Talk:Abu-Lu'lu'ah

message: ==Untitled==
It seems that we have different stories about the same person; Since his name was originally "Pirouz Nahavandi" then the title of article should be  "Pirouz Nahavandi"  not Abu-lu'lu'ah (which could be an offensive name). However the Abu-lu'lu'ah also should be written on the page so that every person with a background from each side of the story could find the article. Two sides of the story should be placed in one article. None of the content of these two should be deleted. --Sepahvand (talk) 04:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two articles should be merged with "Pirouz Nahavandi" name

message: It seems that we have different stories about the same person; Since his name was originally "Pirouz Nahavandi" then the title of article should be  "Pirouz Nahavandi"  not Abu-lu'lu'ah (which could be an offensive name). However the Abu-lu'lu'ah also should be written on the page so that every person with a background from each side of the story could find the article. Two sides of the story should be placed in one article. None of the content of these two should be deleted. --Sepahvand (talk) 04:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Truthpedia, your latest edits include material copied and pasted from this website. This is not a reliable source in any event, but copying and pasting material therefrom is in clear violation of policy. Additionally, it is inappropriate to refer to legitimate edits as "vandalism" in edit summaries.Proabivouac 01:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violations

message: Abu-Lu'lu'ah Al-Majousi was a Zoroastrian , not a shi'a . they shiite believe was not found yet in this period of history. Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 17:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  shi'a ? 

message: We seem to have two Wikipedia biographies of the same person and I therefore propose a merger of this article with Pirouz Nahavandi Jonathan Cardy (talk) 12:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to merge. They refer to th esame person. Both names could be included on the Pirouz page, as long as there are references. --DerRichter (talk) 02:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: merge with Pirouz Nahavandi

message: "All of these elements put together lead to the only logical conclusion that Pirouz was the Persian military commander at Nahavand that was captured by Mughira and brought back to Arabia, where these events took place."
I am not sure who wrote this article, but it needs to be rewritten.  --Nepaheshgar (talk) 11:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: OR

message: The resource for claiming that he was a shia muslim is very weak. At that time there were no shia/sunni muslim and imagin that how can we say a persian slave who assassinates muslim khalif was a muslim?! While we know that first Muslims adore their khalif as the prophet's successor! We are certain that Abu lulu or Piruz Nahavandi was persian and Zoroasterian before he was captured as a slave. Then he killed the great Muslim hero, Omar the second khalif who conquered the Empire of Persia. Is that difficult to guess what his belief was?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.71.127.41 (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoroastrian for sure