lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:No Shadow Kick

message: The kick has always been a legend and there are numerous interpretations, twisted again and again by television dramas and wuxia fiction.
There is no actual 'official' no-shadow kick.
We should definitely delete the section saying agent smith did that move in the movie because there is no official no-shadow kick that is to be referenced upon.DanielBne  —Preceding undated comment added 06:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsesne II 

message: *Support In fact I'm going to be bold and redirect this to Shadowless Kick. Simonm223 (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Luis Federico Leloir

message: Hi guys... I translated this article from Spanish, but my Spanish is not really that great, and some of the stuff is probably bizarre. But feel free to add stuff and make lots of changes.Ychennay 03:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the format much better, made a couple of minor tweaks, and added a few English wikilinks, but looks like the overall translation is fine.SriMesh | talk 03:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Do you have references for this? P. D. Cook Talk to me! 21:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This tidbit is referenced in the salsa golf article. I added the reference to this article and requested verification, as the reference is a book I don't have access to. If this fact does indeed fail verification, then by all means remove it from the article. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 15:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamped and Translated 
Talk:Willard Libby

message: All other encyclopaedias seem to point to Loas Angeles as the place where he died. Can someone check this? I don't not want to alter Cambridge without a written (printed) high class source. --DrJunge (talk) 06:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Death 

message: According to , Libby tried to find spontaneous fission in 1939 and found the upper limit of its partial desintegration constant to be 10-22 s-1. --217.21.43.22 (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spontaneous fission
Talk:Rudolph A. Marcus

message: This page's content is copied entirely from the third link, which is copyright the nobel society and rudy himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.205.190 (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Supergroup (physics)

message: This article should explain the claimed generalization of arbitrary groups, not just Lie groups. - 72.58.19.66 09:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explain it!

message: You can not say so. What  perhaps really is meant by this statement is that, a supergroup corresponds to each group in a definite way, and that not every supergroup can be obtained in this way. By the way, this does not logicaly exclude the converse. That is there may still exists some other way by which a group corresponds to each supergroup. Tamokk
I think the statement "every group is a supergroup but not every supergroup is a group" is fair enough. Rigorously speaking, ordinary groups are a full subcategory of supergroups (in a natural way). That is just as true as any other similar statement in mathematics e.g. any group is a semi-group but not vice versa, any field is a ring but not vice versa, etc. Top.Squark 20:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: every group is a supergroup but not every supergroup is a group

message: I do not understand why this article is categorized as physics. Supergroups are a mathematical concept. They have great importance in physics, they originate from physics (like many other mathematical concepts, e.g. calculus, generalized functions, quantum groups etc.) but they are nevertheless an entirely abstract notion, independant of whatever physical model one can try to fit it in. It was perhaps true to classify it as "physics" when it was only invented and no rigorous mathematical definition was available, but not now. Top.Squark 20:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not simply categorize it as Category\:mathematical physics? Jounce (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why physics? 

message: This article states, confusingly, that supergroups are generalizations of groups yet that they also admit smooth functions which implies they are **topological** groups like Lie groups; this is contradictory. Could someone with more expertise than me correct this?
Jounce (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The topology of a supergroup won't be locally Euclidean, so the supergroups are not manifolds. Manifolds are always locally Euclidean. The classical Lie groups are manifolds.  I believe the correct mental picture is to think of the bosonic dimensions as manifolds, and the ferrmionic dimensions as having a product topology on the exterior algebra (so the product topology generates a Borel algebra of cylinder sets). Like any product topology, the sets are clopen. The get derivatives, start with the Berezin integral and go backwards. Derivatives exist to arbitrary order. So you can make things smooth. So, in some technical sense,  I guess you could call it "topological" as long as you understand the topology is not Euclidean, but a weird cross-product of a cantor set and Eucliden space. (where you should think of the topology on the exterior algebra as being Cantor-like if you hold your head sideways, stand on one foot and hop up and down.) Someone should state this in the article. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 07:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory
Talk:John Polanyi

message: This page should be renamed to John Polanyi per WP:COMMONNAME. He doesn't typically use his middle name, as can be seen at his official website. Pburka (talk) 04:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:George Porter

message: This text is identical to http://www.emma.cam.ac.uk/about/famous/index.cfm?id=14 which cites "Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1963-1970, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1972." Shouldn't you do the same?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.54.110  (talk) 11:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Version reverted to is dated 00:37, 28 November 2005 by Timrollpickering. Now we should go through and find all the contributions since then that aren't copyvios, and add them back in. JRawle (Talk) 11:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. JRawle (Talk) 12:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

text: But they claim their biography is taken from the Nobel Lectures publication mentioned above. Are you saying that isn't the case? JRawle (Talk) 01:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text on this page http://www.emma.cam.ac.uk/about/famous/index.cfm?id=14 was taken from Paul Daoust's biography of George Porter here on Wikipedia and should have been (and very soon will be) credited as such.  The citation is specifically for the photograph which, during a redesign of the website, was moved and has clearly become misleading.
My apologies for the confusion we have created and our thanks to Paul for his text, Emmanuel Webmaster. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tac21 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 4 October 2006  (UTC)
:Thanks for the clarification. The removed text can now be merged back in, although care should be taken not to lose contributions made since it was removed. JRawle (Talk) 13:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification from Emmanuel College 

message: he spent time in IC, had a room there. any idea what he was doing? (aside from not undergrad lectures)
found some vague mention in https://www.imperial.ac.uk/chemistry/about/our-history/nobel-prizes/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:6001:4901:3512:53F7:127E:BF63 (talk) 19:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: IC
Talk:Fritz Pregl

message: That he was half Slowenian and born in Slowenia is OK, but the nationality Slowenian is a critical term etnic slowenian OK , but he was born in Austria Hungaria and his home became first State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs and later in 1929 Kingdom of Yugoslavia. I also would think that he had to become Austrian citicen for his position in the University in Graz.--Stone 11:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As far as I can tell, he only used "Fritz" in his publications (you can see it if you squint):
:http://books.google.com/books?id=quUuAQAAIAAJ&q=inauthor:%22Fritz+Pregl%22&dq=inauthor:%22Fritz+Pregl%22&hl=en&ei=O-DbTMygBsaCOrqZlaQJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAA
and signed himself "Fritz":
:http://www.google.si/imgres?imgurl=http://www.aso.zsi.at/uimg/Pregl_naslovnica2.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.aso.zsi.at/sl/publikation/2181.html%3F_lang%3Dsl&usg=__frxSqLlONmUUH8UG24RhprulhIM=&h=570&w=399&sz=95&hl=sl&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=ZI_deZ-4JFkDFM:&tbnh=159&tbnw=114&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522fritz%2Bpregl%2522%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dsl%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D583%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=667&vpy=55&dur=1457&hovh=268&hovw=188&tx=86&ty=125&ei=JuHbTI6yC8qaOpO1wKkJ&oei=JuHbTI6yC8qaOpO1wKkJ&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:4,s:0
and spent his entire adult and professional life in Austria. The festschrift written for him also calls him "Fritz":
:http://books.google.com/books?id=c8PQAAAAMAAJ&q=inauthor:%22Fritz+Pregl%22&dq=inauthor:%22Fritz+Pregl%22&hl=en&ei=O-DbTMygBsaCOrqZlaQJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDYQ6AEwBA
I conclude that "Friderik" is a Slovenian revisionism and should only be mentioned parenthetically unless someone can find evidence that he also used "Friderik" in his personal or professional life. Doremo (talk) 12:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friderik/Fritz 
Talk:Theodore William Richards

message: I've recently made a lot of additions to the Theodore Richards article.  Here are some needs that I don't think I'll have either the time or resources to address.
# More on Richards' family life
# His motivation for particular lines of research
# The Nernst-Richards arguments about the heat theorem 
# More on Richards' long interest in compressibilities
# More details of his measurements atomic masses
# Evaluation of his work by contemporaries as well as present-day scientists
# Honorary degrees
# Service in World War I
Help is welcome! -- Astrochemist (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes and suggestions 
Talk:Hideki Shirakawa

message: — Assignment last updated by Yonderling (talk) 00:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: General Chemistry I
Talk:Jens Christian Skou

message: The DR (Danish broadcaster) source now in the article, , does note state the date of death.
The press relase from Aarhus University, , states it was yesterday (May 28).
DR is in Danish only; the at the univesrity page you can click English at top.
Both sources are from today (May 29).--Nø (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, to the best of my ability.--Nø (talk) 11:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:William Howard Stein

message: Information on William Howard Stein's life seems lacking. Any details about Stein's early or late life? Did Stein marry or have children? It would be nice to find enough information to separate the "Life" and "Career" areas. --Bayerite (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad, I see information about William Howard Stein's wife and children in the side panel. Could this be elaborated on in "Life and Career"? --Bayerite (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Today I am going to add my work on Stein's scientific career and elaborate on his chromatography work more. I will be adding a new section for this information, with the broad category of Science Career, and breaking it down into early work, chromatography, and determination of protein sequences that lead to a Nobel Prize. I'll be reorganizing some information in the article that fit into these categories. Since more information has been added, I will also elaborate on the lead more. --Cmatvc (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to add a section on "Awards and Honors" from the sandbox today, featuring the awards and honors listed in William H. Stein's biography and his memoir written by Stanford Moore. I think it is also appropriate to include Stein's scientific society memberships in this section. --Bayerite (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Changes
Talk:James B. Sumner

message: Thanks to DMacks for today finding quotations in Sumner's Nobel bio-sketch which serve as sources for 3 facts which were questioned today. However it would be better to insert these as in-line sources in the article, so that future readers can find them easily without looking through old edit summaries.  Dirac66 (talk) 02:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't sure how to do that sanely. Best I can see, every factual statement in the Biography and Research sections is potentially questionable (just like every statement anywhere:) and all (with the exception of the  I left) are supported by that same bio-sketch. I did not think it was useful to put the same footnote tag on every sentence in each of two whole sections. What would be a more obvious way of saying "here is a good (not even selfpub'ed!) reference page that gives his bio", if a link labeled "biography" in External links isn't obvious enough? Should that link move to References? Should we really footnote it on each of the cn-tagged sentences I traced? DMacks (talk) 06:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, if the bio-sketch is a general reference for much of the article, I'll just move it from External Links to References. Dirac66 (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations of Nobel bio-sketch
Talk:Koichi Tanaka

message: Just a clarification on Tanaka's academic credentials as the only Nobelist without an advanced degree.  Francis William Aston (Nobel in 1922) did not have any degree.  Although he attended a University, he was forced to withdraw for financial reasons.  His only degrees were honorary doctorates awarded after he had won the Nobel for discovery of stable isotopes.  This information can be found by links posted on the Aston Wiki article.
69.138.36.99 01:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Nobelist w/o an advanced degree! 
Talk:Vincent du Vigneaud

message: The copyright infringement tag is nonsense. There is no copyright on historical fact (The US Supreme Court has decided that already), independent on the wording. The article contains just the bare facts. Kraxler (talk) 03:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The text in the section "Life and work"  is taken word for word from the Nobel Prize Foundation webcite. I am not an expert on American copyright law, but in Sweden this is a clear violation. Can you please specify the exact US Supreme Court decision? Best regards, Ulner (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Angus (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Wondering why the constituency was called "Angus East". Cant believe a constituency of this name would cover the same area as Angus South and North Angus & Mearns. Angus South covered the south of the county of Angus, and North Angus & Mearns covered the north of the county plus the county of Kincardineshire (also known as the Mearns). Laurel Bush 09:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Angus East"?
Talk:Otto Wallach

message: *--Stone 08:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: :
Schon sehr frühzeitig, 1885 und mit größter Sicherheit 1887, vermutete Wallach als gemeinsamen Baustein der Terpene und Polyterpene einschließlich des Kautschucks das Isopren, ...... Analen 227, 277 [1885]. Analen 238, 78 [I 8871.
Will have a look tomorrow!
--Stone (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Isoprene
Talk:All Gas and Gaiters

message: Can it be mentioned that some episodes are Available on old time radio? Jakescows (talk) 19:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio episodes 

message: George Eliot in her 1860 book, The Mill on the Floss used the town of Gainsborough as a setting and called it by the name of St Oggs.(185.181.236.222 (talk) 20:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was Gainsborough, Lincolnshire. Here's a source. The article already mentions a possible connection, but there is no source. There is no known actual saint with the name Ogg. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: St Oggs
Talk:Ballykissangel

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 03:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion 

message: Baile Coisc Aingil does not mean "the town of the fallen angel". It is not particularly grammatical Irish, but it would mean "a town where angels are not allowed".
I think the version shown in the program was "Baile cois Aingil", which would mean "a town near an angel". - Panu Petteri Höglund from the Irish Vicipéid. 84.250.53.202 (talk) 11:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the first episode of Series 4, "All Bar One", a road sign bearing the name of the town is clearly visible, and reads "Baile Coisc Aingil" in the Irish, and "BALLYKISSANGEL" in the English. (In fact, there are several such signs in the opening scenes, one of which fills the frame.)  Not knowing the Irish language, I have no information or comment on the translation of the phrase.  Michael Richters (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Baile Coisc Aingil?

message: I find the new cast tables incredibly bulky and hard to follow. I personally found the older and much simpler table easier to read and comprehend. Any thoughts?4meter4 (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast tables
Talk:Sports in Louisville, Kentucky

message: Someone posted a todo item for the main Louisville article that they "read where a women's football team played at Oldham County High School".  If anyone has information on this, it might make for interesting content for this article. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Female football team in Oldham County?

message: Louisville has won the right to host the 2013 UCI Cyclo-cross World Championships, which will be the first ever Cyclo-cross World Championships out of Europe... maybe worth a mention? (although cyclo-cross is not so popular in USA...) Pelotastalk 13:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclo cross 

message: Should there be a mention of the new arena that is being built downtown?  Or hold off on adding this section until the stadium arena is finished?  biancasimone (talk) 07:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New arena 
Talk:Dora Maar au Chat

message: The history of the painting contradicts itself. It mentions that it was in Dora Maar's possession until her death. The next sentence says the painting was bought in the 1940s by a couple of collectors.
:Removed.  While ya mom did retain many of the portraits that Picasso painted of her until her death, there's no evidence that this particular one was among them and it is directly contradicted by other evidence. Pimlottc 14:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this not a cubist piece?  I'm no art critic, but it seems pretty clearly cubist to me. Pimlottc 17:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cubism {{tl|fact}} 

message: Is there anything being done about posting a picture of the painting? It is rather sadistic to create an article about a great painting and deprive readers of a fuller experience. A.G. Pinkwater 02:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: The luminous Dora Maar au Chat was painted in 1941, at the beginning of the Second World War in France .
By no account can any time in 1941 be considered the beginning of the Second World War in France.  France declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939, at the same time Britain did.  France was invaded in May 1940 and surrendered the next month.  Northern France, including Paris, was occupied by the Germans and used by them to wage naval and air war against Britain.  They were therefore very much at war in 1941, in the hands of their occupiers and bearing the brunt of attacks from the British and the unlawful combatants of the Resistance, whose attempts to destabilize the Germans also destabilized order in occupied France.
Will someone who knows the truth please change that statement?  When was it painted?  In 1941?  In the late summer or autumn of 1939, when the Second World War officially began for France? In the spring of 1940, when the Battle of France was in earnest?  When?
Respectfully, SamBlob (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: When was it painted?
Talk:First News

message: Piers Morgan taking a role in raising the nation's children? The country has gone mad! Bhoeble 22:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Random observation per ''post facto'' headline

message: I'm fairly sure that around the late 80s there was a similar paper called Young Times (not a News International publication) which perhaps we could give as another example of the idea not being original, even in recent history. But I can't find any references to it at first Googling. Does anyone else recall it? Barnabypage 20:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I now remember that it was called Early Times and have discovered that indeed it was edited by Cox! Barnabypage 19:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Young Times 

message: Reads like an advert. More specifically, reads like a Press Release for the publication written by an experienced WKP editor. I'd like to see a more neutral, less smug article, that isn't dancing right on the line of NPOV. External links are relevant, but all promotional. Clever. Tagging as advert. 
Wondering why this talk page has no edit summaries.
Centrepull (talk) 11:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As to Edit summaries: Setting up new sections may not even allow summaries. When there's a title to the new section -- as in all but one I think here -- the title shows up on the Edit history and serves the same purpose. Swliv (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Awful article. Sorry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.86.141 (talk) 10:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

text: This was still a valid concern when I came across the page just today. I believe I’ve resolved it, but what we’re left with is pretty much a stub. We do still need more neutral third-party sources talking about this paper. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 03:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puffery 

message: The dramatic variance between 'circulation' -- around 68,000 in 2013 -- and 'readership' -- over 1 million in 2011 -- asks for further attention and effort. I do recognize 'readership' can include multiple readers per copy, so-called 'hand-on readership'+- but still think 15+ readers per copy is large (though that's a real shaky figure comparing stats from two different years). More work on it anyone? I'll maybe try some time. Swliv (talk) 21:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Readership v. circulation

message: The only reference I can find to anything resembling “Readership Survey, Opinion Matters, 2011” is “First News Readership Survey”, which seems like it would be obviously biased, if that’s the source we’re using here. Does anyone have access to that source? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the cited readership survey?
Talk:Robert F. Engle

message: Is there any particular reason why this article features an elaborate digital composite of SEVEN photographs rather than just a photograph of the subject?  I have no way to tell if this artistic interpretation is at all close to what the man looks like. Alvis 05:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a new high res profile image Chrionexfleckeri1350 (talk) 19:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo