lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mississippi gopher frog

message: A Gopher Frog Recovery Team oversees conservation strategies that include pond water supplementation in dry years, habitat management, assisting tadpole survival, captive rearing, construction of alternative-breeding ponds, and treating infected tadpoles.[3] This program needs to be continued and expanded. Surveys are needed to check the status of the recently discovered populations, and to determine whether or not the species survives elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doobie61 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 
Talk:Albanian water frog

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:BennyTrapp Pelophylax shquipericus Montenegro.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 7, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-09-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:BennyTrapp Pelophylax shquipericus Montenegro.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Functional design

message: I believe that the term "functional design" encompasses a range larger than that of software. I've heard the term used in relationship to product design as well.
Kamesho 23:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the term has a broader scope. I made an edit to clarify this. Oicumayberight (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:List of Japanese World War II radars

message: Specifically refering to USS Batfish which destroyed 3 IJN submarines by tracking them initially (in each instance) by their radar emissions.  The Japanese radar seemed incapable of seeing Batfish, even though they approached within 2 miles (in one case perhaps much less than one mile).  The Batfish crew speculated that this was an air-warning radar (which like Batfish's own earlier radar was non-directional and ignored surface contacts, it simply warned of any aircraft in the vicinity).  None of the radars listed in this article would seem to fit this description and there is no mention of any sub deployed systems for the IJN.  Can someone with any knowledge of this subject please contribute any information on sub-based IJN radars?Pmarshal (talk) 17:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of submarine deployed radar 

message: I'm sorry to have to report that the hyperlink to Reference 2 (Martin Favorite, Japanese Radar Of World War II) currently redirects to a casino website. NOT what we need!RaynesParkGuy (talk) 11:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wayward link in References section 4 May 2016
Talk:Hum, Istria County

message: Why is here the population counted to up to 23 and in the German Wiki is it pronounced as 18! What is the correct number? --B.Mothes (talk) 23:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: Is there a typo?  Does the present church stand on the side of the earlier church or was it built on the site where the earlier church used to stand?
WangSejong (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Jerome Built on "Site" or "Side" of Earlier Church? 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Psychonaut (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Article says "It's also the smallest town in the world.", and also says that it is 13 square kilometers. But there are many towns that are smaller than that. For example, Slavutich (Ukraine, 2.53km2), Rendville (USA, 0.80km2), etc. Pryaniker (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's not the smallest town
Talk:André Troeme

message: This article should be combined with the one entitled André Trocmé, as that is the actual name of the man in this article. Jesus geek 23:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, i'm merging. If i screw something up, let me know. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Cream bun

message: "cream bun" is by no means limited to Hong Kong or Chinese bakeries, though they may be common there. If you type the words "cream bun" into google books you will find many instances in English and American literature going back to the late 19th C. And there are non-Anglo-American analogs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.250.51 (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cream bun
Talk:Tripoli–Cape Town Highway

message: I deleted this statement from an anonymous contributor:
"Parts of the highway in Libya are closed due to military envolvement [sic] for Operation Enduring Freedom - Trans Sahara."
No evidence is offered in the references for the linked article that ongoing military action has closed the highway, which, in any case, does not yet exist across the Libyan-Chad border, as is made clear in the highway article. The statement or something similar can be put back if a reference is provided linking highway closure to such military action. Rexparry sydney 00:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Enduring Freedom in southern Libya 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Booyabazooka

message: User:Booyabazooka
      run at Tue Jul 24 00:01:34 2007 GMT
Category talk:	6
Category:	119
Help:	1
Image talk:	7
Image:	166
Mainspace	4857
Portal:	9
Talk:	285
Template talk:	31
Template:	188
User talk:	250
User:	773
Wikipedia talk:	25
Wikipedia:	232
avg edits per page	1.65
earliest	03:38, 20 October 2002
number of unique pages	4207
total	6949
2002/10 	37 	
2002/11 	2 	
2002/12 	0 	
2003/1 	0 	
2003/2 	0 	
2003/3 	1 	
2003/4 	0 	
2003/5 	0 	
2003/6 	0 	
2003/7 	0 	
2003/8 	0 	
2003/9 	0 	
2003/10 	0 	
2003/11 	0 	
2003/12 	0 	
2004/1 	0 	
2004/2 	0 	
2004/3 	0 	
2004/4 	0 	
2004/5 	0 	
2004/6 	1 	
2004/7 	0 	
2004/8 	146 	
2004/9 	104 	
2004/10 	4 	
2004/11 	7 	
2004/12 	4 	
2005/1 	3 	
2005/2 	0 	
2005/3 	1 	
2005/4 	13 	
2005/5 	81 	
2005/6 	3 	
2005/7 	6 	
2005/8 	1 	
2005/9 	0 	
2005/10 	1 	
2005/11 	2 	
2005/12 	4 	
2006/1 	4 	
2006/2 	142 	
2006/3 	104 	
2006/4 	133 	
2006/5 	1067 	
2006/6 	1030 	
2006/7 	1113 	
2006/8 	1023 	
2006/9 	272 	
2006/10 	124 	
2006/11 	265 	
2006/12 	340 	
2007/1 	319 	
2007/2 	128 	
2007/3 	53 	
2007/4 	85 	
2007/5 	80 	
2007/6 	137 	
2007/7 	109 	
Booyabazooka's editcount summary stats as of 01:01 July 24th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 00:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Caknuck

message: User:Caknuck
      run at Tue Jul 24 00:03:55 2007 GMT
Category:	16
Image talk:	1
Image:	30
Mainspace	4670
Portal:	20
Talk:	227
Template talk:	2
Template:	116
User talk:	582
User:	215
Wikipedia talk:	83
Wikipedia:	1266
avg edits per page	1.38
earliest	04:44, 5 August 2006
number of unique pages	5248
total	7228
2006/8 	527 	
2006/9 	468 	
2006/10 	683 	
2006/11 	400 	
2006/12 	162 	
2007/1 	679 	
2007/2 	985 	
2007/3 	738 	
2007/4 	707 	
2007/5 	525 	
2007/6 	585 	
2007/7 	769 	
Caknuck's editcount summary stats as of 01:03, July 24th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 00:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chiromantis kelleri

message: I added the see also section, linking to other frogs in their genus. Carolinaalisio (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added See Also section
Talk:Chiromantis petersii

message: I added the see also section, linking to other frogs in their genus. Carolinaalisio (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added See Also section
Template talk:History of Hawaii

message: Why is Kingdom of Hawaii on twice?  Is it an attempt to make this into a timeline?  If it is, I think this only makes it confusing.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 19:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost a year later I thought the same. Why is Kingdom of Hawaii on twice? --Catalaalatac (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingdom of Hawaii
Talk:Tommy Smith

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose - no convincing reason for the change. Looking at the edit histories for some of the articles, we see:
::Tommy Smith (Liverpool footballer): 50 edits since 23 January 2006
::Tommy Smith (Watford footballer): 50 edits since 30 August 2006
::Tommy Smith (saxophonist): 50 edits since 04 November 2005
::Tommy Smith (DJ): 50 edits since 06 August 2005
:There is not a huge disparity in frequency of edits between these articles; while there has been an increase at the Liverpool article recently, it is not sufficient to warrant that article taking precedence over the other ones. As well, a Google search on the name has hits for the saxophonist and a track star first. --Ckatzchatspy 00:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with HornetMike about sorting the footballers out using years of birth, preferably after a dab page has been set which explains where all the Tommy Smiths are, WikiGull 08:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my idea at first on my talk page which seemed pretty much dismissed! Seems the most fair and right way for it to be done. Mattythewhite 08:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
:I don't support disambiguating players according to their current team. Players are known to change team with notable frequency, so they should be disambiguated by birth year rather than the club they are playing for. --Angelo 19:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Users are free to move articles.  Is there a standard for these players concerning disambiguation? Vegaswikian 20:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that disambiguating by the current team seems pretty silly during their playing careers, and it won't work for all players after retirement either. Year of birth might be a possibility. How exactly would it be implemented? Andrewa 15:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could check to see if there is a wiki project in this area and ask there.  Or look in the categories to see what other articles have done. You could simply announce your intention on the article talk page with your reason.  If no serious objections go ahead and make the move.  If the proposed target already exists, you would have to come back here.  They should all be uncontested moves so the shorter process would apply. Vegaswikian 20:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 06:29, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Patriots: A Nation Under Fire

message: It seems that the passage about WHY the game got the discrimination tag ("from the content of the game, it's apparent" etc.) is conjecture and original research. I was looking through the rather amusing (in its randomness) list of games that PEGI slapped this tag on, and wanted to check why this game in particular. If one was just speculating, it could absolutely go both ways — it's obvious that the game isn't too nuanced on depicting terrorists (they are just abstract Muslims fundamentalists that invade and you shoot them).
Of course this is not that important, but if the mentioned passage is conjecture, it was inserted in bad faith ("game could not be interpreted to be stereotyping Muslims"). And Discrimination tag's description talks specifically about stereotyping; e. g. Postal 2 itself never got the tag, but its Multiplayer add-on and one DLC did (maybe they contained some specific stereotyping phrases?).
This topic is amusing and weird: for example, it **seems** that the Czech game Original War got the discrimination tag because the Soviets were badmouthing Americans as dirty thieves (since in the game US did indeed cheat the USSR out of world domination). And SWAT: Target Liberty **seems** to be about nobly stamping out pervasive Korean-American crime, which could lead to stereotypes being thrown around. So it would be interesting to find out, if possible, what was the real deal with Patriots: A Nation Under Fire.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AyeBraine (talk • contribs) 16:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Interpretation of "Discrimination" tag
Talk:Raorchestes chalazodes

message: — Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: I implemented significant changes and corrections to the grammar and sentence structure throughout this article. Especially in the parental care section, I reordered the entire section so that the section on egg guarding flowed more coherently. Under the habitat and distribution section, I attempted to improve the sentence "this bamboo forms a shrubby habitat that often forms impenetrable clumps next to stream banks". Due to the use of the word "impenetrable", I assumed that the this kind of habitat offers some kind of protection, but I recommend this part to be further explained.  Froggo1324 (talk) 22:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What I changed: the updated Wikipedia page was very strong, but I noticed Olachandra travorica was not italicized although it was a scientific name. The discussion on holotype confused me originally and it was unclear to me whether the holotype continued to apply or if there were more individuals present today. In order to better cement the notion that the numbers are higher than 1, I researched an article and added its sampling to the conservation section. Luiscville (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:Martyrs of Compiègne

message: Newkirk, Terrye. The Mantle of Elijah: The Martyrs of Compiègne as Prophets of the Modern Age. https://archive.org/details/mantleofelijahma0000newk. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for further improvement 

message: The tag added to this article in January 2024 is misplaced and should be removed. Yes, it needs improvement and perhaps further research, but there's currently enough sources to warrant its start-class status. Currently, it heavily uses the Bush source, but it also uses 11 additional ones. I also don't understand the claim that the sources are too close to its subject; Bush's publisher, ICS Publications, focuses on the Discalced Carmelite saints, but that doesn't mean it's unreliable. Please either work on improvement this article or remove the tag. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 80% of the references in the articles are a single source.  The question is not if ICS Publications is unreliable, it's if it is closely related to the subject of the article which it is. Klaun (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues tag
Talk:Duality (electrical circuits)

message: This article was previously marked as lacking any references, but there was a reference at the bottom, so I pulled the tag.
Reinderien 00:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of references?

message: How is the duality of Kirchhopff's laws expressed mathematically? The current law is div J=0. what is the dual for the voltage law?Koilon (talk) 18:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duality and Kirchhoff's Laws 

message: I would recommend to formulate the duality statements in such a way that the order of variables in the left-hand side and the right-hand side is the same. Schematically:  i=G(v) <=> F(i)=v  rather than i=G(v) <=> v=F(i). But to be honest, I do not know the convention in this field.
130.89.12.143 (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely don't do that.  It would be a bad scheme.  This article is about duality and dual quantities should be shown in corresponding positions. SpinningSpark 11:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Textual formulation
Talk:Pseudophilautus hoffmanni

message: These two species of frogs were synonymized in 2021. See AmphibiaWeb source. ASW lists P. hoffmanni as "likely conspecific," or rather it cites a study that does so. Thoughts? Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with ''P. asankai''
Talk:Nasutixalus jerdonii

message: The article is contradictory about how many species there are in this genus.  The article introduces the genus as "monotypic" with a "sole species", but later describes an additional "unnamed species".  Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this is a contradiction that needs to be resolved.  72.94.61.22 (talk) 20:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The paper just published by Bidu et al identified eight of the specimens that they collected as conspecific with the type specimen of Polypedates jerdonii, which they have proposed to move to a new genus Frankixalus. Their DNA testing also identified three specimens which they they regard as belonging to a closely related species congeneric with Frankixalus jerdoni. One of those specimens had previously been (mis)identified by another group as Theloderma moloch. So the genus is, for the moment, formally monotypic, but the authors who erected it clearly indicate that it should include a second species, which may be new to science. I agree the article doesn't explain it very well. William Avery (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  The article makes more sense to me now.  72.94.61.22 (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many species in the genus? 

message: I've been reading about Frankixalus jerdonii on various websites which claim that the young eat their mother's eggs and the adults are vegetarians. Can this be verified? A vegetarian amphibian? If this is true, I'm amazed. Are there any other vegetarian amphibians, either extant or extinct? 2601:98A:400:82F8:3C8B:558E:9143:2C06 (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vegetarian frog?
Talk:Tenbun

message: The following data was posted without verifying source citations.  It has been moved here pending verfication ... but the more interesting question has to do with whether this kind of additional information would be potentially helpful in all the Nengō articles?  Such a project would involve a lot of work for someone -- but it's not something I'm interested in developing.  Presumably, the editor who added these two sections also felt unwilling to invest the level of work needed for full metastasis? 
===Births in the Tenbun era===
* Tenbun 1 (1542):  Luis Frois, Society of Jesus missionary  [died Keichō 2 (1597)].
* Tenbun 3, the 12th day of the 5th month (June 23, 1544):  Oda Nobunaga [died Tenshō 10 (1582)].
* Tenbun 4 (1545):  Princess Nō, wife of Oda Nobunaga [died Keichō 10 (1605)].
* Tenbun 5, the 1st day of the 1st month (1536):  Hideyoshi Toyotomi [died Keichō 3 (1598)].
* Tenbun 5, the 10th day of the 3rd month (March 31, 1546):  Ashikaga Yoshiteru, 13th Shōgun of the Ashikaga shogunate [died Eiroku 8 (1565)].
* Tenbun 6, the 3rd day of the 11th month (December 5, 1537):  Ashikaga Yoshiaki, 15th Shōgun of the Ashikaga shogunate [died Keichō 2 (1597)].
* Tenbun 7, the 25th day of the 12th month (1539):  Maeda Toshiie, general [died Keichō 4 (1599)].
* Tenbun 7 (1538):  Ashikaga Yoshihide, 14th Shōgun of the Ashikaga shogunate  [died Eiroku 11 (1568)
* Tenbun 9 (1540): Toyotomi Hidenagi's half-brother, general  [died Tenshō 19 (1591)].
* Tenbun 11 (1542):  Hattori Masanari (also known as Hattori Masashige or Hanzō), general  [died Keichō 1 or Keichō Gannen (1596)].
* Tebun 11, the 26th day of the 12th month (January 30, 1543):  Tokugawa Ieyasu, first Shogun of the Edo Bakufu  [died Genna 2 (1616)].
* Tenbun 16 (1547):  Oda Nagamasu, younger brother of Oda Nobunaga [died Genna 7 (1621)].
===Deaths in the Tenbun era===
* Tenbun 10, the 13th day of the 11th month (November 30, 1541):   Amago Tsunehisa, general   [born Chōroku 2 (1458)].
* Tenbun 18 (1449):  Oda Nobuhide, general, father of Oda Nobunaga  [born Eishō 7  (1510)].<:ref name="t379">Titsingh, p. 379.</ref>
* Tenbun 19, the 4th day of the 5th month (May 20, 1550):  Ashikaga Yoshiharu, 12th Shōgun of the Ashikaga shogunate  [born Eishō 8 (1511)].<:ref name="t379"/>
In brief, the question becomes "Is this a good idea?" --Tenmei (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arguably useful addition

message: * Tenbun 10, the 13th day of the 11th month (November 30, 1541):   Amago Tsunehisa, general   [born Chōroku 2 (1458)].
* Tenbun 18 (1449):  Oda Nobuhide, general, father of Oda Nobunaga  [born Eishō 7  (1510)].<:ref name="t379">Titsingh, p. 379.</ref>
* Tenbun 19, the 4th day of the 5th month (May 20, 1550):  Ashikaga Yoshiharu, 12th Shōgun of the Ashikaga shogunate  [born Eishō 8 (1511)].<:ref name="t379"/>
In brief, the question becomes "Is this a good idea?" --Tenmei (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deaths in the ''Tenbun'' era
Talk:Spruce Creek Airport

message: Maybe this article name should be changed to Spruce Creek Airport to keep the Realtor from cluttering this page. This is not the first time he's done it. Gamweb (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - Done. Oh and I did leave a comment on that user's talk page. Thanks for letting me know! --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 14:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name to Spruce Creek Airport?
Talk:History of the Soviet Union

message: * I just discovered that History of the Soviet Union doesn't even summarize the named topic, and have reclassified the article as "Start class".  This urgently requires attention. —Michael Z. 2007-07-21 19:34 Z
*:While M.Z. correctly pinpointed the problem, his description is confusing. The problem is rooted in early days of wikipedia when user:172, who is credited with the whole wikipedia's Sovoiet history, attempted a non-standard way to handle the splitting of this huge topic into subarticles. I made the initial move and posted the note at the Soviet portal. `'Míkka 00:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Russian Notice Board

message: While I admit that the topic is huge, this article is still needed: people have limited reading time. Andries (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of other articles is still necessary

message: A  template must be created to replace 
 which sits in these articles. `'Míkka 00:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TODO
Talk:Raorchestes parvulus

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on December 18, 2019. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2019-12-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|Raorchestes parvulus (male).jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon