lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Medusa (Leonardo)

message: Hi - The lead says neither painting survives but the article does not later say why that is. Can the fate of the painting be added to the article? Canuckle 21:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fate of 2nd painting
Talk:Theo Osterkamp

message: There's another picture, I think it's better not to use such a "private" pic as his wedding. 
HerkusMonte (talk) 14:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: He was criticized by High Command for what? There's also a wedding picture of him, presumably during the war, but no mention of his marriage in the article. Anyone have more information? MartinezMD (talk) 06:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more info
Talk:Mori Ōgai

message: — Assignment last updated by Dslaym (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

message: I'm in no position to comment on Mori Ogai's short story, but its film adaptation is a milestone in Japanese movie history. Shouldn't the reference to the short story under Selected Works be somehow linked to here?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sansho_the_Bailiff
202.156.169.203 (talk) 09:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sansho_the_Bailiff/Steward 

message: Regarding Mori Ogai's Literature works section, I feel that there is very little on the collection of his literature that helped define his writing style. Shouldn't there be more information on all of his works (if possible) that can help show how much of an influence he was during the Meiji Restoration? ATang1392 (talk) 01:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information in literature  

message: The article says he discovered the cause of it and laid the foundation for a remedy, but any other source online I look at says he mistakenly believed that it was a contagious disease rather than its true nature as a dietary vitamin deficiency, and his stubbornness to in refusing to believe the accurate conclusions of others about how to treat it contributed to it causing a lot more deaths for a longer period of time than would have otherwise occurred (especially in the army).  Thus, rather than "but it was only resolved after his death", rather it was that his death removed an obstacle to it being resolved as he was part of the problem.--68.92.95.26 (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect statement about beriberi
Talk:Deborah Cooper

message: checked with her manager and her official bio for updates. According to him her myspace page is being updated on april 21 2008
66.229.212.172 (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is there anyone who knows any family life history
as where this lady was born, date, etc
and have any pic so we can id who this article is about?
/chas bronson sr/
she is one of the singers with C+C music factory, had a #1 Dance hit, ASCAP Award winner, Check the centaur link or myspace for her bio 66.229.212.172 (talk) 00:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: who is deborah cooper ?
Talk:Eric Anzalone

message: Doesn't this qualify as a stub? 67.83.72.38 07:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not anymore. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 09:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These sources do not belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them to see if they follow criteria per WP policy, so be careful in choosing any potential references I've moved here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sources don't belong in External links, but they do belong here! 
Talk:Haeterius ferrugineus

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — MaterialWorks 00:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hetaerius ferrugineus →  – Genus name misspelled, existing redirect precludes move. Dyanega (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 October 2023
Talk:Sergei Yushenkov

message: I think we must have this article.  Sergei Yushenkov was one of most visible political figures in Russia during 1990s. Please keep in mind that Mikhail Kodanev (co-chair of party "Liberal Russia") who is serving his sentence for assassination of Sergei Yushenkov was wrongly accused to cover up the involvement of FSB. Biophys 07:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that Sergei Yushenkov was the only member of Kovalev comission who was brave enought to try to investigate the bombings. Most others knew too well who did it and therefore did not even try. Please tell me if I am wrong (of course, I can be wrong). Sergei Kovalev did basically nothing. When asked by a Radio Free Europe correspondent what he thinks about Litvinenko allegations (already after murders of Yushenkov and Schekochikhin), he told that he basically has no idea who did the bombings, but he does not want to believe that it was done by the government, because if this is true then every person of good will must fight or leave such country immediately. That is the Chairman.Biophys 04:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kovalev comission

message: Please explain your placemenet of the tag.Biophys (talk) 17:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is written with only one point of view in mind, that is, the "Russian government conspiracy" point of view. There is not nearly enough information about other areas of his life. This is supposed to be a biography, remember? However, I don't have time to work on this article so I've removed the tag for now.  Krawndawg (talk) 00:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag
Talk:Guo Jing

message: Is  Dragon-Subduing Palms  a standard translation?  I think Dragon-Conquering 18 hands is more accurate.--user talk:hillgentleman 07:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is '' Dragon-Subduing Palms '' a standard translation?

message: According to previous editions, Guo Jing's birth year was stated as either 1188, 1196, 1200 or 1201. Why is it so then? 
(In order to "fit" his birth year in the timeline, we have to change it to 1205.) 
Newfraferz87 (talk) 01:14, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guo Jing's birth date 
Talk:Legacy port

message: I have removed MIDI port mention from this article as it is NOT a legacy port. Anybody who has any experience in the audio industry knows it is the standard used everywhere from Digitool's protools to high-end soundcards/interfaces. And if you read the MIDI article itself, you'll see immediately that it is far from dead. The interface is old, I admit, but that does not mean it is legacy. The BIOS is old, but noone would call it legacy yet.
--Wiki Fanatic | Talk 07:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto the PS/2 and joystick ports. Every computer I see uses PS/2 mice and keyboards. Aside from the joystick being combined in the midi port anyway, many game computers still use them. 130.101.100.100 15:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I dare say serial isn't either. DIN keyboard connectors - you don't see those too much anymore. RS-232 and RS-485 are still used almost everywhere and have their advantages over USB and Firewire. Towel401 22:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MIDI is not legacy
Talk:Viveca Lindfors

message: The Filmography "section" consisted of the line "The complete list of her 140 films :" (improperly formatted; punctuation directly follows the preceding word, it never takes a space before the character) followed by a reference number.  Except this wasn't a true reference, since no statement was made that could be referenced.  What it was was an improperly formatted link to her IMDB page.  Wikipedia doesn't exist to provide link pages to IMDB.  If you aren't going to provide a proper filmography here, don't create the section. 71.200.138.188 (talk) 13:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Filmography" 

message: i was watching tv when my showed me a movie with my great great great aunt it it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Savannah97 (talk • contribs) 03:24, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is my great great great aunt 

message: Does anyone know where Lindfors is buried? I have spoken to the churchyard where find a grave says that she is buried and they have no record of her. A Swedish newspaper article from the time of her death says that her children decided that she should be buried in New York. Is there anyone who has the possibility to find out? Frökennostalgi (talk) 22:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grave 
Talk:Nicholas Sand

message: I am Nicholas Sand and I feel that the most recent article is deficient for the folowing reasons:
1) THE MOST RECENT ARTICLE IS BARREN AND FACTUAL IN A VERY LIMITED WAY AND DOES NOT DESCRIBE THE SPIRITUAL NATURE OF MY QUEST AS IT DOES IN THE EARLIEST VERSION WHICH RELIED ON POETIC IMAGERY.
2)THE INCLUSION OF THE MANUFACTURE OF PRECURSORS TO FINE PSYCHEDLICS IS SILLY AND MIGHT AS WELL TALK ABOUT ME MAKING WATER, WHICH IS A BYPRODUCT OF MANY REACTIONS BUT NEITHER IMPORTANT OR RELEVANT.
3) THE MOST PENETRATING AND EPISTOMOLOGICALLY CORRECT VERSION IS THE ONE BY LOZO, 22 MAY 2006
Nick, you are a very lovely man indeed!
Spaceyaface xxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Nicholas Sand (talk • contribs) 08:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This explanation is from ALD-52 article, but is not cited- "This resulted in the first drug analogue trial, where Scully claimed that he and his partners did nothing illegal, because they were producing ALD-52, which was not an illicit drug. However, as the prosecution claimed, there were problems with such a rationale—ALD-52 was claimed to readily undergo hydrolysis to LSD, and secondly, the synthesis of ALD-52 required LSD. (The second point was based on the methods available in the scientific literature at the time). Scully was convicted and served time in prison."
I think this is notable as a first "analog trial" (I'm using the US spelling here), as well as just an interesting elaboration.  While I have not found verification in the literature, the points about ALD-52 are factual, and repeated in the 2015 documentary film, The Sunshine Makers (2015 film).  At some point maybe I'll be able to verify these in a written publication.Cuvtixo (talk) 20:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALD-52 "analog" defence
Talk:Just Another Girl on the I.R.T.

message: There is a significant amount of criticism about this movie, and in my view this article could be substantially expanded. As a few suggestions, other editors might consider expanding the article's discussion of some of the film's major themes/issues (such as birth control and pregnancy) and the film's soundtrack (hip-hop mostly by woman artists). 
The plot summary should also be overhauled, as it does not match wikipedia style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geethree (talk • contribs) 03:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for future edits

message: For anyone questioning whether this film can be categorized as a hood film, on that page's description and on List of hood films, the genre is described as "films focusing on the culture and life of African-Americans, Hispanic Americans, and/or in some cases, Asian Americans living in segregated, low-income urban communities." There is also a scholarly source provided as a reference for the listing of Just Another Girl, which is the book Habitus of the Hood (see pages 255 and 268). Just Another Girl is about a Black girl who lives in a low-income environment and addresses topics like generational poverty, race, etc. This qualifies the film as falling within the genre and its categorization as such should not be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectrallights (talk • contribs) 06:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization as a [[hood film]]
Talk:Alaska Army National Guard

message: I'm not sure what the rules are for citing sources.  (Every sentence is a link?)  Here are my sources for 01 Mar 2007:
The Alaska Army National Guard is composed of approximately 1850 soldiers  and maintains 77 armories and other facilities, including Fort Greely (as of 2006) <! -- http://www.usarak.army.mil/main/ArmyInAk/militaryandva.htm -->.
E5z8652 03:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's lots of information about citing sources at Wikipedia:Citing sources. And yes, sources should be cited, per WP:ATT. --Yksin 23:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: This article reads, almost in its entirety, like a generic boilerplate article which could apply to any state's National Guard with only minor tweaking.  There is a history section which takes up most of the article, which contains little to no content on, or relevance to, the actual history of the National Guard in Alaska.  I don't believe sources are as much the problem here as perhaps editors' choice of sources.RadioKAOS (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Results and maps of the 2006 Victorian state election

message: Can anyone explain why the person editing this page has listed the Liberal party as the first party in each block, almost as if in order of importance? Given that user Xtra is a Liberal supporter, that is hardly NPOV. 08:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'll chage it to the order as it appears on the ballot paper. Any other order is POV. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.64.214 (talk • contribs) 
Tables always put the major parties first. Xtra 08:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The results are in now, so Labor should be on top. User Xtra's POV places Liberal and the Nationals first because he supports them. Subtle POV, but typical of his class. I will change it back now, if you don't like it, get a third opinion. 05:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, conspiracy theories galore. Grow up. Xtra 12:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the order coincided with your own political preference, why would someone put Libs on top, when they haven't had state power for quite a while now, nor are they first alphabetically. Wishful thinking, I guess. By the way, you may want to have a look at weasel words and how not to use them. Thanks.02:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Siemens (disambiguation)

message: I've been disambiguating links to this page and all so far have been referring to Siemens AG. Therefore, I propose moving this DAB page to Siemens (disambiguation) and creating a redir from Siemens to Siemens AG. Has anyone got any objections? Gasheadsteve 08:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that this should be left as the disambig page, because there are three main carriers of the name Siemens: the unit, the present company, and the family.  I don't think that any of these should have preference particularly, and so I would favour leaving the situation as it is.  Noisy | Talk 10:58, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll leave it for now, but if we end up with hundreds of links pointing here again instead of to Siemens AG it might be worth revisiting in the future. Gasheadsteve 09:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Cheers.  I appreciate the clean-up effort that you've made.  Noisy | Talk 16:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Two Family House

message: Please check if  is needed in article. Hoverfish 08:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah... it's a little tiny... probably add an infobox and a cast section to get the rating up to start.  (Then it is your decision on whether or not to remove the film-stub.) Cbrown1023 14:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Albert and David Maysles

message: Aside from the article obviously being a wholly inadequate stub, the lead and infobox are confused with respect to David Maysles's date of birth and age at death.  The body is a stuttering little gloss on Albert Maysles's early career and includes no information about David Maysles at all, other than cause of death and the confused dates. Maybe I can work on this a bit.  Rt3368 (talk) 09:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs attention 

message: Apparently they filmed the 1969 Woodstock festival, according to the Porter Bibb article (unfortunately the links there don’t work for me, one says that ‘this website cannot be viewed in your country’ and the other requires Flash Player but they might work for others). Overlordnat1 (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1969 Woodstock festival
Talk:Bus 44

message: The film opens with 車四十四 rather than 车四十四. At least the version at youtube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLu-UkOD2FE). Can someone explain why the article uses 车四十四?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breutje (talk • contribs) 13:57, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese name
Talk:Slava-class cruiser

message: Was the class named for the Russian battleship Slava? A2Kafir 00:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: on Google maps or wikimapia shows the unfinished Ukrayina in Mykolaiv. --Dual Freq (talk) 01:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial image 

message: Moskva is described as the flagship for the black sea fleet. Shouldn't this be added as well as the successful missle test and exercise?
69.208.228.193 (talk) 15:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's also recently been in action against the Georgians in recent days, and some reports state that it was damaged and had to disengage due to a fire. If the sources bear out it would lend credence to the GlobalSecurity.org assessment that the type is vulnerable to this. 2p0rk (talk) 13:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slava class ship flagship for Black sea fleet? 

message: Change "sunk by Ukraine" to at least "possibly sunk by Ukraine", as it has not been proven 93.22.38.169 (talk) 05:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If Pentagon says that they "cannot confirm" a missile attack, despite having complete radar coverage, it's pretty obvious that Ukraine is blowing smoke, as usual.   DW75 (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2022 

message: Under "Lost" heading in the initial grid, it states "2" when the correct number is "1."  Given the Moskva is referenced, I suspect it's a typo rather than miscalculation. 2601:19C:417F:DD00:14AE:56BA:F98:A43 (talk) 07:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lost" subsection typo. 

message: also just noticed that, pursuant to the "Lost" typo, the number under "Active" should be changed to "2" as they "Varyag" and "Marshall Ustinov" are both still in service presently. 2601:19C:417F:DD00:14AE:56BA:F98:A43 (talk) 07:14, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Active" heading typo 

message: This field of the infobox is a little strange, because lists STEAM turbines in a COGOG system. My feeling is that the field retains some info from an input source of a different ship. 151.29.75.212 (talk) 10:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COGOG 

message: How much did it cost to build the ship or what was it's worth at the time of destruction?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shai-Huludim (talk • contribs) 10:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth
Talk:Château Pichon Longueville Baron

message: This page was moved to "Château Pichon Longueville" which I have always considered to be the pre-1850 name of the undivided property which also included the current Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande. It is always referred to as "Château Pichon Longueville Baron" or "Château Pichon Longueville (Baron)" by wine critics and the like. They may sometimes call themselves Château Pichon Longueville for short but its old-fashioned label actually writes the name as "Château Longueville au Baron de Pichon-Longueville" which doesn't seem to be used. I'd be willing to go with "...(Baron)" rather than "...Baron" and consider it something added as a disambiguation. Tomas e (talk) 10:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Tomas e's entry of September 2012 hints at some of the problems, but this article needs work.
First, the entry confabulates a château and a wine. There may be a château Pichon Longueville ( it does not show up on Google Maps...), but there is definitely not a wine Pichon Longueville Baron, regardless of wine world usage. The two need to be separated. In my comments below, I concentrate on the entry as it concerns a wine.
The wine, commercialized today by AXA Millésimes, has historically been, according to the label, Château Longueville/ au Baron de Pichon-Longueville. With all due respect to Le Guide Hachette de Vins (2019), there is no such wine as "Ch. Pichon-Longueville Baron" except in colloquial usage. There is a wine Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande under separate ownership, but please note that there is not hyphen in the name of that wine.
The History section also seems confused. Le Guide Hachette says that the vineyard was originally assembled by Jacques de Pichon with no mention of a gift from his father-in-law. All this needs confirmation by source and/ or amplification. Perhaps Pierre Rauzan deserves the credit for establishing the vineyard property, but a source is needed for such a claim.
To return to the château, it seems that that was built by Raoul de Pichon-Longueville (according to Le Guide) after the 1850 division of the original property, of which he received two-fifths (70 ha.) as an inheritance, while his sister received the three-fifths (90 ha.) that would make up the Comtesse de Lalande property.
GianniBGood (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry needs work!
Talk:Goh Sin Tub

message: Who decides that this article  created  by Ryan D is of mid importance when the article on Chandran Nair is of a low importance.  When was a vote taken?  Who decides? Ivygohnair 00:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever that has bothered to rate its importance, which in the aforementioned cases, aren't that many people. Chensiyuan 01:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled