Talk:Diana Johnson

message: This page needs a photo Matthewfelgate 14:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diana Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081016072646/http://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/law to http://www.brunel.ac.uk/about/acad/law
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diana Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170107173500/http://www.haemophilia.org.uk/what_we_do/influencing_advocacy/all_party_parliamentary_group to http://www.haemophilia.org.uk/what_we_do/influencing_advocacy/all_party_parliamentary_group
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: For some incomprehensible reason, all her shadow jobs have gone.--86.182.186.188 (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shadow jobs 

message: As we now it is important to show a NPOV on wikipedia, I understand that due to a lack of reporting from the mainstream outlets and abortion rights groups the sources I have used are one sided. I have tried to balance the campaign up as much as possible but I fear it come across as less than neutral.
Obviously it has to be stated truthfully how her amendment would have changed current legislation, especially as there was no clarification from her. However, again I can understand how this would come across as not NPOV. 
I've tried to keep it neutral as possible but been a bit difficult and because it is such a contentious issue I don't want to be editing pages without support. The last thing I want is a biased article on a politicians page and the last thing I want is someone removing her recent amendment to avoid any criticism of her. We have to remain neutral. So any help to ensure that it's included but not biased would be much appreciated.
It just needs some additional sources from proposers and ideally neutral sources. Any help would be much appreciated.
As Keith D has recently edited and removed one that was biased, I would appreciate if he took a look at it
--Blackwater-Bradfield1900 (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abortion 

message: Hello guys, 
Please excuse me, but I'm new to Wikipedia. I would just like to suggest that a section or paragraph be dedicated to Diana's charitable work, specifically the relentless work she has done as an MP campaigning for, and on behalf of those infected and affected by the Contaminated Blood Scandal.  Diana is Chair of the APPG for Haemophilia, and has spent numerous parliamentary hours on the subject for over a decade now and was pivotal in securing the ongoing Infected Blood Inquiry. Surely this should be recognised on her Wikipedia page?  It is after-all, this work that specifically tipped the balance in her receiving her DBE in 2020. 2A00:23C8:6B8B:BF01:1D1:E2B2:DA89:96F (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charitable Work