lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Generalized quantifier

message: I was reading recently in the "Type_theory" section of the version or "revision" of this article which is currently the most recent one ... namely, the 22:10, 4 April 2022‎ version or "revision" of this article. 
Some of the use of language there struck me as being unrigorous in a way that might be acceptable in some contexts, but is probably not appropriate in an article whose "Talk:" page says (in part)This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics
For one example, there is a bullet item that says:
*Expressions of type t denote a truth value, usually rendered as the set \{0,1\}, where 0 stands for "false" and 1 stands for "true".   Examples of expressions that are sometimes said to be of type t are sentences or propositions.
In my opinion, what it should say (and what would be true) would be [more like] 
*An expression of type t has a truth value, which is an element of the set \{0,1\}, where 0 stands for (or "means") "false" and 1 means "true". Some examples of expressions that are considered to "have" a truth value of that kind (or, "of that type" ... that is, of the type t) are: sentences and propositions.
There might (also) be some other places in that section of this article  with [similar or 'analogous' instances of having] some "room for improvement".
This (the above "bullet item" example) is just one example. 
I was almost about to "be bold" and just go edit the article to insert this change (the above mentioned change). However, ... I thought it might be better to elicit some comments first. 
: *** Any advice or other comments would be appreciated. *** 
 Mike Schwartz (talk) 18:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for the "[[Generalized_quantifier#Type_theory|Type theory]]" section
Talk:MV Tricolor

message: The article mentions the various collisions, and later says "after the ship had sunk" but it is not clear at what point the ship sank. Looking at the BBC article, it seems that it sank within 90 minutes of the first collision, in shallow waters (hence why other ships were then able to also collide, and why the crew was safe). This information should be mentioned, otherwise the article is confusing.   66.108.185.50 23:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sinking of the ship needs clarifying 

message: There are no requirement for mention of Thales Navigation within this webpage... it is purely there for self gratification for the company and is of no interest or relevance to the original article about the Tricolor itself. Should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.105.164.226 (talk) 01:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thales Navigation mentioning is not required. 

message: I believe this is the archive location of the original reference number 3, detailing litigation regarding the collision.
http://archive.onlinedmc.co.uk/in_re_otal_investments_-_m_v_kariba.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.66.142 (talk) 14:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Link should be updated 
Talk:The Wedding Present

message: I've started a stub for The Ukrainians. —Michael Z. 2006-11-16 19:40 Z
the link for the saturnalia album links to the album of a different band. you might wish to fix this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.124.184 (talk) 19:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Ukranians

message: I've started a separate article for the discography, it isn't in mainspace yet, but feel free to help out - it's at User:Dylanfromthenorth/The Wedding Present discography. Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for discography
Talk:List of Sacramento writers

message: Mark Twain never lived in Sacramento! [posted by 65.98.196.2: 19:41, 16 November 2006]
: I don't know about that, but the page is for writers with "ties to Sacramento". Twain was a writer for the Sacramento Union in 1866. Louche 00:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mark Twain

message: The three articles: List of Sacramento writers, List of Sacramento sports figures, and List of Sacramento entertainers are excessive, especially when New York and San Francisco only have one article (List of people from New York City and List of people from San Francisco). The three articles have been merged into one article, List of people from Sacramento.
If someone could help clean it up and organize it for accuracy with properly cited sources, that'd be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheezesatzu (talk • contribs) 19:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd better rethink the undiscussed merge to List of people from Sacramento. As pointed out above (and in the article), this is a list of writers who have written about or lived in Sacramento, only a few of whom are from Sacramento. There are in fact a similar List of San Francisco Bay Area writers and a bewildering abundance of NY related pages including :Category:Novels set in New York City. It would be better to develop this page by adding explanations of the 'ties'. Sparafucil (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging excessive notable people articles
Talk:Why–because analysis

message: The article features an interesting Partial Why–because graph of the capsizing of the Herald of Free Enterprise, with rectangles, ovals, hexagons, and diamond shapes.  Presumably these shapes should mean something, perhaps categorizing a given event's type of cause, (e.g. necessary, sufficient, contributing, or something...), but there's no explanation of what a given shape means.  
The single reference URL to Analysing Aviation Accidents Using WB-Analysis - an Application of Multimodal Reasoning does not include this graph and is therefore no aid in deciphering these shape meanings. AC (talk) 16:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do the Why-because graph shapes mean?
Talk:Argument from marginal cases

message: Two things to do for this page: Daniel Dombrowski's Babies and Beasts cites the person who originally articulated the Argument From Marginal Cases (at least in modern times in the West), and that should be noted here.  Also, something should be mentioned in articles about animal liberation philosophy that links to this page.  Thanks for creating this page.  -Unnyn 19:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2006

message: :Its proponents hold that if animals do not have direct moral status due to their lack of rationality or other psychic ability, then neither do other members of society such as infants, the senile, the comatose, and the cognitively disabled, since there is no known ability that those marginal-case humans have that other animals lack.
I changed this second sentence of the article, because if one expresses the argument in this way, one should not wonder if one is opposed by slippery-slope-arguments. With the argument from marginal cases, one does certainly NOT want to prove that marginal case humans lack a moral status, but that if they do, which is accepted by the majority of people, then animals do, too. What use would it have for a philosopher of animal rights to prove that animals don't have a moral status?
My English isn't as good as it used to be, so if I accidentally changed the meaning of the sentence, please correct my mistakes. Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.51.168.178 (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slippery Slope
Talk:Nusku

message: Every god is a dingir and all gods are dingir dingir. Nusku was the light and fire god in Babylonia and Assyria. Later on he was confused with Girru or also called Gibil. Nusku was used to represent all fire; both useful and devastating.
He is thought to be the son of many people: Anu the god of the heavens, Enlil the god of the earth, and Sin the god of the moon. Nusku is teamed and friends with Ea the god of water, the purifier.
He was also thought of the god of civilization in general because of all of what people do with fire. Nusku is the connection between gods and people since all offerings are given to the heavens by burning it. There are many places to worship Nusku in Babylonia and Assyria. He is also worshipped in more symbolic form than the other gods. He is not in any certain place in the heavens.
This may have more info!
Gerra developed into Gibil. Is Girru, then, the same as Gerra? T@nn 17:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kennelly

message: can some one plese change this fome a disambiguation page to a normal one —Preceding unsigned comment added by JosephK19 (talk • contribs) 
:Please note that I reverted your changes, as I don't feel there is any need to mention names already mentioned under the surname list here. Please see the original conversion of the page. Michaelas10 (Talk) 19:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:County Route 97 (Suffolk County, New York)

message: It should be noted that sections of Nicoll's Road were built from north to south, hence the north-to-south description of the road. ----DanTD (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, after all these years, I finally added a route description closer to the standards of Wikipedia US Roads. Can we remove this tag from the "To Do" list? ----DanTD (talk) 02:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffolk CR 97 was built from North to South 
Talk:Worm (Kamen Rider)

message: Could someone get a screenie of a Native Worm? Thanks -- Floria L 19:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Native image

message: There is NO need to split up the article like that. Its more encyclopedic to keep the species list together, and just discuss the major worms up top. The Species list should not be split, as it is just a SPECIES LIST. Not a group of Worms, not a category. LIST. Floria L 05:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Constant edits

message: From the Gitai book Grandis Worm
97.96.119.175 (talk) 18:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Worm Design
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Ireland

message: Information for Latvia and Indonesia is missing, as the foreignaffairs site is returning a blank page for those entries. I'm fairly certain Latvia has an Irish embassy because they're in the EU, and the government has a policy of having embassies in all the EU member states. No clue about Indonesia though... Demiurge 19:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No Irish Embassy in Indonesia, but there is one in Riga (http://www.dfa.ie/home/index.aspx?id=5484).  Not every EU state has an embassy in every other EU state.  Kransky 08:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 

message: Should the Irish Government Secretariat in Belfast be added to this list? Although its not a consulate, it is a Irish DFA office that is similar to the other diplomatic missions here and included on their website here. Its listing here may include a link to the British–Irish Intergovernmental Conference presumably?     (The office's Twitter account for reference) --Gimelthedog (talk) 21:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @CarlTheCoincleaner Can you explain why you reverted my edit? The Secretariat offices are missions of the DFA so I think they would qualify to be here? As an alternate was of including them maybe we could add a "Non-consular Missions" section for the two offices rather than including it under Europe? --Gimelthedog (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Government Secretariat in Belfast
Talk:Code snippets

message: Needs to be generalized. Surely Microsoft isn't the first to come up with this idea.  --Uncle Ed 19:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It did. Thanks!! :-) --Uncle Ed 21:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I think this should be merged into Snippet (programming). Any comments or objections? PeterL 03:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Snippet (programming)
Talk:Stoemp

message: This page has permission to use copyright material by me, Jeannie Bastian. I, Jeannie Bastian, am the author of the original document used as a reference and created this entry myself.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chicon"
:Permission for Wikipedia to use the text is unfortunately not enough. You'll need to give permission for the information o be released under the GFDL, for anyone to copy, modify, distribute, or sell. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 14:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section of this talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'm guessing this is the same as Stamppot - which would be the better one to merge to?  Is this a Flemish/Dutch difference? FlagSteward 20:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Limitanei

message: }}
I've read an article that wrote that Limitanei were formed out of peasants-soldiers.
I think the term peasant-soldiers is horribly wrong , though there's some truth in it. He might have been talking about germanic tribes that joined the army. This is just a thought not a certenty. A more modest way of talking about this issue would be to describe these armies as man not being Roman by origin. Thus probably not owning the Roman Citizen rights.
The term was found in: Roman Gold and Development of the Early Germanic Kingdoms (ed.) Bente Magnus 2001 Almqvist & wiksell international , stockholm sweden
:*This is a good point please include it into the article, this article is a mess an really needs cleaned up, im going to add a needed citation template and such. thanks ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 14:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

message: If they have mail armor, then they aren't light infantry. Ananiujitha (talk) 03:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equipment contradiction 

message: * We need more and better sources.
* It would help if someone with access to Luttwak's works on the Roman and Byzantine armies can identify, update, and reference the claims associated with his theories.
* It would help to include more sources on the Western limitanei, and any similar organizations in the successor states. Ananiujitha (talk) 18:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do 

message: Strobel's work seems to prove that the limitanei weren't supposed to be farmer-soldiers at least until after 458. Ananiujitha (talk) 23:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farmer-Soldiers? 

message: The Roman military articles separate the Roman army, and Roman navy, but that may be a modern imposition and may not reflect the ancient structure of the late Roman military. What to do? Ananiujitha (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The limitanei included river flotillas 

message: I don't have a copy of his book. According to the article, he thought the limitanei operated together with "provincial field armies." But the limitanei were the provincial [border] armies. Is he saying the limitanei operated with regional [diocese or multiple dioceses] field armies? Is he assuming there is an intermediate category? Or what? Ananiujitha (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone please clear up Luttwak's theories?
Talk:Port (computer networking)

message: added a  tag to the article without leaving an edit summary or (ironically) any other context to help us understand the issue. We've just finished a round of improvement to the lead. Did we make things worse? Can we get more information about this problem? ~Kvng (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reviewed the lead and can't see a problem there. We've not heard back from . I've removed the tag. ~Kvng (talk) 23:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Context
Talk:Flooding (computer networking)

message: If any ideas of flooding algorithm to some extend are used in TCP or UDP, please specify to what extend they are used and how. I believe some ideas of flooding algorithm are in fact used in TCP and UDP and it would be good to know the contrubution of this algorithm for most common protocols.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.3.139.2 (talk) 18:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are any ideas of this algorithm used in TCP/IP or UDP 

message: This is basically the same thing as Flooding_algorithm, which is a much more complete article. L3prador (talk) 04:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved all network-specific content from Flooding algorithm to here. --Kvng (talk) 15:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I went ahead and removed the cleanup tag after fixing (what I believe to be) all the grammar and spelling mistakes. I also fixed the formatting to make it more consistent with Wikipedia's guidelines. I tried to reference Ping floods and Denial of service attacks, but I realize this whole article could use some more material, hence the expert tag. Maura Dailey 20:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other

message: The second animation is working only if you watch the GIF file directly, and not from the actual article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ore4444 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated GIF 

message: Is this distinct enough from flood search routing to keep separate articles for both? The latter article seems to be primarily concerned with telephony rather than datacomm.--Srleffler (talk) 03:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Flood search routing
Talk:Harriet Beecher Stowe House (Cincinnati, Ohio)

message: This article has some issues with grammar and syntax, such as the first sentence: 
:"The Harriet Beecher Stowe House was once the residence of Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896), she was the influential antislavery author who wrote Uncle Tom's Cabin." 
While this is not an incredibly grievous infraction, it and a few other sentences do stand out as not being overly well-written, and I think the whole article could use some copy-editing- Patrolmanno9 00:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Preferred provider organization

message: * Merge. I'm no expert but I recommend merging because they seem very similar. In fact, the article for Participating provider option (what is being considered for merging) says in the second paragraph, "A PPO or Preferred Provider Organization" They sound interchangeable as terms. --Guroadrunner 20:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding merging

message: This page needs sources. It reads more like a response paper for a college assignment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.209.46 (talk) 21:11, 24 April 2007
:the whole EPO section makes a lot of claims against EPO's without a single cite. I am going to edit it down a lot.harlock_jds (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs sources

message: I added the  tag to the following sentence:  It is unclear what years "the past decade" refers to, and I can't clarify that myself. - Firefeather (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When tag: "PPOs have gained popularity in the past decade" 

message: "PPOs can also contract with one another to strengthen their position in certain geographic areas without forming new relationships directly with providers. This will be mutually beneficial in theory, as the insurer will be billed at a reduced rate when its insureds utilize the services of the 'preferred' provider and the provider will see an increase in its business as almost all and or insureds in the organization will use only providers who are members"
I have personally found catheters, oxygen tanks, manual wheelchairs and therapy services for sale outside of my insurance company's preferred provider networks for less than 10 cents on the dollar. This is obviously either price gouging or price fixing - considering I would have to pay out of pocket If I order goods and services outside the network without pre-approval.
This can't be legal. How is it that nobody has looked into PPO's and a link to unnatural monopolies? 68.115.35.110 (talk) 08:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential for abuse
Talk:One Cold Winter's Night

message: Should there be a separate article for both the CD and the DVD, or should all the information be found here? This because there is currently no page or whatsoever about the DVD. Cristan 20:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be here on the same page in its own infobox (yes another) and maybe under a level 1 header. −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  14:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles
Talk:Open the Door, Richard!

message: Guy Chookoorian performed this song translated in his native Armenian on the CD Guy Chookoorian Does His Hits.
:This was unreferenced so I move it here. When a reference is provided it can go back into the article. –Mattisse (Talk) 01:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced line move here 

message: The main title header has been moved from Open the Door, Richard to Open the Door, Richard! on the basis of the exclamation point's depiction within the image of the sheet music cover appended to the article's infobox as well as on the basis of the reproduction of the label pasted onto the record, as seen here. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Exclamation point
Talk:Daley Bicentennial Plaza

message: Actually from what I understand, as part of the Grant Park "parking" deal with Morgan Stanley, there will no longer be a Daley Bicentenial (sp?) Plaza. It will be torn down as part of the planned Monro East Garage reconstruction (2-3 year project) and Morgan Stanley is not obligated to rebuild it. ( http://blog.new-eastside.com )
IMHO, this is a serious topic worthy of it's own page.
Eric
:The article is currently only four sentences long. Once the three sentences that are copied directly from the Chicago Park District are removed (as they have to be for copyright reasons), there will be only one sentence left. This subject could be much better handled in context, i.e. as pert of the Grant Park article. —JeremyA 23:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Heracleidae

message: I think that there should be more distiction drawn between what is myth and what is history in this article. Does anyone else agree? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alpha Mithras (talk • contribs) 23:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth/Reality 