Talk:Financial Action Task Force blacklist

message: The NCCT is a common reference for *National Center for Computational Toxicology*, perhaps the redirect from NCCT should lead to an ambiguous page. 136.165.185.45 18:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  NCCT is rarely used in professional circles as the acronym set out in this article anyhow.  I will set up a dismbiguation page. --Legis (talk - contribs) 20:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from NCCT 

message: The latter part of this article mixes up the NCCT with the OECD's survey on "implementing the internationally agreed tax standard". In particular, the "Eight Report" was published in 2007 not 2009, there are currently no countries on the blacklist, and most definately not Monaco, Andorra and Liechtenstein! └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 02:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree there is no such thing as a tax shelter and there is no real offshoring industry designed for people to evade tax assessments and payments - a completely absurd notion... Where do people get these ideas from? And why would anyone think that Monaco, Andorra and Liechtenstein would try to help tax evaders when that is their primary means of income?  Stevenmitchell (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that such sarcasm is misplaced - I think that VodkaJazz has rised legitimate concerns with the article and his statement doesn't look as denial of existence of tax heavens, etc. Alinor (talk) 19:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree with VodkaJazz - currently the last part of the page is a mess. It states that a "eight report of 2009" lists some countries and then a section "current state" (appearently "after the eight report") lists another countries from 2007 (plus notes about developments in 2008). So, maybe the main part of the VodkaJazz explanation is correct - the eight report is in 2007 (1 report per year), in the next reports (if there are such in 2008 and 2009) there are no countries and finally the Andorra, Liechtenstein and Monaco are not on the OECD FATF NCCT list (1st, 2nd, etc. reports lists), but on the "OECD list of countries not implementing the internationally agreed tax standard"? It would be nice if we can add this new category with a proper source, also if we found sources for the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th FATF reports. Alinor (talk) 19:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrid mix up 

message: What ARE these counter measures? Alinor (talk) 11:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counter measures 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on FATF blacklist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060715090401/http://www.fatf-gafi.org:80/dataoecd/0/0/37029619.pdf to http://www.fatf-gafi.org/dataoecd/0/0/37029619.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on FATF blacklist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5kiOHMwjH?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oecd.org%2Fdataoecd%2F50%2F0%2F43606256.pdf to http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/50/0/43606256.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There have been multiple reports from various media outlets (and not only Indian media) about blacklisting of Pakistan by Asia-Pacific division of FATF.
# Enhanced monitoring list is called blacklist.
# Pakistani finance ministry has rejected the reports.
# Media outlets are only claiming to have obtained news from "officials". The "formality" pending they are talking of will be revealed in October and we will come to know how much substance these reports held.
# Pakistan doesn't comply with 32 out of 40 parameters of money laundering as of now but it only needs three votes to avoid list. Neither voting has happened as well as formal declaration will be in October.
# As there is no formal declaration by APG neither about blacklisting Pakistan nor about "praising" it, kindly avoid disruptive editing.
Regards Aman.kumar.goel (talk) 02:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: APG doesn't have the authority to add a country to the blacklist of the FATF, Pakistan should be removed https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/pakistan-rejects-media-reports-of-fatf-blacklisting-1.65967699 103.70.152.26 (talk) 04:41, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  FATF blacklist is really a big deal. You can't add it willy nilly based on junky newspaper reports. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan 

message: Here we have Pakistan removed and India added. India has been removed, but where on the page should Pakistan be re-added? Anyone familiar with this page's organization, please help.--Quisqualis (talk) 07:48, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism