Talk:Argentine Navy

message: <quote>The COAN (Spanish: Comando de Aviación Naval) and not CANA as is commonly wrong shortened by some foreign bibliography, has 4 main airbases:<quote>
The phrasing of this sentencer really bothers me.  Does anyone else feel that it looks a little POV? // 3R1C 19:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pls feel free to correct the style but should be noted that the acronym is COAN and not CANA as several bibliografy shows --Jor70 00:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Aviation 

message: I've read another acronym: FLOta de Mar ARgentina — FLOMAR here -> . Should it replace COFM? Necessary Evil 18:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont know where it come out that COFM, FLOMAR is a very common term not only in ARA but among south american navies Jor70 19:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you look the official Argentinian Navy website (http://www.ara.mil.ar/comandos.asp) you can see that the ARA "cutting edge" is subdivided in four "Commandos Operativos" (Operational Commands): "Flota de Mar" (Sea Fleet), "Fuerza de Submarinos" (Submarine Force), "Aviacion Naval" (Naval Aviation) and "Infanteria de Marina" (Marine Infantry). So my guess is that in the acronyms, the letters "CO" come from the initials from of "Comando Operativo" and the other 2 letters, from those of the name of the respective command (eg: "AN" from "Aviacion Naval") and not from the word "COmando". I couldn't find the acronyms in the website, so my comment is an "educated guess" (IMHO). Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FLOMAR 

message: Wouldn't it be Navy of the Argentine Republic as the preferred translation into English? I notice it was moved without discussion in July Narson 21:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone ahead and moved it as no-one seemed to object and the old name was a pretty unusual translation (Seemed to be some attempt at a compromise between the spanish and the English name) Narson (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could someone provide the evidence to show when the Argentine Navy came into being. I ask this because the Republic of Argentina did not come into being until 1853, although there was a short period of Argentine Confederation. In the absence of evidence that it was actually called the Argentine Navy at its inception, it would properly be the navy of the United Provinces of South America.
86.16.134.133 (talk) 14:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Their history trace back to the 1810 May Revolution with their first combat to be 2 march 1811 (see official site). Regarding the name see Name of Argentina --Jor70 (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I didn't ask about "their" history. I asked about the origin of the naming. I find it hard to believe that the United Provinces of South America would decide to call its navy something other than the name of the country. It would be like the Virgina Navy calling itself the United States Navy years before the United States came into being. Surely we strive for accuracy. So I ask again: where is the evidence that it was called the Argentine Navy before 1853?
Agent0060 14:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  First please calm down and second I already referred you to the origin of the Name Argentina what obviously is applied to all argentine things, read the article, what do you want ? a tape recorder  interview of Guillermo Brown ? --Jor70 (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am quite calm, thank you. So far. I think it quite obvious that the name "Argentine Navy" cannot properly be used for any date prior to 1836 or, at best, 1826. So, before we attribute the name to the organisation for any time prior to those dates, we should have a verifiable source. Agent0060 16:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: :Image:LNMAB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:LNMAB.jpg

message: Hi All, can't believe that no one yet mentioned the Argentine Navy day, which is celebrated on May 17th, anniversary of the victory achieved in 1814 in the Battle of Montevideo. I've added the corresponding paragraph and supporting reference ("History" page in the ARA official website, in spanish).  Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 09:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARA Day 

message: Hi all, this article now includes several pictures and visually looks "wrong" to me (leaving lots of "empty" spaces in the text). I propose to leave a few pics embedded in the text where appropriate, and move the rest to a new "Gallery" section (as seen in other wikiarticles). If there is no reasonable opposition will do this "ASAIC" (ie: "as soon as I can" 8D).  Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quite a few pics - proposal 

message: Hi, I've noticed that the fleet is currelntly shown in a more complex and less clear way (IMHO) than what used to be (up to Revision as of 2010-05-07T14:09:45). Can anyone please justify why the former layout was discarded? Otherwise I'll reformat the section following the previous layout and structure (but maybe keeping some features of the new layout).  Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 15:13, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New layout for the "Fleet" section - Why? 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Faa.gif Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Argentine Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716035228/http://www.segurancaedefesa.com/Foudre2ARA.html to http://www.segurancaedefesa.com/Foudre2ARA.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307170103/http://www.mindef.gov.ar/info.asp?Id=1373 to http://www.mindef.gov.ar/info.asp?Id=1373
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160312065320/http://www.gacetamarinera.com.ar/nota.asp?idNota=2432&idSec=7 to http://www.gacetamarinera.com.ar/nota.asp?idNota=2432&idSec=7
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100325090856/http://www.bravozulu.com.ar/programas.php to http://www.bravozulu.com.ar/programas.php
*Added  tag to http://www.saorbats.com.ar/ORBAT%20-%20Argentina%20-%20ARA.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Not accurate trial sentence, just a amarillist's post's SandmanNet (talk) 22:46, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not true