lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pennant Hills, New South Wales

message: I don't think that schools from Cherrybrook, Normanhurst, Hornsby, Wahroonga, Pymble, Cherrybrook and St Ives need to be listed on this page: it could simply be noted that other schools, both public and private, exist in sorrounding suburbs. I've left them there for the moment, as this might be considered subjective, but I don't think it's relevant. Will remove if there're no objections (please voice them here). Skittled 06:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Action: Removed the lines referring to specific schools, instead mentioning that other schools are available in the sorrounding areas. There are lists, such as List_of_selective_high_schools_in_New_South_Wales which could be added to this section, if someone could do that cleanly. Skittled 22:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools

message: "Within Pennant Hills is Louise Way, which is the filming location for "Cherrybrook" in the famous Briggs family remake of the famous Melbourne-made soap opera Neighbours made by the Seven Network (ATN-7)"
I am questioning the validity, verifiability, and notability of this statement, on several levels. First is the POV 'fluffing' throughoput this single sentance. Second, was Neighbours ever "remade" for commercial television?
As usuall, re-add if verifiable evidence can be presented. -- saberwyn 09:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Famous" remake? 

message: I've heard Pennant Hills referred to as 'Penno' by locals... I've even done so myself. It might not be commonplace, but that's not the same as referring to it as a myth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Decursus (talk • contribs) 07:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penno is a myth? 

message: It seems bizzare to have a heading for topography, entertainment etc. when there is only about one sentence of information below. Should we merge the headings or add more information? Mr john luke 11:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many headings 

message: Does anyone else recall this name applying (I think) to Thompson's Corner in the early 1950's? Rumiton 10:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thorby's Corner
Talk:List of geneticists

message: Either merge or 1 genetics + 1 biochemistry. 
Almost everyone here is one or the other--for the few notable in both, they can go on both lists.  DGG 06:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: for his excellent work in adding so many. 
DGG 07:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I thank TB Hecht 

message: Should the page titles for this entire category be changed to  "List of notable chemists [etc].
It makes the purpose clearer , and differentiates them from category, which is simple and automatically all the chemists who happen to have actual pages here.?
List of notable... is used for many other similar purposes. I suppose we in science can be distinctive and use ours the way it is, but it would be useful to have it said explicitly.DGG 04:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: wording of title

message: This extraordinarily excellent list might benefit from some indication of relative importance--perhaps a separate list?DGG 21:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: most notable

message: There are a great many red links in this list, indicating people that by Wikipedia conventions are not notable. Some of them probably do need articles, and someone should create them. For the moment I shall do nothing, but I'll come back in, say, October 2023 to see if the situation has improved.   Athel cb (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many red links
File talk:Solar sys2.jpg

message: Do you think we could sub Pluto with the Kuiper belt? Serendipodous 06:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I've changed the licensing tag on the image because the modifications made by User:Nbound are not significant enough to make this image a separate image, in terms of licensing, from :Image:solar sys.jpg. That said, it's still PD. —Cuiviénen 05:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Licensing
Talk:I. P. Sharp Associates

message: On IPSANET, the software is called 666 BOX.  Which was it officially called ? John Vandenberg 07:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  666 mailbox 

message: I have changed reference to Victoria and Halifax offices to Ottawa. Those offices supported APL time-sharing rather than RCN. I was technical director of the Ottawa office for much of1966/67.
APL section
Although Brian Daly was an Etobicoke native, he  was based in Ottawa when he was selling APL. Appellation ZOO may have originated with Mike Goudge. Somebody should ask Ian. Rdmoore6 (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  March3, 2017 edits
Talk:Minor sixth

message: I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 20:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: I am removing the claim about the minor 6th being the hardest interval to ID by ear.  It is original research if it's based on the data directly, and it's relying on a self-published source if it's based on the their interpretations.  Even if it was an acceptable source, it would only be valid for the narrow group of people who choose to take that online, English-language test.  --Allen (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  humanbenchmark.com 

message: *The 27:32 subminor sixthJohannes Kepler (2009). The Harmonies of the World, p.107. . Maybe subminor third inverted as note reads: "Here 'sixth' (sexta) should probably be 'third' (tertia)." of 906 cents (the Pythagorean major sixth)
I removed the above given the note. Hyacinth (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Subminor sixth

message: In the infobox, 51:32 is listed as a ratio in JI for the minor sixth. However, this has no citation, and it is not mentioned anywhere else in the article. Should this be removed? Ezhao02 (talk) 02:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can safely say that 51 is outside of the (admittedly vague) range of "small numbers" specified for JI. However, the JI article itself could be improved in this regard.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  51:32 in Infobox
Talk:San Felipe, Baja California

message: The history section seems to be copied from here (according to Firefox's "Page Info" function, the page was last modified 2005-05-18). Thoughts? -Branddobbe 07:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: "San Felipe is located in a unique ecosystem, where the desert meets the sea." Given that "unique" denotes something that is one of a kind, is this really the only place on earth where desert meets sea? Perhaps "rare" or "unusual" or "uncommon" might be better wording.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.97.11 (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unique?

message: ===River delta and tidal waves===
How does the river delta form the tidal waves of the coast? Teemu Ruskeepää (talk) 14:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual details 

message: How does the river delta form the tidal waves of the coast? Teemu Ruskeepää (talk) 14:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: River delta and tidal waves

message: Too much information about hotels in the history section. I will remove and summarize to solve the advertisement issue. I will also attempt to be factual about the Tourism section without removing too much, there must be a cited source otherwise it will have to be removed. I will look for sources but could use a little help. Anyone for a trip to the library?  -- Cdw ♥'s ♪ ♫(talk) 00:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  TMI 

message: From the article: "One fisherman was killed and another lay in coma after a ship from Sea Shepherd Conservation Society rammed a local fishing boat, breaking the boat in two on December 31, 2020.[1]" - This is the exact opposite of what happened.  There is a video from the Sea Shepherd boat showing the "local fishing boat" (violent pirates fishing for critically endangered fish for illegal chinese black market animal products using illegal gill nets which have been the cause of the imminent extinction of the Vaquita porpoise) were the ones who were the aggressors.  I will add sources later and edit the article.  The article should mention the controversy around the Vaquita porpoise.  The article should also mention that the annual rainfall is less than 2 inches per year. Isonomia-107 (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critically Endangered Vaquita Porpoise and Local Illegal Fishing
Talk:Atari Age

message: AtariAge in its current incarnation was started in 2001, which is when Albert Yarusso joined the site. The site founded in 1998 was Atari 2600 Nexus, started by Bilstien, not Bilstien and Yarusso.
Atari Age is also the name of a magazine, which is where the site took its name from. That might be worth a mention, and perhaps an article in its own right.
:It was the name of a 2600/5200 gaming magazine published by Atari and sent to registered owners of Atari gaming consoles. —Pelladon 00:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John FitzAlan, 2nd Baron Arundel

message: I am unlinking John's son Thomas, as the Thomas Arundel the link calls is a contemporary of John, couldn't be his son, and in fact is another man's son.  I am not sure who John's Thomas is, so i cannot replace the link with the correct one.  Cheers.  Lindsay H. 07:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas

message: The sources given have been misread. Margaret is the 2nd baron's sister, not daughter. I'm going to remove her from the list. Scrapbkn (talk) 21:48, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Margaret
Talk:The Herbalist

message: Dear sir,
I have  received an enquiry from my friend about
 HERBAL PRODUCT MONOPOLINE ROOTS(KANAMRUTAKADUGANDHA)FROM INDIA.
Please be kindly explain the above herbal product and help me to send the same to him.
Thanking you sir,
Kalavathi
kalaexports2003@yahoo.com
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.99.122.9 (talk) 
BotanicChoice:  Botanic Choice does not sell this herb. You can try checking online at TradeKey.com. Unsigned commented added by  WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is not really about the book titled The Herbalist but rather about the entity called The Indiana Botanic Garden which is loosely affiliated with the book.  The article should appear under its proper title. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I propose (and I will peform the operation if you concur) that this page be redirected to Indiana Botanic Garden, and all content here copied to that page.  Also, please remember to sign your talk page posts by typing '~~~~' after your message. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

text: When I proposed this merge, I didn't realize that the page was about an herb RETAILER, as opposed to a true botanical garden.  As an article about a retailer, I think this page is basically spam. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I have a copy of this book which my wife's grandfather Frank Arnold (188?-1951) used to identify healing plants in Virginia and he ordered some non-local ones from Botanical Gardens in New Haven, Conn (ads are throughout the book)67.183.4.234 (talk) 20:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More to the story about the book
Talk:Subjective units of distress scale

message: In the article, the definition is a scale from 0-10.   The example given is: Typically, you can ask the client, "On a scale of one to ten, where one is the best you can feel and ten is the worst, how do you feel right now?"
Dehughes (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency
Talk:Heavenly Lake of Tianshan

message: Location: Google earth has a different location: 30 km south of Fukang city and 45 km east of Urumchi. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 05:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: X
Talk:Ice-free port

message: *Name: I think this page should be more properly called 'warm water port' as this is the more common term - a fact the article itself indicates.
*Rampant POV: This page uncritically accepts the 'geopolitical' Cold War analysis in which the term originates. Surely this should be reexamined in the absence of any Soviet documents supporting this rather ludicrous strategic aim (ever heard of Vietnam, people???) and given the changed complexion of Afghanistan (from freedom fighters to global terrorists!).  At the very least supply some citations for this guff.--Jack Upland 07:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anarchism in Greece

message: , hi and welcome to WP. I 'd like to brought to your attention the policy of WP on Sources we use. They must be reliable. See WP:RS. Sites as athens indymedia, or anarchist blogs, since they host user generated content, they are deemed unreliable. We cant use them to add anything at the article. See more specifically WP:USERG. So, this addition bears some problems.  If you have any questions, pls dont hesitate to ask here (many users might reply) or at my talk page. Take care and enjoy your first edits at WP! Cinadon36 20:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metropolitan Catastrophes Group 

message: Can we ban this user from this page as they clearly are intent on trolling it and ignoring now multiples peoples protestations that what they are doing is incorrect and unhepful. They probably have some strange agenda. I dont kow about how to go about doing this, maybe User:Cinadon36 or [[User:Czar can help here? SP00KYtalk 11:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel your concerns  (SP00KY) but he is a new user and we should give him some time to adapt.  pls engage with other users at Talk Page. Unless you do so, you might get blocked for edit warring. Cinadon36 14:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  , I left a message on  talk page after my last revert. Blocking isn't punitive—it is only meant to prevent disruption—so would only be needed if they continue to edit war and ignore the talk page. czar 01:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lorenzo Fracassa

message: Veneti A and Poulakidakos S. (2020) Video-activism and small-scale resistance: The Visual Rhetoric of Youtube Videos by the Greek Anarchist Group Rouvikonas. In N. Crick (Eds) The Rhetoric of Social Movements: Networks, Power, and New Media”. Routledge (forthcoming June 2020), chapter 4   Cinadon36 15:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An interesting article
File talk:Jakarta slumlife65.JPG

message: What is the kid holding in the other hand? it looks like a mobile phone. CarrKnight
:No, it's just some sort of plastic piece.  The back to some electronic device or something similar. - 24.23.37.62 (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

message: thats real sad... yuk : (  that barbie is also covered in what? gross stuff. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spicy Banana (talk • contribs) 02:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow. scary. 

message: Congratulations, Jonathan. This is amazing. Kripkenstein (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations
Talk:Japanese submarine I-25

message: This article says the sub was sunk Sept 3, USS Patterson (DD-392) says Aug 25, and the Appendix to Hashimoto says July 11 "East of Kolombangara."
==== About the www.offbeatoregon.com citation: ====
One of the citations on this page leads to a newspaper article I wrote. I've been advised to declare this connection so it won't look like a conflict of interest, or as if I'm trying to pull a fast one for some free publicity. FWIW I make no money on my articles and the archives are licensed under Creative Commons 3.0. For more info, please see my Talk page. Finn-jd-john (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking 

message: One of the citations on this page leads to a newspaper article I wrote. I've been advised to declare this connection so it won't look like a conflict of interest, or as if I'm trying to pull a fast one for some free publicity. FWIW I make no money on my articles and the archives are licensed under Creative Commons 3.0. For more info, please see my Talk page. Finn-jd-john (talk) 17:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the www.offbeatoregon.com citation:
Talk:Type B1 submarine

message: This page contradicts Japanese submarine I-21, which states that I-21 was sunk in Feb. 1944 not Nov. 1943 - which is correct? Drutt (talk) 20:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I-21

message: I added a link to I-15, but I forgot to explain what I did when I submitted the edit, though I did flag it as a "minor" edit.  Sorry about that -- I'm pretty new to Wikipedia.  My first contribution is a short page on Japanese submarine I-15. Grotius1648 (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit -- added link to I-15 

message: are there any know surviving skematics or blueprint of these submarines? and if so should that be added?69.115.204.217 (talk) 01:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  blueprints/ skematics
Talk:Don Vicente Rama Memorial National High School

message: The following problems need to be resolved before it can measure up to any kind quality assurances:
*The article needs a lot of copyediting.
*The quotes are dull and consist of nothing but stereotypical school pep.
*The image syntax is really terrible and the choice of images is very unencyclopedic. Pictures of small student groups are not the least bit relevant to an encyclopedia. A few (about 4-6) pictures of exterior and interior is more than enough.
*The article is in effect unverifiable since this school "School Improvement Plan" doesn't seem to be something one can find at the local library.
*A lot of the article reads like a pamphlet and there is an excruciating amount of detail about the education of individual teachers, the merits of members of the student's union and other forms of trivia.
*There are too many lists and tables. If they can't easily be converted into prose, they should probably be removed altogether.
*There are several references to Kevin Ray, the article author himself, which may be a problem. Even if this reference is relevant, linking to one's own user page in article mainspace is not. See Wikipedia:Avoid self-references.
When improving the article, try to write with someone who has no initial interest or knowledge about the topic in mind. Currently, it reads more like a recruitment pamphlet than an encyclopedic article.
Peter Isotalo 09:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Japanese submarine I-21

message: According to this she was sunk by air attack on 29 Nov. 1943, not depth-charged by a destroyer on 4 February 1944. Which is correct? Drutt (talk) 20:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: B1 type submarine also states she was sunk by air attack. Drutt (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinking

message: Interesting article, including the info that this sub participated in the attack on Sydney Harbour in 1942. Do we have a naval researcher who can provide more detailed info than is provided in the attack article? Cheers Bjenks (talk) 14:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sydney attack 

message: I have removed the infobox photo.  That photo is actually of an earlier minelaying submarine renumbered from I-21 to I-121 when the new B Type submarine I-21 was built.  The difference is fairly obvious because the B1 Type submarines mounted the deck gun aft and had a streamlined seaplane hangar forward of the conning tower where the older submarine carried its deck gun.Thewellman (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong photo
Talk:Japanese submarine I-29

message: "Only four other submarines had attempted this trans-oceanic voyage during World War II: I-30 (April 1942), I-8 (June 1943), I-34 (October 1943) and the German submarine U-511 (August 1943). Of these, I-30 was sunk by a mine and I-34 by the British submarine Taurus. Later, the famous Japanese submarine I-52 would also share their fate."
What about U-234, en route from Germany to Japan when the war ended?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.241.240 (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only 4 attempted the voyage? 
Talk:Japanese submarine I-19

message: Some accounts state that I-40, not I-19, was sunk by Radford on 25 Nov. 1943. Do we know what became of I-40? Drutt (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I-40

message: Where are the citations for the alleged machine gunning of the men in the lifeboats? If this actually happened, then why was only one man killed? Seems to me if a submarine wanted to kill a bunch of unarmed guys in a lifeboat, it wouldn't be too hard to do. .45Colt 13:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machine gunning?
Talk:Type A1 submarine

message: I-10 is the sub that is documented in the Japanese wartime film "Gochin!" (or maybe its Go-Chin). One of the only extant submarine films (if not the only one) from the Japanese side, it has actual footage of I-10's 1943 patrol into the Indian Ocean, several sinkings (the I-10 was a successful sub, by Japanese sub standards), taking on Norwegian mercant sailors as prisoners, etc...I have a copy of this, it is terrific from a documentary standpoint.
Far as I know, the only source today for this film is the organization Sharkhunters (www.sharkhunters.com). Can this film be mentioned in this Wiki article or is that advertising for Sharkhunters (since they sell copies of the film) ? Engr105th (talk) 05:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-10 documentary
Talk:I-201-class submarine

message: There is an undeveloped duplicate page at Japanese submarine I-201, might need a merge. --68.45.218.70 (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. This is the article for the class of submarines while the other is about a specific vessel of the class. Loosmark (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The ships were captured by the US Navy, but there is nothing to indicate that any reverse engineering or copying was done, and one studies were performed. I'm changing the wording unless someone can actually provide a source on that. 2600:1700:6000:9CA0:34B7:C4D1:7E2E:617D (talk) 09:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I have already said, to do a hassle free constructive edit, we need valid individual reliable sources. If you manage to find some, then you're welcome to change accordingly. Until then, move your goal towards finding the source rather than adding anything that too is not reliable. How does that even help the article, replacing a non reliable content with another? AbhiMukh97(Speak)(Contribs) 10:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not how burden of proof works. If some user adds information with a bunch of claims, then it is the responsibility of that user, not others, to find proof. Right now you're literally justifying keeping unsourced (frankly bogus) information by making others find the source. By the way, I've searched for sources, and I also have books on US submarine development, and there is nothing to support the ridiculous notion that the US "reverse engineered" the I-201. Steve7c8 (talk) 18:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-201 class reverse engineered?