lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Autoerotic fatality

message: I'm thinking this sould be merged with he AEA article. --70.48.219.198 07:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Could the death of Gareth Williams potentially be an autoerotic death, he was found naked in a bag locked from the outside, and the police say it’s not foul play. 75.139.2.180 (talk) 03:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The death of Gareth Williams 

message: Greetings.Several of the assertions in the paragraph are either unsupported by the sources, or lack sources, which makes the inclusion of David Carradine in this article unsupported.
-"there was evidence of a recent orgasm" is incorrect, the Fox article says, ""The two ropes were tied together," he [Lt. Gen. Chewprecha] said. "It is unclear whether he committed suicide or not or he died of suffocation or heart failure due to an orgasm."
-"two autopsies were conducted and concluded that his death was not suicide, and the Thai forensic pathologist who examined the body stated that his death may have been due to autoerotic asphyxiation" is incorrect, as Dr. Porntip Rojanasunan, who expressed that opinion, did not participate in the investigation, and, as the Fox article states: "Dr. Nanthana Sirisap, director of Chulalongkorn Hospital's Autopsy Center, told reporters that the autopsy was conducted because of the "unusual circumstances surrounding Carradine's death," but he [i.e. she] did not elaborate." The autopsy was conducted at that hospital.
-"Two of Carradine's ex-wives, Gail Jensen and Marina Anderson, stated publicly that his sexual interests included the practice of self-bondage," is irrelevant, as the ladies were not part of any investigation.
Thai police never released the results of the investigation.
Therefore, unless the final forensic report of the Thai police is found and cited, or there is a news article by a reliable source in which an officer of the Royal Thai Police identified by name and rank clearly states the manner of death as AEA, this paragraph is unsupported by the sources.
Thanks.Maykiwi (talk) 00:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed: The inclusion of David Carradine in this article is unsupported by the sources.
Talk:Police cadets in the United Kingdom

message: ----
Where does the Surrey department fit in underneath other departments? MPS 15:02, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This was meant to have been about Police Cadets but then goes on about Volunteer Police Cadets without mentioning the difference.
The whole article needs a re-write as its pointless to list Forces which do have such schemes in the way - whats wrong with a proper list?--Pandaplodder 16:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've made a start by completely re-arranging the material, and re-writing quite a bit of it. The two different concepts are now quite separate, but much more work is needed. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 22:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Badly written article 

message: The article is silent on this important topic. 81.158.1.158 (talk) 22:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why were they phased out in E&W? 

message: I've rewritten the lead section, admittedly not with much information but definitely in a less blatantly-advertising way than before. Safe to remove that particular warning?
StageMachiavel (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Section
Talk:Norman Geras

message: What was meant by the statement that Geras is "an opponent of the slaughter of western [sic] civilians"? Is this meant to imply that Geras condones the slaughter of non-Western civilians? Since this is a BLP there's no attribution for this view, I'm removing it until someone provides a source. --Gotophilk (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Opponent of the Slaughter of Western Civilians"

message: This article says nothing of Geras' erstwhile status as a Marxist. It appears that he is now an apostate, though nominally Marxist -- which the Economist thought good news. Is he experiencing a transitional period? It is worth noting that he supported the first imperialist assault on Iraq, which must be seen as a prelude to his loss of faith. -- mr9
:See Talk:Euston Manifesto#Norman Geras. In fact, I'll cut and paste the relevant text here:
::Norm insists that, whatever others call him, he is still a Marxist---and definitely not post-Marxist. He's probably better qualified than most people to judge this: what with his being a recognized expert on Marxism and his being Norman Geras. Counsell
:That comment comes from a friend of Prof Geras. (By Wikipedia rules, it cannot be used in an article, but it has the virtue of explaining Prof Geras's position quite clearly.) Cheers, CWC 10:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a Marxist

message: This article was in :Category:Trotskyists. I have removed it, as there don't seem to be any sources that support this allegation. If anyone can provide a source demonstrating that Professor Geras identifies as a Trotskyist, please do so; otherwise, the category should not be re-added. Robofish (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trotskyist? 

message: Word coming in that he's died. CulturalSnow (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RIP
Talk:Churchill Babington

message: he smoked weed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.3.133.173 (talk) 17:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did Churchill Babington take on an older relative when he wrote Mr [Thomas Babington] Macaulay's Character of the Clergy (1849)? Both were from Leicestershire families...
GianniBGood (talk) 14:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babington vs. Babington?
Talk:US Attacks on Other Countries

message: After reviewing the deletion policy, I realized that redirection was the appropriate response, not deletion. The content (other than China '45-'46, Indonesia '58, Guatemala '60, '64 and '67-'69,  and Peru '65 - none of which I know anything about) has already been merged to List of U.S. military history events. --Habap 15:43, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Ganghwa Island

message: Ngram and Google Scholar agree with all the content on the page that this location's   name is Ganghwa Island and not Ganghwado, Ganghwa-do, or Ganghwa Do, though all those names may occur in English contexts. The page needs to be returned to its proper location. — LlywelynII 09:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: These were identified as "references" for the article without any inline footnotes to explain what was being cited or where it was located within the work:
*.
*.
Kindly restore them once they are being used for inline citations. — LlywelynII 09:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sources"
Talk:Arithmetic precision

message: I have a question: how does this relate to false precision? Are these contradictory ? , 01:52, 8 August 2005(UTC)
:If you write down a number like 9.8132, you claim that it has five digits of precision, as explained here in precision (arithmetic). Now, if the real value is 9.8156, that claim is wrong, so that is called false precision. Does that answer your first question? I don't see which contradiction you refer to in the second question. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 12:26, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Relation to false precision

message: Surely 12.345 rounded to 1 decimal place is 12.3  not 12.4 as currently on the page?
--Mealogav (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: .  --Lambiam 07:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rounding error

message: Is there any convention when talking about the numbers after the point/comma in bases other than base 10? It has always seemed werid to me when I had to refer to decimal places in a binary or hexadecimal number (e.g. “11001001.101”). Is it just me or is that a widespread problem? Iago212 09:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that instead of "decimal point" in another base you would say radix point; I think by analogy you would say "radix digits" or somesuch. -- Beland (talk) 01:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decimal places in other bases
Talk:Nevada State Route 604

message: Is this page really necessary?  The information here is already covered under Las Vegas Strip.  Perhaps a redirect is all that is needed. SpikeJones 16:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessary? 

message: Ok, I see that Las Vegas Boulevard does not go all the way to Primm, completely, but rather, there is a discontinuation.  There is a Las Vegas Boulevard within Primm, but it does not join with the main route.  Google Maps shows this: Southern end of main route and Northern end of Primm route, as well as the extreme end near California border. --Geopgeop 13:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ending at Primm

message: This article needs to be re-written from south to north like other U.S. road articles. Also, the article on the Tropicana intersection could be merged into this article. —Scott5114↗ 20:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Ueno, Tokyo

message: Should this really be categorized under gay villages? Is Shinjuke 2 chome in Ueno?
:According to the Shinjuku ni-chōme, Tokyo article, this area is also considered a gay village. I'm leaving the category for now. It would be better to get more information here though. — coelacan — 22:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:category:gay villages]]
Talk:Paul Shane

message: Whilst the picture picture may be characteristic of some of his TV roles, couldn't we have something a bit more endearing if available somewhere? --wintonian talk 19:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profile image 
Talk:Blanca of Navarre

message: Blanca, daughter of Garcia VI, was so insignificant that I doubt whether she ever gets any meaningful article here. It would be better to refer to her at her husband's page Sancho III of Castile.
Therefore, the disambiguation should be reverted, as the Regent Blanca was sufficiently important and article titles with parentheses should be avoided. 62.78.104.129 17:10, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Interesting study of spread of a novelty throughout generations and countries....
when the female name Blanca/Blanche became in use in Western European culture?
After now perusing plenty of royal genealogies, I did not find any royal Blanche before the children of Garcia VI of Navarre and the Frenchwoman Marguerite d'Aigle where a daughter received that name. Perhaps it was a novel innovation, the word "white" translated into a beautiful name.
I do not doubt that there possibly were some Blanches before that. Possibly such was a name of some obscure noble family, and used only there. That's anyway a mechanism how a new name becomes frequent: it "belongs" to a family, one of their female descendants marry a sufficently important person (such as king), the name given to a daughter suddenly becomes fashionable and all sorts of vassals begin to give it to their daughters. (Could it be that the obscure family of Marguerite d'Aigle held that girl name among their passing "heirlooms"?)
Does anyone find any Blanche before the Navarrese royal family began in 12th century to spread it, through its daughters to a plentitude of West-European royals and princes??? 217.140.193.123 09:15, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanca
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Harry Potter task force/Images

message: This organisation of the photos into their respective categories is timely and wonderful. Kudos!
Tomhongs 07:36, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why thank you...pitty it'll all be deleted--drak2 08:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timely organisation 

message: Are there any specific things to edit in Wikiproject Harry Potter that doesn't involve Images? I'm rather useless at those. Duinemerwen 17:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: This project page is a little badly maintained. Some of the pages in the "need image" list already have pretty good images.
Who updates this page?
Duinemerwen 17:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance 

message: I just tagged a bunch of images as being in the scope of this project. I hope that helps.--CJ King 20:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taging images 

message: I added the Jo simpsons.jpg picture, but don't know where it was originally - any clues?  SkierRMH 06:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean its original title? Location on this project page? or location in Rowling's article?  John Reaves 06:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added image

message: The Voldemort page has way too many images. Anyone else think that at least :Image:HP5-TL2-0078.jpg and :Image:HP5-TL2-0079.jpg should be deleted?  As it stands, we pretty much have an example of every occurrence of Voldemort in the films. -Phi*n!x 03:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I think the page looks brilliant!  However, I'm not at all sure that WP:NFC would agree, so you're right - we should probably restrict ourselves to one image from each film.  More than one still from the Ministry or Graveyard scenes is, I agree, pushing it.  And those are the two images I'd select to lose from that page if I had to.  Happy-melon 07:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm bringing this discussion to the Voldemort discussion page. -Phi*n!x 00:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Voldemort Images

message: I'd like to re-add an image to the Harry Potter Trading Card Game article, but need help setting up the reasoning of the fair use. The picture I would be using is a scan from the back of a card I own. Put help on my talk page. Thks Mathman1550 (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trading card game image
Talk:Blanche of Navarre, Countess of Champagne

message: Please revert this back to Blanca of Navarre.
Besides, it is against Wiki etiquette not to bring the full history of the article when someone recently made the move of contents. 62.78.104.129 17:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why we don't know birth date, when the article says, that she was 22 in 1199 and 52 in 1229, what clearly shows she was born in 1077? I won't make changes however, because I have no access to sources, and these two sentences had no references. Also, it is not clear, if she died on March 13, 1229, like in the text (with no reference), or "c. 13 March 1229", like in the infobox. Pibwl ←« 15:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad

message: Is there a reason the logo says Railway? --SPUI (talk) 17:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Bridge (nautical)

message: The picture of Leao Dos Mares is missing. Thanks.  Djminisite -  Talk |  Sign 16:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leao Dos Mares 

message: This article already seems to cover some of the information from the Pilothouse article, and even mentions the term "wheelhouse" (a synonym for Pilothouse) in the lede, as if it is already part of the article.  Should Pilothouse's material be transferred here so the two terms can better be compared and contrasted? AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone considering the merger proposal immediately below should note that 'Pilothouse' now redirects to 'Bridge (nautical)'. Meticulo (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Pilothouse]] 

message: Should the Bridge wing article be merged into this one? Comments please. Meticulo (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. This definitely doesn't meet criteria for a seperate article. It should be merged into a section on the different parts of the bridge, including equipment, radio room etc.  LordHarris 18:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Merge. Bridge wing can be treated as part of the bridge. Tupsumato (talk) 09:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Merge. Bridge wing is not notable unto itself. Bring Navigation room here, too. See discussion at Talk:Navigation room#Merger proposal. User:HopsonRoad 15:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Please join the discussion at Talk:Navigation room#Merger proposal to decide whether that material should be brought across to this article. User:HopsonRoad 15:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal: [[Navigation room]]
Talk:Papal shoes

message: Shoes and slippers should NOT be merged but both listen as sub-categories under papal vestments!  Your problem, in the first place, was confusing the two, which lead someone to claim that Benedict XVI had restored the old papal slippers.
A.M.
:Why not just have one article on papal footwear? Breaking out into lots of small articles just makes it harder to find all the appropriate information. The fact that they're described in the same article doesn't mean the two matters have to be confused. --W(t) 17:43, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)
::The fundamental question seems to be: how encyclopedic is the subject per se?  The topic doesn't seem relevant or vast enough to merit its own, separate article.  Even the merged article is not that big, it would fit without problems as a section of a larger article.  In my humble opinion, the best way to go would be to have it in this more general article about papal vestments (do we have that?).  In an unrelated subject, please remember to use tildes (~~~~) to sign comments.  Regards, Redux 17:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Such a merge looks like a very good idea to me. I might do it if I get round to it. The image of the slippers and gloves (on slippers) is missing source and copyright information. It shouldn't be used Zeimusu | (Talk page) 00:23, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: A Carthusian monk, all of whom wear only white habits, refused to change his garments starting the trend I believe,
Worth some research perhaps.
Deacon Candidate Brandon Justice, SFO  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.39.142.2 (talk) 12:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double check Papal color cahnge to white 

message: I am surprised to see no mention of the footwear associated with the current occupant of the see. --Haruo (talk) 16:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shoes of the Argentinian 

message: Etruscan and Roman priests wore red shoes. Surely the Church's explanation is covering for something—the red color of priestly shoes in Italy is older than Christianity by hundreds of years.72.68.108.107 (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the explanation of the color
Talk:Catalogue of Women

message: I've fixed some HarvErrors, but the following short citations are still invoked with no corresponding full citation:
*Davies 1988
*Marcksheffel 1840
*Renner 1977
*West 1965
*Cigano 2009
*Fowler 1999
– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try to find the sources behind these citations and add full references for them to the bibliography. It may take me a while, though, and I may not be able to find all of them. --Katolophyromai (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation errors
Talk:Say What You Will, Clarence... Karl Sold the Truck

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 21:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Hang Time (album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 17:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Let Your Dim Light Shine

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 19:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: There's a line that was added in 2006, by an editor that is no longer active and had some vandalism issues, and has no citation: "Dim Light was the least favorite album of the band, as Columbia, their label at the time, constantly interfered with their creative process."
As this has been uncited for the past 9 years, and google searches only turn up sources that are all dated after this line being added, it seems like this is WP:OR that has been repeated online. I'm removing it. Rockypedia (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Least favorite"??
Talk:Pokémon Contest

message: I have moved this page because "contest" should be capitalized no more than any normal word, cheers M inun   (Spiderman)  21:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I was wrong (I think) M inun   (Spiderman)  21:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page
Talk:Jeff Purvis

message: this edit changed a date in this article.  The author has made constructive edits, but he has also vandilized articles.  I know nothing about the subject, so someone else please verify. Scott Ritchie 18:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the date is accurate. However it should be removed due to redundancy, and I will change it. --D-Day  Somebody talk to me. Please somebody! Anybody! 18:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicious date change 
Talk:Robot Hive/Exodus

message: What does this have to do with the Gullah people?...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.244.7.58 (talk) 04:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

message: *Just a small little factoid, but "10001110101" is binary for a question mark (?). ;) --G VOLTT 22:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  10001110101 

message: *I think this is most likely a reference to Rush's song "The Temples of Syrinx" Viper Daimao 17:31, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Temples of Syrinx