lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ketonemia

message: What is the difference between ketonemia and Ketosis? Perhaps the two articles can be merged.--DThomsen8 (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The difference between hyperketonemia and ketosis is explained in the latter. Mikael Häggström (talk) 03:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ketonemia and ketosis
Talk:Letterer–Siwe disease

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM. Calmer Waters 07:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: Not mentioned in article. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "reticulosis" redirect here?
Talk:Lipedema

message: The Australian source that is cited to support this statement says exactly the opposite - that women of any weight can get this disorder. Same thing said by the UK’s National Health Service site. So I’ve removed it from the main article and also the side bar as a risk factor. Dakinijones (talk) 08:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Association between obesity and lipedema 

message: Current image is of an incredibly severe case of lipidema which gives a false idea of what vast majority of suffers experience. So we should find a mild image instead or as well as the one we have. Unfortunately I’m no good with tracking down Creative Commons images. Dakinijones (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need image of milder case 

message: Perhaps because it is only treated by cosmetic practitioners, this "condition" has no diagnostic code and its treatment probably is not compensated by insurers. If a person went to an internal medicine specialist with this condition, they might be given a weight loss diet to follow, but the physician wouldn't offer to treat them directly for it. In fact, if a diabetic person with this condition went to an internist, and the internist could see their legs, the internist would not mention to them that they have this debilitating condition, nor offer to treat them for it. With any other clearly observable condition, if a physician overlooks it, that's medical malpractice.
In my opinion, this condition is a construct of German cosmetic practitioners, and therefore can only "affect" (business being business) people in their ambit. What is the incidence in Japan? What is the history of the understanding of this illness? Is it preventable? How many life-years are lost to it annually? Has this "debilitating condition"'s worldwide incidence been scientifically studied?
Numerically, what are the effects of treatment? What is the "official" disease progression? Does anyone collect disability payments as a result of it? What are the diagnostic criteria? Are there any support groups? And, has its causation been studied scientifically? This entire topic is about as connected to the field of medicine as are double chins and split hair ends. Why do we even allow it? Agree that the "concept of lipedema" is worthy of our coverage (if RS do as much), but mythology presented as fact, which this is, is not worthy.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You’re funny.  The medical diagnosis code for this disease is E88.28.  It’s not fake news. 2600:4040:B35A:7600:31E5:56E4:D2D5:E28D (talk) 02:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this a medical condition? 

message: it mostly talks about sufferers as women, I have it and am a man The JOJOLands (talk) 12:03, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very sexist wording
Talk:Lucy Ellmann

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... there is a impressive list of fellowships, prizes, and residences.-ch (talk) 05:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Outline of health

message: If I create yet another list for alternative medicine it will be deleted.  The only reason that the List of terms and concepts used in alternative medicine was not deleted is because it was renamed Glossary of alternative medicine. It is seems that the criteria for inclusion on this list is quite a bit absurd from my very basic point of view. -- John Gohde 03:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since when is a Glossary NOT a List? 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: A discussion is underway that may affect the name of this article.
See: Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Should articles named "Outline of x" be renamed to "List of x topics"?
The Transhumanist 04:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straw poll and discussion concerning what outlines should be called 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Löfgren syndrome

message: Two sentences involving the genetic association of DQB1*0201 and DRB1*0301. In almost all individuals, excepting rare occurrences in Africa and unlikely a subject of genetic associations the two loci are within the same haplotype.
This haplotype is part of the ancestral haplotype found in Europeans called AH8.1.
It is composed of (using the new and approved nomenclature - see IMGT-HLA)
A*01:01-C*07:01-B*08:01-DRB1*03:01-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01
There are other haplotypic variants, in Sardinia there is the
A*18:01-C*05:01-B*30:02-DRB1*03:01-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01 haplotype that represents one of the highest frequency haplotypes for a people in the western world.
It is simpler and more accurate to say that there is an involvement of the DR3-DQ2.5 haplotype (see Celiac disease for a discussion of DQ2.5). Or in obsolete lingo HLA DR3-DQ2
You can verify the allele and haplotype frequencies using //www.allelefrequencies.net
PB666 yap 20:31, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A note on the genetics
Talk:Lymphocytopenia

message: I support the proposed merger with lymphopenia. WhatamIdoing 01:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I
Talk:Macular hole

message: This is an automatically generated summary article which has been sourced to several sites on the web.  Please edit and improve this text. 128.30.44.75 (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Automatically Generated Stub
Talk:Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis

message: Should "Marantic endocarditis, also known as non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis" be switched to say "Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis, also known as marantic endocarditis"? This would fit better with the page title. Piraka Mistika (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading sentence
Talk:Mediastinitis

message: Hello all, my goal is to improve this page over the next four weeks. I will aim to complete the following work-plan:
Proposed Work Plan	
12/3/18	                
* Drafted and published this work plan to the talk page
12/3/18 - 12/11/18	
* Edit Acute Mediastinitis sub-section following literature review into this topic. 
12/11/18 - 12/14/18	
* Add images for Acute Mediastinitis, including diagrams to better show anatomy. 
 
* Will attempt to find images that address diagnostic criteria for acute mediastinitis. 
12/14/18 - 12/21/18	
* Edit Chronic Mediastinitis sub-section and add images to subsection. 
* Complete citations and references. 
* I would like to wrap project up by editing the introduction/overview at the top of the wikipage that accurately summarizes page and what information can be found on page. 
Thank you and I look forward to you feedback. 
Isbrown (talk) 06:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Medical emergencies

message: I am not a qualified medical man, so I am not qualified to edit this, but would it be an idea to have, in addition to medical emergencies per se, some articles on assessments of people routinely taken by ambulance staff (such as pulse rate) when people when are needing medical emergency medical care here? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Meige's syndrome

message: I can't believe nobody else has challenged the assertion that  cranio-mandibular orthopedic misalignment "has been shown to cause" Parkinson's disease! This is bolstered by a "diary" in a minor journal. I see that this bold statement has proliferated in the way that anything from Wikipedia does, but no other actual sources exist for it. The Parkinson's Foundation (http://www.parkinson.org/understanding-parkinsons/) doesn't list it. Wikipedia doesn't list it.
The whole sentence seems sketchy, so I'm removing it. If someone can find better support for the rest of it, they're welcome. Lucy Kemnitzer (talk) 14:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Memory disorder

message: With all due respect I find the "Cultural Perspectives" section of this article to be in need of a bit of improvement, both in terms of language and relevance to the article as a whole. I've fixed a few grammatical errors and made some improvements to the language but still find some sentences hard make sense of.
Julipanette (talk) 19:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cultural Perspectives" upgrade 

message: Information in this section does not support the idea that this syndrome is a disorder as defined in the lead section of this article. The lead section states "Memory disorder is the result of damage to neuroanatomical structures that hinders the storage, retention and recollection of memories." Please explain how a superior memory is compatible with that quotation.1archie99 (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperthymestic Syndrome section Suggestion Comment 

message: It is technically a memory disorder (as well as a dissociative disorder), although the controversy behind it being a memory disorder should probably be noted. I beleive its still important to add (considering it has amnesia in the name), in addition the main symptoms of the disorder are associated with memory loss. If added dissociative fuge should be mentioned as well i beleive. VastV0idInSpace0 {have a great day!} (talk) 17:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  should dissociative amnesia be added?
Talk:Meningoencephalitis

message: I came to this article to learn the radiological appearance of this. Please add this information in if you have it. --Waqqashanafi (talk) 04:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radiology appearance? 

message: the diagnosis section isn't even complete sentences; needs some work. --Jeremyb (talk) 02:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  diagnosis section
Talk:Methylmalonic acidemias

message: I don't think that Methylmalonic acidemia is a disorder affecting branched-chain amino acids. It is a classical type of organic acidemia. A part of the introducing sentence was removed. patho (talk) 21:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Intermenstrual bleeding

message: What's the reference for that? The reference noted in (1: MedicineNet.com > Definition of Metrorrhagia Last Editorial Review: 3/17/2003) doesn't say this condition changed its name. Linuxo (talk) 13:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, found it in this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345435 Linuxo (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "previously known as metrorrhagia" 

message: "Intermenstrual bleeding" and "Breakthrough bleeding" are basically synonyms and can be dealt with together IMO. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Milk sickness

message: There is a classically Eurocentric error in the latter paragraph. Dr. Bixby did not, by the text presented, "discover" the cause of milk poisoning - it was told to her by another knowledgeable source. As is usual, an unnamed Native American source is not worthy of being considered the "discoverer" or even the source of cultural information - no, the white Dr. Bixby is the "discoverer." It is grimly amusing that the writer, whether in the original material or in the quote, laments that Bixby was never given proper credit. A more sophisticated writer should both verify the validity of this claim and recompose the content to reflect Dr. Bixby's role.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.98.245 (talk) 18:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It is difficult to penetrate the layers, as some of the article appears to be almost verbatim from "Dr. Anna, Anna Hobbs Bixby", at this site, prepared by Illinois libraries, it appears.
<http://www.alliancelibrarysystem.com/IllinoisWomen/files/lg/htm1/lg000003.html>  There were certainly earlier reliable sources than the 1996 Illinois History article by a high school student. It may never be possible to find the name of the Shawnee woman.Parkwells (talk) 15:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eurocentric bias 

message: In: 
It lists: "Snively, William D., Jr., and Louanna Furbee. 1956. Discovery of the cause of milk sickness. Journal of the American Medical Association 196: 1055-60." as a reference. The year should be 1966.Smallman12q (talk) 01:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing year error in source

message: Interesting name in light of the fact that Lincoln once said Gen. McClellan had "the slows".
100.15.127.199 (talk) 00:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the slows"
Talk:Mixed disorder of acid-base balance

message: It seems to me that Acid-base homeostasis should be the main article for this topic, and that acid-base imbalance should be merged into it, as well as much of mixed disorder of acid-base balance. If no one objects, I'll do it. I'm posting word on those pages and the The Doctor's Mess. - Draeco (talk) 04:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Draeco (talk) 16:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Mixed transcortical aphasia

message: Bibliography: 
Brookshire, R. (2007). Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders (8th ed., p. 199). St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby/Elsevier. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from https://books.google.com/books?id=wM9sBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA198&lpg=PA198&dq=mixed+transcortical+aphasia+causes&source=bl&ots=vXwHG_5df6&sig=kr6Y5-0uPY_m3NVzb-i4KzzmuqU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5hcPVcX1KIGUNqCFgbgP&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBjgK#v=onepage&q=mixed%20transcortical%20aphasia%20causes&f=false
LaPointe, L. (2005). Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders (3rd ed., p. 177). New York: Thieme. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from https://books.google.com/books?id=PgRbFxayeQwC&pg=PA181&lpg=PA181&dq=mixed+transcortical+aphasia+treatment&source=bl&ots=Gkne3iKW5l&sig=admOO5QSFdeKxDdP_4Dnw0-OQRk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TxkPVaDLGYPFggSjp4KQCQ&sqi=2&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBQ#v=snippet&q=mixed%20transcortical%20%20aphasia&f=false
Nussbaum, P. (1997). Handbook of neuropsychology and aging (p. 305). New York: Plenum Press. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from https://books.google.com/books?id=QxR6EaATaUwC&pg=PA545&lpg=PA545&dq=mixed+transcortical+aphasia+treatment&source=bl&ots=ZFBkweQ6H4&sig=sC9l8PqlvwJiz-HMrOt1Rag94Jo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RxoPVZz9LImlNsLng8gC&ved=0CEkQ6AEwCjgK#v=onepage&q=mixed%20transcortical%20aphasia%20treatment&f=false
Scott, S. (2000, February 9). Talk abotu different aphasic syndromes, and how different aspects relate to different neuroanatomical damage. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from http://www.psychol.ucl.ac.uk/sophie.scott/lecture_3.html
Sinanović, O., Mrkonjić, Z., Zukić, S., Vidović, M., & Imamović, K. (2011). Post-Stroke Language Disorders. Acta Clin Croat, 50, 79-94. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from http://www.google.com/urlsa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=25&ved=0CDMQFjAEOBQ&url=http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/115263&ei=EhsPVaG0CIKuggT3sYLQAQ&usg=AFQjCNF4vyDCi_yKcz3LVKy229dg7I6DLA&sig2=q_qLYzHkOWDoIDClDy-clw&bvm=bv.88528373,bs.1,d.eXY
Yavuzer G. 2010. Aphasia. In: JH Stone, M Blouin, editors. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation. Available online: http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/9/
Kaitev12 (talk) 19:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Myelophthisic anemia

message: Term not used in article. Since "pan-" means "everything", perhaps it means myelophthisis in the entirety of the body's bone marrow? Anyhow, please make this clear. 109.157.79.50 (talk) 23:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "panmyelophthisis" redirect here?
Talk:Nasal voice

message: Should I make a connection between the dysarthria page and this one?
Also, cerebral palsy often results in a nasal voice due to the (already mentioned)
velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cruise332 (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

message: The lead sentence currently is:
:A nasal voice is a type of speaking voice characterized by speech with a "nasal" quality to it.
This is self-referential and thus not helpful. The first or second sentence should state just what it is that characterizes a "nasal quality"—is it something about the pitch, or the combination of pitches, or what? Loraof (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead sentence 

message: Wouldn't it be helpful to have recordings of people speaking with "nasally" tones? I agree with the post above - there's really nothing in this article that actually explains what it is. Sound recordings would help at least demonstrate the topic. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 23:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples?
Talk:Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

message: Edited out a very outdated review, but kept the below as potential reference:
*Here's another:  -- Scray (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Resources to consider
Talk:Nodule (medicine)

message: Nodule is a medical term used by different fields to mean different things.  In dermatology, there is a strict definition of a nodule, which has nothing to do, for example, with the pulmonary definition of a nodule.  Therefore, I think, at least for dermatology, a specific nodule_(dermatology) page should be made, which I plan on doing.  I hope I am not stepping on any toes here, but I wanted to let people know what I was thinking/doing. Kilbad (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Making a specific "nodule_(dermatology)" page
Talk:Ochronosis

message: It is my understanding that these two are the same thing.  If so, why don't we merge them?  If not, please tell me how they are different.  Thanks, --Brendan19 (talk) 00:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge w/ alkaptonuria 

message: 172.5.154.148 (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology would be a good addition 
Talk:Oligospermia

message: Could someone update this page?  My Stedman's lists Oligospermia and Oligozoospermia as synonymous.  I would do this myself but, I have neither the time or the expertise at present.
Ibrmrn (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oligospermia and Oligozoospermia as synonymous

message: Why does the first sentence say that Oligospermia (in bold) is different of Oligozoospermia, and then talk only about the second? Kromsson (talk) 11:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed strange. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Organic brain syndrome

message: I am just not familiar enough with Wikipedia to be able to identify who undertook this article, but it is almost as if it would have been better not to write this shell of an article at all. QuintBy (talk) 03:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was created in January of 2006 by an author who is no longer with us. It has been improved upon by a number of bots and authors since then. Certainly there is always room for improvement by more learned colleagues. My first thought was that this article could be folded into a list of related items. I made a cursory search but did not find a comprehensive list of brain disorders. Ergo, until such time as one exists coincidentally to one having the time for such editing activities, I would suggest this is an excellent place to maintain the present information. JimScott (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

text: +1 174.21.156.80 (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Perturb

message: I believe that this article should not be subjected to deletion, because there are no other articles in Wikipedia.org that pertain to the definiton and information about the word "perterb" 
Thank you,
msteelman1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msteelman1 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 16 October 2007
::You should review Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary and direct your comments to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Perturb.  Toddstreat1 00:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion
Talk:Pachydermoperiostosis

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 