lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Knee highs

message: Catholic school girls!  How terribly American.  I thought we were trying to make Wiki much more international.  Knee-high stockings (or socks) were and are worn by many nationalities, usually by females up to the point in secondary (high) school when peer-pressure causes a more "grown-up" dress code.  In many forms of national dress knee-high socks are a fundamental part.  Furthermore, knee-high socks are worn by males also - traditionally most school boys wore short trousers with knee high knitted socks.  The presentation of a boys first pair of long-legged-trousers was seen as a sign of growing maturity.  So can we please have this article rewriten to remove the Americanisation and the subliminal sexualisation that only female clothing is being described.  rturus (talk) 16:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

message: It appears as though this article is describing knee high nylons, with the statement: "They are generally made of nylon or other pantyhose material."
Later in the article it seems as though the article is describing knee high socks, with the statement:
"They also keep legs warm in the winter months and are very comfortable to wear."
Are we describing both in one article? Seems like two different topics.
Also, "comfortable to wear" seems like a biased opinion and feels unnecessary and “…and are becoming more popular...” might need to site a reference.
I’m a newb, btw, so please let me know if any of this is out of line.
Drewmutty (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nylons vs. Socks 

message: Perhaps this picture isn't that, but I can't tell from the picture that it isn't. It's also not possible to tell whether the person is a minor or not. Was there consent given for this image? I know it is not forbidden for "disturbing content" to be on Wikipedia. There must certainly images more informative and not controversial and possibly illegal like this one.
If this is an image of a stranger this image also implicitly communicates intimidation, which is not welcoming to women. Wallby (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for an image that doesn't look like it's a stranger taking pictures of women in public
Talk:Devonshire Mall

message: This article is full of marketing, I suspect it was written by the owner company of the mall. For example, it claims to "dominates the retail landscape in Windsor and the lower southern expanse of Ontario". Having worked at both this mall, and live in Windsor, I can tell you that this is not the case. 24.57.165.8 (talk) 05:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

message: There is no mention as to whether you have  mobility scooters for rent.
Do you?
DW 184.147.148.228 (talk) 16:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scooters for rent for people with mobility issues.
Talk:Fairview Mall

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Cadillac Fairview malls.  --Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadillac Fairview mall articles name discussion 
Talk:Montezuma (Graun)

message: The spelling of the family name Stephenson for the singer Alexander Stephenson in the MONTEZUMA (Graun) article is incorrect. I am the singer referred to in the article and I sang the premiere in question in Boston. The correct spelling for my family name should read: Stevenson. I do not know what the source for the incorrect spelling is, but even if it was the programm for the performance, then it, too, is incorrect. 
Sincerely, Alexander Stevenson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brauce A.Stevenson (talk • contribs) 10:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montezuma (Graun)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)/Atlanta task force

message: Hello there! Welcome to the Atlanta task force. It's pretty dead right now as far as I can tell, but I wanted to try to freshen things up a little bit and give it another shot. It seems like there's a good base here already; the portal and project page are in good shape and lots of articles have been tagged. There's some assessing and prioritizing to be done, but much of it has been already. I blanked this page and archived everything that was on it here to give us a fresh start. I've been looking around and have some ideas, but would love to hear from others. If you're interested in helping out, respond here or on my talk page. I'm pretty new to editing, so any expertise is welcome!  ThunderBacon (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welcome! 

message: The discussion here, at Talk:Leo Frank, may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of interest

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 21:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]] 

message: There's currently an RfC at Talk:Fani Willis#RFC: alleged misuse of funds about whether allegations from a former employee of Fani Willis should be covered in the article. Editors are invited to participate. TarnishedPathtalk 10:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Fani Willis#RFC: alleged misuse of funds]]
Talk:David Bernstein (executive)

message: I can't make head or tail of the following:
Bernstein departed Manchester City and was succeeded as chairman by John Wardle. The exact reason for his departure was believed to be down to "excessive spending", something Bernstein warned Manchester City to be wary of after Peter Swales financial gambles he often took to give City impetus to challenge for trophies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.216.31 (talk) 19:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear

message: I am at a loss as to why a reference to his religion is 'unnecessary'. If there is a category for English Jews then a reference supporting this is valid?--Egghead06 (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved further down the page which is better than previously when the info was either unreferenced or just deleted as unnecessary.--Egghead06 (talk) 13:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish
Talk:David Bishop (rugby, born 1960)

message: What is the "Chris Jarman incident"? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Jarman incident? 
Talk:Hobnail

message: The actual quote is "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." I have no idea where 70.24.10.146 got their quote, but it's not right, it's not attributed, and I'm taking it out. Emoticon (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1984

message: Two things were removed from the article. The first was a remark about characters being described as wearing hobnail boots to indicate toughness. This is textbook original research, and has no place in an article.
The second was a long list of utterly trivial mentions of hobnail and hobnail boots. None of these has any importance whatsoever, and their presence adds nothing to an encyclopedic treatment of the subject. It's a a mixed bag of characters that wear such boots (is it worth mentioning that a character wears a hat in the hat article? Of course not), and mere mentions of the word. I am aghast that these have persisted so long. Mintrick (talk) 05:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: * The ref is http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/rn/podcast/2012/08/bdn_20120801_1428.mp3 , which is a 3-and-a-bit-minute audio (no video) mostly about Walter Hunt inventing safety pins. It says briefly in passing that he "invented hobnails for boots", not that "he invented hobnailed boots"; but people were putting hobnails or similar on footwear long before that. Perhaps he invented a new shape of hobnail? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walter Hunt's invention
Talk:Londonderry Mall

message: I removed "Having undergone a $140 million expansion and renovation in 1992, Londonderry Mall has a spacious interior, comfortable decor and warm, friendly atmosphere," as found word-for-word on the Londonderry Mall website: http://www.londonderrymall.com/mallinfo.html
75.156.156.10 (talk) 01:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Morning dress

message: Just an idea: Should we distinguish between that which is given by formality versus that which is a matter of style, (subsets being which style in which era and why) ?
The specification of the type of dress seems to be quite short: Tail coat, waistcoat, trousers, top hat.
Style: Trousers no turn ups with a lower hem at the back. 
Style: Colors: Black, Grey. Sometimes black tail coat, striped trousers black/grey.
Style: What wearers of morning dress wear to state occasions, and why
Style: What wearers of morning dress wear to weddings, and why
V gergiev (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matters of Formality versus Matters of Style 

message: I only see one wife in the Reagan picture....151.151.21.103 (talk) 20:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wives? 

message: Why does this not mention women's versions at all? It should have at least more than one sentence on the topic???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Persept (talk • contribs) 01:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's morning wear? 

message: I translating the article to Hebrew, and the same things are written again and again.
we need to summarize this article. שטרודל מאן (talk) 07:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the article is repeat on itself
Talk:Marlborough Mall

message: The 2000s map needs to be fixed; the one anchor (Sears) hasn't gone by the Simpsons Sears name for years.
24.79.211.232 (talk) 02:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Ceremonial dress

message: Despite being important this article looks overlooked. To any brave soul who wishes to help this might be of use: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40316636.pdf. It details different cultural traditions for Ceremonial dress and is an excellent source. Good luck thou chiefs. Des Vallee (talk) 07:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This subject seems overlooked and ways to fix it 

message: The redirect Ceremonial Clothing in Judeo-Christian Cultures has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Nat Gertler (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ceremonial Clothing in Judeo-Christian Cultures]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Black lounge suit

message: It would be nice if there was a representative picture for this article.68.159.145.43 (talk) 10:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Came looking for a photo. Left disappointed. 72.220.174.167 (talk) 04:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Nightshirt

message: About "It tends to be tighter than the casual shirt - reducing the tendency to twist while rolling around in ones sleep." and "The nightshirt has seen an increased popularity in certain nightclubs and raves due to its tendency for being skin tight." -- both statements sound all wrong. Or at least they are not descriptive of the actual nightshirts I am familiar with. (As opposed, perhaps, to some fashion items that may be based loosely -- ha! -- on actual nightshirts.) For just one example, look that the models wearing products sold by Hextol (http://www.hextol.co.uk/). Look at most of the stuff that shows up in google (http://images.google.com/images?q=nightshirt). Those are actual nightshirts: shirts for wearing at night to bed, not for clubbing. And think of all the nightshirts you've seen in old films. They're long and loose, not "tighter than the casual shirt" at all. And were these long baggy things really "worn all day under outer clothing" rather than taken off in the morning? And does that agree with the next paragraph, in which it is claimed that "The major difference in the use of the nightshirt versus alternatives, such as pajamas, is that it replaces all clothing worn during the day." What? Eeksypeeksy 11:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I've corrected the text to better fit with what I know about nightshirts.  But as far I understand it, the nightshirt as a sleeping garment does derive from the practice (before daily bathing became commonplace) of sleeping in one's underwear... which in those days consisted of a long and baggy shirt. - JasonAQuest (talk) 01:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The sourcing of this article is bad. The only given source is very old and can therefore hardly be used as an indication what a nightshirt today looks like and why it is different from a nightgown. --PaterMcFly talk contribs 17:21, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Oshawa Centre

message: I couldn't find a straight answer as to whether the Zellers will be replaced by Target in this mall. The Zellers is most certainly closing if it hasn't already as all Zellers are closing. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Target?
Talk:Boubou (clothing)

message: Please change the name of this article to Grand boubou. In French a boubou is a man's or woman's robe. This article is about the big robe.  A boubou (clothing) is a woman's robe/dress  also called a kaftan or a man's robe, also called a Senegalese kaftan.  This article has an erroneous title.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Trueblue74 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: This article does not properly cite its sources.  It also appears to infer that similarity of clothing means that one originated from the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akinsope (talk • contribs) 07:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I moved the page from Boubou (clothing) to Agbada, per the Natural disambiguation guideline. The disambiguation on Boubou is not necessary since there are other popular name that can be given to the article. Moreover, Boubou doesn't seem to satisfy WP:COMMONNAME. Through google search, I was able to gather the following stats for Boubou clothing: 450,000 Web results, 1,000 News results, 2,000 book results.
I chose Agbada title because it seems to be the only alternative name that is used by more than one ethnic group, and spanning several West African countries. Furthermore, it seems to be a more popular term. Through google search, I was able to gather the following stats for Agbada: 560,000 web results, 2,000 News results, 16,000 book results. Just incase anyone has an issue with the name change, let's discuss.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 09:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for name change
Talk:Regeneration (theology)

message: Disputing the section being neutral. Since it isn't under the title "Evangelical," it sort of negates the entire purpose of the rest of the article, which is to discuss this theological and spiritual concept from differing viewpoints and denominational heritages, not from one biased perspective. The fact that regeneration is clearly associated with "putting faith in Christ" here ("Putting faith in Christ means that you trust him with your life, leaving your past ways of life behind, hence the term rebirth. What happens when you are reborn?") as opposed to baptismal regeneration shows how this section is anti-sacramental, and evangelical in nature.
It would not be widely accepted that regeneration is "how an individual is able to become one with Christ," which makes regeneration appear as the means to forgiveness of sins, and confuses regeneration with justification. Regeneration is the act of the Holy Spirit creating a newness of one's heart. Catholics, Anglicans, Presbyterians, and Lutherans would maintain that the key to union with Christ is baptism, which can include infants, and Arminian Evangelicals, Methodists, and Pentecostals would say conscious faith, but only certain evangelicals would stipulate that the key to union with Christ is regeneration. Many of the above mentioned Christians, especially those with sacramental leanings, would disagree with statements such as "The next thing that happens to a person who undergoes regeneration through Christ is that they become a part of the body of Christ." Again, most of the church would say baptism and/or faith is what confirms someone as part of the community of God, not regeneration. Communion is the sacrament and outward sign of that spiritual identity.
To offer a differing point of view, here is Bishop Tom Wright: "Since what is true of the Messiah is true of his people (see above), all those who are ‘in the Messiah’ by baptism and faith have his death and resurrection reckoned to them so that when God looks at them he sees Calvary and Easter – and so that when they look at themselves they must learn to see those events as well, and to live accordingly.  This being-in-Christ, indwelt by the Spirit, is the means by which the PRESENT declaration of ‘in the right’ truly anticipates the future one (Romans 8 etc)." 
Here we see union with Christ being defined in terms of baptism and faith.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.99.174.176 (talk) 00:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Regeneration summary

message: Calvin did NOT teach baptismal regeneration.
"It is now clear how false the doctrine is which some long ago taught, and others still persist in, that by baptism we are exempted and set free from original sin, and from the corruption which was propagated by Adam to all his posterity, and that we are restored to the same righteousness and purity of nature which Adam would have had if he had maintained the integrity in which he was created."
http://ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.vi.xvi.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.216.194 (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calvinism and Reformed Theology
Talk:Imagine (TV series)

message: There was an episode about Edward Hopper in June 2004 which doesn't seem to be mentioned on this entry. Unknown poster
There was also an episode in late 2006, repeated 2007, on Never Mind the Buzzcocks, entitled "Imagine ... a mildly amusing panel show". Xmas1973 23:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas Philip Wallrad de Hénin-Liétard d'Alsace

message: Why do we have a wrong surname?
father is on Philippe Louis de Hénin-Liétard d'Alsace, Count of Boussu and Prince of Chimay. I will correct this family name,.--Carolus (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Laurier Québec

message: This mall is now officially named "Laurier Québec". There should be a mention of it.
The article should be renamed and references in other articles should be updated.
I'll do it someday, if my IP address doesn't change :) . In the meantime, go ahead. 70.80.113.243 05:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name : Laurier Québec 

message: I couldn't find a source stating the number of anchors. The number of major tenants can be obtained here, but I'm not sure if they all qualify as anchors. Tomj (talk) 22:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on similar articles, it seem they qualify as anchors. Tomj (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anchors

message: There is inconsistancy in the number of stores. Ivanhoe Cambridge indicates Laurier Quebec has 350 in the profile sheet    while indicating 265 in the fact sheet . 
The # of stores in the drop-down lists in Ivanhoe Cambridge and Laurier Quebec websites are also different. Laurier Quebec's website has about 265 stores in the drop-down list , while Ivanhoe Cambridge's has about 300 (but not 350).
Therefore to eliminate all contradiction, I have "+- 300" for the number of stores until someone can come up with the real number.             
Farine (talk) 06:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of stores 
Talk:Kneeskin

message: All three x-skins are essentially the same piece of sportswear, the only difference being how much of the body the clothing article covers. All three articles are hardly sourced, and sources will be relevant for all three suit styles. Readers of the topic would also be looking at all three suit stlyes too. --124.168.141.139 (talk) 01:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose These are totally different suits. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Merge They leg, knee and body skin suits can all be one article. They also need pictures too. Moonraker0022 (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[legskin]] and [[bodyskin]]
Talk:Place Montreal Trust

message: Place Montreal Trust is the only shopping centre in Downtown Montreal with five major retailers under its roof, including Zara, Indigo Books and Music, Winners, DeSerres and Mexx.
This needs to be updated as Mexx is no more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gentleman wiki (talk • contribs) 20:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexx
Talk:Ski suit

message: Snowboarding pants and Snowboarding jacket ought to be merged into this article. They are essentially parts of a form of a ski suit. Harold Snow (talk) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Snowsuit Wearer (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: Could we add something about Inuit atajuqs, please? HLHJ (talk) 01:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atajuqs 

message: This section needs some citations or rework.  On its face, the numbers given do not appear to make sense.  As turbulent drag is proportional to v^2, halving the drag force for a set v will allow a velocity increase of about 41%, not double.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.101.12 (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race Suit 

message: Instead of Putin, use a picture of a ski champion instead. Propaganda doesn't belong in Wikipedia. 2601:243:823:10B1:305B:4897:631F:E75E (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: i can probably do something this weekend :) Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 19:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Find another picture that isn't a war criminal
Talk:Port Place Shopping Centre

message: Don’t forget the Magic Kingdom Of Christmas. It was a theme park in the mall.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.199.9.27 (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Park 
Talk:Portage Place

message: Safety issues and various shootings/muggings/murders happening at this downtown mall need to be discussed!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.206.6 (talk) 04:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Violence

message: As of 2010, Portage Place generated $250 per square foot in monthly sales and charged retailers $15–$40 per square foot in rent, and monthly rent for the  food court was $135 per square foot.
Jimj wpg (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per Square Foot Sales - Needs updating to recent figure
Talk:Brian Hunter (trader)

message: Brian Hunter was not "indicted." He or his fund, I have to check which, was named in a civil action by FERC. Removing the entire paragraph while I check.--Samiharris 02:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "indicted"

message: Brian Hunter did not do anything noteworthy before the Amaranth collapse, and has not done anything noteworthy since then. There are plenty of traders with the same type of skill (& luck) to make 7 or 8 figure gains in a few years. IMO, this article should be appended as a subsection of the Amaranth article. - Frankie1969 (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BLP1E]]? 