lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A Dedicated Man

message: oh come on, give me a chance Barbara Osgood 22:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080312020051/http://www.inspectorbanks.com/books/a-dedicated-man/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:1559

message: If you click on the picture of the hurricane, it takes you to a page with links to Hurricane Katrina, not some 1559 hurricane. I will promptly remove it, but you can revert if you have any objections.  --Patar knight 22:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Heather (fabric)

message: I found a link describing the process of the interweave that leads to this sort of yarn, including pictures of the process.   While it's surely insufficient to advance it past a stub, it does uphold the description otherwise.
http://rovingcrafters.com/2016/08/31/how-heathered-yarns-are-made/
  -- Starshine, not logged in. 2001:420:293:1264:5DF:10A8:BC64:D4D3 (talk) 18:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

message: Can anyone add history of heather and where the term and technique originated. 174.28.254.107 (talk) 23:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Can someone please post a close-up of the fabric?  This just looks like a celebrity photo with a blue shirt.  Thanks! 172.58.38.170 (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  better picture?
Talk:Perdido Pass

message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2z1G9LBA2k
This area is a productive fishing spot but is difficult to access, either on foot or by boat. It's quite a walk and shallow water, submerged rocks, unpredictable currents and the tide keep most anglers off these rocks. 
*ESPN films a fishing tournament in this area.(red fish/Drum)
*All the park structures are new post Katrina
*The bridge is a popular walking / jogging / biking route
*The Marine Police Station is located under the bridge 
*The speed limit of 45 mph is strictly enforced at all times
*There are shaded Parking places under the bridge
*Open wifi access
*Webcams monitor this area
Just getting it started Joey Eads 14:06, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The East Jetty is being repaired by the Army corp of Engineers (April 2008)  Joey Eads (talk) 22:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 

message: I have copied over content from Perdido Key about the historic relocation of the pass. Donald Albury 00:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New History section
Talk:Khirbet Sharta

message: Dear User talk: El C, if you have a justification for deleting the external link to biblewalks.com, please explain it here.  I included it because it's the only place on the Internet that has firsthand photos & firsthand descriptions of Khirbet Sharta.  If I don't hear from you within a few days, I'm planning to revert your deletion.--Funhistory 22:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed several instances of an masse insertion of biblewalk links; this one was removed by accident. El_C 00:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BibleWalks.com
Talk:In Haven

message: I can find nothing that mentions "Lute Song" in connection with "Love alone will stay" (later revised as "In Haven") in Elgar literature other than in Michael Kennedy's "Portrait of Elgar", which as follows:
Page 311: Index, Solo Songs: "LOVE ALONE WILL STAY (LUTE SONG) 47, 71, 283". 
Page 47: passing reference to 'Love Alone will Stay'. 
Page 71: About Sea Pictures: "One of then, No. 2, 'In Haven' to words by Alice Elgar, had been written as early as 30 May 1897, when it was called 'Love Alone will Stay' and had been published as 'Lute Song' in The Dome in January 1898."  [No, it wasn't]
Page 283: Chrononogical List of Works at the back of his book:  "1897 Choral and vocal: Song, Love Alone Will Stay (Lute Song) (C. A. Elgar), for voice and pianoforte.  Written 30 May 1897.  Publisher: The Dome, 1898. Revised, orchestrated, and corporated inot Sea Pictures, op. 37, No. 2, 1899 as In Haven (Capri).
I have The Dome published New Year's Day mdcccxcviii with me here: It is in the Inventory and on page 90 as 'Love Alone will Stay'. 'Lute Song' is not mentioned.  Therefore I removed reference to "Lute Song" from the pages "Love alone will stay" and "In Haven (Capri)". P0mbal (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you should write to Michael Kennedy via his publishers. If the book goes to a further edition then he can make a correction. Good work BTW! Nunquam Dormio (talk) 09:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lute Song? 

message: We have a very similar page to this for Love alone will stay. Is there a point to keeping them separate or should we merge Love alone will stay into this article? Nunquam Dormio (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They were published on separate occasions - one gave birth to the other.  A constructive idea.  Merge if you like, but obviously Love alone will stay should redirect to In Haven. P0mbal (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Love alone will stay]] 
Talk:Where Corals Lie

message: I have removed the following from just below the lead.
        "This song was a great favourite in Britain – see Your Hundred Best Tunes."
1.) While it seems to be true, though "great favourite" is a fuzzy statement, its inclusion in that position seems out of proportion to the importance of what it is saying.
2.) It happens to be the only one of the 100 best tunes wikilinking to the 100 Best Tunes page, though some **composers** (e.g. Ketèlbey) of the tunes link to it.
3.)  I can't think of an existing (or non-existing) paragraph in the article that the statement would nicely fit into.
P0mbal (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the Hundred Best Tunes
Talk:Geoffrey Sayre-McCord

message: Sayre-McCord is widely recognized as among the important contributors to recent work in metaethics.  Perhaps the most appropriate evidence here is that he showed up early on on the Wikipedia entry for moral realism.  He is also the invited author of the entries on moral realism and metaethics for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and frequently cited there by other articles.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 1947DB (talk • contribs) 
:You need to back this up with reliable, independent sources.  dcandeto 22:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant notability guideline can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (academics). AecisBrievenbus 22:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is not cited as a source in the article.  The article, as it currently is, does not assert any of the three criteria.  dcandeto 23:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: An important pillar of Wikipedia, 1947DB (welcome to Wikipedia, btw), is verifiability. Any user needs to be able to check any piece of information for himself or herself, against given sources. That's why those sources need to be cited. If you can indicate which independent sources see Geoffrey Sayre-McCord as "a significant expert" and "an important figure", and which "significant and well-known academic work" Geoffrey Sayre-McCord has published, the notability will probably be asserted sufficiently. AecisBrievenbus 23:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Another important thing that should probably be mentioned, is that simply being notable is not enough for the subject of an article. It should be clear from the article itself how and why the subject is notable. An article with just the words "Johann Sebastian Bach made music" may be deleted, because it doesn't become clear in what way Bach became notable through music, even though we all know that Bach is definitely notable enough for Wikipedia. Btw, you can sign your messages using four ~'s, like so: ~~~~. AecisBrievenbus 23:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I have decided to remove the speedy deletion tag. I believe notability has been established sufficiently to avoid speedy deletion under criterion A7, non-notability. If another editor feels that the article still doesn't meet our policies and guidelines, or that Geoffrey Sayre-McCord is simply not notable enough for Wikipedia, he or she may still nominate the article for deletion via our regular deletion process. AecisBrievenbus 23:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: If you add ~~~~ after your message, it will show your signature. Go ahead and try it :) AecisBrievenbus 23:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Regarding the Stanford Encyclopedia articles: do they all cite one and the same publication, or do they cite several publications? Because if all the articles cite one and the same publication, I've got something in mind that could fix that and establish his notability: footnotes. AecisBrievenbus 23:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Granada Theater (Lawrence, Kansas)

message: Lawrence's Granada Theater is not on the National Register of Historic Places.  Browsing the content at:
http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreghome.do?searchtype=natreghome
and entering "Kansas, Douglas County" affirms that the Granada Theater does NOT show up in the registry.  (The search results cannot be directly linked.)
Many confuse Lawrence's Granada Theater with the Granada Theater in Kansas City, KS--approximately 30 miles to the east.  The Granada in KCK is on the NRHP.--Subwoofer (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:King / Food for Thought

message: Isn't this song about Jesus coming back to the Earth?Vorbee (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Jesus coming back to the Earth
Talk:Bill Martin (philosopher)

message: No notability has been established.  The tags on this article have been up for four years.  Credible independent secondary sources are required. --Xcuref1endx (talk) 00:29, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability has been established per the subject meeting WP:AUTHOR. See the recent Afd discussion for details. Also, I have removed tags from the article that are no longer applicable. NorthAmerica1000 17:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The new sources found on this subject only provide information to titles of his books.  The actual substance of the article is dependent on two sources.  One of which is a questionable source.  The tags should go back up.  --Xcuref1endx (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

text: Further, it just seems like this article is about the subjects relationship with Bob Avakian and the RCP.  And not really about the subject himself.  --Xcuref1endx (talk) 19:08, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Fiat 519

message: I moved this from Fiat 519S because the article covers several different variations of the 519 model. Worth noting is that a previous edit changed the total number produced from 7452 to 2411. It may be that the latter number was specifically referring to the 519S. Unfortunately, I don't know enough to sort out what refers to a variant and what applies to the overall model generally. --Michael Snow 20:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Province of Monza and Brianza

message: Now there are officially 50 communes in the province of Monza and Brianza! Busnago, Caponago, Cornate d'Adda, Lentate sul Seveso and Roncello are in the province of Milan in this moment...this is an officially news!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.61.238.162 (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: There are 50 communes

message: There are 55 communies in the "Province of Monza and Brianza"! Shut up and go cry to mummy! Check your information provider or change your pusher.
Fonts: me, the world boss --87.2.50.129 (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Simijaca

message: This means you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to shut down WP Geographic Coordinates & ban coordinates on wikipedia articles

message: I believe we need most of the content translated to english. GoodDay (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  English translation
Talk:Wreckx-n-Effect

message: W-N-E thought A Tribe Called Quest dissed them in "We Got (The Jazz)" and fucked up his face - hence the masks in the videos for "Electric Relaxation" and "Hot Sex". Does anyone know more about this, and could they write it up? Es-won 23:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Q-Tip Beatdown
Talk:List of voice types

message: Anchoress 23:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does the article [[Opera singers]] redirect here?

message: This "article" had been proposed for deletion in December 2008; that proposal ended with a speedy deletion, but it seems to have survived due to the article's frequent renaming. It should indeed be deleted. The article contains nothing more than a trivial list and is uncategorised and orphaned; the two REDIRECTs List of opera singers by voice type and List of opera singers (both orphans themselves) need to find better targets or should also be deleted. Michael Bednarek (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this article exist?
Talk:Kenaston, Saskatchewan

message: SriMesh | talk 23:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

message: It's great to see a Chilly Gonzales reference in this article, but the Solo Piano II track is named after the street where he spent his childhood years in Montreal. Here is his Twitter reply indicating such.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.42.217.69 (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solo Piano II 
Talk:Bogotá Capital District

message: What's the difference between the two? Are they the same? I cannot tell by reading the two articles, although there are a lot of repetition between them. If they are the same (like Washington D.C. and District of Columbia), perhaps they should be merged? Chanheigeorge (talk) 04:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Bogotá]] and [[Bogotá Capital District]]
Talk:The Schoolgirl's Diary

message: According to CNN, the name of this movie is "The Schoolgirl's Diary" (http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/01/09/north.korea.film.ap/index.html). Is this a different film or is that page titled incorrectly? 118.100.138.18 (talk) 10:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article renamed. Apokrif (talk) 21:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pierre Guité

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Stephane Charbonneau - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:21, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion has closed.  Page was moved to recognize the accent on his last name.  PKT(alk) 16:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Fuck You (Dr. Dre song)

message: Currently fails WP:NSONG (insufficient sourced information). I will redirect this in a few days. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?
Talk:Vixens (manga)

message: Um. I really think the link to this page should go to a disambiguation; searching [the plural for female foxes] shouldn't lead to the porn article instead of the netball article or the article on foxes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.56.1.106 (talk) 22:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

message: From WP:PROD: PROD is one-shot only: It must not be used for pages PRODed before or previously discussed at AfD or FfD.
The article was de-prodded back in 2011 - so doesn't that mean the PROD is now invalid? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vixens&diff=415729433&oldid=415728950
Found archived Mania review of the OVA: https://web.archive.org/web/20110307114911/http://www.mania.com/vixens_article_75649.html
The other review of this is "Visionary", pg 733, The anime encyclopedia: a guide to Japanese animation since 1917, McCarthy & Clement 2007 - which would make it pass WP:BK #1 - the issue is getting the actual book to read the review. Extremepro (talk) 13:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical De-PROD
Talk:Tropical rainforest conservation

message: Not a very good article at present. Lots of opinion, value judgemenst and erroneous statements. Needs a mjor re-write to make it impartial and include vital information such as WHY rainforest is cleared.Ethel Aardvark 00:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a rather poor article, and needs a good cleaning.
True, also it could do with some reasons FOR conservation, i.e. preserving biodiversity, natural beauty  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.183.32 (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating
Talk:Landmark Worldwide/Archive 8

message: There are two things: 
1. There is a POV statement that the courts have "sometimes sided" with Landmark.  That is a misleading statement - in NO case have the courts gone against Landmark with regard to the cult stuff.  It is one of the reasons many editors consider this to be non-notable.  Therefore I think this whole section needs to be radically reduced but as a stop gap at least acknowledging that the courts have never ruled AGAINST Landmark will hold that space. 
2.  The DOL has not ruled on anything.  You can check court records and the DOL website.  It is an investigator, an employee, that made whatever conclusions they made and then took no further action and no legal proceedings resulted. This is just a fix of an obvious misdirection in the text (intentional or otherwise).
These are I think the minorest changes to make this slightly less skewed. Please let me know if there is any question about this.  Thanks! Alex Jackl 01:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV rationale for minor changes to the Labor stuff 

message: "Landmark Education sued for correction and, on May 14, 1997, the Berlin court (Volksgericht 27A)..."
the last "volksgericht" in germany existed in the 1920's in bavaria. i suggest the author should verify their source. believe me, there is no such court in berlin. i'm sorry i can't correct it, since i could not even find any other court decision concerning landmark in berlin in 1997.
87.162.75.156 00:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  situation in germany
Talk:Preconditioned conjugate gradient method

message: They're mostly duplicate - seems no need for separate page for the PCG method.
Anyone? Bueller? Thr PCG page is redundant since both methods are described (and better) by [conjugate gradient] and [preconditioner].
I would prefer to merge this page with "conjugate gradient method".
: Absolutely.  This is conjugate gradient method.  Not a preconditioner.  Let's keep like things together, instead of merging unlike by related things together.  128.114.60.100 01:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Will change this page into a #REDIRECT once finish checking if there is still something worth moving into Conjugate gradient method.—Kxx (talk) 16:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done.—Kxx (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 72

message: Sign up here. Tony 02:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, this person is advocating British spelling for American-related articles? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calling for a movement to eliminate American spelling on Wikipedia
Talk:All Blacks XV

message: 2023 squad announced today. 49.185.200.83 (talk) 08:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  update due
Talk:Perdido Key State Park

message: Barrier islands protect the Florida mainland from the harsh effects of storms and provide habitats for shorebirds and other coastal animals. Perdido Key is a 247-acre barrier island near Pensacola on the Gulf of Mexico. White sand beaches and rolling dunes covered with sea oats make this park a favorite destination for swimmers and sunbathers. Surf fishing is another popular activity. Boardwalks from the parking lot allow visitors to access the beach without causing damage to the fragile dunes and beach vegetation. Covered picnic tables overlooking the beach provide a great place for family outings. Located 15 miles southwest of Pensacola, off State Road 292.
Contact the Florida Park Service Information Center for general inquiries.
For Information about Perdido Key State Park, please call 850-492-1595.
Hours of Operation
8:00 AM to sunset
Driving Directions
Perdido Key State Park is located 15 miles southwest of Pensacola, off S.R. 292.
Go to the Google Map of this Park
Park Fees
Admission Fee - Honor $2.00 per vehicle
<ref>Florida State Parks</ref/>[Florida State parks]
Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perdido Key State Park
Talk:Dodd-Hinsdale House

message: In my cleanup of this article, I removed the text which suggested that the house has Eastlake features (because it doesn't have them). Websites such as this one: Raleigh Historic Districts Commission incorrectly decribe the porch as Eastlake. The porch of the Dodd-Hinsdale House is Italianate like many other features. Very similar porches can be seen on Italianate houses as during and before the 1850s, long before Charles Eastlake published his popular book in America.
In otherwords, this is simply a warning to avoid any accidental addition of this peice of (mis)information into the article in the future.
--A.Fox 17:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eastlake porch (or lack thereof)
Talk:National Amateur Body-Builders' Association

message: The Magazine and League mentioned in this topic is erroneous. 'Health & Strength' is the magazine from the American AAU (Bob Hoffman of York Barbell Club). The earlier 'Strength & Health' is the British publication and name of the League. Daisne (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength & Health (League)