Talk:The Brick House

message: That's a lot of collectives. Jamiem 02:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be about the Old Brycc House if using the name Brycc House. The name needs to be changed to The Brick House to conform to the subject of the article for accuracy. The article needs in line references to be listed. Some of the external links should be removed and used as in line references instead. These are just some of the immediate things that need work. -Jahnx (talk) 12:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support Due to the name The Brycc House now being defunct and the organization is now known as The Brick House I believe the move to conform to the current name and use. The article is also about the current Brick House and only mentions The Bycc House for notability purposes. Jahnx (talk) 08:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I was looking at User talk:Openbrick and see that an article on the same subject was once deleted.  Is it notable enough to even bother renaming?--Bedford (talk) 08:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I considered deletion of the article after reading. However the article was made in 2006 after reviewing the history. I believe this was the origional article covering the BRYCC House and now it has garnered the life of the Brick House, much like the Brick House Louisville. This article might have notability as a community center, however it doesn't have much of a case unless its cleaned up. So the question is it worth the trouble? Jahnx (talk) 12:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm pretty sure there was a full-length article about this group in both the CJ and LEO. If someone really wanted the sources are probably there. --W.marsh 16:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I perfromed an overhaul on cleaning this article up. I'll be posting it for reassessment soon. -Jahnx (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Once deleted

message: Substituted at 08:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Brick House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wxbh.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060109080000/http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20050413%2FLEOBEAT0101%2F50413022%2F-1%2FLEO to http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20050413%2FLEOBEAT0101%2F50413022%2F-1%2FLEO
*Added  tag to http://media.www.louisvillecardinal.com/media/storage/paper964/news/2005/04/12/Features/The-House.That.Brick.Built-2225387.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131003085226/http://leoweekly.com/news-features/major-stories/features/%E2%80%98black-hole%E2%80%99 to http://leoweekly.com/news-features/major-stories/features/%E2%80%98black-hole%E2%80%99
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This was never notable enough, and its own website has not been updated since 2011. Literaturegirl (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: i disagree, there are enough citations from secondary sources to establish notability. Mujinga (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be deleted