lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chandragupta II

message: chandragupta 2 and his love life
chandragupta vikramaditya fell in love with a beautiful young princess called dhruvswamini who he had won over in a war against her father , the king of madra currently known as punjab but unfortunately while chandragupta was fighting in a war against the shakas his brother ramgupta took over the dynasty since their father had died of illness and chandragupta was unaware of this .he had also forced dhruvswamini to marry him which she did helplessly inspite of wanting to marry chandragupta.
later when chandragupta came back he realised this and went back to ayodhya where he ruled for about  5years until he got an opportunity to take revenge on ramgupta got back what belonged to him - the gupta kingdom as well as dhruvswamini.
chandragupta later on also married kubernaga in order to keep relationships with the nagas
this article is written by sharmin bhagwagar
WRITEN BY VIVEK SINGH  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.163.192 (talk) 06:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: The entire para about Vikramaditya's supposed inscription the Kaaba seems to be pesudohistorical junk. Is there a reliable source for this? All I can find is fringe theories on unreliable websites. utcursch | talk 15:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vikramaditya inscription the Kaaba 

message: Sandrokottos was name used by the Greeks to refer to Chandragupta Maurya over 700 years earlier.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.104.208 (talk) 10:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chandragupta Vikramaditya incorrectly attributed as Sandrokottos 

message: chandragupta 2 is a lie, there was no any chandragupta 2 in history. vikramaditya father was Gandharva-sena and he was agnivanshi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.243.197.9 (talk) 18:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  There was no chandragupta 2  
Talk:Masta ace

message: this is a copy from all music guide delete.222.152.164.213 09:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

message: what's with the redirect from 'Masta Ace' to 'Masta ace'? Shurely the former's more correct. W guice 18:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: caps
Talk:List of miscellaneous English Bible translations

message: * I really don't see the reason why the Anchor thing should be there at all in such a classification
* I actually don't see the point at all of this page, other than a place to collect together strange 'translation' things - surely there is a better way?!
Brusselsshrek 09:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add them into the modern translations page. that page doesn't care about the dialect, reason or media used. This separate page seems strange. Rmhermen 19:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this page does have some value in that it collects together the really esoteric projects (online only, not-a-Bible at all, etc.) Brusselsshrek 15:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance of this page

message: Indeed, I feel that even the recently deleted NSB deserves a spot here. Consider centering this discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible#Include incomplete versions.3F. --J. J. 20:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paraphrase versions

message: The The Brick Testament is in no way, shape, or form a translation of the Bible.  At best, it is illustrations of Biblical events.  You don't see other illustrations of the Bible (e.g. the works of Gustave Doré) listed as a translation.  It should be removed from the list. 68.113.47.82 19:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Brick Testament? 

message: There are already plural Wikipedia articles on English Bible translations.  What is this supposed to add?  Is there a reason it should not be deleted?Pete unseth (talk) 19:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this page exist? 
Talk:Ron Lyle

message: I just watched the fight twice all through and I don't think the current account is balanced. Ali is clearly in control throughout, even if he's letting Lyle score. Rd 11, the referee waited a long time before coming in, and Lyle was helpless taking punches to the head. I don't think there should be any implication the fight was stopped too early. Spicemix (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ali v Lyle 

message: I've toned down the claim that he was one of the best fighters never to become champion. Neither his record nor the videos of his fights quite justifies that. If that were the case, what about Jerry Quarry, a smaller man who beat him well?  Spicemix (talk) 10:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  top para 

message: On the Mozilla search page the side bar area show a picture captioned as "Ron Lyle" but is actually a
Getty image for Lyle Lovette.2602:306:BC4F:7810:103B:23EB:9FD8:F203 (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Picture 

message: The article states: "In 1965, while in prison, Lyle nearly died on the operating table after being stabbed by an inmate, but Dr. Townsee didn't give up on him..."  Who is Dr. Townsee?  And isn't "not giving up on" a patient during surgery pretty much one's minimal expectation of a surgeon?
HeraclitusEphesus (talk) 21:40, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unidentified surgeon
Talk:Pre-echo

message: This page needs review. To the uninitiated, it is a load of gobble-de-gook!
Seconded. Jackiespeel 16:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pre-echo is not always an artifact. It can also be added to soumd recording by some programs which can add normal echo.
As in, optionall special sound effects of echo and pre-echo. If I'm talking about something else, at least there would need to be a disambiguation page, to not confuse the two.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.7.94.114 (talk) 21:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio special effects 

message: This article is full of shit. Pre-echo has nothing to do with the Gibbs pheomenon. It is caused by quantization noise being spread over the transform window (Gibbs is about truncation of the spectrum, not quantisation). That's why it eventually goes away as the bit-rate increases. Jmvalin (talk) 13:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibbs 

message: The audio file provided in this article is helpful, but maybe it should be more explicit about what it's trying to demonstrate.  Is it showing mitigation of pre-echo (it is in the "Mitigation" section after all), or is just demonstrating pre-echo?
Monsterman222 (talk) 23:41, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That might not be a digital artifact at all. It's probably just the analog print-through of the magnetic tape from which the LP was mastered. 217.238.150.202 (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio file
File talk:Alligator-reef-lh.JPG

message: I chose  for this image because the Coast Guard site says that the photographer is unknown. The photo could have been taken by an employee of another agency. Many photos in the Coast Guard archives were taken before the Coast Guard became responsible for lighthouses. Some of the photos apparently were transfered from the Navy to the Coast Guard, while others can be presumed to have been inherited from the Lighthouse Service. Even photos taken since the Lighthouse Service was merged into the Coast Guard cannot automtically be assumed to have been taken by Coast Guard personnel. -- Dalbury(Talk) 22:18, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image attribution
File talk:Ameliaislandlh.JPG

message: I chose  for this image because the Coast Guard site says that the photographer is unknown. The photo could have been taken by an employee of another agency. Many photos in the Coast Guard archives were taken before the Coast Guard became responsible for lighthouses. Some of the photos apparantly were transfered from the Navy to the Coast Guard, while others can be presumed to have been inherited from the Lighthouse Service. Even photos taken since the Lighthouse Service was merged into the Coast Guard cannot automtically be assumed to have been taken by Coast Guard personnel. -- Donald Albury 03:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image attribution
Category talk:Florida elections

message: This was labeled "Politics". The problem in the US, is that everything is categorized that way and bleeds over into articles. Elections should be part of government perhaps. But in the US, it is simply one more nail in the coffin of WP:TOPIC when people chatter on about campaigns, imagining them to be "politics."
A notice above warns editors not to expect much traffic here. Will try elsewhere, as well. Student7 (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice on categorization
Talk:Crowland Abbey

message: One of the reasons why it might be 'confused with Croyland Abbey in the town of Wellingborough', is that both the Anglican Church and the Catholic Encyclopedia call it Croyland Abbey, rather than Crowland Abbey.
 William Avery 10:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused? 
Talk:Isometries in physics

message: This article contains the bulk of the material in a previous version of symmetry in physics. This latter article has been considerably reorganised. MP   (talk) 10:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New article created

message: I have requested help with the cleaning up of this article from someone at Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics, since I, for one, can't understand a word of it to even begin the cleaning process. Unschool (talk) 06:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten.  Please feel free to make more changes, or to make suggestions about which parts remain unclear.  And to add examples of scalar quantities, vector quantities, etc. since I didn't get around to it. --Reuben (talk) 02:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm missing here one important part of isometries. The part which involves discrete transformations and which is used to classify the crystal types and their possible properties (e.g. piezoelectricity). I'd like to append that to the article but I'm not an expert in this field of application. 78.128.193.169 (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seeking help
Talk:Hall of Prophecies

message: This description of the Hall Of Propechies seems more like a description of the battle that took place there. Should it be merged with the Department of Mysteries? --Stretch 10:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I notice on this article, it states that the one who might be the end of Voldemort could be Harry or Neville, but surely since the movie showed Harry taking the prophesy, surely this means the prophesy is about him. 
"Prophesy's can only be retrieved by the person who'm they are about"
Since Harry claimed it, it must be him that is destined to fight Voldemort. Although, i have to admit, it would be a plot twist if Neville got the death blow on voldemort just as Harry was about to be defeated. Which is a possible outcome in a future movie? Baaleos 15:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Potter or Neville Longbottom
Template talk:Education stages

message: I renamed this template because the contents reflected the title, not a broad coverage like the previous name implied.  This title now is available for something more comprehensive. Rfrisbietalk 03:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed template from "Education" to "Education stages" 

message: I'd like to suggest this layout be compressed from the two-dimensional style to a one-dimensional style.  This would be similar to the style used for the main portals page to organize subpages after main pages, e.g., Education (Schools, University).  An example of how the proposed layout might look follows. Rfrisbietalk 16:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nooooo.... one reason this template worked was the original table layout made it clear how the stages related to each other (followed each other, or "sub" stages). the new layout is not as good and that's even worse. :/ pfctdayelise (translate?) 17:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compressing layout 

message: Middle school be added to the list.  It is identified as a distinct stage between primary and secondary education in many countries.  Fishal 20:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle school

message: This template keeps cropping up in all the wrong places and is very confusing. It only seems to apply to US schools as far as I can make out but seems to have been used in articles which apply to schools worldwide. In many countries kindergarten is a type of pre-school, whereas in America kindergarten seems to be part of the school system. I think too it is mostly America which has middle schools. They do exist in some parts of the UK but most children go straight from primary to secondary school. Does this template actually serve any useful purpose? Should it be deleted or should it be reserved purely for US schools? There are so many different educational stages in different countries that I don't see how one template can posssibly cover all the possibilities. Dahliarose 22:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing template

message: Vocational education is not necessarily tertiary, although it can be in a trade school. However, it is often secondary in a technical high school. So, perhaps the "Vocational" Link could be shown as somehow overlapping secondary and tertiary (by the way, WP:Common name, "tertiary" is usually instead called "post-secondary" no matter how confusing that sounds), rather than strictly under tertiary. 
I'm tempted to suggest that "Preschool" should be "Preschool/Head Start" as synonyms, except I won't suggest it because I think that's only true in the USA. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 07:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocational under tertiary? 

message: If this template is to be fixed this is the place to start. In the meantime delete all? ClemRutter (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[ISCED 2011]] levels

message: For transgressing All-through school, K–12? PPEMES (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top row adding
Template talk:Infobox automobile

message: The documentation says that this is for the number of doors, but that is stated separately in the body style. In practice, the parameter seems to be used for unconventional door mounts, see Bricklin SV-1 DMC Delorean Mercedes-Benz 300 SL. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 23:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the parameter should remain just number of doors rather than type of doors. It is rare that door types such as scissors, gullwing, pocket, suicide doors, etc. are used. That information would be better in the body of the article rather than the infobox. Bahooka (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that's my fault. A few years ago I started doing that, but looking back i'm not very happy with the result and have been thinking of just undoing all those edits. If anyone sees a reason for those to stay feel free to reply, but otherwise i'm just gonna go ahead and remove them all. In reality there isn't much use for the doors parameter at all and it should just remain out of use. TKOIII (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The doors parameter information is still the same, i.e., number of doors rather than type of door. Number of doors is redundant because it is already included under body style, and I think many editors are using the parameter for door type (for example, McLaren Artura. At this point I don't have a preference of removing the doors parameter or changing the parameter to read type of door rather than number, but something needs to change so we're consistent and not redundant. Bahooka (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: doors parameter

message: The piping for each of the links below goes to a redirect, so please change them to go directly to the target.
*Transmission --> Transmission
*Layout --> Layout
*Platform --> Platform
 Colonies Chris (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: SWinxy (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Colonies Chris (talk) 08:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 6 April 2024 

message: Inquiring minds need to know. — Jon (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most sources exclude the side mirrors and only measure the body.  Stepho  talk  02:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good enough for me - cheers :) Jon (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width - do we include or exclude the side mirrors?
Talk:Ball badminton

message: The following statements were deleted from the article. Please provide the source for such claims.
raghavendran j ball badminton player representing the district of chennai is considered to be one of the best players in the world.his teammate praveen is another good player.they were both coached by mr hemant kumar,the head of the physical education department of AVM school one of the leading schools in the south of chennai.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangfroid (talk • contribs) 10:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced statement removed 

message: In copy-editing—and cleaning up—the article, I couldn't get my head around the following:
"In such a case (serving out of turn), the hand of the previous server shall be treated as down and the present server shall be asked to re-serve irrespective if the server wins or loses a point."
...and wanted to move it here instead of just deleting it.  Perhaps someone familiar with the sport's rules can rephrase and reinsert it.  Thanks! Wi2g 21:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faults
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia has too many rules

message: This is the proposed guideline split of WP:IAR which is getting old and moldy and is easy to misinterpret, as discussed on Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules. Ashibaka tock 11:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it wasn't split, but I like it, so here it is. Ashibaka tock 03:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just came upon this by accident and was about to propose we delete it as it's redundant. There's nothing here that isn't said at wikipedia:editing policy, wikipedia:ignore all rules or wikipedia:assume good faith. Let's have less guidelines, not more, please. Thanks! Stevage 20:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen Wikipedia:editing policy before, but it is a duplicate of that. The Five Pillars page linked to WP:IAR, which I felt was confusing. Please feel free to merge this into editing policy and change the Five Pillars link. Ashibaka tock 19:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Did both myself. Ashibaka tock 20:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Brittle star

message: <The ophiuroids diverged in the Early Ordovician,  [ca. 500 million years ago] > - 
diverged from ... ? is not apparant. Hilarleo 11:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range 

message: I want to add it, but I'm too drunk right now. KenFehling 03:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brittle Stars is band

message: Just wanted to apologize for the weird edit summary ("User:שבע-שלוש"), it was a result of copy & paste, the summary should have been a spelling correction, of course. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 19:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit summary 

message: In different paragraphs, it says 1500 and 1900. Which one is correct or more up to date? --Artman40 (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of species 

message: Strangely enough I see no full explanation about it's name. I don't know how to edit it, by anyways if I remember correctly my Greek classes ophis=serpent, oura=tail, eidos=form, ea=characterized by.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.33.243.34 (talk) 09:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: — Assignment last updated by SeaOtters123 (talk) 00:07, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Talk:Third party politics

message: The information provided on this page is stub at best.  I went through and formated it best I could, but there's really not enough quality information for the article to be of any use.  I'm not even sure what exactally the article was aiming to describe, with such fragmented and short statements.
Unless this page can be over-hauled with sources, explainations, and a sure format, I think it'd be best to merge or simply delete.  Merge would be my first inclination.
firehazard 11:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote merge. --Lukobe 21:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Either Merge or Delete
Talk:Fasci Siciliani

message: According to WP:it, the gabellotti are the land renters, not the land owners (that should be made clear). And it is not written gabelotti. In the hope it helps,--Agatino Catarella (talk) 14:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of precision + mispelling? 

message: What is meant with "taxes" in this article, exactly? What kind of taxes? --Agatino Catarella (talk) 01:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxes? 

message: The reference clarifies that durinf the congress in 1893, the Sicilian Socialist Party was founded: http://www.canalesicilia.it/palermo-sit-in-dei-socialisti-per-ricordare-i-120-anni-del-congresso-dei-fasci-siciliani-da-cui-scaturi-il-partito-socialista-siciliano/ . VerismoSiciliano (talk) 14:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sicilian Socialist Party 
Wikipedia talk:Allow anonymous users to start their own user pages

message: The only problem I could see with this would be the fact alot of people now have dynamic i.p.s or use services like AOL. This could cause the following:
* Users getting other peoples user pages.
* Wasting disk space with dynamic i.p.s
I personally see no problem with the current setup, I mean if someones going to be a longterm editor they should make a login and if they can't just request a user to make a blank one for them. I don't think its needed that much. - iGod 11:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above is all that needs to be said. Many, many IPs are dynamic, and there is no way to link them with specific individuals. User pages would never really represent the user of that IP. ~MDD4696 22:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Idea 

message: Anonymous users always had the ability to begin their own "user pages". This was not taken away because it was being abused, but by accident when they were prevented from starting new articles.
Please don't let the use of the term "user page" throw you. I do not expect anonymous users to build little home pages or do anything different to what they have always done.
With the current (new) policy: new anonymous users have the ability to edit their user page, but not to start it. Only other (signed-on) users have the ability to start an anonymous user's user page. This is inconsistant and stupid policy.
I'm not requesting for a new feature that never existed: I'm asking to fix what has been broken.
If you want to argue that IP addresses shouldn't have user pages, that is a different debate. Anonymous users already have user pages, they simply cannot be the first to edit them. They cannot edit them due to an oversight when enacting new policy.
Anonymous users already have user pages, and I have already given an example of a use for one. They are not new. Please reconsider this broken policy.
Why should an anonymous user's page work like this? It is stupid and inconsistant. If anonymous users are going to have user pages, they should be allowed to edit them at any time.
—Pengo 16:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "With the current (new) policy: new anonymous users have the ability to edit their user page, but not to start it. Only other (signed-on) users have the ability to start an anonymous user's user page. This is inconsistant and stupid policy."  Agreed, it's inconsistant and stupid, and the inconsistency and stupidity should be fixed by eliminating 'user' pages for what is roughly analogous to a phone booth, so they can't be created by signed-on users either. Fixing inconsistency by compounding stupidity is usually not the best plan. Aumakua 09:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing the point