Talk:Misclassification of employees as independent contractors

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://constructioncitizen.com/
*:Triggered by \bconstructioncitizen\.com\b on the local blacklist
*http://constructioncitizen.com/search/node/misclassification
*:Triggered by \bconstructioncitizen\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Substituted at 00:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Misclassification of employees as independent contractors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926075233/http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0%2C%2Cid%3D150358%2C00.html to http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0%2C%2Cid%3D150358%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Misclassification of employees as independent contractors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716032022/http://www.dol.gov/whd/workers/Misclassification/AI-2015_1.pdf to http://www.dol.gov/whd/workers/Misclassification/AI-2015_1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: This article treats the topic as an entirely American phenomenon. Please edit the article to include non-US perspectives on misclassification of employees as independent contractors. - Swiss Mister in NY (talk) 15:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is biased to US law and perspective