Talk:Hallmark

message: Hey i think this page should re-direct to Hallmark, the card company. I think ppl are more likely to be looking for the company thn the precius metal stamp. what do u think? Paco8191 23:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should direct elswere 

message: something that would be useful to include in this article would be a table of date codes, or something similar.
I found a website which lists these; but I do not know haw to make tables, so I would apreciate it if someone else could do it for me and tell me how to make tables please
thanks Stwalkerster 16:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something Useful 

message: Anyone else think this looks a bit sloppy?
::Merriam-Webster also defines the metaphorical use of hallmark as: "a distinguishing characteristic, trait, or feature <the dramatic flourishes which are the hallmark of the trial lawyer — Marion K. Sanders>".
For one thing, I don't think people using 'hallmark' in this sense are using markings on metal objects as a metaphor- They're just using the term in another, also well-established sense. For another, why quote Webster's dictionary (and Marion Saunders?)--Eloil 20:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: replaced websters link w/ wiktionary. --Eloil 21:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dictionary quote 

message: Responsibility marks are mentioned but not well-explained nor illustrated. -- Beland 15:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Responsibility marks 

message: Older than France here in the history section? Ie Byzantine system oldest in Europe.Eugene-elgato (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Byzantium

message: Would anyone be interested in helping to set up a WikiProject Silverware? I'm interested in salvers, coffee pots, jugs, candlesticks, famous silversmiths, different styles, etc. Thanks. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 11:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting up WikiProject Silverware? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hallmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070409074854/http://www.ezv.admin.ch/ezv/00433/index.html?lang=fr to http://www.ezv.admin.ch/ezv/00433/index.html?lang=fr
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a "clarification needed" marker on the phrase "12 to 13 lots (75% to 81%) for silver."
An explanation is provided on page 493 of "Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide" (Frank Anthony Carl Mantello, A. G. Rigg, editors): "... in Germany pure silver was said to be 16 lots (lotions) fine." Under that system, silver of "12 lots fineness" would be 75% elemental silver and 25% other metals.
I wonder if this information should be added to the entry on Fineness?
Mcavalletto (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  On "lots" as a fineness measure for silver 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hallmark Cards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 22:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion