lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seizure response dog

message: Updated article and all references according to new literature, adjusted tasks of seizure dogs to references (before list did not match any cited reference). Jophiel 123 (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article 

message: I heard that seizure dogs, can tell someone is about to have a seizure from smelling a chemical change in their body. I'm not sure if this is true, but I've heard dogs can do it because they have such a sensitive sense of smell. Violet yoshi (talk) 00:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe anyone's exactly figured out what makes some dogs capable of predicting seizures. Remember that each case is different, so it's possible that some dogs may be tipped off by scent, while others may notice changes in behavior or other cues. Sarrandúin [ Talk + Contribs ] 19:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can dogs tell when someone is about to have a seizure from smell? 

message: Added some new images, one of which would go well for this article:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Service_Dog_at_restaurant.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Assistance_dog_out_shopping.jpg
Would it be okay to use one here?  — Preceding Zipster969 (talk) 21:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Added links that are relevant to the context within the existing text. Should we remove the notification to add more? Zipster969 (talk) 19:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Enough Internal Links?

message: I'm proposing that Seizure_response_dog is merged into Medical_response_dog . I'm proposing this as a seizure response dog usually comes under the medical response dog term and the page should not be separate due to its size.Suisaber (talk) 02:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This has gone nowhere in almost 2 months; I am removing the merger request templates. William Harris (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Template talk:Cathead English people by place/Archive 1

message: The effect of some recent edits was to make :Category:People from Preston a sub cat of :Category:People from Preston. Was this really intended? MRSC • Talk 22:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is there now district and borough? What is the difference? MRSC • Talk 07:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is a district. Why did you revert it. The problem is you do not understand the organisatin of local government in this country. I suggest you leave it well alone.--84.9.192.124 11:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All boroughs are districts in England. Your change makes no sense. MRSC • Talk 16:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

text: and would you care to explain this edit summary: rvv. No they are not. See reality stop messing up the hierachy and messing with things you have no knwoledge off. If the borough var is not set it has no effect no leave it alone as you are messing up  ? MRSC • Talk 19:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: :It obviosly doesn't work as it places all the settlements in Merseyside as well as the broughs. It confuses Bouroughs with their name sakes. It makes a mocary of the word hierachy by placing everything evrywhere. As for the diagram above it is not very good as an explanation.--84.9.210.94 16:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK then so why is :Category:Metropolitan Borough of Knowsley not containing :Category:People from the Metropolitan borough of Knowsley now then?  And you still haven't explained why boroughs are somehow different to districts only in Merseyside.  I note that you have still reverted before discussion again. Regan123 17:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've lost track with what is going on with these categories at the moment and its delayed any further work on them as I will not roll-out a template that is not stable. I have thoroughly explained every step of the way what I am doing and encouraged discussion in a variety of places. Can we have some polite and coherent explanation of exactly why Merseyside has to be treated differently to every other county in England, so we can move on?  MRSC • Talk 08:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merseyside

message: Contributors may be interested in the above, in relation to this template, which came up after I have begun updating the Staffordshire entries.  Regan123 21:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion there seems to be suggesting that people should be categorised by contemporary local government district only, not by settlement. I have grave concerns with this approach. MRSC • Talk 20:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thankfully there was no consensus to delete. MRSC • Talk 14:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, though I bet someone comes back.  No consensus generally bringts another XfD at some point. Regan123 23:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 December 10#Category:People from Stoke-on-Trent by settlement|Category for Deletion on People from Stoke on Trent by settlement ]]
Talk:Leash

message: thumb
What about domesticated cat leashes? I guess, they're rare... --Scriberius (talk) 15:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cats
Talk:People's Congress of Kurdistan

message: == Merge ==
Should this be merged with Kurdistan Workers Party? Kongra-Gel redirects to the latter... Q·L·1968 ☿ 15:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Should this be merged with Kurdistan Workers Party? Kongra-Gel redirects to the latter... Q·L·1968 ☿ 15:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:SLOMR

message: Thanks for cleanup & everything, Dahn !
--Vintila Barbu 15:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't mention it. Dahn 16:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Transom knot

message: In the picture is a constrictor, not a strangler. Here (www.ehow.com/video_4468146_tie-transom-knot.html) is another example.
And here http://www.realknots.com/knots/constric.htm are both of them.
Nodurosul (talk) 13:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's right.  There was an edit a couple months ago that changed it from the constrictor.  I've fixed it -- thanks for pointing out the problem...  --Dfred (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: As pointed out in recent edits, there is some confusion when dicussing the transom.  Unfortunately I fell prey to this in my earlier statements.  Sorry about that.  I have identified some additional references that may help and will attempting to further clarify the article.  --Dfred (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I was wrong, topologically is as strangler as it can be, even if the "riding part" is constrictor-like. I guess admiting it after more than four years is better that not admiting it at all :) Nodurosul (talk) 10:46, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Constrictor vs. strangler
Talk:Gruffudd ap Llywelyn ap Iorwerth

message: How's that pronounced, anyone proficient in Welsh, please. Rursus 15:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation??

message: The Welsh Enclyopedia entry is "Gruffudd ap Llywelyn ap Iorwerth and as we have recently changed his son Llywelyn I propose we change the name through out and rename the article? -----Snowded TALK 08:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Talk:WirelessHD

message: Reason for my suggestion of merging WirelessHD and WiHD: They seem to be the same thing. Peter S. 15:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The use of acronyms in this article is either incorrect or unclear. Could someone confirm or fix the following:
"The WirelessHD (WiHDTMTM) standard" - TM?
"WDHI uses 40 MHz of bandwidth" - Wireless High-Definition Interface?
Thanks Otus (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronyms 

message: Confused: Is WiDi (introduced as a proprietary Intel technology) actually the same thing as what's mentioned in this page? The strangeness is that the string "WiDi" isn't in fact mentioned anywhere on this page. --ButterSoda (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: WiDi uses 802.11n 2.4Ghz, so at least at phisical medium level it's a different thing. Probably the redirect should be removed!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.224.66.227 (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

text: There were a lot of incorrect redirects for WiDi and Wi-Di, including to Miracast somehow. "WiDi" correctly refers to Intel Wireless Display (WiDi). As such, it now redirects there. To deal with confusion over the name, I've created WiDi (disambiguation), which includes WirelessHD. The other wireless display technology articles need work. I'm doing the best I can while I research the topic as part of my profession, but I can't dedicate much time to editting Wikipedia articles, unfortunately. I'm glad to have finally tidied this up! :) Nitwon (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Intel announced that newer versions of their WiDi-Driver for PCs would be Miracast-compatible. So I would call WiDi a precessor of Miracast (Miracast is standardized since autum 2012 by the WIFI-Alliance, Intel is a member there). And Micacast currently uses the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands. --MichaelK-osm (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WiDi Redirects here? 

message: Not really - check out http://www.whdi.org/WHDISIG/FAQ.htm and the question: "How does the Video Modem Work?". It clearly states that the transmission can contain errors, only that they're not visually significant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.119.42 (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHDI uses lossless video encoding?
Talk:Hard money lender

message: It would seem appropriate to add links to pages listing hard money lenders, just as many articles discussing businesses, organizations or other types of institutions will link to relevant references. Several lists of lenders can be found online at http://dmoz.org/Business/Real_Estate/Commercial/Lenders/ and http://blog.c-loans.com/public/blog/78861. --Randfish 19:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I am looking to make an investment on a property with a va loan, I would need a 15,000, what collateral wold you accept?  Elvisp4474 (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loan
Talk:Bridge Learning Campus

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! Removed a blatantly POV paragraph near the end as well.    JubalHarshaw 16:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: I propose a split into two articles Bridge Learning Campus - Secondary and Bridge Learning Campus - Primary. Mark999 (talk) 20:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Primary schools are generally considered non-notable on Wikipedia. Do the spilt and the primary article will get deleted or merged back into the secondary article by other editors, so best to leave it as one article.--Bob Re-born (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:TheBus (Prince George's County)

message: Can I put a list of bus routes on this page, or should it go on a separate article? --Woogers 21:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'm not that fond of a list of bus routes in Wikipedia in the first place.  To me, it seems more appropriate for users to be directed to the transit agency's Web site for route information.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bus Routes List
Talk:December 21 2012

message: Although I'm dubious about the value of this page, I disagree with its nomination for speedy deletion, as it is evidently not patent nonsense in the Wikipedia sense. AlexTiefling 16:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, it is not. However, since the information already appears in Maya calendar, this article was changed to a redirect page (the information should appear in one place). Accurizer 16:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

text: * My impression was that this page was intended to use the material from Maya calendar as context for a list of cultural references to the date itself. (The game Rifts comes to mind, for some reason.) AlexTiefling 16:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * Perhaps it's Torg, rather than Rifts that I mean. AlexTiefling 15:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The significance of this date in the Mayan calendar is verifiable and notable, so the redirect seems appropriate. However, as a separate article, it may not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Speculation about what this date may mean in other contexts would probably be considered original research, which is not allowed. Also, the article probably would not comply with this policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Before developing an article you should consider whether it would comply with these policies. Accurizer 16:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I will review all these things before creating an article. I don't know whether it would be original research - there's a good deal of writings out there on what this date will hold for the future . . . we shall see . . . takethemud 02:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Brady Hoke

message: I think as America enters a period of questioning the brutality of football, that a controversies page or section be created for coaches that have a record of sending players with potential neurological issues back onto the field. As the interest in CTE grows, and tracking players and coaches with potential links to victims of CTE, a controversy page be added. 
In this case, I think we need to add a section for Brady Hoke on the reported allegations that he sent Shane Morris back into play in 2014 shortly before his termination at Michigan.
Here we have a New York Times article reporting on this 
and here is the video replay from the game 
Also, for full transparency, I was shocked at the Bills game and of course last nights Miami's game with Tua's injury. AFairChild110 (talk) 12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We might arguably be able to justify including a one-sentence reference to the Morris incident, but I would strongly oppose hinting at any sort of connection between that incident and Hoke's firing. He was fired for losing games, plain and simple. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies section?
Talk:Mr. Bones (video game)

message: "One of Saturn's Best Games" is subjective. I'm not sure what to replace it with, and I'm unfamiliar with this game at the moment.-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.107.165.193 (talk) 16:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm proposing that Mr. Bones (album) be merged here, as I don't see any reason it should be a separate article and why it cannot be included in this article about the game. –MuZemike 16:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and merged the soundtrack article to a separate section here. –MuZemike 05:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry that I didn't chime in on this subject in a timely manner, but for what it's worth, I approve of the merger.  The album is mostly a soundtrack for the game, and not particularly notable of itself.--Martin IIIa (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:St. Paul Episcopal Cathedral (Cincinnati)

message: The image is not of the Cathedral. The Cathedral was on the other side of Plum Street Temple. This is an image of the First Congregational Church, later used as the Temple Court Building, and then demolished. The image should be updated...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.137.215.242 (talk) 22:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

message: I've fixed the spelling and some links for this article, but have to confess a certain nervousness about the veracity of the content; I haven't been able to find any reference to this cathedral elsewhere on the web (and it isn't even mentioned in the context of the history of the current Episcopal cathedral in Cincinnati, Christ Church Cathedral).  What diocese was it the cathedral church of, for example?  Views please. Carbonix 16:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify

message: So who has a reference on when it was demolished?  1932, as stated in the infobox, or 1937 as stated in the article?  72.106.159.201 (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demolition date?
Talk:Jimmie R. Yee

message: is he oriental
:Yes, he is. Please see the sources added. Morenooso 07:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  o 
Talk:Asteroid hyalosis

message: The dog photo appears to show a lens opacity (cataract) rather than vitreous pathology (asteroid hyalosis).
:The dog in the photo has both nuclear sclerosis and asteroid hyalosis.  I know it's a lousy photo, but it's all I could get with my limited photographic abilities.  If you think it's not a good representation of the condition, we can definitely remove it.  --Joelmills 04:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I put up what I hope is a better image.  One of these days I'll get the focus right.  --Joelmills 05:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Third attempt is up.  Any thoughts? -Joelmills 03:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

text: That's a good idea.  I don't suppose there is a eye cross section diagram already in existence (and with a free license) with which we can work? -Joelmills 15:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo is wrong?

message: The term asteroid body links here...I think there needs to be a disambiguation page for it or something.  Asteroid bodies are also structures found in certain cells in conditions like sarcoidosis.  They may be the same crystals found in this condition, but they certainly aren't found only there.  I have no idea how to edit something like that though, I'm just an occasional wikipedia user...75.65.156.70 (talk) 03:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Asteroid body
Talk:Canine coronavirus

message: Information contained in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canine_coronavirus#Canine_respiratory_coronavirus belongs in the article https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Betacoronavirus_1. This article is specifically about Alphacoronavirus. The term canine coronavirus does not refer to all species of coronavirus that infect dogs, but specifically the Alphacoronavirus species. I propose this section be moved and include a link directing those looking for canine respiratory coronavirus. If there are no objections, I will move this section.
MarialeegRVT (talk) 02:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Last month (December 2020) I attended a 2-day NASEM OneHealth workshop with veterinary researchers and veterinarians, in which (among other topics) the issue of companion animal vulnerabilities (they were being studied as possible sentinels for human disease risks) was addressed.  The statement made was, despite the (possible) role of animal reservoirs in the rise and spread of SARS CoV-2, the current belief among relevant working scientists is that humans are not at risk of animals spreading coronavirus (we can't get it from them, we think), but there is some evidence that humans MIGHT spread some variant(s) of SARS CoV-2 to companion animals (but evidence is very slight). So, IMO that topic needs further exploration, and equipoise may still (properly) apply, although there may not yet be enough scientific and sponsor interest in prioritizing this research topic. MaynardClark (talk) 03:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section move proposal
Talk:Grand Prairie Armed Forces Reserve Complex

message: Believe this is an incorrect change/name change with this latest edit.  The Grand Prairie Armed Forces Reserve Complex is only an entity housed at Dallas Naval Air Station and Hensley Field.  Here is a link to the Grand Prairie Armed Forces Reserve Complex facility: http://www.bop.gov/about/other/gra.jsp 
Will wait for your response as to why this change was made and/or further information. We live in the community and don't believe this is an accurate name change. Thank you. WCGasette (talk) 18:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Around 8 years ago, AirNav indicated that the field had reopened as a private airport.  As I recall it was called something like "Dallas Millennium Airport", and that "Millennium" was incorrectly spelled. Presumably the airport closed before long, and now there's no record of it on AirNav. Currently AirNav gives this location as "Redmond Taylor Army Heliport" (TX18) . -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just found a little more information: "As of 2002, although still publicly owned, the former NAS Dallas airfield was operated by a private company as 'Millennium Dallas Airport'.… At some point between 2002-03, the attempt to reuse the former NAS Dallas as a business aviation airfield ('Millenium Dallas Airport') apparently failed, as the airfield was closed once again, and depicted on the 2003 Sectional Chart as an abandoned airfield.". The airport code was 7TX2, but this is currently for an airport near Austin . -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The reason the field failed as a commercial venture was becuase the City of Dallas could not afford the environmental clean-up, and returned the field to the U.S. Government. 76.186.118.246 (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is the name correct (implying it is a joint installation)?  The 254th Combat Communications Group web page  indicates it is stationed at "Hensley Field Air Guard Station".  --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Can anyone confirm through sources meeting WP:RS whether any part of this facility is still being used for the operation of aircraft? I'm wondering if it's still appropriate to describe it as an airfield. The runways have been closed for years, but I'm fairly certain that a seldom-used but technically active helipad remained (remains?) on the site. Carguychris (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to the FAA's recent decision to make VFR sectional charts available online, I have verified that the Redmond Taylor Army Heliport is still operational—now to find some citable sources and add an actual discussion to the page. Carguychris (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Aviation use in 2020
Talk:Canid alphaherpesvirus 1

message: Seems to be a name for a symptom for this specific disease -- not sure if it should be merged, not an expert Sadads (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Dog pox]] into [[Canid alphaherpesvirus 1]]
Talk:Canine influenza

message: One offline source says Canine Influenza may be endemic in three regions. If true, the opening paragraph still seems to overstate this. I see than the endemic nature of this disease was in contention last year... what new source has solved this dispute? - JeffJonez (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Endemic?

message: — Assignment last updated by Mbl5581 (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Plagues and People

message: Paragraphs and sources were added as part of a course assignment Nby2216 (talk) 17:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Paragraphs
Category talk:Bishops of the Methodist Episcopal Church

message: The category text should explain why this is a subcat of the UM Bishops category - namely that the Methodist Church USA along with X, Y, Z, formed the UM church in 1968 (if I have understood this correctly). I also think you should not omit the USA from the Methodist Church USA as there are other Methodist churches. roundhouse 14:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the changes, using text from one of the other articles. roundhouse 14:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UM Bishops
Talk:Anthony Durand

message: A photo of his pottery showing the distinctive style would help this article.  Also, this article really needs references showing that he is well-known for his distinctive pottery, otherwise it could be deleted. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 17:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled