Talk:Australian two-dollar coin

message: The minting figures section has listed the numbers of $2 coins minted for each year. But comparison with the RAM official numbers are completely different wrong for 2011 and 2010. What is going on?
http://www.ramint.gov.au/designs/ram-designs/2dollars.cfm
Yendor of yinn (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Where are the numbers minted figures from?

message: :Image:Australian Two Dollar Obv.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Australian Two Dollar Obv.jpg

message: :Image:Australian Two Dollar Rev.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Australian Two Dollar Rev.jpg

message: I heard there was some concern with the fact that on all the other coins are Australian animals http://www.mundanebehavior.org/issues/v2n3/awofeso-green.htm phocks (talk) 06:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous Australian Identity 

message: It says on the page that "The only years that had no production was 1991... ...and 2012" however I have, in front of me now, a 2012 $2 coin... I am reading it wrong or is the page wrong?
The coin is a standard 'Aboriginal Elder' design on the back and is marked as 2012.
Just what I have seen... :)
(Despite removing this, I double-checked closer-up and it definitely *is* 2012!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyosamo (talk • contribs) 08:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 2012 Production? 

message: We currently say:
"The Australian two dollar coin is the highest-denomination coin of the Australian dollar."
Would probably be more accurate to say:
"The Australian two dollar coin is the highest-denomination regular coin of the Australian dollar."
There are Australian coins with a face value up to $1,000,000. They are legal tender, though you wouldn't - the value of the metal in them exceeds the face value.
e.g. https://www.kidsnews.com.au/money/australias-milliondollar-gold-coin-has-a-big-day-out-in-new-york/news-story/24f7c2711719609e29ce257b39c5595d
Cheers, Ben Aveling 12:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  highest-denomination _regular_ coin 

message: I just added the commemorative coins for the "2020" Olympics and Paralympics to the list under the 2020 section (and clean up some messed up coding from someone's previous additions). I did that because that is the year that is actually inscribed on the coins, however due to the delay of the games the coins were actually released in 2021. I'm not sure which would be the correct way to present them - by year inscribed or by release year, but felt the inscribed year would be correct. So I don't know if they need to be changed, but perhaps a footnote should be included to note the release date differs from the inscribed date? 2001:8003:2D90:C400:B591:1789:A12D:4D64 (talk) 13:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics