Talk:EMD GP40-based passenger locomotives

message: I flagged this as needing context, since it never says what it's about. However, there are more than a dozen pages linking here, so this doesn't seem to be a nonsense article.
:Article finished Ken S. 17:57, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: I tagged this article because, while I contains a treasure trove of information, it reads less like an encyclopedia article and more like a posting to a railfan message board. 
Much of the detail, such as specific horn models or the long lists of locomotive numbers detailing the exact provenance of each unit,should go, as it is of little interest to a general audience, and Wikipedia is not a railfan's spotters guide 
Truthfully, each section should probably be stripped down to answer three questions: 
*What agency(ies) used the model?
*How many were built?
*When were they (re)built, and by whom?
Details beyond that, other than perhaps a distinguishing feature of that model, should be eliminated. After all, these locomotives are more alike than different, being based on a common platform, and widely adopted due to the commonality of that platform. This article should be a shorter, more basic overview of that, not the be-all-end-all guide it is trying to be. oknazevad (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done a small amount of tidying-up but, because of my limited knowledge of these locomotives, I will leave the rest to others. Biscuittin (talk) 21:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to do a bit more and I've removed all the "Roster" sections to comply with the "excessive detail" tag. This might be controversial and, if somebody wants to revert it, I don't intend to start an edit war. Biscuittin (talk) 18:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2009 tags 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:EMD GP40-2H.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on EMD GP40-based passenger locomotives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060312193401/http://www.hobokenterminal.com/alltime.html to http://hobokenterminal.com/alltime.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article is a regular magnet for unsourced information and has entire sections which are unsourced. I think a tag at the top indicating a need for improved references is justifiable. Mackensen (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations issue 

message: This article seems to be missing the most significant EMD GP40-based passenger locomotive, the F40PH and its derivatives—475 units built new by EMD dwarfs by far anything else on this list, and the original F40PH was just a GP40-2 with an HEP generator and a cowl.  I'm curious if this is a conscious choice, since I think it would make the most sense to see a section on the F40PH or at least a reference to its own article.  Thoughts? Akosut (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say it's a conscious choice, inasmuch as the EMD GP40 and EMD GP40-2 are distinct designs. Mackensen (talk) 22:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

text: The point of this article is passenger variants of the hood-unit GP-40s, not the cowl-unit F40s, which, although mechanically based on the same technology (and sharing a large number of parts originally), is a separate model with its own article. A see also link is appropriate, but a section is out of scope. oknazevad (talk) 21:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  F40PH 

message: There needs to be a change done to this article, as there are some surviving unrebuilt GP40WH-2s currently owned by leasing firms (with one (PNLX 57) being spotted in Winter 2022 pulling Steam Railroading Institute's North Pole Express in Michigan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:7836:9E00:B532:7F3D:D4F6:8363 (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "I saw it one day" doesn't count as a source. If you don't have a reliable source for your claims, they will not be added to the article. We don't "need" to do anything just because you say you saw something. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Unrebuilt GP40WH-2s

message: This page needs a TON of updating, especially with the GP40WH-2 section. The reason I state this is that the remaining GP40WH-2 units that have not been rebuilt for SunRail are in possession of leasing firms (for example: ex-MARC #57 is owned by PNLX). TrainBen2k (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. WanderingMorpheme 13:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023