Talk:Polish National Catholic Church

message: I would like to hear from someone more knowledgeable than myself about how this group has been affected by the elevation of a Polish Cardinal to the papacy over twenty-five years ago and whether patriotic loyalities and considerations have trumped any theological ones.
:This needs to be rewritten by (someone who is very close to/knowledgeable about the situation) so it no longer starts with a discussion of what the church no longer is but rather what it is now and get into history later in to the article.  Rlquall 14:15, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Effects of John Paul II's papacy

message: The following unsinged comments were placed on the article page itself, instead of on the talk page.  They were posted by User:64.12.116.13.  I moved them here.  --Briancua 22:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments in wrong place

message: An unsigned-on user has deleted much of the history of the PNCC, most all of it well-documented from a very respected source (Frank S. Mead's Handbook of Denominations).  Why delete info about the church's origins, i.e. why these Catholics pulled out from the Roman Catholic Church?  This is critical to the PNCC's identity.  Why delete the fact that clergy are married, and that masses were conducted in the vernacular?  Unless there's a valid reason for deleting this history, I'm going to add it back.  Timotheos 20:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is History being deleted?

message: Pope John Paul II reopened communication with the PNCC, so they are no longer excommunicated 75.75.134.85 16:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  excommunication 

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups such as the Polish National Catholic Church have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal ordinariate

message: "In 2009 the Church had some 25,000 members in the United States (although a recent census of the PNCC shows less than 10,000)".
When was the recent census? Where is the documentation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.241.154.121 (talk) 08:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership 

message: Article says:
:Private confession is required for all members under the age of sixteen, while public confession is a part of every Mass.
Surely that should read over not under! It seems completely back to front as written! (I don't actually know PNCC's practices, but the inverse would be broadly consistent with what other churches, including the RCC, do, while the way it is written it sounds like a bit of a peculiar practice.) 60.225.114.230 (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it looks very dubious. I can find nothing about it on their own website. I have cn-tagged it. If no citation is forthcoming I suggest deletion. Vilĉjo (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks dubious but the article does go on to say that adults may avail themselves of private confession if they wish.  What is the public confession? Is it different from the Confiteor?174.117.133.103 (talk) 22:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in article 

message: Is there any church that doesn't?  --174.117.133.103 (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The PNCC permits divorced people to participate fully in the Mass"