lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Madhouse, Inc.

message: The removal of the list of shows and replacing it with a link to AniDB's more complete list is better from the point of view of completeness but makes it much harder to link to information about shows contained within wikipedia.
A combination of textor a 'select list' of Madhouse anime in the main article, but my experience from the anime article is that if you have people a bulleted list that's easy to add stuff too, it'll just get everything under the sun added to it. Half the articles for List_of_anime_companies#Animation_Studios suffer from this long-but-random-and-incomplete-list syndrome. Anyway, revisions to the currently woefully inadequate text welcome. --zippedmartin 02:13, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy to try a different tact with the article to try and get a good balance between quality and quanity.  Of course that means having to write better chunks of texts to mention shows but that hopefully will make the article more useful in the end.
--User:Polymorp 05:02, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Change from list format to inline text

message: Just a small suggestion here, but I think it would be more helpful to have the list of productions be in a by decades format, similar to the articles for some of the other studios like Sunrise. This would make it easier to track down certain productions that one doesn't know the title of, sort productions better by quality and era, and make it a little easier on the eyes. Just an idea, thanks. Achtzehn (talk) 05:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this N-Denizen (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. I actually came to this talk page to suggest that. I guess no one has had time to take the initiative since it was first suggested. I will try to find some time. ask123 (talk) 21:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: List by date

message: Marvel has already announced that Marvel Animation will team up with Madhouse & release two adaptation of Wolverine & Iron-Man in 2010--SilentmanX (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Marvel Anime

message: It links here, should we list it under works? Ranze (talk) 00:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Hellboy: Blood and Iron]]
Talk:Amphibious cargo ship

message: Nicely done. This is much better than simply redirecting to the Charleston class, as I had done. Thanks. -Harmil 13:24, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Still a bit of a stub, so I hope to get some more information here. Jinian 17:18, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Someone correctly said that the LPDs started in the 1960s rather than the 1990s. I fixed the article to state that their taking over of the LKA role started then, but didn't end until the 1990s. Lou Sander (talk) 13:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amphibious transport docks 

message: I seem to recall that this article was formerly titled Attack Cargo Ship. Unfortunately, I don't know how to confirm that. I think that "Attack" title would be better for the article on these grounds:
Attack Cargo Ship Is the historical name, and was used extensively during the meaningful life of the class. Was the original name of the type. Was the name used for 100+ of the type. Was the name under which the type performed most of its service, a massive amount by 100+ ships from 1945-1969. 
Amphibious Cargo Ship Is the more modern name, but was not so widely used. Was introduced in 1969, in the twilight of the life of the type. Was applied to only a few ships (less than a dozen in the U.S., I think). Was not used during any extensive wartime or otherwise notable service. 
IMHO, best would be to title this article "Attack Cargo Ship," with a redirect from "Amphibious Cargo Ship," which is the reverse of the present situation. Lou Sander (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:BTR-70

message: Note that in recent years, the Russian army has upgraded some BTR-60's and 70's with the diesel engine (and the complete rear hull section!) of the BTR-80 which makes identification a little more difficult. I included those upgrades in the "Variants" list and also mentionned a lot of other variants and upgrades that haven't been covered so far.dendirrek 11:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants 
Talk:Magic number (sports)

message: This page (including its examples) are almost exactly the same as the about.com post on calculating magic number...
:about.com mirrors the wikipedia site.  --Holderca1 18:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

message: This article doesn't include how to calculate under a point system. Kingjeff (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Points System

message: These calculations take no account of drawn games - presumably because the editors are unaware that in football, for example, drawn games often result in 1 point for each team. Markb (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  draws 

message: I puzzled and puzzled until my puzzler was sore...but I found a simpler way. Usually, sports broadcasts rapidly flash data that is scant and incomplete, often showing nothing but Games Remaining (GR) and Games Behind Leader (GBL). If one wishes to noodle out the Elemination Number (E), all he needs to do is the following; he doesn't need the teams' complete Win/Loss records. Add Leader's Games Remaining to Trailer's Games Remaining and divide by 2; then subtract from that Trailer's Games Behind Leader; then add 1. Presto! There's the Elimination number. 
See here: E= \frac{GR_L+GR_T}{2}-GBL_T+1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.186.253.206 (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpler Method 

message: All the references are to US sports. Is this terms used outside the USA? If not, this needs to be mentioned. Tesspub (talk) 09:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  US only?
Talk:AIRail Service

message: AirRail, not AiRail —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arado (talk • contribs) . 07:43, July 23, 2005
:Not according to DB... AiRail is correct. See . Slambo (Speak) 11:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If one looks on the DB page referred to by Slambo (same link)   , you will see that the correct spelling is AIRail. I corrected that in the article itself, but cannot/do not know how to change the title. Henning715 18:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Jai Rodriguez

message: Was Jai born in 1977 or 1979? Hotwine8 03:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthyear 

message: Can anyone verify Rodriguez's sexuality? There are reports of him "consorting" with females.
:AfterElton.com quotes him in an interview, describing that he is a gay-identified bisexual man.~ZytheTalk to me! 20:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  To be accurate, the article quotes him as identifying as gay. It is the interviewer who asks him about identifying as bi, because a tabloid had recently 'outed' (or should it be 'inned') him as being bi. Jai himself has never identified as bi, and absolutely denied the original tabloid rumor. There was more info here (from history: ), but it wasn't really relevant to give so much space to one tabloid story. I thought it would be useful to bring the link to the Talk page, in case the issue comes up again. On his MySpace he identifies as gay, and blogs often about his love life, which doesn't include a whole lot of females. Queer Scout 17:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexuality 

message: Okay so yeah.. why the hell isn't there a Hispanic American GLBT category yet? --RyanTee82 (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Still no Hispanic American GLBT category...WHY?

message: His picture needs updating as he has changed a lot since starring on Malibu Country Jking88 (talk) 05:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Church of Jesus Christ – Christian

message: This article is a duplication of this one, and ought to be deleted.
:I have now merged what little information there was in this article into the other article. I think we can turn this article into a redirect page now. Kelisi 12:08, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. —   UTSRelativity (Talk)  16:41, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Invariance theorem

message: Why is it a theorem if it "follows trivially from the definition of a universal turing machine"?  Is there something more to it that I'm missing?--208.120.106.136 (talk) 08:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: C(x)=C_U(x) \leq C_M(x) + c.
An explanation of the meanings of C(x), C_U(x) and C_M(x) will also be needed.  These explanations will likely be found in Li and Vitanyí's book.  Since I don't have it handy, can anyone help clarify this theorem?
Also, in my opinion, any math article concerning a theorem should have (1) an informal statement of the theorem, (2) why it is significant, (3) an informal sketch of one of its proofs, and (4) eventually show a more formal proof.  Vonkje 14:06, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the word 'universal' at the last sentence of the proof. It could read 'invariant', but some texts refer to prefix programming languages as needing the two properties:
* Prefix-free
* Universal (invariance theorem)
This seemed to give clarity, but I feel it leaves the rest of article open to reinterpretation, i.e. what do we really mean by 'optimal'?
--☯Lightbound☯ talk 07:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Universality'
Talk:Highlander: The Series

message: According to the sources, this is a French-Canadian coproduction:
* : "Primarily a French/Canadian coproduction"
* : "Far from being actually unbounded, the cosmopolitanism of Highlander emerged from the input of a number of nationally based participating partners.  Thus does the production of Highlander portend to a number of significant innovations in the rise of international co-production in in the television industry.  As a co-production between France's Gaumont Television and Telefilm, the unobstructed series found financial production participation ..." (long list of companies that invested in the series follows)
* : this source mostly talks about financial issues, but it explicitly mentions "France, Germany, Italy and Japan" as investors amid a long paragraph of how the show was produced under "a Franco-Canadian agreement" in which the show was considered French despite being shot in Canada and Canadian despite being shot in France.
It looks to me like the sources are pretty clear about this.  Even though some other nations are mentioned as having invested money, the sources label this as a "French-Canadian" series. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-production
Talk:Lord Alfred Hayes

message: I have added a resume of his British career. If you want more, let me know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodlow (talk • contribs) 15:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...particularly his pre-WWF years. He was quite active in the NWA, spending much time in Florida and Georgia as a heel and a manager. 66.217.50.209 20:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrestling Career

message: This should be added to the list of ringnames in the side bar as it was the name he was best known as in his British wrestling days (as already mentioned in the main body of text) and the name he still used when he came back to the UK for a spell in the 1970s.  As a matter of fact, when ITV began transmitting WWF specials in 1987 hoted by Hayes and Gene Okerlund, TVTimes actually listed Hayes as Judo Al Hayes.62.190.148.115 (talk) 08:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judo Al Hayes
Talk:Malabar region

message: I hope somebody start an article about Kolathiris.
:There is an article on Kolathiris but it redirects to Chirakkal Raja. It is very confusing.  Mattisse(talk) 15:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kolathiris

message: Why is it not called Malabar region? Calling it Malabar makes the town of Malabar disappear.  Mattisse(talk) 15:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article seems to be a combination of several existing articles and to have the wrong name

message: There are other sources online that claim that the word Malabar actually comes from the Arab word "Ma'bar" which means "passage". The explanation given to support the claim seems to be the fact that Arab merchants had a long standing relationship with the rulers in Kerala even before the birth of Islam. So now the question is who is correct about the origin of the word "Malabar"?
:: For me, it seems more logical that Malabar is etymologically derived from Malappuram than Mala+Bar or Mal+Bar. As for Ma'bar, Malabar has nothing to do with Ma'bar. The Ma'bar of Marco Polo was on South India's east coast not west. It would probably be the modern-day Mahabalipuram or Mamallapuram.-RavichandarMy coffee shop 17:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the word Malabar

message: Wiki Raja 10:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: This article is almost totally unsourced, and its only two sources don't even mention "Malabar region", let alone establish any notability (in contrast to the other Malabar (disabiguation) articles).
The subject appears quite intertwined with, if not identical to Malabar Coast, with which a merger is proposed.  Batternut (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed

message: Please add a proper Map of the region. Remember this is a REGION not a town or city.Manabimasu (talk) 02:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Lehigh and New England Railroad

message: This article has far too much information for a wikipedia article. The style and content are written more from a fan perspective and would be more appropriate for a specfici website. Please contact me directly before reverting edits. Thank you.Oanabay04 (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article condense, clean up

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: . Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mackensen (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Saint Helen's Island

message: This article should be moved in accordance with Wikipedia's naming policy, WP:UE, to the commonly used English name. Although sometimes called by the French name in English for added cachet, Saint Helen's Island is the usual English form.
:It sounds to me like this is close to the national differences issue. What do Quebeckers call it? Septentrionalis 22:44, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I forgot to sign my recommendation for the move. I am a Quebecer (a native English-speaking one- we do exist ;), and I can tell you that both names are used, although it is impossible to say which is used "more", but Saint Helen's Island is what we consider the English name --Larineso 23:15, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Ozzie, Slash, and Flea

message: Frog wasn't in Zenan Bridge at the time. He was in Cursed Woods, so only Chrono, and two other party members were there, no frog. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zero R (talk • contribs) .
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Frog

message: Regarding this change, if it is not speculation, it needs a source. If it is speculation, it does not fit Wikipedia. No original thought, no original research. -- ReyBrujo 20:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, it is fact; it is obvious that this is what it is. However, I have no proof of this. Just because it does not have a source does not mean that it is any less true. I reworded it in that change to make it appear like it would not need a citation. Remove the information if you absolutely must, but there has to be a way to keep it. Can't anyone find a valid source? -Platypus Man | Talk 20:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is why I think keeping the previous version is better. Even though it has a citation tag, people will be encouraged to search for a source. The way it is now, nobody will care whether the assumption is real or not. -- ReyBrujo 21:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense. I added it back. -Platypus Man | Talk 01:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name speculation
Talk:SQL Anywhere

message: not very impartial, indeed....
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.223.10.105 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: People love their databases :)  Hopefully we can straighten some of this out by bringing attention to these type of articles.  Thanks for the comments SqlPac 03:37, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remark

message: The link titled "proxy tables" in the first paragraph points to an article on the network-related topic of default gateways.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.61.116.165 (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor error
Talk:Albrecht von Croÿ

message: Original version stored below for historical reference:
Albrecht Prinz von Croy (*1959 in Mülheim an der Ruhr, Nordrhein-Westfalen) ist ein deutscher Journalist. Seit 1. August 2003 ist er Geschäftsführender Redakteur des Handelsblatts.
Nach Volontariat und ersten journalistischen Erfahrungen in verschiedenen Regionalzeitungen wechselte er 1989 zur Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung. In 1994 wurde er Chef vom Dienst des Magazins der FAZ, und 1999 war er Gründungsmitglied der Anleger-zeitschrift TELEBÖRSE. 2002 wurde er Chef vom Dienst und Mitglied der Chefredaktion der DMEuro, Frankfurt.
Please don't delete this talk page again. If there is content you don't like, edit the page and explain your reasoning. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason this is here is so the anonymous author can avoid its deletion at the German Wikipedia. I see no good-faith reason for it to be here. Additionally, it has no authorship information, making it a copyvio under the GFDL. -- Cyrius|✎ 17:48, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is ridiculous. The article was originally written by me. Copyright templates are not required for articles, Mr. Cyrius. The reason the article is stored at the talk page is that it is the original the English version was based upon. Also, the German Wikipedia voted to keep it, so when things are cleaned up there (i.e. abusive sysops desysopped), responsible Germans may be grateful that someone cares to write articles for them and may want to recreate it. 83.109.179.232 11:55, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Reality-check for the "information" given above (that German Wikipedia voted to keep it - ???) see  vfd in de:WP  Call for undeletion on de:WP  The IP's strong efforts to keep the article in en:WP are to respect for sure - but it has nothing to do with the vfd-procedure in the German WP, which the IP obviously didn't understand. So: If the ridiculous talk against the deleting of this stub in German WP has to stay on this talk page, please don't delete the answer again like you did several times before (see history of this talk page), for you got nothing to hide - ;)  --Rax 19:42, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: When the article was deleted at de: there were 4 keep votes (including "Überarbeiten") and one delete vote (nominator). 83.109.159.205 08:49, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

text: You should be careful about talking of other's deletion of answers, considering your behaviour in regard to German talk pages. 83.109.159.205 08:51, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: To your first meaning: To be able to read gives great advantages. To your second one: Have a nice day, too. --Rax 14:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Méthode champenoise

message: I think that both words of the title should be capitalized as Champagne is a proper noun Bob Palin 16:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

message: As far as I know is that when you ferment wine in the primary and secondary stages it leaves lees or sediment at the bottom of the fermentation container. In this method the fermentation in the bottle makes the same types of sediment and the removal of this sediment is done by inverting the necks of the bottles into a ice-salt mixture. The sediments and the wine surrounding them freeze, the bottle is opened and the plug of frozen sediment is shot out and then the bottle is somehow recapped.
I have no sources, this is third-hand, fourth-hand information and so I don't want to put it on the page until I can find some sources or someone who actually does this. and there is more to this method than I have stated above...anyone know exactly how this is done? Msfwebdude 00:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of the actual method.
Talk:Lu Ji (Shiheng)

message: i am not sure why my categories showed up like that.
:nevermind Stainless steel
It's not clear what the source was, but "The art of writing: teachings of the chinese masters" introduction (by Tony Barnstone and Chou Ping) states that Lu Ji was not actually a traitor, but was only accused of it by his opponent when he lost a battle. This contradicts with the explanation for his execution given here in wikipedia...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poikiloid (talk • contribs) 18:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:6 Street SW station

message: On 7 July 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was merge to List of stations on the C-Train. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/4 Street Southwest/6 Street Southwest (C-Train) for a record of the discussion. – ABCD✉ 16:53, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD

message: Is located here. --kelapstick(bainuu)  19:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion about splitting this article
Talk:No. 119 Squadron RAF

message: Which squadron - title says 119, tex6t says 120? Jaraalbe 08:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I hadn't noticed that. I had originally copied this article over from another article because of a misspelled title. Johann Wolfgang 00:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  120 or 119 squadron?