Talk:Bobby Darling

message: If the actor had done so many movies ... for heavens sake don't delete the article again.. Just because you don't like the actor doesn't mean that he is any less important.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.105.145 (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  thank God the article is back 

message: If he were American, now way his article would have been deleted... Wikipedia is dominated by western world and they keep deleting Indian articles... How could they know about such people... Even Baba Sehgal's article was deleted so many times...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.222.205 (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  seriously man 

message: C'mon people, don't be ridiculous. Rather than using the topic in question as a pretext for flaming Westerners, give a moment's thought to why the article was deleted in the first place, and you'll find the reason obvious.
This is not an article. This is an abomination.
It is an almost incoherent, tabloid-like account of abysmal quality masquerading as an information page which, I must say, closely resembles the gushings of a not-so-bright admirer.
If people do feel so strongly about Wikipedia featuring information on this particular individual, I invite anybody with even a little amount of knowledge on the subject to go ahead and perform a complete rewrite. Produce a stub, but by Thunder, blast this insulting piece of pseudo-information off anywhere it can see the light of day.
--Tshloab (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introspection Is The Answer 

message: I couldn't bear to see a page in such squalid condition on the hallowed grounds of Wikipedia. Therefore, I took it upon myself to carry out essentially what can be considered a deep cleansing. 
As I haven't an iota of knowledge on the subject, all I could do was try to decipher what was splattered here earlier, and translate it from pidgin to a more widely accessible dialect.
So, while this and  countless other such articles still leave a lot to be desired, I can, knowing that I've done all that I could've done for the situation, breathe easy. For now, at least.
--Tshloab (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answering Mine Own Call 

message: Acting career section obviously paraphrased from this site, so removed.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright review. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bobby Darling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081029034510/http://us.indiantelevision.com/interviews/y2k4/actor/bobby_darling.htm to http://us.indiantelevision.com/interviews/y2k4/actor/bobby_darling.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022032715/http://www.indiannewslink.co.nz/index.php/archives/feb152010/radiotarana/4108.html to http://www.indiannewslink.co.nz/index.php/archives/feb152010/radiotarana/4108.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022025426/http://archive.deccanherald.com/Content/Apr222009/metro-wed20090421131578.asp to http://archive.deccanherald.com/Content/Apr222009/metro-wed20090421131578.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified