lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Science fair

message: Shouldn't ISEF have its own page?  Cmouse 03:05, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: does anyone recall any information about a certain Westinghouse science fair competition? i have heard that the Intel fair used to be called the Westinghouse competition or something along those lines... anyone have any info?
: Certaintly.  The Intel Science Talent Search was for many years the Westinghouse Science Talent Search. Nothing changed, I believe, but the name. Also, there was a time (Tucson 1996 and before) when the Intel International Science fair had no Intel in it.  It was pretty similar, just the prize money was lower and the food was a bit worse.  Intel still had specific prizes (though they might have been new that year, I don't know) Cmouse 16:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  westinghouse 

message: I'm hoping that this is relevent enough, so I'm going to mention how Nicktoons have elementary school science fairs as a recurring theme. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brittany Ka (talk • contribs) 21:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elementary School Science Fairs in Nicktoons 

message: title. AndrewGarfieldIsTheBestSpiderMan (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  this sounds kinda biased or like a time for kids article.
Talk:Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Protocol

message: In order to add some more details on Proxy auto configuration, I have split this page into two, reviving the old Proxy auto-config page. It could be argued that all information conceptually fits into one page.  However, this page should then be called "Proxy configuration" or "Proxy auto-config" and discuss the details of all three levels: manual configuration, PAC and WDAP, each adding another layer of automatisation on top of the previous level.
Yaakov Belch
The Site-local options section feels a bit rough (and inappropriate in tone); the second sentence particularly has suffered grammatical/editing errors that have muddied its meaning. I've already changed the _ASCII Italics_ into real italics, but I'm not about to touch the rest since it was precisely what I was trying to find out in the first place. 202.27.216.35 08:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The MIME type of the JavaScript configuration file is listed in the article as application/x-ns-proxy-autoconfig; however, I've found one reference  that specifies that this is an old, deprecated MIME type and that conforming sites should instead use application/x-javascript-config. David McBride 14:50, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: The best citation I found on the net was this http://www.msexchangefaq.de/verschiedenes/wpad.htm
it is in German, but the table is very informative. It is outdated but newer then the rest I found. Very good is the difference by splitting up the support by the criteria: DHCP, DNS, manual script.
We should consider to overtake and update a similar table! mabdul 10:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Browser support
Category talk:Buzzword

message: This seems to me like a poorly defined category. Does it cover only present-day English-language buzzwords? Or buzzwords of all times, places and languages? Or somewhere in between? What sort of citation should be required to include an item in the category? -- Jmabel | Talk 03:21, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
:My original idea was for present-day buzzwords (like synergy). In fact, I created it because Synergy needed a home. But I have no say on how it will end up being used.
:As for a citation, I thought that something in the article saying it is currently being used as a buzzword would be enough (after all, the decision is on the article, not on the category).
:I'm not too worried about this category; if it ends up being a bad idea, someone will put it up on WP:CFD (and that's why I'm adding articles one at a time to it from the list at Buzzword, instead of adding the full list at once — less work reverting if it turns out to be wrong).
:--cesarb 23:32, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly defined? 

message: Why is this in :Category:Neologisms? Not all buzzwords are neologisms. "Paradigm" is easily a century old. I don't know how old "synergy" is, but it was already a buzzword in the 1960s. -- Jmabel | Talk 04:49, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
:I've removed the link.  Synergy comes from the Greek synergos ("working together"), so I doubt it's a neologism.  --Merovingian (t) (c) 11:18, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologisms?
Talk:Chevrolet Lumina APV

message: I keep trying to copyedit this but the Wikipedia doesn't seem to be taking my large database commits well at the moment.
This article needs:
* Minor NPOV
* Copyedit
* Fix Those Capitalized Section Titles
* Delete most of the images, and put the rest on the right.  Wikipedia is not a gallery.
Most importantly, this needs to be merged with the Pontiac Trans Sport and Oldsmobile Silhouette pages.  There's a ton of duplicate information on all three.  As far as I can tell, there aren't many model-specific notes.  I figure most of the above changes should be made after a merge, in any event.
I'm also very concerned that the images on these pages aren't released under a free license.  --Milkmandan 03:46, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)
I believe I've now addressed your concerns listed above, and per our direct correspondance, I have provided the necessary differentiation between the three models' pages, and will continue to update them individually as more data becomes available.
Rawja 10:03, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: I just open user name with on this page looking to see if someone helps me with my problem, I took the task of rebuilding the transmission on by Lumina APV 4T60E. I have been able to do it with the help of Hanes Tech book, but this book does not show every detail, specifically the position of the checkballs for the channel plate and valve body, the ones shown are for a different transmission.
My name Luis A. Aviles, PO Box 676. Peñuelas, PR 00624, my E-mail is luisycarmen@yahoo.com.
Would greatly appreciate any ones help.
Luis A. Aviles  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luisycarmen (talk • contribs) 00:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1994 Lumina APV 4T60E Transaxle
Talk:Ray Gun

message: ...No More Info on it yet.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
.
.
: That was Not my text! I Observed it, presumably long after its perpetration ‘’’contribution’’’. “You could look it up.” I don't care enuf to work further on it, as long as the former erroneous notions don’t reappear. ----JerzyA (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Of Brad Birds Films ... 

message: : A raygun is a  (primarily science-fiction) weapon, delivering to a target a beam of destructive particles or radiant energy, and generally featuring very slow decay of the (destructive-)energy density of the beam,  due to any lateral spreading, as distance from the weapon increases on its path to the target.
   I replaced, not bcz I think my whole version is desirable, but bcz what I found had way too many misconceptions being promoted. An interested and careful editor can trim out many of my details, provided they DON”T restore any wording that I threw out, which was called for by the colleague’s wild guesses about the substance of the late-20th-cen. physics involved.—JerzyA (talk), the physics guy, 05:36, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-formatted & reworded verY flaky talk contrib
Talk:Event videography

message: The videographer vs photographer section needs to be edited for neutrality.
More emphatically, this page is an embarrassment. The photographer-videographer debate has no place here (speaking as one who does both professionally). Why not just remove that part entirely? It seems too obvious to even include, but you could also write "At events where both photographers and videographers are working, it is advantageous for them to coordinate with each other."
Yanked the links to the PVAs (professional video associations regional). There are so many that including them all could turn the whole thing into a links farm. Also pulled the AAEV since this is nothing but 2 people's attempt to approve themselves and has been a "dead" site for years. Left the two national orgainzations in because they can be sources of information.
I agree with the opinion that flagged this entry, it was a disaster. More of a promotion for selling event video to the public than an informative article of what event video is. And the links area was in danger of becoming a farm for self promotion like:     
* Total Training
* Wrigley Video Productions
* Guide to Professional Wedding Videography
Total training doesn't need links if you are in the industry you've heard of them. Wrigley I have no idea who they are  a better link for Adobe stuff would be Creative Cow and Hal Landen and his guide to PWV can promote themselves. It's not even an updated resource. Photos vs Video has no place in an encylopedia the industry can promote its self on that grounds. Moved the shooting styles over to the wedding videography entry since they apply more to that. BJ Peterson 20:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Three E.P.'s

message: While the misused apostrophe pains me, I'm afraid that, according to my copy, this is how the CD is punctuated: I've changed it on all the relevant pages ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Subaru Tecnica International

message: I just made a large number of edits to this article.
* This page needs a lot of references. I tagged where they are needed. This includes some of the information I added (sorry about that).
* Some of the references that were in the page did not have the information being cited. I replaced these with "citation needed" tags when I found them.
* There was a lot of extraneous information about the history of Subaru and Fuji Heavy Industries, but which did not pertain to STI in particular. I tried to remove this without disrupting the rest of the page.
* Two paragraphs from the "History" section belonged in the "Subaru models with STI trim" section. I moved them down and tried to integrate their information into the flow of that section.
* The whole page needed word flow improvements and paragraph reorganization. In several instances, information was not given in complete sentences. I have tried to fix these problems as best I could without completely rewriting them.
* Some of the paragraphs in the "Subaru models with STI trim" section were out of logical order. I tried to put them in an order which made better sense, either by category or by chronology.
* I removed a tag from the header that was giving an error.
The page could still use a lot of attention. -Athaler (talk) 19:28, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot: I also cribbed a whole section about the history of the WRX from the "motorsports" section of the Impreza page. -Athaler (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edits 

message: Why is there an image of a Prius?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.189.107.245 (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Issues
Talk:National Woman's Party

message: However, during the short period it lasted, the Democrats were in power,
:If we ignore the 1920s, that is.
many of them were arrested by police, some were possibly torture during their periods in jail
:Source? Adding the word "possibly" doesn't make it any more believable.
In 1920, the 19th amendment was ratified, but the NWP was given little, if any, credit for the new step for women's equality.
:Someone with more knowledge of the suffrage movement can reinsert this if appropriate. It assumes that they deserved credit and that they did not get it. While both may be true, the other incidences of sloppiness make me cautious about repeating this.
they also staged a suffrage parade on March 3, 1913, the day before Wilson's inauguration, that was broken up by the police. Many of the NWP's members, upon arrest, went on hunger strikes
:They were actually arrested while picketing the White House for the impedment of traffic Watersoftheoasis 17:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Obvious errors and dubious claims

message: ...the NWP was eclipsed by other feminist groups and was defunct by 1930. The NWP's membership withered but it is inaccurate to say it went "defunct." Therefore 18:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, the NWP were instrumental in including "sex" in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This article is in dire need of a re-write. Should this article be tagged? Therefore 19:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Defunct?

message: There are some excellent histories of the NWP, as well as the Suffragist and Equal Rights.  This article needs a rewrite. Maineshepp (talk) 21:06, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision needed 

message: Encyclopedia of the American Left, 2d, edited by Mari Jo Buhle, Paul Buhle, and Dan Georgakas, 1998, Oxford, the entry of Women's Liberation, pg. 882,states "Politically isolated, the NWP narrowed into a small, elite band of Paul's followers who frequently expressed flagrant racist, anti-Semitic, and red-baiting sentiments." Unfortunately, nothing more is said on the topic, but it is a reliable source, and the entry is written by Ruth Rosen, as of the date of publication "Professor of History at the Universty of California, Davis, and is the editor of The Maimie Papers and author of The Lost Sisterhood: Prostitution in America."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.74.25 (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NWP: Racism, antisemitism, and "red-baiting"
Talk:Raúl Salinas de Gortari

message: I don't have any biographical information on this guy – I'll look around, but if anyone can find anything, that would be awesome.  I've got more info on his claim to fame (his corruption), and that will be coming soon once I get a chance. --Spangineer ∞ 04:40, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
:Okay, I'll help if I can. Maccore Henni Mii! Pictochat Mii! (Note: respond on minha talk page 00:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here we go, . First one I clicked  Another one (in Spanish) . If I formatted this wrong, just fix it, please. Hope this helps. Maccore Henni Mii! Pictochat Mii! (Note: respond on minha talk page 00:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terminology of homosexuality

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Homophile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 16#Homophile until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  QueenofBithynia (talk) 22:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Homophile" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This Wikipedia page should create a section for the term achillean (a more modern male-loving-male counterpart for sapphic, in comparison to Uranian). Nyxtingale (talk) 05:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep! I agree, it's a commonly used term which should have a section. A Socialist Trans Girl 10:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on the term 'Achillean'
Talk:Ricochet (comics)

message: The Real Name Johnathon "Johnny" Gallo and no Jonathan "Johnny" Gallo, link http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Johnathon_Gallo_(Earth-616) or  https://marvel.com/universe/Ricochet_(Johnny_Gallo)
Thank you
--82.243.67.3 (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Fragrant Concubine

message: Another Chinese-language source (which I can't read, hence nothing's been incorporated from it into this article yet) may be found here. --MC MasterChef 04:55, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese source 

message: I deleted this section, which appears to be an extensive direct quote from an existing book, "Uighur Stories Along the Silk Road". A quote of that length seems like probably copyright violation to me, as well as the fact that the story has already been summarized in the article. If I'm mistaken, please feel free to revert, though I think it should folded in rather than repeating the legend a third time. --MC MasterChef 00:46, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Story of Iparhan" 

message: Who moved this page to "Consort Rong" without raising it here first? First of all, this has led to a number of redirects, and second, Xiangfei is known as "Fragrant Concubine". This page needs to be moved back to Fragrant Concubine as per WP:UCN.--Niohe 01:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i undid the move as no proposal was made and no reason was given in the move summary.--Jiang 04:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a ton!--Niohe 04:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fragrant Concubine 

message: I think this article should be renamed Iparkhan since that was the actual name of the fragrant concubine.--Gurdjieff (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move for rename 

message: Shouldn't Xiangfei redirect here, with a link to the game character at the top?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.114.62.129 (talk) 07:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xiangfei 
Talk:Meleager (general)

message: I'm removing the Gay/lesbian/bi category tag as the article doesn't mention anything about this; if someone wants to provide some evidence to put in the article, I'll have no objection to its reinsertion.  Binabik80 05:04, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lesbian? That would be interesting. Alexander 007 20:46, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Without doubt ;-) Sadly, I believe the guy who placed that category was only joking, unless he had spoken directly with Meleager's spirit Aldux 21:26, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  he was probably a Xena fan.  Lonepointe (talk) 02:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 10

message: I just removed duplicate postings from this page.  I don't think I erased anyone's comment, but appologies if I did, it wasn't intentional. --CVaneg 16:08, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did it again --CVaneg 17:00, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Talk Dupe
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 11

message: #Macdougal 19:03, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro-life

message: #Neutralitytalk 18:52, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)
#They oppose abortion. They don't oppose death. --SPUI (talk) 18:57, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-abortion

message: #65.11.101.198 01:17, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Theocratic Dominionist
Talk:Air Atlanta Icelandic

message: Any chance someone can explain how Air Atlanta, Air Atlanta Icelandic, Air Atlanta Europe, and Excel Airways are related?
: All these airlines are owned by Avion Group. --Ómar Kjartan Yasin 17:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I have deleted the following information from the article
* Information on the models - this is a hobbyist thing and has nothing to do with the operations or history of the airline. --Russavia 18:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant info.
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 12

message: Under Legal involvement and "Terri's Law", second paragraph, there appears to be a wrong date:
:On October 10, 2003, [...]. Five days later, on October 10 [...].
(And kudos to all of you who are working hard to keep this article up to date and NPOV.)  --Fbriere 09:48, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date under [[Terri Schiavo#Legal involvement and "Terri's Law"|Legal involvement and "Terri's Law"]] 

message: Since these terms are being used (and possibly abused) in the media, I noticed a request on the Community Portal for the term Culture of Life.  Since my 1st attempt at that article was challenged as NPOV, I felt that I should have the subject reviewed here prior to insertion in this article's "See Also"s.  I took to liberty of flagging Culture of Death as well.  I want to ensure that the finished products are the best they can be out of respect to the families and all those touched by this subject.--ghost 21:00, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Culture of Life vs. Culture of Death

message: I've seen pictures of the CAT scans of Terri's brain, and one of those would make an excellent adition to the article.  Unfortunately, I've lost track of the images.  Can someone find one that's public domain or fair use for this article?  --L33tminion | (talk) 03:09, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
:Google found one here --Vik Reykja ♬ 03:38, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brain CAT Scans
Talk:Weber (unit)

message: Is the SI multiples table really necessary?  It's not as though the SI prefixes apply just to webers, they apply to all SI units; other articles on SI units don't carry this table.  The table highlights that milli-, micro-, and nano-weber are the most common multiples used, which may be worth mentioning in the article (perhaps?), but the table as a whole seems superfluous.  90.209.4.167 (talk) 14:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SI multiples 

message: Shouldn't we mention the name Weber is pronounced [veːbɛʁ]? --79.199.69.200 (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPA 

message: Isn't the first sentence wrong? The unit of flux density B is the Tesla, as stated in magnetic flux density, where it also says one Tesla is one Weber per square meter (1T = 1Wb/m^2). A "flux density of 1 Wb" is incorrect. The sentence should read: "a flux of 1 Wb is 1T*m^2", or more explicitly, " a flux density B through an area of 1m^2 gives a flux of 1Wb". Note also the inconsistency with the lower paragraph on derived units. El perseguidor (talk) 17:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weber vs Tesla 

message: "The weber may be defined in terms of Faraday's law, which relates a changing magnetic flux through a loop to the electric field around the loop."
The loop that is being referred to if I understand correctly if just a closed circuit of conductive wire?
This could be clarified a bit but is generally indicative.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.mielnik (talk • contribs) 08:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  terminology "loop" 

message: in the Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) 2006, table B.8, there is listed a unit pole = 1.256 637 E−07 Wb. I cannot find this unit and description anywhere else. Ra-raisch (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  unit pole