lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ATM

message: I've removed a couple of items, as noted here:
* Azhagiya Tamil Magan, forthcoming Tamil film starring Vijay and Shreya
*:The article reference is OK, but 'ATM' isn't mentioned in the article at all.
* Anti-tank guided missile
*:The acronyms appearing in the target article are 'ATGM' and 'ATGW'; 'ATM' is not mentioned.
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I today re-removed that entry, and an anonymous user even decided to place it atop the list.  Someone must be desperate to promote the film, unless they think people interested in Automated Teller Machines or Asynchronous Transfer Mode are their target audience.  -- Jimbonator (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removals of line items for cause

message: I came here looking for "Asynchronous Transfer Mode" and I get to read down a list that includes "a-- to mouth".  Is there any way we can be a little more tactful for those of us who want to do something useful on the Internet?  What if my kids were looking for "ATM" meaning "Asynchronous Transfer Mode" or "Automatic Teller Machine" for a class at school?  I understand and support free speech and free information, but I also support decency and adult responsibility.  I would be fine with leaving the link on this page as long as the text description is a lot less offensive - unfortunately I can't think of a less offensive description or title that wouldn't make it a useless link.  Am I out of line here or what?  Does anyone else have an idea of what to do here?  --Rcronk 22:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tact 

message: Is the list in any particular order?  I'd vote for some logical grouping, and then alphabetical by fully expanded phrase within that, or just alphabetical in general.  What's the "Best Practice" ? Ttennebkram (talk) 16:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorting the List?

message: atm is is used by gamers and cell phone users to mean "at the moment"
For instance you might say something like "sorry busy atm"
this use of atm should be listed 
Sorry that I am not following formatting conventions
-Robertsmom  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.208.184 (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. However, we already have an entry for "atm" in Wiktionary, and if you look at the top-right of the page we are discussing you will see a link to that entry, where the use of "atm" for "at the moment" is given.  Wiktionary is the right place for dictionary definitions, not this "disambiguation" page, which is only for distinguishing between articles in Wikipedia itself that have similar titles: Noyster  (talk),  10:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  at the moment
Talk:Macedonian Slavs/Poll

message: Keep this article at Macedonian Slavs; refer to people X in other articles as "Macedonian Slavs" unless inappropriate in the context.
# I agree that there is nothing at all definitive about either term.  However, as this term adds a modifier, it at least prevents confusion, and we should use the terms that our readers will search by and be least confused by. Geogre 00:19, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia should call people X "Macedonian Slavs" 

message: Keep this article at Macedonians, Ethnic Macedonians, Macedonians (ethnicity), Macedonians (nationality) or other properly dissambiguated name; refer to people X in other articles as "Macedonians" unless inappropriate in the context.
# This seems to be the most reasonable option. Term "Macedonians" is widely accepted, both colloquially and academically and will have a clear meaning in most contexts. We can address Greek sentiments by clearly clarifying whom we are talking about when writing about Macedonians if there is a need to distinguish between the region, it's past, and modern Republic of Macedonia. --Dejan Cabrilo 00:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia should call people X "Macedonians" 

message: It seems that a fair number of the votes above are from people to whom the issue is close to heart. I wonder what the poll result would look like if these votes were excluded for reasons of non-neutrality! :> --Rebroad 08:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Poll Comments

message: * Option 1: Continue calling people X "Macedonian Slavs"
** 39 votes were received for this option. Of these, 10 were discounted as invalid (see below). The final tally of valid votes was 29 votes.
* Option 2: Describe people X as "Macedonians"
** 47 votes were received for this option. Of these, 16 were discounted as invalid (see below). The final tally of valid votes was 29 votes.
The outcome being a tie, the result of the vote is that the article and links to it shall remain as Macedonian Slavs.
From rules of the poll above:
* If no option wins 60% of all votes, the poll shall be archived and its results considered moot.
Zocky 18:23, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome

message: "To discourage socket puppetry, only users with more than 50 edits before 00:00, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Invalid votes for "Macedonian Slavs"

message: "To discourage socket puppetry, only users with more than 50 edits before 00:00, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Invalid votes for "Macedonians"
Talk:Welfare definition of economics

message: At the very least, this article is terribly titled. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:19, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
*I think the correct wording would be 'definition of welfare economics' and it should be merged into welfare economics.--Fenice 14:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not agree with the proposed merger. Welfare economics is a distinct branch of microeconomics. This article is not about welfare economics. Neither is it an attempt to define welfare economics. The author of this article is giving a definition of economics that according to Marshall goes beyond a pure scarcity or efficiency based definition. This is about the definition of economics as a whole. mydogategodshat 22:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: A related topic, Grameen Bank, has been nominated on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. Contribute your expertise and vote for Grameen Bank on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive!--Fenice 06:47, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement drive

message: What is wealth? What the characteristics of wealth. 2404:7C00:62:8A22:D131:9941:6994:B4E6 (talk) 02:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic
Talk:Rice rocket

message: I've redirected this page to Rice burner. There isn't that much solid material to source an article on, and all of it I could find is at Rice burner.  I suppose this page could duplicate the parts that cover "rice rocket", but why?  If you know the answer, or you know of some reliable sources you can use to make Rice rocket into a solid, distinct article, then by all means, edit away.--Dbratland (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected to Rice burner
Talk:Ian Gillan

message: The article says - "Gillan was born on 19 August 1945[2] at Chiswick Maternity Hospital". That hospital was in Brentford and Chiswick Urban District, which was in Middlesex. See the Chiswick article if you want a more detailed explanation. You might also want to see anachronism, which is what has happened here, as happens in countless wiki articles every day. Hopefully someone will correct the infobox back to Middlesex. Further detail, if needed, can be put into the body of the article. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: The article says "replacing Ronnie James Dio at the last minute" regarding the Butterfly Ball concert on October 16 1975. Despite the fact that this comes from Ian Gillan's (auto)biography, it is wrong. Ian is mentioned in a New Musical Express article from September 20 1975 announcing that concert. As well as in an ad from October 11 in the same paper. He is also mentioned in the concert program. Linking a Facebook page with this articles wasn't proof enough, so how can I change it with having the evidence only in paper form? 2.203.233.90 (talk) 19:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butterfly Ball concert 

message: Though it's not impossible his mammy was that hep, the reference to an early musical memory of Gillan's mother playing Blue Rondo a la Turk on the piano looks questionable. The Brubeck track wasn't released until Gillan was 14, so hardly his earliest years. It seems more likely to refer to Mozart's very well known Rondo alla Turca. I don't have the given source to check. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What's more, though it may be a coincidence, during his time in Episode Six, they covered Rondo alla Turca as "Mozart Vs The Rest". Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

text: The sources says, verbatim, " then "". So I guess it's Rondo alla Turca. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More likely Mozart than Brubeck
Talk:Nooj

message: Standard naming says the character article should be just entitled "Nooj". Meyvn is simple a title like "Mr" or "Dr" and should not be the article title — Cuahl 7 July 2005 17:44 (UTC)
: Agreed.  I had proposed to move it to "Meyvn" just because the original article's (and this one in fact) title was spelled wrong.  But, just like Baralai's page isn't titled "Praetor Baralai," this page should probably just be called Nooj. --Warpedmirror 8 July 2005 02:25 (UTC)
:: I hope this gets moved soon then. I really like the way the FF articles are being tidied up serious fast. — Cuahl  8 July 2005 02:31 (UTC)
::: I've done the move. Talrias (t | e | c) 01:58, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just "Nooj"
Talk:Croydon Palace

message: Addington Palace is four miles from Croydon Palace (now 'Old Palace'). The former is on the edge of London in countryside to the southeast of Croydon. The latter is in central Croydon. They are two different buildings with distinct histories. Do not merge. Mtiedemann 01:19, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes M, have withdrawn merge notice. Croydon Palace has its own history and  continues as the "Old Palace" school for girls today. It has no direct connection with "Addington Palace". Apologies. Dieter Simon 23:50, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Bob Daisley

message: If you can confirm parts please strike out or note success or failure:
This article appears to have been the subject of hoaxing.
I can find no evidence that he played at woodstock let alone the claims that were made (and I think this is the sort of thing that would be mentioned).
Can we confirm this claim: He is famous for his catch phrase "Yee Haw Duuuuuude!" ?
The material on his relationship with Ozzy Osbourne needs to be checked.  I'm not sure it is accurately described.  
Can we confirm he smashed his bass and set it on fire?  (I know someone did but I don't know who).
(Everything else probably needs checking too).
This article has so much vandalism on it!  How stupid, he doesn't do "sweep picking" on the bass and anyone who has ever heard his playing will tell you that.  Also he is not a fan of Dr. Dre at all, I read an interview where he criticized rap music.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.202.156 (talk) 02:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification

message: Some semblence of reality now in this entry- mainly from Bob's website and other internet references- the royalty lawsuit & Daisley's major lyrical contribution to Ozzy's success has been referenced in the Ozzy entry and other applicable music places within Wickipedia. (Harryurz 11:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tidied up the entry 

message: There is mentioned that Bob plays on The ultimate sin record, wich is false (checked from liner notes). In reality Phil Soussan played on that album  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Rockter (talk • contribs) 16:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  works with Ozzy. 

message: "He continued to work with Gary Moore until recently."
Please edit - Gary Moore has been dead for over a year now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.124.11.250 (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Moore Section 
Talk:Headquarters (The Monkees album)

message: Re: "Headquarters was the third album issued by The Monkees and the first written and recorded primarily by the four members of the group, rather than by session musicians and professional songwriters.":
According to the article itself, the album had fourteen songs, six written by Monkees, one co-written by one of the Monkees. "Written...primarily" would logically have to mean most of the songs were by the Monkees, at least eight, rather than six and a half. "Recorded" is ambiguous, but in context appears to mean that the instruments were primarily played by the Monkees. According to the article itself, bass guitar on all tracks was played by session musicians and six session musicians were used altogether (outnumbering Monkees by two). On the other hand, all drum and keyboard parts appear to have been played by Monkees. Davy Jones's instrumental contributions appear to be extremely meager. Hard to measure this precisely, but it seems to me pretty much a tie and thus not "primarily" Monkees playing. In any case, I think it would be more honest for the article to say something like, "Headquarters was the third album issued by The Monkees and the first with substantial songwriting and instrumental performances by members of the group itself, rather than by session musicians and professional songwriters.TheScotch (talk) 23:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are probably right.  What is worse, though, is the abominable "session information" section, which is barely readable, especially once one gets to "Zilch". Huw Powell (talk) 06:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentence questionable 

message: Fantailfan (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Fantailfan (talk) 16:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs chart positions, certifications and track times and songwriting credits for Deluxe Edition 

message: Would it be relevant to add information on Peter Tork's lyric "What, are you kidding 
me? Psycho-Jello"? -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 04:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psycho Jello 

message: How is this album psychedelic? There are no psychedelic songs on this album, with the possible exception of "Early Morning Blues and Greens". ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 05:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Dendera

message: Does anyone know anything about a "wheel at Denderah, an Ancient Khemet wheel of the sky"? --Memenen 01:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a reference to the Dendera Zodiac; e.g., here. –Hajor 12:41, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the URL. --Memenen 00:53, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Why is there no reference to a video game that uses the Egyptian name of "Iunet" for this city in the article? The game uses known historical fact and none of the names are fake, so why isn't it mentioned? --217.43.144.95 (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iunet? 
Talk:Southern Cross (disambiguation)

message: I think we should move Southern Cross to Southern Cross (disambiguation) and move Crux to Southern Cross. If there are no objections in a week I will do it myself.
My rationale is that it is in keeping with English Wikipedia policy to use the common English name as the name of the article. I have a started a discussion about this on Talk:Crux. If we could keep the discussion in one place it would be good.
Ben Arnold 01:55, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Southern Cross (disambiguation)" 

message: I tried adding a link to the song page Southern Cross (Song) but it is worded awkwardly. Is there a consistent way of doing this? Anyway, the stub of Southern Cross (Song) is meager but I'll work on it more this upcoming week. --Jpawloski 04:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi guys, I'm fixing these up now - using the names Southern Cross (folk song) and Southern Cross (Crosby, Stills and Nash song). -- Chuq 23:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep, done - I've also redirected the (song) and (Song) pages to the disambig page. -- Chuq 23:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crosby Stills Nash "Southern Cross" 

message: asterism seems like an unusual term to use in a disambiguation page (rare term users are unlikely to be familiar with).  We do have a wiki page for it asterism, so I tried converting the term to a link, but that was reverted.  Should we just remove the term altogether then? Mathiastck (talk) 00:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fine where it is. It's linked from the lead of Crux, which is the most common thing people are looking for. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I still think asterism should be a prominent clickable link here.  Mathiastck (talk) 21:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Heh well teh word asterism got removed anyway.  If it is restored please make it a link :) Mathiastck (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  asterism?
Talk:Dyneema

message: This is a tough one: in the "Properties" section, my original language said something general about "poor wetting", which I mainly meant to refer to wetting of resin in a composite layup.  Unfortunately, this was a very clunky way to get this concept across.  A series of cosmetic fixes has led us to the current language, which says "does not get wet easliy".  "Get wet" almost universally refers to water, which mostly misses the point.  Any ideas on how to fix this?--Joel 02:09, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wetting
Talk:California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

message: I made edits showing that Cal Poly Pomona is partially located on unincorporated land, particularly an area called Ramona, which is adjacent to Pomona, per Google Maps. As you can see on the map, Cal Poly Pomona's campus is partially located in this unincorporated area. 
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ramona,+CA/@34.0616536,-117.8758907,13z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x80c329363106ad6b:0xe07b41876df0b843!8m2!3d34.0695519!4d-117.8392705!16s%2Fg%2F11t3vg_bsp
These edits were reverted simply because locals simply refer to the area as Pomona or Covina, despite not being located in either of these cities. This is similar to how locals refer to Vincent, another unincorporated community shown on Google Maps, as Covina. Sausage Link of High Rule (talk) 02:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You have some unknown intentions.  When mentioning the location, you only mention the partially unincorporated area. You don't mention the fact that Cal Poly Pomona is  partially located with the city of Pomona or that the address on W Temple is in Pomona.  You've also tried to call it within the area called Ramona which is not true.  I've never seen someone so fixated on the less relevant while trying to scrub the obvious.  It's as if you're ashamed of the Pomona association. 71.231.145.125 (talk) 19:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cal Poly Pomona is partially located on unincorporated land
Talk:List of members of the Pan-African Parliament (2004-2009)

message: I've added a former members subsection to the South Africa section. I think it would be a waste to have that info eventually only in the page's history - what do others think? 
If we keep the former members, should these be in subsections under the country sections like now, or should we make 2 main sections Current and Former with country subsections when the list of former MPs become long? I think we should already include incumbancy dates if we find it. 
If the PAP becomes like in Europe where MPs are grouped by ideology instead of nationally (which is probably inevitable), former members could have their nationality in brackets in the ideology sections, e.g.:
===Green===
*Wangari Muta Maathai (Kenya) 2007-05-31/present
*Lisa Kriel (South Africa) 2007-05-31/present
====Former members====
*Ram Ouedraogo (Burkina Faso) 2006-05-31/2007-03-15
*Adamou Garba (Niger) 2006-05-31/2007-05-31
— Jeandré, 2005-11-27t15:10z
===Work===
This article, and the articles it links to, seriously need work. Someone with more patience than I should have a look at it. —Sesel 00:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Former members?

message: This article, and the articles it links to, seriously need work. Someone with more patience than I should have a look at it. —Sesel 00:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work

message: This information is now a decade out of date. Despite my research I cant find a real list of the current members. Can someone help me find an updated list of MPs so I can update the page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngstyHippo (talk • contribs) 03:42, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update?
Talk:Man of the House (2005 film)

message: Are the 2 films unrelated, or was the newer one inspired by the older one? --SuperDude 02:20, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "one of the worst films ever set in Texas" 
I might try and fit this into the article later. -- 109.76.210.200 (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst 

message: The External links section included a link to Manofthehouse.com an online magazine for men and dads. It is not relevant to this film, but because it is irrelevant and it shares the name of this film they did a review of this film anyway to take advantage of search engines. Vaguely amusing at best. I have removed it from the article because it is irrelevant.  -- 109.76.210.200 (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:List of colleges and universities in California

message: Note that as of 2005-06-24, I am still working on this page. It may end up having a different format than the other state college lists due to the large number of colleges in California. --Cswrye 02:29, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
:I've now finished the reorganization of this page to make it consistent with other state listings. However, because of the large number of colleges in California, I'm open to using a different type of organization. --Cswrye 06:00, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
I moved the Los Angeles Music Academy from the list of Federal Institutions to the list of private schools. I think the confusion is that the school is nationally accredited. However, as a private institution, it is naturally not a Federal Institution.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:670B:9A00:D8C2:FEA3:BB25:61EA (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: first question:  what do the asterisks mean after names? eg Aliant International University.  Is it picked up the bullet (which then should be replaced by an asterisk "one of multiple locations"? 
second question.  Why the shift after California Lutheran University to bullets instead of the table?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  asterisks and tables 

message: Should the closed institutions in the table of Private colleges and universities be moved to the Defunct institutions section? I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing, so if I've missed a published guideline on this, I would appreciate a link to it.
Thanks,
Lisalibrarian (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct institutions in the table of Private colleges and universities 

message: This is a corresponding nomination to the one at the Southern California list, and the same rationale I gave there applies:   talk 06:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge we don't need two lists of colleges and universities in California, we only need one to list them. Catfurball (talk) 19:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[List of colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay Area]] into [[List of colleges and universities in California]]