lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Visionary

message: Is this even possible? I mean you could tell someone when the next eclipse will be, or when the next holiday will be, but that's based on past patterns and traditions, you can't predict things like what the next winning lottery numbers will be, or the next earthquake and where, etc. It should be clarified what this means, exactly. The snare (talk) 03:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: One who can envision the future

message: * Martin Luther King Jr.
* Wright Brothers
* Sigmund Freud
* Albert Einstein
* Karl Marx
----
Iainscott 11:01, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-05-6 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Matthew Ridgway

message: Article mentions he was wounded but no purple heart listed in awards. Article has category purple heart recipients. --Brad (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purple Heart 

message: this guy needs more info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.214.129.48 (talk) 22:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi 

message: Given his high rank in Nato he must have been awarded several grand-crosses in European orders such as the Order of Orange-Nassau. Who knows more?  Faithfully yours, Robert Prummel (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decorations 

message: When General Matthew Ridgway arrived in Paris to take up his position in NATO there were demonstrations, organized by the communists who called him "Ridgway la peste". There was one dead and several people were wounded. The communists had accused him of using biological weapons in Korea. All this may very well be communist desinformation. Who knows more? Robert Prummel (talk) 14:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biological warfare 

message: Some well-meaning contributor has added garbled text to the end of the "Legacy" section of the article, possibly translated word-for-word from the Japanese. Its meaning is not clear.
Jperrylsu (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Legacy

message: The column at the right never mentions that he was the 2st Supreme Allied Commander of Europe (after Eisenhower).2601:2C1:C003:EF7A:6DA9:E91D:1F34:8B46 (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Position 

message: This article states that's ridgeway took command during the Chinese advance.
It was the North Korean advance; as the Chinese had not entered the war at this point. Fyi Jeffcrenshaw1 (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple mistake 

message: The article, along with its citations, seems to use both Ridgway and Ridgeway, sometimes interchangeably. I guess that a short comment would be appropriate. 37.190.154.25 (talk) 23:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out those typos; I fixed them. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Forestation

message: Is this a hoax?
I have removed, this:
Forestation is a form of hair transplant that takes hair follicles from the scalp and transplants them to the pubic region. The procedure is performed primarily on females and is most popular in South Korea, where pubic hair is traditionally regarded as a sign of fertility.
Until someone confirms, it. It sounds so ridiculous it might actually be true. I have changed Forestation a simple dictionary definition of what it actually means; a dense growth of trees and plants.
I did a Google search on this. I only read a few mentions, but from what I can tell, forestation is "the latest trend". Supposedly it makes the pubic hair area extra extra shaggy! Jaberwocky6669 July 2, 2005 04:38 (UTC)
LOL, this isn't right. Check out Dictionary.Com. I've fixed the actual term. Imper1um 19:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I have redirected the page to afforestation, which is the more common term.  Guettarda (talk) 17:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: It may make these topics more clear to flesh out this page with objectives, benefits and criticisms that are common to both afforestation and reforestation. Some of the debate on those two pages reflects the difficulty of classifying projects. CarbonBotany (talk) 19:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization of forestation re: reforestation and afforestation
Talk:Villers Abbey

message: How can the abbey be discussed separately from the town that grew up around it? If you break information into small enough parts, nothing makes sense. Sounds like the monks just wandered away during the Revolution. Wetman 12:40, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the history of the town and that of the abbey are quite "intermixed". I will write the full article about the abbey (architecture, history, present activities and events,... this can take a little time) and then we can discuss the opportunity of merging the two articles. What do you think? Dom 15:34, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the United States

message: Oh dear, and I spent so long working on the Ambassadors from the United Kingdom to the United States of America page, only to come across this one. What's a poor drudge to do? --Mr impossible 12:54, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If a Republic can not have an ambassador, what happened in 1893? 77.69.34.203 (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Republic
Talk:Brisance

message: I made a note that the link was dead, rather than removing it, since it still should be here to give credit; the page is now inaccessible due to new security rules. -FZ 13:32, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link

message: A bit confused about this sentence: Brisance values are primarily employed in France and Russia.  Does this mean that other countries don't use brisance as a measure? Do they use something else? Limbo socrates 15:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brisance values

message: While I don't know specifically, it seems like there should be a relatively easy way to simply measure the pressure of the shockwave, and the time after detonation said shock wave arrives at a point (i.e. sensor) a short distance away from the explosion.  My bet is you would use piezo electrics or very fast data collection rate strain gages...  While I am sure that a number of emperical tests such as the sand test are used, there is no doubt a very scientific method that scientists, rather than army personnel use...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.210.17.11 (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: We fired a brisant grenade once, don't remember how to write it really. It was basically a rpg which penetrated say a tank's hull and exploded inside the tank. Fired it with a Carl G. Perhaps stuff for the article, ciao Mallerd (talk) 23:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explosive 

message: Please would someone amplify this term? It seems to be left hanging, as if its meaning were well-known.
JBel (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shock resonance? 

message: The article mentions "the sand crush test" but doesn't define it. It should. -- Dan Griscom (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sand crush test"? 

message: I corrected many technical errors. Brisance is a property solely of (detonating) high explosives, not gun propellants, which are intended not to detonate but to burn or deflagrate. If a gun propellant should detonate (which might happen under some perhaps extreme circumstance), you got a big problem!--MajorHazard (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Heterophobic

message: Dic def, non-notable and/or neologism. One of three dic defs recently contributed by an anon. OK, so given knowledge of latin roots and whatnot, people can create "valid" words. However, m-w.com doesn't consider it a word, nor does my dead tree dic. Gets less than 3000 hits. Only one of the three that might be a Wiktionary candidate, but I'm not sure it should be sent there, as it doesn't even seem particularly accurate: m-w.com def of "-phobia" is "an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation"--no mention of prejudice. Niteowlneils 14:37, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  From VfD:
Talk:Concatenative programming language

message: This doesn't appear to be a term with significant usage outside of wikipedia, and also is very poorly defined here. Should this be deleted?
*Manfred von Thun keeps referring as "concatenative" to those languages that he includes in a class with Joy. There is also a discussion group dealing with Joy and related topics. To browse previous messages, or to join the group, see  yahoo group: concatenative These messages can be read without joining the group. There have been 1116 contributions in the first two years, 1-MAY-2000 to 1-MAY-2002.   Perhaps there is a better (i.e., more standard way of referring to this class of languages? If you do know of one, it would probably make sense to change the name. — danakil 01:12, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)
* Charles Moore didn't invent the name, but sure invented the concept. However, the only name he ever gave it was Forth. Although a long term Forth user (over 30 years), I have no problem with finally having a name for a class of programming languages that was previously unnamed. Mdfischer 23:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The article says "or stack-based", but the category lists languages that aren's stack-based. I see some contradiction in this. --Stesch 13:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicting information 

message: I'm university level CompSci engineer, but don't understand this article because the terms are not back-referenced. For example "terms" is meaningless without either back-referencing the term "term" to one other programming or mathematical paradigm, such as logic programming or imperative. The article just seems to mumble its mind without any listeners. I think it is not understandable to anyone except anyone that already knows all about the topic. The terms must be better founded into a context. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've attempted to clarify things somewhat by explaining concatenative languages as the subset of point-free languages in which concatenation of expressions (which should be clearer than "terms") denotes function composition. If you do not think this improves things sufficiently, please reinstate the technical notice. John Nowak (talk) 03:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomprehensible
Template talk:Jewish life

message: What is a "Wimpel"? - SF2K1 
:It's nonsense that someone put in, I have removed it now. IZAK 10:10, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  actually, its a real thing.  I drafted an entry for it on my Page Rabbi-m 04:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wimpel

message: Beautiful! JFW | T@lk 14:41, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Beautiful

message: Zeved habat page is created, and (non-red) link added to the template. -- Olve 22:12, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Zeved habat

message: This template has evolved beyond its name. It should be renamed (e.g. Judaism topics). JFW | T@lk 20:10, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename template to Judaism topics

message: It seems a little odd that Talmud study forwards to Daf Yomi. Perhaps a mention of Daf Yomi on the Torah study page would suffice? Jfr26 19:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talmud study 

message: I have removed Menorah since it was an item used in the temple, (not a Chanukkiyah what we light on channucha).  It is not part of modern Jewish life.  It would make as much sence to put the Urim and Thummim or Ark of the Covenant.  Jon513 02:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Menorah]] 

message: Why is get is quotes?  perhaps italics would make more sence. Jon513 13:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "get"

message: Should we perhaps rename this to Jewish Life Cycle? It seems, IMHO, that "Jewish life" may be too broad a term to what this template includes, namely customs and ritual objects relating to life-cyclical events. --Valley2city₪‽ 06:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jewish Life Cycle"? 

message: Don't you think the template on Jewish life should also include symbol ? ←Humus sapiens ну? 23:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chai 

message: I removed the "culture" section from the template because "Diaspora" and the Holocaust are not part of the Jewish life cycle, and are not similar to any of the other sections. It's a classic case of "Which one of these sections is not like the others?" Having irrelevant or loosely relevant items detracts from the overall usefulness of the template. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 01:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed a section 

message: There has been a slight dispute over whether to include Adult bar and bat mitzvah on this template. Personally, I feel it belongs. It is just like a regular bar/bat mitzvah, except it has become a distinct concept of its own that is, yes, a part of Jewish life. Xyz7890 (talk) 02:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion is not here but at Wikipedia_talk:JUDAISM#Adult_Bar_and_Bat_Mitzvah, and consensus is this should not be here. By the way, contrary to what Xyz7890 said in his editsummary it is not the revert that is bold, but the addition (seeWP:BRD). Debresser (talk) 12:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Adult bar and bat mitzvah" - include or not?
Talk:RSA-250

message: Matt, Regarding your edit note, I think the answer is yes. The topic is interesting, of crytanalytic (and mathematical and computational) interest and if covered well, perhaps too much to include in RSA. I doubt there is need for separate articles on each of the numbers, however. Does this give an answer to the question you posed? 
: Ah, the question was rather about a :Category:Cryptographic challenges, not about articles on individual numbers. There might be a case for merging all the RSA-xxx articles, though, into RSA numbers.
Indeed, there might be reason (cryptanalytic mostly) to have an article on 'cracking projects' (this, MD5, Squeamish Ossifrage, ...). What think you? Anyone else? ww 14:51, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps; alternatively, putting sections in brute force attack and/or distributed computing might also suffice. — Matt 19:47, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: RSA challenge numbers
Talk:Gimje

message: It says Gimje is the only one region where Koreans can see horizon in landlocked area. The only area in that province perhaps?  The nation has the ocean all around it, so its not a landlocked nation.  Dream Focus 21:32, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean? Gimje is the only one region where Koreans can see horizon in landlocked area. 

message: I can't find a citation for this, but it is well declared in Korea that during occupation, the emperor of Japan insisted on Kimje rice for his meals.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joel.sbateman (talk • contribs) 22:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting facts?
Talk:Barbara Hepworth Museum

message: Just came to this page during a search on Barbara Hepworth and noted that a valiant effort had been made, but the subjective, first-person prose was completely at odds with Wikipedia style.
Sorry if the editing was rather brutal, but this page does need work and the best way to proceed is probably to discuss it here and work together on making it into a useful resource.
:I fully agree and support this approach. Good work! - Chris Jefferies 17:05, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's no mention of the name Trewyn Studio at this time -- Rodge500 18:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I wrote the original and I think its a great edit!  Thanks for quoting me about the stones... (talljim)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.72.184.251 (talk) 12:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Sorting

message: The main purpose of sorting information is to optimise its usefulness for specific tasks. In general, there are two ways of sorting information: by category e.g. a shopping catalogue where items are grouped together under headings such as 'home', 'sport & leisure', 'women's clothes' etc. and in a hierarchy according to some property e.g. from cheapest to most expensive.
They are not likely to be in a hierarchy, rather, they may be in a linear sequence, perhaps of several sorts.
Apogr 15:45, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorting information

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Sortkey. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 26#Sortkey until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sortkey" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Sorting the process of group or classing according to quality species 112.198.165.95 (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TLE 

message: What i ascending 2A03:2880:31FF:78:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ascending
Talk:Muan County

message: There are two Taizhous in China (Taizhou, Jiangsu and Taizhou, Zhejiang).  Can someone figure out which one it is and disambiguate it?  --Nlu (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dab on Taizhou 
Talk:Sinan County, South Jeolla

message: I believe that Sinan and Granbury, TX, in the United States have recently entered into a sister city relationship.  Can anyone verify whether or not this sisterhood is official or not?
:All I can find are some references to a study on Granbury done by the local Sinan office of education.  Maybe it's a partnership between the educational systems, rather than the governments?  -- Visviva 06:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister Cities
Talk:Goheung County

message: Not sure where you got the 10,000 population figure.  Naver puts it at over 84,000.  I'm going to make the change.  SolitaryThrush (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I got that figure from Naver: http://100.naver.com/100.nhn?docid=15006   Whenever somebody typed in 10,000-something, they were probably quoting Goheung-eup, not Goheung-gun.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SolitaryThrush (talk • contribs) 16:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:Suspension bondage

message: Results of deletion discussion:
Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Suspension bondage.
DJ Clayworth 16:17, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Here is the Safety section that I replaced with a Dangers section:
* avoid suspension from a single limb;
* refrain from attaching the neck to any bondage, due to the likelihood of death by hanging or slow asphyxiation;
* refrain from using handcuffs to suspend a person in any way, since they could cut into the limbs, their nerves and blood vessels, causing serious and permanent damage; specially made suspension cuffs are preferred;
* for full suspension, to tie the supports to as many limbs as possible, and the body, to avoid danger of asphyxiation, blood being unable to reach the limbs, or anything else;
* and never to leave the person alone for more than a very short time.
Some of this advice strikes me as dubious at best and I don't think Wikipedia should be in the business of giving out how to or even how not to advice
on a high risk activity. Pretzelpaws 05:03, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety 
Talk:Key generation

message: A note from the author who created the text originally:
UPDATE REQUIRED by someone with more knowlege ;)
Knowledge is a limited resource :).
Why is system entropie better, better than what? 134.58.253.113 16:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

message: * Key generation is the process of generating keys for cryptography.
* In some cases keys are randomly generated using a random number generator (RNG) or pseudorandom number generator (PRNG).
* In other situations, the key is created using a passphrase and a key generation algorithm, usually involving a cryptographic hash function such as SHA-1.
These are the only lines I find in the article that refer to key generation. Are keys for different encryption schemes generated differently; e.g., symmetric vs asymmetric, public vs private?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.231.83.64 (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, key generation depends on the cryptosystem. For example, the key generation for RSA involves finding large prime numbers. The description is in the article about the RSA cryptosystem. Generally, it makes sense to describe special case key generation algorithms in the corresponding article and not here. 2A02:120B:2C71:9BD0:859A:A678:E678:D6F3 (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generation
Category talk:Former countries

message: There are some awfully contentious inclusions in this category. Many of these are merely extinct regimes, but existing countries. For example, there are several terms here that refer to past constitutional arrangements of France and Spain. It seems to me we should distinguish between former regimes and former countries. -- Jmabel 17:43, Aug 25, 2004 (UTC)
Yes as I was going to say. Zaire is the D.R. of Congo, North Vietnam is Vietnam, Yugoslavia=Serbia, Spanish State=Spain, etc etc. Vital Component--
: Perhaps it should be moved to "former states"? The same thing struck me reading it. Palmiro 18:37, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Why is the Republic of Ragusta listed under 'd'?
* Probably for Dubrovnik, the modern name of Ragusa. -- Jmabel | Talk 22:26, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
** Sho'nuff. I've now changed it, but won't be surprised if I'm reverted. I'm not putting the article on my watchlist, so if anyone cares, I suggest you watchlist Republic of Ragusa. -- Jmabel | Talk 22:35, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
-----
This website is good for this topic.

Cwolfsheep 18:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??
Talk:Psi Upsilon Zeta Chapter

message: For those wondering why this isn't vfd-ed like some other Dartmouth groupss, I'd say "the first fraternity at Dartmouth College" and the Rockefeller connection push this into the notable-enough-for-an-article category. (I assume it is Nelson, by the way; the writer just had "vice president Rockefeller") - DavidWBrooks 17:46, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Electrodynamic suspension

message: EDS systems get affected easily by snow, ice or severe cold because EDS systems need ground coils.
(ground coils are the weakest points)
58.138.45.196 (talk) 05:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means, find a reliable source for that assertion, and add it to the article. Tim PF (talk) 07:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disadvantages of EDS 

message: Regarding this edit: it is probably correct but who was it who actually added "" this article? Please reply. Also what do you mean in the edit summary by "his article" please learn about ownership - you may, by all means refer to "his edit" but not to "his article". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure who added the link. Levitation melting can, however, be performed by any levitation method. Aerodynamic levitation, electrostatic levitation or electromagnetic levitation, for example, are all very commonly used as containlerless methods for melting and measuring the structure and properties of liquid matter. I think it's quite clear that the whole concept of different levitation methods and the method of levitation melting needs general cleanup and clarification. Polyamorph (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Since it was only a stub, I have now mergeed Electromagnetic levitation into a section in Levitation, with correct attribution.Polyamorph (talk) 10:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution 

message: These EDS maglev trains have disadvantage that it produces magnetic field that can effect the electromagnetic waves produced by phones, radio, and other electronic devices. Puspalmanna23107A (talk) 03:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  disadventages of EDS maglev trains 

message: http://www.deboeij.com/docs/TransMag_deboeij_control_3dof_maglev.pdf
This reference does not work anymore! 185.45.118.2 (talk) 14:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference no longer works