lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bullocks Wilshire

message: Hmm... Why is that photo pink? Seems not to be the right color, since other pics in Commons are not pink. Therefore it is not a truthful picture of the building. 82.141.95.217 (talk) 08:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Krbava Field

message: Pardon me, but if this is an attempt at translation of the name of Krbava field it's ludicrous (especially without corroboration). For all we know, the field is named after the river Krbava. Therefore I've deleted it. If that's some poetic take on the name, it's still out of place here (any  battlefield could be named "the field of blood") Zoran M 10:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The field of ''blood''?

message: The loss figures of Croatian side don't seem realistic. The strength of the army is 8000 infantry and 2000-3000 cavalry. That makes 10000-11000. The loss is 8000-10000 killed and 1500 POW. The higher limit is more than the total strength. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loss figures
Talk:Battle of Pichincha

message: Unification of the discussion in one place. (see here) --Muwatallis II (talk) 02:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy over the aggregation of the British Legion in the infobox 
Category talk:Stamp designers

message: While browsing the German and French Wikipedias I was able to link to several designers that were not categorised previously. There are several more designers on these pages:   whose articles do not yet have an English page if anyone needs some leads. This brings the list up 50+ Cheers. ww2censor 17:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember, translators, for French intels about philately in France, you can ask me questions (even on en.user page, I travel there twice a week). Sebjarod 18:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I might take you up one some translation, or at least tidying up some new articles if you don't mind. Thanks for the offer. ww2censor 05:19, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More designers linked 

message: Can William Wyon, Alfred Edward Chalon and Dorothy Wilding be considered stamp designers while their work was not create for a philatelic purpose, but inspired designers and engravers afterwards? Sebjarod (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-use of artwork on stamps 

message: Removed some from category where no evidence they designed stamps in article or they only designed one or two stamps but were mainly known for something else. Maidonian (talk) 11:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: There should probably be some consensus as to what this category covers. I've just clarified in the article that designers of fake and fraudulent material are excluded—hope there's agreement on that. But there's still a grey area in the middle. Roughly, the following would be five different classes, followed by my assessment of relevance to this category.
* Designers, engravers etc who have been commissioned by postal authorities to design stamps, often producing many designs over a long period (definite include).
* Artists who's work was used on stamps, but weren't directly involved in stamp creation; as per Re-use above, or the "Artists of stamps of the United States" page currently linked (include, or maybe have a separate category for this?)
* Winners of design-a-stamp competitions, etc. Often designers in this category are never heard of again, so notability may be questionable (I'll remain neutral)
* Designers of "personalized" stamps or similar that many postal services allow these days. In this category a designer could be "anyone with a check book" and fails notability (exclude)
* Designers of fake and fraudulent stamp-like items. (definite exclude).
Zaqrfv (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What should be included in this category? 

message: The listing for the American stamp designer Clair Aubrey Houston appears under "C" but should be moved to "H."  I do not know how to do this, but hope someone can make this change.BFolkman (talk) 14:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetization
Talk:Shuttlecock sport

message: Can someone explain why there are articles on shuttlecock, featherball, jianzi and shuttlecock sport? Some of this looks identical so should be merged or redirected. --JJay 17:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted all the poetic descriptions (lovely, but uninformative), checked the historical information from the European organization (copyrighted), and was left with nothing substantially different than what's on the "shuttlecock" and "badminton" pages. Thus I have redirected to "shuttlecock". Her Pegship 15:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Sink (disambiguation)

message: Doesn't seem necessary since none of the other uses have articles ("Dictionary definitions don't belong here..." and "Disambiguation pages are not intended for games of "free association". Please use them carefully and only when needed." from Wikipedia:Disambiguation), but at least should be properly capped Sink (disambiguation) if kept. 24.17.48.241 18:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term Sink also applies to electronics where an output rather than provide power, provides a path to ground for the power that drives a device. It sinks the current.Septagram 04:47, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Electronics Sink
Category talk:Lenses

message: I have moved photographic lenses into their own category, and moved other types of lens from :category:optics and :category:optical devices into this category.--Srleffler 18:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I was just wondering some things...
what is a lens called that is used specifically for heating objects?  Is that a practical use?  Are there manufacturers of such lenses?
thanks :)
BriEnBest 22:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A burning-glass, perhaps?--Srleffler 04:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  help 

message: I'm wondering if we need to migrate the current children of this category into one called 'Optical lenses' given the existence of non-optical ones like this. Ditto for the lenses used in electron microscopes.  Hooperbloob (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would rather keep the optical usage of the term at the simpler category name, since optical lenses by far dominate. Perhaps we could create :category: Non-optical lenses as a subcat, to hold the few articles on non-optical lenses.--Srleffler (talk) 05:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-optical lenses
Talk:Powerglide

message: -- Worth mentioning that the Opel Diplomats 1966/1967 were also equipped with the Powerglide  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.251.131.226 (talk) 09:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

message: above the tranny lines is bolt looking gismo but the head on it just spins around. what is it for?173.22.134.46 (talk) 15:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is it? 

message: There was another reason we called this transmission the "Slip and Slide Powerglide" back in the day.  
After many of them got about 80,000 miles on them they would have difficulty going from low to high gear.  
They would "slip" and "slip" and finally "slide" into high gear.  You could sometimes finesse the gas pedal 
when this happened and help the thing shift. Sometimes the shifting action got so slow as to be almost non-existant,
in which case the driver would start out in low and shift into high when the rpm's got high enough.
 2602:306:BDC0:CF90:44DA:6DA1:DAA5:874C (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Slip and Slide

message: Reference number 1 is not a book titled Every Model, Every Year, which I could not find, but is a book called Every Model, Year by Year, which can be seen here .
Maybe the person who used the book firsthand can explain the error in titling the book. I have also noticed the same error on other pages, that include Plymouth Cambridge, Lincoln H-series, 1957 Ford and more, which is why I perefer not to edit it myself just yet.
Andreas.nolvak (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I came here to have a look at the details of how this transmission actually works, but the article is underwhelmingly sparse with the description bit. The article definitely needs some attention. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does a Powerglide transmission work?
Talk:Bunty Aur Babli

message: The synopsis is written as a review with personal opinion. This should BE REVISED to just state what happened (which is  what a synopsis is). Not that someone is "on fire" with their performance, or that some songs could have been left out.
DH —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Utcursch (talk • contribs) 09:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who on Earth is this Nikhil guy (with no wikipedia article)? --anskas 20:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nikhil? 

message: Proposal to merge the article Bunty Aur Babli (soundtrack) into this article Bunty Aur Babli. The content together is better for reading. Also the destination page size can accommodate merger. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk)  09:57, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Shepardson Microsystems

message: I notice that a lot of documents on the web as well as some books, such as Your Atari Computer, refer to Sheperdson BASIC. Is this nothing more than a very common spelling error? --Wernher 18:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Google, "shepardson microsystems" gives 222 hits and "sheperdson microsystems" gives 80 hits. The Google hit-count is the closest reference I have to the correct spelling. I have created a redirect Sheperdson Microsystems that redirects to Shepardson Microsystems. Ae-a 01:52, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Shep''a'' rdson vs. Shep''e'' rdson

message: From 1978 to 1994, CES was held twice each year: once in January in Las Vegas known as Winter Consumer Electronics Show (WCES)  2001:7C0:2041:1AA:0:0:0:DB (talk) 12:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CES
Talk:Finlandia hymn

message: The subject matter of Finlandia Hymn seems to overlap with that on the main Finlandia article. Is there a need for two seperate articles, particularly as Finlandia is surely a more popular search term than Finlandia Hymn, but is actually the most sketchy article of the two? HAM  15:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: 'finlandia-hymni' now redirects here
---- Daniel Jones (talk) 11:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: Remeber that V. A. Koskenniemi died 1962 and the words are free after year 2032 because copyright time in whole Europe are 70 years.
All translations that are made from finnish versions, will have also copyrighted, so my proposal are that shall we remove translations also--Musamies (talk) 05:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  V. A. Koskenniemi died 1962, the words are free after year 2032 

message: please explain why you think  is not notable. The fact that the artist has an article is indicative of notability. If you don't think the artist is actually notable, that's another matter that calls for an AfD for that article. Ibadibam (talk) 21:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantus 

message: The initial paragraph does not mention 'We rest on thee', though there is quite a lot about it later.
I will add it to the initial paragraph myself. Mdrb55 (talk) 12:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Hymns
Talk:The Saw Doctors

message: Is this article really a stub?
I can't imagine a printed encyclopedia including more information on a band than this.
I reckon the article is pretty much as complete as it needs to be. Bandraoi 19:04, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: stub

message: isn't 'whole lot of loving' by six ireland's biggest seller, goggle searching either song shows claims for both, although the saw doctors mainly seem to have come up from an article about them winning the meteor lifetime achievement award, which this page is almost entirely plagiarised from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.91.0 (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biggest selling single

message: "drummers Padraig Stevens, John Donnelly (drummer), Jimi Higgins, and Fran Breen."
John Donnelly is a drummer so he does not need drummer after his name? 20:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  By very nature
Talk:John Hopcroft

message: Uses of automata throry
:Should this constitute a feature request? Hermel (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: J.E Hopcroft and R.E. Tarjan, "Efficient planarity testing", J. Assoc. Comput. Math., 21 pp 549-568 (1974) and R.E. Tarjan is known to have EN2. pom 15:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is EN2 and EN3, respectively? Hermel (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  EN3 certificate 
Talk:Patty Maloney

message: did she have to wear a mask to play lumpy in the star wars holiday special?
Not a mask as such. I think it was more like having costume fur applied directly to her face. JHVipond 22:23, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patty as Lumpy 

message: "Preceded by" / "Succeeded by" in what? Hawke666 22:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession box 

message: *This needs to be edited to reflect a scholarly article. I am not convinced this meets WP standards for notability. WP is no place for personal hobbies and the like. (She enjoys knitting?) I will submit this article for deletion if not corrected soon. Bro2baseball (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you kidding me? 

message: * Geniac, what is the reason for marking and re-marking the image for Speedy Deletion? Dprust (talk) 04:21, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image marked for Speedy Deletion? 

message: * I expanded the "Personal life" section regarding Patty's marriage to Joseph Vitek. Patty said on Joan Quinn Profiles that she had been married for about 6½ years, so I assumed that their wedding was in the latter half of 1961, since Joseph died in February 1968. Alas, my searches of newspapers.com have not turned up any record of their wedding. Can anyone point me to an acceptable source? JHVipond (talk) 22:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wedding date? 

message: This article is starting to become an indiscriminate collection of Patty's TV and movie roles. I think her roles would be better presented in a tabular format. JHVipond (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table for Patty's roles?
Talk:Maxwell House

message: Having increased market share with the Jews through the The Maxwell House Hagaddah, Jacobs, their advertiser, hired the Pope to increase their market share amongst Catholics.
It is believed that Jacobs secured several audiences with the Pope, aiming to have the wording of The Lord’s Prayer adjusted from “Give us this day our daily bread” to “Give us this day our daily coffee”. At first the Pope was not interested, so Jacobs offered a donation of $1,000,000. Again the Pope declined. After several offers, Maxwell House authorised the payment of a 10% royalty to The Vatican on every jar of coffee sold in all catholic-majority countries. The Pope accepted. Maxwell House were delighted because sales would increase tenfold. 
When asked by his cardinals about the Maxwell House negotiations, the Pope told them he had good news and bad news. 
The good news: “The [[The Vatican is receiving $100 million dollars in royalties from Maxwell House”
The bad news: “We’ve lost the Wonder Bread account.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.252.146.160 (talk) 16:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Lowery (actor)

message: I've rewritten this page from completely, albeit based on the old page and with somewhat less information. I am extremely suspicious that this is a copyvio. The content of this page appeared to have been a combination of his IMDB biography and an obituary. One of the comments in the history would imply that the copy had been written by a relative, but since that is also the credit on the IMDB I'm not positive if the person indicating that they wrote it (and were the relative) or simply that it had been written by the relative. Since it's not all clear and there was a cleanup note here anyway, I redid it. Please feel free to add back any pertinent info that I missed. JRP 19:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm removing the link for the 1945 film "Prison Ship".  The link connects to the page for a 1986 film by that name.  Elsquared67 (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing link
Template talk:Myth-stub

message: Could we possibly have a difference picture? The dragon is _exactly_ the same as the Welsh dragon in  which made me think I was about to be told it was a Wales-related stub. chowells 19:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Just to let you guys at WikiProject Paranormal know, I've changed it to say WikiProject Mythology instead, as it is that project's "domain". No hard feelings, if any. Lemegeton 22:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed WikiProject
Talk:List of R-phrases

message: 04-May-09: The chemical-risk Template:Rlink can be used to generate labeled text-links to the list article ("List of R-phrases"), for any existing, or future, R-code. For example:
::: - generates "" (view the mouse-over text).
For more details about using that template, see the page Template:Rlink. -Wikid77 (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Rlink links to R-phrases

message: Should we be pointing out that GHS hazard statements are superseding these - and/or at least link to them from this page? 62.196.17.194 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transition to GHS?
Talk:U.S. Route 223

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
Just some I found in the Google News Archives. Imzadi 1979 → 08:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some print sources for the history 
Talk:List of S-phrases

message: Why is there no S10 or S11?? 66.32.191.30 21:15, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  S10 and S11 

message: Look at the section labelled "Sierra" at User:Georgia guy/Letter number combinations. Any opinions on putting the meanings of this article's phrases in the appropriate dis-ambiguation pages?? (Currently, the Sierra section goes to S6. Note the rule is to stop when a combination with no dis-ambiguation page is reached.) Georgia guy 02:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no opinion either way; you could always try putting them on and seeing if anyone objects (although disambig pages aren't widely watched). Don't forget that there is also a List of R-phrases which goes with this one. Physchim62 (talk) 03:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem to answer 

message: For chemicals with phrase S33 "Take precautionary measures against static discharges." How do you go about this?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.59.212 (talk • contribs) 08:31, August 25, 2006 (UTC)
:Above comment was relocated into a section by , and signed.--The Navigators (talk) 23:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsigned comment

message: Marked with a note or placed in a section indicating they've fallen out of use, of course. I'm thinking someone might come across an old reference work that uses one of the deleted S phrases and want to find out what it meant, so we should have that information here for historical purposes. Bryan Derksen 00:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we get the deleted ones in here too?

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 9#S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 23:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:"Them" (King Diamond album)

message: To avoid confusion, it should say King Diamond in the Plot, not just King. When i saw it I thought it ment a king.♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 
Talk:Mode

message: Maybe adding some icons would help to clear up all the different modes (linguistics, physics, fashion, etc).
I'm sure most of these already have icons, all we'd need to do is find and link them.
--STGM 19:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a cool idea - I can add the philosophy icon later today.  FranksValli 20:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see MoS:DP before you do this. Tedernst | talk 18:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Icons

message: Per MoS:DP, entries on dab pages should have one link only, to the page being disambiguated.  I've removed these entries because they don't have such a link:
* In fashion, the mode is the trend followed by the largest number of people.
* In complex systems, in general, a mode is a specific type of operation: for example in a military avionics system, a fighter plane radar might be in track mode or scan  mode or track while scan mode, with distinctly different behavior and intention.
* In computer file systems, a common element of metadata in a file is the mode, which is usually understood to mean the type of the file and the set of permissions it has. See stat (Unix).
*** An example of waveguide mode: fiber optic mode.
*** An example of cavity mode: laser mode.
** An example of acoustic modes: An "ideal" guitar string of length L, fixed at both ends, will have modes in the shape of sin(nxπ/L), where n is the mode number.  See also: Ernst Chladni, cymatics.  If a circular drumhead rather than a string vibrates, the mathematics is different and more involved.
* In linguistics, mode is the channel of communcation such as spoken, written or signed.
* In philosophy, a mode is a non-necessary (contingent) property of a substance, as opposed to a necessary property, which is called an attribute.
When there is an article to link to, they can go back. Tedernst | talk 18:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: removed entries

message: i dont understand this anfd it got no mathematics one either —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.251.46.101 (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  i dont get it
Talk:Deerhurst

message: I've reverted the text taken straight from: 
http://www.deerhurstfriends.co.uk/historychurch.htm
Please do not add copyrighted text to Wikipedia
Ian Cairns 20:07, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Copyvio]]
Talk:Men into Space

message: Episode 12, Christmas on the Moon has an astronaut who complains about Christmas and religion. This immediately strikes you as strange in a country that was deeply Christian when this show was made. Later when a fellow astronaut comes down with appendicitis we find this atheist has turned into a Christian and prays for a miracle which of course happens. All it needed was for the man to shout: "Praise the Lord!" to make this nonsense complete. (193.250.60.129 (talk) 11:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: Regarding this addition to the "popular culture" section: 
:
:
While it is possible this may be accurate, we have a strict no original research policy. Per WP:PROVEIT, we'd need a reliable source that has come to this conclusion in order to add anything like this. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop Culture:'' [[Midnight Cowboy]]''