lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Protected titles/Historical list of titles/Old SALT 2

message: 
Three pages listed here actually exist, as redirects. Are they meant to be on here? – Gurch 10:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Protection has probably outlived its usefulness for these 3. Resurgent insurgent 17:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pages that exist 

message: Please remove Mygot from the salt list. A recent DRV for myg0t concluded in recreating the article, so I'd like to recreate this redirect. --- RockMFR 18:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done. — Carl (CBM · talk) 22:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mygot
Talk:Postimees

message: This article seems non-neutral. Phrases like "brings the best of investigative journalism and weekend events to the readers" are clearly biased.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.124.213 (talk) 18:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: we have link Postimees na Russkom Yazyke. Options: individual article, the redirect to Postimees or the redirect to List of newspapers in Estonia? Entry in ESTER: --Estopedist1 (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postimees na Russkom Yazyke  

message: The editor-in-chief was changed today but as it's only mentioned in the infobox, not in the text, there wasn't really a good place to link the source (1). --Ehitaja (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: New chief
Talk:Novel of manners

message: I think this page is a little limited in its discussion of a Novel of Manners. It has only Western literary tradition, which whilst the Novel of Manners is a result of this tradition it is not the only literary timeline to have a definitve novel of this type. I think this article should be developed to include novels such as Hong Lou Meng. What do the editors think? 137.205.222.240 (talk) 18:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

message: The article seems to suggest that the main character in the end abides to social codes, but in the examples given, like Gatsby and Pride and Prejudice, the opposite is true. Could someone clarify?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.42.107 (talk) 07:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kind of conflicting? 

message: There are two articles on types of novels, both terms used to describe the novels by Jane Austen, in particular. This article, and for Sense and Sensibility at least, Comedy of manners. Are these the same thing, to be merged? The differences are not jumping out at me, but may appear huge to others. It would be good if each article linked to the other, pointing out the differences. For now, I will use this category on all of Austen's novels in the infobox, adding it where not already in the genre list.  --Prairieplant (talk) 11:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel of manners and comedy of manners, what is the difference? 

message: From https://www.britannica.com/art/novel-of-manners:
"novel of manners,  work of fiction that re-creates a social world, conveying with finely detailed observation the customs, values, and mores of a highly developed and complex society"...
I think Wikipedia shouldn't copy Britannica, right? Matteozanin (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britannica has the same identical description!
Talk:New Technology Institute

message: Hi Erebus555  
Thanks for letting me drop a link to the Manchester New Technology institute page from your New Technology Institute article.
I was just wondering the reason behind 'cleaning up' one of the external links to the NTI Blog?
I must admit that I do not know the complete external link policy of Wikipedia and I don't want to break the rules, but the NTI Blog is an credible news source of the NTI's activities. If you can point out where we went wrong it will prevent us from making the same mistake again.
Regards,   
(ManchesterNTI 10:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blogs are generally considered to be unreliable links per WP:EL, so whilst they may actually be quite good sources of information, Wikipedia does not find them reliable to be used in the encyclopedia. - Erebus555 10:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the advice. Regards, (ManchesterNTI 10:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:BFI IMAX

message: In May 2009 it seems to call itself BFI IMAX rather than London IMAX. Rod57 (talk) 11:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Ethnic joke

message: Professor Christie Davies, author of this theory, has posed the main arguments in his article Ethnic Jokes, Moral Values and Social Boundaries, published in 1982. His approach is based on Victor Raskin's (1985) Semantic Script Theory of Humor, or to be more precise, on the arguments connected with ethnic humor on binary oppositions.
So, uh, in the above sentence, how did Christie Davies base his approach in 1982 on something that happened in 1985?--2600:6C51:447F:D8D9:71C0:EACD:1843:F925 (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  temporal issue
Talk:Yongchuan, Chongqing

message: But I do not know how to make it. I could upload the photos and videos (in VGA and/or half VGA- ASF format -any Winows PC can play it) on one of my servers, i.e. provide a download link for those who know how to intergrate this files. Of course I made the photos/Vids myself (in Winter 2006/2007). Most photos are of low quality, because shots are done by actualy a video cam.
(Edgar8 (talk) 07:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I could provide many pictures and videos of Yongchuan and surroundings
Template talk:Impressionism

message: I propose moving the template to :Template:Impressionism in line with the main article title. Tyrenius 10:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK with me.  go ahead and do it. Remember 13:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: (I may be wrong but) isn't the painting on the side of this template a Turner? Turner wasn't an impressionist (although some may argue that he was a proto-impressionist). Anyway, maybe consider changing the painting.--58.107.253.14 09:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The painting is Impression, Sunrise.  See the following from the Monet article: In 1872 (or 1873), he painted Impression, Sunrise (Impression: soleil levant) depicting a Le Havre landscape. It hung in the first Impressionist exhibition in 1874 and is now displayed in the Musée Marmottan-Monet, Paris. From the painting's title, art critic Louis Leroy coined the term "Impressionism", which he intended to be derogatory, however the Impressionists appropriated the term for themselves.Impressionism — Overview ARTinthePICTURE.com. Retrieved 6 January 2007.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Remember (talk • contribs) 13:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turner painting
Talk:Gehenna (World of Darkness)

message: Can we get descriptions of the different Gehenna scenarios?  Mathiastck 10:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add these descriptions. --Loremaster (talk) 02:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gehenna scenarios

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Role-playing games#Category:Vampire: The Masquerade where a discussion is occurring about merging pages in this category.  --Craw-daddy | T | 12:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am opposed to the deletion of the Gehenna (World of Darkness) article. --Loremaster (talk) 04:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So am I. Vampire: The Masquerade is one of the most notorious role-playing game lines in the history of this hobby, and this article is both 1) relevant enough to remain in Wikipedia (because of the importance of this concept to the overall in-game setting) and 2) long enough to merit it's own space. 200.92.97.132 (talk) 01:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed.  This article exists in the correct location (within the role-playing section), format, and length to constitute remaining as is. Thebreadline (talk) 17:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: It was done because all the Vampire: The Masquerade articles are routinely listing as non-notable, and in fact after the last major discussion of Vampire: The Masquerade, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Role-playing games#Category:Vampire: The Masquerade, it was decided that not only were there too many articles for the game but most should be merged. Unfortunately, the end result was someone went and mass deleted most of the articles.
I was not trying to be destructive or destroy content. I am a huge fan of Vampire: The Masquerade, and have been trying to restore a lot of the deleted information that shouldn't have been deleted in the first place and am now actively working to fill them with second and third party sources and links.
The merge was done more to prevent another mass deletion like what happened last time, by trimming the amount of excess articles. Already people are re-adding notablity tags to all the V:TM articles (even those with third party sources), and Gehenna (World of Darkness) is still listed as non-notable even a year after the tag was added. As all three articles only had first party sources, it made sense to increase their notability by merging them (likewise we need to add the secondary and third party sources to each of those pages). If you have an idea as to a different article they all should be merged into, please do so.Flygongengar (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Merge
Talk:Todd Beamer

message: Note: This article was created September 21, 2001, but was erroneously moved to Lisa Beamer on June 19, 2007.  The material relating to Todd was then cut and pasted back into this article.  By doing so the history was wiped out on Todd's article.  For the complete history on this article prior to June 19, 2007, please see here.--04:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2007

message: The site "Intelfiles" published a phone record from Todd Beamer on Sept 11, 2001. You can see it here: http://intelfiles.egoplex.com/2001-09-29-FBI-phone-records.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.208.115.126 (talk) 11:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: FBI Phone Records

message: The statement that the passengers were able to "successfully foil the hijacking and reclaim the aircraft" is not correct.  The hijackers crashed the plane when they believed that the passengers might be about to reclaim the plane.Royalcourtier (talk) 03:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hijacking was not foiled 

message: Please change the following line: A hijacker shouts, "Allah akbar!" ("God is great").
The actual phrase shouted by the hijacker was, "Allahu akbar!"
Although it may sound like just, "Allah akbar", this is merely because, like in the English language, many word syllables sound shortened or missing in spoken speech.  When we say, "I parked my car in the garage", it may sound like, "I park my car in-th g'rage."
"Allahu akbar" is the actual phrase shouted.
Nangasaur (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording in the article is what the source reflects. Do you have a source to back up what you're saying? - Aoidh (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2014 

message: I did some minor copyediting and in the process, I fear I may have screwed up the citations. I "undid" my own edit, but I'm not sure that helped (note to self: learn more about citations). Could someone double-check? ChiHistoryeditor (talk) 23:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messed up citations? 

message: An editor recently changed this article and the corresponding article on Mark Bingham to add "According to popular media" to accounts of Beamer and Bingham's actions. They argued at my talkpage that the actual events were unknowable, and that "popular media" accounts were not reliable sources. I disagree - the cellphone conversations are widely documented, and there is no doubt concerning the actions, as a group, of passengers on UAL93. The article states "According to accounts of cell phone conversations," which is ample attribution and well-supported. The calls, their content,a nd the outcome are well-supported in the 9/11 report, which, however, does not mention individual names. That does not preclude the inclusion of well-documented material from other sources, or require that we waffle about it in the article. Acroterion (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-06-18/Technology report

message: What was the max signature length before the setting was changed? Jon Harald Søby 11:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The signature length limit wasn't implemented before the change, so there wasn't a limit other than how much the servers could hold, I expect. The setting was given its default value of 255 because some value had to be selected. --ais523 16:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I see. /me wishes that en.wp would get a rule disallowing colourful signatures. They are extremely annoying. Jon Harald Søby 22:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Could anyone who knows how this works please look at Portal talk:Current events#Edit intro feature enabled and show us how it works? You could also link to it from this report. Carcharoth 12:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit intro feature enabled
Talk:Lower Marsh Market

message: Proposal to merge has been in existence since September 2014, with no apparent interest. It would seem, therefore that a merger would not be controversial and I therefore :-
*Support The market is a part of the Lower Marsh area and is not significantly notable enough to warrant its own page. Both articles are little more than stubs really and merging seems appropriate. Eagleash (talk) 13:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge article with [[Lower Marsh]]
Talk:SECR N1 class

message: "The rebuilding of the prototype in 1930 provided an opportunity to apply the Southern Railway's new system in which Maunsell's 2-6-0 locomotives were renumbered into one sequence." Er, how so? The renumbering was not confined to the 2-6-0s - all that happened was that all locos with "A" prefix dropped that and were increased by 1000, except for class Z which simply lost the "A". Dealing specifically with the Maunsell 2-6-0s: the locos previously A610-A639, A790-A880, A890-A900 became 1610-39, 1790-1880, 1890-1900, so the same two breaks in sequence existed before as they did after. The final batch of U1 merely followed on with 1901-10; and the 1932-34 build of class N were nos. 1400-14 so definitely outside that "sequence" - if there had been any desire to produce a sequence, those 1932-34 locos could have been nos. 1640-54 (all but one were blank in 1932, and no. 1654 became available in March 1933 with the wdl of ex-LCDR class B2 0-6-0 of that number). --Redrose64 (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the wording to reflect this. Ning-ning (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Score four

message: Among the links are Solved games. AFAICS Score four is not solved yet, or else? --Glasreiniger 11:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Regarding the image description: “Selfmade” is not a correct word. Self-made, or perhaps handmade or handcrafted is preferable. 183.88.130.122 (talk) 08:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2024
Talk:Mīmu Iro Iro Yume no Tabi

message: Just to say that the french release was limited to the 52 first episodes. Ref KrebMarkt 16:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only 52 eps in France 

message: Did the English version ever air anywhere? The English voicetrack is clearly audible in some episodes of the Serbo-Croatian dub, so an English dub obviously must exist.--173.206.224.79 (talk) 03:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Version?
Talk:Business case

message: Removed the following text:
:: Note that it is not the job of the project manager to build the business case, this task is usually the responsibility of stakeholders and sponsors.Building a Project’s Business Case PM Hut, 8 January 2009
Whether or not a project manager makes a business case depends on the context in which the case is made (e.g. organization type, structure, etc). The reference to a random blog article is not reliable. -- cmhTC 13:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed reference to project manager
Talk:Nintama Rantarō

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 10:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: The IP editor 108.192.97.195, as well as Rama.hermawan, have been inserting extremely long lists of very minor characters which really don't belong in this article. Farix and I have been trying to keep them out of this article, but we don't want to create an edit war. So, IP/Rama.hermawan (as they are likely the same person), please explain exactly why they need to be in this article. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 04:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to do a two part edit. First removing the patent trivia: age, sign, blood type, body measurement, uniform color, etc. The second is to remove the clearly tertiary characters. —Farix (t | c) 15:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Please stop edit warring. If you revert the edits to your preferred version again, you may be blocked from editing. We need to come to a consensus here on this page before any further edits are made. Thank you for your cooperation. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 08:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

text: What makes are those characters major? Their descriptions suggests that they play very minor roles in the plot and are not significant. And there are far too many of them for the article in too many subsections. Character sections should not list every character that appears in the series, so stick to just the main characters. —Farix (t | c) 11:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

text: But which ones are important? The list should be limited to just the central characters. —Farix (t | c) 13:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endless lists of tertiary characters 

message: Why was this moved? I don't think the official English title is the most common name, at least not yet. Raymond1922 (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:GWR 4000 Class

message: OK, so some were rebuilt in 1923, but when were they originally introduced? How can this article be missing such a vital (and obviously required) piece of information?
EdJogg 11:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good point. The table of individual locos show that (ignoring North Star) they were introduced at the rate of one a month starting February 1907. North Star was built 1906 but it was always non-standard and for the first year or so acted as a test bed. So I'm going to add "introduced from early 1907" to the introduction.OrewaTel (talk) 09:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing information
Talk:Bumble Hole Branch Canal

message: Or Boshboil? Mr Larrington (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed it to Boshboil, as this is what the images use, and both the OS 1:2500 map and Nicholson Guide call it Boshboil. Bob1960evens (talk) 13:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bushboil? 
Talk:Types of energy

message: This article was earlier the main article on Energy. However, since several editors were more comfortable with the Energy (physics) be the main article after some minor modifications, this has been renamed as Energy (Disambiguation) since Energy (disambiguation) already existed. I have a suggestion to rename this article as "Energy in general". Any comments or suggestions are invited. Hallenrm 12:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with these ideas ("Energy in general", and the "Energy Links" title that you actually moved the page to) is that their purpose is the same as that of the disambiguation page. "Energy (disambiguation)" really means "a general page that links to more specific pages on energy"; the consensus to move Energy (physics) to Energy shows that most of the editors here believe the current Energy page to be a description of "what people usually mean when they refer to energy". The move to Energy Links prompted an AfD, which I have now closed because the page has been merged to Energy (disambiguation) and the history shouldn't be deleted under the GFDL. However, the page should not be recreated here. Working more on the Energy (disambiguation) page (including incorporating some of the information that was lost in the merge, if you'd like) might be your best course of action if you are interested in retaining a bit more of this article. Dekimasuよ! 04:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A new title for this page
Talk:GWR 2900 Class

message: Article gives the introduction dates for the prototypes, but omits the dates for the production examples. This would be useful.
EdJogg 12:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More detail required

message: I am not sure how to deal with the infobox as the different series have so many differing dimensions (loco weights, tractive effort, wheel wheel base, wheel arrangements etc. etc. Can anyone suggest what to do?Das48 (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: If you think that Lady of Legend needs more prominence, or to be included in the main table, please discuss first. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not go into the main table, because it's a replica. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony May (talk • contribs) 05:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Lady of Legend''
Talk:Pontifical University of John Paul II

message: Could this "issued a Motu proprio Beata Hedvigis in virtue of which the Pontifical Academy was created" be explained?  As it stands, it's a complete gobbledygook.--Jotel 12:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --Poeticbent talk 15:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks --Jotel 15:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English, please 
Talk:Witness statement

message: The article doesn't mention confidentiality.  In England, the witness statement becomes confidential the moment it is signed.  Even the witness making the statement is not entitled to a copy.  If a person commits a crime, the name of any witness is given to the accused (or their legal representative).  pgr94 (talk) 11:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confidentiality