Talk:Kingdom of Heaven (film)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kingdom of Heaven (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060225191013/http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/29/093635.php to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/29/093635.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090810181722/http://www.ugo.com/channels/dvd/features/tristanandisolde/kingdomdvdreview.asp to http://www.ugo.com/channels/dvd/features/tristanandisolde/kingdomdvdreview.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304160558/http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/kingdom-of-heaven/3676 to http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/kingdom-of-heaven/3676
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728054434/http://video.stv.tv/bc/entertainment-hotnow-20060919-interview-ridley-scott-exclusive-/ to http://video.stv.tv/bc/entertainment-hotnow-20060919-interview-ridley-scott-exclusive-/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This user has tried to make this edit twice, blanking the Academic criticism section of the article. If 2602:306:8389:4120:d43b:bd33:8499:b1a0 could please explain below why this removal should take place, we can establish consensus on what actions to take in regards to that section. ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡o) 23:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large removal of content proposed by {{contribs|2602:306:8389:4120:d43b:bd33:8499:b1a0|2602:306:8389:4120:d43b:bd33:8499:b1a0}} 

message: Srsly, u dont even know how to keep a frickin plot short and precise Titan2900 (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The earlier plot is 694 words, yours is 758, without imparting new information. Your first sentence reads:  It's technically correct, but squeezes too much in that clause. "In 1189" is more "short and precise" than "A few years later". 70.163.208.142 (talk) 06:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @70.163.208.142 and who the hell cares when is the movie set?? Its fictionalized, so nobody cares when is the movie set, plus mine is more precise and specific. Titan2900 (talk) 07:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not doing yourself favors here. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 08:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ur plot is longer than mine 

message: I don't think the categorization about the film being "about Islam" makes sense. This is a religious war epic, but does not contain any content about the religions themselves generally. The category relating to "religious war" are obviously accurate, but the "about Islam" or "about Catholicism" categories appear to relate to films that are "about" those religions or practices particular to those religions. Proposing to remove those categories and rely on the religious war-related categories instead.Homagetocatalonia (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization