lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:U.S. Route 189

message: The article states: "The Utah department of transportation has placed an end sign at the junction of US-40 in Heber City. However this is in error...".  First, if you know about this, has UDOT been notified?  Most state DOTs are pretty responsive about incorrect signs.  Second, is that really encyclopedic content, or is it trivia?  --Bwagstaff 17:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if its encyclopedic, but the end sign has been there for years and has caused quite a stir among  roadgeeks. I included that sentence, and thought it was mild in comparison to some road geek sites. If you don't think its appropriate reword or remove it. Davemeistermoab 17:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't think it's trivia personally. Including every instance of where the wrong shield or directional banner is used would be, but I think if a road's terminus is errantly signed, especially in this case where it is in no way correct, then it can be mentioned. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: It's not just the sign but when UDOT considers to be the end. --NE2 21:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper "end" sign? 

message: There is an image of US 530 with a caption, but no mention in the article itself about this former highway. Can someone expand on this?  --LJ (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, I screwed that up. Basically, looking at today's map. I-80 through Utah follows the old US-40 from the Nevada line to the modern terminus of US 40. I-80 followed the old US-30S from the modern junction of I-84 and the Wyoming line. Between those two points I-80 was built along the route of a short spur route initially numbered US-530, but later renumbered as part of US-189. I goofed on that one. I'll get to this, or if you want to take a stab, feel free to mop up my mess =-)Dave (talk) 22:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 530? 

message: Reassessed to C due to insufficient referencing in the "History" section. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment
Talk:EEUU

message: Is there a reason why in its Spanish abbreviation it has two Es and two Us instead of one of each? "EU" would make more sense, but it seems to have been "EEUU" for a long time time. Kitabparast 02:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In Latin (From which Spanish is derived) abbreviations of plural things use 2 letters. Which is why John Paul II is PP. Ionnes Paulus (He's the 2nd with the name, hence plural, etc)... 68.39.174.238 06:55, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Es and Us
Talk:Mary I of Portugal

message: D. Maria should be called Mary I of Portugal, because she was born before the 19th century! Please change this because it looks very disrespectful and offensive to portuguese people.
:Is there a rule for not translating the names of monarchs born after the 19th century?Gameiro 02:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be Maria and not Mary, if only for consistency. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 14:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Clutter (advertising)

message: Alright, I watched a PBS video called the Persuaders which mentions this. There's my citation. At any rate, the concept certainly exists. Roman Soldier 02:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The show used the word to express an idea.  That doesn't mean it created a new marketing term. -- Perfecto 02:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

text: You're not going to give up, are you? Here are some more links where clutter is used in this way. 
http://www.questia.com/library/communication/advertising-and-public-relations/advertising-research/advertising-clutter.jsp
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=clutter+marketing+advertising
Will you removed the OR tag or shall I? Roman Soldier 03:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Advertising clutter is the term, then.  It gives 230K hits in Google.  Isn't it a lot better when we provide sources to our edits? -- Perfecto 11:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: About Original Research
Talk:U.S. Route 264

message: The graphics show US 264 reaching NC12 at Nags Head - whereas I think the eastern endpoint is actually in Manns Harbor in Mainland Dare at the 64/264 junction - Can someone fix this ? Ivan Warren 16:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct, US 264 ends at Manns Harbor; I will see if I can get somebody from the maps task force to help, but they are probably busy to help correct anytime soon. --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised map needed
Talk:Baucis and Philemon

message: Is it just me or does the content of this article ring tones of the Bible story of Sodom and Gomorrah? Both stories involve two entities from the heavens coming into a sinful city. They also both involve the entities destroying the city in a flood like way & climbing a mountain without looking back. Well? Spawn Man 02:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible similarites... 

message: If it only appears in Ovid, should they not be used, or at least mentioned?
Johnbod 03:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's a good point. --Wetman 08:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jupiter & Mercury 

message: Genesis 19:1 is about Lot and his wife, not about Abraham and Sarah. I believe there's another place that mentiones the latter couple's encounter with the angels undercover. --A. Gharbeia (talk) 01:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genesis 1:19
Talk:Stanisław Kosior

message: "In January 1938 he also became head of the Soviet Control Office deputy prime minister of the USSR. However, with the advent of the Great Purge, by order of Joseph Stalin, on May 3, 1938 Kosior was deprived of all party posts and arrested by the NKVD..."
This wasn't the advent of the purge; actually it was towards the end of it. Apparently he was still in favor in Jan. 1938 (by which time the purges had peaked), but fell shortly thereafter. So obviously this needs a little reworking and explanation (which I'm not knowledgeable enough to do). Everyking 02:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...
Talk:U.S. Route 48 (1926)

message: *US 99 at Manteca - 1925 proposal
*US 99 at French Camp - 1926 1926 (unclear)
*unclear - 1931
*(as US 50) US 99W at French Camp - 1933 (Stockton inset, showing 99E and 99W)
*(as US 50) US 99 at Stockton, via present I-5 and SR 4 - 1942 (Stockton inset) 1954 (55?)
According to  it became part of US 50 in 1934 or 1935.  says it was truncated to Mossdale in 1929, but that doesn't make sense given the maps. It also gives a death date of 1931, which does match the maps.
LRN 4 (US 99) originally went via French Camp; LRN went west from there on US 48/US 50. The new (east) alignment was built in ? and became US 99E ca. 1929 (according to ), while the old route became US 99W. Ca. 1933 US 99E became US 99 and US 99W died (becoming part of US 50 north of French Camp). It appears there was no LRN assigned to US 99W south of French Camp; LRN 5 ran north to Stockton once LRN 4 moved east. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 23:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: East end
Talk:U.S. Route 64

message: Arizona has been pulled out due to the portion in Arizona not being a part of the National Highway System.  Also, a state specific U.S. Route 64 in Arizona will not exist due to it being only four miles long and just a two-lane rural highway in the state.  --Holderca1 talk 15:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arizona assessment

message: The text of the Wikipedia US 64 article says that the North Carolina portion is 563 miles; the table of lengths in the different states says 604 miles, and the US 64 in North Carolina page says 614.9 miles.  Which is it?  I have seen mile markers > 600 on the Outer Banks, so 563 seems very suspect. Edgy4 (talk) 21:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistent measures of length in North Carolina

message: I haven't been terribly active on Wikipedia for a while and so I hesitate to stick my head out and edit, but should the article not be edited to remove all these "Main article" links which do nothing more than link back to this article? As a reader, that link tells me "There's a place to go for more in-depth information" than the article I'm reading, but in EVERY case in this article, it simply redirects me back to the same article. - Cafemusique (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You raise a durned good point there.  --Onore Baka Sama (talk) 16:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links redirecting to this article

message: What else do we need to move this table + other info to U.S. Route 64 in Arkansas? This beautiful junction list is currently hidden on the talk page, where zero casual readers would see it. Brandonrush Woo pig sooie 03:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article

message: I propose to merge U.S. Route 64 in Arizona here. It is quite short and has no major historical significance or major intersections. — PCB 00:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Design for manufacturability (IC)

message: Is "Design for manufacturability" a concept specific to integrated circuitry design, or does the term have applications in general product design? Because if it's the latter case, perhaps the lead section should be re-written as an overview of the term and concepts, with sub-sections dealing with DFM applications in specific product areas.--Muchness 02:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is DFM specific to integrated circuit design?
Talk:Manx English

message: A number of terms have been added, or supplemented, with assertions that the terms are in use in 2021. Wikipedia requires references rather than original research, so an assertion that the term is "in use" should be backed up by a reference - typically something like an academic study, newspaper article or other definitive source. The additions about 2021 usage are currently marked with "citation needed" and should be removed if no citations can be provided. As a guideline, other Anglo-Manx phrases in the wiki are typically referenced with sources such as A.W. Moore's published work.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.107.3.244 (talk) 12:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "In use in 2021"

message: Please note published books are under copyright until 70 years after the author's death, not 70 years after publication. As such, the book most of this is taken from is probably still under copyright, unless the author died the same year as the book was published. It would probably be best to remove the direct quote until the author's year of death can be established. --Angr (tɔk) 17:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: Skutch is defined as a quantity.  Is it meant to be a lot or a little, both are quantities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.94.217 (talk) 08:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skutch:  A lot or a little 

message: Is there actually an ISO language code for Manx English?  My guess would be en-IM, but I haven't found a source for that. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 19:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language code 

message: The content of List of English words of Manx origin can be added to the Anglo-Manx phrases section of the Manx English page. HapHaxion (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As an alternative to deletion (which also would have been reasonable),  Klbrain (talk) 13:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[List of English words of Manx origin]]
Talk:45 nm process

message: "Although research is just beginning, the successors to 45nm technology will be 32 nm, 22 nm, then 10 nm technology."
Can you please provide an article that supports this. I have heard of the upcoming 32 nm technology, but not about the 22 nm and 10 nm transistor standards. KBi 03:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provide an article 

message: *From the article: "(For more information on this subject, see this Slashdot discussion: [1].)"  This is a joke, right? 198.205.32.93 14:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For more information, see Slashdot? 

message: The SRAM cell area is published but the pitch is hard to judge from the SEM photo, especially if the photo aspect ratio was distorted during copy/paste. So the 180 nm pitch estimate is a guess, but based on a dangerous assumption.218.168.137.225 13:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SRAM cell 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 40 nm. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 22:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  40 nm listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kansas City Prophets

message: The Kansas City Prophets was a major movement among Charismatic Christians around 1990.
That it was a major movement might be a bit of an overstatement; however, it is not so trivial as to not require an article.
I tried to give the article NPOV, more felicitous language.  I propose to merge it with Apostolic-Prophetic Movement,
for the reason stated above (by someone else). Aminorex 16:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Antonio Palomino

message: This article was originally created at Acisclo Antonio Palomino de Castro y Velasco based on a 1911 Britannica article.  I moved it here because I believe that "Acisclo" was actually an OCR error for "Aciselo," which is what the current Britannica has.  Why, you ask, did I not then move it to "Aciselo"?  Well, "Acislo" is the spelling in the Columbia Encyclopedia and gets Google hits at independent websites, whereas "Aciselo" gets no hits outside of Britannica.  If you know more information, feel free to move it somewhere else (and, since you know so much about the gentleman, expand the article).  Chick Bowen 03:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:TIE interceptor

message: Disagree. The 181st is distinct from the actual vessel they use- what if they changed from TIE/Ins to TIE Defenders (as they might have; I don't quite recall)? Would they moved to another section? --Maru  (talk) Contribs 03:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged it with Minor star wars organizations, since it was listed under Star wars "organisation". Deckiller 03:32, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Buddhist temples in Japan

message: Please do not remove the link to the Herbert Offen Research Collection at the Peabody Essex Museum.  It is a comprehensive, well known, and well respected bibliography.  It has a great deal of information on exactly this subject.  (February 25, 2010)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.200.185.18 (talk) 19:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbert Offen Research Collection

message: The article needs a section about the shinbutsu bunri and another about the haibutsu kishaku. -Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: This article is contradicting with definition of word temple. It's obvious that most Buddhist places in Japan are shrines. 61.215.99.250 (talk) 06:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction: temple / shrine 

message: A lot of content is duplicated in this article and in Japanese Buddhist architecture. This should be rationalised. This article should contain just a summary of the architecture information. The other option is to merge the two articles, but I'm not sure that's a good idea. Nurg (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication with 'Japanese Buddhist architecture' article
Talk:Bramston

message: I'm sure it's a fabulous boarding house but do 99% of its pupils really go to Oxbridge? And 15 Olypians - can that be verified? Few if any of the famous old  Bramstonians listed appear to be notable. Suggest the contents of the article be cleaned up and merged with Oundle School. Likewise for the previous content of New House. - Gimboid13 03:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:Patrik Sundström

message: Sundstrom no longer holds the Canucks franchise record for most goals in a single season by a center with 38. Ryan Kesler scored 41 goals in the 2010-2011 season.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.245.214 (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record
Talk:Tornado of Souls

message: please less speculation and more fact; I like this song as much as the next guy but let's try to keep wikipedia as unbiased as possible.
Is this article even necessary? Willbyr 19:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please use WP:MUSICRS to determine what makes good sources..
 scope_creepTalk 10:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback from New Page Review process
Talk:Halo 2/List of multiplayer gametypes in Halo 2

message: Clarified and removed jargon from section Multiplayer Maps. Should there be an inclusion about the amount of cheating done by players on XBL during ranked games? Also, Tower of Power usually is played S.W.A.T. style but that might be just our play group. DeathscytheH64 04:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you propose we remedy this suckness? ˉˉanetode╦╩ 22:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

message: we should make a custom game types part.
F 22 10:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed a sprawling mass of custom game types that pparently constituted most of the article. — TKD::Talk 11:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  custom 
Talk:Screw 32

message: Exactly what I said. Bigtime. Phrases like 'about a million t-shirts' need to go. There's one section with a right-facing parenthese but no left-facing one; I'm sure it's a typo but it really needs some help. Perhaps it could say 'write' instead of 'tag'; sounds a bit unprofessional. It [the article] does a pretty good job of staying impersonal and objective, but some things, like those I've mentioned above, need help. And I am far too lazy to just do it myself. 208.54.40.142 (talk) 21:54, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup...
Talk:Thérèse Humbert

message: Added book review after the fact. Didn't do close fact check.--FloNight 04:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Add Book Review

message: But not sure how to incorporate it. French Wikipedia references the French 1936 census & Paris-soir, 15 May 1939, proving that she was still alive & living in Paris - & her husband died 14 Dec 1937, not 1936.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9r%C3%A8se_Humbert
Archives de Paris [archive] Recensement de population, 17e arrondissement, quartier des Batignolles, elle est recensée sous le nom de d'Aurignac en 1936 avec son mari et leur fille au 4, boulevard des Batignolles, vue 2/254.
https://www.retronews.fr/journal/paris-soir/15-mai-1939/131/97695/3
Archives de Paris Acte de décès no 2590 du 14/12/1937 d'Eugène Frédéric Gaston Humbert, dressé au 17e arrondissement le surlendemain, vue 9/24.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjirving (talk • contribs) 20:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Found additional information
Talk:Playalinda Beach

message: Not sure how to add this as part of the Florida Wikiproject?
This page needs lots of work.
* Disambiguate it with another location of the same name in (I think) Brazil. - Completed
* Talk about the park.  Management; fees; etc. - Completed
* Properties of the beach - Completed. 
* Nearby NASA KSC and its launches and park closures and therefore beach closures - Completed and provided link to the shuttle countdown.
{JohnWalton031954 (talk) 01:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:KylieFever

message: I'm pretty sure the verison performed on the tour was "Can't get blue momday out of my head". I'm sure its what I heard on the DVD release. Underneath-it-All 04:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version of CGYOOMH 
Talk:Ochsner Baptist Medical Center

message: This page needs to describe the institution as it currently exists and operates in 2019. It needs a full description of today's organization, services, ratings and accreditation, staffing qualifications, population served, (success and failure) statistics, and links to both the institution's and its parents websites. In short, the usual components of ANY Wikipedia hospital entry. Every one of which the page currently lacks. 
As presently constituted, this page can be generously characterized as a mere footnote to a 10 year-old controversy prompted by a television network report of an inconclusive investigation of a predecessor institution occupying the same physical site. At worst, it might be characterized as tepid commercial slander. 
I submit that, as it stands, there is neither current relevance nor need in Wikipedia for this page. Westernesse (talk) 04:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protest over page content
Talk:Chenjerai Hunzvi

message: Added obit after the fact. Didn't do detailed fact-check.--FloNight 04:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article makes multiple inflammatory, unsourced claims. It looks like a BLP disaster waiting to happen. --Marvin Diode (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a BLP; he died in 2001. But, at first glance, I agree that the verifiability of the article needs improvement. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at it a bit more, I am less sure about that statement. The article does seem to cite reliable sources for the things it says. If any particular statements need better sourcing, I suggest for them to be tagged with  to identify the issues. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

message: Note the capitalisation: "products" has a lower-case initial letter. Loganberry (Talk) 05:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: While that was the case, with the new April 2013 branding it is now uppercase. Thomas d stewart (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Evidence? Senator2029 “Talk” 18:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation
Talk:Webelos rank (Cub Scouts (Boy Scouts of America))

message: I support the Proposed merge, as this article is linked to other cub scout ranks, and that article has far more detail. --ender 05:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is proposed that the Cub Scout ranks be merged into one article per discussin at the Scouting portal.  Please discuss at Talk:Advancement in Cub Scouts (Boy Scouts of America).
--Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:27, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:The Viking (1928 film)

message: "The Viking (1928) was the first sound feature film made in colour."
*This is a very strong statement to make without providing a reference. If anyone can veryify this, please add a reference. P0per 05:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Fred E. Basten, In Glorious Technicolor (Easton Studio Press, 2005), and Richard W. Haines, Technicolor Movies: The History of Dye Transfer Printing (McFarland & Company, 2003). I have removed the claim that The Viking did not do well because it lacked dialogue. Many other features without dialogue did very well at the box office in 1928 and early 1929. — Walloon 00:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled