lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Latanoprost

message: The article states the Xalatan patent expires in 2011. I see multiple similar references on the web, but after encountering an apparent real life generic Xalatan, I went looking and found a reference that says 9/2009 . Perhaps this is due to what's said in this patent 4,599,353 extension from 1998: . 
On the other hand, there are references to a newer related patent: 5,296,504. I think this one expires in 2011 (see ). And there's yet another: 5,422,368, but it looks like it might have been ruled unenforceable in 2004 .
In summary, I'm not sure about the whole thing. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.230.83.179 (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xalatan Patent Expiry 

message: Lazlo Bito et al was the ones first having the idea of using prostaglandins to treat glaucoma. The drug Latanoprost was developed by Johan Stjernschantz and Bahram Resul at Pharmacia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.238.122.15 (talk) 08:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor 

message: The "Storage" section currently implies that latanoprost's breakdown rates at 50 °C (122 °F) and 70 °C (158 °F) lead to the requirement "to store Latanoprost ideally in temperature below room temperature and free from sunlight". I've never heard such high temperatures being considered "room temperature". At first I thought someone had erred on or vandalized the units, but the LWW.com abstract includes these statements nearly verbatim. However, the abstract also states that latanoprost is stable at 25 °C (77 °F), which is a little higher than the conventional meaning of "room temperature", around 21 °C or 70 °F. This would seem to suggest that there's no need to store it in a cooler place (although the sunshine avoidance would still apply).
Does anyone have access to the original article to see if there's an explanation for why the temperature tests and conclusion seem to disagree? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 01:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused about "Storage" recommendations 

message: Not sure why User:RNbty10 restored the primary source and removed the secondary source?
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Replaced primary with secondary source
Talk:Access key

message: The CSS snippet to show accesskeys has become out-of-date (notably, ::after is preferred in CSS3 to distinguish pseudoelements from pseudoselectors).  However, the "new" way might not be supported on earlier browsers including IE8 and below.  Is it better to list an example that will work in these implementations or an up-to-date example? --Brighterandedgier (talk) 00:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update CSS example? 

message: What about the S60 browser on a Nokia E75? Are access keys supported? --91.20.4.24 (talk) 17:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  S60 access keys? 

message: The examples of BBC or Financical time do not work in my FireFox v8.0. Someone please check whether the examples are outdated or whether the ALT+shift + key is wrong in the current FF version.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.150.88.5 (talk) 07:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if they changed something in the last versions, but at the moment it is working fine at Wikipedia with the latest Firefox. mabdul 12:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC or FT examples not working? 

message: The article says "However, XHTML 2 has been retired in favor of HTML 5, which (as of August 2009) continues to permit accesskeys.", which seems to contradict this. - 193.84.186.81 (talk) 04:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See The accesskey attribute of the HTML5 specification. The document you've cited is from 2008, and seems to be incongruous with the current specification. Mindmatrix 05:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HTML5 

message: At least in firefox since 2004 the builtin stylesheet underlines HTML span Elements with the Classname "accesskey".
https://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/toolkit/content/xul.css#664
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&root=/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla/toolkit/content&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&file=xul.css&rev2=1.48&rev1=1.47#diff+xul.css+1.47+1.48  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.159.37.237 (talk) 09:48, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indication built in 

message: Prior to IE8 ... In IE9 this is still the case.
Huh? So "in all versions" is equal to that, right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.55.21.247 (talk) 13:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IE 

message: Can I use my mobile to reìset my computer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.126.170.144 (talk) 01:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  have forgotten password on my laptop 

message: :after with single colon was introduced earlier, but later was normalized to double colon ::after as a pseudo-element. Single colon is for pseudo-classes like :hover.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.185.222.149 (talk) 09:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  :after
Talk:Human Race

message: It should be noted that the phrase "human race" is an error. Race refers to just that--race. Not species, gender, or any other misuse of the word. Cparker 14:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are two headlines that differ only in capitalization, “Human Race” (a disambiguation page) and “Human race” (a redirect to “Human”). I think the disambiguation is good and should be renamed to “Human race” while the redirect should be gone. Pavlix (talk) 11:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization issue
Talk:Cape (dog)

message: I am working on expanding this article to cover several types of vests/capes/jackets worn by Working dogs. (This article will not include all attire worn by dogs, especially pets, and eventually I might request that the article get renamed to Working dog attire with redirects to it from Cape (dog) and other harness- and vest-related terms.) In the days to come, I will be adding text content and citations in each section. The images I chose should give you an idea of where I'm going with this article. If anyone wishes to contribute, go ahead and add content in the appropriate section. You're also welcome to add URLs below if you think they would be helpful to the article and you don't wish to add accompanying content at this time. Normal Op (talk) 23:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with your direction and possible move of this article to a more-comprehensive name. The article had already commenced covering harnesses, which is outside the scope of the title. William Harris (talk) 00:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, "capes" are most often used on puppies and young dogs in training for work in order to get them used to wearing "something" across their backs and to alert observers that a dog is in official training. They are a subset of working dog vests/jackets. There isn't enough content to cover just capes. A brief search of Wikipedia disclosed that there was no article covering this particular topic (the broader topic). Normal Op (talk) 00:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of article
Talk:PVC (disambiguation)

message: PVC describes a situation where a player kills many civilians for the sole enjoyment of killing civilians.  This term come directly from Greenonion on the Detheroc server of WoW who was bored of PVP (Player Versus Player) and PVE (Player Versus Environment) and decided to try what he called "PVC" or Player Versus Civilians— Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.65.140 (talk) 14:32, 17 November 2006‎
:   Seriously (in contrast to the section title that i've retrofitted), thank you to the anonymous contributor for showing unusual judgment in offering this information here, where it didn't require a cleanup edit to the article. I, for one, am amused.--Jerzy•t 15:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Wow! indeed)
Talk:Clicker

message: "MMORPG, like World of Warcraft..." is really biased, by my concern.
Wikifriendawesome 23:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MMORPG 

message: Perhaps this should be more of a disambig. page, since many of the 'clicker's referred to are in fact different tools/objects, with different applications...
74.72.221.124 23:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig?
Talk:Public Relations Society of America

message: Hi, I'm following up on my request of March 30, 2020, to make a change to the second paragraph of the "Services" section, in which I requested a change to the second paragraph to this: "PRSA's Public Relations Journal was published from October 1945 to 1995. Its original mission statement was "to carry articles that deal with fundamental public relations problems, as they currently press for solution." In January 2018, PRSA combined Tactics, its monthly newspaper, with The Strategist, its quarterly magazine, to create Strategies & Tactics, an all-new monthly publication."
On January 26, 2020, you did respond to my initial request of Jan. 23, by adding an external link instead of changing the body of the text as I did not provide a source outside PRSA. I am now including below an outside source, so would like to request again that the copy above actually be added to the text if possible, in order to provide clarification to readers. As always, I very much appreciate your help with this.
Thank you.
Rod Granger
Rhdg1 (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strategies & Tactics Update Request... 

message: Hi, regarding my above request to revise information on PRSA's Strategies & Tactics publication, I'm including below a link to an additional outside source. As always, I appreciate your help with this.
Rod Granger
Rhdg1 (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information for Strategies & Tactics Update Request... 

message: Hi, I wanted to check in regarding my request to revise the second paragraph of the "Services" Section. As always, thank you for your help.
Rod Granger
Rhdg1 (talk) Rhdg1 (talk) 15:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Following up on Strategies & Tactics Update Request... 

message: The Code of Ethics is buried in the services section. I think it should be more visible, however (particularly since I wouldn’t think of it as a service). Could a section be created for it (or a joint section for Accreditation and Ethical Code)? Is there a convention for this? Another alternative would be to move it to the history or organization sections. Tiggeritian (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead with separating out the Code of Ethics as there weren't objections. Tiggeritian (talk) 03:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section for Code of Ethics?
Talk:Pet tag

message: How about a Dog-tag that identifies the soldier on the battle field?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.54.132 (talk) 20:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

message: There are dozens of other better ones on Commons, why not one of those instead? SaltySemanticSchmuck (talk) 20:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blurry cover photo
Talk:Canine Good Citizen

message: Eliminated portion dealing with pit bulls at close of entry.  It's unsupported and is conjecture from unsourced pit bull propaganda web sites.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.184.21.126 (talk) 05:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good edit, I think.  That portion shouldn't be there. The Dogfather (talk) 13:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pit Bulls
Talk:UCLA Anderson School of Management

message: * The research titles are just tooooo long. 05:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Research Titles

message: It seems a bit "cheap" to insert three rankings in the intro, let alone in the second sentence of the article. As one user said, "An obsession with rankings belies an underlying lack of confidence in the strength of one's own programs on their own merits."  They would better serve the article if they were incorporated into the "Academics" section, IMO.— DMCer™ 10:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings in the second sentence. 

message: AMR is only a program for full-time students, who make up less than half of the Anderson student body. 2605:E000:150F:8179:0:EBF:721B:E82D (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMR
Talk:Cooper Car Company

message: After coming across this, I was wondering if anybody could translate it? The machine translation I tried was scant help...  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  01:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make the first one a fast one 

message: I notice the inclusion of Ivor Bueb on the list of drivers for the '500.  Any particular reason?  He's not as well known as the others. Number774 (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Ivor The Driver" won Le Mans twice which in my book makes him a lot more notable as a driver than, say, Bernie €cc£e$tone. Mr Larrington (talk) 23:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivor who? 

message: As stated in Subject
I and many others would like to see how Charley Cooper started the company and handed it to his son John Cooper since I worked for both
Many thanks
Frank Boyles  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.127.35 (talk) 13:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the perceived absence of some information in this article necessarily requires the two articles to be merged; the missing information can simply be added to this article - it's perfectly acceptable to have the same information in multiple articles. DH85868993 (talk) 05:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to see this merged with    Charles Cooper (motor manufacturer)
Talk:Senedd constituencies and electoral regions

message: Would be nice to have some official source for the info in this article, especially as regards how constituencies are grouped into regions. I am not finding the official Assembly website much use in this respect. Laurel Bush 14:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official sources 

message: A picture would be worth 1,000 words here! AndrewRT(Talk) 19:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 --Furfur (talk) 08:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Request
Talk:St Giles in the Fields

message: User:Neddyseagoon, you've clearly been beavering away on the St. Giles in the Fields article. As a 'newbie' (how I hate that coinage), it has been fascinating to see how Wikipedia works. At the same time time, as the original writer of the article, it has been a little disheartening to find it gutted, and elements of the sense having been removed. 
*In the first paragraph, for example, it now twice refers to its proximity to Centrepoint, and the linking irony of this being so busy whilst St. Giles was a hermit has been excised for no obvious reason. And that's just the first paragraph. 
:Reinstated, though someone may have pulled that bit on POV grounds.Neddyseagoon - talk 16:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the stuff from the website needs copyediting, but I felt it interesting nonetheless. Neddyseagoon - talk 16:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I think the writer may have been trying to say how the church was now Evangelical and hostile to a candlestand's Anglo-Catholic associations - I'm looking into it.Neddyseagoon - talk 16:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, feel free to edit it again to get rid of this anomalies.Neddyseagoon - talk 16:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed?

message: Is there a reason for not having this at St. Giles in the Fields (with a period after "St")? If not, it should be moved. Recury 20:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Would the individual who uses the logon id Associate Rector please explain why he/she is using this title. There has not been an associate rector at St Giles since the departure of The Rev Dr Julian Davies and it is therefore misleading to refer to oneself as Associate Rector (Interestedparty1944 (talk) 10:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading use of title

message: I did attend a crisis meeting of the Poetry Society at the church a few years ago - so I can see that there is a connection between the poetry world and St Giles - but does anyone know why or how this came about?
ixo (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Poets'Church
Talk:The London Rock and Roll Show

message: The song listing posted previously (under the erroneous header "DVD tracklisting" - this was a movie first; my edit summary contains a typo that renders this point nonsensical - sorry!) listed a number of performances not included in the film and as yet not released commercially. I've revised the list accordingly. 23skidoo 20:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Song listing

message: There is already an article on the movie. There doesn't seem to be anything new to add with an article on the concert: only the movie performances are listed rather than a complete performance list; there is also an unsourced claim that Jagger attended the show. Do we know this? All we know is he was interviewed for the movie. I think the two should be merged. 68.146.70.177 (talk) 19:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is a duplicate

message: I was at this concert and can say that the reason Little Richard was booed, was because he was over-running and people wanted to see Chuck Berry.
But as personal experience isn't enough to edit the page, I'll wait and see if anyone can verify this or try to find a source myself.
Although the whole article is not sourced either. Was the article written from someones personal experience? 
86.159.28.47 (talk) 19:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Booing little Richard

message: I have deleted the unsourced statement that Jerry Lee Lewis is booed because he was allegedly late and drunk. This is a textbook violation of Wikipedia's Biographies of Living Persons policy. There is no indication of Lewis being inebriated in the movie of this concert, and his performance takes place during daylight hours which casts doubt on him being "hours late", too. A google search has failed to turn up any source to back up this claim. Of course if someone can cite a book, a review of the concert, etc. that supports the claim, feel free to put it back. I was tempted to remove the Little Richard reference too (see 86's note above) but it's not as BLP-violating as the Lewis comment. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 23:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Jerry Lee Lewis
Talk:Software architectural model

message: This article was copied, edited, and expanded from a blog post by the author of the blog post.  The original post is at http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik/archive/2006/09/17/759338.aspx
The owner of the blog and author of the entry (myself) give permission to use this definition.--Nickmalik 14:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Pet harness

message: I have seen pigs and even cats wear harnesse that were specifically designed for them. This article is all about pet harnesses. I am going to move the title to "Pet harness" and change what it says about harnesses being only for dogs and provide references. There are literally no existing articles about pet harnesses in general; harnesses used on animals other than dogs, but yet dozens of Wikimedia Commons photos of them and articles and that mention them and link here. SaltySemanticSchmuck (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only dogs wear harnesses. 

message: How are they used for dog training? I fixed the grammar on the section, but it still doesn’t make sense. SaltySemanticSchmuck (talk) 00:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog training harnesses?
Talk:List of Fujitsu products

message: There is a toy called "fin fin"? --80.138.109.168 15:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there was in 1997. It received a certain amount of press attention at the time, but I am under the impression it didn't last long, though I may be wrong. It could be added to the article, if anyone thinks it worthwhile doing so. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fujitsu also make batteries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.65.220.74 (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).--M4gnum0n (talk) 23:42, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Products 

message: The telecom portion of this list is woefully short. In the SONET field, telecom companies extensively have used Fuji devices (FLM-300, FLM-600, etc.) and now they are into much larger capacity transport devices. Are those items to be listed here, or is this just a list of general categories of products? --TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 18:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telecom SONET and Transport devices
Talk:Castell Dinas Brân

message: Major rewrite for my local castle.
It still needs a Layout section. Which I'll do soon.--Cynnydd 15:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New version

message: References are cited viz.
The Castles of Wales, Alan Reid, 1973 () 
Dinas Brân Castle, Dr. Charles Kightly, 2003 published by Denbighshire County Council. 
British Castles, Oman, Charles W. C., 1926 The Great Western Railway, 1989 Dover Books 
all listed in reference section and Harvard references used following paragraphs of text. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cynnydd (talk • contribs) 07:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Hearing dog

message: Two images I've added to Wikipedia Commons, which would be good for this Service Dogs article:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Service_dog_out_shopping.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Service_dog_at_Target.jpg
Would it be okay to use one here?
Zipster969 (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Dogs  Loulggsgsgsgdhhdhdhdhxhxhdg (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog 