lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Professor of Divinity and Biblical Criticism

message: I checked a budget in the Edinburgh Gazette of December 13th, 1861 (here). The chair is mentioned as part of St Mary's College. But there is no indication of a payment from the crown which would have to be indicated as in other chairs. I wonder how this could have been a Regius Chair without royal emoulments. Maybe the author/s would provide the source of their information. Yotwen (talk) 18:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Indication of a Regius Professorship
Talk:Back Home (Chuck Berry album)

message: Some interesting background about the origin of the song and its title here. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tulane University|Tulane]]?
Talk:Women Exploited By Abortion

message: This page needs an expert to help cleanup or clarify this page's point. The title may need to be updated...--Cutesmartguy 05:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about a pro-life organization and its title is the name of that organization. I couldn't find any guideline in Wikipedia:Naming conventions which would apply, specifically, to this case, but I would suggest that we apply WP:MoS#Identity and title this article after whatever name by which the group identifies itself. -Severa  (!!!) 06:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why wouldn't it be titled after whatever the group names itself?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.70.82.164 (talk) 07:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert needed

message: Here's an article in the  NYTimes .  This is where I first heard about WEBA. Darkfrog24 11:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Berwickshire

message: There appears to be a discrepancy between the text which says the area borders England and the image where it clearly doesn't. Kurando | ^_^ 08:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Half of the county does run along the River Tweed which until Berwick is the border between England and Scotland. Benson85 04:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: "the royal burgh (Berwick-upon-Tweed) changed hands in 1482 and has been part of the county of Northumberland, in England, ever since."
- Actually this is wrong. Berwick only formally became part of Northumberland in the 19th century, despite being controlled by England for far longer. In addition, it was originally by treaty between Scotland and England, part of neither (but in reality controlled by England). --MacRusgail 18:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. David Lauder 21:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historically inaccuracy

message: The text states that there are 4 districts, but then lists only 3. Is the number wrong? If not, what is the name of the 4th district? 81.154.181.166 (talk) 14:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same. According to the edit history, this was old vandalism that wasn't reverted completely. I've changed back to three now. //Essin (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of districts
Talk:Professor of Mathematics (Glasgow)

message: Is the title actually Chair of Mathematics, and is there formally one chair with that name (a bit like endowed or named chairs), and other professors of mathematics there  "just" hold personal chairs.  If it is called Chair of Mathematics I think the article should be renamed. One reason is that people from other countries might not understand the significance of the appointment as professor means much less. Perhaps if it had been named thus it would not have been nominated for deletion?Billlion (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chair?
Talk:Forest research (disambiguation)

message: this title is general, not just India
Although this institute has a long history and English as its native tongue, most forested countries have a national forest research institute, so I think this is a general term. 
Thus this article should deal and describe these institutes in general and each national, private or commerial research institute should have a separate title under a category of research institutes and forest research institutes.  
:Category:Research institutes 
:Category:Forest research institutes
Pihka 21:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd disagree with Pihka on that. In my view, this article is correctly named for its subject, though there is clearly the possibility of a new global article on Forestry research. Meanwhile I've added a few stubs to :Category:Forest research institutes and a Forest research (disambiguation) page. Since :Category:Forest research institutes is a sub-category of :Category:Research institutes, I don't think we need to use the higher-level one too. I'll copy this talk to the dab page for reference.--Mereda 08:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with the first comment, and suggest that this article be renamed Forest Research Institute (India). To add to the confusion, Forest research currently directs to a UK govt organization. FYI, there is now also a new List of forest research institutes. DASonnenfeld 13:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from [[Talk:Forest Research Institute]] April 2012
Talk:Unicron

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Talk:Missionaries and cannibals problem

message: You heard it here folks, according to wikipedia, women are cannibals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparkygravity (talk • contribs) 23:29, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Women are cannibals

message: The page is titled "missionaries and cannibals", but much of the content refers to "jealous husbands". I get that they are actually the same puzzle, but it's still confusing for a reader to have the puzzle's name jump in the middle of the page. I think it should be consistent.
Do people agree? If so, which one should it be? Scimonster (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: I removed the following text from the References section:
: "The Missionaries and Cannibals Problem (Opening)" Originally shown as part of an installation for VWVOFFKA's Soundoffka Vol. 2, November 2010, Philadelphia, PA; by Megan Kelley and Christopher Gage. At youtu DOT be FORWARDSLASH_zerbOnj-qU 
It was formatted suspiciously but I don't think it was actually *vandalism* exactly. It's possible that the art installation in question is worth mentioning in the article (but sectioned, described and linked appropriately).
Heavy Joke (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art show 

message: Why does the graphic use black men and white women? What is the purpose of that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.201.38 (talk) 21:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity in graphic 

message: another solution is the first two wives (wife 1 & wife 2) will cross the river, wife 2 return. wife 2 and wife 3 cross the river, wife 3 return. husband 1 and husband 2 cross the river, husband 1 and wife 1 return. husband 1 and husband 3 cross the river, wife 2 return. wife 1 and wife 2 cross the river, wife 2 return. wife 2 and wife 3 cross the river. end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lights Beatlemania (talk • contribs) 11:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative solution 

message: Is it possible to do this riddle with more than three of each? 2601:147:4200:E350:3C33:F10:75C9:BDB0 (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about more than three?
Talk:Human mail

message: I think some suffragettes might've tried to mail themselves to 10 Downing Street as a publicity stunt.  I'll see if I can find the details.  80.41.85.205 08:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I propose either removing the trivia section or at least cutting it down so it's not the majority of the article. Thoughts? Kansan (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose removing "In popular culture" section 

message: I am still new, so please notify me if you see any errors I may have made.  While reading this interesting article I had questions about the years of occurrences and ages of the subjects. I looked this info up and added it since I thought it would be of some benefit. I'm trying to add a reference to the German prison escapee. I see that the orig. ref is intact, but am having a hard time adding mine. If I'm unable to resolve this momentarily - I will do so soon. The ref I want to add is:  http://www.neatorama.com/2008/12/16/prisoner-escapes-jail-by-mailing-himself-out-in-a-box/   Albeit27 (talk) 09:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Dang, still unable to fix ref - will seek help from a kind and experienced editor who help's me out now and then. Albeit27 (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Low and behold - looks ok now :) However, will still seek guidence/review from mentor because there are too many ref's numbered "1". No worries, I'll be back to fix soon!  Albeit27 (talk) 10:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: All is ok now, lol - thanks to my awesome mentor. Cheers all.  Albeit27 (talk) 09:08, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidbits added 

message: esp. in the USA before it was getting illegal in 1913: How many used this service ? If that was practiced in more than hunded cases or so, it should be mentioned in this article. Or is it a hoax? --Scriberius (talk) 21:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That pic seems to have been going viral on social media in the last few days. This site:  quotes the Smithsonian as saying "at least two children were sent by the service". So probably not hundreds, but still worth a mention? HairyDan (talk) 11:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mailing Babies by Parcel Post
Talk:Warren Hern

message: This article reads life an anti-abortion pamphlet. Substantial rewrite required to bring up to standard. --Haruth (talk) 03:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: how is being just one of many doctors notable? 65.0.48.249 (talk) 00:06, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: The article states that there were threats.  Threats of what?  I read the article that was cited.  However, if there were threats, this is one article that states of one, supposed threat.  
What about Hern's statement that man is a "malignant eco-tumor"?  Surely this demonstrates a clear radicalism.  
Late-term abortionists are not looked upon as doing a good service.  Tiller was an example of someone who was about to have his license revoked before he was horribly murdered.
There is another time where he called the pro-life movement, "a terrorist movement" on PBS.
Clearly, this man is no saint and this article should be better balanced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.221.52 (talk) 16:52, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More headings 

message: I have expanded the article, adding Dr. Hern's professional degrees (MD, MPH, PhD), his academic appointments, and a section on violence against him, with references.  I have also added a reference for his volunteer work in Peru. Goblinshark17 (talk) 01:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded article
Talk:Martin Haskell

message: [Lengthy violation of WP:BLP snipped]
Dr Haskell is also mentioned in this unflattering article.
Dr. Haskell also fought with the state of Ohio over how taxpayer money may be spent in financing abortions.
In other words, there are more than a few loose ends that will require some investigation beyond my limited resources before I think anyone should trust the information presented in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JimScott (talk • contribs) 
:If the point of your detective work is to suggest that he is improperly licensed, then I'd say you ought to either a) pursue that particular hobby off Wikipedia in a different venue, or b) find a reliable secondary source which backs your implication. This article and talk page do fall under WP:BLP. You may want to consider the possibility that not all info about this physician is available online, since people tend to do things like post it all on Wikipedia talk pages, and after all high-profile abortion providers often deal with a certain degree of physical intimidation. But that's neither here nor there. MastCell Talk 20:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should We Be Concerned?
Talk:Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church

message: This article is in need of drastical improvement, since it says almost nothing about the history of Ruthenian church and what is says is plain myth. I have never heard of any evidence of St. Cyril and St. Methodius visiting Ruthenia, whose westernmost boundary is located 400 km east of Nitra in Slovakia, the westernmost mentioned missionary area visited by Thessaloniki-born brothers on the referred latitude.
On the other hand, there is no mention of colonization of Carpathians in 15th century, when a large masses of population of Galicia and Volynia have crossed the moutain ranges of Carpathians, bringing with them Eastern Christianity.
The Unia of Uzhhorod, the principal event in the history of the Ruthenian Greek-Catholic Church, is also neglected in the article. Does anybode have any troubles mentioning that the population was primarily Ortodox before the middle 17th century ?
I consider circumstances and aftermath of this event a crucially important for understanding the subject of the article. Because of this I tag the article as factually inaccurate.--Rachotilko 08:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now made a poor attempt to do what Rachotilko could well have done far better himself, by adding to the article the information in his possession and correcting any false information it may contain.  Lima 10:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement

message: I was redirected to this article when I went looking for Ruthenian Rite, and found this article about the churches of that rite, but not too much about the rite itself. (Imagine if I had typed in Ambrosian rite and wound up at Archdiocese of Milan instead.) I don't particularly object to combining these two subjects, but it would be nice to have more info on the liturgy. To what family of rites does the Ruthenian belong to? What is its liturgical language? When was it written? What is the nature and provenance of its Latinisms? What is controversial about its reform?
Thanks for all your efforts. Rwflammang (talk) 15:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rite or Church

message: There is currently an RfC at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Catholic_Church)#RfC:_should_this_page_be_made_a_naming_convention that may be of interest. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk  23:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholic Church naming conventions RfC
Talk:Nymark

message: Technically, if this island is not covered by the special agreement appertaining to Svalbard, then it is not Norwegian territory. However, if the discoverer is, as media reports say, a UK citizen, then he owes allegiance under present UK laws to the Crown, and therefore it can be classed, under this jurisdiction as UK territory. RAYMI.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if the British Isles expanded by adding this new island to the group! It would be the first time it has done so since admiting Rockall in 1955.YourPTR! 11:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Runtime environment

message: Suggested Merge. Please don't. This page is very weak, and could be expanded to dicuss differences in a more meaningful way. Thanks! Ste4k 08:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This shouldn't have redirected to "Runtime", an aritcle which doesn't focus at all on environment.  I'm working on an Operating context article that discuss a similar concept to a Runtime environment or a software environment article, if I can get it to pass deletion perhaps it should go there.  Mathiastck (talk) 23:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alexander Chizhevsky

message: Changed the page from a stub to an article. It needs some better formating. Ray Tomes 09:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, everyone who worked on it! I always thought he died in a camp. Glad that's cleared up! Will keep eyes open for other things to add. CarolMooreDC (talk) 23:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: edits

message: For Reference 8, the wayback link is wrong.  It should be 
https://web.archive.org/web/20131202222127/http://www.techsignal.com/library/BEST_CYCLES.pdf
.
Page 168 of the cited book contains the following text (I quote):
In 1960 I made a thorough investigation of Tchijevsky's work, using sunspot data that were not available to Tchijevsky forty years earlier. I discovered that when the years of maximum sunspot activity were compared with the values of Tchijevsky's Index of Mass Human Excitability, the highs of the sunspot cycles followed the highs of his Index by an average of about one year.
This time lag often occurs when earthly cycles are compared with sunspots. In general, regardless of period, the sunspot cycles
turn after the corresponding earthly cycles they are supposed to create. And you cannot have the cause follow the effect!
Can it be that something is causing both the cycles on the sun and the cycles here on earth-but that the sun takes longer to respond?
So the data suggests human strife causes sun storms.
If your mind is open to psychic phenomena, you'll be interested to know that Edgar Cayce said the following "Edgar Cayce Companion" pg. 289  
https://fliphtml5.com/fmly/inad/basic/301-350 
(long before the 1960 research mentioned above):
Then, what are the sun spots? A natural consequence of that turmoil which the sons of God in the earth reflect upon same. Thus they oft bring confusion to those who become aware of same. 5757-1
The following article on the sun/earth connection includes a different Cayce quote:
https://www.heartmath.org/gci-commentaries/interconnection-between-the-sun-and-the-earth/
174.56.108.198 (talk) 03:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: CYCLES book (ref. 8) 

message: Some excellent references to work from in improving the article. Careful research to make sure they are WP:RS needed: 
Alexander Tchijevsky in google scholar; Alexander Tchijevsky  in books google; Alexander Chizhevsky at books.google. Alexander Chizhevsky at google scholar. Which makes me think we should see which name evokes best references in English and perhaps change it to that. CarolMooreDC (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Article_titles#Foreign_names_and_anglicization makes it clear the more common Anglicization should be used, which as I note above is Tschijevsky. So at some point I'll change name of article.  [Later note: I did a count of Books google and scholar and Chizhevsky is used far more frequently even in English language publications.] CarolMooreDC (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Better refs and spelling of name

message: hoaxes and mistakes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.228.193.11 (talk) 20:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I will remove
File talk:Poland and Lithuania 1387.PNG

message: Legends in the map should be translated into English. Who is able to insert them to the picture?
What are the translations: 
"Krolestwo Polskie e Wielki Ksiestwo Litewskie w 1387" apparently means "the crown lands of Poland and the gand principality/duchy of Lithuania in the year 1387"
"Korona" apparently means "crown lands of kingdom of Poland"
"lenna koronu" what does thi mean precisely? is it something like "additions to the Polish crown lands" or "conquests of kindom of Poland"??
"Litwa" apparently is "Lithuania", whoch coud possibly have a longer legend, such as "lands of grand principality of Lithuanians and Ruthenians"
"tereny zalesne od Litwy" what does this mean precisely? is this something like "conquests to the lands of the grand principality of Lithuania"??
Who is going to do it? Shilkanni 09:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York

message: It's unclear from the article precisely what restrictions were declared constitutional and which unconstitutional. Could someone familiar with the case make appropriate edits? Roscelese (talk) 20:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The fixed zones were not a "secondary" issue - sources indicate that the upholding of the fixed zones was the most important part of the ruling. I'm not sure how to tweak the infobox so that we indicate the unanimous court for part, the 8-1 for part, and the 6-3 for part (it might not even be possible to indicate that with the infobox), but that's a very flimsy and irrelevant justification for removing cited material and inserting inaccuracies. Don't do it again, please. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:20, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

text: We prioritize the interpretation of reliable secondary sources over users' personal interpretation. It's also funny that you're whining about how the opinion isn't linked, since I keep correcting the link and you keep reverting my correction. Your temper tantrum about how the New York Times is biased but your unsourced personal opinion is objective is likewise amusing, but ultimately inappropriate for Wikipedia. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

text: We prioritize the interpretation of reliable secondary sources over users' personal interpretation. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

text: I'll sum up all your comments on this page in one sentence: "The SCOTUS opinion is the only reliable source, except when it says something that makes my political allies look bad." Come back when you feel like editing in compliance with policy. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Let's focus, then. You dismissed the New York Times as a "weak and biased" source, and suggested that only the Supreme Court decision itself was an appropriate source. So I quoted the Court decision, and you dismissed it because... well, I'm not totally clear on your rationale. Because Rehnquist had a tendency toward prolixity, in the opinion of a "close legal friend" of yours? Because you personally think Rehnquist (and the 5 other Justices who signed on to his opinion) was wrong? Maybe you can help me here, since you didn't answer my final question: could you let us know what sort of source would meet your criteria? Right now it feels like the goalposts keep moving. MastCell Talk 04:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 

message: — Assignment last updated by Melanael (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 Hon