lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emancipation

message: I've replaced a previous version of this article with serious WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, linguistic and other problems (diff) with a stub.  Others may wish to expand this into a coherant overview of "political emancipation" (please cite sources) , or add small paragraphs linking to other appropriate articles; otherwise, feel free to nominate this for deletion. - David Oberst 22:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled section]

message: Hi all, I'm sorry I'm not really sure how to edit wikipedia, but the reference link at the bottom of the page from Syracuse University is broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.16.123.53 (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: Moved from Emancipation of minors where this was included as an invisible note (I don't know who originally added it):
:The wiki page Political_emancipation could use some attention. Currently it is only a stub. Particularly the explanation of the term 'political emancipation' entailing 'equal status of individual citizens in relation to the state, equality before the law, regardless of religion, property, or other “private” characteristics of individual persons' is construed to be an 'opinion' and 'not delivering a neutral point of view.' Does anyone have more expert information on the word 'emancipation' also being used in the political context of establishing (or any step moving towards) equality in light of the law?
--Icarus 23:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved note

message: Political emancipation → Emancipation — This should be a real article —Ewlyahoocom 10:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Greece's ruling party was founded on this motto: "National Independence, Popular Sovereignty, Social Emancipation, Democratic Process." It would be good to know what this phrase means. It might also be good to acknowledge this use of the word in the article.
Spblat (talk) 23:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about "Social Emancipation"? 

message: There are two areas where "emancipation" conflicts. In the law, minors may opt to "emancipate themselves" from a person who needs emancipation rights if they are disabled. The other can occur at a workplace. So, I think this "clash" needs to be mentioned as the entire concept of what emancipation is and means has been distorted throughout history. Rights are somehow reduced rather than increased in some instances which isn't making sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.44.1.7 (talk) 05:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teen Minor and Disabled Parent and African American vs Disabled in Workplace 

message: Hi all, I believe there is a severe lack of citations for this article hence I have added a message. Sv.oles (talk) 07:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Voorhees High School

message: What is the best way to prove a notable alumnus or alumna is from this school? Are yearbooks sufficient (but how to cite)? Local articles listing the student's on honor roll (but what if student wasn't on honor roll)? Adhanali (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I have assessed this article as C-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion
shirulashem (talk) 20:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments
Talk:Lone Star Showdown trophy

message: Does the trophy really need an article about it?  It's not very historic as the showdown only started 3 years ago.  Corpx 06:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the same too...Blueag9\talk 01:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't feel strongly about it, but the reason it was seperate originally is because it was linked from a list of college football rivalry trophies.  My slight preference would be to leave them separate, but I will go along with the merge if that is still what others want to do. Johntex\talk 01:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are others listed in that category, such as South's Oldest Rivalry, that are more analogous to the Lone Star Showdown article. — Bellhalla 19:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Madison Memorial Building

message: I added a small note about the building's role in the 2021 storming of the Capitol. The language will need to be updated if the page title and wording changes (storming to attack, rioters to terrorists, etc.). It is currently not known if rioters actually entered the building or if the evacuation was proactive, will need to update as the news develops. Verumregium (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on building role in 2021 storming of the Capitol
Talk:Niño Valdés

message: According to BoxingWear, I killed information when I made my edits. As anyone can plainly see by looking at the two versions, I killed no information. I merely cleaned up the writing and removed redundant information. For those who cannot see it, however, let me spell it out.
*I removed this sentence from the first paragraph: “He was considered top opponent for Rocky, but lost to Archie Moore 15/15 UD on May 2 1955.” One, this is poorly written. Two, the same information is contained in the main paragraph. Valdez’s loss to Moore is talked about in context of his whole career.
* I changed this some: “There was talk that if he would have won that bout, he would have fought Marciano on January 2 in Miami Beach, FL. A possible title bout against Rock was a possibility in June of 1956 in Cuba.” I left the first sentence but took off the date and took out the second sentence.  One, the second sentence is written poorly – “a possible title bout was a possibility”? – and it conflicts with the sentence before. If a title bout was a possibility in June in Miami, how could the same bout be a possibility in June in Cuba?  So I removed the confusion and simply said that a title bout was a possibility.
*Futhermore, BoxingWear took out this info: "He continued boxing, losing to heavyweight contenders Zora Folley, Eddie Machen, and Sonny Liston. After his last bout, a win over contender Brian London in 1959, he retired." And he accuses me of "killing tons of info."
For this, BoxingWear says that it was “near vandalism.”  MKil 17:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fairly simple to check. Instead of reverting every edit I make, just compare the two versions of our edits and then insert any information you think I "killed."  By just reverting my edits, you remove a lot of corrections on mis-spellings, removal of redundant information, etc.  MKil 17:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Near vandalism?"
Talk:Laws (dialogue)

message: The comment about homosexuality in the article: I think it is inaccurate to say that  Plato "supports" it in the Symposium and the Phaedrus because he has characters who are engaged in ephebophilia.  Anacreon 19:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality in the Laws 

message: « It is similar in that both dialogues concern the making of a city in speech, but different in that the one city is ideal, and the other a real, practical city. The city of the Laws is described as "second best" as opposed to the city of the Republic. »
This is a mistake : the city of the Republic is a copy of an « ideal », not an ideal (for Plato, it's always impossible to create a city identical with the life of gods) ; in The Laws, the city is a copy too, and the first best city isn't the city of Republic, but the city of gods and their childrens. Théétète (talk) 15:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rpublic vs. The Laws 

message: I noticed that the article claims the following: "The text is noteworthy as Plato's only undisputed dialogue not to feature Socrates."
But this is not quite right. What about the Statesman and the Sophist? Neither dialogue features Socrates as the primary leader of discussion. And current scholarship does not deem these dialogues as having authenticity issues. The wiki pages of the dialogues I am referring to also don't mention any authenticity problems, so in order to keep wiki pages consistent on Plato, we either need to modify the Statesman and Sophist pages or we need to slightly modify this page. Those dialogues may have been disputed at one point, due to the efforts of Schleiermacher in the 1830's. Over 3/4 of the dialogues were cast into doubt during this time, including the Apology, but since then the majority of the dialogues he cast aspersions over have recovered their status as authentic. So I guess what I mean to say, is that perhaps we can take out the sentence I quoted, because it involves the page in discussion that I don't think it needs to be in. Other than that, I think the page looks great. Any thoughts? --Phaenarete (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think by "feature," the article means that he does not appear at all, rather than that he does not play a starring role. RJC TalkContribs 17:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athenian Stranger 

message: I want to add a piece concerning Plato's usage of the word nome; nomoi and nomes. The way he uses the words in his 'nomoi' (translated as the laws) is worth a mention. I am not sure if I should place that here, or create a new page. I am hoping for suggestions. --Fan Singh Long (talk) 08:41, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source to point to that already makes the argument? RJC TalkContribs 15:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plato and Ancient Greece

message: siri 174.95.172.154 (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  सकुएरेड
Category talk:PBS network affiliates

message: This category is a redirect to :Category:PBS member stations, as PBS stations are not called affiliates, they are member stations.  Problem is, categories are not supposed to be using article redirects.  Therefore, I corrected it to use , not #redirect :category:PBS member stations.  The template is the more correct and proper way, I believe.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belgium

message: Hello All, currently the article about the Arrondissement of Halle-Vilvoorde is one of the oldest unreferenced articles on the site. If anyone would be able to take a look at the article and either add sources or clean it up it would be much appreciated. Tooncool64 (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Arrondissement of Halle-Vilvoorde]] unreferenced article. 

message: What is the difference between the 'Article creation drive' and 'Requests' section? It is somewhat confusing. Maybe it is better to merge them? Kyuuseishu (talk) 00:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request sections? 

message: Hello, I wrote an article about the Belgian artist Emmanuel Viérin, it has been two months now and it has still not been published. What can I do to make the process successful. I have made all the requested additions and modifications. Thank you.
Draft:Emmanuel Viérin Mathtech (talk) 13:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmanuel Viérin 

message: I recently noticed List of members of the Council of the German Cultural Community, 1978–1981 is supposed to be a list, but is not. This goes for the next three I checked, too. I'd appreciate it if someone could find a better way than my adding "supposed to be" between "this" and "is a list" for each one (maybe by adding a list of members). If you're not up to it, perhaps you know who is. Any bit helps. InedibleHulk (talk) 07:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of members of the Council of the German-speaking Community
Talk:Huntington, Oregon

message: Here's a source for the history: http://bakercounty.net/huntington/ . This appears to be a personal site, not an official site--I don't know where they got the info. I'm removing the word "unfortunate" from in front of "emigrants"...seems POV but perhaps that is my bias. Katr67 22:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding the sources, but as you can see, several of the facts are a direct copy and paste from the above site, which was then used as the source. I'd really like to see another source for this material (and see it rewritten as well), as I'm not sure the above source is reliable. Also, that Oregon Cities website uses info directly copied and pasted from Oregon Geographic Names, and in fact some of the parts of the article are in turn copied exactly from Oregon Cities. Katr67 05:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A few notes about the sources in this article
Template talk:Main inter-regional railway lines in Great Britain

message: I hope this doesn't overcomplicate things but shouldn't other regional main lines be added? They count as being part of the British system so they would be British main lines. They could be split into England, Scotland and Wales. Simply south 22:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This template is for the national/really big mainlines. There are templates for each regions already. Our Phellap 22:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Editors may be interested in the debate currently ongoing at Template talk:Railway lines in South-East England over the layout, classification and geographical scope of these templates. Pickle 16:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout and standards of these templates

message: Is this really, seriously and truly a "Classic" main line???  Can someone name me a named train that uses this route (apart from the 'Cheltenham Flyer', which is really a GWR train) that can sit alongside the Royal Scot, the Flying Scotsman, the Cornish Riviera Express or the Master Cutler ... I doubt it!!! Can I make a case for removing this faux main line.Canterberry 21:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross Country Route
Talk:Flemish Canadians

message: I hate to do this to the only name, but does anyone actually have a source that Emily VanCamp is Flemish-Canadian? Mad Jack 22:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We do not list by last names. We need a source that Emily VanCamp is Flemish. Mad Jack 17:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 24, 2006

message: May want to remove some of the blank space between </div> and "A binary star system ...." The paragraph is not beginning at the top of the page right now. -- 199.71.174.100 22:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed. Raul654 00:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Someone made a gross error in Geometry. The Featured Article entry says: 
"If binaries happen to orbit in a plane perpendicular to our line of sight, it is possible for them to eclipse each other; ..."
which is wrong: if that were tne case, we would never see them eclipsing each other, as any one of the angles Star1-Star2- Earth would always be a right angle (90°).
On the other hand, the actual featured article (Binary star) says: 
"If binaries happen to orbit in a plane containing our line of sight..." which is correct.
Regards, AVM 17:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think you're right.  Thanks, I've corrected it.--Pharos 18:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALERT: Geometry Mistake
Talk:Industrial Drive (Adrian, Michigan)

message: I do not understand what this article is about.--Anthony.bradbury 22:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That should no longer be a problem! Ten Pound Hammer • (((Actions • Words))) 04:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: This unsigned trunkline has no number. It is internally designated as Connector 34. The list cited also shows that CONN M-13 is internally designated Connector 14 and the Capitol Loop is Connector 81. Those numbers are related to the sequence they were numbered. Imzadi1979 01:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, a minor note:  is a better source to link to. Now, it doesn't look to me like the numbers were assigned in order, once you get past 23. 34 connects to M-34, 44 to M-44, 58 to M-58, 96 to I-96, and 104 to M-104. (I don't know why they chose 81.) A merge to M-34 makes perfect sense to me. What more can you say about it? --NE2 06:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... the lists are nearly identical to me. Calling it Connector 34 and CONN M-34 are diferent in MI. All state highway designations in MI use M-# unless they are 1) Interstates, 2) U.S. Highways, 3) Business connections/bannered highways related to #1 or #2 or 4) unsigned/unassigned highways. Industrial Dr. has an internal reference used by MDOT as Connector 34. Did they pick that the line up with M-34, possibly, but it isn't Connector M-34. The wording used previous was at least wrong on that account, and a proper discussion to reach consensus about a redirect/merg, as you now have done is proper. Thank you. Imzadi1979 07:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that it's not Connector M-34. However, it is a connection to M-34, and doesn't need its own article. --NE2 07:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent redirect
Talk:Walter Felsenstein

message: This is not clear if it is Bartok's opera, Dukas' od Offenbach's Bluebeard??? (meladina 22:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks -- Offenbach.  It's fixed.  Fireplace 23:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Kzin

message: Should probably have a section on pronunciation. I've heard "zinn" and "k'zinn"; "g-zinn" (with the Arabic gutteral g/q/k) and "xha-zinn" with the Slavic aspirated H are also possible. How does Niven pronounce it? 72.183.155.139 (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation 

message: According to the original description of the kzinti, they do not have a spine, their torso is a flexible cage of struts. Bonnie Dalzell's illustration: http://www.sloan3d.com/covers/kzinskel.jpg -- Resuna (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  spine 

message: Is it known how kzinti names are chosen, e.g. do kzinti entitled to use a name get to choose the name themselves, or is it assigned to them by a warrior committee, or what?  Is it chosen on the spot (at the time they earn the right to have a name) or ahead of time ("win a few more battles and you'll be known as Bob instead of spaceship-janitor")?  If this info is available it should be mentioned in the article.  Thanks. 67.119.15.30 (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   names 
Talk:Khinalug

message: Actually, the highest village in Azerbaijan is in Kalbajar. But at the current time, it is not inhabited because of the war.--72.60.179.223 01:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Thanks for correction on the spelling Grandmaster, I completly forgot about that most Westerlings would be able to spell it due the x=g thingy. Great edit! Baku87 10:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thats true but we cant be sure about the spelling though, i added a alternative Karabakh 11:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: to user:Parishan  Why you delete the russian artice link? Stop it.Xinaliq.az 21:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was right in deleting it and I deleted it again: The interwiki link to the Russian Wikipedia is already present on the bottom of the article. That's where such links belong to. — N-true 01:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian Article

message: Are there any facts or references supporting 5k years of history? The article mentions only two mosques from 12th and 15th century.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.114.248.33 (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I removed the obscure sentence which said that although Khinalig people are Azerbaijani citizens, they're different (from what?) ethnicity. Azerbaijani citizenship and constitution do not define belonging by ethnicity. Atabəy (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship vs. ethnicity

message: This article is abundant with phrases which leave the reader with the impression that it is a  travel guide rather than an article on Khinalug itself. Also, what do phrases like "Archaeological research also will help to give answers to many questions...", etc., mean in the context? Which questions will be answered? And then there are other similar phrases which clearly demonstrate a low level of  competence. For example: "Rasul Rza used to compare these houses with a whole range of eagle´s nest." A link to the Rasul Rza article would be helpful, since this writer, who held the post of the Chairman of the Writers´ Union of the Azerbaijan SSR, might not be very well-known to a reader without knowledge of Azerbaijani/Soviet literature. And phrases such as "The local people say that honey is a remedy to cure 70 diseases" or "People say that this land is linked to Noah"... You know, a certain Chechen website claims that the term Нохчийчоь = Noxçiyçö means "The land of Prophet Noah´s grandsons"... but how is this statement relevant in the context? And finally, the assertion that the villagers have seen a snowman in 1988 is surely interesting but the cited source lacks such an assertion. Food for thought indeed. Best regards,--89.173.227.64 (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a travel guide or a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral]] encyclopedia article? 

message: If you look at Khinalug on open source topo maps, you see that the village center is only 2170 meters above sea level. What is this 2350 m referring to — the highest shepherd hut?? Richard Tbilisi (talk) 11:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubts about the altitude of Khinalug
Talk:Chromium(II) oxide

message: This page has an improper name, it should be merged into Chromium(IV) oxide (chromium dioxide IS chromium(IV) oxide, not chromium(II) oxide)!!  --Dirk Beetstra T C 23:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I'll go ahead and merge. —Keenan Pepper 03:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Don't merge quite yet. The formulas are different.  --75.70.206.174 15:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait! 

message: According to the article on copper chromite chromate ions may be reduced to CrO by ammonium ions when (NH4)2Cu(CrO4)2 is heated. This, however, seems somewhat unlikely given the sensitive nature of CrO and should not be believed without confirmation. 150.227.15.253 (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation
Talk:John B. Quigley

message: I think a strong case can be made that the article about "John Quigley (academic)" should be about the University of California academic who died in 2012:
: "During his career he produced fourteen books and over 150 scholarly articles."
and 
:" He advised over twenty research and governmental agencies including the World Bank, General Accounting Office, Urban Institute, Federal Home Loan Bank Board, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and institutions in Indonesia, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, and China. ...  He was elected a fellow of the Homer Hoyt Institute in 1992 and the Regional Science Association in 2004. He was president of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association from 1996 to 1998, President of the Western Regional Science Association from 1998 to 2000, and President of the North American Regional Science Council from 2009 to 2010."
(From http://gspp.berkeley.edu/news-events/quigleyObit.html)  
That would require moving the existing article to, say, John B. Quigley, which is currently a redirect. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 00:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prominent academic 
Talk:MacArthur Causeway

message: The "Bridge Information" box in this article is very misleading, because it refers to a construction project that was completed in 1997, but the Macarthur Causeway has existed since the 1920's.  (See photographic evidence, showing the causeway in 1927.)  The Macarthur was previously called the "county causeway" and was renamed after WWII.  This article gives the impression that the bridge is new and was completed in 1997. (Sobesurfski 23:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not constructed in 1997

message: The "Robert Daniels" referred to in the "Lighting Design" section is not the same "Robert Daniels" (a boxer) to whom the hyperlink points. 71.240.159.90 (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Daniels