lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Districts of the Turks and Caicos Islands

message: Given that there are already Wikipedia pages for various of the Turks and Caicos Islands elections should the details of the 2016 election be removed from here and links to the several elections pages be added? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking the page
Talk:Chaparral High School (Colorado)

message: more topics and pics, but good start. just. welcomeVictuallers 16:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The current principal is Ron Peterson.
Source:
http://www.dcsdk12.org/portal/page/portal/DCSD/Schools/High_Schools/Chaparral_High_School
http://schools.dcsdk12.org/education/components/scdirectory/default.php?sectiondetailid=115881&showdir=4264
Does anyone have a dispute with that claim? My edits are being changed.
Thanks, MWOAP (talk) 16:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal 
Talk:Max Mara

message: Max Mara sells upscale ready-to-wear, not "haute couture," which necessarily implies "custom-fitted."  I've bought MM clothes in Italy, not simply the U.S., and there are no Max Mara couturiers.  I'm removing the "haute couture" description.68.72.106.147 22:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Haute Couture?

message: I am not sure whether the issue "boycott" is really encyclopedic in content and scope. Any opinion?--Broletto (talk) 10:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boycott 

message: Currently, according to Max Mara Group site, brands are 23, not 35. --Dejudicibus (talk) 13:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brands 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://wwd.com/fashion-news/designer-luxury/sportmax-celebrates-50th-anniversary-with-capsule-book-1203389029/, https://wwd.com/business-news/marketing-promotion/the-quiet-approach-5260170/ etc. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fiorucci

message: I cleaned up the article a little bit by removing some of the subjective terms and getting rid of the unnecessary sentences that affected the tone of the article. Also, I moved the image of the Fiorucci box down near the Style section, where it was first referenced. Lenore Schwartz 14:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup POV

message: As indicated above, the article was a bit of a mess so I've completely rewritten it.  May be a bit "dry" at the moment, but there's a pretty good framework there, and at least it's all pretty well referenced by WP:RS, even if NYT fashion articles in particular don't check their facts as well as they should. :-( I think I've sorted out the corporate stuff fairly well, although sources do get a bit confused on the matter, and I've not found anything about the Montedison relationship - you can imagine that they might have taken a minority stake in '74, and then taken it up to 50% for the big push on the USA.  And reliable financial information seems pretty hard to come by, it would be nice to measure their success in the 80's. Also the current relationship between Elio and Edwin is not that clear to me, the NYT article implies he was in full creative control in 2001, but Love Therapy and the H&M case suggests that the relationship has now cooled? It's also not clear exactly what went wrong with the Carrera deal - did they just get cold feet about the legal case?  Anyway, the article is crying out for some pictures - logos, merchandise etc but it can't be far off GA otherwise. FlagSteward (talk) 01:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Fiorucci is name-checked in a derogatory way… describing a misfit punk's style as "used Fiorucci." Nicoleropp (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Psycho
Talk:Angelo Litrico

message: C&A has been selling streetwear/casual clothing from the Angelo Litrico label for young men since ages. Why isn't this mentioned here? 85.5.76.80 (talk) 09:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C&A?

message: Why is the reference to the shoe-banging incident at the end of the article? I did not found anything at that page that would be relevant here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.134.205.83 (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoe-banging incident
Talk:Planishing

message: There is a minor typo:  planishing stake that is held in a Italic textviceItalic text or a mounting hole 
The correct word is "vise".
Daveg703 (talk) 03:19, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vice/Vise

message: The stake shown in the picture is not the correct profile, it is too small and too high a crown. Something like a comma shaped dolly would be correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.41.28 (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stake
Talk:The Conformist (1970 film)

message: I've seen this film multiple times on television in the UK and it's always shown under it's French name (Le Conformiste) and I've seen it refered to on art and culture type shows under the french name. Does any one know any more about this or why? Is this a different version than the USA version (It's always shown in Italian/French with English subtitles)(Morcus (talk) 19:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Broadcasts
Talk:Flora MacKenzie

message: News article at https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/black-sheep/story/2018758055/madam-the-story-of-flora-mackenzie which includes podcast with more information and refers also to:
* book Naked Truth
* interview https://www.ngataonga.org.nz/collections/catalogue/catalogue-item?record_id=797413
* Metro interview with Alec Leyland (police acquaintance)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.195.165 (talk) 05:00, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source(s)
Talk:Eckington, Derbyshire

message: Good as the map is, it's probably not right for a village in Derbyshire I think. --VinceBowdren 16:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Yorkshire map 

message: There must be more of significance about Eckington than just the schools, which currently make up a significant proportion of article. History, Economy, past growth of the village to small town ?
Added to WP Derbyshire, to bring to more peoples attention.BulldozerD11 (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion

message: Cannot be in the main text... but you could put them in the gallery?? Victuallers (talk) 13:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: the geograph links

message: The category has been added to this article, however the article is written about the town not the parish (which also includes the settlements of Marsh Lane, Renishaw, Derbyshire, Spinkhill, Ridgeway and Troway. PoisonedPigeon (talk) 09:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parish of Eckington 
Talk:Dow Village, Couva–Tabaquite–Talparo

message: I undid the undiscussed move of this page to Dow Village, Couva-Tabaquite-Talparo. If it's the official name, we'd need a source. If it's just for disambiguation purposes, the simpler name is preferable, per WP:AT. Guettarda (talk) 12:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Dow Village, California. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 23#Dow Village, California until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Bearcat (talk) 11:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dow Village, California" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1999 in American television

message: It's really unclear what the list of television shows by decade is supposed to express?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.108.9 (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Didn't Friday Night Smakckdown start in September? I'm only saying this because I think they had their anerversery in September one year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.253.96.153 (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friday Night Smakckdown
Talk:Dunn's River Falls

message: There was an old sentence on the page, hiding below one of the post-reference templates, contradicting the earlier article claim that Dunn's River Falls was used in Dr. No.  The article has sources that say DRF *was* the falls, and sources that do not contradict this saying that Laughing Waters Beach was used for the bikini scene, but I haven't seen sources that claim that Dunn's River Falls wasn't used as a location in Dr. No.   Moreover, the waterfall shown in the background in the scene starting with Honey saying "You smell nice already." has a reasonable resemblance to Google Images of Dunn's River Falls, e.g. .  So, until we have other sources, I think we have to go with "DRF is shown in the movie.", but sources are always welcome, of course.  --j⚛e deckertalk 22:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. No 

message: This page is absolutely horrible. The citations for this page are from a premium-member only geocaching site and the attraction's site itself. On a more personal level, I went there and the entire thing was smooth concrete, what a shithole.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.40.145 (talk) 17:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolutely Horrible 

message: The falls were also used for location footage in the first James Bond film Dr. No in 1962, where Bond (played by Sean Connery) and Honey Ryder (Ursula Andress) in the river.
This sentence needs a verb.  What did Bond and Honey Ryder do in the river? Michael1115 (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Verb 
Talk:Online Film Critics Society

message: I am disinclined to remove or edit this without some discussion, but the statement strikes me as faulty so long as people like Cynthia Fuchs and Susan Granger are marquee members of the group. Might a slight hedge be appropriate, "...comprised almost entirely of people who publish their reviews exclusively or primarily on the Internet"? Editor Emeritus 16:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "exclusively or primarily on the Internet"

message: It seems odd to have an encyclopedic article on the OFCS without so much as a mention of Harvey Karten. It seems he is no longer a member of the group, but wasn't he one of the founders back in the 1990s? Any insight from current members would be appreciated... Editor Emeritus 16:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harvey Karten

message: Some highly subjective and blatantly self-promoting verbiage has been dropped here by a one-time OFCS writer with no present connections to the organization; those contributions were removed.  The purpose of this page is not to promote individual writers (especially those with no current connection to the OFCS), but to simply acknowledge the OFCS as the global professional association for Net-based film journalists. Ecoleetage 15:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sticking with the facts
Talk:Vishal

message: hi
122.168.42.156 (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Am I? 

message: I'm pretty certain this should be a disambiguation page and have marked it as such because of the number of links to dispare uses and the content is a list of diferent uses. Not sure how to clean it up properly and not anywhere near my fields of expertise, could someone better at this clean up please. Thanks Dmcq (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiuguation page
Talk:1993 Formula One World Championship

message: 'Williamses', as opposed to simply, the 'Williams cars' or similar, hardly makes for an appropriate encyclopedia term, surely. And wasn't that final victory by Senna the occasion on which McLaren surpassed Ferrari to become the most successful team in their own right, by dint of individual grand prix wins, in the history of the Championship? I could've sworn I read that on a website or in a Senna biography somewhere? If so, does anyone know of the source? MRacer (talk) 18:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned on page 242 of Autocourse 1993-94: "It [the 1993 Australian Grand Prix] was also the 104th GP victory for McLaren ... surpassing Ferrari's long-standing record." DH85868993 (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: McLaren surpassed Ferrari

message: Article says "Riccardo Patrese, who was released by Williams after just over five seasons with the team, despite having finished runner up to Mansell in the Drivers' Championship in 1992." This isn't true, but I don't have the sources at hand. Will fix soon. He signed with Benetton and then Williams tried to re-sign him. ColinClark (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Patrese and Williams

message: when i saw the entry list, i saw McLaren used two engine, the Ford HBE7 3.5 V8 and the Ford HBA8 3.5 V8. however, no one has mentioned that which specific race (round number) used which model of engine, could anyone reply to this message or directly editing the entry list about the round numbers for which engine model that McLaren used in this season? 223.19.112.230 (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We typically don't include that level of detail in season summary articles. DH85868993 (talk) 08:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  about McLaren using two engine models
Talk:Alessi (Italian company)

message: Name 3 famous alessi products(what are they)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.150.177.9 (talk) 13:31, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  alberto alessi
Talk:Valencian Community/Archive 4

message: :After a quite extensive search throughtout the whole internet, I haven't been able to find any single source to state that this flag has 1:2 proportions. No laws, no estatutes, no decrees... nothing. I have to say, that I ALMOST couldn't find anything to state it is 2:3 either... Only the source I gave some weeks ago, and that "some users" didn't believe... BUT, then, I thought about where to adress to ask for a confirmed source. And what better choice than the Spanish Vexillological Society (the SEV, see []) which, BTW is a member of the Fédération internationale des associations vexillologiques. So, I believe this source to be the most trustworthy of all.
:This said, I went to SEV site, [], and found a "banderas" (flags) link on the left. Then, I clicked on the "Comunidades Autónomas" link, see [], and then on the "Comunidad Valenciana/Comunitat Valenciana" one see [], to get here: [], where it clearly states a proportions of 2:3.
:But, maybe this society simply had these same proportions for all spanish autonomous communities flags... WRONG! let's see some examples:
#CASTILLA Y LEÓN: proportions 76:99. See, []
#CASTILLA-LA MANCHA: proportions 1:2. See, []
#COMUNIDAD DE MADRID: proportions 7:11. See, []
#PAÍS VASCO/EUSKADI: proportions 14:25. See, []
:Being ALL OTHERS of proportions 2:3.
:I sincerely hope this FINALLY ends the fight about the proportions. I gave the most trustworthy source available, which NO ONE can doubt. Let's then, please, change the actual flag in wikipedia, which is wrong.
--Maurice27 21:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no official ratio, therefore both 2:3 and 1:2, from which we can find examples over official buildings, are both equaly correct. Therefore, I think both could fit in the article. But I think, in this article (but not sure, the history of the page is quite long) that 1:2 was before 2:3 and I see no justification for the change.--Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 11:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proportions of the Valencian autonomous community Flag

message: I think a brief summary of the evolution of the different denominations (names) of the Valencian Community should be included as the first subsection of the article (whether it be named "Etymology of Valencia", or simply "Names of Valencia"). This subsection can then link to the specific article Names of the Valencian Community, a translation I've made (per request) of :ca:Denominacions del País Valencià. --the Dúnadan 17:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Extended article
Talk:Kinechromatic art

message: This article (Kinechromatic art) should stand alone, because it is about two dimensional art. Kinetic art and Kinetic sculpture should be merged because they are both about three dimensional art. Bus stop 17:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On further reading, Kinechromatic does seem quite different than the usual concept of kinetic art/sculpture. Though Kinetic art tries to touch on 2D aspects with "...or implied, as in the Op art paintings of Bridget Riley and others." We could add Kinechomatic to that sentence. --sparkitTALK 17:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion

message: I've reverted the PROD here. I agree that sources are very weak, although there is one on Palatnik already here.
Part of the problem is that 'Kinechromatic art' was a neologism in the 1950s, so work under that precise title is probably limited to Palatnik. However Frank Malina was working in a very similar genre at the same time, but calling them Lumidynes (sometimes given as 'Lumedyne', although I'm sure an engineer like Malina would have use the Lumi- base). Takis is another contemporary who worked with similar techniques, although better known for his magnetic works. 
It's possible that we end up renaming (or merging) this article and broadening the scope of what (or at least who) is covered here. However I'm convinced that there was a genre of 'kinechromatic' art happening in the post war decades, using similar techniques, by a number of independent artists. That's worth covering.
In passing I note that the Palatnik ref comes from Leonardo online. Is this the same Leonardo that was founded 60-ish years ago by Malina? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  rm prod
Talk:Monsignor Donovan Catholic High School

message: welcomeVictuallers 17:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:UEFA Pro Licence in England

message: Is there an article about UEFA Pro License, not specific to England? Because, AFAIK it's required in Russia too, and probably elsewhere.  Grue  17:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The license itself 

message: According to various articles in the news recently (including this one: , Avram Grant doesn't have a UEFA Pro License, yet this article lists him as someone who was given one for 10 years experience.
Should his name be taken off now?
Gopez 20:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avram Grant 

message: This article currently states he qualified in both 2004 and 2005, which is it?
btw the names from the 2007 section came from here --Mas 18 dl 20:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve McClaren 

message: UEFA Pro Licence applies to all countries in UEFA and e.g. every team playing in Champions League is required to have a couch with this licen.
Thus there is a need for more generic article about UEFA Pro Licence - not just from English perspective.
Similarly also Coaches with UEFA Pro Licence category should target to include all coaches.
However, before starting to do anything further, should we first decide how articles should be organised?
Perhaps one article discussing about UEFA Pro Licence itself and then other articles discussing UEFA Pro Licence in particular country: who are required to have it, what exceptions there are and last but not least list of coaches who have the licence. 
Then the category could consist of articles "UEFA Pro Licence holders in country XXX" (or subcategories, but I that would be bit dublicating work.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.124.218 (talk) 18:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  UEFA Pro Licence 

message: I've reworked the UEFA Pro Licence article to contain the detail that was in here, and split the lists to a new article. Please continue discussion on the appropriate talk pages. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Thomas Pitt

message: So was Mrs. Pitt an "Anglo-Indian" in the sense that she was an English person who was born and lived her life mostly in India, or was she partly of Indian ancestry?  If would be interesting if the two William Pitts were of East Indian descent through her. Cranston Lamont (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglo-Indian? 

message: Noting the Dorset connection, was he any relation to the Pitts who were MP's in the 17th century? Valetude (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The earlier Pitt MP's?
Talk:Cdb (software)

message: CDB is definitely "notable."  It's a software product that is used widely and has bindings for many programming languages.  It should probably be merged with Constant_Data_Base. ErikHaugen 17:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says: "Notably, the creator of cdb does not intend for cdb to be used as a shared library."
I can't find a reference to this, and find it very unlikely.  Also, there exists a debian package: "libcdb1 - shared library for constant databases (cdb)"
Can somebody clarify this?  It's possible that the author meant to say that the library is not designed to share the database: no concurrent access, or only access from a single process at a time.--Jwillem (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: http://cr.yp.to/cdb.html states "Packages that need to read cdb files should incorporate the necessary portions of the cdb library rather than relying on an external cdb library." DJB himself copies the CDB source into his other programs. What distro maintainers do is their business; the author's intentions are clear, and the article is correct as written. Delta407 (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not as shared library? 

message: Request for update to External Links to include
* mcdb  cdb fork supporting databases > 4 GB; thread-safe; bindings for Perl, Python, Lua, and Ruby
Relevance to Cdb_(software): mcdb is based on ideas in cdb, but mcdb was written to address various scaling limitations of cdb, notably 4 GB and thread-safety.  It should be noted that cdb was written for single CPU machines when hard drives were < 200 MB in size, not multi-core machines with 2+ TB disks, so the fact that cdb scales up to 4 GB is impressive.  However, today's data sets can be very large and fast data access in multi-core, threaded environments is in demand, hence the motivation behind mcdb. Gstrauss-wiki (talk) 10:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Request Edit