lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:In Concert (Amy Grant album)

message: The album's name is In Concert, not Amy Grant In Concert. This is confirmed on the official Amy Grant website discography, the discography in Amy Grant's book, and on major retailer listings. I am not sure how to change an article name, however. Maybe someone else who knows can attend to the matter.  Ieditwiki (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Album name
Talk:Babu Chiri Sherpa

message: Added the detail about Ambhu Labtsa & Mera. I was Babu's first trekking customer in -85 and did those climbs with him. Arkienkeli
*I removed a few sentences due to (1) no source provided for the claim that Babu's record was "without oxygen", and no source provided for how it is still the "current" record.  Both are in fact false.  All articles I've read indicate he used supplemental oxygen.  I removed the sentence on Pemba because of a lack of citation since 2010 (the citation tag has been there since 2010).Mountainspeak (talk) 07:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Babu Chiri Sherpa 31.167.147.113 (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babu Chiri Sherpa
Talk:Orwell Bridge

message: My daily use of this bridge does not draw the same conclusion regarding road safety, and think that some actual statistics would be useful to illustrate, particularly in relation to the rest of the UK trunk road network.
Edited it to reflect the facts (The Highways Agency don't regard this to be a high accident area) Ratarsed 12:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Not sure how to work it into the article, and I've only the one source so far ( http://www.ipswichadvertiser.co.uk/content/ipswich/default/story.aspx?brand=ADVOnline&category=IpswichNews&tBrand=ADVOnline&tCategory=IpswichNews&itemid=IPED15%20Feb%202007%2014%3A56%3A13%3A547 ) but I've heard there are plans to introduce tolls over the bridge. -- Ratarsed 13:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans for Tolls
Talk:Demolition (Judas Priest album)

message: Are you sure this is heavy metal? I mean, of course Judas Priest is a heavy metal band, but... It's not like their early work, or black sabbath, or iron maiden, it's different...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.249.67 (talk) 04:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Australian bonus tracks are not 14-16, but they are placed on bonus disc.
If they were on the same disc, the length would exceed 80 minutes.
SF 83.13.239.255 (talk) 17:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian bonus tracks. 
Talk:Jugulator

message: "The Jugulator is about a being, part machine, part demon, designed to kill all the left over humans who were not saved by the rapture by the Painkiller. The painkiller (previous album) was structured as a fictional character who set out to save the people who listened to metal. This is the continuation, which is further continued in their album after Demolition, Angel of Retribution."
I have no idea where that is from so I removed it. If someone wants to rephrase it so it cites its source "Tipton said in an interview with so and so that..." so it doesn't just sound like fanfiction then please do. 86.130.146.221 23:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You guys this is ridiculous! You even mentioned in this article that this album has thrash symptoms, so give me a break, the genre is clearly not Heavy Metal or NWOBHM, with these low-pitched tunes, speedy and hard drum playing and rough singing... which by the way it reminds me that he uses a lot of low-pitched screams which is popular in thrash metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.249.67 (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: I went to reformat the citations on the page since there was a bare link banner thing at the top of the page. When I visited the LastFM page that was cited, it was nothing more than content from this page. Therefore, I removed that citation, because leaving it would basically mean that this page is citing itself.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: LastFM
Talk:Yoshioka-Kaitei Station

message: ++Lar: t/c 19:22, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Why the need for the "-eki"? 駅 already means eki. 91.89.7.28 07:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:William, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg

message: We don't turn all the names to English. Just the ones where the name is not in wide use. But for "Wilhelm" you can see Wilhelm I of Germany and Wilhelm II of Germany. User:Dimadick
:Wrong. Sometimes ruler names from the most recent century are left in their native firmat, but certainly not medieval ones. Maed 12:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus. Kimchi.sg 07:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Support. As nominator. Maed 12:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poll

message: Because of his connection with Anne of Cleves, this individual is usually known as William in English publications. Olessi 06:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  William 

message: This article needs to discuss William's religious affiliations. The Anne of Cleves article calls him a "strict Lutheran" but something more specific would be helpful. I'll put his religion in the infobox. StAnselm (talk) 07:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion?
Talk:British Journal of Sexual Medicine

message: This page was created by User:Haywardmedical, who is presumably part of the pharmaceutical PR firm mentioned in the article, and the article clearly had a promotional tone.  However, a quick check shows it was indexed in Medline up until 1985, and still looks reasonably a reputable source for some things, so I've retained it.  --Cedderstk 11:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Artillery tractor

message: Eventually, this could be a gateway page to a separate sub-article on tank chassis, another on unarmored half-tracks, etc.Wikist 12:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well i don't think so.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.196.112.65 (talk) 09:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, the topic is specific enough to be treated in a single article. Regards, DPdH (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: This article omits a list of Soviet artillery tractors, despite featuring a photo of one in the beginning of the article.
:There are some Soviet vehicles listed, however this is not a "list" article. Regards, DPdH (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet tractors? 

message: Is this an article on a certain topic, or a list with some text added? Can someone please clarify? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No response in 4 years... so I assume that this is an article about the topic, not just a "list article"; and I've been working on improving it based on that assumption. I think that a separate "List of artillery tractors" would be useful, as there are way more of these vehicles than those listed here; I'm working on that list at this moment which would have table format. Regards, DPdH (talk) 00:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article scope?
Talk:Worshipful Company of Drapers

message: :Category:Great Twelve City Livery Companies is itself a category within :Category:Livery companies. — Robert Greer (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Livery companies]] ''vs.'' [[:Category:Great Twelve City Livery Companies]] 

message: It would be nice to know the significance of the word Mystery in the formal guild name.
Dave (talk) 19:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery
Talk:Naghmet Hob

message: I'm very concerned about the chart information added to this article; firstly because they are unsourced and I'm not able to verify the information easily. Citations are generally required for chart positions. Also, I'm not sure if these are appropriate charts to be adding? They appear to be mostly single-vendor charts, which are generally not acceptable (see Wikipedia:Record charts). Please can you provide citations for your entries and a justification as to why they are appropriate. Many thanks,  --MegaSloth (talk) 00:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  chart placings
Talk:Anatomical terms of motion

message: Could the difference between inversion/eversion and pronation/supination of the foot please be clarified?  As far as I can tell, the definitions given in the article are synonymous with each other:
:Pronation of the foot refers to turning of the sole outwards, so that weight is borne on the medial part of the foot.
:Eversion is the movement of the sole of the foot away from the median plane.
A similar request was made in #Ankle distinction emphasis needed, but was not discussed or addressed.
109.65.57.127 (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify the distinction between inversion/eversion and pronation/supination of the foot 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gross movement. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gross movement" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I believe it is more precise to list anatomical terms of motions in terms of the motions of the joints, not the body parts.   Furthermore, the motion is references from the anatomical position.  There is no mention of either of these in this article.
I teach anatomy, and students get very confused if these two points are not specified.  Is it worth rewriting this to clarify?  As it stands, I can't refer to this article for my course.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick Ams (talk • contribs) 11:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  motions of joints, not body parts 

message: It essentially contained a brief list of the topics contained here, but not in a way that justified an explicit list article. Hence the blank and redirect. N7fty (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Physiological movement" now redirects here. 

message: The redirect Flexes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Flexes]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Template talk:Disambiguation

message: There’s a few on :Category:Disambiguation message boxes that aren’t included in the table. Frostly (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More specific message boxes 

message: Description of suggested change: More specific rcat on 
Diff:
 jlwoodwa (talk) 21:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: please take a look at the documentation for the  rcat template, and you will find that it is used on mainspace redirects only.  is used for plurals, abbreviations and other similar types of redirects in namespaces other than mainspace. Thank you for your edits! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 02:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 2 July 2023 

message: ترجمه به فارسی 5.209.2.88 (talk) 02:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't have a Persian language (Farsi) translation of this page, but there is a whole Wikipedia at fa:صفحهٔ_اصلی. Certes (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  فارسی 

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Request for comment. older ≠ wiser 16:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC 

message: Seeing as :Category:Lists of Interstate Highways sharing the same title was deleted last year, should the documentation be updated to merge that part with :Category:Road disambiguation pages which it was merged with? QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate Highways deletion
Talk:Ivailo Marinov

message: The following is a list of some of the names and spellings he has been referred to as in the Western world:
* Ivaylo Marinov - Bulgarian Olympic Committee (also uses Ivailo)
* Ismail Mustafov - Olympic.org '80 Olympics
* Ivailo Marinov Khristov - Olympic.org '88 Olympics
* Ismail Mustafow - European Amateur Boxing 1981, 1983
* Iwajło Marinow - European Amateur Boxing 1989, 1991
* Ismail Hjuseinov - ESPN '80 Olympics
* Ivailo Hristov -  ESPN '88 Olympics
I made Marinov the main article as it is part of the name that won the '88 Gold Medal and the Khristov portion seems to have been dropped since then. The Bulgarian press only seems to use Marinov.
⇔  EntChickie 12:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names and spellings
Talk:Churchmanship

message: The "dry" in high and dry coming from the lack of consumption of alcohol?  Uh?  I thought it was dry, emotionless services, in contrast to the emotionalism of evangelicalism and Methodism.  Anyone got a reference for that?  Gerry Lynch 12:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: High and Dry?

message: My understanding of the "Broad Church" was less that it represents a middle ground between High and Low, than that it emphasizes common liturgical practices over contested liturgical details.  In practice, this often means something in between High and Low Church, but it's arrived at by a different route.  Is there a better way to word this in the article? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broad Church 

message: I question whether the Anglican Field Guide is of sufficient quality to merit inclusion - it seems to be from a private web site and these are not necessarily reliable sources. --Jpacobb (talk) 02:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link 

message: There seems to be a missing word in the quotation from Cyril Garbett: '...where there was true reverence and devotion I never felt any [what?] in worshipping and preaching...'. Perhaps someone who has access to the cited source could fill in the gap. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected: thanks for spotting it! Jpacobb (talk) 23:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing word
Talk:Flag-Smasher

message: Does it really need the {update} thing, since it's already got the {Marvel-Comics-stub} tag? Dr Archeville 12:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove update tag 

message: Although Anti-nationalism is an important anarchist principal, this article doesn't explain how Flag-Smasher is specifically an anarchist.  In fact, it explains how at one point he comes to be the ruler of a fictional nation.  If this isn't properly explained, this article should be removed from the Fictional Anarchist category. Cast 12:46, 9 December 2006
:I can recall his Marvel Universe entry describing him as an anarchist, but I can see how ruling a nation would conflict with that concept. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 01:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Anarchist? 

message: According to adherents.com, Flag-Smasher is a member of the Baha'i religion. Was this really in the comics somewhere? I suppose someone was thinking of that religion's belief in world unity / a one-world government. However, it is doubtful whether the religion would approve of his smashing activities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.167.168.228 (talk) 10:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it is doubtful that Flag-Smasher would approve of his own activities; he is consistently written in a remarkably self-contradictory way. Too bad, actually, since the concept itself is simply fascinating. Luis Dantas (talk) 06:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is FS a Baha'i?

message: Didn't random law enforcement officers also help (slightly) defeated the 'Civil War' Flag-Smasher? If they helped, they helped. Lots42 (talk) 08:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I don't think this Flag-Smasher intentionally caused a ruckus in the Farmer's Market...I think he just wanted to walk around and when hassled by the cops, went ape-doody. I don't think  the Market was a target. Lots42 (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cops on patrol
Talk:Operation Bulldog Mammoth

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Kibir'el Hob

message: I removed the following from the reviews:
*Mazika  - http://www.mazika.com/en/najwakaram.aspx
As there was no indication as to the review's standpoint (positive / negative etc) and the link was broken when I attempted to check for myself.
Nikthestoned 14:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed review
Category talk:Upcoming television series

message: I've noticed that even though a page uses the DEFAULTSORT template, the sort order is ignored in this category.  So shows like "The List" are filed under "T".  Does anybody know how to fix that? SnappingTurtle 19:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DEFAULTSORT 

message: Could somebody get rid of The All Ireland Talent Show? It's over now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.172.93 (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The All Ireland Talent Show
Talk:Charles Palliser

message: In the "foreword" (which is included at the end of the book for reasons which are made clear), Palliser explicitly states that the narrator is extremely unreliable, going so far as to suggest that anyone reading the book who had not noticed this should reread it in its entirety.  This would suggest that, rather than "a small aspect" of the book the unreliability of narrators is in fact its main subject matter. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 12:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Register (phonology)

message: Procedural listing: On 26 November, 2016, an anonymous user placed  templates on Register (phonology) and Register complex. The user left no edit summary on either edit, and did not begin a discussion. I've directed the "Discuss" links in both templates to this section to prevent separate discussions arising. Cnilep (talk) 07:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Hackney pony

message: This page needs a picture of the conformation of this breed that goes above the characteristics/nicknames/origin box. (71.171.173.170 (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When there is a good one, we shall add it.  Montanabw(talk) 04:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

text: We actually have some decent photos here, I didn't realize that the tag was still on.  But improvements are always welcome, and I fear that those images of Free Willy look awfully professional and thus may have copyright issues down the road...  Montanabw(talk) 04:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason the tag was still there was that while we have lots of action photos of Hackneys being driven, we have no still shots at all, let alone any good ones. I've readded the tag with a more specific rationale. Dana boomer (talk) 04:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that works.  I just am leery of having 16 blurry photos of grazing ponies uploaded!  LOL! Montanabw(talk) 04:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but we've got over 50 breed articles with this tag on them, and no-one seems to be in a big hurry to upload pictures of any of the breeds, so I don't think it's more of a danger to articles with the tag as to those without. It's a pretty obscure tag anyway, I think. If bad photos are uploaded we either delete them (bad copyright) or don't use them... Dana boomer (talk) 05:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense.  But where is that list?  I can never find it, it's not in the wikiproject cleanup page...? Montanabw(talk) 05:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All pages tagged with the template go into :Category:Wikipedia requested breed photographs, but this also includes dog and cat articles. I go through it every once in a while to see if there are any that can be removed because of pictures that I or someone else put in the article. Dana boomer (talk) 13:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  Montanabw(talk) 03:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conformation Photograph 

message: It might be a good idea to have a side-view photo up showing the tail & other differences between Hackney & Cobtail Hackney ponies... Same for information on the tail docking: which form is used (cutting hair or flesh/bone), how it came about/history, and any controversy over whichever form is or has been used.  (Mentioning just what I wondered while reading that part of the article.) —Xyzzy☥Avatar (talk) 06:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See tail (horse) and docking (animal) for info on the tail issue.  Have seen no photos of Cobtail Hackneys, and it seems we are talking a style issue, not a separate breed.  Montanabw(talk) 20:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobtail pony info, side-view photo(s)?
Talk:Lost frog

message: Two things in particular about this article, I have just done a clean up of it. There was a problem with POV, so if I deleted any section, it was generally due to this. I do agree to the POV, but it has no place in Wikipedia. If I deleted information which is neccesary (which I probably did, sorry), you should re-add it, just rephrase it to make it less POV. Secondly, I didn't edit the quarantine section, there is some POV there, but I cannot remedy it without spending some time on research. Mostly, I think hygiene protocol should be mentioned. The only one I am aware of is the NSW NPWS Hygeine Protocol, but I am sure the other states would have an equivalent. 
The second thing, was the name of the article. The use of all capitals is only used once in the opening sentence, and is never used again. I think the article should be moved to "Lost frogs" (without the capital on "frogs"). Thanks --liquidGhoul 12:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page to Lost frog and I added a sentence on the Hygiene Protocol, as well as a link to it. I think I could probably expand on it a bit more, but I'm not to sure what else to write. Thanks for the POV clean up.--Tnarg 12345 22:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: My thoughts

message: Is this a problem that should go on the article? I was thinking about what happens if a person hinds a lost frog and just releases it into their neighborhood?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobthe13th (talk • contribs) 20:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the problems Lost frogs cause when they go unnoticed?  

message: The lost frog term is not widely used. It is used mainly in Australia and mentioned in some campaigns. There is already book published where it is use this term to describe frogs which were disappeared and found later (in the same place). 
Requesting to add following statement: So far, the lost frogs term is used only in Australia by animal rights activists.  Ferakp (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lost frog" term 