Talk:Antonov An-22

message: Is the translation of the An-22's Russian name Antey, which is on the page, or Antei, which is what most of my aircraft books say? - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 14:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The transliteration of Cyrillic into the Latin alphabet is un- (or more accurately over-)standardized. ("Standards are great! There's so many to choose from", Andrew S. Tanenbaum quipped.) According to Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian, it should be Antey. According to Romanization of Russian, it could be Antej, Anteĭ, or Antey. In practice, the ALA-LC system, which is Anteĭ, will frequently be written Antei. If Antei is what's usually used, it should at least be listed. (Yes, I realize the question is almost 4 years old, but hopefully the answer will be useful to editors.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 05:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name 

message: The opening sentence states that the AN-22 was the largest aircraft. It does not make clear that this was true at the time it was introduced.
Also, this statement appears to ignore the Spruce Goose. I realise that the latter never went into full production, but this article does not make it clear that the comparison is with production aircraft only. 194.237.142.6 09:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  An in order An225 An124 An22 An70 then the rest  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.3.218.98 (talk) 05:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest aircraft? 

message: Hi, The Indian air force never operated the An-22. It operated the An-12 (retired) and still operates large numbers of An-32  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.112.18.35 (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also Cameroon never operated An-22. The only operator of this plane was Soviet union, after whose collapse it remained in Russia and 2 pieces in Ukraine. It was once leased by Bulgaria but never exported. Thus Cameroon operating An-22 is some kind of hoax.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.237.227.51 (talk) 10:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cameroon vandalism is the product of a persistent nuisance - the vandal in question continually adds Cameroon as an operator to all sorts of unlikely combat gear, some far more exotic than the An-22.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality vandalism

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antonov An-22. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407095537/http://www.chapman-freeborn.com/en/cargo_aircraft_specifications to http://www.chapman-freeborn.com/en/cargo_aircraft_specifications
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The total production (numbers built) is shown as 68, but only 6 are shown as in service by two operators.  Where are the remaining 62 aircraft? Santamoly (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: According to https://rzjets.net/aircraft/?typeid=249 most have been withdrawn from use and either still stored or broken up for scrap. MilborneOne (talk) 08:47, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers built?