Talk:Paul Burrell

message: In his memoirs he describes the nicknames as 'Tall Paul' and 'Small Paul', and not 'Big Paul' and 'Little Paul' as stated here on Wikipedia. I cannot change it however - no edit button.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CR1670 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tall Paul

message: He isn't really notable apart from the scandal he was involved in.  Perhaps it might be an idea to junk all the stuff about his TV appearances in latter years, and move the material to Burrell affair here instead? Vashti 21:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this, any objections? --Iacobus 05:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Notable for being a royal footman or butler? Or for being a contestant on celebrity shows based on his noteriety stemming from the Burrell Affair? If there is anything else to his notability, can you please explain? Thanks. --Iacobus 00:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Is there a definition of "notorious" for Wiki purposes?  People in his position are sworn to secrecy about anything and everything they learn while in Royal service.  But what did he do?  He spilled his guts and became a media sensation.  For being a traitorous turncoat.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:15, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: I am requesting that this talk page be moved back to its original location of Talk: Paul Burrell. A vandal appears to have moved the original page from Talk: Paul Burrell to Talk: James bratt, then to here. I don't know how to revert this, so am making this request. Thank you. Egdirf (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As regards the original Paul Burrell article, this still exists, but there is now a duplicate at Not Paul burrel. An anon user has requested Not Paul burrel be deleted. Egdirf (talk) 22:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 

message: "Burrell is very misunderstood by the public and by the media."
This in particular stands out, but the whole introduction (pre-contents) section strikes me as NPOV, and has no references. It is written like an amateur press release for him. Thoughts? 130.88.179.77 (talk) 16:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: interesting. I came to this talk page for that exact reason, it's such an outrageous statement that without a lot of respected sources espousing the same view, it cannot be left in the article. I tried to delete but someone (who apparently does not particularly favour the ideal of free editing in wikipedia) has arbitrarily protected the page without attached the template142.106.63.213 (talk) 
16:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: I personally review this charater as one of the worst in the World. Not on the scale of Mira Hindley, but he is not much better in my opinion. But that is clearly a personal opinion. 
I believe it must be possible to find properly sourced material about him that expesses a similar (but less extream) view, that should stand up to Wikipedia's policy, and not be liberous. Drkirkby (talk) 11:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properly sourced critisms 

message: An image used in this article, File:Paulburrellflowers.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:22, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Paulburrellflowers.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Paul Burrell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/northeast/guides/halloffame/public_life/paul_burrell.shtml
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120722091234/http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/books/Way-We-Were-Remembering-Diana-Paul-Burrell/9780061341298-item.html?ikwid=remembering+diana&ikwsec=Home to http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/books/Way-We-Were-Remembering-Diana-Paul-Burrell/9780061341298-item.html?ikwid=remembering+diana&ikwsec=Home
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: This "secret" was that Diana once mentioned to him she might go and live in America. She mentioned this to a few people.198.140.62.1 (talk) 13:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Secret he would never reveal"