lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Manner of articulation

message: I was always aware that the /t/ sound, even in the word utter, was a stop (along with its counterpart /d/).  More specifically, a voiceless alveolar stop consonant.  Falcon 21:57, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: you must be non-American then :) - Mustafaa 22:39, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  /t/ sound 

message: I was trying to figure out the vowel chart.  Observationally.  Fingers in mouth, raising tongue to see where it hit, etc.  I found external resources like Observing your articulators with suggestions on how to proceed.  But not much on wikipedia itself.  Perhaps add a section on practical observational anatomical phonetics?  So it isn't all just odd characters and vocabulary, but instead something tangible, accessible.  Something you could show to a six year old.  66.30.119.55 04:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've improved the connectivity of articulatory phonetics, which seems the intended parent of manner of articulation, place of articulation, vowel, and consonant.  So that would seem to be the place to put it.  66.30.119.55 05:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add tips on the simple observation of articulation? 

message: If they were, there would be no difference between /tʃ/ and /t͡ʃ/ in, for instance, Czech words such as podšít [ˈpo̞tʃiːt] and počít [ˈpo̞t͡ʃiːt] (but there is, although, admittedly, in fast or casual speech the difference may disappear). In the former word, /t/ and /ʃ/ each belong to a different syllable, whereas in the latter, they form a single phoneme which, in turn, forms the onset of the second syllable. Other examples include pairs like práce [ˈpraːt͡ʃɛ] and prát se [ˈpraːtsɛ], pod stou [ˈpo̞tsto̞͡u] and poctou [ˈpo̞t͡sto̞͡u] and so on.--Pet'usek [petrdothrubisatgmaildotcom] 18:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affricates are not merely sequences of stops plus fricatives 
Talk:Psyche

message: Article Psyche (disambiguation) listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion June 30 to July 7 2004, consensus was not reached; one disambig page redirected to the other at sysop's discretion.  Discussion:
*There are two disambiguation pages, this one and Psyche, which has more material in it. Lurker 16:20, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I searched for psyche hoping to find a page that would talk about the differences between the Greek word (psyche) and the common translation (soul). Unfortunately the disambiguation page just links to the article for soul, which doesn't really explain either. --Aceizace 18:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psyche ≠ Soul 

message: So...
Where is the link/article for the slang usage of this term, mostly popularised during the 1980s in the U.S.A?
:Yeah I was thinking the same. Should be a Psyche (slang) page, or something like that. --81.183.144.167 01:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A missing usage of this term 

message: how are UUU  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.20.1.213 (talk) 18:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 

message: From 1920 to about 1950, a journal called Psyche appeared. It was edited by C. K. Ogden. Famous people like Bertrand Russell published in it. It is definitely important enough to be included in the list.--217.232.216.90 (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole magazine was reprinted in 1995 as . It is not identical with any of the two journals already listed in the disambiguation.--217.232.216.90 (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the journal that C. K. Ogden edited?
Talk:Star Wars Trading Card Game

message: Added 'notable players' section.
Moved the article to the game's proper name, based on info on the packaging and the WOTC website. -- Netoholic 22:49, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories/Current subprojects

message: I don't really understand the subject of this page.  Is this a ordered, smaller list of all the catagories, which leaves out those that are deep leaf catagories, like :Category:British_ASW_aircraft_1950-1959, or is it something else?  Something I would personally find really useful was a guide to the general outline of the catagory system currently in Wikipedia, so I could begin to have an intuition about where to look to begin catagorizing an article; is that what this page is for?  Right now, it appears to list just various catagories, but without much rhyme or reason, AFAICS...  Any explanation would be appreciated. JesseW 10:54, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly is a "categorization project"? 

message: *Wikipedia:Categorization policy is a bold proposal to make WP categorization more consistent and stable.
:This proposal has been inactive for many months.  For current discussions about categorization policy see: Wikipedia talk:Categorization.  For policy about deleting categories see: Wikipedia talk:Categories for deletion. -- Samuel Wantman 02:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comments

message: About 90% of articles are now categorized, and most of the categories mentioned as "projects" are now well-populated.  The remaining tasks are mostly "mop-up" operations, such as finding articles that have been left behind, improving the organization of the category network, writing intros, enforcing standards, etc.  I've listed coordination points for these tasks, which should steer people in the right place.  If you have another coordination point to add, or a content-specific project that's not mentioned or which I thoughtlessly erased, feel free to add it. -- Beland 04:43, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major cleanup 

message: I thought that a page being current is not a notable point; it's the norm. Why do we need the "(current)" in the title (Wikipedia:Categorization projects was created just now and is a redirect to here)? Brian Jason Drake 11:27, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current? 

message: So far I haven't found a page where there is a project specifically dedicated towards categorizing uncategorized pages. If there is one I'd like to know where the info is. If it doesn't exist, then I propose there should be one. If there was some organization towards clearing that up, I'm sure the wiki would be improved. --Eeee 05:39, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Try User:Bluemoose/Uncategorised_good_articles (copied to Eeee's talk page as well). Carcharoth 07:51, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncategorized pages project? 

message: Is it valuable to add the uncategorized template to articles that don't have at least one category? If so, I would like to write a robot which will do so. How do I seek approval for this project, or work to make sure I'm not duplicating (or subverting!) someone else's effort? -- Mikeblas 17:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  uncat Robot?
Talk:Flag of New Hampshire

message: I think it's excessive to say the state is debating whether to use another design for the flag. One state legislator proposed putting the Old Man of the Mountain on the flag and it was shot down, but that's hardly debate. Is there more discussion? - DavidWBrooks 00:24, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did you hear of this? ANNAfoxlover 20:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was several years ago (note the date on the comment you're responding to) - DavidWBrooks 21:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They could just put it on the seal. - Presidentman 16:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rudy Wiedoeft

message: Old photo moved to talk after better image located. -- Infrogmation 00:29, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does this article contain two spellings of this musician's surname?  Badagnani 14:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct spelling is "Wiedoeft". I tried to move the page, but since the correct form already exists as a redirect page this was not possible since I'm not an administrator. /FredrikT 23:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. -- Infrogmation 08:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of name
Talk:Altaria (Pokémon)

message: As to the origin of the name Altaria:
This Pokemon flies and is cloud-like.  Alta is Spanish for lofty or high.
It is said that this Pokemon enjoys singing.  An aria is an elaborate vocal piece or melody.
---Champignonne
Im sorry to ask but does an Altaria ever appear in any of the manga series? 66.50.95.203 16:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Popular Unity (Chile)

message: Wow, nice context. Plus the word coaleseced goes well with coalition. Please write more like this!! --Uncle Ed 01:13, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: I have reverted recent  extensive additions because they appeared to be plagiarized at least in part. I didn't actually have proper access to one site with similar copy, but found it cached at , and the post is dated Mar 27, 2006, so it is pretty clear who copied whom. Also, some of this seems to have come from . - Jmabel | Talk 01:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Social democrats were initially not member of PU, they joined later, I think it was 1973Constanz - Talk 11:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted an apparently plagiarized passage
Talk:Bias and sensitivity guidelines

message: This seems slightly POV. I'll grant that many of these guidelines are patently ridiculous, but the authors' choices of examples and explanations appears biased against the general idea in an inappropriate fashion. Jxg 03:25, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: Perhaps everything in the article is true, but I'd like to see some documentation on Publishing House stationery, please  207.178.98.103 00:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No verification provided, of any kind
Talk:Gail Edwards

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion July 1 to July 7 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
This looks like just a spoiler, no real context, nothing to make it notable.  SWAdair | Talk  05:01, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This information was based from an interview in which Edwards said that she was offered a series regular role on Happy Days but was not told so by her management because they did not want her to be a "new character on an old show."  It was elaborated on in the Happy Days Wiki page saying that Crystal Bernard would eventually fill the role.  It was further elaborated on in the Gail Edwards Wiki page saying, “Edwards competed with Bernard for the role, and initially won the part.” This is simply not true due to the fact that Edwards was never told about the role until years after the incident. Other writings from this contributor are incorrect as well – e.g., ABC no longer controlled the show – hence, they did not cancel it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DabbsEdwards (talk • contribs) 22:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gail Edwards on Happy Days
Talk:Lexical definition

message: Someone more familiar with the computing usage is encouraged to edit this and expand (or correct) the bottom portion... Mindspillage 05:06, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: Hi, I’m completing a university course on Wikipedia and would like to make the following recommendations for this article. I recommend the addition of the headings 'Usage' and 'References'. I also recommend the addition of two resources, first  and second  (Oxford Reference combines about a million entries from their Dictionaries, Companions and Encyclopedias).
--MeerkatShadow (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve this article
Talk:Nürtingen

message: The article says: "1783/1784 : Friedrich Hölderlin and Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling are pupils of the Latin school (German: Lateinschule)", but the Schelling article does not mention this. Is it just that he went to school in N. later or earlier than the one mentioned in the Schelling article? Or is there a mistake here? --Nevilley 09:06, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Walter J. Turner

message: This writer published and is known under the name W.J. Turner. In accordance with Wikipedia naming practices, the article should be titled accordingly, with his full name spelled out at the top of the article. -- Viajero 09:40, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The body of this article was added by an anonymous editor. I had added the B&D; then added the unreferenced tag. I hope this editor will finish their work by adding sources. -- Michael David 01:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous edit 

message: I am surprised that he was not accused of being gay. He wrote a poem about teenage love for boys (https://www.bartleby.com/103/158.html, entitled Romance), and he lived with Siegfried Sassoon for a time, and Sassoon was known as bisexual. 
On the other hand, the poem may be just written from a girl's point of view, and he was married when he lived with Sassoon. So... eh?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.249.226.41 (talk) 23:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, was he gay? 

message: The lede gives his birth-year as 1889. But he is listed under the category '1884 births'. One of them must be wrong. Valetude (talk) 05:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year?
Category talk:Transgender people

message: I have a question as to the use of he or she to refer to people who have already undergone SRS? I would prefer (as I have been taught by the people I know who have gone through it) to use the pronoun so that it refers to their current physical gender (she for MtF post-ops, etc.). Does a policy alreayd exist on this? -Yupik 07:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, it's just a matter of courtesy to call people their intended gender -- so, in most cases, people who have already had SRS would be called their current gender, since that is what they want to be. -VZG 05:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I'm used to, too. This article needs to be recleaned up to meet that standard. -Yupik 14:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronoun usage?

message: Is the category for body modification really appropriate?  Many transgender people do not pursue bodily modifications, so it seems like that category should be removed.  Vis-a-visconti (talk) 11:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Body modification?

message: Wouldn't it be better to divide this category into two: "Transgender and transsexual people" and "People who did a transition" (or something like this)?
The fact is that the transition is made not only by transgender people but also by intersex people, as well as people who subsequently detransition... --HalfOfDwarf (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wouldn't it be better to separate this category into two? 

message: the classification  is not about genders alone, it doesn't imply it's merely/simply a gender. But as talked here, transgender is considered a gender identity too, and it's the item used in the  of Mocchi and Leslie Feinberg. This situation is analogous to agenderness. Is it a gender? --MikutoH  talk!  01:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The word "identity" is also problematic because many transgender people do not identify as such. That is comparable to gay people for whom the word "orientation" is more commonly used than "identity". That is of course not to say that I think transgender should be referred to as a "gender orientation" because nobody else uses that terminology. Transgender people just are transgender without an appropriate commonly used noun describing what sort of thing transgender is. The only very clear thing about it is that they fall under the umbrella of LGBT. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:People by gender]]
Talk:List of English words of Japanese origin

message: Where are the English words?  All these words are Romanized Japanese words.  The only words on this list that have been integrated into the English language and are not specifically associated with Japanese are futon, tycoon, tsunami, karaoke and tofu.  All the other words are specifically associated with Japanese things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6031:4F:31CF:4D93:100A:5802 (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Many people agree with you. The problem is that no one so far has been able to devise objective inclusion criteria (that do not just rely on an individual editor's opinion) so as to eliminate the clearly non-English words. 86.161.61.208 (talk) 03:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

text: The criterion should be that there be some documented usage of the word, in English, not referring to anything specifically Japanese. I'm sure we could find examples along these lines of "tycoon", "honcho", "kanban", etc., and even plenty of "sushi", and fail to find any for "miso", "bunraku", etc. 69.113.154.22 (talk) 04:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the English words? 

message: This is short for "Off-job Training".  How is it supposed to be a Japanese word, even if they have later adapted it into "ofujētī"?  Rojomoke (talk) 08:51, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's reasonable for inclusion, but under Japanese-of-English, not here. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted.  Rojomoke (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offjt 

message: What about Tamagotchi? Stuffed cat (talk) 14:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Tamagotchi is more like "Kleenex". It might be used to refer to similar toys of a different brand, but it's still understood as a reference to that specific brand of toys. 69.113.154.22 (talk) 04:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamagotchi 

message: hi 49.146.218.116 (talk) 13:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  englis
Talk:BMX racing

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.bmxv.com.au/html/get_started.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Fixed some grammar. 207.225.44.90 (talk) 21:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed some typo's
Talk:Battle of Changban

message: In Chang Ban, only they dared stand tall in the face of certain defeat regardless of how the situation was. Zhao Yun, the brave hero of Shu. Zhang Fei, the bold titan of Shu.
As Cao Cao (From the Novel) attacked the hundreds of thousand people that traveled with Liu Bei, the Shu ruler loses his child in the chaos as he scurries to safety; however, the brave Zhao Yun turns about and recklessly charges into the Wei lines of Cao Cao's army searching everywhere for Liu Chan. As he went about slaying here and there, Cao Cao eventaully received word of how much of a marvel Zhao Yun was.
"A very tiger of a leader! I must have get him alive!" Quote from Cao Cao after he sees the daring deeds done from a hill top.
Although Zhao Yun was the brave at Chang Ban, Zhang Fei takes the title of Bold as he guarded Liu Bei's rear flank. After Zhao Yun passed safely over the bridge where Zhang Fei guarded, the brave Shu general was soon met by Cao Ren, Xiahou Dun, Xiahou Yuan, Li Dian, Yue Jing, Zhang Liao, Xu Chu, Zhang He, and various generals of Cao Cao. Although he was out-numbered by the many Wei soldiers, commanders, and generals, Zhang Fei still stood firm and his unshakable appearance struck fear in the minds of the Wei army.
"Guan Yu had said that his brother Zhang Fei was the sort of man to go through an army of a hundred legions and take the head of its commander-in-chief, and do it easily." Quote from Cao Cao while viewing Zhang Fei at the bridge.
*In the valley of Chang Ban
*Zhang Fei was the bold
*In the Long Slope on horse back
*Zhao Yun is the brave
*Together they stand invincible
*Now they are legends
--Zhang Liao 06:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Valley of the Brave and Bold 
Talk:Yob

message: This page was placed on Votes for Deletion in June 2004. Consensus was to keep as redirect.
ola aqui e o urso mede mais informaçao
deste saite em portugues  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.26.208.153 (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ableton Live

message: I swear there was a complete, annotated list of the history of Ableton Live releases on this page, but it's been removed, and I don't see a reason in the Talk page. Was it moved to its own article but not linked, or is it simply gone?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by QVXO (talk • contribs) 10:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , hi. I removed that in this revision. As I put in the edit summary, I deleted it because of the WP:RELEASENOTES policy, which says that Wikipedia is not the place for exhaustive logs of software updates: "To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." Cheers. Popcornfud (talk) 11:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can see where you're coming from. However there are plenty of wiki pages with version histories available, not necessarily version logs. I think the table should be implemented back when it can change to be a smaller version history rather than an extensive change log. DreamlessGlare (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of list of versions? 

message: The current logo is out of date, if anyone can find and upload the Ableton 11 logo that would be great :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DreamlessGlare (talk • contribs) 19:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add new image 

message: The article starts talking about "Max" without introducing what it is Theone256 (talk) 07:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think an intro is necessary. just use a page link. AnimatorExtreme (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nta317 (talk) 00:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Piety, Power, and Propaganda. Art and Architectural History of the Islamic
Talk:Bupkes

message: Having this entry redirect to Yiddish is pointless. When I look a word up, I want to know what it means. I just looked up bupkes, and the amount of information I got was "it's yiddish". On a scale of usefulness of 1 to 10, that's maybe a 0.5. --Kamagurka 10:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, what is it?
Talk:Guillaume Durand

message: The 1911 encyclopedia states that he died in 1334, here. --Magnus Manske 12:56, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
The 1911 encyclopedia is not quite uptodate. Guillaume Durand senior died in 1296. It appears some research has been done since 1911. Traiectinus 12:25, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Anyone know of any publication (online or in book form) of his Pontifical?  The Jade Knight (talk) 08:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found a facsimile here.  Anyone know of a translation in English or French?  The Jade Knight (talk) 05:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pontifical