lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zhang Ni

message: Isn't '嶷' translated to 'Ni' in pinyin? I was always under the impression this general's name was Zhang Ni, not Zhang Yi; the only reference to Zhang Yi I've found is in the RoTK games, but those games are notoriously bad for poor translations of names to English (Xu Chu being perpetually referenced as Xu Zhu, for example). Redmac54 (talk) 05:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you are right, for 張嶷, the transliteration should be "Zhang Ni".--EkmanLi (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhang Yi vs. Zhang Ni
Talk:1st West Virginia Infantry Regiment (3 Month)

message: Both Virginia and West Virginia units were initially recruited for 3 months or 1 year. When the American Civil War lasted longer than advocates expected, recruitment was for longer terms. The Virginia units don't have separate articles for the 3 month and longer enlistments, neither does the West Virginia Division of Culture http://www.wvculture.org/history/journal_wvh/wvh55-3.html.
Thus, I think these articles should be combined, but have neither the expertise nor time to do so.Jweaver28 (talk) 15:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please combine this article with the 3 year version.
Talk:Shade (novel)

message: I see there is a problem with the wiki title of this novel, I could not find a way to create a new article simply called "Shade" because an homonymous article exists regarding the subject of "shade" i.e. shadow. I have also added "Shade" to the disambiguation page.  for this reason I have titled the page Shade, 2005 despite the fact that that is not its title.  If anybody can advise me on dealing with this difficulty or fix it themselves I should be grateful.
It's probably quite clear from my review that I love this book and I hope that my glowing review isn't removed or neutralised because it seems clear to me that this is amongst those works of literature which are, in some objective sense, brilliant and ought to be more widely read.
Objectivity issues here.  The comments above unintentially corroborate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.56.227.107 (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A. D. Loganathan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition 

message: I am surprised that this article has been on Wikipedia for four years and references or at least no reliable references are backing up any of the information concerning A.D. Loganathan.  Adamdaley (talk) 04:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 
Talk:Alala

message: That's not really encyclopaedic, but I couldn't bring myself to delete it.  Especially as it put me in mind of the Fast Show
"Stuck down a hole... in the fog... Stuck down a hole, in the fog, at night... WITH AN OWL!" Wardog (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It is reputedly the term derived from the horrific sound owls make"
Talk:List of U.S. Open Badminton champions

message: There's something wrong here. The winners of the U.S. Open Badminton Championships and the U.S. National Badminton Championships are the same since 1937 until 1998.. Does anybody know which is the correct list and which one is wrong? MontanNito 17:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong?

message: ::The two lists have now basically been corrected. The full names and the nationalities of a few of the open winners are missing but otherwise the lists should be accurate. Badmintonhist (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected

message: I've just merged women's singles 1956-63;  see history for rationale.  The table is not consistent in this regard though - some repeat winners are merged, others not. 86.4.206.56 (talk) 09:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same winner(s) in successive years
Talk:Testimony (1988 film)

message: I've  the old Quotes section from the article per WP:NOTDIR. If anyone wants them to place in a better place, then here they are:
"A masterpiece...exceptional; an undoubted hit" - The Sunday Times
"The best British film of the year" - Films and Filming
"Exciting and deeply moving piece of cinema" - The Independent
"Testimony is one of those comparatively rare events nowadays – a real piece of cinema. Palmer's prowess as an editor, his knack of juxtaposing image and music – something which has remained his forte since he first caused a stir back in the sixties with Buddhist monks burning to The Beatles – has a field day in Testimony. Most importantly for a movie about a composer, there is always the feeling that Palmer understands the music. For a start, he puts to rest the hoary old cliché that the private Shostakovich is only to be found in his chamber music – try listening to the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Fourteenth symphonies – but he also brings vividly alive musical details (like the composer's use of unison scoring) in colour sequences showing the orchestra, as in the climax of the Fifth ... a truly remarkable film." - Derek Elley 'Films and Filming'
"Shorn of the composer’s youthful iconoclasm or any scenes of happier private life, this is the familiar tale of Shostakovich v Stalin, but told with the individual flair of a born image-maker in black and white scenes tellingly lit and interspersed with flashes of colour (mostly red). Kingsley captures well the composer's ironical tone as well as his nervousness under fire ... As a concentrated dose of pure anguish, it’s compellingly done." - BBC Music Magazine
George8211 / T 12:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Quotes section
Talk:U.S. Open Badminton Championships

message: There's something wrong here. The winners of the U.S. Open Badminton Championships and the U.S. National Badminton Championships are the same since 1937 until 1998.. Does anybody know which is the correct list and which one is wrong? MontanNito 17:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong?
Talk:U.S. National Badminton Championships

message: There's something wrong here. The winners of the U.S. Open Badminton Championships and the U.S. National Badminton Championships are the same since 1937 until 1998.. Does anybody know which is the correct list and which one is wrong? MontanNito 17:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong?

message: ::The two lists for open and closed national champions have now been corrected. I'm a bit unsure of the names and nationalities of a few of the open champions but otherwise the lists should now be accurate. Badmintonhist (talk) 15:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected
Talk:K. V. Krishna Rao

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 
Talk:List of active Russian Navy ships

message: Mangust-class patrol boat says that one was sold to a civilian. Also, that article says that it is also a Coast Guard vessel. In that case it seems, that all of the 61 boats owned by the government - can not be in the Navy. Anyone should perhaps make appropriate changes. Thanks. 89.8.93.212 (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrol boat, Mangust class (down from 62) 

message: Ropucha class landing ship (Project 775) Minsk may have been destroyed on dock at the Sevastopol naval base on 12 September 2023 by a Ukrainian missile strike.
Cosmicaug (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landing ship, Ropucha class, Minsk 

message: Remove Caesar Kunikov (Pennant number 158) from this list as it has been destroyed and is no longer active. References can be seen on its own Wikipedia page. TEirTE (talk) 08:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Just saying the location of the sources is not enough, you need to provide the sources in your edit request. Shadow311 (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2024 

message: Project 865 are Hydrographic survey vessel of the Russian Navy. They are used also as escort vessel of submarines. Most known is Sibiryakov (IMO 8640404). --Shipyard 061 (talk) 11:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Please add class "Project 865"
Talk:Military government

message: The section "End of Military Government" uses examples from before World War II. This means that the text is outdated as the rules/laws for occupation have been greatly affected by post World War II treaties (Geneva IV etc) and the formation of the United Nations and its  institutions. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: End of Military Government

message: Voice concern 2409:4043:4D87:B4EB:0:0:94B:20D (talk) 04:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lon 

message: I would summarized Military occupation, Martial law, Military dictatorship and Military junta under Stratocracy.--Geysirhead (talk) 11:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as the page Military government, is a disambiguation page, linking to the different things that can be and are described as military governments, of which stratocracy is one. Looking at the page though and comparing it to other disambig pages, it needs a bit of tidying. --Cdjp1 (talk) 19:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose, for the reason mentioned by Cdjp1 and I'd agree that the article Military government needs tidying. Shorouq★The★Super★ninja2 (talk) 17:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

text: Oppose as per Cdjp1. 2001:8003:9008:1301:204C:A08C:E4BA:8A29 (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing given the consensus not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stratocracy is military government
Talk:Sakae Ōba

message: I have been informed that the surname of "LTC Kurgis", the Marine commander to whom Capt. Oba surrendered in 1945, may be incorrect. An editor claiming to be his relative stated that the spelling is "Kirgis", and that all the sources have it wrong. Unfortunately, this testimony is inadequate against verification by otherwise reliable sources. The editor's testimony, by itself, constitutes a Primary Source. The editor should become familiar with what constitutes a Reliable Source. - Boneyard90 (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected wiki-link in above comment. - Boneyard90 (talk) 13:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marine Commander Surname 
Talk:German submarine U-81

message: Oppose in the short term, Support in the long term. The WW1 submarine section in the current article needs much expansion, the WW2 submarine needs expansion. Once both have substantial content, then the article can be split as suggested. Mjroots (talk) 10:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the Second World War submarine to its own article, and changed the formatting of this page to a standard disambiguation, per guidelines.  The next step is to fill in the careers of the two First World War submarines in their appropriate articles. Benea (talk) 22:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed split
Talk:Ilsa, the Tigress of Siberia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.canuxploitation.com/review/ilsa.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NortyNort  (Holla) 13:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Like a Boss

message: I modified the structure of the article a bit. Since the song itself and the video that was released for it have differences, I split up the information accordingly. It now addresses the question the other person here had about the vocals on the audio track vs the voice of Rogan in the video. We will be adding a new section soon about the controversy of a lawsuit and also citing some additional information. Feel free to comment if anything else is needed. Bvbudha (talk) 05:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

message: Seriously? Go to their official Youtube channel, they have both versions uploaded. It can't get more reliable than that. --2.245.230.116 (talk) 03:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for censorship 

message: I cannot find a source for this but to listen to both songs side by side Fuck The Law by Dead Prez and Like a Boss. They're obviously very similar beyond question. Both are lists of outrageous things, same verse metric and flow with the callback at the end of the verse. Dead Prez's song was released before Lonely Island so it's a fair assumption to think it was an inspiration for Like a Boss.
I apologise for attempting to edit this into the article and triggering filters. I didn't know how to do it properly. May I phrase my edit differently? Would "It shares similarities in verse flow and thematic attitude with the song Fuck The Law by the group Dead Prez, released in 2003"
I think this is important to make this connection because of the popularity of the song, and the plagiarism controversy, when it's clear that it is more inspired by Dead Prez than Slim Thug yet the former did not approach this belligerently or at all, plus I think they're both very cool songs to know. 
Antoniodlp (talk) 01:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , this seems to be original research. Unless it's written about in a reliable source it's unlikely to warrant inclusion. Glen (talk) 13:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuck the Law by Dead Prez
Talk:Sandeep Khare

message: Sandeep Khare is not a musician but a poet, can be catogorised as Indian poet or Marathi poet  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babban12 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This section is nice one but i think this is not the place for this content! What others feel about it? Should we delete this content? Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catogory
Talk:NASA Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal

message: According to the webpage at Orders and Medals Society of America, over 800 people have received this medal. If this is true, then we should probably eliminate the listing here. Easchiff 18:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of recipients 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/parent BSA

message: == Wording ==
Current: "This user is a parent of a youth in the Boy Scouts of America."
Proposed: "This user has <p1> in the Boy Scouts of America."
Where <p1> can be :
*a son default
*a daughter
*children
--— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  12:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Page Size Extension

message: Which operating systems uses PSE? --RokerHRO (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Windows has done so for some time, at least since XP. In later versions both user and kernel mode memory allocations can request "large pages". Large pages are also used for some key "root" system data structures. Jeh (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it used?
Talk:Chill Factor (film)

message: :Chill Factor (1999 film) → Chill Factor (film) — Remove 1999 from bracket since it's a single-titled film—Preceding unsigned comment added by FrankRizzo2006 (talk • contribs)  05:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The-Numbers lists the production budget at $34 million and Box Office Mojo lists it as $70 million. Maybe the article should list both numbers but I've learned to be very skeptical of Box Office Mojo so I'm happy to leave the more plausible figure from The Numbers.com -- 109.77.248.175 (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget
Talk:Let's Go Mets Go

message: That song was not used in 1986. It was used at the beginning of Mets telecasts in either 1981 or 1982; of this, I am certain. I remember clearly, because I REALLY liked the song. They also played it before the Mets games at Shea Stadium in the same year that it was used as the television theme song. I know for a FACT that the Mets did not use this song in 1986. The entire article, therefore, is completely false "information".
Chocolate egg cream 18:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This poster was totally wrong. Not only was this song used during 1986, its title was used for the '86 championship highlight video, which had the song in its opening. My source for that is the self-same video, which we have a copy of at home. oknazevad (talk) 03:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is totally right
Talk:Akiko Tsuruga

message: Today, I added a couple of references to the article and removed the "BLP" flag.  The article already seemed adequately sourced - especially for such a short "stub" article with no controversial content likely to be challenged - but the added references (e.g. the discography ref) should help as well.  
Pugetbill (talk) 19:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed BLP flag
Talk:Marvel Unlimited

message: :I also think that we need to consider folding this into the Marvel Comics page as a new business venture.  There's not much here and I don't see there being much to add in the future.  joshschr (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that if this were to be merged into anything, it should be merged with Marvel CyberComics. --John Lynch (talk) 01:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Modern paganism in the United States

message: It has absolutely no credibility whatsoever. AnonMoos (talk) 14:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is the ten million number even in this article at all?

message: The demographics section of this page focuses almost exclusively on Wiccans.  Granted, Wicca is the largest and most well known Pagan religion, but I know we can do better.  I'll be doing some research later today in hopes of expanding this section to include non-Wiccans.  
On a side note, I'm rather surprised that Voices from the Pagan Census wasn't mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarriorPrincessDanu (talk • contribs) 16:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Wiccan Demographics 

message: The material on this page seems a bit dated. Anybody want to start revising it with me? FULBERT (talk) 15:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for a revision? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Neopaganism in the United States →  – Consistency with pages such as Modern paganism, Modern paganism in the United Kingdom, Modern paganism in Scandinavia Ingwina (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 December 2022
Talk:Government of Pennsylvania

message: If there are no objections; In the section on Executive Departments, I am going to link "Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry" to the general Department of Labor and Industry page.
Awg1010 (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  L&I 
Talk:Al Bandiero

message: Hi,
:
:I have just tagged the page as being contradictory; and as per guidelines am adding a talk section about the contradiction: the nav bar says born in Queens, the main body Brooklyn. 
:
:Which is correct?
:
:Icarusgeek (talk) 17:49, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queens or Brooklyn? Comment
Talk:Aspetuck, Connecticut

message: Boundary of historic district 
:Hey Polaron, the linked google map which you prepared seems helpful.  I assume you prepared it using the selected coordinates for the HD that are available in the NRIS database, as you have in other cases.  That means it would be a good approximation of the HD boundaries, although not an exact map of the HD (which probably is provided in the NRHP application document).  I wonder if the linked google map could be revised somewhat with language to indicate the source and to characterize the approximation, then I think the linked map could be included as an external link in the article.  That would be a good addition, i think.  Would it be relatively easy to add some language, something like:  "This map shows approximate boundaries of the Aspetuck Historic District.  It is based on selected coordinates for the district provided in the National Register Information System database (http://______)."  I wouldn't want to ask you to go through too much trouble, but it would be nice to get more mileage out of what you've done. :) doncram (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: boundary of historic district