure of the brominated derivative. dil 17:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.--Rmky87 22:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Brennus

message: Removed the following:
In Ireland the Brenins were a caste of lawmakers and judges. Once every five years all the brenins met at the hill of Tara to discuss law and standarize it for the next five years. At the height of their power not even the Ard Rí Érenn would challenge their will.
This is not true; the law making caste of Ireland were the Brehon, not the brenins. --Poorpaddy 01:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: any relation between Brennus and Brian?
4.249.63.88 (talk) 21:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this article is extensive enough and contains more than enough facts. It can hardly be called a stub. Mhaesen 10:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a stub 

message: I've slightly re-phrased this section because "it is currently thought" gives a false impression that the idea Welsh brenin derives from earlier *Brigantinos is just one of a succession of theories and that it might change. In fact it's what all the reputable scholars have been saying since the 1890s. Paul S (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brenin & Wording
Talk:Absence of Malice

message: Is it appropriate to refer to someone named "Gallagher" as the son of a Mafia boss?  My sense is that "Mafia" used without modifier, implies specifically Italian organized crime, whereas Newman's character would appear pretty clearly to be of Irish background.  Might we perhaps used "organized crime" instead? john k (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mafia? 

message: Absence of Malice was reviewed extensively in publications by journalists, and it's still assigned in journalism classes. 
This entry contains reviews by standard movie reviewers, who are treating it as entertainment, but it didn't have any reviews by journalists about the journalistic issues they deal with routinely. 
If you are a journalism student who came to this page, perhaps you could find a good review or two and add it. --Nbauman (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews by journalists 

message: Shall we call Absence of Malice a romantic thriller drama film or is it just fine as is? --TMProofreader (talk) 19:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film genre 

message: I just tried to look up this film in Wikipedia and got redirected to the page 'Actual malice'. This is because WP has this page on the film 'Absence of Malice', and also has a redirect page from 'Absence of malice' to 'Actual malice'. If you're not ultra strict with your capitalisation when searching, or don't read the drop down box carefully, it looks like there is no film page. Anyone object if I move this page to a new one called 'Absence of Malice (1981) film'? The 'Actual malice' page probably needs an About hatnote template, too. Or is there a better solution? Masato.harada (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Fort Prince George

message: There was also a Fort Prince George in the Carolinas during the French and Indian War. One day, this page will need to become a disambiguation page like Fort Loudoun, which coincidentally was the names of forts built by the colonies of Pennsylvania and South Carolina.
: I linked it. Pfly 17:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Also a Fort Prince George in the Carolinas
Talk:Loveseat

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:56, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

message: With Couch, any thoughts?
†he Bread 02:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That idea's already been downvoted once. While in American English, they are essentially the same thing ("love-seat" usually meaning "two-seat couch"), they are two very different types of furniture in Commonwealth English, where a loveseat is a unique and very specific S-shaped piece of furniture. DewiMorgan (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: = what's that "S-shape" thing? Please clarify? 
= useful? -> http://www.ebay.com/gds/The-History-of-the-Loveseat-/10000000177589697/g.html 109.252.61.26 (talk) 03:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly needs an image for illustrative, so I'll add one - the current image on the page is for the US-english use of the term, where it just means "two-seat couch". DewiMorgan (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-shape 

message: I've reworked this somewhat, separating the two definitions (2-person couch, S-shaped double seat) that were previously conflated. There remain all too few good cites.
Over on List of words having different meanings in American and British English (A–L), it claims without citation that the two definitions are regional, US vs UK, but while that's certainly correct according to my own experience, I can't find any significant sources to back it up, and in fact both Oxford and Webster's dictionaries define "loveseat" just as having two seats, without addressing seat orientation at all.
So I am proposing doing one of the following:
1) split this page as a disambiguation page, directing both to couch and to courting bench, and moving any salvageable content from here into the relevant linked pages.
2) merge to - merge this page into courting bench with a Template:Did_you_mean directing to couch.
3) merge from - merge courting bench into this one, as the arguably larger topic. There's potentially scope here to become an encyclopaedic page in itself, covering the history of the term "loveseat" and the areas of crossover between the two types. But it would take some digging to find that, and I don't feel I'm qualified (or, let's face it, interested) enough to do it.
DewiMorgan (talk) 18:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: split - My own vote, as I don't feel there's enough to make this a worthwhile page describing the union of the two meanings. DewiMorgan (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split/Merger proposal
Talk:Umbar

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 02:10, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not the subject of multiple independant secondary sources as required by WP:NN and does not have any real world content as clarified by WP:FICT [[Guest9999 22:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placed Notability Tag 

message: I propose that Corsairs of Umbar be merged here. There is a lot of overlap, and both are short articles.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Temple of Hercules Victor

message: RScheiber (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: and unrequested - in fact most "articles of this type" don't have them, not least because the known significant fact do not suit infobox format. Johnbod (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox request
Talk:Coins of the Republic of Ireland

message: I added the sentence about old pennies still being in circulation. I work in a shop/petrol station in Limerick city, and you'd be surprised how many you'll see - I come across at least one penny a week, posing as a 5c coin. Some of the other employees working there don't seem to notice either, as I often see pennies alreasy in the tills! 
I was also astonished last week to see an elderly man pull out of his wallet - among several Euro notes - an old tenner! And it wasn't even the last series of tenners - it was one of the 'series B' ones!! Haven't seen one of those in years... --Zilog Jones 02:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)