lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Camberwick Green

message: Hello! I spotted a slight error- the date that the Life On Mars trailer aired was January 2007, rather than January 2006.
The voice on the Life on Mars trailer sounded like Simon Pegg to me...
Episode aired - March 20th 2007, can't verify voice over.Zelphi 10:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Camberwick Green'' and ''Life on Mars''

message: BBC digitally restores 1960s children's trilogy after animation creator Gordon Murray digs out original film in atticBBC digitally restores 1960s children's trilogy after animation creator Gordon Murray digs out original film in attic
http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/video/2012/jan/13/trumpton-before-after-restoration-video  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.22.169.142 (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost originals Found 

message: One of the vicars in The Great Sermon Handicap is called Cuthbert Gribble. It doesn't look like anyone has spotted this in any obvious sources, so I'll just see if anyone can do better. Tigerboy1966  18:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  P G Wodehouse reference
Talk:Philibert Commerson

message: I wonder why the name is spelled Commerçon, while the French Wikipedia and almost all other sources that I can find spell it Commerson. The French Wikipedia also lists a number of books about him, all in that spelling. Can anybody give a source why the spelling with -ç- is used here? Thanks Stephan Matthiesen (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Most sources spell his name with an s; I now adopted this in the article. Have Tylototriton (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the name 

message: The article says "It was not until the expedition reached Tahiti that Commerçon's servant on the voyage, Jeanne Baré, was discovered to be a woman. In spite of Commerçon's apparent lack of perceptiveness concerning Baré..."
This is doubtful. The Jeanne Baré article says "She had been Commerçon's co-worker, housekeeper and lover before the trip." This is doubtless from Ridley's book, referenced elsewhere in that article. Comerçon very likely knew pretty well that she was, in fact, a woman. HughGRex (talk) 14:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baré 
Talk:Frank Tieri (mobster)

message: Hello,
   Thought that you needed to know that my grandfather, Frank Tieri, died on March, 29th 1981, not on March 31st and that although he was convicted on the Rico stature, he was sentenced to houuse arrest and was never expected to go to jail.  He also postumously won the appeal that was filed for him, so technically, ne was never a convicted gangster. I'm sure of all these facts because I lived in the same house as him in Brooklyn.  My mother Nettie Tieri Villani was his daughter and she died on March 22, 1978, exactly a week and three years to the day before her father.  That's just something a daughter doesn't forget and I also attended his trial every day so trust that my facts are correct.         Thanks,
                 Diomira Villani Accurso 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.86.80 (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Date of birth now shows as March 29, 1981. The article does not mention a successful posthumous appeal but there would need to be a verifiable source for that. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sheridan Morley

message: An obit I've just read says he was "a cousin of Joanna Lumley".  Her parents were named James Lumley and Beatrice Weir.  Robert Morley married a Joan Buckmaster, a daughter of Gladys Cooper.  So, unless Weir and Buckmaster were sisters (possible, but that would suggest Buckmaster had married and been widowed/divorced before marrying Morley), Sheridan Morley and Joanna Lumley could not have been first cousins.  Maybe they were second cousins or something.  Anyone have any info?  --  JackofOz (talk) 21:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cousin of Joanna Lumley?
Talk:Chestnut teal

message: Why does this article say that the chestnut teal is protected when it is least concern? --RoryReloaded (talk) 07:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it is not endangered, and numbers appear stable, it only occurs in S Australia, so unrestricted hunting could rapidly cause a decline in the numbers of this endemic species. "Protected" doesn't necessarily equate to "endangered". Actually, in most countries all but a few pest species receive some degree of protection, and even quarry species have restrictions on when they can be hunted Jimfbleak (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection status

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Male chestnut teal.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 18, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-11-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 22:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Male chestnut teal.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Female Chestnut Teal duck.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 28, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-04-28. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Female Chestnut Teal duck.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Théodore Monod

message: Should the page be moved to Théodore André Monod, thus leaving room to have a separate page for his father Théodore Monod (1836 - 1921), the French protestant minister and hymn writer? DFH (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See Lyrics by Theodore Monod on NetHymns. DFH (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move?
Talk:Collared sparrowhawk

message: Many other bird pages have this section, and this particular bird needs it desperately. Australian bird guide books (eg Simpson and Day) recognize the very close similarity in appearance between this bird and the Brown Goshawk, with the main difference between them being mainly that this bird is much smaller. That factoid should go into this section.
121.217.134.179 (talk) 11:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please feel free to add such (appropriately referenced) material. Maias (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification section needed
Talk:Eastern whipbird

message: Seen more often than heard, it is a dark olive-green and black in colour with a distinctive white cheek patch and crest.
The Eastern Whipbird is generally shy, and is heard much more often than seen. Its long drawn out call
------
Clive Robertson mentioned this in an interview, it struck me as an interesting thing that's also valid for an encyclopedia if only a good reference could be found.  Sorry for not being the guy to actually do the work...
"For example, to my left is a whip bird. It's a male whip bird. It goes "whit". The females go "whit whit", and if she doesn't do it quickly, the male bird does it instead of her, but they have fights sometimes because he does it very quickly and she says "wait for me, wait for me"."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.181.41 (talk) 11:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Créteil International Women's Film Festival

message: "Créteil, Paris, France" and "Located southeast of the center of the city of Paris" - Listen. It's Creteil, France. Located southeast of Paris. Which is another city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:159:3CE0:1866:E29F:4285:F89D (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not Paris!
Talk:Government of the classical Ottoman Empire

message: This article presents the Ottoman state organization as almost totally static, without mention of the many developments and transformations it experienced over the centuries. It hardly distinguishes between how the Ottoman Empire was organized in 1450, 1600, 1700, 1800, and so on, mixing eras together at will. It provides an unrealistic and ahistorical depiction of the Ottoman Empire as a static state which did not change over time. There was no single "State Organization of the Ottoman Empire" just as there was no single "State Organization of France" that one can speak of spanning multiple centuries. This article is thus extremely problematic. It needs to be updated to reflect the changes the empire experienced over the centuries, with these changes placed into their proper historical context. Chamboz (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: (186.188.238.66 (talk) 06:48, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sense of historical change 

message: The Servet i Funun here https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129259/100/PFSIF9190925A340.jpg stated that Retik Halid Bey was the director of posts and telegraphs. https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129259/97/PFSIF9190925A337%20%281919-09-25%29.jpg identifies it as Issue #1428
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director of posts and telegraphs
Talk:Visa policy of the Schengen Area

message: Regarding the entry requirements for Annex II nationals, I have deleted the requirement to 'have a machine-readable passport with digital photo or a biometric passport'. I cannot find any reference to this in Article 6 of the Schengen Borders Code, nor in the Practical Handbook for Border Guards in Part II, Section I, Point 3.1. Article 6(1)(a) simply states that a third-country national has to possess a 'valid travel document' that was issued no more than 10 years ago and is valid for at least 3 months beyond the intended date of departure. If, however, I have missed the reference to this requirement, please feel free to reverse my edit. Thanks. Bonus bon (talk) 09:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Travel document requirement 

message: Since Croatia was added to the Schengen area, the maps need to be updated. Any information in the article which categorises Croatia with BG, RO, or CY should be edited appropriately. Also, the Euler diagram should be altered. 31.208.29.4 (talk) 02:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think everything is updated now. Feel free to correct any instances that may have been missed. Heitordp (talk) 06:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Croatia's accession to Schengen 

message: I put the older proposals for visa exemptions in a collapsed box because they don't seem to be under consideration anymore. If you don't want the box, I think that it's better to remove them from the article altogether. Heitordp (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not true- the EU is still exploring options for visa facilitation with some of those countries (like Armenia/ see ). Archives908 (talk) 21:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So the countries that are still under consideration should be updated with a more recent source and year, but I think that the others should be removed. Heitordp (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But as long as the Commission has not retracted its proposal, there is still a proposal, however old it is. --Nablicus (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly- there isn't deadlines for these... If a proposal has been officially withdrawn, then that country/countries could be moved to a "Former" sub-section. Otherwise, they are all still technically valid unless WP:RS confirms otherwise. Archives908 (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposals for visa exemptions before 2019
Talk:Siméon Bourgois

message: Why is the name of our Admiral spelled Bourgeois when all the French references give it as Bourgois?  This needs an overhaul by the person who posted it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferreiro (talk • contribs) 14:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the name spelled Bourgeois when all the French references give it as Bourgois?
Talk:Jean Jacques Étienne Lucas

message: The article states that Lucas was awarded the gold cross of the Légion d'honneur by Napoleon. This seems to be a direct translation from the French WIkipedia article on Lucas referring to him being awarded "la croix d'or de la Légion d'honneur". However, I have been unable to find any reference in either the English or French Wikipedias, and other reference sources, to such an award. Should this be Grand Cross/Grand-Croix? Emeraude (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold cross/Croix d'or
Talk:Aristide Aubert du Petit-Thouars

message: This article mention that Aristide Aubert Du Petit Thouars lost both legs and one arm while the french sources I've seen (including the french version of the article) mention both arms and one leg.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by StephaneOdul (talk • contribs) 22:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:French ship Vengeur du Peuple

message: The previous name of this ship, Marseillais (or Marseillois) is a reference to the city of Marseilles, and not to the Revolutionary song of that name which post-dates the ship by quite some time. Xyl 54 (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I've deleted the citation request for the number saved ('about 400') as it's in Mahan, the source for that part of the article; I've added the page number (finally!). It means there's a discrepancy now with the other figure given (277); that's also unreferenced, so I've added a citation request for it. Xyl 54 (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I only just addressed issues pointed out in the previous nomination. I would be grateful for any advise, and also for suggestions to improve the language and flow of the article. Rama (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers
Talk:Panic Attack (robot)

message: Most of the videos seem to be offline (at least when trying to view from germany). -- 92.225.2.96 (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videos 

message: The tone is best described as "poor". "Nail that is tough"? Seriously, did anyone enter a robot that was a nail? I have a good(ish) memory and I don't recall a nail being entered. Tough as Nails, yes. A general nail used by a hammer, no. I removed "Nail that is tough". If there are other cases of bad tone, I'm off to Specsavers... only joking.--The Master of Mayhem ROAD AHEAD CLOSED 19:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:New Siberian Islands

message: My world atlas shows 2 distinct groups of Novosibirskiye Ostrova (New Siberian Islands) - the group described here, and another group midway between these and Novoya Zemla. Are they be called East and West, or should they all be grouped together in this article? Bards 21:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now resolved. Although my atlas shows the name "Novosibirskiye Ostrova" for both groups of islands, Wikipedia has already classified the western group as Severnaya Zemlya. I have therefore used that name for the category aswell. Bards 22:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 distinct groups of islands 

message: There is no permanent population on these islands, since they are a part of a nature reserve.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 5, 2013; 13:17 (UTC)
:In September 2014, the Russian Navy reestablished a Soviet base which had laid abandoned since 1993.[5]24.156.78.205 (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is a naval base there, there has to be some population, however small.24.156.78.205 (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Population??
Talk:Scroby Sands Wind Farm

message: Broken Link on this page 62.253.114.147 21:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: Here is a photoset on Flickr of the Scroby Sands wind farm:
* http://www.flickr.com/photos/mdpettitt/sets/72157608452659266/
The photos appear to have the appropriate licenses to make them acceptable for uploading to Commons. --Teratornis (talk) 09:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photoset on Flickr 
Talk:Fletching

message: I don't think that information about fletching as a skill in some MMORPG is relevant. It is probably used in a lot of other RPGs and fantasy books, besides RuneScape doesn't even link here. --91.84.42.237 17:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular culture 

message: The reason why I removed the "Urban" definition is because it's Felch...not Fletch that the definition was alluding to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.143 (talk) 17:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Urban" definition 

message: Where is the information about the actual construction of arrows? I only see the information on arrow feathers here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.1.203 (talk) 05:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrowsmithing

message: Is the bit about tampons necessary? It seems to be a bit of a tangent, sourced or not.124.170.94.188 (talk) 12:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tampons

message: I came here because I was reading an article which casually mentioned, "...pagan Mongol steppe warriors who had lacquered, reticulated short bows that they could fire from horseback and which could penetrate armor. (Mongols had very sophisticated fletchers)."  I'd love to see more information about Mongol fletchers here.  There also seems to be some wiki content already on Japanese arrow types; perhaps some of that could be incorporated to make a better overall summary article. C. Scott Ananian (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongol and Japanese fletchers
Talk:Hendersonville High School (Tennessee)

message: This article needs more content to meet Wikipedia's standards.
Jordan Thomas 21:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Complex homeopathy

message: I am involved in a cleaning up process of the article Classical homeopathy but it is a lot of work, I could use help from others, if someone wants to help just go there, and I am also active on the Talks page with the user "Debbe" (a wiki-pedia friend of mine who helps there) so thank you in advance for your help with fixing that page Pernambuco 21:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Classical homeopathy]]
Talk:Veterinary homeopathy

message: I am involved in a cleaning up process of the article Classical homeopathy but it is a lot of work, I could use help from others, if someone wants to help just go there, and I am also active on the Talks page with the user "Debbe" (a wiki-pedia friend of mine who helps there) so thank you in advance for your help with fixing that page Pernambuco 21:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: request from editors of [[Classical homeopathy]]
Talk:Blackburn Shark

message: A italian Torpedo Ship "Clio" claim a Shark II the 21st december 1940, they recovered some pieces from the sea, the Shark had attacked a cargo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.10.209.168 (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, it was probably a mis-identified Swordfish that was claimed.Combat use of the Shark seems to have been restricted to some very limited use over Malaya.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in WW 2
Talk:Codex Marianus

message: The article on Serbian Wikipedia claims that this is "the oldest Serbian book" and that Jagić inferred that "the scribe was in fact a Serb". The article on Bulgarian Wikipedia claims that phonological characteristic of the language indicate "a later stage of the Bulgarian language", and that by mixing of /ǫ/ and /u/ (which also merged in Serbo-Croatian BTW) it is "believed that the codex originates from northern Macedonia".
I think that this explains a bit some of the problematic recent edits - this manuscript is appropriated by several nations of as a part of their cultural heritage. I urge everyone to keep NPOV in mind. Modern nation-states have absolutely nothing to do with 11th-century manuscripts, and statements such as "Bulgarian, i.e. Macedonian" reek of Pan-Bulgarianism. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do other pedias say on this
Template talk:User you and me

message: What is the intended message behind this userbox?  Is the intent...
*(A) ...to support the usage of "You and Me" as the subject of a sentence despite being improper usage?
*(B) ...to speak out against the usage of "You and Me" as the subject of a sentence because it is grammatically incorrect?
If (A) is the intended message, then perhaps the message should be clarified in some way that this editor cannot currently imagine.
If (B) is the intended message, then the word "incorrect" in the userbox display text should be changed to "correct."
Blueminneapolis 21:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to read it more carefully. The intent is to speak out against people who try to avoid "you and me" at all cost, even when it is used as the object of a sentence. For example, most people understand that saying, "you and me should get together sometime," is incorrect, and it is, because "me" should not be used as the subject of a sentence. However, many people extend this to the incorrect notion that "you and me" is always incorrect, even when used as the object of a sentence. For example, "He bought a gift for you and me" is correct, because "you and me" is the object of that sentence. Many people, however, are tempted to avoid "you and me" and say, "he bought a gift for you and I", which is incorrect. It seems that the tongue-in-cheek ending to this, with the deliberately incorrect "you and me need to have a little talk", may be confusing you, but the 100 or so users who have linked to this don't seem to be confused. I think it is fine as it is.-Jefu 02:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'd prefer it the other way, but it's what there is. I may make my own version, though... SamBC 23:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm with Sambc and Bluemin. here.  I get the "self-referential error" style of humour in userboxes, but this one is referring to the wrong error.  If this userbox changes, or if a rival userbox springs up, please let me know, and I'll use it. --Slashme 11:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intended Message