lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coat of arms of Andorra

message: Where's the tincture violation?  --Daniel C. Boyer 20:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yellow on White. Top-Left.
The official link of the government of Andorra say Catalonia, not Aragon for the four bars. The wikipedia is not a primary source, so i have changed the name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.38.67.99 (talk) 18:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Coat of arms of Bulgaria

message: If willing, republics should crown their arms with mural crown, such as Malta or the Second Spanish Republic.
Actually there should be no "should" in Wikipedia. The scope is not to prescribe how things ought to be, but to describe how thy are. --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Should

message: This coat of arms is presented as being 1948 only, but this flag is shown as being 1946-67. And this flag is shown as 1948-67. Something's clearly wrong. Let me get this straight... as far as I can see, this and this should both be 1946-48, then this is therefore correct to be shown as 1948-67. Am I correct? And, if so, perhaps the actual file names for the image files should also be changed so as to avoid confusion??? BigSteve (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1946 & 1948 

message: Anyone have a pic of the 1991 to 1997 emblem? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 23:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1991-1997
Talk:Coat of arms of Cyprus

message: as the modern coat of arms was deleted from the wikimedia commons, could we use it under free use on this page like on the Canadian Coat of Arms page? (also does anyone have the original SVG, it seems to have dropped off the face of the internet. if not I have a PNG from a government website) Thespündragon 21:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: i have uploaded it under fair use Thespündragon 00:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: please cite a source for the blazon which uses "Copper Yellow", source linked in article uses OrThespündragon 13:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

text: I have cited a source for Copper in blazon --Thespündragon 19:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Coat of Arms 

message: We need reliable sources for the following:
Coats of Arms of the Crusader Kingdom of Cyprus
Coat of Arms of the Ottoman Eyalet of Cyprus 
Coats of Arms and Royal Badges of the British Crown Colony of Cyprus 
assistance would be appreciated! Thespündragon 22:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed 

message: The version of the coat of arms created to avoid copyright is mislabelled, as you can see in the screenshot, saying that it was actually used officially from 2006 to 2023, and a new image created recently that indeed fits what has been used by the government is labelled as though the change happened recently (though the font of the date (1960) looks different). 
Now I was just going to delete the second copyright-free image & simply relabel the new accurate image correctly, but I am not sure if the copyright for the correct version has been changed, and if it has not then the new image will have to be removed instead; the source provided by the image's creator doesn't state anything about copyright and I have been unable to find where I can look it up, so if someone could find it out before any of the two images are removed it would be greatly appreciated. 
I am still relabelling the images though, the information given is simply incorrect.  Hutreb (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mislabeling of the Copyright-Free Version as an Officially Used Coat of Arms from 2006 to 2023 & Help with the Copyright Status of the Correct Version 
Talk:Coat of arms of the Province of Karelia

message: The translation of the blazon (from Finnish?) does not mention the red background.  Without this the blazon is incomplete.  A proper blazon would be:
Gules, above two duelling arms, the dexter gauntleted holding a sword and the sinister mailed a scimitar argent hafted or, a crown of the same, in chief a ducal coronet of the same, jeweled on the rim; for a crest a ducal coronet of the same and jeweled on the rim.
I believe the straight sword/curved scimitar refers not just to Karelia's geographic position between Sweden and Russia, but to it's (and Finland's) position as the frontier of Western civilization, defending the "West" against the "East."  In Finnish heraldry, The Finnish Lion, holding a straight sword, is trampling a fallen, curved scimitar.  The symbolism is obvious.  Finland is the last outpost of the West against the hordes of the East.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.253.4.21 (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blazon
Talk:Bermuda Conference

message: If Evian Conference of 32 countries in 1938 to discuss the Jewish refugees, then why does the Bermuda Conference in 1943 readdress the same issue "and before the extent of their persecution was known"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PBHWS (talk • contribs) 
: Maybe to show an effort, maybe not. It is not up to us to make guesses. We should reflect facts and notable views. No need to copy the entire article's content if your question concerns 1 sentence. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 21:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: It is amusing to see a fairly long article about a subject which on 98% of the evaluation and only 4% of historical facts, which may be written in two short words: "It failed".
Nothing at all is written what/how was discussed and what was this resolution which could not have been implemented. 
This is probably one of the most useless historical articles I've ever seen in wikipedia. When reading about an event, first of all I want to see the description of the event, and only then its judgements. 
I edited the text, so that this fundamental flaw will be seen immediately, and I hope some expert will improve it eventually. Mukadderat 20:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:Coat of arms of the Czech Republic

message: hi
Hi. There is a wrong information regarding the Moravian eagle. It was from mid of 13th century till 1915 silver-red. Always although the Germans in Moravia wanted gold. And today some separatists in Moravia wanted it gold again, because the silver is the symbol of the Czech king. Thats probably why you have this nonsense on the page. Have a good one  2.31.161.234 (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid you're mistaken. The golden tincture in the Moravian eagle was granted as an "improvement" to the arms as a reward on the original arms (dated to some time between 1277-1297), in the form of the silver being transformed to gold, by Frederick III as a reward to for assistance in suppressing an uprising in Vienna. The arms were, however, declined by Czech nobility and only "forced" upon them after the battle of the White Mountain. And even after that there are many cases of them still using the silver arms. It was officially reinstituted as silver by the formation of Czechoslovakia. The separatists want the gold because they want to somehow differ from the "Czech" Moravia. Avenflight (talk) 10:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Coat of arms of Belgium

message: This article has been rewritten. In my last update I have added the official engravings of the arms of the Kingdom as published with the Royal Decree of 1837. Due to the media of the time, this engraving was published without colours. Though this is unfortunate, it does have the greater advantage of showing the arms as they were intended. Richardot 14:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Scrapping the coloured versions however is a bad idea. They should be included as well. The older versions have the disadvantage that they don't show the coat of arms as it was intended to be: in color. -- fdewaele, 19:02, 3 November 2007 (CET)
Before we have another round of changing pictures, let me just give three arguments for sticking to the ones I have put in.
1. These are the only official drawings. They may not be to everyone's taste, but they have the merit of being the real stuff rather than a contemporary interpretation. If the wiki-community decides to discard them, the captions should be corrected too!
2. The interpretation that has been used as a substitute for the great arms was done by Roger Harmignies in the 1960s. As always he did a good job. Still, I am not at all sure that it is in the public domain.
3. The arms that have been substituted for the small arms are faulty and not exactly great art work either.Richardot (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I strongly disagree with you. A quick check at the Belgian passport cover, the site of the monarchy or of the government is enough to observe that they adopt a more stylized version of the small coat of arms. In fact, it is a poor modern notion that a coat of arms should be "padronized". Anyway, the "faulty" PNG version used here is more close than the original one defended by you. --Tonyjeff (talk) 03:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have reassessed this article as Start-class. It fails on two of the six B-class criteria: 1) it lacks in-line citations and could do with one or two more references generally; 2) Technical language is not sufficiently wiki-linked to be clear, and it could be altered to make some terms clearer. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 20:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: The coats of arms shown for the Belgian royal family do not match the official designs in the royal decree of 2019, nor the design shown in the website of the Belgian monarchy. Not only is the design of the Leo Belgicus different, but also you can see  that the official shield has an old French or English shape (square with round pin bottom) as opposed to the continental (or "modern French") shape used by Wikipedia. This problem appears systematically in several pages related to Belgium and to the Belgian monarchy. Should it not be fixed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.76.164.205 (talk) 22:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Design of the Coat of Arms
Wikipedia talk:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board/Umlaut and ß

message: A separate issue: when, in the Michelin guide, is says "Meißen - see MEISSEN", is this merely a question of capital letters, there being of course no majuscule form of ß? (Is ß the only Wikipedia article at a title beginning with a lower case letter?) --Stemonitis 08:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true, I shall remove the example at once! Saint|swithin 09:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Michelin Guide

message: A suggested move and related debate about whether to name an article "Meissen" or "Meißen" is ongoing at Talk:Meissen.  Interested editors are invited to participate. --Elonka 00:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And again now; sigh. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related poll

message: Wikipedia:Requests for Comment/Duplicate name in basic ASCII character set In ictu oculi (talk) 23:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention in related RfC 2013
Talk:Coat of arms of Moldova

message: The rose in the SVG is shown slightly tilted. But the rose on page 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova (website of Moldovan president, so at least somewhat official) shows it oriented vertically. JDAWiseman (talk) 17:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orientation of rose 

message: Andora 175.158.37.123 (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dell Man
Talk:Detour (Goldsmith novel)

message: This page is named "Detour (novel)" for disambiguation purposes.  I have added earlier today a page for "Detour (1977 novel)".  I believe this means that this page ought to be renamed "Detour (1939 novel)".Choor monster (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Page rename?
Talk:Coat of arms of Gibraltar

message: The article says, without references, that the coat of arms was has been in use since 1502. It's obviously true if we consider the "Spanish" branch of the coat of arms (that what settled down in San Roque). However, it's highly unlikely (not to say impossible) that the coat of arms were in use (in which terms?) in Gibraltar since 1713. Gibraltar was a simple "garrison" until 1830 (if I don't remember the date badly). The first self-governing institution (the City Council) was not established until 1921. So, who and in which terms used the coat of arms since 1713 to whenever it was recovered? --Ecemaml (talk) 22:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Use
Talk:Coat of arms of Öland

message: I know it can be seen in Oland's mais article. But shouldn't this one, about Oland's Heraldry, displaying other four coats of arms, display Oland's one? --189.24.252.196 (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of Arms 

message: According to  the original 1560 CoA was similar to that used today (the sv.wiki page mentions that there is a text from 1562 with this blazon). At some point between 1569 and 1880 the two roe deer confusion started. /Lokal_Profil 15:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure where the 1884 date comes from, apart from this being the year when the encyclopaedia with the image to the right was released. /Lokal_Profil 15:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  this book from 1905 contains three separate blazons for each province. These are from pre1594, 1597 and 1583-1595. /94.193.242.248 (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that that source already points out that there seems to be some confusion with regards to the blazon. /94.193.242.248 (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Image series and a verbatim blazon from 1885 (p.54 from the above mentioned book).
File:Öland-Åland vapen.svg|Coat of arms designed for Åland but used by Öland until 1944.
File:Åland vapen.svg|Coat of arms designed for Öland but used by Åland.
File:Öland vapen.svg|Coat of arms used by Öland today.
/Lokal_Profil 21:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Coat of arms of the Isle of Man

message: :
George IV maybe?  George III died in 1820 if memory serves; he was certainly king before 1776. —Tamfang (talk) 06:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the cited ref says George IV. I've fix it now. Thanks for leaving a note.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  can't tell your Georges without a scorecard 
Talk:Michael Onslow, 7th Earl of Onslow

message: Deleted account of monkey's escape being reported in UT paper - trivial.Parkwells (talk) 21:24, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete trivia

message: I removed a quote from the Earl of Onslow about the monarchy on the grounds that I couldn't find any independent coverage of this statement, nor can I find any evidence that his position on the monarchy is generally notable.  I could be persuaded to include this, if there is evidence that it is noteworthy, but as it stands, it is a very short quote from a live television interview, and it's impossible to judge how seriously it should be taken.
Him being in favor of the monarchy is not surprising, but the concept that only monarchy makes the governance of humanity possible is a very bold and strong claim, and not one we should casually pin on the man's encyclopedia article without some additional evidence that he holds this exact position.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views on monarchy
Talk:Winthrop House

message: -- Identity mistake -- former Senior Tutor.
The James von der Heydt identified as Senior Tutor of Winthrop House 2003-06 is not the same one with a Wikipedia page as "author."  This sentence should say "James von der Heydt, great-nephew of the author [with Wikipedia page] and federal judge James von der Heydt."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.244.174.66 (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

message: "Stein Clubs" were unknown in River houses of the late 1970s/early 1980s, and therefore I suspect the connexion to Teddy K may be apocryphal.  Documentation needed.
*I certainly never heard of such a thing when I lived in Winthrop House a couple of years in the early 60s.  And being a guy who would drink a brew from time to time, I'm pretty sure I would have heard of it.  I still have, as a matter of fact, a large white beer stein with the Winthrop House emblem on it, plus my nickname....
-In response: The Teddy K connection is apocryphal.  It seems to refer to an article in the Harvard Independent that was an exaggeration of actual house events.  However, Stein Clubs do happen on a weekly basis in Winthrop in recent years, and are very well attended.
**I'm also astonished to see that JFK's apartment is now apparently set aside for VIPs.  It's possible that he lived in more than one during his time there.  To my own knowledge, at least one of them was fairly modest, a small living room, a tiny bedroom with a double-decker bunk, and a bathroom with, at least, a decent tub. I suppose there was a closet somewhere but I forget where.  On November 7, 1960, or whatever the exact date of the election was, I was sitting in the small living room of my apartment on the ground floor at the far end of the building nearest the road and the river; in the fireplace was a small black and white TV belonging to my roommate (Mick Ault), on which I watched the election returns until 3 in the morning, at which point it was still undecided and I went to bed.  The next day, while having lunch at Guten Essen up by the Square, we saw on the TV over the bar that JFK had finally won.  In any case, I was told at the time I moved into that particular apartment that it was the one that JFK had lived in.... Hayford Peirce 03:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward Kennedy and Stein Clubs
Talk:Ruined orgasm

message: "Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."
pfffft
This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be  written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like
http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincspoacher  (talk • contribs) 
:The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Mdwh 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Merged into Erotic sexual denial -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. FT2 (Talk | email) 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge.  Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it.  Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--Taxwoman 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:The Silver Wolf

message: I stumbled over this article a while back, and I didn't have any idea what it was, (Novel?  Folk tale?  Original work?) but I knew SOMETHING needed to be done....  I put it on my watchlist and then promptly forgot all about it.  How delightful to come back and find it's all been fixed and totally makes sense now.  Good job, y'all!  Mutableye 02:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love That Wikipedia!
File talk:Scottgroup.jpg

message: Can anyone tell me why the picture is called Shackletongroup.jpg, if there is no trace of Ernest Shackleton in it? Thanks, --Matijap 21:29, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is obviously misnamed. Is it too late to change the name? I also think the people are (from left to right) Wilson, Evans, Scott, Oates and Bowers. The description inplies it is (from left to right) Wilson, Bowers, Scott, Evans and Oates.Barneygumble 20:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just renamed and re-uploaded the file with a corrected name. Ian Dunster 11:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Holyland (Belfast)

message: I removed:
"The expansion in Queens University student numbers, the inadequate provision of University Accommodation along with dramatic over-development by private landlords, and the attraction of living near the many amenities in South Belfast has drawn students to the Holyland area, a typical university precinct. This has radically transformed the area’s demographic makeup, from that of predominantly working class nationalist family residences to now over 90% student occupation in Houses of Multiple Occupancy (HMOs). Roughly 7,000 students live in this one square kilometre of Belfast. The long-term residential population has dwindled to 400-500 and an increase in anti-social behaviour by a minority of students has intensified friction between the ‘settled’ community and the student population. Overcrowding and poor community infrastructure has exacerbated problems such as violent behaviour, noise, burglary and vehicle crime. In recent times there has been a marked increase in anti-social behaviour from students resulting in an increased number of complaints to both universities. This in turn led to increased media attention on the Holyland area, most notably on the BBCNI Spotlight current affairs television programme, which highlighted the problems of anti-social behaviour. "
As it's copied from this. It could be reworded though. Stu ’Bout ye! 11:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:477374162 beb8556d85.jpg, found on :Holyland (Belfast), has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 23:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Tony Mason (co-driver)

message: I suspect that this comment is rather too like original research to feature, and also I'm not sure it's correct: 
Tony is believed to be the inspiration for an Alan Partridge sketch, shown on satirical comedy The Day Today, in which Steve Coogan's sports reporter character interviews a female rally driver in a patronising manner.
The scene in The Day Today  is more a spoof of a typical newsreader/sports presenter interviewing a rally driver - Alan is frightened by the ride, whereas Tony Mason was an experienced co-driver. Bob talk 00:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected original research
Talk:Scale-space segmentation

message: Is this link/reference, on the application of Gaussian Scale Space in microscopy image segmentation, acceptable for this article (owner, self-promotion?) ? Pvosta 11:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link/Reference suggestion 

message: This article, as it currently stands, needs to be explicated a little bit for the sake of accessibility. ENeville 16:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it could use some work.  I added some figures that might help, but it needs more explanation.  Witkin's fundamental work is cast an aside relative to the more complex 2D work.  It really should be explained first, since without understanding it the rest can't make any sense. Dicklyon 23:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I added a short bit on the 1D case, and some section headings.  Hope it helps.  More work could help more. Dicklyon 05:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layman's terms 

message: Scale space segmentation should probably redirect to this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.247.162.84 (talk) 01:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Pantera discography

message: Have moved Pantera Discography to this new page so as to bring the Pantera Page article size to a more preferrable one.
Will231982 11:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why the first four albums aren't listed on the table? --Mika1h (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the same information that is written in the lead, would only be repeated in the table. Cannibaloki 17:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early albums 