lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Don King

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 July 2021 

message: The page states that King was born in 1931 and that he graduated high school in 1931, making him 20 years old at graduation. Now, idk if this is true or not, but it seemed odd to me, so I wanted to bring it up. 142.105.160.14 (talk) 02:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  20 years old graduating high school  

message: The article did not mention this movie. James Earl Jones played boxing promoter Jack Madrid, clearly modeled on Don King. Misterdoe (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegas Casino Strip War
Talk:David Crane (lawyer)

message: The earlier version of this page hot-linked to a popular Sri Lankan entertainer who bears the same family name.
Adding the acronym QC - English abbreviation for Queen's Counsel, an honorific used as part of the barrister's professional name - distinguishes Mr. de Silva QC from Mr. de Silva the entertainer.
More information concerning Desmond de Silva QC may be obtained from his web site, http://www.2pb.co.uk/.
It was my privilege to serve as Counsel to the Prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 2002-2003. In that capacity, I worked with Mr. Crane and Mr. de Silva QC daily.
Bruce M. MacKay
Bruce.MacKay.Esq@gmail.com
68.48.252.11 00:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Baugé

message: Can we get a map of this battle?Cameron Nedland 20:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I had always understood that it was the Earl of Buchan who personally despatched the Duke of Clarence with his mace. Furthermore, no mention of the Earl of Wigtown (Victon- in French documents) co-leader of the Scots force in France at the time, and one of great importance: Buchan although holding Scots royal authority, the majority of his men were loyal primarily to Wigtown. I am also sure that Buchan was Constable by the time of this battle, therefore have tagged it awaiting sourced material. Brendandh 03:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Few points

message: Deleted the external link as the original domain had expred and it was being squatted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.156.151.41 (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted the external link 

message: In the intro and everywhere else, the English army comprises 10,000 men; in the first paragraph of the battle, it is down to 1,500... There wouldn't be anything glorious for an army of 6,000 Scots to beat an English army of "less than 1,500 men", would it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.196.50.189 (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this article has multiple problems. No citations for one thing. -- Asteuartw (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Scottish chroniclers based the numbers in the English army on contemporary estimates. However as the payroll records still exist for the English and Scottish armies, more accurate figure can be calculated. Although Clarence's army was around 4000 strong most of them were foraging and pillaging the countryside when Clarence heard about the disposition of the Franco-Scots army. He attacked with just the men he had available in his camp at the time (about 1500) despite his lieutenants advising caution. His impatience was rewarded by his demise. Wilfridselsey (talk) 12:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in the numbers
Talk:Battle of Wyse Fork

message: How can this be called a strategic victory?: Bragg had only momentarily been able to check Cox's advance. Schofield's forces reached two full corps and were organized into the Army of the Ohio. Sherman's armies, which had just defeated Johnston's army at Bentonville, joined with Schofield at Goldsboro on March 23. Facing three Union armies, Johnston retreated to the north and on April 26 Johnston surrendered to Sherman. Creuzbourg (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategic victory?
Talk:Siege of Hull (1642)

message: This article has the title, "Siege of Hull" but doesn't say anything about a siege. It says that John Hotham seized the city and made himself Military Governor. When the king turned up he was refused entry, twice. But the article doesn't say anything about a siege. Who was beseiging the city; when did the siege start; when did it end; why did it end. Basic questions an article about a siege should answer. Thank you. Cottonshirtτ 20:09, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic details required 

message: Having read this Good Article, I have incorporated some relevant information into the article on Lord Lindsey, which up till now lacked mention of his involvement in this siege and whose account of his Civil War experience is somewhat monopolised by his participation in the Battle of Edgehill later in 1642 that led to his death. To the best of my ability I have today added the citations used into it. However, I invite especially users who contributed to this present article to look at what I have put in Lindsey's article and make any corrections or rephrases necessary and also check if the information I use is supported by the citations I added.Cloptonson (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Robert Bertie, 1st Earl of Lindsey]]
Talk:Battle of Grenada

message: Was it indecisive as stated in the text, or a French tactical and strategic victory, as stated in the info box, despite the French losing many more men killed and wounded? Dabbler 18:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't catch it in the article.  I'd add that little comment into the article itself. 
Oh, and the "battle" section needs to be reworded to fit encyclopedic prose.  "hauled off" and "badly mauled" are two phrases I rarely see in an Encyclopedia :)
Cam (Chat) 22:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

message: There is no "Georgetown" on the southwest coast of Grenada.  Should this reference be changed to St. George's, Grenada?  --Russ Blau (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Georgetown" 

message: This image link does not display in the article.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b4/BattleGreneda.gif/270px-BattleGreneda.gif  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.69.65.2 (talk) 15:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dead Image" 

message: I've just expanded the order of battle for the British fleet, following William Laird Clowes' statistics. He gives 183 killed and 346 wounded, as does an uncited piece of the existing text. The infobox, citing Castex, gives 1,055 total British casualties which is a big difference. I don't have access to the Castex source but hope someone else might be able to confirm or deny whether that figure is actually stated. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need to be careful with Castex as a source - in his book Dictionnaire des batailles navales franco-anglaises it has many battles which doesn't exist and its title is self explanatory. In addition his casualty figures are much exaggerated. An English comparison might as well be Death to the French by Philip Wight. Eastfarthingan (talk) 23:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any other sources that cite British casualties? This isn't my standard period and apart from Clowes I'm unsure where to look, but would like to have at least one more source to push the scales one way or the other on this matter. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re sourced with Clowes & Latour for now. I'll loot for some others in the meantime. Eastfarthingan (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  British casualties
Talk:Battle of Yungay

message: New International Encyclopedia contains a paragraph about Yunca Indian tribes of Peru, but nothing on Yungay.  The word Yungay may be non-existent.  Superslum 12:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yunca Indian tribes
Talk:Jim Cantore

message: Somebody PLEASE paraphrase this article.  It was obviously largely copied from weather.com and that is illegal and against Wikipedia policy. --Kitch 00:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For now, it has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia policy.  The Hooded Man 13:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: I cleaned this up a bit. I think it takes care of copy-vio and POV problems. What do you think? Realkyhick 22:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK, how does it look now? 

message: I do not believe Jim Cantore reported from Andrew. I believe he was in studio for that one. I could be mistake but I seem to recall him being in the studio... this is backed up by a special the weather channel did not long ago celebrating their 20th year.
:Yes, he was in studio when Andrew slammed South Florida, thus I deleted the section. --Moreau36 01:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew 

message: I deleted the section because not only that the section was unsourced, but it grew to a long list, which is totally discouraged. --Moreau36 11:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricane reporting locations 

message: The article says he was born February 16, 1964, in White River Junction, Vermont. But later it states that he's a native of Waterbury, CT, and raised in White River Junction. Which one is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.122.66 (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: Jim heard you are in the area. We welcome you. Hope to catch up with you. I’m sure you’ll see thunder snow here.
Wally 2603:7080:2406:83B7:5C40:42E7:BD71:6409 (talk) 00:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffalo weather
Talk:Operation Maslenica

message: The article fails to mention the casualties sustained by UN forces during the operation.DagosNavy 15:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UNPROFOR Casualties

message: The initialism JNA is undefined, and I for one do not know what it means. PKKloeppel (talk) 15:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the Yugoslav People's Army. I added a small clarification. Ucucha 15:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: JNA?

message: If this is not Greater Serbian POV, I sincerely don’t know what it should be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.52.110.221 (talk) 07:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: “…commanded by the notorious Željko Ražnatović Arkan, improved Krajina-morale to a certain extent”

message: Sanader's statement was supposedly made on May 1, yet the source dates the Mesić's reaction to April 27, so this can't be true. It is possible that the text conflates two unrelated events and corresponding statements. GregorB (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: The text says that, regarding the 491 figure, "Serbian sources mostly agree", yet the sole Serbian source cited in the infobox says 348.
Regarding the Croatian losses:
* The infobox says 114, with a source
* hrt.hr source in the article says 57 (citing contemporary reports)
* In the same source, President Mesić says 185
* The same source reports Croatian MoD was unable to provide a figure
I suppose more research is needed here. GregorB (talk) 10:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Losses
Talk:Logic Express

message: From the article: "Logic Express 7 is a program for music production developed by Apple and based on Logic Pro 6". Well, I guess any software >v.1.0 is based on a previous version. Is there something important behind the fact that it is "based on Logic Pro 6" or can we delete that part? Peter S. 00:39, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does the main article mean when it uses the word "mixdown"?
The relevant paragraph is given here as:
"Logic Pro and Express share most functionality and the same interface. Logic Express is limited to two-channel stereo mixdown, while Logic Pro can handle multichannel"
Does it mean there is some kind of a lossy compression going on?   Usually when you combine two frequencies, you are multiplying the frequencies against each other.   (This results in a lot of beats or harmonics, if I am using the right word.)   What does "mixdown" mean here?   Is there some kind of frequency clipping also, like running the product through a filter?
Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that Express could only generate stereo audio files whereas Logic Pro could create 5.1 and 7.1 surround mixes. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixdown?
Talk:Battle of Secessionville

message: This is my first and, hopefully, last attempt at a battle history.  I do not like writing military history.  I know that there are about a score of templates, boxes, maps and the like that battle authors like to employ.  I know of none of them and invite those who are conversant to prettify at will.  Geogre 11:34, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Milhists

message: In the Battle section no ranks are given for Horatio G. Wright and Isaac I. Stevens.  With breveting and temporary ranks and all I'm not sure of the appropriate rank to insert. WikiParker (talk) 12:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both were brigadier generals of volunteers. I updated it. Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranks

message: The title is great, but the actual name of the battle that books are named after, annual reenactments are named after, and that people look back at is Secessionville. it was a major battle on James Island, but I suggest renaming this article back to Secessionville, and redirect "battle of James Island" to this. great article though  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.43.117.162 (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. That's how it is in the Campaignbox as well as at the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission of the American Battlefield Protection Program, a unit of the National Park Service, which was the source for all of the WP:MILHIST civil war campaign organization. See http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/abpp/battles/bycampgn.htm If there are no objections anytime soon, I'll move it back. Mojoworker (talk) 17:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey
Talk:Garrison Hearst

message: So how did I do?--72.10.241.61 00:45, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a category tag on the article, yet the article says nothing about his supposed opposition to LGBT rights.  Either something should be added to support this categorization, or the tag should be removed.  Fishhead64 21:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT rights opposition
Talk:Elche

message: Why was the World Heritage section removed? --Error 00:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Heritage

message: I added a link pointing to "A Handful of Spanish Towns" It's a travel story connecting Elche, Orihuela, Murcia, Cartagena and Alicante.
Scribbleman 08:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please wait for a response on this talkpage when you announce your intentions to include these Terje Raa travel stories. Don’t include them yourself, as including these links are your only contributions here, you seem to have a conflict of interest. Please wait for community input, thanks. --Van helsing 12:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link

message: The Population Density in the Infobox is wrong. How is it correctable? Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 17:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISTAKE 

message: Municipalities, where a similar quantity of inhabitants that are not capital of a province, such as Gijón, Terrassa, Sabadell and Móstoles are assessed as mid importance at least in the project.
--Yolanda95 (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Mid importance in the wikiproject of Spain
Talk:Herbal medicine

message: Appropriately, plants are mentioned repeatedly on this page, but mushrooms and other fungi are not.  I hope this can be appropriately remedied. 2603:7080:7B06:2A00:90C:2B7B:1A8:8551 (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mushrooms and other fungi in herbalism 

message: -safety and efficacy
The second sentence on safety and efficacy is entirely editorialized and does not reflect the source, as well as falsely labeling the criticism of the herbal market as the criticism of herbalism itself, I would like to use my wording instead as it accurately represents the source and provides both better wording and more information on the criticism of herbalism and the herbal market
-market criticism 
I was never told why this is removed but I’d like to add it as its informative criticism of the herbal market which used the sources in the above sentence, I don’t know what to counterpoint as I was never told why it was removed
-Paraherbalism
Again I was never told why this was removed, I used the source which uses Varro Eugene Tyler who coined the term for the addition of the pharmaceutical conspiracy, I don’t know what to counterpoint as I was never told why this was removed, I find it more informative and accurately representing the source Bobisland (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating talk page to discuss adding my recent edits which include safety, market criticism and Paraherbalism 

message: I think this article article has a pretty poor bias for herbal medicine, it just completly shames the entire use of it and ignores that reliable sources don't necasarily condone it. https://medlineplus.gov/herbalmedicine.html
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/herbal-medicine
This gov source states how you should "Talk to your doctor first before using it" and that it and isn't exactly bad. They state that many herbal medicines come with it's bunch of side effects, but saying that it's a false or psudeoscientific thing is quite bias. While some scientists or doctors don't like it's usage, it's still debated upon if effective or not. And from the John Hopkins source, they even state that you again, Should talk to your doctor and check labels before using it. It never says that it's completey ineffective. Even if we don't use these sources, they are still very reliable and give useful information. If I'm taking info on using herbal medicine of any kind, I'm not using this page. I see it needa a little updating. The sources that we present aren't bad ones, just need to list the other side to show that it isn't complete phony "Psudeoscience". Aalji (talk) 22:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page bias 

message: Why is an obscure neologism coined by a deceased expert in postage stamps being used as a terms to describe a topic relevant to medicine? 2600:1700:448D:BC10:2021:E3E7:D72E:8B79 (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Paraherbalism”
Talk:Radioteletype

message: Could someone who knows adds some information on the history of RTTY, e.g. when it was first used? I know that Baudot codes have been around since the 1870s; is RTTY of similar provenance? -- Cabalamat 01:04, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Eyreland added a lengthy section named History but I removed it, as it seemed to be a copyvio (). Mysid 10:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've added some details to the history of RTTY. More to follow as I find time to research my files for original documents to reference. Wa3frp (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

text: The history section seems inaccurate based on History of radio, because it is hard to square the dates in that article with an 1840s or even 1870s beginning to radioteletype. Put simply: this article needs to explain how there could be radioteletype before there was radio. Brianwc (talk) 04:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

message: I understand that this section is a technical description, but even for a technical description it is too technical. There is an excessive amount of unexplained jargon, with acronyms or terms like "UART," "mark state," "digital logic levels," and "5-bit character." I'm a layperson and extremely, hopelessly lost. Please, someone rewrite this section in friendlier, streamlined terms. It might help to break it into subsections under the main heading. Could the three distinct parts be their own subsections? i.e. Teletype, Modem, and Radio  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contortrix (talk • contribs) 20:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: HI Amy, I'm not sure if you are still active on Wikipedia as I see that your last edit was done on July 2012, but I thought that I'd reply anyway.  You noted above that acronyms or terms like "UART," "mark state," "digital logic levels," and "5-bit character" appear to be unexplained jargon.  I've just checked and the terms, such as UART and digital logic, link to the main article on that subject. I've added a link for five-bit character.  I hope that this helps you.  Wa3frp (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical description too technical
Category talk:Computing acronyms

message: Please check out the List of computing and IT abbreviations for a significant number of acronyms.  Please note that the scope of 'abbreviations' is broader than that of 'acronyms'.
^ Adding to that, I think a good differentiating factor is that acronyms are usually pronounceable like a real word.TOFU, POJO, and SCSI are good examples. so by this general "rule", the abbreviations become acronyms if they are pronounced as they look. 2600:1700:3051:3FD0:19B2:E3DA:654B:A83D (talk) 01:40, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Music of Transylvania

message: By defining Transylvanian music as Hungarian, this article is highly POV. Sure, the Hungarian influences on Transylvanian music should be mentioned, but Transylvania's culture is more Romanian than Hungarian, and this should be reflected in the article.  Ronline ✉ 00:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected this to an extent, by using content from Music of Romania.  Ronline ✉ 00:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree that Music of Transsylvania should not be included in hungarian music history. It's wrong to have it included under hungarian music as a whole, but if hungarians want to discuss music played by those ethnicly so, then an article "Hungarian music in transsylvania" should be created. Alzwded (talk) 11:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Gramicidin

message: The picture of Gramicidin A is incorrect (2 instead of 6 H-bonds between the monomers, and so on). 
How it has been generated? It should be replaced.Biophys 03:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was created in ChemDraw.  If you're so inclined to make another one, be my guest.  But it depicts the motif quite well, IMHO Jgassens 21:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the numbers of hydrogen bonds between the monomer and within each monomer are wrong (actually, there are more H-bonds). Do we need this picture when someone inserted a better and rotating one?Biophys 01:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why the picture has to rotate. And I don't know if it's a very good picture. Why is the molecule several times in there? This is just an artefact of the structure determination but it has no meaning for someone who tries to understand the structure. And why do you need to show the uncertainties? FelixP 16:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect picture

message: The first line of para "Pharmacological effects" reads :
'Gramicidin's bactericidal activity is a result of increasing the permeability of the bacterial cell wall allowing inorganic monovalent cations' 
Is it cell wall or cell membrane? I think it has to be cell membrane.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hbaryan (talk • contribs) 13:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  IT SHOULD BE 'CELL MEMBRANE' 

message: The references were moved to a separate section.Biophys 03:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References