lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Herndon station

message: Re: "The existing parking garage has 1,750 spaces."
What parking garage? This needs to be expounded on a bit. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There were references in the article to the existing parking garage and kiss and ride facility, but I have greatly expanded the treatment to make clear that the facility opened in 1999 and will be supplemented by the Metro facilities in the Dulles Access Road median in 2016. Racepacket (talk) 00:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome. Thank you for clarifying. SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Parking garage?

message: If anyone could find the platform view of Herndon, please do so asap. Thank you. Williamwang363 (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture needs to be updated
Talk:Ashburn station (Washington Metro)

message: Is this picture really of the station, or just a generic Metro photo. Awiseman 02:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generic; all the new Silver Line stations use the same photo, except Dulles, since we have a pic of Dulles. --Golbez 04:09, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, I'd guess that when the stations are built, though, that they will look more like New York Avenue, Morgan Boulevard, and Largo rather than Eisenhower Avenue. Still, it works as a generic picture. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:08, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true. The newer ones are a bit more futuristic. Plus, they're probably not all side platform, as Eisenhower Ave is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jnelson09 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: In fact, they all appear to be center platform stations. Should we get a center-platform picture, then? --Jnelson09 02:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any real purpose in replacing the photo of Eisenhower Avenue (which I basically chose to be a generic Metro photo) with a generic photo of a center-platform station. It seems a waste of time. I see such effort better used to work to replace the generic photo with a map or something similar to what we used on the articles for Wiehle Avenue, Tysons West, Tysons Central 7, Tysons Central 123, and Tysons East. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?
Talk:Majid bin Said of Zanzibar

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister
This royal ark's link is also used as resource on the article itself. It demonstrates the titles as Sayyid and Sayyida
http://www.royalark.net/Tanzania/zanz3.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.114.159 (talk) 06:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheikha
Talk:Barghash bin Said of Zanzibar

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister 
This royal ark's link is also used as resource on the article itself. It demonstrates the titles as Sayyid and Sayyida
http://www.royalark.net/Tanzania/zanz3.htm Zanzibar (92.98.114.159 (talk) 06:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheikha
Talk:Khalifah bin Said of Zanzibar

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister
This royal ark's link is also used as reference on the article itself. It demonstrates the titles as Sayyid and Sayyida
http://www.royalark.net/Tanzania/zanz3.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.114.159 (talk) 07:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheikha
Talk:Tim Collins (financier)

message: This article presently contains no source citations at all. Please supply them per the verifiability policy if you wish to have this content remain. Note that the policy says "The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain." Dpbsmith (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source citations, please

message: The RHJ International holding company website shows Timothy C. Collins as its CEO. .  Is it correct that he is CEO of both Ripplewood and RHJI?  Thanks.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that RHJI is Ripplewood Holdings Japan.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 20:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RHJI
Talk:Khalid bin Barghash of Zanzibar

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister
This royal ark's link is also used as resource on the article itself. It demonstrates the titles as Sayyid and Sayyida
http://www.royalark.net/Tanzania/zanz3.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.114.159 (talk) 06:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheikha 

message: The age range in the infobox appears to be wrong: if his birth and death dates are correct, he would have been in his 50s not his 30s.
Ziggurat 09:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age wrong
Talk:Korean mun

message: Hi, if anyone has the time, this page would greatly benefit a read-thru for grammar and punctuation errors. I appreciate that this page is likely a translation of the Korean page, but it needs at least a once-over. Some clarification wouldn’t hurt either, ex: stating that private minting was OK, but then next section talking about ‘illegal currency’. This is incredibly confusing- when was the line drawn? What *was* the line? This could use some explanation. Things like that. 2603:7000:8240:EC00:C9A4:AAAB:F10C:5235 (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar check and clarification
Template talk:MultiLicenseCommunism

message: This template survived a debate at TfD. See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 January 28 for details. -Splashtalk 23:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TfD debate

message: "Use it as you see fit."
You see grammar is very important to the [...] party
2600:6C4E:1200:1E85:6901:4008:ED77:34AB (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seem to see
Talk:Chicago Railroad Fair

message: Looking around today, I've found a few sites that mention specific equipment at the fair in 1948 that aren't listed in the 1949 program that I was using as a reference.  For now, integrating the data into the existing lists seems to work, but I wonder if some of the 1949 data didn't apply to the 1948 fair.  As I find more information, I'll be sure to update this too. Slambo (Speak) 21:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences between 1948 and 1949 

message: The first photo, showing the 1949 entrance, should be be credited to the Joe and Jeanette Archive, not the "... Archie."Kdammers (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entrance photo source 

message: An article about the fairs, written by Chicago historian R. C. Lindbgerg, was printed in the Summer 2016 Chicagoly Magazine, pp. 12-14, "Summertime Joy In The 1940s" (caps in original). Kdammers (talk) 17:43, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  an article
Talk:Hamoud bin Mohammed of Zanzibar

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister
This royal ark's link is also used as reference on the article itself. It demonstrates the titles as Sayyid and Sayyida
http://www.royalark.net/Tanzania/zanz3.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.114.159 (talk) 07:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheikha
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Akindele Akinyemi

message: it seems like all of you are just hating. Must I submit a resume to show you my credentials?
If I gave money to this site you would not have a problem. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madwriter9 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We are not employed by this site which, by the way, is not for profit. We are just volunteers who want this encyclopedia to have encyclopedic content. Besides the fact that I would be ashamed to engage in such self-aggrandizement as to write an article about myself, I also know I am not notable enough to warrant my own encyclopedia article (although if you googled me you'd get far more than 5 distinct hits). Do you really think you are worthy of your own article in an encyclopedia? Then you do need to post a resume; specifically, a resume of references showing that you are notable enough to be presented to the general public.  Most people are not "encyclopedic." It has nothing to do with "hating", it has to do with whether you are worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If you are, please substantiate that with references. --Fuhghettaboutit 00:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Abdullah bin Khalifa of Zanzibar

message: This is information is not sufficient enough, It should be more, try to expand article according to Wikipedia policies with proper citations, and if you allow my self I can certainly help you in expanding it.--Faizanalivarya (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding required

message: Sayyid and Sayyida are the correct official titles for the Omani royalties. They are the equivalents of prince/princess, duke/duchess, etc. The down link bellow redirects to the page of the council of minister in Oman on the official website of the Omani news agency (ONA). You can obviously view that the deputy prime minister (who's a member of the royal family) is entitled (H.H Sayyid Fahd bin Mahmoud al-Said). The same thing is indicated with the next two individuals from the council and the fifth and sixth as well.
http://omannews.gov.om/en/web/ona/the-council-of-minister
This royal ark's link is also used as resource on the article itself. It demonstrates the titles as Sayyid and Sayyida
http://www.royalark.net/Tanzania/zanz3.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.114.159 (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sayyid/Sayyida not Sheikh/Sheika!
Talk:Mitchell Rupe

message: Please cite sources for this article!  
JaeRae 23:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation? 

message: Rupe's death is listed as occurring on the 8th of February, 2006.
The article cited for this was written the day before.  Unless some murder conspiracy is in play, the article needs correcting (unless someone has another source on the 8th?) Darquis (talk) 01:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date of death?
Talk:Jedi Rocks

message: I started the article. Everything on it is done by me. (So far, since 2/8/06)
KdogDS
:I've changed the lyrics, as I can't find any other source for your version of them - the only result returned by Google was the Wikipedia article. There are a number of sources for the current version of the lyrics, however I've been unable to find any official source (yet), so they may be incorrect. If your lyrics came from an official source, reply here, and change them back. --YowzaTheYuzzum 05:50, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Start Up

message: There were several phonetic errors in the lyrics which i have done my best to address. Also, KDogDS, you shouldn't say that everything on an article is done by you, because naturally people will edit it. The article is not yours, as it belongs to wikipedia. I hope you understand what I mean. --Paaerduag 06:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant as of 2/8/06. Before then, I had done everything.   Anyway, some of the top-ish part of the lyrics I got from turning on my TV's captions when watching the little documentary-thing before the 1997 VHS edition of Return of the Jedi. So those have to be right. KdogDS 02:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have also added to the lyrics
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Alpha Chi Alpha

message: In keeping with the integrity and voting on articles in AfD, please check to see if 
*Jdubrule 
*138.88.71.143 
*Btone888 
are sock puppets on the basis that their lone entry on Wikipedia is a vote on this article.
--† Ðy§ep§ion † 00:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To the closing admin
Talk:Three Sisters (play)

message: This play is usually called Three Sisters, not The Three Sisters. I'll move the page unless anyone objects. The Singing Badger 00:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the move. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 17:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Anyone know which three plays this sentence refers to? It's not mentioned in Chekhov's own article...Amo 17:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "three other major plays"

message: This article's discussion of the play's characters, theme, and plot are one person's interpretation of the play and should not be in this article.  Moreover and in addition to interpretations not belonging in a Wikipedia entry, the editor's assertions and interpretations about the play are substantively questionable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.105.141.122 (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I reorganized the article and used templates to highlight some issues.  67.100.222.85 (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unverified Claims Problem: Interpretation

message: "There is critical conjecture[citation needed] that Sasha (or perhaps both Bobik and Sofochka) are Natasha's children by Protopopov, though no definitive textual evidence can determine this, though the implication is that each father is pushing the carriage with his own child in it." The one  tag doesn't cover it, and it's difficult to see where one might be found. Please surprise me—prove me wrong—by finding a reliable source, then we can  try to put the sentence in order. Meanwhile: deleting. --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A book source has now been provided, but because the contributor has added his/her own interpretation (preceded by "meaning") it's still original research and not allowed. --Old Moonraker (talk) 16:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tagged . --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Text corrected, two footnotes added,  tag removed. --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:51, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjecture upon conjecture 

message: The assertion that the Prozorov sisters were inspired by "the Zimmermann sisters of Perm" only cites "cf Russian wikipedia." I'm not heavily involved in Wikipedia editing, so forgive the newb question: Is this proper? Seems circular and unverifiable to me. I have no idea who these Zimmermann ladies were and have no direct way of finding out. Google searches of "Zimmermann sisters Perm Chekhov" just lead back to this article and hundreds of derivatives of it. -Scolford (talk) 03:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right: this isn't permitted; see WP:CIRCULAR for more. I'm going to delete it. The fact that the first reference I came across was from the Perm Tourist Board hasn't influenced my intention at all! To be fair, Chekhov did have Perm in mind when he was writing Three Sisters, and to be fair there had once been three notable sisters—enterprising German scoolteachers—in the town, but the rest is speculation. --Old Moonraker (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration
Talk:Hate Eternal

message: This page still needs a band photo and a more complete biography section. --Aboverepine 00:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They added a second guitarist in May 2005. My source is here: http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=36881 Aboverepine 23:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Members

message: It's my understanding that Alex Webster was never really a member of the band, he just helped out and played on the demo...Is there something out there saying he was officially in the band? Aboverepine 17:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Former Members

message: If the neutrality of this article is disputed, please why and what parts are in dispute. Aboverepine 03:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutraliy

message: Hello
Does someone know if the band started in 1997 or 1999
the article presents contradictory dates - 86.74.157.141 11:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  years present 

message: I am working on the Hate Eternal page, I added the city they came from and other things will be added. --HeavyWikiMetal (talk) 23:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More is/must be addad 

message: Can these guys really be considered Technical Death Metal? Their music kinda sounded more like just Brutal Death Metal, or does anyone have reliable sources on the tech death?Mogthetormentor (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Death Metal 

message: For what it's worth, I happen to know that these guys aren't the rage-filled reprobates their band name suggests. They're actually quite decent blokes whose talents and artistic predispositions have just taken them in this stylistic direction. I hesitate to mention this in the article, as I wouldn't want it to detract from the thematic mystique they've worked so hard to establish. – AndyFielding (talk) 04:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnomer
Template talk:Kidney

message: I've added this template as I think it will help navigation within articles relating to the kidney and renal function and renal endocrinology.  I've looked at other templates, and understand this may seem a little large.  There is a possibility it might be best split into several templates which can be used more selectiveley, but I'll wait for comments.  As for the poor number of links to renal circulation pages, I plan to improve this soon, if only to begin with by adding some stubs, but this is an area that can be improved greatly. | Spaully 00:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gianduia

message: Correct spelling is Gianduja (with J), as we can see in the italian Wikipedia and as it is spelled within this article. Gianduia (with i) is the common spelling for that wonderful hazelnut stuff. Should we move? --Adornix 00:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops: I just found the redirect from Gianduja. Should be the other way, I think. --Adornix 00:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Confederate Secret Service

message: started page Feb 8, hope to have the major work done in a week.  I know there is already a topic American Civil War spies but it covers a fraction of the different secret Confederate operations.Thatcher131 00:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I for one am looking forward to it, have had this bookmarked for a few weeks. heqs 13:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I knew next to nothing about the subject until I stumbled across the article, so just offering encouragement. It sounds like perhaps the larger article should be called something like "Covert operations of the Confederate States" and the 'official' "Special and Secret Bureau of the War Department" (or at least the legislation that called for it) would be mentioned therein and perhaps given its own article. heqs 19:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "In 1862, possibly following a suggestion from Sage, the Confederate Congress enacted a bounty of fifty percent of the value of any vessel destroyed by means of a new invention." but Sage isn't named. --AW 17:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Sage? 

message: I watched something on this group on the history channel last week, they were talking about the assignation of Lincoln and spies on both sides of the conflict and found it interesting that no one has mentioned them on Wiki let alone have written an article about them.
I'm currently trying to get some hard copies of something to back up what I got from the history channel show, once I get something I will post it to the article on the group which I plan on writing. If I turn up missing maybe they got me, lol, anyway please don't delete my contribution, I'm working on getting the facts to back it up.
6r3yf0x (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phoenix Society 
Talk:Generic filter

message: ::In axiomatic set theory, a discipline within mathematics, a filter F in a poset is called D-generic if
:::F\cap E = \varnothing,\, for all E ∈ D
This seems to assume D is some family of subsets of the poset.  But it does not say so!  Is it just any family?  Or some special kind of family? Michael Hardy 00:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fleshed out the article quite a bit to address these points. Much more remains to be said.... --Trovatore 02:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The present version of article says:
: Now if D is a collection of dense open subsets of P, in the topology whose basic open sets are all sets of the form {q|q≤p} for particular p in P...
I hope I have not overseen something, but I think that in order to get a base, the poset (P,≤)
should be directed. --Kompik (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topology?