lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NV1

message: The intro to this page is extremely abrupt, and unclear.  What was the NV1? We know when it was released and what it had, but not what it is.  I would fix it my self, but I dont know what it is.
:Hope I've fixed this now ThomasHarte
::I think the article is still confusing. It makes several references to Sega Saturn, how the relationship with with Sega "changed" and how nVidia was affected by the relative failure of the Saturn, BUT, it does not state anything regarding what the Saturn has to do with NV1 in the first place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kungmidas (talk • contribs) 20:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The intro to this page

message: It rendered quadratic surfaces?  That can't be right.  Quadrilaterals, maybe?  Is there an article that details this rendering approach and how it differs from polygonal rendering? Phlake 14:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NV2 and the Sega Saturn used the same technique. I believe it's actually called "quadratic texture mapping". I bet a Google search would find some good info. --Swaaye 21:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After some looking, I agree that's the term.  I have not yet found any detailed information about how it works or how it differs from the conventional polygonal rendering methods, however.  Still looking, there. -- Phlake 19:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

text: From : "In addition, the Diamond Edge 3D can create realistic 3D graphics by using nine control points to create a curved surface, called quadratic texture mapping (QTM)." The Sega Saturn used plain quadrilaterals, so there really is very little in common between the two. 85.156.236.246 12:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quadratic? 

message: Is the NV1 a graphics card or GPU? I don't know much about this topic, but the Microprocessor Report described the NV1 as a chip developed by Nvidia and fabricated by SGS-Thomson. Rilak (talk) 01:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphics card or GPU? 

message: Does anybody know what the ethernet port was used for?  I find no mention of it on the arcived Diamond Multimedia page, nor in the drivers that you can download from their website.  Win95 doesn't even recognise it's there... Dominar_Rygel_XVI (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That was the digital game port connector - instead of including a standard game port NVIDIA used an RJ45 -> game port adapter. Even back when the card was new it seems that no-one used it. There's a photo here. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The ethernet port
Talk:Abbotsford, Scottish Borders

message: I have reasons to believe that the edits made on 21 May 2010 are copyright violations from a pamphelet:
*Abbotsford by Walter Maxwell-Scott (Sir.), James Clarkson Corson (Photo Precision, 1969).
This is because some of the text starts with new lines (as such copies often do when cup and pasted from another source) and phrases taken from the text added on that day, when searched using Google Books returns that pamphlet. However as the pamphlet is not available to view under Google Books I can not view the page to confirm it visually.
So although I suspect a copyright issue, I am removing the text under WP:BURDEN, and before it is returned sources should be added as specified in WP:BURDEN. --PBS (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issues
Talk:Space (French band)

message: 1. Marouani himself, on his Facebook page, indicated that Monaco is the right city. The easiest way to leave the designation is "French group";
2. The participation of Joe Hammer in the "founding group" is not confirmed. His name officially appears on the second album "Space". In addition to Marouani, only the arranger Roland Romanelli and singer Madeline Bell was indicated as the official member of the group on the Magic Fly album https://www.discogs.com/Space-Magic-Fly/release/1477116
3. The active composition of the group is listed on the group’s page on Facebook https://web.facebook.com/pg/Didier.Marouani.et.spAce/about/?ref=page_internal
4. All albums of the group until 1980 were released under the name "Space". The name "Didier Marouani and SpAce" appeared much later and was not used constantly https://www.discogs.com/artist/5705-Space
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.87.157.130 (talk) 21:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information to correct errors and remove false data.
Talk:Core rope memory

message: > It could store 16 bit words at a density of 36,864 per cubic foot [...]
Hmm, that statement seems a little ambigous to me---see the subject heading. --Wernher 05:00, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 36,864 – 16-bit words per cubic foot... -- 205.175.225.5 01:31, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Words/ft&sup3; or bits/ft&sup3;?

message: As I recall, the IBM 360 model 30 used core ROM (for its microcode).  If so, that's presumably core rope memory -- which would predate the use in Apollo. Paul Koning (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the IBM used Magnetic core memory RAM, but not Core rope memory ROM.  I don't know about the model 30, but here's a pic of ROM from a model 20.  
-- aBSuRDiST  -T ☺ C- 03:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Electrologica X1 is definitely earlier: first delivered in 1958. I updated the text. Paul Koning (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier uses? 

message: The statement that rope memory uses the cores simply as transformers is incorrect. I'll work on supplying the correct description.  That will also make it clear why I mentioned EL X1 ROM; it differs from AGC rope memory in detail but the fundamental principle -- the use of bistable cores and their state transitions -- applies to both. Paul Koning (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No, it isn't transformers 

message: Wang used what appears to be the same technology for microcode ROM in their programmable calculators, late 1960's and early 1970's. 2048 fine wires woven through 43 "transformers" to form a 2048 43-bit-word ROM. Different form factor (does not resemble rope), but same technology. Wang 700 and 500 Series, and early Wang 600 Series used this technology. They later switched to mask-programmed semiconductor ROMs.
http://www.oldcalculatormuseum.com/wang720.html
Durgadas311 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's not the same technology.  The existing article confuses things and implies it is.  Rope memory uses memory type cores (square loop with hysteresis): in the first half of the read cycle, one core is set to 1 while the others remain at 0, then the second half, that core is reset back to 0, producing the data pulses in the sense wires.  The Wang ROM simply uses the cores as transformers (linear, no hysteresis).  Also, the addressing is different: in core rope, the cores do the decoding (essentially implementing a NOR function) while in the Wang ROM, there is a separate wire per address (linear select).  Paul Koning (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial Uses 

message: not "Memory" see this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P12r8DKHsak&t=60s  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.86.209 (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Old Lady Method
Talk:Al-Muqanna

message: ----
Al-Muqanna' is the title used by Britannica] I suppose the ' reflects an Ayn?  Which title is better? gren 05:01, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Actually, Muqanna didn't poisoned himself, but jumped into fire.Bek98 (talk) 20:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poisoned himself? 

message: "Zarrinkoob states that al-Muqanna was originally a goldsmith, who later studied material sciences. He also learned magic, spells, and trickery."
An arab author cannot be neutral about Muqanna. Arabs in order to discreditate Muqanna claimed that he was a triccer. Bek98 (talk) 20:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: "Hakim is a title for a learned or sage."
Actually, Hakim is a name of Muqanna's father. Hashim ibn Hakim. "Ibn" is used before father name. Bek98 (talk) 21:04, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hakim 

message: These editions by 82.36.156.18 might need some attention. I'll start with the wrong translation of Hāshem (instead of al-Muqanna‘) as The Veiled. --Pablo Tornielli (talk) 21:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions by 82.36.156.18 need revision
Talk:Neuroscience and intelligence

message: Presently in article: 
Although it is hard to pin intelligence on age based on cortical thickness due to different socioeconomic circumstances and education levels, older subjects (17 - 24) tended to have less variances in terms of intelligence than when compared to younger subjects (19 - 17).[34]
Found in cite: 
Younger participants (9 to 16 years old) demonstrated robust associations between cortical thickness and g scores while older participants (16 to 24 years old) did not.
Apart from numeric inconsistency, I'm not keen on translating this as "when compared to".  A significant result on A, followed by different significant result on B, is not the same as a significant result on A-B. 
I didn't look long and what I found might not be the passage excerpted, but surely the 19–17 is at least a typo. — MaxEnt 18:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sloppy extraction from cite?
Talk:American Family (artwork exhibition)

message: *Just googled the title and artist, found some interesting articles on the painting, but currently extremely busy to improve the article, will work more on it soon. Here's the links
Sir Jimmy 05:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Those links help establish why this article is notable, it really needs expansion however. -- Atamachat 21:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Related Links
Talk:Genesis 1:2

message: This was a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis 1:2 in 2005 as a VfD
Please reconsider deleting this article. Thanks,   — Jasonasosa 03:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Logawinner, you're responding to a comment from nearly seven years ago in connection with a deletion discussion that was held at that time, which concluded with the article being kept. Also, it was useless for Jasonasosa to post his request here as such commentary, in the case of an article that has been submitted for a  deletion discussion, is considered only if posted to that discussion  Largoplazo (talk) 21:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete

message: Shouldn't it be "tohu va-vohu", since there is no dagesh on the letter bet/vet? --91.115.11.41 (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  bohu or vohu? 

message: Should we raise it to B quality I don't think it's a C Logawinner (talk) 19:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: For assessment, we follow this quality grading scheme to determine it is B or C. Peace. JohnThorne (talk) 22:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raise to B quality 

message: Could someone please possibly look at the method used for transliteration at the top of this article please?  I understand the need for tonal changes, etc, but the transliteration for someone who has never read Hebrew before, is near impossible to understand.  I saw the example on the top of Genesis 1:1, and it was simple, easy to read...a whole world away from this one.  It would be helpful to find a way to standardise transliteration across these articles, if you don't have an agreed standard already.  Shalom to you all, Dane|Geld 10:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Transliteration
Talk:2005 Bolivia protests

message: Is it clear that this is a seperate topic?  I think this might be better folded into Bolivian Gas War?  
Also, there are many, many countries with corporations that have interests in natural resource exploitation in Bolivia, including Spain, Argentina, Brazil.  It's not just the U.S. DanKeshet 05:15, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
Some of the language used here is way to biased. 
"At issue is Bolivia's large natural gas reserves and the prospect for their future sale and use, as benefitting the local economy or benifitting foreign investors."
This for instance seems POV. Also, the page fails to talk about Bolivians in the Eastern part of the country seeking more autonomy and the fact that the protesters also argued against that as well. The article also fails to show why these protests started in the first place. They began because of a new law which raised taxes on foreign gas companies from 18% to 32%, the protesters felt that this was inadequate and called for all out nationalization. Furthermore, it fails to point out that parties like MAS have toned down there populist approach with regards to this issue. Evo Morales, who wanted taxes raised to 50%, even called the new law "middle ground". I will make the needed changes, but please try and keep this NPOV and based on facts. Jersey Devil 17:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: "Bolivia's reserves are worth over 1.2 billion USD".
It must be a mistake. I won't correct it because I don't know the correct value but it sounds definitely too low. I understand it as 1.2 E+9. Poszwa 01:31, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gas reserves value 

message: The merge has been done but i don't know why the edit line doesn't work. Tazmaniacs 05:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with [[Bolivian Gas War]]
Talk:Cardium pottery

message: Even though I added this article to the Category:Pottery - I have reservations.  Most of the article deals with the culture that produced this neolithic pottery.  I think the culture would be more appropriate for the title with a redirect for the pottery style.  Of course, more material on both subjects could make the article go either way.  Opinions?  WBardwin 05:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is definitely primarily about the culture, but such cultures are superficially characterized by the pottery, a convenient tag. Six of one half-dozen of the other. The issue is more work than the article.Dave (talk) 12:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: I dno't recall reading when the culture first appears in Eastern Adriatic fringe ? Hxseek (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When ?  

message: I see someone removed reference to "E3b" (more recently known as E1b1b1a) but they inserted a reference to Y haplogroup J being common in Catalonia. Sorry, but it is common in Asturias, but not Catalonia. The biggest survey is Adams et al.. So I have removed it. E1b1b1a has been associated with the Cardial in Italy, see Battaglia et al., so maybe it could be discussed in this more specific way (not referring to Catalonia). Otherwise the section is now effectively empty and meaningless and needs to be removed. The only connection I know of ever being suggested between IBERIAN Y Haplogroups and a possible Cardium connection is in a review I wrote, and the haplogroup was E1b1b1c (E-M123), which is found in unusual levels and types in Portugal and Galicia. See http://www.jogg.info/51/ . I leave to others to decide whether this is a relevant reference for this article.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics section 

message: This article discusses only the origin of this culture, but it says nothing about the characteristics (other than the pottery), the predecessors, the successors, etc. It does not even say when the culture ended.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.33.113.252 (talk) 07:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it has been some time since anyone spent time on this article and in a way probably most editors who have worked on it have only made quick efforts. It is clear this is an important subject that deserves better discussion. Someone just has to do it. Are you able to help?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 10:39, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree! such an article costs a lot of time and deserves all respect instead of a critque in such form. It cost me alone one hour to update two sentences to make them better understandable. So do it!HJJHolm (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lousy article
Talk:Dow University of Health Sciences

message: This article goes into quite a lot of detail about the construction of the college, but I'm not sure whether it should be left as-is or condensed into something else. Also, the timeline-ish format may paraprhase the source website a little too closely. Jeeves 05:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Contents of subject topic is being deleted without any established logic.
Neither Primary nor self-published source is cited.  Research contents qualify the Wikipedia:No original research#AEIS and content-material mainly derived from reliable secondary sources, no original publication such as  provided. In order to avoid labelling of promotion only secondary sources adopted for general awareness and promotion of hope in the larger interest of human being especially Pakistani nation.  This is not a promotion it is the very basis of each and every encyclopedia to encompass beneficial research to promote further development.  As far as my understanding this Sharing of knowledge is the core of WP. Research work of Dow University or any other institute of Pakistan is a global teamwork on Plasma basis therapy 
My dear deleting expert this bio research is a beneficial material for advancement and hope to future life saving efforts in the COVID-19 pandemic combating. Nannadeem (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The information about COVID 19 research seems to be news reporting and fail WP:NOTNEWS. This section will likely be be obsolete in a few months. Spike 'em (talk) 14:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Research & development at Dow University
Talk:William A. White

message: I uploaded the correct photo for William A. White this week.Abebenjoe 17:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New photograph

message: White may have been the only black chaplain in the Imperial Army in WWI, but he wasn't the only black officer. See here for instance. -- Necrothesp 12:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Only black officer
Talk:Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739)

message: Too much propaganda. This article has to be rewritten. (unsigned by anon)
:Please be more specific, or just go ahead and rewrite it. -Irpen 06:30, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
:One can but agree with anon. Let me be more specific about the propaganda!! This article has been joined with the article on the 1735-1739 Austria-Ottoman Wars and totally ignores the Austrian advances and then a series of defeats, just giving in a single sentence on a series of disastrous defeats. The defeats of the Austrian armies at Bucharest, Battle of Banja Luka (August 1737) and  further at Battle of Grocka (July 1739) and the retaking by Ottomans of Belgrade after a siege are totally missed.Noyder (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

message: I would like to see the source(s) for this "Ottoman victory" that the IP 85.103.29.87 has edit-warred into the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP 85.103.29.87's opinion of "Ottoman victory" 

message: Three journal articles used as sources do not appear in the journals listed. 
As seen   here. There is no article by Aksan, Virginia H. "The Ottoman Empire and the Russian Frontier, 1739-1742." The International History Review 11, no. 3 (1989): 481-502.
Instead:
*Women Shipyard Workers in the Second World War: A Note (pp. 478-485)
*Deborah Scott Hirshfield
*https://www.jstor.org/stable/40106045 
As seen        here or          here There is no article by Fisher, Alan W. "The Russo-Turkish War of 1735-1739 " The Slavonic and East European Review 37, no. 90 (1959): 321-339.
Instead:
*The Concept of the Poet in Pasternak (pp. 325-335)
*Victor Erlich
*https://www.jstor.org/stable/4205060 
As seen          here there is no article by Kafadar, Cemal. "The Ottoman Empire in the Eighteenth Century: Tradition and Change in a Muslim Society." The Journal of Asian Studies 41, no. 3 (1982): 561-583.
Instead:
*Early Southeast Asia: Old Wine in New Skins?--A Review Article (pp. 559-570)
*Early Southeast Asia: Essays in Archaeology, History and Historical Geography. by R. B. Smith, W. Watson
*Review by: Karl L. Hutterer
*https://doi.org/10.2307/2055253
*https://www.jstor.org/stable/2055253 
These sources;
*Ortaylı, İlber. The Ottoman Empire and the World Around It.
*Davies, Norman. Europe: A History.
*The Russian Empire and the Ottoman Empire, 1710-1922, by Alexander Shlyapnikov.
*The Russo-Turkish Wars of the Eighteenth Century, by Richard B. Spence.
*The Romanovs: 1613-1918, by Simon Sebag Montefiore.
contain no page numbers therefore fail WP:V. 
A clarification of said journal articles, page numbers for the books and quotes from all these sources will resolve this issue.--Kansas Bear (talk) 02:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources failing [[WP:V]] 

message: I amended the infobox per Template:Infobox_military_conflict#Parameters, which states results need to be either x victory or inconclusive. If the results do not fit into those parameters, the article should instead link to the aftermath in the text body.  Annwfwn (talk) 12:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox ''results''
Talk:Ottoman titles

message: What is the source? It looks just wrong. 
*It is: the 'three noble titles' are not excusively, nor even mainly, aristocratic, nor the only ones, nor by the way limited to the Ottoman empire See a better source I've added, notably also its pages for (the khevival dynasty's) Egypt [] and its bottom links Titles & Glossary Fastifex 09:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Just looking of the pages to Pasha, Bey and effendi we see a larger list of titles. These should be at the very least mention in this article. For exemple: khedive, viziers, Mushir, Lewa, Miralai and Kaimakam. 
Dryzen 17:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I happened to have landed on yhis page while reading about the Pashas. With only three titles presented I though it was a grosly under nourished article. I though it an interessting idea to enumerate the Ottoman titles and hierachy all in one place. It definitly does need work. From the history page it looks like a rather old page. Its amazing that so little was done with it. I beleive that this page should present as many titles in hierachy divided by sphere of influence: like Fastifex indicated (noble, military, court, judicial, administrative offices etc). Each title with a one to two line explenation for those with a self title page like Pasha while a slightly longer text for orphan titles like Lewa. I am though no expert on the subject and as I said was looking for these titles. Therefore my suggestions are from the point of view of a reader/researcher. Dryzen 19:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work by the way FastifexDryzen 19:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pashas, Bey, effendi &co 

message: I understand that that the titles moved around a bit and a Wali in one place might have  outranked a Khedive in another, but I am going to attempt a relative ranking. Please fix as you see necessary.
--iFaqeer (talk) 07:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relative Rank
Talk:The Complete U2

message: The original and upgrade prices are both discounted 66% (from 99 to 34 cents/song & 30 to 10 cents/song), but I can't source it.--99.129.166.4 (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On iTunes? I can't find it, but to get a URL to use as a source go to the album's page, right click the title and select "Copy URL" (or something to that effect; it's the only option). Then paste it in the article in between the <no wiki></nowiki> tags. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgrade