Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics/INCOTW/Archive 1

message: I think the two old nominations recently removed should be restored, considering there are only two nominations currently on the page. They look like this: (Dmcdevit 03:32, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominated February 1, 2005; needs 5 votes by February 8, 2005 	 
		 
Support: 	 
#Arunram 15:29, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Nominated February 14, 2005; needs 5 votes by February 21, 2005 	 
	 
Support: 	 
#Dmcdevit 23:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoring Nominations

message: :Nominated February 1, 2005; needs 5 votes by February 8, 2005 	 
		 
Support: 	 
#Arunram 15:29, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Narain Karthikeyan]]

message: :Nominated February 14, 2005; needs 5 votes by February 21, 2005 	 
	 
Support: 	 
#Dmcdevit 23:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Manmohan Singh]]

message: Anyone who knows the Urdu script, please verify that this edit on the page Manmohan Singh done by User:The Village Idiot is in good faith. I have my doubts. deeptrivia 08:55, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
In good faith. It does spell Manmohan Singh but the user seems to be spelling from English to Urdu, There is no g sound in Singh when you write it in Hindi or Urdu. --Notquiteauden 21:25, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it is Manmohan Singh. I'm not sure about the spellings though. --IncMan 03:56, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Verify 

message: I notice that the article on the Indian Subcontinent is merged with South Asia. Is it right to have the same articles on both the topics? Indian Subcontinent and South Asia are two different terms and according to me, merging the two topics perhaps wasn't a good idea. Thanks -- 19:02, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Indian Subcontinent]] 

message: It would be great if we can have some start on the following (at least a list of members in each lok sabha)
All the information can be found here
1st Lok Sabha
2nd Lok Sabha
3rd Lok Sabha
4th Lok Sabha
5th Lok Sabha
6th Lok Sabha
7th Lok Sabha
8th Lok Sabha
9th Lok Sabha
10th Lok Sabha
11th Lok Sabha
12th Lok Sabha
13th Lok Sabha
deeptrivia 15:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lok Sabha 

message: I have been working on History of Rupee. Inputs will be highly appreciated. deeptrivia 05:06, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Really nice idea - I would like to join. --Bhadani 11:12, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Feel free to make any changes. Do you know of any images of Indian coins that are not copyrighted? In fact, we need a whole lot of work on Indian coinage.  deeptrivia 13:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[History of Rupee]] 

message: Postal History of India will be an interesting topic to work on. Here's an interesting link to begin with. deeptrivia 14:59, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Postal History of India]] 

message: I've been working on the Malwa article, and would like to request all editors to review the article. Seems like we can easily make it into a featured article. Any suggestions and/or contributions will be highly appreciated. deeptrivia 05:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The right place to post this is probably the talkpage of WP:INWNB. --Gurubrahma 06:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: Since, the military history of India seems to be the INCOTW from time immemorial, shall I be bold and suggest that, we nominate the article with the highest no. of votes (even if it has recieved just 1 vote) and rotate it every week (max every fortnight, if the scope is too large).  --Pamri • Talk 15:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah sure, I was planning to do it and pitch for Jagjivan Ram before you came up with the idea abt Indian cuisine. I think it should be the COTW as it has 3 votes already. And let's please cap it with a fortnight at the most. Also, it may probably be good to identify a set of to-do activities for every cotw article. For example, if Jagjivan Ram wd be the cotw, the to-do list wd include, among other things, - a PD image, a book reference etc. --Gurubrahma 16:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree. Not much is going on at Military history of India lately anyway. Although the article is still not up to the mark, probably we can come back to it later and have a fresh look. deeptrivia 16:19, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree. I hope to resume at least my copyediting work of the INCOTW. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 16:21, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reboot 

message: Anybody interested in setting this up? In the light of earthquake we are seeing collaboration and solidarity across subcontinent. Any takers? Autumnleaf 16:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUBCONTINENTAL collaboration of the week?