lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Francis William Drake

message: It looks to me like there is some confusion between this Drake and his younger brother - read the DoCB article to see what I'm talking about... Fawcett5 15:03, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be able to point out the discrepancy? With so many Francis Drakes it's totally confusing!  The article is meant to be about the individual who was governor of Newfoundland from 1750 to 1752.  Some of the reference material I had used was a combination of three sources, two of them are listed as external links (which BTW is about the same individual) and the third which is not electronic, it is The Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador. HJKeats 19:01, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Samuel DiPiazza

message: I have e-mailed PwC to get permission but still have not received a response Biz 15:06, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carotid endarterectomy

message: *Drepanopulos:
I'm a resident in vascular surgery in Paris,France ,so I summed up how CEA is REALLY done
:Thank you. As no other vascular surgeons had shown an interest in creating this article, this completely unsurgical doctor who has never witnessed an endarterectomy felt compelled to write it. Thanks for correcting my mistakes and rephrasing the contraindications. JFW | T@lk 16:47, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia paradox is that, if you really know about something, because you have first-hand experience and training, you're not supposed to write about it because it violates WP:NOR. However, I won't tell anybody. Nbauman (talk) 07:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  You can write about something you really know about without it being your original research. CEA has been done for 40 years.  Also, @Drepanopulos, there is substantial variation across geographic regions and across specialties in the technique of CEA. BakerStMD T|C 18:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

message: After the description of the CEA procedure, there is a substantial section on stenting. This properly belongs under a separate article.Bakerstmd (talk) 02:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carotid Stenting 

message: Intro currently too long and not friendly to a lay audience. Should be shortened per standards for procedures and operations. BakerStMD 15:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Shorten Intro
Talk:L(R)

message: I added a dispute tag so that no one is accidentally misled by the page (as I briefly was).  Statements that depend on large cardinal hypotheses cannot be described as "facts".  The page should be rewritten to make clear which statements depend on large cardinal hypotheses, and which that don't.  I would do it, but I'm not familiar enough with the material. -- Walt Pohl 15:41, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the dependency on large cardinals to the section header. Hopefully that should take care of it. --Trovatore 17:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I found the following passage, which contains an incomplete sentence, and removed it
for now:
: The purpose of L(R) is to study properties of sets that are constructible without recourse to the axiom of choice.  Most properties of 
I'm not sure I agree that that's the "purpose" of L(R). It's true that sets in L(R) have a certain definability property and that AC fails in L(R) (given large cardinals, of course).  But I see it more as the smallest natural model of AD.  I am curious to know what was coming after "most properties of...". --Trovatore 19:43, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete thought

message: Is it really necessary to assume large cardinals to show that projective sets are in L(R)? I would have thought it immediate. Ben Standeven 22:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, of course it's not oops, that could be misread--I mean "of course, it's not necessary". Yes, it is immediate.  What I wanted to present in that section is what L(R) really looks like; originally I had the section titled just "Facts about L(R)", and mentioned in the text that the existence of large cardinals was assumed. Someone objected to that. I don't see any good reason to separate out what does and doesn't depend on large cardinals; the point is that there's a unitary coherent picture of what L(R) looks like, but you need large cardinals to prove some of it. --Trovatore 23:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Projective sets

message: Does it matter what exactly R is in terms of sets before we throw it into the machinery? 
When it comes to algebraic properties and ordering properties it really doesen't matter wether the reals is a bag of bunches of bananas or something else.
Any two sets of reals composed of whatever are (uniquely) isomorphic when it comes to the usual properties. But say that we have some sanity requirements, 
like that any real must be an element of the von Neumann universe V. Can we take any R \subset V passing as a set of reals and then proceed? YohanN7 (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of R
Talk:Red-figure pottery

message: I have extended this article, mostly by translating the counterpart from German wikipedia. The previous commentator is rigght as regards "burned". "Fired" is the word normally used. His or her reference to terra sigillata is not correct. That term described a type of Roman mould-made pottery and is entirely unconnected to Greek red-figure vase painting. 
There are currently a lot of redlinks in the article. I will try and start articles for as many of them as I can in the near future.   
It would be useful if someone could replace the references from Boardman, here gicing page numbers in the German translation, with those from the original English. The DNP references should stay as they are, as that source, albeit in German, is one of the main key reference works internationally. 
athinaios (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extension
Talk:M. P. Paul

message: Have heard many stories about Paul and fellow lecturers at St. thomas college, but can't really remember them exactly..  help, anyone? 
i don't think I have read basheer's memoir about paul
--Pournami 15:47, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alraune

message: I just wanted to note that the Alraune is a monster in Pathfinder Roleplaying Game.
Here is a link to its description on the archives of nethys: https://www.aonprd.com/MonsterDisplay.aspx?ItemName=Alraune 128.240.225.5 (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathfinder
Talk:Cha-La Head-Cha-La

message: Isn't the actual spelling へっちゃら ? --Backinstadiums (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  へっちゃら
Talk:List of people from Arizona

message: I'm changing his title on the list to "Maricopa County Sheriff".  As he is a rather controversial figure, the current title could be seen as an endorsement of Arpaio.  Panchitavilletalk 06:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Joe Arpaio]]

message: I removed bands, since this is a list of individuals from Arizona, and there is already a band page. I changed some of the headings, and I beg someone to come up with a better title for "Old West Era," as it's the best I can do! Parsssseltongue 22:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Editors... please make sure to adhere to alpahbetical order when adding new individuals. PT (s-s-s-s) 18:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetical order

message: Would someone please add Cesar Chavez.  This list s an utter and complete joke without him. 98.113.8.185 (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arizona's Most Famous Son is missing from this list
Talk:Star Academy

message: In the template 'Star Academy around the world', you've missed to put the name of the region of - The West Balkans which includes Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Montenegro and Macedonia, for the best ever show there - 'Operacija Trijumf'. Cheers.24.86.116.250 (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Balkans region and 'Operacija Trijumf' 

message: Here's my predictions for countries that have yet to launch Star Academy/Operation Triumph:
Region	Local name
      	Triumfi i Operacionit
      	Գանաչում ակադեմիաChanach’um akademia
      	Star Academy
      	Əməliyyat zəfəri
      	Аперацыя ТрыюмфApieracyja Tryjumf
      	Star Academy
      	Star Academy – 胜利行动Star Academy – Shènglì xíngdòng
      	Star Academy Hrvatska
      	Star Academy Česko Slovenska
      	Fame Factory Danmark
      	Fame Factory Suomi
      	スターアカデミーSutāakademī
      	Fame Factory Ísland
      	Star Academy Indonesia
      	Fame Academy Ireland
      	Star Academy Israel
      	Akademiya Stêrk
      	Operacija triumfuoja
      	Star Academy Malaysia
      	Star Academy NZ
      	Star Academy Nepal
      	Fame Factory Norge
      	Star Academy Nigeria
      	Star Academy Pakistan
      	Operacja triumfuje
      	Zvezda Akademija
      	Star Academy
      	스타 아카데미Seuta akademi
      	Fame Academy Thailand
      	Star Academy
What countries do you want to launch Star Academy/Operation Triumph? 173.59.126.236 (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predictions for more countries to launch Star Academy?
Talk:Giuga number

message: The German Wikipedia seems to have some excellent details on the topic. But since I don't speak German, I would feel more comfortable if the user making changes to the English version based on the German version was a logged-in user of both Wikipedias. PrimeFan 16:16, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Could somebody please explain what a Giuga number is in terms us non-mathematicians can understand?  The article as is is totally incomprehensible to me. Nibios (talk) 13:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, what is a Giuga number? 
Talk:Westcor

message: At least two of the articles on individual properties listed in this article were deleted by an administrator citing a belief that they served more as directory listings, and were placed on Wikipedia as spam, rather than being legitimate articles of notable merit. I posted a complaint on the deletion review page. I am strongly inclined to post replacement articles. Shopping centers, in my opinion, are notable as per official guidelines for notability (WP:NOTE) and deserve coverage on Wikipedia. 
It is generally known, by laypeople and scholars alike, that shopping centers are places of strong social, cultural and economic significance, especially in the USA. In the case of the Westcor properties, these malls are the economic engine that literally provides life or "death" to whole neighborhoods and communities. Neighborhoods in Arizona, as well as much of the Western United States as a whole, thrive or decline based on the health, or lack thereof, of their malls; such an critically important social phenomenon alone justifies the relevance - and unbiased inclusion - of such articles on Wikipedia.
Many "multiple non-trivial published works" are generated on a regualr basis through the news media to document historical and timely news developments concerning these malls. All of them can, and have been used in several cases, as reference material for these articles.--Msr69er 04:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute on notability of Westcor properties

message: The list of properties needs to be checked and verified.
I know for a fact that the "MetroCenter: Phoenix" listing is WRONG.
I live 1/2 a mile away from MetroCenter and it has not been owned by either Westcor nor Macerich for years!
So, please check, verify, and update.2600:8800:50B:6700:C23F:D5FF:FEC5:89B6 (talk) 21:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verify properties
Talk:Mixed boundary condition

message: This is my first article on wikipedia.  I basically just used some of the information from the dirichlet and neumann b.c. articles along with some class notes to flesh it out.  
I don't think I've done anything bad here but please let me know if I have.
158.130.15.109 16:19, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ashley Smith (author)

message: I'm redirecting this back to The_Purpose_Driven_Life#Ashley_Smith, as the only reason it was un-redirected was because the PDR article had its information about Smith blanked from the page. The reason the other article lacked this information about her is because someone decided that she was not pertinent to the article about the book. It was probably done with good will, but her capture and detainment was ultimately what made the book as notable as it became. While the capture event is what initially started all of this, most people predominantly know of her in relation to the Purpose Driven Life. They know she was captured and held prisoner, but most aren't really all that aware of Nichols whereas most associate her with PDR. There is also more about her in the PDR article as there's more freedom to elaborate on what she's done since then. That article links to Nichols, so should work well flow-wise.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting to [[The_Purpose_Driven_Life#Ashley_Smith]]
Talk:Crown Court

message: Diagram added Egmason (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To be included in article?  - nb this needs checking.  Morwen - Talk 16:25, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Crown Court locations

message: Thought i would add a little note about solicitor advoactes, who now also have rights of audicance in crown courts.
86.29.19.99 03:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solicitor Advocates 

message: Hi there, did this a while back, just wanted to add to the section about the physical layout, concerning the role of the court reporter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.110.248.146 (talk) 13:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Court Reporter

message: Not sure whether the "Physical layout" section is necessary, as there is a lot of variation between courts, and the section includes details about function as well as layout. A photograph would probably be all that is required, or maybe a short passage about the style and a bit about layout with regard to function.--Sakrotac (talk) 15:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Physical layout necessary?

message: The table at the end of the article is incomplete, missing such counties as Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire. Some explanation of the current circuits would be good too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.161.66 (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Counties

message: Why is "Crown Court" capitalised, but "magistrates court" is not? I like consistency unless there's a good reason. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case
File talk:Tomleonard.jpg

message: (moved from User talk:ChrisRuvolo)
I own the picture 
 --PalX 12:49, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Do you own a print of the photograph?  Or do you own the copyright to the original?  What year was it taken?  You would have to be the original photographer, or perhaps the inheritor of the original photographer to own the copyright.  Under what license terms do you want to provide the photograph to Wikipedia?  See Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to select a free license.  Thanks.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:02, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't answer any questions except what license you would like to have it under.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:56, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Thank you for the clarification and your contribution.  I'm changing the image page accordingly and placing a copy of this discussion on the image's talk page.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:30, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Licensing/Copyright
Talk:Sonorant

message: The page says that "a sound is sonorant if it can be voiced continuously at the same pitch." But it also lists taps as sonorants. How can a tap be voiced continuously? I don't think this makes sense.
Fricatives can also be voiced continuously at the same pitch, and are important to exclude from sonorants. It looks like Dog.o.matic's "more accessible definition" is simply false. I'll try to fix it, but I'm not so good with "accessible", so this is a stopgap. 76.88.68.174 (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, I wasn't logged in. Darekun (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The class of sounds that description is referring to is continuants. --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 21:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a tap really a sonorant? 

message: Are the nasal consonants /m/ and /n/ sonorants or stops?  I have two conflicting answers from two pages: Sonorant and Nasal consonants.LakeKayak (talk) 22:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nasal stops are not the same as oral stops. The former can be elongated (as long as physically possible), but in the case of the latter you can only delay their release (see e.g. Italian) or quickly re-articulate them. This seems to agree with the lead of his article. I see no conflict. You could say that nasal stops sound like strongly articulated approximants (which are sonorants). Mr KEBAB (talk) 15:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was only confused.  Thanks for clearing me up.LakeKayak (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting information 

message: Words beginning with "wh" in English, such as  "whence", "whither", "where", used to be pronounced with a soft start sounding a bit like "hw" in which the "h" is almost an unvoiced short blow of air. Would "wh" in that case be a voiceless sonorant? Bermicourt (talk) 08:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voiceless sonorants in English?
Talk:General of the Army (United States)

message: In one of the pictures of this page appears the shoulder strap insignia ordered by William Sherman in 1872 with the coat of arms of the United States between two stars. Below the image it writes that it was used only by Sherman and was in use between 1872-1888. That's not correct, it was used until 1917. 
1. The source quoted at note 3 by the author is 'US Army Five Star Generals - Frequently Asked Questions' of the U.S. Army Center of Military History. Consulting that source, I could read: 'War Department General Orders No. 75, September 5, 1866, prescribed that the insignia for the newly authorized General of the Army grade would be four stars. General Grant wore this insignia, as did General Sherman until War Department General Orders No. 92, October 26, 1872, changed the insignia to two silver stars with the arms of the United States in gold between them. General Sherman, and later General Sheridan, wore the new insignia.'
2. In the 'US Army Facts and Insignia' (5th Edition revised) Major Lucius A. Hine (editor) Rand McNally & Co, Chicago & New York, page 17, are pictured both styles of rank insignia for the grade of General: The one introduced by Sherman in 1872 which was in use until 1917 and the new one (in fact the old one, between 1866-1872) with 4 silver stars. The document clearly states that the "with the appointment of Generals Pershing and Bliss to the rank of full general in 1917, the change in holder insignia as indicated above was introduced...four stars are silver and of equal size". 
3. A picture from the 'Chicago Daily News War Book' from 1917 has a picture  (at page 9) where the same difference is marked by showing two shoulder boards - old style (coat of Arms between two stars) and new style (4 silver stars of equal size) Radu Urloiu (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insignia of Rank 

message: I see references for the creation of the rank, but I don't see where the insignia is authorized. I'm not challenging it since the US Army lists it on the official site and shows a 5 star insignia, but it would be nice to see where it's actually codified. Sephiroth storm (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the insignia made official? 

message: Mini Militia Double army 175.176.68.240 (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini Militia Double army 

message: Wouldnt this be inaccurate if another person was also given this title, unlikely as it may be? 2605:A601:AFC3:700:85D5:26BB:7A68:4FC2 (talk) 01:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything "is" until it "isn't". The point is, right now GW is considered the most senior, and it's intended to remain that way. If, for some reason that were to change, then it would be documented here, along with reliable sourcing in support, (though I can't imagine that ever occurring, either his seniority being revoked or another Gen. being put above him). - wolf 07:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thus, Washington will always be the most senior general of the United States.
Talk:Parker, Colorado

message: Current (2005) population is taken from city website. -EDM 17:09, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One of my teachers is moving to parker she is my lit. teacher i think she will have a good time there and im sad that she has to move.  The reason she is moving to Parker is because she is getting married and the guy she is marrying is getting a job in Parker I hope she has a good time in Colorado she teaches 6th grade literature. by by —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.26.185.145 (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting fact  

message: Need a few photos for Class BLanceBarber (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Parker just got done hosting the senior PGA tour. Pretty big event if you ask me. Maybe someone can edit into the page a section on the Colorado Golf Club? 76.25.239.178 (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senior PGA Tour 

message: Parker has been around for a while.  This article needs at least a paragraph or two on the towns history.  --Footwarrior (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the History Section?

message: Some maps are here:
* Town boundary map: http://www.parkeronline.org/DocumentCenter/View/10304 - http://www.webcitation.org/6XRmXMefi
* Zoning map: http://www.parkeronline.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/166 - http://www.webcitation.org/6XRmZaJ05
* Facilities map: http://www.parkeronline.org/DocumentCenter/View/229 - http://www.webcitation.org/6XRmfJh9b
* Open space map: http://www.parkeronline.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/169 - http://www.webcitation.org/6XRmikW6k
* Parks and trails map: http://www.parkeronline.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/59 - http://www.webcitation.org/6XRmm4dwy
* Downtown public parking map: http://www.parkeronline.org/DocumentCenter/View/21886 - http://www.webcitation.org/6XRmpbFY2
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps 
Talk:NZ Touring Cars Championship

message: This article doesn't really tell me what the New Zealand Tour Cars are or give me any useful information - "This series somewhat resembles but differs in many ways from the Australian V8 Supercars" What is that supposed to mean? I tried to find some information on the net about this topic but was unable to find anything useful. I vote to delete this page. --Jeff 17:17, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given that the New Zealand Touring Car Championship was clearly a separate title to the NZ V8 Championship, I propose to move the NZTCC winners list to a separate “New Zealand Touring Car Championship” page. GTHO (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Zealand Touring Car Championship 

message: V8 Supertourers collapsed mid-way through last season. How can it be called a merger when one side no longer exists? Surely this is just a series name change. --Falcadore (talk) 10:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: V8 Super Tourers were in liquidation in March. There was nothing for NZV8s to merge with. --Falcadore (talk) 10:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request
Talk:Chicken Lady

message: --Angr/ 17:23, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I've removed this section. A catch phrase is, according to Wikipedia, "a phrase or expression recognized by its repeated utterance" (my italics). As the lines listed were only used once or twice and mainly in a single sketch, they don't meet this definition  ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Catch phrases"