Talk:List of years in film

message: *What happened to 2009 in film? -AMK152 02:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009

message: I have made a thorough round through all the years, making for each a section "Films released in xxxx", in the place of "Other films" or other similar occasional headings, making sure each film mentioned in Awards and Top grossing was added to it's release year (as stated in the corresponding article, or the amg if without article). I have given a steady form to the year navigation (to the top right of each article) and fixed many links to point to the film articles (still, many remain linking to irrelevant articles). Also I have made an effort to keep the index box as uniform through the years as possible, turnung some subheadings to bold text.
In Awards I have reduced some subheaders to bold (like already done in some years, where "Academy Awards" had been turned to Awards and under it (in capitalized bold) "Academy Awards", "Golden Globe" (with inlined underlined bold sub-titles for 2 sub-types) and "BAFTA". My opinion is that "Directors Guild" is also important for their choice of director of the year. I also don't see why Cannes' "Palme d'Or" is not equally present, since they also accept english films for their awards and offer a more european art film view.
In the years of the 2000's surely the information on money, by being tabled over Awards, breaks the balance. Has there really been a shift in judging films by economical success over quality? If so, this issue is worth mentioning, in some relevant article. My view is that Awards should preceede Top grossing, all through the years, and that Academy Awards should be Awards with subsections as mentioned above. Technically I see no harm as it is, so long as there is an inclusive list (not table) for the films of each year, so that entries can be easilly added and crossed with other lists. As for encyclopedic presentation, I think a peer should tell us what is best. Hoverfish 10:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shift in importance of films? 

message: Jesus "Titties Fuckin'" Christ, who the fuck kept changing my movies that are the best ever to the movies I hate so much. Aargh,if it's some kunt or dick changing it, I'm callin' the fuckin' cops and endup in Juvie!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny66.6 (talk • contribs) 05:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing in 2006 and 2005 

message: I have to ask, what exactly is the criteria for the films listed for each year? They come off as unnecessary, at least if they continue to be added without any point of reference citing why exactly they were important to their respective years. 131.247.37.177 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer is quite obvious. If someone -- anyone -- has a favorite film, he or she adds it. No other criteria. (Please note: I'm not agreeing with this method, but that clearly is the method). Cresix (talk) 01:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for film listed? 

message: My two cents: 2014 through 2017 shpuld remain as separate articles, but not 2018. There have been two AfDs in recent months; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 in film (2nd nomination).  I think we should hold off on re-creating the 2018 article until June 2014. Bearian (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 through 2017 

message: People who edit this page may be intrested in this discussion about cutting down on excessive material. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: The Dark Knight Rises should be add to 2012. Imean why would you have 2/3 of the trilogy listed? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dark Knight Rises 

message: It is obvious: we need to have a clear set of criteria for films to be included in this article. I'd say we should have a limit of films per year (I'd say eight) and sequels should be considered significant before inclusion (e.g. The Godfather Part II (won Academy Award for Best Picture) and Terminator 2 (for its groundbreaking effects) can be included, but not Iron Man 2 or Shrek 2). The last thing we need is a cluttered mess like List of unusual deaths once was.  -24.18.128.102 (talk) 13:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Until you have consensus STOP removing material from this article. You do not have consensus to delete information added by other editors...Modernist (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: More importantly, neither do YOU have consensus to keep all those films that were added there just today without consensus themselves. 24.18.128.102 (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

text: *Instead of deleting material and complaining add your proposal for a clear system; and let other editors weigh in...Modernist (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need a new system 

message: Everyone seeing this is invited to the sections on WP:FILM and MOS:FILM about the format change on 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 21:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to talk pages about the format of 2019 in film 

message: The only examples are English language films with the exception of a few Japanese films and I am not sure why there are no examples of movies from other places like Africa Mexico or China etc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.173.64.11 (talk) 08:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples are terrible