lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phloeodes diabolicus

message: Diabolical ironclad beetle redirects here. Should this common/popular name not be mentioned in the article?--Nø (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: 2606:A000:1126:28D:6D82:1150:3AC7:E5B0 (talk) 07:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diabolical ironclad beetle 

message: ...The one in the article looks like one that didn't survive being run over by a car.  There are plenty of photos on the net -- surely there is one that is royalty-free. 2606:A000:1126:28D:6D82:1150:3AC7:E5B0 (talk) 06:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo, please 

message: This article is well written for what it includes but seems to be missing a few relevant sections.
The lead section concisely summarizes the information in the article and introduces the topic, including links to other relevant articles. The tone is neutral and neither too concise nor too detailed. However, the lead section includes dietary and habitat information not found in the article that should be expanded upon in its own section. The content is relevant and up to date but overrepresents the bioengineering perspective on this beetle as it has no other sections than the shell structure and proceeding commentary on the strength this provides. The shell structure section does not mention that the structure found was used to engineer highly strong and ductile metal alloys with a similar micro-structure to their shells, which could either be the last paragraph of that section or be used to start a new section about the use of this insect in material science. There are underutilized sources that do describe the lifecycle, range, and reclassification of this beetle from Nosoderma diabolicum to Phloeodes diabolicus. Thus portions of the content and sources are underdeveloped. The organization and writing quality are clear. The article includes helpful supporting images of the insect but could be improved with a diagram of the insect's shell structure in that section. One of the images is missing a source and the other is uncaptioned, so that aspect of the article could be improved. The article is rated as start-class and has little in the talk page, while it overall feels incomplete due to the lack of sections for historical taxonomy, uses in material science, and lifecycle information. CrimsonJF (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was asked to evaluate this article and may be editing it to address my concerns listed below. 

message: — Assignment last updated by CrimsonJF (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors Topics Bio Sci

message: I edited the article to include sections with all the information in the lead and more information on life history of this beetle. I also added a section focusing on the taxonomic history of this beetle to clarify it's synonymous names and which years it used which names or was considered a member of which genus or family so that further research would be easier. CrimsonJF (talk) 21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I edited the article to include sections on ecological role and taxonomic history
Talk:Sago worm

message: I removed the Ecuador reference. The reference only mentions palm weevils, not Sago palm weevils, and the Sago palm does not seem to be native or cultivated in South America. Matthias5 (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sago Palm weevil in Ecuador

message: Perhaps they don;t call it Sago Palm (Locally called Possée or something like that) but in the DRCongo they eat this too  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.208.130 (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other places 

message: I suggest that this article be merged with the Rhynchophorus ferrugineus article.Aderksen (talk) 04:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Italian governorate of Montenegro

message: There are many uncited claims in this article that is almost entirely unsourced.
*1) It claims that the territory was to be completely Italianized, that is a major claim and it needs a reliable source as a reference.
*2) Claims of numbers of people killed need to be attributed to a reliable source.
There are many more claims that need sources, but these are what I'm starting with.--74.12.195.248 (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, it is almost entirely unsourced, that's why it has the captag. I'm not an expert on Montenegro, but I've never read the Italianised bit either. I actually think the really outrageous stuff should just be trimmed and will do that now. Peacemaker67  (send... over) 09:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems of uncited claims 

message: What's with the name change? The proclamation of 12 Jul 1941 by the Црногорски cабор (Crnogorski sabor) meeting in Cetinje states: "Проглашава се суверена и независна Држава Црна Гора у облику Уставне Монархије -Proglašava se suverena i nezavisna Država Crna Gora u obliku Ustavne Monarhije" ("There is proclaimed the sovereign and independent State of Montenegro in the form of Constitutional Monarchy"); later in the text of the proclamation, the style Краљевина Црна Гора (Kraljevna Crna Gora) is used. 
JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 00:57, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The 12 July proclamation was shelved (due to the uprising), the high commissioner was recalled, and Montenegro became officially known as Governatorato del Montenegro, with Biroli as military governor. It's well documented in the text of the article, and supported by Rodogno, Tomasevich, Pavlowitch and Lemkin. Regards, Peacemaker67  (send... over) 01:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change??
Talk:Wegmans LPGA

message: The Wegmans LPGA is not the LPGA Championship. These are two separate tournaments.  The Wegmans LPGA is defunct as of 2010 and I have edited this article to reflect that. The LPGA Championship has changed venues and sponsors from Bulle Rock to Rochester and from McDonalds to Wegmans. --Crunch (talk) 19:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The tournament is hardly defunct.  At most, it's a one-year hiatus; there's no reason to think there won't be a tournament in 2011.  As such, I've largely reverted your changes.  Powers T 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wegmans LPGA is not the LPGA Championship
Talk:The good life

message: 1. Who tagged this?
2. what is this article supposed to really be about?
3. Why is the author assuming that the "good life" is Christianity? Dirtbike spaceman (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly.-WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: wha?

message: It takes a phrase that has myriad interpretations through history and assumes it to be a synonym for lives of voluntary simplicity and then provides some meagre references to a few such "simple life" ideas.
If the article is not to be deleted, it needs to be expanded dramatically to include other notions of the good life and full historical surveys of both the philosophical notion and the usage of the term.  Failing that, it seems to me it would be better to remove both the sub heads and just leave it a brief stubTheCormac (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon reflection and after viewing the Wiki guidelines on deletion of articles (here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion), I followed the advice of those guidelines and rather than nominate the article for deletion I acted "boldly" to fix it be deleting the two sections of tangental materially (neither of which contained a single footnote, or sourcing reference.)  As I explained above, I believe this article is stronger and more neutral as the much shorter stub it is now rendered. TheCormac (talk) 00:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps this entry should be deleted
Talk:John Surratt

message: This article gives conflicting dates for his trial 
and acquittal: 
:On September 15, 1865, Surratt fled to England and later to Rome. He joined the Papal Zouaves. When his whereabouts was discovered he went to Alexandria, Egypt. There he was arrested on November 27, 1866. Surratt was brought back to the United States and went on trial for murder on June 10, 1867. The jury heard 80 witnesses for the government and 90 witnesses for the defense. The trial ended August 10 with the jury deadlocked (4 votes = guilty; 8 votes = not guilty). Eventually, Surratt was freed in the summer of 1868. He had benefited from the fact that he had been tried by a civil court. To read an excellent account of the trial, please see the article entitled The Case of John Harrison Surratt, Jr. by John F. Doyle in the March, 2000, edition of the Surratt Courier.
Which account is correct? Drutt 08:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: I just finished reading John H. Surratt's diary, and noticed in it, it seems to conflict with this Wikipedia page. This page says that Surratt was introduced to John Wilkes Booth in 1864 by Dr. Mudd, shortly before the kidnapping plot, but his diary implies that he knew Booth at least around  February 20th, 1861, as evidenced on this page. The Booth referred to could potentially be a different one, but it is implied to be John Wilkes Booth, due to his acquaintance with a mysterious woman that continues after it was confirmed to be John Wilkes Booth in the diary. I'm not sure where the information gotten on this article was acquired because it doesn't seem to be cited, and I've never done an edit like this so I don't want to change it incorrectly, but I think this is worth looking into as a possible error in the wiki page.
RoundSquare (talk) 01:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question Involving When John Surratt met Booth
Talk:Bryan Cantrill

message: There have been a number of accusations. See https://blog.valerieaurora.org/2016/10/22/why-i-wont-be-attending-systems-we-love/ / https://blog.valerieaurora.org/2018/07/01/bryan-cantrill-has-been-accused-of-verbal-abuse-by-at-least-seven-people/ https://twitter.com/izs/status/790061421149106177 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15268398  etc. I think that there should be at least some mention of these in the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  abuse accusations
Talk:Illinois v. Wardlow

message: People are trying to edit this post in an attempt to make this case solely about race. This is absolutely ridiculous and disgusting. This case had nothing to do with race or the idiotic "running while black" comparison. Police did their job effectively, it was held up by the highest law of the land, and a criminal was taken off of the street for attempting to sell drugs while carrying an illegal weapon. But we won't see this in your article.    Onursides (talk) 14:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll assume good faith and recommend you read our policy of WP:NOTFORUM. Best regards, Isabelle 🔔 14:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: comment 25 july 2021
Talk:Filter (software)

message: "Filter program" is a Unix-specific concept with a technical definition; 
perhaps the page should be renamed "Filter (Unix)".  
Pherhaps there should be a separate page, e.g. "Filter (software)" for non-Unix filters such as mail filter, printer filter, spam filter, etc. however only the first of these exists at present... Jorge Stolfi 00:51, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Untitled) 

message: It would be much appreciated if the contributors to this article coul fix disambiguation page links contained herein. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig links

message: filter is also an important High-order function in functional prograsmming, somehow similar to guards in "list comprehensions".
It looks like filter(some array or tuple or set, boolean function f wrt array element) and returns subarray of given arrays where f was true.
For example, in pseudo-language, filter ( [1,2,-3,5,0,-4,2,-1], >0 ) would yield as its result the array [1,2,5,2] filtering out all numbers <=0
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.176.32.19 (talk) 
: I have started a page filter (higher-order function). — Tobias Bergemann 13:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Higher-order function 

message: Wouldn't it be more useful if there were simper examples that showed what you can do with a pipeline, and not require knowledge of perl to understand?  e.g. "cat /etc/passwd | cut -d : -f 1 | grep foo" or something like that?  The perl examples don't even have the pipe symbol, so while I can see they are filtering, they don't use standard input like it says they do. 84.209.77.218 (talk) 23:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaningless examples

message: Pretty much the same topic. The Unix article should be merged in here. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:33, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not merge the articles Filter (software) and Filter (Unix). The former can be considered as the general concept, the latter considered the Unix implementation of the former. Compare to Pipeline (software) and Pipeline (Unix), which are distinctive articles. --Abdull (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Little v. Barreme

message: Getting ahead of a potential edit war here. On  I edited the page to show the Little v. Barreme ruling's impact on the superior orders legal defense as regards the US Armed Forces. On , this was removed, on the argument that the citation did not support the assertion: "if anything, it supports the opposite; United States v. Jones (1813) stated the modern version, which is different from what Little v. Barreme states".
This is simply a false statement. Neither the assertion nor the citation stated nor were intended to argue that Little presented the modern version of the principle. I stated only that they were an early version that was then expanded and codified in Jones et al. -- StarSword (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance to the "superior orders" defense
Talk:Akashi, Hyōgo

message: I think that Nishi-Akashi is actually part of Akashi City, but I'm not 100% sure. Also, does anyone have any information about the possible site of a castle in Nishi Akashi?. There seems to be a site with no standing remains a short walk generally north from JR Nishi-Akashi station. 163.134.3.3 09:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that castle is "Shikitsu-jo", but I can't find any info in English on it. Whogue 23:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nishi Akashi

message: I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 14:25, January 3, 2011 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements.
In July 21, 2001, during local firework event in Okura beach, and local audience was stop for watching this event in footbridge, following to panic and stampede near by Asagiri Station.
This disaster was the lack of security measures, and former depty chief of Akashi Police Department, Kazumitsu Sakaki is enforced to prosecutors indicted the board, after no bill for three times from local procecution board in January 27, 2010. According to Hyogo Prefecture official confirmed report, 11 people death with 247 are injured . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.23.5.48 (talk) 14:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About 2001 Asagiri footbridge stampede disaster 
Talk:Köhler illumination

message: I created this article...I plan to add more referances and elaborate on the technique...if anybody has input I would love to hear it & I hope people add their own edits Coolbrdr 09:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: Thanks.  A diagram would be great to explain/show. Rod57 15:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions

message: I have seen some suggestions that microscope objectives and condensers are generally telecentric. Can anyone here confirm or deny that? Please update that talk page or article. Thanks. --195.137.93.171 (talk) 07:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telecentric ? 

message: I'm doing a project on this in class now, a diagram would be great for future students if anyone has one or could make one!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeleveto (talk • contribs) 15:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuclearnova

message: 'By adjustment of the field diaphragm the amount of light entering the sample can be freely adjusted without altering the wavelengths of light present, in contrast to reducing power to the light source with critical illumination.' - These two techniques are not comparable. Reducing the field diaphragm reduces the field of illumination but does nothing to change the intensity of the illumination. In Koehler illumination the intensity of the illumination may be changed either by changing the power to the light source (thus changing the temperature of the light generated by the source) or by inserting neutral density filter into the light path, usually in the collimated beam between the collector lens and the field diaphragm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.115.129 (talk) 01:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Advantages

message: This image was removed from the article in 2017. It may not be perfect, but for the lack of a better one should it not be put back in again? Dietzel65 (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I take that back. Now there is an alternative, :File:Kohler Illumination en.svg. Dietzel65 (talk) 20:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  diagram 

message: I have a decent layperson’s understanding of optics and I find this section pretty nearly 100% opaque. (I suppose a background in optics helps one recognize opacity, but that’s a separate topic.) Part of the confusion is that this section continues the discussion of critical versus Kohler illumination from the previous section, which is confusing in itself. What’s going on in the ray-tracing diagram is not clear at all. It doesn’t help to talk about conjugate planes when the reader is unlikely to know what a conjugate plane is; the text becomes mere jargon at that point. I certainly didn’t come away from this understanding the optical principles of Kohler illumination.
Poihths (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The “Optical Principles” section needs clarification
Talk:Porgera Gold Mine

message: Porgera redirects here but it shouldn't, there needs to be an entry made on the town itself, as Porgera is also a population centre. aliasd·U·T 03:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Security can use lethal force? A new one on me. You can defend yourself in PNG, like in most countries, and the castle principle applies, provided a warning shot is fired. (Note, most western countries have long dispensed with the warning shot requirement in the CP.) The refs pointed to are not objective, and are probably self research. Some greenie is doing this to all mining operation Wiki pages. There's a constant theme occurring about mine employees sexually assaulting women, from Africa to South America. Must be a cut-and-paste job, then referencing his own blogs as proof of the assertions.  203.213.61.166 (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lethal force?
Talk:King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre

message: The title needs to be changed to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CenterAbrnkak (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they spell it Centre - the British spelling. I used to work there. 146.88.48.248 (talk) 07:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Nissan March R

message: ･Wikipedia GFDL OK ･1 and public organization contribution condition of condition. Only "Use with GFDL" is allowed. ･Thing that accompanying and I describe thing that is source origin of original clearly
･Only condition 2 and the (A) original person in question can use the original, and contribute.
･It allows it the encouragement as for the postscript and the retouch that needing becomes condition 2 and (B) correspondence matter. Or, it can be a reprint by the origin of this original person in question allowance. ･Use of condition 3 the second without permission self-regard is not permitted.
※Things linked by rule of describing clearly of exhibition origin．
Double charge club ＠ mastermind and ek-10stとやま--ek-10st Toyama 09:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[March R]] Indication rule 

message: Nissan march r.jpg ap　--202.163.175.34 07:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  jn Wikipedia March R 

message: en
1988March R and the 1990March Superturbo are completely independent car models, and the body shape is different,
too.
ja
マーチRとマーチスーパーターボは完全に独立車種であり、ボディ形状も違う。したがって記事は分別する事。--202.163.175.34 05:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  March R and March Superturbo
Talk:Angiodysplasia

message: - Prof Hodgson discusses hormone treatment. I have no access to the fulltext yet, so cannot share this conclusions with the readers. JFW | T@lk 09:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't seem to get to sci-hub right now to check either. I'm wondering if it is the source of the information about hormone therapy towards the end of this article. I'm particularly suspicious of the claim that "voice changes" are bothersome for men taking hormone therapy. Ask any trans woman and we'll tell you that estradiol does not change your voice one bit if you've already gone through male puberty. Lumberjane Lilly (talk) 18:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: PMID
Talk:Honeypot (tourism)

message: Talk:Honeypot (geography)
who agrees that a honeypot location... which is an area of land such as national parks that are attractive are like a bee hive honeypot?
i agree with that .........  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.23.247 (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: This article refers to "Young blood Honeypots" without explaining what that means. What does it mean? - I've never come across the phrase before.  PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 10:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Young blood honeypots"

message: With these edits I have removed all the examples. There are no references to why any of them is a honeypot. Without that, they are just arbitrary lists of tourist attractions. Without that, the article is essentially a stub and I've marked it as such. Even so, there are many statements without any supporting evidence so I've marked it as .
I have, however, tried to expand the scant references actually on the article. Si Trew (talk) 20:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed examples and improved refs 

message: This seems to be a UK term only. I've never heard it in the USA. Mangoe (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK only?
Talk:West Bank Story

message: *  Scottsdale 
*  Scottsdale%2c Arizona 
* "...parody of the classic musical film West Side Story,..."  & homage elsewhere, as well, to my recollection.
* The costume[s] & set[s] are dominated by excellent  sight-gag, superb  clich%c3%a9, regarding  fast-food, movies, television, et cetera.  I, vaguely, recall  puns, as well.  For persons who like this sort of  parody, it can be wondrous.
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 00:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ homage ]] 

message: I've removed references to David being related to the Kosher King people since there's no indication of him being related to anyone working there. Mcljlm (talk) 03:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  David