lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:German cruiser Emden

message: German cruiser Emden seems a strange choice of name for this article which describes one of three German (light) cruisers called Emden. I notice there are a number of WW2 ship articles with the prefix German cruiser or German battleship. However, the similar WW1 ships seem to be referred to with the simpler prefix SMS. What would an article on the second Emden be called?
The article itself refers to it being the third Emden but doesn't link to pages for the other two. Note that there is already a detailed article on the famous First World War merchant raider Emden (i.e. the first Emden), see SMS Emden.
There is a useful article in the German wikipedia called Emden (Schiff) at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emden_(Schiff)  which describes in detail all three cruisers and also two frigates called Emden although it has much less information on this third Emden than is provided here. 
How about a disambiguation page for Emden that could clear this up? Nigel Campbell 00:31, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Original design was 4 twin turrets, this was changed to 8 single turrets. Click on the picture in the table to magnify it, then you will see that two single-turrets were put on each side of the ship. Nevfennas 10:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added a small clarification ( 8 less effective single-gun turrets)--Muniam 15:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with other ships called ''Emden'' 

message: About "The group consisted of the flagship …":
If Emden was the flagship, I think this would be better phrased as "The group consisted of Emden as the flagship …". If she wasn't - who was? --2003:C4:DF27:4472:BD45:5890:4E71:7D67 (talk) 23:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarified, thanks for bringing it up. Parsecboy (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Weserübung
Talk:List of armed conflicts

message: I'm not sure this page deserve to exist... what's an armed conflict? define it.... is it a battle but not total war?  How come you had the 2003 invasion of Iraq as being USA vs. Iraq and France... France didn't support it but they didn't send troops to Iraq.... the Chechen conflict is actually in the Asian part of Russia... Gang wars vs USA? if you have that there would also be the war on drugs in many countries... the Saudi government vs. terrorists... and just about every country in the world vs urban gangs. gren 18:03, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dynamic scoping

message: I've just rewritten the majority of the discussion here, and it seems to have as much to do with binding as with scoping.  Should (instead of the recommended merges) all the pages relevant to this subject be refactored somehow?  --Tardis 00:55, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We just learned about this stuff in my computer science class so I'm by no means an authority, but I don't agree with "refactoring" these scoping articles with binding. They seem to be separate concepts that are strongly related but are still clearly separate. Scoping and binding are given their own sections in the material I've read.Krymson 05:16, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not claiming that scoping and binding are the same thing (I said refactor, not merge everything!), just that it would be a bit odd to merge dynamic scoping into just "scoping" when half of what it talks about is actually more relevant to binding.  Is there a way to talk about dynamic scope without it ending up being about dynamic binding?  --Tardis 21:52, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with...?
Talk:Naked Snake

message: Ok, this page used to be redirected to Big Boss page, as it's a DAMN HUGE SPOILER I just made another page w/ another picture, ok? Now Big Boss has his page and Naked Snake has another, but the pages are pretty much identical. So if you're gonna update one, update the other too. Thanks. -Imperator 18:38, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I recommend to include only information of Big Boss' early life and his potrayal as Naked Snake (including name debate) in MGS3 in the Naked Snake article, while include information of his post-Snake Eater career and his potrayal in the MSX games in the Big Boss page. Jonny2x4 18:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pages splitted

message: It's a bit superfluous to have a duplicate page with mirrored content just to avoid a spoiler. I removed all of the identical information and added a note about the possible spoiler and his identity.  --Asriel 21:33, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
: Yeah, cool thing you did. Nice! -Imperator 18:48, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision
Talk:Fernie, British Columbia

message: :Fernie is the only city-class municipality in Canada that is fully encircled by the Rocky Mountains
I removed the yeah-so-what line about "unique weather patterns....this far inland"; anywhere in the world, never mind BC, has "unique climate/weather patterns"; the statement was made, like the above, as if this were something miraculous and not just the way things are in the Cordilleran climate-map.  As far as the above line goes I'm not sure what to do with it - it's very misleading, and also overbloated as right off the bat there are eight provinces and three territories of Canada where the Rocky Mountains do not exist (not that I've heard anyway).  that Banff, though larger than Fernie I think, isn't a city technically helps this line out (which seems to be from Fernie tourist brochures).  But as far as "encircled by....mountains",  Nelson and Creston are "encircled by the Selkirk Mountains", Trail, Castlegar and Revelstoke are "encircled by the Selkirk and Monashee Mountains" or "encircled by the Columbia Mountains"....is this really "geography" or is this "tourist hype"?  I think the latter....Skookum1 (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also pulled out "the noted backcountry resort" qualifiers for island Park Lodge, which is as its page says, the City of Fernie, and hence isn't backcountry in the slightest unless you're looking at the whole of Canada that way (anywhere within a short few minutes drive of Highway 3 scarcely qualifies as "backcountry").  That article needs anti-POV/promo editing, maybe I'll do some but for now I'll just add the WP template(s).Skookum1 (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Geography overbloat

message: Does anyone have a link to a reliable source for the films and TV shows listed in the film section? I wasn't able to find any through Google. Air.light (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film section 

message: I was making changes to the Mount Proctor page and it seems officially according to CGNDB and BCGNIS, this peak is named "Mount Procter". Can any locals comment about this naming confusion on the Talk:Mount Proctor? Thanks. RedWolf (talk) 06:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Proctor vs Mount Procter
Talk:Emmen, Netherlands

message: Removed the following. Most of this is unreliable. 
==history==
emmen is the biggest community in drenthe, nobody knows who founded it,
the dolmens (hunnebedden) around emmen proof that emmen excits a long time
back in the middle ages emmen was a very small town, when napoleon conqeur it,
he banned the 'stadsrechten'(city rights) witch mean that little town's (like emmen)would
never be regonized as a city,after napoleon the question of 'turf' begin to grow,
but only drenthe contained lots of lots 'turf' but it was a long way from north-holland
(where the qeustion and elaboration of 'turf'was the biggest)
and they couldn't force the labors to walk a 1000 mile's up and down for only some
'turf' so they decided to build emmen bigger so the labors didn't have to walk that far,
in that time emmen grow a lot bigger but not bigger than a medium-sized town,
after the second worldwar emmen growth a lot bigger it became as big as a city,
it became the biggest community of drenthe but because the 'stadsrechten'(city rights)
where banned, emmen stayd a town, but the community was regnosides, today the day emmen is probaly the biggest town, emmen is almost as big as assen, whitch is the capital of
drenthe.
(forgive me my spelling i'm dutch and i live in emmen)
Andres 19:17, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unreliable stuff 
Talk:Logic board

message: Could someone expand on this topic?  Apple seems inconsistent. 
* From http://www.apple.com/xserve/
: In addition, Xserve G5 features dual Gigabit Ethernet on the motherboard, which, combined with the high bandwidth system controller, means you won’t get contention between your network traffic and other I/O.
* From http://www.apple.com/xserve/design.html
: Gigabit for two: Xserve comes with dual Gigabit Ethernet on the main logic board so you can serve more clients without contention.
Emphasis mine. AlistairMcMillan 22:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Xserve isn't a full-fledged computer. SushiGeek 18:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logic board different from motherboard

message: ..I can't see that a Motherboard necessarily needs a BIOS. The definition seems quite wrong to me. DavidFarmbrough 07:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems wrong to me... 

message: Liquidmark 04:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with these points and will edit the article to reflect the differences. Cliph 23:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: all fine, except Apple also called the Apple II boards logic boards, even though they do fit the defintion of motherboard. Logic board is just an Apple-ism  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Grief...
Talk:Manuel Corral

message: It is the convention of Wikipedia that Sedevacantist antipopes are listed by their legal names and not their regnal names, so "Pope Peter II" has been redirected here.  Also, there have been multiple claimants to the name of "Pope Peter II". Iceberg3k 19:21, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
How old is he ?
:I looked, but information is rather scant so I couldn't add anything.--T. Anthony 10:18, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Much of this text looks like it belongs on this page rather than in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.206.112.162 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? Much of what text looks like it belongs on what page? —MiraLuka 23:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: Both this article and the one about the other anti-Pope from the Palmarians mention sexual sins... what sexual sins? That leaves us open to great deal of interpretation. Please respond on my talk page. --V. Joe 19:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual sins? 
Talk:Snuba

message: "Snuba is an underwater breathing system, patented by Snuba International" is misleading to the extent that the patent expired in 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.80.90 (talk) 23:15, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be worth mentioning if you have a source to refer the information to. I've done a minor copyedit to present the information about the patent in a less prominent position. --RexxS (talk) 00:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Patented" 
Talk:Nasdaq, Inc.

message: Global Energy Efficient Transport Index redirects here, but is not explained in the article. -- Beland (talk) 18:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This website might help. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 05:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Energy Efficient Transport Index 
Talk:Salvation in Catholicism

message: On 10 April 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Salvation in Catholicism for a record of the discussion. —Xezbeth 19:37, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
 ==more info at ITC==
http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=CYAWSZtSsmAC&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95&dq=International+Theological+Commission,+Select+questions+on+God+the+Redeemer&source=bl&ots=3gyhks_bME&sig=PyUtMup0Xmq2p2vFsHdS4dVTYcU&hl=en&ei=9sRyTrirEYmtiAfGirGhBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=International%20Theological%20Commission%2C%20Select%20questions%20on%20God%20the%20Redeemer&f=false
Please use this for more data. Lafem (talk) 03:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Montclair State University

message: The list of buildings takes up a lot of space, but none of it is referenced and it is unclear whether these buildings have any historical or cultural significance. Simply listing names upon names of buildings is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I propose deleting these sections if nothing changes. Melchior2006 (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody commented on this, I will delete the lists. --Melchior2006 (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on residence halls 

message: Carmela Soprano, a fictional character, is listed under other notable alumni. Perhaps this should be deleted or moved to a new section such as references in fiction. Canus (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni vs references in fictional works
Talk:Procrustes

message: Any source for the geometric meaning? Charles Matthews 20:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was quite convinced that Procrustes was an innkeeper, rather
than some sort of roving bandit as the article implies, and indeed
Robert Graves seems to agree with me.  This is the brief mention of
Procrustes from The Greek Myths (96 k 6):
: On reaching Attic Corydallus, Theseus slew Sinis's father Polypemon, surnamed Procrustes, who lived beside the road and had two beds in his house, one small the other large.  Offering a night's lodging to travellers, he would lay the short men on the large bad, and rack them out to fit it; but the tall men on the small bed, sawing off as much of their legs as projected beyond it.  Some say, however, that he used only one bed, and lengthened or shortened his lodgers according to its measure.  In either case, Theseus served him as he had served others. [And Graves then references Diodorus Siculus: iv. 59; Apollodorus: Epitome i. 4; Pausanias: i. 38. 5; Hyginus: Fabula 38; and Plutarch: Theseus II in case anyone would like to go back to the original sources.]
Note in particular the reference to two beds!
Richard W.M. Jones 17:23, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Procrustes an innkeeper? 

message: The book of Jasher recounts the story of the four judges of Sodom and Gomorrah, who among other obscene injustices arrested and tortured immigrants to their cities with the rack (a form of the Procrustean Bed) and other fiendish methods.
See my note in Talk:Rack (torture), also see the extracanonical book of Jasher, ch. 19 v. 3-6, which can be read at http://www.ccel.org/a/anonymous/jasher/19.htm . TurtleofXanth 03:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like Peter G Werner covered this on the linked to talk page. Further, I think that the Greek version came first in any case. --Falcorian (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the Procrustean Bed actually invented in Sodom? 

message: There is a story by the English writer Nugent Barker, "The Curious Adventure of Mr. Bond" 
(1939)  that retells the story of Procrustes in a modern setting. Maybe
we could list that story in the entry? 176.61.97.121 (talk) 23:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: In Fiction 

message: I was trying to understand the meaning of the edit from 2016 January 22‎ at 11:47 by Panacea ad libitum and am totally confused. I'm not even certain what the symbol ´ (single close quote?) is supposed to mean in this context. He says the reason for his edit is: "‎I added more information regarding this allegory used by the author Nicholas Nassim Taleb in a recent book already mentioned", but if it doesn't make sense, then we need to remove it.
Here is the text added:
:Giving continuation to this idea, in Antifragile, the author uses the image of the Procrustean Bed as an allegory to modernity, linking it to nowadays´ man fear of randomness.
WesT (talk) 20:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:Glasnost

message: I don't think the Objectives section needs to be separate from the Glasnost in USSR and in Russia section.  There's more about the objectives in the first section.  If no one objects, I will change it. -Athaler 16:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 

message: I just did a quick sweep on grammar and punctuation. Hope nobody minds.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.149.105 (talk) 11:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Surely, claiming that soviet Government has killed 25-60 mln soviet people is neutral and needs only bullshit to become a fact. Only liberal point of view is neutral because liberal media informs us. We can accuse anybody in any crimes. It is not neutral to point to the opposite statements, even when they are made by official researcher. --Javalenok (talk) 11:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: It is clear to me that Gorbachev, from a peasant background, rather than a Bolshevik background, was himself relatively uninformed regarding Soviet history, most notably the occupation of the Baltic states. Thus he was blindsided by the legitimate claims of independence that they made. Not sure I can find a decent source for this. The closest is  User:Fred Bauder Talk 18:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Effect of glasnost

message: Every translation I've ever seen on Glasnost has defined the term as being 'openness' not 'publicity'. Whoever put 'publicity' down as an accurate English definition of Glasnost should justify their translation. 184.76.56.97 (talk)JSJR 10182013  —Preceding undated comment added 10:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to https://dictionary.com/browse/glasnost, "First recorded in 1980-85, glasnost is from the Russian word glásnost' literally, publicity (taken to mean openness)". Developer45 (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: not only is this unsourced but this https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/apollo-moon-khrushchev/ interview with the son of nikita khruschev says that it was in Pravda:
q- How widely was the news of the moon landing disseminated in the Soviet Union in advance of the event?
a- "Of course, you cannot have people land on the moon and just say nothing. It was published in all the newspapers. But if you remember [back then] when Americans spoke of the first man in space, they were always talking of "the first American in space" [not Yuri Gagarin]. The same feeling was prevalent in Russia. There were small articles when Apollo 11 was launched. Actually, there was a small article on the first page of Pravda and then three columns on page five. I looked it up again."
if this was false information i would suggest removing the entire paragraph until you can properly factcheck it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.61.206 (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "previously suppressed events such as the first manned moon landing by the United States"
Talk:Battle of Algiers (disambiguation)

message: There seems to be no link to the article about the Battle of Algiers on the disambiguation page, which makes it impossible to access the article (if it exists). Can someone fix this?
Why do we have this and The Battle of Algiers (film)?
---
I have just removed the content from this page and redirected to The Battle of Algiers. The DVD Box cover, subtitles, and IMDB all give the English title with the article "The." Andrew Levine 02:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Template talk:Docpng

message: Shouldn't all this be on the article page? The article page does not say anything about the template. I had to look at the Talk to see what this template was intended for.
--Noah (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk pages are for discussing the pages to which they pertain. I consider it silly to write convoluted code to display documentation directly on template pages, which should simply contain templates. You're welcome to do the popular thing, though. — Xiong熊talk* 21:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've now moved it. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 08:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation
Talk:Youthquake (album)

message: Do not ever replace another person's post.
:Please read Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and other pages about Wikipedia provided there. By contributing to Wikipedia, you are signing over your contributions to further edits, often merciless, by any other member of the community. Every article belongs to everyone, and no one. Samaritan 20:30, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pain and pleasure

message: I think its a good article but its kind of just there. There isnt a ton of info but sometimes less is more. --Bthompson3691 (talk) 23:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  My view on this article for my psych class 

message: I was reading your article, however there is not much information in your article. Also the use of the word probably when referring to a statement shows uncertainity in the information, that is provided in your article. This article would be greatly inproved by adding more information to the content of the article and less links. R.Tonioli10 (talk) 20:34, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critique for Psychology 101
Talk:Rave Un2 the Joy Fantastic

message: "However, overall, these contributions make a minor impact on the album. Ultimately, with its slick, plastic production and relatively unremarkable song-writing, the sound of the album is quite similar to 1998's poorly-received Newpower Soul."--Kilojake (talk) 02:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Deletions

message: The article refers to O'Henry Sound Studios in New York, but the article on O'Henry Sound Studios says that it's it Burbank, California. Is some clarification needed on this point? bd2412 T 01:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[O'Henry Sound Studios]] in [[New York]]? 
Wikipedia talk:Cleanup Taskforce/closed

message: Er...I'm quite pleased with how Phosphorus cycle was improved. What is the protocol for closing a task—should I, as the nominator, close it? Or is it closed by the one whose desk it is on? And what does it mean to move it to "/closed"? — Knowledge Seeker দ 07:22, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closing tasks 

message: I've put the simplified closed tasks procedure on the /closed page.  There is no need for page moves, just a link to the item page at Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/article needing fixing.  SteveW | Talk 20:54, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finalised (maybe) closed tasks procedure
Talk:Giles

message: I have amended this page, attempting to comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). If anyone thinks another new article Giles (given name) is warranted, feel free to add draft contents for it below. - Fayenatic london (talk) 12:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: New article now added. Fayenatic (talk) 11:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup per Manual of Style
Talk:José Francisco Ruiz Massieu

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 