lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Splitting maul

message: The caption of the image stated it was used in combat. The image was taken from this page here. It is a part of an online museum. The particular maul was used at Alcatraz, apparently for driving spikes (as in a railroad, or concrete construction). Not quite combat. The image also lacks proper copyright information. -- Xiliquiern 19:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Combat Maul" Image Removal

message: I believe the entire section on "Combat use" is yet another piece of fiction created by RPG designers. A real war hammer bears almost no resemblance to a maul, and neither resembles the "mental image" of large, either plain or ornate metal or stone blocks, usually longer than they are tall, mounted on a long, two-handed handle in a "T" shape which in fact seems to come from the Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay game and/or the movie Conan the Barbarian. In my reference books I find no reference to such a weapon, which is not surprising since a great lump of stone on a long handle would be totally impractical in combat. -- Securiger 12:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: The argument that one can hit one's feet with the maul even if swinging using an open stance is inapplicable to all but the tallest humans, as the maul + arm length + lean of the body ensures that the head of the maul is more than waist distance away from the body, ensuring that it gets buried in the dirt before it hits the foot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.234.99.10 (talk) 02:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Safety
Talk:Gregor Suslev

message: Not notable outside that book. JASpencer 19:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Noble House]] 

message: Doesn't he show up as an old man, torturing Armstrong, in Whirlwind? Kimera757 13:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whirlwind
Talk:Capitoline Wolf Statue, Cluj-Napoca

message: The new image is more blurred. Can that be fixed? Biruitorul 19:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. This was what my tool could do. If you'd rather revert to the other, or if you can do better, feel free. - Jmabel | Talk 05:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll see what I can do. If need be, we can ask someone from Cluj to take another picture. Biruitorul 05:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I think that we should change the name of the article from Statue of the She-Wolf, Cluj-Napoca to Capitoline Wolf Statue, Cluj-Napoca, as the existing article on the subject of the statue is Capitoline Wolf. -Alexrap 17:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm neutral on the matter, so if you want to move it, I won't object. Biruitorul 00:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just changed the name of the article to the one proposed above and have also fixed the all links the the old page. Alexrap 18:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Capitoline Wolf Statue it's Ok, too. --Roamataa 18:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The name of the article
Talk:Ted Baxter

message: *ABOUT MIDWAY THROUGH "MTM" TEDD BAXTER adutions as a host of a New York City Game Show. Could Ted Knight have been tired of playing Ted Baxter {typecast?}. Ironically the series showed Baxter could actually by a compent TV personality-when he was not a newscaster-when he tried out as a game show host; when he was a talk show host; when he did comericals as "Farmer Ted". (unsigned, undated comment)
::I added some details - Knight did consider leaving, mainly because up to that point Ted Baxter had been made to look like an COMPLETE idiot. They toned it down a bit in seasons after that. NickBurns (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mid-series Crisis?

message: "He gives new meaning to the term incompetence." 12.44.117.10 20:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorialize much?

message: I think we should have Ted's speech about his begining. "It All Started in a 5000-Watt Radio Station in Fresno, California..."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthritix (talk • contribs) 23:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: It all started

message: Bill O'Reilly is labled an infotainer while Olbermann isn't when they do pretty much the same schtick, albeit from different angles? --12.28.101.34 16:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should NPOV extend to the trivia section?

message: bears a resemblance is better phrasing in the absence of evidence of intentional homage - enough people have verifiably remarked on the resemblance, anyway. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brockman
Talk:Stereocenter

message: "chiral center" vs. "chirality center"?  Is there any difference (it seems the two are used interchangeably).  Suggest changing to one or emphasizing the difference (quick google poll would indicate chiral center is more common than chirality center).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzzzort (talk • contribs) 22:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "chiral center" vs. "chirality center"

message: I have reverted definition for chirality center which is fact is a definition for chiral carbon:
A chirality center is a stereocenter, consisting of an atom with four different entities, giving rise to two enantiomers. 
V8rik (talk) 18:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong definition chirality center

message: Stereogenic redirects here. See IUPAC definition of stereogenic unit   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.163.188 (talk) 13:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition needs clarification for stereogenic unit! 

message: As Mislow and Siegel (1984, cited) say, stereogenic and chiral have nothing to do with each other, and the two things should be separated (you cannot define one in term of the other!).  
The definition of stereogenic center (axis, plane) is correct as stated.  Definition of chiral is Lord Kelvin's (mirror image not superimposable) and it's a property of the object as a whole.  Chiral center or chirality center are oxymorons. IUPAC has not come to terms with this in the past 30 years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.48.112 (talk) 06:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereogencity and chirotopicity 

message: — Assignment last updated by ChemistryCatSaysStop (talk) 20:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors Organic Chemistry I
Talk:Lord Randall

message: Belongs in Wikisource.  A synopsis, no more, is suitable here.  Goldfritha 19:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Full text
Talk:New York State Route 326

message: This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 21:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Intersection Template 

message: I've removed the Oakwood NY link as it directed people to the wrong place (there are two Oakwoods, the one referred to in this article is an unincorperated hamlet). 24.105.183.2 (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Link
Talk:Selhurst railway station

message: An anon user (195.93.21.136) indicated on 18 August 2006 that there's a new route to London Bridge, trying to amend the succession box to reflect this. I travel through there quite a bit and haven't noticed any new bridges or whatever but I could be wrong. Anyone know about this (and if so, provide references)? --A bit iffy 19:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anon user is a little confused. It is possible to go from Selhurst station on the Victoria slow lines to Norwood Jn station on the London Bridge lines by use of Selhurst depot Arrival or Departure lines but (i) it's a very old route & (ii) it's for Empty Coaching Stock/emergencies only, so no passenger service could be booked through there. Hence it doesn't qualify for the succession box. As always Quail Maps are your friend - see Map Book #5 page 14, box C for details. Fu Manchuchu (talk) 00:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selhurst to London Bridge via Forest Hill 

message: Does anybody know the origin of the plastic lightboxes in the railway arches on the way from the station building to the back exit? Guineveretoo 21:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lightboxes

message: Hopefully, I will be able to obtain a picture of the station entrance and the interior and if someone could enter something about the depot or make a page entitled Selhurst Depot I could include a image on that too! Pafcool2 16:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Hunting gun

message: No seperate notability. JASpencer 19:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why even merge it?  It would appear as though most of the weapons mentioned branch off into generic firearms articles, anyway.  Why not simply redirect this stub to a generic "hunting rifle" article as well? It's not as though this weapon has any particular unique or binding tie to Resident Evil 0.  If it were, say, Rebecca's "Samurai Edge" pistol, that would probably be a different matter.  Gamer Junkie 06:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Resident Evil 0]]
File talk:Money-supply.png

message: Would it not be better to use white text for explaining the color codes?  It's virtually unreadable as black on very dark blue.
:Thank you, I will address that on the next update about a month from now.  Aug numbers have just come out and I would like to wait until the sept year end to make the next graph. Carbonate 01:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Carbonate, I filled in the legend using Paint Shop Pro as a stopgap until your next graph.  Cintrom 21:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thank you.  I will probably make a new one before the end of the calander year. Carbonate 04:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Whiskey Hill

message: If you think the article's not notable, Erechtheus, be bold: submit it for deletion! 
Certainly, the article would benefit from citations, and even from inclusion in other categories -- perhaps 19th-century structures of Loudoun County or some such. But a) it is hardly a stub, and b) the house seems to have a fairly rich and rich history. Wikipedia not being paper , this article seems to stand as a notable addition to the sum of knowledge that is WP. PRRfan 19:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not eager to just have this entry deleted, but I am not sure I understand what makes this place special. I see the photo. When was that building erected? By whom? Who lived there? It seems that there is a lot of less than helpful detail and a lot of helpful detail missing. My preference is always for articles to be saved by the addition of properly sourced information. That's why I didn't just go for an AfD in this case. It may eventually be the course I take, but I see no particular need to rush. Erechtheus 22:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: How about citing some sources for this info? PRRfan (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Inter Alia (Law Journal)

message: No independent notability. JASpencer 19:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per nom. DWaterson 20:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. Trident13 08:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Durham University]]
Talk:Mount Doom

message: "Sammath Naur" is the "chamber of fire".
The book refers to the mountain's peak rising 4500 feet above the plateau of Gorgoroth, but no reference to height above sea level. (Nor, I think, do we know Gorgoroth's elevation.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.176.248.112 (talk) 07:29, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: 9/29/08 - Someone needs to post references regarding the "Origins" section, explaining how he or she came to the conclusion that Mount Doom / Orodruin was influenced by the Norse concept of Ragnarok. Sounds like a personal opinion to me. Also, does anybody know anything about the etymology of Orodruin? If I remember right, I think orod is the Sindarin singular for "mountain" (the plural being ered), while "ruin" is obvious enough. Any thoughts? - Myrddin Wyllt
: The above has been referenced Carl Sixsmith (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins 

message: I've removed the ME-References section as they're not really needed with this being a quite well sourced article. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 10:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there was a tag at the eruption of the volcano after Sauron's final defeat, I've re-introduced one of them, just for the record. De728631 (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: In what way was Orodruin represented by Mount Ngauruhoe? If it's true that in long shots the mountain was either a large model or a CGI effect, and scenes on the slopes of Mount Doom were filmed on the slopes of Mount Ruapehu, then what did Mount Ngauruhoe have to do with the filming? Was it used to construct the "large model"? Whatever part it played should be made clear. Embram (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparent discrepancy
Talk:Rambler (portal)

message: This article is a stub, but not unimportant. Rambler is very significant for russian internet now, for history of russian internet and for russian economict today. Millions of people use Rambler daily, rambler search engine more popular in russia than google.
Thats a reason to FIX this article instead of trash it.
I ask my friends to fix it and i hope he will do it asap.
Btw, Rambler's Alexa.com traffic rank is 103. Alex Kapranoff 20:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For Google, Wikipedia has a link to the official web site.  Why is there no link to Rambler's official web site? 46.34.205.142 (talk) 01:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't ask, just add it. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  official web site
Talk:Thangorodrim

message: "Tolkien was not referring to 'as the eagle flies', but rather 'as the wolf runs':" <-- what is that supposed to mean? --90.196.43.188 (talk) 15:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "As the eagle files" means a direct path, if you fly over the terrain you can go from one place to another in a straight line.  "As the wolf runs", means the distance when you follow the terrain, having to go around mountains and lakes, or out of your way to a river crossing, etc.  twfowler (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: request for clarification

message: The article makes a lot of claims that appear to be sourced to primary sources, although this is unclear as there are no citations present to verify where the content came from. However, there is no indication of why any the content is of any relevance to a Wikipedia reader - there is no context to discuss any of Tolkien's intended meanings or use, nor is there any third party analysis of any of the contents importance to the plot or meaning or interpretations of Tolkien's work. It is merely a regurgitation of plot details. An article must be based on third parties significant coverage of the subject outside of retelling of its existence in the story or plot. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is why I'm proposing the article to be merged to Minor places in Arda. You are completely right that this article is only a short plot summary, there is no out-of-universe discussion/analysis, and the recent AfD didn't manage to bring any to light, except passing mention in plot summaries, which are not enough for a stand alone article and won't solve the issues you're rightly pointing to. Per WP:WHYN, I think merging is the wisest and more constructive solution to retain the content on WP and to keep it in a manageable state. Minor places in Arda deals with...well, minor places in Arda, which, from the content, perfectly corresponds to what Thangorodrim is. There is no issue of size as the content is short and thus very well includable to the target page (this shows what it looks like) and the merge still allows for new content (including sources) to be added while not cluttering the page.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance?
Talk:Orbiter Vehicle Designation

message: Let's just make it clear, Explorer is not a Space Shuttle, it is a replica for tourism -- Lego@lost EVIL, EVIL! |  19:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explorer

message: Does anyone know if OV-095 has a name? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.16.151.77 (talk • contribs).
:According to this page it is "STA-095 Shuttle Avionics Integration Laboratory, bldg 16, JSC" Journeyman 14:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: OV-095?
Talk:Crosscap number

message: How does the cross-cap fit in with this? I seem to recal the Euler characteristic is related to the number of cross-caps but the details escape me.  --Salix alba (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you consider the classification of surfaces, for compact non-orientable surfaces, the classification states for a given Euler characteristic and specified number of boundary components, we have connected sum of a determined number of projective planes minus discs (to get the boundary components).  "Cross-cap" can loosely refer to these summands.  So the definition currently given is equivalent to counting the number of such crosscaps.  --C S (Talk) 23:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross-cap

message: The article says that the crosscap number of the unknot is zero, because it bounds a disk (of Euler Characteristic 1). The disk is orientable, so this doesn't fit into the definition provided. I would have said the crosscap number is 1 because the unknot bounds a punctured RP^2 (of Euler characteristic 0). This is my first time encountering crosscap numbers, so I was not comfortable making the change (in case I have missed something).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IsaacSundbe (talk • contribs) 14:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in example?
Talk:John Chen (pianist)

message: Minor character in novels. JASpencer 20:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Struans]] 
Talk:Ratman's Notebooks

message: There seems to be a possible confusion here between film and novel versions. In the first paragraph of the plot summary, we are told that the narrator is unnamed; in the second paragraph, he is called Willard througohut. Is this an error, taking the name from the movie, or is he not an unnamed narrator after all?24.21.167.192 (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion with the film version?
Talk:Bette Kane

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: Uh, I really don't think anyone intended for her to have a costumed identity known as "Plebe". That's simply what Kate was referring to her as. A plebe is a beginner. That was taken WAY too literally. I'm not wikipedia-savvy, so I don't know how to do anything but leave this message, but I thought if someone read this, this could be fixed. It's a little embarrassing to read.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.171.4 (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ...Plebe?

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: The article and header say Bette but the rest of the article say Betty as does Batgirl.  Confused.  Jubilee♫clipman 19:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She was Betty until 1985 when she was reintroduced as Bette.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtistScientist (talk • contribs) 12:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bette or Betty?

message: "The Bette Kane version of Batgirl will debut in Batman: The Brave and the Bold  in the episode "Emperor Joker". She'll team up with Batman to stop Joker from misusing Bat-Mite's powers."
Requesting source for this information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frits van Houten (talk • contribs) 00:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SOURCE? 
Talk:Vernonia, Oregon

message: I just changed the phrase '... the population was x,xxx at the 2010 census' to '... in the 2010 census'.  Is it OK in American English to say 'at' the census rather than 'in'? If it is, then someone should change it back.  Thank you.  SophiaMSophiahounslow (talk) 10:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Stub (electronics)

message: Woah, it looks like this article went from an electronic circuit "stub" article to an autobiography of a musician.  I'm going to restore this page and move the musician stuff to a new page called Devin Wardlaw.  --Dirkbike 20:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This bit is only vaguely related to the main subject, so I've parked it here...
:== Computer network stub ==
:Electrical length = (Rise time) * (Speed of light) * (Cable propagation relative to light speed)
:Maximum stub length = Electrical length * (1/6) 071115 nve.com
:This is relates to buses like SCSI, RS485, CAN-bus, Ethernet etc..
:==References==
...for the moment --catslash (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This section not entirely relevant

message: It would be nice to explain stubs in terms of scattering rather than impedances; delayed-echo-from-end-of-stub-interferes-with signal-on-main-line sort of thing. It's more intuitive. --catslash (talk) 11:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Scattering

message: The sections on various stubs would benifit from wiring diagrams and circuit diagrams for their equivalent impedance (LC) circuits (circuit with corresponding lumped components).150.227.15.253 (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams
Talk:Muhammad Zahid al-Kawthari

message: The entirety of the article in its current form is drawn from one source whose reliability is questionable, but a quick search shows that the subject of this article is indeed notable and his work has been cited and mentioned in critical studies of the development of modern Muslim thought. A lot of work will need to be done to properly build this article, though. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable
Talk:Comfit

message: And what the heck is "BL MS Harl. 2378"? Perhaps someone should translate in a footnote? - dcljr (talk) 20:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear to be a reference number for a series of items in the Harleian Collection, held by the British Library. Moved to References section. Oosoom Talk 00:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: BL BS Harl. 2378