Talk:In the Light of Truth: The Grail Message

message: [This article is tendencious, informing the user that "The Grail Message" is the truth. It need to be more neutral and only inform about the religion.]: Emmisgood (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Some of this article is copied-and-pasted from http://www.grailmessage.com/ILT_Page.htm Kristamaranatha (talk) 01:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy and Pasted 

message: Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  From the horse's mouth 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on In the Light of Truth: The Grail Message. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140705200103/http://grailmessage.com/en/contents/ to http://grailmessage.com/en/contents/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090926064633/http://ao-institut.com/LANG/EN/ to http://ao-institut.com/LANG/EN/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The charge of the edit warring user is that Wikipedia spilled the beans about a fact... that is publicly known since 1931 from the work published by Abd-ru-shin himself. Isn't that silly? See Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. Jiddu Krishnamurti and Haile Selassie have publicly denied that they were the Messiah. Abd-ru-shin has never done that, he has never retracted his claim of being the Son of Man, who brings to Word of God before the Final Judgment. He deleted it from his book, but that is not the same as a retraction: he has never apologized for calling himself the Son of Man, who restores WP:THETRUTH after the failed mission of Jesus Christ. In his opinion, the Word of God is Abd-ru-shin's own book, the Bible being thoroughly antiquated.
Il y a par exemple cette directive que l’auteur donna en 1937 à l’occasion du transport d’un stock de livres de la grande édition du Message du Graal, de la Suisse au Vomperberg en Autriche : 
" Je vous demande encore une chose : avant l’expédition, faites enlever, dans tous les livres, quelque soit la langue en laquelle ils sont imprimés, la feuille qui se trouve avant l’Appendice et qui comporte l’indication au sujet de IMANUEL !
C’est très important, car, ainsi, le Message sera beaucoup plus facilement propagé et devra être considéré plus objectivement. Il sera alors intangible, pour les ennemis aussi. L’indication directe ferait surgir involontairement, chez tel ou tel lecteur, une opposition, parce que le genre de l’esprit humain est ainsi.
Si cette feuille ne s’y trouve plus, le Message sera reçu plus facilement. Mais il ne faut la retirer que dans les exemplaires qui sont vendus maintenant, parce qu’elle pourra, plus tard, s’y trouver de nouveau. "
La feuille dont il est question ici est intitulée « Mot de la fin ».
Copy/paste from :fr:Discussion:Message du Graal#Une page "délicate" dans la grande édition de 1931.
So, even among Abd-ru-shin's believers there is a conflict between the loyalists of the great edition and the loyalists of the edition of last hand. tgeorgescu (talk)  11:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silly edit war