Talk:Complement component 4

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: === Copyright problem removed ===
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/11/2232.full). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Marchino61 (talk) 03:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation: This Article contains Plagiarism 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/11/2232.full). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Marchino61 (talk) 03:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: this  might be useful for the intro or any section--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: intro

message: Page contains too much history and human names in non-history parts. Tone sounds more like presenting findings from each study instead of describing the thing, which very quickly gets hard to read for decades of studies.
"Simple model" in lead is not very simple per Sekar et al. Similarities and differences between C4A/B (literally the first figure of Sekar et al) is not described in the article. --Artoria2e5 🌉 18:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing