lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jaynestown

message: I don't know if this belongs in the article or not, but for the curious, here are instructions on how to get to the easter egg on the DVD: http://www.eeggs.com/items/42488.html Ponder 13:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hero of Canton" DVD Easter Egg 

message: I'm still unfamiliar with much of WP, but I'm asking: are we not supposed to put in the lyrics to "The Ballad of Jayne Cobb" because of sort of copyright infringement or violation? Otherwise, I believe it would be great to include in the article. Mooyah 05:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the copyright violation is exactly why. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics to Song 

message: Daniel Bess plays the mudder who jumps in front of Jayne at the end.  He played Rick Allen in season 1 of 24.  He wasn't an antagonist in Firefly, but it still might be worth noting in the Trivia section, where it lists other actors who have appeared on 24 and Firefly.
: Actually, this is just engaging in a kind of Wikipedia version of Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. Nothing about this coincidental connection to 24 illuminates the article subject, even if it were a sourced analysis, which it isn't (and almost certainly couldn't be). I have therefore removed the whole trivia item. (And to head off the expected complaints that this is done elsewhere, I would point out that it should be deleted elsewhere as well. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collector of information, and trivia items should have some likelihood of providing sourced, meaningful information about the subject.) ~ Jeff Q (talk) 07:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actors in 24 and Firefly
Talk:Druridge Bay curlew

message: These reasons appeared with the failed review but weren't visible for some reason. Here they are:
* The article does not cite its sources.
* The lead section should be expanded to summarise more of the article's content.
* Section headings should be capitalised according to the WP:MOS.
* The article may be too technical for a general audience to understand. Rufous-crowned Sparrow 19:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To-Do List

message: I've nominated this for GA status. Personally, I think it isn't quite there yet, although it arguably meets all criteria. The lack of images is because, as far as I am aware there are no non-copyrighted photos of the bird. I was a little worried about the section stubs, but Great Barrier Reef has passed as a GA with section stubs, so ... Over to you, independent reviewer. SP-KP 20:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination 

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed    
:it is incorrectly formatted - use == on headings to generate a TOC.  Also, two sections are marked as stubs.  Any tags which identify deficiencies bar articles from being designated good - I'll delist the barrier reef now.  Images would be really nice but if not available then there's nothing we can do.  Worldtraveller 14:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed 
Talk:List of fictional military aircraft

message: There is a mistake referreing the MC-130 as Talon, in fact is the Combat Talon as  MC-130E Combat Talon I and MC-130H Combat Talon II.  if what written in this article was true, they would be Combat Talon II and Combat Talon III after the T-38, and they are not --Jor70 (talk) 13:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Talon

message: Macross Mecha and Simoun things should be removed. The mecha are mecha, so should not be listed here. Simoun aren't "aircraft" either, they're mystical spirit things. 65.95.15.144 (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime - Macross and Simoun 

message: May I suggest adding the Mk.2/Type 2 titan, the UD-12 Shepherd, the UD-6 Talon, the Type 4 Doragon, and the BTR-20 Yastreb? They are all aerial vehicles from the 2006 DICE video game, Battlefield 2142. 71.74.7.246 (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's one thing this article needs, it's more aircraft.Planetjanet (talk) 08:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  extra aircraft 
Talk:Carson

message: Someone, probably named or surnamed Carson, insists on introducing the statement that the Carson is the SI unit for momentum, kg m/s.  I've already reverted this five times.  Please be aware that this is joke.  The SI unit for momentum has no special name.  Since the units of force (Newton), energy (Joule), and power (Watt) are named after famous scientists, many high school students, including a younger me and, presumably, whoever this Carson person is, have fantasized about getting the unit of momentum named after them. -- Eb.hoop 20:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unit of momentum nonsense

message: Lists of people by first name probably are not encyclopedic, and in any case disrupt the page Carson which avoids needing to be sorted by surname by the fact that they are all surnamed Carter. Moved here:
*Carson Daly (1973–), American television personality
*Carson Kressley (1969–), American fashion expert on television
*Carson McCullers (1917–1967), American writer
*Carson Palmer (1979–), American Football Quarterback
*Carson Whitsett (1945–), American keyboardist, songwriter, and producer
--Jerzy•t 18:46, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Given-name Carson
Talk:Plain Language Movement

message: Article merged: See new talk-page here  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluous (talk • contribs) 04:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

message: Err…why not refer to George Orwell as the "George Orwell of plain language". And why not mention ‘The fascist octopus has sung its swan-song; the jack-boot must be thrown into the melting-pot.’ —Ian Spackman 20:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does any US politician support it? -- 200.100.252.143 (talk) 02:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orwell
Talk:Maria of Antioch

message: Did Maria really become a nun? Andrew Dalby 20:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, she "retired to a monastery", as usual, but that doesn't necessarily mean she went anywhere or did anything differently! Adam Bishop 04:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nun or none?

message: The article states that at her wedding in 1161, one of the three patriarchs was "Athanasios, Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch". But the List of Greek Orthodox Patriarchs of Antioch names Euthymius as the incumbent in 1161 (the Latin Patriarch of Alexandria was Ralph II). According to the list, Athanasius I did not become patriarch until 1166. I wonder which one is correct, Athanasios or Euthymius? MishaPan 16:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the names are correct, and the dates in our articles are off. The names are given by John Cinnamus, the Emperor's secretary. Adam Bishop 16:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Patriarch

message: An infobox is needed as it would greatly enhance this well-written article.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Scarborough, Western Cape

message: ===Conservation village===
I have searched high and low for nice descriptions of this term but haven't really found any. On Wikipedia I found articles on Conservation Areas but not something like this so far. Any ideas? Lsjzl 20:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome to the talk page

message: I have searched high and low for nice descriptions of this term but haven't really found any. On Wikipedia I found articles on Conservation Areas but not something like this so far. Any ideas? Lsjzl 20:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation village
Talk:Mud

message: Really?  No mining engineers, hydrologists, or prospectors have anything at all to say about mud?  Not even so much as a passing peep acknowledging, say, the various uses of bentonite clay at drill rigs, the mechanics of in-situ leach technology (as in Uranium mining), or the ecology of alluvial plains?
You know something we don't?  Please: do chime in!  Don't worry: you won't break anything, lose your tools in the hole, or migrate any hard-to-isolate contaminants to Wikipedia faster than tritium migrates through sandy substrate to groundwater.  ;^) ;^)
Cheers, ༺།།ༀ་ཨཱཿ་ཧཱུྃ།།འཚེར།།xeltifon།།སར་ཝ་མང་ག་ལམ།།༻  {say it}  {contribs} 07:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about use in industry and/or environmental science? 

message: No Southwest homesteaders, architects, historians, artists, interior designers, wall-to-wall carpeting-installers, janitors, or housewives have anything whatsoever to say about mud?
Go ahead -- track it in!  :^) :^)
Cheers, ༺།།ༀ་ཨཱཿ་ཧཱུྃ།།འཚེར།།xeltifon།།སར་ཝ་མང་ག་ལམ།།༻  {say it}  {contribs} 07:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about building with ''adobe''? 

message: Who here loves mud? I do and I love wallowing in it!  Cl03tr00p3r (talk) 12:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mud  

message: This unsourced section seems very dubious, though it has been in the article since 2004, more or less: this edit was the first mention of stucco, at a time when the article was more or less a disambiguation page. 
I cannot see that stucco would be referred to as mud except perhaps in construction site slang, (presumably US, as it's not mentioned in the Oxford English Dictionary).
I will remove the unlikely-looking statement here. PamD 21:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adhesive 

message: :This 2003 article has far too much-unsourced material. There is also non-relevant material. The lead sets up the perimeters with "Mud is soil, loam, silt or clay mixed with water." The section "As food" can certainly be relevant but the subsection, "Foods named "mud", is not. The last sentence states, " Never does this confectionery mud actually contain real mud." I will look for some sourcing when I can but may edit out all the unsourced and possibly  (original research material.  -- Otr500 (talk) 17:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:Sacral architecture

message: I think consideration need to be given to a merge of this page with Ecclesiastical architecture. Ecclesiastical is the correct term given architecture pertaining to religion. Giano | talk 21:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it may be more appropriate to merge the ecclesiastical architecture stub with the much better developed article on church architecture. Glenn4pr 03:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I notice the headings are sometimes relating to the religion (Hindu, Islam), other times it is by time period(Medieval, Modern and post-modern), still other times it is by style (Gothic, Baroque).  Is there a better way to organize this structure? Bytebear 18:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion, Time-period or style? 

message: It god-smacks and disbehoves me the suite of uniformed rationales that my peers provided for keeping the rubric "Religious architecture" instead of the inclusive auspice nominated... when the change of category was completed none of the aforementioned peers have re-qualified the opening paragraph which is still as per my edits.  They clearly took a deep interest in improving the article: *coff coff* . Uniformed democracy is anathema! Altars, standing stones, sacred groves, mandala, medicine wheel and temenos are sacred architecture but they may not be religious architecture... 
*shakes head*
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 03:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacred architecture v's Religious architecture 

message: After reading Frank Albo's 2007 essay Masonic Parlante in a Canadian Temple of Democracy: The Manitoba Legislative Building as Initiatory Theatre, I'm surprised there isn't a section in this article on the link between Freemasonry and sacred architecture. --Loremaster (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freemasonry and Sacred Archictecture 
Talk:2,3-Bisphosphoglyceric acid

message: I concur, although I would actually recommend that 2,3-Disphosphoglycerate be merged into this article as 2,3-Bisphosphoglycerate is of more biological importance due to its role in acclimatization and glycolysis. Even though the difference between the two is minor. I believe it is also an intermediate product in the calvin cycle of photosynthesis. I will check back here in a weeks time, if there are no responses or consensus with my opinion then I shall make the relevant changes.--WikipedianProlific(Talk) 12:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " Like that, histidine nº143 gets lost, so 2,3-BPG has difficulties in linking to the fetal hemoglobin, and it looks like the pure hemoglobin. That’s the way O2 flows from the mother to the fetus."
I can't quite put my finger on it, but this doesn't feel like a scientific style. Histidine "gets lost"?
Specifically, I don't know what the writer means by "it looks like the pure hemoglobin". What is "it"? What is "pure hemoglobin"? Deoxy? Oxygenated? Beta? Gamma? 
I'd be grateful if someone could take a look at this. Not me - I came here to find out about exactly this phenomenon, but I'm afraid I'm none the wiser.
Bdellovibrio (talk) 21:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fetal Hemoglobin 

message: Can this article be added to WP:MCB using the  tag? Somerandomuser (talk) 21:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add article to [[WP:MCB]]? 

message: The figure that appears in the Fetal Hemoglobin section seems a bit out of place and seems to be too large. I tried to make it smaller but I don't want to inadvertently mess up the layout. Somerandomuser (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fetal Hemoglobin figure 

message: The article mainly discusses about 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate. Should this article be renamed to "2,3-Bisphosphoglycerate" instead? Somerandomuser (talk) 22:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to 2,3-Bisphosphoglycerate
Talk:The Fruit Machine (1988 film)

message: This is a review, not an encyclopedia article.  It needs to be rewritten in NPOV.  User:Zoe|(talk) 21:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Is that Bruce Payne photo really necessary?
trezjr 10:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruce Payne Photo

message: Sue9 23:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brighton Dolphins
Talk:Pudding Mill Lane DLR station

message: This station is situated right in the heart of the Olympic Village site.
Will it be permanently closed before or during the Olympics? Ian Goodyear — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian goodyear (talk • contribs) 21:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: The time of the last train at the old station is given here as 00:47 but that is uncited. It is given elsewhere (in an unreliable source) as 00:46, but with a link to http://origin.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/media/newscentre/29956.aspx which may have verified it - however the origin.tfl.gov.uk server no longer exists and I can't find the relevant document on the present website and archive.org has nothing post 2007. Thryduulf (talk) 09:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last train at old station 

message: Is this the closest station for watching a West Ham Utd at home ? Any buses that drive closer ? Boeing720 (talk) 00:50, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Pudding Mill Lane DLR station, not for general conversation about the article's subject. Per WP:TALK#topic, please make your enquiry at the Reference Desk. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this isn't mentioned in the text, are questions like this one actually permitted. I could just as well have written "Article doesn't mention whether this station is the optimal one for visiting the London Olympic stadium 2012, I suggest this is added if true". This matter has been dealt with many times before. Always with the same result. Or has any new specific WP:guidline been added lately, which you may refer to ? Boeing720 (talk) 01:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You claim "this matter has been dealt with many times before. Always with the same result" - where? I see no previous discussion in the history of this page. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

text: No not at this page, but on several other pages. Not all types of questions, but such questions which deal with the lack of relevant information in the article. As I tried to exemplify above. If I had written "How much for a West Ham ticket at Trevor Brooking stand ?" - it would clearly be outside the article's scope. I can though, in retrospect, see that I should have used a better formulation for my question. The part "watching West Ham at home" should better have been "closest to the stadium" or something. By the way, IF you want to study some interesting talk-pages (over next to nothing, one might think), then can I especially recommend this one Talk:Danish pastry and open the part that is hidden, just below the headline Exotic names? (just press "show"). Boeing720 (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Ham ?
Talk:Clifden

message: Can someone pull the article up so that it's not out of alignment. Thanks. RiverHockey 22:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Center

message: Hi, I do not speak Irish. However, Tim Robinson's Gazetteer of Connemara says: "An Clochán(?), the stepping stones, the original crossing place on the river, the name was fashionably anglicised as Clifden in the early 19th Cent."
Could someone comment on this versus the "stone cell/beehive"-version? Thanks!Drow69 (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish placename 

message: Nice part about the Civil War, but a bit long. I think it might by a worthy idea to create an article about the two wars in the Connemara instead of squeezing it into the Clifden article. The Banner talk 18:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why I suggested to widen it to Connemara, instead of Clifden. But even then there is not enough for a separate article to your opinion? The Banner talk 13:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil War 

message: The Connemara View ceased publication in 2010. As a result these links are now dead. I can't access wayback machine from here, so I just took out the dead links. If anyone can replace them, please do so. 
Here's the original text:
"Clifden gained prominence after 1905 when Guglielmo Marconi decided to build his first high power transatlantic long wave wireless telegraphy station four miles (6 km) south of the town to minimize the distance to its sister station in Glace Bay, Nova Scotia. The first point-to-point fixed wireless service connecting Europe with North America opened for public service with the transmission of 10,000 words on 17 October 1907. At peak times, over 400 people were employed by the Clifden wireless station, among them Jack Phillips, who later died as chief Radio Operator on the Titanic."
Drow69 (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Marconi

message: This (94.230.109.176) IP editor tried twice in two consecutive days to put up a personal website link here, as well as on Letterfrack and Connemara National Park and Kylemore Abbey. I'll undo it for now, but maybe some further steps need to be taken.Drow69 (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to personal website 
Talk:Urbis

message: We've done some adding to the pages from the Urbis POV. However, I'd like to take down the 'controversy over funding' title and incude that para in the history section. There hasn't been any controversy over funding in 2006, and its something of a past story. Any objections? VaughanAllen 09:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Funding controversy

message: Have taken out the quote from Paul Wheeler of Manchester Grammar School as a) its not sourced and b)I believe it refers to the original interactives in Urbis, none of which are now in place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.108.114.98 (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MGS

message: I have added a small section on the proposed relocation of the National Football Museum to the site of Urbis. I think I've written this from an objective point of view, but if not, please feel free to change as you see fit. Tong22 (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Proposed Closure'''

message: Please do not restore ungrammatical content as it was very difficult to understand. Thank you--J3Mrs (talk) 14:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not restore ungrammatical content 
Talk:Tracy-Ann Oberman

message: TAO has written a play about Joan Crawford and Bette Davis and the filming of Whatever happened to baby Jane? Anyone know what it is called? Oberman is playing Crawford and Tate is Davis..... Also, not sure if it is a radio play or something for BBC 4, etc.? ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 21:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New play with Catherine Tate 

message: Appeared on Weakest Link BBC1 30th December 2023. Its also important to note that it is her second time appearing on Weakest Link. Percy2345 (talk) 20:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weakest Link
Talk:Umbral calculus

message: Is this the same thing as selector calculus? —Keenan Pepper 21:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It could well be related, but there's not enough information in that article to be sure. Michael Hardy 23:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Please be specific.  Comments with no specificity don't help. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

text: If you mean saying the old umbral calculus was ad hoc, that there was a failed attempt to fix it and later it was done properly, then the survey in the pdf in the externals is good on that and I certainly think it is fair description. Dmcq (talk) 06:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The computation there makes no sense (or is very badly explained). Is there any relation between B_n(x) and L(something) when x is nonzero?--Blaisorblade (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, now I got it, I didn't recognize that one step was just expanding a Bernoulli polynomial. Still, there was no example of why the calculation provided motivates the computation. So I proved the expansion relation for Bernoulli polynomials. Note that I made it up after reading a bit on http://www.romanpress.com/MathArticles/TheoryI.pdf, where I just learned again on linear operators. Still, I trust you can check the proof - write me a message if it doesn't work, so that I get notified.--Blaisorblade (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The modern umbral calculus 

message: Taking indices as exponents is not absurd: in the case of one variable and P-finite sequences, an is the constant term of diffn(A), with diff the differential operator and A the generating function of a. The concept is readily applied to several variables, e.g. Riordan arrays. --SCIdude (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not absurd 

message: Terms like “proof” and “shadowy” should be removed, and instead stick to a clear explanation of what umbral calculus is. I think the entire introduction is confusing. Reading it I gain zero intuition. Something shouldn’t be portrayed as mystical, magical or something that defies understanding. There just need to be clear statements. 120.21.217.39 (talk) 08:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove flowery confusing language
Talk:Howard King (public-address announcer)

message: Is this guy notable enough? The article should explain his notability. -- Mikeblas 21:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Malla (tribe)

message: At which time the Malla lived? History needs time. johanthon 11:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled