lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Llanes

message: ... seems to be completely messed up by the infobox; it's unreadable (and unprintable) using Internet Explorer :-(.  Anyone know how to fix?  If not, I'll move the box to the bottom again .. it's really background/reference material. mfc 16:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the size of some of the photos and there was some improper syntax in the parish table, so the infobox seems to fit now. It is better to have it at the top since that is the standard format of other cities in Asturias (and, indeed, most of the world), and you can see at a glance where the municipality is and what size, population, etc., which is certainly useful if you're not very familiar with Asturias. In my Internet Explorer it is readable (not sure about printable), what comes up on yours? Rigadoun  (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's much better -- thanks.  It still is a bit 'sparse' at the top if you have your browser (I too mostly use IE) in a portrait mode.  Is there a way to make the infobox narrower?  (I agree it's best at the top if possible.)  mfc 15:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting of this page 

message: To my knowledge Eucalyptus is not native to Spain - that a traditional fiesta involves the felling of this tree requires clarification  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.23.33.226 (talk) 07:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Hoguera - Eucalyptus? 
Talk:Pastoral lease

message: Hello SatuSuro, yes I am new to Wikipedia and have an interest in the establishment of simmilar references to pastoral leases/runs simmilar to the WA pages for Victoria. Through my general knowledge I know that the term run was used in the early years of land settlement. As squatters moved out from Sydney, Melbourne and Portland the aquired land just by staking claim to it or squatting on it (hence squatters) and this land became known as a "run" and later as it was surveyed and given title, then they became known as leases, but still the term run carried on. Later in the cases where land was fertile it was further subdivided for closer settlement. Times dates names for this would be plentiful in the history books. I just need time to put something together.
In wikipedia there are 778 references to pastoral run, and in google I was able to find reference in all states except Tasmania. However, I concede that lease is a more specific term, where by pastoral run, pastoral property, and pastoral land may be more loose terms applying mostly to pastoral leases but also other land at different times. Thus these names should be mentioned in a secondry context and not in the first sentence. As for citation look under "Austalian National Dictionary" Pastoral,a. As yet I haven't figured out how to add citations. (Pjbarber (talk) 04:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comment
Talk:Freebord

message: I thought that Freeboard was the generic name for this type of BOARDsport, and that "Freebord" is a brand with it also being a slang way of spelling it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FairfaxMoresby (talk • contribs) 20:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note this close was reverted. - brenneman {L}  07:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Freebord or Freeboard

message: I am removing the following since it is blatantly POV (emphasis mine):
Although there has been a recent trend away from slide related tricks and lame moves such as the 'tommy gun,' the best riders are now looking to move the ride more in the direction of snowboard freestyle.
Furthermore, there is no source for this statement.
24.18.245.76 (talk) 00:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lame" tricks 

message: I'm not sure what's going on, is this an article for a specific style of board manufactured by one company or for a generic type of board manufactured by any of several companies?  And then what's up with the Freeboard article?  Should they be merged?  Should the generic information from this article be moved to the Freeboard article?  Also, this article reads like one big advertisement for Freebord and why is there only one inline citation?  What's the point of all the other references if they're not being used to support various claims in the article?  Is there anyone around who knows enough about this stuff to get fix the citation problem? SQGibbon (talk) 08:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As this article does not seem to be about the company/product, I'd say it should be merged to the generic term. Yworo (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Freebord is a company and it looks like that they might have invented this style of skateboard.  It's entirely possible that as a company they are notable and might warrant their own article.  Some of the content currently in the article appears to refer specifically to the product made by Freebord.  The generic information in this article could be moved to the freeboard article and then this article could be expanded to focus more on the company and less on the specifics of their products. SQGibbon (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The company that makes Freebord is called Freebord Mfg. and does not currently have their own article. The term 'Freebord' is a patented brand name for the specific board made by Freebord Mfg. and no one else. The term 'freeboard' is a misspelling of the brand name. The two articles should not be merged.  Jahjahw (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a specific brand or a generic term?
Talk:Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory

message: I've inserted an image, but don't know how good it is. I have another one without the flag pole but with the Coat of Arms over the front door. Let me know if you'd like me to upload it instead. Cheers. -- Adz|talk 15:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: This court refuses to acknowledge the existence of dirt files by ensuring that victims of such files to gain guilty pleas in lower courts simply can not afford the money required to mount a strong case within its  system of justice that is designed to conceal a culture of criminality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.64.100 (talk) 01:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dirt files / Information kept by police and not provided to courts to gain guilty pleas
Talk:Television in Singapore

message: I support this merger. The list of channels is small and could easily be absorbed by the stations article and make a strong, informative and definitive article about television in Singapore. Wisekwai 16:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Is this section necessary? - oahiyeel talk 07:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stations from neighbouring countries 

message: This article makes it seem as if broadcasting in Singapore began in 1980 with the Singapore Broadcasting Corporation. It began in 1963 with Radio Television Singapore. I'd suggest article author to rewrite this piece.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.132.3.13 (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  INACCURATE ARTICLE 

message: I guess that the article is out dated. There are multiple broadcasters in Singapore now with Starhub and Singtel. I request the associated editors to review the article and update. --Freknsay (talk) 08:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The article is outdated
Talk:Jean-Pierre Papin

message: In French, a "Papinade" is not especially a bicycle shot, but a powerfull volley shot. If someone could express that in correct english .... --213.56.150.217 16:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papinade definition 
Talk:Paul Kossoff

message: The page has a huge chink missing - everything between 'early life' and 'death'. Has it been accidentally deleted?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.254.201.36 (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole section about his time with Free has been mysteriously deleted too. Flanker235 (talk) 10:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As I am aware of the fact that the Les Paul is still in use and owed by by Arthur Ramm. Ex Becket group member 1980,s North East of England.82.30.186.48 (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Kossoff. Guitar 
Talk:Sportklub Hakoah Wien

message: I think this page should be returned to Hakoah Vienna as this is how the team is most commonly known in English. From Wikipedia:Naming Conventions: "Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article unless the native form is more commonly used in English than the English form." --dm (talk) 16:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name move
Talk:A Devil's Chaplain

message: Does this book really contains stuff on genetic determinism? In some of Richard Dawkins related articles, there was the statement that the gene-centric view of evolution and selection is often confused with genetical determinism, and I was wondering if that could not be the case. I really don't know, as I've not read it yet, so it's more a call for attention of anyone who has. --Extremophile 16:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The bogey of genetic determinism needs to be laid to rest. The discovery of a so-called "gay gene" is as good an opportunity as we'll get to lay it.
Laurence Boyce 16:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essays on [[genetic determinism]]? 

message: My library has two versions of this book. The one I've got here is subtitled 'reflections on hope, lies, science, and love', while the other is simply subtitled 'selected essays'. Was the latter only used for the American version? I have added the former as a subtitle in the article, though I haven't been able to find anything more about this on the web. Richard001 (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subtitles
Talk:Media in Sydney

message: will it be possible to locate a person in australia by the local dailies...if not then i would like to advertise and have a copy of it back here in fiji...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.235.77.33 (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  to locate a person in australia by advertisment in local dailies
Talk:British Rail Class 501

message: Re: SELHURST EPB SANDITE UNITS
by EMD GP9 » Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:23 am 
NO  The LMR never possessed any EPB units and the vehicles we are discussing here are 500% SOUTHERN.
The LMR was host to the Class 501 units, which like all MK1 suburban units were derived from the 1951 EPB.
According to EMD GP9 on the Railchat site the Sandaite Units were Southern Region EPBs 
[See reference here]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.195.120 (talk) 11:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not converted to Sandite Units?
Talk:Bailiwick

message: Any relation to the Celtic "Baile" (as in townland)? --Henrygb 16:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Baile

message: On August 16th 2006, at 10am CST, Rob Edinger , the Network Security Manager of Jostens Inc, used the term "Bailiwick" in a presentation to sound more self important. It just made him sound like a pompus windbag.
Removed as NPOV and not relevant (81.105.97.152 15:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 16 August 2006

message: Pompus windbag indeed!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.137.155 (talk) 11:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bailiwick response 

message: When we have “(German: ballei) ” in the text, then there seems to be no dot on the “i”. And as a German noun, it is always with capital letter. --Schwab7000 (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  minor detail
Talk:Borradori

message: This article should remain on Wikipedia (and not be deleted) so that when individuals search for "Borradori" they are directed to the "Borradori, Giovanna" page.
:If that's what you intend to do, use the redirect link. Don't create another article. --Tuspm  Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me 16:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Australian Museum

message: My links are continually being deleted however they hold strong relevance & are absolutely correct to be inserted into the page.
Could someone please explain why my links are being deleted?
Adam Unsigned comment by . Moved from Talk:Australian Museum/Comments to main talk page by . 09:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Replying on IP user's talk page. -- saberwyn 09:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of links 

message: There is an absence of detailed, factual information concerning this museum's holdings, historically and at present. Also, what is the history of the building, along with everything else one might find in a WP article about a major museum? Is this even a major museum? The SJW emphasis of the article constitutes undue emphasis, and seems to have killed off any further interest in improving it. Is there any shortage of WP:Reliable source coverage of this institution?--Quisqualis (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article remains unfinished 

message: Yesterday (3 January 2024), the Australian Museum released an update statement stating that after consultation with the exhibition's curator, they will not modify the text regarding the term “Palestine”, see https://australian.museum/about/organisation/media-centre/ramses-text-panel-statement/. I haven't seen this latest update covered in any other news outlets yet, other than the initial SMH article already referenced in the article's controversy section.
@Trenchist: since you added this section. Also, welcome to Wikipedia, please feel free to have a read of Help:Getting started if you're interested. Fork99 (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey @Fork99. I've updated the page with the new information from that source. Trenchist (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palestine controversy section
Talk:Powerhouse Museum

message: The Powerhouse is undertaking a major rebuilding of the front entrance along with a new outdoor piece by Japanese architect Shigeru Ban. Info and project documents are at http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/revitalise/index.php/reconstruction/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snarl808 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rebuilding project

message: Good story but.... No, it wasn't the only article to survive, and, No, it didn't remain intact. It lost several large chunks in the fall. --Amandajm 02:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Graphite Elephant 

message: Formal request has been received to merge: History of the Powerhouse Museum into Powerhouse Museum; dated: June 2020. Proposer's Rationale: The History article is relatively short and provides more detail than the current History section on the main Powerhouse Museum article, and a Merge would ensure that the information about the History about the Museum isn't conflicting or self-contradictory.  ~Jh15s. Discuss here. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 11:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. The two should be merged. Much of what is in the "History" article is already repeated in the main one and the rest could easily be incorporated. The main article has the capacity to become a Featured Article and any additional information from the subordinate "History" article ought to be part of it, in order to be more complete, as well as to reduce the likelihood of its becoming redundant or contradictory. Furthermore, the institution's "history" is an integral part of its changing story and so is not a helpful heading. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 00:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree they should be merged. The only reason to separate the History from the main article would be if it was so large that it would make the main article excessively long. This possibility seems unlikely; even if it happens, the History section could be spun off as a separate article at that time.  Reify-tech (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Sydney Tramway Museum

message: The 'Preservation' section is a direct copy from the museum's SMS (Document STM6065http://www.sydneytramwaymuseum.com.au/sms/STM6065.pdf) with only a footnote attribution. Is it really appropriate to be simply cut-n-pasting out of the museum's own documents ?
The entire section is a verbatim copy of 6065 including the classification codes the museum used for each asset which make little sense out side the collections management side of the museum.
Matthew.geier (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preservation section is just a direct copy of a museum document 
Talk:Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

message: It is proposed to merge :Court of Appeal of the Northern Territory of Australia into this article. While the Court of Appeal is a separate court, it forms part of the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeal article is two lines long and could easily be incorporated into this article, with a section on appellate jurisdiction. Feedback is welcome. Rangasyd (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection! Mathew5000 (talk) 15:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration

message: The 40 hour week case was a landmark and historic decision of the CCA. I am surprised that at this time there is no WP article about the history of the 40-hour week in Australia. The case took 2 years to hear, and was vigorously prosecuted by the ACTU and other parties, and just as vigorously defended by business groups, notably Cecil Nathaniel McKay (son of Hugh Victor McKay of the Harvester case fame), managing director of Sunshine Harvester (at the time of the case), president of the Royal Ag Soc and (some other peak business lobby, I can't recall which). The following two sources are a good starting point for anyone who wants to take this on 1) reprint of SMH article from 1948 describing the introduction of the 40-hour week: https://www.smh.com.au/national/70-years-ago-today-the-40hour-five-day-working-week-began-20180101-h0c3dd.html, and 2) the biography of HV McKay at the Australian Dictionary of Biography, which discusses CN McKay. I also found numerous Trove articles (trove.nla.gov.au) with running commentary of the case. I hope this helps someone document an important historical event in Australia's industrial relations story Prime Lemur (talk) 03:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Fair Work Commission maintains the Sir Richard Kirby archives website which has a good list of notable cases, including a page on the 40 hour case, including the decision. Many are High Court cases that impacted on the work of the court. In addition to the 44 and 40 hour week cases the arbitration decisions are 1912 Fruit pickers and 1929 Schoolteachers cases.  Find bruce (talk) 04:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of section Notable decisions
Talk:Supreme Court of Queensland

message: The Supreme Court has unlimited civil jurisdiction and has no lower limit of $250,000.
From 1 November 2010, the Magistrates Court will have jurisdiction to $150,000, the District Court to $750,000, and only claims above this limit should be commenced in the Supreme Court.  However, there is no lower limit as this article suggests.  Some civil claims may only be brought in the Supreme Court, such as Admiralty claims or applications seeking certain orders.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.86.2 (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil jurisdiction 

message: This looks very ugly, and while noting I did just add a judge to the list (who I think is at least as notable as the others listed), this could probably be improved. Maxxisti (talk) 08:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of notable judges
Talk:Constitutional basis of taxation in Australia

message: Since the word Commonwealth used here is capitalized does that mean it refers to the "53 member Commonwealth of Nations" as it says here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth
If so does that mean revenue from Australias income tax is distributed amongst all of the 53 member Commonwealth of Nations and not just Australia?
:No, the "Commonwealth" here refers to the "Commonwealth of Australia", the nations official title, and not the Commonwealth of Nations. And no, there is no relationship to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, either. --Michael Johnson (talk) 01:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficulty in interpreting the article 
Talk:Wik Peoples v Queensland

message: I've pulled this out for now. It had some vandalism (by the original author), but even with that removed, it still has issues and I'm not sure how to clean it up.
"In 1788, Australia’s east coast became Crown Land, land claimed in the name of the English monarch. Officials justified this with the claim that Australia was terra nullius - Latin for land belonging to no-one - which justified acquisition by British occupation without treat or payment. This effectively denied acknowledgement of Indigenous Australians had a previous occupation and connection to the land."
I'm not sure what "treat or payment" is meant to mean (treaty), the Terra Nullius article would seem to imply that the name came after British settlement (so was it really a "justification for officials" at the time?), etc. It probably makes sense to have a paragraph here providing some background, though. Maybe something out of the Mabo No. 2 article? 2403:5808:2:0:68B2:E0AC:AB7C:C97 (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious section

message: Who are Martin and Horrigan?
*References for Martin and Horrigan are now fixed. Assize (talk) 09:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Australian Taxation Office

message: Performed a significant edit of existing content without adding much at this time, including rewording to more closely reflect ATO-provided information and appropriate referencing. Some changes to internal structure and title details. Removed negative gearing link (more appropriate to Taxation in Australia, not the ATO article) and added to Law Enforcement category due to their extensive work and powers in that area. Ausref 15:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article just repeats the corporate blurb ;-( 07:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Blurb

message: I've changed the 'ministers responsible' box to reflect the post-Ruddsurrection cabinet, but with Minister for FInancial Services and Superannuation no longer being a thing, didn't know who else was responsible for the ATO
101.172.85.70 (talk) 00:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2013
Talk:One-Roll Engine

message: It is a start and very stubby at the moment, but eventually it would be nice if this page could end up with a nice layout and expantion of information to be much like the Storyteller System article or the GURPS system section.<BR />—Asatruer 16:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout plans and room for improvement

message: It’s kind of sad that nothing about it is mentioned here given it’s been out for a few years and was well received.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.12.150.202 (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Angels
Talk:Ko e fasi ʻo e tuʻi ʻo e ʻOtu Tonga

message: "free translation"? "real translation"? What exactly do these mean?  Is it saying that the first is more of a poetic translation, while the second is more word-for-word literal?  Or does "real" mean official? Pimlottc 16:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The intention was poetic as opposed to literal. As far as known there is no official English translation.
People who do not know Tongan are requested not to meddle around with the Tongan spelling. --Tauʻolunga 09:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Free translation" 
Talk:Alliance for the Good of All

message: Could someone move this, please? "Welfare" is a value-loaded term, and "good" is a closer equivalent of "bien". Alliance for the Good of All is used by:
* The BBC
* The Guardian
* El Universal / Miami Herald
*and the  Klingon Imperial Diplomatic Corps.
Most of the hits for Alliance for the Welfare of All are Wikipedia, and its mirrors and vampires. Aille 16:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move