Talk:Spider-Man (1994 TV series)

message: This article is really badly named, since its subject was called Spider-Man, not Spiderman: The Animated Series.
That said, I'm leaving decisions about the correct title/disambiguation to someone more thoughtful than myself, since there are also three other animated TV series called Spider-Man...
—Paul A
There is some sloppy grammar in this article. I'll fix it later, but anyone else with a keen editor's eye should feel free to pitch in.
: Thats because I wrote it..sorry :( - UnlimitedAccess 08:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this section from the article because
1. It falls under Wikipedia's "weasel words" rule
2. I'm pretty sure i've seen another animated Spider-man series that was actually a literal translation of the early comics to cartoon format, which would obviously be truer to source anyway.
Well, which one? The older Spiderman-Shows didn´t have many continuos storylines.77.13.141.28 (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The show is generally considered by fans to be the most true to source" 

message: Someone added this to the main Spider-Man page.  I removed it because it didn't belong there but maybe someone can make use of it here.  -- HKMARKS 16:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: I really don't think there should be separate articles on every episode. Maybe they should be incorporated into something like List of Season # episodes in Spider-Man: The Animated Series. What do you think? May the Edit be with you. T-borg (drop me a line) 17:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. A lot of TV series are starting to have episodes created, so I don't see why Spiderman can't. Just because it is not as big as say Desperate Housewives, Prison Break (and all those that have all their episode pages), it doesn't mean it cant have episodes created. Davey4 05:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Episode Articles 

message: Good God, what is with this section? They're supposed to be summaries, not play-by-plays! --Shay Guy 19:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret Wars 

message: Do you think it's a good idea to have separate article for the episodes section, since the episode section is half the size of the entire article.Gman124 01:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the Episodes section to Spider-Man (1994 animated series) Episode List because it was really long and took up half the pageGman124 21:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate Article for Episode Section

message: I haven't seen this in a while, but isn't it accurate that in the series, Spider-Man casts webs using little cylinders in this suit. Whereas in the movies, and possibly comics, Spider-Man can sling webs from inside him.
That was one of the major plays of the series that stopped Spider-Man pursuing and finishing off villians with a coup de grace - he'd often make reference to almost being out of web.
Someone confirm this/add it to the article? 
58.107.150.168 12:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always thought that his webs were created by Peter Parker and not by the radioactive mutation, but I had based this off this TV show. A friend mentioned the same difference when the first movie came out, but I'm not sure whether he got this from the comics or not. Either way, I think a more general section detailing differences from the comics and the show would be a good idea. --Snaxe/fow (talk) 01:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Absolutely.  There was a brief time (between Spider-Man: The Other and Spider-Man: Brand New Day) when comic Spidey had organic webshooters, but for the majority of the time since his creation he's had mechanical ones. Planewalker Dave (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction with the comics/movies 

message: How did it become known as Spider-Man: The Animated Series? This title was never used in any of the episodes, and I haven't seen it in any promotional material either. It also isn't mentioned at all on the IMDb page (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112175/). Perhaps it was only referenced this way by fans who were also familiar with Batman: The Animated Series, which used that title frequently in promotional material and is mentioned on its IMDb page (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103359/). - 74.119.205.19 23:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather late, I know, but I think it is sorta related to Batman: TAS. That series started a whole new wave of animated series based on comic book characters, and the fact is, the cartoons were simply referred to by their superhero name (Spider-Man, Batman, Superman, X-Men). Later, Batman was identified as Batman: TAS, with Superman then named as such. I'm not sure whether Marvel or the animation studios ever referred to them as Spider-Man: TAS or X-Men: TAS, but they're commonly referred to as such to distinguish it from other X-Men and Spider-Man cartoons (I'm thinking mainly of the 60s Spider-Man cartoon, which as far as I know was also simply called Spider-Man). Plus, when reruns have aired on Jetix, I have heard them say "Spider-Man: The Animated Series." Anakinjmt 17:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also known as... 

message: :Image:Spider-Man- TAS Characters.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Spider-Man- TAS Characters.jpg

message: The first bullet point in the censor ship article is about the lack of words relating to "death" in later episodes. I just finished watching the first episode, "The Lizard". Kurt's wife asks "Kurt! Is he...?", leading me to believe that the avoidance of such words started from the beginning of the series. The section definitely needs more references if it's true at all. --Snaxe/fow (talk) 13:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: This has nothing to do with improving the article, but f*ck it, how much of the arguments on the talk pages honestly do. 
Are you guys sh*tting my d*ck off with this section?! I had no idea Fox was training kids to be unrealistic, delusion clowns for years. I was a Marine recruit instructor in the late 90s to early 2000s and this explains why so many of the recruits were borderline retarded about the real world. 
I for one am happy that entertainment has gradually evolved from Happy Days and Saved By The Bell to The Dark Knight, Watchmen, and Saw. Even moronic shows like Jersey Shore show a glipse of reality in comparison. Everyone should take a glipse of what the real world is like outside of the suburbs, and what life is like for thoese less fortunate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.86.230.202 (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship Section 

message: The premise for that section, that the show was intentionally censored to stop the show from being banned in some countries, is based on , which is not at all a reliable source.  As such, we have no reliable, verified evidence that show was "censored"; or that if it was censored, the censorship was unusual; or even if it was unusual, the reasons behind the censorship. Furthermore, the "exceptions" were original research, based on collecting what one or more editors thought were "notable" exceptions to the policy.  In one respect, the large list of exceptions makes me question the censorship in the first place.  In any event, without reliable sources to support this, it needs to stay out of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "censorship" section 

message: From the article: "The entire series is currently available for instant streaming on Netflix."
Are the episodes on Netflix the originals, or the ones censored/edited by Disney later on? Josh (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I remember it's the originals Sean 22:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netflix 

message: This template should be removed, as the Marvel Animated Universe does not exist. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 00:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvel Animated Universe 

message: There is a live action fan-film in production, known as "The Search for Mary Jane Watson: the Lost Episode" set for release in June 2012, theirs a trailer for it online. Its based off the abandoned season 6 story featuring Spider-man searching through time for Mary Jane and battling Carnage. I saw a section for it a while ago, but it was deleated. I really think it should be included, it lets people know how popular the series STILL is, and it gives information to fans who want to see it. It should at least be included in the "Reception Section" or a "Legacy Section" You can find more information about it at influencefilms.com/spiderman.cfm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.4.248 (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  add "The Search for Mary Jane Watson: the Lost Episode" fan-fim to article 

message: Anyone know what the message said, I mean the vulgar one not the other in the article. I really wanna know cause it's weird thinking a show I watched as a 4-6 year old had vulgar messages in it. Sean 22:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Smith message 

message: The 2000-2001 games, Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2: Enter Electro, although share voice casts from The animated series and Unlimited, it's not based on the show. The games are more like a "Mythology Pastiche" of characters. Venom is a more friendly and dumb-downed version. Electro and Captain America are trapped together with the Red Skull in the series and Electro had a different suit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.180.118.122 (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000 Video games 

message: The instrumental theme song for the series (including the lyrics) was performed by Joe Perry of Aerosmith.
Err, what? If it is an instrumental, it doesn't have lyrics, no?
Also, this is implying that 'Joe Perry performed the lyrics'. You don't perform lyrics. You write lyrics, you perform vocals. Which is this supposed to be saying he did? -Joey- (talk) 23:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme song 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Spider-Man (1994 TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514224707/http://marvel.toonzone.net/spideytas/semperinterview4.htm to http://marvel.toonzone.net/spideytas/semperinterview4.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130119203250/http://www.comics-db.com/Marvel_Comics/S/Spider-Man/Spider-Man_Adventures/index.html to http://www.comics-db.com/Marvel_Comics/S/Spider-Man/Spider-Man_Adventures/index.html
*Added  tag to http://www.clearvision.co.uk/product.cfm?prod_id=MAR1023
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.foxkids.com/spidrman.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Every few months he drastically edits the Reception section (for the worse) without valid reason, he doesn't add any sources or refute any points to the existing information that has been added and agreed on by countless other users. He's also a confirmed biased fanboy for a "rival" Spider-Man tv series The Spectacular Spider-Man, which can be proven by his countless and incredibly lengthy laughably over-inflated hyperbolic fanboy edits to that shows page. Enough already. Protect the page from pathetic biased fanboy trolls like this or specifically ban him completely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.110.123 (talk) 14:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone ban this pathetic troll fanboy "Favorieguy2000" already 

message: Article states: "The show was notorious for its censorship. In some episodes, realistic guns were depicted, but only in flashbacks, such as the showing of guns being fired during a flashback about the Punisher's origins where his wife was killed in the crossfire during a crime. Rules for the production of the show included no punching, throwing through glass, putting children in jeopardy or vampires as well as no usage of the word sinister."
Cited source states: "The reason it's not explicitly confirmed as suicide is due to the strict censorship rules that Spider-Man: The Animated Series was under at the time; death and firearms were played down." It makes no other mention about censorship requirements other than this that I can see.
The two don't correlate. Apart from acknowledging that there was "censorship" (also, "notorious for" seems like a hyped-term/weasel-word that is also not expressed by the source), this article lists a number of very specific things ("no punching, throwing through glass, putting children in jeopardy or vampires as well as no usage of the word sinister") that are not in the source and doesn't even attempt to mention the death/suicide limitation described. So where did that list of so-called censored material come from?
I think this might be a better source, but only with some rewriting of the text to more accurately cover the censorship requirements involved during production. https://screenrant.com/how-censors-changed-spider-man-1994-animated-series-marvel/
~ 82.26.240.218 (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censored material - source does not state anything of the sort