lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Umbri

message: I really like all the specific information regarding archaeological sites and religion. It's interesting that they found a record of their sacrifices, and the links to archaeological sites is really interesting. It would be nice to have a little more information on their political system if possible. I was also wondering in what ways did the Umbri maintain their heritage even though they were conquered? Maybe write a sentence or two on that.
Alegrimstad 00:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like all that information also. This is an outstanding opportunity to put it in. Get busy.Dave (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Babatha

message: This is a very nicely created article. I'm very impressed by your research - only one suggestion I can offer is to divide up the life section into subheadings, just to provide a bit of space in that big set of paragraphs. Perhaps something related to her married life, then to her history in the revolt? Another possibility is to see if any of her ancestry is available - that is always a good resource, especially to determine how long her family has been upperclass. Other than those two points, very nice job! - Eugenia Gabrielov 129.105.4.184 15:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are the letters written in Greek? It seems so from the image, but the resolution is too low to really make it out. Please add information on the language if you have it. -- 77.7.177.33 (talk) 10:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I realise that this question is now five years old, but I thought I would reply for the benefit of anyone who was likewise curious and happened upon this talk page. The only imaged documents that I can find appear to be in Aramaic. That includes the one pictured. When I have time, I'll see if I can find a reliable source that talks about the language(s) used in depth... One that directly addresses the question, as I would suspect that not all of them are in Aramaic, given that some of the legal documents would involve Roman administrators- but given that they likely used Aramaic in documents of the local courts, it is indeed possible that all of them are in that language. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language?
Talk:The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design

message: Blogs are not reliable sources, especially that one. They're even less reliable than Wikipedia (which is a difficult accomplishment). Hence... I'm removing the "Panda's thumb."
DarthSidious 09:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blogs
Talk:Goodpasture syndrome

message: Is there any citation for this statement, which seems counterintuitive: "and these infections may result in a worsening of the primary disease". It's not clear that infections will actually exacerbate circulating anti-GBM antibodies or autoimmune response to the GBM. I have removed that clause pending some kind of citation for this. Derek Balsam 00:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment

message: It is type 2 noncytotoxic, correct? Tkjazzer 20:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  type 2 cytotoxic vs noncytotoxic 

message: - 2001 early treatment seems to be good. JFW | T@lk 19:23, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early treatment 

message: Anti-GBM disease is not equal to Goodpasture's syndrome. Here is a quote from Harrison's: "Patients who develop autoantibodies directed against glomerular basement antigens frequently develop a glomerulonephritis termed antiglomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease. When they present with lung hemorrhage and glomerulonephritis, they have a pulmonary-renal syndrome called Goodpasture's syndrome." Anti-GBM disease can be part of Goodpasture's syndrome but can also present on its own. This distinction should be made more clear, especially as many patients with Anti-GBM disease might get wrongfully worried about their lungs (thinking they have Goodpasture's).
--Bastilleday uky (talk) 03:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Other sources use the terms interchangeably, and the antigen is exactly the same in all three locations (kidney, lungs, and blood-brain barrier).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Bastilleday uky. The antigen might be the same, but in Goodpasture's syndrome these antigens injure the lungs too, while in Goodpasture's disease they damage only the kidneys. From Robbins: "Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Antibody (Type I) Crescentic Glomerulonephritis Anti-GBM antibody crescentic glomerulonephritis, or type I CrGN, is characterized by linear deposits of IgG and, in many cases, C3 on the GBM, as described above. In some of these individuals the anti-GBM antibodies also bind to pulmonary alveolar capillary basement membranes to produce the clinical picture of pulmonary hemorrhages associated with renal failure. These persons are said to have Goodpasture syndrome, to distinguish their condition from so-called idiopathic cases in which renal involvement occurs in the absence of pulmonary disease. Anti-GBM antibodies are present in the serum and are helpful in diagnosis. It is important to recognize type I CrGN because these individuals benefit from plasmapheresis, which removes pathogenic antibodies from the circulation."--B@xter9 13:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-GBM disease
Talk:Canonical basis

message: The page doesn't strike me as a disambig page. I think it should focus on the representation-theory aspect. -- Taku (talk) 15:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a disambiguation page; this is a regular article about the subject.—Anita5192 (talk) 02:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page?
Talk:Canonical bundle

message: There is more to say about canonical curves, a well-studied subject. In due course it will worth putting this on its own page, with a summary left here. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Trying to check a key formula here. The space of quadratic differentials has dimension 3g - 3. The monomials of degree 2 in a basis of the differentials of the first kind number g(g + 1)/2. The difference works out at (g - 2)(g - 3)/2, which should therefore be the dimension of the quadrics through the curve. I think. Therefore if I'm reading Eisenbud's notation correctly, the index of the binomial coefficient is shifted one. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Canonical curves
File talk:7Q5.jpg

message: How can the image be public-domain? The Dead Sea scrolls were only discovered in 1947 or later, so the image must still be covered by the originator's copyright unless the image has explicitly been placed in the public domain, or if it originated in a jurisdiction where the term of copyright is unusually short.EEye 00:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PD image??

message: I strongly recommend to review the license of this file due to the incompatibility with the observation Observation from the English Wikipedia: This image is in the public domain because its copyright has expired in the United States and those countries with a copyright term of no more than the life of the author plus 100 years. Original Photograph from "The First New Testament" by David Estrada & William White, Jr. Photograph by David Rubinger, 1972. Photograph used with permission of Thomas Nelson, Inc.
--Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 03:03, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:7Q5.jpg
Talk:Sempronius Asellio

message: You did a good job on who Sempronius Asellio is on a general level, but more details need to be added. Explain more about his command under Africanus. If he was a prominent author explain more about the importance of his works. Also a few minor points: follow wikipedia's editing guide (for instance bolding the name when it's first introduced, and adding links for people mentioned, etc.), also for clarity/specific purposes, explain "apodictic style," among other ambiguous things.
Alegrimstad 00:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ceffyl Dŵr

message: I've moved the page to its correct spelling. I'd like to know the source for the details in this article. There are a few references to otherworldly horses associated with water in Welsh folklore but I can't recall or find (at the moment) anything with the details provided here. I'm not sure how widespread the name Ceffyl Dŵr was either, but it's a perfectly good Welsh name (but not as "Ceffyl-Dwr"!). Enaidmawr 00:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dreamscape (chat)

message: While this initial entry about Dreamscape is wonderful to see, it doesn't capture the true wonder of a virtual community that is so much more than just CHAT. 
I was active in Dreamscape for about five years, even serving in the capacity of remote staff for a time.  Though I no longer devote as much time to Dreamscape as I once did, I still regularly communicate with friends I met there.  Outside of the online realm there are real life 'gatherings' that have occurred both domestically and internationally-  I'm proud to have met the people behind the avatars on several occasions. 
Are there those to whom this virtual world is nonsense and all a game?  Yes. 
Conversely there are many who truly call Dreamscape home and carry memories of events experienced and friendships gained for the rest of their days. I am proud to have been a part of Dreamscape's first ten years and hope to see it celbrate many more years of success. 
Joscelin 00:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trinity Monastery (Chernihiv)

message: Why does the Ukrainian name of this monastery contain the name "Illinsky," yet the text of the current version of this article does not mention the name "Illinsky" even a single time?  That doesn't seem very encyclopedic. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illinsky
Talk:Disgustipated

message: A six beat?? Ahh it's killing me that he said that. It's definitely four. Nothing we can do haha Wikidan829 00:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The Deletion did not follow standard procedure. The person who nominated it failed to follow through with a formal discussion or reason. No discussion EVER occured. The song is of importance due to its hidden nature, mystique and discussion involved with it. Are you telling me that Wikipedia laws can just be ignored? Please re-submit the tag and go through the process again stating why the article should be deleted rather than purging it. Thank you very much. Klichka (talk) 04:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A discussion did take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hush (Tool song). Disgustipated was included in the AFD for Hush, along with many other songs. Hidden songs are not notable for being hidden (not that Disgustipated is hidden).  The songs mystique and discussion involved with it may make it notable but that information was in the article when the AFD took place so hasn't changed anything since then. What laws do you think have been ignored? Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that there was no discussion on the talk page, other people said so. Ideally you are supposed to put discussion on the talk page of the article as to why you are nominating it. I saw nothing at all related to this and beings that I was trying to find specific information on the song via wikipedia and that the song is rather famous among Tool fans, I believed that beauacracy ignored the other side of the discussion and that ignorance lead to the downfall of the article, not valid points. Klichka (talk) 05:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion Invalid
Talk:Non-contact force

message: The article says, "Gravity, the force of attraction that exists among all bodies that have mass. The force exerted on each body by the other through weight is proportional to the mass of the first body times the mass of the second body divided by the square of the distance between them".  That explanation is Newtonian, accepted by mainstream physicists to be false.  It is useful epistemically—a law to predict humans' own observations simply as human knowledge—but even then only within the everyday range of experience.  Newton's theory is considered by physicists not useful ontically—to explain the natural world's causal, mechanical structure.  This is not to say that gravitation is a contact force, but simply that the article's claim—Newton's action at a distance—was overturned by Einstein
In general theory of relativity, mass does not attract mass.  Instead, mass associates with warped space and time, but so does energy, too, how gravitation and acceleration share a mechanism.  Simply, the mass/energy associates with the "curvature" of the surface of 4D spacetime, so that the body experiences a free fall at light speed along a straight line—a geodesic or world line—which is simply the single pathway of least resistance upon the "curved" surface of 4D spacetime.  At high mass, however, an entity contracts 4D spacetime mostly along the time dimension.  A body traveling at light speed in a vacuum experiences maximal rate of motion through 3D space but no evolution of events along 1D time—the shape of the three spatial dimensions have "curved" into a world line concealing the time dimension—whereas a body at rest in 3D space experiences maximal rate of unfolding of events, all its "motion" in a free fall along a world line fully along the 1D time axis, as all three spatial dimensions are concealed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.40.104 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sentence of the Gravity article seems to match up quite well with the description for gravitation here. Also, this article isn't meant just for physics experts and doesn't need to be at the bleeding edge of scientific theory. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Newton's laws are still taught as valid theory, which is more than good enough for Wikipedia. I don't see a good reason to change it. -- Fyrefly  (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article describes gravitation falsely
Talk:Joint decision trap

message: I've just made a rather large edit and thought I would explain some of my reasoning:
I've removed the first quote because it is nothing more than a publisher's blurb. The second quote was deleted as it appeared not to reflect upon the subject.
The Unless otherwise directed under 'See also' was removed as a redlink.
The rest of the edits concerned the removal of amazon links and minor WP:MOS issues. Victoriagirl 01:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: It sounds terrific, but what precisely is meant with "to take a decision at the lowest common denominator?" Iterator12n  Talk  03:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning?
Talk:Harold F. Youngblood

message: Is he of Swedish descent? The last name Youngblood would be a straightforward americanization of the Swedish last name Ljungblad  which is very common.
No, he was not.  His dad was from a part of Germany close to France.  And his mom was French-Irish. Trust me, I'm his grandson.  I didn't write this article, though.  Just to add, he was a hilarious old fart.  He would have a beer or two every night, but his beer stein held a quart of beer.  During a debate, his opponent dropped a flask of whiskey, my grandfather (Opa as we called him) kicked it back to him and said "here, you're gonna need this when I'm through with you."  He also thought it was illegal to publish the word Fart in a book.  And the funny part is, he was never joking when he said anything funny.  Also, he was catholic, but when he was drinking, he'd pull out his hankerchief and start dancing singing Ja ja ja ja, Mazeltov.  He's think he was jewish when he got drunk. He did so many funny things, It'd take hours to write the funniest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.98.49 (talk) 00:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ehlerange

message: I (with my limited French) can only find one (unconfirmed) source for the population of Ehlerange. It doesn't seem to be individually listed on any Sanem or Luxembourg census data. If someone more capable than I could help out I'd appreciate it.
Sophia(θ pr′me) 19:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Caplock mechanism

message: Are there any sources that refer to "cap n ball" systems as Caplock? I've always heard them referred to as Percussion. --Philip Laurence (talk) 00:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any sources? 

message: The article has much overlap which Percussion cap. Anyone editing here should take care what information should go into which article. Maybe even a merger would be a good idea... --BjKa (talk) 11:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap 

message: The article says the caplock system was patented in 1807, but the link to mercuy fulminate says it wasn't used in firearms until after 1830.  Is this correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.137.134.50 (talk) 14:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In a nutshell.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 15:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention of Mercury Fulminate
Talk:Heckler & Koch HK45

message: If someone has a free photo of the HK45 with similar quality to the current, non-free one (side profile, clean background), could you please replace the current one with it? Thank you. Hayden120 07:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I can get that, but it would be better if someone could photograph their own firearm and upload it under a free-licence. Hayden120 (talk) 09:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: This may have been one of the weapons used in the 2011 Seal Beach shooting, but the sourcing is unclear.. Is this the likely meaning of "Heckler & Koch .45"?--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 09:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but that would not be worth noting in the article anyway, at this point. ROG5728 (talk) 09:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Seal Beach shooting 
Talk:Knight's Armament Company Masterkey

message: I am removing the Delta Force use as the weapons design does not match the information given.Paulwharton 16:11, 08 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delta Force Use
Talk:KPV heavy machine gun

message: At 14.5x115mm (58% the diameter and 83 the overall length of the NATO standard 25×137mm), can you REALLY call this a "machinegun"? It's getting a little heavy for that, this really is an autocannon by all reasonable measures. That teh Russians called it a machinegun when it was in use is hardly realevant, considering their history of outright lying about what they were up to and when.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.249.85 (talk) 05:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: With regard to the first comment above, I'm no genius, but I do believe that cannons fire shells and machine-guns fire bullets. Since this baby does, indeed, fire bullets (however large they may be) it is a machine-gun.--172.130.3.100 (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machingun? REALLY? 

message: Saw an Afghan National Police member mention the Taliban having 'Zikoyaks' in a Vice episode, and a quick google suggests it refers to the KPV. What I can't find is if it's a single gun or a specific configuration (for example a quad AA mount on the back of a truck). Any idea where this nickname comes from and what exactly it refers to? -- MiG (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Zikoyak" 

message: Currently much of the description of the use of the weapon as a naval armament is taken up by a discussion of the Gulf of Tonkin incident. While certainly to do with the KPV would it not be better to move this into a larger section covering the various wars and actions the weapon has been used in? 82.39.250.199 (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service Record
Talk:FB Tantal

message: Hello, what's the best AK-74 clone? Could anyone compare AK-74 and Tantal? Is there any difference in quality, accuracy, reliability or anything like that?
Thanks.
--hrd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.141.0.146 (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:FB Beryl

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: I propose we merge Kbk wz. 1996 Mini-Beryl into this article. It appears to be a carbine variant of this rifle, with few other differences. Rezin (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing for lack of support over 2.5 years (and with page move on target). Klbrain (talk) 15:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kbk wz. 1996 Mini-Beryl 

message: Is this feature retained from the Tantal  or not? I've looked up pictures of the Beryl and I've seen models with or without the burst fire mechanism on the left side of the receiver. 70.190.137.61 (talk) 06:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Tantal Burst Fire Feature
Talk:Kbsp wz. 1938M

message: : "In April 2017, serial number 1048 was acquired at auction by the Polish government for $69,000."
So is this the deactivated example mentioned on the sentence? 91.10.41.142 (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish Example 

message: Hey, could someone change the in service from 1938-to present to something more sensible like 1938-1939? There are like 8 or 9 of these rifles that still exist and only two of them are in Poland and I can certainly guarantee you that they are in museum's rather than in active service. 81.161.204.84 (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies in the article
Talk:Waterford, Pennsylvania

message: moved this from article to talk Dincher 01:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I took a photo of Waterford from a plane a few years ago when I was flying in to Erie. Would that be of any value to add to the article, or would that be overcrowding it with images? TornadoLGS (talk) 20:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerial photo
Talk:Jarrah Forest

message: Hesperian, your re-wording is an improvement.  But I rather suspect that due to 150 years of preferential logging, Marri now dominates Jarrah in the overstorey of the remaining forested areas.  You think??  Callophylla 13:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably, good point. :-) Hesperian 23:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jarrah dominant 