Talk:Mukden incident

message: If anyone can add text/bibliography concerning the Soviet involvement in this incident I'd be very grateful!
: Soviet Russia and its division of Communist Party of China (CPC) tried to create Soviet region in Manchuria by planed riot of December 11, 1930. But in November 9, Japanese police copped them and got many their documents. After 1932, Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs started to publish the book of "The history of Communist Party of China". Here is the book of 1934 version: http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=Jtlw6SdJGUUC&pg=frontcover . the book says the general meeting of CPC central executive committee did not open for 3 years after January 1931. some primary sources are on Japanese Wikipedia but I don't know any good English resources or even Japanese resources. :/ --182.168.50.171 (talk) 23:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the Russians doing? 

message: In the West historical events are usually referred to by their content, places, or people involved -- events of a military nature are almost always described by their location. Using dates is uncommon (9/11 being the main exception I can think of). Brutannica 01:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be renamed as [[918 Incident]]

message: It would be helpful if someone knowledgable could cite the evidence of 'major hanaya', with an online or offline source or whatever other evidence either way is existent
: So pleased to see your comment asking for verifyable sources, of which there are little to none regarding this incident. It is pure specualtion and gossip.2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:1C7E:AAB:4F08:6643 (talk) 08:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Could someone add a section on actions of the League of Nations during the crisis? From my own knowledge, I know they dispached a team of investigators who took a long time to issue a moral condemnation. Can someone verify this as I am not certain this is true. Poorsod 15:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  League of Nations 

message: No one has the spare time to do this? its obviously needed. --Utmostevil 18:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Of course it should be merged with Manchuria Incident

message: I made the following changes based on Edward Behr's book "The Last Emperor":
In "The Incident", changed statement placing the bomb "beneath the tracks".. Behr's book says it was placed nearby so as not to do any damage - the photo bears this out.  Accordingly, changed "destroyed track" to "damaged track".  Also, a citation is needed regarding Itagaki Seishiro as one of the planners, Behr's book does not mention him at all.
In "Invasion", I reworded statement that the Chinese were "immediately framed"... poor usage.  I think what is meant is they were "blamed".  Also deleted "put up no resistance".  500 dead Chinese soldiers seems to indicate there was some resistance, at least at first.  P. Moore 02:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 07Apr07 Edit

message: The peace museum in Hiroshima says the Japanese blew it up.
--220.233.190.68 15:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just by the by 

message: removed:
:"However, some Japanese Nationalists and those on the Japanese far-right, allege a variety of dissenting opinions, ranging from an inability to know accurately who planted the bomb, to accusations of Chinese militia members planting it."
unreferenced since February. User:Pedant 10:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed 

message: It stikes me that including the reference to Holocaust denial in the Contoversy section is editorializing:
"However, just like the Holocaust denial, the nationalistic Japanese establishment, such as the Yushukan Museum, which neighbors the Yasukuni Shrine in Japan, places the blame on Chinese militias."
Any sources analyzing supposed parallels? Bigbadger79 15:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  just like the Holocaust denial? 

message: Someone should do a GA-nom...I'm in "study for finals" mode right now.--Xiaphias (talk) 10:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice article.

message: Are there any historical records indicating what time in the morning of September 13, 1931, the Japanese troops attacked the Chinese garrison of 7,000 soldiers?   Did this happen before dawn?  Was there fog or rain at the time?   What kind of weather reports were available to the Chinese and Japanese military, respectively?    198.177.27.32 (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The morning of September 13, 1931 

message: I apologize if I'm not doing this right (and I don't think I am, even though I searched the help files looking for instructions)--Just a tiny point on the Mandarin pinyinization of the incident which is currently written as "liu3 tiao2 gou1": why is the last character pinyinized as "gou1" the related character appears to be "hu2" and as far as I know, it only has one reading (hu2), shouldn't this be corrected?  Didn't want to go and do it myself unless I'm mistaken. Weiming2 (talk) 14:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pinyin Error Right at the Beginning of the Article?

message: The WP article: False flag uses this as an example of a false flag operation.  There should probably be some cross-pollination (mention this as a false flag operation somewhere?) ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  False flag 

message: The  is the Japanese name for what English Wikipedia calls the "Japanese invasion of Manchuria". The ja.wiki link included on this page more correctly belongs on that article, and the two should probably be merged. I'm not a specialist in this area, so if someone could cite a source that actually says "The Manchurian Incident was a staged event engineered by rogue Japanese military personnel as a pretext for the Japanese invasion in 1931 of northeastern China, known as Manchuria." I'd be willing to change my position. But I've checked two other encyclopedia articles with this title and both of them agree that what is being described is the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. This is of concern because I was recently under a provisional unblock preventing me from directly editing the History of Japan page, and I requested another user make an edit in my stead; that edit was, according to normal usage of the term "Manchurian Incident", perfectly acceptable; but this article appears to contradict it. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article's lead is OR 

message: I added the location. This is an original map.
Manchurian Incident Map
which matches the location of the museum. My coordinates may be out by 100m or so. Macgroover (talk) 16:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: In the "In popular culture" section, it says:
:The violent manga Gantz has a reference when an elder says that an occurrence reminds him of the "Manchurian Incident".
Where in the manga is the Mukden Incident mentioned? I haven't read the manga and I can't find where it is referenced. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 12:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference to the Mukden Incident in Gantz 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Marco Polo Bridge Incident which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 00:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress