lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Australia at the 2006 Winter Olympics

message: Natalie Duncan and Gemma Johnson
The two people fail the google test, so I'm temporarily moving them to the talk page pending verification. Andjam 11:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra bobsled team

message: Hi there. I've just used Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser to do a minor clean up of this article. If you have any concerns about the result, please don't hesitate to drop me a note on my talk page. Thanks! Very kind regards —Encephalon 06:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AWB-assisted edit 
Talk:Daegu Metro

message: The system map should be updated, please, since Line 3 has been opened by now. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 03:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 
Talk:Mir Taqi Mir

message: A cursory google search suggests that both the names are equally popular. However, I propose retention of this article as it is of an older vintage and has more edit history. I would wait for a week for comments before effecting the merge. Thanks, --Gurubrahma 11:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Meer Taqi Meer]] 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 02:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:South Carolina in the American Revolution

message: There was no such thing as the "the Republic of South Carolina" -- that was a misunderstanding by amateur historians over 200 years later. South Carolina was a state, sent voting delegates to the Continental Congress, sent troops to the Continental Army, and was considered by everyone to be a full part of the United States of America.  People who seem to think there was such a "Republic" need to get a source.  Rjensen 11:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I added a citation at the end of the second paragraph.  It shows on the "edit this page" view, but does not appear below as a citation.--Parkwells (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with in-line citation

message: I think the American Revolution was a very very sad day for millions of people. 2600:380:E8A9:9760:F1FB:42A1:241C:F097 (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Revolution 

message: The article has almost no reference. The two encyclopedias are inevitably biased. A couple of specifics:
- it refers to "the Americans". The loyalists were Americans too. 
- The section entitled General Clinton's Mistakes describes three mistakes. These are someone’s opinion. No source is identified.
It has been flagged as needing inline citations for five years. At the end of 2023 it has only five, the same five as in 2018.
Since the material is covered elsewhere, perhaps the article should be deleted. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view
Talk:Pallywood

message: A few weeks ago, a very pro-Israel wikipedian asked the deletion of the french language Wikipedia article fr:Pallywood. I guess that the motive is obvious. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 10:18, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021-07 deletion of french language Wikipedia article 

message: Please change "say" to "said" in the second line of Other Uses. HerPOV (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 November 2023 

message: Change “Needless to say, such episodes don’t instil an abiding trust in subsequent Palestinian claims, at least until they’re verified."[16]” to “Needless to say, such episodes don’t instil an abiding trust in subsequent Palestinian claims, at least until they’re verified."[16] Philip Weiss has echoed the concerns of others that use of the term amounts to “denial of war crimes”. [17] ”
Citation #17 for edit: 
https://mondoweiss.net/2023/10/an-americans-shattered-faith/
(Reasoning: The “Other Uses” portion of the page includes only conservative Jewish and/or Israeli voices around the use of the term “Pallywood” as well as a quote from Michelle Malkin, who is now widely considered as antisemitic by the community and has been dropped by organizations such as the Young Americans Foundation as a result. It would be valuable to neutrality to include the voice of a Jewish progressive perspective on this section. I have cited the article above, written in 2023 by Philip Weiss of Mondoweiss. Philip Weiss’ name should further be linked to his Wikipedia page when mentioned: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Weiss) 142.198.100.236 (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this material. It was a largely self-published, with a further permanent dead link to a defunct organisation. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 November 2023 

message: Is Mondoweiss even a reliable source?  Not sure why it's used on this article, when it's surrounded by constant acrimony... AnonMoos (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: usage of mondoweiss is fine. officially, mondoweiss' reliability is listed as "no consensus" (its in WP:RSP), and it's recommended that wikipedia editors attribute whatever statements they use, which this article has done. Elehnsherr (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

text: FYI, its reliability is now discussed here. Alaexis¿question? 07:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mondoweiss 

message: They clearly are not WP:NPOV and provide a lot more polarized claims in one direction without any criticism. They belong more in the historical section, and should also be placed in context with what others say. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and remove those sentences. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the last two sentences of lead
Talk:Europa (rocket)

message: I dislike the phrase "total failure".  Whilst it is true that no launches were successful, there may have been benefits in terms of technology development and experience gained that were beneficial to the successor organisations.  I expect that this was the case (although I don't know for sure).
Moreover, the projects may have also been successfully managed in the other aspects of time and budget.
Again, I have no specific knowledge of these aspects.
Future versions of this article should at least be open to this possibility. - User:Matt Whyndham
Let's not forget NPOV as well --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: There is an excellent analysis of the failure of Europa and the ELDO in Stephen Johnson's book "The Secret of Apollo".  The book deals with systems management, ELDO being the example of what happens when you don't do it.  He points out that the "space race" began with three runners, but ELDO failed so early in the game that it isn't widely remembered today. DonPMitchell (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Secret of Apollo 

message: Blue Streak, along with the UK's TN weapons, were cancelled after the Nassau agreement in 1960. The US made the UK use their weapons, and Polaris/Trident subs, and in exchange the UK were given exclusive rights to supply all WG Plutonium for the common weapons. The Hanford Reactor, which exclusively made WG Pu, was mothballed in 1970. Blue Streak was then further developed for launching LEO vehicles. The engine is not to be confused with the Wolseley Blue Streak Six. So named because there was always a blue streak of burnt oil coming from the exhaust!220.244.87.218 (talk) 04:25, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidbits of History 
Talk:Transcendent Pig

message: Hmm... Is this somehow related to Zhu Bajie?
:No. They do appear to be opposites though --Auric 22:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Searching for references lead me to this volume:
The Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology (1994)
There are some passing mentions in Hughart's Story of the Stone, and another mention in Bridge of Birds (line 32).
--Auric  talk 23:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Ian Allan Publishing

message: NPOV - Much of this article seems to be blatant advertising. I accept the need fot this article, but it needs to be toned down. --Tivedshambo 11:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, if you are in England and looking for information about rail or bus transport companies, their history, their development, and often their modelling, you will go to this company catalogue.  --SockpuppetSamuelson 12:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. I wasn't aware of the advert tag. --Tivedshambo 22:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Great improvement - well done!  Tivedshambo (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I am planning to write a biography of Ian Allan. He died on 28 June 2015.. Biscuittin (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: New article Ian Allan (publisher). Biscuittin (talk) 21:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Montauk Building

message: #Isn't the correct title Montauk Block? --Wetman 12:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Minimaze procedure

message: Excellent article.  The references should be wikified. Dlodge 00:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is in progress in my sandbox - User:Dlodge/Sandbox/Maze procedure.  I will continue the edit and make the new Maze procedure page soon. Dlodge 21:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Field equation

message: I created this article some time ago (the anon was me) and realise that it needs a huge cleanup. Amongst many other things, perhaps examples of field equations from important theories should be included. MP   (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early thread 

message: Following wp:BRD, I have reverted the 13 May 2017 version of this article to the version as last edited by Maschen (2 Jan 2017). Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We appear to have an obvious consensus, since, in addition to Maschen and myself, User:Rgdboer has thought it worthwhile to initiate edits on the reverted version. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I reverted a change User:Rgdboer made. If a field is periodically disturbed, this will generate waves (as time and space varying configurations of the field). This totally separate from varying the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian density to derive field equations. This should also be clear from the first subsection also. M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 09:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold Revert Discuss of Field Equation 

message: One source which could come in the article soon is Fields, Flows and Waves: An Introduction to Continuum Models by Parker. It does contain a variety of phenomena, but its scope is fairly restricted (non-relativistic and non-quantum). 
It seems this is as good as it gets. There seems to be no source which discusses all field equations in a unified way. M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 10:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source?
Talk:Nick Riewoldt

message: Nick Riewoldt is regarded highly in the football world, yet he still doesn't  have a photo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.3.137 (talk) 00:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 

message: the claim under the '2008 season' about Riewoldt not standing up when the team needs him should be cited by a professional sorce.Not only have I never heard this claim made in the media but there is considerable evidence that it is false. If this criticism was was ever infact made by a reliable un-bias source it should be cited otherwise deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.10.82 (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seemed to be someone's personal opinion - it's now been removed. Somno (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited claim 

message: wat happened to this article. last time i was here it had a reasonal amount of information. where did it all go?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.195.171 (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wat the? 

message: Nick Riewoldt is Currently Dating american, Catherine Heard and first took her into the eyes of the public on Monday 20th Of Septemeber 2010, the 2010 brownlow medal count night
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.20.113 (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ♥LOVE LIFE♥ 

message: He's front page news and yet his bio doesn't mention it - any reason why? --Pete (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I want to know why too 118.209.65.244 (talk) 11:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How come...? 

message: I reverted the edit removing the photo controversy section because the section was well cited, and it seemed to have been widely reported. Not sure why it's not relevant. Agtx (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo controversy 
Talk:Propylhexedrine

message: "Freebase propylhexedrine is a volatile, oily liquid at room temperature. The slow evaporation of freebase propylhexedrine allows it to be administered via inhalation. The evaporation of the freebase also accounts for the limited shelf-life of propylhexedrine inhalers. Many of the salts of propylhexedrine are stable, clear to off-white crystalline substances that readily dissolve in water."
I cannot verify this passage in ref:
* [32] US granted 4095596, Grayson M, "Nasal Inhaler", issued 20 June 1978, assigned to Smithkline Corp
* [33] Mancusi-Ungaro HR, Decker WJ, Forshan VR, Blackwell SJ, Lewis SR (1983). "Tissue injuries associated with parenteral propylhexedrine abuse". Journal of Toxicology. Clinical Toxicology. 21 (3): 359–372. doi:10.1097/00005373-198307000-00114. PMID 6144800.
Mongrangvebet (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The first reference serves to prove that propylhexedrine gradually escapes from an inhaler, which gives a standard nasal inhaler with it as the active ingredient a limited shelf-life. The second indicates that the ingredient is "relatively pure propylhexedrine hydrochloride" which is freebase propylhexedrine. It also demonstrates that the salt was soluble in water. I don't know if there is an indication of the color and solubility of other salts, since it looks like that second reference may be longer than the abstract I can see? Reconrabbit 14:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The second ref ([33])  (free accessed) links to page 650. It should link to page 359–372. I recommend use this ref  Mongrangvebet (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of base
Talk:Vince Wells

message: Shouldn't this be at Vince Wells, for the same reason we don't have Jack Russell at Robert Russell? I can't remember Wells ever being called anything other than Vince. Loganberry (Talk) 02:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right; I think two and a half years is long enough for people to have registered objections! Since nobody has, I'll make the move. Loganberry (Talk) 00:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vincent?
Talk:Lurk

message: This article reads like a summary of the text at Lurker, so I've been bold and changed it to a redirect. The only articles linking to it are non-mainspace.
* Wikipedia:Graphics in two modes
* User:Tronatz
* Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/GeneralxHotlist
* User:Scott Paeth
CS Miller 12:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Financial export

message: I've attempted to get the references from the FT website, but they're for both Registered Users and were not responding to being uploaded onto the browser (appears to be some technical error in the loading system). Still, I'll keep a look out for them. Nick Kerr 13:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Propose merging this article into the section Financial Services#Financial exports, which seems to be a good fit, uncontroversial and gets 10 times as many views. Whizz40 (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Going ahead with the move since it seems like an improvement and uncontroversial. Whizz40 (talk) 12:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Middle Irish

message: This is entirely obsolete. "Middle Irish" is today only used for the form of the language used in the 10th to 12th centuries, i.e. after Old Irish but before Classical (Early Modern) Irish. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.16.202.19 (talk • contribs) .
: You seem to know what you're talking about; can you then edit the article or provide a reference for more information so we can do the same? --Saforrest 17:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The anon is quite right; I'm adding some sources showing that the term "Middle Irish" refers to the language only to the end of the 12th century. —Angr 21:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated definition

message: Why is that there? What is said has nothing to do with Irish, Middle or not. It should be on a page about Lebor Bretnach, if anything, not Middle Irish. If it stays, it should be made relevant to the page topic somehow. Graidan (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lebor Bretnach 

message: This article is rather meagre, especially compared to the Old Irish article. In particular, I miss a lot of linguistic information: what makes it distinct from Old Irish and Early Modern Irish? How did the sounds evolve? Where did the grammar stand on the continuum from synthetic to analytic? Did the dual still exist? The accusative case? How far apart were the dialects at this stage? There must be enough people around here who know. Steinbach (talk) 13:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit more, please...? 

message: In addition to the above complaint, I'd like to remark the following. According to the article, the name of the language was 'Gaoidhealg', pronounced [ˈɡɯːʝeɫɡ]. Was that really the pronunciation in Middle Irish? Or is that rather how this word would be pronounced by a modern speaker of Irish? Back in the 10th century, it probably sounded more like [gaʊðjæɫg]. Or maybe I'm mistaken - but isn't it very unlikely that a scribe back than would have written his language so un-phonetically? Steinbach (talk) 12:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Dún Eogain Bél forsind loch forsrala ilar tréntroch,
ní mair Eogan forsind múr ocus maraid in sendún.
Maraid inad a thige irraibe ’na chrólige,
ní mair in rígan re cair nobíd ina chomlepaid.
Cairptech in rí robúi and, innsaigthech oirgnech Érenn,
ní dechaid coll cána ar goil, rocroch tríchait im óenboin.
Roloisc Life co ba shecht, rooirg Mumain tríchait fecht,
nír dál do Leith Núadat nair co nár dámair immarbáig.
Doluid fecht im-Mumain móir do chuinchid argait is óir,
d’iaraid sét ocus móine do gabail gíall [n]dagdóine.
Trían a shlúaig dar Lúachair síar co Cnoc mBrénainn isin slíab,
a trían aile úad fo dess co Carn Húi Néit na n-éces.
Sé fodéin oc Druimm Abrat co trían a shlúaig, nísdermat,
oc loscud Muman maisse, ba subach don degaisse.
Atchím a chomarba ind ríg a mét dorigne d’anfhír,
nenaid ocus tromm ’malle, conid é fonn a dúine. 98.3.103.238 (talk) 17:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The poem, what does it mean?
Talk:Outline of organic gardening and farming

message: Why isn't all this stuff just put onto the :Category:Organic_gardening page (by putting in the appropriate tags on the pages listed here)? SB Johnny 13:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that if it was just a straight list, I would agree with you, but it is organized in a useful way that wouldn't be possible in a category page.  Also, there many articles in this list, such as rabbit, that don't really belong in the organic gardening category.  ike9898 13:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In answer to Johnny's question, most of this page was originally put together by myself in the days before Wikipedia categories had been developed- I had the idea of this page acting as a kind of 'contents page' to an organic gardening encyclopedia within wikipedia- as Ike points out the information is listed in a more organised manner than a Category page, which simply puts the articles in alphabetical order, so it has an advantage being a 'list'. It would be good if the Gardening and Horticulture project could develop this section of the wikipedia in the future quercus robur 16:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Maybe the best thing to do would be to put category tags on some of those pages. (Thanks for mentioning the project, Q.r., it's: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Horticulture_and_Gardening. Please lend a hand!)  SB Johnny 14:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lepenski Vir

message: 1) Why delete all photos? 
2) Lepenski Vir III was obviously neolithic: Bones of dog, cattle, less of sheep, goats and pigs.
                  
The détailed German wikipedia article needs to be incorporated (without its misleading time scale).
Nuremberg  -  Ángel.García  131.188.3.20 (talk) 21:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1) Why delete the illustrations?  -  2) Mesolithic AND neolithic! 

message: I merged the content of Lepenski Vir sculptures here. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Nectar (loyalty card)

message: ===Barcodes===
The barcode on the rear of the card is a Code-128 code representing the last 12 digits from the Nectar card number embossed on the front of the card.
195.59.147.60 (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For me, removing the initial digit from the 12-digit barcode, resulting in 11 digits, then prefixing with the standard 98263000, resulted in my Nectar card number. Andrew Oakley (talk) 11:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Cards

message: The barcode on the rear of the card is a Code-128 code representing the last 12 digits from the Nectar card number embossed on the front of the card.
195.59.147.60 (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: For me, removing the initial digit from the 12-digit barcode, resulting in 11 digits, then prefixing with the standard 98263000, resulted in my Nectar card number. Andrew Oakley (talk) 11:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Barcodes

message: I want to have a nectar card 2A02:C7C:8A0D:3200:7403:D193:2AED:D198 (talk) 15:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want a nectar card
Talk:List of places in Norfolk

message: Removed from list of places - plenty of other links so probably not required.
*Norfolk hawker - a dragonfly  Rob 13:45, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would someone care to locate Aughton? I cannot locate it on Multimap and there is no entry for it in the gazetteer at List of United Kingdom locations: A. Also no entry for it on the Aughton dab page. I assume that it should be disambiguated to Aughton, Norfolk.
Keith D 10:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it as it was unverifiable. snigbrook (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aughton 