Talk:Imagin

message: Just a quick inaccuracy I noticed.
This section of the article states that the Imagin who form a contract with a Singularity Point do not have physical forms outside of DenLiner (as a characteristic of contracts with Singularity Points).  This is not the case.  Ryotaro's Imagin do not have physical forms outside of DenLiner because he did not form any contracts with them.  They may refer to Ryotarou as their "contract holder", but it is simply an easy way of indicating that this is the human they are linked to.
In the beginning of the series, Momotaros would bug Ryotaro to reveal his wish.  Both Momotaros and Kintaros ask Ryotaro for his wish when he seems to be suffering from exhaustion, due to the four Imagin he has to support.  This indicates that no contract exists between Ryotaro and the Imagin.
The Imagin only gain physical forms in the final story arc when Ryotarou inadvertantly tells Kintaros his wish, thus allowing a contract to be formed.  The story kinda fudges it with the other Imagin, but meh.
In short, this section of the article needs to have this inaccuracy removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.55.17 (talk) 19:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singularity Point 

message: I've applied a different style of format to the recent villain entries, but Im having trouble with teh cosmetics of it. Right now, its kind of difficult to distinguish between the field labels and their actual entries. Anyone have any ideas? Floria L 21:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I think. Floria L 22:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: Just wondering what sources state the mythologies supposedly inspiring each villain Imagin.
DJ Kidna 22:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imagin Mythology Basis 

message: The three Gigandeath types are modeled after Ziz, Leviathan, and Behemoth. Fractyl 02:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gigandeath Mythology Basis 

message: The part about "Momohiki" is incorrect.
The correct translation would be "Butt-Hugger".
Considdering Momotaros imature Temper, its not supprising that he hates being called that ("Butt-Hugger" can be seen as a "Gay joke/insult").
:This the TV-Nihon translation?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kintaros 

message: Although, technically, Den-O vs. Shin-O never really happened, should we still validate their Imagin in the article?  That could be put under an "Other Imagin" section or something along those lines. Sekiria 04:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Den-O vs. Shin-O Imagin

message: Just a question.
I see that under Sieg's section, it is pointed out that the word 'Swan' is written on his breastplate. So why not the other Imagins of Ryoutarou's? =)
Thank you.
Flashtrigger (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because "Sieg" is not written on him. All of the other Imagin have their name on them in some form.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imagins' descriptions 

message: Was it verified that the Cho Den-O movie and the events in the Decade series were canon to the original Den-O series? As seen with Hibiki, just because the same cast was used does not mean that it's still the same universe. If it's not canon, wouldn't the descriptions including those events be better served in the Decade and Cho Den-O wikis? DJ Kidna (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on all information, the events of the World of Den-O in Decade and the Cho Den-O Series are canon due to the events of Saraba Den-O.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

text: But in case you're curious, the Alligator Imagin's profile is not on this page as he is more of a Decade villian at the moment until about Chou Den-O installent says otherwise.Fractyl (talk) 03:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The Alligator Imagin is solely found in Decade. Everything else happens in a movie that has Den-O's name listed first.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imagin in Cho Den-O series and Decade series 

message: An image used in this article, File:Kintaros2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Kintaros2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Momotaros.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Momotaros.png Nominated for speedy Deletion