lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yu-Gi-Oh! GX minor characters

message: I have protected this page because of the ongoing edit war. Geg and 63.246.178.172, you have both violated the three-revert rule. Please discuss here any changes that you would like to make to the article. When you reach an agreement I will unprotect it. Mushroom 20:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection of this article

message: It is not redundant. Yu-Gi-Oh! GX is a spinoff, therefore has its own sections. Character pages, etc. already exist on Wikipedia, and plot summaries detailing each minor character are written based on what has occured throughout the series. Links to appropriate pgs in regards to trivia are made, and do not have to be confirmed by outside sources because such references are made within the episodes themselves (such as Kabukid announcing Shizuka Gozen's name in full, despite her card not having that proper title). Redundancy does not make any sense at all, as the minor character's pg for the regular Yu-Gi-Oh! series contains no indications whatsoever of the characters appearing in GX; there is no connection between the character groups at all. Flagging this article for deletion is highly unnecesary when every other pg follows the same format. 14 July 2006. -Benten
Agreed. YU-gi-oh! does not equal Yu-gi-Oh!GX. I see no reason to delete this page. There is precedent as well. Plenty of other wikipedia pages about t.v. shows have special pages on minor characters, look at Minor secondary characters of Avatar: The Last Airbender.Stupidhumanzz 01:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: After watching 111 and 112, it's obvious that there's some kind of relationship between Napoleon and Martin (Napoleon's on a first name basis with the kid at the very least). Thing is, there isn't much telling exactly what that relationship is yet. So, should it be added now or after we know the specifics of what their relationship is? Viewtiful Rekk 22:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napoleon and Martin's relationship? 

message: I think this page is pushing things way too far on the inclusion of fair use images.  C'mon, people, those are copyrighted.  There is no need, for all these minor characters, to illustrate every one.  Mangojuicetalk 04:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Taiyou Torimaki and Raizou Monotari, Manjoume/Chazz's friends from the first few episodes aren't here.
They aren't refered to by name in the dub, but those are their names in YuGiOh GX Spirit Caller.
Compoundheart 04:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters missing 

message: Unless I've gone senile, or there's a new article for them that I missed, all the monsters and Duel Spirits are missing. This wouldn't be a big problem, but with more of them showing up in Season 3, I would think it's obvious that such an entry is needed, isn't it? Viewtiful Rekk 20:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spirit/Monsters missing.
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Red Link Recovery/Most red links

message: The list appears inaccurate or not up to date. The crossed out Places in Afghanistan has far more than 33 red links! KBi 01:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So true. This page needs serious updating. Actually, a new version should be generated, since this is based on April '06 data. Could someone with the ability/authority do that, pleeeeeease? --Ebyabe 16:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second (third?) that.  How else can a page that is itself redlinked contain 764 redlinks? ;) Shymian (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem - done. - TB (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you!! Shymian (talk) 10:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

message: Can someone please make it so that it also checks the pages' categories for "List of" before adding them? Currently, most if not all of the articles listed under the list section are, in fact, lists. Checking category links would probably identify at least half of them as lists, as well as other cues too. These can then be moved to the /Lists subpage to make room for a larger, more comprehensive list(hint hint).--vgmddg (look | talk | do) 21:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated this report again.  I'd agree fully with vgmddg that the old method of detecting lists is very crude and could be easily improved upon.  Alas, time does not permit right now (just become a dad for the third time).  I'll try and sort something out for next time. - TB (talk) 09:27, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of" screen not good enough. 

message: Has this project been abandoned? It appears the list hasn't been updated in more than four years. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There certainly don't appear to be many Wikipedia editors that are very active on this Project, but there are a few related Wikipedia pages that are routinely updated with a listing of the latest or "most popular" articles on Wikipedia that have a lot of red links associated with them...like: Wikipedia:Most-wanted_articles & User:West.andrew.g/Popular_redlinks for example. Guy1890 (talk) 07:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: I intend to attempt a gradual clearing of this page by removing all the lists that should not be in this list (will take a very long time). Anyway I am not sure if all lists should be removed from this list or only lists explicitly beginning with List of. Thank you for any response. Matz44 04:59, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Advice Wanted
Talk:All This and Rabbit Stew

message: "This" is displayed with a lowercase "t" on the title screen. Therefore, the title "All This and Rabbit Stew" is incorrect. (Ibaranoff24 01:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm quite sure this cartoon could be considered acceptable for TV broadcast if they just replaced the black hunter with Elmer Fudd. Whip it! Now whip it good! 02:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Original article listed 1968 as the last time this cartoon aired on television, but I witnessed it as a child in the early 1990's. Will try and find out which station aired this cartoon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.243.218.67 (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited -- this cartoon aired on Saturday Mornings in Arkansas as late as the 1990's.  
Talk:Mu ren zhuang

message: Is there any knowledge on the history of the wooden dummy?
:Mostly colloquial and hard to verify... Frogular 03:20, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does the article use the Mandarin name when the rest of the article refers to it by the Cantonese name or as a "Wing Chun wooden dummy?" Atypicaloracle (talk) 07:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muk Yan Jong 
Talk:Local call

message: Is there any service that helps a telephone user determine whether a call between two numbers will be long distance?
Also, there is an odd billing custom in the US: local-long-distance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.21.15.181 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 20 December 2005
:Here's one: http://www.usa.att.com/localcallingarea/index.jsp --71.141.126.50 (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Italian scudo

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Italy Papal States 1689-I Quadrupla Scudo d'Oro.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 1, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-01-01. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Italy Papal States 1689-I Quadrupla Scudo d'Oro.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Maltese scudo

message: the conversion ratio to Euro is not clear. 79.177.231.197 (talk) 12:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  conversion ratio 

message: Also, the wording makes current use of scudi very unclear as to what is past and whaty is present. . .Surveyor792 (talk) 06:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: current usage vs. historic use
Talk:Burnie

message: I've noticed that edits changing the 'north west campus' of Utas to the 'Cradle Coast Campus' have been reverted in the past, why is this?  The correct title for the campus is 'Cradle Coast' to the best of my knowledge.
Also, an edit stating the original inhabitants of the area that Burnie occupies was reverted, why was this?
Cheers
Lowee 14:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cradle Coast is either a very recent name-change or a "marketing" name for the area.  It is still known as the north west coast to almost all  Tasmanians.  The edit about the original inhabitants was unsourced and contained no links to verify the content.  Feel free to re-add it with an appropriate link though.  Regards, Chuq 01:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quesion 

message: The figure of 20k seems a little deceiving. Other then being dated, it seems Burnie and Devonport (including surrounding areas) are now included as a single entity (or Statistical Division, SD) by the ABS. The population for this SD is around 80k.
Does this mean the population for both Burnie and Devonport should be removed, as its unknown what population is located in Burnie only, as opposed to the SD (for example, like Kingston, which now has no popuation listed, and its value added to Hobart's)?
Davo499 (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: This fact needs a citation as it doesn't seem true. Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Fremantle and Port Adelaide are all much much larger container ports. There's also probably some others that would sit above Burnie as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.49.69.44 (talk) 04:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fifth Largest Container Port in Australia

message: I suggest deleting the whole paragraph about "Burnie Burns of Rooster Teeth Productions." It's about some alleged dispute about a domain name, so isn't particularly significant for Burnie, the town. It's also basically just an advertisment for Burnie Burns and Rooster Teeth Productions, who are probably little known in Tasmania. The claim that "The town of Burnie also gained some notability" through the affair is completely unsubstantiated, since the only citations given are to Rooster Teeth's own productions. Tangerine Cossack (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'm going to delete it myself. The lack of 3rd party citations shows that it has no significance or credibility. Tangerine Cossack (talk) 23:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Removed. Danithoch (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burnie Burns
Talk:David Ruprecht

message: Its tough to make this page as every bio is so heavily slanted towards praising him. Boston2austin 02:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:B-Sides & Rarities (Deftones album)

message: Thanks ScudLee I like the seagreen color.
Mike Holland 02:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Darkseagreen indicates that this album is a compilation.  See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums#Colors.  Thanks. - Lee  (talk) 05:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Poberezny

message: What is the source of the text tacked onto the end of the article by an anonymous user? If it is from a copyrighted source (which is most likely the case), it does not belong on Wikipedia. Willy Logan 02:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it comes from the EAA's bio page, which clearly states "Copyright © 2005 - Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc." Looks like copy-and-paste to me. Jaeger10 05:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "Aircraft experience" section contains a single paragraph consisting of four short declarative sentences - all four sentences start with "Poberezny...". I find this frequent repetition of the subject's name quite jarring. Roger (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style issue 

message: Why isn't the military services that Poberenzy served in listed in chronological order? His early active duty service in WW 2 isn't correctly listed. It has to be assumed that he served in WW 2 in the US Army Air Force. While it's listed that he obtained a number of pilot qualifications, what was his military career specialty during his service? I have it on personal knowledge that he ended his military career as a senior command aircraft maintenance officer which would appear to involve a lot more aeronautical engineering knowledge than a pilot, even a pilot with long experience.19:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military career information?
Talk:List of health and fitness magazines

message: I created this page, so please DO NOT delete anything I wrote including my links.
Thank you Pebs96
:I think you're missing the entire point of wikipedia.  :)  Monkeyman 03:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just below the 'Save Page' link, you should have seen this comment: 'If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.' Dawynn (talk) 04:48, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yu-Gi-Oh! Reshef of Destruction

message: I have changed this pile of scrap into a miracle page. Why do people put in such obvious things e.g The colour of the sky is blue?
We don't need cheats for a game on wiki, its not a gaming site--mexaguil 00:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

message: As I'm sure you're all aware, Reshef is not a word. As the Japanese title means something like "Great Evil God of Destruction," I just wanted to make sure that "Reshef" is intentional, and not some kind of weird mistake. LordAmeth 23:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reshef?
Talk:Kak clan

message: Kak as a gotra of Jats has been described by the Indian Historian RS Joon in his book "History of the Jats, Rohtak, India (1938, 1967)". As such there is no justification of deletion of this article. burdak 02:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cannot tell if the first subject in this article is identical to the newly-added second subject. If it is, a merge should be performed, but I am probably not the person to do it. -- Omicronpersei8 14:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions as of June 27

message: :Kak clan →  – In almost all cited sources word surname mentioned not clan so present target location is appropriate.2404:3100:1898:1CE7:1:0:F890:CF1F (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 June 2024
Talk:New Politics (1950s)

message: I am unacquainted with the usage identified as the first within American politics, that is, "New Politics" being descriptive of the Stevensonian Democrats. I am aware only of the second usage which identified the McCarthy-
Kennedy Democrats in 1968. I know that the McCarthy campaigners sometimes identified themselves as the New Stevensonians. A Source for the first usage would be helpful. LAWinans (talk) 23:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for Usage

message: If someone more versed in Wikipedia would set up a disambiguation page here it would be a real service (see under See Also on this page for multiple other uses).--Thirdcamper (talk) 13:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done that.  There didn't seem to be much on the 1968 usage which could make an article, but the details are in the article history, if anyone feels that they are able to write that article. Warofdreams talk 13:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  Terrific!--Thirdcamper (talk) 14:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: The title narrowly identifies the term with the 1950s. Yet, the term persisted at least into the early 1970s. It was applied to the U.S. senate campaign of Joseph Duffey. Duffey was the chair and president of the Americans for Democratic Action, whose left-liberal orientation was consistent with this article's description of 'new politics.'Dogru144 (talk) 17:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Problematic periodization in title
Talk:U.S. Route 165

message: North end & South end were reversed.  Corrected.  --Josephdurnal (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 165 originally ended at US 65 near Demott, but was later extended to North Little Rock along parts of AR 11 and AR 130. — Preceding unsigned comment added by US 71 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: US 165 in Arkansas
Talk:U.S. Route 166

message: I just re-removed content, and I agree with others that it isn't appropriate here. I mentioned three reasons, and I'll expound here better.
#It's overly detailed. A good highway history section details the changes made to the routing to arrive at the current condition. We don't need such an explication of the old routing. Some of the details as written are just too much (the hay bales, physical descriptions of specific buildings, specific business names and addresses, etc) and really I don't think we need all of the street names of the old highway alignment. Also, that much text for just two counties in one of the states? Sorry, but that's overkill.
#It reads like Original Research. Again, some of the details here can only come from someone driving the roadway, not based upon information gleaned from published sources, like maps. 
#It's full of inappropriate or improper external links. We don't use external links inline. If a subject is going to be linked, it should be linked to its Wikipedia article. If it lacks an article, we'll have a redlink. We don't use an external link instead. Such links only belong inside references or at the end of the article in the external links section.
Imzadi 1979 →  22:26, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is also WP:NOT a travel guide. --Rschen7754 05:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing content
Talk:U.S. Route 67

message: Can someone start a U.S. Route 67 in Texas article? Currently there are two sections of this highway in Texas that are freeways, one in San Angelo, Texas and the other from Midlothian, Texas to Dallas. There is about to be a third in Cleburne, Texas on the Cleburne Bypass/Catherine P. Raines Drive. Work started around November 2010 and should be complete around mid to late 2013. The improvements include extending the highway from 2 to 4 lanes, making it a divided highway, and building interchanges. Mes tex (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. Route 67 in Texas

message: Whoever came up with "Throughout Texas, US 67 runs from north to south, in a primarily east–west manner" is a genius.Rolypole (talk) 05:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wonderful
Talk:U.S. Route 167

message: Per WP:USRD/NT, "A highway should have sizable and notable spans in at least 3 jurisdictions before creating sub articles. There are a few instances where highways that only cross two jurisdictions may merit sub articles; however, these should be discussed on a case-by-case basis."  This is that discussion. –Fredddie™ 03:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[U.S. Route 167 in Louisiana]]
Talk:U.S. Route 68

message: This page hadn't been touched in 5 or 6 months and was very empty, so I drafted a little something from the KY end.  I couldn't seem to avoid it sounding like a tourism plug no matter how hard I tried so I dropped an "authors note" into the body.  As stated in the history comments: if that note needs to be moved to the discussion page I'm ok with that; it was more to add additional credability when sources were not available online.
-TiaF, Campbellsville, KY 11 Oct 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.28.230.9 (talk) 00:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Okpik

message: Does anyone think this article should be moved to Okpik (Northern Tier) or something like that to avoid confusion? Dustimagic 03:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, I don't have a strong feeling one way or another.  --Emb021 21:34, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it's fine how it is. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 01:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd rather see this become an article on the Okpik program in general with Northern Tier as a section. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 01:53, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Category talk:Musical keys

message: Two issues I want to bring up to anyone else interested in this category. 
1. Stylistically, I had been taught in music theory classes to capitalize the tonic of major scales and place the tonic of minor scales in lower case--D major but b minor. Does anyone agree/disagree, and can this be done in Wikipedia given that the title of the b minor page will probably come out capitalized anyway? 
:This is certainly true in German. The German Wikipedia articles on the minor keys all have little messages saying things like "Der korrekte Titel dieses Artikels lautet „d-Moll“. Leider ist dieser Titel in der Wikipedia aufgrund technischer Einschränkungen nicht möglich." But in English it has become common practice to capitalize the pitch class letter even for minor keys. Concert programmes for major American orchestras (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, etc.) are fairly consistent in this. If a British music-lover can confirm this for British orchestras, I think that the English Wikipedia should stick to capitalizing pitch class letters. Volunteer Sibelius Salesman 17:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I will look that page over. Volunteer Sibelius Salesman 17:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 comments
Talk:Linguistic separatism

message: Linguistic separatism refers to the attempts of linguists or politicians to create an independent language from a dialect by splitting off the written language.
This could be confusing and needs rewording. The lack of a distinction between a language and a dialect should be noted, "standardised" might be a better word than "independent" maybe? Otherwise very neutral, presents both sides well. - FrancisTyers 03:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: Would be an interesting one to cover. - FrancisTyers 13:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bulgarian/Macedonian

message: Here a few suggestions:
* Let's redirect linguistic separatism toward language secessionism. The latter title is more widely used and conceptualized in sociolinguistics, since it has received a large amout of academic litterature, especially from the Catalan Countries.
* Le'ts copy the short, current contents of the article about linguistic separatism and let's paste it in the beginning of the long article about language secessionism, and let's name this new beginning section "General features".
* Let's give the references and sources requested in this "General features" section. It will be quite easy. I can manage it.--Aubadaurada 11:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have done this. - Francis Tyers · 09:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging [[language secessionism]] and [[linguistic separatism]]