lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iain Noble

message: I've not tried the whisky mentioned at the end of the article but is it really called "Te bheac nan Eillen"? Because the correct spelling would be Tè Bheag nan Eilean.
An Siarach
I have and it is. Ben MacDui (Talk) 17:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As seen as Sir Iain Noble was the 3rd. Baronet, where is the succession box to indicate who his predecessor and successor (if any) were and are? - (202.89.140.194 (talk) 01:11, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: so add one! Kernel Saunters (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Baronetcy succession box - where is it?
Talk:Arpitania

message: Hallo,
An anonymous said: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arpitany
What do you think about that? Dahu 18:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, Arpitanie does not exist either on a scientific ground or on a linguistic ground. Please, do what you can to merge this article with Franco-Provençal_language. You can contact me on my en: talk page or on fr:User_Talk:Schiste. Thanks a lot :) Schiste 23:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If a political movement which is notable by Wikipedia standards says that it does exist, then that's enough to get it covered in Wikipedia, whatever the scientific linguistic facts are.  But if reputable mainstream scholars have said that such claims are false, then we can also report on that... AnonMoos (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This doesn't exist 

message: :
What is Daunia? Something to do with the Piemont?  An alternate name for the dialect of Celle? —Tamfang (talk) 05:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daunia 
Talk:Lagoon triggerfish

message: I note that FishBase doesn't actually list "Picasso Triggerfish" as a known name, although Google shows plenty of hits (hmm, fishbase vs google, which is more weighty??). Stan 18:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: FishBase actually lists a dozen names in English, sort their page by language to see them all grouped together. "White-banded triggerfish" is FAO-blessed, but Google gives it a paltry 40 hits. Other FishBase names do similarly poorly. While I'm generally loath to go against the 1000+ experts who contribute to FishBase, and Google hit counts should always be treated with suspicion, 100-1 results are hard to explain away. So "Picasso Triggerfish" is OK by me. (Re latin, I've heard mention of an effort to come up with official English-language names for all fishes, a la birds, so latin not necessarily a better choice.) Stan 23:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a redirect for Picasso fish as that name is often used according to Google. And a side related issue I moved the article to Picasso triggerfish to get the capitalization in accordance with WP:FISH.
This isn't the Humuhumu-nukunuku-apua'a, the Humu is rhinecanthus rectangulus see <http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2006/Bills/HB1982_SD1_.htm> Doggo 20:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks, I have removed the two-species claim from both articles, until and unless some better sourcing than was previously there can be found. Softlavender (talk) 23:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: Blackbar triggerfish appears to be the most common name for this species.  I would move the page, but it needs a RfM due to previous moves. According to some books, the Picasso fish is rhinecanthus rectangulus, however, it looks like it is actually Rhinecanthus assasi. —Viriditas | Talk 08:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackbar triggerfish

message: I believe some form of protection is necessary for this page currently. A video of a lagoon triggerfish has become a "meme" recently, and there has been some minor vandalism on this page as a result. I do not have the power to enforce protection, though I do believe a protection period of 1-3 weeks would be beneficial, as memes appear to be short-lived.
77.58.237.70 (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection necessary?
Talk:Weapons Cache Case

message: Finland is not a member of NATO, right, but Operation Gladio also included non-NATO members. A link in the "see also" subsection is not much. Although this particular weapons cache case might have no relation whatsoever with Gladio (in the basis that it was done by Finnish officers without US assistance), stay-behind movements have left dozens of such caches all over Europe, so there is a relation between them. Tazmaniacs 18:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, so leave the link to Gladio as a parallel, but remove the indication that Finland was a NATO country and the case has ties to Gladio. Rackham 15:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Gladio 

message: I am curious where the source is for the numbers '1488' people convicted, and '1-4' months in prison.
It is possibly just a coincidence, but both those sets of numbers are popular in neo nazi circles, with 14 referring to the 'ad' of adolf, and 88 referring to hh - heil hitler, often these are combined in tattoos to be '1488'; which makes me curious as to what their basis is. Of course this could all be nothing.
Sovietblobfish (talk) 13:24, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting numbers
Talk:Abdul Jabbar Naeemi

message: The article has an adulatory tone that is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. It reads like political propoganda. Rodney Boyd 18:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lufia II: Rise of the Sinistrals

message: The very first paragraph on the article states Lufia II was released in Europe in 1996, and the release section says it was released in Australia in 1997, but the box to the right of it just says it was released to PAL territories in 1997.
If the article is more specific about what year Lufia II released in Europe and what year Lufia II released in Australia, then perhaps the infobox should be more specific, with EU and AU split into 1996 and 1997 respectively.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.248.218 (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In infobox, PAL should be split into EU and AU
Talk:Lufia: The Ruins of Lore

message: The current Criticism section seems relatively biased stating that the game was buggy and met with "harsh criticism" while citing no references to back this up. While some fans may have no liked it the game actually got fairly positive reviews earning an aggregated score of 76/100 from Metacritic. I'm changing the section to reflect this.
S. Luke 11:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Hi folks
I went through and cleaned up the second person "you"s strewn about. Further editing may be needed to make the page read better.
Note: This page reads like a "Tips and Tricks" page in certain section, this will also need to be fixed up at some point.
Specifically: "It's a good idea to switch jobs between the three to ensure a large variety of moves for each character, such as healing and attack spells for everyone. A typical setup would be to make both Eldin and Torma assume fighting-style jobs while Rami assumes magical-oriented ones, though this reduces diversity in skill among the three."
This part goes beyond explaining the game mechanics and gives game advice, which is not the express purpose of wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nee316 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleaned up second person
Talk:The Nanny Diaries

message: As I understand it, the surname "X" is analogous to "Bishop of D" and "M sur M" from Les Misérables by Victor Hugo. It has nothing to do with Malcolm X or The X's, right? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 17:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And not to the ex-wife in Richard Ford's The Sportswriter? Daniel Case 03:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I always thought it was the whole "names changed to protect privacy" type of X.130.95.106.128 03:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname X
Talk:Byrd Amendment

message: Uhm, why is the sentence on the US failing to bring legislation in line with international obligations in italics?  It shouldn't be, to my eyes. Moonsword 18:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://www.eurunion.org/News/press/2006/20060030.htm 1 May 2006 needs consideration: ten countries plus the EU. Also additional counterbalancing measures. There seems to be reluctance to deal with criticisms of US policy: I wonder why that might be. Querulist 16:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating
Talk:Lunar Legend

message: While going through stale userspace drafts, I came across User:Nall/Sandbox3, a draft of this page. I have merged the reception section into this article, but other sections of it may be usable. I have redirected that draft here; anyone interested in expanding this article may find useful content in its history. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do that. Thanks for the note!--Martin IIIa (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Usable text
Talk:District of Columbia's at-large congressional district

message: I replaced previous content to add new information in line with the intent of the article and consistent with the WP:USC naming conventions.  The information contained in the previous version is found in other articles more appropriatly named.  --G1076 18:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox needs to be updated; this should be the same information as for the District as a whole, per the 2010 Census, right? Qqqqqq (talk) 13:33, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Productive forces

message: >Produktivkraefte< are not Productive forces. Using the German and the English Capital, the used term is "productivity of labour" (original writing). Cf. i.e. Marx (1976): 13 and Marx (1986): 54
Marx, Karl (1976): Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, London
Marx, Karl (1986): Das Kapital. Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals, Bd. 1, Berlin
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have yet to defend why the Theory of Productive Forces should be in the same article as the Marxist analysis of productive forces. (Not that it really matters that much; no one reads these explanatory things anyway, as evidenced by you and me being the only ones to pay attention to them.) 71.125.171.8 19:00, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  German 

message: I need the answer to the above question, please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.159.162.139 (talk) 13:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can we assess productivity of labour force in our company and what use is it?
Talk:Game Arts

message: Wow, this is just sad excuse for a Wiki page, especially when you consider the influence Game Arts has had on the video game industry.  Somebody add in some information! --M.Neko 00:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Unaffiliated voter

message: Does anyone think this page sounds a lot more like a motivational speech than a Wikipedia article? It is incredibly biased, especially with the author's use of "we." Example: "While you will find us in all walks of life, ethnic backgrounds and social movements, the majority of us are the Real American Middle Class." I mean, come on. If that's not pure opinion, I don't know what is.
Lcduke 19:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Alot of people don't realize that unaffiliated voter are frauds, most of them are associated with a political party but choose not to stand under its label.   Waterjuice (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 08 

message: It is not clear to me why this page is not rolled into Independent_(voter) or else identified as specifically USA and linked from there as a "main page".
The external link to http://unaffiliated.us/ appears to be bogus URL (i.e., a page devoid of relevant content, being a blank wordpress blog page for some 3-4 months with no past entries as of this date 2010-02-15.)  Not one of the other external links at Independent_(voter) is at this page, which is immediately suspect.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grshiplett (talk • contribs) 23:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bogus website
Talk:Puerto Rico's at-large congressional district

message: the ethnic compound : 80.5% White + 8.5% Black+ 0.2% Asian + 98.8% Hispanic + 0.4% Native American + 6.8% other
this makes 192% leaving out the decimals, does that make sense ?
User:Mdupont 12.13.74.72 (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  192% 

message: from the article Demographics_of_Puerto_Rico
Ethnic Groups (2010):CIA World Factbook Found at: CIA World Factbook > Central America and Caribbean > Puerto Rico > People > Ethnic Groups. Retrieved June 8, 2009. Confirmed June 19, 2010.2010 U.S. Census Retrieved March 3, 2011. Confirmed March 19, 2011.
* White 75.8%; (mostly Spanish origin)
* Black 12.4%;
* Asian 0.2%;
* Amerindian 0.5%;
there is no separation of white and hispanic.
James Michael DuPont (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Free cash flow

message: The Uses section contained an inline citation to a book called "Zen & the Art of Masturbation: The End of the Aeon at The Spank the Monkey Café – A Farce or Love Story, I’m Not Certain Which." It's on Google Books. Based on a few pages I saw there, I doubt it's what we could call a reliable source. I'm guessing it's vandalism, so I deleted it. I would be happy to reinstate it, if someone can show me evidence that it's not a prank, has something to do with free cash flow and is worthy of citation on Wikipedia. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted possible vandalism 

message: Greetings Wikipedians! While many formulas are cited herein, it is not clear where their source was. I suspect they came from the Brealey and Stewart books cited under References, but we can't be sure because those books are not linked to inline citations. To rectify that problem I found a section in Ross/Westerfield/Jordan that provides support for calculation almost identical to the previous editor's first formula. The method shown in my edit has a slightly different treatment of taxes (it simply subtracts taxes, as opposed to mutiplying by (1-tax rate). But the result should be the same. My method is, I believe, easier to understand and offers the reader an inline citation to a reliable source for those that wish to verify that the formula is correct -- something that's very important, when we're writing about calculations and students are probably a key audience. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead and first calculation method
Talk:Bread pudding

message: • why not some recipies?
:done Quillaja (talk) 04:32, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a recipe that I use --Roly (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: recipe

message: • Budín de pan?! Who came up with that? Try pudín de pan.JoeIcarus (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's "Buddin". That's the way it's pronounced. 72.231.24.33 (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: spanish

message: What's "Wet Nelly" got to do with bread pudding? Am I missing something? --Roly (talk) 21:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's almost as if it's literally the first result on Google or something... http://www.foodsofengland.co.uk/wetnelly.htm. JesseRafe (talk) 12:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

text: The National Trust here confirms it was "a local Liverpool favourite" but also says: "It was a moist version of Nelson Cake, a Lancashire fruit cake, hence the name Wet Nelly!" Martinevans123 (talk) 12:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that NT recipe does depict it as similar to bread pudding and nothing like the Nelson Cake I'm familiar with. I wonder where the Wet Nelly name really came from. --Roly (talk) 13:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

text:  I've added a link to the NT web page, to explain the redirection. --Roly (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "John Lennon used to love Ringo Starr's Wet Nellie" ... allegedly. But you could try asking at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wet Nelly
Talk:Challenger flag

message: Too bad the flag is now being used as a partisan campaign prop. 71.191.96.244 (talk) 16:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Political usage
Talk:Moldovan Police

message: Here is an interesting perspective on the use of torture in Moldovan prisons. Perhaps this information should be included? Cossack 19:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tales of Destiny 2

message: Some sources for future editors who want to improve and expand the article: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Most of them are in Japanese, but Google Translate does a reasonable job of helping you get the gist of it. I have no idea how many of them are archived. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding another one. --ProtoDrake (talk) 08:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Tales of Destiny

message: I think the remake should eventually get its own page, as it is clearly a full on remake and will consist of many differences in comparison to the original.--Claude 00:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that would be fine as its own section. It looks like relatively extensive remake, I doubt it'll be so drastically different plotwise and so on (like ToP's SNES -> PS1 remake, but this will probably be a bit more different) --melodiester 02:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Wild Arms Alter Code: F has its own page apart from the original, but I'd be more willing to wait at this point to see just how different the ToD remake is from the PS1 version before deciding anything just yet.  I'm sure it'll have a much more fleshed out story, and the battle system does look quite a bit different, but unless the remake's page has enough new info to stand on its own, it may end up just repeating the same information from the original article. Nall 06:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake 
Talk:List of statutory instruments of the United Kingdom, 1999

message: In order to prevent duplication of effort, it might be a good idea for editors to state which part of the list they are currently working on. Road Wizard 19:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Series 2601 - 2700 now complete Road Wizard 20:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progress 

message: Split  - Article is over 300 kilobytes, and should be split into articles of between 500 to 1000 Statutory Instruments.  Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article?
Talk:Tales of Rebirth

message: The artworks of characters are oddly placed and do not match their descriptions' positions, badly aligned. In fact, one of them even pushed himself in the next section. This needs fixing. --Delf 20:02, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious Image Problem 

message: Considering the game hasn't been officially translated to english, and this article is very inactive, this is probably unlikely, but can anyone provide a source for this? There is a source currently, but it's entirely in Japanese and from a hardcopy source, so there's a number of things keeping me from verifying its accuracy. Can anyone verify the source or provide an English one? Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me  14:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspired by Yugoslavia?

message: It says here that the game is explored in a side on view where the camera zooms in and out. This is not true, any footage of the game disproves this. 
Secondly it says there’s no explorable overworld map, when there is. Any footage from the game disproves this. 
The citation for this miss information is a broken link to an article that was written before the game released. 81.111.197.91 (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't played the game, nor do I have access to check, but the best way to fix this would be to find a new replacement source and rewrite it to whatever that says. Alternatively, the broken link is to a website that is still online, so the content is likely still on the internet somewhere. Sergecross73 msg me 19:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exploration description is wrong
Talk:Mamady Keïta

message: Does he prefer to always have his name spelled with an umlaut over the "i"?  It isn't always spelled that way but I notice it is that way on the Tam Tam Mandingue website.  Badagnani 19:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of surname

message: The Tam Tam Mandingue site lists different cities for the European schools than the Wikipedia page does.  This should be fixed.  Badagnani 19:33, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of Tam Tam Mandingue schools
Talk:Somitogenesis

message: * Somitogenesis - Did what I could, but someone who knows more about it should take it from here. --Improv 19:26, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: The lead sentence/paragraph/section needs to be rewritten to be accessible to the general reader. Per MOS:INTRO "The subject should be placed in a context with which many readers could be expected to be familiar." --MegaSloth (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Lowe (band)

message: I feel this probably ought to be rewritten... the History section doesn't read particularly well. I assume it was written by someone for whom English was a second language (not trying to be down on them, just saying).
McFlynnTHM 19:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dagan mcdowell

message: Though the article on this subject already exists at Dagen McDowell and though this page likely needn't be a redirect to that page, my PROD was removed.  I'd PRODded because I wasn't convinced that this was a speedyable (i.e., "commerical") copyvio; I am now convinced, though, that, inasmuch as the primary purpose of the FOX News page is to promote a personality and thus to increase viewership, the page is a commerical page and the copyvio should be speedied.  Joe 19:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy tag
Talk:Storage tank

message: did you include the developing tank for e.g. type 135 fotografic film on spools holding 1,65 (=36 exposures 24x36 mm, but seldom 3.3 m) produced by Paterson, for one or more spools ... Helium4 (talk) 16:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  developing tank 

message: I would suggest removing the section on the etymology of the word 'tank'.  In my view that has no place in and contributes nothing to this article, and instead belongs to a dictionary (and indeed is already covered in Wiktionary. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing etymology section? 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tank (for storing liquid in). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Interstellarity T 🌟 11:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tank (for storing liquid in) listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tank (for storing liquid). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tank (for storing liquid) listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]