lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Green's identities

message: Probably would be worth adding, at least from the divergence theorem Eraserhead1 12:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proofs?

message: The third Green's identity says "if psi is twice continuously differentiable" but psi is not mentioned previously in that section. Overall, this page looks like it needs expansion, correction and tidying up. AstroDave (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Psi is mentinoned right below in the text. It is just an arbitrary smooth function, for which the third Green's identity holds. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Psi

message: The page uses the \oint notation for a surface integral.  It is common to use it for an integral along a closed curve.  How common is the use for surfaces?  Tkuvho (talk) 11:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The <math>\oint</math> sign

message: Bad choice of symbols, they look near identical.  Hai2410 (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They are similar (especially when handwritten) but that kind of notation is pretty standard, and the similarity of the symbols hints that phi and psi are the same type of object here. Khromegnome (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Whose crazy idea was it to use psi and phi

message: Am I wrong or there should be some assumption concerning the regularity of the boundary? Something like piecewise smooth?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.128.48 (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Any assumption on the boundary?

message: Epsilon is not defined, i think  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.80.113 (talk) 21:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  epsilon
Talk:Warrington College of Business

message: * I think that this article is too short, and it does not elaborate on the true depth of the programs being offered by the College (It should be expanded - and the research endeavors should be detailed).  The history of the leadership should also be discussed in further detail, and the rankings need work. Jccort (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving the Article

message: * We should also discuss some of the famous alumni who have graduated from the College. Jccort (talk) 19:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous Alumni

message: Over the last few months WCBA has started using a "Circle W" logo as part of its identity (seen on the website, the Facebook page, Twitter feed, etc.). I can probably get a high quality (even vector) version of the logo (under a free license - :Template:PD-textlogo) for use in this article. I am a current employee in the department, and keeping with Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, I would like to keep my edits to this article to a minimum. --WillMcC (talk) 02:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refer to Wikipedia:DCM#Donating_your_photographs, thanks.  Chzz  ►  02:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have uploaded the image to Commons. My main concern was not the copyright (it is ineligible for copyright), it was the potential COI that would happen if I were to add it to the page myself. --WillMcC (talk) 14:21, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrington Logo
Talk:Our Boarding House

message: Is the Major's cap from the Shriners? Dynzmoar 12:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I find many sources that mention his fez but no specific mention of the Shriners. Pepso 13:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't recall the name, but the fez is familiar

message: Hi:
Please check the edit I made to paragraph 1 of this article and let me know if my correction is off base. (The previous version said "fustian," which was [surely] a typo.)
Thanks,
Doug
After looking up both words in a dictionary, I think fustian is a better fit.  I'm changing it back. SlowJog (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepso: Please check the edit I made to paragraph 1 of the "Our Boarding House" article and let me know... 

message: : In 2005, publisher Leonard G. Lee of Canada's Algrove Publishing reprinted Aherns' work ...
This language suggests that Mr Lee did the reprint on his own, as a side project unrelated to his role at Algrove (whatever that might be). Is that intended? —Tamfang (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job. —Tamfang (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  who published?
Talk:Ribonuclease P

message: The last line in the article should be removed, or rewritten:
Eukaryotic RNase P RNA mediates cleavage in the absence of protein http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/7/2062    130.243.248.239 12:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Developmental robotics

message: As any definitions of Developmental Robotics and Epigenetic Robotics will be so very similar it makes much sense to merge these pages Aplloyd 12:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:EXCOMM

message: This book Sheldon Stern - The Cuban Missile Crisis in American Memory: Myths versus Reality (Stanford Nuclear Age Series) is skeptical of some accounts of ExComm meetings presented by ExComm members themselves in the years after the crisis. In particular he is hard on RFK's account in Thirteen Days, and he writes "some writers [...] have chosen instead to use the extremely inaccurate 1997 Harvard Press transcripts, the more reliable 2001 Miller Center/Norton transcripts, or my own 2003 narrative of the meetings." (p.3)
Anyway, his point is that much eyewitness testimony of the ExComm meetings is not to be trusted and contradicts the audio tapes which are, in his opinion, the definitive primary source.
Here's where I'm going: under normal circumstances, fact vs. fiction can be discussed on talk pages, but in this case there is a massive dust cloud surrounding the topic, so I think helping the reader appreciate the size and shape of this dust cloud is going to make for a better article. I'm pretty sure this is against standard Wikipedia policy—under normal circumstances, content that depends only upon unreliable sources should be removed—but I think there is reason to believe that this is an exceptional case. DavidBrooksPokorny (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable vs. Unreliable Sources
Talk:Western Academy of Beijing

message: OK I just want to say that this article is literally an advertisement. I'ts nowhere near as good as stated on their website and on this page. WAB kind of has a tendency to bend the rules a little when it comes to false advertising, and this wiki page is no exception... I see people here talking about a "vandaliser", but the true vandaliser here is the person who wrote all this "glorious" information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.1.1.1 (talk) 10:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement/Propaganda?

message: There is no meaningful content here and the article is a potential candidate for deletion unless you can tell us why the school is notable. Dahliarose 13:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: WAB is a notable school in Beijing for many many reasons. You have to be at WAB to know it, the school is welcoming, the students are nice, the teachers respect you, you can always show your talents, you have lots of activities, people around you are INTERESTING, school marks are NOT everything, there aren't much bullies and cliques, you don't get rated into grades like in some other school, and you learn useful things at WAB, not like some schools that makes you learn to memorize Pi. And students are HAPPY at WAB because you get ever so much friends.
P.S. It's not very nice for you to say that about WAB even if you are from ISB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpangmpang (talk • contribs) 08:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To Dahliarose: On Why WAB is a Notable School

message: Someone changed centre to center. LOL I know its a tiny change but its completely unnecessary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Czhang zodo (talk • contribs) 23:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary minor changes
Talk:Brougham Place, North Adelaide

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Light Square, Adelaide which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Disused railway stations on the Riviera Line

message: This article is about disused stations between Newton Abbot and Kingswear but over time the title has been changed on a couple of occasions and now describes it as the Riviera Line. As that line runs from Exeter to Paignton, I propose that we change this article one more time so that it is Disused railway stations on the Newton Abbot to Kingswear Line. Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of this article
Talk:Nabunturan

message: HELLO AND GOOD EVENG... KOMASTA TAGA NABUNTURAN I HOPE NA MAU ONTA NAG DAGAN SA ATONG PANG GOBERNO DIHA OG ANG PROGRESO SA ATONG LONGSOD OG MAOSWAGON PA KANONAY... GOD BLESS 
FROM THE TFC OF CANADA R.R.C
Nabunturan never rose to 1st level from a 2nd class of Municipality as of 2009. 15 years ago the progress of nabunturan was eminent but now that progress was never to be found. Few people are asking about the future of nabunturan, Is the town heading for a Cityhood (which i think not even close to compostela, or is it heading for a ghost town. Crime rate here is up 20% from last year (2-3 deaths related to petty crime per month)and our local police are keeping mums about it. 40% of prominent people here are moving out of the town for safety and businesses are closing. I think this is a wake up call for the Local government of nabunturan. We cannot let our children grow up in this town unprotected by the crime that has been very rampant. Municipal ordinances seems never existed even if it was enacted. So the real thing here....nabunturan is drowning to its mountainous civil problems.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.243.44 (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Rocketplane Limited, Inc.

message: Addendum: Of the "key people" listed in this wiki, only one remains. Urie and Herrington have both left. French, the CEO, has hired a few replacements. Some French claims to have hired have connections to Lockheed-Martin's F-22 projects. The company is trying to get new funding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.160.122.119 (talk) 16:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2008 Status

message: Rocketplane still exists as a corporate entity, and has plans for developing their suborbital rocket technology.  They do not have all of the funding necessary to put their plans on any kind of a firm schedule.  There is a very informative Jeff Foust interview of Chuck Lauer of Rocketplane Global / Rocketplane Kistler that was filmed in April 2009 at the Space Access '09 conference.  Here is the link:  .  At 5:00 minutes into the interview he gives an update on "Rocketplane Kistler, the orbital side" of the Rocketplane xyz business.  "Rocketplane Global" is focusing on the suborbital part of the business, the 6-passenger rocketplane design that they solidified in 2007;  RG is still working the financing to pursue building the spacecraft (covered earlier in the interview).  And here  is another link to recent RK info.  I'll leave it to other enterprising editors to update the article, which is, as of now, badly dated.N2e (talk) 20:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2009 Status

message: This reference in NewSpace Journal on April 11th indicates Rocketplane Global (redlinked non-existent WP article as of 2010-04-13) may be making a Florida play, or at least, has made some public announcements to that effect.  1) While probably not very relevant to the Rocketplane Limited, Inc. article, nor maybe the Rocketplane Kistler article, it does point out that Wikipedia probably has no article about RG that it should, while both the RL and RK articles are terribly dated.  2) This is two years in a row now where Lauer has been making announcments about the R_Global-named entity. N2e (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2010 status

message: Media article published in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin Journal-Sentinel newspaper:  Financial meltdown scuttles dreams of Green Bay's rocket man, 2010-12-11, accessed 2010-12-13.  It is a major in-depth piece, focused on the founder, and will no doubt prove useful as a source for the article.  N2e (talk) 19:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2010: media source for the article

message: I propose merging this article into the Rocketplane Global Inc. article, and making this article redirect there.  
The two articles cover substantially the same content. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 17:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:King George V Silver Jubilee Medal

message: The list of notable recipients on this page rather dominates this article – comprising over two-thirds of it's length – even though the recipients are only of peripheral interest to the subject, which is the medal itself. I have therefore moved the list to a separate page.
Happy to discuss if anyone has any views – for example, should the information be included as the category "Recipients of the George V Silver Jubilee Medal"?</br> Hsq7278 (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not particularly bothered either way whether the lists of notable recipients are on this page or a separate page. Regarding the suggested category, such a category existed until 2012, but was deleted as being non-defining: see discussion here. The lists were added to this page following the category deletion. Paora (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The list was fine was where it was, as the page wasn't WP:TOOLONG. The list itself doesn't have stand-alone notability, for the same reasons the category was deleted (given above). I'm hence reversing the undiscussed WP:SPLIT, but happy for discussion to continue to establish whether or not there's a consensus (WP:BRD). Klbrain (talk) 19:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable recipients
Talk:Bratislavský lesný park

message: Such types of objects have no "English official names" - most mountains in Slovakia do not have an English official name, a park barely known by anybody does not have such a name all the more. Juro 13:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st comment

message: This entry should have multiple sources and more references.Schnarr 04:11, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing Sources 
Talk:King armored car

message: I created this article hoping more knowledgeable wikiusers would take it from there. All help is appreciated!!!--MKnight9989 13:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

message: For this article to become a B, it needs at least twice as much info.  Also, two large redlinks don't look good in an intro.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 03:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the input. --AtTheAbyss (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To become a B 

message: Due to using several resources which didn't mention the King by name, I created an article on the AMC armored car.  Later realised it's actually the King, so redirected to this article.  That said, my page had some pretty good tech detail and links, so please feel free to mine it:  User:MatthewVanitas/King Armored Car. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More details to mine on my userpage 

message: Here's an AMC patent filed in 1916, think this might be the one?  http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1358579.pdf
MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible patent for the King? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 23:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: King Armored Car →  – Per WP:MILMOS and WP:LOWERCASE. WP:MILMOS#Capitalization "". Also for consistency, e.g., among :Category:Armored cars of the United States. There have been several closely related RMs recently; perhaps the most similar is the one at Talk:M1 armored car#Requested move 25 February 2024 —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 March 2024
Talk:Old Dee Bridge

message: #The article needs to be expanded.
#It should make use of sections.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Peter I. Vardy 13:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: I am not happy with the reliability of the source ChesterTourist.com.  Please see the comment here. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Hai Peng

message: No other article entiteled “Hai Peng” exists, therefore the disambiguation is not only completely redundantly, but also user-hostilely, because one would search for “Hai Peng” and not “Hai Peng (Pirates of the Caribbean)”.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.144.106.39 (talk • contribs) 
:This appears uncontroversial, so I have moved it for the IP user. I also added a dablink for a Chinese general with a similar last name. I'll leave it up to others to decide whether this movie ship warrants an article. Dekimasuよ! 06:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Acetochlor

message: Reference 9 is the same as reference 10. Reference 9 should refer to amphibians and thyroid function as suggested in the text. 
72.204.187.125 (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Michigan sports

message: Awesome template Tom.  What about the rest of the colleges in Michigan?  There are a number of colleges that are Division I in hockey, such as Ferris State University, Lake Superior State University, Michigan Tech University, etc.  Since the font is smaller, maybe they get added?
Also, is the template just for sports TEAMS in Michigan?  Or do you mean for it to include SPORTS in Michigan?  I think it would be useful to add stuff like Mr. Basketball of Michigan, MHSAA, or other Michigan-only sports-related "events", not necessarily just high school like the ones I thought of.  X96lee15 13:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional college teams 

message: Is this template bleeding into the lower template on other people's computers? If you look at UDM's article, and place the template anywhere but the bottom, it bleed rights into the next template. Why is this? --Mikerussell 18:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I could tell, the template was missing the closing "|}".  I added it and that should probably stop the "bleeding" (pun intended). X96lee15 00:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This template displays oddly
Talk:80th Anniversary Armistice Remembrance Medal

message: The adf website says there was a 1967 Anzac commemorative medal, which would make the statement at the start of the article about the 80th anniversary medal being the first false.
:The Anzac Commemorative Medallion was not a wearable medal with a place in the order of wear. That and the statement in question: It is the first commemorative medal in the Australian Honours System. is still accurate. The Australian Honours System did not come about until 1975. EricSerge (talk) 23:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  first commemorative medal?
Talk:Dunsmuir House

message: Articles really ought to have an introductory blurb at the beginning, so I digested the article and wrote a short one. Nice little article. It's good to see contributed photos, too. --Darkbane 13:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: On another note, I am worried about possible copyright infringement as the official site has descriptions that are very similar, making me think that most of this article was copy-pasted and some words changed. The Grounds and Architecture section are also directly lifted from the homepage. If you are the original author of the text, you need to indicate on the homepage that the text is either in the public domain or published as GFDL. Please address these concerns, as I'd hate to blank out this article and replace it with a copyright investigation notice. --Darkbane 13:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How different does the article need to be from the source of information? One rule requires no original research, another says don't copy someone else's research.  Where is the middle road? --Mactographer 08:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are not the original author and/or do not hold the copyright to the original text, it needs to be written from scratch. You can use the original stuff by writing from scratch and inserting citations (mostly for anything that is likely to be disputed, but a citation for some number or so will help establish verifiability), in which case it will no longer fall under original research either. --Darkbane talk  11:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've done the best I can on the first half.  Problem is, history flows in a chronological format.  The stuff that happens first, gets mentioned first, and so on.  So I pretty much have rewritten the history in the same order since the official site is my only known major source of history.  So it looks like it's copied.  Don't know how to fix that. --Mactographer 08:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my understanding it's perfectly acceptable to read a source and then write it again in your own words. It's copypasting and then changing a couple of words that is the real problem. I wanted to bring this to your attention, and now you are aware of it. =) --Darkbane talk  11:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you've done some nice work.  I like the info box too.  Thanks for the help getting this listing up to snuff. --Mactographer 21:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:
the Dunsmuir house is not downtown ?!
: Looks like the information in the National Historic Registry is inaccurate.  — Dispenser 15:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Ika language (Nigeria)

message: This article, ostensibly about a language, tells me that "Ifeanyi Okowa is a prominent son of Ika background". And then it goes on to tell me about the people's religion, wine, etc. Why? (I came close to deleting all this stuff.)
What about the language? The article tells me virtually nothing, other than that it's Igboid. (And the article Igboid languages tells me nothing about Igboid languages, other than that they exist and are spoken here and there.) -- Hoary (talk) 07:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Prominent son"
Talk:Lycopod

message: Not sure why this article was blanked; perhaps the information (what little there is here so far) would be better somewhere else, but in that case it should be made into a redirect page. MrDarwin 13:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a redirect now. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Inside Higher Ed

message: Why has the information on Inside Higher Education's previous owner, Quad Partners, been removed?  This was a significant part of IHE's history. The article now reads like an advertisement.--CollegeMeltdown (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitewashing of Inside Higher Education Article