Talk:Jomsvikings

message: Does Saxo Grammaticus really mentions Jomsvikings? IMHo, but I read comments about it quite long ago, he only mentions JULIN, city of SLAVIC pirates, and does not mentions Jomsvikings. AFAIK sagas are ONLY source which mentions Jomsvikings. Szopen 11:35, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't spread desinformation. In Gesta Danorum, book 10, there is no mention of Slavic members and it was led by Styrbjörn the Strong.--Berig 22:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, as far as historicity is concerned, we'd better leave the decision to the readers. When saga matters are concerned opinions differ widely from scholar to scholar on what is "historic" or not. As long as archaeologists have not identified any such settlement it is better to be careful. I don't see why a location on the Wendish shore could not have been a basis of Viking operations when both Kiev and Dublin were.--Berig 08:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 20:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: This article's GA status has been revoked because it fails criterion 2. b. of 'What is a Good Article?', which states;
::(b) the citation of its sources using inline citations is required (this criterion is disputed by editors on Physics and Mathematics pages who have proposed a subject-specific guideline on citation, as well as some other editors — see talk page).
LuciferMorgan 01:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for GA Delisting 

message: I was wondering where the stance that the Jomsvikings were "staunchly pagan, they have been compared to the Crusaders of Christendom" comes from.  I have read the Jomsvikings Saga and it did not seem to focus on this at all.  Perhaps I have a strange translation, or the translation I have is from an unusual original manuscript.  I also know that the Jomsvikings are mentioned in other sources that I have not yet read.  I was wondering in which of the original sources they are discussed as fighting for heathendom.  I do not seem to find this as prevalent belief on other web sites.  --Jomfinding 19:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jomsvikings Heathen Crusaders? 

message: Very good artcile:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/medieval.www/sagaconf/slupecki.pdf
Szopen 16:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth of Jomsvikings 

message: Why is this article currently at Jomvikings if the name is Jomsvikings? --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 05:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it should be moved. Haukur (talk) 07:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jomvikings?

message: Should historical articles link to modern re-enactment groups ? It seems to be they shouldn't and I speak as an active re-enactor. This article has two such links and I wonder if they should be removed ? Guthroth (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-enactment Links 

message: Probably too trivial to mention, but Jomviking the New was the Fantasy literature society at Cambridge for about 30 years from the mid 1970s  - until it merged with CUSFS due to falling numbers. Members wore a long orange Scarf. 
It spawned Joms in Exile, a group that met in London and contained both ex-members and others. 86.151.136.178 (talk) 10:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambridge Fantasy Society