Talk:Nordic Council

message: I'm not sure what "ranked 19th" and "ranked 45th" on these are for... It doesn't seem to be correct either, after following the links. I personally don't think this union should have a rank among individual countries anyway. -- Jugalator 02:29, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
:I hope it's okay that I removed those stated ranks. The ranks are just misleading, since other countries occupy those particular ranks. The lists are meant for single countries. But if there were to be lists of unions of countries ranked according to area and population, the Nordic Council could be ranked there then. Mad Greg 21:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Area + population ranks

message: This edit by Jmw0000 effectively undid a prior edit made by me. Jmw0000, your edit summary simply stated rv. vandalism. This inappropriate use of both the edit summary and the term vandalism irritates me. I strongly advise you not to use "vandalism" as an epithet, but only refer to an edit as such if it is beyond reasonable doubt that the edit in question does in fact constitute vandalism. I have now restored my prior edit, and will be keeping a watchful eye on this talk page to see if you are going to explain your grievances here or post any constructive suggestions for how the article might be improved. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 13:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason for it wasn't to attack you; my assumption was that user 151.188.16.40 vandalized the page, and I missed the continuance of the page at the bottom when I saw the edit.  I was following this user around and reverting his edits.  This was my error of not looking at either page closely.  For that I apologize.  I was simply not being a good editor. And chill, you're allowed to revert things without getting all uppity.  If you want to bother me again, try making it something important, rather than something borderline childish. J. M. 15:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted. Happy editing. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 16:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Jmw0000]]'s edit

message: Some sources (Laursen for example) suggest that it was Denmark that proposed the creation of the Nordic Economic Union (NORDEK) at the Nordic council session in 1968. If so, could we include this into the text? RedZebra 17:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NORDEK 

message: Please, mention or create an article about the Nordic Council's Film Prize. If it exists under another name, please, let me know. Hoverfish Talk 15:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nordic Council Film Prize--JBellis (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nordic Council's Film Prize 

message: This article has some overlap with Nordic Passport Union. --Apoc2400 11:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap 

message: What Scottish islands are the ones referred to, who have supposedly yet to take an interest in joining the Nordic Council? Surely such islands would not be able to join without the rest of Scotland and Britian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.175.133 (talk) 15:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would assume that is primarily a reference to Shetland and Orkney, both former Norwegian possessions. -- Nidator T / C 04:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scottish Islands? 

message: Both this article and the official website is a tad fuzzy on details. From what I gather looking through the website though, the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers are two separate bodies, the former being a parliamentary assembly (the fact it is composed of delegations of national MPs is unmentioned in this article) and the other being the intergovernmental forum referred to in the lead. We then also have a Nordic investment bank and a Nordic cultural fund that go unmentioned but what I can't find out is how all these institutions are linked, is there an umbrella organisation or are they largely independent, held together by solid Nordic reliability and common membership? Furthermore, there seems no mention of the autonomous territories as "associate" members, but rather they are shown as joining on certain dates but being included in the member totals of the main member states.
Can someone clarify all this? I'm utterly confused by this organisation. Is there a better source of data than the official site?- J.Logan`t: 11:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: {{tl|Nordic Council}}

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nordic Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150218024134/http://www.norden.org/webb/news/news.asp?lang=6&id=6795 to http://www.norden.org/webb/news/news.asp?id=6795&lang=6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: (Apologies if I'm doing this wrong, I'm new to editing).
Should the Baltic States be added to the map since they are Observers, maybe in a different colour?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emil2205 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are not members of the Nordic Council and not Nordic countries. --Bjerrebæk (talk) 00:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Where exactly in academic research does it say that being a member of The Nordic Council is a prerequisite of being defined as a "Nordic country"? Scandinavia, Norden, Nordic - those are three different words with three different meanings. See Nordic race for where the "nordic" term got started. The Scandinavian countries then later decided to unilaterally use that word for the Nordic Council in 1952. SørenKierkegaard (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, I don't see why observer countries shouldn't be added to the map, in a different color. It seems that would be an improvement. GeoEvan (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I agree with GeoEvan. And here's a direct reference in case any editor is doubting the existence of the observer status. SørenKierkegaard (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the observer states to the article based on this information, regardless of the status of the map. 2606:6000:6793:7500:9854:8D3:6B7D:1DBC (talk) 05:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

text:  EE-LV-LT have no formal standing in the Nordic Council. The NC ministers' offices in EE-LV-LT are more like embassies - in the sense that their existence does not signify membership in the organization. Hence the three countries should not be added to the map. Blomsterhagens (talk) 12:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania be added to the map? 

message: For the last year or so a single Estonian editor has tried to add excessive material pushing Estonian nationalist and fringe theories to articles related to the Nordic countries. He has managed to drown the talk page of virtually every single article related to the Nordic countries in endless, endless discussions about Estonia. The editor's attempts have been reverted and opposed and he has been called out for his disruption by probably a dozen or more editors, yet the editor persists. As seen above he has a long history of making personal attacks as well, and often falsely accuses other editors of being "xenophobic" merely for opposing the addition of fringe Estonian nationalist material to articles where the material doesn't belong (he has been called out by others for such false claims in the past as well). As we see above he also routinely tries to force editors to rehash the same old debates, ignores previous discussion and simply refuses to get the point.
We have already thoroughly debated whether Estonia holds "observer status" at the Nordic Council. The conlusion was that there is no evidence that such a formal observer status exists. Crucially, it isn't mentioned anywhere on the official website of the Nordic Council and Council of Ministers (I looked into this with an open mind, initially believing myself that the claim that Estonia held such status was correct). Instead sources were provided that demonstrated that observer status was in fact explicitly rejected.
Even if an observer status existed, it wouldn't belong in the section on members, in a way that portrayed the alleged "observers" (who aren't even observers) in a way that is visually almost indistinguishable from the actual members. We already have a section on cooperation with the Baltic states and other neighbouring countries and regions. That's where any mention of Estonia belongs. As it happens the article already includes an extensive discussion of the cooperation with Estonia and the other Baltic states. --Gaduse (talk) 05:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Gaduse, you have been in conflict with at least four different editors on these topics. This is not about a "single Estonian editor". Edit: The mention of an observer status does exist on the Norden site as well. Edit2: To the user with the address of " 2606:6000:6793:7500:CCCE:BA0B:AC24:EFF7" - please create a real Wiki account. You don't want to be accused of soapboxing later. Blomsterhagens (talk) 06:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not the website of the Nordic Council, but of a local office of the council of ministers in Estonia. It does also not demonstrate that they hold any formal observer status in the sense that warrants their addition to the members section (instead of the section about cooperation with neighbouring countries) and discussed here, merely that they participated as guests in an informal manner. It doesn't answer the question about "when and how" they were formally given an "observer status" that is similar to a membership. The Nordic Council has hosted guests from many other countries in the past, even from countries such as Canada and the US. Please provide a better source. And no, you are the editor who have "been in conflict" with at least a dozen editors over your attempt to make this article and others unduly focused on Estonia and your various theories. --Gaduse (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  "The Nordic Council has ministers' offices in Estonia, Latvia & Lithuania" ; There's also the Nordic-Baltic Eight framework. Both of these signify a more close cooperation between the region than between the nordics and Russia for example. I'll ask around about a formal observer status though to end these topics. If there's no formal member status then of course EE-LV-LT should not be added to the members section. I've never added them there either. I'm against your personal / insulting attacks mostly. For example I've never added EE-LV-LT as members on this page. This has been done by several other editors. What makes you claim they are estonian? Why not latvian or lithuanian or norwegian? And why is it important what country someone is from at all? Group identity has been discarded as a metric of personal value since at least the early 20th century. How is this still relevant to anything? Blomsterhagens (talk) 10:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Edit: I called the council’s office and according to the phone call, EE-LV-LT are not formal members of the nordic council. They are also not formal observers. They have no formal standing in the council. This concludes the topic on formal membership / formal observers for me. Countries that are not official members of the council should not be included in the members table or in the infobox. I have removed the NC local-lang lines for EE-LV-LT and Germany from the infobox as well. EE-LV-LT have, however, been informal observers on sessions each year. This is probably also the source of the confusion. I see nothing wrong with saying somewhere that EE-LV-LT have observed the sessions as informal observers. Blomsterhagens (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your constructive initiative. This is really what I have been saying all along, after I initially looked into the matter (at first believing them to hold official observer status myself). It's perfectly fine to include material about them being present as informal observers, and of course having a close cooperation with the Nordic Council. It's also correct that the Nordic Council since the 1990s has prioritized cooperation with these three states, and that the cooperation with e.g. Russia has a somewhat different format. --Gaduse (talk) 11:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

text: You are "merely someone" who has made no other edits, and who has come here merely to disruptively edit war and add a proven WP:HOAX to this article (that you knew to be a hoax, since you've apparently read the first discussion of it), and make ridiculous personal attacks in addition to your agenda-driven edits. Normally I don't engage with such editors, and you should consider yourself very lucky that you've not been blocked for your edits. Adding false information to Wikipedia articles is a serious matter. --Gaduse (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Noting the other content in this talk pag as well, I trust your information on the phone call, /* Blomsterhagens */ and will nonetheless follow how things evolve in decades to come. The sovereign state of Estonia isn't Nordic nor Scandinavian for that matter. To be one, is to be integrated into a Nordic state most likely. I doubt Baltic articles have nice-to-know mentions about Nordic involvement neither. ✌️ ToniTurunen (talk) 11:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Estonian POV pushing

message: The infobox currently has the Nordic Council names written in the majority national languages + Faroese. We should also add Greenlandic and Northern Sami. I don't know what the NC is called in those languages though. Blomsterhagens (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minority / regional languages on the infobox 

message: Hello. 
This article is currently an amalgamation of the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers. Wouldn't it be better to separate the information this article has on the Nordic Council of Ministers into its own article? The article on the Nordic Council of Ministers and this article can be summarized in a new article called Nordic Cooperation. This is the term that many involved with either the Nordic Council and Nordic Council of Ministers will use, however I realize that the term Nordic Council is popular in describing the leading institution of Nordic Cooperation.
I suggest that the information about the Nordic Council of Ministers be written in its own article, and also have an article about Nordic Cooperation which summarizes the articles on the Nordic Council and the Nordic Council of Ministers. 
As a result:
A new article will need to be created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nordic_Cooperation
Article page used for redirected would need to be completely overhauled: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nordic_Council_of_Ministers&action=edit
And this article will need some, perhaps large, editing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_Council
Johnwillem (talk) 11:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Restructuring Article, separating Nordic Council of Ministers and Introducing Nordic Cooperation.  

message: Given the impact of Brexit and a potential second Scottish independence referendum, should the relationship between the Scottish Government and the Nordic Council be mentioned in the article? A delegation from the Council has visited the Scottish parliament this year https://www.norden.org/en/news/scottish-parliament-seeks-closer-collaboration-nordic-council, and both sides are discussing the potential of future membership. http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/nyheter/news-2020/article.2020-11-30.0316939619 Culloty82 (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotland