Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Cheeses task force

message: I just added  to this project and to all relevant cheese articles in the United Kingdom. I have a question. I have only added unique cheese types but have steered clear of branded cheeses such as Cathedral City Cheddar. I think that is the right thing to do. What I am unsure of is whether to include unique brands such as Huntsman cheese, which is a combination of two cheeses sold under a brand name, or Applewood cheese which is a variation of Cheddar, but is not branded. Advice would be welcome. --TimTay (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK cheese template 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Today I began an article on this cheese.  Just FYI. Seduisant (talk) 19:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cazelle de Saint Affrique 

message: I note that that this taskforce's page states that where article names may be ambiguous the "Manual of Style method is to append "cheese", in parenthesis, to the article name (eg. Pont-l'Évêque (cheese)‎, from the French town of Pont-l'Évêque)". This isn't true. The MoS actually states that the use of parentheses is the "most common" method of disambiguating pages with exactly the same common name, not that it is mandatory or actually the best way. This group's use of parentheses actually contradicts the guidelines at WP:COMMONNAME. "XXX (cheese)" is not the common name for any cheese. For most, simply appending "cheese" after the district or type name is a much better method and produces a neutral, descriptive name that is far more logical and intuitive (most people will put "XXX cheese" into the search box, after all, while I'm fairly confident that none will type "XXX (cheese)"). This follows the common and sensible practice adopted for most other foodstuffs, such as Cumberland sausage and steak and kidney pie. I propose removing this misleading guideline from the taskforce page and slowly making the transition to more intuitive article names as people have time to fix redirects. Pyrope 17:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this, some cheeses have the name "cheese" or equivalent always attached to them.  Ie: Oaxaca Cheese.  It is Oaxaca Cheese in English and the Spanish equivalent (the language of the country it originates from).  This seriously needs to be reconsidered as it confuses the commonly known name with the name given to it by a small taskforce in the name of standarization. For example, Italian sausage wouldn't be retitled Italian (sausage), Superman -> Super (man), Cuban espresso -> Cuban (espresso) and Coca-cola -> Coca (cola)/Coca-cola (cola).  Its part of the name of the foodstuff, not just a description.  Anyhow, If this is not addressed, I plan to bring it up at ANI. --nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 06:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No real need for ANI, that's what this talk page is for. Unless anyone opposes the change in the next, ooh, let's say two days, just go ahead and make the change. Pyrope 16:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Work's for me. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 08:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As re-written, I can agree with it. --nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 17:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

text: I have restored those article names I could find from "Foo (cheese)" to "Foo cheese". SilkTork *YES! 09:29, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Common sense prevails. --Simple Bob (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misreading the MoS - Parentheses in article names 

message: Should a cheese's name always be used in upper case in its article? I contend that it should, so Cheddar cheese (or Brie, or Camambert)  is always referred to as "Cheddar" within the body of the article and is not reduced to lower case if not at the start of a sentence. It is a proper name for a product and should always be in upper case. Do the members of this taskforce concur? --Simple Bob (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Any cheese that takes its name from a place should be capitalized, that is old-fashioned grammar. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 00:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. So Cheddar, Cheshire, Camembert, etc. should be in upper case, but cottage and feta cheeses should not. --Simple Bob (talk) 15:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Case of cheese name within body of article

message: I've added a list of about 800 foods, including many cheeses, to the Ark of Taste article. Ark of Taste is a catalogue of endangered foods from Slow Food International. Many of the foods listed are red linked. Some just need to be disambiguated, but others could use articles if anyone feels up to creating them. The lists on the article can be sorted and cheeses are found under cheeses and dairy products. There's a category for the foods as well at :Category:Ark of Taste foods. Gobonobo T C 13:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite a few of the red links exist despite there being articles in existence because the wrong link is used e.g. Gloucester Cheese instead of Gloucester cheese. While I applaud your work in doing this, a little more care would avoid some of this. I have corrected the UK ones. --Simple Bob (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ark of Taste

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Cheeses articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheeses articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: Hello, I started categorizing some cheeses before I saw you had a cheese task force set up. If anyone has any comments at Talk:Washed-rind_cheese, I'd be happy to hear from you. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washed-rind vs Smear-ripened 

message: I've started a collaboration page for food articles, located at User:Northamerica1000/Food articles. All editors in good standing should feel free to contribute there and work together to improve food-related articles. Check it out! Northamerica1000(talk) 22:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food article collaboration 

message: Here's an article submission you might want to check out. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfC submission 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Is it possible for this article to be increased from stub status? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhena  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Platypusrock (talk • contribs) 02:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chhena