lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Future stations UK

message: I've noticed that some of the London stations that are listed on the template (City Thameslink, Dagenham Dock and Canning Town) are actually existing stations which are planned to be added to DLR extensions.
Should they be listed in this template, as they aren't "Future stations"? D-Notice (talk) 12:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing stations 

message: What this box needs is a clear definition of what should be included. Currently it has new stations under construction, stations at various stages of planning, and re-opened old stations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.195.96 (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: Iv'e noticed there is not a page on the new southend airport station, I don't have much Info on this so can some give me some info on this station, and I could make the page. Likelife (talk) 09:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there likely to be a station built there in the next ... (let's say) two/three years? Kevin Steinhardt (talk) 15:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks as if it'll be the next few months, see here (need to click "Projects" link on menu bar at top). --GuillaumeTell 17:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  And also here Eddie6705 (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! ive created a page. Likelife (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  southend airport 

message: There has been talk for a while of a new station between  and  stations on the Midland Main Line, so called "Brent Cross Thameslink" this is the reason Crickelwood and Hendon platforms arent being extended. So should there be an article on the proposed station which, is also proposed to be a interchange with the proposed North and West London Light Railway.  Likelife (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. There has, indeed, been some talk but I've seen little evidence to date that the plans are realistic (eg. being taken seriously by railtrack/operators, funding, etc.) Worth a mention but I'm less certain it justifies an article yet. --AlisonW (talk) 16:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brent Cross Thameslink?
Talk:Outline of botany

message: See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines".
The Transhumanist 01:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines" 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Neuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa

message: The phrase "Neuropathy, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa and Ptosis" redirects here but there is nothing on the page about Ptosis.  
64.142.13.174 17:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ptosis 
Talk:WC discography

message: Hey, is there someone who can help with the information about "West Side Heavy Hitter" which I believe is a mixtape released in 2004 by WC, is this so? If so should we add it to the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.216.111.251 (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Side Heavy Hitter 
Talk:Dorchen Leidholdt

message: Not only is her year of birth missing, but her place of birth and all other basic biographical facts are missing too, which is remarkable for a lawyer.
One suspects that she may have changed her name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.134.237 (talk) 11:07, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Greetings! I've proposed a couple of editorial suggestions on Talk:Sanctuary for Families, one of which would affect this article. I invite anyone with opinions or suggestions to please feel free to participate in the discussion. Thanks and have a nice day. -- Bgpaulus (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on Sanctuary for Families talk page 

message: Could anyone please provide sources for the given claims and statements? 87.164.124.179 (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 
Template talk:Aircraft carrier classes in service

message: Right now, this template has a rather odd combination of naval ensigns and civil ensigns; The flags for Brazil, Spain, and the United States are all civil-only flags, instead of naval ensigns or jacks. Before going in and making changes, I figured I'd drop a note on the talk page and see if there is a reason it is arranged this way, and see if some sort of consensus can be forged to come up with a consistent format. Horologium (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags
Talk:Texel guinea pig

message: I think that adding more unique information on each guinea pig breed is a brilliant idea! ^_^
I thought that there were more in-depth articles on the guinea pig breeds? Maybe you can use some of the judging rubrics from Standard of Perfection? If you were to merge, and still make the seperate, more in-depth articles on other breeds, maybe you could use the info and my pictures? I have some good pictures of different breeds that I took myself.
Thank you!
Fluffyetta (October 14, 2007 8:45 PM)
:But the problem really was with the sources of the content. Most results on google(after typing in guinea pig breeds) can't be used. Remember it's better to have a short article with everything sourced than a long article that is completely unreferenced. True there are books which have some info on various guinea pig breeds but like VanTucky had said(in the above discussion), a lot of them only have one or two paragraphs on each breed which isn't really enough for an article. But we could use the pics and info(which hopefully can be sourced) in the Guinea pig breed article (this article was merged into that article) and we're thinking of expanding each of the subsections of each breed that doesn't have enough information for their own article. The only guinea pig breed that has enough info and sources for it's own article is the Skinny pig article and so this will be left as it is.  AngelOfSadness  talk  21:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi, I made the article.
Talk:Eagles Auditorium Building

message: The URL http://www.nr.nps.gov/, given as a citation on this page with accessdate 2007-10-12, is just the generic National Register Information System search page. There is nothing about this building on that page, so the citation seems to me to be essentially useless. - Jmabel | Talk 23:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the relevant citation: http://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/seattle/s16.htm. - Jmabel | Talk 23:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless citation 

message: I'd really like to be able to add to the article that it was for many years a major concert venue, but I can't find anything that our policies consider citable. This is kind of absurd: it was probably the city's most notable rock concert venue from the mid-1960s into the early 1980s, but I can't find anything that says so in so many words. Any suggestions? - Jmabel | Talk 00:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concert venue 

message: No objection to the one image currently in the article, but if this ever grows to have enough space for another then 
this pano I did probably should be added. - Jmabel | Talk 06:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panoramic image 
Talk:From the river to the sea

message: Feels more like the article is about the PLO's usage of the slogan rather than the slogan itself. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , this is being discussed above in the section called "First Aliyah". VR (Please ping on reply) 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second lede paragraph 

message: Does not match the reference, nor is the statement backed by historical evidence. Statement and citation should be removed. 2607:FEA8:1C41:7B00:4CD3:103E:6087:53D5 (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 3 contradicts statement it is cited for 

message: The following statement 
> Many Palestinian activists have called it "a call for peace and equality" after decades of Israeli military rule over Palestinians while for Jews it is seen as a call for the "destruction" of Israel
is in the lead. This seems to me transparently racist as it ascribes a belief to an entire ethnic group. However, interestingly enough, a similar statement is made in the cited AP article (which is odd since I'd expect this to violate their editorial guidelines). Despite this I think it should be removed and replaced with something non-racist. JDiala (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: We should try to find another reference because it is unclear what AP means,  all Jews, everywhere, Israeli Jews, most Israeli Jews, or what. Selfstudier (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is obvious that it means "most Jews everywhere". It is quite common, even in highly reliable sources to say "X" when you mean "most of X". Don't make a mountain out of a mole hill. I thought I already resolved this by adding "most" before "Jews". How did that get removed? Vegan416 (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "Obvious" won't do, that's OR. this is more balanced, it is interesting that Israel's Likud is inspired by the same call in the other direction and I don't hear anyone saying that Palestinians are hearing a call for their own destruction, read apartheid and genocide by a settler  colonial state. better remove this oversimplification entirely. Selfstudier (talk) 16:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL. You "don't hear anyone saying that Palestinians are hearing a call for their own destruction, read apartheid and genocide by a settler colonial state"??? This is said again and again all over the media... Vegan416 (talk) 16:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's put it in then. Selfstudier (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome... Vegan416 (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist statement should be removed 

message: Netanyahu Minister to Nations Recognizing Palestine: 'Only Israel From the River to the Sea' Selfstudier (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New usage by Israeli gov
Talk:Broughton-in-Furness

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 10:06, 06 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:The Savage Detectives

message: Why is this novel considered Spanish? Is it because it was first published by Anagrama, a Spanish publisher? If so, one should consider Cien Años de Soledad an Argentinian novel, since it was first published by Ediciones de la Flor in Buenos Aires...
Bolaño was a Chilean émigré and considered himself a latinoamericano above all...
This article is badly in need of repair.  Spelling and grammar errors abound, there's a list of characters that's really pretty irrelevant (unless someone decides to try and decode who each character is standing in for), and there isn't even a picture of the book.  I would have thought that a book that drew such praise would have a much better article, but I thought wrong.--168.122.108.74 (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

message: There has been a very puzzling revert: in the table of characters, the left-side column is for links to fictional characters (e.g. Arturo Belano) whereas the right-side column is for links to real persons (e.g. Octavio Paz). But for a few entries, there was confusion: Octavio Paz was linked twice, both as a fictional character (he's not) and as a real person.
* So, I edited then them to unlink the left-side Paz (still leaving its right-side link to Paz), and so on.
* By the way, I also fixed the erroneous "Veronika Volkow" to "Verónica Volkow" (-ca and accented).
My edit has been, er, savagely reverted, demanding a talk page explanation. Well, here it is.
Also, the list is missing a ton of diacritics and this revert has created an "edit conflict" with all the fixes I typed and was about to post. So what I'm going to do is:
* I'm first going to restore my reverted edit
* Then I can copy-paste and post my diacritic fixes
After that, if there are still problems, please improve them instead of reverting wholesale like the first time (deleting the fixes to Verónica, etc.) 62.147.8.8 (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation. Please consider signing up for an account, as it will help your edits in being well considered. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 23:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to characters vs. real persons 

message: I thought the savage detectives were the narrators in the middle section
also, the sexual exploits of the young Garcia, while not impossible, seem improbable  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 20:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: two questions
Talk:Red Power movement

message: Peer Review: This article is really great. I used the "perfect Wikipedia article" to judge it, and you hit every mark. It seems like this article needed a lot of work and you've really provided a non-biased overview of the Red Power Movement. It's also helpful that you linked a lot of thing to other wikipedia pages, such as the occupation of Alcatraz, or AIM, and added a further reading section. The formatting for your lead is a little weird right now, the citation is on a different line from what you're citing and it's created space in between the two sections. Also, if possible, specify your hyperlink for the IAT. It doesn't redirect to an actually article.Whitlesj3134 (talk) 02:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article presents a strong overview of the Red Power movement and highlights some key events. I think the coverage of the issues you've chosen is generally strong. I would suggest some broadening in these directions:
* NIYC should be more fully discussed.
* The demand for universities appears in "Legacy" but there's more of a story to be told here, including American Indians in the Third World Liberation Front and the demands for D-Q University.
* Include a list of occupations led by Red Power activists
* Include the reversal of termination as a major legacy.
* Women of All Red Nations (WARN) deserves coverage here.
* So does the International Indian Treaty Council.
You might find useful material in…
* Dan Berger with Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, "The Struggle is for Land" (course reading)
* Bradley G. Shreve. Red Power Rising: The National Indian Youth Council and the Origins of ...
* American Indian Activism: Alcatraz to the Longest Walk
--Carwil (talk) 16:38, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Alternate versions of Green Lantern

message: Concur with User:66.109.248.114. Please do not remove tags. This article was created unilaterally and without discussion with other editors, circumventing the consensus process. --Tenebrae 19:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag removal

message: I'd like to rename this to List of alternate versions of Green Lantern.  It reads like a list, looks like List of minor Star Wars characters, I'd like to call it a list. Hiding Talk  21:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: With all lanterns merged to the original page, this page has been redirected to Green Lantern.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.109.248.114 (talk) 23:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Hangwa

message: *Move to Hangwa. Badagnani 00:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move proposal

message: Wikipeditor, FYI, this term is referred to as "韓菓" in the Doosan Encyclopedia while your source from The National Institute of the Korean Language says 漢菓. I sometimes see incorrect information from the both sources. I guess this is either a mistake occurred after they wrongly transferred contents from paper to the online, or the two cases are both used. So without contacting the both sites, I don't think you can say that "you're wrong". 
On the other hand, traditional Korean confectionery was originally called "jogwa (造菓 meaning "making (fake) fruits"), but the term, hangwa was made to differentiate with yanggwa, Western confectionery (洋菓). 韓 means Korean, while 漢 represents Chinese. For example, Han River (Korea) (漢江) was named as such because the river runs toward the West, Chinese continent. I searched 한과 菓 in Google News, and among 17 hits, only 5 hits are 漢菓 including "opinion from a reader" who has a relative running a hangwa factory and one's link is broken. So well, emailing is necessary, I guess. --Caspian blue 05:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In another Korean Encyclopedia, the hanja for the food is referred to as 한과(韓菓)와 양과(洋菓).--Caspian blue 06:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I might've slip my mind not as checking your source carefully. The entry does only refer to "one" of yumilgwa (fried confection), not Korean confectionery as a whole. I'll revert your edit then.--Caspian blue 06:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The hanja 
Talk:List of West Coast hip hop artists

message: Shouldn't any artist without their own page be deleted from this list?Noit (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: His name is missing from this list. However is is a friend of West Coaster Snoop Dogg and features on the song, "how long will they mourn me" ewith 2pac at least on the album 2pac Greatest Hits. EdGilmour (talk) 15:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nate Dogg

message: The Old Pessimist (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: they do not have a Wikipedia article about them: Sly Boogy. See WP:WTAF. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2021
Talk:Higman's embedding theorem

message: Says every countably generated group is a subgroup of a finitely generated group. Whose result is that? Charles Matthews 18:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to SQ universal group, it was proved by HNN in 1949. Algebraist 18:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Try . 70.90.174.101 (talk) 02:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Boeing XF8B

message: What does this mean "a variant of the B-29 tail"? It has a generally Boeing-style tail, like a P-38 and Constellation and a Hudson all have distinctly "Lockheed" twin tails. That doesn't mean they "gave the Constellation a P-38 tail", it means that is the design the company chooses, both for performance and for brand recognition. The B-29 has a tail that is identical to the B-17, so wouldn't it be more accurate to say they gave it a B-17 tail? Although the original B-17 used a much different tail, without the fillet. The B-29 is much closer to the B-17 than the XF8B is to the B-29. The only similarity that is evident is that it follows a generally similar curved shape, but the proportions and shape are totally different. For that matter, the Privateer has a tail much more like the B-29 than this plane has. So did the B-32, and the B-36 if I recall correctly. 
Idumea47b (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "B-29 tail"?
Talk:Donghae Expressway

message: Busan–Ulsan Expressway should merge from here. Busan-Ulsan Expressway and Donghae Expressway in Korean Wikipedia merged too. Look ko:토론:부산울산고속도로#부산울산선, 동해선 합병 관련.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 07:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . It looks like a merger would make sense, though I don't speak enough Korean to know whether they are indeed the same thing, but looking at a translation of the merger discussion, it seems like the proposal is a bit contentious? Maybe we should wait to see the outcome of the merger discussion on the Korean Wikipedia and examine the arguments on both sides. What do you think? Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 09:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In South Korea's presidential decree, that two expressway is one.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 12:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Jungang Expressway has same problem too.--ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection from me. Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 15:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  who added a merge template to the Busan–Ulsan Expressway article some time ago and then removed it shortly after. What is your opinion, 김지성1? Ry's the Guy (talk|contribs) 15:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Opposed Because :ko:부산울산고속도로 (기업)(Busan–Ulsan Expressway (Company)) is not merged to :ko:동해고속도로(Donghae Expressway)--ツバル (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Busan–Ulsan Expressway is not about company. In Template:South Korean expressways, There are written that Expressway No.65 is Busan–Ulsan Expressway and Donghae Expressway. And that two expressways have Template:Infobox road. Donghae Expressway is looked like already merged. --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

text:  Don't you have any more dissent? --ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) 05:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry for my long absence. I agree to remove Busan–Ulsan Expressway from Template:South Korean expressways. I think that Busan–Ulsan Expressway should be included in the company template like :ko:template:대한민국의_고속도로_기업(ROK Expressway Companies).ツバル (talk) 14:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Complete (News from Babel album)

message: Is the album leinght correct? Work Resumed on the Tower 34:47 + Letters Home 35:18 + contraries 3:00 = 73:05, if the leinghts are correct at the album articles. My CD player do not show the leinghts. 87.95.146.139 (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the length should be 73:05 – I've fixed it. —Bruce1eetalk 08:27, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leinght