lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:DeadAIM

message: Randomly came across this page, I wonder if it should be deleted now... super not-relevant anymore, or it could be rolled into another AIM-related page?
Biggest resource and citation I'd love to find is about JDennis selling DeadAIM to AOL, which I could not find.
I was able to find this archived critique of DeadAIM, but it's not source-worthy:
* Reasons Not to Buy DeadAIM - How JDennis.net has been scamming you all along  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickgray (talk • contribs) 18:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 2020 Updates

message: Vote against future deletions :) Mathiastck 18:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: vfd

message: The "Criticism" section added today seems heavily POV and has no cites. I've removed it from the main article and pasted it here, so if anyone wants to work on it they can bring it up to scratch here then merge it back in if appropriate. Jamse 18:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section
Template talk:Merge

message: :==Preposition to merge an item==
: It appears that the article List of Lithuanian monarchs (Wikipedia item ID: Q111379094), along with its counterpart in French, should be merged with another set of articles (Wikipedia item ID: Q2639920) where currently an article in English does not exist. --SeriousThinker (talk) 13:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:   Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template . Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is a redirect, Grand Duke of Lithuania, here in the English Wikipedia, so there is no need to merge. If there is material from another-language Wikipedia with which to create the Grand Duke article here that might be a good way to go. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 14:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 17 August 2022 

message: Description of suggested change:
make the example something normal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael21107 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? You'll need to be much more specific about what exactly you want changed for this to get implemented. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: the example says a page that has not been specified. If you are the editor who added this template, please specify....would be good to have it a normal example Michael H (talk) 19:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The example at the top is exactly what the template renders as when given no parameters. This is standard practice in template namespace and should not be changed without a good reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:37, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

text: apologies for not signing, i forget Michael H (talk) 19:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 1 August 2023 

message: By default,  produces output that reads "(Discuss)" if you don't specify a  value;  doesn't have this issue. I'm guessing that we should have them do the same thing. I would surmise that the best thing to do in both cases (though it might use different code in the two templates) is include a link to the talk page of the merge-to target, since that is the default location to discuss any merge.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Merge to]] display issue 

message: This whole family of templates are unhelpfully displaying "Proposed since .", when no  value has been specified. This entire item should probably just be suppressed in such a case (and a bot will date-fix it later anyway; there's no reason for it to be ugly and confusing in the short interim).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date display issue (in all these templates)
Talk:Earth Magnetism

message: From VfD:
Assuming it's not copyvio, I listed it here, despite its being brand new, because the title doesn't match the body in any way.  The article is about a very odd, fringe possibility.  If we had What can a meteor do to earth magnetism and is it possible that the megafaunal extinctions were affected by such an event, ok. Geogre 18:06, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elements/Archive 2

message: I have self-nominated Titanium to be Brilliant prose in order to find out what still 
needs to be done to improve that entry (which is, IMO, the most up-to-date based on what
I want a WikiProject Elements article to be). Please add suggestions for improvement at 
Wikipedia:Brilliant prose candidates#Current self-nominations (need to be seconded). --mav 20:26, 11 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titanium nominated for Brilliant prose. Is it brilliant yet?
Talk:Budapest Honvéd FC

message: Hi Anwell Perry,
Please note that Honvéd is not a suburb of Budapest but a Hungarian word for a soldier (literally defender of the homeland.
This football team is connected with Kispest, an independent locality until 1950. Since then, it has been District XIX of Budapest. I'll correct your entry accordingly. 
--Linkoman 18:20, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Can someone add an entry for Genito, due he's a full international for Mocambique? Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.97.102.214 (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genito 

message: Removed 3 sections relating to the addition of Joseph Kusztor as notable ex-player. That name had a red link and nothing came up relating to Honved when a Google search was made of the name. Obvious vandalism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.152.19.237 (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undid vandalism by 202.177.218.51 
Talk:Vanessa Kerry

message: She is affiliated faculty of HMS, as is everyone who is a physician at any of the teaching hospitals that are affiliated with Harvard. This is distinct from being on the faculty. Not to minimize her role at MGH, but Harvard has 146 tenure-track and tenured faculty. The affiliated number 11,000. http://hms.harvard.edu/about-hms/hms-affiliates  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.79.250.209 (talk) 02:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: HMS Faculty

message: This article was redirected to Kerry her father and her sister wasn't. so I think she is notable enough to have an article, even if her independent accomplishments, in and off themselves, borderline noterity, but she obviously was in public stage b/c of her father's campaign and role.--Mikerussell 22:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just did a fairly straightforward WP:GOCE review and edit. NO CONTENT or SOURCES were removed, it was a simple cut and past with the addition of the some sections for clarity and consistency with other BLP articles. For non-U.S. Readers, I added some context as to who John Kerry is in the Lead, otherwise the article contains pretty much what it started with prior to my efforts. Regards, --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2015 GOCE edit
Talk:Italian Navy (disambiguation)

message: rasmusdf: Nice cleanup Grunt. I will try to flesh out the article a bit more in the coming days. --rasmusdf 18:35, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: How can you say that "The Italian Navy is considered to be the 5th or 6th most powerful navy in the European Union. The Marina Militare also has minor Blue water capabilities though rarely operates out side of Europe." LOL
With 2 aircraft carriers LOL only three countries in the world have more than 1 aircraft carriers, and 10 FREMM frigates LOL  
How can you say that "The Marina Militare also has minor Blue water capabilities though rarely operates out side of Europe" when in 10 days The Nave Cavour has reached haiti LOL
:I agree with you; the Marina Militare, with two aircraft carriers and severals destroyers is commonly involved in NATO operations in Blue waters, so I removed this part of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.0.222.49 (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ERRATA CORRIGE 

message: I do believe that in the modern Marina Militare, the hulls below the waterline are constructed from transparent materials so as to facilitate visual perception of the earlier Marina Militare.
72.82.179.43 (talk) 12:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Specialized Construction
Talk:Bourbon whiskey

message: Someone just changed the description of aging from referring to "barrels" to referring to "containers" – and rightly so, it appears. The law does seem to say "containers", not "barrels", although I think the containers are barrels in actual practice. The only mention of barrels in the law is something allowing labels to refer to government supervision of the production process in specific cases. I've never heard of someone using a non-barrel container to age bourbon (although I'm no expert). Does anyone have insight over why the law says "containers" rather than "barrels"? —BarrelProof (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Conceivably the container could have a different shape, so the law is broadly worded to include all of the possibilities. At least that's my guess. That said, no one uses anything but barrels, because barrels are a superior container for transportation of liquids. Hence oil barrels. oknazevad (talk) 16:46, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Barrels" versus "containers" 

message: Many bourbons use a charcoal filtering process similar (or identical) to that used for Tennessee and this ought be mentioned and described.
Drsruli (talk) 23:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're not identical. The Lincoln County process is a filtering of the new-make spirit before barrel aging, while the charcoal filtering mentioned on some bourbon bottles is after aging as part of the bottling process. That filtering is simply removing unwanted solids and fatty eaters that can cloud a drink. It's not the same thing. oknazevad (talk) 02:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charcoal Filtering
Talk:Age of Empires II

message: Hello,
Please do look at section Age of Empires II#Buildings, where it says that
 The Town Center can fire arrows at enemy units within range if villagers or archers are garrisoned while under attack.
It is not true that there is necessarily any "attack", whereas it simply fires when any unit enters the line of sight. 
This only seems accurate to me. Please share your thought about it :)
Hands of the vision (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for edit 

message: I propose to merge Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition into this article. Per the consesnsus here and here, remasters generally shouldn't have its own article unless the changes are very significant (which is not the case here).  OceanHok (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what's in the article and the cursory search for more info, it doesn't seem like there's a ton of separate information and distinct development/reception details that couldn't be summarized, so I'd be fine with a merge. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose the changes from original are signficant enough to warrant its own article (I mean this game was released 2 decades after the original so this is not a Talk:The Last of Us Remastered situation either). The coverage garnered by this game also satifies WP:GNG as laid out in its AFD which was a resounding keep and that was even before the game was released. Regards  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose as per Spy-Cicle. Mark49s (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *A development section doesn't exist right now. I am not seeing a very strong justification to have it as a standalone article when the parent article can accommodate all these information in a more coherant manner. OceanHok (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose - unlike with the HD Edition, which was basically just porting the game over to Steam and updating the game to work on Windows 8/10, the Definitive Edition is actually a new game in itself. The changes made in the Definitive Edition (graphics, sounds, UI, main menu, new campaigns) are significant enough that the Definitive Edition should have its own article. Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition has its own separate article for the same reason Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen has its own separate article. It's an enhanced remake (with enough new features to distinguish itself from the original game) and not just a remaster.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/European Union Olympic medals count for 2004

message: Technical question to the experts: please, what are the objective rules and criteria to declare a wikipedian vote as invalid? What would become the validity of the general vote in the - of course purely theoretical - case that those criteria wouldn't not be respected? --Pgreenfinch 11:52, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Sock puppet#Sock puppets forbidden from voting Mintguy (T)
What if there is a "stockpuppetship suspicion" error? For example, when the decision to attribute it to some votes comes in a rush, without looking further, when the vote is going to its end, and that it changes the direction of the vote? Theorical question of course ;-)) --Pgreenfinch 12:33, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Georgia Force

message: ((WIKIRANK)) Content: 3 Spelling: 3 Appearance: 3 RDN1F (don't) (talk) (to) (me) (before) (my) (coffee) (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiRank
Talk:Phi Kappa Psi

message: Editors should take note that the fraternity Phi Psi at the center of a recent controversy at Swarthmore College is a local fraternity, with no national affiliation despite being similar to this fraternity's nickname. Please do not insert material relating to that controversy, as it is not Phi Kappa Psi. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 16:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swarthmore College Phi Psi -- NOT the same fraternity 

message: Some of the scandals such as closures for drinking or minor hazing should be moved from this list and added to the chapter details in the List of Phi Kappa Psi chapters. Rublamb (talk) 04:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive scandal list 

message: Requesting editors to consider revising the sub-header "University of Virginia gang rape allegation" to "University of Virginia gang rape hoax" or "Rolling Stone Hoax". The word "allegation" in the sub-header comes across as misleading considering the body of that section is about a retracted article which the publisher settled out of court. An allegation is a claim that can be proven true or not; in this situation there was zero truth to the accusations made by the author and subject of the 2014 article. Mlcorcoran (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree.  Done. Jax MN (talk) 21:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider Revising Sub-Header about University of Virginia
Talk:USS Sims (DD-409)

message: My apologies: this article is not a copyright violation.  I have reverted it to before I replaced its contents with the copyvio notice.  Sorry about the misunderstanding. -Frazzydee 01:48, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a copyvio 

message: yes, this site is a copyvio, it's just a direct copy and paste from another source, public domain or not this is of no creative work, and should be deleted.Everett3 (talk) 23:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 

message: The article prose seems to be missing the casualty report that one would expect to go along with a US Navy ship sinking.  Is this normal for these articles?  N2e (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No record of casualties?
Category talk:Flowers

message: To avoid category-edit wars, since presumably century plant is not wanted here even though it has impressive flowers, I suggest that this document itself as "plants noted/grown/valued for their flowers" or some such. Stan 20:40, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, yeah. some meaning for the category would be nice. Plantago lanceolata is tagged to this category... why? (I'll remove the tag if there is no objection).SB Johnny 21:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd strongly recommend taking out all of the plant species (if not, it'll end up with thousands of articles), and limit it to pages on floral botany (pages like [Flower], [Petal], [Stamen], etc.) and other related pages like [Artificial flower]. - MPF 01:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. — Pekinensis 23:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category scope
Talk:Around the Sun

message: How do you Interpret the Lyric of the "High Speed Train" ? Is there a story behind it? what is  it trying to say?
What "Your drop like an anchor eyes" resembles?
:Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. The discussion pages here are for improving articles. Your subject isn't related to that, so visit some R.E.M forum instead. -Hapsiainen 10:39, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
"Around the Sun generally received lukewarm critical praise and despite hitting #1 in the UK, it became their first studio album to miss the US Top 10 (reaching #13 with 7 weeks in the Billboard 200) since 1988's Green and is still awaiting a gold record."
All right, this is a silly question but I bought Around The Sun through itunes but do own an actual cd copy.  Does buying an album through itunes count towards a bands sales?
--Starladustangel 03:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "High Speed Train" Interpretation? 
Talk:History of neuroimaging

message: Much of the credit for this article goes to User:Brinticus who added a large section on history and implications to the brain imaging article. The length was a bit unwieldy so, I split off the sections dealing with the history of brain imaging to this article, leaving a summary at brain imaging. If you wish to see the history of edits to this article, please refer to the brain imaging history tab before August 17, 2004. Sayeth 21:48, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
This is a great article, detailed and informative. Someone should consider finding a suitable image for it and nominating it for feature article status. Lisiate 02:02, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Much

message: What do people think of renaming this page to "History of neuroimaging"? "Neuroimaging" is both the more technically correct, and widely used term (now). Semiconscious (talk · home) 09:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: "Recent breakthroughs" seems like an odd paragraph to have in a page concerning the history of neuroimaging. Wouldn't it be better placed in the neuroimaging article?
MitchMcM (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent breakthroughs??? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Sxndrx2828 (talk) 23:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Psychology Honors
Talk:King Tut's Wah Wah Hut

message: > King Tut's also King Tut's Wah Wah Tent at in Scotland's biggest annual music festival,
 
> T in the Park, hosting many big acts. 
This sentence a verb. I think it at least one more verbs. Liam Proven (talk) 08:25, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Citing sources:  this blog mentions the '93 radiohead gig, with mp3s too (gnarly ones!). -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 21:56, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Ludibrium

message: Why would someone quietly suppress the links at this entry to internet troll and hacker? Not a question of doubtful relevance, surely. Wetman 22:23, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: If a players wishes to enter, they need a party of six people levels 35 to 50. To pass the challenges of the party quest, a party must include: a thief with dark sight, a cleric or wizard with level 1 teleport, and a bowman or assassin with maxed range. Players pass through a series of challenges to proceed to the bonus stage, where they break boxes to earn hidden surprises including items and mesos.
:The above was tacked onto the article. Can it be edited to shed light on ludibrium, the subject of this article? --Wetman 01:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ludibrium Party Quest 

message: Does "ludibrium" only refer to the conspiracy theories/hoaxes mentioned? Or is there a more general use for the term? It seems like an awfully narrow usage. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 23:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition? 
Category talk:Royal Navy admirals

message: I gather not everybody has articles yet; I came across a mention of John Rashleigh Rodd, made admiral in 1888.  He was 1st Lieutenant on the HMS Fisgard under a Captain John A. Dunze.  He is the namesake of Rodd Hill - Fort Rodd Hill National Historic Site at Esquimalt, British Columbia.  See this for source.Skookum1 (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: other admirals
Talk:Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries

message: :How does a comment get here with no signature?  The book is widely used in archaeology courses, that's enough to justify its inclusion.--Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now found out how to see who added a comment. The only other edit the person made who asked this to be deleted was to put a very rightwing POV on an article, so I'm assuming some such motivation was behind his/her request for deletion.Doug Weller (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Do Not Delete

message: I'm planning to make some improvements to this article including:
#Add an infobox with cover image.
#Add a book synopsis, history, and reception
#Add book contents with brief descriptions of the chapters.
Suggestions welcome Fracton (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes and additions
Talk:Aermacchi AM.3

message: I have removed the lead image as it is actually an Atlas Kudu, not a Bosbok. The Bosbok at the South African Air Force Museum in Swartkop is number 959, not 969 that was depicted in the photo. . The photo showing the Boskop interior is correct, it is number 920 at the Port Elisabeth branch of the museum . I'll visit the museum again soon and get a photo of 959 to replace the incorrect one that I removed.  --NJR_ZA (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image correction
Talk:Power exchange (BDSM)

message: These two articles seem like they cover the same topic, but there's little text in common between them.  HalJor 03:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Total power exchange]]

message: I'm redirecting this to BDSM. The term exists in the literature, but the problem is that the literature sucks: note how many of the hits in this Google search are self-published or otherwise unreliable--BiblioBazaar, Lulu.com, etc. The article has been tagged since 2007, and if it is to be a real article it needs serious work, not a bunch of Wipipedia links. Drmies (talk) 22:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect