lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anthropomancy

message: This definition has been on the page since the outset, but I cannot find a definition for it from a primary source. Google result numbers are not always a stellar justification for legitimacy but of the less than 600 results, a cursory examination leads me to believe not one of them is a source from historical literature. A Google N-Gram search reveals copious examples of anthropomancy but 0 for splanchomancy. 160.33.43.15 (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splanchomancy 

message: Tread carefully here. Be aware that false accusations of human sacrifice were a standard technique in the ancient world (Greece, Rome, etc.) for demonising foreigners. Accusations of anthropomancy were, in using today's terms, by-and-large part of racist vocabulary. Don't always fall for it. 82.44.82.167 (talk) 16:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "I would prefer that the Julian the Apsotate citation remains until we get a source for the Anthopomancy reference." What? Are you asking to keep an unreferenced statement until someone will find a reference for it? It should be the opposite: when you find a good source come and insert the citation... --Sjappé (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

text: What? The burden of the proof is on you, who are inserting the text without reference, not on me. Let me know where to fill an official complaint, but for the time being I shall remove the text. --Sjappé (talk) 19:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok guys, calm down. This is clearly an edit war. Please stop reverting each other and mind the three revert rule. As I infer from the history of the article, Sjappe placed cn tags over the disputed content, then removed the disputed content without giving it enough time (the fact tags where dated May 2008 and the removal was also during May 2008) to be sourced properly, taking advantage of some edits by Redblossom. The reality of those assertions is this. There are at least 3 reliable third-party secondary sources that contain the information. (Please see the analysis of the sources that I've made in the Occult Project talk page). The only thing against the info provided by those sources is that some parts of it are not sustained by the source itself. The reliable sources guideline states that if a source cannot sustain itself then it cannot sustain the Wikipedia. So, my suggestion to Redblossom is to review the sources, filter the info that is not sustained, and add the sustained info. --Legion fi (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations of anthropomancy
Talk:Music Academy of the West

message: There's not much content on both the pages, and the competition is part of the academy. Merging will result in a better overall page. Daiyusha (talk) 12:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, that would be better. I'm fairly new to wikipedia – is there something I have to do beside making a Marilyn Horne Song Competition section? Do I also create a redirect to this section from the Marilyn Horne Song Competition and Marilyn Horne Foundation Competition pages? OrestesLebt (talk) 12:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

text: Found all relevant information under Wikipedia:Merging. OrestesLebt (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I agree that the history of the competition goes back further than its association with the academy, so keeping them separate seems appropriate. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now a month since the last comment, I'm going to remove the merge tag. Thank you all! OrestesLebt (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Marilyn Horne Song Competition]]
Talk:Bezaliel

message: The Greek form of the name is given as Θωνιήλ, which would transliterate to Thôniêl — this would seem to be another name entirely for this fallen angel, and not simply the representation of Bezaliel in Greek orthography. Is this correct, or is it an error? Cynwolfe (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek form of name
Talk:Blavatsky Lodge

message: It seems that the London Blavatsky Lodge is currently located in Glouster Place, central London, however it was founded in Norwood, which today is considered to be a suburb of Croydon. Do we have any sources as to what the historical addresses of this society have been? --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations of historic and present Blavatsky Lodges
Talk:The Book of Fixed Stars

message: In the main text is mentioned a (2012) PhD work in progress by Ihsan HAFEZ.
The completed PhD 
  Hafez, Ihsan (2010) Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi and his book of the fixed stars: a journey of re-discovery.
  PhD thesis, James Cook University. 
is available
  https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/28854/
(.. waiting to be recorded here by more capable hands then mine :/ ).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.202.193.44 (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrt English translation
Talk:Strange Music

message: Als eine eigene Subkultur zwischen metal un Punk , der in 80er Jahre endstand  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.143.230.186 (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange Music 

message: Could someone make a wiki page for King Iso? He has 3 albums and has been in the media a ton now and I think he is deserving of his own wiki page (I would make one but I don't know how to do it from scratch). 
Thanks! AustinVD (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Page for king iso?
Talk:Vehicle registration plates of Hungary

message: What is this license plate? Does anyone know? Plutowiki (Diskussion) 23:47, 18. Sep. 2017 (CEST)
:→ :de:Diskussion:Kfz-Kennzeichen (Ungarn)#Weiß jemand weiter?Plutowiki (Diskussion) 14:57, 20. Sep. 2017 (CEST)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plutowiki (talk • contribs) 12:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone know?
Category talk:British jazz alto saxophonists

message: I'm not sure how categories such as these can ever populate if trigger happy deletists want to rid Wikipedia of them immedietely. Patience my dear friend. My goodness. P-A-T-I-E-N-C-E.(Mind meal 05:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Criteria A1 is invalid for categories anyway- users should use C1, which only works when the category is 4+ days old.-Wafulz 13:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion?
Talk:Panther–Wotan line

message: This should really be linked to the work Mr Wilson did on the Narva--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 11:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narva article 

message: On reflection this probably needs to be renamed to Defence of the Panther-Wotan Line--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 01:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Francis Price Blackwood

message: As per WP:NCP shouldn't this article be named just Franis Blackwood, minus the middle name. Cheers Nomadtales 05:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nup. See WP:NCP#Middle names - abbreviations of names. Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It all depends on what he was/is most often known as. Is + middle name the case here. I have no idea, but it would be good to keep it shorter than longer. Nomadtales 06:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that longer was what he was most commonly called. Thanks, Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:De Coelesti Hierarchia

message: I propose that the namespace for this article be changed to "Celestial Hierarchy"; first of all because this is English Wikipedia, and second of all because the work was originally written in Greek, the Latin title is only a translation (and the translation is not the subject of the article). MishaPan (talk) 15:45, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus.  Favonian (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: De Coelesti Hierarchia →  – As suggested previously, this is a page for an influential work written in Ancient Greek, most commonly referred to by its English name in Anglophone writing. There is a redirect page at this title at the moment but it has minimal useful material. AndrewNJ (talk) 11:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Occult has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Christianity has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Philosophy has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: *Unqualified Oppose and maintain status quo.  Changing my opinion to encourage closure of this RM, as it seems unlikely that any consensus to move will be reached. Tevildo (talk) 19:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 August 2022
Talk:Deva (New Age)

message: I don't know where to put this, but check out the line: sources use the term is used as a generic in the main article. I guess the words term is need to be deleted for this to make sense. Thanks you. Atomrod  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.237.240 (talk) 22:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Dumah (angel)

message: Might you consider that the Angels of Death and Hell are actually servants of God, conducting His Will, per His Commandment, as opposed to being evil beings that were sentenced to a punishment?
Further, there is an insinuation that Azra'El, as a patron angel of Egypt, is somehow evil -- this, too, may be false: Did Azra'El serve in Egypt for the fruition of God's servants, the Jews?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CC:8200:8DB0:9C7E:60F1:6924:3373 (talk) 09:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Military coup d'état of 1964 (Brazil)

message: DELETE this page, do not merge!  This page was already deleted (it was then called "Brazilian 1964 Revolution" per a CfD debate.  This is a non-NPOV splinter page. I'm feeling déjà vu...--(Ptah, the El Daoud 06:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tongwen Guan

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Western education and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  PepperBeast (talk) 01:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Western education" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Seacliff Lunatic Asylum

message: The reference to electroconvulsive therapy in the article is somewhat biased. It is still considered a safe and effective treatment for a variety of psychiatric conditions. --RobbieBurns (talk) 21:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you disagree that its historical use was problematic? I think that statement in the article can certainly stand - I mean, one of the first words in the electroconvulsive main article is "controversial" and the historical uses will certainly count as that. Ingolfson (talk) 23:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECT 

message: I plan to scan and upload some of my personal photos of the site as it appears today to add to the article.--RobbieBurns (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be interesting - though I understand there's nothing left? Ingolfson (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent photos
Talk:Elymas

message: Does Elymas really mean "Wise" in Arabic? I thought it meant "sorcerer" ("magus") in Greek.
:The Greek "magus" is from the Persian meaning "Great or Wise One", which is pluralised to Magi, which was used to refer to the High Priestly Caste of Persia (See Matthew 2:1). This is the sense that the Greek Historian Herodotus (484-425 BCE) gave to the Greek "magus". The Greek Philosopher Plato however used "magus" to mean deceiver or seducer, although no one has yet been able to specify why he did so, nor how "magus" came to mean this so early. Although Arabic isn't the same as Ancient Persian, the Enhanced Strong's Lexicon does state that [Elymas is] the Arabic name of the Jewish magnus or sorcerer Barjesus (Strong's #G1681); and The Complete Word Study Dictionary: New Testament states that Elymas, meaning sage, is the Arabic designation of his name. (CWSD:NT G1681). There is however some doubt that Elymas is from the Arabic root 'alim meaning wise, learned (see L. Yaure (Journal of Biblical Literature issue 79 (1960), pp. 297–314)), due to the fact that why would a Jew in Cypress ... be called by an obscure Arabic nickname? (The Beginnings of Christianity - F.J. F. Jackson and K. Lake, London 1920-33 4:144). According to C. K. Barrets A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, Volume 1, there has been other attempts to see Elymas in the Aramaic חלמא Helema' meaning An interpreter of dreams (ACECAA Vol 1 pp. 615) (Stephen Walch (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elymas the Sorcerer 

message: Personally I think these cartoon pictures detract from the article. They are rather childish. It would be better to omit them. Kanjuzi (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Tri-l (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartoon pictures
Category talk:Anarchism by region

message: Please note, the important Bulgarian anarchist movement is not listed here. I'll get around to creating a stub, eventually....210.84.13.233 06:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulgaria stub

message: So does anyone have any reason why this should or shouldn't be merged with Anarchism by country?  I suppose there is no real reason not to.  If it is merged, I suggest renaming the article Anarchism by country into List of anarchist movements by region, and making that the main article for this category.  Any better ideas?  I suppose the only complication might be that there never has been a clear break between one anarchist "movement" and another along regional lines.  Sure anarchists love to split their organizations from time to time, and there are plenty of different schools of thought, but none (to my knowledge) has ever declared itself to be different on the basis of region.  So would it be more accurate to title the category History of anarchism by region?--Cast 01:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with you, Cast. It should be merged/redirected. --Grrrlriot (talk) 20:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I'd forgotten about this proposal, but that's because I never really made it.  Someone else did and didn't explain why.  I pushed the issue by starting up this discussion topic, but frankly I don't really agree with it.  Granted, I feel that listing anarchist movements by country is inaccurate, but it is part of a larger series of categories by country.  What's important about the category isn't that it necessarily explain the international nature of these movements, but that these articles be easily classified for researchers.  I think I'll retract the idea on behalf of whoever it was who originally suggested it.  They clearly no longer care, as no one has engaged the issue before this time.--Cast (talk) 06:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps your right, Cast. I think it would be a good idea for researchers of anarchism by countries. --Grrrlriot (talk) 16:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge
Talk:Japan Open (badminton)

message: Does anybody know, in which year the Japan Open started? I found, that 1977 wons there Lene Køppen, so at least it started 1977. --Florentyna 06:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In this 2013 article, Gill Clark describes the 1981 event as a 'full scale dress rehearsal before the first "official" YONEX OPEN JAPAN staged a year later in 1982'.  The reason the 1977 edition is kept separate may have to do with the status of Yonex as the title sponsor.  That is, the historical results go back to 1982 for the event bearing the name 'Yonex Open' or previously 'Yonex Cup'.  However, the current website lists results back to 1982 so I have added the first two years' results, with references. Donaldinyongin (talk) 01:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  For the predecessor tournament in our German badminton journal it is stated, that 1977 was the 7th edition of the Japanese open tournament. Florentyna (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Template talk:Pulitzer

message: Currently :Image:Gen pulitzer.jpg is in use in this template.  The image is identified as being in the public domain.  I think this is accurate as the artist who created the medal died in 1931 (over 70 years ago) and the medal itself was created in 1917 (before 1923).  I'm still learning the copyright system, so if this image is incorrectly tagged, and the image of the medal can only be fair use, please remove the image from the template! --JayHenry 06:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Should defunct awards be added to this template? Specifically: Pulitzer Prize for Photography (before it was split into two), Reporting, Correspondence, and Beat Reporting. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct awards
Talk:Galápagos (2006 TV series)

message: I need very much subtitles for this film! I'm from Russia and my English isn't good enough, but I want to see this magnificent film. Send me please this titles here: timoha@lvs.ru. Thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmot (talk • contribs) 16:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Etheric body

message: Hello, this is Coeur-Senechal. 
I should hugely apologize for my extreme idiocy and absent-minded 
rudeness; I had signed up an account here, and reading through 
(well, more like skimming through) barely half of all that I 
should have read before I took any action,... I took action. I 
had previously been under the impression that each of these 
article pages were the work of a vast many, and had no idea they 
were works of individual people. Assuming this, like a moron, I 
had posted up an external link on your very nicely done page 
(and some others for which I should apologize to their respective 
creators for) without asking. Someone named Consumed Crustacean 
had taken the links down, and explained things to me in polite 
detail, that I should come to you first and discuss the addition 
of such links, here, on a talk page, as is apparently explained 
in the parts of the orientative reading, that I neglected to 
fully read through when I first opened my account here. Had I done 
so in the first place, my rude mistake could have been avoided. 
(There's still much for me to read, I'm ashamed to say... still 
reading it now.) 
I feel like a complete @$$ and I'm really very sorry. 
As it turns out, according to the discussion on the WikiProject 
Occult discussion page, the article I wrote detailing a technique 
to be able to see the aura with the unaided eye was not acceptable 
for use here due to the article's whereabouts (anyone can write 
about anything there without verifiability), the fact that every 
thousand viewers on that page makes writers earn a few pennies 
(unrealized fully by me until recently), and that it's "original 
research". 
Once more, my deeply sincere apologies. It was never my intention 
to overstep my bounds and scribble over anyone's art/hard work. 
I'm very sorry. 
Coeur-Senechal (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A heartfelt apology...  
Talk:Segundo de Chomón

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://thebioscope.net/2010/12/20/the-genius-of-segundo-de-chomon/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Securities and Futures Commission

message: User:Citobun: Noted that you reverted my edits to the captioned section. Given that your edit summary "Whitewashing" is quite vague, and your revert removed multiple points contained in the edit, I am not sure which part of the edit you object to specifically. 
I invite you to clarify this so we may have a discussion on how we can refine the edit.
Thank you Carter00000 (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of Edit in "Criticisms" Section
Talk:Straight Talk

message: I'm a bit confused as to why this film is listed in the catagory "Country Music Films." This film isn't about country music, the soundtrack is not country either, it is pop oriented. The fact that Dolly Parton is a country music artist has nothing to do with the film. She is an actress playing a role in a film, her personal career has nothing to do with the films' genre, so I am removing it from the catagory. --HillbillyProfane (talk) 17:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country Music Films
Talk:Fumio Kyūma

message: I have classified this article as a stub. It needs to be expanded on Kyuma's life and career. It also needs photos and infoboxes in due course. Capitalistroadster 06:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an infobox, although more information could be added to it. BilabialBoxing 12:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification

message: What exactly is "controversial" in criticizing US conduct in Okinawa or in Iraq? There is clear controversy in his remarks regarding atomic bombings, but thats another section. Maybe rename sections as "Remarkable opinions" and "Controversy and resigning"? --Magabund 19:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversial" ?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography example

message: The fictional biography in the main article is styled according to the proposed cyclist biography standard on Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography. If you think the biography could look nicer, propose changes to the standard on Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography, and you might use this example to illustrate your proposed changes.
If a change of Johnny B. Better's fictional biography is needed to illustrate your point, change it. For example you want to make a standard for cyclist that changed nationality, change Johnny B. Better's fictional history so that he changed nationality. --Pie.er 06:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

message: s-awards has been deprecated for a while, the new standard is s-ach. Adding the aw flag will give "Awards", rec will give records. Bazj (talk) 07:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  s-awards -> s-ach | aw