lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pandya kingdom (Mahabharata)

message: The Early Pandyan kingdom might have been founded by the Villavar hunters - Meenavar Fishermen people of Dravidian Tamil origin.The northern counterparts of Villavar Meenavar, The Bhil Meena mentioned in the Mahabharata. King Virat might have belonged to the Matsya Kingdom equivalent to Dravidian Meeenavar. The Pandya king was called Saranga dhawaja because his flag displayed the Bow and he belonged to the Villavar people of South India.
The Pandyan kingdom in the later historical period had twin fish as emblem indicating the mixture of Meenavar (fishermen) people with the Villavar people.
Vilmeenkodi (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarangadhwaja  - Saranga (Bow) + Dwaja (Flag) 

message: Pandyas are Dravidian Tamils who evolved from ancient Villavar Meenavar people.The Meenavar people disappeared after mixing with the Naga tribes. Even now Villavar tribes survive in South India.According to Kalithokai an ancient Tamil treatise the enemies of the Villavar Meenavar people were the Nagas from North India. The Pandyan Kingdom survived repeated attacks of Nagas. The first war with Nagas was fought at Kumari Kandam an ancient mythical home land of Pandiyan people south of Kanyakumari in which the Pandyan king Chenkon won. After the Kumari Kandam was drowned in a deluge the Pandyan kingdom was founded at the banks of Thamira Parani river in south Tamil nadu with its capital at Korkai.  The united armies of Villavar and Meenavar people lost a battle with the Nagas in which Nagas became masters of Central India in the prehistory according to Kalithokai.
Nagas were the arch enemies of the Pandyan villavar people. Pandavas may belong to the Naga race and not related to Pandiyan people.
Villavars are Patriarchal Tamil people belonging to Dravidian race who practised  Monogamy. The Nagas including Pandavas practised Polyandry which most of the pure Dravidians disapprove.
Vilmeenkodi (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pandyas Vs Pandavas 

message: Old Tamil literature says that the first Tamil Sangams organised by the Pandyan kings lasted approximately 4000 years, the second Tamil Sangham for about 4000 years and the third for 2000 years making the Pandya Kingdom among the most ancient kingdoms of India. The events mentioned in Mahabharata may date from 1200 BC or earlier.
Vilmeenkodi (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pandyan Kingdom  in the Prehistory - Mahabharatha 

message: The Pandyan kingdom did exist in the South Karnataka in the Udupi area,and the Alupas kingdom of the Tulu Nadu could be a branch.   
Vilmeenkodi (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gokarna ( Udupi ) in  Pandyan Kingdom
Talk:Salvador Santana

message: Originally I wrote born obviously 1984 as I did not found in internet any exact date, only sentences like he is 21 years old etc. Did you found something else? -jkb- 07:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth 

message: This link is in error. Here Jose S is a politician. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.65.111.74 (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jose Santana
Talk:Princess (web series)

message: Isn't the Princess theme song originally sung by the 'Evil' Cartman in the Halloween episode, Spookyfish? If it is, it should be noted. --Gero 07:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Song 

message: I was under the impression that tearing up a contract did not void the legal agreement it represented.
:I think the wording is just a figure of speech to mean they canceled it. Cronos12390 17:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contract 

message: just added the lyrics for the song!--66.253.145.149 (talk) 07:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics

message: I'm unable to find any sources that can be used to verify that this content was made by Trey Parker & Matt Stone.  There's a link to South Park Studios that can't be verified and a link to SPSChat, a fansite which doesn't provide any reliable sources to back up its claim that Trey Parker and Matt Stone had anything to do with Princess.  In fact, the South Park Studios reference was previously linked to SPSChat as can be seen in this version of the article.  I've gone through 2 pages of Google News Archive hits and haven't found a single reliable source that dsicusses the topic.  I'm marking the article with refimprove and if a reliable source isn't produced in the next three days, I'm going to nominate the article for a deletion discussion. OlYellerTalktome 02:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: After seeing that the refimprove template has been present since 2007, I'm going to go ahead and take this to AfD. OlYellerTalktome 02:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
File talk:Acção Comunista (magazine).jpg

message: This image is of a magazine cover. If the image is currently tagged , how, therefore, is it "an image with a fair use tag which is patently unrelated to the content of the image"? jareha (comments) 07:33, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it could've said it was a magazine, which I see has now been clarified. I thought it was a poster, which would not fall under that fair use rationale. TheProject 00:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Stinger (cocktail)

message: "In High Society (1956) Gordon Richards in his role as Dexter-Haven's butler..." The link on Richard's name goes to jockey Sir Gordon Richards.  If this is indeed that man, then someone needs to cross reference it on his page, where there is no mention of his every having acted or been in a movie.  It would probably also be a good idea to say something here about him being a famous jockey, rather than an actor. If it is some other Gordon Richards, then the link to the jockey's page needs to be removed.  Zlama (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gordon Richards reference 

message: Noted that characters in the future dystopia "Make Room Make Room!" (Soylent Green), were pondering the origin of the name "Stinger" for the cocktail (while they drink gin Gibsons with tiny pickled onions). Neither does Wikipedia. 31.48.111.241 (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 

message: Ray Milland's character in this movie is a big fan of this drink and drinks several throughout the film. 86.29.3.42 (talk) 08:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Big Clock
Talk:Caveh Zahedi

message: *Deletion!?!??!?
Why the hell would Calton propose this article be deleted? Zahedi has 76,000 hits on Google. I don't understand. This article should be kept and protected from deletion. TruthCrusader 07:51, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this guy notable? He seems like just another struggling (and misguided!) film student. -- Mikeblas 21:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 
Talk:J. J. Connolly

message: The narrator is already shown to have survived at the end of the book, its only in the movie version that whether he lives or dies is left up to question
I think the "original singer for the Sex Pistols" is bullshit. While funny in a "self-written bio in the back of a magazine" way, it has no place in Wikipedia IMHO.
In fact, I think most of this is bullshit.
--Hexrei 07:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goldsmiths, University of London

message: In the "Notable Alumni" section, it lists "founding members of the British rock band Blur Alex James and Graham Coxon." However, Damon Albarn - quite possibly the most famous (or "notable") member of Blur and basically the band's unofficial leader ALSO attended this university alongside Alex James and Graham Coxon. But his name is omitted from that section. Albarn's name is present in the FULL article for the alumni, but not here in the "Notable Alumni" section of the University's article. Which isn't a HUGE deal, it's just that if you're gonna point out that Alex James & Graham Coxon of Blur are notable alumni of the University, then it seems a bit strange to leave out Damon Albarn's name.
*I* would've gone in and quickly added his name to that sentence myself, but there is no option anywhere for me to edit this Wikipedia article (which I suppose makes sense, since it's a big fancy British university and all that jizz-jazz). So that means I can't do anything but come here, to the article's talk page, and simply suggest that someone....y'know...do that. So here I am, presenting that very suggestion. Riiiiiight.....NOW:
[Presenting suggestion] Someone should...y'know...do that. >sniff< Yeeeup. [Suggestion presented]
Well, that is all. S'pank you. S'pank you very much. AnarchoGonzo (talk) 11:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to/slight alteration to "Notable Alumni" section 

message: In the history section please Jacobin 357 (talk) 05:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A list of the wardens
Talk:Ryoto Machida

message: :He is the only man to disrupt Rich “Ace” Franklin’s perfect MMA fight record. It is true that Ryoto “Lyoto” Machida did have a significant weight advantage on many of the fighters he has defeated, however, Rich “Ace” Franklin is one of the veterans of the dehydration program. It is debated that he is well over 200 lbs when he steps into the octagon, while fighting in the light heavy weight division(185lb).
:It is difficult to reference the past, if Ryoto were to ever fight Rich again. We will probably never see this fight, since Rich is not fighting outside the UFC at the time. Ryoto has yet to get a major contract with the “Big Two”: UFC or PRIDE.
There's several problems with the above passage. The first paragraph is basically speculation about Franklin's true body weight at the fight. Since it was totally unsourced and was an opinion that suggested there was not a weight disadvantage without saying anything concrete, it's not verifiable and counter to WP:NPOV and WP:V.  The second paragraph is also speculatory and conflicts wth WP:NOT#Wikpedia is not a crystal ball. I suggest it be reconsidered if writing so much about Franklin is warranted in the first place, since it puts too much weight into his fight with Franklin, other than being Franklin's only loss, it's otherwise not that notable of a fight. hateless 19:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text removed 

message: ""Ryoto is considered a rising star in MMA, having secured victories over former UFC Middleweight Champion Rich Franklin, former UFC Welterweight Champion B.J. Penn, and Light Heavyweight runner-up of the UFC's The Ultimate Fighter Season 1, Stephan Bonnar. It should be noted, however, that Machida had a significant weight advatage in these fights""
If you go to Rich's article, it says there WAS NOT a significant weight advantage. I think the encyclopedia should at least be consistent. Christ...which is it?--Donnie from the mean streets of Boston, KY 21:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a source, both points should be removed. hateless 21:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory info
Wikipedia talk:Signature types

message: I've removed this:
: Just because a policy exists does not mean someone will obey that particullar policy. Therefore we could investigate the ability to add a flag that would always substitute with the formal signature on certain namespaces.
Needless to say, all editors are expected to follow Wikipedia policy. There are no exceptions. --Tony Sidaway 01:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With that, my point was that while all editors are expected to follow Wikipedia policy, it is a fact that there are some editors that do not. However, instead of taking time from other editors by having to go through and do cleanup, issue expanations, warnings & bans if appropriate it would be easier if the software did some of it for us. --Charlie( t | e ) 05:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of removal of a point by [[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]
Talk:Climate: Long range Investigation, Mapping, and Prediction

message: According to some newer publications, the temperature reconstructions in the tropical regions might have been much lower than what CLIMAP said:
This paper, that one and also this article contradict the assumption of warm temperatures during ice ages in the tropics. The main author of this article might consider to review these sources and correct the article accordingly. Hg6996 (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CLIMAP errors
Talk:Jason Smith (rugby league)

message: I have removed POV comments about him being the best damn player ever. Article definitely needs work including state of origin and Australian representations. Capitalistroadster 08:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some cleaning up, including reorganising the sections. Agreed, more stats definitely required.--58.106.16.48 01:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sahaja Yoga/Archive 1

message: Removed content by user KillBossy, uncorroborated theory.
Shane 04:57, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which content are you referring to? That editor added something about the follow up to a study, which is in the abstract of the study. "There were no significant differences between the two groups at the 2 month follow up assessment." What theory is uncorroborated? -Willmcw 05:17, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the information, but I disagree. Even the encyclopedia Britannica has a disclaimer, but that does not mean that this is good reason to remove the external links to it or not use the information it provides. Andries 21:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 3/12/05

message: I removed the links to the Rick_Ross institute. 
http://www.religioustolerance.org/acm2.htm
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/130-rick-ross
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/false_exp/rossr1.html
according to many, Rick Ross, the founder of the institute is a 'false specialist' in the field, having no doctorate or diploma to backup his research except for a high school degree.
http://www.culteducation.com/cv.html
Also called into question is his POV, being of the Jewish faith.
To top it all off, the man has a criminal record, dating back to when he illegaly kidnapped an individual in an attempt to "deprogram" him - one of many attempts at individuals and organisation's freedom of expression
Shane 06:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: None of those are sufficient reasons to remove links to his website. -Will Beback 21:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, the links in question are simply reprints of newspaper articles. -Will Beback 21:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rick Ross insitute
Talk:Christine Chatelain

message: http://thecollectortv.com/42.html
That site / page has a photo of her with another actor from "the collector" TV series and a short bio.  
Born / raised Vancouver, BC.  Date of birth not given.
In 2004 "Intern Academy" she plays an intern who earns money for her education and training by being a stripper.  During the strip show she is very beautiful / gorgeous, and several of the other film's characters say as much when they watch her strip show. No naughty bits are shown however.  A google image search gives only a couple of valid hits. Oldspammer 08:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.internacademymovie.com/
Has images.  One of them is a shot of the strip show clip.  Further into the site (under "Admitting Entrance" Macromedia Flash hot spot link) is a slighly more extensive bio and picture of its "main young star" (Christine Chatelain), but the presentation is on a Macromedia Flash page within "the young stars" link.  Due to the nature of the flash player plugin, the information is unable to highlight or copy / paste so that its content can be easily paraphrased here.  A larger image of the strip show can be found under the Macromedia Flash link "Image Gallery" within the "Admitting Enterance" part of the site.  The site's links do not as yet include a site or page dedicated to Christine Chatelain. Oldspammer 08:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Page
Talk:The Pied Piper (1986 film)

message: I have recently seen a Barta DVD compilation called Labyrinth of Darkness (2006), which included this short movie.  However, its ending credits, as well as the cover of the DVD, say 1985, not 1986.  —PaleoNeonate – 03:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the link is dead, but the other, , appears to confirm.  I'll put this on my TODO list, will wait about a week for input, then simply rename/edit the article as necessary if there's no objection since then.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 03:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

text: It likely refers to the production year. But the release year was 1986, which is what we go by here. Smetanahue (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, at least we now have a supporting source for 1985.  —PaleoNeonate – 09:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Oops, actually, that also is 1985. —PaleoNeonate – 09:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

text: But I see "premiere": 1986.  Thanks again, —PaleoNeonate – 09:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1985
Talk:Zero-copy

message: Any one can give a example about zeor-copy in Linux/BSD system ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nexthop (talk • contribs) 
:Some of the Linux network drivers use zero-copy, as described in the article. -- RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 18:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: The current version (from 19 June 2014‎) of the article has a good structure:
# Principle
# Hardware implementations
# Programmatic access. I suggest this structure to be maintained and the sections to be extended. User:ScotXWt@lk 11:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article structure 

message: Could we say Linux Direct I/O is equivalent to zero-copy?
Linux Device Drivers, Jonathan Corbet, Alessandro Rubini and Greg Kroah-Hartman, 3rd edition, 0'Reilly 2005, chapter 15, section Performing Direct I/0, pp 435-437
I think it is, in the sense that it avoid any copy in the kernel.
I propose to add at least the reference.
--Olly The Happy (talk) 09:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct I/O? 

message: I found this article when wondering why there is no discussion of locate-mode I/O anywhere. The important idea of locate-mode is to reduce copying, even in a higher-level language. In PL/I, you can do locate-mode I/O, such that a READ, instead of copying data into your buffer gives you a pointer to the actual system buffer. To write, you request a pointer to the output buffer, work on the data there, then ask for it to be written out. This bypasses any copy between the user buffer and the system I/O buffers. I notice the OS/360 example, but as far as I know, the OS360 nucleus (what might now be called kernel) never copies data. Gah4 (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  locate-mode 

message: As per request of "This article relies largely or entirely on a single source ..." I have added a few more reference links to better illustrate the concept of zero copy used in operating systems. Ade56facc 13:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added more reference sources 

message: While zero copy is nice, it is not always possible. One should, though, still have to goal to minimize copies. I am reminded of RFC893, trailer encapsulation for TCP/IP data, which was meant to minimize copies. (Though it never caught on and is now depricated.) The usual IP implementation has various headers, some variable length, that are added as data goes through steps on its way to being sent, and removed after being received. That can be done by copying to the appropriate place in a buffer and then writing the header bytes. Trailer encapsulation puts the added data at the end, avoiding such copies. Even more, it was designed such that one could keep buffers on a page boundary (512 bytes on VAX), though that might not always be needed. In any case, there is a lot of data movement in some systems, and minimizing it makes some sense. Gah4 (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  trailers
Talk:Jagdgeschwader 52

message: it would be useful to know what the initial. theoretical and actual manpower and number of aircraft of the group was during its period of operations; also the rotation and replacement rates of pilots and other manpower and of machines  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.221.233 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HELPFUL INFO

message: I'm preserving it here by providing this link. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited / unreliably cited material 

message: Preserving it here by providing this link.  K.e.coffman (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced and / or POV material 

message: This is a "document" for the organization of this page. In my head, it makes sense to put this here, as the Talk page is stapled onto the article itself. This is based heavily on this version of Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II), which was made an A-class article in 2008.
;Lead: The universal head of the article, which contains an abbreviated version of the article. Essentially the stuff that the casual reader is looking for, like a brief history. The rest of the article is purely context for this.
;Formation history: The earliest period in the unit's history, covering formation. I don't want the reader to scroll down and immediately be slapped with wikitables and a paragraph on Luftwaffe organization, which largely doesn't concern the unit itself. By covering the formation of the unit known as Jagdgeschwader 52, the reader will have context for the aforementioned wikitables containing very basic information on the unit's squadrons (staffeln).
;Organizational structure: The aforementioned wikitables and paragraph on Luftwaffe organization during the war, which contains in its first two paragraphs the command structure and basic tactics of the Luftwaffe's fighter wings. More importantly, it has subsections for every gruppe, and staffel in JG 52's case, which will contain a basic individual history of those gruppe, and their staffeln as necessary (planes/variants thereof flown, notable pilots and/or events, etc.).
;History section(s): The history of the unit as a whole, divided into important operations or certain periods of time (Ex: "Operation Barbarossa" or "Phoney War", rather than "1944" or "1945").
;Commanding officers: I'm on the fence about this one. Editor K.e. Coffman has axed prior versions of this section, as they were poorly cited or uncited, but the section doesn't look as nice as it could. Perhaps replace the lists with tables?
;Rest of the nine yards: See also, Notes and Citations, References, External Links, authority control, and the article's categories.
X –Vami_IV✠ 06:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan 

message: "ww2.dk" is not a reliable source as it is user-generated and must be replaced. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 01:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to self: 2 August 2020

message: Ka-pow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 18:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived "commanding officers" section
Talk:Bugs Bunny: Superstar

message: Despite the listing in the MGM web site at , the film is technically owned by Time Warner's Turner Entertainment unit and distribution rights since 1999 is held by Warner Home Video. Steelbeard1 (talk) 23:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current ownership 

message: I have a picture of the original movie poster but don't know how to put it in.
--gaastra  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaastra (talk • contribs) 01:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie poster

message: I downloaded the film from the iTunes Store, and it had a 1990s GoldenEye United Artists logo. Or Showgirls. Or Hackers. Any idea who owns this film? 68.229.40.204 (talk) 21:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  iTunes Version
Talk:The Looney Looney Looney Bugs Bunny Movie

message: As I recall, this was Friz Freleng's answer to the Chuck Jones-centric The_Bugs_Bunny/Road_Runner_Movie, but I don't have any detail about it (critical comparisons, motivations, etc. Does anyone have information to elaborate on this? --Happylobster 15:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recall