lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Motorola i860

message: I know this article is somebody's "baby" e.g. someone put their time and effort in creating this but I have a proposal. I was wondering if it would be ok to rename this article from Nextel i860 and instead rename it to Motorola i860 which would technically be more correct since the i860 also will work on Boost Mobile, etc? For example there's a similar article on the Motorola i930. CaribDigita 20:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jamie Reed

message: I have just removed the following text: "and the mysterious appearance the next day of a light sabre in the space available for MPs to keep their swords in the Members cloakroom." in the bit about JR stating that he was a Jedi. Even if it is true, it is not sourced nor is it appropriate for an encylopedia. Enton 15:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text removed

message: Unfortunately, the Labour Party's website is wrong - Jamie's birthday is not in March, but it is the same as his predecessor, Jack Cunningham, in August. The only "evidence" to back this fact up is this - my mum is the "Constituency Assistant" for Jamie's constituency of Copeland, England, and works for him - I've seen his birthday down on a calendar. She just told me the other day that she had just had to contact another website which had his birthdate wrong... perhaps it's wrong on the Labour website so as not to start conspiracy rumours of the vote being rigged or something similar... Skarloey 20 February 2006
:hmmm.... whilst there's no reason not to beleive you, we're better going with the wrong 'official' information than possbily-accurate unofficial info, I think. Robdurbar 09:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: This page needs a photo to be found Matthewfelgate 22:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Café con leche

message: A pinch of salt?? Not in spain, or never heard of, and I'm a local guy...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.224.48.92 (talk) 10:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe the normal milk:cofee ratio is more like 2:1. This beverage uses dark coffee and you would have to ask for a "café con leche cargado" ("coffee with milk, loaded") to get a 1:1 ratio. In this line of thought, if you ask for "café con leche muy cargado" ("coffee with milk, very loaded") you might even get milk:coffee 1:2, with a very dark color and very bitter taste unless you add a lot of sugar.
*I agree, 1:1 is more milk than usual; my Ybor City-raised abuela always mixed it about 3:2. I guess it's different in different places and according to taste. The article should be updated to reflect that, imo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeng8r (talk • contribs) 13:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blaze- Do you have your ratio backwards? What you described is leche con cafe, imo... :-) Zeng8r (talk) 13:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the Milk-to-Coffee ratio right?
Talk:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2003

message: The Merge sounds like a great idea, as the combined page shows both sides of the conflict. Dothivalla 20:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a desperate lack of citations in this article. I have added a few tags, but frankly can't be bothered to go through the whole article. As it stands it's a rotten article. DuncanHill (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations lacking 
Talk:Lerner index

message: Moved comment by User:130.166.243.21 off of article page:
"where e is demand elasticity. [Are you sure? My textbook says that equation holds only in the case of a pure monopoly.]
The Lerner Index must be between 0 and 1 for profit-maximizing monopolies."--Bkwillwm 20:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: e is demand elasticity

message: I don't think Microsoft is a good example of monopoly. And web hosting is most definitely a bad example of a highly competitive market. I would rather use conventional examples (like the ones you see on high school or university textbooks) or redirect to the Monopoly article. Unless someone supports them, I will remove this examples. --_N_e_g_r_u_l_i_o 20:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples: ¿NPOV? 

message: Lerner index can be used to measure the market power of any firm, not just monopolistic firms. Have edited article accordingling
142.1.146.61 (talk) 11:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just monopolies
Template talk:Britishmetros

message: As Llandudno's Great Orme Tramway is a street-running tramway used as a public transport service I feel it definately belongs on this template. Birkenhead might too. User:Tom walker, 20:42 GMT, 24 February 2006.
I am trying to think of a counter example for this, but failing, if the Isle of Man is in the UK, then what about the Douglas Tram?  It is definately used as public transport, but is also mainly a tourist attraction.  John 22:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Isle of Man systems are certainly a possibility. Another would be to change the template to the UK and Ireland and including Dublin (Luas, DART) as well. ProhibitOnions 13:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Orme Tramway

message: Shouldn't DLR be on here if Tramlink is? --87.82.9.62 17:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is — look under ‘Metros’. Although the name ‘light rail’ usually refers to trams of some sort, the Docklands Light Railway is a fully-separated metro, incapable of operating on streets in its current form because of the third-rail power and automatic operation. David Arthur 18:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DLR

message: shouldn't Merseyrail and North London Line be here?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.130.36 (talk • contribs) 
No. These are part of the National Rail network and are not metro systems. Simply south 13:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: inclusion

message: Preston will be getting a metro system soon, which I'm sure most people will know about, so when will that be added, if at all? Tez011 (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preston
Talk:Learning/to do

message: I would like to see more attention to social constructivism.  Vygotsky has taught us much about learning.  Also it would be helpful to point out the ideological consequences of learning, and discussing Freire's pedagogy of the oppressed, Brookfield's learning as ideology critique, and Mezirow's transformative learning would lead to a more complete discussion of learning.Finally, learning and development are much the same thing.  There needs to be discussion of epistemological, cognitive, moral, and other types of human development, which co-occur with other types of learning (see reading list).
Learning is a complex umbrella topic that might be well suited to several subcategories for example: historical thoughts on learning (from caves to early agriculture- teaching the next generation required skills through dance, song, and narrative history). Ancient Greek thoughts on learning. Islamic Scholarships influence and thoughts on learning. Middle Ages-From Dark to Enlightened learning. Psychologies impact on learning- does behavior matter? Social Constructivism and Activism views on Learning- Pablo Friere- Pedagogy of the Oppressed? What role does emancipation of our perspective and view play in learning and education. Mezirow and Associates (2000) Transformational Learning- are events that shift our beliefs and systems of our beliefs really transformational learning? -to me a Wiki page on Learning should cover all of these issues within development and change in people. We are oppressed sometimes by our own limiting beliefs or perspectives- getting past that in written form for an encyclopedia would be a good thing- be inclusive in perspective and view. I saw some value ladden statements and name calling in the section- learning is many things- and very broad overall as a topical area.
: I disagree, your wants seem to be more about the philosophy, politics, or history of learning/education. You also confuse learning with instruction or education, a common error. This page can provide links to such pages, but it should stick to a scientific perspective of learning--what is it, what kinds are thought to exist, what variables are thought to affect learning. The concept is large enough without including related information.Robotczar (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Tessitura

message: Tessitura has a number of definitions. When dealing with the tessitura of a piece, it is the range that the majority of the song is written. Generally, this should correlate with the tessitura of the instrument performing it, whether it be voice, saxophone, or whatever. The tessitura of any instrument is the range where it sounds best, as you were saying. For example, I sing counter-tenor, and my tessitura is G3 to C5. I can hit up to F5, and down to D3, but they don't sound as good as the notes in the middle of my range. It's the same for instruments. Sure, you can throw some of the low bass into falsetto by adjusting your embouchure, but it doesn't sound nearly as good as the highest quality notes. 
130.108.202.182 (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: "the music written for the role of Siegfried ranges from C♯3 to C5, but the tessitura is described as high because the tenor phrases are most often in the range of C4 to A5.[1]"
This sounds a bit confusing...isn't an A5 higher than C5? I feel like whoever wrote it meant to say "the range of C4 to A4", as the convention in terms of the number after the letter changes on the C, not the A. A5 is in the the upper soprano range.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.233.51.154 (talk) 07:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Nick Anderson (basketball)

message: I am not sure when, but their was a brawl between him and Michael Jordan, I know it was in a playoff series, someone could put that in--Gusiman 20:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text below appeared in an older version of the article. I took it out as unreferenced controversial material.
I remember reading about Anderson's free throw shooting somewhere (in Sports Illustrated? ESPN the Magazine?) as part of a feature on sports psychology. If someone can find the reference, we can return this text to the article. A quote by Anderson or a psychologist describing the disorder would be valuable also.
Psychological disorder
Anderson is well known for his role in sports psychology. After missing four pivotal free throws in the 1995 NBA Championships that led to the defeat of the Orlando Magic by the Houston Rockets, Anderson developed a psychological problem that greatly affected his free throw shooting. His free throw percentage dipped sharply and dropped to 40% at one point. He had developed a fear of shooting free throws as a result of his belief that his missed free throws in the NBA Finals caused the Magic to lose. This was an anomaly as he was considered to be a great shooter. After the help of sports psychologists, Anderson improved his free throw shooting but showed signs of his fear again during the last year of his NBA career.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Raddick (talk • contribs) 16:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychological disorder with free throw shooting 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved  :Nick Anderson → Nick Anderson (basketball) Nick Anderson (disambiguation) → Nick Anderson      Kadzi   (talk) 11:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 April 2021
Talk:Wood Brothers Racing

message: this is simply a press release and provides very little information on the team. The quotes provided are thoroughly pointless and of questionable POV Drdisque 02:13, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apparently, Wood Brothers and JTG Racing have merged their operations and are now one team. Should this be reflected in Wikipedia? I propose taking both the JTG and Wood Brothers articles (the racing section anyway), and merging them both into one, new article, Wood Brothers/JTG Racing. Feedback and consenus, of course, are welcome. --D-Day What up? Am I cool, or what? 13:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just merged them. Please adjust as neccessary. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 16:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It surprises me that "The Silver Fox" is not listed as a notable driver for the Wood Brothers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaeaman787 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: David Pearson in "notables" list

message: the page now only features JTG racing while in reality, JTG spilt away from Wood Bros. We need the old Wood Bros. page back and a seprate page for JTG. I will try to fix page by reverting the previous edits. but JTG racing is no longer with Wood Bros. Racing. Braandpantiesmatch (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Promblem with Page

message: I rather think the mechanics on the German pre-WW2 Mercedes and Auto-Union teams might take issue with this rather dubious statement. Mr Larrington (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: they might, but it's generally accepted that the Woods first recognized the importance of the time spent in pitstops, and focused on coordinated teamwork to minimize it.  Which, as noted in the article, is why Ford used them in the Indy 500.  Bear in mind that the 500 was then closely watched by F1 teams, so the modern F1 practice is also directly traceable to the Woods.  I'm going to remove the "dubious" note in the article, since there's nothing dubious about it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:380:130B:0:0:0:BA4D (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Invented the modern pit stop??
Talk:Out-group homogeneity

message: There is an article that appears under that sub-heading now in
Wikipedia. However, I wonder whether it really merits its own section, and whether it could go in the section on Prejudice to make that section more "psychological" in scope. I note that the article, although generally accurate, does not mention that on occasion, there can be overestimation of homogeneity of one's ingroup, although this is an exception to the general rule that people think that there  ingroups are more heterogeneous than outgroups. Also,  I think that Patricia Linville, and perhaps some other psychologists,  could be mentioned in connection with this toipc. 195.93.21.105 20:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As an extremely belated response to your comment, there is a considerable amount of research on this topic and I think any reasonable portrayal of that research would require its own page. Also, I changed the name to be a little more concise and a little less judgemental. Andrew (talk) 04:57, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Borehole

message: Can anyone explain in fine detail what 'hand auger bore holes' are?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.27.114 (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I have added the paragraph refering to the use of the term borehole in various Engineering disciplines including Environmental Consulting. This section should likley be expanded as I have not covered it in any great detail, but there is a great deal more information related to it's use in environmental assessment alone. It may be perhaps best suited to a completly new article. Dirkblack 20:58, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Engineering Disciplines

message: Good Lord, this article sucks. A large part of it ought to be merged with water well, though apparently someone wanted to make a distinction between drilled wells and hand-dug or hand-operated wells, and created this article. The article also reads partly like it's from some sort of brochure promoting the use of drilled wells in the third world, rather than discussing the possible uses of boreholes.  I've started on a rewrite of it; I'll try to fix the rest later. Argyriou (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewriting 

message: As usual I find myself following Argyriou around to terms used in the professional earth/engineering/geology fields and agree completely with both comments above. I tried to help this one out but the only way to save it I think is for someone to have the courage to remove nearly the entire section on boreholes used as water wells. Then it can be properly redone describing boreholes as boreholes. I'm afraid we must kill this baby to save it. Drillerguy 18:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs major redo 

message: Having heard no response otherwise, I removed most of the previous writing using the term "borehole" as a misnomer for rural water wells. The water wells article (while still not great) overtook anything of value on the old version of this page. If the original authors would like to contribute regarding the use of boreholes as water wells please do so in the water wells article rather than here. Thanks! Drillerguy 17:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed most discussion as a water well 
Talk:University of Copenhagen Nano-Science Center

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University of Copenhagen Center for Planetary Research

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:University of Copenhagen Center for the Philosophy of Nature and Science Studies

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:UCPH Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Niels Bohr Institute for Astronomy, Physics and Geophysics

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:UCPH Department of Mathematical Sciences

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Andrew Diey

message: I have cleaned and wikified this article as much as I could in one sitting. I have also removed a portion of the article ("We have in-house experience at major UK games companies. We are also very active...") which reads like an advertisement. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 21:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup/Wikify
Talk:UCPH Department of Chemistry

message: On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page.   I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability.  They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles.  The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected.  I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Roleplay simulation

message: Smells of advertising to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.24.39 (talk • contribs) 
-- Me too -- advertising for the roleplaysim.org website and its goods.  I've put the  and  tags on it.Cleduc 03:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: spam

message: Xbox PlayStation Nintendo  24.1.141.103 (talk) 22:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What devices can you play Farming Simulator on