lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elmton with Creswell

message: It would be appreciated if the writer of this article, or someone who knows the history of northeast Derbyshire, to check the dates in this portion:
:"By 1984 Creswell had grown into a hamlet of 30 - 40 houses. The Midland Railway was constructed west of the hamlet in 1975 and the Beighton branch of the Lancashire, Derby and East Coast Railway was constructed a little further west in 1886/97."
Another question, did Creswell or Elmton appear in the Domesday Book or not?
This is a long article, out of proportion to the size of the place being described. Perhaps it could be pared down.--Oldontarian (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates to be checked
Talk:Elsted and Treyford

message: Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.
Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Treyford  to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 20:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I'm sure the pub doesn't lean that much... Tony Holkham (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There were times when photographers might have wanted to linger too long for an upright pic on leaving. Times change, but the pic gives a flavor of times past.SovalValtos (talk) 03:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture 

message: There are articles on Elsted and Treyford, both stubs (great cricket pic, SV), as is this article, while Hooksway is possibly notable enough for its own article (this made me laugh). Another ref to the pub here  Tony Holkham (talk) 21:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several related articles 

message: Apart from those above, a Google search found this -
*Sussex Archaeological Collections Vol 117, p.252 Roman Villa at Hooksway, Treyford
Tony Holkham (talk) 22:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Another which establishes the charming full name; 'Treyford cum Dibling' is http://www.parish-council.com/ElstedandTreyford/ SovalValtos (talk) 03:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Privacy. WP:BLPNAME is a reasonable guide. Just commonsense really.SovalValtos (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 
Talk:Elstow

message: I am removing the reference to vipauk.org  by . It appears that this website copied multiple Wikipedia articles, and that their page concerning Moot Hall (see earliest archived version from 2020 here) is taken from .
It bears mentioning that this content, , is largely unreferenced and itself may represent plagiarized or original work, and should be sourced to improve its verifiability. Ibadibam (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I have remove all the unreferenced material on the Moot Hall from this article and drafted a new article, using a diverse range of sources, at Moot Hall, Elstow. Dormskirk (talk) 17:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged plagiarism
Talk:Elsyng Palace

message: The simple reason is that this is part of Forty Hall. 
Btw, another thing to be sorted out is the Elsyng palace needs the P capitalised, if that is its name. Simply south (talk) 12:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the merge, Forty Hall doesn't seem like it should be able to stand on its own. And I sorted the capitalising the P —αlεx•mullεr 13:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I think I meant Elsyng Palace shouldn't be able to stand on its own. In any case, it just strikes me that they're about such similar things (what essentially comes down to two buildings on the same plot of land) that they shouldn't have an article each. Though I do see your point about it being a Grade 1 listed building, Pterre. —αlεx•mullεr 19:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the info from the sources provided, Forty Hall was part of the Elsyng estate (or built on) including the gardens. Maybe reverse? Also, I am not saying that either one are non-notable. I was suggesting it as both were short and part of the same history and once expanded they could be split again. Forty Hall could be part of the Elsyng Palace article. Simply south (talk) 21:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with that. I'm planning to expand Forty Hall quite soon; I hope to get a decent photo on Friday, weather permitting, my only existing ones are against the sun - alternatively there are several fine but rather low res ones on geograph. If there is a merge I vote to make Elsyng a section in the history of Forty Hall rather than vice versa; it does not really make sense to make an extant and (in north London at least) well-known public building a footnote in the history of a long demolished and (outside archaeological circles) long-forgotten one. Pterre (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Elton, County Durham

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=42626, http://www.britishlistedbuildings.co.uk/england/durham/elton. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  January (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Embleton, Northumberland

message: Someone from Embleton pointed out to me that the view given in the Creighton quote is hardly contemporary and of questionable relevance to the village now, being a description of how he found it about 130 years ago. In Creighton's own article, his time in Embleton is described more fully and in a more balanced way; his concern at the morals is balanced by him also saying it was the best ten years of his life. That seems to me to be more the proper place for that discussion, and gives it room to breathe; here it is shoehorned awkwardly into a section which is supposed to be about "Religious sites", not about what one incumbent at one religious site thought about the population at one time. I'm quite tempted to remove the whole Creighton's-view thing, and resolve instead to add more content of contemporary relevance. But what do you think? cheers DBaK (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't all shout at once. DBaK (talk) 10:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is an interested historical tidbit.  Of course, it's as much a comment on Creighton's view of social norms as it is a comment on Embleton.  Let's keep it in.  Disclosure: I lived in Embleton for 18 years. cffk (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks very much  for the reply. In view of that, and having had a year or two to consider it, I think I'd like not so much to remove it, then, as to rewrite and/or restructure to give it a bit more context, to balance it with the nicer things Creighton said about Embleton, and so on. When or even whether I'll get round to this is another question. I'm interested to hear that you lived there; I have connections there too but that's probably better discussed by email or something, not here. You almost certainly knew the "someone from Embleton" referred to at the start of this section, for instance. Cheers DBaK (talk) 21:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

text: This sounds like a good plan.  My years in Embleton were 1954-1972 (and I have only visited Embleton 3-4 times since then); this may govern whether or not we have an acquaintance in common. cffk (talk) 21:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good grief, , you're even older than me! Yes, we still probably dojust not the one I was originally thinking of! :) Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creighton's view
Talk:Endon

message: There is little in the way of references for many of the claims here though I know from my own experience and local knowledge that there is little here that is erroneous, hence not deleting it for the moment. It needs sorting. I will fix some of this as and when I can but any help would be appreciated Jclaxp talk 12:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations and Sources
Talk:England national under-17 football team

message: The table in section 3.1, the current squad, could do with a column for players' squad numbers, I think. But I can't find them on the internet anywhere. Is there someone in India (or with a better Googley than mine) who could add it? Nick Barnett (talk) 22:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squad numbers
Talk:England national under-18 football team

message: Most of these players are listed as 19/20 years of age.
-Luke  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.192.104 (talk) 22:16, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under 18? 
Talk:Tribe (Native American)

message: What are the criteria which each federally recognized tribe has for membership? I haven't seen this anywhere. kencf0618 (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There's 573 tribes in the United States, each with their own distinct criteria. Blood_quantum_laws#Implementation at least touches on the aspect of minimum blood-quantum requirements for tribal enrollment. Yuchitown (talk) 01:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership/Citizenship criteria
File talk:Iberian Peninsula antique map.jpg

message: This is surprisingly cartographically accurate. Can anyone explain how in the 18th century they were able to make maps that were as accurate-looking as this?--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The same way they built the pyramids. The aliens helped them. -- Chris.B • talk 19:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that you mention it Chris, it's so obvious! --Gibmetal 77talk 14:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Epworth, Lincolnshire

message: Epworth Show has been unreferenced and tagged for notability for 5 years. It doesn't seem independently notable, but definitely worth inclusion in the article on the town. Boleyn (talk) 09:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 21:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[Epworth Show]] to [[Epworth, Lincolnshire]] 
Talk:Eridge

message: In accordance with  the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements, one of the recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements within a civil parish should be in one article. Hence the proposal. 
There are also some errors in the article:
* an ecclesiastical parish cannot be formed out of a civil parish - two different things; and in any case the latter didn't come into being until 1894
* there are a great many links which should have been picked up 
*the Villagenet ref cannot be accessed - I guess they got fed up with having so many people copyvioing to Wiki!
 
I have transferred the information, where it isn't already included, to the Rotherfield article Peter Shearan (talk) 06:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposals
Talk:Ernie Bond (footballer)

message: Met and spoke with Ernie Bond in Lytham St. Anne’s today 26th June 2023.  He had tales to tell and it was wonderful to listen. Still lives in Preston.
A wonderful 30 minutes.
https://www.where-are-they-now.co.uk/footballer/Bond+Ernie/16036 has comments stating that he is still alive and living in Lancashire. Skycloud86 (talk) 14:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified comments stating he is alive as of 2021
Talk:Credit Valley Hospital

message: He103.151.42.78 (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Hostage taking, has been going on at Credit Valley Hospital since 9:00 AM, Friday September 30'Th, 2022. https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-tensions-high-as-person-barricaded-near-mississauga-hospital?fbclid=IwAR1I2PwoQe9_-qMW1JS0UUTY7t7ZMFY1j_bx3bOhIWdCME9lI9iSn1cwxe0--Splashen (talk) 01:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Breaking!!!!
Talk:Erwarton

message: *Agree that Shop Corner content should be copied here. 
Sjhnumber1 (talk) 05:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Shop Corner 
Talk:A836 road

message: The style of this article is not in keeping with other road (or indeed Wikipedia) articles. Where major road articles have a junction list it should be in table form but the a836 is not a significant enough road to justify that so I propose to delete the majority of it and incorporate the salient points into a route section. In particular there is too much information about the roads linking away from the a836 which should be confined to those articles. If there are no objections, and when time permits!! Anyone else gets there first, be welcome... Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 22:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed thin-down
Talk:A846 road

message: This is a fairly rare situation in the UK that a road is designated with part of the road including a ferry crossing. I have referenced the length at 47.6 miles, the reference actually states 48.3 miles but 0.7 miles of this is on water by boat, my interpretation is that as a road we are concerned with the length of driveable tarmac, not "virtual" sections on water. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 23:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Length
Talk:A94 road

message: The article states: The A94 is a major trunk route in Scotland. Why does the article display a black-on-white sign? Unless I'm mixing primary and trunk up the A94 sign should be yellow on green. The Master of Mayhem   (t  c) 18:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears on Google maps as non-primary. Trunk is an old definition which, to my understanding, is no longer used; it is replaced by Strategic Road Network and Primary Route Network. I will remove the word "trunk".Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 16:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone got confused here...
Talk:A98 road

message: The A98 sign on this page is green and gold, as in primary. The A98 is not primary (hasn't been since 2000) and needs changing to a black text on white background one. I don't have the original image to do this myself. Matt-thepie (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A98 sign image / Primary status
Talk:A99 road

message: They keep on filling them with dead links. Either write about them or don't link them. Seeing red everywhere makes me... well see red! Alan16 (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The people who write these local things... 
Talk:Sunshine Mine

message: These links have been tagged as of concern since 2012. None of them appear to meet the requirements at WP:EL, failing WP:ELNO#1 at least. However, they may be of use to editors wishing to work on the article so they have been moved here. If, after examination, a link is found not to be useful it can be removed from this list. If the link does prove useful, appropriate information can be summarised in the article, using the link as a reliable source if it meets the WP:RELIABLE criteria, and then the link can be removed from this list. Be aware that, per WP:ELBURDEN, none of these links should be returned to the article without first gaining consensus. SilkTork (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: External links
Talk:Air traffic service

message: This article lists the functions of air traffic control and not much more - would it be worth merging with the air traffic control and listing the services of the Air traffic service within the article? Just thought I'd get others views before adding a banner to the article. Also, the only organisation that I can find that provides an ATS is NATS Holdings of the UK, which has it's own wikipedia article. There is also not much relevent or referenced information in this (Air Traffic Service) article. Hjay50 (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As a merge has not been agreed, I suggest thaty we now try to expand this article.  In the UK there are several levels of air traffic service with air traffic control being one of them.  Is this the same in other countries?  if not, maybe we should move this article to 'air traffic service in the UK'. Martin Hogbin (talk) 07:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Air Traffic Control? 

message: I can find no evidence for the use of this term in relation to air traffic and I have never heard it used.   Do we have a source??  If not, I will remove it. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra-ventricular??
Talk:Aircraft on ground

message: Much of this article appears to be copied directly from http://www.nglog.com/resources/blog/aog-aircraft-ground-shippers-what-look-partner.  It's not entirely clear in which direction the copying happened.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since that blog is dated 13 April 2012 and the content was largely changed to that phrasing on 21 September 2008 my money's on it being copied from here. I'm not finding any other source that verifiably predates the article. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: the link to the Boeing site is broken Fakeoren levi (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link
Talk:Area navigation

message: What does the line
:MNPS : MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECS
mean or have anything to do with the article?  Can it be removed?
CyclonePredator (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Template talk:Burgundian Circle

message: Guelders is listed as "Remained" but since 3 out of 4 quarters of Guelders seceded and Guelders was one of the seven provinces refered to in the name "Republic of the Seven United Provinces" this choice seems somewhat dubious. Especially when considered with Zutphen, which was one of the quarters of Guelders, being on the list of "Seceded".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quendorsof (talk • contribs) 19:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that Guelders should be in the "Seceded" list. – Editør (talk) 10:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position of Guelders in the Template
Talk:Chandelle

message: Anyone else find it strange that the article first says that the Chandelle is not a dogfighting maneuver, then further down describes how it was used in air combat? Is it the modern-day Chandelle, the one used for pilot certification, which is not a combat maneuver? Or was even that maneuver actually used in air combat? --Avl (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

message: Would someone mind making sure the animation loops repeatedly? Going through the sequence once isn't quite that useful. 173.21.247.63 (talk) 19:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animation 

message: If the Chandelle is "now required for attaining a commercial flight certificate in many countries" - not just some, why add "The Federal Aviation Administration in the United States requires such training"? The article might as well read "The Aviation Administration in Kazakhstan requires such training". To name one country adds nothing to the paragraph.101.98.74.13 (talk) 05:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Required training 

message: A Chandelle is a maneuver to lose many thousands of feet per minute without building up airspeed or causing a stall.  It's basically a no-power, turning slip used to get on the ground quickly.  I was taught this maneuver by a WWII pilot for the purpose of rapidly decreasing altitude, for example, in the event of an engine fire.  Perhaps both definitions are correct. Charles Juvon (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I disagree
Talk:Disk loading

message: In "Bernoulli's principle", variables p1 and p2 need to be defined.
In "Momentum theory", there should be an explanation of how the air
velocity far downstream can be twice the velocity at the disk, which
is quite counterintuitive (why does it speed up?).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.200.91 (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems in "Theory" section 

message: We have an illustration of MV-22 Osprey titled simply 'Disk loading.' The caption reads 'The MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor has a relatively high disk loading, producing visible blade tip vortices from condensation of the marine air in this photo of a vertical takeoff.' It needs a bit of rewording. The MV-22 disk loading is comparatively high for rotorcraft, when tilted vertically and operating as a rotorcraft, but is comparatively low for airplanes, when tilted horizontally and operating as an airplane. Fnj2 (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption to illustration titled 'Disk loading' 
Talk:High-speed flight

message: Isn't there a hell of a lot more to high speed flight than just compressibility? Why didn't you just call the page "Compressibility (aviation)? "Compressibility in aircraft"? What about shock waves, wave drag, center-of-gravity changes, friction heating, engine efficiency, supersonic intake design? What IS "high-speed-flight"? Is it transonic, as suggested in this article, or is it Mach 7 in an X-15? I don't understand this at all. This is the only page on Wikipedia that appears to be about compressibility at all, and it's called "high-speed-flight", for some baffling reason..45Colt 07:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is the WHOLE article on "high-speed flight"?
Talk:Lixa

message: Lixa, es un rapero ecuatoriano, nacido en 1985 El COCA - EC, en 1999 comenzo en el movimiento HIPHOP  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.66.89.242 (talk) 16:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Integrated engine pressure ratio

message: Why does Engine Pressue Ratio a.k.a. EPR (a performance measurement method common to almost all gas-turbine engines) redirect to Integrated Engine Pressue Ratio a.k.a. IEPR (a unique case, currently only used with one gas-turbine engine model)??? IMO, this is exactly backwards. EPR should be the main article, containing the IEPR info as a subsection, and IEPR should redir to EPR. Also, the IEPR article title at the time I'm writing this is mis-formatted in title case (first letter of each word capitalized) rather than sentence case (only the first letter of the first word capitalized; the correct Wikipedia article title convention). 96.251.70.114 (talk) 07:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done just that, you're absolutely right in my opinion. — Julian H.✈ (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  IEPR and EPR
Talk:Jump seat

message: Should there be something here about FedEx Flight 705? Auburn Calloway was in the jumpseat on this flight (before he tried to kill the pilots and crash the plane)?  --94.195.20.3 (talk) 14:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

message: Why are there pictures of cars under the aviation header? Raptortech97 (talk) 13:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cars in aviation section 
Talk:Kern Bridge

message: This recent article about the bridge uses the spelling "Jaeger" rather than "Yaeger" but apparently a family by that name lived on a farm next to it. Jonathunder (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaeger or Yaeger
Talk:Brandoa

message: Perhaps it would be more informative to put the flags at the bottom of the infobox. --Emesee (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  moving the flags in the info box 