Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/A Kiwi

message: An IP check will reveal no chance that Keyne is me, and Zeraeph's ideas that Keyne and I may be working together are unfounded.  In fact, please provide any example of such.  (Here is my response to Keyne, who brought this whole situation to my attention today.)  I see that Kiwi has also posted to his talk page.  My involvement with the Asperger syndrome article came about because I am active at WP:FAR, and I have had no other interaction with Keyne, ever. 
 
From reading this entire series of pages, it appears likely that Kiwi may be the person who has been e-mailing me, from an AOL account, for several weeks, so I know what her motivations are, and respectfully suggest that she should not be bringing her disputes with Zeraeph from multiple other forums into Wikipedia.  We can take care of ourselves just fine. Kiwi, if you are the person who has been e-mailing me, the information is most intriguing, but unwanted.  Your involvement in this situation has only complicated it.
I have responded to none of those e-mails, as I have no interest in being involved in long-standing off-Wiki disputes between Zeraeph and others, but now it appears that I may need to forward those e-mails to any admin looking into this case, which extends far beyond Wikipedia and shed light onto this situation.  
Further, since I have an AOL account in addition to my Optonline account, and I use that account whenever I travel, if Kiwi is that AOL user, Kiwi has not helped clarify things in terms of IP checks.  
Based on the interaction I've had with Zeraeph on Wikipedia, and if the things that I am being told in these e-mails from an AOL user are true, this entire attack on Keyne is nothing more than an attempt to drag me back into a conflict with Zeraeph, whom I have avoided since the closing of the AS FARC, and since she has three times refused to mediate.  I had determined to ignore both Kiwi and Zeraeph, and whatever is the problem they are bringing from other internet sites, but unfortunately, since they are Zeraeph is dragging an innocent bystander (Keyne) into it, I have decided to put in my two cents.  I suggest that Keyne has no idea what is going on, as he is not privy to the invasive and obnoxious e-mails I have been receiving.
Should they be useful in resolving the situation (since the e-mails are from an AOL user), I will be happy to forward them to an admin, but I am a firm and adamant believer in absolutely never ever posting details of private e-mail to a public forum.
Sandy 16:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also like to formally request that the CheckUser proceed, to clear my name.  My IP history will reveal that I traveled in mid-May, and was on various hotel and other dialup connections.  I also traveled at the end of May/beginning of June.  Both times, I was at various different hotels and locations, sometimes with high-speed connections, sometimes on dialup.  My house was struck by lightening on July 10th (I have diffs of communications with other editors, and it was amply discussed on my talk page and in article talk pages where I had to defer edits because of a slow connection while my house was repaired), so my editing for about a week afterwards was from dialups and different computers, until I got a new connection and computers repaired. Sandy 18:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Catching up with all the discussions I haven't participated in, this discussion is apparently what motivated all of this. This is yet another attack thread on me, without a shred of evidence, or for that matter, logic or reason. Sandy 18:31, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: SG response

message: Please let me know if I'm multiple.  It'd be most interesting if I could be in three places at the same time (and think of the productivity gain!)
Otherwise, I'm going to have to ask for User:Zeraeph to stop this continued libel and harassment.  --Keyne 17:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not going to happen.  Wikipedia has allowed Zeraeph to attack me across multiple articles ever since the Asperger syndrome FARC (evidence the latest ongoing attack thread against me on Talk:Asperger syndrome, even though I have had no interaction with her, you, or the article since the FARC ended eons ago).  I can't even recall the last time I had anything to do with the AS article, but it's probably been a month now.  This a good example of why it is best to avoid some situations and some editors.  Even though I've done that, I'm now drug back into this, which may have been the goal all along.  The whole thing is disgusting.  And it's not going to stop with either mediation or a checkuser.  Sandy 17:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP doesn't have any clauses regarding on-going harassment?  That strikes me as poorly thought out, if true.  --Keyne 17:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter that she will eventually be proven wrong on the sock/meat puppetry.  I have been smeared now (without a piece of evidence ever), in 3 MedCab cases (but she refuses to mediate), two ANI reports, across multiple user talk pages, on several article talk pages, at WP:FAR, and now in CheckUser.  All in spite of me disengaging completely from any interaction with her or her articles.  If the goal is simply to sully my name, it has been successful.  And Wiki does nothing about it.  Sandy 17:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Keyne Response

message: Then, either the proxies are too intricate (an admitted possibilty), or it must be meatpuppetry. Bear in mind the issue is NOT sockpuppetry, it is complex long term abuse. Sockpuppetry was just one option on the mechanics of it that, if proven would resolve it once and for all, so checking seemede obvious. The complex, long term abuse and collusion is not even in doubt. --Zeraeph 02:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Back to Reality