Talk:XY gonadal dysgenesis

message: A very intresting question came to my mind. If somehow by giving estrogen and other female hormones
will it produce normal baby if it mates with an normal male?
There are no ovaries, hence no eggs, no pregnancy, no baby. alteripse 01:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  if XY female mate with XY male? 

message: Swyer syndrome is one type of gonadal dysgenesis. Rather than confusing mentions of a random assortment of some of the other forms of intersex or gonadal dysgenesis, we need an article on gonadal dysgenesis that explains the term and lists systematically the major forms. In the meantime, I parked some of Ekem's recent additions here because I think they confuse rather than inform the reader. The section either needs to be more complete or systematic (which would be longer than the rest of the article) or it needs to be part of an article on all the forms of gonadal dysgenesis. alteripse 15:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I think we need an article on gonadal dysgenesis

message: I was reciently diagnosed with Swyers, but I noticed that the artice says there shoudn't be any development of secondary sex characteristics(Aka breasts, and pubic hair) however,  I have both.. It it still a form of Swyer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kairnaola (talk • contribs) 15:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagnosed with Swyer, but having secondary sex characteristics 

message: The intro says that breasts develop on their own if the streaks are not removed. The "Treatment" section, on the other hand, suggests that breasts fail to develop without estrogen replacement. Sounds like a contradiction to me... --NetRolller 3D 02:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction regarding breast development 

message: This article seems very short and needs more information.
So I found a bunch of sources that might come in handy, not sure where to put them.
You don’t have to add all of these and there are probably some flaws within these sources I’m merely mentioning them for info.
Found 2 sources mentioning that 10-15% of cases are caused by mutation in SRY gene.
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Clinical_Gynecologic_Endocrinology_and_I/Ll73ZsBKLkwC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Swyer+syndrome&pg=PA365&printsec=frontcover
https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/swyer-syndrome/
The rate of tumor development wasn’t mentioned.
https://fertilitypedia.org/edu/diagnoses/swyer-syndrome
https://wjso.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7819-5-71
The article doesn’t mention that Hormone replacement therapy also helps reduce the risk of reduced bone density and doesn’t mention anything about nerve problems or it having some connections to campomelic dysplasia.
'''
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Genetics_of_Bone_Biology_and_Skeletal_Di/tmx_CwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=swyer+syndrome+osteoporosis&pg=PA6&printsec=frontcover
https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0037/ea0037ep1336
https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/swyer-syndrome/
I think Jeanne Nollman should be mentioned in this article as well since she helped out in intersex activism and was even mentioned on a episode of Mystery Diagnosis.
https://isna.org/node/1082/
http://www.tv.com/shows/mystery-diagnosis/the-woman-with-unusual-dna-1381272/
I found these sources about Gerald Swyer. 
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Dr_Gerald_Swyer/3uwYNQEACAAJ?hl=en
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Fertility_Doctor/WiW1qeQxYM8C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Gerald+Swyer.&pg=PA212&printsec=frontcover
https://history.rcplondon.ac.uk/inspiring-physicians/gerald-isaac-macdonald-swyer
Also the article doesn’t mention anything about menstruation, even tho there have been documented cases like I shown earlier in the talk page.
I also found some more sources that may or may not come in handy.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01703.x
https://www.ecronicon.com/ecgy/pdf/ECGY-08-00329.pdf
https://reference.medscape.com/viewarticle/923606_5
Do as you please with these sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CycoMa (talk • contribs) 06:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  These sources might come in handy 

message: I just realized something [this source] is a primary source.
Sure primary sources are okay at times but a source like that isn’t ideal for article like this.CycoMa (talk) 17:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary source 

message: There is apparent misreading of a science paper that has been included in this article. It resulted in a false statement that reads:
"There has been a case of unassisted pregnancy in one woman with XY gonadal dysgenesis".
The science paper literally contradicts that statement as well.
If you reread the article, the woman who is the topic of said article does not have XY gonadal dysgenesis. If you do a search of the article (usually ctrl F), you will realize that XY gonadal dysgenesis is indeed mentioned. It is not however implied that the subject of the article has it! It also makes reference to her daughter having XY gonadal dysgenesis.
It is citation 4 if you look at the end of the article. Please fact check me (this is the reason I did not just delete the content). I think it was not a vandalization! I think it is a simple misreading. 92.237.107.235 (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error regarding science paper reference/ citation.