lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bix 7 Road Race

message: I don't think that the race being run virtually in 2020 needs to be in the header section. I propose deleting that orphan sentence and added a note/reference in the 'champions' table for the 2020 race. Gravel for breakfast (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race went virtual in 2020
Talk:Norman Whiteside

message: Not my expertise, but perhaps of interest to others, might be an auction, on 29th July 2020, by Ewbank’s Auctioneers, of the Norman Whiteside Football Collection (links: Ewbank’s; TheSaleroom). JDAWiseman (talk) 12:15, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auction: Ewbank’s Norman Whiteside Football Collection
Talk:List of Duke University people

message: Suggestion. I think it would be better and more in keeping with wp style to have the images of alumni moved down to the sections of the alumni in question. Also, more good images. --2604:2000:E020:9500:FDB7:4D97:97D:1781 (talk) 18:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: This list needs direct citations.  Per WP:UGC, a wikilink is not a WP:Reliable source. Toddst1 (talk) 12:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni

message: Per this reference, would it be reasonable to include a mentioned person on this list? It only mentions that the money from his development was enough to cover the full tuition, but doesn't mention actual attendance, only plans. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of [[Roblox]] game developer
Talk:Surrender

message: How about a split into surrender (military), and surrender (religion)? If I get no objection within one week then I'll go ahead. Andries 30 June 2005 20:17 (UTC)
*I assume you did it, seeing as how this is now a disambiguation page with links to both? --67.172.99.160 00:58, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled discussion by 67.172.99.160
Talk:Atmospheric dynamics

message: I am working on atmospheric sciences and noticed that the articles Atmospheric dynamics and Atmospheric physics exist.  Both are tagged as stubs, and the articles are the identical subjects  ->  dynamics = physics.  
My suggestion is to combine AD into AP and retain AP as the combined article, with AD as the redirector page to maintain any links...  -Hard Raspy Sci 06:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Countercurrent chromatography

message: If it needs a rewrite and is a copyvio, couldn't we just make note of the references and G12 speedy delete it? I think it would be easier to rewrite it that way per WP:TNT. RafChem (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the cleanup header since the issues have been addressed. Speedy G12 didn't apply due to non-infringing content.  --Kkmurray (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: I think this is better, although some parts still need clarification or elaboration from an expert. --AAMiller 30 June 2005 20:23 (UTC)
:It needs a big rewrite, it has been largely plagarised from this source: http://www.pharma-tech.com/theory1.htm -- Serephine ♠ talk - 11:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Entirely neglected,  should be added. 2601:246:C380:8930:2DD6:5258:4EC0:A64 (talk) 02:46, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoichiro Ito
Talk:Rope splicing

message: Any objection to deleting the list of splices now? I don't see how any of the splices will need their own articles since they'll probably never need more than a paragraph or two at the most. If they ever do need their own article, they could always be made and expanded later. For the same reason, I brought in the material from cunt splice and that could probably be deleted too. I'll at least get rid of the list article if no one has any good reasons not to. - Taxman Talk June 30, 2005 20:25 (UTC)
: Done. Dddstone 00:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also removed the splices category, as it only had eye splice and this article.--John.james 23:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: list of splices

message: I assume that cable splicing and rope splicing are similar enough to be dealt with in the same article. Is a long splice in rope the same as a logger would use to splice heavy steel cable?````LFlagg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LFlagg (talk • contribs) 00:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: cable splicing

message: The first image on the page, claiming to illustrate the "stages of splicing" should probably just be removed. What it illustrates is various stages of one rope being unraveled, with or without lashing, and really just serves to confuse the reader. At no point does it show a spliced rope 99.192.12.115 (talk) 02:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stages of Splicing image
Talk:Harlech

message: Why is the expulsion of Jews from Harlech in the late 1200's not mentioned? It's probably the most interesting thing to happen in that town since, well, ever! I'd happily edit it myself if I had any knowledge about it, but unfortunatley I don't. Can someone do something about it?
:The evidence for expulsion does not seem that clear. A quick search of Google throws up the following references, the last of which cast doubt on an actual expulsion:-
:*http://www.heretical.com/British/nsv12-3.html
:*http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gXcPi8ECW1YC&lpg=PA41&dq=jews%20harlech&pg=PA41#v=onepage&q=jews%20harlech&f=false
:*http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GKXbD-RiQ2oC&lpg=PA39&ots=KzZTXIiU6o&dq=jews%20harlech&pg=PA39#v=onepage&q=jews%20harlech&f=false
:::--Thozza (talk) 19:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, ".. exclusion, not expulsion clauses". But this is only Google, isn't it (?) Martinevans123 (talk) 21:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Expulsion of Harlech Jews
Talk:Agüeybaná I

message: If Diego Salcedo died in 1511, as per his entry, how did Agueybana rise into revolt and get shot in 1510 already? Did Agueybana revolt a year before Salcedo's death?
He died about 1509 or early 1510, alot of poeple confuse him the "Bishop" of the same name. Here's a reference by historian Ricardo Alegria as to what happeded:  "The Drowning of Diego Salcedo".  Tony the Marine 06:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the Arrival of the conquistadors section, it says that guaitiao means friends, and that Juan Ponce de León and Agüeybaná's wives exchanged names. Guaitiao is actually a Taíno ritual in which Juan Ponce de León and Agüeybaná exchanged their names, not their wives'. I will be correcting the error as soon as possible.Boricuaeddie 03:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrival of the conquistadors error 

message: I tnink this section should be renamed "legacy", as in other articles.Boricuaeddie 14:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honors 

message: Each of these two caciques had their own separate share of stories and, finally, their own legacy. I think the article should be split into two articles, one per individual. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article
Talk:Screen reader

message: The article mentions Narrator, but not the improved screen reading technology in Windows Vista.  Should this be addressed? -Hemidemisemiquaver 19:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update for Vista 

message: I've merged in some content from the Verbosity article.  I have no idea if any of this is worth keeping or not, feel free to do whatever is best with it.  --Xyzzyplugh 13:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Verbosity

message: Under the heading 'Web-based screen readers' there is an external link to texictalk.com named Talklets, which has recently explicitly changed to look like an internal link. Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis introduced this link on 6 February 2007, 12:58.
I think that Talklets should either be a link to a (new) Wikipedia-page, or entirely removed. An external reference to texictalk.com could be added to the reference section, when necessary.
Virtlink 15:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talklets 

message: Can anybody add anything about Android readers?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GhostInTheMachine (talk • contribs) 12:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Android? 

message: It would be great to have a section on current marketshare of the various screen readers, similar to the one over on the web browser page.  There was a WebAIM survey from 2014 that had some data on this, http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey5/#primary.  Would love more current data, as well as data for specific markets (i.e., do businesses or schools lean toward a particular commercial screen reader, whereas home users opt for one of the free ones?).  Is anyone aware of other surveys of this nature?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.139.225.194 (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketshare 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cabanehippopotamus (talk) 02:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu
Talk:Aimee Mann

message: The text says she was in Ministry but the Ministry wiki does not list her as either a member or former member. 162.216.108.203 (talk) 14:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean the Wikipedia page Ministry (band)? The Ministry article mentions Mann, and I've now added her to the list of former members on that page. Popcornfud (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ministry
Talk:Kristy Wright

message: As far as I have been able to discern, Kirsty Wright and Kristy Wright are the same person. Her name appears on the FHM 100 Sexiest Women in the World for 1998 and 1999, with Kirsty in '98 and Kristy in '99. I've also seen both in external references. — RJH 30 June 2005 21:08 (UTC)
Her name is K-R-isty, not K-I-rsty!
Kristy wright was voted in the Top 100 sexy soap stars  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.39.10 (talk) 09:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Colorist

message: colorist-video operator is mentioned in the virtual telecine article. I am not native speaker, I have not found the meaning in the web, by the context I can infer it refers to the person who operates a video device like a projector.
The colorist part may mean that he is also responsible to adjust the colors in the screen.
It seems that this combination "colorist video" is not frequently used, but looking for the term in the web, I found some people say they are colorist video, as some kind of skill.
As you can see, to not native speakers this term may be not very clear but one can approximately understand what is about.
Does this term deserves an entry in Wikipedia? 
Native speakers, you have a better answer than I.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias (talk • contribs) 19:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What is colorist-video?

message: I am ignorant of how comic books used to be colored -- and this section tells me exactly nothing. The idea of cutting out pieces of colored material seems absurd, simply because of the huge amount of labor required. The rest makes no sense. Someone should look at this and fix it. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 13:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It may sound absurd, but that is the way it was done. WaxTadpole (talk) 17:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: History section is confusing and seems incomplete

message: Hi...The incipit shows that English grammar is lacking :-/ Angelo.1961 (alias Big Beast) 12:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incipit
Talk:NASCAR Cup Series at Michigan International Speedway

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. No valid rationale provided. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 18:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: NASCAR Cup Series at Michigan International Speedway →  – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. Zrcook610 (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 December 2022
Talk:Chaotix

message: Please have someone besides the originating editor assess the article beyond C class. Thanks. Also, is this a fictional organization like Team Rocket or just a group of characters? Should the infobox be changed appropriately? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems closer to start class than anything. And while I won't personally push for it alone, I really don't think this would survive an AFD or merge discussion by WP:VG. The reception section is rather short, and mostly consists of passing comments pulled from article about other things, like their game reviews or comments about the series itself. It looks a lot like all the Sonic articles that were merged years back. Sergecross73 msg me 13:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This is my first character article, and I didn't really have another article to base it on, so I think that's why it doesn't look too good. However, I've looked back to the merger discussions from 2014 and I think that this is a different case. The IGN, Destructoid, and Sega Magazine articles are all about them, and there's a good deal of information I'm yet to implement. I'm tagging the reception section as incomplete for now, until I expand it. The reason I assessed it as a B-class article is because the creation and appearances sections are pretty good, but that's just my opinion. JOEBRO64 20:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Also, the Xbox World preview of Sonic Heroes has a page dedicated to them, if that helps. JOEBRO64 23:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I very much disagree that the article should be a start class article, it seems quite well written. If you can prove that it has notability, and I'd say from the sources that it does; then the article is well written. With it being a small topic, the information on offer seems to be quite large. In terms of a B class rating, I think it's between C and B, with the reception section just needing better wording for a B. The article rating system is designed for how well the information is displayed, and if the information is full. Not on the topic of the article. Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class assessment
Talk:Lists of moths

message: This article represents a small but brave step to list the moths of the world, which have an estimated 150,000 species described less the approximately 17,500 butterfly species . 
It needs major attention and is potentially the seed of Taxonomy of Moths in the making. A very important article for Wikipedia:WikiProject Lepidoptera.
AshLin 03:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be various Calpinae, probably of tribe Calpini. See also Calyptra and Hemiceratoides hieroglyphica, which do much the same and occur elsewhere. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

text: I propose to delete this gigantically incomplete list. Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Bump. There is no reason to have this list. There are so many moth species, the mere idea to include them all in a list is just insane. Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to improve this article

message: There was a strong sentiment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of moths that this article should be repurposed in some way. I would propose breaking out the existing sections of lists into separate pages to make this a list of lists, and clearly distinguishing the significance of such a list from the existing articles on Taxonomy of the Lepidoptera and Lists of Lepidoptera by region. bd2412 T 04:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've changed the lead to  to better reflect what the page now is. SpinningSpark 08:36, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repurposing
Talk:Tiple

message: added sources and resources for all of them.--4.250.63.183 22:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourced 

message: I googled up "trembulo" as well as the names of the luthiers given, found nothing.  I also googled "tiplito" and found nothing, and that instrument's description is even more generic to the point of being meaningless.  Does it just describe some type of tiple requinto?  The description sounds awfully like a tenor 8-string ukulele.  Unless someone has access to a reputable source proving notability, I submit those entries be deleted. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:39, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree that Trembulo should be removed as there are no sources to be found. Tiplito however does seem to have sources, even as merely a generic term for a small tiple. I think also that the Argentinian and Uruguayan tiples would be more accurately dfescribed as requinto guitars. Thoughts? Claireislovely (talk) 08:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But is tiplito actually worth listing separately as a distinct type of tiple as opposed to a simple description as "small"?  So far as the Argentine and Uruguayan:  it's not so much a matter of whether they are small guitars so much as whether they are generally known by the term timple.  If the Southerners actually just call them requintos and someone lumped them in here because they resemble tiples, they should be removed.  But if the average Argentine/Uruguayan musician calls them a tiple they should be retained. MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points, and I agree on both. More research is clearly needed. I like the idea of replacing the Tiplito bit with a short description simply describing it as a smaller tiple, but where should this go? Claireislovely (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Classifying hybrid instruments, particularly those in which the hybridization may have occured centuries ago, is always a challenge.  The trembulo and termbulo fusao are actually instruments in their own right.  They share a number of features with charangos and tenor ukeleles, but they also share features in common with tiples.  Since the information of the trembulo appears in the section headed "related instruments," I think it's appropriate to keep it there.  The trembulo is, indeed, quite likely related to the tiple.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.174.105 (talk) 00:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not seeing any notability for '''trembulo''' or '''tiplito'''
Talk:List of state partition proposals in the United States

message: There are clearly some proposals here that are more serious and some that are less. "Substantive" might be a good word to use here, instead of serious.
See California, Weld County, 2013 - it did not pass in enough counties but it was voted on and 5 counties approved it. That seems substantive.
But it seems to me that these could be removed:
* Tucson, February 2011 - this was never voted on, approved by, or accepted by any official entity.
* California, Huerfano County, 1930s - the Walsenburg World-Independent wrote about it. One state senator liked it. Enough said.
* California, Costilla County, 2973 - "expressed interest"? Really?
So, some of these could definitely come out. Do we want to create a "List of fanciful U.S. state partition proposals" page? Would probably be a good place to put some of these.
RayKiddy (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious Proposals, Yes? 

message: Should editorials by writers be seriously considered for this list, as with Florida and Georgia?  -AngusWOOF (talk) 13:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Short answer, no.  This list SHOULD BE limited to serious proposals only.  Something actually voted on by legislators, representatives, or the public would be one criteria.  Fanciful musings, editorials, or suggestions should only act as a secondary reference verification of a proven serious, voted-on proposal, if found reliable. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorials as proposals? 

message: I have proposed that Partition of States in the United States be merged with this article, as this one has a longer history and gives a more thorough look at the history of state partition proposals in the U.S. then the other article, which was created only last year (and has been left relatively untouched since), does. Also, everything in that article is also covered in this article. please join in the discussion here. Cheers. Drdpw (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Due to many, many proposals that are over 10+ or even 100+ years old that are here, I propose that this article be split into 2 articles:
• List of historical U.S. state partition proposals;
• List of current U.S. state partition proposals.
The split would split proposals which are less than 10 years old and more than 10yrs old. PortugueseWikiMan (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Or, we could limit what gets listed here to:</br>–proposals voted on by legislators or the public; or,</br>–proposals that received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.</br>Proposals and aspirations currently included that do not meet the criteria (however ultimately defined) would be removed. Drdpw (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split due to
Talk:Michael Lowenstern

message: This article is now expanded from its original one-sentence version.
'''
Micheal Lowenstern is the best bass-clarinetist alive today  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.15.232.122 (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Is it notable that Lowenstern - according to a video he made - is earning his living not by composing/playing music, but as a creative director for Amazon (see also this article). To be honest I don't know if that is relevant for en.wiki as my "home base" is de.wiki and I only found the article while looking for the bass clarinet player whose videos I like to watch on YouTube. --Samiclaus (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employment