Talk:Waynesville, North Carolina

message: Do we need two entries for Frog Level in the article?  At first looking at it I thought about killing the one listed in "Neighborhoods" but Frog Level is still a neighborhood.  I definately think the entry in the "History" section needs to stay since Frog Level was a key player in the early growth of the town.  Perhaps the answer is to combine the History and Neighborhoods sections.  Any thoughts?  --Brownings 12:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Frog Level (21 Aug 2006)

message: I noticed a user with only an IP address removed the section on Political controversies.  Do we want this section removed, or should it be readded since there was zero discussion on the removal?  --Brownings 10:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no discussion whatsoever and it should not have been removed.  I have re-added it.  If someone has a specific reason as to why it should not be there, let's hear it. SmartGuy 15:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsourced, and removed. Thank you --CutOffTies (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Political section removed

message: The statement "A USGS survey marker at the old Haywood County Courthouse in downtown Waynesville lists the altitude as 2752 feet above sea level." is an odd way to define the elevation of a city.  There are at least 29 USGS benchmarks in the immediate vicinity, why pick that one?  Besides, BM COURT HOUSE has elevation 2718.3ft according to NGS:
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds_desig.prl
Actually BM WAYNESVILLE has elevation 2818ft, why not use that?  
I don't really have a problem with the 2752 elevation, it just doesn't seem justifiable to pick a BM at random.  Interestingly, a USGS name lookup on Waynesville gives an elevation of 3600ft, which is not justifiable from looking at the topo maps.  Ryan 128.173.36.149 23:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevation?

message: I've removed some biased language from the Battle of Waynesville section to restore a neutral point of view. Garand70 18:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The "Battle" of Waynesville

message: :Image:Waynesvillelogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  The logo won't get zapped now.  --Brownings (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Waynesvillelogo.jpg

message: The U.S. Census has the 2009 population at 10,191. So maybe do away with all of the county/state estimates?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.196.160.175 (talk) 05:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Waynesville, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified