lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Archaeoceratopsidae

message: What reference is there placing Kulceratops and Liaoceratops in Archaeoceratopsidae, or did this ever get recovered in any phylogenetic analysis?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.245.160.85 (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if there is any support. J. Spencer (talk) 01:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no support, then wouldn't the placement be completely unsourced?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.245.160.75 (talk) 20:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support?
Talk:Neutrophilia

message: There are many symptoms since I have suffered from it. Could you add symptoms for this article? Thanks.
--Nancyinthehouse (talk) 05:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symptoms 

message: One thing you may want to note about CML- regardless of the white cell count the LAP is generally low.
152.23.52.214 18:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  just wanted to let you know... 

message: It would be good if someone could explain what the "left" part of the left shift actually means, i.e. from where the term is derived.  The article explains what it is, but not really what it means, if that makes sense. B.Rossow · talk 15:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left shift 
Talk:Protoceratopsid

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Protoceratopsidae
I'll be editing this article for a class, and I've already updated the intro.  I think that it would be appropriate to change the title to Protoceratopsidae to match other dinosaur group titles on Wikipedia, but I'm not sure how to do that yet.ADCordova (talk) 02:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Another State of Mind (film)

message: the article reads not like an encyclopedia article but a school paper or a critical review. 68.100.218.124 (talk) 02:17, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of Writing 

message: Seems like the deaths of people since the film was made should be cited? Ex. I can't find anything about Louis Dufau's death with a quick Google search Ccheever (talk) 11:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths
Talk:University City High School (Missouri)

message: I'd recommend moving this article to "University City High School (Missouri)," since U. City High is not actually in St. Louis. Any opinions? Deor 04:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Marty Ehrlich - jazz musician.  I know he's from University City, but can anyone confirm he went to U. City high school?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.143.231.59 (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: possible University City high school alumnus
Talk:Information security/Archive 1

message: This page needs a lot of work. --ZeWrestler  Talk 20:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to dive in and help out, or to make suggestions about how to fix things. — Matt Crypto 21:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As sooon as i finish grad school aps and midterms, I will. --ZeWrestler  Talk 05:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree with you interpretation of the language.  I think that sentence, and particularly the use of the word "right", implies "and not wrong." I.e., the right info to the right people at the right time, and not the wrong info, wrong people, or wrong time.--The Yar 19:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The above comments are fairly old and so you are less likely to receive a response. Anyway, you don't need permission to edit pages. See Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages and Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. —Centrx?talk • 15:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page can use a lot of work. 

message: Monday 8 January 2006.  Convinced myself to commit to total rewrite of article.
Developed an outline for the article on my User page.
Tuesday 9 January.  Inserted "Underconstruction" template at top of article
and updated Wikipedia:WikiProject_Laundromat#Cleaning in progress page.
Wednesday 10 January.  Replaced introductory paragraphs and included table
of contents (affectively a proposed outline).  Also started work on the
Brief history section - need some help with this.  Most history deals only
with computer security.  I believe Information Security is broader and
older than computer security.
Should try to add a statement about why Info Sec is important into
introductory paragraph.
Basic principles section may need to be reordered and trimmed down a
little.  Could fold some subjects together as section is filled in.
Need info about Info Sec laws outside of USA.
Need info about professional organizations outside of USA.
WideClyde 18:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  committed to total rewrite
Talk:Krishanti Kumaraswamy

message: This is one of the most brutal killings in Sri Lankan ethnic conflict by the Government Forces, Kirshanthi was only a little school girl. We need to include more information about her. If you know anything more about the story please contact me ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 04:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so your comment, will do RaveenS 04:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Google search yields thsi much  and  RaveenS 19:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Most Brutal
Talk:Rebbachisauridae

message: Support:  Per the discussion at WT:DINO, in an attempt to streamline the organization of higher-order clades, these merges are proposed for the following reasons:
#The articles to be merged are stubs.
#The articles to be merged are node-based clades with very little independent content that could be added in the foreseeable future to expand them.  (WP:N)
#All of the information in these two articles are relevant to discussion of rebbachisaurid classification, which is already covered by the article Rebbachisauridae.  (WP:REDUNDANT)
#"Rebbachisauridae" has over 450 results on google scholar vs only 11 for "Khebbashia" and 22 for "Rebbachisaurinae".  In fact, a search for "Rebbachisaurinae" will return, "Did you mean 'Rebbachisauridae'?".  (WP:N)
#Similar sub-family-level taxa with low species counts already exist as solo articles (i.e. Pachycephalosauria, Heterodontosauridae, Megalosauridae, Alvarezsauridae, Oviraptoridae, etc.), and this merge would improve article format consistency for WP:DINO.
A Cynical Idealist (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposals for [[Khebbashia]] and [[Rebbachisaurinae]]
Talk:Allosauridae

message: "Some key evolutionary novelties of allosaurids are the evenly round face..." -- Sorry, what does this mean? Looks like it might be a translation from technical-speak to colloquial, but it's difficult to understand. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 00:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the whole section, as it was mostly generalities that apply to a lot of big theropods, not just allosaurids. J. Spencer (talk) 01:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Evenly round face"??
Talk:Spinosauroidea

message: Move back to Megalosauroidea? J. Spencer (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Anybody? J. Spencer (talk) 17:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are we going by which the ICZN says is valid, or which the literature treats as valid? Dinoguy2 (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it all comes down to Megalosaurus.  If Meg is in, then it's Megalosauroidea and Megalosauridae.  If Meg is indeterminate, then it's Spinosauroidea and Torovosauridae.  Right now, it seems like Meg is in. J. Spencer (talk) 00:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But, IIRC, the reason this page was switched to Spinosauroidea initially (I was fighting for Megalosauroidea) is that a lot of editors were pointing out that in the actual lit, even when Meg was in, authors were still using Spinosauroidea, rules of priority be damned. Dinoguy2 (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Benson's using it now, FWIW (both in the Cruxicheiros description and the Megalosaurus redescription). J. Spencer (talk) 00:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. I didn't even have this page on my watchlist. Are we just talking the two papers here and here? A quick search of the Paleobiology database indicates Holtz (1995) was among the last authors to use Megalosauroidea, while Spinosauroidea caught on from '95 (at the naming) to fairly recent papers. Firsfron of Ronchester 12:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Megalosauridae

message: Shouldn't there be something about Torvosauridae here? Benosaurus 01:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is, in the second paragraph.  We'll get the consistency bugs worked out. J. Spencer 04:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Torvosauridae 

message: The article says that they had sharp teeth and 3 claws on each hand, but so did all the carnosaurs. 122.109.250.74 (talk) 07:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just part of a general description, not qualifying characteristics. Given the poor state of knowledge about Megalosaurus, there probably aren't any reliable ways to tell if something is a megalosaurid by looking at it; megalosaurid is in use as a traditional thing.  You could make a more abstract definition, like "all megalosauroid theropods closer to Megalosaurus than Spinosaurus", but that doesn't define their features, either. J. Spencer (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Cladistic classifications are based on relationships, not key features. According to Tom Holtz's definition (2004), a megalosaurid is any dinosaur more closely related to Megalosaurus than to Spinosaurus, Allosaurus, or modern birds. Dinoguy2 (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What makes a Megalosaurid?
Talk:Alvarezsauridae

message: This merge proposal is part of a broad project in WP:DINO to consolidate as many of the superfluous clades as possible (WP:REDUNDANT) and make coverage of dinosaurs much more streamlined.  To this end, Alvarezsauridae is an ideal candidate to merge into Alvarezsauroidea for the following reasons:
#Most of the content is redundant.  The majority of the Alvarezsoauridea article is about alvarezsaurids.
#Most of the scientific literature on these animals treats Alvarezsauroidea as a single whole, rather than two groups distinct enough to warrant separate publications for any given issue.
A mock up of the merged article can be seen here in my sandbox.  Comments are welcome.
--A Cynical Idealist (talk) 18:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Oviraptoridae

message: Our article says "and this traditional division into crestless and crested forms artificial", and links to the Anzu description, which mentions no such thing. The families are not defined by the crests anyway, but by forelimb proportions and number of sacral vertebrae. So where has it been suggested these subfamilies are invalid, and are they even widely rejected? I can find a reference to Oviraptorinae being paraphyletic, but not Ingeniinae. FunkMonk (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subfamilies 

message: "There does appear to be a ghost lineage when it comes to Oviraptorids since their fossil record is lacking with a huge expanse of time between their last common ancestor with the caenegnathids during the early Cretaceous and their first appearance in the fossil record during the Late Cretaceous." Bubblesorg (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That depends entirely on whether you have a reliable source to back that up. FunkMonk (talk) 10:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair, I do. For some reason I am having trouble putting them in a talk page.--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  May I put the following in the article?
Talk:Alpha Herculis

message: There are two statements in this article which are ambiguous.
First: "This star's mass is on the border that explodes as a supernova or not." To which of the four components of the star system does the phrase "This star's mass" refer?
Second: "Ras Algethi has a diameter approximately 460 times greater than..." Is the diameter cited the seperation between the binary systems, or is it the diameter of one of the four stellar components?
Mtiffany71 05:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity

message: In recent days there have been two attempts to move this article to Rasalgethi (binary) which have been reversed both for failure to consult and because there were reasons for the present title of the page. I thought it might be useful to set out my reasoning for why the attempted move was a bad idea. First, the traditional name Rasalgethi refers to the point of light in the sky that Bayer later designated Alpha Herculis. As such, this name applied to the whole of Alpha Herculis because it dates to well before the invention of the telescope that is necessary to resolve its components! And that's how it appears on star charts, which only show the point of light. The article states that Alpha Herculis is a triple star system consisting of a single star and a binary pair (it probably needs updating - it appears to actually be two binary pairs). And since 2016, the IAU has been regularising the names of stars. As part of that it decided that names should apply to single stars only, not stellar systems. So, whether using the traditional or approved name of Rasalgethi, Rasalgethi (binary) is incorrect - there is no binary of that name! The difference between the traditional and approved usage of the name speaks to the second reason for keeping the title as Alpha Herculis - it is simply much more convenient! It is clear what Alpha Herculis refers to; less so for Rasalgethi. Cuddlyopedia (talk) 07:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Rasalgethi (binary) would be a poor name both because it is inaccurate and because it adds little clarity in the event that it might be confused with some other Rasalgethi.  As it happens, there is no other Rasalgethi, so the possible alternate name for the article would simply be Rasalgethi, currently a redirect to Alpha Herculis.  Lithopsian (talk) 09:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested page move
Talk:Louis Rose

message: With some clean-up, this article, Louis Rose, should perhaps be nominated after being considered for inclusion to the California Wiki-Project. Rose reads like he belongs in the Who's Who of San Diego history. I have begun clean-up on the article as I found it in an orphan abandoned status. I believe the California Wiki Project tag should also be placed on it. Any ideas?   Ronbo76 17:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured article [[Louis Rose]] status? 
Talk:Khmer National Armed Forces

message: Hello, I noticed there was a gap in the former states of Cambodia so I created Kingdom of Cambodia (1975-76); any help in expanding this stub would be much appreciated. Cheers, walk victor falk talk 04:46, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with stub: [[Kingdom of Cambodia (1975-76)]] 
Talk:Holling C. Holling

message: This page calls him an American, the "Paddle to the Sea" page has him as a Canadian. Which is correct? Trinite 05:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He seems to have been born in Michigan, so he should be an American.  Mdazey 22:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin? 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Any information about why or when Holling changed his name, and why he took the same name for his first and last name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.195.30 (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: I remember seeing a 16mm school movie in which Holling tells how he wrote Pagoo, describing the long path from original concept, writing, illustrating, rewriting and finally getting it published.  Anyone know the name or status of this film?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.195.30 (talk) 04:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational film 
Talk:Flexity Swift

message: The article currently asserts the Flexity Outlook is a legacy design originally developed by a company Bombardier acquired.  The Flexity Outlook also made this assertion -- but without any references.  I asked for references.  I couldn't find any, and no one else provided any.  
I added a  to that assertion here too.
If this assertion can't be referenced it should be removed.  Geo Swan (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: explanation

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Flexity Swift. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:25, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bombardier Flexity Swift →  – I propose that this article be renamed in order to match the name changes made to other pages related to Bombardier transportation products that are now made by Alstom. See Alstom Flexity and Alstom Aventra.
Some sentence changes will be needed but see the two articles I’ve linked to see what would need to change. Maurice Oly (talk) 01:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 November 2022
Talk:List of Tunis Metro stations

message: The result was to keep the article for expansion.
----
As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. While the Tunis metro is, in principle, certainly a valid topic for an article, this particular one is in a very bad state. It does not give any context, justs lists the stations, and in that respect is quite unencyclopedic. There seems to be no other article about the metro where this one could be merged. So, can (and should) the article be improved, or would it be better to discard it? Opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 12:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To start with keep. There are some great FA classed article on various metros across the world. Just because this is not a first world industrialised English speaking country doesn't mean we should delete this article because it isn't great (WP:Worldview or something). Generally speaking (i think) there is some policy somewhere, that all railway stations (and that's what most metro's are rather than tram stops) are notable. Thirdly lists are perfectly valid on Wikipedia (we have "featured lists" !) so we can't moan there. Overall its a starting point, and without any of the right kind of sources to hand or local knowledge (and language skills) i can't personally help this article much more. Pickle 15:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert review
Talk:Valkenburg

message: is there a category "burgs in Holland"?  What passes as a mountain in Holland? István 05:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Burg" means castle, not mountain. "Berg" is mountain. For example, the highest point of the province of Groningen is the Hasseberg. It is 14 meters above sea level. -- Eugène van der Pijll 12:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the confirmation, the page is now corrected. I suppose there's no Koninklijke Nederlandse Bergreddingsdienst then? István 13:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Twilight Zone (radio series)

message: I was trying to clean up this article a bit and got thinking that since this is a radio series shouldn't it be organized by season instead of what cd volume it was in? (76.178.198.142 (talk) 12:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Orginization

message: I have expanded the episodes list to include the episodes released to CD in 2007 by CBS Special Products. As they are clearly connected to the radio show and the CD packaging says they were broadcast, I assume this to be the case, but if by chance any of the episodes were produced for CD release only, then this should be updated accordingly. 68.146.47.196 19:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: I was listening to Sirius Radio and they were broadcasting what sounds like a Twilight Zone radio show from the 1960s. Anyone know anything about this? Or were these simply radio broadcasts of the TV show? 23skidoo 15:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier radio show?

message: The article says, To date eight episodes have also been released to CD in two volumes by CBS Special Products; as of the summer of 2007, the releases (more have been announced) are being sold exclusively at Movie Gallery and Hollywood Video stores in the US and Canada.
However, Falcon Picture Group's own website twilightzoneradio.com shows 130 episodes having been released to CD.  Are the CBS volumes any different from the Falcon volumes?  It's also curious how this article is more up to date than Falcon's website, which only shows 13 volumes for sale.  Where is this article sourcing its information from? ~ Agvulpine (talk) 08:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's at least 5 different releases I can see: twilightzoneradio.com has digital downloads, 4 packs (labeled as "collections" with 4 episodes, example), and 10 packs (labeled as "volumes" with 10 episodes), there are also 2 disc packs of 4 episodes also labeled as volumes. Also of course there is the radio broadcasts. Each one follows a completely different release order unfortunately, and many of the physical sets are sold out on the site. Any thoughts about how to add all that in, if at all?--Ben (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different sets of CD releases?