Talk:Immunoglobulin G

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: What is this? Why is it here? This kind of analysis seems to be solely a project of Chou and I haven't seen the application of this technique spread much further than citations by this author. Does this need to be on the main page for IgG? It seems to be confusing things - if it's true or not, it doesn't appear to be very relevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.65.131.154 (talk) 08:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low-frequency internal motion 

message: Should be included
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1104650
Wawot1 (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEJM Review on IgG4 related disease 

message: I just made this edit contributing content from a public health campaign about overuse of medical resources. In this campaign, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology was asked to make some suggestions about some diagnostic tests which are commonly used but for which there is no evidence indicating that the diagnostic results in better outcomes. One of the items they proposed is an end to IgG testing as a diagnostic for allergies, and I cited that and a review article saying the same thing. I posted that information here, but I was wondering if that indicates that IgG measurement is a diagnostic for something else or the source of the idea that measurement of IgG can diagnose something came from somewhere.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A great section; surprised there isn't more on it here already. Makes me wonder if this topic is addressed somewhere else - maybe something a moderator of these pages could help with. In response to your question, IgG is commonly used to diagnose immunity to pathogens, usually viral ones. I added to this section based on information from the Quest Diagnostics 2012 Directory of Services Manual. Couldn't find a copy to properly cite it, though.--157.139.50.92 (talk) 19:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - here is what you did. I just referenced your statement to that publication - if anyone can develop the citation to make it proper then that would be helpful.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Hay 14.244.49.225 (talk) 23:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Use as diagnostic

message: In the subclasses section, the table seems to contradict the text.
Text speaks of IgG3 being low-affinity and IgG1 & IgG2 being high affinity whereas the table says that IgG2 is low affinity.
I'm not sure what the right answer is myself, but I don't think it can be both.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:9D80:F7:BD95:2ADD:397A:8F14 (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subclasses - mistake ? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Immunoglobulin G. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121103151124/http://choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/5things_12_factsheet_AAAAI.pdf to http://choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/5things_12_factsheet_AAAAI.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified