lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of names of Vishnu

message: 416 and 964 Pranavah. But is lacking Pranadha.--Manfariel (talk) 10:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition 

message: This is a very useful list for Vaishnavites. The link provided under References is also the source for this list. It contains the 1000 names of Lord Vishnu which is a very useful piece of information for Vaishnavites and would be a very appropriate article under the Vaishnavism category.
I will mention the source at the top of the article. Please indicate if the article needs any other changes in order to survive.
Hari (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No the article will survive.  I'm glad to see you only selected 80 of the 1000 names, that is a good move.  You might find some commentary on the major names (if there is a differentiation).  Also, it wouldn't hurt to add things like who first uttered (created) a name or any interesting historal oddities about names (if Vishnu is a male deity, a name that is in a neuter gender might be interesting).  Thanks. Mbisanz (talk) 03:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from [[User:Nharipra|Hari]] 

message: Names as per the Vishnu Sahasranama 27.63.181.6 (talk) 07:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names as per the Vishnu Sahasranama 

message: I have merged this article, which only had the (schwa-deleted) names of Vishnu from the Vishnu Sahasranama, with the main article, which has a table with an accurate rendering of the names of the deity.  Chronikhiles (talk) 08:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with Vishnu Sahasranama
Talk:Hippobroma longiflora

message: A resident was telling us that this is a herb but it did not seem right since the colour markings such as the white flower stock seem disturbing. A quick research shows that this is a rather toxic plant.. consumption of any kind is highly ill advised. 138.75.255.144 (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicity
Talk:Manyu sukta

message: The book "Hymns of the Rigveda" was published by Ralph Griffith in 1896. I suppose the issue of copyrights does not apply here since the publication is more than 100 years old. Further, the same content is available in wikisource as well - 
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Rig_Veda/Mandala_10/Hymn_83
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Rig_Veda/Mandala_10/Hymn_84
Hence my understanding is that there is no copyright violation issue here. Please clarify.
Hari (talk) 03:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My concern with copyright was that this translation had been published in a book that was somehow still copyrighted.  But since its on Wikisource that isn't an issue.  If you go to this link WP:NOT#MIRROR you'll see that we prefer not to have exact duplicates of existing source material.  Since this text is already available on Wikisource, as you linked to (thanks), the bext thing to do would be to redirect this page to  Rig veda or Manyu and put a boxed link on those pages, linking to the Wikisource copy.  One major problem I could see leaving this text around is that editors might attempt to reword its grammar, spelling, syntax, to conform with modern english grammar, which would destroy the meaning.  Leaving it linked to Wikisource protects it from those sorts of errors.  Thanks again. Mbisanz (talk) 04:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Cliff (training ground)

message: I've uploaded some scans with details of the buildings and layout of the Cliff from 1974 in case anyone wants to use them. They are from a United yearbook and it has no isbn, so I'm not sure how to use it as a ref in this article. Anyway, they are here:  Decorativeedison (talk) 09:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some scans of a 1974 article on The Cliff
Talk:Sir Matt Busby Player of the Year

message: Is there such a thing? Does this actually refer to IMUSA?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomlock01 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed there was such a thing until 1987. That year, the club took charge of the supporters' club, at which time it ceased to be the "independent Manchester United Supporters' Club" and simply became the "Manchester United Supporters' Club", later known as "One United". – PeeJay 23:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Righteo. Tomlock01 (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: independent Manchester United Supporters Club

message: I won't restore my edits again, to avoid violating WP:3RR - but I would like to outline the reasons why I made the changes I did and why I think my version is superior to the current version, as reverted to by PeeJay2K3.
Having 6 columns is totally unnecessary. The season, name and position are obviously necessary, but I can figure out no reason for the references column - the most obviously valid place for the references is in the name column, not a separate column.
The nationality column is also superfluous - every single good list of footballers on Wikipedia lists them with flags before the names, not written out nationalities. It has been suggested that this is preferable for sorting by nationality, but I fail to see why that would be necessary - there is a separate table below outlining wins by nationality, plus the table is small enough to work out who is from where anyway.
The notes column is also ridiculous. It is obvious from the first appearance of the English flag (whether that be before the name or in a separate column), who is the first English recipient - and from the number of times they appear in the table, it is obvious how many times each recipient has won the award (it's outlined in the opening paragraph too, anyway). Furthermore, outlining facts such as the first non-European recipient is totally unnecessary - anyone concerned enough to want to know this fact (which is totally irrelevant to the subject at hand) can not only find it out easily through researching the nationalities presented, they likely already knows their geography well enough to work it out. If you can't work out who the first English recipient is, I doubt your the sort of person who cares.
Anyway, I won't restore my version again - I just wanted to outline my reasons, for your consideration, with the hope that some of my points may be noted. - HIGHFIELDS (TALK   •  UPLOADS) 01:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I can live with the Notes column being removed, but if you delete the Nationality column, I believe the table loses a useful function. Just because other tables indicate nationality with a flag next to the player's name doesn't mean this one has to. The references column is also much of a muchness, but I would like to hear other people's opinions on the matter. – PeeJay 12:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table
Talk:Water supply and sanitation in Saudi Arabia

message: The nature of the floating desalinization plants is not mentioned. What is their power source? What method of desalinization do they use?Bill (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Floating desalinization plants
Talk:1948 FA Cup final

message: Not sure that his being "the first fullback to score at Wembley" is all that notable. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 22:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie Shimwell 
Talk:Outpost for Hope

message: I did the edits one by one, with an edit summary that explains them. The best way to look at them is to go through the history and look at my edits one by one (That's called the "diff" view). Also, wrote minor comments into the document as hidden comments. In each diff view, they appear . — Sebastian 04:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this is fantastic feedback! Thank you. This helps me tons not only on this entry but every other entry I will ever get to work on :D --Inelia (talk) 07:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Before reposting it, you should solicit feedback from some other editors by leaving messages on their talk pages. — 00:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The most important single problem for this article is notability. Please read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). It says "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability." A whole article counts as substantial. So far, there's only one link to an independent source - the one to Readers Digest. — Sebastian 04:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added multiple independent sources. Are there any areas that need more information? --Inelia (talk) 08:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it's good enough for now. However, some of the links are not from reliable sources - more about that below. — Sebastian 21:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I don't know why you keep removing the definition of the organization from the lead section. Please see Wikipedia:Lead section. You may also look at a few featured articles as examples. — Sebastian 21:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section 

message: Hello,  ... Sebastian asked me to take a look at this sandbox, so I did my WikiGnome thing and added some  templates to make the references look more encyclopedic, as well as a few cosmetics per WP:MOS ... please take a look at WP:CITE, and use the templates for any new references you add ... Happy Editing! — 02:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry ... I had to remove this reference: because it was in the class of  Links normally to be avoided ... if I find any others, I'll just comment in the edit summary. —72.75.72.199 (talk) 02:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Final comments: (a) references should always follow punctuation, (b) whenever possible, use the <title> field on the referenced Web page to supply the |title= field in the tag, and (c) some of your sources do not meet the criteria for WP:RS because they are blogs. —72.75.72.199 (talk) 03:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanups
Talk:John Parris

message: Stephen Maguire doesn't use a Parris cue anymore.
I notice that the link to the Parris website that supported this is no longer live.
I believe he has a Trevor White cue now but have no ref.
The Parris website is not a reliable way to see who is using the cues anyway. Sometimes player who use other cues that have had repares made etc. appear on the site as customers. 
Sorry if I haven't done this right, it's my first time on here.
I hope I can help to expand the cue maker section but the references might be difficult. 
Watford147 (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Maguire 
Talk:Phemonoe

message: The original article here was stolen entirely from "http://www.ancientlibrary.com/wcd/Phemonoe" Wiki Classical Dictionary, format and sources included with no real effort made to make it a good wiki article.  That article stole the information from "http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/2589.html" The Ancient Library.  That article is just a photocopy of "Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology" page 256. -----Adimovk5 (talk) 04:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An incredible circle of theft
Talk:British Association for Shooting and Conservation

message: I think that the notability template should be removed.  This is a major British organisation, perhaps somewhat equivalent to the US National Wildlife Federation in that both are pro-hunting conservation groups.  Any English-speaking organisation with 130,000 members belongs in the English Wikipedia in my opinion.  Certainly the article needs to be improved -- by qualifed editors -- but the idea that it should be merged or deleted is ridiculous!  69.96.255.199 (talk) 14:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it's given evidence in select committees in Parliament. http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=6805 I shall remove the notice. 109.154.126.255 (talk) 22:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability question is silly 

message: I've added some tags, would like some discussion before editing proper. 
The paragraph "Over the years BASC has demonstrated.." clearly reads like an endorsement of the BASC and possibly a bit of a passive aggressive dig at some other organisations. The "WAGBI nearly died due to the losses sustained" paragraph is also pretty partisan, especially in it's description of the Protection of Birds Bill (great pun by the way).
I've tagged this two but I believe the rest of the article can be of similar tone sometimes, but a neutrality banner is not the sort of thing you just put on the top of a page unilaterally and might not even be a bit much.
I'm sure these are good faith edits by people enthusiastic about this page , but it's just that on wikipedia there are an abundance of viewpoints and we need to be careful to be neutral.
(Protectthehuman (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Sections of this article appear to have been copied from the association's website, this page in particular:. Any such text should be deleted and rewritten, preferably from 3rd-party sources. The website itself can be used as a source for routine facts, but the article should be based on independent, secondary sources. I'm too lazy right now to do all the work myself, and I'm too nice to just delete it outright. Rewriting from reliable sources would probably help address the neutrality issues raised in the previous thread. Rezin (talk) 01:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  close paraphrasing 

message: this might be a helpful source:
Martin, John - 'British Association for Shooting and Conservation' in:</br> 
 (with a link to another source (1970))
--Dick Bos (talk) 12:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible helpful source
Talk:Political philosophy of Immanuel Kant

message: It seems this article would be better suited instead within the main page for [Immanuel Kant].  A large section of it is already contained within the article, and it doesn't seem to have much benefit from being separated. --67.142.130.48 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Immanuel Kant?
Template talk:Football manager list entry

message: This template is designed to be used with the Template:Football manager history. Any problems see the WP:FOOTY talkpage. For information on how to use this template, see Template:Football manager history/doc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woody (talk • contribs) 09:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I think it should be  rather than  . Bullets are for small text.
Cheers --TheAllSeeingEye (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 07:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  middot not bullet 

message: Please apply hCard and hCalendar microformats by changing:
:* {{{name}}} ({{{from}}}{{#if:{{{to|}}}|–{{{to}}}}})
to:
:* <span class="vevent"><span class="agent attendee vcard"><span class="fn org summary">{{{name}}}</span></span> (<span class="dtstart">{{{from}}}</span>{{#if:{{{to|}}}|–{{{to}}}}})</span>
This will, among other things, make it possible to generate visual timelines. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also added dtend class. -- WOSlinker (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but we shouldn't use dtend, as, by convention, this template takes two-digit values for the "to" date (which is not ideal, but a separate issue). Please remove it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- WOSlinker (talk) 07:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microformats 

message: Please replace space with  
:......</span></span> (......
:......</span> (......
or  --Vencin (talk) 18:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Space
Talk:Brandon Jennings

message: I honestly can't believe this page was considered for deletion at one point.  At any rate, the main point here is that since he's not going to Arizona yet and there's a good chance of him going to Europe to play pro ball for a year, shouldn't the Arizona tag not be there?  --Reezy (talk) 06:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 183 or 122 cm?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.220.64 (talk) 15:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  how tall is he 

message: He gave 50K$ for people involved in the earthquake... I believe this must be added...93.34.57.100 (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Earthquake in Abbuzzi

message: Who made the bucks in 6 section so short? It used to be a lot longer- it should be longer than it is as it’s a huge piece of Bucks lore. Eg224 (talk) 23:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bucks in 6 section
Template talk:Football manager last

message: This template is designed to be used with the Template:Football manager history. Any problems see the WP:FOOTY talkpage. For information on how to use this template, see Template:Football manager history/doc  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woody (talk • contribs) 09:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I have added an optional "to" parameter so the infobox can be used for defunct clubs as well as active ones. Qwghlm (talk) 22:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "To" added
Talk:National Cadet Special Activities

message: This page needs a lot more expansion. Gone are the (good ol') days of six or seven national activities! Wow! Anyway, please help out using the noted reference and any other references you can find to expand this page out! Semper Vi! VigilancePrime (talk) 04:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand Me Please!!! 

message: Found this article about Aircraft Maintenance and Manufacturing Academy. Will add when (if) I get time.  (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 
Talk:Scorpius–Centaurus association

message: Canopus is in this group? Fig (talk) 10:52, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Im also looking for this 240F:79:57A:1:B540:F0E9:2CD7:C96D (talk) 04:17, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members
Talk:Pit Fighter (film)

message: Since the AfD resulted in "no consensus", I will reset the date counter of the notability tag for now. The old date was March 2007. --B. Wolterding (talk) 10:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: You can't say this isn't notable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.118.182.92 (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Come on. 

message: The movie is not an adaption or based on the 1990 video game. A common mistake.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.243.215.48 (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not related to the game.
Talk:Tecuexe

message: There is some great information here that should be included into this page:
https://books.google.com/books?id=IfutDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT88&lpg=PT88&dq=list+tecuexe&source=bl&ots=jdKel9sLXm&sig=ACfU3U151JEzeSjzaKBKAXIVmI6_aPu_lA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwju2tTJ7qz5AhUZATQIHT6qAHgQ6AF6BAgeEAM#v=onepage&q=list%20tecuexe&f=false Miquiztli398 (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  An important reference...
Talk:Chachaura-Binaganj

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Chakghat

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Eoörnis pterovelox gobiensis

message: The move discussion inspires the following amplification. The authors of this piece were scrupulous in their adherence to scientific convention, if not to the scientific facts. Thus, they very intentionally used standard capitalization for the Latin trinomial and set the text in italics.
Readers who stray to this Talk page might appreciate what the authors themselves wrote. "The name by which the organism has long been known is that given it by Linnaeus: Micropteron asiatica. Since Linnaeus definitely states that he did not actually see a specimen, and since he further expressed doubt as to the credibility of reports concerning it, the author has ventured to select as a more appropriate name, that suggested in an obscure Persian journal by his esteemed colleagues Francois-Villon and Sugamora, Eoörnis pterovleox gobiensis." Citing The Teheran Oölogist 7:876-880. 1926.
 
Phytism (talk) 20:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on name
Talk:Chandia, Madhya Pradesh

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Chandla

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Chaurai Khas

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition