Talk:Archaeology of Ayodhya

message: This is an extremely important article that underlies the Babri Masjid demolition and Ram Temple, a watershed event in recent history. I came here to find the evidence presented on all sides of whether or not there was a temple demolished and the Babri Masjid was built. It has only a single image. What were the archeological finds? Can I see them? The images presented in the court cases?
In general, there are little to no images related to the Babri Masjid and Ram Mandir controversy. I am putting image requests across several articles, if you can help.
--NittyG (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need images!! 

message: Why is there no image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raguks (talk • contribs) 20:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I do not understand reference number 16. How do I verify the claims made by it? Wouldn't it be better to remove those statements that are referenced by it?
Shashi 06:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That must be a footnote, there may be a reference on the page.Bakaman 00:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This article stinks.  It seems to be espousing the 'my people get this thing because we were here first' mentality that is extensively used by people who failed at diplomacy.  It needs to be revamped completely.  Sukiari (talk) 06:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea what the above comment means. I am trying to verify references and basically just copy edit the entries into readable, presentable matter. All help appreciated. :) Nshuks7 (talk) 07:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smelly 

message: , you are edit warring here . As explained in my revert this source does not appear to be a reliable source as per WP:HISTRS. Please explain your reasons for including it here. - Kautilya3 (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashok Pant source 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Archaeology of Ayodhya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060519183415/http://www.deccanherald.com:80/deccanherald/sep08/top.asp to http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/sep08/top.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Archaeology of Ayodhya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050803075538/http://www.hinduonnet.com:80/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=20031107005801300.htm&date=fl2022/&prd=fline& to http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=20031107005801300.htm&date=fl2022/&prd=fline&
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Archaeology of Ayodhya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110826072655/http://www.hinduonnet.com:80/thehindu/op/2003/10/14/stories/2003101400160300.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/op/2003/10/14/stories/2003101400160300.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Archaeology of Ayodhya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021153232/http://www.flonnet.com/fl1514/15141100.htm to http://www.flonnet.com/fl1514/15141100.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As mentioned in the last paragraph of the article, the archaeological findings are no longer disputed since the Supreme Court of India has since evaluated all the evidence so far and made a judgement. The article requires revisions based on these results. Cwarrior (talk) 15:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revise "The ASI findings were disputed"? 

message: I think we should have a separate article called "Archaeology of the Ayodhya Dispute".
This article is about excavations of Ayodhya, broadly. It's like saying that Angkor Wat should only be within the article on archaeology in Angkor (if there was such an article).
I found this article linked from the article "Ayodhya dispute", with the intention of finding archaeological evidence in the surveys ordered of the land underneath the demolished Babri Masjid. The subject of this article is the city of Ayodhya, and the subject of a birthplace of Ram overwhelms the article, and likewise a birthplace of Ram deserves an article by itself, without details of other sites. The significance of this article cannot be understated - It underlies the claims of legitimacy around a watershed event in recent history.
Let me know your thoughts, before I'd separate the articles.
NittyG (talk) 06:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article?  "Archaeology of the Ayodhya Dispute"