lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nudie Cohn

message: I REMOVED THIS FROM THE PAGE: "Schoepen acquired for his amusement park Bobbejaanland in Belgium two peculiar white Pontiac cars, skilfully decorated with dollars and showweapens." What is are "showweapens"? Is it a phonetic spelling of "Schoepen" or is it "show weapons"? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Showweapens

message: "Nudie's enormous Van Nuys lot opened in 1963, and remained open until 1994."
I don't know what a "lot" is? A piece of land maybe or maybe his house? I haven't a clue. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: The external link to the supposed picture of Nudie and Elvis is dead. I'll see if I can find another copy of the pic online. MichaelCaricofe (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is another copy of the photo on Nudie's Find A Grave page. DoctorJoeE talk to me! 18:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: First, what is the English equivalent of Nuta? If it's a Yiddish name (which it most likely is), there very likely is an equivalent.
Second, why is the Ukrainian variant given, not Russian, if Kiev was a Tsarist Russian city back then? There were Ukrainian speakers among its inhabitants, the surnames in "-enko" are Ukrainian, but a Jewish family would've been more prone to use the official language of the state, Russian (when not speaking Yiddish, of course). 195.187.108.4 (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Kobayakawa Hideaki

message: Birth Date
Turnbull gives his birthdate as 1577, which is more realistic than the 1582 currently in place on the page.  He led an army in Korea in 1597.
Shirokuma1 17:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:UCL School of Pharmacy

message: (I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 00:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University ratings
Talk:Laura Veirs

message: Hmm. Googled and can't find anything much, except this page which seems to (by my guess) have been written in 2004, and says she's 30.  Hardly conclusive.  Not sure how to find out this info. --Generica 00:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, when is her birthday? Happily ever after 17:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Laura's age

message: I didn't know that was her singing, I assumed it was a female member of the band. Neat. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.211.67.46 (talk) 06:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  With the decemberists 

message: Can someone make Poor Man's Lisa Loeb link to Laura's page. Thanks.
:Nope, but I could do it the other way ;-) PLease sign your name with four tildes in future. Ade1982 01:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Man's Lisa Loeb 

message: I don't have time to work on this, and don't want to gut the page, but most of lede is directly copied from her Allmusic bio. Also don't want to edit conflict--note that there are two el sections right now. Katr67 (talk) 04:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks I tried to clean it up a little at least.--Omarcheeseboro (talk) 04:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for removing "such luminaries as", I'll sleep better tonight. :) Katr67 (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More copyvio
Talk:South Jutland County

message: The term South Jutland is a misleading translation - As Sydjylland (=South Jutland)in da. is the common way of referring to the southernmost part of Nørrejylland (Northern Jutland), ie not this county  which is the northernmost part of Sønderjylland (Southern Jutland - sama as the duchy of Slesvig/Schleswig).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.140.180 (talk) 16:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This paragrapg is a notable part of post-WW1 history of  Northern Schleswig. Language is not a reason of revert. If something is unclear, ask for clarification. The reference cited contains a more detailed text. - Altenmann >talk 21:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If text is expressed sufficiently poorly it is difficult to specify individual elements for clarification, though I've made attempts as to what may be intended. I'll note that it is not just errors in language use but the numerous typos in your article text, edit summary and the text above indicate a need to exercise more care. As South Jutland was not part of Denmark at the time, the Danish cartoon is neither about S Jutland or people from S Jutland, so is not pertinent to this article. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Caricature: After a careful reading of the source, I see that the caricature dates 1917 and it ridicules the idea of W/S Councils in Denmark, so I agree it does not belong here. May be in the section of the history of Social Democrats (Denmark) or , of course, if reasonable text will be found. But I did like the funny picture :-)- Altenmann >talk 23:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:   Danish Workers' and Soldiers' Councils
Talk:Stronghold Legends

message: I added this tag because this article is not very well set-up. It doesn't flow very well and there are some grammar mistakes. I feel like this article should be more fluid and organized so the reader only has to read the information they were looking for w/o having to read the entire article. I have yet to play this game and know nothing about it outside the basic details... so I am not an expert on the topic (I played and loved the previous games, but I'm not going to bother with this one because it removed the best parts of the original two). --Renegade Replicant 00:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of the "copyedit" tag 

message: I believe this article has been heavily vandalized. I would fix it myself, but I don't know enough about Wikipedia article writing to do much to help. Someone TOTALLY had their way with this thing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.30.157.37 (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Copper(II) azide

message: I've finially perservered!  I have been trying for some while and finially I have made this article without it being deleted.  For some reason everyone hates this article, and if you think that it's because the article looks sorry it's because I've been slowly losing fate in putting this article up.  It used to be much better looking but now I may need somehelp...--Douglas Bradford Oliver 00:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:First Matabele War

message: I editted the introduction to give it a more neutral point of view and added a reference.--Cellocellocello 07:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At the end of Start of the war it says that the magazine was blown up by the advancing pioneers, leading to the destruction of Bulawayo.  But in the section Destruction of Bulawayo is says that it was Lobengula who blew up the magazine, in order to deny its use to the pioneers.  Would it be possible to either establish who did the destruction, or to make the two sections consistent?
:To clarify, it was blown up by Lobengula when he burned the town and left. —Cliftonian (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It should definitely say one way or the other. I'm having trouble figuring out what is actually being used as a reference here, is it supposed to be a book? A few of the references are done in this way, and I can't tell what any of them are, who wrote them, or where to find them. Greedo8 17:23, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of this was copy-and-pasted from the Shangani Patrol article, which I wrote, but it seems somebody got confused interpreting the source as I have just looked again to be sure and it does not say the pioneers blew it up. To clarify again it was Lobengula who blew it up—it was the tradition of the Matabele nation to destroy the old royal town whenever the seat of the monarch moved, so when the king retreated from his city he deliberately burned it down. I will alter the article now to make this clear. Thanks for bringing this up. —Cliftonian (talk) 17:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, it makes alot more sense now. I'm still confused about the sources though. Greedo8 18:22, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destruction of Bulawayo 
Talk:List of Celestials

message: A much needed tidy-up is called for here. Weak collqiual language; incorrect formatting and missing information. Asgardian (talk) 08:25, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I created this page way, way back when the info was removed from the main article. Feel free to have a go at fixing it up! BOZ (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidy-Up 

message: There are two 'One Above All's in the Marvel Universe. There is the Earth 616 One Above All, who is a Celestial (http://marvel.wikia.com/One_Above_All_(Earth-616)), and then there is the almighty multiversal One-Above-All, who is essentially the central god and most powerful character in all of the entire Marvel Multiverse (http://marvel.wikia.com/One-Above-All_(Multiverse)). The article on the latter seems to have been displaced by this article, confusing the two 'One Above All's.
Krodh (talk) 04:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will find a better place to redirect that one to. 108.69.80.43 (talk) 04:47, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding The One Above All 

message: The section has been removed since it is unclear if this is a one-shot cameo character, a miss-coloring, or a misreading. If there is a reliable, verifiable source that this is a separate character from Arishem - the text here and elsewhere imply that the penciled and inked art was that character and either the colorist or printer goofed - it can be re-added. Otherwise it reads as OR.
- J Greb (talk) 15:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monolith Gatherer 

message: In doing some clean up I ran across a number of problem entries. These include:
*The Blue Celestial
*Devron the Experimenter
*Ea the Wise
*Gamiel the Manipulator
*Monolith Gatherer
*The Red Celestial
*The Red/Blue Judge
*Scathan the Approver
All of them as they originally stood looked like they were cribbed from the Marvel Database. The Monolith Gather section I've mentioned above since even the Marvel Database notes that it may never have appeared. And most of the rest can be, or have been, copy edited down.
The Red/Blue Judge though... can anyone provide the first appearance an creators or is this like the Monolith Gatherer?
- J Greb (talk) 22:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red/Blue Judge
Talk:Urracá

message: "In his honor, the National Association of Panama calls Scout Urracá the highest rank given to those who have showed their to the community."
Something is obviously missing here.  If it were properly cited, we could possibly go and see what, but there's no reference given for any of that section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.11.101 (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In his honor, the Asociación Nacional de Scouts de Panamá calls Scout Urracá the highest rank awarded to those who have made outstanding community service. (Referenced) Krenakarore TK 20:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showed their what?
Talk:Astrotech Corporation

message: The Article is very much written like an advertisement.  Was there a spacehab page that was deleted and this article put in its place? --50.44.176.177 (talk) 23:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: Came here from sts 107. There are so many corporate buzzwords in this article it needs to be cleaned up. Their PR dept wrote most of it, didn't they?
This is en Wikipedia. Not corporatespeak Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia. Not a PR release platform.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.179.15 (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate buzzwords 

message: Article has no details at all on "Logistics Single Module (LSM) and Logistics Double Module (LDM)
Single Module (SM) and Research Double Module (RDM), pressurized" - dimensions and mass ? eg. to compare with the ISS MPLMs - Rod57 (talk) 09:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No details on the larger Shuttle payload modules
Talk:Pterodactyloidea

message: Bennett (pers. comm. cited in Bennett 2007) considers Mesadactylus to be an anurognathid, with referred specimens belonging to Pterodactyloidea. If Mesadactylus does belong to Anurognathidae, then it would represent the first anurognathid from North America.
Bennett, S. C. (2007). "Reassessment of Utahdactylus from the Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27(1): 257–260. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mesadactylus
Talk:Rhamphorhynchoidea

message: "Rhamphorhynchoidea" is regarded by virtually all pterosaur workers as ployphyletic and should not be used in pterosaur classification since it basically means any pterosaur that is not a rhamphorhynchoid. Apatomerus 16:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really, polypheltic? i've never heard that. I know it's universally seen as paraphyletic, but this is stated in the text (no doubt you've read the article). Contrary to popular belief, paraphyletic groups are not invalid under all classification schemes, only phylogenetic ones. Note that there are different sections for classifiaction and phylogeny. Dinoguy2 21:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gah! Paraphyletic rather, I got the two mixed up, but I still feel that it should not be used. The term is becoming abandoned by most workers. Yes, I did read the article, and I feel that it is far too favourable of an outdated scheme, only making a brief mention at the end of the classification used by virtually all pterosaur workers while attributing a classification that uses "rhamphorhynchoidea" to Unwin, who never has used the term as far as I can recall. I suppose it boils down to Linnean vs. cladistics, and I really want to  see the Linnean system done away with as it does not reflect evolutionary relations.  Apatomerus 22:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer using both in a complimentary manner. Unwin does use Rhapmhporhynchoidea in his popular book Pterosaurs: From Deep Time, actually. It's a handy, even if informal, term to refer to basal pterosaurs. Dinoguy2 22:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if one wishes to discuss the these critters, there's really no other way. Strict phylogenetic naming won't let us define them (there's no crown group, and the stem contains everything more related to pterosaurs than to dinos (possibly, the tree isn't entirely clear at this point). Petter Bøckman (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They can be perfectly defined, and this definition produces a perfect name for them: non-pterodactyloid pterosaurs :o).--MWAK (talk) 19:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphyletic Rhamphorhynchoidea
Talk:Germanodactylus

message: Vidovic and Martill (http://www.miketaylor.org.uk/dino/pubs/svpca2011/SVPCA2011-abstracts.pdf) argue for a re-appraisal of the taxoomy of "Germanodactylus" rhamphastinus, noting that the two species of Germanodactylus are recovered in the cladistic analysis of Kellner (2003) in a polytomy with Pterodactylus and Ctenochasmatidae, but are recovered as dsungaripteroids in the cladistic study of Unwin (2003). 68.4.61.168 (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germanopterus rhamphastinus
Talk:Tapejaridae

message: I saw right after I took Chao and Jida out of the genera box, where that had come from: Unwin's book.  The ref I added disagrees, and includes Unwin as an author. Lü and Ji 2006 also disagrees, putting those two farther down the azdarchoid line. J. Spencer 02:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My alterations 

message: : Tapejaridae (meaning "the old beings")
In what language? —Tamfang (talk) 06:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymon 

message: The taxobox still says "possible" record post-Cenomonian. However, with Caiuajara, there is no reason to doubt their presence to that point.  Lusotitan (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Late Cretaceous 

message: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667120301737
Paywalled natch.©Geni (talk) 02:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Paper on the Isle of Wight find
Talk:Azhdarchidae

message: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article4015294.ece  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.201.174 (talk) 11:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, this is one of my favorite prehistoric animal families and I plan to add a lot of content, including based on the new paper, but of course anybody who wants to beat me to the punch should go right ahead! I already added a bit based on this to Pterosaur under Ground movement. Dinoguy2 (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  walked more than it flew 

message: I found all studies place Alanqa as a Azhdarchid not thalassodromidae since the Mistralazhdarcho paper mentioned Alanqa is a Azhdarchid, so can we fix taxonomy of Amanda and Aerotitan?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.237.203.92 (talk) 00:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing to fix? Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 02:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alanqa and Aerotitan
Talk:Georgia Institute of Technology Historic District

message: Note that much of the text of this article is copied verbatim from the National Park Service website. My understanding is that the National Park Service is a federal agency in the United States, and therefore its works are not copyrighted. MaxVeers 21:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However, it should be either rewritten to conform to our manual of style, and/or acknowledged. It isn't any less plaigiaristic because the text isn't copyrighted. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright note
Talk:Genève-Cornavin railway station

message: The article title, text, and infobox are a little confused as to whether this station is called Genève-Cornavin, Genève, or Geneva. A few pointers:
* On the station information pages, SBB calls the station Genf Cornavin (in German), Genève Cornavin (in French), Ginevra Cornavin (in Italian), and Geneva Cornavin (in English).
* The departure plan drops the "Cornavin" (the plan is in French; SBB uses the preferred local language for these documents).
* The line timetables (151 is representative) say Genève.
* The TPG service map says "Genève" for the station and "Gare Cornavin" for the adjoining bus/tram station.
* The trafimage plan also drops the Cornavin for the station itself, though it's visible elsewhere.
* Regarding the spelling of the name, where the name varies according to the language SBB is in the habit of using that name as well, and that's generally been the practice on the English Wikipedia as well. Examples include  and . Spelling of the title on other projects is inconsistent, for example :de:Bahnhof Genève-Cornavin (not Bahnhof Genf-Cornavin) on the German Wikipedia but :it:Stazione di Ginevra Cornavin on the Italian Wikipedia.
I think the proper location of this article is either Geneva railway station (already a redirect here). or Genève railway station. Mackensen (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:First Presbyterian Church (Edmonton)

message: This to reply to the prod from Prague...
more to come....
Bacl-presby 01:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I was working on another artice relating to Edmonton and note the Edmonton neighbourhood of McQueen appears to be named after a Rev. G. D. McQueen who arrived in Edmonton in 1887.  This is information on the neighbourhood description in the City's map utility.  The First Presbyterian Church article talks about a David George McQueen who also arrived in Edmonton in 1887, and who is presumably the same person.  Can we firm up the correct order of his given names.  That is, is it David George or is it George David?66.48.175.56 23:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Resolution 
Talk:Lorraine Vélez

message: A reader requested a change in spelling from Loraine to Lorraine. I noticed that the references, while not reliable sources, did use the single "r". The reader explained that she used the single "r" early in life, but changed a number of years ago.
Several recent sources, support the doubled "r" including:
* http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2006/nov/12/theatre
* http://www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/porgybessnunn-rev
* http://www.thestage.co.uk/listings/production.php/21320/porgy-and-bess
* http://www.curtainup.com/porgyandbesslond.html
* http://www.whatsonstage.com/west-end-theatre/reviews/11-2006/porgy-and-bess_21821.html
* http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/nicola-hughes-and-lorraine-velez-attend-the-porgy-and-bess-news-photo/72487754
* http://www.latinosports.com/theater-review-dc-7-the-roberto-clemente-story-hits-a-grand-slam-at-its-premiere-2/
* http://www.latina.com/entertainment/arts/exclusive-lorraine-velez-dishes-her-new-play-roberto-clemente-story
* http://voices.suntimes.com/?s=clemente%3A+the+legend
* http://chicagostagestandard.com/reviews/theater-reviews/clemente-the-legend-of-21-night-blue-performing-arts-company/
* http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/clemente-the-legend-of-21/Event?oid=14642065
* http://premiosace.org/Ganadores.htm
I've also included the sources as they may be useful to editors interested in expanding the article.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:John Peet (born 1954)

message: :(Moved this text from article. -- Petri Krohn 02:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the general public might have something else to say. Claims that subject is "irrelevant" (not simply not-notable) seems to imply this editor has a bone to pick with Peet. TheQuandry 04:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is relevant in WP. I did however remove some vanity statements and obsolete links. -Chincoteague (talk) 17:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to delete article 

message: Hi, I am not able to move articles yet, can someone move this to a proper naming convention? Thank you. Kindzmarauli (talk) 00:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is proper. There are two John Peets who are journalists. —fetch·comms 00:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, ok nevermind then. Kindzmarauli (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 
Talk:Eddie Cicotte

message: I could be wrong but it looks like 272 edits involving 134 editors since 2002 and no references or tags? I added two references but there needs to be more. I can understand a new article or a new editor but this article has been around awhile and the editors involved have multiple thousands of edits. Who knows maybe this one just got swept under the rug. I would hope that editors are now more astute at following Wikipedia Policies and guidelines concerning sources, references, and with the lack thereof, in using tags. Maybe there needs to be a new category called "stagnant start class articles"?. Otr500 (talk) 15:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: :Category:American people of French-Canadian descent should be added.
69.157.92.130 (talk) 01:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 6 August 2013
Talk:Lew Cody

message: "Playing the debonnaire leading man, Cody enjoyed the later single life of "a man's man", which added to his acting persona"
What does that even mean? Also "debonaire" is misspelled. 2A02:AA1:1629:6E2B:C1A0:5E7F:D67E:27D7 (talk) 04:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  enjoyed the later single life