Talk:Agumon

message: can somebody add the relevant informations for the Movies and CD dramas in this article? Circeus 20:45, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header 

message: While that was never clearly explained, as to how Tai arrived, it is apparent that without the aid of one of the newer digidestined it was possible to enter the digital world.(Otherwise Mimi would be unable to, as she does shortly before Palmon was attacked by one of the Digimon created by Arukenimon). If I'm right, the only requirements to enter the digital world is that the gate is open, a ask tha can be acomplished by a D3, but can also occur naturally.
*Yeah, it never said in the show that you can't enter the digital world with a normal digivice, just that only the D3's can open the gate. --Cyber95 10:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on Tai's Coming to the Digital World (Presumably refering to the first episode of season two) 

message: why does BlackAgumon redirect here? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.160.15.240 (talk • contribs) .
:Because he's a minor variant of Agumon who's not significant enough to warrant his own article? See WP:FICT. -- Ned Scott 23:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well, he is prominent in digimon rumble arena —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PopiethePopester (talk • contribs) .
===Different Name Origin? ====
http://www.thedigiport.com/dex_Agumon_Savers.shtml
That site says that Agumon's name comes from "aguagu," a biting onomatopoeia. Does anyone know if this is correct and not "agurabana?" Indiawilliams 05:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect? 

message: http://www.thedigiport.com/dex_Agumon_Savers.shtml
That site says that Agumon's name comes from "aguagu," a biting onomatopoeia. Does anyone know if this is correct and not "agurabana?" Indiawilliams 05:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Different Name Origin? =

message: I spent hours trying to expand/source this article a few months ago...and now that text needs to be cut IMO. Why does this article need all the plot summary in the Description and Other Forms section? Looks to me that it should either go to Digimon Adventure and Adventure 02 or be deleted outright. Indiawilliams 01:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, all the Digimon articles need less plot summary. -- Ned Scott 08:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind a brief description under all the "Other Forms" section about how each digivolution came about, the circumstances, and any significant things that digivolution form did. But the Description section defintely could use a cut. --`/aksha 10:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I nuked the Description section, and I think the article's a LOT more succint for it. Indiawilliams 03:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: uhh...i don't think it's such a good idea to just nuke the section. The description section serves for agumon as the later == sections serve for all of agumon's other forms. And i'd assumed "appearance" and "description" where standard sections (carried over form the old digimon layout). Anyway, i'm going to restore the description section with a much smaller description and leave it as. --`/aksha 09:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...Well alright then. Now the Desciption's something I can deal with. One thing; is it necessary to mention that Agumon fought BlackWarGreymon in 02, since that battle did not progress the story in any way? I think mentioning that he was in the series but not a main character is enough. Indiawilliams 02:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, i thought it was fairly important. Agumon did only two important things in 02 - one was being captured by Ken, the other was fighting blackwargreymon. Although i won't say it's *vital* for us to mention it. If you want to shorten the 02 section further, i'm not going to stop you. --`/aksha 07:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraneous Text 

message: Is there any categorical (in-episode) proof that Botamon is this Agumon's Fresh? Indiawilliams 19:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. I think it's either an extrapolation from Agumon (Adventure)'s Digivolution line, or from a V-pet toy. If it's from one of the v-pet toys, i'd say we don't include it, as per this discussion. --`/aksha 04:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The V-Pets keep the "official" lines, and in any case, Baby II digimon have always had the same Baby I form. Koromon has always come from Botamon, and in the v-pets, he still does, and ONLY does. So I don't see where the uncertainty comes from. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.211.181.173 (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Savers Agumon

message: I added in an Other Forms section for some of the other Agumons so people would know about them (I added in the link to them), and had some info on BlackAgumon. Hope it was a good idea... Leosj 00:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry it wasn't, this article is about Agumon the character from Digimon Adventure, SnowAgumon, ClearAgumon, ToyAgumon, ShadowToyAgumon and BlackAgumon can have their own entries in List of Rookie Digimon (Part 1). There's also happens to be bunch of other variations that there's really nothing to say about like Agumon Hakaze, DotAgumon, ExtraAgumon, etc. Nightmare SE 01:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Forms

message: It's says BlackWarGreymon's death and noble sacrifice hit him hard what does that mean? 76.112.23.57 06:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WarGreymon and BlackWarGreymon 

message: Why does a single digimon merit it's own article, but all the pokemon are merged into big lists?  Seems inconsistent. Either merge all the digimon or give each pokemon it's own article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.72.239 (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not all Digimon actually have their own article. A lot of them were merged into a generic "minor characters of season #", which is kind of like how the Pokémon articles are set up now. Only the main Digimon of each season have their own articles, and even then, they share it with each of their evolutions. A lot of other series give the main characters their own article. Using a Pokémon example, I believe Pikachu also has it's own article (I think it's the only one, though. Which somewhat makes sense, since most other Pokémon don't get the same light shined on them as Pikachu does).Gagbumon (talk) 03:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that it matters, Bulbapedia >>>>>>>> Wikipedia even when the Pokemon did have their own decent pictures. --Kurtle (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it seems like so many people have forgotten this, I'll remind you all that Digimon was originally a Tamagotchi-type toy (from the makers of Tamagotchi, no less). The animated series didn't come around until about a year or two later. Agumon was one of the Digimon in the original toy. Just thought I'd point that out, since the article doesn't seem to mention it at all. And I agree, delete this article. 71.125.148.83 (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wait a minute...

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Koromon.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Botamon.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Greymon.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Metalgreymon.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Wargreymon.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Agumon01.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:SkullGreymon.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: This appears to focus on Agumon as a character in adventure rather than the actual species.Muur (talk) 08:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: and did you even have permission to move it back from a redirect?Muur (talk) 08:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

text: one problem is, you claim that Kakudo created Agumon but that's just outright bullshit. Agumon was created in 1997 by Kenji Watanabe. here for example is where he states the first two digimon he created (as hes created a good 95% of the 1500 digimon that exist) were agumon and tyrannomon. "Interviewer: Please tell us about the very first Digimon you drew. Watanabe: That would be Tyranomon and Agumon. Since our initial idea was to be able to take ‘dinosaurs’ for a stroll, I used that idea as a base to design these two." theres the *real* reason/inspiration behind its design, created for the Digital Monster (virtual pet). and agumon as a species kinda has a shit tonne of evolutions. wikimon, a website that focuses on digimon species and everything they can evolve to, shows agumon can evolve to a good few hundred digimon monsters. literally the entire problem with this article is you name it "Agumon" but only talk about the character from Digimon Adventure. there are agumons in hundrdres of digimon products that have nothing to do with digimon adventure, and agumon didnt even debut in the anime, it was in three mangas, two video games, and multiple vpets before the anime started.Muur (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If you find issues to be solved then be bold. Also, remember to be civil cause I found the response disturbing. This is not a forum.Tintor2 (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: made some changes so it's more in line with how it's supposed to be in regards to agumon across the entire digimon IP. Muur (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Please remember to be WP:CIVIL to other users and assume good faith. If there is information that is missing, feel free to add it yourself. However, the sources you specified are not reliable, so you need to find the original interviews and documents that these websites are sourcing. lullabying (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Page