lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Military Order of Maria Theresa

message: The current version of this article states that in "1765, Emperor Joseph II added the Commander's Cross and the Knight Cross 2nd class." I believe this is incorrect, as Joseph II added the Commander's Cross and a star to be worn on the breast by holders of the Grand Cross. A Knight Cross 2nd class did not exist. What DID exist were special Knight Crosses with diamonds which were presented particularly by Emperor Francis Joseph I. (1848-1916) to Knight Cross holders who held the cross for 50 years and over. (Source: Exhibition of the Austrian Mint and the Austrian Orders Research Society, july 23rd-January 24th, 2003, Vienna)
I therefore request that the sentence "On October 15, 1765, Emperor Joseph II, added the Commander's Cross and the Knight Cross 2nd class." be changed to "On October 15, 1765, Emperor Joseph II, added the Commander's Cross and a breast star to be worn with the Grand Cross."
81.146.41.112 (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:National Order of Vietnam

message: Sharon Ann Lane was the only American woman in the military to be killed in combat in Vietnam when she was struck by shrapnel from a 122mm rocket.  From what I've read she received the National Order of Vietnam medal.  American military enlisted personnel would receive the Vietnamese Medal of Military Merit when KIA but the medal was restricted to enlisted persons only.  As a 1st Lt. Sharon Ann Lane received the National Order of Vietnam medal, although on The Virtual Wall they show her receiving the Military Merit medal instead.  She was a nurse, from Canton, Ohio and was only 25 when she died.  She also received the Bronze Star with Combat "V" and the Vietnam Cross of Gallantry medal, as well as the Purple Heart.  209.77.229.16 (talk) 05:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no information regarding Ms. Lane, but as for it being for enlisted's only, I know of at least one case of an American officer having this award- then Col. Robert H. Barrow, later Commandant of the Marine Corps. cheers, Gecko G (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharon Ann Lane 
Talk:Order of Bogdan Khmelnitsky

message: I'm removing the section about Jewish soldiers, for a couple of reasons. First, the reference seems likely to be bogus, its only one person who is brining this up, rather then some large organization or veterans group. Second the story is almost certainly made up, as the section said, the Order of Bogdan Khmelnitsy was only created nearly 2 years after the battle in question. Lastly, this is one of the foremost awards in the Soviet Union and now in Ukraine, if something like this is to be added there needs to be a lot of good references that a controversy actually exists.Sotnik (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing a section 

message: There seems to be an inconsistency between the article name and text. Anyone knows about ukrainian transliteration? Cumulus (talk) 09:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ukrainian transliteration would be Bohdan Khmelnytsky, while the current one is Russian. —dima/talk/ 16:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogdan or Bohdan?
Talk:Freeze (b-boy move)

message: I move that the name of this article and other articles with (breakdance move) in the title be retitled to (bboying moves) to reflect the merging of the bboying and breakdancing articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.82.143 (talk) 03:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I oppose deletion. The freeze is a well-known class of breakdance moves. It's cross-referenced in multiple B-boying articles. I'll try to add some outside sources. - Draeco (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Order of Leopold (Belgium)

message: This article needs reworking now that King Albert II has abdicated in favour of his elder son, who is now King Philip I. Tonymec (talk) 04:54, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking needed 
Talk:Order of New Zealand

message: I'm sorry if the undo operation caused offence. If there was not any other widely used system (see Order of Merit, Order of the Companions of Honour, Order of Australia, etc...) then there would have been no change, but becuase there seems to be a standard formatting going on, I undid it. It was nothing against the table, or you... 202.89.152.147 23:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabulation 

message: I'm confused.  Some ONZs are "Sir" or "Dame", others are not.  Why the difference?  --  JackofOz (talk) 09:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Scrub that.  I've worked it out.  Some are Knight Bachelors, which carries no postnominal.  --  JackofOz (talk) 09:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sir/Dame or not

message: Sir Brian Lochore is in Deaths in 2019 and must be moved from the living to deceased Additional Members.
However,older revisions show him as ahead of Sir Paul Reeves when both were alive,yet there is no gap in the numbering among deceased members said to be consecutive since the Order's inception that would allow him to be slotted ahead of Reeves.12.144.5.2 (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the entry. Deceased members are sorted by date of appointment and then date of death. Schwede66 20:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relocating Lochore 

message: What is the difference between ordinary and additional members, apart from additional members being appointed to commemorate specific occasions? When there is an exclusive limit of 20 ordinary members, what is the point of additional members, for which there is seemingly no limit? I know this page is not the place for general discussion of the topic, but I would expect the article to cover it. Nurg (talk) 23:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional members
Talk:Order of Ouissam Alaouite

message: The picture of the diploma with wich he was awarded is on Commons: --Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ernesto Burzagli

message: His ward is on Commons too: --Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Perez Perez
Talk:Order of Saint Maurice (United States)

message: Is there a position in the US Army called "Chief of Infantry"? I've not heard of it. MayerG (talk) 02:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *Did you just ask a question, then answer it yourself 20 mins later? Niteshift36 (talk) 03:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chief of Infantry"? 

message: There have been less than 20 recipients for the metal, apparently this number is at the highest level of it, because the base article points to a lot more. I included John Russell in the photo gallery because apparently he received the top version of it (1 of 14) at the date of the article.
This article says there are 14, but the category has 17. Did the three receive them after the article?
British Army Maj. John Russell from Chalford, Gloucestershire, England, awarded Order of Saint Maurice for contributions to infantry. (2008)
Alrich44 (talk) 11:45, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable 

message: He should be added to the recipient list if verified to be a recipient 2600:1011:B1CE:A549:A831:6B84:42AD:D3CE (talk) 06:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Minihan, USAF is not listed as a recipient but his wiki bio states he was a recipient
Talk:Order of St. Andrew

message: :Latin letters 'SAPR' ('St. Andrew, Protector of Russia')
Wouldn't the Latin saying serve better here? While the initials in Latin do match the saying in English, it should be given as a translation of the Latin saying, if at all.--Slowlikemolasses (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin 
Talk:Order of Saint Vladimir

message: Doesn't Maria also award an Order of St Vladimir, in her role as the head of the House of Romanov?  Isn't it the real order, rather than the award which had Soviet approval? Saint Vlad (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grand Duchess Maria

message: As this article is about different decorations, I suggest splitting it.--Reciprocist (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split?
Talk:Order of the Crown (Belgium)

message: The second sentence in the lede contains a rather odd phrase: "It is considered in diplomatic traffic as a gift of very high value."  (odd phrase bolded)  I think I understand what is intended: that within the diplomatic community, or perhaps in diplomatic circles, the award is highly regarded, or some such.  "Diplomatic traffic" sounds to me like it would refer to communication between diplomats and their State Departments.  Also a bit strange is the phrase "a gift of very high value" since membership in the Order isn't so much a "gift" as an award, and "high value" implies intrinsic value (e.g., the market value, if one were selling it).  Can anyone shed any light on this? Bricology (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward phrase in lede 
Talk:Ilium (bone)

message: It is needlessly fragmented to have separate articles, when these could easily be displayed on a single article. This would allow for content to be better integrated, provide more context, and enhance the readability of the article.
I have also proposed the above merge. LT910001 (talk) 23:45, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Wing of ilium]] 

message: This article is not readable by modern-day nonanatomists. At all. It also is structured along the lines of the material from which it was copied (most likely written in the early 1900s). Nobody today is even capable of writing in this style. Nobody. And few alive today are capable of comprehending it, either. The absence of illustrations which reference the article's terminology makes this problem worse.
The entire structure of this article is aimed at a nonexistent audience. What is the significance of the ilium in the context of today's general reader? This article has no clue.
Please, some knowledgeable writer, try to tackle this subject with a new article. The utility of a rewrite is quite low. Start from scratch.--75.164.155.194 (talk) 00:45, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  speaking of readability...
Talk:Cthulhu (film)

message: Is this an April Fool's joke? For one thing, it makes little sense. It looks as if random elements from the Cthulhu Mythos have been jumbled together. Dubious info recently removed. RlyehRising 04:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible April Fool's joke 

message: What is needed to remove the notverified tag?  It's at imdb, there's an official website with a trailer, and a blog that disucsses filming.  User:Zoe|(talk) 15:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Factoid transferred back to article RlyehRising 02:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cast transferred back to article RlyehRising 02:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

text: What I would really like to see is a verifiable reference from a published source — such as a film magazine article.-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 21:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put that cast list in there, based on imdb.  User:Zoe|(talk) 01:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

text: *OK, in that case, back it goes... I found the relevant citation here at full credits. Based on the cast (with mention of names like "Zadok" and "Reverend Marsh"), the movie does appear to be based on "The Shadow Over Innsmouth".Postscript. This may be one of the few instances in which an article that starts off as a prank actually becomes a legitimate Wikipedia article!-,-~R'lyehRising~-,- 02:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not verified?

message: This article should be split into two articles, Cthulhu (2000 film) for the first Australian film, and Cthulhu (2006 film) for the second film. This will better match the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films).<BR />—Asatruer 03:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!—Ketil Trout (<><!) 02:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Article Split
Talk:Lytvyn Bloc

message: External link doesn't work, are you sure it is the right one? Mariah-Yulia 16:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External link
Talk:Futsal in Australia

message: I just noticed the content of the Futsal section at Football (soccer) in Australia has completely different info to this article (that I just created).  I may be introducing my own systemic bias!  Just letting people know that it wasn't intentional and will be merging/correcting soon. -- Chuq 03:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The paragraph about Vikings is a direct copy-paste from http://vikingsfutsal.sportzvault.com/ - perhaps this could be rewritten from someone with knowledge on the subject, or alternatively deleted? Thrapper (talk) 08:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vikings 
Wikipedia talk:Korea-related topics notice board/Announcements

message: ===Housekeeping tasks===
It would be great to make housekeeping a semiannual, semi-organized event.  In a housekeeping drive, we go through all items on the List of Korea-related topics as well as all items included in :Category:Korea, and make sure that all items are up to code.   Let's make a list of tasks here that should be covered.  -- Visviva 06:25, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not exactly December anymore, but I think I'm almost ready to get started.  Anyone with a broom or a shovel is welcome to join.  -- Visviva 13:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive

message: It would be great to make housekeeping a semiannual, semi-organized event.  In a housekeeping drive, we go through all items on the List of Korea-related topics as well as all items included in :Category:Korea, and make sure that all items are up to code.   Let's make a list of tasks here that should be covered.  -- Visviva 06:25, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not exactly December anymore, but I think I'm almost ready to get started.  Anyone with a broom or a shovel is welcome to join.  -- Visviva 13:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Housekeeping tasks

message: As if we didn't have enough lists of redlinks, something possessed me to type up all the names listed in Yonhap's "Who's Who in North Korea."  See Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/North Korea/Whonk.  Out of 314 items I now count 5 blue links, including the one I just created.  (Come to think of it, our coverage of prominent figures in South Korean govt isn't much better).  Anyway, I fear it will be a while before I get around to creating the other 309 articles, so if anyone wants to improve our NK coverage, here's a great place to start. :-) -- Visviva 13:17, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: North Koreans

message: I hope I am posting in the correct spot. I have created :Category:Korean terms (compare at the, IMHO, ridiculously underpopulated :Category:Spanish loanwords and overinclusive :Category:Chinese terms). I inserted the obvious articles; several others (e.g. noraebang) are redirects to more familiar non-Korean terms. - choster 06:45, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Korean terms category

message: Could someone more knowledgeable on the subject please chip in on the discussion? - Mgm|(talk) 11:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD: [[Purelyn]] 

message: Can this person be found using Korean net searches? 
Are voice actors who dub American shows notable in Korea? - Mgm|(talk) 12:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD: [[Bak_Sin_Hee]] (a voice actor)

message: Someone moved several Korea-related pages. For example, he moved Kim Young-sam to Gim Yeongsam, and Chun Doo-hwan to Jeon Duhwan. Please see Special:Contributions/%C2%A7 -- ChongDae 22:54, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for revert moves.
Talk:Nucleosome core particle

message: I suggest that this article be merged (i.e. deleted) into the much more encompassing Nucleosome article.  Much of what is written there would simply have to be repeated here.  And the "Core particle" is described there as a subset of the information presented.  Any comments?  Would there be any opposition to remove the content here (which is already represented there) and place a simple redirect to that article?  -RockyRaccoon 03:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Into Nucleosome Article?
Talk:Washington High School (Fremont, California)

message: This thing requires a lot of cleanup especially the: - . Some current Graduates that have or are looking to extend their career in football this next year are:
class of 2005:   
Paul Taufalele-class of 2005, Chabot Junior College transfer to unknown.   
Tyler Layfield-class of 2005, unknown.   
   
class of 2006:   
Jeff Revay-class of 2006, unknown.   
Greg Fryan-class of 2006, playing at Chabot Junior College.   
Jason Freeman-class of 2006, gray-shirted first year at Chabot Junior College.   
   
Class of 2007:   
Jason Tawiah-class of 2007, unknown.   
Jaime Barrera-class of 2007, College of San Mateo.   
Justin Montes-class of 2007, College of San Mateo.   
Bryan Beall-class of 2007, College of San Mateo.   
Brian Reeb-class of 2007, Laney College.   
John Dallas (football)-class of 2007, Laney College.   
Daniel Ayers-class of 2007, Laney College.   
Kevin Tobin (football)-class of 2007, Laney College.   
Tony Martens-class of 2007, Maritime Acamdemy of th U.S. Merchant Marines. 
Kenny Durbin-class of 2007, Oregon State University.  
The 2007 football team should be returning to shape and finishing in or near the top of the league.Missionimpossible 04:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: None of these names link to notable people. i will leave this comment here for historic purposes. The article should not detail the teams to this level.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup  

message: Elizabeth Weiss, of San Francisco, graduated from Washington High School (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F13Kdcvz57w).  Is this Washington High that she went to? Kdammers (talk) 05:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth Weiss?
Talk:Mount Churchill

message: I didn't know how or where to insert this; maybe in the opening paragraph concerning the White River Ash; see this article in UpHere magazine, from Yellowknife, concerning one archaeologist's theory about why the Dineh (Navajo) moved south from what appears to have been their former domicile in the Nahanni area....(note the name similarity)....figured it's more than signficant enough to include here and in teh White River Ash article.....Skookum1 (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: White River Ash re [[Dene]]/[[Dineh]]

message: We can see the location on the map, but if we click the map, there is no longer a location indicator. Tallard (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The clicked map does not show location 

message: While this source draws a link between a volcano in the White River region and legends of volcanic activity, the primary source does not seem to refer to the White River region. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legends 

message: Parking this source here b/c from the later sources it seems like there is stronger support for a link between the Dene migration and the 2nd White River Ash. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, this probably needs careful writing: A Multiscalar Consideration of the Athabascan Migration does argue that the Athabaskan migration was due to demographic shifts, but Power, security, and exchange: Impacts of a Late Holocene volcanic eruption in Subarctic North America says that evidence for a volcanic forcing is still good. From reading other recent sources, it seems like there is a consensus that the volcano "probably"/"may" have played a role in the Athabaskan migration, so leaving the article unchanged for now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly outdated study 

message: This list may include sources not yet used that could be used. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of publications compiled by AVO
Talk:Post riders

message: Please contstruct pages in your namepage, sandbox, or even in a text file on your computer. Don't create pages like this. Some guy 03:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And exactly what policy would I be violating then, son? --DV8 2XL 08:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Son? ... Anyway, nevermind, I thought you wrote that note up there yourself, but I realize now it's a tag. I'd never seen it before. My apologies. Some guy 14:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: GO ahead and take them out, your right they don't look good like that --DV8 2XL 21:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kishua Zelretch Schweinorg

message: I'm not even sure if Zeltrech is the correct way to spell his name.  Regardless, if someone can please help me explain Zeltrech's powers better for me, that would be great.  The only way I could describe it was it being a "mini-Excalibur" like weapon.  Thanks. Mirioki 01:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is correct... I think I was just making a quick little subsection for the weapon "Zelretch" to differentiate from the character "Zelretch". I'll go change that to be more specific Mirioki 20:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zelretch (Knife) 
Talk:Chuon Nath

message: Google says the spelling could be "Chuon Nath" or "Chuon-Nath". --Fang Aili  說嗎? 03:54, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nokoreach says "Chuon Nat". --Fang Aili  說嗎? 03:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Choun Nath or Chuon Nath: According to status placed at Cambodia Cultural Village in Siem Reap, the right spelling should be Chuon Nath. Here is the picture of Chuon Nath there I took in 2007 at http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/85/Choun_Nath.jpg , Best Regards. --Kiensvay(talk) 08:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone may want to link up the reign box thingy with that of the one on the article of Preah Maha Ghosananda. See also: Supreme Patriarch of Cambodia --Dara 23:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sangharaja 
Talk:Model 302 telephone

message: I have a 302 whose parts all date from 1949; hence, I have changed the terminal date from 1948 to 1949. Gamahucheur 03:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Final Manufacture

message: I suggest that if-and-when there are a fair number of articles on the various models of subscriber sets, there be a merging into a single, larger article, which individual model pages becoming redirects. —Gamahucheur 06:54, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate Combination? 

message: I dispute the description of the picture.  To me, that does not look like an authentic Western Electric 302.  In particular, I notice that the fingerstop is at the 5 o'clock position (as Automatic Electric used), rather than the 3 o'clock position that was typical for Western Electric.
:Well, that's what it is (I am the dfsfsdfsdfsdssdfdsfsdfdfsowner of the phone), although it has an Automatic Electric dial, as this was probably a military-spec phone and they required AE dials for whatever reason. If you have a picture of one with a WE dial, please upload it; I own a couple of these, though they're on the other side of the Atlantic from me at the moment.  ProhibitOnions  (T) 16:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This phone strongly resembles the Federal Telephone & Radio model 802, which is very close to the 302, cosmetically. Apart from the AE dial, you can confirm it to be the FT&R model if the cords for the handset and for the line both come out the rear of the base. On the WE 302, the handset cord comes out the side, while the line cord comes out the rear. Delbert Grady 16:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean the FTR model 803, but yes, that phone pictured is definitely the FTR model and not the WECO model. The military loved to buy FTR (and later Cortelco... same parent company: ITT) phones as they were marketed as being much more sturdy than the Western Electric. Hard to believe, I know, but FTR did go to such lengths with the 803 as sealing the induction coil inside a bakelite case inside, covering all exposed internal wires, supplying dust-covers for the dial plate, etc. Saturn 5 20:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Does anyone know when coiled handset cords were first available?
BMJ-pdx (talk) 15:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did coiled handset cords first appear?