Talk:Idiom

message: The idiom “To make clean breast of ” is used to
A. gain prominence B. praise oneself 
C. Confess without any reserve. D. destroy before it blooms
 Choose the correct answer. Jayanth2642000 (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which one is idiom 

message: Can someone please meantion the relation between idiomaticity and the use of articles? --Backinstadiums (talk) 09:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor seems to mean definite and indefinite articles like "the" and "a".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.57.15 (talk) 11:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

text: ijh higy u j jjhcjukh ui9j jh  hj hihj vsdfgniosakarau jn 2601:283:4E80:CAC0:3751:404B:686F:BF1A (talk) 00:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* English-English dictionaries and thesaurus books.JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The section on dealing with non-compositionality writes about the "catena". This section was written by User:Tjo3ya. This user is the researcher who has proposed the "catena" concept. This lead to an issue of possible WP:COI / WP:ADVOCACY on the Catena (linguistics) page. The same issue appears here, and probably in many other places. Kaĉjo (talk) 08:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV issue with catenas 

message: यह मेरा प्रश्न है मुझे समझ नहीं आ रहा है 2409:4053:799:7774:0:0:72E:38B0 (talk) 10:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ask at hi.wikipedia.org for Hindi. In English a contraction is a combination of two words while omitting some letters.PrisonerB (talk) 10:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  व्हाट इज Contracted forms 

message: The following section was deleted on 2 December 2008 due to vandalism. Maybe it should be inserted again?
== Parlance ==

"Idiom" can also refer to the characteristic manner of speaking in a language, also called its parlance. An utterance consistent with a language's parlance is described as idiomatic. For example, "I have hunger" is idiomatic in several European languages if translated literally (e.g. Dutch ik heb honger, German ich habe Hunger; French j'ai faim; Spanish tengo hambre; Italian ho fame, Portuguese tenho fome), but the usual English idiom is "I am hungry".
This sense is also carried over to programming languages, where the former sense does not apply, as an expression or statement in  contenging a programming language can generally have only one meaning. For example, in Haskell, it is possible to apply a function to all members of a list using recursion, but it is more idiomatic to use the higher-order function map.
— Anton Maienfeldt (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rescuing "Parlance" section 

message: Bass 41.114.255.59 (talk) 11:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics 

message: Could we have a section that enumerates things that could be confused with idioms, but really are not?
* proverbs (they're a whole sentence)
* jargon, slang (does an idiom need to be more than one word?)
* metaphors and similes
* There's a link to "figures of speech" somewhere, but that term is so vague that I don't know that it's very helpful.
Lehasa (talk) 01:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinctions - things not idiomatic 

message: "In linguistics, idioms are usually presumed to be figures of speech contradicting the principle of compositionality."
This section is rather unclear because obviously, dealing with an idiom involves different rules to compose a meaning from the idiomatic statement (than a reader of the statement would apply), which even may dictate to take the idiom as a lexial item (like it being a figure of speach).  I might go as far as to argue that this section basically contradicts the first sentence it starts with; and a better explanation is in order.  (I won't dare any attempt to give one since the "principle of compositionality" appears to me like just an idea and as a method amongst many other methods which may be resonably applied or not, depending on the particular case.  It is not guaranteed and not evident that applying the principle of compositionality to a statement will always necessarily arrive at what could be considered "truth", though it might arrive right there --- or not.  And keep in mind that truth may lie in the eye of the beholder, and not anywhere else.)
Simply put, idioms and figures of speach do not contradict the principle of compositionality because the principle does not dictate what the rules are; it only requires rules.
185.140.253.154 (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compositionality 

message: "The types of movement allowed for certain idioms [...]"
Which types are those, and which ones aren't allowed?  Like is moving 'kicking the bucket' and 'spilling the beans' to 'putting beans into buckets' (see above) allowed or not?  After all, it's a semantically meta-compositional(!) idiom you can easily understand compositionally when you know how it has been brought about and more semantically when you don't know (though you may end up with contradictory meanings): This article has put (spilled?) its beans into buckets, and I better stop reading it now ...
185.140.253.154 (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobility 

message: To make this section more understandable, someone please explain what the relation between catenae and idioms is.  For example:
"Rapidly shoving the heavy closet over the carpet is pulling its leg."
Apparently that somehow would constitute an idiom since the words are there.
185.140.253.154 (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dealing with non-compositionality