Talk:Brodnici

message: It is wrong that Ploskânea was initially on side of Mstislav the Bold. Nothing in Chronicle about it. --Tigga en (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ploskânea

message: We are the Bodrici live n Republic of Adygeya. Our popularity is about 5000-7000. --85.26.241.6 (talk) 16:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brodnici live today 

message: Ploscânea is discussed by many historians because he participated at Kalka. Eliminating him means to eliminate
Hypathian Chronicle  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.166.130.187 (talk) 08:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: We're already discs suing him, including the possibility that his association with the Brodnici may be just an accident (a misreading of the original chronicle). The problem is that his name is originally written in Old Church Slavonic, and consequently the standard transliteration of his name in English is Ploskynya. I see no reason to render it the Romanian way, as the event he is associated with is far away from the Romanian speaking area. Anonimu (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign your comments and refer to books published in English when verifying the proper usage (as per WP:English). Borsoka (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Ii does not matter which historians and how transliterate the name arounf=d the world. What matters is how he is called in the original manuscripts and how this name transliterated in English (the language of this encyclopedia). - üser:Altenmann >t 03:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ploscânea 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brodnici. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929203924/http://www.auditorium.ru/books/242/gl5.pdf to http://www.auditorium.ru/books/242/gl5.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article is full of mumbo-jumbo edits typical of Iaaasi. For example, avoiding the consensus issued by Victor Spinei regarding the Turkic origin and inventing Romanian-Alanian origins or anything that contains "Romanian-" something. --Kun Kipcsak (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  LTA Iaaasi 

message: As of the most recent revision ... that is, the "07:47, 13 January 2023‎" revision -- footnote "[6]" consists of (it 'uses') a "ref" tag that does not actually use a "" template [instance] -- nor something like that -- but it does contain a clickable link to an "archived" version of the reliable source. 
That clickable link to an online version of the source is not exactly an "archive-URL" field value of a template field. Rather, it uses a "" template instance. 
However, I just noticed recently that ... if it were coded using an "archive-URL" ... then -- [as far as I can tell] -- now it would now be appropriate to include "| url-status = dead" since the "PRIMARY" clickable link [URL] does not work! 
Well ... it does not work for me. I wanted to check and see whether this agrees with your findings ... 
:(anyone who is willing to click on the link to the "PRIMARY" URL --  http://www.auditorium.ru/books/242/gl5.pdf [displayed as "Ch. 5, Polovtsians" in the footnote]) 
since it might just be my browser, or something. That was one of the main reasons for my decision to enter this on the "Talk:" page, instead of immediately changing the footnote (currently footnote number "[6]") in the article. 
Any comments? Mike Schwartz (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the articles here and on the Romanian Wikipedia were edited by a long-term vandal who was "specialized" in nonsense, here including erroneous, false footnotes alongside information in the same style or carefully selected. I started rewriting the article on ro.wiki based on reliable sources, some already cited, but in an incomplete form.--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 18:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  footnote in which the "archive URL" works OK, but not [the clickable link for] the "primary" URL