lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cownose ray

message: The Children's Aquarium at Fair Park in Dallas, Texas also has a touch tank of cownose rays.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100C:B224:4619:C374:B649:83CF:95C5 (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

message: Hi everyone! Here are some sources I found that would be good to use for this article:
Fisher, Robert A.; Call, Garrett C.; Grubbs, R. Dean (2013-01-01). "Age, Growth, and Reproductive Biology of Cownose Rays in Chesapeake Bay". Marine and Coastal Fisheries. 5 (1): 224–235. doi:10.1080/19425120.2013.812587.
Omori, Kristen L.; Fisher, Robert A. (2017-11). "Summer and fall movement of cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, along the east coast of United States observed with pop-up satellite tags". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 100 (11): 1435–1449. doi:10.1007/s10641-017-0654-6. ISSN 0378-1909
Fisher, Robert (2010-11-01). "Life history, trophic ecology, & prey handling by cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus, from Chesapeake Bay". Reports. doi:10.21220/m2-kp5y-b863.
Johnson, James G.; Naples, Lisa M.; Van Bonn, William G.; Kent, Angela D.; Mitchell, Mark A.; Allender, Matthew C. (2017-12). "EVALUATION OF HEALTH PARAMETERS IN COWNOSE RAYS ( RHINOPTERA BONASUS ) HOUSED IN A SEASONAL TOUCH POOL HABITAT COMPARED WITH AN OFF-EXHIBIT HABITAT". Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 48 (4): 954–960. doi:10.1638/2017-0091.1. ISSN 1042-7260
Lrokos (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography

message: — Assignment last updated by TJWinston12 (talk) 13:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology
Talk:576p

message: 576p, in the form of 1024×576, is the best 16:9 video which can be seen on 1024×768 screens – the most common monitor resolution at the moment (although if you add all the higher resolutions together, they’re more common). —Wulf (talk) 03:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1024×576 

message: Is 576p24 an allowed video format? --88.77.251.192 (talk) 17:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  576p24 

message: I've removed this claim from the article:
576p is SD quality, but it can be considered HD if the video bitrate number (kbit/s) is 8128 or higher.
This is not supported by the citation, and also doesn't make sense. "High definition" refers to resolution, not bitrate, and the effects of the bitrate vary depending on the codec used. David G (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not HD
Talk:Hetmans of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth

message: Artcl Mikhail Skopin-Shuisky refers to a suspicious hetman Jan Piotrus Sapieha. Can anyone clarify? 
I know only Paweł Jan Sapieha (anyway, Peter, Paul, what's the difference? both saints :-) someone could make a mistake), but he is from a different time. Mikkalai 03:20, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussions

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:Surveying

message: Please add. Allenazali (talk) 06:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidently deleted picture of cadastral surveys in national parks. 

message: Please add. Allenazali (talk) 06:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidently deleted picture of cadastral surveys in national parks. 

message: After his presidency, Theodore Roosevelt participated in cartographic surveys of rivers in the Amazon basin, so his exclusion from the Rushmore surveyors may not be warranted. There is something that concerns me more though. With the exception of Percy Harrison Fawcett, all of those named in the list are people who distinguished themselves primarily in some other field. They are noteworthy people who were also surveyors at one time. Would it not be more appropriate to omit these and instead acknowledge people for their achievements in surveying? I can think of a few, but not enough for a comprehensive list. --Geometricks (talk) 10:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteworthy Surveyors 

message: :Category:Topographers was separate from :Category:Surveyors; I've made the former a member of the latter. Do we want to merge them? According to Google Ngram, topographer is much less common that surveyor.  fgnievinski (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topographers and Surveyors 

message: The word “plumb” only appears once in this article. I’m not a surveyor, but I know using a plumb rule/plumb bob rule is an important part of the work. It could be linked to the plumb bob/plumb rule page as well. VAGRANTPLATYPUS (talk) 20:59, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plumbing 

message: Data 119.157.84.72 (talk) 07:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why things fall on the ground data 

message: why thing fall on the ground 
Data 119.157.84.72 (talk) 07:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physic  

message: This page is on an extremely important topic, yet it is very thin on citations. The lead paragraph doesn't even have one source for any of its claims, and citations are sparse in the document. To avoid claims of this being unsourced or original research, this page needs many more citations. GeogSage  (⚔Chat?⚔)  18:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional citations needed
Template talk:Mac-stub

message: Is there any particular reason why this stub category should be limited to OS X? -Aranel ("Sarah") 04:13, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the Windows category does not specify which version of Windows. But yes, I think it would actually be more useful to expand this template to contain what you have described. (There shouldn't be any need to create a new template. Just change the usage of this one; it would also be appropriate to change the category.) -Aranel ("Sarah") 16:28, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Done. I left the OS X in there. Let's see how that sits ... --TheParanoidOne 05:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope?

message: I was wondering if we should use the Finder icon/Mac OS logo in stead of the Tiger box?
:Image:Finder icon.png This Apple Macintosh-related article is a stub.  You can help Wikipedia by [ expanding it].
Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 02:57, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable. Seeing as the text has been changed from OSX to generic Mac, I guess the image should be, as well. --TheParanoidOne 09:09, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, did it. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:46, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Ok, I read the cited policy and see your point. Now all we have to do is think of an alternative. Any suggestions? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps something like :Image:Macintosh SE.jpg (with the table edited out, which I'd be willing to do), or something similar to :Image:Original iMac.jpg (if someone's willing to create a free version)? —Cryptic (talk) 03:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I have found a solution, to my left. It is part of the free Crystal collection in the commons. I stumbled across it 5 min ago, and have made the change. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I see that this is a great templates, but Apple articles do not only pertain to the Mac, so could we please get some iPhone, iPad and iPod templates also... espically for stubs... Thank you The Wikimon (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  We Need more templates like this...
Talk:12 gauge

message: This article is not correct because the gauge does not actually refer to the number of lead balls.  This is so, because when using a slug you are using no balls but a single slug.  Gauge can also refer to thickness of other metals. -- 209.42.65.246, 02:56, 2 Feb 2005 UTC
:I dissagree. Gauge goes refer to the number of ball required to make a pound.I think you are confusing this by thinking that the article says that a 12 gauge always has 12 balls, 20 gauge 20 balls, and so on. This would indicate that a shot gun fires a POUND of shot. A normal load might be one ounce. A 12 gauge can have 4 large balls of shot, or 100 small ones. It can have a ruber baton, fletchetts (winged nails) or as you say slugs. So, gauge is only for measuring a barrel, not indicating what is always fired from it. -- 66.140.72.204, 04:15, 2 Feb 2005 UTC
:Hey, 209.42.65.246.  You should immediately contact the editors at Oxford, Websters, et al, and let them know that the definition of gauge that they've been using for the last four hundred years is wrong.  Good luck with that.The Dogfather 14:59, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion moved from article 

message: I think this article should not be a redirect to gauge discussion.  There should be discussion here of the different 12 gauge shells, 2 3/4", 3", 3 1/2", years of introduction, etc...  Yellowking 23:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 gauge shell sizes 

message: The Gauge (bore diameter) article's hatnote is becoming a paragraph of its own.
12 Gauge may refer to:
In firearms:
* Caliber, for firearms other than shotguns
* Gauge (bore diameter)
* Gauge, disambiguation page
In music:
* 12 Gauge (album), 2010 album by Finnish band Kalmah
* Emerson Drive, former name of Canadian rock group
– Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 03:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for disambiguation page?
Talk:Francisco de Ulloa

message: I like the information you put on your page about Francisco, however,it's missing the day he was born and were he was born. To help other fourth graders, since the birth dale is required, I think that you should put his birth place and date.
:I was wondering about that as well. Any birth date? -- Thorpe talk 17:47, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an assertion that Ulloa's reports helped people think California is an island, although they are described as clearly saying it wasn't, and the related Wikipedia entries on Hernando de Alarcón and Island of California both say that it was thought of as a peninsula for some time after Ulloa (eg in Mercator and Ortelius maps), and the island misconception came back later. Perhaps the reports did somehow help the 'island' theory, but it's not clear how, so a citation would be useful. Peace Makes Plenty (talk) 13:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for mistaking California for an island

message: The citation (LOST SHIP OF THE DESERT) does not support the claim in the article. אביהו (talk) 06:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost Ship of the Desert
Talk:Attachment theory

message: — Assignment last updated by Kph7917 (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: — Assignment last updated by Asegura01 (talk) 00:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Equitable Futures - Internet Cultures and Open Access

message: Added paragraph titled "Uses Within Probation Practice" under Crime. PeterBuon (talk) 00:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crime Section Additions
Talk:James Russell Lowell

message: Make Wikipedia articles consistent.  Add in the top sidebar for this subject the standard summary of his political appointments.
Propagate this fix across all articles on persons in Wikipedia.
Jimlue (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry...What do you mean by "sidebar"? And, Wikipedia articles, by definition, are not entirely consistent, even if you want to "propagate this fix across all articles on persons on Wikipedia". I'm afraid It's doubtful your comment here would result in such massive edits. --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sidebar

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on December 22, 2019. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2019-12-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|James Russell Lowell - 1855.jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Revised Lives : Whitman, Religion, and Constructions of Identity in Nineteenth-Century Anglo-American Culture by William Pannapacker says "Lowell was proclaimed by many critics to have written the greatest poetic summation of the Civil War and tribute to Lincoln in his “Commemoration Ode" " (p. 93). Is this the same one he presented at Harvard? Is it independently notable? Does it merit more of a mention here? Eddie891  Talk Work  23:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly the same poem and that's some high praise... I for one find Lowell's "Commemoration Ode" tedious so I'm not sure it's a common reaction. --Midnightdreary (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looking further into this, Pannapacker cites Aaron, The Unwritten War p. 70 for that paragraph Looking at my copy of Aaron, I see nothing of the sort. However, I have found some pretty high praise including "PROBABLY most literary critics and lovers of verse, if they were asked to name the finest single poem by an American writer, would accord that distinction to James Russell Lowell's Commemoration Ode." Foxcroft, F. 1918, LOWELLS "COMMEMORATION ODE", American Periodicals Series II, Boston. Eddie891  Talk Work  01:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Goodness... These "most literary critics and lovers of verse" need some better taste! --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commemoration Ode? 

message: An editor has suggested a new organizational structure for this article (see version here), which creates a new section on "Personal life" rather than spattering those details chronologically throughout the biography. I'm posting here for some opinions from other editors and would love to hear more. --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizational structure
Talk:EMD GP30

message: EMD Demonstrator #5629 Re#1962 became UP #875. EMD Demonstrator #5639 became SAL #534. Source http://community-1.webtv.net/ajkristopans/ROADSWITCHERS567/ --4.224.117.123 19:19, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

message: This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 19:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been delisted per WP:GAR for failure to meet GA criteria. Once the article has been brought up to standards, it may be renominated for GA. Regards, LaraLoveT/C 20:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review
Talk:Jigawatt

message: in the 1980s nuclear houses offered 1.1 jigawatts of power. However you needed 1.21 jigawatts of power to power the flux capacitor. This flux capacitor figured out the magnetic waves that surround the earth and its current radio frequencies. When frequencies are sent out, there is a past and present to them. So in the 1980s, about the only source you could get 1.21 gigawatts of power from was a lightning bolt or a very controlled power source, with much resistance to bring down amps. Lightning was a source of 1.21 jigawatts in the 1980s. Of course, this could be a fictional discussion. --Cyberman 05:23, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Do we really need a separate article to discuss how a movie pronounced a single word? This kind of information is best stated in Back to the Future or flux capacitor article. <-- #fakenews (At any rate it is misleading to call it a fictional unit, because they certainly were actually trying to use a real one.) Eric119 05:19, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is necessary! 

message: In principle I agree with the fact that Jigawatt probably doesn't need its own entry. However, when the word I'm looking up isn't even in the entry that it redirects to, I come away thoroughly confused. To make it clearer: Jigawatt isn't even mentioned in that article this redirects to. That means that someone who doesn't know what a Jigawatt is will only find out that it (apparently) has to do with a time machine from an 80s movie. This is not optimal --Kamagurka (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This redirect isn't helping
Talk:On the Justice of Roosting Chickens

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/On the Justice of Roosting Chickens.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 23:16, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: This is a rather rambling essay, not encyclopedic material.Zantastik 05:38, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Now it's totally new. -- Toytoy 08:17, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
* Since there was a copyvio notice, you should have created the new version in the /Temp subpage. I have re-added the VfD notice since there is still a vote going on, although I imagine that the votes against the old version will not be applied to the newer one (but again, this could have been avoided by using /Temp). -- Curps 19:54, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new start 

message: I wouldn't call Churchill a scholar but rather a polemicist. Эйрон Кинни (t) 01:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a polemic, but he has done scholarly work, of varying quality. --Tothebarricades 21:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scholar" 
Talk:Ammeter

message: Could someone explain how to convert a current meter to a voltmeter using a resistor?
:Easy...you simply attach the ammeter and a huge resistor in series, and hook up the two ends of this "voltmeter" circuit to the two positions in the target circuit you want to measure the potential difference between.  Then, you measure the current running through this part of the circuit (it will be small because of the huge resistor).  You now have the resistance, and the current through this voltmeter circuit, and therefore can calculate the potential difference with V=IR. Ed Sanville 02:46, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am trying to work out how to intergrate this into wiki, do you people think this is worth an article?mickpc
COULD SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHY WE ARE USING MI INSTRUMENT FOR AC AND MC FOR BOTH AC AND DC......?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.200.82 (talk) 09:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: current to voltage

message: What will happen if an ammeter is connected in parallel with a resistor ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.147.177.226 (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammeter 

message: ". Not used in practice due to non-linearity of the scale."
I have a couple of commercial products that incorporate moving iron meters.  Will edit.
Tabby (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving iron 

message: It's the The Instrument Sketch Book, published by Weston Electrical Instruments, Newark, NJ. Nikevich (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A superb reference, if a copy can be found

message: Today I edited the "Application" section by merging into it my edited version of the article "Ayrton shunt", which was a stub. I haven't yet figured out how to import the image from that stub, nor how to remove the stub.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derfnac (talk • contribs) 21:14, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: This article needs to have an Ammeter circuit symbol ! Darkman101 (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammeter Circuit Symbol 

message: With regards to link 8, "Ix Innovations, LLC. "PocketPico Ammeter Theory of Operation" (PDF). Retrieved 2014-07-11.", someone else seems to own the domain now. The link seems to be dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1135:C2FA:109F:C168:8624:824 (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: The long Application section (lots of content about shunts) could be subdivided - eg. into high current (using shunts), DC, AC ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The long Application section could be subdivided  

message: Shunt resistor redirects to this article - which then links to shunt (electrical). Some content about shunts could be moved to the shunt article ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shunt resistor
Talk:Tony Esposito

message: This page is now included on the French Wikipedia. Someone should probably add that on the sidebar.  
:The French Wikipedia link to their Tony Esposito article has been added.  I took out the Netherlands Wikipedia link to a Tony Esposito article because it was apparently about an Italian musician or singer born in July 1950.  H Padleckas 01:36, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Question P

message: Question: how were the candidates election when there were three-member districts?
Tabletop 06:00, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trelane

message: When Trelane intercepted the fleeing Enterprise and teleported Kirk back to Gothos, Kirk commented about the destruction of the machine; Trelane made several comments in return. Among them: "And did you really think that was the only medium of instrumentality at my command?" and "And this time my instrumentality is unbreakable." Logically, neither of these statements implies the machine was necessary, but within the context of the story it seems clear the writers intended the viewer to believe it was. There is no evidence in the story that the machinery was a ruse, and some evidence that it was not. Before I edit the article to reflect this, I thought I'd give other readers a chance to comment. -- Balok 00:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Canon evidence that the machine was not a ruse

message: If this should be merged with anything, I think it's the entry for "The Squire of Gothos." It reads like a synopsis of the episode. Gotham23 (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:Lena Park

message: Please leave this at "Lena Park" not "Lena Junghyun Park". "Lena Park" is the most common name for English speakers. See Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28common_names%29 Kappa 09:34, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:DONKEY.BAS

message: I've removed the following paragraph which was added by 24.168.71.81:
: There are rumors of a flash-based parody game that combines Donkey and Custer's Revenge into DNKYPNCH.BAS.
I think this is a joke but if it's a real rumour it could be restored with a reference. Google web and groups searches for that name don't return anything. Andy Smith (talk) 01:05, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  DNKYPNCH.BAS 

message: OK, I've looked at the GWBasic and QBasic images side by side, and besides the fact that the two shots show the game with different scores, and with donkey and car in different positions, I cannot make out the slightest difference. Assuming that there IS a difference it must be quite slight so why is it worth even mentioning, let alone illustrating with 2 images?!? --Ericjs (talk) 04:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 images 