Talk:Delwar Hossain Sayeedi

message: this is a distortion image of mr delwar hossain sayeedi. as a bangladeshi  we know that mr sayeedi is the most popular religious leader of bangladesh. because of his effective speeches so many people are becoming good muslim. the anti islamic group are trying to make a bad potrait of him.
:One cannot assume virtue from popularity. Tanzeel 14:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How will u prove that he was a razakar?? read his books,listen to his audio,video cds u will get your answers.......please dont be stupid....stop talking/writing /taking decision without thinking....most of us take decisions without thinking ...why dont u think everything UNBIASEDly?? It is true that sufferer has to have pain. But those who did not do the similar crime should not be punished for political reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.102.36.2 (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allama Sayeedi is a Politician 

message: I am confused about the ‘Background’ part of this article.
The ‘Background’ part of this article is almost a copy-paste from this link: 
But the author did not provide this source in the article. What the author gave in the article (two links in ‘External Links’) does not provide us the information given in the ‘Background’. Even the second link in ‘External Links’ does not work at all.  What it informs about sayeedi? That, Sayeedi was born into a "prominent business and Zamindar family", “into a Syed family tracing their roots back to Imam Ali, “ and “his family was prominent as spiritual and religious leaders in Sylhet District” and   “Sayeedi completed his religious education at the Binori Town Madrassa in Karachi , Pakistan. He is fluent in Urdu , Bengali , Arabic , English and Punjabi.” But does the link provide a reliable source so that wikipedia can store its content ?? Look, ‘’He was born into a Syed family tracing their roots back to Imam Ali’’ – this is self-proclaimed by Sayeedi. 
Now, follow this link :
The article (found by following the second link) claims totally a different type of statement about Sayeedi’s ‘Background’. Now, does this link provide a reliable source so that wikipedia can store its content ?? If so, then the content of this article can be used. If not, the content can be ignored.
Now, if any of these links provide a reliable source so that wikipedia can store any of its content ?? If not, then shouldn’t the texts (under ‘Background’) be deleted ? Or replaced by some other statements found from a reliable source ? 
So, what is the correct step that we should take for the ‘Background’ part? NasrinatWiki (talk) 14:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion in [[Delwar Hossain Sayeedi]]'s Background

message: This article is seriously biased. Some of previous editors tried to blame International Crimes Tribunal instead of providing Sayeedi's information.--Freemesm (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP Concern 

message: Here in "Background" section http://jamaat-e-islami.org/index.php?option=com_popup_org&Sub_Menu=PR&Info_Id=17 this web page is linked as source. But that doesn't state anything about the statements.--Freemesm (talk) 15:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source doesn't state anything about the info in "Background" section 

message: How is this a reliable source? It quotes Wiki for gods sake. It is just a rumour according to the link and has no place here so I am removing it. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it's a pretty bad source. Applesandapples (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phone Controversy 

message: The war crime charges needs to be moved from controversy section since International Crime Tribunal (Bangladesh) has declared verdict on 28 February 2013 . He was proven guilty and given the death sentence. Also, more information on the trials and verdict needs to be added. --Shantonu.hossain
:I agree, more info needs to be added. However, being sentenced by the ICT does not qualify as proof of guilt, because of the tribunal's major problems and allegations of government involvement.    Applesandapples (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  War crime charges in Controversy section 

message: Was he born in 1940 or 1952? I'm seeing two different dates in the same article. When I tried to edit the article, I saw another date (1955) in the "Persondata" template. The Bengali language version of the article says 1940. I know that the vast majority of dates of birth in Bangladesh from older people are missing, but this is ridiculous. InMooseWeTrust (talk) 11:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth 

message: I would like to know why Faizan Al-Badri has undone my changes. He has cited the changes as 'mostly crap'. My changes were (in liberation war section) adding contention of Sayeedi defense to make article more balanced (bdnews24 link) and adding (in conviction section) the charges of which Sayeedi was convicted and acquitted. Unless I get a clear and rational explanation as to the 'crap' nature of the changes, I will undo the deletion. Thank you everybody.  Husain007 (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of my edits 

message: This neutrality-concerned article makes several claims but fails to cite reliable sources in support of this. Some historical information like the birth date, his alleged participation in various activities have just been accommodated without providing any RS. Another concern is it relies heavily on online news items and does not address any published and printed verifiable sources which is generally the accepted norm for WP:BLP related issues. The article should go through a scrutiny. -AsceticRosé  05:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced birth-date and age have been removed as per WP:BLP and WP:RS. Other disputed elements can be checked to comply with the policy of biography of living persons. --AsceticRosé  10:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy disputed 

message: I do not see how this is RS for anything to do with a member of Jamaat-e-Islami, especially for contentious facts. Thoughts? Darkness Shines (talk) 11:59, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  jamaat-e-islami.org 

message: Substituted at 13:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The article has been failing to meet WP:NEUTRAL, WP:GFCA and WP:NOCRIT over years. Most contents were not published from a neutral point of view. The MOS:OPENPARABIO and lead section had only negative info, thus not meeting Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. Nothing was represented fairly. Some of the users were not attentive with attributions and did not avoid sections and articles focusing on criticisms or controversies], most descriptions did not fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources as per WP:UNDUE, Balancing aspects neglected, not that much was done protect neutrality and to avoid problems like 'POV forking' as per WP:STRUCTURE. Biased statements of opinion WERE NOT presented only with in-text attribution as per WP:INTEXT etc.
User:GorgeCustersSabre, please keep an eye on the article. Thanks.--208.127.199.117 (talk) 09:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fail 

message: The below comments were made by some of the head of states and governments and human rights practices. Sources are available. Might be worth including them in the article???
Human rights......all expressed doubts about the justice served up in Bangladesh's court system.
Wikileaks has also gotten into the mix: a leaked cable from the US State Department in November 2010 stated: "There is little doubt that hard-line elements within the ruling party believe that the time is right to crush Jamaat and other Islamic parties."
Pakistan Imran Khan mentioned that the JI leader was innocent and had nothing to do with the charges against him.
Although security forces in Bangladesh have long committed grave human rights abuses, including torture and extrajudicial executions, under previous governments including both the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the ruling Awami League, enforced disappearances in particular have become a hallmark of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wazed’s current decade-long rule. When Prime Minister Hasina took office in 2009, there were three reported cases of enforced disappearances. By the next election in January 2014, there had been over 130. In the year ahead of the December 2018 election, there were 98 cases reported.
Erdogan warned that history would not forgive Bangladesh while his deputy Bekir Bozdag said that justice, human rights and the law had been trampled. 
In Bangladesh, people who question the government’s increasingly authoritarian rule fear they may be next in line to be killed or forcibly disappeared by security forces. When Human Rights Watch raises this with the Bangladeshi authorities, they are quick to dismiss the reports as lies made up by the political opposition......
Yet extrajudicial killings have become so established in Bangladesh...''
In July 2019, following its review of Bangladesh’s record, the UN Committee against Torture noted that “in general, one got the impression that the police, as well as other law enforcement agencies, were able to operate with impunity and zero accountability.”
The rights body recommended that the Bangladesh government “establish an independent vetting procedure, with appropriate UN guidance, for all military and police personnel proposed for deployment in UN peace missions and ensure that no person or unit implicated in the commission of torture, extrajudicial killing, disappearances or other serious human rights violations is selected for service.” The committee also said that it is “concerned at reports that personnel that have served with the Rapid Action Battalion have frequently been deployed for service with United Nations peace missions.”''
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the government of Newaz Sharif in Pakistan have expressed concerns over the trials on several occasions since 2010.....and blaming the ruling Awami League for political vengeance to wipe out its opposition.
"Significant human rights issues included credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, including extrajudicial killings; forced disappearance; torture or cases of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the government or its agents on behalf of the government," said the 2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices''''
--208.127.199.117 (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necessary to mention? 

message: User:Xkalponik has been removing sourced contents that specifically critises the trial of Delwar Hossain Sayeedi. I have not seen any valid reasons to remove these contents and yet, Xkalponik keeps reverting all the editors who disagree with them. This is surely disruptive and I would suggest them stop before it requires an administrative action. LucrativeOffer (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Xkalponik@LucrativeOffer please discuss here rathing than reverting each other SpaceExplorer12 (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @SpaceExplorer12, I'm not going to revert anymore edits. I think we've come to resolve this matter. Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase#Delwar_Hossain_Sayeedi . Any further revert is unwarranted here. Even if @LucrativeOffer, reverts again, I will not edit back, until an admin action. They've even removed semi-protection and multiple issues templates. I'm not participating in this mess anymore until admin action. X (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive edits by Xkalponik 

message: His father name is ইউসুফ শিকদার Rohanx98 (talk) 18:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's name