lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pope Zephyrinus

message: A historian would note that Callixtus was Zephyrinus' deacon, that Zephyrinus began the conversion of earlier catacombs now collected under the name of Callixtus... but a historian might be too put off by the intentionally misleading, anachronistic "styles" offered here to feel much like improving this little article, so pregnant with infoboxes and weak on text. --Wetman (talk) 08:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the whole of the Conflicts section a direct quote from "Butler"? I was trying to WP:BTW but that section eludes me. It reads like an olden-day hagiography and there was indeed an Alban Butler who wrote a Lives that might fit the bill, but I don't have access to his work. If so, we need to make the citation explicit. Kevin/Last1in (talk) 13:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Butler's hagiography of this pope can be found online here; this mysterious paragraph (diff) does not come from there. While I limited my edits to little more than verifying & cleaning up the cites, one could significantly improve this article thru using Eusebius (many translations), Hippolytus (translations at New Advent & Christian Classics Ethereal Library websites), & the Liber Pontificalis (translated by Raymond Davis, & published by University of Liverpool Press). Using these would change this article from a hagiography to an article better illustrating WP:NPOV, as well as adding useful details. -- llywrch (talk) 06:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicts Section 

message: I I Removed English Name Parameter Because English Name is Deleted on English Wikipedia and Back the English name Please Because the Infobox Name of The Old Changes of this Page is Becomes Bad,The Infobox Name and the Page Name is Similar.For Sample, The Page Name is Pope Paul I and the Infobox Name is Pope Paul I Too but the Orginal is, The Page Name is Pope Paul I and The Infobox Name is Paul I Not Pope Paul I and You See that the Deletion of English Name is Making English Wikipedia Pages So Simple Lang Ako (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello wikipedia Administrator Read this Please
Talk:Rose-Marie

message: Should this page still be titled Rose Marie (operetta) even though it's been transferred to musical theatre domain? I do not have any really firm convictions either way. MarianKroy (talk) 16:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Title

message: No I don't mean captions!  My deceased mother's music copy - somewhere in my attic - says on the cover page "Rose Marie, or The Maid of the Mounties".  I believe most shows had similar subtitles at that time, but Google finds no references to this phrase.  (I cannot remember whether there is a hyphen.) Shannock9 (talk) 15:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtitle
Talk:Runaways (musical)

message: This play was produced in the late 1900's and was taken off the off broadway because they said so!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.103.228 (talk) 22:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment makes no sense, perhaps it is meant for elsewhere? In any event, I'll remove it in a day or so if it is not clarified to be related to this article. JeanColumbia (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Salad Days (musical)

message: I have completely removed this inappropriate section. Wikipedia articles are not blogs or crystal balls. Note also that instructions like "please update" and the other instructional comments are completely inappropriate in an article. When a production takes place, and if it is notable, it can be added to the performance history. Voceditenore (talk) 14:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk:Salad Days (musical)/Temp. Moreschi (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re Section "Productions Now. (Please update)"

message: So the London run lasted over 2200 performances, and the only leading lady mentioned is Eleanor Drew. I'm surprised there isn't a Wiki page dedicated to her (only a red link). Valetude (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading lady
Talk:The Scarlet Pimpernel (musical)

message: While listening to 'You Are My Home' (I have the CD of the original cast) I heard someone singing in the background as an almost echo 'You are my home/You make me strong/And in this world of strangers,I belong to someone'. This person sounds a lot like Percy/The Scarlet Pimpernel/Douglas Sills. I was wondering if this was simply a reuse of the same actor's voice, or another person's completely. I know that Percy/The Scarlet Pimpernel was not in the prison. If anyone could help explain this I would be very deeply obliged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.59.164.32 (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Singer identity?
Talk:She Loves Me

message: I'm going to start expanding this plot summary as soon as I can.MarianKroy (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fantastic job as usual.  I remember seeing the Jimmy Stewart version (and "She's got mail"), but I never saw the show.  If you see any way to slim this down just a little bit, that would be great, because it's a little long, but if not, no problem.  All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: This comment was placed in the article on July 20, 2018. I deleted this comment from the article and am putting the entire comment here, and am also adding the IP who wrote it.
"Edit: The prior author stated that Michael McGrath has died and was thus replaced by McGowan. McGrath is still alive and activly working as an actor. Updates can be found on his Twitter account (@mcgrathbway)! It is still true that McGrath left the cast of "She Loves Me" before the show was broadcasted!" by User IP 94.134.98.47
Flami72 (talk) 13:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: McGrath
Talk:Culture of Puerto Rico

message: I removed your addition to the lead because there's one source states this: "Many people in Colombia and Puerto Rico had Sicilian ancestry..."  The other source is a travel guide thus not very reliable - see WP:RS. I removed it for WP:WEIGHT, undue weight for the lead of the article. Do you have more / better WP:RS for this? --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: your "very important contributions and influences of Italians in Puerto Rico"
Talk:List of capital ships of Sweden

message: It is not really accurate to describe early 17th ships like Vasa as ships of the line, considering that the line of battle tactic didn't even come about until the late 17th century. A lot of them are probably better described as galleons.
Peter Isotalo 13:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of ships of the line of the Royal Swedish Navy

message: I suggest that List of battleships of the Royal Swedish Navy and List of ships of the line of the Royal Swedish Navy be merged together into an article named List of capital ships of the Royal Swedish Navy.
This solves the problem indicated at Talk:List of battleships of the Royal Swedish Navy about these not being proper battleships, and the problem indicated at Talk:List of ships of the line of the Royal Swedish Navy about ships predating ships-of-the-line.
76.65.128.198 (talk) 05:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Songs for a New World

message: It seems to me that this section is POV and needs references and to be reworked.
-Broadwaygal 18:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out some of the POV language and changed the heading.  It's a start on an analysis of the piece.  More could be said about the musical styles.  A section could be added describing the main themes and characters discussed in the songs.  Of course there could be more on how the piece came to be written, and more about productions.  A google search should turn up more references with information.  -- Ssilvers 01:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical Breakdown

message: I am wondering if anyone has an opinion about describing the "plot" of this piece?  Each song is self-contained. I am wondering if each description should go next to the song, or in its own separate section?  Thanks --Broadwaygal 18:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical Numbers

message: The Synopsis added on June 17, 2013 by User talk:‎74.102.50.82 was a cut-and-paste from the MTI Shows synopsis at [], and a copy violation. I deleted that synopsis per WP:COPY and will notify the IP. (This is the 4th article I found from this IP, with a cut-and-paste Synopsis from MTI Shows.) Flami72 (talk) 10:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy violation
Talk:Stop the World – I Want to Get Off

message: The film, at least, is filled with mime, and uses a simple, plain circus set, costumes, and make up, dancing, announcements, and fragments of nursery rhymes and American songs and melodies. Are these features not mentioned because they have no reliable source? Sad. David Spector (user/talk) 19:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mime
Talk:Street Scene (opera)

message: According to her homepage this is just a collection of undergrad and grad school essays that she's posted on the internet for a while. There's no reason to treat her as a reliable source. Moreover, her essays contain individual citations to the scholarly literature so it's those references that should be checked and then cited to. On at least one occasion, in her "German Requiem" article, she cites a source stating that the Franco-Prussian War ended in 1866! So either her source or her citation is incorrect there; it would be wise since she does not appear to meet WP:RS any more than if she had put up her undergraduate essays on a geocities page, for such references to be checked rather than simply changing our references to match her citations without double-checking them. TheGrappler (talk) 17:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Nancy Thuleen link a reliable source?
Talk:Harold Evensky

message: What is with that image?  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The image

message: This article reads more like a resume for Evensky and an advertisement for his services than a notable article.--Jeffro77 (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 
Talk:Sweet Smell of Success (musical)

message: It looks to me like the synopsis currently on the page might be a copyvio, but I don't have the soundtrack to check.  —  MusicMaker 17:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.guidetomusicaltheatre.com/shows_s/sweetsmellofsuccess.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 17:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mike Lange

message: TSN using wikipedia as a source!  Pascal.Tesson 21:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSN 

message: ;"Go for it, Mario; go for it.":I don't remember this one...--Stivo 05:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Expression 

message: ... returned to the Penguins for the 1976–77 season ...
... From 1975 until 2006, Lange served as the lead play-by-play ...
If he "returned" in 1976, how can he be the lead play-by-play since 1975?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjb (talk • contribs) 16:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's supposed to say he came back for 75-76, since he only left for one year, but I'm not sure.-Wafulz (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Information 
Talk:Foxtrot-class submarine

message: Write now, the assertion is made, "...the Captain, believing that a war might already be in progress, ordered a nuclear torpedo armed for use; apparently two other high-ranking officers on board, notably Vasiliy Arkhipov, calmed him down.[No source citations provided for assertion made in last sentence]"
*BBC carried a similar story, overheard in a bar in Havana during a reunion of former soviet naval participants, in 2002, I think. 
*The entry at Vasiliy Arkhipov also tells a similar story. 
*Chronology of Submarine Contact During the Cuban Missile Crisis October 1, 1962 - November 14, 1962 entry for Saturday, October 25, 1962--1729 (local time) reads: ... Although aware of the U.S. notification that practice-depth charges would be used, the initial impression of the Soviet submariners was that they were under attack. (Deck Log Book of Cony, 10/27/62; Huchthause, p. 169) 
Entry for Saturday, October 27, 1962-2050-2052 (local time): With its batteries running low, submarine B-59/C-19 is forced to surface and heads east. Although surrounded by U.S. ships, submarine captain Vitali Savitsky realizes that they are not in a "state of war; one of the destroyers has a lively band playing jazz. Pawyilee (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuban missle crisis assertion 

message: The B-39 Foxtrot submarine may have been relocated.  I visited B-39 "Cobra" while in Seattle during the summer of 2003.  Here are the links: http://russiancobra.com/, http://russiansubseattle.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.214.128.4 (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-39 Foxtrot may have moved 

message: Its current status as of April 2015 is unclear.
:Unless someone's updating daily, current and currently should not be used in an encyclopedia article, as the reference could become outdated at any time. For similar reasons, past-tense verbs should be used, as most articles will outlive the present-tense status of breaking news.
:– Changed to Its subsequent status was unknown. Sca (talk) 13:57, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Current'
Talk:Soviet submarine B-427

message: The phrase "hotel load" needs to be clarified as there is no relevant page concerning it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.42.21.232 (talk) 13:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As a point of interest toward following this submarine, it is for sale (seen on August 14, 2020) for U.S. $1,100,000
https://www.maritimesales.com/SSH10.htm
CRT Hobbyist (talk) 17:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submarine is apparently for sale.
Talk:Soviet submarine B-39

message: Why the part about being among the largest ever built? They are about the same size as the US WWII fleet sub, and are dwarfed by the Japanese I-400 class. Rees11 (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest ever built 

message: This article says she was called "Black Widow" at one time; can anyone confirm this? Has someone confused this one with the boat in the Medway which is also labelled "B-39" (and is likely to be a confusion with this one)? Xyl 54 (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Zulu-class submarine

message: Are these flagicons available somewhere separately? 
Trekphiler 03:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just click them - these are flags used for icons. CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 08:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Foxtrot B-80 section was added here, with this edit, in January, but it seemed out of place; so I've moved it to a page on the B-80 itself. I trust everyone is OK with that. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foxtrot B-80
Talk:Queen Elizabeth High School (Calgary)

message: GATE Enrichment doesn't exist anymore.
Chungy 16:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does.  BlueStarz 22:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Fowler, stop discussing Chungy's discussion of wikipedia and convocate already. luv, Phobal 13:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aled Edwards

message: When discussing a person's accomplishments it would be logical to mention any entities he or she had executive relations with. Otherwise articles such as Bill Gates or Jimmy Wales would be woefully devoid of information. -- TikiTDO Talk - 04:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 

message: I removed the following from the article
:Based on the public disclosure by the government of Ontario, Canada, the salary of Dr. Aled Edwards in 2005 is $340,999.96, making him one of the highest paid university professors in Canada.
The editor himself has also indicated  that there were some issues with the source.  I think there are more notable things about a professor than the salary.  Thoughts?  --TeaDrinker 21:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salary
Talk:North Trail High School

message: Another notable alumni: Emmy Award winning, FOX News Television News Anchor Maria Arcega-Dunn, former CNN International Anchor and Reporter is a graduate of Crescent Heights High School.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsdiva (talk • contribs) 02:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

message: The photo in the infobox looks like absolute dogshit - its crooked, is a close up of the door, and is about 1/3 sidewalk. Would it be possible to get an actual professional to provide a photo? 68.146.228.143 05:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to pay a professional, take a photo yourself, use another existing free image (a dozen are on Commons), or edit the image to fix the "crookedness".  But, regardless, there should be a pic.  --Rob 17:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 
Talk:University College Dublin Students' Union

message: "In 2006 there was a swing to the right in the Sabbatical Officer elections with no left leaning students winning a sabbatical officer position.This reflects the satisfaction among students with their position in society with their interests being represented on a national level by UCD SU and USI.It also reflects satisfaction with the Fianna Fail-Progressive Democrats, Government of Ireland which has been in office since 1997 and it is widely expected that the next general election will be in 2007."
I'm going to delete this section over the weekend on factual grounds unless I'm given a good reason to keep it.
Byrno 23:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discusion 

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 13:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removals
Talk:Pop Song 89

message: User:Fantailfan asked in an edit summary: "what is OR speculation?" OR is Original Research, a Wikipedia no-no as outlined in WP:OR. Part of the text in question is: "The title "Pop Song 89" indicates that it is the 89th track R.E.M. recorded, including B-sides and Chronic Town."  I've never heard of this being the reason for the song's title and it sounds like someone's speculation to me. Either way, this is an unsourced claim and needs some proof that this is really what the band intended the song's title to indicate. wikipediatrix 21:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an unverifiable claim.--Fantailfan 01:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Exactly my point. Unverifiable claims cannot be made in Wikipedia articles. This is the whole point of WP:OR. wikipediatrix 02:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR 

message: : This edit removes "bubblegum pop" (leaving the source for it) and adds "pop rock", citing a source (with a supporting quote).
The source left behind clearly supports "bubblegum pop".
The phrase "pop rock" is not in any of the sources.
The quote provided with the source is not in the source cited. - SummerPhDv2.0 08:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre, again
Talk:Core & Satellite

message: How is this an advertisement?  I dont work for the company and simply explains a technique used in my industry.  Their are plenty of books on the subject and list various companies.  My company isn't even listed because we dont use this styleFrank4southmiami 21:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The ((advert)) tag is a matter of effect, not intent.  Mdbrownmsw 03:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Not in my opinion. Buzzwords? Not really. The article has a lot of industry jargon. It is succinct due to that fact. Were it to be made more approachable to the layperson, the article would be considerably longer.  03:21, 8 April 2007 74.135.217.160
So make it longer and and kill the jargon.  We're not writing for people who already know what we're talking about. This is an encyclopedia. --SueHay 04:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?
Talk:André-Marie Mbida

message: The original author was probably French and the English in this article is very unclear.  I have absolutely no idea what the phrase "the history is dumb on top" is supposed to mean, for example.  Article needs a rewrite to make it clearer. Dugwiki 21:43, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article hard to understand 
Talk:Supper (album)

message: Is there any evidence that the parentheses are more than a optical gimmick?  --79.223.0.161 (talk) 14:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Smog) 
Talk:Horde (band)

message: The Dark Endless link is wrong--the Dark Endless referred to in the article is actually a band, not an album made by Marduk.
: Haha yeah, that Dark Endless link isn't too Christian... the first song has profanity, and album cover has an inverted cross - Roozbenjrox 00:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That must be wrong picture?
         
:-If the picture is meant to be of Jayson, that looks nothing like him?
I have pictures of Jayson, does anybody want me to put them up?
:- yes please!! the one right now is horrible!!! --62.204.125.5 15:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: - Yes! We definitely need pictures. Not only here on en but also at the other Wikipedias. --D135-1r43 17:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

text: - YES!!! the one right now is horrible!!--213.103.134.236 13:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 