lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Caleruega

message: The infobox listed Calerogano/a as "nickname". It isn't a nickname. It is the ordinary name in Spanish for inhabitants of Caleruega. I'm not sure if this detail is wanted in an English article about the town: if it is, it perhaps has to go in the article rather than in an infobox? Andrew Dalby 21:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish name for inhabitants 
Talk:Mystic Records

message: All my mystic CD's have trouble getting on itunes. The Nardcore cd wont load at all! MB Style 23:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does. BME 21:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Human Rights Commission

message: The Human Rights Commission Page allows for the user to see HRCs that have sub-national, non-official and international status. Mostlyharmless 22:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

message: merged to Human Rights Commission per merge tag; all content was duplicated between these two pages. phoebe 20:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:The Golden Spiders

message: The characters should be listed and identified generally. Currently, the plot seems to be strewn throughout the character descriptions. I don't know enough about the story to clean this up myself. --SidP 00:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Infobox complete; changed "yes" to "no" in the incomplete infobox template. The plot summary has been converted to prose; the characters are in a clean list. — WFinch 03:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters subsection vs. Plot section
Talk:Linear integrated circuit

message: I took these two bits out:
"An analog chip uses its active devices primarily in their active regions. This is the fundamental difference between digital chips and analog chips. 
Digital chips define only two states by using devices in the cutoff region and often in the overdriven region as well."
:It is nothing but a misconception. Analog switches use MOSFETs NOT in active regin, but analog switches are analog ICs. Neonil 12:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pieces removed, that may be salvageable

message: to Linear integrated circuit or (second choice) Analog integrated circuit. Leave chips to chipmunks. What's your take ?? East of Borschov 07:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong agree to Analog integrated circuit.  Overjive (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree and done. Rob Kam (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move suggestion
Talk:Vijay Amritraj

message: I would like to film the complete movement of plane from KULALAMPUR till it fell in a volcano as per my investigation.I feel you must do it.I will give the complete movement action of plane,as I studied in depth details with engineering basis and witness.
Are you interested? 103.84.178.164 (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am investigating MH 370 hidden location in Sumatra Indonesia.
Talk:API-Calculus

message: The article as currently written seems a little overly general is talking about the differences between pi-calculus and api-calculus.  It describes some of the goals api-calc attempts to achieve, and some of its newly defined terms, but doesn't go into any details on those definitions or how they actually work.  So me, as a casual reader, is having a hard time getting a handle on exactly how api-calculus works compared to pi-calculus.  
I'd suggest adding some examples and some more formal mathematical definitions, ala the pi-calculus article, that can help explain things a little more clearly for the casual reader. Dugwiki 22:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article seems a little vague 

message: Can Someone assure that this is not a case of someone inventing something and writing a wikipedia page about it. Apologies for my prejudice. But too busy to actually do lot of searching around. 2407:C00:C003:22AB:1:2:C219:A0C3 (talk) 16:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this "usually" used in Java as said? Is the reference given actually relevant?
Talk:Adenovirus serotype 36

message: is AD-36 a permanent infection?
is it treatable?
These two issues should be known, but are not in any of the news releases about obesity.
These issues are not in any of the releases because the researchers concerned are still working on these questions.  Finding out in the first place that obesity is caused by a virus is an achievement, which is what all the press releases were about.
: Let's not get carried away until there is a peer-reviewed paper in human subjects. Press releases are notorious for promoting "proof" that often does not hold up under peer-review. Not implying that is necessarily the case here, but we should not simply take the press release as proof that their results are solid. Also, they did not show all obesity is caused by a virus, rather they claim to show that the virus can cause fat gain. That's a subtle, but important distinction. --chodges 07:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Press releases didn't promote proof of anything.  Authors did not intend to show that all human obesity is caused by a virus.  Nor did they show that a virus can cause fat gain, they showed that it DOES cause fat gain in animals, human cells and human tissue.  Implications for human obesity are being researched.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.105.153.73 (talk) 03:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Hard-Boiled Wonderland and the End of the World

message: The statement in this section
that The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle was cited by the author of Haibane Renmei as inspiration for his work is contradictied in the Haibane Renmei article itself; nor is it mentioned in the Wind-Up Bird article. Does anybody have proof pro or con?
Spugna 03:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: In The End of the World News: An Entertainment, Anthony Burgess also uses the technique of (three) different stories which in the end converge in a surprising way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dehagido (talk • contribs) 07:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible influences 
Talk:O Pioneers!

message: Cather's novels have very intricate plots and subplots. The summary is bound to be long, unless it is a botched job.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Hi, just to let everyone know, I separated the section "Literary Significance and Criticism" so that literary criticism stands on its own. From there, I added the whole section of text on criticism to the page and included the appropriate resources for what I said. Feel free to change anything or re-word it if necessary.--NoFace23 (talk) 07:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary Significance and Criticism
Talk:Century High School (Oregon)

message: I just did a major overhaul of this article. Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a bulletin board or random collection of info. Think like this: if this was an entry in the Encyclopedia Brittanica, what would it look like? The other major issue with this article is the lake of sources from reliable sources. Without reliable sources (the Wikipedia defenition) this article would not survive a deletion debate. Many articles about high schools in Oregon have been put up for deletion lately, so if you want the school article to remain, please provide sources. There should be plenty in The Oregonian. Aboutmovies 00:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up and other issues 
Talk:13 (The Doors album)

message: Prodded, as I don't think there is anything of value in the article as such; individual songs may warrant an article, or the album might be discussed as a whole on The Doors article. Tamarkot 22:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MacDonald sisters

message: I am not convinced that if a category is needed that Trivia is either helpful or appropriate. I think I would rather have no category at all. --DonBarton 22:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Trivia

message: How is "Mrs Alfred Baldwin" a pseudonym for Louisa?  That is how the wife of Alfred Baldwin would have been referred to in that society. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed the phrasing. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mrs Alfred Baldwin 

message: My references spell it with a lower-case "D" (Macdonald).  Any objection to moving this article and making that change? - PKM (talk) 03:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Macdonald
Talk:STREAMS

message: Windows NT contained a third party implementation of STREAMS by Spider Systems (not Lachman) because Microsoft worked with Spider to port their STREAMS-based TCP/IP stack to Windows NT (as noted elsewhere, this implementation was eventually mostly replaced by a BSD-derived implementation).  The first Windows README to actually acknowledge this was the one that came with NT 6.0 (Vista), however!
Here's an archived mailing list article discussing this: Re: Query: How to tell if Microsoft is using BSD TCP/IP code?.
Mark Valentine (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So why not place it in the article? Dgtsyb (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's there now.  I'll cite the mailing list article in addition to the already-cited Kuro5hin posting. Guy Harris (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows NT and STREAMS 

message: This article is really bad.
First, this sentence 
"Eric S. Raymond quotes Ritchie as saying about the complexity of System V STREAMS when compared to his V8 Streams that "Streams means something different when shouted".
imparts zero information and is neither cute nor funny. It doesn't even make sense.
Second, there is absolutely no information in the article about what STREAMS actually does or how it is different from sockets. There is a fair amount of "My schwantz is bigger than your schwantz" here on the talk page but precious little info.
Ten minutes' search elsewhere gave me the real difference between STREAMS and sockets, several articles showing tests that STREAMS was two or three times faster than sockets, and a couple descriptions of why sockets would be a better choice for other tasks.
No such information is contained here.
Bad show, chaps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.22.142.82 (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: And your comment is nonconstructive. Why don't you either fix the article, or post links to those articles here, instead of complaining? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low quality and uninformative 
Talk:Friday's Child (novel)

message: I wrote the (original) plot summary (this being a novel I know extremely well), and someone has since added what looks to me to be all the novel's relevant distinguishing characteristics, and an exhaustive list of characters, down to the canary.
Surely this is all that's necessary?  We don't want a regurgitated précis of the entire story like some ghastly caricature of Reader's Digest, do we?
Paul Magnussen 20:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But it does need more statements of notability, review critical comment or acclaim, 2rd party referencing etc. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub-Class?

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata
Talk:Kenji Nojima

message: The ja: article might suggest that he and his wife have a son and daughter, but I'm not an expert in the Japanese language and have not yet included it in the article unless I find some factual varication on English sites...Ranma9617 22:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tanzil

message: Seemingly, it is not part of mainstream sufism. No reference is found in:
*Al-Guirgany (740-816 AH). كتاب التعريفات: معجم فلسفي منطقي صوفي فقهي لغوي نحوي
علي بن محمد بن سيد الشريف الجرجاني.
*Al-Kashany (?-730 AH, 1329 AD).اصطلاحات الصوفية
عبد الرازق الكاشاني.
--Connection 22:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Burnaby Mountain

message: Burnaby Mountain is a beautiful place. If we could get some better photos of sfu or the view from burnaby mountain, it would liven up the page Supercraft9905:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: There are some references, so this tag ("This article does not cite any references or sources.") should be either removed or exchanged by another (if such exists).  I think it should be removed.
RNSanchez 12:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference tag 
Talk:Temple of the Winds

message: Who is Drefan? The article mentions him at the end, saying that Kahlan can't defeat him, but this is the only time he is ever mentioned. I haven't read the book myself, so I don't know. Would someone who has read the book please fill in the missing information? Roachmeister 23:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From the first paragraph of the plot summary: Richard's half-brother Drefan, a high priest of a secret sect, does however succeed in curing Cara.  I think this makes it perfectly clear who Drefan Rahl is.  Also, there is no character page for Drefan because realistically, he's such a minor character (appearing in only this novel) that he doesn't merit his own article. Hope this helps. - Runch 02:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right - I missed that sentence.  Thanks! Roachmeister 14:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drefan 

message: The problems of tone and content are in this article as the other individual SoT pages. Please see the Talk:Stone of Tears page for more info. NeoFreak 14:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and content
Talk:Longstreet's Assault

message: Redirect this to the Day 2 Gettysburg article... Scott Mingus 22:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would actually be cleaner to delete this page entirely because "Longstreet's Assault" applies legitimately to a number of battles. Would anyone object if we ask for this to be deleted in a week or so? (I will have to figure out how to do the deletion proposal procedure, unless someone else would like to volunteer.) Hal Jespersen 00:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Agree with deletion. This material alone is not enough for an article. --FloNight 19:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Agree with deletion
Talk:Ards F.C.

message: The capacity for Clandeboye Park is 3000 here, but 4000 at the Bangor City F.C. page. MnJWalker 22:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stadium Capacity
Talk:Victory Square, Vancouver

message: Re this:
:The first, commencing "Their name", is from Ecclesiasticus, Chapter 44, Verse 14.
I'm pretty sure it's Ecclesiastes that's meant, but I could be wrong, and I don't have a Bible handy to check (nor a copy of Ecclesiasticus).  Given the number of masons in early Vancouver maybe a more arcane text is the source of the inscription, but ...... unlikely.Skookum1 (talk) 22:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Ecclesiasticus]]'' or ''[[Ecclesiastes]]''??
Talk:Geoffrey I of Villehardouin

message: Why "Geoffrey Villehardouin" and not "Geoffrey of Villehardouin" or "Geoffrey de Villehardouin"? Srnec 22:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that section should be either reformatted, integrated into the article perhaps by paraphrasing, or deleted. It doesn't really seem to fit with the rest of the article, IMO. - Iotha 23:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text from the Chronicle of the Crusade
Talk:Little Mountain (British Columbia)

message: I removed some promotional copy on the King Ed & Main area, which is part of what's now called "the Main".  Yes, there is a neighbourhood associated with Little Mountain and that name, but nobody calls Main Street "Little Mountain"....if anything that would be on the Cambie side, and really refers to north and south of the mountain and the immediate area on the east around Nat Bailey Stadium.  The neighbourhood article, if citable, should be split off and the Neighbourhoods category taken with it.Skookum1 (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a mountain article
Talk:RKO Forty Acres

message: If the lot is named RKO Forty Acres, why does the lead state that it is only 28.5 acres? Thomprod (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many acres?
Talk:Treaty of Viterbo

message: The phrase "War of the Terciers of Euboea" probably won't evoke clear pictures for the average reader and might be given a little user-friendly explanatory appositive. --Wetman 23:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it now? Adam Bishop 02:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another reading convinces me that this is my idea of a good article, though I'd never recommend it for that fruitless and time-consumimng label. --Wetman 23:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Auschwitz cross

message: This page has no citations and should be cleaned up for quality, grammar, and accuracy.
Also, the last paragraph is purely opinion and emotional and inappropriate to the article.
Reccommend the entire page be integrated into the Auschwitz article and/or updated with citations.
Dramain703 23:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added template messages based on earlier comments.  I find that this article is not written from a neutral point-of-view based especially on the last paragraph, and no citations are included.  It is a useful article but is not up to Wiki standards.
Dramain703 23:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems neutral to me. In fact, it seems rather understated. --Charlene 20:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added template messages 

message: virtually none of the claims are cited
the one citation is to an interview with one rabbi
there are many weasel words: 'some catholics', 'some jews', etc... be more specific as to which/how many people we are talking about, and/or cite your claims (note that 'some catholics/jews' etc could be justified, i.e. if we're talking about some, but not all, catholics/jews, but it should be specific if possible, quantified if appropriate, and cited either way) --Arkelweis (talk) 19:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: I don't know the topography, but some crosses were removed by the police in 2013, so the text is outdated. Xx236 (talk) 10:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some crosses were removed in 2013 

message: It's possible that he was a Communist spy, who robbed German Jewelers :pl:Afera „Żelazo”. Xx236 (talk) 11:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mieczysław Janosz
Talk:Al-Qasim ibn Hasan ibn Ali

message: (1) You mentioned that qasim born in 669, his father died when the boy was three years old. historically,  it is well known that the father poisoned and died within few hours in 669(or 670).
(2) the boy left Medina, with his uncle in the summer of 680 not 670.
(3) your source is melodramatised the events of qasim death and turned to an unbelivable legends, such as :
 A)the letter of the father predicting and advising his boy to defend his uncle 
 B)the coversation between the boy and his mother on the eve of the battle. 
 C)the heroic action of the boy in the battlefield.
I expected the Wikipedia information to be logical an rational, unfortunatly in this chapter
i am really disappointed.
Dr.K. Hussain
King's college London  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.73.34.188 (talk) 16:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  al-qasim ibn al-hasan: historical errors and myths. 

message: The article says that he was born on 7 Sha'aban 47 AH, which is in 667 CE. But it also says he was born in 669 CE. --Delirium (talk) 01:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradiction in birth dates 

message: I improved the article and added more reliable sources. Also, I tried to resolve the issues mentioned. Now we can remove the notability tag. M1nhm (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve the article
Talk:Acle

message: Is Acle actually a town? I would say it is much more a large village Gingerblokey 23:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Town?

message: How pronounce: a-kəl or ɛi-kəl. 79.100.50.215 (talk) 16:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Richard Gray, a renouned fashion & advertising illustrator, grew up in Acle. 86.184.206.205 (talk) 23:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable resident: Richard Gray
Talk:Nólsoyar Páll

message: Is it just me or wouldn't it be better to name this Nólsoyar Páll like the Faroese and Danish pages? So far, I've created a redirect to the other name. Valentinian (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the page. The other Scandinavian Wikis follow the Faroese example. Valentinian (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I suspect that's not entirely true :) It might have been the first Faroese oceangoing ship since the middle ages, but I'm not so sure about that either. Also, he did *not* die in Sumba - he was lost at sea. 212.55.39.188 (talk) 00:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New name for this article?
Talk:RWTH Aachen University

message: The RWTH logo changed some month ago (there is now vertical spacing between RWTH Aachen and University)
:Source?  On , “Das Kommunikationskonzept”, there is still the old logo, as is in the latest issue of “RWTHinsight”. – Torsten Bronger 04:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not surprised about this content. just try and check some of the IPs
as 134.130.4.243 from 21st of July removing the cleanup-tag
The IP belongs to the namespace... zs2.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE.
Oh what a surprise.
I think it says a lot about the "excellence" of this institution editing their own articles like this...
--93.129.84.189 (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And it never occurred to you that it might be students editing the article? 80.138.9.65 (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

text: So if you ever studied or lived in a place or university, you must not contribute to its wikipedia page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.23.163.142 (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is maintained by RWTH itself

message: Not enough to establish individual notability of department for its own article Melcous (talk) 10:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Aachen Institute for advanced study in Computational Engineering Science]] 

message: What may be the cost structure 103.228.46.98 (talk) 02:10, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  University
Talk:Sara Driver

message: I nominated the speedy delete but it appears that the author is adding more detail to the page that may qualify it to be kept. Reswobslc 23:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is she related to Adam Driver? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Adam Driver]]