lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pen register

message: "Pen register" in the news (CNET):
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57596791-38/fbi-pressures-internet-providers-to-install-surveillance-software/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.169.118.107 (talk) 14:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Government surveillance 

message: I came upon the article pen trap, which has "Multiple issues," including that is was orphaned.  As I started creating links to the pen trap article, I came across "Pen register," which seems to be exactly the same device, with a slightly different name.  Before spending more time improving the pen trap article, I would like to know if all of the information should be put into one article.   Comfr (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the two pages could helpfully be merged; Pen trap is more up-to-date, but Pen register is more historically complete, and they could show a continuum of ideas and applications. Klbrain (talk) 19:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, a trap and trace device is something else. It's something attached to an incoming phone line to prevent "release", so the caller can't hang up. In an electromechanical exchange, technicians could then manually follow the path back through the switch to get the calling number. Huge pain. A not very good source for this.. John Nagle (talk) 23:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Pen trap]] into this article 

message: Added a close up photo of an actual pen register. This Bunnell brass and cast iron wind up device seems to be the final development in pen registers. The next step, in the 1970s, was the "dialed number recorder" with electronics and a cash register type printer. John Nagle (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added photo of a pen register 

message: WhatsApp registration 102.89.46.156 (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I use number for what
Talk:Personnel halting and stimulation response rifle

message: ::I removed the WP:LE tag because even though this product has potential for use in law enforcement it is a prototype military weapon.EMT1871 16:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject Law Enforcement tag

message: *LE Systems, Inc., manufacturer of the Laser Dazzler
different device - could put it in Laser dazzler, but it's potentially spam.
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 21:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted link to LE Systems, Inc.
Talk:USS Carpenter

message: New info box placed but modified due to dual career.
Sanbox test removed.  Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sandbox of requested infobox

message: What needs to be done to get a GA rating? Jrcrin001 (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: References per section completed. Jrcrin001 (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article status

message: The USS Carpenter became a class or sub-class of the Gearing Class ships.  Does anyone have a good source on this? 
*See: http://www.gyrodynehelicopters.com/carpenter_class.htm
*See: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/class-list.htm
Jrcrin001 (talk) 03:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Carpenter Class
Talk:Poison (comics)

message: Hello all. I couldn't help but notice that this article is not about the character poison, but actually two separate, unrelated characters, which both happen to be called poison. If others agree, I have two suggestions. The first suggestion is two start another "Poison" page, and move one of the characters there. The second suggestion is to move any information about the Peter Parker "Poison", which is not already present on the Venom (comics) page, to the Venom (comics) page. The Venom (comics) page is a page about the Venom symbiote, which is the major component of the Peter Parker "Poison", so I feel this would be an appropriate location for information on the second "Poison" in this article.
Let me know what you think. --Darktower 12345 21:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Move it to Alternate versions of Spider-Man#What if? 204.153.84.10 (talk) 22:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good idea, any other thoughts? --Darktower 12345 22:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Adding more info to the Alternate versions of Spider-Man#What if? page, for starters.  All that's there is a link to this page.  75.157.110.77 (talk) 06:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Characters
Talk:Henry Flitcroft

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whose "B"? is the real question. One wonders in what cultural context an assessment of "low priority" is rendered, doubtless after great consideration. Is the context "European culture since the Renaissance". Or is it "Neo-Palladianism in Great Britain? To be perfectly honest, shouldn't Henry Flitcroft really be rated "uncool"? One wonders, would the flagger here hesitate for a moment before tagging an opinion in an architecture article WP:NPOV?--Wetman 00:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Assuming that your "real question" is just that, my answer would be the steps listed in the "easy steps" above are not complete and this scale.  As to priority, I agree that a change is needed.  The guideline I see is High: Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. Mid: Important in their discipline.  I will change it to Mid as the article makes no claim to impact outside of his country of origin. Is some further change in order? --KenWalker | Talk 01:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Politics of Lithuania

message: * Lithuania isn't a federation! —209.98.246.61 05:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-centric phrasing 

message: There should maybe be an entry about Drąsius Kedys, a Lithuanian politician recently connected in an unusual scandal involving the assassination of a corrupt judge who was allegedly part of a local child abusing network. This affair really appears to show the dark side of Lithuanian politics.  ADM (talk) 01:38, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Drąsius Kedys

message: I read the source given in the main article, Lithuania, which indicated Lithuania as a parliamentary republic, but the link which contained the text of title "On the Programme of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania" is referred as being semi-presidential, with its powers being compared to France, Poland and (of pre-2000 Constitution) Finland.
And considering that the President of Lithuania usually attends the European Council summits, it would be sensate changing the description of the form of government to semi-presidential republic. —B.Lameira (talk) 19:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics of Lithuania: parliamentary system? 
Talk:Kwun Chung

message: Are they just two names for the same place? m.e. 05:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kwun Chung is the original name. It erroneously became known as the Jordan area becuase the MTR station is named after Jordan Road instead of Kwun Chung and in HK, most people know a place because theres an MTR station. I added a note in the text indicating that Waterloo station was changed back to the original neighborhod name--Yau Ma Tei, otherwise I'm sure residents who don't live in that area would have called Yau Ma Tei, the Waterloo area. .:DavuMaya:. 07:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kwun Chung = Jordan?
Talk:Police diving

message: We have a separate article for public safety diving. There is overlap, but this is supposed to be mainly about the aspects of police diving that are unique.· · · Peter Southwood (talk): 18:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The topic is Police diving, not public safety diving
Talk:Precognition (Scots law)

message: At the end of the first sentence the phrase "trial in enjoined" looks as though it may contain a typo.  Should "in" be "is"?  I don't know enough about the subject to change it myself, but unless the phrase is a term of art, it doesn't make sense. Mary Carstairs (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Provost marshal

message: Congratulations on making it to today's listing on the "Did You Know..." section of Wikipedia Main Page.  The process of making it the listing takes a bit of effort and involves the quick cooperation of many editors.  All involved deserve recognition, appreciation, thanks and applause.
:Best Regards,
::  Bfpage |leave a message  13:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congratulations
Talk:Awards and decorations of the United States Department of the Air Force

message: This article should be a list.--Looper5920 04:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Wow! This is amazingly bereft of any truly useful information and is missing TONS of medals. I'll add more when I get a chance, but off the top of my head, DFC, CMH, Silver/Bronze star, etc are all missing. BQZip01 04:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please remember that the Distinguished Flying Cross and like are considered to be inter-service decorations are are not unique to the USAF. As such, they should not appear on the list of awards and decorations that are unique to the USAF.--Darkstar949 15:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing decorations 
Talk:Andon Zako Çajupi

message: look at http://www.geocities.com/letersi1/cajupi.html. How much can really be considered not to be copivio-ing? Circeus 14:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll admit at the outset that I was unaware of that source when I copyedited the article. That said, I feel that what's written here is a paraphrase of what's written there. It's closer to a copyvio than it should be, and with that in mind I'm planning a rewrite (this version is largely a quick-and-dirty one anyway, just to make the original text dump read better and make sense in English). Since I don't have a lick of Albanian, a rewrite is going to be a potential risk anyway, since the meaning may well get distorted, but I'll see what can be done. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: From Jorgo Bulo on him . --Sulmues Let's talk  21:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Good source
Talk:Jimmy Fratianno

message: Currently, this article claims that:
:"In 1993, Jimmy Fratianno died in Oklahoma. An autopsy performed at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Oklahoma City...."
Most of this text was added in an anonymous revision claiming to be authored by the person who performed the autopsy.
The book "WITSEC: Inside the Federal Witness Protection Program" (published 2002) claims (near the end of chapter 13) that "...in 1993, Fratianno died alone in his sleep inside his Montana house."  It is a non-fiction book, but does not list its sources, so I don't know where that information comes from.
One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that Fratianno did indeed die in Montana, but his body was transported to Oklahoma City for the autopsy, perhaps without the knowledge of the medical examiner.
Obituaries published in 1993 by the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times say only that he had been living "in an undisclosed U.S. city".
I don't feel certain enough in my information to edit the article, but thought this was worth mentioning. —Triskaideka 17:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did Jimmy Fratianno die? 

message: Throughout the article his name is given as "Aladena" but it is written as "Aladino" in the infobox. Where is that spelling sourced from? --Nicholas0 (talk) 16:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this up. You'll see the new sources I added state his given name as "Aladena"; I have also cleaned up the article in general. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aladena or Aladino?
Talk:Second Chance (body armor)

message: Anyone interested in this subject? 
My first suggestion: 
"More than 30,000 Second Chance Ballistic vests were delivered by Second Chance Body Armor GmbH to provide police officers of the Bavarian State Police and the North Rhine-Westphalia Police around 2000. About five years later, Second Chance officials said, that their ballistic vests do not provide 100 % protection after a certain amount of time. That lead to think the two police forces about a new manufacturer and to replace Second chance products. (The Bavarian Police is now provided with body armor made by Mehler Vario System , Second Chance products have been replaced)." Millions of tax money was wasted because the German branch went bancrupt and there was no refund possible."
There are many sources   but all in German, I'm afraid.
--Scriberius (talk) 15:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Providing ballistic vests to the Bavarian and North Rhine-Westphalia State Police
Talk:Air Education and Training Command Instructor Badge

message: - Why does it say [citation needed] next to the colloquial names of the badge?  How do you cite slang?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.3.45.68 (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

message: I would like to create a "Military Instructor Badges" page that would merge information from this page, the Drill Sergeant Identification Badge page, and would create information for the U.S. Navy's Recruit Division Commander Badges and the U.S. Coast Guard's Company Commander Badge.  There is little information on the Navy's and Coast Guard's instructor badges; thus, they would make poor independent pages. What thoughts or comments do you have? --McChizzle (talk) 14:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Creating a "Military Instructor Badges" Page
Talk:Steven J. McAuliffe

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Steven J. McAuliffe was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 14:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:STR analysis

message: :i removed the WP:LE tag because this article is about a forensic science not applied specifically by law enforcement officials themselves.67.189.184.147 01:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject Law Enforcement

message: article too small  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pramit57 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  insufficient information 

message: 1/19/17 DennisPietras (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved out of unassessed on the genetics project
Talk:Supreme People's Procuratorate

message: Hi, I am a university student currently undertaking a unit in Wikipedia writing. As part of this university course, I have been updating the article for the Supreme People's Procuratorate. I have made some substantial additions to this article, and was wondering if anyone would be able to have a look at the changes I have made. Any feedback would be highly welcome.
I would also like to submit this article for re-assessment, both regarding its quality and importance, however I am a new user of Wikipedia and unfamiliar with the due procedures. Any pointers would be much appreciated. Thank you!
Frangipani13 (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback and re-assessment of article
Talk:Tokubetsu Keisatsutai

message: This article has been renamed before. That the name should be spelled without a space seems to have been accepted since 2005. Tokeitai is not just a Japanese word; unfortunately, this organisation affected the lives of many people outside Japan. In the last six decades Tokeitai has become the common name to denote this organisation, not the correct romanization Tokkeitai, with double K. This can be verified on Google, but for instance also in the proceedings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. Everywhere in Wikipedia it is referred to as Tokeitai.
It is a good thing that the correct romanization with double K is pointed out in the opening line. However, in line with Wikipedia guidelines the article should keep the name Tokeitai.
♥ Stuart LaJoie → talk2me 14:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the article

message: This article has some potential, but I think it has been overlooked due to the focus paid to the Kempeitai and to a lesser extent the Tokko.  I fixed the grammar on the third paragraph, added a literal Japanese translation of the name Tokkeitai, and a littler Japanese here and there, as well as another link or two in the main body.  I also asked for more citations in the main body.  Even though my field of expertise is Asian politics, I have to admit my knowledge of the Tokkeitai is limited, and I haven't seen much published on them.  That could account for the dearth of information floating around in English.  Thoughts?
Another question, should a reference be added in the main line to the official full name of "Tokubetsu Keisatsu Tai/特別警察隊?"
I also agree on keeping the English name of the article "Tokeitai".  Although following Japanese grammar rules of double repeating consonants when shortening long words would render "Tokubetsu Keisatsu Tai" into "Tokkeitai" as far as I can tell it is very widely known as "Tokeitai".  It seems to be a historical anomaly.  As long as Wikipedia redirects people who search for "Tokkeitai" to this article, (which it does) I do not see a problem with it (though given Wikipedia's terrible internal search engine...).
Wtlegis (talk) 09:39, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: This article does not list sources and is quite frankly very inaccurate based on information available in Japanese. The subject is also too small to warrant an entire article in my opinion. I recommend either translating from the Japanese article and using those sources to improve the already existing section of Imperial Japanese Navy Land Forces which also appears to be inaccurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adachi1939 (talk • contribs) 04:49, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for deletion
Talk:Trace evidence

message: I have reverted current changes because the changes are mainly grammatical, and add very little new information. They make the article more difficult to read for the layperson by introducing unnecessary phraseology. Peterlewis 05:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, add what you added before, but remember that it needs to be in plain English, and not n convoluted language (which only confuses) Peterlewis 06:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, but I'd also like to please change the language about "match" which is incorrect terminology when dealing with trace evidence, and only appropriate with fracture matches or possibly fingerprints. Kelsimp 06:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: I have added a reference to digital traces. The exploitation of digital data should be indeed taken into account. To be added: a description about the connection logs that can be exploited to determine the (illegal ?) use of peer to peer networks to get access to copyright sounds and videos~--Nabeth (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital traces 

message: This article should be considered to be a stub. It is incomplete, addressing more or less only US references which is not worthy a thorough article (there are other countries in the world with some intellectual capacities, believe it or not). SO, as a conclusion, when you read this article, be aware that it is only scratching the surface of a rather complex field of forensic science. Do also be aware that there is a principal mix up between "forensic chemistry" and "trace evidence" eg GC for arson is classified as trace evidence whereas analysis of illicit drugs are forensic chemistry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.160.174.55 (talk) 10:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  STUB 

message: — Assignment last updated by St030302 (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Seminars in Forensic Science

message: — Assignment last updated by Lorrriana (talk) 18:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Seminars in Forensic Science

message: I feel the importance of trace evidence (found in the second paragraph of lead) should be changed to its own topic in the body of the article. As it doesn't contribute to the introduction of the topic however definitely should still be emphasized.  Enatti0108 (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location change of the importance of trace evidence
Talk:Kinetica

message: * ...is it just me or does this article sound like a press release written by an overzealous fan? 66.63.117.227 06:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Like a press release?
Talk:Use of force continuum

message: Just a note, the use of the use of force continuum during the Kent State shootings is being debated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.49.250.152 (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a note... 

message: What on earth does "Search Suspect" have to do with the Use of Force Continuum? Greenlead (talk) 10:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Search Suspect" 

message: Should tasers be included in the list of "responses" in this article?
They are very much in the news (in Australia) everytime one is used, or another Police Force issues them. Can't see what the supposed problem is. I would much rather receive an electrical shock than have a lead slug rip through my body. 
Surely they are much safer for an offender than a firearm?
Agree that the "first use of force is "officer presence",.." as stated above, also agree with Flatscans' comments
1) Physical Presence
2) Verbal Command
3) 'Touch'
4) 'Open' (or empty) Hand Technique (Armbar, strike etc)
5) 'Closed' Hand Technique ie Non lethal weapon (baton)
6) Lethal Force (firearm)
Is how I recall the Force Continuum is expressed, in state of New South Wales security guard training courses.
220.101.28.25 (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "TASER" 

message: Ryanbeddes (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources being considered for contribution to the page 

message: The article mentions the Marine Corps Specifically when explaining the use of force continuum. To be unbiased the article should explain a more basic universal domestic or federal Law Enforcement use of force continuum since the Marine corps isn't widely known as a law enforcement entity but more of a military force.Ryanbeddes (talk) 14:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Changes/Additions to article 

message: When the techniques are listed in the article it does not give definitions, for example: deadly force has a high probability of rendering a subject unconscious, permanent physical disfigurement, and or death. Each level has a specific definition.Ryanbeddes (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested improvement
Talk:Traffic collision reconstruction

message: Although this is a popular topic, the formatting on this page has been lacking. I am suggesting we adopt a few sub-sections to make the article more focused and more accessible for new readers. I will wait a few weeks for anyone's feedback. Here's my suggestion:
Vehicular Accident Reconstruction
1. History
2. Investigation: Scene inspection, data recovery, collecting evidence, photographs, measurements, etc.
3. Analysis: Processing data, evaluating possible hypotheses, creating models, recreating accidents, testing, etc.
4. Presentation: Report findings, diagrams, animations, conclusions, etc.
5. References
6. External Links
Fullrabb (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Format Update