Talk:Big Brother voting history (USA season 7)

message: Shouldn't this article be called Big Brother (USA season 7) nominations table? -- 9cds(talk) 17:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. Since the US version uses different rules, and the housemates (houseguests) do not nominate, why call it a nomination table? The houseguests vote, and that's why it's called voting history. Hope that helps! Geoking66 19:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, right. Thanks for clearing it up. -- 9cds(talk) 19:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: He earned a spot on the jury. As will every other evicted houseguest from here on in. FireSpike 02:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but there needs to be a 'results' column for that. See Big Brother voting history (USA season 6) for an example. --Mr. Brown 02:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marcellas should have a blank at the end column 

message: Why has the twist/notes row been taken out and replaced with small numbers? Look at the UK nominations tables, they use a twist row. Geoking66 01:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it incredibly funny that you complain the summary table on the main page is too cluttered, and when I add footnotes to the voting history to make it less cluttered, you add clutter! You would think that less clutter, i.e. end notes, would be better than a "See Note 1", "See Note 2", etc. Just an observation! However, you're right, and they do use a twist row, perhaps I should've checked it before making the voting history table less cluttered. --Mr. Brown 21:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't clutter. It's a way of making notes a little more obvious. In the table in the article, according to WP:BIGBRO, information should be restricted and not cluttered. This is a detailed table - its own article. Geoking66 01:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers, not twist 

message: Currently, Note 4 says "During the sixth week, the houseguests could win the Coup d'Etat power - a right to overthrow the Head of Household on a moments notice on eviction night, and nominate two other houseguests. Mike 'Boogie' won this power, and on Day 48, Mike 'Boogie' lost his Coup d'Etat power by discussing its function with other houseguests."  The televised show mentioned none of this, and given how big of a deal this "big twist" was, I think they would have if it had actually happened.  In the show itself, though, Mike said that the Cd'E power expired when he became HOH for the third of the three evictions it was planned to last for.
So, what really happened?  Did people see this on the live feeds, but CBS covered it up?  Or was this a joke entry that never got reverted?
--Psiphiorg 15:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coup d'Etat, lost or expired? 

message: Is it just me, or has this table become very complicated an ugly? I know that all of the other Big Brother voting tables (with the exception of seasons 6 and 1) and formatted this way, sans "Jury Status" column. Can we just get rid of the "Nominated" boxes for evicted houseguests? Its obvious that they were nominated, because they were evicted, hence its a moot point. --Mr. Brown 05:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complicated & Ugly