lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Landau, Luckman, and Lake

message: Landau, Luckman, and Lake is correct. Unfortunately I don't know how to do that to the main page. Ghen55 (talk) 23:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And you know this how? --Loremaster (talk) 03:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Basic English states a comma before and | but | or ... Also its in the comics like that. 68.80.116.215 (talk) 11:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I've moved the article to correct that mistake. --Loremaster (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for coming in to this late but... BOTH are correct, depending. And since this is based on an American comics company, I think the style common in America ought to be observed. Jersey John (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: commas

message: Is there a comic book where we actually see Landau, Luckman, and Lake or, at the very least, the logo of their company? If so, someone should scan and upload the scene? --Loremaster (talk) 20:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Needed 

message: Anyone else notice the similarities between Landau, Luckman, and Lake and Wolfram and Hart from Angel. Both are shadowy interdimensional companies that attempt to control the future of humanity. Both have the three word names. (You have to know that Wolfram and Hart really stands for the wolf, the ram, and the hart). Seems to me that Joss Whedon might just be a fan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.105.133.94 (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarities to Wofram & Hart
Talk:Business Bay

message: I would like to know why this image was deleted from the Business Bay article.  I believe that it is pertinent to the article.  The most important thing is that the image shows the Business Bay logo.  It also gives credence to the existence of Business Bay, which is extremely necessary on an encyclopedia.  Also, the image did pertain to the article and was not offensive.  It was something that added to this article, which is what Wikipedia wants on every article.  I believe it should be brought back.   Leitmanp 04:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Think copyright violation. Not yours, but the advertiser's. I have listed it on WP:IFD. MER-C 05:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Deletion

message: The image in the infobox is misleading.  Although the article is about Business Bay, the image does not include anything in Business Bay.  All towers in the image are located in Downtown Dubai (the development being created with the Burj Dubai) or along Sheikh Zayed Road.  Even though this image was taken practically within Business Bay, and that Business Bay is located directly between where this image was taken and Downtown Dubai, it does not depict Business Bay.  I think this image is better.  Although the quality is not as good, and Downtown Dubai is also within the picture, it would better show Business Bay.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 07:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone ahead and replaced the image.  Please feel free to continue this discussion at any time.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 23:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in the Infobox 

message: The file :c:File:Downtown Burj Dubai and Business Bay, seen from Safa Park.jpg used in this article has been nominated for deletion but was kept
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 09:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons 
Talk:Brown rice tea

message: Good job for adding details about how to make Hyeonmi Cha. As I haven't made one myself (I only drank it from tea packet), I just put the dictionary definition of Hyeonmi Cha, which had very rough description of how to make it. Now I can make one myself :) Stevefis 05:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

message: If poured into a glass carefully without using a sieve, a few grains of rice will go into the cup. I am told by a Korean friend that this is normal and okay. Can this be confirmed by other Koreans? I would like to add this information to the article. Badagnani (talk) 09:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It wouldn't be a big problem if you drink it with the grain, but in a typical tea shop or cafe that serves Hyeonmi cha, it is usually served without the grains, because some people likes to drink it without it. It goes same as bori (barley) cha, etc.Stevefis (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grains 

message: "While in restaurants the tea is typically strained and served without any grains of rice, when prepared at home a few grains may be poured from the pot into the cup." This kind of sentence would apply to almost any kind of teas and besides, it is more of a common knowledge rather than a specific knowledge about Hyeonmi Cha. It's like adding a sentence "When using a common teabag, a black tea is prepared by simmering the teabag in a hot water for a for few minutes and then the teabag is discarded or used for other purposes." You put information that people would find 'informative', not a trivial common sense like this. You need to put information that is derived from authoritative sources not personal experiences or opinions Stevefis (talk) 04:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You should take a look at Wikipedia:No original research It clearly states that Wikipedia is clearly not a place to publish your own opinions or experiences, which also includes mine. I just answered the question in the discussion, because I thought you were merely curious, but I didn't expect you to put it in the actual article.Stevefis (talk) 04:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a collection of trivias 

message: ko:WP says that this drink may be sweetened with sugar or honey. Is this correct? Badagnani (talk) 23:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I never sweeten hyeonmi-cha before drinking. But then I never sweeten green-tea (obviously), black tea, and coffee. I guess some people sweeten hyeonmi-cha with sugar or honey. Apparently, that's what ko:WP says as well as its source.Stevefis (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweetening
Talk:Ajax-class ironclad

message: The link in the category box at the bottom of the page says "List of Royal Navy Battleships" but actually links to this list of Dreadnought battleships. The class is correctly shown on this  list of ironclads. I would make the change myself but I don't know how and I don't want to break the boxes at the bottom of the page. Thanks. Darkstar8799 (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misdirected Link 

message: Really? What about the fact that Defence was ordered as part of the same four-ship programme as the Warrior class? They were designed as a smaller alternative for assessment purposes. The actual follow-on to Warrior was, of course, the 400-foot Achilles. The follow-on to Defence was Hector.
And what about the Hero being followed by the not-smaller Sans Pareil?
Devastation followed by Dreadnought?
Are we being encyclopedic or are we just posting up fun biased pub factoids in this article? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:9534:E525:4832:87A7 (talk) 02:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "historical tradition"
Talk:Indians in Singapore/Archive 1

message: I have tried to leave the original substance intact while reducing the length of the entry. I hope I have done justice to this culturally important entry. --David91 21:18, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to article

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be 'Indians in Singapore' rather than 'Indian Singaporean', in the same style as 'Chinese in Singapore' and 'Malays in Singapore'? Jacklee 03:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article 

message: Hi, if you're the user who did the recent updates to the article "Indians in Singapore", thanks very much for your efforts which have greatly improved the article! Could you provide sources for the information that you've included (particularly the percentages)?
Also, may I encourage you to become a registered user of Wikipedia and join the community? Cheers, Jacklee 13:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to "Indians in Singapore": Thanks
Talk:Everett Strupper

message: One can find him called "Stroop", "Strupp", or "Ev" . Cake (talk) 16:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: A note on nicknames

message: Looks like Strupper ran for a 65-yard touchdown on that play, according to Heisman. Cake (talk) 00:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Tech-Penn picture
Talk:Pellucid marginal degeneration

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be "Pellucid marginal degeneration"?Garvin  Talk 07:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  capitalization  

message: I have this disease and have been well treated with dramatic improvement in sight with rigid contact lenses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.143.187.254 (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatments
Talk:Enrico Fermi (disambiguation)

message: Obviously, I think so! Both the NPPs are often referred to simply as Enrico Fermi. The one in Italy is also called simply Trino Vercellese when it might otherwise be unclear which of the two NPPs is meant.
The alternative was to put a see also section or a things named after this guy section or something similar into the Enrico Fermi article. This seemed a better option to me. Andrewa 05:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we need this disambig?
Talk:Picnic Day (Australian holiday)

message: Does the disambiguation really make sense? Is UC Davis really the only institution in the world to have a picnic day? I think not. 
Even if it is the only one, would people looking for the UC Davis event really be confused by an article entitled "Picnic Day (Australia holiday)"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djapa84 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  UC Davis is significant?
Talk:Caorso Nuclear Power Plant

message: and was the first in the nation when built - unsure what this means but it's at least misleading as Latina Nuclear Power Plant opened in 1963, Caorso not until 1978. Nor was it the first BWR, that was Alto Lazio Nuclear Power Plant which opened in 1964. 
I think it might mean biggest, but biggest what? Biggest NPP? Biggest power plant? By which parameter? Or does it mean best? Feel free to put the claim back if you can clarify it.
(note that it's been closed for a decade) - if this belongs anywhere it belongs in the article text, not as part of a photo caption. Andrewa 05:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text
Talk:Eczacıbaşı

message: == External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Eczacıbaşı. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added TilesWale ( https://www.tileswale.com/ )
*Added Bluecera ( https://bluecerallp.com/ )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.195.29 (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Eczacıbaşı. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added TilesWale ( https://www.tileswale.com/ )
*Added Bluecera ( https://bluecerallp.com/ )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.195.29 (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:British Birds (magazine)

message: Could the source for the year of founding be provided ? Shyamal 05:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this necessary? It's a simple fact, and it is printed in the journal itself. What external source would you like? GNUSMAS : TALK 09:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, no longer problem. When I requested the info. I had some conflicting info at hand which needed verification, but I just got confirmation and is more than clear with current issues noting that this is the centenary year. Shyamal 09:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding year
Talk:The House Is Black

message: For the past several years, this article has erroneously stated that the colony featured in The House is Black is Behkadeh Raji; whoever added this information likely got it from the Behkadeh Raji article itself, as that too included the incorrect statement. How the mistake was made in the first place, I have no idea - but according to this article from the Archives of Iranian Medicine , the colony featured in the film is actually Bababaghi Hospice. I've gone ahead and made the appropriate changes - a slightly more in-depth explanation of my research into this matter can be found at Talk:Behkadeh Raji#Not Featured in The House is Black. --Jpcase (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bababaghi, not Behkadeh Raji
Talk:Clonal selection

message: Or is it just a special subcase of Clonal deletion ? --Rajah 06:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Also called Clonal deletion ?

message: "If non-self tissue is introduced, the lymphocytes which develop will be the ones which included the non-self tissues as self tissue."  Antecedent of "the ones which included the non-self tissue as self tissue" is not present or unclear.  Phrasing is awkward.  Can't suggest fix, since I don't get the meaning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inselpeter (talk • contribs) 17:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning Unclear
Talk:L'Egisto (opera)

message: I have reverted a deletion by USER:Bilby. The text concerned, supported by two independent and reliable citations, is 
"A new edition prepared and directed by Marcio da Silva was performed by HGO at The Cockpit Theatre, London in June 2021".
It happens, as User:Bilby knows, that I am chair of the committe of HGO Trust, the charity which undertook the production. But the text quoted does not promote HGO, it is a valid, and third-party referenced, statment, that a new edition of the opera L'Egisto, was created and performed. The mention of this should not therefore be treated as a COI.--Smerus (talk) 12:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly what a COI is - adding content about an organisation where you are the chair. You know this, and you have been told repeatedly - by multiple editors  - that you should not directly edit articles where you have a COI. Raise it on talk (as you have now done) and let someone independent decide if it should be added. I'm sure it will be, but you should not be making the eidt yourself. Editing with a COI just creates too many problems. - Bilby (talk) 12:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Others have reinstated the text. I remain (thoroughly) unconvinced that User:Bilby has been correct in what I consider to be an over-enthusiastic interpretation of COI in the present instance.--Smerus (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All you need to do is stick to what you said you would do - rather than edit articles directly when you have a COI, just raise it on talk and ask for an independent editor to evaluate it and add the content. That way there won't be any concerns, and the content is very likely to be added anyway. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI misinterpretation
Talk:Weymouth Quay railway station

message: I've put "reversal needed" on the infobox. In spite of the proximity of the town station to the tramway there has never been a platform there for it and the quay line joins the South Western Main Line north of the station. Boat trains of yore were taken straight to the quay as they could not call at the town's main station. Britmax (talk) 00:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ventnor West railway station

message: The article says its in Castle Close, surrounded by other newer buildings now. Anybody know which one it is? --24.21.149.124 (talk) 07:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The large building opposite the bus stop on this map.  The marker on the article isn't on the main building. --Peeky44 (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the railway station?
Talk:AT&T

message: NOTE: I’m proposing the following edits for FleishmanHillard on behalf of AT&T. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines. Below, I’ve outlined requested edits to the Venues and Sponsorships sections to account for accuracy given changes that have occurred. Please let me know of any questions or comments as you review. Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request: Venues & Sponsorships 

message: NOTE: I’m proposing the following edits for FleishmanHillard on behalf of AT&T. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines. Please let me know of any questions or comments as you review. Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 17:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the the first part of the quote unbolded. If you want to discuss the changes or make further changes, you can do so by replying below. Pabsoluterince (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! Jon Gray (talk) 17:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request 

message: That comedian John Oliver who has a huge following in the US, and whose firm indirectly works for AT&T, criticized the company for its funding of the far-right conspiracy spreading channel OAN, with tens of millions of dollars, is highly relevant so that numerous sources picked up what Oliver said, so it should not be reverted like this.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BALASP What makes John Oliver's opinion due here? Including his non-neutral critism has little overall significance to this controversy and AT&T. Pabsoluterince (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

text: Should have pinged  Pabsoluterince (talk) 05:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of referenced content 

message: NOTE: I’m proposing the following edits for FleishmanHillard on behalf of AT&T. I am a paid editor and aware of the COI guidelines. A few pieces of information in the lead section are now outdated, so I’m proposing the following edits for accuracy. Please let me know of any questions or comments as you review. Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 21:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Note: I didn't use the alltopeverything.com citation for the world's largest telco by revenue addition. I've instead linked to List of largest companies by revenue article page, where one can see that is the case (and it carries a citation there). See Ptrnext (talk) 03:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Jon Gray (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request – Lead Section Corrections
Talk:Acceptance angle

message: The term acceptance angle is also used in microphone design and photographic lens design. This page should probably become a disambiguation page. Andrewa 06:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Srleffler 04:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I propose this article to be merged to the  numerical aperture. Amir.azeri (talk) 09:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It can't be merged, because this is not an article, it is a disambiguation page. It's a navigation tool that points to other articles, not an article in its own right.--Srleffler (talk) 02:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Lydenburg

message: Might it be a suggestion to split this article into two: one for the town of Lydenburg and one for the former Boer republic? Michel Doortmont (talk) 09:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article into two? 

message: I'm a bit confused, if the township to the west of Lydenburg is called Mashishing, but the actual town of Lydenburg has been renamed to Mashishing as well, then are they two towns with the same name? I can understand if they were merged but they are quite a distance separated? Bezuidenhout (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2012 (U
:This renaming business seems to be a real mess. What's the official name? (In terms of WP:COMMONNAME Lydenburg can remain as the article name) Park3r (talk) 13:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mashishing? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. No support for the rename except the proposer, who was blocked   (t · c) buidhe 21:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lydenburg →  – Town was renamed in 2006 and reliable sources regularly use the new name.
https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/i-will-keep-hunting-them-down-says-mpumalanga-cop-who-helped-put-away-12-serial-rapists-20211211
https://lowvelder.co.za/764079/local-model-wins-mr-teen-mbombela/
https://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/south-africa/2021-05-09-cops-hunt-for-mashishing-community-members-involved-in-mob-justice-attack/ Desertambition (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 January 2022
Talk:Utrecht, South Africa

message: In response to the translation request at Wikipedia:Pages_needing_translation_into_English#Utrecht.2C_KwaZulu-Natal --NJR_ZA (talk) 18:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I proofread it and added it. Another Type of Zombie talk 12:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: :I proofread it and added it. Another Type of Zombie talk 12:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: English

message: Would anyone like to start selling Avon #Beautyourway kindly let me whatsapp +27766105646 41.150.225.77 (talk) 10:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any Avon Interest
Talk:Griekwastad

message: Winburg also claims to the be oldest settlement north of the Orange River  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Socrates2008 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Yes, I know this is English Wikipedia, but the town is now only known historically as "Griquatown", why don't you also move Kokstad to Koktown, or how about Pietermartizburg to Peter Maritzburg? Unlike towns like Grahamstown (Afrikaans Grahamstad) or Prince Albert (Afrikaans Prins Albert) the town is only known as Griekwastad, look at all signs leading to the town, they are all "Griekwastad", even though the neighboring sign will also point to "Cape Town", rather than "Kaapstad". Bezuidenhout (talk) 12:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Swellendam

message: According to Wikipedia, Paarl and Franschhoek are supposed to be older than Swellendam. Could anyone please clarify that contradiction? 191.184.68.209 (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Third oldest town

message: Could someone identify the name of the local 1931 newspaper and also where I could find a copies of it. 
Antoinette S. 102.165.68.205 (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of local newspaper of 1931
Talk:Talat Sao

message: The renovations to Talat Sao have completely changed the look of this shopping center. If anyone has a newer picture,it would be nice to have. Also, the renovations section of the article should be updated. Sadly, it will be a while until I can make observations first hand.
Bluesleeper (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renovations