lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mock execution

message: It was reported that mock executions were used against Aussie swimmers training for the 2006 Commonwealth Games. Would inclusion of this incident in the article trivialise the other incidents? Andjam (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see any reason why that shouldn't be included.WackoJacko (talk) 01:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another instance of mock execution 

message: Is waterboarding a mock execution? The victim is made to believe he or she will drown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.149.30 (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterboarding 

message: The description of mock executions is word-for-word the same as the article for mock executions on HowStuffWorks.com (http://science.howstuffworks.com/five-forms-of-torture5.htm) Somebody should probably change it up or make it a bit more original. But thats just me. Commissar38  —Preceding undated comment added 16:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little similar? 

message: "In episode "Denial, Anger, Acceptance", Meadow Soprano and her choir sing the English version of the song, intercut with the mock execution of Christopher Moltisanti, and the real execution of Brendan Filone." English version of which song?
The quoted sentence could use some editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.234.180 (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mock execution song? 

message: In the part where article reads: "The Iranian hostages of 1979", the wording makes it sound as if the hostages were Iranians.
Maybe reword it
71.139.169.240 (talk) 19:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe reword it... 

message: The wrong James Foley is being linked to in the Historical Usage tab  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.146.33.94 (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong James Foley
Talk:NSP4 (rotavirus)

message: I can't see the point of adding the nomenclature from over 30 years ago. When Margaret Thouless  first identified it in 1979  she called it NS3. These abandoned designations will just confuse out readers. Graham Beards (talk) 10:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think this type of knowledge is too specialized for the intro, just put it in a history section. --SCIdude (talk) 09:27, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we need it anywhere; this is an encyclopaedia not a review article in a journal. Graham Beards (talk) 11:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older nomenclature
Talk:Marlboro Motor Raceway

message: This page is still in progress. Saves are incremental. Please do not delete. 
DeadWayt (talk) 04:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Current imagery, available at http://pgatlas.com, shows that the property is significantly overgrown. Property records, available at the same site, show that the land has been held by the same owner since 1999. TCav (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Property 

message: The Corvette Stingray made its debut at the Marlboro Motor Raceway on 18 April 1959http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corvette_Stingray_(concept_car)#Operational_history. TCav (talk) 20:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:NSP6 (rotavirus)

message: — Assignment last updated by Jparcoeur (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Bio 401 Cell Biology with lab F2022

message: I have added a lead section along with more up-to-date information throughout the page, the information added was collected from various articles to aid in more complete and current information. Carlistdon (talk) 23:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Made to Article 11/24/2022
Talk:King's High School, Dunedin

message: Reference #2 does not help validate the school roll AwkwardTrebuchet (talk) 08:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #2 

message: There are many citations missing, notably in the Co-Curricular section. AwkwardTrebuchet (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Newsletter

message: The February issue is now open for comment and news. If you have something you'd like to see in next month's newsletter, make yourself heard. JKBrooks85 (talk) 18:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2008 issue 

message: I'm working on the January issue now. Deadline's December 31 for news, so if you have a suggestion, make yourself heard. JKBrooks85 (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If its not too late for the January edition, it might be worthwhile noting that the article count for the WikiProject grew by nearly 1,000 from end of Nov to end of Dec. Link.↔NMajdan•talk 18:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been added. Fortunately, BrownBot hasn't sent out the newsletter yet, so it should show up in the delivery. JKBrooks85 (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2008 issue 

message: Since the month's already started, feel free to post comments about the December 2007 issue here, and things that you'd like to see next month down below. Thanks! JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  December 2007 issue 

message: I still seem to be receiving the newsletter despite having listed my name under "no delivery." -Elmer Clark (talk) 08:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No delivery" not working 

message: Might be worth adding the short to-do list to the newsletters.↔NMajdan•talk 14:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You got it. JKBrooks85 (talk) 22:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do list
Talk:Primer binding site

message: tRNA(Lys) is specific for HIV, not for all retrovirus. Also PBS is present in retrotransposons, and links many tRNAs. For example, Ty1 binds the tRNA(Met).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.144.43.179 (talk) 10:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prion pseudoknot

message: I do not know much about pseudoknot (and was searching for it)
But the text tells about mRNA pseudoknot, while the figure, while organized as a RNA pseudoknot presents amino-acid symbol. This is very strange and disturbing. Is this a joke, a plain error, or eventually the potential traduction of the mRNA sequence (this would be very unusual, and certainly very miss-leading) MA Delsuc (talk) 11:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: in addition, it has a different topology than the knot found in the 2 referred papers (Fig 1 in both) MA Delsuc (talk) 11:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure is badly wrong
Talk:Aisha Abd al-Rahman

message: Aisha is not the first modern woman to practice Qur'anic exegesis as she was chronologically preceded by the Persian poetess Táhirih who also practiced it. Daniel De Mol (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exegesis 

message: Aisha Abd al-Rahman she is considered as islamic character plz put image for her with hejab احمد هاني 1 (talk) 07:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove image
Talk:Pulse-chase analysis

message: Very ambiguous - reading this does not clarify what a pulse-chase analysis is.
What's the point of the 'chase'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.236.160.99 (talk) 10:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: @125.236.160.99 the definition is easy to understand but the purpose of this experiment type is not clarified. Hjaärten Irte (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RNAIII

message: References by Simonetti, et al.,Korem, et al, and Han et al, in the further reading section, contain controversial material that has been  shown not to be related to RNAIII or the agr system, despite the titles of the papers. Consequently,these references were remooved Ricardus Cibarius (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:International Federation of Competitive Eating

message: there is vandalism under the mustard belt section. it says william jennings bryan (historical figure) has the title and killed babe ruth or some b.s. like that. to whoever wrote it-what a fucking deusch!
-- Criticism --
The last line about criticism of IFOCE as not all competitors are allowed to compete is a bit cryptic - could someone explain a bit more about this. Who has complained? What basis is there for it? etc...
Many thanks,
a  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.66.49.133 (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:RNase MRP

message: I don't see much activity on this page, but I'm in favor of merging.  Bioguy137 (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose that RMRP be merged into RNase MRP. The RMRP briefly describes the human RNase MRP, while RNase MRP describes the more general gene, conserved across all Eukaryotes. Both discuss Cartilage–hair hypoplasia. Paul (talk) 01:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Gudmund Gudmundson

message: Guðmundsson and Gudmundson are not surnames. Icelanders don't have surnames. Guðmundur's father was Guðmundur and Guðmundsson is a proper patronymic. -- Evertype·✆ 20:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: When the person moved to the United States, "Gudmundson" would have "become" his surname, since in the U.S., people need surnames to function in society. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname
Talk:Damas Tower 2

message: Wouldn't it make more sense to create a Damas Towers Angsana Hotel & Suites page to cover both Damas Tower 2 and Angsana Hotel & Suites 1? They are both in the same complex and thus can and should be covered in one page. Rai-me 04:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this merger.  But according to Emporis the names of the towers and complex have changed.  The complex is now called "Angsana Hotel & Suites" and the buildings are now "Angsana Suites Tower" (the completed one; formerly Angsana Hotel & Suites 1 and before that Damas Tower 1) and "Angsana Hotel Tower" (the one that is nearing completion; formerly Damas Tower 2).  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 06:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the target merge page. Rai-me 21:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Log–log plot

message: I don't think the financial function applications described here are helpful.  They are not linked to the topic of log-log plots in the text, and cannot readily be linked since they are multivariate equations.  There are other wikis for regression analysis. I propose to delete them from here. Gierszep (talk) 03:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  financial functions 

message: Should be also added as an example?
--Yurichev (talk) 08:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bode plot]] is also log-log plot?
Talk:Leiper's Fork, Tennessee

message: If you check around, you will find that Nicole Kidman and her husband bought a farm that they are fixing up in Leipers Fork. Happened in the autumn of 2007. The locals here know about it, but it might take a bit of digging to get a verifiable source for this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.147.101 (talk) 01:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  famous landowners here
Talk:St. Patrick Catholic High School (Biloxi, Mississippi)

message: If it was founded as recently a 2007, how is its history rich?
Chasnor15 (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rich history

message: Anonymous editor  removed the "Controversy" section with this edit and a summary of "Most of this information is false and puts bad light in the school." The information that was removed is clearly cited by credible sources. Maybe they should look at the citations first before removing. I am encouraging discussion for the IP here instead of continuing to revert; that is the point of the BRD process. Eyesnore 14:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, the burden is plainly on  to provide a policy-based reason to remove the text. We don't remove material because it "shines a bad light" on the subject. The number of sources make it hard to believe the information is false. They'll need to give specific examples of how what's in the article doesn't agree with what's in the source, or give sources that contradict the ones we have now. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

text: As an uninvolved editor, I think the inclusion of the letter is a bit too far (probably also copyright infringing). Also, I do think  applies. This should probably be taken to the NPOV noticeboard. — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 18:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section
Portal talk:The Simpsons/Character quote

message: ;Quotes should be no longer than 4 lines, to keep uniformity among spacing in the rest of the portal.
;In order to maintain variety among the quotes displayed - 
#Try to avoid multiple quotes from the same character until other characters have quotes as well.
#Try to avoid multiple quotes from the same episode.
#Try to avoid overweighting multiple quotes from the same season.
Quotes so far include :
=== Character ===
*Abe - 2
*Agnus - 
*Apu - 2
*Barney - 1
*Bart - 2
*Carl - 1
*Chief Wiggum - 1
*Comic Book Guy - 1
*Dr. Nick - 2
*Edna Krabappel - 1
*Frank Grimes - 1
*Groundskeeper Willie - 3
*Hank Scorpio - 1
*Homer - 4
*Judge Roy - 1
*Kent Brockman - 2 
*Kang - 1
*Kodos - 1
*Krusty - 1
*Larry King - 1
*Lenny
*Lionel Hutz - 2
*Lisa - 1
*Maggie - 1
*Marge - 2
*Mayor Quimby - 1
*Moe - 1
*Mr. Burns - 2
*Ned - 2
*Professor Frink - 1
*Professor Frink, Sr. - 1
*Ralph - 1
*Richard Dean Anderson - 1
*Russ Cargill - 1
*Sideshow Bob - 1
*Skinner - 2
*Stephen Hawking - 1
*Troy McClure - 1
*Waylon Smithers - 1
*Wiseguy - 1
====Major characters we don't yet have quotes from====
*Cletus
*Dr. Hibbert
*Duffman
*Fat Tony
*Gil
*Hans Moleman
*Lovejoy
*Martin Prince
*Mayor Quimby
*Milhouse
*Nelson
*Otto
*Patty & Selma
*Rainier Wolfcastle
*Sea Captain
*Sideshow Mel
*Snake
And others -- Scorpion0422 19:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tally 

message: *Abe - 2
*Agnus - 
*Apu - 2
*Barney - 1
*Bart - 2
*Carl - 1
*Chief Wiggum - 1
*Comic Book Guy - 1
*Dr. Nick - 2
*Edna Krabappel - 1
*Frank Grimes - 1
*Groundskeeper Willie - 3
*Hank Scorpio - 1
*Homer - 4
*Judge Roy - 1
*Kent Brockman - 2 
*Kang - 1
*Kodos - 1
*Krusty - 1
*Larry King - 1
*Lenny
*Lionel Hutz - 2
*Lisa - 1
*Maggie - 1
*Marge - 2
*Mayor Quimby - 1
*Moe - 1
*Mr. Burns - 2
*Ned - 2
*Professor Frink - 1
*Professor Frink, Sr. - 1
*Ralph - 1
*Richard Dean Anderson - 1
*Russ Cargill - 1
*Sideshow Bob - 1
*Skinner - 2
*Stephen Hawking - 1
*Troy McClure - 1
*Waylon Smithers - 1
*Wiseguy - 1
====Major characters we don't yet have quotes from====
*Cletus
*Dr. Hibbert
*Duffman
*Fat Tony
*Gil
*Hans Moleman
*Lovejoy
*Martin Prince
*Mayor Quimby
*Milhouse
*Nelson
*Otto
*Patty & Selma
*Rainier Wolfcastle
*Sea Captain
*Sideshow Mel
*Snake
And others -- Scorpion0422 19:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character 

message: *Cletus
*Dr. Hibbert
*Duffman
*Fat Tony
*Gil
*Hans Moleman
*Lovejoy
*Martin Prince
*Mayor Quimby
*Milhouse
*Nelson
*Otto
*Patty & Selma
*Rainier Wolfcastle
*Sea Captain
*Sideshow Mel
*Snake
And others -- Scorpion0422 19:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Major characters we don't yet have quotes from

message: Nominations may be added and discussed here: 
Use this format: Quote, Character, Episode
;Nominations
#"You never know when an old calendar might come in handy! Sure it's not 1985 right now, but who knows what tomorrow will bring?", Homer Simpson, Bart Gets an Elephant --Simpsons fan 66 10:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominations
Talk:Retroviral psi packaging element

message: With reference to the merging- I dont think there is enough information at the moment to warrant four separate pages (one for each stem loop). All 4 pages refer to stem loops which together make up the packaging element. Seems sensible to have all on one page at present? Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure this is really necessary but trying to follow the rules...Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Longburn Adventist College

message: I think a section should be made to publicly identify that the lac website is such rubbish. So that people dont get the wrong idea from the website about the school. The website is far to outdated to be of any use.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Yacov (talk • contribs) 
:I've removed that section because it wasn't sourced. Please improve the article by adding only material from a reliable source, and don't add opinions.-gadfium 09:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lynfield College

message: Sir Prospect:
It would help if this article had more references and citations, currently, it only has one, and as a result, much of the article cannot be proven as fact beyond reasonable doubt. Perhaps referencing the Lynfield College Website? (www.lynfield.school.nz) Sir Prospect (talk) 02:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Macleans College

message: i've tryed to prune this article of its blatant school advertising.  others who can contribute constructively and within Wikipedia guidelines are urged to assist  Goldfinger820 (talk) 03:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: Seriously, do we need references to every single fact, when they are easily found on the school website anyways?!?! Still, I have replaced 2 of these to the exact pages for people who can't be bothered browsing.
Ronald Ping Man Chan (talk) 05:18, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Required

message: Fact
The particular New Zealand Maclean families in question where Cornish by birth, not Scottish.
Maclean is spelt with a small 'l' and not a capital 'L'.
The New Zealand Macleans where 3 of 4 brothers born (John 1811, Robert 1813, Benjamin 1815 and Thomas Every 1819) to Robert Lean and his wife Elizabeth nee Every, who farmed an estate known as Trehudreth, Blisland, Cornwall. The 4th brother, John, stayed in Cornwall, and was knighted for public service as an auditor. He was a well known Cornish historian, ie Sir John Maclean.
These 4 brothers claimed Scottish forebears and changed their surname from Lean to Maclean in 1845. There is no creditable evidence that the claimed Scottish connection was fact. In fact the brothers can be traced through Parish records to a marriage between a Henry Lean and Margery Southerum in St Breward Parish 1609. The 4 brothers were 7th generation from that marriage. I am 10th generation. My great grandfather was Benjamin Maclean (1815 to 1883).
I have 3 sons and a grandson who is a 12th generation Lean/Maclean.
`  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 10th Generation Lean (talk • contribs) 03:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact and Fiction
Talk:Meteor Vineyard

message: While there is a possibility given Coombsville growing reputation and Schuler's financial resources that the Meteor vineyards will become very well known. That is not really the case right now. However, Dyer Vineyards does have a fear amount of independent coverage and there is a lot of intrigue and anticipation about their Meteor Vineyards label that it may be best to refashion this article as Dyer Vineyard and include a blurb about the Meteor Vineyard label and the vineyard it from. AgneCheese/Wine 05:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This should probably be about [[Dyer Vineyard]]

message: I added a Prod tag as, in my opinion, the article is not notable, as per WP:N.--BodegasAmbite (talk) 20:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you review the article, and do a little searching, the subject seems to pass the formal WP:N criterion - significant mentions in reliable sources.  However, it is one of the less notable vineyards / winemakers in the region and if you chose even to double or quadruple Wikipedia's coverage of wine it is not on the list of wineries I would think deserve an article.  Small, new, or relatively unknown vineyards can certainly be notable or a number of reasons, but this one is all three and other than having a famous owner and making decent (apparently) wine does not seem to stand out in any way.  Under the circumstances I suggest merging any useful material and sources to the article about its owner, who certainly is notable.  They just released their first wine a year ago, so if production expands and it wins acclaim it might become notable later - at that time, if there is a sufficient showing, the article can be recreated with additional information and sources.  Unless there is opposition, I suggest just merging and creating a redirect - no administrator or process is really necessary.  Wikidemon (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Took care of it. The important thing to keep in mind when doing a Merge is to leave an attribution note on the talk page of the new location (such as what I did on Talk:Barry Schuler so as to preserve the GFDL history. AgneCheese/Wine 06:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Gene targeting

message: Hi there, I'm planning on improving and expanding this article, but this will probably require a complete rewrite. I'm going to integrate all the information already included. Also I'm planning on removing the Nobel prize section, rather mentioning this elsewhere, I hope no one objects. BioStu (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cindyhong123 (talk) 12:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU22 - Sect 202 - Tue

message: I am a Post Graduate researcher at the University of Leeds working in the area of Gene Targeting. I've identified some areas for improvement with the lead for this article; 
1. "The method can be used to delete a gene, remove exons" --> I am not aware of Gene targeting being used to remove DNA and can't see how this is possible through Homology directed repair(?). If no one has any objections I'd like to remove this.
2. "Gene targeting can be permanent or conditional" - I am not clear what this means. What does 'conditional' mean in this context? 
3. "Conditions can be a specific time during development / life of the organism or limitation to a specific tissue, for example" - again it's not clear what this means. Is this referring to inducible GT?
4. "Gene targeting requires the creation of a specific vector for each gene of interest. However, it can be used for any gene, regardless of transcriptional activity or gene size" - this means very little out of context. I propose moving this point later in the article where it can be fully explained.
In general the lead is supposed to be understandable by a general audience, however the current lead is very technical and therefore not accessible. As such I would like to write a new lead that is more accessible. Yorkrosa (talk) 11:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for setting out these issues, . To me as a lay person, the current lead does have a problem of readability (which applies to a lot of Wikipedia articles on technical subjects). There are wikilinks for some technical terms, but that doesn't excuse the article from having to be written in a way that someone new to the topic isn't put off by the first few sentences. To learn that there are also some issues with the accuracy, and there are statements which don't make sense for an expert, suggests that the lead would benefit from a substantial rewrite. I encourage you to be bold in making changes and look forward to what improvements you'll make. MartinPoulter (talk) 13:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks very much @MartinPoulter! 194.80.232.19 (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edits