lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Angular frequency

message: Currently, we have a redirect from "angular speed" to this article.  I believe that the article should be under the heading "angular speed" because that is the more general term, with "angular frequency" being one particular way to measure angular speed.  This is a fairly minor point.  What does anyone else think?  Dbfirs 22:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that angular speed should redirect to angular velocity instead. :-) --Steve (talk) 05:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no objection, though we would need to expand the lead, or add a section for the redirect, to explain that angular speed is just the magnitude of the angular velocity vector.  Dbfirs 07:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think angular frequency should stay it's own article, as it's often used as a measure in other oscillations as well, being a shorthand for 2*pi*f. That being said, I agree that angular speed should redirect to angular velocity, as it's just the magnitude of the vector. Kyrsjo (talk) 13:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That has now been done (see above), but do we need further clarifications?  Dbfirs 16:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angular speed 

message: Can someone work these 3 cases out a bit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talk • contribs) 13:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first paragraph of this article 

message: I think there's quite a lot of confusion with regards to terminology in the opening to this article. The most common other name for angular frequency is simply frequency and several of the alternative names such as orbital frequency refer to specific examples of angular frequency. I think this could do with some clarification. Jobla6 16:53, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminological Confusion
Talk:Cèilidh

message: We're not currently all that spoiled for choice for images (and even less so for videos) of cèilidhs, but just to briefly note, two of the three current files are from the Washington, D.C. area. It would be nice to eventually have some more from, ya know, Ireland or Scotland. Sdkb (talk) 07:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sdkb totally agree, thought it was weird that the video is from USA when it's about a traditional scottish/Irish thing, almost seems better to not have the video at all Christiegrinham (talk) 11:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image geographic diversity 

message: It's confusing to have these as separate articles. Céilí dance, which is exclusively about this activity in [Republic of] Ireland, is basically just the missing "In Ireland" section of this article, which has section on Scotland, Northern Ireland, and England. This is a WP:CONTENTFORK based on nothing but a Gaelic dialectal spelling difference.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm undecided, but leaning towards merging. The sources currently cited in the article are all specifically about Irish céilí, so it is at least justifiable to have a specific article for that concept.  On the other hand, it seems to be sufficiently related to the English & Scottish ceilidh traditions that it makes sense to me to cover them all in the same article: so many of the basic concepts are the same that otherwise we're just unnecessarily repeating ourselves.  (Indeed, there are dances which are used in all three traditions: Sir Roger de Coverley, which is illustrated in the lead video for Céilí dance, is an English dance which you will find danced in both Scottish ceilidh and Irish céilí, and in American traditions too!)  If we do keep Irish céilí as a separate article, I don't know enough about the Irish traditions to say either way but it may well be that the Northern Irish céilí tradition should be discussed there rather than in Cèilidh.  (I also note that Cèilidh#In popular culture includes many examples related to RoI céilíthe). Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Céilí dance]] 

message: Starting a list here as I run across things we can use:
*  Covers Highland games as well as the cèilidh, pp. 218–222.
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  11:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional sources 

message: Something I noticed about this article is that the ceilidhs in the British Isles are given much more focus than those outside of that area. I understand that this is where the ceilidh originated, but I believe that more attention should be given to ceilidhs outside of this region. It is an important aspect of many cultures, so I think they should get more than the small mention they currently have. 
Also I need to leave my evaluation here for an assignment, so here.
Palladiumpaladin (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceilidhs outside of the British Isles
Talk:William Lawes

message: Dear all, I removed the claim that Lawes' music has only become widely available in recent years. Even though I felt the same about it, after research, it appears not to be true. This | Discogs page in fact shows 50 recordings with William Lawes' music included, almost perfectly distributed over time since 1957.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeesterDaan (talk • contribs) 03:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Widely available only in recent years?

message: It says Charles was Prince of Wales.... isn't Henry the Prince of Wales as the 1st born and Charles Duke of Clarence? MartinY (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dodgy Facts
Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/WikiReader/William Shakespeare

message: I've made some major changes to Shakespearean_authorship.  The reasons for the changes are noted in discussion on that page.  I invite commentary, discussion, and assistance with editing the changes, if need be, for clarity and correct usage. The existing page still needs considerable work, imo,  before it can be taken seriously.  Somehow, all previous commentators have not noticed that the alleged Sh. signature reproduced on the page is a fake, and moreover, in contravention to Wicki guidelines, is unsourced.--BenJonson 23:38, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to Authorship Page

message: You can use Wikipedia:Stable versions to select your articles. -- Zondor 14:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Stable versions]] 

message: This page has now been updated - as of November 2008 Kathleen.wright5 22:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page updated as of November 2008
Talk:Greatest Hits (ZZ Top album)

message: Anyone else agree that the following passage should either be deleted or expounded upon..."with no original track recordings from the first five albums made before 1979."
My reasoning is that it should come as no surprise that there is nothing on this greatest hits album that originated on the first five albums for two reasons. First, those songs appeared on "The Best of ZZ Top". Second, the band was signed to London for their first five albums. This Greatest Hits album covers their Warner Bros years through 1992.
Or, keep it SIMPLE...replace the entire paragraph starting at "It is notable..." with something like "All songs come from the albums Deguello (1979) through Afterburner (1985) with the exceptions of Tush, La Grange, Viva Las Vegas, and Gun Love."
The point is that the existing paragraph, as written, is cluttered and confusing. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there was no objection over the last ~17 months I went ahead and did it. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Five Albums
Talk:Agent 212

message: I deleted the English translations of the book titles, as the L'agent 212 albums have never (as of July 2017) been translated into English. Some of the translations given on the page bore no resemblance to the original French titles, indicating they were perhaps translated from Dutch titles. SiberianCat (talk) 05:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: English Translations of Titles
Talk:Austrian Nazism

message: this article refers to Austian national socialism, an -ism or ideology. But why does it have the info for the specific party. The party should have its own wikisite with a link from here. Lihaas (talk) 10:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: party link=

message: this article should be changed in title to "Austrian Nazism." The term National Socialism in English isn't widely used except rarely or by Neo-nazis themselves.Tallicfan20 (talk) 02:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  name change to Austrian Nazism
Talk:1 E-43 s

message: Typical content is: 
:To help compare different orders of magnitudes this page lists times between 10-26 s and 10-25 s.
:*Shorter times
:*Longer times
I don't see anything of any use here. So far I've only noticed two of them that have any actual content; 1 E-28 s lists "10-28 seconds after the Big Bang: start of cosmic inflation." Any content that belongs on these pages would, in my opinion, be better located on a single page in list or tabular format. Dpbsmith 16:29, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. No, I haven't got VfD notices on all them... will try to get them all before tomorrow. Dpbsmith 16:38, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: P.P.S. There seem to be more. In the positive direction, they go as far as 1 E19 s. Dpbsmith 16:38, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the advantage of doing it this way over combining them all on a single page and creating individual articles only when it is clear that the page is too long? Having them all on one page makes the relationships clearer. Dpbsmith 17:08, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[1 E-26 s]], [[1 E-27 s]], [[1 E-28 s]], [[1 E-29 s]], [[1 E-30 s]], [[1 E-31 s]], [[1 E-32 s]], [[1 E-33 s]], [[1 E-34 s]], [[1 E-35 s]], [[1 E-36 s]], [[1 E-37 s]], [[1 E-38 s]], [[1 E-39 s]], [[1 E-40 s]], [[1 E-41 s]] and [[1 E-42 s]]
Talk:Saiyuki (manga)

message: *Book Listing, Archive
*Saiyuki Novel Archive
*Anthology, Archive
*Postcard Yellow, Postcard Red, Postcard Green, Postcard Purple, Yellow Archive, Red Archive, Green Archive, Purple Archive
*Zero-Sum editors blog, Archive
*Saiyuki Fest (main page), Archive
*Saiyuki Fest Goods, Archive
*Saiyuki Musical info, Archive WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref dump 

message: As even Wikipedia notes, there are (at least) two actors named Hiroki Suzuki: this one, who played Jan Kandou/GekiRed in Juken Sentai Gekiranger, and this one, who played Kazuma Kendate/AR Kamen Rider Blade in Kamen Rider Decade. The question is, which one of these played Sanzo in the musicals? Further complicating matters, neither of them has the role listed in their acting credits here on Wikipedia. How about someone clarify this? 187.76.75.162 (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Hiroki Suzuki?
Talk:Obscuris vera involvens

message: "Obscura vera involvens" is about as likely to be inscribed on Athena's shield as "I like Ike". Don't we have a List of Latin phrases? Doesn't it have space for some brief remarks about each expression? Who will find this here? Wetman 23:43, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Why would 'I like Ike' be enscribed on her shield? What are you talking about? Intrigue 00:07, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:Culture of the United States

message: If confining itself to the culture of the USA, something like "United States culture" or "Culture of the United States" might be more in line with other article titles in Wikipedia, I think. -- Infrogmation 23:48, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Category:American culture is a subcategory of :Category:American studies and 
:Category:American studies is a subcategory of :Category:American culture. This is a bit peculiar. Which is the parent and which the child? — Robert Greer (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories [[:Category:American culture|American culture]] and [[:Category:American studies|American studies]]
Talk:Wes Jackson

message: There's no mention of Jane Fonda in the text of the article. I personally have nothing against Jane Fonda, but as she is controversial and apparently irrelevant to the article, I recommend a picture of Wes Jackson by himself or with some of the people who actually work at the Land Institute.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mudguppy (talk • contribs) 19:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the purpose of Jane Fonda in the picture? 

message: http://www.macfound.org/fellows/464/
Bananasoldier (talk) 00:42, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible source 
Talk:Iraqi Interim Government

message: 172 deleted the image. I thought this piece of propaganda was rather funny and ineffectual, in fact even exposed the Bush idea of freedom, in an article about an unelected, unaccountable authoritarian regime, who's first moves were the banning of al-Jazeera, the restoration of Saddam's secret police, re-installiation of Baathists to control the media, re-introduction of capital punishment, the authorisation of bombing civilian areas in Fallujah, crushing al-Sadr so that he can't join the political process, etc. - pir 13:09, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. Maybe not. From what I'd seen, here in the Untied States reports of this note were highly favorable and bordered on glowing. It probably made for good U.S. election year propaganda more than anything else. 172 13:14, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly see your point, but I think it's one of those propaganda stunts they'll come to regret when Allawi destroys an exploding Iraq in order to save it. Just like the "Mission Accomplished" thing. IMO propaganda always falls apart here at Wikipedia when confronted with factual information. Anyway, since the image is on the talk page now, I'm not very bothered. - pir 13:21, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good point. If a caption is added under the photo, I'll favor reinserting it in the article. 172 13:24, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I really like this image, it's a great example of the Bush-men's Orwellian conception of freedom. I think in the future it will be as embarrassing as Rummy's handshake with Saddam - let's not flush it down the memoryhole. Difficult to find a good NPOV caption though. Maybe something like "Note from Condoleezza Rice to George W. Bush, who then wrote “Let Freedom Reign!”, at the occasion of the handover of power to the interim government. The note featured prominently in the US media. Some commentators find that the new government's rule contradicts the reign of freedom." pir 13:55, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: How's this? Do you want to go ahead and reinsert it in the article? 172 14:07, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I think it's an excellent (and, in the end, NPOV) illustration of the article, connecting several important issues (legitimacy, the US view, the conflict of this view with reality, decision-makers in the background).pir 14:24, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, though it looked out of place until the caption. Good job! 172 14:41, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "Let Freedom Reign" Image
Talk:List of national governments

message: I've added: all of South America, North America, Central America and the Caribbean. Secretlondon 01:14, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Attention moderators. I don`t actually get the sense of the Column 3 as people contribute standard English terms there. Since you do not distinct between a cabinet and a council of ministers strongly (see cabinet), let's regard all those institutions as cabinets. As a political analyst, I see the following ways to fix this:
* splitting the cabinet article according to the distinction between parliamentary and presidential republics, then encouraging Wikipedians to specify the exact type of each national government;
* specifying the original (national) names of each government, e.g. Cabinet Ministriv in Ukraine. --AlexPU 15:30, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sense of Column 3? 

message: I'm adding dates for the governments. I'm not sure what I should put for countries where the rightful government was overthrown. Like for Argentina. According to the guidelines, it should probably be 1853, when the most-recent constitution was installed. But the current line of democratically elected presidents only dates back to 1983. The president of Argentina page says that non-elected presidents of Argentina are not recognized by the government as having been presidents, so I guess 1983 is the more proper date. Just like how France's presidency was interrupted by Napoleon or whoever. Not exactly the same because Napoleon declared himself emperor, but you get the idea. Zhinz 02:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Governments 

message: I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions, which will hopefully lead to a consistent naming standard for national government cabinets/ministries. See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#Naming of government cabinets/ministries to take part in the discussion. /Slarre 12:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming standard for government cabinets/ministries 

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 13:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Discussion
Talk:Simon Brett

message: Is Mrs Pargeter named after Edith Pargeter/Ellis Peters?
Is Mrs Pargeter named after Mr Peters? No. Okay it's the male pseudonym for Edith Pargeter, but the Mrs suggests a definite woman... 86.184.25.19 (talk) 22:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: These aren't books in a series, but that's no reason not to have an "Other" section that lists them (and any others I haven't come across):
*Dead Romantic (19860 
*The Penultimate Chance Saloon (2006) 
*Singled Out 
-- John Broughton   (♫♫) 01:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book titles not in the article 

message: The section about the radio/audio drama versions of the Charles Paris books mentions that So Much Blood apparently happened in between the two serials preceding Dead Side of the Mic. 
But I'm re-listening to Dead Side of the Mic now, and while Charles says that he's been and the Edinburgh fringe (like in So Much Blood) he says it was a one-man play about the life of Swinburne (whereas in So Much Blood I think it was a one-man play about the life of Thomas Hood). 
Besides, I'm pretty sure he has a different agent in So Much Blood. Sonic.Screwdriver192 (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio: So Much Blood
Talk:The Dark Tower

message: Warranting any further discussion on it I'm changing the description of Stephen King's Dark Tower as a media franchise. A fictional media franchise is a character or series owned by a corporation, studio, committee or otherwise for which the right are purchased and sold and various forms of media and merchandise is created by an assortment of other companies. (ie. Marvel makes Spider-Man comics, Sony the films, various different companies make the toys, video games, clothes). My explanation does not mean there needs to be mean to be many forms of media for the character only that many companies own the rights to the character and they are up for purchase and barter. Stephen King is the sole owner of the characters he created, and all fictional works over seen by him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danleary25 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen King's The Dark Tower is not a media franchise
Talk:Aspect

message: I removed this link because it doesn't even contain the word "aspect":
* Epithet is an association or element of a particular deity with a different name than its bearer
According to the article that it links to, "a deity's epithet...generally reflected a particular aspect of that god's life and role." As far as I can tell, this is just a generic use of the word "aspect", meaning the same thing as "characteristic" or "element", and not a specialized term.  I don't think this disambiguation page is intended to link to every single article that discusses aspects (i.e. characteristics) of something -- it should only link to articles that use "aspect" in a specialized sense. --WillNL 15:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite a few articles use the term "aspect" in a religious context to describe a particular manifestation or conception of a deity or other divine being. This doesn't seem to mean the same as "characteristic" or "element", or match the existing wiktionary definitions. I wonder whether Aspect (religion) might be worth creating.Klbrain (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Epithet

message: This description seems like an advertisement to me.  I should think "a subsidiary of Kaplan Inc. focused in helping students with their international study programs" is a sufficient description.
Mizike (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kaplan Aspect
Talk:Francis Scarpaleggia

message: which party? Secretlondon 03:19, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article seems to have quite a bit of bias strewn throughout it. A couple of examples:
* From 2011 to 2021 he served as the chair of the National Liberal Caucus, an eventful period in Canadian politics that saw the Liberal Party of Canada move from third-party status in the House of Commons (second opposition party) to forming government in one election cycle under the leadership of Justin Trudeau.
* He holds a reputation as a dedicated constituency representative, close to his electors and focused on their political concerns and priorities.
Thanks. 514Charlie (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI / bias