lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WEEP (Minnesota)

message: I've located the station in the FCC database and updated the link accordingly. I've also expanded the article to the basic minimum for radio station articles plus added a reference from a reliable secondary source that puts this defunct station "in the news" in 2008.  There should be more info available to expand this article a bit more, too. - Dravecky (talk) 12:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: prod tag removed
Talk:Capital Combat

message: The character of Robocop apparently appeared in this event in a joint crossover between NWA/WCW and the then blockbuster Robocop 2. Where? This is mentioned in the introduction, but not mentioned if and when it happens.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.144.189 (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is Robocop
Talk:Lausanne Conference of 1922–1923

message: 94.54.236.236 (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

message: By the way, why is this article rated of low importance? The conference of Lausanne is pretty much the most important conference in the establishment of the republic of Turkey!
Sevres Peace Treaty is not confirmed by Turkish National Assembly therefore it was not officially accepted. Without a valid peace treaty war does not ends officially. (Eg: North and South Korea did not signed a peace treaty) Laousanne Peace Treaty officially finishes the ww1.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.84.223 (talk) 09:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The 13½ Lives of Captain Bluebear

message: I don't agree that the shortest life was the fourth one, at least not in the English version. I don't have the book now, but I remember that I counted the pages and the second life (Hobgoblin Island) was the shortest. Guy0307 20:56, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortest Life 

message: I agree that the plot summary is a little long. One way of shortening it (at least a bit) would be giving up talking about the story in terms of Life 1, Life 2, etc. and making it a continuous narrative. There's also some of the article's author's reflections on the story, which don't really belong in a wikipedia article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afeitarse (talk • contribs) 07:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Plot Summary

message: The current summary is too vague.
I have a more detailed one ready to put on Wikipedia.
If there is no vote by the Ides of March of 2011, I shall proceed with the insert-ification of the summary I propose to insert.
Who has questions?
Vote here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43?9enter (talk • contribs) 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, screw that thought. I've changed my mind under the terms of not making an overweight article. 43?9enter (talk) 04:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Current Summary 

message: >The 131⁄2 Lives of Captain Bluebear follow the adventures of the character Bluebear in the first half of his 27 lives (the joke being that a bluebear lives three times as long as a cat). 
Why is this a joke?  Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 23:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joke? 

message: I read this article again this morning and think it has several problems beginning with the fact that it has no citations.  It also seems to be an incomplete biography written by Moers himself or by someone closely affiliated with him.  It doesn't contain any neutral information about the author or his works with the result that it is a one-sided article.  I think it needs to be written by someone else who can supply more information from a neutral view.  Thank you. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite suggested
Talk:Mudanya

message: The mere fact that Apamea Myrlea is now near (but separate from) modern Mudanya is no basis to merge the two; there is no evidence of continuity of history, inhabitants, culture, or anything showing that Mudanya is in any way a continuation of Apamea. Carlossuarez46 22:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Merger? NO!

message: I removed a very long quote from a 1922 war report, which I think does not fit in this article, at least not without major editing/summarising. You can find the removed part in this old version. Maybe it would fit in the Great Offensive article. Markussep Talk 06:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long quote from 1922 war report
Talk:Şırnak

message: According to Kurdish Wikipdida, the Kurdish alternative name is Şirnak. I'm not sure whether it is suitable for Kurdish orthography or not. Takabeg (talk) 05:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Kurdish name of this city inhabited by Kurds is Şirnex (شرنه خ). --MikaelF (talk) 08:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sirnak has also Assyrian and Arab population, should we add all languages that we hear? Beshogur (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we should, why not? The more knowledge, the better, this is what Wikipedia is about! --MikaelF (talk) 23:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Kurdish name

message: So please guys don't make it a playground. The city is settled on Turkish ground. TheMuurtje (talk) 18:21, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sirnak is not a Kurdish city 

message: There are 3 source which all three looks like very biased. The references are also very unknown. Since Wikipedia should stay neutral about his information all time I think this needs to have a look. TheMuurtje (talk) 18:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable references
Talk:Portsdown Hill

message: The prominence figure of 3m is wildly wrong. Jrbray 03:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/the-old-george-inn-portsdown-hill-24816
Need to establish artist date of death though
©Geni 04:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No you don't. The copyright will will be for the reproduction and still current. The painters date of death would only matter if you took the images yourself. Nuttah (talk) 05:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: wikipedia goes by Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.. We (or at least our american friends) do not recognise copyright on reproductions.©Geni 05:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would wait and see how this National_Portrait_Gallery_copyright_conflicts plays out before assuming that is the case. Nuttah (talk) 16:13, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As and when they file a case in a US court I suppose their opinion might be considered by the americans. Untill that point I suspect they feel that the US declaration of independence covers such issues.©Geni 16:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The case is already filed in the UK courts against User:Coetzee - not Wikipedia. The reason it has not been heard yet is the the Wikipedian is a US citizen and civil matters do not allow extradition. Looking at your page I'm guessing that will not apply here. Legal opinion is that the National Gallery will win. Much as in a number of libel cases and the recent superinjunction cases, UK courts are of the opinion that UK subjects are bound by UK law - regardless of where the media is hosted. Nuttah (talk) 16:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh you have evidence of the case against Dcoetzee actualy being filed? That would be an new development. In any case I'm very aware of the surrounding legal issues having had dealings with copyright issues on wikipedia (including those around the Dcoetzee case) for some years. My expirince is that our american friends are quite capable of uploading such images.©Geni 18:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Pic

message: http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/heritage/notorious-portsmouth-housing-estate-which-lasted-only-20-years-1-6883930
©Geni (talk) 12:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Portsdown park source
Talk:Yüksekova District

message: == proposal for merging Gewar and Yüksekova  ==
Yüksekova  and Gawar are the same places, I think Gawar should be merged into Yüksekova.--Hattusili 06:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Yüksekova  and Gawar are the same places, I think Gawar should be merged into Yüksekova.--Hattusili 06:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposal for merging Gewar and Yüksekova
Talk:Midyat

message: I removed (from section "Gallery") the image "File:Midyat Kasri Nehroz 1370326 droste effect Nevit.jpg" which was subtitled/ described as "A picture of plants taken in old town that depicts the Droste effect". It does not show plants in the plural sense, it seems to me, but one plant, one wall, one floor(/maybe step), cloned several times. This IS, if I understand the article "Droste effect" correctly, a demonstration of Droste effect, but what is its relevance for the "Midyat" article? By whom and how was this arranged, composite image made? To me it is very doubtful that it shows a real, in this form existing passageway, as the rocks in the wall and of the ground look exactly identical again and again (look on right side over the arch and at light spot and diagonal line on floor, for example). The subtitle and the placement between ordinary places-photographs suggest this to be a place looking like this in reality somewhere in the town. When looking twice that becomes doubtful and the making of this image or the context of this work of art should be explained. I do not know if this is a picture montage made (by the uploader?) using a photo taken of ONE plant, arch, etc. in Midyat, or if it might be a picture or a very sophisticated kind of sculpture (although I doubt the latter, I think in looking even more closely the potted plant will be reveaveled as every time exactly the same, having been copied, too; not as several, naturally slightly different mini-(olive?-)trees) which is exhibited as a piece of art (which showcases Droste effect) in Midyat. I strongly tend to believe it is a photo-montage using a photo of one picturesque corner seen in Midyat.
The image's file-upload title does not even suggest anything else, only the subtitle-description for the article's gallery is (was) misleading, no idea if intentionally or just from clumsiness. 
So in any case background information should be provided and based on this decided, if that should be in this article or go to the "Droste effect" article or is, unfortunately, not sooo relevant for either of the two, even though the image composer (the uploader?) has produced a nice and nice to look at trick.  
  
Dear uploader, don't be angry if you are the artist, maybe you just have to think of a more correct subtitle/description to justify it to stay in the Midyat article. 
Maybe you are a(n aspiring?) photo artist from Midyat and can so describe it as montage-photo-art from Midyat made using a view of the town...
The way it was subtitled in the article's "Gallery" section it presented itself just as a fake, like something a 'troll' had put there, a prank; or as something that someone has 'smuggled' in because the person is desperate to make people read the "Droste effect" article or to show off their work (the clones-image)... the latter might be o.k., WITH a clear explanation of what it is :-)  ? 
  
2A02:3033:0:757B:1:2:6734:7390 (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  image should be checked
Talk:Beach Blast

message: Should this article be merged with Bash at the Beach, since they were basically the same PPV, just with a tweaking of the name? Hog Wild and Road Wild are merged.76.126.138.82 (talk) 04:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?
Talk:Symbol (chemistry)

message: I don't get it. I'm not to sure about the deffinition of symbols but I wouldn't think they would be used as letters. This doesn't maker sense. It's very mean :P.
-KT-
KT529 19:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atomic Symbols are Letters? 

message: Does anyone know why the symbol for Strontium is Sr? I would have expected it to be St following the convention of most of the other elements.  An explanation in this article would be informative.__DrChrissy (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol for Strontium 
Talk:David States

message: Hi.
This is a fascinating biography, and I realize it is still a work in progress.  I added that tag at the top of the article because, as the article is now written, it does not meet our notability guidelines.  The tag points you to the relevant policies so that you can find out where the article is lacking and fix it.  As it stands however, it is dangerously close to meeting the criteria for speedy deletion.
In case you don't want to dig through policies, here is a quick list of my concerns:
#The article needs to have references to reliable sources
#The article needs to "assert the notability of its subject", in otherwords, why is Mr. Spade immportant?  The article needs to say that, and that staement must be backed up with a source.
#Guessing from your username, I think this may be autobiographical.  Autobiographical articles are discouraged (but of course we have no way of knowing for sure).
The big thing is sources -- multiple published works that are independent of the article's subject which back up each and every statement made in the article.  Get those in the article and the rest will take care of itself. If you really are this article's subject, you should be familiar with the concept of citing sources. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 04:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I've requested a third opinion in this matter.  Perhaps I'm reading the guidelines a little too strictly, but if so it's because I've seen similar articles get deleted, and would like to see this one improved before someone else comes along and nominates it for deletion.  At any rate, I won't add the tag back in just now.  With luck someone will be by in the next day or so to take a look and provide another opinion.  To whoever that is:Please note that most of the discussion has taken place on the user talk pages of User:ONUnicorn and User:Djstates. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 05:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Third opinion: Looks acceptable to me, though it needs to be wikilinked, cleaned up a bit, and hopefully expanded. --Flex 13:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd opinion request 
Talk:Lou Grant (TV series)

message: There was in fact at least one: at one point the staff are worried that management may be mulling deep personnel changes, and Grant points out that sort of thing is typical of news jobs. He says words to the effect that "I once worked at a TV station where the owner just up and fired every one of us one day." This is how MTM ended, and the reason why Grant sought work at the Trib. Laodah 07:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: References to the Mary Tyler Moore Show on Lou Grant
Talk:State of the art

message: What's the source? I'd like to know something more about it. Would it be possible? 31.27.62.81 (talk) 14:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It is indeed rather unclear. Can anybody clarify whether "Executive (1985), Vol. 27, p. 56." is a magazine or the like? Edcolins (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If it can help, I've tried a quick search on Google for "Executive" and various combination of "Executive", "Executive (1985)", "Executive Vol. 27" etc. and nothing brought results. Thanks in advance. 151.68.67.115 (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Executive" quote?
Talk:Clarence Ransom Edwards

message: Army General Henry Ware Lawton was slain in 1899 in the Philippines. He was probably the General Lawton on whose staff officer Edwards served in 1899.  New International Encyclopedia probably contains a typographical error.  Time will tell.  GhostofSuperslum 04:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General he served under 

message: I have re-assessed this as B per the Milhist checklist. I have removed the empty parameters from the references as they only take up space.(I removed 4kb of text) I would recommend a read of WP:LEAD as the current lead is very short. It needs to summarise the article in a couple of paragraphs. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to leave a note on my talkpage. Regards. Woody (talk) 14:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: I see that several sources (which I just cited) refer to Edwards receiving the Silver Star, which would make me think that :Category:Recipients of the Silver Star would be appropriate here. However, the article links to Citation Star, which might be more accurate (I don't know) but which doesn't have its own category. I would appreciate it if someone solves this discrepancy. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver Star
Talk:Henri Dentz

message: Was reading "World War II: Day by Day"  by Anthony Shaw, and noticed a section dedicated to Dentz.  Will Expand the article in the future.  Although Dentz may seem like an obscure figure, figured a WWII General in command of 45,000 soldiers and the Syrian territory is worth having a stub about anyway.  Particularly since combat ensued, and the forces involved were greater than 2 divisions in strength.
Feel free to add anything at anytime.  Thanks..
Cowboy357 04:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you should cite that book as a source within the article. ww2censor 13:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Creator 

message: Where it states, "Most chose to be repatriated to Metropolitan France rather than join the Free French", the term Metropolitan France is just a sly way to avoid stating the truth. Most of the French soldiers chose to return to Vichy France in support of the Germans. This sly revisionism really is endemic throughout Wikipedia and should stop. Just another perfect example how Western historians slyly lie. No wonder why Europe can't ever gets its act together, for it can't ever face its own shameful acts, and so the Middle East continues to pay the price.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.116.50.209 (talk) 22:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metropolitan France 

message: Please add the IPA of name's pronounciation.PropatriamoriPropatriamori (talk) 12:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation
Talk:Christian Troy

message: It's Wilbur's biological father who dies and wills Christian to gain sole custody of Wilbur. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.235.147.164 (talk) 09:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilbur's mother Gina lives! 

message: Christan killed Gina. That makes him a murderer now. Should we add that to his pageShadowWriter (talk) 03:00, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Murderer

message: Wasn't Rebecca, Christian's ex-girlfriend pregnant?? Whatever became of that baby storyline?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.94.143.153 (talk) 06:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebecca's Baby??
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Trödel

message: Username	        Trödel
Total edits             8219
Distinct pages edited	1765
Average edits/page	4.657
First edit	        21:31, 17 January 2005
	
(main)	        2985
Talk	        1273
User	         893
User talk	1155
Image	          26
Image talk	   5
MediaWiki talk	   3
Template	 377
Template talk	 141
Category	  30
Wikipedia	1030
Wikipedia talk	 301
Editcountitis stats generated using Interiot's Tool. Nishkid64 21:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Count 

message: Sorry for the delay in answering this question - I had to finish my In the news responsibility and work was extremely demanding yesterday. --Trödel 21:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on wikitruth and wikipediareview
Talk:Popular Assembly of the Peoples of Oaxaca

message: The state government was repressive AND powerless at the same time? Quite an achievement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.188.143.91 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Content dispute

message: Hi,
You're welcome there,
[ (fr) : 86.208.180.81 14:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons 

message: Hello,
It's a shame Radio APPO isn't mentionned in this article. This radio has an important role to spread the information of the APPO from the beginning of the conflict. If somebody who writes english properly feel like doing it... May be we could create the article radio APPO...
Bye! Ajor 18:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio APPO

message: Congratulations!  APPO is currently the featured article for the Anarchism Portal.  
Marc Mywords 09:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird! The APPO's leaders are linked to the PRD (verifiable fact, see El Universal, Reforma), and have no interest in anarchism... They have an interest in getting the PRD to power, but not in dissolving all power all together. I don't see this as Anarchism material, and quite frankly, the quality of the article is way too low for it to be "featured"... Hari Seldon 14:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article 

message: Is there some reason why uncited material about "thugs and terrorists" seems to be appropriate for this article?  An IP has been adding it back in, without comment or discussion. --nsaum75¡שיחת!‎ 15:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been stable since the article was protected, however why don't you create a user account and help us make it more neutral and balanced.  --nsaum75¡שיחת!‎ 07:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:Terrorist]] & [[WP:NPOV]] 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Jeremy Burns (Charmed)

message: As someone who's never seen the series, I can't provide an educated opinion on how major a character he is. However, given the lack of stand-alone articles on the show's characters, and the fact that Jeremy Burns only appears in two episodes in Charmed's eight-season run, I suggest we merge it into the supporting-characters section of the Charmed article. Consequentially 04:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that such a minor character does not warrant a separate article, and should be merged into the main show article, with his own paragraph.  If the character later becomes important enough that the section becomes too large, it will be simple to split the information back out to a separate page. --NovaSTL 00:13, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:In Old California (1910 film)

message: Is this movie available anywhere? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability 

message: How exactly was this film rediscovered? I don't get what the monument has to do with it. Thanks, Maikel (talk) 07:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refound
Talk:Zac Dawson

message: With phrases like "most talked about . . player" and "outmuscled and outplayed him," this article either needs some serious sources or an edit to bring us up to NPOV standards. I don't know anywhere near enough about the topic to pick up that torch -- hopefully you do. Consequentially 04:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled