Talk:Winnie the Pooh (Disney character)

message: These two articles again have their own talk page:
* Winnie the Pooh (THIS article about the Disney franchise)
* Winnie-the-Pooh (the article about the original character)
Some previous discussions related to the Disney franchise may be moved here.
(Glad somebody caught that. Thank you!) Proofreader77 (talk) 20:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: This should be merged with Winnie The Pooh, For Disney's Winnie The Pooh, is the same Winnoe The Pooh as A A Milne's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.204.215 (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This was discussed two months ago: see here. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: move to Winnie the Pooh (Disney). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Winnie the Pooh → Winnie The Pooh (Disney) —
*To many, the difference between name Winnie the Pooh (with spaces, about the Disney version) and name Winnie-the-Pooh (with hyphens, about the character) is a typographical feature not enough to distinguish, on a par with "capitalization or not". Let Winnie the Pooh and similar redirect to Winnie-the-Pooh; let Winnie-the-Pooh hatlink to Winnie-the-Pooh (disambiguation), which should list all Winnie-the-Pooh-related pages. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're confusing what the nominator is suggesting. He or she's saying "Winnie the Pooh" should redirect to "Winnie-the-Pooh", the character, not to a disambiguation page. YeshuaDavid • Talk • 23:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-reading, perhaps I missed the comma. Still think there should be a clearer hatlink on the redirected page to point to the franchise as well as the disamb page. The casual observer who wanders to the WTP page, as seen by a recent talk comment posted there, may not be aware that there is a distinction between the two if it is not clearly mentioned as such in addition to the disamb page. SpikeJones (talk) 14:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: This page has been temporarily semi-protected because of the repeated addition of unsourced names by IP addresses. Per WP:BLP policy, all names of cast and crew require reiable sources. Those without any sourcing will be removed. Further attempts to add unsourced names may be considered vandalism.  — CactusWriter | needles 04:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protected

message: Per our guidelines at WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NFF and WP:BLP, only those names which have reliable references can be used in this section about an upcoming film. This a future film, still in production, in which there can (and often are) many subsequent delays and changes in personnel. There is no crushing need to add speculative information here at any time. I've deleted the names which do not have a solid reputable reference. (Note that consensus opinion on Wikipedia is that IMDb is not a reliable source for future films -- please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Future films#Resources) It is not up to Wikipedia to report rumors or speculate -- rather only provide factual information supported by solide sources. Please either wait for the film's release, reviews by established journalists of the finished product or official announcements from the production company.  — CactusWriter (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Speculative information in revival section

message: Although we sometimes call Winnie the Pooh as "Pooh" the line "or Pooh for short" is not needed. ACMEWikiNet (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pooh" for short

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Winnie the Pooh (character). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060629012931/http://edition.cnn.com:80/2006/LAW/06/26/scotus.pooh.ap/index.html to http://edition.cnn.com/2006/LAW/06/26/scotus.pooh.ap/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: An IP has been trying to remove the referenced material from The Guardian and BBC regarding the censorship of the subject's name and image in China. I will leave this as a discussion point for all editors to try and avoid an edit war. Ifnord (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There are multiple, trusted sources which state the image and Chinese name is banned on Chinese social media and networks. The fact that physical plushies may be available is irrelevant to that discussion. Ifnord (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitewashing Chinese controversy