lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cerak

message: Cerak II is not an extension of Cerak into Kosutnjak forest. 
Cerak 2 (oficially named as such in 1985-1987, with street signs, most notably the one next to the roundabout of bus #52 (previously used by #57), consists of streets Vinogradski Venac and Cerski Venac. This part is actually a later addition to Cerak Vinogradi (easily identified by the design), and is not bordering Kosutnjak. 
What might seem as an extension of the original Cerak area, are parts of so called "Filmski grad", that indeed are next to Kosutnjak, and some streets (notably Miloja Zakica, do actually terminate right at the tree line).
: Thanks for the info, I corrected the text and hope I did it right. If you have any new things to add to this article, it would be nice to expand Cerak (you seem to be living in that area). PajaBG 18:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Free Willy 3: The Rescue

message: Bieber is listed as Willy's son?  That doesn't sound right.  I can't find that backed up anywhere and I don't think any of the whales ever had a voice, right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daveshira (talk • contribs) 16:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Justin Bieber

message: Rewrote Article to take a better tone, it was basically copied over from a standard summary of the movie. --PlasticMan 07:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Rewrite 

message: You know, the last names of the Whale poachers in that movie was based on the names of the NHL hockey player who played in the Hartford Whalers; Glen Wesley, Kevin Dineen, Geoff Sanderson and Robert Kron. BattleshipMan (talk) 07:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the Whale poachers on that movie.
Talk:Battle of Mulroy

message: This article was created with text from The Lords of the Isles to which Wikipedia is not legally entitled, lacking proper licensing by the publisher. Some examples of copyright problems include:
, , , , , , , 
I am heartily sorry to say that it seems the article will need to be rewritten to remove any remaining text by this contributor, since he has verified that the publisher did not license its use. I am blanking the article accordingly and listing it at the copyright problems board. I hope that the contributors to this article will be able to help salvage it. (For more information, see CCI.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Isn't Maoile Ruaidh the genitive of Maol Ruadh? 89.171.39.202 (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maol Ruadh or Maoile Ruaidh? 

message: Hi , I note that you have been reverting some of hte recent unsourced and unexplained changes. Feel free to work through any or all of the rest. Also feel free to ping me if you hit any issues. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Engagements on Lake Ontario

message: The anonymous IP 82.28.237.200 (talk) has made repeated assertions to the effect that the entire contest was a "Decisive British Victory", on the grounds that The engagements were a decisive strategic victory for the British, due to their far more powerful vessels on the lake, deterred the American fleet from setting sail. The result of this was that the lake remained in the hands of the British, so the Americans could not launch an invasion of Canada..
In addition to being inaccurate (and apparently written without reading the article), this view of US War Aims belongs in the main article on the War of 1812, where this IP has already made assertions that because the US did not win decisively, they were therefore defeated decisively. No serious history of the War makes any claim that the overall result of the War on Ontario was anything but an expensive draw. Assertions of decisive victories by either side therefore are Original Research and also violate NPOV HLGallon (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do please read the article, or do some research. I have made no assumptions based on a US history department (who are they, by the way?). For your information, I am British. Your puerile claim that "...because the Americans could not set sail, and thus control the lake so no force could launch an invasion of Canada" does not stand up. In 1813, the Americans launched three invasions of Canada, although one of these (the attack on York) was little more than a raid. For late 1813 and from July to October in 1814, it was the British who could not set sail, but the Americans did not take advantage of this due to Chauncey's intransigence. The British did finish the year with a triumphant game-winning volley by putting the St. Lawrence into service, but since winter soon set in and the war ended, this was a rather empty "victory". I regard your assertions to the contrary as both OR and POV. If you have any reputable source to back them up, please quote them. HLGallon (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated POV assertions by anon IP. 
Talk:Round Earth Theatre Company

message: Some of the history could be more apt in Richard Davey, while some needs rigorous editing, and further again could be in a section about Davey et al and their ideas. User:SatuSuro 07:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 17:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: The actual style of the article is a problem. The  notability of the subject is high in a Western Tasmania context, the importance in a Tasmanian context is high.  Therefore I am removing the deletion noitce and will improve the style and create many links within the five days SatuSuro 00:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion notice

message: Hey all, I've improved the language and removed the copy-edit tag, but have added unreferenced and jargon tags because, well, it's unreferenced, and there is some jargon that the average reader may not understand, especially in the last few sections.-Samuel Tan (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-edit: June 2008
Talk:Battle of Mauchline Muir

message: This article claimed the battle was near Loudoun Hill (map). However Scottish Places, a .gov.uk website, gives it as happening aty Mauchline (map), which is probably 30 or so miles away. I've changed the text to Mauchline and removed references to Loudoun Hill. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:49, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Loudoun Hill

message: The battle would have been fought on the moorland a number of miles to the east of Mauchline so the original location of Loudon hill may not have been wrong.
If you look on google earth you can see the expanse of the moorland so the battle may have been somewhere in between Mauchline and Loudon hill. — Neil Ritchie (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Cumaean Sibyl

message: "It was said in some of the ancient poems that the whispers of the Sibyl would be heard for a thousand years, and some have said that they will resound and echo for all eternity." Even if this editor had known that she was referring obliquely to a famous fragment of Heraclitus, this kind of empty effusion, however heartfelt, just isn't for an encyclopedia. --Wetman 07:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Iqbal Ahmed

message: Simplysavvy (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

message: To any future category-deleters:
I would like to see a deletion request for British-Asians, and I would like to see how far you can go with that before you delete British-Bengalis. They are essentially the same kind of debate, except British-Bengalis is smaller. You are picking on a small category and deleting it. I would like for you to be consistent, i.e. I would like to see you pick on a larger category and carry that vote first. Thank you very much. --Peripatetic 07:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Worek Plan

message: Operation Worek would be a better title phonetically in English. To brzmi lepiej. Consider changing it, and the sooner the better. It reads awkwardly (plan worek or plan bag/sack), and has a stupid sounding quality to it. Dr. Dan 22:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought there was some debate about 'plan' vs 'operation' some time ago about the Peking Plan, but I can't find it. I prefer operation too, so if there are no objection you can move both of them in a few days, I think.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good because it just doesn't cut it in English, as it stands. I thought only administrators can change the main titles. While I'm at it, am I right that a regular contributor cannot add to a category like "Failed Assasins" or "Cities in XXX". Hitting the edit page does not allow an editor to make changes or additions. Not in my attempts to so so anyway. Dr. Dan 22:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anybody can move articles, unless there is a redirect with the same name, that requires administrator to delete the redirect (which action in some cases can leads to accusations that one is abusing admin power... :>). As for categories, normal users can create them to, although nobody, even admins, cannot move them (some software issue, I think, more details at WP:CFD). However you don't add articles to the category by editing it (you can add descriptions and such), you add categories to the articles themselves. Does it answer your querry?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, quite well. But am I correct that one cannot change the main title of an article through the edit this page feature? Dr. Dan 03:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, nobody can do it. All users who have been registered for a few days can use the move option, though.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Operation Worek
Talk:Harold Keith Johnson

message: It seems strange for an introductory paragraph to jump right in and focus on the particulars of a general's views on the strategy of the Vietnam war. I think it would be more helpful to give a brief biopic and insert the Vietnam info later. If it's really the major feature of this career, it could still go in the top section, otherwise it could go under a "Vietnam Years" heading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeblyth (talk • contribs) 14:34, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange intro paragraph
Talk:Beretta 92SB

message: This (and other Beretta 92 variants) should never have been a separate page (from Beretta 92) as it is only a variant of the 92 that should be covered in a "variants" section as is the standard for all firearm/weapon pages.
See Wikipedia:Merging and moving pages for guidelines guidelines
:There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept in the universe. For example, "Flammable" and "Non-flammable" can both be explained in an article on Flammability.   
Deon Steyn 08:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Trevor Francis

message: Why is there no mention of the reference to Francis in the closing credits song of 'Only Fools and Horses?'
http://www.culttelly.co.uk/lyrics/ofah.html  Grandma Roses (talk) 12:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no mention? 
Talk:Paul Jewell

message: I have split up some of this article to make it easier to read, and I have also added the 'Controversy' section to the page to cover the Jewell-Dowd spat. Renegade MUFC 17:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Event planning

message: There was a recent AfD discussion on Event planning and production where it as noted that it was redundant to this one and should be merged here. Please look at the it's version before turning into a redirect for anything to merge here. Thanks - Nabla (talk) 00:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Event planning and production 

message: Perhaps it would be of use to create a Trends section which could link to magazine articles from Event Solutions, which tends to publish articles written by members of the event industry on a variety of topics. 
For example, this article which discusses using LED lighting and using soft goods to alter the look and feel of an ordinary meeting space. I don't know if these sorts of things are acceptable though. This is an honest attempt to make this a better article. I know there are other sources which would also help to fill out a section like this. Eventsolutions (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Trends Section 

message: This is an important subject and maybe could use a revamp? If people have ideas about how to improve this article, what to add, and so forth, please write something here. Generally when I do a revamp I keep the existing information as much as possible (sometimes moving it around, or copyediting it) but mostly focus on expanding the article with more referenced content, photos, layout and so forth. And I try to get feedback first after I work on a draft, and get views, before swapping it in. If people have thoughts about how to pursue this, please write something here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considering a revamp of this article
Talk:The Women of Brewster Place (novel)

message: Here is a selected bibliography of secondary sources for this novel --DrX (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography for further reference 

message: Redirect needed: Women of Brewster Place. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:05, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect needed 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lillyroehrig (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors African American Literature II
Talk:Selig Polyscope Company

message: I removed the Chicago, Illinois header, as it was erroneous. The text that was beneath it, discussing the lease to William Fox, and subsequent use by Garson and Neilan refers to the Edendale studio, not Chicago. (Note that I have seen that same mistake elsewhere on the Internet - may have been answer.com. It's definitely wrong.) --TomChatt 08:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2006

message: I can find no mention at the studio's attempt at newsreels, the Selig-Tribune, in cooperation with the Chicago Tribune.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maclilus (talk • contribs) 17:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selig-Tribune
Talk:National Parliament (East Timor)

message: The article "National Parliament of East Timor"  needs to be updated, especially the last paragraph.
:In what respect? Rebecca 08:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article "National Parliament of East Timor"  needs to be updated 

message: I changed the reported voting system from parallel/proportional to proportional. It is specified in the constitution as proportional, and it is specified in the election law of 2006 as proportional. I cannot locate any mention of it being parallel. In fact, I was able to replicate the seat count using the d'Hondt method (as described in the constitution and election law).
If there is a reliable source that specifies the system includes a parallel component, please replace what I did.
Thanks! Svyatoslav (talk) 20:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting system change 

message: Need to fix seat allocation figure to reflect new composition of parliament as of 2018.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.30.115.34 (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

message: Hi, not a native english speaker here, so sorry if I am unclear in anyway, let me know i'll try to be clearer in my explanations.
I decided to do little review of all states legislatures which have not pass a NPVIC act yet and I came along a few problems:
First of all, I was unable to reach legislatures in Louisiana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio and Wisconsin, and even sources already on this page sent me to web pages saying the link do not works, so, don't know if it is because my IP is outside the US or if the sites are really down, No information from me on those state.
More importantly, I've come across 2 bills in Missouri dated from 2023, they don't seem to have been rejected or anything, but I don't know if it has been indefinitely postponed or if it is still pending (https://house.mo.gov/Bill.aspx?bill=HB997&year=2023&code=R and https://house.mo.gov/Bill.aspx?bill=HB829&year=2023&code=R)
For the rest, I'll just update the page with the infos I've collected Niivlem (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Missouri bills were listed in this article previously.  They were changed to "died in committee" in , then removed as failed in .  I don't know enough to verify these edits, and the bills appear to be in the current session for the Missouri legislature. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick review of all states and problem with Missouri 

message: I'm curious if this case will have any impact on the NPVIC. While in particular it has to do with eligibility for candidates to be placed on the ballot, I'm under the impression that the ruling also influences how state electors should act in some way. Just had this thought in the back of my head. Indochina2 (talk) 11:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump v. Anderson's Impact on NPVIC 

message: Bush didn’t win Florida as stated. Bush was awarded Florida by the Supreme Court. Recounts gave it Gore 73.159.217.224 (talk) 02:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's complicated, but it's unfair to say that recounts gave it to Gore, only that recounts *could* have done that were they not halted. 2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida is a helluva read. TheSavageNorwegian 04:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida 

message: Hey, me again, so, long story short, some user recently changer the status of the Wisconsin bills, claiming that since April 15, they died in comittee.
The thing is, as I previously stated, Wisconsin is one of the 5 legislatures websites I cannot access (don't know why), and as I was searching for secondary sources, I came across an article of the Harvard Political Review, April 19, claiming that bill are still pending in Wisconsin (https://harvardpolitics.com/abolishing-the-electoral-college-might-not-be-as-hard-as-you-think/)
So could anyone who has access to the Winsconsin legislature website look for the bills status and either come back here to tell me it has indeed died in comittee or not, or directly change the info on the main page? Thank you very much Niivlem (talk) 22:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Wisconsin
Talk:Symbolic integration

message: A lot of the information in this article is covered in antiderivative. I think it should either be merged or atleast cleaned up, as the current article is not in formal encyclopedic tone and has some grammatical errors. RyanC. 08:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

message: :(We say usually because, while the lion's share of functions of a single variable can be broken down into combinations of approximately twenty standard forms, there are functions with non-numeric exponents--x to the x power, say--that must be attacked via the implicit differentiation approach that is not necessarily straightforward to perform by digital computer.)
This is too long and detailed.  Just say usually.  RJFJR 17:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article space

message: At the moment, the coverage of symbolic integration in Integral is more extensive, even though that article designates Symbolic integration as the 'main article' and links here. Arcfrk 17:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, for some reason this article covers only finding an antiderivative. Symbolic integration also covers definite integration, which may or may not involve finding an antiderivative. 140.177.205.222 (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello.  This situation has not evolved a bit.  This article now includes material for definite integrals i.e. solutions based on special functions.TonyMath (talk) 21:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disparity in coverage 

message: Twice I have witnessed people claim this method of symbolic integration was pioneered by computer algebra systems other than Maple.  Developers of the Maple system showed the method at a high profile conference at MIT as indicated in the reference.  Anyone claiming that this method was invented by another system should provide proof with an earlier reference. TonyMath (talk) 23:14, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Vandalization" is not an acceptable term. This being said, I apologize for a confusion between definite and indefinite integration. This confusion was probably caused by the fact that the paragraph devoted to Risch was too short for a due weight, although it was mentioned twice in the paragraph on definite integration. I hope I have correctly corrected all of this by my recent edit. D.Lazard (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am satisfied with the most recent version and hope all is clarified for everyone.  The method of symbolic integration based on the exploitation of special functions has nothing to do with the Risch algorithm, though I have pondered about a hybrid algorithm.TonyMath (talk) 04:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalization of credit for symbolic integration based on special functions

message: The SAINT(Symbolic Automatic INTegrator) program developed by James Slagle and Marvin Minsky was the first expert system that is a heuristic program for solving symbolic integration problems. Is it relevant to mention it as part of the history of symbolic integration in computer science? Alacris (talk) 14:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should SAINT(Symbolic Automatic INTegrator) program be mentioned here?
Talk:Metallothionein

message: 500 Da ~ 5 aa seems a little too small...
the german wiki states 3,5kDa to 14kDa   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.149.151.140 (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Molecular weight

message: I believe there should be a PDB image file for a typical metallothionein domain listed. I will work on finding one that is of suitable copyright. Whiteknight521 (talk) 08:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: PDB Image

message: Why is this page in the enzyme category? MTs don't have enzymatic activity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuburbDrip (talk • contribs) 01:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Enzymes