lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of political parties in Spain

message: I don't understand why Ciudadanos is listed as far-right. It's a pretty standard european liberal party?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minpen123 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ciudadanos is far-right?

message: The section Political parties running for the Spanish general election, 2011 has been completely reorganized. Links to the English Wikipedia are in one subsection, and links to the Spanish Wikipedia are in a separate section at the end, for the convenience of those who can read Spanish, and separating those links for readers who do not read Spanish. Capitalization was applied where appropriate, and some links were corrected. Spanish language entries without any links were deleted. This section was tagged for copy-editing, but I have performed a complete reorganization.--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We shouldn't sort by Wikipedia; that's self-referential. I have instead instituted an alphabetical sorting, giving links to the Spanish articles where necessary. Huon (talk) 13:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political parties running for the Spanish general election, 2011 

message: People's Party is a right-wing party, not a centre-right party. Actually, many PP's voters have far-right ideals. --Gui 7 (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partido Popular (People's Party) 

message: Both Partido Popular and CiU should be considered [Right-wing_politics|right wing] parties, they comply with the definition given there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvbby (talk • contribs) 10:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view 
Talk:El Djem

message: Is this "a" colosseum?  As i understood it there was only one, the one in Rome.  Did this amphitheatre also have a colossus next to it?
:You're probably right...it should be an amphitheatre, not colosseum. Adam Bishop 22:13, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have serious dobubts the El Djem  should   the third amphitheatre on the word:
1-Colosseo (I s) ext: 188 e 156m, (arena = 86 x 54 m) 
2-Capua(I-II sec) 170 x 140 m. 
3-Milano(I sec)155 x 125.(arena = 71 x 40,5 m)
4-Verona 152 x 123, (arena = 75,68 x 44,43 m.) 
5-El Djem  148 x 122 m
6-Arles 136 m x 107, 
7-Nimes 133 x 101, 
8-Tarragona 109,50 x 86,50 m (arena = 62,50 m x 38,50).
But perhaps I missing some others big builindigs...
regards
lorenzo web@serenoeditore.com
--213.156.52.103 13:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the third??? 

message: According to Commons, :Image:Apollo1.JPG is from El Jem, can/should it be included? Maybe this article needs a gallery at the bottom... 64.126.24.11 22:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apollo mosaic image 

message: The disinfobox at right seems preposterously inflated for the mite of information it carries. --Wetman (talk) 05:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bloated disinfobox

message: The arabic translation both in the start of the article and on the map of the infobox transcribes to "Ksar El Djem". That is the name in arabic for the amphitheatre itself not for the town/municipality.
Ksar in Arabic means castle and that's what the amphitheatre is called, I guess because there is no word for amphitheatre in Arabic, at least not the popular dialect in Tunisia.
'Ksar' from the arabic name of the city should be removed. I'd also remove the map altogether which will also help on the bloated info box problem reported above. 
Now if I could only find an online map of Tunisia in Arabic.
--130.228.251.10 (talk) 09:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The arabic translation: "Ksar El Djem" 

message: Is it actually relevant to El Djem that the main scenes of the movie Gladiator were filmed in Malta? I feel if you want to know about the movie, you can go to the film's page. I would suggest removal. (i have already taken the liberty to remove the following sentence which related to Troy being filmed at the same site on Malta - that definitely had nothing to do with El Djem)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.221.73.75 (talk) 02:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gladiator main scenes 
Template talk:History of the United States sidebar

message: To keep this navbox simple and straightforward I think it would be better if the topics section were removed and only the "history of the United States" series kept. The topics are also linked in the bottom navbox  which has more space.
Alternatively, perhaps inclusion criteria could be formed? I expect links to articles that are topical yet holistic in terms of time and place (at least in terms of contemporary U.S. territory), which would exclude links to the African American civil rights movement (1896-1968), the Civil War, and the South. These are important topics of course however there's also slavery, the Revolution, and the West that are similarly important yet omitted. African American history and women's history would be included.
I favor the simplicity of the first option. Does anyone have any opinions? Remove, clarify, none of the above? —Mrwojo (talk) 23:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topics 

message: The Great Seal is kind of dull as an image choice for this template. Could we possibly replace with something that might cast a little more color on US history? I was thinking of (a scaled-down version of) Washington Crossing the Delaware, as that is a pretty iconic moment in - and unmistakable depiction of - American history. --70.181.184.7 (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I kind of think that topics should appear before ethnicities in this template.  I believe them to be more general and of more broad-based interest.  Thoughts? pbp 14:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Should just merge the ethnic stuff under topics. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 11:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topic vs. Ethnicity 

message: per discussion at MOS:ACCESSBILITY, I have undone the overstyling. Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overstyling 

message: There is a discussion about changing this template listed here: WT:USA#Need to fix Template:History of the United States. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 17:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about changing this template 

message: The links to hide and show and hide lists are now blue on red background which are hard to read. I think it has been that way since the collapsible content changed from being based on class collapsible to class mw-collapsible.
I propose to make link color white again. To do that a have made a suggestion in Template:History of the United States sidebar/sandbox. It uses a new templatestyles page Template:History of the United States sidebar/styles.css, and styles parameters and inline stiles are moved from the sidebar template to the templatestyles page. Besides the change of color of the show/hide links, the underlining of the links in the title and list titles are also changed to white when the mouse hovers over the links. Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 06:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no objections, so I'll use sandbox version now. Dipsacus fullonum (talk) 08:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link color for show/hide links
Talk:Königsberg Cathedral

message: This needs to be moved to another language. Ivan 22:38, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)
a catholic cathedral was stolen by the government and 'given' to another religion. what if this were a synagogue taken by the government and given to a bishop to be turned into a catholic church? my point is this extraordinary historical fact is not as well expressed in this article as it should be. Peppermintschnapps (talk) 01:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Isaac René Guy le Chapelier

message: I think you have to translate "botonnier."  I don't think most English speakers know what it means.  moink 23:25, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: No "right to strike", i.e. to not turn up for work and not be dismissed, was abolished by the law of 1791 - the law of 1791 does not mention a "right to strike" as French law, nor the law of any other country, had ever recognised such a "right". On the contrary - if people repeatedly did not turn up for work it was normal practice, in France and elsewhere, to dismiss them. They then either went into trade for themselves or sought alternative employment. There was no "right to strike" for the law of 1791 to "abolish". 2A02:C7C:E183:AC00:5405:9838:B7F6:9189 (talk) 13:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "right to strike" was abolished by the law of 1791.
Talk:FIFA 100

message: Players 42.61.242.170 (talk) 14:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2018 

message: #BRA #15
#FRA #14
#ITA #14
#NED #13
#ARG #10
#GER #10
# …
(4 countries could form a complete team: BRA, FRA, ITA, NED.) 
--2.247.255.243 (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  summarize 

message: The edit to remove Diego Maradona is wrong. Fpmchu (talk) 08:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad edit to remove maradona 

message: Franz Beckenbauer has died in 2024 2A02:C7C:940F:4E00:44A8:7CD6:253E:4422 (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Shadow311 (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2024 

message: I made this change  as the wording seems poor "". I haven't checked the source, but either our summarisation of it is very poor or it's such a weird thing to say that it doesn't seem worthy of inclusion unless it got a lot of attention. If I counted right, the list seems to include 5 Africans, 2 Asians (4 if you include Türkiye which is a little weird since they play in UEFA) and 3 North Americans, and 2 of those were women from a country fairly dominant in women's football at the time. There are none from Oceania, Central America etc. All the rest so I assume 115 seem to be from Europe and South America. It's very weird to suggest this is a list that is not biased towards Europe and South America. It might be still true that this list is not sufficiently biased towards Europe and South America, but that's a different point. Likewise it might be also true that even with the Europe and South American bias, it's not sufficiently biased towards certain countries in Europe and South America, but again a different point. I checked out the BBC link and it concentrates more on the spread than the bias issue. I'd note that the BBC link does suggest the list was modified, I assume this means an earlier version was leaked or released but this isn't mentioned in our article. Nil Einne (talk) 10:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly express part about insufficient bias
Talk:Westsylvania

message: This article equates Westslyvania and Pittsylvania, but to the best of my knowledge this is not exactly correct. Pittsylvania was a early suggested name for what became the proposed Vandalia colony (a land speculation scheme), while Westsylvania was a frontier independence movement. There's some overlap here, but the circumstances were different. Westsylvania and Pittsylvania were once separate articles: I'll separate them again using the sources I have. —Kevin Myers 04:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Westsylvania ≠ Pittsylvania
Talk:WASTE

message: I don't agree that WASTE is a friend-to-friend network. It's an invitation-only network, but once you've been invited you can discover the IP addresses of users you've never met before from [ping packets]. Michael Rogers
Shouldn't this page be at WASTE? whkoh 01:11, Mar 7, 2004 (UTC)
:Well, I'll be bold and move it then, since there aren't any replies.  ⇒ whkoh [talk] 13:45, Mar 16, 2004 (UTC)
The text mentions that revocation of a license is not possible under the terms of the GPL but this seems to be missing the point. It's not that Nullsoft has tried to revoke a license granted by them, apparently the software was made available by someone who is not the copyright holder (even if he happens to be a Nullsoft employee) and the original license grant is invalid itself. Similarly, if I were to distribute Microsoft Windows under the GPL, MS would not be unable to stop this distribution as I am in no position to distribute Windows under any license.
82.203.196.197 11:01, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is WASTE really F2F?

message: Can it really say that we're linking to the 'official' WASTE website? I mean really, define official. In the eye's of AOL and Nullsoft (due to AOL's bullying or otherwise) it's certainly not official. Perhaps it would be better to just rename the link as 'WASTE on SourceForge' or something similar. Thoughts? Also I think this page could use more information on the posting and removal of WASTE, the controversey it stirred up and the implications of trying to revoke GPL'd licensed code. I'd do it but I can't find any good informed sources on the issue at this time. --AsianAstronaut 01:56, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define official? 

message: i joined and it says the network is down, please Reply.
65.147.189.229 01:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to trade keys with someone else, you just can't just only connect.--Xercessthegreat 02:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Right. There isn't one WASTE network. You connect to a friend and then you auto-connect to anyone that friend is connected with/knows. If two groups never come in contact, their networks will never join. I think this discussion is against talk page rules (see "this is not a forum"), so if someone who knows for a fact wants to delete this, cool. 134.60.115.152 (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What is going on with waste
Talk:Toys "R" Us

message: NOTE: I am not editing this myself because I am not familiar with what the quality of Wikipedia should be.  I am not editing this myself because I don't want to, and arguably shouldn't.
Something worth noting in the edit history,  the store list was removed, and no reason was given.
I am more than aware, though that also brings more concern to me, that this edit was made by a Wikipedia employee.  Employees of Wikipedia have the right to do anything they want with their website, as long as it doesn't violate the law.
I'm not complaining, insulting, or trying to change Wikipedia.  I am just pointing this out. Namer707 (talk) 22:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the store list removed? 

message: Babies R Us should be separate topic on Wikipedia I agree with other people 72.69.208.11 (talk) 00:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as long there are enough information. Cwater1 (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: totally. 2806:108E:10:C54:7C73:4318:3807:AA13 (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babies “R” Us 

message: It should be split. Huge impact on a lot of people. Some know it more than toys r us. 166.192.43.45 (talk) 00:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babies R Us
Talk:Neutral zone (Star Trek)

message: This is probably about to be merged into a list of Star Trek regions of space, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlands (Star Trek) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphic Expanse. Excuse the lack of discussion, but 
# this is already a list
# if those articles were not merged, the likely alternative was deletion.
- Fayenatic (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed, following closure of those AFDs as Merge. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Headology

message: Someone more knowledgeable than I needs to work on this article. In particular: is the word "headology" a Terry Pratchett coinage? Or did he adopt it from usage somewhere else? Is it exclusively associated with Granny Weatherwax? Do people who use it recognize it as being a literary reference to Pratchett's novels, or does it have a life of its own? Dpbsmith 03:26, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ruth Aylett

message: You might not want to link to Robots for the book since it isn't about the book written by Ruth Aylett.  If you want to create a link for the book and write an article about it, try Robots (book) - Texture 04:47, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: I get the feeling this article was only created because she's Owen's mum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.237.91.245 (talk • contribs) 09:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that this article was created in 2004, roughly 7 years earlier than the 2011 publication of Jones' first book and the 2011 creation of the article on Jones, and roughly 14 years earlier than the 2018 date at which the connection to Jones was added to this article, your theories lack credibility. In fact the connection to Jones seems to me the least notable part of this article; I can barely find sources on it at all. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owen's mum
Talk:Saraiki language

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Balochki language and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 3#Balochki language until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Balochki language" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: HistoryofIran ! Two users Snusho and Austronesier has accepted the Variety position proposed by me after a series of argument. HistoryofIran your only position was about use of Lahnda & You proposed to move Lahnda page. Why moving? We use | everywhere in such situations on WP. LingoSouthAsia (talk) 04:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please show me the proof that they accepted your proposal, because the talk page and article history clearly says otherwise. If you can't do that, then please revert yourself. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Actually, why not ask directly   Sorry for bothering you guys, is this true? I can't find anything about it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wrong assertion. There is no revert from both users after my last comment (4 Jan 2024) on Talk page section Variety. They are convinced so Dont get personal and if you have issue on the topic you may take this to dispute resolution if you like. I have valid sources on my suppourt.  LingoSouthAsia (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So because they didn't revert you again they agree with you... what. I'm taking this to WP:AN/3. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: When you dont have valid sources and arguments you will just rely on childish blame game approach and refer to Admin notice board rather than professional Dispute resolution. I knew it.  LingoSouthAsia (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lahnda move
Talk:Khwaja Ghulam Farid

message: It is supposed  that  Khwaja Farid belonged  with Arab family ,but it is not correct . His family belonged  with Sindh Pakistan
His family  is called Koreja . Koreja caste is an old caste of SINDH' Pakistan.Khawaja Farid did n't wrote any Kafi or poem in Punjabi language
This article exsists alredy, see : Fariduddin Ganjshakar. Therefore delete it or merge it. If this is not the same article change the name, its very confusing.
::They are two different people. I'll change the name to Khwaja Ghulam Farid, as this is how he is usually referred to in texts. --Barastert 21:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Khawaja Ghulam did n't write any poem in Punjabi language.His only collection is in Siraiki language in wich Sindhi.Hindi and Braj poems are included .There is no Punjabi poem.His Urdu collection is only in Urdu language with a Hindi song --Rasoolpuri (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punjabi poem 
Talk:Polio

message: The lead paragraph states approxiamately 70% of cases are symptomatic however the source for that information says Approximately 70% of all polio infections in children are asymptomatic I could not find information on the number of cases in general that are asymptomatic. Could someone please revert this Watch Atlas791 (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it. Bob (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  % of asymptomatic cases in the lead.  

message: Is it just me? It seems extremely odd that there isn't a section in the article documenting the ongoing attempts to eradicate the virus (or did I just miss it?). With a fair wind, Polio will be relegated to the history section in the next few years. New funding for the ongoing attempt announced by UNICEF a month ago: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2023/10/one-billion-health-security-financing-eib-european-commission Rafflesgluft (talk) 08:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, searching within the article I can now see it is covered, and does have its own separate article... however I think a top level section titled "Eradication attempts" or similar would make it much clearer to the reader? Rafflesgluft (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eradication 

message: I am reviewing this article as part of WP:URFA/2020, an initiative to review Wikipedia's oldest articles. Upon quickly skimming this article, I noticed some concerns which I have outlined below:
*There are several uncited statements including entire paragraphs,
*The "History" section doesn't seem to have post-2001 information,
*The "Research" section is quite undevelopped and has an "update needed" banner from 2020. 
*There are some sources in the "Further reading" section that might be included in the article. 
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 02:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Z1720I think I've finished. Please review. Bob (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]] review
Talk:List of mayors of Houston

message: The Vietnamese name for "Mayor of Houston" is:
* Thị Trưởng Houston
* From: "HISD và Thư Viện Công Cộng sẽ Thưởng Các Học Sinh Đọc Sách Mùa Hè." Houston ISD. May 14, 2005.
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnamese

message: Seems a little backwards that we have a 'list', but no 'main article' on this topic.  I doubt we need both at this point, but perhaps we should rescope this a little more generally, keep all the current content, and include something on past and upcoming elections?  I note we already have an article on Chris Hollins (politician), largely on the strength of running for this, so it's probably fairly notable in itself.  109.255.211.6 (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Mayor of Houston]]?
Talk:Abalone

message: Should the Abalone page and the Haliotis page be merged? They seem to deal with the same topic.
(I found this out when I wanted to learn the French word for Abalone and was surprised there was no French page linked from the English one. Turns out the French page Haliotis is linked to the English page Haliotis, so it can't link to the English Abalone page as well.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arshwana (talk • contribs) 17:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Haliotis page? 

message: The use of "Channel Islands" caught me for a minute, as I came to this page from Guernsey, "ormer" (redirected to abalone), where it is a delicacy. --2607:FEA8:D5DF:F3D9:1CFD:643F:358D:3A22 (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  channel islands