lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frank Howard (American football)

message: On the page of "Darryl Hill (American football player)" it is mentioned that Howard would not allow a black player in Clemson's stadium, and threatened to remove the school from the ACC. Shouldn't this be relevant to an article like this, specifically because of the time frame he coached in, during the Civil Rights Era?174.126.239.232 (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: YES.  The article as currently written is so POV that it smacks of hagiography.  This fact, although a flaw in Howard's record, needs to be included, but doesn't seem to be particularly well-referenced in the Darryl Hill article and would really need to be in this article.2600:1004:B158:1997:C433:4B60:E40B:5451 (talk) 00:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Howard and racial attitudes 

message: Look at this. http://www.clemsontigers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=209444446 A huge chunk of the article is lifted from here. I don't know whether to nuke it and start from scratch or what. --ShorinBJ (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: The redirect Coach Howard has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Coach Howard]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20040805034504/http://clemsontigers.collegesports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/howard_frank00.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  19:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Požega, Croatia

message: In 1532, after Sultan Suleiman's siege of Güns/Kőszeg, he marched across Habsburg lands to Graz, and then turned to march home. During his march across Slavonia, his soldiers raided and attacked places, including Požega. 
Celâlzâde Mustafâ Çelebi's account of events is translated to Hungarian here.  Maybe someone will translate to English. 
https://books.google.ca/books?id=e_9BAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA218 ZidarZ (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suleiman's attack in 1532 - if anyone is interested
Talk:Bill Mallory

message: Here are some possible images to use for this article:
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/22245d36e5ef79ae155a1d4fdd7396dd8b8ffcc2/c=0-88-2040-2808/local/-/media/2018/05/25/Cincinnati/Cincinnati/636628712827521627-GettyImages-295595.jpg?width=534&height=712&fit=crop
http://media.graytvinc.com/images/810*563/MALLORY2.jpg
https://www.gcdailyworld.com/photos/15/26/04/1526042-L.jpg
https://cdn-otf-cas.prfct.cc/dfs1/eyJ3IjozODAsImgiOjM4MCwiZCI6NzIsInVybCI6Imh0dHA6XC9cL2FkYXMtb3JlZ29uLWNhcy1vYml0cy5zMy5hbWF6b25hd3MuY29tXC9waG90b3NcL2NyZWF0ZV9zdG9yeVwvNWIxNTc1Y2E2MmFiZlwvNDZkMjg5ZGVkYjYwNGU4YzAzYjhmNWUzOTk5NS5qcGcifQ==
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/bill-mallory-he-wont-be-scapegoatl-picture-id162025459?k=6&m=162025459&s=612x612&w=0&h=cZlbLTPNjIzZ8DR1yeEMt_TYDV3QmA9JnA2KEObRyU4=
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/news-herald.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/c/98/c9865d7b-80cc-5f10-b7e5-ab65971e6482/5b91c1d2ac45a.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C1046
Matt Campbell (talk) 22:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Images to use
Talk:Bill McCartney

message: I just read this on Sports Illustrated online: "At Colorado, under the God-fearing Bill McCartney (who would leave coaching after the 1994 season to found the Christian men's group Promise Keepers), Buffaloes football players ran amok to such a degree that a school policeman told SI's Rick Reilly, "At the first home football game of every season, a couple of detectives drop by the stadium and pick up a few programs. Saves you time. Instead of having a victim go through the mug book, you just take out your program and say, 'Is he in here?'"" Is there more on these issues and should they be integrated into criticisms? --Bobak 17:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More source of controversy? 

message: Calling it "non-neutral" by putting it in is just plain wrong. Everyone who watched college football in that era knows he still would've scored despite the "clip" which occured AFTER the Rocket was already past the "clipee and clipper" (if that makes sense). There was a big stink about it for weeks after the game, so why SHOULDN'T it be in there? seattlehawk94 15:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is better now with the citations.  The usage of "thanks" here is a little colloquial and could be conveyed as sarcastic in tone, which compromises neutrality.  I've edited the copy and formatting a bit.  Thanks for researching the references. Jweiss11 (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocket PR "TD" 
Talk:Les Miles

message: Should we go ahead and update Les's photo to one of his more recent pics in KU colors? I get that he had his successful period at LSU, but he is KU's head coach right now and it is maybe a bit disrespectful to them if we don't update it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:E231:3340:44DB:F73A:E726:2E9F (talk) 18:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: profile photo change?

message: Record should be 131-50 (according the link cited and math)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Verouchi (talk • contribs) 14:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Times-Picayune article I cited stated that "lsu and michigan officials said....".  They then provided a quote from a Michigan official.  At least one person at Michigan apparently felt they should quickly correct the rumor.  Unfortunately the article was updated and the reporter apparently felt that what LSU and Miles were stating made the Michigan official's statement irrelevant, i.e. not worth mentioning, much less discussing.  Mdlawmba 07:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Islamic Way of Life

message: I have withdrawn thsis book from the nomination for deletion.  As I understand it an admin has to remove the banner.  Sufficient work has been done to assert notability, though I would like to see the book review cited and have added a tag for that Fiddle Faddle 16:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Whiteknights Park

message: The intro para states:
:Whiteknights Park ... represents the manor of Earley Whiteknights
In what sense can a university campus or park 'represent' a manor. Are we saying the park is coterminous with the old manor, or what?. -- Chris j wood 16:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Verica Atrebatum 17:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll say that. -- Chris j wood 13:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whiteknights Park ... represents the manor of Earley Whiteknights 

message: The university have announced their new development plan for Whiteknights campus, which I guess ought to be added in to the article. I don't have time right now, so if someone else wants to have a go the info is all here. There is also a consultation, so Reading folk might want to have a look and submit some comments. Eve 21:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New development plan 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bridges Hall. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 8#Bridges Hall until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.   talk 10:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bridges Hall" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Gil Dobie

message: I've seen a list of the ten longest unbeaten college football streaks in a sports almanac from about ten years ago that confirms Washington's 63 game unbeaten streak as being the longest . . . if I still had the almanac, I'd have used that reference as a citation.  I would think that current versions of the sports almanac still have a listing of the top unbeaten streaks, so perhaps someone else can replace the link reference with a book citation.  At any rate, here's a list of the top five culled from a Google Groups posting (it does jibe with my recollection):
School                                       	Years	No.	Record	Spoiler	Score
1907-17 |  63 |   59-0-4 |  California | 27-0	     	   	      	       	
1901-05 |  56 |   55-0-1 |  Chicago  |  2-0  	     	   	      	       	
1920-25 |  50 |   46-0-4 |  Olympic  |  15-0 	     	   	      	       	
1953-57 |  48 |   47-0-1 |  NotreDame |  7-0 	     	   	      	       	
1885-89 |  48 |   47-0-1 |  Princeton | 10-0 	     	   	      	       	
Myasuda 18:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I attached references in the article to an on-line almanac  that includes this list.  Myasuda (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 63 game unbeaten streak
Talk:Patrick Bertoletti

message: There should be a list of wins and qualification titles etc... here. (Xsxex 16:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Para USA

message: This strikes me as advertising.--OldCommentator 17:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Para-Ordnance are world respected handguns. Read the reviews from third party magazines: Magazine reviews PianoKeys 19:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  yeah and the DB-9 got great reviews from 3rd party magazines, they just don't mention that it explodes with +p.Dreg102 16:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

text: This article was not written by Para-Ordnance. PianoKeys 19:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: Does Para-Ordnance still exist or has it been replaced or merged with Para-USA? Our infobox includes weblinks for each, but both go to the same Para-USA website. I can't find much info on their website. The 2015 catalog mentions a 2013 "relaunch" but there's not a trace of Para-Ordnance or anything Canadian. Rezin (talk) 02:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It took some digging but I found a 2012 article which says that "It was just a couple of years ago that Para Ordnance packed its bags in Canada and moved to North Carolina to become a totally U.S. company, Para USA." So it appears that the company has changed names. Given that fact, the article should be moved as well. And some rewriting, as the article currently implies there are two companies. Rezin (talk) 02:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Except for the URL, Para-USA.com, everything on the website and the 2014 and 2015 catolgs refers to "PARA", all caps, no "-USA". Based on what was done with "Glock", there's probably a rule against all-caps company names. Para is a disambiguation page, so I suppose this page should probably be Para (firearms), unless the common use of "Para-USA" is so strong it overrides the company's preference. Also, while this company is owned by the Freedom Group through at least a couple of layers of corporations and LLCs, it has the same CEO, George Kollitides. That'd mean co-founder Thanos Polyzos is out. Rezin (talk) 02:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: A 2014 press release refers to "Para USA, LLC"  All of the recent press reports about the Liam Neeson thing seem to use "Para USA". I'll go with that. It's official and common. Rezin (talk) 02:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the lead just based on your posts, but I didn't change anything else. I don't know the first thing about guns, so I don't want to risk any misunderstandings about what guns Para-Ordnance made vs. what Para US is currently making. – Robin Hood  (talk) 03:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you so much - I ran out of time last night. You did a fine job. Rezin (talk) 17:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Para-Ordnance vs Para-USA
Talk:List of PlayStation 2 online games

message: At the moment, the page uses a list format and is split into sections based on the date it was taken down. While the server shutdown date is interesting, I think it might be better if the page used a table format like other online game lists of that generation such as List of Xbox network games. List of Dreamcast online games, and GameCube online functionality. Shutdown date can still be included in a column, and the table format would allow for easier presentation and sorting of information. It would also mean that any fan server information can be put into its own cell per-game.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casuallynoted (talk • contribs) 06:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformat

message: Is Killzone really terminated? It's listed on the playstation website as being active still. http://playstation2.onlineconsoles.com/phpBB2/content_gameslist_na.php  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.54.143.120 (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Killzone

message: I added this list to the Wikiproject for games.  Maybe it'll attract some attention and expand. AdamBiswanger1 17:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added

message: How is Final fantasy X a network game?? There was no online content with that game AT ALL.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.50.200 (talk) 01:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FFX

message: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas never had an online mode for Playstation 2, and the PC version only had online with the help of a mod that was not made by Rockstar Games. I don't see why it would be on this list  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.55.32 (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Talk:The Black Company (novel)

message: As someone who read the book a while ago and was looking to catch up before I read the second, I was looking for some more detail on the Taken (who died and how, for example).  I'd be willing to add it in, I suppose--just a few more words--if no-one objects.  (Lordjim13 11:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Character detail 

message: Although I by no means want to get into an edit war, I really do think we should try and keep the section titles the way they have been outlined in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels (see the Template).  Specifically, I'm talking about the "Plot summary" and "Characters in "The Black Company"" headings.  This doesn't mean there can't be other headings not listed in the template (such as the "Background" heading), but the whole point of the novel project is consistency.  Any objections?  - Runch 17:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition to having no objections, I am all in favor of consistency.—Asatruer 19:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't know there was a template. No problem (though I find it silly to have the title repeated). Funny thing is, I've edited lots of novel articles, and not one of them followed the guidelines. Clarityfiend 22:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem - just pointing it out.  Maybe the old articles were created before the Novel Wikiproject got popular, or maybe they're just in need of updating! ;-)  - Runch 00:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Headings
Talk:Full Spectrum Warrior: Ten Hammers

message: I added a bunch of categories, tied this to the video game project and did an info box, but the article itself could stand a re-write. Ace of Sevens 17:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: I think it's odd that the British stereotypes are blamed on what Americans usually think of when thinking of the British.  Didn't these Brits that complained notice that the Americans were just as stereotyped?  You have your Southern hayseed, your tough talkin mo'fo from the hood and all the command officers are the typical steady action hero voice.  Maybe the British believe that's what all Americans are like as well?--66.240.89.45 14:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stereotypes

message: "There was a disclaimer on the back of the video game case "Disc made in Mexico," which has contributed to the bugs and glitches."
This part has been added, removed and added again. Even if this disclaimer is on the game case, how does the disclaimer contribute to bugs and glitches? I think what is meant here is "there are many bugs and glitches because the disk was made in Mexico", but that doesn't seem very objective.
I'm deleting the part again, please do not add it again without discussing it here.
El Bandano 10:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The game didn't come on magnetic media though but on optical discs. 78.54.41.146 (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disc made in Mexico 

message: I changed the weapon used by the British to the HK33, after playing the game and noticing it was not the FN FAL as was previously stated. Also changed the grenade launcher on said weapon to the HK79, and added links and info to all weapons and the SA80.
Tim Park1983 13:42 GMT September 11th 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Park1983 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: British Weapons

message: I've removed the large section of criticisms as most of them were POV and completely unsourced. It was rife with weasel words like "many gamers." I felt the section wasn't well written or sourced and decided to be bold and remove it. Perhaps if a notable source makes mention of these grievances, it can be replaced, but then, it must be a reliable source and must be properly noted. PowderedToastMan (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Criticisms
Talk:Anthony Marreco

message: ++Lar: t/c 17:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:JW Marriott Panama

message: This page is intended to be similar to the other wiki pages at Trump International Hotel and Tower.  These properties are an important subsection at Donald Trump.
Tony The Tiger 17:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the Wikipedia manual of style as well as the neutrality guidelines.  Thanks. -20:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The number of floors is not known. Mr. Trump, has for at least one other of his buildings, claimed that a building to have more floors than they actually have.   86.132.90.95 (talk) 09:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Floor 

message: Can't we find a photo that more clearly shows the shape of the building ? -- Beardo (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: There is a significant legal controversy pertaining to Trump's management of the condos. Shouldn't there be some mention for the sake of neutrality?  Note that this is not about the person or the candidate, it is about the this building. There are many stories out there and these are just two.
http://www.voanews.com/content/panama-condo-owners-to-trump-youre-fired/3002161.html
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2015/11/04/trump-demands-75m-from-panama-condo-owners-who-fired-him/
Arbalest Mike (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the article now that there has been a legal resolution regarding the hotel (and taken the opportunity to reorder it and add/correct info from the existing references). Any recent press about the status of the residential condos, or renaming? Yngvadottir (talk) 08:14, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This content should be covered   Andrevan@ 21:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section
Talk:Yourself!Fitness

message: AFAIK, this title was not released in PAL areas and the EU, and is probably a US-only title. Can someone confirm this? 194.109.22.149 10:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PAL/EU release (or lack thereof) 

message: Perhaps some mention should be made of the sequel, and the legal mess created. http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/news/yourselffitness-developer-suing-ubisoft-for-no-less-than-26-million/?biz=1 --41.241.221.104 (talk) 14:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My Fitness Coach is a port with enhancements, not a sequel. It would be interesting to learn how the lawsuit ended, since the game was obviously published. Argel1200 (talk) 01:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequel
Talk:Nikolai Panin

message: I've announced this article's creation at Portal:Russia/New article announcements. --Fang Aili talk 17:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Russia 

message: Can somebody look up a year of bith? there are 3 given in the article! Circeus 18:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually only 2 were listed (1871/72), with a 3rd (1874) given in an external link. I couldn't figure out which was right. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation didn't even know for sure (listing 1871 or 1872). Database Olympics lists his birthdate as 1/1/1874, but we can't be sure about their sources either. --Fang Aili talk 18:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't think birth date uncertainty merits a  tag; there are many notable people who don't have verified birth dates or years. --Fang Aili talk 19:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The category listing is for 1874. Circeus 19:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, you're right. I removed it. --Fang Aili talk 19:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradicting birth dates

message: Err.. Is it me or is there something wrong with one of the statements in this article? It says that his student, Fyodor Datlin, was the first athlete to win a rating in the Unified Sports Classification System of the USSR, on December 31, 1903, while the USSR was formed in 1923, some 20 years afterwards. The USCS of the USSR was formed even later. //Halibutt 19:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I got that from the listed source. Maybe they're referring to a pre-USSR version of the classification system (same rules, different name?). --Fang Aili talk 19:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps and perhaps not. Anyone able to confirm that? //Halibutt 22:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  USSR in 1903 