lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Platysma muscle

message: What are platysma's antagonists? Are there any? Does that depend on which end of the muscle is stabilized (meaning that every muscle around platysma can be one, depending on the direction of the movement)? Thank you in advance 94.244.76.220 (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your thoughts. The best person to add the content you feel is accurate is... you! Wikipedia is an open encyclopedia, which means anyone is able to edit it. Editing is quick and simple. If you have any further Anatomy-related issues, feel free to contact WP:ANATOMY. --LT910001 (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Mylohyoid muscle

message: , 
Given the current discussion on WT:MEDMOS about image galleries on anatomy articles, I feel that there are too many images on this article.
Infobox
* File:Mylohyoid muscle.PNG -- see comment on sobo 1909 255
* File:Gray1195.png -- I don't think this is adding anything. Do we need it?
Gallery (tried to keep them in order)
* File:Sobo 1909 267.png -- this is to show that mylohoid is deep to platysma. Mylohyoid is not shown in the diagram... is this diagram necessary?
* File:Sobo 1909 255.png -- this is duplicating the imformation given in File:Mylohyoid muscle.PNG . I am not sure which is better, maybe the latter since mylohoid is highlighted... but the former is a nicer picture. We should only need one.
* File:Sobo 1909 256.png -- this is a side view, but essentially does not provide any extra information to File:Mylohyoid muscle.PNG and sobo 1909 255
* File:Sobo 1909 257.png -- this is good. Consider using it in the infobox.
* File:Sobo 1909 265.png -- this essentially duplicates the information given by File:Gray177.png. Let's keep the caption of the latter and keep the former image. It is a nicer color diagram.
* File:Braus 1921 371.png -- shows the origin from the inferior. Needed?
* File:Braus 1921 360.png ⋅-- shows attachment on hyoid. Duplication of File:Gray186.png . Suggest keep the latter since it is more clear and larger.
* File:Braus 1921 367.png -- not convinced this adds anything more than sobo 1909 265 and gray177. 
* File:Gray177.png -- see comment on File:Sobo 1909 265.png.
* File:Gray186.png -- see comment on File:Braus 1921 360.png suggest keep
* File:Gray507.png -- shows arterial supply? Do we need?
* File:Gray508.png -- another showing arterial supply? Do we need?
* File:Gray778.png -- shows course of mylohoid n. We probably should keep
* File:Musculi colli mylohyoideus.svg -- this is a nice lateral view. Mylohoid is also highlighted. May as well keep imo
* File:Anterior region of neck6.JPG -- dissection... too close to be of any benefit here?
* File:Slide2e.JPG -- dissection... mylohoid is not really centered in this image. WHat does it show us for this topic?
* File:Slide1f.JPG -- ditto
* File:Slide12g.JPG -- ditto
Not sure any of those 4 dissections are suitable for this page, in this case. Thoughts? Lesion (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image gallery
Talk:Gyula Kőnig

message: I put a "unreferenced" template on the page (unlogged in --- sorry), which has been deleted.  I realize that there are some sources cited at the end; but what I meant was that none of the claims in the text is referenced, which is bad, and in particular that the quotes in the text are unreferenced, which is terrible.  (I wanted to follow up the Cantor quote for my research.)  Does anyone know where Cantor's letter has been published?  It's otherwise an excellent page, by the way.  Best wishes, Omicron18 (talk) 09:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I added a tag that more accurately reflects the cleanup needed. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing 

message: Do we know for sure that he wrote his family name as Kőnig rather than König?  The fact that he was Hungarian is insufficient proof, since this name is of German origin. McKay (talk) 08:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name 
Talk:Digastric muscle

message: There should be something on here that this muscle is a joke... because it is named "digastric" since it has 2 "bellies". So got 2 gastric cavities, hence di-gastric, or 2 bellies... Get it? So it's meant to be a joke... would be nice to include something about the etymology here 2001:8003:6A23:2C00:BC43:79FA:F9B6:D006 (talk) 12:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Most muscles are named after their appearance in latin, so this is not something that's new. In terms of etymology, it's stated in the first sentence: "The digastric muscle (also digastricus) (named digastric as it has two 'bellies')". The joke you are referring to is lost on me, but it seems to be an entertaining one :)  --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fact that this muscle is a joke...
Talk:Sternocleidomastoid muscle

message: "It also acts as an accessory muscle of inspiration, along with the scalene muscles of the neck."
HUH?  What's that mean?  What is a "muscle of inspiration" - and how is this an accessory?
--76.177.33.26 (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have a friend who is getting a surgery done relating to a abnormality in this muscle which was present at birth.  I would like to see a section on common problems, but there is none right now. Blue Rasberry 18:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with this muscle

message: Don't the sternocleidomastoid muscles pull the chin down, therefore flexing?--78.146.175.222 (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extending the head? 

message: The reference to Tom Wolfe's novel describes a man 'fan[ning] out' his neck by activating his sternocleidomastoid muscles.  I've not read the source material but this seems to be describing the activation of platysma.  I suspect this reference may be better suited the article on that muscle. Ellen.n.hardy (talk) 10:38, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some quick googling reveals that Wolfe explicitly refers to the sternocleidomastoid. This seems fairly plausible; at least one of my acquaintances (an ex-swimmer) has well-developed sternocleidomastoids which stand out quite distinctly beneath the platysma. Choess (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references
Talk:Omohyoid muscle

message: There's currently (December, 2017) nothing in the Omohyoid muscle article that says accurately what the  muscle actually does.  Other muscles "depress" and elevate the hyoid bone.  What is the real function of the Omohyoid?  (In people or in animals?)  It is unusual and mysterious for Wikipedia to describe a muscle's physical shape, insertion, origin, sheathing, layout etc. without disclosing its actual function in the body.  Why would the small, floating hyoid bone in the middle of the throat need to be connected by a long, stringy, bent muscle with the distant shoulderblades?  Is moving the shoulder posteriorly supposed to affect the hyoid?  Does swallowing supposedly involve the shoulders?   2605:6000:ED0D:9E00:15A1:EDC2:8C50:F3B1 (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does it '''do''' ?  What's it '''for'''?
Talk:Erector spinae muscles

message: Spinalis Capitis
I just learned that the spinalis muscle does not have a capitis portion because the muscle it merges with superiorly (semispinalis capitis) makes up the entirety of the muscle "spinalis capitis" would be. Unfortunately I don't have a text to refer to right now. 
Scrycer (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ə-rek-tər spee-nee is incorrect; this should be ə-rek-tər speye-nee as per http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/pronunciation/english/spinae. 72.34.133.249 (talk) 17:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: The recent edits made me examine the infobox more carefully, and it definitely isn't accurate, especially since the muscle group as a whole has attachments to lumbar vertebrae, the sacrum, etc.  Should we just lump all the origins and insertion in together, or somehow subdivide the sections of the infobox for the SP, LD and IL?  If the latter, does anyone know how to do this, since I'm terrible at wiki-coding? Mokele (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin & Insertion 

message: Might be worth adding the purpose of the muscle to the article. I'd do it, but I'm not knowledgeable enough. TotallyNotEtreo 18:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:Interspinales muscles

message: because Interspinales ist Plural in Latin, this article should be renamed to either "Interspinales muscles" or "Interspinalis muscle" --Uwe Gille (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I am removing the rotation and flexion of this muscle from the action, the muscle just does not do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.4.61 (talk) 13:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Action
Talk:Gandhigiri/Archive 1

message: keeep. Gandhigiri should not be merged with Lage Raho Munna Bhai. The term Gandhigiri has already entered the lingo in India. Gandhigiri is being recognised even without a reference to Lage Raho.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it's a commonly used term, but what will be the content of the article? The philosophy has already been covered at Gandhism. Both Lage Raho Munna Bhai and Gandhigiri are short articles. A redirect to Lage Raho Munna Bhai#Gandhigiri will serve the purpose. utcursch | talk 14:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The content will surely grow. Gandhigiri has a slightly different meaning...while Gandhiism is the serious principles, Gandhigiri probably will grow up as a term referring to the practice in real life troubles, in a rather light-hearted sense. We do not know really, it is pretty early to predict the future of this term. IMO, we should let time time before merging, if at all.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merger discussion

message: I propose the following sections for the article:
*Lead (obviously!)
*Etymology (would include what the present etymology and meaning tells)
*Gandhism (would discuss Gandhism in brief, with link to main article Gandhism. Also notable satyagrahas by Gandhi may be included, like Dandi March)
*Gandhigiri in Lage Raho Munna Bhai (would include the theme of the film in two sentences, goal of Hirani with quotes, a few instances of Gandhigiri as shown in the film)
*Socio-cultural influence (would tell examples of Gandhigiri that followed the release of the film)
*Success and failure (would tell the cases of real life Gandhigiris where the methods applied succeeded or failed. Some examples are available in the media.)
*Critique (positive critiques as well as the negative aspects as noted by a few persons)
*Notes, References, External links etc
Please comment on the proposed structure. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for article structure

message: Since this is both a term and a reference to movements which developed, I would like to move the page to Gandhigiri movement.  Thoughts? -Classicfilms 18:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: I have removed these definitions from the main article - which were developed in response to previous edits by other users which lacked references. References are still needed which explain both the origin and the exact meaning of the term. -Classicfilms 18:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add that I placed these portions here after they were contested by other editors. -Classicfilms 19:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage
Talk:Intercostal muscles

message: Are the intercostal muscles considered skeletal muscles, and should it specify on the page somewhere? --203.113.234.163 (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the intercostal muscles considered skeletal muscles, and should it specify on the page somewhere? 

message: there is something wrong with this article.  It's not displaying properly.  Is there a mistake in the syntax somewhere?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.206.212.57 (talk) 02:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  article display  

message: They are found in between ribs Tebellolenyatabernice (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  intercostal muscles 

message: What causes the pain inside of my intercostal muscles? The shark knifelike pains when I turn a certain way or when I bend over it feels like a knife it’s just been turned inside of my ribs. 2600:100C:B22E:3FA8:98D9:5FD0:914A:70C8 (talk) 21:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have severe pains on a daily basis inside of my inner coastal area
Talk:Innermost intercostal muscle

message: These are divided into:
# transversus thoracis anteriorly
# lateral muscle slips laterally (which cross a single intercostal space)
# subcostalis posteriorly (which often cross more than one intercostal space)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaochitz (talk • contribs) 11:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The muscle isn't divided into those muscles, since those are separate muscles. I have now removed them from the article. Lymoz (talk) 11:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this suppose to mean?
Talk:Levatores costarum muscles

message: The article should be renamed in either Levatores costarum muscles (plural) oder Levator costae muscle (singular) --Uwe Gille (talk) 19:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have renamed it to "Levatores costarum muscles". (A note to future editors, wondering why we're using the plural form instead of the singular -- I believe the standard for anatomy is to use plurals only when there are multiples on a single side of the body. The body has two biceps muscles, but we refer to the "biceps muscle". However, for levatores costarum, one exists for each rib. See also Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy/Guidelines#Paired_structures. --Arcadian (talk) 04:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemma
Talk:Coccygeus muscle

message: I am a medical student, and one of my anatomy lecturers said that coccygeus wags the tail of animals that have a tail. Is this true? If so, can it be added to the article with a reference?
FSHero (talk) 18:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added a section to the Levator ani article on this very point, complete with reference. But I did come across another source on Google Books that explicitly mentions the coccygeus. I'm guessing it's not a case of either-or, that the two work in tandem, but unfortunately I've yet to find a source that says as much. Iskunk (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of coccygeus in animals?
Talk:Pubococcygeus muscle

message: can we flag this page for sources? Kellenwright 21:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone and found some so I guess this isn't an issue anymore. Freikorp (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: It is my understanding that the pubococcygeus muscle allows martial artists to withdraw their testicles into the pelvic cavity, so that they would not be injured by a kick to the groin.  Does anyone have a source for this fact?  Would this fact belong in the "Kegel" section?  The article already mentions the effect of the muscle on the cremasteric reflex, so in essence the fact that a martial artist could pull up his testicles is implied, although not stated.  Is this fact worth mentioning in the article?  What would constitute a verifiable source of this information?  ...follow the trail (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sound a bit far-fetched to me. Anyway if a reliable source were found it would probably belong in its own section, e.g. 'use in sports' or something. Finding a reference for that probably isn't going to be any different from finding a source for anything: WP:RS, so no gossip columns, blogs, networking sites etc... established reliable secondary sources only. Freikorp (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  martial arts?
Talk:Melbourne School of Continental Philosophy

message: Since the wikipedia notice went up describing this entry as an advertisement, I have made a number of changes to it. First and foremost, I have added references from third party, verifiable sources, to ground the claims made in the article; secondly, I have tidied up the writing style in an attempt to bring it in line with wikipedia's standards.
Between these two changes, I hope that the problem is moving towards a resolution. By adding substantial references I hope to ground the claims which might otherwise be viewed as subjective. If there are still problems with the article, I would like to know how I can get feedback from a wikipedia editor. Cheers. Prdaniels 14:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have decline to delete the article, as it seems primarily descriptive. I have removed some further programmatic statements. I have also removed some of what I consider excessive tagging, as normally WP  accepts the official website for uncontroversial internal history. 
If any of the statements are actually controversial, they should be discussed on this talk page. DGG (talk) 18:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Abdominal internal oblique muscle

message: I'd like some clarification on this page from someone who knows... can we include as an insertion point the pubic symphysis?  The entry for the transversus abdominus reads "The muscle ends in front in a broad aponeurosis, the lower fibers of which curve downward and medialward, and are inserted, together with WITH THOSE OF THE INTERNAL OBLIQUE MUSCLE, into the crest of the pubis and pectineal line, forming the inguinal aponeurotic falx."  This is not mentioned anywhere on this page, even though it is referenced in the diagram.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobsagat (talk • contribs) 03:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Deep perineal pouch

message: I have been looking over the Wikipedia articles on the urethral sphincter, external urethral sphincter, internal urethral sphincter and this one.  They all deal with similar topics. I suggest that they be merged. The term "urethral sphincter" without any other qualification, i.e., external or internal, is not in current usage. I suggest that the page dealing with this term become a redirection page for the two different terms. The "internal urethral sphincter" could be redirected to the page on the urinary bladder, and the "external urethral sphincter" could be redirected here, as the external sphincter is one of the muscles of the deep perineal pouch.
The content of the present article needs to be improved and expanded. There are various inaccuracies which need to be fixed. The section on "structure" does not deal with the internal structure of the pouch, which should also be described. Neural control of the musculature is not mentioned, neither is the vasculature supplying it. This page could also include descriptions of the external urethral sphincters in the male and the female, which are simply an indistinct part of the other musculature in the deep perineal pouch. Rbatra55 (talk) 03:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Parakey

message: I feel that the word stuff under JUL could be elaborated on, EZtaR 14:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Isn't this totally boring vaporware? -- 68.164.168.162 05:00, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Vaporware -- yes, so far. Boring? No, given their previous track record (Firefox, Firebug, iphone.facebook.com). Josephgrossberg 14:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, it looks like the site has disappeared off the face of the earth. Psychcf (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaporware
Talk:List of crime films of the 1970s

message: I've added three sources referring to the film as a crime film. Allmovie, a site used by notable sources such as the New York Times. The British Film Institute has a whole section dedicated to the film in it's book on crime films, and the company that released the film on home video Criteron Collection, in an essay by Phillip Lopate states that The Killing of a Chinese Bookie "Cassavetes even fulfills the genre contract with action sequences (rare for him) that involve shootings, chases, and sinister under lit garages, perhaps drawing on his own past experience as an actor in crime movies.". I have three strong sources aligning it to a genre. Just because it fits it in, doesn't mean it's going to be like Scarface or something. Crime films can very in style and artfulness anyways. Le Samourai by Melville isn't exactly the same as Goodfellas or Pulp Fiction. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Bookie
Talk:List of crime films of the 1990s

message: Hello, I'm here to end dispution of prison films being added to this list. According to this site, the prison film is a sub-genre of the crime film. I believe these films should be included then. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I know, I haven't heard anyone say "In the crime film The Shawshank Redemption" or "The Shawshank Redemption great crime film". Prison films should be lumped into drama. 200.161.62.153 (talk) 14:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not the point. It is a subgenre of the crime film and should be included on this basis. It's not like Goodfellas or The Public Enemy, but unless you find more evidence otherwise that the Prison film should not be included in a list of crime films, then this should still be included. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prison film
Talk:Bender tent

message: I've added links to portable dwellings that are, or can be, made out of natural materials. I was very tempted to add Hogans and Dugout (shelter) since these can also be made from natural materials, but as they are non-portable, decided not to.
:Personally think that Hogans and Dugout are relevant and could be added to the the see also section. Cheers! RichardMills65 (talk) 19:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: These are already treated here: Indigenous architecture. Please use links instead. Kortoso  (talk) 22:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 

message: From all evidence, a "bender tent" is just a British term for wigwam, which I think should be the central article here. Discuss!. Kortoso  (talk) 22:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wigwam
Template talk:Infobox pinball

message: I'm reviewing a page where the original release of the game was in 1972.  Bally's subsequently released a 'classic' updated version in 1985.  I'm trying to add the information about the 1985 release to the infobox.  I added title2, designer2, release2, etc. however it's not displaying.  Adding this information to the original page makes more sense that creating a new page/infobox.  Does the template need to be updated in order to accomodate?
Expandinglight5 (talk) 01:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-releases and classic versions
Talk:That's My Boy (1932 film)

message: What's with the de-linking of this one actor?  If other minor actors merit a redlink, so does Douglas Haig. 64.105.65.28 (talk) 20:10, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Douglas Haig 

message: Landesman indicates that the appearance of John Wayne in this film is via stock footage used in football scenes. Gab4gab (talk) 18:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Wayne
Category talk:Football clubs in the Gambia

message: cher equipe c est avec grand plaisir que si vous m inviter a venir jouer dans votre pays si bon vous voulez car j ai envis vraiment de jouer dans votre club moi, meme je suis au togo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.248.73.230 (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  invitation de venir jouer