Talk:Hohner

message: I am a fan of the Old Standby, model 34B.  However I have been very disgusted for the past decade because Hohner has turned a fine, German made instrument into a cheap Chinese made piece of junk.  I bought one of these new version 34Bs, and a reed blew out in a couple weeks, and the cover plates tarnished in days.  34B is a classic model...I believe it is even older than the Marine Band.  It is a shame to treat this classic harp, and its fans, with such disrespect.
 
I plead with Hohner to upgrade the quality of the Old Standby to be comparable with the Big River Harp.  Start making 34B in Germany again, make it a fine instrument again, but keep the low price, as they do with the Big River. Where the Big River is the low price entry in the MS series, revamp the Old Standby to be a low price alternative to the Special 20.  Upgrade the Old Standby to be a high quality German made harp with a low price.
Azariah Marvel (talk) 20:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hohner needs to upgrade Old Standby

message: First, the Refimprove. The lede alone is terrible, setting a tone with inflated claims and not even an attempt at sourcing.
The recurring fanboy sin: repeated claims to "notable players" with no objective outside authority (not even the company itself!) actually making the claim that these clusters are somehow significant or representative or complete. For all we know, a namedropped player actually plays Lee Oskar harps and despises (but once played) Hohner. At least a list of past or present official endorsees would be verifiable.
Should this article be about Hohner Musikinstrumente GmbH or Hohner musical instruments or Hohner harmonicas? It is doing a poor job of covering all bases: where is discussion of their accordions, let alone fullsize keyboards? How about their place in the current ukulele fad?
The Subdivisions section is just... weird. What EXACTLY are we to be divvying here? And why is there only one option presented?
Harmonica models should not be discussed in the present tense unless they are presently available commercially AND this is validated by a credible source. Perhaps separating them into current vs. legacy models. And if the list cannot be made reasonably complete, then each past model ought to have mention of why it is somehow significant, whether through association with some non-obscure player or media (cinema, TV) or as a predecessor of a more-remembered model.
To be properly encyclopedic about Hohner harmonicas, there ought to be some effort put into discussing the engineering, the design evolution of these products, beginning with how the company ramped up from a kitchen-table craft operation to an assembly-line factory and automation. There is also the potential to mention how the company functioned during the Hitler era, and as well during the earlier anti-German sentiment in the United States. 
Well, that's for starters. Weeb Dingle (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs MUCH upgrade 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hohner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091117090348/http://www.hohnerharmonicas.net/64_chromonica_chromatic.html to http://www.hohnerharmonicas.net/64_chromonica_chromatic.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified