Talk:Jimmy Doolittle

message: The caption under the picture of Reagan & Goldwater pinning a 4th star on Gen. Doolittle states Doolittle is "the first Airman to wear 4 stars". This is most certainly incorrect as many Air Force officers were 4 star generals long before Doolittle received his 4th star. (Such as Curtis LeMay & Hoyt Vandenberg jsut to name 2 of many. This should be removed from the caption. (I'm not 100% sure how to do it myself)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.0.149.250 (talk) 04:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of Doolittle receiving 4th star.

message: The article argues with itself in regard to Doolittle's Bachelor's degree:
Having at last returned to complete his college degree, he earned the Bachelor of Arts from the University of California, Berkeley in 1922.
Doolittle was awarded a Bachelor of Arts degree by the University of California, even though he had never finished his studies after leaving to enlist during World War I.
Did he actually finish his studies, or was the degree simply granted by the University of California?68.117.97.62 (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bachelor's degree

message: The picture states that it is a photo of Dolittle and "Colonel" LeMay taken in 1944. LeMay was at least a brigadier general and most likely major general in 1944.
65.122.111.70 (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My father took that picture, and at the time of the photo LeMay was a Colonel.  Googie man (talk) 16:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of Doolittle and Lemay

message: At one time, Gen. Doolittle was chairman of the  President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
He also served as a trustee of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, becoming in time the Chairman of the MIT Corporation board.  I believe that he had a number of different research-related activities regarding his MIT alumna mater. 
These are both significant contributions to the nation and to higher education and research.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.67.43.60 (talk) 00:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Civilian Contributions

message: How strange.  Only a dozen words about Doolittle the racer and not a mention of the GeeBee, one of the most notorious airplanes he ever flew.  There were three legs to the Doolittle stool: Doolittle the test pilot/technologist/engineer, Doolittle the war hero and Doolittle the air racer.  The last is barely acknowledged, though it could be argued that the advances he helped to foster through his racing were if not as important as his other aviation activities, at least significant.----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.62.39.145 (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doolittle air-racing career 

message: I propose the deletion of this paragraph. It's prejudicial, in a sense any American court would recognize; it comes from an acknowledged unreliable source; and it is inconsistent with Doolittle's character as established by more reliable sources. If it was a notable claim, it would warrant inclusion in spite of its dubiousness, but it's not even a particularly notable claim. --Yaush (talk) 16:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A single reference suggests ..." 

message: Doolittle, given all the credit for his aviation skills should have been courtmartialed for allowing the group of B-25's to continue the operation given that the aircraft were so terribly unprepared for the mission resulting in a botched mission and un-necessary loss of crews and loss of all 16 aircraft.  Auxilliary fuel tanks were a given but the aircraft were fitted  with homemade, rectangular tanks that leaked.  Professional, built-for-purpose tanks were available off the shelf and could have provided at least enough extra fuel to drop bombs on Japan and carry on to inland China.  All the navigational devices were useless.  Couldn't they find a compass that showed direction?  Since the carrier made takeoff  questionable because of the limited length of "runway' why did they not consider JATO that was well proven by 1942?  Far from being decorated, he should have been discharged and grounded.  How may more lives of airmen after Tokyo was he responsible for?  David Laker ( with a little flight deck experience) 71.30.206.171 (talk) 19:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doolittle  court martial that he himself suggested.   

message: I have a brochure from the American Aviation Historical Society that Gen. Doolittle autographed in Dec. 1976 pertaining to his 80th birthday.  It includes an alternate-angle photo similar to this one (apparently made from a motion-picture film of the event), which identifies him standing leftmost in the front row of Americans.  Is there any problem or argument against adding this to the article's "World War II, post-raid" or "Postwar" section?--Funhistory (talk) 03:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of Doolittle at Surrender of Japan