lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of PDF software

message: Soda PDF is only in the Multi-platform table w/ a Yes for Mac OS support & Mac OS X in Win. support column.  Yet Soda PDF's article says it supports Windows & nothing else.  If it supported Mac OS in the past, Mac OS X should be moved to the Mac OS col., Yes added to the Win. col., & Soda PDF added to the Win. table.  If it didn't support Mac OS in the past, Soda PDF should be moved to the Win. table.24.123.84.22 (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Seamus M. Slack (talk) 01:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soda PDF errors 

message: # Both "Mozilla Firefox" and "PDF.js" are listed. The PDF viewer included in Firefox is PDF.js, so I see no reason for both to be listed separately. Only PDF.js should be listed, with the note that it is included by default in Firefox. The license for "Mozilla Firefox" also contains the license for the browser in its entirety, not just the PDF viewer.
# "Google Chrome" is listed as it contains a PDF viewer. However, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Chromium also contain the same PDF viewing software? If this is the case, then this should be listed as "Chromium", and its license should be the BSD license, not Proprietary. There can be a note in the description that states that this same software exists in Google Chrome.
SebastianTalk | Contrib. - 16:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate information in "Viewers" subsection? 

message: This page says for Inkscape: “Pages can be later combined using PDF printer”. What is meant by that? I see two ways for getting PDF files from Inkscape: One via Print → Select Printer → Microsoft Print to PDF, the other via Save As. In neither do I see a way to combine pages. ◅ Sebastian 04:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Pages can be later combined using PDF printer” 

message: I came across a source that says that LibreOffice Draw saves PDFs as a Raster Image rather than a true PDF.  Can someone with more knowledge on the subject please check this out?  The info is from the comment from Stuart Foote in the forum linked below.
https://www.libreofficehelp.com/modify-edit-pdf-free-libreoffice-draw/ WPatrickW (talk) 19:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  LibreOffice Description
Talk:Warehouse club

message: In the mid 1970's in Camarillo California, there was a club requiring membership to buy from they had electronics, furniture food and many products.I think it was bought and merged with Harbor frieght or something else.  It was a very large building visible next to Hwy 101 in Camarillo.   This store is not listed in the list of Club Stores here.  Does anyone have references? 66.218.37.253 (talk) 18:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to "Unity Buying Service"
Talk:Divinefire

message: Any big fans might be interested of making it 'flow' a little better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swerty (talk • contribs) 06:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Volunteers

message: # The bold need's to be taken away.
# An overivew of what type of music the band plays, for the first sentance is neccesary to get a grasp of who the band is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swerty (talk • contribs) 06:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work to be done

message: No big fan, just discovered them a week ago thank to a coworker. I discovered the original text was copied from the official site. I just translate my stub on fr.wiki, but I am not a music specialist. Sebjarod 09:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st step

message: I'm not sure they aren't notable enough.  There's some media coverage in Germany, so I'll have a look at other language wikis. Hiding Talk 18:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang on
Talk:CGI.pm

message: I want to know about CGI Scripts like How can they write? what can they do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.145.163.21 (talk) 06:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Oppose proposed deletion. Wikipedia is not a directory of CGI modules, but it should contain articles on the five or so most popular ones. —Lowellian (reply) 20:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Jay Kesler

message: --I would love to get a picture that is under public domain.  If anyone has one, please add it.  Otherwise, I will try to get one eventually.  Please don't copy a picture from another website or Taylor.  I WILL delete copyright infringing images!  Brokenfrog 06:15, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:501(c)(4)

message: The following material has been removed from the main article:
::Unlike the more prevalent 501(c)(3) non-profits, donations generally to a 501(c)(4) are not exempt from payment of federal income taxes (unless it is a volunteer fire department or veteran organizations with at least 90% of their membership consisting of war veterans). The Internal Revenue Code is Title 26 of the United States Code.
I think what the author was trying to say was this:
::Unlike donations to the more prevalent 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations, donations to a section 501(c)(4) organization are not deductible by the donor (as charitable contributions under section 170) unless the recipient organization is a volunteer fire department or veteran organizations with at least 90% of its membership consisting of war veterans.
I will try to check the statutes and regs to be sure that the revised wording is correct, and will then re-insert the corrected material in the article.
The point is: Exemption from Federal income tax under section 501 basically means that the RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION does not have to pay income tax on the portion of its income (generally, the donations it receives) that is related to its "charitable" purpose. By contrast, DEDUCTIBILITY refers to the right of the DONOR to deduct the charitable contribution it PAID (i.e., the other side of the transaction, if you will) as a charitable contribution under section 170. Famspear 06:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To my knowledge the code and regulations do not have the deductibility issues described above.  I do know it is true though.  Check out Rev. Rule 80-77 for the Volunteer fire department and Rev. Rule 84-140 for the veteran’s organization.  If you don't have access to revenue rulings, check out http://www.taxlinks.com/.  It is a free site to read revenue rulings off of.
Since the above described facts are true regarding deductibility, I am going to add it back to the article but also use the suggested language above.  It does make more sense described that way. --Ashay8 05:03, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  501(c)(4) contribution deductibility
Talk:Eugene Habecker

message: --I would like to add biographical information to this page if it is available.  Also, could anyone supply a public domain picture?  Brokenfrog 06:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mitchell Park railway station

message: Hello. The image on this page (i.e.Category:Clovelly Park railway station) is a variant of the same photo in Category:Mitchell Park railway station. Logic would suggest that one of them has to be a mistake... Any ideas??? JabberJawJAPAN talk 08:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok - well it seems that this image here does represent this station, so by inference then, I guess I should indicate on the other page that there seems to be an image problem there... JabberJawJAPAN talk 12:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello again! Ok - the tag/request is back. Given the apparent overhaul of the line/stations (see updated images here), would it be possible to get an updated photo of the station on this page? Thanks again.  JabberJawJAPAN talk 12:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Clovelly Park railway station

message: Hello. The image on this page (i.e.Category:Mitchell Park railway station) is a variant of the same photo in Category:Clovelly Park railway station. Logic would suggest that one of them has to be a mistake... Any ideas???  Thanks. JabberJawJAPAN talk 12:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Image problem
Talk:Tonsley railway station

message: A toxic chemical used as a degreaser and metal cleaner has been detected in bore water in Adelaide's southern suburbs. SA Health and the Environment Protection Authority said today that they were investigating the contamination of ground water at Clovelly Park, after tests had identified the presence of trichloroethene (TCE). [2]. As per the map in the above article, Tonsley railway station is within the contaminated area.
Is this information relevant to this article? This article is about the Tonsley Railway Station, not about water problems in the surrounding areas. Sem boy (talk) 09:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of new section on toxic bore water
Talk:Ascot Park railway station

message: Does anyone know when the current station shelter was provided? Judging from the style I'm assuming it was done in the 2010s, probably sometime when the Noarlunga line was upgraded but I can't find any supporting documents.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebusofdoom (talk • contribs) 23:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station shelter
Talk:Sarpedon

message: thanks to whoever put the vase in the article i couldnt figure out how to do it myself.
: no problem.  I've got some good resources on ancient greek vases - I'm just a little hesitant to upload more than a few.  It's easy to claim 2d art is public domain, but photos of 3d art have copyright protection... so that complicates things.  Which is unfortunate, since basically all surviving ancient greek art is 3d.  A lot of this stuff we can probably claim "fair use", which is what I did with this one.  But I'm going to have to look into the matter some before I go uploading a bunch more.  - Ravenous 07:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled comments 

message: Which are the other two? In this article I see only *one* other besides this one. Namely, the Sarpedon who fought at Troy.
Or does "the other two" mean the grandfather and grandson of the alternate opinion mentioned earlier?
Toddcs (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unlike the other two Sarpedons"
Category talk:Chinese actors

message: I'm going to make a revert of Instantnood's latest edit to this category. .  This category has, for quite awhile before Instantnood came along, been for "Chinese actors", with text specifically stating that it includes Hong Kong.  Instantnood has tried to change this in July 2005 , and then again FIVE TIMES on September 22-23 2005.
It's an interesting behavior of his, that after having revert wars months earlier, he will just wait and come back and make the same exact edit months later.  There is no talk page discussion.  It's uncanny, every day there were be the same old reverts as the day before, and in the middle of those, he throws in one or two ancient ones. 
FWIW, I'm trying to explain my revert without being accused of edit warring. SchmuckyTheCat 06:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The two categories were created at around the same period  .  They coexisted for three months until user:Jihg's edits  . IMHO, they should be kept as separate categories and be linked to each other, since they're subcategories of :category:cinema of China and :category:cinema of Hong Kong respectively, and the cinema of China and cinema of Hong Kong articles are currently arranged to talk about the separate threads of the development of Chinese-language cinema. Instantnood 19:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: reversion, 12 January
Talk:Oaklands railway station

message: As far as I am aware, the vast majority of trains stopped at Oaklands before the platform redevelopment. However, I cannot find an easily-accessible reliable source for this.
122.49.175.100 (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to remember express trains going south through Oaklands in the 1980s, only because as a motorist held up by the boom gates you didn't have to wait while the train stopped, disgorged its passengers and moved on. Maybe only a few minutes but so frustrating! The tramways are far more considerate: they have the up-track stop on one side of the crossing and down-track on the other, so no-one is held up by a stationary tram. Doug butler (talk) 02:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  '...timetable was changed so the majority of trains stoppped...'
Talk:Hove railway station, Adelaide

message: Until the 1990s, Hove station had a ticket office, toilets and an underground pedestrian tunnel, but heavy graffiti and vandalism led to these facilities being closed and demolished
This part is incorrect. The office wasnt demolished, just boarded up and painted over. The underground pedestrian tunnel is still here. Source, I'm here right now and live nearby. 120.20.114.211 (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underground
Talk:List of Tosafists

message: If it is determined that the text is a copyvio, and permission is not granted to use it, keep in mind the text in question refers exclusively to the article lead (the first 2 paragraphs).  Most of the rest of the article is cut and pasted from the online Jewish Encyclopedia's article on Tosafot.  Tomertalk 07:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A word of caution re: copyvio 

message: Does this article merge with Tosafot? --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 03:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Tomertalk 11:21, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge?
Talk:Hallett Cove railway station

message: Hallett Cove Junction was the junction of the Port Stanvac railway (opened May 1963) and the Willunga railway.  Hallett's Cove station (later "Hallett Cove") was beyond (to the south of) the junction; the Wikipedia map of the Willunga line, showing distances, is therefore wrong. A look at the old map shown on the "Willunga railway line" wikipedia entry clearly shows this point.
For several years after the 1969 closure of the Willunga line, the original Hallett's Cove station continued to be used.  The important point is that the stated 1970s Hallett Cove "rebuild" actually involved building a new station on the Port Stanvac line, just 100 metres down the hill from the Willunga line station of the same name.  That then led to the closure of the stub of the railway between the Junction and the old Hallett's Cove station.  
Having switched the suburban passenger operations from the old Willunga line stub to the Port Stanvac branch, it was then possible to (later) extend services to a new station at Hallett Cove Beach (and beyond).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.52.124 (talk) 21:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hallett Cove Beach railway station

message: The shelters at this station look new. Did this station have the same/similar shelters like the ones that Ascot Park and Lonsdale etc have right now? Just interested thats all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhysydude (talk • contribs) 03:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hallett Cove Beach railway station, Adelaide (Shelters)
Talk:Non-Muslim Islamic scholars

message: This article should be merged into Islamic studies by author (non-Muslim or academic). It is proposed that this article be absorbed by that one. That article Islamic studies by author contains about 250 annotated entries, including all but a few listed here. Pending further discussion, no action will be taken until on or after August 5, 2008. Elfelix (talk) 04:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger
Talk:Philadelphia Big 5

message: Do any other cities have anything like this?  If so, they should be linked from this page.  It would be cool if Chicago had it with the following 4-7 teams playing each other once a year and awarding a championship: DePaul, Loyola, UIC, Northwestern, [NIU, Chicago St., and Valpo).
I don't think so. That's why it's considered so unique here in Philly. Bus2Beezlebub (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Cities

message: Drexel isn't considered part of the big 5, they never will be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.162.59.49 (talk) 03:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drexel included in Big 5? 

message: I removed the sentence that said "No city in America has more D-I basketball teams" because it isn't accurate. Philadelphia has five within the city limits: Penn, La Salle, St. Joseph's, Temple, and Drexel. (Villanova is outside the city.) But New York City has seven within the city limits alone: Columbia, Fordham, LIU-Brooklyn, Manhattan, St. Francis, St. John's, and Wagner. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "No city in America has more D-I basketball teams."

message: Villanova's Senior Associate AD/Communications, Dean Kenefick, responded to a Wikipedia editor's inquiry about whether there was a 2020–21 Big 5 champion (Dean Kenefick <dean.kenefick@villanova.edu To:bigredpoolplaya@yahoo.com Sat, May 1 at 10:12 PM; "There was no official Big 5 champion for the 2020-21 season." Brian (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 2020–21 winner
Category talk:Bridges in New York City

message: Should this be used as an example?  I like the links at the top of the category enabling one to select different categories. Cacophony 07:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Classification --Samuel Wantman 07:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I'll make a template to make this easy to add to all fifty states. -- Samuel Wantman 02:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Bridges in New York (state)

message: Why not also include :Category:Bridges in New York City?  Cacophony 07:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree, and it looks like the new guidelines for categorization will allow it.  I suggest talking with User:SPUI because he reverted my including toll bridges in :Category:Bridges in New York City.  Process wise, I think we should agree at the bridge project page, invite SPUI to participate, and make some general decisions about what to do. -- Samuel Wantman 07:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go ahead and make the changes based on the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Categorization and laid out at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bridges#Categorization. Cacophony 21:11, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Roberto Ayala

message: There seams to be a problem with the date of Ayala's birth: even though all sources indicate he was born on April 1973, some say it was on the 12, and others on the 14th. I tryed to get all the reliable sources I could, and found out only these:
*12/4/1973
**Encarta 
**El País 
**Diario As 
*14/4/1973
**Clarín 
**RSSSF 
**FIFA 
**El Mundo 
Since Argentine newspaper Clarin and official FIFA set his birthday on the 14th, I'm restonring that date as valid. Please, don't change it before discussing it here. Mariano(t/c) 07:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Of Birth

message: It'd be nice if a nice Argentinian adds the way his name is pronounced. I've heard it's pronounce Ajala but don't know for sure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yonatanh (talk • contribs) 
:In Argentina, Ayala's surname is usually pronounced Ashala (Ašala), specially in the Rioplatense Spanish dialect. Aiala might be heard in the Northern part of the country, and even Azhala could be used by some more snobish ones. Mariano(t/c) 08:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation of Ayala's name 

message: It is common knowledge that Ayala really doesn't like being called "Roberto", he always addresses himself via his middle name of Fabián, and most Spanish-language papers (ie those that know better) will refer to him as "Fabián Ayala" rather than "Roberto Ayala". Although I have seen a lot of papers spell it out in full, ie "Roberto Fabián Ayala". Can I suggest therefore that the main article be either Fabián Ayala or Roberto Fabián Ayala and that Roberto Ayala be diverted to the correctly titled page? Tris2000 (talk) 12:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberto or Fabián 
Talk:Artane, Dublin

message: Is there really any point in having this section? People are continually adding names of people of no importance whatsoever. It's by far the most vandalised section. And is it really that informative? The information will be available on the article about that person, unless they don't have an article, in which case they don't count as noteworthy.
It's a pointless section in my opinion.
Face-2-face (talk) 22:47, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable People

message: Considered cleaning this up but it's too much work. I'd almost suggest someone assembled the facts, ripped this up, and started over. Someone who knows how to write for once. A disgrace.
Artane is also the trade name of the anti-parkinsonian drug trihexyphenidyl.  I don't know nearly enough to write an article about it, and I'm a WikiPedia newbie, anyway.  I have taken Artane for many years and wish there was some information about it here.
Who is Gary Shore? I can't find any mention of him in web-searches. If no more details or references are going to be given, he will have to go! 83.70.69.17 12:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What a Mess

message: The claim that Johannes de Sacrobosco came from Artane directly contradicts the wikipedia page on Johannes de Sacrobosco (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrobosco), which says he was most likely from Halifax, England.
Further more, it claims his name is Anglicised as John of Holywood (as opposed to Hollywood).
I just wanted to get other people's opinions on the paragraph about John Hollywood. Should it be removed completely? Or is there any sources to support these claims?
The rest of the page badly needs sources, particularly the claim that St.David's is built on the site of Artane Castle. As far as I know, there is a plaque at Artane Castle Shopping Centre saying that the shopping centre is built on the site of Artane Castle. (However, I have no written sources to support this)
Thank You. 
86.42.85.213 20:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johannes de Sacrobosco 
Talk:Wendy Seltzer

message: With the large changes to the W3C as of December 31, 2022, Wendy moved to be the Principal Identity Architect at Tucows. Wendy includes this in her LinkedIn page - https://www.linkedin.com/in/wendyseltzer/ - but I cannot find a reliable source to make the updates to her article page. If someone else can, that would be great. - Dyork (talk) 13:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wendy Seltzer is now at Tucows
Talk:Hinduism in Russia

message: I heard a while back there were Hindus in Siberia.  They were of Mongoloid origin.  A Hindu priest from India went to Siberia and poured a vial of the Ganges in a river.  Wish I save the article. --Dangerous-Boy 07:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hindus in Siberia

message: Who is this 'Mayor Of Russia'? Kapil 15:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayor Of Russia

message: Is a list of the ISKCON and other temples necessary?  We can instead list a number of temples, and maybe their locations if they are needed. Shruti14 ( talk • contribs ) 18:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists

message: Why is ISKCON charged with a 'western interpretation of Hinduism?' ISKCON has a disciplinic succession that can be traced back to Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, and it IS NOT a western creation as these Christians would love to beleive. I think this comment should be taken down, since it is offensive and completely concocted. I read the source material, but nowhere does Mr Kotin mention HOW it is a 'western interpretation'.
The practises of the Hare Krishna movement are quite different from those of mainstream Hinduism, but this difference does not originate in the west, but in fact in India. I see no reason why this man's uninformed opinion should be posted on wikipedia as some kind of fact.
Harrifer (talk) 09:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Western Interpretation?'