Talk:Loran-C

message: The LORAN acronym is actually LOng Range Aids to Navigation. —This unsigned comment was added by 147.240.236.9 (talk • contribs).
According to the US Coast Guard's 1992 LORAN Handbook, Chapter 1, "LORAN is an acronym for long-range navigation.". (PD-US-GOV) I would assume, since they are the operator of LORAN in the USA, they would know what it is called. --Dual Freq 23:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym 

message: Article should mention what amount of accuracy can be depended upon. Can you plot your location within, say, 10 meters with a modern LORAN receiver? Tempshill 18:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That might refer to the test in Alaska, where WAAS type corrections were transmitted via LORAN and used as a backup for WAAS, at high latitudes. It doesn't look like it will be implemented, but it offers an interesting use for the system in an area where geosynchronous satellites are low on the horizon. That would mean that regular GPS would be less accurate than GPS + WAAS corrections sent via LORAN. Beyond that, I'm not sure I can help or provide a citation. --Dual Freq 00:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will go into a story here to help explain some contrasts with GPS for accuracy. based on some use with both a GPS and LORAN receiver right beside each other circa 1992 - Just before GPS SA (Selective Availability) was order turned off by President Clinton. I arrive; and an dead on top of my secret dependable fishing hole! Say I hit save on both receivers now. The number(latitude / longitude) of the GPS are probably more accurate! However, say I come back tomorrow and following days. The LORAN receiver will be more reliable bringing me back to the EXACT same spot. Where the GPS receiver take me will vary day to day ! - not an excessive amount, but some. The GPS satellites need/require daily or more frequent updates from their ground controlling stations. Or the Satellites/GPS might be be told to position me off so far if my receiver is not Military grade and properly keyed/cleared. Now to plot the position in the receiver to a map - or share, on better days GPS is the more accurate lat/long. Wfoj2 (talk) 00:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy? 

message: Please find out the height of antenna towers used for LORAN-C transmission. If they are taller than 300 metres respectively 350 metres, than add them please to List of masts and List of world's tallest structures. In both tables, there are already entrances for the station of Port Clarence at Alaska and the former LORAN-C transmitter Hellissandur on Iceland. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.49.85.15 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 16 November 2006
411.48 m is a spurious value to use for a mast height in this article! I mean - it's specified to the nearest centimetre, but you could expect fluctuations in the ambient temperature to change the mast height by something like tens of centimetres over that distance! Indeed, when you look hard at it, you realise that someone just converted 1350ft to metric and used the value straight out of their pocket calculator without thinking! But even the 1350ft value would have been approximate. Assuming a 0.95 velocity factor, then a 1/8λ vertical (which I assume is what these things were) would come out as about 396 m for 90 kHz and 324 m for 110 kHz. I would contend that the masts for LORAN-C would be anywhere in that range of heights - IF (and it's a big 'if') the 1/8 wavelength is of any importance at all. Has anyone actually ever measured one of these things?? Steve Hosgood (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Height of LORAN-C towers

message: Is it possible to use backup antennas, while doing maintenance on the main antenna, without enlarging the error of position? Is it possible to tell the receiver that a backup antenna at another location is being used? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.49.218.196 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 29 November 2006
: No backup transmitting antennas were not used. Each LORAN station was allowed once a year off-air in order to perform any required maintenance. Each station and stations within the chain strived for 100% on-air time. If an issue arose with the tower, then an emergency off-air could be granted only for the time required to make repairs. Each transmitting station had a standby transmitter-amplifier group along with emergency power backup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassiniprobe (talk • contribs) 23:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Backup antennas

message: I have recently defended my Ph.D. dissertation "New Potential of Low-Frequency Radionavigation in the 21st Century". This dissertation gives an in depth discussion of the potential usage of enhanced Loran, or "eLoran", as a backup for GNSS position and time. Among other thins, the dissertation contains detailed analysis of various measurement campaigns (chapter 6), thereby providing insight in the capabilities of modern low-frequency radionavigation.
The dissertation is available online at my website
Wouter Pelgrum 130.161.82.199 17:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dissertation "New Potential of Low-Frequency Radionavigation in the 21st Century"

message: Hyperbolic navigation (LORAN, OMEGA, ...)--84.137.35.212 14:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperbolic navigation 

message: Began improvements to the eLORAN section. There is quite a bit that could be added here:
* I know that there is a good article somewhere showing the failure modes of LORAN and GNSS, and shows how one in strong where the other is weak.
* The FCC was accepting comments on LORAN, and there was a huge list of comments, many well-written from major cooperations. They can be cited for PROS and CONS.
* The eLORAN signal seems to be approaching standardization. Details of how the new signals improve or change LORAN would be good to track down.
* US policy / implementation would be a good compliment to the UK implementation.
Thanks! -- Davandron | Talk 15:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like dual GPS/eLORAN recievers are being developed http://www.roke.co.uk/sensing/milor.html 86.168.232.112 (talk) 09:14, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  eLoran content to incorporate 

message: :Image:Droping Loran Bombs.jpg is captioned "Three Fighter Squadron 161 (VF-161) F-4N Phantom II aircraft from the attack aircraft carrier USS Midway (CVA-41) and three Attack Squadron 86 (VA-86) A-7C Corsair II aircraft from the attack aircraft carrier USS America (CVA-66) drop Loran-guided bombs during a strike mission in March 1973." Maybe someone could expand on that in the article. I'll see what I can do as well. There is a note about tactical Loran-D, for bombers is this the same thing? Were the bombs actually guided by loran or were the aircraft guided to a point by loran then they released unguided bombs similar to Ground Directed Bombing? --Dual Freq (talk) 01:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good find! So, are you thinking this would be an application, or an expansion of a new LORAN-D section? - Davandron | Talk 14:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loran guided bombs? 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. With appropriate citations and references, this article would easily qualify as B class if not higher. --dashiellx (talk) 18:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I assume that the longer range of LORAN compared to GEE was due to the use of longer wavelength signals?
BTW, one of the original GEE scientists from the Telecommunications Research Establishment (TRE) was sent over to work on what became LORAN, R. J. Dippy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.254.27 (talk) 14:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences, RE; GEE

message: It seems to me that the paragraph which singled-out SRD Labs LORAN-A receivers was a pat-on-the-back for the manufacturer, not consistent with the dispassionate view of an encyclopedia. Beyond this, I take exception to the factual basis for the statements in the removed paragraph. I speak as an engineer who helped develop the Digital Marine Electronics Corp. automatic LORAN-A receiver, the Northstar 2000, which was in commerce by the very early 1970s.
Shelnh (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you did the right thing - you could have added some information about the Northstar 2000 and modify the style to be more neutral. Sv1xv (talk) 10:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since the subject matter of the article is LORAN, I did not see that information about a receiver manufacturer was appropriate. If SRD is included, then all receiver manufacturers should logically be included also. I am not in a position to identify all receiver manuacturers and all their products, which is why I do not feel it appropriate to add info on the Northstar 2000. If a new article on LORAN receivers were started, that would be a _great_ place for SRD to place its information. Shelnh (talk) 13:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed SRD Labs paragraph

message: The final paragraph of the "Future of LORAN" section is clearly making a pro-LORAN argument. It uses inline citations, but they are to opinion articles and similar subjective sources. An encyclopedia entry should summarize controversies, not engage in them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.157.102 (talk) 08:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: A new Notice to Mariners appeared on January 20th, 2010 which reads;
"The Loran-C systems in Canada and U.S. work in tandem. Once the U.S. service is discontinued, the Canadian system will not be operational. Consequently, Canada will also decommission its Loran-C system in 2010. The official date for termination in Canada has not been set at this time, although it is expected to take place on or before October 1, 2010."
A full Government of Canada statement can be read at this link:
http://www.notmar.gc.ca/go.php?doc=eng/services/notmar/Loran-C-eng
Radcomtech (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Canadian LORAN announcement 

message: The start of the article has been rewritten into the past tense. I presume this was done because America has decided to discontinue use of LORAN. Later parts of the article imply that other parts of the world are still using LORAN. The 'Future of LORAN' section says that there is a contract to run eLORAN in the UK until 2022. If this is the case - that LORAN is still in full use elsewhere in the world - then the use of the past tense is entirely incorrect (Wikipedia is not an American encyclopaedia). In addition, it would be useful to have a section which shows where in the world it is actually being used; there's a list of transmitters, but many are marked as having been demolished, and so it doesn't give a particularly good view of the current state of things. --82.70.156.254 (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. The first part (tenses in the lead section) is easily fixed. Done. A better view of the current state of affairs awaits work by other editors. Hertz1888 (talk) 13:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I think it still needs more work. I think it needs to directly in first paragraph emphasize that the system is discontinued in the USA. The table listing the LORAN-C transmitters needs work- for all chains / transmitter shut down based on US dis-continuation should state this. Somewhere someone should perhaps add some history- Where was first LORAN like chain established? (wild guess- Great Britain). For the chains still operating - are they wholly funded and operated by the nation where the transmitters are located? Wfoj2 (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenses 

message: A sound of the signal in an AM receiver capable of receiving its frequency
I uploaded a recording in OGG-Vorbis and added the link in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prlwytzkowsky (talk • contribs) 23:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does the signal sound? 

message: In the list of LORAN-C transmitters, it is not obvious which if any are still operating. The article states that the ones in the US were discontinued in 2010, for instance. -- Egil (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which LORAN-C transmitters are currently active? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Loran-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090805064903/http://www.jproc.ca:80/hyperbolic/loran_a.html to http://www.jproc.ca/hyperbolic/LORAN_a.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Loran-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091212021228/http://www.gpsworld.com:80/gnss-system/loran-letter-secretary-napolitano-9124 to http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/LORAN-letter-secretary-napolitano-9124
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091201173931/http://www.nga.mil:80/portal/site/maritime/?epi_menuItemID=c56aa099e2bff9525b2a7fbd3227a759&epi_menuID=35ad5b8aabcefa1a0fc133443927a759&epi_baseMenuID=e106a3b5e50edce1fec24fd73927a759 to http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/maritime/?epi_menuItemID=c56aa099e2bff9525b2a7fbd3227a759&epi_menuID=35ad5b8aabcefa1a0fc133443927a759&epi_baseMenuID=e106a3b5e50edce1fec24fd73927a759
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110210111415/https://www.ports.gov.sa:80/section/full_story.cfm?aid=307 to http://www.ports.gov.sa/section/full_story.cfm?aid=307
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110319051314/https://www.trinityhouse.co.uk:80/media_centre/press_releases/2007/enhancing_safety_protection_marine_environment_glas_award_15-year_eloran_contract_vt_communications.html to http://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/media_centre/press_releases/2007/enhancing_safety_protection_marine_environment_glas_award_15-year_eloran_contract_vt_communications.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304112222/https://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/mariner_info/notice_to_mariners/e/01122015.html to http://www.trinityhouse.co.uk/mariner_info/notice_to_mariners/e/01122015.html
*Added  tag to http://www.loran-europe.eu/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151026043227/http://www.loran.org/Library/2004ICNS2.pdf to http://www.loran.org/library/2004ICNS2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216164659/http://teconcept.de/geo/Stationen.htm to http://teconcept.de/geo/Stationen.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218141403/http://www.cil.ie:80/sh620y.html to http://www.cil.ie/sh620y.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Loran-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140530065238/http://www.loran-history.info/Operation_Tight_Reign/PAVE%20NAIL.pdf to http://www.loran-history.info/Operation_Tight_Reign/PAVE%20NAIL.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.loran.org/ILAArchive/eLoran%20Definition%20Document/eLoran%20Definition%20Document-1.0.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090529024126/http://sidt.gpsworld.com/gpssidt/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=597861 to http://sidt.gpsworld.com/gpssidt/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=597861
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210505/http://www.mer.equipement.gouv.fr/securite/03_navigation/03_signalisation/loran_c/Roth.pdf to http://www.mer.equipement.gouv.fr/securite/03_navigation/03_signalisation/loran_c/Roth.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206022522/http://www.pelgrum.org/radionavigation/ to http://www.pelgrum.org/radionavigation
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090204033023/http://www.loran-history.info/default.asp to http://www.loran-history.info/default.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loran-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100127130311/http://www.loran.org/NewsAndLiterature/TheCaseForLoran/TheCaseForLoran.htm to http://www.loran.org/NewsAndLiterature/TheCaseForLoran/TheCaseForLoran.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: GPS is only linked in its first mention in the LORAN Data Channel (LDC) section, when there are links in preceding sections. Should it be moved?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drone Better (talk • contribs) 15:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent GPS links 

message: "The introduction of civilian satellite navigation in the 1990s led to a rapid drop-off in Loran-C use. Discussions about the future of Loran-C began in the 1990s; several turn-off dates were announced, then cancelled. ... United States legislation introduced later, such as the National Timing Resilience and Security Act of 2017, proposed resurrecting Loran." -- how come there are plans to "resurrect" the system if plans to turn it off were cancelled? 5.18.242.22 (talk) 12:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "several turn-off dates were announced, then cancelled" from the 1990s onward. Eventually US systems were shut off in 2010. It appears that the UK's Anthorn site is the only station still transmitting as of 2023. --Dual Freq (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article makes NO sense