lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America

message: Are not Mennonites considered to be part of the Anabaptist movement and therefore invited to be participants in the BPF ... or at least have a link to the Anabaptists today section of the above article?
--MaxHund July 6, 2005 08:50 (UTC) (a Baptist PK who became a Quaker)
:The Mennonites are indeed part of the Anabaptist tradition.  However, the Baptist churches are historically linked to the English Separatist movement of the 16th century.  Interestingly, John Smyth (who founded the Baptist church in England) moved away from him Baptist views and sought to join the Mennonite church.  He died before doing so, but many of his early followers did.  68.113.47.11 (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mennonites 

message: Wouldn't it be relevant to include the other Christian Peace Fellowships as external links? such as ,, , , , and .
--MaxHund July 6, 2005 08:50 (UTC)
:I would think a reasonable approach would be to write brief (or longer as one is led and able) but encyclopedic articles on each of these groups for Wikipedia, and to create a category (or even so that pages on similar non-Christian groups such as the Muslim Peace Fellowship could be included). Then each group's own website could be linked to where it was immediately relevant (External Links lists on any given page should be kept short, they say). I may do just this one of these days if none of you beat me to the punch... but by all means do, "one of these days" is sometimes a long long time. --Haruo 17:34, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Christian Peace Fellowships 
Talk:Zoltán Kodály

message: Who in the world is Sir Wick-_-???
:Do not know--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fans" section 

message: The link  was not working (I got a page in Hungarian which probably translates as "404 Not Found"), so I removed it. JLeander 00:39, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 

message: In Close Encounters of the Third Kind, the hand signs Zoltan devised to teach music to deaf children are used to denote the tones the alien craft produce.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.0.159 (talk) 23:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture 

message: :I'd encourage enthusiastic editors to work more on this. I'm very grateful for the work that has been performed on this item. Kodaly is a major guy. Calamitybrook (talk) 02:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: May have a look through soon: --Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have made a new version of the eLinks but something has gone wrong (no idea what it is).--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 15:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article

message: I've removed the external link to magyarorszag, per WP:EL;
The link was incorrect anyway.
The link to the page, which could be used to improve this article, is here.   Chzz  ►  09:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links removed 

message: If Kodály lived in Galanta, why isn't this fact mentioned in the current version of this article? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lived in [[Galanta]]?
Talk:Frank Martin (composer)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Screening test fallacy

message: It's not obvious from the text of the article, what kind of misuse has author in mind. There are 2 possibilities:
* False positives like that in bayesian inference article. This is not a misuse in the correct sense of the world, but rather a property of bayesian interpretation of probabilities, which cannot accurately convey how much information you have. If this is the case, then there should be explained this connection and also better example with apriori probabilities given.
* Or the author just wanted to point out forgetting of prior probability or equating conditional probability with unconditional one, as would lines like
:Many people succumb to the belief that Ralph has an 80% chance of having the disease and his sister has a 10% chance of having the disease. Some people may decide that Ralph has 81.8% chance of having the disease and his sister has 11.1% chance of having the disease.
:suggest. 
So unless this is decided, it should be considered inaccurate. Samohyl Jan 20:06, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy - the original author's intent is not clear
Talk:A Static Lullaby

message: Don't call this band emo, hardcore, screamo, post-hardcore, etc.  They are none of these genres.
---Why not? They scream their lyrics (common in hardcore, screamo, and post-hardcore), while playing power chords very fast, and very distorted (signature of hardcore punk rock). You have renamed it to rock. The Beatles is rock. A Static Lullaby is screamo or 'emocore'.
-they are neither screamo or emocore.  they are metalcore/post-hardcore. Iii9ix3 03:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: I'm going to put the tracklist of the albums and some more things let me know if something is wrong. A Static Lullaby rocks!!!!!!--Andresfrias 04:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 

message: I just add the lyrics of the albums let me know if you like that —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andresfrias (talk • contribs) 07:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: I'm doing some album reviews. doing like short sumaries of each album let me know if it's ok —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.110.83.121 (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album reviews 

message: Does anyone have any info about this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.93.221 (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demo 2001 

message: I have tagged :File:Staticlullaby.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 00:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Staticlullaby.jpg]] may be deleted 
Talk:Cultural determinism

message: I am afraid that this article has an inherent drawback. Economy is a term that encompasses a certain class of social behavior. Culture is a term to encompass everything. Therefore while it is reasonable to speak about "economic determinism", to speak about "cultural determinism" is meaningless without clearly defining what exactly defines what. For example, it is reasonable to speak of cultural determinism with respect to individual, i.e., how culture  (however vague the term might be) influences on person's behavior, sice one may clearly separate an individual from society. But when speaking that "culture" influences "political arrangements" one assumes that "politics" is something not cultural. Politics is part of culture. And one may as well argue that "politics influences culture". 
So, before undertaking the endeavor of this article, please define your terms. Otherwise it will be a kind of "pseudoscience" or tautology or a list of quotations.  
Also, please do not forget that the article is about a term. Who of notable persons used or coined the term? How did this person use the term?  If you just delve into ancient greeks, then it will be a personal essay that tries to introduce the term taht encompasses certain observations. Mikkalai 23:40, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid that your knee-jerk reaction does not reflect the current artricle. If you are so educated, please tell me in what works Margaret Meade used the term "cultural determinism". Also, are you saying that  "personality traits that we label masculine or feminine" are not part of the human culture?  Mikkalai 02:04, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Also, I don't have to have "a good reading of the subject". The current article is supposed to deliver it for me. Moreover, I'd expect an answer to my concerns, not to my level of intelligence. Mikkalai 02:10, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: A am not that obsessed with "truth". I am not saying that the article does not make sense. I am saying that it is not knit sufficiently tightly for encyclopedia. As you mentioned, I am not an expert in the issue. I tried to speak from the position of a layman's common sense. If I could improve the text, I'd have already done this. Unfortunately I can only express my concerns. If you read this as a moron's babble, fine with me.  Mikkalai 02:59, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary concerns
Talk:Night of the Dead

message: I've just tidied up the links to film titles, but someone more familiar with the festival might like to check that they now all point to the right films, or are redlinks if the films aren't in WikiPedia.  eg I amended Storm Warning to Storm Warning (2007 film) as the only film on the disambiguation page was Storm Warning (film) 1951 starring Ronald Reagan!  PamD 12:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  links 

message: This year started an anime alike the NotD called High School of the Dead, should it be typed in here or not - you decide, I just thought that this is quite important. Entroop (talk) 15:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HotD 

message: "Night of the Dead IV was the last to take place at the Lounge Cinema."
Not sure about the first two but Night of the Dead III was at Hyde Park Picture House.  I think IV might have been the only one at the Lounge.
The line-up for III was Bubba Ho-Tep, Undead, House Of The Dead, Mucha Sangre and Beyond Re-Animator (though I think House of the Dead might have been subbed for something else - I was there and have literally no memory of seeing it at all :) )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.194.111 (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venue
Talk:William Henry Farquhar

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/William Henry Farquhar.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 00:22, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm concerned by one of the votes at the VfD page linked above.
:Delete. Article does not establish noteworthiness persisting into the present day. --User:Angr 16:14, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote
Talk:William Schuman

message: This page is NO help with a vocal Music Report this site contains no information.
:What kindof information were you looking for? Hyacinth 19:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: It seems to me that the external links are slowly becoming an advertisement for Polisi's biography.  I suggest they be removed unless the source really contains useful biographical information that is not available elsewhere. -- kosboot (talk) 19:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shill for Polisi's book 

message: "He also arranged Charles Ives' organ piece Variations on "America" for orchestra  in 1963, in which version it is better known."
Evidence for this statement?  Reference?  I may be an organist, but I've also played other Schuman pieces in bands, and hadn't heard of this arrangement. — JTL 06:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Music

message: Re: violin concerto "most powerful works ..." If you are going to give a direct quotation like that, it needs a citation. Bhami (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing reference for violin concerto review
Talk:List of Meredith Music Festival lineups by year

message: The link to Chris Wilson was removed. An article by that name was just deleted following a VfD vote. That article referred to a Chris Wilson who was found not to meet the recommended general criteria for inclusion of biographies or the music-specific WP:NMG. It is unclear to me whether or not this article was attempting to refer to the same person.  If it is a different Chris Wilson, the link should probably not be recreated here until an encyclopedic article has been written on this Chris Wilson. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 00:33, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlinking
Talk:Robert Starer

message: Thanks for the article. I've made the french version: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Starer.
Blaujacket (talk) 17:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks for the article
Talk:Kaliurang

message: :You can reach Kaliurang by taking the main road from the Yogyakarta ring road on the north side. Road signs will tell you where to go and the road is also named after the town (Jalan Kaliurang). Before entering the village itself, visitors from outside are requested to pay a small amount before they are allowed in.
:Public buses, large and smaller ones, ply the route without a time schedule. Just stop a bus when you see it. During the weekend the road towards the town can be crowded, you can partially avoid these crowds by taking a motorbike.
CDC (talk) 01:11, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to reach
Talk:Anarchism/Archive 15

message: :Ha ha, this is funny!  I just realized that this is all a misunderstanding!  You see, the recent visitors to the article took a wrong turn at their last link and ended up on what they thought was Nazism but they landed on this article!  Ha, so you see it's all very humorous, you just forgot to read the title of the article at the top of the page.  Nazism is the article these visitors are looking to edit.  What a hilarious misunderstanding.  --Fatal 21:07, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hilarious!

message: From the website improperly inserted by anon to propagandize his personal politic:  Some communities could be socialistic, others capitalistic, others deeply religious, others anti-religious. This is not, indeed, the ‘total abolition of the state’ but rather the delegation of the functions currently associated with large states to the community or homeland level, together with the freedom to carry out those functions however they wish. What is being abolished is not government but rather supra-community government, imperialistic government, and the imposition of ideology upon unwilling communities (the latter being something that the likes of Bakunin are evidently happy to contemplate). And this, surely, is the great strength of national anarchism (i.e. an anarchism of ‘nations’ or ‘homelands’ or ‘communities’ -- an anarchism that liberates communities from imposed government) rather than the classical anarchism that purports to work at the individual level but, in practice, would not work at all.
So what we have here is the author of this website admitting that this form of "anarchism" is -not- the abolition of the state.  We further have this same author rejecting "classical anarchism" as not working at all, i.e. rejecting anarchism itself.  Indeed, in other parts of the text the author claims that classical anarchism is not even anarchistic.  As such, it could not possibly be more clear that this form of "anarchism" does not follow from anarchist tradition, does not hold common definitions for what anarchism is, and most certainly is not appropriate for an article whose primary concern is to explicate a philosophy that is -undeniably- concerned with the abolition of the state.  Whether or not national anarchism deserves its own webpage, given that it would constitute entirely original research and insignificant numbers of subscribers (who in the words of the author are "highly secretive"), and constitutes a recent internet based phenomena, is itself a seperate question.  But the question of whether or not it is appropriate to link to on this page is already answered in the words of this individual himself.  I will continue to remove any attempts to import this.  Kev 02:42, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  National 'anarchism' 

message: Seriously. The arguments above here are good and all, but they established the conflict and below this line we're trying to resolve it. (I know I've been posting a lot, adding to the mess--no job for the last three weeks) I bet the server admins hate us. Do I hear a second? --albamuth 09:00, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we archive the above?
Talk:Alexander Tcherepnin

message: There are at least four different ways to spell this composer's name in Roman letters. These are the most common, followed by total of Google results.
Alexander Tcherepnin ~39600
Aleksander Tcherepnin 775
Alexander Tcherepnine 733
Aleksander Tcherepnine 64
I've made redirects for the second and third most common. Volunteer Sibelius Salesman 17:51, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Grove gives his birthdate as 8/21 Jan 1899, with the 8 being the Old Style date. But the 21 is one day off from the date given in the article. Volunteer Sibelius Salesman 18:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Grove's "8/21 Jan" is fundamentally flawed.  That suggests a 13-day difference between the calendars, but in the 19th century, they were only 12 days apart, not 13.  So it was either 8/20 Jan or 9/21 Jan.  If we can trust the Tcherepnin Society, then it was 9/21 January.  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small birthdate discrepancy 
Talk:Corporate Airlines Flight 5966

message: The NTSB report link may need to be updated as the report is updated... NTSB links tend to move when they update. Joblio 01:25, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Berserker probe

message: I'm thinking that rather than cleanup, this article might be best served by merging it back into von Neumann probe as a subsection of that article. There's a great deal of duplication between the two. Bryan 01:28, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: It has been speculated that the entire galaxy could be sterilized in this way in as little as half a million years. ... the galaxy? --Abdull 14:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Milky Way, presumably, just like when people say "the sun" to mean our Sun. :) I'll fix it. Bryan 15:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Galaxy
Talk:BMT West End Line

message: There is no link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Subway from this page.
:We're getting there... --SPUI (talk) 01:51, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternately, Template:sofixit --SPUI (talk) 01:56, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: In addition to what is listed in the article, I'd want to add that on February 25, 2005, walking along 86th street between 21st and Bay Parkway I mentioned some parked GM New Look (Fishbowl) Bus, along with some prepared moview cameras light projectors, etc. I guess they were prepared to take some night movie scenese, under the WEst End Line
*What movie was it (answer on my discussion page, please)
GK tramrunner 00:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: In Films

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :IND West End Line and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 4#IND West End Line until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Epicgenius (talk) 21:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "IND West End Line" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:12P/Pons–Brooks

message: I have an original picture of what i believe is the pons-brooks comet from 1954 ... How can i verify this
thanks -- 9 February 2005‎ 68.238.149.3
:I know this is over a decade late. But if it is a family-taken photograph, it would be "original research" and unfit for inclusion here... in its raw form.
:Which isn't to say it's not of interest. I for one would love to see it. You might want to publish this elsewhere and then have the publisher grant permission to wikipedia to reproduce it. You would be able to verify if your comet is 12P by showing your comet's position amongst the starfield, and then finding out where 12P's position was, as of 1954. --Zimriel (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Uploading an own work or an unpublished family photo is no way original research and of course is acceptable (see WP:IUPC), but the uncertainity around correct indentification could be an issue for its usage. C messier (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture(?)

message: Maik Mayer has positively identified this comet with the historic comets of 1385 and 1457. The new orbit was published in CBET 4727 (here (paywall), also see here). The identification with comets from 1313 and 1668, mentioned in the Wikipedia article, is wrong: The 1313 comet does not fit, and the 1668 event was not even a comet. Renerpho (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1668 comet said to have been seen by Europeans is another unrelated object, C/1668 E1. Renerpho (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

text: The last perihelion , and the corresponding note 1, is also about this different object. Most of the article's "Discovery" section is completely wrong and better be rewritten from scratch.Renerpho (talk) 20:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I added back the claim in the article, as it was published in a peer reviewed journal, but added also the remarks of Maik Mayer concerning those comets. --C messier (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identified with comets C/1385 U1 and C/1457 A1 - not with comets of 1313 or 1668 

message: Although this study had its findings published in the news, it was never published in a peer reviewed journal but only in arXiv, which mentions that Materials on this site are not peer-reviewed by arXiv. Preprints aren't reliable sources. Given the extraordinary of the claim, I suggest removing it completely from the article as based on unreliable sources. C messier (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonilla's comet speculation 

message: The perihelion maximum has passed, and now has to be updated to the next one. RuduskaMuduska (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perihelion
Talk:Teochew cuisine

message: I see that a previous discussion has been carried out on this, but no changes appeared to have been done. I think that the title for this article should be "Teochew Cuisine" instead of "Chiuchow Cuisine" simply because the term "Teochew" is well... Teochew and "Chiuchow" is Cantonese. Makes sense to name the cuisine in it's own dialect... no?
Silverelf (talk) 19:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Teochew Cuisine vs Chiuchow Cuisine

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem