lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nokia 3510

message: That is entirely the wrong phone in the photo. I'm removing it from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryisgood (talk • contribs) 19:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. User Kristoferb has twice replaced  with , which doesn't look like the the phone on Nokia's support page, or the 3510i sitting in front of me, or the results on Google. I don't know what the phone he's replacing it with, but I suggest that the image shouldn't be changed again - at least without discussion on here. --129.234.252.66 (talk) 13:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

text: ...Make that thrice... If you really think it should be changed, say so on here, give a reason, and wait for discussion. --129.234.252.67 (talk) 15:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Muhyiddin of Brunei

message: Muhyiddin (1673 - 1690) is the 14th Sultan of Brunei according to the Salasilah Raja-Raja Brunei. He was widely remembered for being the Sultan who ordered the creation of Salasilah Raja-Raja Brunei. Accordingly,1678, the Sulu Sultan sent about 600 warriors to Brunei and together with the Brunei warriors, planned to have suppressed a 10-year rebellion in North Borneo by the self-proclaimed Sultan Mobin. Led by two Brunei Nakhodas, Sayyid Nakhoda Perkasa Angging and Sayyid Nakhoda Sangkalang, both Brunei and Sulu warriors triumped and regain the said territory back to the Brunei Sultan Muhyiddin. In gratitude, the Brunei Sultan gave North Borneo as a gift to the Nakhodas (grandsons of Brunei's very first sultan Moh. Shah), and in 1704 ceded, as by the Nakhodas of Brunei, to the Sulu Sultanate as a tribute for the Sulu warriors . Nakhoda Angging was residented in Siasi, Sulu (naming his place there as Subah-Buaya, also known as Tong-tong and presently known as Duhol-Duhol) by the Brunei Sultan, given the Brunei Maharaja State Official Flag as Brunei Maharaja in the Sulu, known as Maharaja Anddin as an assured line of descendancy from its very first sultan of Brunei and Sulu (one and only person), Also given the Twin-headed Alligator/crocodile Flag as the brunei Sultan's twin-authority in preventing North Borneo from being further ceded by the suspicious and doubtful Sulu Sultan-Sahab'uddin; the latter instead ceded Palawan to the Spanish government in manila. Maharaja Anddin begotted Maharaja Adinda Taup, the latter being the father of Sharif Sultan Imam Ul-Alam Arpa. Visit www.royalsultanate.weebly.com and click Resolution 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.202.164.102 (talk) 08:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mumtaz Mufti

message: I've suggested that Alakh Nagri and Ali Pur Ka Aeeli be merged into this article as the books are apparently not notable enough in their own context without the subject of this article to warrant their own discrete article. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The word "accent" seems to be used incorrectly in this article. The CORPUS OF GLOBAL WEB-BASED ENGLISH (GloWbE) (20 COUNTRIES; 1.9 BILLION WORDS; http://corpus.byu.edu/) finds no usage such as seen here in its top 100 usages. All of these actually textual examples from around the world use the word "accent" to mean a peculiar pronunciation which differs from that of the "standard", e.g. "He spoke English with a Canadian accent." I do not think this article means that Mufti wrote with a vocal pronunciation which differs from the norm. He wrote in his native Urdu, and was deeply influenced by  Qudrat Ullah Shahab who also wrote in Urdu. From the context of the article I think the word wanted is "voice" which can also be expressed by the phrase "point of view"; or "accent" could mean here "unique personal way of expressing ideas." But in either case "accent" is not the word to use here. I do not want ot get into a reversion war, so if you disagree could you please explain why? Thanks. Nick Beeson (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 
Talk:Munir A. Malik

message: This article is a mess. If anybody reads it without knowing beforehand who this guy is (like myself), it's impossible to understand what's going on. For instance, is he alive or dead? What is he charged of? What type of politician is he? i.e. What are his political views?190.9.192.158 (talk) 23:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Way I Spent the End of the World

message: The article says that the two young people plan to swim to Bulgaria.  Are we sure about that?  I couldn't tell from the subtitles where they were aiming for.  It is true that Bulgaria would have been closer to Bucharest.  But from a political viewpoint, Bulgaria in or before 1989 was still a hard line communist state, and it would have made better political sense for them to have tried to reach the politically much more relaxed Yugoslavia. Nandt1 (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where are they swimming to?
Talk:Racket-tailed coquette

message: ...steal other species' nectar" "Other" suggests that other hummingbird species are  intended. Hard to imagine how this is effected, without some clue in the text.--Wetman (talk) 15:40, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to "other hummingbirds' nectar" per the source. HueSatLum 22:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nectar stealing
Talk:Pirre hummingbird

message: The naming "Rufous-cheeked" of this species was in contention and was voted down as an accepted name in August of 2007 by the S. American Classification Committee. The following was noted as the reasoning behind voting down the new name. "This proposal change the current SACC name, "Pirre Hummingbird" for Goethalsia bella to the newer "Rufous-cheeked Hummingbird", used by AOU (1983,1998), Ridgely & Gwynne (1989) and Sibley & Monroe (1990). I don't know who coined the latter name, but it seems to me to represent the epitome of useless tinkering with English names and an entirely unnecessary attempt to impose an Eisenmann-type "descriptive" name.
On the one hand, "Pirre Hummingbird" is a perfectly correct toponym taken from the type locality; the species has a very limited geographical range including only 3-4 isolated massifs in the Darién region of Panamá and the border with Colombia: use of toponyms in such cases is a useful indicator of a very restricted distribution, and the fact that the bird also occurs on a few adjacent mountains does not detract from this.
On the other hand, "Rufous-cheeked" is a singularly poor descriptor; the anterior forehead, lores and chin are rufous (or better, chestnut) but not the cheeks, thus the name is decidedly misleading. (The general effect is that of a bird that has just taken a drink from a cup of cocoa). Hence, I see no reason to perpetuate a poor descriptor with an established and adequate toponym already in place, and advocate the use of "Pirre Hummingbird" for Goethalsia bella, namely a NO vote. A YES would be in favor of use of "Rufous-cheeked".—Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.188.253.15 (talk) 16 November 2008
: The text above was quoted from , which is cited in the article (as of the time I'm posting this). According to , the proposal (#304) failed on 1 Oct 2007. - dcljr (talk) 08:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Sapphire-throated hummingbird

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Sapphire-throated hummingbird (Lepidopyga coeruleogularis coeruleogularis) male.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 9, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-08-09. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Murat Boz

message: Notable? DenizTC 15:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 

message: after para yok video clip, he made 2 more clips: 
1-)özledim
2-)herşeyi yak  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swordandstone (talk • contribs) 23:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  two more video clips
Talk:Thinley Norbu

message: A substantial amount of material was copy and pasted from this source. I haven't yet ascertained whether the site is licensed in a way that it can be used but even if it is it almost certainly does not qualify as a reliable source. I removed it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 August edit
Talk:John Ford Stock Company

message: Since this was not a legally named entity, should it be upper case? It was not the title of a book, movie, etc, only used informally as the "John Ford stock company"??? WikiDon 20:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The term is used so very frequently in works alluding to Ford's career, and with upper case in a large portion of those cases, that I think upper case is justified.  I certainly don't think it hurts anything or is wildly improper in this context.  Monkeyzpop 22:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm 15 years late to this discussion, but I recommend using lowercase. Ford had his regulars, but they were never formally incorporated into a "stock company". Hence, this is not a proper noun and should not be capitalized. --Jeremy Butler (talk) 10:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Upper Case? / lower case ?
Talk:Mushirul Hasan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Tyrian metaltail

message: My site BirdPhotos.com has many large photos of this species, including the Santa Marta blue-tailed subspecies.  VIREO is a commercial product with thumbnail size photos for purchase.  The probably self-promotion link has one photo.  Lynx seems like a valid external link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomfriedel (talk • contribs) 19:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a valid external link 
Talk:Vervain hummingbird

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Vervain hummingbird (Mellisuga minima).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 9, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-12-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Vervain hummingbird (Mellisuga minima).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Wedge-tailed sabrewing

message: In the August 5 2022 revision I have attempted to limit the information to the wedge-tailed sabrewing as defined by IOC, that is, the monotypic Pampa pampa. Much of the previous article, especially the information attributed to Williamson refers to the pre-split Campylopterus curvipennis and is not specific to P. pampa. I have therefore replaced the more general text. I have also blanked the section on song evolution but retained it at the end. I suggest it more properly belongs in the Hummingbird article, as it is not specific to the wedge-tailed. (The one mention of wedge-tailed refers to the Sierra Madre Oriental population, which is the curve-winged.)   Text was copied from this source, which is available under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Craigthebirder (talk) 13:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 5, 2022 revision
Talk:Falciform ligament

message: The first picture of the liver, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gray1085.png , is drawn mirrored. The correct anatomical picture of the liver would show it with the left side on the right and right side on the left, which it clearly isn't in that picture. This is very strange since it's from an anatomical book, and these usually don't make mistakes of this kind.
Note also that the second picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Illu_liver_gallbladder.jpg of the posterior side of the liver is depicted upside down. The gallbladder is sticking out on the top side of the liver which is incorrect. The correct way to flip an organ to se its back side in anatomy is through the other axis of rotation, where right becomes left and vice versa.
:The first image that you are talking about, gives the view of the superior surface of the liver and not the anterior view and therefore is actually not a mirrored image. DiptanshuTalk 09:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect depictions
Talk:Sterna

message: Least tern (Sternula antillarum) does not appear in the list on this page, but the species page for Least tern identifies it as belonging to Sternula and does not mention any taxonomy disputes. Raran75 (talk) 06:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Least Tern (Sternula antillarum) Is Missing from List
Talk:Sooty oystercatcher

message: Bookmarked , , ,  and . For later. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Haematopus fuliginosus Bruny.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 16, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-10-16. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 09:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Haematopus fuliginosus Bruny.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Haematopus fuliginosus - Doughboy Head.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 22, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-01-22. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Haematopus fuliginosus - Doughboy Head.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:New Zealand dotterel

message: Given that we follow IOC, which is lumpy when it comes to this taxon, and the IUCN is rather splitty, is it accurate to describe it as critically endangered? That's referring to the Stewart Island population, not the wider taxon as a whole? Maybe we need a "see text" in the taxobox? Sabine's Sunbird  talk 20:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Species status

message: As the project standard for species and subspecies names is the IOC, it is proposed that Northern red-breasted plover and Southern red-breasted plover be merged into this article. Loopy30 (talk) 15:03, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned them all up a bit, so hopefully they can all stay...let me know what you think....following IOC taxonomy....Pvmoutside (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that they should be kept separate as things seem to be going that way with the authorities. But in general, subspecies should be covered at the species level articles (unless extremely notable somehow, in my opinion). FunkMonk (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Charadrius obscurus aquilonius - Point Chevalier.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 12, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-12-12. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: Hello, this is a suggestion to correct the taxonomy reference. There is an earlier article by Barth et al. (2013) that found the relationship that is cited here as an article from 2015. The correct text/reference is:
A 2013 study determined that its closest relatives are two other New Zealand plovers, the wrybill, which was found to be in the Charadrius CRD II clade, and the double-banded plover.
 Transglycosylase (talk) 22:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct the taxonomy reference in "Taxonomy and systematics"

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: New Zealand dotterel →  – IOC 14.1 update ——🦝 The Interaccoonale Will be the raccoon race (talk・contribs)  01:37, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 December 2023
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Ludovicapipa

message: Well, this RFC sure is going nowhere fast. :P — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem with RfCs in obscure articles: Very few people have been "stung" by a user to rally other people to look at the situation, which makes a situation where a user stings one other user repeatedly, hard. I'm about ready to close this RfC up. What I don't know is if I should bump it up to arbitration for sanctioning or just "keep it as evidence" if she acts up again. Considering it's a relatively minor number of parties involved, I'm assuming if it did go to ArbCom, they'd deal with it relatively quickly.--Dali-Llama 19:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can take it to ArbCom if you feel it's a pressing enough matter, but if Ludovica is now leaving you alone, it might be in your best interest to just let sleeping dogs lie for now.  If she starts causing you trouble in the future, then by all means point to this RfC as one of your pieces of evidence that you tried to resolve the dispute. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 19:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No response from anyone?
Talk:HMS Hecla

message: There is another such ship which you have omitted.  The torpedo depot ship HMS Hecla was launched at Harland and Wolff's shipyard, Belfast on 7th March 1878.  Reference: M MOSS and J R HUME 'Shipbuiders to the World: 125 years of Harland and Wolff, Belfast'.  Blackstaff Press, Belfast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.89.75 (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another HMS Hecla
Talk:Khensur Lungri Namgyel

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070602160916/http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2003/1/22-2_4.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  02:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cerulean kingfisher

message: I found that the Alcedo coerulescens page was redirected to Alcedo Atthis. I undid this as they are two different species. See for example http://ibc.hbw.com/ibc/phtml/especie.phtml?idEspecie=3364. Alcedo coerulescens is an Indonesian species which is blue above and white below and is called Small Blue Kingfisher or Cerulean Kingfisher in English.
Thouc (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, the confusion was mainly caused by the Indian bird pictures and references in it. Shyamal (talk) 02:06, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcedo coerulescens is a different species from Alcedo Atthis 
Talk:Nabadwipchandra Dev Burman

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Paradise kingfisher

message: :fr:Tanysiptera says there is a :fr:Tanysiptera nigriceps, which doesnt appear on this list, and the local page Tanysiptera nigriceps is a redirect to Buff-breasted Paradise Kingfisher, created by user:Jimfbleak. If they are the same, this should be explained somewhere. John Vandenberg (chat) 01:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanysiptera nigriceps 

message: Paradise-kingfisher diets consist of small insects such as grasshoppers, beetles, cicadas’ snails in addition to small lizards, spiders and worms.Legge, Sarah and Heinsohn, Robert. “Kingfishers in paradise: The breeding biology of Tanysiptera sylvia at the Iron Range National Park, Cape York”, Australian Journal of Zoology, vol. 49, 2001, pp. 85-98, ResearchGate, doi: 10.1071/ZO00090. Adult paradise kingfishers feed their young invertebrates up to the maximum size of 3 cm in length depending on the age of the chick. Legge, Sarah and Heinsohn, Robert. “Kingfishers in paradise: The breeding biology of Tanysiptera sylvia at the Iron Range National Park, Cape York”, Australian Journal of Zoology, vol. 49, 2001, pp. 85-98, ResearchGate, doi: 10.1071/ZO00090  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolabear (talk • contribs) 23:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diet
Talk:Nabila Jamshed

message: This page was nominated for deletion last year.  Since that time I don't see evidence that it's passed, and in fact, some of the sources from last time have disappeared from their main pages and from the [www.archive.org web archive].  Amazon does not have a copy, I don't know if there's an ISBN, no attention seems to have been paid since the initial publication push and google turns up 1000 hits, the top of which are blogs and wikipedia mirrors.  I'm thinking about prodding it.  WLU (talk) 16:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability again 

message: The sole link I've seen to a sales site has no publisher on it and the blog does not mention a publisher either.  Who published the book?  Is it self-pubished?  That'd make it vanity press.  WLU (talk) 14:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher 