Talk:Jan Crouch

message: This article, as it stands, is meaningless - made up of isolated critical incidents that hold little or no value in the context of such a short article.  While I am not opposed (necessarily) to such facts being included in an article, the wording here, the context (or lack thereof), and the style are indicative more of a mud-sling than an encyclopedia entry.  I hope someone who is more knowledgeable of this woman's life and work could write a more worthy contribution.  --SeekingOne 00:10, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
:I don't know-- I get the impression that, like most other tele-evangelists, she and her husband are crooks of the highest order. How do you say something nice about common thieves? For now I'm going to remove the NPOV tag, since obviously nobody feels strongly enough about her to "correct" any issues with the POV of the article. -Locke Cole 19:40, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Your own reasons for taking away the disclaimer are so POV that they would seem to be disqualified. --SeekingOne 03:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Dispute

message: I don't believe Jan Crouch deserves her own article.  Everything she accomplished on behalf of TBN was a joint enterprise with her husband, Paul.  Most of the criticisms here are also mentioned in the Paul Crouch and TBN articles.  I would vote to merge the articles on Jan Crouch and Paul Crouch into one article, similar to the joint article on Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold as everything they have done has been done together. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.187.32.186 (talk • contribs) .
Tell you what Seekingone.   If you disagree with the content of this entry, do some solid primary-source-based research, and then post it here.  I think that is the holistic point of wikipedia in general
:The article has long since been edited since my last comments here. --SeekingOne 20:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Articles

message: How can this article even exist with no mention of how Mrs. Crouch hair has risen and fallen and risen yet higher over the years?
:And, is that her natural haircolor? Codenamemary (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just coming here to see if anyone had mentioned it. What a totally rediculous amount of hair that woman has.... Jalwikip (talk) 10:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jan Crouch's Hair

message: I'm a christian and let me say that many many of us don't endorse nor like, Jan Crouch and TBN. That network teaches an assortment of heresies instead of biblical teaching, and gives to many non-christian people a reason to stay away from God. What a pity, I think the article don't say anything about the controversy about this person and it should do it.
 signed a christian
--201.230.62.38 (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the controversy surrounding the teaching of those the network broadcasts is dealt with in the main TBN article.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Shall we keep religious wars to a minimum here, people? Thanks. Jalwikip (talk) 10:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: added a current outline of jan crouches work and accomplishments,including awards from the UN for Smile of a Child Foundation. updated financial info on charity navigator to 2010. added sources. removed negative comments on Jan's hair preference, as this has no place on Wiki.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellen Brichetto (talk • contribs) 17:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Bio and Sources

message: can be found here. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on Merging Jan Crouch's article with Paul Crouch.