lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Invasive plants

message: * Cleanup needed to convert rhetorical questions to normal prose, and reduce US-centric treatment - MPF 13:46, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Clean-up needed to change from a term paper to an article.  But the contributor did give it a good and thorough start.  I think it may be too big to merge into invasive species, but maybe after cleanup that can be done. - Marshman 21:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * As requested on the discussion page, we propose to clean up the invasive plants page,  convert rhetorical examples to normal prose,and reduce US-centric treatment.  We will include relevant examples and up-to-date ecological theory on invasive plant mechanisms.  We will post changes on Dec. 9, 2005.  We have written from our areas of knowledge, but welcome additional information from contributors outside California and the United States. --PBG250 23:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Arun District

message: I think it is necessary to disambiguate "Arun". Arun Wat is a temple in Thailand. Wat means temple. Link to Wat Arun Arunram 14:20, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diambiguation 

message: I removed the explanation of the meaning in Hindi of the word "arun". On this page, that information has no place as the river is not taken from Hindi. This bit of info about Hindi is relevant, however, on the disambiguation page and is already mentioned there. Interlingua 15:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning in Hindi 
Talk:Ethics in Government Act

message: My guess is that this refers to some Act passed by the U.S. government? As other governments have their own Ethics Acts & regulations; I suggest this article be renamed to reflect the nation it is relevant to. :)
Question: What about gifts? Isn't one requirement to report gifts also? The Ted Stevens scandal seems to say he violated this Ethics Act (on his wikipedia page), and that was because he did not report gifts (which is not the same thing as income in my opinion. Doesn't this Ethics Act say anything about gifts also? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guest173 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead states that, "The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 is a United States federal law that was passed in the wake of the Nixon Watergate scandal and the Saturday Night Massacre. It created mandatory, public disclosure of financial and employment history of public officials and their immediate families. It also created restrictions on lobbying efforts by public officials for a set period after leaving public office." 
But it isn't clear from the article what happened in the events mentioned that made the Act necessary - does this require some explanation for those of us who are unfamiliar with the reasons behind this legislation? JezGrove (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation required?
Talk:Karl Gützlaff

message: Apparently Maria Newell is of interest in her own right, as the first unmarried woman missionary to be sent out by the LMS, but the bits on the net are pretty sparse. Interestingly, 1911EB seems to go out of its way not to mention her name. Stan 15:48, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:White hole

message: For a second time User:Noz92 did a complete replacement  of the article, I reverted again for these reason:
*old content, includeing referencesm was deleted
*new content not very layman-friendly
*it's Schwarzschild, not Swartzchild. If you don't know this, there a some doubts about your qualifications to edit this article
Pjacobi 15:49, 2005 Jan 22 (UTC)
----
Can somebody who speaks Japanese check the edit by 166.121.37.7.  The old link was an actual article while the current one looks like the notice of no article yet.  --Laura Scudder | Talk 00:09, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange edit

message: I've noticed a few times on WP that people mention things along the following lines: 'in the science fiction series blah blah blah, ... one character falls into a wormhole and blah blah blah'. It might be OK to mention stuff like that in non-scientific articles, but in the middle of scientific ones is a little out of place. Perhaps a little section on science fiction is appropriate in the scientific article (especially for controversial ideas like wormholes) - something like the article Alcubierre drive (if I remember correctly). Mpatel 08:26, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for removing the 'Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy' edit 

message: Throughout science, there's a move towards uniformly abbreviating supermassive black hole as SBH. 104.190.63.217 (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supermassive Black Hole abbreviated SBH
Talk:Dinosaurs of the Isle of Wight

message: I've listed this for cleanup and I hope to get around to it myself. But if I don't, here's my suggestions as to what we need:
*Some images, or at least one anyway
:I have been looking through the dinosaurs which we link to, but there aren't any images! I have some photos of the models that I've taken at Dinosaur Isle which we could potential use, but unfotunatly that apparently is contrary to copyright (photos are only allowed in the museum for personal use). Neo 10:56, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the rest of these I'm going to try to get a paelontologist friend of mine to expand the scientific content of the article (but I need to talk to him when I get back to the Island - i.e. March-April time). But I think the article is pretty spiffy right now - a basic introduction, and certainly better than a stub or no article at all! Neo 10:56, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur - it's now a presentable article as it is. Good work, what a quick response! I've removed the cleanup text, and perhaps I'll get round to adding something positive. Meanwhile, my list above can serve as suggestions. I look forward to seeing what your learned friend produces. Naturenet 22:57, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Powered paragliding

message: Re: combining "PPC" (powered parachute) and PPG "powered paragliding".
These are distinctly different activities with VERY little overlap in participants. It would be like combining windsurfing with sailboating -- they both have hulls and sails but are attract different people and have vastly different skill sets and equipment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paramotor (talk • contribs) 18:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

message: I think this is a nice article but it has places where it needs better footnoting and referencing to avoid the appearance of OR. I've read enough on the subject to know that its not OR and the parts that are referenced are referenced well. I don't know enough about the subject to risk messing it up by a bunch of edits to nonstandard referenced so I think the usual editors would do a better job than I would here.Trilobitealive (talk) 23:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: tags

message: Duh.  It seems typical Wikipediaians think "encyclopedic style," means dry and dusty. Hence all the articles like this. 
But it does talk about paragliders, regs, & records, and all that dry dusty copy & paste "factual" stuff.  Yippy. Please change the article content or title. Cheers!  <BR> --2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:C16D:7F97:1C4C:6D39 (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why nothing about powered paragliding?
Talk:Glycoprotein

message: I am not really sure whether Abeta is an short name for amyloid beta peptide so it wouldn't hurt for someone medically trained  to look at it. I also thought of writing a article on it, but on reading a bit on the subject, i concluded there is no way it would be coherent so any help would be appreciated.
I removed a seemingly random "your mom" from after the last sentence, does anyone know of any valid reason that was there?  The edit description of the editor that added it provided no description at all and it seemed out of place...
Wintermut3 23:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is aminohexase? Is it suppose to be aminohexose? --Kupirijo 04:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aminohexase 

message: Is D-Fucose shown in the figure used? I though it was L-Fucose. --Kupirijo 04:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-Fucose 

message: This term (which is present in a couple of articles) seems to me to be a synonym for glycoprotein. If so, please create a redirect page for it.Asinthior (talk) 14:37, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glucoprotein 

message: "It is important to distinguish endoplasmic reticulum-based glycosylation of the secretory system without of reversible cytosolic/nuclear glycosylation. "  Thanks in advance. ( Martin |  talk • contribs  20:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What means this (in the lead paragraph)?  Not a sentence 

message: The following sentence contains the root predicate: "perturbation is dispensible". 
In contrast, perturbation of glycan processing (enzymatic removal/addition of carbohydrate residues to the glycan), which occurs in both the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus, is dispensable for isolated cells (as evidence by survival with glycosides inhibitors) but can lead to human disease (congenital disorders of glycosylation) and can be lethal in animal models.
Maybe that's all valuable information, but at least hang this hairball on a stronger hook. (You can tell that few readers have bothered to wade into this dense, soupy swamp because "as evidence be" has not been fixed.) — MaxEnt 23:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perturbation is dispensible 

message: I am editing this page for a class Wikipedia project so I will be adding a few sections to the article and editing some existing ones. Please feel free to let me know if anything needs additional editing. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alib2022 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New addtions 

message: What are glycoproteins 197.213.137.182 (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:Telecommunications in Malaysia

message: this looks like a page cut of of the world factbook with formatting still intact. 
Copyvio?--Malbear 17:25, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: MiTV claimed on their site that they combine IP and UHF to make an "enjoyable experience" with all their services and stuff. Are they using cable(not quite likely) or satellite or what?--Bruin rrss23 08:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MiTV may be satellite or radio or ??? 

message: Please counter check.. data is of 2009 and severely out of date...
AMAX is bankrupt ..along with other 4G WiMax Operators. Left P1 Green Packet and YES 4G YTL networks.
Saradanny (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMAX ?? Outdated Data?? 

message: Please double check availability of AM radio stations. In Klang, Malaysia, the are no local radio stations on the AM band. However, occasionally there will be DXing of Thai, Vietnamese or Indonesian stations.  RAM (talk) 05:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  AM Radio stations?? 

message: I think that some of the history from Telekom Malaysia should be moved here. The company was founded in 1984, but for some reason theres an essay on telephones in Malaysia going back to the 19 century. It makes more sense for that information to be here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RidinTheWaves (talk • contribs) 22:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Any information from Telekom Malaysia regarding the development of general (nation-wide) telecommunication in Malaysia should probably be merged (or re-written) here in Telecommuncations in Malaysia. But those historial information of Telekom Malaysia as their entity as a company (e.g. shareholder, workforce size growth, any subsidiary establishment or merging, etc) should not be written in this Telecommunications in Malaysia article. Chongkian (talk) 08:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging content from Telekom Malaysia
Talk:All Ball

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/All Ball.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 00:32, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 

message: *All Ball lived with Koko until he escaped from her cage and was run over by a car in December of that year.
This sentence could use some restructuring.  Although he refers to All Ball, it's hard to tell since the pronoun Koko confuses this fact slightly. -- AllyUnion (talk) 01:25, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar fixing 

message: Does this need to be a stub? It isn't that long, but that is about all there is to say about him. Maybe someone knows aho old AB was, but a full article doesn't need everything. I'm just asking because I don't want it to seem like a full article when it isn't. Howabout1 21:48, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be merged with Koko_%28gorilla%29#Koko.27s_cats — Omegatron 23:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Did Koko pick the name 'All Ball' for her cat because it rhymes? Sign language doesn't 'rhyme', per se, but when the good Dr. talked to Koko it rhymed. Did Koko recognise this? (13 March 2005)
:This is not really something that could be answered by anyone other than Koko, and - the question of how adept her language skills really are aside - I don't think she's ever been taught the concept of "words that rhyme". Furthermore, you'll note that her later kittens did not have rhyming names. DS 13:18, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I speculate that the term may have been Koko's reaction to the kitten's lack of a tail and thus having a more rounded overall shape; or perhaps her attempt to state that the curled-up kitten was all balled up.  Or it could have been mere babbling. LeoO3 20:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I speculate that Patterson made it up. Chrisrus (talk) 03:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gorilla rhymes 

message: I assume Smokey and Lipstick are no longer with us. Has she gotten any new cats in recent years? Jon Hart 05:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha. Smokey was the name of my old cat. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.83.129 (talk) 21:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer cats 

message: It should be merged with Koko_%28gorilla%29#Koko.27s_cats — Omegatron 23:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The All Ball AfD from Feb 05 shows 7 keep, 6 merge.. pretty close I guess. Personally I said keep - but would admit to a decision based on emotion. :)--Bookandcoffee 23:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I'd rather it wasn't merged. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 21:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge 2007

message: I removed the following sentence from the article:
*It has been said that Koko cried for two days after the event.
The citation request had been attached to it for a year with no source provided. —CKA3KA (Skazka) (talk) 19:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cried for two days
Talk:Ameritech

message: This page is about the 1983 - 2003 company not the current at&t, the name for this page is Ameritech at the top, should match the infobox.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 00:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the infobox name to: Ameritech 

message: Should there be some mention in the article of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americast Ameritech's cable company?76.226.205.69 (talk) 23:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Americast 
Talk:List of Guggenheim Museums

message: The Guggenheim-Hermitage museum really is in Las Vegas, and is in The Venetian Hotel, as was the (now closed) Guggenheim Las Vegas. - MykReeve 17:48, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Guggenheim-Hermitage
Talk:Terrible Secret of Space

message: This article was proposed for deletion January 2005.  The discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Terrible Secret of Space.  There was a strong suggestion that this article should be merged with Something Awful.  Joyous 17:49, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)
This article was previously merged with Something Awful but the information it contains was not merged into that article, so I restored this one. 24.17.83.44 07:26, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject of this article is in no way notable enough for an article. I have restored the redirect to Something Awful. If you, or someone else, disagrees, you can restore the content, but if so I will take it to Articles for deletion, where I strongly suspect the result will be exactly the same as it was in 2005. This wasn't notable then, and I don't think it's become notable in the time since. Terraxos (talk) 02:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Assisted take-off

message: This is a stupid question, but i just wondered when i read about jet donkey, how did the engineers miss the effect of Wake Turbulence? That donkey is so small compared to some planes that i find it hard to believe it could have handle the resulting turbulence
:I don't think that it would have to, it sounds a lot like Eugen Sänger's version of the Amerika Bomber the Silbervogel. The pertinent words here are "rail". In Sanger's version the rocket powered dolly would be permantly attached to the rails which would be securely fixed tothe ground. In Philip Bono's "Frontiers of Space" there are a couple of illustrations of such captive rocket booster configurations from the 60's.Koonan the almost civilised 22:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the article properly, and I've got it wrong. I thought the donkey was the dolly, rather than a seperate aircraft. Koonan the almost civilised 23:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Children's Hour

message: I have removed the reference to "the National Service" as there was never a BBC radio channel of that name. There was a BBC National Programme from 1930 to 1939; however, I do not believe that The Children's Hour was ever broadcast in that service as CH went out in different regional versions. -- Picapica 18:35, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: (Very late!) correction to my remarks above: The Children's Hour (London version) was broadcast in the long-wave (ex-5XX) National Programme when that service was radiated from Daventry, between 10 March 1930 and 6 October 1934. From 8 October 1934 to 1 September 1939 – following the switch of the long-wave service from Daventry to Droitwich – that version of The Children's Hour was moved to the London Regional Programme. -- Picapica (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

message: When you go to the link you find she was really called "Kathleen Garscadden" with a "c" in the surname. As this is a link, I can't make the change without damaging it. So I hope someone with the right technical knowledge can do it.213.127.210.95 (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, IP. Iselilja (talk) 06:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kathleen Garsgadden" 

message: I was born in 1934, so his voice became very familiar to me, and what a  beautiful one it was, equalled only by the music critics Alec Robertson and Antony Hopkins; and Helen Henschel among others. Their like is seldom heard these days.
I think it a pity that no mention is made that the very last day of broadcasting of Children's Hour was of Oscar Wilde's The Selfish Giant, being a sideswipe at the BBC. Potterton6 (talk) 00:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Davis - Uncle David.
Talk:International Organisation of Good Templars

message: To mark the article's rebirth I swept the talk page. Jobjörn 12:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: *History, agenda, just about everything. Jobjörn 12:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: Are a) the list of every single country in the history section, b) the redlink farm of national bodies, necessary? Gordonofcartoon 20:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There ought to be some mention of national bodies. Not sure all of them have to be listed, of course. Jobjörn (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: National organisations

message: fail to see how this lacks notability since the organization has spread all over the world Addicted2Sanity (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll fix this article up some day. Definitely notable though. Jobjörn (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: I believe the organisation has changed name to simply "IOGT International", i.e. that the letters IOGT don't mean anything--they're there for historical reasons only.
However, I'm not able to find a source that clearly states this. The closest I've come, is the IOGT International Constitution. 193.71.107.251 (talk) 09:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, IOGT does mean something, else its value to the organization is nil. If it is an acronym for "International Organization of Good Templars," then "IOGT International" is quite redundant: International Order of Good Templars International. If, however, it is actually an historical acronym for "Independent Order of Good Templars," then IOGT International would make more sense and would be grammatically correct (a bonus!). I suspect, based on my exploration of various Web sites and documents related to IOGT, that the organization itself is not completely certain how to translate (or interpret) the acronym, or perhaps is divided on the question. In any case, the historical name, "Good Templars," evidently is no longer favored as a brand. PlaysInPeoria (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Id like to add that a branch was founded in Canada(new brunswick) after 1870.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.6.132 (talk) 00:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  divisions
Talk:Music of West Bengal

message: Tamang selo, this genre of music is not related to Bengali music. It is also not a part of West Bengal music. Take steps..... Wikifulness (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamang selo issue
Talk:Gerald McBoing-Boing

message: I am confused, at the wiki site for Dr. Seuss we claim that Gerald McBoing-Boing was written in approximately 1949, and won an academy award in 1950, but on the Gerald McBoing-Boing wiki site, we claim that Gerald was written in 1951, and never mentions an academy award.
: Released in Jan. 1951, won the academy award that year - fixed the Dr. Seuss date - DavidWBrooks 01:22, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But the master list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Animated_Short_Film has it winning the 1950 Academy Award. So does this page: http://theoscarsite.com/pictures1950/geraldmcboing.htm which looks pretty authoritative. BTW, I added a mention of scorer Gail Kubik, who always gets credited when the piece is presented in a concert form (a la Peter and the Wolf).--BillFlis 20:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the confusion is that the 1950 award was given at the ceremony in March 1951. That should, mean that the cartoon was released in 1950, since the awards (even back then) were given for films released in the previous calendar year. However, I can find several authoritative-looking sites that give January 1951 as the release date, including  and  and . Jan. 1951 is early enough to be included in the "1950" award ceremony, even though it seems to break the Academy Awards rule ... so I am confused. - DavidWBrooks 00:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an example of a concert performance of the poem narrated with an orchestra performing Kubik's score, in a children's concert: http://www.radio.cbc.ca/orchestra/pdf/Sept19-2004.pdf Maybe we should say that GMcBB is the name of several things: book by Dr. Seuss, short film, TV series, concert piece.--BillFlis 21:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused

message: The 1956-57 Sunday series was not called The Gerald McBoing-Boing Show. According to an ad that CBS ran in Broadcasting magazine Feb 11 1957 it was called The Boing-Boing Show. The Chicago Tribune also called it that when it debuted Dec 16 1956, as did the New York Times and the Boston Globe, all available online. 2600:4040:5D30:4800:EDB9:E3EE:4FD2:3CB2 (talk) 02:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  series name