Talk:Abraham Stavsky

message: Yeah, this just won't due. Aside for the misrepresentation of the Altalena story, the final sentence in this piece implies strongly that Stavsky actually did kill Arlosoroff - despite the fact that he was eventually acquitted of that killing. 
There's also the issue of the whitewash of Stavsky's activities sneaking Jews into Israel despite the British blockade, etc, etc. My experience however has been that there's small interest in keeping such facts on record among many wikipedians who hang out in Irgun-related quarters so for now I'll simply remove the nonsensical bit at the end that plays superstitious games with the Arlosoroff affair in attempt to unfairly sway people's opinions, facts be damned.
:Your interpretation is incorrect. The location of Stavsky's death does not imply that he killed Arlosoroff. Stavsky was suspected of and arrested for the murder of Arlosoroff, and even if he's innocent, he was identified with that murder. So it is an interesting fact to note that he died close to the spot of Arlosoroff's murder, that's all. I think that this coincidence can be mentioned in the article, but I left it out for the moment.
:Regarding his Aliyah activities, you are of course welcome to add any relevant information to the article.
:There's also the misrepresentation of the Altalena story, of course. I corrected it too.
:Thanks, -- Gabi S. (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Once again S Brodsky introduces his agenda with less than subliminal assertions - Stavsky was "Murdered" by the Palmach "under the direction" of Yizchak Rabin who later "bragged" about it.  The insistence of SB by virtue of continous and ongoing editing of this entry, and his refusal to be confused by facts is consistent with the right wing position that led to the assasination of Rabin, justification thereof and appeals for the release of a corrupt and demented vicious Yigal Amir.
If there was any confirmation that Wikipedia is unreliable twisted source of information, the editing of Seva Brodsky no doubt are indeed most symbolic of that abberation.  I can state from personal experience and observation that the vicious context with which the Right Wing Absolutists propagate their "facts" has not changed in the past 70 years.  
Further evidence of the validity of editing made by S Brodsky are below - copied from a failed Federal law suit by S Brodsky 
...Seva Brodsky (“Brodsky”), alleges that from 2003 until 2005, he was a student at the defendant New England
School of Law (“NESL”) and prior to that an electronic and software engineer for 16 years. In the spring of 2005, he
received failing grades in two courses, Constitutional Law and Criminal Procedure, after which he was expelled.
Following his expulsion Brodsky underwent a neuropsychological exam with Dr. Rimma Kovalcik (“Dr. Kovalcik”)
which revealed that he suffers from memory and organizational deficits “consistent with long-term damage to the brain,”
I ask that you view his ongoing "editing" with the perspective S Brodsky himself offers about his qualifications.
EBenedict November 28, 2010 23:25
—Preceding unsigned comment added by EBenedict (talk • contribs) 17:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ==================================