lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yang Tae-young

message: "Some gymnastics analysts noted that while Yang's Start Value was incorrect, the judges had also missed the fact that he performed four static holds in his routine. Under the Code of Points, this infraction was supposed to incur a mandatory .2 deduction. If Yang's SV had been correct and the deduction had been taken, he still would have finished out of first place. The FIG has never taken an official position on this analysis. [4]"
Who cares what SOME analysts have to say. Can I also include my opinion in the article then? The most important thing is what MOST analysts believe and what the position of the FIG is. Also, the opinion of these analysts is presented as a fact, as if all these other experts don't know what they are talking about or willfully ignore this "fact". Perhaps the FIG doesn't know about these accusations or just doesn't agree and finds them to ridiculous to comment on. Also if none of the key players in this affair has commented on these accusations, it doesn't belong in this article. I you still really want to incorporate it in the article, it should be parafrased in a more objective way, like "some experts believe (who are these experts anyway?) Yang deserved a mandatory .2 deduction". 
"The situation was further complicated by the fact that Hamm, the first place winner, performed after Yang, which allowed Hamm to perform a routine that was calculated to put him in first place based on Yang's score. If Yang had scored higher, Hamm would presumably have attempted a more difficult, higher-scoring routine in an effort to surpass Yang's score."
These paragraph also bothers me, because how can one be able to predict what would have happened if circumstances had been different. This also seems to be the opinion of the author, for there's no source cited and the text doesn't seem to indicate that Hamm (or anybody else) has claimed this. 
But what I'm really complaining about is the fact I'm not able to remove these paragraphs. That's why this article has a very serious POV problem. Please comment! (213.10.46.8 (talk) 10:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please let me remove the specified paragraphs OR give a (satisfying) reply!(213.10.46.8 (talk) 12:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Yang Ti-liang

message: Which flag should be displayed in the infobox for Shanghai? I changed it to the PRC flag because Shanghai is presently part of the People's Republic of China but this was reverted shortly afterwards to the ROC flag without any edit summary. Is the ROC flag being used because this was correct for the year 1929? Thanks. --DTGHYUKLPOQWMNB 21:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be the PRC (People's Republic of China) flag not the ROC flag.  It was probably a common mistake.Misterx2000 (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yang was born in ROC's Shanghai in 1929. PRC was found in 1949, which was 20 years after his birth.--218.103.209.164 (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag icon in infobox

message: Would someone like to correct this, either by creating the articles, linking to existing articles or removing the wikilinks?  Thanks.Misterx2000 (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Many red links
Talk:Hatmehit

message: Since this article was a stub, I decided to write a new article. I utilized as much as I could of the original article, however to get a comprehensive look and to improve readability, I did change the layout substantially. In terms of sources, I mainly relied on the current Mendes excavations by the Redfords, Mendes II by de Meulenaere and MacKay, and the Mittelman 2006 dissertation. That being said, I made sure to research everything being cited as far back as I could. This was intended to get rid of the telephone effect of sources being cited in sources in sources, with differing interpretations down the line.
One portion of the article I decided to research extensively was the Connections with other gods section. I was able to find a significant information regarding Isis, a single source from antiquity regarding Nephthys, however when it came to Hathor I ran into some difficulties. The references I found that cited Hatmehit as a form of Hathor relied on material from Dendera, specifically in volumes I and II. Unfortunately, when looked in context and read thoroughly, these two locations specifically refer to Isis. However, it is interesting to note that in Dendera temple Hathor and Isis are presented in a way that intersects and overlaps. There are even portions of the temple where a composite Isis-Hathor or Hathor-Isis is attested. However, with these specific citations I can't in good conscience state that it is a fact that they were connected in antiquity. I can see it as a possibility, certainly. I just don't have any evidence I would feel comfortable citing. For this reason, I very specifically worded that section to reflect what some Egyptologists have stated without pulling in further evidence from particular locales.
I may be back soon with additional edits to the article, but as I have been working on it for quite a while at this point and it is pretty much done, I have decided to upload it. There are some very minor citations that I was unable to get my hands on in a reasonable amount of time. However, the rest of everything I cited I do have on hand, so if anyone has any questions I am happy to answer. Mendesian (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes on 11-15-2021 Rewrite
Talk:Yang Wei (gymnast)

message: My apologies -- I can't seem to get the references figured out.  The two references should point to this source: http://gymnastics.about.com/od/athletestowatch/p/YangWei.htm but I can't seem to make that work. (Gymexpert (talk) 03:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussion without headers
Talk:Hatshepsut problem

message: Unless anyone objects, I'm going to recommend this article for a merge or redirect to Hatshepsut. This article is a stub that doesn't say anything that isn't already said in the main article.  --Managerpants (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As you stated, the article says nothing that that isn't already in Hatshepsut -- no need to merge this article into it. The information in this article is redundant and nothing would be lost by deleting it. A link to the site exists already at the article on Hatshepsut and the author states, I hope this site is helpful to you in your studies. I truly was fascinated with the story of Hatshepsut, and I worked hard to ensure the accuracy of the information found on this site. However, I am not an Egyptology scholar. This site should be used as an additional resource to primary and/or published research. 
The dilemma has been resolved -- and information to dispel it shown to have been readily available among the writings of ancient historians -- seems unnecessary to perpetuate it.  83d40m (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Deletion is fine with me. I'm new to this whole process, and I didn't want to ruffle any feathers. :-)  --Managerpants (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Agreed. And thanks for the advice! Much appreciated.  --Managerpants (talk) 01:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No need to merge, delete
Talk:Yang Yang (speed skater, born 1977)

message: Yang Yang (A) and Yang Yang (S) are written in different way in simplified Chinese characters. Isn't it weird? Is it correct??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.114.243.128 (talk) 14:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You ever wonder why the surname and given name(s), all "Yang", are also written in different Chinese characters? Timmyshin (talk) 18:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Hawara

message: There is an Arab town right outside of Nablus (Shchem), in middle Samaria, on the way to Tapuach.  It is also called Hawara.  Perhaps a note could be added here about that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.198.36.54 (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a section about the kings burial chamber based on a book by I.E.S. Edwards. He refers to the chamber as being 22 feet long by 8 feet wide by 6 feet high. He doesn't refer to this as the interior of the chamber however it must be since otherwise it would not weigh 110 tons and there wouldn't be enough room. If it is the interior and the walls are just over 2 feet deep then it adds up. I cited 2 additional sources to support it since there appeared to be a minor mistake. 
Zacherystaylor (talk) 05:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  burial chamber 

message: only two reliable sources. There are more recent ones, I'll have a go when I get time. Doug Weller talk 08:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date and poorly sourced
Talk:Tristimulus value

message: We are merely duplicating the CIE 1931 color space article. Should we redirect this one to that, or move that one here? I say the latter; the XYZ article is getting pretty long, and tristimulus value is deserving of its own article since it is not directly tied to one color space.--Adoniscik (talk). 19:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The parts relevant to XYZ should definitely stay there.  That article (CIE 1931 color space) should probably be generally rewritten to be more accessible to non-expert readers, and to flow more smoothly, but none of its current sections should be moved elsewhere, in my opinion. --jacobolus (t) 20:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I definitely oppose the proposal to merge the section from there to here.  I'd prefer merging this article, which isn't much but a definition, into the other. Dicklyon (talk) 01:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

text: If we do not merge them, what can be discussed here that is not already in CIE article?--Adoniscik (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - Please do not remove a section entitled "Definition of the CIE XYZ color space" from an article entitled "CIE 1931 color space". The section describes the very foundation of the CIE color space and as such, it is specific to that space. A general tristimulus page could refer to that as a particular example, perhaps. PAR (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Looking at the current state of the tristimulus page I think it would be better if we simply made a subsection for it in the CIE 1931 article and redirected it there. The tristimulus page is a shell of a stub!--Adoniscik (talk) 17:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Make a section, and make this a redirect to it. Dicklyon (talk) 18:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text:   Adoniscik(t, c) 04:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Teal (color)

message: Um...What research backs your claim that Men think of teal as a green and women think of it as a blue? That seems like an unresearched assertion to me, not something based on fact. Can someone cite this? Or else, get rid of it? 68.193.53.233 23:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WRITE AN ARTICLE ABOUT A COLOUR WITHOUT THE COLOUR ITSELF? IS IT JUST ME OR IS THAT JUST RIDICULOUS?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.144.11.50 (talk) 08:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WHERE IS THE COLOUR?!?!

message: An IP added something to the extent that some "scientists" doubt the etymology of the color name. I've given this a fact template.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 16:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duck origins

message: Can someone include places in nature where the color teal is found?  I have only found two such places.--Beezer137 (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found in nature? 

message: There ought to be a mention of the infrequent use of teal as a name. Coral's got the mention why doesn't its complement? I ask this because my name is Teal, and I have read of other people named Teal, although it's uncommon. Still, I would appreciate the mention. I would add it myself, but i wanted to ask permission. 24.12.166.210 (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teal in culture 

message: The article starts with
"Teal is a medium blue-green color, although it is more blue than green"
but the RGB representation given is (0, 128, 128) - meaning there's exactly as much blue as green in it
So, how is it finally? 93.97.12.228 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this. It might be related to the human eye, which perceives green in more shades. But I don't think it perceives green as brighter. Changing it until proven wrong. 85.122.63.98 (talk) 13:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More green or blue?
Talk:Tangerine (color)

message: I will be changing the spelling back to 'colors' later unless there is justification of 'colours' as a 'term of art' in relation to British football teams.  If it is not a term of art in that regard, then WP:ENGVAR dictates the spelling to be 'color'. VMS Mosaic (talk) 00:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of color

message: Do we know of a hex Code for this colour? 78.145.240.24 (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's F28500. --2.245.234.161 (talk) 12:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hex Color

message: Anyone realized that the fruit tangerine is colored orange and vice versa? i find that weird. 6BHcomputerwiki (talk) 15:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orange and Tangerine
Talk:Tan (color)

message: The infobox is missing, I tried to edit it, but I don't know how yet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.176.221.185 (talk) 05:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color infobox 

message: The first sentence says that tan is a brownish brown. This seems, redundant.
"Tan is a pale brownish, tawny shade of brown"
Daedalus733 (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brownish Brown? 

message: The correct hex for Tan is CC8454 and Dark Tan's hex is 483730 so please don't change them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.182.193.102 (talk) 04:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case the shade of fan used in the lead image box is cited to the X11 color space, which gives the value D2B48C, so that is what is used. More importantly, you haven't cited your source at all, and instead keep insisting on changing sourced data to unsourced data against the sources and consensus. Please stop. oknazevad (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Right Hexs' 

message: It can be argued that parapsychology can be legitimately included as a part of human culture; however, considering that this is a pseduo-scientific field where most claims can be disregarded entirely, and that the area of colors is not one with a more than trivial cultural impact, I would vote against it. If it is included, a formulation should be used that clearly indicates that we merely have a cultural reference, not a potentially valid claim. In addition, going by the formulation and the one weak source, I suspect that the discussed claim is not a consensus view even within parapsychology.
I note that the overall awareness, cultural impact, and consensus on e.g. star signs and the associated (but still arbitrary and scientifically unsupported) characteristics is far greater (in the Western world) and that the case for including discussions of colors and parapsychology is far weaker than for star signs (in the respectively relevant articles).
The above obviously applies to any other color-related articles.
80.226.24.6 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tan in human culture / parapsychology 

message: I believe this page was hacked, in the info box specifically.  It lists "shades of shades of black people" on the bottom and it lists "skin color, loafer" in the middle.  I hope you can fix it.  Thanks.  24.113.51.121 (talk) 21:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Shade of black people" 

message: Dark tan is not the main entry in the info box about tan, it is simply listed as a variation, with no sourcing for the attributes and no text discussion of the color.
If it is a real color, it deserves more discussion.
I don't plan to edit this article as my current focus is on the color lists articles (e.g. List_of_colors:_A–F). I do plan to remove this entry from that list, but if someone does some research and can can find evidence that there is a color by this name, it can be restored.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark tan
Talk:Yann Arthus-Bertrand

message: How do you pronounce his name? Mårten Berglund (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  French pronunciation: jan artys bɛrtrɑ̃ (see Internation phonetic alphabet)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:45F4:F876:17BF:D701 (talk) 12:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I've been trying to edit this page many times now, a lot of the information on this page is either missing or wrong, espcially about his NGO, the GoodPlanet Foundation or his work as a movie director and book writer.
All the referenced changes I have suggested have been turned down when they are actually righ. How can I get in touch with someone about this? Thanks (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Try asking at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Since you're affiliated with GoodPlanet per Google, I can't really consider you neutral on this topic. Graham87 15:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information 

message: MOS:POSTNOM "When the subject of an article has received honours or appointments issued either by the subject's state of citizenship or residence, or by a widely recognized organization that reliable sources regularly associate with the subject, post-nominal letters may be included in the lead section." For post-nominal letters to be included in the lead section the honor must come from the subject's state of citizenship or residence, or the subject must be regularly associated with the organization. 1) This subject was not born in Scotland and is not a resident or citizen of Scotland. 2) This subject is not regularly associated with the Royal Scottish Geographical Society. The post-nominal letters FRSGS do not belong in this lead. Jerry Stockton (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-nominal letters
Talk:Hemen

message: Please refer to original reference (AnnekeBart edit)
and current reference -  see below p.68 Petrie  Drift chambers (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The original reference is a perfectly good citation I think. The website I used as a reference quotes a reliable publication from 1954: Henri Wild, Statue de Hor-Néfer au Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lausanne, BIFAO 54 (1954) pp.173-222. The other reference are old texts from 1905 and 1938 by Petrie or citing Petrie? I changed the references a bit to better explain the citation and restored the original one. There is no reason to remove it. --AB (talk) 15:38, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit 20/09/2011 
Talk:Henry Hall (Egyptologist)

message: The Oxford Dictionayr of National Biography for Hentry Hall seems to imply his name was actually Reginald Holland Hall as they give his name as Hall, Reginald Holland [Harry]. Also It seems his father is unknown (his father was not registered), and the man often given as his father was simply the man his mother later married. Also his mother was Emma Holland according to the ODNB.
I would edit this but the only reference I could give would be the ODNB online which is a subscription site.
Molybdomancer 14:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxford Dictionayr of National Biography entry for this man
Talk:Henry Salt (Egyptologist)

message: My partner and I have done a lot of work in adding more information to the biography portion of the page and have created new sections to make it more specific. We've got a lot of it sourced which was a problem with the original information on the page; that it was missing a lot of sourcing. We have incorporated most of the information on here into our changes and made sure it had sources to go with it. We do not mean to make it look like we are changing everything, but we figured changes were needed to improve the page. Let me know if you have any questions.Alex C Stansbery (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes
Talk:Heracleopolis Magna

message: Would it be more accurate to say that Heracleopolis Magna is in Lower Egypt, not Upper Egypt? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: We now have a separate article on Ihnasya, but its talk page redirected here.  I've created a second talk page for now.  Is it helpful to keep both articles, or should they be merged? Certes (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone had moved this article to Ihnasya back in September, and I just undid the move, creating a redirect from Ihnasya (and its talk page) to here. That person then created the new Ihnasya article by overwriting the redirect page, and there was no activity on its talk page, so the talk page remained a redirect. Since there is a modern town in Egypt named Ihnasya (or Ihnasya al Madinah), I see no reason to merge the articles—cf. Caesarea Maritima and Caesarea, Israel, or Sparta and Sparta, Laconia, articles about ancient and modern settlements at basically the same locations. Others may differ, however. Deor (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ihnasya
Talk:Herbert Eustis Winlock

message: His book Tutankhamun's Funeral... looks back at the extraordinary events in the Valley of the Kings in 1908 which he witnessed... [which] provided Howard Carter with key clues in his search for that pharaoh's tomb.
:What events? Valetude (talk) 02:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Events he witnessed
Talk:Yared Hagos

message: The name sounds Ethiopian or Eritrean, is that correct? If yes, the article should get a category for it. Punkmorten (talk) 15:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Hagos' parents are originally from Ethiopia. --claes (talk) 16:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  African? 
Talk:Yaroslav Korolev

message: "Korolev can speak English without the aid of an interpreter."
Wow... Experience maker (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal 