lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gallagher (disambiguation)

message: At seemingly extreme personal peril, I have attempted to make the various Gallagher pages conform to what appears to be the common consensus for disambiguation here on Wikipedia.  For examples, see John Daly (disambiguation) and James Black (disambiguation).
*The Gallagher page now redirects to Gallagher (disambiguation), instead of vice versa.
*The text on the old Gallagher disambiguation page that described the origins of the surname has been moved to the Gallagher (surname) page.
*A link to the Gallagher (surname) page has been added to the Gallagher (disambiguation) page.
This effort has been made in good faith.  Hopefully this will satisfy all interested parties.  Extreme Unction 13:13, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me just add that the original Gallagher list, until June 2005, was rather longer -- see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gallagher&oldid=15109229 . <KF> 21:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another attempt at cleanup
Talk:Historian of the U.S. House of Representatives

message: Was there a good reason to move this article from a full title to a version that includes initials?  It seems wiser to have the initialism redirect to the full name.  -James Howard (talk/web) 13:14, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  Honestly, I don't know what I was thinking.  I'll kill the redirect.  -Markles 15:57, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect badness?
Talk:Barry Davies

message: I started this article. The quotes included are sourced from and repeated in a number of websites, but I was unable to find definitive sources for many of them - ie. dates, precise matches. If anyone has any books or anything to fully corroborate or reject any of these it would be much appreciated... - 81.100.216.53 13:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lady Beware

message: Why is this film listed as controversial (:Category:Controversial films)? What's controversial about it? — Frecklefoot | Talk 13:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the nudity? (I dunno; I'm guessing.) --Jacquelyn Marie 01:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial film?

message: The last paragraph is inherently POV unless we can get some sort of citation for what it alleges. --Jacquelyn Marie 01:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I'm a bit slow-witted but since this paragraph has only a few lines, why not change it to remove anything that is not NPOV? JM.Beaubourg 05:23, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do that now, but what I was hoping for was that someone would come up with the citation I was asking for. :) But we've given that enough time. Jacqui ★ 06:25, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Mago Barca

message: The Carthage article refers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthage#Second_Sicilian_War) to a Mago Barca who undertook a journey of exploration through the Sahara desert. Is this the same person or an earlier relative? The context in the Carthage article seems to suggest he lived in the 7th-5th century BC. Dysmorodrepanis 13:56, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This Mago lived a couple of hundred years after that, so they probably aren't the same person; and as Mago is a given name, and Barca a soubriquet, they probably aren't related, either. Moonraker12 (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: exploration

message: It seems improbable that Mago could have died in 203 BC and also have left Italy with his army in 202 BC. I don't know which is right, only that it seems impossible for both to be right.
Tupelo the typo fixer (talk) 13:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible contradiction 
Talk:Democratic Party (Romania)

message: Apparently, the Democrats are not socialists anymore...  bogdan | Talk 14:15, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: However they are not "populists" either, or at least they don't declare themselves as such :-) I'm sure there's a better term for their ideology. IulianU 21:27, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They were never in any of those categories, not as socialists and especially not as populists. The best way to describe them is centre-left, as the PNL is centre-right and Alianţa D.A. is centrist. -Voievod 00:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The PD is in no way centre-left. Since Boc has become its leader, it has becoming increasingly right-wing, as can be seen by its desire to create a "strong formation/pole of the right wing in Romania". I would be tempted to classify PD as firmly "right wing" and quite conservative and increasingly populist, but I think the best neutral classification is "centre-right". PNL can't really be classified on the left-right spectrum, since it is a liberal party akin to the Lib Dems of the UK. The DA Alliance doesn't really have a common ideology anymore, but it is broadly centrist (though I've read its policy in depth, and in the social sense, it is quite conservative right-wing, particularly on the separation between church and state).  Ronline ✉ 09:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Now that's a bit hard. I'm aware of the fact that the PNL has shifted from centre-right to centre (that's why I like them so much nowadays) and that the PD has shifted from centre-left to centre-right, but it's inaccurate to call right-wing. BTW, the PSD is much more socially conservative than the PD (PSD = Old Guard of the PCR/FSN) so you should cut the PD some slack. -- Voievod 19:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i propose to merge the articles, because, technically, PD changed the name to PD-L, and then they merged with PLD! as a result, is not a new party, but the same party with the name changed. ES Vic (talk) 11:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like all other wikipedia, including the Romanian disagree that it is the same party. --Oddeivind (talk) 14:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The page is outdated and requires an update on the current position and values of the democratic party of Romania in the country's present political climate. Based on the other topics within this talk page, and update on this page would provide clarity the population of Romania that the respective democratic parties represent. Updating the page would be able to increase the status of the page and serve its wikipedic purpose of being an informative source.Kp1004 (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you know about any reliable source we can use for the update? Thank you. --MarioGom (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Update
Talk:Biphase mark code

message: I made the picture with Dia, so I could export it in SVG as well. I did it, but I got a wrong output, as you can see in :Image:Bmc.svg: I don't know whether it is a problem of the programme or of wikipedia's engine. Anyway I used the PNG version you see in the article. Alessio Damato 14:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: SVG picture

message: Can we really consider this to be a proper noun? I think the page should be named 'Biphase mark code' instead. This would match the other line codes here, as well as Wiki policy.--Ktims 07:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Alessio Damato 08:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: Bot wants sources. All I have is Stallings, which doesn't mention BMC, only Manchester and DManchester. Anyone got some reputable material we can reference?
:: Not sure if these help: google scholar search result (KH MOREY 1962, RC HANSEN 1962, etc.)
:: Ezekiel Bhasker 21:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: Finally, BMC coded signals have zero average DC voltage, 
This is not correct. Average DC value of 1 is zero, but each 0 gives DC shift compensated only by next 0. Thus zero DC voltage can be achieved only in series with even number of 0. In the series of multiple 1 with a single 0 there is a non-compensated DC voltage. The FM0 encoding have the same frequency characteristic (it differs from BMC by opposite rule of encoding - transitions between bits and additional transitions in the middle of 0). Both of them have bandwidth from 0 to F. Manchester Encoding and Differential Manchester Encoding are free of this problem - they have bandwidth from F/2 to F.
FM0, Biphase mark, Manchester and Differential Manchester can be grouped together. They are all self-synchronized two-level encodings. They differs by rules of placement tranisition between two levels:
FM0 have transition between each bits and transition in the middle of the 0.
Biphase mark have transition between each bits and transition in the middle of the 1.
Manchester have transition in the middle of each bit and transition between same bits.
Differential Manchester have transition in the middle of each bit and transition before 0.
195.140.182.162 08:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DC characteristic
Talk:AES3

message: Protocol section says that 20 bit audio samples are standard. Well perhaps this has come from SD-SDI television standards where standard AES audio packets are limited to 20 bit audio. Extended Data Packets can follow standard 20bit audio packets in SD-SDI - these contain an extra four AES auxiliary bits which can be used for 24bit audio. 
In HD-SDI (and better) Audio Data Packets are 24bit as standard. Of course, the four least significant bits will be zero padded if presented with a 20bit PCM source.
- Matt Avent 2013 -
------  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.238.1.135 (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  24 bit 

message: I just reworked the article lead in and edited the "Hardware connections" section, adding pictures, attempting to unify some of the article prose and include some more citations. I welcome your suggestions/criticism.Ke6jjj (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major editing, pictures added 

message: has boldly changed this to call out balanced XLR and unbalanced coax. POF and RCA were removed. I assume the justification for this is because POF and RCA are S/PDIF, not AES3. Dp Kundu's edit comment just says, "Correcting incorrect information abt AES3 connection types." ~Kvng (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical interconnection types 

message: It doesn't seem like a separate article is necessary for this AES3-related information document. ~Kvng (talk) 17:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: by . Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 16:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[AES-2id]] 

message: It doesn't seem like a separate article is necessary for this AES3-related information document. ~Kvng (talk) 13:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[IEC 60958]]
Talk:Treia

message: Yes, the page is based on my page, and yes, I'm the one who put that notice there. But the purpose of it is far from what was stupidly and rudely labeled "vanity". If a note of some kind is not placed on the actual page to that effect, eventually someone will come by and tag the article as a copyvio, quite rightly. This has happened on articles (by other people) on my own watchlist: they failed to do that, and sure nuff, someone, in some cases me, came by and tagged it as a copyvio. If someone can figure out how better to phrase it while referencing the origin of the article, please do it. For now, I've reverted the notice. Bill 15:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Vanity signature"
Talk:Uniformization theorem

message: Add a reference to the Gauss-Bonnet theorem, which determines the sign of the curvature when the surface is of finite type.
--Mosher 14:34, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Gauss-Bonnet

message: I think there's a lot that needs to be clarified here. "The uniformization theorem" means a few different things, depending on context. It's not at all clear that the statements, "Every surface has a geometric structure," and "Every simply connected Riemann surface is either S2, the complex plane, or the upper half plane," are equivalent, and the article kind of talks about all these facts at once. For one, the fact that the conformal automorphism group of H is exactly the same as the hyperbolic isometry group is nontrivial. The fact that the universal cover of a constant curvature manifold is the same, with isometric covering translations, is worth mentioning. I think the relationship between complex structures, conformal classes, and constant curvature metrics should really be explained well for this article.67.169.47.149 (talk) 08:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs clarification

message: in this article there are two different classifications:
under Uniformization theorem#Complex classification it is : 
the Riemann sphere,
the complex plane,
the unit disk in the complex plane.
and under Uniformization theorem#Geometric classification of surfaces it is 
the sphere (curvature +1),
the Euclidean plane (curvature 0),
the hyperbolic plane (curvature −1).
I am wondering how are these classifications related and secondly  why is the " unit disk in the complex plane" special , you can just map it to the (complete) complex plane vv. WillemienH (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  classifications 

message: The French page to this article seems to be this one rather than the one already linked. Could any please change it? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadya Inoubli (talk • contribs) 22:56, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: French page
Talk:Mona Darkfeather

message: Mestizos are, by definition, half Native American. She may have lied about being a Blackfoot, but she still had native blood. Edits to come, after I get off work :p Simoes 14:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Negative impedance converter

message: you can easily explain this by drawing 2 voltage sources, each at Vs, but otherwise unconnected.  from here the amplifier makes one of the Av*Vs and the other is just Vs.  Av*Vs - Vs is applied across the resistor.  this is the explaination for what it does, and you can easily show that the two sources could be merged into a single source. Using a single source makes the circuit "simpler" but adds more confusion as it seems there is an additional feedback path.  only when the reader realizes that there is no feedback because there is no series resistance on the ideal voltage source does this become clear.
This also allows the application section to make sense.  with an added series impedance, another feedback path is formed if there is only one source.  this prevents the negative resistance from canceling out the series resistance, and can cause the circuit to latch in cases where an increase in output voltage would lead to a larger differential voltage.
likewise, the analysis's statment of the summing point constraint is not terribly valid.  there are plenty of opamp circuits that fail this, furthermore, this circuit is very close to being one of such circuits.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.229.181.173 (talk) 04:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpful, Application Errors 

message: Is the lengthy input impedance derivation in the "Basic circuit and analysis" section really necessary? I'm inclined to just state the final result and link to the input impedance article or something. -Roger (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Negative impedance is a novel result, but it's true that it seems like something trivial that follows from the circuit. Nevertheless, I think most references at least have a brief commentary on circuit operation. I think it would be fine to reduce the section to a paragraph, but I don't think it should be removed entirely. An alternative is to take the approach used on, say, Bernoulli principle where derivations are hidden by a collapsed table that can be expanded with a click. —TedPavlic (talk) 14:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengthy derivation 

message: Circuit dreamer's discussion has been moved to user space. Hellbus (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved content
Talk:Baqa'a refugee camp

message: Does the name of Baqa'a have any etymological connection to the Beqaa region of Lebanon?--Pharos 14:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Setting aside the totally immaterial nature of the "Baka" comment, is it even correct?  Surely Arabic "q" is a different stop sound from Japanese "k", and the "'" is a glotal, too?  What would actually be useful would be a note on the transliteration and pronuciation...  Alai 13:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No it wasn't correct. baqa'a is a trisyllable, with the glottal consonant ayin in the middle. --tyomitch 10:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baqa'a/Baka? 
Category talk:Volcanoes of Jordan

message: Here's a question: Are there actually any volcanoes in Jordan?--Pharos 14:48, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but none with articles.  Jordan is along the Great Rift Valley, and there are lava beds, which also exist in Saudi Arabia and Syria. - Gilgamesh 07:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Openness

message: 217.161.104.2 14:55, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Art

message: I would like to see some references. I would be very curious to find whether anyone has used this term in reliable sources in the way the article suggests. Of course people talk about the concept; I just think other terms are used and that this article should redirect to something more commonly used.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this be deleted?

message: is one of the Big Five personality traits.216.96.113.99 (talk) 09:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Openness to Experience
Talk:Daily Source Code

message: The history for this article is quite strange. There basically are several users each participating in copying a few sentences from this page, until all of it was copied. Then other users add remarks about how excellent this podcast is. In other words, a broken article. I rewrote it, keeping the relevant information but in a more encyclopedic tone. Haakon 14:58, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten to remove copyright violations and POV remarks 

message: Changed tense from present to past to show that DSC is no longer an active podcast, and to reflect the situation concerning his divorce.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.93.105.140 (talk) 11:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daily Source Code no longer broadcasting
Talk:Michael Rostovtzeff

message: There's a lot more could be said about Rostovtzeff, even in encyclopaedia article. It's coming, just gimme some time. As for the definition of stub, I'm not sure. --Barbatus 03:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub or not stub?

message: The page mostly dismisses the work of Rostovtzeff. ("… importation of those terms into a description of the ancient world, where they did not necessarily apply, caused criticism" and "Rostovtzeff's theories in this area continue to be rejected by scholars as untenable".) This on the basis of the opinion of one single author, Bowersock. I am absolutely not a specialist of the economy of Ancient Greece or of Rome. Bowersock may be right, but then it should be possible to cite more authors. Otherwise, it may reflect mostly the personal opinion of the one who wrote the critique on this page. Also, this is supposed to be consensus "today". But a 1974 "today" seems a bit far away. Many readers of this page were not yet born. For short, this looks little encyclopedic, little wikipediaic. --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of basis for the critique
Talk:Power tool

message: Isn't it weird to have this article be under the hand tools section?
Enhanced the basic page 29 May 07.  I think it is now worthy of a grade of "starter" rather than "stub". I'd make the change but I don't know how, yet.  Dstarrmittersil 21:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we change the list from two columns to three?  RJFJR (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columns 

message: I feel there should be a seperate wiki for the Power For All Alliance on the battery pack usage, same as the FIDO Alliance wiki exsists i think one should be made for P4A https://www.powerforall-alliance.com/en/ 80.112.177.234 (talk) 14:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power For All Alliance (P4A)
Talk:The Chantays

message: In what sense are the Chantays included in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? Their one hit Pipeline is listed in The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame's 500 Songs that Shaped Rock and Roll, but so are many other songs that aren't rock music; That list is influences. The Chantays are not listed as inductees of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
This is of course relevant to the question of whether surf music has now become a subgenre of rock music. Andrewa 15:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed this sentence: "The Chantays have also been included in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum in Cleveland, Ohio." as being misleading. The group are definitely not inductees which this sentence implies. The song - Pipeline - is their only connection which is noted in the sentence which followed the one I removed. If anyone feels this to be in error, please feel free to revert the edit supplying the reason for doing so.THX1136 (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: RNRHOF

message: The link to Bob Welsh of Fleetwood Mac is incorrect.  No disrespect intended for either of them.  If you compare the album covers of Pipeline and any picture of Bob Welsh of Fleetwood you will see they don't bear any resemblence to one another.
:Solved. Maikel (talk) 10:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The other Bob Welsh

message: Where did they take their name from? Maikel (talk) 10:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Khalaj language

message: On ethnologue.com, there are two distinguished Khalaj languages: Indo-Iranian Khalaj  and Turkic Khalaj (klj), though both seem to be used in Iran. Shouldn't this article be renamed something like Turkic Khalaj language? --Jūzeris | Talk 15:42, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Different versions of the language

message: Khalajestan  is land of Khalaj people in Iran , a region that Khalaj language is still spoken. Khlajestan is most southern part of ethnic Azerbaijan in Iran and is divided between two Markazi  and Qom  provinces.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Mehranbahari
:Khalaj language is not a dialect of Azerbaijani language . Indeed, it is not in the southwestern group of turkic languages. Also, there is no credible source for the word Khalajestan (it is just made up by a few weblogs). If you search it by google, you only find 36 results which all of them are related to those weblogs.   Bidabadi 22:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khalajestan (Xelecistan) 

message: Straughn, Doerfer gives some data about the number of speakers. How did you produce a map based on that data? Indeed, your map is very misleading. Just compare the area that you have coloured with the percentage of the speakers in those 3 provinces.  Jahangard 18:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your map is misleading. The problem is not that some people don't speak Khalaj in that area. The problem is that the majority of people in that area don't speak Khalaj. Jahangard 23:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The map

message: Arghu is a language family, while Khalaj is a language. Kashgari lists about 30 words Kenchek, which is also a Turkic language part of Arghu, but haven't seen anything on Wikipedia. I want to split these articles into two, just don't know where to begin. Any comments? Beshogur (talk) 17:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article into Arghu and Khalaj?