lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bréguet 4

message: The Whole Breguet WWI bomber/escort fighter genre needs re-vamping to clear the mud.
I propose a single article to cover all the various Type IV's, Breguet-Michelins, BUC, BM, BUM etc as they are all derivatives of a single aircraft type. The only question is what to call the article.
I suggest 'Breguet Military Pusher Aircraft 1912-1918' Abit long winded but covers everything that would be in the article. a series of re-directs would point people in the right direction.Petebutt (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: UNTITLED
Talk:Bréguet 5

message: Surely naming of aircraft articles should reflect the actual name/designation used by the manufacturer/customer! Breguet did not use the French government inposed designation prefix Bre. until the Bre.14, and this should probably be in roman numerals as the Bre.XIV.
So please can we have the correct names for these aircraft
;-
* Breguet Type I
* Breguet Type II
* Breguet Type III
* Breguet Type IV
* Breguet Type V
* Breguet Type VI
* Breguet Type VII
* Breguet Type VIII
* Breguet Type IX
* Breguet Type X
* Breguet Type XI
* Breguet Type XII
* Breguet Type XIII
* Breguet-Michelin BM / BUM
** Breguet-Michelin Type V
** Breguet-Michelin Type VI
then
* Breguet Bre.14  (Bre.XIV) etc.etc.
Petebutt (talk) 03:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Petebutt; since this is a more general issue that impacts a whole range of articles and not just this one, I'll respond to this over at WT:AIR. Cheers! --Rlandmann (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming Convention
Talk:St Mary's Church, Astbury

message: As far as I know the ring has been enlarged by another 2 bells (late 1990s) to form a major of 8 bells. -- Ipwaz2003 (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for this? It would be good to add it. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a small addition to deal with this but would prefer to have more details and dates from a better source. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bells 

message: The history section would greatly benefit from an introductory sentence "The origins of the church are unclear..." (or something similar), which sets the tone for the next two sentences. Otherwise, the prose just dumps us in mid-stream as it were...Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Done. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tuppence.... 

message: I think the location is a key piece of info that ought to come earlier in the article.  If you can't make it an own section, why not just put it at the front of History?  This would be a very normal way of writing about a building or ruin or the like.  If the village location has changed over time, then I guess you could expand the discussion into an actual section on location.
It seems like some discussion of the village size and church size and how the church served the community would be relevant.  For instance, was it just a basic parish church or some added importance?  Any relations to aspects of history other than the Roundheads (like relations of town and nobility?)TCO (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The location is given in the first sentence.  The coordinates and Grid Reference of the church are in the infobox.  The size and history of the village is not relevant IMO.  The size of the church is not available to me on the evidence available; if it becomes available, (or if you can find it), it can be added. If there were more history available on the evidence available to me, it would have been included.  I'm not sure what you mean by relations of town and nobility.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: removing page from watchlist.  No sweat, man.TCO (talk) 21:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  location 

message: Many thanks to William Ball, M.A., Churchwarden & Secretary for providing information on Captain Alfred Hutton's grave and his memorial tablet, located in the chancel of the church, also for taking photos of the grave and the tablet. Later I would like to insert one sentence on Hutton in the article. Ulrich von Lichtenstein (talk) 07:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred Hutton's grave
Talk:St Oswald's Church, Lower Peover

message: I have today altered the description of the church's architectural style to idiosyncratic from Gothic on the grounds that the church is a timber framed building which whilst dating from the period when Gothic is the only style being used, is in practice sufficiently different not to really wear the designation accurately. Certainly this conforms to the material offered to visitors in the church, which I visited yesterday, which similarly declines to accept a specific architectural style. Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair enough but the tower is certainly Gothic.  There's room for both in the info box.  Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Architectural style(s)
Talk:Serei Saophoan Municipality

message: Isn't this camp in violation of various local laws?  if individuals aged over 18 are being placed their against their will, even by their parents, it is kidnapping.  That's not even to touch on the inmates being forced to "self-criticse" and apparently being forced to beat up other inmates.  Toby Douglass (talk) 10:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately yes. It's against local law and various international treaties that Cambodia has signed. And yet it still happens. Paxse (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Coton in the Elms

message: The BBC article contradicts itself in stating that the location furthest from the sea is 1 mile SE of the farm which put it at a different farm, in fact closer to Hollows Farm or West View Farm. And why choose a seemingly arbitrary point between Flint and Neston in the Dee estuary to begin the measurement from that area? All rather dubious! Geopersona (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Furthest from the sea
Talk:Polysaccharide encapsulated bacteria

message: The section about pseudomonas that was recently added was copied from http://www.horizonpress.com/hsp/books/pseudo.html and a copyright violation.  In any case, I think the material would have been more appropriate for the pseudomonas article. Nephron  T|C 19:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudomonas
Talk:Sacramento Police Department

message: === If you want more information on the article go to http://www.cityofsacramento.org/Police 
If you want to see specific arrests made you can go to https://www.policearrests.com/departments/CA/Sacramento/Sacramento-Police-Department/ 
By adding in these links people who come across this page will be able to get more information about this department since not much information is given. A lot of information is missing in this article that can also be found on their official page and can be helpful for someone doing research or just being curious. ===
Syedaa123 (talk) 18:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

message: Busses were disabled, and then terrorists boarded and shot everyone. Retired police officer maybe. Investigation to where the kids went. 2600:1017:B12A:3D67:0:50:6FA3:4801 (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disablers are owned by police officers. Had a hand in that Greyhound bus massacre.
Talk:Electronics For You

message: I have created the page on electronics For You to inform the readers of wikipedia about one of the oldest technology publishing house of India. There are so many references about the group and the magazine on the Internet. If there could be pages on PCQuest, India Today then no page on EFY simply means depriving the WIKI community from the magazines material.
Also the piece I creates is based on the history, I did not make any claims, so there is no question on the neutrality of the article. Also I have added references so its is authentic info.
--arnieswap 11.11, 28 July 2007
A lot of promo material was added on this article which led to removal of most of the content. I have re-inserted content and referenced every point I have made.
--DI1IN, 24 January 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by To.dilin (talk • contribs) 06:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Utsav Gold

message: Hum hai rahi pyar ke
Jaan tere naa Md Arig (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie 

message: Dirlis ertugrul gazi world record so please telecast this channel Md Arig (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial
Talk:Battle of Gefrees

message: ...about a little-known battle. 
Question - why was Junot's cavalry unable to charge? Tirailleur 14:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His cavalry was mainly made up of hastily conscripted troops, most of whom had only just learnt to ride a horse. Many of the riders were too inexperienced to hold a consistent line whilst in full gallop, which meant that they attacked the Austrian lines at a trot, or like in the American Indians in the Wild West, a loose pack. Either way, they were unable to break a line of well disciplined infantry. Centy</font> – [reply]• contribs – 15:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article 

message: Can somebody perhaps clarify? I feel this error has been taken over from the German article, which also tries to place Gefrees into Saxony.
I was of the opinion that Gefrees at that time was part of the Bayreuth-Brandenburg Duchy?
:No Gefrees wasn't in Saxony, but the majority of the conflict took part on the Bohemia-Saxony border. However if you read the article you will realise that the Austrians pushed the Confederation troops back somewhat resulting in the key battle taking place at Gefrees. However virtually all the other engagements except the opening invasion of Bohemia took place inside Saxony. There isn't an agreed name for what this part of the War of the Fifth Coalition should be called, so I just referred to it as the war in Saxony rather or the Saxon front. Centy – [reply]• contribs – 16:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatest battle of this war in Saxony? Gefrees surely wasn't / isn't located in Saxony. 
Talk:Irish Open (golf)

message: Currently Carroll's International and Carroll Sweet Afton Tournament link to Irish Open (golf) which has the results of those tournaments. It seems to me that these were really different tournaments and ought to be on a separate page (Carroll's International, I suggest). Happy to do it if no one complains. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carroll's International
Talk:The Man in the Morgue

message: This article is proof that Wikipedia needs a built-in spell-checker, both for those who write articles and for those who need to edit three or more times because they keep finding more and more mistakes. Sleepsong 05:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: is it dr graham leger or dr graham legiere? both are used in the article... tv.com lists leger, imdb lists legiere. the link to the official site does not exist... can someone confirm the correct name? 77.97.110.57 (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: never mind, i've done it myself. leger was correct, i also updated the link to the official site. 77.97.110.57 (talk) 14:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  what's the right name?
Talk:Wanted (2009 film)

message: What is this, an advert for the Film?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.209.181.185 (talk) 19:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since an editor just asked for a reasoning for the tags I placed on the article, I came here to give one, but I see the issue has been around since October 2009. The synopsis is written like an advertisement by the film-makers; in fact, it's almost hard to believe it hasn't been copy-pasted from a movie review site. I'm restoring the tags now, since the issues are pretty blatant. KaySL (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I do agree that the tone of the synopsis maybe a bit inappropriate, but how does this come under advertisement. References are provided for all box office figures and other things and I am sure nothing is a copy paste here. I don't understand how is this an advert? And what's this "in-universe" tag for? You didn't explain about it.  Managerarc[Talk] 16:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It comes under advertisement because the synopsis sounds like something right off a promotional site or article, like what you'd expect from your average official movie site. Though perhaps the advertisement aspect is borderline, the tone is definitely way off and needs changing, therefore I've tagged it as such. As for the in-universe aspect, again the synopsis is written with a complete lack of context and lacks a real-world frame of reference. I think once the tone is dealt with, the other issues will fall away at the same time. KaySL (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the plot have been re-written, I don't find any problem with the tone now. Managerarc[Talk] 11:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it looks a fair bit better now, so I've removed the problem templates. Nice job. KaySLtalk 15:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've tagged this as 'written like an advert' as the plot section is quite biased (e.g. "... is a hardcore gangster who will do anything for money"), but I haven't seen the film, so wouldn't be able to summarise it. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged for advert 
Talk:Ulster Senior Club Hurling Championship

message: The WP:COMMONNAME of this competition is Ulster Senior Club Hurling Championship. The term "GAA" is superfluous (no-one else organises hurling competitions) and the article should be moved back from this misnamed page, to which it was moved without discussion by an editor who has similarly displaced many GAA articles. Brocach (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moved without consensus
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Logic/New articles

message: The television series is merely a proposed project, subject to existing WP guidelines on things in the future(WP:FUTURE#Wikipedia is not a crystal_ball). Also, there is little documentation to verify article content except the producer's promotional literature, so it appears to be advertising (WP:SPAM). Inclusion is premature until it airs, and inclusion will be helped by availability of published reviews for reference and citation. I did very much like Dawson in Hogan's Heroes. Hotfeba 17:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Enemies of Reason'' 

message: No sure how this article on a psychological testing instrument fall under this project. Term logical does appear in the article, but besides the listing of qualities, there is no explanation of relevance and little of note for philosophy/logic inclusion. Hotfeba 19:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why it's just "for consideration." If you sift through the list that the bot makes, there really are only a few at a time that are close. At this stage it is better to be inclusive. Being in this list doesn't even imply that it belongs in WikiProject Logic. These are just close, and therefore may benefit from this group's attention. Gregbard 01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood. My comments are only of record, and only of the most questionable (at least to me) items listed, to show that someone was paying attention. Others are free to edit the named articles, so that inclusion appears more reasonable. Hotfeba 19:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument 

message: Are any of the new articles on this page actually logic articles? — Charles Stewart (talk) 06:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:Nikolai Slichenko

message: Does anyone have the source for the claim that "one of the stars in the Taurus constellation has been named for Nikolai Slichenko"? This claim seems to contradict information on star names from International Astronomical Union. See here: http://www.iau.org/public/naming/#stars and here: http://www.iau.org/public/buying_star_names/
Lorca2 (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Deuteronomium (band)

message: The name of the brother of Manu Lehtinen seems to be Jarno and not Jarmo. (according to the finnish version of the page, and some of the articles on the net) Jarmo Lehtinen is a rallye driver.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.57.67.241 (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surprise

message: Fundamental Surprise is a surprise that indicates a personal or group mindset which became irrelevant or misleading in interpreting new realities. It is caused by disparity between the fast growing rate of complexity and disruptive changes in our reality and the sluggishness of reframing our mindsets. 
:I don't really understand why this was on the dab page, or what it's getting at.  Feel free to replace it, if there is actually an article to be disambiguated here.  Cheers Dina 17:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article
Talk:Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales

message: Information on the Department of Dialogue and Unity, which is apparently one of the most important departments within the bishops's conference, would be a good thing.  ADM (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Department of Dialogue and Unity

message: I may have tried to change this before, but according to the Conference website the Vice President of the Conference is Archbishop Kelly of Liverpool. Any way of finding out who is for definite?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.203.54 (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: VP
Talk:Luton Town MIGs

message: I'm not sure whether this should remain on the article or not. I have left it for now, but it is from The Real Football Factories series on Bravo and so surely is copyrighted? Maybe someone else will know for sure. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The You tube video

message: This article contains a lot of details of violent incidents at LTFC matches but does not show anything attributing them to the Luton Town MIGs. Material not directly related to the subject in question should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.32.223.126 (talk) 10:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go with you on that (mostly) - the Bedford today article explicitly mentions MIG involvement, but many of the other sources don't. I'd hazard that many news sources purposefully (and rightly) avoid distinguishing one group of morons from another when their loutish behavior is distinguishable only by a self conferred moniker and/or some badly drawn tattoos. Its simpler to lump every such gang in Britain together under the umbrella terms; thugs and hooligans. Therefore many of the sources about violence at Luton matches probably are about crimes perpetrated by MIGs, but haven't been described as such to avoid giving them any credibility or notoriety. That being said, this is an encyclopedia, and its best for us to stick to the facts, where we can find them. The Bedford source which names them - and the associated article text can stay, whilst other passages about non-specific violence can probably safely be removed with consensus. Edaham (talk) 03:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

text: It's a bit of a superfluous list anyway if each entry serves only to underscore the fact that they are violent on a regular basis. Edaham (talk) 03:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

text: Concur, at least there should be suitable section headings.  All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken a few bits off today that were very thin -  If we take off everything that doesn't mention MIGs we get a very small (but better) article. I'm happy to do that and I think that that's the consensus, but I'll give it a while first. Joe (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Deviation from article title
Talk:Grassroots Campaigns, Inc.

message: For now, I'm going to refrain from contributing to this page - since I've written so much about the subject and am unfamiliar with wikipedia protocols for this sort of thing. but I think there should be prominent mention of GCI's relation the Fund for Public Interest Research and PIRG family. Also, there should be reference to the book Activism Inc, which directly addresses GCI.  Bencampo - can you contact me at greg dot bloom at gmail dot com? --Greggish 18:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added Advert tags as the History section lists quite many numbers without independent citation. Current Work section is based upon the organization's website. Also, members of this organization seem to be adding tags to other organization wikis (see Common Cause) to indicate they have worked for them before. How is this relevant? Phaedrus79 17:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: According to the Berkeley, California office, it's only legally for profit so that it can funnel money to the Democratic Party and other organizations more easily. This is very different than a business. Since this is something I learned from a primary source we need to find references for it. SteveSims (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Business

message: Another note is that they (PIRG and GCI) do not hire directors without college degrees. While this may seem normal the problem is that they constantly hire people with no canvassing experience who by not fund raising enough develop a "deficit" with the company. They literally end up owing the company money.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.192.242 (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More Business

message: I think so, given that there are 3 diff states listed.. Others' thoughts? -aNon 12.144.160.217 (talk) 21:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should lede reflect criticism/lawsuits? 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 
Talk:Stefan Lorant

message: —1)—"Stefan Lorant: Godfather of Photojournalism," by Michael Hallett, Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 2005. 
—2)—"The International Center of Photography Encyclopedia of Photography," New York City: A Pound Press Book, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1984. "Lorant, Stefan," Pages 310-311.
Davidjmarcou 04:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:ODTAA

message: Work in progress to be completed GraemeMoughan 18:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a problem with title of this article, but I hope that an admin can come by and fix that.  tdmg 18:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it the title is quite correct. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction
Talk:Pentax ME F

message: On this article, the Pentax ME F is said to be the first AF SLR camera, then just below this paragraph it says that Polaroid made the first AF SLR camera.
I assume the mistake is that the Pentax ME F is the first AF SLR camera with interchangeable lenses, not just the first AF SLR. Can anyone clarify? Nabeel_co 18:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it or is it not the first AF camera? 

message: I did not say that the Pentax ME F was the first AF SLR camera. I said that it "was the first autofocus (AF) 35 mm SLR camera." The ME F was the first AF SLR camera to use 35 mm film. The Polaroid SX-70 Sonar OneStep was the first AF SLR of any format. The distinction is subtle, but important. Paul1513 16:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First AF 35 mm SLR camera