lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Luis Patti

message: In which force did Patti serve? Policía Bonaerense or Policía Federal Argentina? I think he was a Bonaerense, but not sure. This should be in the article. Mariano(t/c) 06:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Police
Talk:El Teatro Campesino

message: Should the definitve article "El" be in this entry's title? – Morganfitzp 21:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not particularly, though certainly there should be a redirect so that looking for either will find the article. (And there has been, for half a year.) - Jmabel | Talk 18:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it probably should be El Teatro Campesino as that's what the article text mentions throughout. It doesn't matter how long the article has been listed under its present title, if it's not right the article should be moved.--Lord Kinbote 18:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ¿El?
Talk:Gronk (artist)

message: It may be worth noting that 'gronk' is an insult / perjorative slang term used in Australia, New Zealand and England. 211.30.80.121 04:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Insult
Talk:Alas Smith and Jones

message: The show ran for 10 seasons until 1998, not for 4 until 1988, cf.  I haven't got time to change it right now, but somebody else might have? --Thf1977 06:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it “Alas Smith and Jones” or “Alas Smith & Jones”? The video covers here and on IMDB say “&” and the IMDB entry says “&”. If it is “&”, the Wikipedia article title should be changed. Felicity4711 (talk) 04:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  “And” or “&”?
Talk:Monkey butter

message: Monkey butter doesn't have many recipes online, because everyone who knows about it knows how to make it; you don't really need a recipe book to mix bananas, yoghurt and peanut butter.  I had heard the phrase and wondered what it meant, which is why I put this article up.  Now anyone who wonders what monkey butter is can look it up on Wikipedia.  I wouldn't mind if this were moved to wiktionary or merged into peanut butter, but a simple deletion is not the best answer. --Slashme (talk) 08:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed prod template

message: No mention of monkey butter is complete without a reference to jwz and his monkey butter anecdote (at http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/monkeybutter.html). --coldacid (talk|contrib) 22:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  jwz
Talk:History of Fayetteville, Tennessee

message: This can be added to Fayetteville, Tennessee as a new section, it does not need to be a separate article. --WillMak050389 16:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed -Ladybirdintheuk 14:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:VRT (broadcaster)

message: I added the English translation of the Dutch name because visitors of the English wiki might not understand the Dutch name. I used the name that the VRT uses on their website. (Flemish Radio and Television Network)
http://www.vrt.be/vrt_master/over/vrt_aboutvrt_activities/index.shtml
--Lamadude (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Any beligian people whom grew up on Tip en Tap too (which was produced by BRT) are more than welcome to come over and help add stuff to that article. Acidburn24m 20:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tip en Tap 

message: "This reorganisation changed the public broadcaster, since the TV monopoly and the creation of VTM, into a dynamic and powerful service that is currently (2009) the market leader." I'm a bit tired and hungry now and not sure I want to go into trying to change it into something better myself, but I can tell it's not really good. The "since" clause doesn't seem to fit in well grammatically (should "since" be "after"?) and "dynamic and powerful" is not neutral language. Ever wonder (talk) 17:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sentence in the lede 
Talk:Bells Are Ringing (musical)

message: On March 17, 2008, most of the Production section was deleted, with no explanation. Later that day, the entire Plot was deleted, again with no explanation. I am now restoring all of the deleted material, all of which appear to be good.JeanColumbia (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Yuka Honda

message: where her and sean really married?
RE: No.  They lived together in common law partnership for three years.  IMDb has this wrong.  There is no evidence anywhere else on the web for this marriage; it never happened.
128.226.219.107 20:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: "Honda is originally from Tokyo, Japan, but moved to New York City in the 1980s"
On Yuka Honda's Myspace she has photographs taken of her home town, and I am 100% sure it is not Tokyo, although she lived in Tokyo, she was not born there. -ChristopherMannMcKay 18:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Born?
Talk:Beyond the Fringe

message: The Wikipedia article for actor William Christopher (Fr. Mulcahy) states that he made his Broadway debut in Beyond the Fringe; does anyone know in what capacity? Was he a substitute cast member, like Paxton Whitehead, when the principle cast went back to Britain, or did they have understudies for the main cast during their run? I could see him being a plausible choice for the parts taken by Alan Bennett, but that is purely a guess. Jock123 (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting question! He was in a touring production along with Paxton Whitehead in fall 1963, before Whitehead went to Broadway, so I would assume he was brought in from the touring show just as Whitehead was. I would agree Alan Bennett is a plausible role for him; we know Whitehead "did" Miller, as far as I know Moore stuck with the show to the end of its run, and I can't see him as Cook. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

text: Looks to be confirmed by this interview: http://www.mesaartscenter.com/index.php/misc/about/press-room/inthenews/MASHchaplainconvertstoLutheranisminChurchBasementLadies - he mentions doing Bennett's "Take a Pew" solo spot. -- Walnuts go kapow (talk) 13:10, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Christopher 

message: Perhaps it does not belong in the article, but I was struck by the homage done to Beyond the Fringe in The Crown (TV series) Season 2 Episode 10. It's mentioned in this Telegraph review. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture? 

message: Does anyone have a source they can add for the claim that President Kennedy attended a show when it was in New York in February 1962? Js904258 (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Show
Talk:Billy Elliot the Musical/Archive 1

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 04:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: I removed some of the endless "news" information about cast comings and goings.  Wikipedia is not a newspager.  I also recommend removing the list of ensemble and ballet girls.  -- Ssilvers 21:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast info 

message: Any clues as to why this article currently is called "Billy Elliot (musical)" when the poster and the article lead paragraph calls the production "Billy Elliot The Musical". --Tagishsimon (talk)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagishsimon (talk • contribs) 09:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy Elliot The Musical - The name???
Talk:Take 6

message: Regarding getting a photo for the article... the website makes them seem receptive to contact. If there's a person of authority in the WP community that has an interest in this article, perhaps they'd like to email the Media Relations rep. I feel like they'll be more receptive to such a request than they would be from a faceless, lowly member of the community like myself. --SingCal 07:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo?

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect We Wish You a Merry Christmas (Take 6 album). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  TheSandDoctor Talk 04:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  We Wish You a Merry Christmas (Take 6 album) listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Hi there! To any and all interested: I've proposed a WikiProject dedicated to a cappella. This would be a group of editors interested in improving the quality of articles related to a cappella. If you're passionate about a cappella—ranging from the Pentatonix to groups like Take 6, or perhaps pop culture representations like Pitch Perfect and The Sing-Off—please check out the proposal and share your thoughts!
Here's a link to the proposal for WikiProject A Cappella.
If you could see yourself contributing to an article related to a cappella (like this one), please consider joining!
:—Shrinkydinks (talk) 20:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Comment: New WikiProject for A Cappella-related articles
Talk:Bitter Sweet (operetta)

message: I assessed this as "Start" class and removed an "analysis" section that contained an entirely unreferenced discussion of what Coward might have meant by the word "gay" in the show and had a paragraph about the 1940 film (which has its own article) that was not relevant to the operetta.  This article needs a history/background section and a critical response section, for starters.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: With the new Background section, critical response section, improved referencing and other new information, I'd say the article is now a strong C-class article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:List of dialing codes in Japan

message: I see that this list had not been updated since 2006, but quite a few cities had merged since and many districts had disappeared due to villages and townships becoming cities or being absorbed into another city. Maybe it's time to update this list.
Amythewillowprincess (talk) 17:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated city names 

message: I noticed that other than 011 there are no geographical dialling codes with a '1' as the second digit. If I understand it correctly, there are also no non-geographic dialling codes that use this (other than those with a '0' as the fourth digit, i.e., 0x10). Is there a reason why 0x1 was mostly left out? SmilingBoy (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no 0x1 area codes except 011?
Talk:Levocarnitine

message: In my opinion merging the two will be counter productive.
Levocarnitine is what it is and nothing you or I can do can change that. L-Carnitine is a consumer and health supplement that is found in shops around the world under that name. As a consumer I would not have come to look for 'Levocarnitine' I came and looked for L-carnitine, if this was not there I would have clicked away and looked elsewere. Furthermore, I come to Wikipedia to obtain facts (of a kind) that steer me in the right direction. By merging Levocartinine  with L-cartinine you would simply have given what sounds like a pharmacuetical drug precident over a fundamental amino-acid that is critical in some instances.It is my submission that the facts of its biochemical nature must be preserved and not merged with a levocarnitine which at first blush sounds like a pharmacuetical drug. --
I agree.  They are different. -- Freebytes
: A simple redirect takes care of the problem of "not finding" L-carnitine. If it's essentially calling the same thing by two different names, which seems to be the case. I agree that no information should be lost in a merge - "the facts about it's biochemical nature must be preserved".   My vote is for merging. Intersofia 22:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of xxxHolic episodes

message: Would it be okay to remove this? It looks pretty clear that season 2 is finished at only 13 episodes since it stopped airing during the summer. I could understand if this is a reference to an upcoming third season but in that case this tag should be at the top of the article, not at the top of the season 2 section because season 2 is completed. Tyciol (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . The summaries really should be expanded though. --Eruhildo (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete list tag?

message: This list contains almost no information beyond the very basics. Honestly, I think I'm being generous giving it start.じんない 21:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. The synopses are just teasers and totally inadequate, violating NOT PLOT, which requires that the plot be adequately described. DGG (talk) 08:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  assement downgrade 

message: I'm considering updating the episode summaries. Does anyone know if the existing short ones are original, copies from xxxholic.wikia or copies from somewhere else? Also any reason why some summaries are excessively long?
Ozflashman (talk) 10:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea. I think I wrote the two Ro episodes only which means they must be full of typos. Alzó, I would recommend you using the Code Geass or Buzo Renkin lists as modelos since they are FLs.Tintor2 (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Summaries 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :No return and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 9#No return until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  1234qwer1234qwer4 14:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No return" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Boys from Syracuse

message: I added some info and upgraded to "Start", but just barely.  -- Ssilvers 05:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The article is coming along.  It needs a more substantial plot summary, and the list of roles should be slimmed down to eliminate some of the less important ones.  It also needs a "Reception" section.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Next steps

message: The plot added on Feb 19, 2012 is a cut-and-paste from [guidetomusicaltheatre.com]. This is most likely a copyright violation and I am deleting this plot (and returning to the earlier plot) and advsing the editor. See "Please do not copy and paste from copyrighted websites – only public domain resources can be copied without permission" and WP:COPY for Wikipedia copyright policies.Flami72 (talk) 10:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Acklam Grange School

message: Removing contact details harms the utility of this entry. Removing the name of the Headteacher is also contrary to normal practice. There is no basis for removing things from this entry that might be useful to someone consulting it. BlueValour 07:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contact Details 

message: I've just removed a couple of questionable alumni from the list - one person listed as having won the "I AM A TWAT" prize, another for being a champion of some video game. Also, the last few entries on the alumni list are not in alphabetical order. I would have fixed it but I'm not at all certain they're actually notable enough to be included in the list in the first place. Help?
Thanks, Jessicapierce 15:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Crap, never mind, please ignore. I've posted this to the wrong page - I meant Adams' Grammar School. Disregard. Jessicapierce 15:05, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mild vandalism to alumni list, and question
Talk:Apostolic Palace

message: I'm surprised that this page doesn't even tell when the palace was built. Given that this is such an important building, being featured in a Civ4 expansion and all, I do hope that someone informed on the issue will improve the article. -- D64 (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added Civ4:BTS reference. Stalwart111 (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, when I added the comment above, I think the BTS reference was there - but there was scant other information on this building, which was the inspiration for my sarcasm. I'm happy to see that since my bitching the article has been notably improved. -- D64 (talk) 13:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surprising scarcity of information 

message: A lot of work is needed for this page, it doesn't even speak about what the palace was used for. This is a very important building, I expected a lot more information. I will try to add more information to this. Hopefully, others will join me. Warrior4321talkContribs 16:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added more information - hope this helps. Stalwart111 (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much work needed 
Talk:Guerrilla (film)

message: This NYT Cannes screening review lists the title as Che.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/movies/23cann.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin
Comrade pat (talk) 22:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just the title for the special screening of both films at Cannes. Afterwards, they will be split up into 2 films.--J.D. (talk) 23:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct title is "Che"? 

message: Redthoreau (talk)RT 20:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Damiens quote deletion
Talk:Waterfowl

message: As discussed at Talk:Anseriformes, Waterfowl is the common name for Anatidae.  Currently "waterbirds" redirects to Anatidae, but the term "waterbirds" is actually much broader in normal usage, and should be broken out rather than redirect there.  However, Waterfowl is normally generally synonymous with the Order Anatidae, so the two articles should merge to the common term.  I will remove references to "waterbirds" in the article.  Due to the the incorrect redirect for "waterbirds" double-redirects will probably be many, but we have to deal with that if we're going to make things right.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 01:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Best to keep all the discussion at Talk:Anseriformes rather than repeat here Jimfbleak 12:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger

message: I am requesting the addition of a taxobox here, on behalf of Coo coo pigeon because she is tired.  Thank you. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 05:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxobox request
Talk:Dressing (medicine)

message: I reverted the edit regarding the importance of maintaining a sterile field. This is not always necessary - see current guidance on dressing chronic leg ulcers in the community, for example . Plasters (band aids if you're north american!) are also dressings, and nobody applies them under sterile conditions, do they? --John24601 04:56, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sterile field 

message: I have added some stuff about modern dressings (dressings these days are rarely cloth), and will add a bunch more stuff about dressings and dressings performance in the near future.
Pete Phillips 13:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern dressings 

message: My old pharmacology text, Goodman and Gilman's 6th edition, page 971 covers the use of acetic acid as an antiseptic.  It states, "It is occasionally used in 1% solution on the skin for surgical dressings." "Pseudomonas aeruginosa is particularly susceptible to acetic acid, and the acid may be employed in burn therapy."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.78.76.206 (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgical Dressings using 1% Acetic Acid, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 

message: The WP article 
History of wound care 
is stub-class, but does offer some value.  See also its talk page.  
If consolidated with this dressing article, the consolidated article might be superior to either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdnctx (talk • contribs) 14:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidate with WP article, '''"History of wound care"'''? 

message: An article that you have been involved in editing—Dressing (medical)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.  Etan J. Tal(talk) 17:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger discussion for [[Dressing (medical)]]
Talk:Can-Can (musical)

message: The article now has production info and a critical response section, but no plot summary!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a brief plot, could use more; I believe that this article is no longer a stub, evaluation is needed.JeanColumbia (talk) 13:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: Mark, this is definitely not a C-class article.  It is barely a "start".  The plot summary needs to be much expanded, and there is very little background or analysis.  The article has all the information that you can copy in from IBDB, but that is like saying a sandwich with no meat but a beautiful bun and lots of lettuce, tomato and olives is a good sandwich.  Where's the beef?  -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment