lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Australian rugby league premiers

message: I would have thought Australian rugby league premiers a more appropriate name than champions. Before I clicked on the link that took me here I wasn't sure what would be listed, and was half expecting some kind of international results table. However if it said 'premiers' people would know exactly what kind of list it is.--Jeff79 20:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

message: There has been a lot of talk that the Dragons 2010 premiership was the club's 16th but really they should separate from St. George Dragons tally. Oki choki (talk) 22:08, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.--Jeff79 (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Perhaps a bullet point for Wests Tigers and St George-Illawarra could simply clarify it. To me they're both new clubs, but they share a history. It is the first premiership for "St George-Illawarra".(Mattdocbrown (talk) 10:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dragons

message: If your going to include the Newcastle Knights 1997 ARL Premiership in there total wins......Then the Broncos 1997 SL Win should be added to theirs!
BN420au (talk) 01:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Premiership Totals

message: This page contains a lot of the same information that List of NRL Grand finals contains. I believe we should get rid of the grand final information (i.e stadiums, referees, crowds) and move the minor premiers and wooden spoons section in line with the premiers and runners-up. Your thoughts? WDM10 (talk) 04:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructure the information
Talk:Susan P. Graber

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Susan Graber was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Persian musical instruments

message: hi. there is a new instrument made by shajarian based on the images from an ancient instrument called Sorahi (صراحی). i found the following pages mentioning them. delawaz, mehr news agencies, presstv. it has appeared on stage by shajarian and shahnaz ensemble. Should we add this to the list?--خنیاگر (talk) 12:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sorahi 

message: Why are wind instruments included in the section of Stringed instruments? --91.125.108.249 (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wind instruments 

message: If the title is Iranian musical instruments, why does the first line say Persian musical instruments? If nothing pops up here on the talk page, I'll change it for consistency's sake. wia (talk) 05:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title v. first line 

message: Is there a reason the gheychak (قيچك) is not mentioned in this article? 173.89.236.187 (talk) 15:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gheychak 
Talk:Mapback

message: I've added the category (books by type) and removed the request -- if I've done this wrong, please just revert me.  Accounting4Taste 20:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The one in the illustrations: Rim of the Pit.  Accounting4Taste:talk 03:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Category added
Talk:Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People

message: The Reports:
*
*
are the reports of the "THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE ISRAELI
PRACTICES AFFECTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE POPULATION
OF THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Point by point (talk • contribs) 20:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reports of anoter UN comitee
Talk:Willibrord Society

message: The notability  of this organization is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for organizations, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the Society, or books in which the Society is mentioned. The sources may, but need not, be available online; it is however important that they are explicitely cited.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 20:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are some hits at Google Books showing third-party sources where the Society has been mentioned. Unfortunately, since I'm in Germany, I can't view most of the book previews, so I don't know what these books have to say. I do think the Society is notable enough for inclusion, but I'm not sure how to go about proving it. —Angr 17:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

text: While the various Willibrord Societies are well-enough known to feature, for example, in the Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, and while Bishops of the Anglican and Old Catholic churches play a part in the life of the Society (the Archbishops of Canterbury and of Utrecht are Patrons of the English Willibrord Society), there are no independent reliable sources which convey more than a bare minimum of information about the society. There are references to the Societies' activities in the ecclesiastical press (e.g. Church Times, Christkatholisches Kirchenblatt, but random explicit citations from ephemera are not useful for the majority of readers, surely? HectorDavie (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Reliable, but not independent. To really establish notability, we need to show that the Willibrord Society has been discussed in print by people other than the Anglican and Old Catholic Churches themselves. —Angr 19:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability
Talk:Lowtax

message: shouldnt there be page for lowtax to???? he i smore than just somethingawful.... he is man of self.
This page should be a Disambig page, Richard Kyanka and Byron Looper are both notable, not really sure why Richard does not have a page to himself, as he is notable. - 69.47.132.138 (talk) 02:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Toona sinensis

message: I grew one of these in my yard and it got eaten by a rabbit and died.  But the tree I took the seed from, labeled as this species in the Morris Arboretum, as well as the tree I grew, had terminal leaflets on nearly all the leaves...so is that comment perhaps a bit inaccurate?  Or was I looking at an atypical tree?  Cazort (talk) 20:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I grew one of these in my yard

message: According to US.trade law and several conservation treaties (CITIES being one notable example) only one of the three varieties of the Swietenia family can be called true or genuine mahogany. Please cite your sources to substantiate your claim that T. sinensis is referred to as a true mahogany.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.188.16.208 (talk) 11:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated use of the term true mahogany in refernce to T. Sinensis. 

message: According to US.trade law and several conservation treaties (CITIES being one notable example) only one of the three varieties of the Swietenia family can be called true or genuine mahogany. Please cite your sources to substantiate your claim that T. sinensis is referred to as a true mahogany.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.188.16.208 (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated use of the term true mahogany in refernce to T. Sinensis. 

message: Information about the leaves supposedly tasting like beef should be added to this article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Beef flavor
Talk:Darboux derivative

message: I may be mistaken, but is this really due to Darboux?  I know Cartan studies such things in his Groupes Finis... series.  Of course, the standard of referencing was somewhat lower in those days.  Can anyone track down the original paper?  I tried some time ago, but the trail ended with Cartan. Silly rabbit 20:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: I'm certainly not an expert on this, but it seems like T_g L_g would be a map T_g G \to T_{g^2} G with the definitions given.  Shouldn't there be an inverse in there somewhere? --Dan131m (talk) 02:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Maurer-Cartan Form
Talk:House of Councillors (Morocco)

message: The House is composed now of 120 councillors:
:*24 elected by the 16 regional councils;
:*48 elected by the communal, prefectoral and provincial councils, grouped in 16 regions;
:*20 elected by the 'professional chambers' (agriculture, commerce, industry, services, artisanry, fishery), grouped in 16 regions;
:*8 elected by employers' unions, grouped in 8 regions;
:*20 elected nationally by employees' representatives.
Elections are by list-PR (closed list, simple quota largest remainder); if one seat, by plurality.
See Loi organique n° 28-11 relative à la Chambre des conseillers.--Bancki (talk) 11:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New composition (2011)
Talk:Alabama Cooperative Extension System

message: The history section is HUGE, especially as there's an entire separate article on the history of the Alabama Extension.  Do we really need this much history here?  Or should the two pages be merged? valereee (talk) 16:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The entire 'history of' article is already included in the main article. valereee (talk) 16:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[History of the Alabama Cooperative Extension System]] 
Talk:Darboux frame

message: I think the                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   t                               top row        "(the tangent normal)"                                                                                                                                                                      "                               middle row     "(the unit tangent)"
                                                                                                                                                        "                               bottom row     "(the unit normal)"
               are the correct order of the terms in the "Definition" section.MGilly9 (talk) 09:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Severe weather terminology (Canada)

message: An informative article.  Much appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.98.179 (talk) 04:45, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Issues in Malaysian Education

message: At the moment this article reads like a POV fork of Education in Malaysia. I've opened a discussion about these problematic articles there, and so anyone interested should probably have a look. Johnleemk | Talk 21:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is in fact a badly sourced, badly written POV fork. I intend to have nominate it at AfD in the next day or so. Monkeyassault (talk) 14:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV fork?

message: This paragraph needs some serious referencing (particularly the ones that are in bold):
"Racial quotas, a highly politicised and controversial issue in Malaysia, exist for university admission. In 2002 the government announced a reduction of reliance on racial quotas, instead leaning more towards meritocracy. However, in 2004, 128 students who obtained 5As in the STPM (the best possible grade for university application) were denied their first choice of course which was medicine. This is part of an ongoing issue, where the only thing these students had in common was that they were non-Malay or non-Bumiputra. All students managed to successfully gain offers to private institutions but some did not pursue a medical education due to lack of funds and financial support."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.48.216.197 (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Racial Quotas
Talk:All Saved Freak Band

message: Added and tested 23 internal links, two more external links. This will complete the total revision of the page. --Asfband (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Good job on trying to solve the article issues. A couple of formatting points:
1) The citations are wrongly formatted. I added "Reflist", which will auto fill in the references. Now the citations that were manually entered should be moved to the sentence they prove (after the full stop), inside ref tags. The tags are in most cases already there (they make the superscript numbers in the text), so simply copy and paste in between the Insert footnote text here tags. I already fixed one (number 11) as an example and removed the unreferenced tag.
2)The citations to print material need the page number and publisher.
3) Paragraphs should have only one space between them.
4)I'll remove the "coatrack" tag, as i don't see why it is there, and there is no talk discussion. I alro made overview into the lead, and removed a copy/paste redundancy.
I only read through it quickly, but i think after the citations are fixed, most projects would pass it as a C. Click on the project banners at the top of the talk page to find the assessment pages, if you are interested.Yobmod (talk) 11:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From Requested feedback
Talk:Gila Sher

message: I see no reason for this article to be deleted. It was marked for deletion because Professor Sher was considered a non-noteworthy academic. It seems obvious to me that anyone actually in the field of philosophy of logic knows this to be false. Professor Sher is a respected scholar on two major figures in Analytic Philosophy: Quine and Tarski. Her work on both has proven very influential. She has almost singlehandedly opened an entirely new line of research within Quine scholarship (into Foundational Holism) and she made a name for herself defending Tarski from John Etchemendy in the late 1990's. 
Professor Sher is a published author with three books in philosophy. She is a tenured full professor, a popular lecturer, and she has influenced many students. The Leiter Report, which evaluates philosophy departments in the United States, has noted her prescence at UCSD as strengthening the schools general reputation. She also has worked with Linksy and Zalta, two major figures in modern modal logic.
Professor Sher is a significant, important researcher. This article should stay.
Aedan Kane 21:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Del 

message: ...not everyone has heard of her! You can't just say 'it's obvious she's notable'. You have to prove that she is by citing good, independent secondary sources (eg newspapers or academic journals that mention her). Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 21:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It may be obvious to you but... 

message: I've removed the 'references needed' tag because I think there are sufficient references here now for a short article - and to recognise Aedan Kane's good work in improving this article. I've put in 'citation needed' tags at points in the article itself, which will need an in-line citation adding. The references section at the end needs to be Harvard-style (Author, title, date, city, publisher) rather than a list of URLs. The way to do this is like in the article on Jerry Fodor, which has in-line citations in the text linked to the full references at the end. If you go to the Fodor article and try to edit it, you will see what the syntax looks like.
I've also added the 'Philosopher' box from the Fodor page, but don't know what to put in it! I'm sure Aedan can fill it out authoritatively. I'll also find some categories to add this article to. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 09:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs tag removed
Talk:All-African Peoples Revolutionary Party

message: Okay, the A-APRP homepage disappeared literally as I was revising this ( http://members.aol.com/aaprp/index2.html ), and since that's the main source for most of the information, I'm not sure this page can be made verifiable.  I'm not putting it up for deletion yet, but... I dunno. --Jetamors 21:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 18:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: The group's official page calls it the All-African People's Revolutionary Party
http://www.aaprp-intl.org/
Can we stop the redirect and move the text?Chip.berlet (talk) 19:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore Proper Name
Talk:Breast cancer chemotherapy

message: I will be working on this article as part of my course. Here is a bibliography of possible sources I will be using to add to this article:
* These are mostly guidelines or position statements from national or international expert bodies:
* https://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/guide/treatment-chemotherapy#1
* http://www.nationalbreastcancer.org/breast-cancer-chemotherapy
* https://www.breastcancercare.org.uk/information-support/facing-breast-cancer/going-through-treatment-breast-cancer/chemotherapy
* https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/chemotherapy-for-breast-cancer.html
* http://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/chemotherapy
* Book which I'd be able to access/ get through the Yale library:
* Breast cancer : suggested protocol guidelines for combination chemotherapy trials and for combined modality trials
--Seahorse17 (talk) 03:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
MediaWiki talk:Lag-warn-high

message: Due to high database server lag, changes newer than  might not be shown in this list.
Due to high database server lag, changes newer than  might not be shown in this list.
→AzaToth 21:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That probably won't work in the MediaWiki namespace. Anyway, I think keeping it with seconds is fine. —Centrx→talk • 21:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it works on other MW messages, I assumed it works here too. →AzaToth 21:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think it will work, though you could just go ahead and test it (nobody will die if the message is broken a few seconds). A long-standing bug prevents the value of "$1" from being passed to a ParserFunction in most (or all?) interface messages. This can be fixed by creating a template which already contains the value; for example, see Template:MediaWiki direct link (documentation). —{admin} Pathoschild 21:16:47, 01 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible change? 

message: I understand that lag is ridiculously high at the moment, and that a special message may be warranted, but could the number $1 somehow still be included, unless there is a very important technical reason to not do so? Thanks, GracenotesT § 02:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that Naconkantari did the above two minutes prior to my request. Never mind. GracenotesT § 02:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Include number
Template talk:Orkney Islands

message: This is a bold and commendable attempt at a new template, but it needs some formatting work to avoid being cumbersome. See for example Template:Hebrides for a more user-friendly format. Ben MacDui (Talk) 21:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I do not understand, Ben MacDui.I cannot see much difference between the Template:Hebrides and this one, now you have edited it. Why is it cumbersome? And why did you get rid of my places of intrest and airports.
Zugspitze 16:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do you mean 

message: As I understand it, there have only ever been two towns in the islands. Balfour, Houton, Longhope and Lyness are just a subset of the many villages.  I've changed the title but I think this template would be better without this section. Any views?--JBellis 10:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Towns

message: I wonder if it would be worth adding a sports section to the template to cover topics such as 
Orkney F.C. and the Orkney Amateur Football Association? Dunarc (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. Done. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 20:18, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Dunarc (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sport
Talk:Institute of Transportation Studies

message: This material is taken from the Web site of the Institute of Transportation Studies. While all material is copyright UC Regents, the educational and research nature of the Institute's mission permit reuse for non-commercial or education uses. Since none of the material is presented as coming from anywhere else, posting it verbatim on Wikipedia would seem permissible. As Webmaster at the Institute, I can attest to the legitmacy of the entry and the value in not having to rewrite all this material in the itnerest of making this online resource more broadly available. If rewriting is required, this entry will have to wait, as I have other deadline projects for the next while. Thanks.
::This is not acceptable, and the Material must be deleted. WP articles are available under the GFDL license for commercial as well as noncommercial use, and there is no possible way of retaining noncommercial use only material. What I did was stubbified the page,reducing it to its header, as the institute is clearly notable. DGG 00:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed some duplicative links, and am checking again to see that you have removed the Copyright violations. I call to your attention WP:COI, and WP:BFAQ. DGG (talk) 07:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest writing an article on the university institute instead of the individual campus one. More likely to be considered notable. DGG (talk) 06:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: of article for one of the fivisions of the center , the Technology transfer program, not independently notable--and no third party sources DGG (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: suggested merge