Talk:British Aerospace

message: :Image:British Aerospace.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:British Aerospace.png

message: I removed what seemed like a very dubious statement from the article: The 2007 documentary film Welcome Aboard Toxic Airlines contained evidence that vital data was withheld from a 1999-2000 Australian Senate Inquiry into the health and flight safety issues relating to oil fumes on the BAe 146. The film also contains an Australian Senator speech about money being paid by BAe for silence on the fumes issue. It has now been restored. I really don't think this material belongs here, but I will be happy to discuss here rather than edit-war. --MarchOrDie (talk) 20:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No edit war here.  I re-added the paragraph since I did not see a clear reason for removing it and it appeared to be cited.  I'm not sure where this belongs, but this article seems more fitting than aircraft article.  If it is not a real claim with valid sources then it probably does not belong anywhere. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. It wasn't a real cite. If there is a real cite to be had I agree it belongs here. --MarchOrDie (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this appropriate here? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on British Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bae.co.uk/html/cfwwst.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050302075701/http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/1995/fulltext/364c3.pdf to http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/1995/fulltext/364c3.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130205065028/http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/radiocommunication-licences/mobile-wireless-broadband/cellular-wireless-broadband/policy-and-background/history-of-cellular-services/ to http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/radiocommunication-licences/mobile-wireless-broadband/cellular-wireless-broadband/policy-and-background/history-of-cellular-services/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070125134301/http://www.na.baesystems.com/PressKit/Facts.pdf to http://www.na.baesystems.com/PressKit/Facts.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)