Talk:Bamyan

message: Bamyan is actually a town/village, not really city. I think the title of this article should be changed accordingly. User:Beh-nam 22:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bamyan is not a city and is not called Bamyan city. It is simply referred to as Bamyan. While the province is called Bamyan Province. Behnam 04:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  City or Town? 

message: There appears to be some ambiguity near the bottom of the page in the description of the statues.  It is common knowledge that the Taliban destroyed the two statues standing in their rock niches, however the article clearly refers to "three" statues with no sound description of the third - in fact, the article would seem to read as though there are two ("4000 feet apart").  I have read a recent account which refers to two teams of archeologists, one French and the other Japanese.  These teams are apparently looking for the third statue, which may have been lost but is described as being 1000 feet long, and perhaps buried in the valley.  I have linked to the news article in this post - it is, in fact, an article about the oil paintings in the caves.  Rather than simply edit the article carelessly, I propose a discussion about the topic and perhaps a method of verifying this further information discovered.  Thank you.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7508917.stm
Metallhd (talk) 19:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statue count 

message: The New York Times recently highlighted the irresponsible actions of some editors of the Wikipedia.
Even if the present editor is a learned writer he has no right to elbow out the views of other writers. Ranajit Pal’s view that Buddhism rose near Bamiyan, not Nepal has been deleted due to the ignorance of the editor who should remember that the readers have as much right to true knowledge as the editor. Pal’s view has been published in a book (Non-Jonesian Indology and Alexander) which has been acclaimed in two respected review Journals and  -  and has also been accepted by learned scholars such as the late Prof. N. G. L. Hammond, (editor of the Cambridge Ancient History, The Oxford Classical Dictionary and discoverer of Vergina) Thomas McEvilley and many others. This is undemocratic and deplorable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejda (talk • contribs) 06:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor or Brigand? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 31 October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bamian valley.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bamyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128162824/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070126/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan to http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/208
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the introduction, the following sentence appears: " It was a place where East met West and its archaeology reveals a blend of Greek, Turkish, Persian, Chinese and Indian influence." Fine. But where in the actual article is there any mention of Greek influence, Alexander, etc? There really ought to be a discussion of ancient Greece and its interaction with Bamyan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isoruku (talk • contribs) 20:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greece 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bamyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111515/http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/ to http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111515/http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/ to http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* Afghanistan, testa, da bamiyan, grotta G, VI-VII sec..JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: "The city of Bamyan was part of the Kushan Empire in the early centuries of the Christian era."
I think there is no need for that "Christian era". This sentence should be rephrased. What do you all think? Hitesh0630 (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of the history section