lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diddle

message: The article mentions twenty-fourth notes in the example 
For example, in a sixteenth note passage any diddles in that passage would by definition also be sixteenth notes. In a twenty-fourth note passage, any diddles in that passage would also be twenty-fourth notes.
I've never heard of a twenty-fourth note (dotted sixteenth note maybe?) , and I can't find any info about a twenty-fourth note from google, etc, so I have changed it to thirty-second note. If I am wrong and there is a twenty-fourth note, please enlighten me. --64.230.94.162 17:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

message: There needs to be a disambiguation page here.  This reason is because diddle can also mean female masturbation.151.204.223.249 21:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: I've started a proposed rewrite at /proposed rewrite. Please make any comments there. --Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 18:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rewrite 

message: There's a discussion open about moving a full rewrite of Rudiment, combining all smaller rudiments, into mainspace and redirecting all the smaller article to rudiment going on now at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Percussion#Rudiment_rewrite --Evan ¤ Seeds 04:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rudiment rewrite
Talk:Maslow-Toffler School of Futuristic Education

message: *Who was Maslow?  Why was the school named after him/her?
*Who was Toffler?  Why was the school named after him/her?
*Where was it housed?  A new building?
*Why was it founded?
*Why was it closed?
**Lentower 11:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs?

message: Can someone please explain how this article is notable? -- Lucas20 (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The school was notable in the unique education program it offered for its time, and also for the content of
some of the courses offered.
There was class in futuristics (futures studies).  Abraham Maslow and Alvin Toffler inspired
the design of the educational program.
The educational program was design to offer students more choices in the educational program, as well as practical 
training (internships) at local institutions and businesses.
(I was a student at a high school in Ohio, that offered a "futures studies" course, where we learned various forecasting
and analysis techniques such as the Delphi method,  Cross impact matrices, etc.  
Pretty interesting stuff for a 9th grader.
I can't speak for M-T school alumni, but what was valuable about our program was the idea that the future isn't fixed, 
our actions in the present will have long-term consequences.  Any well-designed futures program should prepare its graduates
for a more rapidly changing future, and give them the tools for anticipating change and consequences.
Wikip rhyre (talk) 18:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Travelodge

message: I recommend that the UK Travelodges have a separate article of their own.
Mark: I would concur.
How do they have 4x as many locations as employees?  One of these numbers is surely incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18F:801:DCC6:4503:575D:8EEE:87A (talk) 03:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Michael Ford

message: This talk page should not redirect to Talk:Michael Gerald Ford, it should be separate, unless there is a good reason for redirection. --83.131.17.100 10:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it doesn't redirect, but this version did. --89.172.253.132 17:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try and avoid that mistake next time.  It looks like it is all fixed now. Jjmillerhistorian 12:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

text: He wrote more than just two books as it can be seen here, and there is an article on Wikipedia about Liber HVHI, one of his books, so he is notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. And he is also musician. --83.131.17.100 09:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The "lulu" reference you give was written by his publisher to promote him and his books.  The Liber HVHI article was mostly written by you.  Pgc512 13:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I see from his Myspace page that he is/was a musician and has written 2 books.  But other than that I don't see much that is notable.  Being a "follower" of a religion is not notable enough for an article in Wikipedia.  Otherwise there would be 6 billion pages just for all the people.  You should give some references here for people to discuss.    Pgc512 02:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He wrote more than just two books as it can be seen here, and there is an article on Wikipedia about Liber HVHI, one of his books, so he is notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. And he is also musician. --83.131.17.100 09:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The "lulu" reference you give was written by his publisher to promote him and his books.  The Liber HVHI article was mostly written by you.  Pgc512 13:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is 'Michael W. Ford' notable?

message: He may not be very good as a journalist, but he is probably better known to more people in the Bristol metropolitan area than some of these other Mike Fords are known throughout the world. Just a thought.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.130.96 (talk) 13:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Should we be thinking about a page for the Bristolian idiot amateur journalist known as Mike Ford
Talk:The Twilight of Atheism

message: O for heaven's sake - the guy's one of the world's leading theologians, written over 100 books, Prof at Oxford, this has been reviewed in many papers etc... NBeale 17:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I have deleted a new paragraph on "Subsequent developments". Nothing whatever to do with McGrath or this book! Snalwibma 07:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Beyond Belief

message: To 132.239.90.218 and Blanchardb: to avoid a nasty edit war, could we decide on this here? Mouse is back 22:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire Reviews section should be rewritten and shortened. The text as it appears now belongs on the back cover of the book, not in an encyclopedia article about it. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 22:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur; however, what about the NR quote? Mouse is back 00:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Review quote 

message: According to McGrath, Twilight grew out of a speech he gave at a 2002 debate.  However, I have tried and failed to find any report or even advertisement of the event, despite checking widely.  It's not on the Oxford Union termcard for the period, or in the Oxford Gazette, or (using Internet archive) on any of the websites of the participants.  Nor was it reported in any newspapers, the secular humanist press, or anywhere else I could think of.    
Does anyone have any independent clarification of what the debate was about, who took part, and when, and under what auspices?
Ta  --Dannyno (talk) 22:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How about now?  Anyone?  --Dannyno (talk) 10:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What does it matter? I remember drawing a horse once because I saw a horse and wanted to portray it on paper. Is it really that important? And for your information, not all of his debates have een at Oxford. If I remember correctly, he toured the US that year. I might be mistaken though. 64.234.0.101 (talk) 03:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not claiming it's especially "important". I'm asking whether anyone has the information. I don't care where else he might have spoken in 2002, I just want to know if the 2002 debate was reported anywhere, and if so where. --Dannyno (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2002 Debate

message: A reception section should summarise reviews, not quote them verbatim. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 06:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception section 

message: This article currently consists of:
#A rather uninformative quote from the author.
#The book's table of contents.
#A WP:QUOTEFARM of reviews.
This is not an encyclopaedic article. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 02:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: When this article, under the section on "Reception", quotes what the National Review says about the book, it says "I find him a shade too irenic". Should this be "ironic"? Vorbee (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ironic or irenic
Talk:Grove Park railway station

message: The Bromley North line is not cut off as indicated as there is still the connection is still there from platform 1 that joins the fast platform 2 track but is rarely used.
Once upon a time there was a throwover connection from platform 3 where direct trains from the London termini could cross onto the branch usually whilst a "popper" was in at platform 1, however with increased timetabling on the fast up which carried the coastal expresses, these conflicted with the Bromley North through trains thus stopping an express in Elmstead Woods station or tunnel exit signal did not go down too well with passengers or drivers who would be booked for late running and so the platform 3 crossover was routed out.
Direct trains through the platform one connection did persist but again, crossing a train from the fast down over to the fast up, running a section against the flow then in to platform 1 was again a timetabling gauntlet when it became super expedient to just reduce the service down to the 2 car units and no more through trains.
There is a quite potent campaign to reinstate the direct to London services, the BR days saw the rush hour trains leave Grove Park and fast to London Bridge and invariably they had 2EPB's with first class compartments/toilets in the 10 car trains.
92.25.10.247 (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  The cut off you appear to be referring to refers to the layout of platform 1 as a structure, which is itself separated - it is not referring to the track layout. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut off not correct
Talk:Novastar

message: Anybody think there should be a disambiguation for people who are trying to find information about the mortgage-lending company of this name? --Christofurio 17:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I have added a toplink. --Paul Erik 20:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. --Christofurio 04:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Is it Joost Zwegers or Joost Zweegers? I've seen both. --Paul Erik 17:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead singer's name
Talk:Cameron Mitchell (restaurateur)

message: This article needs serious expansion, specifically a history section.  Here is a link to some history:  This is on the Cameron Mitchell website, so it is very POV, but there is some good info here if one is willing to put in a little time to extract it.  PLEASE, do not just copy and paste it, as it not only has major POV issues, but that is plagiarism.  I may do it in time if no one has done it, but I don't have the time right now.  Polypmaster 02:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Local linearity

message: It should be considered to merge this page with tangent line since local linearity is precisely the idea being captured by a tangent line.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.31.62.207 (talk) 16:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not. Lorem Ip (talk) 18:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I made some edits, mostly to remove the claim that a locally linear function is smooth-- that is absolutely wrong.  I think that the article should either provide a precise definition of local linearity (saying a function has a tangent line is not good enough for me-- does that just mean it's differentiable?  that there exists a linear approximation of the function good to second order?), or we should treat local linearity as a non-rigorous idea that gives some intuition of what differentiability means.  (I prefer the second option.)  I also wonder if points with vertical tangents should be considered locally linear; it seems cleaner to disallow that to me.  (In particular, the current list of failures of local linearity excludes those points.)  How do we handle \sqrt[3]{x}?,   | \sqrt[3]{x} |?  Low-level explanations should remain, since this term seems to show up primarily in freshman calculus texts, but the article could still use some work, in my opinion.140.114.81.55 (talk) 03:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick Edits to Correct Inaccuracies

message: If this phrase shows up in freshman calculus texts, no wonder students are often confused. The "best option" seems to be to explain that it's bad terminology: how can a function be "locally linear" (at the origin, say) without being linear everywhere? 
The "exceptions" merely confuse the issue — it's something of an understatement to claim a nowhere-differentiable continuous function isn't "locally linear" because it has "cusps"!
Moreover, the graph of x \mapsto \sqrt[3]{x} — assuming we take the real cube root — is continuously differentiable — C^\omega, even — everywhere. Proof: the map
    c(t) = \binom{t^3}{t}
embeds the real line as its graph in \mathbb{R}^2; the coordinates are polynomials and thus trivially analytic. The map isn't differentiable at the origin because "infinity" isn't a linear map.
My vote would be to redirect to "tangent," since editorial policy most likely precludes "calling a spade a spade," and discontinuous derivatives are more a matter of definition than geometry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.184.118.88 (talk) 13:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems hard to "correct" without editorializing
Talk:Castlefield

message: I am penning some addition material for this article- but being held up by problems with commonist- I had hesitated as the material is sizeable and may be better spun of as separate articles. However, I have decided to write it offline, then lump it all together and upload. I will not throw a tantrum if it is later split. Watch this space.--ClemRutter (talk) 14:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding 

message: I’m working on the Bridges WikiProject and was excited to find your admirable and clear article on Castlefield with particular reference to the four viaducts.
I see that your plans for work on this article may have been interrupted, so here are one or two minor technical points which you may find useful in due course.
By the way, I am investigating ‘lattice girder/truss bridges’, hence my interest in the main spans of these viaducts.
The metal spans of Cornbrook and GN are essentially the same from an engineering design viewpoint.  The only particular point of difference is that the earlier Cornbrook has denser latticework – 7 intersections per diagonal as against only 5 on the later GN (This is assuming that I have got them the right way round – you will know immediately if I haven’t!).  The description truss girder is fine.  However, these 2 viaducts are superb examples of this form of lattice work which was in vogue from about 1850 to 1900, and at 1894 the GN structure may be one of the last to be built.  The description “lattice girder bridges/viaducts” would do full justice to these fantastic examples of Victorian engineering.
You describe the GN bridge as “tubular steel” with a link to Fairbairn.  I don’t think this is the best description: the span as mentioned is pretty much similar to Cornbrook, and not the sort of plated iron/steel box such as the Menai Bridge to which the Fairbairn article relates; nor does it use modern tubular steel for the individual structural members.  May be you were influenced by the cylindrical columns used as piers?  
Hope you find this interesting.  I won’t mess the article myself as it’s far too good.
Flying Stag (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The four bridges/viaducts
Talk:Chorlton-on-Medlock

message: FreeBMD has a registration district named Chorlton (to 1924), is the registration district either Chorlton-cum-Hardy, or Chorlton-on-Medlock (noting they are only a couple of miles apart)? Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by DynamoDegsy (talk • contribs) 11:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: FreeBMD has a registration district named Chorlton
Talk:Clayton, Manchester

message: Clayton is in the City of Manchester. If it was somewhere in Bury, Stockport or Trafford, it may be necessary to make clear where it is but Manchester is pretty well known. Haldraper (talk) 12:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This move is clearly controversial, so start an RM discussion and raise your points there. Until then, leave the article where it was. – PeeJay 19:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, don't bother with the RM. The first disambiguator for UK geographical locations is their ceremonial county, and even then it is done by comma. This page is in the right place. – PeeJay 21:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester 

message: :Clayton, Manchester → ? – There should be a space after, rather than before the comma, i.e. "Clayton, Manchester". Haldraper (talk) 08:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is an uncontroversial request, so it does not require full discussion. The talk pages are also messed up. I placed an appropriate  and removed the RM template, an admin will soon sort things out. No such user (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2016
Talk:Gorton

message: There's an alternative, possibly better (and free-to-use) image of the monastery here, should the need arise. --Jza84 |  Talk   12:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More nice images here. --Jza84 |  Talk   01:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:The Italian Socialists

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support, as explained above --Checco 12:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support, as explained above --Checco 12:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: #Weak Oppose: there seem to be limited sources that this obscure party ever existed, so its name in English is uncertain. But it is at least as likely that anyone searching for The Socialists is in fact looking for Socialism. Absent proof that The is invariably used for these people in English, Wikipedia convention would be to call this article Socialists (Italy); but it might be just as well to have that redirect to Italian Socialist Party. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move

message: :Add any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
The party changed name into The Italian Socialists, thus the discussion above has no importance now. --Checco 16:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Ileostomy

message: I believe that the link to MeetAnOstoMate.com should be re-inserted. This is a website for ostomates from around the world. It is intended to help ostomates find friends and/or start relationships. I think the link would be an appropriate addition to the topic of this article and useful for the readers.
----
I understand the desire to offer a resource helpful to people with ostomies, but Wikipedia's guildlines don't allow such entries. Here are four Wikipedia unexceptable external link guidlines that might apply:
 
*Links mainly intended to promote a website.
*Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, use the "ISBN" linking format, giving readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources. 
* Links to sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content. 
* Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace), discussion forums or USENET.
DCwom 14:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: .

message: I keep on finding crohns 4 young adults link being removed. This is an information and support site for people with ileostomys. This site is the same sort of site as Shazs site. Why is it being removed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.74.214.33 (talk) 10:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it because it seems to be fairly obvious blog/personal website WP:LINKSPAM. You're probably right in that that other site should not be included, I'll look at it a bit more in a minute. Thanks for pointing that one out. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 20:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ..

message: The description here has conflicting parts.  The BCIR / J-Pouch is first described as attaching to the anus (seems like the usual description), and then shortly afterwards, as being drained by catheter through a stoma (which describes the Kock pouch).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.130.24.169 (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other options 

message: This article contains 47 sentences followed by double spaces, with other senteces throughout the article being followed by a single space. I've read on Sentence spacing in language and style guides that single spaces are recommended in the digital age. Couldn't find anything in WP:MANUAL, but maybe I've missed it. Anyway, I think consistency is importent. Thoughts? --Candide124 (talk) 21:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence spacing inconsistency
Talk:Sophie Buxhoeveden

message: I have been bothered for some time by the negative, nasty accusations made by Anna Anderson supporters against this woman. I do feel I have now fully discounted them and hope the issue is ended. May she now rest in peace.Aggiebean (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Character assassination of Sophie

message: "Sophie Freiin[1] von Buxhoeveden (German: София Карловна Буксгевден, tr. Sofiya Karlovna Buksgevden;" It is not German, but Russian; I can't see how to fix it.--Manfariel (talk) 03:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong language
Talk:Leatherheads

message: There is no proof of Johnny "Blood" McNally relating to Leatherheads.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.203.136.247 (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based on McNally 

message: In the info box it says the budget was 77 million, yet in the "Box Office Performance" section of the page it says it was 58 million. This should be remedied. Ashleydenee (talk) 02:26, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 
Talk:Pat Wall

message: Votemoose 12:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

message: This is a seriously unbalanced article. The content is hagiographic and the style clumsy ("Pat's concern for the importance of theoretical understanding informed his interest in this journal of the history of the revolutionary movement"). Omitting mention of entryism is inexcusable. 62.31.46.253 17:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest that the article needs firstly rewording as some parts aren't really in a good historical order, but also referecing of some of these quotes as a basis for further development. Votemoose 00:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After trying to search for more material for this entry, i came across an article which the original entry was a direct copy of, i've added the link to the bottom of the page (it's the obituary by Ian Hunter). I'm going to try an reference all the relevant parts to this. Votemoose 12:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alfred Goodwin

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Alfred Theodore Goodwin was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage