lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Save Our State (Australia)

message: This page has just been created and has been updated once already and will be updated further when my references are to hand. I have stated why SOS is signifcant. Just google 'save our suburbs' and you will see instantly that this is the case if you are in any doubt. Please allow me to proceed in good faith rather than just deleting it. If you have anything to add about SOS, please do so. Thanks, Eyedubya 02:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's already a good start, and that indeed is what the  tag is for.  Given that you're likely hard at work editing it, I'm sure passing admins will give it some time before deciding.  Coren 03:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job.  You need to source those claims, now, but they are certainly sufficient to not warrant speedy deletion.  Happy editing!  Coren 03:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Save Our Suburbs has been on the WikiProject Melbourne list for a long time. Good to see that someone has made a start on the article. - Cuddy Wifter 03:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd recommend adding a criticisms section. Nick carson (talk) 11:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * http://www.tac.com.au/%7Etomak/  This dead link has been removed. wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 01:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link spam

message: Is the article about the community group or the political party?
The article says:
The external links indicate that the community group is still called Save Our Suburbs, not ... State. Perhaps only the party changed its name, not the group. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  community group or party?
Talk:Q-Bus

message: Let's move card list to the separate list page. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lists — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alecv (talk • contribs) 21:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As it's been a day or two since this suggestion, I've taken the matter into my own rather inept hands.  Hopefully nothing went horribly wrong in the process. --Vometia (talk) 06:40, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q-Bus cards list to separate list page ?
Talk:AT&T Hobbit

message: It seems to me that it would be more correct to refer to compilers instead of programming languages in the first paragraph where it talks about how stacks are used to manage active local variables and subroutine calls. There are very few programming languages that explicitly require stacks (FORTH et al.) but many compilers use stacks even when the language doesn't. Perhaps a little discussion here would be in order before changing the article. 173.11.109.149 (talk) 20:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Programming language" vs. "compiler" in the first paragraph 

message: The article doesn't need need a disambiguation from The Hobbit (film series), which was made by New Line Cinema, which is now part of AT&T's WarnerMedia unit, does it? --68.50.214.18 (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AT&T's other Hobbit
Talk:Signetics 2650

message: Given that this CPU was developed by a US company and produced there, from what I can see, why are all the prices and references within in AUD? Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because no-one since 2008 has  read the article been troubled enough to look up US prices for the part? --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

text: 2Q/1975 by The Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology: Volume 10. Even the introductory ad on that page is from October of 1975. Why would an introductory be published 2 years after it's introduction? --CyberXReftalk 03:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd units 

message: See this: "Synertek made a chip labeled 2650-P-02 that is often mistaken for a 2650 processor. It
is NOT a 2650 processor and use of it in the Test Board may produce unexpected results
or damage."
www.cpushack.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2650_Testboard_Manual.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DD:3F45:6EE3:8DA6:F1B4:AE32:A1DC (talk) 22:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second source? 

message: The paragraph on Uses mentions an incorrect CPU clock speed:
Emerson Arcadia 2001 which was released in 1982 and which used a Signetics 2650 running at 3.58 MHz as a CPU belong to this group together with many other ones software-compatible (Leonardo, Hanimex MPT-03 etc.).
This cannot be correct, as the standard 2650(A) ran up to 1.25 MHz. Even the 2650A-1 variant only ran up to 2MHz. The Arcadia schematics (e.g. at wiki.console5.com) show that the system contains a 3.58 MHz clock (approximately), but that the clock signal is divided by four, giving a CPU clock speed of 0.895 MHz. This inaccurate information shows on many console-related websites. I will correct this in the article. EelcoVriez (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clock speed
Talk:ETRAX CRIS

message: Forgive my english, but would the word "Both" not fit better? "...CGA-1 (Coax Gate Array) which contained both a IBM 3270 (coax) communications and a AS/400..."instead of "...CGA-1 (Coax Gate Array) which contained booth IBM 3270 (coax) communications, AS/400..."
CodeAsm (talk CodeAsm)
:It now says "It contains IBM 3270 (coax) and IBM 5250 (Twinax) communications.", which lacks "both" and "booth". Guy Harris (talk) 04:38, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of chips

message: Isn't this more of a "system on a chip" than just a processor? 
82.174.247.125 (talk) 09:54, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, the only device that the page refers to as a (micro)processor is the CGA-1 and, if it "contains IBM 3270 (coax) and IBM 5250 (Twinax) communications" in the sense that it has hardware to support the link layer of 3270 and 5250 communications, then, yes, it sounds like an SoC.  (According to system on a chip, the chip doesn't have to contain all "components of a computer or other electronic system", just most of them.) Guy Harris (talk) 04:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: SOC
Talk:Montvale (processor)

message: I'm replacing this article with a  redirect. The Foxton info is redundant with the Foxton article, the rest of the info is obsolete and unsourced and I have placed up-to-date sourced info on the Itanium page. This article was only referenced from three places, all trivial. I also remove the "computer" priject template from this talk page since the article is no longer relevant. -Arch dude 03:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:TMS34010

message: It's already flagged as citation needed, but for me "In 1987 TI provided the the first demonstration of true real-time 3D games with stereo sound effects on a personal computer (PC)" is trivially false. "true real-time 3D games" are a lot older than 1987, e.g. Elite, Mercenary, and many of the home conversions of Star Wars, Battlezone, etc. Some of the platforms on which they appeared, such as the Amstrad CPC came wired for stereo out of the box — in that case it's not even opt-in, it's simply the case that if stereo speakers are plugged in then the different audio channels have fixed assignments to the left and right speakers. So if I had stereo speakers plugged into my Amstrad CPC and I loaded Elite, in what sense am I not looking at "true real-time 3D" with "stereo sound effects", before 1987? I think a leap in quality is being oversold as a first. — 64.48.93.0 (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The first true real-time 3D" 

message: Regarding the above disputed claim, currently present in the history section:
While the cited sources certainly are existence proof (if you weren't already aware, which many were not, both back then and now), these sources do not really do much to support the claim these boards had been common. These boards were very high-end back in the day, and arguably aspirational products to some, but they didn't ship in volume and drop in price in a way that would justify calling them "common". Actually, they were relatively uncommon, and even many IT experts back in the day did not know about them, that's how niche they were, and they didn't really escape that high-end niche, despite their manufacturers' best attempts. The mainstream moved from cheap VGA clones to SVGA, to Diamond Stealth and S3s, and onwards and upwards to Voodoo and the like, passing by what could have been the next big thing. Granted, this comment isn't well-sourced either, but neither is the above article claim, and I don't think it can be. 
Second thought, I should probably clarify/concede that the claim "Such boards were common in the early 1990s" becomes justifiable if it's only generally applied to "video accelerator cards for IBM PC compatibles", however even then it's not right to add "of which the TMS34010 was central". It's more like "of which the TMS34010 was one." The TMS34010 certainly was an early video accelerator card chip. You might even call it trailblazing if you want to big it up, but in and of itself, it did not have the good life (in the mass market) that maybe you might feel it deserved. Video accelerator cards became very common a little later, but the TMS34010 itself? In PC-compatible video accelerators? Not really.
I'd even say that in a way, the currently existing paragraph contradicts itself, because the "professional-level" qualifier is pretty much the opposite of "common" – so there's already a concession in there that "common" isn't true.
—ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 07:09, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Such boards were common in the early 1990s."
Talk:Austintown Fitch High School

message: The current article takes quite a narrow view of Fitch, focusing almost exclusively on sports. We should add some historical and non-sports material to it, not to mention reliable sources for everything. I'll try to get to it in the near future, but don't let me stop anyone else from tackling this. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately  this is a classical  phenomenon  with articles about USA schools. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overwhelmed by sports 

message: Why the name?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fitch?
Talk:U880

message: While it is possible that some early T34VM1 and KR1810VM1 used the East German made U880 dies, later KR1810VM1 likely used domestically developed, or at least modified design.
There is a specific behavior of U880 and derivatives, where the OUTI instruction doesn't clear the carry flag (CF) when HL overflows/rolls over from 0FFFFh to 0x0000h. On most Z80 CPUs, including the original Zilog CPUs, the behavior of OUTI is to clear the CF in this case, even thought documentation says that OUT instruction shouldn't affect CF...
I have two KR1810VM1 CPUs, one dated 9305 and manufactured by Angstrem factory, and another dated 9306 and manufactured by Electronica factory. Both don't test as U880... Where, for example, Romanian made Electronica Bucharest MMN 80CPU, does test as U880, so presumably these guys used U880 dies...
Therefore the claim that post-soviet KR1810VM1 were based on U880 design is somewhat questionable. Skiselev (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further development - (Post)Soviet KR1810VM1
Talk:Kampong Sungai Duhon

message: The main issue in this article is the name. I think the Article was copied and the name was not changed. --Shi Annan (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sungai Tujoh or Sungai Duhon? 
Talk:Apollo PRISM

message: The section "Compilers" says that
"The Apollo compilers were the first commercial compilers to use data-flow analysis and single static assignment techniques."
The IBM Fortran "H" compiler back in the 1960s did data-flow analysis. See for instance the dragon book (Aho, Sethi and Ullman), which gives a primary reference, i think to something by Lowry and Medlock who wrote the compiler. 110.145.170.78 (talk) 04:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  data flow analysis etc
Talk:Terrorism in Sweden

message: What has this with 'Terrorism in Sweden' to do? 
83.248.195.172 13:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zimbabwe 

message: The bombing of the Amalthea ought to have a few sentences as well. Anyone with good sources at home? /Julle (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amalthea bombing 

message: There should be some note about that.  They have killed far more people during the last 10-15 years than any other group.  And during 1930-50 there was some terror acts, like blowing up a papers office in northern Sweden.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:6B0:23:64:226:B9FF:FE7B:68E3 (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish Nationalist 

message: User:Oranjelo100, please motivate the two  templates added in January 2017. Otherwize we do not know when they can be removed.176.10.249.111 (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the "update" top warning signs? 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Yugoslav_Embassy_shooting 109.247.107.231 (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971 embassy shooting
Talk:Asynchronous array of simple processors

message: This article lacks sources, and without such we cannot assess the notability of this subject. Unless sources are forthcoming, this article may end-up on WP:AFD. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:NEC µPD780C

message: This is my own research, so I can't include it in the article, but I did notice that the undocumented flags are affected differently for the SCF and CCF instructions, based on tests performed on 48K and +2A ZX Spectrums. I believe that the 48K in question had a NEC Z80, and the +2A had a Zilog Z80. I'm not aware of any other differences in the behaviour of Zilog and NEC Z80s, though. --StuartBrady (Talk) 16:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCF and CCF instructions
Talk:NEC V60

message: The comment about the Sega Saturn should be removed because it is irrelevant and incorrect:
1. There is no evidence Sega used Model 1 as a reference for the Saturn. The Saturn architecture is entirely unlike Model 1 and bears absolutely no resemblance to it.
2. There is no evidence Sega planned to use a V60 in the Saturn. While the Saturn video hardware is a predecessor for the System 32 video hardware, the rest of the design is highly SH-2 centric (specifically the SH-2 specific SCU and a system memory architecture closely tied to the SH-2 feature set).
The comment is speculative and offers no proof to back up these claims.
130.65.11.98 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  V60 rumors 

message: It was probably just an announcement but  mentions "There was an article about the V80 in the February 13, 1989 issue of EE Times." EE Times on-line archives don't go back that far though, so it's print only. Someone not using his real name (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old EE Times article on the V80 

message: There's an article in English in a French book/proceedings ; it's pretty obscure though obtainable through interlibrary loan in the US. The 2011 paper is unfortunately mostly focused on V70's replacement... Someone not using his real name (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More in-depth source on the space-spec V70 

message: This structured link description is removed from the article. Instead of it, some descriptions need to be added in the article itself. Some general descriptions might be suitable for locating in other computer architecture related articles.Cafeduke (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to maintain
Talk:Manycore processing unit

message: Actually, nobody I know uses the term "manycore processing unit". The class of device that is described in this article is a type of network processor. Dyl 14:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  article name 

message: Where does the statement "Current software architectures can scale on current multicore architectures to about eight processors but have poor ability to scale beyond that number" come from?  Is there something to back this up? 192.91.147.34 10:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  scale reference 

message: * The fact that Intel, AMD and Microsoft are conducting Manycore research proves that Manycore is not relegated to embedded markets only. That also means network accelerators aren't part and parcel of Manycore. 
* The claims about current programming paradigms don't work for more than 8 cores is false. There is no cliff at 8 just as there's no cliff at 4 cores nor at 2 cores. 
* Whoever wrote this article is only looking at the last 10 years or so of computing history. The articles is ignoring the long history of multiprocessing that has existed since the almost the dawn of computing. 
* What this article is trying to describe is a sub-class of network processor. But the term "Manycore" is a larger area of research than that.
In a few weeks, I'm going to cut this article to just a few sentences - saying Manycore is a class of systems where 
there are more than a handful of processor cores within a single piece of silicon. Dyl (talk) 19:03, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is almost 100% original "research" and not correct 

message: It's a word used by amongst others Nvidia marketing teams, and Intel for their Larrabee chip. It does the same job as 'multi core' as a term, I don't see why it needs its own article. --Joffeloff (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. --Joffeloff (talk) 23:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Many core' 

message: I honestly do not think this article is worth keeping as it is too liquid, the computing processors will change next year, we will see 8 cores as a standard in desktops and laptops, then soon 16 and what happens this article and its definition changes. Thus it is not a solidly defined thing and thus does not fit high quality. Nor is it verifiable that "manycore" is a valid word. I do not mean to hurt the posters feeling, thank you for your contribution, we hope you will get this article up to quality requirements. 
Alin0Steglinski (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Too liquid' 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Lolita Ritmanis

message: I'm curious why the author of this article keeps removing the tags I placed on it. Each tag is based on an established wikipedia policy. If you click on the links in the tags, you can read about those policies. If you need help doing this cleanup, please ask. Thanks. Katr67 17:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I'm pretty sure Lolita is actually a Latvian citizen. Maybe someone should fact-check that and change the first sentence of this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.175.166.14 (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  citizenship
Talk:Windows Hardware Engineering Conference

message: WinHEC started long before 2001.  I have bags and t-shirts from late 1990s conferences.  I don't know what year it started in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.134.137.75 (talk) 15:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Taina (TV series)

message: Looking for a new photo for the "Taina" infobox.
:IMDb has some very good pictures of Christina Vidal, the star of the show. That might be a place to start. 67.8.207.23 02:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put one up. Quasyboy 12:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

message: *I say we start a Taina episode list.LAUGH90 03:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Taina episodes

message: Taina? That's my rival show! Why? I'm not fan of it!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.202.147 (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Not this show!
Talk:Houston Cougars baseball

message: Can some please clarify the Conference Championship and Conference Tournament Championships in the info box?  For an example of what I mean, please see Louisiana–Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns baseball.  Since the team has been in multiple conferences in its history, it should be clarified in the infobox.  Also, a conference membership history would be great.  Awesome work, by the way!  It's great to see some other college baseball fans join in! Seancp (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm on it! Yep, I'm one of the few who believes there's not enough coverage of college baseball on Wikipedia. Brianreading (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:Professional Developers Conference

message: I removed the BUILD Windows conference details because this is not PDC.  Microsoft has never officially called it PDC.  All of the information on the web was just assumed by a bunch of tech bloggers with no real information.  PDC is also reported to be happening in Seattle according to a slip on the Microsoft India website, however I must re-iterate that BUILD is not PDC, and Microsoft has made no official announcement regarding PDC.  See here for more details:  http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-pdc-2011-seattle-or-bust/8929
173.255.235.77 (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed BUILD Windows Conference
Talk:Take Me Away (Avril Lavigne song)

message: Does everyone just feel the urge to argue about whether this is a Rock or Post-Grunge or whatever else genre of song or is there actually a reason people are edit-warring over this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by VernoWhitney (talk • contribs) 19:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Santa Monica (Everclear song)

message: This translation is just not correct, one read of the lyrics and it is clear that it is not about suicide, but about new beginnings.  Further more, the song writer addresses his intentions in the following quotes:
"I'm using a place where I grew up and palm trees as iconic references. It's what I grew up with. I grew up in a seaside town called Santa Monica, which is like L.A. but on the coast. I've lived in cold places and been in bad relationships, and I think everybody has a place in their mind that is like a safe haven. It's also about getting away from bad times... the ending of something is also the beginning of something new, whether it's with someone or getting out of a bad job, a bad way of life or an abusive relationship.
In the Eastern way of looking at things, 'Chaos' doesn't necessarily mean no boundaries, it means new beginnings. It's kind of one and the same, something that never ends. It's about getting to a point where you can leave bad things behind and just be self sufficient. There's a sense of romance about it. I feel like that very much now, but I was just getting to where I understood that when I wrote that song."
(emphasis added)
SF: Did you know it was going to be a hit?
Art: I didn't know it was going to be a hit, I don't think like that. I do know that when I played it for people, they liked it, but you can't write songs with that in mind.
This interview can be found at the following link: http://www.songfacts.com/int/2008/01/art-alexakis-everclear.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.141.24.7 (talk) 03:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard people insist that the song is about suicide, and if you look at the fact that Alexakis has been pretty open about his troubled youth and his own suicide attempt by jumping off the Santa Monica pier, it's easy to assume that the song could be autobiographical. But like a lot of great songs (and this is definitely a great song, I still get goosebumps when I hear it) or other works of art, there are multiple possibilities as to its true meaning. I've edited the article to hopefully reflect that and renewed the old fact cite tag, so if somebody else can find a source for that claim, please add it. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Song meaning

message: The song is available in Band Hero  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.92.0.57 (talk) 04:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band Hero