Talk:Indo-Guyanese

message: I see no reason to merge the articles - could you explain why you think this is a good idea?  Thanks.  Guettarda 14:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See my comments on Indo-Carribean. This article is tiny and covers nothing that isn't on the main Indo-Carribean page. Furthermore, almost all of what is said in that article, plus the Indo-Trinidadian article applies here. To flesh out Indo-Guyanese and Indo-Trinidadian properly would be to end up with three articles with a lot of duplicate information. I propose that Indo-Carribean have Indo-Guyanese and Indo-Trinidadian as sub sections of Indo-Carribean, not as separate articles. --JamesTheNumberless 15:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: This needs links to support the work. "Stub" isn't a substitute for qualified, citable, information.--Jhelyam (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coverage 

message: this article was hijacked by Indians from India. Most info on the Background of where people came is wouldn't be know by the average Guyanese. it seems extremely  India biased. India in its present form didn't even exist when the their ancestors started leavinging in the 1830's. This article needs a major overhaul starting with the removal of the Indian flag.Alot of the information is taken from a extremely old book from the very early 1960's Guyana in Pictures. I know the book. Some of the info in it is very old, totally wrong and outdated. All they did was just add new pictures to the book. for example it combines the other population of the other races to 1%. which is totally wrong even toady. In the 1960's when the this book was written the Portugese population alone was at 10%. Starbwoy (talk) 23:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article was hijacked

message: This information was removed as it makes no sense and was repeated 3 times. i fixed the area it was in. If anyone can understand it maye they can add bits of it
==
They were y categorized with multiple identities, with a more localized prioritized ethnic orientation, for example, Bihari people, Haryanvi people, Avadhi people, Malvi people, Himachali people, Bhojpuri people, in addition to further tribal, village, or religious identities.
Although the word "Bharati" refers to people from the Indian subcontinent, known in Sanskrit and Hindi as Bharat, it is historically important to understand the complex history, culture, ethos and demography of the nation of India, also known as Bhārat Gaṇarājya. Certain groups of Hindustani people are identified with multiple identities, with a more localized prioritized ethnic orientation, for example, Bihari people, Haryanvi people, Avadhi people, Malvi people, Himachali people, Rajasthani people, in addition to further tribal, village, or religious identities. 
Guyana has only one national dish and its Amerindian (pepperpot)
The blending of cultures made Indian cuisine more widely known and accepted as national dishes, such as gulab jamun, parasad (sweet coconut paste with raisins), sweet rice, Dal Puri, chicken curry, and seven curry, a dish of seven curries eaten at one meal, generally served at weddings, poojas, and religious functions.Starbwoy (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: =Information that cannot be understood

message: I am trying to undo an edit that changed the layout. I’m trying to revert it back to the old layout and need help with this. Willow591 (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am trying to undo an edit that changed the layout of the page. There was a typo in the edit and it accidentally changed the layout of the page, I am trying to revert this.