Talk:Where Were You (When the World Stopped Turning)

message: I love this song (honestly) but the tone of this article is way to advocate.  It needs to be neautralized to sound less praising.--Esprit15d 18:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the one who wrote most of the article, it was hard to find much negative press on the song. It's probably out there. But my focus was to get the story about the writing of the song and its immediate aftereffects. Certainly, with more than half a decade passed since it was written and recorded, there has been been some backlash (the South Park parody is a good example). I'm hardly a rah-rah when it comes to stuff like this; I won't even go near some of the other 9/11 aftermath songs because I can't possibly be neutral about them. If you can find some good, sourced negativity/backlash, feel free to add it in. Cheemo 06:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: It seems rather ridiculous to list "the world stopped turning" as a factual inaccuracy. I don't think any rational person would miss that that line is symbolic. After all, if every wikipedia article on a song or poem or whatever listed its symbolic language as "factual inaccuracies," there would be chaos. Can you imagine? ("Factual inaccuracies: Juliet could not, in reality, be the sun, as she would die of the intense heat and blot out the earth, etc." As funny as it would be to see that, I don't imagine it would be received with any degree of seriousness.)
That being said, I didn't want to just take out the whole paragraph, since somebody obviously put the time into writing a whole paragraph, with an excellent description of what would have happened if the world had literally stopped turning (very thoughtful and rather interesting, I daresay), so I just thought I'd mention it here and see what the prevalent opinion on that paragraph is. 131.162.146.86 04:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's one of the more ridiculous things I've ever seen on Wikipedia, and I'm tempted to assume it's a joke.  If there's no objections, I'm scrapping the section. Vonspringer 07:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual inaccuracies 

message: :Image:WorldStoppedTurning.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationale is now included. Cheemo (talk) 08:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WorldStoppedTurning.JPG

message: Does anybody know if proceeds from the sales of this song went to charity, or if the performer vulturously kept the money?
--96.48.80.74 (talk) 09:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proceeds from sales