Talk:Adelaide–Darwin railway line

message: This article appears to misrepresent the significance of the Old CAR, the New CAR and the final Tarcoola to Darwin line.
I would like to split out the Old CAR from the Story, so that its history is clearly articulated, and separate from the later Tarcoola to Alice CAR and the final Tarcoola to Darwin Line.
Any comments? Sulzer55 (talk) 07:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is a great idea - they're essentially different lines, so they should be delineated much clearer than they are here and at The Ghan. Rebecca (talk) 10:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Totally agree.  I have made wholesale changes to central australia railway and will start stripping some of the content
Skillsy (talk) April 2016  —Preceding undated comment added 14:08, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Railways 

message: Title is Adelaide - Darwin (south to north) and the lead sentence has Adelaide–Darwin railway is a north–south - huh? SatuSuro 10:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 

message: This needs to be explicitly mentioned, along with how trains pass each other if so. Also the article should discuss the degree of usage e.g. km/year compared to other lines... seems to be low usage if single track. Rcbutcher (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Single track ?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adelaide–Darwin railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060831094018/http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=52 to http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/item.asp?dID=52
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose that AustralAsia Rail Corporation be merged into Adelaide-Darwin railway. The existing stub of the former is two paragraphs, the second of which is already on this page with better hyperlinking, and the former of which might contain some information worth adding to Adelaide–Darwin railway#Alice Springs to Darwin, but it's hard to tell because the only references on the page are to primary sources --- one is the company's site, the other is an article published by the CEO of the company that won the contact. Paul "TBBle" Hampson (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal -- [[AustralAsia Rail Corporation]] 

message: Please comment on some proposals potentially affecting this article, here. Cheers,   💬  at 13:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on terminologies

message: Hello Dormskirk, I noticed you deleted "The lease includes provisions for access by other rail operating companies" because it was unreferenced. I often do likewise, but in this case I would prefer to leave the text in place for a while. Reason: the provisions were an entirely new development in Australia for railway infrastructure, in which a company has responsibilities for the line but not exclusivity in its access. In essence it's too important an aspect to leave out. That said, a reference is needed. I'll ask one of my researcher colleagues at the National Railway Museum, Port Adelaide, to find details of the lease that can be referenced. In the meantime, would you object to my reverting the deletion for the time being? Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 23:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Provisions for access in lease

message: The thin spaces appear on my screen as if there were two spaces between "Ghan" and "passenger" and I removed it because (on my laptop screen) the single space displays fine and does not cause a spilling of text into the next word. GLORIOUSEXISTENCE (talk) 21:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thin spaces after ''The Ghan''