lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pepper Steiger

message: Whoopsie! On my old monitor, the image looked of poor quality. But after using my new one today (old one died on us), I can see the image was better quality than I originally thought. Sorry about changing it before! ^_^; Hardcore gamer 48 09:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image.... 
Talk:Angitia

message: This is not in the cited source, nor is it in Heinrich Brouwer's Bona Dea, the sources and a description of the cult. There might be a somewhat tenuous Cerean connection, according to Barbette Spaeth in The Roman Goddess Ceres. I'll take a look around, and see what turns up. Haploidavey (talk) 00:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Bona Dea connection seems to come from the redoubtable but not infallible Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, based on a passage from Macrobius with which you will be all too familiar by now (Saturnalia 1.12) and Servius, note to Aeneid 7.750. Macrobius doesn't mention Angitia; Servius does. I haven't looked at it closely, but I'm guessing there's some kind of commutative property going on here: Servius connects A to B, and Macrobius connects B to C, so therefore A[ngitia] must be connected to C (=Bona Dea). That's what I'm guessing anyway; those seeking The Truth make these kinds of leaps, one finds. The Dench material is interesting; I've only added some of it. She mentions the inscription where Angitia is described with cerialis, or such. Cynwolfe (talk) 01:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connections to Bona Dea?
Wikipedia talk:WikiElf

message: Hey everyone.  You'll notice I made some changes to this article as well as Wikipedia:WikiFairy and Wikipedia:WikiGnome and all three of the articles' related cats and userboxes so that certain things were similar across the Wiki Woodland Creature articles.
These aren't really content changes, but things like making sure all of the pages linked to the other two in a See Also section, or making sure that all three articles always capitalized the first letter of whatever came after wiki or making sure that all the articles had the same type of info on their respective userboxes.
In the same line, I tried to keep the format of the userboxes and the category pages similar.  I wrote descriptions for the category pages lacking them, and made sure that form stuff was the same on all of them.  I also changed the userboxes so that all of the userboxes had linkes to the category as well as the article (only one or two of them had before).
Anyway, like I said no real content changes--this pretty sums up what I did for all three articles except that I made a few additional changes to this article.  I moved the pictures for example due to formatting and where it made sense to put them and just some other minor formatting things.  Also, most instances of Wikielf had had elf lowercase, unlike the WikiGnome and WikiFairy.  I've changed this to be compatible with those two and for readability.  This involved moving the article.  I've also left a note for wikihermit about moving the userbox to a proper Wikipedia space like the other two articles.  Miss Mondegreen | Talk   09:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and you've improved the article considerably (I've been meaning to say 'well done' for that) and you beat me to reverting that subtle vandal - article merge indeed - the cheek. Cheers, Paxse 18:19, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the wiki woodland creature articles 

message: ...how did the wiki gnomes, elves, fairies and trolls get to be so called? I am prepared to accept an interesting beautiful answer rather than a boring true one, btw :) Totnesmartin 20:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just curious... 

message: The wikielf is just a superset of the WikiGnome...umm...pointless?  Anyone else notice how redundant and vague this article is?  So are WikiGnomes also WikiElves?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypergeometric2F1(a,b,c,x) (talk • contribs) 02:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This "race" is incredibly redundant and useless

message: The link to :Category:Wikipedian WikiElves goes nowhere.  Does it really exist, and if so where? 202.64.168.196 (talk) 07:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No such listing page
Talk:Kia Vaughn

message: The controversy should at least be linked to.
nappy-headed hos -> nappy-headed hos
--146.115.58.152 04:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did add a link to the Don Imus show article--SPhilbrickT 16:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I didn't do this. My impression is that Kia's suit was viewed as on behalf of the team, even if not a in a legal sense. To justify adding such a comment, you would need clear sourcing that the original suit represented Kia's views alone - if you can it could be added, but I'll be surprised if you can find such evidence. --SPhilbrickT 16:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add link 
Talk:YARV

message: I removed the last sentence stating that YARV has already become the official RUBY interpreter, because it was contradictory with the previous one, and also I think this is incorrect. Hervegirod 10:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YARV as official RUBY interpreter

message: I'm not really into wikipedia, but someone should edit this after reading , especially under the heading ko1.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.224.91.67 (talk) 21:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  good reference
Talk:Kidangoor, Kottayam

message: From this article I am led to believe that there are two villages called Kidangoor and one of these is separated into North and South Kidangoor.  They have famous persons associated with each village.  However, the way the article is written, the first Kidangoor and also Southern Kidangoor both claim Subramaniya Swamy Temple. Also, the first Kidangoor and also Northern Kidangoor has St. Mary's Church.
I suspect that there is only one Kidangoor and that it has a southern sectio and a northern section.  In that case the article should be rewritten, made more concise, and the famous persons all be lumped together under a section == Notable residents ==.</br>--User:Brenont (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there two different villages with the same name?
Category talk:GA-Class cycling articles

message: Nominated for GA review.  Hot topic.  When approved it would be a WP:DYK no doubt.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking for sources that relate to Femke Van den Driessche's biography.  Anybody out there got a line on that? Content additions to this article are needed and would be greatly appreciated. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Femke Van den Driessche]]
Talk:William Wailes

message: How does one know whether any of the information added to a page is valuable when the ridiculous person first blanks the page, then deletes factual stuff and leaves hanging prepositions, inserts information about Style under Biography, Deletes valid information about Style and in its place inserts material pertaining to a period 500 years earlier? 
--Amandajm 00:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting out info 

message: The list is potentially very long, and at the moment is not in any particular order and not all entries are referenced.
Would it be better as a realated /list article rather than in the main article?
--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 12:53, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of churches 
Category talk:Unassessed cycling articles

message: Nominated for GA review.  Hot topic.  When approved it would be a WP:DYK no doubt.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking for sources that relate to Femke Van den Driessche's biography.  Anybody out there got a line on that? Content additions to this article are needed and would be greatly appreciated. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Femke Van den Driessche]]
Talk:Francis Fitzherbert, 15th Baron Stafford

message: Help!  Not all that I entered has been included. Why is this?
wikibiohistory 10:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proton CamPro engine

message: too much "recently"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.170.165 (talk • contribs) 
Please remove the Supercharged Campro Engine section. There are no sources quoted and are just rumours. Misleading information not based on true facts or actual news.60.50.53.9 11:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aaron, if there are unsourced rumors in the article, be bold and remove them or put  tags on them.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:59, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Who came up with that term? a "Trilobite" is a form of fossil sea creature. I find various other references to it on Google, all of which are references to the CamPro engine, but it sounds pretty dumb to me. Seems that "tri-lobe" camshaft would be far more appropriate..45Colt 05:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trilobite" camshaft? 
Talk:List of vector graphics editors

message: I suggest to merge this article with Comparison of vector graphics editors —radiant guy 10:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: User Dreamyshade appears to have deleted a large number of drawing programs. Examples: iDraw, Zoner Draw, WinFig etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.107.119 (talk) 16:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to many programs deleted 

message: Presentation software, like Microsoft Powerpoint, is based on vector graphics editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.41.196.98 (talk) 23:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presentation software
Talk:David Asscherick

message: I just started this.  We have huge evangelists, and they should get pages here.
Rush4hire 10:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: did you add his arise online career Fibthejib (talk) 13:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: nevermind you added this in 2007 Fibthejib (talk) 13:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: I just checked back at this article, and was disappointed to find that someone has removed all the Wikilinks. This is a backward step. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 07:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilinks 

message: I have blanked the page and placed a copyright violation notice on it.  The content of the page draws heavily on sources easily found on the Internet.  If the sort of material found on this article were submitted as an assignment it would be failed for plagiarism.  I suggest somebody knowledgeable about David Asscherick start a new article, without drawing on material from other websites. -Fermion (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violations
Talk:Southsea Railway

message: The third photo on this page is not on the route of the railway. Nuttah (talk) 10:26, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Via Foundation

message: Hi, as I've said on the Via Bona Award Page, I'm trying to make this article more neutral in tone.  Any help/advice is truly appreciated.
Thank you in advance -
--Nadacevia 11:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:K. J. Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research

message: what is the procedure to take admission in PGDBM, MMS, and also its fee structure
How can someone claim this is among the top 15 business schools in India? At least without including any citation. I'm going to change that to 'among the top business schools of India'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anirudh51 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Nakhodka

message: There is also a major oilspil by a russian tanker called makhodka in japan in 1997, see http://www.erc.pref.fukui.jp/news/Eoil.html
The name of Russian corvette that discovered Nakhodka Bay literally translates as "America".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sea diver (talk • contribs) 01:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: A lot of what has been written about the supposed history of Nakhodka seems to have in fact ultimately originated from this single unsourced source  back in the year 2003, written by a Canadian IP editor  with a slight but obvious Japanese nationalist point-of-view; some of the claims-of-fact contained therein have now been contradicted by two articles, both of which have since (and now) been made available free of charge, and on-line, one being the New York Times and the other being the Sydney Morning Herald, both dated November 1987 (; ), albeit both originally from the same transcripts and both were of the same correspondent (Philip Taubman). In my opinion, it is probably more likely to be a bit of a hoax originally created by a Japanese university student in Canada, and then left undiscovered for the last 12 or 13 years! I don't know if I had actually managed to read this, for the first time, as being incorporated into the texts of one of Lonely Planet's Russia tourists' travel-guidebooks probably about 7 or 8 years ago! -- Urquhartnite (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible hoax and Wikipedia-only circular source
Talk:British Gliding Association

message: under - ROLE - the article says "The BGA still has the authority to manage most aspects of gliding in the UK" having immediately previously refered to it being an ordinary club. So how did it go from the former to having legal authority? what is the history of that ? An important omission i say
--83.105.33.91 11:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Puzzled.  Nowhere does it say that the BGA has ever been a gliding club.  It has always been the governing body since its inception. I suggest you re-read the article. JMcC 14:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Perhaps it isn't clear so here is an explanation. The British Government and the Civil Aviation Authority have never seen the need to intervene very often in British gliding. There is no automatic reason why the government should be involved, though in most other countries all aviation is supervised by a government department. The BGA started in the 1930s as a group of people who were interested in gliding and who helped co-ordinate the movement. It therefore assumed responsibilities for a new sport without anyone getting around to write a law to say that it could/should.  Since then no-one has taken away its responsibilities because it did a good job and there was no need to change the status quo. Self-regulation worked because responsible people operated throughout the movement. The result has been a system that is effective, free from bureaucracy and therefore cheap. Consequently British glider pilots still do not have government issued licences and the engineers have not been certified by the CAA. I doubt if the BGA is explicitly mentioned in any statute. Of course air law applies to glider pilots, so for example we have to stay out of prohibited areas, not indulge in dangerous flying and switch on our oxygen when we fly high. BGA also has to work with the authorities to investigate serious accidents, but until recently that is about it. Sadly things are changing. To comply with European legislation, new gliders have to display government registration letters and older gliders will also be registered eventually. Certificates of Airworthiness are also changing on 1 October for similar reasons but the details are not yet clear. An illustration of the effect is that one owner of a new glider recently had to pay 800 pounds to replace a functional ASI and altimeter because they each lacked a piece of paper. JMcC 15:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ordensburg Vogelsang

message: Hello Wiki users,
I translated the German Wikipedia article Ordensburg Vogelsang.
My native language is not English. Please correct my expressions and other things if wrong!
Hi, I visited Vogelsang this July and thought that your overview covered the most vital points about the complex. Really good summary and great atmospheric photos.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.26.177 (talk) 12:41, August 25, 2007 (UTC) 
I trained and was billetted for many weeks at Vogelsang, when administered by the Belgian Army. Unfortunately this "history" of the place is severely distorted. Its history and ending is much darker than the author describes. It was a college for SS OFFICERS. It also included an Aryan Breeding Camp on the lakeshore (which was still there in the 70s). The MILITARY Training facilities included extensive artillery, armour and heavy weapon ranges, complete with mock-ups of villages for specialised warfare. The podium at the centre of the sports arena contained a cell, from which jewish prisoners were released to make a dash for freedom across the sports field. The deal was that if the prisoner made it to the low wall at the other side, he would go free. During his run he'd be the live target for officers on the podium. In the 60s and 70s, when I regularly attended the Training Establishment, members of bereaved families would be admitted to offer their remembrance to their lost ones at the memorial plaque on the sports field wall. When I was training there, we were not permitted to enter certain areas, because the Waffen SS had boobytrapped much of the underground facilities.
There is an extensive history of the place, compiled by the Belgian Army; a TRUE history! The establishment was one of five SS Officer Training Establishments.
The article, as it is is a rewrite of history and false.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Old shorty (talk • contribs) 19:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fox's Peter Pan & the Pirates

message: I noticed that the programme's crew information and episode title list had been removed - surely this is stuff that would count towards an encyclopedic article about this show? Just wondering. 
KoopaCooper (talk) 08:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Episode list & production information definitely should be included, especially since it can't be easily found elsewhere. CFLeon (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed programme info 

message: Under "The Croc": "Not once Peter and the others only can handle with the pirates by using the Croc's help." What is this supposed to mean? There are several other instances of this sort- sentences without verbs, improper punctuation, etc. (On the other hand, this is the ONLY Peter Pan production that I know of that has the crocodile being female, as in Barrie's original.) CFLeon (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: Toyman’s Obsession 192.110.144.229 (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happy New Year
Talk:Nadezhda Mandelstam

message: Nadezhda worked for a journal called "For a Communist Education" at one point,
it seems.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.224.70 (talk) 13:53, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work 

message: The Russian, Ukrainian and Polish articles say 30 October, but English and many of the other major languages have it as 31 October. None of them show whether it's an Old Style or New Style date.  This and a few other sites say she was born 18 October 1899, which would convert to 30 October 1899 (the calendric gap in the 19th century being 12 days).  I'll make the change.  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 20:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Asarum

message: I believe that this disambig. page should be redirect to point directly to Wild ginger (a genus of plants with this name). My reasoning is that the only other topic listed on this page is Asarum Parish which does not currently exist. I am not even certain that Asarum Parish should have a link at the top of the redirected page for the same above reasons. Thoughts. Earthdirt 11:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

message: What's the  full form of "s.s." in Asarum s.s.
108.18.136.147 (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete 
Talk:List of Old Boys of Shore

message: As remarkable as it may sound, Errol Flynn did indeed attend Shore School North Sydney.  However the young Flynn was caught in a very intimate act with one of the maids employed at his boarding house and was expelled by L.C. Robson, the headmaster at the time.  Additionally, Robson ordered that Flynn's name should be struck from the official school register.  --Calabraxthis 11:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Errol Flynn
Talk:Tricolon

message: Therefore, isn't the example a tricolon crescens? And i thought the parts in a tricolon had to be of equal grammatical value? Storeye 11:52, 30 April 2007 (UT
Should Rule of three (writing) be merged here? It should certainly mention this article, at least. --213.89.227.151 (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Belginusanl

message: ;Further suspected sockpuppets
*Rigole appears to use the "jessica" theme in his usernames, and hosts a Jessica Alba fansite. He also is a fan of Little House on the Prairie, which was the subject of User:Albajessica's first post. Incidentally, do blocks on English Wikipedia apply to other Wikimedia projects? The user is also causing trouble on the Dutch Wikipedia - Gobeirne 12:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they do - the same user (I suspect some one with the Belgian nationality) is on 1 week block now ending today. The list of IP's and User names used on Wikipedia-nl can be found here. One IP is based in the US, another one in Italy (perhaps open proxies, I have asked for a check ITMT) MoiraMoira 13:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

message: A checkuser done showed more sockpuppets. Hence the updated file on names used (may give you guys clues for more name choices as well) can be found here. All accounts and IP's used have a perm block with us now. Best wishes, MoiraMoira 13:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update on Dutch wikipedia
Talk:Law of the British Virgin Islands

message: I have just put a short stubby article in for the moment to fill this particular gap.  A much longer article is currently in process in my Sandbox: User:Legis/sandbox/draft 1.  Any outside contributions are always welcome. --Legis (talk - contributions) 12:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is now more advanced than the draft in my sandbox, so let's just put all future revisions here directly. --Legis (talk - contribs) 18:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Colin Simpson (Canadian author)

message: If he is Canadian, the article should say so. --Eastmain 12:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian
Talk:Karmarkar's algorithm

message: Do you think any layman with a passing interest in super-computing can understand this?
-- unsigned by 24.56.163.174, 1 July 2007
: Seconded. Mostly I am missing a section with examples. What is this algorithm good for in real life? --BjKa (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Put into simpler english please! 

message: An article about "Karmarkar's algorithm" under the heading "The Algorithm" should present Karmarkar's algorithm and not something else just because the real thing is "rather complicated".
I don't really feel confident enough about interior-point methods to write anything for the article... I _would_ feel ok trying to give an explanation of Karmarkar's algorithm here in the discussion section first for review by some senior mathematicians... Does anyone feel like volunteering for fact checking anything I might put together?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.149.134 (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: This article is describing the affine-scaling algorithm, not Karmarkar's projective algorithm. Even the canonical form is lost, as are all the geometric ideas!
This is a better source.
* 
--  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 01:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate 
Talk:Die! Die! Die!

message: The CD liner notes of the album "Harmony" list that the album was recorded at Black Box, France in May 2011 with additional recording by Tom Healy in 2011.  However the article currently suggests the album was recorded late 2010.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.2.218.145 (talk) 04:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album "Harmony" - incorrect date of recording?