Talk:Presentation layer

message: As far as I understand the reference, CASE and SASE are part of the application layer, not of the presentation layer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.37.186.62 (talk) 14:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: CASE / SASE

message: What is HTML doing as an example of the presentation layer? HTML is an app layer protocol!Danielcohn 18:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HTML?

message: Err, umm, aren't NCP (Netware Core Protocol) and AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) application protocols? Guy Harris 22:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Protocols

message: A very very minor point, but should we really say "C++ string"? I mean, that sounds like a classical C-string, in C++ there's also the std::string class (which is preferable for many tasks). This text could make someone who is only briefly acqainted with C and C++ to think that "thisisastring\0" is more of a C++ thing, than a C-thing, when actually, it is directly the opposite. Perhaps change the wording to "C/C++ string", or just plainly "C string"? Okay.. this is really a very minor point. :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.192.22.33 (talk • contribs) 
:Good point.  Since that syntax is applicable to both languages, I think I'll change it to read "C/C++ string". — EagleOne\Talk 18:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor point

message: Someone should mention, that data compression is handled by the presentation layer too! Stdazi 20:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  data compression 

message: What is the example section about? What does it have to do with presentation layer in this context?
I will remove it, if no one tries to stop me.
Kremso 21:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples 

message: The page the external link points to says: 
JTM - "Job Transfer and Manipulation" was one of the initial set of OSI application-layer standards
.  So does JTM really belong here ? --Jotel 18:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  JTM: presentation or application ? 

message: Is this different from the presentation layer of the 3-tier system architecture ? If yes, then that should be mentioned somewhere above and linked in the related-topics. I am not sure of that, if someone can enlighten me.
mizzo (talk) 08:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presentation layer in the 3-tier system architecture 

message: Does the host to network and network to host data format conversion happen in the presentation layer? --Sylvestersteele (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  doubts.. 

message: Why do some books (such as Cisco publications) present these graphics formats as being part of Layer 6?  This article should mention this, and clarify what seems to be contradictory information. It seems to me that there is no unique layer 6 "graphic format header", and that they have nothing to do with preparing to send the data over the network, so what is the explanation for why Cisco mentions them at this layer?Jimhoward72 (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cisco - JPEG, GIF, TIFF 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Physical Layer - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 03:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress