Talk:Austin Metro

message: The above text appears to have been mistakenly added to the talk space by user:213.122.37.28.  This is the case for a number of pages possibly including:
* Talk:Peugeot 206
* Talk:Ford Mondeo
* Talk:VW Golf
* Talk:VW Polo
* Talk:Rover Metro
* Talk:Fiat Tipo
Since these appear to be good quality edits, please merge the new text and delete both it and this notice when done. I shall try and do some too but don't have much time.  Thanks. akaDruid 13:54, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article text in Talk space 

message: I guess we all know there was a "factory" open-top version of the Metro/100, but unless I missed something (which is very probable), the article does not mention it at all. It would be very interesting to find out when it was launched, how it was developed and who actually built it - BL/Rover or some coachbuilder? BTW, where was the Metro actually built - Longbridge or elsewhere? Bravada, talk - 13:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find a reference to it - but AROnline has a number of details on the car and I think is appropriate as a trusted source. DVLA records indicate 423 UK-registered cars; brochures indicate an original intent to launch the car in 1992/3 for the Metro Cabriolet - the 114 Cabriolet being (re)launched in 1994/5. The Cabriolets were built on the same production line as regular Metros according to most sources, and IIRC they're a Longbridge-assembled car). The Cabrios were developed initially with LAMM (also responsible for the official Mini cabriolet), then development was completed with Tickford, according to AROnline's sources. Prior to doing some research and getting concrete information, I'll upload some pictures of our 114 Cabriolet for appropriate use. TastyOther (talk) 07:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabrio 

message: FYI: - Leonard G. 22:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image found on commons 

message: I am, frankly, stunned that even an item of such significance as the MG Metro 6R4 Group B rally car does not appear to carry sufficient clout in order to warrant its own, separate article from the 'mere' Rover Metro 'shopping car'. I suppose I'll have to 'be bold' and tend to that. MRacer 22:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! I made a new MG Metro 6R4 page. Let’s hope it lasts. Hotlorp (talk) 01:41, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MG Metro 6R4 

message: Took out this bit "or more specifically Austin Rover" referring to the launch of the Mini Metro. Austin Rover did not come about till 1982. I think it was still Austin Morris that launched the Mini Metro in 1980.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.231.233 (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austin Rover reference 

message: I've just changed the main infobox from "Austin Metro" to "Rover Metro" since it's not (apparently) a generation infobox but a master one. It seems wrong though to then have no Austin Metro generation box. But the bigger question is, why is this article not in fact titled "Austin Metro", since that was the model's first name, at launch. Thoughts? – Kieran T (talk) 17:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted to post the move request later on, and you are absoluely right, the article should be called "Austin Metro". I am not sure we need "generational infoboxes", there was only one generation, though it lived unusually long... PrinceGloria (talk) 17:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd definitely support moving from Rover Metro. However, now that I think about this more, I wonder if we should really go with the best-known and longest-lived name, Austin Metro, or instead the name it was actually launched with, which the article reminds me was in fact Austin miniMetro. Hmm. – Kieran T (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can go for "Austin Metro" not because it is the most known (this is very subjective, to me living in the continent the car is a Rover 100), but because it is the original name, the "mini" component was dropped pretty quickly and it was added only after the name was decided for reasons explained in the article PrinceGloria (talk) 19:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the vast technical differences between the cars, and poor quality of information on the R6 Metro, I wonder if the Austin Metro and Rover Metro/100 would be better served by two pages? If not, a lot more information really needs to be given to the four stages of Metro; the original model was facelifted for 1985 including some interior design improvements as well as exterior (and many special editions which might be worth documenting, plus cabriolet conversions from Britain and Germany), the K-series R6 models are 1991 and involved a significant redesign of the drivetrain, body and interior. The 100 series is a facelift of the R6 for UK purposes. TastyOther (talk) 07:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Generations

message: * The page should definitely be changed to 'Austin Metro', the car spent most of it's life being badged as an Austin.  The car isn't well known as a Rover, however as an Austin it is one of the best known models, along with the Mini, the Allegro and the Seven.  Most of the Rover badged models were part of the 100 series. User:Mtaylor848 12:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rover Metro →  — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Naming

message: moved. --RegentsPark (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Rover Metro →  — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: "The Rover 100 finally ceased production in 1997, ironically being out-lived (by two years) by the original Mini it was meant to replace."
contradicts:
"On 8 October 1980, BL introduced the Austin mini Metro. It was intended as a big brother, rather than as a replacement, for the Mini,"
and
"It was intended to complement the Mini"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.64.150 (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini Replacement Contradiction 

message: Do any TV documentaries or DVD's exist for the mini-METRO ? (not the 6R4 which has it's own DVD available from Duke video). Odd how a documentary or other TV programme exists for just about every other popular car but not the Metro as yet it seems. --Live Steam Mad (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is one produced by the British Motor Industry Heritage Trust, it's part of this DVD. You can see it on Youtube: . --Una giornata uggiosa '94 · So, what do you want to talk about? 01:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentaries ? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Austin Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080503150232/http://www.austin-rover.co.uk:80/index.htm?lcvcdvf.htm to http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?lcvcdvf.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Austin Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111007102248/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/fcpu33.pdf to http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/prgpdfs/fcpu33.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified