lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Punk (fireworks)

message: :That was vandalism.  I removed it.  Dave6 talk 05:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, "common knowledge" in me own mis-spent youth as well. Numerous cultures in the historical (wagon-train pioneer) American West and modern Middle East use(d) cow or buffalo (or camel?) dung for fuel, so it's not all that far-fetched. If I find time, I'll go looking for references... __Just plain Bill 03:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Camel poop?

message: The word "punk" is used for various kinds of tinder / fire-carrying materials, including dry, rotted wood, the fibers of Fomes fomentarius, cattails (which can can be lit and burn slowly much like big thick versions of the fireworks punk described in this article, or soaked in fat or wax and used torches, or turned into a fluff that makes great tinder). 
It might make sense to combine these along with this page into a more general punk-as-tinder article. What do people think of this? Or would it be better to add separate links to the punk disambiguation page? (Actually I think I may do that for now as the more conservative approach.)--Ericjs (talk) 04:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punk for various kinds of tinder
Talk:El Barrio (singer)

message: It simply must be possible to describe this band in a more neutral way. As it is, it seems to call for the immediate apotheosis of the lead singer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agger (talk • contribs) 08:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  You'd think the author was having sex with the singer, the prose is that gushing!  Skinsmoke (talk) 22:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A band (or group) consists of more than one person.  El Barrio is a solo artist.  Skinsmoke (talk) 22:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band? 
Talk:Eugenio Lascorz

message: First of all, I haven't found any sources where such thing was affirmated, for as long as I know, the Lascorz have always been related to Sobrarbe or at least the Province of Huesca. This is Aragon and not the basque country, not even Navarre. Also the point "the counts of Ribagorza, who were Lords of Lascorz in the 1100s" should be provided with sources, as it is interesting from the historical and toponymical view, because Lascorz still exists the present day as a small village in southern Ribagorza, and we'd like to know if there's any quotation of it's existance (of the village itself) before the 16th century. --Lascorz (talk) 18:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Basque family name
Talk:Flavius Paulus

message: As it stands, this article, without any source attributions, seems fairly novelesque.  Julian of Toledo's History of King Wamba is rabidly anti-Jewish, and equally rabidly anti-Paul, yet in all of the hostile epithets he hurls at Paul, he never accuses him of being an apostate, and while he accuses Gaul (Septimania), of having made itself "a whorehouse of the Jews blaspheming against our Savior and Lord" (p. 504 of the MGH edition), he says nothing about Jewish support for Paul's forces.  So Paul's conversion to Judaism, the Jewish uprising, asassinations, etc., seem like candidates for removal, along with the embassy to the Basques, etc.  --Isidorpax (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do we have any evidence Paul was Hispano-Roman? I'll delete the reference to him as Hispano-Roman until someone can come up with some contemporary evidence he was.  The fifth and sixth councils of Toledo over three decades before Paul's rebellion both listed being "Gothic" as a requirement for a legitimate king; Julian of Toledo, rabidly anti-Paul, doesn't say he wasn't Gothic.--Isidorpax (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Paul Hispano-Roman?
Talk:Francisco de Bobadilla

message: I included most of the Spanish version of the article, but with some changes.  First, I condensed the citations to Ferdinand Columbus' biography, and also made it clear that these were things he said rather than simply reporting them as objective fact.  The Spanish article makes no distinction in terms of sources between this biography and others.  I also removed a sentence whose only cite is the "Enciclopedia de Tarea," which is a "homework encyclopedia" whose site provides no information about where their information comes from.  It thus seemed unreliable.  That sentence discusses the encomienda system, and claims that Bobadilla perpetuated it and the resulting displacement of native populations.  Finally, I kept well-sourced information from the original article, including the bit describing Bobadilla's death.  I have not checked most of the citations, and so left their accessed dates alone.  Anything with a June 2020 date I did check.
Despite my account's age, I'm new to editing for the most part, only having attempted it a couple of times.  Feedback is of course welcome!  I also would welcome some prose cleanup, as I was hesitant in my translation to stray too far from the Spanish version's text out of fear of editorializing too much.  this name is also in use 17:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation
Talk:J. J. Jelincic

message: I'm a bit concerned that all the info in this article appears to come from [this biography page]. Does this person really meet WP:BIO?
-- 66.159.216.215 05:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: This is no reason for a speedy--speedy is for when you are altogether satisfied that there is no reasonable way   the person could be notable. It is not intended for when there is doubt. I am confident he is notable, and the article just needs more sources. Missing sources is not among the reasons for speedy. If you really think otherwise, please reread the CSD page. .  DGG 06:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: not a speedy
Talk:Fruela II of Asturias

message: The article now has a succession box at the bottom and a succession list within the infobox. In an article so short, is this level of unsourced repetition helpful? Srnec (talk) 01:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy
Talk:Aquila, Switzerland

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://hls-dhs-dss.ch/de/articles/002048/2021-03-05/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 12:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ardez

message: What are those ruins of? That should be explained. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruina chanoua
Talk:Isabel Pantoja

message: Should something be said about Encarna Sánchez? --Error (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Encarna

message: Politness is were you say thankyou and you're welcome  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.21.50 (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politness 
Talk:Sixty Million Dollar Man

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 08:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: The plot section for this movie is overly long and unnecessarily detailed, including facial features, expressions and lines of dialouge during particular scenes. The English is also of a below-average level. I edited the plot into something more presentable and moved the cast list to the bottom but user 203.11.134.217 reverted it. To avoid an edit war, can an admin please put his foot down and settle the matter? AceWhatever (talk) 06:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not an admin, but your actions are a step in the right direction, and certainly should not have been reverted without some sort of explanation in the the edit summary or here. I've reverted back to your version, and I'd advise a look at the style guidelines for further advice on how to improve the article. Good luck! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Much thanks for you assistance. I can't contribute more to the article since I haven't watched the movie. But I think we need to plan a contingency in case he/she reverts the changes. Whoever this person is they seem to be awfully one-track minded about the matter.AceWhatever (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wow! I realised there's many of the same two person editting this page. I just read the older version. The writer's command of english wasn't that good but I find the plot he or she wrote was pretty detail and accurate to the show. I just repost it back. Maybe someone can redit it with better command of english with lesser grammical errors?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.117.130.2 (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This isn't just a matter of bad grammar. There are far too many details that are unnecessary. This is a plot summary, not a scene-by-scene transcript. Plus the person doing the reverts is giving no justifications for his actions and went as far as to blank the talk page discussion. Unless you can provide a good reason for the presence of the superfluous text, they stay out. Also, please stop reverting to the older version because it removes the constructive additions to the infobox. AceWhatever (talk) 13:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot section needs fixing
Talk:Beinwil (Freiamt)

message: Is (Freiamt) part of the real-world name of this place, as opposed to being a WP disambiguator?. Certainly the article seems to be written that way. If so, I think an explanation as to why the village is named this way would be appropriate in the article. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: yes Freiamt is part of the official name. Take a look at the official municipal website from the info box. It's used in Switzerland to distinguish from other Beinwils in the country.  Freiamt comes from Freie Ämter, a region in Aargau that enjoyed a certain local autonomy during the Middle Ages.Tobyc75 (talk) 12:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Freiamt) 
Talk:XyMTeX

message: Is it not really opensource software! Read this:

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:16:29 +0900
From: Fujita Shinsaku <fujitas@chem.kit.ac.jp>
To: karl@tug.org (Karl Berry)
Subject: Re: XyMTeX licensing
Dear Dr. Berry
Thank you for your announcement on XyMTeX. 
Because XyMTeX has not been fully developed and should be 
equipped with other additional functions, 
I wish to restrict the disturibution within 
personal use and CTAN distribution. 
> If that is truly what you intend, then we will regretfully have to
> remove XyMTeX from TeX Live (and other free software distribution).  
So I think this conclusion would be inevitable under your policy. 
Sincerely Yours
Shinsaku Fujita
fujitas@chem.kit.ac.jp

Felipe.sanches 07:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Berneck, St. Gallen

message: It seems doubtful that the bear on the coat of arms is a visual pun on the name of Berneck, but rather a bear which is common on the flags in the area of St Gallen.
The only source of this "pun" theory seems to be the fotw site, which doesn't seem particularly authoritative.
Delete this sentence (and reference) perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.8.40.126 (talk) 13:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms a visual pun? 
Talk:Jordi Sabater Pi

message: He has died today (on 5 august 2009) at 87 years old ( Diari Avui).--KRLS (talk) 10:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Died 
Talk:José Echegaray

message: There's no clear consensus on Google.  It seems fairly evenly split between 4 September, 14 September and 15 September 1916.  My gut says that 15 Sept is a misreading for 14 Sep, so if we combine the 14 and 15 Sep cites, they far outweigh the 4 Sep cites.  That makes it 14 September 1916 for my money.  It's a bit rough, but it satisfies me. --  JackofOz (talk) 13:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, his obituary was published by the NYT on 16 September – .  --  JackofOz (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:Bowil

message: Behold! The least useful article ever!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.182.49 (talk) 07:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Defamiliarization

message: there are some problems with this article.
ostranenie is not an affect of the satirical, but meant to be a universal principal of art.  while dadaism and surrealism can be taken as examples of ostranenie, it is only because the method of their art is fairly overt.  additionally, ostranenie only distinguishes poetry from prose in the most formal, superficial manner; any application of literary technique (poetry and prose, ) involves a peculiar brand of ostranenie, in the preparation of the understanding towards the delineation of a subject and/or object.
отстранение is wrong.  while the (oт) prefix is allegory suitable for the hypothetical movement away from the readily-available Notion, the (o) prefix correctly describes the continuous aspect of the "movement" of estrangement. 
ostranenie (as described in Art as Technique) does not refer to a specific formal technique, but rather refers to all uses of technique.
----
the literary references chosen seem highly tangential without a great deal more exposition.
 links should also be added  Actio 06:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I first thought it might be better to merge this article in the distancing effect². However it seems that both differ by  defamiliarization being a technique of art (and especially literature) in general and the distancing effect just being a technique of theatre with both however having the same purpose. If that is the case I think it should be made clearer how those two differ in the article.
² btw this is one of the first wiki-articles that I better understood by the German article whose name is "Verfremdungseffekt" - I find "Alienation effect" (which was the name by which I found the English article) a truly misleading name for this: alienation always originates from the spectator so to say; however this is a technique used by the artists to have their play being perceived in another way. If it would just be called "alienation effect" it would have to just focus on the effects this kind of invoked alienation has for a spectator; and not on the technique which invoked it (the German translation for alienation would be Entfremdung; with Verfremdung being sth different).
--Fixuture (talk) 22:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How exactly does this differ from the distancing effect? 

message: Reading through this article, it seems that it may be better served by including an example of literary defamiliarization so as to help the reader better understand the subject. Does there exist any common example that could be included in the article? DeemDeem52 (talk) 00:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this?Omeganian (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples?
Talk:List of children of presidents of the United States

message: Is it ok if I restore the cropped version? It shows her face close-up and I think it more relatable to readers. (See this edit and this subsequent edit.) I think this last change was inadvertent... Shearonink (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the cropped one is better. MB 03:06, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Was your edit reverting it to the uncropped version accidental? DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 03:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  ...'s question is the question I was asking. Thanks. Shearonink (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I only meant to fix the date in the citation needed template. I don't know what happened. I just restored the cropped image. MB 04:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cropped version of the Harriet Lane photograph... 

message: I do not know how to edit tables, otherwise I would do it myself, but Amy Lynn Carter divorced her first husband, James Gregory Wentzel, and remarried to John Joseph "Jay" Kelly, so can someone add that 152.7.255.201 (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: —C.Fred (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amy Lynn Carter
Talk:Stockman (Australia)

message: If anyone want to learn about how WP:PRIMARYTOPIC considerations affect other page locations, this is an informative thread at the talk page for WP:RM: Wikipedia_talk:Requested_moves#Precedent.3F.  --Born2cycle (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and guess what, our anon IP friend is the one who appears to have started it and is spending much of their time over there...sigh.  Montanabw(talk) 22:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Also of interest
Talk:Capstone Software

message: Let's not forget "Beverly Hillbillies". I'm not sure if it was developed or just distributed by Capstone, but here's a video of it as proof https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ij-1Dp4PAVY  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.153.133 (talk) 02:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Red nucleus

message: The first section states "fine control of the fingers is not modified by the functioning of the red nucleus (rather it relies on the corticobulbar tract [CoBuTr])."
Cross-checking the article for cortico-bulbar tract gives information about the control of face, head, and neck muscles, while the article for corticospinal tract states that the corticospinal tract is for fine control of fingers/hands.
I'm just a first-year neuroscience grad student, so I didn't want to edit the content myself. I'll leave it up to the experts.
165.124.163.2 (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I like your changes so far.  Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fine motor control of hands...? possible error 

message: This section could be rewritten in order to make it more clear. It may be easier to separate the input portion, referring to them as afferent pathways, from the output portion, referring to them as efferent pathways. The way it is written now, readers who do not know what efferent pathways are may seem confused and may not realize that this is actually the output information. Shelbtrav (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Input and Output

message: The entire article, except for the image on the right, implies that there is one nucleus rather than two nuclei. The title and the article should be edited to reflect "red nuclei". User:Shinju (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Red nuclei
Talk:Serial binary adder

message: I saw there is an article very similar, in name, to the one i just wrote but a completely different look at it. Serial Number Arithmetic.  My article is the addition block and the other is the algorithmic implementation, and usage for serial com.  so the are very different in context but essentially the same concept should they merge of should the other one be more specifically named, i dont know  ZyMOS 06:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vatsa

message: Wrong map
::The map given of the Vatsa Kingdom is wrong. It denotes it to be much south west than it was. The vatsa referred to the Lower Doab area.(Awadhi (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Avalon: Web of Magic

message: Feel free to share any info available on The Avalon Collection by Rachel Roberts.
I am a very busy college student and any help is greatly appreciated. I am slowly adding to the page when I have time.
SunStar85 06:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It's practically like a re-imagined remake. Even titles are the same, like Full Circle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.234.60.154 (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it related to the Jewel Riders (90s cartoon)? 

message: Also one would list the connections with the Jewel Riders universe. --Asperchu (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't it be rather called now "Avalon series" or something?  

message: However it's of course still accessible through history in case if someone would like to use them in some wikia or otherwise in Wikipedia (in this or some other articles) or whatever. Also a clean-up, but someone needs to provide some content for the reception section. --Asperchu (talk) 17:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm going to remove the large creatures section (trivia) 
Talk:Sex and sexuality in speculative fiction/Archive 1

message: I went ahead and removed Kenji Siratori's Blood Electric from the list of SF lit. There was no explanation as to why it merited inclusion, and on visiting: Siratori's homepage, Creation Books (publisher)'s homepage, AND the Amazon book page I was utterly unable to figure out what this book was about much less how it pioneers sexual themes in SF. If someone wants this included, please at least include a comment to explain its notability. Kit 10:02, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed [[Blood Electric]]

message: Just dropped in from a couple doors down (Science fiction, no sex) and wonder why Philip Jose Farmer's 1952/1961 (magazine/book pub.) novel isn't on the list. It's literally the textbook example of a story that foregrounds sex--and that was considered over the edge in its time. RLetson 00:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Lovers?
Talk:Juan Rodríguez de Fonseca

message: In article is said that his grave is in the Church of Santa María la Mayor en Coca in Segovia,
But on the picture is his grave with explanation that the grave is in  Collegiate church of Santa María la Mayor in Toro, province of Zamora.
After checking some sources it looks that the 1st place (Coca) is right.
Could someone to correct it, please ?
86.9.12.51 (talk) 00:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  error: place of Grave of Fonseca