lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:La Romana, Dominican Republic

message: In the "History" section of the article, we see:
"In early 1960, Gulf and Western Industries, Inc. purchased the sugar mill and started to invest in the livestock industry which was cemented in the province."
Just what does this mean anyway, how is an industry "cemented"? Or could they have meant "centered"? I was in La Romana a few years back and was well aware of its huge sugar industry, but is there also a "cement industry"? The Spanish article says:
"A principios de 1960, Gulf and Western Industries, Inc. compró el molino de azúcar y empezó a invertir en la industria ganadera y cementera de la provincia.", which translates to:
"At the beginning of 1960, Gulf and Western Industries, Inc. bought the sugar mill and began investing in the livestock and cement industry in the province."
I don't know if the Spanish version of the article is any more accurate. ¿Hay algún wikipedista que vive en La Romana o quien ha visitado el lugar recientemente que pueda clarificar todo esto? DutchmanInDisguise (talk) 03:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cement?
Talk:Jimaní

message: The last sections in these article are bad (extremely bad) of an article in Wiki Dominicana, an article where there is not a single reference. I do not know the copyright policy of Wiki Dominicana but you have to assume that those articles are copyrighted; in any case, it is very unethical to copy (even if translated) complete articles of another website. And I have doubts on the photos. There is not a Sierra de Jimaní in the Dominican Republic and the city is not close to the Enriquillo Lake. The photo in the Infobox is from Haiti, even if it is close to the border. --Jmarcano (talk) 21:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad translation
Talk:30 by Ella

message: :Image:30byElla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:30byElla.jpg
Talk:Cotuí

message: Quita Sueno was previously nonexistant and Quita Sueño redirected here, where that name is entirely unused, unexplained, and unsourced and is totally absent from the Wikidata item. Both namespaces will now point to Genovesa Island in the Galapagos, which did have that name, does use it, does have reliable sources for it, and does have that included in its Wikidata. If there is some way that Quita Sue(n|ñ)o does refer to Cotui or something in it, go ahead and change Quita Sueño to a dab page and change Quita Sueno to point at Quita Sueño. — LlywelynII 23:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Quita Sueno
Talk:Comendador, Dominican Republic

message: The law states that the city is named just Comendador; Comendador de Lares is the name of an historic person and the city was named after him but without Lares. I do not make the needed changes because there are too many errors. So pleas, go back to the original version. Pepemar2 (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the city is simply Comendador 

message: The last Dominican census was in 2002 and these are the official population figures for the country and de communities. If you are going to put an estimate for another year from a reliable source, please put the reference.  tends to put imaginary figures, even for small islands that are not inhabited. And the flag in the template is under serious doubts so take the flag out or do not use the template. --Jmarcano (talk) 00:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population figures 
Talk:Baní

message: The original text referred to people in Bani having close ties with "does of Spain", which I'm assuming was supposed to be "those of Spain." Also, seems to be copyedited fine, so am removing needs copyedit tag. --Natalie 03:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyediting 
Talk:Rivière Soliette

message: According to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency there's no river with the name Jimani existing in Haiti and the Arroyo Jimani in the Dominican Republic is near Santo Domingo, quite a long distance away.
However researching showed that the river is called Rivière Soliette in Haiti and Arroyo Blanco in the Dominican Republic. There's existing a set of name variants, see here: Río Solheillet, Rivière Soleillet (and some other variations can be googled). See also  this source (en espanol). Therefor I will move that article tonight or tomorrow. --Matthiasb (talk) 10:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the river
Talk:Artibonite River

message: Near what town does the Artibonite River empty into the Gulf of Gonâve?
CountMacula (talk) 19:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There does not seem to be a real city closeby as you can see with google maps. Knopffabrik (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does the river enter the gulf?
Talk:La Romana International Airport

message: The current La Romana airport replaced an earlier airport which was just on the bottom of Casa de Campo, approximately south of the Zona Franca. The runway stretched over part of the golf course. It was in use until the early 2000´s when the new airport was opened to take all the air traffic..... does the old airport still exist...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.198.113.130 (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old La Romana Airport
Talk:Gregorio Luperón International Airport

message: I've put up a picture of the tail of a 737 with Pico Isabel del Torro in the background. I think this shows the location and surroundings well. The previous photo was simply of an aircraft sitting on the tarmac. This doesn't show anything about the airfield and could have been taken anywhere. Please stop changing it back to this photo. Martin Le Roy (Usbob) 16:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airfield Photo
Talk:Estadio Olímpico Juan Pablo Duarte

message: It seems that Estadio Olímpico Juan Pablo Duarte and Estadio Felix Sanchez are two articles on the same subject. They should be merged, and one title redirected to the other one. I have no opinion on which should be the article and which the redirect. Gentgeen (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Peter Bagge

message: Is there any evidence given for the inclusion of the Libertarian tag? --Deville (Talk) 23:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: considering he has been a regular contributor (since 2000) of a monthly comic strip (2-4 pages long) to Reason magazine, the leading Libertarian monthly, yeah.  --Emb021 20:59, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Older mods
Talk:40 Dayz & 40 Nightz

message: :Image:40 Dayz & 40 Nightz.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:40 Dayz & 40 Nightz.JPG
Talk:The Arrival (1996 film)

message: it is real! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.15.195.135 (talk • contribs).
:Please do not post statements such as this. If you want to tell the world about the reverse-joint aliens, please do it in a more meaningful way. WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL  Masterof148 08:57, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  oh my god 

message: ...is nothing but one big spoiler! Half the fun of the picture are the surprises it springs on the viewer. Rather than rewriting the summary, I will a big WARNING! notice. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The plot summary...

message: There is another earlier movie of the same name []. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 21:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Arrival (1991) 

message: Why is there no mention of the sequel? Every other film with a sequel has it listed in it's article. Gil gosseyn (talk) 06:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The sequel
Talk:Aerolíneas de El Salvador

message: Aerolíneas de El Salvador
Aerolíneas de El Salvador or AESA was a Salvadoran airline formed after the merging of TAES and TACA El Salvador, both domestic airlines using Dakota YS-53-C. A small collection of Douglas C-47 and DC-3 were Aerolíneas de El Salvador's main fleet. Founded in 1960.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.4.251.21 (talk) 06:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Families Acting for Innocent Relatives

message: This article needs sourcing. I wikified the set-up, but certain parts of the article appear to either be biased, or misleading. SOURCES ARE NEEDED!!! Strongfaithin1 23:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know much about the subject matter but much of this article seems to be written from an anti-Families Acting for Innocent Relatives point of view.  I have tried to correct this as much as I can but it would benefit from an editer who has a better understanding of the issues.  
I wanted to not that I completely removed the following block quote from the ==Controversies== section.  Its inclusion lacked neutrality and does nothing, in my opinion, for the clarity of the article.  I don't think that this type of viewpoint is helpful in an encyclopedic entry.  I put it here in case folks feel a need to discuss my decision.
Susan McKay, the author of Northern Protestants:  An Unsettled People has said: Bitter hatreds that underpin Love Ulster parade in Dublin, Susan McKay, Irish Times, Feb 25th 2005.
[1] ^  McKay, Susan (2005). Northern Protestants: An unsettled people. The Blackstaff Press. .
Hippychick 02:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Proposals for change can be discussed here. Wholesale deletion of referenced content you don't like is unreasonable. --Flexdream (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not about like or dislike, this is an encyclopaedia. Content that does not use Wikipedia style (e.g. bracketed "source" after various sentences, rather than ref tags) is highly likely to be fixed or deleted. Likewise interpretations that are not supported by the cited source, and any terminology that suggests a point of view that is not neutral as regards the subject of the article. I have reworked that section to take in the more significant of your points from the News Letter pieces, but omitted minor details that give undue weight to this section - e.g. a WP article doesn't need to tell the world what the ex-leader of a minor party felt about this or that. Brocach (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Broach. That's a much more helpful approach than previous. Thanks for the edits. I wouldn't be so dismissive of Empey and I'll have to think if it's best to quote him and others may have a view, but you have now left the reference in. I've no objection to 'fixing' tags, but I do object to that being used as a reason to delete content. What you've done now is much better than the previous attempts to delete sections and which seriously unbalanced the article. It always best to leave claims and counter-claims in and let the reader make their own judgement. Regards. --Flexdream (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies
Talk:La Unión, El Salvador

message: This capitalization fix should be non-controversial. It needs an administrator to do it because the correct title has some past edit history. --Russ Blau (talk) 20:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Move request fulfilled. SoLando (Talk) 13:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Santa Tecla, El Salvador

message: A lot of this reads like it was poorly translated from Spanish, and could use revision. Anomaly17 (talk) 20:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality prose
Talk:GURPS In Nomine

message: I notice from the stub tag this article has something to do with role playing games. Besides that isolated tag, a reader has no any way of knowing what this article is about. Xientist 23:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RPGs

message: I think this would work better as a subsection on the main In Nomine page. There's not too many differences between the GURPS version and the core rules. --Deafgeek 10:04, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed Percy Snoodle 11:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to In Nomine
Talk:San Salvador (volcano)

message: Added alot of geological type data, will add more references and link it to the correct sections later Ukiedukie 14:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geological data

message: I've redirected Quezaltepec here. I hope it is the same (looks like a mispelling of Quetzaltepec). Please check that article's edit history to check if there is something there worth merging here. Nabla (talk) 23:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quezaltepec
Talk:Grant McLennan

message: "one of the most internationally influential indie rock bands from Australia."
Surely you need to have some kind of a source for this sort of statement? Actually, now that I think about it, most of this information belongs on a page about the band, not Grant McLennan. Bihal 23:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Why is he suddenly Jack McLennan in the 2nd para? SpoolWhippets (talk) 12:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack? 
Talk:NOR logic

message: Unless I'm very much mistaken the references in the tables headers to NAND in this article should be NOR. I suspect this is a cut and paste error from the NAND article.
:It was based on the NAND logic article. I presumed they had all been caught out. Obviously, I was wrong. Will (message me!) 21:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why does this article assume that it is popularly thought that computers are designed using only one type of gate? Is there any reason to believe that this is what most people think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.102.98 (talk) 23:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In my experience this is indeed what a lot of people believe; however, I don't have any sources for this claim (which would be hard to verify). A rewording might be in order. Adrianwn (talk) 10:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Belief 

message: This article could use the SVG graphics at User:Booyabazooka/SVG#Logic_gates WP 08:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG 

message: The following diagram shows all binary logical connectives expressed only by NOR operations, represented by the black circles. I propose to include it at the end of the article, to show, how the functions themselves are interlaced - not only the logic gates in some computer. 
When I included this file in the Logical NOR article, the reactions have been quite bad, and in a discussion we came to the conclusion, that it doesn't match there. As the diagram reflects quite exactly the content of this article, I think it matches here. If you agree, feel free to include it. Lipedia (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hasse diagram

message: Maybe add some sort of section to show how to come up with 3 input gates? For example, a 3 input OR gate made up of 2 input NOR gates. There doesn't seem to be anywhere on Wikipedia that can explain how 3 (or even 4) input gates excluding small notes that they exist. — ク Eloc 貢 06:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 input gates 

message: The section on turning a NOR gate into a NOR gate seems frivolous.  Should it be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanscottdaniels (talk • contribs) 22:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using a NOR to make a NOR
Talk:Bōkun Habanero

message: Is this a brand name of a snack or is it a snack as are potato chips? "snack consists of potato rings" For some reason, I think it "consists of" more than potato rings -- I'm guessing it also "consists of" at least salt and some sort of oil. That's an odd construct anyway. Do roads "consist of" pavement? Xientist 23:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What are these?
Talk:Chinese folk art

message: Where's the stub tag? In a nation several billion strong, all we can learn about their "folk art" is that one of their arts is puppetry? Xientist 23:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Earl.Bondoc.
:The teacher should've followed up better. They're the ones whose names and accounts need to be here, not the students. — LlywelynII 00:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: No, it doesn't. It means jade. The character has some relation to 王 and 国 but it isn't a one-for-one correspondence any more than 江 "means" useful water. — LlywelynII 00:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: "Yu means royal stone"
Talk:Are You Afraid of the Dark?

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes § Questioning calling first revival "season 6" and "season 7" – we need to reorganize this page.  Discussion is on how to handle identifying the "seasons" of the two revival series (1999–2000) and (2019). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:List of Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes#Questioning calling first revival "season 6" and "season 7" – we need to reorganize this page|Talk:List of Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes §&nbsp;Questioning calling first revival "season 6" and "season 7" – we need to reorganize this page]]

message: I've worked on reorganizing List of Are You Afraid of the Dark? episodes lately, and I think this article could use a similar reorganization.
I would advise reorganizing this article to mostly focus on the original 1991–1996 series, and then put both revivals (1999 and 2019) in their own dedicated sections, themselves containing subsections to cover things like 'Cast', etc. This is already being done somewhat in terms of the second (2019) revival, but is not being done this way at all in terms of the first (1999) revival series.
IOW, the "main" 'Cast' section at this article should again focus primarily on the series' original (1991–1996) cast, with the dedicated sections on the two revival series dealing with their casting (and production) within those sections.
Right now, I'm just proposing this, so I'm interested in hearing comments and feedback here. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This article continues to get worse, because we aren't dealing with each revival in separate sections. The article should generally focus on the original series, and then the revivals should be dealt with in dedicated sections within the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganizing this article: Putting the 'First revival' in its own dedicated section 

message: Please do not use the art of the title site as a source for this article. It openly states it pulls information from IMDb, which makes it fail WP:RS/IMDb. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Art of the title

message: Would it possible to add a separate section for The Midnight Society and their members? I know their listed on the cast section. 
Maybe a little back ground on how the society was formed and relations of the characters, Mollymiller (talk) 09:58, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Midnight Society Section 

message: Is the show coming back in 2023 or is the series silently pulled? I saw the hidden note in edit mode. Cwater1 (talk) 04:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's been a full year and no official renewal has been made, we can say that it is over. BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: True Cwater1 (talk) 16:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023
Talk:SBC Long Distance

message: Is this article even necessary? Redirect to AT&T? --Jon Cates 00:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Moving this page merely because of a d/b/a name was not logical. Note that the Bell Operating Companies of AT&T aren't moved to AT&T Kansas, etc. for a reason. SBC Long Distance LLC is the true, legal name of the company that does business as AT&T Long Distance. Therefore, this page should be moved to SBC Long Distance. KansasCity 15:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding "LLC" violates Wikipedia naming conventions on names for companies. KansasCity 07:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Support. Good job working towards consistency in the naming of the phone company articles. Dekimasuよ! 12:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 19:01, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move back to SBC Long Distance