Talk:Cîroc

message: I removed this text from the article, but it may be something someone wants to follow up for the article: "Ciroc is distilled up to 96.5% abv before being watered down to 40% abv. This alone makes it a Vodka. It is commonly said that Ciroc is a white brandy or a Grappa/Marc, but this is impossible as Brandy or Grappa can't be distilled past 80% alcohol. Calling Ciroc a Grappa is almost the same thing as calling Finlandia a white single malt Whiskey." Notinasnaid 09:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anon comment 

message: The article states that Ciroc isn't legally considered vodka in the U.S., but I have a bottle right here, purchased in the United States, and it is clearly labeled as "vodka."  I don't know anything about what is considered vodka in this country, and how it should be labeled, but I am curious about the fact that it is labeled as such on the bottle.  Tenpercenter  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.99.82 (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vodka in the U.S.? 

message: "Ciroc is distilled up to 96.5% abv"?? This is not possible. 95.6% is the highest purity achievable by distillation. To get higher requires adding some benzene, which would make it unfit for human consumption.98.101.136.218 (talk) 04:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, as of today, the article was citing a dead link to support this statement, and the attempt to archive the link captured only an age verification pop-up message, so we cannot see what the source said. The azeotrope article says that fractional distillation of an ethanol–water mixture can reach 97.2% alcohol by volume, but only 95.63% alcohol by mass. Bottles are labeled based on alcohol by volume rather than alcohol by mass, so 96.5% might be technically possible. In any case, none of the detailed information that included that number is found on the current brand website. Even if what it said was true at one time, it is probably no longer true, so I removed the information that I was unable to verify, including that number. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Error 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cîroc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100919075550/http://ciroc.com/abouts/view/4 to http://ciroc.com/abouts/view/4
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100919075935/http://ciroc.com/abouts/view/5 to http://ciroc.com/abouts/view/5
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101120141338/http://cirocvodka.com/articles/view/22 to http://www.cirocvodka.com/articles/view/22
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Cîroc. There's the reasonable concern that the current title is overprecise and limits the scope. The shorter name is available and is unambiguous.  No such user (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Cîroc Vodka →  – concise, unambiguous. 162 etc. (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 September 2021