lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Juneau International Airport

message: * The history section mentions only one minute aspect of the airport's history, rather than serving as a proper history.  I realize that perhaps the best sources for this likely aren't on the web.  For instance, I believe the book about Kendler's Dairy mentions the earliest days of the airport.  OTOH, while Alaska Coastal Airlines deals mostly with the actual airplanes involved, the portion of the history section of that article not dealing with the airplanes appears to be amply sourced.  That tells me that there should be something out there on the web.
* The "Location and controversy" section is full of environmentalist-leaning POV.  To highlight the worst example: The original airstrip was built in the 1930s, and no environmental impact analysis was performed at that time.  The uninitiated perhaps may not realize that this was about 35 years before the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act, and therefore no environmental impact analysis was performed because none was required.  As an expansive dairy farming area, the site perhaps offered the best available land with the least expense in developing it.
* Surely there were other accidents and/or incidents besides Alaska Airlines Flight 1866.  Even though that article isn't very well-sourced WRT the actual crash, I responded to the "citation needed" tag with "you must be kidding me."  In response, I'd better go tag a bunch of articles which state that Barack Obama is the president of the United States, but aren't sourced.  Just joking, I think.RadioKAOS (talk) 12:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues 
Talk:Douglas Island

message: Shouldn't it be called a tidal island since the flats between Douglas Island and the mainland are exposed at low tide?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkalunatic (talk • contribs) 09:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is clearly a tidal island and I've made the relevant change. I also added the relevant category. AlaskaMike (talk) 14:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really an island? 

message: Content
Overall, the article provides great and relevant information, but to a minimal amount. For example, the section title "Geography" provides great insight about the location and scenery of the Douglas Island area, but the "History" section and the article's heading provide minimal insight to their designated topics. Also, the "Politics" section of the article, in my opinion, provides no real purpose for the article as a whole, as it primarily lists politicians that lived in the Douglas Island area.
Neutrality
Overall, the article does a great job staying neutral and there appears to be no personal insight within the article.
Citations
Overall, the article only has a few references listed, but these references are cited within the article. In the "History" section, there appears to be no in-text citations for any of the claims made within it. In regards to the listed references, two out of three sources are no longer found on the internet. The only reference that is still obtainable on the internet, though, comes from a reliable source.
Equity Gaps
In my opinion, the article does cover a historically underrepresented subject, as it covers one of Juneau's most historic and influential areas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kslaguidao (talk • contribs) 07:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation - Douglas Island 

message: Bibliography
This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment.
Choate, Glenda, and Gary H. Gillette. Douglas Townsite Historic Building Survey. City and Borough of Juneau, 1989. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat02580a&AN=ala.258246&site=eds-live&scope=site.
“Douglas Indian Village Fire of 1962 - Douglas Indian Association.” DIATaku, Douglas Indian Association Tribal Government, 10 Sept. 2019, diataku.com/douglas-indian-village-fire-of-1962/.
Redman, Earl. The Juneau Gold Belt: A History of the Mines and Miners. Gastineau Channel Historical Society Operators of the Last Chance Mining Museum, 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kslaguidao (talk • contribs) 07:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography - Douglas Island
Talk:Sullivan's Travels

message: The hit movie that Sullivan would rather forget is "Ants in Your Plants of 1939," not "Ants in Your Pants..." (Someone keeps editing my correction to the article.) Anyone who believes otherwise should watch the office scene with Sullivan and the studio executives to verify this. Also refer to the Michael McKean commentary from the Criterion DVD in which he cites the difference between pants and plants; he praises Preston Sturges sense of humor. "Ants in Your Pants" would simply repeat a common phrase, while "Ants in Your Plants" is an example of Sturges' wordplay. Sullivan (Joel McCrea) later refers to "Ants in Your Plants of 1939" when tries to determine the Girl's (Veronica Lake) familiarity with movies that he directed.
:Keep your pants/plants on! That was me. I watched it again and you were right. Clarityfiend 00:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Had to correct this again. Philip Cross (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Ants in Your Plants of 1939''

message: Sullivan's Travels was also used in a Woody Allen movie. It might be Hannan And Her Sisters, but I am not certain.  Allen used was the 'watching the funny movie in the church' scene.
70.184.75.48 18:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The film Allen's character sees in Hannah and Her Sisters is Duck Soup. Online critics compare the ending of Hannah and the opening of Stardust Memories with Sullivan's Travels, but the opening of Stardust is more obviously a parody of the dream sequence which begins Fellini's 8½. Philip Cross (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in a Woody Allen movie

message: I considered altering the word in the article as it is misleading; the Veronica Lake character is probably meant to be in her early twenties. I decided not to, as the word more accurately reflects the innocence the character displays most of the time, but I inserted "The Girl" in the first reference to Lake to clarify the legitimacy of its use here. I know this is being pedantically PC. Philip Cross (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Girl" versus "woman"

message: ? 62.49.133.183 (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @62.49.133.183 should say 'why is it not linked ?' 62.49.133.183 (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is "o brother where art thou" linked at all?
Talk:Top Hat

message: As far as I am aware, the lyrics to Irving Berlin's "Top Hat, White Tie and Tails" are under copyright, either to the Berlin Estate or their assignees. Saving objection I propose to remove them from the article. Dermot 18:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The gross revenue is listed as $1,782,000.  This is the gross domestic revenue.  The film also made $1,420,000 in foreign revenue, for a total gross of $3,202,000, and a profit of $1,325,000.  Perhaps the overall gross should be listed to give the correct impression that this was one of the biggest hits of 1935.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.131.95 (talk) 04:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gross Revenue

message: although the gondolas and canals are supposed to be some kind of fantasy equivalent of Venice, the only lines in the script just refer to it as "Italy."
billybob  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.199.168 (talk) 04:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Characters mention several times that they are going to the Lido. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venice_Lido 45.46.206.14 (talk) 00:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Venice

message: The most startling thing about the screenplay is the characters' assumption that Fred Astaire's and Edward Everett Horton's characters are engaged in an affair! How this got past the Hayes Office is hard to understand. Why it is not discussed in this article is even harder to understand. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: homosexuality

message: Are there sources out there for the DVD releases. It seems like a small thing to be missing n an otherwise Good article. AIRcorn (talk) 02:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD release 
Talk:Swing Time (film)

message: The film and evidently much of the music released with it is almost 77 years old, but the film's copyright status needs clarification. Specifically, whether the copyright has lapsed or not (presumably not). -Mardus (talk) 11:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status? 

message: This part of the movie with its blackface is racist, period. It was racist but "acceptable" (a concept I cannot understand) as an homage to Robinson and at the same time minstrel shows, again something rooted in racism, for 1936 white audiences.  This needs to be brought up, and the foundation can be anything from Wikipedia's article on misnstrel shows to outside reviews and journal articles.  Its been examined, but tjose criticisms are glossed over. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mqr/2018/01/fred-astaire-and-the-blackface-talking/ 73.39.221.189 (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Any discussion in the article about the underlying (unconscious) racism of the Bojangles number must be "rooted" in reliable sources.  I'm certain they're out there, so I suggest you find some and use them to construct a new "Controversy" section of the article.  Any such section should also include Astaire's great respect for Bill Robinson, and should make clear the differences between current societal attitudes and those of the period. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bojangles number
Talk:List of mayors of Juneau, Alaska

message: Since I couldn't stay awake today long enough to get real work done, I instead tried reading various things.  I found various issues of the Alaska Local Government newsletter published during the 1960s by the Office of the Governor, which handled local government affairs in the executive branch prior to the 1972 establishment of the Alaska Department of Community and Regional Affairs (which in turn is a division-level unit of the present-day Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development).  It's actually pretty safe to say that the borough only had the two mayors.  A 1964 issue of the aforementioned newsletter polled the new boroughs about their structure and progress, with GJB reporting that the mayor had a four-year term of office.  An early 1970 issue contained a directory of officials, which listed Charney as mayor (or chairman, as they called borough mayors in Alaska back then for who-the-fuck-knows whatever reason).  The publication issued about a year afterward listed the unified municipality, with Joe McLean as mayor. RadioKAOS  –  Talk to me, Billy  01:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Borough mayors complete?
Talk:Alene Duerk

message: Bio in PDF at:
https://navymedicine.med.navy.mil/Files/Media/ecm/sitedata/93E9008D-802E-D019-ABBA0925B2764081/library/DuerkBio.PDF
If someone gets the chance to transcribe/OCR that would be great. I'll see if I get the chance soon. Jinian 13:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Unlike other biographies of military people I’ve seen here, this article doesn’t mention any of her promotions until she reaches Capt and then Admiral. With her recent passing and her notariety as a “first”, this article definitely needs work. If anyone can find the source info, I’d be happy to update this article. TadgStirkland401 (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank Progression and Assignments 

message: There are categories listed for her being :Category:American naval personnel of the Korean War, :Category:American naval personnel of the Vietnam War and :Category:American female military personnel of the Vietnam War, but no mention in this article of her participation in either conflict. Should those categories be removed, or does someone have resources that state she took part in those? If I don't hear back from anyone within about a week, I'll remove those categories. TadgStirkland401 (talk) 20:27, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories for Korean War and Vietnam War

message: Although Duerk served in the Navy during the Korean War era, there are no reliable sources found as of yet state that she was in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in the Korean War. Accordingly, "Category:United States navy personnel of the Korean War" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean War service
Talk:Zayin

message: sorry for the edit conflict there, Sputnik, I thought I was in conflict with myself :) dab (ᛏ) 13:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title added

message: A citation is needed to Colless's work for verification. Michael Sheflin (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard it's some kind of a euphemistic abbreviation of זרג (zereg). Cf. also khĕr (the OCS name of the letter Х) becoming a euphemism for khuy, as well as effing for fucking. Determinant666 (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colless citation 

message: The editor who put this in forgot to actually mention what's most important here. Nu, *what is  its meaning as noun?*
By now, the quoted source is a *dead link*. Arminden (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What IS its meaning as noun?
Talk:Mediator

message: I think the article will not deserve the merging after my additions --Melaen 13:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: While Jesus is widely known as the divine mediator, it would be interesting to inquire on why some have also attributed the title to Enoch, who is sometimes called the Son of Man.  ADM (talk) 18:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Divine mediator
Talk:Oklahoma Baptist University

message: PreacherboyMN and one or more unregistered editors are protesting the language used in this article - language that is very similar to that used in many other articles - to describe the institution's exemption to Title IX. In particular, they object to describing this exemption as discrimination against LGBTQ people. However, the cited source makes it very clear that this is an accurate description: "Title IX of the Education Act protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal funding. The law provides an exemption for schools controlled by religious organizations that hold conflicting beliefs."
I acknowledge that those who discriminate against LGBTQ people sometimes like to use religion to excuse their actions and beliefs, including the administrators of this institution, but that doesn't in any way mean that it's not discrimination. WP:NPOV demands that we accurately describe this in the article, in line with reliable sources. ElKevbo (talk) 15:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV language about the institution's Title IX exemption
Talk:Charlotte, Princess Royal

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Indeed, it was the wrong picture.
Excuse my presumption, but since I had the book, a scanner, and a little time? I edited in one that is, most definitely, of Charlotte, Princess Royal. (Painted before her marriage). 
I could use some advice on the copyright issues and how it's done through Wiki. But this scan, which I took from Flora Fraser's book on the daughters of George III. In the details of the image, I included the name of the artist, in what collection the picture is located, correct title, blah blah. 
But yes!
I'm satisfied. :-) I have others from when she was married, but this one shows her in her status as Princess Royal, so I think it suits. She looks a lot like her father in this picture.
This image is fine, but Flora Fraser's book also has a more flattering picture of a younger Royal-- the painting of her and her two sisters Augusta and Elizabeth by Gainsborough, commissioned by her brother George, Prince of Wales. Might a crop from this painting be a better image for the article, or could the whole painting it be included somewhere?18.173.1.125 (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The new picture.  

message: The redirect Augusta Matilda Charlotte has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Augusta Matilda Charlotte]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:June 15th North–South Joint Declaration

message: This article is ridiculous.  Anyone want to make it sound a bit less like a KCNA press release?
--65.102.4.143 05:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hear hear. "The Korean people’s reunification zeal heightened"... 86.132.142.14 03:42, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not forum --Tadijaspeaks 22:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Wikipedia talk:Do not create hoaxes

message: An article from 17 September 2011 was recently PRODded with evidence that it was a hoax created as a marketing ploy for a restaurant. It purports to describe a tradition in Catalan culture of serving small portions of food. If deleted, would it be eligible for inclusion on this list? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tastet]] 

message: I am surprised to see WP:DWHOAX link to WP:PROD as a suggested remedy. WP:PROD is for uncontroversial deletions so we don't do much research there. Also, the strongest remedy offered by WP:PROD is WP:SOFTDELETE. I think we want stronger action taken for confirmed hoaxes. I think we should replace the WP:PROD link with WP:AFD. ~Kvng (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have implemented this change. ~Kvng (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:PROD]] suggestion
Talk:Till the Clouds Roll By

message: It wouldn't be the first time I asked a question missing the obvious answer, but what does "In 1954, the children played with the television. The children played with Angela Lansbury, and more. This film was set up at 8:00 p.m. from 1954-present:" mean?  --64.193.79.137 (talk) 04:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this line mean? 

message: I'm about 99% sure that "Till the Clouds Roll By" is a song written by Jerome Kern, but that it was not written for the 1946 film, but much earlier, I'm thinking World War I or thereabouts. I'm sure there's a reference to it in the Depression-era song "Let's Have Another Copy of Coffee" which gently lampoons optimistic songs ("Trouble's just a bubble, and the clouds will soon roll by") and I'm almost sure I've heard a scratchy cylinder recording of it. In fact, I assume the movie has that title because "Till the Clouds Roll By" was thought to be the most emblematic Jerome Kern song, much as one might imagine entitling a biopic about Irving Berlin "Blue Skies."
I'd think Wikipedia must have an article about it, but there's no disambiguation link and no link to an article about the song within this one. 
Is there an article about the song? Dpbsmith (talk) 20:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what about the ''song''? 

message: As I am unable to check page histories I suspect a copyrights violation from http://www.answers.com/topic/till-the-clouds-roll-by but unable to nominate for CSD -WikiShagnik (Contribs • Talk) 01:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, got this link from copyvio checker - http://www.enotes.com/topic/Till_the_Clouds_Roll_By -WikiShagnik (Contribs • Talk) 02:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyrights violation
Talk:Alexandros Giotopoulos

message: The article presents only information defending Giotopoulos, and concludes that "his condemnation as leader has clearly no legal basis.". The standard of English is also very poor. LeContexte 14:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scope or requirement creep

message: I agree with whomever nominated this for speedy deletion that the article is badly titled.  The grammar was also in need of cleanup.  I cleaned it up, but then I found this article:  Scope Creep which contains a more relevant title and a better definition of the concept.
*Merge away, then :-) - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 14:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Turkish Cypriots

message: So, the section only vaguely mentions Y-DNA studies (apparently only one?). Nothing said about Mitochondrial, Matrilineal studies. Unfortunately, decades into DNA technological breakthroughs, so many studies are haphazard or incomplete, yet so many people take for granted that these studies don't really say what they are led to think they say.
For example, if Turkish Cypriots have more Y-DNA in common with Turks on the mainland, or in Central Asia, but their Mitochondrial DNA/RNA doesn't match, then their ancestry would essentially be Turkish Conquerors and European 
Mothers (The Pirate Lord Barbarossa had such ancestry, as did many Sultans).2603:7080:CB3F:5032:6C08:C6BB:D786:9226 (talk) 01:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetic Studies Section Stub?
Talk:That's Entertainment!

message: Especially since the film infobox refers here only to the first film, should we consider spinning Part 2, Part 3 and That's Dancing into their own separate articles? 23skidoo 14:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering no one has objected one way or the other for nearly 10 months, and there is currently a trend towards splitting articles in this fashion, I shall do so shortly. 23skidoo 16:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate articles