lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Here Come the Double Deckers!

message: Concur eith proposal to merge --195.92.40.49 10:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Probably not appropriate for the main article due to WP:Copyvio, but here are the lyrics (from memory, first verse only):
:Climb aboard Climb aboard Climb aboard with the Double Deckers Fun and laughter Is what we're after On a double-decker London bus.
— Loadmaster 15:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme song 

message: Only 17 out of planned 26 were made. Why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.2.34.156 (talk) 14:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so few episodes? 

message: Why is the show described as a "British" children's series?  It was made for ABC, it was filmed in the American video format, it was (at least partly) financed by an American company, its running-length was tailored to American schedules, and it first aired on American TV.  The BBC later picked it up but they bought lots of other American TV series.  Obviously this one was deemed especially suitable because it had a mainly British cast and was set in London, but that didn't make it a British programme.  GDBarry (talk) 09:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Britain sells Burberry and Duchy biscuits to America, that doesn't make them American.  This was a British show, made by Century Films, set in Britain with a British cast and British themes (A "double decker" isn't some sort of burger). The only American in there was a cameo role, as some exotic creature from across the seas. Selling it to the US, and US financial support for making it, doesn't change this. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "British" series?
Talk:The Removalists

message: In your opinion what does the costuming say about each character
Badunkie lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.107.10.31 (talk) 04:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that the plot currently given is insufficient in detail and lacking in some aspects such as closer to the end of the play. It could do with a more detailed approach. Also, I, through my own interpretations believe that the section about Kenny arriving home drunk is incorrect. He seems perfectly sober.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.148.200 (talk) 06:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Accuracy and Level of Detail
Talk:Bad Timing

message: When does the film features Pachelbel's Canon? I can't place it ...Hektor 11:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have the capacity (or the dvd) to list the items on the soundtrack? or to put more detail about the soundtrack issues?  SatuSuro 09:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtrack

message: It should be mentionned that Jim O'Rourke's 1997 album Bad Timing is named after this movie (two other O'Rourke albums are named after movies by Roeg)
142.157.192.104 (talk) 02:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim O'Rourke album 

message: Set in the future? That's not my memory of it.Costesseyboy (talk) 20:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Post-Cold War"
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-12-05/In the news

message: I've notified the BBC, along with several other news sites, of various errors in their articles. One site seemed to be implying that users had to log in to edit the wiki at all. (But then that site actually spelt 'Wikipedia' wrong throughout the article when the Seigenthaler story broke, so it was quite accurate by their standards) -- Gurch 11:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Marissa Faireborn

message: Hey Chris, maybe you could mention the Botcon 2004 in the article to put doubting minds at rest? And if you have a weblink to a story confirming Marissa Faireborn's heritage, it would be even better.
ese loco  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.236.169 (talk) 05:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Botcon
Talk:No Pussyfooting

message: I'm not shure if this clarifies anything, but the discography at enoweb lists the album as (No Pussyfooting). As with the other albums here, the artist names are separeted from the album title with a colon but the title is still in parenthesizes. Also the artists are credited as Robert Fripp / Brian Eno rather than Fripp & Eno as appears on the album cover. Justin Foote 02:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not wanting to harp on about this, but we currently have an article where the cover image of the album clearly shows (No Pussyfutting) as being in parentheses, but no mention is made of this anywhere else in the article. Which is a bit daft, IMO--feline1 (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I saw that too. Most discographies on the web seem to label it either as (No Pussyfooting) or simply No Pussyfooting. I was just trying to add more information to it recently without getting to specific about titles like that. I've never heard it titled "Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting)" as it was before though...perhaps we should add something to the frontpage labeled "No Pussyfooting (sometimes refered to as (No Pussyfooting) is a..." or vice-versa. How's that?Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But it calls *itself* "(No Pussyfooting)"! How can the album have its own name wrong? :)--feline1 (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree, i'll get back to it when I'm feeling more wiki-savvy to have it referred to as (No Pussyfooting). But I think it is noteworthy in the intro paragraph to maybe have a sentance saying it's sometimes refered to simply No Pussyfooting without the brackets, because it is in several prints! Either way, I agree it should be refered to as (No Pussyfooting) in the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  (No Pussyfooting) 

message: I don't want to get into a edit war over this but the title of this recording is (No Pussyfooting)
. Fripp & Eno are the artists. Calling it Fripp & Eno (No Pussyfooting) is like calling the second Beatles album The Beatles With The Beatles.
BTLizard 18:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no need to get into an edit war, because I am correct and you are wrong :-D  In all seriousness: the title is "Fripp & Eno (no pussyfooting)". This is a little play on words, meaning "Fripp and Eno (no mucking about wasting time)", referring to their spontaneous working methods. It is probably best said in a Cockney accent ;-) If you take off the "Fripp & Eno" bit, then there is no reason for the brackets to be there - you've broken the pun.  To use your example, it would be like saying the Beatles record's title was "With", by The Beatles. Clearing this would be ludicrous: the title of that album is "With the Beatles" - it is a little phrase in itself, which doesn't work unless "The Beatles" is in it - remove it and you just get "With". You see? --feline1 18:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  (No Pussyfooting)
Talk:Hawkeye and the Last of the Mohicans

message: I don't understand this statement: "The Indians were more realistically portrayed too, as an intelligent people with good and bad cheesecakes among them."  Does this mean actual cheesecakes or is cheesecake here a euphemism for something?  Please explain.  Thanks. 72.79.64.46 (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was vandalism. I've reverted it. Thanks for spotting it! ➲ redvers The 456 16:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Unitary urbanism

message: 'Nuff said.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.195.131 (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be translated into English 
Talk:Keith Windschuttle

message: Macleay Press doesn't seem notable apart from its connection to Windschuttle. I propose merging and redirecting to this article. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. For an article that's existed for 12 years, it has gone nowhere on its own. HiLo48 (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Now defunct. Paul foord (talk) 09:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Macleay Press into this article? 

message: This section seems to be overly long, and most of the sources in it are now dead links which makes it very hard to verify. In explaining the thesis of the book it also seems to result in sentences that seem inappropriately worded for Wikipedia and partly unclear if they are facts or Windschuttles opinions. One example "In Western Australia, the majority of the children who are claimed to have been removed and placed in state Aboriginal settlements, in fact went to those settlements with their destitute parents." appears without reference and unclear how substantiated this claim is, but could be read as independent fact as opposed to a claim made in the book. I would like to clean up this section but I can tell this is a contentious area, so I don't want to clean up too much if there is consensus for the current version of this section? Dauwenkust (talk) 00:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the section is way too long and spends most of its time evaluating the text, rather than describing it. This whole article seems to be an attempt to evaluate whether he is racist or not, which is misguided. The article should follow standard biography style. Which would include mentions of accusations of racism, of course, but not attempt to engage in an evaluation of its merits. Ashmoo (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, Volume Three, The Stolen Generations 1881–2008 

message: This is a BLP violation because 1) it exaggerates a negative claim far beyond its prevalence in reliable sources and 2) it presents a contested opinion in wikivoice. A more neutral phrasing is "Windschuttle argues that genocide is not an accurate characterization of the colonization of Australia", but that's already obvious from reading the lead. (t · c) buidhe 18:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable label in the first sentence
Talk:Hans Nieland

message: My special thanks go to Mrs. Hoppe, staff member of the Stadtarchiv Dresden, because Hans Nieland's biography is almost unkown today. It would have been nearly impossible, for instance, to find out the correct Christian names ("Hans Heinrich", but he just used his first name "Hans" solely) and his exact obit without her help. Nieland seemed to vanish successfully into thin air after he served a sentence in British post-war internment camps in Northern Gerrmany ...and this term of imprisonment is already quite hard to detect. Some (commercial) Dresden web pages assert misleadingly that his first name was "Hermann" ( or ) this very day and unfortunately the official City of Dresden homepage
gives as yet no information at all about previous Lord Mayors. There are just 20 scanty pages about his life in Vol. No. 7 of the Dresdner Geschichtsbuch (part of a historical research series edited by the Stadtgeschichtliche Museen Dresden). Historian Christel Hermann wrote a chapter about "Hans Nieland, Lord Mayor of the City of Dresden, and deputy Rudolf Kluge" (pp. 181-200). You couldn't find any reliable information about Nieland in the internet until now. Even his place and date of death had been a closed book. Some web sources insist absolutely, Nieland would be "missing since 1945". He still lived on for 31 years indeed. --Bogart99 12:16, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gladys Bouvier

message: If she is the sister of Jackie Bouvier (For whom Bouvier is her married name) her last name should not be Bouvier... This should be noted, perhaps?
But how do we know Bouvier is her married name, she might have kept her maiden name, and also named her childeren Bouvier, as they do with the Halliwells in Charmed
:: Since Marge, Selma & Patty's father is named Clancy Bouvier, that's why. --Ninevah 13:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gaviota Tunnel

message: Is this really a stub? I mean, how much more can be said of it?
Having said that, I used to love traveling through this tunnel as a kid. I'd always roll down the window and should something out...of course, wind noise drowned out the echo. Nowadays, I find it much more convenient to use the San Marcos Pass... cluth 12:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, maybe I could add something about that to the article (bypassing via the San Marcos Pass, not yelling out into the tunnel...) cluth 12:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Detentions following the September 11 attacks

message: The names of the people referenced that are linked do not work. When the link is clicked, it proceeds to allow you to create a new Wiki page for these people. If someone is trying to find out more about these specific people, they may have a hard time. 
The article is neutral in giving information. It is clear and concise and does not show any biases towards different cultures or ethnicities. For the different people it talks about, it gives a brief summary on what happened to them and it allows for the researcher to get a broad understanding, but there is definitely more research and sources that can be added into the Wiki pages. It seems as if the person added their own research, rather than facts already given from other websites or sources.
MoeTaha (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation of the article.
Talk:List of cricket grounds in Australia

message: I suggest that grounds that have held ODI matches (such as the handful that were used during the World Cup) and maybe those which have been used for list A matches be included in the list. Seeing as there aren't really all that many grounds around, it doesn't make much sense to make a separate list for ODIs, but they're certainly important enough to warrant a mention. --Omdal 12:25, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ODI grounds 

message: I must confess to being a bit confused by the usage of this information on this page. We have, for example, the Sydney Cricket Ground first used in 1877-78 and last used in 2010-11, while Sydney Cricket Ground No. 2 being first used in 1966-67 with no information of when it was last used.  This implies that it is still in use which contradicts the information re the SCG.  Might it not be better if a ground is still in use, or at least scheduled to be used in the near future, that its "last used" column be left blank.  If a ground has not been used for some time, say 5-10 years then the "last used" column can contain the correct information.  If a ground was used once then I see no problem with the "first used" and "last used" columns containing the same date. Leaving the "last used" column blank for current grounds also circumvents the need to keep updating the page with a new year every year. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Used Column 

message: All grounds used in women's international matches should be put in bold Playlet (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Women's internationals
Talk:North York Civic Centre

message: * The former city hall was never renamed "North York City Centre", although it is connected to a mall with that name.  City Centre was the name of North York's entire downtown district, with the city hall at its centre.   The school board offices, although in close proximity, are not part of the same complex.  Skeezix1000 12:39, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Guitar Vader

message: Started over to get this out of stub class. Wrote a proper bio. Could probably use some more eyes and a little more organization, and I definitely need to reference it better, but at least it's something resembling a real article now. Frogacuda (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Total rewrite

message: In Guitar Vader's official myspace, There was a post by Steve saying Ujuan's health has been improving. I can't link to it here because the site is being "Blacklisted".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.21.64.142 (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ujuan's health 

message: Guitar Vader has also released some songs on some other albums. They released 'Docu-mentary Kiss' on an album titled "New Chappie" and they released two other songs on a V.A. album titled 'Next from Stage 2000'. These songs can not be found on any other albums. They also helped out with a song by japanese artist Makoto Kawamoto called 'Gimmishelter'. If someone would like to add this info to the main article be my guest. More info should just be a Google search away.
Also, I've got a yucky feeling that the band's site is officially kaput.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.39.179.59 (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some other stuff 
Talk:Lowell system

message: At the very end of the article, it says, "mill owners began to seek cheaper labor in German immigrants. By the 1850s, the Lowell system had been abandoned."
However, I have a textbook that says it was Irish immigrants.  So I'll change this until someone finds a more reliable/specific statement. Sp3z1aL 02:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German vs. Irish immigrants? 

message: To maximize profits, it was in the best interest of Lowell's financiers to keep Lowell free of the filth, poverty, and social disorder prevalent in English factory towns.
This seems a bit POV (or at least inconsistent); I don't see how keeping the workers out of poverty has anything to do with profitability for the company. If anything, elevating the workers from poverty would interfere with company profits. If Faragher explains, maybe go into more detail or even provide a quote.
The bit about the newsletter (started in 1840, after the "trouble" cited in ¶4) seems out of place in the third paragraph; what has it to do with international acclaim?
For that matter, the fourth paragraph seems to contradict ¶s 2 and 3. If the workers were so happy and their conditions so great, why did they strike and form associations? (Especially women, who at the time were taking a unique risk in so doing.) — Scartol • Talk 13:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? Contradictory info?
Talk:Multilingual User Interface

message: I have heard that the Windows Vista Ultimate Edition will also include the MUI. Can somebody confirm that information? --ALE! 13:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On XP (Office) Language Packs are not MUI - they are just language packs, more-or-less equivilant to changing the Windows interface language from the language bar, but for Office, instead of Windows. Is this different on Vista? Does Vista still have a language bar? Also, Microsoft said that MUI is not available on Vista: is there a new name? Is MUI for Vista called a language pack now?  It still possible to get old style (office)language packs for Office 2007 (ie things that more-or-less only change the display language of Office).   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.18.240 (talk) 01:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

message: I'm not at all sure what this article is even trying to say! It seems contradictory.
"Functionally, Microsoft MUIs perform the same task as localized versions of Windows and Office. File and folder names are translated in localized versions, but not in the MUIs."
and
"That is, MUIs do not contain translated registry entries, but localized versions do. This is useful if the user wishes to run a program that requires the English version of Windows, while having his Windows in another language.
Then they don't perform the same task do they??
"For example, while a localized version of Windows or Office would translate the folder names (Spanish Inicio instead of Windows Start) ..." 
Start is a folder name?
Could someone write this so it makes sense please? Candy 11:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory

message: Since LIP and MUI and two separate and distinct technologies which are often confused, I would propose not to merge. Later if the articles are expanded for each one, it'll create more confusion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.128.147.202 (talk) 08:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose not to merge
Talk:On the Town (musical)

message: Should this article explain what that is?
I linked to the Wikipedia article on Arthur Freed, which has a brief explanation of the "Freed Unit".
JeanColumbia 19:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Freed Unit?

message: The previous version's statement that the film On the Town was the first to use location shooting seems pretty far-fetched (what about Nanook of the North?); it was at the time unusual to combine location and studio footage, especially in a musical, and I've updated the text to reflect that.
Robert 13:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location Shooting? 

message: Is a high school production really notable? Because if it is, we'll have hundreds of these paragraphs on pages like Oklahoma!, Annie Get Your Gun, Fiddler on the Roof, etc. (Incidentally, "flawless performances" is a biased statement). I've removed the paragraph. Keppa 03:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  High school 

message: This list is extremely misleading, as it includes the show's songs, songs written for the film that are never used in stage revivals, and one song cut from the show, all without any identification to warn the reader that this is a composite list. I recommend breaking it up into separate lists or using parenthetical IDs. Fred Lane 18:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Numbers 

message: Is it known why the Bernstein songs were dropped for the film?  Having recently seen the ENO revival and the film it doesn't make sense to me. TheOneOnTheLeft (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Numbers 2 

message: The plot added on Sept 6, 2011 is a cut-and-paste from the Tams-Witmark "Synopsis" at , and appears to be a copy violation. I have reverted to the earlier good version. See WP:COPY for the Wikipedia policy. Also note (directly under the edit page): "Please do not copy and paste from copyrighted websites –only public domain resources can be copied without permission." JeanColumbia (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Applied Drama

message: Applied Drama
Applied Drama is an umbrella term for the wider use of drama practice in a specific social context and environment. This practice doesn't have to take place in a conventional theatre space. It can be shared with, or created for, a specific audience, making them the starting point and the driving force for what is often a personal based exploration.
Applied Drama can be a therapeutic medium, using narrative and both real or imagined story as a tool to examine shared experiences through a dramatic framework. It uses symbols and role play to allow us a point of entry into the 'self', and as a vehicle for exploring the relationship between knowledge and action.
What the audience perceives and contributes categorises the very nature of Applied Drama, for example, Theatre in Education (TIE), Drama in Education (DIE), Community Drama and Prison Theatre. It requires the participants to be willing, truthful and honest, tapping into feelings to provoke responses and sometimes to encourage change.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mbalfour"
----
Can people please learn the difference between teaching drama, drama itself and Applied Drama, which is a very specific type of dramatic practice, before adding useless information to this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.57.39 (talk) 22:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Origin of drama 102.89.47.139 (talk) 16:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cca