Talk:Mount Pleasant, South Carolina

message: Edited... opinions are not permitted, stick to the facts people. Uopmegabytes 14:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Safety 

message: It's a town, they are not the same under state law, shouldn't it be the fifth largest Municipality in South Carolina?Iamanadam 21:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fifth Largest City in SC?

message: I have now twice (here and here) reverted edits that added a great deal of unsourced information, were poorly formatted, and in general lacked an encyclopedic tone and sounded like an advertisement for the town from a Chamber of Commerce brochure or website. I have reached out to the editor in question asking them to discuss their edits either here or on their talk page and have not been engaged. I will not revert a third time; if the edits are reinstated with no discussion I will tag the page with an NPOV template and invite general discussion.   Cjmclark (Contact) 00:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of unsourced and poorly formatted edits (July 2012) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ccsdschools.com/districts.cfm?subject_id=2&district=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050205123518/http://www4.charleston.net/ to http://www.charleston.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213222604/http://mountpleasant-sc.patch.com/listings/otis-picket-bridge-recreation-area-pitt-street-bridge to http://mountpleasant-sc.patch.com/listings/otis-picket-bridge-recreation-area-pitt-street-bridge
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101104180847/http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/bulletins/fy2009/09-01.pdf to http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/bulletins/fy2009/09-01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: The area of what I have seen of Mt. Pleasant is entirely flat (not surprising since it is in the flatlands.) There is no mention that I could find of when the town was incorporated and when or why it was named Mt. Pleasant. Since pretty much every state has a town of the same name (in fact, there is another place in SC called that same thing, the town where Mary Chesnut was born), I'm wondering if this a Biblical name? 98.219.126.182 (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name "Mt. Pleasant"  

message: Breach Inlet is between Sullivan’s Island and the Isle of Palms. It seems unlikely to me that the Hunley would launch from there to get to Charleston Harbor. Seems like it would have launched close to the Pitt Street Bridge near the Harbor on the south side of Sullivan’s Island. Navinger (talk) 15:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breach Inlet 

message: can we add to the notice on top a direct link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn%27s_Wisconsin_plant ?
That event mentions the same name of the city, in WI. Yet this is the largest city with the same name (and the more visible google result for it) 209.131.62.126 (talk) 23:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  other town with same name