lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clive Barker's Undying

message: Okay, I've added some stuff to this page which hopefully are improvements. Notable among them are a references section with a couple references, a "Gameplay" section with "Multiplayer" subsection (which mentions the game's lack thereof), a critical response section, and I have moved some prose around to hopefully organize the article some more. A lot of this is still in "stub" form so if you can add anything (especially if is referenced) please do so.
The two biggest problems facing the page at this point IMO are still the excessively long "weapons" and "spells" lists and the general lack of appropriate citation - as pointed out in the tags at the top. -- Grandpafootsoldier 05:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added stuff

message: Should the full story be included here?
201.13.103.128 19:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lol Just realized this post is a year old.  nvm. Chronus Valtiel (talk) 07:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Story 

message: According to my copy of the game and the ESRB's Website, it is rated mature, so therefore, I am changing it. []  Edward4321 21:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rated Teen?

message: Both Gamespot and IGN say that the minimum and recommended RAM is 64MB and 128MB respectively, yet this article claims that the minimum RAM is 256 MB.  Is this an error, or do you know something they don't?  I'm going to go ahead and change it for now, unless, of course, things have indeed changed.  Chronus Valtiel (talk) 06:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible System Requirements Issue 

message: This article is poorly developed and improperly referenced, and needs to be expanded. There are several sources in the article's list of references that are improperly sourced and thus are just listed as numbers [1] - [7] instead of a proper footnote like the following: "Clive Barker's Undying". Revelations:the official Clive Barker resource. Retrieved November 23, 2006.. This should be fixed so that these citations are done correctly so that they appear properly in the article's list of references. The article also needs more information on the game's reception and release as these sections are way too short and need to be expanded with more reviews from critics and information on the game's sales. All of these changes need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards of a well developed and properly referenced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up, Expansion, and Referencing Errors
Template talk:PD-art-US

message: * These are some other image copyright tags that rely on Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.:
**  
** 
** 
* Also consider the tags listed at  
* Or the category Image copyright tags
Abecedare 17:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking for the right copyright tag?

message: Per discussion with User:Mikegodwin, the wording has been changed slightly. -- Avi (talk) 16:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quoting Bridgeman

message: It needs some instructions as it seems to be getting applied to a rather random selection of images. As best as I can figure out, it is for images which were created somewhere other than the US prior to 1923 (and thus are public domain in the US, but may not be elsewhere). Is that accurate? Kaldari (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What is this template for?
Talk:Latch (disambiguation)

message: Given the range of possible interpretations of the topic 'latch' I propose to create a disambiguation page and moving the material on this page to a new one called latch (electronic circuit), with an associated talk page that would carry all of the above. Any objections? Infilms 05:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this is a common policy on wikipedia. Alessio Damato 12:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I also agree. I think there's three main meanings of latch - Electronic Latch, Mechanical Latch (e.g. door latch) and to latch onto something (latch onto an idea/object). Rehnn83 14:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Discussion on electronic latch and associated discussion moved to Talk:Latch (electronic) Infilms 18:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page?
Talk:Natuna Regency

message: The Natuna Islands are out of the the limit of Chinese claim, no matter on PRC or ROC maps.  — Instantnood 15:49, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
There is a strange circular facility on Natuna-Besar Island. http://goo.gl/maps/rJfcg. Whatever it is, it's worth a mention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.213.24 (talk) 11:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll mention it in Infrastructure section or Demographic section, perhaps, @User:83.84.213.24. May be it will be more useful if you open your new account and upload some of the picture to :commons:Main Page. Cheers! Azmi1995 (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comment
Talk:Henry Hudson

message: 72.237.89.2 (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. casualdejekyll 13:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not protected at all 

message: Under heading "Expedition of 1609", 4th paragraph, last line: change "reaching a point about where the present-day capital of Albany is located" to "reaching a point near Kinderhook while the ship’s boat with a handful of crew members ventured to the vicinity of present-day Albany."
Citation: Collier, Edward Augustus, A History of Old Kinderhook from Aboriginal Days to the Present Time: Including the Story of the Early Settlers, Their Homesteads, Their Traditions, and Their Descendants; with an Account of Their Civic, Social, Political, Educational, and Religious Life, New York: G. P. Putnam's sons, 1914, 2-7, https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_History_of_Old_Kinderhook_from_Aborigi/GIY-AAAAYAAJ. Landfaraway (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In case you need additional evidence or citation, here is a link to a comprehensive article detailing all the evidence that Henry Hudson sailed the Half Moon only as far as Kinderhook while the ship's boat explored upriver to where present-day Albany is located: https://www.saugertieslighthouse.com/slc/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/HalfMoonandHudsonRiver.pdf Landfaraway (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: what i said Bhater13cm (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  we should unlock this 

message: remove the citation message Bhater13cm (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024
Template talk:Non-free USGov-USPS stamp

message: Not sure where to ask this question, but every stamp in :Category:USPS large-letter greetings stamps is used to illustrate the subject of the stamp not the stamp itself. 
Are the bullet points:
* to illustrate the stamp in question
AND
* on the English-language Wikipedia
Or is it:
* to illustrate the stamp in question 
OR
* on the English-language Wikipedia
Many of the copyrighted stamps that use this template are using the stamps to illustrate things appearing in the stamp's design, not the stamp itself despite the words on the template, is this proper usage simply because it is on the English-language Wikipedia? Thanks, --Dual Freq 13:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify fair use

message: The text of this template suggests that USPS images are easier to justify as fair use than other images, but policy says they have to pass the same NFCC criteria as everything else.
Either text or policy should change.  Example DRV where this is relevant: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 26. — Charles Stewart (talk) 14:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy
Talk:Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics

message: Before I say something stupid, wasn't Roger Penrose also Rouse Ball Professor (1973-1998)? JFW | T@lk 16:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Nigel Hitchin is Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics, Cambridge University, from 1994 to 1997 ;
Roger Penrose is Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics, University of Oxford, from 1973 , becoming Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics in 1998  , see also the dust jacket of his book _The Road to Reality_. Chanjim 08:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both Oxford & Cambridge have Rouse Ball Professors of Mathematics?
Talk:Dewar flask

message: Can we possibly get a picture for this? (unsigned comment made user:Audiodude)
*Done, I made the image so I can change it if anyone has suggestiong but I think it sufficiently assists with the article. Also, it's a bit large on the page but not overly and the image is tiny so it's not hard on bandwidth (5k). Vicarious 02:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  image
Template talk:PD-USGov-DOJ

message: See:
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/USA
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/All
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Public domain
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Deprecated
*Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Other --Timeshifter (talk) 18:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other image copyright tags
Talk:Zappa (Guilty Gear)

message: Uh, I really think that with 69.117.217.189's edits, the gameplay section is really going into way too much detail here. First of all, Wikipedia isn't supposed to have OMG MOVELISTS! here, and anyway, the gameplay section's really just supposed to be a short summary of what it's like, not an information overload. (I've put this on Johnny's talk page too.) --Yar Kramer 20:40, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay
Talk:List of The X-Files episodes

message: The Series Overview table is very broken. Here's a screenshot of what I see. Raywin42 (talk) 03:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Page just needed a purge; all fixed now. This was due to some recent edits over at Module:Series overview; if you ever see an article looking like this again, just add  to the end of the URL, go, and it'll fix itself. Alex|The|Whovian? 03:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken table 
Talk:Proposed Japanese invasion of Sichuan

message: I made some corrections, but some parts are still incomprehensible, unfortunately. --Macdyne73 14:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: I removed the following section, which had been cleanup tagged since May '05, from the article.  It appears to discuss the relation between Japanese plans for taking the offensive against Russia, and how these related to the Sichuan offensive, but until somebody who knows what's going on here comes along it should probably be out of the article.  --RobthTalk 05:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section removed from article 

message: This article needs some serious work.  I have no idea what some of these sentences mean.  It appears that some sections are copied directly from as yet unverified sources.  I'll do my best to clarify the links and improve the language of the article, but it's difficult when a sentence contains no verbs!  For example, from the second paragraph of the article:
Was an intended final, but failed operation of the Imperial Japanese Army to defeat the Chinese army in Central West China and thus conquer the sovereign nation.
So yeah.  More work needs to be done to translate this article into English. -Oatmeal batman 14:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect English

message: I don't understand what has happened to this article. There is a clean, informative and comprehensible version of this article dated 27 May 2006 (See here). It has since been replaced with something like a rough translation. If there is actually nothing wrong with the 27 May 2006 version I'd like to refer to it for future edits. Feathered serpent 10:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Older Version

message: Three of the referenced texts are by Chiang Wei-kuo, and one by Chiang Kai-shek. We need neutral secondary sources (recent ones preferred). For Chiang Kai-shek's adopted son to write a book with the title "How the Generalissimo Chiang Kai Shek Won the Chinese-Japanese Eight Years War,1937–1945" is self-serving and absurd, assuming it's a real book (I assume the title is translated since I get no Google search results for it). --Difference engine (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better references
Talk:Zwarte Piet

message: Not only was there an article on the controversy, it was deleted: :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Zwarte Piet and its contents moved into this article. Simply mentioning it in the lede is appropriate as there volumes of content on the controversy in the article. The lede should summarize the whole article, not just those that are appealing to those who want to show the "best side" of the subject. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish anon removing controversy from lede twice 

message: "The earliest known illustration of the character comes from an 1850 book by Amsterdam schoolteacher Jan Schenkman in which he was depicted as a black Moor from Spain."
The picture shows a figure. But where is the source for the claim that this figure was called Zwarte Piet in 1850? Zwarte Piet is an ancient form of bogey man, already mentioned in the 18. century and completely unrelated to the tradition of St. Nicholas. This connection didn't appear before the end of the 19. century. 217.70.206.102 (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In the next few months I will begin to update this knowledge. I developed a study and dissertation on this subject (from Leiden University) that has been under academic embargo for the last 10 years. The idea, representation, and character of Zwarte Piet can be traced back to the early Golden Age, through the existence of actual individuals (evidenced empirically by numerous depictions in royal archives as contextual data, and contemporaneous literature), and finally through a mediated refinement of objectification in the modern world. Openbridge (talk) 00:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zwarte Piet on the picture?
Talk:Girth

message: This pages clearly needs a rewrite - the whole text looks messy (covering graph theory and postal boxes.) Suggestions are welcome! Stdazi (talk) 11:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I separated the graph theory and postal box content, creating Girth (graph theory) to cover the math.  What's left, I kept on the disambig page.  It's not much more than a definition, though.  I'm thinking the definition should be removed, and all links to girth that don't refer to Girth (tack) or Girth (graph theory) should be unlinked. ~ Booya Bazooka 04:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Splitting it out like this seems ok to me. I added a little more to the graph theory article. I'm happy to leave the postal definition here, though: it's a mildly interesting factoid that (with the reference to Canada post) goes a little farther than a dicdef but seems difficult to expand into its own article. It's not really covered well by our wiktionary entry for girth, either. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite
Category talk:Nordic folk musical groups

message: People might wonder - why a nordic category instead of a Swedish, Finnish, Danish, Norwegian? We have common roots - then some countries have their own traditions as well, but nordic folk is a genre in record stores etc. There are also a few groups with mixed Finnish/Swedish, Finnish/Norwegian members.
I don't suspect this category will be extremely large either, so that is not a reason for doing one category for each country. /Habj 17:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Adam Kennedy

message: The picture has no information about who the baseball players are. --Numberonedad 17:23, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Rupert's Land

message: Where did this information come from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.123.84 (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Owned for 200 years by HBC

message: Does anyone know how much it was sold to Canada for?  I remember learning it in high school.  Considering it was the largest real estate deal in history, perhaps it's a good thing to know how much money was spent.
- Darkhawk (11 Mar, 2006 @ 13:49 EST)
: Rupert's Land Act of 1868, £300,000.00 (in 1870-value pound sterling).  --chris 21:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost?

message: The first paragraph of this section seems to be an account of someone's history thesis about the legal culture of the region. It may be of interest to other historians, but it seems starkly out of place here. I proposed deleting it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.56.42 (talk) 15:44, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Law section

message: This article is downright drunk with bias. Obviously written by Whig-minded historians, an outdated approach to history, even to those of European descent.  European based peoples just because they are white no longer write as if they are the centre of the universe. To declare as plain fact that Rupert's Land was ruled over by the Hudson's Bay Company according to whatever Charter the British government gave it is embarrassingly simplistic even for a lead section. The tag line that some Aboriginal groups disputed this (notice the lack of any real Nation names, a cliche rhetorical device used by the Whigs to remove complex reality) stands more as a cheap bone then any sophisticated understanding. This article needs to be written in the neutral perspective if it is going to stand up to modern historical standards.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baumgaertner (talk • contribs) 19:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias and Simplicity Underlying the Entire Article
Template talk:PD-USGov-Military-Award

message: Per discussion with User:Mikegodwin, the wording has been changed slightly. -- Avi (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Quoting Bridgeman

message: The ribbon displayed is a bit... um... well, I couldn't recognize it as an award at first, and I don't think the average reader would either. Maybe the Silver Star ribbon or a small Medal of Honor would be better. bahamut0013♠♣ 12:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the image to match Wikimedia Commons' :Commons:Template:PD-USGov-Military award. bahamut0013♠♣ 20:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: change the image?
Talk:Colonial Tramcar Restaurant

message: Hello, I see a link to this has been added to Spårakoff, which I wrote. I'm just curious: Is the Colonial Tramcar Restaurant tram still in service along the city's tram rails, or is it nowadays stationary?  — JIP | Talk 17:29, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It runs through the city centre and a number of inner Melbourne suburbs--Melburnian 09:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:PD-USGov-Military-Navy

message: 
Could an admin please add Navy to this template? Thanks. bahamut0013♠♣ 12:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 15:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: add category

message: Could an admin that sees this change it from image to file, since audio files from the Navy are also used eg. National Anthems: :File:United States Navy Band - O Canada is an example of such an audio file. —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 6:02pm • 07:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The template adds pages to :Category:United States military images, so it's not intended for sound files. We could make a new template for them though. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 07:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be easier just to rename it to :Category:United States military files and use the same template as User:Ancapp suggests. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Can the image 'NavySeal.png' be updated to 'United States Department of the Navy Seal.svg'? Just looking to help with the implementation of svg images.
Nyarkni (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: VernoWhitney (talk) 18:53, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Nyarkni, 16 April 2011 

message: Please update with this sandbox version. Changes: The file was a redirect on comomns, i.e. same image but without redirect. If you are an admin, please consider removing the protection. Only 1839 transclusions. Christian75 (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, for un/semiprotection I'd as on WP:RFPP. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 18 March 2018
Talk:List of current National Football League players

message: I just wanted to point out that after the Z football players and goes back to C players and then all the way back to Z. Maybe someone could do something about that. --Numberonedad 17:38, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Z jumps to C 

message: The merger of this article into List of current NFL team rosters is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League#List of current National Football League players. Please participate. ×Meegs 21:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merger
Talk:Visuddhimagga

message: Dear All,
Isn't it a good idea to change the sanskrit words to pali words, as used in the Visuddhimagga?
I think it would be more correct.
Grtz,
Tjeerd
Just adding two thoughts.  The link to the on line text isn't working for me.  
Also, it might be helpful to identify the time frame of the first translations from Pali to Sanskrit.
--InnocentsAbroad2 (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which link is broken?  Both the Access to Insight and the abhidhamma.org link work for me right now.  What Sanskrit translation are you talking about?  There isn't one listed in the translation/publication list, and I can't find any mention of a Sanskrit translation in von Hinuber (who doesn't mention the Sinhala version either).  --Clay Collier (talk) 05:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanskrit or pali 

message: Hi, I have changed this page by mistake translating into Italian wikipedia and then saving, and Then i restored the previous version of april 2, 2009. --Gattobucky (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No changes 
Talk:Alpha Kimori

message: I've done some general cleaning up (mostly to remove NPOV and duplicate links on the same page). Please discuss here before attempting to revert any changes. Thank you!
Overmage (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Some of the citations to distributor pages no longer work. I assume the game is no longer being distributed by those companies. SharkD  Talk  19:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distributors 
Talk:2004 Afghan presidential election

message: per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 27#Afghan people--Cruizi (talk) 07:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Michelle Hunziker

message: Why is the main photo mirrored? The tattoo is on the wrong arm, the whole image is a flipped version of the one shown at de:Michelle Hunziker.--77.181.113.74 (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main photo 

message: If she couldn't speak German anymore, how did she get a show on Swiss German TV? I don't think it's possible to ever forget your native language, so my real question is why she made that claim in the first place? That should be in the article. Bostoner (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can't speak German anymore?