Talk:Combat flight simulation game

message: Namco's Ace Combat series is mentioned here. They are arcade action games, not flight simulators in any serious capacity. They do not belong on this page. Compare Ace Combat 5 to Falcon 4.0. Not in the same league.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.0.239.250 (talk) 04:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's because someone's Bot is being a dick about what images you can use. 66.229.160.94 10:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I tried to contribute following your indications, convening that the hystorical section is rather imprecise and lacking a lot of milestones, but I see that my work has been deleted by a punctilious inquisitor who takes pleasure acting as destroyer of works made by others. Have no time to redo or to enter litigations because I have other to do in life that lose time with such pedantic guys. Have a good life.--Corrado72 (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Inaccuracy

message: while somewhat informative, this article should include a comprehensive table of apps along with current version, currently active development, time since last release etc.  as other articles on software genre do.. as it currently is, a typical user looking for currently available titles is not informed at all.
(Anuoldman (talk) 19:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete survey 

message: In the list of examples of "historical" combat flight simulators I definitely removed the sentence Simulators of current modern wars are usually classified not by the period of war, but rather as a separate category of "modern jet simulators". The sentence is right, of course, but there's no reason to don't expand the list with the corresponding examples of modern jet fighter simulators... So, instead of leaving the sentence where it was, I deleted it and expanded the list, creating a new category on it. The so called "modern" jet fighters started during the Vietnam war, 40 years ago. Fourty long years should be enough (and indeed, it is) to create a new historical category in the lists. I created it not following a series of conflicts (like the former simulators in the lists, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam) but by noticing to the reader that these simulators correspond to the jet fighters of fourth and fifth generations. This is, in my humble opinion, the proper way to present the list of historical sims. Kintaro (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Historical" simulators 

message: I've modified the text to use neutral in multiple places. Old text did not have basis or reference to comparisons made so it was not justified to leave it as such.
Also the old list is changed to use tables now for better clarity.
Many titles could be classified in various different categories so it should be possible to add those for each as necessary.
Ipr1 (talk) 11:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral tone for content 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Combat flight simulation game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202223700/http://www.index.migman.com/ to http://www.index.migman.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow editors. I am enrolled in a Technical Editing class at Texas A&M, and I will be editing this article as a part of our Wikipedia project. Please be patient with me as I am still learning. The following is a preliminary list of the tasks I plan to work on:
# Clean up the content of the article for better flow and organization
# Overhaul the "Types" section to better fit with the rest of the article
# Correct the tone of the article to fit Wikipedia's standards
# Remove redundant information
# Add citations where I can
I will continue to list major issues as they arise. Do not hesitate to reach out! --Scott Rayner (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planning Edits