Talk:Hypolydian mode

message: The mode articles are a mess when taken together. The articles need to be standardized and some of the general information consolidated into the Musical mode article and removed from all the articles about specific modes. 
a few specific propositions:
corresponding information
:I think all the mode articles should have corresponding information in corresponding sections. For example, the intervals that define the mode should be given at say, somewhere near the top of the article in a section called "intervals" or something (whatever, as long as its standard for all articles and maximally descriptive). Also things like if the scale is "symmetric" or "asymmetiric" or whether its a "minor" or "major" scale should be all in one place (perhaps a table would be best for these things).
Information about modes in general
:All information that is about modes in general (i.e. applies to all modes) should be moved to the Musical mode article, and not mentioned in the articles about specific modes (all articles should of course be linked to the general Musical mode article).  Information about idiosyncratic properties of the modes then will be easier to find that way, and there will be no confused and redundant info (sorta like this paragraph). 
Greek vs. modern terminology confusion'
:Information about the confusion between the greek and modern terminology should stay in the Musical mode article, with a note at the top of each article--out of the main body--highlighting the terminology confusion (to eschew obfuscation). Perhaps there should be serperate disambiguable articles for the greek modes e.g. a article for Ionian (Greek Mode) and Ionian (Gregorian Mode). 
avoiding articl style divergence with later editors not privy to the standardization project
:As time passes, people who don't know about the effort to standardize the article no doubt will add information to the article in their own style, perhaps causing the articles to diverge in style over time. To avoid this, we can make a template to go at the top of each talk page that tells editors to keep in mind the style standardization (perhaps a project page--"metawiki pages" I think they are called--with a template and style explanation). Although this may not be that much of a problem, if the style is obvious and is suffieciently elegant to begin with. 
Am I getting across the idea here? What do you guys think about such a project? I know there is a way to set up a wikiproject for this sort of thing, but I've never done it before. I'll look into how to do it. Any other ideas on how to make the articles fit better together? Any objections or improvements to the above suggestions? Brentt 09:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Project for Mode Articles: Standardization and Consolidation

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 05:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeoman's duty, as ever, Hyacinth. Wikipedia owes you a debt of gratitude. I see nothing in the article that lacks a reference, and so have removed the stale banner.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations