lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bild

message: Re: Changes made from Bild-Zeitung to Bild: 
The paper's name was changed in the 90s to Bild. On the one hand, to shorten the title, on the other to make clear that it differed from regular newspapers.
*Support per nom. Whydontyoucallme dantheman (talk) 22:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added just these links: *German BBC. tabloid mocks UK tourists--Florentino floro (talk) 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Die BILD ist sicher nicht mehr rechtspopulistisch seitdem sie sich für die Merkelsche Asylpolitik stark macht. 
Die Behauptung sie sei sexistisch ist Blödsinn. Hier werden zwei verschiedene Dinge Erotik(Lebensfreude) und Sexismus(Diskriminierung von Menschen wegen ihres Geschlechts) mal wieder miteinander verwechselt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.98.99.82 (talk) 08:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Stimmt, ich ersetze das. Gruß --212.186.14.29 (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  BILD ZEITUNG 

message: Maybe in addition to (or even instead of) the case-based critic, I would suggest adding the statistic figures from https://de.statista.com/infografik/2588/publikationen-mit-den-meisten-ruegen-durch-den-deutschen-presserat/ where Bild is far number one since 1986. --Thomas Österheld (talk) 10:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics Presserat  

message: We have:
;Lede
:Bild is tabloid in style but broadsheet in size.
;'History' section
:Bild is published in tabloid format.
Which is correct? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size contradiction 

message: It states that Bild is the best selling European newspaper, but then compares it with the Sun, the second best selling European tabloid newspaper. Both of these comparisons should be using the same measure as either first and second best selling European newspapers or first and second best selling European tabloids.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheeFactChecker (talk • contribs) 21:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paper comparison
Talk:Minuteman Civil Defense Corps

message: There are a couple of cites claiming this is "wholly distinct" from the other Minuteman organization, but they were founded by the same person and have the exact same objectives as far as can be told from the articles here. Since there's really nothing added by this article, I suggest it be relegated to a subsection of the other article, if anything. Maybe for tax purposes they are "wholly distinct," but it's obvious that they are not really distinct.
66.74.216.147 (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with other minuteman article?

message: To include this was nothing short of a logical fallacy by implying that because one of their (expelled) members is a cold-blooded killer that all of them are. If anyone wants to include the line that was removed it must be fleshed out in a manner that is fair to all parties involved.
PinothyJ (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Link to Murders of Raul and Brisenia Flores
Talk:Robert Kraus

message: Hi Wikipedians!
I'm Rachel and I am the student from Professor Fuisz's Children's Literature Class at Georgetown University in charge of editing, improving, and expanding on the current article for Robert Kraus. I'm currently wrapping up the research phase of this project. Here is a link to my bibliography []. At this point I have five sources that include three total reviews on a handful of his children's books, two obituaries that capture details about his personal life and career that are absent in the current article, and a detailed biographical overview as well. I intend to publish information on his family and the influence that had on his career, as well as more specific details about his career as a whole. I also intend to create a new section for reception and analysis, and be more clear about which projects he was an author, illustrator, or publisher for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RSessa18 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 273 - Children's Literature
Talk:Sima Ai

message: Could an admin edit the title of this article? This person's name should be pronounced Sima Yi, not Sima Ai. I have already edited the text.
:Do you have a source for this?  What I see indicated that both are accepted pronunciations, and if that were the case, using Sima Ai avoids ambiguity with his great-grandfather.  --Nlu (talk) 07:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The anonymous editor is right. The person who originally edited this article has mistaken the character 乂 (which can only be pronounced as yì) with the character 艾, which can be pronounced as either aì or yì. See for yourself at this site here. To distinguish this Sima Yi from his great-grandfather, we can move this article to Sima Yi (Jin Dynasty), since the previous Sima Yi belonged exclusively to Cao Wei. What do you think?--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This must be a larger problem, one that must be sorted out even at Wiktionary, I'm afraid. Look here under the Mandarin heading for 乂, where the only pronunciation available is yì. This may merely be an example of the significant differences between PRC and ROC dictionaries' pronunciations.--Pericles of AthensTalk 17:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Might be, but as long as "Ai" is an accepted pronunciation under an authoritative source — and I'd consider the ROC MOE to be — I'd say there is no good reason to move the article.  The pronunciation of "Yi" can be noted as an alternative pronunciation.  (Indeed, the MOE dictionary, in another entry, noted Yi as the first pronunciation.  Ai was noted as the second pronunciation.)  I don't think we should resort to disambiguation unless we really need to disambiguate.  --Nlu (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just included the alternative pronunciation of "yi"; it only needs to be mentioned once and I no longer see any need to move the page or create a disambiguation page.--Pericles of AthensTalk 21:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:William Mathias

message: I am adding this new section, out of courtesy to other editors interested in working on the present article.
I re-organized the sections for citations (please consult the article's 'View History' for details). In particular, I also tried to find what text was corroborated by the reference to the Lyrita SRCD.328 CD; so, when I googled it, I found this link: http://www.lyrita.co.uk/cgi-bin/lyrita_index.pl?type=disc_category&disc_category=William  
When I delved into this link, I found text there that does not seem to contain any information relevant to any of the text in the article. So, I removed the reference; if anyone objects, then please let me know. But, for now, I think there is no point in including a reference to sleeve notes of a CD that includes text which itself does not corroborate any of the text in the article.
I have now also ordered this CD (along with two others of music by William Mathias), and expect to receive it within the next 3-4 weeks. Once I have received it, I will check the sleeve notes of SRCD.328 and, if more complete than available from the Lyrita website, I will re-instate the reference but use the standard wiki templates to anchor it on the text in the article. More generally, I will use the sleeve notes of these three CDs to complete the biographical information in the article.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.  (talk) 22:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References. 

message: Should there be a 'Recordings' section? Vinyl issue LPs to start could be:
EMI His Master's Voice ASD 3301 This Worlde's Joie, Price, Bowen, Rippon, St George's Chapel Choristers, NPO, c: Willcocks, r&i:76.
Decca SXL 6468
Decca SXL 6513 Piano Concerto no 3, Katin, LSO, c: Atherton, r&i:72. 
SXL 6607
Chandos ABRD 1115 Lux Aeterna, Lott, Cable, Walker, The Bach Choir, St George's Chapel Choristers, LSO, c: Willcocks, r&i:84, [D]
ARGO ZRG 882
BBC REC 222 Sinfonietta, Celtic Dances, Nat Youth Orchestra of Wales, c: Davison, r&i:75
I should be able to come up with more and I have some to hand. SovalValtos (talk) 21:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recordings 

message: ...please? 2001:8003:3020:1C00:702F:3FBB:6094:4478 (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of sirname ...
Talk:Bradford School (Pittsburgh)

message: Why would you tag an article about a school with "db-bio" only seconds after I've started working on it?? Highfructosecornsyrup 13:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the speedy tag - tertiary institutions do not qualify for speedy deletion. If an editor doubts the notability of this body then an AfD is the way to go. TerriersFan 18:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete tag
Talk:USS Ancon (AGC-4)

message: George Hicks was a reporter for NBC Blue aboard the Ancon during the D-Day landings.  He supposedly had a 75-pound recording device strapped on him and recorded a 13.5 minute segment that included the convoy being attacked by a Luftwaffe fighter that was shot down during this segment.  I don't know if this is something that would included in the segment while the Ancon was in the Atlantic, as an external reference item by itself, or somewhere else within the article.   One place to listen to this is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnomrhP6sVs - it should also be somewhere on Archive.org, but I haven't been able to find it after a quick search. Jtyroler (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Hicks
Talk:Off the Hook (radio program)

message: I've removed the information about being simulcast on WBCQ.  According to the station, "Off the Hook" is not currently scheduled. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WBCQ 

message: Hello.  I'm part of the show described in this article, and as such I'm limiting my participation to the talk page on this point; I just thought I'd point out that the "Possible Conclusion" section is a few years out-of-date, the situation described was short-lived, and we were open about getting past it with positive results.  Perhaps another title for the section could be used to reflect this. Rob T Firefly (talk) 08:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Possible conclusion" section 

message: Hi all. I'm not editing the article myself as I'm part of this show and therefore shouldn't mess with it, but I'd like to point out the "Current Lineup" section is out of date.
The current regular panel on the show, in addition to head producer Emmanuel Goldstein, is:
*Kyle
*Rob Vincent, a.k.a. Rob T Firefly (that's me)
*Gila Drazen
*Alexander Urbelis
*volt4ire
Alexander Urbelis should be moved from "past regular panelists" to "current," and Bernie S should be moved from "current" to "past."
Thanks to anyone who's in the mood to update this. Rob T Firefly (talk) 18:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current lineup
Talk:Zuidhorn

message: The term NS is included in the opening paragraph, having been added by 80.100.120.42.  What is the proper term to disambiguate this  to? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 14:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nederlandse Spoorwegen", the national railway company. Eugène van der Pijll 17:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "NS" reference in opening paragraph
Talk:Misael Pastrana Borrero

message: If the "tragedy of Santa Ana" is well known, do we have an article on it we could link to?  Do we have confirmation on this? RJFJR 14:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Propose merge of María Cristina Arango Vega into this (her husband's) article.  The article doesn't even suggest independent notability. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 23:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 19:25, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First lady 
Talk:Dove (chocolate brand)

message: *There is a tag on this page. To whoever wrote this, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a cyber-billboard next to a cyber-highway. 67.41.213.180 14:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Looks like corporate propaganda

message: I just had a 100g bar of US Dove. No messages inside either the outer wrapper or the inner gold foil, and as it was a slab it didn't have "individual chocolate piece[s]" at all. What does the text refer to? 86.132.142.45 (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messages? 

message: It seems that Dove and Galaxy chocolate are one and the same thing put have seperate pages. It seems illogical to do this and so would like to propose a merge. All those in favour please right your names below with a agree and althoughs against with a disagree The Quill (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears the merge has taken place without further discussion here. I wouldn't now advocate a de-merge but Dove and Galaxy are very different products culturally, even if they are physically identical. The fatty, sugary taste of US chocolate isn't very popular in Britain, and Galaxy is really the only example sold there (an attempt to market Hershey chocolate failed.) Galaxy is marketed exclusively to women as an 'indulgence' - the images taken from UK advertising in the article illustrate this marketing focus well. In America, Dove is a mainstream chocolate brand. --Ef80 (talk) 13:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The brands have different histories – Galaxy was introduced by Mars in 1958, Dove Candies & Ice Cream was acquired by Mars in 1985 and the chocolate was introduced in 1990 – and they also have different products, so the suggestion that Galaxy is a rebranded version of Dove chocolate is probably misleading. snigbrook (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Its convenient to have the link to the other Dove company on top like that, and I have no problem with it staying, but Im not sure there's a lot of actual *confusion* between the two.  You're never gonna go to the grocery store and come home with 8 bars of soap and say "Oh no! I bought the wrong kind of Dove bars!  I just saw the word Dove on the display and I got confused!" Amusing but not very probable.  If it stays it should just perhaps be a "see also" type of message.  —Soap— 01:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently some people do believe that they're related, whether because of a misconception that no two companies can share a brand name or for some other reason. —Soap— 01:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The hatnote

message: Isn't the sentence "Dove was introduced to the UK as Galaxy in 1960. In 1986, the company was acquired by Mars, Incorporated." incorrect? Galaxy has always been a Mars brand, so when Galaxy was introduced in the UK, it had no connection to Dove. Shouldn't it be "What is now known as Dove" or something along those lines, the current sentence implies that they were the same thing even back then. 147.147.53.149 (talk) 08:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect?
Talk:St Michael's College, Dublin

message: As someone with quite a bit of contact with the school, I have never come across these terms, could someone please back up the info. Sean keevey 23:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  School "Terms" 

message: The history section was lifted in its entirety from the Michaels school website - if someone has the time to rewrite this section in their own words, that would be great, if using the Michaels info it needs to be cited. Sorcha niri 14:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: Why does it keep getting deleted? Sean keevey 14:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Crest? 
Talk:Paul F. Lorence

message: I've updated the article and removed the relevant template.Phase4 22:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating article

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Belgian American Educational Foundation

message: Creation of article to provide basic information on science in Belgium. Pvosta 14:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Woodhouse railway station

message: Can I ask,what does this section mean?  It's really poorly written!
Woodhouse railway station serves the Woodhouse and Woodhouse Mill suburbs of Sheffield and the Parish of Orgreave in Rotherham, all of which are locoated in South Yorkshire, England. The station is 8 km (5¼ miles) east of Sheffield railway station on the Sheffield-Lincoln line. Because of its situation near to Woodhouse (East) Junction the station immediately eastwards was originally Kiveton Park, but following its opening in 1907 until its closure in 1955 it was Waleswood. Since 1955 the next station eastwards is Kiveton Bridge. To the west the next station is Darnall, and to the south  Beighton.
:I admit it's not the clearest of texts. I've edited Tudorminstrel's version which is hopefully more comprehensible. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 19:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah!  I understand.  It used to have east-, west- and south-bound lines!  Thanks Captain, much clearer now!
L.J.SkinnerWOT?|CONTRIBS 03:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem :) Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 08:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First Paragraph

message: I have once again unlinked Birley Branch and Orgreave colliery which are treated in the article itself. since a link would serve (at the present) to no more than redirecting to the present article, the links should be kept off. Furthermore, since notability issues exist, it would be more advantageous to explain at least the Birley Branch in the Woodhouse station article as we'd avoid creating a world or unexpandable stubs. Red linking is not condemnable, but in this cas eI believe it is in the best interest of clarity not to. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 11:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red link mayhem 

message: Captain Scarlet insists on removing the stn art lnk template to remove duplicate information (presumably the link to WDH on the Network Rail site). In order to try to prevent an edit war over this, I suggest a temporary solution - I've commented out the WDH link in the infobox and reinstated the stn art link as this also contains important information not shown elsewhere - namely the link to a map. Feel free to revert this after an alternative map link has been provided. Unfortunately the coords system doesn't recognise GBOS coordinates, so someone will have to do a conversion.– Tivedshambo (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate info
Talk:Bruce Wayne

message: Why  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.142.8.144 (talk) 00:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know but User:71.111.220.94 need to have his editing rights suspended, I'm not sure how to do that 96.3.139.41 (talk) 04:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of Danny Devito

message: There have been a lot of BWs so it's hard to think what the identifying picture should be (I wouldn't be averse to TAS, since we can ignore controversy about various comic book artists or movie actors). Perhaps it should be his most recent comic incarnation (the new black and yellow logo he will sport as head of Batman Incorporated) or perhaps it should be his most recent animated incarnation, which I think would either be guesting on Young Justice or if they're still making Brave and the Bold episodes. DB (talk) 07:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing picture
Talk:Integration law for immigrants to the Netherlands

message: The article is too personal. It is based on too many personal feelings, certainly POV. To help the case of immigrants in Holland, it is better to write the criticism in a NPOV manner with good references, --C6H12O6 14:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article voices popular criticisms and complaints that, if I remember it well, have also been voiced in Dutch media. I admit that the article may not be neutral, but I do not think it is based merely on personal feelings. Andries 06:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I have removed the term "assimilation" from the article, because I think it makes a POV caricature of the law. Please only re-insert the term with citations to reputable sources. I think the article makes a lot of criticism of the law, but it does not attempt to give an explanation of why this law came into existence. There are quite a lot of foreigners here who lived more than 10 years in the Netherlands, but cannot find a job, partially because they never bothered to learn Dutch. Andries 06:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I changed the title because I had overlooked that the law does not only apply to new immigrants. Andries (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I think the word "law" should be in the title. Andries (talk) 20:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording, style and neutrality 

message: Wow, this is an opinionated mess. I added a "More citations needed" tag... I sure hope it gets them. --tgeller (talk) 19:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I just went through and tried to add appropriate "Citation needed"s and such. But honestly, it's so bad that I'd recommend entirely deleting what's there. I'm not a regular WPian, so I'll leave that judgment to someone who is. --tgeller (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

text: More than two years have passed. It has been long past the time to delete the unsourced claims. Wikipedia should not contain large unsourced texts at all.92.63.48.182 (talk) 22:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section
Talk:Kitasato Shibasaburō

message: In the plague article it is claimed that Yersin was given credit for the discovery due to "confusing and contradictory" statements on the part of Kitasato, rather than greater dissemenation of the former's work. Which?--Timtak (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which is it?

message: If Kitasato didn't actually identify the Yersinia pestis bacillus, why is he recognized as a co-discoverer of the cause of the bubonic plague? howcheng  {chat} 19:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-discoverer 

message: This article here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%BCchner_flask
Mentions a Kitasato. Is this the same guy? If so, could the article here mention it and cross-reference?
I found somewhere on the www a reference to a "Kitasato" Filter, as opposed to the less granular Chamberland filter. IF it is this person then it should be mentioned perhaps, because in another article Kitasato is mentioned, as the above link shows (at the least in February 2021). But of course, right now I do not know if it is the same guy; if someone can verify it, then perhaps the article can mention it and cross-reference onto that filter. I do not know how many famous Kitasato's exist though. 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:C080:419D:679D:C9F8 (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanical Filter
Talk:Popstars Live

message: I propose to merge the Kayne Taylor article into the Popstars Live article as Taylor has released no material since his debut single and is no longer signed to Universal records. There has been no sign of public activity since the end of the show. If anyone objects to this and wants the article kept as it is, i will leave the discussion open for 5 days before making the changesPeter20120 (24 November 2006)
- Don't. Many singers who have not even got a record deal have Wikipedia. Murphy and Taylor were at the finals of a major television competition, and Taylor had a Top 10 hit. This is surely credible to have their own article?
Miranda is working as a session vocalist for upcoming recording artists. Miranda is also working on tracks for a new independent label and is performing regulary with Sydney's Top Corporate band "The Smooth Groove" with her long time Music Director J'aime Gibson220.101.108.10 10:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to merge articles