Talk:Umm Kulthum bint Ali

message: Awn ibn Ja'afer I couldn't cross-reference his name on any Arabic website, some cite a Marawan
--The Brain 03:40, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awn ibn Ja'afer. 

message: http://www.livingislam.org/o/umuk_e.html --Striver 15:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: It's not a certain fact that his burial place that is mentioned in this article is true. According to the following reference:
http://www.tebyan.net/Islam_Features/Prophet/Companions/2006/2/7/27498.html Arjanizary (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Burial Place 

message: Notability is not inherited. Being the child of a notable person, and the wife of another, does not make a person notable in their own right. We need sources that discuss this person and, right now, it doesn't look like we have them. This may well be a candidate for deletion. - Sitush (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you may well be right. I am still unfamiliar with judging a topic's notability status so I think you would be best to decide. When I first came to the page, it was full of rubbish. Please see history of page and you will know what I mean. I had to delete practically half the page. As it stands now it gives no meaning or context to this persons life anyway. Please do whatever you think may be appropriate. Mbcap (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not an area with which I am familiar. My note above was intended as a "shot across the bows" in the hope that some people who are familiar might be able to improve this thing. I suspect that improvement might involve use of non-English sources and I would thus suggest that people consult WP:NOENG for the accepted protocol regarding use of those. Other than that comment, let's give it a bit of time. - Sitush (talk) 01:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: This page has unique characters amongst ENWP articles.  This page has 14 lines in its references box/Section + 11 Lines in Bibliography totaling to 25 lines.  Whereas it has only 11 (including 3 without source) lines in text.  Therefore it needs to be expanded in view of material from both sects in order to satisfy the neutrality. Nannadeem (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Composing observation to page

message: The article currently has many primary sources, hopefully in the coming hours, I will fix these primary sources with secondary sources. Just informing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.73.112.10 (talk) 14:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing articles 

message: Zaynab (sa) was Ali (as) other daughter. Kulthum bint Ali (sa) real name is not sure. WikiShia records many different names so we cannot only put Zaynab in the starting. Her name is disputed, I'm removing Zaynab. Thnx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.63.138.237 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibi (sa) name was not Zaynab 

message: It seems a bit dishonest to describe the following book as a primary source:
*
-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP edits 

message: I have checked the third source -marked unreliable- and there is nothing there about any controversy.
Note that I could only find the two first prints of the book from 1981 and 1982 and not the 2001 print mentioned as a reference. 2A02:CB80:4097:808:7A:F4A1:453D:461E (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third source 

message: The old one	The IP editor's one
           	
An IP editor objects to the infobox.  The reasons he/she gave are as follows:
*15:54, 19 May 2022 Adding the royalty template which is much suitable and usually founded on the wives of caliphs/kings/emperors
*18:31, 19 May 2022 Re-adding template; not 'a lot of good information' was removed; her alleged cause of death being poisoning disputed (see her WikiShia article), its only al-Sana'ni who says this; the only thing removed was the unneccessary long relative list, which would include so many people from her father's family, her grandfather's family; it would be infobox bloat; this template has also far more and better information for her; also re-adding all four spouses
As far as I can see, the old infobox is more useful to the reader.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The infobox 

message: i am sunni muslim and none of prophets grand daughter were married to umar /usman or abubakar sideeq rz Hammadshah73 (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2022