Talk:Brady Campaign

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Brady Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111005120604/http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional to http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: <I>Critics said that so-called "plastic" handguns contain many metal components (such as the slide, barrel and ammunition), and can be detected by conventional screening technologies. Their response was to say the type of polymer used in the firearms is opaque to X-ray scanners, which would've hidden the metal components.</I>"Plastic Pistols"
Here's the closest text in the source and it ain't the same at all:p.425 
At the end of 1987 Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduced a bill banning pistols that contained less than 8.5 ounces of steel, ensuring no guns could pass through metal detectors.104 Major gun control groups like Josh Sugarmann and the National Coalition to Ban Handguns supported the bill, claiming that, while the Glock 17 was not invisible to metal detectors, “[t]he technology for developing a 100 percent plastic gun is around the corner.”105 Handgun Control Inc. echoed this position, saying, “everyone agrees the technology is here or around the corner and Congress has the unique opportunity to take preventative measures[, u]ntil we have the safeguards to detect non-metallic handguns, we have to ban them from the marketplace.”106 Not surprisingly, the ban on pistols containing less than 8.5 ounces of steel was strongly opposed by the NRA and other gun advocacy groups.107 
I don't see any criticism of the Brady Campaign. Unless someone can point it out I'm gonna delete this crap. Maybe replace it with their accurate prediction of 3D printed guns. Felsic2 (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critics said  

message: One critic says that the groups was pleased that the public confused semi-automatic rifles with machines guns as it made banning the former easier.
There ain't nothing in the NSSF press release about this group. I'm deleting the citation and naming the critic. Felsic2 (talk) 17:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: One critic says

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brady Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/gunsandmothers/debate2.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005120604/http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional to http://www.bradycenter.org/about/bio/additional
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/244
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.bradycampaign.org/?p=693
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: How many dues-paying members does the Brady Campaign actually have?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.80.149 (talk) 15:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership?