lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cariboo camels

message: Pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.177.156.156 (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathetic Article!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

message: Wonderful article; my favorite on Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.207.147 (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Wikipedia article ever 
Talk:Adelaide Festival of Ideas

message: Because it's not confirmed yet, I'm not modifying the article yet, but it is hoped to return in 2016, "owned" by Greg Mackie again: 
Mark Hurd (talk) 05:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hopefully to return in 2016 

message: I've just reinstated the COI tag to highlight the major revision of the article in August 2016 by User:Iansnib (who had stated in his first edit summary "I am on the Board of AFOI Inc and have had a major role in running the AFOI since 2009") - see the discussion on his talkpage that took place then. In particular, this edit removed sourced content. I've also personally spoken with Greg Mackie (whom I've met on a number of occasions in his role as CEO of the  History Trust of South Australia) about this, and he's happy to acknowledge that others also played leading roles in getting the festival established. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 22:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicts of interest
Talk:Monchique Islet

message: «Between the Monchique Islet and America theres is nothing else than the Atlantic Ocean.» Hmm, Bermuda? 82.155.79.187 11:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you're right, though Bermuda does not belong to Europe and lies a long way to the Southwest of Azores. Perhaps that sentence should be deleted? JBarreto 15:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: According to Wikipedia, Bermuda is "located off the East coast of the United States". JBarreto 16:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bermuda 
Talk:C.B.S. Charleville

message: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia incorporating elements of general encyclopedias, specialized encyclopedias, and almanacs. All articles must follow our no original research policy and strive for accuracy; Wikipedia is not the place to insert personal opinions, experiences, or arguments. Furthermore, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia is not a trivia collection, a soapbox, a vanity publisher, an experiment in anarchy or democracy, or a web directory, nor is Wikipedia a dictionary, a newspaper, or a collection of source documents; these kinds of content should be contributed to the sister projects Wiktionary, Wikinews, and Wikisource, respectively.
 Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, which means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view; presenting each point of view accurately; providing context for any given point of view, so that readers understand whose view the point represents; and presenting no one point of view as "the truth" or "the best view". It means citing verifiable, authoritative sources whenever possible, especially on controversial topics. When a conflict arises as to which version is the most neutral, declare a cool-down period and tag the article as disputed; hammer out details on the talk page and follow dispute resolution.
*Wikipedia welcomes your contributions under these guidelines. Happy editing! --Javit 11:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to the editors of this article 
Talk:Up on the Roof (song)

message: What is the source for the published list of musicians on the Drifters hit recording? In addition to the list here, there is definitely a string section, which takes up the melody half way through the recording. I also dispute that the trombonists were recorded. I can only hear trumpets.
Jiver2 (talk) 15:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicians
Talk:Space Force: Rogue Universe

message: Hmm... Seems in USA the title is Space Force: Rogue Universe but in Europe it will be Spaceforce: Rogue Universe. Or maybe not. Official site is inconsistent... The Merciful 12:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add that SpaceForce: Rogue Universe is made by a Croatian developer, Provox Games. I think they deserve even that, that people know where they are coming from.--89.172.236.85 17:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU vs USA
Talk:Hipped roof

message: Is this dab page really necessary? I don't think it's all that common to call a tented roof a hipped roof, this disambiguation could be accomplished on the article pages with a header template and this page could be redirected to hip roof, like it should be. Any objections to my doing this, I will wait a couple days and then go ahead if no one objects. IvoShandor 12:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Necessary
Talk:Sociaal-Liberale Partij

message: I think the best translation should be "coalition" rather than "cartel" which is used in English for business monopolies. AndrewRT(Talk) 12:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: The FlemishProgressives have chosen a new name: SLP, which stands for Social-Liberal Party.
Can someone change the article ?
.:Dennis:. (talk) 21:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SLP

message: Already Moved by Arkangel lucifer. Parsecboy (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Julia Gray

message: Merging of this article and The Guardian Cycle was suggested in January 2007, and no objections or opinions appeared since. I did the merger into here per silent consensus, as part of the Notability wikiproject. -- Futurano 12:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of content from [[The Guardian Cycle]] 

message: Since there is almost no content here about the individuals behind the pseudonym but much on the books, I am switching the main article name to The Guardian Cycle, and letting Julia Gray be a rediect into it, rather than the other way around. Jvv62 01:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name switch
Talk:Joelson (footballer, born 1983)

message: He is the brother of João Batista Inácio? Matthew_hk tc 07:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he is. --Angelo (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brother

message: Seems José Joelson were more frequently appeared that Joelson José . Matthew_hk tc 17:38, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Senegalese Tirailleurs

message: Fascinating part of history, hope somebody can add detail to the WWI and WWII sections.--68.51.72.144 (talk) 15:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more detail 

message: A paragraph has been added from a BBC article , however:
*The BBC claims 17,000 senegalese tirailleurs "lay dead by the time France fell in June 1940", not for the whole of WWII, not for the free french forces, the BBC is anyway, incorrect, as that's the number of casualties rather than of the dead (Collection « Mémoire et Citoyenneté » #10 p.7).
*The liberation of Paris was not a "parade".
There was a parade after the liberation of Paris and th exclusion of African soldiers is the frequent complaint. After all, they were purposely excluded from that show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:192:8600:1DF0:BC56:70D5:4BF3:EC0A (talk) 02:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See the French or German Wikipedia articles on  le Tata sénégalais.211.225.34.164 (talk) 03:29, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW II & BBC article 

message: ′The usual practice was to bring together battalions of white Colonial Infantry ("les marsouins") and African Tirailleurs into mixed regiments de marche.'
This certainly occurred at Gallipoli, but is there evidence that this was usual practice and not just a one-off? What is the source of this statement? Keith H99 (talk) 16:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tirailleur deployment in WW1
Template talk:Formula One constructors

message: The name "constructor" is misleading because a F1 constructor is the combination of car manufacturer and engine manufacturer, e.g. Williams is a car manufacturer and Williams-Toyota is a constructor. This a general problem at the en wiki and because it's is frequently read, people may think it's correct. The official http://www.formula1.com/ is using the word "team" which is better, but it's historically not the same. 
The discussion above moved to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Formula_One#Constructors --Rosp (talk) 08:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I've changed the link text for Haas Lola from "Haas" to "Haas/Lola". I accept The359's point that Embassy Hill is just listed as "Hill", and agree that "Haas/Beatrice" is inappropriate. However, I don't think the cars were ever referred to as just "Haas"es. I'd also be happy with "Haas Lola" (i.e. with a space instead of the slash). DH85868993 (talk) 07:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haas Lola 

message: Do the current 2009 constructors need to be repeated in the 2010 part? The 2010 bit is only there so that Campos, Manor and USF1 were included in the template so that it was easy to navigate (seeing as that's kind of the point in templates) between them. - mspete93 [talk] 11:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no knowledge on the topic, but at a glance that looks to be reasonable - it's kind of silly to duplicate information that's already there.  The header would have to be changed, I think, to something like "Additional 2010 Participants" or the like, to make sure it's implied that the regular 2009 crew is there as well.  Maybe. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 14:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The header used to be something like 'Confirmed New Constructors (2010)'. If I'd noticed the change when it happened I would have immediately reverted it. - mspete93 [talk] 14:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree. DH85868993 (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well - mspete93 [talk] 15:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 

message: Mercedes aren't a new constructor of 2010, are they? It's just new owners of an existing team. It's still Brawn, just not named Brawn anymore. --Chrill (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but can you come up with a better way of doing it? Nothing drastic, it's only a short term thing. - mspete93 [talk] 21:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mercedes
Talk:Percent for art

message: I changed the format of this article's headlines to match other articles, and believe it or not,only then did I notice that this is really only a draft article.  A lot of these things are just notes.  I don't know enough to fill it out -- I was just dealing with the format.  Oh, and I categorized it. Artemis-Arethusa 12:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed Format
Talk:University of Ioannina

message: I have removed the following statements, which I consider to be POV-pushing. Prior to being removed, both statements had been flagged as uncited for 2 months. Feel free to re-insert the statements, if there are references from verifiable sources:
*"It is one of the best and most quickly-developing universities of the country";
*"The Faculty of Literature is also considered one of the best in the country." 85.72.64.115 12:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Alta Car and Engineering Company

message: How can they have started planning a car to Formula One dimensions, when F1 wasn't introduced until the end of 1946?
:They didn't, that was the Alta GP car. Alta never built a Formula One car, the car that were entered for the F1 World Championship were either the GP car (1950-51) or the Alta F2 car in 1952. Actually, there never was such a thing as the Alta auto racing team, all of the cars were privately entered. Maybe this page shouldn't actually exist? Pyrope 18:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, now I come to ready this page properly, it's complete rubbish. I'll rewrite... Pyrope 21:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1945
Talk:Hisham's Palace

message: Confusion of terms. North of the residential PALACE, there was a large AUDIENCE HALL with a pool and a diwan, with an attached Roman-style BATH HOUSE. The audience hall has a mosaic floor; the bath house probably never did. Arminden (talk) 11:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total confusion of terms 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ptcoyle17 (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Arts of the Islamic World
Talk:Step over

message: There is no article yet on "stepover (topography)", but I have created a red link, which in time will lead to an article. There are many other fields in which the term is used. The redirect stepover -> Step over, only dealing with football, won't be tenable for long. Arminden (talk) 04:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A term not limited to football
Talk:Jim Kweskin

message: I am going to try and expand this article. Please feel free to join me. Michaelgossett (talk) 22:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice of Intention

message: Jim Kweskin is probably best known as a singer and bandleader, but he also created one of the bedrock guitar styles of the folk revival, adapting the ragtime-blues fingerpicking of artists like Blind Boy Fuller to the more complex chords of pop and jazz. He has maintained a remarkably consistent musical vision since his jug band days, continuing to explore traditional folk and blues with the sophisticated sensibility of a jazz musician and jazz with the communal simplicity of a folk artist. He has recorded solo ventures, as a member of the U and I band, and with U and I bandmate Samoa Wilson, and continues to perform widely in various formats. In recent years he and Geoff Muldaur have often appeared as a duo, revisiting and expanding on their Jug Band repertoire.  Michaelgossett (talk) 22:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff to edit and add after rewrite
Talk:Rabi frequency

message: According to the encyclopedia of laser physics by RP-Photonics then the rabi frequency is 2*pi*1/oscillation which is the angular frequency, not the normal frequency like I think this article defines it as. Please clarify for me. --ojs 13:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, after reconsidering then I think this article has a correct definition, I must have been thinking about the Rabi cycle article before I edited it.--ojs 14:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Malaysia-related topics

message: IMHO this page is a bit of a mess. I found the section for towns, which has
:7.16.1 Towns in Kedah
:7.16.2 Towns in Malacca
:7.16.3 Towns in Pahang
:7.16.4 Towns in Penang
:7.16.5 Towns in Perak
:7.16.6 Towns in Perlis
:7.16.7 Putrajaya
:7.16.8 Towns in Sarawak
:7.16.9 Towns in Selangor
:7.16.10 Towns in Terengganu
so I wondered about the other states. Then in the body of the page, I found
:See also: #Towns in Johor
:See also: #Towns in Negeri Sembilan
:See also: #Towns in Sabah
So what about the towns in Kelantan? There's a category (:Category:Towns in Kelantan) and plenty of them (Bachok • Dabong • Gua Musang • Jeli • Kota Bharu (capital) • Kuala Krai • Machang • Pasir Mas • Pasir Puteh • Pengkalan Chepa • Pengkalan Kubur • Pengkalan Pasir • Perupok • Rantau Panjang • Tanah Merah • Tumpat) - but where do they belong?
I think a decision needs to be made as to how the page is organised. Any ideas? -- Euchiasmus 13:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As the subject says, this page is very large and cumbersome, trying to visually scan for a topic is a large search, and there is considerable replication with other pages. Some examples are List of plants of Malaysia and Flora of Malaysia (sorry, this is at Category:Flora of Malaysia, but when try to link I can't). There should be some rationalisation, and unfortunately I am pleading ignorance on how to do such stuffBrunswicknic (talk) 16:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large, cumbersome and replicated 
Talk:Niddhi Tikoo

message: Have searched a little it sounds as though this young actress may not yet have become notable enough for a wikipedia article. However, I have removed the speedy delete tag (CSD 1) because it is clearly not nonsense. As the speedy tag was removed several times by the author - I'd suggest anyone who thinks the article shouldn't be here try an AfD nomination - not a PROD - as this one is obviously contested. Paxse 13:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:James Bellamy (Upstairs, Downstairs)

message: It is clearly stated in the programme that James was 30 in 1912 - we know he was born in June ("Magic Casements"); therefore by reason of simple maths his birthday must have been JUNE 1882.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.64.117.166 (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe there are many inconsistencies in the books and related cannon books.--UpDown (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  James' age 

message: The main heading introduces him as James Hugo Bellamy but elsewhere is addressed as James Rupert Bellamy.  Which is correct? Cloptonson (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian Names - discrepancy
Talk:Compassion Australia

message: I don't think that it would be appropriate to merge Compassion Australia with Compassion International. Is is the same global organization, but Australia is it's own organization with the resources and support of Compassion International. The same is true for all other partner counties with CI (USA, Italy, Canada, now Germany...) That would be like saying PepsiCO and Gatorade and Quaker Oats should now be the same name/company. Bgoodlin 15:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite true. Those companies make vastly different products while Compassion does the same thing whether in Australia as in the United States, Canada or other sponsor countries. I would like to merge the one paragraph of unique content into the :Compassion International article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging w/ Compassion International
Talk:2000 FA Cup final

message: Reference to man utd should be removed. adds nothing to the article, really isn't worth much, and implies that the only reason Man Utd weren't in the final was because they didn't want to play in the FA Cup that year  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.47.115 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1999 FA Cup final

message: as I said, a few things.  I'll try to work on a couple of them.
*A couple of [citation needed] are there now for facts which have no references at all.
*The match report is a bit brief as noted by Kosack.  I'll try to expand it a little.
*Where are the precise timings for goals/yellow cards etc?  The BBC report is shy of a few of them.  I've found this which might be of use for a few of the major events.
*Run the duplicate links checker and resolve any issues after expanding.
*Where are the following referenced:
**Team formations,
**Player positions,
**Player nationalities?
The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you mind pointing me to the duplicate links checker? I can't seem to find it. – PeeJay 08:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  my "tools" on the left-hand side has "Highlight duplicate links" at bottom when I'm looking at the article.  If you don't have it (it might be one of a plethora of scripts I have installed, I can't remember), I'll happily do it for you. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 08:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means. As long as you don't need my login details to do it, I'm happy for you to add any functionality to my profile you think is useful. – PeeJay 08:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find it, are you sure you don't have it in the "tools" panel on the left of the article?  I've run mine and fixed the three overlinks (along with a rephrase to avoid saying Ketsbaia twice in three words) but it's a good idea to periodically run it after making mass edits because (if you're like me) I'm never certain if I've linked items just once!  The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 08:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely don't have it. The only script I've installed is one to tell me the page size. I'll see if I can find the dupe links one. – PeeJay 09:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it:  it's here: User:The Rambling Man/common.js, the importScript('User:Ucucha/duplinks.js'); line.  Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 09:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Things to address 

message: According to this BBC article, this was the first FA Cup Final where no replay would be played in the event of a draw. Does anyone have any suggestions of how this could be integrated into the existing text? – PeeJay 16:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replays 
Talk:1995 FA Cup final

message: If I remember correctly, Manchester United wore black shorts on the day.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.237.229 (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my DVD, both teams wore white shorts; Manchester United's shorts had black and red trim, while Everton's had blue trim. Furthermore, oddly, both teams wore black socks, although Everton's were hooped with blue while United's had red tops. Obviously the two teams wore different-coloured shirts. – PeeJay 18:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  KITS 

message: Really? And Brian McClair in midfield?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.234.174.205 (talk) 23:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how the teams were described in the contemporary match coverage (which I have on DVD). – PeeJay 10:37, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicky Butt at centre forward 

message: "Between them, those three had scored 41 goals during the season". 
What competitions are included in that description? Does it include Cole's Newcastle goals? Mobile mundo (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manchester United missing players 
Talk:1990 FA Cup final

message: I added the fact that John Salako was born in Nigeria to the section that mentions Palace were the last team to play an all English XI in an FA Cup Final. It's a bit of a nonsense really as at the time he hadn't played for England, he didn't debut until 1991). So had Wikipedia been around at the time of the game he'd have had a Nigerian flag.Statto74 (talk) 10:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  All English 
Talk:The Orphans series

message: I think it would make sense if each novel had its own article, accessible from the main Virginia C. Andrews article - which has a section on each series listing the books and the main plot arc. This page could then redirect to that. Madmedea 14:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article currently does not meet WP:V and WP:Plot, and there is no clear indication of WP:Notability. That is the priority. The sections on each novel are not very long, and do not yet require splitting out. If they do become large enough they can be split per WP:Summary style. Split is not appropriate at the moment. SilkTork *YES! 21:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Malosma

message: Right, so it says that the fruits can be used to make flour. I checked the source on this and the exact words don't say they make flour. The exact words are as follows: "Fruits eaten after being pounded, dried, and winnowed; decoction of R. laurina root bark drunk for dysentery."
I'm not sure if this is a useful distinction, considering it very much seems like the text describes the process of making flour, but I figured I'd at least open a talk about it.
IntenseSwelling (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Use" Section 

message: How do I transplant, by seed? 2603:8000:9100:4DEE:94A4:DB42:FBC8:CA6 (talk) 17:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propagation