Talk:Human rights education

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Human rights education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141208080853/http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html to http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Many of these do not seem to be HRE orgs, rather HR orgs. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 07:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Orgs

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Human rights education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071216055141/http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/decade.htm to http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/decade.htm
*Added  tag to http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D2754%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html
*Added  tag to http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D1923%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013044250/http://ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/programme.htm to http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/education/training/programme.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080121001519/http://www.education.leeds.ac.uk/research/cchre/ to http://www.education.leeds.ac.uk/research/cchre/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Human rights education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D2754%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D1923%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140106110618/http://scu.hre2013.org.tw/ to http://www.scu.hre2013.org.tw/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221090354/http://www.humanrightseducationuganda.com/ to http://www.humanrightseducationuganda.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110411121849/http://www.hrea.org/erc/Library/pre-service/syllabus-ibo02.pdf to http://www.hrea.org/erc/Library/pre-service/syllabus-ibo02.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I've just edited part of the Section on HRE Organisations to provide a link and bring this a little up to date, but I agree with the template on this Section. It's not useful to have this much detail on specific organisations in this article.  Perhaps simply list relevant HRE organisations?  Regarding the article itself, perhaps just have a chronological survey of the specific UN instruments on HRE? At the moment it seems all over the place. Research17 (talk) 23:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with template on HRE organisations 

message: Hello, I am a student at Texas A&M University working on an editing project assigned by User:Etherfire. I am looking to review this article and assess possible changes to improve its clarity. These changes will include restructuring, rearranging information, and focusing the article. Any possible changes I plan to implement will be posted here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.33.83.24 (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Editing Plans 

message: Even now, I do not think I got to do everything I wanted on it, so I’m going to continue to work on it in the future if I can. This article  felt like an essay that someone uploaded to Wikipedia. I had to go through all the writing and try to rephrase it in a way that did not contain any bias or peacock language. I believe that Wikipedia said that articles should be written without any promotion, so I had to make all of the sentences factual instead of opinionated.
I began with the lead. I tried to smooth out their sentences, as they were a little unclear in the original way, and take out repeated information. I placed some info from later in the piece up there as well but have not had the chance to incorporate it in yet. 
I then went down to history as I know that is the section that is usually first after a lead in a lot of articles. I tried to find an article that was like this one, but there were not many options that looked similar enough to mimic, so I ended up settling with the right to education article. I worked on the history section of the article and quickly tried to find sources as so much of this information was unsupported. That was when I realized that another article was plagiarized off of for this Wikipedia article or vice versa. (https://www.k12academics.com/education-issues/human-rights-education/human-rights-education-history) This was not the only section that plagiarized/was plagiarized off of. I could not put 3 of the 4 paragraphs in quotation marks so I tried to rephrase sentences where I could, but as I was not the researcher, I didn’t want to change them too much and possibly change the meaning of them. I also had to rearrange the information as it was not in chronological order. This had been one of the later sections in the original piece, so I had to make a lot of Wikipedia links show up in this one as well. I found other information in the article that related to current events but had not been updated since at least 2018. I then created a subsection titled progressing development. I was very unsure about this as I know there will come a time when this section is also outdated, but I feel like current events had to be mentioned in the present tense. When I moved onto the next section that I retitled as education, I was not fully sure what to include in here. I wasn’t sure if the focus should be on how the education has incorporated this subject or the educating of people on incorporating human rights education into their curriculum. This may be why the section may seem a little unfocused still.
When I moved onto the model’s section, I was very confused as I did not really know what these were. Even now, I am not totally sure they should be included as this feels like it may be going too in-depth, but I ended up having to research it myself so I could give a brief description as to what was happening. This was the other section that might have been plagiarized, and even then, I was not sure what each model was by their explanation, so I had to go find other definitions that made more sense and add their sources. The last remaining model was a big block of information. I had to cut out what I thought was unnecessary and then combine the information into separate paragraphs. 
The point I am at now is looking at the section full of quotes. I wanted to scrap the whole thing, but I felt like there was some useful information there. Plus, I would hate to entirely throw out someone else’s work when it could just be reorganized to fit. I am also still looking at the Organizations section. This was also a section with a lot of text that could probably benefit from some information cutting.
For this piece I spent a lot of time on trying to make the sentences comprehensible and find sources, but I also had to do a lot of reorganization to try to give it some logical flow from one section to the next. Jazzie444 (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: More in depth summary