lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parasite Eve (novel)

message: Parasite eve is a two ending game, but Parasite eve 2 not really has 2 endings only show the ending on different levels, i don`t think is really a multi-ending game Zidane tribal 21:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parasite eve 2 ending 

message: I added the boxart of the game Zidane tribal 20:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxart 

message: Having just read the book (English translation) I noticed that the plot summary contained several errors, e.g. Toshiako intends to bring his wife back, the assistant dies, etc.  I started to correct them, but having checked Wikipedia:Plot_summaries it seemed to me it would be better to rewrite it to try and give more of an overview of the main story, and remove some of the unimportant details and scene-by-scene retelling.  I've intentionally left out much of the background for Mariko, her father, the doctor etc. since it didn't seem relevant or I couldn't fit it in. Lessthanideal (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced plot summary 

message: I believe we should merge this article to the Series page. I cant find alot of reception to the novel at all even though novels arent my strength. Does anyone object? Even if proper reception and development were to rise, it still might be a good idea to merge.Lucia Black (talk) 08:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have some information on how popular the novel was in Japan and could try to do some research this weekend if this helps any. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Any additional sources you can share would be very helpful! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Novel?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page Moved   Bingobro (Chat) 09:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Parasite Eve →  – No clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here, the 1998 video game even overwhelms it in page views. . Parasite Eve should be turned to a disambiguation page (novel, video game, film and song as entries). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 July 2020
Talk:California State Route 263

message: According to https://www.interstate-guide.com/business/ir-005/ it actually goes "through the city of Yreka overlaps with California 3 north from Moonlit Oaks Avenue as part of a 3.8 mile route between Exits 773 and 776." Just because it is a "parallel route of Interstate 5 to the west" does not automatically make it so in the eyes of Caltrans. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really part of Business Loop 5?
Talk:Irwin Rose

message: The reference of Irwin Rose's short stop at Washington State University should stay because it was part, albeit small, of his academic career.  It is clearly mentioned in both his Nobel Autobiography and UC Irvine press release. In his autobiography, Irwin says:
:...when I entered Washington State College. Besides, there were no courses given in neurobiology. However, I was strongly influenced by Prof. Herbert Eastlick...
Herbert Eastlick was at WSU.
68.101.121.62 04:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dr. Rose noted that his years at WSC were influential in his path toward a scientific career, especially citing pre-medicine advisor Herbert Eastlick. He remembers Dr. Eastlick as an inspiring teacher who introduced him to the world of research. He also admired Orlin Biddulph of the WSC Department of Botany whose grasp of biochemistry Dr. Rose found impressive.
68.101.121.62 23:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to Washington State University

message: Irwin Rose going to Washington State College - probably best to pipeline it so that it looks like that in the article - is a verifiable fact. I see no reason why it shouldn't be included. It fits in nicely with the article, and also helps to show that he did do something before World War II. --Scott Wilson 08:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:3O|Third opinion]]
Talk:A Taste of Armageddon

message: A lot of the "science" of Star Trek can be explained by hand-waving, to be sure. But in this episode, the attack on the Enterprise by Eminiar VII is "extremely powerful sonic vibrations" -- a "disruptor" -- which of course would not work in the vacuum of space. Is there an article about this sort of error? I see that there are some on other sites, for instance here and here.Wastrel Way (talk) Eric Wastrel Way (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific errors
Talk:Phoenix (Star Trek)

message: Surely it's a bit hyperbolic to suggest that project gemini ushered in an era of peace?  It constituted a massive escalation of the cold-war space-race, and was in no small part intended to test technologies for seperate military projects related to the arms race.
Quadbox (talk) 14:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Project Gemini reference

message: The Star Trek Encyclopedia does say that the Phoenix was made from a Titan V, however, any quick search will show you the large visual differences bewteen the Titan II and V, the II is what was used in the movie, and is referred to as a missile, the V is not a missile, it is a rocket used to boost payloads. It launches from a pad, not a silo as in the movie. It has a similar fuel tank configuration to the space shuttle, 3 instead of 1, rocket engines.
Titan Missile Museum has a great picture at where you can see the actual silo, just like as seen in "First Contact", and Titan Missile Museum#Tours even mentions that this is what was used to fire the Phoenix from in the movie. And to save time, here's a picture of the Titan V too. --Despayre (talk) 04:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titan Missile, type changed from V to II 

message: Unless this article makes an assertion of notability for this fictional ship, this article should redirect to Star Trek: First Contact. I'll drop in such a redirect in a week or so if no support for GNG comes in. --EEMIV (talk) 02:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Andy120290 (talk) 20:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: [finally] carrying out the redirect. --EEMIV (talk) 02:33, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Charlestown Square

message: This article was inappropriately deleted. Here is the previous AFD. Other shopping centre articles are kept, for instance see discussion here. - Randwicked Alex B 04:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

message: There are no references in this new version of the article, and still no indication of notability. Unless reliable third-party references can be provided, per WP:CORP, I recommend deletion.  Please note that there is also a larger discussion about the notability of malls, at Wikipedia talk:Places of local interest. --Elonka 20:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability concerns 
Talk:Enfuvirtide

message: Please check the PubChem link...I DOUBT that it's correct!--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 01:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  Thanks for catching it.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PubChem 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.fuzeon.com/documents/global_PDFs/pi.pdf. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:This Side of Paradise (Star Trek: The Original Series)

message: The "Nathan Butler" who cowrote this script was actually SF writer Jerry Sohl.  The current link goes to the wrong guy.  I don't know how to do redirects.  Can someone fix this so it goes to Sohl's article?  Sir Rhosis 02:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nathan Butler pseudonym
Talk:Mortimer Mouse

message: Anyone thought of merging this with Mickey Mouse?--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)ContributionsContributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 05:00, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would seem like a good idea. Cbrown1023 14:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I've eliminated the statement about Minnie's uncle Mortimer making an appearance, strumming a guitar, in an episode of MICKEY MOUSE CLUBHOUSE. The guitar-strumming character was really the other Mortimer—the rival, AKA Montmorency Rodent, whom we also discuss here and whose CLUBHOUSE appearances are already noted. Ramapith (talk) 02:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minnie's uncle on TV?
Talk:Living Shangri-La

message: The groundbreaking was not in 2005, it was in 2003. I live in Vancouver and it has taken such a bloody long time I've gotten quite impatient...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.231.232 (talk) 03:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groundbreaking 

message: The building was featured in the 2010 film Tron: Legacy in which the headquarters of the fictional company ENCOM International is located. Beforeyouknowit (talk) 08:20, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearances in Popular Culture 

message: Can someone "in the know" please add a section about the phosphorescent tiles covering the building? What are they for? What are they made of? Google is of no help. Morycm (talk) 20:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiles
Talk:Managed service provider

message: Although an MSP can provide MFVN service, Managed Facility Voice Network or MFVN is becoming a service provided by phone and cable companies with specifications similar to Public Switched Telephone Netwrok or PSTN service. What needs to be communicated is that it is a method of VoIP that operates within technical specifications and constraints differently than a do-it-yourself Internet method that uses consumer self install boxes with CODECs and other software aspects that are not under a common control and managed structure.     —Preceding unsigned comment added by New2way (talk • contribs) 17:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MFVN is not MSP

message: This page needs to be fixed. It lacks sourcing, and is constantly vandalized by anonymous and non-anonymous editors with commercial spam. I am very close to doing a AfD, however I know for a fact that this is a notable enough industry term so I won't.
To those of you spamming, please consider that this page is now being closely watched by a numbe rof editors and admins and spam will be dealt with swiftly, so don't even bother.--Cerejota 23:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a spam magnet 

message: I'm moving this "reference" here for discussion. Not sure who published this, it's not clealy used in the article, and it's got impossibly tiny text.
* 
--Busy Stubber (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear "reference" 

message: I think what is being said here is too narrow an explanation for Managed Services Provider.  My company works within "Technical Publications" and provides highly technical services to companies that need to have their technical publications handled, but they don't have the technical expertise inhouse. So to me Managed Service Provider is much more than this page is allowing for.
Agreed, perhaps it would help to create a separate listing for "managed network service provider" -- since this topic has evolved beyond merely managing PCs and LANs David H. Deans (talk) 03:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to expand the article with other uses of the term. See WP:CITE to learn how to cite your sources. Also, please consider getting a username in Wikipedia. See User_talk:199.82.243.73. --Busy Stubber (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Uses of Terminology

message: I work for a MSP, and am willing to work on this article, or maybe do a rewrite, but I need some help on sources/references. Would MSPMentor be a valid reference? They are a blog, but are a very respected one in the industry. They come out with research every year about the top 100 MSP's for example, http://www.mspmentor.net/2009/02/11/the-mspmentor-100-list-heres-where-to-find-it/
If someone could help me with finding some references I would love to work on this article. rob3r (talk) 05:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need some references
Talk:Castle Semple Loch

message: I addid a wikilink to estate but which one is meant.
* Estate (house) may mean the grounds surrounding any very large property, such as a country house or mansion
* Estate (land), in earlier years, the estate may refer to the extent of a large country house and its surrounding tenure.
* Estate (area), (mostly UK), refers to a defined area of housing in a common style
--E-Bod 05:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The definitions seem confused- 'house' and 'land' seem virtually identical, whilst 'area' should probably be redesignated 'housing', which is itself mentioned under 'land'. So a disambiguation link is probably best until these three definitions are sorted out. --Stevouk 14:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estate 
Talk:Sean Nós

message: Here's one perhaps for a music ethnologist. Aside from most sean-nós songs being in Irish, what is the difference between it and the other two types of song? Thanks a million. El Gringo 05:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between Traditional Singing, Ballad singing and Sean-nós 

message: Can anyone provide an example of Sean-nós singing that is accessible or might be familar to a wide audience?
*  Does the version of The Auld Triangle performed by The Dubliners qualify as Sean-nós?
* In the film The Matchmaker, when Janeane Garofalo's character goes to the Aran Isles and the charcter played by Vincent Walsh courts her with an a cappella rendition of On Raglan Road does it qualify as Sean-nós? 
* Is Carrickfergus, as (for example) sung Liam Clancy, characteristic of Sean-nós?
* Are the verses of An Poc Ar Buile characteristic of Sean-nós?
When answering, please indicadte candidly whether you are stating a guess, an educated guess or are speaking with absolute certaintly.  Thanks!
-- House of Scandal 23:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: There appears to be considerable confusion over the definition of sean nos, ballads, and other forms of traditional singing. I think this article should be a bit stricter with including only referenced content from reliable authorities. I'm going to have a go at getting as much quoted material in as I can from the net and a couple of books I have. Any help and corrections would be greatly appreciated. 
--Seamasmac (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting out this debate once and for all
Talk:Observer Effect (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: Too bad one or both didn't drop the name of the other.  It would have been nice continuity if one called the other "Claymare", "Trefayne"... or even "Ayelborne".  Or mentioned reporting in to one of those three. GBC 15:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Organians

message: A huge number of errors were noted in the plot, which has now been completely rewritten. Below are just some of the outright mistakes that were made.
[1] This seems to ensure their race is not discovered, because first contact never occurs with races with the intellectual capacity to combat the virus. 
– This implies that the aliens only contact lower life-forms when in fact the opposite is true: They only contact higher lifeforms.
[2] One of the aliens notes increased intelligence.
- In fact, they stated that humans have not shown a greater intelligence compared to other species. Humans were candidates for first contact because of compassion.
[3] One fully expects the humans to destroy themselves, whereas the other believes that they should inhabit the doctor and the captain to observe the solution to this problem first hand.
- They inhabited the doctor and the science officer to observe the solution first hand, not the captain. The captain was only inhabited when they realised the doctor had discovered the aliens’ existence, and used the captain has a figure of authority.
[4] The alien species moves beyond the physical world, which allows them to exist without host bodies.
– There is no evidence of this and the contrary seems to be true. The aliens seem to need host bodies to communicate with each other. For instance, for talking in privacy, they took up the bodies of Trip and Hoshi who were isolated in decon.
And many more... ICEBreaker (talk) 13:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write

message: Shouldn't a scientific meaning of this word be the page that comes up when "observer effect" is searched. I doubt the star trek version of this term is the most usual; also, the scientific forms are likely to have more sources, meaning more information content; this page is, basically, an episode summary. Phoenix1177 (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Startrek?
Talk:Joseph Pevney

message: Anybody know where the May 18th date of death comes from? It's certainly not in his obituary. --From Andoria with Love (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found a source for his death date from The Times obit.  Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death
Talk:Female circumcision

message: Agree with Johnuniq. Discussion should taken place here as this is the page in question. Have moved the information here:Muffizainu (talk) 14:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The above is based on an assumption that there is a clear and universal definition of each term. That is not correct. Some people think FGM is fine while others think otherwise, and different groups of people use words to mean what they want them to mean. An encyclopedia has to cover the general topic, based on the most reliable sources. Having another article would be a WP:POVFORK. Johnuniq (talk) 09:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: When WHO refer some type with special designation then that should be treated as clear definition when WHO guidelines are treated as Bible for this major issue affecting children worldwide. The term need to be specifically clarified before redirected to general term.
FGM is referred in this article as "Female genital mutilation (FGM), also known as female genital cutting and female circumcision". When there is no 'clear and universal definition of each term', how come  they equated in one go without giving any clarifications.  -Md iet (talk) 10:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting issues
Talk:List of Romanian communists

message: This really serves no purpose, especially since membership -as stated- was virtually mandatory. These people are not "communists", they are merely members of the Romanian Communist Party. Băsescu and Pauker together just doesn't work. Dahn 05:13, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I suspect that, other than the general secretaries of the party, most of these names could use (1) a citation and (2) an explanation (possibly accomplished in some cases by grouping the names) of what was their relation to the Party. - Jmabel | Talk 04:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualify and clarify
Talk:A Private Little War

message: There's a Mugatu in Zoolander, also a white-haired brute. I know Stiller is a Trekkie, but I cannot prove the connection.137.205.183.31 (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mugatu 

message: There's additional information about the development of this episode in the Gene Roddenberry article. Seems like it ought to be copied here. 67.188.1.213 (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information in [[Gene Roddenberry]]
Talk:Jem'Hadar starships

message: This article is cited to a single primary source; it makes no assertion of real-world notability and fails WP:RS, WP:WAF. I have redirected it to the species article page. --EEMIV (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Errand of Mercy

message: The broadcast version has scenes deleted to shorten the running time, so I can't recall if there's an exterior shot of the Enterprise returning with Starfleet.  If there were, it would make sense to show 2-6 Constitution class starships (if one's close enough, it could be shown to be any one of the Constellation (Matt Decker), Intrepid, Lexington (Bob Wesley), Exeter (Ron Tracey), Defiant, Hood, Excalibur or Potempkin.  A few destroyers (perhaps an earlier version of the design of the U.S.S. Reliant) and some battle craft would also be logical parts of the Starfleet force. GBC 15:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Enterprise leaves Organia alone at the end of this episode - although the remaster shows several Klingon ships attacking, the Enterprise was the only Starfleet ship ever shown. They didn't add any others to the remaster which is a let down in my opinion. Cyberia23 20:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remastered episode
Talk:Kazon ship classes

message: I've redirected this article to Kazon. There is no evidence of third-party coverage of this subject, and no citations to third-party sources. --EEMIV (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect