Talk:Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards

message: Need to cite the WCCAs? Here you go! Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 11:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Handy Citations 

message: I wanted to point this out: any comic that has won an award from the WCCA is considered notable as per the current version of WP:WEB (this is unlikely to change). So every comic here should have an article on Wiki. Xuanwu 08:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, which is why I have been trying to list all of the recipients. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 16:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: How are the Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards notable? --Simonkoldyk 17:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As for third party reputable sources, it has been featured on G4 techTV's Atack of the Show in August, 2005 and also in a New York Times article on digital comics 17 August, 2005. Epameinondas 11:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to the article as it exists now.  We've got some tail-swallowing here: The web content guideline says that an award must be notable, so unless some meat is added to this article, quite a few of these comics which have no other claim to satisfying the critera look vulnerable. - 152.91.9.144 23:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another point is that several "notable" webcomics (such as VG Cats) have made presentation comics specifically for WCCA to use. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.43.105.22 (talk) 11:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 

message: This section was blanked and brought back recently. I didn't remove it, but I am of the opinion that the article might be better off without it... It seems like NPOV and OR concerns seems concentrated in this section. Can we do without it? -- Ben (talk) 06:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some  tags to it. If we can't source it, then the section should be edited accordingly. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just cut quite a bit of unsourced controversy, arguments, etc. -- Dragonfiend 06:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I was one of the people to remove unsourced segments - if we can find some reputable sources for the controversy, then we can bring them back, but good luck trying to find an internal webcomic debate outside of the forums and blogs. The controversy exists, but it's entirely online, making a rather unfortunate barrier. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.138.44.202 (talk) 06:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section 

message: Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards this page is to be deleted.  However my recalcitrant broswer means that it's now in  status for the time being. - brenneman 05:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just having article on an award doesn't warrant it to have a category for it. bogdan 18:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps true. But is there any particular reason not to have a category for this award? The CfD's conclusion was based entirely on the fact of this article's deletion, which now appears to have been invalid. Bryan Derksen 00:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: 2007 Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards wasn't undeleted, so I put it up for WP:DRV here. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another DRV 

message: Has a story on the deletion snit -> http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/31/0328239
WiccaWeb 15:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slashdot 

message: It would be nice if you had _something_ nice to say about the web cartoonist's choice awards.  These are after all the most famous awards for webcomics.  It's a bit ridiculous that almost the entire article consists of people whining about them. - 136.159.61.31 23:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something positive 

message: #
#
#
Cirt (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: Article says "although in 2007 a live presentation is being made for the first time at MegaCon." Did the presentation happen? --EarthFurst (talk) 23:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  live presentation 

message: FWIW, somehow the log history of this article has become fragmented, possibly due to the move: 2007-01-29 to 2008-02-03 here with 2005-09-18 and 2007-01-29 here. -84user (talk) 02:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Log history fragmentation 

message: I just Google Scholar searched for "Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards" and found Graphic Novels and Comics in Libraries and Archives: Essays on Readers, Research, History and Cataloging. Chapter 25 also mentions these tools for librarians: Eric Burns, Websnark, Comixtalk, Fleen, Kidjutsu and the Eisner Awards. Here is a  template usable for other articles.
-84user (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible notability in Webcomics and Libraries 

message: Notwithstanding the previous talk page threads and deletion discussions, what are the indicia of notability for this award? The NYT mention is not significant or in depth. The reference in the Robert G. Weiner book is barely even a passing mention. So what references give rise to notability? Bongomatic 04:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: So this was a set of "awards" (no actual awards of any kind?) given out by members of a forum, and the article continues to exist by dint of voting in defiance of policy and accusing people of being "racist against webcomics"? 92.25.58.165 (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non existant