lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CDBurnerXP

message: http://www.cdburnerxp.se/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18526 
So I guess this article should be moved to CDBurnerXP now.
I don't think it would be against WP:COMMONNAME as Pro appears more like a sort of 'tag'. -- Execvator 13:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to CDBurnerXP? 

message: infobox software2
name             = CDBurnerXP
screenshot       = 
caption          = CDBurnerXP 4
operating_system = Microsoft Windows
genre            = CD/DVD authoring
license          = Freeware
website          = http://cdburnerxp.se/
Where is the info about the version ? Where is the "4.0.022.370" ??!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.57.241.62 (talk) 18:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the source of the _real_ infobox? 

message: There's an alternate download without the spyware that is offered on the site if one care to check in « other version ». - TulipVorlax 05:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate
Talk:Press

message: There doesn't seem to be an article on this. There are articles on journalism, publishing and printing but not one on the press. This is an important omission particularly as other articles, such as the Fourth Estate refer to it. It is more than just journalism or publishing. It is part of the political process in most democracies helping to frame, reflect and decide the public issues. AJKGordon 13:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press as in publishing / journalism
Talk:Bella Vista, Tucumán

message: This article seems to take a primarily negative view of its subject and may need improved neutrality. Please consider weight in terms of reporting controversy and negative allegations. --Moonriddengirl 13:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Hello everyone, I am new at Wikipedia and I'd like to meet someone with a good english to
help me to add neutrality to this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbigotes (talk • contribs) 18:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately no, I don't ahve access to instant messaging from this computer.  I understand Spanish fluently so I should be able to read the sources, as well.  Let me check in to them and give it a go on a rewrite, then you can tell me what you think or offer some suggestions? ɑʀкʏɑɴ 19:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New at this 

message: This article looks a lot better than the one I wrote, you obviously have a perfect english. Very nice.
I'd like to explain the thing about "vote selling" but it will be hard to find sources. When I find them I'll let you know. I guess people from wikipedia will see this article a lot better than before.
Thanks a lot for the translations. You gave it a better look.
Regards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbigotes (talk • contribs) 23:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks a lot 

message: Please take another look at the sources and the revisions I made. I think further revisions need to be made to clarify when the elections took place, when the city council was suspended. The introduction says that controversies date back to 1999, but there is no mention of anything prior to 2003.Vontrotta 22:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates unclear 
Talk:Cabbage patch

message: I have created a new page for Cabbage patch dance. Biscuittin 14:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In New Zealand the "Cabbage Patch", or more formally the "Vacant lot of Cabbages", is widely known as a conceptual, interventionist, environmental geurilla gardening art...
https://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2012/11/02/vacant-lot-of-cabbages-documentation-enters-te-papas-archives/ b'art homme  01:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "cabbage patch" an important moment in New Zealand art...
Talk:E85 in the United States

message: In the article's current form, the availability section on Florida states there are 12 E-85 stations while further down in another section the article states there are only 3 E-85 pumps there, which by pigeon hole means at most 3 stations.  This apparent contradiction needs resolving. Jon 14:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: I am doubting that the table even belongs on this page. The information shown is no longer near accurate. Unless someone can update this table, I think it should be removed all together.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.243.131.12 (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability Table 

message: I added a sentence defining E85 as a lead (copied from E85 but the intro needs to be improved. RJFJR (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead

message: Cost is subsized because it take more energy to refine than it saves as fuel. 98.144.238.191 (talk) 13:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Cost of E85
Talk:Cabbage Patch (dance)

message: Article moved from Cabbage patch. Biscuittin 14:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: I don't agree that there is "no sign of significant coverage". Google found 454,000 results. Biscuittin (talk) 09:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 
Template talk:Literacy

message: So, following Wikipedia's guidelines, I decided to Be Bold!, and created this template. I realize that in doing this, I've gone a bit afield of the intended scope, but I'm not exactly sure where. I'm still not sure of the scope, but hopefully this is a good start in any case. Hires an editor 15:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How did you choose the people to include in the "Major contributors to literacy" section?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlwelsh (talk • contribs) 01:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I used the "See Also" section of the main Literacy article as the basis for the template. I'm hoping that others will add on to this base. There were only two to start with, and their articles are short, and I added a third after looking around a bit, but the third person's article is short, too. I'm copying this discussion to the template's discussion page. Hires an editor 14:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template Created
Talk:History of Ukrainian nationality

message: Please do not speedily delete this page for its current lack of content. I am in the course of researching the historical background to ukrainian nationality for a course at university, and this is part of my final assessment. This is a work in progress that anyone can contribute to. Please be considerate as this will be added to surely but steadily. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zmiyeborecz (talk • contribs)  09:34, September 28, 2007
: I am interested in Ukrainian nationality (based on Ukrainian citizenship) today. --Тимур (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

message: This article seems like promoscow and antiukrainian propaganda! Author forgoted to tell and speel about Muscovy state till 1721. year and I believe this is not mistake! This "History of Ukrainian nationality" is not objective work, more like amater prorussian propaganda ... But, maybe I am wrong and author is right and work is objective? Read more about it! --93.138.18.209 (talk) 08:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems like antiukrainian propaganda
Talk:Boxcar function

message: The boxcar function is a function, not a probability distribution. It cannot be expressed "in terms of the uniform distribution" as the article says. Maybe it can be expressed in terms of the probability density function (pdf) of a uniformly distributed random variable. Even better would be to just give the formula and say that the pdf of a uniform random variable is a boxcar function.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.187.109.117 (talk) 15:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentioning the uniform distribution is misleading
Talk:Scottish Westminster constituencies

message: The article was created as part of an attempt to disentangle nunerous knots (ambiguities etc) in articles primarily about constituencies in Scotland (more or less as currently defined here). I wish I had something like the resources to attempt something similar for the UK as a whole, for all of its constituency countries, and for (as defined for Boundary Commission purposes) each of the regions of England. Laurel Bush 14:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creator's note 

message: Contents of Scottish Parliamentary Constituencies before 1918 seem now to be covered by Scottish Westminster constituencies, Scottish Westminster constituencies 1708 to 1832 and Scottish Westminster constituencies 1832 to 1868. Laurel Bush 14:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Army Apprentices School, Harrogate

message: Comments relating to personal involvement of author is not appropriate for wikipedia article.
Early years section deviates from early years and subject matter.
Updates subsection is not related to content
The comments on squadrons relate only to later years. For example Phillips squadron was a squadron within the college in addition to those listed (disbanded about 1976). The squadron membership was not always based upon the trades of the soldiers.
Globalvagrant (talk) 20:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on content  
Talk:Bobby Campbell (Northern Irish footballer)

message: Hiya, coming in as an uninvolved administrator.  I have no opinion on this article's content or title, but it is a concern that there is a battle with the article's title going on right now, especially because the editors engaged in this battle are not discussing their changes at talk.  Please see Wikipedia:Requested moves to review the process on how to deal with controversial moves, thanks. --Elonka 15:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And how did you come along Elonka, hate to think you were following someone. BigDunc 15:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs to be restored to its original name, and let those wishing to change it request a move. Mooretwin (talk) 00:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I personally don't care what this article is titled, but the "Northern Irish footballer" name seems to have been the most stable recently, so let's leave it at that for now.  Anyone wishing to move it from that title, please request it via WP:RM. --Elonka 00:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Move it to Bobby Campbell (b. 1956). GoodDay (talk) 14:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct format for a footballer would be Bobby Campbell (footballer born 1956), which is currently a redirect to this article, so we would need an admin to move it. GiantSnowman 14:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move wars

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. GoodDay (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Second season syndrome

message: Hi.
"Second season syndrome" may be a 'now-common phrase' in football parlance. It isn't. But it may be somewhere. I'm pretty sure it isn't anywhere, actually. In fact, I suspect that the author of this terrible article is the only person who is using it any longer.
In any case, whether it is a 'now-common phrase' — and it isn't — or not, it is not notable. Nor is it possible to verify this claim that it is a 'now-common phrase'. I could argue at length (though I don't have time to now) that the article is patent nonsense.
For these reasons and others, I recommend this article for deletion.
--pac  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Regwrekter (talk • contribs) 05:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. If you think this article should be deleted then check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion to learn how to do this. Personally, I think that this should be merged into sophomore slump, but that was opposed. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Penanggalan

message: : Penangglan is also known as balan-balan among local people in North Borneon state of Sabah. However, its rather different in nature as it can be both female or male.Ryan_Aldren 08:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no concrete source that there are male mananangal all of the sources read in Philippine National Library refers mananangal as female  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.53.114.169 (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional

message: I think the articles should actually be split, with the Penanggalan information moved over here. --Scottandrewhutchins 15:12, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But they are geographic/ethnic variants of an original entity? Could make for a future FA as it could be pretty substantial (?) cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, thanks for the pointer on that one. Got a ref as we're working up vampire for FA. I guess we can write a para describing all 3 and link to each there instead.cheers,  Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about Penanggalan and Manananggal, but I can make sure that Leyak has different cultural background as Balinese mostly is influenced by Hinduism while the Malaysian/Filipnos are not. I'm sure there are some reliable sources for Leyak, but I'm not an expert for that. — Indon (reply) — 01:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well to be honest I've checked out the description of the Balinese Leyak, and it seems to be the same as that of the Manananggal/Penanggalan. Plus I don't agree with your description of cultural backgrounds: both Malay and Filipino cultures have historically been as equally influenced by Hinduism as Balinese culture was (the Laguna Copperplate Inscription found in Luzon, Philippines confirms this), the only difference is that the Balinese are still Hindu while Malay and Filipino peoples are Muslim/Christian due to newer influences or colonization. Anak 1 21:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I'm going to remove the merge template from this article -- the proposal appears to be dead. -Dayv (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing merge proposal
Talk:Banksia Park International High School

message: Two of the awards separately mentioned in the article appear to be the same thing. The 2004 National Awards for Quality Schooling was source of both (1) the $10,000 grant identified as being for the Good Citizen Medal and (2) the status of being "highly commended" by the Australian Government for achievements in civics and citizenship. --Orlady (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, very good question and I think that you are right. I have refactored the paragraph which I think puts the situation fairly. Please rework further if its still not right. TerriersFan (talk) 01:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion needing to be resolved 
Talk:Willunga High School

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes
Talk:KQOB

message: Any speculation on why they dropped the BOB branding?  For the record, I don't care for name-based station branding but the radio biz refuses to consult with me.  I used to listen a lot more before Cumulus moved Inzinga/Spinozzi to WWLS and replaced them with syndicated crap.  Ah, well.  So goes the radio biz.  They still do a (pre-recorded, I'm sure) afternoon bit on BOB KQOB but it's not the same.  --plaws (talk) 16:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOB-FM
Talk:MS Windward

message: As you can see, the only freely licensed image we have is of this vessel is from when she was still the Norwegian Wind.  If anyone can get a good image of her in her new life as SuperStar Aquarius, it would add to the quality of this page. --OneCyclone 15:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of SuperStar Aquarius 

message: There is a difference within the text: was the original ship build for Kloster Cruises (first line) or for NCL (as described in the History lines) ? -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Techinically both are correct in a sense, as Kloster Cruise owned NCL and the ship. For clarity's sake, the history section text should be amended into something along the time lines of "built for Kloster Cruise for use under their NCl brand". — Kjet (talk · contribs) 12:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Build for ... ?
Talk:Canal Panda

message: Please try to keep the list of shows in alphabetic order, it makes consulting the list way easier and it stops looking like a mess... Lumi-chan (talk) 12:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Order

message: Both channels in Portugal and Spain are just happen to be owned by ultimately same company and share same name. Both countries aren't watching the same feed of Canal Panda (unlike Minimax in Central Europe). JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 07:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Staveless runes

message: This is a good article, but I found the going a little tough since I knew little about runes.  In particular, the following sentence is bewildering at first read-thru: "Enoksen notes that it appears from the title page of Johannes Bureus' runic ABC that Bureus had some understanding of the staveless runestones in 1611, but that this has been denied by virtually all runologists."  My brain said "Who's Enoksen?  Did I miss a reference to him earlier?"  and "what 'runic ABC'  ?" etc.  
A  graphic comparing a few "regular" runes and these staveless runes would help immensely.  Also phrases such as "The runes may look hard to recognize . . . " are not what one finds in an encyclopedia.  
Also, this entire article seems to be based on one book.  Are there any other sources???
Keep up the good work, Madman 21:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for telling me that you like the article :). I have added an illustration of the short-twig runes which was one of the two main types of the Younger Futhark. You'll find Enoksen's book, which was used as the source, under the heading named "references". The "runic ABC" may be worth an article of its own and if I have the time, I may write it tonight. Best,--Berig 16:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good start, but a bit difficult for non-runologists
Talk:Hexamethonium

message: This article refers to neuronal acetylcholine receptors, but the acetylcholine receptor article does not mention the existence of this type of receptor.  Normally nAch refers to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, so is that what this article should be referring to instead?  --Ed (Edgar181) 15:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually referring to neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (as opposed to muscle nAChR s), see  or the Subunit section of the WP article. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Hexamethonium is a Nicotinic blocker primarily, that happens to work in the ganglion rather than on effector organs; hence "nicotinic" needs to appear in the opening sentence. In other words, that it is neuronal is secondary to the fact that it antagonizes nicotinic neurotransmission.Dryphi (talk) 16:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1st Engineer Regiment (Jamaica)

message: ES EL CAPO DOMINICANO MAS GRADE CONOCIDO  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.166.203.73 (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIGUEROA AGOSTO
Talk:Conjunctive query

message: could it be that their index has to run from k+1 instead of 1??? otherwise there is an overlap with the distinguished ones which somehow doesn't appear to make sense. -- Kku (talk) 12:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  undistinguished variables 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Samulili

message: Very few edits, especially to Wikipedia space (19), not good. Yet this looks like a very positive response from the community. Look at the two RfAs above this one. They all have more Wikipedia-space experience than Samulili, and yet look set to get automatic rejection. I don't see this as fair. How can we let such an inexperienced Wikipedian, who has yet to gain full trust of the community via his edits (which, looking at what is there, aren't bad at all, believe me) obtain adminship? It's madness - in my three or four months of consistent participation on RfA, I've never seen anything like this happen before. The more experienced a user is, the more he'll know when answering the questions, and the more he'll be able to assist as an admin. Lradrama 10:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would advise it is because he has already proved his ability to administrate in (several) other regions of the MediaWiki projects, Commons being his central area of expertise. Considering he only wants to work with images as an admin, and he is an admin on Commons... -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry! Sorry everybody I've been a fool, because I've misread something, which should be obvious to you all. Ignore this rant please! Sorry everybody! Lradrama 10:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfair treatment
Talk:UTC−07:00

message: Chunks of British Columbia have voted to remain in UTC-7. The largest chunk is the Peace River Vally, which comprises Fort St. John, and several neighbouring districts. There are also one or two smaller areas in the south. samwaltz 16:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada/BC

message: I have made a number of changes to this article which is adding Calgary as a principal city as well as Edmonton because Calgary is the largest city in Alberta and Edmonton is the state capital, that is why I have put Calgary as a principal city as well as Edmonton.
I have also sorted out the Northwest Territories time zone and according to the timeanddate app that tells time everywhere all of the Northwest Territories is in one time zone so that is the reason why I have said all of the Northwest Territories is in one time zone for that reason.
I have also unified all of the countries using this time zone and principal cities to the same as List of UTC time offsets article in order to improve the article. Lachlb (talk) 01:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  My changes I've made to this article 

message: The reason why I think Calgary should be a principal city as well as Edmonton because Calgary is the largest city in Alberta and Edmonton is the capital of the province. Lachlb (talk) 01:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I think [[Calgary]] should be a principal city as well as [[Edmonton]] 

message: All of the Northwest Territories is in one time zone according to the timeanddate app who tells you the time everywhere. Lachlb (talk) 07:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Northwest Territories]] time zone
Talk:Bass Odyssey

message: I'm assuming this page has mostly been updated from representatives of the sound system, but the world knows Bass Odyssey as a "country" sound from Alexandria, St Ann, not Kingston. If there is a source Keith began the sound in Kingston, it should be listed. --Chimino (talk) 05:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingston?