lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Snowkiting

message: Currently, the wiki Kiteboarding page describes Kiteboarding as a land-based sport alternatively named Kite Landboarding. ("Kite Landboarding" is set up as a wiki referral link to the current wiki "Kiteboarding" page).  Actually, AFAICT, the sport generally referred to in the real world as "Kiteboarding" is a water-based sport which has Kitesurfing an alternative name, and which has land-based and snow-based offshoots.  A number of websites, publications, and organizations exist which support this interpretation of what Kiteboarding is and is not (see http://www.kiteboardingmag.com/index.jsp, http://www.ikointl.com/index1.php, http://www.ikiteboarding.com/, http://www.ikiteboarding.com/kiteboarding/articles/what-is-kiteboarding.aspx, etc.)
Besides water-based and land-based versions of Kiteboarding, a snow-based version exists which is referred to as "Kite Snowboarding" or, as "Snow Kiteboarding", or as "Snowkiting".  A wiki Snowkiting page currently exists.
It appears to me that page-naming on this within wiki is out of sync with nomenclature usage in the real world.  Barring strong opposition, I intend sometime in the near future to do the following in an attempt to correct this situation:
* Move the current wiki "Kiteboarding" page to "Kite Landboarding".
* Make a referral link from "Landboarding" to "Kite Landboarding"
* Make a referral link from "Kiteskating" to "Kite Landboarding"
* Make a referral link from "Kiteboarding" to "Kitesurfing"
* Make a referral link from "Kite Snowboarding" to "Snowkiting"
* Make a referral link from "Snow Kiteboarding" to "Snowkiting"
* Do some minor edits on the "Kitesurfing", "Kite Landboarding", and "Snowkiting" pages to provide cross-referrals where needed.
Coomments?  Outraged objections? Alternative suggestions?  In hopes of having a single-pronged discussion on this, I ask that the discussion take place on the current Talk:Kiteboarding page.
Posted on the Talk:Kiteboarding, Talk:Kitesurfing, and Talk:Snowkiting pages -- Boracay Bill 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization of wiki pages on [[Kitesurfing]], [[Kiteboarding]], Landboarding, Kiteskating, [[Snowkiting]], etc. 

message: The merge should take place. Kite boarding Snowkiting, and Kite skiing all cover the same ground. If someone interested in this area could take care of this it would be great. Thank you. SchreiberBike (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:U-shaped valley

message: Merged into 'Valley', see Talk:Valley. The way, the truth, and the light 00:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

message: This paragraph is discussion added by an editor, possibly OR and not encyclopedic format, a YouTube video is the source given:
:There are problems with the example illustrated by this page and simplifications implied. Isterdalen (illustrated) is an example of a glacial trough which exhibits a large step (downwards) in its long profile, but, as can be seen in one of the pictures, it is a U-shaped valley up-stream of this point as well. A better example is the Loch Avon basin of the Cairngorms in Scotland which starts at a trough-end, and the land up-stream shows little or no modification by glacial processes. Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: 
The simplification implied, that glacial troughs generally start at trough-ends, is not borne out in mountain ranges (such as Norway and Scotland) where many glacial troughs are through-valleys, where the glacial trough draining away from the water-shed is connected to the glacial trough draining in the opposite direction, with little or no high ground separating them. 
These two problems merit a re-wording of this entry, choosing a different exemplar and referring also to through-valleys as found in Norway and Scotland.
— Erik Jr. 20:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is not appropriate is it? But the point raised by the editor (apparently in error in the article not here) looks a valid one. User:Curamach care to expand your point, or better, just boldly make the changes? DanHobley (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent OR re Through end
Template talk:BLP/Archive 1

message: Since WP:BLP isn't policy, and inasmuch as the use of policy here generally may confuse editors who mistake the term to refer to WP:POLICY, ought we perhaps to remove the policies and locution? Joe 05:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy

message: What is this about? I'm tempted to nominate it for deletion. It seems to be an excuse to add an extra template onto a talk page. Pointless. --Lord Deskana I VALUE YOUR OPINIONS 11:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in order to encourage editors on bio pages to read BLP and to show subjects of articles where to go if there's a problem. SlimVirgin (talk) 06:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the point of the template, but I definitely think the wording should be changed to "guideline", as that's what BLP is.--MikeJ9919 19:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it needs to go back to the original, because BLP refers to policies as well as guidelines, and it's those policies the page tries to draw people's attention to. As Radiokirk, who changed it, hasn't responded to my query, I'm going to restore the original version. SlimVirgin (talk) 20:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree...the original looks fine to me.--MikeJ9919 22:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll change it back. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this about?

message: Radiokirk, I couldn't see the benefit of the changes you made recently. Can you explain? Also, BLP isn't policy yet, so we shouldn't use that word. SlimVirgin (talk) 06:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit

message: Hi Kotepho, I've reverted back to the original format as I think it looks better. Was there a specific reason you preferred the other format and color? SlimVirgin (talk) 12:44, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:Kavad I

message: According to my researchs, Kavad I is the same Kay Qobad  and Kawus is the same Kay Kāvus son of Kavad. I'm sorry for those of who know NOTHING about history and are rvt or deleting my IMPORTNAT edits. Perse9s (talk) 05:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? What researchs? We use reliable sources here, not our personal opinions. Read the name section of Kavad, theyre not the same person. Also, you’re not allowed to create another account when you have been blocked. HistoryofIran (talk)
I suggest smart contributors to compare the history of Kayanians and Sasanians since the reign of Jamasp to understand the similarities between these two dynasties. Perse9s (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kavad I is same Kay Qobad in Shahnameh
Talk:Sādhaka

message: In clarification, sadhana is the discipline or practice, sadhaka is the practitioner or the one engaged in discipline.  Does tantra and tantrika and yoga and yogi establish a precedent?  I hold that there will eventually be enough sourced and referenced content for independent encyclopædic entries.
Walking my talk in Beauty
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 05:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: I think they should be separate if there really was enough material to warrant two separate articles. But this one clearly hasn't evolved into much yet. How about we merge and have a subsection for Sadhaka on Sadhana, and if it grows much at all then split it out again.-Owlmonkey (talk) 18:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of sadhana and sadhaka
Talk:Poppy King

message: Jewish???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.48.25 (talk) 07:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish???
Talk:Gil Kenan

message: Does anyone have a reliable source for this? Mad Jack 05:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish?
Talk:Kakori conspiracy

message: The original article title Kakori train action appears to have been created specifically for Wikipedia.  A Google search for "kakori train action" -wikipedia turned up one hit, a Wikipedia mirror, apparently.  Because of that and the title's inherant POV, I have moved this page to Kakori train robbery.  This new title is in line with the English naming convention for train robberies and shows many Google hits from non-Nationalistic sources. --Adamrush 14:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: See Talk:K. B. Hedgewar#Keshab_Chakravarthy_and_K._B._Hedgewar. utcursch | talk 05:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keshab Chakravarthy and K. B. Hedgewar 

message: Describing the robbers without qualification as "freedom fighters" for an action in which they killed an innocent bystander is more than a little biased. Rebels, perhaps? Militants?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.169.64 (talk) 06:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable language
Talk:Jamiel Chagra

message: What are we looking at in the lower section of the portrait of him? I can't make it out clearly, but someone might doing us a favour if they found a more appropriate picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TTID (talk • contribs) 18:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Photograph

message: I added to this article facts that I heard directly from Jimmy Chagra.  Is there no room for those facts?  Must those facts be published elsewhere first before they can be listed here even with notation as to their nature? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Politicalmerc (talk • contribs) .</small>
*Please bear in mind Mr. Chagra has lead a different life than most. Although, I( have no proof, exageration is certainly possible. Please be more specific as to the circumstances under which you were told these "fact". Somnabot 08:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This was in an old version of the article.
“Chagra faced a possible life sentence without parole if convicted and a law clerk of Wood's told Joe Chagra, Jamiel's brother and attorney, that Judge Wood intended to give Chagra life without parole.”
Would be an interesting contributor to the murder motive if true, but I couldn't find a reliable source absolutely anywhere referring to this ever happening so had to take it out. If it's in an FBI document or something else relating to the case somewhere I'd like to see it. Chillabit (talk) 10:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Law clerk
Talk:Vellore Mutiny

message: I have no opinion but the article should decide whether to spell the ex-king's name "Tipu" or "Tippu".
IAmNitpicking (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tipu/Tippu 

message: This article has just been re-rated from High-Class to Low-Class, on the grounds that it is "Not a general area of knowledge". While the Vellore rising was a much more localized and short-lived outbreak than the Great Rebellion of 1857, the numbers involved and the political implications do make it a significantly important event in Indian history. As such it is covered or referred to in nearly all modern histories of British rule in India. I suggest that a Mid-Class classification would be the most appropriate one. Any comments?Buistr (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I set it to what it was until it got "re-rated" in March to a rating that clearly does not agree with the assessment scale. No opinion on whether mid or low is more appropriate. Huon (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rating

message: Vellore revolt 2401:4900:4A93:3218:CBF:1224:213D:A76 (talk) 15:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social
Talk:Yoctangee Park

message: This article is very disorganized and I'd appreciate help fixing it up and adding information. ~Kruck 06:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disorganization

message: Shelters were donated by the Bolmer Family, Rotary and Lions clubs of Chillicothe
(note to self) ~Kruck 06:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shelters
Talk:Blackwater River (West Virginia)

message: This acronym is used only on this web site.  A Google search of the term "NFBR" shows no other use of this acronym to represent the Blackwater River (West Virginia).  A review of literature of WV state parks, forests, and national forests reveals no use of this acronym.  The use of this acronym in the article deters from effective reading of the article and is original research made up just for this article. WVhybrid (talk) 02:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Unless the acronym is widely known or used (such as MNF for Monongahela National Forest), it should not be used.  Even if it is a widely known acronym, it needs to be clearly introduced and identified.  The practice of simply conjuring up abbreviations needs to stop. Brian Powell (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of acronym "NFBR" for North Fork of the Blackwater River 

message: I wanted to know more about the smaller, more successful of the 2 projects that is being used to rehabilitate the river, for several reasons. It is always heartening to learn of simple, cost-effective processes that work well, especially when government contracts and tax dollars could be at stake. I also wanted to know if the waters are safe for swimming, since the only mention of possible recreational use is the class of white water rapids. But the link to footnote no. 17 is broken. I have not read any other river articles, but shouldn't rehabilitation and recreational use be separate headings?  Beadmatrix (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References, Rehabilitation and Recreational Use 
Talk:Trespass to chattels

message: From the text:
:Some actions constitute trespass and conversion; in these cases, a plaintiff must choose which claim to make based on what amount of damages they seek to recover.
Surely this isn't true: under federal and most state procedure, a plaintiff can plead multiple causes of action in the alternative.  Why wouldn't this be the case with trespass and conversion?  NTK (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pleading

message: I will be updating this page today as a part of the Cyberlaw WikiProject. Jamxtoast (talk) 18:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Mindrot

message: Mindrot does meet the criteria for having an entry on Wikipedia. With multiple members from the band being in various other notable bands and having released 3 albums on an independant but notable lable.
--Ambiguousfrerak 06:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs to be tightened. Statements like "managed to make a lasting mark", "Others believe that they were a band ahead of their time", and "demo made its way through the record industry causing a lot of interest" need to be deleted or sourced. The claims to notability especially, such as playing with those other bands and releasing an album in conjuction with Apocalypse, need to be sourced. See Wikipedia:Citing sources. —Centrx→talk • 07:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Josh Rouse

message: Surely Josh deserves a better description than the very one All Music guide uses. Stick Fig 06:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the plagiarized material has been removed or thoroughly edited to remove any copyright violations. - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 22:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Mount Maunganui College

message: The article seems to have a lot of empty sections as well as information not suitable for Wikipedia, in particular "Dux by Year", "Heady Boy and Head Girl" [sic], and the empty sections "Sporting Achievements" and "Cultural Achievements", though a case might be made to take a second look "Principles" [sic]. It will be removed though you can look in the page history to see what was there. Mr Bluefin 06:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless sections 

message: They do Useful1 (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The amisistrater keep blocking my acount and destroying my factualy correct information
Talk:Conservatoire de Paris

message: Émile Louis Fortuné Pessard was a pupil and professor at the Conservatory. I was going to add, but the order list seems confusing. meatclerk 06:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pupils

message: In accordance with WP conventions, i have removed the two long lists of former students and teachers to separate articles, giving direct links from the page.
The article needs at least two major sections, one on its history, another on its curriculum and current activities. I have made a start on the former and will be exapnding it from time to time when I have the opportunity. --Smerus 12:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving the article

message: I find this source confusing. The Académie Royale de Musique was and remains the Paris Opera. I'm not sure why the source seems to say the École Royale de Musique of 1784 was annexed to it. As far I've seen the École Royale de Musique remained a separate institution until it was merged with the Institut National de Musique and became the Conservatoire. I don't know of any other source that makes this strange statement. Robert.Allen (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's amazing how many mistakes we find nowadays (1839), even among well-known authors. Please, forgive me, Krenakarore TK 13:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between the Académie Royale de Musique and the Conservatoire 
Talk:Ed (film)

message: This film was not a "critical and commercial success" and the new york times did not describe it as "laugh-tastic"
the film has a score of 2.2 on the IMDB.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.216.120 (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joke Article 

message: "An anonymous consensus has concluded that the "film" is the worst artistic accomplishment of modernity."
This doesn't even have a link to a Geocities website with this claim, I'm removing it. 24.60.201.10 (talk) 20:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst Artistic Accomplishment 

message: , can you review these diffs?
*template added
*safesubst
I can delete the TfD stuff, but I'm not sure if you're saying that the post-safesubst code is acceptable or can be avoided? Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I said  One puts safesubst in the template to be substed like this, not in an article, or otherwise there's no difference from the usual subst. I didn't make changes to the live template, and, as I said, you don't have to save your edit to see the effect, let alone in the main namespace. See what I added at the TfD. Nardog (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it! I see that you mean "Show changes" and not "Show preview". Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subst?
Talk:Seoul Metropolitan Subway rolling stock

message: Hi! I am very interested in this article and believe that this is very informative especially for foreigner and railway fan like me to have a list and gallery of  a certain line around the world. But I noticed that the gallery list is not complete and its hard for people like me to see what they really are as the internet would be limited in providing us with the images because I assume that they are mostly in Korean. So in line with this may I please request a decent photo of the following trains not only for me but for the sake of everyone:
Seoul Subway Line 1
*Korail Class 311000 (4th batch) in current livery
*Korail Class 311000 (5th batch) in current livery
Seoul Subway Line 4
*Korail Class 341000 (2nd batch) in current livery
*Korail Class 341000 (3rd batch) in current livery
These are just some of what I noticed and hope this becomes a start or catalyst to improve further and add more images to the article.
Cheers and Thank You! 감사합니다 PhilippineRevolution (talk) 02:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for more images for other batches 
Talk:Ernest Thesiger

message: 'He enlisted in the armed forces at the outbreak of the World War I in 1914, allegedly hoping to be assigned to a Scottish regiment because he wanted to wear a kilt, but was wounded in the field and sent home.' 
Slightly non-sequitur. What regiment was he in, and which battle was he wounded at? Unless he actually served in a Highland unit, the kilt business seems not very encyclopedic. Valetude (talk) 14:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  War service 

message: A new book (see citation 3 ISBN 9781473687912) has 3 pages on Thesiger's role in needlework, starting in his war service and after assisting disabled soldiers with this, and involved in women's suffrage movement,later Vice Patron of the Embroiderers Guild.  Are there any other sources for the Disabled Soldiers' Embroidery Industry? Is it Edbury Street or Ebury Street?
Kaybeesquared (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needlework, war wounded and suffragettes 

message: It names his grandfather, uncle and cousin, but not his parents. Who were they? Valetude (talk) 08:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parents?
Talk:Bulletproof (1996 film)

message: Actors should be matched to their characters. --Supernumerary 03:34, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast
Talk:Forest Park, Portland, Oregon

message: Just a heads up--this looks dreadful in iE (too much white space, didn't check ff). Gallery and/or commons link instead? Katr67 (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. I just removed a bunch of text content, contributing to the current imbalance between text and photos. -Pete (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting
Talk:Jainism in the United States

message: I propose a merge with Jainism in the West, which details Jainism outside of India as a whole. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ  Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 04:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Jainism in India

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 15:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: About Jainism 2405:204:52A6:E2E5:F0BD:EDD:D9E4:38F0 (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social
Talk:Jainism in Delhi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:Jainism in Bundelkhand

message: I think the page should have history of Jainism and that portion is missing. RS6784 (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History part is missing
Talk:Jainism in Rajasthan

message: *Barmer has a very good Jain Population and therefore i have added that. Please take care --59.95.209.235 (talk) 06:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barmer Added 
Talk:Hard Eight (film)

message: Basic information to add to this article:  what the title refers to. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 05:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT? DonIago (talk) 02:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article