lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Beverhoutsveld

message: A fine start, but needs (a) an infobox, (b) greater explanation of the background (was this part of a named war?), and (c) more explicit indications of where this takes place - I can take a look at it and recognize terms like Ghent and Flanders, but the term "Netherlands" or "Holland" (which I realize is not synonymous) does not appear anywhere, and the average reader could easily have trouble understanding where this is taking place. LordAmeth 20:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the critique; as it is one of my first translations of an article on the Dutch wikipedia I value this enormously, and will act on it.MarcoLittel 13:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment
Talk:Luc Bertrand

message: Article created to provide additional basic information on Belgium. Pvosta 13:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:County (Gaelic games)

message: I can see how the old map, which indicated which counties were "dominant" in one code over another and which were dual, could be construed as WP:OR and I supported its deletion. However the new version simply indicates which counties contest which championships. These are all verifiable facts and I don't think this map constitutes OR. (Not sure what the protocol is for repeating the same comment on multiple articles.) --Eamonnca1 (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey sorry about that, I went to undo my edit but some how made a mess of it Gnevin (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Counties contesting championship

message: Hi all wondered why some counties have the official County GAA crest and others have Crests the would associated with government administrative divisions. Is this a copy right issue or a simple wiki mistake. If so can it be changed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:4242:F900:9175:2DAB:8AEF:F150 (talk) 21:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: County Crests
Talk:Austrian Pinscher

message: The photo provided is not very "typical" as the dogs are usually of a heavier build, see pictures on the Austrian breed club page http://www.oe-pinscher-klub.at. --Hafwyn (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:Daniel Cardon de Lichtbuer

message: Article created to provide additional basic information on Belgium. Pvosta 14:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:John Campbell, of Strachur

message: There is a fuller article in Wikipedia on this same general called John Campbell (of Strachur). 85.0.220.59 20:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Different person.Lachrie (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Campbell (general) 

message: I don't (necessarily) want to move John Campbell of Strachur but for some reason the discussion page for John Campbell (British Army officer) (i.e. the article about John Campbell of Stonefield) redirects to the discussion page for John Campbell of Strachur! Obviously this is a major error and needs to be fixed. 78.146.61.64 (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: According to other sources (e.g. http://www.thepeerage.com/p12711.htm#i127104 and http://histfam.familysearch.org/getperson.php?personID=I242201&tree=Nixon), his father was Colin Campbell of Strachur, not "Admiral John Campbell."76.188.98.89 (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's name
Talk:Galvanostat

message: ----
Hello, I have edited this voice a bit, since I thought it deserved this. About the question to merge or not this voice to the current source voice, the only thing I can say is that the galvanostat is an instrument used in electrochemistry, while the current source is a widely diffused concept in electricity, with lots of different realizations (one being the galvanostat itself). If the two woices would merge, it would be necessary to merge even the voltage source and the potentiostat voices accordingly, since their relation is the same. Daniele.tampieri 14:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Henry Dick

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:UNIVAC 1108

message: The 1106 was a slowed down version of the 1108.  The 1100/10 and 1100/20 were similar to the 1106, but with electronic versus core memory.  The CAU nomenclature for CPU was not applied until the 1110 was introduced in about 1972.  The I/O section of the 1108 CPU was isolated in a separate component called the Input/Output Access Unit (IOAU), logically necessitating a change in the name for a CPU to Command/Arithmetic Unit (CAU).  The 1100/40 was an 1110 with two kinds of memory:  slow and fast.  Sperry called this "layered" memory.  It was necessary to mark programs as requiring slow or fast memory according to whether they were I/O-bound or compute-bound, respectively.  The 1100/80 dropped the CAU/IOAU nomenclature, yet the architecture remained the same.  There were up to 4 CPUs and 4 IOUs where the channels lived.  The 1100/80 was the first Univac to directly support IBM-style block multiplexor channels.  Formerly, devices that were built for the IBM market could be connected to a Univac only by way of a Multiple Subsystem Adaptor (MSA) which was a block multiplexor that adapted the word channels of the Univac to the byte-oriented data stream.  There was an 1100/80 and an 1100/80A.  Externally, the only difference was an improved hardware partitioning and system operator panel.  Incandescent lights were replaced with a Christmas-tree array of green, red, and yellow LEDs.--72.75.76.186 14:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:William Nicholson, 1st Baron Nicholson

message: The article says "he was given the substantive rank of major on 1 March 1881" and then later it says "He was promoted to the substantive rank of major on 21 March 1885". Could someone clarify this? --Bduke  (Discussion) 10:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Now corrected. He was promoted to brevet major on 1 March 1881. Dormskirk (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Bduke  (Discussion) 21:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantive rank of major
Talk:Hew Dalrymple Ross

message: A few (very minor) quibbles and queries:
*The lead should probably specify that he was the last person ever to hold the title of Lieutenant-General of the Ordnance. I suspect that to casual readers who land on this via random page, that will be one of the most interesting things about him.
**Now included.
*"Ross was educated at the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich and commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Royal Artillery on 6 March 1796. Promoted to lieutenant on 10 May 1795..." is confusing - it seems to suggest that he was a full lieutenant before becoming a second lieutenant (a more junior rank). Is there a date wrong somewhere?
**My mistake with the commissioning date - now corrected. 
*I may be wrong, but I think the Royal Artillery during the Napoleonic period didn't use the rank of "lieutenant" without qualification (that is, an RA officer was never just "lieutenant", they were always explicitly first lt, second lt etc).
**You are correct - now corrected.
*Is "After the Battle of Vitoria in June 1813, Ross' guns were continually with the most advanced troops, and they captured the only piece of artillery held by the French Army" right? It seems to imply that the French troops only had a single artillery piece, which begs the question of how they managed to make any kind of fight against the heavily-armed British. Is it actually the case that Ross was the only person to capture a French gun, rather than that he captured the only French gun? 
**He captured the sole remaining piece of artillery held by the French - now specified.
*"Artillery Commander, Northern District with delegated command over all the forces of the four northern counties" should probably specify what the "northern counties" are. It's not clear whether he was commander of the north of Ireland, northern England, northern Britain (eg Scotland), or of the northern counties of an occupied territory in Europe. I assume the North of England, but bear in mind that a lot of people reading articles on the Napoleonic Wars are likely to be French and not know the peculiarly English meaning of "the north" as "between Birmingham and Newcastle", and assume that this means he was exiled to some windswept outpost in the Shetlands.
**It was the four most northern counties in England - now specified.
*Did he actually serve in the Crimea, or was he responsible for checking the guns before they were shipped out?
**He was responsible for checking the guns before they were shipped out - now made clearer.
I know these are all nitpicky and on the whole this is of a very good quality. Mogism (talk) 20:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few queries
Talk:George Milne, 1st Baron Milne

message: A better picture with Zivojin Misic:
http://whereismacedonia.org/images/about_macedonia/history/ww1/general-zivojin-misic-general-Milne.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.205.40.17 (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

message: Footnote 27, 28: "Jeffery 2006". What it is?
"They are certainly not worth the life of a single British soldier”. Where is the quote from? (page).77.50.30.241 (talk) 12:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Jeffery, Keith (2006). Field Marshal Sir Henry Wilson: A Political Soldier. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820358-2. Dormskirk (talk) 23:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...not worth the life of a single British soldier 
Talk:Barry Domvile

message: There is no question that Domvile was a rather virulent anti-Semite, and I would like to make clear I find his anti-Semitic remarks disgusting: some of his anti-Semitic claims before the Advisory Committee when he was interned are revolting.  On the other hand, calling him a pro-Nazi fascist is perhaps a step too far, especially considering the reprehensible unreferenced nature of this article, which is by and large based on an edit by User:Fyes (no longer with Wikipedia, it would seem) from all the way back in 2004.  At any rate, I've changed the lead, such as it is, to that he was a "British Pro-German anti-Semite in the years before the Second World War" which no one can dispute.  The assertion that his diaries were deposited with the "Royal Naval College" was both unclear and inaccurate, since apparently the National Maritime Museum, of which Domvile was a proponent, were given the diaries in 1972. --Simon Harley (Talk | Library). 21:47, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Excisions
Talk:George Anson, 1st Baron Anson

message: See: https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=SsIUAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA7#v=onepage&q&f=false & its explication https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=e47WAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA1075#v=onepage&q&f=false —porges 01:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently a notorious gambler
Talk:Bethlehem, Carmarthenshire

message: It seems a great shame (and a deliberate undermining of the Welsh Language) that editors will come in and replace the busy Llundain to Hwlffordd road with the busy London to Haverfordwest road. It may be debatable whether the local word for an English city belongs in the article, but surely the correct word should be used for a Welsh town. TomRawlinson 14:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the English Wikipedia.  Paul Silverman 15:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:William Winter (chess player)

message: I have in my hand a copy of "Chess for Match Players", published by Lawrence and Wishart, which reads "First Published 1936"...so I've changed the date from 1951 to 1936.Chris. Fulker 15:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book
Talk:Ingrid Janbell

message: In attempting to de-orphan this page, I discovered that this actress's claim to fame is the recurring role of Virena in the Swedish Crime Drama film series Hassel, which has produced 12 films over the last 25 years.  But there is no page for Hassel as of yet.  I could write it, but I'd basically be babelfishing the Swedish wikipedia page for it.  Perhaps someone who has actually seen the series, or knows something about its importance to Swedish culture could try.  Is he the Swedish James Bond?  Columbo?  Clouseau?  Sam Spade?  Something completely different?  Listmeister (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hassel page needed
Talk:Jamestown, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Rafael Garza Gutiérrez

message: The italics are on this portion of the article.
Club América
"........ Liga Mayor de la Ciudad" (Major League of Mexico City). Garza led América to four consecutive championships (player in 1924–25; and player/coach in 1925–26, 1926–27, 1927–28). America would have its next league championship in 1965–66.[citation needed]"66.74.176.59 (talk) 15:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: . There were two ' characters before "Liga", which starts italic text, but a single " at the end, so that the italics continued. JohnCD (talk) 17:16, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  type face has changed 
Talk:Detroit, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Wait Till Your Father Gets Home

message: It now airs overnight on the Boomerang Channel in the U.S. Johnppd24 08:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted a legitimate question on Two And A Half Men talk page. Later, I have decided to come here to be in peace while reading information about one of my favourite programmes "Wait Till Your Father Gets Home". My peace was disrupted when my edit was reverted under the false claim that Wikipedia is "not a forum." WP:NOTFORUM. After resuming the discussion (which is meant for the benefit of that Wiki article). I decided to continue on to the Wait Till Your Father Gets Home article. I wondered about Sarah Whittaker was included in the Character guide. She is mentioned but there is technically no character guide! When entering the talk page, I wander on what seriously appears to be a discussion about the TOPIC, instead of the ARTICLE. Yet nobody reverted these edits. In Correct (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although it has a few citations etc I regard this as somewhat a stub. Should it be marked as such?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonTrew (talk • contribs) 16:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Not sure where to put this, but the show was bought by the BBC and shown in Britain in the 1980s. YouTube clip to prove it! 81.158.1.233 (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK 

message: I was wondering about why there is no character guide. Should I add one? I would like to rewrite the summary and any character details should be included in the Character Guide. I will do this later. Or perhaps I should just go ahead and do it without asking before somebody reverts my edits on talk pages. In Correct (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Guide 

message: The "Voices of" section correctly includes David Hayward the actor, but the link connects to the "All My Children" character.  There is no Wikipedia article for the actor.  How does one edit that section? AndyGeiger (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor David Hayward
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Coppi's

message: Unless "consensus" is construed to mean "unanimity", I don't see how there wasn't a consensus for deletion. There were few Keep votes, and the only reason given (besides the one about being a "cycling history museum", which is a gross exaggeration: they have some old cycling pictures on the wall) is that there are a lot of Google hits. Washington probably has a couple of hundred restaurants that will generate a lot of Google hits. That doesn't suffice to elevate a restaurant from being just another business into the kind of noteworthiness that calls for treatment in an encyclopedia. Even good reviews don't do that.
Note that the article itself doesn't even say anything about it that distinguishes it tremendously. Its menu leans toward the organic: big deal. It has a theme: big deal.
--Largo Plazo 15:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strong disagreement with failure to delete
Talk:Lindholm Høje

message: The Nordic Iron Age is bC and not AD ! 46.11.74.102 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nordic Iron Age
Talk:Aalborg University

message: University of Aalborg or Aalborg University? Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On the University's own webpage in English it states Aalborg University (AAU).--Henry Berthelsen (talk) 14:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I went ahead and moved the article.—Noetic Sage 05:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  need to get the name consistent 

message: as usual for this situation  DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Aalborg University – Esbjerg]] into [[Aalborg University]]
Talk:New Scot

message: This appears to be a candidate to be transwikied to Wiktionary. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 15:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Transwiki?

message: This term is simply not used by ordinary people in any capacity, it is a government catch word to make immigration more appealing to immigrants and more acceptable to the Scottish people. As you can see the only refs for this are from Government websites.
I agree with above, I asked a politician at a SNP meeting his opinion on 100 white Scots migrating to central Africa and naming themselves (New Africans), he awkwardly replied that he felt that would be disrespectful to the African people and probably is racism having a unique ethnic background, culture and heritage separate to our own.
The term New Scots is an acceptable form of racism against the Scottish People. The Scots people have a unique heritage, identifiable DNA, Celtic culture and language, it is stated in Scotland that the Scots are a race. Now, I would not move to China and declare myself a New Asian or New Chinese man as I am White European, that to me is disrespectful. 
It is obvious that some forms of Racism are acceptable and some are not, this proves Systemic Racism within Scotland's institution as Racism works both ways. The system in Scotland permits Racism where Government Language deems it acceptable. There is no such thing as New Scots, but new migrant nationals living in Scotland, its not acceptable that Scotland labels then (New Scots) if they are fully proud of lets say their Polish identity. 2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:1D41:1B47:5B20:F093 (talk) 21:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Government language

message: The term "New Scots" is not widely accepted in Scotland and has been a basis for argument on many occasions as the Scots people are a designated ethnic group, retaining a cultural, heritage and so on.
This title has been questioned and debated within the SNP recently as it's insensitive and offensive.
The basis comes from the liberal left believes that the Scottish are not a race, and are European. That is an opinion, however, the Scots classify as a race, so any terminology that states the opposite is racism.
The example brought forward was China, a person would not be able to migrate into China and despair themselves the New Chinese or New Asian without offending the indigenous ethnic group.
With everything that is New, we have old and I think a section should be added here stating how potentially offensive and insulting it may be.2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:A519:1706:C44B:DCD2 (talk) 12:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Scots - Offensive & Racist title.
Talk:Cabildo insular

message: Thank You.
[[ hopiakuta  | [[ %c2%a1 %c2%bf  %7e%7e%7e%7e  -]] 15:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  If [[La Nouvelle-Orléans]]' [[The_Cabildo]] was in 1795, then there's conflict of "cabildos were created under the Law of Cabildos of 1927."