lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Tutorial sandbox heading

message: The purpose of this template is to not include the interwiki links.  It is a copy of Template:Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading) but without the interwiki links.  The reason for this template is that interwiki links do not work on Talk pages. -- AllyUnion (talk) 01:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

message: 
Please add to the bottom of the page,  Suntag (talk) 19:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ffm 23:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentation

message: Please change the line "For uses of sandboxes, see the article sandbox." to "For uses of sandboxes, see the article sandbox (software development)."  Sandbox is a disambiguation page, and the link is not helpful to inexperienced users.  --Russ (talk) 22:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason to change the text. The disambig page will get readers to whereever they need to go. . — Huntster (t • @ • c) 10:54, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: The links to the project pgs are out of date. Please add the updated code from the sandbox: . Thanks, --Funandtrvl (talk) 05:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Talk:Edward de Bono

message: The article suggests that de Bono's writing is simple and clear. Well, no. de Bono's prose takes simple concepts perfectly well explained by his predeccessors and then spends whole books reiterating quite simple points - at book length rather than the paragraph or two they require.
Ok thats one opinion,very complex-there is never any justification for things being complex when they could be simple.
It has been suggested;the easiest way to be 'superior' is to protend to understand what others cannot understand.For that you need complexity.The reason i think some people find de bonos writing un-clear is because its unique.People who want to use language to destroy de bonos work are dangers to civilisation unless they take the time out to aquire some real education which can be found on de bonos website.
It seems that 'jealeouse' criticts are good at complaining but incapable of creating a body of work with more value,de bonos not on an 'ego trip' his sole perpose,his aim is to creat the neccasary tools for people to cope with and improve an increasingly complex society.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.132.148 (talk) 09:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  de Bono's writing is clear? 

message: Beware of lateral thinking --Error (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: I propose merging Parallel thinking into Edward de Bono. The content in the former article can easily be covered in the latter article. De Bono came up with the concept of "Parallel thinking", and the concept is borderline notable. It makes no sense having a standalone article on the concept. A merge of any of the salvagable content from the former article would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in the latter.Thenightaway (talk) 19:07, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think merging would be a good idea. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

text: Support merge, this term seems to be primarily associated with De Bono and there's not enough content on either page to justify a standalone article. Psychastes (talk) 20:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Xiantiandao

message: Tendo is a Japanese take on the same thing, brought over from Taiwan in 1963.  They do have a web site, mostly in Japanese, but with some content in English http://tendo.net/english/  Their web site does explain some of their mythology.
One of the most telling things about Tendo, is the fact that their name for the savior goddess is Raum (pronounced Laum) and L is not a sound normally found in Japanese language, clearly showing it's Chinese origins.
Tendo does practice spirit-writing, and does follow the rest of the key tenets - assuring salvation by converting people to their religion, saving believers during the end of the world events, etc.
198.84.233.162 (talk) 19:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tendo 

message: I have removed this article from membership of WikiProject Organized Crime because the article has no content that indicates any involvement in organized crime. Although the article is included the :Category:Triad (organized crime) there is no content I can identify that warrants this categorization. If someone can explain the connection and include sourced content in the article then also feel free to reinstate the banner. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from WikiProject Organized Crime
Talk:Klingon starships

message: For users wishing to add technical data to this article, for example size, crew compliment etc which sources are considered canon?
*I'd check at Star Trek canon, but to be brief about it, strict canon is what you see on screen in the TV shows and movies. There isn't an awful lot there, you won't often see them put a line in dialog talking about how big the crew of a ship is or how long it is.  Officially licensed technical manuals have a lot of information in this regard that while not strictly canonical, is the most official word on the subject, written by people who have been integral to the production of Star Trek like Rick Sternbach and Mike Okuda and often called "semi-canon" and is the best information on the subject in a lot of regards.  --Wingsandsword 14:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canon Data

message: For maximum geek points, one of my first contributions to Wikipedia will be here, in the Klingon ship discussion...
The Vor'cha is credited as first appearing in "Sins of the Father".  I just saw the episode again yesterday (which prompted me to come here), and I didn't see a Vor'cha there.  There was a Bird of Prey, however.  I'll have to see if I can come across the actual first appearance of a Vor'cha.
JBHemlock 18:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vor'cha first appearance wrong?

message: before the invention of the internet, before Star Trek TNG, when it was all fandom and fanzines and Starlog, Matt Jefferies explained how the D-7 began as the Enterprise/ Yorktown, but the design was rejected. The next design (for the Enterprise) was what became the Horizon with the big ball primary hull, which was again rejected. later, after the Enterprise design was finalized, and the Klingons needed a ship, Matt remembered his earlier design, updated it, and submitted it. TOS purists will know that there was no Klingon ship in the Klingon episodes of the first season. Only the Romulan ship had been built.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.18.19 (talk) 02:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Art of Star Trek, Matt Jefferies, and the D-7 

message: Was the Klingon's spaceship original design inspired in Luigi Colani's aircraft designs? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_JwVHNJgOQ#t=28s 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPGL73H81cU#t=102s  Eyesighter (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. The article says the orginal series Klingon ships were designed to invoke a manta ray - frankly don't see that at all. They've always reminded me of Canadian geest - the bulbous head, slender neck, and then the main body with outstreched wings. Yep, Klingons are tooling around the galaxy in ships shaped like some of the most annoying birds around...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:4280:A710:84A7:6C99:B492:CD70 (talk) 17:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luigi Colani's Aircraft Designs
Talk:Homotopy groups of spheres

message: The color scheme might be improved for easier accessibility compliance for the section 508 requirements and doesn't seem to account for the color blind type tests typical in an United States primary education test 184.185.78.118 (talk) 03:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the rainbow theme of the sphere images necessary 

message: The head section of the article mentions that the stable homotopy groups of the sphere \pi_{n+k}(S^n) have been computed for values of k up to 64, while the §History section gives the figure 90, citing a freely-available research paper as a source. Although I have nowhere near the required expertise to examine this source myself, I don't know where the first number of 64 came from, and since there is no accompanying citation I am questioning its credibilty. I choose to put a 'citation needed' tag, and write this topic in case someone knows of a credible source for this figure. If no one manifests any knowledge after some time I will probably replace this 64 with the 90 and add a citation to the aforementioned paper, and update this topic. Tommpouce (talk) 22:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , it looks like the paper calculating out to 90 was published just a year ago.  I think it would be ok to update the earlier part.  Do you want to go ahead and do so? Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I thought so as well. I'll update the article right away! Tommpouce (talk) 12:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent figure for number of known stable homotopy groups of the sphere
Talk:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

message: The references listed beside the "F-16V Block 70/72" didn't even use that term. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency also didn't even use "F-16V Block 70/72", and instead used "F-16V", "F-16 Block 70/72", or "F-16C/D Block 70/72". See the reference below.https://www.dsca.mil/search/node?keys=F-16V If you have reliable sources yourself that it's stated as "F-16V Block 70/72", please reply. RPC7778 (talk) 06:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  F-16V 

message: Several editors have added a "Future operators" section for Ukraine.  Bulgaria and Slovakia were also added in the most recent case.  The addition of the section has repeatedly been reverted as there is no consensus to include such sections in military aircraft articles apart from the occasional "Potential operators" section.  Since the number of attempts to add the section have risen over the last few days, it's probably worth having a formal discussion. - ZLEA T\C 05:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Operators with aircraft on firm order do not have to be separated as Future operators. A future user with a firm order is effectively an operator.  WP:Air does not do this in any other aircraft article that I am aware of. Regards -Fnlayson (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

text: I concur with . The Legacy (talk) 03:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future operators 

message: If all chinese sources and taiwanese media are excluded, are there any official sources (or other sources) that prove taiwan "invested" in the development of the F-16V? 14.199.160.12 (talk) 03:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would Chinese and Taiwanese sources be excluded?  Taiwan News is not listed in WP:RSP as either reliable or unreliable, so there are currently no grounds to exclude it.  If you believe that Taiwan News or any other source used in this article is unreliable, feel free to bring it up at WP:RSN. - ZLEA T\C 04:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About taiwan "invested" in the development of the F-16V
Talk:(Not Just) Knee Deep

message: Did the scat solo solo guy Philippe Wynne say the recurring phrase "Ants in my pants and I need to dance" in that song? --SuperDude 02:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he provides the vocals for the outro; such as "Make no mistake, that funky music got what it takes. To groove you sometimes and knock you down, make you want to turn around and do it one more time yeah." "Oh, it must be me, must be funksety (or some variation of that word)." K.H (talk) 00:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it's Wynne, but the lyrics are "Can this be me, immersed in funk so deep?" — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 01:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Why was this song put on VfD and RfD in the past?  I turned it into a redirect since the past article was deleted. --SuperDude 21:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD and RfD 

message: The song's in 4/4. Either there's a bad source, George Clinton didn't actually understand time signatures, or there's a missing step like "the song was rewritten in 4/4". Can't determine which of these is the case 175.38.211.148 (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Or more likely, some Wikipedia editor didn't know what he was writing about. It's gone now. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...he thought that the 3/4 time wouldn't make the song good for dancing."
Talk:Gilbert Gottfried

message: :In late 1997, [Gottfried] met Dara Kravitz at a Grammy Awards party. They were married in 2007 and had a daughter, Lily (born June 12, 2007) and a son, Max (born May 18, 2009), named after Gottfried's parents. He was a longtime resident of the Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan.
"He" who? Gilbert? His father? His son? (I know it's not Salvador Dali, because he's not mentioned in the article.) – AndyFielding (talk) 12:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity
Talk:Andrea Echeverri

message: Why does a search of Echeverri redirect to this page? Echeverri is a surname mostly found in the city of Medellin, Colombia....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.75.209 (talk) 14:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Echeverri 

message: Her age? --Camilo Sánchez Talk to me 21:47, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Patrick Stewart

message: May I respectfully request a brief paragraph added about Stewart's dog advocacy to the personal life section? He's been known for this for some years. There are several articles but this provides perhaps the best overview: https://www.aspca.org/news/legendary-actor-patrick-stewart-honored-aspca-pit-bull-advocate-protector-award
It is my understanding that Stewart requested that a pit bull be Picard's dog in the new TV show because of his advocacy. https://www.thewildest.com/dog-lifestyle/patrick-stewart-dog#:~:text=Appearing%20in%20two%20episodes%20of,his%20advocacy%20against%20breed%20stereotypes.
Even a sentence as simple as "Stewart is an advocate for pit bulls" with a source/link is sufficient.
Thanks for your consideration. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:109E:FB89:C445:C647 (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request March 24, 2023 

message: In the article it mentions that he voiced the story plaques for the game LEGO Universe. He did indeed do voice lines for these story plaques, but they were never used in-game. His presence in-game is limited to narrating part of the game tutorial, providing audio for on-screen prompts telling the player how to move, jump and rotate the camera.
I suggest either replacing the story plaque part with tutorial, or removing it. Wincent01 (talk) 14:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit request to his contributions to LEGO Universe 

message: Add "Making it So" to audiobooks list Chrisduncansb (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Already in the "Books" section. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2024 

message: Remove the red links of Connected Universe and My Memory of US! 2804:7F2:6A9:3A1A:38DC:2631:FFFD:3E30 (talk) 07:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charliehdb (talk) 09:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024 

message: Patrick Stewart did NOT portray the "eponymous character in the Marvel Cinematic Universe film Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022)." The eponymous character in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness would be Doctor Strange himself, and Steward portrayed Xavier in that film, not Strange. Reword this statement as "alternative version of Xavier" or something similar. Woozybydefault (talk) 17:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misname in lead
Talk:Laserdisc video game

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus.--Jorfer 20:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

message: From the article: "Although laserdiscs have become an obsolete technology, the term "laserdisc game" is still used to refer to games that feature pre-recorded video as a gameplay element, even if laserdiscs themselves are in no way involved."
Nobody uses this term to describe games with pre-recorded video.  Those types of games are commonly referred to as "Full Motion Video" or FMV games.  This line should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.234.11 (talk) 16:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Term "laserdisc game"
Talk:Travail (band)

message: See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Travail for a record of this article's listing for deletion; the result was to keep.  Postdlf 03:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mad Professor

message: The edit from (15:54, 2005 May 12) seems to be: removing section headers, and adding back the wikify tag.  Isn't the point of wikifying to section up a writeup to make it more readable and create a better flow?  Why would edits be made which are opposite in purpose? - Mark McCartney (talk) 04:00, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
:No, "wikify" means ading Wikipedia style, in  line with the document to which the template links.  Breaking it up into small sections isn't Wikipedia style (in fact it is warned against, as making an article jerky and bitty). Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 09:31, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikifying 

message: Wouldn't it be better to move this page to "Neil Fraser."  There is already an article there, so it would require disambiguation, but wouldn't that be more in line with Wikipedia's nomenclature?  --Gandalf 03:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Neil Fraser]]? 

message: I'm sorry but I can't see the value of the photograph Image:madpo.jpg It is blurry and whoever has added seems unbothered about things like formatting and the appropriate size of images on wikipedia pages. I am going to revert it. John Eden 09:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hope folks like the image I just added. My wife and I met him during a soundcheck for his show at Reggie's in Chicago, IL on September 18, 2011. Very nice guy. K8 fan (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos and reversions 

message: Due to a backlog it is no longer possible to give comment on ratings. Please put any comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 20:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Biography Rating

message: why is there no discography section to this article? - Adolphus79 22:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography?
Talk:Radio Song

message: See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Radio Song for a record of this article's unsuccessful deletion listing.  Postdlf 04:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Region of Southern Denmark

message: 2009 October 9*
2009 October 9*
Suggestion: change "Danish structure-reform of 2004" to "Danish Municipal Reform of 2004" (apparently a more common translation of Kommunalreformen in Wikipedia and elsewhere), and maybe link to "Municipalities of Denmark" (there's at least a brief mention of the municipal reform at the bottom of that page).  --Skoosh 04:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Flammagenitus cloud

message: Forest fire smoke can strongly resemble a cloud as it rises, probably on account of the water content from combustion.  Would it be helpful to clarify the distinguishing features?  69.145.82.2 04:06, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears those edits have been made in the wake of the Station Fire in Los Angeles.  The presence of that pyrocumulus cloud hovering over Hollywood and Beverly Hills nearly shut down the 911 system as concerned citizens frantically dialed 911 to warn of the end of the world as we know it! LiPollis (talk) 03:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: can be caused by forest fires

message: The latter is the only usage I've seen, but I'm not a meteorologist. However, there is no entry for "Flammagenitus " at the AMS glossary, so I don't think this is a non-controversial rename. Hence I'm opening the discussion: should we retain the common name, or use this uncommon and awkward (to my eye) neologism of the WMS? --Pete Tillman (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the WMO has introduced this term recently. http://www.popsci.com/theres-new-species-cloud-celebrate-with-some-pretty-pictures --Jonathan Williams (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: App the actual full WMO name is Cumulus congestus flammagenitus : , xref at pyrocumulous. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The terminology is complex. Here are more names that I have seen:
* cumulonimbus flammagenitus
* pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb)
These clouds sometimes have features of lightning, visible precipitation, and/or anvil heads. Sometimes (maybe always) they collapse, creating sudden, dramatic bursts of wind at ground level. In the context of wildfires in the United States, "pyrocumulus" is used by the website Wildfire Today, as in this example, which includes time-lapse video. Those bursts of wind at ground level would be extremely dangerous in such contexts. I suppose there is a good source somewhere to support my interpretations.  Oaklandguy (talk) 23:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flammagenitus vs. Pyrocumulous 

message: Hello, I am a student at the University of Oregon in a Natural Disturbances and fire class. I was researching the topic as I love weather and the Flammagenitus fits in with the class. Based on a few articles found, researchers have found that these clouds can carry pollutants into the stratosphere which would suspend the particles for a much longer time. Since this is a newer finding, it is hard to say what kind of impact it'll have on climate change. I would like to add a section about the possibility of a link between the two as more information comes out. 
Baseballkid10 (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition for climate change potential 

message: There is no need to disambiguate whether or not flammagenitus is a cloud, since that is the only meaning. With that being given, the title should be changed to either "Flammagenitus cloud" or just "Flammagenitus." Master of Time (talk) 01:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title should either be "Flammagenitus cloud" or just "Flammagenitus"
Talk:Petpet

message: This article was listed for deletion; no consensus was reached.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Petpet.  Postdlf 04:08, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Why does this article even exisit? I think it should be merged with the Neopets Article. And soon! 59.101.72.224 (talk) 01:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with neopets article