lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bad Blood

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The article located at "Bad blood" (with the second word lowercase) simply redirects here, to "Bad Blood" (with it capitalized). If there is no real article at the former, it might just as simply be the disambiguation page itself.
MoS:DAB links to WP:DAB for naming conventions, and the latter states, "Usually, there should be just one disambiguation page for all cases (upper- or lower-case) and variant punctuation." WP:Naming reads, "Do not capitalize second and subsequent words unless the title is a proper noun (such as a name) or is otherwise almost always capitalized," which I interpret to mean "in almost all uses of a specific term, not almost all variant terms. Couple the two, and I believe the page should follow the standard guideline, not capitalizing the second word, regardless of the fact that many (or even most) of the entries are capitalized.
This is not to mention that moving the page will make it easier to link to it - the current setup is just begging to be double-redirected. —PaladinWhite 05:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 07:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page to "Bad blood" 

message: I've gone through and edited the page as best I could to conform with WP:MoS (DAB) - there are a couple problems that I'm not sure how to resolve.
*I couldn't figure out how to format some links, e.g. titles which required piping for quotes, but also included a qualifier. For instance:
** Bad Blood (Dresden) - not piping the link at all leaves the title unquoted, obviously incorrect.
** "Bad Blood (Dresden)" - placing quotation marks outside the link puts them around the qualifier, also incorrect.
** "Bad Blood" (Dresden) - piping includes the quotation marks as a part of the link, which I believe is inappropriate, but is the best solution I could find.
*Two entries still have a redlink as their only link, because neither the book nor the author has an article - the MoS reads that redlinks should not be the only link on a line, but I felt that the inclusion of these entries was better left for someone else to decide.
** Bad Blood (Linda Corby) an autobiography by Linda Corby published in 2005
** Bad Blood (Alan M Brooker), the 1998 novel
PaladinWhite 02:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  22 April, 2007 edit
Template talk:Bridges of Portland, Oregon

message: I thought I would take a minute to explain why I am introducing changes to this template. One reason for changing the template is to improve accessibility for visually impaired users using a screen reader. Whenever a screen reader encounters a dot, it calls out the word "dot". The material presents as a lot of tiny disjointed paragraphs rather than a list. With the new mark-up, the screen reader will announce that a list is coming, and then will proceed to read out the items on the list. Application of the hlist class is about presenting the material as actual lists, which helps not just people with vision issues, but those viewing the site using phones and other non-traditional devices. Search engines also will read lists better.The use of the dots is now deprecated, and have been since August. Each dot requires the application of a template, and templates are expensive, as they increase server load. There are limits as to how many templates can be placed on a page. Application of the latest method, using listclasses and bodyclasses to create the lists, results in a reduction in post-expand include size of 9% and a reduction in template argument size of 19% on this template. This is a substantial improvement that will lead to quicker load times for pages and a better experience for our viewing audience.The transition has not been trouble free; some kinks have had to be ironed out, and there may still be a ways to go. However, we have the templates displaying adequately in the two latest versions of the problematic Internet Explorer (IE8 and IE9),  and we can't hold back development of Wikipedia for older, buggy browsers. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, -- Dianna (talk) 04:26, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion to hlist
Talk:TCP/IP stack fingerprinting

message: The article says that banner grabbing is only possible for the protocols FTP, TELNET and HTTP. I'm sure that the list is incomplete, because it is although possible to find out the banner from an SSH server via netcat, which doesn't use any of the three protocols above. --Gronau 20:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The page is called 'TCP/IP stack fingerprinting', but starts with an explanation of OS fingerprinting; in fact, the phrase of the title does not appear in the article at all. This is obviously wrong. How to fix? No clue here. Eaglizard 06:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Title 

message: The article suggests to block all outgoing ICMP echo replies, but I've read somewhere that a RFC requires every computer to respond with echo reply to an echo request. is it true? --grawity (talk) 21:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  blocking ICMP echo reply 

message: How does the diagram illustrate in any way anything about fingerprinting and how is an active fingerprinter different than this diagram for passive fingerprinting? I would suggest removal of this image. Kbrose (talk) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: diagram
Talk:Samuel Hubbard Scudder

message: I removed some language referring to Samuel Hubbard Scudder as allegedly contributing research to the "Doheny Report" (available here), apparently published in 1924, some years after Samuel Hubbard Scudder's death. The lead author was Samuel Hubbard of the Oakland Museum. There is no mention of Samuel Hubbard Scudder in that PDF document that I can find. So this statement appears to be incorrect, and based on a confusion of names. --Cotinis 00:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Doheny Report
Talk:Minié rifle

message: If this weapon was developed in 1849, how was it issued to Zouaves in North Africa in 1846?
I removed the 1846 statement - could not find any other source to back it up.  Dcheng (talk) 23:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article claims buck and ball was the common load for military smoothbore muskets. I've never seen reference to buck and ball as a military musket load. It's possible it may have been used in the US, but it certainly wasn't the standard elsewhere, where ball was the standard. I've left the claim for now, but it needs supporting or withdrawing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.66.40 (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Buck and Ball claim
Talk:Prayer Tower/Archive 1

message: ===sensitive body part===
Kralizec, If you are teached enough (read brainwashed) you will se holly spirit above the tower. 
But i am offended by the tower - which stands for sexual act, very similar to San Pietro in Vatican. The monument in Vatican is from Egypt and stands for P**** (sensitive body part) of Baal. 
As a follower of Jesus I found this not acceptable. You should not call my page editing a vandalism, supressing my voice. That is called information control, or MindControl. 
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
Am i crazy? Just try googling for  penis/phalus/phalic and monument/tower/architecture. Please really try. And tell me if i am wrong. This  tower may be seen as sexual act. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.124.127 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 10 June 2005  (UTC)
:Phallic symbol conspiracy theories are not relevant to this article.  I am sorry if you are offended by all architectural objects that are tall and pointy, but wikipedia is a repository of facts, not opinions.  --Kralizec! 16:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? --Kralizec! 05:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: I say again, huh?  --Kralizec! (talk) 21:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Offended

message: Kralizec, If you are teached enough (read brainwashed) you will se holly spirit above the tower. 
But i am offended by the tower - which stands for sexual act, very similar to San Pietro in Vatican. The monument in Vatican is from Egypt and stands for P**** (sensitive body part) of Baal. 
As a follower of Jesus I found this not acceptable. You should not call my page editing a vandalism, supressing my voice. That is called information control, or MindControl. 
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
Am i crazy? Just try googling for  penis/phalus/phalic and monument/tower/architecture. Please really try. And tell me if i am wrong. This  tower may be seen as sexual act. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.124.127 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 10 June 2005  (UTC)
:Phallic symbol conspiracy theories are not relevant to this article.  I am sorry if you are offended by all architectural objects that are tall and pointy, but wikipedia is a repository of facts, not opinions.  --Kralizec! 16:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: sensitive body part

message: Your unholy "holy spirit burning on top" 
conspiracy theory is a fact? Are you kidding me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.124.127 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 18 June 2005  (UTC)
:Huh? --Kralizec! 05:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I say again, huh?  --Kralizec! (talk) 21:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unholy spirit
Talk:Motorcycle Safety Foundation

message: Who wrote this page?  Where in the BRC Curriculum does it say we're to encourage riders to ride "as if they're invisible?"  Why are we talking about things that aren't part of the curriculum?   
Brett.sholtis 06:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2007

message: I added a controversy section and added the new lead paragraph and removed this paragraph:
"It is also worth noting that the MSF has attempted to bury and ignore overwhelming research evidence that indicates a novice rider is at a greater risk of crashing when they take the current curriculum offered by the MSF.  It has also been alleged that in the Pennsylvania program in 2007 the MSF had worked to cover up the deaths and paralysis of two students in their program."
for making extreme and dubious claims with no evidence or citation at all.
I know nothing about this subject whatsoever, just came across the article and had to do something.  Anyone actually knowledgeable about the subject in question please feel free to do whatever else is needed, thanks! Blurble (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section, POV 

message: Discussion continued from user page ... there is an empty section for course content at Motorcycle Safety Foundation#Course descriptions.  Of course feel free to change to a better section title if this isn't the best. -- Brianhe (talk) 17:40, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Details about the curriculum that have been published in third party sources are on the firmest ground. We don't need to go into excessive detail, and anything covered by major media is likely to be considered encyclopedic. That doesn't mean we can't also have details only found in MSF publications, but we should use caution and not list every part of every course. A general outline, with emphasis on what makes the MSF different from a generic motorcycle course, should be the goal. If we can find Featured Article-quality articles about colleges and universities, or similar institutions, that can be our guide as well. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curriculum 
Talk:École secondaire l'Horizon

message: bit more required for a "start" rating. More topics, refs and pics. Victuallers 22:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I have rated this as Stub Class, as in its current state, it's really little more than a collection of random facts under headings. I have rated it of low importance, as most people are unlikely to be familiar with the topic of the article. Cheers, CP 23:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:CANADA Assessment
Talk:Centre de services scolaire des Navigateurs

message: Much too small for a stub. I was expecting a link to the French page ... Victuallers 16:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess

message: The next school board elections will take place on Sunday, November 2, 2014. The position of chairman will be chosen by universal suffrage. This will be for a three year term. The last school board elections took place in 2007.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.160.216.79 (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elections 
Talk:Henry Barnett (banker)

message: Please do not delete this article for the time being.  The author has indicated here that the proper copyright permission confirmation steps have been taken.  Thank you. --Butseriouslyfolks 20:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Copyvio 

message: A simple way to avoid copyvio is to rewrite the information in a different form. The content is not copyright, only the exact form in which it is conveyed. It needed rewriting anyway to meet wiki requirements. I have done this. It does not now infringe copyright. Tyrenius 21:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite to avoid copyvio
Talk:Winged Creatures (film)

message: "[...]her infant son (Ron Abler), who is a psychologist, attempts to help the survivors but is met with suspicion and little response from any of them as he is a baby." wtf? --75.118.158.21 (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Gelai Volcano

message: The statement that 'wildlife numbers have dropped' as a RESULT of hunting needs to be backed up by references. Unregulated, illegal hunting (poaching) is most likely the reason for the drop in numbers, not the PERMITTED hunting which is at a very low level. Simbamangu (talk) 11:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wildlife comment should be verified
Talk:Lodoïska (Cherubini)

message: 'Rescue opera' is not a real genre (it's an early 20th-century invention) and no-one founded it so I think this is inaccurate. (Nor is it particularly early either.) Stephen Willis in his article on Lodoïska in Grove doesn't mention 'rescue opera' at all.  --Kleinzach 10:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good for him. Other sources name it as a founding work of rescue opera (see, they're cited), and other sources also name rescue opera as a genre. I wouldn't be averse to removing "the genre of" from that sentence, just to avoid carrying over the argument, but it is acknowledged as a founding work of rescue opera. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you please also undo the changes you have made to Rescue opera and List of opera genres? The latter is a list of historical terms and should not contain unhistorical ones. --Kleinzach 01:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The same problem appears to exist with "Savoy Opera," which was in the list when you created it. Take your issue to RfC if you're unwilling to let it lie. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My interest is in accurate, properly referenced articles, not in drama. There is a procedure for discussing article content issues. It's explained here: WP:BRD. It doesn't encompass multiple reversions and edit warring. --Kleinzach 02:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad to hear that your interest is in accurate, properly referenced articles. Then you should be content with the references I've provided stating that it is a founding work of rescue opera. Please read the essay you so kindly linked me, so that you can gain a perfect understanding of why it is not the appropriate process here. If you don't want this adequately sourced information in the article, make an effort yourself, do an RfC or 3O. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:56, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead: ''"Founding work of rescue opera"''
Talk:Caminetti v. United States

message: Here's a possible source for article expansion, naming Caminetti's partner in crime, Maury L. Diggs, who later became a prominent architect. 'Maury Diggs, Fox Theater builder, ex-convict", Inside Bay Area.
Binksternet (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caminetti and Diggs
Talk:2007 European Grand Prix

message: Someone had changed the name of this to European Grand Prix. Why? Cite a source, please. John Anderson 06:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See discussion (and sources) on WP:F1 talk page DH85868993 08:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, let's discuss this there. John Anderson 15:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the name change?

message: Folks, I hope you're taking notes, because I am already predicting an awesome featured article out of this race. ;) --Golbez 12:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I love it when it rains. --Howard the Duck 16:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Raaaain

message: The article says that there were 75 pit stops in the race. On http://www.fia.com/sport/Championships/F1/F1_Lap_Charts/Europe/2007.html I can count only 73 (unless I lost count!). Kimi entered the pits when he retired, but this is not shown on there, so that could count for one of the missing ones. chem_tom 16:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 75 indeed.
1 - Button, Rosberg, Speed & Sutil 
2 - Liuzzi, Raikkonen & Winkelhock 
3 - Sato & Schumacher 
4 - Alonso, Coulthard, Fisichella, Hamilton, Kovalainen, Kubica, Massa, Webber & Wurz 
5 - Barrichello 
6 - Davidson, Heidfeld & Trulli 
4+6+6+36+5+18 = 75
=) Cs-wolves 08:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pit Stops 
Talk:POV (TV series)

message: I can find no information on the web to verify any of the claims made in the history section, and so I have tagged it accordingly. Unless someone can provide any references or sources I will be removing this section. Sarilox (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *After five months and still no references I have removed the unverifiable history section. Sarilox (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Template talk:Fred Frith

message: Doesn't Naked City deserve a higher rung in the "bands" section?  - Steve3849 talk 06:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer my own question I see the first tier are all early bands, the second tier are bands he led and thus leaving the third tier. Naked City is most often thought of a John Zorn and then guitar (Frith's forte) is Bill Frisell. Still, his contribution there is noteworthy... maybe the third rung could be a larger font size?  - Steve3849 talk 06:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tiers one and two are for bands Frith led or was a founding member of, tier one being those bands he is best known for. The third tier is for other bands he was simply a member of, like John Zorn's Naked City, and hence the smaller font. --Bruce1ee 10:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naked City 

message: I've removed "Collaborating artists" from the template. Frith has collaborated with many artists and even if we include only the prominent ones, it would still be a long list. I don't know of any other musician templates that use "Collaborating artists" and, particularly because of the number of possible entries here, I feel it's better to leave it off. —Bruce1eetalk 12:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborating artists
Talk:Outside the Lines

message: In addition to Schaap, ESPN Personalities include Tom Rinaldi, Josh Elliott, David Amber, George Smith, Steve Bunin, Bonnie Bernstein, Matt Winer & Rachel Nichols all have guest hosted on this program recently.--12.127.178.158 (talk) 22:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest Hosts
Talk:Lilias, Yoga and You

message: How is commentary on the host's attractiveness, or whether or not she'd be receptive to flirting, relevant to this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C600:2E43:503:D7F2:780:209F (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary 
Talk:Reliable Sources

message: The end of the first paragraph needs to be rewritten, as the text references Howard Kurtz by last name only without prior mention. Apace361 (talk) 16:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is http://www.sputnikmusic.com/ a reliable site?  The paid staff must approve any reviews published, so wouldn't those reviews count as reliable sources?  The Wikipedia article for them at Sputnikmusic#Reviewer_stratification says Contributing Reviewers "are acknowledged as being good writers who generate content of a high quality."  They don't just let anyone submit something.  Whether you are paid as a writer, or volunteer, that shouldn't matter.  A paid editorial staff still approves everything and these are professionally written reviews.  Dream Focus 23:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is aout the CNN program "Reliable Sources." I think you may have been thinking about Wikipedia's reliable sources noticeboard:  try putting your question there: WP:RSN. Drrll (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops!  How'd I mess that up?  Sorry, ignore that then.  Dream Focus 01:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  sputnikmusic
Talk:Snickelways of York

message: First: The article is simply not comprehensive enough. Can we find some history on these things? Why did they evolve like that? What role have they played in the city's growth and development. The term may be new but what it refers to isn't.
Second: Lack of key citations, despite brevity of article. "... and has even been used in official council documents". Something like this, especially when the article admits the term is a neologism, absolutely must be cited. Ditto with "...a technique which Jones explicitly acknowledged as inspired by the Pictorial Guides of Alfred Wainwright." If he said it somewhere, we need a note.
Third: Footnotes insufficient and not in the proper format.
It seems like there's a lot more to be done (I'd consider this article start-class at best at the moment), but certainly once these are addressed it can be renominated. Daniel Case 07:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for GA failure