lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sino-Korean vocabulary

message: Doesn't the Thousand Character Classic postdate the Han dynasty by several centuries? -- Visviva 09:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology

message: It would be nice to see the readings of the Japanese Kanji and The readings of the Chinese characters in English beside the words in parenthesis like the Korean words are. I want to see the comparison between Korean pronunciations and the readings of the Chinese characters.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.79.146.130 (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readings 

message: Please add romanisations to every word in every language. I wish I could read the words, but I can't, but I'm still interested in seeing the similarities and differences between the source words and the loaned counterparts in Japanese and Korean. Skomakar'n (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanisations 

message: I was watching a new Korean show on Hulu today called "Faith".
In the pilot, there is a scene in which a main character visits a fortune teller who reads her fortune from sticks in "Sino-Korean".
I would be interested in seeing a section on this page that cites the use of Sino-Korean in occult or traditional religious practices in contemporary Korea, and especially a discussion of why this particular usage seemed to be unintelligible to the characters in the aforementioned scene.
This article as it stands implies that Sino-Korean words are recognizable and in current usage, but the television show implied that there is a specific vocabulary which has a place in Korean subcultures, but not in popular culture.
Of course, it could have just been a bad translation into English.
See the video in question here: http://www.hulu.com/stand_alone/441561af186433abcfea944607eb08d5?continuous_play_mode=2&continuous_play=on&continuous_play_sort=
The scene in question begins at approximately 47:45  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fraktol (talk • contribs) 19:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary Usage Note: 

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=tVcdNRvwoDkC&pg=PA121#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=tVcdNRvwoDkC&pg=PA122#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 17:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Systems: ˜aœ Linguistic Introduction  By Geoffrey Sampson  

message: The article Sino-Japanese vocabulary describes the phonetic correspondences between Middle Chinese, Modern Chinese, and Japanese vocabulary. This article would feel more complete if it explained the rules for phonetic correspondences between Chinese and Korean for Sino-Korean vocabulary (e.g. final  in Middle Chinese becoming  in Korean, as in   →  ). I don't know of any reliable sources for this, though, so I would appreciate it if someone else added this information. Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 05:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phonetic correspondences to Chinese
Talk:Sohn Kee-chung

message: For future reference: http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2011/aug/27/sohn-kee-chung-olympics-korea -Location (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:South Chungcheong Province

message: This: "The new district will be named Sejong Special Autonomous City, and is to replace Seoul as the future capital of the Republic of Korea. But, in 2009, the replaced Seoul as new national capital was violating South Korean Constitution by Constitution Court, and now Sejong City was only to be National Administrative Capital and Secondary capital alongside Seoul with representing about 36 government ministers and agencies, including Prime Minister office in 2015." needs to be put into proper English, but I'm not sure precisely what it is supposed to say. Kdammers (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: Why is that section named sister city if it’s a province? PAper GOL (talk) 10:22, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twin-sister (City)
Talk:Chaebol

message: Just an example:
“15 August is recognized in South Korea as Liberation Day. This is when the president forgives the chairmen for their infractions to ensure they remain in power in their companies.” 76.94.201.10 (talk) 02:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, that sentence is pushing an agenda, I'll remove it. It doesn't reflect its reference. I'll give this article a more detailed look another day. toobigtokale (talk) 09:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Even the main picture of the article is biased... We need to represent the overall concept, not immediately show protests against it. toobigtokale (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article seems super biased 

message: When you sort by revenue, billions come before trillions due to a larger number in front. Zorblin (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting in categories section not working. 

message: Do we italicize the title and term, as per MOS:FOREIGNITALIC? It has about as common usage as hanbok imo, in that its use is generally limited to Korea. toobigtokale (talk) 09:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Zaibatsu is italicized fyi; I think we should italicize this too. toobigtokale (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually nvm, I may be wrong. List of English words of Korean origin shows that it's listed in several dictionaries. toobigtokale (talk) 03:50, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italicize?
Talk:South Manchuria Railway

message: ----
- added stub tag, hoping that someone will bring it up to the standard of the China Far East  Railway article..
roncerito 00:40, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

message: What cities did this railroad connect?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.180.182.145 (talk) 11:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stations? 

message: I am amazed to see the complete lack of discussion here as to the role the Railway played in the origins of the Second Sino-Japanese War. The South Manchuria Railway, the tiny stretch of Japanese territory along it, the largely autonomous Kwantung Army, and the security concerns of both that Army and officials in Tokyo, were the crucial initiating factors in the Japanese invasion of Manchuria. A "see also" section with no explanation is not sufficient. LordAmeth 13:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WWII?

message: This article needs information about what happened to the line(s) after 1945. What company took them over, and are they still in use? --NE2 16:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I partially answered my own question - the main/only line is now the Harbin-Dalian railway of China Railways. --NE2 17:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disposition
Talk:Temple name

message: This article is valuable in its own right, despite lack of references. But, where do temple names of commoners go? Pawyilee 09:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "They should not be confused with era names. Compared to posthumous names, the use of temple names is more exclusive. Both titles were given after death to an emperor or king, but unlike the often elaborate posthumous name, a temple name always consists of only two characters"
These sentences need more work. They are confusing. I couldn't understand what temple name is after all. Is temple name also given after death or is it given on some other occasion? What does the 3rd sentence above mean by "both titles"--"era name and posthumous name" or "posthumous name and temple name". Gantuya eng (talk) 07:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what's the difference?
Talk:Three Jewels Temples

message: I have restored this article a modified version of the way it was on 15 September 2004.  This means restoring the Buddhism category box and the original, non-templated name table.  So that the boxes are not quite as obtrusive, I have narrowed the name table's width so that there is more room for text.  -Sewing - talk 15:15, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Three Kingdoms of Korea

message: I don't know much about ancient Korean history; can someone put at least an approx date range for the time period in the first paragraph of the lead and in the short description? toobigtokale (talk) 07:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This issue still stands toobigtokale (talk) 08:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date range?
Talk:Yi Hwang

message: Accidie/Though thunder splits the mountains,/Deaf men will not hear / And though in the noonday Heaven /The sun burns white and clear,/Blind men will not see it./But we, thus eared and eyed,/Lack even the lame excuses/Infirmities provide./(Translated by Graeme Wilson)
*Removed the above poem from previous edit due to lack of proper references. Also, finds it quite impossible (and unnecessary) to fill the content with every work of Yi Hwang. Nuyos (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed poem

message: I have just reverted the importance class within the Philosophy project, back into HIGH, after having carefully read the description of the classes made by User:Carchasm who has changed it into LOW. I have added extensive bibliography, so that those who read may understand that this first-class Korean philosopher is really of high importance to the world philosophy, albeith he might not yet be sufficiently known to some. noychoH (talk) 23:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection here - thanks for adding sources! :)  - car chasm (talk) 02:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted Importance class
Talk:Transport in North Korea

message: --195.245.232.21 09:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any information on Korean Airports? 

message: poezda.net shows a train service between Moscow and Pyongyang via the Russia/DPRK border at Khasan/Tumangan, leaving Moscow on the 11th and 25th of each month.   (If the link fails to work, go to www.poezda.net and do an advanced search on train 2.)
--Kain 09:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail link with Russia 

message: No cars?! What kind of life is that?! That's what I like best of Europe and Mexico!!--Fluence (talk) 22:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a lot, no.  On the plus side, you dont have to worry to much about getting hit by a car. Bonewah (talk) 04:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No cars?! 

message: Most countries have a "Rail transport in" page so I don't know why North Korea doesn't.  I intend to move the rail transport text to the rail transport page. Are there any objections? Biscuittin (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections received. Text moved. Biscuittin (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail transport 

message: This article repeatedly cites New Focus International, which is a website that no longer even exists. The founder of the website of New Focus International, Jang Jin-sung was accused but acquitted of raping two women. According to this New York Times article fellow defectors doubted some of his claims about himself. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/17/world/asia/north-korea-metoo-defector.html
I read the archived article and it doesn't pass the smell test. The idea that you can walk up to a traffic cop with a bottle of beer and have them commandeer a car from the North Korean elite is too unlikely for me. So is the idea that it's even easier to buy gas from traffic cops who siphoned the gas as a kind of ticket, instead of just buying gas from a gas station. I think there needs to be another source, like another defector needs to back this up. North Korea might have a system that is corrupt and inefficient, but that doesn't mean you should believe everything you hear when the only source is a simple person. --47.145.107.214 (talk) 07:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: New Focus International Is a Dead Website and Might Not Be Credible
Talk:Tripitaka Koreana

message: There is an (at least one) electronic edition of the TK on CD (or DVD, dont know). The one I have seen seems to be named (beside Korean characters):
:Tripitaka Koreana 2004
:COPYRIGHT@2004 by The Research Institut of Tripitaka Koreana
I could still not find any way to get this, or even more information, an ISBN or something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.60.117.55 (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Electronic version available?

message: What language is the name "Tripitaka Koreana"? Is it Latin, Sanskrit or something else? 98.110.10.64 (talk) 03:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tripitaka is Sanskrit, Koreana is a Latin adjective form based on a borrowed place name.  Of course the language of the text is Chinese... AnonMoos (talk) 01:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What language is the name? 

message: The RfC by Dorje108 states that:
"I propose that texts written by Buddhist writers and teachers that explain basic Buddhist concepts should be considered secondary sources as long as they meet the criteria specified in the guidelines (regardless of whether or not the writer has Western academic training). Do you support this?"
Please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buddhism
Robert Walker (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC: Are texts written by Buddhist writers and teachers that explain basic Buddhist concepts reliable secondary sources?

message: How can anybody read this without realizing it's almost certainly a nationalist series of lies? such superlatives, such ridiculous claims, such implicit faith! They were damaged as soon as they were removed from their old home? they have survived 750 years in mint condition? they are the most important Buddhist corpus? give me a break!
2607:FEA8:AA03:9600:B943:EACD:F2A2:197F (talk) 23:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article strains credulity
Talk:Wiman Joseon

message: The Records of the Grand Historian is the only extant contemporary account of the founding of Wiman's Joseon state. I'm afraid there is no mention of any powerful kingdom of Gojoseon he destroyed and replaced. Any other material regarding this period of Korean history comes from documents which were written hundreds of years later, and therefore cannot be authenticated. Archaeological searches have also not made any discoveries of fabulous lost civilizations. Thus this is the only verifiable account we have. The following is a passage taken from the Records of the Grand Historian from Wikipedia's entry on Wiman / Wei Man :
(Wei Man, known as Wiman in Korean, was a man from the State of Yan of China who established a kingdom in north-western Korea in the 2nd century BC. He was the first figure in the history of Korea to have been recorded in documents from the same time period. The Records of the Grand Historian simply calls him Man, so the surname Wei was probably added later.)
Man served Prince Lu Wan of the Yan Principality. Although Lu Wan was an old ally of the Han Emperor Gao, he was eventually suspected of rebellion and attacked. Lu Wan sought refuge with the Xiongnu in 195 B.C, while Man fled to the east.
According to the Records of the Grand Historian, Man led 1,000 men, dressed in non-Chinese costume and crossed the border river of Paesu/Peishui (浿水; probably Chŏngchŏn River). Based on the upper and lower fortresses of the former Qin Dynasty, he organized the natives named the Jinbeon/Zhenfen and the Joseon and Chinese refugees from Yan and Qi, and came to the crown. Man's capital was named Wanggeom/Wangxian (王險, generally identified as P'yŏngyang).[1] Since the Han Empire was not completely stabilized yet, the Governor of Liaodong appointed Man as an outer subject, provided that he did not prevent natives going up to the empire. The appointment is dated at 191 or 192 BCE.[2] With the support of the Han Empire, he expanded his territory by conquering many small towns. His kingdom was eventually conquered by Emperor Wu in 108 B.C during the reign of his grandson Ugeo.Wayne Leigh (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Bare Facts of the Only Historical Account of Wiman

message: http://byeongjupark.wordpress.com/article/gojoseon-2zvfgrgyend5c-5/ a good article with more information to add to your topic.(Armorbeast (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info
Talk:Wonju

message: :Wonju city and Wonju/Wonseong county (원주시, 원성군) were united 11 years ago, in 1995.  See English-language history of Wonju.  The map should -- and as far as I can tell, does -- correspond to the modern Wonju city, which covers the former territory of both the city and the county.  -- Visviva 07:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  county or city 

message: Could someone explain the difference between the light gray and the dark gray regions on the map, as there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation on the page nor the image. 121.75.57.99 (talk) 00:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture

message: Are we sure that 간도 was not in fact from 間道?
218.49.116.218 02:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kando [[kanji]]

message: I added the same map here I added for the other prefecture-level divisions, though I saw there was one here before. Feel free to change if you feel my map is worse, though personally I value conformity when it comes to map standards. It just looks better, IMO (with conformity). Also, there were some differences as to the Korean names in the two tables. Anyone who actually knows a bit of Korean, please correct if wrong.Maggern87 (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: Chinese wiki includes the history of this region that started from pre-historical era.
Both Mongolian Yuan and Jurchen Jin dynasty had history of governing this region. Can someone please add/translate this part?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.33.81.62 (talk) 05:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone add the history of Yanbian before Ming dynasty? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :West Korea and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#West Korea until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  feminist (talk) 16:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "West Korea" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Yi I

message: This article on a truly important Korean is in need of references. 64.229.149.239 21:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Solar energy

message: Solar energy 117.206.251.165 (talk) 08:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis of solar energy for project work 

message: Currently, solar power as a higher quality article is both redundant and losing viewership, as "solar energy" is a more popular term than "solar power". This article should talk about energy from the Sun in general, not just about it as electricity. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea - I suggest you go ahead. Also maybe the photovoltaics section should be removed. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

text: @CactiStaccingCrane December views show this continues. I tried removing photovoltaics from here - don’t know if that will make a difference Chidgk1 (talk) 09:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Moved a para from lead to Solar_power#Cost_per_watt Chidgk1 (talk) 09:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Maybe floating solar and solar aircraft should be moved elsewhere? If so where? Chidgk1 (talk) 09:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication with [[solar power]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ruizhouruizhou (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: More information for the solar energy systems in Egypt.
The main difference between poly crystalline panels and mono crystalline panels?
Ans: the main difference is the panel efficiency, mono crystalline efficiency have reached 23%. 
Sunlight solar energy is Sol agent for Quantum Solar and the importer for Ja solar in Egypt for more than 5 years
صن لايت للطاقة المتجددة الوكيل الحصرة لشركة Quantum Solar و مستورد معتمد لشركة JA solar فى مصر لاكثر من 5 سنوات. 2C0F:FC89:108:BB5F:4C48:29D5:7416:EEB7 (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk:Energy in Egypt or Talk:Solar panel might be a better place for you to suggest changes but please first read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest Chidgk1 (talk) 19:54, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunlight للطاقة المتجددة 

message: Solar energy is infinite so it never runs out 2600:4040:5FD6:1300:7994:3979:8A29:FA89 (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar entry
Talk:Yoido Full Gospel Church

message: This page should be restored to Yoido Full Gospel Church, per our standing naming conventions, which prefer customary romanizations (where they exist) over strict RR or MR.  Unfortunately I made a mistake when attempting to undo the initial move, which is why the page is now at a title which is not correct by any standard.  Sorry!  Hopefully this will be fixed soon. -- Visviva 08:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Regardless of the ROK spelling conventions, YOIDO is the name used on the international correspondence/letterhead of the church (I know, because I've corresponded with it myself). I have restored the original spelling, thank you very much.  David Cannon 11:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Yoido has hovered around a very respectable 250,000 members for many years now. They count all present and past members in their 850,000 number, not actual current members. To change this lofty number would only cause them to lose face. I wish they would own up to the actual number of current members in the church today and not do this. It discredits them in my opinion. They're still the largest church in the world though... with a not-so-close second of 160,000 in San Salvador (Elim Church).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.209.183 (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 850,000 Members. Not accurate, regardless who says it
Talk:Jus ad bellum

message: Could somebody say what these are?  I can't understand at all.  moink 19:04, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: What are these?

message: Can someone with a better grasp of the history address Robert Kolb's claim that the doctrine dates only from the 1920s? Most sources claim it was invented by Augustine of Hippo in the early fifth century - including our own page on Augustine! Securiger 09:08, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This is because the term jus ad bellum was invented and codified at that point. Augustine put forth the initial ideas about conduct in waging and starting wars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.66.77 (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Origination date

message: lets merge this bitch----69.105.108.161 (talk) 00:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: kemp dog wouldnt want to merge this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.216.106 (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Time for merge!

message: The UN Charter Article 51 should be mentioned in the section "Principles of jus ad bellum", in particular the last sentence of that article.
83.233.204.43 (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UN Charter Article 51 

message: Can we add this somehow?
 Blair was told it would not be a legal war.
Wythy (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iraq war 

message: I'm pretty sure my Latin ("right to war") is correct but it's a very literal translation and my Latin is rusty. Could someone double check it? Delukiel (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin translation