lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jozias van Aartsen

message: Would it be appropriate to quote from this letter, even though there is no official translation, or is that original research:
Thanks for answering. This article is terrible at the moment, it really needs a lot of work. Jozias van Aartsen is one of the most important figures in Dutch politics in the last decade... he definitely deserves a better article. 217.117.170.243 22:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about letter

message: Hi unknown, 
I do not think Wiki is served with a copy in Dutch of the letter or extensive quoting from it. I think it is important to include in the article the key points with a reference to a Dutch text for fact checking V8rik 22:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To the anonymous user: please go ahead and improve the article if you feel it is not good enough, just make sure you keep the Wikipedia:Manual of Style into consideration. Regarding the letter, I think if the article was expanded substantially then it could play a role, but to add a lot of information about it into this stub doesn't seem like a good idea to me. jaco♫plane 22:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The letter is an interesting political document. Why not translating it into English and putting it on Wikisource? In that way it becomes a reliable published source from which you can quote or to which you can refer. Michel Doortmont (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about letter
Talk:József Szájer

message: For anyone who speaks Hungarian, I believe this citation below might be useful for filling in some of the inline citation gaps in the article.
TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 15:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations needed 

message: One of the categories of this article is 'Hungarian Roman Catholics'. However, I can find no source saying this; not even the Hungarian Wikipedia article has anything. If there's a reliable source, this information can also go in the Infobox, but I'm primarily concerned about the category; it's been on this article for years, having been added by an IP back on 4 May 2015. Until a reliable source can be found, I'm going to remove the category for the time being. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 15:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Roman Catholic' 

message: Some Hungarian media are spreading conspiracy theories about the sex affair. I cited two sources in the German wikipedia, but I guess it's no use citing German sources here. 46.114.137.17 (talk) 20:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see what you're referring to in the German article, but regardless, citing non-English sources here is fine. Most citation templates support a "language" field, so just add "language=de" to your citation. This article already has a number of Hungarian sources that you can use as models. -Elmer Clark (talk) 21:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  conspiracy theories spread by media close to Fidesz 

message: shouldn't inclusion of awards be accompanied by a mention of whatever the contribution was that merited such award? Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 15:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards
Talk:JP Dellacamera

message: What makes these so memorable? They look like pretty generic play-by-plays. Just curious. 66.170.212.17 (talk) 19:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorable calls from Dellacamera 
Talk:Juan Antonio Flecha

message: This years he appears on Eurosport as commentator/expert or interviewer during Giro. (I am not sure how to call his role.) Is this notable enough to be mentioned in the article? --Kompik (talk) 12:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Work for Eurosport
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual § Other.  Specifically, please see entry on the list entitled Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles. Thanks! HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 18:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual#Other|Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual §&nbsp;Other]]

message: I have created Draft:WikiProject food and drink industry in England. The main article bein Food and drink industry in England, but there are many other articles that can be added to the wiki project.
I am looking for members to work on the articles, create new articles as necessary, expand and maintain current article and hopefully get these articles onto the Good article list. 
I have requested help on the  Teahouse as well as making the request on the WikiProject.  ChefBear01 (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @ChefBear01, a WP:WikiProject is a group of contributors.  If you don't already have a group, then you've probably wasted your time in creating pages for the (non-existent) group to coordinate their work on.   I suggest that you join Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink instead of trying to create a splinter group. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject 

message: I would like to suggest that we resume discussion of this topic, at least for a little while longer. I think that there are some interesting ideas here, perhaps we could discuss further, before this gets archived. I hope to add some comments myself a little later, but first I'd like to read this over, and give this a little thought. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: New section for discussion, June 4 2024

message: FYI  has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.244.143 (talk) 04:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: {{template|Project section header}}
Talk:Juan Castro

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. The baseball player was shown to have an apparent lead in usage (albeit not as firm as I'd like), and the long-term significance was cited to support a no-primary situation in the first place, and thus does not sufficiently counterweigh the usage lead. In the end, the scales are tipped towards the baseball player remaining primary. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 June 2022
Talk:Juan Dixon

message: He parted ways with Coppin State  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:C403:8A9:FCDE:EF41:F4A:359C (talk) 01:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Juan Encarnación

message: There is a casualness evident by use of the first name Juan in parts of this article that make it seem less professional and neutral.  I'll make the changes, but it's up for discussion.
Wideeyedraven 23:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Casualness
Talk:Juanfran (footballer, born 1976)

message: This article says that he finished his career at Levante, but the Levante article lists "Juanfran" as the current, active captain. Are these the same person? If so, one of the articles is wrong. Either this Juanfran hasn't finished his career anywhere, or the Levante article should reflect the fact that this Juanfran has retired. I'm willing to edit this one, but I would prefer not to figure out which Juanfran is which. I'm also skeptical that Juanfran really should be listed under his nickname "Juanfran" and not some version of his proper name, perhaps "Juanfran Garcia" or something, but I'm even less willing to go digging into the frequency of usage in reliable, English-language sources. Rks13 (talk) 16:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Juanfran? 
Talk:Juan Ignacio Chela

message: Is there any way to write in his drug offence without it appearing to be vandalism? I am sure people would like to know why he is listed under 'athletes banned for doping offences' but as it was prior to his career taking off I am unsure of how to include it in article. Pierricbross (talk) 00:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thiruvankulam

message: There is already a page called Thiruvamkulam to describe the same place. I guess the article on Thiruvamkulam should be moved under Thiruvankulam as the latter is used in government records and phonetically right. --geordee (talk) 21:54, 14 August 2006 07:39 (UTC)
Finally, I have moved the page under Thiruvankulam. Along with that changes are made to correct facts, spelling and documentation standards. --geordee (talk) 22:30, 14 August 2006 07:39 (UTC)
I have checked the following websites to verify the spelling.
http://www.kerala.gov.in/dept_panchayat/telnoof_ekm.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040616075334/www.censusindia.net/results/town.php?stad=A&state5=999
--geordee (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sanja (talk show)

message: please delete this article and start one about the Sanja festival held in Tokyo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.186.233 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 14 August 2006
: Sorry, Wikipedia doesn't work like that. Otherwise, I'd delete this article & replace it with Sanja (woreda). Although it might be time to turn this into a disambiguation page. -- llywrch 02:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Melchoir 02:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, feel free to write something at Sanja (festival). Melchoir 02:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Juan Manuel Vargas

message: Does he holds Italian nationality in order not occupied the quota? Matthew_hk tc 16:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Second nationality

message: Stop posting transfer "rumors" all over the page until anything is actually said  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.124.41 (talk) 06:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer "rumors"
Talk:Juan Maldacena

message: I'm wondering if L. Susskind's description of Maldecena as "Juan Maldecena is perhaps the greatest physicist of his generation...certainly the greatest theoretical physicist of his generation." should be noted in this article? Citation: Cornell Messenger Lecture Series, Lecture 2 (April 2X, 2014) quote from video at ~ 1 hr 8 min 50 seconds; http://www.cornell.edu/video/leonard-susskind-2-black-holes-conservation-of-information-holographic-principle. Although Susskind is co-author on at least 2 of Maldecena's papers, he seems potentially a sufficiently emminent physicist for his opinion to carry some authority/weight. Seems noteworthy to me; if others agree and are willing to paste it in, then please go for it. (I can't be counted on to return/monitor Wikipedia pages.)72.172.1.6 (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: P.S. "mal de cena" is literally translated as "bad dinner".72.172.1.6 (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance? 
Talk:Juan Matta-Ballesteros

message: This is a follow-up to the previous section. The article originally had the following paragraph:
:According to a 1978 DEA intelligence report, Matta had become business partners with General Policarpo Paz García, and had directly financed the Honduran "Cocaine Coup" that brought Paz into power. Under Paz, Matta's trafficking operations received protection and support from the Honduran armed forces, in exchange for a cut of the proceeds from the drugs.
The ultimate source of this claim is James Mills book, Underground Empire.  This is a highly unreliable work to put it mildly, certainly inadequate for BLP standards, should have been deleted long ago.  Please comment here before restoring. Rgr09 (talk) 07:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cocaine coup
Talk:Juan Ponce Enrile

message: "Enrile knew that he had to break away from the increasingly unpopular Marcos dictatorship."
Although a very plausible explanation for his actions, not something fit for an encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notneps (talk • contribs) 19:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing 

message: to Filipino celebtrities or politicians unless you have a source to back it up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.125.216.237 (talk) 04:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop adding Spanish, Chinese, Japanese, Indian, or American descent 

message: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/151905/a-life-in-the-day-of-juan-ponce-enrile --seav (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A nice source for the background of JPE 

message: If his parents were not married, surely his surname is Furagganan not Enrile?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The Feb 14 1924 date has been in the article for years, but has been subject to significant vandalism and appears to be unsourced. Can anyone provide a reliable source for this date (or whatever date)?
:Never mind, his Senate bio http://www.senate.gov.ph/senators/sen_bio/enrile_resume.asp confirms it. Meters (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth date 

message: JPE being immortal became a meme about 3 years ago, because of that, this article has been subjected to repeated vandalisms including changing "The Honorable" to "The Immortal" and also changing his birthdate to 1,000 B.C (something like that) Damskiee29 (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's very annoying. The page needs to be locked. --Jkaharper (talk) 11:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Immortal
Talk:Juan R. Torruella

message: I'm taking out the pronunciation . Distinctly odd, and don't know where it came from. kwami (talk) 05:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Juan R. Torruella was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Did this person competed in the 1964 Summer Olympics for  in the Finn (dinghy) (Sailing)? The age and background fit.NED33 (talk) 13:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And in Flying Dutchman (dinghy) 1968.NED33 (talk) 21:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And in Flying Dutchman in 1972NED33 (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summer Olympics of 1964
Talk:Castaways of the Flying Dutchman

message: So something that has bothered me since i read this book, what is the deal with the dog?  According to the book, Denmark is a Labrador Retriever picked up in a Danish port in the 17th century.  The Labrador wasn't officially a breed until the early 1800s.  Before that, there were ancestors of the Dog known as St. John's Water Dog, but they were more or less restricted to the shores of Newfoundland until they were discovered by British Gentry.  So how is it that everyone knows Ned's breed right off the bat, 200 years before it even came into prominence?  For that matter, what was a Labrador doing in the middle of a Danish Port in the first place?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.103.217 (talk) 14:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin of Ned 

message: This article mentions the angel as "he", however, the book says that the angel is genderless, suggest "he/she"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.85.41 (talk) 01:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender of angel
Talk:Tabernacle of Unity

message: is it possible to find the Persian original of that Tablet (Lawh-i Haft Pursish), or where could it be found? Ryesiloglu (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Persian (or Arabic) of Tablet of the Seven Questions

message: Does anyone possess a digital version of this title? - Wiki-uk 16:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been looking for it as well, and haven't seen it yet. -- Jeff3000 16:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Digital version available?
Talk:Juan Ramón Verón

message: Just wondering, why is the above the bar at the bottom of this page? Is being the coach of this squad a particularly great achievement of Veron's? It seems like there could be something more suitable or important there instead, or just remove it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.135.127 (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996 Guatemala CONCACAF Gold Cup Squad? 
Talk:Juan Urdangarín y de Borbón

message: Unlike the article says, the members of the Spanish Royal House are only King Felipe VI, Queen Letizia, the Princess of Asturias, Infanta Sofia, King Juan Carlos, and Queen Sofia. Infantas Elena and Cristina and their respective children are in the line of succession, but are not members of the Royal House. Please correct that information on the article. 161.24.19.44 (talk) 13:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Membership of the Royal House
Talk:Sirshasana

message: There's already a head stand page, that lists the Sanskrit as Sirsasana. However, in doing research for that page I found this other spelling. I'm certainly not an expert on Sanskrit; now what? Jacqui★ 16:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that all the information about the yoga posture be merged into Sirshasana, and let the info about breakdance remain in the head stand page with a note that 'head stand' can also mean sirshasana. I say this because all other yoga postures are named in their respective sanskrit names, and it's better not to have information about the same thing scattered across different articles. ~ srini 08:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A merge makes sense, but I think it would be best to find a consequent line and stick to it. Although there is a wide trend of taking S shounds in Sanskrit and spelling it sh, allowing for confusing variants shirsasana, sirshasana, shirshasana et al, I'd vote to redirect the variants to the simple sirsasana. Head stand is a frequently used word among non-hindi yoga practicioners, so if that is to become a break dance article, there ought to be some disambiguation.. Murgh 19:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Juanita Castro

message: *"That's what we really want for our homeland, democracy, freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of movement. All that's what we want and we've struggled for that, at least I have for many years, I've fought for that. And I'm Cuban. "
I moved the above quote from Juanita Castro to Talk:Juanita Castro because the cite link was dead, archive.org has no record, and google finds only Wikipedia. -Wikianon (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes 

message: Are there any other sources other than quotations from this woman & the rest of her family who are against the Cuban communists?207.216.33.144 (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything else on this woman? 

message: *Cuban leader's sister not crying, not cheering
I moved the above link from Juanita Castro to Talk:Juanita Castro because the link was dead, archive.org has no record, and search miami.com does not find it. Google finds some hits quoting miami herald, for example: http://www.redorbit.com/news/international/598612/cuban_leaders_sister_not_crying_not_cheering/index.html, but not a link to miami.com. -Wikianon (talk) 12:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:Juanita M. Kreps

message: I removed the reference to her being the only female commerce secretary as of 2006, as it is incorrect. Tooptoo 18:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juanita Moore

message: Is the correct date of death December 31, 2013 or January 1, 2014? The referenced obituary says that she died on Tuesday (Dec. 31). --Silvonen (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added AP source that says Wednesday. I'm guessing she died overnight and was found Jan 1. When that happens, news sources vary. AP is a safe bet, in my opinion. — Wyliepedia 05:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Enterprise 2.0

message: I made a history undelete request.  Would like to look into the rationale for the initial deletion, how the article got restarted and build a case for the merit of the article with the most latest content Rossmay 18:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  history undelete 

message: I was expecting there to be a discussion and some sort of consensus process - look at the "pro" and "con" aspects of the "web 2.0" article. Personally, I'd like to see this article develop with some "meat" given that I have been researching on my own how individual companies are -- or are not -- adopting "web 2.0" based systems such as blogs and wikis. "Enterprise 2.0" may not be a label that appeals to all but there's some meat here that should be thrashed out in the open. 
NOte that this is also my first time use of editing in Wikipedia - I was not aware that the "delete" process was so straightforward. Reminds me that in an enterprise application ("enterprise 2.0"?) of wiki technology a disgruntled employee shouldn't be able to go in and just wipe something out ... or not? - DDMcD, Aug 16, 2006.
:Sorry to come back to you so late...as you can see on my userpage, I'm not really able to contribute right now; as to your query: bring this up at Wikipedia:Deletion review; the pertaining article was speedy deleted by me as a recreated article which went through Afd. I still think the subject is not notable enough to warrant an article. Lectonar 14:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It wasn't a recreated article, considering the diff  b/t before and after content.  Just b/c an article was once a deletable stub doesn't mean that noone can ever create something under that title without a deletion review.  +sj + 23:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry: speedy deleted see here, and Afd means that this article went through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, as it is archived on the project page here. Cheers Lectonar 20:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This wasn't a proper application of speedy deletion guidelines.  The new article was vastly different form the old; it should at most suffer through a new AFD, and it might be polite to start by discussing with the article editors on the article talk page, since it is being so actively edited by multiple users (deleting a page under active development for "non-notability" is both rude and counterproductive... just explain what the notability guidelines are and suggest how they might be fulfilled by better research and referencing).  +sj + 23:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsure of rules
Talk:Focus II

message: The text added on 17th August is inaccurate and non-NPOV (e.g. "greatest progressive rock instrumental"). A section describing each track is to be welcomed however, so I have not removed it. I'll try to tidy it up. Best Witchwooder (talk) 08:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV text added 17/8/09 

message: Why has this article been moved? This album was originally released in the USA and UK as Moving Waves. Surely this English language article should reflect that?
best Witchwooder (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also confused. It says "More known under the name "Moving Waves", the album art says Moving Waves... I don't see any reason why this article is called "Focus II".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.49.67.27 (talk) 18:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus II? 