lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Melissa (computer virus)

message: The article links to Fredrik Bjorck as being key in discovering the author. The referenced source says: "Richard M. Smith, president of software tools developer Phar Lap Software Inc., and Fredrik Bjorck, a Swedish PhD student at Stockholm University's Department of Computer and System Sciences, have tracked down the virus writer to at least one specific Web site".
Now I'm not certain that hte Fredrik Björk wikilinked in this article and the referenced person in the source is the same person. I found www.bjorck.com that made me think the football player and de discoverer are not the same person so until proven they are the same person, I removed the wikilinks. Can anyone confirm this? Felsir 13:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fredrik Björck, the football player? 

message: Shouldn't this be listed as a virus? it replicates and attaches to Word.
Sephiroth storm (talk) 19:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A virus is a program that replicates, on a computer, without the user's explicate permission.  A worm is a virus that replicates from one computer to another.  Melissa was a worm, which is a subset of virus. [[User:dschrader  16 July 2009]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dschrader (talk • contribs) 18:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A worm is not a virus.  A worm is a self-replicating program that uses a network to send copies of itself to other nodes on a network and tend to impact network efficiency. A virus however infects a file and requires another program as a transmission method. Melissa requires Outlook Express and that you open not just the e-mail but also the attached Microsoft word file so that the macro will execute and Melissa can mass mail itself. It does not merely send itself over the network by itself. Therefore it is a virus. It actually mentions this in much truncated form in the beginning of the article itself.(Drizzt380 (talk) 07:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Virus or Worm?

message: A few of the sources for this page are way out of date and some of the information on the page is wholly erroneous and not listed on any of the citations. Definitely in need of a referential overhaul. 66.99.172.59 (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New sources? 

message: I think adequate context has been added after the page has been overhauled. Is it enough to remove the banner message? CybersecChloe (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Template?
Talk:Hugh Glass

message: with in notation [14][15][16] it says "no bone was broken", but then several paragraphs down it said "he has festering wounds, a broken leg"... 45.53.110.212 (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Ashley's 1823 expedition 

message: The season 1, episode 15 of Wagon Train, titled "The Cliff Grundy Story," written by Aaron Spelling, seems to be loosely based on or inspired by the story of Hugh Glass, with guest character suffering a near fatal injury in a buffalo hunt, presumed to be a goner and the others want to leave him behind, except for the show's hero, Flint McCullough who insists on staying with him, despite hostile natives in the area. Sure enough he recovers, the other fellow who stayed behind dumps out their water and steals their horse, forcing the pair to endure a long hike through the desert, during which they fight a bear which Cliff Grundy kills with a knife. Finally, they make it to a fort and find the man who stole their supplies was killed by a Native American. Wikiuser847843636 (talk) 02:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Need a reliable source, original thought can not be used. Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 04:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture addendum 

message: The name is mentioned once in the article, referring to "Yount's story"; but with no further explanation, and the name does not appear in the cited source. So who is (or was) Yount? George C. Yount? Harry Yount? Or some other? Haploidavey (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it does appear under the linked article sources, so I've added full name, George C. Yount (we've an article on him) and other details. I think that will do. Haploidavey (talk) 18:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Yount?
Talk:Yosemite Valley

message: Why no mention of the Martindale mummies? They were bodies of a mother and child discovered in Yosemite by miners in 1885 (another site says 1891). The mother was nearly seven feet tall.
*http://www.sideshowworld.com/Blow-OffMDmummies.html
*http://www.geocities.com/age_of_giants/ancient_giants/sitecah.html
--RyanTee82 (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Martindale mummies?

message: Two problems.
Penultimate paragraph under "The Mariposa Battalion" has two spellings for this artist's name. The link in the caption for the illustration goes to a page on someone with that name who was a South African ornithologist and is not described as an artist; was it the same man? Cognita (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ayres or Ayers? Link OK? 

message: Not sure if this old photograph dated 1878-1881 is of any use. 
Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Old photo
Talk:Sun Records

message: The introduction says: recording Black artists, and  to get Black music . 
I'd suggest: write "recording black artists", and "to get black music" (even better: let's describe 'black music', instead of using a label). Or is there a new political-correctness, capitalising Black? -DePiep 14:06, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ''recording Black artists - capital B?''

message: The Cy Coben authorship has been noted elsewhere, as at this site.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Steve Pastor (talk • contribs) 15:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baby, Let's Play House

message: The information on other companies that have nothing to do with this one should be removed from the article. Propaniac (talk) 20:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject of the article is "Sun Records". However I have split off an article for Sun Records not run by Sam Phillips as Sun Records (other companies). Further improvements welcome.  -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other companies known as Sun Records 

message: The official (so solely right) names of this record company from 1952 to 1969 are Sun Record Company and Sun Record Co., Inc.. Its registered label is Sun, bought in 1969 by Sun International Corporation, renamed in 1987 to Sun Entertainment Corporation.
So, this article alleges the unofficial alias of the company. Is it a function of Wikipedia?
RocknRollArchivist (talk) 10:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's not be so legalistic. It is quite common on Wikipedia to use the commonly used name, which is simply "Sun Records". I think it's safe to assume that the vast majority of people familiar with the label, including many of the artists, knew it as "Sun" or "Sun Records". Sundayclose (talk) 15:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Sun Records, but Sun Record Company
Talk:Heather Christensen (Model)

message: *Pretty worthless:
'Heather Christensen was Playboy's 2001 Model of the Year. In 2002, she posed as a mermaid in the Wet and Wild 2002 edition.  
Heather is also an avid skateboarder.  
http://www.skateparkoftampa.com/spot/imageviewer.aspx?img=images/locals/heatherbowlcarve.jpg  '
Its orphaned, not suprisingly.
*Keep. Playboy Models of the Year are famous, among other things. Everyking 21:54, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: From VfD
Talk:Hitachinaka, Ibaraki

message: That image is going to be deleted, look at it's commons page.  But the uploader gives his permission to use it here, so if someone took the time to copy it and use it somewhere else, it could stay, but until someone does that, it will be pictureless. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 21:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Iruma, Saitama

message: Isn't this city also known as Irumagawa? WhisperToMe 07:59, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: She isn't from Iruma city but Iruma "gun"(=district).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.86.88.54 (talk) 10:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hitomi Yoshizawa
Talk:Ise, Mie

message: Isn't this city also known as Ujiyamada? WhisperToMe 07:59, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ujiyamada town founded Uji town(near Naiku) and Yamada town(near Geku) in 1889. Ujiyamada town was incorporated as a city in September 1, 1906. And Ujiyamada city was renamed Ise city in Jan. 1, 1955. So Ujiyamada station is in Ise city. There are some images of Ise in Wikimedia commons about “Ise Shrine”, and so on. I'm sorry but I can write English very little, so please add to the article.  Thank you.202.91.210.144 09:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:New Haven (disambiguation)

message: Is it appropriate to use this to disambiguate Newhaven? PML
::I added disambiglulation to Newhaven (disambiguation), as I moved the original Newhaven to include (disambigulation) in title for consistency with other disambigulation articles. kylet 12:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anti-Masonry/Early Archive

message: Temporary note: I have placed this notice here to bring to the attention of any new reader that the text below referes to the edits logged in the history page as I have unbiased its content as far as is possible, good luck with it!. Faedra 01:47, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: This article is POV, without doubt, but that, to me, is the least significant problem with it.  Hostility to Free Masons simply can't be understood without a discussion of the history of Masonry.  One reason that the Masons are accused of infiltration is that the Masons did infiltrate.  One reason they are accused of Satanism is their roots in quasi-Templar rites dating from the Crusades that can be easily confused or interpreted that way.  Most importantly, though, is the long, long, long history of nations officially outlawing the Free Masons.  In particular, Roman Catholic nations of Europe had such laws fitfully in the past, and Masons were regarded as on par with Jesuits in England through the 19th century (i.e. very bad).  The US was rather unique in having no anti-Masonic laws.  Later, Canada and Australia similarly either ignored their British inheritance along these lines or repealed such laws.  Finally, American Masons are very different from the older European rites.  The Masons who were opposed in Europe wouldn't have been seen driving a miniature car in a parade.
It's not a bad article, and I think the author tried to be neutral, but the subject can't be discussed without a survey of the history.  I wish I could provide a good history so that I could help the piece. Geogre 03:08, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  History lacking 

message: Shouldn't the page be renamed to something better like "Arguments against freemasonry"? cesarb 03:06, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: This page was listed on votes for deletion.  Please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Anti-Masonry for the results of the debate. -- AllyUnion (talk) 06:00, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes for deletion results
Talk:Epistemic minimalism

message: Just a note that ever since I took Epistemology in undergraduate philosophy back in 1994, I've always thought that the so-called "Gettier Problem" is flawed (i.e. that there is no problem) and that justification was not needed for knowledge (i.e., knowledge=true belief). I wrote a draft paper about it back then and asked the dean of the department to look it over.  He wasn't very encouraging. I've only recently become aware of Sartwell's article in 1991 and wish I had known about it way back when. —B|Talk 21:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurrah for Crispin Sartwell
Talk:Foreign relations of Tonga

message: * I don't think Tonga broke relations with the UK?! Really?! - Muhamed
* Fiji could not validly have filed a complaint about the Minerva Reefs with the International Seabed Authority, as that body has no authority regarding maritime boundaries. The proper body is the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. However, as I find no reference to this matter on the Commission's Website, I have not made any change to this article. I suggest the author pursue the matter further. 207.29.128.161 18:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: "Diplomatic relations with Austria."  I don't know whether they're referencing actual relations, or referencing the Austrian ambassador to Australia being accredited non-residentially to Tonga. - ILBobby (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets wait and see as relations were changed from consular to diplomatic in the Austrian 2004 yearbook(p. 356) Semsûrî (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Austria
Talk:Stephen Pearl Andrews

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I've started to expand the article on pantarchy. The universology article could also use some clarification. Several of Andrews' major work are now online at Google Books for those brave, or foolhardy, enough to wade in. Libertatia 19:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pantarchy and Universology 

message: All that stuff about "wage theory", those supposed quotes, they're all bullshit. Here's the text cited, none of that stuff is there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.83.209.67 (talk) 00:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree with you. 93.45.229.98 (talk) 13:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wage Theory 

message: Jeff Riggenbach's LvMI article is one of the primary sources for biographical information on Stephen Pearl Andrews, and I'm not sure it fits Wiki:RS criteria. It's not third-party, but rather a libertarian writing sympathetically about an anarchist on a non peer-reviewed libertarian website. I think we should structure the biographical information around a better RS, like the Texas State Historical Association's entry  on Andrews, or something else. AttackTheRivers (talk) 03:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical source 

message: Many things written are not supported by the sources or differ greatly with various biographies (e.g. one of the best known "the Pantarch" by Madeleine B. Stern). 93.45.229.98 (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: For example: "author of several books on the labor movement and individualist anarchism". What would these works be? 93.45.229.98 (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy disputed
Talk:Kosovo/Archive 2

message: What format should this page have? It looks pretty ugly, but perhaps the country format is not the right one? Is there something to give it some consistancy with other similar types of entity?2toise 12:48, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually subnational entities have the same format as national entities, see American states for that. Nikola 11:55, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Made some reorganisations to put it in the same format as other places, all content is preserved. 2toise 12:50, 29 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Other
Talk:Authenticity (philosophy)

message: The section "Views of authenticity" ends cryptically with the phrase "the notion of authenticity". 171.64.128.168 22:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo? 

message: I think the poem by Lao Tzu from the Tao Te Ching should be removed because it is unencyclopedic here. Andries 13:48, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tao Te Ching 

message: British philosophy sees authenticity as the continuation of dualism? In that case they have very poorly read the philosophers involved - Heidegger's whole project revolves around cutting across that object/subject divide and contains fairly hefty criticsm of Descartes.
Heidegger is German. 206.74.74.42 03:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authenticity today 

message: The Bad faith article needs help from available editors. HkFnsNGA (talk) 06:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The [[Bad faith]] article needs help from available editors 

message: "Nietzsche’s view of authenticity is an atheist interpretation of Kierkegaard"—but we know that Nietzsche never read Kierkegaard, so his view cannot be an interpretation of Kierkegaard's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.162.37 (talk) 17:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nietzsche and Kierkegaard 

message: Adorno is mentioned in passing regarding music, yet he wrote an influential book called "The Jargon of Authenticity" (1964).
Without this book a source, the article suffers greatly. If nothing else, it's an early use of the term as currently understood. Adorno deplored the term -- you could say that's half the point of the book. It was translated in the 1970s and is widely known.
More accurately, the book takes digs at Heidegger and deplores the suddenly widespread and vapid post-war use of this (1927) Heideggerian term "authenticity." Seems there was a bit of righteous anger with Heidegger.
I don't think you give Heidegger enough credit for the term's current prevalence. Heideggerians would be outraged.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:39A0:3720:44C7:D824:9D68:9BD6 (talk) 01:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Heidegger, Adorno

message: Perhaps genuineness and genuinity should have a redirect page to here? --Rashba (talk) 06:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect pages
Talk:Interstate 238

message: I think there are a little too many parentheses in the lead. Is it possible to at least reduce them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by I love the interweb! (talk • contribs) 00:14, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: @User84838: I don't know what this comment is supposed to mean, but looking at the lead, there are two sets of parentheses, both containing needed abbreviations. Based on the number, I'd say that there are not too many, and based on the purpose, I'd say that they can't be reduced. Imzadi 1979 →  22:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentheses
Talk:Kenshō

message: Is the OBC still part of the Soto-su? Or is it an independent organisation?
* Seikai Luebke, Why Are Roshi Jiyu Kennett’s Disciples So Reclusive?:
:
* Kyogen Carlson sensei, In Memoriam, Houn Jiyu Kennett Roshi:
:
* Order of Buddhist Contemplatives, About Us (emphasis mine, except for "Wider Buddhist Connections"):
:
Apparantly not. In that case, Jiyu-Kennett's ideas do not belong under the header of Soto, but under a separate header. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems fair to me. If her organizations are not part of a Soto organization, then I would say that her views belong in the section concerning her account of her experience, but not as the view of any other organization. Looking at a couple of references last night, I saw that kensho and satori are often treated as synonyms, but kensho tends more to be used to refer to 'moments' of insight, whereas satori is for the totality of an enlightenment experience. That makes Jiyu-Kennett's use of 'kensho' to refer to the entire process less representative of the general use of the term, according to the MacMillian Encyclopedia of Buddhism and the Shambhala Dictionary of Buddhism and Zen. --Spasemunki (talk) 23:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Buddhist Contemplatives 

message: The section on Kenshō#Classical accounts contains info on "mystical experiences" which Dogen and Keizan had. This is off-topic; this article is on kensho, not on miraculous events and auspicious signs. Faure, Williams, and Bodiford, the only sources that can be verified, do not use the term "mystical experience" to describe these events; for Dogen, Bodiford speaks of "miraculous experiences" (p.32), while Faure speaks about "auspicious signs" (p.92). Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for checking the sources. JimRenge (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogen, Keizan, and "mystical experiences" 

message: The redirect Talk:Kensh? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  TartarTorte 16:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Talk:Kensh?]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Eastern Front (World War II)

message: The article, accurately, states "Among the most prominent volunteer army formations was the Spanish Blue Division ...".  Spain provided 47,000 volunteers in the Blue Division.  There was another 2,269 in the Blue Legion. And there was the Blue Squadron of aviators and ground crew. Though less documented, there were Spanish volunteers in the Waffen-ᛋᛋ.  They also provided medical services and cooperation. All of the aforementioned were deployed on the Eastern Front.
Spain also provided Germany naval, airbase, communications, and intelligence cooperation, as well as strategic materials.  They were neutral during the war, so should not be listed as a combatant.  However, their involvement would likely warrant inclusion under "Support" à la the present Allied listing. Thoughts? Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 01:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spain under "Support" in InfoBox? 

message: I would like to add some additional citations to the article, as per requested by the bar at the top of the article page. I am unable to do this right now, however. Robertjhennigan (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2024 

message: There seems to be an extra article merged into this one, I don't think the disappearance of an Austro-Hungarian soldier in 1918 is relevant to the eastern front, as well as the two see also sections.
@Davidgoodheart, did you mean to do this? NotEvil(1); (talk) 04:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappearance of Ondrej Sobola
Talk:Hague

message: I think the vast majority of people in English will be referring to The Hague (in the Netherlands) and not the Norman area, so I'm redirecting this here - I'll put a note on the top of that article referring to Hague, France instead. This is especially relevant since the presence or absence of "The" shouldn't really be a distinguishing factor since one is "Den Haag" and the other "La Hague" - both translate the same, so omitting the "the" is down to usage either way. - IMSoP 16:14, 9 May 2004 (UTC)