lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Winter Hill (North West England)

message: I think Lord Leverhulme's house, gardens etc should come under Rivington rather than Winter Hill --jmb 22:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's worth mentioning here.  Have reworded slightly.  Lancsalot 15:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Leverhulme

message: The history section states that "(t)he hill is believed to have been inhabited over 2,500 years ago, as a flint arrow head was found in the area that dated from that era," before pointing out that "(s)everal Bronze Age burial mounds have been located also." Should this be 2,500 BC rather than 2,500 years ago? Theelf29 15:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History section

message: Why is the Murphy Incident linked to the Men in Black page where there is no mention of it? Richerman (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Murphy Incident 

message: I put a refimprove tag on this article only to have it removed the same day. The whole point of these tags is to alert the casual reader that the information may not be reliable and to, hopefully, get the article improved. I would be grateful if you would leave the tag there until proper references have been added to the article. Wikipedia articles should be made up of verifiable facts, not unsourced statements. Richerman (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refimprove tag 

message: Just a note that Winter Hill lies on the boundary of the Metropolitan Borough of Bolton and the Borough of Chorley and in this capacity is divided between Greater Manchester and Lancashire. The TV mast is on the Lancashire side of the boundary. Just thought this deserved a mention here as there has been a bit of confusion added in the article in the past. Boundaries are verified by using this from the Ordnance Survey. --Jza84 |  Talk   15:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Manchester 

message: Regarding the claim that the A Certain Ratio track features a "low pitched drone which alternates between two notes a whole tone apart for the entire length of the song" - having listened to this I just wanted to point out that the interval in the song is in fact a minor third - an interval one semitone larger than a whole tone.  Can't comment on what interval the equipment on the hill produces though :)  194.24.251.17 (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical pedantry
Talk:Manapa-Tarhunta

message: This article is about Manapa-Tarhunta, King of Seha River during the reign of Mursili II.
Manapa-Tarhunta had a long career prior to the accession of Kupanta-KAL / -Kurunta to the throne of Mira (when the Manapa-Tarhunta letter was written). He is mentioned in Mursili II's annals and also in several of that king's treaties with the western states, not just of his home Seha River Land but also Mira and even Hapalla and Wilusa.
I hadn't even heard of the Manapa-Tarhunta Letter when I added the events surrounding him into the ongoing "Arzawa Page" (not on Wiki). You could use this article as background to the letter, and it'd be good for that; but it's also background for Mursili II's annals and for any number of events relevant to Seha River (and to nearby lands like Lesbos and Troy) at this time. (Zimriel 22:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The purpose of this article
Talk:The Roof (Back in Time)

message: Anyone who has the album would know that the song is actually simply called "The Roof". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.8 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 29 May 2006.
:The single release is not "occasionally" titled "The Roof (Back in Time)"; every track listing for the single I've read lists it with that subtitle (see, for example, ). Extraordinary Machine 21:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So are you saying that the article should be moved to The Roof? (Or possibly The Roof (song), as there are films and other things titled "The Roof".) Extraordinary Machine 20:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, done. Extraordinary Machine 21:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, but I'm about to turn it into a disambiguation page. Also, in the infobox the title should be written as "The Roof (Back in Time)", because that's what it was called when it was released as a single and the infobox is an infobox for singles. Extraordinary Machine 19:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not actual name
Talk:List of Wild Cards characters

message: The link for the character Mr. Nobody redirects to that of a real person, Philip Staufen. If there was an article for that wildcards character was it renamed? If so, the link should be updated.--65.113.254.236 22:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: lol, it's corrected now. Also, feel free to create one or more of the missing articles if you feel like it. --Kristbg 00:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected character 

message: I see that Water Lily (Wild Cards) has been tagged for deletion for  reasons. I think we should move it into this list, along with all the shorter articles about Wild Cards characters. See Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) for the currently recommended approach. This would be a drastic change to this article.
Does anybody agree? Disagree? Volunteer to do the merging? Please respond here. Cheers, CWC 12:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest lots of merges here 

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: The article on Wraith does not mention what I believe is her first appearance as a teenager in Wild Cards I, "Ghost Girl". In that story she uses her ability for the first time, I believe.
Isn't the Jennifer in "Ghost Ghirl" identical to Wraith?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.178.208.197 (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wraith 

message: Is there a reason not to include new characters, e.g. Curveball and Earth Witch?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokol (talk • contribs) 17:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason, I'm sure, it's simply that no one has done it.  Some of the older characters, such as Lohengrin, are not present either.  72.182.33.219 (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Characters?
Talk:Wings University Tour

message: Ticket price was £50!?  That's much higher than it must have been, no?   Wasted Time R 15:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ticket price?

message: The band was NOT called Wings for this tour - this was a name they decided on later. Although it was no more than a jokey reference, they called themselves Suzy & The Red Stripes, though this may have only been for the Linda number they played.
Also, at Birmingham at any rate, where I saw them - they did NOT turn up "unannounced"; they phoned up at very short notice, maybe just a few hours. It was enough time for word to spread like lightning among halls of residence and bedsit-land. There was a packed out Debating Hall in the Students Union, which meant between 1,000 and 1,500 students.79.69.10.75 (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name correction, and another correction
Talk:Tommy Moran

message: Moran's Bio Data is quite sparse and hard to find. I found one blog Looking for Tommy Moran that asserted that:
Tommy Moran was born at number 7, Raglan Place, Elswick (Elswick,_Tyne_and_Wear), in Newcastle`s old west end, on the 12th of December 1900. Parents, John and Mary Ann, were both originally from the west of Ireland.
John was working as a driller-hand in the shipyards
No source is given. Can anyone come up with anything better? DadaNeem (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moran's Bio Data
Talk:In propria persona

message: I think this is something distinct and separate from pro se, but I'm not a lawyer. Does it mean something different in real estate, for example?  --Mashford 22:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are essentially the same.  The two terms are just used in different judicial systems.  I vote for keeping both articles up, but redirecting all similar articles to those two, namely, pro se and In propria persona.Bearian 19:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:Knock (short story)

message: Seeing as I'm too tired to carry on, I hope some other Wikipedian can fulfill the task of inserting whatever appropriate mention of "Knock" from my blog... It's being derived from an article on New Wave (science fiction) from a 1984 issue of Asimov's Science Fiction.
If done well enough, the two articles should tie-in nicely with each other. DrWho42 22:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Asimov's Science Fiction]] mention 

message: The word "alone" could be omitted from the story. As it was written, the story is unecessarily long.
: I disagree. The story's twist revolves around the author's expectation that, in the time and culture that he wrote the tale, most people would interpret "last man" to mean "last human being" (and not literally "last man"). Without the word "alone" it comes across as sloppily sexist. In fact the word is crucial to setting up the story's twist ending. If anything could be chopped off it would be "in a room", but even that would be iffy; without those words the door comes out of nowhere. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  If the door comes out of nowhere if the room isn't mentioned, the man comes out of nowhere because his mother isn't mentioned. Am I being sexist again?--Odd M. Nilsen (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is pretty much the shortest horror story ever (first 2 lines) and many will consider this as sexist because of the fact that maybe it might have been Grace, who came back to appreciate his proposal. Am I Right? -Araesoawesome (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary criticism 

message: With respect to the original author, most of the original article was incorrect.  The seventeen-word short-short story was not published as a standalone story; "Knock" is several-thousand-word story about Walter Phelan, a story that begins with a description of the quoted two-sentence story.  The audio versions are adaptations of the full story; they didn't invent the Walter Phelan/alien zoo stuff.  I have thoroughly rewritten the article (and removed some phrases that didn't make any sense) to match the actual story, which I have here in front of me in the NESFA Press book From These Ashes: The complete Short SF of Fredric Brown. --Elysdir 04:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely rewrote article for accuracy 

message: The redirect Knock (short story has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 18:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Knock (short story]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bibi Ka Maqbara

message: added 3 categories and 1 new link, fixed awkward sentence structure in descriptive paragraph, added that the translated name is 'Tomb of the Lady'. (verified by link ).
There is still some info that is inconsistent: the new link indicates that the mother's name is not 'Dilras Bano Begam' but 'Rabia Durani' (i did not change this in the wiki article). Also the original wiki article said that the monument was built in 1660, but the new link says that it was built in 1679. I doubt the building was built in only one year, so as a compromise i put that it was built in the 'late 17th century'.
Dostoyevskydork 22:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Do not use obscure Indian numerical terms that nobody outside the subcontinent understands.  As currently written, I'm not sure how to rewrite it using standard numbers ("several tens of millions" is awkward), but somebody who knows the exact number should fix this. john k (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crores? 

message: The Bibi ka Maqbara was built by Prince Azam Shah son of Aurangzeb contrary to what article says. See Gooogle Books results -  ,  Also Arechological Survey board :File:BKM Board.jpg  confirms it- I am busy right now so leaving a note - will change the facts later. Jethwarp (talk) 16:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built by Azam Shah not Aurangzeb 

message: My 124.66.169.122 (talk) 13:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibi ka maqbara
Talk:Suikoden III

message: since chris is one of the heroes i added her to * List of computer and video games with female protagonists should we add the list of computer and video games with female protaganists somewhere in the article?- hotspot
:It seems like a relatively minor point that someone could discover with Special:Whatlinkshere. --GargoyleMT 04:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: should we put a see also in?

message: The article was assessed start as it was deficient in sources and coverage was too detailed. It should be trimmed. Boneyard90 (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP: Japan Assessment Commentary 
Talk:Have You Seen This Snail (Where's Gary?)

message: The real title is Have You Seen This Snail and I have proof.
*The title card is the TRUE episode name.  Where's Gary? was what the commercials kept on calling the upcoming special.  Just like SpongeBob B.C. (called SpongeBob Goes Prehistoric) and Dunces and Dragons (called Lost in Time) So, since the title card tells what the episode name is, that name should be written first, with the other name in parintheses. -AMK152 19:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1979 in British music

message: I beleive that the subject itself does not meet the criteria under WP:NOT in that wikipedia is not: Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics. Nothing personal, but this is an encyclopedia. I will not pursue this matter further myself, although other wikipedians may do the same thing later. HighInBC 17:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears to be part of a British music history series. Added wikify tag. Probably needs a 70s template like the 80s one too. ::Supergolden:: 10:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It does appear to be part of a series, although most of the others appear to have paragraphs at the top describing the "list".JByrd 20:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I added the delete tag 

message: I have changed the reference to 1979 being the biggest year ever for single sales in the UK, to 'Biggest ever year for physical format Singles sales'. 2009 now holds the record for most singles(physical and digital). 
Ok, my edits arent showing up, when I click 'edit' (on main page) they are there, but when viewing the main page, its still the old page. 
source. Metafis (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest selling year no longer valid
Talk:Bronislav Kaminski

message: This article makes Kaminski look too benign. --Ch.Zalka 85.2.220.57 15:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: please check the german page of this topic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.74.207.198 (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Why do Norman Davies and Andrew Borowiec in their books on the Warsaw Uprising call him Mieczysław Kaminski? DrKiernan (talk) 09:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I don't see why he merits inclusion in the Polish military taskforce. Such projects are not usually for their opponents (i.e. fighting in Poland and against Poland does not make every every such soldier important to Poland). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:22, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland-importance 

message: Kaminski's conviction in a court martial seems to be outdated info, as well as that he was "executed for war crimes" that I seem to have seen elsewhere. Germany and the Second World] says that circumstances of his death remain unclear. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. Sources give conflicting accounts on this matter.Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: In text there is information that his name is sometimes "(also transliterated German-style as "Bronislaw")". 
That's not true, Bronisław is just polish name, Bronislav is English transliteration from Russian. Because he was ethnic Pole, name Bronisław is correct for him, however as he identifed himself as a Russian, name Bronislav is also correct. 
So please, delete this "(also transliterated German-style as "Bronislaw")" and write instead "(or Bronisław in Polish)". 2A01:11BF:529:7D00:ED2F:DBCF:E52D:37DA (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Bronislaw
Talk:Wedding favors

message: My wife was talking to a friend who is getting married, and asked me to find a page on the web to describe what a wedding favour was, as this friend hadnt heard of them.  So this page was very useful.  However I then started out correcting a typo (complement for compliment) but there are a few more things on this page that worry me if it is to be an encyplopedia entry.  It may just be someone else's writing style but the author should be a little more precise in their language, for example:
-- "dates back to the beginning of time" and "the first...favor ...common among European aristocrats" are somewhat incompatible statements... perhaps something like "common throughout recorded history" would be better although even a statement like this needs a little research - did the Romans and Ancient Egyptians use them?  European aristocracy arose somewhat later;
-- I thought confetti was the stuff the guests threw at the bride and groom after the ceremony - almonds seem a little heavy for this! However I dont claim any expertise on this subject so for all I know, confetti did start off this way(?).  OK, the linked article on confetti cleared this up for me, so ignore this point perhaps;
-- I doubt the line "...favors have become an intricate and necessary part of wedding plannning".  Quite likely they are very common these days in many countries, but hardly "necessary"... surely a matter of personal choice?
-- the statement that "favors... as important as the bride's dress...".  My wife was quite keen on having favours at our wedding, but I don't think she would have gone this far... if money had been tight, I don't think the dress was going to be cut back!
IanB 22:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the particular points you make have been addressed by another editor.  On confetti check out the wikipedia article and you'll see that that your guess that it did start out as sugar coated almonds is correct!  It's an Italian term I think.   There are still some definite problems with this article in it's style and lack of sources.  If you can help make it better - dive on in! --SiobhanHansa 18:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Complement is a different word than compliment.  It means to "accent" (as opposed to "praise") --Logisti 09:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions about content of article
Talk:Revenue recognition

message: Agreed, IFRS should factor in somewhere, but as an accounting student I have to say it was a pretty accurate and comprehensive summary - go over typical methods, etc. A bit of a focus on some typical revenue rec manipulations may be useful. --Ldipaolo (talk) 00:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So why has it taken you guys more than a year to do something about it? JanCeuleers (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revenue recognition principle

message: Who created this topic 102.89.42.16 (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realization account 

message: The version on Wikipedia is a bit outdated, revenue recognition under IFRS15 now uses the contract method to recognize revenue. Not sure if it's ok to clear out the section and put in the steps, it might also be too long and overly technical. ACasualEditor97 (talk) 23:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IFRS15 CURRENT STATE
Talk:Polish Legions in World War I

message: Quoting and translating from Urbankowski (Józef Piłsudski, t.1, p.186): "Piłsudski wanted an uprising and his followers saw him as its leader. Austia wanted to control and restrain him, endecja and conservatives, suprised by the sudden turn of events, wanted to neutralize Piłsudski's influence - and hence the Legions were born". In essense it was a formation not planned nor desired by anybody before its formation, a compromise, a "lesser evil" for all concerned :) Just something to shine a little light on how national myths are born... The name was probably first used on 14 August during in a speach by Hipolit Śliwiński, talking about second-hand information brought by then president of Kraków, Juliusz Leo, from Vienna. The date of creation is somewhat murky and controversial; Austrian government gave official permission on 27 August, but Piłsudski used the name in a dispatch to his soldiers on 22 August. Interestingly, Piłsudski cited non-existing agreements and bodies, propping the spirit of his small force with what we could easily call propaganda... :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  00:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Formation

message: https://www.polin.pl/en/news/2014/11/25/jew-pole-legionary-1914-1920 Xx236 (talk) 09:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 648 Jews https://ciekawostkihistoryczne.pl/2018/01/31/zydzi-w-legionach-pilsudskiego-ilu-ich-bylo-i-czy-naprawde-walczyli-za-polske/ Xx236 (talk) 12:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jews