Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Syriac Christianity work group

message: ===Conversion to task force?===
If anybody is intrested in this project at all, I'd like to recommend that this inactive project be converted to a task force of WikiProject Christianity.  This would help by providing the relevant infrastructure, and letting any intrested editors get on with fixing the articles. 
If I don't hear from anybody about this soon, I may boldly convert it myself. -- SECisek 14:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - I think the scope of the work group should be specifically reduced to only those articles which directly deal with Christianity, though, rather than the current scope which includes several articles not directly related to Christianity. John Carter 16:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: All tags converted to task format. -- SECisek (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anbody here?

message: If anybody is intrested in this project at all, I'd like to recommend that this inactive project be converted to a task force of WikiProject Christianity.  This would help by providing the relevant infrastructure, and letting any intrested editors get on with fixing the articles. 
If I don't hear from anybody about this soon, I may boldly convert it myself. -- SECisek 14:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - I think the scope of the work group should be specifically reduced to only those articles which directly deal with Christianity, though, rather than the current scope which includes several articles not directly related to Christianity. John Carter 16:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: All tags converted to task format. -- SECisek (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion to task force?

message: It has probably been noticed by most of the editors who frequent this page that there is often a pronounced degree of overlap between the various projects relating to Christianity. Given that overlap, and the rather large amount of content we have related to the subject of Christianity, it has been proposed that the various Christianity projects select a group of coordinators who would help ensure the cooperation of the various projects as well as help manage some project related activities, such as review, assessment, portal management, and the like. Preferably, we would like to consider the possibility of having one party from each of the major Christianity projects included, given the degree of specialization which some of the articles contain. We now are accepting nominations for the coordinators positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1. Any parties interested in helping performing some of the management duties of the various Christianity projects is encouraged to nominate themselves there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 17:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much to my surprise, the period for the factual elections of the new coordinators has started a bit earlier than I expected. For what it's worth, as the "instigator" of the proposed coordinators, the purpose of having them is not to try to impose any sort of "discipline" on the various projects relating to Christianity, but just to ensure that things like assessment, peer review, portal maintainance, and other similar directly project-related functions get peformed for all the various projects relating to Christianity. If there are any individuals with this project who are already doing such activities for the project, and who want to take on the role more formally, I think nominations are being held open until the end of the elections themselves. And, for the purposes of this election, any member in good standing of any of the Christianity projects can either be nominated or express their votes at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1. Thank you for your attention. John Carter (talk) 00:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinator? 

message: * I noticed articles connected with Syriac Christianity mention people with the word "Mar" in a context that suggests "Mar" is a title, which, in turn, suggests that there should be an article "Mar".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SlowJog (talk • contribs) 14:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed as well. If anyone knows enough to be able to start such an article, possibly indicating the definitions of the term and the various ways in which it is used, that would be helpful. If it was required to keep the article, it might include a list of individuals who have been referred to often by that title. John Carter (talk) 23:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I've just created  if anyone's interested. — Gareth Hughes (talk) 18:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Article  

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Syriac Christianity work group 

message: Any comments regarding the structure and function of Christianity related material are welcome at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum#Project organization. Be prepared for some rather lengthy comments, though. There is a lot of material to cover there. John Carter (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion regarding project organization 

message: For the purposes of centralized discussion, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy/Archives/2014/December#Proposed mergers. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: Wikipedians at Talk:Roman Catholic Church/Mediation on Naming Convention are discussing the merits of changing the article name as such.
Roman Catholic Church → Catholic Church. Please share your opinions there. --Carlaude talk 12:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Roman Catholic Church/Mediation on Naming Convention|Consultation on renaming article: Roman Catholic Church --> Catholic Church]] 

message: Any parties interested in being one of the coordinators of WikiProject Christianity and its various related projects is encouraged to list themselves as a candidate at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 2. It would be particularly beneficial if we had individuals from as broad a range of areas of the project as possible, to help ensure that we have people knowledgable about the widest range of content possible. John Carter (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinator elections 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: I am currently trying to get together some lists of articles relevant to each Christianity-related portal which could be used, at least potentially, to help bring all the extant portals up to Featured Portal status. The current, admittedly incomplete, list of articles, images, etc., relevant to each portal can be found at User:John Carter/Christianity portals. I also think that, at least in theory, we would probably best use a single article only in a single portal, and that we probably have enough articles to do that, although there might be a few exceptions. I would welcome input from anyone on the associated talk page regarding which articles and other materials they would like to see associated with which portal(s), any suggestions for additional portals or changes to existing portals, etc. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity portals 

message: I have recently started discussion about possibly eliminating the use of a separate talk page for it here. Input from any interested editors is very welcome and encouraged. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 22:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed redirection of Christianity subproject talk pages 

message: I just wanted to note that an user at WP:WikiProject Assyria calls for Syriac Orthodox Christians (Middle East) to be merged into Assyrian people, or deleted. Please join the discussion.--Zoupan 16:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syriac Orthodox Christians (Middle East) 

message: I have created a new template, Template:Episcopal lineage. It is used to display the lineage leading up to a bishop (including archbishops, cardinals, popes, patriarchs, etc.). It is configured to be used for Catholic, Anglican, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and other Christian denominations that maintain a historical episcopate. An example of its use can be found on the template page or in the Pope Francis article. Ergo Sum  04:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New template 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool