Talk:Witchblade

message: I think that the section "Issue events breakdown" can be moved to another page. Which could allow more information included, reduce de size of the main article, and remove potential spoilers from the main page. Comments? --Guille2015 03:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It also needs to be made NPOV.--KrossTalk 12:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: That Yumi character is supposed to be 15? You can see her butt in the accompanying image. Does anyone else think this is a bit much? Do we need to have it in the article?
:I think you're over-reacting a bit.  It is a cartoon character after all.  And please remember to sign your comments by placing four ~ after your comment. Konczewski 03:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yumi picture... 

message: :Image:Excalibur3.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Excalibur3.gif

message: Finally found a pic
http://www.tokyopop.com/WraithMaster/photo/372699.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.245.122.98 (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The trouble is, that image doesn't have any licensing information associated with it that I can see. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, so a license is needed before uploading it —αlεx•mullεr 17:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

text: It's a light novel.  Bonotake (talk) 06:26, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Witchblade Lost Generation 

message: I am sure I saw a Witchblade as a staff with two swords on the end, and not only in Dawn of War. Does anyone else know where this is? --98.215.53.250 (talk) 16:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other witchblade weapon?

message: Should we make a article about the manga?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.230.11 (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. It strikes me that the article is actually missing a lot of information about the comic series - which should be the core. It makes sense to split off the adaptations to their separate articles so the bulk of the article can be refocused on the comics. The anime and TV series are already split off, the film will be when it is closer to being released, so I think the manga should be too. (Emperor (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Several of the links in the Witchblade wielders section of the article redirect right back to that section of the article, making the links, in my opinion, useless. Should those links be removed? Heiyuu (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link confusion 

message: Why is there nothing in the wiki article about the previous Witchblade film? I mean, I saw it. Three times. I wouldn't know Witchblade at all if not for this movie. Henre (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the existing Witchblade film? 

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: I'm just wondering if it'd be worth it to actually list what specific issues these bearers are mentioned in - I haven't heard of half the people on the list (or in the case of many of the historical figures, was not aware they were mentioned as bearers). I guess that calls the verifiability into question, right? I think it'd be a lot more helpful if there was some sort of citation listing where those bearers appeared or were mentioned, otherwise anyone could go around adding pretty much any name to that list, making the list even less useless than it already is. Xenomrph (talk) 04:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List of bearers

message: The movie site referenced (link #2, www.witchblade2009.com), seems to be a german generic mmorpg squatter site now. Nonsensical text and paid links and such. Anyone know if there is a new site for the movie or if the whole project was simply scrapped?
Iueras (talk) 08:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Site 

message: An image used in this article, File:Witchblade Dark Minds The Return of Paradox.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 2 November 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Witchblade Dark Minds The Return of Paradox.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: As I noted in a previous post, the movie site witchblade2009.com was a squatter site. Now, it is just plain blank. Obviously this movie is not in the works -- there has been no mention of it for years and the website for it is completely gone. Based on this, I am removing the section about the "upcoming" movie. Iueras (talk) 23:46, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the section about the movie 

message: It has been suggested Ian Nottingham should be merged I personally agree with it. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger prosposal 

message: An anonymous IP address continues to revert without explanation, changing the description of the Witchblade from "gauntlet" to "bracelet". It isn't a bracelet. Every single cover of the original comic books show it as a gauntlet. The anime series and TV show also show it as a gauntlet, although it becomes a bracelet after being donned. I am not seeing any source describing it as a bracelet. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Gauntlet vs bracelet

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Witchblade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019194928/http://www.gonzo.co.jp/works/0601.html to http://www.gonzo.co.jp/works/0601.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified