Talk:List of xxxHolic characters

message: when did watanuki recieve a tape from a girl and then says "welcome back yuuko"? please site the chapter and page number  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.85.236.116 (talk) 14:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: xxxHolic Rou OAV, if you bothered looking at the reference attached to that part. ggctuk (2005) (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: yuuko

message: Didn't Yūko Ichihara and the other characters each have their own biographic pages??? 
Or is my mind simply playing tricks on me again...? 68.160.148.170 (talk) 03:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The individual characters didn't meet the Wikipedia:Notability criteria for individual articles based on the lack of independent real-world third-party coverage; so all characters are listed on a single character list per the Wikiproject Anime and Manga Manual of Style.  --Kraftlos (talk) 18:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The individual articles are still linked from here and the navbox, though, and need either cleaned up or merged and redirected here. —Dinoguy1000 18:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Then take another individual character, Layla Hamilton, for example, which is lack of independent real-world third-party coverage too. I understand your rationale but it simply makes fan-driven initiatives meaningless for the sake of "lack of coverage". Once we start clearing here and there, we are going to annihilate the in-depth analysis put out by the fans in good faith. It also ceases to be a legit venue for people who has just discovered the character and wanted to understand more about the background. (Howardchu (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a fan site;  I realize that many fans use these pages for character information; however, the threshold for inclusion on wikipedia is notability and verifiability.  Thus in-depth character analysis cannot be fan-generated; it must be published by reliable sources, otherwise that would be original research, therefore unverifiable.  Keep in mind, this is an encyclopedia, not everything is appropriate to be published on Wikipedia. --Kraftlos (talk) 01:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kraftlos, thanks for your reply and quote me about the essence, spirit of Wikipedia, specifically "it is not a fan site" in the name of "original research". So please keep on your under-appreciated efforts on cleaning up other anime / manga characters' "unverifiable", "unreliable" materials like Layla Hamilton, for example. I will just take your advice by not coming to Wikipedia anymore for contributing in anime / manga characters because a) I do not have the blessings of author / publisher with their "original research" b) I do not meet the high-standard of Wikipedia c) they are no longer considered "notable" materials according to your rationale. (Howardchu (talk) 05:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but I've noticed that Himiwari still has her own article...Yuuko should still have hers; she also plays a major part in Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicles. Just my two cents...UPDATE: I bring in Fai D. Flourite (my spelling of his name...) He has only appeared in Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicles, but he has a huge and expansive article, with no tags, that hasn't been challenged. RE-UPDATE: I also bring up Tomoyo Daidōji. She is a crossover character from Cardcaptor Sakura, who has her own article, including a reference to her appearances in Tsubasa. Thank you. 70.162.133.122 (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

text: So if Watanuki, Doumeki, and Himawari have their own pages, then why doesn't Yuuko have one at this point? Short of not meeting the criteria, that is. I mean, given the amount of info those three teens have (especially Watanuki), one would think that Yuuko should've met the standards by this point.--67.49.42.80 (talk) 03:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Odd question on that why hasn't Yuko gotten her own page yet, given that she's one of the major players in both Holic and Tsubasa like Watanuki and "Syaoran". --67.49.42.80 (talk) 09:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange... 

message: Ok, WHICH one is Maru? Moro? o-o Is the one with pink, shorter hair Moro? Or is that Maru?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.230.218.75 (talk) 03:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  totally unimportant 

message: There is nothing to indicate that Himawari's bird is important enough of a separate entity in the work to represent its own section.じんない 21:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tanpopo 

message: As the title, Yuuko is too major a character for one or two small paragraphs to do as her bio. THAT WAS WHY I undid that edit, and I will do it again soon (copying source to Notepad and editing before returning it to Wikipedia). Ggctuk (talk) 20:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There needs to be more than just in-universe information about her. That can include development, but needs more than just plot info.じんない 20:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Keep in mind that you are also free to expand her entry on this page; so long as all the information (except her plot-based character description, which should be kept to a minimum of length) is properly sourced, non-trivial, and out of universe, you can split her out when she shows sufficient independent notability and there is enough info for a decent article. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 22:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Also remember that character articles should only be created when the notability of the character can be established independently of the notability of the series. --Farix (Talk) 01:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hence why I said "sufficient independant notability". ;) 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 18:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yuuko needs her own page 

message: The article states the Japanese name for the pipe fox is "kudagitsune" while it is popularly known as "kudakitsune". Why is it written as "-gitsune" when it is referred to in the anime as "-kitsune"? 96.238.52.167 (talk) 07:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need confirmation on Pipe Fox 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on List of xxxHolic characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.phoenixanime.com/ax06/page5.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307223025/http://mantan-web.jp/2011/03/05/20110305dog00m200014000c.html to http://mantan-web.jp/2011/03/05/20110305dog00m200014000c.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.productionig.com/contents/works_sp/43_/s03_/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106231756/http://www.mania.com/tsubasa-ovas-english-cast-revealed_article_127444.html to http://www.mania.com/tsubasa-ovas-english-cast-revealed_article_127444.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mangalife.com/reviews/xxxHolicv10.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mangalife.com/reviews/xxxHOLiCv11-12.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.activeanime.com/html/content/view/69/57/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified