Talk:Little Big Adventure

message: The article says: "The isometric view used in the game was inspired by an old game named Alien9." I wonder if you mean Alien 8? However, I don't know if it is worth mentioning as there were loads of isometric games in the same style. Unless the developers specifically mentioned that game somewhere, and if so maybe the source could be quoted? Pelago 14:48, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alien9?

message: I have proposed merging the article Emerald moon into this article because it does not warrent its own article. It said to see more about this game, so it should be here. If there is no objections, I or someone can merge the article. -Royalguard11Talk 18:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge 

message: I've just finished LBA n-th time and I'm sure that the most powerful attack with sabre is in Agressive mode, NOT in athletic mode. In athletic mode Twinsen mostly jump backward and forward, in agressive mode he is mostly attacking enemies.
MichuNeo, 87.205.35.77 16:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sabre most powerful attack

message: Quote from trivia: "The save system in LBA was much criticized for its arcane and confusing interface. Rather than a simple load and save, the autosave feature saves the game to the same save file/slot. In order to restore a previously saved game, player must first manually copy the saved game to the current save file/slot and reload the current game to continue."
Is it just me or does this not reflect very well how the autosave was meant to be used in the first place? It works quite well actually, and the copying trick is only necessary in case, say, you want to use a friend's savegame. Perhaps this portion should be edited? --Wacko 23:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten this part and integrated it into the main article, see this diff. --Wacko 09:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Arcane and confusing interface"? (about autosave)

message: I understand that as a fan of this game, my opinion is probably considered a bit biased, but I can't help but disagree with the line "The quality of voice acting is generally regarded as being quite poor"
I still own the game to this day, and I think the voice acting is fine, a little "cartoonish" but still good quality and well done.
I'd like to propose a more neutral phrase to take the place of what I consider to be weasel words, something such as: "The voice acting, albeit cartoonish, was crisp, clear and impressed players"
Surely the phrase that you suggested in itself is full of Bias, A neutral phrase would be "Voice acting was still in its infancy when this game was created and as such may not compare in certain ways to modern games, it is open to interpretation." - But even that is wrong and shouldn't be in a Wikipedia article, ideally the whole line shouldn't exist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.16.9 (talk) 15:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Quality of voice acting"

message: The section Background copies an entire quote from the game. Isn't this a copyright violation? (Not to mention that this quote isn't very helpful in the article...) Morshem (talk) 03:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: Both LBA 1 and LBA 2 articles were recently vandalized by user Eik Corell. I reverted the changes and hope it won't happen again. OutOfTimer Wanna chat? 05:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks to me he was cleaning up the articles in good faith? Removing the trivial and game guide information which has no place in an encyclopaedia. Rehevkor ✉ 14:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He should've cleanedup the article - not DELETE sections that he didn't like. He destroyed more than half of our work and that's vandalizm to me. Check out his user talk page to see several people complaining about his behaviour. However, don't worry as I have this article on the list of my priorities and I'm going to clean it up within the next few weeks. OutOfTimer Wanna chat? 23:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to me, like Rehevkor is a sock-puppet of Eik Corell, which means his actions definitely stink of vandalism.  - 212.235.186.231 (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me? Agreeing with someone is sockpuppeting? Who knew. Rehevkor ✉ 19:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I don't have any sockpuppets. Eik Corell (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Unsourced? It doesn't need sources. Check the Magicball Network Forums, there's the discussion about the versions there. ;)  - OBrasilo (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is problematic, because discussion forums are not considered reliable sources.Eik Corell (talk) 16:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm trying to, but the guy keeps reverting. I did post here, but he doesn't bother even to read. He keeps removing the table instead of just adding the fact (citation needed) template to it.  - OBrasilo (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

text: You're assuming bad faith here, Eik Corell's edits are in no way vandalism. If you really do think we're sockpuppets I suggest you go to the good people at sockpuppet investigations and waste their time. Oh, and OBrasilo violated the 3RR rule first. Rehevkor ✉ 00:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you violated the rule, not me. And anyway, at least 3 of us are for keeping the Versions table in the article. Only two of you are for removing it. Maybe you should stop taking your WP:OWN stance on the article, and grow up, and leave it alone. Neither you, nor Eik Corell, have posted the table here in the talk page, and broken it down, explaining version per version, why they must go. Instead, you two kept immaturely reverting my reverts, using a Wikipedia guideline as an excuse, and basically going "our way, or the highway". The article stood, as it did, for years, and now it won't change just because two people decided so, against consensus, at that. Actually, you people haven't even gotten a consensus first. The article stood one way for years, no-one changed them, then you changed them, and people revert your changes - this should be a clear sign, that people don't like your changes. So why not behave like mature men, and cease, and desist, rather, than insisting on your changes?  - OBrasilo (talk) 16:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We have given you valid reasons for not including it, policy and guidelines, the only reason you have given is that it's "worth it". And yes, you reverted five time in a 24 hour period. I reverted twice. You have been given the chance to improve the article and table to Wikipedia's standards, but all you have done is argue semantics, cry vandalism and assume bad faith. Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information, and if you want your contributions to stay they have to conform, when you submit anything here you submit it to the scrutiny of other editors (see that disclaimer below the edit window?) Rehevkor ✉ 16:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If I can't put the versions here, then where do I write them? I'm all ears, please tell me.  - OBrasilo (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You could port them over to Encyclopedia Twinsunica. That wiki specializes in exactly this type of stuff, and it would be appropriate there. Eik Corell (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalizm 

message: I don't think this is a Windows game. I'll remove it from the Windows games category. 2fort5r (talk) 08:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember having to boot into DOS to run it on Win 95, but it could have run on 3.1 I believe Rehevkor ✉ 12:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This was probably added in reference to something called LbaWin which allows the game to run in a Windows environment. Eik Corell 12:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows 

message: Hereby, I formally apologize to Eik Corell, and Rehevkor, for my bad behavior until now. I promise I'll stop pushing my Versions table into this aritcle. I have decided to copy it onto my personal website about these games, The Island CX, and leave it there. It has more relevance there, than it has here.  - OBrasilo (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formal apology for my bad behavior 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Little Big Adventure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071110004816/http://www.rpgtown.com/index.php?page=music_vachey to http://www.rpgtown.com/index.php?page=music_vachey
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified