lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Theomatics

message: I feel that calling A.B. Leever anonymous is at the current time not true. On the first page of his website, that is references in this article, he says;
 "I am Tim Hayes, "a believer" in Jesus Christ, whom I know and love. I have 
 written these articles for myself and others in hopes that they will help us
 in our journey after God. As in all things, test what is here with
 scripture. I welcome your thoughts, encouragement and challenges." 
According to the WayBackMachine Internet Archive he hadn't disclosed his name as of July 26th 2013.I propose a change to all the A.B. Leever sources to correctly say Tim Hayes. If there are no opposition I will change:
 An analysis and criticism of theomatics has been published anonymously by
 "A. B. Leever".
to:
 An analysis and criticism of theomatics has been published by
 Tim Hayes previously under the pseudonym "A. B. Leever".
And the other mention I will change:
 A response to the findings was posted by A. B. Leever.
to:
 A response to the findings were posted by Tim Hayes.
And of course fix the citations. Thanks for the feedback and if no one says anything I will assume I can go ahead.--Кwiztas (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section 

message: I have nominated this article to be reviewed for violations of the Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy of Wikipedia, based on the following observations:
# There is an ongoing edit war between a single anonymous user and several registered Wikipedians.
# The anonymous user apparently never reads the discussion page. Attempts by User:Audacity to communicate with him/her through notes in the text have failed.
# The anonymous user repeatedly replaces balanced criticism of "theomatics" with unsourced and unencyclopedic claims about an unnamed "highly qualified German statistician". As a highly qualified professional mathematical statistician myself, with 35 years in the field, I find these statistical claims frankly laughable.
— Aetheling 07:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Edit War

message: The Jewish(74=J10+E5+W23+I9+S19+H8) Bible - Torah(47=T20+O+R18+A1+H8) & Tanak(4=T20+A1+N14+A1+K11) - was originally written primarily in Hebrew with some books being written in Aramaic. The scribes used gematria in both languages and I've added Aramaic to the article. - Brad Watson, Miami (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hebrew/Aramaic gematria 
Talk:USS Mississippi (BB-23)

message: The article says She departed Philadelphia November 1 for a fleet rendezvous at Gravesend Bay, England, on November 16, and then sailed December 7 for Brest, France, arriving on November 9.
How did she sail December 7 for Brest, France but arrived there November 9? Surely it didn't take 11 months to get there and surely she didn't arrive a month before she set sail.
So if anyone knows the correct dates, please fix. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 23:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date issue
Talk:White band disease

message: The article was reconstructed completely.  Scientific articles were added as references.  Existing references were organized neatly.  Existing information was categorized into sections and added to with data from various sources.  Grammar and capitalization were checked, and transitions were added within the article to improve flow.  New information added and organized in subsequent sections.  The effects of climate change and impacts on society were added as well.  Broken internal links were removed from the article.  For a full comparison of the previous and current versions, check the view history tab. 
The information added to the article expands upon the ecological impact of the disease and how it effects the world as a whole.  The protection and conservation of coral reefs is crucial to maintaining the fish populations for the world as a whole as well.Bantol13795 (talk) 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I studied this disease this semester too… just putting it out there that some things need to be fixed. It was good that this got updated, but a number of the sources are pretty old, and do not reflect the current state of research, such as Green—always make sure to put dates on any citations, not just on Wikipedia! Specifically, we really shouldn't be so fuzzy about what the disease is, because marine biologists have come up with a working definition in which "white band" exclusively refers to the Caribbean coral disease, since Green's article was published. And there is a bit more known about the disease's transmission and likely pathogen. It will be a good while before I have time to address this, but anyone else who wants to work on this article meanwhile should be aware of these issues. —innotata 20:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions
Talk:2005–06 FA Premier League

message: __TOC__
Sad as it may be, we may as well already write "the 2005/06 Premiership will be won by Chelsea by a margin of at least 15 points, and probably nearer 25".
:Yeah, thats why MUFC are 7 points adrift. 202.72.156.52 03:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I have restored colour coding and tried to address points raised by Green Tentacle. The CL qualification spots are now in lighter green. I'd like to point out that West Ham's UEFA Cup spot has at least something to do with the league standings, as it's dependent on Liverpool's position (well, at least until the FA Cup final :). Conscious 06:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour coding 

message: Hi guys! I am interested in coming up with another column in the league table to highlight the rewards of each club. Such as "UEFA Champions League group stage" or "UEFA Cup as the FA Cup winner", etc. This is to be done without the colour coding. Can anyone teach me? Thanks. Kiwi8 11:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarks column 

message: This section is needs to be NPOV'd before it can go up: ed g2s • talk 09:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on each team

message: Just having a quick skim at the page and i noticed the supposed "league table" with oxford united and stoke and other random teams in random positions, THIS NEEDS ADRESSING  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.55.142 (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What The Hell Is Going On
Talk:Pyotr Kozlov

message: Any particular reason for moving this to a longer name (Pyotr Kuzmich Kozlov) instead of leaving it at just Pyotr Kozlov?  In general, shorter names are preferred unless longer name is needed for disambiguation.  Russian names are usually more commonly used in English without a patronymic.  Is Pyotr Kozlov really better known to the English-speaking audience as Pyotr Kuzmich?—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 22:22, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I heartily agree with the above-said. When starting this page with a patronimic I thought there could be other eminent Pyotr Kozlovs, e.g., the blind poet. On checking this, I see that the poet was named Ivan, so I remove patronimic altogether. --Ghirlandajo 20:24, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name style

message: Is the birthdate the Eastern or Western calender? I think, there should be both. -- Derim Hunt 14:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Name style
Talk:Battle of Lake Maracaibo

message: Very rough English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.206 (talk) 21:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machine translated? 
Talk:Battle of the Cosmin Forest

message: This article will be expanded within the next 3-5 days. --Anittas 22:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Which war was this battle a part of? It is not linked from any related history articles! Not to mention it is unreferenced.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which war? 

message: The article currently mentions "Frederick of Brandenburg" as the elector in 1494, but Johann Cicero was the elector then. Any source on Frederick of Brandenburg? Olessi 19:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know anymore. I lost all sources after being burned-out. Feel free to change it. Maybe some day I'll get back to this article. At the moment, most of my energy is wasted on RfCs and other crap. --Anittas 19:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederick of Brandenburg 

message: In fact, Stephen's raid in Galicia, during which he reached as far as Lvov, occured in July 1498, in retaliation for the devastation suffered by Moldavia at the hands of John Albert's army. Gyula19 08:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has a lot of mistakes, this wouldn't be the only one. --Alex:Dan 14:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please, do improve it! You are more than welcome. :Dc76\talk 14:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have enough to improve on ro.wp... --Alex:Dan (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fine, no problem. Then, let me know when you are done with this article on ro.wiki, and I wouold use your work to correct here. :Dc76\talk 12:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate information 

message: According to the polish sources was back sy army of Stephen ottoman, wallachian and tatar contigents (in all 10,000).  Doncseczznánje 05:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ottomans into the battle 

message: the page is written from a ridiculously pro-Polish point of view --Ghirla-трёп- 18:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: There is no need for the hyphen between "the" and "then" - "then" functions perfectly well as an adjective on its own, so you don't need the hyphenMaelli (talk) 14:46, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A grammatical tip
Talk:Battle of Porto Praya

message: "Unfortunately, some of the French ships weren't ready for action, so Suffren had to withdraw."
Unfortunatly for whom, and why does the author consider that to be unfortunate?  Should an encyclopedia tell us it was unfortunate, or tell us what happened and leave us to draw our own conclusions.  I would argue the latter, as would the Wikipedia policies and guidelines, especially on NPOV.  Chrisfow 15:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Category talk:Mountains and hills of Northern Ireland

message: I propose this category be moved to Category:Mountains and hills of Ulster, an older (and less confusing) geographical unit.
Lapsed Pacifist 22:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite wrong. Ulster is much more confusing than NI. Also NI fit onto both UK and Ireland categories, Ulster is not part of the UK in entirety. Grinner 09:45, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

text: The term Northern Ireland is clearly defined, refer to an area that is polictically part of the UK, but geographically part of Ireland. Hence this category fits into both "Mountains of Ireland" and "Mountains and Hills of the UK". If you would like to create a larger "Mountains and Hills of Ulster" category then this category could be a subcat of that, whilst remaining also in the UK category. Grinner 12:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Categories for all the Provinces is definately a good idea. I really don't think there is much confusion about what Northern Ireland is , but I shall re-write the note in the category heading in order to make it explicit. Grinner 10:08, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alien Ant Farm

message: Whoever posted that is basically saying that he is Scientologist. How could this be true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fordzii (talk • contribs) 15:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Origin

message: I don't know what the section below is about, no context seems to have been provided, so I've moved the list to here for now. Most of these songs seem to appear on "the CD being sold on tour". Maybe someone more knowledgeable could give this a title, too? Dan 22:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Confirmed Songs for New Record

message: Seeing as there are three columns available in the table, shouldn't there only be one dedicated to the US, with the other two listing the respective UK and AUS positions? I'd edit this myself but am not familiar with formatting tables yet. Could someone look into/edit the table please? Addıct 22:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart positions

message: Alternative rock seems to general. They're definitely either pop-rock or Post-grunge. Arkyopterix 21:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they really are called that everywhere, then it would be best to find any such places which are truly reliable, and cite them here. Prophaniti (talk) 15:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: One of the first lines in the articles talks about the band forming a friendship with Katie and the band Papa Roach.
Who is Katie? Someone's girlfriend? A super fan? What? Could someone tell us why we should care? If she's important to the band, great, just tell us why. I'm looking at these guys for the first time, I don't know the band's history. Katie is Jacoby Shaddix's wife and girlfriend at the time AAF and Papa Roach met. Jacoby Shaddix is the lead singer of Papa Roach. (Otherwise, why would I be here...)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.92.70.107 (talk) 01:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Katie? 

message: alien ant farm had a third album fan-titled "3rd draft" featuring a blue cover with the AAF logo, it never was released because of legal troubles but it was available to fans while they were on tour.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.175.79 (talk) 04:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd draft 
Talk:Passiflora caerulea

message: In the christian symbolism, why are 10 petals (sepals/petals) related to 12 apostles? That makes no sense. Similarly, there is a reference to 5 wounds. I'm familiar with two hand wounds and two feet wounds, where is the fifth? (sorry if I'm sounding ignorant here) Anthony Liekens 22:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 or 12 apostles? 5 wounds? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 15, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-08-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Passiflora caerulea (makro close-up).jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: "In Japan it is called 時計草 (Clock plant) due to having 12 petals" -- I note, with some concern, that there's no citation for that claim. More importantly, the flower has 10 petals, not 12. More accurately, 5 petals alternating with 5 sepals. "Five sepals and petals similar in appearance" is what it says in the description. Ten is also the number of petals in the images. Jusuwa (talk) 03:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed all the unsourced text relating to common names in other languages. Darorcilmir (talk) 08:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of petals
Talk:Ketchup on hot dogs

message: I think this article should also expand onto other foods such as hamburgers. Louis' Lunch in New Haven, CT does not serve ketchup with their burgers for similar reasons as people do not put ketchup on hot dogs: they overpower the taste of the hot dog. --Blue387 09:00, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is a fundamental difference, though.  Certainly there are individual preferences throughout the world not to put ketchup on certain items.  However, ketchup on hot dogs goes beyond the level of isolated areas, and is (at least regionally) quite a strong theme.  This article is not here to tell people whether ketchup is good on things.  It is to document a social phenomena: the taboo of ketchup on a hot dog.  As an aside, some people keep asking why there is an article on this subject, but I can't understand why there is any objection.  I am guessing that they are misunderstaning the point.  Nowhere does this article say you shouldn't put ketchup on a hot dog.  It does, however, document a largely held belief that affects many people.  And no, it's not real important in the grand scheme, but there are movie references, newspaper columns, straight dope articles, and plenty of chicago hot dog vendors ready to yell at you, all regarding this subject.  If you had heard these things, and wanted to understand what was going on, you would not have been ble to go to Wikipedia for the answer before this article was written. --Nuffle 20:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamburgers 

message: I like ketchup on hot dogs, if I was to demand it should I be prepared for a battle? BobbyAFC 07:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will they physically engage me in a fight? 

message: :All relevant portions of this article have been merged with hot dog.  Further details regarding hot dogs in Chicago (that pass WP:V and WP:CITE) should go into the Chicago-style hot dog article. JDoorjam     Talk 00:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, that didn't seem to have lasted very long.  I've reverted to an earlier version that omitted uncited, difficult-to-verify information; please provide a source before replacing it. JDoorjam     Talk 00:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[hot dog]]
Talk:Matthew McConaughey

message: Matthew was not born in Uvalde, TX. He says he was, but he wasn't. He moved there at a fairly young age, and didn't even live there that long.
:What's the source of this claim? Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Then where the heck was he born?? 192.30.174.114 (talk) 00:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: As the topic says, hes acting in sex and the city should be added to the wikipedia page on films where hes known off. 2001:14BB:A0:AAB3:A8E8:239E:F5BB:5ECD (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex and the city 

message: Change this sentence from 5th paragraph in Career section, from:
On July 24, McConaughey played the lawyer Jake Brigance in Joel Schumacher's A Time to Kill premiering that day.[38]
To:
McConaughey played the lawyer Jake Brigance in Joel Schumacher's A Time to Kill which premiere on July 24.[38] 2607:FEA8:3D5E:F500:6C66:2078:79C9:19F9 (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 23:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2023 

message: Surely McConaughey’s mother would have known if she’d been pregnant and given birth a second time?! 154.61.155.100 (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harrelson as a brother 

message: Seriously, are there no moderators? 107.184.11.70 (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington Examiner as a "source"?
Talk:Columba (constellation)

message: According to another wikipedia article, Petrus Plancius created Columba in 1598. (User:Eroica 11:59, wrote in 30 April 2006, apparently – according to a peek into the page history, please use ~~~~ to sign and date the comment, said Rursus declamavi;  21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Petrus Plancius globe, or any replica, may exist somewhere. On that the matter might be resolved. Maybe just wishful thinking... Rursus declamavi;  21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

text: One thing is quite clear! Bayers Uranometria 1603 (Linda Hall version) shows that Columba was part of Canis Maior, as alleged in other places in the wikipedia. OK, so Petrus Plancius inserted it as an asterism, but Royer then presumably separated it into a new constellation? Rursus declamavi;  22:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

text: My name is Carey, and i own a star in this constellation! My boyfriend bought it for me for valentines day! AWWW!
If true, this poor fool Carey [81.145.242.52] got in present some kind of a certificate that her fool of a boyfriend was busted by those charlatans "selling" star names. Otherwise read IAU:s comment on this kind of frauds. Rursus declamavi;  22:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Augustin Royer 

message: I didn't care to report this for the pity of it, but this text I removed from Columba:
:My name is Carey, and i own a star in this constellation! My boyfriend bought it for me for valentines day! AWWW!
If true, this poor fool Carey [81.145.242.52] got in present some kind of a certificate that her fool of a boyfriend was busted by those charlatans "selling" star names. Otherwise read IAU:s comment on this kind of frauds. Rursus declamavi;  22:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Some poor fool vandalism

message: The photograph accompanying the article does not appear to actually show the constellation Columba.40.138.184.12 (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph does not show Columba 
Talk:Hokie Stone

message: Does anyone have a source for this statement (I corrected the spelling of 'Rocovich' in an earlier edit):  
"This legacy inspired John Rocovich, Rector of the VPI&SU Board of Visitors, to make the use of Hokie Stone on all new buildings imperative."
According to http://www.cdcd.vt.edu/Standards_Codes/Design_Guidelines.pdf  (dated 2004), the use is required only on building in the immediate vicinity of the campus Drillfield.
--- Heath 128.173.105.144 22:52, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roosevelt Field (shopping mall)

message: Here is a Newsday article saying the mall is in East Garden City. link -Zimbabweed 16:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Someone recently posted a fun statement on the page that Roosevelt Field is not the largest mall in NY.  Turns out they're right, but only by gross square footage, not leasable square footage.  Both Roosevelt Field and the Palisades Center have qualified largest mall claims. --Meadowbrook 15:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest Mall

message: The Century Roosevelt Cinema opened earlier than '68.  I saw Dr. No there in the early '60s. It had just opened. Longinus876 (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Century Roosevelt Cinema