lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Netvibes

message: Cleaned up the article some and added references.  Since this article was created, I am satisfied regarding notability.  WP:RS was lacking and I have found a number of references which I have added.
"Your opinion regarding what you can find for references should not matter.  Just because you are ignorant/clueless on where this service is referenced, does not make it non-notable. When will hubris of the editors kill Wikipedia?  I hope it changes..."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.151.21.104 (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: I've been getting odd referrer spam from Russia linking to a Netvibes page. The referer is a page that contains no links to any of our pages, and the URL is a very odd one full of space characters. Not saying Netvibes is necessarily involved here, but it certainly seems odd, and it's not the first time people have seen this. GreenReaper (talk) 18:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referrer spam? 

message: This was an unusually strange revert. There was already a tag that was identical. We don't pile on identical tags. What could the editor possibly be thinking to reinsert the tag? Please give thought when you revert good edits by other editors. Especially, when using tools. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Netvibes&diff=924985660&oldid=924981711 And please self-revert. This revert made zero sense. --2604:2000:E010:1100:C0B3:C19:F51D:2CC (talk) 03:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There, I fixed it. Positive contributions are welcome, but spamming articles with the same redundant and arbitrary list of competing companies is disruptive. When you force other people to clean up your messes, don't be to surprised if they don't do a stellar job. Grayfell (talk) 03:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Careless editor reinsertion of tag ... that is already there
Talk:Island of Lost Souls (1932 film)

message: IMDB, as noted in the article, says this film was released in 1932. And so does Criterion, which released a DVD of this film in 2011.
So, I'm tempted to change the release date to 1932. Any objections?
And if I do make the change, what else do I need to change? I'm thinking there's a Wikipedia page on "Films released in 1932" page. What else? --Spiff666 (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Per a new 2022 source, Island of Lost Souls seems to have premiered in Chicago. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1932 or 1933? 

message: I've basically re-done the article in part of my attempts at cleaning articles on older genre films. It probably needs a copy-edit, but if anyone notices anything glaring or missing from previous edits, i'll be happy to address it here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write

message: Confusing - There was one each of Prendrick and Prendick in this article. When I checked The Island of Doctor Moreau there is Pendrick, Prendick and Prendrick and ditto via Google searches. So, just for consistency, I changed Prendrick in this article to Prendick after viewing this at Gutenberg. JennyOz (talk) 11:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling - Prendrick or Prendick
Talk:Syntropy (software)

message: How 'Edgy' is Syntropy?
To what extent is Syntropy accepted as a plausible theory by mainstream science?  Is it a subject of scientific debate, and is it gaining or losing currency and credibility? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Global46 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Quoting the definition in the article:
: "Whole Systems": "A tendency towards order and symmetrical combinations, designs of ever more : advantageous and orderly patterns. Evolutionary cooperation. Anti-entropy."[1]
The relation of syntropy as defined above and entropy as defined in physics is unclear. For one thing, a tendency of a system is definitely different in kind from a property of the state of a system, which is what entropy in physics is. The quoted definition is of a social sciences flavor rather than of the rigor of natural sciences. —Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.245.110.163 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syntropy — tendency versus a property of a state 

message: This page is just a breath above an advertisement, and not even well formed yet. I am going to certainly argue and make the point that a point of knowledge should be the main result when searching for the word "syntropy," not a programming tool. "Syntropy" is a well established concept in the literature of scientific knowledge and should not be trumped for a piece of software. I am adding this article to a disambiguation for syntropy and re-establishing the physics concept of syntropy as the main result of the keyterm.
--☯Lightbound☯ talk 03:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect Priority
Talk:James S. Brown

message: I edited this while my computer performed other tasks. The online house article lists a number of biographies of Brown, to which I have no access since Wisconsin, unlike Virginia, does not put its biographical encyclopedia online. I hope others with access to those materials can fill this out if warranted.Jweaver28 (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More work needed
Talk:Mount (grappling)

message: From the picture, it looks like the guy on the bottom has a wide open shot on the nuts of the guy who's on top.
   Attacking the testicles from such a position is a terrible idea.  First the pants of the attacker are bridged taut away from his crotch, since his legs are spread, and that gives a little protection.  Lowering one, or both, of your hands to his crotch would leave your face completely exposed.  Try focusing on maiming someone's testicles while he has his fingers in your eyes.  Because the target is right next to your body, and your arms have limited range of motion from the bottom of the mount, punching the testicles with any force what-so-ever would be next to impossible.  Also, going for the testicles is considered a 'dirty' move, so your opponent would likely respond by going for an equally 'dirty' target, and since your face is wide open in front of him, he'll probably just gauge out your eyes.  
In such a position you should never think about attacking.  You should be focused on defending your face, keeping your arms tucked in to avoid a keylock, possibly getting wrist control, and then bridging to bring the knee through to half-guard or rolling over to the top position.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.169.21 (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What about danger to the testicles?
Talk:Bụi đời

message: "Bui doi" in Vietnamese refers to any homeless children on the street. Accordingly, "di bui doi" means leave the family and go living with gangs...etc...The term for Vietnamese with mixed races is "con lai". how can I reclaim that misconception? (00:40, 17 June 2006 (edit) 88.108.123.44 (talk)
:Bụi Đời and Con Lai aren't same.--Amore Mio (talk) 12:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: con lai

message: Evidently the past move was a mistake, bụi đời should not be capitalised in Vietnamese. Also the title should be written in Vietnamese not whatever language(?) it is currently in. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: New York Times gives "bui doi," i.e. lower case, no diacritics. It's Vietnamese for "street children". You wouldn't write "Street Children." Kauffner (talk) 02:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, thanks for comment. Yes it clearly is bụi đời as per (i) Vietnamese sources, (ii) Peycam The Birth of Vietnamese Political Journalism 2012 "Often referred to as bụi đời [dust of life], they were described by the communist newspaper of the 1930s, La Lutte, as the “starving people from the countryside taking refuge in towns.” I imagine that capitalisations such as (iii) Lambert Beginning a Prayer Life Page 18 - 2009 "In Vietnam, children like me (Amerasians) were called Bụi Đời “dust of life” and we were hated and ostracized by Vietnamese society." may be influenced by the capitalisation in the "Bui Doi" number in Miss Saigon. However before doing anything hasty here there should be better sourcing, and address the possibly overweight Miss Saigon content of the article, then once the sourcing is more secure it can go to RM. Incidentally, that NY Times article is (a) sourced from Miss Saigon itself, (b) from 1991 when NYT MOS didn't even use French and Spanish accents as NYT does today, it's hardly "reliable for the statement being made" to show how a :category:Vietnamese words and phrases term such as "dust of life" is spelled. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:56, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bụi Đời or bụi đời?
Talk:Gulfstream III

message: This article was tagged by WikiProject Aircraft as needing to be brought up to snuff. If the old spec sheet should need to be replaced, it is below. thadius856talk 05:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old infobox 

message: Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.''
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support as nom. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support as nom. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: This article lists the C-20C as a "C-20B with upgraded and "hardened" secure communications, often utilized as backup aircraft accompanying the VC-25A aircraft when it is operating as Air Force One." The 89th Airlift Wing lists only C-20Bs in it's inventory, and if anyone were to have a backup aircraft accompanying Air Force One, it would be them, wouldn't it? How good is the info on the C-20C? TCav (talk) 01:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-20C Variant? 
Talk:Boeing C-22

message: The specifications (two different tables) didn't agree with each other in many respects.  Using two other sources on the web, I've attempted to correct the left-most table.  Why are there two specification tables anyway?  It's a bit confusing. Itsfullofstars 01:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, sorry for the confusion. The blue table is an old one that is no longer recommended for use by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft. The one on the left is the new format, which uses a template rather than a table. If you look [], you will see what the page looked like before. I haven't had time to update the specs, but the ones on the right are correct; the ones on the left are from the DC-9, where I got copied the template. Again, sorry for the confusion. Oh, rember to sign your posts on the talk page using 4 ~ 's. - BillCJ 01:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation.  Bad timing on my part.  I happened on the page while you were still working on it.  Sorry about the missing signature, by the way.  I'm new to this wiki editing stuff, but learning.
No problem. And we were all new here once. If you're not sure of anything, it's always best to ask first. - BillCJ 02:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Specifications

message: I am in two minds whether to propose a merge, as it seems that there is very little reason to have a separate article. All the relevant info could easily be in a section or just the variants section, particularly as they were virtually stock 727s with little modification.Discussion at Talk:Boeing 727#Merger proposalPetebutt (talk) 04:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article is mostly a verbatim copy of , and if not merged with Boeing 727 is likely to be proposed for deletion.!!Petebutt (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: All the more reason to merge it then.  —Compdude123 18:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impending delete proposal
Talk:Siemens Foundation

message: Shouldn't this page be renamed "Albert Hoser"? It a lot about him, very little about the foundation. Birdhurst 00:53, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:CDS Carrera 32 (TransMilenio)

message: The Spanish version of this article has different dates for the opening of the station (2000 and 2003).  Hence my question marks.--Fisherjs 01:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

message: As I read it, the intro correctly translates into an opening for the system and not the station. The station opening is addressed in the infobox and the History subhead. The SYSTEM was opened in 2000. If we need a clearer language, we should work on one. Hwonder talk 07:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you think about the insertion of the word "which," setting apart that it was the system and not the station that was opened. The station opening in the infobox refers to when service started at that platform. Hwonder talk 16:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that adds clarity.--Fisherjs 13:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think it's correct as is
Talk:Astute-class submarine

message: I noticed there was a recent attempt to add mention of a new  to the infobox, but it was reverted as "cite isn't sufficient". But there seems to be other sources as well,https://www.matchtech.com/job/EMP451390/sda-project-manager-barrowinfurness-englandhttps://www.navylookout.com/tag/ssnr/http://www.hisutton.com/Royal_Navy_Submarine_SSN-R.htmlhttps://www.forbes.com/sites/hisutton/2019/12/08/new-intelligence-on-the-secretive-next-generation-british-attack-submarine-ssnr/amp/https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/maritime-antisub/6062-its-never-too-early-to-start-planning-for-the-future/amp perhaps enough to add mention of  somewhere in the arricle? Thoughts? - wolf 05:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good finds.  I've only looked at navylookout and Forbes as I recognise those, but they look good to me. Mark83 (talk) 06:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  SSN(R) 

message: In the Propulsion and general specifications section, final paragraph, a submariner is quoted speaking about "holding a [mock enemy] submarine" in sea exercises, in reference to the quality of the Astute class's sonar. Could this be clarified please? Does it refer to tracking another submarine? If so, perhaps there could also be some discussion about the issues of tracking another sub using sonar; for example how the sub doing the tracking avoids detection by the tracked sub, or if it does give away its own position what are the ramifications of this for submarine-on-submarine warfare? 2A01:4C8:1485:5869:B8B0:55B3:CBF1:6660 (talk) 13:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification required
Talk:Future Integrated Soldier Technology

message: The intro describes the programme as "Future Integrated Soldier Technology", while a note at the bottom of the article states that it is sometimes incorrectly described as "Future Infantry Soldier Technology".  For this reason I suggest moving the article to the title used in the introduction.  MartinMcCann 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. See theInfantry FIST site to confirm official meaning of the acronym. 81.179.145.204 18:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Future Integrated Soldier Technology"? 
Talk:Panther (Command and Liaison Vehicle)

message: Most of the text of this article had been copied and pasted from here. In accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations, the incriminating material has been removed. Raoulduke47 21:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: copyvio

message: I think the Panther is a variant of the Iveco LMV, and should be a part of that article? What do others think?
Tmaull 14:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There's no sense in having the basically same vehicule on WP twice. Info about Panther belongs in the Iveco LMV article. --Whale plane 16:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Joint Combat Aircraft

message: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2130612/Cameron-makes-humiliating-u-turn-future-Britains-aircraft-carriers.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
So do we list this here, or just hammer on the Cameron and Tory party pages until his is forced to resign? Hcobb (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Same stuff again. And while I won't condemn you for this post, Wikipedia authors high and mighty would as this is not a forum page. Alas, that's their dogmatic mindset.Phd8511 (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameron in humiliating u-turn on future of Britain's aircraft carriers with return of jump jet 

message: http://www.avionics-intelligence.com/news/2012/12/12/royal-navy-training-begins-on-new-f-35-fighter-jet.html
They have joined the US Marines Fighter Attack Training Squadron, VMFAT-501, initially to complete F-35B flight training, which will take approximately 6 weeks. Following this they will become Instructor Pilots (IPs) on VMFAT-501, where they will train future USMC pilots to fly the aircraft.
After gaining valuable experience on the aircraft Lt Cdr Tidball and Sqn Ldr Buchler will move to Edwards AFB, California where they will form part of a UK Test and Evaluation Squadron tasked with conducting operational tests on the new stealth fighter. 
:So how long will they be training USMC before moving on to the Test and Evaluation Squadron? Hcobb (talk) 12:30, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidball and Buchler 

message: It's noted that Marham is to recieve its first F-35 Joint Shite Fighters in 2015... welcome to 2016 and an F-35 Joint Money Pit hasn't flown in this country, and as far as I know, hasn't left America.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.110.223 (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marham 
Talk:BAE Systems Replica

message: Any evidence this project ever existed? Dan100 (Talk) 18:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Olympic-medalist-stub

message: I have changed the image in this stub to a free image, per WP Fair Use Policy (#9).  In place of the Olympic rings, I put an Olive branch.  I would ultimately like to get an image of an Olive crown, but I was unable to find one.  Does anyone know where we might find one?  tiZom(2¢) 01:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair Use Image
Talk:Actinomyces

message: --Dnissley 01:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Following the link “The Sweet Smell of Rain” one reads that the typical smell of wet soil is caused by ‘actinomycetes’. This term is not synonymous with the name of the genus Actinomyces! If you search for the lemma “Actinomycetes” you will be redirected to “Actinomycetales”. This order of bacteria contains some families and a lot of genera including the genus Streptomyces with numerous species. Regarding the physiology and typical habitats of the members of the genus Actinomyces, it seems to me very unlikely that Actinomyces species are the producers of that smell. It seems much more likely that members of the genus Streptomyces cause this typical smell. -- Brudersohn (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smell of soil from Actinomyces? 

message: To my opinion the link to “The Role of Actinomycetes in Coffee Plantation Ecology” doesn't fit to this article Actinomyces. From the text of this link it is clear that it deals with organisms of the order Actinomycetales, mainly of the genus Streptomyces, and that the genus Actinomyces plays no or only a minor role if at all. This also shows that sometimes there is a confusion with the terms Actinomycetes as a not exactly defined colloquial term and Actinomyces as a term for a taxinomical genus. -- Brudersohn (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actinomyces in coffee plantations? 

message: A whole bunch of info was added to Actinomyces naeslundii which pertains to the whole genus. I've removed it from the species article and placed it here with the hope that someone can merge it into this article.
 
Hope someone can help. Thanks!Ajpolino (talk) 05:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info from [[Actinomyces naeslundii]]
Talk:Stichting INGKA Foundation

message: This claim is too controversial to leave uncited:
In practice, however, its purpose is largely corporate tax-avoidance and anti-takeover protection for IKEA. --AndersFeder 01:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The economist article is rather scathing appears to imply most of that however I did not re-add it as I feel it needs to be reworded as it's just an opinion (even if one that's very likely to be true) Nil Einne 18:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I corrected that. See also IKEA.--Patrick (talk) 09:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

message: IKEA is Swedish only in its colors. It's a Dutch-based corporation controlled by a Dutch-registered charity.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TippTopp (talk • contribs) 04:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Swedish, but a Dutch Corporation 

message: Do we have any idea where the pennies-on-the-dollar this group gies away go? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 06:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Where Does the Money Go?

message: Kamprad, now 80+, has resigned as chairman, leaving the chair to his eldest son. Kamprad is also moving back to Sweden from Switzerland.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franke 1 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingvar no longer chairman
Talk:Fighting Antisemitism Together

message: This article was listed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FAST_-_Fighting_Antisemitism_Together on 9 June 2006. The result of the debate at 23:28, 16 June 2006 was KEEP (no consensus). TruthbringerToronto 01:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article survived AfD
Talk:Anthony Dimond

message: We do not need to put Tony in the lead of the name. The article itself maybe should be renamed to Tony Diamond, but either way we should just have Anthony Joseph Dimond in the lead. This is exactly what the Wikipedia Manual of Style tells us to do. The example they give is that will the article on Bill Gates it opens by saying "William Henry Gates III" and proceeds from there. It clearly says do not put "Bill" there in the opening. It says this applies to all very common nicknames. So Bill for Williams, Bob for Robert, Tony for Anthony and many more. Tony is a super, super common nickname for Anthony and we have no reason to explain that he was sometimes, or almost in all cases called Tony, in the giving of his full name. We only have to an uncommon nickname, so if he was called Ant, or Chad, or Skip, or Chip, or even one that is common but makes no connection to his name like Jack, Bob or Bill, we would include it, but you do not need to include Tony for Anthony, Matt for Matthew, Mike for Michael or any other super common pairing. As I said, this article maybe should be renamed to Tony Dimond per the common name guidelines, but that is totally sperate from how we should word the giving of his full name, which should not have "Tony" at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  We do not need to put "Tony" in the lead of name