lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Writing implement

message: Have the writing instrument(s) entries link to this page.
I have started listing Writing accessories at the bottom of the page - until there are enough to create a separate page (which might include other related items).
Can someone correct the film's name please?
Needs parallel translation to and from the German version. Jackiespeel 18:29, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I was really doubtful of one of the many claims make on this article that are unsourced. And I cannot find any evidence that Roman's abraded lead onto wood/papyrus to write with. See my History.SE thread. Wisnoskij (talk) 12:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Typically schoolroom slates were *not* used with chalk, except for very young children.  Chalk lines would have been far too crude/fat for older children to allow much work to be recorded.  "Slate pencils" were used - these were made of soft slate or a slate composite which left a greyish, pencil-thickness line on the (harder) slate which was being written on.  Usually such things wouldn't be worth mentioning, but this is about writing implements!176.251.188.26 (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  School use of slates
Talk:Malachi

message: Is Malachi a widely accepted title for the subject of this page? Because, according to the transliteration rules, it should be Malakhi (unless Malachi is 'official'). Please clarify this. --  Ynhockey (Talk) 09:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title

message: Note there are Bible references linked to a website "bibler.com" that no longer exists. https://www.mechon-mamre.org is still around though. Template:Bibleverse would be better as someone will maintain that if sites disappear. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibler

message: What did Malichi have to do with Lions? 2601:1C1:8380:16A0:E8DC:E233:1796:20C1 (talk) 10:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malichi 

message: Needs 20th and 21st century scholarship IncandescentBliss (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs lots of help
Talk:Bathtub curve

message: This was a very short article that did not seem to me to need a separate encyclopedia entry, so I redirected it to the more comprehensive failure rate article, which addresses the Bathtub curve.
--------------------------------------
The curve shown is not good: a typical bathtub has a steep decrease in the left side (the side where the bathtub has the drain hole), a longer horizontal low portion and a smooth rise at the other side.
Similar is the curve of the failure rate. I suggest to copy here the curve of the german or Esperanto version, which shows the affair better.--Hans W (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

message: It refers to something quite different: the ability to recall the start and end of a forgotten word (on the tip of one's tongue) — with reference to a person in a bath whose head and feet are alone visible. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bathtub effect" should not redirect here
Talk:All-Star Squadron

message: Should the Shining Knight's horse (Victory) really be considered a member? --joyboy 16:38, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Probably not...and I'm a big SK fan.  KHM03 20:13, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I can't find any information on this image, does anyone know what the source was? --Basique 12:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind it's Alan Davis. --Basique 14:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image credit

message: The fair use of :image:All-Star Squadron 1.jpg in this article is questionable. Listed below is/are the reason(s) for this:
The list section this image is used in conjunction with is Creators. The image does not add in any way to the section, nor does it illustrate, in whole or in part, the people that worked on the stories published during the comics run. It only serves as decoration as it is currently used.
It is also redundant in illustrating the comic book series, the types of characters, and the scope of characters in light of the image used in the infobox.
If the above concern(s) can be addressed in light of the relevant policies and/or guidelines, the image use can be retained. If not, the image needs to be removed from the article.
- J Greb (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the image as decoration. - J Greb (talk) 01:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free image use
Talk:Morris Oxford

message: Wot no pics? Where is Arpingstone when you need him??? :)
:Bless you for your most appreciated commendation. Sadly, although I have around 700 car pics that I've taken at car shows various, I've not got a Morris Oxford. Best Wishes from Adrian - Adrian Pingstone 20:47, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I could be wrong but weren't all the Continental engined cars actually Cowleys and not Oxfords? Malcolma 20:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Has anyone else noticed that there is a break in the flow of Morrises in 1935. They restart in 1948. The cars concerned are covered nowhere in Wikipedia except (some of them) by red links. Their names might be 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 25 split into series I, II, and III I suspect. There are matching Wolseleys, in fact I think this might be exactly when Wolseleys ceased to be quite distinct and became badge engineered Morrises.Get an idea of what's involved from these links (the lists are certainly incomplete) Morrises and Wolseleys, Eddaido (talk) 11:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There would seem to be plenty of scope for additional pages on Austin models from that era, although grouping the models logically would be a challenge. The Michael Sedgwick / Mark Gillies "A-Z of cars of the 1930s" would be a good place to start. GTHO (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought there was little co-operation between Austin and Morris at this period. Eddaido (talk) 11:12, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I did mean to type "Morris", not "Austin". Silly mistake. GTHO (talk) 09:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morris models missing 

message: Would it be better if this article was split up into:
* Morris Oxford bullnose and flatnose
* Morris Oxford 6 cylinders
* Morris Oxford 1948-1971 (or series I to VI) (or post WWII)
or:
* Morris Oxford before 1945
* Morris Oxford after 1945
Your thoughts please. Eddaido (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Armando Dippet

message: I've started off this article but as you can see it is very basic and needs a lot of work. - Jamandell (d69)
This article should be merged with Minor Hogwarts teachers, Historical characters or Minor Harry Potter characters. Dippet is of little importance in the series, and his article is shorter than other merged characters like Dean Thomas, Andromeda Tonks or Pansy Parkinson. Lord Opeth 21:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree? This is an incredibly minor character, and not worth their own article. 203.221.19.217 11:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Family (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

message: It is unclear why Buffy can't see Spike. Since he is only half-demon, the same rules should apply as to Tara: Demon part hidden, human part visible.
About the last line, is clarification really necessary? After all, Spike's chip ability prevents harm to only pure blood humans so the spell might as well work similarly. it's proven at the end that Tara isn't a demon so I'll remove the unnecessary reference to her. Ekarderif 03:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing and Acting 

message: "We find out that Riley has a dark secret."
I'm watching through these for the first time myself, and I didn't notice anything dark or secretive from Riley in either the episode itself or the summary, unless you count a possible drinking problem.  I sure wouldn't. 65.126.105.160 (talk) 07:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dark Secret?
Talk:Pearly gates

message: It'd be nice to have an picture (or rather, an illustration) of how the gates are normally portrayed, if we can find one without copyright restrictions.  67.173.108.82 (talk) 16:32, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: What exactly is the justification for the inclusion of the BOM quote in this article? It looks life a piece of crypto-proselytising to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horse-Coachee (talk • contribs) 00:09, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book of Mormon quote
Talk:Hypothetical imperative

message: This article is off to a very good start. However, I would suggest that you make a section that include several examples of the hypothetical imperative. This would serve to give the reader a better idea of the term, beyond just what is explained in the overview. In addition, it seems as though you are not using the "Cite" button when writing, which would add a citation number directly behind whatever you are referencing. Because of this, it is unclear what exactly in your article you are referencing. In addition, I would add a little more background information about Kant, to give the readers insight into the credibility of this term and where it originates. Yannasummer (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was created in 2003. So hardly a new start article -- 65.94.169.56 (talk) 22:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Relief Society

message: I've added to this section. The RS tends to be an invisible charitable organiztion finding any honors or recognition has been difficult. Perhaps others will be able to find more than my single edition.
RyanNerd (talk) 07:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Recognition Section

message: Since the Relief Society started out in  Nauvoo with Emma Smith and she ended up with the RLDS church, dose anyone know if any other sect in the Latter Day Saint movement have their own Relief Society the same as the LDS Church.  If they do, I think it's worth mentioning them also.--- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 17:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relief Society in the General Latter Day Saint Movement 
Talk:High-definition video

message: I've archived all old discussions prior to 2017. Click the link above to revisit the archive. Rburriel (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is now in the talkheader section above. Ken Gallager (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 

message: where does this 'data' come from?
"The four major film formats provide pixel resolutions (calculated from pixels per millimeter) roughly as follows:
*Academy Sound (Sound movies before 1955): 15 mm × 21 mm (1.375) = 2,160 × 2,970
*Academy camera US Widescreen: 11 mm × 21 mm (1.85) = 1,605 × 2,970
*Current Anamorphic Panavision ("Scope"): 17.5 mm × 21 mm (2.39) = 2,485 × 2,970
*Super-35 for Anamorphic prints: 10 mm × 24 mm (2.39) = 1,420 × 3,390"
there is no citation provided for it, nor details of the film-stock which supposedly has this 'resolution', nor any mention of the differences in contrast handling, image-noise & so forth.
some evidence or it goes.
duncanrmi (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "HD in film-making" section 

message: I worked on this table a number of years ago, but it's rarely been updated since. I'm working on a larger project to merge together a number of existing pages and tables related to "video hosting services" (see the discussion). As with my comment (made in 2009) about our futile attempt to compile a comprehensive list of all movies "filmed in HD", it seems unwise to attempt to compile a list of all video hosting services and their parameters/features. As I proceed with my project, I'll be removing this table and linked to a page about video hosting services.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rburriel (talk • contribs) 17:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impending removal of the "World Wide Web HD resolutions" table 

message: 1080i has never been, nor considered, to be FULL HD. Only progressive 1080 is or has been. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.6.223.50 (talk) 06:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1080i, full? no
Talk:Small Block (EP)

message: I think that the vast majority of people searching for "small block" will be looking for the engine that this album is named after.  I think it would be a good idea to move this page to Small Block (album), redirect this page to the engine, and have a link at the top of the engine page to the album.  Are there any objections? TomTheHand 14:14, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection to the move, but I think this page should be turned into a disambiguation between the two, rather than a redirect to small-block. I'm not too sure the vast majority will be looking for the engine part. Robert 04:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the move.  I disagree pretty strongly about a disambiguation page; I really do think the vast majority of people will be looking for the engine.  Google shows 1.1 million hits for "small block" engine, 187,000 for "small block" v8, and only 526 for "small block" "big drill car".TomTheHand 14:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, fine with me. Robert 04:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Small Block (album)? 
Talk:FC Rostov

message: On the FC Rostov homepage the starting year is set to 1930 and the first name-change to 1932. This facts are different from the Wiki-articles 1900!1913.
http://www.fc-rostov.ru/club/club_story
83.233.21.85 (talk) 12:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting year
Talk:Moreauville, Louisiana

message: Trying to find out if Lenny or Mary Gauthier are still around?  Lenny was in the Air Force in the 70's, His dad owned a business in Moreauville.   Any info would be nice.  Ty 2601:404:C000:D6F:72DE:E0E2:D257:B7F9 (talk) 13:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old friends
Talk:Drinkware

message: "Glassware is a subset of drinkware made from glass." is clearly inaccurate, since glass bowls, plates, pitchers/jugs, decanters, etc, are all commonly referred to as glassware.
Ids135 17:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glassware is NOT a subset of drinkware 

message: Are we trying to make a list of all the common glasses, or just a "sample" of them? Because there are many other glasses I would like to add JayKeaton 20:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  comprehensive 

message: "Drinkware" is not a useful term or category.  I just added to the Glassware article, making it more consistent with the definition of Tableware and other related articles.  I recommend this page be deleted, or retitled and limited to "Barware". Mukrkrgsj 10:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Glassware, or retitle "Barware"

message: I think that the absinthe glass should be added in under glassware, it is distinctive and interesting  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.226.27 (talk) 22:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absinthe Glass 

message: Shouldn't glass (Glass (drinkware)) be in a separate article to this? There's already a Drinkware category, and it's possible to make a page called 'List of drinkware'.--Jcvamp (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Considering the dearth of beerware we have represented in the drinkware sidebar, I feel as though stemmed wine crystal should be differentiated rather than simply dealt with categorically as forms of 'wine glasses.'  It is just as anathema (perhaps considerably more so) for the wine connoisseur to drink fine Burgundy from a white wine glass as it would be for the beer enthusiast to drink pilsner from a Belgian glass.  Show me the man who puts his DRC in a generic 'wine-glass' and I'll show you a man with more money than good taste.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.78.170 (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer vs. Wine glassware
Talk:Mordechai Vanunu/Archive 1

message: I deleted the following paragraph:
:Advocates for Vanunu's freedom feel Israel will be safe only when it pursues nuclear disarmament of all nations including itself. They feel a sane leader would not pollute the Earth with such weapons. They oppose all nuclear weapons on prinicple for the benefit of humanity.
Last two sentences are simply some of the arguments of those opposing nuclear weapons (in general). I think if we had Vanunu's own arguments for nuclear disarmament, they'd belong here, but the fact that some (and I can tell you not all) of the advocates for Vanunu's freedom support his cause and use those specific arguments seems besides the point of the article. Timtzeptel 19:03, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argument for nuclear disarmament 

message: Is this a pun? This act singlehandedly changed Israel's standard procedures for transporting prisoners, to prevent it from happening again. And even if it's not, ought it to be removed as it's a little, well... Angmering 11:25, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the (unintentional?) pun too, but personally I think it should remain.  Gave me a little chuckle in an otherwise serious (and well-written) article. - biggins 00:05, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: On a lighter note...

message: I wrote an additional paragraph towards the top with some updated information, and someone took the text and integrated it VERY well into the previous paragraph. At first I didn't know why someone removed the text, and only then did I realize they did a very nice job at editing it and making it flow with the previous text.
Thanks to whoever did that!
security 16:09, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks to whoever corrected my paragraph 

message: Is this needed? Relavent?
::On February 5, 2004, former Mossad director Shabtai Shavit told Reuters that the option of killing Vanunu was considered in 1986 but "Jews don't do that to other Jews." [2] (http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1043340.htm) (Compare with: Forced disappearance).
The whole "forced disappearance" addition... just noticed it, thanks for your input. JoeHenzi 17:36, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assassination Option
Talk:Ealing Art College

message: When I attended Ealing College in the early '80's there was still a hole in the ceiling above the stage in the Student Union.  When I asked a mate if it was from rats, he told me that that was where Pete Townshend had smashed his guitar during a performance, and that no one had the desire to fix it.
Could be apocryphal, but the story impressed me.
JOHN LENNON
Are you certain Lennon went here? Can find no reference to that on the web. He attended Liverpool school of art. Then off to Hamburg with the Beatles and the rest is history. When would he have attended Ealing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.192.220 (talk) 06:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Albizia julibrissin

message: Thank you for a very informative history of the Persian Silk Tree.  I appreciated the links provided, which allowed me to confirm the Genus of my tree.  My tree is about 12 feet from the foundation of my house, but it is so beautiful I have left it to grow.  It was a spontaneous upstart. I was wondering if you had information on possible problems from root damage.
cpoloyni@sbcglobal.net
:I can only second that. A nice, well-rounded article it is. Brief, but covers all the essentials one could think of. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 14:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonderful article 

message: It might be a good idea to include a redirect/disambig/or just a link from the "mimosa" article to here.  I know i spent a good bit of time looking at the mimosa related articles trying to find this plant before I gave up and just googled "mimosa".  It's just really confusing since it's colliqualy called mimosa in the USA and it's also similar in apperance to the actual mimosas.  Good article, but no one's going to find it if they're looking for information on what we call here "mimosas".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.7.17.3 (talk) 20:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I recently uploaded some new images of an Albizia julibrissin, below. Feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 21:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photos 

message: In Farsi (Persian) گل ابریشم means Caesalpinia (cnf گل ابریشم on Persian Wikipedia), while the Turkish name for Albizia julibrissin is gülibrişim (cnf gülibrişim on Turkish Wikipedia). --Episcophagus (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farsi or Turkish? 
Talk:General Assistance

message: Are general assistance programs always entitlements, or do some states fund them on a discretionary basis? Boris B (talk) 03:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure.  In California our general assistance law is a confusing mess. Welfare and Institutions Code Section 17000 is as follows: "Every county and every city and county shall relieve and support all incompetent, poor, indigent persons, and those incapacitated by age, disease, or accident, lawfully resident therein, when such persons are not supported and relieved by their relatives or friends, by their own means, or by state hospitals or other state or private institutions."  But then if you read the sections immediately following that, it's clear that the Legislature has given the counties the discretion to specify a very low level of aid for indigent residents, since California had too many hippies flocking into the state in the 1960s and living off the public dole.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entitlement?
Talk:Cognitive neuropsychology

message: We have not yet covered the criticism of this approach. Because it is based on single case studies the models get more and more complicated. It is difficult to refute the studies. Also, as the models get more complex the heuristic and diagnostic value diminishes. (source: Psychology of language by Harley) ----Action potential  discuss contribs 02:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I think there is some work showing that double dissociations may arise from randomly removing X% of connections from a connectionist model, suggesting that double dissociations may not necessarily arise from the brain being modular.  I will see if I can find a reference (Macleod, Pinker and Plunkett rings a bell ...but could be wrong). Finereach (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of neuropsychological approach