lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Human factors and ergonomics

message: Why is there not a more serious discussion still taking place here on merging Ergonomics, the Outline of ergonomics, and the Human factors articles, like there was on the Human factors talk page a few years ago? ||| Kyle Alan Hale | talk | 21:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! These have to be merged. The parallelity of these articles on synonymous(!) terms causes biases. Who can do this? --Karesz1h (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have begun a new debate regarding merging these articles. See Talk:Human_factors#Renewed_merge_debate. Famousdog  (c) 18:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Merged this page and Human factors to a new page Human factors and ergonomics as per this (lack of) discussion. Famousdog  (c) 09:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:The Glebe

message: In the article on The Glebe, Ottawa, Ontario, there is an editorial note stating that Ottawa may be the only city known to have a significant district named "The Glebe".  This is semi-correct.  However, there are several cities around the world with districts and neighbourhoods called "Glebe" (without the "The"). These include: Hobart, Newcastle and Sydney in Australia, Newcastle-upon-Tyne in England, Dublin in Ireland and Durban in South Africa.  There are also neighbourhoods called Glebe Manors and Glebewood Village in Arlington, Virginia and Glebe Heights in Anne Arundel, Maryland.  (Ian Kendall, Melbourne, Australia, August 2004).
----
I made a small change, adding "currently suspended" to the line describing the Renegades present status.--ScotchWhisky 22:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do we really need the list of businesses?  It doesn't really seem very encyclopedic to me.--Cjrother (talk) 03:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of businesses 

message: With two exceptions, everything in this article either cites a single article that ran in the Ottawa Journal in June 1969, or is uncited. Thus, I've tagged the article accordingly.
Surely we can find more sources for our facts about The Glebe?
--Rob Kelk 01:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source
Talk:Skill testing question

message: I'm not sure if the short description I put was really correct/accurate.
Currently the description is: 
 AltoStev Talk 16:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the old short description is more accurate, since the revised description lost the nuance that 1) skill testing question is a legal requirement and 2) unique Canadian requirement. I have reverted back to old description. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  short description
Talk:North Carolina-class battleship

message: The USS North Carolina is still in existence. The page for the ship gives it in the present tense. Thus, a ship in the class still exists, and it should be present tense. --Tickery (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's in the past tense because it's mostly a design history, and the class articles on the s and s are the same. But I'm not too worried either way. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  This isn't the first time the issue of tense has been brought up on ship pages. Perhaps the issue would be discussed at WT:SHIPS? - wolf 01:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. , I've opened a discussion at WT:SHIPS#Past vs. present tense in ship class articles with an extant member. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 16:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense
Talk:POV

message: Could there be a page 'persistence of vision' which refers to the effect used by various devices to create text from a single line light source? note - am not voluteering at this stage... 00:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Persistence of vision

message: Shouldn't the Point of View Half-Life mod be thrown in with the rest of the Point of View (disambiguation) section? It seems to fit the same category. Just thought I should double-check to see that I'm not missing something. Galatix27 (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half-Life Mod
Talk:United States Air Force Academy

message: I know I'm back after a long time, but I feel like I need to check in every now and again (and I apologize in advance if norms have changed since I last edited). I wanted to throw out some thoughts on the "Traditions" section...it feels clunky, and has the potential for getting clunkier. There are hundreds of potential USAFA traditions that could be listed, and very, very few of them are so integral to the Academy that they are relevant to the greater article.  Most are, at best, curious bits of insider-knowledge, mostly of interest to cadets, grads, and perhaps a few USAFA groupies. We used to have an Academy folklore Wiki many moons ago, where that stuff went, but that is long defunct, and there's not much of a place to put them. Still, they bog down the article here. Any thoughts on paring down that section and better incorporating the most relevant stuff into the article? Tarfu92 (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditions 

message: Buckshot06 has begun an edit war to include the following sentence in the "Board of Visitors" section:
:Despite the officially stipulated four board meetings a year, there was at least a fourteen month gap between the last BoV meeting of 2020, on November 18, 2020, and the next meeting, on April 13, 2022.
Without a source that says that this is noteworthy, this is undue weight (and original research). It is trivially true that this is a fourteen-month gap but we have no idea if this is important and worth including in the article without independent, reliable sources reporting on it and providing additional, critical context.
In any case, it's certainly not something that an editor should be edit-warring to add to the article, especially without making the barest effort to first discuss the issue here in Talk. ElKevbo (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was probably due to COVID, given the dates. I imagine they got an exemption or something. We definitely need a source that actually discusses it directly. BilCat (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like they did meet virtually at least once per USAFA Board of Visitors convenes virtually". BilCat (talk) 20:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's so grand that people have more trust in going to little used talk pages than me!! Most of the things I do the talk pages are virtually dusty lanes of tumbleweed. Thankyou BilCat for providing the vital third option to break the deadlock here. The April 2022 meeting was held virtually as well, I will note. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring about the board of visitors 

message: As of 2023, the Men’s water polo team joined the West Coast Conference after previously participating as a member of the Western Water Polo Association 2601:681:300:A320:75F5:11E4:B708:E569 (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Men’s Water Polo
Template talk:Template

message: Eequor, you're my new personal hero. I had the idea to create this page just a few moments ago, using the exact same syntax and the exact same name. Thank you! • Benc • 04:35, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: – ABCD 18:20, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Please append the following to categorize the redirect:
 Thank you, Clyde!Franklin! 12:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: as it will end up causing the upstream cascade protection to flow down, overriding the tprots. If you want something simple that isn't template-based added here (such as a category) please open another er. — xaosflux Talk 16:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 8 February 2023
Talk:Third Echelon

message: From VfD:
This looks like a paranoid rant or a cut and paste from a conspiracy theory page. Everything I have read on the NSA describes them as a bunch of non-violent electronics engineers, techs software specialists and computer science geniuses. AlainV 05:19, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the term "Splinter Cell" refer to the entire team? I could have sworn Sam Fisher was just the Splinter Cell operative. --Foot Dragoon 20:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second the above statement made. The very first game's fact "generator" even says that.  ♣ Klptyzm  Chat wit' me  §  Contributions ♣ 18:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Splinter Cell" 

message: There is no controversy as to the existence of the program. There are plenty of references at the ECHELON article itself. The BBC claims that US officials have confirmed its existence. A US Representative confirm its existence in the presence of the chairman for the house intelligence committee without question.  It's also discussed in a House Judiciary hearing, without question, during discussion on Amendment IV and it's relationship to signal intelligence.  Like the Cointelpro, and ARTICHOKE/MKULTRA, the existence was at once time only considered rumoured or conspiracy theory, but is completely confirmed as true today. Divinus 10:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you kidding? Did you spell it wrong when searching the text? It contains three! Check Page 87, paragraph 1 ; Page 199, paragraph 5 ; and Page 201, paragraph 2 . It is part of the public record that is published by the House itself. There is no dispute whatsoever, and you're just dismissing fact out of hand. How is an interview with Representatives and the House Intelligence Committee Chairman on 60 Minutes not 'up to snuff'? There is plenty of evidence of the program's existence. Do you have any citations of a government official denying the existence of the project? Divinus 23:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question of ECHELON's existence
Template talk:IMDb/Archive 2

message: For the old discussion about the development of this template, see this page
----
I've noticed, while wandering on some movie\actor articles, that the links (on the external links section) to IMDb.com vary too much.
I think that since Wikipedia should be organized and conventioned, we should set some standard to IMDb links, and since these are common, we could use a template.
That's why I made this one. Later, it was decided we should have two templates, one for people and one for titles.
Here they are, with examples on how to use and how they look like rendered.
:Template:imdb title
:
:
:Template:imdb name
:
:
For detailed instructions on how to use them, check Template talk:imdb name and Template talk:imdb title.
Any questions or doubts, go to my talk page  — Kieff | Talk 04:02, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)
I disagree because:
* It is much easy to copy and paste a url to put a link instead of using some programming language like syntax.
* We need to teach people about the existence of this template, which takes away our precious time to write articles.
* The use of bots is more common to fix the style issues.
* Parsing templates could reduce server performance.
In other words, the general consensus is not to use templates if there is no pressing need to do so.
-- Taku 23:50, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
I've created a new template for production company pages at the imdb, here's inf. about it and its usage:
:Template:imdb company
:
:Gorky Film Studios at IMDb 
Cmapm 15:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:A&P

message: * What I think should be changed: A&P & Waldbaum's have been purchased out of bankruptcy, The new ownership has revived the store how it started originally selling coffee and tea online and in supermarkets like Shoprite.
* Why it should be changed: So it's accurate information
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
https://apcoffeetea.com/
https://www.grocerydive.com/news/grocery--iconic-ap-grocery-brand-finds-a-buyer/534050/
http://waldbaums.com/
http://www.aptea.com/
https://www.americanlegacybrands.com/
https://www.amazon.com/live/video/069e7824ea1a464881a26754e0f03268?ref_=cm_sw_em_r_ib_dt_CTx87z5j2VZOq
https://www.shoprite.com/sm/pickup/rsid/3000/results?q=black%20label
Jaizer26 (talk) 21:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: An independent, reliable source specifying a connection between apcoffeetea.com and A&P would be a big help.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A&P & Waldbaum's
Talk:Merrie Spaeth

message: Original entry grabbed August 28 from Disinfopedia - a GFDL license site. Wolfman 07:54, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: why was she chosen for the role? had she had much acting experience before that? and after playing such a terrific character, why did she not have much of an acting career after that? Kingturtle 21:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The World of Henry Orient
Talk:Black Lotus

message: An article for a single card from Magic? Even if it does go for $1000 (which I doubt it does; I thought the bottom had somewhat fallen out of that market). Merge and redirect to Magic: The Gathering, before we get thousands of other pages like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by R. fiend (talk • contribs) 08:00, 29 August 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Votes for deletion

message: This is the search result for Power Nine. I would like to know where this list of cards came from in the first place. Obviously it is not universally accepted that they are the most powerful cards in magic, so the source is important. Dragonlord — Preceding undated comment added 04:03, 30 January 2005‎ (UTC)
:No, and the article doesn't (or shouldn't) claim that they're the most powerful cards, but that is their common collective name. I have 1996 InQuests that use the term, and I believe I can find a dated strategy book with Mark Justice, Gary Wise, and others using the term. I believe the term has its roots from before 1995. I'll try to track it down.
:Incidentally, I think this article should be moved to "power nine". It would not take much more to add descriptions for the other cards, and much of the article is directed toward that anyway. Cool Hand Luke 06:04, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old comments 

message: I appreciate that this was previously moved per request, and presumably appropriately.  At this point, the page is a dab at black lotus, but the only entries seem to be capitalized.  So, the proper place for the page would seem to be Black Lotus. If an actual "black lotus" existed, perhaps that fact would inform the page title choice. ENeville (talk) 01:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 

message: The original Conan stories refer to a black lotus as a poisonous plant.  I'm wondering if Ron Howard invented the mythology surrounding the flower or recycled it from somewhere else.
He recoiled, recognizing the black lotus, whose juice was death, and whose scent brought
dream-haunted slumber.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.179.27.117 (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conan
Talk:Edward II of England

message: I think we can add a source or even a sentence about Edward's possible survival after 1327 from Kathryn Warner's (herself with a Wikipedia page) books "Edward II: An Unconventional King" and "Long Live the King?" Geographynerd101 (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Source for ‘Controversies’ Section 

message: Why would an English king be referred to by the Welsh spelling, instead of the English spelling, Caernarvon? English is pronounced properly. 142.205.202.71 (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Caernarfon is the English spelling, although it's valid to point out the variant, especially if it was much more common in the past. Google ngram seems to back up both points: the present name is valid but so was the previous one. — LlywelynII 04:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caernarfon?? 

message: Aside from improved formatting, the additional points are all entirely valid and helpful to the reader for additional context. Was this just a kneejerk revert? or do the provided sources not include the additional detail and need to be corrected to something more accurate? Either way, reverting isn't the way to fix the problem. (Sorry the 'dubious' note on my edit was mistaken: That was from another article I'd been working on recently.) — LlywelynII 04:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistaken revert
Talk:Bendy bus

message: The term "bendy bus" is used for any articulated bus, not just the London ones.   Bendy bus should redirect to articulated bus, not the other way round, and the latter should deal with all articulated buses. Markalexander100 09:21, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure any redirect is a good idea on reflection. Bendy bus is the colloquial name.
N12345n
On reflection, you may be right.  I'd assumed we had a policy against slang terms as titles, but it seems we don't.  Fair enough. Markalexander100 00:31, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: This is a non-article and the information should be merged with articulated bus, Buses in London or both, and then redirected to the appropriate one of those two. Pcb21| Pete 10:48, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we call it "a bendy omnibus", since bus is an abbreviation?? N12345n 14:33, 2004 Nov 1 (UTC)
No! Markalexander100 02:01, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:EFL League One

message: If someone wants to check my working out, I make the first season of each team's current spell at this level as follows? - Cheers, Burwellian (Talk) 16:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longest tenure 

message: As a non follower of football, is 'tin pot league' a correct description. If so, does it need explaining further? Random56653 (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked up the phrase and it seems to be derogatory, so I've removed it for now. Random56653 (talk) 17:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

text: and removed the rest of the edit that added the phrase. Random56653 (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tin pot league
Talk:2004 Summer Olympics medal count for Central Asian countries

message: *For an August 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/2004 Summer Olympics medal count for countries ending in -stan.
*For a November 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/2004 Summer Olympics medal count for Central Asian countries
----
Just a few helpful comments
* medals and laurels going together, a redirect to Stan Laurels might have do the job.
* -dom is a synonym of -stan, and of -land in some ways. I don't understand why countries with those suffixes are not mentioned in the count.
* still no article about the Stan Union, that would justify the link with the EU count
* To my knowledge, 3 countries or states have -rica or -rico endings. Just a tip.
Hope it helps --Pgreenfinch 10:06, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: That's all ... 130.233.243.229 08:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is quite the most obsolete page ever
Talk:Telecommunications in Ukraine

message: Someone please specify what is "main lines in use". If it means "number of end users (i.e. number of telephones)" than this is false. Let's just remember that Ukrainian megacities with millions of population (such as Kyiv and Kharkiv) are almost entirely telephonized, and there is at least one line in every big village. AlexPU
:I find this number entirely plausible, one phone for about every four people. Don't forget that a good chunk of the population still live in villages. From personal experience there are only a few phones total in a village, this might have changed from 1999. Now, if everyone in a city had a phone, it's usually still one per home or family. Granted some families are smaller or bigger than four people, but the number seems about right. --Berkut 09:13, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Main lines in use

message: "Share of Chinese smartphones in Ukraine could become 60% by late 2014"; not sure this info is suitable for this Wikipedia article.... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 14:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Share of Chinese smartphones in Ukraine could become 60% by late 2014
Talk:Cheomseongdae

message: ...how exactly is that picture supposed to show me how the Cheomseongdae was used?  -- Visviva 15:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a new one last week. Enjoy. ZsinjTalk 14:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm... 

message: It should re-written to be oldest surviving Observatory in East Asia.--Korsentry 01:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest surviving Observatory in East Asia 

message: This article has pervasive use of uncited information supported by vague assertions like "Some claim..." "Some scholars have argued..." etc. —Notyourbroom (talk) 06:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:WEASEL]] 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Korea-Gyeongju-Cheomseongdae-02.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 23, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-12-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Korea-Gyeongju-Cheomseongdae-02.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Oligomeric proanthocyanidin

message: Moved page from "Oligomeric proanthrocyanidin", which is a misspelling. Securiger 12:40, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: This article is inconsistent. It claims at one point that OPCs do not occur in grape seed extract and then later on seems to have copied some marketing blurb from somewhere stating that it is indeed in grape seed extract. Looking at DrDukes Phytochemical database I can only see evidence of the fruits and skins of grapes containing "procyanidins" (OPCs?) and no association between the seeds and "procyanidins" (OPCs?). The article seems to deteriate in quality from where the hyperlinks stop.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drdobbin (talk • contribs) 23:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies 

message: I agree that these two categories need to be merged. Oligomeric Proanthocyanidin Complexes (OPC) is a sub-category of Proanthocyanidins. The information in each is pertinent to the other.--Barb1024 (talk) 15:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The article looks like it's trying to sell a product or something. I think one of the vendors has edited it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.52.215.78 (talk) 01:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising?
Talk:Charles Farrar Browne

message: This article is very silly. It is mostly about people who are not to be confused with the subject, thereby confusing the matter even more. It would have pleased Artemus Ward enormously. --80.88.220.6 09:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Silly 

message: y23  could you please double check whether or not it was 26 april? it says so in various other encylodediae  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.197.16.12 (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  exact birth date 

message: Would it be useful if this article dealt with the "Goak Here" notation attributed to Ward by A. J. P. Taylor? If you Google "Goak Here" you get lots of AJPT refs, but mostly only via-Taylor references to Ward, which seems odd. Could this situation be improved, I wonder, by someone who knew the subject? (e.g not me!) Thanks 138.37.199.206 (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goak Here 