Talk:Baise-moi

message: We do not appear to have any representatives of the "seventh art" on our featured articles list yet. I think this one is close to being worthy. Suggestions on what this and other articles about films need are very welcome. Self-nom. Pcb21| Pete 15:00, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Baise moi]]

message: The initial wording of the article held the point of view that the CE acted under political pressure. In reality, the law, as it was written, specifies X classification for movies containing pornography and/or extreme violence. The movie had both realistic sex and very realistic violence, and thus there were valid legal grounds for such classification. Thus, I think it is unwarranted judgment on the part of the article to claim that this ruling was made "under political pressure"... In addition, it seemed to claim that the CE is subject to political pressure, which is itself a highly debatable issue. I changed the article accordingly. David.Monniaux 23:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litigation before the [[Conseil d'État]] 

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: " (or "to shag" if the word translated into British English) "
removed, due to the fact that nobody in any part of the UK uses the word shag for anything, with the exeption of carpet salesmen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.205.93 (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed dumbness. 

message: :Image:Baise moi US video title.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Baise moi US video title.jpg

message: I've just watched this (uncut version) and its clearly not a pornographic film, as described in the first sentance.  There is more violence than sex.  Suggest replacing pornographic with sexually graphic.  The description \pornographic\ implies that the primary purpose of the film is the viewer's erotic gratification ... and this is clearly not the artistic focus here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.30.55.233 (talk) 23:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PORNOGRAPHIC ????? 

message: Daeg Faerch and his mother, Mickey Faerch, claim to be "talking with producers to be in a sequel" to Baise Moi. However, there seems to be no other sources than a FB status. Can it be added or should it wait until a more reliable source? PF4Eva (talk) 23:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sequel? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Baise-moi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080613115931/http://www.elonet.fi:80/title/ekksue/tarkastus to http://www.elonet.fi/title/ekksue/tarkastus
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Baise-moi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120819180211/http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/8E0BF2F09CD362E8802569FF004EE71D?OpenDocument to http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/8E0BF2F09CD362E8802569FF004EE71D?OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120819180241/http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/E4E5FF070511653480256C9F002E2418?OpenDocument to http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classified.nsf/0/E4E5FF070511653480256C9F002E2418?OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213084812/http://www.bbfc.co.uk:80/releases/baise-moi to http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/baise-moi
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.conseil-etat.fr/ce/jurispd/index_ac_ld0024.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified