lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Government of Portland, Oregon

message: *Fred Leeson. THE BEGINNINGS: CITY ORGANIZATION BORN IN TEXAS STORM'S AFTERMATH. The Oregonian, June 23, 2005. Aboutmovies (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion source 

message: Just found out he is an ex state senator and house member for anyone looking for an article to write that passes WP:BIO. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Leonard 

message: This article currently fails to mention the titles of commissioners and the power of the mayor to assign their areas of oversight. This page on the City of Portland’s website gives some info on the process though not the titles. Larrybob (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More specific details on Portland’s Commission structure needed 

message: An editor removed long standing edits I have made that is actually part of the this article that is properly sourced saying it is undue to one specific issue. That is understandable if it is not properly sourced. When the contents reflects what multiple independent reliable sources say, I don't believe that's a reason to smother it as undue, especially not an entire section blanking. A stubby article like this could benefit from addition of other contents, not removal of properly sourced, secondary sourced materials. Graywalls (talk) 06:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly sourced and such 

message: The topic of this article is a description of the political structure, elected officials, and bureaus that make up the city government. Not the history of every problem the city has or hasn't tackled. That's what History of Portland, Oregon is for. Steven Walling • talk 06:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This smacks of recentism to me. Are we really going to change the article to focus on one hot button issue? Two years ago we could have had a huge section about Black Lives Matter protests and unrest downtown, but there's nothing here. There's also nothing about the increase in crime. Why not? Because this isn't a history article, it's a description of civic structure. There should either be a section in History of Portland or an entire article about Homelessness in Portland, Oregon, but having more written material about that one issue makes no sense when we don't even have sections for all the city bureaus here. Steven Walling • talk 04:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeless camp sweeps, or lack thereof
Talk:Manual High School (Peoria, Illinois)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 02:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Mention how it got its name. http://www.psd150.org/Page/649
...changing the name of Lincoln Avenue High School to Manual Training High School prior to its opening based on the industrial arts program offered to the students. Jidanni (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name
Talk:Recoil/Archive March 07

message: I don't think this article is accurate.  In most small arms, most of the recoil does not come from conservation of momentum with the bullet itself, as the article asserts.  Instead, it comes from the rapid escape of gasses after the bullet exits the muzzle.  The recoil due to the opposing force of the bullet itself is usually quite small.  However, I am not an expert on recoil (as I am attempting to learn more about it myself), so I do not think I can correct the article. AaronWL 00:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends on the caliber.  A .45 ACP uses a 230 grain bullet, and about 7 grains of powder; in this case the bullet generates nearly all the recoil.  In a .22-250 Remington varmint load, the bullet is about 40 grains and 35-40 grains of powder, so the recoil is as much powder as bullet.  scot 18:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Batman: The Ride (SFOT)

message: This article needs to be deleted, there is already an article about the identical, cloned, Batman: The Ride coasters. This article isn't necessary. (Coasterman1234 22:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree; there's one page for all of the Batman: The Ride coasters, including this one. Tagged for merging with Batman: The Ride. Moronicles 20:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Balamand Monastery

message: Cited from the initial paragraph: [...] is a Greek Orthodox Cistercian monastery founded in 1157 in Balamand near Tripoli. There is no such thing as a Greek Orthodox Cistercian monastery. The point is that Cistercians (belonging to the Roman Catholic Church) founded Belmont in 1157. They left in 1289. Some time later on, a Greek Orthodox monastery was founded on the site of the deserted Cistercian monastery which (under the name of Balamand) continues up to today. --AFBorchert 22:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Greek Orthodox Cistercian" monastery 
Talk:Carl Verheyen

message: Full of peacock terms, no reliable sources, long runon paragraphs.  It needs a complete rewrite.  It's amazing that it's been here this long.  Corvus cornixtalk 16:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a few references, but haven't addressed the other issues. Ross-c (talk) 19:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is a mess
Talk:Grade II listed buildings in Bristol

message: 166 Henleaze Road, The Old Lodge should probably be listed on this page, and possibly also have a photograph. -- The Anome (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the list, there are probably around 300-400 Grade Ii buildings that are not in this list. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Old Lodge 
Talk:History of Essex

message: Is the first (alphabetical) hundred Bastable or Barnstable?  An article for Barstable exists and this article quotes Barnstable. Ksbrowntalk 22:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most sources I'm aware of give Barstable (eg Place Names of Essex. I've changed it and await reaction. Rjm at sleepers 06:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: VoB has BARSTABLE (Preferred) and BARNSTAPLE (Alternate). . MRSC • Talk 10:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Barstable or Barnstable

message: - along the River Thames? Surely that was almost equally as important as the railways! Peter Shearan (talk) 13:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the development -

message: That's quite a gap. And did the Earls of Essex have any significance for the county? Valetude (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straight from 'Norman Essex' to 'Victorian era'
Talk:Browning Buck Mark

message: I added an image of a Buck Mark rifle. I'll try and add some of a couple of the pistol variants. Arthurrh 18:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I got a nice one of the pistol variant. Koalorka (talk) 22:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a pic of my pistol, but anyone who's got any better feel free to swap it out. And a pic of the rifle would be nice. And if anyone has a few pics and can write a few lines about the long-barreled pistol versions the Brits build from the rifle to comply with UK laws that would be awesome. Martin Sandbekken (talk) 19:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:David English (editor)

message: He was the most innovative editor of his day, and the renaissance of the Daily Mail, as a hugely successful piece of applied psychology, deserves to be rationalised and chronicled. 86.145.152.144 (talk) 21:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more substance 

message: The comment that he was about to be made a life peer will be cryptic to most people outside the UK. Presumably we mean a life peerage had been announced on dd/mm/yyyy but he died prior to investiture. We also say nothing about his knighthood, which is bizarre. 
I can't see the sources but I've read enough about the guy over 40 years or so to have a gut feeling that this is a very poor article. - Sitush (talk) 23:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knighthood
Talk:Aleshtar

message: Aleshtar is a city in the Lorestan province in western Iran.The city is thought to be 4000. years old. The population was estimated to number 30,349 residents in 2011. editing by national geographical ajancy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turboogle (talk • contribs) 19:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  <h1>Aleshtar</h1>
Talk:List of Korean Canadians

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
#Support Consistent with other uses. 205.157.110.11 02:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support Consistent with other uses. 205.157.110.11 02:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move
Talk:Yatterman

message: The Yatterman (OVA) has not being released so allow more information to arrive before deciding to merge.
Dwanyewest (talk) 14:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Too Late. In Correct (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Yatterman OVA

message: Do we know what "Yatterman" actually means? It seems to be a combination of Yatta/hurray~! and man, but that's just a random guess on my part.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.93.170 (talk) 17:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably, considering the word's use in the show and names like "Yattodetaman" and "Itadakiman" for later installments. 80.213.254.51 (talk) 02:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Or the word Yatterman could be just a proper name. In Correct (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Yatterman

message: Yatterman characters appeared in commercial=length crossover segments with Gatchaman Characters. One of them is where Doronjo rescues Jun with a mecha monster but then she uses the mecha monster to throw Jun once Doronjo becomes jealous of Jun's popularity.
Another segment is where Boyacky serves customers in a restaurant which happens to be The Science Ninja Team and Dr. Nambu. They eat the soup and then exit the restaurant without paying. 
Should these crossover appearances be added? In Correct (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Appearances Section

message: I am watching this page and noticed a good faith edit. I am putting it here because it is true.
And if there were an anime licensing company like Anime Vision were to release the anime in the United States, there would be uncut and bilingual DVDs and the characters' names and episodes' names would be changed.  The English dub episode names would be shorter and be plays and puns on words and even spinoffs of popular culture.  And for TV, the anime would be heavily edited and localized for the target age group with scenes considered inappropriate to be removed entirely or edited.
In Correct (talk) 02:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Faith Edit
Talk:Chesterfield St Helena School

message: quite old - very good history, short on alumni, info box Victuallers 22:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I only returned by chance. I am from the schools project (see infobox above). I did say "very good history". If this article wants to become more important to the Wiki then I can suggest that in+line referencing would get it a B. If someone can find the Alumni (see Derby School (which is also closed) then the page can become more important. Despite the fact that recently it has ceased to be a school. Hope this clears that up Victuallers 20:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools Assessment
Talk:University Heights, Bronx

message: Should University Heights be considered a subsection of Fordham? I have occasionally heard this neighborhood classified as part of Fordham, and also many times as a separate neighborhood. I believe this area was called Fordham Heights before the NYU uptown campus arrived. -EJ220 22:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Many if not most Bronxites now refer to Fordham as anything within walking distance of Fordham Road to be honest. University Heights though is the official name of the westernmost community surrounding Fordham Road, it includes Bronx Community College. So West Burnside up to Kingsbridge Road, west of Jerome Avenue. North of Morris Heights and south of Kingsbridge Heights. The "official" Fordham area is between Jerome and Webster Avenues, south of Fordham Road down to East Burnside. Fordham-Bedford is north of Fordham Road to Bedford Park Blvd between Jerome and Webster. The name Fordham-Bedford is in newer usage in reflection to the changing demographics south of Bedford Park Blvd (was once just just Bedford Park). Fordham-Bedford now mirrors the demographics of Fordham. Bedford Park is on it's way there if not already. It's tricky but the borders are always changing as the demographics from the South Bronx push north. Wikiwiki718 (talk) 02:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a New York Times article on precisely this problem of imprecision of boundaries.  I'd keep both articles.  When I grew up in this area, it was called University Heights. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of Fordham?
Talk:Chain (real estate)

message: This person has made no effort to justify the reversion.  In addition much of ther grammar is clumsy and inaccurate:
e.g."is a sequence of households, who each depend" - households are not people; it is a collective noun which must be followed by "which"
I could go into many other examples.
The article should begin with the term in bold face and then be defined as I have done.
I am re-reverting and suggesat that the last editor post some suggestions and improvements here for all to see.
Viva-Verdi 22:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion of edit on this article

message: I feel this article needs some re-wording and expansion in order to make it clearer. Also, it needs to mention why these chains are created in the first place and how common they are. —David Johnson [T|C] 14:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Dawn Neesom

message: Removed the 'avid supporter of the English Defence League' because there is no evidence for it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.159.228.132 (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Velociraptor dinoguy2.jpg

message: are you kidding me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by E tac (talk • contribs).
:No...? Dinoguy2 02:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It must be the Jersey Devil! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by E tac (talk • contribs).
Hi Dinoguy! I like u but I think this picture is more accurate. lol Mcelite (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Anti-fan

message: I think this article really needs to be looked over.  While it seems to have a subject worthy of an article, it also seems to be filled with attacks, a previous edit I made removed "Bile Ridden" from the article in reference to anti-fan websites, and obsessive currently links to Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.  But I'm not exactly a Wikipedia expert, I just wanted to flag and bring some attention to this.
- By the way, the link to "Anti-Wizards" seems corrupted...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.201.136.140 (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: - BlueAshes has made some edits to address this, though not much can be done as there has been no other valid research done into the Anti-fans topic.TRSupersour (talk) 04:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing this page 

message: This term is bordering on personal research and I’m removing it. Post if you wish to differ. TRSupersour (talk) 04:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sane-Fan
Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized

message: The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon.  Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not understand?  Was that last bit sarcasm?  Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot!  Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... Raeft 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 
Talk:Clear Creek Abbey

message: There is a French Wikipedia article on the monastery at Fontgombault, but no English
language article. What is the wikipedia policy when this happens -- should we link
to the French article, or translate it? Thanks, Cjwiki 23:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Peoria

message: Discussion 2016
I have removed a copyvio /copypaste template. The text is taken in parts from this page http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11661b.htm - but the page content is in the public domain. Refdoc (talk) 09:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically Roman Catholic is more specific since there may be e.g. Ancient Catholic diocese or Eastern Rite Catholic diocese. On the other hand I don't believe there is any other diocese based out of Peoria. We should probably just follow whatever is standard on WP for naming diocese. EyeTripleE (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ...which appears to be Roman Catholic as in Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago. EyeTripleE (talk) 21:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Little Rock School District

message: This school district is linked from Orval_Faubus, but the article doesn’t mention a famous mid-20C court case. Methinks it should. JDAWiseman (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brown v. Board of Education 

message: If one wants to see what the attendance zone boundaries looked like in the past:
* http://web.archive.org/web/20110521091514/http://lrsd.org/files/zones/2001hi.pdf
* http://web.archive.org/web/20110521091527/http://lrsd.org/files/zones/2006_middle_school_zones_all.pdf
* http://web.archive.org/web/20070316065854/http://www.lrsd.org/zones/2001mid.pdf
* http://web.archive.org/web/20030422154459/http://www.lrsd.org/Zones/2001el.pdf
* http://web.archive.org/web/20070316065643/http://www.lrsd.org/zones/2001el.pdf
* http://web.archive.org/web/20110521091518/http://lrsd.org/files/zones/2009_LR_School_Elementary_School_Map.pdf
This may be useful for checking historical school information for various Little Rock neighborhoods and Cammack Village
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous attendance zones
Talk:Robert Morris University Illinois

message: This page's name needs to be changed to "Robert Morris University" It became a fully accredited university 5/1/09.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.70.67 (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is changed, but in a few daysmins I'll move it again to Robert Morris University (Illinois) because of naming standards, I messed up, and created the page before I moved it. So once the current page is deleted, the name will change again.Moonraker0022 (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is done. I believe due to the unique case of having Robert Morris University in Pennsylvania, and this on in Chicago, Springfield and Aurora, instead of -(dash) Illinios, it could be left like (Illinios) or ,(comma) Illinios. Moonraker0022 (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: How could I find out who the Athletic Directors were between 2003 and 2007 for the Springfield campus? 161.82.124.147 (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former AD
Talk:Manuela Sáenz

message: According to this article: "Her body was buried in a communal mass grave and her belongings, including most of Bolivar's love letters, were burned." However, according to the Simón Bolívar page, which has a reference: "Shortly before her own death in 1856, Sáenz augmented this collection by giving O'Leary her own letters from Bolívar." Does anyone have a reference for the statement in this article?
--128.171.157.189 (talk) 21:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Besides, O'Leary died in 1854.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.218 (talk) 02:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Letters

message: Jejeje shc 200.84.54.103 (talk) 22:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuela Sáenz
Talk:Cusp (anatomy)

message: There has got to be a better picture from somebody who isn't a pop-guzzling chain-smoker who brushes his teeth with coffee grounds.--76.112.143.35 (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine to me, given that we're looking for a world-wide perspective. Tooth whitening shouldn't be a requirement for such images. Klbrain (talk) 12:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better picture?
Talk:Sixth chord

message: What audio file should be included to improve this article's quality? What example should be given? Hyacinth (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. Hyacinth (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reqaudio

message: :"This use of "sixth chord" to mean "added sixth chord" should not be labeled "non-standard" since it's that only in the eyes of classical music theory, but it's the standard term in popular music."
I removed the above hidden comment from the article so it could be addressed and addressed here. Hyacinth (talk) 12:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-standard?

message: 2nd link  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.108.141 (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken audio link 

message: In the article, shouldn't E-flat and C be transposed in the following sentence:
"Note that Cm6 has the same notes as F9 with the root omitted, i.e. the notes F (omitted), A, E♭, C, and G. "
72.130.181.15 (talk) 23:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  F9 

message: It seems that the few times folks do drop by here, it's to treat this as a forum for discussion of its parent article's subject. I would like to remind everyone that if you cannot tie it into improving the article in any way, a discussion should not be had here. Please find a forum outside of Wikipedia to discuss the topic itself; I have just removed a series of posts that had nothing whatsoever to do with actually making the article any better. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 01:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bears repeating 