lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Python 3

message: Hey, guys...you're just restating the main Python article. The entire Philosophy section has nothing to do with the next version of the language, it's just reiterating everything about Python itself. The Python 3 article has to be about that version of the language. 209.92.136.131 14:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; see all the discussion above. :)  --Piet Delport 14:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wtf 

message: in my view, the whole timeline section is basically taken word for word off of the timeline section in the python 3.0 part of the python website, [www.python.org] (written by guido himself). though the document has been put in the public domain, i think it would still be best to cite it.
:-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernsteinp (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: citation

message: Please don't call it "Python 3". That name is not used anywhere else. Python 3000 is the project "code name", its abbreviation is Py3k, and the formal release is Python 3.0. Nobody uses "Python 3" to describe the project except for this wikipedia entry.  (And agreed with all the other comments about not repeating the main "Python" page.)  Gvanrossum 17:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What should we use as this page name?  I suggest "Python 3000".  Python 3.0 does not exist yet, and when it does (i.e., when Python 3.0 is the most current generally available release), I assume that all the features about 3.0 will simply be placed into the main Python article. Terry Carroll 18:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't use "Python 3" as the title, please 

message: Really... it looks ugly.  Put all references inside <ref> tags, and give raw URLs more descriptive link names.  Pretty please. LotLE×talk 18:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed reference style is bad
Talk:Katy Harris (Coronation Street)

message: I saw the episode where Katy died, and I have a query. Diabetes U.K., incidentally, the U.K.'s leading diabetes charity,  were quite positive about how diabetes was depicted on "Coronation Street". However, in a former episode, Katy had passed out, and a nurse said that this was NOT due to lack of insulin, but to  eating too much sugar. Is this medically accurate? I am NOT a qualified diabetologist, but my understanding is that to   faint due to ketoacidosis after eating excess amounts of sugar when one has diabetes mellitus is unlikely, PROVIDING THE DIABETIC HAS INJECTED SUFFICIENT amounts of insulin. I shall appreciate any comments from medically qualified contributors to Wikipedia on this. ACEO 08:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Diabetics have characteristic (but not inevitable) reactions to surplus sugar (especially in large amounts) depending on type. Because of individual variations, it's not possible to say that this or that always happens when blood sugar levels become very high. However, it is not beyond possibility that any diabetic whose sugar levels are very high will have what is called hyperosmotic diabetic coma, and pass out. Both lack of sugar, nad far too much sugar can have an unconsciousness effect. That said drinking sugar wate is an exceptionaly silly way to commit suicide as there are so many other more efficient and surer methods. but that was a concern for the script writers, not a medical judgement. Ketoacidosis is not usually a cause of fainting, as the brain typically continues to function up the point of multiple organ failure from the acidosis. Riveted by discomfort and distress to be sure, but still functioning. Perhaps that helps clarify the diabetic side of things? ww 16:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:George of the Jungle

message: There appears to be no on-screen credit for the voice actors at the end of an episode.
There are credits for producers, directors, animators, background design, etc but no voices.
I am seeing this on the home video release, but are the episodes there any different than the original broadcast versions?
Jszigeti (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice Credits 

message: I think we should make a different article for the 2007 series. Uknownson (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is enough unique info about the 2007 series to warrant a separate article. -- BullWikiWinkle 03:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 

message: It should be mentioned that in a Tom Slick cartoon, one of the racers is a Canadian Mountie called Roy L. Mountie, whose character design became the look of Dudley Do-Right. 2001:1970:5EE8:2CF1:8DB6:B0D9:B1D4:49AF (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect it's the other way around. Dudley Do-Right first appeared in 1961, on Jay Ward's previous series, "The Bullwinkle Show." Jhlechner (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roy L. Mountie 

message: The article currently asserts that George's appearance was inspired by weightlifter George Eiferman. There are scores of citations online for this, but most of them lead back to this article. I haven't found any authoritative basis for this claim. I don't want to delete it without proof to the contrary, but I have to say that I'm skeptical. Jhlechner (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Eiferman
Talk:Dolly grip

message: I honestly think that jib / crane ops occupy a seperate world entirely, since their specialization requires familiarity with an entirely different set of equipment.  It's like saying that since both grip and lighting departments have stands, they're the same thing.  Sure, some dollies have hydraulic arms, but that's not going to put them in the same world as a guy behind a technocrane, right?
---
Crane ops are definately a distinct specialization, but they are definately grips. When I dayplay a crane, I will put my dolly grip on the base when the crane is on track. Dolly grips and crane ops are brothers, where electricians are cousins, you follow?  That said, I think crane ops should have thier own stub in Wikipedia.  Even brothers need thier own rooms...
---
UH I THINK THIS PAGE NEEDS AN EDIT (See Reference about a "Game" in the article...)
---
Actually, on feature films (Ive done over 60) and television shows, the A Dolly Grip is also the crane operator. Sometimes he will elect to turn it over to his B camera dolly grip just to get a break. When a Technocrane shows up, union rules define it as a grip operator job, normally the dolly grip although the crane tech (a camera local member strangely enough) may be asked to operate the "pickle" (the in and out switch). I do know Dolly Grips who operate the arm and the pickle at the same time (not easy)[] ( 17:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening up my heart
Talk:Lucretia Merces

message: Though 99% of the time an anonymous editor saying that someone is gay on Wikipedia is vandalism, I'm actually not so sure in this case.  Clearly Lelei is, uh, affectionate to Lucretia to an extreme degree, but in most of the game there isn't much indication that this is requited to the same degree.  That said, on the night before the Sol-Faleena siege, I think that Lucretia makes a hint that she'll be spending the night with Lelei, if I recall correctly.  So who knows?  The anon editor might well be right, actually, although I wouldn't put it as stridently as he or she did. SnowFire 19:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucretia's sexuality.
Talk:Non-explosive demolition agents

message: I have made this entry product neutral.  My ID is too new to rename this article.  Since I am a new user it seemed too complicated to list this on the rename page, and the rename should not be controversial anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsme2003 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Thanks for the changes you've made to the article!  Not only is it now a neutral description rather than an advertisement for a specific product, but it's also much more informative!  Good job! --Icarus 01:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is missing any description of how the substance actually works. Does it generate heat? Does it expand in volume? Does it corrode or dissolve the rock? What is the physical/chemical explanation for how it works?  What is its chemical composition? Reify-tech (talk) 04:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical composition
Talk:Smell the Glove

message: I appreciate that someone went to a lot of trouble literally writing down every single thing that happened in this one scene in This is Spinal Tap, but I'm not sure why. I put the  and  templates on the larger article because I am curious as to why it hasn't been incorporated into the article on the movie as was once suggested. Xenomorph erotica (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: All this from a 2 minute clip of a movie?

message: Of the two citations used here one goes to an image of the album cover with the title Bitch hosted on a fan's website and the other is Imdb, neither of qualifies as reliable, third-person sources. Xenomorph erotica (talk) 22:32, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to fan website

message: Only one album in this section actually does have a plain black sleeve.  The rest all have a significant amount of writing on the front. I think they should be removed. —Torc. (Talk.) 05:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Other black sleeves

message: Please update the redirect template to  to place redirect in the proper subcategory of :Category:Fictional element redirects to lists. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 16:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Michael Dawson (disambiguation)

message: Do we need a disambiguation page for 2 articles? I've edited the two articles to point to one another rather than to the disambiguation page, revert if you disagree of course.
I'm also wondering if the Michael Dawson character should be made the default article and the football player be moved to Michael Dawson (football). Not being British I have no idea how well-known the player is, but based simply on the fact the the character's article is twice as long I would suggest that this might be wise. I will not, however, make the move myself. --IntrigueBlue 09:43, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Herat Province

message: I note that this is entirely modern, referring only to the present-day happenings. the article on Herat itself covers much more - should this article not be similar? Peter Shearan 06:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: recent edits done by an anon IP is not considered clean up. He has removed sourced information and is pushing his POV like in any other article.--Inuit18 (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits 

message: The second sentence of this article says: "Together with Badghis, Farah, and Ghor provinces, it makes up the south-western region of Afghanistan." If the "south-western region" is some formal designation that I'm not aware of, then it should be capitalized. If not, then how can it include Badghis (along Afghanistan's northern border) but not Nimruz (as far southwest as you can actually go in the country)? 74.71.94.218 (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southwest? 

message: I noticed  editing the ethnic composition of the Herat districts. All of them to an unlogical 99% Tajiks composition. There are no sourced provided that support this claim neither does the referenced "source" of the user support this claim. You can use this talk page......--Casperti (talk) 17:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dear friend, I had like you to first thoroughly read the source that I have used. There is a language map that I have based the calculations from. If you disagree with the percentages thats fine but please first look at the language map before making any decisions. 1DHNK1 (talk) 10:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected ethnic-conflict editing 
Talk:Hermia

message: She is also a good childhood friend of Helena  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.179.156 (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment 1

message: Who the heck is "Maison Kelly"???85.76.98.199 (talk) 20:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody. It was nonsense someone had inserted into the article, and nobody seems to have noticed. Thanks for the catch, and in the future you should feel free to just remove such things yourself directly (just make sure it really is nonsense first). --Xover (talk) 05:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment 2
Talk:Minister of State

message: If we need the currently shown classification of countries (and I am not sure that we do), the heading which reads in Anglo-Saxon and other Commonwealth countries is inappropriate in my view. Neither Ireland nor India is an Anglo-Saxon country, and even in the United Kingdom it is only England that can (partly) be described as Anglo-Saxon. Furthermore, Ireland is neither Anglo-Saxon nor a member of the Commonwealth of Nations.
 
I know that some (especially speakers of French and other Romance languages) are wont to use "Anglo-Saxon" and its cognates as shorthand for "American and British", but in English the term really ought to be reserved for use in connection with the language and culture of pre-Conquest England.
The intention of the current heading is probably to refer to countries with parliamentary systems based on the Westminster model; if so, some better way needs to be found to make this reference. -- Picapica 10:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Captainj 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Fastifex reverted my change without discussion on the talk page.  In the edit summary he said "ministerial (executive!) ranks aren't linked to the legislature type as such".  Actually that statement is incorrect as for example under the Westminster system minister are normally members of the legislature.  Additionally Westminster system describes more than just the legislature (even if it is legislature focussed).  Captainj 22:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Many, and very belated*, thanks for sorting that out, Fastifex. (*Doesn't time fly!) -- Picapica (talk) 01:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Anglo-Saxon" countries 

message: Georgia (the country inthe Caucasus) also has the Minister of State. Doe you know what his constituional status is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Piotrnikitin (talk • contribs) 15:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgia 
Talk:Croatian Revolutionary Brotherhood

message: First of all the Brotherhood movent was to start an uprising agianst Yugoslavia to bring freedom to the Croatia. After that incident the Yugoslavia secret police said that were a bunch of terroists and that croats in general were terroists. But this is not true because after the incident the Yugoslavian secret police secrectly bomed the Sydney harbour in Australia to make Croatia look like terroists so that they were able to spy on Croatian people in Australia so that no more such uprising by the Croatians in Australia would happen. --Marbus2 5 10:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are listed on the List of designated terrorist organizations, which is one of the signal indicators that they are recognized by at least one government as a terrorist group. Most "freedom fighters" qualify as terrorists by that criteria. It is not necessarily intended as a prejudicial term. John Carter 19:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''They Werent Terrosits''' 

message: I removed the following from the article as unverified. I leave them here so that if someone can find citations from reliable sources that they were HRB actions, then they can add them back.
* Raid on the Yugoslavs' Club in Paris, 1966
* Assassination attempt on Yugoslav ambassador to Germany, 1966
* Assassination of superintendent in Yugoslav consulate in Stuttgart, 1966
* Sabotage attempt on the transmission line and railway Zagreb-Rijeka, 1967
* Plot to assassinate Josip Broz Tito, 1967
* Raid on the Yugoslav consulate in Melbourne, Australia, 1967
* Planning of bomb attacks on planes, buses and trains in order to disturb tourism in Yugoslavia, 1968
* Raid on a bar in Scheveningen, Netherlands. where Yugoslav consul organized Embassy Days
* Bomb attack at the cinema "22. Oktobar" in Belgrade; 1 person killed, 85 wounded
* Assassination attempt on Chief of the Yugoslav Military Mission in Berlin, 1969
* Assassination attempt of the Yugoslav vice-consul in Lyon, 1969
Peaceray (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified actions
Talk:Linwood, Renfrewshire

message: I don't see why this page is "Linwood" and not "Linwood, Scotland".  All the other Linwood pages are disambiguated, and this one does not seem to be more notable.  Linwood is also a common first name, and the number of "Linwood" pages exceeds the number listed on the disambiguation page by a large number (enter "linwood" in the search box and hit "Search").  If there are no objections, I will move this page to Linwood, Scotland, and make Linwood a disambiguation page featuring all articles with "Linwood" in the title, whether place names or not. Defixio 04:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Page 

message: I have to take issue about the redevelopment of the "old high rises" into more modern housing, since, as I type this, I appear to be floating about 70 feet up, on a visit to my Mum. The high flats, (Belmar and Asbury Courts) routinely have a major project carried out on an annual basis. This year, the lifts are being refurbished/replaced. (My Mother did a swan dive down the fire escape stairs a few weeks ago when she tried to take her walking frame with her, but luckily broke her fall with her head.) As far as I can tell, there are no plans to redevelop the flats.82.6.1.85 (talk) 23:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern History
Talk:Julian Fell

message: The articles Julian fell and Julian Fell are replicas. --soUmyaSch 10:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicates

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Docg 02:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Lavington, New South Wales

message: So why do we not class Hamilton Valley etc as separate suburbs. If anything I would have thought they are areas within Lavington, not suburbs of Albury. Where is the source for this and all the other articles on suburbs in Albury. I have lived here all my life and to every source I have ever encountered there only suburbs in Albury are... Albury, East Albury, West Albury, East Albury, South Albury, North Albury, Lavington and Thurgoona. Where do we stop if not for this? Every pocket of our 'burbs have names. and most wouldn't have any more than 500 residents. Danjd (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lavington is all of 2641...

message: Is there any point in mentioning the specific businesses in the shopping centre? It seems rather trivial to me. Graham 10:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lavington Shopping Centre

message: During the course of my doing up various Australian rules articles, I've noticed that a stub for Lavington Sports Ground has appeared over the past month; I'm planning to expand it by moving the para discussing it from here to there, since that seems a more appropriate place for it, but first I want to figure out the "proper" name for it, as it's been known by a number of different names over the years, and move it if needed, since "Lavington Sports Ground" doesn't ring true for me, it's been usually referred to as "Lavington Sports Club Oval" or "Lavington Panthers Oval" (since 2001) or just "Lavington Oval". Cricinfo refers to it as "Lavington Sports Oval" and I'm inclined to go with that.Graham 16:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lavington Sports Ground
Talk:Rodan (film)

message: "Unlike most of the Toho monster movies, which featured "action" scenes consisting of roaring monsters lumbering across the landscape at a stupefyingly slow pace"
Is it just me, or does this passage seem awfully condescending? Doesn't exactly sound very "neutral" to me.
: I agree, Controller. In fact the whole paragraph reads like completely personal opinion, and not really backed-up by the facts. It's been a while since I've seen Rodan, but I remember it as being a decent, entertaining film. But it didn't stand way out as far and away the greatest of the Toho monster movies, bar none, as seems to be implied here. Rizzleboffin 15:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the second paragraph (the one called "condescending" on this thread), and moved the third paragraph from the Plot section down to Trivia.  Also, Rodan is referred to as "Radon" when he appears in stock footage in the English dub of Terror of Mechagodzilla, so I corrected that reference as well.  Ljacone (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-corrected the reference in the Trivia to Rodan being called "Radon" in Terror of Mechagodzilla.  When Katsura is talking to her father about how he wants Titanosarus to be remembered, she refers to several monsters who have terrorized Japan, including King Ghidorah, Manda, and "mighty Radon." Ljacone (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section really needs an overhaul; the writer's English is poor and I don't see any sources listed. Any takers? Tony Myers 08:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section cleanup 

message: The synopsis section is shock full of opinions. "Surprisingly well-filmed", "the battle scenes and monster rampage in Rodan are thrilling, exciting, and fast-paced"... the hell? :3 ZombieLoffe (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis section
Talk:Illegal immigration to the United States

message: — Assignment last updated by PoMoncho (talk) 20:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LIBR 1 Working with Sources W

message: In the final paragraph of the intro, it says "These immigrants also disproportionately commit more crimes then legal citizens" but there appears to be no citation for this and the footnotes actually cite the opposite.  Why is this allowed in here? 2601:152:981:54B0:58EC:8347:27A9:148A (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "The footnotes actually cite the opposite". Which footnote? What pages in the footnotes you mean? Jc3s5h (talk) 22:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

text: I see that the material in question has been added to and reorganized in the last few days. I've removed the changes because it seems to go from saying that critics of immigration make certain claims, to saying the claims are true. Jc3s5h (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro lacking citations
Wikipedia talk:PCP

message: I've made this a disambig page instead of a redirect to WP:Pending changes. "PC" is the acronym most often used for Pending changes, and I don't remember seeing "PCP" being used in recent history. Also, a good percentage of the links to here are coming from the Pokemon collaborative project (which arguably has a better claim to PCP than pending changes). Rather than try to fix all the bad links and hatnotes, I decided to just make this a disambig page. This will also help cut down on the big ugly hatnotes. ~Adjwilley (talk) 00:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig