lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Berlin

message: I think there is a small mistake in the May 1945 map, that of the white, pink and red zones. To my knowledge, the areas in red should be the territories won by the Allies between 16 April and 1 May 1945 and not disputed territories DevilandDaughter (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map May 1945 

message: Please remove "RAF" per WP:HATEXTRA. 49.150.4.134 (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 14:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2023 

message: Honestly, I think he should be included as a leader, but I want the input of other people first. WIKIPEDA (yes i meant to misspell it) (talk) 05:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. He was a the leader of the Third Reich and thus the head of the armed forces. Jmurphy042000 (talk) 00:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Hitler be included as a commander/leader? 

message: spell correction of defence plan to defense plan 2600:1700:E60:2310:55B7:F1E8:FF3C:B1F (talk) 06:00, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you not a native English user? Only in American English is defence spelled as "defense". See: the relevant Wiktionary entry. Dimadick (talk) 06:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Not done: please see MOS:ENGVAR. M.Bitton (talk) 16:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: shouldn't the proper language reflect the proper grammar? If the person is reading it in English, in America, shouldn't the article reflect that translation? As an American we can be thrown off by English spellings and vice versa,so shouldn't each page translation reflect the correct spelling? Even if that is two variations of one language, as they are not the same? Jmurphy042000 (talk) 04:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The default for international organisations is British English. For example, Americans working for NATO have to use British English. Doesn’t cause these organisations any problems 86.3.134.204 (talk) 06:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand, however, that wasn't what I stated. I stated that the correct grammar should be reflected in the language they are viewing. As an American, who knows many Americans not framiliar with British English, it does cause problems. You're speaking of a world wide organization. That's like saying all scientists understand latin. Why? To stop the confusion you mentioned. However this is a different circumstance, is it not? If I am in American, reading American English I would expect to see that vocabulary used. Tyres in the UK is Tires in America. There are differences. Another example would be the slang term "boot". It is 2 vastly different things in America versus the UK. Jmurphy042000 (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, Wikipedia is technically an American organization, not an international organization. Just because it is on the Web doesn't mean it is "international". It is technically an American non-profit. Which would mean the default language is... American English. Jmurphy042000 (talk) 00:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 30, 2006

message: 
Because these pages are reused at Portal:Featured content, please replace the redlink in this blurb with the free image :Image:1973 sinai war maps.jpg. Thanks. Carcharoth 17:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 17:58, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image replacement available
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 8, 2006

message: 
Because these pages are reused at Portal:Featured content, please replace the redlink in this blurb with the free image :Image:Kakapo2.jpg. Thanks. Carcharoth 17:29, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, though I think :Image:Strigops habroptilus, face.jpg looks cuter :) --- RockMFR 18:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image replacement available
Talk:Residence card of a family member of a Union citizen

message: The German article for "Residence Card of a family member of a Union citizen" is de:Aufenthaltskarte, not de:European Economic Area Family Permit.  The latter is the German article for European Economic Area Family Permit. Qwerta369 (talk) 10:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  German article 

message: Germany requires to carry the wedding certificate when traveling together. Residence card alone is not sufficient. (Information from German Embassy in London)
:Those are UK requirements after May took over the home office. At least gov.uk says so, even though that would be illegal as long as the UK is still in the EU. The Schengen area should be the same everywhere. There isn't much room for the German government to change the rules. --There-is-life-on-mars (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  German requirement 

message: The European Union has rules about Residence cards for people who have residence permits for various reasons, not only family member of a Union citizen. Does anyone know anything about them? There is a red link to an article  Residence card (European Union). There are three German article, :de:Aufenthaltskarte (Deutschland), :de:Daueraufenthaltskarte (Deutschland), :de:Aufenthaltskarte, about both Residence card of a family member and Residence card in general.--BIL (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence card
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 11, 2006

message: 
Please remove the redlink left behind by a deletion made at Commons. I looked for a free alternative, but could not find any. Thanks. Carcharoth 17:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 18:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlink needs removing
Talk:Abrau-Dyurso

message: Regarding this, I guess I should have specified that I was looking for something to support the statement that Abrau-Dyurso consists of two locations, which, judging from how the sentence is structured, are not contiguous.  Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been there as a child, and I may assure you that Abrau and Durso are geographically distinct settlements. Try googling for "от Абрау до Дюрсо". --Ghirla-трёп- 18:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Слово к делу не пришьёшь" :)  I've added something I quickly found, but would you by any chance happen to know of any better source?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think anyone is likely to dispute the fact. Compare the location of Lake Abrau and the Durso river on this map. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the map—I didn't have a map of the area that detailed, hence the uncertainty on my part.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You are welcome. --Ghirla-трёп- 13:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I finally found something that confirms that Abrau-Dyurso and Dyurso are two separate villages, not parts of the same village, and made the corrections to the article.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: On the web at google, search for "abrau durso".  You will get many hit to websites shuch as the winery.  Why not change the name of the page to that Durso instead of Dyurso  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.211.30 (talk) 05:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling is per Wikipedia romanization guidelines.  Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not Durso?
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 21, 2007

message: 
Because these pages are reused at Portal:Featured content, please replace the redlink in this blurb with the free image :Image:Triceratops brussels email.jpg. Thanks. Carcharoth 17:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 18:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image replacement available
Talk:David Matas

message: I'm keeping it to just the facts.  Frankly much of what I deleted was just inflammatory rhetoric which damaged the NPoV of the article.Simonm223 (talk) 22:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to Human Rights section 

message: I'll be taking this conversation to the falun gong talk page but since it started over an edit on this page I thought I'd note it on this talk page too.Simonm223 (talk) 12:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  / PerEdman 13:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Simonm223, would you like to explain how you believe "worshippers" is relevant?  / PerEdman 22:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Oh sorry, I think Simonm223 means the rest of the discussion can be taken at the falun gong talk page.  / PerEdman 22:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: THat is what I meant.  And I believe this discussion has since been mostly resolved.Simonm223 (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worshippers 

message: This template is no longer necessary. I recommend to remove it as soon as possible. Doritdi (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification Template
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 23, 2007

message: The inline image link needs removing. Standard procedure for fair-use images is to remove them from the TFA blurbs. Carcharoth 17:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 20:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline link needs removing
Talk:Sharp Aquos

message: How does the Aquos line differe from the non-Aquos branded sets?  Is this just a marketing exercise?  Lyle 17:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Parallel (video)

message: Is it taken from the lyrics to "Romance"? - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 18:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of name

message: There are a number of claims in this article.  None of them are sourced despite the article being fact-tagged for over six months.  Wikipedia core policy is that all claims in articles should be verifiable and cited with inline citations.  Otherwise it's just synthesis and original research.
Since one editor apparently feels the tag at the top of the article to be insufficient, I have tagged several major claims with  to accomodate his/her request and to allow some time for sources to be added. N2e (talk) 03:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and sources are needed
Talk:Silent Disco

message: As requested I have removed point of view content but have restored the factual information on the origins of a Silent Disco. If any one feels that the facts I have restored are for some reason unsuitable can we please disuss it rather than continually removing the text. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dizzyhead (talk • contribs) 15:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view 

message: (Completed Bigruzzy (talk) 19:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: 80.41.238.106 (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think your website is suitable for linking.  It has no content which can be said to be suitable reference material.  (It also is optimized for use by Internet Explorer, by the way... if you want your site to appeal to the 'technorati', you should look into using a web author who writes code that adheres to the official specifications, so it works on all browsers.)  However, you might have good look exchanging links with some other sites.  If you had a 'links' page... User:Pedant (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  web site 

message: I have noticed that there is a bit of an edit war going on, with one particular external link being replaced and removed repeatedly. What is happening with this link? The Baroness of Morden (talk) 11:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:ELNO for the types of external links not permitted in Wikipedia. Those that are commercial are included. Instead of constantly undoing edits, could those involved in this edit war please discuss the issues surrounding the removal of the links in question? That would be more helpful than just undoing other people's edits. The Baroness of Morden (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting external link 

message: i believe this genre was invented by Brendan Kenneally  in the 70s  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.3.83 (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  b kenneally 

message: I've recently reverted edits by  numerous times. I argue that this version of the article, while shorter, is more encyclopedic, free from unverifiable original research, and has the proper tone and style required of our encyclopedia. I welcome any comments. --ZimZalaBim talk 14:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits by Dizzyhead
Talk:Shafi Imam Rumi

message: Rumi is one of the major character of Jahanara Imam's Ekatturer Dinguli. The article does not say much about the book yet, but it is one of the most books regarding Bangladesh Liberation War. It is one of the best seller in the history of Bangladesh. Anisul Hoque nobel Maa was written based on this book. So as a main character of the book, Rumi deserves an article. Besides he is an ambassador of the guerrillas who risked their lives during their operation at the army packed city of Dhaka in 1971. He himself was part of an active group of Crack Platoon who ran numerous well known attacks on Pakistan Army. I also read the Wikipedia:Notablity (people) article and saw it meets the criteria. So why it should be speedy deleted. --Tarif from Bangladesh 18:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why
Talk:Such a Shame

message: Such A Shame (Sandra song) → Such A Shame — Only requested this after I found out that the Sandra Cretu song is a cover of Talk Talk's original and that I have never seen cover songs being given their own pages, if they are they tend to be merged into the page about the original song, also this page needs to have a section about the Talk Talk original —Willirennen 18:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Hinugot sa Langit

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0301405/plotsummary. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  20:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jon Randall

message: My suggestion is. Hope you are interested in my writing and music. Everyone  you’ve work with are all my favourites. What a honour to record with you. I know. Independent artist. Bout your sound is awesome. There a contact on my website. Hope to hear from you. Congrats 174.112.162.89 (talk) 21:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New EP Never New Love by Rickandvalcountrymusic.com
Talk:Blokovi

message: Please, keep in mind that Wikipedia is encyclopedia and not a soapbox. --millosh (talk (meta:)) 18:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides you didn't read what the article soapbox is about, the lyrics of the song belongs to the field of original research. And, besides all of that, lyrics are completely irrelevant. So, please, read first What Wikipedia is not and then continue to contribute. --millosh (talk (meta:)) 10:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

text: BTW, I appreciate your work on articles about Novi Beograd. However, a lot of the content which you added is completely without sources. Please, find sources and then continue to add content. Otherwise, only the most obvious facts would be able to stay inside of the articles. --millosh (talk (meta:)) 10:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Note that I am not rigid toward added content and that it is completely possible that if someone more rigid comes here a lot of your work may become deleted only because you are insisting on completely irrelevant, unsourced and trivial content. --millosh (talk (meta:)) 10:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

text: There are 2 issues here. The first issue is what is considered "original research"; the second, what is considered to be irrelevant. 
So, let us see policy on original research, indeed. The definition of original research is:
 "1. Primary (original) research such as proposing theories and solutions, original ideas, defining terms, coining new words."
By quoting the song I am certainly not providing any "new theories or solutions," nor I am "defining terms, coining new words." The song given (which, is, btw, a common knowledge in blokivi), is not original research. Besides, much of the article is not quoted anyhow; singling out my contribution as "not being quoted" is laughable. 
Now, moving on to the "irrelevance" issue. I have posted the song, and thus I clearly think that it is relevant. Another 2 wiki users have taken time to translate the Serbian text I have posted into English, and thus they clearly think it is relevant. You, on the other hand, are the only user who has claimed the "irrelevance" so far. You are clearly in the minority. Even a casual observer, who has never visited Blokovi, or Serbia for that matter, can see why the text of the song that equates Blokovi with Ghetto is relevant in the section called "The public image of blokivi." 
Frankly, I cannot believe that we are having a discussion about this. This is ridiculous. I have wasted enough of my time on this as is. 
- Ketzman  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.66.150.198 (talk) 03:15, August 30, 2007 (UTC) 
#You didn't provide relevant source and I think that you make this song. So, from my point of view, you did original research. --millosh (talk (meta:)) 23:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abaeus

message: All information here is represented in the article Abae. Stubs created simply to correspond to Smith's Dictionary are likely to be dictionary entries or gazetteer entries not encyclopedia topics. Any issues with turning this into a simple redirect? --Wetman 23:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: None. Can we get an adult to make this a redirect?--Wetman (talk) 08:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:List of rivers of Georgia (country)

message: Added footnote for rivers in the Abkhzakia AR.   Not sure why there are two tables.
-- Talk to G Moore 14:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Template talk:Sangam literature

message: Sangam lit is not equal to Tamil lit, it is a subset of it.Thanks Taprobanus 19:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sangam li versus Tamil lit

message: According to the article Patiṉeṇkīḻkaṇakku, that collection was created during the post-Sangam era. If that is true, why is it included in this template? utcursch | talk 16:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, we should either take it out or at least add a clarifying footnote. Zvelebil considers the Patiṉeṇkīḻkaṇakku as post-sangam literature. 73.217.17.81 (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've moved it under "Related topics" for now. Perhaps it's better to create a separate template for it. utcursch | talk 13:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patiṉeṇkīḻkaṇakku
Talk:Ozhaguscodaywayquay

message: In First Peoples, First Voices by Penny Petrone, it says she is the eldest daughter, but the John Johnston page says she is the youngest?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckb187 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is a very old comment, but it looks like there's a discrepancy between Henry Rowe Schoolcraft (who says youngest) and Anna Jameson (who says eldest). HarvisReads (talk) 21:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Name and Rank of Birth?

message: — Assignment last updated by HarvisReads (talk) 22:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Public History

message: I know it's not a simple process to change the title of an article, but is "Ozhaguscodaywayquay" the best spelling to go with? I would nominate "Oshahgushkodanaqua" since that's how Anna Jameson spells it, and I think it comes up in scholarship more often. HarvisReads (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name/Title of Article
Talk:Johnnie Hoskins

message: Article says born 1892 in Waitara NZ; the online Registrar-General historical records have a John Stark Hoskins born in NZ on 16 April 1892 to Isabel and William but they do not give location online. And the birth shown as registered in 2002 (late registration or correction?) Hugo999 (talk) 09:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born 1892 when?
Talk:Largs railway station

message: RAILSCOT | Photographs of Largs has the description "Accident at Largs on 11 July 1995 involving the 0615 service from Glasgow Central. The trains brakes failed, it hit the buffers, jumped 3 feet in the air, ran on through the station, then through the shops on Main Street. [Witness statement at the time]. Remarkably there were no serious injuries...but Largs station was never the same again!" [italics in original] dunno if that's a good source, . . dave souza, talk 19:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Source re. crash

message: Largs station (C) Thomas Nugent :: Geograph Britain and Ireland shows the reconstructed station, and could be uploaded as an illustration for this article. . dave souza, talk 21:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It was uploaded in February 2011, and may be found at :File:Largs station - geograph.org.uk - 961364.jpg. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Informative photo
Talk:Gracie Barra Combat Team

message: The result was merge into Gracie Barra Combat Team. -- Unak78 (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Merge and redirect. The merged article won't be too big at all. Sancho 04:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Merging makes sense since Gracie Barra can cover both the organization and the team just as Chute Boxe Academy is listed as one of the teams for instance. Shawnc (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Gracie Barra

message: I am no longer going to merge Gracie Barra into this article, but rather this article into the Gracie Barra article owing to the larger subject matter umbrella provided of the title and due to a known redirect already in existence in order to avoid a double re-direct.Unak78 11:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Turtle Island (disambiguation)

message: I'm moving some of the more disambiguation-inappropriate info here provided for some of the redlinks since they may be needed when someone finally decides to create those articles. Shrumster 19:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporary