Talk:Video on Trial

message: Okay, for the last time, I do not want anyone putting her picture on any loser or disambig page in this Wikipedia. Because that verdict is just false. There is no reason to believe that Green Day would be doing a sequel to Jesus of Suburbia, or that Kanye West would be doing a sequel album to Jesus Walks. There is no such reason to also believe that they can just vandalize these pages with Hilton's picture. Because those are just made up humourous verdicts (which are not that humourous to me). Okay, that's my last post on this topic. Now I'm going onto something else. --Addict 2006 16:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Paris Hilton verdict

message: Can someone please take the time to clean up the verdict list and make the artists appear by alphabetical order by first name? --Addict 2006 02:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verdict list 

message: Should they be added? --Addict 2006 05:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to each song's articles? 

message: :Image:Videoontrial.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Videoontrial.jpg

message: The Most Accused Artists Section could use some updating/corrections. Here's the full list of all "repeat offenders" (4 appearances or more) in the accused videos as performers (counting solo performances, side projects, collaborations, etc.):
11 Videos
- Justin Timberlake
10 Videos
- Britney Spears
9 Videos
- 50 Cent
- Christina Aguilera
- Gwen Stefani
8 Videos
- Beyoncé
- Fergie
- P!nk
- Patrick Stump
7 Videos
- Travis Barker
- Chris Brown
- Mariah Carey
- Eminem
- The Killers
- Kanye West
6 Videos
- Tom DeLonge
- Fall Out Boy
- Ludacris
- Madonna
- My Chemical Romance
5 Videos
- Hilary Duff
- Dave Grohl
- Nicole Scherzinger
- Ashlee Simpson
- Snoop Dogg
- will.i.am
4 Videos
- Lily Allen
- Busta Rhymes
- Kelly Clarkson
- The Darkness
- Flea
- Foo Fighters
- Adam Levine
- Lindsay Lohan
- Jennifer Lopez
- Bert McCracken
- Missy Elliott
- Nelly
- *NSYNC
- Panic! At The Disco
- Queens of the Stone Age
- Shakira
- Jessica Simpson
- Weezer
- Jack White
...So should any of the list be added to the section, & if so, how much? And should it include details in parentheses such as which bands they were in, what collabs, etc. (because that might just make it cluttered)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SlyDante (talk • contribs) 00:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Accused Artists 

message: He is not on the show anymore. Shouldn't You put in the las episode he was on. And also they dont do verdicts anymore so just put wat the last jurour said as the verdict  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Guitar Master (talk • contribs) 17:31, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boomer Philips and Veerdicts