Talk:Miaphysitism

message: Well, here it is.  What do ya think?  --Midnite Critic 8 July 2005 00:55 (UTC)
:Thanks for getting this going. I'll add a little more about the theology, linguistics and politics behind the stance when I can. --Gareth Hughes 00:04, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: 132.66.234.191 (talk) 12:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent article; but where is the bibliography? 

message: :Miaphysitism: Divinity and Humanity are united in one "nature" ("physis"), the two being united without separation, without confusion, and without alteration.
:Dyophysitism: Christ is one person in two natures, but emphasizes that the natures are "without confusion, without change, without division, without separation".
Is this the schism? 1 nature here and 2 nature there, and the whole googleplex of it yet having exactly identical qualities. Am I stupid, or ... ... said: Rursus (bork²) 14:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mega-Huh! 

message: I think there is a need to write full sentence(s) on the etymology of the word, Miaphysitism for better understanding. --Komitsuki (talk) 07:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miaphysitism in Greek 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miaphysitism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Category%3ACoptic_interpretations_of_the_Fourth_Ecumenical_Council
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050829144612/http://britishorthodox.org/2church.php to http://www.britishorthodox.org/2church.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Miaphysitism is Orthodox, it is not Monophysitism. Monophysite Churches are not Miaphysite. The article is almost complete rubbish as a result of this confusion. It looks more like a work of propaganda to defend the Monophysites as misunderstood which is far from the historical truth. 94.197.120.81 (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The article conflates Miaphysitism with Monophysitism

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miaphysitism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110126005953/http://www.ninesaintsethiopianorthodoxmonastery.org/id21.html to http://www.ninesaintsethiopianorthodoxmonastery.org/id21.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The current tone of this article is heavily biased towards the Chalcedonian POV. The classical Monophysite position is that Cyril of Alexandria did not countenance the idea that two natures were united in Jesus Christ but that he was simply using natural linguistic the feminine form of "one" instead of the masculine form monos of single because of the grammatical context as in simple common speech with no deep philosophical nuance intended. The position is that Cyril intended to say that Jesus Christ's humanity was only divine alone in origin. The simple commonsense linguistic point of view of the Monophysites is completely ignored by the article. Chouvrtou (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Would someone please identify the "blog or free web host" that was automatically detected in the text, so that it can be removed?  Bealtainemí (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - you can spot many blogs by searching their hostname for "wordpress.com". Unfortunately it was the Eastern Orthodox joint statement thing. Hopefully can find a reliably-published version of it all. Elizium23 (talk) 09:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Easy. Thanks. And apologies for not having put a better edit summary on my correction. Bealtainemí (talk) 11:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blog or free web host