Talk:Thomas Cavalier-Smith

message: Have added short, factual temporary page with full list of author's publications and links to other relevant Wikipedia entries.
:: Temporary page updated, expanded, and set to main page.  Evolver 01:32, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Revised to possible copyright problems.  This is a simple verbatim replication of his International Prize for Biology write-up from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.  This makes it decidedly NOT neutral AND possibly a copyright issue.
Know where I can get his autograph?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.118.191.48 (talk) 07:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The image :File:Robert Whittaker.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Robert Whittaker.PNG

message: It seems to me there is entirely too much lead-in material describing the early classifications Cavalier-Smith builds on.  While context is important, most of this material belongs, and is found, under Kingdom_(biology) and could just as well be referenced (and merged if necessary) --Dmh (talk) 06:01, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of n-kingdom models 

message: To cite the controversy of his claims, I wrote on Bacterial taxonomy
 The higher taxa proposed by Cavalier-Smith (viz. [1]) are highly controversial and generally disregarded by molecular biology community (c.f. reviewers' comments on [2], e.g. Eric Bapteste is "agnostic" regarding the conclusions) and are often not even mention in reviews (e.g. [3]).
Can this statement be re-used here? --Squidonius (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: I think that the box and his data are incomplete. Where was he born? It isn't written.
Should be all data to increase the quality of the article. Thanks.--179.37.136.248 (talk) 23:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete box and data 

message: Now deceased as of 3/19/21 - Looking for something I can cite publicly  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.190.227 (talk) 00:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Where did you get this information? Microtubules (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I just saw it announced in twitter, they link this as source -> https://www.protistology.org.uk/t-c-s . I edited the page (I hope I did it correctly). --Feministo (talk) 22:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Recent edits have referred to Tom as "Smith". He has been known as Cavalier-Smith throughout his education and professional career as that is his surname. I propose to edit accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spathaky (talk • contribs) 11:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname Cavalier-Smith