Talk:History of Rajputs

message: The term Rajput came in existence in seventh century. The earlier history of period prior to this needs to be expanded. burdak 02:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The term Rajput came in existence in seventh century. The earlier history of period prior to this needs to be expanded with proper references. 
Thakur Deshraj is one of the prominent Historians from Rajasthan. He has mentioned about Rajputs in his book on Jat history page 113-114, w.r.t Imperial Gazetteer of India  Vol 2 (page 307-308),
:"Then between the 7th and 8th centuries the old racial divisions passed away and a new division came in founded upon status and function....
:The rise of Rajputs determined the whole political history of time. They made their first appearance in 8-9th centuries; most of the greatest clans took possession of their seats between 800 and 850 AD. ... Their origin is a subject of much dispute." (Imperial Gazetteer of India Vol 2 p.308))
When Rajput word was not created and was not in use prior to 9th century how they are related with Rama or Pandawas. We need proper references.burdak (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Rajput 

message: tell us about how this cast came in muslim history,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.29.99 (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  how it enter in muslim history 

message: HUSNAN RAFIQUE JASYAL RAJPUT BHIMBER AK  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.66.9 (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  JASYAL RAJPUT 

message: WAQAS RAFIQUE JASYAL RAJPUT BHIMBER AK
PAKISTAN  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.175.66.9 (talk) 13:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  JASYAL RAJPUT 

message: As per James Todd there were rajput kings in Rajasthan belongs to Yaduvanshi Ahirthe history of rajput by james todd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.71.160 (talk) 04:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  many rajputs kinf of rajasthan were yaduvanshi ahirs 

message: Following on from the work of MatthewVanitas, referred to above, I am likely to massively prune this article unless someone can at least turn into proper citations, per WP:CITE, some of the items mentioned in the Sources sections. The article may be correct but it is impossible for the reader to be sure. - Sitush (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further clean up 

message: User:Sitush recently cleaned blanked the article's section : Rajput resistance to Muslim invasions. The section is present since the very beginning of the article. The article remains incomplete without this section. So, unreferenced tags shud remain there, but the section shud be restored. I will try to provide references as well. SubQuad (talk) 12:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved this thread to the end of this page, for chronological reasons. Please note that if you reinstate anything that is unsourced then I will remove it again. The content has been dire for far too long and I gave plenty of notice of what the likely outcome would be unless someone could get to grips with the issues. - Sitush (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent cleanup by Sitush

message: ::Since this article is rapidly approaching Stub status, might it not be time to simply merge it into Rajput, redirect-and-salt? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposing merge