lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:4th Queen's Own Hussars

message: See . Opera hat (talk) 21:16, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churchill picture 

message: The photo of Churchill is the wrong way round.JF42 (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks the wrong way round to me too. It's usually the other way round in biographies.Paulturtle (talk) 00:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of  Churchill 

message: This unit did serve in the second Boer War and was one of the units that Churchill was assigned to at the time prior to his capture and escape. The reference is in "The Last Lion" by William Manchester.  I still need to look that up though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.82.38.42 (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Boer War participation
Talk:Whiteladies Picture House

message: The article says that when this cinema closed in 2001, there were conditions "forbidding its future use as a cinema". Why do these conditions no longer apply? Were they time-limited? 86.150.147.172 (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened with the restrictive covenant? 
Talk:John By

message: Could someone add the correct pronunciation? Was it Bai or Bee? Benjamin Trovato (talk) 03:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: As of the current edit, this page states that the uOttawa engineering building, Colonel By Hall (aka CBY) was unveiled in 2005. Per the uOttawa page about the building, the building was inaugurated in 1970.
The 2005 date precedes my time at uOttawa; could this possibly refer to a renaming of the building, or (more likely) the unveiling of a plaque with the mentioned text?
Julesmazur (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Ottawa engineering building 
Talk:Spherical polyhedron

message: I dropped in a table of spherical tiling images I had on Wythoff symbol. Tom Ruen 21:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Tom. Steelpillow 09:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of images 

message: I moved this deleted section here below, topologically valid tessellations, in case someone else can someday find some references that can support them. My only source is Coxeter:
 Introduction to geometry, 21.3 Regular maps, p. 388:
Exercise: Describe the maps {2,1} and {1,2} on the sphere. (The former has one face, a digon {2}; the latter has two faces which are monogons {1}.)
: Tom Ruen (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limiting cases
Talk:Elizabeth Power

message: There is a contradiction in this article, which lists the subject as both the former/divorced wife of Michael Aspel and also states that she will never divorce him because of her strong Catholicism, ie: they are estranged. 
I am not totally convinced of the merits of the item referenced as (1) with regard to her status as the word "former" is arguably ambiguous, particularly in tabloid journalese. The WP entry for Aspel lists him as co-habiting with the third party named in the reference, but not divorced from Power.
Can anyone clear this up? Sitush (talk) 21:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence that Lizzie and Michael have divorced, I have changed "former wife" to "estranged wife" to reflect the fact that they are legally seperated but still married. Caesar's Daddy (talk) 09:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital status 

message: Date-of-birth, please  -  as standard on Wiki pages. Valetude (talk) 20:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  D.o.B?
Talk:Anderssen's Opening

message: Of course it is true that it's "premature" to play a3 on move one; nevertheless, in my experience one gets full or near full value from 1.a3 in many or most cases, not in some (as stated in the article).
1.a3 e5 2.c4 transposes into a line which is quite reasonable for White.
1.a3 d5 2.d4 (or 2.Nf3 followed by e3 and d4) with the idea of playing a delayed Reversed Queen's Gambit Accepted with a full extra tempo.
1.a3 c5 2.c4 (2.e4 is of course also possible) and if Black plays closed then White plays as in the Symmetrical variation and the move 1.a3 has full value (as it prepares the thrust b4 following g3, Bg2, Nc3 and Rb1), whereas if Black plays open (i.e. ...Nf6 and ...d5) White is again playing a reversed system a full tempo up (by playing Nf3, cd: and e3).
Often White can play a Benoni a full tempo up.
1....g6 (as given in Nunn) is therefore logical; making use of 1.a3 is then problematic so far as I presently know (going into an English or a reversed King's Indian are reasonable ideas, but it's not even plausible that the move 1.a3 will necessarily prove useful).
In the article, the value of 1.a3 for White is somewhat understated. For many players at club level, who want to avoid studying masses of opening variations, 1.a3 can often be very useful because in many cases Black's first move will be e5 or d5 or c5 thus allowing White to play a strong Black defence as a mirror image i.e Sicilian or Kings Indian etc which will compensate for the loss of a tempo with 1.a3. Also this strategy bypasses the need to understand the vast array of defences that might be encountered if as White, you start with 1.e4 or 1.d4.78.150.221.248 (talk) 21:58, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to wonder if anyone has ever addressed the response 1...a6. It seems definitely in the spirit of White's opening. ("You go first." "No, you go first!") A plausible continuation among jokers might be 2.h3 h6. Double sharp (talk) 08:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: The pawn on a3 often proves useful

message: i have a feeling it is fake AnonRed96 (talk) 05:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just deleted it. Helicopter Helicopter Helicopter (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

text: I can still easily replicate it via just going to a previous version of the article. And, no, you don't need the Wayback Machine, because it's already an official Wikipedia feature. Helicopter Helicopter Helicopter (talk) 15:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I cannot find anything on the Spider sense gambit
Talk:Night Girl

message: Mmm as the person who started this article years ago (I had a log in  long since forgotten). This thing that's been added saying this article has issues? And it turns out these issues are that it relies too much on primary sources? WTF? And then it says not enough citations? The primary sources (being my own extensive comics knowledge, which are easily confirmed by others reading the same comic books) *are* the citations! And somehow they aren't good enough?
You can't have citations of primary sources because they are supposedly at risk of 'novel interpretation'. Well who's to say the secondary or tertiary sources aren't subject to the same? This you can't use primary sources thing is absolutely moronic. Who the hell dreamed that up? That idea wasn't around back when I was active on wikipedia.
If we had gone with this idea then no one would ever have written down any history or science in antiquity. Sorry you Greek philosophy guys! You're the first to write this so it's a primary source and they aren't allowed donchaknow?
The primary source is the comic books themselves....in an article about a comic book character. And as I say anyone who wants to confirm the source? Read the books yourselves. I didn't pull all this out of my backside.
No primary sources. That's just bizarre. It's about knowledge, and if that knowledge is cited as the references in this article are (with the original comics) what's the problem? Why does it need to have passed down through more than one person? The original source is enough.
Wikipedia is full of too many anal people with too much damn time on their hands who are going on a psuedo-academic power trip all the time. That's a large reason why I don't edit anymore.
*shakes head*  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.0.194 (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Template talk:UFOs

message: The information contained in this template is extremely biased towards non-objective sources of information about UFOs. I fully intend to correct this when I get time. 24.19.151.38 21:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * You will discuss with us any corrections you have in mind, it must be agreed upon (:O) -Nima Baghaei (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

text: * If you wanted to, you could discuss the ideas you had in mind with us now before you start editing it in the future in order to get it out of the way, we could see what the consensus is (:O) -Nima Baghaei (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias? 

message: This template is too large, to incoherent, misleading (ugh, look what's classified as science here, and includes topics not directly related to UFOlogy. If you need this template at all, downsizing would address most concerns. --Pjacobi 20:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *The problem with this is that you are going to get a lot of people trying to put every single ufologist on the template and that really can't be stopped, it just gets messy, its best to put all the major listings in articles and just provide a single link, the template in my opinion is fine right now (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 22:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pls downsize this template 

message: Please add Space jellyfish to the "Types of UFOs" list.
Change
|group3 = Types of UFOs
|list3 =
* Black triangle
* Flying saucer
* Foo fighter
* Ghost rockets
* Green fireballs
* Mystery airship
To
|group3 = Types of UFOs
|list3 =
* Black triangle
* Flying saucer
* Foo fighter
* Ghost rockets
* Green fireballs
* Mystery airship
* Space jellyfish
-- 65.94.42.168 (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: It seems to just be overeexposure and the back of the woman who's shown in the other photo of this 2 photo set.--2600:1700:4000:62E0:D8A0:460E:A85E:B04C (talk) 02:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Solway Firth spaceman under hoaxes now? 

message: Even first line in the article it is said.2600:1700:4000:62E0:68EA:BE4C:E44B:C7E5 (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roswell is a hoax  

message: This template is at the bottom of his article, but doesn't contain a link to it. Shouldn't he be in there somewhere? 89.168.67.128 (talk) 20:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[George Adamski]]
Talk:Woodbourne Correctional Facility

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: The new one has the current DOCCS logo and info on it. 67.245.208.219 (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  That sign is old
Talk:The Countdown (The O.C.)

message: These summaries are fairly unencyclopedic...when I have time I'll try to edit them. Givennovel 22:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Periostracum

message: I found the following statement in this article :
 The word "periostracum" means "around the bone"
This translation seems to me a bit dubious. The Greek word ὄστρακον (ostrakon) means literally
translated shell (of eggs, mussels, etc) as you can check here. It can also refer to a broken piece of pottery (See: ostracism). So I think the correct translation should be "around the shell".--Eusc (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Very useful note Eusc. Next time please "Be Bold" and feel free to change something like this yourself. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation questionable
Talk:Tiananmen (disambiguation)

message: Tiananmen Square protests (disambiguation) redirects to Tiananmen Square protests, so, I think that...:
* ... at the article is better: 
Tiananmen Square protests (disambiguation) 
than                Tiananmen Square protests (disambiguation).
<BR>I say it's better'cause: the link is to the real article (not to that redirection).
<BR>I'm going to do it. 
<BR>Note that: Tiananmen Square protests (disambiguation) == Tiananmen Square protests. --PLA y Grande Covián (talk) 07:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tiananmen Square protests]]'bout the article & a redirection 
Talk:William O. Farber

message: This is my first Wikipedia article.  Much of the information was gathered from one place, his obituary.  Being a rare authoritative resource, I referenced it extensively, and apologize if the article does constitute plagiarism.    I tried to leave in just the facts, and reword them appropriately.  I believe this article provides a decent starting point for fleshing out more information about Doc Farber.
Anopheles 22:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Seed Article
Talk:WGRB

message: ″The station was hosted primarily by black disc jockeys from 1962 thru 1964, when it became America's first 'all-news' radio station, W-NUS, on September 3, 1964.″
Not true. San Francisco KFAX ("K-Facts") went all-news in 1960, and Gordon McLendon – who later owned WNUS – flipped XEAK in Tijuana to all-news in 1961 as XETRA ("Extra News"), covering both Los Angeles and San Diego with its huge 50,000-watt signal.
In the time after KFAX and XETRA came along, numerous all-news stations began popping up all around the United States. WNUS may not have even been one of the first ten all-news stations in the nation!
SOURCES:
The History of KJBS Radio (Bay Area Radio Museum)
XTRA-AM brought all-news format to L.A., from Tijuana (Los Angeles Times Archives)
--BayRadioDJ (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WNUS Chicago: NOT The First All-News Station In The United States
Talk:The Square, Bournemouth

message: Needs a lot more detail like toilet locations, bus stops, entertainment, clock tower leaning etc etc.--SlipperyHippo 22:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't disagree, but we'll need references (WP:V) and there's a danger that people will start deleting things as non-notable trivia.--Holdenhurst 17:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This article definitely doesn't demonstrate that this Square has enough importance to warrant its own article.  The shopping aspect of it is covered at length in the Bournemouth article, and the other two sentences from this article could easily find a place in that article as well.  But, I thought I'd hold off tagging this, to see if anyone could provide a reason that this deserves its own article.  CharacterZero | Speak 20:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge and redirect looks right. Tyrenius 01:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Salmson air-cooled aero-engines

message: Help! Moved this in error needs reverting to plain Salmson 9. I need to do more research into it before leaping off both feet first (SNAFU)Petebutt (talk) 07:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is an engine family article. I fully intend to sort out the Salmson engines given time, I have a navbox on the go in my sandbox (somewhere) after another user asked me to help (see my talk page). Would appreciate if you could discuss any moves like this at WT:AETF in future, many thanks. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 19:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

message: I have made a fairly drastic move, to get rid of lasting confusion and to allow people to write articles about individual engines without causing major upheaval; Witness British Salmson AD.9, Salmson AD.3 and Salmson B.9--Petebutt (talk) 11:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: article move
Template talk:Ireland-actor-stub

message: Can the shamrock on this template (and others concerning Irish people, shows, authors, etc.) be removed and replaced with the Irish flag? As a Irish person, I can tell you that our flag carries far more weight with us than the shamrock (and is actually a massive cliché about Ireland). Plus, Britain and America have their flags on similar templates. User:GusF 23:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Any objections to changing the clapperboard with the Irish tricolour to a clapperboard featuring the 4 provinces flag - especially seeing as how the "Ireland Actor" and categories such as "Irish film actor" include people from Northern Ireland?  --HighKing (talk) 19:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Flag
Talk:Comp Air

message: I believe the correct word is certificated, i.e. a type certificate was issued, when referring to the FAA signing off on a commercial aircraft design.Es330td (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Americans say "certificated" whereas most other English-speaking countries say "certified". - Ahunt (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Certificated
Talk:Aérospatiale SA 360 Dauphin

message: - BillCJ 06:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking good!

message: Is the aircraft in the example picture not an  SA 365 Reg. D-HOPQ? - Airliners.net - D-HOPQ Bthebest (talk) 15:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture 

message: Eurocopter France is now Airbus Helicopters.  However, the FAA site for Airworthiness Directives still shows the SA 360 C as being Eurocopter France -- the only remaining Eurocopter model for which Airworthiness Directives have been issued. 75.32.48.185 (talk) 21:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airbus Helicopters 
Talk:My Self-Examination

message: Do we need a separate article on one episode of a series? Jeez! What is WP coming to?--SlipperyHippo 22:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone adding something about the "Soup Nazi" reference?--Jeff Bongi 01:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld Reference
Talk:Smith Street Motorway

message: I have deleted the paragraph on Smith Street being known as route 66. Smith Street Motorway is exit 66, which is already referenced to at the start of the article. The route number is State Route 10.
MagpieShooter 22:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route 66 

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:List of Black Order members

message: The Gray Ark fan book says it's Chaozii. I can and will upload a scan for proof if someone doubts me.
I know how every character's name is spelled in Gray Ark. However, there was a discussion on this at the bottom of this page. The conclusion was we spell it how Viz Media spells it. Unless the publisher adopts the Chaozii spelling, it's Chaoji. But I'm not sure how Malcolm's last name is going to be spelled on the page. Itzjustdrama (drama?) 03:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaoji vs. Chaozii 

message: to his part should we add a pic from the anime of yeegar fourty years ago when he was a teacher?
-Allen Walker-
:It is not needed. None of the characters had pictures.--Frontier95 (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic of yeegar fourty year ago? 

message: If Kanda had died, then how could it be confirmed that he can still continue his career as an exorcist? And would we never find out who he had been searching for, that "mysterious person?"
-Anonymous-
-What now? Kanda isn't dead, not by a long stretch. Hashire (talk) 21:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: Just wondering, but should Lavi's previous alias, Deak, be added in as it was before it was removed (His real name is possibly Deak (ディック, Dikku), as revealed by a past memory of Bookman in Road's dimension, although this could equally be one of his previous 48 aliases.)? Asking before I do so. Itzjustdrama (drama?) 03:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It currently says it was his 48th alias, but it doesnt translate it as Deak. Thanks for the input. Itzjustdrama (drama?) 21:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deak 

message: I think the page needs an introduction. I believe the paragraph found under the Black Order heading on List of D.Gray-man characters should be fine. Thoughts? Itzjustdrama (drama?) 22:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: At this point, it's pretty difficult for me to separate speculation from the rest of it. Especially when it says Lenalee shares a stronger bond with Allen, Allen and the 14th statements; how much of that is speculation? The statement relating Link's assignment and Cross' disappearance is definitely speculation as well as the statement saying Cross is still alive. I say his status is unknown as he disappeared and should be stated that way. In addition, who was affected by the Virus is useless and any other minor information should be removed. Thoughts? Comments? Itzjustdrama (drama?) 04:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation and needless information 

message: I think that some characters should have thier own article...User:Envidia  —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure we're able to create one for Allen because reviews mention him. But I'm not sure if there is enough published, third-party sources to create an article for anyone else. Itzjustdrama (drama?) 21:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Main articles
Talk:Talal Abu-Ghazaleh

message: This article MUST have third party published sources documenting each of the claimed associations and activities.
::and by the way, an honorary degree is not part of one's education, but part of one's honours. DGG 23:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent sources 

message: I've reviewed another recording of the video MEMRI cited that has been posted on his website: video. However, it is only in Arabic and does not provide an english translation, and therefore by itself cannot be cited as evidence that MEMRI's translation was incorrect. If a separate Arabic-English translation is available somewhere on the Internet, or if a news article has reported that MEMRI mistranslated his words, please provide a link to it. Otherwise, please stop removing this material.
Regarding the article in the The Journal of Turkish Weekly, it consists of a translation from an Arabic article which was published in Bahrain's Al Ayam newspaper on Thursday 13 May 2010 Turkish Daily article. 
MEMRI and the Turkish weekly do not cite the same source (they cite different interviews, one given in May and another in July 2010). Again, if you have any evidence that the Turkish Weekly article has mistranslated his words, please provide a source. 
Claiming that these translations are inaccurate based on your own intepretation of Arabic-English is Original Research. You have to cite an independent source to support your claim.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 07:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Statements on Zionism and Jews - section

message: Again, on the video [] he makes all of the same statements that are cited in the transcript. That's why I've provided links to both to avoid confusion. I'm not sure what you are talking about when you claim the video supports your position - I've watched the video several times and he makes all the statements that are cited in this article. If you have any evidence that the translation itself is incorrect, please provide it. Otherwise, please stop removing this material. And please use this article's talk page to support your view (using edit summaries is very cumbersome). (Hyperionsteel (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ramooz - Please use the talk page
Talk:Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania

message: I am new to Wikipedia editing, but I think this page could benefit from information regarding Shoemakersville's other historical industries such as the Wolfe Dye & Bleach Co, started in 1902, the Glen-Gery Corporation, whose roots go back to the 1890s, and the The Brush Beryllium Company, now known as Materion. The Route 61 corridor through Shoemakersville is laden with industries that have supported Shoemakersville's economy for over a century. OhKK (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical industries