Talk:Titan

message: We currently have a non-standard disambiguation here, with Titan redirecting to Titan (mythology). We should either have the disambig at Titan, or make Titan (mythology) the primary topic by moving it to Titan. I suspect there will be far more people looking for the moon at present and for the forseeable future due to its prominence in the news. I'm in favour of equal disambiguation but it needs an admin to move Titan (disambiguation) to Titan. — Trilobite (Talk) 13:22, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is odd that Titan is a redirect to a disambiguated page (currently the moon) rather than being either a disambiguation page itself or a non-redirected page.  I second moving this page to Titan, as no single primary topic stands out.  A-giau 00:19, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the case someone has changed the redir at Titan since I posted my original message. This has made even more of a mess. I wish those who hold the privilege of being admins would actually be of some use. The disambiguation page needs moving to Titan. I will do it using copy and paste if no admin can be bothered. — Trilobite (Talk) 09:52, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Early talk

message: Titian is also the name of another game not listed, how can i create a new page for this game when there already is one that is named exactly the same? I added it at the bottom of the list under "Gaming", but with no link, obviously.
:: Best thing to do is find out when it was released and then make a page called Titan (2002 computer game) or whatever. The Singing Badger 14:08, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Titan is also the name of another game not listed.

message: There is no page on Wikipedia about the giant longhorn beetle the Titan beetle, which is
surprising.
It's (apparently) the largest beetle in the world, and can cut through human flesh with its
mandibles(!)
I added a link from this page.
Here are a few articles about it in case someone wants to write about it:
*http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/po/news/2004-05/feb/24a.shtml
*http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/4297025.stm
Richard W.M. Jones 19:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Titan beetle]] 

message: To the best of my knowledge, Uranus is never called "Titan", and is not in fact classed among the Titans.  The one of the Titans who is commonly referred to as "Titan" is Helios, the Sun-god. I am changing the disambig to reflect this. RandomCritic 01:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uranus/Titan 

message: Titan is a moon of Saturn right? It says the in brackets so its not sattilite technically. Stabby Joe 01:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Moon? 

message: I noticed that EJF has added Titan, Afghanistan to the list recently. I don't know if the place really exist or it is just a hoax but if it does, please put a link to the article or at least to the article of the province it is located in.--Remitonova (talk) 08:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afghan place? 

message: I think it makes sense to have the moon and myth articles as they are at the top.  Someone recently added the moon also in the Science section.  I think this also makes sense as well since someone used to "standard" dab pages might miss the items at the top - and for consistency I have made sure the Myth item is in two places as well.  (also restored the Helios articles as he is called Titan as well). (John User:Jwy talk) 23:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dups 

message: Add the storm? Barry.carter (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winter Storm Titan? 

message: What is clearer as a seprate category?  I did find it confusing that vehicles are no part of technology. That was the reason why I didn't find what I was looking for. --Der-Wir-Ing (talk) 10:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edit created a number of problems. First, you accidentally removed all the entries under "Natural sciences". Second, "Transportation" as a subject area can encompass entries that are not technologies, like TITAN Salvage, which is a company, not a technology. Third, there should never be a subject-area section below "Other uses", like you did with "Sports teams". Per MOS:DAB and WP:LONGDAB, the only section after "Other uses" should be "See also". For readers expecting to find vehicles under technology, there is a hatnote at the very top of that section to direct you. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 15:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology