lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shellfish poisoning

message: It actually should be. --83.232.153.146 (talk) 14:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't this a stub?
Talk:Makino Chikashige

message: In the 2nd paragraph of "Makino clan genealogy," the following remains a bit unclear ...: 
* According to Appert's Ancien Japon:
** A cadet branch of the Makino was created in 1633.[see above]
** From 1668 through the Meiji Restoration, the descendants had holdings at Tanabe Domain (35,000 koku) in Tango.[see above]
** The head of this clan line was ennobled as a "Viscount" in the Meiji period.[see above]  
* Unsourced: 
** The Makino were installed at Sekiyado Domain in Shimōsa province in 1644.
* According to Papinot's Nobiliare du Japon:    
** Descendants lived from 1634 through 1868 at Mineyama Domain (11,000 koku) in Echigo province.Papinot, [see above]  
This needs more work. -- Tenmei (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more work
Talk:Sport in Manchester

message: Shouldn't Sale Sharks have a mention on this page? Or is it because they are currently based in Stockport? It's certainly the main Rugby Union team for Manchester.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.202.81 (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

message: Please note that a significant number of edits seem to be done here by the clubs themselves. These edits must conform to a neutral point of view. Specifically, I am concerned about uncited edits to the section "Rugby League" by User:ManchesterRangersRL. I have added a COI notice to this section and notified the editor of WP:COI, which has a significant amount of information to consider when editing on articles about oneself. I invite other editors to research the material in question and bring it closer to Wikipedia's goals of neutrality, notability, and verifiability. Mamyles (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible [[WP:COI]] 
Talk:List of television programmes set, produced or filmed in Manchester

message: The opening paragraph talks about the City of Manchester, but the third says the list covers programmes set, filmed, or produced in Greater Manchester. Can't have it both ways. If it's the first, the latter need to be removed, if it's the latter the article needs to be moved to List of television programmes set, produced or filmed in Greater Manchester and the first paragraph of the lead pretty much removed. Nev1 (talk) 21:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
Talk:Suzuki World Rally Team

message: I would LOVE to see some SX4 specifications- something very lacking of all WRC sites on the web.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.183.13.16 (talk) 17:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Ida Barlow

message: :File:Noel Dyson as Ida Barlow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Noel Dyson as Ida Barlow.jpg
Talk:Susan Barlow

message: The source used citing Susan's birth and first onscreen appearance is incorrect. Susan was born in the episode airing on the 5th April 1965, not the 15th as is stated. Daran Little's book is incorrect. Corriepedia, which has synopses of every episode which has aired has the details, and the Coronation Street DVD boxset of episodes from the 1960s features the episode. I can't find a reliable source on line, however, to prove this. Please could someone help?62.31.38.49 (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreliable Sources
Talk:Natalie Barnes

message: The first sentence should include Coronation Street and all that jazz. I would do it but I'm scared of ruining the format these pages tend to have, I'd rather leave it to someone that knows their stuff. Point is, right now it's a bit silly to say that Natalie Barnes is a thing that is played by Denise without actually specifying anything else. Styrofoamblade (talk) 10:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: DoneGunGagdinMoan 13:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  should probably include where she's from
Talk:List of lawmen and prime ministers of the Faroe Islands

message: I'm rather critical to equating the older løgmenn (up to 1816) with prime ministers.  There is some validity of the translation for the modern løgmenn, since the Faroe Islands constitute an autonomous region within the Danish realm from 1946 on, and the løgmaður indeed is the head of its government. However, the older office had no similarity with "prime ministers"; even in the oldest time, when he was elected by the men at the general assembly, there were never any kinds of ministers, and there was no "government" which he could lead. (Before the subjugation of the islands under the kings of Norway, you might possibly compare the løgmaður and other "lawspeakers" with presidents, but never with a prime minister.  Actually, the power was essentially held directly by the assebly of free men, and only in a minor manner delegated.)
The Faroese have chosen to resurrect the old term, in order to stress an historic continuity.  This may be.a valid reason to treat both the older and the modern løgmenn in the same article; but I think that the article then ought to be named differently.named. JoergenB 23:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The prime minister of Faroe islands is Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the same as in Denmark. Faroe islands also vote the Danish election. With other words a "lagmand" is not the same as a "statsminister/primeminister". --Tesko111111 (talk) 01:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes that is correct. The official word is Premier as seen here http://stm.dk/_a_2956.html --Kisualk (talk) 12:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is all wrong 

message: In the norwegian Norsk (bokmål) wikipedia this is 2 separate articles... 193.157.236.246 (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Løgmaðurs of today and the historic ones 

message: I think if an article has not had any sources since 2016, but has a lot of content this is a massive problem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EmilePersaud 20:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Fred Elliott

message: *RaintheOne BAM 03:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Given that the band 'Right Said Fred' were formed in 1989, and Fred Elliot only appeared in Coronation Street in 1994, the assertion in the first paragraph seems likely to be playful bollox or, at the very least, untrue. It's immediately countered on clicking through to the Right Said Fred page. Unless a citation is provided to support the sentence, I shall remove it within a few days. Much as I like a little fun. --Ned-kogar (talk) 22:17, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was vandalism by a random IP, i've reverted it and warned them. D4nnyw14 (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right Said Fred?
Talk:Christian Gatley

message: It is not appropriate to keep referring to Hayley's previous name as it has no bearing whatsoever upon this article. It has a place in the Hayley Cropper article, but placing it here (twice) is bordering on the offensive.
When people change their name, you don't keep referring to one they used to have. It's not appropriate, and it's not polite. I will undo again if it happens again.
Hardylane (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayley's Previous Name
Talk:Lands Tribunal (England, Wales and Northern Ireland)

message: Someone has moved the old lands tribunal article on top of this one and deleted what was here. Could someone who understand these things put what I did back? Francis Davey 08:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move / merges 

message: I thought it was cleaner to have a separate page for each tribunal, so I have made the Lands Tribunal purely a disambiguation page. Francis Davey 23:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:Jim McDonald (Coronation Street)

message: This article could do with a cleanup. :) I'll try and do it soon. (Cepb 19:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The character of Jim McDonald has re-appeared from time to time. He did recently exit the show once again, but the character was not killed off and until this happens, or if Charles Lawson quits acting (etc), then we must state that Jim McDonald "is" rather than "was" a character in Coronation Street, as there is always a possibility that he will return to the series. (Aynuk 12 18.08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
It needs to be "is"anyway, whether or not they have left, even if they are deceased, e.g: Mike Baldwin's death was seen on screen but that dosen't stop him being a fictional character, does it? He is and always will be a fictional character, so whether Jim returns or not is irrelivant. Notdoppler (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed "is" to "was"

message: The gun he used in the April 2011 robbery was accurately a Sawed-off shotgun. Simply calling it a "gun" is not very informing. --81.102.228.43 (talk) 04:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sawed-off shotgun

message: * - Could be used for either Steve or Jim.RaintheOne BAM 05:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: So why no Home about it? (Catwise (talk) 04:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim McDonald in highfield prison
Talk:Karen McDonald (fictional character)

message: it was told that Karen will return to Coronation Street for its 50th Annaversary in December 9th 2010.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.133.87.22 (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return 
Talk:Spider Nugent

message: This article needs a complete rewrite.  The wording is terrible.  I'va made a few ammendments but something really needs to be done. Mtaylor848 (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted, I've moved this to the appropriate list for now. Hopefully one of the copyeditors will come along and sort it. If not, I'll put it on my to do list :) Ooh, Fruity  @ Ooh, Chatty 22:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Szkło kontaktowe

message: I removed a serious POV and biased political diatribe attacking one political camp in Poland for the benefit of another. Identifying this television program as "popular among excommunists" is not factually accurate, and the statement lamenting the last president's "tragic" death (as it was stated emotionally and improperly in the article) and supposed victimization at the hands of the opposing political camp are inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
--Atwardow (talk) 12:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The show is political. supposed victimization - wow!Xx236 (talk) 12:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Peter Barlow (Coronation Street)

message: I think Shelley should be removed as his wife. The marriage was not legal — she has no more been his wife than Hilda Ogden has. 
The bigamy fiasco is explained in the article anyway. --Vabadus19 (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shelley Unwin 

message: RAIN*the*ONE BAM 04:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I think you'll find Peter also appeared in 1978.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boushenheiser (talk • contribs) 18:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1978 
Talk:Gunner (student)

message: The following comment by Metropolitan90 includes some references which can be used to improve the article. This term seems to be a more recent version of "teacher's pet,", "suck-up," "ween," or "brown nose" from earlier generations. Thanks, Metro!Edison 19:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to a lack of discussion, this article has been merged into Student#Other terms and this page has been changed to a redirect to Student#gunner Dbiel (Talk) 19:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From the AFD

message: Closurer of the afd should have no bearing on the result of any discussion over the merger with Student#Other terms. Gnangarra 10:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to a lack of discussion, this article has been merged into Student#Other terms and this page has been changed to a redirect to Student#gunner Dbiel (Talk) 19:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-11-7 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:John Stape

message: Me, Chris the master has now given this page to itself, due to added information on its redirect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris the master (talk • contribs) 17:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - Reception
* - Yahoo feature
* - This is a pretty good feature.RaintheOne BAM 19:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: why is a page about a coronation street character protected? anyway he left peter's bookies should he not be listed as unemployed in his occupation?
86.156.7.238 (talk) 00:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Semi-protection was [ requested] and [ applied] on May 21, 2011 due to IP vandalism. It will come off protection on the 22nd of this month. As for your request, could you provide a reliable source? — Bility (talk) 00:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 86.156.7.238, 4 June 2011 

message: John Stape officially left the show in early 2011, and came back in late 2011 (at which point the character died). It is presented in the infobox that John Stape's character duration is given as "2007-2011", which in essence is lumping all of John's appearances in 2011 together. The problem with this is that this does not demonstrate that the character had two separate stints and officially left the show for a period of time (which itself is even stated in the article). Is there a consensus/guideline/policy that states that years should only be mentioned once and differing stints ending and starting in the same year are to be ignored and counted as one? This would seem fairly bizarre considering a character can be in a show at alternative ends of the year (i.e. leaving in January and returning in December) and not have their absence demonstrated whilst other characters can be absent for a relatively short time (i.e. December to the following January) and have their absence shown. Burbridge92 (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a little inuniverse tbh. He left sometime in the Summer and returned in October.. A couple of months. There is nothing wrong with the dates, they are a fact. He did continue to appear in 2011. What if a character leaves each month, do we list the duration as "2007-11, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011" The duration is a record of years that character appeared in the series. Also, how do you know that Hawley was not in contract still.Rain the 1 00:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Stape in 2011
Talk:Jed Stone

message: Jed Stone will be back in coronation street and will return on screens in December 2009.
Jed Stone will be back in coronation street and will be on screens in december 2009.
The date in December when Jed Stone returns back to coronation street will be Wednesday 2nd December 2009
How the hell was shortening the dates to 1961-1966, 2008-2009 vandalism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.40.54 (talk) 11:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dennis Stringer

message: What on earth is this string of gibberish meant to mean?
while driving Les to hospital, died in a car crash, also in which at that time Janice Battersby's daughter Toyah Battersby was in a relationship with mechanic and stripper Sam Kingston. 
ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsensical text
Talk:Dennis Tanner

message: Should this page still be considered a stub? it has considerably improved beyond stub in my eyesHewhoamareismyself (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Stub class 

message: Dennis can't be related to Julie as it is Eileen's paternal grandfather which is not Julie's grandfather as they are half sisters and related via their mother.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soaper1234 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you watch Coronation Street? Eileen and Julie have the same father, different mothers.Rain the 1 14:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus Dennis is not their grandad, lol!Rain the 1 14:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julie relation
Talk:The Taylor Swift Holiday Collection

message: In the booklet for this EP it says for Silent Night Arrangement: Taylor Swift so I added that in the Personal section. JamesAlan1986 (talk-Contributes) 12:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just wanted to point out on the iTunes page it says this in the iTunes Review: "The Taylor Swift Holiday Collection was re-released for wider distribution in December 2008." ref: http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/the-taylor-swift-holiday-collection/id296552366 just thought I'd point that out. JamesAlan1986 (talk-Contributes) 08:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Add 

message: Rhapsody Originals is a part of Taylor Swift's discography, so there is no reason not to include this. Template:Infobox album#Chronology literally says that "albums or EPs don't need to have their own Wikipedia article link to be included in the chronology." Putting this in the chronology does not make the article not explained fully. So please stop using WP:AUDIENCE as a reason to incorrect the chronology. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 22:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I literally didn't remove it. Review your last revision. You shouldn't be so quick with the "undo" button. Dan56 (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the edit history, I support having Rhapsody Originals and iTunes Live From SoHo in the chronology.  CountyCountry (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes but you've removed it so many times before so I decided to start a discussion about it. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was offering, as a compromise between our competing ideas, the decision to pipe-link the titles so they direct readers to the EPs' entries in Taylor Swift discography#Extended plays. Dan56 (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology
Talk:Montgomery (snagboat)

message: Does anyone know more about national snag boat history?  I've contributed a lot to the WT Preston article, but I know nothing about the Montgomery.  Is there a museum there or any other historical resources?  I'm interested in starting a Snagboat article but I need more information.  Nicholas SL Smith (talk) 01:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information - Snagboat history 
Talk:Lockheed Martin Information Technology

message: This Article should be renamed to Lockheed Martin Enterprise Systems and Solutions or merged into an article about it. Hollowman512 23:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
File talk:Xbox360 scratch.PNG

message: This picture should -not- be a candidate for speedy deletion!
* The article where the rationale for the fair use of this picture can be found is "Xbox 360 technical problems", an in particular the comment no 37, which points to a broadcast of the Dutch public broadcasting company VARA, which in a broadcast from a the TC program KASSA, which is publicly as a YouTube movie, published by the VARA itself, as can be seen on their website here . The picture itself is simply a screenshot of a single frame from the movie itself.
* The picture is -not- replaceable with any other generic picture, because its not simply any random scratched CD, but is the visible proof of the result of the tests that were conducted by the VARA/KASSA. 
* I therefore feel that this picture is irreplaceable, and is in the public domain, and should therefore -not- be a candidate for speedy deletion!  Mahjongg 23:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rationale for speedy deletion of Image:Xbox360 scratch.PNG
Talk:D-galactose 1-dehydrogenase

message: The redirect Galactose 1-dehydrogenase has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   ― Synpath 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Galactose 1-dehydrogenase]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:National Students Federation

message: Considering that there is now nothing left of this article, why has what seems to have been, at various intervals, a substantial article, been reduced to a single line? The URL for the organization was even deleted. Are there people on Wikipedia (not of official sanction) possibly censoring this article and its content? Stevenmitchell (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, please try to exhibit good faith when dealing with other editors in the encyclopedia and remember that although commenting on content is welcome, personal attacks are regarded as a bad editing practice. thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 13:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Has Been Deleted

message: تحریک نظام عالم یوتھ کا منشور کرپشن کو جڑ سے اکھاڑنا ہے اور امن بھائی چارے کو فروغ دینا ہے۔ 2401:BA80:A312:F630:17A9:37C:9B83:E7DC (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tahreek Nizam-e-Alam Youth Pakistan
Talk:Taylor, Bean & Whitaker

message: An entire chunk of text was taken from one of the WSJ articles used as a reference. I removed the text, but I'd appreciate if an admin checked it over. Sorry if I made a mistake; I'm using the mobile app.
Thanks,
Gageills (talk) 12:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Kris O'Dowd

message: I'll try and take a stab at fixing this article in the future.  There's definitely useful, notable information that can be provided (esp. from the 2007 USC Trojans football team page); right now this is in a very problematic draft --especially the lede. --Bobak 00:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Stalingrad-class battlecruiser

message: The infobox says "9 - 12 inch (305 mm) guns, 3 twin turrets".  Three twin turrets does not equal a total of nine guns.  I'm guessing that this should refer to nine triple turrets, but I don't have a reference handy to check.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackeagle (talk • contribs) 12:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Guns/Turrets

message: How can this be correct since the ships had been scrapped in 1953? If no cite is provided I'll delete this paragraph. The earlier paragraph is correct, although I'm not really sure that it's notable since it never got past the study stage. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer: it's probably not. I'd include the first paragraph, though; it may never have gotten past the study stage, but it is worth mentioning that it was studied. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 02:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Project 82R

message: An IP keeps adding +20 mm to the infobox, but the source that he cites doesn't say anything about that as best as I can figure out through Google translate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Waterline belt armor thickness