lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hungary and the euro

message: Please discuss at Talk:Euro#Contradiction. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: There are exactly 2 unsourced statements about the topic that the title suggests:
* Hungarian euro coins have not yet been designed.
* Current plans indicate the design of the national side is to be designed in 2007
All the rest is about Hungary meeting the EMU requirements.
-- nyenyec ☎ 18:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost none of the current text is about the coins 

message: Hi, there's a discussion currently ongoing about the potential renaming or merge/redirecting of this and other articles at Talk:United Kingdom euro coins#Crystal Balls that you may want to look at.  I suggest that further discussion remain there.  Thanks. Pfainuk talk 12:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at United Kingdom Euro Coins

message: A table for the requirements would be appropriate. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maastricht Requirement Table, please
Talk:Robert Lowry (hymn writer)

message: Robert Lowry, born 1826, died in 1899 is the composer of over 500 hymns.  Robert Wadsworth Lowry is an entirely different person who was born after 1900 and had nothing to do with being a poet, hymn writer, of the works mentioned.  I am Robert Lowry's great granddaughter.  How Robert Wadworth Lowry came to be credited, I don't know.  However, you need to change the name to simply Robert Lowry.  Thank you very much.  My email address is: jhls30@aol.com
I believe that "Beautiful River" is actually the same song as "Shall We Gather." So there is no need for them to be credited separately here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmthieme (talk • contribs) 23:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of social nudity organizations

message: Keep in mind Wikipedia is not mere collections of external links or internet directories.  You might wish to add more information about each of these groups so it doesn't fall afoul of that. Schizombie 20:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This article was moved from a NPOV article Clothes free organizations title to a POV article title)Dandelion1 00:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But why does that make you want to delete it? Is the content suddenly worthless by having a different title? Kusma (討論) 01:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I wanted to restore the orginal Clothes free people article before this article was created with a NPOV title. I'm very sorry if I did not follow correct procedure. Are you an admin? Can you help with this dispute? Dandelion1 01:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you just move the article back to the "neutral" title and ask the other person on his/her talk page? (I'm not using your talk page right now because it redirects somewhere, which I find odd). IS there anybody else involved or is it just you and Cyndiann? You have used the move function in March, so you know how it works. Kusma (討論) 01:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised you would ask. All the old pages now have a history on them and title, so a simple move would not work. Cheers! Dandelion1 01:31, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Er... they were redirects without history until you started editing them. A simple move would have worked. I will now restore this one at Clothes free organizations. Please stop cutting and pasting! Kusma (討論) 01:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Dandelion1 01:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 
speedy deletion
Talk:Los Ríos Region

message: I removed the following section because it it extremely unclear:
Apart from the general Chilean economic crisis, German capitals were frozen after pressure from the USA and their products were boycotted outside Chile.
Are we talking about German capital, as in investment money, or are we talking about cities in Chile with people of Germanic origin?
What references do we have to document the fact that the USA put on pressure, and where were products boycotted?  Whose products were boycotted, Chilean products, products produced by Germanic people?  Where were these boycotts implemented?  My only recollection of boycotts is a New Zealand boycott of Chilean products in the 1990's -- if this is the case, it might be useful to specify how this affected Valdivia specifically.
JAXHERE | Talk 12:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have also haed about "frozen german capital" (capital=money) by several persons but I have never asked for sources. when I got soyurces i will write about it in the Valdivia article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dentren (talk • contribs) 18:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Disposition

message: Jon Awbrey 21:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes & Queries

message: I made the terrible mistake of confusing my browser windows and I edited (translated) this article in macedonian, which was supposed to go on the Macedonian Wiki. Therefore I would like someone to revert the chages ASAP. My apologies and many thanks. --B. Jankuloski 01:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: What do you think about moving this page to Disposition (philosophy), and making Disposition redirect to the disambiguation page? Mdotley 22:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 

message: i think this spot should be changed to a catagory (ie list of differnt dispositions)
RD99 23:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: change of type 

message: — Assignment last updated by Icecream209 (talk) 07:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writ 2 - Academic Writing
Talk:Jenny Kwan

message: Just a note re: Samaritan's edit: "(community legal counsel -> community legal worker as she was not an attorney)", the BC Government bio page uses the title "community advocate", which might be more appropriate instead of "worker".  Minor distinction in any case.  Southsloper 21:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Italian film score composers

message: I cannot do it (I don't know why), but if anyone can: Please incude to this category Nino Rota!!!! Obligatory!!!! He deserves it more than anyone else and has already his own site in English Wikipedia.
I am the user and contributor of Polish Wikipedia, so that is maybe the reason that I cannot change anything in English Wikipedia (especially in the sites "cathegory"). Anyway - plese help me with Nino Rota, the undennied musical angel of Federico Fellini. (Sorry for my poor English)
--Guliwer52 21:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:U.S. Route 30 in Pennsylvania

message: It's confusing for a US30 article to refer to the road frequently as Lincoln Highway.  Yes the Lincoln Highway needs to be mentioned, but sentences shouldn't start with it.  The worst bit is "The Lincoln Highway came into the Pittsburgh area along the old Pittsburgh and Greensburg Turnpike (now U.S. Route 30)...".--J Clear 20:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I never finished the changeover. --SPUI (T - C) 07:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schizoid Article? 

message: PA Route 1 (1920s) redirects here, but the text doesn't mention that at all.  Just one graphic of the sign.--J Clear 20:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PA Route 1 

message: I think Rt. 30 goes through Paradise Township, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, but this is not mentioned in the chart in the article.  It certainly goes through the towns of Paradise, Vintage, and Kinzers, which I think are in Paradise Township, but I am not sure exactly where the township line lies. Jstuby (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Paradise, Leaman Place, Williamstown, and Kinzer are all in Paradise Township on Rt. 30.  See this map. Jstuby (talk) 20:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it does pass through Paradise Township.  However, it does not intersect another state highway, so we don't mention it in the junction list.  If we included every township and community that a highway passes through regardless of intersections, the junction list would be far too long to be of any use to our readers. –Fredddie™ 22:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't understand that about the table.  No problem. Jstuby (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paradise Township 

message: this is the part where you provide the direct support for the given text that you found in the sources before removing the CN tags. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced parts 

message: those failed verification for me, where are you seeing the claims in the source? Particularly the claims about forests, suburbs, etc? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed verification claim
Talk:11th Aviation Group (United States)

message: On the subject of the 11th Aviation Regiment, the US Army Center of Military History has the following to say:
" Note: Although the unit is frequently referred to as the 11th Aviation Regiment, it is actually organized under the TOE for an avaition group and its official designation is HHC, 11th Aviation Group ".SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 05:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  11th Aviation Regiment 

message: Is "The unit was deactivated by casing its colours " clear?  I'd link to soemthing on the tradition of casing colours if I knew where.  (Since this is a US military article should that be colors or colours?) RJFJR 17:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, a little more than 10 years and you finally have it  ...here it is, Casing of the Colors...hot out of the oven and made fresh today. — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casing colours
Talk:Albany (London)

message: Is the definite article actually used?  Properly, surely, it is just Albany.
:Question settled and article updated using [] Mark Nesbitt 11:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the most creepily worded document I have ever read Stikko (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The article

message: Surely Dornford Yates' referring to "Albany" is an infallible indication of how phoney, unsmart, and non-U the usage is. Stikko (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dornford Yates 

message: How about adding a list of fictional tenants, with reference to the work they appear in ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolgiati (talk • contribs) 16:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional tenants ?
Talk:1972 Five Nations Championship

message: The IRA has a stated policy of not bombing in either Scotland or Ireland... so this story sounds a wee bit fishy. Someone out there may well have been stirring. --MacRusgail 21:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Whopper

message: Whopper logo 2021.svg 47.53.118.177 (talk) 11:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add logo 

message: The whopper is the best burger made by burger king a fast food company. HeckerPlaysYT (talk) 22:45, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 04:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 August 2023 

message: 105.103.195.217 (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . Please, no vandalism. gobonobo + c 20:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 October 2023 

message: Burger King in South Korea has stated that they are discontinuing the Whopper, with its last sales in 14 April 2024
The story is still developing as there are concerns that it is yet another marketing ploy, but as it stands today, it is on their offical website and is reported in one news article posted a bit more than an hour ago.
Could this be added in either the "history" section or the "discontinued variants" section as "Discontinuing in South Korea" subsection? BrakeCoach (talk) 01:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 April 2024
Talk:Dune (1984 soundtrack)

message: Toto album?
I think this is more of a soundtrack and does not belong in the Toto discography  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.137.32 (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Toto album

message: I was watching the "Stockholm Syndrome" segment on the Daily Show for April 21-22 and they played a song in the opening that has nearly (if not) the same melody as the Dune Main Theme.  However, based on the arrangement I am pretty sure it's not from the movie.  Does anyone know what this song is?  I'm pretty sure Toto used it to derive the Main Theme.
This isn't that uncommon for movie soundtracks, see Willow and Robert Schumann's 3rd Symphony.
--122.26.114.136 (talk) 01:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The origin of the Dune main theme 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Dune (1984 soundtrack). There is a consensus to move to the alternate proposed title.  – robertsky (talk) 02:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Dune (soundtrack) →  – WP:NATURALDAB -- use the title found on the album cover for this 1984 album. There being the subtopic Dune (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) located at the other article for the 2021 film. The current title should be an index for all the soundtracks for the Dune franchise, there being these two, Dune: Part Two (soundtrack) 2024 album, and the other two 2021 soundtrack albums The Art and Soul of Dune and The Dune Sketchbook -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 March 2024 

message: An editor has requested that :Dune (Dune album) be moved to :Dune (1995 album, which may be of interest to editors of this page. You  are invited to participate in the move discussion. -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 23:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Related move request
Talk:Bridging the Gap (Black Eyed Peas album)

message: This article, along with numerous others, including several BEPs' songs and albums, has bee subject to substantial edit warring and sock puppetry. De facto banned editor  is the problem. Yes, a hidden note directs editors to discussion on the talk page. There is no discussion on the talk page.
:
Per WP:V, I am adding verifiably sourced genre info, based on existing sources. Undiscussed changes without reliable sources will be reverted. If you feel any of the sources are not fairly represented, feel free to discuss it here. If you feel any of the sources are not reliable, feel free to discuss it here. If you just really, really, really want to make sure we list the BEPs music as fitting your POV, feel free to discuss it here (and good luck with that). - SummerPhDv2.0 15:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:The Church Lady

message: How about the time he/she got nailed by Sean Penn? --D-Day  My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes 21:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sean Penn 

message: Stop changing the reference to Church Lady's "Superior Dance" to "Superiority Dance."  It was never called that, and I don't understand why so many people believe that to be the correct name.  Read this transcript: . Wavy G 21:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Superior Dance"

message: The catchphrases need redone.  They should read like this:
Most Common Catchphrases
1.  Well isn't that special? and/or Well isn't that extra special?
2.  Apparently Mr. Mouth is moving, but we have no idea what we're saying do we?
3.  Billy, can I have my special shaft of light?
4.  .....who was it, who could it possibly?  Was it, oh I don't know:  SATAN?
5.  When trouble erupts and power corrupts, i'm sure you'll all agree that i'm just a little bit superior to all of Thee, HIT IT PEARL!
6.  Well how conveeeenient!
2001:558:6001:13:571:7AC8:3C7:8DAD (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Andy W. (talk) 18:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2016
Talk:Elegance

message: They call this a stub, but I think it's nicely done.  It would be hard to expand on this without making it a laundry list of things that touch on Elegance but are not elegance in and of themselves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.33.48 (talk) 23:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nicely done

message: Quote, in section: General concept: Different applications of the term are not fully isomorphic in the sense described by Douglas Hofstadter as follows: “The word ‘isomorphism’ applies when two complex structures can be mapped onto each other,...  There are ten different meanings given for isomorphism, this specific, (often) contradictory one is likely to induce confusion in those who 1) use a different definition, or 2) are utterly unfamiliar with that jargon.  It's distracting, and may read like gibberish.  ...and it's extraneous, not needed, inelegant. While this might have relevance below, it hardly belongs under General concept.  --69.110.89.115 (talk) 12:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  isomorphism???   

message: In my opinion, the addition in this edit, while referenced, is too close to the source. I've removed it. If someone feels the concept is worth including, please feel free, but ensure it is in your own words. possible source--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright review. 

message: (Edited to show thumbnail of image off to the side.)
It's an old sport to make up proofs of non-conservation of area by showing two assemblies where some quantity is not actually conserved, because one of the diagrams misleads. 
It you apply that skeptical eye to this diagram (which is correct), the long side of E has to equal the blunt side of A in the large square, because these sides are glued together in the medium square. 
Unfortunately, in this critical respect, the supplied diagram is a few pixels off true, which—when combined with a possible visual illusion—really doesn't make this appear visually true of the large square (that a line constructed on the large square between exterior points AD and AECE is parallel to the long side of triangle B). — MaxEnt 16:39, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram slightly suspect
Talk:Lowry Mays

message: The bottom box contains the name Randall Rays as a corporate officer.  This is incorrect.  It should read "Randall Mays".  The correct information is contained in the article on Clear Channel.  I don't know how to edit that box. Magicwombat 21:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was corrected. - Ianneub 02:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Still (Joy Division album)

message: Can anybody expand on this? Why only some vinyl? Why not on CD? Which vinyl releases is it on? BTLizard 09:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twenty Four Hours 

message: There is a third version of Ceremony also...apparently it was recorded at Graveyard Studios in Prestwich, but it could possibly have been a rehearsal tape as mentioned in iancurtis.org 118.208.216.144 (talk) 04:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceremony 

message: The track numbering is re-started across the LP break, but the section afterwards refers to track numbers without a side reference. You can work some of it out by deduction, but it could be a lot clearer. -- Jon Dowland 12:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track breakdown 

message: The copy of the LP that I have is packaged as a cloth bound gate-fold sleeve with a white ribbon round the fold.  Were all copies released in this package, or have I got some kind of rarity?
And if it's a rarity, should the packaging be mentioned in the article?  Astronaut (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. The original Italian release from 1981 was clothbound with black labels, so that's what you (most likely) bought. Yintan  08:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited edition LP?
Talk:Meadowbank Thistle F.C.

message: I'm proposing that the articles on Livingston's former identities as Ferranti and Meadowbank be merged into that on their current incarnation. I know that separate articles exist for Wimbledon / MK Dons / AFC Wimbledon, but that's a different scenario due to the creation of a "breakaway" club and the dispute over who can claim Wimbledon's history and honours etc.  In this case, there's no such argument to consider. Meadowbank quite clearly became Livingston, whether you agree with the morality of what happened - I personally don't - and there was no "AFC Meadowbank" left behind. As far as I'm aware, a number of the Meadowbank fans ended up watching Edinburgh City who now play at Meadowbank Stadium, but this was a pre-existing club which merely took over the tenancy.
Livingston F.C. continue to give 1974 as their year of foundation. It should be noted that on becoming Livi they inherited Meadowbank's league place - they were never elected to the Scottish League as Livingston. Also, they initially played at Meadowbank under the new name before Almondvale was ready, as well as inheriting Thistle's players, management and colours.
In turn, Meadowbank were pretty much a direct continuation of Ferranti Thistle, despite the slightly perverse 1974 foundation date. Althought that year marked a change of name and ground, this was a result of Ferranti being elected to the Scottish League, and not a precursor to it.
Finally, I've noticed that on Wikipedia pages (Sports franchising - CC) on American sports teams, where franchising of this sort is of course common, standard practice seems to be to have only one page, even for teams that have migrated across thousands of miles, e.g. the Brooklyn / L.A. Dodgers Jellyman 21:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There was the Mother of All Battles at Milton Keynes Dons F.C. when it was a single article covering Wimbledon F.C. and MK Dons all in one article.  The only way to prevent perpetual vandalism was to have two separate articles.  I don't really agree that the existence of AFC was the cause of that - both were outcomes of the move.  The MK Dons page gives two foundation dates.  See Talk:Milton Keynes Dons F.C.#Separate pages idea etc etc etc.  Your call, but I wouldn't advise it. --Concrete Cowboy 18:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the merge tag now following the lukewarm response received! See :Talk:Livingston F.C. for details. -- Jellyman 18:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)