lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wei wei

message: Hello 0101Mak!
Do you know that this page needs to be merged with another WeiWei?
Today the tutor said she will only recognised the other one as the "true" one. Please try to merge this one to the other. We've to work together as a team!
Wishes,
0101HUNGmm
Hello, guys!
Do you know how to make a external links? I would like to make one but failed to do so! Please help me!
0101Hmm
:See Wikipedia:External links for various useful info, but basically:
:Put description here
:For example:
:Google search engine
:becomes
:Google search engine
:—Stormie 09:25, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your help
Hello, i just found that there is another page about wei wei in wikipedia. However, the name is a bit different, If u search " Wei Wei" instead of "wei wei", then u will be linked to that page.
I think we have to merge 2 pages together in order to go on. Unfortunately, i don't really know 
how to merge 2 pages, So, could anyone help???
:Hi, 
:as i said on the other article's talk page, merging is pretty easy - we just have to settle on one of the two articles (I think Wei Wei is the correct spelling, so we should use that one), then make sure all information is in that article. Then we can redirect the other article there (which means that if anyone searches for "Wei wei" he will automatically be redirected to "Wei Wei"), and the merge is finished :)
:-- Ferkelparade π 11:07, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Radio Paradise

message: Ryz 07:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: notability 

message: I just cleaned up this article's external links in accordance with our guidelines and there were some links which qualify as reliable sources so I'm going to list them here if anybody would like to use them to build up the article. 
* Time Magazine article 
* Interview with Bill Goldsmith on Planet Geek!
* And Now For Some *Real* Radio: The death of corporate rock radio. Readers extol glorious alternatives. Listen up!
:ThemFromSpace 03:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the Time Magazine article and Planet Geek! interview back in as references in appropriate and added points in the article. Ronald Joe Record (talk) 21:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just added another couple of references; surely there are enough now for the article's contents to qualify as well-cited? Christopher (talk) 16:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the refimprove template. Thanks for the additional citations! Ronald Joe Record (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Radio Paradise has also the name of an offshore radio station off the Netherlands. 2.221.93.93 (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other radio paradises
Talk:Aurora, Nebraska

message: Should i add the stuff about the youth center here? I live here. Im just wondering —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Masterm900 (talk • contribs) 02:17, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please feel free to improve the article. —Bkell (talk) 16:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The youth center? 
Talk:Wang Hsing-ching

message: I'm finding it really difficult to search for info! Anyone have any suggestions?
I entered his Chinese pen name 南方朔 into www.baidu.com (like chinese google) Baidu came up with 11,000 hits.  take a look. don't forget to sign off with messages with your linked login name.  JMSC0101 TA-- Li
Atttn: 0101WONGwsc
I am just wondering if you can put up the source to Wang's talk "How to build a mass media with "taste"?". Thanks!
-- [0101CHEUNGwl]
We can also try to look for his books in the library for analyzing his approach in writing and commenting on current affairs. Work hard!
-- [0101LEUNGsf]
Please time sign off with your login name and time stamp by entering putting Lfcho 03:13, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Research 

message: Hey folks,
though i like the book cover display idea, the grid with chinese title, english title, pinying, publishing date is taking up way too much room and a waste of valuable space.  
(JMSC0101 TA - Li) Lfcho 17:00, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grid takes up too much room 

message: According to the article, this individual was educated in Taiwan and has predominantly written for the Taiwanese media.  There is no reference to an active career in China.  Thus, currently the "Taiwanese journalist" category is used. Shawnc 12:22, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 
Talk:Redcap (TV series)

message: I'm curious as to the source of the information that Red Cap is entering its third season. Last I heard, the BBC had announced that they weren't going to make any more. -- Necrothesp 18:17, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: The entry text states that 3 episodes are missing yet the breakdown seem to indicate only 2? 109.145.228.99 (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing episodes 

message: Brian Cox (actor) has just published his new autobiography ‘ putting the rabbit in the hat ‘ and mentioned that David Bowie was in a number of episodes.[] Inadvertent Consequences (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Bowie
Talk:Sydsvenskan

message: I'm sorry, I'm taking out the sentence "For foreign readers this newspaper is peculiar inasmuch as minor deviations from Stockholm/Gothenburg based newspapers in regard to Swedish language grammar, orthography and vocabulary seem consistently enforced" The combination of  "deviations" with "enforced" doesn't make sense. I also don't understand why anything to do with Swedish grammar, orthography and vocabulary is supposed to be interesting especially to foreign readers. If you wrote the sentence, or understand these things, please clarify and re-insert! --Bishonen 19:12, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for removing it, this opinionated slander very obviously did not follow the WP:NPOV policy. Tomas e (talk) 21:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Tsirelson space

message: 1. Thank you for your interest in `my space'.
2. I bother that your definition of T leaves the reader in doubt about
existence and uniqueness of T, since nothing is stated about existence
and uniqueness of V.  In fact, such V as you define exists (which is not
evident!) but is not unique.
3. About your references.  Among more than 100 relevant papers you selected
three (Tsirelson 1974; Figiel, Johnson 1974; Spinka 2002).  I wonder,
what is your selection criterion?  Is the polynomial reflexivity of S(T)
more important or relevant than such works as
    1989 Casazza, Shura "Tsirelson's space"
    1994 Gowers "A solution to Banach's hyperplane problem"
    1994 Odell, Schlumprecht "The distortion problem"
    1995 Odell, Schlumprecht "Distortion and stabilized structure..."
    1996 Gowers "A new dichotomy for Banach spaces"
    2001 Ortiz "An omitting types theorem for positive bounded formulas..."
and others?
4. More than 100 such references are collected on the relevant page of my
site, here:
Maybe, an external link to it could be appropriate.
--Boris Tsirelson
:Its an honour to have you comment. Articles in Wikipedia may often be incomplete or stilted; knowledgable readers are invited to make corrections and additions. In time, it is hoped that a number of editors can fashion an article that is more complete, accurate and comprehensive than any one person can easily achieve. linas 05:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I don't much like the way the space is introduced: the unit ball of c0
satisfies 1-4, so what?  You have to wait  "weakly compact", somewhat hidden outside what
seems to be the main point, to get to the real thing.
Why not say that A is the "smallest" such set? Bdmy (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, indeed! The smallest such set is exactly the definition. Clearly, this article was written by careless non-experts. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah! I see that you make a point not to edit this article yourself !!! Anonymous best regards, Bdmy (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  For two reasons. First, it is not a good idea, to write here about oneself. Second, if the only editor that wish and can to describe a topic here is the author then probably the topic is not worth to be described here. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Jaguar AJ6 engine

message: The article is inaccurate in its description of the AJ6 engines. 
(1) The original engines were the DOHC 3.6 (which debuted on the XJ-S in ~1983 and was the used in the new XJ40 from its launch in 1986) and the SOHC 2.9 (which was used for the entry-level XJ6 in Britain and Europe - but rarely, if ever, seen in models exported to the US). 
(2). The DOHC 3.6 was revised and enlarged to 4.0 in 1990. It is still essentially an "AJ6", however. This was, as per usual, offered for the XJ-S before it was built into the XJ40 saloon. 
(3). The SOHC 2.9, which was generally considered somewhat underpowered for such a large car, was discontinued in 1992 and replaced with a DOHC 3.2 (essentially identical to the DOHC 4.0). 
(4). Following the launch of the Aston Martin DB7 - a car based on Jaguar's original replacement platform for the XJ-S (which was discarded in favour of the XK8 based on the X300 platform, note the traditional Jaguar 6-dial dashboard and ski-slope) - the Jaguar AJ6 was used by Aston Martin as well (a tweaked and supercharged 3.2). 
(5). Both the 3.2 and 4.0 were substantially revised for the 1994 launch of the new X300 saloon. *These* are the "AJ16" engines, both now featuring coil-on-plug distributorless ignition, new engine management systems, magnesium alloy heads, etc. 
(6). A supercharged version of the new AJ16 DOHC 4.0 was used on the X300 XJR. 
(7). The AJ16 was discontinued with the launch of the AJ-V8 (XK8 and XJ8 in 1996/7).
:OK, I've incorporated this into the article.  --SFoskett 14:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections which need to be made
Talk:Jaguar AJ-V6 engine

message: Is this the same as Jaguar AJ6 engine?
:Nope, the Jaguar AJ6 engine is a straight-6 developed by Jaguar.  The Jaguar AJ-V6 engine is a V6 based on the Ford Duratec 30. --SFoskett 20:57, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
::Ah. Thanks for explaining it. Bobblewik  (talk) 20:55, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: AJ126 has nothing to do with a Ford V6. It is a modification of the AJ133 Jaguar V8 and thus is a Jaguar designed and owned engine. The block has the same external dimensions as the V8. LewisR (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AJ126 

message: The timeline at the bottom seems to be in the wrong time period, like, 1930-1970, while this seems to be from ~2000 Tttmaker (talk) 12:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thing at the bottom seems to be in the wrong time period
Talk:I Love the '90s (American TV series)

message: I have added the "Partial list of featured ideas and happenings from the 90s" list.
It only has one item as of yet.
Is that a good idea? I thought it would be helpful.
a{h}
: It would be nice if this information was sorted by episode/year. -- Netoholic @ 20:23, 2005 Jan 27 (UTC)
:: I was thinking the same thing.  If anyone has this TiVo'd, it'd be nice to have that information. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 20:31, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
Needs pictures and further broadcast / DVD (?) info.
Be nice if someone could consolidate all of the episode pages into one page saying all of them are pretty much stubs. Just a thought. Galactor213 04:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another problem is that they're UScentric. I added details of the UK show to I Love 1970, but it's difficult to find lists of topics covered on every episode. I don't even know if that list's complete. BillyH 04:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

message: All the individual episodes should be merged into this page since they're all stubs, have little potential of being expanded, and this page is also a stub. I'm marking the various other decades/seasons as well.  There should probably be a centralized discussion for all of the seasons.  Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 20:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Department store

message: A department store is a retail establishment offering a wide range of consumer goods in different areas of the store, each area ("department") specializing in a product category. In modern major cities, the department store made a dramatic appearance in the middle of the 19th century, and permanently reshaped shopping habits, and the definition of service and luxury. 27.60.101.89 (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ggg 

message: . 103.87.56.197 (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainline departmant store 

message: Currently we have the above two named pages. This page Department store has gaping holes (sections with just headers), while Department stores by country has some of the same information, but more detail from around the world (less American focused). Should we merge both pages? Then trim the unreferenced? Or is there another way to improve this article? Possibly generalising the department store page with headline info and leaving detail on the country page?Davidstewartharvey (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Department store]] & [[Department stores by country]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Heinzam (talk) 19:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HIST 463 Consumerism in Modern America
Talk:Stanley Rader

message: I have created a basic entry for Stanley Rader to link with Herbert W. Armstrong, Worldwide Church of God, etc. MPLX/MH 20:13, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At times, this article on Stanley Rader seems to be more about his rival Garner Ted Armstrong than about the man himself.  I think part of the problem is that the article serves (at least) two distinct purposes:  To tell of the man, Stanley Rader; and to tell of the church with which he was involved.  I'm thoroughly editing the article at Worldwide Church of God to relieve this article of the latter burden.  This article should likewise be edited to tell only of the subject of the article. -- SwissCelt 03:40, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realigning Worldwide Church of God articles 

message: Nice detailed article, but it has a lot of points which are not backed up by sources. Also, some of the language indicates there may be NPOV issues, but I am clueless in this subject area. This article would have a lot to gain from some review of its factual accuracy. --Gmaxwell 20:21, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy check
Talk:Benai Israel

message: We really need to consolidate Bnai Israel, Bnai Yisrael (there should be a redirect), and Children of Israel.—iFaqeer | Talk to me! 20:21, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
*All article now redirect to Children of Israel. Thank you. IZAK 10:44, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Consolidation
Category talk:Hellenic scripts

message: Linear A is hardly a "hellenic script", and the Disk of Phaistos could be, but then it could be anything at all... dab 20:54, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. This category was made to be as inclusive as possible. Etz Haim 21:32, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boswil

message: I will be heavily altering this article until the end of this month attemping to add more to the article (probably using Google translator), and then making sure what comes out makes sense.  Wish me luck ;-) --Mozillaman 00:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did my best. I think it's at least ready to have the copyedit tag removed, if not the verify tag. I did quite a bit of cross referencing related wiki articles, but mostly to assist in cleaning up the translation in the history section, and not so much to verify accuracy. It's even possible I inadvertently created some inaccuracies of my own. OH well . . . . it's a hell of a lot easier to read.shabbs 13:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Revamping

message: from VfD:
Pumpie is constantly translating articles from the German wiki using Babelfish. This is just another example of a badly translated text. Not a single sentence is grammatically correct. I bet Pumpie doesn't even know a single word of German. --Voyager ch 21:11, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous Delete Discussion
Talk:Wohlen–Dietikon railway line

message: from VfD:
Another one of Pumpie's "translations" using Babelfish. I simply don't have time to keep an eye on all my German articles. Please delete. --Voyager ch 21:18, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Birmenstorf

message: from VfD: 
Just another "collaboration" of Pumpie and Babelfish. Get rid of this nonsense. --Voyager ch 21:26, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Timeline of liberal parties in the Netherlands

message: I deleted the remarks on the Green Left. I read remarks by Femke Halsema on the leftist liberal position of her party, and her liberalism is certainly close to my liberalism, but there is not yet a sign that it is a position shared by most of the party, considering its socialist roots. Let's wait a while. --Gangulf 21:29, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Lenzburg

message: from VfD:
Pumpie strikes back! ;-) Could someone please stop him doing this nonsense? --Voyager ch 21:44, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep. but it is pretty bad Babel. I've cleaned the first two paras - nag me to clean up the rest. What's there is more or less correct, but some uncleaned sections could be deleted wholesale as I can do far better translating by hand. -Wikibob | Talk 21:35, 2004 Oct 6 (UTC)
* Keep. Needs cleanup, not deletion. Factitious 06:58, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
* Keep. Could someone please stop listing stupid stuff here? Intrigue 18:18, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Argument Clinic

message: The song has been removed from the YouTube website, should the link be deleted?
There's plenty of other clips of it on You Tube, I just changed the link to another one  25px Hamish (Talk) 12:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The song 

message: There's another version of this skit, where he first walks into the "abuse room" and gets called names, before he goes to the argument room. There should be some mention of that, if anybody knows more about it than my vague recollection. -129.97.18.183 01:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Version 

message: I have removed the section "In popular culture", which described an allusion to The Argument Sketch on House (TV series). "In popular culture" sections should help explain the significance of a subject and not simply list appearances. Cnilep (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 'In popular culture' section 

message: Still no Dr Who cross-over analysis?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.132.112 (talk) 07:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would there be?  This is a Monty Python article. - Denimadept (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross over 

message: The article begins "The Argument Sketch (officially titled Argument Clinic)". This is correct, the title according to the official Monty Python youtube channel is "Argument Clinic". 
The article should be moved to "Argument Clinic". However, I can't do this because article "Argument Clinic" already exists, redirecting to "The Argument Sketch". This should be the other way round, so I've added a request for deletion to "Argument Clinic". cagliost (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Better? - Denimadept (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you, however the title according to the youtube channel is just "Argument Clinic", not "The Argument Clinic". Could you change it again? See Wikipedia:Article_titles#Article_title_format. Thanks cagliost (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried, and ran into your issue. (sigh) - Denimadept (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

text: I followed the instructions given when the move failed.  See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. - Denimadept (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Denimadept (talk) 21:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant, well done! Thanks cagliost (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arguement clinic. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Arguement clinic" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Zeved habat

message: Hollekreisch and zeved habat are not the same thing at all. I recently posted a French wikipedia page for Hollekreisch and plan to do the same for English and German. At the moment however, "Hollekreisch" leads to the page "zeved habat," which is blocking me from creating a new page. Any tips on how to proceed would be welcome. LGLou (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hollekreisch
Talk:Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland

message: Since there appear to be no consensus issues surrounding the article I have removed the associated tag. ► Philg88 ◄ talk 11:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus 

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=vwRp8-H9NxsC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=qaJSAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=5J6gAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=saJDAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=MwABAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 19:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications 

message: There seemed to be lack of clarity regarding whether elected Fellows are entitled to use the post-nominal letters FRAS since they do not appear in the Society's published bye-laws. As a Fellow of the RAS, I have received clarification from the Executive Officer of the Society in an email on 18 May 2021 that Fellows are indeed entitled to use FRAS post-nominals. This is a much better source of authority than the old lists of peerages etc currently cited which demonstrate historical usage but not entitlement to that usage. I am not sure how this can best be referenced in the article.
: Unfortunately it cannot be, as it would be original research. If there is an entitlement, as opposed to a customary use (which is what the current sources show) this needs to be published rather than written in a private letter. Normally, such an entitlement, regarding a chartered body, is given in the statutes, public regulations, etc. of the society in question (i.e. the Byelaws and Standing Orders in this case); indeed if it is not in the society's rules, it's hard to see under what rules such an entitlement would exist. Robminchin (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If they weren't entitled to use the post-nominal letters FRAS, there would be no reason for the society's publications (some cited in this article) to list individuals WITH said post-nominal letters. Stands to reason.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.233.106 (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entitlement of Fellows to use post-nominal letters FRAS
Talk:Nicolaes Maes

message: The 1911 text says there are five works by Maes in the National Gallery, London, but the NG website shows seven:A Woman scraping Parsnips, The Idle Servant, A Little Girl rocking a Cradle, Christ blessing the Children, Portrait of a Man in a Black Wig, Portrait of an Elderly Man in a Black Robe and Portrait of Jan de Reus. I wonder what happened to the "Card Players"...? --rbrwr± 22:59, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Late with the answer, but The "Card Players" was reattributed (see here). The text is from a very old copyright-free source and is no doubt riddled with equally out of date inaccuracies... Mabalu (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled