Template talk:Pp-usertalk

message: 
This template, as it is, is basically a laundry list of ways to disrupt Wikipedia and make this sort of protection needed. Can we just replace the whole list with "making disruptive edits" or similar? GracenotesT § 01:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --ais523 11:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Way too specific

message: The superscript looks weird, would normal or small text be better?...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 17:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The template just itself calls , which produces  given a username (here "Example"). I'm unsure of to what we should change it in that case (partly as I don't particularly find it wierd); do you have any suggestions for improvement? Nihiltres{t.l} 04:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also don't think it looks wierd, and there's nothing that can be changed in this template to alter the appearance anyway. Happy‑melon 11:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superscript 

message: Hi. I'm trying to understand this template. If a user abuses their own talk page, can't they be blocked from editing it as a block option without the need to protect the talk page? --Bsherr (talk) 16:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: Go to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#WP:Accessability  ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 22:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Come back when you have consensus... —GFOLEY FOUR— 05:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Change:
|small={{{small|}}}
|demospace={{{demospace|}}}
To:
|small={{{small|}}}
|right={{{right|}}}
|demospace={{{demospace|}}}
This allows use of the new pp-meta parameter.
Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 25 August 2013 

message: I've created a version in the sandbox which will work for both semi and full protection (also see this). Would a template editor/admin please check the code and copy it over. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 1 February 2014 

message: ­This redirect needs an Rcat (redirect category template) added.  Please modify it as follows:
*from this... 
#REDIRECT Template:pp-semi-usertalk
Category:Protection templates
*to this...
#REDIRECT Template:Pp-usertalk

Category:Protection templates
* 
This will defeat a double redirect (Template:Pp-semi-usertalk also redirects to Template:Pp-usertalk) and update the category populations.  Template  is a shortcut for the  template, which is itself a shortcut used to add categories to redirects.  Thank you in advance! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 19:17, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 20:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you, Redrose64!  Joys! – Paine Ellsworth CLIMAX! 22:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 7 February 2014 

message: I'm not sure which part of the code the problem lies, but the second template (the one for semi-protected) has a redundant request unprotection link at the end. Could someone fix it?
Pizza1016 (talk | contribs | uploads | logs) 10:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:46, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! :-) I'm making localizations of the template and it was bothering me. Pizza1016 (talk | contribs | uploads | logs) 12:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 5 May 2014 

message: There is currently a proposal to convert this and other protection templates to Lua at Module talk:Protection banner#Proposal to convert all protection templates to use this module. Please join this discussion over there if you are interested. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 23:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to convert this template to Lua