Talk:Murder of Angelika Kluk

message: To User:172.203.78.242: The numerous links you have added to the Angelika Kluk article fall far outside what is considered appropriate for Wikipedia.  Particularly in light of how there's virtually no content in the article itself.  The articles themselves may be useful in writing and properly referencing the article, but they do not belong en masse, and do not take the place of a proper article.  Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, particularly Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files.  I've posted this both on your IP's talk page and on the talk page of this article.  Ford MF 17:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Angelika Kluk and excessive external links

message: What is notable here is not so much the person as the criminal case itself. For those of you in the dark (the dark generally taken to mean the dark containent of North America - into which no light from the outside may reach but from which plenty of rubbish does pour forth) this article is referring to a high profile murder case currently still in court in Scotland. Details of the case include an alcoholic, Catholic priest who admitted a prior sexual relationship with the victim (who was accommodated as staff of the church at the time of her death) after previously lying to police about it. 
I would not have thought a worthwhile entry could be written for the case, while it is still in court, but countless newspaper articles and TV news items throughout the UK and the British media online certainly reflect the notability of the case. I would be very surprised if there hasn't been equal coverage in Poland. Furthermore, if I may cite precedent, Wikipedia is chock full of articles on 'famous' murders, rapes and kidnappings  - listed under the names of either the victims or the perpurtrators and largely consisting of cases little known outside North America.
When a verdict has been reached and the contents of this entry may be more than a mixture of speculation and coverage of current affairs, it should be given some attention. until then I don't see why it should be deleted. --JamesTheNumberless 14:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NPA , please avoid personal attacks against Wikipedians from and the inhabitants of North America. Edison 19:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, but it's such fun! In all seriousness, there is an afwul lot of uncontested trivia on Wikipedia that is arguably less notable than this case. --JamesTheNumberless 13:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argument against deletion 

message: The article requires merging as without merging Therese may fail to meet the required notability standards. This would also reduce information disparity and improve the overall article coverage.--Lucy-marie (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with merging this page with Peter Tobin. As harsh as it sounds, Kluk is notable for being a murder victim, which usually only warrants inclusion in the murder's article. Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Special_cases and WP:1E support this. momoricks (make my day) 03:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge into Peter Tobin. If this article is to be kept, it should be renamed Murder of Angelika Kluk, in line with other articles about murders of otherwise non-notable people. Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 01:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs to be merged, pronto.--Zucchinidreams (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: The article includes both Kluk and Kluck; which is correct? Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 01:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of surname