Talk:Politics of Australia

message: What has a list of government departments got to do with the politics of Australia? They belong in an article about administration. Adam 13:27, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree I keep getting frustratrated at having nowhere to link Australian Government and similar. This term refers to parliament and the public service and is quite a different thing to Politics of Australia. In fact recently all federal government departments rebranded themselves with the Government of Australia crest, and the department name smaller underneath. Has anyone started on an article about this stuff that we can redirect appropriate things to? Maybe this is worth listing on the Australian wikipedians' notice board as an article that needs work/colaboration.  Martyman 23:02, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh good I'm not the only one irked about this.--ZayZayEM 03:10, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Government deparments

message: What is the purpose of the Political data section in this article? Most of it is either covered in the Government section, or not relavent to an article on politics of Australia. The only part worth saving is the list of parties, which should be moved to the Political parties section. - Borofkin 01:13, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I left International organisations. Not sure what to do with it. - Borofkin 03:24, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political data 

message: An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Politics_of_Australia article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add  to this page. — LinkBot 00:58, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:LinkBot/suggestions/Politics_of_Australia|Link suggestions]] 

message: most politics of articles for other countries include a discussion of (or at least Main article: links) government.  for better or worse, people expect a politics articles to include a discussion of government, and so the politics of article can be thought of as a "top-level" article, with more specialised material in more specific articles.  with the wikipedia:summary style we can do this nicely with short summaries of the major articles in the area.  please don't revert this without a discussion here on the talk page.  thanks. clarkk 23:54, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need for articles to duplicate what is in other articles. If people want to know about the structure of Australian government, they can look in the relevant articles, to which I have provided links. This article is about Australian politics. The changes you have made create the bizarre situation that the opening paragraph of the article has nothing whatever to do with the topic of the article. It is as if the article Butterflies of South America begins with a discussion of the Theory of relativity. Adam 00:57, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: i don't think that the analogy of butterflies and relativity is apt, many of the politics of... articles include a section on the system of government, see politics of the United States and politics of the United Kingdom, since the system of government is relevant to politics.  i am not trying to duplicate information, i am simply summarising it (in fact i did not write the original summaries, i was simply restoring the summaries that were already there).  this is a standard way of organising articles (did you look at the summary style?), government is usually thought of as an aspect of the overall politics of a country. clarkk 02:00, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  article format