Talk:Denis of Paris

message: Should this not be at St. Denis? Bastie 14:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Easy. Click on Denis (disambiguation) and make a dab page linking to all the uses of Denis at Wikipedia that you have in mind. Once you're finished  at the head of the article here will make a link. --Wetman 03:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok done, thanks. Drutt 03:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! excellent! who'da known?--Wetman 06:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I think the link from the word "passio" to the page for "passion" is unclear.  Seems like a "passio" is refering to a written document ... whereas the page on "passion" refers to specific things or musical compositions.  I think we should either unlink it, or enhance the "passion" page to mention "passio"s?
Lynchmob98 19:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. I've remade Passio now to redirect to Passion (Christianity). Passio is simply Latin for passion, in this particular sense. A musical Passion is simply a musical setting. A musical Passion or a Passion play, are simply specific forms of presenting the Passion. Of course the Passion has come down as a series of written documents. --Wetman 20:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "passio" linked to "passion"? 

message: Sorry - added note about the medieval dispute between the Abbey of St Denis and Paris Cathedral as to the latter's claimed relic - and consequences of this for artistic depictions. Was about to link to an image on my website illustrating this 
(http://www.medievalart.org.uk/LeMans/111_pages/LeMans_Bay111_PanelB5.htm) but then noticed in the WP help files that linking to one's own website is frowned upon. Unfortunately I can't stick all my images on Wikimedia owing to French IPRights issues so not sure what the protocol is. Does anyone know any other images of Denis holding just the crown of his head that would suffice? StuartLondon (talk) 15:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You can link to that picture, it would be fine. The prohibitions on linking to your own website is meant to prevent self-promotion/spamming. Thanks for checking about it. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 03:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for the clarification Carl - have gone ahead and added the link. StuartLondon (talk) 10:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image links 

message: "Another account has his corpse being thrown in the Seine, but recovered and buried later that night by his converts." Yes, quite another account indeed. The link to an on-line RC website is broken. This account, clearly catering to modern requirements for verisimilitude, will have an interesting history, if we can find citations for it. Where did this "other account" originate? A French Third Republic popularization is my guess.--Wetman (talk) 22:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "another account"

message: As a reader, I came to this article and saw it has the 'undue' tag; added the 7th of July by someone at 76.20.47.0.  Yet I do not see any discussion of this tag here on the talk page.
When the tag was added, 76.20.47.0 commented in the edit field: (i.e. the idea that this individual actually existed instead of simply being a legendary figure.) 
I think the tag is unneeded, as there doesn't seem to be any controversy worthy of a tag. It seems more appropriate for someone concerned about this to add a paragraph or section to the article.
If no further clarification about the tag is forthcoming, I think it can be removed. Benthatsme (talk) 13:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, text clearly indicates that much of the information is derived from tradition and legend; tag removed. (good catch.) Mannanan51 (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged with 'undue' July 2014 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Denis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070107080025/http://www.catholic-forum.com:80/saintS/saintd03.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/Saints/saintd03.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Denis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20050422220922/http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/SaintOfDay/default.asp?id=1163 to http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/SaintOfDay/default.asp?id=1163
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.catholic-forum.com/Saints/saintd03.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205031504/http://tntt.org/vni/tlieu/saints/St1009.htm to http://www.tntt.org/vni/tlieu/saints/St1009.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Discussion has died down after having been open for a month with one relisting. The majority of !votes favor the WP:COMMONNAME policy over the MOS:SAINTS guideline.  Favonian (talk) 13:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Saint Denis of Paris →  – Per the clergy guideline WP:NCWC that discourages the use of 'Saint' unless it is necessary and the only viable option for disambiguation. ~ Iskandar323 (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 April 2022