lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GameCube

message: The quality of the imagery by User:Evan-Amos is amazing, however I'm dubious of the accuracy of the colour. While the GameCube was often graphically illustrated as a purple-Indigo, does the actual physical console look like this?
The colour in the earlier revision of :File:Gamecube-controller-breakdown.jpg looks much closer to what I've seen first hand and what appears online. When photographs do posses this purple tint, it tends to be in warm lighting.
~ Rob984 (talk) 16:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Evan-Amos took both of those photos. On the controllers, I personally cannot really see a color difference. The console does seem less vibrant, but it's also flat rather than curved. -- ferret (talk) 16:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

text: The purple of the GameCube and GBA does not photograph properly due to colorspace issues, showing up as blue-ish.  I used Nintendo promo photos to adjust the colors to what should be "real" values, but it's a finnicky process.  The Controller Breakdown photo is also really old and should have been retaken, but I just never got back to it. Evan-Amos (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of the imagery of the Indigo GameCube 

message: Why is the page simply titled "GameCube"? Shouldn't we put "Nintendo GameCube" on the title? Because that is what the logo says. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:90B6:1DE7:B1D3:FB0B (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbreviated Name 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 March 2024
Talk:Nottingham Forest F.C.

message: I'm confused why it is said that Nott Forest is the oldest professional football club in the world on the first paragraph on the page, isn't Notts County the oldest professional football club in the world? EDIT: I forgot to sign because I'm still new on Wikipedia even though my account is old. However, I asked this question while I wasn't using my account, glad it was edited on the page. Tiplica (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Sheffield F.C. is the oldest club in the world. Notts County was, and Forest is, the oldest club currently playing in the top four tiers of English football. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:9D32:CF2:28D6:4FE5 (talk) 09:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest professional football club? 

message: Many media reports refer to the club as Notts Forest. Recent deletions of this nickname might be POV.  Dewritech (talk)  16:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Notts Forest is an incorrect abbreviation of Nottingham Forest.  Nottm Forest is the correct abbreviation.  Regardless, neither of them is a nickname of the Club.  Correcting to The Reds. Fgn (talk) 00:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notts Forest 

message: There have been 2 City Grounds, the first was formally called the Town Ground but had its name changed to the City Ground in 1898 to reflect the new city status of Nottingham shorty after Forest were evicted and moved out of the city to West Bridgford where they built a new ground, they chose to call it the City Ground(possibly because they had  stationary that gave the ground name as the City Ground). 13thstar (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Ground
Talk:Ecology

message: — Assignment last updated by Jnguyen2003 (talk) 19:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 1101 033

message: Hi everyone, Climate Visuals is working to increase the photographs available to Wikimedia Commons in their library and is seeking insights from the Wikipedia community about the climate change photos you need and would use.
(The Climate Visuals library is designed to increase the impact and engagement of climate change photography and information via their creative commons photo gallery and evidence base).
What are the specific climate- and biodiversity-related topics that you need photos for? What articles or topic areas are you working on, or planning to work on, that could use more compelling photos?
Please do let me know below and I’ll pass the message on. Climate Visuals will use this info to collect and curate existing photos that would fill these gaps. Thanks! TatjanaBaleta (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What climate/biodiversity photos do you need? (Climate Visuals)
Talk:ARC Document Solutions

message: Is this anything more than an advertisement? -- Zoe
----
Made it into a bit less of an ad. --The Cunctator
----
I am an employee of an ARC company.  The editorializing under the "criticism" section is the most company-friendly version of the history of ARC that is available.  While I don't have enough time with the company and perspective to know if it's true (and I have never and will never edit this page out of respect of the conflict of interest), the "criticism" section reads as a justification for ARC's business model, rather than an analysis of it.  As such it is extremely biased (in the company's favor), and probably not very useful without either a more neutral writing, or an accompanying counterpoint.  To suggest that ARC single-handedly saved the reprographics industry is hubris at best.  Consolidation was probably inevitable.  The article, however, makes it sound as if consolidation specifically by ARC was inevitable, and the savior of the industry.  --12.148.54.126 18:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "ARC document solutions provides WP:SOLUTIONS."  Of course it does.  A loose necktie (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solutions
Talk:Battle of Dresden

message: Given that the french lost shortly after at leipzig to the coaltion, I'm changing the result from a decisive victory.
(Lucas(CA) (talk) 03:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: decicive victory?

message: There seems to be a recent trend on wikipedia of contributors who don't bother (or are incapable..) to write much in terms of articles changing the result info box and  then engaging in endless discussions and edit warring about this. In this case, it is quite staggering: the fact that this major Napoleonic victory was nullified strategically by two subsequent defeats of Napoleon's marshals does not make it a "tactical victory. decisive draw.". What is a "draw" anyway? Is this chess? Is this a football game? Infobox results are a stupid concept anyway and an artificial one, except for clear-cut cases. --Alexandru Demian (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Win, Lose, Draw - is history a football game?

message: As Hoffman later recounted, many people were killed by bombs directly in front of him.
I don't understand the use of the word "bombs" here. In 1813 the only types of explosive ordnance were shell, fired from conventional artillery howitzers; rockets (rare); and mortars, which fired bombs. Only the first two were battlefield weapons. Mortars, fired from a platform rather than a wheeled carriage, were tactically immobile and thus were used in sieges, and sometimes aboard bomb-vessels that would might fire them against land targets. 
Grenades, thrown by grenadiers and so-called because they resembled pomegranates (pomegranate tree = 'grenadier' in French), were also not battlefield weapons in 1813. 
Do we know what Hoffman meant? My guess is he was referring to howitzer shells. I have found online the citation referred to, at http://www.epoche-napoleon.net/de/werk/h/hoffmann01/erzaehlungen/die-vision-auf-dem-schlachtfelde-von-dresden.html, but this is a lurid, poetic and non-factual account that makes no mention of "killed by bombs directly in front of him". Tirailleur (talk) 11:35, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bombs"?
Talk:Glenn Branca

message: BE ADVISED: THIS WIKIPEDIA BIO ENTRY CONTAINS FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION.  I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU LOOK ELSEWHERE FOR ACCURATE INFO.
Thanks Again, Glenn Branca
:What in particular? Just the category, :Category:No Wave? —Keenan Pepper 13:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: False information

message: It might be worthwhile to include a mention that Branca was a chain smoker for most of his life, and that this may have had something to do with his throat cancer. 76.189.141.37 (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of throat cancer
Talk:Slave to the Grind

message: I assumed I was to bleep out the curses, even though the song title doesn't. Was this a correct assumption? -asilvahalo
:Up to you, really. As far as I know. If you don't un-"bleep" them, I might do it :)  -- Sam
For an album that was voted 4th best album cover, I had a hell of a time finding a picture.  Never did find one the right size.  It's too small now. Tuf-Kat
Try using this image
 --Fireblues 19:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link for Dr. Feelgood in the opening paragraph goes to the Dr. Feelgood disambiguation page instead of directly to the Dr. Feelgood album by Motley Crue article. Could someone fix this? 164.214.1.54 12:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be fixed via deletion. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 15:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. Feelgood Link

message: Hi,
just wondering if it is ok to add the genre 'glam metal' to this album. It is explicitly stated as belonging to this genre by this article https://loudwire.com/why-1991-best-6-month-release-period-rock-metal-history/
Thanks!! AgentKozak (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the genre 'glam metal' to this album and songs
Talk:Foreign Sales Corporation

message: Poor english:
:Foreign Sales Corporations (FSCs) was a means formerly provided by United States taxation law for US companies to receive a reduction in US federal income taxes for profits derived from exports, through the use of an offshore subsidiary (a "Foreign Sales Corporation").
Please fix! -- Sam
I have tried to make a start on this article. The article needs help desperately. Famspear (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Poverty line in the United States

message: These 2 sentences don't make sense:
:Orshansky's definition calculated the minimum amount of income a family unit would need to purchase food for all family members to eat the cheapest nutritionally acceptable diet described by the United States Department of Agriculture. She then multiplied that number by three, the average percentage that U.S. families spent on food.
How can "three" be the average percentage that U.S. families spent on food? And why multiply by it, anyway?
Maybe the previous writer meant that in the 1950s US families spent one-third of their budget on food. 
By the way, US families now spend around one-tenth their budget on food.
I'd like to see the calculations clarified. What is the dollar amount for "the cheapest nutritionally acceptable diet described by the United States Department of Agriculture"? --Uncle Ed 14:58, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right: the average family spent 1/3 of their income on food, which is why she multiplied by three.  As a further clarification, however, I'd like to know if current poverty line is recalculated using Orshansky's method (in which case we'd be multiplying by 10 now, since the average family spends 1/10 on food), or if it is recalculated by simply taking her measured number and indexing to inflation.  Scott Ritchie 11:26, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Orshansky definition

message: It is proposed that this article be merged with Poverty in the United States.  The two articles cover exactly the same subject matter.  The only differences are: 1) The "Poverty in the United States" article covers the topic much more comprehensively, and 2) the Poverty line in the United States article has a section entitled "Controversy."  This section could easily be merged into "Poverty in the United States," along with any other cited material that is not already in the latter article.  Comments?  Sunray 17:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Sunray 00:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Blue Meanies (Illinois band)

message: I saw a band called the Blue Meanies supporting Citizen Fish many years ago- I even bought a tape by them which I think I've still got somewhere... Is this the same band? They were great BTW (very Ska influenced sound IIRC) quercus robur
*I'm editing some of the discography to coincide with both my personal knowledge and more importantly information from the band's myspace page. Vvibbert (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1) This single would be the start of a lengthy discography and revolving lineup. 
This is a band that was around for, lets say a decade. They put out three albums, two live albums and two EPs. Is this really a lengthy discography?
2) Although their personnel was continually changing, The Meanies' sound would remain consistent
Not very true, in my opinion. Peace Love Groove is EXTREMELY different from their later heavier sounds, and The Post Wave is a completely different sound for everything before (as mentioned again later in the article). 
3) Mention of Members. 
While there are 7 members mentioned in the lineup discussion (none of whom have wiki pages), I would think there should be mention of their bass player, Jay Vance (1989 - 1996?), who now performs under the name Captured! By Robots, and has a wiki page. 
:We now have this "This single would be the start of a lengthy discography and revolving line-up including Jay Vance, a bass player" which is completely weird: who is this guy? why is he being singled out of a revolving line-up? Why now in the article? Also, Jay Vance's page does not exist, I expect it was removed for not being noteworthy enough. I will move this mention of him to a later part of the article, where it fits the context better. I am axx (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm totally in agreement that Peace Love Groove does not sound much like the other stuff. There is a much heavier funk influence with the ska and punk. And to be honest, there really isn't much punk sound on that album. Sweetdudejim (talk) 02:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengthy discography? sound remains consistent? Jay Vance? "Other"?
Talk:List of castles by country

message: I'm going to remove that image from this page, for two reasons:
1 This is just a list page, so doesn't really need an image on it
2 No offense, but of all the Images of castles we could pick to decorate this page, that is not a very good one since it has some random geezer sat in foreground!
--Nojer2 09:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, watch your language, that was me in 1968, sat on the fence in front of the castle, and I don't like being called random ;-). No seriously, I agree that pics in lists don't look right so I support your removal of my pic. One day it can go in the yet-to-be-written Castle of Chillon article, Best Wishes, Adrian "Geezer" Pingstone - Adrian Pingstone 17:43, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I noticed that sometime ago somebody edited out the list of japanese castles. Is there a reason for this? It seems strange, especially since most of the linked castles actually have wikipedia pages for them.
* Probably a vandal.  Go ahead and add them back in if they're not all redlinks.  Wikibofh(talk) 22:38, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castles of Japan 

message: We don't appear to have any castles in Croatia at all. But there's a whole list on this German page. --David Edgar 19:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We're going to run into such cases where we can research and borrow off the other wikis. Rarelibra 20:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croatia 

message: According to what? I was just trying to make things clearer. ::Supergolden:: 17:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's much easier with an alphabetic convention. Otherwise the user has to search twice - once to find the continent, and then again to find the country. Rarelibra 17:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, OK, if you say so. I was trying to get at the fact that castles differ greatly in different parts of the world - far eastern castles and european castles for instance, and so grouping by continent seemed to make some sense. But it was probably a fairly flawed way of showing this anyway... ::Supergolden:: 12:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it was flawed - just think that alpha order is easiest. I think it is rather humorous myself to see "castles" listed in the United States... because such a term has a 'medievil' tone, and the US history is only a few hundred years. :)  Rarelibra 14:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Convention?

message: The Monuments of Portugal really doesn't belong here. That article lists a lot of Portugese castles, so we should filter the castles from that page and create a proper List of castles in Portugal page - ?? Rarelibra 17:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Rarelibra 18:51, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portugal
Talk:Battle of Vitoria

message: Where are the references for the numbers and casualties on the Allied side? The Allied strength of 105,000 is very misleading as is the casualty count.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.50.47 (talk) 23:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Gates, who? I thought Gates meant Gates, David. The Spanish Ulcer: A History of the Peninsular War. Da Capo Press 2001. . However, the page numbers in the citations do not match any info in the book. What reference is 'Gates'? Bryson{Talk}{Edits} 15:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Weird. The first note should read p.390, not 391. The second is page 521, not 521-522. Thanks for catching that. Albrecht 16:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the fast reply, I added that title as a reference.Bryson{Talk}{Edits} 16:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References, Gates? 

message: The article seems to lack reference to the important action at Gamarra-Mayor (e.g., see Frederick_Philipse_Robinson#Peninsula. Can anyone help? Deet (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Village of Gamarra-Mayor 

message: According to the stats box, the French had 138 guns - according to the "Battle in a nutshell" section 158 were captured... quite impressive, but presumably one is inaccurate? Anyone? Audigex (talk) 03:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is pretty clear that all the French guns were captured - Glover says that one field gun and one howitzer left with the French army, and the field gun was captured three days later. There is dispute in the sources about the exact number of French guns, but 151 seems a reasonable number (being 16 batteries of 9 guns), so using 151 as the total of guns and the number of guns captured is probably fair enough.  Ctgnz (talk) 20:07, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of guns? 

message: Where is Vitoria? I think a decent map of the area is required.
Any offers?
RASAM (talk) 15:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Role-based access control

message: I have the impression that this article is about access to computer files, but why must it remain only an impression?  The first sentence of an article titled "homology" may begin by saying "In mathematics, homology is....." or by saying "In biology, homology is.....", etc.  This article should do the same thing, so that people not familiar with its field, whatever it is can tell
what they're reading.  -- Mike Hardy
: The article is about Role based access control, a method of controlling operations on objects (including but not limited to computer files).  But I agree that the article is unclear on this point.  155.101.224.65 (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The commonly accepted RBAC standard is the one that was produced NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology [U.S. Government]).
(This is ANSI [US] and INCITS [international] standard 359-004)
But there are differences between the terminology and diagrams of the article and the standard.
(For example, in the standard a permission is an object and operation pair...
The article's diagram matches up  permission<->operation ...  confusing to anybody that is used to the terminology and diagrams that the standard uses)
I think it would be nice to make the article agree with the official standards instead of inventing similar but different usages. 155.101.224.65 (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard terminology and diagrams? 

message: Deleted section on EmpowerID, it's an advertisement for a particular product, not an encylopdia entry. Moreover, even if the particular product was notable, it is only useable in certain environments, it's not about RBAC conceptually in general. Lacked any citations too, other than a link to the web page of the company/product advertised.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrochkind (talk • contribs) 04:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  empowerID advertisement 

message: It would be useful to contain a list of notable implementations of RBAC, similar to how MAC and DAC pages do. Perhaps SELinux (when using roles) or AWS IAM would be a some good examples, but I dont know enough in this area to write the section?
82.5.138.247 (talk) 08:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implementations
Talk:A Quick One

message: this article is really really good! well done everyone! Kingturtle 02:52, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  kudos! 

message: How is the title, "A Quick One" sexually sugestive? 59.183.17.129 (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A Quick One? Sexually Suggestive?

message: The track listing uses the  and  templates with identical arguments.  Yet one instance puts a footnote label of "[a]" and the other of "1".  Is this a bug in one of the templates?  2605:A601:AADC:2100:C2FA:4802:5984:FA49 (talk) 18:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  footnote label does not match footnote