Talk:Dead end street

message: 120px|right|thumb|Accidentally created cul-de-sac [...]
Why is the cul-de-sac on this image so accidental?
--Abdull 03:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (moved image to right so as to not upset alignment of replies)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Node ue (talk • contribs) 11:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidentally 

message: I don't recall ever hearing this word growing up in Connecticut. They were always just 'courts.' Is this a regional phrase?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregbard (talk • contribs) 02:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in Arizona we aren't... --Node 10:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've definitely used this phrase since I was a child, too, and I'm from Jersey. --12.3.61.131 (talk) 18:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialect 

message: Please see Prescriptivism. While the etymologically correct form may well be "culs-de-sac", anyone who used that nowadays where I live, even in an academic paper, would be seen as pretentious or even wrong. "culs de sac" finds less than 100K results on Google (many of which are just people lecturing others about how it is the correct plural), while "cul de sacs" finds over 600K. I don't really care which one this article uses, but I do think the sentence about the correct plural form needs to be taken out of the introductory paragraph (and preferrably out of the article altogether) as it is clearly not the majority form. --Node 10:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I checked on Google to see if "culs-de-sac" was more common than "cul-de-sacs" in any of the «primary» English-speaking countries (US, CA, UK, IE, AU, NZ, IN, SG, ZA, NG...) and have found that it is not. It appears to be more common in some than in others (ratios are roughly 1:18 US, 1:82 CA, 1:4 UK, 1:44 IE, 1:37 AU, 1:5 NZ, 1:19 IN, 1:5 SG, 1:7 ZA, 0 NG, although there were less than 100 results for either in India and Singapore). It seems to me from these results (excluding Singapore and India due to relative paucity of data) that the use of "culs-de-sac" as a plural is somewhat regional, being well-accepted though not used by the majority in the UK, New Zealand, and South Africa, while in all others it is relatively foreign and unused. Note that in Canadian results I filtered for language, because if French-language results are not filtered out the ratio is 1:2, and if only French is allowed, the result is more like 5:1. --Node 10:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct plural form 

message: Why these two points are not together?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.221.101 (talk) 14:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why there exist separately both "Cul-de-sac (disambiguation)" and "Other uses"? 

message: aren't cul-de-sacs normally differentiated from a normal dead-end because there are no corners in them?  A dead-end can have corners but I always thought a cul-de-sac was rounded at the end.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.186.193.229 (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering that myself. Here in North Carolina, I always learned that cul-de-sacs were the ones with rounded ends, and a road that just stopped was a dead end. It seems there must be a difference of some kind, even if it's just in my state's DOT because they don't use Dead End signs in the rounded areas. They usually use No Outlet signs there instead, but my road had a Dead End sign. Suamme1 16:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think cul de sacs are the roundabout of dead-ends. Once one drives into a cul de sac, just keep turning and you will leave. Exiting a dead-end is much more laborious. -Henry W. Schmitt 17:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also associate "cul-de-sacs" with ends where you can turn a vehicle around and "dead ends" with more abrupt street endings, but apparently the sources use them interchangably. If a source can be found that explains the difference, it should be added to the article, but it needs to be noted that the two terms are also used interchangably. The NPR source and the William Safire source both use the two terms interchangably. Noroton (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All cul-de-sacs are dead ends, but not all dead ends are cul-de-sacs.  Heck, there are some dead end streets or roads that don't even have any houses or buildings surrounding them! I think a distinction should be made between cul-de-sacs specifically designed & built in housing developments from streets and roads which formerly were throughfares but were partially closed-off for varying reasons to form dead ends.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanoman (talk • contribs) 04:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an accurate description of the relationship. As Suamme1 noted, a cul-de-sac is a specific tytpe of dead end with a rounded end for allowing for easy turning. Either the articles for cul-de-sac and dead end should be split or the article should be made to refer to dead ends with a specific cul-de-sac section. Introw (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

text: I have always known cul-de-sac as a short indented area off the main street with 4-5 houses on a semi-circle. If there is any road then it will be a dead-end street, even if it has a turn around. I live on one of these, and have never called it a cul-de-sac. Also, I'm not aware that these dead-end streets often have connecting trails at the end.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.102.195.127 (talk) 17:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: Shouldn't the text at the beginning have a translation? --escondites 17:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not quite sure what you mean.  It states in the second paragraph that it translates to "bottom of the bag". --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 22:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

text: In British English "ass" is another word of donkey, what you are referring to is an "arse", which is why ass is not a good example, butt is commonly used for the end of a cigarette, rump in this context is archaic (in 1659 the populace of London roasted the rumps of animals to show their dislike for the Rump Parliament), fanny has a totally different meaning in British English, and prat means fool. -- PBS (talk) 10:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  French text 

message: "... its modern use is to calm vehicle traffic. It has also been accused of creating communities which require the use of a car and are badly connected for pedestrians and cyclists."
It is important to remember that it is possible to build cul-de-sacs such that there are still route for pedestrians and cyclists.  This encourages walking and cycling whilst still providing all the benefits of traffic calming.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.163.165.185 (talk) 11:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic Calming 

message: The article says the French use a specific road sign. In fact it is not just French:
Image:Italian traffic signs - strada senza uscita.svg|Italy
Image:Finland road sign 651.svg|Finland
Image:CZ road sign IP-10a.svg|Czech republic
Image:Zeichen 357 - Sackgasse, StVO 1992.svg|Germany
Image:Nederlands_verkeersbord_L8.svg|Nederlands
Image:Spain traffic signal s15a.svg|Spain
Image:Sweden road sign E17-1.svg|Sweden
Image:Dopravná značka IP4.svg|Slovakia
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.172.67.54 (talk) 09:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  not only french traffic sign 

message: I have been a professional transportation and land use planner in the United States for 21 years.  My wife is also a professional land use planner (AICP).  We both hold Master's degrees.  We have NEVER heard any other planner or traffic engineer say "culs-de-sac".  Not one time.  I can't recall seeing it pluralized that way in any academic journals.  The 100s of professional planners I have known use "cul-de-sacs" because in American English it is one word and the plural goes at the end.  However, I am not suprised that the know-it-alls at NPR would pluralize it "culs-de-sac".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.154.54 (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct plural form 2 

message: There appear to be a vast number of citation errors in the article -- perhaps as a result of vandalism.  Can someone fix it?  --MicahBrwn (talk) 07:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite errors 

message: Why is there a misspell in the last paragraph of "eead end" ? am I missing something? Georgegh (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Because I missed the "d" key and hit the "e" key, which is right above it on my keyboard.   But it's fixed now.  Thanks.Ccrrccrr (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "eead end" misspell ? 

message: I live in Australia and I have [b]never[/b] heard anyone call a Cul-de-sac a 'court', only, 'dead end', 'no-through-road' and 'cul-de-sac'. I realise these these streets can be called 'courts', for example Tenth Street could be called Tenth Court, but I've never heard anyone actually call a cul-de-sac a court, and both the houses I've ever lived in have been on cul-de-sacs.
JWPJ (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. KiddieTechie KiddieTalk 11:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that Aust street signage says 'No Through Road' and that 'No Through Road' and 'Dead End' are both used colloquially. 'Cul de sac' is also used colloquially, but less often. 'Court' and 'Close' are also occasionally used colloquially, but more for residenial streets with the bulbous end.  Format (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Somehow this has stuck back in, a road is never referred to as a court in Australia. Though a Cul-de-sac might be named as one, it might also be named with any other street suffix aswell (Foobar Court could also be Foobar Place, Foobar Lane, etc.). The other three terms enjoy various levels of usage (generally they actually refer to different parts/kinds of no through road). -- Nbound (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: When I saw the topmost image, the only word that came to mind was Place.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.96.124.10 (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian English? 

message: It is interesting to see different street signs, here. I remember getting lost in a cul de sac in Dublin, years ago, 
as I didn't know French (and was used to the German traffic sign that resambles the Belgian one).
But for further namings (Chinese etc.), I regard the selection of languages as arbitrary - this is rather a topic for the wikionary, I think.
You could just point to the corresponding lemmata in these languages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.49.167.81 (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Terminology 

message: Why does this article bear a French name when it's DEFINITELY not the most common name for what it describes? I'd say applying this is in order. --uKER (talk) 02:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, one week and no replies. Anyway, I don't care about this article to do the change myself, but I find it ridiculous that this article bears such a convoluted name as "cul-de-sac" and not simply "dead end" or some other more common term. --uKER (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Because Wikipedia likes to make weird choice, not like a logical encyclopaedia. I can see no other answers. It happens very often. Here, it's not a forum, and people replies years later...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:24A1:2C94:7C95:2742 (talk) 14:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  French article name? 

message: Currently the lead states:
thumb|British no through road sign.
I think this lead is inaccurate for several reasons. Although the OED sates "Etymology:  French = sack-bottom, bag-bottom." with a meaning of  "A street, lane, or passage closed at one end, a blind alley; a place having no outlet except by the entrance;", I think that is a better description for which the "no through road" sign is used. A "no through road" (or "dead end") in British English is not usually a synonym for cul-de-sac. A "no through road" is any road that does not have another exit for motorised vehicles from the "no through road" located. For example a road may end and a footpath continue, that is a dead end for road traffic, or it may end because it simply has no other exit (eg because it leads to a carpark, or a beach, or has been block to stop commuter rat runs etc, etc). Most British people would describe these types of roads as "dead ends" They reserve cud-de-sac a short no through road with houses on both sides and the end with their frontages onto the no through road. It will of course have a "no through road sigh" but that is a function of the road layout not a description of what a "cul de sac" is. -- PBS (talk) 11:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it's a catalan expression, written without "tags" (is called tag?): cul de sac. The french borrowed the expression from catalan, and it seems that from french passed to english. The problem is that is written exactly the same way in catalan and in french. There is another expression also, coming to catalan to french: "cap-i-cua", from catalan "cap i cua". In that case, "cap i cua" literally means "head and queue", that refers to a word or numer that can be read in the 2 directions (for example, 16361). This expression is used in french, but the difference is that in french its words doesn't make any sense if we read literally, unlike in catalan.37.135.116.173 (talk) 10:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Cul-de-sac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080216033215/http://mla.stanford.edu/Politics_&_English_language.pdf to http://mla.stanford.edu/Politics_&_English_language.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091016111356/http://www.george-orwell.org/Politics_and_the_English_Language/0.html to http://www.george-orwell.org/Politics_and_the_English_Language/0.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I realize that many people do indeed use the terms interchangeably, but the article should also point out that many people believe there is a distinction. Specifically, a cul-de-sac is a type of dead end where the end has a "bulb" shape to facilitate turning around. It may be regional, but where I live, most people wouldn't consider a dead end without a bulb a cul-de-sac. Does that make sense? All cul-de-sacs are dead ends, but not all dead ends are cul-de-sacs?
If you're looking for source consider definition 2 on wikitionaryhttps://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cul-de-sac and this pagehttp://www.thetruthaboutrealty.com/cul-de-sac-vs-dead-end-street-from-a-real-estate-perspective/.Jon uw (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cul-de-sac and Dead End aren't interchangeable

message: It's not pronounced the French way, or a way approaching, like many borrowed words?
French pronunciation is "kydsak". I'm surprised English language pronounce the "l".—Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a01:e35:8a8d:fe80:24a1:2c94:7c95:2742 (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cul-de-sac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130407043850/http://www.rsa-95.de/VZ-Liste.htm to http://www.rsa-95.de/VZ-Liste.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://mla.stanford.edu/Politics_%26_English_language.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100715144246/http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm to http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dead end (street). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111110141027/http://www.library.cornell.edu/Reps/DOCS/eberstad.htm to http://www.library.cornell.edu/Reps/DOCS/eberstad.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I undid the edit on 21:05, April 12, 2018‎ by B137 since the image added did not really relate to the article on the topic of a 'dead end street'. According to the caption it was provided to demonstrate an example of a humorously worded road sign, which really doesn't belong here. If someone disagrees with this please feel free to reply.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 06:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I couldn't think of where to place it, if anywhere, and that it was a stretch. There's a place for it in Wikipedia, it's just gotta lay around. B137 (talk) 06:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for undoing edit on "21:05, April 12, 2018". 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved first to Dead end street, second not moved. The majority of commenters seemed to prefer Dead end street over Dead end so I moved the first one there. Leaving the second page as is had universal consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 18:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose as it's commonly used for other purposes like dead end job or genetic dead end.  Killuminator (talk) 11:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Killuminator Just to check I have read your suggestion correctly, I take it your position is Move Dead end (street) but to Dead end street. I suggested this as a form of natural disambiguation in Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests but I did not think it would be controversial. I am not sure if you are familiar with suggesting a move different to the one proposed but I have successfully done this before e.g. in Talk:River Dyfi#Requested move 28 July 2019 which resulted in the article being moved to River Dyfi instead of the proposed Afon Dyfi from River Dovey. Tk420 (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with Dead end street, I undersigned a proposal like that down below when @Zxcvbnm made it.  Killuminator (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this is not fine. Do not move to dead end street.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 November 2023