lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:FA Trophy

message: I was having a look at the Encyclopedia of British Football, published in 1983, and it states that (at the time) the previous season's Trophy finalists got byes to the first round of the FA Cup.  I'd never heard of this - anyone know if it was actually true, how long it lasted for, and id it worth mentioning in the article............? ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was definitely true - it was a carry over from when the Amateur Cup finalists were exempt (not strictly speaking "byes") to the First Round Proper. Two other non-league clubs were also exempt to the First Round, based on something like "past performances". I think it ended when all the Conference Clubs began to be exempt until the Fourth Round Qualifying - something like 1988 at a guess? - fchd (talk) 21:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The references to the FA Vase under "Format" were an error, which I have now corrected.  The only other reference to the Vase is where it states that clubs in some leagues play in the Trophy whereas those from lower leagues play in the Vase rather than the Trophy (I've clarified the wording of this ever so slightly.....) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trophy finalists getting byes to round 1 of the FA Cup.........? 

message: I added a list of all the competitions, as a section. It seems nice and compact, with the short item names, so I don't think it needs to be a separate page - at least for the next 30-40 years. Any disagreement? Onanoff (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of all competitions 
Talk:Paul Cummings

message: Parts of this article seem to be a copy from . What does anyone else think? --Stormbay 19:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy violation? 

message: Paul Cummings should not directly link to one Person because there are more presons with that name... --92.224.194.254 (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There are more than one person with many names on wikipedia.  First they must achieve notability.  Then if there are multiple people of notability, with written articles, we would disambiguate with a specification of what they are notable for.  Sometimes when one name is far more notable than others, we would directly link to that person with a hat tag (a note at the top of the article) to direct people to other choices.Trackinfo (talk) 21:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Cummings
Talk:Tegea

message: The statement that Tegea was conquered by Sparta by 560 needs reconsidering in my opinion. Hrdt I. 66 states: "Throughout the whole of this early contest with the Tegeans, the Lacedaemonians met with nothing but defeats; but in the time of Croesus, under the kings Anaxandrides and Aristo, fortune had turned in their favour ».  The taking (if absolute conquering can be assumed) of Tegea must then be placed during Anaxandridas’ reign which is about 560-525. So Tegea could not have been Spartan by 560, but rather by 525. 
 --Dimulescu (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Talk:The Ozark Mountain Daredevils (album)

message: I think that sonething should be added about there new tour. I'm not completely sure about the dates, but I do know that the first two shows sold out in about an hour. Akamaru Toshibo 19:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Tour 
Talk:Stage Fright (disambiguation)

message: Just so no one thinks I deleted anything, all I did was move the contents of "Stage Fright" to "Stage fright (disambiguation)", redirect "Stage Fright (disambiguation)" to "Stage fright (disambiguation)", and redirect "Stage Fright" to "Stage fright".  Sorry for the confusion.  --Bark 19:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the various links
Talk:Goole A.F.C.

message: The idea that the Goole AFC Forum has been deleted from the main page is that it is a passworded page which means it is not accessible for all Goole AFC supporters, until it becomes open to all it shall stay deleted, constantly reverting of this will lead to Warnings for Vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kewstu (talk • contribs) 20:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still a forum site which fails the external links policy also I suspect a conflict of interest here and so point you at Conflict of interest policy. Keith D (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goole AFC Forum 

message: :Now this is getting a little pathetic all round, you either can have links to websites to do with GOOLE AFC all in or you can have none external links policy, with the reason been all unoffical websites are a conflict of interest Conflict of interest policy. Please discuss this here and lets make a rational adult decision between us.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kewstu (talk • contribs) 16:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please stop warring over the external links on the article the large number of changes to these over the last couple of weeks is not good. Please improve the article content and forget about the external links. As stated previously there should not be a forum link, probably other articles need to be looked at but please do not go round removing links from other articles just to make a point. Keith D (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GOOLE AFC LINKS 
Talk:Stage fright (disambiguation)

message: Just so no one thinks I deleted anything, all I did was move the contents of "Stage Fright" to "Stage fright (disambiguation)", redirect "Stage Fright (disambiguation)" to "Stage fright (disambiguation)", and redirect "Stage Fright" to "Stage fright".  Sorry for the confusion.  --Bark 19:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the various links 

message: Currently, most visitors coming to this disambig page are looking for this:
* Stagefright (bug), a remotely exploitable software bug in the Android operating system
So, for the next month at least it would be good if some version of that link were at the top of the page rather than hidden at the bottom.-96.233.20.34 (talk) 12:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense, but alphabetizing the sections on disambiguation pages and putting "Other uses" at the bottom is the standard layout.  Moreover, there aren't multiple computing-related entries that would warrant creation of a separate "Computing" section. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have limited experience with the structure of disambig pages, but it seems like WP has a general article tradition of top-of-page somewhat-special-case inserts. That is what I propose here, leaving what is down below as-is for the long term. Especially warranted as long as google is not yet properly linking to the bug article. But I hesitate to be bold about this myself, since we are dealing here with a high-traffic user-interface matter. (The same comments actually apply to the Stage fright article, which now routes the whole world to the disambig page, which hides what the world seeks down at the bottom...)-96.233.20.34 (talk) 12:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Totally understood.  Unfortunately, hatnotes aren't supposed to be used on disambiguation pages, making them of no help for the disambiguation page itself.  I'm rereading the guidelines to see whether including an additonal hatnote on the Stage fright article would be allowed. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 13:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Voila! :)   should get us covered very well. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 13:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for the hatnote!-96.233.20.34 (talk) 17:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're welcome, and thank you for pointing it out! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 08:07, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stagefright (bug)
Talk:Stage Fright

message: Just so no one thinks I deleted anything, all I did was move the contents of "Stage Fright" to "Stage fright (disambiguation)", redirect "Stage Fright (disambiguation)" to "Stage fright (disambiguation)", and redirect "Stage Fright" to "Stage fright".  Sorry for the confusion.  --Bark 19:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the various links
Talk:Agios Ioannis Renti

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 03:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agios Ioannis Rentis →  – See the official list of Greek cities and towns provided by ministry of interior law as published in: "Αριθμ. 28549 – ΦΕΚ Τεύχος B’ 1327/17.04.2019"  (https://www.kallikratis.org/perifereies-perifereiakes-enotites-dimoi-kallikrati-kai-plithysmos/)
Actual list (pdf) at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oTn-r58caNNlFjD9-SAke6TBK7BjoEsJ/view?pli=1 
See entries in page 125 (codes are 105.430 and 16.050).
The actual name means St John OF Renti (or Renti's St John). Rentis was the landlord the area was named after. St John (Agios Ioannis) is the name of the church the town is named after. Hence it's St John Of Rentis. In Greek "of Rentis" is simply "Renti" as "Renti" is the genitive case of "Rentis".
Google maps has it wrong. Street signs have it wrong. People living there also often have it wrong.
The official list of the ministry has it right - as it must.
All associated entries or references containing "Rentis" must hence be switched to "Renti" for consistency (unless of course they refer to the land owner Rentis himself and not the area/municipality/town containing his name). Stelios21r (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 July 2023
Talk:Manezês

message: I think it's almost impossible that someone in Florianópolis would pronounce "dois" as [dɔf]. It doesn't even make sense. As a matter of fact, the pronunciation of "dois" as [doʃ] with a very strong [ʃ] is a recurrent source of mockery from outsiders who live in Floripa and find the accent amusing. I would go as far as to say that perhaps the "d" is pronounced as [d], instead of the normal Portuguese dental [d̪], because it does sound very different from Standard Brazilian Portuguese. RodolfoPiskorski 19:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dois
Talk:Alexander Zelenko

message: The only portrait I found is here. Copyright? go figure. NVO 20:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Perama

message: https://www.patt.gov.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4698&Itemid=288 2A02:587:8028:CF00:301B:C8EA:F852:E655 (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://www.patt.gov.gr/site/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4698&Itemid=288
Talk:Methana

message: I encountered Methana while reading Thucydides, and wondered what evidence exists for the wall he describes.Ebailey63 (talk) 04:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Sisteron

message: On 15 August 1944 French B-26 Marauder bombers and American B-17 Flying Fortresses...
Since the B-26 was built be the Glenn L. Martin Company in Baltimore, MD, I think it would be clearer if "French" were changed to "French-crewed" and since both aircraft were, of course, bombers I suggest:
 On 15 August 1944 French-crewed B-26 Marauder and American B-17 Flying Fortress bombers...
I leave it to whoever edits this page to decide what, if any, of these suggestions to addopt.  <B>☺</B> Dick Kimball (talk) 16:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   Suggestions for the History section 
Talk:Aigaleo

message: Kloas (talk) 08:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source, that is Verifiable and a reliable source? El Greco(talk) 21:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Kloas|Kloas]] ([[User talk:Kloas|talk]]) 08:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Brother Cities 

message: Egaleo is also a mountain which is in the west of Athens. See this page for further information.
Could we have the phonetics symbols because egaleo is not so easy to say....--Tours brun (talk) 11:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount and prononciation  
Talk:Anne of Green Gables: The Continuing Story

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article (and several related articles) were tagged as having conflict of interest issues because of edits made by employees of Sullivan Productions. Archived WP:COIN discussion now at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 26#Sullivan Productions-related articles. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: When Gilbert Blythe was joining the train to leave PEI for the Front, someone was waving a Union Flag. Nothing wrong with that, you say. It was the flag of Canada too until 1965. Well, yes, except that the someone was waving the 1707 Union Flag which does not include the St Patrick's Cross and which has not been in use since 1801 -- even on PEI ! -- Derek Ross | Talk 05:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronistic Union Flag 

message: This page is entirely unsourced, unsourced articles on Wikipedia can be removed. Jurrasic kid (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we delete this page?
Talk:Wendi Richter

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 23:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Why does her birthday list two different days? 71.58.133.27 (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wendi's correct birthday is September 8, 1960.  She has told me this in person on more than one occasion.  But someone keeps changing it back to September 6, 1961 which is not correct.  The world won't end if people think she was born on September 6, 1961, but she 1000% was not born on that day or in that year. 2603:7000:713F:81B4:785A:383E:3554:A0C1 (talk) 21:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday
Talk:Agios Dimitrios

message: Also a village in Kefalonia. How is it best to add this information?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Splendid entry (talk • contribs) 23:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rubin Carter (American football)

message: Is Carter African-American? I do not know. I read the article in the sources about his being made a coach at Purdue and it had nothing to say about Carter's ethnicity. All I know is that until somewhere in the text says that Carter is African-American, we should not categorize him as such.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  African-American
Talk:Rhetorical criticism

message: I have just added David W. Gooding who was emeritus Professor of Old Testament Greek (i.e. Septuagint studies) in Belfast (Queen's University), author of books such as According to Luke and True to the Faith - a fresh exposition of the Acts of the Apostles, both of which use rhetorical criticism to great effect.  DFH 07:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advocates include 

message: There is an approach to Biblical interpretation called "rhetorical criticism."  And "rhetorical criticism" is also the name of basic methodology within rhetorical studies, a scholarly tradition within U.S. Communication and English departments.  Despite their shared name, the two bodies of scholarship have little overlap.  I suspect that two separate articles are going to be needed--maybe "Rhetorical Criticism" and "Rhetorical Criticism (Biblical)"?Jeangoodwin (talk) 21:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed 

message: Added fantasy-theme, feminist, generic, and generative criticism to criticism approaches section. Added citation as well (Sonja K. Foss, Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice, 5th ed.). Aleon014 (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Approaches
Talk:Conceptual definition

message: How does this relate to a theoretical definition? --68.34.121.246 (talk) 00:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theoretical Definition? 

message: I merged the contents of this page to Theoretical definition during my mini-project of beautifying Operationalization
-Tesseract2 (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged to "Theoretical definition"
Talk:Ramification problem

message: Does this article describe an accepted solution to the ramification problem? ? pgr94 (talk) 11:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it describes a solution; I'm not sure any one has won out as "accepted". Many other articles also propose solutions in various formalisms; for example by Thielscher and Shanahan. --Delirium (talk) 10:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solution?
Talk:Irenicism

message: There's also an article at Irenicism that seems to have similar content.  Which is the right word?  Are they both acceptable?  Should they be merged?  Or should there just be a redirect?131.215.172.17 (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to most of the dictionaries I have looked at the word is spelled "irenicism" (especially the Oxford American Dictionary), so I have changed the spelling in the article. It can be changed back if more disagree with this spelling. I just wanted to be correct with what a lot of dictionaries have since that spelling might be more common to people because of that. Could someone change the article title to reflect the new spelling? Beaver72.171.0.148 (talk) 17:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: As the IP above suggested, it to me looks like these two articles should be merged.  Commentary?  GRBerry 01:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Argumentum ad captandum

message: This article doesn't seem like it explains much since it doesn't provide a clear definition of the topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.232.141 (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only that, all three examples are along the lines of invoking "all right thinking people". If this term is synonymous with "all right thinking people" let's say so; if not let's come up with some better examples. As it stands, this article is an unsourced definition, plus a couple of examples that do not even use the phrase. --MelanieN (talk) 03:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I just did a complete rewrite, with sources and sourced examples. --MelanieN (talk) 04:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe it's my failing but.
Talk:Mirror stage

message: The french version seems much more fleshed out. For instance, it blames the neologism on Wallon, not on Lacan. etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.10.74 (talk) 18:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallon 

message: "The mirror stage describes the formation of the Ego via the process of identification, the Ego being the result of identifying with one's own specular image."
:What if the society in which the child develops hasn't yet invented mirrors? The "Ego" can't be formed then, eh? :P 193.0.99.100 (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure this obvious to most right-thinking people, but...                                       ...natural mirrors? Like H2O?--Moss Ryder (talk) 06:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The mirror doesn't need to be literal... 68.84.235.198 (talk) 01:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirrors 

message: Most of the this article appears to be directly lifted from answers.com here so needs paraphrasing with more refs.  Julia Rossi (talk) 09:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upon mirrors 

message: This seems to be written from a purely psycho-analytical POV, thereby assuming there is factual value in psycho-analytical concepts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.53.222.35 (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  (lack of) neutrality 

message: This article tells a lot ABOUT the mirror stage- it does very little to explain what this concept actually IS. I can infer that it involved mirrors and childhood development,  but there is no comment about the child's mastery over its image, etc. This should be simply and explicitly stated in the first or second paragraph of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.130.194.101 (talk) 00:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition? 
Talk:Powerlifting USA

message: Hi.
I just created this as a stub, because (a) it's a topic of interest to me; (b) Ken Leistner is listed as a notable strength training writer (there was a bit of debate about this a while back, and the article made the cut); (c) both the editor and editor-in-chief already have Wikipedia articles about them; (d) the powerlifting article is quite long (and popular); (e) the powerlifting article is alread illustrated with a cover scan of this magazine, which speaks to the importance of the magazine within the sport; (f) Milo, Hardgainer, and other niche strength training magazines have pages that have survived deletion discussions.
I also note that the stubs for those other magazines (which, I think, I created back in the day) have - over time - been fleshed out into decent small articles.
In short: my plea is (a) this magazine is noteworthy enough within it's niche; (b) give it time to grow!
Thanks,
Tjic 19:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The existing Mike Lambert article is about a volleyball player, and the Andy Kerr article is about a Scottish politician.  I disambiguated the links so they no longer point to these people - they clearly aren't the ones affiliated with Powerlifting USA. Dsreyn 12:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)