Talk:Grožnjan

message: :Image:Grožnjan (grb).gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Grožnjan (grb).gif

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grožnjan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718235717/http://www.groznjan-grisignana.hr/opcinskauprava/Statut_opcine_groznjan.pdf to http://www.groznjan-grisignana.hr/opcinskauprava/Statut_opcine_groznjan.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I reverted a bold move recently, as the discussion in #Grisignana above from 10 years ago was not conclusive. The part that I found particularly jarring here were the signposts in Istria, visible in Google Street View e.g. here or here at the intersection of the D21 road and the local road that leads to this place (2 km away) and indeed here at the entrance to the town itself - the signs are clearly not very new and there is no obvious preference for the Italian name. So there doesn't seem to be a major reason to avoid consistency with the naming of the article on all other bilingual towns in the Istrian county. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  title