lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anchorite

message: Out of curiosity, anyone know what they did with the anchoress's body when they died? Did they tear down the wall or something? --NeuronExMachina 18:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I've read most were buried in their parish cemetery. I would also hazard a guess that some were buried in family plots. I've also seen a reference to an Anchoress being interred under her cell (Anorra of St. Mary's Iffley, maybe?) Cheers Oons 20:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial 

message: The article's title is Anchorite, but the article itself refers almost exclusively to anchoresses.  Should it perhaps be noted somewhere that the majority of people practicing this particular devotion were female?  Were the majority of them female? I don't really know.  Esrever 15:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchorite vs Anchoress 

message: Catherine of Siena led a "consecrated life," but did not remain confined to a cell; she traveled extensively.  If the definition of an anchoress requires confinement, she does not fit the bill.  This needs to be fixed, but I'm not sure if the definition is wrong, or if Catherine of Sienna should be removed as an example. MamaGeek (talk/contrib) 14:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catherine of Siena
Talk:Roseland, California

message: Today, User:Clab6 attempted to file an AFD (or possibly two) on this article. Given that the AFD was malformed, and that no reason was given for it, and that directly after that User:Clab6 added the  tag to the article (which doesn't require an AFD), I've removed the notice. I don't have a strong opinion as to whether or not it should be merged—anyone else? Dori (Talk • Contribs) 05:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Clab6 undid my revision, but the AFD is still malformed. I added a note on his talk page explaining why I re-reverted it, why the AFD wasn't actually ever filed, and requesting that he please continue the discussion over here. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 00:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion, merger, or ? 

message: I don't think Roseland should be merged into Santa Rosa.  Santa Rosa is incorporated, and last I checked, Roseland was outside the city limits.  The U.S. Census Bureau treats Roseland as a separate place, so I think Wikipedia should also.  - Stepheng3 (talk) 06:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal
Talk:Jayanagar, Bangalore

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
The biggest Risk in life is; not taking one. (talk) 07:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Mephistophelian (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/oldworld-charm-sadly-eroded/article4656604.ece. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Sujata Bhatt

message: Sujata bhatt is a poet and i havn't got time to write any more (I'll be back to finish the article in a bit)
This article is ridiculous 86.16.139.140 (talk) 19:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So. Who knew the start of Bhatt?? 2A00:23C7:5701:3401:5C06:DBE4:3F33:9BA5 (talk) 14:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No idea
Talk:Gridiron Gang

message: what rot ... hw many actors....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by I.aditya (talk • contribs) 11:02, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2007

message: I copyedited the page and removed the tag, as I fixed the grammar errors.  Tanthanyes 4/22/08  —Preceding comment was added at 01:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Copyedit Tag

message: What things are not "historically accurate" that are in the movie? Can this wiki be something a little more than it's a movie about a bunch of x gangmembers playing football followed by a cliff note summary of the movie?  Wiki nazi's where are you? 76.123.100.182 (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2009

message: The following was posted to a New Contributors help page—I'm copying it here so people familar with the article can address it.--SPhilbrickT 00:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible errors?

message: Can some-one compare the story and the reality?Kdammers (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: loosely based
Talk:The Last Kiss (2006 film)

message: The Plot synopsis seems incomplete to me without any mention of Jenna's mother cheating on her father and the surrounding conflict and story with that. It is important in respect as to how Jenna deals with being cheated on.
HotOne121 (talk) 04:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Why was the trivia section deleted? The informations were interesting and supported the understanding of the movie.
Markus-Oswald 06:00, 26 January 2009 (UTC+1h)
: Because the fundamentalists of the "delete all trivia"-party are wreaking havoc on wikipedia! This is so stupid!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.133.218.78 (talk) 01:45, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Vanessa Fisk

message: The name Vanessa Marianna Fisk appeared on her tombstone in Daredevil 93 (2007) years before the Netflix show. 80.189.20.20 (talk) 12:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marianna
Template talk:Brutus family tree

message: re: Servilia tree. 
* (M.L. Clarke, The Noblest Roman, 1981 Thames & Hudson) Porcia Catonis, daughter of M. Porcius Cato (95-46BC) was married to M. Calpurnius Bibulus (co-Cos with Caesar, d 48BC) before M. Junius Brutus (85?-42BC) who also was previously married to Claudia. Also, Junia Prima is shown as married to Lepidus, Junia Tertia to Longinus, the other child is just listed as dead.
* (E.S. Gruen the Last Generation of the Roman Republic) says that Lucullus was married to Cato's half-sister Servilia; what you have is probably fine since Lucullus died in 56 BC). Hortensius daughter was the wife of Cato's stepbrother Q. Servilius Caepio who adopted Brutus
* I also have Friedrich Münzer which traces this stemma back to Cn Servilius Caepio, Cos169.
* I can not find anything about how they are related to the branch P. Servilius Geminus Cos 252, 248 and/or C. Servilius Geminus, praetor before 218 and his descendants. Is the idea to show multiple disconnected stemma? I think it would be good to do so, because their descent (no doubt claimed, even if dubiously) from Servellius Ahala is important.
Curtius 17:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sonic Adventure 2 Battle

message: 1. This article should be merged into the Sonic Adventure 2 article.
2. Or, a colon should be added into the title of this article.
Someone do something about this, please.
Paul Haymon 19:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that this article has apparently already been sufficiently merged into the SA2 article.  Why is this article still here?  It should be deleted. Paul Haymon 19:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged it several times, but someone keeps on reverting it, and apparently, my edits on merging it don't appear in the history. UnDeRsCoRe 21:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I sent a message to Alphachimp about this. Paul Haymon 01:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be resolved now. Paul Haymon 01:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Things
Talk:U.S. Open (go)

message: This should not be merged with Go (board game) because it is a seperate Go competition. CanbekEsen 19:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be reasonable to merge it into U.S. Go Congress, however --IanOsgood 01:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think merging the US Open page into the Congress page is reasonable. I'm going to update the Congress page with the information in the Open page, allowing someone to delete this page if they want. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Horacelamb (talk • contribs) 06:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with the U.S. Go Congress page
Talk:False brinelling

message: The wording in this article needs cleaning up, it currently reads in a very simplistic and technically incorrect manner.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.231.194.93 (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! We all look forward to your contribution. -AndrewDressel (talk) 12:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Snoop (software)

message: Why is snoop listed as one of the major technologies offered by Solaris? It's only a command line packet sniffer. An equivalent program exists on every Unix (and even other) operating system. Am I missing something?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.127.246 (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  major technology?
Talk:Leamaneh Castle

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is quite close to this http://www.clare.ie/attractions/view/historic_buildings-14/leamaneh_castle-951.html. But maybe they copied it from WP.... As a source it seems to be somewhat reliable (seems to be a Tourism offshoot of the Clare County Council). But I will rework this page with another source I have found.Drow69 (talk) 17:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That website is more or less an advertisement website, so as source unreliable at best. The Banner talk 18:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation
Talk:Snaffle bit

message: In order to help make this article more properly encyclopedic, shouldn't we add the etymology of the word "snaffle? 76.190.213.189 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: I took the liberty to remove the Fitting section. It was entirely unsourced (and had been tagged as such for over two years now), and was written as a how-to manual. Remember, Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. Having information on how they are fit to horses is not a bad thing, but it shouldn't be written as a how-to manual and must be sourced. nf utvol (talk) 22:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fitting Section Removed
Talk:Justina of Padua

message: Somebody fix the errors in the article please! St Justina couldn’t have died in 304 at the persecution of Nero who died in 68. She obviously couldnt have lived in the first century either with such a year of death. Probably two St. Justinas mixed up here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.159.22 (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone fix this please
Talk:Tennessee's 6th congressional district

message: This page needs some major edits after the 2022 redistricting cycle.
Not every Democrat failed to cross the 30% mark in the 6th district since Bart Gordon's retirement. In 2010, Brett Carter eked out 30.4% of the vote, although that would still round to 30% if you rounded it to the nearest full percentage point. Also, Randal Cooper got 33.7% of the vote in 2022 and carried one county in the district.
Randal Cooper is an odd matter in and of itself, though. Randal Cooper got less than 30% of the vote in every county except one: Davidson. He got over 70% of the vote in the part of Davidson County that was gerrymandered into the 6th district, which includes the Antioch, East Nashville, Madison and Old Hickory neighborhoods. Also, most of Lebanon and Mount Juliet were redrawn into Tennessee's 5th district, with only the easternmost parts of Lebanon remaining in the 6th along with outlying eastern and northern areas of Wilson County (including Watertown).
With what wording are we supposed to address this? Mount Juliet, and potentially Lebanon, are no longer among the district's largest cities, and Nashville may now be among them if you decide to count partially included areas. Also, while Cooper did get over 30% of the vote and carry one county in the district, that was only a portion of a county gerrymandered into the district; Cooper still failed to cross the 30% mark not only in the rest of the district but in every other individual county too (so every whole county, as well as the portion of Wilson remaining in the 6th). Please seriously consider major changes to or even a total revamp of parts of this article, given the sudden change in the district's geography and political climate.
--EvergreenLAM EvergreenLAM (talk) 07:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redistricting/Cooper
Talk:Campus Kitchen

message: Table wasn't closing properly, reverted back to old form. 
I'm still in the process of adding information that will make it useful to Wikipedia. There was a mention of the Campus Kitchen at Gonzaga College High School on the GCHS page, but no link. This provides information on the project.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ckgchs (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 October 2006  (UTC)
**This appears to be a legitimate charitable endeavour rather than a profit-making company. I added some references to demonstrate notability. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Montenegro

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lake Skadar#Requested move 5 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Lake Skadar#Requested move 5 January 2024]] 

message: Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries. 
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and climb the leaderboard. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Montenegro is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest and articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points, so I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content! 
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today! 
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 07:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:DCWC|Developing Countries WikiContest]]
Talk:Memory (disambiguation)

message: :(Moved from personal e-mail.)
Hi,
please explain what is the point of the revert in the diasambigation page for memory.
You are probably aware of my views  as stated on the talk page (Personal vs impersonal) for Memory. The author of the article reverted the general definition I proposed and insists that only his cognitive- neuroscientific pov is right. I proposed either to have the entry qualified e.g. Memory (psychology) or to direct the query straight to the disambiguation page. Introducing the words 'in psychology' 
at the beginning is a palliative I agree with. But I do not see the point to omit them in the disambiguation page where one might hope to see a general definition encompassing hysteresis,computers, collective memory etc.( well I proposed one, didn't I).
What's more the first line 'In psychology the ability of an organism.
.'does not sound very good as few organisms have a psyche.
regards. al 
:I actually explained my reasons in the edit summary, and they had nothing to do with any debate going on over Memory, as that's not an article I watch. I therefore don't understand most of your comment; you're referring to things that weren't relevant to my reversion of your edit. As I explained in my edit summary, the reason I reverted your edit is quite simply that WP:MOSDAB forbids linking to Psychology in this sort of situation. Ruakh 19:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert
Talk:A Date with Your Family

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 22:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: I especially wonder where the Hugh Beaumont credit comes from. Rickprelinger (talk) 01:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: No citations?
Talk:Angels Revenge

message: This movie was released theatrically as Angels Brigade, so why is it listed under Angels Revenge (a video release title)? I know it's probably better known under that title because of the MST version using that title, but shouldn't films be listed under their original one? 2604:6000:6D41:D700:C13F:3257:B01D:A4C3 (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title?
Talk:Kenneth Stevenson

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Circuit de Charade

message: I have renamed this article from Charade Circuit to Circuit de Charade. I have done this because this is the circuits official name as can be seen on [www.charade.fr/ the official circuit website]. Although this is in French, I have found few reliable English sources on this circuit, resulting in referral to WP:TRANSLITERATE, which suggests the use of the foreign-language name. In addition, this circuit name also brings this articles naming scheme into line with other French-language circuits, such as the Circuit de Pau and the Circuit de Monaco. -- FactualCollector7d1 (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Renaming from Charade Circuit to Circuit de Charade
Talk:1995 Pacific Grand Prix

message: For reference. Last "clean" version before article hits the Main Page as TFA. D.M.N. (talk) 21:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three-hours time... 

message: Just before Main Page day, I have added a spoken version of this article; see the link above.  Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! :) D.M.N. (talk) 06:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken version added 

message: I know there has been discussion recently about changing flags for specific Grands Prix over at WP:F1, specifically the likes of the Las Vegas Grand Prix and such.  But I've always wondered about the Pacific Grand Prix.  I know that the European Union flag has been used in recent years in association with the European Grand Prix, but was the Pacific Community flag actual used for the Pacific Grand Prix?  It seems as though it's a bit of a "guess" to use this flag to represent the Pacific, even though I haven't necessarily seen anything that ties the two together.  Should this specific flag be here or not? The359 (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be the Japanese flag I think. The European GP is a special case in that the flag has an official status of sorts. Readro (talk) 21:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd also point out that Japan is not even a member of the Pacific Community, although we do have cases of races outside their designated country.  I think I'd agree on either the Japanese flag, or at least for this article, no flag. The359 (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just made the change, before even reading this discussion.  That flag has be inappropriately used to represent "Pacific" on both motorsport and tennis articles, and I have been fixing that.  — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 20:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pacific Flag
Talk:2006 American League Championship Series

message: ===Detroit Tigers===
Pitchers (11)
*
*
*
*
* 
*
*
*
*
*
*		
Catchers (2)
*
*
Infielders (7)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*		
Outfielders (4)
*
*
*
*
Designated hitter (1)
*
===Oakland Athletics===
Pitchers (11)
*
*
*
*
* 
*
*
*
*
*
*	 	
Catchers (2)
*
*
Infielders (6)
*
*
*
*  
*
*	 	
Outfielders (5)
*
*
*
*
*
Designated hitter (1)
*
{{subst:image source|Image:2006 ALCS Logo.png)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ALCS 25-man team playoff rosters

message: Pitchers (11)
*
*
*
*
* 
*
*
*
*
*
*	 	
Catchers (2)
*
*
Infielders (6)
*
*
*
*  
*
*	 	
Outfielders (5)
*
*
*
*
*
Designated hitter (1)
*
{{subst:image source|Image:2006 ALCS Logo.png)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oakland Athletics
Talk:Ken Mizorogi

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, Instead of Proposed deletion for this article, since it has 102 page views in the past 30 days, a Redirect would be more appropriate. Redirect to the television series Kamen Rider 555 that Ken Mizorogi was in cast. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdraw deletion, redirect article
Talk:Shuvalov

message: The article says; "Thekla Walentinowicz, a local landowner's daughter, remarried Count Shuvalov". Do anyone know which on of the Shuvalov's she married? Ivan? ChickenFalls 19:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to follow a link provided at the end of the article. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:American crime fiction writers

message: These two categories--"American crime fiction writers" and "American mystery writers"--define fields that are virtually synonymous in general parlance. There is already considerable overlap, with more than 50% of those listed as "American crime fiction writers" (29 out of 53) also listed as "American mystery writers." In almost every case beyond those currently overlapping, it is hard to see why a given writer qualifying for one list wouldn't qualify for the other. Merging the categories under either title would go far toward creating a comprehensive, nonconfusing list of American writers in the field. As for which title would be used for a merged category, while at present the "American mystery writers" list is much larger than the "American crime fiction writers" list, the primary article discussing the field is crime fiction, which is also the broader term. Please see official discussion.
Best, Dan—DCGeist 19:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case for merger
Talk:Mnguni

message: His mother is more notable than he: she had the foresight to name him Father of a Nation instead of Poor Slob who Wandered far from Home and got Ignominiously Slaughtered.
My point is that this is not a bio, nor even a history article in which an identifiable person plays a major role. Even if it gets the timing and geography right (which is quite plausible) it is nevertheless simply the elevation of an origin legend into fake history.
It should be rewritten as an account of the existence and influence of a presumably important origin legend. In the meantime, i'm changing the tags away from biograpy ones.--Jerzy•t 19:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How sure of what you are talking about ? , I think as a founder of the Nguni people (including myself) it is very important that we increase this article whether there are references or oral history Bobbyshabangu talk 19:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled