Talk:Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: In this the excessive editting of the page makes it all but unreadable. As I belive his edits are disruptive to the quality of this article, and not based on a true desire to improve this article, I think I am/have reverting/reverted his edits. For those wondering w hy I am not assuming good faith on his part see:Request for Mediation
ANd:
Request for Arbitration
I am NOT attempting to attack or insult him. And this article could use some improvement. But excessive notices at the top of the article won't help. Instead, I've replaced them with a request for an expert in the field.Kairos (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the cleanup tags as there has been no attempt to effect any form of cleanup other than the addtition of two more cleanup tags (this must be a record for a D&D article). I think a more constructive proposal is to merge this article into Lady of Pain as I would imagine it will be impossible to provide evidence of this fictional location.--Gavin Collins (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

text: *I am not sure why you are doing this, as the article does not cite any sources at all. I could understand the removal of the notability template from a topic of marginal notability, but this article has no reliable secondary sources ate all. From the edit history, it appears you never edited this article until now, so I must question your removal of cleanup templates - is this something you feel you must do because of the arbitration case? Or is it because you don't want any improvement to be made to this article? --Gavin Collins (talk) 07:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than questioning the motives of other editors or using weasal words like "marginal" to describe an article which I haven't contributed to, I'll be adding sources to the article over the next week as work allows. I've got to demonstrate some surgical procedures over the next few days in the lab, but as I can handle it, I'll work on putting in sources (and if you're patient, some in-line citations as I feel them to be needed). I'm reasonably capable of handling that 'request for an expert' tag on the article. There are tons of sources to add, including probably some secondary ones (this article and the one on the Lady of Pain are in and of themselves the two major spin-off articles from the article on the demonstrably notable (award winning) Planescape setting. In the meantime, let's be patient and avoid the ultimatums please. They don't help anyone.Shemeska (talk) 08:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dealing with Gavin.collins? 

message: The image :Image:Pgp 007 01.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Pgp 007 01.jpg

message: The article quotes one of the creators saying Sigil's factions were created in response to Vampire: The Masquerade being a popular game and having clans.  But Sigil was first published in 1989 and V:tM wasn't published until 1991.  Not only is it unlikely that they heard much about V:tM pre-publishing, but it's impossible for it to have been a popular game, isn't it?  This may be how the creator remembers it, but it isn't true and should be removed (or at least mentioned that it's not accurate).  I'll remove or change it in a few days unless someone does it first or gives me a compelling reason not to. - 67.187.245.98 (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigil and Planescape were first published in 1994. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 17:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080925110722/http://www.planewalker.com:80/planar-basics/sigil-venues-database/the-sigil-papers-and-map/the-sigil-papers-and-map to http://www.planewalker.com/planar-basics/sigil-venues-database/the-sigil-papers-and-map/the-sigil-papers-and-map
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5iqx3F0o7?url=http://www.montecook.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi?arch_lineos39 to http://www.montecook.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi?arch_lineos39
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified