lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nieuport 27

message: Did Russia had a chance to get hold of any of this model before the 1917 revolution? Without a specific reliable source this might be confusion with the very similar 24? -Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they got a (very) small number in 1917, alongside some SPAD VIIs, but the Russians also either misidentified at least some of their 27s as 24s (per photos in Russian Aviation Colours) or applied the changes that differentiated the 27s to their 24s, just to make life confusing. Imperial Russian Air Service — Famous Pilots and Aircraft of World War I makes a mention of one Russian pilot having flown the 27.  - NiD.29 (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia?
Talk:Morane-Saulnier L

message: For some reason I can not edit the article. The "climb to 1000 m (300 ft)" should probably be "climb to 1000 ft (300 m)" or "climb to 1000 m (3300 ft)".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.27.101.81 (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Peter

message: What is the reference for the peter=petros ? with no reference it might as well come from sanskrit - pitar and greek - pater etc. ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.62.28.62 (talk) 10:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variations 

message: Can someone please confirm the vietnamese usage of Peter as an adjective? I moved it here from the Peter (name) page.
Thanks. Peter 16:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjective 

message: Does this article really need to list every person with the first name "Peter"? Rocksong 01:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. --Kvaks 18:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No. I will remove asap. -Indolences 11:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Peter Tork would do the trick, but current consensus here is not to list or link all people with given name Peter. Please consider also the links that I posted on your talk page.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Because of me and others undoing it for above reason: This list is not intended as list of all people with given name Peter.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: As the article states, those that are known primarily by the name Peter, typically saints, popes or emperors. The others are just too many.--Tikiwont (talk) 17:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I believe the thinking is: if they have a surname, don't list it here, because (a) the user will type in the surname, and (b) there are squillions of Peters. If they don't have a surname, do list it here, because (a) it may not always be obvious where to look (though as you point out, often it is), and (b) there aren't many of them anyway. Peter Ballard (talk) 06:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Actually, besides what Peter (!) said, the page has in in the see also section a link to the special page listing all pages starting with 'Peter'. While there are no comments, there are so many that inlcuding them would create a cumbersome page as besides having an article or not there is really no agreed criterion what would be the 'important' ones. You can aid linking also by redirects such as Peter (Family Guy) and searching for 'peter family guy' will bring you the right article up first. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Done. I've also added the special link in "See also", listing all articles with the prefix Peter -- please don't add more entries referring to people who are not known simply by the name Peter. Fattonyni (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name Peter 
Talk:La Hire

message: About La Hire, the main article (in English) specifies that "La Hire" is still used to denote a character prone to anger.
I would like to see backing info on that: as a native French speaker I know the word "ire" which means anger (same root as in "irate" in English) but never heard about "La hire" used as described. Please substantiate this claim.
Best regards
201.199.84.50 18:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the source for the 1390 birth category? I don't see any justification in the text; LC authority file does not give dates for him. any help?--FeanorStar7 12:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate

message: Hey hi, 
I added the military infobox with most parameters and a complete new source where a citation was required; however, I couldn't add a picture of the signature of La Hire because I needed to upload it first to Wikimedia (I think) and then link it in the article, for all of which I needed an account which I don't have; could someone upload the signature picture please? The picture can be found at http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_RMP5gGGaNA0/R88Ua5DqctI/AAAAAAAAAyg/BkdztoZ-rMg/s320/signlahire.jpg 
Thanks in advance and have a nice day, 
Carlos. 177.227.43.209 (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help adding La Hire's signature
Talk:Bertrand du Guesclin

message: I found this name to be a bit spurious, as it bears no resemblance to 'Bertrand du Guesclin' whatsoever.  I typed the name into google, and it came up with an IGN webpage http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/069/069378p1.html describing him as the fictional narrator in Age of Empires II.  Indeed, I've found no references to 'Guy' outside the contect of AOE.  I've removed it accordingly, but please do put it back if there's any evidence to suggest Bertrand du Guesclin was known by this name.
Mon Vier 13:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem unlikely yes. Garion96 (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guy Josselyne

message: I don't think the phrase quite likeable is particularly communitative. Perhaps someone who has read the books could add something more apt.
Dickie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.232.241.108 (talk • contribs). 18:45, 28 January 2007 
: I haven't read the books, but I removed the likeable part. Garion96 (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quite likeable

message: "Du Guesclin was captured and ransomed by Charles V for 100,000 francs."
I assume it's an estimation in modern term, because there were no currency named Franc at this time, right ?  :-)
82.241.221.24 14:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the page on 'franc', they were first minted in 1360, so it is within du Guesclin's time.  I've added a citation tag though. Mon Vier 15:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Disputed, see: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/bjwn7o/a_famous_medieval_knight_called_bertrand_du/emdw9fl/ --77.6.223.137 (talk) 07:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  100,000 francs ? 

message: The history of the crusades: for the recovery and possession of the Holy Land By Charles Mills
Published by Lea & Blanchard, 1844 Original from the New York Public Library Digitized Aug 23, 2007
page 184 -Born at chateau De la Motte de Broen and variant spelling of name: Du Gueselin.The Autumn of the Middle Ages by Johan Huizinga Translated by Rodney Payton
The University of Chicago Press 1996  Based on the 1921 edition page 77 Du Gueselin was so highly regarded by his contemporaries that Deschamps added him as the 10th Worthy to the cult of the Nine Worthies les neuf preux.Nitpyck (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also Du Gueselin
Talk:Dassault Mirage IIIV

message: I'm not sure this quite qualifies as B class, I'd say very high Start, right on the borderline. - Aerobird 04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, there was a problem with the banner coding, checklist is indicating more cites needed. Assessed as C class. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questioning the rating 

message: i believe this aircraft (or another french vtol) needed a water-cooled platform for vtol. When the p1127 made its debut at the paris air show (flying backwards, flanked by helicopters), it made a point of landing on the grass next to the dassault.
jim  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.64.122.105 (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  french vtol aircraft 

message: Mirage IIIV? IIIV is not a well-formed Roman Numeral. Is it supposed to be 2? Or 35 maybe? Just what are you supposed to call it? Eye eye eye vee?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.43.44.229 (talk) 03:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 3-Vee. - BilCat (talk) 04:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Dassault  call it the III V, with a space. Presumably the idea is that it's a VTOL version of the Mirage III. I think this article might be improperly named.  Card Zero  (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

text: Agree the common name in English is Mirage IIIV interestingly it says "Dassault Sud Mirage IIIV" on the tail. MilborneOne (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Tystion

message: I don't think "Welsh-language band" is superfluous.  There is a difference between bands from Wales who sing in English, and bands that choose to sing in Welsh as part of their political statement.  As someone who works on radio programs, it is useful for me and researchers like me to find bands that sing in Welsh.  Feel free to comment.  --Kit 02:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dassault Mirage IV

message: So the recce variant of the Mirage 2000 will not be ready until 2007? I'm reading the article in 2012, so this information is rather pointless don't you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.41.156.1 (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article totally outdated 

message: I think the article makes the typical wikipedia error of mixing up range and radius. The"radius" figures offered are simply unreasonable and in conflict with other websites. example http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/bomber/mirage4/
"a combat radius of 1,700 miles at Mach 0.9" bullocks, that's range, not radius. range = up to 2 * radius (sometimes "range" is a raw figure, radius takes reserves into account)
""high-high-high" at a speed of Mach 1.85, engaging targets up to a maximum radius of 3,500 km (2,175 mi)" Again bullocks. Mach 1.85 was not the cruise speed, but rather the top speed with bomb and the 3,500 km may have been the range, but not the radius.
Major repair required. Will put it on watch list and change it later if nobody intervenes. 23:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The specifications are cited to a reliable source. What makes your source better than a published article by a well known author on modern military aviation published in a well established magazine?Nigel Ish (talk) 08:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  range / radius 
Talk:Frank País

message: What this addition just c&ped on?
--Jersey Devil 02:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I was getting the info from a difficult source. I just wanted to get it in there and then clean it up. But I got way too tired last night. Didn't know anyone else was paying attention, but don't worry. I can fixed up quickly once I can get my eyes to focus agin. KarenAnn 10:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?
Talk:USS Saipan (CVL-48)

message: I am considering splitting this article in two and starting a new article at USS Arlington (AGMR-2) which would give the history of the ship and it's stats, etc, starting after it's conversion in 1965.  I'm wondering what other people think about splitting this article. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 17:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  potential article split 

message: Possible severe inaccuracy: Wiki article says ship was sold for scrap in 1976; youtube documentary shows Ship in active operation WAY PAST 1976
The Youtube documentary of interest is titled 'Harrier Jump Jet'.  The associated URL is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzFr_w1aKqw   .
At Time Index 8:37 -through- Time Index 12:01 ,  the USS Saipan appears to be performing active Battle Maneuvers (circa 1995).  In the Youtube documentary, the USS Saipan is shown launching Harrier Jump Jets -and- Amphibious Assault vehicles.  
Your Wikipedia article states that the USS Saipan was SOLD FOR SCRAP in the year 1976.  Obviously, the Ship was operating WAY PAST the year 1976.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.226.85.252 (talk) 19:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong ship. USS Saipan (LHA-2) is the one in the video. - BilCat (talk) 19:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistaken identity
Talk:Edible underwear

message: Doesn't seem to fit Wikipedia's style guidelines... 94.192.47.210 (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Essential is the material. Is it sweetened? Water soluble? Digestibility? Nutrients? --Helium4 (talk) 11:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material?
Talk:USS Wright (CVL-49)

message: The heading should add (CC-2):
USS Wright (CVL-49) (CC-2) 50.110.150.111 (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean the page title, it can only have one hull code (if that), while any others are noted in the lead, as in the case here, including CC-2. - wolf 07:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading
Talk:Juntas de Abastecimientos y Precios

message: Your POV edits:
:The JAP were essentially rationing boards, supposedly designed to alleviate the chronic shortages of basic foodstuffs and supplies that were affecting the country, self-created shortages which were caused by the Allende policy of freezing prices and raising wages.
:These Allende-controlled, politically-motivated local groups determined who received foodsupplies and, just as importantly, who did not. They were a cornerstone project in the long term goal of building a command-and-control, Soviet-style economy in Chile.
Tell me how the above statements are fact and not your own opinion. Tell me, can you prove each and every one of your comments with documents? Please notice Wikipedia has a neutrality policy. I don't think you can get away with the above. ☆ CieloEstrellado 02:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV edits

message: The short article is not a good starting point to elaborate on this interesting social organ of poder popular (popular power). It was introduced incorrectly. Since a JAP per se constitutes an entity; a social organ or unit, it should have been entered into Wikipedia in singular form: Junta de Abastecimientos y Precios, not in plural. (eg. as in Parliament, or Soviet (council)). In the first sentenced they should have been briefly defined eg. A JAP is an organ of poder popular or workers democracy…etc. Then there should have been an explanation of the nature or root source of this power or democracy eg. workers as opposed to bourgeois or workers as opposed to employers; revolutionary as opposed to institutional. Then the historical etc....Moshe-paz 16:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title
Talk:Da'i (Islam)

message: The right title for this article is Da'i. Caller to Islam makes no sense. Alternatively, we can merge this article into Dawah. --Bluerain talk 06:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Caller to Islam" is a contextual translation.  It may not be the best as article title, but it's not true that it "makes no sense"[sic]... AnonMoos 12:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move - Da'i 

message: Since a da'i is just a person who does dawah, and since there isn't much information over here, I think its best we merge this article into Dawah. Any comments on this? --Bluerain talk 04:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge - Dawah
Talk:Peruvian Naval School

message: Maybe we should use the term midshipman instead of cadet, the Peruvian Navy uses U.S. Navy terms, doctrines and even same uniforms after early-1900's USN Mission that was incharged of the Peruvian Navy reform. -- EvogolTalk 02:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Special Duty Combat Unit Shinesman

message: I have the entire Shinesman manga series and enough Japanese knowledge to translate key plot points.  Thoughts on how to go about updating the page to include the manga information?  Gramarye1971 02.06, 28 September 2006
That's something to consider.Hope the manga gets licensed soon.But to answer your question,that's what the Edit function is for. - R.G. 13:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating
Talk:Glacial polish

message: Needs example images - Leonard G. 03:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

message: In the caption to the second image, what does it mean to say that the polish is millimetres thick? Unless there has been some chemical alteration of the rock and the process does not imply that, then it effectively has no thickness, it is simply the smooth nature of the surface itself.  cheers Geopersona (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millimetres thick?
Talk:Washington State Route 397

message: Any objections to the move? Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 03:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 11:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Expanded, B-Class. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 01:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: The following coordinates may be useful in creating or updating a KML file.
*  I-82
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  Piert Road
*  Piert Road (old terminus?)
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  Cable Bridge (Kennewick)
*  Cable Bridge (Pasco)
* 
* 
* 
*  I-182
– Allen4names (IPv6 contributions) 06:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: – Allen4names (IPv6 contributions) 08:29, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add or update KML 

message: The route description needs to be properly updated. What I have written below is not a suitable replacement but it is a start. The maps are available at the USGS store Map Locator & Downloader. No direct links AFAIK. – Allen4names (IPv6 contributions) 06:37, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route description 
Talk:In His Steps

message: That one of the best-selling books in the history of our world is merely an unmarked stubbed with a single edit (by the creator!) and no discussion page is an outright travesty.  We need a expert here pronto. 12.208.40.109 03:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

message: What's the content of the book, we ask ourselves, as it is quite impossible to get this from the article, as of now. Is it poetry? Is it nonfiction, e.g. a collection of sermons? Or is there a real plot? Which? --Ayacop (talk) 16:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what's the plot? 
Talk:Transformational Christianity

message: I'm a little unclear why Jesus Camp is linked to this article.  From what I can tell, the focus is on old-line Pentecostal/Evangelical/Fundamentalist issues, and doesn't provide any useful context about "Transformationalism" per se.  Could JohnMarkH perhaps explain why we should keep it here?Drernie 17:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus Camp? 

message: I am glad to see someone providing critiques of Transformationalism in the article, but they don't seem very NPOV (at least to me).  Is there someone "neutral" who can help clean them up?  Is it worth having a separate "criticism" section, or is it best to have the contrary opinion expressed alongside the positive one? Drernie (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding the criticism is making the article neutral: reporting what others think who disagree is not of itself lacking in neutrality... Hyper3 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the main problem is that the criticisms were added directly to the article, rather than being references to existing external criticism.  I reluctantly removed them (except for the introductory comments) while updating the article to match Wikipedia's citation guidelines. If anyone still cares, hopefully they can find appropriate sources. Drernie (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 
Talk:Sinner (Drowning Pool album)

message: took a bit, some fuck ups, but the cover is back. just dont let it happen again, uploader-of-stupid-book-cover-in-place-of-album-cover guy♠♦Д narchistPig♥♣ (talk) 17:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  image 

message: Somehow on this page infos about a "japanese bonus disc" continues to surface despite these will be deleted. The same tracklist is present, some demos from the album and some unreleased outtakes, but without any reference, info or proofs. Nowhere these outtakes have never surfaced so it really seems to be fake. NO REAL PROOFS = NOT REAL. Give evidences of get a life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.59.14 (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Bonus Disc: rarity or hoax? 
Talk:Lothair II of Italy

message: This was discussed on a user talk page before. I paste it below:
:The change was primarily from "II of Arles" to "II of Italy", but the secondary Lothar to Lothair change was important, too. The 1911 Britannica, the Columbia, Encarta, and the World Almanac (all designed for popular readership) use Lothair. Wikipedia also uses Lothair in all its articles (see Lothair). The old Cambridge Medieval History uses Lothar, as do most modern works it seems. Lothar is the German version of the name, Lothaire is the French, and Lotario is the Italian. I think the modern preference for Lothar is similar to the modern preference for Pippin over Pepin: it indicates the influence of German scholarship in these areas. I have even seen Lothaire in some works. Lothair, not being the correct form in any other language, is surely the proper English form, to be preferred in an encyclopaedic article. In scholarly works, the authors decide whether to use English or non-English forms for reasons known to them. I think the use of Clotaire over Chlothar or any other variant is a poor choice, but at least Wikipedia is consistent in it. I hope this justifies the change to you. 
I will defend the move in more depth here, though I take exception to a reversion solely because a defence was not preemptively offered on the discussion page. Firstly, Lothair is the proper English spelling and Wikipedia elsewhere recognises this. Use of Lothar for this specific, entirely non-German individual is incomprehensible. Secondly, in what sense he is "of Arles"? While he is called that because his father was there count, it is solely a byname and has no connection to his ordinal. He was the king of Italy and the second Lothair to be such, therefore he is "Lothair II of Italy". There are several other references for this usage and a simple Google search reveals a few of these that occur online. Srnec 03:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Esplanade

message: There's a nice one in Macau too. 205.174.22.28 03:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Macau

message: Promenade redirects here. Yet the article itself says "Esplanade and promenade are sometimes used interchangeably, but that is a mistake." So let's redirect one term to the other, implying they're equivalent, and yet explicitly state that they are not. Whoo! --Buddy13 (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why redirect? 

message: At the moment it links to Esplandade. But it should link to Promenade. In the german article to :de:Esplanade it explicit says so: "Esplanade nennt man dann auch allgemein Plätze und Promenaden vor einem größeren, öffentlichen Gebäude, später gelegentlich auch in Gärten – während auch im Französischen der Aspekt des Platzes überwiegt, bezeichnet der Begriff im Englischen das, was das heute deutsche Promenade – zu frz. promener ‚spazieren‘ – bezeichnet (falscher Freund / false friend)"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.206.173.231 (talk) 23:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  interlanguage link to german should be changed 

message: In Swedish the word esplanad has one specific meaning: a wide street with a tree-planted median, sometimes referring to the median itself. "A long, open, level area, usually next to a river or large body of water, where people may walk" is called a strandpromenad ("beach promenade") and can never be called an esplanad. Since Sweden and Finland has a common history the Finnish word puistokatu ("park street") refers to the same street type as the Swedish esplanad. /80.78.215.180 (talk) 16:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The interwiki links to sv and fi should be removed 

message: The area of land at the entrance to Edinburgh Castle is also known as the The Esplanade, but obviously is nowhere near a body of water. 150.143.238.64 (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edinburgh Castle