lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Penis fencing

message: Is this for real? --Christopher Kraus (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Raul654 (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pseudobiceros hancockanus? 76.79.237.162 (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Toxic semen being used to kill foes whilst fighting with penis sheath swords?! Now THAT sounds like reality TV I'd watch. By crikey. Edaemus (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real? 

message: Re: "Two hermaphroditic flatworms attempt to pierce the skin of one another with one of their penises. The 'winner' is the organism that inseminates the other; the winner becomes the father. The sperm is absorbed through pores in the skin", which is it? Is the skin pierced and the sperm delivered to the underlying tissue, or is the sperm delivered outside of the skin and absorbed? --Guy Macon (talk) 20:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Off the top of my head, confusing insemination mechanism of different species? It seems that many flatworms have genital pores, into which the penis ("copulatory bulb" in planarians) is inserted. Another problem with the statement is that this site states that in penis fencing species both individuals often succeed in piercing/inseminating the other, which would mean that both "win" and "lose" simultaneously. -- Donald Albury 15:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Could someone with some expertise please fix the article? I would do it, but you really don't want to see the results of an engineer writing about biology... :) --Guy Macon (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, my background is linguistics and computers. :) -- Donald Albury 19:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

text:  Is it just me, or is there some ridiculousness and/or bias inherent in the application of the concepts of "winning" and "losing" here?  Ha ha, you lost, you have to be the mother! 71.210.9.86 (talk) 07:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, penis fencing does appear to be a contest, with the goal of inseminating the opponent without being inseminated. In addition to the higher cost of producing fertilized eggs compared to producing sperm, the "loser" suffers damage to its skin. Talking about "winners" and "losers" is figurative speech that may be too informal. What do you suggest to replace that language? -- Donald Albury 10:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pierce or absorb? 
Talk:Azalina Othman Said

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mkativerata (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Promagistrate

message: Should we expand this article to include current Holy See usage of pro-secretaries, pro-prefects, pro-nuncios, etc? Gentgeen 05:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say no. Such a person is not a promagistrate, but rather a person who holds an office with the prefix "pro-" slapped to the front. Ifly6 (talk) 04:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article is mostly duplicatory and should be merged with . The title promagistrate is probably more common than the Latin term, which will probably lead to its retention here. I will probably start on the merge next week some time after completing some rewrites for Cato the Younger. Ifly6 (talk) 23:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Ifly6 (talk) 04:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[prorogatio]]
Talk:Mount Saint Joseph Academy (Flourtown, Pennsylvania)

message: This is a new location for an old article, Mount Saint Joseph Academy, which is now a disambiguation page.  The same information was copy and pasted from the old article.
Cmcnicoll 05:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Location
Talk:List of castles in Japan

message: This page is very useful, but it would be much improved putting the info in a table, then adding a column about the status of each castle as "original state"- such as Himeji Castle, "reconstructed"- like Osaka, or "ruins"- like Fukuoka castle. There are 47 castles in their original state, so this list should clearly show which they are. Some supplementary info might be useful too, such as construction dates or comments (like World Heritage status).
Cheers,
DrHacky (talk) 23:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle status 

message: Though it may be shocking to see Cinderella Castle added to this list of traditional Japanese castles, it is truly no less out of place in a list of Castles in Japan (NOT Japanese Castles) then the same castles listed for the USA.
Like it or not, Cinderella Castle has become a true icon of modern Japanese culture for the last 27 years.  Please do not remove this entry.
Best regards,
Tiktok4321 (talk) 16:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinderella Castle
Talk:Fukuyama Castle

message: The redirect Bingo Gokoku Shrine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 07:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bingo Gokoku Shrine]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lower Lonsdale

message: An IP insists on adding the following text to the page:
"==Crime and Social Disorder: Even with an influx of new residents over the past decade, the area is coping with some of the North Shore's highest levels of crime and social problems, such as homelessness and drug addiction. The issues reached a boiling point in the summer of 2007 when the residents of one apartment building held a "rent strike" to protest what they deemed as untolerable levels of drug dealing, prostitution and associated crime in and around their building."
*North Shore News, "Lower Lonsdale Challenges Simmer", Sept. 14
*North Shore Outlook, "Lower Lonsdale On The Brink"
Now, some of this is supported by the references, but it is completely out of context, and not reflective of the Lower Lonsdale area as a whole. In fact, to quote from one of the editorials used as a reference:
"when I read that some residents are concerned about drug dealers, prostitution, slum landlords, beggars and unruly youth in Lower Lonsdale I get a little upset. Some even go so far as to say Lower Lonsdale is as bad as the notorious drug and crime infested corner of Hastings and Main streets in Vancouver. Of course their complaints are exaggerated. Lower Lonsdale is not the inner city slum area of a major metropolis. One can still walk the streets at night and feel safe. The redevelopment of the area over the past two decades has removed the most notorious buildings. Gone are the "Big O" and Alice Hotel as well as the dilapidated and run down wartime housing that could be found in the area. These places have been replaced by high-priced condos, inhabited by well-heeled residents. So why are people like Lower Lonsdale activist Sue Cook using negative hyperbole over a few unresolved incidents of nefarious activities that occur in most towns and cities throughout the world? Quite simply it must be frustration."
The editorial clearly describes how the claims are exaggerated. Unfortuantely, the article text as presented does not present a balanced view of the issue; instead, it sounds more like an effort to draw attention to the problem. Moreover, it is just not relevant or notable to an international audience. Does that make it any less of an issue for the residents of the area? Certainly not, but we have to remember that Wikipedia isn't a community board, or a site for "calls to action" regarding neighbourhood issues. I've been accused of trying to "whitewash" the issue, which is rubbish - the article doesn't criticize the Lower Lonsdale area, but neither does it heap praise on it. Thoughts? --Ckatzchatspy 05:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV edits
Talk:Revolutionary Left (Spain)

message: Group recently merged with Revolutionary Socialism (Spain). Perhaps the articles could be merged Vahvistus (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we keep separate articles for historical, defunct organizations. --Soman (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Karratha Airport

message: I'm sure that this airport is much older than 1983. Prior to it being Karratha Airport it was known as Dampier Airport. I'm certain that regular services by MMA were taking place from the late 60s. The link referenced refers to the age of the current terminal building, not the airport itself.
--Rharris3 09:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I wonder what keeps this airport so busy, when there's only one airline flying to it, on two routes. Such a busy airport would surely be served by Virgin Blue, Skywest or even Airnorth? Having been to Broome, which is served by those three airlines in addition to Qantas and receives airline traffic contantly, I can't help but wondering why Karratha Airport would be busier. :) (Haven't been to Karratha though)
Is it because it's some kind of RFDS centre or does it get a lot of chartered mining flights?
Unsound (talk) 07:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busiest? 
Talk:Carles Rexach

message: Can somebody tell what is source for Copa del Ray and Champions Cup player stats? Thanks. --Clarus The Dogcow (talk) 09:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 
Talk:Salim Nasir

message: Salim Nasir.
Saleem Nasir was born Syed Sher Khan in Zila Mardan, Pakistan, in an enlightened family, on October 19, 1944. He took pride in being a Pushto – speaking Pathan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.227.185.71 (talk) 10:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Esteban (footballer)

message: It states his personal website
http://www.estebanportero.com/trayectoria.php  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trucoplus (talk • contribs) 12:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Height is 177 cm
Talk:Gerardo Seoane

message: If a Wikipedian has their own picture or a public domain picture of Gerardo Seoane, please add it. Djprasadian (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture needed
Talk:Israel Bascón

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 00:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Israel (footballer) →  – His WP:COMMONNAME is "Israel" or "Israel Bascón", sources on page that use his last name here: 1, 2, 3, and his Twitter and Instagram. He's not the only footballer to go by the name "Israel" (see Israel Jerez Martínez), so this is an incomplete disambiguation - as per WP:NATURAL I think using his paternal last name would make sense in this case. Ortizesp (talk) 13:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 May 2021
Talk:Javi Balboa

message: He only played twice for Real that season, so he wouldn't have won a medal... Salty1984 (talk) 17:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honours 
Talk:Kingscote Airport

message: Who or what is RPT?Browning ave (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: RPT stands for 'Regular Public Transport' meaning scheduled regular services ie airline or regular cargo run. MEBpilot (talk) 08:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi all - I am not a Wiki expert and not up with the rules, so please help me here! The Kingscote Airport is now called the Kangaroo Island Airport. How do we go about changing the name of the page? The Kangaroo Island airport was opened today by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and South Australian Premier Steven Marshall.
Thanks in anticipation for your help, Alice (Golden-elm (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change in name for this airport
Talk:Free Church Federation

message: This article is seriously out of date and needs updating.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.239.159.5 (talk) 15:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

message: The beginning of the article discusses the Free Church Federation as an association that was the result of a movement described as a unifying tendency displayed during the latter part of the 19th century but does not further elaborate.  The second part of the article discusses a movement, without giving it a name or description.  As a result, it is unclear what the main topic of the article might be. The 1908 Free church year book published by the "National Council of the Evangelical Free Churches" says on page 213: The Free Church Federation Movement is a gigantic network of organisation covering the whole country. so maybe the confusion is not just in the article, but in the sources themselves. The John Clifford article in the 1909 The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Thought volume 4, pages 377-378 parallels Wikipedia's current (23 July 2012) article, and may have been the basis for the 1911 Encyc. Brit. article that was originally imported here.  According to G. I. T. Machin in his 1998 Churches and Social Issues in Twentieth-Century Britain, page 201, the name for the "Free Church Federation" was the "National Federation of the Free Churches", but that name generates no other Google hits. The "Free Churches Group" has a legal entity incorporated as the "Free Church Federal Council" which seems to be the current incarnation. The "Free Church Federal Council" is an organization of free churches (i.e, those not part of the Church of England), including Methodist, Baptist, the United Reformed Church in England and Wales (a Presbyterian–Congregational merger), and some other churches of England and Wales. It was formed in 1940 by the union of the "National Council of the Evangelical Free Churches" (founded 1896) and the "Federal Council of the Evangelical Free Churches" (founded 1919) for the purpose of cooperating in matters of mutual concern. The council is presided over by a moderator who holds office for four years. (See Moderator) It works through local councils, which elect representatives to the Group Meeting. The directors of the "Free Church Federal Council" delegate the active work to the Group Meeting, within budgetry constraints. All the work is fulfilled in close partnership with Churches Together in England (CTE), with whom there is a joint operating agreement.(See Free Church Federal Council) CTE fulfills all employment functions for staff serving the Free Churches. Note that in the article International Federation of Free Evangelical Churches neither the UK nor England are mentioned. So are they not members?  Anyway, this article needs more research and a complete rewrite.  Any takers?  --Bejnar (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main topic: association or movement ?
Talk:Mayumi Shintani

message: I believe I found what i believe to be Mayumi Shitani's birthday and year of birth, it's actually right underneath her name.--AnimeDisneylover95 (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That should work. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayumi Shitani's birthday
Talk:Free church

message: I reworked the History section as it had significant errors and I don't want my students to tell me on papers that the free church arose in the Americas. Marpeck (talk) 16:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: A free church is one that did not charge pew rents, cf., http://anglicanhistory.org/usa/jhhbrown/free1857.html and http://anglicanhistory.org/misc/freechurch/ . The meaning of "free church" may have changed over the years. --71.17.132.157 (talk) 16:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong focus or disambiguation required 

message: The 'free' churches began to develop in the UK after the Act of Conformity had been passed in 1662. 
If this brief note were to be incorporated into the article that deals with non-conformism, it might be more useful (Pamour (talk) 08:47, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Free' Church and Non-Conformism
Talk:Manolo Gaspar

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Manolo Gasper.   signed, Iflaq (talk) 02:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Manuel Gaspar Haro →  – WP:COMMONNAME is just "Manolo Gaspar", doesn't use full legal name professionally. Sources on page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, all on page. Ortizesp (talk) 02:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 June 2021
Talk:Baptists Together

message: I think something needs to be said regarding the Baptist Union, C.H. Spurgeon and the Down-Grade controversy, or a page be made regarding the controversy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cloud Stryfe (talk • contribs) 14:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have added a short section on Michael Taylor with references, and this seems an appropriate place to make this addition. Usually 'downgrade' is unhyphenated. Cpsoper (talk) 21:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  14 years later, and I too was surprised to find so little mentioned about the Downgrade Controversy. It is nothing to be ashamed of. While the addition made in 2016 goes some way towards remedying the omission, I have taken the liberty of briefly mentioning it in the main History section where I think it belongs. Feel free to change as required.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.172.173.226 (talk) 12:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Down-Grade Controversy 
Talk:Pahiño

message: The notice at the top of this page refers to "living persons" and might not be the appropriate notice, as the subject of this article is deceased. It also appears that all of the information in the article (and more) is present in the death notice cited in the References section of the article, but that death notice is in Spanish and my Spanish is not good enough for me to be sure of that. Perhaps someone can advise me how to proceed or take over and do things on their own. Guyovski (talk) 23:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there has been no follow-up, I am removing the template because it refers to living persons and this guy is dead. If anyone wants to bother they can put in the right notice; I don't know what it is. Guyovski (talk) 06:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate notice and inline citations/references
Talk:General Baptists

message: This statement betrays some basic misunderstanding of both Calvinism and Arminianism:  "Today (2008), the majority of English and American Baptist churches hold a moderately Calvinistic outlook, combining the general atonement whosoever will view of the General Baptists, with the eternal security view of the Regular/Particular Baptists."
If a Baptist church believes that Jesus died for everyone, and if that same church rejects the notion that God predestines some people to believe, then that church is Arminian and can hardly be called Calvinistic. True, most Baptist churches believe in "eternal security," but this is not the determining factor of what makes them Arminian or Calvinistic. Arminius himself and the Arminian Remonstrants made explicit statements that the issue of eternal security remained unsettled for them. Indeed, a person can believe in eternal security and belong to the Society of Evangelical Arminians.
This being the case, General Baptist theology has overwhelmingly dominated Baptist churches both in the U.S. and the U.K. Most Baptists have a theology exactly as that outlined in the Society of Evangelical Arminians' Statement of Faith:  http://evangelicalarminians.org/sof
Forlinianslip (talk) 07:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Pichichi (footballer)

message: http://www.athletic-club.net/web/main.asp?a=1&b=1&c=1&d=1&jokalaria=334&idi=1
89 caps and 78 goals of Pichichi in official games with Athletic. Does mean this that he scored other 122 goals in 81 friendlies games ? 151.75.42.179 (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official goals and caps
Talk:AMT AutoMag V

message: I noticed that there's an unprofessional tone in part of the page. Notably, it says "The MK V used the same frame as the MK IV, and I have in my collection serial # 1736-3000(MK V serial) with a MK IV, .45WM slide." This is first-person perspective, and inappropriate as per WP:TONE. The entire paragraph, for that matter, could use cleanup or even a rewrite. 67.183.77.57 (talk) 09:11, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Person Perspective 
Talk:Sergi López (footballer)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Vaticidalprophet 02:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sergi López Segú →  – WP:COMMONNAME is just "Sergi López", doesn't use maternal surname professionally. Ortizesp (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 March 2021