lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gorkamorka

message: What is required to remove the notability warning?87.194.152.184 (talk) 05:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...Apparently Games Workshop doesn't even publish this game on its website anymore.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.9.240.76 (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On page 32 of the first Necron codex (2002, ) there is a report about Necrons on Angelis. This is frequently cited as a source for Gorkamorka lore. It is in that it's a useful document, it's not in that Codex Necrons contains a reprint. In the actual Da Uvver Book from Gorkamorka (so 1997) it can be found with some other reports at the back, page 104. Games Workshop's PDF of the book is actually missing pages. There's a scan of the book floating around that contains them all as well as a Frankensteined amalgamation of the two if you want to take a look. In those PDFs the document in question is on page 106.
On a similar note there is a scenario in Gubbinz Issue 1 entitled "Da Necron Rayd". It too is often cited but is in fact a fan submission like most of the other articles in the magazine (and the Citadel Journal from which it was an offshoot). As such it isn't strictly canon even though it does tie into the narrative Games Workshop later created. See the following sources for details:
* 'Something Stars in the Dark of Space' White Dwarf 216 (January 1998), back cover 
* Battlefleet Gothic: Armada, pg.78 (2004, ) 
* Warhammer 40,000 4th Edition Rulebook (2004, ), pg.183 
* Codex: Space Marines (4th Edition)(2005, ), pg.74 
* Warhammer 40,000 5th Edition Rulebook (2008, ), pg.181 
* The Fall of Damnos (2011, ), pg.63 
Compiled from here: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?271266-A-Short-History-of-Angelis
82.17.38.138 (talk) 16:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codex Necrons and Gubbinz as sources
Talk:Inquisitor (game)

message: I added the Game box as per the Warhammer 40,000 page and added some other things to expand the article out of a stub. If there is any suggestion for what is needed to be added, I would appreciate it. SanchiTachi 06:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This Place Sure is Empty
Talk:Boot camp

message: Please see discussion here. --Henry W. Schmitt 18:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move. 

message: Needs references and removed work indoctrination - has negative impressions - biased Kernel geek (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: disambiguation pages rarely have references, and should reflect what is said in the articles they link to. Graham87 11:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: These programs are also called "boot camps".  Includes A+ and Cisco and others.  What distinguishes "boot camps" from other technology training programs?  Does this justify an article? 74.190.95.2 (talk) 00:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology Certification
Template talk:User Norden

message: Why are we in black all the sudden? Kind of a depressing color, not? --Anjoe 14:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe so, but black is also good for visual perception when contrasted with lighter colours, especially since the square is sooo tiinyyyyy.;J BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 14:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I rv'd to previous version and suggest dark green rather than black or fix the whole fragging colour scheme for everything ... The old one was really nice, perhaps even "just perfect?" MX44 11:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add dark green if able and willing, MX44. I might give it a try too or else I might simply restore the "black" map as I see fit. In any event, you may eventually have to create a personal userbox yourself or perhaps make an alternative template that you may edit at your own leisure. If you wish to copy the current version of this userbox to your user page, you are free to add  to it. The bottom line is that you get to decide what's in your own name space, not others'. (York and Tallin are about as Scandinavian as Cape Town is Dutch.) BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 14:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Easy there BigAdamsky. You don't get property-rights on Wikipedia. I am also a user of the template, and I think the current version is far superior to the black one. On top of that I don't think a dark green would make it any nicer, allthough maybe the map itself (not the color scheme) could be bettered. --Anjoe 18:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Color choice

message: BTW: the template wrongly categorizes users in :Category:Scandinavian Wikipedians when it on the other hand has the text and the name "Norden". Instead it should go to :Category:Nordic Wikipedians. --Anjoe 18:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right; I will (suggest we) establish the Nordic Wikipedians cat you mention above. Also, in a strict sense, Scandinavia ≠ the Nordic region. I'm not sure how restrictive the inclusion criteria for the Nordic cat should be, however. --Wernher 22:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category tree

message: Why rule out that places like York and Tallinn, which in a certain light, sometimes can be seen as part of Scandinavia? --DS
:Well, Tallinn unquestionably belongs to the Hansa region, and the Baltic, but to say it's part of Scandinavia, and/or the Nordic, is to stretch those regions a little far, IMO. York is of course part of the former Viking/Dane area of influence, but, like the Shetlands and the Orkneys, or the Isle of Man, or Dublin, for that matter (the latter was, as you know, founded by the Vikings), York isn't any longer part of Sc. or the Nc. as such (as BigAdamsky says, "York and Tallin are about as Scandinavian as Cape Town is Dutch"). 
:I, for one, however, dreamingly wish for your suggestion to be reality; a Great Nordic Empire! *evil laughter* >:-))) Too bad the Vikings didn't rule their domain as efficiently and dominatingly, and forward-looking, as I'd wish they had... --Wernher 22:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: York, Tallin, ...
Talk:Psyker

message: I believe that the Astropath section should specifically reference Soul Binding with the Emperor, along with some other minor verbage revision (Black Ships capitalized, etc.) Schoon 19:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Soul Binding

message: The term Primaris Psyker should be in the Imperial Guard section Schoon 19:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Primaris Psykers

message: I think, due to the size of the article and the content, that Astropaths should be merged into this article. -Localzuk (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to me. --Pak21 13:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed³. Merge it! --The Enslaver 20:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -Localzuk (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Astropaths

message: In line with WP:FICTION, I'm thinking of renaming some sections of the article to approach the topic from an out-of-universe POV. For example, instead of "Psykers in the Imperial Guard", we'd have specific sections for "Sanctioned Psykers" (and maybe their past incarnations such as the Primaris Psykers, etc. Shrumster 06:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming? 

message: Added qualifier to the Necron entry touching on Commissar Cain's experiences; it had not been made clear (mainly to people who arent familiar with the works) that the books are written with a tightly characterised, idiosyncratic narrative style deliberately meant to convey the very limited point of view of the titular character. Any statements made in it pertaining to the 'truth' of something in the 40k universe are not to be taken as literal; more than once Cain has talked about a feature of his adventures that we as the omniscient reader know to be incorrect. WarpGhost 19:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necrons 

message: Are you sure that they're considered a part of the Space Marines? I thought that they were from the Ordo Maleus 
(I may have spelled it wrong) of the Inquisition. I heard that people frequently associate them with the Space Marines because they very frequently fight alongside them, but they are not actually a part of the Space Marines. Wakata
They are a Space Marine chapter in their own right, but have very close ties to the Ordo Malleus. They are considered the Chamber Militant of the Malleus but the Malleus can only request their aid, not command it. ABurness (talk) 13:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grey Knights
Talk:Irish prose fiction

message: I've added a stub marker to this section as it seems very threadbare indeed. It needs a much more comprehensive account of contemporary Irish fiction writing. --Wastekiller 10:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Fiction Now - Stub 

message: Why no mention of Oscar Wilde? Colin4C 17:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscar 

message: Isn't there a need for an explanation for J. G. Farrell's inclusion here, given that he wasn't born in Ireland, and appears to have only lived there intermittently? Isn't he a Liverpool-Irish writer like James Hanley and Gerald Hanley, rather than Irish?Rwood128 (talk) 10:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  J. G. Farrell: is he an Irish writer? 

message: Wouldn't a better title be Irish prose fiction, given the ambiguity of the term fiction: "Fiction can be expressed in a variety of formats, including writings, live performances, films, television programs, video games, and role-playing games"? Rwood128 (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: On further thought it appears that this article takes "fiction" to mean novel, and an articles does exists on the Irish short story. All the same I don't think that there is a need for a further change (Irish novel), and there is the possibility of merging these two articles.  Rwood128 (talk) 13:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prose fiction? 
Talk:Kow Otani

message: * IMDB knows him as 'Kô Ôtani', which I assume is ASCII for 'Kō Ōtani'.  According to their database, he's been credited as 'Kow Otani' only twice and 'Kou Otani' only once out of 30 different credits.
* Google ranks them 'kou otani' (3150), 'ko otani' (1420), 'kow otani' (832), 'kou ootani' (539), 'kow ootani' (233), and 'ko ootani' (32).
* According to my system's KANJIDIC file, the only two readings of '幸' starting with 'ko' are plain 'ko' (in names only) and 'kou' (hence 'kō').
It seems to me the use of 'kow' is really just a cheap (7-bit) transliteration to make casual non-Japanese pronounce it vaguely correctly.
If there are no objections, I'll see if I can get around to renaming the page to 'Kō Ōtani' and editing the intro paragraph (to include all of 'kow', 'kou', and 'ootani' as A.K.A.s) later on. – Wisq 14:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Two months passed with no objections, so I've done the move.  I'll need to figure out exactly what A.K.A.s to put in later. — Wisq 19:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Is there any proof that what the guy above says is true? Someone could have easily made that up for their own personal spelling preference. Besides, "Kow" is a weird transliteration; his name is pronounced "Koh", not "Cow". 'Koh' is also much more widely used in official publications, whereas I've never seen anyone spell it "Kow". It sounds weird to English speakers, and if the guy above can't confirm his affiliation then we should just go by group consensus and what's on record. 'Koh' or even just 'Ko' I'm fine with, but "Kow" is really pushing it. --Don't mess with the ROBOT (talk) 09:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:The Redeemer

message: Theirs alot of key information missing.  Reedemer was originally started as a one off comic strip, whereby they were on a giant redemption wagon, attacking a tonne of mutant bikers, who had been spawned by some gigantic mutant beast.  Many issues of warhammer monthly later, and they started 
the story currently described in the article.  After that story much later on they did another one of story where the reedemer had been captured along with many other notorious dezines of the underhive for a gladiator style fight.  Also Malakev, is not a servitor as the person who wrte the article has said.  He still has the same mind and personality that he is shown to have throughout the story.
all of the comics were originally black and white as was typical of all early comics of warhammer monthly.  The main series, and the second stand alone comic were compiled together in one graphic novel and coloured in.
Thescumfiend 17:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information missing
Talk:Pokémon Stadium

message: *https://web.archive.org/web/20000312150420/http://headline.gamespot.com/news/98_04/17_long/index.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/20001024120338/http://www.videostoremag.com/content/news.cfm?ID=268.00000
— Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyBlackwing (talk • contribs) 19:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Pokemon Stadium 3. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 21#Pokemon Stadium 3 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TheAwesomeHwyh 15:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pokemon Stadium 3" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Power Stone 2

message: IS going to be for the psp  http://dreamcast.ign.com/articles/731/731883p1.html  MetalBladeX4 22:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PSP release

message: Is the title Power Stone 2, or Powerstone 2?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.182.210 (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  One or Two Words
Talk:Rayman 2

message: The Rayman 2: Revolution article is mostly a duplicate of this one and it doesn't assert that's the ggame is changed a great deal.  Shouldn't these be a single article? Ace of Sevens 02:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How?  The Revolution page describes a few minor enhanhancements and level revisions and doesn't mention anything except the sprites objects now being 3D.  These merit mention in this article, but ports typically aren't given separate pages unless they are more or less a whole new game.  The changes to somethign like Return to Castle Wolfenstein are much bigger, but the Xbox and PS2 verssions still share a page with the PC version. Ace of Sevens 04:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, note that Rayman 2 is technically an enhanced remake, and not just a direct port. Also, there are a lot of articles on enhanced remakes that currently exist, even if the changes to the new game may be considered somewhat minor (such as added features or updated graphics). For example: Donkey Kong Classics, Duke Nukem Advance, Kaettekita Mario Bros., Super Mario All-Stars, Super Mario Bros. Deluxe, Conker: Live & Reloaded, Lode Runner: The Legend Returns, Kirby: Nightmare in Dream Land, Mother 1 + 2, Final Fantasy I & II: Dawn of Souls, Final Fantasy Origins, Super Mario Advance, Diddy Kong Racing DS, Super Mario Advance 2, Super Mario Advance 3, BS Zelda, Metroid: Zero Mission, Sword of Mana, Pokemon FireRed and LeafGreen, Sonic the Hedgehog Genesis, BS The Legend of Zelda: Kodai no Sekiban, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past/Four Swords, BS F-Zero, Frogger 3D, Earthworm Jim PSP, The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time Master Quest, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney, Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Justice for All, The Legend of Zelda: Collector's Edition, Super Mario Advance 4, and Super Mario 64 DS all have been given their own articles. --TBCTaLk?!? 18:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of those only have their own articles because they were part of a collection.  Some, such as Duke Nukem Advance are not remakes at all, but brand new games.  Master Quest was an expansion, not a remake.  That doesn't really address the question, though.  What makes it an enhanced remake as opposed to a spiffed-up port? Ace of Sevens 00:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Merge' The article does not add much to what is already in the Rayman 2 article. --Zooba 11:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: I just need to know where the mines are, the mountain or the island? I'm just trying to add to the stage description, and I hope you don't mind that thing with the squirrel SPA...Killbrain1 21:11, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  how far goes the mountain
Talk:Resident Evil: Survivor 2 Code: Veronica

message: Around 2002, I saw and played this arcade machine on the east coast of the United States. Maybe the article should mention that it appears the arcade machine made it's way to North America? AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Availability In US

message: In the PlayStation version,there are files you can pick up,there's a file that reveal that the game is just a dream.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.207.115 (talk) 12:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dream
Talk:Rhapsody: A Musical Adventure

message: Was this game released in Europe? --Mika1h 11:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gamefaqs is your friend, and I don't believe that it was. Cabij 02:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  European release 

message: If anyone has played Little Princess: Maru Oukoku no Ningyou Hime 2 or Tenshi no Present - Marl Oukoku Monogatari, Id appreciate if they started pages on said games. Thanks! Evaunit666 02:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, that editor went on to be blocked for a number of issues, including linkspamming. See Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#TomitakePrincess.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_-_again - Alison ☺ 01:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Games

message: I was reading that forum from that link I found in the article's history about the extra content. I havent heard anything else about this, but it's starting to sound like it might develop into a small controversy. I'll keep an eye out for third party sources. Evaunit♥666♥ 20:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: rpg land Evaunit♥666♥ 20:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why isnt what the glitches are specified? Arent they described in any of the sources?Evaunit♥666♥ 13:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, it's more a matter of whether the exact details of the glitches are "notable" or not. And considering we're talking about an issue with the US version of a DS port that only has a tiiiiny blurb there, compared to the rest of the article, I'd say they're not. Heck, even the original title of that DS version (Marl Ōkoku no Ningyō Hime  Tenshi ga Kanaderu Ai no Uta, for what it's worth) isn't mentioned there. Anyway, mention the details of the glitches, and I think you might end up doubling the size of that section just for that, on top of sounding like a FAQ from a gaming site... ^^; Erigu (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy?

message: What's with all the ill-fitting categories at the bottom? This game was developed for the original Playstation and Nintendo DS only; there were never any plans for it to appear on the N64, Dreamcast, Gameboy Color, Xbox 360, or Wii title lineups.
68.12.107.6 (talk) 03:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories
Category talk:Rivers of Russia

message: This category holds rivers from all parts of Russia, being at the same time a subcategory of both European and Asian rivers. As result rivers like Amur and Yenisei are under :Category:Rivers of Europe, which is confusing. I propose to split it in two categories - something like "Rivers in European part of Russia" and "Rivers in Asian part of Russia". They can either become subcategories here, or go directly as subcategories under :Category:Geography of Russia and :Category:Rivers by country. I am aware it would be a laborious task. -- Goldie (tell me) 14:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a bad idea. Don't divide it. - Darwinek 10:58, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for split 

message: Is there any good reason why these river articles should be directly in this category when they are already in subcategories of this category? Hmains (talk) 17:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why in this cat?
Talk:Rune (video game)

message: Could someone who knows something about the game fix the last sentence for the Dwarven Battle Hammer? I can't figure out what "In multiplayer, the Battle Hammer is functional and works fine in pretty much every situation in comparison to Work sword, it's more secure." is trying to say. Thanks. -Nesoo (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Readability

message: One of the external links ("Rune Clan listings and information" - http://www.runehordes.info) is now "dead". Runehordes.info shut down a couple of months ago, so any information found on that site is old and outdated. Should the link remain or be taken away? Or should there be a note made somewhere saying it's no longer reliable in terms of up-to-date information? The site still contains a gigantic list of clan history in Rune, although it can't be updated anymore. And the creator said he'd keep the website itself up for the overseeable future. I don't usually involve myself in the editing of wikipedia articles, so I don't know what standard procedure in cases like this is. So I'll leave it to someone else to make the decision, just thought I'd inform you about it. 85.229.50.111 (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: why do they own the IP?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.150.42 (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Nine Realms
Talk:Seaman (video game)

message: Should there be a separate article about Seaman 2, made for the PS2?  There's no mention of it here.99.228.17.253 01:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel Confirmed

message: Any word of the game getting ported for PC Play?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.236.142 (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PC Port? 

message: I'd love to see a citation on the "Seaman/Semen" comment about Nimoy. Added tag Gpia7r (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nimoy

message: Hola feo pan 73.166.146.217 (talk) 19:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi ugly creature
Talk:Lattice model (physics)

message: I'm not sure what this page is. Is it a disambig page? Or just a stub article. Also, lattice is a disambig page, what lattice is meant here? Or is it the one that is defined here? Ewlyahoocom 14:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, cleaned it up. linas 15:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:William King (author)

message: This article is written as if we already know some of the info. Back to Scotland, when was he in Scotland before, you don't mention, you mention he moved to the Czech Rep as if its already been said without any further info on it. Where, Prague? When?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 19:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graham McNeill

message: The plural of "codex" is "codices." I have corrected this. No, no, put your money away; this one's on me. 80.47.131.161 17:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe GW uses the plural Codexes when referring to their products... I have to look into it. --Falcorian (talk) 21:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here for example. http://us.games-workshop.com/Community/Moderators/grahamm.htm I'm going to change it back to fit with GW. --Falcorian (talk) 21:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Codexes Vs. Codices

message: Much of this article has its information doubled: things from the bibliography find themselves written out, at length, in the prose sections of the article. I'm going to edit it down, and then mark it as a stub. Much of the information is unsourced, and feels self-authored. McNeill does fit WP:N, but W:NPOV is more dicey. As the subject is still alive and working, more thorough editing to conform to W:BLP is needed. Imaginestigers (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up required