lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Collectivist anarchism

message: This article has problems with its scope. Outside of the lead, almost nothing in this article is clearly about collectivist anarchism itself. Either talking at length about factional disputes inside the IWA, bringing up issues of collectivization that aren't clearly linked to collectivist anarchism, or repeating information already summarized in the lead - using lots of original interpretation of primary sources:
*The section titled "First International" is largely about the anti-authoritarian faction within the IWA, not specifically about the collectivist tendency. The only references to "collectivism" in this section appear to be original research, as they're attributed to primary sources which don't actually explain what is laid out in the text of this article.
*The beginning of the "Theory" section is largely cited to primary sources (Bakunin's Catechism and Guillaume's Ideas) that don't actually use the term "collectivism" or "collectivist". While the only other source is self-published, and thus ventures on being considered unreliable.
*The section titled "Critique of Marxism" has absolutely nothing to do with collectivist anarchism - merely recounting the conflict between Marx and Bakunin, and in turn between the Marxists and anarchists in the IWA. What's here, that isn't already copied directly from the articles about those subjects, could easily be moved over there.
*The section titled "Comparison with anarcho-communism" largely just reiterates a couple lines from the lead but with a lot more words. Again it's cited largely to a primary source (Guillaume) that doesn't even use the term "collectivist" or "collectivism", while the lengthy quote from the Anarchist FAQ doesn't add anything meaningful not already mentioned - just repeating more of the same.
*The section titled "Performance" is about collectivization during the Spanish Revolution of 1936. One of its sources never even used the word "collectivist" or "collectivism", while the other only mentioned "collectivism" through the lens of traditional Spanish agrarianism - not as a specifically anarchist tendency. So it's unclear how it relates to collectivist anarchism, even with the original research that incorrectly interprets the sources.
As such, I have been bold and provisionally removed all sections but the lead, which is the only part of the article that really stays on target as to what this article is about. If you can find reliable secondary sources that we can use to verify information, then please feel free to reinstate sections you feel should be. But as of now, I think rebuilding the article from scratch is a better option. Grnrchst (talk) 10:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now rewritten the article. Hopefully this provides a better skeleton for future expansion. -- Grnrchst (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on scope
Talk:Assamese literature

message: I shall be merging the section from Assamese language here since that section reads more like the history of Assamese literature.  Chaipau 18:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging from [[Assamese language #History]]

message: I'm trying to turn this text into readable English, but I don't understand the meaning of the following: "when selling of Assamese books increased then English books". Does it mean that sales of books in Assamese have surpassed the sales of books in English or only that the sales of books in Assamese are growing faster than the sales of books English? Огненный ангел (talk) 10:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary Assamese literature
Talk:Company of Merchant Adventurers of London

message: The source, which I have used in expanding this article, is a somewhat old text book.  This may (possibly) mean that I have expressed views that are not those of more recent historians.  If so, I hope some one will add further sources and corrections.  I suspect that I could have said more of its inner workings.  Having expanded the articel to a reasonable length, I have removed the 'stub' template.  Peterkingiron 18:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Remixed! (Scissor Sisters EP)

message: There was a note about the availability of the album on Amazon for something in the area of four dollars. I have removed this note, since it didn't really add enough to make up for the fact that it's terribly unencyclopedic. Fragarach (talk) 08:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Amazon
Talk:Carl Hubbell

message: Fernando Valenzuela struck out 3 future Hall of Famers Dave Winfield, Reggie Jackson, and George Brett. Dwight Gooden struck out 3 batters who did not become Hall of Famers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.154.10.158 (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1984 Strikeout Feat Does Not Match Hubbell's 
Talk:Bill Dickey

message: Hi, I just moved the Hall of Fame to the first graph, created sections and other edits. Noticed that story about Dickey's mentor, Ed Dickey, being in the dugout with him, Cobb biting his finger off, etc. Did this actually occur? I'm going to research it a bit and take it out if it's vandalism. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No data on Google except as a copy of this page, likely vandalism, removed mention. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Albert Edwin Dickey

message: Hi I'm writing the french article about Bill Dickey. Could you please, give more informations about him ?
Max Duval (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  French article 

message: # Baseball Reference says he won seven times. As a player(7) , As a manager(0) 
# Hall of Fame  says he won seven times. Official Youtube also says seven times.(search 'Bill Dickey - Baseball Hall of Fame Biographies' on youtube)
So I asked why he should be 14 before, and his answer was because he won the ws as a coach. And I asked again, there are various coaches in baseball, so can they all be winners? I asked which employee is considered the winner, and his answer was that 'you are garbage'. So who is more groundless between me and the person who claims to be 13?
Don't only ask me for basis without asking others. In the version more than 10 years ago, it said 7, 8, and I think it was changed to 13 and 14 afterwards without basis. That's why I'm asking. Why does it have to be 13? 221.143.186.107 (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He was on the Yankees roster for 13 WS championships. Coaches count. Who said "you are garbage"? Nobody did on this talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   'garbage' was mentioned in other discussion i didn't say he said that here. Is it Wikipedia's official view that coaches are counted? I've rarely seen other coaches count except for team managers in other sports. 221.143.186.107 (talk) 22:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

text:  Since I have never edited a baseball article except for this, I will accept it if there was such a consensus among users. Because I didn't know that. But if not, it's a little hard to understand personally.  221.143.186.107 (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASIS.
Talk:Registered Traveler

message: This page was edited on 11 September by someone who removed all critical information and replaced the page with an advert for the Clear scheme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermtt (talk • contribs) 18:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of criticism 

message: I work for RTGO and just updated some info about it. I didn't bother signing in since this isn't a very popular article and nobody really cares but if you wish to reword it go ahead. New info at flocard.com. The takeover took effect on the first of September.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.228.52.221 (talk) 15:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTGo information updating 

message: The picture shows a kiosk that is cordoned off and has a sign on it saying the Clear program has been shut down and won't be operating in the future. This is misleading since a program using that brand is currently operating at full strength, being used by thousands of passengers every day. It would be nice to replace the photo with a picture of a current operational kiosk. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kiosk photo
Talk:Cypress Lawn Memorial Park

message: CLMP was early populated by folks who were dug up in San Francisco and replanted here.  I just did that to:
*Calvin E. Simmons (1950-1982), musical prodigy, conductor, musician
I did a search for him and found nothing on him except wikipedia and its mirrors.  My feeling is that he can stay here until an article about him appears, or at least until more is revealed.  Carptrash 18:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just discovered some info about Simmons which I hope will result in an article - but first i need to clear up a few copyright issues first. Carptrash 19:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that an article on Simmons will be appearing soon, so i am going to move him back into the cemetery. Carptrash 17:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-internment 

message: Maybe a good article will bring some life to this cemetaryObbop 19:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the source I added today. There are many notables with wikilinks that could be added. I do not have time this morning to add to the list (see  Notables). Ronbo76 16:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible additions
Talk:The Pirate (novel)

message: The given source states that its only a LIST of reviews, so I wonder how the WP author knows if they are good or bad or mediocre. Is there any chance to give us exact sources and to prove the point by quoting these sources? "Some critics say so, others say so" is very vague. 95.90.117.180 (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Intermediate Depression

message: The article states that: "...The most agriculturally active region is concentrated between Biobío and the Los Lagos Region, where the Depression terminates."
Actually, the most agriculturally active region stretches from the rural areas around Santiago to the Los Lagos Region. Stating that "the most agriculturally active region" starts at the Biobío region leaves out the overwhelmingly agricultural and viticultural regions of Lib. Bernardo O'Higgins (VI Region) and Maule (VII Region). I suggest that the mentioned paragraph be amended to reflect the actual facts.
Thank you.
200.104.58.126 18:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Agriculture

message: This is relevant and interesting material, however, it seems to me that it is not a subject that has any real meaning to an English speaking reader outside of the context of Chilean geography.  The title seems to have nothing to do with any established, known and universal geographical concept as far as I know.  If I'm wrong then the article needs to be expanded to discuss this phenoma as it occurs in other countries and areas.  --JAXHERE | Talk 01:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has also been proposed that this article be merged into Chilean Central Valley.  I recently saw this article and felt that they both should be merged into the single article about Chilean Geography.  Is there anyone else with any ideas about this -- for or against? --JAXHERE | Talk 22:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Cathedral of the Holy Spirit

message: Two photos show the facade and the courtyard: http://skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=162207
Freder1ck 18:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos of the Cathedral 

message: http://www.asianews.it/view_p.php?l=en&art=7217
Freder1ck 19:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources on the Upcoming Papal Visit
Talk:Hawks Nest State Park

message: I have created an article about Hawks Nest State Park.  Previously the article was a redirect to an article about the Hawk's Nest incident.  I did not create this article to deprecate the Incident, or the lives that were sadly lost.  Please note that there is a wikilink to the incident article in the introduction paragraph.  Hawks Nest State Park, while linked to the tragic tunnel construction thoughout time by both name and locality, is a separate geographical place, and deserves its own article. WVhybrid 18:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mortal Kombat (1995 soundtrack)

message: Some joker added "Creeping death" do the tracklist - there is no Metallica song on this soundtrack, nor in the movie. Removed. M3n747 (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tracklisting

message: Ссылки на RIAA ведёт на «page not found» (читай, что в никуда); ссылка на Allmusic редиректит на поиск (читай, что тоже в никуда), и к тому же рабочей копии в Архиве Интернетов нет. Gleb95 (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Извиняюсь за русский. Вновь.
Talk:Mortal Kombat: The Album

message: I'd like to see an actual "professional review" of this album, not the imaginary Allmusic review cited earlier. It's been removed now. 129.2.198.186 (talk) 23:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating doesn't exist 
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-09-10 List of Tallest buildings and structures in Paris

message: Gosh. Is this really the first talk comment?
Anyway... I was invited to... advise?... on all this great debate. But I'm not going to, sorry. Or at least I'm not going to hold the ring in any sense. But I will say... from the point of view of an Englander... that I would expect the corresponding English page to be ...in London, and not worry about what the exact boundaries would be. I would also say that you have to think about people searching for this page, so it needs to respond to "tallest buildings paris"... and in general shorter titles are better. But ultimately I would go with Hardouins comment I was thinking today there are people who are dying of starvation in Niger at the very same moment that some rich Westerners waste so much time and energy in totally useless controversies like this one. So although I would tend to be on his side on the naming issue, I humbly suggest that this is going to be one of those arguments you look back on in future years and think "why did I bother"? And if one side has realised that, then... William M. Connolley 18:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unwelcome view from an outsider
File talk:DvorakQuartet13FinaleAndante.png

message: my reasoning was cut off a bit there. I believe that since Dover republished the Simrock edition unedited, claims no copyright and gives no warnings, that the © has expired.  My reasoning may be poor here (though obviously I don't actually think it is likely to be so). Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The image contains an enormous amount of whitespace.  Could someone please crop the image?  Thanks. DavidRF (talk) 06:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  crop the image
Talk:Shabbir Ahmad Usmani

message: Wikipedia articles follow the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and its associated guides which have been developed by the Wikipedia community in order to make Wikipedia articles easier to read, higher quality and generally consistent in appearance.
I have reverted the edits of User: 99.240.111.186, which have not been in the Wikipedia style, for the following reasons:
# Dates should no longer be linked in Wikipedia, unless there is a really good reason to do so. See WP:CONTEXT#Date
# It is incorrect to link plain English words or to link the same thing over and over. These links, like date links, add clutter to articles without providing useful information. See WP:OVERLINK.
# Links should not be made to articles that do not exist yet unless you plan to write an article for those subjects really soon. Books published in a foreign language are a good example of subjects about which there is likely never going to be a Wikipedia article (unless you write one yourself). These “dead links” appear in red, and make the article more difficult to read.
# Headings must follow “sentence case”, and not “Title Case”. In sentence case, only the first word and proper nouns (like the names of people, places and organizations) should be capitalized. Don’t capitalize all the words as you would in Title Case. See WP:MOSHEAD.
# External sources (i.e., not other Wikipedia articles) should be provided for any information that is added. See Wikipedia:Verifiability.
# Articles should be written in a neutral tone. See WP:NPOV. Just report the facts, and let readers draw their own conclusions. We do not have to tell the reader that the subject of the article was a good person or a great scholar. If the person’s actions and words show this, then the reader will draw that conclusion for her or himself. 
I will continue to revert changes that violate the Wikipedia Manual of Style or other policies, and will protect the article to prevent these changes if necessary. Ground Zero | t 14:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Wikipedia articles

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:MediaSentry

message: This doesn't sound too legal. - Thekittenofterra 23:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, stealing music is still illegal. Some crackpots believe otherwise. ;) Dynablaster (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legality 

message: Is this notable? http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/09/15/1843234.shtml - (Unregistered) 07:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Internal Emails of An RIAA Attack Dog Leaked" 

message: This page was moved to a redirect to SafeNet a few months ago. Now that SafeNet has sold the company, I've returned the content here to its own page.  I've updated the content based on the edits made to the SafeNet article, so it should be current, but may need layout editing. Rurik (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-adding content

message: Since when is the New York Times considered an unreliable source? Rees11 (talk) 21:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The New York Times was removed in error. Dynablaster (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT not reliable? 
Talk:North Nova Education Centre

message: Greetings editors!
If you are looking to improve this article, please examine the guidelines on creating school articles.  When articles are assessed, this is generally what assessors are looking for when they judge structure.  You can specifically look at the section on what not to include to help decide if you are accidentally including information that does not belong in the article.  Specificaly, things like telephone numbers and names of students who are not notable should not be included.  Details about team championships that are below the provincial level are also not included.  Individual championships of any kind are not included. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Some notes on article inclusion/exclusion
Talk:Guarani languages

message: The spelling of the words "Tupi" and "Guarani" is nor consistent within the Wikipedia. Sometimes they appear with accute accents ("Tupí" and "Guaraní") which is the Spanish version, and sometimes without these accents (the Portuguese version). Tsf 19:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. If we assume that Wikipedia is to be written in English, then I think they should be written without accents. FilipeS 19:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accents 

message: This page says that Guarani I and II are Guarani languages. Tupi-Guarani languages says that these are two independent branches. Can we reconcile? Are the Guarani languages not monophyletic, or does the T-G article need updating? kwami (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be just another of the hundreds of cases where Ethnologue worded the families differently in their various language articles, so that the automated cladistic generator produced multiple branches. For example, "Guarayu-Siriono-Jora II" does not contain Guarayu or Siriono, which are listed under "Subgroup II". It would appear that the two branches are synonymous, and merely lacked a human editor to put them together. Subgroup I was also split. I'm going to assume from this that Pauserna and Aurá are simply not overtly classified, rather than independent branches, pending a RS that they actually are independent branches. kwami (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Groups

message: According to Guarani language, it would appear that "Guarani language" is synonymous with "Guarani languages". Do we have any ref that Mbya Guarani, Ava Guarani, etc. are more distant than Bolivian & Paraguayan Guarani? kwami (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Imajica

message: I'll be slowly fixing up this article as I read through the book again for the first time in years.  Quiddity99 19:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd do it myself, but I don't want to go mucking around in what appears to be an actual project 72.171.0.139 (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: The first thing needed is a disambiguation page.  The only way I could get to this page was through a link on the Clive Barker page.  Searching for the term "imagica" doesn't have a way to get to this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.224.50 (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Searching with the phrase "Imajica" brings you right to this page.  Quite simple. Quiddity99 (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should it be mentioned somewhere that at least some of the paperback editions of the book are split into two volumes: Imajica Book 1: The Fifth Dominion and Imajica Book 2: The Reconciliation?
It was a bit odd when I read the site, as I was only aware of the two-volume edition and I wondered a bit why it was being discussed as though it were a single book.  Maybe something should be mentioned about this?  It would also help so that people who see "Imajica Book 2" on sale know it's not a sequel to the original one-volume version, but rather the latter half of that original book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.143.138 (talk) 23:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two-volume edition? 

message: It's taken quite some skill to write such a detailed summary and leave out any hint of the major themes of love, sex, what men and women are to themselves and each other, the antagonism of God and the Goddesses mirroring this, and so on.
Not even to mention the fact that one extremely major character is not a man or a woman, but a third gender - surely a very interesting concept, rare in fiction, and a big part of the story in its relationship with one of the other characters.  From this description you would understand it to be a gay man.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.42.119 (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does the summary leave so much out?