Talk:Sabiha Gökçen International Airport

message: ... and how far from istanbul center?
Don't know who asked above but my answer would be: Not sure possible to write travel time now as it would depend on traffic but once M4 metro and Marmaray are connected the travel time should be more predictable.
My guess would be that it is always quicker to reach anywhere on the Asian side from SAW than IST even now. I guess European side quicker from IST at present. I think travel times should be written in the airport articles once the third airport opens. 
Chidgk1 (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: far far away

message: :Image:Sgokcen logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sgokcen logo.gif

message: Cargo Traffic Progress (tonnes):
*2003 : 32.889
*2004 : 38,243
*2005 : 58.205
*2006 : 81,210
*2007 : 98.422
*2008 : 107,564http://www.therouteshop.com/istanbul-sabiha-gokcen-airport/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.110.6.24 (talk) 12:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cargo 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:58, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Sgia--dis.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Guzel fatih DSC06030.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Sabiha Gökçen International Airport's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "airlineroute.net":
From Brussels Airport: http://airlineroute.net/2013/11/26/tk-brutxl-s14/
From Heraklion International Airport: http://airlineroute.net/2013/09/24/a3-s14update1/
From King Abdulaziz International Airport: http://airlineroute.net/2013/12/18/ga-jed-s14/
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Sabiha Gökçen International Airport]] 

message: Some sort of explosion, one cleaner killed. Sources here if it's notable. 
* http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35167328 Turkey Istanbul airport blast kills cleaner
* http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2015/12/23/Explosion-on-plane-at-Istanbul-airport-kills-one/4501450870203/ Explosion on plane at Istanbul airport kills one
* http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/istanbul-airport-explosion-kills-cleaner/news-story/9311766b9d4bdf5b81b16ace2e79edc4. Istanbul airport explosion kills cleaner 
220 of Borg 01:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  23 December 2015 explosion 

message: Does everyone agree with Dobbie's assessment that it is inappropriate to point out that the airport was named to celebrate not simply a female pioneer but one who actively participated in air raids against Kurds? --Webmgr (talk) 22:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after... 

message: Saying this again here since you templated me. A source from AnadoluJet about where AnadoluJet flies is in fact reliable and acceptable for verification, and third-party sources are not necessary to confirm this. Independent sources are needed to establish notability (not an issue here) and in cases where the subject is unreliable like a biography. I would rather verify straight from the horse's mouth than some other article that could be outdated! Moreover, Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports/Archive_17#RfC_about_references_for_the_"Airlines_and_destinations"_tables explitly says that "Timetables that require manual searching (e.g. this one [United Airlines' timetable]) are permitted as references" – sources directly from the airline are acceptable. I have added the searchable timetable https://online.anadolujet.com/timetable?lang=en-US and https://www.anadolujet.com/en/corporate/flight-network, which is more explicit and doesn't even require searching to appropriately verify what is stated in the article. Take it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports if don't think this is adequate, but you'd be going against the practice on virtually every other airport article and make these table unmanageable. Reywas92Talk 16:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you so afraid for independent sources? That timetables or company websites (non-WP:RS sources) are permitted in a five year old discussion, does not make then the preferred option. The Banner talk 19:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not "afraid" of them, it's just obstinate to have stupid pointless tags when the primary source is perfectly reliable and acceptable to verify these simple facts. Independent sources are preferred to avoid the possibilty of original research, unfair portrayal, and NPOV, which are obviously not concerns here. The company website is reliable for such basic uncontestable facts, otherwise bring it up at WP:RSN. Reywas92Talk 20:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not reliable sources conform WP:RS. But you make it look like that even asking for independent sources is already offending. The Banner talk 21:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources