Talk:Nuveen

message: Have not done much research, but a note on my U.S. Bank HSA account reads:
 A note for HSA investors: effective December 31, 2010, Nuveen Investments acquired the non-money-market mutual
 funds from First American Funds (FAF) Advisors, Inc. As a result, the affected First American Funds have been
 renamed to reflect the Nuveen Family of Funds name. FAF Advisors, Inc. will continue to serve as the advisor
 on the money market fund and retain the name of First American Prime Obligation Fund.
Anyone have better details? Shouldn't this go into the article? Samatva (talk) 00:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First American Funds 

message: Should the article retain the large section containing unsourced/poorly sourced negative statements as they stood prior to my deletion of them? - John Galt ✉ 05:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your claims of "weasel wording" are lies and attempts to poison the well. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 15:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Get off your high horse, and stop playing wiki-games. What's next - a personal appeal to Jimbo to give you special permission to blank the article to appease Nuveen?  If you were interested in improving the article, you would have done so by now, rather than engage in futile AN/I petitions, and in RFCs asking "Should the article retain X". At least be honest about what you want, and ask, "Should the article contain criticism?". You've been editing wiki long enough to know that the more you play such games, the more editors get involved, and the more likely the article is to be made neutral -- both praise and criticism. Despite what you may think, that's a good thing. Owen× ☎ 17:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're a liar and a well poisoner. Fortunately for you, you have a lot of company here in that respect. If YOU had been interested in a "neutral and balanced" article, you would have made it so. I tagged that article 7 months ago. Instead, you've been reverting various edits to this article for years and doing nothing to improve the quality. Furthermore, take your assumptions of bad faith and shove them. I don't work for the Nuveen company, nor do I know very much detail about them, apart from their being a part of the mutual funds industry. Contrary to what you seem to think, article editing is not reserved for "experts" or special people, and it doesn't require an expert to see when something is grossly POV and weighted down with negative claims. The quality of the article before versus after wasn't the point, the point is, you WANT the heavy negativity in there. You can say and think whatever you like, but you are the personification of everything wrong with Wikipedia: assumptions of bad faith, owning articles, and arrogant attitudes towards "outsiders". Whenever I think of someone like you I image Comic Book Guy from The Simpsons: a socially-incompetent weakling who behaves in arrogant manner to people on the internet as compensation. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 19:10, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC 

message: This is a reboot of an improper RFC previously created. The purpose of this RFC is to evaluate the best process to handle the WP:UNDUE concerns regarding the Auction rate securities section of Nuveen Investments. Tiggerjay (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: From my initial review it seems like a large portion of the section needs to be retained, with some extensive copy editing. However, that leaves the problem of WP:UNDUE. This can be resolved in a couple of ways. The first would be to have extensive efforts to improve the overall content of the article/company as a whole. With their overall age, there should be a lot that could/should be written about it using reliable sources -- although many of those are probably offline resources. A second alternative would be to consider creating a new article for the specific ARS situation or merge into Auction Rate Security page, while leaving a summary and redirect on this page. Tiggerjay (talk) 21:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Decent starting point but I would not keep the sentence about ARS in the lede. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 17:39, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I put your draft in as it is obviously much better and there is consensus for undue. I also trimmed some of the unsourced promotionalism in the article. However, out of the three paragraphs now in the article for the controversy, I think the second unsourced paragraph could still be trimmed. User:CorporateM 20:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC Reboot 

message: Updated AUM information available here:
http://www.nuveen.com/Home/Corporate/About/Products.aspx
More on Nuveen's history:
http://www.nuveen.com/MutualFunds/WhyNuveen/OurHistory.aspx
http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/the-john-nuveen-company-history/
More on capabilities of Nuveen affiliates:
http://www.nuveen.com/Home/Corporate/About/CorporateCapabilities.aspx
Portocac13 (talk) 19:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the AUM, but as for the rest, you need to propose specific, non-promotional sentences in an edit request. It would be better to rely upon outside sources instead of Nuveen's own website. Altamel (talk) 06:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nuveen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226035915/http://www.forbes.com:80/markets/2007/06/20/dearborn-nuveen-buy-markets-equity-cx_cg_0620markets51.html to http://www.forbes.com/markets/2007/06/20/dearborn-nuveen-buy-markets-equity-cx_cg_0620markets51.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081007140807/http://www.NUVEEN.com/ResourceCenter/AuctionRatePreferred/AuctionRatePreferred.aspx to http://www.nuveen.com/ResourceCenter/AuctionRatePreferred/AuctionRatePreferred.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723035011/http://www.nuveen.com/etf/web_files/Closed-End%20Exchange-Traded%20Funds/Update%20discussion%2015Oct08.pdf to http://www.nuveen.com/etf/web_files/Closed-End%20Exchange-Traded%20Funds/Update%20discussion%2015Oct08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi – My name is Jake Holtgrewe, and I work on digital and social media strategy for Nuveen. We noticed that several elements of Nuveen’s Wikipedia page are becoming outdated, and I wanted to see what we can do to help provide more current information around such items as assets under management, descriptions of our business, etc. Given Wikipedia’s guidelines around self-editing, I imagine it would be more appropriate to include the relevant facts/updates on the discussion page rather than making edits directly to the site itself. 
As a starting point, I would direct people to this recent article in Barrons (http://www.barrons.com/articles/tiaa-nuveen-a-trillion-dollar-startup-is-making-its-move-1491623875), which includes the following statistics/updates:
* As a description of our firm, I would suggest: “Nuveen is the asset management arm of TIAA, which purchased Nuveen in 2014.” 
:: Altamel (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Altamel (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure about this item. I've seen many different methodologies for ranking mutual fund companies by size, and they all have different results. Wells Fargo also claims to be the 15th largest mutual fund company. Altamel (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine we will look to substantiate this in the future. Jholtgrewe (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

text: I've searched the web and SEC EDGAR filings to substantiate this figure, but to no avail. Can you provide any sources to confirm? Altamel (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I am still working on finding a source for this. Jholtgrewe (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

text: Hi Jholtgrewe. Sorry for the delay, I've reviewed your edits. Altamel (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Altamel.  I apologize for the delay in getting back to you but I really appreciate your help with this.  Please see my responses. You will also see that I went ahead and added a section for Sponsorships.  I added the appropriate references but please let me know if you need anything else for this.  I have pictures of the sign to include but not the proper rights to upload - any thoughts?  Thanks! Jholtgrewe (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Information