Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Louisville/Archive 2

message: Please, everyone, if you have a little time, please squeeze in some article assessments.  We still have over 400 left to do.  (and almost 800 don't have importance set)
Check out the list of unassessed articles and have at it.
If anyone has any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's come together and finish article assessments 

message: My apologies about removing the Louisville-related tag from the Ivy Tech article without discussing it here first. I was not aware that it was a matter of decorum to do so. However, my reasoning for the removal of the tag was that while the Ivy Tech campus is in the Louisville area, it's not actually in Louisville itself. Since the campus isn't actually in the Louisville city limits, I felt that it shouldn't be considered as apart of it. A lot of people from Louisville may drive to the campus and take courses there, but the campus' legal address is still in Sellersburg, Indiana. The same applies to the Indiana University Southeast campus - while it's in the Louisville metropolitan area, it's still technically in New Albany, Indiana. Ibm2431 08:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WikiProject Louisville covers the entire Louisville Metropolitan Statistical Area, of which Sellersburg is a part.  Anything inside it is subject to coverage by the project.  Consider that there's no inherent damage to the article if this project covers it; on the contrary, more project coverage will ultimately mean more attention to the article.  Also, this is an encyclopedia, so inclusion is based on the fact that IUS is in the metropolitan area, not whether IUS thinks it should be included.  There are probably many entities in the metropolitan area that balk at the idea they are in the Louisville metro area, but the facts are in opposition to them. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning an Ivy Tech campus 

message: I've noticed that Charlestown State Park has been included in Louisville-related articles.  Someone recently changed a category on this article from "Louisville parks" to "Parks in Louisville".  Both of these are misleading, however, as Charlestown State Park is not even bordering Louisville; it's merely in the greater metropolitan area.  Is there a category, for things in the Louisville are, as opposed to incorrectly labeling it as something IN Louisville?
Thanks for your time,Married to a Charlestown Girl,CobaltBlueTony 22:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't currently have a category for that.  However, if we were to do that, we would have to do that across the board, and it would make categorization a lot more complicated with respect to Louisville vs. Louisville metro area things.  Perhaps we should just put a description in "Parks in Louisville" and other similar categories that the category applies to things in the entire metro area. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't one just edit the project template to say that the project covers things that are in the Louisville metropolitan area as well? I think it'd be the easiest solution. Have the project tag say something to the effect of "This article is within the scope of WikiProject:Louisville, which concerns subjects related to or in Louisville or its metropolitan area". Obviously, the wording could use a bit of work, but I think that it would be the simplest, most effective solution to clear up the confusion. Ibm2431 01:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, now the template says "metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky".  The template is already rather thick, so I'd rather not add that many extra words. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 03:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of non-Louisville Proper articles under Louisville 

message: Who's with me to push this very good article of a great man to GA?  It's already a strong B. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Muhammad Ali]] -- let's go to GA! 

message: Check out the newly refurbished Requested Articles department.  Hopefully, the page will now appear a lot less cluttered and easier to edit. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Articles department redesigned for clarity 

message: Please vote for Muhammad Ali at Wikipedia:U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTW. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muhammad Ali nominated for U.S. Collaboration of the Week 

message: I've come to the conclusion recently, after having an image description vandalized, and noticing the sheer volume of Louisville related images that need to be tracked somehow, that we need to add all Louisville-related images (as class=NA) to the project.  But to save us the work of doing it manually, I'm going to enlist a bot that has helped us before: WatchlistBot. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Louisville images to the project 

message: Hey all, I'm going on a "partial wikibreak" for the forseeable future so I can put more time into other projects.  That means I will just do two check-in's a day to review and respond to changes in my watchlist and talk page. I have to be honest and say I won't be able to participate in any major efforts or discussions during this time.
By the way, WikiProject Louisville doesn't have that many initial assessments left to do.  Somebody please be a sport and finish it up for the team.  I frankly got burned out on it a few days ago.  It's one of those boring drudgery tasks, but yet it needs to get done. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going on partial wikibreak 

message: Apparently, a free newspaper called "The Highlander" (mailed to every house in the Highlands) is printing our articles (with attribution). This is of course part of what our copyrights allow for, but at any rate, they are printing one of the neighborhood summaries every month. Irish Hill will be next, and they are going in the order listed in The Highlands (Louisville). Just thought people would like to know, make some quick edits to tidy them up before publication. --W.marsh 00:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds cool.  Maybe that will bring new members to the project, or at least more people editing Louisville articles. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 06:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  publication 

message: Regarding Inclusion Advice on archive page:
Inclusion advice
I can't decide whether we should mention the recent murder in Cherokee Triangle in our article on the neighborhood. I have a hard time judging these things. Any thoughts? I'm mentioning it here because discussion on the talk page there would probably be minimal or nonexistant. CJ article here --W.marsh 21:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  case closure 

message: Just wanted to let everyone know I was interviewed by The Courier-Journal today regarding the goings-on with user Essjay from the Louisville area.  I haven't been following this story very closely, but I tried to defend the Wikipedia by saying that any possible damage by Essjay using false credentials to influence content is easily mitigated by anybody being able to change any content at any time.  I also said basically that any negative public image of the Wikipedia because of Essjay's actions would be understandable for those who don't understand the Wikipedia, but that it would also be undeserved.  And I said that pretending to be something one is not is not limited to the Internet or in particular, the Wikipedia, and thus the onus should be on Essjay regarding his actions.  I realize that this is in conflict with Essjay's many defenders here, but that is my position.  Using false authority to get ahead is just plain wrong. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courier-Journal phone interview re: Essjay 

message: I've been thinking about the current importance scale and the criteria for each level. I'm not completely satisfied with them. Or rather, I'm not completely satisfied with the wording (it's not elegant, in my opinion). So, as an alternative:
Top-importance: Those articles which contain essential knowledge about Louisville that anyone, visitor or resident, should know. Examples include the main Louisville article, the Kentucky Derby, the Slugger Museum, Muhammad Ali, etc.
High-importance: Those articles which are about common-knowledge subjects pertaining to Louisville. A resident is almost guaranteed to know about it, and most visitors will at least be aware of the subject. For example, Jerry Abramson, the Falls of the Ohio, the Louisville skate park, etc.
Mid-importance: Articles about subjects which are fairly well-known in the community, but may be obscure trivia otherwise. For example, the Jefferson County Public Schools, Jeffersontown, some of the major high schools (though a couple, such as Male and Manual, probably go into the high-importance category), colleges (as opposed to universities), etc. Major cities other than Louisville probably go here, such as Clarksville, New Albany, and Shepherdsville.
Low-importance: Articles about subjects unfamiliar to even the residents. Examples would probably include all the neighborhoods unless there were something exceptional. Nearly all K-12 schools should go here unless there were something that merited the higher classification. Biographies of people whose only connection to the city is being born or raised here should go here (e.g., all the sports people)
One thing that I don't know what to do with - those articles which are probably of higher importance to the tourists than the visitors. For example, I was evaluating the National Quartet Competition (or something like that), and I had a dilemma because in southern gospel music, the NQC is fairly well-known, but around here, I was thinking, what? Or the Sons of the American Revolution. I didn't know that was based here. Perhaps we need a class for such articles?
--Carl (talk|contribs) 02:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for revised importance scale 

message: Thanks to all for the comments and suggestions to our Wikipedia page. I'm new so give me some time to get this right. Any suggestions are welcomed. Samstudebaker 19:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kentuckiana Blues Society]] 

message: I just added a project alert to notify everyone that we still have almost 300 articles that need to be assigned importance.  I did a few to get it started.  Importance means how important the article is to the subject of Louisville in the Wikipedia, or at least, that's my take on it.  Cheers! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assigning importance to articles 

message: Wow!  Louisville, Kentucky is now in 25 languages as of today!  Great news for our beloved hometown! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milestone for main Louisville article 

message: It has seemed that for much of this year, communication and coordination in WikiProject Louisville has been lacking, and it's not really surprising given that this has always been an open, loosely coordinated project.  I tend to believe that communication between project members is a major key to improved coordination, but others may have other ideas.  At any rate, I am starting a brainstorming list for everyone to insert their ideas about how we can improve communication and coordination in the project. Thanks in advance for your suggestions! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brainstorm: Improving communication and coordination 

message: *Improve outreach by starting a project newsletter that would be delivered monthly to members' talk pages.  Members, of course, will be able to opt out of receiving them.  This is technically easy to implement, as many other projects are already doing it. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Brainstorming ideas

message: I think outreach would be a good idea... trying to get more regular Louisville editors. Obviously lots of people are interested in Louisville history and current events, yet most new stuff about Louisville seems to get added by the same 3-5 people. It just seems like the project can only really be so good with the small number of active people. I think maybe a newsletter would help here, just to kind of make sure everyone knows what our monthly focus is, what we're collaborating on, and what Louisville articles might be in the news. For example the failed Old Louisville FAC... as an individual I couldn't deal with the problems people brought up, but as a collaborating project we might have been able to do it.
But still, even great coordination won't overcome the fact that there are just about 5 of us, so I think our effort should be on figuring out ways to get new Louisville editors. I'm not really sure how to go about that, I've seen to it that there's a plug in each issue of "the Highlander", a monthly newspaper mailed to every house in the Highlands, encouraging people to log on and edit Louisville articles... but no one's really come forward to do that yet. Maybe we need to reach out to people who write about Louisville, like U of L, the Courier-Journal, LEO... just get the word out that if people are interested in preserving Louisville's history they should edit some Wikipedia articles. But then there's the problem of attracting POV pushers more than people who are just interested in generating neutral, academic-like articles... the latter is a summary of the current crop of regulars, and that's a good thing.
But my point is that we need to get more regular editors, somehow or other. All of the other things Stevie mentions are important, and we should look into them, but my main concern is with getting a critical mass of active editors. --W.marsh 17:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Bedford and I have been talking about the need for List of Registered Historic Places in Jefferson County, Kentucky to be broken down by Louisville neighborhood, and then accordingly mentioned in their respective neighborhood articles.  This may then provide an impetus for those who live in or care about specific neighborhoods to then create and/or fill out articles for these places.  Any interest or suggestions for proceeding? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concentrated effort: Organizing historic places by Louisville neighborhood 

message: Kentucky DMV Introduces Game Of Chicken To Driver's Test – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the news 

message: In developing the article on Kentucky in the American Civil War, I ran across a topic suitable for WPLou. Camp Jo Holt was a Union recruiting camp in Indiana, just opposite Louisville, from which Union forces operated during Kentucky's neutrality. Because it was just outside Kentucky, it didn't violate the Commonwealth's neutrality, but was strategically positioned for the day when the neutrality was broken. If no one wants to take this one on, I'll probably stub it in at some point, but I know there are a few people interested in the Civil War in this project who could probably do it better justice than I. Acdixon 13:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it may be spelled as Camp Joe Holt, as that looks more familiar to me and produces more entries in a Google search.  But, yeah, that's a great topic to add to our requested list. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. I think The Civil War in Kentucky by Lowell H. Harrison omits the "e". Sounds like a redirect will be necessary for one or the other, and both spellings should probably be noted in the article. Thanks for adding it to the list. Acdixon 14:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome.  I also just looked in the book "Kentucky's Civil War 1861-1865", in which Harrison is a contributor, and it's spelled "Joe".  But alas, many things in the Civil War period seemed to have alternative spellings, like "Sue Munday" and "Sue Mundy". Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I presently have that book checked out as well. I think you're right as to the more appropriate spelling, as the camp seems to be named for Joseph Holt. "Joe" is generally the masculine spelling, while "Jo" generally connotes the feminine. Acdixon 14:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I created a redirect for Jo to Joe.--Bedford 05:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested article: [[Camp Jo Holt]] 

message: I just added "needs-image=yes" as a parameter to , which can be used in place of .  This will save vertical space on the talk page, and it will add the article to the same category. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New parameter to project template 

message: I just wanted to report that, again, I've been interviewed by a Courier-Journal writer.  The last time was about the Essjay controversy, but this time it was about a much tamer subject -- How Louisville-area middle-schoolers can use the Wikipedia. :)   I talked about WikiProject Louisville, and what we try to accomplish.  I talked about how we deal with vandalism.  I talked about article history for the sake of rollbacks.  I talked about the things about Louisville that young people can learn from reading our articles.  I talked about how youngsters can contribute, although I hopefully stressed that it's better for the young ones to read our content rather than try to write it, and if they did write anything, it's best that they know about the subject they are working on.  At least, I hope I conveyed all those things accurately. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another phone interview with the C-J 

message: Check out this new advertisement in Craigslist for WikiProject Louisville.  Based on earlier discussions on getting the word out, I took the initiative and wrote it up.  Note: I'll be happy to entertain any suggestions for improving.  Alas, it isn't wiki, but it's easy for me to go in and edit it.  Cheers! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now advertising in Craigslist 

message: I've been thinking lately that it may be useful to start looking into having coordinated taskforces for our project.  One big idea I had for a taskforce would be for U of L, as we have lots of articles related to U of L, and this could be a great way to enhance student involvement in WikiProject Louisville.  Another taskforce idea would be to cover historical events and properties, as Louisville's history is so rich that a taskforce makes sense.  I'm sure there are other areas worthy of taskforces as well.  Any thoughts? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about that idea about a week or two ago. I was thinking more in terms of "coordinators" among the more active members who took a more-or-less vested interest in a certain category of articles, e.g., my interest in the public school system articles. These coordinators would make efforts to improve the articles in their areas (such as a "University of Louisille Coordinator" promoting the UL articles or my taking pictures of various buildings in the school system as I drive by them). --Carl (talk|contribs) 04:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeap, I was thinking that since the active members in the project were still few, that whoever wants to lead a taskforce should just go for it, and we'll start keeping track of them.  Of course they should be of reasonable size.  JCPS is certainly potentially large, and it's obvious a big part of that will be creating new school articles, as well as filling out many existing school articles.  I might even recommend expanding this taskforce to cover all primary and secondary schools, public or private, in the metropolitan area.  Of course, that's up to you or whoever the coordinator will be. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 02:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taskforces: A way to get more people involved? 

message: Just wanted everyone to know that the  project banner now discovers todo lists automatically, so there's no longer a need to have our own version of the todo list template.  Now just use the standard  instead of . Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo list discovery added to WPLou banner 

message: Today I created the template  to organize neighborhood and city articles in Jefferson County, possibly even large places like Cave Hill Cemetery and so on. I don't think any other cities do this, but it seems like something that will work with Louisville. Before I add this to all the places in Jefferson County, I'd like to get some feedback. --W.marsh 19:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it.  Perhaps it could include possibility of Northwest, Northeast, Southwest and Southeast places.  Also perhaps say "Louisville Metro" in the caption rather than "Jefferson County, Kentucky". Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going for just the simple ordinal directions... it might be information overload to give 8 places instead of just 4. The problem with "Louisville metro" though is I was going to include suburban cities too, like Glenview and so on... I guess those are technically Louisville Metro though. --W.marsh 19:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the other directions could be optional, as boundaries are not always so simple.  Either that, or allow link stacking on the east/west sides and side-by-side links on the north/south sides.  I don't imagine there would be a frequently need for these, but it may help clarify in some situations. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 19:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll look into that. I'm not exactly sure how to do optional parameters now though, I'll have to figure out somehow. --W.marsh 19:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a matter of conditional logic to test if the parameter was provided. Some examples of this can be found in . Look at how #if works. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been trying but I'm not very good at this sort of thing. --W.marsh 01:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess if it turns out there's a significant need for extra directions, I'll be happy to code it up.  Just let me know if the need arises. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 02:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it would really help if all the directions were optional, and just the ones that a user wanted showed up in an individual application of the template. That's the reason I haven't added this to more places yet, you're right that northeast, southwest, etc. would be best in some situations. But I'm pretty baffled by the coding so if you could do it, it would probably speed the whole thing up by a few weeks. --W.marsh 03:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Let me know if there are any additional issues. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 03:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  navbox template 

message: I recently learned of an excellent way to get information on any NRHP in Kentucky. You can just call the Kentucky Heritage Council at (502) 564-7005 and ask for Marty Perry. He will e-mail you a PDF on any property you want, which contains 10+ pages of information on the property's history and historical importance, as well as it's architectural importance. They include plenty of footnotes, meaning the information in the PDF will be totally acceptable for Wikipedia as it's from published sources (the PDF itself probably counts as a published source anyway, due to the NHRP process, they're archived in various libraries on Microfilm). Most properties have 5+ pictures as well, which I believe to be in the public domain as it's through the National Park Service, a federal level agency, but don't quote me on that.
Just to avoid getting Wikipedia a bad rap with them, I remind you that this is a really cool service they don't have to provide (they could make you go to the library and print off microfilm), so please be nice to Mr. Perry. --W.marsh 22:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Einbierbitte just had this tidbit in his talk yesterday: "For others that may be curious, the National Park Service has a Weekly Update http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/nrlist.htm which it publishes every Friday with new listings, removals, additional information, DOEs, NHL designations, etc."  Sounds very useful for those us diehard WPLou editors.  :) Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRHP resource 

message: I'm thinking we might want to have an "Articles for Exclusion" process in our project.  Any subject/article significantly related to Louisville nearly automatically gets included in this project, as what happens with most other projects.  However, I'm thinking there will be some articles that 1) are of low importance to Louisville, and 2) have plenty of other project coverage and/or watchful eyes without our project's presence.  Tom Cruise seems to be a good example of this, and there may be a good number of other ones as well.  Perhaps we should have a process by which we decide which articles we won't cover.  Does this sound like a good idea? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles for Exclusion process 

message: Apparently, the Louisville flag was removed due to copyright issues.  Does anyone have any ideas on how we can bring a legal flag image in here? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 17:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag taken away

message: Well, I'm off to a rousing start with my FA nom of Confederate government of Kentucky – 2 oppose votes. One reviewer commented that "The lead needs to be reworked and the tone of the prose is decidedly unencyclopedic." If some of the same good-hearted souls that helped save my nom of William Goebel could take a look at this article and see what can be done, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Acdixon 12:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be fruitful to ask members in the American Civil War task force of the Military History WikiProject to help out. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion. I've done just that. I'd still love feedback from any interested members of this WikiProject. Acdixon 16:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm interested, but I don't have the time to invest. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed 

message: I really know nothing of Wikipedia's technical side, so I'm hoping someone can answer this question. Is there any way to generate a list of articles with pending maintenence tags, within a given project? I think that one of the great things we can do as a project is keep our articles in decent shape, and being able to zoom in and make sure no articles had "citation needed" or other tags, which are relatively easy to address. A monthly report on 'articles with maintenence' tags would be really useful. I just have no idea if it's practical to create such a thing or not... if not, I will stick to just fixing them when I notice them. --W.marsh 17:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A bot could probably handle this.  The complicating factors are that article talk pages get placed into multiple assessment categories corresponding to the project, while articles get placed into various categories for all the maintenance tags.  The result would have to be an intersection between what's included in these two sets of categories. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenence question 

message: Just FYI, the FA nomination of Confederate government of Kentucky has been restarted. Reviews and comments are appreciated. Acdixon 14:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restarted nomination 

message: If one were to monitor the various deletion forums and find articles nominated for deletion which have been tagged on the talk page with this WikiProject's banner, where would you like to see those notifications appear?
* on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Kentucky
* on a WikiProject sub-page, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville/Deletions
* on this talk page here, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Louisville
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion notifications 

message: * Ballardsville, Louisville 13 August --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:PROD]] nominations

message: Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Louisville vs. West Virginia football game - Johntex\talk 16:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion discussion

message: Question for WikiProject Louisville.  I represent Spalding University and was curious if I could edit that WikiProject Louisville Page. The SU page is a great start, but SU really has more to offer than the page really communicates. I'm a member now, but I wanted to make sure I followed the rules of WikiProject. Thanks Pelican07 13:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: The IWU article was recently vandalized by user: 199.8.26.10. He deleted the entire school "History" section and keeps vandalizing it. I tried to restore it, but I was not able to do so. Could you please investigate and restore what was vandalized? I notified editor WikiProject_Indiana, but he has not responded or taken action.  Please help ASAP.
Thanks,
-manutdglory  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manutdglory (talk • contribs) 05:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indiana Wesleyan University 

message: The Beck's Mill article is currently on hold for a Good article nominee.  Any help would be appreciated.--Bedford (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice article, though lacking adequate sourcing per the GA review.  I posted a suggestion for a good definitive source for the article (the official NRHP documents), in its talk page. doncram (talk) 17:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If I knew where to find that, I would use it.  The bridge next to it has joined the NRHP, and that helped some.--Bedford 20:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Beck's Mill]] GA Nom

message: I just added an alert calling on my fellow editors to help with building up the currently "stubby" Andrew Horne article.  He is now running for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate.  Thanks! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please help building up the [[Andrew Horne]] article 

message: Some concerns were brought to mention by TableManners about the Category in the including of museums in Indiana which area in the Louisville metropolitan area. I think they should be included and not have a separate category. Share your thoughts at Category talk:Museums in Louisville. Jahnx (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category: Museums in Louisville