Talk:Reading Company

message: I'm not sure that the article should be here. The company only had the Railroad name until 1871, when it became Railway. Then in 1923 it seems to have become the Reading Company - should it be there? Or should we go by the last railroad/railway name? This also affects the category. --SPUI (talk) 28 June 2005 03:31 (UTC)
I'm sorry, this story is just too weird. Not that a US railroad company ended up operating cinemas, but that it ended up operating them in Australia. Is it verified? Gazpacho 07:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess it's true. Not any weirder than Berkshire Hathaway, I suppose. I'll fill in some details. Gazpacho 21:36, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name?

message: Rather than say that Richmond became a "very large coal terminal," may I suggest something like, "By the midnineteenth century, Richmond was one of the largest, if not the largest coal terminals in the country."
My source is James Holten, The Reading: History of a Coal Age Empire, Vol. I the Nineteenth century, Laury's Station, Pennsylvania: Garrigues House, 1989, p. 131.
TrumpetBugleHorn 06:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richmond coal terminal 

message: I think it would be a good idea to include a section on the equipment of the reading, because i know the Pennsylvania Railroad's  page has a good section on their equipment and the reading deserves on as well
Included would be: Steam Locomotives(G1-G3, T1, M1, K1, I8-I10)  Diesel: (FT, F7, FP7, Rs-3, Geeps)
a section on passenger equipment would have RDCs, EMUs, and their wall street and crusader equiment  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannybrown1 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reading equipment 

message: I think that I'm going to add more to the 1924-1976 history section, but I am unsure if I sould include thew electrification in that section or creat its own section latter on?
mannybrown1
: Great idea, add a more detailed article reference under the section heading ... such as laid out in the style manual ... Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Section_organization Risk Engineer (talk) 11:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reading Company: 1924–1976 and electrification 

message: When the article Reading Entertainment is finally merged here, more infomation should be added so that it has a world wide view of the subject. Right now it just focusses on the US operations and completly ignore Australia or New Zealand. Also, it needs reliable refrences. --Klltr (talk) 07:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Wide View 

message: Roger SPUI. Within inches of each other under heading 'History' you see 'Rail Road', 'Railroad', and 'Railway' (in the illustration), with no explanation.
Identify, explain, and provide a table listing the names by which this road was known, and when.
Now, the listing of the presidents and their dates is more like it. Do you know how few of the other RR articles have that?
Cordially, Jim Luedke  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimlue (talk • contribs) 22:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it Rail Road, Railroad, or Railway? 

message: And for Pete's sake remove the hyperlinks that point to the very article we are reading. (Oops--sorry for the pun.)
Actually, this is not the writers' fault. Wikipedia could easily catch and prevent it. Since they didn't, is is an un-feature of their editing interface and they are to blame.--J.L. Jimlue (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree ..This article seems to be structured differently than other railroad articles with a number of self referencing or circular links... Risk Engineer (talk) 11:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autolinks 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: . Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mackensen (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Reading Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080923230410/http://www.readingrailroad.org:80/reading/rdg_history.html to http://www.readingrailroad.org/reading/rdg_history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This should really be a separate article ... the link is a circular reference ... I plan to develop a new article on this pioneer railroad ... Risk Engineer (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info ... Risk Engineer (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philadelphia Germantown and Norristown Railroad 

message: 1.  Don't cover a company's later period—double-tracking, vertical expansion, good old Archie McLeod, J. P. Morgan, etc.—and then start in on its history, rewinding to 1833.  I came to this article expressly to find the year the P&R opened and found myself scrolling, scouring, and scowling, up & down before I found it.  Sorry; make that:  I didn't find it, since you don't state it.
At the risk of being obvious, state everything in chronological order.  Except for, that is, if you want to start the History section with a quick overview (one which starts in 1833).
2. Caption "1833–73: Expansion" is duly Greta Garbled.  If 1833–1873 was the P&R's "expansion" period, how long and how far had it been running before it started "expanding" in "1833"?  Boy, I sure hope our troops guarded that road heavily to keep it out of British hands in the War of 1812.
Yours for a more un-garbled America,
Jimlue (talk) 21:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Point of order, Mr. Chairman