lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nuestra Señora de la Concepción

message: I have put this explanation separately from Spitfire and HMS_Spitfire because the euphemism needs explaining, but even now some people object to unexpectedly coming actoss the word "shit". Anthony Appleyard 05:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just confused as to what this has to do with 'Spitfire?' 75.75.110.235 15:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spitfire 

message: I do not think that the present title is very apt. I believe, it should be reverted back to Cacafuego. Or, perhaps, Cagafuego, for that matter. Any objections? --Dart evader 16:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert the page move? 

message: Cacafuego was a rather common name for Spanish ships, and was applied to dozens of various vessels.  Given this, the Master and Commander reference in this article seems extraordinarily tenuous. Fell Gleamingtalk 11:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  O'Brian Reference 

message: The second paragraph of this section twice refers to the Cacafuego. This should be changed to Cagafuego.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oregontsunami (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disposition of its Treasure 

message: Some user included wrong info about a totally different ship. The first ship captured by Drake was an average-big ship for the 1570s with 150 tons, while the second one used in the "Galeon de Manila" route was one of the biggest ships in the world at 1638 with 2,000 tons. Beside that and the fact the first was captured by Drake we have the fact that close to 60 years! passed from one event and the other. No ship in spanish fleets during XVI and XVII centuries had so long live, in fact not a single one is documented with 30 years for the Atlantic route, e.g.
The Nuestra Señora de la Concepción Galleon (1638) have been referenced dozen of times with its 2000 tons, for example:
- Fish, Shirley. The Manila-Acapulco Galleons: The Treasure Ships of the Pacific, AuthorHouse, 2011, p 673.
- Giraldez, Arturo. The Age of Trade: The Manila Galleons and Dawn of Global Economy, Rowman & Littlefield, 2015, p.159
31.222.101.67 (talk) 11:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I deleted the section about a totally different ship
Talk:Armand van Helden

message: Question:
Is there any web-site listing the Dates of worldwide DJ-Sets? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.162.147.207 (talk) 17:17, April 17, 2006 (UTC)
He uses a set with a scratcher on it.
This article doesn't even mention his #1 breakaway success Funk Phenomenon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.32.247.65 (talk) 04:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates DJ-Sets 

message: This single should be edited to include that it features the rapper Common  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.98.147.250 (talk) 05:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full moonm 

message: Ive read a couple of times the avh has talked openly bout time spent as a dealer in NewYork. Anyone have sources for this. It would be appropriate for the section bout his personal life. Eleutherius (talk) 12:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's proof that he was a dealer, then it's absolutely fair to include that, despite any debate if it puts one into a bad light or not. It's not bias if Wikipedia just states he was a dealer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.94.242.93 (talk) 19:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life as a dealer? 

message: The lead has "Armand van Helden" (like some other van names) but elsewhere in the article (and title) it's capitalised to Van. Which is right? --xensyriaT 15:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Same question :( -- BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 11:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  You know he's an American, right? Dutch language rules don't apply. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm only pointing out the correct rule in Dutch. Yes, Americans with Dutch names have prefixes in their last names capitalized in line with English practice. The same is true of Armand on his social media pages and even the Dutch Wikipedia article about him capitalizes the prefix in his last name. Maybe you can change all instances of "van Helden" to "Van Helden" (including the title) to reflect that? 2001:1C00:1E31:7800:EC21:91E5:8D0E:5DA9 (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van or van 

message: Article describes him as DJ multiple times, but the biography is almost entirely about his career as a remixer and producer. There's no mention of notable residencies or inclusions on best-DJ lists.  Pathologix (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  DJ or prodicer
Template talk:Comp-sci-stub

message: This one is barely readable at 32 pixels, I think the old one was better.SoothingR 09:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This kind of picture is the right kind of idea. It is much better at evoking "computer science" than a person or a picture of a computer. However, the image itself is hard to read because it was not meant for this scale. We need something similar, with boxes and arrows, but designed for icon size. PhS 22:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New image

message: User:Zawersh proposed a new stub icon over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science. This icon keeps the "boxes and lines" style of the previous one, but looks much better at small scales. The reaction on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science was generally positive, so I have replaced the old icon with the one supplied by User:Zawersh. --Allan McInnes (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New stub icon
Category talk:England geography stubs

message: This pages says ceremonial counties, but the map certainly looks like administrative ones.  For example, this would have implications for Tyne and Weir stubs -- under the former scheme they'd go into Northumberland or Yorkshire, according to the map, they'd go into "England".  Alai 06:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Tyne and Wear is a ceremonial county - at least according to the Tyne and Wear page (Tesside isn't, though, which could be the reason for the confusion - either that or you're getting confised with the historical counties). The split is definitely ceremonial counties (as per Wikipedia's guidelines). And the map was based on the map on the Ceremonial counties of England page. Grutness...wha? 08:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I think I'm now confused as to what I was confused about.  Certainly I'd no idea that T&W had a lord lieutenant, and it appears it certaingly does, so I shall slink off in disgrace...  Alai 09:42, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

text: It surprised me too - as did Bristol. Then again I tend to think in the "old" (pre-74) counties. Grutness...wha? 03:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ceremonial or admin. counties?
Talk:Novell

message: Instead of noting the poor technology and financial decisions of Ray Noorda, Eric Schmidt, et al; all I read is 'poor Novell everyone is conspiring against them'. My documented experience with CTP in 1999 is different than reported here. Yes, it does read like it was copied from the Novell corporate history page. 
Shjacks45 (talk) 02:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This wiki is biased and inaccurate 

message: Hi! I have started to clean up the early Novell history a bit, but there's much more to do as a lot is mixed up and omitted in there at present. Since I don't have the time for it right now, I would like to at least point to a source which could be used to straighten some of the facts: 
:--Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Novell history confusion 
Talk:Medeski Martin & Wood

message: Anyone have the exact date and/or a source for this?  I'm sure it was before the October 1995 Phish shows with MMW, but I couldn't find any other details.  Was it in the Phish newsletter, or just a random interview? N2f 06:53, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trey's "[makes me] drive too fast" quote 

message: this article seems to be missing an album:
http://www.mmw.net/music.jsp
--124.176.59.236 12:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing album? 

message: I was at a show this past Thursday night (Thanksgiving '06), a trio of Berklee grads called O'Neil-Armstrong. After the show I was talking to the drummer, Jeff Armstrong, and he was telling me about this Bob Moses show when we somehow ended up on the subject of Medeski Martin & Wood. Then he tells me that Bob Moses is the one who introduced the three. Supposedly, Moses was something of a mentor for Medeski. John, meanwhile, had been playing with some other musicians when Bob said something like, "hey, these guys are good, but I have these other two guys that would fit with you way better."
No idea how much of this is true, but he was a Berklee grad, had a sick jazz-funk trio, and seemed very sure of it. If anyone finds any information regarding this, let us know. Kevglynn 14:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Moses introduced the band? 
Talk:Historical astronomy

message: This isn't linked from anywhere, could be expanded and integrated. Enochlau 06:29, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's on the border, but still a stub (nearly 17 years later, no less). Praemonitus (talk) 23:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Chung Kuo (novel series)

message: I must say I'm not happy with this information on Devore being present in the article, it seems very out of place. For one there are not any other spoilers in the text and this is information only revealed in the final book. I think it should either be removed or put into a spoiler space. The commentary on the end of the series not quite living up with the rest of the books is reasonably valid, but only from certain points of view, as some say that the whole metaphysical and spritual ending is foreshadowed throughout and is symbolic of the struggles, so it is point of view. Ben W Bell 06:32, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Devore

message: I'm fairly thrilled to see that someone thought to start an article on Chung Kuo, but was sad to see that so little has been done along the lines of really encompassing the series. 
I'd like to start expanding this. I'm a huge fan of the series and have been rereading this magnificent gem. Any objections?
Samuel John Klein (talk) 15:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone interested in levelling this article up?
Talk:The Fifth Mountain

message: I have a hazy memory on the precise ideas Coelho conveyed in this book since it's a while since I read it. Was it the case that God approved of Elijah all the more in the end because he when through a process of learning to take care of many decisions himself, thus building his character to be a better person (even though this sometimes meant he was going against God's own wishes)?
I really should read the book again to write for this article but in the meantime please correct this article if I've gotten it wrong. I tend to just remember the general feelings/ideas the book gave me rather than the plot specifics. Lisa 06:51, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Morals" of the story
Talk:Koryaksky

message: I'm wondering if the image in the right infobox is not Avachinsky. At Avacha Bay it is mentioned that way and the shape seems to correspond with :Image:Avacha volcano Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky oct-2005.jpg. Could someone point out what would be the right name for the vulcano on the photograph in the infobox and put this information also at :commons:Image:D0807I14-HarbourTour.jpg? --Hardscarf 09:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Karyaksky or Avachinsky
Talk:Jockey Club

message: One is listed as Merseyside and the other as Lancashire. As both fall within the so-called 'metropolitan county' of Merseyside area either list both as being within Merseyside or both as within Lancashire. The present list is not consistent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.15.94 (talk) 23:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aintree / Haydock 

message: Some anonymous editor has reverted my change to the club's history, for which I provided two solid references.  If some anonymous editor thinks those references are incorrect, some anonymous editor is welcome to provide better ones, but not to simply revert the change as if it were vandalism. Languagehat (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date
Talk:Shiveluch

message: June 2011 - the eruption was filmed by Russian TV youtube has the video here - and some coverage on 'Earthquake Report' website here suggests ash is 10km in the air and that VAAC will be reporting soon.EdwardLane (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: more info here from Kvert 4.7km ash plumes on 9 September 2011 and possibly 10.3km plume on 11 september (based on seismic activity rather than visual reports). EdwardLane (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: old eruption/paroxym 28 October 2010 - bbc video here — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwardLane (talk • contribs) 16:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  current eruption
Talk:Andy Hertzfeld

message: deleted false stuff about Andy's personal life.  The false account was appropriated from Alan Deutschman's book, "The Second Coming of Steve Jobs", which Alan got from talking to Linda Stone, who gave him false information to further her own interests.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.184.208.8 (talk • contribs) 07:14, 18 September 2005‎ (UTC)
:Source? In any case, these allegations made it into print, which means we might as well refute them instead of deleting them wholesale. Johnleemk | Talk 13:25, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of books about Apple contain erroneous stuff.  You don't want to give attention to falsehoods by refuting them.  Besides, personal stuff like that is inappropriate here, especially when it's controversial.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.184.208.8 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted
Talk:Firearm Owners Protection Act

message: I suspect that this page is a plausible landing for people hearing about said controversy and attempting to fact-check with wikipedia. This page is the redirect from "Hughes Amendment". Simply calling it a controversy is too sugar-coated and light on information from easily-cited reliable sources.
A: This section does not fact check the on-the-surface extraordinary claim that the outcome of the vote was reversed before being recorded -- which turns out to be a true claim verified by reliable sources.
B: This specific incident holds some political science value -- "How often are ethical abnormalities / rule violations in Congress recorded on C-SPAN? Is it more or less prevalent now versus the decades past?"
I also suspect it will be difficult to expand on the controversy in a neutral way while obeying WP:NOR, but this does not decrease the value of trying to make this article better.  ExtremeSquared (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Despite some controversy" in the Hughes Amendment 

message: Where are the repercussions of FOPA in the U.S.? There needs to be a section on the consequences of FOPA that ratcheted up gun violence in the U.S. There's a substantial amount of documentation on this. It would also explain why so few guns are registered in the U.S. Even Blue states have virtually no registered guns. This law is the reason why so few guns are ever registered in the United States. This needs to be explained. Stevenmitchell (talk) 09:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest finding some reliable sources that mention what you are talking about in context to FOPA and listing the best ones here to discuss. DN (talk) 14:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the Repercussions of FOPA in the U.S. in this article? 

message: Shouldn't the title of this article be "Firearm Owners' Protection Act"? That's what it's called in the body of the article, and most online mentions of it seem to include the apostrophe as well. Oooooooseven (talk) 18:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Punctuation
Template talk:Infobox London station

message: :Template:DLRexits2012 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:DLRexits2012]] 

message: Is there any possibility that the statistical sections (railexits, railints, tubeexits & dlrbats) could be presented in a collapsible section? They consume a lot of space when inserted into a page and these detailed statistics are of little interest to the average reader. Given that many railway station articles are light on textual content, this can cause unnecessary layout problems and preclude the addition of relevant images into the article. 
A collapsible section could be headed "Usage statistics", and its collapse state could be optional, giving editors the freedom to adjust the presentation to suit articles on a case-by-case basis. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 08:12, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS:COLLAPSE. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I read MOS:COLLAPSE before posting this and it doesn't preclude my suggested solution. "Auto-collapsing is often a feature of navboxes. A few infoboxes also use pre-collapsed sections for infrequently accessed details." Cnbrb (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapsible sections 

message: I can't see how to use mapframe with this template (as per ). Mapframe provides far more flexible mapping than the traditional static crop from openstreetmap, which seems to have been largely abandoned elsewhere. Have I missed something? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 22:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapframe? 

message: When the | coordinates = parameter is used (to display both lat/long at the top of the page and the location map), but the display=inline option is not used (ie display=title only), it still leaves the label WGS84, but without any value displayed, eg here. It provides no topical information, looks untidy and unnecessarily extends the infobox. Is there any way to get rid of the label? -- Verbarson  talkedits 13:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Avachinsky

message: Not sure why this was moved to Avacha Volcano - all the references I've read about it call it Avachinsky, and the article itself only uses that form.  Any objections if I move it to Avachinsky Volcano? Worldtraveller 09:57, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have taken the initiative and moved the page back to Avachinsky, which is by far the more common name for this volcano.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:GHQ Line

message: How about a map?
:You can create one yourself if you have reliable information about what it would look like, but don't copy any copyrighted images. Captain Jackson 05:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, we still need one --AW 08:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's seven years later.  Can some *REALLY* nice and smart person make a map for us?  The praise will be unlimited... :) Dinkytown talk 00:59, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I came to ask whether any knowledgeable person was able to post a map. But that was asked almost a decade ago, so perhaps I should just say “Hello”. JDAWiseman (talk) 22:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:Dahlonega, Georgia

message: I'm missing Camp Merill (U.S. Army) which is located nearby. Please add it. Scriberius (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Phaneritic

message: Phaneritic texture has no upper grain size limit. It just says that the grains are large enough to be distinguished with the unaided eye. Pegmatitic is also phaneritic but it's lower limit is not 10 mm. There are various opinions but pegmatitic is usually igneous rock which grain size exceeds at least 20 mm. Siim 07:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Grain size
Talk:Adam Savage

message: The "Career" section doesn't even mention Adam working for Mythbusters, or M5Industries. Considering these are the biggest and most notoriously known parts of Adam's career, how did this get missed?
MaxConfusion (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like there is a MythBusters subsection within the Career section. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Career" section is missing incredible amounts of info
Talk:Williamston, North Carolina

message: Is there anyway someone can add, "Gaylord Perry" to the famous people from Williamston, North Carolina list? Thanks. --Jennie Ambrose 09:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaylord Perry 

message: CORRECT PRONOUNCIATION IT WILLIAM-STON! Please leave your Jamesville, Williamston High School rivalries off of wikipedia! --Jennie Ambrose 03:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the unsourced listings.  They were probably just what you mentioned -- people adding their own names in a facetious manner.  Thank you for pointing those out.  SWAdair 05:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Stony Brook University Hospital

message: I think this should be organized better, and make different sections for the various schools associated with the medical center. (It seem more appropriate that those schools go here, rather than on the Stony Brook U page.) Iamdooser (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it the tallest building on Long Island? - Islander
*No, the Citibank bulding in Queens is. - New Yorker
**Yeah, but not counting New York City.  Is it the tallest building in Nassau and Suffolk Counties? - Islander
***It's very possible. I'll do some checking around. – ClockworkSoul 13:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the impression that the European American Bank building in Uniondale was the tallest on suburban Long Island. ----DanTD (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The EAB towers are Long Island's tallest office buildings at 15 stories, but the SB Medical Center stands 19 stories (and has quite a view, too). – ClockworkSoul 06:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tallest Building on Long Island?

message: I've been to this hospital before. — Hurricane Devon (Talk)  22:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And I work there. Creepy. – ClockworkSoul 23:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is something. — Hurricane Devon (Talk)  00:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Déjà vu 

message: I'm suprised no mention has been made to the medical center's recent problems, like how they were fined for 36 regulatory violations from May to July (http://1010wins.com/pages/127450.php?contentType=4&contentId=243399). Is there a reason why? -DenimForce2.0 18:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: The Clinical Sciences Tower (Phase I) was built first, not the BST.  The construction order was Clinical Science Tower, Hospital, Basic Science Tower.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.218.107 (talk) 10:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction Order