lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Outline of relationships

message: Demisexual is listed on the page under sexual orientation, it does not link to a page.  There is no information about demisexuality in the DSM, on the APA site, APA publications or the BPS equivalents.  I think it should be removed from the list because, at the very least, there is no page attached to it, but also because there is no information about it in any peer reviewed psychological publication that I could find.  So unless someone has an issue and can provide some type of literature, I'm going to remove it from the list. 24.222.188.19 (talk) 01:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Demisexual?

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:European Committee for Interoperable Systems

message: That's not about European Union. It has "European" in its name, it has a .eu nic but that doesn't mean it has any relationship with the European Union. And even the website doesn't try to say such a thing.
As such, the mention of "This article about the European Union is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it." should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.128.96.193 (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with the European Union 
Talk:Outline of thought

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines 

message: Maybe it just looks like it's thinking. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do we know the chimpanzee is thinking? 

message: Because if I'm angry I think different thoughts than when I'm calm. Shouldn't we therefore add Emotion to Aspects of the thinker?  84.119.3.225 (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't emotion influence thinking?
Talk:Outline of transport

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: Why does the ship transport section list El Nino?  The connection seems pretty tenuous; why not Gulf Stream or even the Sun (since without it there'd be no wind, hence no wind-powered ships)?
SeanWillard (talk) 18:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship transport 

message: New stub lists a few fictional forms of transport - seems to me that this content would be better in this article which already has a section including fictional transport, with not much overlap if any. PamD (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As an alternative, it could be put back in Animal-powered transport from where it was split...-- EdJogg (talk) 08:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge proposal 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Outline of trigonometry

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines 

message: List of trigonometry topics is a list in outline form, same structure as this article, so there doesn't appear to value in having two separate list articles for the same topic. It appears reasonable to merge the two articles to here. ~Kvng (talk) 22:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[List of trigonometry topics]]
Talk:Outline of vehicles

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Outline of zoology

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: # is this list necessary? It is simply alphabetical, not at all hierarchical. see Wikipedia:Outlines#How to develop a good outline.
# if so, can it be placed into columns to better utilize space?
# if kept, there should be clearly defined inclusion criteria. "Well-known types" is extremely subjective, and the list already appears somewhat biased and arbitrary: Arrow crab and Xerinae are nowhere near as well-known as Duck and Snake. --Animalparty-- (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding  "Animals (by common name)" 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:12, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:List of social sciences

message: The disciplines listed include history and philosophy as well as others which are actually Humanities. This directly contradicts the List of academic disciplines for the Humanities article which lists history and philosphy as Humanities (although that article has major issues in listing many other disciplines not in the Huamanities as well).
Agreed. History and philosophy are not considered social sciences, even though sometimes these things can be lumped into different departments that are more administrative than academic. 24.46.248.161 (talk) 15:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it is inconsistent with other listings on Wikipedia, although history can be considered a social science (see the explanation on the Social Sciences page).  What's more concerning is that this list of the Social Sciences differs completely from the list within that article, which also differs from the list in the box under "Branches" in the same article.  Several items from the list on this page—Environment, International Relations, Internet, Media, Politics, Social Psychology, and Social Work—are not discussed at all in the main Social Work article. Obstruction (talk) 17:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discipline Listing Inaccurate 

message: Seems a list of topics, not an outline of the topic.82.171.225.84 (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is not an outline
Talk:Bridell

message: I read the UK section on hamlet (place) carefully and believe this is the right definition, rather than village. However, if there is an objection I have no strong views either way. Bridell may once have been considered a village, but has been rather superseded by nearby Penybryn which has seen a significant amount of development in the last 30 years. Tony Holkham (talk) 19:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:4BC

message: We need some new logos for the Fairfax radio stations we should keep the old ones as historical reference, We need new logos for i.e. 3AW, 4BC etc
They need to be compliant with Wikipedia logo usage policies, and should be placed on the appropriate articles as Southern Cross broadcasting is no longer
Adrian90 (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logos needed 

message: I do not believe that "1116 4BC welcomes your calls anytime on 13 13 32, SMS on 0427 13 13 32 or visit us online 4bc.com.au" is encyclopedic in any way !!!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocketrod1960 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 
Talk:Old Warren County Courthouse

message: Apears to be from here Lvklock (talk) 02:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut and Paste 

message: According to data from the Mississippi Department of Archives and History (MDAH), the organization which oversees the Mississippi Landmark program, there are actually two buildings which are "Warren County Courthouses" in Vicksburg. One is located at 1008 Cherry St, and the other is at 1009 Cherry St; the former is on the NRHP, but the latter is not. The former was apparently used before 1939, and the latter was either used only from 1939-1940 or from 1939-present (the MS Landmark data is a bit unclear). From these data, it is quite clear that the "Old Warren County Courthouse" is separate from the "Warren County Courthouse," so I don't think Warren County Courthouse should redirect here. I think this page should be moved to Old Warren County Courthouse, and this should be turned into a redirect. Warren County Courthouse should no longer be a redirect; it should be converted into an article for the second Mississippi Landmark. If there are no objections, I will go ahead with these actions. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 20:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are actually two Warren County Courthouses in this city
Category talk:Bemani games

message: * :Category:Bemani games to :Category:Bemani – C2D: Per Bemani ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed speedy move request 

message: * :Category:Bemani games to :Category:Bemani – C2D: Per Bemani  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed speedy move request 2
Talk:Ranulf I de Soules

message: I realize that the reader might like to have more information, but I have researched this topic thoroughly and doubt that any more information will be found after nine centuries. This is about as complete as it can be. Consequently, I  respectfully request that this article be upgraded from Start class. Inver471ness (talk) 22:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you want a peer review or a re-assessment of the its class on the assessment scale. If you want a Peer review, I suggest WP:PR where you need to create a subpage where other users will suggest improvements. If you want a reassessment, read-on. The milhist B-class criteria are great for judging its class. So, if we look at this, it does meet the B-class criteria, it does have references, it does cover the topic adequately, it has a structure, it is grammatically correct, it doesn't have images though this is accepatable given the time period. As such, I have assessed it as B for the Biography project. Regards. Woody (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment?
Talk:List of In the Groove musicians

message: I've been searching for awhile to figure out who is Onyx, and where I can find more of his music. Does anybody have any information on him? Gforce20 (talk) 18:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect it's another KaW pseudonym, based on this page which lists other KaW pseudonyms as all of his "recommended" artists, and lists his location as "battle ground, wa", the same location as all of those recommended artists. That KaW is a VERY prolific guy! :) Luvcraft (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Onyx?
Talk:Donnchadh of Argyll

message: The panel at top right of this bio seems to confuse Duncan (ca 1190-ca 1247) with his grandson Duncan, brother of Alexander/Alastair McDougal, Lord of Lorn, called also 'de Ergadia'.  Sir Alexander flourished ca 1270 to 1310 when he died.  He was succeeded by John/Ewen who died ca 1317.  John was of age in 1291 as he homaged to Edward I then.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.68.132.21 (talk • contribs) 
:Hello. I've moved your comment from the article mainspace to here. I've also removed the 'term' bit from the infobox ("1310–1316"). Is there anything else that should be taken care of?--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note
Talk:Viña del Mar University

message: The editor mixed up Universidad de Viña del Mar with Spanish Wikipedia: Universidad del Mar (Chile) in the paragraph that reads "In 2014, a Chilean activist.." 
References: 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/05/19/chilean-artist-steals-and-destroys-500-million-worth-of-student-debt-papers/
http://www.democracynow.org/2014/5/23/exclusive_chilean_robin_hood_artist_known
All these English language references point to the right University name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.36.57.130 (talk) 07:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph and references to protest demonstration are mixed up
Talk:Noble Warriors

message: It was a useful section. I brought it back because there are no character analyses on the related pages, and the characters are not notable enough for their own pages. Also, the radiance section was deleted. Radiance is hardly mentioned anywhere else, so it is good to have a description of it.
0-Jenny-0 10:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the 'main characters' section deleted?
Talk:Pontifical Catholic University of Chile

message: Is it not a bit superficial to mention international and/or national rankings in the lead? I propose to mention these ranking in a section and keep in the lead something more wide about its prominent role, prestige or influence. Wikipedia should not fall into our times ranking-mania. Note that I by no way pretend to diminish the university's standing, I just think its more appropriate to express it more directly and frankly and not indirectly suggesting so by a ranking.  Dentren | Talk 16:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rankings in the lead

message: why changing the name? The university eexplicitely does not have an official English name and should be referred in Englisch as "Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile". That's how wikipedia usually deals with it in other cases e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vrije_Universiteit_Brussel, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vrije_Universiteit_Amsterdam, among many others. SFBB (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name in english
Wikipedia talk:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2004/Jimbo Wales for admin

message: Most of the following users were involved in the creation of this page. A few of the listed edits are extraneous. See also the history page for Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.
----
# (cur) (last)  . . 19:08, 1 Apr 2004 . . Fennec (Cut the Jimbo Wales proposal. Bye-bye. See BJAODN.)
# (cur) (last) . . m 18:49, 1 Apr 2004 . . Lir (=Jor; (18/14/1) ends 05:10, 5 April, 2004 (UTC)=)
# (cur) (last) . . 18:48, 1 Apr 2004 . . Lir (=Jimbo Wales; (x²/B≤π/∞ + { Sω | } - þ); ends 1 April 2004=)
# (cur) (last) . . m 18:33, 1 Apr 2004 . . Wik
# (cur) (last) . . m 18:30, 1 Apr 2004 . . Wik
# (cur) (last) . . m 18:30, 1 Apr 2004 . . Wik
# (cur) (last) . . m 18:29, 1 Apr 2004 . . Wik
# (cur) (last) . . 18:26, 1 Apr 2004 . . Maximus Rex (=User:Wikibob (1/7/2) ends 16:48, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:University of Harderwijk

message: OK, now the history starts with the university's poor reputation. But it should mention why the university was founded, more or less due to provincial rivalries after the founding of Leiden university etc. 2001:1C02:1990:A900:9DB3:ED56:B937:B3B7 (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More history