lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:London Necropolis railway station

message: The first paragraph of this section virtually mirrors one in the ample page on the London Necropolis Company and could do with editing to concentrate on the railway related points - those concerning non-railway connected aspects of Brookwood Cemetery for instance could be judiciously deleted.  The same could be said of references to the Cemetery in other sections that do not connect closely to the topic heading but which are adequately covered in detail in the article on the LNC and Brookwood Cemetery pages.Cloptonson (talk) 09:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Examples of text that could be deleted are footnotes 1 and 3.Cloptonson (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the footnote regarding the first burials.Cloptonson (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Operations' section

message: I suggest 'Background' should be looked at closely for editing, as it mirrors similar information in the article on the LNC, as much of it does not touch on the heading topic of this article.Cloptonson (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Background section
Talk:Brookings effect

message: Locally this is usually called the Chetco Effect. --72.173.170.41 (talk) 22:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Merged to Brookings, Oregon#Climate. I made an attempt to distill the sourced information in this article into something that would be appropriate for the Brookings, Oregon page, but feel free to edit as necessary. (non-admin closure)  --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 17:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Brookings effect →  – One source has "Chetco effect" in the title; the other doesn't seem to use either term (but I might have missed something). KJ7RRV (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

text: I think it would be best to have it as a sentence at Brookings, Oregon#Climate, Foehn wind, and it already has sufficient mention at Chetco River#Watershed. A full section gives it undue weight in my opinion. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

text: I haven't looked deep into the subject so if you believe a more thorough explanation is warranted on those pages I don't have an issue with that. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 01:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 March 2022
File talk:Chickasaw seal.svg

message: This SVG image is displaying as transparent on this page, but it looks fine on the actual pages. If anyone knows why it's invisible here, please let me know so I can fix it. -kotra 21:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be displaying properly now. Weird. -kotra (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Prostatitis/Archive 1

message: The original text of this article was taken from an NIH public domain document NIH Publication No. 00-4553, at http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health/urolog/summary/prostat/prostat.htm 
I have my doubts there will ever be subpages on the various types of prostatitis. I've left the links for what they are, but sometimes it's better to delete them before someone writes a stub that has to be merged into the main article later.... JFW | T@lk 14:57, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: The material on the pelvic myoneuropathy theory and on the Stanford protocol don't look solid.  They were added by an anon, User:216.31.66.130, with no other edits, and they do not seem to be mainstream (Google search on [Stanford-protocol prostate site:edu] or [... site:gov]).  I am adding fact tags until these claims can be better sourced. --Macrakis 00:36, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * The Stanford Protocol is scientifically accepted and published in the best medical journals. See this for starters and there is a more recent study too. I'll review your fact tags and modify if appropriate. Skoppensboer 17:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pelvic Myoneuropathy and the Stanford protocol

message: I have removed comments (mainly speculative and all unsupported) made by persistent anonymous posters trying to relate CPPS to bacterial infection, BPH and prostate cancer. These issues have long been settled in the scientific sphere, although unfortunately many urologists still treat the condition with antibiotics, causing much misunderstanding and confusion. Skoppensboer 17:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bacterial Etiology Theories for CPPS 

message: I've removed this recent addition because 1) it is not part of the NIH classification system and 2) it is not a recognized entity with any scientific support. If it belongs anywhere, it is as a footnote to possible causes of Type III(b) prostatitis. Skoppensboer 18:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Non -specific prostatitis" 

message: * To the physician who is keen to see treatments for Cat. III listed according to the categories of Evidence-based medicine, I urge you to submit an excel spreadsheet in which you tabulate each treatment and cross-ref it to type of evidence collected for that treatment. This table can then be converted to a wikitable and added to the document, and will make a nice addition. If you need help, go to my talk page to discuss.  Skoppensboer 22:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence-Based Medicine - Tabulate results
Talk:Huntridge Theater

message: Hi.  I just updated the infobox and moved the coordinates info into that.  The default display for NRHP infoboxes puts in a big map of Nevada.  If you don't like that, you can just turn off the display by changing from "locmapin = Nevada" to "locmapin = ".  --doncram 19:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  show map or not 

message: Just sayin’. Maybe somebody can actually improve the article with more than a blurb that sounds like it’s either a blog, or a rough draft for a pamphlet at the airport.
2600:8801:E00:760:E06B:88D8:7E46:A437 (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a personal blog
Talk:CT Corporation

message: I am an employee in the marketing department of Wolters Kluwer.  Our subsidiary, CT is now known simply as "CT" and should no longer be referred to as CT Corporation.  Since I am an employee of the company, I did not want to edit the article in keeping with your "no autobiography" rule.  By the way, our thanks to the author! 208.203.201.46 21:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome ;-) If you have any other pertinent company information or insights and you do not feel it is appropriate for you to post them yourself, please put in the talk page with citations and I will do my best ;-) Dougieb 03:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CT Employees

message: CT Legal Solutions, CT Advantage: so many names, so many product lines. The customer might wonder who they are really dealing with. When you drill down through the company's web site, they assert that an entity called 'CT Corporation System' is located at 111 8th Avenue in New York City. You can also come up with various flavors of the CT company name with a Google search.  A company known as 'CT Corporation Systems, Inc.' is said to have rented space at 155 Federal Street in Boston. I don't think companies should be allowed to have infinitely many names in Wikipedia. Since the present article is called 'CT Corporation' that seems to be a usable compromise. EdJohnston 04:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, they are HUGE - like way huge... like unbelievably huge. It is scary. Dougieb 00:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusingly-named company 

message: I think the CT history page is an accruate enough depiction of the company's history. Most of this is commnon knowledge anyway.Dougieb 15:25, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It also needs Wikification and proper Categorization, which I will attempt.  22:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs additional references or sources to facilitate its verification

message: Does the Corporation Trust Corporation have a Redundancy Committee on Redundancy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.198.188.110 (talk) 07:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safire would have loved this
Talk:V for Vendetta

message: I've reversed the removal of the film from the hatnote. While I don't think we need to open a primary topic conversation, given that it's the only other exact match at the dab page, and that it gets four times as many views, it's clearly beneficial to help readers arriving here navigate there.--Yaksar (let's chat) 00:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  hatnote
Talk:Neil David Levin

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Category talk:Former national capitals

message: This category appears to include a number of former capitals of the Confederate States of America, Texas, and Hawaii.  Might it be simpler to re-define the category? PatGallacher 21:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Support the merge with Category:Historical capitals.MadMaxDog 03:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Samsung SGH-D807

message: * Java applications are restricted from accessing the local file system.
** Programs like Moby Explorer won't work for this reason.
* Videos and Photos can not be displayed full screen - which drastically cuts into the viewing area of the, seemingly, large screen. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jelwell (talk • contribs) 20:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Criticisms:
Template talk:US Marine Corps

message: As per this conversation, I have replaced the navbox in the form of an infobox this template used to be with Template:US Marine Corps navbox, and converted this template into a real infobox. I've kept the old template with noinclude tags only for reference. bahamut0013♠♣ 21:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replace & modify

message: So how exactly is VMFA (Fighter-Attack) a fighter and VMFA(AW) (All-Weather Fighter-Attack) Attack? It's a shitty choice to have to delineate them Attack or Fighter for the template, but you might as well be consistent. --Mmx1 (talk) 03:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it's not that cut and dried, because the Hornet is a dual purpose aircraft. However, since we can't but both aircraft under both designations, I made the call. F/A-18Ds and the VMFA(AW) are far more specialized in the ground attack role than single seaters. I see no problem with splitting them between thier semi-"specializations", but I am loathe to lump them both into one designation and leave the other empty or almost empty. If you insist that they must be lumped into the same category, then I'd prefer attack, since the close air support mission of Marine aviation is a higher priority than the air superiority mission (the corps figures the Air Force and the Navy can handle that if we can't do both). bahamut0013♠♣  17:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point --Mmx1 (talk) 22:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: F/A-18

message: ive noticed that the streamers dont include iraq or afganistan streamers. i found a link for the updated streamers. i would add them myself but im not that smart :(  Fail Deadly (talk) 07:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The template only includes unit awards, not campaign streamers. The full list can be found at Flag of the United States Marine Corps. It would not be wise to include all 54, because while a unit citation is a decoration, a campaign streamer is not. Even if the distinction was meaningless, that's still a lot of streamers to have in a little template. bahamut0013wordsdeeds  08:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of Date battle Streamers
Talk:Indianapolis 500 in film and media

message: Deleting an entire section of this article and loosely claiming WP Triva without any discussion, tagging or warrants is entirely outside the spirit of Wiki. The section has been restored. It does not even come close to the warrants of "in popular culture" of being "too long." Doctorindy 20:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Trivia
Talk:Sommore

message: Just want u to know I admire u to the fullest so natural doin a good job out there I find myself thinkin of jokes originally very witty n smart but im to afraid todeliver but would like to share to be distributed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.66.187 (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  writing jokes for comedians/help 
Talk:Moulin Rouge Hotel

message: The second paragraph of the "operations" section often uses the present or future tense, rather than the past tense.  It is as though the words were copied from a source written at the time of the Moulin Rouge hotel's opening.  The paragraph must either be revised to be in the past tense, or the sentences must be moved to a quote box and their source cited. ...follow the trail (talk) 20:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  future tense, second paragraph of operations section 
Wikipedia talk:WikipediaWeekly/Episode8

message: It's only trivia, but the podcast mentioned that the Esperanza MfD had a shortcut to it (WP:MFD/EA), and it was suggested that this might have been the first MfD to have its own shortcut.  However, Special:Prefixindex/WP:MFD notes that there have been at least two MfD shortcuts before:
* WP:MFD/SFD ⇒ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion (January 2006)
* WP:MFD/QIF ⇒ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Qif (April 2006)
--Auntie Q 21:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tsitsernakaberd

message: I think it is highly inappropriate to put "victims" and "genocide" in quotation marks and thus indicating that the Armenian Genocide didn't happen, which is proven wrong and believed only by Turkish nationalists. This is why I removed them. Eemmssii (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation Marks
Talk:ATV Offroad Fury 2

message: Do you think that there should be more info on the graphics, it's history, etc, because if the article should be at least C-class, it's going to need more useful info than is provided.
--Tails Prower13 03:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info on ATVs, etc. 

message: Forgive my informal writing of this...im very inexperienced in editting wikipedia.
As of the time of my writing this, the soundtrack lists the My Chemical Romance song you know what they do to guys like us in prison, as part of the soundtrack on the game. it is not part of the soundtrack at all. 
-viceroy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.96.187.218 (talk) 02:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  soundtrack 

message: These Are Listed Slowest To Fastest.
Kawasaki Mojave
Kawasaki Lakota Sport
Honda 250EX
Honda 300EX
Kawasaki KFX700
Yellow/Red Honda 400EX
Blue/Red/Yellow/Green Ravage Talon
Patriot
Duncan Talon
Sparks Talon
K&K Talon
Lonestar Talon
Nac's Talon
CT Racing (400EX)
Trenga Racing (Yamaha Blaster)
Trinity Racing (Yamaha Banshee)
Bombardier (Also Alba Racing)
BlackandOrange Talon (Tuned To Go Fast)
B6000 (Made Up ATV)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay81go (talk • contribs) 02:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ATV'S
Talk:Trash culture

message: I really disagree with this definition.  It fails to encompass the reality and history of trash culture as a multifaceted and nebulous thing.  Dime novels, blaxploitation films, exploitation films, pornography, lesbian pulp fiction, gangsta rap (with its increasingly corporatized image) and a whole lot more.  This seems to presume that trash culture is lower class and that lower class is stupid and ignorant, and that these is the dominant themse of today, without exploring class, cultural, sexual orientation and other oft described "trash" culture phenomena.  If no one puts up discussion in a little bit, Im changing it.
:Agreed, this definition is terrible. It fails to recognise the artistic merits of the b-grade variety, which have a devoted fan subculture. This description is far too derogatory and negative, and needs some NPOV applied. It would be great if you could add some, you seem to have the main points well outlined in your above comment. Really, the 'derogatory term' at the start has to go, as its use is far broader than that. The broad list of by-products of modernism is given no context, no rationale. The lower-upper class elitism is not the defining feature of the culture, though it plays a role. It isn't perpetuated by peer pressure and the mass media in some giant conspiracy, in fact this entire article needs a rewrite.Nazlfrag 04:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Talk:Virginia Oldoini, Countess of Castiglione

message: Bold text== Removed ==
"In the last years of her life she lived in an apartment on the Place Vendôme, where she had the rooms decorated in funereal black, the blinds kept drawn, and mirrors banished -- apparently so she would not have to confront her advancing age and loss of beauty." 
(Not by me) Presumably as unsourced? IF anyone has a source, please do the necessary. Rich Farmbrough, 21:43 8  December 2006 (GMT).
:Source of "blinds kept drawn, and mirrors banished -- apparently so she would not have to confront her advancing age and loss of beauty." => 
:Further to an long article (4 pages) in "Historia nb 656 (August 2001) " (French serious historical magazine) on the Countess de Castiglione I read, I wrote the french article on fr:Wikipédia and indeed, I found also those kind of details :
:-blinds kept drawn 
:-mirrors banished
:-she did not want to confront her advancing age and loss of beauty.
:In the same way, they said inside the article from "Historia nb 656 ", that she never went out (from 1880s to her death) during the sunrise period in order to be quite sure to walk alone in the darkness of the night and not to confront people's stare.
:Nevertheless, they did not speak about the "rooms decorated in funereal black"
Information needed
I would be very intrested to know if anyone has any facts about her son, his age at death and like wise her husband and the names of her other lovers. the wereabouts of her homes in passy and any information on her jewals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.151.236 (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sincerily Paris75000 23:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The last link in the page :
Five Countess de Castiglione photos can be found here
is dead, please suppress or correct. Ptyxs (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link
Talk:Korhogo

message: More on precolonial history would be helpful, including the connection with the Kénédougou Kingdom. --A12n 21:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bishopric of Courland

message: This article is an excellent candidate for at least start class assessment, but it needs in-line references really bad. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 22:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:St. Thomas Memorial Cemetery

message: The link should point to http://nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/nv/Clark/state2.html. Don't have time right now to figure out how to correct the template. Will try to this within the next few days. NameIsRon (talk) 16:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Figured it out, corrected the link. NameIsRon (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRHP link corrected
Talk:Hoss Cartwright

message: I've never seen any episodes of the last season, 'cause they're hardly ever rerun but I had always heard that Hoss merely disappeared without explanation after Dan Blocker died and Hoss was never specifically mentioned as having been killed. --Harlequin212121 21:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is stated in the synopsis for "Forever", the season 14 premier.  This episode was originally written for Hoss, but Dan Blocker passed away.  Anyway, in dialogue between Ben and Little Joe, they both express their sadness in the fact that Hoss is gone forever (thus the title), killed in a gun battle.     ~Babygator23~ 00:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoss's "Death"

message: In addition to the other explanations offered for it, Hoss was also the maiden name of the character's mother, Inger Hoss Cartwright, who died in childbirth.  Ken Burch  4:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins of the nickname "Hoss"
Talk:Kingdom of Livonia

message: This "kingdom" was a puppet government created by Ivan the Terrible for Magnus, during Livonian war.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.110.66 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desinforming 

message: The best gag about this fake infobox, the one I removed was probably that the flag of city Pärnu dating from 1934 was used for the virtual state declared in the 16th century.--Termer (talk) 11:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Client state or not, but why here is not info-box? 
Merry Christmas!
--Kidsunited (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

text: You can correct it, you can write there "Client Kingdom of the Muscovian Tsardom" (not Russia!). And the flag is correct - it was given to Pärnu by Magnus ca 1575.--62.65.217.97 (talk) 13:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

text: It would appear that Magnus gave Parnu the flag of his kingdom. Rcduggan (talk) 00:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fake infobox

message: I've taken the liberty to translate the Latvian Wikipedia article regarding the so-called "Kingdom of Livonia," following, with apologies for any errant mistransliterations of names:
:The Livonian Kingdom was a monarchy declared during the Livonian war.
:Russian tsar Ivan the Terrible together with his German advisors Johann Taube and Elert Kruse plotted to create an independent Livonian state which would be a Russian protectorate. In 1569, Taube and Kruse initiated contacts with Danish prince Magnus. Ivan the Terrible's offer was to transform the entire Livonian confederation territory into a vassal state of Russia, over which Magnus would then rule. Future territories captured by Russia would also be incorporated. Magnus accepted the proposal and on June 10, 1570, he arrived in Moscow. In August, following the completion of talks, Magnus was crowned [in Moscow] as the King of Livonia and married Ivan the Terrible's relative [niece] Euphemia Vladimirovna, into whose dowry the tsar pledge to gift five barrels of gold. The Livonian Kingdom promised freedom of religion, the continuation of prior rights and privileges, and trade with Russia free of all taxes and levies.
:Magnus also received 20,000 Russian soldiers under his command, with whom he set of to conquer his kingdom. As his first military objective, Magnus chose Reval (Tallinn), under Swedish control at the time. Ivan the Terrible's plan, by crowning a Danish prince as the Livonian monarch, was to engender support [in the war] from the Danish king, Magnus' brother, Frederick II. However, this plan could not come to fruition, and at the end of 1571, Magnus, having failed in his quest [for a kingdom], was forced to abandon his siege of Tallinn.
So, "declared" as plotted? Yes. Established and existed? Oh so absolutely and completely not. —PētersV (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. Found a reference here. —PētersV (talk) 16:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitely a hoax
Talk:British Racing Drivers' Club

message: I have given this article a rewrite and expansion, but have left its stub status intact at this time. If you consider this to no longer apply, please remove it. It might benefit from some more specific information about some of the drivers that have had BRDC financial backing - Antony Davidson was one of them, I think. Adrian M. H. 23:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As there were no objections, I have removed this article's stub status. Adrian M. H. 15:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of this article's stub status