Talk:Lady Louise Windsor

message: Wouldn’t she become Lady Louise of Edinburgh? Lady Meg (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, daughters of dukes, even of royal dukes, are simply Lady FirstName LastName. See Lady Helen Taylor or Lady Davina Windsor. Piratesswoop (talk) 12:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think she's asking if Louise should now be Lady Louise Edinburgh instead of Lady Louise Windsor. Tinmanic (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Windsor (or Mountbatten-Windsor in its full form) is her surname, and that is not affected by whether her father's title is Earl of Wessex or now something else. Sbishop (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Sorry, yes, I meant to include that Edinburgh is her father's title, not her last name. Some British royal kids may use their dad's title designation as their last name for school, so if she did, it would be as Louise Edinburgh, but as Louise doesn't use her royal title, she remains Lady Louise Windsor. Piratesswoop (talk) 03:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. As William and Harry were known by their father’s title designation. William and Harry Wales. Their titles when born were Prince [X] of Wales, like the kids now. Just thought she might take on the Edinburgh “surname” like her cousins did with Wales. Been awhile since a Royal has been upgraded to a Dukedom while already having children. She should technically be “HRH Princess Louise of Edinburgh”, but alas that has not come to pass. Thanks! Lady Meg (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Lady Helen Taylor and Lady Davina Windsor are great-granddaughters of a monarch though. I’m aware that other non Royal Dukes children don’t have “of [X]” either. Just thought it was common practice—like Prince Michael of Kent or Prince William of Gloucester. Guess I’m missing the point that she doesn’t use the Princess title so she wouldn’t automatically become “Princes Louise of Edinburgh”. Is this the first time that a daughter of a Duke, that happens to be the son of a monarch, has refused her titles? Does that make sense? I spend a lot of time trying to get these things right. Thanks! Lady Meg (talk) 07:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not the first time. See Princess Patricia of Connaught who became Lady Patricia Ramsay. Keivan.fTalk 21:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Louise of Edinburgh? 

message: Who named the lake after her? The article says it was Manitoba's Lieutenant Governor but the source says it was Manitoba's premier (Gary Doer). -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 03:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The source doesn't explicitly say who named the lakes. It says Doer gave their father a couple of parchment scrolls announcing the names, but it doesn't actually say who signed the parchments or whose decision it was. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake 

message: :Lady Louise Windsor →  – "Mountbatten-Windsor" is her surname, not "Windsor". This was also the name of Prince Harry's children before they became Prince and Princess. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I've began a similar RM on James, Earl of Wessex to add the surname to his title for consistancy. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

text: I've taken the liberty of correcting the spelling from Lousie to Louise. Rosbif73 (talk) 07:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose: After doing a bit of digging on the Wayback machine, the Palace's succession page changed from "Lady Louise Windsor" to "Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor" some time between May 2010 and December 2010, but this change in official usage has not been systematically followed by reliable sources. Even looking at recent sources, plain "Windsor" is still common. Accordingly, I retract my suggestion that NAMECHANGES comes into play, and now oppose per COMMONNAME. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 June 2024