lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fusiliers Mont-Royal

message: The last few lines or the last section in total seem to be just advertising the place IMO. Take out or is it relevant? Information about members and how to meet isn't relevant but it does make padd the article.
--Guruparan 23:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't say it was commercial advertising. And advertsing, no matter for who (non-profit or commercial) isn't accepted. But I at least think that the last line is irrelevant. I would hope so. --Guruparan 02:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement? 

message: https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/official-military-history-lineages/lineages/infantry-regiments/fusiliers-mont-royal.html
Operational history
North West Rebellion
The battalion was mobilized for active service, under the designation '65th Mounted Rifles, "Mount Royal Rifles"' on 10 April 1885 --AlainV (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Early operations name
Talk:Mount Paran Christian School

message: more topics, pics and refs.  welcomeVictuallers 17:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fusiliers de Sherbrooke

message: In WWII, as a tank regiment, a squadron under the command of Sydney Valpy Radley-Walters attacked and destroyed a squadron of tanks under the command of The Black Baron, also killing Michael Wittman in the process. 76.66.196.218 (talk) 08:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII 

message: This photo might be useful. :Image:Wittmann Tiger 007.jpg
76.66.196.218 (talk) 06:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Wittmann Tiger 007.jpg
Talk:Governor General's Body Guard

message: The Governor General's Body Guard → Governor General's Body Guard — Move for consistency and WP:NCD. RJASE1 23:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: have created rewrite for uniform section to correct alleged copyright issues.
:The proposed new version still has quite a bit of overlap with the source document, as you can see by this report.— Diannaa (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  have created rewrite for uniform section
Talk:Governor General's Horse Guards

message: The Governor General's Horse Guards → Governor General's Horse Guards — Move for consistency and per WP:NCD RJASE1 22:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: #Oppose. The definite article is a part of the official names of many regiments; the fact that it was actually officially removed for some (e.g. Governor General's Foot Guards) indicates it's actually part of the proper name. WP:NCD also states, with reagrd to keeping the articles: ":Oppose: Some -- not all -- Canadian regimental names include the definite article in their names. The fact that not all do, and that some have had the article officially removed (e.g. Governor General's Horse Guards) indicates that the article should be retained for those regiments for whom it was retained. The conventions themselves state (with regard to keeping the definite articles) "This also extends to some non-musical groups, [emphasis mine] and even beyond "official" naming, for example The Invincibles (which is the nickname of several sports teams)." So even the guideline admits that the article need not be omitted in every case. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 22:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in opposition to the move
Talk:Hastings and Prince Edward Regiment

message: The page indicates on the Regiments Anniversaries that Pachino Day is June 10 1943. It is actually July 10. ref Page 55 of "The Regiment" by Farley Mowat.
69.159.72.113 (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pachino Day, July 10 1943 

message: The King Street Armoury in Cobourg is not occupied by the Hast & PER and has never been. When C Coy stood up in Cobourg, they did so in an industrual unit on Wilmott Street east of town.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.178.33 (talk) 21:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobourg Armoury 
Talk:Machoke

message: I can scan in a picture of Dark Machoke pokemon card, if necessary? Please message me, because I probably won't check this discussion again. Raz.you.up 21:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Machoke 

message: It says in the bioligcal carachteristics is says (a perfic quote): "However, it is a very conceited Pokemon. It may be too busy looking in a mirror to fight." Where did this come from? and where is it said? It is not mentioned in the anime or games or the TCG. -Fear teh Happy! 00:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miror WTF? 

message: Can I remove the part of the note that Machoke can't learn Superpower? Because it is so obvious. Maybe I can eat it... -Fear teh Happy! 00:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  uh duh!
Talk:Irish Regiment of Canada

message: The Irish Regiment of Canada → Irish Regiment of Canada — Move for consistent categorization and WP:NCD. RJASE1 23:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Lake Superior Scottish Regiment

message: Expansion of article beyond a stub. Any ideas/contributions are welcome! Bulbous 02:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Class=start as I read this article today ................. PKT(alk) 18:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Lord Strathcona's Horse (Royal Canadians)

message: I've just added a tranche of pictures from the Boer War period to :commons:Category:Lord Strathcona's Horse, if they're of use for the article! Andrew Gray (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Just wondering if there is a reason why it's not included on the LdSH(RC) page?  I'm mre than willing to work on it if people are okay with that.  Superfly94 (talk) 14:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mounted Troop 

message: I do not believe that "LSH" would have been embroidered on a "divsional patch," it would have been on a cloth "shoulder title" or "shoulder flash."Ab.chaplin (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal annecdote 

message: n/t ---- 217.248.18.65 (talk) 23:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: See Donald Smith, 1st Baron Strathcona and Mount Royal. PKT(alk) 15:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was Lord Strathcona? 

message: Does the Strathconas' nickname from the South African War, "the Queen's Cowboys," rate mention? I haven't been able to find a contemporary source that uses the nickname; it seems to have been handed down through oral tradition.Ab.chaplin (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames 

message: Now that the colonel-in-chief is the King, is this squadron called "The King's Squadron"? Indefatigable (talk) 15:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Wales's Squadron
Talk:Lorne Scots (Peel, Dufferin and Halton Regiment)

message: Someone had made all the unit names bolded. When there were a lot in a small area it made reading the article very difficult. I changed bolded unit names to be italicized instead. It still emphasizes them, but is much easier to read.Theshowmecanuck (talk) 05:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bolding of unit names 
Talk:Loyal Edmonton Regiment

message: ComRsch, NORAD/SAC, MilSpec ... here I am evidently incompetent.
Years on WikiPedia; decades on WWW ... which count for nothing. I went Army to interdict Soviets. For years I've felt the need to interdict yuppies ... along with cracKKKers, who are noisier but easier to deal with.
Here's my point: I had 2 images that I think are slight improvements on those that are already on the page. But I got slammed by a totally yuppie / ridiculously legalistic release for the images. (Why I live to support officers? cuz they're really good at some things that are important. Why I rejected commission / sing the praises of Snr NCO? cuz heh ... that's where sanity is!)
http://bentrem.net/75thr/images/LER-Colours.jpg (Very high res)
http://bentrem.net/75thr/images/LER-CapBadge.jpeg (Oh, to have that badge and a green beret!
--BenTrem (talk) 05:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: What is the source for "The Hundred Pipers" being a regimental march?  The DHH lineage document shows only "Bonnie Dundee". Indefatigable (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regimental march 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Loyal Edmonton Regiment (4th Battalion, Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry) →  – At WP:CFDS, User:Armbrust suggested to rename :Category:The Loyal Edmonton Regiment in order to align the category name with the much longer article name. While that is normally standard procedure, we may instead shorten the article name in order to align it with the category name. Afaics there is no ambiguity in using just "Loyal Edmonton Regiment". Marcocapelle (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 October 2022
Talk:Mississauga Horse

message: A good start, it explains the core of what the Horse is. If there is any expansion possible, I think this article would benefit greatly. Also, I am curious, it is really "The Mississauga Horse," or is that shorthand for "Horse Regiment" or "Horse Detachment" or something? Seems like talking about "The embattled Third" when you mean "The Third Company." LordAmeth 13:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is really "The Mississauge Horse", bearing in mind "The" forms part of the proper title. It's no different than Lord Strathcona's Horse (Royal Canadians or other similar regiments throughtout CW military history.Michael Dorosh 14:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment
Talk:The Bob Cummings Show

message: It seems to me that this character use to drive a car which he could turn into an airplane!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.224.110 (talk) 19:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See The New Bob Cummings Show#Synopsis.    Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:20, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: channel 31 Melbourne is showing re-runs at 2pm melbourne time. should i add this fact, or is it not important enough.Yet-another-user 06:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's on channel 31 australia 

message: The Synopsis section says that Cummings was cast in The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis, but the article for that does not even list him in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Many_Loves_of_Dobie_Gillis#Cast section. It appears to be in error.  uriel8  (talk) 07:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cummings was definitely in The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis.  In fact, he was the main star of that show.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 

message: This stupid article says this is the first-ever series to debut as a midseason replacement.  This is so wrong it's ridiculous.  There were many before it:  Dragnet, the Bendix version of The Life of Riley, Private Secretary, My Friend Irma, etc. etc. etc. ... I corrected it, but it was removed, for reasons which will remain mysterious.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Spelvin214 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You may (or may not) be correct about this - citing the text with a reference from a reliable source would be helpful of course - otherwise, the text may be considered original research and reverted - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:New Orleans Square

message: Are all the shops; attractions there fully listed, or is this a selected list?  HolyBaloney (talk) 00:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the shops, attractions etc. a full listing or a selected listing? 

message: — Assignment last updated by DauntlessTim (talk) 21:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: XCOR 1012, Digitizing New Orleans
Talk:Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders of Canada

message: Can somebody translate Ullamh & add? Thanx.  TREKphiler hit me ♠  07:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was translated but not until you got to the bottom of the article. I've put it in the box as well. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. (Serves me right for not reading it all... ;D)  TREKphiler [[User 
talk:Trekphiler|hit me ♠ ]] 06:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah well, it need to be at the top. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 06:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Say what?
Talk:Nasser Amin

message: Following concerns expressed about the article, I have merged much of the content into a section in SOAS Students' Union, which you will see. I have redirected this page to that one.
Joe
'Funnyyettasty' is fundamentally wrong. This article concerns an area of interest to the academic community and other groups. The particular topic - and other related ones- have received media attention from around the world. Leading journalists and even former Ambassadors have made interventions. Amin's case is continuing.
As suggested below, 'Funnyyettasty' appears to have a vested interest in suppressing this information...'''
While I am fully supportive of Amin's freedom of speech, I find this article to be heavily weighed in his favor and definitely using some inflammatory-style invectives (i.e. calling his detractors pro-Zionist "witchhunt"). I think this article should focus, as much as possible, on the inappropriateness of the response without resorting to labelling. In addition, I have heard that death-threats and similarly intentioned messages have been directed at those who protested against Amin's article as well. I also question whether the mention of the Islamaphobia awards is relevant in this context. The point of this article should not necessarily be to point fingers and dispense blame, but rather to point out the wrongness of the situation. Also, just as a note of caution: the Wikipedia editors have traditionally been leery of putting up articles which have a limited scope of importance. If they feel that the incident or individual lacks importance, this article will not remain. My suggestion for making it more relevant would be to put in more of an explanation for why this is important, what precedents might be set within the UK academic system, etc. And, finally, if this is an article about Amin then it should be primarily biographical in format; that is, there should be some description of Amin apart from this current controversy. FunnyYetTasty 20:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Woolston railway station

message: -- Chris j wood 20:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do you 'round a river'? 
Talk:Rocky Mountain Rangers

message: This page should be expanded upon and merged with 172nd (Rocky Mountain Rangers) Battalion, CEF
* I disagree.  This page is about the present day militia regiment.  The WWI battalion was a different entity entirely. Cjrother 02:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging? 

message: Is this standard; seems odd; shouldn't the title be what's now the redirect I found this through, Rocky Mountain Rangers (plus all the regimental stuff); without the "The", that is?Skookum1 (talk) 08:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The "The" has been declared standard by the currently serving leadership. It was a big debate for a long time, but eventually settled by HQ decision. MikeOv (talk) 05:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "The" in title?

message: I know that Cole Patterson is not the CO of the Dawson Creek corps, unless he's of the same name as someone mentioned in previous page vandalism. could somone in the know fix this? MikeOv (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadet COs
Talk:Royal Canadian Horse Artillery

message: There is a mistake in this passage:
"5 RALC is the francophone element of the regular artillery, and was formed in 1968. 5 RALC is part of 2nd Canadian Division's 5 Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group. It is composed of two Gun Batteries (X and Q), one Surveillance and Target Acquisition Battery (R), a Forward Observation Battery (V), and its Headquarters Battery (BCS).[9]."
The two gun batteries are X and R, the STA (target acquisition) battery is Q and the rest is correct. The French version of this article also contains mistakes as to the role of the batteries, which may have been different in the past. I can't source this from the web and I do not have access to regimental histories or documents right now, but someone with access to these things should correct the mistake.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.59.150.135 (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Highland Fusiliers of Canada

message: It seems that this regiment may be the same as the Highland Light Infantry of Canada. If so perhaps the two pages should be merged into one? Asteuartw (talk) 13:15, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion with Highland Light Infantry
Talk:Royal Newfoundland Regiment

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/dhh-dhp/his/ol-lo/vol-tom-3/par2/rnr-eng.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Either a disputed or confusion has arisen concerning the topic of the timings of the Royal prefix given to the regiment during WWI. I've returned the text to the previous baseline until a common position is reached. I've likewise included Parsons as a source so that another source other than Nicolson is present.--Labattblueboy (talk) 22:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regimental WWI honours 

message: Either a disputed or confusion has arisen concerning the topic of the timings of the Royal prefix given to the regiment during WWI. I've returned the text to the previous baseline until a common position is reached. I've likewise included Parsons as a source so that another source other than Nicolson is present.--Labattblueboy (talk) 22:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regimental WWI honours 

message: I've moved content not directly attached to the regiment but still central to the WWII military history of Newfoundland to the following article: Military history of the Dominion of Newfoundland during World War II.--Labattblueboy (talk) 20:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military history of the Dominion of Newfoundland during World War II
Talk:Royal Westminster Regiment

message: For any Wikipedia editors who have served in the Royal Westminster Regiment, I have created a userbox that you can add to your user page. - Ahunt (talk) 12:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: Re this:
:which was formed on November 21, 1863 and was the first militia unit raised in British Columbia, predating Canada as a natio
That may be what the regimental history says, but there were teh Victoria Voltigeurs in the Colony of Vancouver Island and the Victoria Rifles; the former composed of French-Canadians and Metis, drssed habitant-style, the latter also known as the African Rifle Corps.  I suppose on the mainland, i.e. in the Colony of British Columbia, the New Westminster Rifles were the first; but not in BC as a whole.Skookum1 (talk) 14:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Vancouver Island was not part of BC at the time I believe the statement is correct and is correctly sourced, although perhaps this could be explained in the text. - Ahunt (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First militia unit??

message: If anyone wants i could walk down and get a picture of the Armory i am only a block away 207.6.168.201 (talk) 04:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be useful! - Ahunt (talk) 13:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: According to The Regiments and Corps of the Canadian Army (Vol. I of the Canadian Army List), the march of the regiment is "Warickshire Lads." When and by what authority did it change to "The Maple Leaf Forever"?Ab.chaplin (talk) 10:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Regimental March
Talk:Royal Winnipeg Rifles

message: The battle honours that are capitalized are on the cap badge; they were not capitalized in error. SigPig 04:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization of Battle Honours

message: "Rifles regiments were essentially the first guerrilla soldiers"
Does anyone else find this sentence hard to believe?  I wouldn't have described uniformed soldiers as guerrillas.  Cjrother 03:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that sentence.  Cjrother 19:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guerrilla
Talk:Seaforth Highlanders of Canada

message: Chose to nominate participants in the Vancouver project as being most helpful; what I'm hoping someone can provide is a nice shot of the Seaforth Armoury on Burrard at 1st; and/or the Seaforth on parade, e.g. in the PNE Parade or at Remembrance Day....Skookum1 08:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done. bobanny 08:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Req photo

message: I would like to expand this page in order to flesh out the history of the unit.
  
I would also like to update the heraldry on the right side of the page as I believe new Heraldry has been approved by the Governor General of Canada.
Also I believe the links at the bottom of the page referring to the execution of German Naval deserters after the Second World War should be removed.  This is obviously a significant event in Canadian History and I would like to create a separate page for it; however, I think it bears little relevance to the history of this unit in particular as this policy was carried out by all Allied Forces after the war.
I would appreciate any comments on my proposed changes to the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.62.101 (talk) 08:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Seaforth Highlanders are front and centre in that article on the two Germans, so I don't see how it's not relevant. Aside from that, I welcome any expansion to this article. bobanny (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion of this page