lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jake Locker

message: For some reason, the personal life section of this page has quite a bit of what seems like unnecessary information about Locker's family, from what his grandparents did to what his cousin is up to. I don't see any real justification with most of these mentions as to why they're relevant to the subject of Jake Locker himself, nor do most of them seem to live up to notability standards on their own. Unless folks chime in over the next few days to disagree, which is fine, I'm going to remove the information. Of course, if someone in the future wants to create new articles for these family members, they're welcome to add links to those articles from here. Sevey13 (talk) 04:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superfluous Family Info? 

message: If you had choice to come back in the NFL would you do your Career all over again what Team would draft you in NFL draft 2011-Trainsfer over into -2022 NFL Draft class would you like if the San Antonio Giants draft you instead of the Tennessee Titans what do you think I can coach you to do better what do you yes or no 107.138.214.49 (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dear. Jake locker
Talk:Jason Horn

message: Slimmed down, wiser Horn, Journal and Courier, November 11, 1995
Rest In Pieces: Michigan defensive linean Jaon Horn buries quarterbacks and critics, The Michigan Daily, October 16, 1995 part 1/ part 2
Michigan defensive lineman Jason Horn has ... Deep roots: Left Indiana farm for Ann Arbor, but he feels growing urge to return, Detroit Free Press, November 9, 1995, part 1/part 2
U-M' Farm All-America plows through offenses, Detroit Free Press, September 18, 1995  here
https://www.newspapers.com/image/99253776/?terms=horn%20%22jason%20horn%22&match=1
Athlete of the Week, The Michigan Daily, September 18, 1995 here
AP All-Americans, Dec 7, 1995
Cbl62 (talk) 01:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Talk:Jeff Ireland

message: Take a look at UNC Football Player Durell Mapp Website lets get him into the NFL www.durellmapp.com Hard work pays off  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.26.230.63 (talk) 01:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durell Mapp 

message: FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold textFIRE JEFF IRELANDBold textFIRE JEFF IRELANDBold textFIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
FIRE JEFF IRELANDBold text
Bananaman123123123123123 (talk) 03:25, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. —C.Fred (talk) 03:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 20 March 2012 
Talk:Jerry DePoyster

message: Jerry DePoyster played in 27 games for the Raiders in 1971 and 1972, but only once against the New York Jets.  The Jets scored one touchdown (along with 3 field goals) during their December 11, 1972 battle with the Raiders in Oakland, which the Raiders won 24-16.  That touchdown was not on a 13 yard punt return.  It wasn't on special teams at all: Joe Namath threw a 49 yard pass to Rich Caster.
However, in the 1972 season opener against the Pittsburgh Steelers, DePoyster did have a punt blocked and returned 5 yards for a touchdown.
Timothy Horrigan (talk) 04:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Slight Problem with the Amusing Anecdote about the 11-Yard Punt
Talk:Mainstream

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mainstream religion and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream religion until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream religion" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mainstream fiction and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream fiction until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream fiction" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mainstream audience and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream audience until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream audience" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mainstream market and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream market until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream market" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mainstream (terminology) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream (terminology) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream (terminology)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tully Jensen

message: Food Stamp recipient?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Astiger123 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  values 
Talk:Handley Page Gugnunc

message: Hello, can I suggest adding this link as a reference for the aircraft being on display in Mathematics: The Winton Gallery at the Science Museum in Londonhttps://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co536042/handley-page-h-p-39-gugnunc-aeroplane-aeroplane.
There is also further information about this aircraft available here which could provide a good external link https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/mathematics-and-aviation-handley-page-gugnunc
Curiosity19 (talk) 16:07, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Request edit template added. TSventon (talk) 11:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Miss International 2008

message: Well, Globalbeauties is not a serious reference. Is a fan page!
Priscila Perales told about Miss International 2008 in Macau, and i put the video like reference. I don't know wich is your criteria for delete this.
Alex Duilius (talk) 07:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Miss International in Macau
Talk:Burya

message: Was there also a concept of a maned version..with a pilot on board, as reuseable spacecraft? 178.197.231.97 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also a version as maned space craft? 
Talk:McDonnell 119

message: This aircraft is rumored on the internet to have been the first jet that was not an airliner to receive a transport-category type certificate from the FAA, but I have been unable to find a verifiable published source for this fact. Also, I would love to see the type certificate data sheet for this aircraft, but it doesn't show up in the FAA TCDS database, presumably because the TC was surrendered by MDD or Boeing because they had no interest in helping anyone restore the prototype to flying condition (and I can't say I would blame them). I presume the TCDS is buried in an archive at the FAA or the Library of Congress. I would appreciate any help hunting down these documents. Carguychris (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type certificate 

message: The current version (28 March 2023) states the vertical fin has 45 degrees sweepback. This is correct in one sense (that is the sweepback angle of the leading edge) but incorrect in aircraft-design usage, since "sweepback" is always quoted at the quarter-chordline; on this vertical fin the quarter-chord is closer to 35 degrees of sweep. Lowerunit (talk) 16:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed incorrect 'fact'
Talk:Short Sealand

message: The source of specs was given as the British Aircraft Directory, now not available. I have changed the source to Barnes and James (Putnam), and checked the information available there, but some of the details given in the article are not provided by B&J, e.g. rate of climb and range. I have left them in for now. Perhaps someone else can verify them (or change them if required) from another source, otherwise they'll have to be removed. --TraceyR (talk) 12:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the specs had already been changed to those from:Jackson's British Civil Aircraft 1919-1972:Volume III and the rate of climb, range and height were from there.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications 
Talk:Sukhoi

message: Didn't Sukhoi plan a supersonic bizjet? With Gulfstream, IIRC.  Trekphiler (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Machstream?

message: Doesn't the Sukhoi PAK FA really consist of a few (not quite flying yet) T-50 prototypes that will then be developed into the Sukhoi/HAL FGFA?  (With lots of Chinese, Israeli and French help as usual.) Hcobb (talk) 18:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sukhoi/HAL FGFA vs Sukhoi PAK FA
Talk:Tupolev ANT-14

message: This page: http://cr4.globalspec.com/blogentry/3944/The-Soviet-Union-s-First-All-Metal-Airplane claims that this aircraft is noteworthy because it was the Soviet Union's first all-metal aeroplane, built of non-corrosive steel by the Central Aero-Hydro Dynamic Institute. Should this be mentioned in teh article.  After all, most metal aircraft tended to be made of duraluminium around then... 85.158.139.99 (talk) 08:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Double Eagle II

message: Limited info in article of unsuccessful attempt of Double Eagle Atlantic crossing recycled gondola for the successful Double Eagle II.
*merger and redirect complete as proposed:  User:Peteschulz210 (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of [[Double Eagle (balloon)]] into [[Double Eagle II]][[User:Peteschulz210|User:Peteschulz210]] ([[User talk:Peteschulz210|talk]]) 14:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 

message: Suggest removing "Public Art" header from above.  How is this art?User:Peteschulz210 (talk) 23:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest removing "Public Art" header from above.  How is this art?[[User:Peteschulz210|User:Peteschulz210]] ([[User talk:Peteschulz210|talk]]) 23:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Talk:High-altitude balloon

message: It seems contradictory that in an article of which the first sentence in the lede states "High-altitude balloons are unmanned balloons.." the second subheading is "Manned high-altitude balloons".  Which? Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manned? 

message: Hello. 
It seems to me like the BEAR flights (which are unremarkable) don't belong in the article. If we listed every APRS enabled latex bursting balloon on the page there would be hundreds, and there's no good reason I can see to mention these ones in particular. 
Also - it looks like this page is mainly focused on amateur attempts and being used by all these little un-notable projects to link back to their pages. UKHAS gets a link in the first paragraph? They aren't important enough for that and they have nothing to do with large scale scientific balloons, which the article doesn't talk about very much. 
I'd really like to edit this page because I work with HAB professionally. 
ApoKerbal (talk) 04:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability requirements 

message: Shouldn't it be "pressurized suit"? Someone reverted the edit. I suppose pressurise is British and pressurize American. 212.186.15.63 (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressurised or Pressurized? 

message: Given the previously mentioned excessive unremarkable balloon flights with unremarkable low weights there is also no mention of the flights of record weights or even higher than hobbyist weight measurements. No mention of the weight of manned or unmanned payloads some of which IIRC go as high as 10 tons. Only mentions weights of a few kilos. No mention of the diameter of the largest balloons at operational altitude. No mention of the height of the balloons at launch, and at altitude. No mention of duration of flights or inadequate construction, and material specifications. 2600:8807:5400:28F0:81C2:DCB4:2657:471D (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And do you have any sources? Why didn't you add all this information? CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information
Talk:Project Genetrix

message: The U-2 point needs to be rephrased, as it flew before Genetrix (1st flight was in August 1955). 208.29.184.143 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  U-2  

message: GENETRIX redirects to this article.  For future reference, Genetrix is also the name of a Spanish biotechnology company established in 2001 and based in Madrid.  See: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genetrix
Talk:List of Canadian painters

message: ==Untitled==
A sad list!  Help, please! Joseane (talk) 08:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree with you. This is too medium-specific. Are there lists for Canadian sculptors? One good, well-maintained list should be sufficient. freshacconcispeaktome 01:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wake up Canada

message: A sad list!  Help, please! Joseane (talk) 08:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's the point in having this list and List of Canadian artists? I don't understand the duplication. It would be easier to manage one good list. --Ducio1234 (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree with you. This is too medium-specific. Are there lists for Canadian sculptors? One good, well-maintained list should be sufficient. freshacconcispeaktome 01:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication?

message: Alfred Pellan (1906-1988) Painter, modern art pioneer, founder of Montreal art collective Prisme d'yeux (prism of Eyes), rivals to Les Automatistes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Pellan
Kluscap (talk) 19:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2014 
Talk:Wari-Bateshwar ruins

message: How about renaming the site as "Wari-Bateshwar" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.64.52.185 (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wari-Bateshwar ruins"  or  "Wari-Bateshwar" 

message: The orginal version] of this article uses US spelling (artifact rather than artefact) and the BCE era notation, no discussion appears on the talk page about changing era or spelling, and the current spelling is inconsistent. Considering that although English is not the primary language in Bangladesh, when English is written there, it is usually the British version, I suggest British is the most appropriate variety of English for this article, and the original era notation should be maintained. Thoughts? Jc3s5h (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling and date notation
Talk:General Airborne Transport XCG-16

message: The XCG-16 may have "won" the aerodynamic competition against the CG-13A (while it should have competed against the CG-10A, another of the large glider designs).  However, the CG-13A had been flight tested and was put into in production well before July 31, 1944 while the XCG-16 had not been flight tested because the first XCG-16 was not delivered to CCAAF until August 1944.  The XCG-16 could carry a relatively large weight payload, but the shape of the airfoil limited the size and shape of that payload.  The XCG-16 could not carry a 1 1/2 Ton 6X6 truck as could the CG-13A. The most efficient, long range tow speed of both gliders was 135 m.p.h.  Omitting theoretical speeds, according to Ordinance Department tow test charts, during full load tests, the XCG-16 was not towed above 153 m.p.h. and the CG-13A was not towed above 174 m.p.h.  Thus, any speeds above those numbers are purely theoretical.
Also, Material Command is Materiel Command. --unsigned comment by User:Glidermanone 27 October 2007 (moved from article)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlandmann (talk • contribs) 02:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm presuming you placed this here as unsourced and possibly original research/opinion? Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 04:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I'm sorry that this re-write is not perfect, but it is a thousand percent better than the less than mediocre predecessor. I couldn't let that article stand as it was.Petebutt (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 
Talk:Marie-Charles David de Mayréna

message: The article says "Marie I, died under mysterious circumstances (various reports claim by poisoning, snakebite or as the result of a duel)". Is it justified to put him in the category "murdered royalty"?--Runcorn 19:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stuart Scharf

message: I met Stu Scharf in 1964 in Copenhagen, he was touring with Leonard Cohen who had visited Finland (I was told) as guitar accompanist. He visited a small music club, Purple Door, then situated in a borrowed café at Højbro Plads in Copenhagen, and showed great skills in playing and improvising. He was very modest and very bright and knew all the classics and the (spanish/classic) guitar literature and also had a vast knowledge of jazz standards. I don't know how I can verify the tour-information, but my memory is clear. He stayed with a nice girlfriend (student) who lived at a student-accomodation building and there I visited him and he taught me more about guitar playing - in a few hours.
I think he was a great talent and well-educated and I think it deserves to be mentioned that he at that age (23) was on tour with one of the most famous artists (Cohen) which then (and now) needs excellent musicians to get his message "across the stage" - sorry for my idioms, I will revise this text later. --d-axel (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Early Carreer
Talk:Theosophical Society of the Arya Samaj

message: For starters, what is a theosophical society? What were the core beliefs, goals, actions, etc. of this group? Why is it historically significant? As it stands now, this article should be folded back into Arya_Samaj#The_Arya_Samaj_and_the_Theosophical_SocietyWormcast (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, the article suffers from severe lack of context. your suggestion seems sensible. Docku: What up? 21:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing key elements
Talk:Gribovsky G-11

message: Is that figure of 5.2 rally right, even though it's what the Russian sorce (citable?) says?  Gunston's book on Russian aircraft (), in agreement on most of the specifications, has 19.2! Both sources are agreed on the "cruise"/"normal" speed 40.6 m/s)  and the (minimum) rate of sink (2.2 m/s) and the ratio of these is 18.5 = glide angle.  You might fret a little about differences between speeds for minimum sink and for best glide ratio but, though the latter is always bigger, it is typically only so by around 15%.  Surely the brick-like 5.2 is wrong? Be interesting to know the glide ratio (L/D) for other big gliders like the Horsa but these seem hard to find.TSRL (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The DFS 230 managed 18.TSRL (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Glide ratio
Talk:Ed Steinberg

message: Steinski1 has added a number of references to the EL section. I've moved them here so that the material within can be processed into the article text. Wwwhatsup (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New refs 
Talk:PZL SZD-30 Pirat

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.gliding-in-melbourne.org/pirat.htm#Top. The material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material without verification of permission; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:PZL Bielsko SZD-50 Puchacz

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.gliding-in-melbourne.org/puchacz.htm#Top The material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material without verification of permission; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello. Please revise this article according to https://www.easa.europa.eu/certification/type-certificates/docs/aircraft/EASA-TCDS-A.312_SZD--50--3_Puchacz-01-22032007.pdf
Manufacturer of this sailplane is Allstar PZL Glider instead of PZL Bielsko.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.253.225.54 (talk) 06:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inccorect data
Talk:Schneider ES-65

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed