lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anderitum

message: It has been suggested that this article is to be merged with Pevensey Castle. Please see Talk:Pevensey_Castle#Merge for discussion.  ++ MortimerCat (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not, the castle is not so ruinous as to deter films, local events e.g. outdoor music/cinema.  The Roman heritage merits its own article, see the map of roads, forests and recorded history too. I venture to suggest the decade since this idea was floated and many contributions since might (just might) also add credence to the keeping them separate.- Adam37 Talk 19:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortunately the discussion petered out to leave the articles as separate entries, though of course each mentioning the other. Richard Nevell (talk) 20:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Pevensey castle
Talk:Portus Adurni

message: Hey Jeremy!
Your article is very informative and well written. I just have a few suggestions:
This sentence: "Even after the departure of the Roman Army its location and strong walls made it attractive as a fortress, and it became an Anglo-Saxon high-status residence with great hall and tower, and the Roman gateways were rebuilt." first needs a comma after Army and also sounds  a little wordy. Maybe it could be reworked a little
Also, the sections you split your article up in seem to be chronological, but I was a little confused as far as the timeline of the site. 
Overall, it looks really good!
Susan
Hi Jeremy. You have written a well chronologically organized encyclopedia article that includes interesting details along the way. I especially liked the reference to the Notitia dignitatum. Since this fort has been occupied for such a long time, you might consider citing so more references to it from historical literature. Other than that and some grammatical errors, I think your article is good to go!
Ken D'Aquila Kfd182 03:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mui Wo

message: Since this article is related to HK, I suggest switching the note to editors to say "use Hong Kong English", rather than EngvarB. Kdm852 (talk) 09:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the difference between HK English and British English is the inclusion of syntax and grammar errors to match Cantonese use, I would suggest that HK English is not used for this article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest Switch to HK English
Category talk:Malaysia templates

message: why dont we use a navigation bar for State template which uses the functions of v.d.e, and "hide/show" ? this can help:
1) make v, d, and especially editing easier. normally now i have to type for e.g: "template: sabah" in the search box, which is quite inconvenient.
2) simplify the look or layout of the article webpage. if u see Template: Selangor for e.g, it is HUGE and takes up lotsa space. the "hide" function can help simplify things.--kawaputra 10:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you are right. All those templates are technically outdated anyway because it was constructed long ago. __earth (Talk) 15:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I have done Template: Sabah. lemme know if its ok or not, yea. kawaputra 14:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: quite pleasing. __earth (Talk) 05:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: State Templates, a suggestion..

message: i made Template:Ethnic groups in Malaysia since we dont have any yet. theres 3 samples there. any comments? kawaputra 13:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good enough already. Good job! Chongkian (talk) 02:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnic groups
Talk:Indian star tortoise

message: How do you create a new article.–Wikiman1324 (talk) 23:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Transsexual News Telegraph

message: I'll freely confess to not being a Wiki expert, but I was briefly the editor of TNT, the subject of the article, and know about as much as anybody except Gail about it.
I dont' think there's anything particularly controversial about what I've said here, it's pretty much dry facts about TNT, and I've cited sources where appropriate.
But, it seems silly to cite a magazine as a source in a page about a magazine. So, for example, I have no cite about the back covers, but if you look at a pile of back issues of TNT you'll see the back covers. What constitutes published research about a magazine? Anyone with a copy of the magazine can read it, anyone else can't check a quote anyway.
Although little has been published specifically about TNT, anyone reading gender theory will find numerous references to the zine. So it's difficult to find appropriate references, yet it seems unarguably a useful article. 
--Anniepoo 10:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing
Talk:Barnstaple (UK Parliament constituency)

message: In 1885, did it also switch from being a county to a borough constituency? john k 20:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This person was MP for Barnstaple from 1806-1812 and appears as such in the table.  The redlink claims that he was born in 1782, but according to Stanley Sadie (ed): The New Grove Dictionary of Opera (Oxford University Press, 1992) vol 4 pp 661-2 he was an opera manager in London from 1781 to 1815 and died in 1825;  his birthdate is given in Grove as c1753.  He was also MP for Leominster from 1797 to 1802, which seems unlikely if he was born in 1782! --GuillaumeTell (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Taylor
Talk:Sha Tau Kok

message: Unidentified user 219.77.84.68 added the unreferenced tag. Most of the references to Sha tau kok in published works deal with the town many decades ago, and more up to date information would require it to be published and authored by someone first before you can make any references available. Given the lack of references, the tag will be here for a very long time. 
The difficulty with obscure places is just that, it's obscure where current and up to date info comes from users who have a familiarity with the area. That, would imply that most of the article can be termed original work, and ought to be deleted, since it cannot satisfy Wikipedia's thirst for referencing. Similary other articles on villages and places where there is no referencable material. Either you accept first hand knowledge from longstanding wikipedians with a link to those places, or deletion is the logical endpoint of requiring references for which little up to date publications are lacking. Dylanwhs (talk) 18:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced tag 

message: :Historically it was considered a closed town. But Sha Tau Kok actually began opening in June 2022, followed by the second phase that started January 2024.  So can it still be deemed as closed nowadays if they are now open to tourists?49.180.87.160 (talk) 20:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it still closed?
Talk:Yulia Volkova

message: I was going to do some serious chopping due to WP:BLP issues with unsourced negative claims but it seems that the claims are consistent with the documentary that is wiki-linked. The documentary should be cited as the source then. --Alfadog 06:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP issues 

message: There should have been a discussion place here.
*Oppose requested move.  Insufficient grounds given in request.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: A quick Google gives 69,700 English ghits to Yulia and only 39,100 English ghits to Julia. That's not a big difference (the difference is bigger if you don't restrict it to English) but it certainly doesn't support a move to Julia. Andrewa (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: A look at the history of the Julia Volkova redirect shows that the current article name at "Yulia Volkova" is the result of an improper cut and paste move.
Furthermore, it was sloppily done, with a talk page remaining at Talk:Julia Volkova separate and distinct from this talk page.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Also involves improper cut and paste move

message: In the biography, her first name is used and her surname is used as well. Shouldn't it be changed to just one because it looks messy. 19:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.  I changed them all to just her surname, as the Wikipedia help pages recommend.Ariadne55 (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I tried to clean up the article and give citations for many of the statements. I also took out the section on children because they are already mentioned in the article. There are some things I would like to ask about though:
Is there a link that states her son's name is Samir? There was no citation and I never saw an article, but if someone has confirmation of this, please add it in or drop the website here. Also about the vocal cyst, there was an interview where Yulia said her voice became different after she had her first child due to some kind of acid reflux during pregnancy (or something like that) and didn't mention anything about surgery. I also read somewhere that medicine healed up her throat and she avoided having surgery. So if anyone has any citations for those two things, please speak up because I think it needs to be incorporated into the article, but I am just not sure on some things. Also, if anything else is wrong with what I did, please reply. Thx. Megshere (talk) 00:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions
Talk:Frontier Closed Area

message: The article as it stand is completely misleading about the need for a Closed Area Permit. Every adult going through the checkpoints into the Closed Area need to show a permit to be granted entry. It's just that permanent resident's permit last for much longer than those that are not resident, and renewal is granted automatically. KTC (talk) 07:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading regarding permit
Talk:Ivan Shapovalov

message: I have reverted the claim that this person is a pedophile until I can get feedback that TheSun.co.uk is a reliable source. Isn't this mag along the lines of US supermarket tabloids? If the source is acceptable it can be put back in. ==killing sparrows 18:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's a reliable source. Anyway, the claim isn't disputed in anyway, Ivan admitted to his attraction to young girls. --Moffollo 19:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, we cannot use a tabloid source for a claim this controversial. I've removed it. — coelacan — 00:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Ivan Shapovalov appears to be something of a provocateur, according to his article in the Russian Wikipedia (which anyone can read with Google Translate). It says he qualified in medicine, worked briefly in child and adolescent psychiatry and, two years after his degree, switched to advertising. After five years of that he had the idea of a "teenage girl band with sexual overtones." (See "Teen Spirit" by Gary Shteyngart, in The New Yorker, March 10, 2003). He told The Sun newspaper (2nd October 2003) that he preferred under-age girls, with predictable results. He also tried to get another girl singer to dress up as a suicide bomber to perform on the anniversary of 9/11, twice, both in Moscow and in London, but was (conveniently?) prevented from doing so. He seems to have been trying to shock, on the basis that "all publicity is good publicity." Which means we have to question everything he says. NRPanikker (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: reliable sourcing

message: Сейчас Шапо работает с группой "Вена". Это стало известно, когда 19 апреля Кирилл(участник группы Вена) выложил Вконтактике видео, в котором он, Мухобой и Ваня пишут новую песню. Предположительно, дело было в Ульяновске. Хотя хз, но рядом протекает река "Волга". Вот вам инфа, вот ссылка на ютубик с тем видео - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_Hgji9DpOQ
Гугль Транслате, пидоры! :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Славик Беляев (talk • contribs) 20:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  in 2011
Talk:Barons Court (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I note use of . I believe Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885-1972 (), F. W. S. Craig 1972, will tend to support current article content. Laurel Bush 11:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have put the above mentioned book and two other sources in a new reference section. --Gary J (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference
Talk:Bassetlaw (UK Parliament constituency)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2019 Bassetlaw by-election. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "2019 Bassetlaw by-election" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pandora archive

message: GB 00:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The archive is now part of the Australian Web Archive (which WP does not have a page on). What is the most elegant way of putting this without copying the website entry? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . I've just found your comment, after creating a brief stub article for the AWB. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian Web Archive
Talk:Langnese

message: What is the relation of Wall's and Langnese?  ——Nussknacker胡桃夹子^.^tell me... 10:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the relation of [[Wall's ice cream]] and Langnese? 

message: Langnese is a Dutch brand. Not German. It's owned by Unilever, which is Dutch too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.56.29.167 (talk) 20:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure you're confusing it with the other Langnese, a company that distributes Honey. But even that one has headquarters in Germany. Wheatstack (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ola-Langnese 

message: Before I continue, I'll just recap the situation here so it's clear for everyone:
The "Heartbrand" ice cream brand owned by Unilever is known by many different names in different countries. "Langnese" is merely the German name.
So unless every single version of the Heartbrand name gets its own article, this one should go. You can find all this information in the Unilever article, by the way. SergioGeorgini (talk) 00:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is superfluous and should be deleted.
Talk:Mpio

message: To most people in server/storage/networking, MPIO means MultiPath Input Output, as used with SAN (Storage Area Networking).  Disambig page should list/link Multipath I/O.
Titaniumlegs (talk) 03:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Disambiguation 
Talk:Battersea (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Should this be removed? it does not really fit in with the tone of the rest of the article, adds little and lacks citations. Also Shapurji Saklatvala was never MP for this constituency, but one of its predecessors (Battersea North), so if the information on him is needed it should surely be on the Battersea North page.
:With respect, you have not signed your comment of 2016. It has not had its subject-matter interfered with yet.  So your punctiliousness about style and conformity does not match your own posts which need ~~~~ after them, kindly acknowledge the error.  I think the word that grates with you is 'trivia' understandably not wishing to see that multiply; and agreeably too.  I will rephrase.  It is a bad habit from more trivial articles shall we say and those of a more light-hearted content.- Adam37 Talk 12:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Section
Talk:Polymelia

message: The article caption says the photo is a dog but caption for the link to the file says it's a piglet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.198.211.245 (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption 

message: "In humans and most land-dwelling animals, this means having five or more limbs"
This seems obviously untrue when you consider land-dwelling insect species both if "most" means number of unique species or number of individuals.  Thoughts on a qualifier to indicate which animals are meant to be included or should it just get dropped?  174.71.124.79 (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  five or more 

message: *See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axsn16niisc at time  3:03 . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra leg on a lizard's tail
Talk:Bochner space

message: Isn't it required to take equivalence classes of functions which
coincide almost everywhere? ASlateff 128.131.37.74 10:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically speaking, yes, it is. The usual abuse of notation (identifying an Lp "function" with its equivalence class) is in play here, as it is in Evans' book. Sullivan.t.j 13:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong definition? 

message: Maybe it will be more clear if there are some specific reference to which definition of the Evans' book we are talking about 131.114.63.2 (talk) 11:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: edit, there isn't enough material in Evans' book about bochner spaces M.carotta (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing reference
Talk:Jim Carlton

message: I have stubbed this article. One, its lone source, SourceWatch, is NOT a reliable source. It can be edited by anyone. Check here. Two, Google turns up nothing on this person, beyond the SourceWatch listing. It turns up plenty of people by the name Jim Carlton, yes, but not of the fellow apparently the subject of the article. Therefore, without verifiability, and for all I can determine independently, this article could be nothing more than a somewhat elaborate (create an article at SourceWatch, cite it in WP, and then defend it as a reliable source as was done here), very plausible-sounding hoax.  CyberAnth 11:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you really need help using Google?  Try searching for "Jim Carlton" and "Malcolm Fraser".  It's not hard.  --Steve  (Slf67)  talk  11:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Interesting that "google turns up nothing", yet the Australian parliament website mentions him repeatedly.  These assertions are really amusing.  Guettarda 15:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubbing
Talk:Beaconsfield (UK Parliament constituency)

message: So which constituencies covered this area before 1974? — OwenBlacker (Talk) 15:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See South Buckinghamshire (UK Parliament constituency). I am not sure if this is the whole answer, as I am typing this without access to my reference books, but the town of Beaconsfield was in South Buckinghamshire.  --Gary J (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The local government areas in the 1974 Beaconsfield constituency were Beaconsfield Urban District, Eton Rural District and part of Wycombe Rural District. In the 1950-74 period Beaconsfield UD and Eton RD were combined with a part of Amersham RD, in the South Buckinghamshire constituency. The whole of Wycombe RD was then part of the Wycombe seat. --Gary J (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before 1974? 

message: I corrected this from 51% leave to 49% based on the source data. Chemist904 (talk) 23:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU referendum estimate
Talk:Bedford (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Unreferenced. Is it a genuine candidate or a prank? If genuine, needs a reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senotshtooms (talk • contribs) 14:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's genuine. All you needed to do was check the BBC web site - here's the entry for Bedford. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate Faruk Choudhury 
Talk:Outlaw (2007 film)

message: Apart from the fact that this is a rather poor film, it has been made considerably worse by the fact that the camera operator seems to be suffering from a severe case of Delerium Tremens!
Rosa Lichtenstein (talk) 11:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Outlaw (2007film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 19#Outlaw (2007film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 17:17, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Outlaw (2007film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Saponification

message: My apologies, but my O-chem skills are nil
There *appears* to be a conflict between this page and the biodiesel page. The biodiesel suggests that adding alkali to triglycerides produces diesel, the saponification suggests that it produces soap. Now I'm not a professional organic chemist or anything, but I'm pretty sure that soap (even SoftSoap) is not usable as biodiesel, nor vice versa. Perhaps someone knowledgeable could tweak one section or the other, or produce a soap-vs-biodiesel or triglycerides-plus-alkali section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riventree (talk • contribs) 20:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare: Biodiesel 

message: I think it may be beneficial to move the oil paint section to its own article. That way it would be possible to expand on the research being done in this specific area without overwhelming this general article. Acwageman (talk) 19:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oil paints 

message: The proposal is to merge alkaline hydrolysis into Saponification.  As applied to conventional organic esters, they are the same thing.  Saponification is presently slanted toward base hydrolysis of fats to give soaps, which is a traditional but insufficient definition.  To quote from March's organic textbook:
"Ester hydrolysis is usually catalyzed by acids or bases ... When bases catalyze the reaction, the attacking species is the more powerful nucleophile  OH-. This reaction is called saponification and gives the salt of the acid."
Provisos:
*Now, the main catch with this merger is that lots of stuff can be hydrolyzed aside from carboxylic acid esters.  But presently alkaline hydrolysis seems only to discuss saponification.
*We could broaden out alkaline hydrolysis, but such jargon seems uncommon in other parts of chemistry.  So, I dont know how we fill it in.
*We have SN1CB mechanism, which is very specific and narrow reaction of metal ammine complexes.
*Hydrolysis devotes a section to saponification.
--Smokefoot (talk) 23:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection with no support and stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 13:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Allan Wu

message: I just checked this guy's contributions page. He has vandalized a lot of other pages too. --Destron Commander 11:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Be careful, i think it will comeback again, "Lan Jiao" is rude word in Chinese. --Aleenf1 14:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 218.186.8.12

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Cataract Gorge

message: The sentence "The building is now an interpretive museum." should say something like "After being disused for a long period of time, the building is now an interpretive museum." It would be good to include some details of the redevelopment process.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.194.103 (talk) 11:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)