lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gombe State

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
"Gombe, usually referred to as Gombe State" -> that is incorrect.  Gombe State is usually called Gombe State because its name is Gombe State.  Las Vegas is sometimes called simply Vegas, but it's name always was and always will be Las Vegas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.5.90 (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:CX-516

message: This is listed as CX-516 as oppossed to CX516, while CX717 is listed as such, and not as CX-717.  I do not know which is correct, or if the hyphen is different between them, but it would be nice if an expert could look into it.
IUPAC Name added.--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 15:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Great Lakes Valley Conference navbox

message: I assume you're going to create a :Category:Great Lakes Valley Conference to get rid of all the red links you're making on the college pages? --Dual Freq 23:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There you go. That was about as hard as making your comment.—Lazytiger 00:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I apologize; I wasn't assuming you're an idiot, I was only trying to illustrate that this is Wikipedia, where the motto is "Be Bold." You saw a need for category that hadn't been made, so make it.—Lazytiger 01:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No Category
Talk:Average and over (hands lost)

message: Someone should make the subject clearer. It is pretty opaque right now. Lou Sander 02:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten it, and at least it makes some sense now. I don't know what the "(hands lost)" has to do with anything, though. The article should probably be renamed to delete it, but I don't know enough about the subject to be confident in doing that myself. Lou Sander 12:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Is This Article About?
Template talk:Areas of Dundee

message: This list of places seems to a list of council wards in Dundee. Wouldn't it be better to use the more common names/areas rather than the arbitary electorial ones. I mean no one refers to the area as riverside. It would be far better to have it listed as west-end. And Brackens. Surely this should be St Mary's
:Right I've changed the template a fair bit. I've added a few areas and removed or renamed ones that only exist as names for electorial wards. Still not too sure about Balfield, Balgillo, Bowbridge, Longhaugh - are these areas actually known by these names? Ydam 15:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As Balgillo and Barnhill are parts of Broughty Ferry I have moved them in the template so as to better reflect this. Dunarc (talk) 23:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broughty Ferry
Talk:Aaron's sign

message: there is no such thing as "chronic appendicitis" (all acute appendicites rupture well before developing into a "chronic" state) so this article cannot be accurate
medical-dictionary.com defines "Aaron's sign" as: In acute appendicitis, a referred pain or feeling of distress in the epigastrium or precordial region on continuous firm pressure over McBurney's point.
Removed epigastrium and replaced it with lower right quadrant. McBurney's point is certainly not located in the epigastrium because it is well below the subcostal plane.  Indeed, it is well below the transumbilical plane.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.227.58 (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Category talk:People of Praise

message: I removed this category from the page.  If you wish to put People of Praise into this category, then please do so with the main article not this, the category of pages involved with this article.  I am not going to apply the category to the main article, as I don't think POP really meets the definition for "denomination" - but if you wish to apply it to the main article, I will not revert changes, although I have a feeling that someone from the organization will.  Anyways, thanks, zappa.jake (talk) 23:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't notice the discussion pages. I apologize.  -- ProveIt (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, glad we got it worked out.  -zappa.jake (talk) 22:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Christian denominations of North America|Christian denominations of North America]]

message: Recently, Covington placed Category: People of Praise in the category Christian denominations of North America.  I saw the edit and reverted it, leaving an explanation on POP's talk page.  Covington did not revert my change, and I'm guessing he read my explanation.  You however, saw my change, and unreverted it, leaving an edit summary of "rv, vandalism".  I ask that you please read POP's talk page before you label my edit as vandalism or revert my changes.  Also, Danbold has reverted your changes, and I'm sure he would back my explanation on the talk page.  Anyways, I ask you to please not add the category on for a third time, and to read my explanation.  Thank you, zappa.jake (talk) 20:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't notice the discussion pages. I apologize.  -- ProveIt (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, glad we got it worked out.  -zappa.jake (talk) 22:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: From [[User talk:ProveIt|Provelt's talk page]]
Talk:GAIT (wireless)

message: TDMA says that TDMA is a technique, not a protocol.  In this article, is TDMA used to mean D-AMPS? -- Beland 23:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of terminology
Talk:Beating of Frank Jude Jr.

message: This phrase needs disambiguation: " ... as well as Jon Bartlett's wife, a former Milwaukee police officer, and the City of Milwaukee."
Does the above refer to two entities (Jon Barlett's wife, herself a former Milwaukee police officer, and the City of Milwaukee)?
Or three entities (Bartlett's wife, an unnamed former Milwaukee police officer, and the City of Miwaukee)?
Karl gregory jones (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Disambiguation
Talk:Param Vir

message: Could do with being rewritten: the whole article is taken from his website. Matve 23:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An earlier version of the article does not have the copyright problem and has been substitued back replacing the biography taken from his site. -- Whpq 16:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Holmes v. South Carolina

message: i, yakbasser, was present when this case was argued before the supreme cout 
Yakbasser 23:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! Got a picture of the justices at work? ++Lar: t/c 14:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: This article is a remarkable piece of work and worthy of showcasing for editing prowess. It's just not very exciting! ++Lar: t/c 14:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FA candidate then?  ; )  Postdlf 18:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And thank you for the glowing comments...  Postdlf 18:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome and who knows, it might get picked... as for FA? Maybe... I'm no expert. GA certainly. ++Lar: t/c 19:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DYK Nom

message: I was wondering what happened after the supreme court case, and found that the defendant plead guilty right before the third trial. https://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/article12226619.html 2603:3012:571:6000:B8EB:9869:F167:C311 (talk) 19:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath
Talk:The Mandrake

message: I've changed date that this play was written to 1518 (date given in chronology of the Penguin Classics edition of the Prince), but I don't know when it was first printed.  According to my source it was performed in Venice in 1525, but Machiavelli was revising it again by 1526.  Can anyone verify that 1524 was the date it was first printed?
--SoniaUK 23:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Machiavelli didn't actually plot against the medici. he was just accused of doing so, then some years later he was allowed back by the medici. I'm a languages and literatures student in the Gabriele D'Annunzio University, Pescara, Italy. --87.6.180.228 16:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Written between 1504 and 1518 and first performed in 1518, the play dramatizes the principles from The Prince; Callimaco is La Mandragola's prince, his actions are in the pursuit of happiness at the expense of others...
Anyone who can write this hasn't read The Prince.  Firstly, he says in both The Prince and The Discourses that a sure way for a prince to get in serious trouble is to mess with the property or women of his subjects, which he supports with numerous examples such as Virginia and the Decemvirs, the suicide of Lucretia and the end of the Tarquin dynasty, and the assassination of Philip of Macedon.  Secondly, there is nothing in Macchiavelli that espouses pursuit of happiness at the expense of others as a principle to be followed by princes.  Rather, the principle is that the welfare of a state is sometimes better served by immoral actions. Shrikeangel (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted all of the Original Research. Softlavender (talk) 04:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dramatizes the principles from the Prince?! 
Talk:Sujiatun, Shenyang

message: Epoch Times account is suspect:
- There were two US government investigations. One by the State Dept, another by Africa, Global HR & IO Subcommittee. The investigations started 2nd week of March, ended on the 3/21 consular visit.
Epoch's claim that "Auschwitz" can vanish into thin air in 5 days is science fiction.
- The hospital Epoch Times accused is a joint venture with a company affaliated with the Malaysian government:
http://crc.gov.my/clinicalTrial/documents/Proposal/TCM_Stroke%20TrialProtocol%20synopsis.pdf
I've never heard of death camp advertising for foreign investment.
Also, here's a news report of Harry Wu from Laogai Research Foundation, casting doubt on Falun Gong's claim:
http://www.canadianchristianity.com/cgi-bin/bc.cgi?bc/bccn/0606/07chinese
"Wu adds: "The Falun Gong practitioners say, 'We believe this is true because Chinese communism is a barbaric, evil system. They will do anything.' So the conclusion is: they did it. The evidence? Today, not enough."
----
I donno if this is worth mentioning, as of August 10, 2006, but no respectable news agency have reported this concentration camp "news", and searching the websites for Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch returned no results for the term "Sujiatun".
--Shaoquan 05:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Time Gal

message: I don't think this game has blood, gore, and nudity at all! Can anyone show me some soures and prove this????? (LonerXL (talk) 01:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blood, gore, nudity

message: Reika dosen't have family name in this game. "kirishima" is not her family name.
"Reika Kirishima" is character from shooting game "shikigami-no-shiro".
But she is  a parody character　of Reika in TIME GAL.They are not the same person. 
And,in original version,Reika's name is written in katakana.→[レイカ]  It is not written in kanji
I am japanese and I like this game very much!
so,I want tell you this information.
Thank you!
--153.169.30.37 (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: about her name  
Talk:The Thing (video game)

message: I've taken out the entire detailed plot description as per WP:NOT:
Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.
:Marasmusine 08:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any way the article could be expanded? Seems a bit threadbare now. DarkSaber2k 10:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: A brief plot synposis, any other information from sources; The only source I have on hand is Edge magazine, which may have a preview article with some interesting development tidbits. I'll take a look. Marasmusine 12:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: And a gameplay section. Marasmusine 12:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More removal

message: Any news on wether it will be re-released alongside the 2011 prequel?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.247.238.46 (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Current events
Talk:Practical reason

message: :An example would be calling all hospitals to look for your missing child, but not checking morgues, as finding his corpse would be 'counter-productive.'
I love the TABOO of this sentence. That is what some don't like about wikipedia, but the fact of the matter is: the example is very good. thanks also for the quote by snepscheut.--213.101.253.160 00:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I found this interesting as well, but there is no citation within the philosophy link. Unfortunately, the person that added this information some years ago was an IP address, so I cannot ask them for a citation (and having trouble finding something useful on Google Scholar myself). If anyone reading this can put a good citation to that passage, please do. Evud (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

text: It also appears that the same User IP created the page called Realism Theory, and it is lacking in citations as well. Evud (talk) 13:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cognitive Research
Talk:Victory Day

message: "fact" (or "citation needed") are inappropriate tags. Are you really suggesting that the actual designation of this date requires a citation? That's a little too pedantic considering there's a "see also" link to V-E Day immediately before the paragraph. Your other point, about the date of signing, is incorrect. While the surrender document was signed on 7 May at Rheims, it did not enter into force until 23:01 CET on 8 May, hence the choice of the date. Simishag 00:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. People should check out "Main article: Victory in Europe Day, Victory Day (Eastern Europe)  if they want details. Citations are not necessary at all on this page. -- PFHLai 00:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Victory Day marks the end of World War II in Europe, specfically the capitulation of Nazi forces to the Allies (the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States and other principal Allied nations) on May 8, 1945. It is celebrated in the successor states to the Soviet Union on May 9, because when the German Instrument of Surrender actually entered into force (May 8, 1945 at 23:01 CET), it was already May 9 in the USSR and Eastern Europe. The US and most western European countries mark Victory in Europe Day on May 8
The date in the UK of the surrender was 7 May, the time when hostilities ended was the 00001 9 May  because the UK was on BDST (UCT+2). Was Germany on CET or Central European Summer Time? If Germany was on CEST then in was the same time in Germany.
How does the USA mark VE Day? Which western European countries mark VE Day? --Philip Baird Shearer 06:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: V-E Day on May 8/9

message: A  day  without war , a day will of peace.
A  day  with pleasure without crises.
A  day not a  mere,all time will say-
Evryone enjoy a victory day. Nighat Sultana Surovi (talk) 17:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  victory day
Talk:Alfred A. Cunningham

message: Who is Smith.  There are 2 references in the article to Smith, but no description of him.
134.187.163.211 (talk) 22:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  and Smith 

message: "Between October 1912 and July 1913, Cunningham made some 400 flights in the Curtiss B-1,"
There was NO "Curtiss" B-1 in this time period.  The only Curtiss B-1 "Robin" model was introduced in 1928.  Early USN flying boats were designated A-1 thru A-4  (see Joe Baugher's website   and Aerofiles.com ).  The Wright B-1 was available at this time period.  So Cunningham either logged time in a "Wright" B-1  or Curtiss "A-1"  (or both), but NOT in a "Curtiss B-1".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chhamilton3 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper Aircraft  Description 
Talk:Bad Girl McGuire (Lizzie McGuire episode)

message: Merge it, please. Retinarow 00:24, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I favor that call. - TheDJ (talk • contribs) 09:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged into List of Lizzie McGuire episodes. MakeRocketGoNow 19:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:SpyHunter

message: why does this sound like a crappy amatur review? 82.42.205.93 19:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: reverted an edit on reviews that was unsourced and spelled poorly. --RichardMills65 (talk) 01:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert  

message: There is also a malware program called Spyhunter
The ironic thing: It pretends to remobve maleare, but is malware itself.
Should be mentioned
http://praxistipps.chip.de/spy-hunter-entfernen-so-gehts_9624
188.110.185.211 (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware
Talk:Weather stick

message: Just heard it so described on BBC Radio 4 - "Gardeners' Question time". Can a radio programme be a valid citation ?
I guess you can hear it for a week on the 'Listen Again' service, but I don't think they transcribe it onto a web-page.
Up=happy, down=sad, I guess !
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  aka Willy Stick
Talk:Seán Kelly (Irish politician)

message: Who was the GAA President before Seán Kelly?
Frainc 01:45 17 May
:Fixed (Gnevin 14:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessor 
Talk:The New York Times Magazine

message: We should definitely merge this. Skinnyweed 00:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but before anyone does, do make sure to click on the What links here link in the toolbox of the article page.  Given the number of links to this article, it needs expansion more than it needs merging.  VulcanOfWalden 22:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The entire controversy section has issues with NPOV and needs to be edited, at least for language.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.158.223.4 (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: I suggest add a contributors section.-— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nukeless (talk • contribs) 09:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributors 

message: I agree that the article should have a contributors section, if for no other reason that the sentences about Lester Markel as editor likely contains an error.  Tolstoy died in 1910, and if Markel was editor beginning in the 1920s, Tolstoy should not be listed as a contributor under Markel's editorship.
--APWebber (talk) 16:17, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributors and Lester Markel as Editor

message: Looking at the Times archive, I noticed that what is now the "New York Times Magazine" was once the "New York Times Magazine Section."  Does anyone know when this renaming took place? --dedrick (talk) 00:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magazine Section vs Magazine
Talk:WWE Bad Blood

message: Where did somebody get that image? It is not the dvd cover to BB 2004 I have the dvd its HBK and HHH. I dont know how to change it can someone help me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wrestlinglover420 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There may have been more than one cover. Amazon does have that listed as the DVD cover: . TJ Spyke 00:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004

message: Spike, The source you gave stating that it wasn't on the line wasn't an actual link. And the source I gave  says that it was on the line. Lex94 22:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that the author of that column is mistaken because that is the first time I have ever heard anybody say that the title was on the line. The link I provided is from a site where a guy goes back and reviews old WWF PPV's using VHS tapes and DVDs of the events. From the link I provided (): "Dok Hendrix interviews Shawn Michaels and he brings the funny by sarcastically expressing relief that his newly won European title isn’t on the line in this match.". WWE doesn't mention the title in their feature on Michaels overcoming the odds , prowrestlinghistory.com doesn't mention the title in their results for the show , even OWW doesn't mention the title in their results section: . TJ Spyke 23:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

text: No problem. If you had been right, I would have had no problem admitting that I was wrong. TJ Spyke 23:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: European Championship

message: Someone messed up the article. It needs to be fixed. I've got no idea how to do it.Dohvahkiin (talk) 01:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page is messed up. 

message: the event was set for 2017 TheBigBoss3900 (talk) 06:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2017
Talk:Monogatari

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:Bakemonogatari -- 65.93.15.213 (talk) 04:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Monogatari Series}}"

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:Monogatari (novel series) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Monogatari series}}"

message: naming of various things monogatari is up for discussion, see Talk:Bakemonogatari -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Monogatari"
Talk:Suematsu Kenchō

message: Suyematz Kenchio, as in "The Literature of Japan" (Epiphanius Wilson, Books for Libraries Press, 1971, ISBN 10: 0836982274 / 0-8369-8227-4, ISBN 13: 9780836982275) - 131.202.91.102 (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate spelling 
Talk:Minamoto clan

message: There has to be a better way to list the members of this family / clan. -Kode 04:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm working on getting family trees scanned out of a public domain book. But my scanner isn't working right now. LordAmeth 11:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added the family tree, scanned from Edmond Papinot's "Historical and geographical dictionary of Japan", published originally in 1910 and thus public domain material. It's not the greatest, but I hope it prettier than what we had before. I've commented out what we had before rather than deleting it, so that if anyone wants to re-add it, or use it some other way, they still can easily. LordAmeth 12:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Member List 

message: If a man was a general of the imperial army, does that make them a member of the imperial clan?  MicronesianHelper2016 (talk) 14:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You sound like you might know a little more than I. On the other hand, you are more likely to know less, bcz your question immediately inspires in me questions you seem not to have considered, and I would consider it unreasonable to seek more information on why you consider it plausible, bcz most societies make extremely strong assumptions about compatibility of roles, and the moreso in non-nomadic societies, and still more yet those with bushido-style cultures. I don't bet money, but if I did, I think I'd be wisest if I tried to take yours, based on my presumption that you'd accept odds that I'd be justly confident were  grossly disadvantageous to you. Instead, your free answer is "Keep y'r money in yer pocket, kid." I expect nobles were generals, but even the rank of field marshal would soil the dignity of a member of that clan. The imperial clan most likely learned military theory, and skills, but only to ensure themselves a good chance of identifying the most qualified of high officers on one hand, and personal body-guards on the other, without having to rely on the counsel of likely sycophant.--JerzyA (talk) 02:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperial Generals
Talk:Taira clan

message: We draw an inference here that the royal lineages from Izumo, downstream of Ashinazuchi, father of Kushi Inada Hime, were possibly of the Hun or Turkic-Xiongnu Ashina royal clans from the continent: 32genDietrich (talk) 17:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sakhalin & Siberian Xiongnu