lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pacific Cycle

message: Pacific Cycles appears to be a different company from Pacific Cycle, in which case http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Cycles  should not redirect to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Cycle. Pacific Cycles is at http://www.pacific-cycles.com/
A bit of evidence to support my contention is in post #71 in http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?373210-What-are-the-WORST-bike-brand-names/page3 Mecanoge (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pacific Cycle is said to be the US bicycles division of Dorel Industries  .  However, the Pacific Cycle brands page does not include Charge Bikes as one of its brands. 
Charge Bikes website has no indication of ownership.
Dorel does have Charge Bikes listed as one of its British based brands.
I am wondering if Pacific Cycle no longer distributes Charge Bikes and therefore the Charge Bikes should be deleted from the list of Pacific Cycle brands, but added to the Dorel Sports list of brands?  
  Mindfill (talk) 11:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charge Bikes
Talk:Enquire Within upon Everything

message: This should be 1884, but I don't have time to move it. See scanned cover of book at Gutenberg. --64.37.159.175 23:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The scan at Project Gutenberg is from 1894, and of the 75th edition. --Delirium 02:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Done (two years!), quotes shouldn't have links anyway, see WP:MOSQUOTE. Synook (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: http://www.w3c.rl.ac.uk/primers/history/origins.htm#c6p2 says that Enquire Within Upon Everything [...] was first published around 1850 and by 1862 had sold 196,000 copies with almost no advertising. By 1912, it had sold 1,428,000 copies [...] should we include this in the article? mabdul 11:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  older solding status 
Talk:Rissne

message: Rissne didn't have 184 murders in 2004, can someone please correct this? My source is not 100%, but in Stockholm and around the murder count was 56 for 2004, so how could it be 184 for Rissne...
Rissne is the ghetto or dark side of Stockholm and is offen not included in official counting or/and statistics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larsonic (talk • contribs) 11:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong facts...
Talk:The Association of Cricket Statisticians and Historians

message: The article seems to have settled down with no significant edits for about a year so I have taken the trouble to clean it up in accordance with WP:MOS by improving its structure and formatting.  I have also improved some of the content as there were still traces of POV in certain statements.  All previous posts on the talk page were more than a year old so I have archived them.
The article has been rated as start-class (see above) according to the WP:CRIC B-class criteria.  It could do with more citations, particularly from non-ACS sources.  The article could do with a useful image or two, if possible, but I think there is now sufficient content as we can see what the ACS is about, how it originated and, as summarised by the guides list, the work which the members have done.  --Jack | talk page 16:54, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating and article status

message: In point of fact only selected books are given out with the subscription. The Match Scores for instance, are not. THE WWoFCC was published by the Hamlyn group and actually ran to two editions, selling quite well. The backwards going books of inter-war match scores by Jim Ledbetter were also, originally at least, a commercial publication.ASMF (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications
Template talk:Sic

message: Instead of saying "[sic]", to avoid the template being blended into the rest of a sentence, it should use  tags. ([sic]) That way, it's easier to pick out. (e.g., "at this point alot [sic] of people could care less")
—theMainLogan (talk) 05:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: This is a contentious edit, or this has already been discussed, so you'll need to discuss first with other editors. If there is an existing discussion on the talk page please contribute to that section. If there is no existing discussion you may explain why this edit should be made in this section, or start a new section on this talk page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 22 June 2022 

message: This template should wrap its output in a  tag with a class so that automated tools can pick up from the emitted HTML as well that the text isn't a typo. Opencooper (talk) 10:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTML class
Talk:Ceremonial dance

message: Please ahve a look at Portal:Dance --Roland2 09:46, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Portal:Dance

message: The Lakeshore Chapter of the Sacred Dance Guild developed the following definition of sacred dance: Sacred dance encompasses all movement that expresses or enhances spiritual experiences. It may be a part of a worship service, a group experience or a private spiritual practice. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GodDance
I would put Sacred Dance as one of the main categories of dance and then put ceremonial and ritual dance under it. Also add the categories liturgical dance and praise dance. Body prayer is yet another form.
I offer the Sacred Dance Guild as a resource http://www.sacreddanceguild.org
MicheleMarie 15:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceremonial Dance as a subset of Sacred Dance 

message: We already have an article Sacred dance: it appears (e.g. Morris dance) that not all Ceremonial dances are sacred, though some kinds were or are. At the moment we also have Ecstatic dance, which intersects with Sacred dance but is not identical - not all sacred dances are ecstatic; some sacred dances are both ecstatic and ceremonial, e.g. the Sama whirling dance of the Sufis. It seems apparent that definition isn't easy but should be attempted. Clearly many of the traditions are ancient, so a History is also needed. I'd suggest, therefore, that we need something like the following sections:
:: Definition (nature, purpose, difference from Sacred, Ecstatic)
:: History (ancient, later, modern)
:: Description (geographic spread, types).
Whether a list like the current one is appropriate here may be judged when those are written; if that is done well, probably the main kinds will have been mentioned or described in one or another section, and the list will become redundant. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure
Talk:Republicans for Choice

message: Why is the Democrats for life page so much bigger? The Republican 23:30, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What The Hell?!?! 

message: The claims made in this article either need to referenced or removed.  The whole article has the tone of a press release.  It also needs to be more objective:  I quote, "Ultimately they believe in a GOP that helps get the government out of the boardroom and the bedroom."  This slogan sounds more like libertarian campaign propaganda, than an encyclopedic article. Jsniessen (talk) 15:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referenced or removed?
Talk:Concert dance

message: Shouldn't performance dance be the main article? In my opinion, concert dance sounds like dance styles that are only fit for large performances, often commercial in nature, while performance dance to me also includes smaller exhibitions and performances. The latter has more hits on Google as well. Wintran 12:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I only chose to do it this way around because that was what the merge tag suggested. Kcordina  Talk  13:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see. I'll see if I can find a discussion of this somewhere, or else I might move this to performance dance if no-one objects. It's good that you performed the merging in any case. Wintran 13:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Main article

message: Here in NY (which is not the entire world of dance, but not so small either) this term is used exclusively as the redoubtable Paul foord writes, not least by Dance Theater Workshop. — Robert Greer (talk) 02:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dance theatre
Talk:Social dance

message: I'm not sure Scottish country dance clip is the best one to include. That particular dance is not mentioned anywhere in the article. idk. I like including a clip though. DancerEE (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the languages section, there is a link to the Dutch page Stijldansen. However, stijldansen is not the same as social dance. Stijldansen is the Dutch name for ballroom dancing plus latin standard dancing. Though these can be forms of social dance, the term is not equivalent. Perhaps it is wise to remove this link. I believe there is not an exact equivalent for the term social dance (a noun) in Dutch, but the combined verb 'sociaal dansen' is used on many websites to describe the activity of dancing as a social interaction.--Paarsevertaler (talk) 15:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: links to other languages
Talk:Participation dance

message: :A funny version of the above (observed during a folk Polka mixer in Lithuania): After some dancing the caller calls: "Guys inside (the circle), gals outside. Gals continue dancing, guys groom themselves." Then the caller calls "Guys, grab yourselves a pair". Then he calls: "Now gals inside, guys outside." (A pause of suspense...) "Gals continue dancing, guys groom themselves." (Got it? :-)...
No, I don't get it. Is the point that the participants expect that the caller is going to tell the men to dance with each other (but he doesn't actually do so)? If so, I don't understand how this would be understood. --Metropolitan90 19:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "get it". It was written long ago when I was not that bureaucratic. The point of joke is that the symmetry is broken: in both cases girls dance while boyz do nothing despite changing places). This kind of humour is common in  a number of other folk dance forms. It is seen, e.g., in an episode from "Dance with Me": in one scene of Ruby and Rafael dancing he pretends as if he sits and smokes while she is dancing. `'mikka (t) 15:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain the folk polka mixer
Talk:Contemporary ballet

message: This article needs a great amount of cleanup and expansion. However, I have never formally studied modern ballet and have no sources. If anyone could clean this up to adhere with encyclopedic tone, source it, add images, and expand it, it would be greatly improved and also appreciated. --Keitei (talk) 18:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Hi, everyone (especially Keitei and E@L) -- I've just renamed the article (from "modern ballet" to "contemporary ballet"), expanded it, cleaned it up, and added the image of the ridiculously beautiful Drew Jacoby. I'll be adding more soon, as more information comes in! Thanks to all, Emmegan 02:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be useful to explain if there is a relationship of contempoary ballet to contemporary dance. Maybe as a see also. Paul foord 10:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Hello!  I'd like to merge this article with the main ballet article.  I plan to do so unless I hear otherwise.  Slhogan94 19:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: P-nut-buh-tuh 21:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with main ballet article

message: Paul foord (talk) 06:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed tag to merge with neoclassical ballet - no rationale presented

message: Added editing banners to two subsections that need more inline citations. --SpiritedMichelle (talk) 02:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added editing banners
Talk:Russian ballet

message: Is this a legitimate article? What is it about? Is this "Vaganova & Friends"?--tufkaa 21:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Legitimate article

message: This article made my jaw drop when I read it, and I'll go ahead an quote sections that are so horribly WRONG in order to justify why this article need an accurate re-write- 
"It has very impressive upper bodywork, with extra attention focused on the "line" of the dancer. In comparison with English or French styles, the Russian method is more extreme, with higher arabesques and longer bodylines. The style is often considered forceful and showy. An ideal look for all ballet dancers, and not just Russian dancers, is a long neck, legs, and arms. They are flexible, slim, and strong with a short torso." -Let me start by saying the reference to the more "higher extensions" and "longer bodies", etc. is a VERY recent evolution that has come to the ballet in Russia, and is a natural progession of balet evolution that has nothing to do with Russian ballet. Not 20 years ago dancers on the Russian stage looked very different. But even with all this, we have no definition of "Russian Ballet". 
Again, this quote has nothing to do with defining "Russian Ballet" - "Ballet today in the United States was partly adopted from the Russian influence. The New York City Ballet was co-founded by a man named George Balanchine. A key dancer from Moscow named Mikhail Mordkin started the company that later was called American Ballet Theatre."
"Many ballet instructors were poor in Russia so companies like Sergei Diaghilev’s Ballet Russes went on tours in Western Europe promoting and making money for the company." - This is not true - when the Ballet Russe was founded ballet dancers and instructors in Russia were anything but poor. And again, we have no definition of Russian Ballet.
"The Russian Ballet Company was based in Moscow at the Bolshoi Theatre, and it was founded in 1776." - the bolshoi theatre was finished in this year, if memory serves. The ballet of Russia however was first established in 1738 by the Empress Anna.
I dont know what this is supposed to mean, but it was not true then and it is not true now - "The Bolshoi had a contemporary and well balanced style it also had symphonic music and a dramatic action. Russian Ballet is still appreciated in the U.S. today." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrlopez2681 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My complete deletion of most of this article -  

message: What kind of article is this?
Alreadytaken4536 (talk) 01:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention ANYWHERE of notable Russian ballets?
Talk:French ballet

message: There is an incorrect blending of étoiles and principal dancers in the following: "... he (Nureyev) formed and named a whole generation of young principals ("Étoiles"), called the Nureyev Babies...." A dancer need not be a principal to be annointed étoile, and Sylvie Guillem was not. — Robert Greer (talk) 13:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''étoile'' vs. principal
Talk:ʻEwa Beach, Hawaii

message: When providing numerical data it is important to cite a source.  Somehow, I do not think you did the counting or were keeping track.  Also, a majority of the growth on the 'Ewa Plain has been in Kapolei, not 'Ewa Beach.  I am unclear how these areas are treated by the Census, but seems likely that Kapolei will become a separate census tract at some point. But it is somewhat misleading to attribute all of that growth to 'Ewa Beach (if that is the case, although there certainly have been many housing projects in both places) - Marshman 23:39, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  2004 Census Estimate
Talk:La Sylphide

message: This article perpetrates the usual nonsense of conflating the real La Sylphide—Filippo Taglioni's 1832  Paris ballet with music by  Jean-Madeleine Schneitzhoeffer—with August Bournonville's 1836 Royal Danish ballet with music by  Herman Løvenskjold.
Copenhagen-born Bournonville,  a Dane, created a ballet in Denmark with a Danish tile: Sylfiden. There is no reason whatsoever for giving it the French title La Sylphide, unless one is a French writer writing in French. 
208.87.248.162 (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the French title 'La Sylphide'??

message: I read all of this with surprise, as I've seen Kobborg's production in London in 2005 and also this year (2023) in Sarasota.  Kobborg's version is not new choreography.  There are a few interpolations - I have changed the wording to one more accurate and enumerated what the interpolations were.  I also removed the last sentence, because everything in it was factually incorrect:  There is no "cliffhanger" ending.  That's a misinterpretation of the Kommersant review.  Sorella Englund, who did the part in Denmark for years before this production, *sometimes* used to show traces of a tulle sylph skirt under her rags at the very end, to suggest that Madge was a "broken" sylph, but that was as much Englund as Kobborg.  Other times she did not, and other sylphs don't do it - neither did in '23.  The ending, as done in '23, was largely the same as in all Danish productions.  The "young" Madge was also an accident of casting, not specific to the production's interpretation.  In '05 he used Englund, who played Madge as older, and Deirdre Chapman, who was younger.  In '23 he used a man, Ricki Bertoni, who played Madge as weathered, and Lauren Ostrander, who was younger.  So age is a variable factor, not intrinsic to the interpretation of the production. 108.21.32.29 (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The comments about Kobborg's version
Template talk:Euronext

message: As per the precedent of Template:Nasdaq & Template:Ndaq, Template:Tsx & Template:Tsx2, and Template:Nyse and Template:Nyse2, I have created Template:Euronext2 for use in instances when auto-categorization to :Category:Companies listed on the Euronext exchanges is not desirable. Kurieeto 23:43, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Awsome, good move. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 00:16, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Little Wolf

message: Of course his name wasn't "Little Wolf", just like that in English; it must have been a transation from his language.  Let's have that word here, along with an explicit statement of whether that word means, "Small Wolf" per se or "Coyote", a species which is so close to a wolf that it interbreeds with them and is basically just a small version of the Canis lupus. Chrisrus (talk) 05:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and meaning 
Talk:Webelos

message: "Adults who have earned the Arrow of Light are entitled to wear a knot on their uniform. This is the only award from Cub Scouting that is still worn on uniforms at the Boy Scout and Adult level."
Is is not true any more that Cubs who earn their religious emblem can wear the corresponding square knot patch on their scout and adult uniform? GUllman 23:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, most, if not all, religious awards have a cub and a scouting version, and many of the religious awards cannot be earned while a cub scout. That being said, if a cub earned his religious award as a cub, he could wear it as a youth and an adult. However, this award isn't limited to cub scouting, which is why I feel it should not be listed in the article ArrowmanCoder 23:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's a question of the interpretation of the phrase "from Cub Scouting". The quote does appear to be taken word for word from the Virtual Cub Leader's Handbook. But, although the religious emblems are given by the various religions, so they don't actually "come from" the Cub Scouts of America, ... they can be earned while a Cub Scout, the award may be worn on the Cub uniform, and they have a corresponding knot patch for the adult uniform. So that's why I would tell people the religious emblem knot and the Arrow of Light knot that I wore as an adult were both "from Cub Scouting". GUllman 03:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, the recruiter patch when earned as a cub may be worn into Boy Scouting. With this and the religious award, I have revised by opinion and have reverted the article to reflect that. ArrowmanCoder 22:55, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

message: *Favor-this article has the vast bulk of information, and the other article has the more specific title and graphics-both would benefit from a merge. Chris 23:54, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: See Portal talk:Scouting#Webelos for details and any discussion.  Thanks 66.167.138.194 09:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer a redirect
Talk:Lost and Found (Will Smith album)

message: The correct title of this album is Lost and Found and not Lost & Found (note the ampersand). Cparker 05:22, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Discrepancy 

message: Is there any reference stating that the bonus track for this album is called "Bonus Track 1" or "Coming to the Stage"? The official discography page at http://www.willsmith.com/music/ lists this track as "Switch ...Reggae Remix (feat. Elephant Man)". Therefore, I'm changing the listing here to match. Cparker 05:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus Track 

message: This page was moved as a result of a move request, retained at Talk:Lost and Found (Mudvayne album)#Requested move #2 (Will Smith album).  —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved
Talk:King–Crane Commission

message: I'm writing a paper on the King-Crane Commission right now (no, I didn't come here for research, I was hoping that Crane's article would have a biographical tidbit, and I followed the link out of curiousity) and if I have any will to think about the Commission after tomorrow afternoon, I'll see what I can do. Stilgar135 21:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: this article contains clear evidence of bias, most strinkingly under the heading 'The Koenig Memorandum (zionisms solution)', which implies that Zionism seeks to terrorise and murder Arabs. the rest of the article portrays the King-Crane commission as an authoratative and comprehensive international commission -- a description disputed by virtually all scholars, particularly because Crane was a notorious anti-Semite who printed and distributed copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and met with and praised Adolf Hitler. (even a simple web search turns up Crane's name in Robert Michael's A Concise History of American Antisemitism, p. 129). in short, someone needs to improve this article to reflect better standards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.166.160 (talk) 15:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: a further note -- i just realised that the whole 'Koenig' section was a work of recent vandalism and i have removed it. however, the rest of the article still needs NPOV improvement. 89.139.166.160 (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issues 

message: If I am not mistaken, the report was mostly considering, and to some degree supporting, the idea of an Amereican mandate over Asia Minor, Istanbul and Armenia, there was no mention of an "idependent Armenian state" as this article claims or implies.  Unless there is a sepcific reference to specific wording in the report, this should be corrected. --173.77.168.53 (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mandate or Independence 

message: I realize that the Zionist section will be controversial.  I encourage you to change the section to include more Jewish voices.  I realize as it stands the section is biased.  I would love some help to change that!BlockCrew (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 Work 

message: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv12/ch10 Selfstudier (talk) 21:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref