lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:User en-5

message: The "firetruck red" color scheme is harsh and nerve-rattling. I am not a partisan for a specific alternative color scheme, but *anything* has got to be better than the extremely harsh red. Can someone with expertise in web design please provide some input? Can someone please propose an alternative before simply reverting the template back to the "in your face" red? Thanks! dr.ef.tymac 03:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no such thing as "standardization." wiki will rest where ever its users choose. fr-5 is not red. level 5 does not exist for many languages. it-5 is red, but not the same red as en-5. the discrepancies continue. i'm going for some martha stewart colors that are popular here at wiki--Hollerbackgril 21:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: http://www.siteprocentral.com/html_color_code.html -- have fun --Hollerbackgril 21:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent change.  RJC Talk 03:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Follow-up: Thanks for getting rid of the ExTrEmE rEd. It was harsh and sorely in need of change. If anyone feels the need to change it back, don't do it. Just stare at this message for a few seconds ... There now, annoying, wasn't it. dr.ef.tymac 21:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Indeed, many times it was proposed to change the colors of the Babel system (Wikipedia talk:Babel/Archive2#Level 5 colors is the most recent one with proposal for new colors). Apparently nobody ever gave a damn. But the current colour scheme is nonsensical. Army1987 11:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  color change proposal
Talk:Francis Howell North High School

message: The site claims Francis Howell North is in St. Peters, Missouri but it is actually in St. Charles, Missouri.  This should be fixed on the page.  ----Zactak2009
:The article and the sources I've found state that the school is on the border between the cities, though the St. Charles post office provides mail service. What is to be changed, and what is the reliable source? —ADavidB 11:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:David J. Griffiths

message: The last line: "His Elementary Particles course, typically taught to junior-level undergraduates, has been compared favorably with graduate courses in quantum field theory at Stanford University." is not true.  At Stanford Griffith's book is used in an undergraduate course on high energy physics.  Above that course Stanford offers a higher undergrad course on quantum field theory and string theory.  The graduate courses in quantum field theory use the book on QFT by Peskin.  The level of that series is several leagues above Griffith's book.  I mean no disrespect to his book, which is absolutely fantastic, but the comparison is incorrect.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.12.93.35 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I took both Griffith's undergraduate course on Elementary Particles in '88-'89 at Reed and Lin's graduate course on QFT in '91 at Stanford and Griffith's was far superior.  Can't speak to Peskin's current course. zowie 06:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Elementary Particles vs. QFT

message: I started a list of thesis students. Please add any additions you know of with thesis titles if possible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Waitati (talk • contribs) 00:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does a list of student theses really satisfy notability? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.31.106.34 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Well actually for future historical reasons and the impact David Griffith's Introduction to Quantum Mechanics has had on the academic community. Actually a list of some of his students might be useful; however, I think we should wait 20 years for the dust to settle a bit if you know what I mean. (If you don't then it the concept that every event, even ones in physics, needs at least 20 years for all the politics and issues to settle before we will completely understand it. In practice though, there are notable examples like Henry Moseley   where it has taken 70-90 years for people to appreciate the connections between people in physics history Physics16 (talk) 06:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of thesis students
Talk:India (actress)

message: * No references at all, for someone as inherently controversial as a porn star, we absolutely need Wikipedia:Reliable source references. IMDB and IAFD don't count, as they're anonymous contribution databases, with minimal editorial control. Can't see marking higher than  without them, and, in fact, controversial entries could just get deleted without them. Is there a publicly available bio on her web site? That can be used.
* She appeared with some notable music stars, and put out a mainstream album, so the importance scale could go to  if a reference shows that the greater world outside porn noticed.
* Filmography section is too long. Keep the first entry, and the Snoop Dogg ones that have articles, but other than those, just keep a few (half dozen, say) representative ones. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Filmographies --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment (and short review) 

message: The article claims India to publish stuff via karadavis.com, as well as working for the moonlite bunny ranch. there seems to be absolutely no India material at karadavis.com. Is that sentence a cleverly disguised advertising ? Same goes for the brothel, though that web site is not too conclusive.
If nobody offers some hints or sources I will remove that sentence Tullius2 22:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  (actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC 
Talk:Intrafusal muscle fiber

message: The term intrafusal fibers are used for both muscle and nerve fibers in the article, thus someone who is not so familiar with the subject may be puzzled.C39 14:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: confusing for who are not competent

message: I suggest that there should be a separate Proprioception topic with subtopics: Muscle Spindles, Golgi Tendon Organs.  This would provide a better format through witch one could explain the facilitory role of muscle spindles (type I and IIa intrafusal fibers) and the inhibitory role of golgi tendon organs.
*The word proprioception isn't even used in this article.  Maybe it should.--Drewlew (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Proprioception Topic...
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles

message: The redirect List of Beatles members to the article List of members of bands featuring members of the Beatles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Many other similar redirects to the same target, including , are also being discussed in the same place. Thryduulf (talk) 18:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:List of Beatles members]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists.  This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted-in to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: B-checklist in project template

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Revolver (Beatles album)#Requested move 29 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Revolver (Beatles album)#Requested move 29 February 2024]] 

message: Hi, I hope this is not an insensitive thing to bring up, but should we maybe mention that Ono and Lennon named and registered their dead sons in 1968 and 1969? Her article refer to one miscarriage in 1968 but technically speaking this child would have been stillborn (or according to this book by Tim Riley the boy actually lived for a little while, not sure where he's getting that info from tho). John's article mentions three miscarriages but the boy miscarried or stillborn in 1969 seems to have been registered and named as well. ★Trekker (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoko and John's children 

message: Should the page be put under this project, given that some of the singles are Beatles-related? Blueskiesdry (talk) 17:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Even then this WikiProject as a whole is practically dead so it wouldn't matter much anyways. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If it’s dead should we add a semi-inactive/inactive template? Blueskiesdry (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

text: I'd gladly use this page if anyone else is still interested.★Trekker (talk) 06:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I do think there’s still a lot to be done. A couple years ago we tried to get all the albums to GA/FA but it fizzled out due to lack of motivation. Blueskiesdry (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bummer. I'm not so familiar with album articles but I do like to do work on biographies.★Trekker (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter and Gordon discography
Template talk:User Denmark

message: Hi. I have taken the liberty to insert an image that depicts a flag superimpsed on (or rather: in the shape of) an outline map, since this gives double "visual recognizeability", as it were. Who prefers which version? //Big Adamsky 01:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The new looks fine to me. --Valentinian (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, there is a standard. See Template:User Hong Kong, Template:User South Africa, and Template:User USA. Páll (Die pienk olifant) 19:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not much of a standard. Germany, Spain, and Ireland all use a map. To me it looks like people use a map, if they haven't got anything better. Valentinian (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag + map
Talk:Nicanor (Seleucid general)

message: I'd like to overhaul all the Nicanors on Wikipedia. I plan to incorporate all the articles on the seventeen Nicanors from Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology; please see Talk:Nicanor for details. My plan is to do it this weekend.
Most or all articles, including this one, need re-naming: a glance at Talk:Nicanor will make it clear why -- "Nicanor of Macedon"/"Macedonia" etc. is just not specific enough for the sheer number of Nicanors that are out there. Feedback appreciated.
In this specific case, there do not seem to me to be adequate grounds for regarding this figure as Syrian by origin, so I'm inclined to go with a non-national article name.
I have also with this edit removed the  tag, as this Nicanor lived in the 2nd century BCE.
Cheers, Petrouchka 12:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal
Talk:Jean-Pierre Amougou Belinga

message: Jeanpierreamougoubelinga (talk) 07:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

message: Seemed like the subject edited the page. There weren't many significant changes after that, thus the year+ revert. This page in general might be a candidate for deletion (not sure how to nominate that) (talk) Noblet97 (talk) 18:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to 2 February 2019
Talk:Japanese archipelago

message: Stop adding this unsourced tag everywhere. Specify the sentence, tag the sentence, add the tag from that position. Not all of these sentences are unsourced. 75.70.142.23 (talk) 08:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop adding unsourced tags everywhere

message: Though they're politically part of Russia, are either Sakhalin or the Kuril Islands or both considered part of the Japanese archipelago in a geographic sense?108.207.39.63 (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question - geographical features are not limited by political boundaries. Does anyone have an answer? William Harris •  talk •   10:30, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sakhalin & the Kuril Islands 

message: I think that the map used at the beginning of the article (the one labeled "Japanese archipelago shown in dark green") should be changed. The article talks about how Sakhalin and the undisputed Kuril Islands are also considered to be a part of the Japanese archipelago, despite being a part of the Russian Federation. However, the map used only shows the Japanese islands under Japanese control, as well as Japan's disputed claim over the southern Kuril Islands.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fernsong (talk • contribs) 23:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the article map
Talk:Duck confit

message: A couple of paragraphs of this article appear to be a direct copy from .  It is unclear who copied from whom.  -- RoySmith (talk) 04:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: That photo of duck confit is so sad, should someone simply remove it? Loadedonloaded (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Fernandez warrior

message: The Fernandez warrior's relationship with Carrie is unclear, and has not really been clarified by Konami. She is called her cousin and stepmother in official sources, although the former seems unlikely as Actrise implies it took a great length of time for the curse to take hold. (Note that Rosa is still able to resist the curse even though she's been watering those roses or quite a bit of time.) The idea that she's her stepmother is logically impossible, as Carrie's step mother was not a Fernandez (her true mother was). Some fan sites list her as Carrie's true mother; this is impossible because Carrie's back-story describes how she saw her mother killed by a mob. It's most likely that Actrise simply uses the word "cousin" to mean "relative." Guermantes 01:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Carrie
Talk:Brockage

message: This article should probably be merged with the "Mint-made errors" article. As far as I know, there are no other independent articles of Mint error coins. The rest are all separate sections in the main article. No reason for Brockage then to be an exception. Patriot62371 (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, as the current WP:SUMMARY format is fine; there are separate pages for other mint errors, like Doubled die, Die-deterioration doubling, Wavy steps and trails and Die defect. Klbrain (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No reason for this to be an independent article
Talk:Stack-Up

message: Okay, let's call this the first draft of the final format. I don't think anything important is missing. If anything, some boring redundancies need to be trimmed. I'm also going to take a bigger, better picture of R.O.B. soon, and maybe replace the screenshot with one of Memory mode, which I think is the real bread and butter of the game.Phil Bond 15:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Garry McDonald

message: The entry here says born in Syndey but a newspaper article suggests Wollongong. I know the character Norman Gunston is from Wollongong. Any ideas about McDonald? Or references? http://newsstore.fairfax.com.au/apps/viewDocument.ac?page=1&sy=nstore&kw=norman+gunston&pb=all_ffx&dt=selectRange&dr=entire&so=relevance&sf=text&sf=headline&rc=10&rm=200&sp=nrm&clsPage=1&docID=news990518_0556_8312 KansaiDan (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 
Talk:List of poor law unions in Dorset

message: This page sould be called Dorset unions--Light current 01:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But not by copy-and-paste moving as that destroys the editing history - please read Help:Moving a page. You should use the "move" button instead! I have undone your changes. However now that target page has an editing history you have to use Wikipedia:Requested moves. andy 17:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dorset Unions
Template talk:Glasgow stations

message: I've done a bit of work on the contents of this template as previously it couldn't seem to decide if it actually was Railway stations in Glasgow, or if it was trying to be Railway stations in the SPT area, and in the end it was neither. As a result, I've deleted a few stations outwith the city boundaries (e.g. on the Neilston, Newton and Milngavie lines) and added a few which despite being actually in Glasgow and having Wikipedia articles weren't included on the template, including several on the Paisley Canal and Barrhead lines.
As an extension of this work I've also been removing the template on a whole host of other pages where it was appearing (i.e. those for stations which I've removed from the template). I've also shifted several of these from :Category:Railway stations in Glasgow to the categories for the approriate areas.
Of course, if anyone wants to change this template into one covering the whole SPT network - which might be a reasonable idea given the listing here of all the suburban lines and their colour codes, any thoughts?? - then they would all have to be added again, plus a whole bunch more! -- Jellyman 07:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few changes 

message: Anybody have any objections to me adding some stations to the disused section of the template? Crow Road railway station for instance has a page and is in the Glasgow area yet isn't in the template. I mean I know the criteria might be that the station must still physically exist, but if that were the case then a few others would fail on it. Plus there are still remnants of the station remaining, which I'll try to get photos of. There's a few others that could be added as well such as Partick West railway station. It just seems a bit incomplete to me, and I don't think you can ever really have too much information. 
If nobody objects, I'll do it. Of course, anyone else who would rather do it is more than welcome. --Notorious Biggles 17:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - however there are probably other closed Glasgow station that are missing. Fell free to add them. Stewart 19:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add missing stations? 

message: This template is somewhat redundant, in that it almost exactly replicates the rail part of Template:Transport in Glasgow. I was tempted to recommend it for deletion, but then I thought that an alternative approach could be to cut down on the amount of rail information presented in the transport navbox. Any preferences? Jellyman (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication
Talk:Game Ka Na Ba?

message: This article needs a lot of cleanup. Considering that the Kapamilya Deal or No Deal is at par with the other Deal or No Deal articles, this article pales in comparison. This article is written in a less-formal language, and sometimes rambles.
I also have problems with the "Kris Aquinoisms" (now renamed "Catchphrases") because of its significance. It isn't something that I would expect from an encyclopedia, and I don't see how this list will be relevant in five, ten years' time. I'll see if it can be rewritten to be more encyclopedic (with sources, of course); if not, I will delete it myself. --- Tito Pao
: Can you guys look for a picture of Kris Aquino at the set of Game KNB? It's awkward that the article is about PGKNB yet her photo is at the set of Kapamilya, Deal or No Deal. John earlm 16:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had to remove it since it's not fair use here. Also, the article needs to be edited: there are wikilinks where there shouldn't be one, bad formatting, etc. --Howard the Duck 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged for cleanup 

message: I'm "taking the controls" here. Search me up some sources and all that with better explanations to assist me and I'll do what I can on my own. Heck this article is even worse than Wowowee, and it doesn't take a puck with 2 numbers inside it to show you why this article needs better treatment too! XD
So, Wikipedya, CLEANUP KNB?! ViperSnake151 02:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And cause you wanted a cleanup... 

message: The dance, which originated on this show, has apparently caught on with the BBC: 
--Geopgeop (T) 00:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papaya Dance 

message: There are actually 9 clue words to 9 different questions, not 3 for both.  Only, the 9 are group into threes with corresponding point (or cash, perhaps?) values.  I had them edited just now.  121.54.110.2 (talk) 14:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  '3' to '9'
Talk:District of Columbia Olympic Committee

message: This article should probably be a redirect to a new article called DC Olympic Committee. Eivind 01:58, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Wars series

message: How can we fix the colors?  The top is gray when it should be red; even though the hex code is set to the light red.  Whazzup with that? -- gakon5 02:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I think we should get rid of the "Units in Advance Wars" in the template. There's already "Units in Nintendo wars Series"! It hasn't even been created! Steve 22:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Units in Advance Wars was AFD'd (and deleted), along with Units in Nintendo Wars, but apparently NW survived. -- gakon5 22:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units in Advance Wars  

message: The Nintendo Wars template that you guys are using right now just isn't right. It redirects three differente links to the same page, and has a unnecessary size. It's just stupid to let it as it is. You can check the changelog for the version I updated. It's MUCH better.
And, next time you guys send me a threatening message, please sign it properly, 'cause I can't complain to your IP ^^ Shiggy 17:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remodeling the Template

message: I understand that there's an obvious connection between Famicom Wars games and Advance Wars games (re: Japanese title for Advance Wars games), but the Game Boy Advance was called the Game Boy Advance; not the Famicom Portable Advance. English titles take precedence over other languages on the English Wikipedia, unless I'm wrong.
As for Game Boy Wars, that series is more similar to Nectaris than Famicom Wars to begin with. So what is it doing in the "main series" list? Should there even be a "main series" list? Elm-39 (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are 4 series, it should be acknowledged as such
Talk:Florida State Road 688

message: Just wondering if the 595 shield should be in the infobox, seeing as it's one of those pesky "hidden" routes? - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 23:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually really not hidden, just not as signed as it should be.  You see signs for it sporatically through Clearwater, near Holiday, but down in St. Pete, it's well known.  Up to you, though, if you think it's signed enough. EaglesFanInTampa (formerly Jimbo) 23:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll defer to "the man on the spot". ;-) I haven't been on ALT 19 south of Clearwater in [u]years[/u], so you'd know better than I would. - Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 00:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SR 595 