Talk:Translational Genomics Research Institute

message: The hyperlinks originally inserted here (in this section of the "Talk:" page) (on March 6, 2016) are based upon this version of the article; -- which was the current (most recent) version, as of March 6, 2016. That version is also known as the "03:11, 14 February 2015" version of the article. 
The second entry in the "TGen_in_the_news" section of the article, has a hyperlink that displays as "'Dramatic results' for cancer drug; tumors shrinking, TGen researchers report" [0] and points to (links to) the URL http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0528cancer0526.html [1]. 
However, that URL -- call it "[1]" -- is (as of March 6, 2016) a Dead link. As of March 6, 2016, the URL "[1]" auto-forwards to http://www.azcentral.com/404.html [2] which is a dead end. The web page at "[2]" displays messages such as "OOPS!
This page exists to tell you 
that this page doesn't exist."and it also displays a picture of a single-toothed bear/clown character holding (like a paid astroturfer) a sign that just says "404". 
An unsuccessful attempt was made (on March 6, 2016) to get help from the Wayback machine archives. That attempt led to a ["result"] page (see the "archive dot org" page) -- call it "[3]" -- which said:"Sorry.
This URL has been excluded from the Wayback Machine."and while it did not go in to detail about how the excluding was done, the excluding "might" have been done via a "robots.txt" file. 
There did seem to be some (partial?) success, when trying to use the internal search capability feature of the http://www.azcentral.com/ web site.  Searching there (on March 6, 2016) for the character string "[0]" (see above) led to [some ads, and] one "hit", which pointed to http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/scottsdale/2015/06/20/melanoma-trial-begins-new-cancer-drugs/29025443/ [4]. I do not know whether that corresponds to (or even "is similar to" in any way) the erstwhile web page that used to be at "[1]". However, since it was found via a search for the text that is displayed for the URL "[1]", I think that it might be helpful to add some explanatory (and maybe apologetic) verbiage -- including the [search result "hit"] URL "[4]" -- to that "second entry" in the "TGen_in_the_news" section of the article. 
Any advice, or other comments? --Mike Schwartz (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dead link]] seen in the "[[Translational_Genomics_Research_Institute#TGen_in_the_news|TGen_in_the_news]]" section  

message: Following should be used as a source of citations for the article rather than residing in the article as a section.
Section name: TGen in the news
*International TGen-led team finds link between brain protein and Alzheimer's disease
*: this link, a TGen press release, appears dead; an archive.org link: https://web.archive.org/web/20090228103405/https://www.tgen.org/news/index.cfm?newsid=1226 
*'Dramatic results' for cancer drug; tumors shrinking, TGen researchers report
*: this appears to be permanently dead
*Cancer-drug trials show promise
*: redirects to a source archive page: http://archive.azcentral.com/business/articles/2008/04/16/20080416biz-tgenfund0416side.html
*: archive.is retention: http://archive.li/wr3Bb
*5-year-old TGen Fights for Funding
*Research Team Identifies Human 'Memory Gene'
*TGen may have found Lou Gehrig's trigger
*Study finds big impact on economy from TGen
*A look at future of biosciences
*Scientist pushes genome knowledge
*Personalized medicine links treatment to genetics
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section removed from main 

message: https://www.azcentral.com/search/TGen/ --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: This might be a good citation source