lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Merozoite surface protein

message: I found these sources and think that they provide comprehensive information that would improve this article:
*N-Terminal Plasmodium vivax Merozoite Surface Protein-1, a Potential Subunit for Malaria Vivax Vaccine
*Merozoite surface proteins in red blood cell invasion, immunity and vaccines against malaria.
*Suramin & suramin analogues inhibit merozoite surface protein-1 secondary processing and erythrocyte invasion by the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.
*Designing malaria vaccines to circumvent antigen variability.
*The carboxy-terminus of merozoite surface protein 1: structure, specific antibodies and immunity to malaria.
*Signaling Strategies of Malaria Parasite for Its Survival, Proliferation, and Infection during Erythrocytic Stage.
Any feedback would be welcome Cedombroski (talk) 23:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding New Information
Talk:Yaizu

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Jerm (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yaizu, Shizuoka →  – no disambiguation. Gryffindor (talk) 22:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 January 2022
Category talk:Scandals

message: This is the text defining what constitutes a scandal for the purposes of category inclusion:
: A scandal may be based on reality, or the product of false allegations. Inclusion in this category does not imply guilt, but rather that a scandal (whether justified or not) has taken place.
The wording above is a little ambiguous.  Is it the case that an event which is the product of false allegations which are widely believed is a "scandal", or does the allegations have to be true? --Saforrest 21:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The category is POV. Weasel words describe IMO. Student7 02:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate the improved definition, but it still leaves the category as subjective, not objective. The politician you support is a "scandal." The politician I support (of course), is not one. Or guilty of one. Purely subjective. If you are a Democrat, Clinton acted "normally". If you are Republican, he acted "scandalously." (Just as easy to find a reverse case). Student7 (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Someone has erased the definition as "unnecessary." While I would prefer a tighter definition, I think that no definition is worse and invites more junk that we should have in what is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. Student7 (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of scandal
Talk:Big Hair & Baseball

message: Was it the top or the bottom of the ninth (or the bottom of an extra inning) when Moseby caught the ball?  I say this because:
* If it was the top of the ninth, then:
** The Yankees would have been batting (the Red Sox, being the home team, would have had last bats), and, assuming the catch would have been the third out, either:
*** If the game was tied or the Yankees were leading, then the game would continue into the bottom of the ninth.
*** Or, if the Red Sox were leading, the game would be over and the Red Sox would win.
** A home run would in any case have resulted in the top of the ninth continuing.
* Otherwise, if it was the bottom of the ninth (or an extra inning):
** A catch, if the third out, would mean:
*** The Yankees would win if they were ahead
*** Or, the game would continue to an(other) extra inning of the game were tied.  (The game would already be over had the Red Sox been leading.)
** A home run would mean:
*** The Red Sox would win IF AND ONLY IF that would put them into the lead.
*** Otherwise, the game would continue.
What I am saying is that the Yankees (being the away team, who does not have last bats) could only possibly win by retiring the Red Sox in the bottom of the ninth (or an extra) inning.  Only the Red Sox could win on a home run.
Finally, the game would have to continue on a foul ball, as runners are not permitted to advance in that case.
Hallpriest9 21:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia & Goofs
Talk:Streptavidin

message: streptavidin has four 15kDa subunits making it 60kDa not 53kDa Rosalspot (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  molecular weight 

message: It is impossible for avidin and streptavidin to share 30% aa identity and not be evolutionarily related.  One of these two statements must be false.  "Avidin ... is evolutionarily unrelated to streptavidin ... avidin only has 30% sequence identity to streptavidin"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.127.150.29 (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  relationship of avidin to streptavidin
Talk:Ross Creek Landing

message: Too focused on the golf course. RJFJR 20:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I can't find any evidence that this is actually a state park. It's not listed on the official Tennessee state parks websites (including the one linked in the article) and other websites (such as this site for the golfcourse and this golf directory listing) appear to describe it as a private golf course (but open to the public). --Orlady (talk) 19:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, the state owned the golf course at one time, but has recently sold it to a private owner(article).  I'm not sure if it was a state park even then— it may have been maintained by a nearby state park.  The other four Bear Trace courses in Tennessee are at state parks (Cumberland, Tims Ford, Chickasaw, and Harrison Bay), which may have caused the confusion.  I recommend removing "state park" from the article title.  Bms4880 (talk) 21:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I've edited the article and will rename it. --Orlady (talk) 21:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, this is an odd one. Apparently it was once a state park, as I find it mentioned as such a few times on the state website (Google search). The TN state accessibility guide includes it, as well as a link to where an official page used to be.  — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed
Talk:Sulfation

message: This article should probably be split into Sulfation (batteries) and Sulfation (biology). --16:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it might be better to leave this article for sulfation in chemistry and biology, and put the battery-related stuff somewhere else. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree, perhaps merge into lead-acid battery since the concept is particular to that chemistry. Reswobslc (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Done.  Now the chemists need to take over. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?

message: Based on many sources, sulfation is the replacement of a hydrogen atom of an organic compound with a sulfate (-OSO2OH) functional group, while sulfonation is the replacement of a hydrogen atom of an organic compound with a sulfonic acid (-SO3H) functional group. Hence aren't they supposed to be different? If so distinct pages should be created and searching "sulfonation" should not be redirected to the sulfation page, and instead redirected to "aromatic sulfonation".Epicity95 (talk) 13:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sulfation vs. Sulfonation
Talk:Tafazzin

message: Tafazzin, a.k.a. TAZ, is not involved in the hippo pathway, as it has been written on the article. Probably, there was a misunderstanding, because of WWTR1, the protein involved in the hippo pathway, has been also called TAZ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.14.102.13 (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tafazzin, a.k.a. TAZ
Talk:Thymopoietin

message: There are contradictory statements in this article !
The follwing 2 sentences contradict each other:
Thymopoietin is a protein involved in the induction of CD90 in the thymus
vs
"Given the nuclear localization of the three TMPO isoforms, it is unlikely that these proteins play any role in CD90 induction."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordelicht (talk • contribs) 22:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Top7

message: a protein has per definition a function in the cell. What is the designed function of this protein?--92.202.70.19 (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  function 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nfrontella12 (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I
Talk:Prefoldin subunit 3

message: Numerous paragraphs in the current version of the article have been lifted from different sources. I will list these as soon as I can track most of them down. – Liveste 07:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Article revision has been completed. More than half of the content of the previous version was related to von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor rather than VBP1; this content has been removed and the article has become a stub. Referencing, wikification and removal of copyvio have also been completed. Cheers. – Liveste 04:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article revision
Talk:Jahaziel

message: I'm not sure this man is considered a prophet: , . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadav1 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are several Jahaziah's in the Bible, and none of them are identified by the title "prophet." Alephb (talk) 01:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Magazines

message: Is there any particular reason Shonen Jump isn't listed here? If not, I've got several back issues that I can list. —Dinoguy1000 18:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Before I forget, that's U.S. Shonen Jumps, not Japanese... =P —Dinoguy1000 18:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say mostly because no one has added.  If it has content besides just the manga chapters, like Shojo Beat does, I think it be great if it were listed. AnmaFinotera (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, that makes sense. There's reviews and stuff like that in many of the issues, I'll start listing them at some point. —Dinoguy1000 23:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shonen Jump 

message: I intend to create the page :Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Magazines/Newtype USA/2008 but I will not be using tables. (See ) I am leaving the page numbers in parentheses and annotations for error checking. The page can be edited to conform to the style of the others but I would like you to consider leaving the section headers in place. If you have any questions please ask them here. If I don't respond within a day or so leave a  on my talk page. Thank you. – allen四names 22:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: with this edit. – allen四names 22:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newtype USA (2008) 

message: Although GameFan magazine is primarily a video game magazine, it also began (in 1996) to feature a subsection entitled "AnimeFan" that reviews Anime and Manga. This magazine is currently included in WP:VG's Reference Library (here). I'm not sure how this would be best handled, but it seems like this material should also be linked from this reference library as it would help demonstrate notability and establish references for articles covered by WP:ANIME. Anyway I just wanted to bring this to your attention. Cheers. -Thibbs (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: with this edit. -Thibbs (talk) 17:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: GameFan Magazine

message: Would there be any objection if I moved the listing for Hyper magazine from the Magazine Archive here to WP:VG's Reference Library Project? Unlike serials like Newtype, Otaku USA, and the G's Festival variants which emphasize anime/manga while covering video games, Hyper is primarily a video game magazine that also covers anime/manga so I think it would make the most sense. Then we could leave a cross-reference to it just as we did with the GameFan listing. If there are no objections I'll move the page. -Thibbs (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyper
Talk:Janko group J1

message: I would like to see more somewhere about the G2 groups. Leonard Dickson reported their discovery in 1905, but for some reason did not go on to get results on the other exceptional Lie algebras. That was done by Chevalley in 1955. Why 50 years?
I thought the best place to cite Dickson's paper was in the article on groups of Lie type.
These groups occur elsewhere. Conway 1 contains G2(4), which in turn contains the Hall-Janko group. G2(2) is not simple, but contains the simple group of order 6048, with index 2.
I wonder whether J1 has been found in G2(19). Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX 23:50, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Empire!

message: For those of you who are unaware, this isn't the only game called Empire! Well, actually, there is only one called "'Empire!'", but the point I'm trying to make is there are loads of games with Empire as (and in) the title. As you might imagine, this can cause some trouble when choosing what to name each article and how to disambiguate them, and has, in practice, led to some rather unusual choices in some cases... Since it's probably best to consider all the games with Empire as the main part of the title at once when deciding how to rename a few of the worst offenders, this game has been included in a discussion on how to name (and rename) Empire titled games here. Please join in the discussion there and add any thoughts, comments or suggestions you may have. Thanks! --xensyriaT 15:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire Games Renaming Discussion
Talk:Dragon Wing

message: Main Charecters
Added information to main charecter section --Miconis 22:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mike Penner

message: An IP editor changed the male pronouns in the article to female pronouns, this is incorrect per MOS:IDENTITY, because Penner returned to his original name and was identifying as male at the time of his death we should be refering to him as male. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  the same incorrect edit was made in early 2014 from an anonymous account - i have undone this edit for the reasons of MOS:IDENTITY. It's an awkward one since Penner clearly identified as Daniels, a female, and transexual, for a significant period. But it's hard to ignore that within a year of transition he had resumed his former name and male identification. I think the article has to respect that, notwithstanding the understandable and correct desire to respect transexual identity more generally, in this specific case, a reversion to the male pronoun seems the only logical outworking of Penner's own later decisions.
Mpjmcevoybeta (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronouns 

message: I suggest we remove any transgender categories from this person's article. He is NOT transgender; he's someone who briefly thought by mistake he was transgender. Georgia guy (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.37.10 (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transgender 
Talk:Ninemile Canyon (Utah)

message: After looking at some of the other b-rated articles, I feel like this one is at least to that point. It's almost a shame it hasn't been assessed sooner. The importance scale I think is mid, as it's very relevant to the Native American culture, even if it doesn't cover a large geographic area. Jaromhuff21 (talk) 03:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm flattered, but I can't agree with your assessment. I don't think it meets all of the B-Class criteria, particularly 2, 3, and 5. I think it still needs a lot of expansion. The lead is very short, not really a proper lead yet. It doesn't summarize the article itself. There should be much more in the History section. The article also needs one or more sections on the canyon's natural history, geology, flora and fauna. And although I haven't seen a infobox specifically for canyons and gorges, this article could really use an infobox. What this article really needs is not praise, but help. I've tried to attract attention to it on WikiProject Utah, but no one has worked on it but me yet. I'm not good enough to get this article where it needs to be on my own. I've been meaning to do a complete rewrite of the Current issues section, which needs reorganization and updating, particularly about Bill Barrett Corporation's recent activities, but it's a daunting task. I have a couple of good sources to use; I'll get around to it. I'd just really like some help from better editors. Ntsimp (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, I can see all those points. If you don't mind the help, I'll see what I can add, but definitely defer to you since she's kind of your baby.Jaromhuff21 (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Applied academics

message: Currently most of this article is a copy from Hocking Colleges page.  I know this isn't good.  I am going to find out if Hocking College is willing to release their glossary "open source", and hence there will be no copyright infringement.
Also, I think the article should have some information about Theory vs. Practice, and how applied academic brings both together.   But I'm not quite sure how to write this in, and source it completely.  I think W. Edward Deming's quote: 
"Experience by itself teaches nothing...Without theory, experience has no meaning. Without theory, one has no questions to ask. Hence without theory there is no learning. " is important to reference, as it shows why industry and commercial entities need theory, but I also want to find sources to show why it is so critical that academia relates theory to the practical world.
In many ways, to me "applied academics" seems like the bridge between vocational education, and traditional education, bringing the best of both worlds. --Pordaria 22:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fylde RFC

message: I have added the tags about there being no sources and not being verified to this article, as even though the information is no doubt correct, it was merely copied and pasted from the clubs official site section on the clubs history. I have tried to amend it so that it is not just a direct copy of that site. There were little or no wiki links, partly due to the content merely being a copy and paste. 
However, third party sources are needed, which I am sure there will be online with the BBC, Blackpool Gazette etc, which is why I placed the tags so as to improve the article. An infobox would also improve the article considerably, as would pictures (and not pictures from the official site) of the ground and the club in action. ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 22:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Lightning-prediction system

message: The description is very vague and hard to understand.  Can you clarify it? Thanks nadav
:Jesus Christ...not merely vague. Fucking atrocious and clearly either written by a PR man or a Ph.D-level electrical engineer. It is almost unreadable. I will fix it. Bullzeye contribs 03:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: This page keeps going back & forth from "lightning prediction system" to "lightning-prediction system", but won't die.  -- G4 reason for speedy deletion.
It is clearly marketing one specific product, sourcing as a reference its use at a specific location.  The subject matter is clearly & extensively covered here... Lightning_detection so what is the point of this page?  I would suggest moving anything of unbiased value or use over there promptly.
It is an obvious candidate for Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion and I will tag it for such.
It is a clear violation WP:NOTFORPROMOTION -- G11 reason for speedy deletion.
Borealdreams (talk) 01:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I notified the original author on their talk page, and there has been no response.  I am tagging the article for Speedy Deletion as the article's subject matter is covered in more depth without single sourcing to one specific product here.  Borealdreams (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notification for Speedy Deletion Tag 

message: WP:UNSOURCED ENTIRE ARTICLE Njlaw (talk)Njlaw  —Preceding undated comment added 12:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge
Talk:Atrial natriuretic peptide

message: This article is severely flawed. ANP is secreted in response to high BP and high BV. Not low.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.182.104 (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We've get 3 statements about animal NP in this section - two are referenced with primary research, one is unreferenced. Delete? IiKkEe (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other natriuretic factors 

message: My recent edits of this Page - the Lead, and the Physiologic effects section - declare that all effects of ANP are caused by volume changes mediated by the kidney: this is clearly incorrect. Bear with me: I will re-edit these two parts reflecting current knowledge as soon as I finish digesting a 40 page online chapter on the subject from Seldin's textbook The kidney (2013). IiKkEe (talk) 00:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  My recent edits 

message: Lesson learned: I thought paraphrasing with attribution of source was OK. IiKkEe (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: Neurologist Guy Leshziner describes in "The Nocturnal Brain" Page 83 (hardback) that ANP is produced in spikes many times a night in relation to sleep apnea / apnoea.  This is an important but incredibly poorly understood symptom of sleep apnea/apnoea, and a major issue: sleep is disturbed by apnea/apnoea which causes ANP spikes which disturb sleep which causes worse symptoms:  I am medically trained and had no idea the heart secreted hormones to control blood volume thinking it was done through kidneys: Drs should be aware patients presenting with "I snore and have to get up in the night to pee so much it disturbs my sleep" likely have *severe* sleep apnea/apnoea and are at high risk.  Can someone please add this ? Thanks  92.1.65.238 (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to sleep apnea / apnoea
Talk:Thermogenin

message: Birds are missing UCP1 and have developed other solutions for heat generation. Is this a possible explanation to why the might have surved while all other dinosaurs did not 65 miljon years ago?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.226.255.29 (talk) 21:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I will be working on adding to this page over the next month or two for a student project for my Biophysics class. --Djinn32 (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Working Project
Talk:Gastrin

message: may well be what we are looking for. JFW | T@lk 06:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing and expansion 

message: Gastrin in GI diseases. Reading. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.006 JFW | T@lk 20:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2005.06.025 - gastrin and cancer. JFW | T@lk 20:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

text: doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.021 - another. JFW | T@lk 21:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Another one

message: The Article states among the functions that "[gastrin] Plays a role in the relaxation of the ileocecal valve.[7]".
However in reference #7 the relaxation of the ileocecal valve is attributed to the direct effect of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) instead of gastrin itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.6.168.249 (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ERROR in Function?