lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:T formation

message: Since some people suggest that the single wing is older than the T, I will note that the T features prominently in Fielding Yost's
1905 primer, Football for Player and Spectator, and that the book is old enough to be available as a free ebook. Since the forward
pass and the seven man line were legalized in 1906, the formation predates the legal forward pass. If my memory serves, the
single wing and double wing do not. Dwmyers (talk) 12:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of the T 

message: The previous version of this article claimed the University of Minnesota used the T-formation in the 1930s and 1940s under Coach Bernie Bierman.  Under Bierman, the Gophers ran a single-wing offense.  See "Bernie Bierman," College Football Hall of Fame
https://footballfoundation.org/hof_search.aspx?hof=1532
Jim Campbell, "Single Wing Power," College Football Historical Society Newsletter, (Feb. 1998), vol.XI, no.II, p. 7.
http://www.la84foundation.org/SportsLibrary/CFHSN/CFHSNv11/CFHSNv11n2e.pdf
Bierman never adopted the T-formation and even apparently referred to it as a "flash in the pan."  See Lewiston Evening Journal, Dec. 10, 1943, p.13.  http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1913&dat=19431210&id=qvYpAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JmcFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1519,4408803
The success of the 1940 Stanford team under Coach Clark Shaughnessey did a lot to make the T-formation popular.  See Ron Fimrite, "A Melding Of Men All Suited To A T," Sports Illustrated, Sep. 5, 1977. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1092785/index.htm
Notre Dame coach Frank Leahy adopted it a few seasons later.  
See Ron Fimrite, "A Melding Of Men All Suited To A T," Sports Illustrated, Sep. 5, 1977. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1092785/index.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minngator (talk • contribs) 18:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minnesota and the T 

message: This formation is used for a vast amount of trick plays including reverses,runningback passes, and hundreds of play fakes.I've faced it once in my time playing tackle football and it was a tricky offence to figure out. any body else faced it? I'd like to know your experince.66.57.12.120 (talk) 22:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will note that the diagrams of the T formation in Dana Bible's Book Championship Football show a tight offensive line, ends split 1-2 yards from the tackles, halfbacks 4 yards behind the linemen, and a fullback 4.5 yards behind the linemen. Dwmyers (talk) 12:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 

message: I went ahead and corrected this in the article. What distinguishes the Split-T is not the split end, which may be used with any formation, but the spread between the offensive linemen. 65.79.173.135 (talk) 17:25, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding of Split-T
Talk:Joan Brady (American-British writer)

message: Joan's dispute with a local council obviously happened.  But I am wary of the use of the charged word "corruption" without more detail.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference provided said nothing like what was claimed in the article and looks very much like actionable libel. Wikipedia guidelines require a double reference from reliable sources in the case of controversial claims. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 00:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corruption
Talk:Tornado drill

message: I removed this section:
"A tornado drill could consist of:
*Plan of escape 
*Types of dwelling affected 
*Monitor weather conditions - watches and warnings"
This seems to contradict the previous part that describes general tornado drill procedures. While the types of dwelling affected relate to specific tornado drill procedures, you wouldn't say the drill itself "consists" of this. The "plan of escape" part is covered in the earlier part, and the wording is a little misleading - you escape the building during a fire drill, not a tornado drill. As for monitoring the weather conditions, if it's a drill, there's not going to be any weather to monitor. Kansan (talk) 18:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explaining my removal 

message: I'd love to get more specific on the states that have statewide tornado drills, but obviously we need reliable sources for such a list, like how fire drills are sourced.  Who can help compile a list with me?  I know Virginia does one (and need a source for that), but otherwise...?  SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of states that have statewide tornado drills?
Talk:Research Unix

message: I deleted the PDP-9 from the list of systems. It wasn't one of the main development platforms. According to this note from Dennis Ritchie, it was only run on a PDP-9 for a few hours to play around. Since it says the PDP-9 belonged to a "different group", I assume this means it was in another part of Bell Labs other Dept 1127, and thus not strictly part of the Research UNIX project. Agarvin 21:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PDP-9? 

message: I assume the code was copyrighted by AT&T, but on what terms was it published to other users?  In particular, how did the code legally become part of BSD, which has a free/open source license? -- Beland (talk) 03:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Berkeley Software Distribution covers that. All full BSD distributions required an AT&T source license. Only 4.4BSD-lite and lite2 were open sourced (although that term didn't yet exist), but in those versions all AT&T code was replaced. Except for a few bits, that is, which lead to the USL v. BSDi lawsuit. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution terms 

message: IMHO, V5 Unix does not have sufficient notability to warrant its own article. The material in Version 5 Unix is already covered by Research Unix. (For this very reason, I merged my own former articles about V9 and V10 into Research Unix.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I agree with V8, but before we go into big merge mode, note that actually V6 was the basis for the first commercial versions (and of the Lions book). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Version 5 Unix]] 

message: Given the complicated nature of how these different Unix versions/forks developed from the original AT&T Unix versions, maybe we should include a section here explaining how Research Unix fits in with and compares to the other version of Unix like BSD,System III and V, and  proprietary UNIX's like HP-UX, IBM AIX, and SunOS/Solaris. If I understand the timeline correctly, BSD was based on early version of Research Unix while later version of Research Unix were influenced by BSD. System III & V were commercial releases of Unix AT&T sold once they where allowed to sell software commercially after settling the anti-trust case against them in the early 80's (which had begun in the 1970's). What could use some explaining in this article is how BSD version in the early 80's (prior the BSD Lite versions) were similar and different from Research Unix versions released in the 1980's (Other then the only partially released last two versions of Research Unix). Also, how did System III & V differ  from Research Unix and did proprietary Unix's like HP-UX, IBM AIX, and SunOS/Solaris incorporate any Research Unix features in the 8th Edition or later? --2600:1700:56A0:4680:0:0:0:44 (talk) 22:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between Research Unix, BSD, System III & V, and proprietary UNIX's like HP-UX, IBM AIX, and SunOS/Solaris.
Talk:Interlocutory appeal

message: Perry Mason often mentions "interlocutory agreements" in his books which are rulings which are binding, but yet not final.  Merging this temporary concept into the "interlocutory appeals" definition would blur these two issues, should not be done, and would be "incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial." 69.170.80.52 21:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prologue

message: I redirected interlocutory proceedings and interim proceedings here, but these topics are actually wider than just the appeal. So this should be seen as an (alas) ... interim measure. – Kaihsu (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  interim redirects
Talk:114th Fighter Wing

message: The 114th Fighter Wing History Section/Reference to Website Data:
South Dakota's Most Accurate Historical Information and Archives.
Website/Blog ["ThuneWatch.com"/Attorney Todd Epp] under
This day in S.D. History / March 15 / Air National Guard Redesignated 114th Fighter Wing / Comment Section (1).
South Dakota Air National Guard "60th Anniversary" Article.
--67.150.4.120 11:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Dakota Air National Guard 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 17:13, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Double fisherman's knot

message: Should this be moved to Double fisherman's bend? — Omegatron (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: Reference [1] on the page is a dead link. As linked, it goes to a 404 page on the source domain. Search for the 
title of the reference ("Knot Break Strength vs Rope Break Strength") on the internet finds a slightly more 
informative page on the same domain: https://caves.org/section/vertical/nh/50/knotrope.html, which says 
"This article has been removed pending further review by the Vertical Section Board.". 
If the source domain does not feel the article is reliable, then it is not reliable enough for Wikipedia. I think it should be removed.
--
I agree. I find the information from this link to be unreliable. In the Security section this sentence appears: " The butterfly bend held under slightly more weight, but was "almost impossible to untie after a significant load of about 1,000 lb [4.4 kN] was applied".[1]"
The butterfly bend is non-jamming, so how can it become "almost impossible to untie"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.194.218.6 (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Reference
Talk:Contiki Tours

message: but see the entry at Wikipedia:New Zealand Collaboration of the Fortnight#Contiki Tours for even more info. Moriori 02:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It's a copyvio anyway

message: I've removed the section on Contiki being the source of "tiki tour". Orsman's '98 dictionary suggests that the phrase comes from a company of the same name, as opposed to a contraction of "contiki tour". He also notes that the use of the term "tiki" in brandnames was not uncommon in the past (e.g., Tiki-tape). The contiki link makes a good story, but at the moment it seems a little too close to original research, I think. --Limegreen 11:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "tiki tour"

message: Is the name taken from Kon-Tiki?--ZayZayEM 08:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most probably. Although as far as I'm aware that is knowledge privy to the founder. As to whether "contiki" on its own has entered the language, it follows a fairly strong linguistic tradition of words being contracted (and turned into nouns where appropriate, although not here obviously). My connection keeps timing out, so I'm struggling on the evidence front just now.--Limegreen 08:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: John Anderson's autobiography gives the etymology of Contiki as follows (1) first van was named "Tiki", (2) tours were then sold under the name "Tiki Tours" (3) NZ Tourist Board challenged the use of the name and so they added "Con" at the front because the tours were taking place on the Continent.  I'm new to this, not sure how to put references in because it is in a book - I can't find an online copy.Matrixmania (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Shepreth

message: Who is Oliver Flint??? Has anyone every heard of the band he's in? --GRM 21:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:The Trickster of Seville and the Stone Guest

message: *Tisbea is not only a peasant girl, but also a fisher woman, as described in the Spanish text of the play. 
*Also, when inspecting the External Links section, the Spanish full text second link does not work. Also the English text link is broken. Finally, in-depth summary and analysis link does not work/is not found. Steparaptor (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor changes/suggestions

message: Can anybody provide sources for saying that the real name is Tellez Gabriel? My sources say that the name is unknown. If nobody can provide sources for the assertion, the sencence may be removed. Anna Lincoln 14:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Diez Comedias del Siglo de Oro, second edition edited by Jose Martel and Hymen Alpern, Revised by Leonard Mades, Copyright 1939,1968, reissued 1985,Long Grove, IL. page 235 . the order is reversed.. should be Gabriel TellezDie4Dixie 04:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cambridge Guide to Theatre gives his real name as Gabriel Téllez. Banham (1998, 1112). DionysosProteus (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the real name 

message: There is another theological angle to the play, which would be significant to the original Spanish-Catholic audience.  When warned of damnation, Don Juan repeatedly asserts that he can "repent at leisure".   Tirso de Molina, a monk, attacks this attitude and thus shows how a weak point in Catholic theology, taken literally, can lead to horrifying behavior.  When Moliere adapted this play, he turned Don Juan into an outright atheist who did not fear divine punishment at all.  These points may be missed by a modern secular audience. CharlesTheBold (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Theological Implications 

message: I read that the anti-hero is based on Juan de Tassis, 2nd Count of Villamediana, who was renowned as a notorious womaniser, probably to disguise his homosexuality.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 07:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Juan de Tassis, 2nd Count of Villamediana

message: It is not clear that the play was written by Tirso de Molina. Cátedra (a prestigious publishing house) says it is "attributed to", for instance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.138.249.94 (talk) 15:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship
Talk:Osborne bull

message: I don't think this should be catalogued as «drinking stub» right now is a part of the spanish symbols and culture.
:Done. Mountolive 05:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: Perhaps the Lois' bull is as popular as the Osborne's on red-&-yellos flags. It's a sort of rampant bull derived from that of the Lois jeans' trade mark (sorry, Maurice, my harrowing English remain as broken as usual)(" National Air Force"??? I caught you!). I'm not acquainted with the new brand "Spaniard pride" symbols, but perhaps  this bull badge should be taken into account ( & the Basque sheep,& the Catalan cat & donkey for Basque & Catalan Nationalism).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 09:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Catalonia 13 Osborne's bull??? It's not possible!--90.163.200.23 (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the Lois' Bull? 

message: There reads: The Barcelona bull was vandalized by people who identified themselves as Catalan independentists. Later it was restored by a group of neighbours of Masquefa.
If there is a bull in Barcelona (which is in Catalonia), why does the table still show "0" for Catalonia? 109.240.126.236 (talk) 23:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barcelona Bull?
Talk:Kursenieki

message: See also Talk:Courlandians. Olessi 22:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Their origins might be in Courland... but with that "optimisation" we could merge Latin Americans and Spanish, eh? 92.18.234.127 (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So there are only 9 people left on this planet that claim Kursenieki heritage? That is amazing if true. Those 9 people need to find each other and start making babies... fast! --Tocino 07:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let me get this straight 
Talk:Bison, South Dakota

message: Would like to know ecologists of the area 2604:2D80:5686:3C00:4185:E178:6ED4:E6FA (talk) 02:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moreau river ice fishermen and women
Talk:Religion in Malta

message: In line with WP: SPLIT, I suggest that a separate article "History of Religion in Malta" be created out of section 1 of this article. This would leave this article as a contemporary snapshot of the current state of affaris.
Demdem (talk) 17:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion of split

message: Why is nothing said about Pentecostals and Charismatics in Malta?
--VictorPorton (talk) 22:19, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentecostals and Charismatics in Malta?
Template talk:Seattle neighborhoods

message: Use the noinclude option to the template if you don't want your page being added to :Category:Seattle neighborhoods.  For example, the article Seattle, Washington has this template tag:
:
-- Brianhe 22:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored this functionality, which was lost when the template was converted to a navbox. I'm not totally sure that it's good and proper to use <includeonly> for automatic categorization, but this is a pretty good way of doing it.  --Mikaka (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Timothy Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones

message: Doesn't appear to be neutral, left it in place but put NPOV tag  Christopher Pritchard (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the section in question has been long since removed, and no activity on the talk page in a long time, I will remove the NPOV tag now.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Economy Bill section
Talk:Translational symmetry

message: I think the current first phrase,
 In geometry, a translation "slides" an objects by a vector a: Ta(p) = p + a.
is not very intelligent.— MFH:Talk 22:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Beast of traal 21:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this was merged with symmetry then it would be necessary to consider merging all other specific types of symmetry too. e.g. time translation symmetry, rotational symmetry, reflection symmetry etc. I don't think it would be a good idea Weburbia (talk) 09:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be merged with [[Symmetry]]?
Talk:Lead, South Dakota

message: Lead is not in the Wikipedia list of incorporated SD towns, but is in SD cities (24th by population).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.243.145 (talk) 01:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Lead is a city. They are officially the City of Lead. Their website has "City" all over it: http://www.cityoflead.com/ TCN7JM 01:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead, city or town? 
Talk:Tomocomo

message: "as Powhatan requested him to accompany her in order to count the number of people in England" to me does not imply that he went against will in that he was kidnapped by the English. 129.67.118.176 (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also surprised that you keep changing it to kidnapping - I recall you being quite insistent on WP:STATUSQUO a while ago. 129.67.118.176 (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kidnapped?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guitarists/Outreach

message: I created a nifty little template that you can just place on a new member's Talk page to welcome them. Have fun! --Aguerriero (talk) 22:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 2006 

message: I have heard "the call" from the last newsletter. Need to get off my duff and do a new one. A few new members in the ranks. And a suggestion that the dormant Classical Guitarist Project be folded up into the ranks of the Guitarist Project as a task force. Time will tell. New newsletter is on the ever growing to-do list. Anger22  (Talk 2 22) 02:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's been too long. Spike we need you
Talk:City of Queanbeyan

message: "A more recent Council has had these names withdrawn."  Should this be:
"A more recent Council meeting has had these names withdrawn."
Roaming27 22:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence structure?

message: Is this article even needed seeing as there is another article on Queanbeyan which is also much more complete?  I'd like to merge some of the info from this article to the other Queanbeyan article and then eliminate this one. Anyone opposed?--Antonioism 08:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Articles 
Talk:Canada national rugby league team

message: Refer to talk on rugby league in Canada page. Mattlore 22:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I don't know how to edit this stuff, but the kit is wrong in the drawing.  The sleeves are not black.  Check article on new kit on the Canada RL website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.234.121.205 (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Kit

message: Is there citation that supports the RL becomes Canadian football sentence? This isn't the sequence of events that I've read about in for example, Tony Collins' histories of the development of the various codes of football. Rtande (talk) 04:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Shyam

message: User:Shyam%20Bihari
Category:	273
Image:	4241
Mainspace	4192
Portal talk:	19
Portal:	774
Talk:	203
Template talk:	4
Template:	1014
User talk:	4658
User:	183
Wikipedia talk:	85
Wikipedia:	601
avg edits per article	1.35
earliest	09:26, 18 August 2005
number of unique articles	12048
total	16247
Shyam Bihari's editcount summary stats as of 21:42, November 3 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 22:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Monica Sex

message: I believe that the substub about one of the band's members is non-notable outside the band. The article itself is an unsourced BLP, making it potentially deletable anyway. —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merger of Seffy Efrati --joe deckertalk to me 20:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Support merger of Seffy Efrati. "Dubious notability" is precisely the phrase. Hear hear.  Evenlode222  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.10.129.92 (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: Merged. I would also suggest merging the article on Seffy Efrati who seems to have dubious notability outside the band. —Ynhockey (Talk) 07:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merger of Seffy Efrati --joe deckertalk to me 20:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Support merger of Seffy Efrati. "Dubious notability" is precisely the phrase. Hear hear.  Evenlode222  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.10.129.92 (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Seffy Efrati
Talk:Eureka, South Dakota

message: Eureka,SD is not exactly what I would call a "city". Town would be more appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.46.12 (talk) 07:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have recently added this article to WikiProject Cities based upon its inclusion in List of cities in South Dakota. Hopefully, one of my fellow WikiProject Cities participants can review this article and properly determine its status as a city.--TommyBoy (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  City 
Talk:Boyd Raeburn

message: He plays bass sax in the lead, but switches to tenor and baritone down below. Does anyone know the facts? Rothorpe (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Which saxophone(s)?
Talk:Faulkton, South Dakota

message: Webpage for Faulkton is at http://www.faulktoncity.org/
It is known as the Carousel City.  See C.W. Parker Carouselhttp://www.faulktoncity.org/carousel_1.htm Brenont 23:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)