lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Heike Lätzsch

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 11:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Heiko Westermann

message: The article says that "his goalscoring, which is unnaturally high for a defender". But, according to the same article, this player has scored 11 goals in 182 games, which is not high at all even for a defender.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.36.209.81 (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Donatus, Landgrave of Hesse

message: This is the wrong coat of arms. Because Donatus is part of the line of Hessen-Kassel-Rumpenheim. Rumpenheim is a branch of the oldest line Hessen-Kassel. The coat of arms shown belongs to Hessen-Darmstadt an extinct line. 95.222.221.150 (talk) 18:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not the wrong coat of arms. Donatus is head of the entire House of Hesse and, as such, is titular Grand Duke and Elector of Hesse (Hesse and by Rhine and Hesse-Cassel). Seven Letters 20:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms

message: In my opinion, this article should follow the common practice as most articles on persons following WP:COMMONNAME: While the article name is the common name, which is sensible, in the article intro the official name should be used, followed by an explanation of the common name. --Theoreticalmawi (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in the intro of the article 

message: I would replace
:
with
:He is a third cousin once removed of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, whose funeral he attended, both being descended from Prince William of Hesse-Kassel (1787–1867); and also related to him by marriage …
Comments? Tamfang (talk) 01:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  kinship 

message: This article has a short description WP:SDESC German Royal.  That's absurd. There is no German royal family. Hmcst1 (talk) 17:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A short description is Wikipedia-specific and relates to an individual encyclopedia article here on the English Wikipedia. Hmcst1 (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short descriptor
Talk:Ahmet Çakar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: www.insideworldsoccer.com/2013/03/ex-turkish-ref-demonstrates-how-uefa.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Struway2 (talk) 12:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Helen Fraser (actress)

message: How is it she met Peter Hanford in 1964 on the set of Billy Liar when the film is dated 1963? Or was this a continuity error. Stuffed cat (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Helen Razer

message: It is a shame that Helen is not on JJJ anymore, will there ever be a come-back?143.216.49.250 (talk)Marc.S  —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss you on JJJ 

message: Some random IP address removed an external link to one of Helen Razer's recent newspaper articles.  I put it back again, as it's the only example of her newspaper work in the article.  If there's a better one, so be it, but there should be a link to at least one of her pieces. cojoco (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMH article removed and then re-instated 

message: It's worth noting that the high level of vandalism this article has been subjected to appears to have been conducted by the subject of this article and followers of her Twitter stream. Given that Razer often writes about technology issues, this may be building towards an article somewhere, and if so, I hope that she posts a link to it here if/when its published. Nick-D (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent vandalism
Talk:Helen Rodd

message: Not one of the better known guppy-spot workers. Abductive (talk) 16:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 
Talk:Helen Smith (psychologist)

message: This stub needs expansions and bringing up to date, but I don't have time just now. We should mention at least:
*"Ask Dr Helen" column and videos at PJM
*Appearances on The Biography Channel
Cheers, CWC 14:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes for update 

message: Since no one is actually interested in this article except one true believer who refuses to make edits (or realizes they can't be made to prove notability), I have repeatedly nominated it for deletion and he/she vandalizes my nomination and my edits.
I say delete. There is nothing notable about this person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.156.52 (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone except the original author can decline a speedy deletion nomination by removing the template. Replacing the template (repeatedly) is disruptive. If you feel strongly, take it to WP:AFD. Toddst1 (talk) 19:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A frequent guest on national TV who is an increasingly influential voice in defense of men. Nicmart (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not notable, delete
Talk:Helen Watanabe-O'Kelly

message: There are currently no references to support general notability and no assertions of notability as an academic.  Cusop Dingle (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Any explanation for the 'Watanabe'? Given her father was 'O'Kelly', presumably either her mother was a 'Watanabe', or it's her husband's name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.126.135 (talk) 16:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Monozygotic twins

message: I have just set up this low-standard genetics article. Please add to it and expand it. Thanks. Rowan 11:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kick-off

message: This article seems like a plug for the US National Library of Medicine more than a reference on monozygotic twins.
66.92.158.130 18:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial

message: makes sense to merge with twin page, wasnt very helpful by itself  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.168.215 (talk) 22:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: i agree with merge
Talk:Helena Norberg-Hodge

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Nearly a Start class.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Val Gardena

message: This article has been renamed from Val Gherdëina to Val Gardena as the result of a move request.
 - unanimous support for move. Keith D (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - as above, WP:COMMONNAME should decide FlagSteward (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
*See Talk:Comuni of the Province of Bolzano-Bozen for a related discussion. The result of that discussion was to use the single widely used name in English, and if there isn't one, pick the local majority name (which would be the Ladin name Val Gherdëina in this case). I guess "Val Gardena" qualifies as a widely used name. Markussep Talk 12:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - as above, WP:COMMONNAME should decide FlagSteward (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
*See Talk:Comuni of the Province of Bolzano-Bozen for a related discussion. The result of that discussion was to use the single widely used name in English, and if there isn't one, pick the local majority name (which would be the Ladin name Val Gherdëina in this case). I guess "Val Gardena" qualifies as a widely used name. Markussep Talk 12:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: There's some nice pics on :de:Val Gardena but it looks like the best of them has a dodgy Wikipedia-only licence. Anyone want to sort out the licensing? Thanks for doing the name change Keith. FlagSteward (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: which image you refer to specifically?--Moroderen (talk) 20:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: There is someone trying to forcefully italianize the original Ladin names of Gherdëina like the fashists did it with Mussolini. Is there a way to stop these nationalists? Some administrator might intervene!?--Moroder (talk) 05:08, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italianize
Talk:Hellmut Krug

message: Has Hellmut Krug refereed any matches involving FC Schalke 04? --84.61.150.162 (talk) 18:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FC Schalke 04 
Talk:MedCalc

message: It very interesting that in page with software information are added such chapters like 
Certifications, 2 direct links to web-site and the page is written using " It is best known for its...".
May be user tesimonials should be also published? :( See history of this page.
Where is it "best" known? Who decides it?
The page is written by author & seller of this software. And I dislike it. Author & seller ever doesn't create own page, no information is available about him. And only one page was published.
Wiki should not be a place for ads.
Alexeysim06 11:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: interesting 

message: I have added several references which are neutral and show notability. 
Frank1848 (talk) 14:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I read a couple of them and they were both trivial mentions. The sources must include substantial content specifically about MedCalc, not a mere mention of the name of the program. - MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There are actually 2 independently published books, entirely dedicated to the program. These do not seem to be trivial mentions. Frank1848 (talk) 14:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References &amp; notability
Talk:Hendra Setiawan

message: Hi Wikipedians,
I need more sources for Hendra Setiawan's victory and career info, as most of the information shown is not backed up with any cited sources. If you have any sources relating to it, please do add it in! There are also missing content and a lot of documentation is needed for the Grand Prix titles and early 2010s. If there is no news articles, then use TournamentSoftware as a last resort.
Thank you! signed by User:IssacT6 05:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi IssacT6. There were some English sources in BWF, Badzine, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta Globe, and also some reliable Indonesian language sources in Kompas, Antara, Republika, Tempo. For early 2010s information, you can use Kompas data, or archived version of old  Badzine website, bwfbadminton.org from 2010, and internationalbadminton.org from 2006. Thanks Stvbastian (talk) 12:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed
Talk:Henrik Pontén

message: Because we are all fighting over this, his name is still Henrik Pontén, not Pirate Pontén. Though it may be legally, it was not done by his own freewill, meaning that the name change is only but a minor thing and will eventually be undone and likely changed to an illegal name change (which it really is) this means that at no time are we to change the article to Pirate Pontén. A prankster is a prankster, not Henrik Pontén and this will only last about a month or so. Rgoodermote  00:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Rules are rules, this name change was not of his freewill and was done to insult him. As a result, Wikipedia will not refer to him as anything other than Henrik Potén. For it is inaccurate and libelous and violates WP:BIO. I will continue to come back here as long as I see my watchlist report a change on the page, this is a fairly high profile individual. His article is also not as well known, some one has to defend it..and I am doing that against my personal opinion of the man.  Rgoodermote  21:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Henrik Schyffert

message: I re-wrote and extended this article yesterday. When a bot removed a link to a YouTube clip which I had added, the entire article was reverted.
I undid this reversion and removed the YouTube link. ---- Anonymous Oct. 28th 2008
Henrik Schyffert never worked as a VJ for MTV. He worked in the office.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orograph (talk • contribs) 09:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update and bot removal
Talk:Henry Hunt (artist)

message: Don't have time to "strip" it and maybe will get back with the Canada-pd license template to add it myself, but this is a picture of Henry Hunt presetending a button blanket to Lieutenat-Governor Frank Ross in 1957; so as of 2007 that picture is public-domain and can be used here.Skookum1 (talk) 07:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Found pic (pd)
Talk:Henry Rowan

message: I became aware of this article through OTRS — Wikimedia received an email about this article which was then forwarded to the OTRS system. I made an independent assessment resulting in the recent edit.
Two issues were addressed:
# a descriptive word in the lead
# a sentence in the third paragraph alleging sale of equipment that “…improved the accuracy of nuclear warheads…”
I’ll address the second item first.
The sentence was supported by three references:http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1987-11-08/news/0160070102_1_consarc-carbon-soviet-unionhttp://articles.philly.com/1998-07-03/business/25736765_1_consarc-furnace-export-licensehttps://fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc11.htm
The first discusses a sale of equipment to the Soviet Union that did occur. However, as is clearly noted in the article, while an investigation was undertaken by U.S. Customs and the FBI, no charges were brought. The equipment provided produces material that has both nonmilitary and possible military uses. However, it is only a supposition in the article that the material could be used for warheads. It is not a supported claim, and the government investigation resulting in no charges means we cannot reach a different conclusion.
The second reference is a discussion of a sale that did not occur. Enough said.
The third reference is a discussion of the same sale and some additional information — the sale did not occur either to Iraq or to China.
Thus, we have three references, two of which talk about sales that did not occur in one of which talks about a sale that did occur but no conclusion that supports the original sentence in the article.
Returning to the first item, there was no reference attached to the term “war profiteer”. This is not strictly required if the term is adequately supported in the remainder of the article. However, noting that the term is a loaded term, it requires extraordinary support (ideally, an exact use of the term in a reference). Even if the sentence recently removed were valid it would still be a stretch to use the term, but given that the recently remove sentence isn’t even supportable there is no validity for the term so I have removed it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits to lead and relating to warhead claim
Talk:Henry Sobel

message: The article forgot to mention that Henry Sobel has Kleptomania, a mental disorder characterized by compulsive and uncontrollable stealing. Please include that, for this explains why he stole the neckties.--Idontknow610 (talk) 21:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can provide a source for it which meets the guidelines at WP:RS, we can certainly include it.--Dali-Llama (talk) 02:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

text: There was good reason why I mentioned WP:RS. You cited a blog, which as is often the case, which does not meet the WP:RS requirements.--Dali-Llama (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

text: A hypothesis is not good enough for an encyclopedia. Also, this is clearly a biography of a living person, so the degree of accuracy of the article must be beyond reproach. And besides, even the article cites a psychiatrist who clearly rules out kleptomania.--Dali-Llama (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

text: "I" didn't put any hypothesis. The article contains part of a press release by the hospital and a statement at a press conference by Henry Sobel. This is not a hypothesis--it's not even ascribing a cause for his actions. It's just a press release and part of his press conference.--Dali-Llama (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Again, read WP:BLP, WP:RS and WP:OR. The article does not have any hypothesis. You're inferring a hypothesis from what the doctors and Sobel said. Adding an explicit hypothesis not backed by a reliable source is original research and potentially libelous. Both big no-no's at Wikipedia.--Dali-Llama (talk) 02:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kleptomania 

message: As far as I understand it, those categories are mutually exclusive. Is he a Reform Rabbi or a Conservative Rabbi? Ninguém (talk) 00:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reform or Conservative? 
Talk:Henry Tuilagi

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Barely a Start class.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Henryk Mandelbaum

message: removed "and" from "Mandelbaum and others had to dig two huge pits then and burn the dead bodies in them" Sydtrolls (talk) 15:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greece/Sidebar

message: Is there a way to either shrink the table or redo it? It just screws up the view. --Kimontalk 13:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If we change  to  we should be fine. --Kimontalk 20:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article statistics
Template talk:Greek script needed

message: Jadidjw, سلام دوستزاره من لطفاً در این فیسبوک با من تماس بگیرید: ازلان گوجار(I.D Azlan Gujjar) من می خواهم با شما صحبت کنم. آیا پاسخ در اینجا لطفا فقط به من پاسخ در فیس بوک من Id با تشکر از شما.
سلام زما هزاره ملګری لطفا په دې فیس بوک کې له ما سره اړیکه ونیسئ: (ID Azlan Gujjar) زه غواړم له تاسو سره خبرې وکړم. دلته ځواب مه ورکوئ ، مهربانی وکړئ یوازې زما په فیسبوک ID کې ځواب ورکړئ مننه.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:3100:1899:FE5:1:0:4517:790C (talk) 21:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Sister Catherine Treatise

message: Having written the article I would love to categorise it but I don't understand the instructions (I never do with the Wikipedia, alas!). Can someone step in? I don't know what categories would be suitable - Christianity? Heresies? Middle Ages? Christian Mysticism? ThePeg 12:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: ★NealMcB★ (talk) 16:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs details on when it was published, by whom, what we know about extant copies etc
Talk:Delay (programming)

message: This article is essentially a definition of delayed evaluation, a concept that is already explained in the article on lazy evaluation. The latter article could use some work but both of these articles need to be developed in coordination with each other. I do have one proposal. In the article on lazy evaluation the concepts of lazy and delayed evaluations are treated as equivalent, which ignores the fact that lazy evaluation usually refers to a type of delayed evaluation where each argument expression is never evaluated more than once. Implementing this more efficient version of delayed evaluation is involved and could warrant an article to itself. So my proposal is to create a separate article on delayed evaluation and merge this article with portions of the article on lazy evaluation and have the article on lazy evaluation focus only on the notion I just described. A B Carter (talk) 12:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about Actors (objects, processes) that implement delays.  As such it is closely related to but different than the evaluation method Delayed Evaluation that is used in some programming languages.  You have a good suggestion that the material in these articles should be tightly integrated. --2ndMouse 20:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The suggested "article on delayed evaluation" is Futures and promises. It already duplicates the whole content of this article, in the 'Definition' section, but with 'future' in place of 'delay'. This matches my understanding: 'delay' is just a synonym for 'future', and delayed evaluation can be either eager or lazy (see for example Scheme SRFI 45). I suggest making Delay (programming) a redirect to Futures and promises, and explaining the usage of the term 'delay' there. --DavidHopwood 17:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Age in months

message: I need help!!! It doesnt seem to want to work =( the sum is correct but it keeps saying unknown expression character '{'
Why is this?
Smashman2004 (talk • contribs • email) 12:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bug

message: According to this template's documentation, this should return the number of full months. So on 2007-10-05,  should be returning 0 since it is one day shy of 1 month; instead, however, it returns 1. I am changing the template to have the expected behavior.
Also, most other date templates seem to take their parameters as Y|M|D order rather than D|M|Y, and having the parameters in D|M|Y order will confuse those of us who live in countries that use M/D/Y date order. Therefore, I am also changing the date order to Y|M|D (and fixing all existing transclusions). Anomie 20:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bug fix and misc changes