lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Josip Broz Tito

message: On the Evaluation section of the article, it includes a statement by Dominic McGoldrick. I did some research into who he is, he is a law professor. https://law.yale.edu/dominic-mcgoldrick. Is he really qualified to make this statement? He is not a historian or political scientist. Logimite (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A publication by a legal expert is an appropriate source for information about legal matters (human rights). Doremo (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation section, why is a Law professor quoted as a source? 

message: Maclean, Fitzroy (1980). Tito: A Pictorial Biography. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-044671-7. is pure hagiography. it likely does list the bare bones facts and has lots of photos, but even though its from a western mainstream publisher, its entirely pro tito, so not a balanced account. i question whether it should be in further reading, and i would question its use as a source for this article. i havent checked to see if it was used. (user: mercurywoodrose) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading
Talk:La Reine Margot (novel)

message: Please sign your posts by typing four tildes  ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Also, please add new comments at the bottom of the section. Thank you! Moonraker12 (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk
Talk:Low-density lipoprotein

message: "A diet rich in plant foods and low in animal-derived foods such as meats, eggs, and dairy products has long been promoted to lower LDL levels in all patients, since plants contain no cholesterol."
This is a very false statement. Eating a certain mix of plants might, but eating nothing but potatoes would certainly elevate LDL. shanman75  —Preceding undated comment added 00:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to cite any sources, i.e. the one you got the quote from? "Eating nothing but potatoes" is not a diet "rich in plant foods" (such wording would imply richness in diversity, not just total amount). Lumberjane Lilly (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unlikely that shanman75 will respond because he left that comment in 2014 but on the topic of foods and LDL a decent systematic review of randomized controlled trials was published in 2021. There is good evidence that tomatoes, almonds, unsaturated oils and soluble fiber (oats) decrease LDL . Unfortunately there is not much out there in the medical literature about potatoes currently. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This whole LDL thing is such a brutaly fascinating subject. First time in my life I got diagnosed with it being higher just when I did go to low-fat low-carb diet to get lighter in order to lower my pre-hypertension, nausea issue. I am doing tons of research of primary sources and having wikipedia with tons of stuff re-searched already is so helpful to get bigger picture. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(24)00009-1/fulltext 1 gives more explanation to the state. It seems in such different energy metabolism there is very little knowledge about behaviour of things like LDL and atheresclerosis. Might be interesting to gather more from different studies and possibly enrich wikipedia. This field is still so much mysterious as not many things in our lives. EDIT: I did read this article and I find it missing quite a lot of findings I saw in studies on the LDL subject. How can I approach it? Is there someone who can give me some guidance? no need to hurry. I will keep with researching the papers for following weeks.  Krypto Švejk (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor issues
Talk:The Plow That Broke the Plains

message: Is it Lorentz?  imdb has it Lorenz everywhere. -- Zoe
Yeah, it is with a t http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0520671/ -- ChristopherM 15:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With all due respect, I do hope someone can do a less shallow article on this "groundbreaking "film, explaining its significance, its cinematography (rather than just listing this as an aside), and its seminal position in relation to government films (and documentary in general), rather than concentrating on receipts and the musical score, as important as that was, or on unsourced criticisms of the POV. Sadly, I simply don't have the time, but there are many many sources in film histories. Please? 
Actio (talk) 01:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be working on this article over the next couple of months as a part of my project for a class in school! I will be sure to include its significance, cinematography, and relationship to government films! --LSWCUPA (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Over today and tomorrow I will be making my edits to this wikipedia article. Hopefully my contributions will add more substance to this subject. LSWCUPA (talk) 02:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  seriously--Can someone actually write an article on this important landmark film?
Talk:Gandhi

message: User:Pizzadeliveryboy has changed this from redirecting to Mohandas Gandhi to redirecting to Gandhi (disambiguation).  I think that any reference to Gandhi without specificity nearly always refers to Mohandas Gandhi, so this should redirect there as per WP:D#Confusion User:Gurubrahma has now changed this back.
--Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 19:01, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is no longer true, as post-Independence political articles increase. References to "Gandhi" commonly include the two Prime ministers by that name. I personally change many such links. I no longer think this is a permissible redirect; I shall await input. If I hear nothing, I will make the change in a few days. Hornplease 10:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where should this redirect?
Talk:Euclid

message: You should use B.C.E. and C.E. instead of BC and AD as these are old, and should not be used in this article to make it modern.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saralizt13 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  old bc/ad used instead of bce and ce. 

message: From a layman's perspective, the current portrait of Euclid isn't revealing or provides what may be seen as an accurate depiction of the artist. Though the romantic/dramatic element isn't bad, it seems de Ribera made the portrait intentionally dark— which, on a webpage, makes it difficult to see. I propose switching the portrait to something like  instead. GuardianH (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I'm not sure really what you mean by "accurate depiction", which would be essentially impossible in this case. I would prefer the current portrait, by a well established artist, rather than a rather random statue. In addition, since I don't trust readers to read the image captions, I suspect that have a marble statue (which evokes the ancient Greek sculpture) might make some assume they're seeing an authentic portrayal, where as a painting makes it obvious they are not. Then again, my first point is the crux of my disagreement. Aza24 (talk) 03:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is really close to my reasoning, and that's why I changed the image in the infobox. No portrait is a real portrait of Euclid, but this one at least is from a well-known artist. Artem.G (talk) 07:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the portrait 

message: This page https://myria.math.aegean.gr/elements is new and gives a free version of The Elements in both Modern Greek and Ancient Greek. Could this be added in the subsection "The Elements" of the section "external Links" ? Antonis.tsolomitis (talk) 13:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Antonis.tsolomitis, I would say it would be a better addition to the external links section of the Euclid's Elements article. This article is about Euclid in general, so it would be best to avoid too many links for specific topics related to him, and we already have two Elements links. Aza24 (talk) 23:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Now fixed, many thanks. Aza24 (talk) 03:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a source for the Elements 

message: In the description of the Elements, in the subsection Contents, this phrase makes no sense "a series of 20 definitions for basic concepts geometric concepts".  I would make an edit but I am not sure what is intended JRGp (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What was intended: "basic geometric concepts".  Good spotting, fixed.  -- Elphion (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrambled sentence 

message: Euclid wrote in Greek, so he did not include the actual Latin words "quod erat demonstrandum" in his works. AnonMoos (talk) 06:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 10 a little misleading
Talk:David Angell

message: I think "he was survived by his brother" seems excessively obfuscated.  I think it should be changed, but since nobody has done it yet, I thought I'd ask.Shadow demon 05:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know many pages that use murdered, so i'm going to change it, but if i'm wrong, please tell me!! Im so sorry if i am -=) Bitbitz.xx 03:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Murdered

message: Lynn Edwards (1971-2001)
Did his wife die with him? Morhange (talk) 16:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She was on the same plane, yes. All Hallow's (talk) 22:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spouse

message: Did Mr. Angell have a sibling that was adopted?  "His natural brother, the Most Rev. Kenneth Angell, is a Roman Catholic prelate and former bishop of Burlington, Vermont."69.150.75.33 (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  adopted?
Talk:Leonard Bernstein

message: How did Bernstein avoid military service in WW II?  Just wondering...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.162.136.248 (talk) 23:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: He had asthma (making him medically unfit to serve), which was nicely added to this article recently by User:Minnehaha850. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 17:56, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hilarious. Smoked 5 packs a day and blames asthma 64.188.147.36 (talk) 02:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: whats more hillarious, is some rich people paying poor peasant to go to war in America? Have you heard of it? Its tragic Benfor445 (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW II 

message: I just have to wonder: Would somebody that "held an event seeking to raise awareness and money for the defense of several members of the KKK" also be introduced as a humanitarian? A lot of articles on leftist figures read like some sort of hagiography. --105.0.5.191 (talk) 23:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s difficult to make sense out of this. The underlying presumptions seem to be that the world cleaves into two parts, “left” and “right”, that one of these is the mirror image of the other, and that it is just as virtuous to be “right” as it is to be “left”. None of these presumptions has anything to do with reality. If you have a complaint about the article, you need to specify clearly, in a straightforward manner, what that complaint actuallly is. TheScotch (talk) 07:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Humanitarian" 

message: Felicia Montealegre was born in 1922 not  1952. 2601:84:8100:24E0:101B:F395:C071:5920 (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: She was indeed. Where in the article does it state that she was born in 1952? Favonian (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leonard Bernstein’s wife date of birth
Talk:Louvre

message: I want to know main information 175.157.32.54 (talk) 10:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Which one? --Tangopaso (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jrxijown (talk) 03:34, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: Hi ihave a old paint 1918 if y0u buy tell me please,i,m iranian my name ismail .
Thanks 5.123.194.248 (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  For sell
Talk:Agnostida

message: What is the size range of these beasties? Also how many thoracic segements, typically? Stub Mandrel (talk) 06:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 
Talk:Kilo Ali

message: Non-information page? User:Vassili Nikolaev
* Looks like someone's personal page. Voting for deletion. -- April
* According to the link below, this artist's real name is Andrell Demetrius Rogers.  Accordting to an inmate query at www.dcor.state.ga.us, he is currently incarcerated in Georgia, at the Effingham County Correctional Institution.
On 08/17/1998, police found Rogers was sitting next to his burning house.  He was apparently convicted of arson in connection with the event.
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AT&p_theme=at&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EADA3DD401CC048&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
24.197.129.57 (talk) 20:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Linus Pauling

message: Pauling was undoubtedly a very important scientist, however he did make some pretty bad mistakes too that due to his fame hindered science. Three such events come to mind, there might be others:
* The wrong structure proposed for the DNA (triple helix with phosphates pointing inwards)
* The unwillingness to accept existence of quasi-crystals
* The wrong structure proposed for phosphomolybdic acid, what is now called the Keggin structure. This is important as it was the first polyoxometalate to be identified as well as the first one to have its structure solved.
In light of this, shouldn't there be a criticism section in this article?
185.46.77.38 (talk) 15:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Linus Van Pelt was named for Linus Pauling. Drsruli (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commemorations section
Talk:List of companies of Germany

message: This is a very vague topic -- Is this going to include every German company?  Is it German Companies operating in the US (in which case, may I remind everyone that this is not a US wikipedia)?  Is it German Companies that make more than a certain amount of income a year? Perhaps it would be a good thing to make sure the goal is clear before creating an article? Or at least to let the rest of us know what the goal is? ;-) JHK
:I think this should include all the multinational companies, if that is really a large list, it should be orking atleast outside the Europe etc.The other option is to make a certain amount of yearly turnover as criteria.--Anupam Srivastava 14:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The question of List vs. Category has been discussed in various AFDs for these lists of companies by country, with all discussions ending in Keep/No Consensus.  Seeing as these lists seem to be going nowhere I'm looking to establish, within WikiProject Companies, a set of guidelines that would address the concerns raised above.  A draft has been put together here, and I appreciate constructive feedback from all interested Wikipedians! - Richc80 (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Guidelines for Lists of companies by country - Feedback welcome

message: Bas Trucks is a Dutch dealer of used camions/lorries/trucks (how is it named in Australia? No, a road-train is a 'giga-liner' in continental Denglish... ;-)) in the Netherlands. I fear, our friends in the neighbourhood will be not amused, if they will be incorporated in Germany by Wikipedia. Check http://de.bastrucks.com/content.php?id=2009. Greetings from Germany --85.181.167.210 (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bas Trucks
Talk:List of companies of Sweden

message: Please see talk at talk:German companies JHK
----
Please contribute at List of software companies. I've added a section for Sweden there and added MySQL AB, one Swedish software company that I know of. Jay 18:10, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: To this article look the same way as the other company per country articles, I'll remove the minor and major categories. In addition I think it has the benefit of removing the unavoidable ambiguity of where the limit between major and minor goes. --Denoir 21:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor, Major

message: How is IKEA a dutch company when the swedish founder Ingvar Kamprad still owns it all via various foundations?!??
As a result of his ownership, Forbes have many times ranked Ingvar Kamprad as the worlds richest man, even  over Bill Gates.
ANSWER:
Because IKEA is owned by a Dutch Charity (which is controlled by Ingvar Kamprad). For Tax reasons obviously.
::to the post above: sign your posts!
headquarters are also in the Netherlands, and almost all the international shipping management is in the Netherlands. Markthemac (talk) 20:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  IKEA dutch?
Talk:Māori people

message: Might I suggest, in light of the fact that the article was already over the maximum recommended article size, that the recent additions are bordering on image bloat. If it continues would anyone find a  tag inappropriate? DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 09:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If this continues, I feel a level 1 disruptive editing warning might not be out of place either. —VeryRarelyStable 11:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image bloat
Talk:Democratic Republic of the Congo

message: Wildly inaccurate and misleading geography. Look at a map. The DRC stretches over 1100 miles North to South on its Western side. There is no reason I can think of to base the geographic description of the country on the small "arm" or "tail" which reaches to the Atlantic. (if there is a geographic term for this 'protrusion', I am not aware of it.) The DRC has about 26 miles of Atlantic coast and the vast, vast majority of the country is hundreds of miles from the Atlantic, as is most of the 1100 miles of its western border. (The arm is at least 270 miles long). The article claims the DRC is on the Atlantic coast; it is not. The article claims that the DRC is a coastal country. It is not. I wonder if the completely inaccurate geography in the lead is an indication that the rest of the article is equally bad?174.130.71.156 (talk) 06:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 26 miles is still on the coast though... so, it's not technically wrong. Maybe you could add context that would help people get the right idea about the coastal classification. Be the change you wish to see. Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubbish 

message: The terms East Congo and West Congo could help alleviate the confusion between the naming of the two Congos. I consistently have to do double-takes when taking about these two countries and since other countries like North Korea and South Korea have cardinal classifications instead of referring to them as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea, wouldn't it make sense to do the same with the Congos? East Congo has a nice ring to it, no? Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 01:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome to launch a campaign--outside of Wikipedia--to get the two Congos commonly referred to by those names.  If you succeed, and the uses become widespread, Wikipedia will likely follow suit.  But not before.  (Anyway, I personally am glad that the Democratic Republic changed its name back to Congo; now that it's no longer called Zaire, I can say I've visited every country in the world that begins with Z.) Uporządnicki (talk) 12:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Congo
Talk:Jean Chrétien

message: The current one looks good, but surely it'd be much better to have one from during his premiership, rather than one from 2010. The images from during his premiership are of lower quality, but other articles, like the ones on John Howard and Justin Trudeau, have had their images changed from high quality ones to lower quality, but more appropriate ones. Geminin667 (talk) 11:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that general approach.  For instance, a long time ago I substituted a photo of Mulroney from when he was PM, replacing a picture of him taken just a few years ago.  I think it's a good idea to have a photo contemporary with time in office, if one is available.  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 17:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I feel the article should use an image from when he was Prime Minister 

message: Chrétien was born in Shawinigan Falls, which was later renamed Shawinigan. For the sake of historical accuracy, the article should say that he was born in Shawinigan Falls. If someone wants to add that the town was later renamed, that's fine by me. This is, as Ak-eater06 has pointed out, an important article, so it's crucial that we get the basic facts right. Instant Comma (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Haven't looked at the article, but we should go with what the place was called at the time of Chretien's birth. I've always sided with birthplace name for towns, cities, countries of individuals, in these instances. GoodDay (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

text: Not really my area, but isn't it normal to state such things as born in x (now y)? G. Timothy Walton (talk) 22:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shawinigan Falls 