lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trinidad Express Newspapers

message: :Though considered one of the mainstream daily newspapers. The Trinidad & Tobago Express has been accused of being out of touch with the real issues affecting the grassroots population. Also that the majority of its' columnists have been accused of 'Armchair Journalism' in which the resident journals obtain their stories over the telephone from sources who may be deemed questionable. Many stories printed have been discredited as inaccurate or in extreme cases false by readers. Lack of Indepth Investigation is another complaint by readers.
I don't think this is suitable for the article, at least not in this form, without any sources.  Guettarda 00:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from article

message: Trinidad Express Newspapers does seem to be what the website calls itself these days, but the front-page nameplates I can see on the e-editions read Daily Express (no location given, at least not in large type) or Saturday Express or, presumably, Sunday Express. In running text on the website the editors use Trinidad Express. Wikipedia tends to use newspapers' Page 1 nameplate names as article names, rather than using the name at the top of the associated website. Trinidad Express or Daily Express (Trinidad) would be my suggestions but what saith consensus? ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 21:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Dance Dance Revolution Ultramix 3

message: Can someone update this article? It's already out in america - heck I just bought it yesterday. KirbyMeister 01:53, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One confirmed song is "Hey Mama" by the BEP... I'm not sure about the others. The info is all at DDRFreak. WestJet 14:11, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article update
Talk:Paul Marino

message: This article was written by Marino himself. I suggested to him on his talk page that he instead make a page on his group, the ILL CLan, and include a section on the team members.--DooMDrat 02:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As a note, the article has since been rewritten from scratch, as Marino has done significant work independent of the ILL Clan. — TKD::Talk 17:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography 

message: I don't know much about him myself...I loved I'm Still Seeing Breen, and I know he's one of the best Machinima figures out there, but for more specifics if someone wants to write more to this use his blog here: http://blog.machinima.org/--Katana314 21:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 
Talk:Jim Kerr

message: Corrected year of divorce to Chrissie Hynde and gave full name of daughter. Added details of second marriage to Patsy Kensit and of their son. --bUcKaRoO 02:03, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Careful: this information might get deleted any time, see the edit war on Chrissie Hynde. --89.247.125.22 (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrissie Hynde 

message: This article has now reached the ridiculous situation where two thirds of it is list cruft of set lists from individual concerts, none of which is cited from a reliable source.  This is far too much detail of trivial information.  Sure, we can list the concerts or tours, but every song performed at every gig??  I'm also not entirely sure that these lists aren't being used simply to link through to someone's Youtube account.  I propose removing these and replacing them with a summary of the tours.  Anyone disagree?  --Escape Orbit (Talk) 09:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see Ohconfucius has gone ahead and done this. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I will add my two cents that the setlist for every single concert is unnecessary.  Also unnecessary are the numerous youtube/video clips of songs being performed per WP:ELNEVER. Aspects (talk) 00:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Cruft 

message: I heard on BBC Radio 4 today (Saturday 25 August 2018) that Jim Kerr now runs a hotel in Sicily. If any one can find a reliable source for this, it could go in the article. Vorbee (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Hotel in Sicily
Talk:Pomacanthidae

message: I think some subheadings (ex. behavior, etc.) would benefit this article. --Bad carpet 02:25, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: The sweeping statement that “all angelfish are known to be protogynous hermaphrodites” has no references/citations, thus no credibility. Only a few species are known to be protogynous and to document this often requires a great deal of histological examination of gonads. Scott.vansant (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hermaphroditism
Talk:Pubarche

message: "SMR 2 - pubarche: the development of pubic hair. Occurring at a mean age of 11.6 years in females (range 9.3-13.9 years) and 12.6 years in males (range 10.7-14.5 years), this stage describes vellus hair - sparse, fine, straight, downy hair - over the labia or the base of the penis." (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/pubarche)
Excerpt from: Jonathan T. Avila: Normal Adolescent Growth and Development, Reference Module in Biomedical Sciences, Elsevier, 2021, ISBN 9780128012383, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818872-9.00011-X. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012818872900011X) -- 2A01:C23:6DFB:2200:A069:443E:FCBF:201E (talk) 10:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ainfante21 (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II

message: 1. Add a note about the fact that we don't have many secondary resources on the definition of pubarche;
2. Expand on the topic of premature pubarche and delayed pubarche and their treatments under additional headers (Pathology and Treatment);
3. Add more information about what pubarche is like in different sex; 
4. Change the wording to be more inclusive; 
5. Add references to medical jargon that need defining to general public readers. Zoegeng yourong0111 (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2023: Group Edit Goals

message: Lghad reviewed references #1-7: Reference #1 has no source date so the access date was used instead. Reference #2 was available on February 2023 - this was used for the source date. Reference #3 was formatted correctly. Reference #4 was edited to include the correct publication date of March 2020. Reference #5's source date was edited to April 2013. Reference #6 and #7 were formatted correctly. No predatory publishers or duplicate references were found. Lghad (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Changes

message: Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?
· The group made improved the article by adding more citations and references to expand on the information for the article. The article is very clear and organized with good citations. Keochui ucsf (talk) 18:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi! Thank you for your feedback, we definitely want to fix this...do you remember which references you came across? Lghad (talk) 22:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

text: An excerpt of this article is available on ScienceDirect. Written information came only from this excerpt. It can be found here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/pubarche.   Zoegeng yourong0111 (talk) 03:57, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundations II 2023: Group B (Anal Plug) Peer Review
Talk:Day of Resurrection/Archive 1

message: DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between January 19 and August 12.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to Talk:Foo/Archive02. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. freestylefrappe 02:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The barzakh, or life in the grave precedes the day of judgement and is not part of it. For this reason, it is off-topic for this article. The article is NOT about the afterlife. The afterlife includes several parts: life in the grave, the day of judgement and then life in paradise or hell. This article is only a survey of the Muslim narrative of the Day of Judgement, not an article about the afterlife in general. --Universaliss 14:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section on the barzakh does not belong in this article 

message: This section deals with events that precede the day of judgement and are outside the scope of the article, which is only a survey of the Muslim narrative of the Day of Judgement. --Universaliss 14:23, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mahdi and ad-Dajjal section is off topic for this article

message: The section on the dajjal does not belong in this article , but rather at the islamic eschatology article. 
There is no reference in any accounts we have of the day of judgement to the dajjal. 
Again this is a topic clearly for the eschatology article and not this article which is concerned only with the day of judgement. 
I would like to propose a vote to remove this section. Removing this section (or moving it to the eschatology page) is the proper thing in order to maintain the scope and respect the coherence of the qiyamah article. Any ideas how best to do this? --Universaliss 08:45, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dajjal section
Talk:Typhoon Rusa

message: More intro and impact. Jdorje 19:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Could someone provide a source for the name claim, preferbly one from Malaysia? I believe it is inaccurate. While rusa deer is a type of deer which possibly isn't even found in Malaysia, the word rusa in Malay is AFAIK more accurately translated as deer rather then a specific type of deer. Nil Einne 17:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Why enearth do you need two RSMC Tokyo reports?.Jason Rees (talk) 18:16, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the 2000 one. I had thought the onowther one didn't say the JMA was the RSMC, but instead of using the best track I ended up using the 2002 report. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  JMA 
Talk:Pacific Electric Building

message: I hastily wrote the info about the Pacific Electric Building. I don't have a source in front  of me that I can cite, but I currently live in the building, and have studied the rail line it once housed in school. I would consider what has been provided so far common knowledge with no source being neccesary. 
I deleted the part about current construction beacuse construction on the building has stopped. 65.125.163.221 05:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where the tale began that the P.E. Building was, on completion, the tallest skyscraper west of the Mississippi, but common knowledge or not, it's wrong. It wasn't even the tallest building in Los Angeles at the time. That honor went to the Continental Building at the southeast corner of 4th and Spring Streets, completed in 1904. In 1905, the tallest building west of the Mississippi may have been the 18 story Spreckels (AKA Call) Building in San Francisco, completed in 1898. In any case, by 1905, San Francisco was the site of many buildings taller than the Pacific Electric Building. Whyaduck 05:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pacific Electric Article
Talk:1167

message: I noticed that in 1176, a battle called Legnano was fought between the Lombards and Barbarossa.  This page claims that a battle called Legano was fought in 1167.  Based on the fact that it is the same combatants and same day of the year and the two names are one letter apart, I am wondering if this is a real battle or an error.  Does anyone know? Roy Al Blue 02:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Legano and Legnano: Two Battles or One?
Talk:Castroville, California

message: What the heck is the end of that first paragraph???
A.  The end of the first paragraph, the word is "United States."  Thanks for asking, any more questions?  Dana Payne  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanaPayne (talk • contribs) 19:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Template talk:Law & Order Franchise

message: I changed the template.  It looks better this way.--Kross | Talk 03:56, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: I added the new series "Conviction" to the list, even though it's not exactly a spinoff, it is however, part of the L&O universe, so it should be added, any thoughts?
I removed it.  Conviction was by very conscious intention not branded as an L&O show, so while it may belong in the L&O universe it is not a franchise show.  It should properly be placed in the 'related shows' subsection, and I have done so. Threephi 06:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. By being part of the L&O Universe, it is inherently part of the franchise. If nothing else, it should be listed with Exiled and Crime and Punishment. I would note that Crime and Punishment is much farther out than Conviction from the core L&O. 66.191.144.82 06:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added ''Conviction'' 

message: The placement of this template on the relavent pages seems to be rather random. I think we should move them all to be right under the infobox, (or if no infobox exists, at the top of the page).--SomeStranger (T | C) 01:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrary Placement? 

message: Wouldn't The X-Files be a related series since John Munch appeared in an episode of that series?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.57.176 (talk) 01:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The X-Files'' 

message: I must ask how Mike Post came to be listed as personnel. The guy wrote a (good) theme tune and some variations on it. I would say that "personnel" are people who work on the series/franchise on a programme-by-programme basis. I would like to see his name removed from thios template. Any thoughts? TINYMARK 06:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Post - Personnel?
Talk:Islam in the United States/Archive 1

message: DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
This archive page covers approximately the dates between November 8, 2004 and March 14, 2005.
Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are
replying to if necessary.
Please add new archivals to Talk:Islam in the United States/Archive02. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.) Thank you. Palm_Dogg 04:07, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Systemic lupus erythematosus

message: The page mentions SLE in +few instances. What is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.16.55.163 (talk • contribs) 
:Systematic lupus erythematosus.  It's actually defined in the second bullet in the medicine section.  WLU 02:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is SLE? 

message: This has to be one of the most useless main pages on Wikipedia. I have no idea where to start for general information on lupus. I hope someone can fix it up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.228.200.71 (talk) 23:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the Beef? 

message: Does anyone object to redirecting Lupus to systemic lupus erythematosus, and moving this page back to Lupus (disambiguation)? It seems very obvious that that's what should be done, as the page says it's the topic most commonly referred to as "lupus." I would do it now but I don't have time to clean it up, but I'll probably do it tomorrow. I'll also be removing the list of organizations, as it seems extremely improbable that someone looking for the organization "Lupus Foundation of America" would expect to find it under the title "Lupus." Propaniac (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a great idea.  Strong support.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move/redirect 
Talk:Dan Smoot

message: Aren't the sources indicated in this comment adequate if they are integrated into the article to delete the "sources" template at the top?
Rlquall 17:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Why is this here? As far as I can tell, none of the individuals listed in it is noteworthy, either in their own right or as part of what makes Dan Smoot noteworthy. I suggest deleting whole section, but I am willing to discuss the topic if anyone objects. Rks13 (talk) 23:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family section 
Talk:10GBASE-CX4

message: This article probably needs some rewriting by someone who understands it better than I do.
X2 pointed to a disambiguation page; however, it doesn't seem that there is a valid entry for the X2 connector as mentioned in the article.  The link has been removed for now.  The Hooded Man 23:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mein Leben

message: A list from the University of Michigan library (some are the same book, obviously):
*Mein Leben / Heinrich Harrer. 	2002 	
*Mein Leben / Marcel Reich-Ranicki. 	1999 	
*Mein Leben / Johann Gottfried Seume ; nebst der Fortsetzung von G.J. Göschen und C.A.H. Clodius ; herausgegeben von Jörg Drews. 	1991 	
*Mein Leben / Emil Nolde ; mit e. Nachw. von Martin Urban ; [hrsg. von d. Stiftung Seebüll Ada u. *Emil Nolde]. 	1976 	
*Mein Leben / Richard Wagner. 	1976 	
*Kokoschka, Oskar,  	Mein Leben. Vorwort und dokumentarische Mitarbeit von Remigius Netzer. 	1971 	
*Hahn, Otto,  	Mein Leben. 	1968 	
*Mein Leben / Alma Mahler-Werfel ; [Vorw. von Willy Haas]. 	1963 	
*Raeder, Erich,  	Mein Leben. 	1956 	
*Pagels, Albert,  	Mein leben. 	1940 	
*Sandrock, Adele,  	Mein leben, 	1940 	
*Dubnow, Simon,  	Mein leben, herausgegeben von dr. Elias Hurwicz. 	1937 	
*Hohlbaum, Robert,  	Mein leben. 	1936 	
*Huch, Rudolf,  	Mein leben. 	1935 	
*Busse, Hermann Eris,  	Mein leben. 	1935 	
*Griese, Friedrich,  	Mein leben; von der kraft der landschaft. 	1934 	
*Bode, Wilhelm von,  	Mein leben. 	1930 	
*Wagner, Richard,  	Mein Leben. Kritisch durchgesehen, eingeleitet und erläutert von Wilhelm Altmann. 	1923 	
*Koenigsberger, Leo,  	Mein leben. 	1919 	
*Seume, Johann Gottfried,  	Mein leben ... Ed. with an introduction and notes by J.H. Senger. 	1899 	
*Hoffmann von Fallersleben, August Heinrich,  	Mein leben. 	1868
—Chick Bowen 05:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More books

message: This article survived an AFD nomination because no consensus to delete was found. Johnleemk | Talk 12:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: "Including, but not limited to" is lawyer-speak and is unnecessary since "including" implies additional items already. --Unimath (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  including, but not limited to
Talk:Chad Bentz

message: I created a small stub article on Bentz, should I insert the code that indicates that it's a stub?  I'll have the article placed in the baseball player category as well.
JaredB 05:14, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Soviet passport

message: On 28 August 1974 the USSR Council of Ministers issued a new Statute of the Passport System in the USSR and new rules of propiska. The latter rules were in effect until 23 October 1995. This statute finally abolished the effective slavery of peasants. However the "blanket passportisation" was started only in 1976 and finished in 1981.
Is "slavery" really the appropriate term here? Kazak 08:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little harsh? 

message: The concept of an 'internal passport' derives from the Tsarist era, however this is not mentioned in the article. In the Soviet era, the 'passports' seem to be more ID documents - but their exact function is not clarified here.--Jack Upland 11:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passport? 

message: I seem to remember that it was possible for a young Soviet citizens to choose the nationality "Soviet" at some point of time, if they wanted. I think this was even clebrated as a sign of enlightened citizenship, as in a future communist society (the eschatological paradise of communism) all national differences would have disappeared in the way of common Soviet identity. Does anyone have better information on this? --MPorciusCato 08:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your memory isn't quite right.  While Soviet citizens did "select" their nationality when they received their internal passports at age 16, they didn't select nationality freely. The article accurately states what the options were.  If both of their parents belonged to a single nationality -- for example, if they were both Ukrainian -- the child could only choose that nationality (Ukrainian in this case) on his or her passport. Only if the parents belonged to different nationalities from one another did the child have a choice:  he or she could choose the nationality of either one of the parents. Special rules applied for orphans or children of unmarried mothers.~Mack2~ (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality in Soviet Union
Talk:2005 Parti Québécois leadership election

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:British Columbia Liberal Party leadership contest, 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 
Talk:Creekview High School (Carrollton, Texas)

message: Try adding titles to give some structureVictuallers 12:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norse Peak Wilderness

message: Significant portions of this article were copied from the USFS web page. This is permitted under my reading of Public_domain#No_legal_restriction_on_use as a work of the United States Government. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I felt that the article needed a picture so I uploaded one that I took. --Starladustangel 07:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Knob Hill Farms

message: This article's grammar is pretty poor and doesn't show the history of the company and its founders.    Anyone like to rewrite it?
I agree but i don't want to edit it.
----
I removed a dead link on the main page. It is shown below. Anyone want to try and find the picture now?
Knob Hills Farms famous waterfall
Qole 05:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The advertising jingle said "You know you get good value when you shop at Knob Hill Farms", did it not?  Not "your value", as the article currently reads.  What do others remember?  And, most importantly, can anyone find reliable sources?  — Richwales (talk) 18:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jingle
Talk:Mers El Kébir

message: Shouldn't this be "sank the French fleet"?
:No. Few of the ships were actually sunk. Badgerpatrol 02:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sunk boats 

message: How on earth can 0 m becom 3 ft?? Who needs the height in feet anyway? Why isn't the conversion made automatically?  Chtito (talk) 09:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height in feet 

message: What is exact French pronunciation? Please add IPA. Propatriamori (talk) 11:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation