lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Car colour popularity

message: I don't know if anyone would be interested but it seems like it would be easy to put out a global poll on the internet and get proper data for more than one country, it's something that could be done with a google form, or survey monkey, or many other services. I'm not sure how reliable the data would be or how useful that data actually is, but I much prefer having more data than less. --Zenware (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Run the Survey 

message: I don't believe that car colour popularity has anything to do with automotive design, the issue is one of consumer choice and fashion, not one of design. In the interests of de-orphaning the article how about merging it with fashion or fads and trends? Dino246 15:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about merging it with car classification? Jay (talk) 03:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with Automotive Design 

message: Given that the info is only for one year and one country and the referenced webpage is no longer available should this article be deleted? --User:Boreas74 Talk 16:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd certainly vote to delete it.Dino246 (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valid Article? 

message: Similar to the above section, I put a citations needed template and it was reverted - Any good reason why? There are paragraphs and paragraphs of wild and reckless claims (as far as car colour popularity can be reckless) that are lacking any reference in the linked citations, or at least mad claims cited by only one opinionated article. Am I wrong in this view? --Sgtlion (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Citations? 
Talk:Juddmonte

message: ...that Prince Khalid Abdullah of Saudi Arabia was the first Arab racing owner to win the 200-year old Two Thousand Guineas race with his Juddmonte Farms stallions? • Lawrence Cohen 15:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible DYK upon expansion 

message: and  have usernames and editing patterns which strongly suggest a conflict of interest and likely paid-editing.  The 2nd listed account is blocked.  The first one should read the two links in the previous sentence before making any further edits to Wikipedia.  In particular, the editor should not edit this article directly, but instead use the  template to request edits here on this talk page.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editors with a conflict of interest 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Andrewa (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Juddmonte Farms →  – Juddmonte is the name by which the company is commonly known - see https://juddmonte.com/ or https://britishchampionsseries.com/fixtures/juddmonte-international-stakes/ or https://www.racingpost.com/bloodstock/juddmonte-unveils-exciting-mating-plans-for-blue-blooded-broodmare-band/468764. 195.70.65.199 (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I have corrected the poorly written lead, and updated the information about Arrogate.  I’m afraid that it’s very difficult to understand what you’re requesting regarding Mirage Dancer. The same applies to all the subsequent details, which use names that few editors are probably familiar with.  I suggest you submit a new request in a very clear format, with specific locations for the added phrases and exact wording to be used.  When nomenclature is involved, it’s very easy to get it wrong. Ferkijel (talk) 08:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 March 2021
Talk:Pile

message: Hi, I believe a "Pile" (plural Piles?) is a "Pathological Haemorroid" rather than just a "Haemorroid".
This is clearly stated in the "Haemorroid" article.
In other words, a "Pile" is an element of the set of "Pathological Haemorroids", which is itself a proper subset of the set of "All Haemorroids".
Therefore "Pile" is a separate concept from "Heamorroid" itself, so it should have it's own article and n ot be used just as a disambiguation.
IMHO, there is a missing brick of the Wikipedia edifice / conceptual hierarchy here.
Also, if we can have "Piles" and "Haemorroids" then we can surely have "Pile" and "Haemorroid"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjalexand (talk • contribs) 13:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2007-10-10

message: Any chance you guys can review the Patrick van Aanholt submission? Has been nearly a week now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.158.3.3 (talk) 16:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. See my comment there. Melsaran (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Henry Nott

message: This is just a stub. Most of the content comes from online biographical sources but does not constitute plagiarism.Brian0324 16:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Created a new version at Talk:Henry Nott/Temp. Please review. This is still only a stub. Wikipedia still allows stubs, right?Brian0324 16:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've recreated the page Henry Nott since bots don't do that kind of thing.Brian0324 21:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  new version
Talk:Doomwyte

message: the reason I put hangon is because I have a reliable source for this.
I can prove this comes froma a reliable source too
I know its not much but its all the info I have right now X.X  --Poodleman 17:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hangon notice

message: This entire article was lifted word-for-word from the Redwall Wiki. --79.76.245.174 23:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content

message: Hope you don't mind, but I just rewrote the synopsis. Hope it's a little more thorough! Ork Rule (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification to synopsis
Talk:End Water Poverty

message: I have removed the main content of the page as well as COI/neutrality/advertisment tags as a temporary measure while I read through the COI/neutral POV guidelines. Isabellam 16:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Thelarche

message: What I came here to say was:  etymology?  Wpell (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyway

message: I'm willing to allow someone to upload one of my images of Thelarche.  (I'm not autoconfirmed, so apparently I can't upload the image myself.) TeacherInItaly (talk) 06:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I've been doing research to reconstruct this page, add additional pertinent information with references, and added a couple photos. Feel free to give feedback once I have posted my new version of the article.
ElizahBecker (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconstruction of this page
Talk:Absolutely Fabulous (2001 film)

message: The lede lists Gabriel Aghion as the film's writer while the info-box includes 5 additional names, including French and Saunders. Why is there a discrepancy? Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to IMDb, the writing credits include Jennifer Saunders and Dawn French as creators of the series; Gabriel Aghion, François-Olivier Rousseau, and Rémi Waterhouse for scenario and adaptation; and Aghion, Rousseau, Waterhouse, and Pierre Palmade for dialogue.  Someone might have already noted your concern, as the lead currently and correctly states that it was "co-written" by Aghion. 2601:3CA:204:F860:4DEB:52C8:7CB0:F598 (talk) 23:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer/s.
Talk:Bench trial

message: Could someone clarify whether the term 'bench trial' applies to civil actions as well as criminal ones?  What is the relationship of this term to the term 'cause', which refers to a civil action without a jury here in Victoria? - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal vs Civil Actions 

message: "Without the time consuming showmanship of a jury trial, the parties are often able to concentrate on the real questions at issue."
Can we find a more encylopedic way of saying this? Or is this from another source? If so please cite it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV sentence 
Talk:Strickland v. Washington

message: According to Florida DOC, he was executed July 13, 1984, not July 14, 1984 as stated in the article. http://www.dc.state.fl.us/ci/execlist.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.146.216 (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Subsequent Events Section, the execution date is wrong
Talk:Gopal Chandra Bhattacharya

message: Contrary to the pompous description of his "magnum opus", Banglar Kit-Patanga (1975), is there any concrete evidence (via citations) that Bhattacharya's work advanced the academic disciplines of Myrmecology and Entomology? In what way is the book comparable to, say, The Ants (1990), by Bert Hölldobler and E. O. Wilson? Solomon7968 13:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnum opus 
Talk:Weird Dreams

message: I added a link to the novella, which is hosted (with the author's permission) at http://www.geocities.com/jeremyalansmith/level9/wdreams.htm The link was removed automatically because it's on Geocities, but I don't believe that it otherwise contravenes guidelines - and does add to the usefulness of the entry 62.108.137.10 (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed "giant roast chicken with mouth" to "disembodied lower jaw (human; with mouth set in where the "chin" would be)". predcon (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not exactly up for interpretation 

message: It doesn't seem accurate that the DOS version was actually released within 1988 as the first version of the game, especially when all evidence I can find points to the novella being copyrighted 1989. (Does the DOS version use the novella for copy protection?)
I don't think we consider MobyGames to be a reliable source. This needs some expert investigation.
(The article is also a bit over-wikified, but that's a topic for a separate discussion.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 22:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: with citation from Computer and Video Games magazine (not by me) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 05:28, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOS release year 

message: From my understanding of the novella, Emily is an incarnation of Zelloripus, not (as the plot section currently claims) a separate person possessed by Zelloripus. Does any version of the game contain an instruction manual which says otherwise?
What needs to be done to satisfy our reliable-sourcing requirements? (None of the websites I can find which currently have a functioning copy of the novella seem to be official.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 00:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Emily is an incarnation, a forced punishment for past crimes. From the novella, Chapter 1: ″So mere bad timing could explain Steve's unhappy encounter with Zelloripus, or Emily as she should be called, on this day in particular." 2600:1700:28A0:DDE0:8137:7527:D3DC:561A (talk) 21:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emily and Zelloripus 

message: I have some memory of playing this at the time, but didn't remember it as a platform game. I looked up some gameplay videos, and it seems more like an adventure game with action elements. The character constantly remains on one visual plane, doesn't jump to higher or lower surfaces. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platformer?
Talk:Action fiction

message: Sections 1 and 2 should be developed as separate articles, one for the mode and one for the genre.
: * ? one of Action mode, Action (mode), Action (literary mode), Action (rhetorical mode)
: * either  or 
: --P64 (talk) 19:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be a disambiguation page or it should redirect to a fiction  within Action (disambiguation) --the latter if i understand correctly. Either way, the stub Action (literature) should be a third disambiguant. --P64 (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This article seemed to be confusing "action" with a type of genre fiction, called "action fiction". I have tried to re-focus it, but suggest that a merge with genre fiction is appropriate. Rwood128 (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the material about the literary mode, action, to a new article, Action (narrative), and linked to it from the Action disambiguation page.  Both articles need more material and sources, but I think this is a good start.—Anita5192 (talk) 19:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split and disambiguate
Talk:Contractibility of unit sphere in Hilbert space

message: The statement ``Since Sk is compact, so is its image under ³. Hence the image is contained in some n-dimensional subspace of H. in the first proof is FALSE!!!!  I think the unit sphere in Hilbert space may not be homeomorphic to a CW-complex, in which case this proof cannot be salvaged.  Whitehead's theorem does NOT apply.71.111.220.102 (talk) 01:26, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces are not CW-complexes (at least, not as an inductive limit over finite-dimensional subspaces), pretty much exactly for the reason you give.  Consider the Hilbert space ℓ2 from the Hilbert space article.  Now consider the sequence z_n = 1/n, this is in ℓ2, and consider the subset of ℓ2 that consists of all sequences which agree with z_n for the first k terms, and the remaining terms are zero.  This is a bounded countable set, so its closure is compact (with limit point the sequence z_n).  But the closure isn't contained in a finite-dimensional subspace of ℓ2 since it contains a countable-infinite linearly independant set.  Normalize these vectors if you want everything to be in the unit sphere.  Rybu (talk) 06:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The comment beginning with "Nope, infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces are not CW-complexes" may be correct in its conclusion, but this comment is not a proof of that fact. (The comment shows only that a certain countable subset of ℓ2 does not lie in a finite-dimensional subspace.)2600:1700:E1C0:F340:F498:2C87:73A6:6C70 (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ''topological argument'' is wrong
Talk:Jericho (disambiguation)

message: Why is Jericho in the United States not included in Jericho in places?  The United States is still made up of places.  Is there a reason for the separation?  George C 17:23, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A change has been made, but it still doesn't answer my question as to why the USA deserves to be separated from the rest of the world in a list of places.  George C 16:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Off-hand, I'd guess it is to avoid listing "United States" repeatedly. The other nations only have one "Jericho" each. --Ckatzchatspy 17:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Places as opposed to United States?

message: Fair to midland has released a song named "Walls of Jericho". Should it be added to the list? 85.5.151.209 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See WP:DABNOT--Jerzy•t 07:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walls of Jericho 

message: [Friendlier formatting is pending]
   The following are removed per WP:DabRL, which discusses what needs to happen for a Dab entry to be made out of them.
   But note that the notation, under US, reading
:these cities do not yet have articles, or do not have enough other articles linking to them.
misstates the principle cited above. There must one link to the missing article, and there must also be another articles with, as i would put it, enuf info about the topic (the place, in this case) to make it worth a user following the link to read that info. (In the case of Lambton Shores, IMO the mere mention of Jericho, Ontario in a list is suitable to a hierarchical table of provinces and their hierarchies of subdivisions, but does not amount to information worth consulting an encyclopedia to get: if that suffices for the user's need, they shouldn't waste their time navigating an encyclopedia to get it.)
;Armenia
*Jericho, Armenia, in Janvon
*Jericho Province, in Janvon
;Australia
*Jericho, New South Wales
;Canada
*Jericho, New Brunswick, a village near Moncton
*Jericho, Ontario (see Lambton Shores)
;France
*Jericho, France, a city near Paris
**Jericho-Maldves-Saint-Joseph
**Jericho-Rivdes
;United Kingdom
*Jericho, Greater Manchester, England
*Jericho, Cardiff, Wales
;United States
< !--these cities do not yet have articles, or do not have enough other articles linking to them.
*Jericho, Alabama
*Jericho, Connecticut
*Jericho, Kentucky
*Jericho, Louisiana
*Jericho, Mississippi
*Jericho, Missouri
*Jericho, New Hampshire
*Jericho, New Jersey
*Jericho, Ohio
*Jericho, Pennsylvania
*Jericho, South Carolina
*Jericho, Texas
*Jericho, Washington -->
;Other nations
*Jericho, Algeria, a district of Algiers
*Jericho, Austria
*Jericho, Barbados
*Jericho, Israel, a town near Bados, Irsael
*Jericho, Netherlands
*Jericho, New Zealand
*Jericho, Free State, South Africa
*Jericho, Syria
*Jerichoa, Norway, also spelled Jericho
--Jerzy•t 07:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed entries
Talk:E-2 visa

message: The US immigration has approved E2 applicants with lower investments: From $35,000 - $100,000 - in several cases. I dont see where the $200,000 number is coming from, as the referenced link is not working either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariekehensel (talk • contribs) 18:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Investment requirements

message: I removed "All male nonimmigrant visa applicants between the ages of 16 and 45, regardless of nationality and regardless of where they apply, must complete and submit a form DS-157 in addition to the Nonimmigrant Visa Application (DS-156E)." It's not the case, see  http://www.us-immigration.com/us-immigration-news/us-visas/learn-about-form-ds157-for-supplemental-nonimmigrant-visa/ where it says "However, US consulates and applicants who use the online nonimmigrant visa form (Form DS-160) do not need to file USCIS Form DS-157. Form DS-160 uses many of the same questions as the Supplemental Nonimmigrant Visa Application Form.".
05:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requirement for DS-157
Talk:Group C (Australia)

message: There was a recent edit where a sentence describing Group C as having a thin veneer was deleted citing: "Small engined cars were only uncompetitive in the outright sense. Group C wasn't just 1 class." I restored the sentence and respond to that, when several rounds of the Australian touring car championship in 1980 and 1981 had less than 12 cars I would like to believe the comment is still valid as when you split it into classes you have three or four cars per class that it constitutes a 'thin veneer'. --Falcadore (talk) 12:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Class structure

message: The hodge-podge additions to the article in the name of technical accuracy since the first major re-write has lost its tightness and the piece needs to be re-written again. Not blaming any editors in isolation, just stating that looked at now without having seen the article previously the writing feels bloated and stat-heavy. --Falcadore (talk) 02:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Culture of North Africa

message: — Assignment last updated by Wildcat2026 (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIT 398 Intercultural International Communication
Talk:Physisorption

message: Britannica DOES NOT have an entry for such a word. I myself have never heard of "physisorption" or "physical adsorption" -- this is an unnecessary linguistic invention -- please consider transferring all the material present here under the "ADSORPTION" wiki-entry  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waldemahr (talk • contribs) 02:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, Waldemahr, just about anyone with knowledge of physical chemistry should be familiar with the word physisorption, and it's distinct cousin chemisorption.  It might not be in Britannica, but it is in OED. 121.45.201.66 (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Reconsider 

message: Who had the stupid idea to use energy in eV? 99% of the world uses kJ/mol ¬¬
~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.2.237.16 (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy units
Talk:International School (Bellevue, Washington)

message: I have added the article neutrality dispute and quality cleanup because much of this article seems like an advertisement and cites few sources--DerRichter 17:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Does anyone have citations for the information in these sections?  It would be really helpful to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DerRichter (talk • contribs) 18:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed a lot from this page that was irrelevant, not encyclopedic, and uncited.  I did, however, try to find sources for many claims.  I also left the curriculum section becuase it might be important, but people really need to cite their sources.  A lot of what I deleted were sentences stating "students are unhappy with this..." but no citation.  It would be great to add more to this article if you have the proper means of doing so. This may help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools#Structure--DerRichter (talk) 11:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History, grading
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Sm565

message: Note that the user has been indefinitely blocked. See . JoshuaZ 18:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So is this RfC relevant?  Or should we continue since they might appeal?  OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Continue since they might appeal. Wikidudeman (talk) 19:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I recommend that you let this go. A read of his talk page shows that he's burned through an awful lot of good will awfully fast; while there is a small possibility of that he might be unblocked, the chance that any of us might win over $100 million from the Powerball is many times larger. Lastly, at best continuing this will just waste your time; at worst it might just encourage him to return to Wikipedia to stir up trouble. -- llywrch 21:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Considering that he was blocked over seven hours ago, & has yet to request an unblock, I'd say wait another 12-18 hours. If he doesn't request an unblock within 24 hours, he probably won't ever do that -- although he may resort to sockpuppetry. If he starts using sockpuppets, then there is no longer a need for this RfC: he will have proved that he should  be banned. -- llywrch 01:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't see this coming He's requesting to be unblocked! Wikidudeman (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  All the more reason to drop the matter as moot. -- llywrch 20:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indefinitely block
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Timeline Tracer/unrelated talk

message: Please be adviced that an editor is trying to omplicate the name of this project at an edit war happening at Homeopathy ☤'ProfBrumby 12:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have left an alert to the editor in question. Please avoid to associate for participating in edit wars, that is against policy. Please feel free to review and support the editing of any other editor, member or not of this project but avoid to provide excuses to those type of editors looking for POV,  thank you Daoken 13:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeopathy
Talk:A Reckless Romeo

message: Something about the place it was found might be helpful? It was rediscovered in Norway in 1998 at the Norwegian Film Institute  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.113.66.145 (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for this? Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rediscovery