Talk:History of the Danish navy

message: Rather than reverting your decision to remove the category:hisotry of norway designation, I'll sak here first. What is your logic? Tusen takk - Williamborg 02:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it is history. And i my view important history. But since it is also in Category:Royal Danish-Norwegian Navy which is in Category:Denmark-Norway which is in Category:History of Norway I don't see why it should be listed in both categories. Inge 13:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is no longer history? 

message: How many percent of different regions/nationalities must be documented some where, or just believed by a trusted historian. Since there is no source provided, i revert Berig's edit. --Dynamiske (talk) 16:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously you're working in a foreign language, but do try to be more clear as to what you're talking about. — LlywelynII 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  my last revert. 

message: Two massive sources  not just for this article but also for all the affiliate ship articles  are the Orlogsmuseet's ship-by-ship history pages and this compendium of Danish ships from prehistory to the 1690s. Of course, both of them are in , but what would you expect? — LlywelynII 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion

message: The latest (undiscussed) move from Dano-Norwegian navy was a slighty improvement in my view, but I think we should have a discussion on what to actually call the article. There seems to be somewhat of an undue focus on the loss of Norway. I don't see that it actually became a new organization, just like the Swedish Navy didn't suddenly change because by losing Finland (or gaining Norway).
So why use complicated and speculative backronyms? Why not settle for something intuitive like history of the Danish navy?
Peter Isotalo 19:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the Danish navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100723032109/http://www.navalhistory.dk/english/history/NavyBefore1801.htm to http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/History/NavyBefore1801.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hallo everybody!
Rather than a long list of ships names in this article, why not just give links to those ships which have Wiki-articles (i.e. blue links).
There are two superb external sources which I use a lot, and which are on my User page but which I repeat here.  Both originate from the website of the Royal Danish Naval Museum
*The Danish Navy and then >DATABASE>SIMPEL>Danske Navne>and choose your ship, or simply this link. This site also gives search ability by year, builder, type of ship by going >DATABASE>ADVANCEREDE and completing the drop-down menus. (Works only when language is set to Danish)
For record cards of individual ships (where they exist) or just the names listed alphabetically
* skibregister (den sorte registrand) - There is also access to all the coded sources and the usual caveats!
Of course, each complete ship's wiki-article is probably listed in the :Category:Ships of the Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy
Would this make this Danish Navy article easier to follow?? Comments??
Viking1808 (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After some thought, I have transferred the above as two notes at the beginning of the Ships section in the article. Viking1808 (talk) 20:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More lists of Danish ships