Talk:Casimir III the Great

message: There is an ortography error in the sentence of the first line below the section Society under the reign of Casimir, he introduced were his attempt to put the overwhelming superiority of the nobility to an end.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcosoldfox (talk • contribs) 13:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are incorrect. Please see Wikipedia:Naming_convention#Polish_monarchs.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was see section below. Haukur 20:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: I have cleaned up the language somewhat in this article --Twenex 13:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was see section below. Haukur 20:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Language Cleanup

message: :Wite Support or Oppose and an optional one-sentence reason. Longer parts of opinions then below at discussion.
*Support. As nominator. Use English. Marrtel 17:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also prefer not to Latinize Slavic names at all cost. The Polish "Wladyslaw," for instance, has seen so many different Latinized/Anglicized forms that it's almost impossible to figure out what the "right" latinization is.  In such cases, we should stick with the Polish.  But this isn't true for Casimir/Kazimierz, which is pretty universal. john k 10:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poll

message: I've investigated the claims of sockpuppetry. Please see here. Mackensen (talk) 14:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are we throwing out 3 or 4 sockpuppet votes?  And are IPs allowed to vote? Appleseed (Talk) 19:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I wasn't sure if the fourth vote you were talking about was Logologist's (i.e. if a sockmaster is allowed to keep his single vote), but it appears that I'm the one accused of being the fourth sock. How disheartening.  Appleseed (Talk) 19:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don't discount my vote just yet.  I've contacted User:Jtdirl (the accuser) about this. Appleseed (Talk) 20:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The English form still is favoured by the majority of voters, whether eligible by your standards or any others presented. Charles 19:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for admiting your mistake here, for a moment I was afraid this was turning into some sort of a witch hunt.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sockpuppets 

message: What's the position of official Polish historiography abuot the Niemirza (sp?) and second Kazimierz illegitimate son? I guess we should some info about this to article too?
Szopen 08:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Legal"? СЛУЖБА (talk) 14:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal sons

message: Since Kazimierz the Great "left a country doubled in size," it might be interesting to see a map or maps illustrating his gains (and also, apparently, the loss of Silesia). Sca 17:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?

message: In line with almost all other Polish monarchs, this article should be renamed to Casimir III the Great. Any comments? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  06:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: It's late and so maybe I'm just tired. Why is the one section near the end given the title "tittle-tattles?" It's been that way for like a year so I'm guessing there's a reason, but I'm blanking on what reason. Can someone explain?--T. Anthony (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it. It contained no sources and it was equal to Wikipedia:Trivia. Surtsicna (talk) 16:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tittle-tattles?

message: "His three daughters by his fourth wife were very young and regarded as of dubious legitimacy because of their father's bigamy. Because all of the five children he fathered with his first and fourth wife were daughters, he would have no lawful male heir to his throne."
Well, everyone is young when they're born, surely this needs to be put in context. I'm assuming it's referring to when Casimir died, but the paragraph about his death comes after this one. So why was them being young relevant and when? 84.114.214.144 (talk) 22:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Something missing?

message: Failed for WPPOLAND due to insufficient density of inline citations and poor coverage. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Augustus II the Strong which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 14:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Why does the article say he was "facetiously called the Peasant's King"?  The examples cited seem to indicate this title was given unironically, and with full respect.  14:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Society under the Reigin of Casimir