Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Timeline Tracer

message: WikiProject True Origins WP:TORIG is now WikiProject Timeline Tracer WP:TIMETRACE  also WP:TIMET. This follows many opinions that the previous name of the project could confuse or provide negative feelings in some users. I hope the new name serves well Daoken 02:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:TORIG  is now WP:TIMETRACE (also WP:TIMET) 

message: Please remember to change, in the page where you have your userboxes,  for  or  (smaller). I have changed the template  for it looks and act as  but safest is to change it editing your userbox page Daoken 11:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To all members 

message: This is a very useful project I believe, there are soooo many articles wrong but WRONG ! Well, for now I registered as Friend, later may be like a Participant. In my new talk page there is a bit of humor for TimeTracers Vanished user 22:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice project!  

message: I was rolling of laugh, like your styleTopTopView 23:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. That's superb! Pedro |  Chat   09:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is just lol and lol Daoken 11:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonderful! I was looking for the oxygen mask and under-the-seat-life-preserver instructions..!  Very funny! Dreadstar † 17:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I add my laugh there ℒibrarian2 20:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Make my best, keep tuned for new onesVanished user 07:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanished User your user pages are hilarious 

message: I'm just curious why the original project was not moved to here, instead of newly creating this and copying the old info into it? Moving a page preserves the history, the talk page conversations, and talk page history. I'd think you would want to preserve all that. Regardless, the new name is much nicer! Ariel♥Gold 09:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't know how to do it, asked for help to some sysop but never got response so I assumed that in spite of that there is lots of kindness helping with small things and so, when it was about something more complex, there was an unspoken policy of "work your things out, that is the best way to learn", which was fine. I also didn't want to hang on to someone always asking for help, so I made the best I could with my limited knowledge of Wiki. I hope that there is no problem with not having moved all, I just set up the new and redirected the old. Daoken 11:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be no problem, the history in the redirect page still exists for licensing purposes, which is the key factor.  We can always have an administrator move or merge the old history here if it's important.  Good job!  Dreadstar † 17:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious

message: WikiProject Timeline Tracer has been greatly enhanced with Guidelines and Strategy as well as many alternatives which will make your editions more easy to target, easier to tag or comment and much more. Please go to WP:TIMETRACE, give a look in the new tools and get busy helping articles. Remember that this WikiProject is helping the backbone (beyond content) of all articles , Reliable Sources and Verification. Thank you for participating Daoken 11:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I must say that I am impressed. Great job. ℒibrarian2 16:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's beautiful! Dreadstar † 17:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:TIMETRACE has been enhanced, give a look 

message: I'd prefer to avoid large banners in cases where the article is 99% ok. Can I suggest a tag for use within the text, similar to ? The text could, in fact, be identical to : the difference would be the category/categories added. Good idea? Bad idea? Jakew 19:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very good idea, I created  and will post it at the Resources page and Guidelines Good call! Vanished user 08:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A  good thing to add to resources Daoken 09:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {{tl|timefact}}

message: Hello all! I thought I would let you know that the reliable sources guideline was recently re-written. You may wish to review it, and possible revise the Wikipedia:WikiProject Timeline Tracer/Reliable sources. I would actually suggest simply redirecting that page to the current WP:RS, since copying and pasting part of Wikipedia into another has its own issues (see Wikipedia:Verbatim copying). Perhaps instead of the RS section here, you could make it a supplement to historical references that talks about issues that editors may run into when dealing with older historic sources, giving tips on how to find valid, verifiable sources. Just a suggestion! Cheers, Ariel♥Gold 09:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reasonable point, I changed WP:TIMETRS, if anyone disagrees please revert, but I think is better now and will not need to be updated if WP changes the RS criteria Vanished user 10:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable Sources 

message: Please review some changes to WP:TIMETGD related to how to use the tags. Daoken 09:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New guidelines 

message: I think that now the purpose is more clear. I will use the new guidelines as described in the message received at my talk page JennyLen☤ 16:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More clear 

message: At WP:UPDATE we have recently reviewed all guidelines at the light of some namespace policies. As it seems that WP:TIMET may be suffering from similar "discomfort" , I will WP:BOLD and take care of actualizing all tags and categories. This is for sparing you the trouble. If Daoken or anyone thinks I acted wrongly please let me know and revert the changes, I am doing this in the best intention ℒibrarian2 05:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, that was a fine and timely work. Well done! Daoken 08:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags and categories 

message: Should not the relation to Wikipedia:WikiProject Time be established and outlined on the project page? __meco 16:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to propose in this talk page what do you want to include Daoken 16:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That that project be mentioned as a related project? __meco 20:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added you to the cooperation banner, is that ok? ℒibrarian2 19:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's appropriate for reasons of synergy effect if for no other. __meco 19:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Time 

message: This is an interesting WikiProject. I agree that many articles are lamentable at giving historical context, let alone referencing it. Have you considered working with Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science? Carcharoth 12:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a good idea JennyLen☤ 19:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Daoken 18:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting 

message: I recommend to try this bot, it may help Daoken 05:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot 

message: This article about a drug and a phenomenon that is currently breaking in the US news media already has some timeline issues which needs to be monitored if not addressed directly. I have already given heads-up to WikiProject Update Watch about this. __meco 14:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Following the discussion at the article's talk page I splitted the timelines into a new article See Jenkem media surge (2007)‎ Daoken 12:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although this has currently been undone, that is not the end of this. I hope members of this project will keep assisting in the development of the Jenkem article. __meco 17:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jenkem]] 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Adam Cuerden talk 09:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the notification. The necessary comments are at the TfD page. Once again, and as said previously at User_talk:Adam_Cuerden#POV wars please do not stalk or target this project with your animosity against editors who happen to be WP:TIMET members but who contradict you on their own  and not as representatives of this project. This type of behavior is perhaps a sequel of the pending arbitration Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Matthew_Hoffman/Proposed_decision#... RfA possible too, please refrain from such behavior. Daoken 09:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Timefact}}]] 

message: Daoken 10:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminder 

message: An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ?  " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - , member of WikiProject Council.  14:39, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A discussion 

message: On the list of countries in chronological order of achieving statehood, the date given for the founding of Japan, 660 BC, is the traditional date derived from Japanese legend. But in actual historical fact, the Yamato state which would evolve into a unified, coordinated country did not emerge until many centuries later. Whether that date is 538, when the capital was founded at Asuka, 710 when the capital was founded at Nara, or earlier in the Kofun period, is certainly a matter of debate. Many scholars of Japanese history would likely argue that there was no country of "Japan" until 1868. But in any case, whatever date we may choose, it's certainly not 660 BC, as that's simply completely historically inaccurate, going back to a period during the Jomon period before there was any organized government or society of any kind beyond small chiefdoms, extended family clan villages, or something to that effect. Please see discussion at Talk:List of countries in chronological order of achieving statehood, and respond there, not here. Thank you. LordAmeth (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding of Japan 

message: This project, given its scope, will no longer be limited to participation by members but instead will be open to participation. We encourage all Wikipedia editors to review the Guidelines and to add historical and chronolical accuracy tags to articles needing these. Thank you Daoken 16:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open participation 

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  02:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: Hi, I was wondering if anyone can help expand and clean-up this article. Thanks -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed 

message: Your WP:Keep It Simple label,  is in danger of being deleted. See (Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 6#Template:User_label.) If you still want it, you may wish to move it to project space, perhaps a redirect page Template:Label WPTimetracer or Template:Label WikiProject Timetracer by placing  above the redirect. Also see  for technical details. Feel free to review my planning page, User:PC-XT/KIS, and talk there if you have questions. PC-XT (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:KIS]] label 

message: Hi. We're having a discussion on the fate of Horrible Histories TV show at: Horrible Histories (2009 TV series)#Moving on. As a relevant Wikiproject, we would greatly appreciate it if you would voice your opinion on the talk page, or to have a crack at editing and improving it. Thankyou for your time. :)--Coin945 (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible Histories 

message: Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: 
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 12:34, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaflet for Wikiproject Timeline Tracer at Wikimania 2014 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out!