lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Morgan Aero 8

message: Does anyone know what engine is used in the Morgan Aero 8 V8?  I see that it was listed under the BMW M62TUB44 section, but without a source.  Each of the other listed articles for automobiles which use the M62 list the engine as being used, but the Morgan article is silent on the issue.  A BMW M62 or an N62 could have been used, and both have the same displacement.  Can anyone back up what engine is used??  Nicholas SL Smith 01:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morgan Aero 8 4.4L V8 BMW Engine 

message: Are the statistics in the article for:
* The 2001–2006 version
* The 2007 version (new body)
* The 2008–2010 version (new engine)
* The Aero 8 GTN (limited edition)
* The Aero 8 GT3 (race car)
* The AeroMax (coupe)
—MJBurrage(T•C) 16:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistics
Talk:Croatian Defence Council

message: Starting in December 2012, an anonymous user from telemach.ba has pretty much rewritten the article. This may or may not have been a good thing... --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the article back to its state prior to the IP's expansion. It is based wholly on primary sources, employs original research, and has questionable neutrality. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 14:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  anonymous rewrite
Talk:Lampton School

message: Please see the manual of style, this article needs formatting correctly. There is also a vast amount of unencylopedic information I'm sorely tempted to remove. One Night In Hackney303 01:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I believe that the established date of 1959 is incorrect as I attended Spring Grove Grammar School from 1965 and it was while I was there that the school became Lampton School. 92.15.254.203 (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Established date
Talk:Callingwood, Edmonton

message: I've decided to go with one article for the two neighbourhoods because I think that is the way Edmontonians tend to think of the area.  I know a number of people who either live in, or have lived in, the Callingwood area and all of them would say they live or lived in Callingwood without qualifying it as either Callingwood North or Callingwood South.  Hence, I expect most people looking for Callingwood would search on Callingwood.  For the few who would look for either Callingwood North or Callingwood South, there are redirect pages to bring them to this page.
Johntwrl 01:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why One Article 

message: The above section attempts to rationalize why one article is used in place of separate articles for two official neighbourhoods in Edmonton. Current and former residents of the area are not reliable sources, and a personal opinion of how one thinks Edmontonians tend to think of the area is speculative. Frankly, as a former urban planner for the City of Edmonton, it was my understanding that the "Callingwood area" referred to numerous neighbourhoods in west Edmonton south of Whitemud Drive and east of Anthony Henday Drive, not just "Callingwood North" and "Callingwood South". This may be wrong or right. I don't have any references to verify the actual boundaries of "Callingwood", but the point here is to suggest that Edmonton's general population may not actually think that "Callingwood" refers to only the two neighbourhoods that share that word in their official names.
Based on the above, and on the fact that all of Edmonton's other residential neighbourhoods have their own articles, I see no reason why these two official neighbourhoods should share an article. Like I did with Patricia Heights, Rio Terrace, and Quesnell Heights (see talk), I intend to transfer relevant content that is currently or can be readily referenced to articles specific to each official neighbourhood (Callingwood North, Edmonton and Callingwood South, Edmonton), and trim this down to a brief article that points to the individual articles. Perhaps this becomes a dab page listing the two neighbourhoods instead. Hwy43 (talk) 05:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual articles
Talk:Shipwreck (G.I. Joe)

message: I want to add in the fact that Shipwreck willingly takes on Storm Shadow at one point (a hopeless, pointless fight; both knew this) but I can't think of a way to do so without it sounding too dumb to keep for Wiki Lots42 01:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Versus Storm-Shadow

message: I think we need the white hat and blue shirt Shipwreck, that is how he is better known. Lots42 (talk) 03:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I uploaded a promotional version of his original box art that was used for one of his 25th Anniversary Figure packages, and moved the other picture down to the Devils Due portion. Thoughts? Sgetz (talk) 17:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Much nicer. Lots42 (talk) 06:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I fail to see how the discrepency page is relevant, considering how Shipwreck is no longer a member of the Navy. Lots42 (talk) 00:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, much of it seems to be original research or speculation. I am in favor of removing it as it is not useful. Sgetz (talk) 17:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance 

message: I think, with sources, the Shipwreck toy being used in that other show as 'Stinky Diver' is very noteable. Lots42 (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stinky Diver
Talk:Never No Lament: The Blanton-Webster Band

message: Je suis français, je voulais dire que cet album est en double sur wikipedia // I'm french and i juste want to say there's two article about this album on wikipedia. Take a look at the "Duke Ellington" box : the first and the second album are actually the same !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.182.193.74 (talk) 17:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Percival Molson Memorial Stadium

message: It looks like the majority of this page is a copy-paste from this page at the McGill website. Here's the relevant edit: .
I'm removing the entire section that appears to be infringing copyright. I apologize if this stomps on anyone's edits, but it doesn't look like it has been much wikified if at all, so I think this is the best solution for now. if you believe that we do actually have permission to use this content, it's still in the history so you can add it back.
vasi 01:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nfitz (talk) 02:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article link to Selwyn House? 

message: I heard they their is, or was, another plan for Molson stadium to expand it to 30,000. I think that should be posted here. Also the seating history of the stadium should be too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.92.4.137 (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phase III 

message: The sponsorship hasn't changed at Molson Stadium. Budweiser is under the same ownership as Labatt Brewing Company (it's a shift in the flagship brand that has occurred in all of their sports sponsorships). PsychoJason (talk) 23:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sponsorship switch? 
Talk:Arsham Parsi

message: Not sure why this article is up for speedy deletion, since it's well-referenced and asserts notability. C1k3 (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The same vandal tried to PROD it earlier today. I have warned them. Jeffpw (talk) 18:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion 

message: The surname Parsi is indicative of a Zoroastrian?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.91.102 (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he really a Muslim? 

message: He is involved in inciting the tronto neighborhood against any person that does not donate or agree with his friends. He has been paying his friends out of donated money. sadly the worst people pretend to be leaders and are being paid by the ontario government like everywhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.49.148.92 (talk) 02:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Criminal 
Talk:Raedykes

message: Clearly meets C-class assessment however in need for more referencing to achieve b class. Franko2nd (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Class

message: stems from site of or near to Battle of Mons Graupius. Also key link turning inland for Roman invasion of Scotland. Hadrianheugh 02:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: The directions won't be much use to anyone trying to locate the site of this camp. "South of Aberdeen" - it's 12 miles (19 km) away. The grid reference NO 084090 is the summit of a boggy hill NW of Kinross, some 68 miles or 110 km away to the southeast. The proximity of two tower-houses is interesting, but irrelevant. The references should be moved to "see also"", nad a more relevant location inserted. - done
Drainage basins in the area are also irrelevant. The camp crowns the hilltop and slopes. I find the insertion of italicised portions irritating and unnecessary. A Wiki article is meant to be read, not squinted at. - done
I've inserted inline links for those forts and camps which have Wiki articles.
One of the references was to a short article on a website, and appears to be original research - no references. This doesn't meet Wiki requirements, especially at the author classifies Raedykes as a hillfort. I've removed it.
The sentence about signalling to the fleet is speculation, also removed.
"In the summer of 84 Agricola won the massed armies of the Caledonians" - no comment. Rambler24 (talk) 04:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few observations
Talk:Paul Moon

message: A lot of material in the article needs references. Nurg 02:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  From the style of writing and nature of referencing, I also suspect that much of the page has been authored by Mr. Moon himself.Te Irirangi (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed

message: Copying blurbs from a book is never acceptable and in this case probably copyvio. Dougweller (talk) 09:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable copyvio 
Talk:Energy neutral design

message: I removed Blackle from the list-- it only saves (a small amount) of energy from users who have CRT monitors-- those with LCD monitors will actually utilize more energy viewing the site, so it doesn't fit this article's own definition of energy efficiency "at all stages." See the Blackle.com article for a discussion of this.--Gloriamarie 02:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackle
Talk:Nanoor massacre

message: Isn't there something missing between sections background and the next section's first (called massacre) sentence after the massacre...? I was hoping to learn about the massacre, something about what happened... instead some say those who were killed were dacoits. How strange. --Ben  T/C  10:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing info 

message: In a weird move to 'promote' this article, User:Ghanadar galpa seeks to mass categorize. Let's have a look at the cases where I dispute the categorization he does:
*:Category:Political repressions in India: Repression is the act of a state, it is not an act of a political parties, even though that party might hold regional government power
*:Category:West Bengal], is a supercat of :Category:History of West Bengal
*:Category:Economy of India, this is not within the bounds of economy, even with a very wide definition of the term economy
*:Category:Political and cultural purges, 'purge' is not a synonym for 'killing'. Nothing in the article justifies this categorization.
--Soman (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: available at . This should be incorporated in the article somehow. --Soman (talk) 22:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing about Nanoor in it. It is a general view of land reforms, which can form a separate article. - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 02:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ""Hence, the violence in Midanpore. Since there was no dearth of licensed arms with Trinamul supporters, funded by these affluent landlords, they went on a rampage, displacing thousands of workers from villages. They began returning after two and a half years. What happened in Nanoor in July? It was a fight between farmers and landlords desperate to recapture land," he remarked." --Soman (talk) 09:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 11:32, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPI(M)'s viewpoint 
Talk:PDFedit

message: There are no FOSS programs that really let you edit the base content of a PDF, it seems.  Not even any free programs.  The PDF format is so complex that it is really almost impossible to manipulate, despite being in theory an open format.  The content is mostly ASCII, but the structure is so complicated that does not do you much good.  A tool like pdftk lets you "uncompress" the pdf to a more pure ASCII.  Notepad doesn't like the line endings, but it looks good in Wordpad.  In theory, you could now edit with a binary editor -- if only you could understand the structure.  PDFedit is 3MB, and easy to unzip.  But it depends on cygwin, which is very complicated -- unless you already have experience with cygwin, it is not worth trying this.  First install base cygwin, then get X windows working, then add the QT3 and QT3-bin options of cygwin.  Now overlay the unpacked PDFedit on top of cygwin, according the the PDFedit readme at the top of the structure tree.  Now if you are very lucky and get PATH working right etc run startwxin.bat (or whatever is the proper way to start X) and maybe you can start pdfedit and then be able to load a pdf file.  But even after all that, my displayed text font was invisible.  More to the point, PDFedit is a power tool for extreme experts.  All it does is give you access to the internal PDF file structure.  Which is so complex, you will not actually be able to do anything. -69.87.202.45 01:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You misunderstand PDF: It is not meant to be editable.--Oneiros 15:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which would be exactly what makes this program so important.  And so frustrating, at this point in it's development, because it is such a great challenge to use. -69.87.204.80 00:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complex non-user tool 

message: Does any liveCD contain PDFedit?  This would be the easiest way to try it. -69.87.202.45 01:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LiveCD?
Talk:Nishiyama Station

message: Why are we disambiguating between two articles that don't exist? 75.75.78.206 (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because we expect those articles to be written eventually.  As I answer your question today, (June 1, 2014), one of the two articles exists now.  Slambo (Speak) 11:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Red-linked disambig?
Talk:Juliet O'Hara

message: For the record, at the end of the episode, Juliet was in control of the situation before Lassiter and Shawn arrived. She had the axe in possession and the suspect was unable to do her any harm.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwuthe2 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season One Finale 
Talk:List of Cascade volcanoes

message: At least some of the coordinates are wrong. The Oregon list shows Mt. Jefferson further north than Ollalie Butte which is not correct. The coordinates for both do not match the ones given on their pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcostley (talk • contribs) 23:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates wrong

message: This is a very nice list. Unfortunately, there are no sources for including items the list. Is there a reliable source that lists all of the volcanoes in the Cascade Arc? —hike395 (talk) 11:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable source for list?
Talk:Procyclical and countercyclical variables

message: I think this really needs to be explained in the intro in a very basic way so people can understand it. I would imagine most people come here because they've heard someone talk about "pro-cyclical" fiscal policy and simply want to know what it means. It's an incredibly simple concept (if it's a recession, you cut back on spending, if you're experiencing growth, you spend more) and I think there's a case for making that clear and obvious in the intro. There's always a danger with these articles that in the search for some technically perfect definition we confuse people. Lewdswap (talk) 12:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Options strategy

message: Shouldn't an encyclopedic article on options be a bit more abstract and not say specifically that these are stock options?  Shouldn't it talk about options in general as you can have options on bonds, currencies, commodities and even other financial and non-financial assets?  I just think that this article should have all references to stock options (except any areas that specifically discuss stock options) removed and replaced with the word 'asset' or something like that.  So the first sentence would change from "...and possibly an underlying stock position." to "...and possibly an underlying asset position."  What are other people thinking about this and does anyone have a better work than asset?Terets (talk) 13:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just stock options? 

message: This is the exact same topic. I may eventually rewrite these articles. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Options spread]] into [[Options strategy]]
Talk:Mini blind

message: The history section could be longer, tracing the invention from prehistoric times to the present. The manufacturing section could use a photo tour of a factory, showing how the parts are made and assembled. Marketing section could give more about how they are chosen and installed. There could also be some about business and unions. I'm also not sure cleaning is irrelevant, since it is sometimes a major concern and part of the businesses.--Chuck Marean 19:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Window blinds include vertical blinds; mini blinds do not --Chuck Marean 02:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Window blind includes vertical blinds 

message: I'm changing the references to in-text before I forget what parts they go with. As articles get older, their quality gets better because of further reasearch & improvements of writing style. --Chuck Marean 15:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup, quality & in-text citations 

message: I reverted this edit; summarizing listings related to this topic in a phone book is not of encyclopedic value. --ZimZalaBim talk 19:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marketing

message: A miniblind is not a light source! Perhaps if you heat it to 2000 degrees C... but then its no longer a miniblind.
Tabby (talk) 18:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Light Source

message: Who are these guys? I can't find anything about them.
This looks like a joke…both sections. I suggest removing them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seffer (talk • contribs) 16:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Baird and Critoph
Talk:Stockton Beach

message: I've moved the following from Talk:Stockton_Beach,_New_South_Wales/Comments Smartse (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A newly registered editor has been removing cited content from the article, and adding content that is clearly original research, and some of this, such as the time Tin City was established, is contradicted by multiple reliable sources. I've been attempting to engage him on his talk page, without success. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: This has now been raised here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard JimMarlor (talk) 03:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute Resolution 
Talk:Non-game

message: I translated this article from the german entry (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Game). Please feel free to correct my mediocre english. I am particularly unhappy with the sentence about second life.--Klaus1000 02:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translated from German

message: I think more discussion is needed of why certain genres can be classified as non-games. From the introduction we have,
"Some genres that have been considered non-games include language-learning software, digital tabletop games, puzzle games, simulation games, and art games",
but for example puzzle games have the very explicit extrinsic objective of completing puzzles, which seems to be a very traditional type of game. GreenJonan (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres of Non-games
Talk:Nuclear power in North Korea

message: Should the Inter-Korean Summit section be placed in a chronological fashion? Twillisjr (talk) 06:41, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inter-Korean Summit 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 20:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Hello, I reviewed this article as part of an assignment for class.  After reading I did have a couple suggestions.  The first one is that when I clicked on some of the links for references they did not work.  My second one is that I noticed there were a lot of news based articles, I would like to maybe see some more scholarly articles and also updated information on the page.  Mccormick022 (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Ripsaw (newspaper)

message: The following section was removed from the article because its inclusion is completely bizarre. • Freechild'sup? 12:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous information

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. WP:SNOW move as uncontroversial and highly unlikely to fail. (non-admin closure)  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ripsaw →  – No primary topic. Ripsaw (vehicle), Ripsaw (Alton Towers), Ripsaw music and rip saw all get more page views. "Ripsaw" should be replaced with a disambiguation page. The Ripsaw might also be acceptable. Schierbecker (talk) 23:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 February 2022
File talk:67 at the 2006 Ferrari Challenge.jpg

message: This doesn't even look real.
:Note: This comment was nominated for deletion on or around 29 September 2007.  The result of the debate, as I decided, was to leave it here.  Notwithstanding, I think the image does "look real."  Shalom (Hello • Peace) 01:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL, so do I. -- But|seriously|folks  04:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Glenn Dale, Maryland

message: It seems that Glenn Dale was established out of what was once was Collington, Hundreds but I don't have any documentation on this. Where did the name come from, a property?  Can anyone shed light on this (with a citation)?  Thanks. Toddstreat1 03:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Glenn Dale and Collington