lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:MLBBioHon

message: I'm not sure this box tells the reader anything important.  It certainly doesn't need to be at the top of the page, which is where the creator has been putting it.  Move to strike? HokieRNB 19:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good template for noting a player who has been honored after the fashion of retired squad numbers but who did not actually have a squad number, either because he played before they came into use or because he was not a player.  For players who did have actual numbers retired, the  should be used instead.  I just made this change for a number of players.  --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 16:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this necessary
Talk:White Hart Lane railway station

message: This article claims that the stadium White Hart Lane is called that because of the station, however this is untrue, as Tottenham say so in their Junior newsletter. It is known as White Hart Lane due to the White Hart pub that once stood next to the ground. Turn to page 13 in this: http://tottenhamhotspur.digitaleditions.co.uk/spring2011/
That was made by THFC themselves and sent to all their junior members via email  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.76.109 (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Hart lane name 

message: It is 7 miles 11 chains (11.5 km) from London Liverpool Street and is situated between Bruce Grove and Silver Street. It is in Travelcard zone 3.
Really? Chains? Why are we using such an archaic units? David G (talk) 00:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that's what  use. See Talk:East Croydon station#Chains; Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 42#Chains, again; Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 42#Clean up of Chain (unit); Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 43 (throughout); Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 44#Units and conversion; Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 44#Chains- the position on 8th August 2018; Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Archive 158#Distances measured in chains; and Talk:Chain (unit)#Attempt to clean up the lede and the article (to the end of the page). Let's not go through all that again. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:18, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chains??
Talk:Minories railway station

message: The text and the infobox give contradicting years for the station's closure.--SilasW (talk) 19:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of closure 

message: If the site is now occupied by the Minories pub, then the Tower Gateway article needs to be amended as it currently states the site is now occupied by Tower Gateway. Thanks. --TBM10 (talk) 07:33, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site location
Talk:Backstage.bbc.co.uk

message: A note about the COI tag: Wikipedia Scanner lists  and  as IP addresses associated with the BBC. Both of these addresses have edited the page, the first one created it and added much of the content. 82.39.33.148 (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added most of the content to this page and I don't work for the BBC.  BRIANTIST  (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[BBC]] Spam
Talk:Flame cutting (firearms)

message: This is widely discussed in firearms magazines, websites and at firing ranges. It is an observable phenomonon, but there appears to be little concrete research outside anecdotal second-hand quotes from the R&D departments of the revolver makers.
The term "flame cutting" or "flame-cutting" is used fairly consistently (goggle or altavista search "flame cutting" AND "revolver"). If I have time for further research to find verifiable, citable reliable sources I will edit this article; or if someone wants to do it themsleves, here are some of the things I have found on the subject over the years:
Some revolvers, such as the S&W 329PD, have a "blast shield" or "flame shield"  insert in the top of the frame which takes the effect of flame cutting before the frame itself is damaged. Most such revolvers have alloy frames.
Older S&W and Colt steel frame revolvers had a relief cut in the top strap (referred to by collectors as the "thumbnail"). The revolver makers found that flame cutting tended to be self-limiting (once the flame cut reached a similar depth as the relief cut or "thumbnail" there was enough gas relief that flame cutting abated). Most current steel frame revolvers lack the "thumbnail" or relief cut in the top strap above the cylinder-barrel gap. 
The damage from flame cutting in a revolver depends on several factors: excessive gap between the cylinder and barrel, the burning temperature of the gunpowder used, the pressure generated by the cartridge or load used, and the amount of debris (powder residue and bullet material) in the gases escaping the cylinder gap. Generally speaking, a revolver with minimum gap between the cylinder and barrel firing low pressure rounds with powder that burns cleanly at lower temperature will show less flame cutting than a revolver with a wider gap firing high pressure rounds with powder that is hot and dirty.
 
Bullets light for the caliber allow the bullet to cross the cylinder gap when the combustion gases are at their hottest and may contribute to flame cutting. 
Excessive fouling at the forcing cone of the barrel may slow down the bullet, forcing more gas to escape at the cylinder-barrel gap and contributing to flame cutting.
Damage to the forcing cone, such as a dent or cut, may allow excessive gas to escape at the cylinder-barrel gap. 
Flame cutting is also observed on the cylinder pin of Colt-style black powder revolvers without the top strap (eg, Models of 1851 and 1860). Naaman Brown (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flame cutting or flame-cutting 

message: What infobox should we populate this article with? Kartano (talk) 17:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What infobox?
Talk:Global Industry Classification Standard

message: What are the numbers for next to the sectors in the table (ie. 10, 15, 20, etc.)?
User5910 20:12, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this article be classified as a list article? -- Spaced about (talk) 11:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List class?
Talk:The Spirit of St. Louis (disambiguation)

message: Items removed from the dab page because there are no incoming links and no associated Wikipedia articles to link to:
* The Spirit of St. Louis (science center)
* The Spirit of St. Louis (train), operated by the Pennsylvania Railroad from St. Louis to New York
--ShelfSkewed Talk 20:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks
Talk:Kralyevich Productions

message: This page is about a major production company that does work for many cable televisions stations.
It has even won two Primetime Emmys for its show "Rome:Engineering an Empire"
As the article stands it is very bare bones, but  soon, I will add much more content that illustrates the importance of this company.
:Are there sources to verify the Emmys?  If articles have been written about this company in significant sources, then it'll certainly have a claim to notability, but remember that if you are an employee of the company, our conflict of interest guidelines ask that you not create an article about it.  If the company is truly important, people who are not employees will also think it's important enough to write about. -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mitcham Eastfields railway station

message: I have reverted  unless someone can provide info that it is currently under construction and of the opening date will be December. I cannot see that in current sources and had trouble finding any. Please provide. Simply south 13:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is certainly currently under construction at the moment, I use the line regularly.  However not a word of this new station has been breathed just a couple of stops down the line, no news or information, despite it having a clear impact on our journeys- I have no problem with the train taking 2 minutes longer to get to wherever I'm going, but a poster with some information would have been nice!  So I'm afraid I can't offer any firm information of opening dates, but it's definitely under construction. Belle pullman (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well now the opening date is set for tthe middle of this month. Simply south (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Posters are now up at Southern stations. Wheeltapper (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small reversion 
Talk:Lea Bridge railway station

message: This doesn't count as a reliable source, does it? Simply south  ...... sitting on fans for just 8 years 11:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: This section needs reworking slightly - 'a new service to and from Stratford' (involving where else?) - and some of the verbs need to be put in the past tense.
Probably best done after the event (when times etc can be included). Jackiespeel (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopening
Talk:Battersea railway station

message: It was on WLL (though whose part I don't know offhand) but closed before British Rail was created so I cut the BR reference.--SilasW (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Is anyone else slightly ill at ease with the tagging of closed stations on open lines as being on Disused Railways? --SilasW (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disused railways 

message: This article and its map have the station as Battersea but the linked West London Line article has Battersea High Street. Course 1962, a reference for Battersea railway station in List of closed railway stations in London, lists Battersea but seems to have no other mention of it under any name. Google yields 9 hits for Battersea High Street station (some clearly copies of WP articles) and none for Battersea High Street railway station. How official was the inclusion of High Street?--SilasW (talk) 12:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of station
Talk:Ibón Arrieta

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:COMMONNAME   Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 16:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ibón Pérez Arrieta →  – WP:COMMONNAME is just "Ibón Arrieta", doesn't use paternal surname professionally. Sources already on page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Ortizesp (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 September 2020
Talk:Bow railway station

message: It is incorrect to state that the NLR east of Dalston was closed after war damage. It could have been the docks branch from Victoria Park to Poplar that closed then, but I have been unable to verify the closure date of that line.Stuartsh (talk) 18:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Passenger services on the NLR east of Dalston were suspended due to war damage on 15 May 1944 and replaced by buses; the line was officially closed to passengers and the ticket offices closed on 23 April 1945. Very occasional freight traffic continued south of Victoria Park Junction until 1982 when conversion work began for the DLR. The line from Victoria Park Junction to Stratford (i.e., the section still in use as the eastern end of today's North London Line) was owned by the Eastern Counties Railway (later the GER) and never part of the NLR. – iridescent 19:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NLR History wrong

message: There is no apparent linkage between the text about the concert hall and the railway station history. Can someone explain?Stuartsh (talk) 18:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "The original station … incorporated a concert hall" – "[the line closed and] the concert hall went through a variety of uses". Seems reasonably clear to me; I'll clean the article up a bit at some point. – iridescent 19:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Concert Hall
Talk:Gallions railway station

message: The subject of the article and first paragraph appears not to be that of the second paragraph. Correction or explanation seems needed. WP article "Central railway station (London)" has the same quirk.--SilasW (talk) 20:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact other the articles about other stations on the line have the same fault, apparently they are cut and paste versions with the subject not properly changed. Para 2 now says "The station..." instead of a wrong name.--SilasW (talk) 07:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of subject
Talk:Millwall Docks railway station

message: The article (uncited until my addition today) states goods services continued until the 1970s, however this website says freight stopped in 1925 and the station was demolished 1930-31. Are there any other sources which could clarify the fate of this station? --TBM10 (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure and demolition
Talk:Manor Way railway station

message: According to http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/stations/m/manor%20way/index1.shtml 1) the station was opened in 18812) by London & St. Katharine Docks Company and3) was resited in 1886.--SilasW (talk) 15:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details needing confirming
Talk:Sulla's civil war

message: Misguidedly, I just linked to this page under the heading of the this section on the Sulla biography, without reading the second civil war page through first (as soon as I found out it existed, and having seen the similar link for his first civil war, I thought it made sense and did the edit before actually reading it)
I then found out that i had just linked to a terse summary of the war from a more detailed explanation of it. Should not the dedicated article bear more info than the section in the biography?
In yet another of my many floutings of WP:BOLD, I have put this issue to the community both here and on the Sulla talk page. 
Since that is the bigger page with more traffic (perhaps the root of the problem), I suggest we discuss it there.
☭ мдснєтє тдлкЅТЦФФ 09:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong way round? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Sulla's second civil war. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 6#Sulla's second civil war until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 02:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sulla's second civil war" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Victoria Park railway station (England)

message: The NE corner of Victoria Park surely places the station in LBH, or (at a stretch) LBN. I would think not LBTH. cheers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbthompson (talk • contribs) 10:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location, location ... 

message: Article says 1850-1944, Course 1962 has 1856 to 1943 (page 244) or 1944 (page 234)
http://www.abandonedstations.org.uk/North_London_Railway_2.html says
[Line]
Opened 26.9.1850 Victoria Park - Bow Jn; 1.1.1852 Bow - Poplar.
Closed to passengers 23.4.1945 Victoria Park - Poplar Docks; 7.11.1949 Bow Jn - Gas Works Jn. 
Closed to goods 3.10.1983 Victoria Park Jn - Poplar Docks
Stations
- Victoria Park (opened 1856)
--SilasW (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates needed confirming
Talk:Waddon Marsh railway station

message: The co-ordinates at the top of the page fall on the track but do not tally well with the article's saying that the tram stop is about 100 m/y away, the picture of the station's site suggests it was further SE (ie not so near the bridge).--SilasW (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Limehouse railway station (1840–1926)

message: The article said it was on Three Colts Street. Perhaps that was the Victorian name but now Google finds 43 "Three Colts Street"s to 7,700 "Three Colt Street"s.--SilasW (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of its road 

message: Hate to sound pedantic, but the other (current) Limehouse station was also a London and Blackwall Railway station, so should the disambiguation in this article's name be changed to read: Limehouse railway station (1840-1926) ? Just a thought. --TBM10 (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In view of certain recent moves of UK railway stations in general, and the fact that this page has been moved three times so far ( → (21:45, 22 August 2009)  → (08:16, 23 September 2009)  → (10:46, 22 June 2014‎) ), the last of which was less than twelve hours ago, I suggest that you either inform WT:UKRAIL or make this into a formal WP:RM. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Poplar (East India Road) railway station

message: The article is unreferenced and states the station opened in 1850, becoming a terminus in 1865. However, this website states it opened in 1866 as a terminus. Are there any other sources we can verify the facts? --TBM10 (talk) 10:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Butt (1995) says opened 1 August 1866 by the North London Rly, closed 23 April 1945 by the LMS. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Gordon's Little Book of the East End says opened 1/8/1866 and demolished 1947. I think it may also be worth mentioning it was the most heavily bombed station in London in the Blitz. --TBM10 (talk) 18:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of references
Talk:South Dock railway station

message: South Quay DLR is hardly a replacement of South Dock station, apart from the sixty year gap, it may be the nearest current station but it is across the watery South Dock. Canary Wharf LU and Heron Quays DLR are similar distances from the site of South Dock station.--SilasW (talk) 09:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement
Talk:St Quintin Park & Wormwood Scrubs railway station

message: The article has 1871. Elsewhere on the web 1844 and 1840 are given. Needs investigation.--SilasW (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since writing that I've found a copy of the 1981 reprint of "The West London Railway and the W.L.E.R." by H.V.Borley & R.W.Kidner, The Oakwood Press,  which gives 1 Aug 1871 as date of opening and 1 November 1893 for resiting "four chains" (80 m) north. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilasW (talk • contribs) 21:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date? 

message: Was it indeed in Kensal Green, as recently edited by an IP, or was it in North Kensington? --TBM10 (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. Kensal Green is on the border of the London Borough of Brent and the LB of Kensington and Chelsea; North Kensington is entirely within Kensington and Chelsea. However, the station site lies within the present-day London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. I'd say that either Wormwood Scrubs or Shepherd's Bush were better descriptions of the locality than Kensal Green. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: "Most electric trains on the present-day West London Line stop near the site of the former station to change current collection method"
How do the few that don't stop deal with the change-over? Do they simply coast for a while? If so, why do some stop at all? 87.75.117.183 (talk) 10:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current collection change-over
Talk:Crown Coach Corporation

message: Did this company have anything to do with Crown Fork-lifts? j/c  - knoodelhed 20:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fork-lifts 

message: "They were so well built that one of the factors that forced Crown to shut down was their product's extremely long life."
Somehow, I doubt that that's true. I'm going to ask for a citation to back it up.66.234.222.96 (talk) 06:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV violation? 

message: There is some truth to the longevity issue. One entity is currently running over 200 Crowns that are 30 years old. Think they might buy some more if they were available? Fabrico (talk) 15:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A long lived machine... 

message: I'm a little surprised that the history section makes no mention of what happened to the Crown brand name after Crown went out of business (see Carpenter Body Company).  There really ought to be some mention of it. –BMRR (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section 

message: At this point, there is probably enough content to begin a stand-alone article on the Crown fire trucks, as has happened with the Crown buses; in the end, this can allow for a major cleanup of the article in the future.  --SteveCof00My Suggestion box is open 07:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crown Firecoach content 
Talk:NetStumbler

message: what are the alternatives to this piece of software?
Yeah, this page advertising netstumbler while not giving any chance to find alternatives, eg. TamoSoft CommView, cisco AirMagnet etc (well, they are all commercial)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.69.208 (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternatives 

message: NetStumbler does work in Vista as long as you run it's compatibility options through WinXP 32bit. I use it in vista nearly everyday.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.218.71.233 (talk) 18:45, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 
It will however not run if you plug it right into a Vista enabled PC and expect it to run. Rexmage 06:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vista Compatibility. 

message: It seems the author or NetStumbler has started a company "Helium Networks" (heliumnetworks.com) with as its main product a newer version of NetStumbler, renamed as "SiteStumbler", which it sells for just $249,-
NetStumbler itself has not seen any updates for more then 3 years (last update was April 2004).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.165.3.128 (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at Helium Networks' website, NetStumbler's author is not on the board of directors. I'm guessing they are merely commercial licensees of NetStumbler. Note that SiteStumbler is a specialized product for performing site surveys, with a mapping capability. Letdorf 09:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helium Networks SiteStumbler 
Talk:Shepherd's Bush railway station (1869–1916)

message: Dendy Marshall's History of the Southern Railway, 2nd edition revised by R.W.Kidner, 1963 gives date of opening as "May 1874" and of closure "5 June 1916" while the article has "1 January 1874" and "3 June 1916".--SilasW (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 
Talk:Rickmansworth (Church Street) railway station

message: The sentence 'Opening on 1 September 1887...' applies to the current Rickmansworth Station: possibly the previous sentence should read '[[Rickmansworth Station], opened 1 September 1887, is about...'. (Not being part of the WP railway group). Jackiespeel (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking
Talk:Nanisivik, Nunavut

message: There had been an excessive number of external links (mostly new ones added regarding the planned naval installation), I have tried to work them into the article as refrences, I have also removed some of the older news articles relating to the town.--Kelapstick 20:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed :Category:Environmental disasters in Canada, there is nothing in the article to support that it should be categorized as such, and I don't remember anything like that the last time I was there.--kelapstick (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental disasters 

message: See www.MERX.ca, use keyword "Nanisivik".  Tender only open until May 4th, 2010, so after that the posting will be gone.  Procurement is by Defence Construction Canada.  Ballpark of project budget is $1-million.  No indication in posting of how many units.  Specifies: "modular housing".--Atikokan (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  News:  Invitation to Tender (ITT) issued April 2010 to build new housing in Nanisivik