Talk:Viceroyalty of Peru

message: How about moving the section "List of Viceroys" to a separate article, "List of Viceroys of Peru"? That would be parallel to the way Viceroys of New Spain is handled, and more convenient if all the reader is looking for is "who came when". And it will probably be necessary when the main article is expanded anyway, to keep it to a reasonable size.
Rbraunwa 13:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving a section

message: but i think the "Inca" flag shown here is the flag carried by gays. please correct me if im wrong but if i am the resemblence is amazing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.155.11.202 (talk) 22:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes it does because it was "asigned" during the 70's, the real ones use squares --Andersmusician $ 02:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no "Inca flag", the Incas had no notion of flag thus never had one. The wiphala (or rainbow flag) was a 20th-century invention by members of the indigenista movement. Check the relevant discussion at Talk:Inca Empire --Victor12 02:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I dont know much 

message: I've found a different pic with territories in current venezuela taken, please someone say oppinions --Andersmusician $ 02:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: map

message: I am deleting the reference to the Battle of Ayacucho as being alternatively called "The Battle of Quinua."  Many battles names are misnomers due to faulty knowledge of geography at the time they are named (see American Civil War) but this is nothing more than an historical curiosity.  No source nor person I am aware of would refer to the Battle of Ayacucho as the Battle of Quinua...even if the combatants were closer to Quinua than to Ayacucho. Rafajs77 (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Ayacucho 

message: User:Escarlati make this edition  and impose the flag of Cross of Burgundy for Peru.  Why?. Not exist any flag of cross of Burgundy of viceroyalty of Peru. Never. Never. The bibliography say:
::::*Americas is a part of Crown of Castile and Spain and use this symbols. Before the national flag of Spain (Roja y Gualda), the symbol of Spain is the royal coat of arms.    "el escudo de las armas reales, símbolo común de la nacionalidad española" Traslation: "the coat of  royal arms the common symbol of Spanish nationality".
::::* Boletín de la Academia Puertorriqueña de la Historia Las armas de Castilla y León eran las únicas concedidas en los escudos americanos a los nuevos territorios. "The arms of Castile and Leon were the only Americans coats granted to new territories" traslation.
 
::::*  "Mandamos a los virreyes que en los guiones no pongan más que nuestras armas reales, ni usen de las suyas propias, ni de ninguna otras, en actos y concursos como virreyes, presidentes, gobernadores o capitanes generales.". "sent to the viceroys in the banners do not put more than our royal arms, not use of their own, or any other, in events and contest as viceroys, presidents, governors or captains general".Traslation.
::::* Jahrbuch für Geschichte Lateinamerikas.p205 "En el Nuevo Mundo el guión fue el símbolo real usado normalmente por los virreyes, como insignia de su poder militar y emblema de jurisdicción" "In the New World the banner was a royal symbol normally used by the viceroys, as their military insignia and emblem of jurisdiction" Traslation.
--Santos30 (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Plese stop filling this talk page with misinterpretations of sources. You are very aware of the discussion in Talk:New_Spain#flag_was_the_.22estandarte_virreinal.22. --Enric Naval (talk) 13:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You can not ignore the reference of the royal flag in Battle of Ayacucho.--Santos30 (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross of Burgundy and edition of User:Escarlati

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Viceroyalty of Peru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928032200/http://www.amazonia.bo/historia_p.php?id_contenido=34 to http://www.amazonia.bo/historia_p.php?id_contenido=34
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310212528/http://www.regioncallao.gob.pe/historia01.asp to http://www.regioncallao.gob.pe/historia01.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I suspect this is a mistake, although I have not go the sources on hand to confirm it.
Under the 'Succeeded by' section 'Spanish Guinea' is listed, which was a Spanish colony in West Africa, not in South America. Also, under 'Today part of' the modern independent African nation of 'Equatorial Guinea' is listed which was the independent successor of 'Spanish Guinea'.
This presumed error is repeated on the wikipedia page for 'Spanish Guinea' which lists 'Viceroyalty of Peru' as it's successor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.64.109.69 (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equatorial Guinea 

message: The viceroyalty map has errors 1 island of pacua etc I was not part of the Spanish empire, the center and south of present-day Chile and Argentina I was never part of the Spanish empire, the liberating expedition was created by Chile not by Argentina to clarify that Argentina did not exist they were the united provinces of the rio de la plata, etc. a lot of historical error. Greends (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You are not understanding the map is based on de jure claims not on actual control. Easter Island was indeed claimed by Spain as part of the viceroyalty so it is de jure part of it. Dentren | Talk 01:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many historical errors