lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frank Sanderson

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. It was created as Frank Sanderson and then moved. I shall move it back. -- Necrothesp 22:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The second and third baronets are also named Frank Sanderson. However, their notability is questionable, although the third baronet led a campaign to built a memorial for the missing of the Battle of the Somme and received an OBE for it. Choess 17:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir George Hamilton, 1st Baronet, of Ilford

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's already a disambiguation page at "George Hamilton", and there are in fact three different individuals styled "Sir George Hamilton, 1st Baronet". Choess 15:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir Isaac Holden, 1st Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a quick check of Holden Baronets would have revealed that there is another Holden baronet called Isaac. The title is therefore neeed for disambiguation. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir James Outram, 1st Baronet

message: I understand that a bayard is a sort of mythical horse, but I don't get why Outram was called "The Bayard of India" or why it should be "poignant" that the phrase was inscribed on his tomb. I think this needs to be explained. CulturalSnow (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple - it was after the French knightly hero Pierre de Terrail, sieur de Bayard, known as "sans peur et sans reproche".Cloptonson (talk) 10:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Bayard of India

message: The infobox states his death place as Bromley in Kent. He actually died on holiday in Pau, southern France, as attested by his articles in the DNB and more recent ODNB - but his death could have been registered in the Bromley registration district where the informant lived or had returned (if an accompanying relative), assuming it was not a namesake of identical age and death date. (Note the index to GRO Death Records only mentions names, ages, date deaths.) I will correct the death place information accordingly.Cloptonson (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Death place

message: Saul David's 2003 book, The Indian Mutiny, chapter 18, says this:
Lady Canning was not so impressed by the unprepossessing figure who stayed at Government House for five days in early August [1857]. ‘He is a very common looking little dark Jewish bearded man,’ she recorded, ‘with a desponding slow hesitating manner, very unlike descriptions — or rather the idea raised in one’s mind by the old Bombay name the “Bayard of the East” . . . He is not the least my idea of a hero.’
Was this just Lady Canning's general anti-Semitism, or was Outram in fact Jewish?  Thomas Peardew (talk) 17:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family origins
Talk:Wilhelm Traube

message: Traubsche Purin synthesis
?--Stone (talk) 03:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ashley Faye Shíalelin Lughty Ntlonti. Popular known as Shi Shi is a Choreographer, dancer, singer, artist, creative and model. She is from France and South America, she is 23 years old and she is a mother to her 1 year old daughter Mikayla Khanyisa Étiennétte Ntlonti. Shi Shi's child has million followers and views, she posted her child dancing and the video got 100 million views and likes. Shi Shi is married to an South African Rapper, fashion model and dancer. Linamandla Smoky Ntlonti known as Qu. He is from KwaZulu Natal, Soweto and Limpopo South Africa, he has been with Shi Shi for 9 years since high school, they had their first child, the queen of dance was pregnant in 2020, their fans and family were happy for them. Qu and Shi Shi are 2 years grap Shi Shi is 23 years old and Qu is 24 but turning 25 years old. Shi Shi's first dance video at 16 years old but she was turning 17 in 2016 got million views. Worldwide choreographer and dancer who got a birthday present from Rihanna from the USA and she got products on her birthday from the world. 197.185.115.249 (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Worldwide choreographer and dancer
Talk:Hugo Rutherford

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Northern Star Council

message: To what extent may I add to this article without citing things? I'm sure I may be able to find most of the things I could add to it somewhere online, but I've been to Many Point four (or is it five?) times, and I'm sure I'd be able to contribute to it in some meaningful way. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blingice (talk • contribs).
:I've been to Many Point many times (as a scouter and a staffer). It probably won't matter too much if you add some information without a source. You should check out some back issues of the Lantern's Light alumni newsletter at the MPSAA website. The site has a wealth of information too. If you can't find a source for something, it should be okay to leave it for now, and if a citation is needed, it will be provided by me or someone else. —Zachary talk 06:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help? 

message: Merger Many Point Scout Camp into the council article per precedent; the camp does not show notability on its own. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 21:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many Point Scout Camp
Talk:Sir John Leslie, 4th Baronet

message: The photo/image of Jack Leslie in this article is terrible. It isn't worth keeping as there is no visible image of his face. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 13:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Apparently he credits his fitness to the relics of Saint Walpurga, but I can't find a ref.86.42.208.4 (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Longevity

message: The Baronetcy rules state: "Where the holder of a Baronetcy has died, but where up to 31st December 2022 no person has proved their succession, the Baronetcy is shown as either “Dormant” (Baronet died in 2017 or earlier) or “Vacant” (Baronet died in 2018 or later)." As the 4th Baronet died in 2016, the baronetcy should be annotated as "Dormant". However the official baronetcy site has it incorrectly designated as "Vacant". Gavin Lisburn (talk) 15:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Following correspondence with the Baronetcy Council, the status has now be corrected to 'dormant'. 2A00:23C8:3386:1C01:F484:95FF:FE26:6AAE (talk) 09:12, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vacant or Dormant
Talk:Pauline Musters

message: It says she is 58 cm, but then later it says 61 cm at her death? And it calls her the shortest, but Lucia Zarate says 51 cm. What's going on? --Lair of Rockwhales (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently Guinness recocgnizes the figure of 61 cm, her postmortem height. They've always (well, at least since 1981) had Zarate at 67 cm, and she holds the record for lightest – not shortest – person. She was twelve years old when the measurement of 51 cm was taken in 1876, this is mentioned in her article. --Anshelm '77 (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear measurements 

message: Is there a possibility we could use a different picture for her infobox? The current picture makes it appear she is the man, as you can barely see her. Naihreloe (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: In the "Life" section it says she died at the age of 17, but her profile says she died aged 19. FlailingMadness (talk) 22:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age at Death
Talk:Kenneth Pickthorn

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Michael O'Loghlen

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 4th Baronet was also named Sir Michael, and served as Lord Lieutenant of Clare. Choess 16:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Mary O’Connell’s brother (son of Dr Thomas Morgan O’Connell) wife was also an O’Connell, and she had O’Loughlin ancestors. 88.97.108.45 (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary O’Connell’s brother (son of Dr Thomas Morgan O’Connell) wife was also an O’Connell, and she had O’Loughlin ancestors.
Talk:Richard Denman

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Richard Mathias

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The second baronet was also named Sir Richard, but appears to be non-notable. Choess 17:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir Richard Tufton, 1st Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also Richard Tufton, 5th Earl of Thanet, but the baronet could probably be moved safely to Richard Tufton. Choess 16:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir Richard Wallace, 1st Baronet

message: Wallace's mother was the daughter of Sir Thomas Dunlop Wallace, of the family of Wallace of Craigie Castle, Ayrshire. Apparently, the family is descended from the Scottish freedom fighter, Sir William Wallace. (Source:Lisburn Historical Society Volume 3, part 2.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.243.161 (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANCESTRY 
Talk:Robert Gunter

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
File talk:Carta Marina.jpeg

message: Hi, I've started a discussion here about delisting this image as a featured picture. I feel that the stitching could be done a lot better. Looking at the panels from the U of M website, a better stitching job could be done even with the images currently available. Otherwise I do think it's a great map. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 18:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FP delisting
Talk:Sacheverell Sitwell

message: The last sentence is misleading, as he also concludes that some of these cases are likely genuine, if caused by an unknown sort of psi on the part of the putative agent, rather than a ghost or some other kind of disembodied agency. I will edit this sentence slightly to reflect this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.111.13.39 (talk) 03:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The description of his book on Poltergeists 

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be OK to move. The 7th Baronet goes by the name "Reresby", and it's hard to imagine what other Sacheverell Sitwell would take precedence over this one as principal holder of the name. Choess 17:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Gothic Europe, 1969, is a very partial work. The writer admits to never having visited Devon and is thus unable to locate Exeter within the development of English gothic in any accurate way. His avoidance of York results in the ommission of the only English example of thin-wall Rayonnant within the English great church tradition. As a piece of belle-lettre it is a good read. As a source of information it would be better to use the Shell guides for the pictures and Pevsner for real information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweatyman (talk • contribs) 10:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gothic Europe 

message: Sweatyman (talk) 10:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gothic Europe 

message: His wife's portrait is captioned: Georgia Doble Sitwell by William Acton (1906-1945)
I don't think the artist's dates are necessary, and I tried to remove them, but couldn't retrieve the picture. Perhaps someone else could perform this. Valetude (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption 
Talk:Sir Sydney Waterlow, 1st Baronet

message: An "S. H. Waterlow" was the Liberal candidate in the 1870 Southwark by-election. Was this the same person? I don't want to assume it was (even though the date, name, and party make this look plausible) as I cannot find any definite confirmation.--A bit iffy (talk) 12:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate in the 1870 Southwark by-election?
Talk:Sir Thomas Barrett-Lennard, 2nd Baronet

message: The dates don't make sense - the information comes from the White's directory entry for Aveley. I'll check and correct. Rjm at sleepers 13:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MP was 2nd baronet's father. Rjm at sleepers 13:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MP
Talk:Fowell Buxton

message: Any reason this man's first name is not included in the title of the article? LastDodo (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That was how he was commonly known. Bmcln1 (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

text: Doesn't matter how he was so called "commonly known". It is not correct and he is an important historical figure. No historian or encyclopaedia would make an entry under a so-called "commonly known" incorrect name. The monarch and the House of Commons certainly did not change his name, please! William Macadam (talk) 14:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  You are incorrect. Look up a few historical figures and see. Bmcln1 (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  So you believe all the numerous historical memorials (among them his his grave, Westminster Abbey memorial, Norwich Cathedral memorial, the Buxton memorial in Victoria Gardens by the House of Lords, removed for safekeeping from Parliament Square during WWII, and re-sited there afterwards or The Thomas Fowell Buxton memorial in Weymouth) to Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton are all wrong and all the books he authored are wrongly attributed by him as by Thomas Fowell Buxton and The Thomas Fowell Buxton Society is wrong? I am afraid you, Sir or Madam, are the one who is in error on this. There is not a single reputable historian that refers to him as you do by only his middle and last name? Wikipedia is supposed to be an accurate on-line encyclopaedia, my friend, not a rewriting of history to an obscure nickname source. William Macadam (talk) 23:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh oh ouch ouch. Sorry, the tone of this conversation ends it as far as I'm concerned. Rattle or battle on if you will. Bmcln1 (talk) 23:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source that would back up your view here? Thanks LastDodo (talk) 13:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name in title
Talk:Sir Thomas Dunlop, 1st Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Dunlop Baronets. There were several Thomas Dunlops who held this baronetcy. Keep this article at present location for disambiguation. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir William Bass, 2nd Baronet

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 09:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Sir William Douglas, 1st Baronet

message: Isn't there also a feudal barony of this name?  Is it in any way connected?
Cagney & Stacey (talk) 07:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barony of Castle Douglas 

message: Is this reference to an obelisk a mistake?  Should it refer to his mausoleum? Or is there a separate memorial?  Shipsview (talk) 09:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obelisk 
Talk:Handley Page Type W

message: There is a story by F. Britten Austin, dated 1920, called "In Mid-Air", which was republished in "Adventure Stories From The Strand", Folio Society 1995.
The door was closed upon the passengers in the saloon-interior of the aeroplane... There were ten of them, all men, each at a wicker chair at a window of the saloon, five on one side and five on the other, with a narrow gangway between...
Electric lamp-brackets provided for the contingency of a flight unduly prolonged into the hours of darkness. A little door in the after-wall led, by its indication, to a lavatory. Another little door, in the forward end... opened into a small compartment containing the petrol-tanks, pressure-pumps, etc., and thence communicated with the cockpit where the pilot and mechanic sat, in the open, behind their little glass windscreens. 
The interior appointments sound a lot like the HP W8 series! 
The atmosphere of the story is also authentic, making much of the deafening noise of the engines and the toytown appearance of the country below.
Patrick Miles 04:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I stumbled across a [detailed description of the W.8c] in the 16 November 1922 issue of Flight, and became curious, so I looked for other mentions of it, but I can't find any source saying that any examples of the W.8c were actually built. I think it never got past the drawing board, or at least never left the shop. This doesn't surprise me when I consider the financial difficulties facing the British airlines at the time, which in 1924 resulted in their merger to form Imperial Airways. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 23:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  W.8c version appears to have remained a paper project