Talk:Pornography addiction

message: I am not a Christian, but I don't think that Christian means "biased hack who cannot tell the truth".
If anything, Bowman is higher on the academic pecking order than Martinez-Gilliard and Dhuffar-Pottiwal. He seems to be in favor of a porn addiction diagnosis, nevertheless he recognizes the facts from ICD-11 for what they are.
So, yes, there are differences of opinion, but the hard facts (i.e. CBSD is no addiction) are not disputed. tgeorgescu (talk)  05:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tgeorgescu: And what about this source? Potatín5 (talk) 10:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like a valid opinion. But we are discussing facts about ICD-11 vs. opinions about ICD-11. I have no WP:BALL to deny Bowman's claim that CSBD will be later recognized as an addiction. But we are not there yet. tgeorgescu (talk)  00:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

text:  These being said, the DSM has deprecated the term "addiction", and that alone should tell you that "porn addiction" belongs to a bygone era of psychiatry. Addiction is so 1970. Neurosis, neurasthenia, and addiction are not 21st century psychiatric diagnoses. The public uses these terms a lot, but medical insurance companies do not cover such diagnoses. Any diagnosis of addiction, and the medical insurance won't pay your bill. The term "addiction" belongs to popular psychology, not to mainstream psychiatry. tgeorgescu (talk)  23:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

text: So, I don't think there is going to be a diagnosis of "sexual addiction" or "pornography addiction" because the term "addiction" is no longer used. And "sex OCD" and "porn OCD" seem like useless additions to OCD. APA is reluctant to adopt merely verbal tricks. tgeorgescu (talk)  11:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian POV 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Pornography addiction →  – "Pornography addiction is not how the scientific community discusses this topic. The title suggests a consensus on the topic. A dedicated chapter in the Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder page named "Porn addiction" should be created. Forsen1337 (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you mean to propose a merge of the two articles? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about just adding it as a subcategory to the other article Forsen1337 (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 October 2023 

message: Editors, the article Effects of pornography is largely written based on primary sources and promoting the claim that pornography addiction is a real phenomena. Best for experienced editors on this topic to begin working to improve the article to reflect scientific consensus, as the articles cover similar ground. Zenomonoz (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Effects of pornography]] – related problems