lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2005 Men's Ice Hockey World Championships

message: I believe the recent addition of the following paragraph
:Canada had won the previous two World Championships. The outcome of the gold medal game pleased many Europeans who were upset that the Canadians had done so well with only 9 players who had played during the lockout and were still in game shape. Also, the recent dominance of Canada, not only at this event, but at the 2004 World Cup of Hockey, and 2002 Olympics by Wayne Gretzky's hand-picked teams concerned other nations that Canada had returned to being hockey's international powerhouse.
has not been a good idea. It does not offer any context, seems POV (and unencyclopedic) to me, and even strange/wrong -- "concerned other nations that Canada had returned to being hockey's international powerhouse" -- what does that mean? Of course Canada is a hockey's international powerhouse, the defeat does not make them hockey amateurs any more than recent wins has made them hockey pros. There are no other commentaries and opinions in the article and I don't think this should be an exception. --Mormegil 09:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinions
Talk:Veterans Memorial Stadium (Troy University)

message: Is there a reason why this is "Movie Gallery Stadium, Troy" and not just "Movie Gallery Stadium"?  Is there another one somewhere else?   Rlquall 00:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It appears that some folks are attempting to remove any reference to the stadium previously being named for Richard Scrushy. I understand that this may be somewhat embarrassing for the school, but it nevertheless is a significant part of the facility's history. Realkyhick 01:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrushy 

message: The name of the stadium is Movie Gallery Veteran's Stadium, not "Movie Gallery Stadium, Troy."  No one mentions his name in relation to the stadium because a) the stadium wasn't named after him, the field was, and b) Since Scrushy's convictions no one really considers it 'Scrushy Field' anymmore.  Troy has played football for around 100 years, the field was named after him for just a few.  That does not make it a significant part of Troy's history.
Trojan101 08:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Hafada piercing

message: I'm going to merge this article into transscrotal piercing since it's related and the body piercing page doesn't actually go into details on various kinds of piercing so much as it lists links to more dedicated articles on those topics. 
00:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merg

message: Image is actually a Lorum piercing (at the base of the shaft) and should be replaced with a scrotal skin piercing image such as 'Scrotum_piercing.jpg' Tetsuo (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Image for article
Talk:Megadeath

message: On 24 May 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The decision was "keep" but without a clear recommendation of the form of "keep".  Options discussed included "keep as is", "keep as redirect to Megadeth" (a plausible spelling error), and "keep as disambiguation page".  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Megadeath for a record of the debate.  Further discussion should 
occur on this page.  Rossami (talk) 22:14, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from VfD

message: I've read Herman Kahn's books On Thermonuclear War, On Escalation, and Thinking About the Unthinkable, and his testimony to the June 1959 Congressional Hearings on the "Biological and Environmental Effects of Nuclear War", and nowhere does he use the term "megadeath", which as far as I'm aware was invented by Stanley Kubrick in his 1964 film "Dr Strangelove". I've also read arm-waving apocryphal allegations made by recent "biographers" of Herman Kahn, which claim he used "megadeath" in the 1959 hearings (where they also misrepresent his excellent testimony entirely), which he clearly did not from the published testimony.  Can anyone cite any examples of Kahn's writings (including page numbers, or quotations of sentences) containing "megadeath"? 82.21.58.162 (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Megadeath was not a word used by Herman Kahn in "On Thermonuclear War" or other books and talks

message: This article falsely asserts that "megadeath" was popularized in "On Thermonuclear War".  It is not used once in "On Thermonuclear War" or any other book, article or statement by Kahn. 86.174.217.252 (talk) 08:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Megadeath is not used by Herman Kahn in any book, article, congressional testimony, or interview
Talk:Australian Government/Archive 3

message: I find it absurd that, after what I said here, Skyring persists in his accusation that Adam is committed to explain himself for reverting User:144.138.159.214. As I said (and clearly this has not registred, and so there is the need for a pointless reiteration), it is User:144.138.159.214 who should provide an explanation for having changed large portion of consensus text, not those who revert him/her back into the version overwhelmingly supported by all editors here, save Skyring (and the elusive User:144.138.159.214). As for the  minor error that was retained in the process, it is of little consequence. El_C 23:40, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Enough textual redundancy already

message: I recommend commenting out the parts of the article you dont like rather than reverting. Yust put it in . Anythng in this will not be avalible in the article but will be avalible in source. I also recomend you explain eaxh other what you not like and what you suggest. Use the folowing as you see it. 
Example: 
Page originaly has "Green is good."

----
Hope this helps! --Cool Cat My Talk 01:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure I'm following you. Are you familliar with this content dispute? El_C 05:51, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: His comments on my talk page just now, regarding a complete unrelated matter were... how shall I put this ... unresearched. Hmm. And note that I have never met him/her until today. Does not inspire confidence at this point. El_C 07:15, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A suggestion
Talk:Warrendale, Detroit

message: The article about this page was very nice, but personal experiences probably aren't appropriate for Wikipedia - it's usually best just to stick to the facts.  I know this because I've done the same thing and this is the response I got!  The article has been trimmed down a bit. Rmisiak 01:12, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Before the merger:
* Henderson, Erma Lower School - http://web.archive.org/web/20051212041239/http://schools.detroit.k12.mi.us/jsp/index.jsp?Henderson - 9600 Mettetal, Detroit, MI. 48227 - Outside of Warrendale
* MAE C. JEMISON ACADEMY - http://web.archive.org/web/20030504121053/http://schools.detroit.k12.mi.us/jsp/index.jsp?Jemison - 6230 PLAINVIEW, Detroit, MI. 48228 - Barely outside of Warrendale (on the other side of Evergreen) - But if RSes say it is "in Warrendale" I could still put a photo req for it. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Henderson and Jemison
Talk:Roy Campbell (Metal Gear)

message: Where did this piece of information come from? I was under the impression Gray Fox was the only FOXHOUND Member to ever recieve the Fox Designation! --The Pain 12:47, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: His previous Chicken Fox codename was mentioned in the manual for Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake (the original MSX2 version), the game which first introduced Campbell. Jagged 20:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicken Fox Designation 

message: I changed the way the Campbell pictures from 1999 were, the old way looked sloppy and crap the long explanation wasn't needed either for each picture (The Bread 04:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '99 Campbell pic
Talk:Education in India

message: The wiki page for Gurukula https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gurukula&redirect=no provides much more detail on the subject than this page. People looking to learn more about the subject should not be redirected here. 174.27.157.112 (talk) 16:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No redirect on "Gurukula" 

message: — Assignment last updated by Adirrao (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: India in Global Studies

message: The topic menstrual cycle must be in syllabus of class 7, because generally menstrual cycle begins at the age of 10-15. And at this basis so many girls in India don't know about menstrual cycle at that age, around 11-14. So, they can take wrong decision when they see they are bleeding and can attempt for suicide. So they must be know about menstrual cycle at class 6 or 7. Not much more information but at least they might be know about it.
Thank You,
~Krunal 2409:4042:249B:B406:EC68:9A50:FED9:D9B2 (talk) 09:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menstrual cycle must in class 7
Talk:Educational leadership

message: I removed the following addition from the article:
"The current paradigm of thinking stresses the Management as a science. So the application of its empiricism have been initiated in the field of education also. This gave birth to a new field called the Educational Management (EM). The EM is a one emerging area in the pedogical research by which one can estimate the outputs and problems of the system of education. For instance, the position of NIEPA and the SIEMATs in Indian education plays the role of Research Organisations in the field of Management in the broader level and Educational Planning and Administration in the field level."
It seems to be talking about the field of educational leadership in India, but I can't figure out what it's trying to say well enough to incorporate it into the article, and it may be too specific for a general article like this one. --RobthTalk 12:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: 1. Nature and importance of authorities and responsibilities
2. clarrifying responsibility and authority
3. delegating authgority and responsibility  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.76.208.42 (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  delegation in instructional leadership 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: move. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Added some schools that offer the programWarrenpd86 (talk) 15:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Other than a list of universities offering a degree in this subject, essentially the entire article is unsourced.  
The COMMONNAME for educational leadership is educational "administration" or "management".  The article claims, without any sourcing, that the name has changed recently. I don't doubt that the "leadership" version may have become fashionable, and might be used for some of the PR reasons alleged in the article.  Nevertheless it is a new term and a rebranding of a familiar degree mostly known under the old, less sexy, name.  73.89.25.252 (talk) 06:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is completely unsourced, and misnamed  

message: — Assignment last updated by Tc3739 (talk) 18:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP23 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Forward price

message: It has been up for merger for about a year now. The general discussion has leaned towards keeping them seperate, so I am going to just go ahead and remove the tags. -Warhorus 07:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I suspect dividends should be forward valued using e^{(r-q)(T-t_i)} as per a much earlier version.  Consider a stock that pays a dividend tomorrow equal to 100% of the spot price.  The forward should be nearly zero.  The existing formula  F = S_0  e^{(r-q)T} - \sum_{i=1}^N D_i e^{r(T-t_i)} \, will give a value substantially different from zero due to the cost of carry being applied to the spot value but not to the dividend.  The importance of forward valuing the dividend with R-q is that as dividends come out of the stock, cost of carry is applied to a smaller asset, just as the cost of capital R is applied to a smaller asset as dividends get paid out.Jh321 (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula

message: It seems very reasonable to merge these articles.  There are other possible mergees also (e.g. spot price, covered interest arbitrage, some of the "see also's") but there is no reason to get carried away - perhaps a better division and cross references could be devised.  
There does seem to be a division in explanations. In one the convenience yield, dividends, etc. are dealt with as cash flows, and in the other as a rate.  As this article is starting to do, perhaps we could do both completely in one article and then show the correspondence of the two models.
:No, you should not merge these two articles. While this may be confusing, generally a forward price refers to the price of buying a futures contract, although these two prices should be in parody. This comes from the difficulty of obtaining accurate data when it comes to the pricing of forwards, so the futures markets are used as an estimate of sorts.
::I agree. The articles should not be merged. Ulner (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  re:merge with forward contract
Talk:Island platform

message: The inclusion of the "geographically limited" template on this page is, in my view, just plain daft. Island platforms are to be found wherever there are railways. In its examples the article at present mentions six countries by my count. Presumably had it not mentioned any at all it would not have attracted this absurdly misplaced template. By all means let's have more examples, but I propose deleting this silly addition to the page. -- Picapica 09:08, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographically limited?? 

message: Unless the nominator argues that railways are no longer important then this article, which expands a basic dictdef into a competent rationale, is well worthy of its place.  Please remove the tag.  --SockpuppetSamuelson 12:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Clapham Common Tube Station Platforms - Oct 2007.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 17, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-11-17. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Clapham Common Tube Station Platforms - Oct 2007.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: I've removed a couple of completely uncited assertions that island platforms have lower construction costs. Basically this assertion is at best counter-intuitive (and hence needs explanation and citation), at worst it is probably a case of generalising from the specific.
I can see that when constructing a station on a completely new line, the costs of a single island platform may well be cheaper than those of two side platforms. But when talking about constructing a new station on existing track, the cost of slewing the tracks to create the space for the island platform must surely outweigh any duplication in construction costs.
As I said in the edit comment, if you can find a citable source for island platforms being cheaper to construct in the general sense, please feel free to revert my changes and add the cite. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lower construction costs 
Talk:Williamsburg, Brooklyn

message: What means "Population (2010) • Total	32,926 (113,000 with the subsections)"? And if there is a population of 32,926 how can there be "Williamsburg's Satmar population numbers about 73,000"? תנא קמא (talk) 21:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Satmars are included in the 113,000. If you're wondering about 32,926, maybe it's referring to the core neighborhood of Los Sures. If you check the source given, there's a separate count for North Side-South Side and Bedford. StonyBrook (talk) 21:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: So maybe change the lead section so that it should include all Williamsburg? Per this source it is at 150,713. Thank you. תנא קמא (talk) 12:11, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: 202.172.124.165 (talk) 10:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Rents are collected monthly in Brooklyn. I've changed the article to reflect that and will add a citation or two (right now mostly what I find are real estate listings.) Average rates are different from neighborhood to neighborhood depending on local amenities, distance to public transportation, nearness to Manhattan, "desirability" - of which Williamsburg is considered very desireable, etc. Netherzone (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   Is rent per day, week, fortnight, month? it is assumed the reader knows, some don't. 

message: I noticed that the infobox stats were recently changed, but a verifiable, reliable source was not added or noted in an edit summary. The population was changed from 78,700 to 151,101 (almost double) and the income average was changed from $76,608 to $98,284. Pinging the editor  who made the change so they can provide where this data came from, and a link to the source so that can be added to the article. Netherzone (talk) 18:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population and income statistics change in Infobox
Talk:Pope Benedict XVI

message: Requesting partial or full reversion of this edit , per WP:OVERLINK. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:MOS]] request 

message: Benedict had the longest lifespan among popes in nearly 800 years. This needs to be mentioned. --95.24.68.78 (talk) 21:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's assuming we're including time as a former pope. GoodDay (talk) 22:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age record 

message: Namely the critiques in how sexual abuse cases were handled, acknowledged by him or even the alleged accusations. This article is biased. 71.17.81.187 (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you show some sources? Flux55 (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing alternate perspectives including controversies which can be found with most public figures. Interesting that was left out.
Talk:Rose DeWitt Bukater

message: Pah! James Cameron won't say whether Rose has passed away or is dreaming in her sleep is because he doesn't know the bleeding answer! Had he known, he would have let the public know. And in my opinion, Rose is dreaming. If she had entered the afterlife, she would have been an old woman. When Jack and the others died on the ship, they were still young, but by the time Rose passed away, she was 101 or more years old. If she died and entered the afterlife, she would have met young Jack as an old woman. Jienum 20:06, 7 August 2006 
:Also, according to Egyptian culture, someone enters the afterlife as he was when he died. I'm not talking out of my backside. This is what I have studied. That's why it called "a safe passage into the afterlife". Jienum 12:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I was saying the whole time. Rose was dreaming about Jack, because I noticed that everyone waiting for her looked as young as they did when they died on the ship. If Rose had entered the Afterlife, Leonardo DiCaprio would have been kissing Gloria Stuart, because by the time Rose dies, she's over 100 years old. Jienum 15:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death or Dream?
Talk:St. Jude Championship

message: Naming the articles describing PGA tournaments is a problem, since the names are constantly changing due to sponsorship switches.  Existing practice as seen by PGA Tour#Schedule is inconsistent — some tournament articles are named after the original or root name, others are named after the most recent sponsored name.
In this case, I've chosen the root name, "Westchester Classic", since "Barclays Classic" is utterly undescriptive of where the tournament is located for what its heritage is.
:I think we should use the current official name of the event unless there is a geographical designation which has always been part of the title, as for example Canadian Open. The name you have chosen for this article hasn't been official for nearly 20 years, and I should think that most non-Americans (a large and growing portion of people who follow the PGA Tour) have never heard of Westchester anyway. What are the inconsistencies in the PGA Tour article? I can't spot any. Osomec 15:51, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever about using the current name, I think using the future name is premature. Wait until the beginning of the 2017 season before moving from the 2016 name. I clicked through from 2016 FedEx Cup Playoffs and was discombobulated. I have moved it back from The Northern Trust to The Barclays jnestorius(talk) 16:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What to name these articles
Talk:Ron Gardenhire

message: Gardenhire has insisted on regular playing time for Nick Punto since his arrival via the Eric Milton trade in the early 2000's.  Punto, like Gardenhire in his playing days, has the skill set of a light-hitting utility infielder.  Despite his limited offensive skills, Punto received salary in excess of $4 million dollars per year for the 2009 and 2010 seasons.  The Twins did decline the $5 million option on Punto for 2011.  However, Gardenhire may convince Twins management that Punto should be signed to a multi-year deal beginning in 2011.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.76.162 (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick Punto 

message: I remind all users to only add information that is verifiable and that cites reliable sources. Unsourced material may be removed at any time. Repeated additions of unsourced material will be regarded as disruptive. Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP
Talk:Drygalski ice tongue

message: This seems to overlap with Drygalski Glacier. Anyone know how to merge the two?
--jaymin 03:14, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Use the :Template:merge.  I already done it.  --Geopgeop 05:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Err, I meant I brought it up where the merge process can be done. --Geopgeop 05:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Template talk:AMQ

message: Template:AMQ has been listed at Templates for discussion (nomination), but it was protected, so it could not be tagged. Please add:

to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 00:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request to complete TfD nomination