Talk:FC Bayern Munich

message: At a cursory glance the kits as presented per today were incorrect for 1968/69 and 1972/73. The standard home-kit for 1968/69 can be seen here (scroll down). Easily recognizable the old stadium and players like Mucki Brenninger (left) and Werner Olk Between Bulle Roth (with the trophy) and Schwarzenbeck (to his right Gerd Müller). In the cup final Bayern played in all-red (as can be gleaned from here). The standard home-kit from 1972/73 can be seen here. I personally do not have the skills to make the appropriate changes. Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 01:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic Kits 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was:  Not Moved - No Consensus Current name and proposed names are clearly covered in the article and dealt with ample redirects so readers are not being shorted here.  Additionally, the current title is consistent with sports naming conventions and there are almost another dozen collateral articles using the current title convention re: FC Bayern Munich.  Mike Cline (talk) 12:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: FC Bayern Munich →  – "FC Bayern Munich" is neither the WP:COMMONNAME, which is "Bayern Munich", nor the official English name which is "FC Bayern München". As such, I propose moving this article to "Bayern Munich" as it best meets WP:CRITERIA and WP:NCST does not apply as there is , although if there is a consensus against that I would support "FC Bayern München" as an improvement over the current title. BilledMammal (talk) 07:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

text: *Changing from weak support to support. Discussions below seem to indicate that both FC Bayern Munich and FC Bayern München are used in official English-language contexts, but neither the oppose nor support !votes seem to disagree that the proposed title is the common name in English language use. And my Yankees and Red Sox comparison doesn't really work here -- while coverage of those teams commonly at least introduces them with the city included, English language coverage here most commonly just uses Bayern Munich without putting FC first.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

text: *That's not our naming policy though -- we use the common name in reliable English language sources, not the longest one used sparingly. It would be one thing if articles overwhelmingly introduced the club with a long name and then used a short one after, but that doesn't appear to be the case. I'm not sure I buy the idea that, say the New York Times or the BBC feel they need to use "Bayern Munich" because adding two letters would make it ridiculous.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 February 2022 

message: Hello page watchers. I'm going through the good article cleanup listing to reassess old GAs. This article is in need of a lick of paint to maintain its GA status,
* See the various tags in the main article.
*  Much of the 'other departments' is in tiny sections and unsourced.
* There is disproportionate attention to later years in the history. 
Anybody here wants to pick it up? If not, I'll likely nominate for a WP:good article reassessment in a couple of weeks. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment 

message: he was sacked 110.142.185.173 (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas tuchal 

message: Changers556 (talk) 23:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 23:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2024