lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 27, 2007

message: Please point the "more..." link to Pilot (Smallville). Thanks! Korg (talk) 11:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done by Raul654. mattbr 13:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should "pilot episode of the television series Smallville" all link to the pilot page, because Smallville used to link directly to the main article for the series. If not, that's ok, but I think "Smallville" might need to be italicized in the link because it is a title.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 19:04, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why isn't the free image being used?  –thedemonhog talk • edits • box 22:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This picture of Michael Rosenbaum, who plays Lex Luthor might also work.  –thedemonhog talk • edits • box 22:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Michael Rosenbaum picture would be fine, seeing as he's one of the three primary characters.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 20:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both done. I used the castle image b/c I think it looks better, but a crop of the Rosenbaum image would also do.--Chaser - T 00:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

message: 
Please replace image with "Michael Rosenbaum at the BE Blow Out cropped.jpg". Thanks. Siebrand (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Y Done –  20:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Rosenbaum at the BE Blow Out cropped.jpg
Talk:Roman Syria

message: I have added the "former country" template to describe the Roman province of Syria, which actually existed in its first form in 64-135 CE, until it became Syria Palaestina. Not much changed in geographical terms in 135 CE, but still it is not correct to describe the Syrian province as if it continuosly existed until 638 CE (Muslim conquest). Syria Palaestina has become part of the splinter Palmyrene Empire in 260-272, but was restored by Aurelius. In the 4th century it turned part of the Byzantine Empire (Diocese of the Orient) as Syria, Syria II, Palaestina Prima and Palaestina Secunda - thus, the material on Byzantine localities should be split into separate articles accordingly (i invite other editors to help me).Greyshark09 (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is properly Roman Syria; it has been wiki-named in order to make a complete "collection" of Roman provinces, not to serve the Wikipedia reader. BTW, the article gives the date 637, but the article Heraclius gives 634.  Can the actual date be ascertained?  --Wetman (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting the article

message: The date captioned on the map image seems wrong. It says it's from 64 BC, whereas there are many other provinces (notably Britain and Egypt, but also others) on that map which were certainly not conquered at that time. I'd guess the map is from 60AD or later.
Does anyone have another map which could be used, or shall I just change the caption? - OneCatch (talk) 10:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Change made according to date (116) on image file.OneCatch (talk) 11:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Image date 

message: Arminden (talk) 08:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No map of the province itself!
Category talk:Local council camps of the Boy Scouts of America

message: *:Category:Local council camps (Boy Scouts of America) should become :Category:Boy Scouts of America reservations. --evrik 13:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That could get confused with national level ones, like Philmont and Florida Sea Base.Rlevse 14:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change?

message: More information on all Scout camps in the U.S. is available in the . Chris 00:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More information

message: What is the difference between a notable and a non-notable local council camp? What makes a camp notable?
I have attempted to create a well-sourced article on a local council camp, but it has been deleted as being a "non-notable" subject. I provided many sources asserting notability - however these have been overlooked and the article deleted based on being assumed to be a recreation of a previously deleted (and unsourced) article on the topic. The camp is just as notable as many of the other camps included in this category (I know because I have been to many of the camps here). Furthermore, the article was well-sourced to show notability (citing more outside sources than most of the articles in here).
I don't want to be the "if you delete one you have to delete everything" guy -- but if some of these camps have articles, why is a camp that is just as notable (if not more so) and the article is well-written, researched and sourced not permitted as well. I have been unable to engage of the objectors in actual discussion on the subject an I feel like no one is listening to me. - Minsi (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I too would like to know. I tagged many of these articles for their lack of asserting notability and/or for lack of citing any sources. I'm not saying these camps are not a notable subjects, but many of these articles (as they are written now) don't show or explain what the notability is. Is there a standard, guideline or policy for gauging the notability of a local council camp? What is the minimal standard needed for a local council camp to be considered notable? Or are all local council camps just inherently notable? ScoutCruft (talk) 02:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Talk:Rampurhat II

message: Not clear from the article, though category for cities and towns is used. Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has since been moved. - Chandan Guha (talk) 01:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it a town?
Talk:List of Bible translators

message: As per the discussion at Talk:Bible translations by language#Suggested Merge, this list should be made into a sortable table. After that is done, depending on the consensus of editors, it can either remain under its current title here (List of Bible translators) or added to the end of Bible translations by language (the merge option).
I personally have no preference whether or not to merge, but I do think the sortable table would be far more useful than the present format of the list. Dovi 07:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Over at Talk:Bible translations by language, we have just started discussing splitting that huge article into a set of articles "Bible translations (language)". So the proposed merger into it of this "List of Bible translators" would become a set of mergers, one per language. And each "Bible translations (language)" article could contain a standardised section "List of translators" within it. Feel free to discuss this at that talk page. Feline Hymnic (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sortable table

message: * The Hardest Place by Helen Miller, .DFH (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somali Bible translators - Warren & Dorothy Modricker - biography details 

message: Finding a citable reference on the world wide web for this translation may be a challenge. The evidence for inserting this section is that I myself possess a signed copy, kindly given to me by the translator in 2000. DFH (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bisaya-Inunhan NT (Ang Mayad nga Balita it Bag-o nga Kasugtanan)
Talk:Loftus Hall

message: IN THE 1950'S JAMES KELLY OF FOULKSMILLS CO WEXFORD PAINSTAKINGLY REMOVED THE AGE-RELATED DEBRIS THAT HAD ACCUMULATED ON FR BROADERS HEADSTONE. IT SIMPLY GAVE HIS NAME AND DATES OF BIRTH AND DEATH. THERE WAS NO REFERENCE WHATSOEVER TO LOFTUS HALL LET ALONE AN EXORCISM.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.127.126.110 (talk) 02:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is my family , I have the family tree if anyone would like to see it . 146.90.11.37 (talk) 23:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I’m a decent to loftus hall I have my complete family tree that ties me as a family member
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles/Workshop

message: Would be in order for us to require all the warring editors to appear on The Jeremy Kyle Show to sort out their differences? ;) -BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be fair, the "Irish" editors have stayed within the realm of reality. They found evidence, posted it, and made generally appropriate recommendations based on that. The "British" editors don't bother with evidence, point fingers and arm wave, make far-fetched proposals (like Giano being banned to name but one) and tend to oppose any findings of fact or remedies against "their" side. A rather large cluestick does seem to be needed right now. One Night In Hackney303 17:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Jeremy Kyle Show
Talk:Canlaon

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There's a confusion in the article and I want to clarify that — there are de facto 12 barangays in the city. "Biak-na-Bato" is not a barangay of Canlaon but of neighboring La Castellana. 
As of today, there is no updated map and the current map is not accurate. Mercame (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of barangays
Talk:Tanjay

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tagbilaran City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 07:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: How is the name of the city pronounced locally? [tanhaj], [tandʒaj], or something else? --Kikos (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name pronounce
Talk:Bayawan

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>


message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tacloban City which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 07:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:String Quartet No. 3 (Mendelssohn)

message: The external link to "Performance of String Quartet No. 3 by the Belsea Quartet from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in MP3 format" is, though lovely, incorrect. This MP3 is a performance of Op. 44 No. 2. {Chickpeana (talk) 22:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Imidazolidine

message: If possible, it'd be nice to include a link to Aminal, an article about the general class of molecules to which imidazolidine belongs. I don't want to interfere while the narrative of the article is still evolving, though, hence commenting here instead of editing directly. --Ben (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed, I'll do that.  Trying to get a general ref to aminals.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imidazolidine is an aminal
Template talk:Markets in London

message: I added the market to the modern wholesale section, without noting it was already in the 'historic' section. This is one market where the modern wholesale market remains in the refurbished historic buildings. At the moment, the City have plans for one end of the site (the old cold stores), this will probably result in a need for a distinction between the 'historic' theme park and the modern wholesale. Pls revert that one if you prefer to keep it in the historic section. Kbthompson (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smithfield Market 

message: There's also a weekday market in Whitecross Street - although it's not a patch on wot it used to be! Kbthompson (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitecross St
Talk:Kim Weaver

message: why is this page being deleted? Agent204.15 12:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please see WP:BIO. Please also provide sources to establish the subject's notability. Of course, the need for sources goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be verifiable, and facts included must be attributed to a reliable source. Thanks. --Evb-wiki 12:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Schools and colleges in Croydon

message: As Dahliarose has said at Template talk:Schools in Greenwich, "This template needs a lot of work. Primary schools are not normally considered notable enough to have articles. Only primary schools with blue links should be included in such templates. The red linked secondary schools would also be best removed and only added once appropriate articles have been created." I agree with that. Redlinks in navigation templates seem to serve no useful purpose and also create problems, as they sometimes encourage the creation of articles for schools which aren't notable. I suggest that it would be better to include the blue links only and add new articles for notable schools as they are created, which is the norm in almost all such templates. Does anyone object to that approach? Xn4 03:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tuaminoheptane

message: Organic Chemist chiming in here- might it be more appropriate to call this 2-aminoheptane? I recognize that the name is very similar, but 2-aminoheptane follows IUPAC designation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.137.171.95 (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Two-aminoheptane... --FK1954 (talk) 19:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Section
Category talk:Death

message: Why is Rock salmon listed under the category Death? What connection to death does it have besides being dead?
It should be deleted from here, but I can't edit the section directly.
Thank you in advance,
ThunderBird 12:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: Why is this here? It's out of place from the rest of the articles, it refers to death in terms of computers, not living things like the rest of the articles in the category refers to. I think it should be deleted from here...T.c.w7468 (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to remove it, just to let everyone know... T.c.w7468 (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Click of death]]
Talk:Pop (NSYNC song)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 July 2023
Talk:Raymond Deane

message: Do I have enough sources for this article?Davidod87 12:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the Works doesn't violate NOTADIRECTORY, it needs a ref following each entry, not before them, as people can add to the list later and readers will not know otherwise what is included. --Epeefleche (talk) 19:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works
Talk:Brian Paddick/Archive 1

message: I have a lot of admiration for Brian Paddick, but am not comfortable with the neutrality of parts of this article.  Can I propose a bit of a rewrite?  Specifically, lines like...
:His actions had an extremely positive effect on the crime rate of the Brixton area, and relations between the community and police improved dramatically. His popularity was also boosted by his willingness to engage in debate with the local community
...really ought to be backed up with some figures, and the point of view of Paddick's opponents explored.  As the article stands, it seems to me to be open to criticism for being POV and unencyclopaedic - Ormondroyd 08:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Change it how you see fit then.  Be bold -- Francs2000 | Talk  21:22, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: Discus - OPERATION DURSLEY. Anyone able to tie Brian into Paddick era Brixton OPERATION DURSLEY when 200 kitted out riot cops supported by Special Branch descended on a local activist social centre ("The Button Factory" in Herne Hill Road) just 4 days after the Metroplitan Police Authority had sponsored a come all ye "POLICING DIVERSITY" extravaganza (27 March 2001) at Lamnbeth Town Hall? OPERATION DURSLEY was a pre -emptive police operation against political activists who police believed would be assisting in the organisation of forthcoming May Day Protests. 
TheGuntz 23:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not use Wikipedia as an attempt to contact the subject of the article in question.  And please, no fishing for conspiracies either. -- Francs2000  23:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OPERATION DURSLEY
Talk:Order of the Red Banner of Labour

message: Please do not revert back to "labor"- the spelling used in the article should match those of the title. --DandanxD 13:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour/Labor 
Talk:Sri Lanka Kaffirs

message: *Destination page:Sri Lanka Kaffirs
*Source page:African Sri Lankans
*Merge rationale:Ony African people in Sri Lanka is Sri Lanka Kaffir people. There is no notable modern day African expats in Sri Lanka too. (eg. knowledge workers, labourers etc.) Information can be present in destination page without a problem.--Chanaka L (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought of merging these two articles too, but I found so information on a lost ethnic African group called Nittevo that apparently went extinct around 1750. --Blackknight12 (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read about Nittevos. There is not much about them to suggest they are related to Africa. They might related to Veddas. (Veddas said to be the one who had seen the Nittevos last). So I believe it is not a matter in here. Regards--Chanaka L (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah there isn't much information on them so maybe we should just merge these two, plus all the information on African Sri Lankans is alresy on Sri Lanka Kaffirs. Regards--Blackknight12 (talk) 06:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

text: In Sri Lanka, word Kaffir is not derogatory. Please see ref #2.--Chanaka L (talk) 05:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: This article uses the  derogatory term, which means the barbarians.  Pls remove and use a proper term such as ஆப்பிரிக்கர் or கறுப்பினத்தவர்.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.101.107 (talk) 03:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamil derogatory term காப்பிலி
Talk:St Edmund's Roman Catholic Primary School

message: I (the creator of this article) am working on this and will fix out any issues, I also have permission from the school to create this article.
TomRed 13:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be careful not to use the language from your sources and be sure to cite your sources. Also, you may want to read Wikipedia's notability guidelines and be sure to verify notability with secondary sources. Thank you. :) --Moonriddengirl 13:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The revision is good.  Thank you.  :) — madman bum and angel 04:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of why this page should not be deleted
Talk:ECW One Night Stand (2005)

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 10, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
GA review (see here for criteria)
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:C. No original research: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:B. Focused: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- LAX 00:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: How are they relevant to this article, especially the ones mentioned during the Benoit/Guerrero match that had nothing to do with the participants in the ring? Also, if it's OR to say they were about Lita, why is she linked when talking about them? It just seems to me that they are there so someone would have an excuse to write "fuck" a few times and they add nothing to the article.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 22:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They were part of the whole WWE vs. ECW angle that was a major storyline. When the audience chanted them doesn't matter. Where is Lita's name linked to in the chants other than the "Lita's got herpies" one? It wouldn't upset me to remove them (nor did I put them in the first place), but they have been in for quite some time and maybe should be discussed first. TJ Spyke 22:13, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowd Chants 

message: I'm pretty sure Maven was there as a part of the crusade. I'm not sure if he was not put in the description for a reason but if you individually listed everyone else I don't see why he shouldn't be listed with the RAW guys.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.77.26 (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have proof he was part of it? TJ Spyke 21:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maven
Talk:Cheap (ward)

message: i hear this place isn't very expensive  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.236.115.169 (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Coleman Street Ward

message: In latest edit, I've distinguished between the ward and the street, which are not identical, in order to prevent confusion of the twain...
Also found some fascinating info to the effect that the street name devives from Kohl Mund, or cabbage patch. Which aforesaid cabbage patch was apparantly a gift from Saxon King Egbert to Bishop Alban. But as this sounds like complete bollocks I have not included it in the article. Colin4C (talk) 11:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it better to move it. Leutha (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ward and Street 
Talk:Asian swamp eel

message: There's a tag on one section of this article, but with no explanation here on the talk page. I found the edit comment that went with the tag: too much and too prescriptive emphasis on supposed "invasiveness") Zyxwv99 (talk) 20:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifying tag 