lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Steam quality

message: Superheated steam, I believe is steam above the saturation temperature at a given pressure.  Superheated steam by definition would have a quality of 1.
See 
Therefore since steam quality pertains to saturated steam, then I believe that quality can defined as the mass fraction of water in the vapour phase divided by the total (ie liquid + vapour) MarDel 18:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam Quality Meaning of  "Superheated" 

message: Steam quality is not the same as vapour quality.
Steam quality is the ratio of steam mass flow (kg/s) and total mass flow (kg/s), whereas vapour quality, or better yet vapour fraction, is the ratio of steam mass (kg) and total mass (kg).
The term vapour fraction is used by the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, see , and is directly obtained from the equation-of-state.
The article on slip ratio points to this page and is erroneously redirected to the article Vapour Quality. Steam quality and slip ratio are related through void fraction.
Hummeling (talk) 08:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Redirect to Vapour Quality
Talk:Ashley Cotton

message: *'Who shot Phil?' bookies odds -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Is there a reason to create this article? It is full of fiction and empty of reality. Do people and critics see this fictional character as a "like father, like son" figure? What is the significant impact from this character? --George Ho (talk) 02:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article exist without balance?
Talk:Doom clone

message: Uhh, why on Earth was this article deleted? Fredrik Johansson 20:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it was deleted after a prod  -- cmhTC 21:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

message: What's the source of the graph used on the page? If it's not from a reliable source then it's original research and should be removed. ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 16:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Research?

message: I've have added some additonal Doom clones for the 32 bit amiga cd32, which are relavent for this article, so I thought I would just put this edit down on the talk page, just to inform ya all, and my info is valid, so please DO NOT delete it. Thankyou, mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 12:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gloom was already listed under the subsection for clones that don't use the Doom engine. I added a proper link for Fears, which does not yet have an article.--Drat (Talk)
There are many more Doom clones on the Amiga: Death Mask, Testament, Nemac IV, Gloom 3, Breathless, Behind the Iron Gate, Citadel, Trapped, Trapped 2, Genetic Species, etc. I suggest a subsection for all of these? Christopedia (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Doom clones, additonal
Talk:Hugh Royer Jr.

message: Need help from my fellow Wikipedians (Tewapack, Dakpowers or Osomec most likely) with the following:
*The year that Royer won the St. Charles Open. It was some time between 1959 and 1969.
*The years that he won the Georgia PGA (2), Georgia Open (1) and Georgia Senior Open (1). Thanks.--Hokeman 20:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christine Hewitt

message: Christine Hewitt was also a Jamaican entertainer who 
died on June 29, 2006. Apparently she was attacked, shot, and put back in the minivan she was riding in, which was then set on fire.
Hieronymus Illinensis 08:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of that, if a page is created for the other Christine Hewitt, can that use disambiguation in the title, and a dablink be added to the top of this article? It would save a fair bit of work. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed
Talk:Esther Martinez

message: <textdump of http://voices.cla.umn.edu/vg/Bios/entries/martinez_esther.html removed>
We cannot carry someone else's copyrighted material in the article. We cannot carry it on the Talk page. Do you understand what Copyright means? Fan-1967 21:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:IBM 407

message: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/tabulator.html lists
 	IBM 407 Accounting Machine 	High-speed alphanumeric. 421, 444, 447 variations. 
Wikipedia doesn't need an article for each. 69.106.238.83 (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge IBM 421 

message: I put this comment on the talk page for the picture. Posting it here in hopes of more (any) response:
The picture shows the control panel (patch panel) gate in the "open" position, where it would be just prior to removing the panel. In this position the plugs on the control panel will not make contact with the receptacles in the machine and so the machine will not function. Yet the operator is inspecting the printed output and has a finger near the button panel, as if ready to stop the machine. How does this make sense? Jeh (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture shows machine in an inoperative state
Talk:Noriko Nagai

message: There is an actual seiyu who uses the stage name Noriko Nagai who voiced one of the two main characters in Miracle Girls. She is unrelated to the more prolific Noriko Hidaka whose real name is Noriko Nagai...Ranma9617 21:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She doesn't even have a page on the Japanese Wikipedia, and she doesn't have one here, either, which makes it unlikely she is notable enough for inclusion. Until she does, this should remain as a redirect. I have changed it back. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this was converted to a disambiguation page
Talk:Debbie Bates

message: Ap, any idea what's up with these ref formatting? I can get them to look normal.GunGagdinMoan 01:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to sleep :-) you put [[The Mirror without closing the link. (it's Daily Mirror, btw) –anemoneprojectors– 01:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs
Talk:Radar Absorbent Material

message: The iron ball paint article is so short that it can easily be merged into this article. Any objections? -Amatulic 21:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged both iron ball paint here as no objections were noted. I have also merged the orphan article Jauman layer into this article. -Amatulic 17:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[iron ball paint]] here
Talk:Derek Branning

message: Foreman was on This Morning today, it was an excellent interview with details on casting and characterisation. I took notes but if anyone can find the interview, feel free to update, as I don't think I caught everything. –anemoneprojectors– 15:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Morning 

message: *'This new Derek has the face of a dyspeptic pug and the charm of an abandoned Threshers. Within seconds of his arrival the bastard was crashing through the Square like a herniated tank, spraying wide-boy aphorisms everywhere, insulting Pat's earrings, calling Michael Moon's handshake "a bit mincey" and banging on about his time "inside" and ow fings ain't wot they used to be wot wiv the lack of "respect" and the current proliferation of "Liffooanians".' 
: GSorby – Ping 11:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: GSorby – Ping 23:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I'm confused, what did this edit do? What did tea lady mean too? - Rain the 1 23:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha, tea lady is short-hand for an edit summary I left Mario when we worked together on Poppy - just meaning that quotes from unnamed "insiders" are best avoided, as they could be from anyone, right down to the canteen tea lady. Frickative 23:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes Mario does have a habit of copying :| GSorby – Ping 23:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I get what you mean. I was trying to find a reference to a tea lady in the text. lolRain the 1 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  GSorby's comment aside; when Frickative said that, I just knew it was a great quote to use. :P MayhemMario 16:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could be tea lady 

message: How do we know he is lying about Chrissie? 74.97.32.27 (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2012 
:This spoiler at Digital Spy reads:  GSorby – Ping 22:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am wondering if we should list Chrissy at all in the 2012 list as it's probably not even her name. –anemoneprojectors– 15:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrissie 

message: The word is only mentioned in the reception section, so context needs to be added. I can assume what it means, but I could be assuming wrong. –anemoneprojectors– 13:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have only just seen this and what is the point. In the rejuvenation section it mentions that naughty Derek will develop a soft side - that is a transition. You could have just added the context instead of nitpicking.Rain the 1 21:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It does, but it should be clear that it also refers to a section above. I may not have had time to add the context before, but I just tried it now and I can't figure out the right wording so some help would be appreciated. –anemoneprojectors– 13:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "transition"
Talk:Derek Harkinson

message: This is another character that I feel doesnt warrant their own page. Anyone agree it should be merged with List of EastEnders characters (2001)? Bleaney (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Bounded set (topological vector space)

message: I'm moving some discussion from Talk:Bounded set to here since it clearly concerns only LCTVS. — MFH:Talk 21:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the statement around "seminorms" is incorrect.
If not, a proof or a link to a proof (at least a precise reference: Thm.X of book Y) is needed.
At least, p(S) should be defined. (a priori, for a map f:E→G, f(S)={ f(x); x∈S }; most probably, here the sup is meant.)
In the context of inductive limits, there is the notion of "regular limit" (bounded set = set contained in some space and bounded there), it seems to me that this would not make sense if the property holds.
The same (need for reference) applies to the statement "bounded lin. op. is continuous".
(How about adding a subpage ".../proofs" to all articles in mathematics?)
— MFH: Talk 16:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Locally convex (which you inserted) and the sup was missing, but now the statement about boundedness in terms of seminorms should be correct. I will try to get a proof or reference untill tomorrow. MathMartin 17:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a reference in the english translation of Bourbakis "Topological Vector Spaces". The statement is in the middle of chapter III page 2 (TVS III.2) MathMartin 20:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  seminorms ? 

message: This example is not true (at least) in the following case.
In a discrete topology, the only bounded set is {0}, because the open set {0} cannot be inflated at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo-J-N-Jian (talk • contribs) 05:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In the locally convex case, the statement is true again, which easily results from the fact that the origin has a local base of absorbent sets. I edited the example to elaborate on that. LMias (talk) 08:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

text: Actually, every topological vector space has a local base of absorbent sets around the origin, and this is the setting in which this article is written. The problem is that the example with the discrete topology is not a topological vector space. LMias (talk) 16:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Every finite set of points is bounded?
Talk:Epsilon radiation

message: Well Slartibarfast1992, I constantly attempt to post certain things but for some reason Xihr keeps deleting my posts. All of which is true, as I have looked it up and are willing to share it. But for some reason I do not think that Xihr wants me to post but I shall be constant now. Infinity Warrior   —Preceding undated comment added 01:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the entry.  It's tertiary radiation, which means it's composed of electrons knocked out of nuclei atoms. Xihr 23:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, that was a thinko.  I meant atoms, not nuclei.  Delta radiation is just these electrons being knocked out of atoms by other radiation.  Epsilon radiation is electrons being knocked out of atoms by delta radiation. Xihr 22:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The original radiation does not have to be beta radiation.  All ionizing radiation knocks electrons out of atoms, which includes alpha radiation, gamma radiation, as well as cosmic rays (mostly protons) and neutrons of different energies.  Beta, delta, and epsilon radiation are all composed of electrons, nothing more. The distinction between them is whether they're primary (beta), secondary (delta), or tertiary (epsilon) forms of radiation. Xihr 04:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: They're free electrons, so no, they aren't different.  They would have a distribution of energies dependent on the energy distribution of the primary (for delta) or secondary (for epsilon) radiation.  Delta and epsilon radiation are just designations of how the radiation was created.  Keep in mind these radiations were discovered and classified before there was any coherent theory of the atom in place, much less its constituent particles, so when discovered, it wasn't known whether delta and epsilon radiation were qualitatively different from the other types of radiation. Xihr 01:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: There is elegance in simplicity. Xihr 02:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF?
Talk:Fragmentation (computing)

message: I have just gone through the article and i was really wondering how would if i insert a setion 
about compaction (it removes external fragmentation by moving all allocated blocks to one end and free blocks to other) below the external fragmentation? 
I mean when you disscuss the issue of external fragmentation you should write about how it can be removed.  Prashantgonarkar (talk) 03:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: compaction

message: I have just read through this article and was wondering whether file fragmentation is actually a "phenonemon" or is there a reasonable explanation for why it occurs?
83.104.81.241 (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'Data fragmentation' section tries to explain it. See the File system fragmentation article if that was unclear. -- intgr [talk] 17:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms Used 

message: “It (external fragmentation) is a weakness of certain storage allocation algorithms, when they fail to order memory used by programs efficiently” – surely it is a weakness of all general purpose algorithms, and any that fails to adequately anticipate sequence of (de)allocation operations? If so, this should be changed – or am I missing something? PJTraill (talk) 10:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: One approach to avoid external fragmentation is to move surviving objects such that they are stored contiguously in memory. This is possible only for programming languages where each pointer is well-defined and where all pointers can found. Then this could be done using a garbage collector that is free to move objects. Alternatively, you can work with allocations of fixed memory units where objects are not necessarily stored contiguously in memory (see ). This, however, requires compiler support. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External fragmentation a weakness of “certain” algorithms? 

message: File slack and slack space both redirect to Fragmentation (computing)#Internal fragmentation, but these terms do not appear anywhere in the target article. – Tea2min (talk) 08:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'File slack' and 'slack space' 

message: I didn't want to attempt major surgery to this article, but there already is an article File system fragmentation that talks about problems with external storage. I would suggest that this article concentrate on main storage fragmentation and eliminate (or merge) the material on file system frag. Peter Flass (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  File system fragmentation
Talk:List of people from Alaska

message: Not born in Alaska, his bio has no mention of Alaska.  Does he belong here? Dleit Ḵaa (talk) 05:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I was prevented from having more time to finish things.  You know, the liking to eat part and all that.  Here's some informal criteria for inclusion.
* The link on the list should be to a biography page on the person, not a list entry, redlink or anything else like that.
* The person should be someone who is known outside of Alaska, but at the same time, should be known for having been born in or lived in Alaska.  Careful consideration should also be given to not have the list be dominated by modern-day persons of dubious celebrity.
There are other things, but I'm not keeping a train of thought right now.  I'll get back to this when I can.RadioKAOS (talk) 08:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Robert Symonds
Talk:Scott M. Rodell

message: Hello Admins,
I believe this article is legitimate and should not be deleted for the following reasons:
--Rodell's reputation as a martial artist and author are comparable to the following pages, neither of which are contested:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Lowry_%28martial_arts%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Cartmell
His book on Chinese swordsmanship is consistently a top-seller in that category on Amazon.com.
--Rodell heads an international organization, Great River Daoist Center, which likely has a similar scope to the organizations on the following unconstested pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joko_Ninomiya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Cheung
Thank you for your time,
gwolfson
=== Bad Picture Caption ===
"Rodell disarming an opponent using an upward beat."  Looking at the full size version of the picture, it's clear that the opponent has not weapon at all.  It should say "Rodell taking a whack at an unarmed person with a wooden sword."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.229.196 (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Rodell disarming an opponent using an upward beat."  Looking at the full size version of the picture, it's clear that the opponent has not weapon at all.  It should say "Rodell taking a whack at an unarmed person with a wooden sword."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.229.196 (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Picture Caption
Talk:Kevin Kolb

message: I've cleaned it up a bit.  Definitely shouldn't be deleted.
I've added some more information on the 2006 season.
Considering that Kevin Kolb is a relatively high profile American college football player who will almost certainly be drafted in the 2007 NFL Draft, perhaps in the first three rounds, this article should not be deleted. Blwarren713 18:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 4.48 40? 39 on bench, 47 on Wonderlic?
NFLcombineresults.com shows him running a 4.89 at the combine, and not participating in the bench or wonderlic. 2600:387:C:6F12:0:0:0:B (talk) 20:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are these Combine scores coming from?
Talk:Mr. Jolly Lives Next Door

message: >It features Rik Mayall and Adrian Edmondson as Richie and Eddie
Throughout the film the two characters are never referred to as Richie and Eddie and in the credits are listed as "Dreamytime Escort" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095664/ 
 unsigned - from creation log would assume 82.10.97.230 (talk) 23:02, 12 October 2006(UTC)
:Agreed.  I have removed references to names.  Robsinden (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Names 
Talk:D4 (programming language)

message: Well, it seems to be and advertisement of D4 over SQL. It lacks: source of those or arguments or both. countryhacker 22:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Links at the bottom of the page are broken - Looks like Dataphor website has been replaced with a holding page pending further announcement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.101.82 (talk) 14:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Markov blanket

message: I would like to suggest that "children's parents" be replaced by the term "co-parents".
I think that this is technically more accurate since the term "co-parents" excludes the concerned node A
that we wish to separate from the graph while "children's parents" involves also A.
Secondly, it is a single word and perhaps easier to remember and helps visualise the relationship of node A
with the concerned nodes. Gugux (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Tennenrishin (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree with this suggestion, but is it already used in the litterature? LaurentPerrinet (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-parents 

message: I changed \Pr(A \mid \partial A \cap B) = \Pr(A \mid \partial A)  to \Pr(A \mid \partial A , B) = \Pr(A \mid \partial A)  because the  \cap  sign means intersection, and the intersection \partial A \cap B  only includes the node  B . Instead we want the union of \partial A and  B , which would be \partial A \cup B, but I believe the comma is more standard notation. Sunbeam44 (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conditional Independence 

message: "In statistics and machine learning, when one wants to infer a random variable with a set of variables, usually a subset is enough, and other variables are useless."--209.204.41.233 (talk) 13:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infer "with"? Is "infer" technical jargon in opening sentence? If not it should be "from" (infer from) and not "with". If so, please link "infer" to a relevant article.
Talk:Brass ring

message: Is there any relationship between this tradition and the story The Bronze Ring from the Blue Fairy Book?
Uriel-238 05:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brass vs. Bronze

message: The brass ring as a term also means striving for the highest prize, or living life to the fullest. It is not clear when the phrase came into wide use but has been found in dictionaries as far back as the late 1800s.From :
:Merriam-Webster's 10th Collegiate defines the metaphor and dates it to 1950. Christine Ammer's The American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms says it's from the late 1800s.
This needs to re-sourced as the current link is gone. FloNight 18:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lost link to source

message: I had always heard the brass ring thing went back to the days of the medieval knights when grabbing the ring was part of a horse-mounted skills contest.  Anyone else?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.154.137.244 (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Knights

message: I think this carousel should be mentioned: A Carousel for Missoula
72.21.198.66 (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Carousel for Missoula?  

message: Does this belong in in category Rings (jewellery)?--Klausok (talk) 14:47, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the rings are not intended to be worn. They are a type of token to be turned in for a prize. LadyOriona (talk) 20:37, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewellery? 

message: A new category has been added for "modern" ring carousels. Please add to the list. LadyOriona (talk) 20:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Ring Carousels?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Katieh5584

message: Username	katieh5584
Total edits	1616
Distinct pages edited	1380
Average edits/page	1.171
First edit	21:26, 6 November 2005
	
(main)	1090
Talk	4
User	26
User talk	475
Image	1
Category	1
Wikipedia	18
Portal	1
katieh5584's editcount summary stats as of 22:23 October 12 2006, using Interiot's tool. (aeropagitica) 22:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)