Talk:Durand Line

message: Gotitbro how are any of these reference political?
[] [] I request you to go through them once again.
Here is U.S. ambassador claim []:"The United States, as many other countries, have long recognized the Durand Line as the boundary between Afghanistan and Pakistan"
On the contrast there is no source which suggest that Durand line is not an international border apart from objection from Afghanistan. So please do review your opinion and if you believe it is correct then do add them back. Romanov67 (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am taking about removing the president's statement and then adding the statement of another politician. Also, there is no need to repeatedly mention that the Afghan leaders formerly accepted the line, of course they did that is why they signed the treaties which is mentioned. What you are adding is already there in the lead. I agree with the international part and have added it. Gotitbro (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  International border 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Durand Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324104825/http://www.mcci.org.pk/multan_history.asp to http://www.mcci.org.pk/multan_history.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615031212/http://mailer.fsu.edu/~phensel/garnet-phensel/Research/iowa06.pdf to http://mailer.fsu.edu/~phensel/garnet-phensel/Research/iowa06.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130123143833/http://news.monstersandcritics.com/southasia/news/article_1293995.php/Clash_erupts_between_Afghan_Pakistani_forces_over_border_fence to http://news.monstersandcritics.com/southasia/news/article_1293995.php/Clash_erupts_between_Afghan_Pakistani_forces_over_border_fence
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101203051/http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/4721119-pakistan-suggests-curbs-to-end-smuggling-from-afghanistan to http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/4721119-pakistan-suggests-curbs-to-end-smuggling-from-afghanistan
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421183511/http://www.thefrontierpost.com/?p=69232 to http://www.thefrontierpost.com/?p=69232
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120117145213/http://tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/4635-terrorist-safe-havens-in-pakistan-must-go-joint-chiefs-head-says- to http://tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/4635-terrorist-safe-havens-in-pakistan-must-go-joint-chiefs-head-says-
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: How is India’s claim on Pakistani Kashmir related to the Durand Line, an AfPak issue? Not everything about Pakistan involves India. The Indian Claim section doesn’t add anything of relevance and really just seems to exist to shoehorn India into a Pakistan-related article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:202:200:e82f:c052:4a83:9fbf:e00a (talk) 06:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Have to agree. Looks out of step with the rest of the page. Maybe include it on Gilgit-Baltistan’s page or Jammu and Kashmir’s. 2601:202:200:E82F:8D00:CE41:F02A:42A (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

text: Agree. It is out of place on the page, and doesn't really have any relevance to a line between Pakistan and Afghanistan. If this subject were important, it could have its own article. aaronneallucas (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indocentrism?