lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cessna 188

message: Cessna AgWagon → Cessna 188 – Nearly all of the articles on individual Cessna models are titled as "Cessna" + model number, e.g. "Cessna 150" or "Cessna 175." Further, the model 188 exists in a variety of models, not only the AGwagon, but also the AGpickup, AGtruck, and Aghusky. SkipperPilot 03:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support 132.205.44.134 04:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Add any additional comments
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Vegaswikian 06:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Mostly at this point we need some photos of 188s to illustrate this article. I have put in a link to Airliners.net where there are lots of photos. This can be removed once someone finds some photos we can legally use in the article Ahunt 11:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos?
Talk:Dunseverick Castle

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Castle Upton

message: I have removed what I feel are advertisements for this location as a wedding venue and as property for sale. I feel the "Works Cited" section should also be removed for this reason. NOidentity (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adverts removed; "Works Cited" section too? 

message: So know you know the basics of the truth, Iv got everything ing, I’m happy to start sending scree shoots 146.90.1.222 (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liars
Talk:Mental Ray

message: I understand that the name of the product is "mental ray", but surely it becomes "Mental ray" at the beginning of a sentence, like any other word beginning with a lower-case letter. What is Wikipedia's policy on this?
If mental images do not permit their product to be capitalised (although they are not at liberty to enforce changes to the rules of English grammar), then perhaps it would be wise to avoid using it at the beginning of a sentence (for example, replacing "mental ray is..." with "The product mental ray is..."). — Paul G 09:38, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right.  They don't get to change the English language!  Silversmith  Hewwo 23:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can someone please upload an image or two that showcases this software?
::I've added an image. I'd like to add a few more, demonstrating specific features of mental ray, if people think that would be ok? Zzubnik (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''No graphics'''
Talk:Bulstrode Whitelocke

message: Recently the file :File:Bulstrode Whitelocke from NPG (2).jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 01:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Bulstrode Whitelocke from NPG (2).jpg]]
Talk:Piper PA-18 Super Cub

message: Good start, but the intro should be broken up into sections. Inline citations and references are also needed. --Colputt 02:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Military operators:
Luxembourgish army, 1953-1968 3 Piper L-18C Super Cub 
Sources;
http://www.mnhm.net/cms/index.php/en/the-news/129-an-extraordinairy-souvenir-for-the-museum
Kind regards
Hans
Luxemburgarna (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Luxembourg as military operator 

message: A small plea for clarity. The present text mentions "The high-lift wing and powerful engine..." Would that be better expressed as, "The low wing loading and high power to weight ratio..."? Or is there something special about the aerofoil and engine? 2A00:23C6:9026:E201:69E6:4D68:3100:529E (talk) 06:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wing loading
Talk:Piper PA-24 Comanche

message: I have fact tagged just about this whole article. Other than one minor citation of one fact, it has no references at at all. It has been tagged with a header for some time but that hasn't motivated anyone to add references.
Hopefully the fact tags will help editors identify where the refs are needed. For anyone who doesn't think it is important for Wikipedia to be scrupulously referenced, I suggest that you read this CBC article. 
Please do not remove the fact tags unless you are replacing them with references. At least they will alert readers that this article is unreliable. - Ahunt (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact tagging

message: Howard Piper no more "designed" the Comanche 400--and I have enough Comanche 400 time logged to know--than Howard Hughes "designed" the Lockheed Constellation.  Pug simply told his engineers to build him an airplane that could get him from Lock Haven to Florida nonstop and fast.173.62.11.59 (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is tagged as unsourced so it can be removed -  - Ahunt (talk) 10:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pug Piper didn't design the Comanche 400
Talk:Piper PA-25 Pawnee

message: Hi, I've heard a rumour that in the UK in the 70s or 80s, someone noticed that fitting a four-bladed prop gave better performance and less noise. Can anyone verify this? There's no mention of it on the page. I've certainly noticed that every UK pawnee has a four-bladed prop and every US pawnee has a two-bladed prop. Thanks. BWDuncan (talk) 17:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two/Four-bladed props 
Talk:Jordan's Castle

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 23:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Hillsborough Castle

message: As of today, the article includes the following "Under the Government of Ireland Act, 1920 a new dominion called Northern Ireland had been created." This reflects a misunderstanding of that Act and the term "Dominion". NI is part of the UK; it is not a separate dominion, new or old. The Act merely devolved power to a particuoar part of the UK. I will amend the article accordingly. 84.203.76.88 (talk) 20:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of term Dominion

message: Various inflammatory connotations were used here before my recent edit, all very not neutral in Britain, in particular Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.   Why depart from consensus titles of individuals into rigid, staid old titles - it's ridiculous, it may have well as read Her Supreme Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. 
There is since 1998 no more role as the centre of full 'direct rule' as tritely stated, it is muted with a quite powerful Northern Ireland Assembly. - Adam37 Talk 22:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The above is hardly surprising, the tone of the article was pre-1998 and indeed neglected its events in the lead 

message: The article currently states that Hillsborough Castle is the official residence of King Charles III when visiting NI. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to say that it is the official residence of the British monarch, not King Charles personally? Lonegroover (talk) 08:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to the length of tenure of we can expect of modern monarchs, this could feel like some to be a quibble.  But I'm supportive of this change, surely more correct? Mark83 (talk) 08:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this change. Dormskirk (talk) 11:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, change made. Lonegroover (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official residence of the British monarch
Talk:Audley's Castle

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 23:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Ardglass Castle

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Quoile Castle

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20050314123530/http://cloghmore.bravepages.com/down/quoile.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ♠Vami_IV†♠ 11:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Narrow Water Castle

message: Is Narrow Water Castle a Water castle, meaning: Is it surrounded by water-ditches or is it just at the bank of the river and the other 3 sides are not protected by water? In the latter case I will take Narrow Water Castle out of the article Water castle. Those of you, who have seen the castle: Please answer. --Rheinländer 09:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a castle at the Narrow Water of Carlingford Lough, as I understand it. There's also a tower on the opposite shore of the narrows, to control passage in the lough. Certainly when I visited, Narrow Water Castle was at the side of the lough-side road, between the road and the shore of the lough. I walked round the exterior landside wall - it was not moated (but whether it may have been moated in the past, I don't know). Man vyi 13:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Man vyi! The Castle is not a typical water castle, so I will take it out of the article water castle. There is Motte on the map only a few hundred meters away from the castle. --Rheinländer 10:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mount Penglai

message: "For the Greek goddesses, see Horae" I don't know how to add this to the template. --Wetman 09:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect Hо̄rai has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 04:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Hо̄rai]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Necarne

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20010530123857/http://www.irvineclan.com/necarne.htm, where it is copied from Necarne Castle and the Ulster Lakeland Equestrian Park by Breege McCusker, 1995. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Young Jedi Knights

message: I think putting in book blurbs is breaking copyright rules, but I'm not really sure. So, should we really be putting in book blurbs or not? Weirdy 09:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If nothing else, it would probably be more informative to at least elaborate on the blurbs. – Mipadi 18:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Blurbs
Talk:Monea castle

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. eviolite (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Seathwaite Fell

message: ... was just shown on Triple J's radio show on ABC TV. Hopefully it won't get vandalised with references to pencils. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 13:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article 

message: I suspect that the absence of an article about the Seathwaite hamlet has led other article authors to link (erroneosuly) to this article.  In order to provide an article more appropriate to link to I think the following two might be helpful.  Could someone more familiar with English geography please look these over and comment on them before I submit them to WP:AFC?  Thak you.  The proposed new article names are taken from the Seathwaite disambiguation page:
: From the right hand map shown at the List of Parliamentary constituencies in Cumbria article I think that the hamlet will lie within the Copeland (UK Parliament constituency) after the United Kingdom general election, 2009/10 and I have added that to the Infbox for the proposed hamlet article.  The next step in preparing these articles may be to request a deletion of the redirect. 67.86.73.252 (talk) 23:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please discuss and improve the new Seathwaite, Allerdale article at that article and not on this article about the nearby Fell.  This remaining proposal for the village article has not yet been submitted (but will be soon): 67.86.73.252 (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please discuss and improve the new Seathwaite, South Lakeland article at that article and not here. I have removed the proposals from this Talk page so as to reduce geographic coordinate confusion.  67.86.73.252 (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Looks fine to me, I think it is wrong that Seathwaite, Borrowdale redirects to Seathwaite Fell, So I would say definately change it (in my opinion). Regards Mick Knapton (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for checking these proposals.  I have started the discussion over at WP:RFD and I have posted a note at User:Yohan euan o4/Indian Wells (who set up the redirect in January 2008).  67.86.73.252 (talk) 20:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apparently I was mistaken in thinking that the redirect had to be deleted before the creation of the new Seathwaite, Allerdale article.  In fact the history for the page lists Yohan euan o4's original redirect, which is nice I think.  I'll propose the village article soon then remove it from this Fell discussion page after that. 67.86.73.252 (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposals for starting new <strike>hamlet</strike> (<small>done</small>) and <strike>village</strike> (<small>done</small>) articles
Talk:Xebec (studio)

message: This article is written more like a press release, probably because it is cited to nothing but press releases.  It is also a new company that appears to have acquired the assets and notability of a now defunct company; however, it is a group company of Bandai Namco Holdings which may be where the article needs to be redirected.  I'll try to check back in a couple of days and see if anything has changed to make it notable as a stand alone.  Atsme Talk 📧 03:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press release
Talk:The Great Yokai War

message: I deleted a paragraph that amounted to a user's review of the movie. It was obviously not from a NPOV (it showcased the user's negative view of the film, pointing out his/her dissatisfaction with the lead's performance, etc) and was therefore against Wikipedia's policies.  Referencing negative reviews for a movie (citing the source) is fine; providing one's own unpublished review of a movie is not. Monsieurxander 11:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No subject

message: I've removed 'horror' from the introduction because The Great Yokai War is not a horror film. It's a straightforward fantasy film for children. 0zero9nine (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horror
Talk:Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast

message: I have removed the line referring to the RFH, where its heathside location is compared to that of the RVH as another example of late Victorian teaching hospitals being sited outside of the crowded inner cities. The site referred to was not occupied by the RFH until 1974 when the current building was opened, on the site of the former small, local Hampstead General Hospital in Pond Street. The original RFH was previously located a couple of miles towards the centre of London in Grays Inn Road. Plutonium27 (talk) 05:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison of location to [[Royal Free Hospital]], London 
Talk:Akaname

message: So ... this is what exactly? Because it doesn't look like ... you know, actual research. Just saying, before I start deleting ... it gets a bit tiring, people, trying to see what has actual historical Japanese relevance and what got put here by some 13 year old because it once appeared in an InuYasha episode.  Duende-Poetry (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Obakemono Project?
Talk:Bonamargy Friary

message: As on the Ballycastle, County Antrim  page, I am concerned that the "notes" by Hugh A. Boyd could be a copyright violation, so have deleted them until that can be ascertained. --Kathryn NicDhàna 06:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bangor Abbey

message: See the Catholic ency. ref. on the article page. Disambiguation is required to sort the two abbeys out. Enjoy.Stormbay 22:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh Abbey of Bangor 