Talk:Economic discrimination

message: Mm..good catch. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 17:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Price Discrimination != Predujidical pricing

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.See footnote
*Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
*This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.See footnote
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.See footnote 
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article.See footnote (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
*Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout. 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, ElaragirlTalk|Count 05:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autopeer review to do 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
*This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*You may wish to consider adding an appropriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?]
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*The script has spotted the following contractions: wasn't, aren't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AmusedRepose (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another autopeer 

message: Hello,
I just wanted to add that I am currently working on a page with a related topic to this one. 
As of now there is only one Wikipedia page, titled “Price Discrimination,” that dedicates space to talking about, more specifically, gender-based pricing discrimination. This page generally is poorly structured, includes original research, and only has one very small section discussing gender-based pricing discrimination - which itself is poorly organized and confusing. The parent page has been rated Start-Class. 
I have been advised to create my own subpage, which I hope to title “Gender-Based Price Discrimination,” in lieu of revamping the entire parent page. I also intend to sum up my article and change the parent page’s discussion on examples of gender-based price discrimination. As of now, the subsection discusses three cities/states that have litigated the issue or researched the issue. I will most likely add that information (if substantiated by relevant and appropriate sources) to my subpage and remove it from the parent page. I think it tends to bog down the reader with facts instead of explaining the overall concept of gender-based price discrimination.  I also believe it can easily be summed up on the parent page and discussed at length on the subpage. 
I have already created the new page: Gender-Based Price Discrimination
Here is my outline:
[Overview]
1 Gender Disparities in Pricing 
1.1 Gender Disparities in Pricing of Personal Care Products  
1.2 Gender Disparities in Retail Clothing
		1.2.1 Children’s Clothing 
		1.2.2 Adult Clothing
1.3 Gender Disparities in Health Care Products
		1.3.1 Senior Health Care
1.4 Gender Disparities in Car Prices
1.5 Gender Disparities in Services
		1.5.1 Hair Salons
1.6 Gender Disparities in Insurance 
		1.6.1 Health Insurance 
		1.6.2 Car Insurance 
2 Gender Disparities in Discounts 
	2.1 Ladies’ Night Discounts 
		2.1.2 New Jersey 
3 Gender Disparities in Taxes 
	3.1 Tampon Tax
4 Consumer Protection Laws 
	4.1 United States 
		4.1.1 Federal Reforms
		4.1.2 California
		4.1.3 New York City 
FPizzo (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender-Based Price Discrimination 

message: Dr. Baert has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Baert has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Baert, Stijn & De Visschere, Sarah & Schoors, Koen & Omey, Eddy, 2014. "First Depressed, Then Discriminated Against?," IZA Discussion Papers 8320, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Baert's comment on this article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Economic discrimination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071102215455/http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/132.ctl to http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/132.ctl
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi all. I will be expanding the article on occupational segregation in the next few months and will add a link to it in the "forms against workers" section of this page. Since currently Occupational segregation only talks about gender segregation, I will make the page more relevant to this article and discuss causes and effects, as well as possible solutions to racial occupational segregation to give a more holistic perspective. If you have any questions, feel free to check out my user page or sandbox! -Angelalin79 (talk) 01:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Occupational Segregation