lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arnulf (archbishop of Reims)

message: Arnulf, Archbishop of Rheims → Arnulf, Archbishop of Reims – Seems fairly clear cut - all other articles spell the place Reims, including the main article (Reims) plus Archbishop of Reims · Adalberon, Archbishop of Reims · Notre-Dame de Reims etc. — SteveRwanda 08:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support - As above. — SteveRwanda 08:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. The page has two or three entries in its history so I can't move it. Always an annoying thing when its an uncontested move. I asked User:Makemi to do so a while back but he hasn't, so I decided to go through this channel. SteveRwanda 06:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support - As above. — SteveRwanda 08:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. The page has two or three entries in its history so I can't move it. Always an annoying thing when its an uncontested move. I asked User:Makemi to do so a while back but he hasn't, so I decided to go through this channel. SteveRwanda 06:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The article claims the reason for Charles' and Arnulf's imprisonment as refusing to attend a synod, though in Hugh Capet there is a section devoted to how Arnulf felt his blood tie to Charles was more important than his oath to Capet, and opened the gates to Charles and pretended to act terrified, and surrendered Reims, though he was later betrayed by Adalberon, bishop of Laon and handed over to Capet along with Charles, at which point they were imprisoned. This seems to me like a fairly important event in Arnulf's life which is completely skipped over in this article. Anyone against me adding this? PutinOnTheRitz (talk) 21:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible elaboration on surrender of Reims
Talk:Merzbox

message: I have removed the text which was lifted from the Extreme Records website . Cnwb 10:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: can someone add a list of content on the cd-rom as well as format specification and length?
 
Its hard to tell because of the random interface on it. Its more you click on something and something happens rather than any sort of linear content. Run Dna 14:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cdrom 

message: The review which was described as "comprehensive" was not comprehensive in any way.  The music was hardly mentioned; instead we were treated descriptions of the author's insecurities and part time jobs.  Also, it is obvious he has no theoretical grounding in noise music, nor an ability to appreciate it.  I wouldn't have wasted my time with the article if it was described properly in Wikipedia and I believe it now is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.burl (talk • contribs) 09:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed "Comprehsive Review" to "attempt by college student to listen to all 50 discs" 
Talk:Sam Yorty

message: Third worst? Other than Coleman Young of Detroit, I can't think of any US big city mayors of the last 50 years worse than Yorty. I'm guessing that the other mayor considered worse than Yorty would have been a New Orleans mayor or perhaps Frank Rizzo of Philadelphia.
:Here's an extract from a review of the book, The American Mayor: The Best and the Worst Big-City Leaders, by Melvin G. Holli:
:*Taking the first-worst prize among scoundrel mayors is Chicago's William H. "Big Bill" Thompson (1915-1923, 1927-1931), one of the most colorful mayors in the city's history, if not the most corrupt. Big Bill, also known as "Kaiser Bill" for his pro-German stand during World War I, accepted campaign funds from gangsters including Al Capone. Also among the "worst" is another Chicago mayor, Jane Byrne (1979-1983), the only woman on the list. Jersey City's Frank Hague (1917-1947) and Philadelphia's Frank Rizzo (1972-1980) are among the other notable rascals who have sat in city halls.
:I assume Mayor Shaw is somewhere on the list of the worst mayors in the last 100 years.  -Will Beback 18:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe that the subject is rarely referred to as "Samuel William Yorty". All three obits we use as sources refer to him as "Sam Yorty". Any objection to moving the page?  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 00:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sam" vs "Samuel William"

message: This article needs to cite some sources, currently there are none afaict.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.75.126 (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: In Malcolm X's May 5, 1962 speech he specifically points out Sam Yorty.  This can be found at about 15 minute and 19 second mark of the video of Malcolm's famous speech.  I would love to see this quoted or mentioned in the wiki somewhere.  --172.251.204.186 (talk) 07:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malcolm X speech 1962 

message: Why is the legacy section about Frank Rizzo? 2601:42:801:A410:3D8C:1B0A:2746:8D39 (talk) 04:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy Section 

message: The final paragraph under Mayoralty contains the following "Yorty's previous race-baiting demagoguery came back to haunt him in 1973..." This seems excessive in tone and indicates a lack of neutrality. I propose it should be reworded to better fit the Wikipedia standards for not expressing personal opinions on the part of contributors. Rtucci (talk) 02:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for asking. Done, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 04:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessively negative tone
Talk:GarageBand.com

message: WTF? In response the all the freakin flags saying it needs to be cleaned up and Wikified... Sorry I'm new and not catching on to quickly. 
Wiki had ZERO info on THE biggest thing for unsigned artists and garage bands the internet offeres... ZERO INFO until I added this 411, so when you admin's fix the probs include an explanation so I don't repeat and flag every damn thing I try to contribute --ChemSet 08:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't something be mentioned regarding Trusonic?  If it weren't for Trusonic, there would be no GarageBand.com! --Compdude512 14:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trusonic 
Talk:Naval warfare in the Mediterranean during World War I

message: The second sinking occurred on October 30, 1918, then Horthy was ordered to surrender the entire Austrian fleet to the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (Yugoslavia). SMS Viribus Unitis was renamed Jugoslavija 
This is doubtful since name Jugoslavia was used much latter, at the and of WWI there was no Yugoslavia --Tmilovan 09:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

message: If the allies won the war and the Central Powers surrendered, why is the Mediterranean Campaign considered inconclusive? It says at the very beginning of the Austro-Hungarian Navy article that as result of the war the Austrians surrendered their fleet and the empire had no coast or ports left and therefore had no need for a navy. If I understood that, I'd say the Austro-Hungarians were completely defeated in the Mediterranean Campaign. I will change the outcome to Allied victory, if anyone has a problem, change the result back but first leave an explanation here. Thank you.--$1LENCE D00600D (talk) 10:06, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome

message: This article is very badly written, very inaccurate, and not at all academic. 81.131.212.88 (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies
Talk:Sidearm (baseball)

message: As to these two statements:
The sidearm motion is a more natural motion of the arm and leads to a reduced risk of elbow and shoulder injuries that are common in pitchers.[citation needed] 
Sidearm pitching is becoming more popular in baseball, especially for relief pitchers.[citation needed] 
I have always heard the opposite, and that sidearm pitching leads to injuries. Also, sidearm pitching is not "becoming more popular in baseball," as there are still only a handful of pros who pitch sidearm. Who said this stuff?
By the way, here is a college coach who agrees with me:
http://www.stevenellis.com/steven_ellis_the_complete/pitching_mechanics_sidearm/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.7.33 (talk) 02:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote this stuff? 

message: I have corrected, or at least improved, the discussion about sidearm, including the discussion about injuries. It is not possible just to say that sidearm is healthful or injurious to the arm. So much depends on where the arm is when the stride foot lands, not to mention the individuals' physiology. Truthfully, I think that it must be said that pitching itself predisposes pitchers to shoulder and elbow problems! But that said, proper technique, not matter the arm slot, is the pitcher's best hope for a healthy career. Joelthesecond (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now I've written this stuff! 

message: This article needs a segment on crossfire pitching technique or crossfire delivery which is unique to sidearm delivery. http://sabr.org/bioproj/person/47baa7b1http://www.letstalkpitching.com/t/crossfire/9754/6  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.253.138.227 (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossfire 

message: Any info on the highest recorded speed of a sidearm pitch in MLB and Japan? Setenzatsu (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed
Talk:Hesh Rabkin

message: Could someone please upload the picture of Hesh from his HBO profile? (see external links)--Opark 77 08:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Back when the Family Tree was on HBO's Sopranos web site, it said that Hesh was Jackie's Consigliere. Anyone know anything about this?
Ant1238 19:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consigliere
Talk:Sigma Omicron Pi

message: Readers would be interested to learn why, at re-establishment of the first two chapters after WWII, the two chapters switched names.  I know I'd like to know more. Jax MN (talk) 02:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was doing well to even figure this had happened and to find dates. It was missed by Baird's. From what I can deduce, the sorority went defunct during WWII. Their history says "forced" to close which would be weird for teaching sorority, so I am guessing something ugly to do with Asians and the U.S. government (wish I knew that story) Only one of the two chapters (Beta) reestablished after the war in the 1940s, so it apparently took the Alpha name. No idea why the Beta name was held in reserve, but it was used when a chapter was reformed at the original campus more than 35 years later. So they reversed names, but not at the same time. If you think I can say more without it being guessing and/or original research, let me know. Rublamb (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical inquiry
Talk:The Bolshoi

message: I thought The Bolshoi formed in Trowbridge then moved to London. I've seen no reference to Leeds in their press releases. Wswaine 08:48, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Paul Clark the keyboard player was from Leeds, moved to London and joined the band. I've seen reference to the band being from Leeds but this is not accurate. Thebolshoibrothers (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gilbert Foliot

message: I can't find a source for this one, which is why I felt the verification tag was called for. --Agamemnon2 08:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Starting my much delayed work on him. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting work

message: I haven't felt competent to undertake a peer review, as on both first and second reading I found nothing of any substance to suggest. I look forward to meeting the Rt Rev on the front page. I have made three tiny corrections of what I think are typos, which please check. Good luck! Tim riley (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: Authority Control is a new topic to me.  I have had a quick look-up of what it means and half understand it.  I note, however, that two or three of the initial references to authority control here are failed links.  I have absolutely no idea how to correct this.  Will watch closely to see how they are resolved by someone who does understand the topic. Quartic (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authority Control
Talk:1 Corinthians 13

message: I've added the "needs expert" tag because this article isn't very strong on theology or biblical scholarship. Mattmm 07:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep - still not enough scholarship! I've put the expert tag back. I'm not sure why it was removed... Mattmm 12:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert tag 

message: At the risk of OR this article appears to ignore the obvious.
Chapter 13 was never intended as an essay on love, as the article implies and as many wedding ceremonies assume. Rather it is an essay on the particular sort of love that Paul sees as the gift of the spirit, and part of a larger essay 1 Cor 12-14 on the gifts of the spirit.
I'll look for sources to back this up as I find time. Or, any help doing this appreciated. Andrewa (talk) 19:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: In context

message: I augmented quite a bit of this.  All religious texts are subject to controversy.  As this passage is a cornerstone of Christian theology, this is even more true.  I expact that people will take issue with it.  
Being an expert or authority in one context or according to one standard (academic for instance) does not immediately give one credibility elsewhere.  Furthermore, matters of interpretation are inherently subjective.  Thus, an expert tag is seeking something probably unattainable: a definitive interpretation.  The closest thing to an authoratative interpreation would come from reading the numerous translations themselves, and then, secondarily, reading the vast assemblage of online commentaries.  I used multiple translations in my modifications today.87.175.202.187 (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Minimalist 

message: I find this to be a pointless addition that does not fit with the rest of the article. If you were to list every significant person who ever quoted the Bible, Wikipedia would be in need of a few new servers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.253.115.92 (talk) 01:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved it to popular culture (where it probably belongs) and also trimmed it to avoid phrases like "to the nation". Still, I wouldn't mind removing it alltogether. Str1977 (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do frequent references not qualify the phrase as important? Certainly, the bit about being a child is used at some point in Ghost in the Shell. Though you could debate it's cultural significance... 188.222.179.211 (talk) 21:36, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't the fact that Blair and Obama quoted this be moved into a new sub-heading called something like 'In Popular Culture'.  The Ghost in the Shell ref could be added then. Jonpatterns (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  President Obama / In Popular Culture

message: Currently it states that there are two other notable passages, yet currently, only verse 11 is listed. Clarification? Eug.galeotti (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Other notable passages"
Talk:Non-executive director

message: UCLlukechapman (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

message: is a non-exec director the same thing? i don't know... i would create a redirect and put the alternative name "independent director" if it was for sure. Knowsitallnot 08:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  independent director  

message: The "Role" section includes the statement Together with the five important the achievement of balance of the board of directors as a whole as well as commitment, perception and a broad perspective of the area or industry.. This is incomprehensible to the extent that it's impossible to re-cast it into English. Can someone who understands corporate governance take a look, please? 86.172.152.99 (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 
Talk:United States hand grenades

message: As according to Wikipedia guidelines WP:NAME and my own personal opinion, the use of "Survey" in the article title is redundant and excessively complicates it. Furthermore, it misleads the reader, as naming this article "Survey of ..." gives the impression that this article is about an official survey carried out by the US Armed Forces or something like that. Hence, I advocate a move to Modern United States hand grenades. Ariedartin JECJY Talk 06:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's still the issue brought up about the use of the word "modern" as well, which I agree with needing to be modified (either in name or in content of this page).  I am still not entirely sure how its redundant and complicated either.  The idea behind using the word "survey" when I created this article (and the one on 40mm grenades and aircraft gun pods), was that this page would not necessarily provide a definitive amount of information on any one of the systems mentioned.  That being said, I am largely indifferent to a name change, though I feel it should incorporate to other issues raised. -- Thatguy96 10:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing is, most articles start off as stubs anyway, so there shouldn't be the intention of keeping the information brief. Just the subject of the article is enough - unless its a list, there is no need to create an excessively long title. I'm just doing my rounds standardizing the articles according to the WP:MoS. Granted, since "modern" might be a wee bit subjective, I suggest something else. How about Hand grenades used by the United States? =)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariedartin (talk • contribs) 15:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Hand Grenades of the United States or United States hand grenades (Which allows for the inclusion of a section dealing with pre-WWI hand grenades) is probably the best.  That way all concerned parties are happy.  I think taking out "survey of modern" from the title, leaving "United States hand grenades," presents the shortest and most accurate title.  Feel free to make a similar change to Survey of modern US 40 mm grenades and Survey of U.S. Aircraft Gun Pods.  -- Thatguy96 15:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate title? 

message: How about some idea of when these entered service? The introduction gives no context for period covered.GraemeLeggett (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Any data on that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.10.95.11 (talk) 09:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many joules does a grenade release?
Talk:China Motor Bus

message: I just went through this article briefly and I must say I feel there are some things that could be done before this article is promoted to Good Article:
1. The prose is quite choppy and does not read too well, especially in the history section (individual sentences).
2. For somebody not acquianted with the HK mass transit system, some issues are unclear and there are no Wikilinks that would help here.
3. The Internet Archive link does not work, plus there are two links to image search on yahoo rather than to the images or webpages containing them directly.
I do not have a clear vision of what an ideal public transport operator article should look like, nor am I knwoledgeable on the topic, so please forgive me for not helping out with improving it. I also don't feel experienced enough to fail this nomination, but please note hat from the point of view of a common Wikipedia user, this is not a good article yet.  Bravada  Talk to me! 16:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA
Talk:Del Taco

message: The "Del Taco Holdings, Inc." box at the top right shows "founded 1957 in Yermo, California."  The article text under "History" (plus Del Taco's website) shows "founded in 1964 in Yermo, California." astorino (talk) 08:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding Date Contradiction? 

message: the 'history - 1970s' section mentions that "casa" was dropped from te brand name, but nowhere the original brand name (inluding te word "casa") is mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.118.139.125 (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclarity about name change 

message: 192.189.187.108 (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about the Detroit Michigan stores????---- 

message: The phrase, "He was the mastermind..."  <<  Is this OK?  It seems like unsubstantiated opinion to me, and self-promotional.  If others agree, I would suggest removing that phrase, or re-wording it to something more encyclopedic and neutral.  Cheers. 73.6.96.168 (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the 1980's section... 

message: So, the founders of Del Taco were most definitely Ed Hackbarth and David Jameson. Who's the jokester who put "Watson Ferreri"? The only person by that name I can locate via Google is a 14-year-old from Okemos, Michigan. This.is.mattness (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Bahooka (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Founders" named in the sidebar
Talk:The KLF/Archive 1

message: : 3Am Eternal is (probably) a reference to the times they got into trouble for sampling ABBA, travelled to Sweden & ended up burning the masters for their track in the middle of the night. At least that's what I remember from an interview with them. -anon
----
I reverted to this version as it is far cleaner and contains most of the same information (as far as can be determined) as the latter versions.  --Robert Merkel 09:56, 17 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Some very old chat from [[KLF]]

message: I want to take issue with a couple of statements.
* 'Drummond would later lament about the decision not to release the single under the JAMs moniker.'
: I don't think this is true, I have never heard of this and I would like to see proof. I think this is a Michael-ism.
* 'Some people believe that the seriousness of the whole enterprise may be best indicated by Cauty and Drummond's appearance in one videoclip as leather-jacketed, sunglass-wearing rockers playing sitar.'
: this is PoV and it doesn't even make sense - why would 'leather-jacketed, sunglass-wearing sitar players' indicate that the band members were not serious?
cheers -Drstuey 03:55, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Can anyone shed light on whether the atrocious girl-band "Vanilla" and their single "No Way No Way (Mna mna)" was a hoax perpetrated on the UK music industry by Bill Drummond?
: I doubt it. Drummond has left the music industry. He's now an author and artist. He did launch the career of girl band Strawberry Switchblade on the world though but that was in 1985 - Drstuey 04:00, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: While it is a natural human trait to attempt to find a reasonable explanation for strange phenomena, I'm afraid you'll just have to accept that the existence of "No Way No Way" simply defies all reason. Bonalaw 10:07, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanilla 

message: Um, i read somewhere that those were not blanks...
I also read that some of the audience pissed on themselves...
does it all matter? Believe what you read. Elvis is in the north pole.
Project2501a 11:35, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brtis awards performance 

message: For some reason, I just have to believe some of this was tongue in cheek and probably drug fueled.  I mean the point of the exercize was to mock convention as controlled by the 'illuminati' and cause chaos. You can't take yourself too serious and bring proper mayhem and chaos.
--24.44.218.50 04:18, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  my shiny nickel.