Talk:Yaroslav the Wise

message: Please see the discussion of this on Grand Prince of Kiev. 
Generally, Kiev should be left as is.
--Nasageek16 (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Change "Kiev" to "Kyiv"

message: The grammar is atrocious, I'm sure I'm not the only one who found it impossible to comprehend.
: Concur. It now reads: "As been known except own dust of prince in 1939 there were displayed the remains of unknown woman without head and the man’s skull, which possibly belonged to the famous ruler’s son. This time in the tomb, that had been uncovered at court, medical experts and anthropologists presence, there was nothing but a chest with prince ashes. Skeletons that mentioned in a record of 1939 disappeared.[6]" It was not written by a native speaker of English, and I don't know what they're trying to say. 71.171.89.90 (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Grave

message: I have readded this image as it is quite obvious that the tomb of the subject of the article is relevant, if anything the other images are less relevant. Arniep 15:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tomb image

message: Please check Talk:Vladimir_I_of_Kiev#.22Trydent.22_of_Vladimir_.28Volodymer.29_and_Co, it appeares the crets are original research abakharev 10:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crests 

message: It's strongly recommended to read some Kievan Rus sources and to find that wearing a beard was a normal practice in that period. No matter what Ukranian nationalists and other people who are not friendly with history think about it.--91.76.142.167 22:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beard of Yaroslav 

message: My encyclopaedia says that the mercenary Varangians had the decisive role in the victory over Svatopelk--Revery (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varangians 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Yaroslav reconstruction01.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Well, what made Yaroslav "wise"? There's no explanation here how he got his epithet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.92.237 (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  epithet  

message: Maybe, Grand Prince of Kyiv (Kiev) and Prince of Novgorod! View: "Велий кънязь КыЂвьскии" and "Князь Новогородьскии".
Князівна (користувач)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Князівна (talk • contribs) 14:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Prince of Kiev and Novgorod? 

message: Article leads are supposed to have one (1) extra pronunciation... rarely you will see two. This article has FIVE and it really clutters the lead. With this many they should all go in prose in a "names" section. Goodness the second sentence even adds two more. A total mess of names. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead is ridiculous 

message: Kyiv not Kiev Bohdan Martynets (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in historical articles. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2022 

message: It seems most of the lead was written by an editor now indeffed for using AI chatbots to add to the leads of a bunch of articles including this one. I did notice something looked off about the text they added (also without any wikilinks). Mellk (talk) 01:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore, you want to remove the whole paragraph and create a new one? Raulois (talk) 00:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is not necessary. It needs to be checked for mistakes and that it correctly summarizes the information. Mellk (talk) 04:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chatbots