lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Investor relations

message: Added link to public relations and reference to Dept. of Labor. Removed unecessary words for clarity. Added section on Sarbanes-Oxley Act.--Axiomatica 21:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Material and Cleanup

message: Did some cleanup on this article. It looks like its origin was as a non-notable company article, but was later trimmed to make it a more general description of the concept.  As it stands the article is ok, but it could use sourcing and expansion. --Lendorien 16:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: The flagged segment reflects a third party's personal opinion and potentially offers a guideline to the reader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.179.77.220 (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection
Talk:Treaty of Apamea

message: According to the treaty, west of Tarsus was to be surrendered to Roman Empire. But according to the third paragraph of this article Antiochus  kept Cicilia. Well, Tarsus is situated rather to the east part of Cicilia. So if west of Tarsus were to be abandoned, Antiochus III couldn't keep Cilicia save a small area in the east. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction   

message: I am proposing a merge for this page into Syrian War (192–189 BC). It's the peace treaty which ends the war; a short separate article on the treaty itself can easily fit into the article on the war itself. In effect, WP:OVERLAP. (Pinged all non-IP users with edits more than 10pc of the page.) Ifly6 (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up.  It could go either way.  The main thing is that there's some knock-on effects of the Treaty where only the treaty is really relevant, and the rest of the Roman-Seleucid War isn't.  This is most notably the "enforcement" action around 162 BCE that helped destabilize Lysias where some ships were burnt & elephants slain, as well as the general lack of funds that caused money shortages.  I'd weakly favor keeping this a separate article just for ease of referencing just-the-peace-terms for articles on those later periods, but could certainly be convinced if others feel otherwise.  SnowFire (talk) 04:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't something like that rather easily fit into something like an  section? Ifly6 (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, nobody else has weighed in.  Thought about this some more, and think that there should probably be a separate article for this for consistency if nothing else - we seem to have separate articles on other treaties, such as the Peace of Antalcidas (King's Peace) or the Roman–Jewish Treaty.  That said, I do agree that including most if not all of the content of this article in an "Aftermath" section of the Roman-Seleucid War article is fine.  I'm not normally a fan of it because it hides things, but the  is one way to duplicate content across two articles, but simply having some duplication is fine too.  SnowFire (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think doing an excerpt for this is a good idea. Do you at all know how that template works? Ifly6 (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Syrian War (192–189 BC)]]
Talk:George Shaw (American football)

message: *SHAW TOPS A LIST OF GREATS. The Oregonian, April 22, 1993. Author: TERRY FREI. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion source 

message: I realize there is a tendency to worship the information in Pro Football Reference because it is so convenient — but it does not mean it is always accurate, as anyone spending much time writing biographies from period newspapers can testify. Newspaper sources have Shaw as 5'11" in high school and the rosters in the Colts media guides are consistent in having him at 6'0". The 1960 NFL Roster manual, an official league publication, also has him at 6'0" as a member of the New York Giants. In short, PFR has him listed too tall. Carrite (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Height
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Baelnorn

message: I am really pleased to see all your comments (both "delete" and "keep"). I looks like i wrote at least an article of interest to others.
Thank you all for all the help you gave me.
I put the links of refering campaign settings and novels.
Maybe they are worthy enouggh to keep the article.
Thank you!
--Elestar 16:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Kailey

message: My name is Kailey, and i just want to add that it is simply my mother's "A Shit head" spelling of the Gaelic "Ceili", like the dancers in the skirts, honestly i dont know much beyond that and would not be the least bit surprised if i misspelled the original word myself.
68.61.137.214 13:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's in a name?
Talk:Marshfield, Massachusetts

message: I have removed the links for Anthony Thomas and John Bourne.  While both are commemorated in town as heroes of the American Revolution, neither have their own pages on Wikipedia.  The links that were on this page previously both went to disambiguations of those names, both common and neither including the exact people.  I have also removed the link for Gen. Sawyer for similar reasons. ToddC4176 16:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Residents Section

message: My jaw damn near hit the floor when I saw that 3.54% of Marshfield is Black or African American, largely because having grown up there I can attest that it was always entirely White, save for as many Asian families as there were Chinese restaurants to run (though now there's also two Japanese steakhouse/sushi bars and multiple Southest Asian offerings).  I checked the citation link at the bottom and it gives a much more realistic sounding 0.5%, roughly 1/7 the figure in the article.  Am I looking at an out of date census page, or should the article be amended?  Also, I hope to hear from deeceevoice explaining how, with regard to Daniel Webster "da brotha waz chocolate brown, y'all!  f*ck all a yall racis-a$$ white ppl tryna take credit!"  lpl 24.91.244.221 (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics section  
Talk:Anna Price

message: Just to keep track:
*2007-02-15
*2007-02-16
-Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there going to be any more? — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know... the Max/Tanya storyline is ongoing, so I guess there might be... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 23:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Knowing Max, he will probably have an affair with her! — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh, yeah, he'll be rivalling Phil and Grant soon! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 13:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Sean will be moreso than Max... — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you say that, but Sean's only had Ruby, Preeti and Chelsea so far... Max has had Rachel, Tanya, Gemma and Stacey so far... now, Dennis Rickman on the other hand - Sam Mitchell, Kate Mitchell, Tracy, Joanne Ryan, Sharon Watts and Zoe Slater... what a manwhore! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 23:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearances
Talk:Short Circutz

message: As per he header suggests. 2605:B100:B25:ECB8:0:C:CA5:2E01 (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe short listed as "Pear People" is meant to be "The Adventures of André and Wally B."
Talk:Nea Anchialos

message: You are supposed to write something in the talk page and not just add the tag mate TodorBozhinov. Let me guess then. The main problem here is the addition of the word Bulgarization. It happened, so it shouldn't be difficult to find non-Greek and non-Bulgarian sources. Thanks for leaving fled in the Pomorie article. Left implied that they filled their suitcases, sold (and thus were compensated) for their properties and moved to a place which they had already decided to move to. If it makes you feel better, some Bulgarians also fled parts of Macedonia. Kalambaki2 10:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Shadow Madness

message: Seems a bit biased calling it an "American Final Fantasy", it's no more similar than any other rpg.....
Plus the battle system is fairly unique and I, an Rpg fan, haven't seen a system like it.... other than maybe the Quest 64 game...... 142.167.21.62 03:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased? 
Talk:David J. Brewer

message: The following was added by 70.248.124.117:
I am very sad that the original author of this article did not mention that Mr. Brwer was a devout Christian and served the One, True God. Brewer once said, "I Believe in Jesus Christ as the great Helper, Comforter and Saviour of humanity, and the Holy Bible as bearing to us the story of his mission, the rules of duty, the Revelation of Eternal Life, and also the conditions under which the attainment of that life are possible. No book contains more truths, or is worthy of confidance than the Bible; none brings more joy to the sorrwing, more strength to the week, or more stimulus to the nobly ambitious; none makes life sweeter, or death easier or less sad." I believe the same.
Your opinions are quite dandy but have no place in an encyclopedia article.  If you have a citation for the quote above or some reference for Brewer's religious beliefs--arguably noted based on his published works--please add it.  The comment posted above was appropriate for this talk page but not for the article text itself.  Thehappysmith 18:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/David Josiah Brewer was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: The article says Mr. Brewer attended Wesleyan College, which links to Wesleyan College, which according to our article is an all-female institution and always has been! J S Ayer (talk) 01:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Have redirected the link to Wesleyan University, on the basis of a mention of the Mystic 7. J S Ayer (talk) 01:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right—I did link to Wesleyan University in the "early life" section, but I picked the wrong one in the lead. (The sources, e.g. , actually do call the Connecticut school Wesleyan College, confusingly enough.) Thanks for taking care of it! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wesleyan College is female!
Talk:Territory of Papua and New Guinea

message: The Territory of Papua and New Guinea, officially the Administrative Union of the Territory of Papua and the Territory of New Guinea, was established by an administrative union between the Australian-administered territories of Papua and New Guinea in 1949. In December 1971, the name of the Territory changed to "Papua New Guinea" and in 1975 it became the Independent State of Papua New Guinea.[2]
Administrative Union of the Territory of Papua and the Territory of New Guinea
1949–1975 182.176.68.154 (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Territory of Papua and New Guinea, officially the Administrative Union of the Territory of Papua and the Territory of New Guinea, was established by an administrative union between the Australian-administered territories of Papua and New Guinea in 1949. In December 1971, the name of the Territory changed to "Papua New Guinea" and in 1975 it became the Independent State of Papua New Guinea.[2]  Administrative Union of the Territory of Papua and the Territory of New Guinea 1949–1975
Talk:Tagalog Republic

message: The flag shown in the infobox is Image:Philippines_flag_original.png. The Flag of the Philippines article says that this flag was conceived by Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo.  I am no expert on Philippine history, but my understanding is that Aguinaldo had nothing to do with the Katagalugan Republic or with the flag of that republic.  I see that this page shows a different flag as the flag of the Katagalugan Republic.  What's up? -- Boracay Bill 02:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was move.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag
Talk:Epirus (region)

message: The move to 'Epirus Region' is confusing since there is already an article Epirus (region). After all the region of Epirus does not geographically coincide with the Periphery.Alexikoua (talk) 15:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We could move the present article to Epirus (administrative region) or Epirus (administrative unit) or even back to Epirus (Greece). Constantine   ✍  16:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, adm. region or unit seem ok to me.Alexikoua (talk) 20:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Central Greece Periphery - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: All the "Peripheries" of Greece have been moved to "regions", including this page, and the larger geographical regions is called Epirus. This affects the links to this page that mostly now should link to Epirus. These are several thousand links. My suggestion would be to run a bot that changes all instances of Epirus to Epirus. This might include some legitimate to the administrative region, probably a minor problem.  Andreas  (T) 20:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Most correct links to Epirus (region) are through templates now, and most links for the administrative region are still using the old periphery title I guess. I'll file a bot request. Markussep Talk 10:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to this page 
Talk:Western Greece

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Central Greece Periphery - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Have we not been too quick in closing this discussion and moving all pages? The sources I linked (especially Invest in Greece, the most "official" English-language website found) uses Western Greece but West/East Macedonia, North/South Aegean. I may have done the mistake of changing the list of pages discussed after most users expressed a support vote for a move request for West->Western Greece only. My bad. Place Clichy (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, I had not considered the point you raised, which seems well thought-out, even if OR. As I stated previously, however, I really don't consider this a major issue, and the finer points you raise would be lost to most people (as, indeed, they were to me). I tend to favour consistency in such cases, but I am not going to oppose a move. Constantine   ✍  20:11, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Like I said, I only added the other regions in order to have an automatic notification on their talk pages pointing here, following Constantine's correct mention of them. I agree with PanchoS that accuracy primes consistency here. The trouble at Ggl books/scholar is that a lookup on such terms returns a lot of hits about "West XXX..." in a geographical sense, not the actual administrative region. From Invest in Greece (the only cocnsistent source in English from the Greek government, which uses Western Greece but West/East Macedonia, North/South Aegean and Central Greece/Macedonia), and pvaigaiou.gov.gr (which has a banner saying North Aegean islands), I would be in favour of reverting the moves of West/East Macedonia and North/South Aegean. I may also revert my own edit where I chaged the original move request, if it makes things clearer for other editors in the future. Place Clichy (talk) 10:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure of Move discussion 
Talk:Peloponnese (region)

message: Excuse me but a periphery is not peripheral and has nothing whatever to do with the peripheries of Greece. In Greek it does not mean on the periphery of Greece. It is simply the term for a region. A region is the territory "around" a point of interest, such as a Roman military camp. We don't have the word in English. Instead we have "region." I don't know who got started with the peripheries or why it was allowed to continue but it is fairly pervasive at this point though wrong. I suppose it would be too much to ask for a correction. Apparently, WP's neologism is being brought into the English language. I suppose an editor speaking Greek as a first language coined it. He couldn't get away from the Greek vocabulary so he decided to bring a little more of it into English. No one knows what the heck it is. The peripheries of Greece? Whew, they sure have complicated stuff over there. If those are the peripheries, what do we use for the mainland of Greece? And so on.Dave (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-peripheral peripheries
Talk:Cushan-rishathaim

message: The translations from Smith's (1977) and Holman's (1991) clearly state that this man, the first oppressors of the Biblical Israelites, was an Ethiopian (Smith's) whose proper name is Cush(Holman). The page should reflect that it is being translated “Cushite (Ethiopian) of double wickedness” 
There has been oppression of actual historical evidence for years in academia, it is time for wikipedia to at least get it right as millions of people rely on this site for information. For the record, y'alls page on the Moors is completely lacking and bias and we have had experiences that if you try to edit in proper information pertaining to the Moors whom are given the derogatory misnomer "black people", then your edits will be deleted under some dubious rules. Time to get it right. Peace.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheik Way-El (talk • contribs) 20:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I find the argument that his name should be translated that way dubious and unconvincing, but most importantly, it seems like novel WP:OR if no cite has ever suggested this translation. BTW If you want to address whoever wrote the Moors article, you may find it more helpful to comment on Talk:Moors, since they are more likely to watch that page than this one!   Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 21:20, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Sheik Way-El -- Arameans in Mesopotamia before 1000 B.C. sounds like a very improbable context in which to find blacks.  In any case, pre-Hellenistic Judeans were only rather vaguely aware of the existence of blacks (as people mainly inhabiting remote regions at the edge of the world), and don't seem to have had any particular emotions about them.  The word "Cushan" otherwise only appears in Habbakuk 3:7, where there's no discernible connection with blacks... AnonMoos (talk) 22:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiding the ethnicity of Chushan (Cush) Rishataim
Talk:Swedish Ingria

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support Is the RM procedure needed here at all? Colchicum (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I listed it as an uncontroversial move but you never know so it's not going to hurt if there is an opportunity to discuss about it at the talk page.--Termer (talk) 13:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Duchy of Estonia (1561–1721)

message: I am unclear on how the simple title "Duchy of Estonia" is ambiguous? Srnec (talk) 04:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: because there has been 2 Duchies of Estonia in history. the first one was the duchy of the Danish Kingdom in the 13-14 century. And the other-one was a dominion of Swedish Empire in the 16-18 cantury.--Termer (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We need an article on the other one. Srnec (talk) 19:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's there , just that it's still called Danish Estonia and would need to be renamed at one point since Duchy of Estonia was the official name of the place at the time--Termer (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

text: OK, renaming at least this article back to descriptive "Swedish Estonia" was not justified. During the Swedish era the country was called "Duchy of Estland" .  And there are sourced that use Latin spelling "Duchy of Estonia" 1561. . Duchy of Estonia, formally formed in 1561 on the basis of Swedish-controlled North Estonia --Termer (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity? 

message: What is the purpose of this unsourced section? It's only a long list of red links, with no proper information. I suggest that it should be removed unless reworked substantially.
Yakikaki (talk) 19:52, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, since there have been no objections I'm removing this section as it seems to fulfil no real purpose. Yakikaki (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military section 

message: The flag is the flag of the Swedish armed forces nothing else. Zzalpha (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So which one was used for this territory during the time period? TylerBurden (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong flag
Talk:Hugh Green (martyr)

message: Is being a martyr and and being made a Saint not notable enough? Talskiddy (talk)
:Not sure if he was actually canonized, rather than beatified,  (so Blessed Hugh Green} as most sources seem to indicate, in any case wikipedia practice seems to not use Saint as  a prefix, so it should probably be moved back.John Z (talk) 22:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion?
Talk:The Begotten

message: I removed the trivia section because it only contained one remark.  It said that Odo remarks on the appearance of pyramids in nature and that this is notable because pyramids do not occur in nature.  This is false.  There are crystals with four and three sided pyramidal structures and there is a whole family of neurons whose cell bodies are roughly pyramidal - the excitatory pyramidal cells.
--152.2.88.26 17:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Willie Brown (footballer, born 1900)

message: The article title says he was born in 1900. So does the info box. The text itself says 1896. The article is undersourced, so someone may need to dig up more sources. If they cannot we may not be able to justify the article at all. 1900 is part of the 19th-century since there is no year 0, so assuming one of the listed birth years is correct he was born in the 19th-century.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year?