lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Muricopsis espinosus mariae

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Muricopsis octogonus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mark Pinkosh

message: I don't think this bio page qualifies for an article - authors have not demonstrated subject is notable on at least two counts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexanderbm (talk • contribs) 21:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Lepsiella scobina

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Template talk:Pop rock

message: Glam punk and Glam metal are not forms of "pop rock" music and there are no sources to suggest they are a product of pop music. - TheOnly ones (talk) 20:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Is there any reference or guideline as to what constitutes "pop rock"? This template appears to be a random assortment of rock genres. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree -- 82.209.225.13 (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Ditto --Ilovetopaint (talk) 15:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this template determined?
Talk:Thais (gastropod)

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 17:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Traffic Crossing Leeds Bridge

message: Wouldn't this be better as a simple redirect to Louis Le Prince#Leeds Bridge (LPCCP Type-1 MkII) ? CultureDrone (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. I am not sure you can find tons of info on a 2 second film, even if it is the first.  Pharmboy (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed. Well, I've asked the originator of the article (Hamilton365) if they'd consider changing it to a redirect - let's see what they say. CultureDrone (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The originator has agreed a redirect would be better - will edit page. CultureDrone (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Tournament Players Club

message: The "at"s and "of"s should be removed from the courses in the TPC Network as part of a rebranding effort from 2006.  This rebranding also included adding a pill box around the TPC logo as is done for the PGA TOUR logo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.241.190.32 (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia normally follows common usage when naming articles, and while redirects are created for variations, links normally go direct to the article. A google search wil give you a rough guide to the overriding common usage, for example "TPC Myrtle Beach" generates around 8,000 ghits, whereas "TPC of Myrtle Beach" generates over 51,000; "TPC Louisiana" 22,000 ghits, "TPC of Louisiana" over 84,000. Should you see an overwhelming need to remane an article, you could request that it be moved on it's talkpage stating your reasons. wjematherbigissue 14:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is pretty obvious but the name "TPC at Sawgrass" generates 27,400 hits where as "TPC Sawgrass" generated 116,000.  The name has changed just like the Sears Tower is no longer the Sears Tower.  I think it is appropriate to list the course by the name that is used by the PGA TOUR.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.241.190.32 (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there still a question to which name is right?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.121.155.222 (talk) 21:17, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Cultural depictions of George Armstrong Custer

message: The "Films" section is very messy, particularly in the lower sections, so I put a clean-up request tag on it. It just needs to be formatted better. Rychach (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: The suggestion keeps appearing on the web that Peckinpah and Heston intended the character of Dundee to be based on or related to Custer - but these suggestions appear in articles utterly without substantiation or sourcing.
This is an extremely dubious claim. Heston and Peckinpah were both great readers, especially fascinated with the history of the western expansion. Considering that there is virtually nothing - I reiterate, nothing - in the character or actions of Amos Dundee that remotely resembles any aspect of the historical (or even the Hollywood) Custer - it is highly unlikely that either of the two would distort any representation so completely, and any such references as this need to be elided until proper substantiation can be provided. Sensei48 (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "Major Dundee" 

message: He's a recurring character in the Far Side cartoons. 68.175.94.200 (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Larson's Far Side 
Talk:Hat Works

message: How is this low importance? Stockport was a vital part  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.245.136 (talk) 08:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: COMMENT

message: John Lombe could not have renew his patent in 1732 because he died in 1722, supposedly from an assassin hired by the Italians from whom he stoke the design of the silk thrower.
Perhaps it was his brother or some other relative? Or the date of the patent renewal is wrong?  ObadiahKatz (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Lombe Was Already Dead in 1732
Talk:Karadiya Rajput

message: Someone recently added  but they did not give a page number. Usually, I would tag with  but in this case I have removed it because that entire series of books has been repeatedly shown to be problematic, mainly due to its unacknowledged plagiarism from British Raj sources. - Sitush (talk) 20:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , how are you doing? It's been a long time since I interacted with you. Hope you're well. I think you did right in removing the source. I've gone ahead and added a few sources. I have also used Singh's two sources carefully. Can you please give them a look and check out the addition? Your review would be beneficial as I don't have an idea of Indian history. Please remove liberally whatever I have added, in case you feel it is out of place. Warmly. Lourdes 02:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: I've removed Singh's two sources; the other sources seem to be enough. It would be lovely if you could review the rest. Warmly. Lourdes 02:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, I can't see many of those sources but it is definitely an improvement. I was meaning to do something about this article but it has repeatedly fell down my to-do list, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 11:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source 

message: kardiya rajput are not list in central list of obc.check the http://www.ncbc.nic.in/user_panel/GazetteResolution.aspx?Value=mPICjsL1aLuo5Ww%2fEcQPqeqoATXAB7p%2fQEBF7wOoZVUZeNdA4Fs5xoHN3KPmF8ST. ,ncbc has no reference of kardiya or kardiya rajput.vandalism of this page is happening. Jadeja97 (talk) 19:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central list of obc 

message: Obc list of NCBC and sebc list of state of gujarat are totally different.. Jadeja97 (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obc status  

message: Restore pervious version with reference. User : HinduKshatrana is promoting is own agenda and removed reference & try to target perticular community, WP:AIV Jadeja97 (talk) 17:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Harlow Aircraft Company

message: Mor info on history and development would be of value. •Jim62sch•dissera! 17:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: expand
Talk:Andy Hull

message: We should incorporate the stuff from user:AndrewwHuull (assuming it's verifiable, of course). DS (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More material 

message: His participation in this album would be in his discography Skysong263 (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris Jackson “Wilted”
Talk:Manga Bible (series)

message: We mentioned the word manga once and never made a link. What's the big deal. Just like my Dad (talk) 19:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the word has been removed. I've started a discussion on the project to confirm that this meets the criteria for being considered manga. If so, I'll be fixing up the article to reflect that better. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga? 

message: I've renamed the inflammatory sounding "Allegations of Anti-Judaism" section name to reception to be more neutral and in keeping with the MoS. However, it is lacking in neutrality due to its one-sided presentation of a single person's view. The sections needs to be full fleshed out with equally positive and negative views, and everything checked to be sure it comes from a reliable source. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: presently these are listed in publication order, however some have renumbered them in order of the biblical events they portray, https://nextmanga.com/ for example goes:
*Book 1 – MANGA MUTINY – The story begins with Rebellion in the heavens and failure on earth.
*Book 2 – MANGA MELECH – Escape from Egypt to crowning of the greatest king on earth.
*Book 3 – MANGA MESSENGERS – From Solomon to the decline and eventual exile of Israel.
*Book 4 – MANGA MESSIAH – The climax of the series – the birth and death of Yeshua.
*Book 5 – MANGA METAMORPHOSIS – From Yeshua’s departure to the wild and treacherous adventures of the early church
I think we should have a second ordering column for this. ScratchMarshall (talk) 06:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that's necessary. For the casual reader, order of release is sufficient. If they are familiar with Biblical canon, they will recognize that the order is not the same. We already list the associated books of the bible for anyone who is curious, and that can be compared to a bible anywhere. Granted, this is the order that I keep them in on my bookshelf. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:48, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: alternate order
Talk:Halls of residence at the University of Bristol

message: Unite house? Mr Daw (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would guess it's not listed here since it's not run by the University, it's a separate privately-owned development.  It's not clear though ... Tim (Xevious) (talk) 15:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: Can anyone confirm the University Hall date? I was at Churchill from 1975-1976 and stayed at the university until 1981 and I am pretty sure that there was no University Hall then. I am certain it did not exist in 1975, as there were just the four Stoke Bishop halls: Churchill, Wills, Hyatt-Baker and Badock. Could it have been built in 1971 and acquired by the university later? Or was it split from one of the other halls?
KeithC (talk) 14:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 
Talk:Turbinellidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Mitridae

message: Part of this article was based on the corresponding article in Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 , which is not compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. This article has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Invertzoo (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Volutomitridae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Onchidella patelloides

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1. It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Bilby (talk) 03:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Eubranchus rubeolus

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hearty White

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 13:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: David Morris (musician) →  – Seems to be the WP:COMMONNAME, and there is at least one other potentially notable musician named David Morris (the sing "Dutton Ranch Freestyle" has charted on Billboard). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Support: Sounds like a decent idea! I am fine with this. --Giacomo1968 (talk) 02:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Support per nom MRN2electricboogaloo (talk) 01:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 August 2022
Talk:Fordham Graduate School of Business

message: Hello. My page (a work in progress to be sure) is up for speedy deletion, but I am trying to create a page about Fordham University Graduate School of Business. So far there is no promoting or advertising going on, and I would like to know why it was marked. I have two paragraphs and already have three legitimate reference. Everything was fine until I put in a subheading of "Statistics and Ranking" that would highlight the school's standing in national publications (with references). But since this potential deletion, I am going to stop working on the page until I hear more. Please let me know if I can continue to work on this page to create a legitimate and fact-based page on the school. If you still feel that this is infringement on Wiki's rules, please let me know why.
Many thanks,
Fordcam (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Justifiability of proposed speedy delete