lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anke Van dermeersch

message: Initially, she promised to pose nude for playboy magazine if she were to be elected, but it was not to be that year. She was elected in 2003 , so why didn't she pose? Intangible 17:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was wondering if we should add this external link:
*YouTube video results for Anke Vandermeersch
Please discuss below.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is she saying ? What's the middle finger about ? --83.182.233.86 18:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The video was hyped via email a couple of years back, which is why I think it is known enough to be encyclopedic. It shows a VB party congress where Anke speeches, saying "The next elections are about three topics; Flanders, safety, and immigrants (while showing here middle finger)." Note that a normal person counts the other way round, with the tumb being one, the index finger 2 and a the middle finger three. We'd probably have to put a language icon.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although interesting, it is a re-edit of her speech by some activists. So it cannot be added to Wikipedia. Intangible 15:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The article does not mention the fact that she used to be VLD, and gives a confusing account about this naked in Playboy business.  We should concentrate on correcting that. On the other hand, reading the Dutch version, was her protest against the cordon sanitaire really the (only) reason for the VLD to dump her? The worst problem with Anke is of course that "ladderzat in de goot" - we cannot write that either, although the source is Vlaams Blok Magazine, oktober 1998. --Pan Gerwazy 00:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

text: This is a rather irrelevant gaffe. Should Wikipedia include links to videos of Bushisms? I think not. Unless AV has a known record or such public mistakes it's totally irrelevant. --moyogo 19:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see your point but I don't think this is a mistake, I'm almost certain that this was very intentional to take things to yet another legal but keeping them barely acceptable at the same time.  I think the video link should not be included... but IF the video wasn't edited and IF the Wikipedia article would mention the event as well .. then one could argue about this....Evilbu 22:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text:  Indeed. You can only argue about this if you have a reliable source (i.e. not some kind of activist web-site or so), that says this gaffe was actually intentional. Intangible 23:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Talk:Génépi

message: A user made a substantial edit, adding much content to the page. Among this added information was several alternate uses of the word "génépi". Since there are no pages dealing with the alternate uses, and on quick glance they don't seem notable enough to merit their own pages, I have deleted them from the lead. But I'm placing them here in case someone wants to build upon them in the future:
"Genepi is the name of a lake, a mountain, a mountain pass, a glacier and a hotel in Savoy Alps."
The mountain is in the French Alps near Saint-Agnan-en-Vercors (see Peakery.com). -Krasnoludek (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Uses

message: Very enjoyable article to read, but due to lack of citations comes across as overly editorial. Section 'Genepi at Home' is interesting but contains no citations. 
Harry Sargent (talk) 20:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: Genepy Le Chamois and Genepy Herbetet are both at least partially redistilled. The recipe I've seen from the 1800s (from Pierre Duplais) is redistilled as well. At least one contemporary commercial product is not distilled, and I'd imagine there are plenty of home recipes that aren't, but the text currently in the article is clearly, at a minimum, too sweeping. 35.9.194.7 (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distilled Génépi
Talk:Winners Don't Use Drugs

message: :His name was often concatenated into "Williams Sessions" by many non-English-speaking, primarily Japanese, game companies.
Can we get a better citation for this than a newsgroup post? - furrykef (Talk at me) 08:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Williams Sessions" 

message: At the intro to "Ozar Midrashim" they mock "Winners Don't Use Drugs" by cite it in reverse.
--NikitaSadkov (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Society - Don't be Afraid Reference 

message: See topic. It's right at the start of the game Tyguy 86 (talk) 17:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pop culture sections are problems as they fall into WP:TRIVIA, unless a reliable third-party source has taken note of it. Masem (t) 17:24, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added High on Life (2022 video game)
Talk:Qumran

message: These two articles appear to have the exact same scope. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is a problem to have two clearly delineated articles here, potentially one on the geography feature itself (the series of caves) and any associated archaeology, and the other one on the national park as an administrative unit (and any contained archaeological features) - but this arrangement would require some slight rescoping and content reshuffling to ensure that the two subject are actually properly delineated: at the present the situation is far more re-duplicative. Also, if one article is about a national park, it should be titled officially, i.e. "Qumran National Park". Iskandar323 (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with all of Iskandar's points. A straight-up merge seems like too much to put on one page, but there could definitely be some better segregation of the contents.00:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Qumran]] and [[Qumran Caves]]
Talk:Swansea Metropolitan University

message: (I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 21:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University ratings

message: The name of this institution has changed recently, see .  Any objections to moving this article to "University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Swansea" SamHampton (talk) 18:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Swansea" 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swansea Metropolitan Student Union. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swansea Metropolitan Student Union listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Wychbury Hill

message: I have removed the reference to the body being found in 'Hagley Wood', because I am fairly sure that Hagley Wood (which is on the other side of A456) is the wrong one.  Peterkingiron 17:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The architect is J. Stuart. --80.187.111.135 (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temple of Theseus
Talk:Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University

message: Hi. My name is Juan Carlos. I studied in Azerbaijan State Oil Academy in 1982 until 1987 and I can find my students collegues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcmp640131 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juan Carlos 
Talk:Chris Cox Megamix

message: As far as I can tell, this song was NEVER released as a CD single in the UK.  There was at least one promotional CD issued (BMG 82876-66586-2), but I'm otherwise not finding much evidence that this song was issued as a single at all, other than the fact that a video was released.  This is the sort of thing that annoys me--when not one, but two official Britney websites announce a song will be released as a single, that's not good enough for Wikipedia, but this song is classified as a single despite the fact that it only appeared on a bonus disc of a best-of compilation and as a b-side of a couple of actual CD/DVD singles from this era.  While I appreciate that this song has it's own page, I'd like to see more indication of how this song is considered a single (a chart position would be nice).Heidijo236 (talk) 11:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

message: I don't understand why somewhere it says "megamix is a single by pop singer britney spears..." and somewhere "chris cox megamix is a single by pop singer britney spears..."? PlatinumFire (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MEGAMIX or CHRIS COX MEGAMIX
Talk:I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)

message: I have a scan of an original Wal-Mart "In The Zone" insert, containing the code and instructions I used to download "I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)" back in 2003, although I'm not sure if it counts as a source as the insert doesn't explicitly state which song can be downloaded with the code.Heidijo236 (talk) 18:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wal-Mart download source 

message: Is the official name (i've Just Begun) Having My Fun or I've Just Begun (having My Fun)?? I think it's the first one and this page should be renamed to (I've Just Begun) Having My Fun. Do U agree?? PlatinumFire (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  Check Spears's greatest hits album and the Wal-Mart digital release.  It's "I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)".  Charmed36 (talk) 19:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But on the cover it says (I've Just Begun) Having My Fun! look. PlatinumFire (talk) 19:31, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It because the top artwork is fake. there is a real artwork, but its not that! i have it on my pc when i downloaded it from the internet (it was either amazon or itunes cos i use both). i will try and find it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.243.19 --Apeaboutsims (talk) 07:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the pic i managed to print screen from the i tunes purchased menu. that is also why the front cover of the present cover is fake. because the the song title is incorrect and is fan artwork. Here is the artwork.--Apeaboutsims (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So should we change the artwork from the fake artwork?--Apeaboutsims (talk) 07:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and Altered --Jackex56 (talk) 01:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 
Talk:Association for Supply Chain Management

message: Unlike several consulting firms, this knowledge does NOT require the increase in sales, nor the layoff of employees to improve profits.
This is barely a real sentence.  What I think it is intending to say is also biased or at least unsupported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.252.99.10  (talk • contribs) 23:08, 6 March 2008
:This sentence has since been removed. My Gussie (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased or unsupported statements

message: I restored the inclusion of the original acronym American Production and Inventory Control Society. Although they currently market themselves as 'The Association for Operations Management' and have even created the new stretch of an acronym 'Advancing Productivity, Innovation, and Competitive Success', I think it is historically relevant to acknowledge the organization's original name used for almost 50 years. -GF  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.50.172.158 (talk) 10:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original name

message: Removed advertorial link at the bottom of the article (APICS CPIM Test Simulator)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.135.228 (talk) 08:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional content removed

message: Should the various certifications offered by APICS (CPIM/CFPIM/CSCP) be posted here instead of in their own separate articles?  Right now they seem kind of stubby. Garfunklette (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, as I don't think they warrant their own articles, and in any case, they seem to still be the main impact of the organization. My Gussie (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: APICS certifications
Talk:Lotta Svärd

message: In the lead section, it is stated that; 
"The organisation was suppressed by the government after the war".
However, later in the article, it is said that; 
"When the Continuation War ended, the Soviet Union demanded that all organisations it considered paramilitary, fascist or semi-fascist be banned. Lotta Svärd was one of the groups which was disbanded...  However, a new organisation called Suomen Naisten Huoltosäätiö (Support Foundation of Finnish Women) was started which took over much of the old property". 
Perhaps I don't know the whole story, but disbanding the Lotta Svard then immediately reforming it as a civilian version doesn't sound like suppressing it.
Astor Thrope (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language regarding the disbanding of Lotta Svard
Talk:Richard Wawro

message: He was diagnosed quite early on then - autism having been recognised not long before - and interestingly had additional physical problems - the cataracts.  In the absence of his medical records or a more detailed diagnosis, it is still worth considering whether he had a constellation of conditions including or producing autism by a mechanism unlike most.  Good pictures, and very encyclopaedic. Midgley 18:16, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we show some of his work on the page? --120.146.157.227 (talk) 10:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics?
Talk:Spinning roller coaster

message: I think that the 4th dimensional coasters need their own page separate from the spinning coasters since they are none alike. Even RCDB doesn't have the two listed remotely under the same classification. (Coasterman1234 02:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 4th Dimension coasters must have an horizontal axis rotation, and in spinning roller coaster is vertical. I wrote the spanish version, and I write two articles, one for 4D coasters and oter for spinning coasters.--81.172.11.39 01:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: FYI, the new 4th Dimension roller coaster article is here. It was split from this article some time ago. --Skylights76 (talk) 02:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article 

message: I opposed the merging of this artice with the X roller coaster article. Instead, I think X should be referenced in the article, and vice versa. Since X is merely one example of a spinning coaster, merging the two would be like merging the McDonald's article with the fast food article. Dan
:I agree, spinning roller coasters, and 4th dimension roller coasters are diferent type of rides. Please, "unmerge" it. In spanish we have two articles.--81.172.13.154 00:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well. The two Arrow Multi-dimension coasters (X & Eejanaika) are fully unique and should not be included in this article (a flat ride, or a coaster that is mass-copied should be included in a page like this but not the multi-dimensions).  I agree that X should reference this article and vice-versa. (Coasterman1234 19:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with X 

message: A look at the list on RCDB shows that there are other companies making spinning coasters. Perhaps we ought to make the various sections company-neutral (e.g. "Inward-facing seats" and "Outward-facing seats" as possible section heads) and include the already-mentioned companies in the text as examples only. Maybe someone (I'm not saying me...necessarily) needs to go through the whole RCDB list, looking at the company names and the pictures, to get a handle on the various companies, configurations, and other aspects. Or maybe some nice website out there has done the work for us...--Skylights76 (talk) 10:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've reorganized the article according to layout type rather than manufacturer, and added references to other manufacturers. --Skylights76 (talk) 02:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other companies
Talk:Desert Air Force

message: This article contradicts itself, there is no sourced evidence that USAAF Squadrons were part of DAF, as part of the 9th Air Force they may have supported the British Army but so did the USAAF in Europe, didn't make them part of 2 TAF, I think this reference in the first few paragraphs should be removed--Pandaplodder (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cross was Acting Air Commodore at the start of 43.  he didn't make AVM until 1956.GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:32, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked the citation and the ranks are as given there. It's from the UK Official History so although not guaranteed to be right, is most likely to be so. Stephen Kirrage talk - contribs 00:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The London Gazette gives Cross's promotion to temporary Grp Captain as 14th July 1943. GraemeLeggett (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: USAAF aircraft in the Middle East all carried an RAF fin flash as can be seen by looking at contemporary photographs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.221.26 (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  USAAF involvement 

message: no statistics here? the jagdgeschwader 27 downed about 1100 aircraft for the loss of 200. is it possible that somebody brings correct numbers to show the inferiority to luftwaffe in this campaign.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HROThomas (talk • contribs) 22:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  statistics 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Desert Air. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  MB 20:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desert Air listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Arthur Levitt

message: I don't know about the POV issue, but this article is superficial and inaccurate. It wasn't Levitt personally but the SEC under his leadership that issued that Enron exemption. I will clarify. I will add that he has come under criticism since stepping down as chairman. --Mantanmoreland 18:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Kroll Report's costs are a perfect example of the bungling nature of municipal governance in San Diego. basic I thought the article was about Levitt. jiHymas@himivest.com 69.158.153.209 19:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: San Diego? Kroll Report?
Talk:Open community

message: I wonder if open and closed communities are more or less the same idea as that of closure of communities - see . Specifically I wonder if we could define open communities as 'easy to enter', and closed as 'difficult to enter' by outsiders. Some more citations would be useful.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Galois extension

message: Actually, I'm not totally sure about my recent edit, in particular I'm not completely sure which part of the result is due to Artin. Dmharvey 19:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artin? 

message: The article reads:
"An important theorem of Emil Artin states that a finite extension E/F is Galois if and only if any one of the following conditions holds:
* E/F is a normal extension and a separable extension.
* E is the splitting field of a separable polynomial with coefficients in F.
* [E:F] = |Aut(E/F)|; that is, the degree of the field extension is equal to the order of the automorphism group of E/F."''
One entirely reasonable interpretation of this is of the form:
    "X" is equivalent to "A or B or C".  
(For example: "n belongs to the set {1,2,3}" is equivalent to "n=1 or n=2 or n=3".)
The correct statement, however, should say unambiguously: 
"Given a finite extension E/F, the following are equivalent definitions of what it means to say E/F is Galois:
1.  E/F is a normal extension and a separable extension.
2.  E is the splitting field of a separable polynomial with coefficients in F.
3.  [E:F] = |Aut(E/F)|; that is, the degree of the field extension is equal to the order of the automorphism group of E/F."Daqu 21:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made it unambiguous. Wording is a bit clumsy though. Algebraist 17:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Highly ambiguous wording
Talk:Family BASIC

message: "With the addition of the Famicom Disk System, this meant the Famicom could actually be used as a simple desktop computer". - This is complete nonsense. How is this supposed to work? Obviously, you can't insert both the Family BASIC cartridge and the FDS' RAM adapter into the Famicom's cartridge slot at the same time. :) Family BASIC (HVC-007) saves its data to cassette tape using the Famicom Data Recorder (HVC-008), which connects to the Family Basic keyboard, which in turn connects to the Famicom's expansion port. ExciteBike also was not programmed using Famicom BASIC, as the article states, it just saves the custom track data to cassette tape using the same Data Recorder peripherial. Unless somebody objects, I'm changing the article soon. NewRisingSun 19:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oddly enough, there is at least one computer based on the Famicom, but they don't work that way, either.  Thanks for making a note of this!  50.206.59.42 (talk) 23:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  FDS and Family BASIC Together Doesn't Work 

message: Bomberman was written in 1980 purely to serve as a tech demo for Hudson Soft's BASIC compiler, which I thought was interesting. It's from the Bomberman_(1983_video_game) article.  Family Guy Guy (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bomberman was written in 1980 purely to serve as a tech demo for Hudson Soft's BASIC compiler
Talk:Spokane, Portland and Seattle 700

message: I own a copy of the 'official' delivery photograph of the SP&S 700. It's marked in the bottom right corner "Lacey" "Spokane" "16997" and was apparently taken on the delivery date of June 21, 1938
While I think it would be a good addition to this article, I'm unsure of it's copyright status and don't want to start off on the wrong foot. Anybody have any suggestions to find out it's status? --Oldhippy1947 18:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delivery Photograph
Talk:Top Girls

message: I did an extensive rewrite of the plot synopsis section for two reasons: firstly, factual errors; secondly, stylistic concerns. I'm hoping I haven't stepped on any toes; this section was singled out for editing. There seemed to be some confusion as to why people were "visiting" the office in act two, for example,which needed to be clarified. the language in general was a little talky and colloquial so i tried to make it more professional sounding and organize more clearly.
content-wise, its not yet complete - I think what's there has been improved, but it still is missing some major points. I'll probably fill that in tomorrow. it's late now.
Zweidinge (talk) 04:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot synopsis
Talk:1982, Janine

message: The memories of past lovers isn't that which leads the principle to attempt suicide. It is in fact the memory of being caught shoplifting which induces the act. I would correct this on the main page, but it seems as if the corrections are controlled by a group of individuals or registered users who dislike correction by random folks such as myself. So, should anyone one of those comes along and agree with this remark, they can go ahead and correct it. Otherwise, we'll let those who come to this page and decide not to read the book persist in ignorance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.177.153.164 (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 
Talk:Inline citation

message: Could anyone explain to a poor ignoramus like me what the actual differences are between a citation and a reference as used on WP--Light current 19:34, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no difference. - -The Spooky One  (talk to me) 21:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and references