lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thousand Islands National Park

message: What is an oTENTik?  This needs to be explained, if it’s a real thing, or removed if not. awkwafaba (📥) 02:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  oTENTik?? 

message: I was just browsing through recent Orders-in-Council and came across this  one from a couple of weeks ago (Nov 25, 2022). It's transferring new land to the NP, and if my quick rough math is correct, this land area for this park just nearly doubled. I just tried to look for news coverage of this and found nothing, can someone read this over and verify? CASalt (talk) 10:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The order already seems to be in effect, this is a snapshot from the Wayback Machine  showing the schedule of the Canada National Parks Act in August. Here is the current schedule . Everything from "Thirteenthly" in Part 5 (1) is new, this portion of the schedule defines the parks boundaries. CASalt (talk) 10:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

text: My best guess is that this 'new' land is already included in the 24.4 km figure cited by the article since this land has apparently been de facto governed by Parks Canada since 2006 (according to the "Background" subheading in the "Regulatory Analysis" section of the first link), but if someone else could take a look at this and share their thoughts, that would be appreciated. CASalt (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the size of this National Park increase?
Talk:Central Railway Building

message: Please check the accuracy and relevance of the following sentences: "The Central Railway Building is one of the few remaining buildings that tell the history of two hundred years of British colonial rule in Chittagong. In 1764, the British rulers took over the control of Chittagong from Nawab Mir Qasim and ruled it until 1947 before the Partition of India." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 
Talk:Nabakumar Institution

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Nabakumar_Institute. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  💵Money💵emoji💵💸 22:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:John Zeglis

message: This article is a work-in-progress.  I will take "ownership" of this over the next few weeks.  Hopefully, others will contribute too.H.al-shawaf 15:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, this has taken longer than expected.H.al-shawaf (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I opened a discussion at WP:RS/N here about Zeglis:
:Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RS_possibilities_for_John_D._Zeglis   (permalink)
It has quite a few sources that could be used for the article to justify WP:NOTABILITY and as WP:RS.
I also put notice of the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability here:
:Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Discussion_of_specific_sources_for_notability
--David Tornheim (talk) 14:44, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of discussion of RS for this article
Talk:Sichuan clique

message: "Data shows all numbers of dead or injured solders (totally 3.26 billions), including 2.24 billions from Sichuan clique. Especially, from 1939 to 1945, the death numbers of solders has 640 millions from Sichuan within total 850 millions[1]. In the Battle of Shanghai, almost all 170 millions Sichuan clique fell in battle, only 2 thousands retreated to Hubei Province."
Really??? 3,260,000,000 casualties??? 170,000,000 in a single battle??? 
Someone better double-check those numbers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radoye (talk • contribs) 04:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties 

message: This article has too many unsourced claims, especially in the "World War II" section. The Verified Cactus 100% 20:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced claims
Talk:Muslim Government High School, Dhaka

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://dhakadailyphoto.blogspot.it/2006/12/secondary-schools-19th-to-early-20th.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:USS Enterprise (1799)

message: this section is incredibly long and probobly deserves its own article considering it was the first battle of the war....
-XavierGreen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by XavierGreen (talk • contribs) 03:08, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Enterprise vrs. Tripoli

message: Tecnically the USS Enterprise was a Brig, not a schooner, as noted in the beginning of the description. 74.75.169.81 (talk) 01:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of Vessel
Talk:People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

message: What was Ethiopia styled prior to 1987?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.8.96 (talk) 01:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Styling 

message: I just noticed something about flag and the coat of arms, it’s supposed to have a golden lion    but it was changed? McManDan (talk) 22:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag and the Coat of Arms
Talk:Buck the World

message: BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
BUCK THE WORLD WAS NOT CERTIFIED GOLD!!!!! </br>
Darius20 (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Buck The World" RIAA Certification
Talk:Online newspaper

message: I think this is a case of different British and American usage, but I'm baffled by the "soft copy" terminology in this mess of an article. It seems to be different than a traditional newspaper, but also different than an online-only paper. ("Soft copy" in the US usually means online only, not printed.) The description in the text makes no sense to me. Can anybody help? - DavidWBrooks 00:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soft copy? 

message: Hi,
It's a pity that there is no information about the ranking of online newspapers by daily/monthly/annual unique visitors. Is any organisation registering this?
El Comandante (talk) 10:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking  by popularity 

message: It seems obvious that the article should be limited to (reliable and notable) newspaper websites.
On that basis, it is surely too great a fudge to include a list of "online news websites" which include Yahoo! News, Google News, CNN, Fox News, NBC News, and NewsX.
At the same time, hundreds of genuine newspaper websites worldwide ar NOT listed!
I'm suggesting that the list is inappropriate and should simply be scrapped as unworkable. Bjenks (talk) 02:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspapers specifically 

message: This page was created in 2007 and it shows: It seems ludicrous in 2022 to label every site publishing news on the Internet as an "online newspaper," whether or not they have any historical (or current) connection to an actual print newspaper. Wikipedia currently has no page for "News website," "News site," or similar — they all redirect to this "Online newspapers" page. Among the things that lumps into "online newspapers": Drudge Report, NBCNews.com, Meduza, BuzzFeed News, The Daily Wire, Rappler, MinnPost, Raw Story, Sputnik (news agency), Chalkbeat, TheBlaze, and Noozhawk — none of which would be fairly described as an "online newspaper" and all of which could be considered "news sites" or "news websites." I propose creating a new article dedicated to news websites, taking some material from here, and refocusing this page on the online versions of print newspapers. Flaggingwill (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differentiate online newspapers vs. news sites
Talk:Willis Van Devanter

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Willis Van Devanter was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Why would an Assistant Attorney General work in the Interior Department? john k (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whuh? 
Talk:Bill Ayres

message: Juda S. Engelmayer 16:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Cooper Grier

message: The article refers to unnamed "critics," and does not provide any citations for its allegations.  It also mischaracterizes the Inaugural Address of James Buchanan.  Buchanan did not allude to the result.  He merely mentioned that the case was pending and used the following words:
"This is, happily, a matter of but little practical importance. Besides, it is a judicial question, which legitimately belongs to the Supreme Court of the United States, before whom it is now pending, and will, it is understood, be speedily and finally settled. To their decision, in common with all good citizens, I shall cheerfully submit, whatever this may be, . . ."
Did he have advance knowledge of the decision, which was announced only two days later?  Maybe.  But based on a literal reading of Buchanan's remarks at his inauguration, one cannot say for sure.
John Paul Parks (talk) 17:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What did you find when you consulted the Timothy Hall source cited at the end of the paragraph? postdlf (talk) 17:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged Conspiracy with Alexander Stephens
Talk:Kingdom of Egypt

message: Is it appropriate to have a map which shows where modern Egypt is? Although Egypt's borders are the same, those of  surrounding countries were  not, and it seems wrong to imply that they were, which is, I think, what that map does. john k 18:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: المملكه المصريه--This is the ARABIC name (literally, "The Egyptian Kingdom"). It is not "Egyptian Arabic" as such. There is only one Arabic written language. As the words are not vocalized/voweled, there is nothing to show that it is pronounced in the colloquial Egyptian way ("Masr") rather than the Classical/Modern Standard "Misr." I quickly tried to correct this a few days ago, but the change went into the box instead of the text. I am glad it was removed--and further improvements made. 
Eleanor1944 (talk) 04:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  المملكه المصريه--not EGYPTIAN Arabic--just Arabic 

message: I have two questions:
1. Have Afghanistan, Nepal and Bhutan been a British protectorate?
2. Was Egypt independent of the United Kingdom from 1922 to 1952?  
--Davi Gamer 2017 (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egypt, Afghanistan, Nepal and Bhutan in British Empire
Talk:Yemen Arab Republic

message: The article only mentions that Yemen was part of the Ottoman Empire; it doesn't talk about the kingdom of Yemen being split - to be later reunified. I think that the section should be about "unification" (for the first time). Francis Hannaway (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reunification or unification? 

message: I don't think the infobox is correct. 
69.166.112.10 (talk) 17:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  today part of Saudi Arabia? 

message: yall how do i fix article titles, theres a typo in the title its supposed to be YEMENI Arab Republic Notmyrealnam3 (talk) 16:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yemen Arab Republic is the correct form of the country’s name.https://www.britannica.com/place/Yemen  |MK| 📝 10:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  titles wrong
Talk:Salmeterol

message: I am an African American and I wanted to know why does asthma affect African Americans more so than their counterparts and also what part does salmeterol play?
130.156.7.236 16:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: What does this refer to exactly? Is it what's sometimes known as an accuhaler? I have one of those for flixotide, I think it might be worth noting if they are the same thing. cyclosarin (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Disk-styled" Inhaler

message: It was made "in the 1980s," but does anyone have a more specific date?  I can't find anything on GSK's site or via web searches. 67.244.2.127 (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date?

message: Hi I am a final year medical student who is working on this page to make it better. I would like to work more  on the mechanism of action of the drug and other important details which is useful to make this page to give more valuable information to common people. Monica Gopalakrishnan (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you for the review i have made the changes in the side effects section as suggested. the pregnancy and lactation subsection was already present and i could not find sources which tell about animal studies. it think its in bold font for people looking out if the drug is harmful during pregnancy or not. (Monica Gopalakrishnan (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osmosis Wikipedia editing course 

message: Is there a permanent link to this ( Ramanujan K (June 9, 2006). "Common asthma inhalers cause up to 80 percent of asthma-related deaths, Cornell and Stanford researchers assert". ChronicalOnline - Cornell University. )? The current link is dead. 
zandperl (talk) 03:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref 19 link dead
Talk:Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)

message: I'm pretty sure that at least part of the Silver Star Mountain is within Clark County limits.  The Silver Star Southridge Tailhead is in Camas, Clark County, WA. 2601:1C2:4580:26C0:1B69:1624:53F5:736D (talk) 14:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clark County?
Talk:Jefferson Han

message: Someone should post a picture of Jeff.
Darlyn Perez 16:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's listed at http://myhome.hanafos.com/~soonjp/project.html as one of several developers of CU-SeeMe. 82.36.30.34 07:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The video of him at TED shows him in 2006 demonstrating exactly the best features of the iPhone that was first demonstrated in Jan 2007.  Did Apple buy rights from him or did they independently develop it?  Who has the patents?  Most notably, the stretch and squeeze feature for zooming in.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.120.227 (talk) 19:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPhone 
Talk:2007 Finnish parliamentary election

message: Is it at all possible to have a transalation of the information on the Finnish page available here? --CTerry 16:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: "Results of Finland's elections show the governing centre-left coalition of Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen (pictured) likely to retain power with a reduced majority."
This is very unlikely, the centre-right National Coalition got 50 seats and Social Democratic Party 45 seats. Most probably it will be a centre-right government. Or did I misunderstood something? --Pudeo (Talk) 23:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The front page may be jumping to conclusions. I don't think it's known right now who the Centre Party will form a coalition with. Crumbsucker 23:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

text: News on frontpage is inaccurate. Please remove it quickly. Coalition will be centre-right. Nobody knows it yet. National Coalition Party was biggest winner and thats it. --Zzzzzzzzzz 00:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main page news 

message: I believe there is a mistake in the text:
Niinistö also set a record for the highest number of personal votes, 60,498, which is almost twice as high as the previous record, and with the application of the d'Hondt method used in Finland, as many as four other National Coalition candidates were elected to Parliament on the strength of these votes.
Now normally I would just correct it but because I am not 100% sure I write it here. I think I remember a women in the 1950's getting around 57.000 personal votes. I don't remember her name but she grew up in the Soviet union but with a Finnish father and mother. She was original a communist, like her father, and ran for SKDL.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.41.1 (talk) 10:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not true 
Talk:Power Punch II

message: ... are there any sources whatsoever that confirm that this was originally an official sequel farmed out to third-party sources as oppsed to simply a Punch-Out ripoff?  It seems highly unlikely that Nintendo would say "Well, since we can't have Tyson, we don't want to do the game at all" and turn it over to an American and Australian company, since that contradicts the fact that Punch-Out was re-released without Tyson (without being famred out to third-party companies) and a sequel without Tyson was released for the SNES (without being farmed out to third-party companies). - 76.105.67.208 17:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years on, and still no references for this game being designed as a sequel to Punch-Out, not even unreliable ones. I'd say that pretty much confirms your suspicion that it is a hoax. I'll go delete it now.--Martin IIIa (talk) 22:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years further, and people are citing a vague IGN article with unsourced data. The original ROM of "Mike Tyson's Intergalactic Power Punch" has been recovered, and guess what? It's still credited as an American Softworks production. And if it was being commissioned by Nintendo, why wouldn't it be branded Punch-Out!! to begin with? I think this hoax/rumor deserves a debunking sort of mention in-article.  LupintheThird (talk) 23:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In 1991 to 1992, video game magazines GamePro, EGM, the other one I can't remember, and Game Players Nintendo Guide all hyped this game and reported it as such to be the "sequel" to Punch-Out, then they all backed off and forgot the game existed once released because of how poor the title is (their opinions, not mine). Be logical, as well, and consider why the name of the game is Power Punch II. 68.96.214.115 (talk) 19:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video game magazines
Talk:Gene Wojciechowski

message: The section on the incident in the Chicago Tribune was pretty well documented and keeps being removed by user Cajabi.  He even masked one removal by commenting that he changed a link.  The substantial edit he did was to remove the racism allegations.  There is no reason given for the removal.  This is rather suspicious.
170.232.128.11 16:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations of Racism
Talk:Savage Skies

message: If there's anyone who can, will someone help me with this article, since I don't get long on the computer to write it.
Prince Yriel 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article is likely in violation of the rules about video game summaries, but I'm not expert enough in that area to do anything about it.  Basic copyedit is done.Levalley (talk) 01:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit notes
Talk:Emily Anderson

message: Dr Healey (Moore Institute reference) rather belittles Emily Anderson's work in the British Foreign Office - implying she was shuffling papers, etc, and includes a lot of extraneous material (including, bizarrely, a reference to honey-trapping!). The briefer reference from GCHQ says she was a most efficient intelligence officer. Calc-flinta (talk) 01:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Did she start working in intelligence in 1918 (according to GCHQ) or 1920? Calc-flinta (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ui Chionna biography indicates Anderson started her cryptographic career in July 1918, resigning her academic post for "the duration of the war". She was then re-recruited in 1919-20 as the new GC&CS service was established so there was a period where she was trying to keep her academic career open whilst also negotiating to stay in her cryptographic career. EEHalli (talk) 14:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emily Anderson's intelligence work
Talk:Magdalena Graaf

message: maybe their should be one article on the sisters together.. maybe called he graaf sisters or something like that..--Matrix17 16:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it necessary to have pentacostal included in her parentage?  I don't see the reason to have it included in  top paragraph.  It doesn't really matter if they were of pentacostal or any other Christian denominations.  Norum 18:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swedish Pentecostal parents 