Talk:Wizardry 8

message: This article reads more like a review than an encyclopedia article. — JIP | Talk 08:22, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Much of the article reads like a positive review, and not a reference work.  I purged a few obvious ones, but this article needs a serious re-examination to enforce the neutral point of view Alan De Smet | Talk 06:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Not so. Umpani is switched for T'Rang, Mt. Gigas is switched for Marten's Bluff. The difference is the party's alliance at the end of Wizardry 7. Digifiend (talk) 13:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old discussions 

message: Sir-Tech Canada was disloved around Christmas 2003. A lot of good people lost our jobs and went to E.A. or other places. Sir-Tech US closed in 2001 BEFORE the release of Wizardry 8! Our games are not public domain, but as far as Wizardry 8 goes, no one holds the copyright as we were not bought out... it is abandonware, and can (should) be copied and shared unless Sir-Tech regroups someday ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.148.2 (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No clue what you meant by "our", but just because the USA office was closed doesn't mean the office in Canada is not able to hold copyright to Wizardry 8. As far as I know copyright remains to exist even after the creators go bankrupt, pass away or otherwise vanish from planet earth! Although I doubt an organization like Sir-Tech could sue someone for copying a game that's becomnig extremely rare to purchase ;P Redtails (talk) 16:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SirTech Canada 

message: I just went to this article today after my friend asked me if I had ever heard about the game.  I had not, so I went here to read up about the game.  The Gameplay section is way too out of focus.  The first paragraph discusses the primary role of the player in the game, a paragraph that should be in the Story section.  The fact that the main quest of the game is to find some artifacts and put them on some altar to become a God is not part of the Gameplay, it is the premise of the story behind the game.  It should be in the Story section.
The article also mentions nothing about how the game is actually played.  It mentions things that are different from previous installments, and mentions the automap system, but it doesn't actually ever go over the ACTUAL gameplay in the game!  I have no idea how this game is played.  All I know is that monsters appear on the mini-map, unlike the previous games, and that you can kill them.  I also know that there are at least three locations, two of which decide where you start and the third is where your party allies are.  That's about all I know about this game, in regards to gameplay.  That's not a complete article in the least.
Since I know nothing about this game myself, it is not my place to edit this article.  I have nothing to go on, not even experience.  As such, someone who has actually played this game in any amount should be the one to make the changes. Polantaris (talk) 08:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay Section needs Rewrite. 

message: I would have to agree that this article does not read like an article. I removed an uncited insult to people who didn't like the game. It may be true or not but without citations it just sounds like a pot shot at those who dislike your pet game.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.174.15.122 (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations would be nice  

message: Can anyone find a source for the (seemingly erroneous) claim that Brenda worked as Lead Designer on Wizardry 8? Her MobyGames article lists her credit as 'Game Design' and 'NPC Scripting & Dialogue', and Wizardry 8's MobyGames article lists 4 other developers alongside her in a 'Game Design' role. Is there any basis to emphasising her role in the production over her fellow designers? 58.7.75.180 (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brenda Romero/Braithwaite's role 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Wizardry 8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://gamespot.com/gamespot/features/pc/bestof_2001/p5_01.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://64.49.205.17/newsandevents.asp?show=138&thetype=1
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sir-tech.com/index2.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://gamespot.com/gamespot/features/pc/bestof_2001/p5_01.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sir-tech.com/index2.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sir-tech.com/index2.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sir-tech.com/index2.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespy.com/goty2001/pc/pc_rpg_runners.shtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sir-tech.com/index2.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sir-tech.com/index2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified