Talk:Doordarshan

message: "Doordarshan has lots of different domain names, but this has the highest Google rank"
Moved the quoted line above (originally a comment on the main Doordarshan page) to this talk page after replacing http://www.ddindia.net/ with http://www.ddindia.com/ which seems to be the real Doordarshan homepage — Preceding unsigned comment added by  203.90.127.102 (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: We need a citation for this text:
 DoorDarshan has also been criticised by some, as state media and hence not completely free. Thanks. ≈ jossi ≈  t • @ 21:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed 

message: The name is "Doordarshan" not "DoorDarshan", I think. deeptrivia (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: hi 2409:4050:DC4:4195:0:0:EACA:F40D (talk) 04:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: ''
 sadly the information on picking up this channel is other countries is pretty weak.
''
I may be only guessing here but passing any personal comment is not exactly upto wikipedia's standards. I hope the "sadly" can be removed:):):(:(:):):(:( — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Abhishekmathur (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unjustified comment 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Doordarshan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061017205609/http://www.passionfortruthtv.com/Mediawatcher.html to http://passionfortruthtv.com/Mediawatcher.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: DD Kisan may not be individually notable. However instead of deletion, merging the content may be a better option ChunnuBhai (talk) 10:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[DD Kisan]] 

message: there is no need to merge doordarshan with dd kisan, it should be noted that DD kisan has became a popular channel and is a subsidiary of doordarshan itself.
Hence i am waiting for an objection from any editor within 72 hours, i will remove the tag of merge from doordarshan.
i welcome any discussion.
Lollitol (talk) 14:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  no need to merge 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/meet-the-nid-student-who-made-the-doordarshan-symbol-soon-to-be-history/story-owFIcYbSZe5OfmWIet7GiO.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Thine Antique Pen (talk) 00:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The article seems to have been written in Indian English, with words like "organisation" appearing in lieu of "organization" and "colour" instead of "color." Additionally, some grammar seems to be off relative to the standard of American English. One specific example of this is "These channels are relayed by all terrestrial transmitters in India" under the Channels section.
Can someone please advise as to what is more appropriate within the scope of this article? Thanks!
Sidhu-jas98 (talk) 23:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Although my response is very late, both should do. Most people will understand the differently spelled words intuitively.SenatorLEVI (talk) 04:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, articles that are connected to a specific English-speaking country should use the varity of English used in that country, whether it is Indian English, Standard British English, American English, Australian English, or some other variety. In this article, there would be no reason to use American English grammar, spelling, or vocabulary. --bonadea contributions talk 17:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  See MOS:ENGVAR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. SenatorLEVI (talk) 03:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Indian English or American English more appropriate for this article?