Talk:WYFX-LD

message: The reason I applied this is because there is an already better article at WYFX and I plan to move it to this page once it gets deleted. --CFIF (talk to me) 12:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been properly moved, apparently. --CFIF (talk to me) 22:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Deletion tag 

message: :Image:Fox1762.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fox1762.gif

message: Hey folks, since NVT has successfully been able to do to WYFX what previous owner Piedmont didn't do by broadcasting WYFX in HD full-power on WKBN's second digital subchannel, should we move the page to WKBN-DT2?
Arguments in favor:
* WYFX & WFXI call signs now used strictly for FCC-mandated station identification (in addition to WKBN-TV, since it is simulcast on 27.2), as well as EPG for over-the-air and cable broadcasts. WYFX calls not used for marketing anymore.
* While WFXI in Mercer remains on the air in analog on channel 17, the main WYFX signal was forced to sign off on analog on June 12th due to channel 62 needing freed up. It has not re-signed on in digital.
* Permanent subchannel? In all honesty, WYFX is much better off as a subchannel of WKBN as far as over-the-air is concerned. Plus, since WKBN was able to get both its main signal and the simulcast of WYFX to broadcast in HD full-time (only eight other stations nationally are airing two subchannels in HD full-time on the same signal), there would be no need to keep WYFX & WFXI's licenses.
Arguments against:
* Still official call sign, and still officially licensed with the FCC.
* NVT has made NO announcement that they will permanently shut off WYFX & WFXI, forfeit those two licenses back to the FCC, and keep WYFX as a subchannel of WKBN.
* WFXI is still on-the-air on channel 17 in analog in addition to WYFX airing on WKBN-DT2.
Let me know your thoughts. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 11:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to WKBN-DT2? 

message: Fox 17/62 was once Fox 31/62.  I believe it moved to 17 not too long after their sign-on in the late 90's.  I can't find anything on the Internet relating to this move.  If anyone can dig up any information on the Fox 31/62 incarnation, it would be neat to have it included in the article.
Joski1624 (talk) 08:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WFXI-CA previously on Channel 31 

message: I could always receive all channels 19 unless there was stormy weather. Now I can’t tune them in at all. I don’t know what happened.🙁 Kimscotchir (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channels 19