lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Storm Chasers (TV series)

message: I've changed the "Plot" section title to be "Story Line" with my last edit. The use of "Plot" for this show just doesn't... quite... fit... If you see what I'm getting at. I won't be upset if anyone wants to change it back, or if anyone wants to change it to something other then "Story Line". I simply feel that this may be an instance where we're taking an adhoc standard a bit too far, is all. I recognize that the use of "Plot" as a section in TV series articles has become basically standard practice, but Storm Chasers isn't really a show with a plot... it's more of a (decidedly dramatized) documentary then a Real World/Survivor style "reality television" show. I'm positive that the editors do dramatize events on the series, but it's still not set up in the same manner as "reality TV" series are.— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 03:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed "plot" section title 

message: I merged the List of Storm Chasers episodes content back to this one due to the simple fact that there is not enough content to justify two articles right now. After another couple of half seasons, or if Discovery Channel actually splurges for a full season of episodes, then I could see developing that list separately. Until then, it's just easier to work with and maintain a single article rather then an article and a List article.— V = I * R (talk to Ω) 04:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Does anyone know when the 2010 season of Storm Chasers begins?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.10.141 (talk) 13:29, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  upcoming season of Storm Chasers 

message: The article implies that the special dedicated to the trio is an episode of Storm Chasers.  It's not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgiesler (talk • contribs) 16:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mile Wide Tornado" not a Storm Chasers episode
Talk:Northampton station (MBTA)

message: This article has a bit of an identity crisis. Normal usage would dictate that it's located at the title of the current station, but the text and infobox are mostly about a station with a different name which closed in 1987. That's especially confusing when the Infobox only mentions the Silver Line in the services section, and places the station on the Washington Street Elevated, also closed in 1987. Mackensen (talk) 12:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity
Talk:Robert E. Howard bibliography

message: this is not really important, but isn't the black canaan more horror than fantasy story: it's also very similar with pigeons from hell, so shouldn't this article note it. both had idea took from folk tradition. --80.221.65.93 (talk) 13:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the black canaan 

message: I'd 'oppose the merger.  They were part of this list but a split them out into a separate list due to size.  The non-poem list is already near the 100kb "maximum" while the poem list is 145kb and I still haven't finished listing them all. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, merge would be crazy. Removing templates. Rich Farmbrough, 10:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with List of Poems 

message: This list would look better if the tables were all the same color. RockMagnetist (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table colors 

message: Just a suggestion, for someone who is sufficiently expert to do this: it would be very helpful to list the books as well as the titles.  For example, a reader is likely to want to know the relationship between, say, the late 1970s Sphere Books non-Conan works, and other editions of Howard's work -- there is a lot of overlap in the published editions, I understand.  Clarifying this would be very useful. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 22:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to list books 

message: The link from the title of the story People of Dark links to an article on a collection of the same name (which does include the story). Is this correct? Accepted practice? Just asking. Epigamic (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story = Collection ? 

message: I don't get it, I need to Sea Curse and From the Deep with a fine comb to make sure if I can't finds telling elements of location and datation, but up to better informed, I was always under the impression that Faring was in Southwest England, possibly Devon, Cornwall, or maybe South Wales or En glish locations along the Bristol Channel.   So I'm rather flabbergasted that Restless Waters, which obviously takes place in New England, should be put in the same series. Does somebody know why whoever did that edit placed it in there? I'm very tempted to edit the whole thing to place it as an independent story, but my editing skills are not up to the task
 --Svartalf (talk) 11:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restless Waters in the Faring Town saga?
Talk:North Quincy, Massachusetts

message: The old colony train station waws at the end of Sagamore Street, not Atlantic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.238.110.66 (talk) 19:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Staley School of the Spoken Word

message: This link was on the bottom of the article.  I have no idea what it was referencing, but just in case the editor who put it there wants it, here it is (http://books.google.com/books?id=LPHJlX4WDucC&pg=RA1-PA319&lpg=RA1-PA319&dq=Staley+spoken&source=web&ots=7x_bTtsrd5&sig=4jam_8XBtoLtZHpY7RA2sbhBLic&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result#PRA1-PA320,M1)  Gtwfan52 (talk) 22:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  unk reference
Talk:The Advocate (Fairhaven)

message: Removed the following text added recently by User:Fairhavenadvocate, which appears to be copied wholesale from the bottom of this page: http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=PUB01.
History
In 1979, Gil Vieira first began publishing The Advocate, a weekly newspaper dedicated to the interests of Fairhaven. In the nearly 30 years that has passed since the newspaper first hit stands, the publication has grown to cover the town of Acushnet. Since the late 1990s The Advocate has been printed by Hathaway Publishing, which is dedicated to serving the interests of our thousands of readers in Fairhaven and Acushnet.
Mission
Our mission is simple: provide you with the news and information you need to know about in our two communities. We strive to tell you interesting stories about your friends, neighbors, children, community leaders, and businesses offering important goods and services. Everything from police logs to school menus and church suppers can be found on our pages every week. Now many of these offerings can be viewed on line 24-7 at http://advocate.southcoasttoday.com as well. We are committed to sharing every bit of information we can in both print and on this website that has the potential to inform, educate and enlighten you.
Contact information
editor@advocatenewsonline.com
(508) 979-4350
FAX (508) 992 2333
PO Box 711, Fairhaven, MA 02719
http://advocate.southcoasttoday.com
I also question the notability of this article. It's your average weekly newspaper and this article, even if the deleted information were re-added (properly cited, paraphrased), doesn't say much more than one can find already at Hathaway Publishing. ``` W i k i W i s t a h ``` 04:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio and notability
Talk:The Recorder (Massachusetts newspaper)

message: This page should have a link to the disambiguation page of "recorder". Baccherini (talk) 21:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Is someone likely to type or link the search string  The Recorder (Massachusetts newspaper)  and expect to land anywhere other than here? Searching  The Recorder  or even  The Recorder (newspaper)  (without "Massachusetts") already does redirect to Recorder. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 22:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League/Cleveland Browns subproject

message: Greetings.  I have created an all-time list of Cleveland Browns quarterbacks on my userspace (User:Skudrafan1/List of Cleveland Browns quarterbacks).  I notice that another user has recently put a page entitled Cleveland Browns Starting Quarterbacks on the mainspace; however, I don't think I am being pompous when I say that my chart is better.  In any event, my question involves the feasibility of such an article on the mainspace anyway: the reason I created it on my userspace and haven't moved it to the mainspace yet is because I worry it would be met with an AfD.  What do you think?  Oh, and of course, go Browns! Skudrafan1 21:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleveland Browns quarterbacks 

message: Please stop by and voice your opinion in the ongoing discussion on the use of team colors in sports infoboxes. --Gman124 talk 14:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment on use of team colors in sports infoboxes
Talk:Coumpa

message: None of the external links are very authoritative.  Inconsistency of the name for starters. --JBellis 21:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The keyword is misspelt, the dish is called "Kompe", which is the same as Raspeball. The article about raspeball also discusses some of the many names this dish has.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.9.65.60 (talk) 00:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:1994 United States Senate election in Massachusetts

message: This is a very biased pro Kennedy page, it claims that Kennedy won the debate and does not mention he brought in union workers to lie about Romney.Solarcloth (talk) 21:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Source as given to support Kennedy winning the first debate (Boston Globe article).  Do you have reliable sources that indicate otherwise?  The article does discuss the Ampad workers being in negative ads against Romney, do you have reliable sources indicating they were lying?  Wasted Time R (talk) 01:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Chris Cillizza

message: I don't know who thought this was a smart move, but there's no such indication in the summary box on the WP pages of any other journalist that I could find, including every single other journalist that was let go by CNN on that same day. Additionally, he's just released a new book about the presidents, so it seems to me, that at the very least, if you're not going to change his title to "political commentator/author", I would think that the most accurate description would be "self-employed". He is clearly not "unemployed" which suggests he is not earning an income, which he is, if only from his book sales alone.
Source for claim he's an author, is his own Instagram page, among other places.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CreGYMtvnwx
At this moment, Tucker Carlson's page still lists him as being employed at FOX! (equally wrong, but still doesn't list him as "unemployed" which he very definitely is...)
I know these articles can get ppl far too excited, so I'll leave this for the regular editors on this page to deal with for now, if no one seems to respond, I'll make the edit.   Despayre  tête-à-tête 17:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employer: unemployed?! Seriously?
Talk:Peat Moors Centre

message: It seems that the centre has reopened under the name Avalon Marshes Centre. http://avalonmarshes.org/explore/avalon-marshes-centre/
2604:2D80:E594:3800:E436:A10D:7968:4B97 (talk) 18:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopening as Avalon Marshes Centre
Talk:San Francisco Film Critics Circle Awards

message: With respects, I removed the deletion prod because the awards are well-covered in reliable sources allowing notability per WP:GNG. So I added some. The article can be further improved by expansion and fourther sourcing per available sources found by a Google News search. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article 

message: After perfroming cleanup and sourcing on San Francisco Film Critics Circle Awards, I determined that the information here would be best if incorporated into San Francisco Film Critics Circle, the article about the parent organization.  The inclusion there of the information from here will not overburden that article. That is where the information might best be expected to be found, and a redirect of this article to that one will further conform with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:San Francisco Bay Area Film Critics Circle

message: After perfroming cleanup and sourcing on San Francisco Film Critics Circle Awards, I determined that the information therin would be best incorporated into San Francisco Film Critics Circle, the article about the parent organization.  The inclusion here of the information from there will not overburden this article. This is where the information might best be expected to be found, and a redirect of the old article will further conform with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Arab Chess Championship

message: For anyone attempting to complete this article, on this page  it says the 11th edition was played in 1995. Voorlandt (talk) 10:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But  says the 2007 edition was the 17th (suggesting 1991 was the first) Voorlandt (talk) 09:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completing this article 
Talk:Liqueur coffee

message: This article needs cleaning up, or is perhaps better deleted. It seems to have a collection of names whose criterion for inclusion is that some bar, somewhere, is thought possibly to have used the name some time. It is best dealt with as a sentence in the article on Irish coffee (which is more or less standard), redirected from "Liqueur coffee". If kept, at least the nonsense should be deleted. The Wikipedia guideline that everything should be sourced is useful here. A starting point would be to delete all entries that don't have a reference. Pol098 (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleaning 

message: This is not a synonym for "spirits" - see the Wikipedia article on liqueurs, which makes clear that many of the alcoholic drinks mentioned here are NOT liqueurs. Liqueurs tend to be sweet and syrupy (in most cases artificially sweetened), often with a medium rather than high alcohol content: Drambuie and Southern Comfort are liqueurs, but whisk(e)y is not. The term "liqueur coffee" may be in common use - though I'd never heard of it before - but the article should at least explain that it's a misnomer. I suspect someone got it mixed up with the American English "liquor", which does mean spirits in general (as in "liquor license" and "hard liquor"). These are not just alternative spellings of the same word - for one thing, they're pronounced differently ("LICK-er" and "li-CURE").213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: @Bawanio: I'm not convinced and have declined the speedy deletion. There seem to me to be two separate concepts: coffee-flavoured liqueurs like Kahlua, and alcohol-infused coffee drinks like Irish coffee or Rüdesheimer Kaffee. I think it is better to treat them separately, and not to move this article (mostly about coffee with alcohol in it) to the other name (which is mostly about coffee-flavoured alcoholic drinks and redirects to a relevant section). I suggest to open a formal move request if you still wish to move the page, or to consider having separate pages. —Kusma (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Liqueur" 

message: # Delete https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coffee_liqueur&redirect=no
# Move (or redirect) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liqueur_coffee to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_liqueur
--Bawanio (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Bawanio: I'm not convinced and have declined the speedy deletion. There seem to me to be two separate concepts: coffee-flavoured liqueurs like Kahlua, and alcohol-infused coffee drinks like Irish coffee or Rüdesheimer Kaffee. I think it is better to treat them separately, and not to move this article (mostly about coffee with alcohol in it) to the other name (which is mostly about coffee-flavoured alcoholic drinks and redirects to a relevant section). I suggest to open a formal move request if you still wish to move the page, or to consider having separate pages. —Kusma (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename the page to "Coffee liqueur"
Talk:First Unitarian Universalist Society in Newton

message: The society changed its name in 2017 to First Unitarian Universalist Society in Newton. See http://fusn.org/  Can the name of this page be changed accordingly?  Does a redirect from the old name to the new need to be created? NewtonCourt (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name
Talk:Jethro Coffin House

message: Hi Aidan721, I am not trying to be disruptive and am instead trying to understand why you keep removing categories from articles, such as this one, when it is clearly a physical structure that still exists in real life today, so it would need category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Buildings_and_structures_in_Nantucket,_Massachusetts. Can you please help me understand this better? NantucketHistory (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are categories for this article being removed?
File talk:VictorODJBLabel.jpg

message: I believe the date for this record is a little too early. It wasn't until after WWI that the words "Victor" weren't written on the phonograph in the trade mark image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.78.96.87  (talk • contribs) 
: Early 1917 was when the side was recorded, but the record stayed in print for some years. You may be right in that this may be a pressing from a couple years later than the original issue. Thanks for the interesting point. Is there a listing of Victor label variations and dates on line or if not in publication you can point out? Cheers, -- Infrogmation 23:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stonebridge, Saskatoon

message: The infobox says the land was annexed in the mid-1980s -- which is correct, though I don't remember the exact year. But the article says it was annexed in the 1990s. I'll fix that, but my concern is it may contradict the cited source. In this case the source is wrong if it's saying the land was annexed in the 90s. I lived near the annexation and I remember when it happened. 23skidoo (talk) 14:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Last fall the Star-Phoenix ran a series of articles about a controversy over the naming of Alm Crescent. If anyone can find the article, the controversy would be worth mentioning here. 23skidoo (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alm controversy
Talk:Nathaniel Topliff Allen Homestead

message: Somehow, the wrong address was put in originally.  It is definitely not 25 Webster St.  It is 35, not 25.  The mailing address is 35 Webster.  The entry in the National Register also shows 35 Webster.Star-lists (talk) 01:38, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The current NRHP Focus search still says 25 Webster.  The state MACRIS listing says 35, as does the house itself. Magic♪piano 16:29, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Address Corrected
Talk:Japan Academy Film Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film

message: The references on the page are mainly all linked to one of the films, which was a nominated film.--Mjs1991 (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:OpenProj

message: This software is quite useful, and is probably as notable as other open source project management software.  I would prefer to complete the article, rather than delete it. Brianegge 22:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When an article is being considered for deletion there is a message at the top of the article which includes a link to the place where discussion about the deletion can take place.  (SEWilco 17:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First deletion discussion 

message: The following information needs to be added to the article to make it clear that it is notable:
* List of Reviews in:
    * Newspaper articles;
    * Books;
    * User Guides;
    * TV Documentaries;
    * Magazine Reviews;
* List of distributions that include it;
* List of:
    * Multiple non-trivial articles;
    * Reliable published works:
          o newspaper and magazine articles;
          o books;
          o television documentaries;
          o websites;
          o published reports by consumer watchdog organizations;
    * Awards it has won;
    * Distribution channels;
jonathon 22:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software Notability
Talk:Max Hall

message: The formatting of the bottom of the article is all messed up. Someone should fix. Johncolton (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting messed up 

message: He is described as a devout Mormon.   Need a reference to clearly show that he is "devout".  How do we define devout, what are the objective criteria that are used?  How do we not know he is simply an average follower of the religion and not "devout".Mwinog2777 (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Devout
Talk:Bigfoot Presents: Meteor and the Mighty Monster Trucks

message: The name "Crushington" foreshadowed Crusher and Darington's names from the later 2014 also monster truck-based BATMM (IDK why in every episode Darington appears, he and Crusher never actually interact or speak to each other) 2601:58B:E7E:240:A895:7AFF:401F:EEFE (talk) 06:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun fact I realized before
Talk:Patriot Place

message: I work at the Patriot Place complex in one of the stores, and I could fill out the list of shops easily, but I was wondering at what point the shops aren't important. Obviously, big, unique stores like the Bass and the Skipjack's are notable, but what about the Bar Louie? The Five Guys? What should be a general guideline for importance? 72.70.10.81 (talk) 02:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think what we currently have is fine. Leo-Roy! review/gb 20:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of shops 

message: Is a $46,000 payment dispute really a true controversy on a $350 million project?  This hardly seems worth keeping.  Shouldn't trivia like this be removed under WP:BOLD?  But the last person to remove it was reverted. 24.62.2.251 (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivial controversy
Talk:Pemberton Mill

message: Seeing as how this was recently found to be the deadliest building collapse in American History(excluding acts of terror) it should get a more notable name, not be a subpage
:That is not how naming works and that is your WP:OR. — Smuckola(talk) 17:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename page to "Pemberton Mill Collapse" or "Collapse of Pemberton Mill"
Talk:Origins of religion

message: Since editors have disputed the relevance of archeological information on the article Development of religion I have moved the content to this article where there should be no dispute on the relevance of the information. Muntuwandi 22:42, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: development of religon

message: Change #REDIRECT Evolutionary origin of religions to #REDIRECT Evolutionary origin of religion per page move. Treetoes023 (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 15:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 9 February 2023