lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ines Uusmann

message: See: https://www.svd.se/internet-en-fluga--var-det-en-groda-ines-uusmann  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.89.95.230 (talk) 05:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  She was not misquoted, editing to say that is vandalism
Talk:Civilis (vicarius)

message: I propose that Civilis (vicarius) be merged into Great Conspiracy. All of the information that exists about him comes indirectly from Ammianus' account, no source I have found features him as its sole topic (thus possibly making him non-notable for the purposes of Wikipedia), and it also seems he is only important for his role in ending the Great Conspiracy.  DeemDeem52 (talk) 14:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Draper Kauffman

message: Source for this article is the official USS Navy bio of Draper held by the Naval Historical Center.Johnfmh 19:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: i don't have a citation for this, but i knew admiral kauffman and i'm almost certain he was a lcdr. when he established the udt teams.Toyokuni3 (talk) 16:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank history 
Category talk:Massachusetts politician stubs

message: I notice that there's also a category for Mass politicians.   Would it be appropriate to add this category as a subcat?   I think every Mass politician with a stub is by definition a Mass politician.   But perhaps there's some internal MediaWiki nuance I don't know about.   thx, PhilipR 19:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass politician cat
Talk:Ingram Stainback

message: Removed Find a Grave as a reference and placed in external links. Consensus has determined that Find a Grave is an unreliable source by one or more of the following;
*1)-WP:SOURCES; Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
*2)- WP:NOTRELIABLE; Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight.
*3)- WP:SELFPUBLISH; Find a Grave is user edited and uses anonymous or pseudonymous editors.
*4)- WP:SPS; This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database, Cracked.com, CBDB.com, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users. Find a Grave is not currently specifically named as is IMBd but falls under "and so forth". Rational dictates that Find a Grave, while not specifically listed by name in WP:SPS, certainly falls under the criteria. Otr500 (talk) 23:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it I who added the find-a-grave in the first place, but agree that it is self-published so not a very reliable source. Putting it in the external links section sounds like the reasonable solution. There are some mistaes in their entries, so generally I like to just use them to start research, not as the citation source. Now in this case, User:Joel Bradshaw took the photo at the cemetery, so in some way that could be a "verification" that to me is more reliable than the find-a-grave, although perhaps some would argue as "original" research. Sigh. W Nowicki (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This article was revered with no discussion on the talk page but that it is otherwise fine as is. There are three other references so the articles is not in danger of being nominated for an AFD. The reversion was against long-standing consensus and one or more of the above listed policies and guidelines.
I am asking the editor that made the reversion to self-revert that will place Find a Grave in a presently acceptable location under "external links". Otr500 (talk) 07:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it I who added the find-a-grave in the first place, but agree that it is self-published so not a very reliable source. Putting it in the external links section sounds like the reasonable solution. There are some mistaes in their entries, so generally I like to just use them to start research, not as the citation source. Now in this case, User:Joel Bradshaw took the photo at the cemetery, so in some way that could be a "verification" that to me is more reliable than the find-a-grave, although perhaps some would argue as "original" research. Sigh. W Nowicki (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of above actions
Talk:List of World War II military equipment of Poland

message: lots of mistakes in River Fleet.
for example armament of monitors
SHOLD BE:
Warszawa (Warsaw), Horodyszcze, Pińsk, Toruń
* since 1920 - 105 mm (5 cm) Cannons (2xI),5 MG
* since 1930 - 100 mm howitzer, 75 mm Cannons (2xI), 4 MG
* since 1938 - 75 mm Guns (1xII and 1xI), 4 MG
Supermatthew 19:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISTAKES 

message: # What is purpose of this list?
# Why there is no external links, references or even no internal links?
# Why there is so much mess, like list of early 1920s aircraft when this should be list of 1939-1945 equipment?
Piotr Mikołajski 19:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Few questions

message: Lack of sourcing and several mistakes:
Polish army didn't used Mosin-Nagant Rifle but Kbk. wz.91/98/26 which used 7.92mm ammo
Springfield, Garand, and M1 Carbine wasn't issued to polish troops on the West, they were equipped by British forces
French weaponry is a total mess, there's no proof that polish troops received semi-automatic weapon. Also lack of FM24/29, MAS-36, Hotchkiss gun and Ruby Pistol.
Soviet weaponry for forces on the East. PPD 34/38 wasn't used by Polish troops. PPD 40 could be used but it's not confirmed and needs citation. Lack of DP-27 and SVT-40. WWIIEnjoyer (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several problems with this list 

message: This list to justify it's own existence needs sourcing and references. Without it will be vandalized.
State of this list is very poor WWIIEnjoyer (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of proper sourcing and references
Talk:UCD GAA

message: We are missing a hurling year we only have 7 table says 8 (Gnevin 21:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 of 8  

message: I think it pretty close i used this image  change if you dont agree (Gnevin 23:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kit 

message: they have won 2 all irelands in football  they must of won at least 2 leinsters (Gnevin 00:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surely if ... 
Talk:Ion G. Duca

message: Someone is deleting facts that I added. I have read a lot of books about Romanian politicians and it is a fact that this man was murderd as a form of revenge act by Iron Guard fascists. I think a fascist is trying to defend it or something by shortening down facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.90.243 (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do see WP:NPOV, WP:WEASEL and WP:PEACOCK. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Facts deleted

message: "His son, George, edited Duca and George's memoirs while at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in the 1970s and 1980s." This isn't clear, at least, not to me. The relevant fact for this article would be that the son edited the father's memoirs (which were already mentioned in the previous sentence). If the writer intended to add that the son also edited his own memoirs, it didn't fit well into the sentence and isn't relevant to this article, which is about the father. So I'd write "His son, George, edited these memoirs while at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in the 1970s and 1980s." Would that be correct and clear? Andrew Dalby 19:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Last sentence
Talk:Ion Gigurtu

message: * France at that time was already defeated and broken. Great Britain was in a difficult position and could do nothing in continental Europe. In fact Great Britain was deaf when Poland first and Romania second asked for support because of Soviet aggression.--Deguef (talk) 16:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Break with France and Great Britain?
Talk:Niagara, Niagara

message: *Entertainment Weekly review
*A Conversation with Bob Gosse and Robin Tunney from Niagara, Niagara--for use with this article--J.D. (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles
Talk:Ira J. McDonald

message: This article has been written and edited using the recommendations at Style guidelines for biographies of California public officials. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Style guidelines for Los Angeles City Council biographies

message: There is no requirement for full birth and death dates in the lede, nor for a portrait to be placed in any particular position. My personal preference is for simple years and for the photo to be placed looking into the article. Since that it the way the article was written and designed, and with no countervailing policy or guideline to counter it, one should not change the intent of the original editor. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full dates in lede. Position of photo.
Talk:Sgùrr Dearg

message: To quote an anon editor's edit summary:
:altered intro text as sgurr dearg is not the only hill in britain which requires rock climbing to reach the summit. It is, however, the only Munro with this distinction.
As far as I can remember, the only other 'hills' requiring rock climbing to reach the summit, in GB at least, are Stac Lee and Stac an Armin off Boreray - which wouldn't be classed as hills at all, let alone mountains, if they weren't on the list of Marilyns - and minor summits like Pillar Rock which also don't count as bona fide mountain tops. I don't know about Ireland but don't imagine it's any different. I've therefore reinstated the basic claim with a qualification, as I think it's true enough to be mentioned. But if I've forgotten a genuine one then please correct! --Blisco 19:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cobbler requires climbing at moderate at least to reach the true summit. Thanks --Mehmet Karatay 12:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other mountains requiring rock climbing?

message: Is the Innaccessible Pinnacle the only summit in the British Isles requiring rock climbing skills? There's a reference here  that says it is, but are there any other views? MidnightBlue (Talk) 20:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We could properly discuss this at the Task Force?  For example, commercial websites aren't usually great references - most of the time they cut and paste their text from Wikipedia (becomming a circular reference) or they don't accredit and sources and the author is unknown (as in this case).  --HighKing (talk) 21:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is clearly not the only summit in the British Isles requiring rock-climbing skills, if you include (e.g.) the Old Man of Hoy as a summit. It must depend on the definition of "summit", which I guess is why the article at present plays safe and says "the only Munro."  SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 21:59, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only summit in British Isles requiring rock climbing skills to reach the top ?
Talk:Ira Ruskin

message: I just started to work on this article.  Please explain the Stub?TalkAbout 19:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Ali Abdel Raziq

message: Someone tagged this article but failed to follow up on the talk page with any specific issues.  The writing of the previous article included a long essay section, which while the content looks reasonable, has a very POV tone and has no inline citations (although references were provided). 
I've re-written the biography, lede, and wrote a short summary of his major work, with multiple inline citations from reputable scholars for each statement. I've tried to work in references to the major critiques/misunderstandings of his work : that he was a total secularist, that he was writing about Salafi or Islamist politics, or that he was a lacky of Western imperial rule. The previous essay I've cordoned off into its own section, as it seems the general thrust is a mainstream and accepted interpretation.  
I'm removing the "Neutrality" tag as this seems excessive -- the language is not neutral but the interpretation of his work is (as much as is possible for a controversial figure). 
I might note that I see -- especially in French sources -- his name is often transliterated as Ali Abdelraziq.
T L Miles (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute tags
Talk:The Power (1968 film)

message: I removed his identity from the "PLOT" on the main page as the film is a mystery film and his identity is deliberately not revealed till the final minutes of the 108 minute film. Knowing it from the start might spoil the film for some.(84.236.152.71 (talk) 12:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Adam Hart's identity
Talk:Claude A. Watson

message: The source of this Wikipedia entry is "Temperance Movemnt Groups and Leaders in the U.S.," from which the material in bold was taken. Omission of this source reference has now been corrected.David Justin 19:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Irene Parlby

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 06:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I've added a "citation needed" to the term "Valiant Five".  I've only seen this term used in the article on the Famous Five and the individual articles about each of the five women.  I've spent some time googling around and not found it anywhere else.  Does anyone have any citations to show the term "Valiant Five" is or ever has been used to refer to them?Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Valiant Five" ?
Talk:Claude Bouthillier

message: Claude Le Bouthillier in Marcel Marion, Dictionnaire des Institutionsde France aux XVIIIe et XVIIIe Siècles (Paris) 1968. --Wetman 15:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Irma Anderson

message: *
:Northamerica1000(talk) 06:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Find sources

message: What do you mean it couldn't be verified that she was the first black woman to hold the mayoral post of a major Californian city? That's easily verifiable.  FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The SFGate reference states, "Anderson, 70, says she is the first African American woman to be elected mayor of a major California city, although a researcher at the California League of Cities said there were no records to confirm or refute that claim."  Unscintillating (talk) 02:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the 2010 census, Compton had population 96,000 and Richmond had population 103,000.  According to the Compton, California article, "[I]n 1973, Doris A. Davis defeated Dollarhide's bid for re-election to become the first African-American female mayor of a metropolitan city in the United States."  This begs the question, how big is a "major" city.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First
Talk:Los Posadas

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  JubalHarshaw 19:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I believe the best name for this article is "Posadas" and that this page should be kept as a redirect. It seems to me that much of the information on this page is to localized. In the U.S. and most larger Latin American cities there is no need for inter-village cooperation. Discussion of village cooperation seems to be of specialized anthropological interest only. 
The section on "German studies" also seems out of place. --Droll 10:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and notes on proposed changes 

message: See the comment above. Also in Spanish the article name is not grammatical as "los" is a masculine article and "posadas" is feminine noun.  The correct phrase is "Las Posadas". --Droll 07:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this should be a redirect
Talk:Claude Ryan

message: My question is, why would we mention in the article about a person what were the bad things that people said about him/her if indeed, this was just a passing mention and does't interest the people coming on this page to get broad biographical information.  Shouldn't details such as «this journalist said this and that insulting comment about him/her» be saved for the people reading the complete biography of the man or the woman? Aren't there more important things that we should know about the famous personality?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.122.132.234 (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that so important to mention this? 
Talk:Isaac Butt

message: Butt falls under the WikiProject as an Irish Nationalist. "Welcome to the Irish Republicanism WikiProject, a collaboration of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Irish republicanism, Irish nationalism, and related organizations, peoples, and other topics". Finnegas (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish Nationalist

message: I was looking at this due to Butt being the first chairman of the :Cork and Youghal Railway.  However I note claim added at  amd think it probably needs a source.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing required
Talk:Lavarand

message: This article is about lavarand, whereas the link is to the LavaRnd site.  See this page for the reasons why this is inaccurate.  I am removing the link.  Alex Dodge 19:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have removed the word 'truly', because it is debatable at best. Nath 19:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussion

message: Is the source available anywhere, and did it use IndyCams?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.91.78 (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 
Talk:Isaac Ellmaker Hiester

message: The references to his opinions on slavery are cryptic, though apparently significant since they cost him an election.  It would improve the quality of the article to have a statement of what they were. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinions on slavery
Talk:Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side-Effect Rating Scale

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!   JubalHarshaw 19:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clément-Charles Sabrevois de Bleury

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from the corresponding article at the Dictionary of Canadian Biography online, which is not compatibly licensed. See their terms of use. Infringing material has been removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Alexander Gogel

message: Maybe I'm nitpicking here, but if there is any information regarding the subject's life prior to age 16, it would certainly be relevant. I'm making a possibly ill-informed judgement that there might be, and that's the primary reason I'm withholding "B" class, as without it the article is still incomplete. If that information isn't really available, please indicate as much. Also, the lead section could be expanded to say a bit more about the subject. John Carter (talk) 00:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As requested I put in a little bit more in the leading section. I don't think this is the place to repeat everything about the Patriot revolution of 1787 and the Batavian one of 1795, however. That is what the wikilinks are there for). Put in his publications and decorations also. I hope this is sufficent?:-)--Ereunetes (talk) 21:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Sweet 15th Diamond

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!   JubalHarshaw 19:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

message: As it stands, this is just one album, with no particular evidence of notability, by an artist who herself appears to be notable by notability (music) criterion 5 (multiple albums on a major label) but whose article is light on details. However, I'm not sure where I would put the track listing in the artist's article... or does that even belong in the encyclopedia?
If this article is kept, I think it would make sense to indicate which prior album each track came from. Or would discovering that infomation be Original Research? DavidLeeLambert (talk) 12:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion July 2022