lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Marty Sampson

message: Marty is a really talented song-writer, with his most recent "Deeper" a great anthem of prayer for more intimacy with the King of Kings, the Lord Jesus Christ!
I agree, but let's have a little more NPOV huh?
71.141.139.75 23:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: cleaned up. --Scott Davis Talk 11:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the article has potential, but it is prone to POV. Also, it currently does not have much information. I think it might be best to redirect this page to List of Hillsong musicians. If more NPOV material can be mustered up, it could have its own article again. Marky1981 21:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the text of my AfD vote: Hillsong has had several albums released. If the author can build up the discography for this entry and demonstrate that the subject has contributed significantly to the released albums,  then it qualifies; otherwise, delete. I'm putting this here in order to hopefully prompt the article's creator to research the album issue, and create a Wikipedia-style discography section, if applicable. Akradecki 22:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion vote 

message: The result of this AfD discussion was keep but cleanup.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   16:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marty Sampson]] 

message: I'm using these tools to help fix this article.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 10:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've improved the article a little and believe it is now at Start class.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:25, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikitools to help fix article
Talk:John Hickenlooper

message: I am filmmaker Ben Makinen. COI: I have produced and directed two documentary films in which John Hickenlooper appears while he was still serving as Governor of Colorado. I am hopeful that editors will agree that the addition of a few simple facts pointing to his participation in these films is of biographical relevance. I am very new here and am attempting to stay safely within all guidelines. Please help me to accomplish what is just and right. Below I am going to add six references. Also please forgive any formatting errors in the request below, this is my first one: let me know how to make proper corrections, thanks. I am not familiar with the preferred formatting of the Filmography entries; but here Hickenlooper has been given an "In popular culture" subheading. Perhaps an editor will choose to start a new Filmography section and add JazzTown while also bringing in his other film credit (Casino Jack) currently listed "In popular culture"?
* Specific text to be added or removed: ==Filmography==
*(2021) JazzTown by Ben Makinen: Governor of Colorado
*(2022) Who Killed Jazz by Ben Makinen: Governor of Colorado
* Reason for the change: of biographical relevance
* References supporting change: https://www.denver.org/blog/post/filmed-in-denver/
http://libraries.colorado.edu/record=b12773212~S3
http://libraries.colorado.edu/record=b12773186~S3
https://www.westword.com/music/filmmaker-and-drummer-ben-makinen-wins-awards-for-documentary-jazztown-13372450
https://coloradomusic.org/want-to-watch-jazztown-the-award-winning-movie-by-ben-makinen-heres-how/
https://www.allaboutjazz.com/member-ben-makinen
*External References
*Music documentary, jazz, Colorado, USA JazzTown IMDb
*Music documentary, socio-economics, jazz, Colorado, Bali Who Killed Jazz IMDb
Benmakinen (talk) 14:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Declined, see my comment here . Actualcpscm (talk) 18:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senator John Hickenlooper is in two new music documentary films titled JazzTown, and Who Killed Jazz
Talk:OAG (disambiguation)

message: Hi, I started this dispute over the OAG entry's neutrality because the article comes off more as an advertisement than an encyclopedia and was presumably written by an employee of OAG. All of the facts could be true (I'm sorry I don't have the time right now to check), or they may not be. At any rate this entry should be transcribed from the first-person plural to the third-person singular. Corporal Clegg 23:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OAG might also be referring to Open Applications Group, i e www.oagi.org .
The Open Applications Group, Inc. (OAGi) is a not-for-profit open standards group building process-based XML standards for both B2B and A2A integration.  The Open Applications Group was formed in late 1994 as the first post-EDI organization focusing on improving the state of application integration.
One output from OAG is OAGIS, i e Open Applications Group Integration Specification. ~
CeeJay4Fun 10:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OAG = Open Applications Group
Talk:Croppies Lie Down

message: I have been to many Orange Parades and NEVER heard ANY song being sung.  Tunes are played by bands.  They do not sing.
: Being played by bands at Orange parades can hardly make this song, of all the songs they play, especially notorious. I have replaced that claim with a statement to the effect that "croppies lie down" is used by republicans to symbolise a perceived loyalist desire to continue the oppression. - Paul 18:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've not heard it sung, for what that's worth. I also toned down some un-encyclopaedic language. I would say that "glory[ing] in the brutal suppression of the rebellion" would be more "yo ho ho we killed their babies" - and the song, while clearly partisan, is not at that level - so we're back to "celebrates... suppression", which IMO is less polemical and more encyclopaedic. You can keep "menacingly" for the last verse though. Reading the lyrics, there does seem to have been brutality in Irish society at the time. - Paul (talk) 06:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Louis Jolliet

message: Would it be appropriate to put a link to the Joliet, Illinois portal, seen as how Joliet is named after him? ataricom 15:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to Joliet, Illinois portal? 

message: What in the world is "a Pernt Turnts" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.5.250 (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pernt Turnts? 

message: There was some Vandalism with this IP In many Pages, Now that it should be understood that this comp. is used by many kids grade 7,8 and 6 - user  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.116.202.43 (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Vandalism 
Talk:Key Peninsula

message: In which country is this peninsular? 84.130.116.227 23:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pierce.  added link. Pfly 16:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, read as 'county' not 'country'.. added another link! Pfly 06:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Working in a direct mail house, I see lots of Gig Harbor-ish addresses with "KPN" in them. Does this stand for "Key Peninsula", or does it mean something else? Thanks.--SarekOfVulcan 01:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Key Peninsula North", I believe, as there is also KPS; either can also be KN or KS.  Pierce County also uses FI and AI for Fox Island and Anderson Island, if I recall.. along with N, S, E, W, NW, SE, etc etc..  Pfly 03:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  KPN addresses 

message: The Key Peninsula  is home to two State Parks, which should be mentioned in the article. 71.227.254.181 06:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Parks 

message: Not very politically correct to call residents of the Key Peninsula "hicks."  The peninsula is a varied and interesting place.  The town of Home has significance for its history as a free-thinking Socialist society at the turn of the (last) century.
A discussion of whether or not meth is made on or brought to the KP is irrelevant without references.  Wikipedia is not a slander site, so residents of both Gig Harbor and the KP need to knock it off by fighting back and forth on the KP Wiki Page.  If it is not going to be factual information, but rather hearsay and opinion, then it needs to be left off folks.
Sorry mate but its a widely known fact that methamphetamine is both distributed and manufactured on the key peninsula. 
Everyone is too twacked out to search for references or they spend all of their income on meth so that they cant afford news papers, magazines, public health notices, or the internet.
as for me i smoke too much meth to care  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.130.24 (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hicks and Meth

message: — Assignment last updated by 7ommybo1228 (talk) 07:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Online Communities
Talk:Automotive head unit

message: Who made the  first head unit ever?
:Motorola, I believe. -- Mikeblas 23:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed Fosnez 15:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've restructured the article to emphasise what information relates to automotive audio head units, and tagged it for expansion on non-automotive information. I've also seen use of the term 'head' to describe the analogous part of a digital tachograph unit, so I don't know if there is room for further expansion outside of audio units. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 12:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Except the very first sentence (introduction) the whole article is about (automotive) head units. For disambiguation purposes, I am going to move the article to the name automotive head unit.--BSI (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-automotive head units 

message: I sort of need a "proof" on the definition so I could show it somewhere else for the sake of an argue. Can somebody help me with that, please? 81.89.66.133 (talk) 09:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for the definition?
Talk:German South West African Mark

message: This article doesn't seem to be consistent in the dates quoted, and the phrasing is enigmatic, which may be the real problem. It cites only one reference, the Standard Catalog of World Paper Money, and probably all we need is for someone with good English and a copy of that reference (which only an expert is likely to have) to take a few moments to clear up the phrasing. Andrewa (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert needed
Template talk:Antarctic territorial claims

message: Brazil doesn't actually make a claim on Antarctica. And where is the evidence that South Africa did? Astrotrain 23:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I added these things in 3 different edits, so that you don't revert all at once and only the appropriate. Reasons for add - in changes history. Alinor 13:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Brazil claim is INFORMAL, so it has no legal value. It is only a 1986 suggestion by the then ruling government in Brazil. Is this suggestion still supported by the current government? Hard to be sure, because they don't have to "denounce" it officialy, because it was informal in the first place. Also this "informal" claim was made AFTER Brazil already signed the Antarctic Treaty, of course without recognising claims already made, but WITHOUT whitholding the right to make a claim in the future (as US/USSR did). And wait, now I readed this in the article: "was never an official Brazilian government position, but it was widely accepted by Brazilian geopoliticians". So this "informal claim" is not even informal - there is no such thing. This is only a wishfull thinking between some people (albeit "geopolititians") in Brazil. If we start this way we should maybe add every nation that has research stations - if some of its people think that this is "our place" (the station). I think that we should remove the "informal" category. Alinor 08:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  And I would insist instead to include USA and Russia, because they are the last states (not counting non-signatories to the ATS) that MAY make some claim. The reasons for excluding them are that they have not done so till now and that this is only a navigational template to lead to appropriate articles (and general Russia/USA articles are not appropriate, I agree. It is better to have some explanatory info about their antarctic claim-right reserve - reasons for them to ask such thing, reasons for the others original signatories to accept this WHITOUT reciprocial right-reserve for them, etc.) Alinor 08:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA, RU, USA, links 

message: I can find no evidence of any South African claim. I can find no evidence of any Brazilian claim, until such evidence is found, and actual articles exist for these claims- they can't appear on the template. The possibilities of such claims cannot be discussed in a template. Astrotrain 17:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazil, South Africa

message: I wasn't aware that Sweden had made territorial claims in Antarctica. Can anyone provide documentation for this? -- Nidator T / C 11:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden 

message: As Australia has the various named territories included in this template under the main Australian Antarctic Territory article, I have added Queen Elizabeth Land under the British Antarctic Territory article. Dunarc (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Queen Elizabeth Land to template
Talk:Clarence Hill (murderer)

message: disambiguating Joe 23:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Saint Joan of Arc (book)

message: First off, there is a need for Wikipedia articles on the major works related to Joan of Arc. But, I can't say that I am entirely satisfied with this, even though it is my own effort. 
Other Wikipedia pages on books, after the introductory material related to the book's nature and publishing history, might provide a plot summary. In the case of a biography, this makes little or no sense. Therefore, I have attempted at least the beginnings of a synopsis of the book's reception as seen in published reviews or critiques of historians and other scholars. This, rather than a review per se, seems appropriate. I just think it could be improved.
Are there any Wikipedia guidelines for such things? I couldn't find them.
JFPerry 00:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia guidelines for book pages

message: I find that horribly unfair.  Now I don't particularly have an opinion on the Trans or Cross-Dressing aspects.  But as far as evidence Jeanne was attracted to women.
The critics are the ones far more ignorant of how things different back then.  It is only a modern perspective that says Lesbians can't be Virgins.  "therefore any theory proposing a lesbian context to their statements would need to explain how they could be describing lesbian sex while simultaneously saying that Joan didn't have sex at all." Because there is a long History of Lesbian sex not counting as Sex. Heck I have seen even modern Lesbian erotic call the girls "Maidens".  That's why there is so much Marina imagery in Yuri Anime and Manga.
And what Sackville emphasizes when pointing out that Joan slept with girls isn't even that she preferred sleeping with girls to men.  But that she slept with young girls rather then older women.  Whether she actually did anything with them or not, it's suspicious she'd have that preference.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 02:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Two years later and the page is no better. Ironically, the page about Joan of Arc's sexuality, cross-dressing, and gender identity, which links to this one, points out that people in the 15th century would have had no concept of sex that didn't involve a penis − which would have allowed for Joan to sleep with women and still be "chaste".--97.90.240.34 (talk) 20:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm offended this page spends mroe time criticising the theory then just telling the reader what it is.
Talk:Áed Find

message: It seems highly unlikely that A. (d.778) married a daughter of C. (d.820, and his brother Óengus died in 834). Indeed, going by Eochaid IV of Dalriada, it would mean that E. married his maternal grandfather's sister. The Bannerman argues in a piece in Spes Scotorum for C. & O. being the grandsons of A.'s brother Eochaid III of Dalriada. I don't credit this myself, but if true it would make the whole thing completely unlikely. But even throwing out Bannerman's idea, as I do, the dates alone make the idea that A. (or E.) married a daughter of C. all but impossible, although it's possible, just, that E. married a sister of C., but she would certainly not have been C.'s heir given that he had brother(s), son(s) and nephew(s). Angus McLellan 00:11, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aedh & Caustantín & Eochaid IV

message: While fiddling with Dál Riata, I was checking into Aed's battle with the Picts in 768. This appears to be accepted as certain by e.g. Bannerman, but looking at the Annals it does seem rather dubious:
*AU 768.7 Bellum i Fortrinn iter Aedh & Cinaedh. (A battle in Foirtriu between Aed and Cinaed.)
*AM 763.7 (for 768) Iomaireacc etir Laighnibh budhdhéisin .i. eitir Cionaedh, mac Flaind, & Aedh, i Foirtrinn, in ro marbhadh Aedh. (A battle was fought between the Leinstermen themselves, namely, between Cinaech, son of Flann, and Aedh, at Foirtrinn, where Aedh was slain.)
I have no idea about the Áed who is slain might be, Áed's and Leinster kings are both two a penny. IIRC, AClon mentions a "Hugh mac Flynn" at about this time. Cináed mac Flainn was indeed busy fighting in Leinster until his death in 770. He appears again in AM 765.12, where he's killed. He's mentioned on p. 157 of Byrne's Irish Kings and High-Kings. Any thoughts ? Angus McLellan 12:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The battle in 768
Talk:Prange Way

message: I am going to change some of the info related to Rockford and Machesney Park, IL - the Prange Way stores did not become Younker's locations. The Prange's did, but the Prange Ways were separate, distinct stores located elsewhere in the malls. PeteJayhawk 18:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockford-area locations
Talk:Mint julep

message: isn't pewter toxic?
--Originally unsigned comment by User:64.180.239.117
:Not necessarily.  Pewter may contain lead, but rarely does anymore.  -- stubblyhead | T/c 22:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't say I'm offended, but this is a common problem. Check out, for example, the Hurricane (cocktail) article, which has a photo of the drink being served not in a Hurricane glass but in a plastic cup! By all means do take a photo and contribute it. I find it a pain submitting photos and haven't done as much of it as I should. Rees11 (talk) 23:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Julep cups

message: How can a play written in 1845 support the claim that the julep was first written about in 1765? —C.Fred (talk) 18:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1765? 

message: Copyright violation, please do not revert edit, much of the material in this article is copyrighted and must be removed per u.s. copyright office chapter 5, circular 92, section a. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1:c6e1:bdc1:a87f:c0e0:e4d:cac (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2018‎ (UTC)
:Much of the material you removed was direct quotations. Since the latest of the two sources was from 1805, I challenge the claim that it's still under copyright. —C.Fred 7(talk) 17:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Your book was published before 1805? That would imply you're at least 220 years old, and that just doesn't make sense. —C.Fred (talk) 18:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

text: And actually, the source was an 1803 book, not 1805. —C.Fred (talk) 18:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged copyvio
Talk:Oubliette

message: My trusty Bloch & Wartburg (French etymological dictionary) is the source for that earliest reference in French; at which point it becomes irrelevant what Benvenuto Cellini wrote, especially since the Italian word is segreta — oubliette is not in use in Italian — and thus I'm almost certain that oubliette is the word used by the English translator, which also, by the way, means 19c or not much earlier. So, although I'm loath to get rid of a nice story and the mystique of Mr. Cellini, it's not germane to the article. Bill 00:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Here is a copy of Dictionnaire historique de la langue française, 3 volumes, a reference for French etymology. Below is the entirety of the entry—after reading it, I think that the grain storage thing I added myself may be wrong. Read on (original French text available on request:
Perhaps you picked up somewhere that a former grain storage was used as an obliette. Wandalstouring 16:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of the word oubliette 

message: I suggest to merge oubliette and immurement into one article on medieval high security imprisonment, implying slow death of the captive or something like that. Wandalstouring 21:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to keep it separately. They seem to be somewhat distinct in that an oubliette is designed specifically for execution/torture, whereas immurement is done during building construction. See alsos at the bottom of both pages would be appropriate, of course, and those are there.--Chaser T 21:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I propose merging the content of this page (at least as far as it is appropriately verified]) into Dungeon. They cover very similar ground. Cyclopaedic (talk) 16:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that's unanimous then. Cyclopaedic (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No longer, I fear! I found this article via Adeliza de Borgomanero, and it was very useful to find out quickly what was meant, rather than to wade through a much mre general article. Ian Spackman (talk) 00:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well Wikipedia is not a dictionary but I do plan on defining oubliette up front in the lead of the merged article. Articles should be about topics, not words, and there is insufficient difference between a dungeon and an oubliette to make them separate topics. Thanks for the input - I was getting lonely here.Cyclopaedic (talk) 08:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As my main contribution seems to have been to fight off people inserting trivia lists into this article (specifically from the Labyrinth movie), I'll be kind of glad to see it go :) Which is not to say that I disagree with the merge, I think that it does make a lot of sense that it should be a sub-topic of Dungeon. So you're not alone, I just didn't find anything to disagree with... Ryanjunk (talk) 14:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Dungeon]]
Talk:Axis of good

message: What is wrong with "undermine"?  Chavez's goals include the formation of multi-national agreements which provide alternate economic, military, etc. agreements that exclude the US and emphasize its opponents.  Whether this is good or bad is irrelevant; it is an attempt to "undermine" in any valid sense of the word.  The protestation is silly.  --TJive 00:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Removed part about Cuba in the Axis of Evil. They aren't.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.47.50 (talk) 03:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cuba 

message: The term "axis of good" is seldom used. A google search finds only a handful of references to Chavez's speak. Most other google results show usage of the term for completetly different things (for example, Algeria distancing itself from Islamic terrorism, or Japan's collaboration with Western militaries).
So I plan to expand the "Axis of good" section in the [Axis of Evil] article, and make this one a redirect (in effect merging the two articles). I'll wait a few days for feedback. -- Gabi S. (talk) 18:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable