Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks

message: No where in this do I see a final decision to delete the article.  Why has this happened? -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 17:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

message: An recent article, The Myth of Wikipedia Democracy, is refering this case. You can find Wikimachine's comment after the release. --Cheol (talk) 20:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent mention

message: :Original discussion
:
# Remedy 3 of the Liancourt Rocks case is rescinded. 
# In its place, Standard Discretionary sanctions are authorised with immediate effect for all pages relating to the Liancourt Rocks;
# Nothing in this motion provides grounds for appeal of remedies or restrictions imposed while the article probation for the foregoing case was in force. Such appeals or requests to lift or modify such sanctions may be made under the same terms as any other appeal.
:Enacted - L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 10:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Proposed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motion: Liancourt Rocks (September 2015) 

message: :Proposed --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 23:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion by arbitrators (Liancourt Rocks)

message: *I absolutely support this. Articles related (from my view) would be Liancourt Rocks, Liancourt Rocks dispute, Sea of Japan, Sea of Japan naming dispute, Tsushima Island, Tsushima Island dispute, Korea Strait, and possibly Japan–Korea disputes. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Community comments (Liancourt Rocks)

message: Wikimachine was not the sole driver of the dispute "along national line" on Liancourt Rocks. Rather, he was responding to the likes of user:Opp2 and user:komdori who made unreasonable changes to the article, such as placing Japanese flag on top of South Korean flag per alphabetical order, and other provocative behavior. The admins are also to blame for running IP check on users that voted for Dokdo only, but abstaining from such re-count for other users that voted for Liancourt Rocks or Takeshima, until after the vote tally on the naming of the article. This committee has misidentified the antagonists on this dispute. The antagonists are the likes or Opp2, komdori, and LactoseTI who engaged in edit war with other users and forming "fake consensus" by placing edits that went unnoticed for a while and insisting that they had successfully formed a "consensus" among themselves. (Chunbum Park (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I disagree with this arbitration result 

message: :Original discussion
:Enacted - –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 01:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: --A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 17:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motion: Removal of Unused Contentious Topics, Liancourt Rocks (October 2023) 

message: *Oppose -- this is a long-running international dispute that will come back around on Wikipedia. I recommend leaving this in place vs. revisiting the issue from scratch. It's not as if there's a pressing need to lift this.
:--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 17:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community discussion (Liancourt Rocks)