Talk:Colposcopy

message: about the way in which the tool was invented and perfected for use by a nazi? http://www.forward.com/articles/9946/
the whole thing was invented by nazi studies carried out at Auschwitz! disgusting.--90.218.3.239 (talk) 11:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It wasn't invented by a nazi Dr, but the inventor received contributions (pictures and samples) from experiments performed by a SS Dr (Eduard Wirth) during WWII. I just added this info --Dexter_prog (talk • contribs •  count) @ 12:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: nothing is mentioned

message: A pregnancy test is not usually administered before the exam as it states in the article.
:Changed sentence to read: "In some cases, a pregnancy test may be performed before the procedure." --Renice 13:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: procedure

message: :Editors should be aware that the user Drsavard (and apparently 71.224.215.219) who proposed these changes does consulting work for QIAGEN pharmaceutical company, which is the owner of Digene, maker of the HPV test.  Therefore they have a potential WP:COI regarding HPV testing. Zodon (talk) 06:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Think "benefits of safe sex" was better - other aspects besides just condom use that may be protective.  More complete reference to the ACOG bulletin would help.  Suggest tying multiple references to same item together (name= ) so don't get multiple numbers for same ref.  Is min sex partners an especially major risk factor?  (Was covered under safe-sex)  Smoking and diet (and condom use) seem more relevant.  Wording about HPV virus testing is misleading.  It is of no known  benefit in absence of abnormal pap.  Suggest better to leave it out here and focus the information in Pap smear or HPV prevention articles.  At least suggest clarify, and fix to NPOV.  Zodon (talk) 08:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information 

message: SEE:  Update on ASCCP Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Screening Tests and Cervical Histology, American Family Physician, July 15, 2009  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewjonathandorfman (talk • contribs) 02:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines have been updated in 2006.  Important changes have been made.  Article needs updating. 

message: There is a German language Wikipedia page for Hans Hinselmann. 
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Hinselmann  
As it is a red link here on the English page for Colposcopy, is anyone able to translate and create a page for him so it can become a much appreciated blue, readable page?   Thanks!  Aequitas333 (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of the Hans Hinselmann wiki 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Colposcopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111122628/http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/publications/bulletins/sane_4_2001/welcome.html to http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/publications/bulletins/sane_4_2001/welcome.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Colposcopy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615105902/http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Newspublications/News/MRC002621 to http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Newspublications/News/MRC002621
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In section: "Indications," the illustration is meaningless to the average reader. (Too technical.) Unexplained, it is the graphical equiv of "jargon." This does not meet Wiki guidelines,  — which in fact are specific regarding this scenario.  That illustration needs explanation or deletion.
Quoting Google result:
 "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Make_technical_articles_understandable Jump to Avoid overly technical language - Main guideline: Technical language in Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Use jargon and acronyms judiciously. Explain technical terms and expand acronyms when they are first used. In addition, you might consider using them sparingly thereafter, or not at all."
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Avoid_using_images_to_convey_text  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:39FA:784C:21C9:F793 (talk) 18:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptic illustration.