Category talk:Articles with connected contributors

message: Does anyone know if there are any administrators in the category? Myrtone
: There is now... – Qxz 14:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable admins 

message: There are around 650 Notable Wikipedians according to this category, I think we should put them in respective categories (Primary Work, Nationality etc). Vjdchauhan 12:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Futher categorization of Notable Wikipedians

message: If you can answer this question or if you have related knowledge on the topic, please join the discussion here.  (Please do not answer here, let's keep the discussion in one place.) Thank you!  Joie de Vivre 16:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How do we verify the identity of a Wikipedian who claims to be the subject of an article?

message: There are around 900 identified notable Wikipedians and I think apart from having this category (Notable Wikipedians) on talk page we need similar category on article page as well. May be we can have several subcategories of new category based on occupation/nationality as well.
Alternatively we can have subcategories to the existing category based on similar line. Your views pls. Vjdchauhan 19:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need parallel category on article page apart from talk page

message: There are some talk pages listed, such as Talk:Celtic Reconstructionist Paganism which are obviously not the talk pages of users, notable or not.  This is a mistake, yes?  Or am I missing something here? Postmodern Beatnik (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is just the opposite, indeed. This list is not for biography articles. On the contrary, it is for articles whose authors have an interest in outside of Wikipedia. However, most of the pages I see now are biographies. --Pot (talk) 12:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable talk pages? 

message: Said person should have edited main articles, have a certain number (say, over 250) and have contributed substantially to the community at Wikipedia, having also mentored or helped out on minor articles, voted on deletions, etc, etc.  By itself, being such a fine Wikipedian and THEN meeting notability requirements...should result on being on this list.  I propose deleting names that do not qualify for BOTH parts of the definition.  It's unseemly as it is.Levalley (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A notable Wikipedian should  be a Wikipedian first 

message: The arrangement of names on the list seems inconsistent at best. For example, why is Talk:Google Current listed under S? Talk:Brion Vibber is listed under B, where the first letter of his surname (used to sort the majority of entries) is V? There are more examples of this. Wheatleya (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently the list stops at "R", there must be something wrong here.  For example, the Talk:Schulze_method page should create an entry here, but it does not. --Pot (talk) 12:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent Sorting and other problems 

message: I made some edits to ITT Corporation and before I started, declared a 
:Conflict of interest --  : I worked for ITT from 1970-1981, at STL and at the Advanced Technology Center. (I made a technical presentation attended by all three CEO's!)
An editor User:IRWolfie- recently added a "Connected Contributor" flag. I have no objection to this, but I'd like to protect my COI statement against future deletes or archiving. Is it possible to put a "do not delete" tag around my CIO declaration? 
It seems to me that the CC tag should allow a declaration, eg (curlies replaced by angles)
<< Connected contributor|Alanf777|Declaration >> Alanf777 (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:ITT Corporation