Talk:Randy Barnett

message: This guy is not *that* important to warrant an article of this length and depth. This reeks of self-promotion.
Daveman 84 14:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Notable, reliable sources reference his work. I would, however, say that more third-party sources should be added to support the assertion of Barnett's notability. I would also so that this article is not particularly "deep" in its examination of the subject. I am not sure what you think would be appropriate. If you think this article should be deleted as non-notable, feel free to nom it for deletion at WP:AfD. I doubt the community would agree, though. And, for the record, I emailed Barnett for permission to use the image we have of him, and he did not know about this article prior to that contact. DickClarkMises 17:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-promotion? 

message: Way too much info for a bio  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.67.84 (talk) 23:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill of Federalism should be split into its own article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Randy Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090530094100/http://www.federalismamendment.com:80/about.html to http://www.federalismamendment.com/about.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Randy Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080827182413/http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/118/April05/RosenkranzFTX.pdf to http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/118/April05/RosenkranzFTX.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Randy Barnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090612081036/http://federalismamendment.com/billoffederalismfinal.pdf to http://federalismamendment.com/billoffederalismfinal.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The bibliography page does not include some of Barnett's more recent works. It also doesn't include any of Barnett's articles on contract theory, which might be useful given that contract theory features as one of the article's headings. Would it be useful to include some of these in the bibliograpy?
APG2000 (talk) 02:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography? 

message: Section "Repeal Amendment" describes a proposal that 2/3 of the States have power to undo Federal acts.  Under the "Bill of Federalism", the required fraction is 3/4.  Did Barnett change his mind? —Tamfang (talk) 04:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  repeal ratio