Talk:Common sunflower

message: The Heliotropism section mentions "The heliotropic motion of the bud is performed by the pulvinus, a flexible segment just below the bud, due to reversible changes in turgor pressure, which occurs without growth". How is turgor pressured changed actively by the plant? Is the citation for the line the same as the citation for the previous sentence? If not, what is the source?
Thank you in advance to whoever holds the knowledge and responds.
冷雾 (talk) 00:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heliotropism 

message: what do they get out of it? is this known? guessed by relevant public work? I myself would even take a clue, here. (thats I really wanna get info on this) Bye and thanks. Pablo2garcia 00:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heliotropic flowers are more prevalent among plants in alpine areas. The absorbed light makes the flowers warmer, which attracts more pollinating insects. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00336.x?cookieSet=1   May be the sunflower's heliotropism is a rudimentary feature from an alpine past? Ceinturion 12:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why do sunflowers "want" to follow the sun? 

message: It says that he cultivated them around 1000 B.C.... but this is impossible because Pizarro didn't even go to the Americas until the 16th century A.D.
:Although the text did not say Pizarro cultivated sunflowers, the sentence has been rephrased. Ceinturion 12:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pizarro? 

message: There are many species in the genus Helianthus all of them "sunflowers", they possibly deserve a mention as do the decorative, dwarf and giant varieties that can aparently grow upto 7.76m (25ft 5.5in) tall. 
Some mention could also be made of sunflower growing competitions or how to grow them. 84.51.146.100 06:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other types and species of sunflower 

message: I made a comment about this on my Talk page, and I will copy an excerpt here as my source:
Here's a line from the beginning of the Weed article (emphasis mine):  
Weeds may be unwanted because they are unsightly, or they limit the growth of other plants by blocking light or using up nutrients from the soil.  
I would also agree with the "unsightly" definition to an extent, but you cannot generalize it to "any plants that are unwanted, or haven't been planted by the grower."  What if, for example, an acorn is somehow brought onto the property (maybe by an animal)?  Is the oak tree that grows from it considered a weed?  --Procrastinatrix 18:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, in this very general sense, if  the oak sprouts in the middle of a person's prize dahlia patch, they may yank it out as a weed.  That's what a weed is, an undesired plant, not in its proper location according to some criterion.  KP Botany 19:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sunflower is not a weed 

message: Wikipedia articles aren't really supposed to be general image gallery pages; ideally, each image should have a specific role in illustrating some fact about sunflowers. AnonMoos 07:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Probably too many images

message: I don't understand this sentence... 
"Sunflowers can be processed into a peanut butter alternative, Sunbutter, especially in China, Russia, the United States, the Middle East and Europe."
It seems redundant. It lists pretty much the whole world. maybe it should be rephrased?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordmichael21 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunflower 

message: You guys should try to make more pictures of sunflower seeds such as the process of frying it. 
Tell me when it is posted.
Andygusgs (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Better you do it yourself Ceinturion (talk) 08:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andygusgs should............. 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: In fact, the origin of domestication has been fairly conclusively shown to have happened in the southeastern US. Basically, all domesticated sunflowers (whether from mexico or wherever) are more closely related to wild populations from the US than to wild populations in mexico. This has been shown using allozymes, nuclear, and chloroplast markers. There are only two archeological sites in mexico, plus some ehtnographic data to suggest otherwise, and these could have originated from an early (pre-columbian) introduction from the north. 
lots of evidence to back this up:
Burke, John, M., Shunxue Tang, Steven J. Knappb, and Loren H. Rieseberg. 2002. Genetic Analysis of Sunflower Domestication. Genetics, 161: 1257-1267
Abigail V. Harter, Keith A. Gardner1, Daniel Falush2, David L. Lentz3, Robert A. Bye4 & Loren H. Rieseberg. 2004. Origin of extant domesticated sunflowers in eastern North America. Nature, 430: 201-205
Rieseberg, Loren H. and Gerald J. Seiler. 1990. Molecular Evidence and the Origin and Development of the Domesticated Sunflower (Helianthus annum , Asteraceae). Economic Botany 44: 79-91.
Admittedly there is "controversy" in the field about this but the article should at least reflect both perspectives, since the evidence is definitely on the side of one domestication origin in the US.
24.84.193.187 (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innacurate domestication origin information 

message: This page needs to be moved to Helianthus annuus or Common sunflower.  Sunflower covers a large group of plants and the only vernacular name  limited to this species is "Common sunflower". Note this search for a quick overview. . Hardyplants (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this article should be re-titled. Janeky (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, it has now been five years since you proposed this change, and nothing has happened: no one has yet moved the page, and neither has anyone objected to the idea.  I am going to assume that Hardyplants knows what he/she is talking about (I am not a botanist, though neither am I completely ignorant of plant taxonomy/ naming) and will be bold and try right now to carry out this move myself.  This is a pretty frequently visited page, and I have never attempted a thing like this before.  But if it needs to be done, then it should be done-- somebody watch my back, here goes bold nothin'! KDS4444Talk 06:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

text: Aaaaaaaaand done!  Article moved successfully, now just trying to clean up the redirects!  Yay! KDS4444Talk 07:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Sunflowers take from 10-20 days to start gerrmination  to get them too start gerrmination you have to have them in a sunny spot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.133.164 (talk) 20:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  germination! 

message: Sunflowers may also be used to extract toxic ingredients from soil, such as lead, arsenic and uranium. They were used to remove uranium, cesium-137, and strontium-90 from soil after the Chernobyl disaster (see phytoremediation).
This doesn't explain why Sunflowers may be used for this purpose? Is it just that they are an abundant organic substance that is found in surroundings at these circumstance and therefore free access (that organic substances have a hygroscopic or "sponging" effect to the high end element or such?). In addition the Cough medicine article says that the sunflower is an expectorant, is this do to a molecule or alkaloid that grows within it or a combination of the elements that form it; or is this a common facet to grass and hay and most other plant life (which I know animals eat for various gastro-intestinal remedies)? 4.242.174.188 (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  There is nothing about permission except for the misuse of the word "may."  I have replaced "may also" with "can." — Jay L09 (talk) 15:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cultivation and uses" 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Helianthus+annuus%22+seeds+carnitine&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.215.115 (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The seeds and carnitine content..... 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Sunflower sky backdrop.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 31, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-01-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 06:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Sunflower sky backdrop.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The notion that mature sunflower heads track the sun appears to be widespread. I suspect many people come to the WP page to find out if this is true. I think it is relevant to note that this notion is not true. To say that mature sunflowers exhibit no diurnal movement is not strong enough a refutation of this myth, and the use of the word diurnal is unnecessarily obscure, in my opinion.````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaplot (talk • contribs) 09:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just reading the section and I think it is too strong now in saying it is not true. It says it's not true as an absolute and then goes on to clarify that it is not true for mature plants, but is very much true for immature plants. The plants do track the sun at a certain stage of their life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.69.182.234 (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you misread the section. It says "a common misconception is that flowering sunflower heads track the Sun". That specifically refers only to the mature plant. The presence of flowering sunflower heads means the sunflower plant is mature, they are the conspicuous yellow 'sunflowers'. In contrast, immature flower buds are inconspicuous,  closed and green. Few people notice the immature plant, so there are no common conceptions or misconceptions about the immature plant. Elevant (talk) 17:50, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heliotropism 

message: The following images were in a gallery removed from the page per WP:IG because they're a rather indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject. When the article is expanded, some may be moved back to the article inline with prose. Until then they're queued here. Rkitko (talk) 13:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image queue 

message: I've restored the page following an undiscussed move. If the page needs renaming, seek consensus here first. Vsmith (talk) 23:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move undone 

message: I am not sure the new section at the beginning has improved the article. It is an plethora of botany jargon (dicot, radicle, taproot, apical meristem, plumule, xylem, phloem, cortex, pith, calyx, corolla, and perianth). I would think it is not something the general reader of wikipedia would want to read, outside the scope of wikipedia. Ceinturion (talk) 18:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. A diagram would be very helpful.冷雾 (talk) 00:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Structure" section 

message: I think it would be better to remove the entire 'culture' section, which currently is just a bullet list of non-encyclopedic information (tourist information and company logos). Any objections? Ceinturion (talk) 09:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do it, baby! (if you haven't already...  Sorry for the drive-by talk page commentary).KDS4444Talk 11:03, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture 

message: This article is full of incorrectly used jargon and some bizarre usages, some of which are not even botanical. Either someone is messing with us, or the article was edited by someone with a poor grasp of botany. The entire structure section should probably be removed or completely rewritten, and the rest of the article rewritten as well.
This article used to be better. What happened?
Any thoughts?Michaplot (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: An anonymous user created the structure section on 4 december 2012 (diff), and he shuffled a few sections. I wouldn't mind if those edits were reverted. But I don't know much about botanical jargon. Ceinturion (talk) 20:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Michaplot, this is your opportunity to be WP:BOLD and switch the article back to a version you think was the best one!  Anonymous users are somewhat famous for doing what Ceinturion describes: executing messy revisions and taking no accountability for them by using an IP address.  The good news is that their work can quickly be undone if someone (you?) will take the time to look at the article's history log and figure out where the good stuff "left off".  Once you have established that, reverting to that version is pretty straightforward, I think (though I do not think I have ever done a revert myself that goes back more than one edit in an article's history...  but that means nothing).  Will you sally forth, good sir? KDS4444Talk 11:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in Need of Revision 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de La Blanca, Cardejón, España, 2012-09-01, DD 02.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on October 18, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-10-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:13, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de La Blanca, Cardejón, España, 2012-09-01, DD 02.JPG]] to appear as POTD 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Helianthus annuus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/lab/5833/cycas.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Helianthus annuus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090907063800/http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html to http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/lab/5833/cycas.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130523191033/http://www.flowers-org.com/helianthus-sunflower.html to http://www.flowers-org.com/helianthus-sunflower.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Helianthus annuus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090527035852/http://www.learn2grow.com/plantdatabase/plants/PlantDetails.aspx?PlantID=9e95edbe-8f23-4880-a664-5e6cdac17e68 to http://www.learn2grow.com/plantdatabase/plants/PlantDetails.aspx?PlantID=9e95edbe-8f23-4880-a664-5e6cdac17e68
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Helianthus annuus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090916234127/http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat2.html to http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat2.html
*Added  tag to https://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110624/wl_asia_afp/japandisasteraccidentnuclearsunflowers
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I plan on adding a sentence to the heliotropism section to include a detail I thought would help others understand how helioptropism works. This is my first time editing a wiki article so I am still not sure what the proper etiquette is for informing others that I am adding onto an article. If it is necessary, the sentence I am going to add is: They are able to regulate their circadian rhythm in response to the blue-light emitted by a light source. Leetif03 (talk) 22:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding an informative sentence 

message: I am curious why so little information is included about all the different ways it is used as a food source.  The only thing mentioned is use of seeds but nothing about the other parts of the plant.  One can find dozens of videos and many articles on the internet about the use of Sunflower seedlings as microgreens as just one example.  There are old wife's tales about the leaves being poisonous but I've been eating them in salad since I was a kid.  If they are toxic they sure do take a long time to make you sick as I'm in my sixties.  Would it not be appropriate to add a section expounding upon the use of various parts of the plant for food.  As far as I know the entire plant is edible.  Roots can be cut up and eaten raw as a slaw or boiled to make a tea.  The stalk can be cooked in a soup or steamed or pealed and eaten raw and taste a little like celery.  The leaves, flower petals, bud all can be eaten raw or cooked.  The plant is loaded with nutrients.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.142.155.80 (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Used as a food source? 

message: I added in a sentence explaining why the Helianthus annuus is harmful to the crops which were listed previously.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finfinbear (talk • contribs) 21:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to the Cultivation Section 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Common sunflower. Seems to be an acceptable compromise. A move discussion from Helianthus to Sunflower may also be a good idea going forward. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 01:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Helianthus annuus →  – Sunflowers are exceedingly too common & well known to have their article be placed under the Latin name rather than the common name. The rationale for moving it here was a supposed "consensus" that all articles on plants must be under the Latin names; this is apparently a consensus of purely botany-interested editors, and not of the community at large, and for relatively obscure plants, that practice seems fine. Sunflower is not one of such plants. For analogy, we have the articles apple, plum, rose, pineapple, and tulip, not Malus domestica, Prunus domestica, Rosa spp., Ananas comosa,  and Tulipa. Note: for whatever reason, "sunflower" currently redirects to the article on the genus; I think that page should be left where it is, but sunflower should be the name of this article; we can put a hatnote at the top that says something like "For the genus, which contains some species that are also sometimes called sunflowers, see..." 2600:1702:4960:1DE0:50F6:C1D6:31E7:5B10 (talk) 03:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

text: There are a number of different plants called "Sunflower".  Common Sunflower would be the name for Helianthus annuus Hardyplants (talk) 03:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sunflower" by itself preferable to "common sunflower" per decision at "Chimpanzee" as compared with "Common chimpanzee". Randy Kryn (talk) 10:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  not sure this is comparable, as the other member of Pan also has a well known common name, the bonobo. For sunflowers there are many member of the genus Helianthus with common names '<something> sunflower'. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Would Sunflower work better as the title of Helianthus? Randy Kryn (talk) 01:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so, yes. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 March 2022 

message: There is a widespread myth about sunflowers related to Greek mythology.  One version says 
 Clytie was a water nymph, and deeply in love with the sun god Helios. Sadly, he left her for another goddess, and it's said that Clytie watched Helios crossing the sky in his golden chariot for days, without any food or water.  Eventually, she was transformed into a sunflower, and it’s said this is why sunflowers always face the sun. 
However, since the sunflower is assumed to have come to Europe only in the 16th century, there is something that doesn't make sense here.  Could somebody do some research on this? Maybe sunflower is confused with turnsole?
Joreberg (talk) 08:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek mythology? 

message: Hey @Larizdibartolo, the edit you did today has a style problem. What you wrote is worded like advice and Wikipedia's style guidelines say not to do that. See WP:NOTGUIDE. Also what you added about disposal does not have a reference. Do you have one? 🌿MtBotany (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style problem 

message: — Assignment last updated by Warmedforbs (talk) 01:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Applied Plant Ecology Winter 2024