Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Noticeboard

message: I'm sure I mentioned Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mishk'vei ishah before. But I can't find it in this page's history, or archives.
Its still at AfD, if anyone wants to express their view. Newman Luke (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mishk'vei ishah|Anal sex in the Bible]] (Mishk'vei ishah) 

message: There is a discussion related to LGBT issues at the Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup‎ page. Grim23★ 02:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 FIFA World Cup 

message: I propose that we add a commitment to accessibility and equality to the Five pillars. Please join discussion at Wikipedia talk:Five pillars#Accessibility and equality. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility and equality as core policies 

message: There seems to have been a bit of a situation brewing at Liberace; over the past several months, there seems to have been a slow-motion edit war consisting of anonymous IPs removing LGBT-related categories from the article on the grounds that denying it during his lifetime somehow proves that he wasn't, followed by a signed-in Wikipedia editor later readding them, followed by another anonymous IP removing them again, lather, rinse, repeat. 
Obviously this isn't acceptable, so I need to ask for some additional eyes to watchlist the article in case this crops up again. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 02:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberace 

message: At time of writing, clicking the "What links here?" link at the Nan Joyce article shows that Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Noticeboard links there because Nan Joyce was identified by a bot as containing so-called "LGBT keywords". Since Nan Joyce is heterosexual, I am curious to know what "LGBT keywords" precisely were in the article I wrote. It was not my intention to suggest that she is a lesbian. Where is the list of "LGBT keywords", and which did I use? — O'Dea (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT keywords? 

message: Greetings! In accordance with the conditions set forth in the previous discussion of the Bradley Manning/Chelsea Manning title dispute, a new move request has been filed and is now underway. bd2412 T 20:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request‎]] 

message: Hi LGBT studies people.
This article for creation was tagged for speedy deletion under WP:G13, as it had not been edited for months. Retter was significant enough for a Los Angeles Times obituary. I've added a JSTOR ref. Could you possibly have a little look at this article?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yolanda Retter]] 

message: I've been accused of including a "transphobic" item for the April Fool's version of WP:Selected anniversaries. Please comment at WT:Selected anniversaries/April 1#Unfunny jokes. The blurb in question is:
* 528 – The daughter of Emperor Xiaoming of China's Northern Wei dynasty underwent a sex change and was installed as Emperor for a single day.
As the story goes, the emperor's infant daughter was announced to be a boy by the Empress Dowager and then installed on the throne as Emperor. So in the tradition of the WP:April Fool's Main Page, we mislead the reader by implying something other than the truth by using wording which is technically accurate. I am genderqueer myself and I didn't see anything wrong with it, but would like additional opinions. Thanks. —howcheng  {chat} 10:37, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  April Fool's OTD 

message: I've indef-blocked a user for anti-transgender soapboxing on his talk page. However, as I have little experience in these matters, I'd appreciate a 2nd opinion. Rklawton (talk) 00:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd opinion requested

message: You are invited...	
 You are invited...
	
LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon
*Hosts: Women in Red, Wiki Loves Pride 2016
*16 to 30 June 2016
*#wikiwomeninred
--Ipigott (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for posting! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: You are invited

message: The complaints are the same as before, since they have not been addressed in all these months by the Wikiproject. I'm also expanding my complaints against her to the entry Anal sex, where User talk:Flyer22 Reborn is also taking her temper tantrum against me and the reliable sources I use. She also straight away insulted me, saying I'm POV pushing, without even explaining HOW. As long as the board refuses to address the problem, it won't be go away, as Fly is beyond reasoning. Rafe87 (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitration request: Deletion of sourced content motivated by personality disagreements 2

message: I found an old conversation on Template talk:Infobox Wikipedia user about the gender field. I mentioned that pronouns should be included, too. Just thought I would notify you here. = paul2520 21:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template talk:Infobox Wikipedia user 

message: Please comment here. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please comment on this RfC on Donald Trump regarding LGBT rights 

message: I have suggested that Recognition of same-sex unions in Germany move to Same-sex marriage in Germany.  Discussion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I'd be grateful for some opinions about flagging talk pages of articles on living persons with the WP LGBT project where the subjects have not 'come out' as having LGBT lifestyles. I would like to have opinions as to whether such LGBT flagging can be used without transgressing WP:BLP, where the subject has not admitted to leading an LGBT lifestyle. I've recently noted two examples amongst UK current/former politicians - but there may be more.
*Keith Vaz. Talkpage flagged with "WikiProject LGBT studies / Person". Vaz has been accused of going out with male escorts according to the article (with citations given).  However these accusations have not been proved, nor apparently has Vaz made any response to them one way or the other. This seems to me clearly to violate WP:BLP.
*Michael Portillo. Portillo gave a newspaper interview in 2010 where he admitted having homosexual experiences when younger. This is mentioned in the article and cited. Apparently he has never made any other comments on this topic. An editor recently sought to flag the article with "WikiProject LGBT studies". I contested this and our discussion can be seen on the Portillo talkpage. This seems to me to violate WP:BLP by drawing WP:UNDUE attention to Portillo's interview admission - really a form of WP:COATRACKING - and thereby distorting what should be a neutral, NPOV biography.
I would be glad for opinions. --Smerus (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP/ Flagging articles with LGBT project. 

message: *Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Labeling_or_categorizing_BLP_subjects_as_TERFs_or_trans-exclusionary_radical_feminists
Feedback request: This is a long discussion already. It is worth highlighting in just the opening statement there are unusual claims made about "transgender editors", which to date have no substantiation (because logically they cannot be substantiated) and have not been removed, emphasis mine:
* When this is pointed out, there is usually push-back from a transgender editor or an editor who agrees with labeling these people as TERFs.
* When editors say that calling people TERFs or transphobic in Wikipedia's voice are WP:WIKIVOICE and WP:LABEL violations, transgender editors or other editors who agree with labeling these people as TERFs or transphobic say that the sourcing for the "TERF" or "transphobic" wording is strong. 
* When this is pointed out, transgender editors or other editors say the the opposing side has less weight and they prioritize American sources over British sources because they say that TERF ideology is stronger in Britain. 
I think this sets an interesting precedent for Wikipedia, especially if in practice nobody is prepared to take action to remove or correct unsourced claims about all transgender Wikipedians. Anyone care to correct me if I've got the wrong end of the stick about what is meant by these words? I believe this is very similar to what a person would write if they are promoting a "trans ideology" exists for all trans people, similar to how most proponents of a "gay agenda" honestly believe there is a conspiracy between all homosexuals.
As a courtesy: .
Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP/N use of description "trans-exclusionary radical feminists"