lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Taishi Ci

message: several thousand? i thought it was 3000
I couldn't remember the exact number, I knew it was a smaller force in the thousands, between about 2000 and 6000 troops, but I didn't want to specify an exact number which may turn out to be incorrect.  If you're absolutely positive of the exact number, please feel free to alter it. Gamer Junkie 14:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mr. Fish

message: I can find no reference online, or in any materials about Bill Mantlo, to a UK-born drug-addicted sex-offender friend by the name of Luke Fish; furthermore, since the edit was made by a frequent vandal, I think its veracity is doubtful.  Unless someone can provide some kind of non-wiki citation, I am removing the "Luke Fish" section from the text.
This article seems to be frequently vandalized due to the "Seanbaby" phenomenon, and I would like to remind pranksters that their edits not only harm this article, but Wikipedia as a whole. Anonymoustom 13:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Luke Fish
Talk:2005–06 NCAA football bowl games

message: Please do not put any "gambling" information on these games.  They are needless info and will be deleted. NoseNuggets 12:21 US EST Dec 29 2005.
I have, as one will have apprehended, been reverting NoseNuggets' deletions of the spread/over-under statistics that I have given in each game summary I have written.  Inasmuch as such information provides one with a better picture of the expected result of a given game, and in view of its inclusion in sundry encyclopedias referencing college games, most notably the new Sports Illustrated Complete History of College Football, I believe such information  is appropriate and relevant.  Surely if a consensus develops to the contrary, I will gladly accede to the wishes of the majority, but I am disinclined to take NoseNuggets' contentions as dispositive, not least because the other susbtantive edits he has made to the page have been puerile (e.g., in his description of the Alamo Bowl) or non-standard (e.g., in his use of less-than-encyclopedic grammar and syntax).  I will thank everyone in advance for his/her views on the subject.  Cordially Joe 22:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ute

message: The discussion of the "ute" motor vehicle is growing, and can grow a lot more, so should probably be lifted off the disambiguation page and spun into an article in its own right. I'm not quite sure of the best way to do this  - can someone else handle it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian Page (talk • contribs) 05:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been done. See Utility_vehicle and Coupe utility, which cover both meanings of Aussie term "ute".--Ddgonzal 23:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

message: The link that leads to Utilty Vehicle claims that the "ute" was invented in Australia, without backing it up, or any links to where this "fact" came from.220.239.162.44 (talk) 08:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian? 
Talk:Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.

message: A lot of information can be added to this page.  For example, there is no discussion of the opinion that the Federal Circuit issued for the case upon remand from the Supreme Court.  The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, issued the opinion to clarify and to "fill in the gaps" of the Supreme Court's opinion.  In addition, there is no mention of the particular facts of this case.  Also, it wouldn't hurt to include a few sentences explaining where the Supreme Court adopted its "unforeseeable" exception to the complete surrender presumption.  Believing that the D of E exists primarily to deal with after-arising technology, Justice Rader of the Federal Circuit had for some time prior to the Supreme Court's opinion argued for a foreseeability standard for prosecution history estoppel.  RandomWalker 05:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I do :-p...filled in a bit more, will continue to work on it. Cquan (after the beep...) 22:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Should there be any attempt in Wikipedia to make articles like this understandable to a layman?  As the article is currently written, I think only patent lawyers can understand it.  For example, who won?  Not being a patent lawyer, I can't even tell from the article whether Festo or SMC won at the Supreme Court.  --Westwind273 (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understandable? 
Talk:Mark Rathbun

message: The link for footnote #29 is broken and results in an html 404 error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.207.36 (talk) 22:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced the  dead URL with an archived URL. (Edited because footnote numbers have changed since the original talk page post). Matuko (talk) 17:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  footnote #29 

message: There was a change around 2016/2017 in domain name. Same website, just diff URL. That is important when you're trying to locate old (dead link) pages in the Wayback Machine. Prior to the change, it was markrathbun.wordpress.com, and after it was markrathbun.blog. And especially since Marty 'turned' around that time and deleted some pages (like his About Me page). Just try both URL styles when searching in the Wayback Machine. Grorp (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marty's blog URL
Talk:Ephraim

message: "...: Steven, ... "
: what?  Steven?  Seriously? What a disaster, but I'm at least taking that silliness out.  71.82.157.201 (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ephraim had sons 

message: When we talk about Ephraim my little understanding i though that Ephriam was the useless son of Joseph, that why Joseph was confuse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.215.21.82 (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ephriam 

message: There are many examples of multiple people having the same name. There is no evidence to suggest that 2 Chronicles 7:27 is referring to the man who lead Israel during the conquest of Canaan. (I'm not saying that he is not, I am saying that the assertion made within the Wikipedia article cannot be substantiated and the citation does not assert that.) Itinerantlife (talk) 02:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jehoshua (2 Chronicles 7:27)
Talk:Grind Line

message: The term "The Grind Line" was not invented by Bowman, or even Detroit. The term dates back to the seventies. There have been several so-named "grind lines" on multiple teams since. The term needs to be more generically defined, rather than pinned directly to Bowman/Red Wings. Caulfield14 20:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs serious cleanup
Talk:Icingdeath

message: Icingdeath refers to the dragon, after whom Drizzt's sword is named. The article should therefore redirect to the dragon, or exist as it's own.
Jabencarsey 05:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dragon

message: Do we really need this page? There's hardly any text, so you could just put it under Drizzt. Same with Twinkle's page.
Mwsilvabreen 23:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  page 

message: Who ever keeps undoing the merge suggestion, stop! That's what it is. a suggestion, so lets talk about it. Mwsilvabreen 23:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversions 

message: OK, I think we should merge the two pages because, 1)They don't have enough information to stand alone (come to think of it we should put a D and D stub tag on the pages) 2) they both belong to Drizzt, so most of the information we have about them has been talked about with them together 3) Other related characters Have pages together like Ivan and Pikel Bouldershoulders' page. Mwsilvabreen 21:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reviewing all three talk pages, there has been one "no" vote, while the rest of us concur that the pages should be merged. My idea is to have a page entitled Drizzt Do'Urden's weapons. Any objection to this? Turlo Lomon 06:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I have already started working on a merged, cleaned up article for everyones consideration before setting up redirects, etc. Don't like the name? I can respect that. Do you have any suggestions on what would be a better name?  Click on the link above.  That is the article currently under revision. It can always be moved, deleted, renamed, whatever. Turlo Lomon 07:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Twinkle (scimitar)

message: So whats the value of having all the same info here as in the Drizzt article? kinda odd...
Jabencarsey 05:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Reviewing all three talk pages, there has been one "no" vote, while the rest of us concur that the pages should be merged. My idea is to have a page entitled Drizzt Do'Urden's weapons. Any objection to this? Turlo Lomon 06:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Sangaria (soft drink)

message: Someone with fluency in Japanese can study the official Sangaria website and add more to the article. I and many others I'm sure, would appreciate that. Thanks. --Shultz 05:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: Anyone have a source for the claimed origin of the name? I always think of "Sangría" when I see the name. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 15:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: Probably a stupid question but it's bugging me anyway: is the サンガリア-flavored Ramune the same thing as this? -84.239.157.217 14:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ramune?

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Godgifu (daughter of Æthelred the Unready)

message: Didn't she marry Eustace in 1035, after Drogo's death? Srnec 05:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Anglo/Saxon Chronicle records Eustace the first was to marry Godiva, murdered villagers then lied to Edward regarding the circumstances. Godwin was told to punish the villagers but refused after finding the truth which brought about the Revolt of the Earls.  Eustace's deceit was finally exposed as he died around 1049, Godwin and his sons were given back their lands and earl Siward marries Godiva/Godgifu. Lowell C Armstrong (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage to Eustace ll ??
Talk:Phaser (Star Trek)

message: :E pluribus anthony, why did you remove them? Flea110 06:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, sorry ... an oversight! E Pluribus Anthony 06:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So you are okay with putting them back? Flea110 00:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Before doing so, I think they should be formatted into a table and copyedited.  There should also be a proviso that they apply only to TNG phasers, as later ones store more charge and are arguably more powerful (ergo, able to vapourise more rock, etc.)  Perhaps you should place them here, then we can format, and finally place them in the article?  E Pluribus Anthony 00:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. However, please keep in mind that I'm relatively unfamiliar with complex editing so I may not be of as much help as I'd like to be. Flea110 06:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great!  Don't worry: I'm a little more familiar and will attend assist shortly. E Pluribus Anthony 06:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why were the phaser power settings removed?

message: * I know I did something wrong, as Strait so kindly pointed out, how am I supposed to fix up the section? The King's Soldier 03:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Back Ground Section-Firepower

message: I'm all for a merge; actually, I've never heard of a "phaser receiver" and, arguably, that article should be nixed instead. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 20:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is NO online or other mention of this and, thus, doesn't belong in the article.  Until you can provide a reference corroborating this ... E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 18:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, or nix, [[phaser receiver]]? 

message: My problem with the table:
I thought there was a "kill" setting - 
"Disruptors" disrupt, phasers attack w/ "phased" energy...
"Kill" is probably an informal term for Setting 7, which will kill (but not 'phazorize') ordinary organic beings. The order 'set phasers to kill' would be understood by Starfleet personnell as Setting 7, or whatever setting is equivalent to it on a less powerful or more powerful model of phaser. --JaceCady 15:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  set phazers to 

message: I do believe that Types I, II and III Phasers were used in The Original Series (TOS).  The current writing of this section seems to ignore that Type I , II and III designations were used in the original series and the nicknames specifically refer to the nicknames from TNG. Daroldhiga 22:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types
Talk:Jennifer Garner Affleck

message: The article states that she changed her surname from Garner to Affleck.  Wouldn't that make her name, "Jennifer Affleck", not "Jennifer Garner Affleck"?  Did she also add a middle name?  Also, where is the citation for this (I'm assuming one will be easy to find)?  --Yamla 06:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name
Talk:Angu

message: In the sentence about J. K. McCarthy's book, I replaced the word "describe" with "described". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.29.66.88 (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  typo 

message: List of ethnic groups mentions some Anga which, of today, refers only to the ancient Indian state. Is it about Angu?--Shanghainese.ua (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anga? 

message: I don't think this film series is from 1976. I believe it's actually 1996, and someone accidentally said it was 1976 because of a reference to the 1976 Copyright Act. But the video itself says 1996, and I probably wouldn't expect that level of video quality from a portable camera in the 70s.
Also, I get the impression that the series was totally faked. Not an expert here, but this seems pretty convincing: http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4840/is-the-tribe-meets-white-man-for-the-first-time-video-fake 24.24.129.249 (talk) 05:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Jean-Pierre Dutilleux series 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  15:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Angu →  – No opinion. Other user's request. - Altenmann >talk 16:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Leaning Oppose. With usage virtually neck-and-neck, and Angu leading in recent years apart from the latest, I'm not seeing a strong case for moving.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 October 2023
Talk:The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie

message: The infobox says the film is in English yet it apparently won an Oscar as a foreign language film. Anybody actually seen it and know what language it's in? French, probably? Matt Gies 06:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw it in the 1970s. It is in French (and Spanish?). I don't remember Spanish, but it is possible.  Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just saw it. It's a great movie. I think there were really only a few lines in Spanish said by one of the characters that would be lines everybody in France would know. (Like "Vamos, muchacha"). I think it should be said that it is completely in French. --Syxed 07:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: The lead contained a direct quote from a user-submitted plot summary hosted on imdb.  I've removed it.  We shouldn't even be citing such items at all, and certainly not in the lead. --Tony Sidaway 22:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary from imdb

message: They bristle, and politely express their outrage, but they never stop trying; they relentlessly expect and pursue all that they desire, as though it were their natural right to have others serve and pamper them. He exposes their sense of entitlement, their hypocrisy, and their corruption. -- What justifies this language, which appears to be the opinion of an editor? -- Jibal (talk) 19:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lede reads like a review
Talk:Captain Nazi

message: Well it possible that Nazi is dead. Cause the goggles that he wore would have to be connected to his brain and that electrical shock would send his brain hey wire at least if not dead. 24.70.95.203 07:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: If he's invulnerable how can he die?

message: This page has been edited back and forth regarding Captain Nazi's death. For awhile the article even stated that he was "seemingly" killed in the "apparent" event of his death. Let's face it; Captain Nazi is a third-string villain in the DC Universe, and such characters (not to mention more important ones) have been dropping like flies lately, especially in the events surrounding Infinite Crisis. Almost every superhero comic character's death is tentative at best, but until we see some harder evidence than "But he's too tough for that," we should assume he's dead and not add all of these "...but he might not really be dead" clauses to the article.
--Halloween jack 20:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert battles over death

message: I took out this :
"(Note: In George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Thought Police agent O'Brien states that "Big Brother cannot die, for he is the manifestation of The Party, and the Party will never die".)"
There are plenty of comic book characters who are the "spirit" or "embodiment" of a particular concept or group, dating back before 1948. DC's Uncle Sam, for instance. So this particular character's latest retconned undeath probably isn't a 1984 reference, just unoriginal writing. Noclevername (talk) 07:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: He's not Nazi, he's my Brother

message: Just wanted to inform everyone that I fixed a link error on the page, near the bottom of the second-to-last paragraph with the DC Comics section.  The page linked to Khandaq - a battle also known as the Battle of the Trench, not Kahndaq - an in-universe fictional country - like it should have.  I thought it polite to inform everyone of the change I have made.  -- Somarinoa (talk) 03:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Alteration 
Talk:Black Mountain (Milpitas, California)

message: I moved this article to Black Mountain (California) (Diablo Range) because I wanted to write about another Black Mountain, also in Santa Clara County. Unfortunately it turns out that there's another Black Mountain in the Diablo Range, down by San Benito . Anyone have any ideas where the article for the one near Milpitas should go?  Maybe just Black Mountain (near Milpitas)? --Trovatore 07:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would usually see people using either Black Mountain (milpitas) or Black Mountain, Milpitas. I'd use the latter. If your writing about the other Black Mount. in the Diablo range how about Black Mountain (NEAR San Benito) Near would be optional. Andrew Northall 07:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article
Talk:Switcharound

message: I've boldly redirected all three of these novels to the author page per: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The One Hundredth Thing About Caroline. I'm certain each of these pages could be recreated, so long as reliable secondary sources be applied. BusterD (talk) 14:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  As a result of a deletion discussion
Talk:Toasted TV

message: Why is the stub biorgraphical?  Ozone 07:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know her age and birthdate?--Huntercool (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How old is Pip Russell? 

message: Please take a look at the article for one of this show's segments, Chuck It In‎. It may merit a merge in to this one. Thank you, VanTucky 04:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related article 

message: From now on, can we have people updating the episode count. That'll be great. 124.188.180.129 (talk) 09:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated episode numbers 
Talk:Red Lion and Sun Society

message: The red cross, red crescent, Magen David Adom and others are scattered all over. It should be massivly merged, this and other titles.
XonoX 16:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, this should be kept separate so that it can be categorised in the Iran menu to improve access to the information. CalJW 15:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass Merging
Talk:Victor-class submarine

message: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200609071552.htm
Seems to refer to K-414 Daniil Moskovskij. This sub isn't listed in the article?
See Soviet submarine K-414 Daniil Moskovsky. κаллэмакс 17:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another sub in V-III ? 

message: "Speculation immediately mounted that the pod was the housing for some sort of exotic silent propulsion system, possibly a Magnetohydrodynamic drive unit." Should have a reference. I can agree that it probably gave peopel fits wondering what it was. But mentioning Magnetohydrodynamic drive unit without a reference make me think someone is influenced here by the movie and book Hunt For Red October
Wfoj2 (talk) 01:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation on pod on upper rudder 