Talk:Gilmore Girls/Archive 1

message: This paragraph is clearly advertising copy pasted in from elsewhere. I'll delete it unless complaints appear
===Style of dialogue=== 
shouldn't there be a paragraph added (maybe under cult ref.) to include the rather unique style of dialogue, which sounds scripted, but still natural to lorelei and rory..rahter unique in a tv series i think 80.126.28.140 12:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: shouldn't there be a paragraph added (maybe under cult ref.) to include the rather unique style of dialogue, which sounds scripted, but still natural to lorelei and rory..rahter unique in a tv series i think 80.126.28.140 12:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style of dialogue

message: Why is "teenage mother at the age of 16" linked in the Overview section?  This doesn't seem like something that will ever get a Wiki article written about it ... a little to specific don't you think?--Talia 00:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilinks? 

message: I encountered this Pilot (Gilmore Girl episode) article. Nothing links to that page. Is there something in there which could be saved or should it be just put up for deletion? I am not a fan of the series, so don't know much about it. Garion96 (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The pilot episode already has a stub article, Gilmore Girls (television pilot), which is linked into the List of Gilmore Girls episodes referenced by the main article. However, this other stub is actually longer (and older) than the old one. I've added merge tags to both and add a category, a stub tag, and a link to this article to Garion's cited article to start the process of combining them. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Pilot (Gilmore Girl episode) is not very well written, although it is longer than Gilmore Girls (television pilot).  My suggestion would be to pull a few usable facts from Pilot (Gilmore Girl episode) and then delete it. --Jeremy Butler 12:18, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilot episode wikipedia article 

message: *Is Sookie and Jackson's last name Mellville or Belleville.  When one of them says it, it sounds like "Mellevill" but in a scene where they're at church the sign outside says "belleville..."  Does anyone know?Kiwidude 03:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Belleville or Melville? 

message: I don't know how best to annotate GG's cultural references, but perhaps using Wikiquote's GG page would be the best place to start. --Jeremy Butler 12:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references 

message: I seem to be having an edit-summary argument with two anonymous users over the way Paris Geller and Kirk Gleason are presented in the main cast section. Just to make my position clear, I am supporting the apparent practice here of citing the seasons that each character's portraying actor is shown in the opening credits. By this standard, it's my understanding that Liza Weil was "promoted" as of season 2, and Sean Gunn as of season 3, although I have not verified this myself. An alternative explanation may be how these characters/actors are cited in IMDb, which Wikipedia considers a reliable source. (Weil is shown from 2001 on, and Gunn from 2002 on, at least roughly corresponding to the aforementioned seasons.) This is why each of them (and others) have the phrase "recurring previously" after their main-character season numbers. I did not introduce this practice; I'm merely correcting attempts to selectively change it for Paris and Kirk.
I invite anyone wishing to insist that Paris and Kirk were main characters from the beginning to cite their source. If you can't, you shouldn't make this change. Alternatively, editors may decide to change how these "promoted" characters are listed, but this should be done consistently if at all, and should be discussed here first. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the german Warner Bros homepage the appearance of Paris in the first season is a "wiederkehrende Rolle", what quite simply means "recurring character". --Adornix 23:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it's been awhile on this topic, but Weil was under 'guest star' status from season one (see the Paris Geller article for more info) because she originally auditioned for the Rory role, and then was offered her own character as ASP liked her enough to create the Paris role especially for her. She became a contract regular in S2 (as was Sean in S3), and she has been that way since, though from S2-S5, both Sean and Liza would not appear in the credits if their respective characters had no appearance in the episode about to air. Nate 01:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris and Kirk in main cast 

message: Lauren* created an article about Luke's Diner. However, this is clearly not notable outside of the show, and a redirect should come from Luke's Diner. However, information between that article should be merged into this one, if necessary. As I have never seen an episode of the show in my life (*gasps*), I would appreciate it if a user more familiar with the subject do the merging. --Andy Saunders 04:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One requires AfD, where I think the prevailing consensus would be to merge anyway, the other does not. -- Andy Saunders 04:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luke's Diner 

message: This article (I just read it) should definitely be merged, if not deleted. I like Gilmore Girls, but that stub of an article isn't even entirely about the diner! It's more about Luke- it gives a few details of plot that revolve around the character played by Scott Patterson, and mentions the diner a few times. I agree with the comment about ti being just like having an article called "Lorelai's House". It's ridiculous! Emily 23:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, if someone familiar with the show wants to do the merging, we can redirect Luke's Diner into here. --Andy Saunders 02:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I handled this merge by (1) adding info about Luke to the start of this article and (2) redirecting Luke's Diner to the main article on Luke Danes. This way, all the Luke references are kept together. Plus, I didn't see how much more Luke info would fit in the main GG article since there's no place for details on supporting characters. But if someone sees a better way... --Jeremy Butler 12:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luke's Diner 

message: I suppose a few quotations are okay, but, really, that's what Wikiquote (already linked to) is for. --Jeremy Butler 13:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotations 

message: I'm thinking about putting together a page with a paragraph or two about each of the minor recurring characters (such as Taylor or Madeline). Does this seem worthy of it's own page, or should the list of characters here just be expanded, or are we good with what's up now. Also, should Jackson and Christopher be added to the character template? Deafgeek 12:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recurring Characters 

message: The character list needs clean up. There's way too many entries on it right now. More minor characters can be placed in a supporting article along with guest stars. --Jtalledo (talk) 13:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list 

message: I'm going to need to get some more solid back-up for this claim, but I'm putting this out there while I begin my search just incase anyone already has it.  I remember once seeing a brown box instead of the pink one for season 5 for another region with an entirely different design, which would contradict the line that states the cover art has been the same for all regions so far.  I'm going to go attempt to find it, but I wanted to bring it up just in case anyone knows of or recalls a similar fact. --Jordy540 21:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Art 

message: I'm a little confused, the article says the show aired on the WB and will be moved to the CW, but later it says it airs exclusively on ABC Family.  Clear this up please? DoomsDay349 22:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ABC Family Channel has exclusive rights to the syndicated broadcast of the show. I've tried to clarify this in the original article. --Jeremy Butler 11:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. DoomsDay349 16:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 

message: I think the sectioned off quotes from the show are unnecessary and a little obnoxious.
"Rory: You went alphabetically. Lane: Seemed tidy."
A special sectioned off quote from the show about how Lane organized her list of music influences seems a bit too much for the music section.  This illustrates more of lane's thoroughness than anything else.
"Luke: Coffee?  Lorelai: You have to ask?"
Do we really need this quote?  The section already says they're coffee addicts, and this isn't a very memorable quote or anything, its pretty much just restating what was just said.
24.125.29.161 19:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes unnecessary? 

message: Is Gilmore Girls a soap opera?  It seems to be a dramady to me, but I have heard others who say it's a soap.  What's the final word on this?
Seeing as how no one's evil twin has stolen their father or married their brother, I'd say dramady. DoomsDay349 00:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soap Opera? 

message: I was surprised to see no links to the episode list, etc.  I couldn't find any discussion of this above, so I'm adding a See also section.  —johndburger 00:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: The official home page of the Gilmore Girls was outdated, pointing to the old WB site, which went up to season 5. The link now points to the new official CW site for Gilmore Girls. --212.71.37.100 16:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Homepage 

message: I think the plot summary is getting too long for this article.  I'd suggest it be moved to the List of Gilmore Girls episodes. --Jeremy Butler 13:25, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the plot summary 

message: Somebody has nominated several of your episode pages for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/French_Twist_%28Gilmore_Girls%29) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 00:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode pages AfD 

message: :Image:Gilmore-s7.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why was the season 7 DVD image deleted? I don't see any difference between that one and other DVD release images...it still falls under fair use. Can we put it back, or will it just keep getting deleted? Shifuimam 23:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Gilmore-s7.jpg

message: Although it may be redundant to have dates in both the infobox and introduction, I think it should be mentioned in both because upon reading the lead sentence, it is not clear that the show is cancelled (one possible reason why people keep trying to say Gilmore Girls was instead of is). The WikiProject Television guidelines do allow this information to be included in the introduction. JYi 18:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioning dates and cancellation in lead paragraph 

message: Should Lane's husband be on the list? He's been in more recent episodes.
-Zach, you mean? He definetely should be. He's on just as often as other people on that list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.189.130.131 (talk) 01:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well, Zach is a major character --Banime (talk) 20:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reoccuring Characters 

message: Is there anyway to inform readers that this page contains spoilers. These spoilers are things like what happens at the seventh season. This hasn't come out yet it places like Australia and people that read this article are unaware of the info it contains. Is there a way to fix this?----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heytaytay99 (talk • contribs) 11:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 

message: Added refimprove, rewrite and copy editing.
The "Plot" section needs to be completely rewritten. It is currently made up of huge blocks of text with grammar errors on every sentence, and not a poor comma in sight to help you through a sentence with 50+ words. The production section is only slightly better, be needs a lot more references.
Ruyter (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates (May 11th)

message: Today I saw a commerical on ABC Family that stated there would be a new season of Gilmore Girls, premiering on the 8th of June. My information is valid and other people have seen it as well.
This is very important information that should be posted here. So that Fans can believe it. 71.58.107.112 (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So now reading the text is pretty much like watching the show itself?134.7.248.130 (talk) 11:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mate, the first paragraph warns about the endless run on sentences.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.7.248.130 (talk) 11:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Season

message: While Sean Gunn is known for his outrageous character "Kirk" on Gilmore Girls, his first appearance on the show was acting as a DSL man ,sent by Emily Gilmore, going by the name of Mick.
::Yeah that's right, in the first or second episode he is called 'Mick', I remembered that puzzled me too. Maybe it was only for the pilot and his role was rewritten later.84.196.48.46 (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Appearance of Sean Gunn 

message: I took this out of the Luke/Lorelai section:
"At one point Lorelai and Luke come home drunk and have sex. Lorelai later realizes she may be pregnant, but it is a false alarm."
Although I admit I haven't seen the show in quite a while, I'm pretty sure this would have stuck out in my mind. 97.96.182.234 (talk) 00:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Though it sounds rather tawdry the way it was phrased there, it's quite genuine. It happens near the end of the fifth series, coming at the same time as Sookie's baby. David Arthur (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: I've changed the countries in this article, section: dvd-release. I've changed the UK and Norway into Europe UK, and Europe Norway (since they both are part of Europe). Europe itself is changed into Continental Europe (every country in Europe, excluding the UK and Ireland (and depending on your point of view it could also exclude Scandinavia, Iceland and Finland). I wanted to set this straight, because with almost everything it seems that some people in the UK consider themselves as something else, other than European (when in fact they are very much so). Second of all: should Norway be excluded in the list of dvd-releases? I included the Netherlands in the section of season 6 (since in the Netherlands this season came out on a different date than in the UK, Continental Europe or Norway). But I have my doubts about that; what if every country on this planet will be represented in this list? Perhaps the releasedates of Norway (and the Netherlands) can be added in the section of Continental Europe?--84.104.123.100 15:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I recently fixed some bad markup in the DVD releases section. However, I did notice that with the addition of the Netherlands to the release dates for seasons 6 and 7 and the complete show box set release, the table rows for those DVD sets are too wide - anyone running a lower resolution than 1280x1024 is going to probably have to scroll sideways to read those. Would anyone be against it if I moved the country icon and country name under the "Europe" heading on the release dates sections to take up less horizontal space? Shifuimam 07:51, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's the same thing that I proposed (see #6 on this talkpage), but note that the Netherlands has a different releasedate than the UK and Norway. I would like to see that the several releasedates in Europe (UK, Norway, Netherlands, etc.) are all combined in one section (Europe). Would that be possible? I think that would solve the problem. --Robster1983 10:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: P.s. I put my proposal in this section, for it is about the same thing; the DVD-section in the article. --Robster1983 10:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the aspect ratios listed correct? I don't know about the DVDs but E4 have the 5th season onwards in 16:9 widescreen, so I think it would be unlikely at least the PAL DVDs are different to this. --13:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up DVD releases section 

message: Could someone please research and find out why Edward Herrmann continues to be listed as a "Guest Star"?!?! 'Emily' is not so why is he!?!? This has been driving me crazy since I noticed it about four seasons ago! Might be a good tidbit for a "Trivia" section :) 204.49.209.110 12:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe on one of the DVD specials, or somewhere they said they were lucky to get Edward Herrman. I think that part of the stipulation of him agreeing to be on the show is to be listed as "Special appearance by." It happens in a lot of movies and such where they will list a load of actors and then one special one (on The King of Queens for instance, they list all the actors and then at the end list "And Jerry Stiller as Arthur." I think it's a weird thing of contracts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.17.34.222 (talk) 00:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, Richard does appear alot, so your point is understood, but I think there's a line between so many episodes to be considered a "star" and then considered a "recurring character". But, he does have a slot on the opening credits, so I guess that's all we can ask for Fanfiction.addiction 06:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Edward Herrman is not listed as a guest star.  HagermanBot is correct in that it is a contractual thing that he is listed differently than the others.  He was still a regular.  From what I can tell these special titles like this are usually awarded actors that are slightly higher profile than the other cast members but not necessarily the main star of the show such as the Jerry Stiller example above.  --Samuronin (talk) 03:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Gilmore 

message: You waste a LONG graf right at the beginning talking about a spinoff?????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.217.157.164 (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Extravagant Detours

message: I've made a few changes to the page now, editing and rearranging things for clarity, then adding and rewriting some things: I hope nothing's too bold, but I'm inclined to agree with the tag suggesting a lot could be rewritten.  For instance, pages for shows like How I Met Your Mother and One Tree Hill have brief outlines of each season's plot arcs, and I think this could be managed here.  It would also serve to balance the current emphasis on the two leads' love-lives: there's loads more to the show than their romantic liasions, isn't there?  The mother daughter relationships - including Lane and Mrs Kim - run throughout the season; the coming-of-age plot for Rory, including the feuding/friendship arc with Paris, her adjustment at Yale and its ups and downs; Lorelai's business trials and tribulations etc.  Some of what I've added has been along these lines, chiefly to start to represent the series as the well-rounded one about family, ambition and finding a path in life, as well as the ongoing love-stories.  I'd like to hear your opinions, and I propose someone could make a start on this, or I can in a little while --LadderCrime (talk) 11:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: In the second episode of the first season (perhaps first or third, but definetely one of those) Lorelai complains about putting her contacts in backwards to Sookie.
But in a later season, when she is talking to Rachel (Luke's ex-girlfriend), Rachel says she has pretty eyes, and asks if Lorelai wears contacts. Lorelai says No.
She is also wearing glasses sometimes, but not always. (Which could be that she just doesn't have anything half the time, but maybe not)
This has bothered me for actually at least a year so I would really like to know the deal..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.189.130.131 (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was just her not bothering to put in her contacts that day. --Banime (talk) 20:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lorelai wears contacts or not? 

message: I'm quite new to the Gilmore Girls but am confused as to why Rory ended up going to Yale when her ambition was to go to Harvard  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.14.176 (talk) 23:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Stated in the article here: "After much deliberation and with her mother's blessing, Rory ultimately decides to go to Yale (her grandfather's alma mater) instead of Harvard, even though she is accepted into both institutions as well as Princeton University in New Jersey." Rory made a list and the advantages of going to Yale outweighed the advantages going to Harvard. Also note that this is a forum about how to improve the article, not for general discussion of the show. --Jtalledo (talk) 02:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilmore Girls 

message: Thanks to Family Guy, I thought this show was about an older lipstick lesbian dating a younger lipstick lesbian. There's an episode of Family Guy that shows the two main characters kissing each other passionately.
Anyways, I know it's not a show about lesbians now, after watching a few episodes on ABC Family. But hey, Family Guy's naughty joke got me watching. Coffee5binky (talk) 04:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is invaluable information that will inevitably improve the quality and detail of the article overall... *facepalm* Dylan (talk) 10:30, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another reason to detest Family Guy. ◦◦derekbd◦◦my talk◦◦ 03:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Guy 

message: This cast box seems either a) inaccurate or b) confusing. For example, Paris and Dean didn't appear all of the seasons that are "blacked out". Either I'm reading the chart incorrectly or there has been some vandalism. This show has such devoted fans, I'm surprised to find such a glaring mistake. Newjerseyliz (talk) 13:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional main cast 

message: i've found an interesting goof.in 1st episode Lorelai tells that Rory is 16.in ep. 4"deer hunters" Rory drives the car so she is really 16. in episode 6 she seebrares her...16th year!!!(i've counted candles).
why have i written this?because i can't sleep !!!aand those who read this won't seep too!
I am evil genious!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MadMoovz (talk • contribs) 01:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rory's age goof

message: I don't know if they really hated each other but I remember watching the show and I rarely saw Lane & Paris in one scene together. They are both Rory's best friends yet they barely know each other? The only scene where I saw all three of them together was in the last season. Paris and Lane really didn't get along well. Should this be mentioned in the "Rory's friends" section? I think it would be great. Masterpeace3 (talk) 09:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rory's friends: Lane and Paris hate each other. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gilmore Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070514164816/http://www.broadcastingcable.com:80/article/CA6438988.html to http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6438988.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071012043828/http://www.gilmoregirlsnews.com:80/2007/05/23/gilmore-girls-may-get-2-hour-movie/ to http://www.gilmoregirlsnews.com/2007/05/23/gilmore-girls-may-get-2-hour-movie/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070519102605/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000937471 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000937471
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Mostly plot currently and certainly not in keeping with WP:WAF. Izno (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Stars Hollow]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Gilmore Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for //www.abcmedianet.com/Web/progcal/dispDNR.aspx?id=060204_12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the section about the cancellation and change of network, there is a long quote praising the cast, etc.  Is this appropriate?  I believe that it should be paraphrased into just the neutral facts.—Anne Delong (talk) 18:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of network section 

message: Hello, I just had a few suggestions. I think that the page is great overall, but the section on revivals is a bit lengthy and redundant, could probably be shortened a bit. Also, I think including a section on some of the famous quotes and sayings from the show would make it even better! TheGerkinator94 (talk) 19:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If the sayings really are "famous", each one would need a couple of references showing that journalists or TV critics have talked about it.—Anne Delong (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: If we are going to put Edward Herrmann in the series regular category, he should at least have a note, considering that he is billed as a guest star. Or we should just put him in the recurring section, since he is technically a guest star.--Joef1234 (talk) 20:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he is considered a main cast member regardless of the "special appearance by" credit, as he is featured and credited along with the main cast members in the opening title sequence. He is not a guest star nor recurring, as he is credited in every single episode even if he is absent. He qualifies as being apart of the main cast. MSMRHurricane (talk) 02:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Edward Herrmann

message: Prior to the new series revival on Netflix, the show was not known as Gilmore Girls: A year in the life. I think that the new "season" should be treated as a new show. Although it is a direct continuation of the original show story-wise, in terms of production it's not. As an example, the articles for Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z are not merged even though "Z" is a direct continuation of the original, just like this show.--MexTDT (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also known as Gilmore Girls: A year in the life? 

message: Let's not start climbing the Reichstag over whether the Gilmore Girls is or was a TV Series. Both versions are used on Wikipedia and both are correct, depending on your point of view. -Duribald (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So if it was a TV show, what is it now? Does it still exist?-80.146.191.157 (talk) 16:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Is/Was

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life#Separation from Gilmore Girls.  Alex|The|Whovian? 02:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life#Separation from Gilmore Girls]]

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gilmore Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120152851/http://www9.georgetown.edu:80/faculty/tannend/catchthat.html to http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/tannend/catchthat.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070512065915/http://www.zap2it.com:80/tv/news/zap-gilmoregirlscancellation,0,4190185.story?coll=zap-news-headlines to http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-gilmoregirlscancellation,0,4190185.story?coll=zap-news-headlines
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140928181449/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms22A.htm to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms22A.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: John, Loeba, MyNameIsASDF; Hi all, let's discuss this dispute over the character table. I personally find it unnecessary for the descriptions to be present, as each of the main characters all have in-depth descriptions on their separate pages. It adds nothing to the table, and makes it look messy (in my opinion). Also, I feel the order should be by appearance, not status, therefore Sean Gunn should be listed before Milo Ventimiglia as Gunn appeared in the first season while Ventimiglia appeared in the second season, despite Ventimiglia being apart of the main cast in the second season and Gunn being recurring for the first two seasons. Let's not get into an edit war and resolve this issue before it gets out of hand. Cheers! MSMRHurricane (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's nonsensical to say that we don't need descriptions just because there is a character page - this is the parent article for all things GG, so everything should be summarised. The descriptions on the character page are huge and most people won't need a full bio, just an idea of who the character is. I also suspect this isn't the main concern because both of you left the character descriptions for the recurring cast - it's clearly because the descriptions are within the table, that's the issue. I think the table is useful as well because there were multiple changes to the main cast, but the descriptions are definitely more important...So I'll move the table to the character article and leave the character descriptions as a bullet list (like the recurring list). I think it's a shame but there we go. I don't feel that strongly about the Gunn/Ventimiglia thing, I thought it made more sense to go by addition to the main cast but it's really inconsequential so we can do it that order if you feel strongly. --Loeba (talk) 22:06, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Loeba; Personally, short descriptions are no problem to me, I just found them to be overused by putting them in the table, as it was perfectly fine the it was. I think the bullet points with a quick description is better, much better, and moving the table to the characters page is also better. Mostly, it was just have the descriptions within the table that made it look messy and overused. However, I'm happy with the layout at this point. Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 22:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The character table 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Gilmore Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/tannend/catchthat.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-gilmoregirlscancellation,0,4190185.story?coll=zap-news-headlines
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/01/exclusive-qa-la.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170221020719/http://awardsandwinners.com/category/teen-choice-awards/2005/ to http://awardsandwinners.com/category/teen-choice-awards/2005/
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6SM07jSoK?url=http://awardsandwinners.com/category/teen-choice-awards/2006/ to http://awardsandwinners.com/category/teen-choice-awards/2006/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170805221738/https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20150908/williamsburg/gilmore-girls-creators-crash-shows-trivia-night-brooklyn to https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20150908/williamsburg/gilmore-girls-creators-crash-shows-trivia-night-brooklyn
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What does AYITL mean???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:37FE:32E0:FDDF:C108:BECE:E63A (talk) 02:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A year in the life.(Mobile mundo (talk) 22:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: AYITL

message: I have seen both - and – to show how many seasons a character has been in the show. Which is correct? Mobile mundo (talk) 22:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast and characters seasons 

message: There should be a section in this article about Gilmore Girl plot holes. For example, when Jess arrives to Stars Hollow, Luke says his father ran out on him two years ago, but in a later episode says his father left to get diapers for Jess and never returned. I have found some more here http://www.moviemistakes.com/tv3573 
There are also certain characters who return as someone else, e.g. Gran (Marion Ross) returns as cousin Marilyn in the fourth and fifth seasons 
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005385/ 
Graziana (talk) 15:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. This sounds interesting, but it seems like it falls under WP:MOSTV#Things to avoid, namely continuity errors/goofs. The second thing is noted in List of Gilmore Girls characters. --Jtalledo (talk) 21:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot holes and returning characters 

message: According to IMDb, Gilmore Girls was released in both 4:3 and 16:9 formats. The Gilmore Girls Wiki clarifies: "From season 1 to season 4 the show was shot and presented in the traditional TV format [4:3], while season 5, 6 and 7 were shot and aired in a Widescreen format [16:9]." As far as the US DVD release goes, the GG Wiki says "Following creator Amy Sherman-Palladino's directives for the DVD release of the series, Gilmore Girls was published in the traditional 4:3 TV format - the 1.33: 1 aspect ratio - completely from season 1 to 7, also cutting on the use of the modern 5.1 surround audio format." --Jeremy Butler (talk) 13:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspect ratios