Talk:World economy

message: GDP numbers (PPP), (currency), during 2003. $50.4 trillion, per person that's $8000(50.4/0.0063).
Per capita GDP growth rates:  set the 1950 PPP GDP at $6.8 trillion,  set the population at 2,555,360,972, that makes the per capita GDP $2,661 in 1950, compared with 2003 there's a 201% increase, that's 2.1% a year (2661*x^53=8000).
Since 1993s $6,599 (36.5/5,531,014,635) it's 1.9% a year (6599*1.9^10=8000). As a comparison, the IMF database put the PPP GDP at $30 trillion during 1993 (), that's $5,424 per person (30/5.531). That's a 4.0% per year growth rate (5424*1.04^10=8000) - Jerryseinfeld 00:38, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDP 

message: Yes, I noticed the discrepency about China, too.  Wikipedia's article on largest economies, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world%27s_largest_economies
lists China as the sixth largest, while this article says it is second.  This may be due to difficulty in measuring China's economy.  Does anyone have a source we can quote?  Carax 02:51, 8 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More China 

message: : # Yearly exports: $1.1 trillion (f.o.b., 2002 est.)
: # Yearly imports: $2.5 trillion (f.o.b., 2002 est.)
These two numbers are by definition exactly equal.
Actually, due to various accounting issues they might differ by a few %,
but this is just ridiculous.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.120.104 (talk) 05:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Import / export numbers are totally fucked up 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Do we need a table like this?
Sector             	Asia	Africa	North America	South America	Europe	Oceania	World
Aerospace & Defense	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Automotive         	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Chemicals          	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Construction       	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Consumer Staples   	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Financial Services 	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Food               	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Health Care        	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Home Construction  	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Industrials        	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Leisure Goods      	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Media              	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Mining             	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Pharmaceuticals    	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Real Estate        	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Support Services   	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Telecomms          	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Travel & Leisure   	    	      	             	             	      	       	
Utilities          	    	      	             	             	      	       	
 92.71.60.62 (talk) 10:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Use sectors per Industry Classification Benchmark?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.61 (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sector summary