lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bath coup

message: There. Someone should double-check the example though; superficially, I think I got it right, but I'm too tired to verify it. Duja 15:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems fine to me. It seems a 50:50 shot that declarer will play a heart first rather than a club mind. (Though you have mentioned this.) Cambion 16:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I feel the explanation of the use of a Bath Coup is weak. As declarer you must take tricks, if you begin immediately with the Ace and lose even one trick along the way, it is likely the opponents will run their suit.  The article uses the word "tempo" and that is not wrong, but it seems a little weak.  With a Bath Coup, you let the opponents take the first trick of the suit but then they are stuck. Their opportunity to run their suit is greatly reduced. If declarer can keep the same fellow in the lead who has the long suit, if declarer can prevent the opposite declarer from leading through him, then declarer can take two tricks in the suit.  And, additionally, declarer still has his good Ace.  "tempo" is not really a wrong description and every author will describe it differently. Terryeo 19:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks :-). Is "tempo" worth adding to the Contract bridge glossary or is it self-telling? The concept is a bit difficult to explain briefly... Duja 15:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification needed

message: Is it really a good play to lead the King here? AFAIK the King led against NT usually promises both the Queen and the Jack (or it can be led from a short suit with AK). Roman V. Odaisky 14:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, king from KQ10 is quite a common lead, especially if supported by a 9 ; it may help pinning an opponent's jack, if it's located in a doubleton, and if not, small one will sell the trick anyway. KQxxx is another story, and small one is common there; see opening lead. Duja► 14:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  K from KQ1098
Talk:Mahtab

message: Mahtaab - okay - but what about HadO?
~~ Wathiik (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahtaab or HadO?  

message: Appears to be the same name/surname, just different transliterations. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 12:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Mehtab]] into [[Mahtab]]
Talk:Relish

message: I wonder, is the fact that "Gentleman's Relish" was invented by John Osborn the reason that singer Joan Osborne chose to name her debut album "Relish"?  The similar names might be an incredible coincidence, but now I have to wonder.  If there's any way to verify this hunch, it would be worth noting in the article. - Ugliness Man 15:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gentleman's Relish

message: Are relish and piccalilli the same thing?  This should be clarified on both pages.96.238.45.90 (talk) 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picalilli

message: I have heard this described as a relish. I think it has more in common with most relish than most salsa, wot wot?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pico de Gallo 

message: I am new here, but something caught my eye.
A notable relish is the Gentleman's Relish, which was invented in 1828 by Ben Elvin and contains spiced anchovy.
This is in the article, but if you follow the link provided the article for gentleman's relish....
Gentleman's Relish is a type of anchovy paste. It is also known as Patum Peperium.
It was created in 1828 by an Englishman called John Osborn.[1] 
References
^ Trust, National (2007-06-17). Gentleman's Relish: And Other English Culinary Oddities (A Gourmet's Guide). Warrington: National Trust Books (Anova Books). p. 144. . Retrieved 10-5-2008.
24.9.192.10 (talk) 19:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gentleman's Relish 

message: Just a note - while cooked chutneys originate from India, it was the British who developed the process: prior to that, Indian chutneys consisted of raw fruits/vegetables.  This may be worth differentiating in the commentary.  Signed DonaNobisPacem  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.92.196.168 (talk) 21:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chutney 

message: Isn't that a mayonnaise based sauce, not a relish? Otherwise, should we add Thousand Island dressing, Russian sauce, and sauce Remoulade as well? -- megA (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tartar sauce? 

message: We should have a photo of the stereotypical North American green relish here -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 19:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: North American (U.S.) Green Relish

message: I have removed the following content below from the article, placing it on this talk page. After working on the article, I have had difficulties verifying this content, although some of it may be true. North America1000 17:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed content
Talk:165 (number)

message: Why on earth does this redirect to 160 (number) without any explanation? This is just wierd.  – b_jonas 15:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange redirect? {{resize|60%|({{Abbr|Posted without title|Title added by User:Askarion on January 13, 2024}})}}

message: Neither of those entries is at all notable.
* One doesn't say it's a record.
* The second is, at best, a team record.
* And neither has a source. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 04:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think that none of the "in sports" sections in number pages are relevant to the number itself. Dhrm77 (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I removed them. Some records could be notable if referenced, and if important to the sport in some way, however these do not seem to be exceptional. Radlrb (talk) 18:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Sports
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Roy Gordon Lawrence

message: I moved the above comments from the AFD subpage, because people kept putting comments (sometimes unsigned), at the very top.  This is disruptive, and messes up the flow of the discussion.  Everything above was originally written by somebody else.  Also, it appears these comments were by people directly involved, and not regular wikipedians. --Rob 07:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why comments moved

message: Keep: What is really very stupid is to delete 90% of the page during the discussion. I keep puting it back so the Wikipedia community can see what is being discussed. Some one with an agenda keeps removing the page so how can people decide if it should stay or go? Makes no sense at all! Let the people decide and let them see what they are supposed to be judging as an article. Right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.139.46.4 (talk • contribs) .
some of the other delete comments come from the small group Lawrence now teaches. 
Obviously, they respect him as their Bible teacher, but do not want others to know or they may not come to this church or stay. Which begs the quesiotn, who is watching the children? Almost all the deletes I recognise (initials and names) as people who belong to the Roy Group.
==STRONG KEEP== original was too wordy and it was cleaned up by some very gifted Wikipedia editors.  It has a valid place here. As mentioned, why pages and bio stubbs on RC pedophiles while we delete the ones on the Protestant at THE REQUEST of the member of the church where he now ministers. For the record, Andyru is as biased as anyone and put up the Wikipedia page (just an advertisement really)  for the church where Lawrence teaches. Get this, Lawrence is doing a series, at least ten parts, on triumph over temptation.  Facts are facts.  Who am I to speak - I am the Senior pastor who Lawrence tried to replace early 2004. He resigned before we could fire him. Andyru may appear under other names to get what he wants - or he may have other Ottawa church members help him sway this discussion.
*'Follow- up Comment:' I am not denying that I attend the church that Roy Gordon Lawrence currently attends.  That is evident if you look at the articles I have written on Wikipedia.   I have not posted on this page under any other identity than my own.  The above post by the author of the Roy Gordon Lawrence article (Williamo1) further proves my concerns that this article is going to be a battleground.  Hence my recommendation to remove from Wikipedia.  I have no animosity towards Williamo1... I'm just concerned that this article's intent is to disparage its subject.  Andyru 19:59, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep
Talk:Colt Studio Group

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WHY WON'T NOTABLE PEOPLE HAVE THEIR OWN PAGES LIKE CHASE HUNTER & DARIN HAWK!?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.106.240 (talk) 04:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY 
Talk:HMS Emerald

message: this site http://www.pdavis.nl/ShowShip.php?id=69 identifies an HMS Emerald of 1856 or so.GraemeLeggett 15:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ought to add that the dates fit in with the name being in constant use, as one ship is removed another takes the name.GraemeLeggett 15:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates? 

message: I discovered an ancestor of mine on the HMS Emerald on the 1861 English census (RG9 4493) when it was docked in Hamoaze, Devonport, verified by the log here . Yet, this article indicates a gap between the 4th and 5th Emerald, 1847 to 1876. Is anyone able to explain this or have I discovered a missing ship?  MortimerCat 17:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about 1861 

message: In answer to both of the above, Colledge lists a wood screw frigate launched in 1856 and sold in 1869.  Not a missing ship as such, but one that has unaccountably failed to appear in the list page thus far. I'll add it now. Benea (talk) 05:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing ship?
Talk:Prostaglandin

message: I removed "15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2)is a PGD2 derivative that acts on PPAR intracellular receptors" because this proposition has since been proven false. 
Mazzo 01:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 15PGJ2

message: I don't understand adding a Parturition link right after the childbirth one.  Not only do they mean the same thing, but Parturition just gets redirected to childbirth.  But I'm leaving the link in for the moment. David.Throop 15:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Childbirth commences with labour. Parturition commences with the actual moving of the child through the birth canal. In other words: if labour is not progressing to parturition, prostaglandins may be of help. JFW | T@lk 00:23, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paturition link

message: Prostaglandins and prostaglandin-like substances have also been found in plants. This fact maybe should be mentioned in the article.
Tavilis 19:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plants prostaglandins 

message: isn't this a prostaglandin too? should it go in the chart?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.28.128 (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[cytotec]] 

message: What three animals will prostaglandin injections not work on?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.15.193 (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What three animals will prostaglandin injections not work on? 

message: This article focuses on Series 2 prostaglandins (derivatives of Arachidonic Acid) and basically ignores series 1 (DHGLA derivatives and series 3 (EPA derivatives). I feel like this article needs to be completely overhauled but I don't know where to begin. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 1 and 3 prostaglandins 

message: I see a lot of advertisements for trimix gel. Is this a thing? (See Talk:Trimix (injection)]]. 76.194.214.123 (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimix gel?
Talk:Beacon Park

message: Hi, Thank you for reviewing the article, all of your recommendations were spot on and made the article more readable and accurate. I have even gone so far as to reword entire sections i am not happy with. I have cleared up all the citation problems. However i cannot page number the book references as i only loaned the books and have not got them anymore. If everything is ok now can you declare this a good article. Bs0u10e01 (talk) 14:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been out of town for a few days, but I haven't forgotten. I'll get the review finished later today or perhaps tomorrow. Folklore1 (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You can get to know about the American Birds which is essential for our environment. Birdzfly (talk) 08:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Birds for Thesis
Talk:The Courtship of Princess Leia

message: *What's the planetary demonym for Reboam? Is it Reboaman or what?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.13.16.53 (talk) 19:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reboam planetary demonym
Talk:12th Army (Wehrmacht)

message: Doesn't "oberkommando" refer only to the headquarters of the Army, not the Army itself?  I'm questioning the German translation given in the intro.Michael Dorosh 16:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On page 379 of Berlin the downfall 1945, Beevor reports that Holste abandoned his command of the LXI Panzer Corps and fled to the west. This was much to the disgust of other officers, summed up in the words one of them "You can leave Hitler, because he's a criminal, but you can't leave your soldiers". But that is the only reference to the Holste and his Corps, so was the Corps part of the Twelfth or some other Army like the Ninth? --PBS 19:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lt General Holste
Talk:Full-spectrum dominance

message: Note: Discussion page has recently been cleared due to a complete lack of appropriate content. Per WP:TALK discussion pages exist to discuss changes and improvements to the article, not as a platform for personal views. Please do not add content inappropriate for Wikipedia's talk pages.
The quote by Harold Pinter is probably not appropriate.  He was known for being intensely bitter about US foreign policy.  I would bet that in the quote he is applying the military doctrine as if it were a foreign policy doctrine as a means of venting his anger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.87.1.204 (talk) 23:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of his credibility, the comment is 14 years old. Technology is not stagnant. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Annie Emily Lawrence

message: I think the article should stay because of her role in Tasmanian history and the usefullness the information could be for local historians. Mccready 16:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would help if the article explained her role. As it stands, it merely says she is one of an indefinite number of squatters. Sam Vimes 17:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I have to agree. The article does not specify what role she played in Tasmanian history. Cnwb 05:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Sweetest Apu

message: James Lipton is talking to Rainier Wolfcastle on a parody "Inside the actors studio" is in this episode. Why is this not mentioned in the article?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.72.233.8 (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So what the hell is her name anyway? It was originally Amber in here, and in the List of characters from The Simpsons, but 24.51.225.232 keeps changing it to Annette. And I can't find her name anywhere else, did she even have one at all? Adam Bishop 05:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Squishee Lady

message: What's the deal with the Civil War recreation and the North, South, and East? I know its a joke, and they look funny, but is there something about the East I'm missing? PolarisSLBM 04:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The East? 

message: The current image is from The Two Mrs. Nahasapeemapetilons. It even appears on that article's page. Misterkillboy 07:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it back to the original, albeit low quality image. Maybe a different, higher quality image from the episode can be uploaded? Misterkillboy 07:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The chalk gag is "I will not lie about being canceled again", Does anyone know what this is referring to?
It is referring to a rumor in England at the time where people thought The Simpsons was cancelled according to episodes trivia section at TV.com.Simpsonguy (talk) 13:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chalk gag

message: Should be something on the divorce lawyer ("in the case of Lawyers v.s Justice" etc.). AnonMoos (talk) 03:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Divorce lawyer

message: 'They then confront Apu and he says he will break up with Annette. However, he breaks his promise (as it gets his mind off the octuplets and she forces him).'
There is no indication that Apu cheated to get his mind off the octuplets. In fact, the implication is that he did it because of his non-existent sex life w/ Manjula. Also, what does 'she forces him' even mean? Removed the bracketed part in the above quote.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.32.87 (talk) 22:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot insinuation removed
Talk:Adana kebabı

message: ==Raki with Adana-kebab????==
Never heard of that combination (but never went to Adana). Is it really usual??? Bertilvidet 16:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Raki is the pimp for all meat.--Kagan the Barbarian 21:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I will actually try to do it this weekend :) Baristarim 05:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Never heard of that combination (but never went to Adana). Is it really usual??? Bertilvidet 16:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Raki is the pimp for all meat.--Kagan the Barbarian 21:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Raki with Adana-kebab????

message: Someone go out tomorrow and order a big Adana kebap and while you are on it, take a photo and upload it here.--Kagan the Barbarian 21:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will actually try to do it this weekend :) Baristarim 05:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article overhaul 

message: Urfa kebap... as well is same without spices and more a city kebap.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.47.155.30 (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adana kebab without chillers 
Talk:Paolo Rossi

message: He also was in trouble for match fixing.
This piece is treated under "Scandal" with references. From what I have read, the allegations were based on very thin evidence.Doktorschley (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure he was. He had the #20 shirt. By then his knees were completely shot, and he did not play. Please see 
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convocazioni_per_il_campionato_mondiale_di_calcio_1986.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbli (talk • contribs) 05:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems there is a lot more information on the Italian wiki, is it possible to incorporate that into here? Govvy (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info from the Italian wiki
Talk:Cornelius Van Til

message: The phrase problem of the one and the many is wikilinked to the page Problem of universals, yet there is no mention of the former phrase in the target page. This needs to be remedied somehow. DFH 19:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The problem of the one and the many 

message: Just a small thing I know, but in the sentence:
"He began teaching at Princeton Seminary, but shortly went with the conservative group that founded Westminster Theological Seminary, where he taught for forty-three years of his life."
When I get to "of his life" I start pondering what other kind of years Van Til might have had, and my thoughts no longer follow the article. I suggest that the sentence be changed to "... where he taught for the next forty-three years," or even more succinctly, "... where he taught for forty-three years."Jim P. (talk) 02:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography 

message: The author frequently refers to Van Til or his views as “Calvinist”. This is generally used as a pejorative. Dr. Van Til’s theology is more accurately described (as he did himself) as Reformed. Reformed Theology is much more broad than just the views of Jean Calvin. 2600:1004:B153:98FA:A0E0:2ED5:814E:FDD7 (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest that you read the article more carefully.  The term "Calvinist" or "Calvinism" is only used 4 times in the entire article, and only one of those could be assumed to refer to Van Til (the other three describe other individuals or institutions).  Although I'm generally inclined to agree with the premise that "Reformed" is a more suitable label, the suggestion that "" is a little over-the-top considering the actual infrequency of the term in the article - especially considering the most prominent use of it is  (emphasis added). ButlerBlog (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term “Calvinist”
Talk:Process design

message: The lists at least need formatting; I guess separaste main articles for Chemical / Software / Business Process design are needed.  The article doesn't link in with enough other material on Wikipedia. — Stumps 16:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You were entirely correct that this article needed a lot of clean up and Wikifying. I did quite a bit of that today and I think that the cleanup tag can now be removed ... which I shall do.  However, that is not to say that the article could not still benefit by more editing and expansion. - mbeychok 07:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Flagged Feb 2006

message: And the hatnote now takes care of it to my satisfaction. Regarding my article-scope edits (this edit and this edit), and then Mbeychok's rebuttal, OK—it's a language-usage thing. It's not that the designing of processes doesn't happen outside of chemical engineering, as well—for example, designing processes and systems is what industrial engineering is all about—it's just that the set phrase "process design" has a long history of usage specifically in its chemical engineering sense, which is the specific topic that this article is about. This usage-difference discussion reminds me also of this discussion, where it was drawn out upon discussion that nowadays there are subtractive processes that can make prototypes rapidly, but the set phrase "rapid prototyping" has had a long life referring only to the original additive sense. In this article's case, I am satisfied now, with the improved hatnote. — ¾-10 16:31, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And I'm happy that you are happy. mbeychok (talk) 17:26, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Designing of processes happens outside of chemical engineering, too, but that's covered elsewhere
Talk:Right of way (disambiguation)

message: In English law -- from which the term easement derives there are many forms of right of way which are not easements, for example highways, footpaths and so on. An easement can only exist to benefit another plot of land it cannot exist for the benefit of a group of people or the general public. It may be that that distinction has been lost in (eg) the US, but its still very real here. It is therefore wrong for this page to muddle the two as if they are really the same sort of thing actually. Francis Davey 14:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I re-iterate that point. Rights of Way are only a subspecies of easement in *some* jurisdictions (I believe the US) thus this page is POV and needs editing. One solution would be to remove all references to easement from it. Shall I do that or is there another way? Francis Davey 12:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easements 