Talk:Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development

message: I have converted the EU Framework Program for Research and Technological Development article into a redirect page that leads here as the article contained on this pagecorresponds to all Wikipedia standards whereas the other one is simply redundant and "unencyclopaedic". RedZebra 16:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request

message: The fiware page redirects here and there is NO information on fiware here!!!
Please make a fiware page.
see https://fiware.org
https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/50615/paper0728.pdf
I want to know if FI in fiware stands for Federated IoT.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 20:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: FIware

message: I started removing the over-promotional language,  removing PR jargon to make a more effective discussion. This in an encyclopedia, not a promotional web site. There's still some more to go. I added subheads, but references are needed for the criticism section, and a few key terms need internal links. DGG (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: copyedit for conciseness

message: Apart from being quite sceptical of Muldur et al.'s claims of returns on investment (I doubt the reliabilitiy of a prediction of returns on a current, i.e. 2006, research investment 25-30 years in the future, especially as it pertains to overall impact on GDP growth), I believe this article still needs revision.
Passages such as:
:"There are also the intangible result of providing incentive to face the intrinsic complexity of international collaborations."
::("Sounds like it's good, why? Because we say so." And btw, what exactly is the point of this claim?)
"Changes triggered by research policy directly affect people and enterprises, which experience broader horizons and experience the advantages of international collaboration."
(Well the fact that changes caused by research effect people and businesses is hardly surprising... Apart from that: the "advantages" of collaboration could actually be downsides/failures, if the collaboration goes awry?)
"Diversity introduces additional costs, but it facilitates addressing competitors in an even more diverse world."
(How exactly does diversity facilitate addressing competitors? And again what exactly is the point of this passage? And what does it actually mean?)
"This complements the institutional activities of the EU, building a community united in diversity capable of facing the challenges of a globalized world."
(Well hurrah, bring out your blue & star banners... Why is this here? It sounds more like a promotional slogan than an encyclopedic entry)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mojowiha (talk • contribs) 23:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like government-speak justifying the political correctness of the grants favoring collaboration across countries that speak diferent languages and have different cultures. This is probably worth mentioning, because indeed diversity had both advantages and challenges. But needs to in plain English and not obfuscated promotion. W Nowicki (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a bit congratulary? 

message: Horizon 2020 is simply the 8th instalment of the Framework programmes and should briefly be covered there. No need for independent articles for each 7 year version of this programme, just cover the changes in a single paragraph in the overall article. Randykitty (talk) 13:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *Rather than suggest that another user go to the effort of analysing and merging the content from an article that you've just been looking over, perhaps you could have actually merged the content yourself? I don't know how that action was otherwise supposed to help the general reader of Wikipedia, when it essentially replaced an article's worth of reliably sourced content with eight lines of trash. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

text: * Or, possibly better, update the summary here and just link with  to Horizon 2020 ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Horizon 2020]] - Done - Questioned 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keeping Emulation Environments Portable. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Keeping Emulation Environments Portable" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: FROG (project) redirects here, but no project by that name is mentioned in this article or in any other article (according to the article previously at that location, "FROG" stands for "Fun Robotic Outdoor Guide"). Would some discussion of that project be a useful addition to this article, or should the redirect be deleted? (Pinging Randykitty who redirected it here.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[FROG (project)]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect FROG (project). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 26#FROG (project) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "FROG (project)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect CyberEmotions has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Belbury (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:CyberEmotions]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]