lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Myrmeciinae

message: What is this story of bringing back an older version by merging again the two subfamilies Myrmeciinae and Prionomyrmecinae into one and reviving Nothomyrmecia as a valid genus?
Baroni Urbani (2005) separates the two subfamilies that are characterized respectively by four (Prionomyrmecinae) and seven (Myrmeciinae) synapomorphies.  
He shows also the inconsistency of the characters used to separate Nothomyrmecia from its senior synonym, Prionomyrmex.
There are no subsequent studies on the subject, even if Archibald et al. (2006) still adopt the wrong classification without justifying their attitude.  Archibald et al. (2006), however,  had no other alternative since no one of the subfamilial characters listed by Baroni Urbani (2005) is visible among their compression fossils.
WIKIPEDIA is not the place of personal opinions even if they were justified, which is not this case.
I’m re-correcting the relative entries until proof of the contrary. 
References:
Archibald, S. B., Cover, S. P., Moreau, C. S. 2006. Bulldog ants of the Eocene Okanagan Highlands and history of the subfamily (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmeciinae).  Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99: 487-523.
Baroni Urbani, C. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of the ant subfamily Prionomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).  Annali del Museo Civico di Stortia Naturale “G. Doria” 96: 581-595.
Sirolo 14:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wilmington Ten

message: This article is a work in progress. As I gather more resources I'll be adding to it. CJ 14:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would just like to say to people that the references section should be one of the last sections in the article, and section headers shouldn't be written in nearly all-highercase letters thankyou - whoever made the article look like a pig's breakfast in doing do. ;-) Lradrama 18:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I think this article would be of great use for contextualizing these events. There was a lot of lead-up that explains why things happened the way they did. https://www.ourstate.com/the-1970s-the-wilmington-10/ 174.108.252.203 (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in progress
Talk:Kijūrō Shidehara

message: During the first year of his term as prime minister, Shidehara (referred to in the magazine as SK) was selected by TIME Japan as the hottest man alive. The issue stated as follows
        "SK has done it again. Not only has he taken the role of Prime Minister during these trying times in Japan; He looks fine as hell doing it! His wife is a very lucky woman. SK is very sexy. He has a kind and loving face, but under that suit he's bronzed and buffed to emaculate perfection. sometimes I leave my window open at night in hopes that my dream of SK climbing in comes true. His face is one that will not soon be forgotten. Not to mention his abs. I'm sweating on my printing press right now."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by All about pencil led (talk • contribs) 02:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TIME Japan's 'Hottest Man Alive 1945'
Talk:History of Kent

message: There seems to be no information about the temples and history of springhead/ebbsfleet, should this be added and does anyone have any vaild sources? - Richard Thompson 14:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Springhead Temples

message: There is a section that has been added which contains superfluous information, but I feel to not delete it in lieu of someone with more knowledge doing so. Unsure if it has been added or amended.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.197.197 (talk) 23:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfortunate Vandalisation
Talk:Tsardom of Vidin

message: Rostislav Mikhailovich was not crowned in Tarnovo as he never took the city. Jotaro97 (talk) 16:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowned in Tarnovo? 

message: --Rhedey de băbeni (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fruszin prinnce 

message: The Tsardom of Vidin was never a vassal of Serbia. There is not a single source to support these claims.
The article is subject to constant vandalism.
I'm starting a discussion here to avoid an edit war.
I appeal to the editors who restored the passages about imaginary vassalage to Serbia in the article and urge them to provide credible, reliable and independent sources for these unsubstantiated claims.
If necessary, I will seek arbitration of this dispute.Bononia1 (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Bononia1. To change the stable version of an article you need to provide your sources here and gain a consensus, not the opposite. For now nothing has been provided. You changed a lot of data in the article without providing any sources for those changes. What's more, you deleted even credible sources of information. It is possible that some of the information in the article is not correct in your opinion, but that does not mean that it really is. I suggest you point out what you disagree with point by point and discuss it on the talk page. Keep in mind that some of the information you submit is not completely reliable or is supported only by few researchers. To begin with, I agree that there is no evidence of a vassal position vis-a-vis Serbia. I could not find such sources and suggest that this information be removed. Jingiby (talk) 13:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tsardom of Vidin was never a vassal of Serbia
Talk:Kingdom of Slavonia

message: No refrences  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.102.115 (talk) 17:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: This article is totally incomplete, it takes the Kingdom of Slavonia only as a post-1745 Habsburg formation, whereas it has a much longer tradition since the middle ages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.57.175 (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Drums of Fu Manchu

message: I've removed the following text:
An unfounded rumour suggests that there was going to be a sequel to Drums of Fu Manchu but the United States had become directly involved in World War II by that time, in which China was an ally.  Various rumours imply either that the Chinese government objected to the serial, the State Department decided for themselves to suppress it or that Republic simply thought that the mood of the nation would not be in favour of a Chinese villain.  However, the fact that Republic, in 1943, edited and released in the US and its other free-world venues a feature version of this serial, makes these rumouurs seem extremely unlikely.
When I can find a good reference it can come back again. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed sequel section
Talk:Václav Talich

message: That passage about "at least the Communists...." is not wikipedia-like in style, and in any case needs a citation.  Not sure how to edit it, though.  Any suggestions welcome, & thanks, DJRafe 20:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjective text

message: Although no model of clarity, the caption for the image of a Talich concert programme seems to suggest that the concert included the premiere of Dvorak's piano concerto.  That suggestion is clearly false: the concert was decades later than the work's composition, and Wikipedia's own article on the work states, "The work was premiered in Prague on March 24, 1878, with the orchestra of the Prague Provisional Theatre conducted by Adolf Cech with the Czech pianist Karel Slavkovsky."  For now, I will try to clean up the caption to eliminate the misleading suggestion, but I'm writing here to call attention to the matter and plead for someone more knowledgeable of the Czech language and the history reflected in this programme to improve it beyond what I can do. Drhoehl (talk) 20:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Caption for Concert Programme Image
Talk:Jungle Girl (serial)

message: Jungle Girl was the first sound serial to have a female lead.
The reference may claim this, but it doesn't appear to be accurate.  Here are three earlier sound serials with female leads:
*The King of the Kongo starring Jacqueline Logan, 1929.
*The Perils of Pauline starring Evalyn Knapp, 1933.
*Queen of the Jungle starring Mary Kornman, 1935.
It would be fair to say that it's the first Republic serial with a female lead, though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skylax (talk • contribs) 01:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First female lead?
Talk:Generation Joshua

message: Sources...
* 1 "WHEREAS, Generation Joshua, a youth civics and leadership program organized by the Home School Legal Defense Association and headquartered in Purcellville, celebrates its 20th anniversary in 2023; and
WHEREAS, Generation Joshua was founded in December 2003 by Michael Farris, Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) President Mike Smith, and the HSLDA Board of Trustees..." (and it mentions their "first event in 2004", so the founding in 2003 is correct)
* 2 "Gen J, as it's known, was launched officially in 2004, although it existed in other forms for several years before that." (doesn't say founded, just launched)
If Virginia legislators noted the 20th anniversary of GenJ in 2023, and specifically noted the date, then they didn't come up with that out of thin air. The group started their activities the following year, but they were founded in 2003. APK whisper in my ear 03:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  founding year
Talk:Laboratoires Servier

message: "The leading pharmaceutical company in France"? By whose count? In what category (sales, customer service, innovation, regulatory compliance, green operations, employee retention)?
This sounds quite like an ad-ticle instead of an article. I humbly request rewrite, since I do not perceive myself capable of fixing this one right out. 136.165.46.150 15:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I feel like there should be a pronunciation key for this.  I have no idea how to pronounce it, so it would be helpful. 132.235.44.114 (talk) 05:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation?
Talk:FC Kryvbas Kryvyi Rih (1959–2013)

message: , I think we ought to merge articles on FC Kryvbas Kryvyi Rih and FC Kryvbas Kryvyi Rih (2020) since in 2016 FC Hirnyk Kryvyi Rih withdrew from competitions and reentered national competitions already in 2017 while the original Kryvbas did not participate in any national competitions since then (2016). Also the Hirnyk's competition record in 2017-2020 could be accounted for Kryvbas. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:SC Tavriya Simferopol

message: It's official, they changed their name to Skif and applied for a Russian license.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.195.129 (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone change the name of the article? 
Talk:Manamoc

message: 'Manamoc Island', which is supposed to be in Romblon province, is different from 'Manamoc' which is part of Cuyo Islands, Palawan so they cannot be merged.  The coordinates of Manamoc Island (Romblon) wrongly points to Manamoc (Cuyo).  I tried searching for Manamoc (Romblon) on the internet and books but cannot find any 'Manamoc' in Romblon. Manamoc (Cuyo) is way too far to be part of Romblon; Antique and Aklan provinces are in between them.  'Manamoc Island' (Romblon) has no references (since 2007), I suggest that it be deleted.Briarfallen (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Manamoc Island merging with Manamoc

message: Please give me some information or short story on catholic church from manamoc island 175.176.77.76 (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story of manamoc church
Talk:Jon Lee Anderson

message: I separated 'Personal life and early career' into separate sections, for coherence; and removed a contentious, unsourced comment regarding subject's book on Che Guevara WP:GRAPEVINE. Shasta9 (talk) 03:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section separation 

message: Author has more than 10 works, so a separate bibliography has been created as per guidelines at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bibliographies#Author_bibliographies
Have commenced tidy-up using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 03:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Ahmed Sheikh

message: This is a bit biased....the whole occupation thing....if you guys knew anything, you would know that there was no such thing as Palestinians (they only started called themselves that in the 70's)....They are Jordanians.
70.156.139.16 15:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article only pushes the implication that Al Jazeera (by extension of its editor-in-chief) is biased towards (or even driven by) Palestine. Lets face it: Al Jazeera is - regardless of feelings that were hurt during their coverage of the Iraq war - one of the more serious TV stations in the world. A more balanced article would include descriptions of the accolades the station has received during Ahmed Sheikh's time as editor-in-chief or other positive achievements in his career. 83.89.0.118 (talk) 06:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Jan Janský

message: The article says "He is credited with the first classification of blood into the four types (A, B, AB, O)"
But the ABO blood group system article claims "Landsteiner described A, B, and O; Decastrello and Sturli discovered the fourth type, AB, in 1902." (with citation to O; Decastrello and Sturli work). Both Landsteiner's and Decastrello and Sturli's discoveries were made before Jansky published his article. So he probably was not first. Maybe just independent? --Jirka6 (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First?
Talk:Zabaione

message: This article needs attention in the following areas:
* Copy edit for structure    
This page is not cited in dessert main page
Why does dessert link goto VEGETARIAN dessert.
* Citations from reliable sources, properly formatted
--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 06:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPFood assessment 

message: Why does dessert link goto VEGETARIAN dessert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.48.94.34 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Use a web directory or search engine to find a recipe. There are hundreds of recipes, and Wikipedia isn't going to list them all, or choose among them. See WP:NOT and WP:EL. Mindmatrix 17:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe needed 

message: The article mentions that samabayón (Spanish for zabaione) is a "expensive" icecream flavor. I'm from Argentina, and this flavor is listed at the same price that any other flavor available. It's even one of the most popular flavors (with chocolate, vanilla, and strawberry).
What's the source for that statement? A. A. Nebbia (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - I fixed this - AKeen (talk) 06:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentinian ice cream flavor 

message: I think it's a little misleading to call it a "dessert".  At least in some formulations it's more of a beverage, like eggnog.  Does anyone object to saying "dessert or beverage" or some such? --Trovatore (talk) 10:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dessert? 

message: The supposed history (which was in the Preparation section) was clearly a joke on the shroud of Turin. Looking back through the revision history it seems that there were several edits suggesting different origins. None of them cited any sources. I have therefore removed the historical reference until such a time when somebody can produce a citation.
Leo C Stein (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This page suggests that “zabaione” is the preferred spelling of this word. I believe that is a misspelling of “zabaglione” which is based on the word’s pronunciation. “Zabaglione” should be the first choice. 2600:1700:24F8:3C10:85F6:A198:445D:F3AA (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's exactly the opposite. The "wrong" form is "zabaglione"; see here: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zabaione, and translate into English "Lo zabaione, o per ipercorrettismo zabaglione". JacktheBrown (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preferred spelling is…? 

message: Enfairytaled in polish. 31.182.107.233 (talk) 18:05, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zabajone
Talk:Italian Regency of Carnaro

message: A while ago I noticed that Charter of Carnaro, as a subtopic of this article, doesn't seem to have WP:POTENTIAL, and could be merged into this article instead. Do others agree? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge discussion 

message: To say that D'Annunzio and De Ambris were Freemasons is to highlight the role of Italian Freemasonry in the Regency of Carnaro.
Connection between Fascism and Freemasonry is not so obvious. 79.20.41.90 (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't "highlight" it like that. If there is a connection between the constitution of the Regency and Freemasonry, then find a reliable source that makes that point explicitly to support an explicit statement. Adding innuendo unsupported by a source is WP:OR, which is not allowed. 20:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freemasonry 

message: Dead link. JackkBrown (talk) 21:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Italian Regency of Carnaro#Further reading|Further reading]]
Talk:Secondary school

message: Nobody in Colombia uses that expression... We use "básica secundaria" and "educación media". It looks like the person who linked "Education in Colombia" didn't bother about reading it.
Brayan Habid (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Segunda enseñanza" in Colombia (???) 

message: This page lack the school systems of more important countries than Somalia and Saudi Arabia. What about France or Germany?
79.211.190.150 (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We have a summary of the French system at Secondary education in France.  Dbfirs 22:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other countries (???) 

message: More material is being added referring to the ambiguous term 'grade', this has been discussed many times before. It is convenient not global. There is a template available, so that an age equivalent conversion can be added. See  to investigate its potential. ClemRutter (talk) 10:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look at grades 

message: In the table with ages and US/UK names for the age groups, reference actually calls it "Old British system" rather than "England (forms)". The reference seems more correct on this, also the table might be better if it included the UK "key stages" instead as the "England (forms)" row is for outdated terminology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capturts (talk • contribs) 14:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  England (forms) 

message: In the "Secondary school" page. There's a sentence, "some UK private schools, i.e. public schools, admit pupils between the ages of 13 and 18.", in the paragrph two. I think the "i.e." which in this sentence aimed at to explan the meaning of private schools. It shows that "private schools" is public schools. I don't think this statement is right. I hope someone who know that can check for it. I'm not an English native speaker. If it is a misunderstand, please beg your pardon and teach me the true meaning of this word. Thank you. Yuzhouxingzou (talk) 08:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An issue about the usage of the i.e. in the "Secondary school" page
Talk:Wink

message: That Lyndon B. Johnson Picture mentions "some commentators" but there's no citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.18.3 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

message: The reference to Sarah Palin, while accurate and cited, has no place in this article. Just because it is accurate and cited does not mean that it is appropriate subject matter for the topic of the article.  Assume good faith. If the article had more references to famous "winks," then it may be appropriate; however, referencing this one person does not further this article and seems politically motivated.  This should be removed from the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:I agree, but its hilarious.  This whole article needs a re-write.  At least some order, yeah? -Knowl  -<(I am questing for Knowledge!) (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sarah Palin

message: That's a hilarious picture. We should all try to post more and more hilarious images of people blinking. Maybe use Photoshop to make it even more exaggerated.
ww 
71.59.154.3 05:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, thanks for noting it! :) GeneralBelly (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Various comments

message: Further to comments regarding Palin's (in)famous winks, I'd suggest that instead of removing that info (a destructive move) simply because it stands alone that we should be constructive and add other examples of winking in popular culture, etc.  GeneralBelly (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous winks 

message: Are there culural differences between "the west" and latin America ? -- Beardo (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural differences

message: Why is the meaning of "sexual attraction" given such prominence - it is mentioned first both in the lead and in the text? It is not the most common use by far! Children learn to recognize and practice winking as a somewhat jocular means of implying secret shared knowledge a long time before they even begin to consider indicating sexual attraction. The flirtatious use is clearly of secondary nature. It's like mentioning "have sex" as the first meaning of "do", "sleep" or "lie". Too many Wikipedians seem to be thinking with their penes while editing - they had better go j**k off in advance in order to be able to edit with a clear mind.
I'll make some edits to adjust the relative prominence of editorial erection.--91.148.159.4 (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual attraction? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mollyabell1 (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Small Group Communication
Talk:Ronald Kline

message: I changed this page to a redirect - the prior version consisted almost entirely of a less-well-maintained version of Bradley_Willman#United_States_v._Kline.  IMHO, a bio article that is exlcusively about a single criminal conviction and its aftermath raises some WP:BLP concerns, and the redirect does the same job.  
OTOH, if someone wants to come up with some other published materials establishing that Judge Kline is otherwise notable, we could put together a full bio article.  TheronJ 15:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tiger economy

message: There ought to be an article about the lion economic countries of Africa, preferably with a picture of which part of the continent it's about. Please help with this 85.230.94.111 (talk) 11:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lion economies

message: I removed a large portion of the Similar section as it looked to be blatantly plagiarized from Here and Here. Please let me know if I made a mistake or if you have any concerns. 97.121.156.1 (talk) 05:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed content
Wikipedia talk:Availability

message: Well, as I noted here I have serious objections about equating presence of sources with notability. It looks as we have utterly diverging opinions on what the problem with the current notability guideline is. :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, my entire point is that it shouldn't matter what you think is notable, this is a standard for what we can include free from people's personal ideas about what is notable, since those only seem to confuse the issue.  We have a bias as far as sources are available and people are interested in writing the articles, but we needn't impose additional selective pressure.  Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

message: If you're watching, I'm trying to push an alternative to an all-encompassing notability guideline at Wikipedia:Article inclusion.  Some input would be great. --badlydrawnjeff talk 01:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An alternative