lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ajegroup

message: *WHO WE ARE AJE is one of the largest multinational beverage companies, with presence in over 23 countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa, and with 13,000 direct and indirect employees. With 28 years of experience, AJE is the 10th largest soft drink company in sales volume and the 4th largest producer of carbonated soft drinks (source: Euromonitor, 2011). With a strong commitment to "democratizing consumption," AJE reaches out to new consumer groups and provides them with access to high quality products at fair prices.
*Competitiveness in Emerging Markets 3319717227 Datis Khajeheian, ‎Mike Friedrichsen, ‎Wilfried Mödinger - 2018 "In its home country, Peru, AJE Group acquired experience and knowledge regarding the soft drinks industry.] 
*OECD Investment Policy Reviews OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Peru 2008 9264053751 OECD - 2008 " Recent examples include AJE Group, a beverage producer company with subsidiaries in several South American "
*Navigating Commerce in Latin America: Options and Obstacles 1351396560 John E. Spillan, ‎Jase R. Ramsey - 2018  "AJE Group has become a leading multinational Beverage company in Peru."
*LatinFinance - Issues 189-193 - Page 58 2007 Ajegroup, a fast-growing Peru-based beverage multinational, got just this kind of plug in May when Honduras' leader cut the ribbon at its $7 million bottling plant in San Pedro Sula. Since then, the group, which is changing its name to AJE as as part of a branding strategy, has opened a $20 million bottler in Colombia and its first brewery at home in Peru. And AJE continues to surprise with its opportunistic expansion strategy....
:.........seems pretty clear that AJE (company) is the current name. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:COMMONNAME]]?
Talk:Development history of The Elder Scrolls series

message: The article is too heavy on text. The sections drag on and on, and makes it boring to read. Please consider dividing into smaller subsections. Also consider adding a few more screenshots or concept art and stuff. You may also consider adding a timeline summarizing the development history. --soum talk 07:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre GA Review comments

message: I noticed this because it was put up for reassessment and after reading it was thinking that it is an unnecessary content fork. The content here could be summarised in the The Elder Scrolls and each game could have the more detailed information. The problem with the current arrangement is that you end up having to update multiple articles each time instead of just one or two (hence the reason it was nominated for reassessment). It also results in a lot of information repeated. At the moment it comes across like a complex DAB page, especially the way it is set out. AIRcorn (talk) 04:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this. This is just a collection of repeated information that appears better organized in their respective articles: it's a content fork. — ΛΧΣ21 04:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree. It's just a bunch of information from several articles put into one.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay put the templates on. Will see what others say. AIRcorn (talk) 12:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

text: I disagree. That kind of information (developmental work between games, actions performed on a larger scale that ties in multiple games, and provide some overall unity of the development of the series) can be covered on the main The Elder Scrolls article. In my eyes, this article is just a copy-paste content fork (and incomplete, by the way, which is enough to make it lose its GA ribbon) from the rest of the articles with a bit of additional information here and there (some of it unsourced too). I don't see why should we keep this as anything but a redirect by now. — ΛΧΣ21 20:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm... I suppose the main the article could cover that. I'm still not entirely sure about this. I change my vote to neutral.--Futuretrillionaire (talk) 14:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd seriously like to work on this article, but I believe it will be better to improve the main ones :) — ΛΧΣ21 20:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Ringo (song)

message: Does this count as C&W rap? BTW, melody is similar to Big Bad John  Piandao  20:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rap? 

message: Don Bowman also recorded a parody, entitled The Other Ringo. The song is also a parody of Bowman, portraying himself as a closet "Beatle addict" who is found out by his producer and mentor, Chet Atkins. I am not sure of the date of the recording and will have to look for it. Mrklarinet (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Bowman 

message: You might want to link this to, and talk about, Lemon Jelly's use of it in '64 - '95Vince Calegon 13:06, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemon Jelly
Talk:Rosanna (song)

message: in the music video?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phd8511 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was it Patrick Swayze? 

message: 1. How on Earth is this song soft rock? It should be re-defined as funk rock.
2. Doesn’t the key change again to Bb major in the chorus?
--110.144.52.52 (talk) 09:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two things...
Talk:Roam

message: Have you noticed that this song has no vocals by Fred at all?
Communismeffect (talk) 07:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Without him, it doesn't sound like the B-52s; in fact, I initially thought the song was by The Go-Gos or The Bangles, and was surprised to learn it was actually the B-52s! Stonemason89 (talk) 15:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Fred. 

message: Could be something on the video (mostly the band members moving in front of stock travelogue footage, the esoteric symbols, the banana going through the bagel, ending with "ATOYOT", etc.)... AnonMoos (talk) 10:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video

message: This song is also played in an Ugly Betty episode, 'The Manhattan Project' I think. - Kevin  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.188.113.193 (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugly Betty
Talk:List of family seats of Welsh nobility

message: Whatever one's opinion of Prince Charles, he is surely classed as a member of the nobility/royalty, not as of the gentry (see that article's definition). I also wonder how appropriate it is to describe his recently acquired holiday home in Myddfai as his "family seat"! In my opinion he should not be on this list, as he is not a member of the gentry, not Welsh (despite his title), and furthermore his family seat is in England, not Wales. Fails on all counts. Enaidmawr 23:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles a member of the Welsh gentry?!
Template talk:Tennessee Titans

message: I boldly made some changes to the template today that may not end up being satisfactory to everyone who uses it.  The number one thing I tried to do was to make this a collapsible navbox, since the current version of it takes up a lot of space on the page with no way of hiding any of it.  I realize, of course, that this makes the box significantly wider than it used to be, but I'm still learning my way around creating and editing templates.  If someone with more knowledge knows how to "narrow" the box, then feel free to do so.  Personally, I think it looks better in "wide mode," if you will, if only because it's the same width as everything else on the article page.  Still, as long it's able to be hidden when it's not needed, I think it'd look fine either way.
I also added the Titans' conference championship from 1999, since it corresponds to the two championships from the old AFL. If the intent, however, is to only emphasize the "top" championship from each league, feel free to change it back. Esrever 22:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes to template 

message: I've boldly merged in Template:Titans Retired Numbers and Template:TitansCoach. They are being used on most of the same pages as the main navbox, so they're redundant. - BilCat (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant navboxes
Talk:Lifestyle drug

message: There is no talk page?! OK, I'm removing the NPOV dispute box, since it refers to reasons here that don't exist. Also, "headaches" are not considered a condition treated by "lifestyle drugs", so please stop re-adding it unless you can come up with a reputable published source that uses the term in that way. Kwertii 06:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tuvalu Police Force

message: I support the proposal to merge the Law enforcement in Tuvalu into the main Tuvalu page. I don't see that the quote of the section of the Constitution adds anything and should not be included in the main Tuvalu page.(MozzazzoM (talk) 02:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Asus Eee PC

message: Asus Eee PC 900AX:
* Size: 225 x 170 x 34 mm
* 1,127 kg
* Intel Atom N270 (1.6 GHz)
* Chipset Intel 945GSE Express, 1 GB DDR2 RAM
* VGA: Intel GMA 950
* Harddisk: 160 GB SATA + 500 GB Eee Storage
* Display 8.9“ TFT, 1024 × 600
* Konektivita: only 2 x USB 2.0 !!!, VGA port, audio konektory, 10/100 MB Ethernet, WiFi 802.11 b/g
* Další výbava: 0.3 Mpix webkamera , čtečka paměťových karet 3-v-1 (SD / SDHC / MMC), mono reproduktor s ozvučením HD Audio Codec
* Baterie: Li-Ion 4článková, výdrž až 4 hodiny
* Windows XP Home, 32 Bit
Source: https://projectgus.com/2010/10/ubuntu-on-asus-eeepc-900ax/   and  http://clanky.katalognotebooku.cz/1355-asus-eee-pc-900ax/    and   https://www.slashgear.com/asus-eee-pc-900ax-resurrects-8-9-inch-netbooks-3083770/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.77.211.93 (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing eee PC on table 

message: Intel Atom N270 (1.6 GHz)
    Harddisk: 2,5" 160 GB SATA
    1 or 2 GB RAM
    Display 8.9“ TFT, 1024 × 600
    Konektivita: 3 x USB 2.0, VGA port, audio konektory, 10/100 MB Ethernet, WiFi
    Webcam, Windows XP Home, 32 Bit
    Baterie: 7,4 V  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.166.142.217 (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Eee PC Eee 900HD on table
Talk:1988–89 Calgary Flames season

message: Did that victory actually happen in the Forum?  I've got at least four books beside me that list the Flames as the only visiting team to win.  Resolute 17:40, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It did, however for some reason it's usually overlooked, mainly because the victory was against the Maroons. Hmm, I'd suggest you bring the subject up here, perhaps someone there can clarify it for us. GoodDay 18:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've opened a discussion at the 'mentioned' WikiProject page. Now you've got me wondering. GoodDay 18:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some questions on the talk page at WP:HOCKEY. Resolute 18:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rangers vs. Maroons, 1928

message: Being a big NHL fan, I love this article.  I just have a hard time telling who win in your list/table of games.  Could you bold the name of the winning team?  That would make it a lot easier. Wrad 19:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's based off the background colour of the entry.  Green means Calgary won, red a loss, yellow a tie.  I'll look to adding an index to the head of that section. Resolute 19:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Wrad 19:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who won? 

message: The Edmonton Oilers had 84 pts, not 83. Frustratingly, the template doesn't have 'View-Disucss-History' links, so I can't make the correction. GoodDay (talk) 06:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smythe Division regular season stats error 
Talk:Radicular pain

message: I suggest radiculitis be moved to Radiculopathy, and Radicular pain be used throughout this article, because, according to Medterms.com, radiculopathy is synonymous with radiculitis. Any objections? Mikael Häggström 06:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move radiculitis to [[Radiculopathy]]

message: Radicular pain does not radiate along Dermatomes. See ﻿D. R. Murphy, E. L. Hurwitz, J. K. Gerrard, and R. Clary, “Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: Does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?,” Chiropractic & Osteopathy, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1-9, 2009. User:autonomics 17:39, 4 January 2011
:Would you like to correct the article, autonomics? I've filled in this "citation template" with the details of your source. Just copy and paste it after your correction, and it will appear as a correctly-formatted footnote when you click "save." It'll look like this:
*
:--Anthonyhcole (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Radiation along Dermatomes?
Talk:Pak Suet Sin

message: I'd like to suggest that this article be renamed to Bak Sheut Sin, and then have queries for "Bai Xuexian" redirect to "Bak Sheut Sin." It seems inconsistent to have "Ren Jianhui" redirect to "Yam Kim Fai" and not have a corresponding redirection and naming of an article for Bak Sheut Sin.
--Giacosilontana (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Benjwong (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to "Bak Sheut Sin"? 

message: This article listed her birthday as 1 April 1926. The Chinese version listed her birthday as 1928 04 23. Are these two articles referring to the same actress?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.228.157.190 (talk) 16:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different birthday
Talk:Par (golf scoring format)

message: Example partial scorecard for Par scoring format. kjFor convenience sake, handicap of 18 = one shot every hole.
Hole        	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	Out
Par         	4	3	5	5	4	3	4	4	4	36
Stroke Score	3	4	5	5	6	3	5	5	6	42
Par Score   	+	O	+	+	-	+	O	O	-	+2
Surely this will clear it up...Jasewase 07:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Seattle Seahawks

message: I think that the "Fail Mary" needs to be changed to "2012 Packers–Seahawks officiating controversy". Using the term fail in this context makes it seem as those Seattle cheated in some way or that their victory was tainted in some fashion, essentially placing blame on Settle for winning. Giving the neutral 2012 Packers–Seahawks officiating controversy title is just better because it makes an objective statement rather than an subjective statement.
: Disagree and have reverted to current consensus, as is used in the Packers' navbox, per WP:BRD.  If new consensus is established via Talk, this link can be retitled to the longer article name. UW Dawgs (talk) 03:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fail Mary" to "2012 Packers–Seahawks officiating controversy"
Talk:Combat command

message: The article as it currently stands makes the statement that late in the war, armored divisions used their CCR as a resting area for worn-out battalions. This was very much NOT the case with the 7th Armored Division. 7th Armored Division's Combat Command "R" began the war as an under-staffed reserve command. However, in January 1945, CCR became a fully-staffed and fully-equal combat command to CCA and CCB. This change was made based on the experience in prior months of combat. From that point on, CCR was just as active and integral a part of the combat of 7th Armored Division as CCA or CCB -- and was in no way a resting area for worn-out battalions. This was especially the case in the encirclement and reduction of the Ruhr Pocket in March and April 1945. User:7tharmddiv 11:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello and thanks for the comment. Your point is taken; however, the article uses the word "tended" to imply this was not necessarily a firm practice. Granted the 7th AD did not follow this practice; do you believe this was generally the case for all or most of the late-war armored divisions? I welcome further examples and will gladly edit the article if there are more examples. For the moment, I will insert a footnote mentioning the 7th's operational use of all three commands. Cheers, W. B. Wilson 15:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I only have information for 7th Armored Division in this regard. 7tharmddiv 23:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in late-war Combat Command usage 

message: In the "abbreviations" section is states that Combat Command C was the "older" naming convention, yet in the "History" section it states that Combat Command Reserve came first and Combat Command C was implemented in 1954.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.38.80.215 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in the text? 

message: The spearhead part uses CCR on both sides of the equation, that seems off. But i am not sure that the second mention (units outpaced by CCR) should really be CCB, so maybe somebody with detailed knowledge of the situation should check it?
--84.118.56.218 (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote 2
Talk:Harvard World Model United Nations

message: This page currently redirects to the Harvard International Relations Council page, but it is unaffiliated with the HIRC; it is in fact a separate student organization that was founded by students unaffiliated with the HIRC. As such, I am removing the redirect and replacing this article with a stub. I know that the consensus before was to combine these articles together, but the new combination into the Harvard IRC page excludes this conference. I do claim that it is notable, since there are third party media articles about it. Optimusnauta (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

message: The article has .org. Is http://theworldmun.com/ the same thing? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Website

message: Hi!
The language used in this article is terrible.
'a competitive bidding process'?
'unique forum'?
'ideal size'?
Rewording needed.
Also, there seems to permanently be controversy around the logistics of WorldMUN whenever attendance occurs - perhaps a 'controversy' section should be added?
Hentheden (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of NPOV 

message: It seems that this Article's conference activities plagiarized (WP:PLAGIARISM), word per word, several descriptions from the 2014 WorldMUN brochure. This is not acceptable on Wikipedia, and I have therefore eliminated the text. Access to this particular brochure potentially shows that the editor may have a conflict of interest WP:COI, so please review the guidelines if you belong to the WorldMUN team, as you must disclose Conflicts of Interest. Pilaz (talk) 11:03, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: The 2014 best delegation award was given to the Peruvian Universities Debate Team per source.https://twitter.com/WorldModelUN/status/447058093923643392 I find it dubious that Universidad Simón Bolívar won the same award. I can only find vague unofficial claims by a couple venezuelans on Twitter, and no evidence for it. I'm therefore flagging that claim as dubious. Pilaz (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 Best large delegation 

message: You're invited to contribute to a discussion at Model United Nations to determine whether uppercase "Model" should be kept or lowercase "model" should be adopted. Thank you, Pilaz (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of capitalization of MUN at [[Talk:Model United Nations]]
Category talk:ZX Spectrum-only games

message: Due to the lack of concensus in the discussion here: , and several users feeling that all-inclusion would be preferable, and indeed in line with WP:SUBCAT ("When an article is put into a subcategory based on an attribute that is not the first thing most people would think of to categorise it, it should be left in the parent category as well"), I will begin including all games in this sub-category in the parent category too, and also add any relevant titles I notice along the way to this sub-cat also. If anyone has any reason for objecting, please note here or on my talk page. Thanks, Miremare 18:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I object.  Not because I don't agree with the outcome, i.e. that a game is listed in both the parent- and sub-cat, but because adding this information is redundant and as such will become notorious difficult to maintain over time - perhaps not with this particular partent- and sub-cat, but in general.  This should be a property of the subcategory and not each indivdual article.  --Frodet 20:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: proposed merge with parent category
Category talk:Nintendo DS-only games

message: Due to the lack of concensus in the discussion here: , and several users feeling that all-inclusion would be preferable, and indeed in line with WP:SUBCAT ("When an article is put into a subcategory based on an attribute that is not the first thing most people would think of to categorise it, it should be left in the parent category as well"), I will begin including all games in this sub-category in the parent category too, and also add any relevant titles I notice along the way to this sub-cat also. If anyone has any reason for objecting, please note here or on my talk page. Thanks, Miremare 18:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: proposed merge with parent category
Category talk:PlayStation 2-only games

message: Due to the lack of concensus in the discussion here: , and several users feeling that all-inclusion would be preferable, and indeed in line with WP:SUBCAT ("When an article is put into a subcategory based on an attribute that is not the first thing most people would think of to categorise it, it should be left in the parent category as well"), I will begin including all games in this sub-category in the parent category too, and also add any relevant titles I notice along the way to this sub-cat also. If anyone has any reason for objecting, please note here or on my talk page. Thanks, Miremare 18:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: proposed merge with parent category
Talk:Lynton and Lynmouth Cliff Railway

message: Might it be necessary if some information is added on how fast the train travels, and how long it takes for the train to go uphill and downhill? BrayLockBoy (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be useful, if that information is available.I don't know where it could found though. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 18:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data 

message: There is a discussion about the 3ft 8in? track gauge here. -DePiep (talk) 10:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  3ft 8in track gauge? 

message: The previous version said that there was a passing "loop" half way up.  The thing that happens half way up is clearly not a passing "loop" which is a concept applicable to single track railways (and the link that was made to the Wikipedia page confirms this).  I have tried passing "bay" but I'm not sure that's exactly right either.  Does anyone know the correct technical term?--Johnstoo (talk) 17:12, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passing bay or loop
Talk:Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

message: hi! the page in Portuguese show better pictures IMO (gallery). maybe they might be used here too. what do you think?Tetraktys-English 08:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kasaragod Tulu

message: I am glad to put up this page.
ARUNKUMAR P.R 08:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Page

message: What/who is this Boloji and how does it satisfy WP:RS? Who is the author of these articles and what is his expertise in the subject matter? Unless you satisfy WP:RS soon, I'll delete all those references and place appropriate tags to the article. Gnanapiti 05:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources

message: This site is only addressing the page.The author,Hebbar has worked on Tulu,Its script for a long time.This site also finds its place in some of Tuluva article in Wikipedia.
Also Wikipedia is not a Place for the act of Kannada Raksha Vedika.Thanks.
ARUNKUMAR P.R 07:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boloji
Talk:Chisholm Catholic College, Perth

message: Needs some references. You have an infobox. Some pics would be good. Lots of advice at wikiproject schools. This is a good "start"...a B? Victuallers 15:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess