lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boeing 727

message: I think we should change the main picture from a -200 variant to the -100 to give new readers a intro to the -100 then progress up to the -200. Lol78231469 (talk) 02:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: But the -200 is way more common, with % against  %. Also, please read the last discussion on the subject, a good deal of thought and work has been poured in the current one. And if you want another picture, please propose one. Thanks!--Marc Lacoste (talk) 04:27, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the Main Picture 

message: I would like to add some random pop-culture information to the article but it seems the lead is not the right place to place it. It also seems that there is no "In Media" section but (Witch makes sense given there is not much media around this plane.) and I am Strongly against adding a whole new section to the article. Does anyone know where I can add some random Pop-Culture information?
PS:I have citations/sources ready if the edit is ever made. Liminality10101 (talk) 23:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead section is indeed inappropriate. You can try adding a new "in media" section, but if the tidbits are unimportant (refs or not) it can be deleted.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The DB Cooper incident is already covered in the linked List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 727 and is not particularly significant from the point of view of the history of the boeing 727 - the album cover is pure trivia.Nigel Ish (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Info 

message: The article states: "The 727-46 was a shortened variant of the 727." I do not think this is correct. The 727-46 looks identical in dimensions to the 727-100. The 727-46 does have additional rear exits similar to the 727-200. This was to satisfy the high-density requirements of Japan Airlines (Boeing customer code "46"). Some of these were sold to Dan-Air, where they were fitted with 153 seats, more than the exit limit of the standard 727-100.
https://www.key.aero/article/dan-airs-trijet-boeings Meh130 (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Entry removed as it was unsourced. Accident reports involving the -46 report 140+ passenger casualties and aircraft weights the same as the -100. Limited searches of Jane's directories came up blank for the -46 being a major variant or even being mentioned. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boeing 727-46
Template talk:Hiero/pd/bordercolour

message: What is this template?
* This template is part of a range of templates used to render Egyptian hieroglyphs in Wikipedia.
* Specifically, this template encodes the border colour of templates  when called by the parameter .
* This is designed to be used for the Protodynastic Period of Egypt.
::Gareth Hughes 16:18, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Template talk:Hiero/ed/bordercolour

message: What is this template?
* This template is part of a range of templates used to render Egyptian hieroglyphs in Wikipedia.
* Specifically, this template encodes the background colour of templates  when called by the parameter .
* This is designed to be used for the Early Dynastic Period of Egypt.
::Gareth Hughes 16:25, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pan Am Systems

message: The reports that indicate that CSX is purchasing Pan Am Railways from Pan Am Systems is not accurate. CSX is purchasing all of Pan Am Systems, here’s what it says on the STB revised report:
“Specifically, Systems would be merged with 747 Merger Sub 1, Inc., with Systems surviving. Immediately thereafter, Systems would be merged with 747 Merger Sub 2, with
747 Merger Sub 2 surviving and the separate corporate existence of Systems ceasing. 747 Merger Sub 2, as the surviving corporation, would be renamed Pan Am Systems, Inc., and would be a wholly owned subsidiary of CSXC. Concurrent with closing, CSXC would contribute Pan Am Systems, Inc., and all of its subsidiaries to CSXT. CSXT would thereafter control the rail carrier subsidiaries of Pan Am Systems, Inc., and at a future time yet to be determined, would merge those subsidiaries, except V&M, into CSXT.”
So CSX is purchasing Pan Am Systems and replaced it with a short lived new Pan Am Systems instead of just purchasing Pan Am Railways. Here’s the report I’m talking about- https://www.progressiverailroading.com/resources/editorial/2022/50875.pdf
Granthew (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pan Am Systems and CSX
Talk:Henry de Monfreid

message: "Secrets of the Red Sea", well-made, from around 1985  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcin862 (talk • contribs) 10:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: There was a TV series
Talk:Peasant

message: The main difference between a Slave and Peasant is Freedom
A peasant is given Freedom to:
* Pay Taxes to the governing Elites
* Be responsible for his living expenses (pay rent, buy food)
* Die in wars when the Elites of his nation are involved in a conflict
* Respect the borders drawn by the agreement of the world governing Elites
* Be proud of his flag, language, religion, culture & superiority to other peasants.  Freedumbest (talk) 00:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguishing Peasant from Slave 

message: In the Philippines the Term Peasant (Saop) were named to Friendies by a Land Owner from Negrense Annabelle Bohol Apustadero. 222.127.97.102 (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peasants to Friendies (Social Position) 

message: "In Latin America, the term "peasant" is translated to "Campesino" (from campo—country person)"
Forgets to account for Brazil, Haiti and other Latin American nations where spanish isn't widely spoken. Would be better to change "Latin" to "Hispanic" or just completely remove that sentece. Campo means field, not country person. JamesSolterre (talk) 04:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the "Latin America" section 

message: The spanish wikipedia equivalent for the english page "Peasant" is titled "Campesino", but from what i understand those do not mean exactly the same thing. This difference in meanings becomes apparent when comparing the contents of the two pages, as the english "Peasant" page talks about them in reference to mediaval times and the system of feudalism, meanwhile the spanish "Campesino" talks about self-sustaining agrarian lifestyles and how they still exist today. Google translate seems to thing "Peasant" translate to "Campesino" aswell, but as a native Puertorrican Spanish speaker, my whole life known "Campesino" to simply mean "a person who lives in the countryside" and "Peasant" to mean more something like "A poor, lower-class person in mediaval times", and furthermore the former is simply a descriptor while the latter could possibly be insulting to a person of low-income. Gato feliz 2006 (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent discrepancy between the English and Spanish pages
Template talk:Feminism-stub

message: Is this stub meant to be used for feminism-related articles? -Aranel ("Sarah") 18:08, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen it used for feminism-related articles, which makes it seem a bit off, since feminism is about gender equality (and thus no more applicable to women than men). I would suggest that a separate stub be used for feminist topics and female topics. Which this should be, I don't know. Sarge Baldy 07:14, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cowl unit

message: Before I edit this page, I wanted to make sure there would be no objection...the GE GENESIS series of locomotives are not cowl unit locos, they are a whole new design from Krupp and GE that is basically a monocoque.  You can read it online here:  or, if you have access to the journal,   So before I take down the photo of the P42 and references to it (and potentially edit the cab unit article) I wanted to make sure this wasn't going to be a controversial edit.  Your input is requested.  Thanks!  VCA 12:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, never mind.  In light of a patent I located on the GE GENESIS locos, , they are confirmed to be of monocoque design and are in no way cowl unit locos.  I will edit this article accordingly. VCA 20:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead of the article says "a cowl unit is a body style of diesel locomotive", but the shortdesc (currently on wikidata, unimported) says "diesel or electric locomotive [...]". I have no knowledge on this subject, but this makes me wonder, which is right? No info on electric cowl units is present on the article, but maybe the shortdesc is the right one and we can find sources to expand on this? YuriNikolai (talk) 01:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortdesc/lead conflict
Talk:Mór Jókai

message: The title of this page should be: Jókai, Mór. Jókai was the surname, Mór the Christian name.
The above (anonymous) suggestion is not usual in Wikipedia, however, Hungarian names are usually written with accents (except for the letters not present in Latin-1 character set, and unless a person anglicized his/her name). So it should be named Mór Jókai, in accordance with the current practice.
--Adam78 10:14, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Because it could be read as a satirical allegory on Leninism and Stalinism in the Soviet Union, the book was banned in Hungary in the decades of the Communist régime. (Its "Critical Edition" was delayed until 1981.)"
First, Communism in Hungary ended in 1989, so if there was a critical edition in 1981, clearly the book wasn't banned in the last decade of the Communist regime (not to mention that the edition must have been prepared for some time before that, which probably wouldn't have happened if it had not received a green light already earlier). Second, the statement in parentheses sounds like an explanation and justification of the first statement, but if the only form the ban took was the fact that nobody took the pains to make new editions for a few decades (for whatever reason), that is hardly sufficient to call it a ban.--94.155.68.202 (talk) 00:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it refers to the Stalinist era (1949–1956), not the "soft dictatorship" of János Kádár's socialism 1956-1988.(KIENGIR (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if that was the case, it should be stated so, but note that the current text literally says "the decades of the Communist régime", whereas 1949-1956 is just 7 years, not even one decade. And, of course, the period of Kádár's regime, however soft, is always considered part of the Communist era (for that matter, it constitutes three-quarters of said era). Whatever the facts of the matter, this sentence is clearly wrong. A reliable source on the subject needs to be found and the sentence needs to be modified in accordance with it. --94.155.68.202 (talk) 18:58, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I already did that.(KIENGIR (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

text: Hi Man! Thanks, it was a good remark! I have just corrected the entry. 88.132.243.233 (talk) 10:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned under Communism?
Talk:Leisure suit

message: Love the image, but I am not certain that this placement complies with fair use guidelines. - PKM 18:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: There are...leisure suit conventions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.243.243 (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Conventions
Talk:Monday demonstrations in GDR

message: Why did the East German state-controlled media report the demonstrations? If they hadn't, people in other cities would only have heard about them through rumour, making them much more unsure about emulating the protests and much more unsure about the potential consequences. 86.136.88.187 04:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: West Germany had radio and TV transmissions sent into East Germany, so that most people except the Southeastern rim had "West TV" reception. Also, gossip (even via telephone) should not be underestimated. Finally, Leipzig was in the centre of the most populated part of East Germany, making it a sufficient pressure on the SED government. FlammingoParliament 21:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship
Talk:Autoregressive moving-average model

message: In the ARMAX section we have "Care must be taken when interpreting the output of those packages...", but no (sourced) explanation of how to "take care"...? • Serviceable†Villain 06:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Care must be taken? 

message: Hello! Just thought I would add a section here since I mentioned it in the AR talk page but I believe that the constant term c in the AR formula should not be included because many sources like Shumway & Stoffer's Time Series Analysis and its Applications, Box, Jenkins, and Reinsel's Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Wei's Time Series Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate Methods, and Brockwell & Davis's Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting do not include this constant. I wanted to just leave a note here and let anyone share their thoughts and opinions on the change. Eventually, I will remove the constant if no one has any objections. Moon motif (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing formula for AR model 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jz5863 (talk) 19:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu
Talk:Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir

message: Should the title of this article (in the en encyclopedia) be converted to an anglicised version of the name? (perhaps with the original language version in parentheses)
-- WhiteDragon 20:18, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Þorgerður Katrín Gunnarsdóttir is listed as Roman Catholic in the infobox. I don't have any proof otherways, but finds it odd, as the Icelandic native population mainly consists of Lutherans. I suggest to add a reference to the claim, or remove it. Grrahnbahr (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:Overkill (Motörhead album)

message: This and Bomber were not released in 1979 in America!108.81.33.59 (talk) 22:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release in the US
Talk:Bomber (album)

message: *Producer on heroin and rigging facts from "White Line Fever" - Lemmy's autobiography. Alf 11:53, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Renewable energy development

message: THe US is listed 1st and 3rd - what is the rationale for this? Sources for the table would also be useful. Gardar Rurak 05:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renewable energy utilisation by nation 

message: I know this page was created due to overflow from Renewable Energy but IMO the history and renewable energy today sections would be excellent replacements for much of the intro to the original Renewable Energy Article. Contributors please comment! --Huggsy 00:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: Under the major heading "Renewable energy support mechanisms," there is an article at the very end labeled "Energy generating products" that goes into some detail about a new technology for extracting energy from the impact on the knees while walking.  I found it to be quite interesting, but this seems like a strange place for this information.  I am rather new to Wikipedia, so I am hesitant to edit this myself (especially, since I can't immediately come up with an article this would fit into), so I will leave that to one of the maintainers of this page (or the original poster).  I just thought it might be helpful to point it out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phlict (talk • contribs) 13:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of place?
Talk:Administrative Procedure Act

message: This paper looks like it should have good information about the legislative history of the APA, but it doesn't seem to be available for download.  121a0012 (talk) 03:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Legislative history

message: See: https://books.google.com/books?id=IwnmNJNejHcC&pg=PT282&lpg=PT282&dq=Even+if+a+court+finds+a+rule+unwise,+it+will+stand+as+long+as+it+is+not+%22arbitrary,+capricious,+an+abuse+of+discretion,+or+otherwise+not+in+accordance+with+the+law&source=bl&ots=miH-Rcw62f&sig=OluGOgOHMBugs1UGlgiTNOOc2Jo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8_8OUt9HXAhXh54MKHeERAegQ6AEIMTAC#v=onepage&q=Even%20if%20a%20court%20finds%20a%20rule%20unwise%2C%20it%20will%20stand%20as%20long%20as%20it%20is%20not%20%22arbitrary%2C%20capricious%2C%20an%20abuse%20of%20discretion%2C%20or%20otherwise%20not%20in%20accordance%20with%20the%20law&f=false  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.187.119.165 (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much of "Standard of judicial review" section seems lifted off a book called Boomers are Coming
Talk:In Between Dreams

message: Hi, I was wondering. On the cover of the In Between Dreams album is a mango tree, isn't it? I didn't realise, but it does make sence to me, because the album is recorded in The Mango Tree studios in Hawaii and in Better Together Jack sings "we'll sit beneath the mango tree now". Is that correct? Maarten Inc. (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: Hi there! I just found this article on the web, and apparently it has some brief background about the album and Jack's opinion about the songs. I reckon it'd be a great addition to the In Between Dreams article. What do you think? WinZFactor 02:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition to the article?

message: Banana Pancakes is a vibe. 216.249.151.123 (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Niles Eldredge

message: " Punctuated equilibrium is a refinement to evolutionary theory. "
IMHO it's a desperate attempt to salvage an untenable theory. But I'm just one of those creationist yokels. Anyways, this sentence is definitely not a dispassionate neutral assertion. Not all evolutionists believe in PE. 38.117.214.70 (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Apparently, "Eldredge is a critic of ... the notion that evolutionary theory can be held accountable to patterns of historical data." Does anyone know what this means?  I did a Google search and couldn't find anything.
It did occur to me that it might mean "the notion that evolutionary theory can explain patterns of historical data".  But then again, he obviously thinks it can explain it to some extent since he has looked to the past to refine the evolutionary theory and come up with punctuated equilibrium.  Is it referring to written history?  i.e. the last few thousand years.  It is arguable that by that point society is so complex that evolution doesn't tell us much... but now I'm just making stuff up.  Does anyone know what the sentence in the article is actually talking about?  The phrase has been there since the first version of the article.
Yaris678 (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  Thanks.  I have made this change.  It's not easy to see what the change is with the standard diff, but if you use WP:WikEdDiff it is obvious.  Yaris678 (talk) 12:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accountable
Talk:Menelik I

message: Because Haille Salassie, was a direct descendant of Solomon and Queen Bathsheba, how did European become "Jews"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.200 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 31 March 2005  (UTC)
: See Diaspora. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haille Salassie 

message: The article states that Menelik I founded the Solomonid dynasty. However, that article says the Solomonid dynasty did not come about until 1270 upon the fall of the Zagwe dynasty. Or is this based on assertions in the Kebra Negast? For that matter, was the country called "Ethiopia" during Menelik I's lifetime? This needs some clarification. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: the Zagwe overthrew the Solomonic dynasty briefly, from 1137 to 1270. Otherwise it was Solomon all the way. 213.55.95.193 (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Solomonid dynasty

message: Menelik is said to have reigned in 200 B.C.  The prophet Isaia lived in 700 B.C. and was a contemporary of Hezekiah.  Solomon lived several hundred years before Hezekiah and Isaiah.  So how could Solomon's son have reigned some 1000 years later?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by OHIOHAM (talk • contribs) 12:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out.  While "Regnal Chronologies" is often a great and fascinating source, this time it seems a little suspect. All Ethiopian sources I have ever read, place Menelik I around ca. 950 BC, so if no one objects, I am going to revise the article accordingly. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of reign

message: This is more likely the Mausoleum of Menelik II. Menelik I is a semi-legendary figure, & there is no record of where he was buried. (Maybe not even in Ethiopia?) Menelik II, however, founded Addis Ababa & most likely was buried in this city. I suggest this photo be pulled until a reliable source can be found that confirms this building is a mausoleum or cenotaph for the earlier emperor. -- llywrch (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of the Mausoleum of Menelik I
Talk:FtsZ

message: Ok I just messed around with this alot.  Also there had been changes about whether it is a gene or a protein... the sad fact is that FtsZ is the protein and ftsZ is the gene and with Wikipedia's capitalization the two will forever be the same.  I wrote the article about the protein since the letters are permanently capitalized so the protein article is more appropriate.  User:Kablamo2007 | Talk 3 July 2005
What is that supposed to mean: "Around the neck"? Does that mean around the new cell membrane during telophase??? JFW | T@lk 21:33, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ashura

message: Below is some material removed for now from the article. It seems to show some evidence of early Muslims celebrating Yom Kippur, which occurs on the tenth day of Tishri, a practice that have become blurred with Ashura. The sources, none of which contain links or quotes, are not particularly illuminating. There is clearly at least one hadith being cited for this, though whether it is considered reliable or unreliable is unclear.
:Encyclopedia Britannica supported the connection above, so I have re-incorporated the material above around its basic structure. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to early Muslim celebration of Yom Kippur?

message: With reference to the recently added and removed material, this clearly occurred within the Ashura time period in 2022, but the timing appears coincidental. The central element to the story is that the perpetrator has some sort of Iranian Shia fandom backstory is and saw that Salman Rushdie planned a public talk. The attack is not clearly connected to Ashura in any way, other than in its timing. As an illustration, attacks perpetuated between 25 December and 5 January are not "Christmas attacks" because they take place within the 12 days of Christmas. The existing section of this page about terrorist attacks is focused on attacks on actual Ashura processions, where the connection is more evident. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Salman Rushdie attack