lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Epilogue (Justice League Unlimited)

message: Over half this article is taken up with trivia. This needs to be corrected. If the article itself isn't can't support its existence, then I'll put it up for merge. CovenantD 14:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that.--Gillespee 14:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: In over two years, this article has not improved, everything here is sourced to an unreliable source which uses itself as a reference over and over. As such, i'm redirecting to the list of episodes. Find the original secondary source in which the quotes were published before restoring. ThuranX (talk) 16:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Dayan

message: Anyone looking for Dayan by surname needs to find him.
It's one extra click to get to the Bet Din article.
The disambig is more useful than a simple redirect. --Dweller 14:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moshe Dayan is not ambiguous to Dayan. White should be about the color, not the thousands of notables named White! They're not ambiguous! Dayan is no different. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For crying out loud:  - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed no-one'll link here for Moshe Dayan. I was concerned for people searching (c.f. my recent edit on Grace). Anyway, your argument is persuasive. I do however believe you were reverting without talk in the first place, but it's not that important. You just caught me in argumentative mood. Sorry. --Dweller 14:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:German submarine U-48 (1939)

message: The quote under reference No. 18 is not reliable. It is taken from a secondary source, a Daily Mirror-report about a book taken from the context. Can anyone verify the original source, i.e. the book? 
--HC Stempel (talk) 11:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote
Talk:Tom Weir

message: I have removed the stub notices. I consider that the article is no longer a stub. Capitalistroadster 14:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub notices

message: I didn't realise Weir's Way linked here until after I'd linked it. I think the show itself warrants an article, what with it having run for so long (and I don't think combining an article and a biog is a good idea). Chris Cunningham 14:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The DVD's out now, so it should have a complete listing. I dare say there must be someone out there who has a lot of information on the show, it ran for the better part of forever and it's a national treasure. Chris Cunningham 12:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for Weir's Way? 

message: There are parishes in Scotland by both names.  All sources list Kilmaronock, not Kilmarnock, and this map shows Kilmaronock as near Drymen.  So I believe we should list Kilmaronock until there is evidence (something more than a editor insisting) that it should change. --Siobhan Hansa 13:07, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kilmaronock/Kilmarnock

message: This article states that "He was buried in the same plot as the ashes of his sister Molly", but the article on Molly Weir states that her asses were scattered at Loch Lomond, suggesting  that they were not "buried in [a] plot". What is the truth?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr5357 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Burial
Talk:Alberta Highway 11

message: Is there a source for this piece of information? It seems a little far-off to be talking about turning the highway into a freeway 45 years from now. Are you sure the correct date isn't more like 2020? 68.145.238.33 14:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2050?

message: It seems that the stuff on Hwy 11A could easily go here - most of Hwy 11A is just an alternate route running parrallel to Hwy 11. Anyone else have two bits on the matter?  --Mr Minchin  19:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Railway crossings are very important to someone who would want to drive on the highway. They serve as great landmarks and may help people be better aware of them. I added them, but the were removed. May I re-add them? Also, the causeway over cygnet lake is quite an important part of the highway. It crosses Sylvan Creek and serves as a sanctuary for ducks and other birds. May I re-add that too? Abraham lake was also on this article for years, but it seems to have also been removed. Other lakes the highway passes by have also been removed. Abraham lake is a popular tourist attraction and I think it should be re-added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beejsterb (talk • contribs) 00:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please review WP:RJL#What to include. Railway crossings are not identified as things to include. Also, while crossings of major water bodies are things to include, Cygnet Lake is certainly not major. Abraham Lake was probably removed when this article was updated to comply with WP:RJL. Since the highway doesn't cross the lake, it should not be included within the junction list, but could definitely be mentioned it the "Route description" section. Hwy43 (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway Crossings and the Cygnet Lake causeway
Talk:Episcopal Vicariate of Great Britain and Ireland (Patriarchal Exarchate for Orthodox Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe, Patriarchate of Constantinople)

message: Dear Dcn Andrew,
The title of this article is not adequate - there are potentially many 'episcopal vicariates' of the Exarchate. According to the Exarchate's own statutes, a particular episcopal vicariate is defined by 'geographical territory'. Since THIS episcopal vicariate is defined by 'Great Britain and Ireland', this geographical specification must be included in the title of the article. At present, the title is incomplete - it is like having an entry on 'the Russian Orthodox Diocese'. The title is incomplete and must be supplemented.
Also there are NO official documents of the Exarchate in which this vicariate is given the title 'Episcopal Vicariate of Orthodox Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe'. So it is a completely unofficial title. It is a cumbersome shorthand which should not be the title of an encyclopedia article.
Best, M
: *shrug*  I agree that it's an inadequate descriptor.  It's also the only name I've seen used for this group.  Considering that the article was originally titled by its creator Diocese of Amphipolis, this would at least seem to be an improvement.  Perhaps when the Exarchate officially incorporates the group under some particular name, it can be updated.  
:  Are there any other vicariates within the Exarchate?  —A.S. Damick talk contribs 14:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Give 'em time!  :)  Unfortunately, there are a goodly number of established dioceses in the world whose names have nothing to do with their actual geographic locations.  I'm continually distressed by all the language of "local church" used to describe ecclesiastical organizations which really do not seem to have any boundaries at all.  —A.S. Damick talk contribs 14:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Following our discussion above, I've merged this article's contents into the Patriarchal Exarchate for Orthodox Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe article, as a subsection. The article in its new subsection form is essentially the same as the latest version here; only a few elements have been changed to account for its new location (i.e. links, wording in reference to Exarchate, which is now described on same page).
I'd suggest that any future edits be made to the entry  in its new location, not on this article -- and we can use that talk page for discussion. Assuming there are no problems, we can turn this article into a redirect in a day or so.  —Antonios Aigyptostalk 15:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Have spent some time on this today, and have taken care of sorting out various redirects across the system. I think it's safe to go ahead and turn this page into a redirect. —Antonios Aigyptostalk 21:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Exarchate article
Talk:Jibber-jabber

message: I wanted to propose this for deletion, but damned if the phrase doesn't have 270,000 hits in a google search. --Xyzzyplugh 14:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: discussion

message: Would this not be more suited to wiktionary? You can give origion and meaning for the word/phrase without having an encyclopedic article for it that has almost no content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.170.48 (talk) 07:45, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree ... this entry would be best served by applying the  to point readers to wikt:jibber-jabber, similar to what is done for our entry at Cool beans. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic vs definition
Talk:The Stranger (1973 film)

message: The current article needed a division between its story and its production and other elements, especially after I added an explicit statement about the film's appearance in MST3K. I'm not too happy with the phrase "Behind the scenes" as an umbrella term for all these non-story elements, but it was better than the alternatives I could think of. ("Trivia" is overused; "Other" is just plain unsatisfying.) I invited folks to consider other possibilities. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections
Talk:Charles Sturt

message: I noted a recent reversion of an edit because the tagging wasn't working.  For ref tags (ie  and ) to work, the footnotes section needs to be set up at the bottom of the article using the following:
== References ==

For more info see meta:Cite.php#How_it_works --A Y Arktos\talk 02:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref tags 

message: Does anyone know where his parents came from? The name Napier is Scottish, and "Sturt" looks like an adaptation (perhaps post-Jacobite) of "Stuart". --Mais oui! 19:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australian Dictionary of Biography says "...his Sturt and Napier ancestors were both Dorsetshire families...". Gimboid13 23:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scottish ancestry? 

message: I'm considering rewording this sentence: "Several times the party was in danger from the Aborigines but Sturt always succeeded in appeasing them", as the word 'Aborigines' isn't used much, if at all in everyday speech, with some regarding it as offensive. B 897 (talk) 06:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewording
Talk:Conflict: Global Terror

message: Jones is a rifleman? I was under the impression he used sub-machine guns? Nismojoe 14:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: can't stand this game, i was a fan of the whole conflict series... until this one
It was developed by the BRITISH, so you had a choice of whether you were delta or 22(SAS); in this your an american rapid reaction anti-terorrist global unit, i'm not anti-american, i'm just un-happy when america take our idea and make it sound like it was one of theres.
Yes i understand conflict: vietnam had american squaddies fine, that was americas war, so of course it was gonna be based on american serviceman, but for the sake of fairness surely in this version they could of still kept it as either 22 or delta; not all singing all dancing america taking on the world single-handley i mean come on!
next point the weapons are to say poor would be to much of a complement, bradleys base assault rifle is attrocious you can't do anything with it, the next-gen sniper rifle can't take someones head of from 15m away what chance do you have at long range?
the handling of the troops on the screen is jumpy awkward & they removed the automatic aim so you have to go in to aim mode find your target and open fire, where as because the enemy AI has increased dramatically your dead before you know where the first round has come from
81.103.80.39 17:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflict global storm 

message: I edited Foley and Sherman's descriptions to include medic. For anyone that has played the game, these two heal other characters in 1/3 the normal time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.144.177 (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medics 

message: 1. Jones uses C4 and SMG such as MP5 and uzis
2. Storm and Terror are different games!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.191.66.225 (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict Global Storm and Terror 

message: In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field includes "PC".  I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the "Supported platforms" section of the  Vgclegend template.  For example, if Conflict: Global Terror only runs on MS-DOS, then Conflict: Global Terror's Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.
ProResearcher (talk) 03:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Nightmare (Marvel Comics)

message: We really ought to get a better image than the Dr. Strange #52 cover. It doesn't really show the character in question. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better image
Talk:List of symphony orchestras in Europe

message: Isn't it awkward that both this page and that category page exist independently on Wikipedia without at least linking to each other? I would go as far as to suggest they are redundant and one should be deleted.
Some entries include links to orchestras' home pages, but not all. Should we add links to home pages for all orchestras or remove all such links, provided they appear on the orchestras' individual wiki pages?--S.Camus 20:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. See WP:CLN. 2. I've removed the links, see thread below. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

text: That depends on who you ask. The editors who maintain the US and worldwide lists, restrict the contents to "blue-links only" (for various reasons). I've removed the ELs and added  tags here (See thread below), to prevent a similar purging, because I believe redlinks are healthy on a list of this topic-type (ie not blatantly commercial, and not infinite/gigantic in scope). -- Quiddity (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Assistance in removing the chamber/concert orchestras would be warmly appreciated. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments

message: See this diff for a large cleanup of embedded official/external links. (Per WP:EL and various other guides). However those links could be handy for finding RSs to add, and for adding to the orchestra's articles when created. Hence noting here for reference. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: EL cleanup

message: There is no Vatican Orchestra. Usually concert in Vatican City are played by the Orchestra Sinfonica Nazionale della RAI (Italian radio Orchestra). Lele giannoni (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vatican

message: Are redlinks allowed here? In most other list articles redlinks are not allowed. What's the consensus here? Contact Basemetal here 10:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:CSC - red links are definitely allowed in list articles, but should ideally be referenced. See also the other two primary symphony orchestra lists (List of symphony orchestras in the United States and List of symphony orchestras). –Quiddity (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links
Talk:Treaties between Rome and Carthage

message: Over the past couple of days I've translated the entire article from the Italian (it:Trattati Roma-Cartagine).  I'm currently going back over it to try to make it read better in English.  My Italian's pretty poor, so I'm not entirely sure I've caught everything, and would greatly appreciate anybody that speaks Italian making sure I haven't left out something important, or misinterpreted the original.  On the other hand, the Italian original has a lot of extra information and some things that read a lot like OR or opinion, and I've been trying to cut that out.  Again, any help appreciated. —Ryan McDaniel 14:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a native Italian, so I'll give a try. BTW, I've noted one of the two maps in the Italian article has not been placed in the translation; why did you decide it was better not to put it?--Aldux 15:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  See discussion below on maps, but basically I thought that although they convey useful information, the maps as drawn didn't really live up to the Wikipedia standard.  If I have some time this weekend, I'll try to draw better ones to replace them. —Ryan McDaniel 16:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

text:  Thanks, by the way, for taking the time to look it over.  Rude of me not to have said so at once.  :-)  —Ryan McDaniel 17:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

text: No problem, don't ever be afraid of contradicting me, or of doubting of my edits; while I am, as I said, a native Italian, my English isn't so brilliant, and I agree on your objections.--Aldux 00:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation from the Italian

message: The maps on the Italian article are okay, but could definitely be better.  Eventually I'll get around to making some, but if anyone else has or knows of better maps to use right away, that would be great. —Ryan McDaniel 14:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Maps

message: According to M. Cary in the Journal of Roman Studies,pg. 71 of the 1919 edition, there was also another treaty in 343BC that was left out by Polybius either because it was unflattering to Rome or because it was lost somewhere in the disorganized Roman archives. However, the treaty was mentioned by Philinus and its context by Livy. Yet, I am not certain why Cary does not mention the treaty of 509BC, which is mentioned by Polybius. I don't know if this helps anyone, but I thought I might say something.   Saepe Stultus 03:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Treaty
Talk:Vic Elford

message: He had a best finish of sixth but two class wins? That seems contradictory. Wouldn't a best finish of sixth prevent him from having a class win? Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 22:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In the "24 Hours of Le Mans" infobox, "Best finish" indicates the driver's best overall finishing position in the race. In 1973, Elford finished 6th overall but won the GTS 5.0 class. (He also won his class in 1967, when he finished 7th overall). DH85868993 (talk) 06:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Le Mans
Talk:Data architecture

message: Could someone rewrite the article's first sentence in English, please?  Otherwise I'll just delete it since it's pure technobabble.  DEddy (talk) 17:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has put a better intro sentence; I agree about the original one so I deleted it. -- Beland (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  English please
Talk:Fack

message: Do we really need this article? It was redirected to Curtain Call: The Hits once before, as it was basically cruft, and it hasn't improved at all since then.
I'd say redirect it again. Comments anyone? Suntiger 14:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added notability and music stub templates to this, as per the last AfD. Eventually I'm going to be WP:BOLD and redirect it, since no one seems to care. Suntiger 13:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently there is a more specific stub template. Good! Suntiger 13:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over 10 days since I asked for comments on whether or not we should redirect, and nothing doing so far. Therefore I'm going ahead and doing it. A note: I reverted cruft and added a lyrics page link (which seems to be what the one other contrib since 7 July wanted to do inline with the article), just in case anyone wants to revert my redirect. Suntiger 18:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I don't really think you can say "Medium considered the song to be..." cuz literally anyone can post an article on Medium. ᗞᗴᖇᑭᗅᒪᗴᖇᎢ (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medium
Talk:Sancta Civitas

message: I created this page more to have a place to talk about the piece than to cover the piece in great detail. I just put down the bare bones that came to mind readily.
I know this was RVW's favorite among his choral works, but I for one find it maddeningly inconsistent. The beginning and the ending are terrific, no doubt about it, but the whole "Babylon-the-Great-is-fallen" business just goes on and on, in my view. There is also one passage (the last big climax of the work) where there are about a dozen measures as I recall that got re-written between the p-v score publication and the recordings, but I can't find any information on why the score hasn't been re-engraved, let alone published in an orchestral format. Wspencer11 14:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

message: What does it mean to say it is based on texts from Revelation, "as well as Taverner's Bible"? Presumably it is meant that one of the sources is the Book of Revelation as found in Taverner's Bible? MathHisSci (talk) 13:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taverner's Bible
Talk:James Holland (North Carolina politician)

message: Not to be confused with James Holland (historian)  and author of several books. DFH 14:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 
Talk:Forced landing

message: Thanks to User:Matticus78 for pointing out that there's an existing article called Emergency landing.  I searched for Forced landing and Crash landing before starting this article, but didn't think of that one.
In its current state, the Emergency landing article is little more than a checklist of the kind that student pilots memorize — it doesn't look much like an encyclopedia article.  Perhaps the best choice would be to delete the current contents of that article, merge this one (Forced landing) into one section, and add a Precautionary landing section as well, then redirect everything to Emergency landing.  Comments? David 14:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that seems a sensible way to do it. Salvage any usable content from Emergency landing before combining, and put a redirect at Precautionary landing unless/until there's enough content for precautionary to get its own page. ~ Matticus78 16:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. David 17:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I took the bold step of unmerging, as there have been cases in which airliners have been forced to land after intruding into the airspace of a hostile foreign power. It seems nicer to force the plane to land, rather than to shoot it down. Both the Israelis and the Soviets in the 20th century seemed to get a kick out of shooting down airliners, justifying it on the grounds of "spying" or something. 
This article will show that there are alternatives - not that I'm recommending anything - and if others will help me, I'd even like to figure out how often the peaceful alternative is taken. --Uncle Ed 00:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Un-merge

message: I think the discreption of a forced landing in this artical could be better, for one I would describe landing because of poor weather or because of potential engine failior (ie. low oil pressure) a precausunary landing as the landing is a choice and not forced (even if it is the only good choice). --Si Co15 (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure
Talk:Jeffrey Spender

message: Glad to see that Spender finally got his own page. I would include a picture, but I would most likely screw it up. Any volunteers? Marikology 14:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kaleidoscope Superior

message: I'm going to go ahead and remove the trivia section on this page. AgPyth (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Casey Royer

message: Casey Royer's Official Myspace Profile: http://myspace.com/dioc
:This should go in the main article. Downstream 16:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: something is wrong with the number of kids and/or their ages/dates of birth (and the corresponding links).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:57:6E20:6819:223:14FF:FE8C:EE10 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  family