Talk:Airstrike

message: I don't know who made the article, but it could use a lot of expanding.
As for merging it, no. "Bombs" are frequeintly used in Airstrikes, and why anyone would merge them is beyond me. There are too many different listed uses and methods of airstrikes to merge it with anything. Colonel Marksman 20:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[bomb]]

message: Aside from the two I just added, this article does not have any references.  I suggest people begin retracing their steps to add the appropriate refs to what already exists and that all new edits should try to cite their source(s).
JCPH 12:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I think that it would be appropriate for this article to be merged with Close Air Support, and leave a disambiguation link for the other definitions of the word "Airstrike"(eg. Air Raid)
Wiki flight simmer (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, a merge would be useless and pointless. WinterSpw (talk) 00:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: The page is titled "Airstrike", but refers the words "Air Strike" appear multiple times during the article. Which spelling should be used? FrigidNinja (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Airstrike vs. Air Strike

message: Am I being biased in thinking this is totally ridiculous? I wanted to remove it but I thought I would put the question here first. I suppose it can be 'advantageous' if you look at it from a sociopathic military perspective (not slamming military, I just believe ethic ought to have a part in military and this is counter to that), but that phrase seems outrageously spun to me.
Not Joey Clavette (talk) 03:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Collateral damage can be advantageous"

message: Please comment on the page move at Talk:Drone attacks in Pakistan. Uhlan talk  00:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Airstrike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110604211928/http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/a/2237.html to http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/a/2237.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Airstrike. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511012250/http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Air_Power/Pre_WWI/AP1.htm to http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Air_Power/Pre_WWI/AP1.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m6007/is_56/ai_n14700122/pg_16
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified