lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:International Mid-Continent Trade Corridor

message: NASCO clearly states that they are not building a superhighway and that the so called "superhighway" is I-35. In fact, the goal is to improve upon the existing corridor. Here is a quote from their website.
"NAFTA Superhighway" - As of late, there has been much media attention given to the "new, proposed NAFTA Superhighway". NASCO and the cities, counties, states and provinces along our existing Interstate Highways 35/29/94 (the NASCO Corridor) have been referring to I-35 as the 'NAFTA Superhighway' for many years, as I-35 already carries a substantial amount of international trade with Mexico, the United States and Canada. There are no plans to build a new NAFTA Superhighway - it exists today as I-35. " About NASCO
 Jaylweb 05:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Interview with the Assassin

message: This film is presented in a pure documentary style, a fake with no disclaimers other than that implied by credit to writers and cast.  There are no comedic elements.  In my opinion, a mockumentary is a comedic false documentary: a parody or satire in documentary style, such as This is Spinal Tap, Best in Show, or The Life and Hard Times of Guy Terrifico.  Why wouldn't this movie be better described as a fictional documentary-style suspense film? — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your classification is correct Shii (tock) 05:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  correctly classified?
Talk:Intocable

message: Article was a terrible mess. I've improved tone, style and got rid of the worst POV issues. I can't do more, as I have insufficient knowledge of the subject. Centrepull (talk) 10:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement 

message: I added this section back in, as it was removed without any explanation. The members of a musical group are quite important and it makes even less sense to mention the former members without listing the current ones. 71.56.74.255 (talk) 18:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Members

message: Can someone verify that he was indeed a member of the band? He's not listed on the spanish version and I wasn't able to find anything about him on google. (All I could find was pages copying material from this page) Thanks. 71.56.74.255 (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jose Perez?
Talk:KWAX

message: There used to be a mention of teh fact that the call-letters of the station were originally pronounced "quacks" -- an allusion to the University of Oregon's mascot, the fighting duck.  At some point this got changed to the current pronunciation of "K-WAX" (kay - wax); not sure when, but it was already entranched by the mid 1980s.
https://worldradiohistory.com/call_letters.htm
https://www.nwascopud.org/cracking-the-call-letter-code/
https://www.mondotimes.com/1/world/us/37/2046/14507
Reference to this seems to have vanished from the article, however.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quacks
Talk:Opinions Won't Keep You Warm at Night

message: "John Howard was included because Kisschasy is from Australia." Isn't John Howard included because it's a statement about the relationship between Blair, Bush and Howard/their respective countries? This, to me, seemed like it was saying that Howard shouldn't have been in it, and was tacked on "just because". Ticattack 23:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It appears there was an alternate, non-political video made, of the band walking around Western Sydney International Dragway while a Drag Race meeting is in progress. --Falcadore (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternate video 
Talk:Drizzle

message: I find it silly that this article is a stub. I do not find it to be an appropriate tag. If there are not any objections, I would like to remove it. WiiAlbanyGirl 23:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this *really* also another word for drizzle? I've never heard it - do we need a citation, or is it a common word I've just never heard of?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edam (talk • contribs) 09:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mizzle!? 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mizzle. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Onel5969 TT me 12:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mizzle" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:KINK

message: Can we source KBCO as being legendary? Until we can, i'm removing it under NPOV. Gilgamesh Rex 22:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legendary?

message: When clicking on the "Lights Out" link, the disambiguation page shows only one radio program, a suspense/thriller story-telling show of the same name.  KINK's show features a couple of hours of world music, no lyrics, and certainly no adrenalin.  Selected music pieces often feature piano, flute, guitar, ethnic instruments, or any combination of those.  Often, the program features a natural element, such as a "Rain Set" or an "Ocean Set". The KINK website describes the program as a "relaxing blend of music"() --Alenanoemi (talk) 04:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Individual regional radio programs probably don't merit their own articles so this should be unlinked. Katr67 (talk) 06:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Lights Out" disambiguation link doesn't have any information about the actual program.
Talk:Sonnet 138

message: Yeah, so all that stuff that has been primped on the last few edits from the unknown IP has been reverted to the last version to make sense.  I'll keep reverting until there seems to be a tighter or at least attributed version of this page that doesn't talk at length about parables.  It seems like somebody just put in their English class paper as the article?  Maybe not?  Weird.  Macman202 (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:UK Citizens Online Democracy

message: I have just added a load of text to this article (diff). I am a trustee and director of UKCOD and, as such, suffer a conflict of interest here. Having populated the article, using text from UKCOD's website (which should be made public very soon), I intend only to make NPOV edits to this article from now on.
The text is almost directly copy/pasted from our website. The text on our website is CC-licenced, ergo this is not a copyright violation. If any Wikipedian wishes to discuss this further, or to list the page for deletion or copyvio, please could you email me or add a note to my Talk: page to let me know. Thanks! — OwenBlacker 23:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the interest of transparency, I should point out that I have updated the list of trustees (of which I am one). I've added citations to the list, to avoid any claims of POV edits or conflicts of interest. If any Wikipedian would like to discuss these edits, please add a note to my Talk: page, so that my attention is drawn to the matter; I find it very difficult to keep on top of my watchlist, so might otherwise miss any edits. Thanks again! — OwenBlacker (Talk) 12:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have updated the list of trustees again, with updated citations. Again, if any Wikipedian would like to discuss these edits, please add a note to my Talk: page, so that my attention is drawn to the matter; I do not monitor my watchlist, so might otherwise miss any edits. Thanks again! — OwenBlacker (Talk) 13:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:COI|Conflict of interest]] and copyright
Talk:Bushbury railway station

message: The coordinates point to Four Ashes. This is probably wrong for Bushbury Station. It is not near Showell Road/Bushbury Lane as per article. Any proof of the real location?Oosoom Talk 15:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Better coordfinates estimated from description of location at http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/articles/bushbury/19thcent.htm "Bushbury Station was opened to passengers on August 2nd 1852. It was situated between the two main lines at the junction and was approached by a footpath from the road bridge in Bushbury Lane behind the signal box." Oosoom Talk 20:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After seeing this thread and asking my grannie who lived there, she confirmed it was on the junction just past the bridge. She said there wasn't a station but a platform but wasn't sure if was for public or materials but said the Queen visited the Goodyear factory via there. I imagine it would have been where the Gala Bingo building was....putting my Sherlock hat on....the Railway club is still there too which would add up. Onkarr Sandhu 94.6.218.26 (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Rags to Riches (race horse)

message: This is very awkward in my opinion.
There's a lot more to be said than this.68.100.190.56 23:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely, but the article was just created today. It's going to take a little time to make the article stronger. Amphy 01:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sonnet 154

message: Could anyone confirm the Polish numbering of this Sonnet, as it is linked to  ? I would have guessed the numbering wouldn't depend on the language...
If it's not correct, could anyone update the interwiki-link? Thanks, RonnieV (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem has been solved by a Polish Wikipedian. Thanks again. RonnieV (talk) 13:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Schweizer S333

message: Sikorsky officially launched the news of their development of the S-434 at Heli-Expo '08. 
*Article at FlightGlobal.com
*Sikorsky's S-434 page
--Born2flie (talk) 19:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice. How long before some over-eager editor puts up a page? SHould we beat them to it, or just stick with a redirect here for now? - BillCJ (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schweizer 434 

message: This article begins by claiming its a light piston helicopter, but then goes to spend the rest of the time talking about turbo-shaft engines  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.196.3.48 (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Where exactly does it say that? I can't find it. - BilCat (talk) 00:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Piston engine?
Talk:Iraq Medal (Australia)

message: The introduction to this article used to read:
:The Iraq Medal was established by the Australian Prime Minister John Howard on Anzac Day 2004.
I've removed the reference to Anzac Day, as the itsanhonour.gov.au site states that the medal was announced by the PM on Anzac Day 2004, but the Gazette, and the sidebar for the article, shows it was actually established later.
I've made a similar change to the Afghanistan Medal (Australia) page.
Sir rupert orangepeel (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Nford24, according to the Department of Defence  2 ADF officers remain deployed in Iraq as part of Operation Riverbank. As this operation represents qualifying service for the Iraq Medal  it seems to me that this medal is still being awarded, albeit in small numbers. If this is incorrect pls provide a reference to show that it is no longer awarded, or at the least some explaination of your edits. Anotherclown (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently awarded 
Talk:The Greatest (TV series)

message: "100 Greatest Songs of the 80's" the 5-hour episode only on VH1, on Monday October 30, 2006 at 10PM/9 Central. 71.247.208.187 (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ladies.. and Gentlemen..: VH1's "100 Greatest Songs of the 80's"
Talk:Vanasthalipuram

message: Once a beautiful place with lushgreen trees everywhere but now everything is gone 
so i request you all from now on if we not take care of the environment ,gone guys nothing will be left over there will be tuff times ahead so guys be aware and please take iniative and save our environment ,save our mother earth. 
                                        
                                       guys please do understand  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.16.5.109 (talk) 11:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  just read this
Talk:Graph invariant

message: "Graph Theory" (Reinhard Diestel, 2005, Springer-Verlag) defines a graph invariant as a class of graphs that is closed under isomorphism.
A graph invariant is defined as a map taking graphs as arguments which assign equal values to isomorphic graphs.
Is this an agreed-upon definition? Should the difference be noted in the article? 84.137.96.26 20:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between variant and property?
Talk:Bookmobile

message: I'm not entirely certain if this is the correct place to mention such a thing, but wikipedia was the first place I came to in my search for information.  Is there any site on the net that provides a list of bookmobiles and similar services across the globe?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.254.128 (talk) 06:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found this on a google search. Obviously not a very extensive list, but maybe someday it will be better. Clamshell (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Bookmobiles? 

message: Have you also looked at http://childrensmobilelibraries.blogspot.com ... someone else is setting out to do a Doctorate on children's bookmobiles Victuallers (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Children's Mobile Research

message: Bookmobiles are just one type of mobile library. I think Mobile library deserves its own article, to accommodate other forms e.g. ship libraries, bike services, pop-up libraries, etc. -- M2545 (talk) 15:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to be careful to clearly delineate between, on one hand, library collections that travel because they transport books between institutions located at fixed sites and on the other, mobile libraries that literally move from place to place, as you described. Of course, we need to also determine how to classify those that fall between the cracks, such as the Library Train for Homeless Children in Thailand, which is located on three cars of a train that is permanently parked. Froid (talk) 16:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This 1994 article has useful info. -- M2545 (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

text: I agree that its not productive to have two articles where 90% of the history will be relevant to both. Creating a mobile library/book mobile article would be a great improvement with redirects from all the similar terms. Victuallers (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile library 
Talk:Mars and Beyond

message: The description here is virtually identical to a write-up on IMDB, right down to Disney's "friend" and the failure to mention Wernher von Braun. I suspect one person provided the same text to both sites, but it could be copyvio. I haven't watched this closely enough or recently enough to rewrite the text, but someone should. Thanks! --Karen | Talk | contribs 03:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Equine metabolic syndrome

message: Yes, the article does need a lot of work! I've done a bitto make it clearer that it IS NOT Cushings, I'll do more ASAP.
Dlh-stablelights 08:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I must say that I have had quite a lot of success treating EMS horses with cyproheptadine, although (as my cite points out) dietary restriction etc may prove a confounding factor. However, some of the results have been so dramatic that I intend to continue using it until someone can prove that it doesn't work!
Dlh-stablelights 21:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 5, 2005

message: The image on this page is available under a non commercial only license and is soon to be deleted (see discussion on Commons). I have replaced the article image with :Image:Cat03.jpg which is suitably free (and cute). I suggest the image on this page should match the new article image. -N 00:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Line of battle

message: From "Development of the Line of Battle":
"the natural tendency in the design of galleons was for longer ships with lower castles"
What is a ship castle?  I think this should be clarified, or linked to an appropriate article (I checked the castle article and the castle disambiguation but couldn't find a relevant article).
24.21.149.53 (talk) 23:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a (ship) Castle? 

message: Doubt has to be cast over the intentions of Vasco de Gama in 1503 and of Tromp in 1639 when they are alleged to have form the line of battle.  Granted there is debate but whether it was merely good fortune or simply a primitive form which may have stumbled upon by any numerous sea captains on numerous occasions is not clear.  What is clear is the Blake's instructions shows the first organised system for the employment of the line of battle and from that we can assume that the English are indeed the true pioneers of this tactic.  Even by the second Anglo-Dutch war the Dutch had still not adopted the line of battle fully so we can be assured that Tromp's pioneering role is indeed limited.  The statement had not been properly sourced in any case so I removed it.  --84.70.76.156 (talk) 16:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins 

message: A redirect also needs to cove Battle Lines or Lines of Battle in land warfare, since that is discussed greatly.  It is inappropriate to label Line of Battle as purely a naval term. This should be corrected.
:I don't think I've ever heard of a "battle line" in land warfare being described as a tactic per se. The naval tactic is a lot more complicated and requires far more advanced organization than lining up troops side by side on land. Can you refer to any elaboration of the line as a land-based tactic?
:Peter Isotalo 18:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line of Battle in Land Warfare 

message: The tactics described "Effective Use" section have nothing to do with Crossing the T, and describe its inverse. Crossing the T is a misnomer and a neologism when applied to sailing warships. This whole section applies to *exceptions* to the doctrine of the Line of Battle.24.39.5.202 (talk) 15:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Crossing the T" 

message: What am I failing to understand here? Why is this not the most moronically self-defeating 'tactic' ever conceived? What could be more stupid than exposing your vessel - and to the greatest possible extent - to the enemy's cannon fire? Why not place your cannons fore and aft, face the enemy, and make yourself the smallest target possible?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.151.210.84 (talk) 12:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:The City Gardener

message: Euonymous alatus "winged-spindle"  was one of the first plants Matt James ever successfully propigated.   I saw him mention that on "Urban Outsiders"... He is a very clever utilizer of space.  Not sure how they get all that hardscaping done for the money along with the plants on his programs... but he does make a pretty landscape.  
Greeninches 01:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kurt Suzuki

message: I think that this article needs a lot of work. It violates WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NPOV, and has a lot of grammar and capitalization problems, which I will try to fix. The picture is also not in its right place but I don't know how to move it. Perhaps an infobox would be needed. I will start fixing some obvious problems but more help is needed for this article to meet Wikipedia's standards. Canjth 01:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed some of those things. Image is in the right place though it looks odd and can probably still be improved. Removed speculation. Mrhsj 05:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A political affiliation for a mainstream in-country candidate is not a noteworthy nor interesting characteristic of a pro-athlete without outside political involvement. I reviewed the other pages for Washington Nationals players and no politics are mentioned for any of them, despite several of them likely holding political opinions and probably even on occasion wearing campaign merchandise. Making a special note of his donning a MAGA hat is at best irrelevant and at worst a low-level shunning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.225.114 (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It was at the White House, it got a lot of coverage, it's notable, and any mention of it should be written carefully in a neutral fashion and well-cited. – Athaenara  ✉  23:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trump support: Relevancy?
Talk:Arizona flagstone

message: I have created several links, but I don't know how to remove message.Bmhtayl 01:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag indicates that there are no links FROM other Wikipedia articles TO this article. You can see that by clicking "What links here" on the left while viewing the article. Thus, the message should not be deleted, but if it were appropriate to delete it, you could do that by simply editing the article to remove the line of text at the top with the word orphan in it. Propaniac 20:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:NSS-8

message: "coverage to two-thirds of the planet" needs clarification.  It can't possibly mean two thirds of Earth's total surface area as it would have only had a view of somewhat less than half.  But does that mean 2/3 of the land area or 2/3 of the human population?  Strikes me as it was a marketing phrase, not suitable for an encyclopedia without further clarification.  --J Clear (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two thirds of what?
Talk:NZR RM class (Midland)

message: We would like to add a photo. But all the photos we know of are still within copyright, and the railcar has not been preserved so we can't take our own to show on this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vogel Era (talk • contribs) 08:43, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

message: Looking through contemporaneous newspaper listings at this archive, I can see little support for the idea that "rail motor" was unused and that .  Railmotor and its variants appear to be seen as an old-fashioned usage as time goes by, but the ratio of cites is about one-to-two.  Anmccaff (talk) 14:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railcar vs rail-car, vs. rail cas vs rail motor vs rail-motor vs railmotor 

message: The start of revenue service has been changed, using a cite which does not detail this. Anmccaff (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning of service 
Talk:Daddy's Boy (House)

message: Could anyone tell me the song name when the boy is at the party? Thanks in advance! Dr Alcohol 19:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The logo on House's motorcycle jacket changes from "KTAI Sports" (in the scene where House first enters the office) to "RTAI Sports" (in the next scene, when House is in the car park) Daen 01:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuity

message: Princeton may not have fraternities, but it could always be an unofficial one (I don't think they say a specific name).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.69.154.18 (talk) 18:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs - Fraternities at Princeton 

message: This should really be a dab page: In ictu oculi (talk) 23:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Move back to (House)
Talk:NZR RM class (Silver Fern)

message: It's currently listed, somewhat ludicrously, as "(?)". Might I be so bold as to suggest it's probably about 23.7m? Surely there must be some kind of source we can find for this? 46.208.118.226 (talk) 00:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately NZ Railfan's rolling stock register of 2011 doesn't list the individual carriage length, only the length of the entire unit. Surely something to add in the next version. pcuser42 (talk) 05:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual car length?