Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2007 Archive Oct 2

message: ;Sites spammed
*
*
*
*
*
;Spammers
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
;Cross-wiki spammers
*
*
*
*
*
*
Persistent dynamic IP spam, always readded if removed. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 09:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blacklisted. MER-C 11:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

text: --Herby talk thyme 07:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

text: No small wiki spam. MER-C 12:15, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.eclipse-glasses.(com|net|eu) spam.venuscope.com

message: This site was spammed by a few IP's, then the user mentioned below. The site is owned by Wazup Media as shown here. 
*
*
--Versageek 04:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  localhands.com coi spam 

message: An advertisement ridden directory site, it's also got 1 hit on es.wp . 
*
* 
--Versageek 16:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  internet-searching.info 

message: This looks very spammy to me:
* Changing name of article without discussion diff (with mention of making the term more "searchable"?)
* Suggesting that this term was coined by a company (without citation)
* Immediately adding an external link to the company's website
Not to say that the article was a bastion of encyclopedic integrity before, but these actions don't sit right. Nposs 22:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if it's not promotion (which is what it looks like to me), it's not a good change.  Nice clean up on the article too.  - SiobhanHansa 02:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second opinion: Iconnnicholoson and [[social shopping]]/[[social retailing]] 

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
A number of the links also look like copyvios.  
All IPs are Canadian.  By pure coincidence the website is registered to a Canadian address.  Not that that's the clincher really.
-- SiobhanHansa 02:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  surftofind.com 

message: ;Spam pages
*
*
;Sites spammed
;Spammers
*
*
*
MER-C 10:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.learning2dance.com http://spam.markballas.com http://spam.teamsabrinaonline.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 10:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.thebeyond.info 

message: ;Sites spammed
http://spam.6nationsrugby.net
*
http://spam.rugby-world-cup.net
*
http://spam.uk-racing-results.com
*
http://spam.tote-betting.net
*
http://spam.cheltenham-festival.co.uk
*
http://spam.aintree-grand-national.net
*
http://spam.grand-national-guide.com
*
http://spam.betting-directory.com
*
;Spammers
*
*
*
MER-C 10:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rugby spam 

message: ;Spammers
*
May have value, so not pushing that hard. MER-C 10:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.teachers.tv 

message: ;Spammers
*
*
MER-C 10:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cmsimple.com.br 

message: ;Spammers
*
*
MER-C 10:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changing to A. B.'s ipwhois for the COIBot user links.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.dazzlingindia.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 11:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.recordstore.co.uk spam.digitalstores.co.uk 

message: Hello. Can you tell me please why you put me on your list of spammers today (8 October) for a link to National Geographic from the article Lisa Gherardini? Please reply on my talk page if you possibly can. -Susanlesch 14:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Hi, thanks for the quick reply. The two links where I found this are under Gherardini "What links here", Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2007, Oct 8 and Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/news.nationalgeographic.com. (Yes same SL.) If there's something wrong with linking to National Geographic News I can find another ref but it seemed like a good source for the purpose it serves. -Susanlesch 14:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My advice is ignore it. It is just a robot generated page which lists all links of a particular type for someone to check. Anyone checking that link would see it is ok. --BozMo talk 14:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Indeed, you can ignore it.  It was caught by my bot due to an accidental overlap between username and link (an earlier report, not yours).  In most of the cases this suggests a conflict of interest and such links are then automatically monitored, but in this case there is absolutely nothing.  I have whitelisted the link and removed it from the monitor list.  I will also delete the report shortly.  Thanks for notifying us!  --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *Yes, please do delete it. Thanks for your reply. -Susanlesch 17:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I deleted the two copies I know of. Are there more? -Susanlesch 17:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Spam for an industry organization is being added to insurance-related articles.  Is not germane to the articles, examples here and here.  Also spamming irrelevant internal links pointing to America’s Health Insurance Plans, IMO a promotional article with no claims of notability.  
http://spam.ahip.org/
*
http://spam.ahipresearch.org/
*
;Spammers
*
CliffC 12:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insurance-industry spam; spammed internal links 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 08:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.hydraulic-press-lienchieh.com 

message: In particular, this book:
*  (2007): Parrots of Africa (1st edition). Halberstadt, Germany . http://spam.amazon.co.uk/Parrots-Africa-Stefan-Luft/dp/3833484454/ref=sr_1_2/202-3651348-8438216?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191917303&sr=1-2]. 
;Spammers
*
Look out for the spam page . MER-C 08:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon parrot spam 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 08:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.kanagawa-kankou.or.jp 

message: ;Spammers
*
Has some links interwiki. Is it worth having, or is meta fodder? MER-C 09:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.yarzheit.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
*
MER-C 11:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.tutubipatrol.blogspot.com 

message: I've been wanting to learn how to gather AdSense information.  From what I've read here, there's an id #.  I'm guessing once you know how to get the #, you then look for the same number at other suspect sites. --Ronz 02:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does "google_ad_client =" give the id #? --Ronz 02:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's it - it's always of the form pub- followed by 16 digits.  -- SiobhanHansa 02:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Ronz 03:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How to get AdSense info?

message: ;Spammers
*
*
*
*
Cross-posted from m:Talk:Spam blacklist#sudpontino.net. All wiki spamsearch results (after 4 links removed on en):

Results for en.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Campodimele URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
Results for de.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
 Page: Formia URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/formia
 Page: Minturno URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/minturno
Results for ja.wikipedia.org...
 Page: カンポディメーレ URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
 Page: フォンディ URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
 Page: イトリ URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/itri
 Page: レーノラ URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/lenola
 Page: ミントゥルノ URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/minturno
Results for it.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Campodimele URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
 Page: Gaeta URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/gaeta
 Page: Itri URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/itri
 Page: Lenola URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/lenola
 Page: Minturno URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/minturno
Results for nl.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Campodimele URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
 Page: Minturno URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/minturno
Results for pt.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Campodimele URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
 Page: Formia URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/formia
 Page: Itri URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/itri
 Page: Lenola URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/lenola
 Page: Minturno URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/minturno
Results for pl.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Campodimele URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
Results for ca.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
Results for vo.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Campodimele URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/campodimele
 Page: Fondi URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/fondi
 Page: Formia URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/formia
 Page: Itri URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/itri
 Page: Lenola URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/lenola
 Page: Minturno URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/minturno
Results for br.wikipedia.org...
 Page: Formia URL: http://www.sudpontino.net/formia

Test wiki is down, so there could be more spam. MER-C 06:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.sudpontino.net 

message: Is this kosher? Special:Contributions/LeslieBD - no external links added, but nevertheless it looks like a kind of advertisement. Han-Kwang (t) 16:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would describe the information as non-encyclopedic, and probably spam.  I'll revert.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benchmark capital 

message: *
;Account
*
Reported by Videmus Omnia  Talk  17:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: New link addition. MER-C 11:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.maximumfun.org 

message: Is this kosher? Special:Contributions/LeslieBD - no external links added, but nevertheless it looks like a kind of advertisement. Han-Kwang (t) 16:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would describe the information as non-encyclopedic, and probably spam.  I'll revert.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benchmark capital 

message: *
*
*
;Spammers
*
There's probably editors who've added these links in good faith, but the last two should go. MER-C 09:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.simpletoremember.com http://spam.heartoftn.net/users/gary27 http://spam.sagavyah.tripod.com  

message: ;Spam pages
*
*
;Sites spammed
;Spammers
*
MER-C 10:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.xbrain.biz 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 10:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.arge.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 11:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.ethiopiantreasures.co.uk 

message: *
*
*
;Spammers
*
MER-C 12:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.biscuit-recipes.co.uk http://spam.kids-cookbook.com http://spam.bun-recipes.co.uk 

message: *
*
Google ad-sense = pub-3317333198156835
*
*
*
Had a bit of a conversation with Cphillips on his talk page which looked like it was going to be productive, but a new IP was back the same day.  -- SiobhanHansa 15:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: http://spam.collegetips.com and http://spam.college-freshman.com

message: *
;Account
*
Reported by Videmus Omnia  Talk  17:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.bloodygoodhorror.net 

message: Hello. This filter blocked Undo to revert vandalism on Green turtle. The vandalism is a greater concern than a blacklisted link. Can you possibly fix this? -Susanlesch 17:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, AngelOfSadness for fixing Green turtle. I wonder if blocking saves is questionable. Hope this helps. -Susanlesch 17:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should only be an issue on the rare occasions when a link is added to the blacklist in between  the time a vandal makes an edit and an editor reverts.  Also the information required to fix the issue is included in the message that the saving editor receives - s/he only has to go back and remove the link as well - it could be displayed a little better (to say the least), but I believe that would require a developer to fix!  -- SiobhanHansa 18:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it happens when any page with a blacklisted link is 1) vandalized, and then 2) Undo or reverted. Some but not all people may have the inclination and ability to dechiper what link(s) need to be removed, make that edit, then fix the vandalism. (In my case that day I had only a minute or two available to Undo and then abandoned ship. Sorry about that.) -Susanlesch 21:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: One does not need a developer for that, those texts are stored in the MediaWiki namespace, in this case I believe it is: MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext.  Every admin can change the wording there.  Would it be up to this project to find a better text for that?  --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As you said, any admin can change it, but I believe we're particularly suited for it. Shadow1 (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam protection filter

message: *
;Accounts
*
*
*
*
Blatant vandalism.   was modified so that each company name linked to itdatahouse, then this article was copied to  where it has been speedily deleted twice already.  The same link vandalism was done to . --Ronz 17:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still spamming. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 11:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: spam.itdatahouse.com

message: This is your basic "made for adsense" site - looks like the user is testing the waters by spamming a small variety of unrelated topics. 
*
*
--Versageek 02:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  areapyme.tk 

message: These users attempted to add this link to several Hindu related templates tonight, with link text that described it as "The Hindu Wikipedia". I'll AGF, and say they're confused rather than deliberately trying to confuse others. The site itself looks decent, but it definitely doesn't belong in our templates. 
*
*
*
--Versageek 04:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.hinduwiki.com 

message: *
;Account
*
Reported by Videmus Omnia  Talk  06:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.ncsx.com 

message: *
;Spammers
*
*
MER-C 12:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.sharepricesms.com 

message: Several highschools:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Sharing IP:
*  (most of the sites)
*  (only one)
By user:
* 
--Dirk Beetstra T C 20:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  highschool spam 

message: ;Previous incidents
*August 2007
;Spam pages
*
;Sites spammed
*
*
*
;Spammers
*
*
*
*
MER-C 08:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.mastyspot.blogspot.com spam.mastyspot.co.nr spam.mastyspot.freeforums.org 

message: ;Previous incidents
*Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2007 Archive Aug#http://spam.2-clicks-stamps.com http://spam.all-about-seashells.com
;Sites spammed
*
*
*
;Spammers
*
*
*
Already blacklisted on shadowbot, but that didn't stop them. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 10:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.2-clicks-outdoorfurniture.com spam.2-clicks-stamps.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 08:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.eurocrime.co.uk 

message: From the archives.  
Two more spammers:
*
*
Is there an admin around who could take a look at the local blacklisting request?  Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 11:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Beetstra.  -- SiobhanHansa 14:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  surftofind.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
*
*
*
MER-C 11:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.buddhabihar.com 

message: Persistent addition of personal blog to Elmira, New York from single purpose account.
Links:
Users:
Thanks. ccwaters 01:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: spam.ielmira.com

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
;Spammers
*
Listed IP at WP:OP. MER-C 08:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egregious porn linkspamming 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 09:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.nebero.com 

message: ;Accounts
*
Note that the user has other constructive contributions. MER-C 09:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.musicplace.co.nr 

message: ;Accounts
*
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Keb25 (talk • contribs) 
:Timestamp for archiving. MER-C 13:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: http://spam.redbullmusicacademy.com

message: ;Spammers
*
Cross posted from WP:COIN#User:Rampartpress. MER-C 13:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.rampartpress.com 

message: *
;Account
*
Reported by Videmus Omnia  Talk  22:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.hollywood-trends.blogspot.com 

message: *
;Account
*
Reported by Videmus Omnia  Talk  01:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http:spam.askjohnq.com 

message: ;Links
*
;User
*
I'm not sure if these links, to audio interviews with various authors, are considered spam or not. This user, who started editing two days ago, isn't adding the links, which are already in the articles, but his/her edits are mostly limited to updating the titles of the links in order to add "at Wired for Books.org", which may or may not be a form of advertising. Wired for Books seems like a good thing, but perhaps a variation on the on-going "Archivist" theme. Katr67 16:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats an odd one... Seems weird to me, but if the Link is ok then the title is just a matter of semantics. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 14:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.wiredforbooks.org 

message: New single-purpose user now doing the same thing. 
;User
*
Katr67 21:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More

message: ;Spam pages
*
;Sites spammed
;Spammers
*
MER-C 10:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Account is already blocked. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 14:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.businessofcinema.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
*
*
*
MER-C 11:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: GaryTheReason posted a question about this at the helpdesk: Wikipedia:Help_desk#Question_about_adding_relevant_external_links_to_date_related_pages. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 14:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.thevoiceofreason.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 11:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.sialkotexport.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 11:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.dotnetwatch.com 

message: * 
* 
* 
;Spammers
*
*
See also this WP:ANI report. 
This fellow has been changing accounts when caught. I suggest blacklisting these domains. - Jehochman  Talk 19:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.humanthermodynamics.com 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 09:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.oplenac.org.yu 

message: ;Spammers
*
MER-C 13:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://spam.lokesewa.com 

message: User is attempting to create articles for clients on its client list: anvilmediainc.com/full-client-list.htm Including Retrevo, GolfNow.com, Portland Oregon Visitors Association and ColumbiaSoft. Also spamming links to:
;Links
;User
Please ban to the blackest depths of the blacklist. Thanks. Katr67 21:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to blacklist, which you can request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist, please don't post live URLs as they will prevent this page from being saved. You also need to get the spammer blocked, probably by posting to WP:ANI (in this case). MER-C 13:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Anvilmedia]] COI and spamming 

message: *
*
*
;Spammers
*
*
*
Cross posted from WP:ANI#Undo links (permanent link). MER-C 09:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still spamming, as pointed out on my talk page. Blacklisting requested. MER-C 04:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.eleu.net spam.eleuthera.com spam.bahamashomesite.com 

message: ;Links
*
;User
*
COI. Has been warned and has stopped for now. I think we need a user protection program for all these interns who have been told to spam by their employers. :-\ P.S. Note the link can be used as a legit reliable source. Katr67 02:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: http://spam.thephoenix.com

message: added to articles about various Hollywood and Pro Sports people.. There are a few different URL's, but all of the articles were written by Jon Hopwood. 
*
*associatedcontent.com/user/32688/jon_hopwood_.html Associated Content articles by Jon Hopwood
--Versageek 07:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  associatedcontent.com articles by Jon Hopwood 

message: #I stumbled across the user page of User:Rendering by accident. The user was assigned to several categories of the article main space. I then noticed that the user also used the template:Infobox company for his page. Then I took a step backwards and realized that this page was created just like a real article, but in the user space to avoid easy detection and speedy deletion or an AfD. I changed the category references to pointing links (added the ":" in front of the categories) and removed the infobox template. Each with a long message in the edit summary what I did and why. I did not "flash" the user page, because that would appear as if I would vandalize the user page. The user page was created a couple months ago and except for the Wikipedia:Introduction and his user page was nothing else edited by that user. See Special:Contributions/Rendering
##What is the best way to approach this? 
##Is there a template that should be placed to mark the user as "to be deleted"? 
##What would be the right approach if the user has such a page but some legit edits in main space articles?
#Second thing. I suggest that there will be sent out a bot to remove "infobox xxx" templates from user pages. Maybe only users home pages and not pages created like at  "user:user/pagename" to avoid removal of templates from real work in progress pages that are being prepared for the article main space but still being drafted. 
#The detection of users assigned to main space categories is a bit tougher, because that can happen by error (happened to me too) and you can't tell easily if a category is used for the main space or not. 
:Thoughts, ideas, suggestions, answers anybody? Thanks. I would be surprised if this issue is not already debated and acted on somewhere. Just pointing me to the appropriate project or page will be sufficient. If not, then there should be one IMO :). Thanks and cheers! --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 23:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CSD#G11. There is effectively zero tolerance for this kind of spamming. MER-C 08:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How do I report/flag something like this. I don't have permission to delete a user. :) Thanks. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 23:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You tag it for speedy deletion with . TCC (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User creation for self promotional purposes 

message: Spammers:
* 
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
See also: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clint_Borgen and Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Borgen_Project.
Has been ongoing for years and includes POV pushing into article content with links to the site as cites.  Given the lack of methodology and the lack of significance of the group their statements should not be influencing our content.  Recommending for blacklisting, is on many wikis, by the looks of it due to being copied from en: articles so will start with meta and see how that fares. -- SiobhanHansa 12:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done on meta -- SiobhanHansa 13:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: borgenproject.org 

message: *
*Related, but no evidence of spamming 
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Editor jumps from IP to IP so warning will miss anyway. Local blacklist request submitted .  -- SiobhanHansa 21:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  spam.choosehelp.com