Talk:Children's literature

message: I have added some more writing to this part. Hoping that the information is in the right section  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MlLa-k (talk • contribs) 17:55, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to the stereotypes, racism and cultural bias 

message: This sourceless is better served as paragraph in more established article. Coin945 (talk) 11:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, but not this one. A board book is an object, not a kind of literature. I suggest Book#By physical format or Picture book, which already mentions board books.  Robina Fox (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Agree with the alternative target of Picture book for Board book; it could be put into its own section there. Klbrain (talk) 13:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

text: I'm fine with Picture book; strongly disagree with Children's literature.  There's no good place to put it in this article. Dan Bloch (talk) 03:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Board book]] into [[Children's literature]] 

message: At more than 150kB, this article is too long, according to WP:SIZERULE, and should be split. I'd suggest lifting out the "Literary Criticism" section to make a new article, while writing a brief summary with a "Main" hatnote for here. Suggested title of the new article: Social issues in children's literature.
Other possible new articles would be on British children's literature and American children's literature, both overrepresented in this article's National traditions section. --- Robina Fox (talk) 21:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested split 

message: Now, of course I realize that there are thousands, and even MILLIONS, of works of children's literature Out There, and that it would be quite impossible to list them all. But, even so -- and having said that -- how on Earth do you have an article on Children's Literature, and never mention the name of Edith Nesbit so much as ONCE??? The Grand Rascal (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Please add something. Rwood128 (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What? So I watch someone knee-jerk revert me? Not likely; I've had more than enough of that with other articles. Let someone else have that aggravation for a change. The Grand Rascal (talk) 05:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why No Edith Nesbit? 

message: @Danbloch Could you please clarify what appears as a copyright issue in my contribution concerning the topic of "the translation of children's literature"? I had added citations to the information I submitted. I would appreaciate if you could explain how I could have avoided the issue, then, I would gladly revise my contribution.  Papyrus and Parchment (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The added text appears to have been copy-pasted from its source. This violates copyright, even when citations are given.  From WP:COPYPASTE, which discusses this in detail: "With the exceptions of short quotations from copyright text, and text copied from a free source without a copyright, text from other sources may not be copied into Wikipedia." Dan Bloch (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Danbloch I am grateful for your feedback. Although I have double-checked my contribution in terms of direct copying through softwares and been declared to have found no such case, I am most definitely considering these efforts to have produced a better contribution for the benefit of those interested in the topic of translation of children's literature. As I have mentioned, I have closely revised my contribution in terms of any copying issue and am currently submit it to reconsideration under the same title. Thank you! 88.255.55.90 (talk) 08:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requirement of clarification to revise my contribution