Talk:Daylight

message: This page really should be at Daylight. I've fixed the disambiguation and links to make this possible. Admin please move the page.--Srleffler 18:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I assume this is refering to recreating daylight in terms of lux?  ...because recreating it's temperature is already possible...
Anyway, if that's the case, maybe that should be clarified in the article.. TerraFrost 00:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  artificial daylight 

message: Is Daylight the right place to describe sunlight intensity in the Solar System? It just seems a little odd, even if we can speak of daylight on other planets, to have a detailed examination here and a bare mention at sunlight. I think the table etc should be merged there, with a briefer mention and  in its place here, keeping things here more terrestrial. I've merge tagged the section, anyway.--mikaultalk 12:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the author of that section, I agree wholeheartedly. I am now moving the table. --Cyclopia (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Daylight#Daylight intensity in the Solar System|Daylight intensity in the Solar System]] 

message: The table of the planets' sunlight intensity is out of date, as it mentions Pluto as being a planet whereas it is now in fact classed as a dwarf-planet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.Help (talk • contribs) 19:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 

message: I deleted the image from time.gov (showing the terminator in Jan), because it is incorrect. It shows light symmetrically divided between the two hemispheres. However, at that time of year (Northern winter), there should be a band at the top (around the north pole) that light does not reach into, and at the bottom (around the south pole) there should be a band in continuous light. Compare to the websites at http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Earth or http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/earthview.php, which generate correct images. Wingedsubmariner (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad image from time.gov 

message: The Daylight article reads "10,000 - 25,000 lux Typical overcast day, midday", but the LUX article states "1,000 lux Overcast day; typical TV studio lighting". What is correct? The two articles differ by more than a factor 10!
http://books.google.at/books?id=tTswvXBDBHkC&pg=SA35-PA37&dq=overcast+lux&hl=de&ei=ZwLJTZeJMcmVOoCLjccH&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=overcast%20lux&f=false gives a table (Table XIX), where the illumination of the overcast sky depends on the latitude. Based on such information I guess the Lux articel should also give a range and not a fixed value. The Daylight article should probably extend the low range for overcast to 5,000 lux instead of 10,000 lux. But these are just assumptions from an unexpierenced person, named Michilans (talk) 09:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Early-June this year, in Seattle, on a very heavily overcast and rainy day, my lux meter showed about 10k. Some less severe overcast days have shown closer to 20-25k. I do believe that the 1-2k estimate currently shown is far too low. Mortrek (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different luminance for overcast within Wikipedia 

message: In some filmmaking locations, such as Sweden, there is too much light due to long summer days. As a result, in films like Marianne, night scenes have to be shot during the daylight hours and digitally altered later.
I removed this since it isn't about daylight as much as about movie-making with excess daylight. PErhaps move it to "day for night"? Mang (talk) 20:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed night filming paragraph 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Daylight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071001021226/http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/623/4/1018 to http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/623/4/1018
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daylight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070602190451/http://www.rics.org/Property/Propertymanagement/Easements/Rightstolightdetermination/ to http://www.rics.org/Property/Propertymanagement/Easements/Rightstolightdetermination
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This Wikipedia article : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonlight state that moonlight have at most 0.1lux please discuss with each other and provide the correct version 183.182.111.149 (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in moonlight illumination