lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nicholas Herkimer

message: There seems to be some variation in the year of birth given in various articles about Gen. Herkimer.  Some more recent and reputable sources seem to agree on 1728.  Older sources give a range from 1715 to 1720.  I agree that 1728 does seem late when we read of him as a wizened old soldier at the Battle of Oriskany in 1777.  But I guess 49 was considered pretty old at the time.  Nonenmac 01:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, bob.  If we have good references for the dates, we should briefly mention the discrepancy in the article. 165.189.91.148 18:15, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I don't know if this warrants being placed in the Legacy section, but during World War II a liberty ship was named after Gen. Herkimer. My father served on the USS Nicholas Herkimer.--Karenthewriter (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Notre Dame Catholic Sixth Form College

message: This has been copied from the Notre Dame website, this is probably voilation of copyright but not sure.Rex the first talk | contribs 01:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Template talk:Spaceplanes

message: See the Template:Space Shuttles Talk page for the discussion on this template and the "Space Shuttles" Template. Thehardwareman 01:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Because they are repeatably adding planes that have been canceled to the active list and adding active planes to the canceled list (X-51, SpaceShipTwo, SpaceShipThree...).--Craigboy (talk) 22:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can people who know nothing about this topic stop editing it? 

message: Does Adeline count as a spaceplane?  After all, it goes up beyond 100 km, re-enters, has wings, lands horizontally on a runway. You could think of it as a spaceplane that pushes a huge disposable drop-tank in front of it.  I'm not sure ... --SteepLearningCurve (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Adeline count as a spaceplane? 

message: The top-level division into sections by country makes this template very tall, sparsely populated and difficult to read. I would suggest keeping just four sections "Active", "In development", "Retired / Historical" and "Cancelled", then place country flags next to each project. This would be similar to other navboxes such as ,  ,  or  . Comments welcome. — JFG talk 09:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplify template 

message: The template currently lists Hypersonic Flight Experiment (HEX) and ALFLEX, past flights which were atmospheric in nature (not reaching 100km or 50mi). The two were technology demonstrators for later spaceplane development, but the fact that they never reached space makes their listing here questionable. The template should be either restricted to 'true' spaceplanes (excluding Hypersonic Flight Experiment and HYFLEX), or include all spaceplane-related atmospheric demonstrators like BOR-1, X-33, X-40, etc. Hms1103 (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of listing criteria 

message: Neutrality tag (Minor POV problem) was added to U.S. Black Programs sub-section in July 2020. User that added tag was banned indefinitely. Tag did not include an explanation of neutrality issue or any reference in talk page. Tag was generating "issue" for all articles that used the template. I removed tag from the template as it was included without an explanation or rationale. Please reach out to me if you would like to discussSpaceHist65 (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Black Programs - POV tag
Talk:Tulcea

message: The Venetian language page says they speak a variety Venetian here, is that the case?
:It also says it was a Venetian outpost, but this article indicates it was Genovese. Can anyone clarify?207.6.233.239 17:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venetian 

message: "It was then ruled by the Byzantine Empire (8th - 9th century), the Genoese (10th - 13th century),..."
: 10th century is years 901-1000. The Republic of Genoa was founded in "ca. 1100", that's 11th -  12th century. Do I need a history lesson? --Illythr 00:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the comment above (Venetian), I wonder if was ruled by Venice? This would make more sense chronologically. Can anyone confirm? 66.183.217.31 00:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Muʻa (Tongatapu)

message: Shouldn't this article be Mu'a(Tongatapu) per wikipedia policy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.220.94.199‎ (talk) 21:28, April 24, 2006‎ (UTC)
:You might be right. But rather then Mu'a_(Tongatapu). Change it (and others) if you want. --Tauʻolunga 02:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
File talk:Crazy Frog - Crazy Frog Presents Crazy Hits CD cover.jpg

message: u r the best and i love all of ur songs and avery thing u  r the best i love u.  u r the coooooolest thing in the world and the way u look is so coool if u could e-mail me all of ur songs then that would be gr8t kk
That's hardly beneficial.  Please say something worth saying, or don't say anything at all.  Ntay 03:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nightfall (video game)

message: The article says: "It is claimed to be the first real-time 3D first person adventure game"
This claim is obviously wrong. There have been games like "Normality, Inc." (1996) and "Under A Killing Moon" (1994) years before. Maybe "Nightfall" is the first one on Mac computers? If that's the case then it should be pointed out more clearly, otherwise the misleading sentence should be removed. 178.5.144.68 (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First real-time 3D first person adventure game ??? 
Talk:Army Benevolent Fund

message: The article is completely incorrect, the charity has been renamed BACK to the Army Benevolent Fund. Check the website. 82.1.86.17 (talk) 04:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please can someone rename the article page to Army Benevolent Fund Our History - Army Benevolent Fund the name changed but we dont have the correct account to edit it. 185.38.114.42 (talk) 14:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs correcting, and renaming
Talk:Essex Yeomanry

message: I have just changed the article to link to a new one I created on George Palmer (Lieutenant Colonel), but now I'm a little confused, re-reading his father's (George Palmer (MP for South Essex)) bio. There must be a mix-up, because this article says he retired in 1868, but GP Sr died in 1853. Also, according to GP Sr's article (from DNB), after serving as sheriff of Herts in  1818, "For many years he supported at his own cost a corps of yeomanry, and acted as colonel of the corps" - but there is no other mention of his having been in a regiment. Is this a mistake in DNB? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: George Palmers confusion
Talk:Clandestine in Chile

message: I don't think changing the tense is a good correction, I woudln't ccall it a correction. This is a book, it is always present. On the ather hand other "corrections" made before by Brianyoumans do not make the article better, not at all.--tequendamia 02:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar tense "corrections"
Talk:Accademia Carrara

message: I refer to the term "nominated commissary" - would that in fact be the same as the will's executor, or similar term that would be used in Anglo law?  ρ¡ρρµ δ→θ∑ - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 02:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I'm a student, so if I did something wrong that was not my intention, I am not an hacker or something like that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.63.125.166 (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  My contribution
Talk:Return to Del

message: Who agrees that this article had a great major cleanup? Just look at this first version of the page.
* [First Version of this page]
That version was bad. Weirdy 00:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is still baddly written.....Lord GaleVII 16:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article.
Talk:Superdense coding

message: "Quantum dense coding" and "Superdense coding" mean the same thing. The two articles should be merged asa proposed. Cryptonaut 02:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, merge 'em. —Keenan Pepper 02:45, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A IP user has requested that the diagram on this page the modified. They wrote: "Please flip b_1 and b_2 on sender's side! Thanks!" into the figure caption. I am moving the request here where it should be. I would make the change myself, but I'm not sure that it's actually correct or not. —♫CheChe♫ talk 15:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The current version of the diagram is correct. --Robin (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction for diagram. 

message: This page is missing experimental results even though the field is very active. For example:
this was the first experimental demonstration of superdense coding, where they achieved 1.58 bits per qubit (not a perfect 2): https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4656 (they used polarization of photons). 
This year researchers exceeded the two-bit limit using high dimensional entanglement. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/7/eaat9304
This group was the first transmit superdense coding over optical fiber. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.050501  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldfee (talk • contribs) 21:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  current experimental applications of superdense coding 

message: It seems like quantum dense coding, superdense coding, and dense coding are all used interchangeably. I think the first sentence should include them all to clarify that. Add an aka.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldfee (talk • contribs) 21:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature  

message: Could there perhaps be some explanation of the overview statement "Alice must tell Bob which gate to apply after he receives the entangled qubit in order to obtain the correct classical bits." It does not seem to be explained anywhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.183.247 (talk) 14:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps some further explanation is needed...
Talk:Tami Hoag

message: I know little about this Tami Hoag, but most of the links on this page were messed up in some way.  Many were of the form #123 Foo, which turned into HTML intra-page links.  Some others pointed to the wrong article - I've attempted to disambiguate, and hopefully have not broken any of them.  Most of the links are to currently non-existent articles anyway. unsigned by Johndburger 02:36, 25 April 2006 
I agree with this  - but mainly, will whoever wrote the info on Ms. Hoag, PLEASE consult a reference for grammar!!  In "Biography" portion, shown as "...older than her."  For Pete's sake, it is older than "SHE!!!!"  8th-graders would be marked-off for this.  Will the people writing these things, and editing them, either desist if so ungrounded in grammar, or please consult some reference material? unsigned by 70.189.121.96 17:57, 3 February 2007
The link for "Keeping Company," which was published in 1990, leads to a page for the movie "Keeping Company" which was released in 1940; the two are not related.  I just happened to come upon this by accident.  Someone really needs to either create the proper pages, or leave the link out.  JMHO  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.178.198.94 (talk) 06:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed all of the wikilinks except those that went to pages for her books. --Marc Kupper|talk 21:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messed-up Links 

message: Poorly written article, does not appear to meet WP:NBOOK. 162 etc. (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Ashes to Ashes (novel)]]
Talk:Kinesis (biology)

message: I dont fully understand the difference between a taxis and a kines since they are both movements in response to a stimula.
:Think of it like this. If you smelt some nice food, you could either move directly towards it, or you could simply move about randomly, becoming decreasingly active as the smell got stronger. The result would be more or less the same, though kinesis would probably take you a lot longer to find the food. Taxis is where an organism moves in down a gradient of a certain stimulus, whereas kinesis involves a random movement known as brownian motion that becomes slower or faster depending on the strength of the stimulus. Richard001 02:42, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case it should read that the movement is 'non-directed', not 'non-directional', no? 141.70.82.221 (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxis vs. kinesis
Talk:Causal plane

message: In the Autobiography of a Yogi, Paramahansa Yogananda gives the reader a comprehensive and forceful view on the existence of the Causal plane. The information here is somewhat similar to what is present in the article but with more detail. Do you think it is a good idea to include this information in this article. Mind you, Yogananda got this information from his guru Sri Yukteswar after he had passed away! --Siva1979Talk to me 02:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My reply is the same as with the Astral Plane.  Sure, add a  new section on Yogananda's and Yukteswar's teachings on this. M Alan Kazlev 12:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yogananda's view on the Causal plane
Talk:Parker

message: This page is obviously some sort of joke, containing no information relevant to any topic.  How can we go about deleting it? The name is becoming more common.
Dblecros 19:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was just vandalism that needed reverting.  violet/riga (t) 22:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be deleted.
Talk:Ibn Arabi

message: I've created the Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi Society article. If we look over that along with Akbariyya and Ibn Arabi and theoretical mysticism, would there be a basis for creating a template for Ibn Arabi? Would any of his prominent students, or perhaps some of his works, also have a place on such a template? I don't think I've created on before, so I'm not sure what sort of guidelines there may be. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility of a template? 

message: The correct spelling in Arabic is ابن العربي ibn al-‘Arabī (See: Ash-Sha’ranī, Tabaqāt al-Kubrā, 1/227). How can we change? The current spelling for accurately represent the addition of “al” in the article title while preserving older links that direct  here without the “al”? 204.197.177.17 (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change heading/name to proper noun 

message: Ibn Arabi and theoretical mysticism has Great overlap and might be WP:REDUNDANT. FatalSubjectivities (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It looks like a content fork. MartinPoulter (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from  [[Ibn Arabi and theoretical mysticism]]
Talk:St. Joseph's Secondary School (Cornwall, Ontario)

message: What is there say? -- Usgnus 20:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Zodiac P.I.

message: *http://www.mania.com/10-greatest-anime-detectives_article_121376.html Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 22:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Reduction of order

message: i added in a simple example but it needs further editing. I will fix this in a little bit Rompala
yeap this works fine, could be tidied up a little bit Duivesteyn 02:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I dont think the An Example sections is correct. It uses the fact that y1(x) = e^(-bx/2a) in order to conclude that the coefficient of v′ is 0. Except, thats not true in general--in fact, that is true exclusively when the discriminant vanishes and we shouldn't get a second solution.
ConnorCremers (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with example
Talk:Truck Festival

message: This article is written as an uncited blog. As is, it is unencyclopedic. Davodd 03:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think there are problems with the article, by all means tag it and discuss specifics on the talk page, but don't just go and wipe 90% of the article unless you think it's unsalvageable or untrue. — sjorford++ 13:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

message: If possible, please cite them - especially if they're implausible! Newartriot 04:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumours

message: Truck Records has been tagged for notability for 7 years, unresolved. I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, but would be a useful merge and redirect. Pinging those who have been involved in creating article/commenting on its notability before: , , . Boleyn (talk) 07:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[Truck Records]] to here
Talk:1:00AM-2:00AM (24 season 5)

message: lol... judging by the edit history, I didn't even need to watch the show. I could get it real-time right here... heh. Good work, all. 
:Ah. You noticed that, eh? haha. ^_^  dposse 21:16, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the President was talking to "Graham", who is a "power-broker" according to Fox's 24 website.  He is played by another RoboCop alum, Paul McCrane JurgenHadley 22:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Wikipedia talk:Concordia/Elections/Nominee Suffrage

message: What do we need rule number two for if we have rule number one? I mean think about it, If you can't vote in your catergory than you couldn't vote for yourself. ILovEPlankton 03:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarification - don't want any more mistakes/contoversies/whatever.  Can't hurt.  -zappa.jake (talk) 04:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Manischewitz

message: An interesting piece of information that might be worth adding to the page about the partnership they made with Welchs lately on Kosher Grape Juice and the Grape Juice 'War' that unfolded with Kedem.
More info can be found in the NYT Article: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/nyregion/kosher-passover-welchs-manischewitz.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efroim102 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Grape Juice War with Kedem (2016-17)
Template talk:The Godfather

message: *Captain McCluskey
*Jack Woltz
*Emilio Barzini
*Moe Greene
*Carlo Rizzi
*Ottilio Cuneo
*Paulie Gatto
*Amerigo Bonasera
*Al Neri
*Philip Tataglia
*Joey Zasa
*Tommasino
*Don Altobello
*Rocco Lamone
*Teresa Hagen
*Andrew Hagen
*Victor Stracci
*Aldo Fanucci
Obviously we don't need all of these, and there may even be some we should have that I forgot to list.  Which ones should we add to the 'Other Characters' list?
Sdoroudi 03:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other characters we should consider adding

message: I've re-done the template layout but kept all of the same links (including Khartoum) in place. Please feel free to change it or let me know what you think. - Hollis1138 19:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Mountain Dew LiveWire

message: Please stop your current edit war over the wording of an and an alternative. Instead please use this page to civily debate which word to use. Personally I feel that an is much more NPOV however I will leave it to you two. Please stop at any rate. SorryGuy 03:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Four tildes makes Teke 16:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Edit War 

message: I think the current picture of Mountain Dew Live Wire is too much of the color yellow and does not represent the correct color.67.140.36.72 00:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current picture of LiveWire
Talk:Parietal foramen

message: Where is it?--Light current 03:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The illustration clearly shows two holes at the back of the skull. Do they serve the same function of allowing "emissary veins" to pass through, or are they asymmetrical in that one of the holes allows a different type of vessel passage?
Also, why does a branch of the occiptal artery only "occasionally" pass through this route? --82.21.97.70 (talk) 06:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It" or "they"
Talk:Agnès b.

message: How do you pronounce "Agnès b."? Some source said "Anne-yes beh" (where beh sounds like the "be" in "better"). Sorry I could only speak Anglais. 71.51.25.20 20:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's closer to bay than beh, I would say. 86.44.27.243 (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Is her last name actually "b."?  Or is it just the name of the fashion label? --Galaxiaad 16:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably it's the name she goes by, short for something beginning with B. Since she's quite the film buff, it's possible she got the idea from Agnès Varda, who once made a film about Jane Birkin and called it Jane B. par Agnès V. 86.44.27.243 (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Real name?
Talk:Pepper (band)

message: Jesus, the section about the DVD is foaming at the mouth with delight at THE BEST BAND EVER LOLOLOL!!ZAZA!! releasing a paltry morsel of new material. It's been excised. aubrey 03:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I reviewed the article and the above comments, I see strong evidence of restoration of NPOV. The tag (undated) is from May 2006, and much of the POV material has been removed. Removing POV tag. Keep up the good work at building a NPOV informative article regarding this band. DocGratis 14:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:TurboDuo

message: Wow, no mention of MindRec or BT Garner. Both of the Turbo Duo/PCEngine Duo games developed by MindRec for retail are still for sale.RandwulfX (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MindRec 

message: Just wondering... Why isn't this and the SuperGrafx page merged with the TG-16 page? BcRIPster 07:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger question 

message: The official spelling of the console seems to be "Turbo Duo", as two words, not "TurboDuo", per the console's own packaging, as well as this sales brochure. Pretty tempted to move the page and edit the article if there isn't any objections. Jonny2x4 (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling convention
Talk:Ronson flamethrower

message: I haven't found very many references calling this the "Ronson system" (and Ronson tanks, seem to refer to all Shermans in general due to there thin armor, and German tanks ability to 'light them up' with one hit ).  Instead I have found a few references calling these "Zippo tanks" 
  
*http://www.174ahc.org/jansn01.htm
*http://ftp.metalab.unc.edu/hyperwar/USMC/USMC-C-Iwo/index.html
*http://www.nps.gov/wapa/indepth/extContent/usmc/pcn-190-003131-00/pcn-190-003131-00/sec6.htm
True it seems that the Ronson flamer thrower is what is being used, however that doesn't seem to be the common name for this sort of weapon.  I suggest we move this article to Zippo tank.  Comments, suggestions, alternatives....  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 03:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronson or Zippo

message: Someone wrote this into the original page before I put up the expert banner:
"The so called "author" obviously didn't do his research. When he stated that the Ronson System was only used by the Marines, this is incorrect. The Ronson System may have been primarily used by the Marines but was also used by the Army in the ETO. For the Marines had absolutely nothing to do with Operation Overlord."
Dunno what that's about but I suppose the page should be sorted out. Cwilli201 01:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert Banner

message: Hi, I've just translated the page Ronson flamethrower in french. But I read now on the Lagonda flamethrower page that this one received once the codename "Ronson". Shall these two pages be merged? Waiting for advices. Cheerfully, ChoumX (talk) 14:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Ronson and Lagonda ?