Talk:Spanish irregular verbs

message: I recently sent a message to the Real Academia Española which proposed the removal of all irregular stems in the preterite of all verbs ending in -ducir and their replacement with regular stems (for example: condujeron replaced with conducieron). 24.191.232.15 (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion of verbs ending in -ducir to regular verbs in the preterite

message: I have noticed that verbs with an inserted g before the o in the 1st person also have the spurious d repacing the last vowel in the future stem.
infinitive	1st p s	future stem
tener     	tengo  	tendr
venir     	vengo  	vendr
salir     	salgo  	saldr
poner     	pongo  	pondr
etc. 
Is this a unbreakable rule, or just a coincidence in the examples I have seen.
Note that g verbs that dont follow the rules exactly dont work, 
infinitive	1st p s	strict g rule	future stem
hacer     	hago   	hacgo        	hic
traer     	traigo 	traego       	traer
oir       	oigo   	ogo          	oir
Vosotros:
Hi everyone, sorry but in spanish the second persson is Vosotros (vos) and in spanish is podeis (podes is in sudamerican). Please change this words because in Spanin and other spanish countrys do nor use (podés, molés , tenés..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carran (talk • contribs) 10:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  g verbs in the future tense 

message: I prefer "G-verbs" to "go-verbs" or "yo-go verbs" because the G appears not only in the "yo" form of the present indicative but also in the present subjunctive. (In spite of a long career teaching Spanish and seeing dozens of textbooks, I've never encountered a name for this group of verbs before, but I admit it could be useful to name them.)  James Harris (Spanish Phonology, MIT Press, 1969) calls the G a "velar augment" and lumps it together with the C of "conozco", "parezca", etc. Kotabatubara (talk) 15:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: G-verbs

message: Hello - I built a website to conjugate Spanish verbs, largely based on the information in this Wikipedia page. I'd like to include the following link to it in the External Links section:
*[decimos.net] A Spanish verb conjugator, largely based on this Wikipedia article, that explains each conjugated form, including any irregularities, step by step.
I think it makes a useful contribution, illustrating the application of the irregularities described to most verbs, including where multiple irregularities coincide.
Per Wikipedia:External links, this is a potential conflict of interest, so I'd like to seek opinions on adding it. If there's no response I'll probably add it in June 2019. Please ask if you have any questions, etc.
Thanks Brute100 (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New External Link? 

message: This could be mentioned in the Others section. Like ser it is not just the first person singular that is different, it actually has four different stems in he, has/ha/han, hemos, habéis. (habeo was regular in Latin, *h₁ésmi was regular in PIE). This is of course the auxiliary verb.
Fun fact: As far as I can tell, it's the only case where 1st and 2nd person plural have different stems; in all tenses of all other verbs and in all other tenses of haber, you can remove -mos and add -is/-isteis to get the 2nd person plural from the 1st person plural (merging double i when relevant and possibly adding/removing a tilde to keep the same stressed syllable). Lhmathies (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah it sounds like it could be put there, it's pretty irregular. Erinius (talk) 21:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

text: As a side fact, I found an article giving citations for a 1st person plural habemos used in the existential sense (more or less "we are available") and noting that the form hemos spread with the use of haber as the auxiliary replacing ser. Not in scope for the main article, but it helped me understand how things came to be as they are.Lhmathies (talk) 12:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irregular present stem(s) of haber 

message: In the Asturian language, the vosotros conjugation for the verb andar in the preterite is andaron, but this is not the case for the ustedes conjugation in Spanish (which is anduvieron).  The improper use of regular conjugations in the preterite (for example, the use of andaste and andaron instead of the actual terms anduviste and anduvieron) for the verb is sometimes used in regular speech, however, and the prevalence of this has been increasing in recent years, particularly among non-native speakers. Therefore, it can be inferred that andar is one of only a few verbs that is decaying at a faster rate than other verbs that are irregular in the preterite. 
Historically, the English language had many irregular verbs, but most of them have decayed within an average period of 1,400 years (with the remaining irregular verbs having a decay period that can go up to 38,800 years, which is way past the lifespan of the language). This is because the English language lacks an authoritative governing body, unlike Spanish, where the Real Academia Española governs rules related to Spanish grammar.
24.191.232.15 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important information regarding the verb ''andar''