Talk:Peter Sloterdijk

message: I was wondering if anyone knows of an english translation of his TV show? Or at least transcripts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.87.10.46 (talk) 19:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Show, Im Glasshaus: Das Philosposche Quartett 

message: Someone may want to double check, but this article is pretty much grammatically set.  One thing I need to check on is whether or not "instead" is a conjunctive adverb.  blah blah blah.--Smallwhitelight 22:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammar 

message: Article was heavily spammed by Adolfo Rocca or follower and Psikeba magazine.  All in Spanish.  These two have conflicts of interests all over wikipedia.  They should feel free to post on Spanish wikipedia.  Serious COI (Conflict of Interest) isssues here!  Suggest monitoring of page to make sure these characters don't come back. --Dylanfly 22:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SPAM by psikeba and Rocca

message: Is it a copy-paste job from somewhere?71.16.116.2 (talk) 00:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does the article editorialize so much?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Peter Sloterdijk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090215044256/http://alcor.concordia.ca/~gnosis/vol_vi/sloterdijk.html to http://alcor.concordia.ca/~gnosis/vol_vi/sloterdijk.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090817164037/http://www.cicero.de/97.php?ress_id=1&item=3888 to http://www.cicero.de/97.php?ress_id=1&item=3888
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100129172903/http://www.cicero.de/97.php?ress_id=6&item=4370 to http://www.cicero.de/97.php?ress_id=6&item=4370
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528042753/http://www.petersloterdijk.net/international/texts/en_texts/en_texts_PS_operable_man.html to http://www.petersloterdijk.net/international/texts/en_texts/en_texts_PS_operable_man.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150112023135/http://www.waterytimes.com/index1.php?no=1&location=N001C03&txt=N001C03T07 to http://www.waterytimes.com/index1.php?no=1&location=N001C03&txt=N001C03T07
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: From the article: 'Sloterdijk published the e-mail novel The Schelling Project.'
So, 'e-mail novel', I'm just checking what this means? Perhaps the entire narrative consists of mobile phone messages? My understanding is that Sloterdijk’s books vie with soccer-star memoirs on the German best-seller lists. I'm gleaning something here of the bawdy eroticism and farcical elements in the novel. Is it like Liasons dangereuses?
DanLanglois (talk) 05:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'email novel'? 

message: In September 2016, Sloterdijk published the e-mail novel The Schelling Project.Peter Sloterdijk, Das Schelling-Projekt (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2016) The semi-autobiographical text contains a self-portrait of the author, appearing as "Peer Sloterdijk"; several of Sloterdijk's friends such as Thomas Macho, Siegfried Mauser and Michaela Boenke figure in the novel in slight disguise. Together, so the plot goes, they draft a research proposal to the German Research Funding Agency (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) on the evolution of the female orgasm. To make it look more profound and thus to impress the reviewers, the team fakes a connection of the issue to the metaphysics of the German idealist philosopher Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling.
The reviewers, though, see through the mystification and turn down the application. Following the rejection, the team splits and each of its members takes his or her own course. While Sloterdijk's e-mail novel about an academic hoax was rated mediocre in terms of literary quality,Jens Jessen in DIE ZEIT no. 37, 1 September 2016, p. 39. Sloterdijk fails to develop different voices for his characters, notes Stefan Kister in Stuttgarter Zeitung, 15 September 2016. it came to be seen more as a political statement,Cf. Frédéric Valin in Der Freitag no. 39 (26 September 2016): "It's obvious: The Schelling Project has not even been intended as a novel; it has been launched as sheer act of provocation." ("Es liegt auf der Hand: Das Schelling-Projekt ist nicht als Roman konzipiert, es ist vielmehr als Provokation gedacht.") specifically as an attack on gender mainstreaming in 21st century Germany.Sloterdijk sees its foundation in the feminist presentation of women as "victims" ("Opfergetue"), analyzes Jens Jessen in DIE ZEIT no. 37, 1 September 2016, p. 39. Critic Elke Schmitter, in a review article for Der Spiegel under the heading 'Woman as an Old Boys' Joke',Elke Schmitter, 'Die Frau als Herrenwitz', Der Spiegel, 1 September 2016. Male fantasies of women "dripping wet like a gravel lorry" ("tropfte [...] schon wie ein Kieslaster") when men come even near them are no substitute for literary imagination, Schmitter suggests. described Sloterdijk's text as an anti-feminist pamphlet thinly veiled as a novel.A similar point is made by Stefanie Lohaus in DIE ZEIT, 23 September 2016 In an interview with Süddeutsche Zeitung Sloterdijk defended himself against the charges and claimed his attitude towards women to be adoration rather than contempt.Vera Schroeder/David Pfeifer/Sven Michaelsen, 'Peter Sloterdijk im SZ-Gespräch', Süddeutsche Zeitung, 17 September 2016 Biohistorian15 (talk) 12:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex and feminism (former entry)