lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miyeok-guk

message: Hello, I'm new to this article and I hope my initial forays into this article and my knowledge on the topic of Korean cuisine will be helpful.  I just wanted to point out that Japanese wakame is different in preparation and there are differences in taste, form, texture in the final product.  Using the term "wakame" for this article on miyeokguk is misleading and ignores this distinction between Korea produced "miyeok" and Japanese produced "wakame".  Even in Asian groceries outside of Korea and Japan distinguishes "miyeok" and "wakame" on their shelves.  If my explanation wasn't sufficient or if you have further questions please, comment below.  I will try to answer them best I can and hopefully reach consensus for my edits.AndrewHKLee (talk) 02:28, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Term issues

message: This article provides a simple and concise overview of the traditional Korean dish miyeokguk. The author provides a brief history of the dish and illustrates the cultural significance of the dish. The article could benefit from mentioning the side dishes (banchan) that are typically eaten alongside miyeokguk, as Korean meals always include a plethora of banchan alongside the main dishes. Likewise, while all the sources used are informative and reliable, it would be beneficial to source older Korean texts and sources that talk about the cultural and historical significance of the food. Finally, there are a couple of sentences that don't flow as well as they could, and the article does have a bit of redundancy. Overall, this is a short and concise yet informative article about the historical and cultural meanings of miyeokguk. Cd631874 (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Template talk:User Galatasaray

message: I think GS's official logo will be the best instead of just GS letters.--Obsteel 10:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The logo, under "Licensing", is categorized as "fair use", which means it cannot be used on user pages, but only in Main space articles on the subject.  --Lambiam 10:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About picture
Talk:Dunin

message: This source says that Ian Chechet (1796  — 1847) is the pioneer of Belarusian literature, contrary to what you have posted on the web page.  You really need sources for this web page. Mindraker 10:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  People 

message: Why is there a link to Wikimedia Commons, cited as a source no less, for the red link to Captain Zbigniew Dunin-Wonsowicz?  Is this supposed to be a painting of Zbigniew Dunin-Wonsowicz?  It smells like ORIGINAL RESEARCH to me, and I don't think we should be citing paintings as if they were sources in situations like this.  Burntsauce 18:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons painting used as a source?
Talk:Jacob J. Hinlopen

message: not finished, more is coming after lunch Taksen 10:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Margaret Irving Handy

message: I want to take Margaret Handy's middle initial out of the title.  I do not know whether her middle initial is an I. or an L.  I'm hoping someone else will know.  It is reported both ways in the two articles on her.  I can't find a way to get it out.  ebdoug.
:I've moved the article to here, Margaret Irving Handy. Moving pages is how they are renamed as it preserves the history of all the editors to have worked on a page. You need to be logged in with a username to move a page, and your account must be 4 days old. If you are able to move a page, you should see a tab at the top the page that says "move". You can get more information here. --Kateshortforbob 17:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle initial
Talk:A Light in the Window (novel)

message: I have a very sick mother, more on that in a moment. I am presently reading this book and have I think only one chapter left. I will be happy to provide some information on this novel, when time allows, after I finish the book. This of course is only if my mother remains somewhat stable. Should she take a turn for the worse, I'll not be able to do it. If anyone has any objections please let me know. Rather than post on my user page, you can email me at my user name here to gmail. Just put Jan Karon in the subject line so I don't mark you as spam. ;) MagnoliaSouth (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better article
Talk:Alexander Kostarev

message: Upon its review on October 19, 2007, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:
::had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources
thus making it ineligible for good article consideration.  According to WP:Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source."
This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria.  The sole reference is the artist's website, which is not a reliable source. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment.  Thank you for your work so far.— Cheers, CP 17:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: Shouldn't CosMoBob be properly called KosMoBob? The Cos portion is not based on cosmos or anything but Kostarev. Cema (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transliteration
Talk:Disen Gage

message: GA has failed - article is rather short, and needs expansion.  It needs more discussion of discography in the history, and information about influences and musical style. The references also need formatting using . Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 01:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA
Talk:Zen (Dutch band)

message: should changed title of page. another band called 'zen'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.128.104  (talk • contribs) 10:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved Zen (band) to Zen (Dutch band), distinguished from Zen (Chinese band) (article created on 30 August 2015‎).--Neo-Jay (talk) 06:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Exodus of 1879

message: I agree that merging the articles is appropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.33.72.143 (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It doesn't seem that there is anything appreciably unique that can be said about Exodusters so I recommend merging it here.
--Mcorazao (talk) 03:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I support a merge. faithless (speak) 10:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Exodusters
Talk:Popular Liberalism

message: For the same reasons than We Blue Reformers, I am suggesting to merge the valuable content of this article into Forza Italia#Factions. Please have your say here. Thank you. --Angelo 11:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't argue too much, although it could overwhelm the FI article - perhaps the best option would be to start a separate Forza Italia factions article? FlagSteward (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:Line of beauty

message: I think the last paragraph of this article is anachronous. Hogarth was writing in a context of Baroque/Rococco art (his professional career spanned the transistion between high Baroque and Rococco), so saying that his conception of the line of beauty stands in opposition to the sinuous compositions of Baroque and Rococco composition (as if that is somehow a separate and degenerate conception) seems like a contradictory and modernist insertion. --♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-curves as distinct from Baroque and Rococo applications thereof

message: Neither the author William de Bolgne nor the book 'Run from the Seven seas' has any article in wikipedia - and google does not give any clue to who this is either. Can anyone confirm that the author and the book exists?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animus00 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  William de Bolgne? 

message: Badly needs some good visual examples to illustrate the principle. -- Dough34 (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs examples
Talk:Woodlands style

message: This page contains no discussion of aesthetic philosophy and presents an entirely eccentric history of the "Woodland School" based only on websites sources with equally dubious credibility. The page needs to be started again from scratch. -76.68.123.58
*Why don't you register an account on Wikipedia and help to improve the page?  --Clausewitz01 (talk) 02:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree the page needs to be started from scratch. The first step however, should be a renaming of the current title to Woodland School of Arts. The current title, Woodlands style, doesn't quite fit the subject matter, it is too generic, and as such misleading. I don't believe there's anything wrong with the given information except that it needs a little spice to it.
Zhaawano (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia does not need "spice". Please keep things neutral. freshacconci talktalk 16:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, articles should be written in a tone that is interesting and engaging without expressing a specific point of view. "Spice" isn't a bad thing as long as it isn't excessive or biased. vıdıoman 03:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong title
Talk:Ningdu County

message: My parents, Gustav and Lina Bürklin (nee Pfeifferling) lived in Ningdu from 1947-50 and were then asked by the Chinese government to leave. As missionaries they pastored the local church. Their three children, Friedel, Werner and Gisela joined them in 1947. I, Werner, vividly remember us swimming in the nearby river. As teenagers we greatly enjoyed living there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wernerburklin (talk • contribs) 19:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission station 

message: If Ningdu County is inhabited primarily by Hakka people, why isn't the word "Hakka" mentioned a single time in the current version of this article? That's not very encyclopedic, is it? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:J. Willard Hershey

message: The dates in the article look very strange to me, but I cribbed them verbatim from the reference I cited.  Anyone who knows what's potting is welcome to give some context. --Slashme 11:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange dates

message: I cut this from the article:
[Please do not use the following if it violates any copywrite laws.]
This is what Brethren Encyclopedia has to say on page 599:
"HERSHEY, JOHN WILLARD (CB), b 1876, scientist, educator.   The son of Abraham and Hosie Eyster Hershey, J. Willard Hershey was born near Gettysburg, PA.   He joined the Marsh Creek congregation in 1902 or 1903.  He taught school while studying at the Millersville, PA, state Normal school, from which he graduated in 1901.   He also studied at Pennsylvania (Gettysburg) College (BS 1907; hon. MS 1910), Harvard U., Johns Hopkins U, and the U of Chicago (PhD, 1924).  Hershey taught at Bridgewater College [a Church of the Brethren college] (1909-11), Defiance College (1912-15, 1916-18), and McPherson College [another Church of the Brethren college] (1918-ff.).  He married Effie Bowman in 1916.   Known as an excellent professor at McPherson College, he published several textbooks and pursued research with students.   After seven years of experiments, he won acclaim in 1929 as the first American to produce synthetic diamonds. DFD"   
Citations given: J H Winder, "Genius" (1931)69-89; Blue Book (1923) index, esp 241; McPherson College Bulletin (Nov 1929).
What is the Brethren Encyclopedia's copyright status? --Slashme (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:Nebula Maker

message: I wrote this article, and, revisiting it and the other articles I've written for wikipedia, I don't think I'll be writing any more, simply because the whole enterprise - attempting to write a verifiable, truthful, WELL WRITTEN article, has become lost under baroque and contradictory wiki-guidelines and the parochial attitudes of spods with various axes to grind, and various other wiki-wank. It's just too much effort, what with holding down a job and all. 
Afore I vanish forever, a few points: Wikipedia is a great idea, a wonderful resource, and an interesting forum. It's also hard to find your way around, hard to get even some of the most basic writing and editing done on, and interfaces with the user in a cold, unfriendly and pedantic fashion. The "Help" section is appalling. 
Please feel free to disagree with this. I may even read it someday.
Incidentally, none of this is a dig at the user above who seems to be asking a fair and genuine question. If it's any help, I own the book and took that photo with my phone...
and here are my four tildes - Ultrahorse (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: long run for a short slide
Talk:Concrete art

message: I like to see references to German sculptors, in particular to Norbert Kricke and Erich Hauser in the English Wikipedia (because I love their art) - but, please, can anybody help, why are they listed under Concrete Art?
The article on Kricke itself assigns his art to L'Art Informel. His sculptures are expressive in style, as they are supposed to gesturally visualize (imagined) movement. The shape / form of Hauser's sculptures, on the other hand, is intuitive as well. There is no rigid formal concept which they are based on, rather they gesturally express force and strength. I doubt that a reference can be found to back their classification as Concrete Art. I propose to remove both artists from this list.
On the other hand, I do miss sadly the following artists: Ingo Glass (RO), Ewerdt Hilgemann (DE - NL), Marcello Morandini (IT), Ben Muthofer (DE), David Rabinowitch (CA - DE), Ulrich Rückriem (DE), HD Schrader (DE).
All the best - Welt-der-Form (talk) 11:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification / borderline
Talk:Decadent movement

message: It would be nice if the "concept" section explained the concept in more detail.  Currently, it is all about who called whom "decadent", with only (half of) the first sentence actually explaining what the concept was all about. LachlanA (talk) 07:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept of Decadence 

message: I'm doing a seminar on Decadence, and I've taken some key words from Decadent Style (John R. Reed), Baudelaire (Jean-Paul Sartre), The Decadent Poetry of the Eighteen-Nineties (John M. Munro) (not really in a particular order):
#Melancholia (masochistic, depressed, schizoid)
#Revolution (independent of society, politics, morals and virtue)
#Sexual inversion (eroticism, sensuality, homosexuality)
#Beauty in the ugly
#Artificiality (Aestheticism, art for art's sake)
#Art is permanent and useless
#Poète maudit
#Drug abusers/alcoholics
#Fantasy/introspection/escapism/idealism (which ends in hopelessness)
#Weltschmerz (for Baudelaire, mostly)
#Transcendence
#Self-conscious (detail)
#Self-conflict, contrast, paradox
#Suffering
#Emptiness, void, abyss, nothingness
MichaelExe (talk) 01:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things Assosciated with Decadence 

message: The Russian article has some information about a modern revival of this movement in Moscow & St. Petersburg. Esn (talk) 10:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern revival in Russia

message: All this article says is that, yes, there was this art movement called The Decadent Movement and here are some of the artists associated with it. And that's about it.
What are some overarching themes in the Decadent Movement? What questions or issues did they struggle with? Were there any important exhibitions? Was this primarily a literary movement or one of fine art? Or music? Or film? Were there any geographical centers of activity? How did they distinguish themselves from the Romantic Movement? 
So much more needs to be said here. Any art history majors with some time on their hands? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 20:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please, some elaboration
Talk:Decadentism

message: Italo Svevo a representative of decadentismo ?
Now, that's something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.173.62.130 (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I'm working on this stub article for an assignment. I look forward to engage with you in the future --Ericla123 (talk) 05:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Florentine painting

message: The Florentine School favored male beauty.  What was the name of the art school that saw beauty in females?  Venetian was it?  I can't recall.   --71.107.217.63 (talk) 07:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Venetian School pretty well, particularly through Titian. Sorry about the 5 year wait for a reply... Mozzy66 (talk) 00:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Male Beauty

message: Arguably the most influential school of western art history, and for many synonymous with Renaissance art. I don't know what importance rating this attracts but presume it needs to be pretty high. Can someone competent assess it please?
Also, it is really incomplete it deals with the 14C really well, but then stops before the main game in the 15C. Anyone feel like expanding?Mozzy66 (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance and incompleteness
Talk:Found object (music)

message: Looking at the edit history of Found art and Found object, the former was created in 2002 while the latter was created in 2004. Objet trouvé redirects to the older article. Found object seems to be far shorter, more basic and poorly sourced. The main article as far as I can see, is Found art. Neither of them clearly establish the parameters of the article, but I believe Found art contains the best art-specific content. The text in Found art repeatedly talks about 'found objects'.
As a WP:BOLD suggestion, I propose we move our discussion to Talk:Found art and seek to improve that article, preferably renaming it too. As a consequence, Found object could be nominated for deletion, as a duplicate of the earlier article. Sionk (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sionk—you say "preferably renaming it". I just have to say that in my opinion that is the number one priority. The reason is that the terminology "found art" is virtually unsupported by sources. Bus stop (talk) 02:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad you agree on that. It is a proposal that needs to be agree at Talk:Found art, I think. I've started a thread there. I realise this may split the discussion between two Talk pages *but* if we are agreed Found art is the main article (wrongly named), the work needs to be done there first. Sionk (talk) 10:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Main article

message: I'm changing the name of this page to 'Found object (music)'. This topic has been discussed by several editors, who agree the current status quo is not good. The content here about Found objects in art is a duplicate of the main article Found art (which needs cleaning up).
I have my doubts that 'found object' is an established term in music, but the section has a couple of sources, so other people can decide whether it's a valid topic. Sionk (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I also have my doubts that "found objects" is an established term in music. Bus stop (talk) 07:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm not an expert. Many of the current links to this article are from subjects related to the musician Fred Frith, who is quoted as saying "It's more to do with my interest in found objects and the use of certain kinds of textures which have an effect on the string." I don't know if he uses the term literally, as 'objects that have been found', or as a musical term. But certainly he seems to use the phrase. Sionk (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: --Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this article be titled "found sound"?
Talk:Funk art

message: there's a few issues with the content you've added. First off, what is the source for the content about disrupting the symposium? You've made a ref with the name "Conner", but that has no definition. Are you trying to reference one of your own books that you added to the reference section? I would suggest you take a look at WP:CITE so that you can add an in-line citation to the source of your info, and then remove the things you manually added into References. Also, did you mean to reference Selz' book, Funk, as the source for the statement "In fact, several of the artists involved registered a protest with Selz"? That's what the ref name "Selz" refers to when you use it that way. Let me know if you have questions. -- Fyrael (talk) 22:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New refs and such
Talk:Gothic Romanticism

message: What is the difference between Gothic Romanticism and Gothic fiction? Can theese articles be merged? Åsa L (talk) 13:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree. I'm adding a Merge template... Volpeculus sagacis (talk) 22:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could we just redirect instead?  There's very little info here.  H.G. 22:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between [[Gothic Romanticism]] and [[Gothic fiction]]?
Talk:Mukul Deora

message: I contest the notability, in addition to the fact that it has no references of any kind. How are we supposed to believe what is written.re Carter | Talk to me 11:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Hypermodernism (art)

message: Additions I made
Hello,
I added the musician Otto Von Schirach and the aritst group FriendsWithYou because they meet the description given by your definition of hypermodernism. I believe closer inspection of these two artists for yourself will verify this.
-anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.40.197 (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

message: This reads like gibberish and has no references. Is it for real? 78.150.177.38 (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly, there are any number of legitimate art movements descriptions of which are characterized by what reads like gibberish. There is a single source listed in the Bibliography, but no inline citations. I have been too complacent about this article for some time now, and have begun checking the references. So far, very little of it stands up to scrutiny. Thank you for calling attention to this.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A wind-up? 

message: It seems like this is a really low quality garbled mess of an article mainly built by a single user with a history of questionable, citationless contributions to Wikipedia. Any relevant points within are already covered in a far superior way under Hypermodernity, so there doesn't really seem to be a good reason to keep this page around. GoodBoy69 (talk) 07:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete or condense and fold into Hypermodernity?
Talk:Luminism (American art style)

message: I'm not a big fan of Thomas Kinkade's radioactive, burning cottages, but I think that he ought to be given a shout-out among the contemporary practitioners of luminism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SienkRJ (talk • contribs) 16:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Thomas? 