lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PC

message: ----
What about law firms? P.C.
:)
Done:  Professional corporation 129.173.193.94 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Currently we have no primary topic, or link to the platform known as a PC. How does this help readers, or writers e.g. when they have to follow or fix incoming links to the dab page? For example :New Nintendo 3DS ? Widefox; talk 13:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What's wrong with disambiguating to personal computer? Fleet Command (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Incoming links

message: Hi! I'm not sure if there were any previous discussions on whether something should be widespread enough to be listed on a disambiguation page, but I saw the usage of "P.C." meaning postal code in a 1970s book that seems to have been published in Canada, as well as this study of the health of Germany
I feel that if somebody has decided that "this is how you abbreviate 'postal code'" it's widespread enough to be listed on a disambiguation page.
WhisperToMe (talk) 13:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That somebody once coined it or, with your Chinese tech company instance, there are three disparate primary sources choosing to use this abbreviation, is maybe a lead to find something more substantial but not enough to state that it has significant use, as putting it on a dab page would. If you can find a reference source which lists this as a notably-used acronym that would nail it. I'll note that two of the sources are from non English-speaking countries and the Canadian one seems relatively obscure, possibly self-published. Possibly it's prominent use in a more significant work might suffice but that may also be regarded as OR, I don't know. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

text: I just tried 6 online dictionaries (5 British, one american, FWIW), all of which listed definitions for PC but none of which included "postal code". Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   From this Google search I see the OAG Travel Planner lists "PC Postal Code" so in the airline industry PC can mean postal code. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, that only seeks to reinforce how weak the case is if a similarly obscure primary source usage is all that turns up. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  EDIT: I decided to see if Wikipedia:Disambiguation had guidance and it stated: "In particular, do not include people and other things simply because of their initials, unless those initials have been widely used. John Fitzgerald Kennedy is widely known as JFK and this is discussed in the article, so the initials are appropriately disambiguated; however, Marilyn Monroe was never commonly known as "MM", nor was A. A. Milne known as either "AA" or "AAM". I'm not sure if acronyms count as initials... WhisperToMe (talk) 22:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

text: Hesitate s 164.138.130.165 (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronyms 

message: Pc 2A02:587:497D:8C00:B808:495E:FEF4:A8E2 (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pc
Talk:Austrians

message: While I am happy that the rather stupid discussion about Austrian ethnicity has been settled by just focusing on Austria as a nation in the article, I think it still does not a good job on representing the full diversity of this group: right now the article only talks about German-speaking Austrians and while those make up a majority of the Austrian population, there are multiple indigenous groups in Austria, which do not speak German as their first language, are Austrian citizens and are protected under Austrian constitutional law.
If there is no opposing opinion, I'd like to change the article to reflect those groups as well as immigrant groups with large numbers of naturalized Austrians. --Vierstern (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austrians as a nation should also contain Carinthian Slovenes, Burgenland Croats and other minority groups
Talk:Sir Arthur Pearson, 1st Baronet

message: The Daily Express article says it was sold in 1914. Since this involves a change in its politics, which date is correct? Septentrionalis 20:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. The Max Aitken, 1st Baron Beaverbrook article gives 1915 as the year in which he bought the paper. Let me look into it. BillC 23:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Add: a BBC article  gives 1916. Clearly there is some confusion amongst sources. BillC 23:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I didn't know there was a question till I ran across these two articles. A biography of Lloyd George might explain the sequence of events, but 1916 looks good on your evidence. I'll get back to you. If we can't find an explanation,  how about a genuine, non-disputatious content RfC? Septentrionalis 03:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kutztown University of Pennsylvania

message: Mascots -- While mascots are typically under the athletics heading, I think they stand for more than just sports.  That said, there is a second mascot that should be recognized.  While it is completely unofficial, there used to be two mascots on school vans.  The bear and the chicken.  The chicken should get its due along with an explanation of what it is.  Most students who spent any amount of time on campus had a hard time seeing a clock tower, but there was always the ever present, unblinking gaze of the chicken.  
Firenspeed (talk) 22:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

message: Jeff Bandelin/JohnnyUtah of Newgrounds/Friday Night Funkin' fame graduated in 2000. 
source: https://www.newgrounds.com/wiki/about-newgrounds/staff Toonsip (talk) 08:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Jeff is an animator and game developer Toonsip (talk) 08:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni suggestion
Talk:Rolf Løvland

message: Hi again! The page needs work... but basically I just wanted a placeholder article (I don't think many people are looking anyway?) that we can work on at our leisure. I'll see what I can do in my spare time :-).
As the "controversy": please see http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,4-2005570286,00.html
. Honestly, I believe Lovland & Graham wrote the song, but I'd be curious to see what you think? Feel free to write me on my talk page. Thanks! Danypo 21:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yosip Khnanisho

message: I am unfamiliar with how (if at all) this church formally declares individuals as saints. Please indicate in the article how the subject came to be identified as one. John Carter 19:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint?

message: why this article don't sey that this men is consider a Heretic by the most of the Christin world. where is the neutral pov in this article ? This article must be renewable or deleted   Arthasfleo
:You obviously have no idea what you're talking about, do you?--Rafy talk 17:28, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral POV !!! 

message: Who consecrated him to the episcopate? --Jaques O. Carvalho ☜ 18:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who consecrated him to the episcopate?
Talk:Ryoei Saito

message: he bought also Bal au moulin de la Galette, Montmartre the redirect doesn't consider this --Melaen 18:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: concur. I agree. Also, I think that this article deserves its own writing and all of that.  -- Loukinho (talk) 07:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Disney's Animal Kingdom

message: And what about the Magic of Disney's Animal Kingdom TV show on the National Geographic channel?
Why no mention?
Just curious. 2600:8800:785:2A00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 04:28, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV series 
Talk:French citizenship and identity

message: Under French law passed after the Vichy regime, it is forbidden to categorize people according to their ethnic origins
This sentence is untrue. France doesn't break statistics by ethnicity since the start of the Third Republic. It is not connected to Vichy. Theorically, nothing bans France to do it, it is just not a custom, so that no differences are made between the different constitutives of the French people, to follow the French idea of identity as it is defined today.
Cause france isn´t a superficially oriented, physic appearence obsessed country like .,..
Hmmm. Unless anyone brings evidence to the contrary please edi this bit then:-)--Cassius80 22:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why French don't break statistics by ethnicity? 

message: If this page is to be kept (even though some have said it was a POV-fork), shouldn't it be renamed to French nationality law for Wikipedia coherence (as in British nationality law, etc.) ? Lapaz 17:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Censor

message: At the moment there's not enough content to justify separate dab pages for the two terms, so I elected to merge them. They may need to be split off at some point. --Muchness 20:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Censor (disambiguation) vs. Censorship (disambiguation)

message: I'm not sure how NPOV functions on disambiguation pages, but the description of censorship as "the polar opposite of freedom" seems odd and out of place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahewa (talk • contribs) 21:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of Censorship 

message: Which is the best synonym of bowdlerize?
Bowdlerize derives from Thomas Bowdler, an English editor, and means "to expurgate by omitting or modifying parts considered vulgar".
Merriam Webster's word game: Eponym quiz
--87.212.1.81 (talk) 18:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb: synonym
Talk:Film studies

message: I'd suggest that film studies be separated from film theory, to which it currently redirects.
Film studies is an academic discipline that may include theory, but it may also be oriented to criticism or history. --Jeremy Butler 20:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hi my name is Joe K I am a student at Georgetown University part of the Wikiproject United States Public Policy and over the next two months I am going to be adding to this article so heads up and I would really appreciate the communities help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joko123nm (talk • contribs) 14:47, October 7, 2010
This is a terrible article. It needs to be completely rewritten by someone who knows something about the subject. The list of film-makers and critics is a complete waste of space.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.225.89 (talk) 13:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Class project

message: We are currently working on THE TRANSLATION into Spanish of this article. Translation work will be ready by the end of May 2013. For more information see Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/Universitat_Jaume_I_-_E-translating PLEASE, DO NOT TRANSLATE THIS PAGE. IF YOU DO SO, PLEASE INFORM US AT Mcptrad -- Mcptrad (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation Class Project
File talk:Rzeczpospolita.png

message: Poland and Lithuania never had Tobago and Gambia!
I'm from Poland and I never heared about it.
From which source is this information?
Check this http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafika:Rzeczpospolita_1600.png
Someone must correct it...
Przemysław Bolisęga
------
Answer: This map is accurate about Tobago and Gambia. Settlers from Courland, therefore Commonwealth citizens, made colonies at Tobago and Gambia. Jakob von Kettler, a citizen of the Polish fief of Courland, organized all this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Kettler
So, these were German-speakers acting independently without the financial support of the Polish State, but they were citizens from the Commonwealth of Poland and Lithuania. Maybe its because they were ethnic Germans from modern Latvia that Poles don't hear about it much. That's a pity.
I'm not sure about one thing on this map: The Commonwealth legally had Livonia at the same time as Smolensk between 1619 (when it gained Smolensk and east-central Ukraine in Truce of Deulino) and 1629 (when it de facto lost northern or 'rump' Livonia to Sweden). So the "greatest extent" title of this map is only valid for 10 years of history, during which time the colonization of Tobago and Gambia hadn't begun. We should clearly mark the external border of the Commonwealth with a red line, and put "1619-1629" in the title. Tobago and Gambia is still an interesting note that we can have on the side.
---
KASSA / KOSICE was NEVER part of the Ottoman Empire.  Please check your historical records more carefully.  That area (northern Abauj), like Transylvania, was 'free Hungary' or part of the Habsburg Empire, not the Ottoman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.225.211 (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Religious views on suicide

message: I know there are 3 sources copy/pasted from another page but it's still wrong. (a) Socrates isn't antiquity and (b) he was just philosophical, not relaxed. — LlywelynII 19:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Relaxed view"

message: Shahids according to most Islamic views would go to heaven, whether or not you view 9/11 as righteous(if you are a muslim), surely there are situatiins wherein suicide bombing is permissible. 2001:448A:1082:5550:91BA:2663:755A:DD13 (talk) 06:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam
Talk:The Tears of a Clown

message: Shown on the chart??  This is an American song and it was released in the US in 1967. It's silly and misleading that only the UK date (re-release date) is given on the chart.  Moncrief 16:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is only the UK release date

message: Added Trivia section about Bassoon, although cannot cite whether it is the only number one hit or only song for that matter to actually have a bassoon. Presumably, the Funk Brothers either played or contracted the part. Group29 15:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bassoon
Talk:Yellowstone Public Radio

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a medical school in Pakistan is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the medical school. - Dravecky (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Cornwall, Vermont

message: I removed this text from the site wich was under the "cornwall today" heading because it's copied verbatim from this site. It needs to be cleaned up or have citations added, though I'd encourage it to stay in if it's not a copyvio.
The town was established in 1784 and has had a population of about 1000 for the past 200 years. Until recently it has been an agricultural community and was once famous for its Merino sheep, Morgan horses, and apple orchards. Today there are only a few working farms left. There are a number of small enterprises and home businesses, but most residents work in Middlebury or other surrounding towns. Many seniors have been moving to Cornwall for their retirement.
Cornwall has relatively few town organizations. The school district operates one elementary school, Bingham Memorial. Secondary students are transported to Middlebury Union High School. There is an active Congregational Church, a small public library, and a volunteer fire department. The town is managed by an elected selectboard. However, most routine business is handled by the Town Clerk and Town Treasurer who hold regular office hours at the Town Hall. There are no retail stores currently operating in town and most residents do their shopping and obtain services in nearby Middlebury. 
Jessamyn 20:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: data from other site?
Wikipedia talk:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 January 19

message: For the record I wish Jimbo didn't issue edicts like this and I think the debate should have been allowed to run its course. - Haukur 21:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, his blanking of valid concerns and alternative solutions was a poor show too. Thanks/wangi 21:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I did not intend to blank them.  I'm in the process now of moving them to the appropriate place: the category talk page.--Jimbo Wales 21:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but if you didn't intend blanking them then... then... why these two edits: , ? Over 50mins for a cut'n'paste? Would you like to address some of the concerns and alternatives raised? Thanks/wangi 21:18, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry, didn't realize this had already been discussed here when I made the edit just now. - Haukur 21:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On the closing of the [[:Category:Living people]] debate
Talk:KRZN

message: This station is advertised as "active rock" but comparing playlists from the station to the active rock charts there are glaring omissions of some of today's top active rock bands. This station will play songs from what are considered hard rock bands but only selected, tamer songs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigunmt (talk • contribs) 14:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Troll gas field

message: The article Troll oil platform discusses the platform Troll A without even mentioning what platform in the Troll field it is discussing. I think that, instead of rewriting it and adding new links everywhere, it should be integrated into this article. This article is a stub, but atleast it is linked to on oil production related pages, unlike the platform page. Joffeloff
:Disagree. The structure is different from the oil field. The field itself warrants a larger article. -- Egil 15:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Lee Brown Coye

message: the original editor of this page  has asserted permission to use this article which was originally published elsewhere.  The original can be seen in the Google cache, authored by Tammra Rayfield, 2002.
This is not correct!  I submitted that information to the askart.com website with the permission of Tammra Rayfield. Bill Drew 18:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Namık Kemal

message: This article was moved from Wiktionary, and it needs cleanup. The edit history was as follows:

19. jan 2006 kl.21:12 Dangherous ({{Move to Wikipedia}})
18. jan 2006 kl.21:08 85.102.101.109

Jon Harald Søby 21:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article history

message: * I suggest we keep the shorter name of him since he's known as Namık Kemal in his homeland, Turkey. --Bahar (Spring in Turkish) ✍ 15:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Not all the article was taken from the Britannica, might be possible to clean up the copyrighted part keeping the clean ones instead of deleting the whole article.--Kimdime (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the revisions that aren't violations now. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 13:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on copyvio 

message: Is there a citation for Namik Kemal's influence on Ataturk? I've been looking for this for a while...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.64.109.109 (talk) 22:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for influence on Ataturk?
Talk:Ntare VI of Ankole

message: His kingdom is missing from the name; see naming conventions on royals. Gryffindor 21:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ntare VI → Ntare VI of Ankole – {King of Ankole, article is missing his kingdom.} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
===Discussion===
:Add any additional comments
*Comment This move follows naming conventions (monarchical titles) and so should not be controversial. I am therefore not creating a voting section; if anyone objects to the move please feel free to create one! --Lox (t,c) 17:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add any additional comments
*Comment This move follows naming conventions (monarchical titles) and so should not be controversial. I am therefore not creating a voting section; if anyone objects to the move please feel free to create one! --Lox (t,c) 17:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Template talk:Argentine universities

message: Why this template is not for dead universities? User:Ejrrjs  says What? 21:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: The names in these templates should be in English (as per WP:UE). Is it OK if I change the names and rename as needed? BTW I already spotted one double redirect...  —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names?
Talk:Savonia University of Applied Sciences

message: Following finnish ARENE's (national board of ammattikorkeakoulu-rectors) outline recommendation dated December 2005, as of January 1st 2006 the whole Finnish Ammattikorkeakoulu -regime unified their international names from several different versions to new "University of Applied Sciences". 
This follows eg. german Fachhochschules (similar to which, the Bologna Process has enabled Masters degree -programmes in addition to Bachelors - in Finland the process has been a bit slower though), which already used this name in their international operations.  * Ras 22:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ministry of Education still prefers the term polytechnic, though. --Mikko Silvonen 14:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But currently, the term polytechnic is not in any use, at least as far as I have seen.193.166.53.253 (talk) 14:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title change
Talk:Guana River State Park

message: According to [www.wildernet.com/pages/area.cfm?areaid=FLSPGu www.wildernet.com/pages/area.cfm?areaid=FLSPGu,] this is no longer a state park. Do we need to delete it and its entry on the List, etc.
:The better way would be to edit this article to reflect the property's new status, and move the article to the appropriate name. -- Donald Albury 15:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you insert that link again?  I cut and pasted it and just got an error message. Unschool (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Try this, it should work better. -Ebyabe (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You know, I looked at that site, and didn't really believe it.  So I went to the State Parks site and yep, there's no Guana there.  My suggestion is that all relevant material—including the history of what happened—be placed in the GTMNERR article, and then that this article be turned into a redirect. Unschool (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no longer a state park