lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Expiration date (disambiguation)

message: This article merely redirects to "shelf life." It would be useful to have a treatment of the meaning of "expiration date", hopefully one that points out that the difference between the last day that something is valid or useful, and the first day that something is no lonber valid or useful. The term is often taken to mean either of these dates, which of course are not the same.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.231.139 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 29 January 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:List of Danish painters

message: Pardon my ignorance, but would someone with more experience in such matters please tell me if this page should exist?  Shouldn't [Category:Danish painters] be sufficient? Ccady (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally, the list should be annotated with information such as styles. In that case, the list and the category would complement each other quite nicely in my opinion. Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates has a couple of relevant points. Hemmingsen 19:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category: Danish painters
Talk:Inter-faithism

message: I have changed this from a minimal disambiguation (with Multiculturalism) to a straight redirect(ion) page. 
The choice and the destination Religious pluralism was not done lightly; I considered dropping the redirect to Religious_pluralism#Inter-religious_pluralism_.28between_different_religions.29 but chose the general case. 
This was a personal ¨10 randon pages¨ project fluke, but I have practical experience in this field. Peter Ellis 21:25, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ignacy Daszyński

message: I'm sorry okay I found this information on www.google.com and I posted it. Trying to help Wikipedia. But for some reason you people deleted it. What is it everything I contribute to you delete it? It's not fare.
--Relaxation 21:42, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haunebu

message: Its photoshopping couldn't possibly be more obvious. Please tell me if it's NOT an inverted soup bowl, with "Haunebu" written on its side by a 6-year-old with a blue marker! Shadow86 21:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove the first picture! 

message: I agree that this article must be handled with care, as none of its major contentions are readily provable.  That being said, the subject is of interest because it has entered into pop culture.  I have inserted some text into the first paragraph of the section titled "The Series Prototype" in order to make it clear that the statements are not proven facts.  Perhaps others could edit the rest of the article with these additions in mind:  "It is claimed," "it is said," "legend hold," according to the legend," "allegedly," "purportedly," "supposedly," etc.  These additions will assist in giving the article and Wiki more credibility. --Mylitta 06:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making this article less fictional 

message: This article alone justifies the Random Article button. Yeah, maybe it's all nonsense, but it's fantastic in both senses of the word - if it does get removed, I hope it will be retained somewhere in WP. Adambrowne666 11:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (‽) 

message: I feel a little uneasy about this picture. It could be fake, but if it's a fake, it's a pretty good one. All the same if it's a fake or not I'm not shure if it can be regarded open content. And if it isn't I wonder wether we could make fair use of it and show it. By the way: the lady in the back of the car is sayd to be sigrun. I like Burke's Peerage 14:35, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What about this picture ...?
Talk:Boléro

message: In the overview of the article, it is stated that Bolero is "Ravel's most famous musical composition". However, this is up for debate. First, works that are considered popular are subject to one's personal opinion. Furthermore, there are other works by Ravel that could be considered as more or equally popular, including Pavane for a Dead Princess, Daphnis et Chloe, Le Tombeau de Couperin, Gaspard de la Nuit, and others. Although it appears that the general consensus is that Bolero is the most widely known, I think this sentence should be removed.
Hazard Gamer (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence quotes a reputable source. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bolero: Ravel's Most Popular Composition? 

message: THere are anecdotal remarks that this is the best piece of music to have playing whilst one has sex. 2001:8003:E490:7D01:9C87:C68:B633:4AD2 (talk) 11:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bolero and sex? 

message: I love this composition so much! However, when I listened to the rhythm sample of snare drum, it seems that the last note is cut off. Can anyone update this please? Section "Music", subsection "Structure", audio file for the snare drum.
2A00:1858:1047:9BEF:3966:8803:750E:17C3 (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last note of snare drum is not audible
Talk:Film... (TV programme)

message: The apparent rumours that Mark Kermode will take over FIlm 2010 are still just that. He was interviewed on Front Row recently and denied that he'd been approached for the role, so I'm removing the claim that he's the front runner. Marthiemoo (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark Kermode

message: Just been looking at the archives of TV-Ark and came across a promo recorded from 2 August, 1982 showing Glyn Worsnip as the presenter for the new look Film 82, which was shown at 10.40pm on 3 August, 1982. Just thought it would be of interest to mention this, just incase you want to add more presenters of the 'Film' programme to the main page. onshore
Yup, my memory is that it was not just Ian Johnstone (who was very good) who got to try out on Film 82. If I am not greatly mistaken, I remember Tina Brown (of Tatler and Vanity Fair fame) doing a couple of shows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldgreen (talk • contribs) 03:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film 82 

message: I had never even heard of a programme on television called "The Film Programme"  - I typed "The Film Programme" in here, hoping to get to the Radio Four programme. This does have a tag at the top saying that this television programme is not to be confused with the Radio Four programme  - perhaps we need a separate article on the latter. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we need  a separate article?

message: The In Crowd is missing from the list:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsFST-7Hx-Y
Johnalexwood (talk) 08:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incidental Music
Talk:Verein für Raumschiffahrt

message: Is Oberth correctly identified in the picture?
I would have assumed he is the one standing right to the rocket.
:The photo is gone, without explaination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DonPMitchell (talk • contribs) 22:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it Raumschiffahrt or Raumschifffahrt (sc. Raum+Schiff+Fahrt)?
:The new spelling is indeed Raumschifffahrt. But at that time it was Raumschiffahrt. --° 13:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses/Archive 9

message: On 28 Dec 2004 146.145.27.99 added the following link to the Main Article. As it is a self-styled "Chitchat" page it seemed, only slightly, more appropriate for the Talk page (and totally inappropriate for an encylopedic listing):
:Slippy's Jehovah's Witness Chitchat - A discussion forum for Witness and exWitness issues.
::"Where the Beer's Cold, the Women are Hot and the Discussion is Flaming!!" 
I'm not making this up, really! Discussion? Should we even bother? --DannyMuse 17:13, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chitchat Link Moved to Talk Page
Talk:Education in Austria

message: Is it me or does this article not have enough of them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.165.37 (talk) 04:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there are not enough citations. In addition I could not find a source to corroborate the private school stats. I did find a site that said 8% of schools are private schools(https://www.migration.gv.at/en/living-and-working-in-austria/children-and-education/educational-systems/) Adventurebeginsnow (talk) 16:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Geodetic airframe

message: Geodesic airships don't exist, this is merely a proposed construction method for airships of the future. The idea is worth consideration and may produce a cheap strong airframe which is easier to assemble than the "rings, ribs-and wire" type of dirigible construction seen in the early Zeppelins. No need to delete the topic. It is worthy of more talk.65.9.177.66 22:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Airships

message: * Comment I think this should have a full discussion. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: From Speedy

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose per #Requested move 2012 -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Doing some research on Barnes Wallis here. This article uses the words "geodesic" and "geodetic" interchangeably, is there any difference? Thanks 137.50.148.80 (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but WP disagrees and keeps getting it wrong.   (Geodetic is right) Andy Dingley (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The confusion has arisen from the fact that there are not many instances in English of Greek nouns in -s forming adjectives with -t-. E.g., the adjective eidetic comes from the Greek noun εἶδος (eidos). The error of using the noun geodesic as an adjective was apparently commenced or popularised by Barnes Wallis but does not need to be perpetuated in Wikipedia. The English adjective formed from the noun geodesic is geodetic. Bjenks (talk) 02:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geodesic or geodetic
Talk:Kevyn Acoin

message: The individual written about here was Kevyn Aucoin, with a "U" not Acoin. There is an already existing article about him at Kevyn Aucoin, and this article needs to be merged into that one. I will put in a request. 
Kevyn 00:19, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name is misspelled
Talk:Solicitor General for England and Wales

message: The title is "Solicitor General", and that form appears in the main text, but the list is header "Solicitors-General".  Which is the correct form?  This suggests the hyphenated version is correct, although it also suggests the unhyphenated "Attorney General" is also correct.  So much for consistency.  Wikipedia, at least, should if necessary choose one form for this article and use it and it alone.  --  JackofOz (talk) 11:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyphenated or not?
File talk:Israel and arab states map.png

message: who was china for in the arab-israeli conflict?
:China was never for anyone so much... they tend to vote with the majority of the world against Israel in the UNSC.  I'm not sure if they supplied arms... since they weren't such a big player during the major wars... since the PRC didn't even have the UNSC seat until... the 70s? I think. 22:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Based on Iran's harsh rhetoric and policy towards Israel, should it not also be greened on this map?  I am aware Arabs are not a majority ethnic group in Iran, however, this is true for many of the states included such as Somalia and Sudan.  --NEMT 23:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Iran

message: ... are not predominantly arab states, and in fact have only small minorities (<15%). For this reason I reverted to the version of the map that shows them hashed (since they do have historical ties to the arab world), which also highlights the non-Arab regions in Iraq and Sudan. Brianski 06:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the image should be renamed Israel and islamic states map or something along those lines. --NEMT 15:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This image shows Israel and the memebers of the Arab League. ←Humus sapiens ну? 20:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, but it's most often used as the image for the Arab-Israeli Conflict infobox, and the conflict's scope is beyond the arab league. --NEMT 22:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's been a protracted discussion about this in Talk:Arab-Israeli conflict (see archives). In short, if we allow Iran, we should allow the US, USSR/Russia, 57 Islamic countries, the EU, etc. so the map quickly turns into the world map. Since the Arab nations often act as a block and the Arab League is their official representative, it makes sense to show it on the map. If you have a better proposal, let's hear it. Please WP:NOR. ←Humus sapiens ну? 06:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There may not be an ideal solution, all I know is Iran has historically (and comtemporarily) had much harsher rhetoric towards Israel than countries like Bahrain, Morocco, and Mauritania and are much more involved in the ongoing conflict. --NEMT 15:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  While I may agree with this in principle, this is a slippery slope for the reasons stated above. These countries are members of the Arab League and support/promote its policies. ←Humus sapiens ну? 01:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Djibouti and Somalia

message: This David vs. Goliath propaganda map is is being abused all over Wikipedia. Even among the supporters there is no agreement on its scope or its use.RomaC (talk) 05:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? You're going to have to be a little more specific than that. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:51, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No good reason for this map 

message: I am sorry but you omitted the half of the Moroccan country. This is not a good map.
I invite you to correct it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikita-Alias (talk • contribs) 23:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morocco
Talk:Third Geneva Convention

message: I don't understand how the opinion of the Red Cross is valid in this context. Should this be separated from the legal decision and classed as an opinion?
""If civilians directly engage in hostilities, they are considered "unlawful" or "unprivileged" combatants or belligerents (the treaties of humanitarian law do not expressly contain these terms). They may be prosecuted under the domestic law of the detaining state for such action. Both lawful and unlawful combatants may be interned in wartime, may be interrogated and may be prosecuted for war crimes. Both are entitled to humane treatment in the hands of the enemy."[5]"
~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtkoan (talk • contribs) 01:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Cross on "unlawful combatants"
Talk:Zozo (film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 December 2023 

message: @Hameltion @Aviram7 I think it's fair to give this a shot, the RM was made in good faith and there isn't a huge amount of reason to assume it was controversial in the first place. https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Zozo indicates practically all identifiable outgoing traffic going to the hatnote, so even if there isn't a lot of it, there isn't much else, either. Worst case, we can check the stats later and revert (WP:BRD). --Joy (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  move
Talk:Frances Farmer

message: Did she really marry Leif Erickson Twice in 1936? Calle Widmann (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any backing for this claim. I'll edit it out. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 04:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Married to Erickson twice in the same year? 

message: How is a DVD commentary track an acceptable source to use? I've seen countless articles deny any validity of primary sources and erase them on the spot. [114] should be deleted for consistency's sake. 2600:8807:4050:7A00:B8CA:3BEB:D60C:2DFE (talk) 08:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchor Bay DVD source
Talk:List of French harpsichordists

message: Would the "listdev" template be any use here?  Ojw 01:47, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the dates shown for Jean Philippe in the graph are wrong. They should match the dates shown in the lower part of the page, 1683-1764.  thank you. Fossedestreize (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rameau dates
Talk:Avinash Kak

message: * Tidyup
** copyedit
** deboldening of the titles of books/papers etc. 
** puffery - remove peacocking words
Chaosdruid (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention needed
Talk:Mama-san

message: I'm taking out the pearl jam reference because it is utterly irrelevant. The thin premise that brings it to this article is thin by even those standards. The songs bear no relevance to this subject matter beyond their combined title, "Mamasan trilogy", simply containing the word. 
I'm assuming you're joking about "mama" being english. I'm sure you know that such words as "papa", "dada", and "mama" are independently shared by many cultures because they're the results of some of the earliest vocalisations a child makes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.73.46.236 (talk) 06:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who care about Pearl Jam 

message: When I was in the US military, we used to call elder Korean men we knew "ajossi" (invariably pronounced AH-cha-shee or AH-ta-shee). I don't know if this has any bearing on the article, but it might if it expands further. -Rolypolyman 15:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean words
Talk:Ika Omkara

message: This article should not be Merged with Aum.  Ek Onkar is distinct, although it does have a common basis in Aum, it means something different. 128.86.146.48 16:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Aum 

message: # is different than "Onkar" unlike the way this article in current form is trying to portray, please refer AGGS. 
#Furthermore, it would be wrong to say "Omkar" is a variant of  or vice versa as Omkar refers to Trinity system in which Guru Nanak (the creator of the opening verse of Japji  ) did not believe.
# has nothing to do with Sanskrit like the article is portraying currently. Guru Nanak had rejected Sanskrit and rather chosen Punjabi for his work. The second letter in  is "urra" a Punjabi letter. ---- A. S. AulakhTalk 23:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues referring to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ek_Onkar&oldid=184087825 current] version of article

message: :Ika Omkara → Ik Onkar — This page should be moved back to "Ik Onkar" as that is the overwhelmingly the most common transliteration of this Sikh tenet. Supposed inherent "-a"s are a nonfactor, every other Sikh article is titled correctly without them.--3swordz (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick google search confirms this also. I will make the move. Kingturtle (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:List of kings of Connacht

message: This page has a large number of dead links, which I suspect are rather speculative in nature.  Unless anyone has an on-going project of creating sensible stubs for this individuals, I'd propose to de-link the text. Alai 02:58, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool beans;  if it's at all active I'll of course leave it alone.  Alai 21:44, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old 2005 post

message: There is a huge problem with old Irish names, namely that there is a proliferation of spellings for the same individuals. The list of kings typifies this problem. Take the name "Aed" for example. This is really a transliteration of the old Irish which had no letter h. In modern Irish, the name would be spelled Aedh. In English, this name is Hugh. 
I propose that the list of names should be standardised according to the orthography of modern Irish. This is common practise in other countries. English monarchs are usually referred to by the modern English version of their names rather than the Danish/Old English/French/Latin forms those rulers would have used themselves. The case is similar in Germany.
Of course, individual websites of the kings in question could contain the variations of spellings to aid searching. 
What do other users and in particular the creator of this article think?--Damac 12:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardising spellings 

message: I have noticed that at the bottom of the list of O'Conor Don's you have "Desmond O'Conor Don of Sussex". I have removed the bit saying "of Sussex" because as it stands it appears to be a title. It was then put back. You ought to know that the list of "chiefs of the name" where the information for this page comes from lists all the current chiefs and states where they resided in 1999. Other people had "of Tangiers, Morocco" etc. I don't think the "of Sussex" should be retained because it is not part of the man's name and has since been erroneously duplicated elsewhere as if this is a title the person holds when in fact it is not. For all we know Prince Des O'Conor may live somewhere else now! James Frankcom 16:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "of Sussex" 

message: How could Fedlim Geancach Ó Conchobair be the king until 1475 if he died in 1474?
ICE77 (talk) 20:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fedlim Geancach Ó Conchobair: end of reign date discrepancy
Talk:Tsubasa: Those with Wings

message: According to reports -- I don't have a URL for an official announcement at the moment -- Tokyopop has licensed this under the official title Tsubasa: Those with Wings. We should move this article to that title, once we have confirmation of that. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: A place to park links to reviews until someone gets around to digesting them into the article.
* Mania vol.1
Feel free to add others or to digest any time. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews for reception
Talk:Quantitative genetics

message: I can see that Donach has put a great deal of work into this article, and I mean no disrespect by this, but at some 20,000 words (by my estimate), this article might be a twitch on the long side. The Wikipedia:Article_size suggest between 5,000 and 10,000 words in an article, and perhaps fewer for technical articles. This is because a user will probably not spend much more than an hour reading an article, and reading a technical article is likely to be slower. One solution to this problem is moving content into other articles. For some of this content, such as Pedigree Analysis, new articles will need to be created, but for others, such as Coefficient of relationship, there are existing articles. Perhaps we should look at creating some new articles, and harmonize the content in existing articles? LarryBoy79 (talk) 05:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Too long?

message: I got to this page from the "eye color" page, where it says "eye color inheritance is now recognized as a polygenic trait, meaning that it is controlled by the interactions of several genes.". This statement contradicts the one in the first paragraph of quantitative genetics that states eye color is controlled by one gene. I'm assuming one of the pages should be fixed, probably this one. 2.55.1.60 (talk) 15:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph - eye color