lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Salt dome

message: i removed the "unsourced" tag.  could you please provide some examples of statements in the article that are in need of sourcing?  (to me, the article seems largely descriptive and uncontroversial.)  thanks.  Lunch 02:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "unsourced" tag 

message: This article NEEDS to be corrected by a geologist. No kidding, it's a mess, with many wrong sentences... Geojide 15:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: could you elaborate on at least some of the "many wrong sentences"?  what's wrong with them?  what's a good source (book, journal, or whatnot) to use?  thanks.  Lunch 18:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For instance, the "prehistoric times", or the depositions within seas. I don't speak a good enough english to correct. Geojide 05:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  is there a geologist aroud there ? 

message: I removed the link because it lead to a spam page - it appears the old page expired and was bought out by a spammer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youbetterwork (talk • contribs) 17:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed a link 

message: I propose changing the title to "Salt diapir" so that it includes the full spectrum of halokinetic structures: columnar forms (domes), salt walls, salt canopies, etc. Rygel, M.C. (talk) 12:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: The link in the ninth reference as well as the first link in the fourth citation do not work. The link in the eighth reference leads to the overall website for the Encyclopedia for Earth and not the specific entry referenced. In addition, throughout the article, there are multiple red links to Wikipedia pages that do not exist. There are also multiple portions of this article with missing citations.  Suhacker256 (talk) 03:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to add that I plan to address these issues. I'm currently a student working on this article for a class. Suhacker256 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 18:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with sources and links
Talk:Sensormatic

message: In this revision, the section Sensormatic is a Leader in CCTV Technology (in particular the heading) sounds like a commercial ad. Furthermore, the rest of the article is low quality, and bulleted numbered lists ("* 1. Ultra Post...") are just plain wrong (they shouldn't be numbered anyway). I'm not sure how to best fix it and certainly am not an expert on Sensormatic. --Elektron 02:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: As in, there are none here.  Broader topics such as loss prevention show Sensormatic tags, why not here?  And the flimsy adhesive plastic ones aren't the only thing they make.  The gator tags, etc. would also be cool to see. --DigitalGadget 18:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Hello, 
This page has outdated information that should be updated. I do not want to update this page myself, as it may be considered a conflict of interest, but it's important that correct information be shared. Also, this page doesn't accurately depict what Sensormatic is and it would nice to have this page expanded. There is information on sensormatic.com as well as www.tycoretailsolutions.com. 
Here are some instances on what is currently posted: 
Sensormatic is frequently called by the name of its parent company ADT, formerly ADT/Tyco. 
Sensormatic is a Tyco brand and not associated with ADT in North America. Sensormatic is a brand name applied to acoutso-magentic (AM) electronic article surveillance (EAS) and Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) products. It is not a company. 
The Sensormatic Supertag is a widely used hard loss prevention tag. The Supertag took over for the Sensormatic Ultragator tag. Ultragator is the tan Ultra Max tag that can be found in many retail stores. Ultragator tags were improved upon during the design of the Supertag.
There are so many more anti-theft products that Sensormatic offers. The Ultra Gator tag is still available and was not replaced by the SuperTag, although the SuperTag is the highest security tag that's offered.
I'm hoping I can get some guidance on how to have this page updated without conflict of interest. Please advise. 
Thank you!
Kborrellitrs (talk) 13:28, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information on this page
Talk:Prescott, Oregon

message: To the best of my knowledge, Prescott has not had a post office in my lifetime. Does anyone know or have a reference to when its post office was closed? 66.234.222.23 (talk) 04:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Katr67 (talk) 00:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Office
Wikipedia talk:Administrator recall

message: I've marked this proposal as rejected, just like the other one, though my arguments for doing so here are not quite as strong. anyway, due to the fact that it often produces more heat than light. 
Unfortunately this exact approach has never been tried, so I can't say with 100% certainty how it'll behave. I can only infer from similar processes, which didn't really work out. 
Kim Bruning 09:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. It seemed as though this was going in circles. I think several recent desysoppings might help convince people that the current system works at least okay. Grandmasterka 05:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Aye, I don't think ti was a bad move per se just a bit previous.  A pause to reflect is good, and an archive of the talk (with summerization) is forthcoming, but "rejected" was too strong. - brenneman {L} 02:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rejected 

message: There's a ton of material in the three archives.  While I'm going to summarise it all, that might take time.  In the interim, please re-read all three archives if you intend to comment.  This is a contentious issue that has been plauged with a great deal of repetative discussion, which has greatly hindered consensus gathering, including consensus to reject. - brenneman {L} 03:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steady on 

message: I think there needs to be at least five signatures to start an admin recall
petition. It should be demonstrated the admin has engaged in unprofessional conduct such as harassing editors, arbitrarily enforcing the rules/guidelines (meaning they expect others to follow the rules but not themselves), harshness with newcomers and partisanship. 
All of these undermine Wikipedia's image.--Pravknight 04:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Admin recall suggestion
Talk:Tarax

message: Anyone who knows about this know about Frosty Soft Drinks PTY LTD??? or Frosty cola? Produced in the old steel tin cans before aluminium??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.139.131.126 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Category talk:American Christians

message: What are the criteria for inclusion in this category? In the US, a person must claim to be a Christian or Jew for any hope of social advancement, save academia, and to achieve elective office.--Son of Somebody 00:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What are the criteria for inclusion in this category?

message: Aren't 80-90% of Americans (historically and currently) Christians? Almost any American could be on this list. The subcategories (American Roman Catholics, or for that matter Baptists, Methodists, Mormons, etc.) seem more useful. TK421 15:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its actually more like 75%, but I agree. This category is not useful. Titanium Dragon 05:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SHould this go to CfD then? It's too large, too generic. If it were something like 'Christian Actors' and referred to those who make note of their religion in their work and interviews, then we could put Kirk Cameron, some of te 7th Heaven folks, that guy from grey's anatomy, and so on in, and it might be legit. ThuranX 04:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This shouldn't go to CfD, it was there very recently and it was decided to keep this category. Mathmo Talk 04:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: About 90% of these people are Atheists who call themselves Christians so they can be on this list. Can someone prove me wrong?--Son of Somebody 17:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: About 99% of these people, even if they have heard of Wikipedia, are not aware that this category exists, far less that they are on it. Your assertion seems rather odd. --Orange Mike 18:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My assertion was nearly as serious as this category's context. My apology for the facetious entry.--74.171.63.241 19:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It's possible that might help matters, but I doubt it, because then you'll end up with subcategories like American Christian bisexual Republican actresses. That will go on a while until it becomes just too much, and then someone will suggest deleting all the subcategories and just having :Category:American_Christians. My two cents is that the category should be deleted. Ward3001 (talk) 22:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the point of this category?

message: Another reason this category should be killed outright is that it is rife with selectivity. For example, Watergate Felon Charles Colson (later radio "evangelist") is not included. Nor is the founder of the reborn Ku Klux Klan William Joseph Simmons, who was a teacher in a Methodist Episcopal Church. Nor any of the priests involved in the Church pedophilia scandal (including the bishops and cardinals who hushed it up). Were these people not Christians? Or does this list only include "good" Christians? And who decides? AnthroMimus (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rife with POV selectivity
Template talk:Olympic champions 4 × 400 metres men

message: Would anyone mind if I replace this template with a compressed version.  See, for example, the difference between Template:Places_in_Bedfordshire and this version.  The idea is that on a given athlete's page, the template would show the other members of the relay team with links to a page for a member of the previous and next couple of gold medal teams.  For example, from Ray Armstead's page (or any other member of the 1984 gold medal team) the template might look like:
Olympic champions in men's 4x400 m relay
1980 | 1984 United States Sunder Nix, Ray Armstead, Alonzo Babers, Antonio McKay | 1988 | 1992 >>
with the reference in the source looking like
:
I don't think maintenance of such a template would not be particularly more difficult than maintenance of the existing template. Comments?  -- Rick Block (talk) 03:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the template and all the references (added the year).  -- Rick Block (talk) 03:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection at all. The scroll bar version is much more navigable and should find lots of other applications.  -hydnjo talk 18:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Compressing this template

message: The template was recently converted to the generic navbox template.  I don't really care that much, but I prefer either the previous scrollable navigation bar or something like the current version of Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Men.  Any other opinions on this? -- Rick Block (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  template format 

message: In the Sydney Olympics, Nigeria didn't win the gold. The US did. The Hemogoblin (talk) 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you see this link above? http://www2.iaaf.org/OLY00/results/data/M/4X4/Rf.html David D. (Talk) 06:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nigeria?
Talk:Superman's Metropolis

message: I have proposed splitting the sequels off into their own sections. JMLofficier has provided more than enough information for each mini-series and they'd all be solid entries on their own. I'd be happy to do the splitting. (Emperor 18:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for sourcing it - I should have spotted it when I was nosing around but missed it. You are right about the linking and I'll go back through the "what links here" and double check (although it'd be worth other people double checking). Also thanks for the addition of the ISBNs for the trades. I just couldn't find them (if no collected volumes then a reprint would be nice - if DC are reading this) and I added the Wonder Woman one in too but the ISBN recognition system doesn't seem to like it (it happens occasionally - not sure why). (Emperor 14:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The split has been done and this has allowed me to add in other categories for the specific main character. Also note I have used pipes to get the character list more in line with the names of the charcaters in the story (although linking through to the entries on the main character they are based on) as this seems to have caused confusion (see the section above and a number of other edits) - this will need more of an edit I suspect. In an hour or so I'll go through and make sure the incoming links are all pointing to the right entries (I'll adjust List of Elseworlds publications now though as that seems the main one). (Emperor 18:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?
Talk:The Amazing Mrs Pritchard

message: The following was (rightfully) removed from the article, but can someone who knows do a paragraph about how it was recieved?
"but was widely perceived as a critical and ratings disaster. By the end of the shows run it was attracting only three million viewers, a disaster for a mainstream BBC drama. The BBC have confirmed that a proposed second series will not be made." Amo 14:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I collected some quotes about the show after it's first airing. Dunno about ratings, though. Check Media Guardian? I heard they said that it would return ove the end credits, but I imagine they say that about everything. HornetMike 15:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception

message: Seeing as the BBC shows no indication it will re-comission the series, and thus there's little room for expansion I suggest Ros Pritchard, Catherine Walker and Hilary Rees-Benson be merged into the main article, with a lengthier characters section created.  HornetMike 14:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Go for it. Amo 16:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Created the characters page, but it needs more content. Seeing as I watched little of the show, someone else may need to do that. HornetMike 20:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of character articles

message: I emailed the BBC and asked if another series was being made, or going to be made. They said that it hadn't been decided.
St91 17:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another series?

message: If you are a Mrs Pritchard fan, add the userbox! 
Enjoy... Billbert12 (talk) 02:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox
Talk:Zomg

message: "OMG" and "ZOMG" are both mentioned in Oh my god!, and I don't think Zomg really needs an entire page dedicated to itself. --BLuToRsE 03:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please redirect to Oh My God. Thanks. --- RockMFR 22:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Harryboyles 03:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Double redirect

message: I think List of Internet slang phrases#Z would be a better target for this redirect than Oh My God, since it actually defines the term. DopefishJustin 05:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I added a template. TheBlazikenMaster 10:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better redirect? 

message: Just wanted to say that this is, as of 'Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:20 pm', the name of the game codenamed Gaia Battle. The post here proves that what I am saying is true. Being so, maybe you should put a link to the page Gaia Battle at Wikipedia.
:81.84.64.96 (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The wikipedia entry is zOMG!. I suggest a redirect to ZOMG instead of the search or wiktionary article. Gmfreak (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  zOMG 

message: zomg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.14.127.148 (talk) 17:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  zomg 

message: This page point the gentle reader to Wictionary, while ZOMG redirects to SMS language#Common abbreviations. Which is the better target? Totnesmartin (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  proper target? 

message: :Spam removed.  The complete request and Jac16888's denial of it can be found here in the edit history. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done, the above is highly promotional and does not demonstrate notability--Jac16888 Talk 12:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Yihaa5, 22 July 2011 

message: Add 
Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 8 December 2015 

message: Remove the space before  and remove the two blank lines below it.  The blank lines are harmless but the space is causing a visual artifact at the top of the body of the page.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done BethNaught (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixup a recent edit
Talk:The Mother of Us All

message: Adding synopsis, cast list, reference. Plan to add info on the genesis of the opera, expand on description of libretto and music. Herbivore 03:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Thought the following was a useful add, but will leave it to the workgroups:
;In popular culture
Julian Ochrymowych is a  member of the National Puzzlers' League under the nom Jo the Loiterer.
JJB 19:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:Glen Donnelly

message: The family tree here might look better if expressed via Template:Familytree.  --0x845FED 03:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Comic book covers

message: The text of this category refers to  and , both of which were superceded by  in April 2007. I'm trying to think of how to address this, but I'm drawing a blank at the moment. If someone else wants to take a crack at it, go for it. --GentlemanGhost 18:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old templates
Talk:Erbolat Dosaev

message: Please would an interested editor assess the independent draft at User:Israelbenjamin/sandbox, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 14:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft
Talk:Harp guitar

message: I have to question the listing of every guitarist who happens to have picked up a harp guitar for one tine here or there as a "notable harp guitarist."  
Jimmy Page?
Robbie Robertson?
I guess the question is, does this section intend to list musicians who are primarily notable for their work on harp guitar?  Or simply anyone who's ever picked up or recorded a tune with a harp guitar, and who happens to be notable for -any other reason-?
Also, there is a link to John Doan, who certainly -is- a notable harp guitarist, but his page seems to have been deleted for reasons not entirely clear.  Either the page needs to come back, or the link shouldn't be a link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.174.105 (talk) 00:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: All good questions.  I have flagged this section as original research.  Like all similar lists in other articles, there is no clear criteria for what makes a person "notable" enough to be included.  So all we are left with is a list of people who may (or may not) have played the harp guitar at one time.   --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable "Harp Guitarists"

message: This page links incorrectly to the wrong Stephen Bennett. This is the correct Stephen Bennett's website: http://harpguitar.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.117.250.107 (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Stephen Bennett 
Talk:Sue Jones-Davies

message: Something is sort of fishy here in the statement: There was an "urban myth" that the town had banned the film and prohibited it for nearly 30 years, but this was false.[7][8] It later emerged that the film had never been banned in the town.[9] [emphasis mine]. For a start:
#Citation [7] and [8], BBC and National Public Radio respective, do not say a word about the myth. On the contrary, they mention the upcoming lifting of the ban with the screening of Life of Brian. This is a deliberate faulty use of reference.
#Citation [9] is a defunct BBS Wales site, and is available in an archive here, and I find it quite unimpressive. For one, there is no other verifiable source that mentions Rory Hogan's important discovery that the film was shown in 1981. Even with eyewitness account in the comment, this alone does not preclude that it was not banned afterwards, taking Hogan's claim at face value, i.e., for almost 30 years up to 2009. It simply is not supported by a single shred of secondary evidence.
I think it can be resolved by only Aberystwith people with verifiable source, if any. Until then I am putting the text as what all the available sources unanimously say, that it was truly banned. Chhandama (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is alleged myth a conspiracy? 
Talk:Branham High School

message: Added the note about Branham's API increase and about becoming a distinguished school but I'm a student - if someone would like to go out of their way and add references to the academic section it would be awesome. Zeratul547 17:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Pyramid Rock Festival

message: Added this years announced line-up. More to come of course. Shaybear♥  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Lineup

message: Talk amongst the camp sites of those attending the festival this year were that a person allegedly overdosed and a girl had been raped on Sunday night. Can't find a source for this.
Also of note was the intense smell of sewerage permeating the stage area and camp sites nearby.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.232.236 (talk) 10:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007