lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Archer Avenue lines

message: When I was redesigning and testing the signaling for the Archer Avenue Extension for Union Switch & Signal, I noticed some interesting attributes on the drawings and in the tunnels at Van Wyck Blvd. I walked the tunnels many times in 1986 and 1987 and found the following: 
1) The entire grade separated tunnels for tracks D1A and D2A were built as part of the Queens lines contract under Public Works Administration (PWA) project No. 2741 in 1935 and 1936. The original tunnel lighting was installed and operative. They were called tracks D5 and D6 in the 1935 and were destined to go the Rockaways. 
2) The tunnel was built originally from Van Wyck Blvd. to the middle of the present interlocking at Jamaica-Van Wyck. 
3) When the Archer Avenue Extension was added the original tunnel was left original except for the addition of ties and track. 
At Parsons-Archer, the tail track goes under the LIRR to allow for a several train storage. We provided rear home signals and red automatic signals with AK feature on these tail tracks. A Central Instrument Room (753CIR) is located deep in the tunnel on track D2A bench wall.  --96.250.192.111 (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archer Avenue Extension 

message: A real interesting paragraph:
"The original plan also called for the  train to continue along the right of way of the Atlantic Branch of the Long Island Rail Road through the Locust Manor and Laurelton stations. The Montauk Branch through St. Albans already provides parallel service to Jamaica. This conversion would have involved modifying existing platforms at Locust Manor and Laurelton to accommodate the IND loading gauge, as well as constructing new stations to serve Southeast Queens. Due to a lack of funding, this plan was never implemented."
I don't know about the rest of you, but this seems like it might've also created the potential to reopen a lot of former LIRR stations along both the Atlantic and Montauk Branches. I imagine if the E train was extended, we'd have articles along there like Higbie Avenue (IND Locust Manor Line), and Cedar Manor (IND Locust Manor Line), and stations like Springfield Gardens (LIRR station) would be reactivated. Although I keep thinking the Archer Avenue-Locust Manor connection would've required some southwestern jughandle. ----DanTD (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: But it's not open, so all we can do is hope that the MTA would complete the project in the future. Epicgenius(talk to me • see my contributions) 13:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond Jamaica Center
Talk:Argentine station

message: This article was quite correctly tagged for copyright evaluation in February 2010 when a contributor noticed similarities between it and the website at . However, investigation suggests (as unlikely as it seems) that they copied the information from us.
Tellingly, the information was entered here with subtle differences from its current text. Note that the last sentence says, "The metro, of course, takes its name from the street." It was months before somebody came in and changed it to read "The Métro station takes its name from the street." The external site uses the language that was introduced into the article later. 
Also tellingly, the next metro in the list of that external site uses language from another Wikipedia article, introduced here by evidently yet another user. It seems very likely that this list (for which I can find no archive) compiled its information from various Wikipedia articles. 
I very much appreciate the editor who brought it up for review. The Wikimedia Foundation takes copyright concerns very seriously, and we want to do all we can to ensure that the content used on Wikipedia is legally ours to display. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns
Talk:Arsenal tube station

message: The 'Platform Art' images of memorable moments in Arsenals history have long been removed. I think the paragraph on this should be removed as it is of no encyclopedic value. Any objections? (HighburyVanguard 22:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it could be shortened into a single sentence, and folded into the article about the club's departure from the area. I don't think it is totally unencyclopaedic, given the club's connection to the area, but others may disagree. Qwghlm 23:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually on second thoughts you can go ahead and delete it, I couldn't find a way of writing it in a single sentence that didn't look like crap. I'm not too fussed, as it happens, I just don't like deleting things from articles with no explanation in the edit summaries. Qwghlm 23:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Surely it's more the case that Drayton Park - and the whole Finsbury Park-Moorgate branch - is closed on weekends, regardless of whether there is a match on or not? Nick Cooper (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, I've updated the article to reflect this. Qwghlm (talk) 09:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drayton Park 

message: What about West Ham?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.27.252.237 (talk) 10:24, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't move to their current ground until 1904, and the station opened in 1901. So, no. Britmax (talk) 14:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides which, West Ham station is named after the town of West Ham, which was there some 650 years before railway and 700 years before football. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arsenal not the only tube station named after football club
Talk:Arts-Loi metro station

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 21:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Kunst-Wet/Arts-Loi metro station →  – I am starting a move request to retitle this article to its French name, and as such bring it in line with all the other stations of the Brussels Metro, as per the Brussels naming convention established back in 2007 on WP:BELG (see Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3). In short, the consensus back then in Brussels articles was to use only a single name without any separators (e.g. "/") for clarity, choosing either the French or Dutch alternative (or an English form when existant) depending on the most common usage. Although I am a big defender of Brussels' bilingual status, as far as English Wikipedia is concerned, this role nearly always falls on the French form (that language being by far the most commonly spoken one in the region). I have already manually changed the other stations' names (when required) to meet the above-mentioned criteria. However, this particular article and Maalbeek/Maelbeek metro station are blocked from further moves, leading to both articles' bilingual names remaining as somewhat of an anomaly. I also started a move request on that other article's talk page. Jason Lagos (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per WP:TITLECON RectoVersus (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 April 2023
Talk:Arts et Métiers station

message: I removed  from the bottom of the page.. Of course, this station of the Paris' subway IS in the Ile de France region, but come on ! I think we should keep that template for articles concerning the region directly (economy, geography, population, etc.)
Otherwise, we might as well add to this article all the possible templates .. "paris subway line 3 stub", "paris subway stub", "paris stub", "Ile de france stub", "france stub", "europe stub" ... :)
FiP Как вы думаете? 15:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IledeFrance-geo-stub
Talk:Avenue U station (BMT Brighton Line)

message: Thanks for fixing the opening date in this edit. Could you possibly add the citations for this earlier opening date, even if the newspapers aren't online? Thanks. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, KG. Thanks for asking, even though it made me get off my lazy ass and do more research (which is not a bad thing). The first mention I could find of Homecrest (Avenue U) Station as a station is the Brooklyn Daily Eagle of 22 Aug 1902, so c.1902. But the lazier development went like this: (1) we know that 1908 is wrong because that is the station on the new embankment; (2) we knew there was the surface station at the beginning of 1906 (which was when shoo-fly construction began, because the BGCEG took a picture of it (B148), so we can accurately say "before 1906"; most of the current stations of the surface line were open by 1902, so 1902 was an educated guess, and it happens to be the right on. Cecropia (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Aviation/LAX station

message: Hello. Can someone please fix where the final destination is on the Green Line Aviation/96th Branch? It currently says towards Redondo Beach. Can someone please fix this, so the information on Aviation / LAX (Los Angeles Metro station) will be correct? Thanks. 71.198.231.208 (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Line Aviation/96th Branch Has Wrong Western Terminus
Talk:Athletics at the 1932 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metres

message: Info is duplicated in a much more convenient form on that page.  We can just have this one redirect there. --David Mestel(Talk) 06:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the author has raised no objections, even to a message on his talk page, I'm going to go ahead an make this and similar articles into redirects. --David Mestel(Talk) 07:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Spondylolisthesis

message: I've moved the terminology to be mentioned first, since it is otherwise confusing when the text goes on to describe "anterolisthesis" in an article titled "Spondylolisthesis". As per Talk:Spondylolisthesis#Rewrite, it orients the viewer. It is also related to classification, and should thus be mentioned initially as per MEDMOS#Content sections. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology first 

message: Hello everyone. My colleague and I are medical students that will soon be entering into Radiology residency. We are taking on this page due to personal interest and experience in the subject. The article has a great foundation that we will be expanding and adding onto. Below is the general outline of the article with our plan. Please let us know if anyone has any input or information they would like to see more of.
 -Introduction - added some introductory information on spondylolisthesis to allow for the article to better flow
 -Types  (none)
 -Anterolisthesis
     -Signs and symptoms - plan to make a more clear cut signs and symptoms outline.
     -Classification - leave as is, potentially add a few references
         -By causes
         -By location
         -Severity 
    - Physical (NEW) - add physical exam findings from a medical professional standpoint
     -Imaging (NEW) - Radiographic finds of spondylolisthesis including:
         -Plain Radiograph
         -CT
         -MRI
     -Treatment 
         -Conservative - add current literature review of new non-operative management 
         -Surgical - added indications of surgical intervention, as well as expand on newer surgical techniques and methodology.
     -Differential 
 -Retrolisthesis (expand)
--Cdsleeth (talk) 19:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Expansion
Talk:Balboa Park station

message: The reason given for Balboa Park to be a transfer station instead of Daly City,
Although all four BART lines that pass through the station currently continue southward to Daly City, the Balboa Park Station design offers passengers transfers between trains without having to change platforms.
is not a valid reason, because, if passengers were transferring between trains in the same direction, they would not have to change platforms at either Balboa Park or Daly City (in Daly City, they have two platforms, a side platform with one track for southbound trains, an island platform with two tracks for northbound trains; in both cases, each direction is served by only one platform). And if they were transferring between trains in opposite directions, it would make no sense for them to transfer at Balboa Park (they would transfer at the soonest station where the lines were shared, to avoid travelling an extra distance). --208.80.119.67 (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's actually incorrect, at Daly City, SFO-bound trains use Platform 1. The (formerly-Southbound) trains that terminate at DC use Platform 2. To change between Platform 1 and 2 requires going downstairs at P2 and upstairs at P1. 108.94.167.69 (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Baltimore Metro SubwayLink

message: Have you all seen this?
Template:Baltimore Light Rail Diagram
main template Wikipedia:Route diagram template
AWESOME! I'm working on it here... Feel free to help: --Eplack
By hand this is hard...
:I'm the one who made the light rail template -- thanks for the kind words!  I actually also made a Metro template as well (you can see it here) but decided not to overwrite the existing color line map template created by User:Dkendr.  If there's consensus that the German-style table is better, though, you're welcome to use mine as a basis (I know there's stuff that's been left out). --Jfruh (talk) 15:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally like the German style one better, and thanks to Jfruh for implementing it! How did you do it? (by hand or with a program)...--Eplack (talk) 17:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  German train wikitable 

message: Now that this article has been renamed, we should probably rename the station articles so the parenthetical disambiguators read (Baltimore Metro Subway station) instead of (Metro Subway station) which is pretty ambiguous. I moved Owings Mills, but wanted input before continuing. oknazevad (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station articles 

message: The new hitachi cars were delivered today (Sep 14), article should mention Wikimeln (talk) 02:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cars
Talk:Barking station

message: This was highlighted in British Railways - Progress dated May 1962  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleakcomb (talk • contribs) 03:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs citing properly 
Talk:Barkingside tube station

message: Almost all the external links do not work - please amend  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AsparagusTips (talk • contribs) 09:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed Beary, seem to go nowhere! Modified LT archive link (1953). best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What zone was the station in prior to  2 January 2007? Jackiespeel (talk) 22:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: if I recall correctly, the northern/eastern portion of the Hainault loop was in zone 5, with the southern/western portion in zone 4. One of the boundary stations was Woodford, but which the other boundary station was, I don't recall. Nowadays, the whole loop is in zone 4. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Newbury Park. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Travelcard Zones

message: The road is not called Station Road but rather Station Approach.  The cul-de-sac information is true but the cul-de-sac lies *off* Station Road and is not actually part of it.AsparagusTips (talk) 21:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Basilique de Saint-Denis station

message: Quoth the article:
The station opened in 1976 at the same time as lines 13 and 14 were linked across Paris.
That can't be right ... Line 14 didn't open until the late 90s... --Jfruh (talk) 17:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a reference to old line 14, now part of line 13.--Grahame (talk) 15:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Line 14?
Talk:Bay Parkway station (IND Culver Line)

message: Maybe this could be a good addition to the text? https://www.derix.com/en/portfolio-items/mta-station-bay-parkway-mcdonald-ave-station-leslie-wayne-new-york-city-2 - SimonMüller87 (talk) 15:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neptunes Garden?
Talk:Bayfront MRT station

message: Hi. I'm just curious, is there any way to edit the database such that the terminus for Circle Line Extension will show "Terminus" instead of "towards HarbourFront"? As far as extensions are concerned, I'm quite sure that the termini should be where the branch line meets the main line. I could be wrong though, can someone clarify? Steel Bow (talk) 11:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, trains will not terminate at Promenade but instead journey to HarbourFront, so to label it as a termini is factually incorrect in a sense. Seloloving (talk) 17:40, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminus for Circle Line Extension 
Talk:Bayswater tube station

message: It is not clear to most readers what the special connection is between Bayswater and Inverness Terrace, although the impression is given that it is something to do with the Forsyte Saga by John Galsworthy. This is not the way Wikipedia articles should be written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.39.65 (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bayswater connection
Talk:Bayview station (Toronto)

message: This article has been edited to conform with a standard scheme for subsections in TTC station Wiki pages proposed here: Talk:Toronto_subway_and_RT#Individual_Station_articles_-_a_standard_scheme_for_subsections  —Preceding unsigned comment added by A.Roz (talk • contribs) 01:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits - 29 June 2009
Talk:Beaudry station

message: How come this dose not say the station is temporarily closed!?!
http://www.stm.info/en/info/service-updates/stm-works/beaudry
MrTrains227 21:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What!?!
Talk:Becontree tube station

message: 'The station is haunted at night with LU staff seeing a woman in white who has no face.'
seems like this should be changed to 'LU staff have reported seeing...' or somesuch, but i couldn't find anything relevant when searching the web for 'Becontree haunted'.  is there a citation for this? Mathtinder 01:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's this about haunted? 

message: I think the level of detail about LTSR given here is too much for an article about one station and it should be in the article on the line (probably already is).
However, I am questioning the point about "a direct route between the two cities". What two cities? London is the only city on the line. Southend may get city status in 2022 but that can hardly be what the author means.--82.47.135.239 (talk) 03:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  LTS Railway
Talk:Bedford–Nostrand Avenues station

message: "They [the tracks underneath the G Train] are used for train storage, although they [referring to the same subject] are not normally used for that purpose."  I didn't want to fix it, because I'm not sure which it is. Bolwerk 22:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake
Talk:Bedok MRT station

message: An image used in this article, File:Bedok MRT Station platform A.JPG, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Fastily for the following reason: No license since 30 April 2011
;What should I do?
	A different bot should have (or will soon) remove the image code from the article text (check if this has been done correctly). If you think the image deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons. You could also try to search for new images to replace the old one.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 00:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bedok MRT Station platform A.JPG Deleted
Talk:Belgrave Walk tram stop

message: Just now using TfL Journey Planner to go to Merton I noticed that TfL (who have exact specifications for all signage and publicity material) have "Wimbledon Tram Stop" but "Belgrave Walk Tram Station", and that, despite the fierce WP changing of all "Croydon Tramlink" to "Tramlink" even for past events when it really was "Croydon Tramlink", JP refers to "Croydon Tramlink". Can anyone explain or justify?--SilasW (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Belmont station (CTA North Side Main Line)

message: Someone who knows how should disambiguate the link to Addison (CTA) at the bottom of the page so that it points to Addison (CTA Red Line). Reub2000 12:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating addison link? 

message: Is Belmont (CTA Brown Line) really the best name for this article? The Red Line and the Purple Line Express also stop here. Eco84 | Talk 22:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Belsize Park tube station

message: Is it true that there are 219 steps? I know that's what the signs say, but I only ever count 211. Could someone check? 129.215.149.98 (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of steps 
Talk:Bergen Street station (IND Culver Line)

message: Hi there!
I noticed there is no attribution to the sentence that says the lower level is too expensive to repair. I’m curious because this would
be good information to have. I will search and add if I can find anything, but I’m throwing this question out there too. Gnarrioch (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is cited in the article. This is the source.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for high costs of Lower Level repair?
Talk:Bernauer Straße (Berlin U-Bahn)

message: thumb|Bernauer Straße (Berlin U-Bahn) 
The text reads "" but its description on Commons says "". So is this station or Nordbahnhof? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this sign for this station?
Talk:Halo 2 Vista

message: I moved Halo 2 Vista to its own article so it can be expanded--Link287 18:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Started new article

message: I removed the section about the petition for Halo 2 for XP. Please read this. Wikipedia is not for advertising. Jamesr66a 18:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Petition

message: Do you think it's ok to add a controversies section to the article?
-Partial Nudity Delay
-Does not include Tombstone and Desolation Maps
-Games for Windows - Live can only be accessed in game.
etc.
or are these just minor things?
Dr1v3thru 01:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversies
Talk:Bessarion station

message: This article has been edited to conform with a standard scheme for subsections proposed here: Talk:Toronto_subway_and_RT#Individual_Station_articles_-_a_standard_scheme_for_subsections
Photos of the Concord construction site were removed as this page contains quite a few photos, and those are more suitable for the development's wiki page. A.Roz (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits - 30 June 2009 