lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard Warren

message: According to the following sources, Richard Warren, Mayflower pilgrim, was the son of Christopher Warren and Alice Webb, and that his wife's name was Elizabeth Marsh/Maych/Ivatt/Juatt. These sources further state that Richard Warren was descended from William de Warenne, 1st Earl of Surrey and Gundreda, who is listed as a daughter of William the Conqueror and Matilda of Flanders. 
*Leach Rixford, Elizabeth M. Families Directly Descended from All the Royal Families in Europe (495 to 1932): and Mayflower Descendants bound with Supplement. Burlington, Vt.: 1932. pp140-142
*Mackenzie, George Norbury, LL.B., and Nelson Osgood Rhoades. Colonial Families of the United States of America, Vol. VII. Baltimore: 1912. pp319-320, 347
*Koehler, Robert T. The Pedigree of Richard Warren of the Mayflower. Tampa, Fla.: 2020.
::Disclaimer: the Koehler source is my own work.
Rhythmnation2004 (talk) 13:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Warren's ancestry and the identity of his wife 

message: Someone included a link from the "Anne", one of the early ships that came to Plymouth Plantation.  That's a good idea (if anyone will ever write an article on the Anne).  The question I have is: should the quotation marks be part of the link?  If not, then it links to "Anna", but if so, should Mayflower have quotes?
There are two articles on the Anne - The Anne and the Little James 1623 and Passengers of the Anne and the Little James 1623. Mugginsx (talk) 12:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to/from the "Anne" ? 

message: Some have Richard Warren as christened 24 Jan 1580 at St Peter Cornhil, London, England
and then his ancestors are given at this link
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=bevangenealogy&id=I31837
AND that line does carry one back to Charlemagne and Royal lines of William Conqueror.
Further note- the pontificating tone of the main article likely comes from lack of info. See above.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.202.166.157 (talk) 03:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestors of Richard Warren

message: On Sarah Palin's connection:
Ancestry.com was only printing the research results of three leading genealogical authorities: Tom Brown, William Reitwiesner, and Gary Boyd Roberts. All three researchers cited birth, death and census records, as permissible by law, pointing back to accepted printed earlier genealogies.
The material was compiled by Robert Battle and Michael Hurdle, and was extracted from Mr. Battle's webpages at http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~battle/palin.htm and http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~battle/heath.htm.
Extensive source documentation can be found on those webpages.
--Dranster (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestry
Talk:St. Louis blues (music)

message: Rolando 01:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Please see the discussion is taking place at Talk:St. Louis Blues (hockey)#Requested move BsroiaadnTalk 03:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Louis Blues

message: Muddy Waters is preeminently a Chicago blues musician. His name should be removed from the list in this article. Any objections to removing his name? Jwicklatz (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muddy Waters
Talk:Palestinians/Archive 2

message: The term Palestinian is millenia old.
In the Arabic speaking world, Filastini has long been used to identify people from Palestine.  Filastini is a "nisbah", a peculiar Arab/Muslim custom of using geographical nicknames to identify a persons origin.  Thus amongst Muslims who will see the use of surnames such as "Baghdadi", "Andalusi", "Rumi", "Jawi".  The famous mystic Rumi is known as such because he was born in Turkey (the old Arab word being "Rum").
Evidence for the use of filastini can be seen in the following article excerpt:
"The ascetic `Abdallah b. Muhayriz al-Jumahi al-Filastini who lived in Jerusalem (and probably died between 88-99/706/17) became seriously ill during the Byzantine summer expedition."
http://www.l.u-tokyo.ac.jp/IAS/HP-e2/eventreports/Lecker.html
11.49, Monday November 3, 2003 (GMT+8)
Not sure why this passage was deleted:
:Before that date the state of Jordan acted as this legitimate representation. There are also Arabs in Jordan who still have not acquired Jordanian citizenship. Those Palestinians themselves don't consider Jordan a Palestinian state.
Which of the three points expressed here is disputed? --Uncle Ed 18:22, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text:  The first sentence is meaningless because legitimate representation is not a defined concept.  (Which competent body granted this legitimacy?  Answer: none.)  The second sentence is true but isn't connected to the first and the word "also" has no referrant.  The third sentence is irrelevant to the article.  Actually the Jordan=Palestine crap ought to be excised from this article in totality and I am sharpening my knife.  --Zero 22:22, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: This was the intro paragraph:
:A Palestinian is a native of Palestine.
Does this mean that there are Jewish "Palestinians"? How far back in history do you have to go to be an "indigenous people" as the link above says? 
I don't think "indigenous people" or "native" is going to satisfy everyone. That's why I created an entirely separate article that deals with the 3 major ways the term "Palestinian" is used. --Uncle Ed 20:40, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are Jewish Palestinians - so the PLO calls them, anyway!  I don't know if they accept that identity, but it is certainly used to describe Jews who immigrated to Palestine in pre-Zionist times. - Mustafaa 17:37, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of "Palestinian"

message: Is this article's neutrality still under dispute? - Mustafaa 23:59, 22 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:The Adventures of Bayou Billy

message: Mad City redirects to this article but it is also the title of a movie: IMDb. -- Darklock 01:26, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Mad City redirects here. What about that 1997 film, starring John Travolta? Why hasn't that article been created? 63.231.51.55 00:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mad City 

message: Perhaps a section should be added detailing the differences between the US and Japanese verison?
Hitmaker 18:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Localization

message: There was a copy of the game and it was called the Adventures of Forest Steam.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:900:8201:51DC:2CF1:2567:F59E:9908 (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Fort Clatsop

message: The new color picture I've added of the fort is posted in a fairly new process called Anachrome 3D. This is a dual use image,
meaning that it can be seen in the thumbnail as a "normal" color image. When you open the picture it still looks fairly 
good, even through there is a small amount of "doubling" in backgrounds. With paper or plastic Red-Cyan glasses it looks
extremely real. This techique is popular with school kids. There are at least one hundred 3D images posted on Wikipedia.
Give the technique a chance, please for at least a while.3dnatureguy 01:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment

message: So the original took less than a month to build and the 2006 replica took over a year? That seems odd 67.171.221.28 (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Build time

message: I assume this is vandalism.Relgif (talk) 21:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Na cheese tional Park Service"

message: In the earlier section, it states that the expedition departed Fort Clatsop on March 23, 1806, but in the "Departure" section it says March 22, 1806. Which is it? 66.91.36.8 (talk) 11:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departure Date
Talk:Hamilton's equations

message: There is also Hamilton's Equations Matt 01:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The following sentence fragment under "More precisely" isn't even grammatically correct.  However, I don't know what it was trying to say, so I can't fix it.
"and precise the domain of values the parameter t (the "time") varies in."
hkyriazi 21:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: As already suggested here by andrej.westermann
See discussion at :Talk:Hamiltonian mechanics#Proposed_mergefrom_Hamilton.27s_equations  
-- Jheald 14:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed mergeto Hamiltonian mechanics 

message: Under the section titled "basic physical interpretation" the following statement is made...
"The most simple interpretation of the equations is as follows: The Hamiltonian H represents the energy of the physical system, which is the sum of kinetic and potential energy, traditionally denoted T resp. V:"
This is not entirely correct.  The Hamiltonian only represents the total energy of the system under very specific conditions, mainly...
1) The kinetic energy is a homogeneous quadratic function of the generalized velocities used to describe the system.
2) The potential energy does not depend on the generalized velocities. 
I understand that the author is giving a simple interpretation, but the unwary reader might take this as being true always.  I  reccomend the following revision...
"Under the proper conditions (usualy characterized by a simple system) these equations can be interpreted as follows: The Hamiltonian H represents the energy of the physical system, which is the sum of kinetic and potential energy, traditionally denoted T resp. V:"
(Tsadkiel 17:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  interpretive error
Talk:Platinum Grit

message: Isn't Trudy Cooper also the author of the Oglaf comic? 93.172.47.112 (talk) 16:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard so too. The artwork is similar. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 10:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Doug Bayne also contributed to both works.  (Source) 138.16.18.24 (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

text: If the author is Trudy Cooper, it should be mentioned somewhere, instead of just redirecting the search "Oglaf" to a mildly unrelated article (this one)87.223.86.250 (talk) 02:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oglaf 

message: I'm removing the following statement from the introduction: "The artwork has been compared to the early work of Phil Foglio, Jamie Hewlett's Tank Girl, and Elfquest by Wendy Pini."  Not only is it unsourced, but it's an unsourced claim about a statement by a living person.  Also, the citation needed tag is marked 2007 -- it's been 4 years and still no source. nhinchey (talk) 04:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing unsourced material 

message: The website for this comic appears to have lapsed; it has been replaced by one of those annoying squatter websites that direct you through a variety of ads. Someone with information should fix this. Safuman (talk) 04:19, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website?
Talk:Petunia

message: * this article seems a bit thin on information. e.g.: what about petunias being perennial? different varieties? origin? perhaps this article should be labelled a stub? --Stewartjohnson 01:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The entire bottom half of the article as currently written seems off. The-bus 14:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual reference 

message: I am going to be adding a new section for catagories - namely I will add listings for the main four types of petunias - Grandiflora, Multiflora, Milliflora, and groundcover. Let me know if anyone has an issue on this. I will also be adding some of the missing citations and maybe some better images. Bobinmpls (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catagories 

message: I was reading some other flower entries that had information about the flowers' preferred conditions (sunny/shady, lots of water, drier, etc.). It seems this information is missing for petunias and would be helpful. - cm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.40.255.135 (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preferred conditions? 

message: Pakistani editor Aftabbanoori added to the gallery several similar images labelled 'Petunia in Pakistan'. I removed the whole gallery because it doesn't comply with recommendations in WP:Galleries and WP:NOTREPOSITORY. A user based in Pakistan then reverted me. While a couple of the gallery images could be moved into the article text, there is no justification under Wikipedia's guidelines to have so many similar images depicting nothing in particular other than various unidentified petunias. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 19:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: Hi, if its OK with you I'd like to start editing the article and thought about starting with the sub-types of petunias, perhaps describing what the differences are between them.  I will strive for WP:RS and the other rules. (I'm not yet two months old so I would appreciate your feedback).  I don't mind if you just revert the edit with a small note as the reason.
--Cityside (let's talk! - contribs) 18:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding specification 

message: Find me please for my English 95.214.211.171 (talk) 06:57, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presentation about petunia
Talk:EMD GP7

message: What is the true count of GP7 production. I have added the verified original owners list several times and get the figure 2729 GP7s plus 5 GP7Bs = 2734. There is also the mention of two export GP7s on Larry Russell's GM Export page. I am trying to find out if these were new or used units. --SSW9389 (talk) 16:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

message: has C&NWRy drawings and spec sheets for #1557, that’s where added and changed info comes from. Original length, weight, and T.E. replaced so that all specs come from same loco. Neither ref try is quite right, maybe someone else can do better. Sammy D III (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody reads these. Sammy D III (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox, ref 

message: Six EMD F3s were exported to Canada in May 1948. These were the two ABA sets of order E958 shipped on May 28, 1948 numbered 9000-9005. The booster units were the 9001 and 9004. CN F3A 9005 was wrecked at South Junction, Ontario on May 17, 1958 and was sent to the GMD plant at London, Ontario. GMD built a general purpose unit for CN on order #A-1714 that used parts of the wrecked F3A. The unit resembled a phase 3 GP9 like all the other GP9s built at that time. The unit was shipped in October 1958. The unit was numbered 4824 to take the roster slot just after the CN's 24 GP7s 4800-4823. The strange part of this case is how this unit is classified by diesel historians. You can find it listed as a GP7, GP7M, and GP7R. The GMD production records show it as a GP9. At this point CN 4824 is listed on the GP7 page. The Diesel Spotter's Guide includes CN 4824 as a GP 7. It is the 112th GMD GP7, built in October 1958. --SSW9389 (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The strange case of CN 4824
Talk:ABA League

message: There is also a league for women. Setenzatsu (talk) 12:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women
Template talk:User WikiProject NFL

message: It might be a browser-specific thing, but the blue background looks pretty strange to me, creating a blue a boarder around the image that's a different width on each side.  I recommend either switching to an image with a transparent background (easier said than done), or using a white background.  Here's my stab at the latter
	This user is a member of WikiProject National Football League
<BR CLEAR=ALL>
×Meegs 02:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  blue border effect
Talk:Mark V. Shaney

message: I don't have anything to contribute, but I would like to note that this article is just plain cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.189.89.95 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 15 January 2006
:I can't help but agree. However, the second link - to Mark's Weblog - seems to be broken. Attention please! I'll remove it if it's still dead in a few days. Jobjörn 01:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't be surprised if spammers have adopted mark v shaney? Mathmo Talk 23:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Web spammers have adopted markov chains. Family Guy Guy 21:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thoughts

message: I didn't get a chance to change my vote on the AfD discussion before it was closed, but I just wanted to say for the record that I think we should KEEP this article, as some editors have done fine work to cite sources that weren't there when I originally voted.  I'm so glad that y'all did this work, because I personally think the topic is very interesting and I liked reading about it.OfficeGirl 19:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could do with a littlebit more discussion, like a "Reception" subsection, how people reacted to it, etc (I'm assuming they did, since these were the old naive days of the interwebs) 94.212.39.49 (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  some time ago. --Lexein (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed AfD Discussion 
Talk:EMD GP15

message: The dimensions in the lead paragraph and in the infobox disagree.  I'll see what I can do about verifying these, but something's off there. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 16:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions 

message: I am proposing that both EMD GP15T and EMD GP15AC be merged into this article. Both are stubs with very limited sources, and as this page states, "EMD GP15AC and EMD GP15T (are) extremely similar locomotives of the same class from the same time period." It would make more sense to merge them to this article, as they are simply very similar variants. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree as so few of each sub-type were produced. With the GP15T/GP15AC sharing a lot of commonality with the GP15-1 those articles being a part of it will improve the GP15-1 article as well. FullScale4Me (talk) 03:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed mergers 

message: I removed the "See also" section. It linked only to the EMD G16 (aka Victorian Railways X class (diesel)) but I can see no connection between these two locomotive types, other than that they were built by EMD.
The GP15-1 is a four-axle locomotive on a ~54ft frame, built in the USA in 1976-1983, with a 1500hp 8- or 12-cylinder 645-series engine. The G16/X class is a six axle locomotive on a ~60ft frame, many built under license outside the US, between 1958 and 1976, with a 1800hp 16-cylinder 567-series engine (except the last of the X-class had 16-cylinder 645-series engines). Completely different locomotive.
Dricherby (talk) 11:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "See also"
Talk:EMD GP18

message: This particular Geep has two serial numbers as it was wrecked and rebuilt early in its time on the Rock Island. The first 1329 was a GP9 built by EMD as serial #25219 on order 5599 in April 1959. That unit is documented on the GP9 page. The second 1329  was a Geep? rebuilt by EMD as serial #26348 on repair order 8069 in November 1960. The second 1329 is described as having 1750 horsepower, some sites carry it as a GP9 and some as a GP18. The Extra 2200 South roster in the shows 1329 2nd as a GP9 built in November 1960 which is a year past what is considered the end of EMD GP9 production. --SSW9389 (talk) 12:28, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock Island 1329 2nd
Talk:EMD GP20D

message: My understanding is that the D in GP20-D indicates dynamic brakes. Sans DB it would be called GP20, and be quite confusing, but correct. The little brother version, GP15, was never built (to my knowledge) with DB, so it was left as GP15. Clarification and correction is sought and appreciated. Ken (talk) 19:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the GP15T variant was built with and without dynamic brakes. The GP15 series is much older than the (new) GP20D series, with the last GP15 having been built in 1983, and the GP20Ds being from the late 1990s or later. The two models are NOT part of the same "family", other than both being sold by EMD. The GP20D was actually built and designed by Motive Power Industries, and was first sold by them as the MP2000D. In addition, the GP20D does not have an EMD engine, using a GM 16V170B20-T2 four stroke engine. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not THAT GP15. The GP15 I refer to is darn near identical to the MP GP20D of this article. Like the MP GP20, it MAY also have been sold as MP1500. CEFX had a few under lease to UP in Houston, #15xx -vs- the GP20D in the #20xx range.  Ken (talk) 20:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After a bit of research, it would appear that the "D" stands for Diesel, as a continuation of the MK/MPI/Wabtec history of designating the type of fuel used by each locomotive model. This started with the MK1200G Liquid Natural Gas fueled switcher. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: thanx, I knew someone would come thruKen (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "D" designation 
Talk:War of the Breton Succession

message: The source I've been using doesn't seem to entirly agree with what has previously been written here.  It puts the number of civilian causalties at Quimper at 1400, That is not really a problem since such numbers are just estimates anyway, put it also portrays that affair as Charles of Blois' own initiative with his own men and with Philip VI anxious to not provocate the English because of the ongoing peace conference. I'm not sure how to reconcile the two accounts, so at the moment, the two sections disagree with each other. Fornadan (t) 02:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The article says "It now fell upon... Joanna of Flanders to lead the Montfortist cause. ...she set up headquarters at Hennebont... but was driven into Brest and besieged, the siege being broken by the arrival of an English army... at the naval battle of Brest. In Paris it was feared that Edward III would land at Calais once the truce ran out."
The last sentence suggests the naval battle occurred before the truce ended. How is it possible? Top.Squark (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first truce 

message: I don't understand the sentence "Although Montfort was ultimately successful following the Battle of Auray in 1364, it was the French who gained the most from his victory."
After this war, the dukes of Brittany (of the Montfort line) considered themselves almost independant for more than a century; it would not have been the case if Charles de Blois had won this war. Pat22 (talk) 18:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It was the French who gained the most"? 

message: :
How can a fief be Sovereign? —Tamfang (talk) 00:59, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible that the term should be "vassal" rather than "fief"? It was possible during this time period for a sovereign to be a vassal to another sovereign. 143.44.65.164 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sovereignty
Talk:Robert Trimbole

message: Someone made a stubby The Texan Tavern article a few months ago.  Can someone who knows the subject better decide what's best to do with that article - merge, expand, or delete? -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 02:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the restaurant is still operating, or is otherwise notable and well known in the Griffith area, the stub article is ok I guess. If not, then a merge into this article would be more suitable. -- Longhair 03:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Texan Tavern

message: We need another source for the death dates, or an archive, if one exists (and it would appear that Ann Marie Presland is in fact still alive.) One assumes that the date of her death was an error duplicating Joan Quested's.120.147.42.76 (talk) 09:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference 3 is unavailable