Talk:Psycho IV: The Beginning

message: There is not point in mentioning the return of that maze because it has nothing to do with the movie. The original incarnation of the maze does only because it used the original set from the movie. The newer one didn't, they made a replica.--Farquaadhnchmn(Dungeon) 20:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: HHN Maze of 2006

message: The single worst line of prose in all of Wikipedia right here in this article:  "The film ends with Norman burning down the Bates mansion to free himself of his past for good, but after the whole town is deserted, it shows the inside of the cellar, a misting ghostly shape is floating in the air, the ghost then gets a awful howling noise, then a very scary shot shows the ghost get real close to the camera, when the hissing sound says: Come Back For Me Norman! The dramatic voice and line was said by the one who plays Normans mother, Olivia Hussey."
What crap!  Encyclopedia my arse...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.69.81.2 (talk) 16:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I thinkg I've found it

message: On 27 May 2009, user "68.51.191.101" deleted a chunk of the already-brief plot summary.  Why?  Vandalism?  Restoration suggested.  The News Hound 10:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the deletion?

message: I am aware that in the Infobox template for the 8th "Halloween" film Halloween: Resurrection it says "followed by" the subsequent Rob Zombie remake of the very first film. Likewise the Infobox template for the 3rd "Hills Have Eyes" film The Hills Have Eyes III it says "followed by" the mid-2000s remake. Nonetheless, I am not sure this is a good practice, and it seems unwarranted by the actual guidelines for the template Template:Infobox film which just says "If the film is part of a series, insert the film(s) that followed it in the series". I realize you would probably do this with Daniel Craig's appearance in Casino Royale which a reboot but NOT a remake!!! However, to do it with remakes strikes me as not really right, notwithstanding it has been done with the 2 above-mentioned film series. (Is the 2000s film of The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe a followup to the 1990s BBC adaptation of The Silver Chair, the 4th Narnia book? I think not.)
I have as such for the second time reverted an edit to the Infobox of this film which says it is "followed by" the 1998 remake of the original Psycho. Any thoughts on this?--WickerGuy (talk) 02:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Followed by in Infobox. Query on Editors opinions? 

message: The movie is not ignoring all events in part 2 and 3. Norman tells Fran on the telephone that his last murders happened four years ago. That clearly indicates the events of part 2 and 3. Sry for my bad english.93.128.88.167 (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: An interesting observation. However, the statement that 2 & 3 are ignored is noted here as the opinion of critic Robert Price, not as fact.--WickerGuy (talk) 01:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity to part 2 and 3 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Psycho IV: The Beginning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120401083024/http://www.thepsychomovies.com/films/psycho4/mgarris.html to http://www.thepsychomovies.com/films/psycho4/mgarris.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified