Talk:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

message: It also pays no mention to the fact that it hasn't been ratified, nor is likely to be anytime soon, since many of the 44 required ratifications are not going to happen.  
     That sounds like a political statement from a neocon to me.
:In this wording, yes.  The statement that ratification is unlikely in the near future, however, is quite neutral and realistic given the IND<>PAK and USA<>DPRK deadlocks, in addition to the U.S. Senate's rejection.  --QEDquid 10:21, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlikely to be ratified?

message: I don't think the introduction to this article is very clear. It says that it needs to be ratified by 11 more countries, and then in the sidebar it says it needs to be ratified by 44 more countries. Which is correct? Atinoda 04:12, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the sidebar says 44 total, and the text says 11 more (3 to sign, 8 to ratify).  I've re-written this a bit, let me know if it is clearer now. --QEDquid 10:21, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: The correct full name of the treaty appears to be "Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty" . In the article the name is given as "Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty". But neither of these are the article name, or indeed redirect here.
I propose the article be moved to "Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty".  Any objections? Rwendland 13:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: Whoever was responsible for the bold (typeface) editorial questions in the main text, knock it off.  That discussion goes on this page, not the article.  Moonsword 14:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold editorial statements 

message: Why is this treaty not being enforced? Even if the US doesn't sign, surely there's value in enforcing it?   —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]comment added by 62.31.33.21 (talk) 23:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Legally, it can't come into force until the 44 Annex 2 states have ratified it. --84.112.145.34 (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enforcement 

message: A map would be useful here to show which states are signatories and which states have ratified this treaty. Basically, a wikified version of this map. Thanks to anyone who can help. --Allstar86 (talk) 10:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. Stuck with the existing map and updated legend. --Allstar86 (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested map 

message: As you can see here, the correct name is "comprehensive nuclear test-ban treaty", with online one hyphen between "test" an "ban". I don't know why, but the organization uses two hyphens (like in the article's title). --79.238.114.45 (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an error in the document you linked to.  There should be a hyphen between "nuclear" and "test" as well, see here (pdf of the Treaty). --Richardrj talk email 14:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: What is Annex 2? The article is not clear.
:Annex 2 of the CTBT is the list of 44 countries who must ratify before the treaty can enter into force. NPguy (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Annex 2

message: The health concerns that scientists and media were raising at the time of the ban?--Senor Freebie (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No comment on 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150403215147/https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&id=488&chapter=26&lang=en to http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&id=488&chapter=26&lang=en
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060614010121/http://www.ippnw.org/NukeNPTPrepCom2003EPWs.html to http://www.ippnw.org/NukeNPTPrepCom2003EPWs.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101218010654/http://www.blip.tv/file/1662914 to http://blip.tv/file/1662914/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110303215535/http://opencrs.com/document/RL33548/ to https://opencrs.com/document/RL33548/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927013430/http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2008/the-russian-federations-support-for-thecomprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty/14-october-2008-page-2/?textonly=1 to http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2008/the-russian-federations-support-for-thecomprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty/14-october-2008-page-2/?textonly=1
*Added  tag to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/07/18/203804.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Yep. 2A00:1370:8184:1CE9:604C:4B49:D0CC:82FE (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia appears to exit this today