lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Capital punishment in Saudi Arabia

message: The current link for 'piracy' appears to point to copyright infringement. I suspect this is the wrong meaning of the word, so have changed it accordingly.
fatbarry2000 (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piracy 

message: I think it would be appropriate to add another section to the article summarizing the response of other states to capital punishment carried out in Saudi Arabia. Certainly, there are many other nations, but the largest and most economically powerful could be listed first. James Kennicott (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response from other states 

message: In the 1980s the law had been if the swordsman failed to cut off on the head on the third try, the condemned was freed. Is that still done? USN1977 (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed execution?
Talk:Gingerbread (charity)

message: According to an article in today's Times (24 April 2017) the Conservative politician Neville Chamberlain (later Prime Minister) was a Vice-President of the National Council for the Unmarried Mother and her Child in the 1920s, and in 1926 sponsored legislation to amend the illegitimacy laws.  If this is correct, it seems noteworthy, and Chamberlain might be mentioned among the 'people associated with the charity'.109.149.91.161 (talk) 12:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If citeable information can be found it would be a welcome addition to this article as well as to his (which presently does not mention the illegitimacy laws).Cloptonson (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neville Chamberlain
Talk:Kaiser Jeep M715

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Ok.  Obvious I'm biased towards the Dana 60.  I'm not going to hide that.  But this truck is the starting line for the Dana 60 front axle.  The Dana 60 front axle being the flag ship of all front axles.   As well as a means of gauging strengths on other axles.  You often here people refer to front axles are as equal or less than the Dana 60. I am going to be piecing something together.  A section tuned to "Significant attributes" or something like that.  --Dana60Cummins (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The start of the Dana 60.
Talk:Princess Louisa Inlet

message: The comments in the article about how the inlet may have been named, but since both of those who are candidates had "Louise" rather than "Louisa" in their names, I wonder whether it may have been named for Victoria, Princess Royal(Victoria Adelaide Mary Louisa).  The mountains around were named for her siblings. --KenWalker | Talk 05:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Inlet 
Talk:Cameroon People's Democratic Movement

message: What are the political positions of this party? AxelBoldt (talk) 16:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Possible image here.  HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 05:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Ozonide

message: Sodium Ozonide (NaO3) can't decompose to Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) as Sodium Ozonide doesn't have any hydrogen atoms in it. 209.27.50.162 (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sodium Ozonide can't decompose to Sodium Hydroxide 

message: IUPAC says ozonides are 1,2,4-trioxolanes but our article says: "Organic ozonides are called molozonides".?  Christian75 (talk) 18:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Organic ozonides
Talk:List of mayors of Harvard, Illinois

message: The article Mayor of Rock Island, Illinois has a nice introductory history of how that office developed over time, before presenting it's list of mayors. This would be a good thing to put together for this article. Cosmo1976 (talk) 01:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Note For Future Improvement

message: I just discovered the possibility that another mayor may exist for the City of Harvard.  A man named P. E. Saunders may have served as the mayor between Nathan B. Helm and M.W, Lake. This information comes from:
History of Chemung, Il.
From: The History of McHenry County, Illinois
Published by: Munsell Publishing Company, 1922
His inclusion in the list will wait until the dates of his service are found.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmo1976 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Mayor ?
Talk:Masked crimson tanager

message: Please help in adding additional information about this species.  Specifically, more information on human interaction, taxonomy, etc. would be greatly appreciatedTKYung (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick info
Talk:William B. Black (Illinois politician)

message: This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending changes
Talk:Twink Caplan

message: :In 2007 [Caplan] produced the romantic comedy I Could Never Be Your Woman, also appearing in the film as Michelle Pfeiffer's costume designer, Sissy. It marked her 20-year acting reunion with Pfeiffer, who played her best friend in Falling in Love Again.
As far as I've been able to determine, Falling in Love Again was actually released in 1980—so wouldn't that be a 27-year acting reunion? – AndyFielding (talk) 10:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math check?
Talk:United National Movement (Georgia)

message: According to how this party treats the national minorities, it seems that the UNM is a far right political party.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.194.119 (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a far right political party 

message: this flag is not party flag, it is flag of a country, flag of georgia. unm has no flag. they were using this flag before 2004. after rose revolution this flag became state flag. party and country can not have same flag. therefore i have removed this flag from article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.221.252.247 (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is flag of georgia 

message: The infobox states that this party is dissolved and I recently made several changes to this article reflect that. These changes have since been reversed but the infobox still states that the party is dissolved. I was under the impression that the UNM split into the Movement for Liberty - European Georgia and the National Movement. Does anyone know what's going on here? Charles Essie (talk) 16:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Dissolved?

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the "National Movement" is the same party. Charles Essie (talk) 22:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Apart from a general need of sources, parts of this article such as #2004–2007: Centralization, reforms, strong executive cover the general achievements of Georgian government, broadly construed (president + parliament) without saying in what way this relates to the UNM. With all the party name changes (from National Movement to/from United National Movement?) and various short-term or long-term coalitions, this has to be clarified for ordinary readers who are not going to be able to remember all the various details of the full article. 
I've currently marked this section with an  tag, which of course can be removed if the relation with UNM is properly clarified. To what degree was Saakashvili representing the UNM or working with the UNM during this period? Currently the #Founding section of the article says that Saakashvili created the NM, not the UNM. Even if Saakashvili created the UNM and the UNM + other parties supported his presidential campaign, that doesn't say in what way the 2004–2007 executive and legislative actions related to UNM. Were ministers acting purely on behalf of the UNM party? Were they consulting various groups in Georgian society more broadly?
Please fix this with proper sourcing if you can help. Boud (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed; relation with UNM needed
Talk:SYBR Green I

message: Correct capitilization is SyBR Green if I'm not mistaken--ZayZayEM 06:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was surprised when I read this paper that the abstract seems not to particularly represent the data shown. I have access to the paper and would be happy to send it to you if you email me. Celefin (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Ok. I agree with you!  My friend found the paper so we will read it and see what it concludes.  Thanks for your reply, and I am reading the paper because I am interested in practical considerations of handling the SYBR green. J1MATHMAN (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

message: There is a slight disagreement between the sigma-aldrich data sheet on SYBR Green I http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/etc/medialib/docs/Sigma-Aldrich/Datasheet/s9430dat.Par.0001.File.tmp/s9430dat.pdf
and this article.  For example, here it says peak excitation is 488, there it says it is 497.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.212.40 (talk) 19:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  disagreement with sigma-aldrich datasheet 

message: Would be nice to add when SYBR Green I became popular (e. g. first time use should be noted down) and which prior dyes it replaced. 
(Never mind: the second part is answered via the reference to "ethidium bromide", first part is still missing though.) 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 09:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic facts 

message: I understand that the most popular variant (or at the least at some point in time) was SYBR Green I. But why the number "I" there? Obviously if there is I aka 1 then there must be more than one I guess. The article mentions this here: "The SYBR family of dyes is produced by Molecular Probes Inc., now owned by Thermo Fisher Scientific." So, a family of dyes. But where can we read up on this? What family? When? Where?
I should explain that a bit. Say that an exam question is as simple as "which dye is commonly used in a real-time PCR?". So, people may answer "SYBR Green" or "SYBR Green I". I assume both answers MAY be correct, but I would also assume that the answer "SYBR Green I" is a bit more specific. What if someone answers "SYBR Green II"? Is this wrong? Perhaps it is wrong, but where to look this up? It would be nice if wikipedia could add some more information in this regard, either in the article here, or in a more general one, e. g. fluorescent dyes, and data where/when/how these were used. Right now I don't know how many SYBR Green variants are in used. Could be 1, 2 or 500 ... 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 10:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  SYBR Green I versus SYBR Green family
Talk:North Oxfordshire Academy

message: In my opinion the articles should not be merged. Although North Oxfordshire Academy (NOA) will be on the same site as Drayton School, it will be a completely different school. It will be funded by, and accountable to, a different authority (ULT as opposed to Oxfordshire), will have different governors, a different principal, a different curriculum etc etc.
When NOA opens its article is likely to expand.
Drayton School has been an important part of the life of Banbury between 1973 and 2007 and therefore should retain its separate article.
I do agree with you there. Drayton School should have a separate article even though many Drayton staff are now moving to North Oxfordshire Academy. Manm hk 08:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Proposal to merge article with Drayton School article
Template talk:Canon EF lenses

message: Rather than truckloads of articles on canon lenses, would not a couple of detailed lists be enough? (for example one list for macro lenses, one for ultra wide angle, wide angle, normal etc etc). 130.232.144.221 06:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would tend to concur. There isn't that much you can say about a lense that you couldn't in a list article. There is already a list on EF Mount. It's possible some lenses might be worth comment (i.e. 1200 mm f/5.6, 50 mm f/1.0) - but I think outside of that it's just going to be elements and groups. Megapixie 07:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't think so... I like how every class of lens has it's own article. Some of them have enough history to warrant an article by themselves imho. — Guillaume Pelletier ~ 00:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Canon lens galore

message: All lenses distort the image, just in different ways.  For instance, a "standard" rectilinear lens preserves straight lines but can only achieve that by distorting circles, while a fisheye lens preserves circles but must distort straight lines to do so.  This category is poorly named and fisheye lenses should be in a category of their own.  Some manufacturers have produced multiple soft focus/defocus lenses so I don't see why this can't also be a separate category.  121.45.203.191 (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add that tilt/shift lenses could equally be called "distorting".  121.45.203.191 (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Distorting Lenses" 

message: Hi,
I have add the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens. Basically I have put it to EF-M primes and Macro lens. Is this a good idea, or should it only in one category? And if only in one, main question: in which one? --GodeNehler (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which category  for the new Canon EF-M 28mm Macro lens? 

message: Question: Should we put the new Canon RF Lenses, or should we create a new Template? --GodeNehler (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Canon RF Lenses
Talk:Richibucto

message: *This is not an article, it's an advertisement. It should be deleted. Connell66 06:35, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the advertising.  If you still feel it should be deleted, take it to WP:AFD.  BTW, next time, please put the template on the article, not the Talk Page. --Richard 06:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: move. 
Rename: Richibucto, New Brunswick → Richibucto
Per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE, this town should have an article at the undisambiguated name (see also WP:CANCITY). An internet search which excludes Wikipedia mirrors and "New Brunswick" still produces results exclusively related to it. Mindmatrix 15:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename page
Talk:AirUK

message: The question whether KLM uk should be merged into AirUK is dicussed here.--FoxyOrange (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like it was put into archives too soon so this 3 year old discussion is not concluded.  It should be restarted here.
*No, it should be the other way round as KLM uk was the last surviving airline. In other cases, American Airways became American Airlines and the Wikipedia article is American Airlines.  Therefore, I start the modified proposal, Air UK merged into KLM uk - Yes, merge this way. Usernamen1 (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Template talk:Ice hockey halls of fame

message: I suggest to create another category of "league" affiliated Hockey Hall of Fame's in addition to the "international" and "national" categories.  The traditional NHL sponsored Hockey Hall of Fame should be put into the new "league" affiliated category not in the "international" category.  There is also a need to create a page for the AHL Hockey Hall of Fame , which should also go into the "league" affiliated category
:Are there really that many league-affiliated halls? The HHOF is starting to induct non-NHL members (Valery Kharlamov), so that complicates the definition a bit.
:The HHOF has dozens of Honoured Members who never played in the NHL.  There's no need for more category splitting.    Ravenswing  15:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Suhail (disambiguation)

message: Anyone know what 'Muhlif' means? Rothorpe 21:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly by astronomers, but I take your point and will remove the sentence, as it is covered later on - Rothorpe (talk) 18:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: al-muhlif means the oath-swearer.  Not that I know any Arabic, but there are fairly reliable references for this.  I'm taking out the sentence that says Suhail means brightest star.  It appears to mean nothing of the sort, although it does now have connotations such as glorious.  If anything, Suhail originally appears to derive from meaning level or even, perhaps applying to the several bright stars that get this name.  Although Canopus wouldn't seem to fit that description.  Either way, it doesn't seem good to me to state this without some form of reference and I can't find any. Lithopsian (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

message: Should this be a disambiguation page rather than an article?  I wouldn't think the content actually has to change, mostly just adding a few tags. Lithopsian (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page
Talk:Joe Craft

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.utulsa.edu/academics/colleges/collins-college-of-business/About-the-College/Business-Hall-of-Fame/Joseph-W-Craft-III.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Henry Marlowe Middle School

message: We ask all people who edit this article not to add spam!!!!--Mgeheren 02:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

message: A new rating of the article was asked for, but I will not raise it to "B". This is no where near to what a B rating would be, and nothing is cited. So, I will keep the rating as "Start". See other schools that have a rating of "B" or "GA" to get an idea of how to do a school article. This one sorely needs help.--Kranar drogin 03:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: This school does not have any notability, nor does it assert any. Rather than just merge it myself (and subsequently probably get it undone), I would like to discuss whether or not it meets the general notability guideline. I support the idea of merging into the respective school district, Consolidated School District 158. talkingbirds 23:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Mitchigamea

message: I have undone a number of recent edits on this article regarding which language family Michigamea belonged to. The edits wrote that Michigamea was an Algonquian language, which disagrees with the (as far as I know) only significant published evidence regarding the language, that being an analysis of an 18th century Michigamea fragment and its identification by a Siouan language expert as belonging to the Mississippi Valley division of the Siouan language family. The previous claims in this article identifying Michigamae as an Algonquian language were unsourced, except for a vague reference to 20th century oral tradition (over which contemporary 18th-century documentation takes precedent); it also included some editorializing about the trustworthiness of modern researchers and their "motives" which is inappropriate for an encyclopedic reference work such as Wikipedia.
I concede that not a lot is known about the Michigamea and that the evidence for their being Siouan is not air-tight. However, unless somebody can find some recent and reliable works of scholarship (which are not original research) to the contrary, then the article should be in accordance with the most recent scholarship and the majority opinion of experts in the field. CMurdock (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language family
Talk:Caret (disambiguation)

message: I'm not too sure about the section on the secret government organisation. The IP who first added it openly claimed it was a 'stupid thing on the net' (I can't remember the exact words used, but along those lines), so it probably isn't that notable. Another IP expanded on this information, but I'm still not sure about the notability. Alternatively, it could just be a hoax. Either way, it's a no win situation. I've commented out the bullet point for the time being, but it needs discussing. CarrotMan 07:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Forgive me if I am going about this the wrong way.  I am not new to reading wikipedia but I have never, until now, had something to say or a desire to edit/add something.  The Isaac/CARET phenomenon, that's all I can think of to call it, is comprised of many different elements and I don't know if the existing 'black project' listing on the Caret disambiguation page is either fair or accurate.  It may be many things and I think it deserves a section somewhere on this site but I wouldn't know where to start.  For example, there are many conspiracy and ufo, fringe sites if you prefer, where threads concerning this subject have generated hundreds of pages.  For the most part, these discussions have been logical and sincere which is why I think this Caret issue might have a place here.  Unfortunately, like I stated earlier, I have no idea how to create an article that could cover this issue fairly and, within the context of the subject, factually.  By factually I mean presenting the photographs, documents and text in an unbiased manner without forcing my own opinions or spin on it.  I dunno, I'll go have a look at the John Titor article and perhaps that will give me a starting point.  I appreciate any help in the meantime from anyone interested.
Thanks,
Matthew
IAMONE 01:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CARET entry 

message: The Isaac and CARET story may indeed be a hoax. Yet it may still prove to be an interesting and notable article, however the account may be of fiction. A very good example of that, I believe, is the John Titor page. Therefore I think we should have a C.A.R.E.T. entry. I may start the article in the coming days.
Thanks,
Anonymous Coward  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.233.180.82 (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support for the CARET entry 

message: I have added an external link to the CARET "conspiracy theory" or whatever you want to call it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apemannen (talk • contribs) 20:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Conspiracy" hyperlink added