Talk:The Creeping Terror

message: Can some one explain to others what is MST3K. Not everone is familiar with this. Is it a radio station, TV channel etc? If so a date or year when such mention was made would also be useful.
Conce 03:26, 2005 August 14 (UTC)
:I added a brief description to the MST3K reference a while back, but I'll also add a date for Creeping Terror's appearance shortly. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:51, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MST3K?

message: The description of the monster is currently incredibly subjective, bordering on whimsy. We could use both a more objective description and perhaps quotes from published reviews for the more subjective elements, in an effort provide a neutral point of view and avoid original research. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: … unlike the monster. ☺ ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:00, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm afraid the above tale is exactly that — just a tale — unless backed up by a reliable source, preferably in print. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Whoever is posting this information without signing the posts continues to ignore the Wikipedia's "no original research" policy cited above. Personal affidavits and viewer opinions, however common they may be, are NOT published data. No amount of talk-page explanation will change this. Wikipedia is not a blog. If this person is "collecting trivia on this film", however, they should be in a good position to provide some published references which could be used as sources. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

text: This is quite troubling, as Wikipedia does not consider unpublished first-person accounts to be reliable sources. We may have to change this article to reflect only the contradictory published information, pointing out that there are no reliable accounts. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 09:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monster description 

message: hi, i dont know anything about this film but tried to do a cleanup. i removed the following text as part of the cleanup as it was either irrelevant as far as i could tell, or not verifiable. i left the cleanup tag as it could still be improved a lot. rgs, Catherine breillat 16:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The IMDB seems to list the film at 75 minutes; perhaps the 85 minute figure was a typo. It would be interesting to know if there was a "tv cut", and how it differed from the original. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It seems that the only place that lists an 85 minute runtime is Wikipedia itself, or mirrors of Wikipedia. Ordinarily I would just change this, but Gaira seems to know a fair amount about the film. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: ok me again, i tidied it more, enough that i could remove the cleanup tag. BUT the article states the writer as Allan Silliphant, which according to imdb is a pseudonym of Al Silliman Jr.
who directed The Stewardesses (1969) as per the article. unfortunately imdb does not list him as writer of The Creeping Terror: the 2 writers are Arthur Ross and Robert Silliphant. is somebody confusing Robert Silliphant and Allan Silliphant, who are different people according to imdb? or is imdb wrong? so i added a factual accuracy dispute tag. Catherine breillat 22:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Allan Silliphant

message: A section on a couple of unofficial "sequels", two student films, that do not meet the Wikipedia guidelines for notability in film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brymc210 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed "Sequels"

message: It's not necessarily suitable for an encyclopedic entry. But, come on. There's no way the director didn't have some form of vorarephilia...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.17.151.47 (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fetish Material