Talk:Issyk kurgan

message: The Russian wikipedia article dates the burial to the 6th-5th cent. BC. Unfotunately, they cite no sources. --Ghirla-трёп- 21:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 2007 

message: Didn't they find cannabis in here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.140.229 (talk) 20:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weed 

message: looks like Old Turkic script  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.103.149.165 (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure that the first old turkic script was found on a 7th AD monument?
Image:Fig6Ishjamts_p166R1.gif|2nd century BC – 2nd century AD, characters of Hun- Syanbi script (Mongolia and Inner Mongolia), N. Ishjatms, "Nomads In Eastern Central Asia", in the "History of civilizations of Central Asia", Volume 2, Fig 5, p. 166, UNESCO Publishing, 1996, 
Image:Fig5Ishjamts p166R2.gif|2nd century BC – 2nd century AD, characters of Hun–Syanbi script (Mongolia and Inner Mongolia), N. Ishjatms, "Nomads In Eastern Central Asia", in the "History of civilizations of Central Asia", Volume 2, Fig 5, p. 166, UNESCO Publishing, 1996, 
Image:ToyokAndRjukokuAlphabets.gif|Oldest known Türkic alphabet listings, Rjukoku and Toyok manuscripts. Toyok manuscript transliterates Türkic alphabet into Uygur alphabet. Per I.L.Kyzlasov, "Runic Scripts of Eurasian Steppes", Moscow, Eastern Literature, 1994.
--Arslanteginghazi (talk) 15:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

text: armor found within the tomb is not of Turkic style, quite unique. and modern scholars(?) believe the old Turkic script is derived from Scythians or Sugdians or even old Indians". Such a genius! Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it Old Turkic script? 

message: There is no link to Russian article in the English one, and vice versa.
91.197.11.243 (talk) 09:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you put a link here or my talk page to the Russian one so that this can be corrected? --Jnorton7558 (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 91.197.11.243, 20 September 2011 

message: This article is not written from a Neutral point of view.
There are numerous sources stating that the inscription is Turkish. None of them are represented. Efforts to put them in the article is constantly being stopped even though they are sourced. But only Persian view is represented. This is not Neutral point of view but Aryan nationalism.
Anti-Turkist Wikipedia writers and administrators can not change the history.
This article is a shame. --98.196.232.128 (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: turks became the ruler of the central asia steppe at around 6th century"  You need to go to mental institute my friend.Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know WP:NPA? --Florian Blaschke (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. You can be reported for that. You attacked to me or another users several times. "Pan-turkist", "Pan turanist", "Pan bla bla" or direct insult like "idiot". Careful yourself.Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 19:40, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I never called you specifically an idiot (but if the shoe fits, feel free to wear it), and "Pan-Turkist" or "Turkocentrist" is not exactly an insult. Speaking of mental instutions, if you don't stop painting yourself constantly as the victim of other users' bullying, people could come to the conclusion that you might have some sort of persecution complex. In any case, dishing out insults like "You need to go to mental institute" and then complaining about other people attacking you doesn't exactly help your credibility. Just a friendly advice. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

text: No, that's not an insult, at worst it's being snarky. Also, "nationalist" is not an insult, even if nationalists are generally idiots. Sorry, mate. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't "Turkomaniac idiot" a tautology or at least redundant as any kind of maniac is sort of an idiot? And I'm afraid we have a lot of nationalist editors on Wikipedia. It's a major problem as the IP and Florian have both said, although from different perspectives. Of course an editor can be reported for using such terms, but whether anything happens, or anyone gets blocked (which could be the person doing the reporting or the reported), will depend upon the exact case. However, I might support a block for editors telling other editors they are crazy unless their edits show clear signs of mental illness.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 13:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view 

message: Is this site also called "Aq-kurgan"? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Also "Aq-kurgan"?

message: The Turkish page explains the research on the script. Harmatta's finding seems dubious in light of later work. It's presented as a shut case here, which seems like a disinformation edit. 176.33.66.239 (talk) 23:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incongruous with Turkish page