Talk:Batu Khan

message: The Mongols' horses were of the Tatar breed, a breed of horse that is able to find food by brushing the snow aside with its nose.   The horses used by the Europeans would starve.  WheahYooAt, June 18, 2005, 04:05 UTC  
<Blockquote>    The Tatar cavalry was superbly disciplined and their weapons were superior to any in Europe.  Their arrows were longer and heavier.  The Mongol horde entered Russia in 1237.  
"The villages disappeared, and the heads of the Russians fell like grass before the sickle."  
The majority of Europeans were either monks, hired servants, or slaves.  Only the nobility and the free men were armed.  Feudalism prevailed in Europe.  
Alexander Nevski dismissed all thoughts of battling the Mongol tornado of war.  
</Blockquote>
WheahYooAt 16:16, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)  
Breakneck speed was a quality that was manifested by the Golden Horde.  The main unit of the army was preceded by thousands of Mongols who constructed roadways.  
Breakneck speed was a quality that was manifested by the Germans at the onset of World War II, also.  The Nazi troops rode motorized vehicles as they performed their Blitzkrieg ("Lightning War").  
WheahYooAt 12:29, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
:Idiotic comparison. The Mongol tactics have no similarity whatsoever with a modern mechanized army.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.46.18 (talk) 12:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I can't say that Russia was ruled 'directly'. Had it been the case, there would have been no local princes. Wydraf 10:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath

message: :Unable to find leader Sartak.  WheahYooAt, June 18, 2005,13:42 UTC  
:Sartak may have been a Christian son of Batu.  68.162.175.51 18:33, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sartak

message: :1.  Genghis Khan (1162-1227)  (Named Temu-jin, originally).  He united all of the nomadic Mongol tribes in 1206.   
:2.  Ögedei Khan (also called Ogotai)  Sent out three armies in 1235.  
:3. Güyük Khan   WheahYooAt 17:43, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
:4.  Mangu Khan  ( -1259)  Succeeded by his brother, Kublai Khan.  
:5.  Kublai Khan ( -1294)  (Also called Khubilai Khan)  The son of Tuli Khan.  He declared himself Emperor of China in 1280.  
<Blockquote>Kublai Khan was the last of the Great Khans.  A new title of Emperor began.  His successor, Timur, his grandson, the second Emperor, ruled from 1294-1306.  Kublai Khan had established the Yuen (which meant "a Mongol," and hence an alien) dynasty.  He had fought and defeated the Tatars in 1260 and founded the city of Khan Balig (Kambalu) which was the nucleus of Peking.  His defeat of the Tatars and the establishment of a capital city effectively shattered the Mongols sphere of influence into four great divisions.   </Blockquote>
<Blockquote>The third Emperor, Kaisun, accomplished little during his short reign (1307-10).  
Ayuli Palpata, the fourth Emperor, a dedicated Buddhist, spent vast sums on priests and ceremonies, and grinding taxation resulted during his reign (1311-20).  </Blockquote>
<Blockquote>In 1367, during the reign of the ninth Emperor, a temple servant named Chu Yuan-chang, at the head of a large army overthrew the Yuen.  The Ming or Illustrious dynasty (1368-1643) replaced The Yuen.  </Blockquote>
151.201.131.24 14:20, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The term KHANATE is of European origin.  21:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: Sartaq Khan contains the facts. 71.253.56.204 18:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Khans list

message: Although Kublai Khan declared himself Emperor in 1280, the first Emperor of China had appeared in the third century B.C. at the Ts'in dynasty from which China is named.  WheahYooAt 00:56, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be the Qin Dynasty, led by Qin Shi Huang.  In the MoS, you may note that pinyin (Qin instead of Ts'in, Yuan instead of Yuen) is preferred unless the name is very popularly known through W-S or some other notation (e.g. Confucius instead of Kong Fuzi.) siafu 15:50, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: An Early Emperor

message: Please note that the correct English spelling of the city name is Chernihiv. The city has been never renamed. The name Chernihiv is applied by respectable English sources to the whole history of the city. Please note that Britannica reffer to the spelling Chernigov as to Russian. Let's use British/American English. Please do not invent "Russian English". Thanks.--AndriyK 09:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: replied at talk:Chernihiv. --Irpen 17:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The correct spelling of Cherni''hi''v 

message: I commented out the following section from the article:It is very clear militarily that had the Kipchak Khanate attacked the remainder of Europe in 1241, after their destruction of the Hungarian and Polish forces, they would have easily crushed Austria, Germany, Italy, France and Spain.  Only the death of the great Khan, and the subsequent enmity between cousins saved Europe.  Each year the Poles celebrate the Battle of Leignitz as a great victory that saved Europe from the Mongols.  The truth is, it was a terrible defeat for the Poles, showed the utter uselessness of the European Knights and their "Battles" as a basis for armies against the Mongol grinder.   While European rulers lead their armies and considered honor as a prime consideration for any battle, the Mongols were interested solely in winning.  While the Europeans were loosely organized, to put it mildly, in their "battles," (Knights and their yeomen), Mongols fought in a modern army formation based on units of 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000.  Mongols had mastered the use of flags during a battle to dictate troop movement, and other innovations that Europeans would not use for another 200 years.  Luckily for Europe, Batu Khan died in 1255, just as he was preparing to finally invade Europe using Subutai's plans.  His son might have carried out his father's plan, but he also died shortly thereafter, and by the time Hulagu Khan sacked Bagdad, Batu's brother Berke had become Kipchak Khan.This is not, by and large, factual information and can't be presented as such.  I'm not suggesting, of course, that's it's a ridiculous supposition, but it presents a particular POV as fact.  In order for this paragraph to be acceptable for an encyclopedia it needs to be referenced and attributed, so that it's not original research, and rewritten to reflect its origins, so that's it's NPOV. siafu 01:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They most certainly could have reduced fortresses - but when the Mongols invaded Hungary they were moving fast, and had left their siege engines and Chinese specialists to operate them in Russia/Ukraine. They were trying to catch the remainder of the Cumans and while in Hungary had no time for long sieges.  Ogedei's death did indeed save central Europe from a nasty route, had Subotai continued his campaign. Holding on to the area with garrisons would have been another matter, as the Mongols were over-extended. HammerFilmFan (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Speculation

message: IMO this article is totally off topic. It reads more like a general "invasion of europe" article than the one about Batu Khan that it is suppose to be. We should take away most of the stuff here. At least site the sources.
ParallelPain 09:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not on topic

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Hungary 1241.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Batu Han.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Batu Han.JPG)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Batu Han.JPG Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Batu Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101113102742/http://www.ucalgary.ca:80/applied_history/tutor/islam/mongols/goldenHorde.html to http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/islam/mongols/goldenHorde.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Not much in the way of inline cites in this article, are there? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a very, very badly written article that meanders all over the place and has many factual errors.  I've re-written many of the Mongol articles, but just don't have the energy anymore. Wiki is so full of crap it's astouding.50.111.46.18 (talk) 12:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline cites 

message: We seem to be over-doing the alternative languages for Batu Khan's name. I couldn't immediately find the WP:MOS page that addresses the issue (I assume one exists), but MOS:NICKCRUFT gives Batu's grandfather Genghis Khan as an explicit example and says to not use any foreign languages, not even Mongolian. I'll follow that example and remove the clutter. Huon (talk) 22:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's OK to remove them. However we can add common alternative names/languages used in academic sources to the article. --Wario-Man (talk) 04:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages for the name 

message: There are some internet jokes being made about batu khan so i say a temporary lockdown is necessary to prevent vandalism Greatfloorpads (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should have been extended confirmed months ago. I raised concerns but sadly they fell on deaf ears. - Hunan201p (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

text: im guessing this is about ambatukam? TheEpicChickenYT (talk) 23:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary lockdown