lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Woody Paige

message: As a reminder, if the neutrality of this article is disputed, please use a neutrality template and hold a discussion on the talk page, instead of reverting and changing on your own. --Wavemaster447 00:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Can we get a good picture of Woody up here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.144.106 (talk) 00:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I found an ESPN bio that should suffice to reference his being a panelist on Around the Horn so that that one-sentence section can lose its "unreferenced" tag: here. Is this uncontroversial enough for me or some other admin to add it? Yngvadottir (talk) 11:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots  17:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Around the Horn 

message: This page was fully-protected late last July, due to years-long disruption including disruption by barely-autoconfirmed accounts that could get around semi- and pending-changes protection.
I recommend that in early August 2016,  or another administrator experimentally reduce the edit protection to semi-protection for a year.  If there is disruption that gets past the semi-protection it can be upgraded again.
Sidebar comment: This is one of those cases where I wish pending changes level 2 had not been rejected by the community. PC2 would be far better than full protection for this page, while serving the needs of the community by largely removing the motivation to vandalize the page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:52, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection 

message: Remove persondata. Persondata has been deprecated since May 2015 by this RfC.
MB298 (talk) 20:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 21:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 30 January 2016 

message: I propose that the section read :
Paige is a frequent panelist on the ESPN sports roundtable Around the Horn (existing citation).  He has appeared on the show, and won the show, more frequently than any other ATH panelist.  Paige is noted for bringing a chalkboard with jocular puns to Around the Horn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplebackpack89 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 18 March 2016‎ (UTC)
: Not done for now:  Do you have a citation for the second and third sentences? We probably shouldn't put things in the article that don't satisfy WP:V. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of "Around the Horn" section. 

message: *Missing title needs to be added to this citation: Vince Bzdek (July 30, 2016). The Gazette http://gazette.com/renowned-sports-columnist-woody-paige-joining-the-gazette/article/1581565. Missing or empty |title= (help)
*Title to add:  Renowned sports columnist Woody Paige joining The Gazette. 
LPW22 (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done DRAGON BOOSTER  ★ 06:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 June 2017
Talk:Princess Shikishi

message: I propose moving to Shikishi Naishinnō, and redirecting there from Shikishi Naishinno.  Any comments?  Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 22:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Oh No It Isn't!

message: The nature of the ongoing Benny New Adventures raises issues for the book infobox. Said infobox is labelled "Dr Who books", but Oh No It Isn't! isn't a Dr Who book. Then again, should Oh No It Isn't! be numbered 1 (as it currently is) or as 62 (it was the 62nd New Adventure and Virgin were keen to stress continuity)? Bondegezou 09:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Trugo

message: There's a bit more information in this article now, but it probably needs to be divided into sections and to have the history fleshed out more.  At what point does this article cease to be a stub? Colonel Tom 22:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has now been expanded upon and should be reclassified as it no longer fits the category of 'stub'.  Astaga100 (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this still a stub?

message: The report cited at the end of sentence 1, that is, the Hobsons Bay report does not say Trugo was "invented" in the Newport Rail Yards. It says Trugo is "said to have been invented". The Hobsons Bay report does not give any authority for this statement. My conversations with present day players (2012) leads me to observe that the story that workers in the Newport yards played a game involving mallets, doughnut shaped shock absorbers from rolling stock buffers and some form of goal has widespread currency. Unfortunately, this oral tradition is not supported by any documentary evidence other than reportage of accounts from various individuals. MickeyG56 (talk) 16:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. There are no primary sources that connect the game of Trugo to the Newport Railway Workshops. Even secondary sources that refer to the connection  seem relatively recent e.g. 1980s (?). However, given the current strong oral tradition I traced various elements of the story back through media reports from the1950s to the 1940s and then placed it in the context of Thomas Grieves biography and I now believe Trugo's history does lead back to the Victorian Railway's activities in Newport. At this stage, 'inspired by activities at the Newport Railway Workshops' seems the safest way to go. I hope to expand on these connections in a history of Trugo that I'm currently researching.  Astaga100 (talk) 22:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence - origins of Trugo 
Talk:Fort Frances

message: The page for the Coat of Arms seems unnessecary. The information on its page isn't even a paragraph, and could easily be covered in the original town's article. --Swiftblade21 22:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fort Francians maybe better then Franceites.--Picard102 21:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nom 

message: The John McLoughlin article mentions that he was in charge of the Lac la Pluie district, i.e. fur district... - I've redirected Lac la Pluie to Rainy Lake for now, taking it literally, as unlike Columbia District or New Caledonia there does not appear to be a separate article on the fur district; there maybe for Athabasca District but I haven't looked at that link.  Now, obviously the boundaries of the modern Rainy River District are probably not the same as that of the Lac la Pluie District but this would seem to be the same area; which begs the question - was Fort Frances the headquarters of the fur district?  For now I'll leave it at that, as this is a modern municipal article, but if there's a better place to redirect the mention of "Lac la Pluie district" to, it would probably help out with any fur trade history articles which happen to mention it; if any Ontario editors are working on fur-era history it might be worth coordinating with editors farther west; it's a big topic in early BC, and while most Prairie fur history is condensed into Hudson's Bay Company and North West Company it's rich ground for someone interested in historical article-writing....Skookum1 (talk) 02:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HBC fort & fur district

message: ... the town held a big centennial celebration in 2003.
:— How big was it? Sca (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Centennial
Talk:National Aviation Hall of Fame

message: Someone needs to add Dennis E Fitch to this page.  Anyone know what year he was inducted?  He was the Training Captain who helped the crew land United flight 232.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodchild (talk • contribs) 09:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The only source for his induction around the web seems to be Fitch's own article on Wikipedia, as there is no sign of his alleged induction on NAHF's own pages.  So I think noone "needs to add Dennis E Fitch".  And why would he be inducted instead of, say Haynes or Records? Paaln (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lil Rob

message: I think the user who placed the tag is a little miffed at one of his articles being tagged accordingly - see Alex Roupenian for history.Gilesbennett 09:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: rm'ed, as the article asserts at least some notability.  --Sigma 7 11:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion tag

message: Can anyone confirm how the song "Chrome And Paint" Remix is obtainable? I can only add this song to the discography if I know the source. ElMeroEse 17:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: Can anyone find it? --IdLoveOne (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate?

message: i love ma vato lil rob para siempre.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.64.164 (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  drepression makes obssesion 1218 

message: ey lil rob,                                                                                                                                          Just want to let you know that your such a amazing person an u have such a positive impact in ma life i just got to give the thanks to your sister yvonne cauze if it wasent for her i probably never had herd of you.i wish you the best of luck to you an your girlfriend an the two lil girls.ur FAN no.001  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.64.164 (talk) 22:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  my lil vato 

message: This story addresses the internet rumor about his death and flatly denies it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 09:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  False rumor 

message: The producer Lil' Rob who is also the producer for a lot of Murder Inc affiliate projects redirects here which obviously shouldn't since its not the same person. 
At least have some type of disambiguation or note at the top of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.84.206.86 (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer for Murder INC
Talk:SurveyUSA

message: I use the sampling of names and electoral count and I believe that I see partisan. LILVOKA 14:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Partisan

message: More than half the links in this article are directly from SurveyUSA.  While the link identified as the company's web site is legitimate, there is a strong question of POV about links to "stories" and "analyses" of its accuracy come from it. -- Couillaud (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External "Links"
Talk:Chilango

message: Defeño or defequense is not derogatory at all. It is common to see people from other states use the state they were born in and the ending "ense". ie. people from Durango are Duranguense, Mexico State, Mexiquense. Defeñense doesnt make sense, hence Defeño is what people from Mexico DF call themselves. It is far from derogatory. It is used because Chilango is considered by some people born in Mexico City as invadors, people not from Mexico CIty that move there looking to work but end up stealing and commiting crimes due to the lack of jobs.  However, most Mexicans from the 31 Mexican states do not make any distinction whatsoever about residents of Mexico that were born in Mexico City or those that moved there and call all residents of Mexico City "Chilangos", even "Chilanguillos" an even more derogatory term.  It should be noted that many residents of Mexico City left this city after the 1985 earthquake that devastated it, and that it was them who committed innumerable crimes in the Mexican states to which they moved.{{unsigned|65.112.161.163}
:Moved from the main article page--Rockero 23:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone's comment

message: THE WHOLE PUBLICATION IS A PIECE OF GARBAGE, CHILANGO IS ANYONE WHO RESIDES IN MEXICO CITY, BUT WAS NOT BORN IN MEXICO CITY,  EVEN ALEX LORA A WELL KNOW MUSICIAN IN MEXICO WROTE A SONG CALLED "CHILANGO INCONPRENDIDO" IN WHICH  HE TELL HIS STORY AS BEING BORN IN PUEBLA, MEXICO AND HAVING IMMIGRATE TO MEXICO CITY,
CHILANGO INCONPRENDIO
CHILANGO, DEFIQUENSE POR NECESIDAD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroSectasMexicanas (talk • contribs) 01:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don´t think it´s a piece of garbage. There are these two cultural uses of the word "chilango" as the article mentions- For people living in Mexico City (from anywhere) or people who are Mexico City born and bread. That´s common usage.MazzyEstrella (talk) 16:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  THE WHOLE PUBLICATION IS A PIECE OF GARBAGE 

message: "Make fatherland"? Really? Who is still using babelfish to translate colloquial expressions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gipxypirate (talk • contribs) 00:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really, gentlemen? 

message: It cant be that derogatory. we have a restaurant in the SFBay Area called "el rinconcito chilango", who would name a restaurant with the term if it was too insulting to the people from mexico city.108.94.3.58 (talk) 23:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Derogatory
Talk:Texas state highway system

message: Does anyone know exactly when TXDOT adopted the toll shields? --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 08:12, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The majority of these exist already. , , ect...--Holderca1 20:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Those aren't state owned or maintained.  That is the reason they not on the page.  Though they do deserve a mention. --Holderca1 12:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Toll shield

message: What is the policy/common practice for writing articles about FM/RM roads that have been entirely converted to Urban Roads?  Should the article be called Urban Road ### or should it retain the Farm to Market Road ### title and the article mention that its technical classification is UR?  I think having the actual article titled Urban Road would be better, since that's the actual name of the road, but having the FM name redirect.  Perhaps I'm just overthinking this entirely? Wyv 00:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban roads? 

message: I added a reference to a Google Maps link in the History section for TX-66.  Can someone refine this reference link?  I'm not sure how to do it.  Thought I had it but what I did didn't work. Erzahler (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference template
Talk:Texas State Highway Loop 1

message: MoPac doesn't have 18-wheelers.  What are the details on this?
There aren't many 18-wheelers on MoPac because the roadway isn't helpful to them. For North-South traffic, MoPac, until yesterday, did not connect to IH-35 via viable highways for that route.Kraft 16:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas State Highway Loop 9

message: On older maps (approx. 30 years old) I've seen Loop 9 indicated as a proposed route. One Dallas city map showed a portion of Grand Prairie, in which a surface street was already called "Loop 9". Presumably this street was a segment of the proposed route. I no longer have the map or I would be more specific. I am guessing that the Loop 9 street was renamed during the time that the Loop 9 project was dormant (I had assumed the project was abandoned years ago). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 17:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Having just looked at a Google map, I think this street is now called "W Freeway St." -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Texas State Highway Loop 12

message: The infobox might not be complete, but it is accurate (please disregard my edit summary). Dirtydan667 08:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Northwest Highway is a road that Loop 12 happens to run along.  After losing its Loop 12 designation in the east at Buckner Boulevard, it continues east to Belt Line Road in Mesquite.  In the west, after it loses the Loop 12 designation at Walton Walker, it continues west into Irving where it becomes Carpenter Freeway ( SH 114).
Likewise, Ledbetter Drive continues to the west after it loses its designation to S Walton Walker Boulevard west past Duncanville Road and then north to Kiest Boulevard (SH Spur 303).
Anyway, these roads themselves are separate entities.. drumguy8800 C T 22:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong Oppose. The roads themselves aren't notable enough without the Loop 12 designation.  If anything use  to link to those articles, but this article should remain intact. --Holderca1 17:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose. There is more to Loop 12 than NW Hwy and Ledbetter: Buckner and Walton Walker. I don't think breaking up the article would be a disservice, and each of those roads is not very significant in and of itself. 68.95.142.239 01:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose.  The other portions of Northwest Highway are also state roads, which would have their own entries, and Ledbetter Drive outside of Loop 12 is a local road of no significance. 160.147.240.6 12:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I live in the area and would be happy to take photos for the article.  Any idea of what specific things should be photographed (Major intersections, Long shots of the road, etc.)  I'll probably do some this weekend if people will let me know what they want to see. Hasteur (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've attached the 75 & Loop 12 (Northwest Highway) picture to the article.  Removing the photo request.  If people want more intersections, ask. Hasteur (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Request 

message: On the complete article page, the word "Dallas" appears on the left edge of the map, outside the city limits. If you click on the map, "Dallas" appears in the correct spot. Would someone with proper expertise please fix that? ManlyMatt (talk) 02:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dallas" on map
Talk:Texas State Highway 2

message: I oppose the merge proposal, while a portion of the route was replaced by US 81 (which has since been replaced by I-35), the eastern leg was not.  --Holderca1 01:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with Holderca1. Merging the article with US 81 would create an awkward position where the eastern branch would need to be covered in an article that has nothing to do with the east leg. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 01:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Texas State Highway 3

message: I suggest the dates of major upgrades be listed.  I came here trying to learn when the major widening of this highway in the 21st century below Dickinson was done. Certain existing landmarks were destroyed in this construction and I wanted to know when that happened.foobar (talk) 14:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of Major Upgrades
Talk:Historic Crew Stadium

message: What is the source of the claim that Crew Stadium is expanding to 30,000 seats?  I didn't see anything on the stadium web site about it.   Jwolfe 23:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed until someone adds a source --Yukata Ninja 17:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the auditor, the Ohio Expo Center owns Mapfre Stadium rather than Mr. Precourt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stinerman (talk • contribs) 13:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 

message: why was this page renamed Historic Crew Stadium ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.87.217 (talk) 21:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  why
Talk:Texas State Highway 6

message: Texas SH 6 between Navasota & College Station is becoming a freeway.
98.194.130.215 (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: On FM 1179 westbound (E Villa Maria) approaching business loop 6 R, there is a sign for business loop 6 J.  You can see it in Google street view.  The signs at the intersection show 6 R as expected.  When I saw it, I figured somebody in the highway department who didn't know any better just grabbed the first business loop 6 sign at hand, not realizing that the letter codes were on them.  Then I came back here and found that there is no business loop 6 J (geographically, best guess for eventual location would be ca. Valley Mills, Clifton, or Iredell).  --Mr Wednesday (talk) 02:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting business loop oddity in Bryan
Talk:Chihiro (Spirited Away)

message: This page need not exist. Finite 23:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if someone can expand it, there's no reason to delete it. Beau99 7:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, what would you suggest doing? Documenting her personal growth or something?Finite 21:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:Yesterday

message: Add issues below as you see fit, sign with ~~~~
Would this be better accomplished with , as  is with ? -- Alfakim --  talk  16:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since 'calcsubtract' has logic to cover a wider variety of conditions I think 'yesterday' is actually slightly more efficient as is, but see m:ParserFunctions. When implemented that should vastly simplify all 'date math' type processes (among other things). I think we should plan to revise these at that time and not worry too much about precise methodology at present. --CBDunkerson 17:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be implemented already --SgeoTC 21:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as of two days ago. --CBDunkerson 21:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

message: 
Please added , whoch will include  . Thanks. -- Suntag ☼ 12:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --CBD 17:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Could someone please, add a feature for this template to support DMY dates just like template TODAY does? It doesn't make any sense to have Today template work in DMY and Yesterday template work in MDY. SkywalkerPL (talk) 11:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMY 

message: I think maybe DMY should be the default setting, and the template should be customizable with the MDY format. ToThAc (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: MOS:DATEVAR - I'm not going to restart the arguments about date formats, which were resolved years ago, on your behalf. Do you have a specific need for a DMY usage, or is this just a whim? Cabayi (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's perhaps if the template is used where DMY is preferred over MDY. ToThAc (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

text: as this is not a ready-to-go edit.  From the section above this one, support for an alternate style parameter alone doesn't seem contentious - code it up and test it, then it can go live; else establish consensus for new styling first. — xaosflux Talk 19:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 24 October 2017