Talk:2002 Metzer attack

message: This page was created as Sirhan Sirhan (militant), and moved to a page on the crime he committed as per usual practice with criminals known for a single event.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: talk from old page

message: Why is the Palestinian Sirham Sirham responsible for killing 5 settlers labled as "terrorist" and the attack a "massacre"?
If there are no objections "terrorist" should be changed to "militiant" or "activist" and the conclusion drawing "massacre" to "battle" or something similar.
- Greenguy
:Here's why.  Because both are inherently POV.  To ignore the fact that this guy killed 5 innocent civilians (Don't tell me that people building houses are threats to Palestine; its absurd) by calling him simply a "militant" and certainly an "activist" (unless you mean actively pursuing murder as a reasonable course of political action with no moral justification, which, if you make clear, I'm ok with) you degrade what he did and insinuate in some way that it isn't vile and despicable.  The same goes toward "battle" because that implies that say, the people he killed were armed, or were commiting acts of violence which they were not (see Mother and her two CHILDREN ages FOUR and FIVE).  Both suggested changes are completely unacceptable.--TheGrza 08:20, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
" Because both are inherently POV. " Militiant or activist is the term that the mainstream media uses. There are countless sources. Terrorist is a Israeli or Zionist POV.
"Don't tell me that people building houses are threats to Palestine; its absurd) "
It doesn't matter what they were doing specifically that is not why they died. What they were doing doesn't change the context of the act which happen as part of the overall Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And that has to be respected to maintain a neutral POV. If every murder of Palestinian children and unarmed civilians by IDF is labeled a massacre there would be a massive protest and cry of anti-semitism. Not to mention the significance of the word is decreased.
Greenguy
This wasn't every act of aggression, this was the slaughter of 5 unarmed people, including two children.  "Militant" has been used, but almost never for those who kill innocents.  See the Iraq War coverage; Militants attack U.S. Troops, Terrorists blow up innocent people even though they are the same people.  Sirhan Sirhan's attack was a purely terroristic one, designed to strike fear into the hearts of settlers, making him a terrorist by his own motives.--TheGrza 01:03, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
Try the Google test. Terrorist attack civilians brings up a page of rightwing, zionist and Israeli sites. "Militant Attack Civilians" Brings up a much broader range of American, British and world sources.
"Militant Sirhan Sirhan kibbutz" as well brings up more diverse sources than "Terrorist Sirhan Sirhan kibbutz" which returns Pro-zionist and Israeli sites.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22sirhan+sirhan%22+kibbutz+militant&btnG=Search
Finally, Sirhan Sirhan was a militant of Al-Aqsa Martyr's Brigades, a militant group recognized as a terrorist group only by Israel at the time. Not to mention the US recognized it as a terrorist group  only later when they began attacking Israeli cities in response to Israel's occupation.
--Greenguy 01:19, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Terrorist", "Massacre" Is POV 

message: I realize the large problems with (militant) as the sub name to differentiate... feel free to change it but I didn't know what was better and I felt this deserved to be separated and not just shoved at the bottom of the other article. gren 05:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MOve

message: Here's the history for GFDL:
*(cur) (last)  05:14, 22 September 2005 Aaron Brenneman (Copy edit, NPOV changes) 
*(cur) (last)  05:13, 22 September 2005 Jwissick m (Do not remove the db. This page is redundent) 
*(cur) (last)  05:09, 22 September 2005 207.195.255.158 
*(cur) (last)  05:06, 22 September 2005 Jwissick 
*(cur) (last)  05:03, 22 September 2005 207.195.255.158
(unsigned edit by brenneman(t)(c))
===Messy===
Which I now realize was a cut and paste from this, or perhaps just a page move without moving the talk page or something else I don't see.
Here's a short answer: quit stuffing around!  Leave the page here, argue the content here, and quit with the  tags which reference the totally irrelevant Sirhan Sirhan. Grrr. brenneman(t)(c) 05:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut and paste move from [[Sirhan Sirhan (terrorist)]] 

message: Which I now realize was a cut and paste from this, or perhaps just a page move without moving the talk page or something else I don't see.
Here's a short answer: quit stuffing around!  Leave the page here, argue the content here, and quit with the  tags which reference the totally irrelevant Sirhan Sirhan. Grrr. brenneman(t)(c) 05:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Messy

message: Who called him as such WP:RS need or else this stub is WP:OR and the word should be removedRaveenS 19:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal blogs are not WP:RS it is not correct to use such referencesRaveenS 16:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The referenced blog says ->Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jihad Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.) Clearly not a WP:RS But any way moving on 18:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged

message: As of 23:36, 3 July 2006, IP 69.143.253.186 inserted the word Christian in front of "Palestinian …" , thereby labeling Sirhan Sirhan as a Christian. Though 69.143.253.186 provided no source for this claim, it remained uncontested until now. Respecting AGF I suspect that 69.143.253.186 simply confused this Sirhan Sirhan with the RFK assassin Sirhan Sirhan, though the latter was only born as a Christian but later changed his religion several times.
The CBS article (see external link 1) clearly states: “The Sirhans in the Tulkarem refugee camp are Muslims.”  Therefore I have replaced the word Christian by Muslim. --Túrelio 09:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced claim of Christian affiliation

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2002 Metzer attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406040957/http://articles.cnn.com/2002-11-11/world/mideast_1_kibbutz-metzer-fatah-and-hamas-senior-israeli-military-officials?_s=PM%3AWORLD to http://articles.cnn.com/2002-11-11/world/mideast_1_kibbutz-metzer-fatah-and-hamas-senior-israeli-military-officials?_s=PM%3AWORLD
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403024612/http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-%2BObstacle%2Bto%2BPeace/Palestinian%2Bterror%2Bsince%2B2000/Victims%2Bof%2BPalestinian%2BViolence%2Band%2BTerrorism%2Bsinc.htm to http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-%2BObstacle%2Bto%2BPeace/Palestinian%2Bterror%2Bsince%2B2000/Victims%2Bof%2BPalestinian%2BViolence%2Band%2BTerrorism%2Bsinc.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified