Talk:Abelisauridae

message: Any particular reason that this article is getting loads of edits at the moment? It's great, of course, but just wondering if I'd missed some big collaboration drive or something. Or maybe it's just my imagination. Soo 21:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I updated Abelisaurus and then decided to update Abelisauridae too. Since then people have been copyediting it... no organized thing or anything though. Any suggestions? Sheep81 21:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any particular reason... 

message: You know, someone could make this a GA if they wanted to, without too much difficulty. J. Spencer 05:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just nominated it. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 09:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  With a little work 

message: I note that the the corrections that were required, have been carried, and I note too, the reasons for not carrying out some of the corrections. I do not regard those required corrections as being material. Therefore, I am pleased to announce that the article has achieved GA Status.
Congratulations,
Tovojolo (talk) 22:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Status

message: Is the timeline at the end of the article supposed to be like the one on the Tyrannosauridae page, where it displays the time period in which each fossil genus existed, or is it supposed to be a timeline of when each fossil genus was first discovered/named? The former seems to me more useful, and would follow the precedent set in Tyrannosauridae. Perhaps someone with some more familiarity with the material can add a sentence or two of introduction to the timeline to clear this up. Reade (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: :
Yeah, like the word horsemen indicates a plural noun.  The ai is a nominative plural ending, but the id has a meaning independent of number, probably ‘descendant’. —Tamfang (talk) 20:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  -idae 

message: . . .  comes from The Winter (Neuquen, Argentina) rocks of Bajo de la Carpa Formation. The excellent preservation and meaningful information were provided ... to advance knowledge of this group of theropods, the abelisaurs. Viavenator ( "hunter's way") exxoni.  Looks like a little over 4 meters. Unfortunately, the skull was not preserved.68.19.8.105 (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  new one from Argentina ..... 

message: I removed the mention of Ceratosauridae as a possible subtaxon within Abelisauridae, but have reverted that change as premature as I see that there is a reference to go with it. The fellow who added that information listed a reference for  in the edit comment. I wasn't able to add this reference to the page where it belongs, but hope that someone else can. 209.136.39.130 (talk) 17:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceratosauridae in Abelisauridae 

message: Was this (large) species from N. Africa ever formally described and named?  It would be a good addition for the article if there are sources. 50.111.57.100 (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moroccan Kem-Kem bed albelisaur ... 

message: see -->  https://scitechdaily.com/the-one-who-causes-fear-extremely-powerful-new-meat-eating-predator-discovered/  <-- it should be listed somewhere - also, is there any firm data on its size at this point? 104.169.24.168 (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already listed at Furileusauria, a subgroup within the Carnotaurinae. As for size, I'm not really very aware of the genus. JurassicClassic767 (talk | contribs) 19:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  where does this one fit