Talk:Cerastes cerastes

message: "The average length is 30-60 cm"
Um, I don't mean to be pedantic but how can a range be an average? Is there a more encyclopaedic way to word this? Brendan Hide (talk) 11:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this will explain things for you: Range (statistics). --Jwinius (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Sure, link to photos, but it may be a very similar species like Cerastes gasperettii or Pseudocerastes_persicus_fieldi, both of which are horned and native to Jordan. HCA (talk) 14:15, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

text: There should be an "upload file" link on the lefthand side of your screen. HCA (talk) 14:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

text: Top of the page, in "preferences", there will be an option to send an email to the address you registered with, allowing you to confirm your account. HCA (talk) 14:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

text: OK, so I did some research, dug up the species description, and the bad news is that these species can't be distinguished on the basis on images alone.  The distinction is based on counting the number of ventral scales, as well as subtleties from head scalation.  C. cerastes has 139-149 ventrals in males and 143-151 ventrals in females, while C. gasperettii males have 154-162 ventral and females have 153-172.  Basically, in order to distinguish them, you'd need to take them to a museum.  However, I wouldn't recommend this, as the leading cause of snakebite is people trying to capture the snake.  At the end of the day, they're not visually distinguishable to anyone but a professional.  Based on range, I suspect yours is C. gasperettii, but only a museum can tell for sure. HCA (talk) 17:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: How can a range be an average?

message: An image used in this article, File:My cerastes with her eggs.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:My cerastes with her eggs.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:My cerastes with her eggs.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cerastes cerastes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060613042050/http://plumed-serpent.com/dscour.html to http://www.plumed-serpent.com/dscour.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At this writing, the "Venom" section says C. cerastes venom is not very toxic, and it also says [a]n estimated lethal dose for humans is 40–50 mg.
That sounds pretty toxic to me.  It's in the same ballpark as the lethal dose for cyanide, though perhaps not by the same mode of administration.
Missing is any indication of how much venom is delivered in a typical bite, so I can't judge the lethality of a bite from the information given.  But even if a typical bite is not very likely fatal, it still doesn't seem correct to say that the venom is "not very toxic".  And of course if it is likely fatal, then saying that just looks reckless. --Trovatore (talk) 02:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "not very toxic"