lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Portobello Road Market

message: This article says that antiques dealers arrived in the market in the 1960s.  The "Portobello Road" song in Bedknobs and Broomsticks, which takes place during World War II, has plenty of references to (pseudo-)antiques: "street where the riches of ages are sold" ("stowed"? I don't remember; it's been years); "a pen used by Shelley, a new Boticelli"; &c. If the antiques dealers' arrival in the '60s is confirmed, we should point out that anachronism in the movie. President Lethe 18:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anachronism?

message: This article has very little about the market itself, instead listing trivia about the geography of the road.  The road has its own article, so I am moving some of this stuff which is totally unrelated the market. Chrisfow 02:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Road's Incline
Talk:Hugh IX of Lusignan

message: I wanted to start this entry in order to fill in the genealogy. I haven't made a succession box, because I haven't yet found out what happened to the County of Marche between 1165 and 1203. No doubt someone else can help. Andrew Dalby http://perso.wanadoo.fr/dalby/ 18:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, Who's Who in Early Medieval England, and the Penguin Historical Atlas of the Medieval World, it was Hugh IX who was engaged to Isabella of Angouleme when she was persuaded to marry King John instead (Penguin says she was "abducted").  Also according to the Encyclopedia, Isabella married Hugh X (son of Hugh IX) after John's death.Beee3 (talk) 18:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification re Engagement to Isabella of Angouleme 

message: (If this is a sensitive topic the result of the discussion might be better left in the disussion section ? However translation of the nickname into english seems to put this in a position to need a bit of clarification, just from the standpoint of "social history".) I have spent some time looking for whether or not le Brun (in so many generations of the men of this family) means that they were negro/Moore/Blakamoore... In gen 6 there was a wife who may have been muslim (Sarazine/Sarafine de Lezay), this may be how we get le brun, but my research seems to say she was just another french woman whose origins got lost to time and that le brun comes from somewhere else. John5Russell3Finley (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  le Brun 

message: Who, exactly, has "deduced" that Hugh X cannot have been the son of Mathilde? First cousin marriages happened all the time in the Middle Ages - you just needed a dispensation. john k (talk) 13:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deduced
Talk:Hugh VIII of Lusignan

message: I wanted to start this entry in order to fill in the genealogy. I haven't made a succession box, because I haven't yet found out what happened to the County of Marche between 1165 and 1203. No doubt someone else can help. Andrew Dalby http://perso.wanadoo.fr/dalby/ 18:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hinduism in South Africa

message: needs a culture section--Dangerous-Boy 07:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  culture 

message: Is there any evidence for the assertion that indentured preferred to remain in their adopted counteries out of caste discrimination in India. If that was so, why not change the religion itself instead of immigrating to far away places ?
Septa sequera 07:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  history
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Nominations

message: If anyone is interested, please add to or update this list as you like. Maurreen 18:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rough to-do list

message: OK, maybe I'm blind or you guys are more technical than I am. I don't see how to remove the following from the main V1Q page.
*Featured content:
*Featured articles 
*Featured pictures 
*Featured lists 
*Featured portals 
*Featured article tools:
*What is a featured article? 
*Featured article candidates 
*Featured article removal candidates 
*Featured article log 
*Featured article statistics 
*Featured article review 
*Main Page FAs 
*Former featured articles 
:Maurreen 17:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done.  It was mostly in a template like our WP1.0 nav-box.  If you want to remove the right hand section that can be done too, but I think it would be good to put in related stuff as in FAC.  Also, we will want to put the WP1.0 Navigation box somewhere. Walkerma 18:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Maurreen 17:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FA stuff
Talk:Riparian buffer zones

message: this seems like a logical merge since the two articles address the same phenomena. i would propose thoughtful integration of the two articles and being sure to incorporate all the references from Riparian buffer zones to the surviving article. i would propose that the surviving article name be riparian zone since over a hundred articles link there, whereas only one artcle page links to Riparian buffer zones. Anlace 18:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merger
Talk:Richland Center, Wisconsin

message: What is the main stream or river that runs through the town?64.53.191.77 (talk) 22:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Waterway
Talk:Teri Polo

message: I think we ought to delete the image of the Playboy magazine cover. The article is too short to warrant two images. The Playboy image is offensive to many, including myself. It was disturbing for me to come across that image while looking up an actress from the West Wing. Pied beauty 15:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored, see Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored. However the image still has to serve a purpose. --Oden 17:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The playboy spread should at least be mentioned! --Daysleeper47 05:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: After Oden made the comment above, they provided a fair use rationale for this article's use of the Playboy cover which I agree with. —MJBurrage • TALK • 07:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playboy Cover 

message: Does anyone have a good source for the category? JackO'Lantern 18:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian?

message: We know Teri was born in 1969 but, was she born on June 1st or August 29th?  Hotwine8 (talk) 15:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a source showing Teri's birthdate as being June 1, 1969.  161.77.227.47 (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is unfortunately not a reliable source and so we can't use it. Jorm (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 1 or August 29? 

message: Teri does not have a spouse therefore I'm going to remove her boyfriend's name from that section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.134.130 (talk) 16:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse 

message: does she have any tattoos or are those pictures of them fake? Tj21 (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tattoos? 
Talk:Double Action / Single Action

message: The last paragraph in Double action contradicts a large part of this article. Seano1 18:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I've been reverted.  Nobodoy complained, and yet sombebody went through and reverted alot of work I did to merge several duplicate articles under one heading.  How a trigger works is one article, not seven separate, disjointed, and contradictory sub-articles.  They should all redirect to trigger (firearms).  If you read that article, there is nothing missing from it.  To understand trigger mechanisms, you have to put them in context of other mechanisms.--Asams10 20:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Ken Marino

message: Beside the obvious, does anyone have a source? JackO'Lantern 18:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian?

message: Many of the projects he's worked on seemed to also involve members of The State comedy troupe. Should a section of the article be devoted to that? RahadyanS 03:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The State, and after

message: I'm sure that i am not the first who noticed how much Ken looks like the Baldwin brothers. It makes me wonder if there is a certain family secret here, considering that not only does look Ken like a Baldwin, both Ken and the Baldwin brothers are from Long Island. And West Islip isn't too far from Massapequa, where the baldwins were born. Google Maps directions
--2601:8:A900:824:291F:819F:FB5B:3038 (talk) 06:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ken... Baldwin ?
Talk:Limbo (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I don't know if anyone agrees with me (or even cares), but I think that this article should be moved to Limbo (Dungeons & Dragons). Aside from "plane" being an ambiguous descriptor (for example, is it a type of airplane?), things that relate to something larger (such as an element of an RPG) are generally categorized by what they relate to, not what they are. For example, the town from Family Guy is listed as Quahog (Family Guy), not Quahog (fictional town). -- Kicking222 18:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the use of the plane of limbo is not specifically limited to Dungeons and Dragons. It is a feature of several different role playing games and thus shouldn't be specifically linked to just one. Enigmatical 22:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up. I was unaware of this, and I think it would certainly be beneficial to add to this article info on other games which use the plane. At this point, however, I still think that the article should be moved if it is to reference D&D alone. Of course, it's not as if I'm simply going to move it on my own, anyway. -- Kicking222 00:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thoughts, having looked at the limbo (disambiguation) page and the content of this page itself it does actually appear as if the article is based on the Dungeons and Dragons specific use of limbo. In that context perhaps it should be moved to the article you suggest. Enigmatical 01:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Limbo moved to Dungeons and Dragons
Talk:Abomination: The Nemesis Project

message: I was one of the original developers of this game - so if you want any info, ask away.
RenesisX 00:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've been trying to get hold of at least a demo of this game, although I'm finding that it seems to have issues with newer operating systems such as Windows XP. I am aware that I am not alone in this. Worth mentioning that some sort of patch is required to play the game these days?
I just installed the game on XP (SP2) and it ran fine, although I also installed the 2.7 patch right away. --89.14.171.109 10:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Still Comptable?
Talk:Koinonia

message: I created this page because there was no page titled "Koinonia" but there was one titled "Koininia", which looks to me like a typographical error. So, I copied all the text across from the "Koininia" page, including the "Merge" flag. Someone with ADMIN powers, please delete the "Koininia" page. I have no objection to the suggested MERGE. 
Tzf 18:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The entire original article, since it was lacking references, had the appearance of original research. I just added a section with several verifiable references, but the larger original section is still lacking any citations. What I've already done is a major edit. Would it be ok to edit the previous section itself in order to bring it into better compliance with the verifiable reference requirement? If someone with a little more Wikipedia experience could offer me some guidance, that would be appreciated. --LovedByYesu 19:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research

message: Added link to Koinonia Foundation and moved the links to the Koinonia band and Koinonia Partners to "external links" section. 141.156.34.239 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additon and format 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.enginesofinnovation.com/How_the_Greeks_Created_the_First_Age_of_Innovation_V1.3.doc. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rachael Bella

message: Aside from the obvious, is there a good source for that? JackO'Lantern 18:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Italian?

message: The article is too reliant on the subject's own sources and IMDb for references to her films. WP:SECONDARY sources are to be preferred. The films themselves may also be listed as references, along with the time index for when the subject's name appears in the end credits. The films should receive these citations before the template is removed, as we need more than just her word or IMDb's for it. Regards,  Spintendo  04:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP primary sources maintenance tags 1-4-2020
Talk:Babyz

message: The babyz community is improving this article to provide information for people and we hope to post a few links.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurluh (talk • contribs) 06:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Links and Resources 

message: A large amount of this article is non-notable and should be removed. The so-called "notable" individuals in the community and the level of detail it goes into the modding and/or fan community for this game should probably be excised unless actual sources can be provided beside these fan sites themselves. 8.18.38.105 (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Once Upon a Time (Simple Minds album)

message: I've changed the (not rated) to (positive) on Rolling Stone's review listing to give people a clearer picture, since the main Simple Minds song makes it clear the album was critically well-received, and I remember reading this review before it became a dead link.Laydsb (talk) 21:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Category talk:Scottish spies

message: The :Category:English spies inlcudes only spies from before the Act of Union, and states that all spies after thet should be in :Category:British spies. Wouldn't it make sense to mirror this for Scottish spies and move the admirable Pinkerton etc to the British sections? The artilce , of course, will discuss their nationality. Epeeist smudge 18:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taikyoku

message: Content was merged from Taikyoku Shodan and Taikyoku shodan.  Mangojuice 18:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merging

message: "The second kata of the series, taikyoku nidan, is nearly identical to taikyoku shodan, except that the punches up and down the middle are at jodan (high) level."
Just want to know if it only in shotokan karate, however we do Nidan with rising blocks except for the short turns up and down the I, not sure if i should write it as though all styles are like this or only shotokan
:Well, in my system we don't do it that way.  So, the question is, do any other styles do it that way, or only shotokan?  Mangojuicetalk 12:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taikyoku Nidan 

message: At Taiji, it says that this is the Japanese cognate of the Chinese concept... Which is clearly not the case, unless there should be another article name for this? 132.205.44.5 (talk) 03:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you clarify what you are trying to say? User5802 (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiji

message: In the intro, it is noted that the Taikyoku series were introduced by Gichin Funakoshi. I was initially confused because I knew that it was developed by Yoshitaka Funakoshi. According to 1.1 though, it was indeed developed by Yoshitaka and it notes that Gichin "named" it. I've changed the intro to add that Yoshitaka did develop them so that it's clear to readers immediately as to who created the series, and I'm assuming that the preexisting information claiming that Gichin introduced the series into the system after they were developed is still correct. - YoshiroShin (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The developer of Taikyoku
Talk:Chameleon Twist 2

message: I don't know who is he either. He did not credit NEITHER Bomberman Second Attack or Chameleon Twist 2. Both games' soundtrack DON'T resemble each other. According to credits, the composer is Koichi Fujiwara.
And - no, there is no filials of Hudson Soft nor Sunsoft based in Russia. 188.35.131.172 (talk) 11:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who the hell is Bulat Hajiyew? 

message: 1. Being Developed by Toshiba Miramax Communications, Japan System Supply and Toei Animation Like Nebulus 2: Pogo-A-Go-Go and Sailor Moon.
2. Being Published by SunSoft Like Ikki.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6EF1:57D0:91B9:256B:79BD:73F1 (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How It Looks Like Being Allergic to Getting Became?
Talk:Garamba National Park

message: On behalf of African Parks via the Wyss Foundation, and as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I am submitting an expanded and updated draft of this article for community review. You can view my proposed draft here. 
Souring in the current article is limited: there are just 3 references used as inline citations, one being the Daily Mail, is no longer considered a reliable source by the Wikipedia community. To strengthen this article, I've worked to create a draft with improved sourcing that provides an accurate, neutral, and well-rounded overview of the park, including its wildlife and history, similar to articles for other parks and protected areas. African Parks has provided feedback to ensure accuracy. I'm looking for a volunteer editor who is willing to review the draft and copy over content appropriately to the live article. I hope anyone reviewing will conclude that the proposed draft is an improvement over the existing article.
 You've been very helpful with reviewing drafts I've proposed for other national parks in Africa, and I wanted to bring this one to your attention as well, if you're interested. This is the last article about a national park within the scope of this project. After this, I only have an improved African Parks article to share.
As a reminder, this edit request is part of a series to create and expand several Wikipedia articles related to African Parks. You can learn more here: User:Inkian Jason/African Parks. Thank you. Inkian Jason (talk) 01:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good and article updated with suggested draft. Chetsford (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks once again for your help. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Draft article

message: Thanks for adding the "African Parks (organisation)" category. Do you mind fixing the red link here? Inkian Jason (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Inkian Jason (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

text: . I knew I must have done that somewhere, given how many times I had to correct myself on other pages. Now I know where.  Sorry about the edit summaries, the guidelines require I provide all of that information. Hopefully, you didn't get pinged for each one (or otherwise it collapsed them all into one notification). Please let me know if there's anything else you need. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category
Talk:Okinawa woodpecker

message: Is this the same thing as a yanbaru kuina? Turly-burly 18:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The Yanbaru kuina is the Okinawa rail.--5.249.14.10 (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{Done}}

message: Consider the following abstract from the article On the phylogenetic position of the Okinawa woodpecker by Hans Winkler, Nobuhiko Kotaka, Anita Gamauf, Franziska Nittinger, and Elisabeth Haring in the Journal of Ornithology:
The Okinawa woodpecker Sapheopipo noguchii is the rarest extant woodpecker species. The monotypic genus Sapheopipo was considered to be a representative of an old lineage of woodpeckers that led to the Eurasian genera Picus and the Blythipicus–Gecinulus species. This view, based on similarities in color patterns, external morphology and foraging behavior, has been adopted in all major accounts of the family. The alternative view, that this woodpecker may be related to the widespread white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos, which evolved distinctive subspecies on other East Asian islands, has not been generally accepted. We analyzed partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene to test these hypotheses. The data suggest that the Okinawa woodpecker is a member of the genus Dendrocopos, with white-backed woodpecker and great spotted woodpecker D. major as close relatives. Color patterns support the genetic results and indicate a closer relationship with the white-backed woodpecker. Consequently, the correct taxonomic designation of the Okinawa woodpecker would be Dendrocopos noguchii (Seebohm in Ibis 5(5):173–182, 1887) in the tribe Campetherini rather than Picini.
Is this to be considered kosher or do we stick with what we've got?
Mukkakukaku, 19 April 2007, 23:01 UTC
:I don't understand your last question but (today in August 2016) the article uses the correct taxonomic designation.--5.249.14.10 (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus & Phylum{{done}}
Talk:Nicolás Fernández de Moratín

message: There's a mistake here. Actually there are two different authors: the father, Nicolás Fernández de Moratín (see :es:Nicolás Fernández de Moratín) and the son, Leandro (see :es:Leandro Fernández de Moratín). So, it's necessary to move this one to Leandro Fernández de Moratín, and to create another one about Nicolás. I would do it but my English is really bad, as you can see. Thanks, --Rupert de hentzau 19:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled