lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kerrighed

message: I tried to clean up the article as per the :Category:Wikipedia_style_guidelines but don't know if it's enough to remove the cleanup tag, so I left it. Iluvitar 21:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chris Albertson

message: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/obituaries/chris-albertson-dead.html is a full and helpful obituary
Key details: found dead on 2019-04-24
“Columbia, with Chris Albertson heading up the project, has done a herculean job on the Bessie Smith reissues,” he wrote, noting that the strong sales for the first four sets had shown that “what started out as sort of a foundation altruistic project, a musical-archaeological dig into the works of a blues singer who died 34 years ago, has become a thriving investment.”
“Bessie” was quickly acknowledged as the definitive Bessie Smith biography. Reviewing it in The Los Angeles Times, the jazz critic Leonard Feather called it “the most devastating, provocative and enlightening work of its kind ever contributed to the annals of jazz literature.”
Bikestats (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Albertson has died (plus new NY Times obituary)
Talk:Loverboy (2005 film)

message: How about elaborating on the plot?
Hey! Hey! Maybe even making a plot stub
--  Shouldn't the first paragraph be a summary of the movie?  The info about everyone in Kevin Bacon's family being in the movie should not be the introductory paragraph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.75.167 (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've got an idea 

message: kakjong
:P:P dirty house rlaxt :P:P  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.163.63.240 (talk) 15:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  vato G 

message: I now see that someone here in the talkpage asked for  a more elaborate plot description (or any) -- I unfortunately came here to ask of the opposite ...
(In the meantime s.o. seems to have answered this previous request to an extent that might even be somewhat too much, but I am not completely sure about that (if it is too much or quite right)). 
What is clearly lacking however is, (somewhere BEFORE that detailed plot-telling,) a very short "abstract", in one or two sentences, of what the film is about - the woman's destructive psychiatric problem? Unfortunately (as English is not my native language) I do not know how to do it. Maybe someone else has the right words for that? :-) 2A02:3032:10:6983:1:2:E4C9:E6F8 (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks short theme summary
Talk:Hunter Valentine

message: Does anyone mind if I link Adrienne to the Buck's Rock page? Wikipedia is yelling at us to link to the page from o ther sources. UnderPressure 21:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Two thirds of the section "History" in the article are just copied from the Hunter Valentine website.  Hanna-Emilia (talk) 14:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied Content 
Talk:Ankarana Special Reserve

message: It would be nice to have a freely licensed photo with better resolution. —Keenan Pepper 21:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Recently the status of this reserve was updated to National Park. The Madagascar National Parks website lists it as such, and I have received a personal communication from Steven M. Goodman confirming it as such. The change will be a complex one so I am hesitant to put through a transfer request. I therefore recommend this action be taken by someone who has more experience than I with protected area wiki pages. – Mark D. Scherz 12:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ankarana is a National Park 
Talk:Claire Tomalin

message: Regarding this:
:She made a number of tongue-in-cheek criticisms against the Samuel Pepys Wikipedia article in The Guardian on 24 October 2005, awarding the page a score of 6/10.Guardian article Can you trust Wikipedia?, 24 October 2005  On 4 April 2009, Tomalin wrote to The Guardian and expressed facts on Thomas Hardy's life. The letter was titled "A Poet to the End".
Yeah chuckle but not really notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. The article could be incorporated by citing something else in it, but just saying "Tomalin said something about Wikipedia once" isn't that important. See also WP:SUBJECT. Green Cardamom (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on Wikipedia
Talk:Clare Balding

message: Clare Balding has presented a programme called "Horse Story" on BBC Radio 4. This could go in the section on her broadcasting career. Vorbee (talk) 08:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Horse Story

message: The following citation is given for her date of birth, but does not mention it:
*"Clare Balding", interview on BBC Wales website
Fortunately another citation already used in the article mentions her date of birth, and the names of her parents.
*
I have fixed it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong citation
Talk:18th United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 11:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article states that the House Committee on Expenditures in the War Department was chaired by George Edwards (a disambiguation page). However, to chair a House Committee, one must be a member of the House, yet no George Edwards is listed in the Members#House of Representatives section, which does seem to be complete otherwise. For now, I've removed George Edwards as chair of the committee. I hope that someone can figure this out. Lennart97 (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Edwards
Talk:Vivien Merchant

message: IMdB has her dying 3 Oct 1982.  Which is it?--Son of Somebody 20:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of death

message: The 'Katherine Blake' link (at the very bottom of this page) is spurious. Please, can someone remove it who knows how to? Harfarhs (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actress award winners 
Talk:List of Marvel Family enemies

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  15:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: I stumbled across this page from mistyped search. I noticed that the Clem and Dubner entry was very poorly edited. I attempted to make some corrections myself but as I have no knowledge on the topic my contributions are limited. --Jordan10la (talk) 20:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, many of these are very poorly written.  I added the copyedit tag so in time, editors will come along and work on improving it. I might work on it a bit at some point.  HotshotCleaner (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Much of these stories can be found on digital and fury comics, so can be edited if the sites are accessed. User:Catholic nerd 13:29 16th February 2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.208.216 (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clem and Dubner 

message: Why was my edit recognized as blanking? All that I did was change who to whom.
Idleyoshi (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blanking? 

message: So much of this, especially the Golden Age villains, seems to be copied from some other source. At this point, however, it's going to be pretty difficult to figure out where it was taken from. 2001:558:6045:A0:391F:B005:179D:8DD9 (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/paste? 

message: Split - Article should be split up by letter due to length.  Thoughts?--Jax 0677 (talk) 01:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split long article by letter?
Talk:Axis Amerika

message: I added an infobox a few days ago, but neglected to edit the talk page.Konczewski 20:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ....and then I discovered I'd edited this template incorrectly.  Fixing it now.Konczewski 17:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Corrie Corfield

message: The first External Link leads to a 404 page.
DavidUri (talk) 11:38, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It should probably lead here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/profiles/53wQB0zjldHNl4mkXWZmXcl/corrie-corfield 2.28.151.246 (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous link 

message: Why does "the new BBC 648" link to the Orfordness page?  Safebreaker (talk) 23:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orfordness
Talk:Lovett School

message: tell us more, refs reqd, pics, see below, welcome Victuallers 19:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess for Schools

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Beyond Corporation©

message: I'd suggest that Broccoli Men gets merged into this article. I'm not convinced they warrant an article all of their own (and if they do, it should probably be Broccoli Man, in line with WP:NAMING) - the best option would seem to be adding them into this article.  --Mrph 19:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Broccoli Men - merge proposal

message: Merge --Mrph 19:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote

message: * For what it's worth, I think Number None (who doesn't currently have an article) should also be dealt with as part of this article, for the same reasons. --Mrph 19:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: There appear to be a number of serious errors in this article with regards to the New Paramonts. Firstly, Forbush Man had no superpowers what so ever in his original Not Brand Echh appearances. Secondly, all the New Paramonts appeared previously in Not Brand Echh, not just Forbush Man. Thirdly, it was heavily implied that a S.I.L.E.N.T. agent was the one who stole the super pee that was used to create Charlie America from the Nazi spy. I'm fixing these, as well as some of the numerous grammatical errors.--Grammar Vigilante (talk) 07:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors
Talk:Terrence Hardiman

message: * Strictly speaking, he doesn't play a Nazi in Secret Army, but a Luftwaffe officer (hence the conflict with Kessler, the Nazi of the show).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.76.124.194 (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret Army

message: Has he really played Ronald McDonald? It seems very unlikely. I'm removing the 'clowns' clause until someone can find a source. 131.111.139.100 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authority Figures 

message: The Guardian obituary gives his date of death as 18 April. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2023/may/10/terrence-hardiman-obituary Samuel J Walker (talk) 17:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , Telegraph obit (that was initially used for his date of death) has now been changed to agree with the Guardian obit – so he did die on 18 April. I've changed it on his page. --Jkaharper (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Paddy Kenny

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 22:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:David Coleman

message: Anyone care to guess at who's been copying who and then paraphrasing?
Wikipedia:-
David Coleman, OBE (26 April 1926 – 21 December 2013) was a British sports commentator and TV presenter who worked for the BBC for over 40 years. He covered eleven Olympic Games from 1960 to 2000 and six football World Cups.
He presented some of the BBC's leading sporting programmes, including Grandstand and Sportsnight, and was the host of A Question of Sport for 18 years. He retired from the BBC in 2000. Later that year he became the first broadcaster to receive the Olympic Order award, in recognition of his contribution to the Olympic movement.[1]
BBC:-
He first appeared on air for the BBC in 1954, covering 11 Olympic Games from Rome in 1960 to Sydney 2000 and six football World Cups.
Coleman presented some of the BBC's leading sporting programmes, including Grandstand and Sportsnight, and was the host of Question of Sport for 18 years.
He was awarded an OBE in 1992 and retired from the BBC in 2000.
Later that year he became the first broadcaster to receive the Olympic Order award, in recognition of his contribution to the Olympic movement.
My guess is that the BBC have been 'researching' him online as having worked for them for 40 years they know little about him, but I mention it in case I'm wrong. --wintonian talk 18:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also please be carefull out there and bear in mind this is the sort of thing that can happen if editors are not carefull about following WP:CIRCULAR. --wintonian talk 19:29, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: When Bobby Robson died, The Telegraph and the BBC both flagrantly plagiarised Wikipedia.  To the word.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes be we do use an open licence allowing anyone to reuse however they like, thus leading to the risk that we go round and round in circles and eventually all fall down the 'rabbit hole'. --wintonian talk 19:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

text: According to his Guardian obit he only covered five World Cups, not six (and 16 Olympics in total, both summer and winter). Jinjibïar (talk) 01:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poss Copyright Issues
Talk:Nicolas Vouilloz

message: I'm in the process of re-writing this from scratch to bring it to somewhere near the standard that it deserves, but I don't have any suitable images. If anyone has such images that they are willing to release to Wikimedia, please do so and leave a message on my talk page to let me know. Thanks. Adrian M. H. 18:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images needed
Talk:David Lee (art critic)

message: For quote from the magazine's official web site. This short passage of text is used in the article, which is about the editor and owner of the magazine whose web site the text is from. It is considered that this significantly helps the reader's understanding of the topic and that understanding of the topic would be impaired without it. It shows the individual's unique and noted humour and style, in a way that can only be properly understood by reading it in the original phraseology. It is considered that this will not cause commercial harm to the copyright holder. It is believed that this is fair use and does not infringe copyright. There is no known free alternative available.
According to section 107 of the United States Copyright Act of 1976 :
The fair use of a copyrighted work...for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
The text is used for non-profit purposes. This factor is noted as relevant by the Act.
Ty 11:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale
Talk:Jerome Davis Greene

message: This article needs extensive grammatical and punctuation and style editing.
--caroldermoid 22:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Friends, editors, this needs correcting so one can send a link to this page. Many thanks.William Macadam (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The internet Link to this page goes to the photo of him not the article
Talk:Willem

message: User:Brat32 thinks this page is too short or without reasons, despite the number of
other ones exactly like it - Will , William already on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTruthSeeker (talk • contribs) 
:Please do not confuse the issue, I tagged it for immediate deletion when it had one line with no content. You then removed the speedy deletion tag incorrectly. You since added content, and I did not bother putting the tag back. And please add your signature to posts as I explained on your talk page. --Brat32 22:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, tag replaced since you're complaining. And the original article said "placeholder", so it was expected that new content would be coming - which it did, in a few minutes. TheTruthSeeker 22:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not tracking this discussion, but the disambiguation page as it currently stands is a good start, so I'm re-removing the CSD tag. -- nae'blis 03:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hichiriki

message: These may be useful in expanding the article:
*ARTS ABROAD; Ex-Court Musician Now Courts the Japanese Public
Feel free to add more. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional links
Talk:Self-report study

message: Gosh, self-report studies are used for all kinds of research other than criminology. The relative validity of research absed on self-report vs. research based on observed behavior is a pretty central debate in all sociology and psych!
DanB DanD 22:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

message: There is no talk about blinding in self-report studies.   Could these types of studies be blinded?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.178.228.39 (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  blinding
Talk:Rubin vase

message: Why is the Canadian Flag there?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.158.197.66 (talk) 22:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: I don't understand why this is termed an "illusion". It's just an ambiguous image, while "illusion" implies a deception of the eye/brain. It seems to me this is no more an illusion than the fact that text, with my middle-aged eyes, looks like blurs and blobs up close, but held at sufficient distance (or with more light) looks like text. Real illusions are impossible, or nearly so, to switch off, but the Rubin vase just requires looking at the object(s) in a different way. Perhaps I misunderstand the term "illusion." (or maybe I'm just puzzled because, contrary to these Gestalt assertions, I have no trouble seeing both the vase and the faces simultaneously -- in fact, I can't see them any other way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.61.134 (talk) 02:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  illusion? 

message: The title of this page is "Rubin vase", while the article body uses "Rubin's vase"; this should be standardized. 128.76.194.227 (talk) 23:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubin's vs Rubin
Talk:Kakko (instrument)

message: Are the kanji 羯鼓 or 鞨鼓  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Badagnani (talk • contribs) 11:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are correct. The latter is an older usage. Also, please don't do that funky Wiktionary linking when including kanji in articles. Please use the method indicated at WP:MOS-JA in order to keep all Japan-related articles consistent. Thanks! ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I don't agree that blanking Wiktionary links assists our users in having the best, most informative article possible. Badagnani (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then use . That's what it's for. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which are the real kanji?
Talk:Tsuzumi

message: :Introduced from India in the 13th century, the name is derived from Sanskrit.
The Japanese article, ja:鼓, seems to mention that it was derived from larger drums that were inspired by the janggu of Korea.According to janggu, the janggu was based on a smaller drum called the yogo, and the yogo seems to have an Indian origin. However, it would be unfair to say that the tsuzumi was introduced directly from India if it's only indirectly based on the janggu/yogo/indian drum.You might say that I shouldn't be using Wikipedia as a primary source, but this is an inconsistency that needs to be addressed, IMHO. --Kjoonlee 03:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Lastikman

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sennecaster  (What now?) 06:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed