lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stercobilin

message: Are urobilin and stercobilin the same compound?--Miguelferig (talk) 19:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are different compounds. They have different molar masses and different chemical formulas as well (stercobilin has 4 additional hydrogen atoms). However, they are related and are similar. Rytyho usa (talk) 04:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity
Talk:Battle of Great Bridge

message: Who is Woodard and Fordyce?? --AW 19:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Why does the summary table say 409 for the British when according to the text only 180 were engaged in the battle?
Winterbadger (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strengths 

message: The summary on the right hand side does not actually display the British & Loyalist casualty figures, even though they show up when editing. I am not sure what is causing this glitch. DavisGL (talk) 02:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with display
Talk:Hologic

message: It seems a bit weird this is the first sentence of the history section rather than something about when the company was founded:
"In late November 2013, activist investor Carl Icahn disclosed a 12.5% stake in the company."
82.147.226.240 (talk) 14:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I reverted a number of edits to this page that were subjectively negative. Sounded like an analyst that wants to paint a nasty picture of Hologic. Let's keep things objective. ask123 19:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: Parts of this sound like a press release.  Please avoid vague terms like "state of the art" and "leading developer".  That doesn't communicate concrete information to the reader.  It would be better to say "One of the three largest companies in mammography" (or whatever the actual facts are).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacocking
Talk:Shecky's

message: Shecky's is an established and well-known company. This article is a summary of who they are and what they do. It has been edited to remove what may be regarded as blatant advertising, and the remaining content, I believe, should meet Wikipedia requirements. Please reference other similar pages for Zagat and HipGuide in considering the validity of this entry.
:I don't consider the current version a speedy delete candidate as spam, but it doesn't make a case for notability under our guidelines and lacks verifiable 3rd party sources.  These issues should be addressed with article edits.--Isotope23 19:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2007 topic 
Talk:Atmos (character)

message: There seems to be a tendency to use the word "champion" instead of what seems to be the word "leader" that would better describe what is someone. We generally do not say that "X" Warlord was the champion of "X" Battle. We say they are the leader of "X" people or country.2605:E000:9149:8300:131:6246:D91E:742A (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using "Champion" when the word may be leader
Talk:Traffic Violations Bureau

message: Honestly, I think this is a bit one-sided.  I imagine it's probably very much like what the article says, but the authors here are drawing their own conclusions, such as how not allowing discovery "is the equivilent to denying a motorist a decent chance at adequately defending him/herself".  This is original research at best, or at worst the author's opinion stated as fact.  Thoughts?
*Sorry, this was me.  My browser likes to forget login cookies it seems. Spoom - Talk 19:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Ashure

message: = something like Ashure! You can see from this site a Modern Panspermia: http://www.organicallycooked.com/2009/03/panspermia-pallikaria.html  Böri (talk) 10:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Greek Panspermia (dessert) 

message: Is there a source for this? 213.172.101.198 (talk) 09:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of Armenian Origin? 

message: ″Ashure stands unique among other Turkish desserts as it contains no animal products.″
Kalburabastı? Kabak Tatlısı? Ayva Tatlısı? Şekerpare? Lokma? Will remove the 'unique' emphasis of this statement if no one has an objection.Eleman (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegan 

message: Hi all, what is this strange english spelling here? Wouldn't it be better to use the proper (turkish) spelling (aşure) and transliterate to english? Greetings! --Wienerschmäh (talk) 16:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aşure vs. Ashure
Talk:Evil twin (wireless networks)

message: Article mentions VPN as protection, but fails to mention the obvious: HTTPS.  Passwords go through HTTPS and not HTTP, and hence are invisible to crackers (hackers).  Some sites are lazy or cheap enough not to use HTTPS, but users should be aware of that issue by now.--John Bessa (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: HTTPS

message: There is repetition in the first few introductory sentences and under the Method heading. A more condense introductory paragraph would read much better. GR8DAN (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition

message: Are there any other countermeasures besides HTTPS and VPN? 129.247.247.240 (talk) 08:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Countermeasures
Talk:Endangerment

message: The Public endangerment article does not present sufficient information to stand on its own. It should be merged here. Neelix (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Public endangerment]]

message: The caption reads, "The United States Postal Inspection Service has a long, proud, and successful history of fighting criminals who attack the nation's postal system and misuse it to defraud, endanger, or otherwise threaten the American public." The phrasing here is unencyclopedic, especially the word "proud" which seems to be an opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.109.1.240 (talk) 00:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Caption on picture is not from a neutral point of view

message: reckless in dangerment 2600:1006:B167:D191:49BF:3625:29FD:70D5 (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  court
Talk:List of renewable energy topics by country and territory

message: Question is should solar thermal be lumped in with PV.  I'd argue they are different enough to merit separate items--Oldboltonian 19:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why wasn't this just "Energy topics by country"?  Isn't that a lot more direct and appropriate?  The only reason people aren't asking those questions is because there's this huge renewable club going around Wikipedia.  Selectively creating articles isn't an issue, but I think organizing them as such is an issue.
That said, I do think i've only seen one fossil fuel by country article, which I just made: Coal power in the United States, which further perplexes me as to why this article is specifically about renewables.  I don't even want to get into the fact that all the topics covered here (excluding nuclear) cover about 2% of the world's electricity production.  And just in case you want a source for that, this is the world's electricity production breakdown for 2005:
Hydro	16.71%
Nuclear	15.13%
Renewables	2.13%
Thermal	66.02%
And another thing, why haven't I seen more "Energy in xx" articles?  Do we not care?  Shouldn't these be stressed fairly highly even if no one's doing work on them?  For instance, there's an Energy in Japan article.  I also see an Energy in Iran, and then every other country is over complicated with titles like Energy use in the United States (why do we have to be inconsistent now).
Anyway, this is the sort of thing that's been bothering me. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 17:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nuclear clearly doesn't fit in here, so have replaced the nuclear column with Hydro.  Hope this helps... Johnfos 20:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still, my question is this:  why is this about renewable energy topics?  Where is the list of energy topics by country? -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 01:04, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this what you want? Cattus talk 04:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, getting closer.  yes.  thank you. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 04:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My problems with this list

message: Ethanol fuel is being changed into the more general biofuel - biodesiel is much more important than ethanol. 199.125.109.80 (talk) 18:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Biofuel
Talk:Economy of Colorado

message: The list of energy companies seems rather out of date- Western Gas was rolled into Anadarko Petroleum in 2006, along with Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain, making Anadarko one of the largest players in town. EOG Resources, WPX (formerly Williams Petroleum), QEP Resources, Encana, and Whiting Petroleum are some of the major energy companies in Denver now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.16.209.61 (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Energy Companies 
Talk:The Void (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: I do not understand the 'Notes' section. What does this episode have to do with reality television?
And even if the episode was about it, the section seems inappropiate i.e. speculation. There's always going to be criticism of any television episode, do we need to note it all?
Lots42 19:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it, I agree with you. Matthew 19:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reality What Now? 

message: The plot could do with trimming. The problem is, though I have seen this episode, I do not understand it and thus I couldn't trim it 'just right'. The only thing I really got out of it is the increased replicator capibillity because I am that kind of nerd. Lots42 (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming 

message: I guess it depends on your definition of trimming, my understanding of the episode was a final re-affirmation of the Voyager crew maintaining their morals and humanity despite six/seven years cut off from the Federation (especially in the case of Marquis crew members).
The plot could be written as:
"Voyager is pulled into an anomaly, has to fight for survival,Janeway refuses, Voyager escapes with help from other ships also caught in the anomaly."
Not very exciting...
I do agree that the article could be more descriptive, as it currently reads as a synopsis of the episode aand nothing more. Maaybe i'll watch it again soon and try and fix it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The evil jelly (talk • contribs) 00:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re:Trimming
Talk:The Adventures of Mary-Kate & Ashley

message: I've re-written the article and replaced the redirect. It could still use quite a bit of work, but at least it's no longer a one sentence description with one section that was purely for promotional purposes. I've also tacked on a few wikiproject banners to hopefully catch the attention of other editors. --132 19:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write

message: I just want to point out that their motto is "Will solve any crime by dinnertime", not "We'll solve any crime by dinnertime." It is on the front of every video case, and I edited it a few times...but someone keeps changing it back. I don't have a reference (I can't use a video case as a reference), so I hope it will stay this time...Olsentwinluv4ever (talk) 01:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Motto

message: Was this ever a TV series / televised?  It appears that it was simply just a series of direct-to-video releases with no TV connection, but that's just the movie side.  I'm just trying to get the right infobox & tags on it, but can't find any TV links!   SkierRMH 23:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was both. The individual half-hour episodes were all released straight to video. However, the Sea World one (the full length movie) was a made-for-tv movie that later got released on VHS. I hope that might have cleared things up at least a little. --74.137.225.219 13:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To elaborate, ABC aired both the Case of the Sea World Adventure and the Case of the Mystery Cruise as one TV movie called Mystery on the High Seas which was aired on a Saturday morning (Mary-Kate and Ashley promoted it when they hosted ABC's TGIF lineup the previous night). If memory serves me, they changed some of the title cards for that special. The Mystery series (as well as the You're Invited series) also aired on ABC Family for a short time as weekday morning kids' programming. 68.82.197.7 (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: TV or FILM?

message: Seeing as this show was a musical and each episode had it's own songs, it would make sense to me to list the songs with the corresponding episode. Does this seem like something that would help improve the page to others? I figure they could go possibly go in the plot outline area or have a chart depicting the song and which episode it belongs to. Spirallingflowers (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song List
Talk:Mabe, Cornwall

message: If anyone is feeling bored the following guidelines should be applied to this page:
#References are placed after punctuation (i.e., full-stops)
#Size should not be specified for images (apart from the main image) to allow for user preference
#Links should appear in a External links section
# has largely been replaced by 
#The gallery is depreciated, it should be replaced with a relevant Commons link (e.g. )
#The prose should flow, rather than one sentence paragraphs
Cheers, Jack (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Two different dates are given for the founding of the choir: please amend if you have accurate information.----Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ladies' Choir 
Talk:SacAnime

message: The forum link is not allowed by Wikipedia's linking guidelines at WP:EL. And given that the link is present on the convention's webpage, which is already linked, it is also completely unnecessary. Also, none of the other anime convention articles have links to forums either. and if one did slip by, it should be removed as well. --Farix (Talk) 11:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the fanimecon link, it has a link to their forums as well..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohshimasu (talk • contribs) 17:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said in a previous edit summery, even if there was another anime convention article with a forum link, it should also be removed. It does not, however, constitute an reason to ignore a well establish guideline for this article (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). --Farix (Talk) 20:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forum link 
Talk:Liouville dynamical system

message: *I'm not sure if the solution is formulated clearly. First of all, where does m and a come from in
:
\frac{ma^{2}}{2} \left( \cosh^{2} \xi - \cos^{2} \eta \right)^{2} \dot{\xi}^{2} = E \cosh^{2} \xi + \left( \frac{\mu_{1} + \mu_{2}}{a} \right) \cosh \xi - \gamma
:
\frac{ma^{2}}{2} \left( \cosh^{2} \xi - \cos^{2} \eta \right)^{2} \dot{\eta}^{2} = -E \cos^{2} \eta + \left( \frac{\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}}{a} \right) \cos \eta + \gamma
Y was defined without them, so how can they appear in equations above?
Also I can't see the solution in:
:
u = \int \frac{d\xi}{\sqrt{E \cosh^{2} \xi + \left( \frac{\mu_{1} + \mu_{2}}{a} \right) \cosh \xi - \gamma}} = 
\int \frac{d\eta}{\sqrt{-E \cos^{2} \eta + \left( \frac{\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}}{a} \right) \cos \eta + \gamma}}.
What happened to Y which should be on the left side along with :\sqrt{2}? Was it replaced with u by some change of variables? If that's the case then u depends on xi and eta thus xi and eta cannot be expressed in terms of u. I could really use contents of this article in my work, so I hope that these uncertainties could be solved:) Regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 21:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Appell's equation of motion

message: Is this the system generally known as the Gibbs-Appell equations? Which nomenclature is better known? I have previously
only heard of "The Gibbs-Appell Equations" but I was educated in England, and perhaps Gibbs gets left off in 
non-English-speaking countries. 130.225.25.207 (talk) 12:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: More examples showing how to solve problems using the Gibbs-Appell equation is appreciated. Nerd271 (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:Two-body problem in general relativity

message: In the first paragraph it is written "but an approximate solution has: the Schwarzschild solution."
It is common knowledge that the Schwarzschild solution is one of general relativity's few exact solutions. 2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schwarzschild solution
Talk:Heydon's Case

message: The Article for Heydon's Case outlines how the impact of the case being the creation of the 'mischief rule' for interpreting legislation but does not provide any information about the court case itself.
Who were the parties involved? (The Crown vs. Heydon? Heydon vs. Joe Blogg?)
What was the case about?
What was the result of the trial?
I think this would be basic information this article needs as right now it seems to be nothing more than a bit of background for the mischief rule.
--I (talk) 17:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right now the text is just a splurge lifted from the text of the decision. This is the kind of thing that might suit Wikisource, but it is not an encyclopaedic approach suitable for Wikipedia, especially considering that the text is 500 years old and the language rather archaic and dense and hard for the layman to understand. What it needs is a summary, not plagiarism. Hairy Dude (talk) 02:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No description of the case itself. 

message: This article identifies the court in which Heydon's case was heard as the Exchequer Court, the Court in which the Lord Chancellor sat. But the article on Edward Coke identifies him as having been chief judge of the Court of Common Pleas and another common law court but not Lord Chancellor. Indeed, the Coke article has him returning to Parliament and then retiring to his estate to write after leaving the common law bench.
These two articles can not both be accurate. Which one is mistaken? If Heydon's case was heard in the Exchequer Court then it was not heard by a common law judge. If Coke heard the case then was it in a common law court or is there an appointment to the House of Lords and to the Lord Chancellorship not covered in the article?
— Mposlunq (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of court 

message: As the article stands now, it's a little unclear as to how the mischief rule was applied to the case. What "mischief" was involved in the Act of Dissolution? How did the decision differ from what would have been made if the mischief rule hadn't been applied? It says "The ruling was based on an important discussion of the relationship of a statute to the pre-existing common law.", but doesn't go into any description about the details of that discussion, and how it relates to this particular case. -- 205.175.124.30 (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to mischief rule
Talk:List of newspapers in Colorado

message: I'm the former publisher of Steamboat Springs Review, published 1984-1998; our complete run is on microfilm -- but not online -- at ColoradoHistory.org. Is this enough to be included in the list of defunct CO papers?
EarlPaul (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: some sources as to its existence: http://mountainlion.org/featureaudiokimvacariu.asp, http://www.adopteesearch.info/papers.html . DS (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct paper 
Talk:Faye Wattleton

message: Just a quick comment.  This is a poorly written article in addition to only having 1 source.Lmlmss44 (talk) 04:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: The article relies too much on Wattleton's autobiography and tends to stress her personal perspective. I'm working on it. Goodtablemanners (talk) 16:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary source template
Talk:Downstate Correctional Facility

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation and improvement of articles regarding specific prisons, internment camps, and detention centers here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 02:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 
Talk:List of charities in China

message: I'm sorry to say that it seemed necessary to remove a large amount of content from this well-intentioned article. Per WP:LINKFARM, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of external links; the links should be to internal content rather than a directory of charity websites. I've removed all links that I couldn't immediately see linked to Wikipedia content; a few of these I was able to do myself, but obviously it would be a full day's work to reference these individually. The criteria for list inclusion, it seems to me, should either be inclusion in Wikipedia or, per WP:SAL, "If the company or organization does not have an existing article in Wikipedia, a citation to an independent, reliable source should be provided to establish its membership in the list's group." Please note that if anyone would like to see the previously existing list for reference, it can be found before 5 April 2012 in the article's history. (And if I've erred in my understanding of the above guidelines, reversion is only a few clicks away. =)). Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a directory.... 
Talk:John Smith (Disney)

message: I come with this proposal to create a List of Pocahontas characters and merge in there John Smith and Governor Ratcliffe, and perhaps add sections on minor characters like Thomas, the Chief, Grandmother Willow, Percy, etc. The reason is that none of these characters have managed to prove clear notability outside Pocahontas and related merchandise. Wikipedia:Notability states that characters without such must be merged into lists of characters. --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As there was no opposition and no huge improvement of the articles, both are merged into Pocahontas (1995 film) under the "Cast and characters" section, as there is no point in creating a list with very few non-notable characters. This is in order to avoid reiterating the plot. --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Detox (disambiguation)

message: I believe this page should be deleted or merged, as there is already a disambig page at Detox. Amp 20:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I had a similar case and someone thought it was best to redirect.  How about that?  Hoof Hearted 20:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete or Merge