Talk:Eclipse (Meyer novel)

message: I put the infobox in and got rid of the extra picture, and comments? I don't know if I did something wrong for the infobox...I've never done an infobox for a book that hasn't been relesed yet. -Bella 20:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Someone filled this section with "Whiny Bullshit" written over and over.  I haven't even read the book but wanted to look it up and found that.  Whether you like the book or not I found that to be completely inappropriate.  I reverted it to what it was before --Samuronin (talk) 06:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Who editied it so it's like what it is now? It looks great! I'd like to thank them..... Bella Swan 20:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, but I disagree. The plot summary was around 1500 words before, which is much too long. Plot summaries are meant to give readers a general overview of the story, not to provide a detailed account of everything that happens. Please see Wikipedia:Plot summaries for the guidelines that I'm trying to follow, especially the section on length. Thanks. Andrea (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

text: That is true, but it also says that the plot summary should be, in comparison, just as long as the rest of the sections in the article. There should be a 'reception' section of the article, not just a huge plot summary. ~ Bella Swan? 01:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm not against it being a bit longer. I can work on adding to it myself, some time soon. Andrea (talk) 
23:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

text: What other specific things do you think we need in the summary? I think Andrea did an awesome job with keeping the summary short, and keeping the details. I'm just afraid that if we add a little more detail, it will require further explaining to explain the detail, and then the plot summary is bloated again. ~ Bella Swan? 13:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Mm, if you think so, then fix the plot summary up. For my opinion, I think the sum right now is fine. It's supposed to outline the events of the story, not supposed to have emotional strain which can be interpreted this way or that. That said, I'll take another look at the summary. IceUnshattered[ t | c ] 23:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary

message: :Image:Eclipsecover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Eclipsecover.jpg

message: This is a note saying that a Twilight Task Force might be in the works. A poll is currently being held here to see who would be willing to join. If you would like to join, please participate in this poll. Thanks, ~ Bella Swan? 13:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Twilight'' Task Force

message: I was just reading over this page, and it cited Revish as a source of positive reception? Not that I have anything against the book, but from what I could discern isn't Revish a site where people write their own reviews?
I mean, as in, not proper reviews, just anyone. I couldn't really call this a reliable review when compared to say, the New York Times or something similar, or even an English professor.
--Opacic (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know much about Revish, but regardless, the link was broken so I took it out and replaced it with other positive reception. Andrea (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Reception? 

message: Since we are quickly aproaching the date when Eclipse starts filming, My profile has the rough draft for Eclipse. If you can help edit that, we can use that as the film page when it does start filming. User:ChaosMaster16/EclipseChaosMaster16 (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse 

message: I have began creation of the article for the film adaption here, feel free to add content as the section progresses, and soon can be moved to it's mainspace title. • S • C • A • R • C • E • 10:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, forgot to check the talk page for any pre-page creations, oh well. Either one wiil do! • S • C • A • R • C • E • 10:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse (2010 film) 

message: From what I've been the article "Twilight Sucks and not in a good way" is a blog post in a non notable magazine. The author of the article is just sharing his opinions about the book. It isn't noteworthy like a newspaper or a porfessional critical review.Mo HH92  Talk 11:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kellan Rices' blog post 

message: A user keeps removing the Premise section of the Film Adaptation. However, the film can vary greatly from the source material (in this case the novel). The official synopsis of the film was released and it has not just been made up by me. Should we keep this section, and remove it when we make the film's Wikipedia page, or should we remove it and create the film's page now since filming begins in less than a week? ChaosMaster16 (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we can't create an article until there is too much content for one section (probably a couple of more weeks), I'm fine with the premise I guess as long as it's not a direct, complete quote. • S • C • A • R • C • E • 01:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premise 

message: Eclipse (film) can easily be moved to Eclipse (1994 film) as it is not the target page once we've created the article for the film. • S • C • A • R • C • E • 16:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: May even meet CSD for notability • S • C • A • R • C • E • 16:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipse (film) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Eclipse (Meyer novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081217092806/http://www.tulsaworld.com:80/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=070810_4_D3_spanc43808 to http://www.tulsaworld.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=070810_4_D3_spanc43808
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080905223652/http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6469272.html to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6469272.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Eclipse (Meyer novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100406011314/http://www.reelzchannel.com/article/901/eclipse-quiz to http://www.reelzchannel.com/article/901/eclipse-quiz
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081217083257/http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6474707.html?q=eclipse+meyer to http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6474707.html?q=eclipse+meyer
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified