lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:WikiProject England

message: Something is wrong with this box.  It is stuck in the middle of the page and eats text below it.  See Talk:East Anglia for an example. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 19:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it is fixed now.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken box 

message: Just thought I would mention that the importance categories such as High-importance WikiProject England articles do not exist (yet).  MortimerCat 22:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories do not exist 

message: I've changed the flag to Modified_Flag_for_WikiProject_England.bmp.jpg, which is used on the members banner, as the original image wasn't showing up.--Cenwulf 08:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the flag 

message: On the sandbox is a new version of this template using the  template. Would there be any objections to implementing this? Martin 23:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--Aervanath (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Please change:
|QUALITY_SCALE         = yes
 |class=
to
|QUALITY_SCALE         = yes
 |class=
 |FULL_QUALITY_SCALE   = yes
 |AUTO_ASSESS          = yes
  |auto=
|IMPORTANCE_SCALE      = yes
 |importance=
|attention=
 |ATTENTION_CAT        = England-related articles needing attention
|infobox=
 |INFOBOX_CAT          = England-related articles needing infoboxes
|note 1=
 |NOTE_1_TEXT          = This page has been marked as needing a picture.
 |NOTE_1_IMAGE         = Image-request.svg
  |NOTE_1_SIZE         = 17px
 |NOTE_1_CAT           = England-related articles needing images
|MAIN_CAT              = WikiProject England pages
I can add documentation for these extra fields and additional assessments if someone reminds me, after the change. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 21:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you just confirm ... are you making this request on behalf of the WikiProject? Has there been any discussion about whether the full quality scale, etc. is needed or desired? Thanks, — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been discussed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_England#Importance. MRSC (talk) 11:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Keith D (talk) 10:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many missing features 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:England. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Magioladitis (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Template:England" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Template:WPENG has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 06:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Template:WPENG]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:South Side High School (Rockville Centre, New York)

message: This article is desparately in need of some editing. I strongly suggest people editing this to read: Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools#Sources for school articles. The bits and pieces that are filled with either subjective bits and pieces or plainly nothing at all should be removed, and what's left should be rewritten... --JoanneB 19:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:International School of Stavanger

message: I'm guessing someone from the school will eventually see the notice and remove it. Will they even check the talk page? I don't think so. Let alone make the article a little less unbiased, with all the goings on about how great it is. 
I have no problems with the facts in it, only the way in which it is written, which does not at all amount to what I expect of a good wikipedia article. A History section (without five pages of b$ about successful people who went there) might take away from the boastfulness of this page... 85.166.130.249 19:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey. This page is made by people from the school. I think they should be allowed to express their opinions on the matter! If it's a crappy school (which it is), they might as well say so. 85.166.160.209 19:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.isstavanger.no/about/profile.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  X96lee15 (talk) 00:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rock Street Journal

message: For a page that cites sources, and at the risk of sounding pompous, pretty well-written!! That definitely needs reconsidering..
As for the accusation that the article was written by the website owner, that's absolutely false. The article was created by me, and you can look on my userpage to see more of my contributions. I have no connection with RSJ, although I don't know how it's possible to prove it, or disprove it for that matter. I agree that the DYK hook on the main page looks like a promotion for the website, but I voiced the concern while nominating the article for DYK..  The admin(s) who put it on the main page didn't think that was too important.. And the reason may be that RSJ is genuinely involved in promoting rock music in India, and this database is a part of that initiative. Hope this justifies keeping the article on WP. -- Longhairandabeard 02:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the CSD; probably just vandalism. --Parker007 02:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you could explain what makes you so certain this is advertisement? -- Longhairandabeard 05:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion!!!! 

message: 42,000? that's just a claim. joseph 22:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, so it says in the article.. I couldn't find any other, more reliable sources for it. -- Longhairandabeard 05:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i've got very reliable sources, but i doubt that it's verifiable... somewhere in the region of 3,000. yes. that's three and three zeroes. joseph 06:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! That's a big difference. What are the sources? We could find a way to include them in the article. Btw, there should be some kind of agency doing circulation estimates for Indian magazines. Do you know of any? -- Longhairandabeard 07:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the source is from within (entirely off the record, though). but as i remember, even their own company profile didn't claim as much, in 2000-01 when circulation was at its peak. i'll look it up. joseph 07:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.. We'll have to find something more solid than that. Perhaps you can lay your hands on the company profile. Btw, found this but no mention of RSJ. -- Longhairandabeard 08:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: just found the profile, and i was wrong.. it says 42,000. that's the same figure... i was thinking of the figures for delhi alone... somewhere around 8000. i guess we'll just have to wait for "we're number one" war to break out with rave, to get the actual figures... sorry about that. i could check with  "the source" but would be an unnecessary, long-drawn-out process. joseph 14:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  circulation?
Talk:BA

message: Why is bachelor of arts so far down the list? isn't that the most frequently encountered meaning of "B.A."? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PalaceGuard008 (talk • contribs) 06:03, May 29, 2007
:Maybe. That's what I came here looking for.  In any event, since I can't "place the items in order of usage," as the Manual of Style recommends, I just alphabetized the entries, which were in no detectable order. By lucky coincidence, Bachelor of Arts is now second from the top. --zenohockey 00:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the ease and prevalence of use of :BA, Special:Whatlinkshere/BA should be regularly inspected for links that can be redirected to more appropriate targets, 90% of which appear to be Bachelor of Arts. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bachelor of Arts 

message: The term BA as beauty advisor seems to be used in South East Asia, and they don't bother explaining it, thinking that the abbreviation is universally known (similar to their 'CM' for TV commercials). It took some time for me to decypher it, and I just wanted to share finding. Hellerick (talk) 08:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks. To be listed on a disambiguation page, your observation would need to be appropriately recorded at the relevant article, in accordance with MOS:DABABBREV. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beauty Advisor
Talk:Ned Hanlan

message: I have added an external link to the biography of Ned Hanlan from The Canadian Encyclopedia. I hope this meets with the editors' approval.Treemill2 (talk) 06:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: In this series of edits, content was introduced to this article taken from the ODNB. While checking to make sure it had all been overwritten, I discovered that the bulk of this article is duplicated from the Dictionary of Canadian Biography. This content was introduced in June 2009. Unless we can verify license, the material will need to be rewritten. The article can alternatively be restored to an earlier state. Hopefully this one was free of copyrighted content. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=6764. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Sunrise (disambiguation)

message: I originally created Sunrise Mall (disambiguation) because many articles referring to the now-Westfield owned Long Island Sunrise Mall or either of the two Texas Sunrise Malls incorrectly linked to the California one. Unfortunately, shortly after I created it some time ago, an inane anon possibly connected to a registered user(see below)ill-advisedly -tagged it as "unnecessary" and equally ill-advisedly sugessted meging it into the existing Sunrise Mall article. While both I reverted the article in time and there have been no attempts to delete it since, I did discover it on a registered user's "articles to delete" sub-page. Thus, I merged the Sunrise mall disambig article into this, because not only is the California one not the only Sunrise Mall around, but it shouldn't have to be confused with the other three that currently lack articles... Ranma9617 05:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why [[Sunrise Mall (disambiguation)]] was merged into this...
Talk:Paulo Branco

message: I don't normally edit Wikipedia so I don't really know what the protocol is for this, but this article is a mess. Most of it is unsourced contributions from one user, with no other contributions, in a single 48 minute timespan in February 2014, and has been awaiting citation ever since. 
If I'm understanding the page on verifiability correctly, uncited material can be removed, but it's discouraged unless the contributor has reason to believe the material in question can not be verified, and since, in this case, it would constitute deleting everything on the page that's not from IMDb, I don't want to leap to that.
I'm hesitant to say conclusively that, for instance, the fact that Branco "started his career as a producer in 1979 between Paris and Lisbon" simply can not be verified, but that, and the entire body of biographical information, seems to be an excuse to lace in vague, aggrandizing statements about how he "produced over 300 films" and his company "extends (his) commitment for independent cinema with directors he’s been supporting for a long time" or how he's "always taking on new challenges." Am I here to get information about this guy, or date him?
After some searching, a lot of the phrasing is startlingly similar to Branco's biography from the Dublin International Film Festival in 2014 (https://www.diff.ie/festival/film/producing_with_paulo_branco) but I don't think that constitutes a "reliable, third-party, published source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."
I tried to find some verifiable information on Branco, so, if I was going to delete it, I could at least replace the text with something more substantive, but all I can find from reliable sources is articles about his legal battle with Terry Gilliam, and to replace his entire biography with that just seems a bit cruel.
All the same, that's the last of the effort I'm personally willing to expend on Paulo Branco, ever again, for the rest of my entire life. Good luck and best wishes, Wikipedia. May whoever follows me be made of sterner stuff.
- J  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:4080:5F9A:6D8A:C74A:9B28:FCC5 (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: sure the article is insufficiently sourced and probably has other issues, but in 10 minutes I found and added 3 references for his early professional career that anonymous "J" complains about above, so this article should be improved, not deleted --Kai Carver (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced Contributions 

message: This sure is a puff piece. See the article on The Man Who Killed Don Quixote for reports of his unprofessional behavior while producing that film. The quotation used as a subject line comes from the unit production manager at the time Branco was producing the film.
WindSandAndStars (talk) 02:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The behavior of a tyrant and a bully"
Talk:Bones (disambiguation)

message: This page should probably be folded into the Bone_(disambiguation) page -- the dab guidelines suggest that variations in singular vs. plural words ought to be on the same dab. jonofiddle (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fold to singular

message: I reviewed all of the pages that link to Bones.  A few pages needed to be changed from Bones to Bones.  I have made these changes.  Most of the pages needed to be changed from Bones to Bones (TV series).  I have also made these changes.  Since most Bones were trying to link to Bones (TV series), I am changing the Bones redirect to Bones (TV series). Mr.Atoz (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted this article to a previous version of its contents -- as a redirect to Bones (disambiguation). While when you reviewed the article in November most of the links to "Bones were trying to link to Bones (TV series)", that does not necessarily imply that this should have then been made into a redirect to that article. The appropriate guideline to follow is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Reviewing the history of this page (and its deleted version), it has been back and forth repeatedly between the TV show and the singular Bone more than once. This alone makes me hesitant to believe that there really is a single primary topic. Regardless, for now I have removed all article space links to this page and directed them to the appropriate target. I believe this to be a case where there is a conflict between primary usage of the term (TV) and the primary long-term significance of the term (anatomy), and so any decision on the primary topic should be determined by a consensus of more than a single editor. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am OK with the Bones redirect to Bones (disambiguation).  Mr.Atoz (talk) 17:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bones Redirect to Bones (TV series) vs. Bone

message: I did not know the policy about not including multiple blue links in disambiguation pages. Thanks for letting me know. I found the policy here: WP:DABSTYLE. However, I see it violated all the time, so it was easy to think that I had been following policy. Example: Bushwhackers (disambiguation), Red Rock, and Red Wolf (disambiguation) for example. Thanks, I will fix my others. dawnleelynn(talk) 22:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple Blue Links in Disambiguation 

message: The old redir was going to "bone", while separate db pages existed for "bone" and for "bones"
I have redir'd to the correct db page so that anyone typing "bones" in the search will not end up on the "bone" article. Chaosdruid (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That was WP:MALPLACED. Please submit a new WP:Requested move to reverse the outcome of the previous RM (see above). – wbm1058 (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I searched for "Bones"
Talk:List of The West Wing deaths

message: I don't care if it's for recurring and starring characters, I thought we didn't want this page open ended, though.  The reference proves notability of that death.  The "sad parallel" was part of the ref, but whatever. - Peregrine Fisher 19:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies that I accidentally deleted the entire lead instead of just the "recurring and starring" bit. I re-added the lead without the "recurring and starring characters" comment because, as I've noted on the deletion discussion, most of these characters are completely non-notable. Also, what is POV is to call it a "sad" parallel. The reason I removed the comment altogether as opposed to simply removing the word "sad" is that I feel that the parallel to Spencer's actual death is a side comment that belongs on the Leo McGarry page and not here. Still, an argument can be made for keeping it and so if you wish to add it back (minus the word "sad"), I won't object. I hope this explains my edits. --Hnsampat 19:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's cool.  Thanks for the explanation. - Peregrine Fisher 20:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I am the original author.  I don't believe that lists are inherently valueless, but I am not going to pursue fighting for retention of this article if there is overwhelming support for its deletion.  BTW I know very little about the death of Leo McGarry (the seventh season is currently screening in Australia), so please refrain for providing details, at  least until April Kransky 09:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede and reference
Talk:GrandFisher

message: sorry bro, the grandfisher was in about 2 episodes...he's pointless and dead. i think we know more about the 1st squad vc than this guy and thats pretty bad. i'd take the time to fix this article giving it headings etc but it probably won't be here long. --Grimjaw 19:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This article has absolutely no more potential. Its not going to have much more information than is already present. Hell we don't even know anything about his zanpakutō. At least we know what 1st lieutenant's shikai looks like. Gdo01 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)