lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tsona

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per WP:CONSISTENCY with County-level cityother county-level cities, and per the arguments below. (closed by non-admin page mover) MaterialWorks (contribs) 01:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tsona County →  – Originally I believe that such move won't be controversial as not only officially announced, but also adopted by several reliable sources, but a user reverted my move and later, explained their own rationale that why it's controversial, so far let's start a move request instead. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Support. (I will use quotation marks for the names of the types of administrative divisions as I refer to the governmental classification) I am completely shocked by Kautilya3's erratic and problematic understanding on WP:RMUM and WP:OFFICIAL. Among all the things that need to be considered, the only major one is whether "Tsona" is currently a "county" or a "(county-level) city", and the answer is obvious that it is currently a "(county-level) city", and it does not matter that whether it is determined by a source in what language. So let me make the currect situation clear: "Tsona" is currently not a "county" at all (which has been announced and implemented by the government), but Kautilya3 considered it as "still a 'county'", which contradicts to the actual situation. If the current naming itself is erratic and can lead to misunderstanding (for this case calling an administrative division which is currently not a "county" at all as a "county"), the change of the article name is not the matter about WP:OFFICIAL and WP:UCRN, but the matter about WP:5P1 instead. Sanmosa Outdia 00:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, I consider Kautilya3's remark that "you people appear to be new to English Wikipedia and perhaps new to the English language itself" offensive, as it is also obvious that all of us here use fluent English for communications, and of course we know the differences between a "county" and a "(county-level) city". I have received compulsory English education for 12 years, so I definitely need not a translator to read what Kautilya3 has written, and I find it terrifying for a person nearly not knowing anything about Chinese administrative divisions at all claiming people knowing Chinese administrative divisions more than him "not knowing things about (Chinese) administrative divisions". Sanmosa Outdia 00:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Comment: Nearly all article about county-level city (see ) do not have a "County" suffix. If the consensus is to keep the original title here, it seems there are dozens of articles that need to be renamed. BlackShadowG (talk) 12:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 April 2023
Talk:Krystyna Zachwatowicz

message: *  Portrety: Krystyna Zachwatowicz Anna Bugajska, Gazeta Wyborcza Kraków, 17 maja 2005
*  filmpolski.pl
*  Stary Teatr w Krakowie
*  Krystyna Zachwatowicz, dekoracje i kostiumy, Katalog wystawy Muzem Starego Teatru, Kraków 1988
*  Krystyna Zachwatowicz, Album ze wstępem J. Walaszek, Warszawa 1992
*  IMDB
* See also References section for more
—Visor (talk • contribs) 21:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further references
Talk:Lochinver

message: Is this true? I haven't been there for a long time so it's clearly grown a lot in recent decades but a source would still be useful here.--JBellis 21:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: second largest fishing port in Scotland
Talk:Mainling

message: In your revert actions, you more-overly kept the current "County" statement, even zh name has kept in , I'd love to know why? Is office announcement even unreliable now? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Again? Still a county? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus at Talk:Tsona#Requested move 9 April 2023 and per the arguments below. (closed by non-admin page mover) MaterialWorks (contribs) 01:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mainling County →  – Originally I believe that such move won't be controversial as not only officially announced, but also adopted by several reliable sources, but a user reverted my move and later, explained their own rationale that why it's controversial, so far let's start a move request instead. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

text: (It is the same thing from Talk:Tsona County) Support. (I will use quotation marks for the names of the types of administrative divisions as I refer to the governmental classification) I am completely shocked by Kautilya3's erratic and problematic understanding on WP:RMUM and WP:OFFICIAL. Among all the things that need to be considered, the only major one is whether "Tsona" is currently a "county" and a "(county-level) city", and the answer is obvious that it is currently a "(county-level) city", and it does not matter that whether it is determined by a source in what language. So let me make the currect situation clear: "Tsona" is currently not a "county" at all (which has been announced and implemented by the government), but Kautilya3 considered it as "still a 'county'", which contradicts to the actual situation. If the current naming itself is erratic and can lead to misunderstanding (for this case calling an administrative division which is currently not a "county" at all as a "county"), the change of the article name is not the matter about WP:OFFICIAL and WP:UCRN, but the matter about WP:5P1 instead. Sanmosa Outdia 00:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Support. Mainling is now a city. A city is never formally referred to as a county in China regardless if it is county-level or prefecture-level. Midperson (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 April 2023
Talk:Beecher family

message: With regards to WP:COI, I am a descendant of the Beecher family and my contributions are open to debate. I am certain that I have been neutral and appropriate. –Parhamr 21:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full disclosure… 

message: Family trees are not supposed to be indiscriminate lists of everybody but instead should be the persons who fit the notability test. This tree needs a check for such notability. —Parhamr 00:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To-do 

message: Persons possibly related to these Beechers:
*Franny Beecher (1921–), born in Norristown, Pennsylvania
*John Beecher (1904–1980), born in New York City to a Steel Industry Executive
*Philemon Beecher (1776–1839), born in Oxford, Connecticut, the son of Abraham Beecher and Desire Tolles
*Lt. Fredrick H. Beecher of the 3rd Infantry (nephew of Henry Ward Beecher and veteran of the Battle of Gettysburg) (see also: Beecher Island)
*Gordon Beecher (b. January 19, 1904, Baltimore, Maryland; d. December 7, 1973)
*Michael Beecher (born Michael Becher November 20, 1939, died 1994, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia)—possible English exile to penile colony?
*Henry K. Beecher
*Edmund Beecher Wilson (1856–1939), born in Geneva, Illinois
*Henry Beecher Dierdorff (b. 1851 – d. 1935)
*Arthur Beecher Carles (1882–1952)
===Locations===
*Beecher Island (yes)
*Beecher Park (unknown)
*Beecher Creek (unknown, related to Beecher Park)
===Municipalities===
*Beecher, Michigan (unknown)
*Beecher, Wisconsin (unknown)
*Beecher City, Illinois (unknown)
===Events===
*Battle of Beecher Island
—Parhamr 00:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related 

message: *Battle of Beecher Island
—Parhamr 00:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Events

message: There is also a Beecher disambiguation page on Wikipedia. The two should probably be merged somehow. As this page deals mostly with the family of Lyman Beecher, perhaps this family tree should be moved to his own page. The27thmaine (talk) 00:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beecher and Beecher Family 
Talk:Sassetti Chapel

message: Translation form it:Cappella_Sassetti (GFDL reuquires attribution) --Sailko 21:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs some improvement as some of the interpretation is lacking evidence.  Also, there is very little mention of the patron's role in this work.  It should be noted that Ghirlandaio's 'interpretation' of the life of St. Francis differs dramatically from that of Giotto and other established precedents.  It was very bold of Ghirlandaio to break tradition in this way and shows the influence of his patron in choosing the stories of St. Francis' life to be depicted.  The entire of life of St. Francis was been 'subverted' to serve the interests and status of the patron, and I think the article needs to reflect this more.  The section on 'Resurrection of the Boy' needs to be supported by references since I don't think it is very accurate. The current consensus among scholars is that this fresco is a tribute to the sons lost by Sassetti.  Also a list of books/articles should be added. I've done some research in this area and will attempt to clean up the article in time. --KeithatET 01:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Anti-life

message: I've changed the redirect of this page to pro-choice. I have also redirected anti-choice to pro-life. I believe this balances any NPOV concerns. Neitherday 21:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page should stay a dab, not a redirect, as implied by consensus at pro-death discussion. JJB 08:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Joe Baksi

message: Joe Baksi has been used in cockney rhyming slang for a taxi for decades now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.176.105.39 (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I wonnder if it originated from the Woodcock fight--Work permit 18:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture and joe baksi
Talk:Anti-choice

message: I've changed the redirect of this page to pro-life. I have also redirected anti-life to pro-choice. I believe this balances any NPOV concerns. Neitherday 21:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anti-life now hits a disambiguation page so the NPOV concerns are back. Also, somewhere along the line, this page was made to redirect to the United States pro-life movement which makes little sense. Abortion rights groups in many English speaking countries use the term "anti-choice". This should once again link to a discussion of the terminology itself. I am not at all convinced by the December 2011 discussion which only had two replies. If I had been aware of the discussion at the time I would've said that such indiscriminant redirecting serves to spread misconceptions. Connor Behan (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonetheless, you cannot override the result of a discussion simply because you disagree. If you think this should target elsewhere, begin a new discussion.  –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Changing things you disagree with is part of WP:BOLD. However, now that the edit has been disputed, a new discussion is definitely the way to go :). Connor Behan (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:WLTN-FM

message: I was driving through the New Hampshire North Country the other day and I had my radio locked to WLTN-FM and noticed that at the top of every hour, they were now airing CBS Radio Network News (just as they do over on their co-owned station, WXXS-FM). They even featured a promotional advertisement of WLTN Radio's newly-found affiliation with the CBS Radio Network. Although I don't have any non-refutable evidence that this switch has occurred, I can certainly tell you from first-hand experience that this change HAS taken place and is applicable to WLTN Radio as a whole (meaning that both WLTN-FM and WLTN-AM are affected by this latest change). I thank you for your time and would appreciate your attention to this latest update here.
98.229.132.126 (talk) 20:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WLTN-FM and WLTN-AM Traded In IRN USA Radio Network For CBS Radio Network News
Talk:Triangular tiling

message: This paragraph is puzzling, and its relation to the charts could be more explicit.  If four are Wythoff and two are not, what of the other three?  Are the four a subset of the seven?
In the context of coloring, does Wythoff construction mean an assignment of colors to distinct regular polygons, or more broadly any pattern based on decoration of a fundamental triangle (or odd-even pair)? —Tamfang (talk) 07:11, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wythoff colorings
Talk:Egba people

message: Are these terms synonomous? What is the difference? How are they pronounced? It seems like they may just be separate romanizations for the same word.
Thecurran 22:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yewa=Egba 

message: This should be added to the article. 105.112.120.116 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fela Anikulapo Kuti was also an Egba
Talk:Rutog County

message: The obvious answer is Hotan Prefecture  (then called 和田专区) but Rutong is not mentioned on these pages    where you might expect to see it mentioned. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What prefecture was Rutog part of between 1961 and 1978? 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  00:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Devereux Glenholme School

message: I have deleted this article to remove the copyright violations, and created a stub in its place.  Please expand the article.  Text taken from the school Web site is not permissible here and will be removed on site.  Thanks --Spike Wilbury  17:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio deleted 

message: Apparently this school used to treat homosexual kids. See Peter Wyden and Barbara Wyden, Growing Up Straight: What Every Thoughtful Parent Should Know about Homosexuality (New York: Stein and Day, 1968) 98-99. --zenohockey (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you like to tell the rest of us what it was that you read in that book? --Orlady (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuals 

message: This school has recently accepted more and more students diagnosed with aspergers syndrome. This has unfortunatly lead to the school beeing kn own for those students. However the majority of the students are there for behavioral reasons.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.88.58.186 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspergers 
Talk:Cloud Nine

message: US Weather Bureau. The story is that this organization describes (or once described) clouds by an arithmetic sequence. Level Nine was the very highest cumulonimbus, which can reach 30,000 or 40,000 feet and appear as glorious white mountains in the sky. So if you were on cloud nine you were at the very peak of existence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.38.145.103 (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Welkin is perhaps an etymological origin for some systemization in Anglo-Saxon culture containing nine heavens, the ninth being the highest. Nagelfar (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Term origins

message: I removed the link to Nobody Loves You (When You're Down and Out) by John Lennon. It contains a reference to "cloud 9" in the lyrics but I don't think the song itself has ever been called that. Danceswithzerglings (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lennon

message: There is no page on Wikipedia on Tobu, so I linked to his website. Jamdor (talk) 06:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  7obu external link 

message: The esports organisation appears twice, in both the "Companies" section and the "Other Uses" section. Should we remove one of the references?
Robojackal (talk) 10:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esports Twice 

message: Cloud nine in the Atlas was an final question and answer in an episode of "Jeopardy!".2001:8003:1C0E:0:7CF0:CE8C:8307:3E7F (talk) 06:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meteorological Atlas 1896
Talk:Justus Ward

message: I recommend pruning down the list of relationships here, per guidelines at WP:SOAPS. --Elonka 21:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many relationships
Talk:Calchfynydd

message: : When Calchfynedd existed, Powys extended much farther east (holding pretty much all Cornovii territory). At this largest extent, most of the West Midlands would have been under Powysian authority, and Northampton and Dunstable would have been close enough from it for them being south of Powys to not be an vacuous truth.
: You should rather have created the talk page and put a tag; editors are likely to react to tags, and if they do so, they'll be more likely to react positively than if the edit is perceived as vandalism.
: If you intend to reply to this, you might have a swifter response if you answered on my talk page
: 69.156.206.195 21:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was a little sceptical when tagging this one with , but did so when I saw it was in :Category:History of Buckinghamshire. If it is part of the history of Buckinghamshire, it's covered by WP:BUCKS. If that category has been added as "it might be", or it might be somewhere else, then the categorisation needs to be cleaned up as it's misleading. Thoughts? SeveroTC 22:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see any justification for that category. It was also (until a moment ago!) in :Category:History of Bedfordshire, :Category:History of Hertfordshire and :Category:History of Oxfordshire! Truth is we just don't know for sure where exactly it was, as I tried to make clear in the article. Sorry for the abrupt edit to your tag, and hope that helps clear things up. Enaidmawr (talk) 22:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh, that's cool... certainly reading the article, even if it was in the same area, the two entities aren't connected at all. Thanks for sorting that one out! SeveroTC 22:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Buckinghamshire
Talk:Gang of 500

message: Propose merge into The Note (ABC News). Wikipedia is not a dictionary and the term is only used in reference to Halperin and The Note. Propose that this term be defined where it appears in the entry for The Note. --WWB 22:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I object. This phrase is used fairly broadly in the liberal and general blogosphere to refer to washington insiders who set the conventional wisdom (and enable the Bush administraton)
A recent article on salon which uses the phrase and does not refer to The Note at all:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/07/25/gonzales/index.html
Litch 18:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge
Talk:Pineville, Louisiana

message: This page needs a total overhaul. 1st I'd provide a picture of Pineville from the Alexandria side that shows the river. That would be far more appealing than a picture of the "downtown" that few go to.
2nd the notable people reads like it was a bunch of locals who make it up and put cousin billy bob on the list. Seriously a real estate developer is a famous person? This might have to be edited by me to reduce some of the riff raff.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.87.8 (talk) 06:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Black Corinth

message: new at this sorry missed of my name or are there other problems --Collins83 22:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You deleted the speedy delete tag on this article when you added the hangon tag, although as I said on your talk page, I would have deleted the speedy tag myself. I did delete your signature and the hangon tag. If TREYWiki disagrees with the removal of the speedy, he can post his issues here. One question, is this the same grape as the one in Zante currant? I get that impression from the text. If so, we should probably look at merging the two articles. - Fordan (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy?
Talk:Lecompte, Louisiana

message: "65.19% of all married couples consisted of first cousins who married one another or married siblings."
This just scans clumsily to me, implying all sorts of possibilities, but I can't think of how to gracefully fix it. Any ideas?
Also, so far I can't find this particular statistic on the census website.
Shari 16:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement was vandalism that was added on Nov 16 2006 and never removed.  I just took it out.  VerruckteDan 19:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics: Wording and Accuracy
Talk:Woodworth, Louisiana

message: As I find more and more history of the town, it may begin getting unorganized as every day I am finding additional sources telling deeper and deeper important history of the town. For those who actually edit this, it'd be helpful if you put the history things in sequential order when I don't do it myself. Also, if you notice any grammar mistakes I made in my edits, feel free to correct them.  x (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Mêdog County

message: The contents of the two sections are redundant and mostly unintelligible. I've moved the texts here, in case someone can do a copyedit (see the commented out Wikitext below). Esiymbro (talk) 03:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Religion" and "officials" section