Talk:Timeline of United States inventions (after 1991)

message: Is this how radio works? Or is this “radio” something that does not yet exist? And probably will NEVER exist?.  How can you say that Tesla invented radio based on this?
This is preposterous!!!!!'''
Does wikipedia subscribe to this sort of unscientific gibberish claims? this is tanatmount to black magic....not radio!! User:Altes 2009 (talk)
Tesla's four tuned circuit system of transmission of electrical energy predates linear/nonlinear amplifying devices such as the triode vacuum tube which would be used in later designs as modulators and amplifiers, itself eventually supplanted by the transistor. Tesla's used his own coil design now called the Tesla Coil as a tuned resonant circuit that could produce high frequency high voltage signals suitable for transmission on an antenna. The fact that Tesla's design used primitive resonance circuitry does not make it an invalid design, one that he himself built, demonstrated, and patented. This sort of primitive radio was in use until about the 1920's.  Tesla's original transmitter design used earth ground as a reference potential for his resonating coils to build potential difference against. 
So to answer your question.
No it is not how a modern radio works, improvements have been made with modern amplifying technology, but it is how Tesla's radio worked. 
Yes that radio did exist, and was demonstrated.
Unless you have serious evidence that disputes the volume of wiki data and other evidence available  describing the four tuned circuit transmitter/receiver (Ref US Patent 645,576) and Tesla's demonstrations of wireless technology (Ref Wireless Energy Transfer) then I do not consider the content of this article in dispute. 
Mikethemoose (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I Dispute Tesla's Claim about the invention of radio

message: === Sourcing of the Claim about the Inventor of Blogging ===
The source given for the claim that Dr Glen Barry is the inventor of blogging is ActNow, a voluntary organization that encourages young people to become members and contribute articles, so somewhat equivalent to Wikipedia. ActNow's article does not specify the source of its information. I don't think ActNow is a suitably reputable and reliable source for the claim. In any case, the question of who invented blogging seems to be a subject of some controversy, partly due to the nebulous definition of a blog, and needs more lengthy discussion, such as occurs in three other Wikipedia articles: Blog, History of blogging and Online diary. Cimbalom (talk) 10:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: The source given for the claim that Dr Glen Barry is the inventor of blogging is ActNow, a voluntary organization that encourages young people to become members and contribute articles, so somewhat equivalent to Wikipedia. ActNow's article does not specify the source of its information. I don't think ActNow is a suitably reputable and reliable source for the claim. In any case, the question of who invented blogging seems to be a subject of some controversy, partly due to the nebulous definition of a blog, and needs more lengthy discussion, such as occurs in three other Wikipedia articles: Blog, History of blogging and Online diary. Cimbalom (talk) 10:31, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing of the Claim about the Inventor of Blogging 

message: The Global Positioning System is listed under 1993, when it achieved initial operational capability.  However, the nanowire battery is listed under 2007, even though a prototype has yet to be completed.  To be consistent, the Global Positioning System should then be listed under 1973, when, according to its article, "the real synthesis that became GPS was created."   Psalm 119:105 (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Global Positioning System

message: The image :File:Bionic contacts.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Bionic contacts.jpg

message: The Beech Starship, which has a wikipedia entry under that exact name, was first flown in August of 1983.  To suggest that the Boeing Dreamliner is the first is factually incorrect.  Obviously, this item should be pulled from the post 1991 section and placed in the prior section.Homebuilding (talk) 03:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Composite aircraft flying in 1983

message: I do not think that "trongs" are very representative of inventions in the U.S. As such I do not think they should be included in this article. They are not a major invention, nor are they well known at all. Reportingsjr (talk) 09:27, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trongs 

message: Any notable invention is already listed on its own page.  The set of inventions that are listed here are selected in some very odd way -- e.g. by somebody who liked Dean Kamen and somebody who liked Amy Smith.  These are not the most important inventions, they are not the most notable, they are not the ones that changed the world the most, they are merely whatever some partisan threw in here.  There is already a [Category:American inventions] that has an alphabetically ordered list of inventions by Americans, which has many hundreds of inventions in it.  Shouldn't this page be removed?   Gnuish (talk) 01:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page really worth having? 

message: Do "Doggles" belong with the CMOS Image Sensor, the mouse scroll wheel, and JavaScript? Seems like an advertisement to me. 2606:A000:1215:C280:20BC:6A6B:5479:F9FF (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doggles? 

message: Substituted at 05:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Timeline of United States inventions (after 1991). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612172252/http://www.pivotpins.com/catalog/bow_tie.shtml to http://www.pivotpins.com/catalog/bow_tie.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: About the invention since 2010.
There aren't nothing invention that invented since 2010. - 191.205.248.228 (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure about this? Nothings been invented in the US since 2010? Kitamura290 (talk) 19:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the invention since 2010.