lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Death of a Salesman

message: Why is character analysis under "Themes"?! Poorly written. Sideriver84 (talk) 04:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Themes 

message: This is the first production featuring a Black Loman family, and should be noted as such. 
https://lithub.com/the-new-broadway-revival-of-death-of-a-salesman-features-a-black-loman-family/ 65.183.151.187 (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 Production at Hudson Theater in NYC 

message: Add citation for 2023 tony awards and change best light status from pending to nominated. 
Source: Tony Award Winners 2023: The Full List - The New York Times (nytimes.com) Awilling (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Beachy Amish

message: There are three important differences between Beachy Amish and other Amish communities not mentioned in the article:
1. The Beachy Amish no longer shun people.
2. The Beachy Amish emphasize more individuality than other Amish do. This includes Bible study groups which are not permitted in other Amish communities because the Ordnung is seen as more important than individual interpretation of the Bible.
3. The Beachy Amish empasize salvation by faith instead of salvation by works.
As a result of 1-3 they became shunned by the other Amish communities.
I don't want to add this on my own to the article since my English is not good enough.--Niwi
====Response====
I have recently left an Amish/Mennonite Church - sometime called a Beachy Church. I would like to respectfully disagree with some of the above statements.
Statement 1
Some Beachy Church, do still shun people. Just not as strongly nor as obviously. I can personally testify to this, but would agree that it is not nearly the act of Shunning the Amish practice.
Statement 2
Is factual and accurate. But could be enhanced by acknowledgment that the bible study and Sunday school activities are a major distinction.
Statement 3
In principal this statement is true. In daily life the two, faith and works, go hand in hand. One can not have faith without works, as faith in God/Jesus will produce fruit (works).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AmishPhonebook (talk • contribs) 16:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theological differences 

message: I have recently left an Amish/Mennonite Church - sometime called a Beachy Church. I would like to respectfully disagree with some of the above statements.
Statement 1
Some Beachy Church, do still shun people. Just not as strongly nor as obviously. I can personally testify to this, but would agree that it is not nearly the act of Shunning the Amish practice.
Statement 2
Is factual and accurate. But could be enhanced by acknowledgment that the bible study and Sunday school activities are a major distinction.
Statement 3
In principal this statement is true. In daily life the two, faith and works, go hand in hand. One can not have faith without works, as faith in God/Jesus will produce fruit (works).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AmishPhonebook (talk • contribs) 16:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Response
Talk:Polyester

message: Polyester is a category of polymers that contain the water functional group in every repeat unit of their main chain 103.120.51.74 (talk) 09:18, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polyester 

message: This section should have some sort of introduction before discussing the futuro house. Without context it can read as irrelevant Bdotb98 (talk) 00:50, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biodegradation and environmental concerns
Talk:Radical

message: Could a clear definition of the word 'radical' in regards to politics be explained. All talk about extreme left of right movements or 'acting in an extreme way' but provide no useful or clear information as to what being radical of extremist is. Some explanation in simple terms or describing the complicated terms would help.
Cheers Sebsf 12:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: Ok, the short definition of a chemical radical on this disambiguation page is wrong. There are two chemical meanings for a radical, and the ammonium ion fits one of them. Examine the Lewis structure of ammonium. It has no unpaired electrons. Dwmyers 04:53, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short definition of a chemical radical 

message: Timothy McVeigh was a radical conservative.Ark30inf 23:15, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timothy McVeigh 

message: Some may dispute whether the changes a political radical advocates represents true reforms.  Certainly advocates of radical change may see those changes as reforms but opponents almost certainly would not. Objectively speaking whether any political or social change can be considered a reform, radical or otherwise, is a matter for history and not really the province of those who advocate their changes as reforms. With that in mind, I modified the definition of a political radical from someone in favour of drastic reform to one who is in favour of drastic political or social change. We'll let history decide if those changes are true reforms.
Fjapinteric 14:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Radical as change rather than reform

message: The term radical is used by the right wing in the United States to describe elements of the Democratic Party Do not edit this sentence again without an explanation.  The previous version contained POV language.  Regardless of whether you feel it is a mischarictarization, it has been established as sentiment in an opposing political faction, not as encyclopedic fact.  Logically, those calling members of the democrat party radicals are not intentionally "mischaracterizing" them, they are providing what they feel is an accurate desription based on their political ideology. --NEMT 15:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: In politics

message: Some guy did a rather odd vandalism of this page. He did it under slang and talked about someone named isabelle. I just reverted it. Can't believe no one noticed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmeri18 (talk • contribs) 14:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd vandalism 

message: molecular and cell biology C.V. Springfield (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please put together an actual sentence if you would like other editors to know what you're talking about. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology 
Talk:SCARA robot

message: how much for ones?
:The question can't easily be answered because SCARA labels a class of robots, not just one specific product you can purchase. --PeterHansen 13:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Should this article be merged with the SCARA article? 
Yes, I think that they should be merged.  They are almost exactly the same.  -Gphoto 14:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Hawking radiation

message: Per this review article,  The product of the Bekenstein bound and the quantum speed limit aka Bremermann's limit is called the Bremermann–Bekenstein limit. Hawking radiation is emitted at the maximal possible rate allowed by this bound; i.e. it saturates this bound. Should be added to this article. I'd add it, but i'm busy with other stuff. So this is a todo-list item. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  TODO list 

message: Thesis by Darragh Rooney: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3917&context=etd Rudxain (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Casimir Effect
Talk:Super Fly (1972 film)

message: Why is this article titled Superfly when the film's title is Super Fly?  That is even how it is spelled on the poster, two separate words. Gr8white 04:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Title 

message: I'm working from memory on this (I saw the movie 30-odd years ago), but I believe the reference to "Pusherman" is actually "The Pusher", a song composed by Hoyt Axton and most famously performed by Steppenwolf. If this my memory is not playing tricks on me, then the link should be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pusher. Marstinson 02:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song title error? 

message: The anecdote  about the pimpmobile is hilarious but undocumented. I an reluctant to draw attention to it for fear it will disappear due to overzealous camp followers. Any body have a reference for it ?--— Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 18:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car story  

message: Reardon claims that Priest doesn't have any money for something like that as they open his briefcase. Who is Reardon?--Blaua (talk) 08:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reardon

message: It seems the article has been vandalized. I don't really have the time to fix it, though someone needs to.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.67.43.79 (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't appear to be vandalized.  A very large, out of place, original research segment that didn't belong was removed.  This is not vandalism.  KiTA (talk) 03:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: What do reliable sources say the film's budget was?
*The New York Times obituary for producer Sig Shore (2006) says "Superfly, which cost less than $100,000 and grossed more than $30 million".
*Black Film/White Money (1996) says "Superfly, with a $500,000 budget and $5 million gross in less than one year 'sets the tone for the black criminal as antihero.'"
*This biography of Curtis Mayfield by his son (2016) says "There's one other thing that the critics of Super Fly seem to miss. For the budget of less than $300,000, there isn’t that much you can do."
*The African American Lives biography of director Gordon Parks Jr. (2004) describes the film as having a "shoestring budget of $500,000".
Can anybody find other reliable sources? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film's budget? 

message: "...and gives the briefcase carrying the money to a disguised Georgia in exchange for one full of rags."
:Georgia isn't identified in the outline. Her place in the plot's scheme of things should have been previously mentioned. JohndanR (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgia?
Talk:Nine Princes in Amber

message: Wow, this reads like a book-blurb instead of like an encyclopedia to me.  Of course, I've not checked out a lot of the other book entries.  But phrases like: excellent fantasy, never really slows down, reads like greased lightning, I envy the folks that can read this for the first time., (a 'mold breaker' in the fantasy genre. well, maybe not this last phrase), read like commercial copy instead of more non-biased writing on a topic.
~ender 2003-09-10 02:54:MST
:Yep, it went against Wikipedia's policy of neutral point of view. I removed the offending bits, but keep in mind that you can fix it yourself. --Mrwojo 18:15, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Blurb

message: I don't have time to make any changes myself now, and I would prefer to do them after I read the Amber series again, but I'd like to say that I think more should be written about the book besides a plot summary and character descriptions. there should be more focus on some of the particularly interesting aspects of the book, such as the process of shadow shifting that is described in the book, or the fact that Zelazny, in making this book, has basically created a model of the entire universe (you'd know what I mean if you've read the book). I know that I want details of these things to be added because they are interesting, but these aspects of the book could still be described in detail, which wouldn't necessarily go against wikipedia policy. Also, more could also be added about the reactions that readers of the book had, criticism, etc.
Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla (talk) 07:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  shadow shifting 

message: A film or television adaptation is in talks. - Is there any confirmation or citation for this? 97.89.245.241 (talk) 18:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptation 

message: This section is three times longer than it needs to be. It should be a broad outline of the plot, not a blow by blow account of every single thing that happens.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.247.116 (talk) 20:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Section
Talk:Hua

message: -----
I think the Korean text inserted in this article is out of place.  The Chinese text is appropriate because the article talks about the Huer tribe in the context of China.  But the tribe of Huer didn't live near the Korean border, there didn't seem to be any Korean connection in this topic. User 202.30.144.91 added a comment about the Korean pronunciation on Sept 5.  I don't see how this information is relevent until someone can connect the Yangzi delta dialect with the Korean language.
The Chinese text would be useful for research to look further from Chinese source.  The Chinese text can be considered native text to this article, but the Korean text does not belong.  On the contrary, the Korean text would be appropriate for an article on Kim Chi, the Chinese text for Kim Chi would be marginal because ancient Korean literature used Hanja.  Specifying the French spelling of Kim Chi in an English wikipedia would be as out of place as the Korean text in this article.
I propose to move this Korean text into the Huer article in the Korean wikipedia.
What do you think?  12.234.73.11 10:17, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)

message: Please add the following to the list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nu_and_the_Hua_People  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.109.209.119 (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  hua of new guinea
Talk:Algebraic geometry

message: The sections of the article have become too long to the point of being offputting to a new reader, and should be reorganised. Similarly, the first section should be an introduction to the most important concepts/results in algebraic geometry and relations to other fields, not (as it is now) the first quarter of an intro AG course reproduced verbatim. - 30 July 2020  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.76.8.75 (talk) 13:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloated 

message: In the section "history" of this article, it's stated that "Each of these early developments in algebraic geometry dealt with questions of finding and describing the intersections of algebraic curves.", but this is not sourced... 
Here is a source which writes that algebraic geometry was ingurated with Sharaf al- din al-Tusi:
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Arabic_mathematics.html
"Sharaf al-Din al-Tusi (born 1135), although almost exactly the same age as al-Samawal, does not follow the general development that came through al-Karaji's school of algebra but rather follows Khayyam's application of algebra to geometry. He wrote a treatise on cubic equations, which represents an essential contribution to another algebra which aimed to study curves by means of equations, thus inaugurating the beginning of algebraic geometry."
The source cites Roshdi Rashed who is a prominent academic (bronze medal of French CNRS...) for this topic.
So i'm about to revert the ambiguous sentence about the "early developpement in algebraic geometry" and replace it by the source above but i would like to have other's editors opinion please.
2A01:E34:EE9D:A200:90E9:FDE6:16CF:3B09 (talk) 16:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This statement has been in the article and was removed in part because it was a copyright violation. Also, Rashed's opinion in this matter is clearly biased as he did the modern translation of al-Tusi's works. You would need to find a source, preferably by an expert in algebraic geometry, that supports this position. --Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 18:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developpement of Algebraic geometry 

message: The subject of tropical geometry has now developed to such an extent that it deserves some mention in this article, and this article should link to the one on tropical geometry. The phrase actually occurs in the present version, but it appears without explanation. What is needed are more elementary remarks, perhaps also a simple example and picture. Ishboyfay (talk) 06:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: More generally, the subfield of combinatorial algebraic geometry could be mentioned. Ishboyfay (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I do agree that the field has developed large enough to warrant some section. But it should not be too long because of WP:DUE. I suppose one picture (but no more!) can be allowed, in my humble opinion. —- Taku (talk) 06:29, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Logarithmic algebraic geometry is another subfield that deserves its own section. -- Taku (talk) 02:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tropical geometry should be mentioned
Talk:The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck

message: There was a link to a site that hosted scans of all the comics. While I personally really liked the site (trip down memory lane and all that), is it one giant breach of copyright. So I removed the link, as per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#Occasionally_acceptable_links , point number 5. -- Mystman666  (Talk) 18:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to all the comics 

message: I don't see how it's very relevant that the story was popular in Norway/Scandinavia, unless it was very popular in Scandinavia, but not in the rest of Europe (and some numbers can be found that support that assertion). I'll remove the "popularity" comments tomorrow if no one objects (going on vacation the day after that)-- Mystman666  (Talk) 18:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity in various countries. 

message: Uncle Scrooge lives forever. Erudil 17:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that link, Kizor. Bones O'Malley (talk) 17:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: We do not believe in the death of McDuck

message: Why do they republish the stories in the order published, that is, one two-volume set for the trade volume and one for the companion? Couldn't they have put the stories into chronological order and published all of it as "The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck", in one or two volumes? I'd have loved either one or two hardcovers, since I like thick books - but I'm certainly not about to pay for four, with no significant advantage over the original.
Stop squeezing money out of Don Rosa and start paying him some!
(Sorry about the rant, wrong forum, it just happened.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.21.74.119 (talk) 22:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Don himself asked the publishers to do it that way, because the companion stories have a different flow and style from the original series. For instance, all the companion stories have a framing story that takes place in the present time, that is DRDPT, or Don Rosa Duckburg Present Time, which are the 1950s. That's why, according to Don, they can only publish it as Lo$ (Life of $crooge) Original Storyline on the one hand, and Lo$ Companion separately on the other. --2.240.185.54 (talk) 04:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rant. 
Talk:Engelsism

message: *Engelsism is a real ideology. You'll see that when people all across the world are writing about it!/Bosse
The following articles are proposed for deletion.
#Engelsist - original contents were Engelsist = a follower of Engelsism. (already deleted by User:Schneelocke)
**Was just recreated by same author, and again changed the dictionary dfinition to be a redirect to Engelsism
#Engelsism - now redirected to Marxism
#OA - OA is a Swedish author. He is the creater of the Engelsism. A is the leader of the Revolutionary Engelsist Society in Sweden.
#JN - JN is a socialist who lives in Linköping in Sweden. He is one of the creators of Engelsism.
#JJ - JJ is a political person who lives in Linköping in Sweden. J is strongly against homosexual people, even if he is a member of the Engelsist movement. The Engelsists aren't against homosexuals at all.
#Engelsia, a revolutionary story
*OA, Engelsism and Engelsist - seems to be nonsense, no google hits (except for Engelsism being kind of a synonym for Marxism). andy 13:48, 8 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: One question: Why was the keywords "engelsism", "engelsist" and "OA" deleted? I thought they were interresting? And I know that they were true too. Please contact me, ez@hotbrev.com . /E ----
* JN, Engelsism - failed Google test. -- Schnee 22:26, 10 Sep 2003 (UTC)

text: Seriously.  I think it has become obvious -- to everyone except the one or two anonymous users who keep recreating them -- that these articles are nonsense.  (I've got to say that leaving nonsense in an encyclopedia sounds like it will only make the project look foolish.)  Is it possible for all of these to be made into redirects and then protected?  Is that allowed?  -- Paige 21:17, 17 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text:  made to redirects to where? Martin 10:21, 19 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps to the Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense pages? :)  Either way, if the policy is that these can be "shot on sight" from now on, that's a much better solution; I just didn't know that was a policy.  Paige 16:13, 19 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion
Talk:Dornier Do 17

message: Some of the chapters give Imperial units and some metric units first when mentioning the speed of the plane, could someone edit them to be in consistent order? And since this is German (European) plane, I propose to standard view of metric units first.
--86.115.22.83 (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in units order for speed between chapters 

message: Apparently an airborne flamethrower was mounted experimentally on some Do-17s  
https://www.key.aero/forum/historic-aviation/35945-luftwaffe-airborne-flamethrower
Would be worth writing up if someone can verify some of the following references
* Flypast, approximately November 2003
* Sky Spy - autobiography of Ray Holmes who shot down one such plane
StacksofHoy (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airborne Flamethrower
Talk:Josh Zee

message: No google hits for "Josh Zee" "Marc Bonilla". Following text was removed pending verification:
:He was quite possibly taught by/influenced by Marc Bonilla, a guitar teacher. 
-- Tim Starling 02:15, Sep 11, 2003 (UTC)
Results of deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Josh Zee DJ Clayworth 16:42, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Please zee josh new channel release date fastway 223.178.209.252 (talk) 09:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey