lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:VR warehouses

message: It would be great to have a pre-demolition, pre-fire photograph. ›mysid (☎∆) 14:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's a few elements of this article hard to understand. I don't know if they're errors, or just poorly written. 
*The demolition began on May 6, 2006 but On Friday May 5, 2006, the older southern warehouse was badly damaged by a blazing fire. Are these dates correct? Surely the fire would cause a delay in a planned demolition for various reasons? Or did the demolition result from the fire? 
*in August 2006, the Finnish police mistakenly tore down part of the protected section; now perhaps I shouldn't question the way things work in Finland, but surely, do police do building demolitions there? This is most peculiar.
*the previous two sentences in that paragraph (before the stuff about the police demolitions) are also very confusing; to paraphrase: part of the building was to be preserved, contrary to Helsinkian wishes, which was to preserve the building. Huh?
Can someone rewrite this and fix up the references. --jjron (talk) 10:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think these are now fixed. --Yaamboo (talk) 08:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article hard to understand 

message: 24.130.198.6 (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: EuroMayDay ›mysid (☎∆✎) 08:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why would Finns riot over anything?
Talk:Windjammer Cruises

message: This article merely describes the meaning and definition of the word "Windjammer", which should be included in a different article, and also Wiktionary. It mentions nothing about the term "Windjammer cruises"! It also cites no references and the links section seems to be advertising. If we add all the companies that offer squared-rigged sailing cruises we wouldd end up with a long unmanageable list. TinyMark 14:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Malcolm Cecil

message: David Taylor’s excellent website (http://vzone.virgin.net/davidh.taylor/carr.htm) gives a confusing origin to the name of the Newcastle-based EmCee Five by saying the band was named after Malcolm Cecil (as opposed to Mike Carr). The personnel he gives for the EmCee Five recordings does not include Malcolm. Can anyone sort this one out? I’m deleting the reference I had included (and copying and pasting it here) until this gets cleared up. Thanx. --Technopat (talk) 12:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  undid my own edit - please help! 
Talk:Maurice's Balkan campaigns

message: Hang on, people. 
I will post a complete translation of my German article de:Balkanfeldzüge des Maurikios. The best is yet to come, thus removing stub-status. Hungerhahn 14:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang on

message: Have fun.Hungerhahn (talk) 12:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here it is, finally.  

message: I have some suggestions and problems that caught my eye when I started reading. There seems to be a space between a period and a ref, also I believe that the first two sections need more references. I suggest formatting the refs into two columns using . I also think the lead should be significantly expanded. That should get you started and I wish you the best of luck.--The Dominator (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: i note that this article uses much info from Curta's great book. So how, then, have we missed his opinion that Maurice's campaigns were less than effective (the contrary to what is presented in this artile). He suggests that his campaigns were for show, and it did not stop (not did it 'intend to stop) Slavs freely roaming Imperial land. Yet the concluding few paragraphs state that Murice's "stern" defense of the Balkans had somehow pacified the Sclavenes. Hxseek (talk) 02:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Effectiveness
Talk:Men Among the Ruins

message: "This work constitutes Evola's only attempt at a book-length explicitly political work and, as such, he regarded it as a failure. Ultimately, Evola would become disenchanted about the prospects of achieving a radical reactionary restructuring of society and would advocate that an enlightened or "differentiated" man should Ride the Tiger – the title of his last work – of modern civilization."
In the introduction Dr. H. T. Hansen  states that Ride the tiger was actually written before men among the ruins  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.101.6 (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ride the tiger
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/IslaamMaged126

message: Image:2
Mainspace13
User talk:52
User:34
Wikipedia:5
avg edits per page 2.59
earliest13:41, 27 October 2007
number of unique pages41
total106
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 14:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for IslaamMaged126
Talk:UPIC

message: I have rewritten this from scratch. I have written in the present tense, because I'm not sure if the UPIC is still in operation; there are examples and live performances on the internet from as recently as 2005, and also these photos here, but it may just be a piece of software now. I wonder what happened to the original computer. Also, there should be a small description of the relation between CEMAMu, Les Ateliers UPIC, and CCMIX, which seems to be the machine's current home. I assume that CEMAMu became Les Ateliers UPIC which became CCMIX, but I don't know for sure. -Ashley Pomeroy 14:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to do
Talk:A New Philosophy of Society

message: This entry seems to be more about De Landa's applications of Deleuze/Guattari's concepts than about the concepts themselves. I've seen other applications of D/G and "assemblage" that look entirely different. I don't think this page is adequate (though I'm not sure exactly how to change it). Markwalters79 17:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the subject of the article is a book by De Landa, not a concept. This was clear before you removed the lead, which I now restored. The book seems notable enough to have an article. --Elekhh (talk) 07:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject
Talk:William Culbertson III

message: Before trying to change Biblical to 'biblical' (which merely means 'books' - not the intended modifier of the terms in the article), this topic shoudl be discussed and reviewed by editors invested in this article.
Otherwise, downgrading the capitalization would be termed a form of 'vandalism' of the article. MaynardClark (talk) 20:40, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Biblical
Talk:Socratic Puzzles

message: We need more information on what is in the book other than the introduction.  RJFJR (talk) 03:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Undoubtedly. By all means add some, if you have proper sources. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 03:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America

message: Eventually someone should get around to opening a "Criticism" section of the book containing the 3 supposed criticisms referenced at the end of the "Development" section. - Joaquin89uy (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a one line summary for each of the 3 criticisms. Igm2103 (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of the book 

message: The criticism section should be balanced with some praise for the book, and perhaps combined into a section called "Reception." As it stands, it reads as if the scholarly reception was entirely negative, which I don't think is remotely true. I may take a crack at it when I have some more time. Jameson Nightowl (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section should be balanced
Talk:Viva Colonia

message: The following line is not correctly translated:
Wir glauben an den lieben Gott und han auch immer Durst
Really means:
"We believe in dear God and have always Thirst".
It should be corrected.
--201.197.2.118 (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, that's what the lyrics literally mean, but for a more idiomatic translation, I have translated it differently. It sounds better in English this way, without changing the meaning very much. Oreo Priest 16:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Because it doesn't have the exclusively sexual connotation it has in English. We tried 'desire', but that also has problems with sexual connotations. Oreo Priest talk 11:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad translation 

message: Is the following statement fact or opinion?
"Despite the absence of particularly Kölsch words, it is not easily understood by all German-language speakers due to the large differences in German dialects". To me, it sounds like opinion. Jammycaketin (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding was that it is in fact easily understandable by most German speakers, but someone changed it asserting that it isn't. I still think it is; I have German friends who don't speak Kölsch who understand it pretty well, and even I, who have only a crude knowledge of standard German (and none of Kölsch), understand most of it. I'll change it back. -Oreo Priest talk 19:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact or Opinion?
Talk:RAF Bungay

message: The article says the station was RAF Bungay but was referred to as RAF Flixton. Huh?  US AAF station lists refer to the station as Flixton.  'Splain, please.  Without an explanation of what the name was and why it was called comething else, B-2 has to be No--Lineagegeek (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:The Brothers' War

message: I changed the sentence "Tawnos brings his wife and newborn son (possibly nephew) to him, and together they begin to build an opposing army to Mishra" to "Tawnos brings Urza's wife and newborn son..." because the use of the pronoun "his" may lead readers to mistakenly believe to believe that the sentence refers to Tawnos' family.
192.139.191.15 (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of McDonnell Douglas DC-10 operators

message: how to update this article ? --Houcinovic (talk) 17:57, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: update
Talk:Kincardine and Mearns

message: Here is the source info for the Monboddo bit added.  Maybe someone with more editing experience than I can properly format it:
* Cloyd, E.L., James Burnett, Lord Monboddo (1972)
* Bailey, Eileen A. FSA, James C.A. Burnett, Charles J. Burnett and Christopher Croly, The Holly and the Horn, Leys Publishing, Banchory (2005) 
Hadrianheugh 15:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source information for Monboddo mention
Talk:Service robot

message: I think that service robots, by definition, should perform a useful function and be able to operate continuously and reliably for long periods. Does the CoroBot perform a function continuously and reliably or is this little robot a hobby robot for educational purposes? Jdietsch 15:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The first reference maintains that ISO says that a service is not an industrial robot. Shortly after that, we have an industrial robot given as an example of a service robot. If we assume that not every robot is a service robot, there should be some attempt to show where the line is, if only by giving one or two examples of a non-service robot, or defining an antonym.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottwh (talk • contribs) 00:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  When is a robot not a service robot? 

message: متي ستنتهي كورونا 196.128.2.221 (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  متي ستنتهي كورونا 

message: 0910925279 156.38.51.224 (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  محمود
Talk:Tetrahydroisoquinoline

message: English is not my native language, so I don't want to edit the main article. 
Tetrahydroisoquinoline is found in Mulungu (Erythrina mulungu), an african plant sedative/hypnotic with long african but short western history. Source: Fahmy, N. M., Al-Sayed, E., El-Shazly, M., & Nasser Singab, A. (2019). Alkaloids of genus Erythrina: An updated review. Natural Product Research, 1–22. doi:10.1080/14786419.2018.1564300  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.18.253.194 (talk) 10:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Ron Hutchison

message: This person’s name is Ron Hutchison (no ‘n’), but the page title includes the ‘n’. There’s also a redirect from Ron Hutchison to the incorrectly-spelled Ron Hutchinson. The page title and redirect should be the other way around.
martin@mcbstudios.co.uk (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name (and redirect) wrong way around  
Talk:1st Fighter Brigade

message: I've translated the Chinese version of this article into English. This is my first translation so please give any advice when possible. Also, can anyone advise on how to process sources from other langauges.
Tanjeeschuan (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article translated from its equivalent in the Chinese Wikipedia 
Talk:Libocedrus bidwillii

message: The tree pictured is not Libocedrus bidwilii - it looks instead to be kahikatea (Dacrycarpus dacrydiodes). I'm sure how to edit/change a picture, but if someone else could, that would be great. Divaricoux (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect picture
Talk:Libocedrus plumosa

message: O thuya kawaka este o specie de pom sau copac de gradina care se plantează peste o juma' de oră 86.127.162.87 (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ThuYa KAWAKA
Talk:Crucifer

message: :"(particularly the Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion, as well as on occasions such as Lent and/or Easter, Lutherans)"
Is the above intended to imply that Catholics and Anglicans have a crucifer in their services routinely, but Lutherans only during Lent and/or Easter? The phrasing is far from clear. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 15:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.  CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Crucifer →  – "Crucifer" is also the common term for plants in the family Brassicaceae (or Cruciferae), and there's no primary topic between those two meanings (see for example the results in the two sets of web searches  vs. ). My proposal is for Crucifer to become a disambiguation page with entries for cross bearer, the plant (linked via the redirect Crucifer (plant)), and Crucifer, Tennessee. I'm less sure about the new title of this article: is "Cross-bearer" common enough for WP:NATDIS? If yes, do we have with or without the hyphen? If not, then an alternative is something Crucifer (Christianity) or Crucifer (church service). – Uanfala (talk) 12:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 June 2022
Talk:Metrosideros umbellata

message: I remember that the tree is sometimes called christmas tree, as it blooms in December. Is that correct? 92.224.5.243 (talk) 18:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pedro Díaz (missionary)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: missionary moved to Pedro Díaz (missionary); dab page moved to Pedro Diaz (without diacritics). (closed by non-admin page mover)  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 December 2021
Talk:Excitatory amino acid transporter 1

message: in your malate-aspartate-shuttle pathway, you link
 the glutamate-aspartate-transporter with SLC1A3 but
 this is the wrong gene, it should be SLC25A12 and SLC25A13
 (isoforms). Example papers where you can see this
 are , , .
 You can see also that SLC1A3 is wrong because its
 protein is a symporter, not an antiporter as required
 in the shuttle.
 Regards,
--Ayacop (talk) 16:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally wrong 
Talk:Seeking a Sanctuary

message: I have reverted most of the changes made during November 2010. Two editors disagreed on the changes, and I give the following reasons for replacing original content:
* replaced reviews. There is no logical reason for removing reviews of the book, which are the primary basis of the article
* replaced category about Adventist media
* the claim the book takes a liberal Adventist perspective on theology is inaccurate and original research. It rather comes across as relatively neutral history
* discussion of inerrancy is original research because it is highly interpretative, and draws sources together to make new claims
* comment "Some authors have described it as the best book about the church..." replaced. This is simply a summary of many of the published reviews of the book. It is a neutral comment. This is a widely held view by experts.
* replaced Adventist Forum meeting, as this is relevant, verifiable material
* clarified sources for some points
* inline external links - I have kept this change, not reverting it, but moved them to the "External links" section
Colin MacLaurin (talk) 04:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2010 changes
File talk:East-Hem 200ad.jpg

message: 1. Gedrosia: was it independant at this time, or was it directly part of the Parthian Empire?
2. Persia: though it was a vassal of Parthia, it was powerful enough for me to consider it a seperate kingdom. Are its borders on this map accurate?
3. West Africa: Did Ghana or any other state exist in West Africa in 200 AD?
4. India: There are a few nations whose borders and/or names are uncertain.
5. Indonesia and Southeast Asia: The info I have is incomplete, but what I do have is pictured on the map. Uncertainties are listed with a question mark (?).
6. Africa: information for East, Central, and South Africa wasn't available when I created this map. Any information on kingdoms or tribal placements would help!
7. Zhang-Zhung: I've never found a map of lands ruled by this pre-Tibetan kingdom.
8. Mongolia: I believe there were more tribes than what is currently listed, but I don't currently have any more information available.
If you have any info on these areas, or if you see any inaccuracies, please email them to me at talessman@yis.us, or post them to this page.
Thomas Lessman 16:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information Needed for East-Hem 200 AD map

message: :Thank you for creating interesting maps on history. I have been using your maps in my article. But I can't find the Xianbei on your maps. The Xiongnu state was routed by the Xianbei in the 1st century CE. Can you please reflect the Xianbei on your map, so that I can use it in the corresponding section of the article History of Mongolia. Gantuya eng (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny you should mention my failure to include the Xianbei in my maps Gantuya eng, I just noticed it earlier this morning while working on the maps for 1 AD and 50 AD. My apologies and thank you for pointing that out! I'll check out the Xianbei article and include them on my next round of updates, probably in a week or so. Thank you. Thomas Lessman (talk) 19:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Xianbei missing from maps

message: Although Emperor Xian technically ruled China under the Han dynasty, he was a figurehead and nothing more. All the warlords were virtually independent, and at the very least should be marked with dotted lines -- http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=china200fe8.png is a ROUGH estimate of the boundaries at the time. -- DragonAtma  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.150.123 (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fractured China

message: Khoisan peoples never farmed. They were hunter-gatherers, some (much later) adopted pastoralist lifestyles. 
Agriculture was introduced to southern Africa by Bantu peoples later. 78.29.170.229 (talk) 17:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Khoisan farmers???
Talk:List of bombs in the Vietnam War

message: Bomblets such as the BLU-3 are not guided, nor are any of the cluster bomb submunitions listed, to my knowledge. The BLU-82 is not a fuel-air explosive, it's actually a rather conventional bomb, if outsized. The idea of categorizing the different types of bombs is a good one, in theory, but as the page now stands they are more misleading than illuminating.172.190.251.71 (talk) 20:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories made meaningless by errors 

message: As a U. S. Air Force veteran who worked on Westmoreland's intelligence staff, I am unaware of the Vietnamese ever delivering bombs via aircraft.
Is this simply a list of bombs available for use, or is it a list of bombs actually used?
Georgejdorner (talk) 20:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnamese bombings? 

message: The following was moved here from the article until reliable proof of North Vietnamese bombing is supplied (which probably means never).
(header)China/North Vietnam==
The North Vietnamese Air Force in contrast fielded only a small number of aircraft on limited, largely unsuccessful roles. The majority of them were fighter jets, with limited ground attack capability. These included the MiG-21 jet fighter, the MiG-19 jet fighter, the MiG-17 jet fighter, the MiG-15 jet fighter, and the smaller AN-2 aircraft.
(header)Big ball bombs===
* 250 LBs, 500 LBs, 750 Lbs, 1000 Lbs, HE
* 50–500 kg, GPAerospace Mig-21 retrieved November 12, 2007
* BETAB-250Vietnamese Aces retrieved November 12, 2007
(header)Fuel Air Explosives===
* 500 kg napalm
Georgejdorner (talk) 20:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preserved removed section
Talk:Debra Bernhardt

message: I wish to declare that I (Denevans) created this page and I have been a scientific co-author with Debra Searles. I will take this page down if this is regarded by Wikipedia as a conflict of interest.  I am new to Wikipedia. Please let me know what I should do. Denevans 17:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible conflict of interest 

message: The article about the fluctuation theorem, and related articles on non-equilibrium thermodynamics, are very well written and explain in an elegant way conceptually difficult aspects of statistical mechanics. 
I suggest these contributions as excellent articles. 
4 August 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.210.24.8 (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks to who wrote the articles about the Fluctuation Theorem, D J Evans, and D J Searles
Talk:702

message: ..The Byzantine Emperor, Justinian II Rhinotmetus, regains his throne...
Is this correct? I think this happened in 705. In 702 he was still a prisoner is Cherson. Maybe he escaped that year?
:nl:Gebruiker:Jcwf
75.178.179.208 16:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments