lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kensington Gore

message: I vote for split, but only if it could be merged within an appropriate article, as it does have notability, but insufficient material to stand on its own versus blackface.
::Such as Stage makeup, Theatrical makeup, or Movie makeup
For you consideration
* Stage blood, previously failed
::TheSwami has previously indicated his interest
* Gore, already exists, not so much as an article, but as a pseudo-disambiguation
::And it currently contains two references to Kensington Gore
::Which I pointed the non-linked entry to this page, for consistancy
— WurmWoodeT 04:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also a band called Kensington Gore too. I came here looking for info on them.
 ♫ Яєdxx ♪♫♪♫♪Talk 01:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: 1. Kensington Gore is not a street in Westminster, it belongs to the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.
2. The road is more than just the section running south of Hyde Park, but also includes two stretches of residential street on either side of the Royal Albert Hall, thus making up the triangle or "gore".
I'd correct it myself but don't have time right now. (jjtar (talk) 13:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs correction 
Talk:SIG Sauer AG

message: I don't think it's accurate to credit products developed and manufactured by the SIG conglomerate to Swiss Arms AG. Although Swiss Arms is the descendant of SIG's firearms branch, the former has only a fraction of the output and R+D of SIG, and had nothing to do with the SG 510, P220 and any machine gun variants. Koalorka (talk) 13:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Swiss Arms does not make any P220s. Swiss Arms has nothing to do with the SG 540, the rifles sold in Canada are not 540s either.. Don't know where you are getting your information. Koalorka (talk) 22:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Legacy products

message: They are products of Swiss Arms:
* Swiss Arms
** SIG 510/STGW 57
** SIG M400: 5.56×45mm NATO with direct gas system
** SIG SG 540
** SIG SG 542
** SIG 550 (Fass 90 / Stgw 90)
** SIG 551
** SIG 552
** SIG 553 SOW
** SIG 516:  5.56×45mm NATO with AR-15 design (gas piston), 16" barrel
** SIG 716: 516-based rifle chambered for .308 Winchester/7.62×51mm NATO
** SIG 522LR
** SIG 556
** SIG MCX
** SIG 751 SAPR  (PE 90 based 308/7,62)
** SIG SHR 970 (Swiss Hunting Rifle; multiple calibers; barrel change capability
Digitallymade (talk) 06:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  These products are NOT made by Sig Sauer and are being removed from the Sig Sauer page 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. No rationale given. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 15:31, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Swiss Arms →  – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 103.62.155.134 (talk) 14:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 August 2023 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Swiss Arms →  – The branding of Swiss made products are now under SIG Sauer AG. Also it's the legal name of the Company and the website matches the current name. 103.62.155.134 (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Agreed, I stumbled across this article from the Sig Sauer P226 page and was surprised to see it still listed under the old name. Thanks for bringing this up. IrrationalBeing (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 August 2023
Talk:Marylebone High Street

message: There was a section of "selected stores" - this was just a spam magnet, mostly unsourced, and fell foul of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. We don't exist to list shops on a street. If any of the stores that are currently or were previously on the street have been noted for their location in reliable sources, they can be written about as part of the normal prose. Fences&Windows 00:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stores
Talk:Makapansgat pebble

message: this article should have pictures because its hard to visualize how these pebbles are different form others without one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.190.88 (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not been able to find a picture that gives explicit permission for its use, however the external links lead to pictures GrassHopHer (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs pics 

message: The edit history of 3,000,000 BC in art has been merged in to this page to correct a cut and paste move which occurred during Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3,000,000 BC in art.  The text from the article 3,000,000 BC in art was contributed by User:Keithh on 17:07, 4 June 2008. Hiding T  09:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It is not at all difficult to classify this as art - the pebble is a Found object. The Australopithecus transformed it into art by changing its context. Paul Murray (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art 
Talk:Martin Olav Sabo Bridge

message: This is a very poor picture -- it doesn't give you much idea of the bridge at all, especially the rather unique cable-stayed structure.  We need a better picture here! T-bonham (talk) 03:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:HMNZS Otago (P148)

message: HMNZS Otago (P148)#Upgrade currently says the vessel had her armament upgraded from a Bushmaster 25mm to a Rafael Typhoon 25mm.  But the Rafael Typhoon article, and various references I found suggest the Typhoon is everything but the actual weapon - that is the sensors, ballistics computer, and the mechanical aiming components of the gun.  Typhoon mounts can accommodate a variety of guns, including the Bushmaster.
I suggest that the upgrade did not replace the Bushmaster, just the sensors and ballistic computer supplied with it, with something superior.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  autocannon
Talk:Marxist aesthetics

message: poetry magic is one of the sources/references for Marxist aesthetics?
The following is from poetrymagic and shows how biased and unfavorable of an explanation this random website has:
There are more fundamental problems. Literature is broad and richly diversified: Marxism is not. How can the second encompass the first? Of course if Marxism were a scientific theory, a small number of laws would serve to explain a wide range of effects. But Marxism is not a scientific theory. Deductions from its generalizations have been spectacularly inaccurate. The rise in living standards of capitalist working class; revolution in Russia of all places; the Russian-Chinese conflict; the repression under Lenin, Stalin and all Soviet leaders to Gorbachev himself, the uprisings in Berlin, Budapest, and Prague. Marxist theory "explained" all these events, but only by cooking up suspect subsidiary hypotheses. If Marxism fails intellectually, do not its aesthetics fall to the ground? Similarly, where supported by them, is not Marxist aesthetics open to the objections levelled at Structuralism and Lacanian theory?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.5.140 (talk) 00:30, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: bad source

message: Art and Society Essays in Marxist Aesthetics by Adolfo Sanchez Vazquez  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 05:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant Reference
Talk:The Origin of the Work of Art

message: :"Heidegger drafted the text between 1935 and 1937, reworking it for publication in 1950 and again in 1960. Heidegger based his article on a series of lectures he had previously delivered in Zurich and Frankfurt during the 1930s."
There are some drafts of this work in the Heidegger Studies (Heidegger-Studies 5, 1989, p. 5-22) that Heidegger himself claimes to be written in 1931/32 (See Martin Heidegger / Elisabeth Blochmann, Joachim Storck (Hrsg.): Briefwechsel 1918-1968, Marbach 1989, p. 87.). As far as I know he then did one lecture in Freiburg 1935 (not Zürich) and after that three lectures in Frankfurt am Main 1936, these three were used for publication. -- Tischbeinahe (talk) φιλο 08:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: The discussion launched by Schapiro is rather underplayed and far from neutral. It is not known when Heidegger scribbled in the margin of the Reclam edition (first of 1960) a continuation to the sentence 'we cannot tell where these shoes stand': 'nor whom they belong to', an addition that later editions take care to mention, as Schapiro noted in a postcript (1980).91.92.179.172 (talk) 17:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence and criticism 

message: I'm not opposed to having a quotation from Heidegger in this article, but quotations of any kind just don't belong at the very top of an article. It looks very strange and inappropriate. The quotation should be shifted if it is to remain in the article. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation 

message: All but two sentences, minor points of the article, are based on an editor's interpretation of the essay. For this reason, the article has no credibility. My point is separate from any question of whether this editor's personal view is correct (I offer no opinion).
Somewhere in Wikipedia guidelines can be found a more full discussion of primary sources and how to use them. At any rate, there are ENTIRE BOOKS written about this essay.
2600:1702:39A0:3720:A9F5:EEA5:B81B:B58F (talk) 16:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary Sources
Talk:Wardour Street

message: He arrived in the article with this diff by a very dodgy ISP. I can find no traces of him on the web, except in versions of this sentence, no doubt nearly all from WP. However, one of these, from an utterly non-specialist but academic source, seems to predate the mention here.  I'm very dubious about him, certainly as an "architect", as I doubt that buildings in Wardour St between the 1680s & 1720 needed or received much attention from an architect, and very few London streets are renamed after an architect who has added some buildings. If he existed, it seems more likely he was the developer, but it is odd there are no other references to him at all on the web, except as the architect of "several buildings" on this street.  Johnbod (talk) 12:25, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Given that the IP made an edit of a silly name to another article and "THIS SCHOOL IS RUBBISH", three minutes later, I think it's safe to cut this. --McGeddon (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Encyclopedia of London says Edward Wardour owned land there, which makes more sense. Johnbod (talk) 20:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The phantom Sir Archibald Wardour 

message: Is there a source for this claim (and maybe even a digital version of that map?) Trublu (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  source for 1585 map description?
Talk:Bishop Barrington Academy

message: Stub, and a very solid stub at that. Needs to add history and special information to it to become start class. Low importance, little spoken here about any real notability. Twenty Years 08:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but when you say, "Low importance, little spoken ... about any real notability", are you referring to the article, or the school?
St91 21:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Praga E.114

message: It seems HB-UAF is the last airworthy E-114.  It's the only one on the 2010 Euro registers and it would be nice to know if it is active.  I think it is, perhaps after a period of restoration but have found nothing citeable.  It's marked airworthy on List of historical aircraft in Switzerland but the link to the source document is broken and I've not yet got it working.  That list is dated 2008.  There is also a photo here of 'AF on the tarmac at Pardubice looking airworthy (and very smart) dated May 2010.  It seems it is in private hands. I doubt this image is citable, though if anyone has an aerial shot it probably would be, with the date in the EXIF file. But there might be written reports of visits to shows, perhaps this summer, which we could use.  Any thoughts?TSRL (talk) 20:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last flyer 
Talk:Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (all material are paraphrased and cited to the original source with additional sources from the medical school's affiliate. This program is a unique aspect to the medical school, which must be summarized. All Disambiguated issues with the table were addressed in the new edit. As one of US's largest medical schools, LECOM's Wikipedia page must remain to inform the public about it; the content may be reviewed, but having the page deleted will simply take real life information off of Wikipedia) --ORdeDocsaab (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Cas Mudde

message: Please would an interested editor assess the alternative version written at User:C mon/sandbox in 2015, incorporate what is useful, blank that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 09:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft
Talk:Eurovision Dance Contest 2008

message: So now there's people talking about possible participations from Vatican City and Algeria and Saudi Arabia and Canada (ok that was an exaggeration).. But PLEASE, do not write all the Active EBU members as possible participants.. I don't think the EBU would allow more than 20 countries at the competition because otherwise the show would last 3 hrs and they might have to cut down the 1-7 voting.. Plus, you shouldn't be already confirming the participation of all the 16 participants.. They might have sign a contract but they can always withdraw (Just like Poland did at the JESC 2005 despite of signing a 3 year contract) Israel already confirmed, United Kingdom will surely be in shall they host, Finland might not even need a confirmation. There are only chances that another country might join (say Cyprus) or that a country withdraws (say Switzerland). So, don't jump onto conclusions so soon.. There's still a year ahead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony0106 (talk • contribs) 08:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here we go again 

message: How Switzerland can withdraw if all countries which participated in 2007, signed contract for two years and they must to participate this year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.57.211.22 (talk) 10:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switzerland withdraws? 
Talk:Airgun Designs

message: I added info about the different models of mags, then I realized there was a separate page for that, doh! But I think they should stay there, because that's really AGD's main thing. I will also be updating the Automag page today or tomorrow, so compared to the AGD page they will have much more info and detail.
Wikidiego 23:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kenneth P. Williams

message: Sentences like "He is far too fond of Grant to be entirely balanced." need to be rewritten to make the tone more neutral. --NeilN 23:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not up to Wikipedia editors to make these judgements and add them to articles.  Criticisms of particular works can be noted if a proper reference to a credible third party is provided. --NeilN 04:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Para Handy

message: If someone wants to add an episode guide to the TV series, details can be found of some on the BBC website  --jmb 23:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TV series

message: As his forename is Peter, why is his nickname Para if this is the Gaelic equivalent of Paddy, i.e. Patrick? Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Pàdraig is used in Scottish Gaelic as an equivalent both for Patrick and Peter - see eg here, p 715 (the page unluckily restricted in Google Books) or here - and Para is shortened from Pàdraig. --Duncan MacCall (talk) 18:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Or more accurately, Patrick is an Anglicisation of Pàdraig.  Pàdraig is derived from Peadar, the Gaelicisation of the Greek Petros or its Latin equivalent Petrus.  The "-aig" in Pàdraig was originally equivalent to the "-ie" or "-y" in something like "Jamie", "Billy" etc.  It's probably only because of St Patrick that the name Pàdraig became accepted as a "proper" name rather than a variant form (consider that only a couple of generations ago, birth certificates would all have said "Terence" rather than "Terry", "Patricia" rather than "Patsie" or "Joseph" rather than "Joe", whereas these days the colloquial form is accepted).Prof Wrong (talk) 20:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course Saint Patrick was British, or at least of the Romano-British culture – as Para would have it, "wan o Brutain's hardy sons". So presumably the name was originally either Latin or perhaps more probably a Brittonic (early old Welsh) version of Petrus. Perhaps it gained something in translation into Irish language. . . dave souza, talk 21:06, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Para 

message: Cluthas were not chain ferries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.108.139 (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, thanks! We should really have a Clutha ferry article. . dave souza, talk 08:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cluthas

message: My reading of the Para Handy stories was that they were as much about the writer's gullibility as the characters themselves -- ie that the reporter was taking as fact the "tall tales" of a stereotypical seaman.... Prof Wrong (talk) 11:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Jinks or Tall Tales? 

message: This section is a bit odd, as it makes it seem that the 1992 collection is the first, even though it then names the separate volumes of stories, which were in themselves collections. Does anyone have the information on how the stories were first collected and sold, and when they came together into the larger collections we have today? My first contact was a volume of my dad’s, which had the Para Handy tales, Erchie and Jimmy Swann; I know that more up-to-date volumes have brought together the original collections with tales which did not get anthologized, but I have neither my original book, nor the new collections to hand to add information. Jock123 (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published collections…
Talk:Catherine Carlson

message: I think this needs to go to AfD, at the very least. On my reading of WP:JUDGE, she would indeed be presumed notable, as she is a judge of a provincewide court, which is specifically covered by that notability guideline:
"The following are presumed to be notable:
Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature".
I will de-PROD all the articles of judges of provincial courts for the same reason. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD removal
Talk:Catherine Hagel

message: I was reading this and I noticed most off the article is linked. It makes it hard to read. Some of them are not necessary. Minnesota is linked 3 times. I'm going to delete some of them but if somebody changes it back I'll let it go. --Npnunda (talk) 00:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does This page have to many [[wikilinks]]? 
Talk:Catherine Siachoque

message: Catherine Siachoque was not the protagonist in La Casa de al Lado; just a major character.  The protagonists were Gabriel Porras and Maritza Rodriguez.  See the summary of the story at the LCDAL forum of Telenovela-World. (EnochBethany (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: CS Not Protag in LCDAL
Talk:HMNZS Taranaki

message: An image of a gun turret is not acceptable as an infobox image. The infobox image is for an image of the entire vessel or as much of the vessel as can fit in a picture. Any more detailed images are more than welcome in the article, but not in the infobox. Following the Manuaul of Style is paramount and having an image of a turret in the spot where readers are expecting an image of the ship is wholly inappropriate. -MBK004 03:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Crossroads Mall (Nebraska)

message: First of all, we don't do lists of anchor stores; that should be in the text. Second of all, searching "Crossroads Mall" + "Omaha" + "Kids 'R' Us" gives no hits at all. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "We" do do lists of anchors. Its routine among these mall articles. Until its covered in the MoS let's not arbitrarily decide what "we" do and don't do. Second, why single out one store in making your point? • Freechildtalk 02:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Anchors and tenants specifically says "Do not put the anchor stores in a list format." This has been agreed upon by silent consensus in countless other articles; see for instance Walden Galleria, a GA mall article which does NOT have an anchor list. Current and past anchors are both in the text already, so a list is redundant. I have no idea how you think my actions are arbitrary. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: TenPoundHammer, you put the words "Do not put the anchor stores in a list format" into WP:ANC yourself - those words were not part of the consensus that lead to WP:ANC. I think the determination of whether anchor stores should be in the text, in a list or in a chart, or excluded completely, should best be decided in the context of each article. Admittedly, many anchor stores are shown as lists when it is unnecessary to do so (it would be better to mention them in the text). The main rule when it comes to anchors is that they be verifiable - i.e. there needs to be a reliable source identifying them as anchors, not some Wikipedia editor's own personal assessment as to what constitutes an anchor. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Kids "R" Us

message: There was a survey business located in the mall for years. Shoppers would be randomly selected to participate in in-person surveys about particular products, new product ideas or product enhancements. This was a keystone experience of shopping at Crossroads, either by taking a survey or dodging the survey takers who would stand in the hallways looking for volunteers. The survey business was located in the basement near the food court along the original corridor. I don't know specific dates that the business operated, but I know first-hand that people were taking surveys in the mid to late 1980s. If more detailed information can be found about it, for example dates it operated, I think it is well worth including in the general article. I believe the business was eventually shut down because the survey takers were creating an unpleasant experience for shoppers. 68.235.243.192 (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey Business