lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Citoyenne Henri

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate for this article--and the lady in question--to be titled "Citizeness Henri"?  "Citoyenne" is the feminine form of the word "citizen" in French; compare the usage and the translation at La Citoyenne, a feminist newspaper of the 1800's.  I seem to recall reading of other women who were called Citoyenne this or that during the period of the French Revolution, and in translation are traditionally called "Citizeness," but I can't think of a particular example at the moment.
Regardless of whether it would be politically correct in English-speaking countries at the present time, the distinction of male and female nouns & adjectives is still very much a feature of the French language today; and it seems to me that when referring to people from an earlier period we ought to respect the traditional usage, not impose a modern POV.
Furthermore, it seems completely improper and anglocentric to change the spelling of a last name from "Henri" to "Henry."  There is no reason to change the spelling when using a name already written in a Roman alphabet.  You can find the lady's name in its original form on the French Wikipedia at fr:André-Jacques Garnerin--Textorus 22:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also can't think of any good reason for changing the last name from "Henri" to "Henry". I think that the article should be renamed. -- Asclepias 23:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was merely following the usage in the English language sources, which universally refer to her as Citizen Henry. Yomanganitalk 23:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is moved now, with the translation noted. I haven't added the Citizeness as I haven't seen a single English source with her called that. Yomanganitalk 23:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job on changing the title.  I finally remembered that the most famous example is the notorious Madame DeFarge in Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities; she is routinely referred to as "Citizeness DeFarge."  A google search turns up other examples.  Appreciate your good work on this interesting article.  :-)  --Textorus 03:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender and grammar

message: Do we know this woman's actual name?  "Citoyenne" sounds like a Revolutionary honorific, not a name.  And if her surname was actually "Henri", then it seems very odd that some sources "translate" this to "Henry".  So I'm guessing that neither "Citoyenne" nor "Henri" were part of her actual name.  Is this correct?  If so, the lede should clearly state that this is not her name -- because as it reads now, readers might think it is her name.
If we know her actual name, it should be stated. If not, it should be stated that her name has been lost to history. — Lawrence King (talk) 04:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: French Wikipedia says Célestine Henri.  Anglicization of Henri as surname to Henry would be odd now, but not in 1798. Churchh (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual name
Talk:Epirus water frog

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Benny Trapp Epirusfrosch Pelophylax epeiroticus.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 13, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-07-13. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Benny Trapp Epirusfrosch Pelophylax epeiroticus.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Paco Godia

message: The guy didn't die until 1990, so shouldn't the new Spanish flag be used?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.35.220.163 (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:F1 convention is to use the flag which was in effect when the driver raced in Formula One. DH85868993 (talk) 08:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DC10 (nightclub)

message: Another club that is catering to the daytime crowd that has emerged in the last couple of years is The Zoo Club. I'm mentioning it here for two reasons. First, I'd like to see it have its own article if adequate reliable sources exist to reference it as being notable per Wikipedia standards. The other reason is that perhaps it should be mentioned in this article since both clubs appear to provide a club venue when the other clubs don't? Perhaps I've got some of this wrong? Any feedback is welcome! __meco (talk) 20:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competitor - The Zoo Project 
Talk:Hylarana garoensis

message: Why in the article title is the genus listed in quotes? Is that because the genus is uncertain? The Wikipedia article on the genus Hylarana mentions this uncertainty and cites (poorly) a 2015 study, .  Which says: "Provisional treatment here (version 6.0) due to not being assigned to any of the hylaranine genera by Oliver, Prendini, Kraus, and Raxworthy, 2015, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 90: 176–192". copy here 
Has there been a more recent study that clarifies this issue? I note that other articles published after 2015 that mention Hylarana garoensisdo do not use this "Hylarana" form. See, e.g. "A Checklist of Amphibians of India with IUCN Conservation Status (updated April 2020) and Endemic and endangered fauna of North-East India: present scenario" (2022).   --Bejnar (talk) 19:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Bejnar, it is not the genus that is uncertain, but this species' placement in it. The species has been provisionally placed in the genus Hylarana by the source given (ASW 6.0) until further phylogenetic research can be done. Then the genus placement may be either accepted (and the quotes dissappear), or placed in another (new or existing) genus. See also the "Comment" paragraph on the ASW entry page here. Loopy30 (talk) 21:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus in quotes
Talk:Odorrana graminea

message: : Peer reviewed article - great detail. Added speciesbox and picture Britneys99 (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: This article was updated with sections on: Taxonomy, Vocalizations, Conservation, Diet, Anti-microbial defense, Gut microbiome, and Physiology. The previous article was kept unchanged, but sorted into categories of "Description" and "Habitat and distribution". Frogboi123 (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to article 

message: I made some grammatical edits and changed around some of the sentences. I also added a picture of the frog that I found using the Wikimedia Commons search engine. I think that the article could focus more on the organism Odorrana graminea, but I think that all information presented is relevant and important. I also think that you could add a map that shows the geographic distribution of this frog. Overall great work! ShawnMohammed (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: First of all, great job! The contents of your post are very interesting. I especially liked the specific categorization of the post with the use of sub-sections/headings because it makes the readers easier to locate the information that they might be looking for specifically.
For the Vocalizations section, you introduced the six basic types of calls of the frog, including short tonal call, long tonal call, multi-note call, tonal call with shallow or no frequency modulation, narrow-band call, and staccato call. If you could find more information about each type of call, it would be great if you could make them into subsections and explain each type in detail.
And since the Vocalization section already have subsections (ultrasonic characteristics, auditory sexual differences, nonlinear vocal components, and phonotaxis), maybe you could make a new section for the six basic types of calls and name the section Calling. And the current description of the Vocalization section could be used for the Calling section, and the Vocalization section could have a new description that summarizes the subsections it has.
For the Physiology section, one suggestion is to add a picture of an example of the growth defect, if you could find a picture. Turturenhydra (talk) 11:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review Comments
Talk:Lithobates heckscheri

message: "River frog" can refer to a large number of mostly distantly related frog species (but with some additional qualifiers, such as "Van Dijk's river frog"). It is also the common name for two genera, Amietia and Thoropa. Thus, according to the WP:NCFAUNA the scientific name should be used, or at least, a hatnote should be added. I suggest moving the page. Micromesistius (talk) 07:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In general I would agree with you that this frog should be listed under its scientific name. In this instance that would be problematic as there is controversy as to whether it should be classified as Rana heckscheri or Lithobates heckscheri - see the Taxonomy section. I merely expanded an article called "River frog" and have no strong views as to what the page should be called. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not worry too much about the controversy. Wikipedia is pretty consistent in using Lithobates already, in keeping with the Amphibian Species of the World being the "official" source of taxonomy for this project, as well as what IUCN has adopted. Micromesistius (talk) 07:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to ''Lithobates heckscheri''? 
Talk:Star (automobile)

message: Recently I linked a page with two pictures of a Star automobile which I rode in and photographed a couple of weeks ago. Although the wikipedia entry for the Star automobile has no pictures, the link to my pictures was deleted by a spambot. I don't see why it would be considered spam. The pictures add something to the wikipedia entry on the automobile. I wonder why somebody doesn't review the entries before they are deleted as spam?? Ralph Deeds 22:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Regina Zernay Roberts

message: Merge? Regina Zernay is at the same time in two bands and is the primary.  --Leahtwosaints (talk) 04:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In two bands

message: At the request of Regina Zernay, we removed the last picture of her in the infobox and replaced it with an official publicity photo. --
zeichner-oakes (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo switch
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics/Evidence

message: Nema: this isn't an accusation; I would still be equally content with leaving WHEELER alone, and accepting his recursion in another few months as being as inevitable as the weather. But if ArbCom is to affect the situation, they must, I argue, use their teeth. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this is about my evidence section as it currently stands (a single paragraph introduction), I'm not going to avoid giving evidence, I've got a good chunk of sections, I'm collecting diffs at the moment. I just want to write an evidence-plus-commentary contribution rather than a rant-with-evidence. --Nema Fakei 22:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah, I see that you interpreted my paragraph as a direct criticism of your evidence presentation. Not intended as such. --Nema Fakei 10:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood. Ah well, just as well to say that I don't mind if WHEELER is permitted just to go away again. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on evidence
Talk:Beef bun

message: Is it also eaten in any part of China other than HK? Badagnani 17:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since you can find essentially anything in China, I guess it could be consumed. But this is like saying sushi is consumed in the US.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.75.181 (talk) 01:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: China?
Talk:Theophilus of Edessa

message: I don't think the passage quoted in the article comes from the Chronicon Ecclesiasticum of Bar Hebraeus.  Perhaps the Chronicon Syriacum or one of his other works?
I have tagged it for a citation, and would be interested to know where the passage does come from.
Djwilms (talk) 02:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life of Theophilus 

message: I've added :Category:8th-century Byzantine people because Theophilus is being characterized as a Greek person in the body text and this category is the best fitting category for medieval Greek people. However, while I'm also reading the German translation, I'm not so sure if Greek is actually the right characterization of Theophilus. Shouldn't it become Syrian instead? Marcocapelle (talk) 18:26, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek
Talk:Bathurst Street (Toronto)

message: "The roadway continues north into York Region where it is known as York Regional Road 38."
It is known as Bathurst Street, even in York Region - that is outdated
hillelfrei• talk • 15:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect quote 

message: Beginning in 2000, large numbers of Filipino migrants settled at the intersection of Bathurst and Wilson, many living in low rise apartments located in that area. An annual "Taste of the Philippines" festival has been held at or near that intersection. BobMcK (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipino Community at Bathurst and Wilson
Talk:Ichthyosporea

message: Comment here. Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 23:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this article should be renamed to Ichthyosporea because it is the name preferred by the most recent scientific literature. --kupirijo (talk) 11:04, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: nature.com has this article on fossils with similarities to this form. If someone can link the research paper here, that would be good.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.135.151 (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible fossils

message: Unicellular or multicellular? Bwrs (talk) 10:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  question? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 22:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mesomycetozoea →  – I think it is pretty obvious that Ichthyosporea is the preferred name used for this taxonomic group, especially in the last decade. Almost all literature regarding Holozoan taxa describes it as Ichthyosporea, not Mesomycetozoea. It also is the oldest name and therefore has preference. Consensus can be seen in here at WP:TOL. This is a contested technical request (permalink). —Snoteleks 🦠 13:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Moreover, Mesomycetozoea is wikilinked a total of 78 times while Ichthyosporea is linked 148 times. —Snoteleks 🦠 11:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Support. The article was created soon after Mendoza's review and it seemed a reasonable proposal for a class that was not just fish parasites, but twenty years later the name clearly hasn't caught on. For once a Cavalier-Smith name survives. —  Jts1882 | talk  12:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly I was surprised by how many names from Cavalier-Smith are retained in the ISP's eukaryote revision of 2019. Even though his higher classification is pretty much rejected, he named so many new lower taxa in groups like excavates, podiates and rhizarians that he is still very present. —Snoteleks 🦠 12:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I have copied the above comments here from WikiProject Tree of Life. SilverLocust 💬 22:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 August 2023
Talk:J. David Singer

message: This article reads more like a glowing biography than an encyclopedia entry.  It also lacks any sources.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack2018 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs sources 

message: I have reverted this article to an early version, because all of the text added by User:141.211.206.61  was a blatant copy of Singer's page at UMich . --dave pape (talk) 13:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: I just reverted an anon. editor, who had added that Singer died Dec. 28, 2009. No source was provided and I couldn't confirm that information via Google search. Since we've had "pranksters" make such changes to other articles, and because of the WP:BLP policy, we shouldn't add such information until it is verifiable by other editors. Apparently, Ann Arbor does not have a local paper anymore, so first verification is likely to come through the University. Studerby (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dec. 28
Talk:J. David Shapiro

message: Shapiro coauthored an illustration book in 2014 with atheist activist Joey Lee Kirkman titled "Bedtime Bible Stories - Explicit", which is sold on Amazon and at atheist conventions.
Sir Sanjuro (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Shapiro wrote a book

message: This article continues to  read like a condensed AUTObiography; clearly it was written by someone in Shapiro's camp, if not Shapiro himself. Lots of trivial info in here and it STILL does not cite any sources. Deriobamba (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jakeshapiro and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jakeshapiro/Archive. -- Cirt (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article POV
Talk:J. Delano Ellis

message: On September 22, 2020 an edit war ensued between administrative staff, another contributor, and I pertaining to restoring referenced information which was removed by the said contributor who shall not be named in an effort to focus on this important matter (though of course, they are free to comment whenever they are able to). The information removed pertained to rescued news articles regarding the certification (but not ordination or consecration, as evident in the citation) of a homosexual bishop named O.C. Allen, who leads the Vision Church of Atlanta, Georgia. Other information removed pertained to J. Delano Ellis being a freemason. From the discussions held on numerous discussion pages—from administrative noticeboards to personal discussion pages—the reasoning found behind this appeared to be personal. Thus, as a result of the previous event I would like to clarify that as J. Delano Ellis is a public figure, and when citations are involved it is best to leave them within the article, whether it seems to glorify or degrade. According to the linked information, "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it." - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 15:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the removal of information on a [[w:public figure|public figure]] 

message: Please remove the line requested below as Bishop O.C. Allen was not admitted to the College of Bishops under J. Delano Ellis leadership:
The Joint College of Bishops also teaches a five-fold ministry. J. Delano Ellis and the Joint College of African-American Pentecostal Bishops denounced Carlton Pearson as a heretic for teaching Christian universalism.[30][31][32] Under Ellis's administration, the Joint College of Bishops also admitted and certified gay bishop O.C. Allen of the Vision Church of Atlanta in 2012.[33][34][35][36] GoVaughn (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The statement in the article appears reasonably well-sourced.  Any request to remove it should be accompanied by sources at least as reliable. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 October 2020
Talk:Kathy Mar

message: I hope I've established "notability"... Kathy Mar's music is very well known in filk circles, and it just doesn't seem right for the wiki entry to say "Not Notable".
If the page still doesn't meet "notability" guidelines, what would be needed to meet them?  I can't see how Kathy Mar would not be considered notable if filk is going to be covered at all.
Mikevp 23:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I gave up Wikipedia editing years ago as too stressful, with the resolution staff severely overworked, but here are some notes for improving the article:
Remove the "only" from the Filk Hall of Fame mention. That's an evaluation, not a fact.
Is it really appropriate to mention people's children by name in an article of this type? Likewise the information about Dean gets more personal than is appropriate.
"She has appeared as filk GoH at almost every filk convention" is wildly false. Perhaps this is intended to say that many filk conventions have had her as a GoH at least once?
-- Gary McGath, August 31, 2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.137.165 (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes for improvement 
Talk:Appalachian Voices

message: User:66.21.143.96 is adding large numbers of irrelevant and unnecessary categories. I have removed some on two occasions. See Wikipedia:Categorization#Guidelines. Alan Liefting 23:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant categories

message: The text of the article — primarily contributed by  — was copied from the About page on the organization's website.
Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines such as Neutral point of view and Conflict of interest apply.  Posted on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Appalachian Voices.  — Athaenara  ✉  23:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Postscript:  The article was deleted (log).  — Athaenara  ✉  03:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article text copied from organization website

message: New article erected on oct-18-2007 after old one was deleted due to copyright.D-rew 22:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Article

message: I cited the Appvoices site when it their policy was stated.  I don't believe this was against wiki policy, but it was removed...opinion?D-rew (talk) 02:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Karl Selter

message: This article presents a distorted view of Selter. Estonia and Selter were victims of Soviet aggression in Moscow in 1939. The fact that Selter got sucker punched by Stalin and Molotov in the Kremlin when he went to discuss trade but was presented with an ultimatum instead was hardly the crowning glory of his career. It might have been the most pivotal moment in his life, but hardy what he was happy to see or famous for in a positive sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.147.226 (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oregon Constitutional Convention

message: It says the Free Blacks ballot proposition was defeated and that the proposition put forward the question of banning free blacks from Oregon.  Then it says that the vote was ~8,000 to ban, ~1,000 not to ban.  This seems contradictory and there is no weblink that I can check the source from.Mbisanz 16:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Was a typo, now corrected. Vote was to allow free Blacks to live in Oregon and it was defeated, but never enforced. Sadly the measure remained in the Constitution until the 1920s. Aboutmovies 16:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Free Blacks

message: *JSTOR 1
*JSTOR 2
:Not free access. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources for expansion 

message: Signatures of all participants, from Gaston's Centennial History:  -Pete (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image to include?