lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crossbuck

message: The contribution by 213.236.117.2 of a St. Andrew's Cross is welcome.  The next step is to get a pic of the real white on red thing.
Tabletop 11:17, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Andrew's Cross 

message: The crossbuck that say Railroad one way, and Crossing the other way...who developed that particular version? Kingturtle (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  who developed or conceptualized it? 

message: I'd like if a vertical variant of the Swedish crossbuck was added to the crossbuck gallery. G13178m (talk) 22:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add vertical variants of Sweden 

message: If the article is about the layout, it's almost fine. If it's about level crossings without barriers, a quite different one is missing for France: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panneau_de_signalisation_de_passage_%C3%A0_niveau_sans_barri%C3%A8re_en_France#/media/Fichier:France_road_sign_A8.svg, see https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panneau_de_signalisation_de_passage_%C3%A0_niveau_sans_barri%C3%A8re_en_France. 
However, G1 signs could be added to the page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panneau_de_signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_d%27un_passage_%C3%A0_niveau_en_France --OuiQui (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function or Layout? 

message: A section that explains how drivers have to behave when seeing this sign would be nice. Nakonana (talk) 20:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rules for crossing?
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-04-11/DVD releases

message: The right side of this page does not look good in my Firefox browser (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050317 Firefox/1.0.2).  Parts are invisible/unreadable/overlapping. Nroose 11:23, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, it looks OK to me in both IE and Netscape (haven't got a computer with firefox on handy at the moment), is your problem common to all Signpost pages or just this one? Worldtraveller 11:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Acts of Paul and Thecla

message: ??But this is an article about a text not a saint per se - and quite an important text.--Docg 21:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Someone keeps changing the references to Tryphaena to Antonia Tryphaena and hyperlinking. This factually incorrect. The story does not refer to Antonia Tryphaena but simply speaks of "Tryphaena". Whether the literary character in the story is intended by the author to be identified with the historical figure of Antonia Tryphaena is speculative (or POV), but in any case it remains a literary figure. If you can find the scholarship that deals with any historical information (and I can't lay hands on it) by all means record those views in the article.--Docg 13:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tryphaena 

message: The article seems a bit waffly, and low quality.  I'm going to chop unreferenced material and prune it a bit. Roger Pearse (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you'll also edit unreferenced material with corrected text, citing your sources.--Wetman 17:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waffly 

message: The line "Although probably consciously unhistorical, and certainly overstated, the tale reflects ascetic tendencies, and the experience of persecution in early Christianity," demonstrates a point of view and lacks sources to back it up. I propose it to be deleted. --68.32.17.238 (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issues 
Talk:Moirang

message: Hmmm. I added "cateegory: india" and it displayed a heap of unexpected stuff. Specifically, the "see main article about..." is nonsense cos there is no main article AFAIK. Is there a problem with the tag?
:you should have had square brackets [] instead of curly brackets {}. Gene Nygaard 14:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition 
Talk:Nuri al-Said

message: The article says there was a "perceived" threat from the Soviets.  Can this threat be verified?  Some people (mostly leftists) genuinely believe there was never any Soviet involvement that could be considered a threat to Western interests in the Middle East (or other locations, for that matter).  This is being rapidly disproven by the opening of Soviet archives, but they still have their fingers in their ears.  Anyway, just curious.--Daxtox 12:01, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and Britannica appears to own the copyright... --195.137.231.42 09:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The article refers to Nuri as-Said going to the UN to discuss Iraqi independance in 1932.  The United Nations was formed after World War Two; was the involved party instead the League of Nations?
:Yes, of course. I don't think I wrote that. Palmiro | Talk 16:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect UN Information 

message: "He was shot dead and buried that same day,..." 
According to a NY Times article on Nov 03/2006 (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/africa/03iht-web.1103chalabi.3388735.html?pagewanted=all), Nuri as-Said committed suicide at Chalabi's sister house. I understand that Ahmad Chalabi is not known as a reliable informant, but what is the true nature of Said's death then? Mirrordor 22:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of Nuri as-Said 

message: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/matpc.18175/
Oncenawhile (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo
Talk:Internet2

message: ADD TO THE HISTORY SECTION:
In 2010, Internet2 received a 62.5M American Recovery and Reinvestment ACT grant [reference https://www2.ntia.doc.gov/grantee/university-corporation-for-advanced-internet-development] that allowed Internet2 to put in place a long term IRU for fiber and upgrade the network with its own DWDM optical network system. Ciena later announced that this was the first 100G nationwide optical network. reference: https://www.ciena.com/insights/case-studies/Internet2-Building-Americas-First-National-100G-Network.html The upgrade to the new optical system was complete in December, 2012. Reference: https://www.internet2.edu/blogs/detail/4630 Rvietzke (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done NiciVampireHeart 11:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2019
Talk:System analysis

message: I don't think that MIMO should be redirected to this page. Maybe a link in MIMO, but not erasing that page directly. There could be MIMO information in the other page lost by moving. --Ncc1701zzz 12:55, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't received any comment in 24h, so I will change it, recovering the redirected page to this one and making a link in MIMO.--Ncc1701zzz 11:22, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Changed. If anybody thinks I'm wrong, please add a comment in the discussion, don't change it silently.--Ncc1701zzz 11:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: MIMO 

message: What is this article for?  It seems to just be a collection of loosely-connected thoughts, badly formatted, with no references.  For example, why does the article delve into a discussion (albeit brief) about LTI systems?  The general theme of the article appears to be software development procedures, but this sort of thing is already covered in Software_development_model and the like.  I would imagine that this article is verging on appropriate for deletion.  Oli Filth 19:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see now.  At some point in the recent past, someone added a load of irrelevant guff.  I've now brought the article back to something approaching a sensible state.  Oli Filth 19:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the purpose of this article? 

message: I would like to see a good list of system analysis tools and techniques. This would include: 
Flowchart,
Venn diagram,
Decision Table,
Decision Tree,
Decision Matrix,
Matrix – many kinds,
Cause, effect diagram,
Along with others I can’t think of. Where should this best appear? Should it be a section in this article or a separate list? What tools and techniques should be added? Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbeaumont (talk • contribs) 12:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of System Analysis Tools and techniques 

message: I feel that there really needs to be a rigorous formal mathematical definition of what a "system" is here. As far as I can tell, it seems to be sort of like an operator, but one that is perceived as running "in real time" along with its input. I hope someone who knows more than me can add a section formally defining what a system is. --1.122.182.53 (talk) 19:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematical rigor
Talk:Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology

message: RMIT University would read Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, this seems pleonastic. Not unlike if MIT was MIT University. Came across some difficulty moving the page, could somebody help?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikijokr (talk • contribs) 05:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is pleonastic. It is also their name, so please don't try to move it. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur with The Drover's Wife on this one.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the Page 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus, WP:TITLECON.  – robertsky (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: RMIT University →  – Use the official legal name per the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology 2010 (No. 3 of 2010) passed by the Parliament of Victoria. We also have WP:TITLECON policy. As a prior discussion said, we use Massachusetts Institute of Technology instead of "MIT" for the Wikipedia article title, even if the name "MIT" may be used often. This is also true for having California Institute of Technology instead of "Caltech" for article title. Cfls (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Higher education has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Australia has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 January 2024
Talk:Marie-Anne Gaboury

message: Did Isobel Gunn (as "John Fubbister") no go far enough west to be considered for the title of "first woman into the Canadian west"? http://www.hbc.com/hbcheritage/history/people/women/isobelgunn.asp  --  user:zanimum
:It's and interesting story, and presumably explains why at least one of account of Gaboury uses weasel terms like "first married woman". A couple of points. First, there were lots of women in the west, just none of European descent. But you knew that. Also as I point out, Gaboury settled there. Finally, she did travel further west, to modern Saskatchewan and Alberta, and this is the basis for her claim. There could possibly have been other European women in the red river area. Why not start an article? Fawcett5 14:16, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competing claim
Talk:Golden Rule (disambiguation)

message: Deleted link from "see also":
*Meta-Golden Rule
because it was dead. DewiMorgan 23:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: deleted

message: This should be converted to a "disambiguation" as wikipedia likes to call it.  --Budlight 04:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation

message: *The 2007 single What Goes Around... by American singer Justin Timberlake
</blockquote>
as I don't understand why it's relevant.
Thanks :), Drum guy (talk) 19:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:Discos Taxco

message: I'm not sure as to Wikipedia's standards on translation, but judging by the picture of the record label itself and Google, I have renamed this article from 'Taxco Records' to 'Discos Taxco', which is presumably Spanish for 'Taxco Records'. A search on Google for "Taxco Records" returns hundreds of Wikipedia mirrors but sod-all about the latera; a search for "Discos Taxco" returns only two links, and they are the same page, but they are the informative article which I have linked in the text; I have opted for quality over quantity. Taxco seems to be a place, as well, which confuses searches for Taxco Records without quotes.-Ashley Pomeroy 13:30, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bangor

message: I've completely reformatted this page, as it was very cluttered and didn't have much of a structure to it:
*The countries have been made into sections, and are now in alphabetical order.
*Where appropriate, each country has been split into two groups; firstly, for places called simply Bangor; and then, for other place-names (eg, Bangor Township).  The places are listed alphabetically within each group by the name of the state (etc).
*I've also renamed some of the links that don't yet exist.
Silverhelm 05:37, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the original Bangors in the British Isles should be listed first. Consensus? Andrew Oakley (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, Bangor in Northern Ireland should appear first  Ashiwashi (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformatting
Talk:Organum

message: The musical sample, "Resonemus hoc natali," is not drawn from the Magnus liber, but belongs to an earlier repertory associated with St. Martial de Limoges. We need to fix this. I believe the same CD has an organum duplum attr. to Leonin ("Propter veritatem") which would be perfectly appropriate. Epn10 (talk) 17:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Music sample

message: IMO, the definitions given, the supposed differences etc. given on melism.org. and org.purum are not yet clear enough. As for transcriptions entire: there is an ongoing project at L'Oiseau Lyre Monaco, otherwise no integral transcription exist. Waite focused on dupla by Leonin and did a partial transcription. I will take to my books and come back later on this. Martinuddin (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: content discussion: Melismatic organum, organum purum, Apel & Waite having transcribed 'entire' MLO

message: There's yet a third meaning of organum, see Organum Mathematicum at the Institute and Museum of the History of Science site.
I guess if we ever get an article on this, we'll also need to create an organum (disambiguation) page, but I don't think it's necessary when we only have two articles to list. Andrewa 14:26, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd meaning

message: I noticed an anon today (apparently from the UK) changed the pronunciation to put the stress on the second syllable.  I've never heard it this way:  always the stress is on the first.  Is this possibly a US English/British English difference?  Since "organum" isn't exactly an everyday word (except in fields like mine) it may not be something many people pay attention to.  I'm putting in that the word may be pronounced either way. Antandrus  (talk) 6 July 2005 20:36 (UTC)
Yes - it's a British Isles / European English pronunciation.
SleepyHead 18 April 2006 16:38 (GMT)
Is it? I don't think so. I've never heard it pronounced orGANum except by a American. All the Brits here in the UK that I know say ORganum. OldTownAdge (talk) 23:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation

message: is organum a style or a genre? Jackzhp 12:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  style vs. genre 

message: Would this be the equivalent of ison in Eastern Christian Chant?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.171.2 (talk) 22:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a question 

message: How was it possible to write an article about this subject without mentioning the term "drone"? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: drone (music) is already linked in the 2nd sentence: "a supporting bass line (or bourdon)".  A little better might be "a supporting bass line (or bourdon or drone". The target article though is pretty underdeveloped.  Sparafucil (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Drone]]
Talk:Kollam

message: Kollam City is 4 th largest City in Kerala. India cities are classified by population thats why in another page wiki updated correctly this . Here someone mistakenly or intentionally written Kollam as 5 th and now wiki supporting this , thats very bad . It questions integrity of Wikipedia.
Kollam is 4 th largest municipal Corporation in Kerala and second most density corporation in Kerala. Its in second position in per capita income as well .
Government websites
https://kollamcity.keralapolice.gov.in/kollam-city-police/history/kollam-city-police-history
https://lsgkerala.gov.in/lbinfo/#
https://www.kudumbashree.org/sub-district/8881002/20
https://www.republicworld.com/amp/lifestyle/travel/best-homestays-in-kollam-city-to-have-a-memorable-trip-to-kerala.html
https://dbpedia.org/page/Kollam_Municipal_Corporation
https://bigbangpokemon.com/animals/which-is-the-biggest-city-in-kerala.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kollam_Municipal_Corporation
http://cyberjournalist.org.in/towns.html
https://www.mapsofindia.com/kollam/
https://keralatourism.travel/destinations/kollam
https://travel2karnataka.com/kollam.htm
https://www.oyorooms.com/hotels-in-kollam/
http://www.muraharatravels.co.in/routes-directory/kollam-to-bangalore
https://traveltriangle.com/blog/things-to-do-in-kollam/ 117.230.29.119 (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please use the correct format for opening edit requests and refrain from repeatedly making the same request during a short timespan. Aaron Liu (talk) 07:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why wiki still not opening the page or Not updating correct data ? 

message: Palombe, an imaginary city from early modern European myth, redirects here, and it should not. This article claims without evidence that Palombe was identified with Kollam. Maybe it was, but if so, it was also identified with other places, including an island in the Bahamas. It is presumptuous to claim that Kollam is the only place on earth ever to be identified with Palombe. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 16:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kollam is a real city, not mythical Palombe
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 19

message: I think we should think seriously about splitting the "controversy" section into Terri Schiavo controversy as long as we maintain and preserve the key points of each subsection (Michael Schiavo, Bone scan, Schindler family, and 2003 petition).  See also Wikipedia:Article_size for some issues related to this task.  I think it's important to focus on Terri Schiavo, and if people want more information about these other issues, they should be able to find it easily. --Viriditas  | Talk 10:00, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am suspicious that after a weekend of editing adding material with a pro-Michael Schiavo POV and deleting material with a pro-Schindler POV, the concern is now on size.  Not certain but suspicious.  Was there an official wiki determination that the pro-Michael Schiavo POV is the neutral POV?  patsw 14:03, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What Proto said. The truth is never POV. If you dispute the truth, tough. An article on the Holocaust isn't going to be NPOV by including "pro-Holocaust" or holocaust-denier related material. If the truth tends to fall on Michael Schiavo's side, then that's just the way it is. Professor Ninja 15:22, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
I thought there was supposed to be no POV ... as far as I can tell the article is finally fairly neutral, unless stating empirical truth can be construed as being pro-Michael Schiavo. Proto 14:33, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting controversy section 

message: What are the neutral and objective guidelines that one can apply to understand what's relevant in the Terri Schiavo article and what's not?  I don't want to waste time or have anyone for that matter waste time researching and adding material only to have it deleted because it failed to pass another editor's relevance test.  In the general case, a wiki article doesn't have a finely calibrated test for relevance merely factual accuracy.  If the article has to be long because there are two or more sides to disputed claims, so be it.  A one-sided presentation doesn't serve the user community.  If this article is to have a netural POV, then its test for relevance ought to be neutrally stated rather that arbitrarily imposed ex post facto.  patsw 14:03, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance Test
Talk:Terri Schiavo case/Archive 20

message: I had put this bullet list in last night and it was removed. Why I don't know.
Symptoms of Bulemia and/or Anorexia
        * Eating uncontrollably (Bulemia only), purging, strict dieting, fasting, vigorous exercise
        * Vomiting or abusing laxatives or diuretics in an attempt to lose weight.
        * Vomiting blood
        * Using the bathroom frequently after meals.
        * Preoccupation with body weight
        * Depression or mood swings. Feeling out of control.
        * Swollen glands in neck and face
        * Heartburn, bloating, indigestion, constipation
        * Irregular periods
        * Dental problems, sore throat
        * Weakness, exhaustion bloodshot eyes
From the link http://www.mamashealth.com/bulimia.asp. Please note that dental problems (loss of calcium) could also explain the joint and leg problems. Wjbean 14:58, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unusually stiff neck

message: :Am I the only one who thinks the article is way too long? By just looking at how long it is, I feel scared by the thought of reading it. No offence against Terri and her family, but she was not that important. I mean, this must be the biggest article on Wikipedia. R.I.P. Terri.
:EliasAlucard|Talk 16:31, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
::No, you are 100% correct in regards to the article length, and we are in the process of splitting the article to bring it down to size. --Viriditas  | Talk 15:16, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: I believe the paraphrase of the discussion of the 1993 urinary tract infection to be POV and the remedy I propose is to insert the actual Wolfson report text from which the paraphrase is derived.  I am not inserting my own paraphrase but the text of the report -- how can that itself introduce POV?  Over and over again editors have substituted actual external text for user submitted text to remove POV.  What's different about this case? patsw 15:10, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, your "remedy" involved removing content from the report that you didn't like.  --Viriditas  | Talk 15:20, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphrase vs. primary source 

message: This link, http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html, provides a detailed breakdown of all legal actions regarding Terri and Michael Shaivo. It's long, but is worth the read. Wjbean 15:12, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal Grist for the mill