Talk:Chakri dynasty

message: There're also the 3rd king too. It's originated by ancient army. The king lead grand army at the center. Upraja, vice king, lead the front line army and other royalty cover the rear. At the period of Ayutthaya, Upraja also called as 'Bantoon' and usually be the oldest son of king. Some time other son might elevated as 'Bantoon Noi' or Little Upraja and also be a second heir of the throne. In Bangkok period there was only one 'Bantoon Noi'. He was a nephew of King Rama I. His palace placed on the the ground that now is Siriraj Hospital, Thai people may call this area as 'Wang Lang' or the rear palace, originated by his duty to cover back in the army in the ancient time.  --Pudtipong Nawasornyuttana 08:17, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Third King 

message: Rama III didn't name himself, Rama IV Named him.  --Pudtipong Nawasornyuttana 08:28, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: His name should be Anandha Mahidol.  --Pudtipong Nawasornyuttana 08:33, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ananda Mahidol 

message: Shouldn't it be written in small letters, "Chakri dynasty", considering nouns in English are normally written small? Gryffindor 16:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of article 

message: Are women allowed to inherit the kingship? What is the succession law?♦Drachenfyre♦·Talk 13:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession

message: Mom Rajawongse Narisa Chakrabongse: The Royal Family of Thailand chronicles the descendants of King Rama V to the present day.  This book is regarded as the bible of Thai royalty.Also Katya and the Prince of Siam tells the life of the Prince and Mom Catherine.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  News 

message: I am wondering if the translation of "great" is truly correct here.  By western standards, calling three kings in just over two hundred years by such an honour, including the current one in his lifetime, would seem as if the Thais are self-aggrandizing their own nation and institutions.  Alterntatively it could be down to translation. Words often have technically correct translation which doesn't always translate well and this means we can interpret things in more than one way e.g. orangutan (Malay language) can be equally tranlated as "old man in the woods" or "man of the forest" yet the imagery inferred to an english speaker in each case is quite different.  At times finding a true translation cannot be donw and we simply use the foreign word e.g. "kitsch".  Of course, I may be entirely wrong and Great may have been appropriately used in each case, if so please convince me. Dainamo (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Great

message: A map would tell a thousand words. I came here after reading that the kingdom was once much larger and that it once included parts of Burma and other regions.
 If anybody has this info or a map (or cares to make one) please include it in the article. Much thanks.BrianAlex (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was this dynasty? 

message: Prince Dhanivat Bidyalabh Bridhyakon (1946) has an article on Thai Wikipedia title "พระวรวงศ์เธอ พระองค์เจ้าธานีนิวัต กรมหมื่นพิทยลาภพฤฒิยากร" also spelled H.H. Prince Dhani Nivat Kromamun Bidyalabh Bridhya]
--Pawyilee (talk) 16:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regents Ninth reign 

message: The family tree shouldn't be a stand-alone article. It would be better to have it as a collapsible box in the main article. Paul_012 (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds completely reasonable to me. I don't envisage that a large amount of debate would accompany this proposal. It would be good to act on this as soon as possible.--Soulparadox (talk) 05:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have implemented the merger. Sodacan (talk) 15:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent work! Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 15:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Chakri Dynasty's Family Tree]] 

message: :Chakri Dynasty →  – This is the only dynasty article in :Category:Asian dynasties, :Category:European dynasties and :Category:Middle Eastern dynasties using a capital D. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 November 2016 

message: The consensus was clearly that the word "dynasty" is not part of a proper noun so I've changed Mangrai Dynasty to lower case, and Celia has changed Phagmodrupa Dynasty.  There are lots more to do if we are serious about consistency.  The article still has links only to Chakri Dynasty with a capital "D".  How about adding some references which use a lower case "d"?  Also, does this policy apply to "House", "Empire" and "Kingdom"?  Dbfirs 20:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a question to ask at the talk page for MOS:CAPS, not here. I'd suggest requesting input there. However, the general guidelines with regard to capitalisation, MOS:CAPS for prose and WP:NCCAPS for article titles, make it clear that unnecessary capitalisation is avoided on Wikipedia.  RGloucester  — ☎ 21:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for replying.  It seems that we have to search Google for every individual article to determine whether the article title is always regarded as a proper name (in which case it's Dynasty, as in Dragon Dynasty) (or just usually, as in this decision on the Egyptian Dynasties), or whether some reliable sources treat the word dynasty as not part of the proper title (as here).  I still think that the first place to look should be the English references given in the article, and this article hasn't any!  All of its English links use a capital D.  Sorry to go on about this.  I'll shut up now!  Dbfirs 22:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency? 

message: The Thai gov't has determined that Vajiralongkorn's reign began upon his father's death, 13 October 2016. -- GoodDay (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Start of Rama X's reign

message: Why does the line of succession tree only begin with King Bhumibol Adulyadej who died in 2016, and not include the 7 previous kings? --TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 02:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added! Sodacan (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line of Succession Tree 

message: Has any of the Chakri descendants done a Y-DNA test? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii (talk) 15:12, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNA. 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:31, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion