lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monteregian Hills

message: Neither the Université Laval page linked in the external site section, nor this McGill university page http://www.mcgill.ca/gault/sainthilaire/natural/geology/ gives Mt Orford as a Monteregian. I've thus removed it.--Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin 18:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mt Orford

message: I was just going over the sources, when something struck me. Of all the sources, NONE refer to the Monteregian as "Monteregian Mountains" or "Monteregian Mountain Chain". All use "Monteregian hills". The Canadian Encyclopedia (http://thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0007093 , fifth paragraph), the Britannica (http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9053514/Monteregian-Hills), the University of Massachussets at Lowell (http://faculty.uml.edu/Nelson_Eby/research/monteregian%20hills/monteregian%20hills.htm) as well as various scientifical publication (http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cgi-bin/rp/rp2_abst_e?cjes_e95-109_32_ns_nf_cjes9-95 ) all appear to use "Monteregian Hills". Googling up Monteregian Mountain Chain gives 424 entries ; Monteregian Mountains gives 9, whereas Monteregian Hills give 9440 entries.
Is there any particular reason this page is at Monteregian Mountain Chain?--Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin 03:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree to such a move as it would be the more widely used name. Not much in the way of a mountain chain - just a semi-linear string of erosion resistant stocks of weird rocks of related age and origin. Vsmith 03:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Black Tusk 04:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Certainly looks nothing like any mountain chain I ever heard of. Each of them is isolated, going from 30 meters above sea level to 300, 400 meter all on its own. It's what makes them impressive despite the small size. (And yes, I know this is OR & POV - just commenting to illustrate the point, not planning to put any of this in the article)  --Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin 18:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Vsmith 02:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Monteregian Hills?
Talk:Sony DCR-TRV900

message: As far as I've been able to tell the TRV900 will not act as a analog to digital converter. If you have the TRV900 in VCR mode and connect it to a computer via firewire the computer will only detect the dv input if you are playing or recording a DV tape.
A smaller chip does not alter colour reproduction but results in less light sensitiveness.
The fact, that the TRV950 inhibits even more pixels in its smaller chips does stress this issue even further.
So the pixels are not bigger but smaller.
The rating of light sensitiveness is more of a marketing strategy than a real hint of its low light performance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.55.94.194 (talk) 11:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Hey who chose that craptacular pic? Maybe choose one that clearly displays the camera.
wiki is trash 65.186.176.43 (talk) 03:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That picture is very bad
Talk:List of chess variants/Archive 3

message: What about Ultima? Cant find it on wikipedia at all, but I know it has been mentioned before. Removed maybe? http://www.chessvariants.org/other.dir/ultima.html 
: It is listed as "Baroque chess" here. Andreas Kaufmann 16:51, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultima 

message: I have removed some POV material placed here by an IP.  Here is the information I removed, which was inteposed among other info:
according to the most recent research this [the fact that India is where Chess came from]is not likely so. (See origins of chess and Xiangqi.) 
[...]
Xiangqi - of ancient China, which the most modern research to date (see http://www.yutopian.com/chinesechess/history.html ) surprisingly reveals to have been played centuries before Chaturanga (i.e. by Meng Changjun, some time between 770 and 975 years prior to Chaturanga's popularly recognized date of inception)! See http://www.yutopian.com/chinesechess/stories/meng.html for supporting information.
Basically, this stuff belongs in origins of chess, as a minority viewpoint, and not here. Samboy 18:56, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I have removed some POV material placed here by an IP

message: When was 'parachute chess' first memorialized in print?  Parachuting chess pieces onto a board, or electing to make a move with a piece already landed, is one of the earliest versions of chess where players tried to escape the 'book' and base their play purely on natural ability.  Sure, I remember seeing it in tournament practice (between rounds in the skittle room) in 1975, but I don't recall anybody describing it in a magazine or anything.  This predates Transcendental Chess and Fischer Random Chess by a half dozen years or so.  It was around the same year when people started arguing about the benefits of abbreviated algebraic notation as opposed to expanded algebraic notation, and comparing these to the benefits of descriptive notation.  If you were too young to be privy to these debates, it's a shame.
: There are a number of chess variant, which match to what you described, for example:
: * Unachess
: * Placement chess
: Do you remember if there were any restrictions on where a piece can be parachuted? Andreas Kaufmann 10:44, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  History behind parachute chess
Talk:Force MD's

message: I was a producer for Force MD's, that is how I know this article is fact. I am the reference.
:you're not the producer Force MD's, i am.
:well actually i'm not, but surely you see that you simply claiming to be producer, whether you are or not does not make for a valid reference. also, if you are, that gives you a Conflict of interest--Jac16888 21:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Aaron ibn Sargado

message: The addition of HaKohen (or even "ha-Cohen") into this name, when the English sources have Aaron ibn Sargado is unusual and therefore controversial. This kind of renaming needs to go via Wikipedia:Requested moves. It is easy enough to add the RM template and request a move. If you cannot follow the instructions I or other editors would be happy to help. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted to page title as per sources
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SLSB

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See SLSB's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 21:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request
Talk:Molly McKay

message: Bearian 21:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Coat of arms of São Tomé and Príncipe

message: The bird on the left looks a lot like a peregrine to me... Enterprisey (talk!) 03:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bird on the left 

message: Is there symbolism for the star or the yellow background? I couldn't find any sources for the subject.
 About the yellow background, I can only assume it represents the same as in the flag which stands for  the yellow stands for the "tropical sun and cocoa" (which make up about ~70% of the entire exports of the country). יובל מוזס (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of symbolism
Talk:Coat of arms of the Canary Islands

message: I'm not sure why this coat of arms is included in the 'Coats of arms with clouds' category, as the seven figures on the shield are not clouds but islands, representing the seven Canary Islands. This can be seen in the Spanish wikipedia, with the official description: "en campo de azur trae siete islas de plata ..." , this is, 'in a field of azur has seven islands in silver' --Joane (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. --Error (talk) 01:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Juggernaut (wrestler)

message: I have been trying to find it the exact date when Juggernaut was stripped of the ECCW Heavyweight Championship.  Everywhere I looked and it remains unclear when this happened.  Mr. C.C. (talk) 04:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exact Date Juggernaut Was Stripped 
Talk:Seal of Palau

message: Good day. Palau's seal image does not match the official images. In fact, the seal of parliament is placed throughout Wikipedia. Whereas the stamp of the President of the country is placed on the passport. It is required to replace the current version with the real one.
https://www.facebook.com/palaumission/
https://www.palaugov.pw Returntoedenblr (talk) 13:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palau's seal image does not match the official images
Talk:Seal of the Federated States of Micronesia

message: So... what exactly are we looking at?  A coconut sprouting in the ocean?  The link provided gives no description. --Eddylyons (talk) 20:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. No one's home.  I also looked at the reference for this.  It's Flags of the World and doesn't provide any description of the coat of arms for Micronesia.  There is a link at Flags of the World to the constitution of the FSM, but it only describes the flag. I recommend deletion of this page as it provides no verifiable information, including the graphic. --Eddylyons (talk) 02:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: We need to know or publish it who is the designer of the pohnpei official seal sign.. 74.132.102.147 (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminder
Talk:.338-378 Weatherby Magnum

message: 1.  The 338 nm is a rimless cartridge, not rimmed. Follow the link provided.
2.  If the 338-378 Wby has the 378 Wby as its parent, the 338-378's rim diameter should match the 378 Wby, it does not.
ELR Researcher (talk) 00:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data errors
Wikipedia talk:Reader Knows Nothing

message: What exactly is the point of this essay?--$UIT 21:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm getting sick of going to pages where the editors write the articles like the assume that everybody that reads the article already knows what everything is. The writing is so basic that that if you aren't a fan or familiar with the object or person, you don't know what the hell they're talking about in the article. I've tried searching this or something like it, but I couldn't come up with anything. So I decided to start this one. It's how I write and it's worked out great for me. --VorangorTheDemon 11:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of people from New England

message: New Hampshire is one of the six New England states. Why no list of people from New Hampshire.Sw124 22:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should David Byrne really be on this list? I know he was at RISD, but it was just for a year...
BTW the Connecticutian's post here amuses me. They make it sound like CT wants to secede from New England!
Flizzjkzaop (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Byrne?
Talk:Jasmine (disambiguation)

message: *Jasmin St. Claire, a porn star and wrestler, (note variant spelling).
*Jasmine Sinclair, a British bondage model.
Their names (whether they are their real names or stage names) sound pretty much identical. They are mostly in the form of "Jasmine" "Saint" "Claire". But after having looked at the articles about both women, I have understood they are different people. JIP | Talk 19:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Janine

message: How about adding a link to Janine Lindemulder, who is often referred to only as Janine? Or is there a reason to not add? 82.141.119.195 (talk) 00:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, because there is no article titled "Janine (name)". Or if there is, it's not here. 85.217.50.139 (talk) 00:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jay (given name)

message: The article states that Jay is often a nickname for George and Gerald.  Really?  That seems pretty farfetched.  Can someone provide multiple examples that would confirm this claim as a rule not just a matter of a few singular exceptions? ("Encyclopedic content must be verifiable.")  Poldy Bloom (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  George?  Gerald?
Talk:Rockhampton Region

message: Why was this moved from Rockhampton Regional Council? It's the official council name as far as I can tell. Bongomanrae (talk) 02:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is inline with Somerset Region for example and other local government areas of Queensland.  Its about the geographic area rather than the government organisation which administers it. - Shiftchange (talk) 03:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved?
Talk:Mont Rougemont

message: That is, in no way, form, or shape, Rougemont - Rougemont, seen from the south-south-west (Saint-Grégoire)would have a higher summit to the center-left, then slowly sloping downward toward the right, without any high summit there. I'm 99.9% positive the mountain on that picture is actually Saint-Hilaire seen from Saint-Grégoire, with the Sugar Loaf to the left, the Dieppe/Rocky just besides it, and the eastern summit to the right. Will glance through my pics for an actual pic of Rougemont--Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Picture
Talk:Bristol Mall

message: Bristol Mall is the only mall in the Commonwealth of Virginia that serves the Tri Cities.
It is notable for its location, and stores.
While not big, it is very popular with people from TN and SW Virginia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Etittle1978 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:The Bedford

message: The Bedford is widely known as "The Bedford Arms" and is still referred to by that name by many people. Jud 23:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems to stem from the fact that it's called "The Bedford Arms" in the A-Z. I still maintain that's incorrect, and that this entry should reflect that. But I'm not going to get all anal over it :-) Davorg 07:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tenno Sho

message: Could anybody try to give us the past race history of each of the two Tenno Sho races? Thanks. Bigtop 23:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past races 

message: *see Romanization_of_Japanese,Sokuon,Yōon
*1947 spring winner
:*オーライト in Japanease
:*ŌRAITO in Hepburn romanization
:*maybe 'O Lite' is appropriate, as 'O' means 'king', and 'Lite' comes from Diolite;O lite is sired by St.Lite who was sired by Diolite.
:*but in Japanese,'All Right' can be written as 'オーライト'(ŌRAITO).
:*or,'O Light','Oh,wright',are indistinguishable to us, because there is no distinction in the pronunciation of R and L in Japanese.
*as well as 1943 spring winner 'Grand Lite'. 
*1942 spring winner Minami Mor
:*ミナミモア in Japanease
:*MINAMI MOA in Hepburn romanization
:*maybe 'Minami Mor' is appropriate, as 'Minami' means 'south', and 'Mor' comes from Shian Mor;Minami Mor is sired by Shian Mor.
:*but in Japanese,'More' can be written as 'モア'(Moa).
*1948 spring winner Cyma is very difficult.
:*シーマー in Japanease
:*Shīmā  in Hepburn romanization (pronounced as 'seemer')
:*I have no idea what 'Shīmā' stands for.
:*possibly, family name of his owner, Mr.Shimada could serve origin of the naming.
:*'seemer','Schiemer'(like Franz Schiemer),'Seamer'
:*but in Family Tables of Racinghorses Vol.IV,'Cyma' is adopted.(However we usually write as 'Shīma' or 'Saima' for Cyma.)
--reign-sign(dnt read 'n') (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is difficult writing in English Japanese name 

message: I propose that this page be split into separate pages, one for each race, in line with other Group One races.
The existing page could be kept, to provide background to the link betwen the races. (JockeyColours (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split into two pages
Talk:Lt. Fairfax and Lt. Carstairs

message: I hereby propose to merge Lt. Fairfax and Lt. Carstairs to one article, titled "Fairfax and Carstairs" (or possibly "Lts. Fairfax and Carstairs", other proposals are welcome).
The reason is that these articles seem to have been created with identical text except for the characters' and actors' names.  (At the moment, the text isn't completely identical anymore: all the more reason for merger.)  Another reason is that the characters themselves seem to have very little distinguishing features except for their names; none are included in the articles at the moment.
I am open to suggestions.  If none are made, I'll proceed with the merger in a week or two. Phaunt 23:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing other 'Allo 'allo articles, it would be consistent to include ranks.  Maybe "Lt. Fairfax and Lt. Carstairs" is a good option.  Phaunt 07:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I have edited this as the article stated their last appearance was in 'Rene of the Gypsies' but with a guest appearance in 'A Winkle in Time'. If they made an appearance, guest or otherwise, THAT is their last appearance! Smurfmeister (talk) 13:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Last appearance?

message: 'Bumbly' is probably a nickname: it isn't a British name, but does sound like part of the public school tradition of ridiculous nicknames, which often overtook actual forenames, at least in literature.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.155.229 (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Carstairs's Name
Talk:1984 Portuguese Grand Prix

message: How come Renault entered three cars in this race (driven by Tambay, Warwick and Streiff)? John Anderson  (talk) 23:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Renault were giving their test driver (Streiff) some race experience. Back in those days teams could enter extra cars, but they were usually ineligible to score points. DH85868993 (talk) 15:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Renaults? 
Category talk:High Priests of Israel

message: is not a real person according to UV at the Latin wiki. For this reason the 'Sacerdotes' (priest) category was removed. Please help me to put it back in. Thank you.--Jondel (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you are referring to this edit, and UV has responded at :la:Disputatio_Usoris:UV#Aaron. – Fayenatic London 06:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Aaron]]
Talk:1983 British Grand Prix

message: Both Lauda and Johansson start the race 15th: there is a mistake there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.189.245.83 (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:Taper

message: Hmm. I came to this article having just read about 'tapers' being used for lighting purposes and wondering what they were, and instead I find something on the thickness of cymbals. I would have thought that 'taper' is, by definition, something that thins out, so I would not exclusively donate this article to cymbal-making. Tapers for lighting sound very interesting and like they have nothing to do with the common definition at all, for instance. I'll just Google this time, I suppose... --195.92.67.65 05:32, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  'tapers' being used for lighting purposes 

message: Surely the most prevalent use of the word "taper" is a person who collects tapes of live music performances.  
71.141.254.22 08:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "taper" 

message: Tapering is a word used in a lot of Semiconductor research papers. I couldn' find this meaning in the disambiguation page. --129.13.186.1 (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like tapering, in this context, means etching taper shaped holes (or wells) into the semiconductor (e.g. silicon substrate) --129.13.186.1 (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tapering in semiconductors
Talk:1983 South African Grand Prix

message: Quoted from Notes-section.
Weren't 1981 Caesar Palace Grand Prix a 3-way battle between C. Reutemann, N. Piquet and J. Laffite? With Reutemann 49pts, Piquet 48pts and Laffite 43pts. In my books a "3-way battle" in this context means that three drivers have still mathematical chances to become the respective season's World Champion when entering the last GP of season. I don't know how you Wikipedians interpret it, but as a lifetime F1 enthusiast I beg to differ to the article's claim about 1974.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.30.178.107 (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe you are correct. I have updated the article accordingly. (Rather than just changing "first 3-way battle since 1974" to "first 3-way battle since 1981" I removed the clause entirely - I didn't think something occurring after only one year of not occurring was particularly notable). Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First 3-way battle since 1974"
Talk:Bobby Duncum

message: ...who wrestled [Bob Backlund] for the WWWF title after Backlund "lost" to [Antonio Inoki]and the promotion "had" to make the title vacant when Inoki refused to accept the belt?  If anyone knows, I would appreciate reading more about that tournament.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.60.230 (talk) 23:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the same Duncum 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. No need for the dab per WP:ONEOTHER, will swap and convert the dab to a redirect, add a hatnote to Jr.'s page. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 16:47, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bobby Duncum Sr. →  – The elder Duncum always wrestled as "Bobby Duncum" and the younger Duncum always wrestled as "Bobby Duncum Jr.", so the use of "Sr" for the elder Duncum is unnecessary. McPhail (talk) 11:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 January 2022
Talk:Cadrawd Calchfynydd

message: I'd like to know the written source(s) for the precise dates given here. Enaidmawr 23:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a person of whom nothing is known (nor can be known) but his name and place in a genealogy.  The answer to Enaidmawr  is that the dates can be no more than a guess.  As much as is known appears in the article Calchfynydd.  I have accordingly redirected this article there.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting
Talk:1982 South African Grand Prix

message: For whatever reason Roberto Guerrero is listed as a DNQ but he did not take part in any practice session. Morris Nunn withdrew the Ensign car, scratching the entry for Guerreo on the grounds that Guerreo was not in a fit mental or physical state to make his F1 debut. In reality FOCA side of the entry was in trouble as too many cars were entered for the event. 31 cars were entered while regulations only allowed 30 cars to take part in qualifying. A pre-qualifying seasion on thursday should have solved this problem but the drivers strike prevented this session from happening. By withdrawing his entry Nunn solved a lot of problems. There are also stories that Guerrero was withdrawn from this event because he was still under contract with the Maurer F2 team and Maurer team boss filed an injunction. MMS, RejectsF1
I think we should scratch Guerrero as a DNQ but I think he should be listed as the team was present for the GP weekend and intended to take part. I think we should list Guerrero either as a DNP or WD. Jahn1234567890 (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the entry was withdrawn (which is confirmed by Mike Lang's Grand Prix! Vol 4), I'd vote for "WD". DH85868993 (talk) 00:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that should be fine. I will update all relevant articles. Jahn1234567890 (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberto Guerrero
Talk:Orochimaru (Naruto)

message: Writing style and grammar needs to be polished. Anyone who is greatly familiar with the topic, please help fix this article.
EmGaGa (talk) 09:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's kinda a common issue nowdays. I would suggest being bold.Tintor2 (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar