lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neo-Victorian

message: Is there a reason why this is considered a Japanese article? I thought Gothic Lolita covered this, and was the focusing article about Japanese Neo-Victorianism.   Also, this article seems to be redundant as compared to Gothic Lolita and Gothic fashion. 128.61.29.174 (talk) 03:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Neo-Victorianism is not confined to Japan, so no I don't know why this is labelled as a Japanese article either. Unless someone has a specific reason for Japanese exclusivity I'd suggest removing the header. ~ Brother William (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed and removed. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan? 

message: Looks like this might be copied from Kevin Roebuck's Mobile Social Networks (). Only the last page is available as a preview on Amazon, but the last section almost matches entirely and the reference list is pretty similar too. Permission for this may have been given, but I couldn't see it anywhere.
:Thanks for pointing out your concerns! I've looked into it, and Roebuck's book was published in 2011. The content shows signs of having evolved here gradually for years before that; see, for example, 2007. In case that book was a reprint, I've looked through Google's catalogue for the author, and I don't see any book published before 2011. Sadly, this is a pattern. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation 

message: There seems to be no mentioning of the concept of neo-victorian sexual morals. Is that an entirely Scandinavian concept that doesn't translate to english? It refers to the eroding victories of the sexual liberation and a return of shyness of nudity (In many cases from American influence).Carewolf (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo-victorian Sexual morals 

message: The opening of the article starts off by citing a bunch of books that don't seem to be added to any kind of bibliography. It makes for reading it seem like a "to-read" list instead of just mentioning some of the works that are cited. I've done some minor editing on the leading section in an attempt to improve general readability, but I'm afraid that it will need to be rewritten and I'm not entirely familiar with this subject. Perhaps someone who is more comfortable with it, should take a shot at it. DontAskMeAboutThis (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy Leading Section
Talk:RAF Saxa Vord

message: Although Saxa may not have been granted the status of being a station, I'm pretty sure that it was not unmanned from 2000 to 2004.  Greenshed 01:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This section reads like advertising copy - it looks very much like a promotional piece has been inserted by a person connected with the business venture in question. Whatever the case, there is a lot of unsourced material which is clearly based on opinion rather than fact. 86.135.207.209 (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Future' section
Talk:Ōke

message: Actually the literal meaning of Oke is "Kingly House" or "Royal House."
Shirokuma1 09:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ō has two meanings, depending on context - it can mean either "king" or a male member of the Imperial Family (who doesn't have the higher title of shinnō), in which context it is translated as "Prince" Nik42 04:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The reason I removed the links is that there are no pages for the individual oke.  Every link was either a redlink, or something completely different, e.g., kuni is a disambiguation page which doesn't even mention the kuni-no-miya.  There's also no reason to create pages for each of the houses when it would duplicate this page. Nik42 04:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit
Talk:Second Cup

message: The third paragraph, starting with "In 2001, Rhéal Mathieu, a member of..." states that Mathieu was "sentenced to 9 years in prison", and it then says, "Mathieu was sentenced to one month in jail." Is this a mistake? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.167.161.34 (talk) 17:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Information 

message: It doesn't seem necessary for a store picture since not enough information is provided--seems to clutter the bottom part of the article. Anime4international (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Cup store picture 
Talk:Mark Hazzard: Merc

message: :To the best of my knowledge all the other seven original New Universe books referenced the White Event in some way.  Is Merc the one exception? Luis Dantas 13:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe so. It was the only NU series that didn't feature any superpowered characters. I think it was one of the ones slated for the first cancellation due to the more realistic violence portrayed and the fact that it, like a couple of the others, really didn't fit in the original concept for the NU.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.161.228.50 (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Spitfire and the Troubleshooters (a.k.a. Codename: Spitfire) also never made any reference to the White Event. NukeofEarl (talk) 21:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: White Event
Talk:Drew Pearson (American football)

message: You'd think that one should get a mention in the article, eh? Shanen (talk) 22:38, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the Hail, Mary pass? 

message: I don’t see it mentioned that he is in the Hall of Fame 2600:1702:2FA0:B4A0:AD85:F981:CF4D:9AC8 (talk) 04:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Fame
Talk:Chrysler Airflow

message: :It's a great article, but has absolutely no references. Themindset 20:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references. 

message: Lots of talk about aerodynamics; but not a single cd number!!
: What's a "cd number" in this context? 203.129.136.159 (talk) 13:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Coefficient of drag. Agreed, considering it was supposed to have revolutionary aerodynamics, it would be great to have Cd figures for the various Airflow models. --IanOsgood (talk) 17:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no drag coefficient figures? Should we be flagging it as citation needed?     Djapa Owen (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No C<sub>d</sub>-value!! 

message: From the text: "Rumors also persisted that the "new-fangled" body was unsafe, which was mostly true." Should that be ". . . which was mostly untrue."?
Just curious; otherwise an informative and well-written piece of work.
--Wiki wrangler 17:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small but significant error? 

message: should the Chrysler PT Cruiser be mentioned as it is a modurn vehicle with a retro design inspiration by the Airflow?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.235.92.237 (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. I think the PT Crusier was supposed to be inspired by souped-up 1930's Ford Model A's or something like that. ----DanTD (talk) 11:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PT Cruiser 

message: No mention of the Dodge Airflow tanker truck that was based on this car? ----DanTD (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodge Airflow tanker 

message: Why is there no information on the Airflow's engine, transmission and suspension system?   ----Scarlet Eagle  —Preceding undated comment added 23:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now!--Rockclaw1030 (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrysler Airflow Drivetrain 

message: Am I reading the article correctly? Were there only two limousine versions of the car built? --RThompson82 (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Limousine version?

message: That paragraph should be removed, it is pure urban legend.
In fact, he copied heavily from Bela Barényi's designs which date back to 1925.--Dahauns (talk) 15:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airflow being "inspiration" for Porsche 

message: Chrysler's history states the 1960 Valiant (released in '59) was unibody to match the Falcon and Corvair.
--JohnbRoberts (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting date of next Chrysler unibody
Talk:Blood Money (Mobb Deep album)

message: This is one of the best fuckin albums ive ever bought in my life!!! How in the hell could anyone hate this album?!?!? Almost any rap fan that doesnt pledge allegiance to G-Unit hates it, i cant understand that —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dabaron07 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this album get bashed?!?!?

message: how do you know Creep is a single? it hasn't got an article-SCB '92 (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creep 

message: the sales are wrong, it was not #1, only on rnb charts
and outta control remix was #6 on billboard hot 100
62.227.185.182 (talk) 22:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistakes 
Talk:CJMS

message: CJMS applied for (and was granted in April 2002) a power increase from 5,000 watts daytime / 1,100 watts nighttime to 10,000 watts daytime / 5,000 watts nighttime... but the station never implemented it, and that decision is no longer valid as CJMS never bothered to ask to renew the decision.
I recall reading a newspaper article in 2005 which claimed that CJMS was about to increase its power, but there is no record whatsoever on the CRTC website of any new application to do so.  (Although with the way the station is run, I wouldn't be surprised if they would raise their power without getting the proper authorization, but I digress...)  — ABCXYZ (talk) 05:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No power increase
Template talk:USCongDistStateIL

message: Seems like there is still some conflict between the articles. What about 4th congressional district of Illinois instead of Illinois' 4th congressional district? That dodges the issue plus Illinois's looks like the proper possessive vs. Illinois'. See also http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/possessives.htm Dual Freq 19:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illinois, Illinois' or Illinois's 

message: I'm revising the template, as there was never a 27th District (the 27th representative from 1913 to 1943 was always elected on an at-large basis). The page for Illinois' At-large district is currently a redirect to the article for the pre-1818 territorial repreentative; that should be changed as well. MisfitToys 23:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 27th District

message: What was the purpose of this major change?—Markles 12:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Before, all the links were to Illinois's 1st congressional district, etc., but the articles themselves were at Illinois' 1st congressional district, etc.  That meant that, when you were on one of the pages, the template never bolded for the page you were on.  I wanted to put in direct links, and because it was all templated up, I wasn't sure how to do this besides by substing everything. john k (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I see now that I failed in my attempt to do this. john k (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Okay, they all work now except the at-large and territorial, I think. john k (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major change
Talk:Prix Iris

message: I am sorry, I am unable to capitalize the title of this article. I will continue researching to fill in the enormous blanks. LLP 02:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Japan Times

message: Does anyone else think it's a fairly obvious WP:WEIGHT issue when the article includes only three images, two of which are the logo and the owner of the company with the then-president, and the third is an obscure editorial cartoon from 1942 that gives the impression the JT is still of a pro-war government-compliant propaganda rag it no doubt was at the time? I am sure Sankei Shimbun contained similar cartoons in the 40s, but its article doesn't contain such images. The article's text is also slightly tilted in favour of covering the paper's wartime propaganda era, but that cpuld be fixed by adding more coverage of the rest of the history: the image could only be theoretically balanced out by inclusion numerous more recent cartoons, an utterly ridiculous idea that would probably be a copyvio, since I doubt it would qualify under fair use. Anyone opposed to me removing it? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 11:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Note also that this would be a much better description of the paper's cartoon content. Also, note the reason they rejected this far less inflammatory strip was the word "gaijin". Amazing. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 15:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriateness of wartime cartoon's inclusion?
Talk:Peyote song

message: : “Witchi Tai To” lyrics by Jim Pepper, 1968, Lovetruth Music/BMI:
 What a spirit spring is bringing round my head
 Makes me feel glad that I’m not dead
 Witchi Tai Tai, kimarah
 Whoa Ron-nee Ka
 Whoa Ron-nee Ka
 Hey-ney, hey-ney, no-wah
 Witchi Tai Tai, kimarah
 Whoa Ron-nee Ka
 Whoa Ron-nee Ka
 Hey-ney, hey-ney, no-wah
: Everything Is Everything sings:
 Water spirit feelings
 Springin’ round my head
 Makes me feel glad
 That I’m not dead
: Brewer & Shipley sing:
 What a spirit spring
 Is bringing round my head
 Makes me feel glad
 That I’m not dead
-71.174.175.150 (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Witchi Tai To” lyrics by Jim Pepper, 1968
Talk:Fossil water

message: Removed from the article because I couldn't verify that the lake's waters are referred to as fossil.
:Lake Vostok is an exceptional example that is not an aquifer.
Daniel Collins 02:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vostok

message: I have removed this line from the article.  It appears to be an orphan; there is no context for the statement as found in the article.
:Radiocarbon dating has revealed that some aquifer water has been there for 40,000 years, since before the end of the last ice age.
--Kbh3rdtalk 03:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement removed 

message: Tritium is not a stable isotope rather it is radioactive and decays to He-3. Tritium is routinely used to directly radiodate waters up to about 120 years. 199.59.117.251 (talk) 05:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tritium
Talk:Youngstown (disambiguation)

message: I have just made a series of edits to remove material from a rather verbose para in this disambiguation article, where it was out of place.  I have incoprorated the unique bits in the article in Youngstown.
The effect of the changes on the Youngstown, Ohio article can be seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Youngstown%2C_Ohio&diff=44888259&oldid=43980290
... and the effect of the changes to this Youngstown article can be seen at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Youngstown&diff=44888957&oldid=38098787
--BrownHairedGirl 02:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro shortened
Talk:Launceston Christian School

message: Creation of the page - I'll do some more research and start setting things up a little better in the very near future. Just wanted to get started when I noticed that the school's not actually there at the moment.~Jaguar 02:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sa'id ibn Zayd

message: نبقساليزبيبسصصصسشيضضصيثيصثبقثببثللباالوتاىنعىنعمححججخةجةككككممنتىتاوززبثديبلتعغن
ردبسديسذسيوتاىتن،نناى ترادربلزلغاتعتعغاغفالدبابتاناغبالبزبيزللتامختححجخحك 2A02:C7C:5FBA:A000:3DDC:508A:3A19:43BC (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  وللبللباغفاعغتهمخهمخنلعا
Talk:Plymouth Acclaim

message: I propose to merge this article into Dodge Spirit. The only difference between the Acclaim and Spirit are the grille, taillights and trim, not notable enough for the Acclaim to warrant it's own article. A lot of the information in this article is not specific to the Acclaim itself, but an overview of the three cars in general and how the Acclaim differs from the Spirit, a number of this article's content even seems to be forked from the Spirit article. There also appears to be an emerging consensus that the non-notable Plymouth clones are having their articles Merged with the Dodges: Plymouth Sundance redirects to Dodge Shadow, Plymouth Horizon redirects to Dodge Omni, Plymouth Trailduster redirects to Dodge Ramcharger, etc. In the case of the Acclaim specifically, it and the Spirit were so interchangeable that Chrysler even marketed it together with the Spirit in the same commercials. If they're interchangeable enough to share a commercial, they're interchangeable enough to share a Wikipedia article. Reattacollector (talk) (via public computer). 64.85.150.114 (talk) 16:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge, but with a provision If anything, I think BOTH articles should be merged into Chrysler LeBaron, as they were both one-generation models while the LeBaron had multiple generations. I'm going to update the merge template and start a discussion on the LeBaron's page. Jgera5 (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Dodge Spirit 

message: There was some stuff about a Shelby package on this page, added by an ip in 2013. Seems like an utter fabrication, so I removed it.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Shelby Acclaim
Talk:Yoshio Kodama

message: In the articles on Uyoku, Kodama's release is explained as a "rumored" intelligence act by the USA, but in this article it is clearly stated as the CIA's doing.  This should be clarified.--210.174.29.143 (talk) 06:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency with other articles 

message: There seems to be a general lack of sources for this article. Additionally, the external links do not work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.170.219 (talk) 10:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The ELs suffered form link rot, but I've found their updated URLs, improved their documentation, and used them for citations. I've added a few more citations, as well. The current sources (especially Kaplan) should support everything in he article, but I don't have the time right now to extract page numbers for each individual item. --Xanzzibar (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverifiability
Talk:George O'Brien (actor)

message: Although he likely was, I removed the category because I couldn't find a source. Feel free to restore it if you do. JackO'Lantern 02:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish-American?

message: As I read the text, it is saying that "The Iron Horse" was John Ford's first film. This is not so. Ford began directing shorts in 1915 and directed his first feature in 1917 (Straight Shooting). "The Iron Horse" is his first epic -- about the building of the transcontinental railroad. It had 6,000 extras and was filmed on location in Arizona.  It also features (in the final scene) a re-enactment of the meeting of the Central and Union Pacific Railroads at Promentory Point using the two locomotives (Jupiter and #116) which actually met there. So, I think the reference to this being Ford's first film should be deleted or changed. Tres Passos (talk) 08:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not John Ford's first film - by a long shot
Talk:Yukimi Daifuku

message: It sounds translated "many people favourite" "because of its sweet taste," etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.179.225 (talk) 03:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs editing

message: Yukimi Daifuku → Mochi ice cream – Mochi ice cream was invented in California by Frances Hashimoto, owner of Mikawaya. Yukimi Daifuku is not the real name. The origins of the food should be reflected on the page and name. Falsedef 12:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~''
Oppose - Yukimi Daifuku is a brand of mochi ice cream, much like Ben & Jerry's is a brand of ice cream. Mochi ice cream needs it's own article. Calicore 19:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Alright, I'm making mochi ice cream as a separate page, and see the validity of your points Falsedef 11:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~''
Oppose - Yukimi Daifuku is a brand of mochi ice cream, much like Ben & Jerry's is a brand of ice cream. Mochi ice cream needs it's own article. Calicore 19:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Alright, I'm making mochi ice cream as a separate page, and see the validity of your points Falsedef 11:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Dolly Martin

message: In most cases, I've saw that her name was listed as Dolly Read Martin. Allemannster 02:36, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Used surnames in combination

message: When did she move the the United States? Does she hold British citizenship, American, or both? Nietzsche 2 (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to USA, nationality
Talk:Senusret II

message: I don't know how to change this, but the praenomen and nomen of all the senwosret are backwards. The praenomen reads as senwosret, but that's his nomen. Praenomen are assumed names which are never exactly shared by other kings. Nomens are the birth names that we know the kings by.
Compare: 
Look at the 12th dynasty kings. The praenomens come first, and senwosret is always a nomen. Thanatosimii 05:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hieroglyphic names 

message: wrong picture.. the picture is of king shabaka Htshepsut (talk) 07:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong picture
Talk:Night Force

message: "After only 14 issues, Night Force was cancelled due to an underestimating of the series's sales."  Is there a source for this?  If not I believe we should remove the it as it seems to indicate that the book shouldn't of been cancelled and that sells were great, which isnt shown to be true anywhere.Gamekeeper7 (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Needed?
Category talk:Wikipedians interested in roads

message: Here's a little history as to the origin of the term "roadfan" in this context:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/8e7e07e151e1aa7c (Dec. 21, '99)
Since then, I realized that the term can also refer to people, often European, who participate in road rallys....  Mapsax 02:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1991 riot in Zadar

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/05/the-militarism-of-german-foreign-policy-and-the-dismantling-of-a-state/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Psychonaut (talk) 12:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed