lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shire of Winton

message: In 1879 all of the state was covered by municipalities and divisions. Therefore the creation of Winton in 1886 must have excised territory from another division. Normally the Qld Govt Gazette contains a group of proclamations, one for the new division and the others amending the boundaries of existing divisions reflecting the introduction of the new one. However, Winton's proclamation doesn't have any accompanying proclamations with boundary changes, so where did it come from? I am guessing it might be Aramac Division from this 1880 newspaper article, although maybe you can interpret it as saying it was in Diamantina Division. Kerry (talk) 04:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did Winton Division get excised from?
Talk:Death on Deadline

message: Do we really need this section? All it is is a recapitualtion of all the clues, and it doesm't seem to fit in, stylewise, anyway. While I have not read each article dealing with a Nero Wolfe novel, I don't recall any spoliers as who the murderer is like this one has.Hx823 (talk) 22:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denouement
Talk:Death Sentence (novel)

message: Is there any real connection between the bok and the film ? -- Beardo (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has the writer of this article actually read the book?
Because Death Wish II does not follow the plot of the book.86.46.40.189 (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Death Wish II (1981) follows some of the plot, but is set in L.A."

message: Badly written, hard to follow, please fix up. ELSchissel (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation section
Talk:Nemes

message: That's what those things are called? Nemes? Wow, I didn't know.
--Tophthemetalbender (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any information on how these were made? Sephiroth storm (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  made?
Talk:Legal treatise

message: I moved the list of treatises to List of treatises, since it was not a disambiguation of the article title "Treatise".  Since the dictionary definition wasn't enough for an article, I've redirected this to Tract (literature). It could be made into a separate article by expanding it, but an earlier comment now on Talk:List of treatises gave me the impression that expansion was unlikely.  The article that could have been disambiguated (but wasn't on the list), Treatise (music), is linked from a hatnote on the Tract (literature) article. -- JHunterJ 12:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that I agree with this redirect. The tract article, which privileges religious tracts, does not really address the genre of the "treatise." Locke's Two Treatises of Government and Some Thoughts Concerning Education, for example, while treatises, are not the kinds of documents addressed in this article, but whenever someone links "treatise" in those articles, users are sent here. Awadewit 22:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Awadewit, I agree. Tract and treatise are not the same thing. The redirect should be removed. --RayBirks 00:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know how to do that? I am unfamiliar with the process. Awadewit 00:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The redirect can just be edited here and replaced with an article about treatise instead, but the article should be an encyclopedic entry about treatise (similar in structure to the tract article) and not just a list of treatises. Or, if no article should be at Treatise until that article can be written, it could be nominated at WP:RfD -- JHunterJ 12:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List, dab, redirect?
Talk:Owly

message: Owly is awesome! but Owlii is a parody of Owly made by SNBMyoutube  —Preceding unsigned comment added by XXXNXXXMXXX (talk • contribs) 00:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yah! 
Talk:Crystal Tipps and Alistair

message: "... was a 50-episode ..."
* "Is", surely? Isn't Wikipedia policy to treat programmes not on their original run as extant? (You never know what cable or satellite channels might be showing them.)
:* "50-episode" makes it sound like a serial. Each programme had a separate story. — Paul G 12:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * 50 episode sounds fine to me, as that’s a common term for a single “unit” (for want of a better word) of any series, in UK English at least; in fact “episodic” is used to make a distinction with “serial” TV. No, what confuses me is the assertion that “Each of the 50 episodes lasted five-minutes, including a 20-minute Christmas special”. Is the Christmas Special four 5 minute episodes back-to-back, are there fifty 5 minute episodes and a 20 minute Christmas Special, or should it be “There are 49 episodes of 5 minutes duration, and one Christmas Special of 20 minutes”? Jock123 (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I just found this site which says that it was 50 episodes and the 20 minute special http://www.toonhound.com/crystaltipps.htm If anyone can coroborate that, the line could be amended. Jock123 (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Something for the Weekend

message: The article says of the phrase "Something for the weekend" that, "the first known recorded example is from a sketch by the Monty Python comedy team on a 1972 record." The text "1972 record" links to Let's Make Up And Be Friendly by the Bonzo Dog Band. 
As far as I know there is no "Let's Make Up And Be Friendly" by "the Monty Python comedy team" so I believe this is referring either to the wrong comedy team or to the wrong record ... but I don't know which. I have tagged the line "verification needed".
Brother Francis 12:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The link should be to Monty Python's Previous Record. There might need to be a separate entry for this in the list? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to Monty Python record

message: why in the world would barbers offer condoms?! Mathmo Talk 06:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbers
Talk:Everyman (novel)

message: Everyman is a novel, not a novella.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.1.12.122 (talk) 02:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel
Talk:1st GAM: Amai Yuwaku

message: خدمات الباك لينك لتحسين أداء موقعك و تصدر محركات البحث و تحسين ترتيب المواقع في نتائج محركات البحث جوجل
هل تعاني من كثرة تحديثات جوجل المستمرة وعدم أرشفة موقعك؟
و دائمًا ما تفعل ما تستطيع و لكن دون نتيجة مرضية؟
هل سئمت دفع أموال كثيرة هنا وهناك وبناء الروابط خارجية دون نتيجة مرضية ؟
 
أنت الآن في المكان الصحيح لبناء أفضل باك لينك Backlinks لموقعك من خلال خدمات الباك لينك.
إذا أنت علي أول الخطوات للطريق الصحيح الكثيرون مثلك كانوا مثل وضعك الآن ..
 
أما الآن الوضع تغير كثيرًا للأفضل هل تريد معرفة السبب ؟
 
الباك لدى جوجل الطفل المدلل أو بمثابة توصية المواقع المشهورة، إذا أعطيتها باك لينك بشكل سليم وقوي ترضى عنك وتهتم لأمرك و تجمع موقعك من أوائل المواقع ماذا اذا كان العكس !!!!
 
بالطبع أنت تعرف النتيجة عزيزي الباك لينك القوي المحبب لدى جوجل، يجب أن يكون تحت معايير محددة وإستراتيجية قوية لتجنب كل مشاكل جوجل و تجعلها تنظر إليك نظرة تجعلك سعيد حقاً .
 
مع باك لينك قوي وسليم أنت دائمًا الشخص الفائز بكل تحديثات محركات البحث وخاصة جوجل
ماذا تنتظر…. النتائج في انتظارك راسلنا الآن عبر رقمنا الواتساب لتفاصيل أكثر . 95.153.170.32 (talk) 05:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  خدمات الباك لينك
Talk:First Blood (novel)

message: Restored older version of the article since all sub-sequent versions were written in some horrible sort of Pidgin-Engrish.Kar98 (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Do they speak English in 'What'?

message: What does the title mean in the context of the story? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 11:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: .
Tarap (talk) 18:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't Trautman a captain in the novel ? 

message: The year is wrong. 2A02:C7D:386:C800:25D3:3F79:89A3:E972 (talk) 17:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of film is 1982 not 1972 

message: Is there any information about how many translations of First Blood were actually made? There's definitely more than 26 now, since in 2022 the first Ukrainian translation was published.  Spider Minstrel (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations 

message: I'd like to see THAT as a movie 2003:C1:FF12:2F8:69E7:4E2C:AE3A:A6C5 (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much better story
Talk:Fledgling (Butler novel)

message: --The character section was very informative and well organized with the order. --DrewDrew30 (talk) 18:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: --Purple lover0516 (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you message from ENG103 class--Mozucat (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: --Andyyecua (talk) 18:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: --Mona's mistake (talk) 18:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: ; Thank you for the incite! LajEvelyn (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: --James.johnson21 (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: --Purple lover0516 (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Alrighty then Mazuyuki Eizoku (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Group 1

message: --In the difference as means of survival i like the way you portrayed shory because i though the same of her amnesia she will be able to be the Ina she wanted to be and portray herself so for that reason i think that's a advantage too.  good job
--Nanaqueen (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you, Nanaqueen for saying it was a "good job".--Japanize myself (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you message from ENG103 class--Mozucat (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the comment I'll fix the grammar mistake  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OwenZeph (talk • contribs) 17:53, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you message from ENG103 class--Mozucat (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Thank you @Jordync57 for the feedback.  Humans and Vampires improve because they gain stronger characteristics and lose weaker ones, effectively becoming more like The Other, and thus creating a more compassionate and mutual relationship.  So, I feel that this point was sufficiently explained.  Lagccstudent (talk) 18:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Group 2

message: --Wondrous job! i had no clue where Fledgling came from, now it very clear to me.
--Perhaps a bit more of information on the background, otherwise great job. --Bettercallzaul (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Group 3
Talk:Galatea 2.2

message: I removed a good portion of the article because it's unsourced personal research on the book. As a rule, any such coverage of the book absolutely must be backed up with links to reliable sources that discuss the novel. Even if you are an authoritative source on the author or the subject matter, you must be able to point to where your research has been covered in reliable sources. This just didn't read as overly encyclopedic.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and original research 
Talk:Bongo

message: If you added it, please explain and justify  Bongo the Clown, the 'clown persona' of the American artist Glenn.Sabine's Sunbird  talk 12:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clown 

message: This disambiguation page was marked for cleanup per MoS:DAB. I removed the following entries because they didn't provide any meaningful links to articles that establish the notabiliy of these "Bongos":
* Bongo, Kuririn's Harmony Gold English Dragon Ball name dub from the 1980's.
* Bongo, a fictional Gungan submarine in the movie Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
* Bongo, an alternate version of Kryten in the British sitcom Red Dwarf
– sgeureka t•c 09:03, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Omar Bongo is a surname holder.  Per WP:MOSDAB#Given names or surnames, he goes in a separate section.  Bongo (clown) is not a surname holder, but an article that could have been titled Bongo.  It goes in the main list.  The Bongos are also part of the main list since we're dabbing Bongo and Bongos here. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omar Bongo and The Bongos 

message: Should bongo drums and others in "Entertainment" really be classified as entertainment? Yes, the video game should be in entertainment, but bongo drums and the band should be in "Music", which does not exist yet. --  () 23:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Andrewa (talk) 07:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entertainment?
Talk:Commandos 3: Destination Berlin

message: This is just on the edge of being Start-Class, but there's just not enough content there at the moment. Have a look at the articles here to get an idea of what to include. Expand the reception section or add one of two decent-sized sections and you'll have your Start. To get beyond that, you'll need screenshots, sources and a copyedit (see WP:MOS) as the current prose isn't really of an encyclopedic tone. Hope this helps, Una LagunaTalk 17:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:VG]] assessment 
Talk:Nancy Drew: Girl Detective

message: I think that this series copies Sammy Keyes. Since this series is modern and is written in the first person like Sammy Keyes, I think that is what seems similar. Wow, how could Nancy Drew stoop so low.
69.149.15.90 (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Sammy Keyes vs Nancy Drew?''' 

message: wasn't there a party game, "one step ahead", that was released under the girl detective franchise?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.170.55.91 (talk) 18:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Party game 

message: The frist time I watch the nancy drew movie I feel like girl can do anything that a man can do don't let no one tell you  you can't Rosemarie Martin (talk) 15:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girl power
Talk:Commandos: Strike Force

message: no mention of any formats - there is a ps2 and xbox version as well Machete97 (talk) 15:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  formats 

message: "The game attracted mixed reactions,[1] especially from those coming from fans of the earlier games in the series who see this a massive departure mainly due to the trademark difficulty instead giving way to a game that is much less so."
I tried to edit this sentence, but gave up because I couldn't figure out what it was trying to say. Maybe the author can give it a shot?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.10.138 (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Que? 
Talk:Worms Armageddon

message: In my N64 version, many of the stated customization possibilities )including the map editor) are unavailible. Is this the same for all N64 copies? 81.16.160.34 (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customization: Limited 

message: I suggest moving the article to Worms: Armageddon, as the colon is typically added to titles such as these. SharkD (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. A colon is not used on the official website when referring to the game. Some guy (talk) 09:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

text: More discussion has occured here. SharkD (talk) 01:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename/move article 

message: This article used to have this screenshot, but consensus is to remove the image because it fails WP:NFCC#8, for there has not been a discussion of reviewers describing how the graphics are different from the original's. Actually, there is talk about it now, especially given that IGN described the graphics as "quirky". That said, should the extra screenshots in Elite (video game) be deleted as well because the article does not discuss about reviewers describing the graphics as very different from the original version's? Gamingforfun365 (talk) 16:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Worms Armageddon Game Boy Color screenshot.png 

message: I personally think this is an important one, and should definitely remain the part of the article, omitting it leaves its readers without full and pottentially useful additional information about differences between various releases of the game. The reason for reverting mentioned unreliable sources, but i don't think there are better ones, and instead of removing that section, it should've been left until it gets updated with better source references. Please revert it back.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.203.231 (talk) 22:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of section about controversy and GOG release date
Talk:Worms World Party

message: I noticed shopper was incorrectly labled as "Shoppa".This is not what it is called.I changed it,but if anyone can prove to me that it is called "Shoppa",i will be more than happy to change it back.Mariofan1000 (talk) 13:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoppa = Shopper 

message: I suggest moving the article to Worms: World Party, as the colon is typically added to titles such as these. SharkD (talk) 02:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: More discussion has occured here. SharkD (talk) 01:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename/move article
Talk:Worms 3D

message: I don't advocate trashing this whole article, but, as it is, it's nothing but a crazy-ass advertisement for the game; I wouldn't be surprised to find the whole text has been copied from the game's instruction manual (which would probably be against Wikipedia's rules, anyway).
the game dose have some problems but is actually very enjoyable and it dose not get boring after the first time you beat it. It is also fun to enjoy the online aspects, for they are exstreamly enjoyable.the games that follow the worms saga are one better than the other and i think that Team 17 has done an excellent job on this particular one.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.81.72.11 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a bad start on the Article 

message: i think that if this article had some more screen shots it would be more interesting to the reader!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Worm17 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: needs more pictures=

message: In Article should be weapons like this:
Bazooka Family    	Bazooka      	Homing Missile  	Mortar         	                 	
Grenade Family    	Grenade      	Cluster Bomb    	Gas Canister   	Holy Hand Grenade	Banana Bomb
Sighting Family   	Shotgun      	Uzi             	Petrol Bomb    	Blow Pipe^       	Sticky Bomb^
Hand Family       	Fire Punch   	Baseball Bat    	Viking Axe     	Prod             	
Put Family        	Mine         	Dynamite        	Mega Mine^     	                 	
Animal Family     	Homing Pigeon	Sheep           	Super Sheep    	Old Woman        	Mad Cow
Air Assault Family	Air Strike   	Concrete Donkey^	Lottery Strike^	Doctors Strike^  	
All articles Worms in Wiki use Weapons, see it: Worms Forts: Under Siege, Worms 4: Mayhem, Worms Armageddon. 
Weapons is main in Game!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexBond2 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weapons
Talk:Worms 4: Mayhem

message: Who wrote this stuff? What does it mean?
 
(air strikes, launched is bazooka, thrown is grenade)
 MikeTango 13:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF? 

message: OK, I tagged this one for cleanup; among other things that irk me is the excessive parenthesis usage going on, and sometimes also quite long ones. I think the sentences can often be restructured to avoid the parenthesis altogether, as is common in these cases. It's possible breaking up the sentences more may help accomplish that. There may be other problems in this article too, like the tone used. — Northgrove 12:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged for cleanup 

message: Ok, i've added the 5 secret weapons in bolded text, so they stand out and i've also added 3 external links. The links go to my website - featuring all the effects that the mystery crate does, the official worms 4 forum on my website and a link for members to submit a cheat for the game. Ageofempires 20:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Weapons and External Links 

message: I am surprised that there is no page for Worms 4, which was released not that many months ago. Could anyone help me out, because I don't know how to make a good, new page. :)
Thanks,
— Cameron Johnson (Coolcam6578) Coolcam6578 (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There should be a page for Worms 4 (Mobile version)
Talk:Pata negra

message: Personally I think it would make more sense to merge this article, Pata negra and Jamón ibérico into the main Jamón since in English Jamón only refers to the Spanish dry-cured hams and a single article would give a better overview of the subject. FlagSteward 14:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: The topic Pata negra is almost totally copied and pasted from  which is a subpage of a commercial site mentioned as the external link at the end of the entry and its content is higly questionable considering the info given on  which has broad similarities with Jamón ibérico. In concrete terms, there states: "Included within the Jamón iberico classification is the idea of Pata Negra, but this in itself is not a sign of quality. as it merely indicates the quantity of keratin on the hoof. In truth Pata Negra is a popular and advertising term rather than a true category as there are lower quality jamones de pata negra and higher quality jamones ibericos which don’t have a pata negra. It has recently been banned to avoid such confusion."
If the above statement is valid,the entry Pata negra should be rewritten or deleted. Keep in mind that the sole "source" of the article is a commercial Web page trying to sell the so called pata negra stuff. And yes, I agree with the merging proposal but a serious content check should be done prior to it.
Neophyrigian (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: May need to be rewritten or deleted