Talk:Xenotransplantation

message: >patients have received pig heart valves
so what....? i dont care.
This is religiously discriminating (jews muslims excluded). Considering that the majority of medical doctors are of jewish and palestinian origin, one must wonder who developed this method?
:patients who are against this practice can decline it's use on themselves. But saying that nobody should do it because jews and muslims are against it is trampling on every belief system that isn't jewish and islam. Pig transplants are used because these have the greatest success rates for compatibility in the human body. My daughter has a bovine xenograft on her pulmonary artery, she would likely not be alive today without it. I would say it is most certainly not crude, and not something to be regarded as distasteful. Who could be expected to control which types of tissue will and won't be compatible with human tissue? Using pig tissue is not discrimination, it is coincidence. bcatt 12:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is covered under Ethicality. Human life preservation is considered by both faiths to override dietary prohibitions. A common case of such a concern is heart valve replacements, where the choice is mechanical (and lifelong clot reducing medications, with their own complications), porcine heart valve or bovine heart valve. The preferred being the animal based valve, which is treated to remove proteins that could trigger the immune system. At the end of the day, it's the individual who needs to decide if they wish to live or not, as such current xenotransplants are life saving procedures.Wzrd1 (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pig xenotransplant tramples upon Abrahamic religions 

message: I've broken the article into sections. I've left the  there since I feel that the first part should be broken up a little(I was unable to figure out a good way to break it up). A picture would be nice as well. BioTube 04:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification 

message: I am primarily interested in human to animal xenografts.  In cancer research, for example, it is common to grow human tumour cells in rodents.  There is nothing on this on the article, and I would be willing to bet that this type of xenograft is far more common by any measure (numbers, volume of transplanted tissue) than animal to human xenografts.
64.42.209.81 17:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human to animal xenografts 

message: - Religious issues must be solved before xenotransplantation can become a regular operation. -
Who saids that? 
For example, contraceptives are recommended and contraceptives policies are enforced, yet the religious issues are definitively not resolved.
 
I would sign but i can't find the weird symbol
Hey, i found it. BorisDelMas 22:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Xenotransplantation IS a regular procedure in limited scopes. An example would be cardiac valves of bovine or porcine origin. Rejection is avoided by treating the tissue to remove proteins that are immune triggers.Wzrd1 (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement 

message: A lot of money has been made by quacks performing xenotransplants which supposedly could restore physical stamina and intellectual vigour. Several well documented cases are already documented in wikipedia. John R. Brinkley is one of the most notorious.
GregInCanada 23:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These earlier "pre-scientific" procedures should be added to the history section with the customary caveats. Kortoso  (talk) 19:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and Quackery 

message: Should this article mention a sci-fi horror book called "Ancestor," or is it not worth the effort? I only bring this up because the process of xenotransplantation is heavily featured in the plot. --64.131.47.218 18:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: In its present form this article makes a very bad usage of the term genetic code. The genetic codes of humans, monkeys, rats and many other very distantly related living organisms are all absolutely identical. What the well intentioned editors wanted to mean instead of genetic code was probably genome. Please correct if I am right, and please explain if I am wrong. -- Sophos II (talk) 23:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate usage of ''[[genetic code]]'' 

message: I found this article very enriching, but I wish there were more examples in it. 192.114.175.2 (talk) 13:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  examples 

message: As discussed in Talk:Organ xenotransplantation, that article doesn't contain enough information specifically to organ xenotransplantation to justify more than being a subsection of this article. Rather, almost everything there is rather about xenotransplantation generally, and would thus be of more use in this article. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Organ xenotransplantation]] 

message: I've made the merge now, but I'm not sure all the references came through, since I had to convert them from (name, year)-format to wiki style. The complete reference list is found below. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference list

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Xenotransplantation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100626072643/http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=82 to http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=82
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110712221956/http://hotelstgeorgepress.com/2010/05/a-more-modest-proposal/ to http://hotelstgeorgepress.com/2010/05/a-more-modest-proposal/
*Added  tag to http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0908-665X
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080722120810/http://nhmrc.gov.au/about/committees/expert/gtrap/_files/xenotrans.pdf to http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about/committees/expert/gtrap/_files/xenotrans.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080229101256/http://science.education.nih.gov/newsnapshots/TOC_Xeno/Xenotransplants_Print_This_Iss/XenoPrintThis.pdf to http://science.education.nih.gov/newsnapshots/TOC_Xeno/Xenotransplants_Print_This_Iss/XenoPrintThis.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The story of Dr. Serge Voronoff (circa 1910-1930) for instance. Kortoso  (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much earlier xenotransplants 

message: In the early 1960s, Keith Reemtsma kind of had some success transplanting chimp kidneys into end-stage kidney failure humans.  For example, one person lived nine months(!).  Now, this was before long-term dialysis.  So, in a sense, offering someone a long shot was better than nothing at all. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite sure why short-term dialysis was available, but longer-term was not.  But I guess that's the way it was back in 1963.  FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to History Section (Jan. 2017) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Xenotransplantation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923070026/http://www.uncaged.co.uk/xeno.htm to http://www.uncaged.co.uk/xeno.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.crt-online.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've removed what I think is a farfetched assertion that "The prohibition of the consumption of pig does pose problems in Jewish and Islamic communities." I don't think the transplantation of living cells, tissues or organs would be viewed as "consumption" by "Jewish and Islamic communities". Exceptions may exist but if so an appropriate source should make clear what is covered and what is not, because obviously all "Jewish and Islamic communities" would not equate such transplantation with "consumption", as in the "ingestion of food for nutritional purposes". A more nuanced assertion is called for in accordance with the findings of a reliable source, or we should just leave what I think is a marginally absurd comment out of our article. Bus stop (talk) 15:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove unsourced assertion pertaining to "Jewish and Islamic communities" 

message: I'm adding some thoughts from Catherine Remy's journal article "The Animal Issue in Xenotransplantation: Controversies in France and the United States" which discusses some of the history of how the science has developed in perception and practice. I hope to add more in the coming weeks about the history of ethical concerns in this issue leading up to present-day issues. Palpatitus (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethics Add-ons 

message: A step closer to pig organs for humans, in Nature. - 112.119.11.22 (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart of pig .. 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607052/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed