Talk:National Premier Leagues Victoria

message: Any particular reason why winners only since 1946 are listed, as well as only including participating clubs only from 1978 onwards?
:I'm going to be taking back the participating clubs as far back as 1946, maybe one year at a time, maybe not, if anyone sees any mistakes, of course please clean them up, thank you very much! Blackmissionary 23:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: At $200k salary cap most players do something else to earn a living so should not have articles unless they are well referenced?Garrie 05:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the players were from the [[National Soccer League}], so that's why they may have pages. Others have had A-League stints. But apart from them, everyone else in my opinion is non-notable. Blackmissionary 11:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi or fully professional? 

message: :Image:VicFootyShow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:VicFootyShow.jpg

message: I have posted a query on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions about the Foxtel Cup image that User:Andrew.andii uploaded and added to the Victorian Premier League pages.
Over and above the issue of copyright of the image (and integral to using it in the first place) is whether the VPL is still called the Foxtel Cup.
As posted on the copyright page, the only official source for 2009 is a website http://www.footballfedvic.com.au/foxtelcup.php
However this appears to be a front page, and all other links from it lead to the original Football Federation Victoria site
And links to foxtel as a sponsor are now dead - http://www.footballfedvic.com.au/corporate/sponsors/
To make sure of this, and also to better inform the History of the VPL section on the wiki page, I need some press release or news document discussing the status of the sponsorship and naming deal.
Am considering contacting FFV to find out but if anybody has a source it would be great if you could provide it on the page
Australian Matt (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming of the League

message: An image used in this article, File:VPL map.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:VPL map.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: ...is a really silly idea. It needs some sort of clarification as to what is meant by "Melbourne". There is a "City of Melbourne", but obviously the 98 premierships have been mostly won by teams outside that municipality, so what does it prove? And Morwell isn't a city. It's part of the City of Latrobe. And the section is unsourced. Unacceptable and pointless really. HiLo48 (talk) 07:53, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: totally agree, and deleted now.  Matilda Maniac (talk) 07:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victorian Premier League Champions Per City... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Premier Leagues Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224171748/http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/news-display/national-premier-leagues-confirmed-for-victoria-in-2014/80057 to http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/news-display/national-premier-leagues-confirmed-for-victoria-in-2014/80057
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123221844/http://footballfedvic.com.au/competitions/fixtures/ to http://www.footballfedvic.com.au/competitions/fixtures/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Are the Champions and Premiers' lists the wrong way around? This is my source: http://www.socceraust.co.uk/VIC/Champions/npl.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.252.68 (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Champions and premiers' liss the wrong way around?