lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of LPGA major championship winning golfers

message: The Span heading should show the span from the player's first major win until their last major win. I changed the heading to clarify this and match List of men's major championships winning golfers for example of how this should be applied.   --Crunch (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What '''Span''' Heading Means 

message: There is currently a mismatch between the article title and its content. Shall we:
#Rename this article to reflect that all major winners are listed (e.g. List of LPGA major championship winning golfers)
#Apply selection criteria and remove those below a certain threshold (3 or 4  seems to make sense)?
The similar "men's" article was moved. Thoughts please. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have thought option 1 makes most sense. As you imply, there's really no sense in option 2 unless you're going for 3 or (probably) 4 or 5 as a minimum Nigej (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Option 1 Tewapack (talk) 17:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename or apply criteria?
Talk:Arzen

message: == Dynasty ==
Do you mean the Shaybanids, the Uzbek dynasty?  That seems strange to me, I'll find out if it's true.  Also, if you do mean the Shaybanids, then your dates must be Hijri, which should be indicated.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by  Baristarim  (talk • contribs)  2007-03-30 02:49:45 (UTC)
‎  
== Erzurum (Provinz) and Arzen ==
Erzurum Province is not the same as Arzen?
Karmela (talk) 08:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Erzurum Province is not the same as Arzen?
Karmela (talk) 08:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erzurum (Provinz) and Arzen
Talk:Kolf

message: Why is the page not simply called 'kolf'? The name of the sport is 'kolf', while 'kolven' is a verb meaning 'to play kolf'.
It would make much more sense for this page to be called 'kolf'.2A02:A46B:8ACF:1:19D8:A0DF:B868:68A8 (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  title of page 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kolven →  – Wikipedia titles are to be nouns. "Kolf" is the name of the game. "Kolven" is a verb meaning to play that game. It's plainly incorrectly titled. oknazevad (talk) 05:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom  --- Tbf69 P • T 11:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 March 2023
Talk:Chuiwan

message: I created the page chuiwan on the wictionary. Should we keep this article as is or move what is here to History of golf? Or should we put chuiwan kolven and the definitions of the others all on one article called origin of golf. It just seems unnessessary for chuiwan to have its own article. username 1 (talk) 18:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They (Wikipedia & Wiktionary) are two separate projects and should not be confused. Chuiwan is distinct from golf and any attempt to merge into a golf article would be inappropriate. Any discussion on whether it should be kept should be reserved for an AfD, but I can see no reason for deletion. wjematherbigissue 18:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Chuiwan is not golf. It is a game in its own right and a possible forerunner of golf, that is all. Likewise for kolven, or any other stick and ball game. They are mentioned appropriately in golf and history of golf as related games. They are notable in their own right and should have separate articles. wjematherbigissue 18:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:Religious views on masturbation

message: @IP: whatever you write here, you have to WP:CITE WP:SOURCES. Your own opinion is banned according to website policy, see WP:OR.
The WP:BURDEN is upon you to produce WP:RS which WP:V your claims. Don't expect me to find sources for views that I have never heard of.
You want to be believed upon your word of honor. But principally we don't believe anyone on their word of honor. So, you will always have to cite sources for your edits.
Just in case I wasn't clear: if it is your own research, drop it. We are not a substitute for academic publishing, nor are we a vanity press. Combining two or more WP:RS to mean something new is not allowed, see WP:SYNTH. Each and every of your claims has to be explicitly WP:V in 1 (one) WP:RS. You are allowed to paraphrase that WP:RS in your own words, you are not allowed to change its meaning.
E.g. source #1 makes claim A, source #2 makes claim B. You think that A and B imply C. You are allowed to state A and then state B. You are not allowed to state C. tgeorgescu (talk)  03:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: I was thinking about the current "excessive citations" tags. There is a recommendation at WP:BUNDLING to bundle them into a single footnote. But it is a bit difficult to do that nicely when the references are also used in other places. So I was thinking to use the shortened footnotes style for the article. This also makes it a bit easier to include quotes. Example for the first tag in "Biblical scholarship":
Also in general, for this article where we have a lot of scholars, sources, and quotes, shortened footnotes seem like a good fit. But there is the warning in WP:CITEVAR to seek consensus first - does anyone have objections? Mathnerd314159 (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, go ahead. I think that the form of the citations only matters to computer nerds. tgeorgescu (talk)  04:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortened footnote style? 

message: Using https://wordcounter.net/ and copying and pasting the entirety of the section on Christianity into the website, the total word count from "early church" to the citation 210, is a staggering 11,787 words. The page is section is far to long to read even a quarter of it comfortably (WP:CANYOUREADTHIS) as it's the length of an entire article on its own while Judaism and Taoism has 2 paragraphs, Buddhism 8, and Islam, Wicca and Hinduism have 1 about them each, and Islam and Judaism both link to their own articles.
I suggest drastically shortening and deleting numerous paragraphs of the section and after giving this section its own its own page, it seems reliable to me but I have little knowledge of Christianity and have heavily skimmed it too. 92.236.211.53 (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting a separate article for the Christian section
Talk:Negadon: The Monster from Mars

message: I read this movie is just about 25 minutes of length. --87.168.63.9 (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 
Category talk:Ghost towns in Oregon

message: Discussion of deletion of this category, and the what ghost town means occurred at Category talk:Census-designated places in Oregon#Ghost towns.  —EncMstr 19:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of ghost town

message: Kerby, OR has a bogus entry on ghosttowns.com attribued to "Henry Chenoweth", it reads like uncited material with some invention.  Significantly (much more than 50%, based on a page of google examinations - see my recent edits for the list I looked at) of the other wikipedia cites of ghosttowns.com are attributed to the same author.  As a source it seems extremely unreliable - it is a an advertising site of some description operated by Atjeu LLC. Jbowler (talk) 07:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, Chenoweth seems to be an armchair ghost towner who gets all of his information from books. The entry on Shelburn, Oregon is from a 38-year-old book. So although it's true the site is an unreliable source, I don't think Chenoweth is in cahoots with the site owners to mislead people or to put down small towns by calling them ghost towns, they simply accept all submissions without checking them. (For example, it places Bonanza in Klamath County though the place that's a ghost town is in Grant County, and Chenoweth has combined the info from both places for his entry. The Zena, Oregon entry is based entirely on the Wikipedia article and links therein, and includes inaccurate information that I recently removed from the Zena article.) Three books on Oregon ghost towns, by Florin, Miller and Varney, however, all mention Kerby. I plan to revise the inclusion criteria for this category with a full explanation in the category's intro. The criteria will include towns that experienced a boom (logging, mining, railroad, etc.) and bust cycle, with a significant drop in population and well-preserved old buildings, and listing in at least two books on ghost towns. The criteria will include full citations and won't just be my opinion, and each place listed will need to have citations within the article as well. Not every small town counts as a ghost town, though some might count as "defunct". I'm a bit skeptical of the three Riverside entries, for example. However, Jacksonville is mentioned often and fits the criteria, though it is certainly not deserted. Katr67 (talk) 14:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Chenoweth, ghosttowns.com
Talk:Trans-Caspian Oil Transport System

message: Can somebody explain how this pipeline is going to "bypass Russia"? Will it go through Turkmenistan and Iran? Then it will be far more than 700 km. Voyevoda 09:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If constructed, it will be offshore pipeline on the seabed of Caspian Sea. However, it's not possible to build any offshore pipeline before settlement of Caspian disputes.Beagel 16:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Russia will never allow the trans-Caspian to run through its portion of the sea. This creates a huge problem for construction, because the portion of the Caspian that is easiest to build through will belong to Russia. If the line only went through the Kazakh and Azerbaijani portions of the sea, it would have to run as deep as 3,363 feet -- not an easy task. This means if the Europeans were to build the line, it would cost much more than the initially estimated $5 billion".
I'm not sure where you got the info as to having to run as deep as 3,363 feet as a quick look on the Britannica website shows a map with seabed contours there is one spot where the sea goes that deep but they would have to go out of their way to  hit that point and a quick eyeball of it, it would be quite easy to put a route where it would have to go no deeper than 500m (aprox 1500ft). Philbentley 21:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: what is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.229.228.50 (talk) 13:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "proposed" but "could be operational by 2010" 
Talk:Jeremy Sams

message: Edited the stuff about Michael Blakemore, see NYT review. 84.70.76.214 09:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has had a sources required tag for 13 years. Almost none of the claims in the article are sourced and are likely from the subject himself or someone closely related. Please add some sources to avoid deletion of the article. Ashmoo (talk) 10:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Spa 24 Hours

message: Is there a reference for the number of pitstops taking during the race?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.220.26 (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the number you need to finish. It isn't a set number. --Falcadore (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of stops? 

message: Dilano van 't Hoff died at the FRECA support race for the 2023 edition of the 24 hours. Celebrations surrounding the 2023 race were subsequently cancelled and a minute of silence is to be observed  -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 12:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 2023 race
Category talk:Parks in Portland, Oregon

message: If I were looking for parks in Portland, I'm not sure Geography would be the first place I'd look. Why the need to lump this into a geog cat? Katr67 (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category? 

message: The articles in this category include not only municipal parks but also country parks, state parks, and national parks, whatever.  To make this category correct, we would have to remove these non-municipal articles from here and create a parent cat called :Category:Parks in Portland, Oregon.  Any questions? Hmains (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem with this category
Talk:In Love Again

message: Should someone mention the refrain at the end being a cover of sorts to 'Head over Heels' by Tears for Fears?
::Yes, done. --Stu 00:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Suzuka 10 Hours

message: : Not moved at this time. Proposal may be reopened in the future. Station1 (talk) 07:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest waiting a bit and seeing how much longer they run the race at this shorter length.  The original explanation was that it was dshortened merely due to the economic situation. The359 (Talk) 17:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am willing to keep it on hold for the time being to see if the economy improves. Donnie Park (talk) 18:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:6 Hours of Monza

message: There's a LOT of issues with continuity (ie which races to consider part of a races' history) of many race pages, often sportscar races, on Wikipedia. Often there is little if any citations for these.  I made a post on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports_Car_Racing#Continuity_of_Races about this, in particular the Los Angeles Times Grand Prix and 1000 km Monza, and would appreciate input from others, thanks. A7V2 (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity of Race 

message: It seems there was or it was called 6 hour race in 1980.  185.18.60.191 (talk) 03:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this. According to Aldo Zana's book, the 1980 Monza 1000km, in spite of its name, was actually run over 6 hours (and this is the race won by Desire Wilson mentioned in the link you put. I have changed the table to reflect this. A7V2 (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1980
Talk:Targa Florio

message: Top Gear Season 4, Ep8 claims that the first ever Targa Florio was orgnanized by the first man on the island with an automobile, and that the first race he organized was between his car, a man on a horse and a man on a bicycle. It claims that the horse won, which is believable for the era. I know that much of what is said on Top Gear is not to be regarded as truth, but this doesn't sound like something that they just made up out of thin air. What is the deal with this story, and if it's true, wouldn't it be relevant to this page?
Idumea47b (talk) 05:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, according to  this is perhaps half-true. It doesn't give a year (although from the text, presumably before 1903) but Vincenzo Florio apparently did organise a race between his car, a horse and a bicycle, but not actually the Targa Florio of course. Potentially worth a mention here or in Vincenzo Florio I suppose. A7V2 (talk) 11:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First race won by a horse? 

message: It's now 2023. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The 3rd Targa Florio Australian Tribute 2019 will be held..." needs updating
Talk:Snegurochka

message: This article repeats some wide-spread, but erroneous rumors about prohibition of the tree in Soviet Russia from the revolution to 1935.
Although such rumors happen to be told even in some low-quality scientific publications, they are obviously not true, but some sort of jumping to conclusions based on misinterpretation.
Maybe Christmas parties were prohibited as Christmas ones. But if we mean this, Christmas parties were not reintroduced in 1935.
If we mean winter-holiday parties and spruce-trees (without sorting Christmas from New Year), the tradition of children parties with trees was not prohibited, it was even supported by communists.
As an example. After the revolution preschools (kindergartens) emerged in Russia, they were state-run. The main contributor to musical upbringing in the kindergartens of Leningrad was N. N. Dolomanova. She was the head of the musical department of an institute (university), her books and papers were published by state publishing companies, she was more or less the official voice of the communist state in preschool education.
Among the books published by Dolomanova are:
* Н.Н. Доломанова. За ёлочкой. Пьеса для маленьких детей, с приложением песен Лядова. Пг., Начатки знаний, Труды Музея «Дошкольная жизнь ребёнка», 1923 (Going for the [New Year] spruce tree. Short play for little children, 1923)
* Н.Н. Доломанова. Дед-Мороз развеселил. Сценка для маленьких детей, с руководящей ролью для одного взрослого, с приложением песен Кюи, Лядова и др. Пг., Начатки знаний; Труды Музея «Дошкольная жизнь ребёнка», Детская театральная библиотека, N2 (серия); 1923 (Ded Moroz amused us. Short play for little children, 1923)
and, the most persuasive,
* Н.Н. Доломанова, Снегурочка к детям на елку пришла. Сценка у елки для маленьких детей с прилож. музыки Римского-Корсакова, Лядова и Кюи. «Начатки знаний», 1923 (Snegurochka came for a children's New Year party, 1923)
Similar New Year parties with spruce trees were in Moscow schools, according to the journal Вестник просвещения (Jan 1923).
But from the 1924 there was a campaign against the religious Christmas holiday (although the school and kindergarten parties had become New Year parties by that time). The parties were not prohibited but discouraged. The same journal Вестник просвещения writes in Jan 1924 that schools tried to ban New Year parties but parents struggled for them. New Year was widely celebrated at least until 1930, by 1930 schools started promoting the idea that trees were good for human health and beauty of the nature.
So we can see that new-year-tree parties were not prohibited soon after revolution. They were widely organized and supported by the state until about 1923, from 1924 they were banned at schools, but they were never prohibited as private celebrations. Later than 1924, but not later than 1930, schools started propaganda against holiday trees, though they were never banned.
2001:4898:80E8:1:0:0:0:299 (talk) 20:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prohibition of Christmas trees in Russia after the revolution
Talk:The Sims Castaway Stories

message: We need an english boxshot for this as soon as one becomes available.--Crossmr 22:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English boxshot 

message: Okay, there seems to be A LOT of confusion around this game, so let me clear a few things up:
* This is a Standalone game for the PC
* this is the third in the Sims Stories series of games, following Life Stories and Pet Stories
* EA recently published a game called The Sims 2: Castaway on several console platforms This is a different game, entirely.
* The release date for this game is Winter 2008, which does refer to the beginning of the year, not the end.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.43.34 (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: your evidence that winter 2008 refers to the beginning of the year? Sounds like your opinion. I might consider december 2008 to be part of winter 2008.--Crossmr (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To clear it even more, the game has been released today. --Allvanishing (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop the confusion!
Talk:Ivan Tsarevich

message: There is, as far as I can remember, Ivan the Fool in the tale 'Tsarevna the frog', not Ivan Tsarevich. --89.110.15.19 13:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Ivan Tsarevich (Russian: Иван Царевич or Иван-царевич - literally John the Prince)
How can Ivan be translated literally to John? Either it is translated literally to Ivan, or it is not a literal translation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tritium6 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ivan is a transliteration.  John is indeed the equivalent English name.  Goldfritha 00:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name translation
Talk:IMSA

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: both moved. The concerns of the 'conditional support' !voter are noted; if further information comes up to imply that the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC conclusion drawn in this discussion was incorrect, no prejudice against further nomination.   Vaticidalprophet (talk) 10:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 March 2021
Talk:Deutsche Rennsport Meisterschaft

message: I would like to make it clear that like so many pages here, it was sourced from numerous sites rather than copying it entirely. Willirennen 02:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for Speedy Deletion 

message: I removed the External Link named "Full DRM results page"
The link www.wspr-racing.com/wspr/results/drm/nf_drm_home.html has been compromised, it now leads to a Rogue security software page.Netweezurd (talk) 23:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed link 

message: The redirect Gelo Racing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  SpacedFarmer (talk) 21:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Gelo Racing]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:School districts in Oregon

message: http://web.archive.org/web/19991012015831/http://www.osba.org/edlinks/districts.htm has lists of district websites from previous eras
The Oregon Department of Education pointed to the OSBA list http://web.archive.org/web/20060923132018/http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=195 WhisperToMe (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old URLs
Talk:Sauber C8

message: I have modified this section to include the fact that the C8 won the Nurburgring 1000 kms in 1986. This is much more important than an uncited claim that it had a top speed of 370 km/h. Winning races is much more important. Without a source for this claim, it should be removed. I'll give it the customary two weeks. Flanker235 (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achievements
Talk:Mercedes-Benz C291

message: There are no sources cited for this article at all. Anyone know where the information came from? Flanker235 (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations? 

message: Under the engine section, it compares the output of the engine in the C291 to that of the C11, which is somewhat misleading, as the C11 was designed to meet regulations that were a lot less strict.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.104.100 (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to C11
Talk:24 Hours of Love

message: I remember tuning in briefly and seeing Love locked in a dressing room or something where half her breast was visibly exposed. Was this censored on air or was I hallucinating? --71.156.94.29 09:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited? 