lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Warrant (law)

message: "The Fourth Amendment...prohibits search or arrest without a warrant, unless there is probable cause."
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that sentence is incorrect. From what I understand, it's true that in some (but not all) cases, a search may be conducted without a warrant if probable cause exists (if an automobile is pulled over, a police officer may search the vehicle without a search warrant if the officer has probable cause: Carroll v. U.S., 267 U.S. 132 [1925]), but other cases would require a police officer to obtain a warrant, even if the officer had probable cause (a police officer needs a warrant to search a private residence, even if the officer has probable cause: Agnello v. U.S., 269 U.S. 20 [1925]). My understanding is that the 4th Amendment forbids searches conducted without a warrant, except in a few limited, well-defined exceptions (such as a search of a person following the person's arrest [United States v. Robinson, 414 U. S. 218 (1973)], or where a person consents to the police conducting a search [Zap v. U.S., 328 U.S. 624 (1946)], etc.) --- 66.171.140.181 00:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Hitting or striking a disabled person is a felony how does that work and what does it mean to cop Jeremy in family (talk) 04:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disable people  

message: What should you do when the jury trial is based on a lie? 2603:6010:1044:929B:29F5:5B72:92E4:DA4 (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  False witness
Talk:Motorized Reserves of the Citizens' Militia

message: Hey! During the Martial Law in 1981 the ZOMO was not fighting with "peaceful protesters"...If this article is trying to be accurate why didn't anybody mention how where the 'protesters' in 'Wujek' armed....? Somehow i don't belive that spiked metal poles or improvised machines that where throwing very heavy screws is what typical protesters have. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.16.167.2 (talk • contribs).
:Throwing "very heavy screws" against tanks and armoured personnel carriers? Armed means firearms (and they were shot without warning with automatic rifles, 9 killed and 21 wounded, including people fleeing or already wounded once). --HanzoHattori 19:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Armed means with weapons, this includes even non-weapons used as weapons for the occasion.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Loop theorem

message: Klaus Johannson also has a tower-free proof of the loop theorem, which predates Rubinstein and Lackenby, I believe.  See "On the loop- and sphere-theorem" in Low-dimensional Topology, the proceedings of the 1992 Knoxville conference. best, Sam nead 06:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expect that the Johannson proof also uses a hierarchy and is essentially Waldhausen's proof, just like the other ones you mentioned, although of course, the implementations can be quite different and elegant.  Right now, I'm going through the Waldhausen stuff.  I'll take a look at the Johannson stuff if I get a chance.  --C S (Talk) 06:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Johannson uses the Haken heirarchy.  That isn't my point.  My point is that [AR] was published in 2004, [L] was written in 1999, and [J] was published in 1992.  I freely admit that [J] is the only tower-free proof I am familiar with.  This is the first time I've heard of [W] -- is it available on-line? Sam nead 18:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you've taken a look and can say a few words about it, please do so in the article!  I'm not going to add a reference to something I've not taken a look at.  Waldhausen's paper on the world problem was in the Annals, available through JSTOR.  --C S (Talk) 20:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Just took a look at the review on MathSciNet of the Johannson paper.  The reviewer says the loop theorem is proved "in full generality".  It's difficult for me to believe that this method of proof could really work for say, the second version in the article (due to Stallings).  So what does "full generality" mean here?  --C S (Talk) 21:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll look at Waldhausen's Annals paper.  I should have done that already.  "Full generality" certainly does not mean "full generality" -- there is no mention of groups, normal or otherwise, in Johannson's paper.  However, he does conclude that there is a non-singular disk with boundary lying in a regular neighborhood of the boundary of the given singular disk.  Perhaps that is it?  best, Sam nead 03:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The statement of the theorem would be clearer if at least some reference were made to basepoints for the various fundamental groups.50.205.142.50 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basepoint?
Talk:David Eccles (businessman)

message: Numerous uncited and unsupported assertions. Several biased assertions. For example, "Eccles was a hard worker";  "One of his hallmarks was integrity and self-reliance"; "His companies prospered on his no debt plan, and view of achieving success rather than money"; etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:3480:B02:218D:A2E4:3298:51AF (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV-check
Talk:Small, Maynard & Company

message: Yours truly,--Ludvikus 13:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Се́ргиев Поса́д
(The Protocols and World Revolution)
(Small, Maynard & Company 1920 ed. of the 1917 Russian)
v.
Сергвй Нилүсъ
(cannot make accent over the “B”)
:I require assistance regarding Russian history and Language about "THE TOWN OF SERGIEV."
::What was this place in 1917 called, etc.
:::And is "Town" a correct translation from the Russian of the time?
:Ludvikus 16:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Russian]] Place

message: Can someone place the appropriate category regarding this fact?
--Ludvikus 13:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct House 

message: Can some contribute at least the names of some of the famous authors who had their published by this reputable Boston house?
:Ludvikus 13:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: 1897-1927: https://www.worldcat.org/search?q=kw%3ASmall%2C+Maynard+%26+Company&fq=yr%3A1897..1927+%3E&qt=advanced&dblist=638  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.126.25 (talk) 20:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1,094 Hits on WorldCat during its existence
Talk:Malyutham

message: Helo,
Sorry, with all due respect, I forgot to quote the article and state that it came from the listed site. However, I did list the site. So, I will put the quote or the source right after the article as denoted by a numeral in brackets. Ex: [1].
Regards.
Wiki Raja 00:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Error 

message: Hi Dayaanjali,
I would like to state that by merging Malyutham to Mallyuddha it is totally leaving out the Tamil info on the art. I understand that Tamil Nadu, Gujurat, and other states are a part of the same country, India. However, because they may be from the same country does not mean that the culture of Tamil Nadu would be the same of that of Punjab. Furthermore, both the arts of Malyutham and Mallyuddha (if they are considered the same) were practiced before the formation of India by the British. Another thing I would like to explain is that both of these wrestling techniques share similarities and possibly similarities in the name. However, the practice and history of each are different. An example of this in Southeast Asia would be the art of Silat. In Java there is Pentjak Silat, while in Malaysia there is Bersilat. Both share similarities in name and practice, however, the history of each is different. Here is another example, the Both Muay Thai in Thailand, and Leth Wei in Burma are kick boxing and are pretty much the same, but are of different histories and cultures. Lastly, please discuss on talk page first before redirecting. Regards. Wiki Raja 05:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Malyutham and Mallyuddha

message: Evidence that this is a recognizable style, as opposed to simply a historical Tamil word for "wrestling"? --dab (𒁳) 11:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:David M. Gonzales

message: Where does all that detailed information at "Early Years" section comes from? There's no source for that. --damiens.rf 17:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Years? 

message: The second reference is such an weird url
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=QALA&p_theme=ladn&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=500&s_dispstring=allfields(Gonzales%20)%20AND%20date(05/26/2007%20to%2005/26/2007)&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=05/26/2007%20to%2005/26/2007)&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=(
Did it ever worked? --damiens.rf 17:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird url 

message: Where does the information in the World War II section actually come from? It uses "The Rakkasans: the combat history of the 187th Airborne Infantry" as a source, but Google Books says this book has no mention to "gonzalez" or "vila verde" . Also, "thunderbolt" is used only once in the book and in a completely unrelated context. --damiens.rf 18:44, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No word on that? I will be cleaning up the section shortly. --damiens.rf 18:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Just did it. --damiens.rf 16:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War II section
Talk:Shahdara district

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Hi, I edited this article a while back and I like additions. However, I think we have to be careful to keep the tone encyclopaedic and use good footnotes so it can be a really good and useful article. It's nice to mention individual people and their families and how people felt about them but that sort of thing would be better on a blog/website than in an encyclopaedia. I also get concerned about people's privacy and safety when their address is mentioned but they may not be a "public figure". Kind regards to all, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 04:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: encyclopaedic material
Talk:Tututepec

message: Anyone have a photo for Tututepec - maybe because you've been there?  If you could, could you upload it, please?  SM Sophiahounslow (talk) 14:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo needed 
Talk:Kima, Keisha, and Pam

message: minor edits are fine but some of the edits removed detailed and relevant information like producers and edits of the main tracklisting were unnecessary and not as aesthetically pleasing. If making an edit please give reasons. Thank you for the minor fixes though :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeahartley (talk • contribs) 
:I fixed it up because 1] it looked like crap 2] it had absolutely horrid formatting (when has Infobox Album ever appeared between the opening paragraph and the track list?) and 3] the new version is more encyclopedic and more similar to other album articles. 
:I took out the producers because we don't need all of them in the infobox, and I was gonna make a personnel section for it. 
:And there's no need for a table in a track list unless it's actually that complex (see 4:21...The Day After). --Machchunk | make some noise at me 07:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I could've. It's also pretty late though, and after doing all of that and seeing that that response, I just got too defensive. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 07:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Could you reword that last part? --Machchunk | make some noise at me 07:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I know it's there's for a reason, but the Infobox is the bare minimum for information. After all, It's not like the Infobox needs to have every speck of information; that's what the rest of the article is for. But I get what you're saying, and I respect that. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 18:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

message: What ever happened to these gurls  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.199.152.210 (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pam
Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar

message: Per  is "Alternative medicine" a better heading than "Alternative and pseudo‑medicine"? According to WP , they are pretty much the same thing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, as all the pages seems to protray all medicine possiblitly other than main stream as pseudo no need to put it here Shrikanthv (talk) 11:51, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, changed. Telsho (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template heading 

message: I noticed that the COVID-19 link in the Conspiracies section goes to Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic but the wording shows as "COVID-19 pandemic" - that could be misread as implying that the pandemic itself is the conspiracy, rather than that there are conspiracy theories about the pandemic. Everything else in that section is wording more clearly eg anti-vaccine, HIV/AIDS denialism
What about a change of wording to 
* COVID-19 denialism
* COVID-19 origins conspiracies
* COVID-19 misinformation 
* COVID-19 related conspiracies 
 - Amousey (they/them pronouns) (talk) 10:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support 'COVID-19 misinformation' which mostly encompasses the others. Regarding the second and forth, they are not really conspiracies, they are conspiracy theories. - MrX 🖋 11:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  COVID-19 pandemic wording - it's not a conspiracy 

message: Related discussion, for the interested. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Alternative_medicine#Removal_of_navbox_pages]] 

message: The list of quackeries seems to be in alphabetical order, but Biological terrain assessment is between Homeopathy and Hydrotherapy.  It should be up between Bates method and Black salve, yes?
Also now that I have looked closer, there are a couple of others out of order.  So should the list be kept in alphabetical order or is there some other sorting pattern that I'm not seeing?
- Wikkiwonkk (talk) 02:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to fix these things in the template. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Nah, alphabetical order is the intent. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. - Wikkiwonkk (talk) 05:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Biological terrain assessment" not in correct order?
Talk:Erzurum Congress

message: Is it some kind of joke that an article about an improtant event in Turkish history is being sourced by an armenian's book about the history of armenia. And with armenian writers, it is all about "genocide" propaganda and spreading hatred against Turkey at every opportunity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alper1012 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a joke
Talk:The Ringbanger

message: Buzz Brighton was a character who appeared in only one episode of M*A*S*H.  Does he really deserve his own page?  What can be said about the character that couldn't be said in this episode page?  Should there be a Minor characters of M*A*S*H page? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nearly two months later, and no comments, so I've been bold and changed Buzz Brighton into a redirect to The Ringbanger, and incorporated the only bit of info on that page — that he was played by Leslie Nielsen — into the episode article. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 09:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:The Fountain (comics)

message: I just saw the movie and I plan on reading the graphic novel, after which I will return to this article to clean up, but if someone else wants to get started, the summary is far too long and detailed. Dylan Lake (t·c·ε) 07:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be for the film not the comic. Turkeyphant 15:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Talk about major spoilers for anyone who would want to read the book or watch the movie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.159.192.132 (talk) 18:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  yeah and how about spoilers? 

message: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=4853  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.56.149.121 (talk) 13:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone can edit the entry to update the link - I've done it now but if you see something that needs doing then jump in. (Emperor (talk) 13:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The link in the references section has changed, please edit it
Talk:Policeman (laboratory)

message: I have no source, but I always thought the name of this device came from the term to police an area, ie, to pick up all the trash in that area. Nothing to do with law enforcement, but rather the name of the device where you can police the bottom of your flask to get everything out. 2601:640:8880:2DF0:A590:F552:81F7:DB6C (talk) 02:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name
Talk:Songs for Christmas (Sufjan Stevens album)

message: I think what the two previous editors are saying (122.2.116.195 and MeansEndUpHere) is that the inclusion of Robert Christgau's score doesn't contribute any insight to the article or the album or it isn't notable enough to be included. What do you guys think? Maybe we should have this considered? --:HotDangUntouched 22:13, 09 July 2005 (PST)
:Possibly, and I don't deny that (no casual reader will understand what his scissor comments mean), but we could translate that into the prose at least, or mention that in the edit summary. The edits from the users you mentioned are just going through and removing christgau everywhere, so I'd think their reasoning is a bit more than that. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Christgau 

message: Does anyone have any information on who exactly makes up the rest of Sufjan's "family" in the "family portrait" that comes with the box and has been used as a promo image? I was under the impression that Sufjan was unmarried and had no children. --Albert Martorano 23:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Family" photo? 

message: I think the duration of the song must be 3:18
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djsiesel (talk • contribs) 14:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  That Worst Christmas Ever 

message: I strongly suggest merging all of the individual 'album' articles into this article. They were released as one set, and all of the verifiable information could fit into this article (or already does). Jujutacular talk 12:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (articles redirected here) Jujutacular talk 22:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Sikorsky S-69

message: I am currently working on expanding the text of the article at User:BillCJ/Sandbox/Sikorsky S-69. Feel free to contribute there. Thanks. - BillCJ 04:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion

message: How is the max takeoff weight less than the gross weight? 83.208.241.163 (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum takeoff weight
Talk:Showtime (brand)

message: Is "Showtime Around the World" a slogan or name used by Showtime Networks to refer to stations outside the United States using the Showtime name?  If this is just a descriptive title created by a Wikipedian for an article summarizing all the different television stations using the name Showtime, it should probably be moved to Showtime around the world, per WP:NC#Lowercase second and subsequent words.  Also, if it's a descriptive title, I'm not sure it's at the best: wouldn't something like Television channels using the Showtime name be more precise, since some of these channels (such as Showtime Australia) are unrelated to the American Showtime? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
File talk:Sultans - Sultans cover.jpg

message: Sorry, I am new to uploading images. I have looked at many other uploaded images and do not see any rationale beyond what I have provided here and in the fair use tag. Could you please tell me what would constitute an adequate rationale for this image? I will include it and also add it to other images I have uploaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IllaZilla2 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale?
Talk:Jang (Korean surname)

message: * There seems to be a big vandalism issue here with some "Changism" here. I know Chang last name is cool and all but please stop deleting and changing things around! Please show proper respect towards the articles at Wikipedia and to the surname Chang! Thank you!
*: 14:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism Issue
Talk:Sobhuza II

message: 60 years is long, but List of longest reigning monarchs of all time puts Sobhuza at number 2 spot, after Pepi.  However, Pepi's dates are approximations at best, and have been contested by some Egyptologists.   Certainly Sobhuza seems to hold the record for precisely dated reigns.  How best to make this clear?  JackofOz 07:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention while he was officially the king, he was only 5 months when he became king. I think he wasn't acutally ruling for many years. 57.140.16.20 (talk) 15:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Longest reign on record?

message: Could somebody who knows them, add his full title, with all honorifics, to the article?  jonathon 21:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title with honourifics 

message: Can someone who knows how to do this add a redirect from the spelling "Subhuza."
Evidently some (older?) sources use this spelling.
Thanks
Terry J. Carter (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah I'm Swati and we've been always calling him Sobhuza Bobbyshabangu talk 15:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Redirect from "Subhuza" 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mswati III of Swaziland which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I just noticed that in the article, it says "King Sobhuza II married 24 wives, and had over 67 children between 1920 and 1970. About 54 children survived infancy, and ninety-seven sons and daughters are alive as of July 2000. When he died he had over 1000 grandchildren." Those numbers, added by IP 75.130.165.194 in October, don't add up (since he can't have more children alive now than he had in the first place, so I checked the cited source, and put the verifiable numbers back in.
–eruditionFISH 15:20, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Sobhuza II's children
Talk:LeShuttle

message: Are the shuttles maned?
87.254.68.202 (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  I have added this to the article in a new section "Safety regulations". One of their duties is fire fighting and evacuation, as in the recent 2008 Channel Tunnel fire. TiffaF (talk) 06:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel tunnel shuttle 

message: Proposal to rename the article to "LeShuttle" as that is now the rebranded service name Nathan A RF (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming