Talk:Gunatitanand Swami

message: The current Gunatitanand Swami article contains very little information about Gunatitanand Swami himself and instead seems to focus rather heavily on Swamini Vato. As such, it is not only glaringly incomplete but fails to provide insightful information about a very important Saint in the context of Swaminarayan Hinduism as a whole. Furthermore, the entire article has very poor sourcing, with the web reference from which most of the biographical information is sourced either not in existence or inaccessible. In light of the above, I have attempted to improve the article by providing a detailed explanation of Gunatitanand Swami’s life and his impact on Swaminarayan Hinduism using a variety of authoritative published materials, and attempting to provide valid citations of every statement. Comments and suggestions are always welcome. Rooneywayne17 (talk) 23:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Change to article

message: Anonymous User 86.26.93.20’s recent edits, which seem aimed at discrediting the views discussed in the article by stating repeatedly that they are “open to bias,” are unsubstantiated and unverified.  As per WP:Verifiability standards, “any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.”
More generally, I would ask this anonymous user to engage in a good faith discussion on this talk page before making such wide-ranging edits.  A constructive dialogue about improving and developing this article is always welcome, but I request that you do so under a registered account name in order to facilitate such collaboration.
Thanks,
HinduPundit (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous edits 

message: The edited portion at the end of the article continues to be removed by some overly sensitive member of the faction for whatever reason. Swamini Vato is considered a moderate level writings in the Original faith giving the Vachamrut, Shikshapatri and Satsangi Jeevan more importance while BAPS gives this more importance in favor of the last mention writings. Since this is such an imporant writing, it needs to be acknowledged to the public (as it has by BAPS, I do not see why this cult member does not want this to be on wiki?) that changes have been made based on reseach. Do not change this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.217.173.221 (talk) 01:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BAPS Modified Version 

message: : Swamiblue, the detail looks good. There may be a possibility of reducing some info, but not much. I suggest that the tag be removed.--Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is not overly detailed, but rather well-cited and well-researched. I agree that the tag should be removed. Sacredsea (talk) 20:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

text: I think the second paragraph in the first section is redundant b/c there's already a section for Gunatitanand Swami as BAPS. Can I remove if nobody objects? Moksha88 (talk) 01:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is overly detailed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Gunatitanand Swami. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.rajkotgurukul.org/the-gurukul/grand-tradition/sadguru-shri-gunatitanand-swami/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In reviewing this article, I think some of the phrasing is awkward and could be reduced. I will thus be editing the article section by section and would appreciate any feedback along the way. Moksha88 (talk) 01:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward Phrasing 

message: Harshil169 - Reverted edit to Mulji Jani vs. Mulji Sharma. Gunatitanand Swami's name, prior to receiving sadhu initiation, was Mulji Jani. Swaminarayan Hinduism - Williams & Trivedi; Chapter 5, page 123. Apollo1203 (talk) 11:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mulji Jani Name 

message: I will be making edits. From the scripture Swaminarayan Mahamantra Mahima.  It will all be referenced from here. Guruvani (talk) 00:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: On Wikipedia, the editor has mentioned the year 1784, But the actual year of birth was 1785 as mentioned on baps.org, kids.baps.org, and kakaji.org hence 17 Oct is the date-wise birthday of AMA Gunatitanand Swami...
I have read this in the following book,
Language: Hindi
Pages: 147
ISBN: 81-7526-130-7
Edition: 1st, August 2006
Cover Type: Paperback
References:
Book ISBN: 81-7526-130-7(Aksharbrahma Gunatitanand Swami-Hindi) Page 4- Please find the attached images for reference. 
https://www.swaminarayan.org/gunatitanandswami/index.htm
https://www.kakaji.org/copy-of-lord-swaminarayana
https://kids.baps.org/aboutus/gunatitanandswami.htm
Kindly note and make it correct. Akshay8ahir (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Those sources appear to be self-published. If you could point to reliable sources such as books / encyclopedias, that would work. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: (Noting that OP has updated their post with a link to a book). This date mismatch certainly needs a footnote or something, the cited sources that I can access (only this one) say that he was born in 1785 like you say, I can't access the other ones. This year had been changed from 1785 to 1784 in this edit two years ago. Does anyone watching this page have access to the cited sources to verify this? – Thjarkur (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2020