Talk:WWE Heat

message: That's precisely why it's relevant; Styles' work-shoot promo on RAW made that fact more in the spotlight. Also, it's been two weeks in a row now that he's hosted solo. I think it at least deserves a mention because he's the only one on the list by himself. That in itself deserves some sort of context.
I'll make you a deal; if he's still hosting by himself at the end of June, let's say, I think it would be relevant enough to not arbitrarily take down. Besides, if you're arguing nobody will care, we're talking about HEAT. It's not like it is a huge deal anyway.
Nightcrawlerdcl 1:14, 13 May 2006
:isn't "However, Coachman's announce partner Grisham would take Coachman's color commentator role to allow Styles to do play-by-play but Styles would also become unavailable meaning Grisham would run the show alone." good enough its to the point and it is stating everything that needs to be said --- Paulley 12:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well lets see because Grisham hosted it once on his own... the only reason there is mention of it cus WWE ECW-style brand is comming into existance if it wasnt for that you wouldnt have even thought about it and in about 3 months time no one will remeber or care --- Paulley 10:14, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Sunday Night''  Heat 

message: Can the person who stated in the article that "a new logo has been introduced with the difference being the letters are different color" stop writing that as the logo is the same however WWE.com has many differences for it. ---Belevsquad 08:41, 17 February 2007 (U
-----------------------------------------
Whens Heat on TV?
Its not shown on TV anymore. It was on the weekends. The WWE was not drawing enough ratings to keep it running.Jonathanmbarnes (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: any word on heat coming back since the whole ecw/raw merge got cancelled? KP317 20:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: coming back

message: Since Halftime Heat is coming back should Halftime Heat have a different article or remain part of this article? --HC7 19:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that links it to this show? Anything that says it is it will be episode 514? Or is it a different linage that shares the name similar to WWE Superstars. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 19:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Remain here. I liken this to Starrcade (2018), which stupidly still has its own article. --JDC808 ♫ 00:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what source? WWE has uploaded it to the "WWE Network Exclusive" category, not the "WWE Heat" category. Including it on this page is WP:OR. Your Starrcade analogy defends not breaking it out from the main Halftime Heat article. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 18:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Misread that this was the talk page for the WWE Heat article (had followed a link to this post), though point still stands but for the parent Halftime Heat article (as in, yesterday's special does not need its own article). --JDC808 ♫ 23:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree with that. Definitely a not needed fork. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 13:51, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halftime Heat