Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Ethics/archive

message: I see that there is already an ethics category, which might be a good place to start searching and/or adding to relevant articles.  (I'm not sure how to link to this in a discussion--it wants to go at the bottom)  WhiteC 19:54, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You can link to categories using :Category:Ethics and it will show up like this: :Category:Ethics. --malathion talk 18:19, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, many thanks.  I just removed the bit at the bottom of the talk here (for reference it was Category:Ethics ).  WhiteC 04:53, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ethics category

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 18:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Where is the Userbox for this project located? -PatPeter 02:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme