Talk:West Coast Eagles

message: does anybody know an admin or is an admin that can lock this page i have a feeling a few angry fremantle supporters will be editing heavily soon if you catch my drift  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.78.120 (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Locking

message: Does anyone know where i can download the West coast theme song? For free
------------------
(Removed link)
BartBart 14:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any copyright ramifications there? Remy B 12:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme song 

message: Thanks for uploading :Image:2006AFLGrandFinalLogo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:2006AFLGrandFinalLogo.png]]

message: :Image:WestCoast80s.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Resolved by Seth Cohen. CaNNoNFoDDa 17:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WestCoast80s.png

message: :Image:WestCoast80s.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WestCoast80s.png

message: :Image:SydneyDesign.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SydneyDesign.jpg

message: :Image:HawthornDesign.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:HawthornDesign.jpg

message: The image :Image:GeelongDesign.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:GeelongDesign.jpg

message: This article is full of conjecture and speculation, largely in a 'sycophantic fan' tone. I've fixed some but there is plenty left to do. 124.178.141.71 (talk) 14:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix it 

message: Someone should update the Geelong shield logo to the proper 1980s/90s logo, 
(in the 92 and 94 GF boxes)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.63.85 (talk) 16:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geelong 90s shield logo 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:West Coast Eagles Jumper.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I'm bringing this here because it's one of the clubs Mick has been associated with. I'm just seeking a few more views on a discussion underway about an image an editor has proposed for the article. See the article history and the Tak page. HiLo48 (talk) 03:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed [[Mick Malthouse]] picture 

message: Curious to know what is the origins of the design, something I've never been able to understand. Why bright blue and yellow? What do the colours symbolise? Is the yellow inspired by the WA state badge? Are the yellow curved bits on the guernsey meant to resemble wings? As a new club, I'm sure the marketing department has explained these things at some stage ... --Rulesfan (talk) 08:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity 

message: Most AFL club pages have a membership and average attendance table over time. There is very little historical data on this club's popularity. It seems pretty improbable that it could jump from 54,745 to 106,422 in 10 years, that is almost double! And how does this compare to the club's early days in the 1980s for example.--Rulesfan (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership and Attendance