lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moreau Catholic High School

message: While Moreau is currently located next door to St. Clement, it started out on the parish grounds of St. Bede.  Calfan 19:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it has been added.(mercurywoodrose)66.80.6.163 (talk) 19:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Making a statement such as "Although Moreau's athletics program has not enjoyed a considerable reputation throughout the East Bay..." is opinion, not fact.  Given that Moreau has consistently placed volleyball, basketball, cross country and softball teams into the NCS playoffs, it also doesn't seem to be a very well informed opinion at that.  Calfan 19:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: no longer present, but still the current athletics data is unsourced. just the facts: "consistently placed" is just as weasely as "not enjoyed...".(mercurywoodrose)66.80.6.163 (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics

message: This article, notably the section "Acclaimed Observances" reads like an advertisement. The entire article is quite biased and should be changed to reflect a neutral viewpoint. -- Yagshemash 03:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed.(mercurywoodrose)66.80.6.163 (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed again.  This is now an encyclopedia article, not a PR piece.  Let's keep it that way. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement
Talk:MindTree Consulting

message: This page was previously deleted, but an article on the same subject (MindTree) has since been sourced and kept and so this page should be unprotected and made into a redirect to that article. Presumably this doesn't need to go through deletion review as I'm not asking for the restoration of the article, only the unprotecting of this alternate title for purposes of a redirect. Ziggurat 22:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable, done.--Commander Keane 08:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NeXTcube

message: The NeXTcube and the NeXT Cube were two different computers, and Tim Berners-Lee used a NeXT Cube. Wikifan42 22:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes - the original NeXT workstation was officially the "NeXT Computer" and was only colloquially known as "the cube". Only the second-generation '040 system was actually called the "NeXTcube". Letdorf 09:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with both of you (There is certainly a distinction between the two, even though they look similar and are easily mistaken for each other), and I think that the statement about the first http server currently on the page ("It is famous as the world's first Web Server, used by Sir Tim Berners-Lee at CERN to create the first web page on December 25th 1990.") should be removed immediately for inaccuracy.  My understanding is that the first web page/web server was on Tim Berners-Lee's "NeXT Computer" and NOT a "NeXTcube". --208.214.101.206 (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Letdorf (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NeXT Cube vs. NeXTcube

message: Is the cube really sufficiently different from the next computer to warrant a seperate page?
Considering how breif both pages are..they may as well be combined.
132.3.33.68 (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  consolodate?
Talk:Yurok Indian Reservation

message: I do think that Indian Reservations are notable but this article will need more info-namely those relating to the historical founding and any particular events that happened. 205.157.110.11 22:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grand Hotel Prishtina

message: This article probably doesn't have the best name, and should be called Grand Hotel Pristina perhaps.  --Xyzzyplugh 22:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

message: See the offical site of the Hotel. --Hipi Zhdripi 13:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got a point, Hipi Zhdripi. However does that not give you the right to go around insulting people and calling them names. It is very difficult to understand what you usually say most of the times. If you pointed out that the name of the hotel is different than the town and that needs to be changed, what do you expect people to do? The way that you have changed the articles is not good as the Edit History is lost.I have requested a revert. Please note that there is a survey going on about the city name at Talk:Priština. Regards, E  Asterion u talking to me? 16:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offical name is Grand Hotel Prishtina 

message: ::Now you see from the photos that its name is Prishtina, don't you? Majuru (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So if you both agree that it's Grand Hotel Prishtina then why are you again on ANI?.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 16:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of Lorenc Antoni activity. Nothing here. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 17:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012 move
Talk:Victoria High School (British Columbia)

message: Victoria High School (British Columbia)#History, Central Middle School was really known as Victoria Junior Highschool when I lived in Victoria, British Columbia. 4 out of my 5 younger siblings attended it. Peter Horn User talk 12:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: See Middle school#Canada Peter Horn User talk 12:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Make that Victoria Junior High School Peter Horn User talk 12:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A name 

message: I'm suggesting to add this to the article since it's missing, and the link is found here:
The Government of B.C. is providing $77.1 million for seismic upgrades and a 200-seat expansion of Victoria High to keep students safe and ensure they are not attending an overcrowded school. Construction on the upgrades and expansion at Vic High is expected to begin in August 2020. Students will be re-located to a renovated SJ Willis while the project is underway. Brandcr (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent renovation (2020)
Talk:Masella

message: Possible advertisment spam205.157.110.11 22:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's spam, in the sense it was created by someone associated with the resort (instead, it seems to have been created by an otherwise-genuine contributor). However, I do question whether its sufficiently notable for inclusion or as its own article- this could probably be eligible for deletion per criterion of not asserting notability.--cjllw | TALK 00:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Agility (RuneScape)

message: This page currently is copied directly from http://kbase.runescape.com/viewarticle.ws?article_id=1908. This page also violates to an extreme degree the policy on WP:NOT where it says: ...This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, video game guides, and recipes... Hyenaste (tell) 05:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:North Carolina Highway 150

message: Interstate 73 is open from John Bryan Blvd to US-220 Map794 (talk) 03:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 73 

message: Exit 116 on I-73 is complete and open. 68taileddragon (talk) 20:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchange with I-73
Talk:Goffs Oak

message: no-one who lives in or near goffs oak puts the apostrophe in the name. to have the redirect away from the correct version (goffs oak) to this incorrect one (goff's oak) is a misrepresentation. if there are no objections i will return this page to its original location.
Rich 22:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ordnance Survey, surely the people who know these things, have used "Goff's Oak" from 1882 to the present day. See Goff's Oak on Bing Maps (OS View). Alansplodge (talk) 21:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No the OS are not the arbitrators of correctness on this they just reprint maps until someone tells them otherwise. If you check Broxbourne BC here or Goffs Oak Community Association here or Goffs Oak School here or the library website here there is no apostophe. In fact I am yet to find any organisation which uses the Goff's Oak spelling. If you look for Goff's Oak on Wikipedia there is a redirect to this article anyway. Tmol42 (talk) 00:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: "Can be spelled with or without the apostrophe"? Come on, there's either a right way or wrong way of spelling it. - Dudesleeper  Talk 01:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ordnance Survey, surely the people who know these things, have used "Goff's Oak" from 1882 to the present day. See Goff's Oak on Bing Maps (OS View). Alansplodge (talk) 21:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No the OS are not the arbitrators of correctness on this they just reprint maps until someone tells them otherwise. If you check Broxbourne BC here or Goffs Oak Community Association here or Goffs Oak School here or the library website here there is no apostophe. In fact I am yet to find any organisation which uses the Goff's Oak spelling. If you look for Goff's Oak on Wikipedia there is a redirect to this article anyway. Tmol42 (talk) 00:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophe 
Talk:North Carolina Highway 24

message: What made you decide what was an important junction and what was not? Delete the rest but keep US 52?
:Making the infobox a reasonable size and listing reasonably-sized towns - basically combining the lists of junctions and cities. --SPUI (T - C) 05:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a bad idea. --TinMan 18:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: So I completed the Junction list for NC 24 and, as I feared I would, I have a discrepancy on the miles against the stated official mileage listed on page. The method I used was Google maps, which gave me a total of 278 miles; the listed official mileage came from another website which may or may not be accurate anymore (given the likely chance the route has changed since it's calculations... they had 284.  So in all, I'm off 6 miles.  So the question, do we leave everything as is or do we adjust one of the numbers to be like the other?  I would lean towards changing the official number to the Junction list mileage I did (I welcome anyone that can replicate on Google maps and/or use a different mapping website).  Of course, if I missed something or made a mistake, please correct it please, thank you.  -WashuOtaku (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mileage discrepancy

message: Okay, now that we've merged W.T. Harris Boulevard (Charlotte, North Carolina) into this article, let's find a way to add the content from it here. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  21:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  W.T. Harris Boulevard
Category talk:Disasters by year

message: I suggest to create a table with the following columns:
Year
Type of Disaster
Number of Casualties (accurate or estimation)
Number of Injuries (accurate or estimation)
Comments
Maybe we could create a similar table with wars, famines, epidemics, revolutions, ecological degradation, etc.
An analysis like this could be a more ordered approach to see wheter or not catastrophic prophecies and claims that these kind of calamities are increasing, is there a real trend the last years or is it just that the world is better informed than in the past?
See for yourselves the prophecies and chastisements announced in this page www.christinagallagher.org
:This sounds like an idea for an article, wikibook or separate project. The table itself would be interesting, but using it for "trend analysis" of the Nostradamus type is a silly idea. Using it to say sensible things would be OK, but I fear that too many people will junp on the "End of Days" bandwagon instead. Your comment "or is it just that the world is better informed" hits it on the head I think. That would be probably be the ultimate result of such an analysis, and wouldn't tell us much more than what we suspect already. A lot of effort to confirm an intuitive result. Carcharoth 14:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PS. Not only are we better informed, but there are more of us, and more of us living in the wrong places, where natural disasters will increasingly affect us. Carcharoth 14:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Redfox (comics)

message: I originally created a website about Redfox back in the mid-90s, with some assistance from Fox and Chris Bell, but it's been off the web for years. As I get around to it, I'll transfer some of the contents here. Mark Grant 22:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would still need sourcing, do you have the URL of the old site? Perhaps think about grabbing some space and putting it up somewhere new? (Emperor (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redfox
Talk:United States Army Forces Command

message: Removed from immediate attention list. Could use some work, but not in IMMEDIATE need of attention.
Buckshot06 10:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be excellent if someone would translate this Military jargon into plain English. I get the gist: USAFC channels troops and resources to overseas battlegrounds. But an honest, objective look at the process whereby this takes place (and how the function of this organization has evolved since the Cold War) would be be very valuable.
Jperrylsu (talk) 02:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: In-Universe Language

message: Although the V Corps main headquarters is located in Kentucky, it is under the operational control of USAREUR-AF (https://www.europeafrica.army/units/). V Corps should be removed from the list of FORSCOM subordinate units. V Corps has no interaction with and does not report to FORSCOM. 162.13.154.82 (talk) 17:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  V Corps higher headquarters is US Army Europe and Africa
Talk:North Carolina Highway 6

message: Just wanted to point out that NC appears to have decommissioned NC 6 west of US 29. They've greened-out all but one NC 6 sign for the exit from I-40 and removed the NC 6 signs along the route on Patterson Ave.
If someone would/could find a map online to show this, then it would be easier to put this into the article...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.76.224.163 (talk) 03:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone find a reason why this route was removed? I can easily guess, but it would be nice if there was something written. --Triadian (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truncate
Talk:Dario Šimić

message: ...was born in 1833, which makes him 142 years older than Dario Šimić, so it is quite improbable that he was his grandfather. Grand-grand-grandfather, perhaps? GregorB 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrijica Šimić...

message: Just about every other source says he was born on 12 Nov. What's your source for 21 Nov...?
All the best,
Cris Freddi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.193.152 (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well his official website says he was born on 21 November and I assume that was the source used. However it is probably a typo as just aout every other credible source lists him as being born on 12 Nov. Timbouctou 08:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date
Talk:Elf Aquitaine

message: I removed the statement that
:This has come under fire pre-Iraqi 2003 war. This also dissproves many conspiracy theories about Haliburton's involvement with Iraqi Oil fields.
The statement fails to explain how Elf Aquitaine's relationship to the pre-2003 Iraqi government has any bearing on the accusations against Halliburton, nor does it link to the page that documents the accusations. Furthermore, the statement that Elf's relationship "disproves" the conspiracy theories about Halliburton is, of course, a POV statement, besides lacking a clear causal link.  Whether any accusation is proven or refuted is in the mind of the reader and constitutes POV; a statement reporting the known facts is acceptable. — JonRoma 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed POV comment 
Talk:United States Army Special Operations Command

message: Maybe I'm just an old sourpuss now, but I find that the emojis of the different Beret flashes detract from the article. MechanoidWarhead (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it to be just the opposite.  Each of these subordinate units wear the same SSI and the only distinguishing device they have to identify their unit from the rest is their beret flash.  Calling out these beret flashes is nice and also provides a visual cue as to where in the paragraph that unit is mentioned/discussed.  I don't know where you get the idea that these are somehow "emojis," that is a strange thing to call a unit's heraldic item. --McChizzle (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Are the Emojis Really Necessary?

message: you need to cool it.  is not a "troll" and you didn't "correct" anything, you summarily undid a significant amount of work he put into the article. If you had bothered to check, you'd see he is long-time contributor, with 10 years and almost 12,000 edits, who regularly edits US Army articles. You had no business undoing that work. You are like a bull in china shop. You've been here like 5 minutes and you have A LOT to learn. So start learning and stop interfering. You can start here. - wolf 23:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: was trying to correct User:157.100.249.59, not McChizzle's edit, but clicked on edit while on an older version of the page. Just check the personnel number you reverted to. Preach to me after you make sure you didn't make a mistake as well mr seniot editor. Belevalo (talk) 23:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't have to be a "senior editor" to know how to use the preview button. It's like, literally one of the very first things you should be doing, and you should be using it with every. single. edit. you make, without fail. That's how you avoid needless disruption, like you caused here, and especially how to avoid baselessly attacking an editor in good standing, like you did here. You owe McChizzle an apology. - wolf 23:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: didn't attack McChizzle. I was refering to IP user 157.100.249.59. Belevalo (talk) 20:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: But it was McChizzle that you reverted and was it McChizzle that you also called a troll. Heaven forbid you take any responsibility, or even acknowledge, when you screw up. I think we're done here. - wolf 01:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enough already  

message: What is promotional about this article? Neutraliano (talk) 13:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional?
Talk:Dragon Fighter

message: Dragon Fighter is a Scifi Thriller 2003 Film directed by Phil Roth who directed the 
sequel to Pythons. This may refer to Reign of Fire about dragons being in the present.
I like this movie since it is a UFO produced film. Sure there are many mess-ups in the movie but it is still good to watch. I still wish the dragon was slightly bigger instead of being the size of a rhino and that the producers didn't use mulit-screen shots. To anybody out there, if there are errors or mistakes in the plot, please fix them and if the plot sounds too long, try to make it a little shorter. Just don't change it completly, since I wrote the entire plot by myself and it took a very long time to finish it but I am still proud of my work.Johnny542 23:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Those were F-16s, not F/A-18s. They were single engine, single tail fighters, not the twin engine twin tail of the hornet
BubbaYoshi (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary error
Talk:Narrative hook

message: This article is such a jewel that I hate to even suggest modifying it, but:
A hook that is outside the scope of a narrative hook is a good title for a work.  (And of course nowadays you can extend that to cover art and the various bits of text put on covers of books.)  Since an interesting title is often the first thing draws someone to examine a work that they know nothing about, and it is at least literary if not narrative, mention of this should perhaps be added to this article.  - Hga 22:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles as hooks
Talk:Low Rhenish

message: Sorry, but there is no such term as Low Rhinic: it is not used in English-language scholarship on German dialects; a Google search shows 19 hits, all of which seem to be derived from this article. --Pfold 22:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAICT the usual English terms is "Low Rhenish". Still only 58 Google hits, but it isn't something discussed much in English. I'm moving it now. Angr 21:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This article is using far too much weasel words and incorect terms. The claims of mutual intelligibility "far surpassing national borders" and the use of "Low Germanic" are just some examples.Rex 18:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for you, Rex, but you are wrong. It is an empirical fact that people even from the Belgian province of Limburg can use their native vernacular meeting dialect users from the entire Düsseldorf District. What arguments do you have to deny this? If your possible other objections are comparably ill-founded, your opinions on this subject are much more incorrect and speculative than mine. It doesn't help you to use strong overall disqualifications, rather than detailed arguments. Ad43 21:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On wikipedia it doesnt matter what arguments users who question information have, but which information the users supporting the information have. Do you have the supporting sources, and do they use weasel words as well? Rex 21:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I could discuss all your points and convincingly, I trust, if you could only articulate them. Ad43 21:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculative and incorrect 

message: Removing fact tags and unreferenced templates isn't cleaning up. Provide references and inline citations.Rex 10:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: References and inline citations have been provided by various editors. Rex, stop pushing you private POV here - and elsewhere.-- Matthead discuß!     O       21:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cleaning up"

message: This article should be merged with Meuse-Rhenish, as the articles are coextensive. Sarcelles (talk) 21:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. They only partly overlap. Meuse-rhenish is also found in Belgium and the Netherlands. Ad43 (talk) 11:51, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this article, Low Rhenish is not only spoken in Germany. Sarcelles (talk) 13:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly, neither article has got much linguistic information about these varieties. I suppose merging might increase the chances that someone will cite some linguistic evidence to justify all this boundary drawing. --Pfold (talk) 16:28, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meuse-Rhenish