Template talk:Infobox Playboy Playmate

message: Lately the  template has been added to most, if not all, Playmate infoboxes.  Today, an editor went through taking this template out.  I've reverted the removals.  This template has been agreed on for use at  (see discussion) which covers many more articles than the Playmate infobox.  Since there seems to be at least one user who doesn't feel it belongs here, I'd like to hear other people's input.  Thoughts? Dismas|(talk) 23:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly see no problem with the day and age. Though one can easily determine the age by the birthdate, the age doesn't hurt the article in any way. Ohyeahmormons 19:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date and age template 

message: I know that this sounds rather harsh but in plain terms this infobox is ugly.  There are serious issues with the spacing of it (for example, there are a number of fields which use three lines whilst the adjacent text only takes up one, making the spacing look poor) and it detracts rather than adds to the article (am talking about Tiffany Fallon in particular.  I don't know how to do it myself, but the first thing that should be done to make this look better is to incorporate the name into the infobox (perhaps with a colour background) to make it look more together. Some colour would probably enhance it quite a bit. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 05:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This infobox is ugly 

message: I notice some template users use something like: 36" - 24" - 36" for body measurements, but WP:UNITS suggests that " not be used for inches. But I don't think we should use 36 in - 24 in - 36 in either. A more usual usage is 36-24-36 and usually understood in the context of body measurements.  I was looking for guidance but could not find a reference anywhere.  Schmiteye 04:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurement units 

message: Is there any particular reason why the birth date and age template doesn't work if try to use it within this template?? Tabercil 19:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Within the template?  Do you mean actually coded into it or used in the birth date's value field?  It works everywhere I've seen it, for instance, Tiffany Selby.  Dismas|(talk) 21:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... you're right. I guess I musta made a typo when I tried keying it in and thought it was the Playmate infobox that was broken instead of me <G>. Oh well. Tabercil 21:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date and age template 

message: Why isn't there a caption field in this info box?  Anyone?  Dismas|(talk) 20:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody has replied, I'm gonna throw one in.  Dismas|(talk) 21:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

text: It was added, but I think it should have a default. Wikipedia's built-in images look too big in infoboxes in their original sizes. -Lwc4life 17:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New fields 

message: Propose to change the default header color to DeepSkyBlue for living Playmates and silver for deceased Playmates. This would be an automatic based on the death filed. Very similar to the Template:Infobox actor. 
The code to change would be the following:
{| class="infobox vcard" style="width:22em; font-size:90%; text-align:left;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:center; font-size:larger; background-color:; color:#000;" class="fn" | 
This would make the infobox a little more in line with other infoboxes.
Also I believe that all fields should be optional and only display if a filed has been filled in.  --Jeanenawhitney (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Header color

message: I have cleaned up the template code. Added color to make it a more pleasing display. Centered the appearance and date lines. Made the default image size to 150px which seems to be better suited for infoboxes. I did change the image-name field to image which at my attempt broke the template. But AnonEMouse fixed it before I could (thanks). I have changed the month field to issue (but preserved month for backward compatibility) just for the fact that it is the issue of the magazine not the month. Fixed measurements display for bust hips waist. added color background for playmate of the year. removed the confusing pmoy abbreviation. Made all fields optional. The last reason was because I came upon a lot of boxes with question marks in them, which just made it darn right nasty looking. Last I added full documentation for the use of the template. --Jeanenawhitney (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New layout with documentation

message: I added a parameter for website and birthname. The parameter for birthname was in the doc's but not in the template. Softened the color displays. Placed division lines between sections. Changed the natural bust parameter to accept y, yes, n, or no. But display as Yes or No. Moved  playmate of the year under playmate of the month issue. This allowed adding the website to the bottom of the box. Changed the born and died display to a better format. Fixed a bug that could cause measurements not to display properly. If a particular measurement is not used the other two (or single) will display properly. Changed the order of display for born parameters from place of birth, birth date to birth date, place of birth. Added a deathplace parameter. All parameters are optional. --pete 19:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding website parameter

message: I've made a change, and wasn't sure where to discuss. To avoid duplicating here, it's  Thanks, Piano non troppo (talk) 21:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Preceding and succeeding change

message: The natural bust field was added, without discussion, here.  This field is not part of the more generic Template:Infobox adult biography.  I don't see why it's necessary in this Playmate template.  So, I'm proposing that it be removed.  Comments?  Dismas|(talk) 05:42, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll agree. Although has there been a lot of undocumented assertions by editors speculating due to the presence of the field in the playmate articles? It was rampant in the general porn star articles. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've removed it pretty much on the grounds Morbid mentions. If it's relevant to the article on the person, then it should be sufficiently well sourced to go into the article. Tabercil (talk) 21:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural bust 

message: Is it possible to align the infobox to left of an article? If not, can that parameter be added? Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aligning 

message: This message is to notify you that there is an RfC ongoing on whether to add pronunciation info to , which this infobox transcludes. Your comments on the matter are appreciated. Thanks! 0x0077BE (talk · contrib) 17:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on [[Template:Infobox person]]

message: I've just noticed that women's bust and waist measurements are in BLPs because of this template. Those parameters were removed from  in March 2016 following this discussion. Can they please be removed from this one too? SarahSV (talk) 02:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bust and waist 

message: I am now setting up a tracking category (:Category:Pages using infobox Playboy Playmate with deprecated parameters) to facilitate deprecation of these parameters. After it fills, I will run through it with AWB and then remove support for the parameters. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 00:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand why you're not removing the fields from the template (which will instantly stop the values from showing up in articles) already... I'd also boldly remove  as done in  five years ago, given the unanimous support for removal of the other three above. Nardog (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Done; with thanks to MB who finished the job for me. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , why did you remove the tracking? It's common to have a maintenance category for unknown parameters - these could get added back in at any time on some article by and editor not aware they are permanently deprecated. Probably better for this be be generalized to catch any unknown parameter. There is a "Check for unknown parameters" that can be used. See the source for Infobox automobile for an example. MB 20:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Deprecated and unknown are not quite the same. Creating a tracking category for unknown parameters and using Module:Check for unknown parameters might indeed be a good idea, though we might as well merge it with  as suggested by Jc37 below. Nardog (talk) 21:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Yes, I support this. Although it was not explicitly discussed in the RfC, I can't see how the rationale presented in the RfC could not apply to weight as well. Nardog (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll do that too. I'll also disable the parameters now as suggested. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprecating 

message: I think height "may" have value, and is generally not quite so variable in adults, so I'm not proposing removing that, but weight is rather variable like the measurements noted in the RfC above, and should probably be deprecated with the rest. I was going to Boldly remove the weight parameter, but thought I'd drop a note here first.  If Tol would like to add it to what he is doing above, I would be totally fine with that. - jc37 01:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I support this. Although it was not explicitly discussed in the RfC, I can't see how the rationale presented in the RfC could not apply to weight as well. Nardog (talk) 01:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll do that too. I'll also disable the parameters now as suggested. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove weight 

message: I realise that this infobox is on over 300 articles, but I wonder if maybe the better overall solution might be to merge/replace instances of this with :Template:Infobox model. It looks like it has all the fields except issue/preceeded/succeeded and pmoy information. 
For implementation, just remove all fields that infobox model already has from this template. And this template becomes an infobox add-in. (Which seems to be how it is already being used in some cases).
Just a thought. - jc37 04:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to model