lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/PastorMatt

message: User:PastorMatt
    run at Mon Jan 7 02:45:46 2008 GMT
Mainspace              122
Talk:                  21
Template:              7
User talk:             6
User:                  6
Wikipedia:             21
avg edits per page     2.18
earliest               16:22, 11 March 2006
number of unique pages 84
total                  183
2006/3   4
2006/4   0
2006/5   2
2006/6   0
2006/7   0
2006/8   2
2006/9   0
2006/10  2
2006/11  0
2006/12  3
2007/1   1
2007/2   0
2007/3   0
2007/4   23
2007/5   20
2007/6   4
2007/7   6
2007/8   14
2007/9   6
2007/10  68
2007/11  9
2007/12  12
2008/1   7
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
           Mainspace
11 WGSR-LP
10 Odell School, North Carolina
6  WAME (Miami)
6  North Carolina Highway 73
4  WLCM (Lancaster)
4  WADE (AM)
4  WGIV
4  WYFQ
4  North Carolina News Network
3  WQMG-FM
3  WLNK
3  WRFX-FM
3  WGTL
3  Underground
3  WPAW
             Talk:
5 Bible Broadcasting Network
5 WGSR-LP
2 Odell School, North Carolina
    Template:
3 Charlotte Radio
2 Charlotte AM
    User:
6 PastorMatt
                    Wikipedia:
5 Requests for adminship/PastorMatt
3 Articles for deletion/Gilwood Presbyterian Church
2 WikiProject Christianity/Members
2 Administrator intervention against vandalism
2 Third opinion
2 Requests for page protection
2 WikiProject Television Stations
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 02:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for PastorMatt
Talk:John Buscema/Archive 2 (2007 -RFC)

message: Not to be rude, but all of the images on this page are copyrighted.  While two or three might be Fair Use, but a page full of them is pushing it. Burzmali 16:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats not rude at all. But do you mind being a little more specific, like which ones are copyrighted.Phoenix741 19:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard of a comic book going public domain, so I would assume all of the comic book images are copyrighted.  Clicking on any of them takes you to their image page showing the Fair Use guidelines.  As I said before, I think a few examples of his work could be justified, but loading the article with copyrighted images of questionable purpose over runs fair use. Burzmali 19:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well i am not fully sure on this, but i think since they are published works and we are giving credit to who made them, it is ok.Phoenix741 19:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They also have to contribute significantly to the article (point #8 under Policy) and not just be their for decoration. I would take this to mean that one issue in the article should not have more than one image supporting it, but one image may support multiple issues. But if there are images here that ultimately only serve as decoration, they should go, properly attributed or not. — J Greb 20:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why I didn't slap a copyvio template on the page or anything.  Some of the images are okay, but I don't really know enough about the topic to make the call on which should go. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Burzmali (talk • contribs) 02:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Those are Public Domain not Fair Use.  Seeing as most of this gentleman's work was done in the latter half of the 20th century, I doubt much have been released into public domain. Burzmali 13:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You wrote that you had never heard of a comic book going public domain; I provided a link to some that apparently have. CovenantD 19:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me, I misspoke, I meant going public domain voluntarily.  Going PD because your copyright ran out is a different matter entirely.  Burzmali 21:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for entering into the discussion. One quick point: Links to commercial sites such as catalogs are disallowed by Wikipedia. That's not a matter of discussion, but a strict policy. --Tenebrae 03:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

text: A strict interpetation of WP:FU would indicate that, aside from the head shot, all of the images violate Fair Use.  Specifically Comic Covers can be used "to illustrate: the issue of the comic book in question; the periodical comic book series of which this issue is a part; or the copyrighted comic book character(s) or group(s) on the cover of the issue in question;" which is not the topic this article is addressing. Burzmali 16:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Copyright Violations
Talk:White America (song)

message: maybe someone should write an entry for this who is older than 10. just a suggestion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.205.8 (talk) 22:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: in the beggining of the music video, there's various bloods clothing including red shirts, 5 pointed stars, the number 5 itself and 5 triangles(if you count the background color of the radioactivity jacket). is it worth adding?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JF Razor2.0 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if this has been discussed in reliable sources in a way that makes it clear that this is a significant aspect of the video. Do such sources exist?-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloods?
Talk:Novi Plamen

message: I discover with some surprise that my name (David Graeber) is listed as an editor for this journal. This is completely untrue.
I am quite sure that Chomsky and Albert have nothing to do with it as well. I think this is some sort of scam.
'Well, how do you then explain the fact that Albert's, Graeber's and Chomsky's names are mentioned in the article on the magazine on ZNet - which is edited by Albert, and Chomsky and Graeber are its well-known contributors?! This is a shameless accusation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.100.214 (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Why Me (Kris Kristofferson song)

message: Lyrics Blog (apparently a blacklisted site) credits Anthony St Aubyn Kelly, Orville Burrell, and Rickardo George Ducent as the "Songwriters." I don't know how reliable the source is. My guess is that it's not very, hence I'm not adding it to the article. 108.246.205.134 (talk) 03:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Wrote It? 
Talk:St Columba's College, St Albans

message: Sacha Baron-Cohen - was born two years after me - maybe he did attend, but I don't remember him (I was at Sacred Heart and Columba's all the way through). His bio says he went to Haberdasher's.
(Although I was at St.C's when Sacha was born, I believe he went to the prep school for a couple of years. JHvW 00:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sacha Baron-Cohen

message: I cannot see any reason why the section about the school's cadet force has been created as the separate St columbas college CCF article. This is unwarranted and the CCF article should be merged back into the section within the school's article. ~ 204.104.55.244 (talk) 13:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: St columbas college CCF
Template talk:USN fighters

message: I noticed that many of the templates in :Category:United States Navy aircraft designations navigational boxes are titled "USN/USMC ####### designations pre-1962", but this navbox is titled "USN fighter designations pre-1962"... I thought some of those fighters were indeed used by the Marine Corps. Am I wrong, or was that just an oversight? bahamut0013♠♣ 00:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: I've become increasingly convinced that evidence of the existence of a Navy aircraft designated "FN" is apocryphal and may be an example of citogenesis. Joe Baugher claims that the single Seversky NF-1 test aircraft never received a Navy designation or serial number, that it was operated by the Navy under civil registration, and that "NF" was a company designation that stood for "Naval Fighter." Snippets from Seversky histories in publicly searchable databases generally agree, although this seems to be where the NF/FN muddle starts. United States Navy Aircraft since 1911 by Swanborough and Bowers hardly discusses the aircraft at all and never says that it (or Seversky as a company) received a designation. Regarding the NAF, Wings for the Navy: A History of the Naval Aircraft Factory, 1917-1956 by Trimble doesn't discuss the NAF having ever embarked on a post-WWI fighter project, much less one that proceeded far enough to receive a formal designation, and given the NAF's controversial history as it relates to private industry, my hunch is that any such project would have been quashed because it would step on too many toes (being small, light and simple single-engined types, fighter and observation aircraft were in ample supply). I think that the current evidence is sketchy and probably stems from typos circulated around the Interwebz forward by sloppy historians, and until more solid evidence emerges, I think we should omit it from the list. Carguychris (talk) 20:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Midland Counties "US Miltary Aircraft Designations and Serials since 1909" says "FN - Designation given to a version of the P-35 single-seat monoplane fighter proposal for USN evaluation.". Its a well used source for designations. MilborneOne (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I found a reference in the Swanborough and Bowers book as well, it just wasnt' where I was expecting to find it (SMH). Is that the Andrade book to which you refer, and can you please give me a page number? I'm going to edit the P-35 article to properly reflect the designation. Carguychris (talk) 16:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is the John Andrade book, page 191  MilborneOne (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Edits made. Carguychris (talk) 17:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the NAF or Seversky "FN-1" apocryphal?
Template talk:USAF fighters

message: I recently removed the F-117 from this list for two reasons, first and most obvious-it came well after this series ended and as such was part of a different series. Indeed the USAF used a series of triple digit designations for covertly acquired foreign aircraft, such as YF-113 for a Mig-23, but this has nothing to do with the pre 1962 series. At the end of that series, the F-110 became the F-4. Starting the new triple digit series was the YF-110 which was actually a Chinese J-7. The pre 62 series was not continued, it ended with the F-111 and any triple digit designation afterward was meant to designate covertly acquired aircraft. The F-117 was supposed to look like one of them on paper, probably to throw off the Soviets and aviation community. (The last sentence was OR on my part, so I won't be posting it in an article.) Anynobody 22:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So, what template do you suggest we list the F-117? We are going to list it somewhere, aren't we? - BillCJ (talk) 06:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triple digit designations used after 1962 as part of this series is [[WP:OR]], and worse still wrong
Talk:Yardbird Suite

message: If you google regarding the source of the chord changes to this song - because Wikipedia doesn't address it (on this page; it does here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_jazz_contrafacts) - there are multiple propagations of the misstatement that: 
"It has been said that Charlie Parker's tune "Yardbird Suite" was based on the changes of a tune called "Rosetta." It has also been said that this claim has been refuted." (the source seems to be https://www.jazzguitar.be/forum/songs/38001-yardbird-suite-roestta-contrafact.html).
The changes are facts that can be determined without refutation or citation. Many if not most non-blues bebop compositions are openly based on borrowed chords, often altered slightly to make them more sophisticated and suitable for bebop improvisation. Yardbird Suite is at least as close to the changes of Rosetta as Ornithology to How High the Moon, and closer than Scrapple from the Apple is to Honeysuckle Rose. (The rule-proving exception is apparently Confirmation).
Wikipedia (given its high ranking in search algorithms) could clarify the situation by showing the similarities between the two chord progressions its this Yardbird Suite entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevintimba (talk • contribs) 06:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Widely propagated confusion about Rosetta changes
Talk:Yes Sir, I Can Boogie

message: became the duo's sole number one single in the UK - Why is that a significant piece of information?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.198.18.170 (talk) 00:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

message: It is simply NOT one of the best sellers of all time(Coachtripfan (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  sales 

message: yes there is a claim of 18 million sales but no evidence.
The song sold well in Europe but not well outside Europe.
Only the UK and German music certification databases can verify sales attributed to it.
If it had sold 750,000 in Japan it would be on Best Sellers of All Time list. It isn't
https://web.archive.org/web/20120315235617/http://homepage1.nifty.com/tuty/chart_japan_yougaku_singlesales1.htm Coachtripfan (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Sales
Talk:John Buscema/Archive 3 (2007 - April-June)

message: :::Added references, quotes, and additonal data to the 70's.
PS - anon IP User:70.55.202.38 - Yes that was me.
--Skyelarke 02:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 70's

message: :::Added references, quotes, and additonal data to the 80's. In theory, the entirety of the article has been given valid referenced sources.
--Skyelarke 00:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 80's
Talk:Lunar Expeditionary Complex

message: Hello,
I have begun to work on this in my sandbox: User:SimonHarvey/Sandbox/LEK Lunar Expeditionary Complex if anybody else of you would like to work on it I would love that as well!!! SimonHarvey (talk) 03:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:David Brody (journalist)

message: An editor was confusing this journalist with the veteran journalist and pundit David Broder, who has appeared on major television networks.
The present article is about the younger journalist who graduated in 1988.Dogru144 (talk) 23:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Reflective of larger problems wit this article, most of it is unsourced.Dogru144 (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion with another journalist

message: Excuse the brevity, pumping book on Mornining Joe 2/13/2018; worthy of listen and extraction of pertinent info for inclusion into his BLP.  Being right out of his mouth.--Wikipietime (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump Tool
Talk:Nowlin Middle School

message: http://www.schooldigger.com/go/MO/schools/1640002498/school.aspx is for the old Nowlin
http://www.schooldigger.com/go/MO/schools/1548003090/school.aspx is for the new Nowlin
WhisperToMe (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Schooldigger stuff

message: I'm reinstating the removed "Further reading" section inasmuch as pixels are cheap and there is some good stuff in there. In particular, there is a photo of Mr. Nowlin himself. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading
Talk:You Make Me Feel Like Dancing

message: On his episode of the “Unsung” documentary series, Ray Parker, Jr. claims to have written the song. It was picked out of one of his demos and he was disappointed that he didn’t get credit upon it’s release. 72.134.45.60 (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ray Parker, Jr. 

message: There’s a cover of “You Make Me Feel Like Dancing” as part of the soundtrack for the 2004 Ella Enchanted  performed by Anne Hathaway that appears on Spotify but is not streamable. The cover can still be found on YouTube or with physical copies. Lastinglegacy13 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ella enchanted cover
Talk:Nazarene (sect)/Archive 1

message: Will any information ever likely to go here not to be found also, and in a broader context, at Nazarene? Nazarene Christian is a redundant tautology. Nazarenes who do not consider themselves Christians (whatever Pauline Christianity might think) are not Nazarenes? Combine under Nazarene I suggest. Wetman 07:07, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Idea! User:210.118.226.147
Please sign your entries, 210.118.226.147.<BR>
I have no doubt that Nazarene Judaism deserves its own page, but the present version is rather strongly POV (see the links; one page is about disavowal of a Netzarim community of all others by similar name).<BR>
A few spin-off articles have been created, basically repeating the message of this article. Netzarim now redirects here, as does Notzrim. I lack the information to enhance POV on this page, but it bears saying that we're dealing with a few thousand people worldwide who definitely do not require several different Wipipedia pages that elaborate on their beliefs and relationships vis-a-vis other religions. JFW | T@lk 12:53, 12 May 2004 (UTC)

text: Their rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity may cause it to fall out of the Messianic Judaism movement. Will it? Is this pure speculation, or has a falling-out been scheduled?
I know chrstianity is trinitarian and that they ostricise unitarians as being non chrstian. I don't know what Messianics think though. The best way to find out is to try posting a comment about them being monotheistic Messianic Jews on the Mesianic Judaism article and see if it is accepted or rejected. Zestauferov 11:01, 17 May 2004 (UTC)

text: It is however recognised by the board of the Orthodox Yemenite Beit K'nêsêt in Raanana, Israel – Beit ha-K'nêsêt Môrêshêt Âvôt (which is recognized by the Israeli rabbinate). This keeps them firmly lodged within the orthodox Jewish Beit Din system and they are thus recognised as an authoritative body by the state of Israel. It is highly presumtive to say that this very implicit approval by the Israeli chief rabbinate can be seen as a de-facto legitimisation of the Netzarim movement within Judaism. The opposite is probably the case. JFW | T@lk 22:14, 12 May 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Interlanguage Links/reciprocal/en/pl

message: I had trouble understanding:
:Pick any entry in the list below and examine the two articles mentioned. If the entry is correct amend the articles(s) to solve the problem (see Help:Interlanguage links for guidance on this) and delete it from this list. If the entry is *not* correct, leave it on this list but strike it through (with  and  tags), and note why it was not correct.
Maybe the following is better:
:Pick any entry in the list below and examine the two articles mentioned. If the entry indicate a real problem with the articles, amend the articles(s) to solve the problem (see Help:Interlanguage links for guidance on this) and delete it from this list. If the entry does not indicate a problem, leave it on this list but strike it through (with  and  tags), and note why the links need not change.
(John User:Jwy talk) 03:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I like your wording much better, have ammended the template involved.  Remember you can alwasys just go head and make such changes yourself .. be bold.  The template is at Template:WikiProject Interlanguage Links/List handling instructions - suggestions - TB (talk) 12:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  I would make changes but this was the first time that I even knew this type of page existed so I wanted to make sure my understanding was correct first! (John User:Jwy talk) 16:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Instructions
Talk:Melt pond

message: blog--Smkolins (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: has anyone taken into account the heat generated by these earthquakes?--Smkolins (talk) 12:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

text: found an old analysis of seismic noise from 1993 Variation in microseism power and direction of approach in northeast Greenland (Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 1993; v. 83; no. 6; p. 1939-1958). It suggests some history of analysis which they are in agreement with. It speaks to frequency of vibrations, and directions of motion of the vibrations, and seasonal variation. It just never says the vibration are from ice changes. Curiously some frequencies peak in winter while others in summer. I wonder if they are seeing re-freezing of water? --Smkolins (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  some nice graphs of greenland glacial earthquakes if someone can find a way for them in wikipedia.... 
Talk:Topper Shutt

message: woah, that was the most vandalism I've ever seen on a page. I think that this is going to need to be semi protected for more than just a few hours with the amount of attention its getting.Himynameishelen (talk) 01:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It will expire in the middle of the night, Eastern time. Usually vandals get bored and leave after a little while if they can't vandalise, hopefully that will be the case here. Xenon54 / talk / 01:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There was some more vandalism done over night (now removed) but I think it's probably just about died off now. 92.29.8.254 (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: superbowl

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Tom Mintier

message: Dear fellow editors,
This link at http://www.brandnow.asia/about-new.html lists Tom Mintier's education and other bio facts but it is a PR firm, named Brand Now. So do not trust the information, unless you go to the source, such as the University of Louisville, school of journalism, and confirm the honors award. But, it is a good list to start with and provides direction. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link that lists bio Comment 

message: Dear fellow editors,
I am finding second-party sources about Tom Mintier's work in Thialand. Generally, the sources are saying the author/source appeared on Mintier's show in Thialand or was interviewed by Mintier in Thialand. Please help with a link to a third-party source. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  work in Thialand Comment
Talk:Jed Seidel

message: Jed as in Jed Mercurio (Line Of Duty, The Bodyguard, etc.) is short for Gerald; I've also seen it as a shortened or pet form of both Jeremiah/Jeremy, etc. and Jebediah. 49.185.191.208 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 11:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Jed short for something?