lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flight to Varennes

message: "The king's eldest brother, the Count of Provence…" was recently and anonymously changed to "The king's youngest brother, the Count of Provence…" Given anonymity, lack of citation, and lack of edit summary, I suspect random vandalism, but I'm not sure. -- Jmabel | Talk July 9, 2005 05:47 (UTC)
* Judging by Louis XVIII of France, this was, indeed, random vandalism. Reverting. -- Jmabel | Talk July 9, 2005 05:48 (UTC)
My guess is, this was one of those cases where a good-faith blunder comes across as vandalism - but was only carelessness / muddled thinking (combined with impulsive, anonymous editing!)
I reckon the contributor (saying “youngest”) meant “younger” - was confused by the thought tht Louis XVI, as king, (1) inherited normally, as eldest son, and so (2) couldn’t have any elder brothers.  Well, right, yeah: but he could have brothers; and one of them might be the eldest (fairly much sure to be, really, if there are more than one); and thatz what we meant.
What we meant was clear (to us): but clearly we lost our reader.  Not a practical problem now.  The relevant text seems to have gone from the article.  But an interesting little case study!
- SquisherDa (talk) 09:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Count of Provence

message: The lede does not summarise the main article, and is about three times too long in proportion.
Some items could be transferred, but I think it’s the main article that needs lengthening by a good deal. The main article begins: ‘Louis XVI's indecisive response was one of the causes of the forcible transfer of the royal family…’ Response to what? Obviously this was meant to follow an important section of copy that has since been deleted. Other editors have commented on the overall length of the article, compared to the French-language version. Time for an expert review, I suggest. Valetude (talk) 14:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede
Talk:Mia Doi Todd

message: Dusted Magazine as "one of those artists that seem to function not just as creators in their own rite, but as connecting links between other musicians."
The phrase is "in their own right". Either dusted magazine got it wrong (in which case wikipedia should add "sic" in square brackets. Or it is misquoted and should be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paedant (talk • contribs) 16:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dusted Magazine Quote - does anyone have a copy? 

message: Are those album titles really lowercase, or are they just printed as lowercase due to artistic typographical decisions made by a graphic designer? Unless you have evidence to the contrary (a press release or other info from the label or artist), you should assume it's gratuitous sleeve/case art when the artist name and credits are also in lowercase on those albums. In such situations, the corresponding article titles on Wikipedia should use caps. — mjb 9 July 2005 06:01 (UTC)
*Her biography; I don't know, I don't have those albums. - McCart42 (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowercase album titles 
Talk:Jo Angel

message: "He is one of only two bowlers who have taken 400 or more wickets for Western Australia (the other is the legendary Clarrie Grimmett)."
Grimmett didn't (as far as I know) play for WA.  NSW, VIC & SA only
Ian ≡ talk 9 July 2005 06:15 (UTC)
How could he have bowled 162 overs of ODI cricket if he's only played 3 ODIs?
:Fixed. Should have been balls. Tintin (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A series of IP addresses have edited the page and others recently to add an unnecessary overlink for Australia. Per WP:OLINK - there is no need to link to large geographical entities such as Australia in this context - and the obvious tautology is, well, a tautology - where else, exactly, do you propose locating Western Australia rather than in Australia? In an article such as this we simply don't need the addition of the country name to be clear where he was born - in an article about the state, yes, sure, we need it. Obviously.
These are dynamic IP addresses almost certainly from the same editor who has used other, similarly dynamic IP addresses in the past to edit pages such as Nathan Coulter-Nile and similar articles. That article has had to be protected as a result. These are clearly disruptive edits which have now gone past WP:3RR. I'd really rather not have to go to RPP, but will do so if necessary. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing
Talk:Gaborone

message: I am a bangladeshi man,i was staying in Botswana about 12 years ago now i want a police clearance so how i will collect it as soon as possible, i have Botswana residence permit which is already date over,tell me what i m going to do.plz help me about @ 103.107.132.182 (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About police clearance
Talk:Cranky Kong

message: It's never been truly proven that Cranky Kong is Donkey Kong Sr. While Rare has stated this, it has never been substantiated by Miyamoto or anyone else at Nintendo. -- A Link to the Past 22:12, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
:And that line is retconned, if it was ever Nintendo's word in the first place. Donkey Kong is, at this very moment, referred to as Mario's oldest villain, and so any comment from Rare OR Nintendo is either unofficial or retconned. -- A Link to the Past 21:06, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
:I have found evidence to the contrary. This video is from some sort of promo for the game back during the production of Donkey Kong Country. I believe that this, coupled with the other facts, is enough to warrant that Cranky Kong is, indeed, the original antagonist. The statement is at approximately 3:20: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7511271855512729880  Flame0001 01:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be that as it may, the current state of the article is too biased, mentioning the possibility of him being the original DOnkey Kong in only one sentence. I move we rectify this. 66.167.140.112 02:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Issues 

message: I have created a temporary argument page at Cranky Kong/temp. Feel free to post valid, documented arguments. I did not put anything about the Seal of Approval and such, because I personally don't know anything about Nintendo policy. I hope this will help sort things out... Hopefully. Schrei 04:36, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary page 

message: This article has been protected for an insanely long period.  I've unprotected it.  Be nice. --Tony SidawayTalk 17:01, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotected

message: I noticed what was mentioned in Mario Superstar Baseball was brought back up again, but has a  next to it.  In the game, the information in question can be found in Donkey Kong's MVP profile.  Could someone take care of it?  I'm not sure how to cite it correctly myself-
SS Yoshi
It has been disputed whether or not Cranky Kong is truly the original Donkey Kong, from the Donkey Kong game, and if he is DK's father or grandfather. While Rareware has confirmed that Cranky was the gorilla in Donkey Kong and is the "current" Donkey Kong's father, it was not made clear for some time, and now more confusion has arisen due to Retro Studios referring to him as Donkey Kong's grandfather.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightend (talk • contribs) 05:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "His ancestor, the original Donkey Kong, wore no necktie."
Talk:List of high schools in Los Angeles County, California

message: The LAUSD section of this article should probably be replace with a note to see the LAUSD article so that there is only one place listing all of the LAUSD schools. The same thing should also be done for any other school districts that already have a complete list of high schools (e.g. Long Beach Unified School District). BlankVerse 00:08, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense. -Willmcw 01:30, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Maintaining two lists of schools
Talk:Richard Valentine Pitchford

message: i remember reading a long time ago that he started wearing gloves while practicing sleight of hand because it was so cold in the trenches.  If this can be corroborated, this should be included, since it is an interesting nugget explaining partly his unique style.  --C S (Talk) 05:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  gloves 

message: The content on this page appears to have been taken verbatim from the cited official home page (or vice versa). BenKimball 15:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  verbatim? 

message: Why is this article not titled Cardini?  Clearly (it seems to me) that is the name by which he is predominantly known.  Unless I'm convinced otherwise by arguments here, I will move the article to that title (if I don't forget...).  Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Brian Blackwell

message: This page has clearly been vandalized. Can someone please revert or edit to something more respectable?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.112.144.46 (talk) 05:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: :I still don't see this guy's notability. He's a psycho and killed his parents. That's it. And he got his face in the papers. So what? JFW | T@lk 19:12, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't arguing with Candice at this point; I wasn't aware she was the principal author, and gave a normal response below. I was only pointing out that I wasn't sure of the subject's notability. JFW | T@lk 16:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

text: You're allowed to disagree with me, but some things shouldn't be here. Call me a deletionist. You are correct that episode lists of marginally notable TV series are also not very encyclopedic. JFW | T@lk 11:31, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree with you that episode lists of marginally notable TV series are not very encyclopedic. The only one I've contributed to is notable - it's the most famous show in British TV history, the longest running soap opera in the world outside America, the number 1 show in the British TV ratings again in it's 45th year and I thought it would be nice to help someone pad it out a bit. But I  guess if 30 year old Vangelis albums are considered encyclopedic, almost everything has a case to stay. Candice 11:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm sure they do, but this was voted to stay so I don't know what else I can say. You're a moderator so if you have the power to delete it and don't want it to stay, I won't mind Candice 00:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing rude about this. I was actually explaining that I was going to be collaborative. And I don't like being called Herr Doktor, given that I'm not German. JFW | T@lk 16:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

text: To be honest I was at work one day and our system was down so we were waiting for it to be started up and I was just surfing the net in the meantime. I had used Wikipedia before but never started an article and this story was all over the front page of a few papers so thought I would try starting a page and as this was recent news it probably was something that was not on here yet. Maybe I could have read the guidelines a bit closer before starting though and I will in future make sure it's perhaps more clearly notable :) Candice 01:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The BBC Have a number of pages about this man, eg http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4634401.stm  In addition to the individuals own notability, these events also serve to illuminate NPD,  Scruffy brit (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC 

message: What's become of Blackwell now? Is he in prison or a psychiatric insitution of some description? --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackwell's fate
Talk:Mentuhotep I

message: The article says Mentuhotep founded the dynasty, yet in the List of pharaohs he is placed fourth after Intef I with dates 2060-2010 BC while Intef is earlier in 2134-2117. Is there another Mentuhotep in the 21st century BC who preceded Intef?  User:FeanorStar7
:This Mentuhotep is considered to have founded the dynasty, but he was merely a local prince and is therefore not mentioned in many lists, and Mentuhotep II is numbered as Mentuhotep I instead. See Eleventh dynasty of Egypt. Fornadan (t) 9 July 2005 10:27 (UTC)
::I still ain't convinced. Since there is no reference to which King List he was refered to as an actual king, and taking Fornadan commentary above for real, I'd guess this so called Mentuhotep I is actually the first Intef (not to be confused with Intef I), who was called 'Intef the Great, son of Iku'. I base my commentary on Sir Alan Gardiner's Egypt of the Pharaohs, Oxford University Press 1961, pg 438; where the kings of the 11th dynasty are listed as: 
::1º) Sehertawy Intef I
::2º) Wahankh Intef II
::3º) Nakhtnebtepnefer Intef III
::4º) Nebhetepra Mentuhotep I
::5º) Sankhkara Mentuhotep II
::6º) Nebtawyra Mentuhotep III--SamaraDyva (talk) 12:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with dating and place in dynastic list

message: you see,in the "Mentuhotep I the great ";when I looked in the Turin King List,his name  is recorded  as Wah....... in Columm 5,Line 12 which can be restored to Wah......re,but I had to used an "citation needed " and Point out Weasel Word Problems.Can you help? Historydiver (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the point of adding unsourced material and then putting the "citation needed" template just after it. That said, if you see this reconstruction of the Turin Canon, it was estimated that Mentuhotep I should have been found in column 6, row 12 (that's Ryholt reconstruction, corresponding to 5.12 of the older one by Alan Gardiner). The sketch within the cartouche has in the past been tentatively read as "Wah[...]" (different reading has been proposed) but as pointed out, "the tiny trace makes a proper identification impossible". Lone-078 (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: what do u mean? Historydiver (talk) 15:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That at the current state of knowledge Mentuhotep I's throne name is still unknown, and it cannot be obtained from the Turin Canon. Lone-078 (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh,thanks  for info Historydiver (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible  Prenomen problem
Talk:Ionia

message: This article could really do with an update - they have found Mycenaean sherds at Miletus as well as earlier evidence of colonization than the 8th century.--Dcsmith 05:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The history section gives nothing of the early history and settlement scenarios. Alcmaeonid 17:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Except that Morris' work is copyrighted 2014 and the paragraph was in wikipedia in the form it appears in Morris in January, 2009. So it looks like Morris quoted wikipedia without attribution rather than the other way around. Tbarron (talk) 12:13, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I suggest we include an initial statement "Not to be confused with {Ionian Islands}", which are unrelated geographically or linguistically.  (Different spelling in Greek language).  I would do this myself but I'm not sure how w/o bungling it up.  Any one want to try?  Thanks,  Substar, 2018Substar (talk) 18:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with Ionia Islands 

message: As most of the direct descendants of the Ionians and other ancient anatolian or anatolian greek civilizations currently speak Turkish but are mostly of ancient anatolian or anatolian greek ancestry, the name of these civilizations should also be provided in Turkish language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lycianhittite (talk • contribs) 23:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish Name of Ionia 

message: Regarding the photo of Delos in the Infobox - would it be more appropriate to have a photo of a location in “Ionia proper” (on the coast of Anatolia) representing the geographic region of Ionia instead of the Delos picture. Because Delos, although a cultural centre of the ethnic/linguistic group ‘Ionians’, was geographically situated in the Cyclades, midway between mainland Greece and "Ionia proper” in Anatolia.
A Delos picture would have been quite appropriate for the article on the Ionians (the people) but perhaps a picture of Miletus or Mount Mycale or Ephesus would be more representative of the Ionia article.
--Marcusaurelius161 (talk) 05:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - changed.--Annielogue (talk) 22:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delos photo representing an 'Ancient Region of Anatolia'? 

message: The article says that Ionia is the setting of the novel The Ionian Mission (1981), by Patrick O'Brian.  There is confusion of placenames here.  The novel is set in the Ionian Sea, on the western side of Greece and Albania, and is not connected with the ancient province of Ionia, which was to the east of Greece proper, on the Aegean coast of Turkey.   Peter Bell (talk) 02:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ionia and the Ionian Sea 

message: Should that be Achaean female (statues)?  NB: Been there since created in 2002. MBG02 (talk) 01:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  archaic female
Template talk:National flags

message: Why does this template (Lists of flags) include a random picking of countries, plus Antarctica? How a bout merging it with Template:Nationalflags, and perhaps adding links in its header to vexillology and heraldry for reference. =J //Big Adamsky 23:22, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Randomness

message: Should a group of places with absolutely no status appear on a template of national symbols?--Peta 02:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Micronations
Category talk:Science fiction by franchise

message: I'm not sure I get the intention of this category... if we had say, categories of "time travel sci-fi series " and "space-opera sci-fi series" I could understand what was happening, but in this one everything is lumped together. --TimPope 9 July 2005 09:00 (UTC)
:There were a lot of specific science fiction franchises under :Category:Science fiction. I was trying to come up with a better way to subcategorize them, especially the ones that appear in several different media (books, films, TV series, etc). Perhaps something like a subcategory of :Category:Science fiction universes under :Category:Fictional universes would work better. MakeRocketGoNow 23:38, July 9, 2005 (UTC)
::Right, got it... another name might be better but I can't think of one ;) --TimPope 23:47, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: Result of cfd discussion was to rename this category to :Category:Science fiction by franchise.  - MakeRocketGoNow 00:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: this talk page was moved from the old category: Category:Science fiction by milieu, which has been deleted. «»Who?¿?meta 11:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Misuse of the word "franchise", when "series" is obviously meant.  This seems to be a problem in several categories, and we've noticed the mistake growing with increasing frequency on the internet among those most reliant upon it to learn English.  Wikipedia needs to not fall victim to a generation-specific misuse of a word. 12.73.196.146 01:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  franchise
Talk:Wet wipe

message: This page should no longer be a candidate for speedy deletion since moist towelettes are a significant human artifact used across the globe. If you have problems with the contents or wording of this article, make modifications, but don't delete the article.
* Maybe rewrite the article - i.e. How are they made? Do they come in different scents? As it's written right now, I think it's okay to delete, but if it rewritten and becomes an encyclopedic entry, then it might be worth keeping. --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 20:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would improve the article if a section was added outlining the environmental impact of wet wipes, particularly the so-called 'flushable' types which consumers are encouraged to flush away like toilet paper. See Fatberg.  --Ef80 (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental issues 

message: Wet wipes as an alternative to toilet paper have been around a lot longer than 2005. I've been using them since the mid-90s at least. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 13:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative to toilet paper 

message: The "Dude Wipes" brand is attempting to plug their name into the introduction paragraph of this article. 2600:1005:B02D:D7B1:79E4:6C55:BFE4:7BB1 (talk) 21:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement in Header
Talk:Respiratory acidosis

message: This article appears to be copied from eMedicine.com. If it is, this is probably a copyright violation.
From http://www.emedicine.com/termsofuse.htm:
"Copyright
We or our partners own the information on eMedicine.com., and the entire contents and design of eMedicine.com are protected under U.S. and international copyright laws. You may look at our Web site online, download individual articles to your personal or handheld computer for later reading, and even print a reasonable number of copies of pages for yourself, your family, or friends. You must not remove any copyright notices from our materials. We reserve all our other rights. Among other things, this means you must not sell our information, rewrite or modify it, redistribute it, put it on your own Web site, or use it for any commercial purpose without our prior written permission. "
--Taejo 9 July 2005 09:55 (UTC)
This article, copied or not, is too laden with hyperlinks regarding technical issues to adequately inform readers  who may need help in understanding the topic, especially if it pertains to their own or a loved one's medical condition. Therefore, his article should be extensively re-written, with some priority over other articles that simply deal with pop culture or whatever, say. Wikipedia is rapidly becoming a first port of call for unfortunates who are looking for medical information and a gateway to further knowledge, often in some condition of emotinal stress. We need to do better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.240.240.5 (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Metabolic acidosis which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The factors should be 0.008 and 0.003 in the acute and chronic respiratory acidosis equations, not 0.08 and 0.03. 75.172.16.13 (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Formulas are incorrect