Talk:Zora

message: The general ideas on this page are fine, but the actual writing is horrible.  Too much of the text is written in the present tense rather than the past tense, which would be more appropriate for an encyclopedic article such as this.  
Too often, the article gets caught up in minor details of the games which are irrelevant, such as blow-by-blow accounts of what a character does in the game that s/he is featured in.  
The "Evolution" section, I feel, gives a bit too much creedence to that particular theory, and gives the impression that it is by and large the accepted reality for most fans.  It should be rewritten in a way that presents the idea as what it is: a theory.  
Robotpoop 20:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This Entire Section Needs to be Rewritten

message: Should this be merged with the new The Legend of Zelda series characters page, or do you think the Zoras are important enough to have their own page? I'm undecided. I've already moved the Gorons, but then again they appear in only a few games compared to the Zoras. Master Thief Garrett 22:08, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge this with The Legend of Zelda series races. (It looks like you were probably going to do that anyway.) You can probably drop the Evolution section, since that's already addressed in the other article. Aerion//talk 21:38, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why wasn't this ever done? I also vote to merge with The Legend of Zelda series races, like Aerion. If this isn't done soon I might be WP:BOLD. --Tryforceful 06:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: I was under the impression Japas was the band's bassist. Perhaps I'll have to play MM again. - 211.28.142.247 04:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Japas is the band's second guitarist?

message: I have always wondered whether Mikau and Lulu had any sort of relationship, and by that I mean something more than a friendship.  I was once told that Lulu's children were Mikau's as well, but the game itself doesn't give any sort of evidence.  Any thoughts?
:Seems suggested by the game, but it was never stated so we can't say anything. --Tryforceful 04:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mikau and Lulu 

message: I appreciate your edit to Sakina bint Hussain - neutrality was significantly improved, good work! T. J. Day 00:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sakina bint Hussain

message: I changed the fanon names "Sea Zora" and "River Zora" into "Friendly Zora" and "Hostile Zora". I copied the Oracle series part into the Friendly Zora bit too, since it also concerns them. I then split the section into two, the part that reffers to the friendly zora, and the part that reffers to the hostile, and moving them accordingly - Saimdusan4:13 PM 7 June 2006
:"Sea Zora" and "River Zora" are technically NOT fanon because they appear in the series. Taken directly from Oracle of Ages as an example:
 Don't think us noble sea Zoras the same as those savage, vulgar river Zoras!
 
 You're in the wrong place if you want to complain about being attacked by a river Zora. 
:They are thus the official delineations which NoA has chosen to represent the distinction between hostile and friendly Zoras as the series has evolved. I'm changing these back, even though this article needs much more work than that... where did the River Zora information even go?
:--Tryforceful 04:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fanon names - why are we using them?

message: My point was not that if the Mu'tazili position regarding hadith is mentioned then the QA position should follow. Due to the historical impact the Mu'tazilah have had they are much more worthy of mention than the QA. Per wp:undue, the QAers simply do not warrant mention as they numbers are negligible. The Mu'tazili page has a section on their position regarding hadith, although I think it is unreferenced. Supertouch (talk) 20:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hadith

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. @User:GeographieMan: No need for a RM discussion in cases like this. You can ask for quick assistance at WP:RMTR. (closed by non-admin page mover) —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 15:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Zora (razločitev) →  – Unintentionally moved; please revert everything since I can't. — GeographieMan[~MSG~] 14:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 July 2023