lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Haplogroup I (mtDNA)

message: Slovakia, Poland, and Hungary (among other nations or parts of nations) are in Central Europe. And so, with the ethnic group with the highest percentage of mtDNA Hg I
being the Lemkos in SE Poland, eastern Slovakia, extreme SW Ukraine, and NE Hungary... how can the author of this article (or the reference cited therein) state that
I is not found in Central European populations? 
During the Cold War, this part of Europe was often thought of as Eastern Europe. It made things easier. West vs. East. Us vs. them. 'Free' states and Soviet-controlled
states. However, geographically, Slovakia is in Central Europe. Kosice and Bratislava are closer to Paris than they are to Moscow. Eastern Europe is most of Russia,
eastern Ukraine, European nations in the Caucasus, Moldova, etc. Hungary and Slovakia and southern Poland are basically in the very heart of Europe, both based on
culture and latitude and longitude. Lemkos are Central Europeans.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.156.253 (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is off-topic here, Simply go to the wiki article.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:B035:3B87:7252:F895 (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  what constitutes central Europe? 

message: Given the geographical and chronological sequence, the sentence "Haplogroup I displays a strong connection with the Indo-European migrations;..." makes absolutely no sense. It is far before the IE migrations i Spain and Iran, but absent in the early steppe populations.HJHolm (talk) 15:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PIE connection??? 

message: "I3a has also been found in the Unetice Culture in Lubingine, Germany 2,200 B.C. to 1,800 B.C. courtesy article on Unetice Culture Wikipedia of 2 Skeletons that were DNA tested."
The location "Lubingine" does not exist in Brand 2013, nor in google maps, and the whole sentence is very much confused.HJHolm (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscitation
Talk:Annapolis Group

message: Please disambiguate Trinity College in both this main article and in the template box you have added on the article pages for member colleges.
Presumably you mean Trinity College (Connecticut)?
--Lang rabbie 22:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it's now disamb. - Classicfilms 23:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Charlwood Lawton

message: I arrived at this page via the "Random Article" link and, while i have heard of most of the political factions, events and people mentioned, I do not have a deep background in it all.  The article as it stands assumes you know of hand what, for example, a "whig", "jacobite", "nonjuror", etc. are.  Yes, I can click through, but a short phrase explicatory phrase of such things would make this article much more useful standalone. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 04:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context
Talk:Chester Moore Hall

message: There is a mistake in this entry. Chester Moor Hall died and is commemorated at Sutton in Essex not Sutton in Surrey. See here: http://www.rochforddistricthistory.org.uk/page_id__193.aspx?path=0p146p125p 
I have notified the Encyclopedia Britannica that they are wrong, but I am unable to edit the above text or the reference. Can someone who has permission do that please? Also, there is no 'e' on Moor. Thanks. (copied here by --ZimZalaBim talk 21:48, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment posted to main article
Talk:Haplogroup R0

message: Is no longer pre-HV, its R0 (splits into pre-HV1 & pre-HV2), the name change is already recognized by studies in 2007-2008 & FTDNA Cadenas2008 (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: pre-HV name change
Talk:Fukuda Chiyo-ni

message: Need to note the translator.--Yumegusa (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  morning glory haiku 

message: Hello, I wonder why English Wikipedia has her article under this name. (In Japan she is known as Kaga no Chiyo-jo (Lady Chiyo of Kaga). Her Japanese Wikipedia article reads
*She was a daughter of Fukumasu-ya
*She might marry with a man whose surname was Fukuoka 
but there is no mention of probability she is and was known as Fukuda someone. Can anyone cite a reference she is actually known united with this family name Fukuda? --Aphaia (talk) 09:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This NDL link mentions Fukuda and more generally refers to 千代尼句集 and 俳諧大辞典 for sourcing; apparently she married 福田弥八郎, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! I should have given a look to NDL first. ;) --Aphaia (talk) 13:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Fukuda?
Talk:Christian Cannabich

message: I started to rewrite this article beginning on January 24, 2010. Please late me state my reasons for doing so. The existing article had the following problems:
*There were no references or footnotes.
*The only source given was a very old article from the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911), thus only one terciary source was used.
*The lifetime of Cannabich’s father was incorrectly given as: 1700-1783 (and still is on the Italian and French pages). According to Randel, Don Michael, ed. The Harvard Biographical Dictionary of Music. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996, the lifetime was: 1690-1773
*The important relationship between Cannabich and Mozart was not treated at all. 
*No discography was given. 
*The important contribution of Cannabich to ballet music, the treatment of the clarinet, and of woodwinds in general, was not described.
*The article was partially translated from the German article; the translation was unidiomatic.
*The role of Cannabich as leader of the Mannheim orchestra was not described.Thomas W. Jefferson (talk) 18:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting of article on Christian Cannabich
Talk:Haplogroup V (mtDNA)

message: The statements: "...  more recent estimates of the date of V would place it in the Neolithic.[1] That makes an origin in the Near East more plausible..." are not supported by the reference given. The published article does not discuss this particular issue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.12.130.226 (talk) 14:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of V haplotype 

message: I would suggest that since Brian Sykes' clan names never caught on, Velda should probably be merged into this page. 50.37.124.19 (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Velda 

message: In which subclade does V-C72T fit? 62.48.155.6 (talk) 20:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  V-C72T
Talk:Christian Gottlieb Jöcher

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Expanded article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on works should be expanded
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
*Material from external link (in German) which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 10:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:English ship Triumph (1562)

message: Some references indicate that this Triumph was built in 1580. I found a more reliable reference saying she was built in 1562 (Historic Sail, Wheatly and Howarth, 2000) and have been advised of two other references using the 1962 date. This earlier date makes sense for several reasons. Her size and weight indicate she was built before the 'race-built' galleons were built under the guidance of John Hawkins starting in the 1570s.  Revenge was built keel-up as a 'race-built' in 1577, followed by Vanguard, Rainbow and Ark Royal. Triumph's dimentions with a burden of 1000 tons and a beam of 40 ft., do not match the 500 tons and 35-38 ft. beams of these 'race-builts'. I will welcome any comments here on this or other matters about Triumph.Tvbanfield 04:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to that, I have removed that comment from the page completely as it is unreferenced anyway. In the interests of... conservation? hmm... here it is in full: Triumph was alleged to have a twin which was built at the same time of her relaunch (in 1596). This unnamed ship was reputed to have been sunk before she was let out into the ocean for her first voyage. The mythology claimed that Triumph's twin was stolen by pirates and modified to serve as a pirate ship for the rest of her days. However, there is no factual basis for this story. If someone is able to produce a source that gives mention of this (seemingly unlikely!) then it could go back in, but otherwise it should stay out. Martocticvs (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

text: To Shem- just so you know I wasn't reverting you just for the sake of it there! The Triumph is now a fully-fledged disambig page, and whilst it did include this ship as a possible destination, I changed it to link to the  index page, as there's no obvious reason (to me anyway) why 'The Triumph' would primarily be referring to this incarnation of the name... so that I think makes mentioning 'The Triumph' or the film on this page pointless, as no one is going to be arriving at this page if they're after the film ;) I think that logic works, anyway...! Martocticvs (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me too. This article as written was originally titled 'The Triumph', and it made sense to the creator to link to the alternative title of the film, but since the article has been moved I don't think this is an issue any more. The article as written also seems mildly confused about the importance of the English Restoration to the HMS prefix. Since the prefix doesn't come in until the late eighteenth century, it's true to say that Triumph would not have been referred to as 'HMS Triumph', but this has nothing to do with the English Commonwealth/Restoration, which happened many years after this Triumph ceased to exist. Benea (talk) 20:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building date
Talk:Christian Mayer (astronomer)

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Portrait should be added from a source with a free license, if available
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded and references required
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
*External links present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 15:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:ITHINK Financial Amphitheatre

message: I work for Live Nation and I am attempting to create wiki pages for all of outdoor venues (amphitheatres).  I have permission to use appropriate text and logos.  I update the site, livenation.com, where I am copying some of this info for the time being.  I plan on expanding these pages - for use by patrons who frequent our buildings and our concerts.
Parrotusc 22:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: COI declaration

message: Please note there is a more complete page under the misspelled heading Sound Advice Amphitheater.  This page should be deleted and replaced with that one, and a redirect page created for the misspelled heading since several pages link to it.  I did not want to delete your work on this page. JimmB 15:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now a redirect to the new "Cruzan Amphitheatre" page so I am removing the link above to prevent the double redirect. --Mtjaws (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sound Advice Amphitheater

message: The article says the venue was initally called the Coral Sky Amphitheatre and also that it was originally known as the Sony Blockbuster Coral Sky.  Did Sony or Blockbuster buy naming rights after the opening and cause a name change or was that the name at opening? Goldnpuppy (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion 

message: When did it first open??  Seems like a pretty basic piece of info that's missing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.249.47.179 (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date?
Template talk:Interrupted

message: This should be moved to "Girl:" space. Which would leave us with the delightful "Girl talk: Interrupted", just like in the playground when I was even younger. Splash - tk 22:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What? MilesAgain (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He's punning with Girl, Interrupted (his link for "Girl:" space) and Girl talk 69.49.44.11 (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pun 

message: Is it mandatory to WP:SUBST this template? If so: 1) why? 2) stating so explicitly, like on Template:Unsigned would be good. /skagedal... 10:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't see why it would be mandatory. As a matter of fact, we're trying to improve the text right now, and it wouldn't be so bad if that were reflected whereever this template has been used. — Sebastian 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substing 

message: I never liked the word "interrupted", it always seemed curt to me. So here's a proposal that came up at WP:RD/L: Reword the text to "-- OriginalPoster - (continues after intermediary text below)". I will do that soonish if there's no objection.  — Sebastian 21:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To me the only meaning of intermediary is an agent.  How about insertion? —Tamfang (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's better - I'll use that. — Sebastian 22:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved wording 

message: Is there a reason for the parentheses around the text “continues after insertion below,” after the non-parenthesized dash? They seem unnecessary to me. —Frungi (talk) 07:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve removed them. If anyone disagrees, please do discuss. —Frungi (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentheses
Talk:Cristina Roccati

message: This is the translation of a passage in http://scienzaa2voci.unibo.it/biografie/86-roccati-cristina.
It really solidifies her achievements if the quote can be verified:
* Gian Alberto Colombo, her professor of astronomy and mathematics at the University of Padua, compared her to Vittoria Colonna, Laura Bassi and Maria Gaetana Agnesi. (November 6, 1752.)
* [Correspondence Roccati-Colombo, published in G. Grotto, Lodi of Dr. Cristina Roccati, Venice, Fracasso, 1815; cit. in M.L. Soppelsa, E. Viani, 1999, pp. 218-19.]
AMM Pittsburgh (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: To be verified
Talk:Christoph Graupner

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is a weak B; it has gaps in its biography and musical appreciation.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 01:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Template talk:Importance-s

message: I am a confused that this template and its "See also" both refer to WP:N which states WP:N#Notability_guidelines_do_not_directly_limit_article-content. Isn't importance of sections an issue of original research, sources, and undue weight? --Ronz 22:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've learned that it's this way for historical reasons and that it needs updating to be in line with current policies and guidelines.  NOR, SOURCE, and WEIGHT seem to apply.  NOT as well.  Others? --Ronz 23:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: But isn't importance completely difference than WP:N?
Talk:Christopher Condent

message: A few sources would be nice... Most of this is a perfectly reasonable summary of what is to be found in Johnson/Defoe General History of Pirates but there are a few surprising additions. Where did you find the date of death (1770) ? Does anybody have any sources at all for Condent other than GHP ? Boulet rouge (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional sources

message: Christopher Condent and William Condon are the same person, as is evidenced by the following passage:
  Grollτech (talk) 14:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Grolltech, you should probably merge them. If there ever was any controversy, one would expect it to appear at some point during the last 13 months. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Christopher Gist

message: Not much in your historical writings mention his son Thomas Gist.   I am related through Thomas Gist's only known child Elizabeth Johnson Gist who married Andrew McCune (born in Ireland).  This family moved to the what is now the Louisville, Ky area, helping settle Kentucky and further on across the River to Indiana.   There are numerous law suits of record in PA and Kentucky relevant to the Property owned by Christopher Gist "The Explorer".  The Gist Plantation property is currently owned by Penn State University as a satellite campus.  Thomas Gist and his sister and Thomas's daughter lived in that property together.   Some of the references out there are letters from George Washington who would occasionally drop by for visits with the family when he was traveling through the area.   As I've said there are also numerous law suite between Elizabeth Johnson Gist McCune and her Uncle, the brother of Christopher Gist (the Explorer) that provide further documentation that might be interesting.   PS there is also a Document which is a Journal created by Thomas Gist (my 5th g grandfather) of a trip he made down the Mississippi River to New Orleans.   I was able to see the original Journal at Princeton University Library.  As I was thumbing through this ancient document written by my 5th g grandfather I turned a page and written at the top of a blank page was his little daughter's name and date of her birth (It is not found in in other document I've found)also he referred to three other children which were Cromwell Children (they were related), he gave those children's names and dates of birth also.  This document is not allowed to be shared with anyone without the express permission of the Family who donated them.   To be quite honest that document should have come through my end of the family but when Thomas Gist died, his Sister took that document and other with her to her Brother's house in Kentucky.  information provided by Susan Mulledy DeFrank 47.149.130.65 (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More factual information on "Christopher Gist, the Explorer",
Talk:Alain Etchegoyen

message: Here's the first sentence in this article:
: Alain Etchegoyen (born 1951, Lille – d. April 9 2007), was a philosopher and the last Plan Commissionner before this Commission was abrogated.
What does that mean?  What is a "Plan Commisioner"??  "The Commission" refers specifically to WHAT Comission?  I'd expect at the very least a link to whatever "Commission" it is.  As it is the first sentence is completely cryptic. Michael Hardy 22:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: .
Talk:Christopher Slaughterford

message: This article is a stub of legal rather than paranormal interest.  Suggest substitute them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.96.86.28 (talk) 14:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Small telescope

message: The use of the term small telescope is also based on a telescope with an aperture of 4 inches or less.--Anderson   I'm Willing To Help 08:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Using the Sky & Telescope article "Three Great, Small Reflectors" we could say any telescope less than 5" is small. But in practice I would say anything smaller than 6" is small. More experienced observers even consider a 10" scope smallish. -- Kheider (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aperture
Talk:List of Suzuka chapters

message: Chapter headings from the Suzuka manga series.  Covers Volumes 1 through 18, including info for the 2 official fan books editions and the light novel.  Current as of October 2007. 
All chapter headings have been taken directly from the original JAPANESE version of the series.  All translations are mine, and will, no doubt, be different from the official wording from Del Rey Manga (USA publisher). --fizzman 22:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept 

message: OK, I'm done with the volume descriptions.  I've, basically, taken the descriptions from the Kodansha's Weekly Shonen Magazine website.  I've had to massage the info somewhat to make it more understandable, but I've tried hard not to include more plot info than was already presented on their site.  Now, I'm thinking this is it: that is, I'm NOT planning on adding info for each chapter (that would be a lot of work!); but more importantly, that'd give away the story, and I'm really not comfortable with that.  So unless someone has an opinion, I'm thinking I'm done.  --fizzman 21:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okay, I'm done; Pending Reader Comments? 

message: Can anyone tell me what the following items from various VolumeExtras sections are (since none of the libraries around here seem to have the series)?
* Character Profiles (I'm assuming it's exactly what it sounds like, in which case they probably don't need to be individually listed)
* Suzukamon
* Extra Story Chapter (if this is what it sounds like, it needs to be listed with the rest of the chapters)
* Hashibamon
* Esper Miho
* Special Chapter (same as Extra Story Chapter?)
* Premiums
* Alternate story line
Also, does anyone feel up to cleaning up the Guide Books and Light Novel sections? They both ultimately need to be merged back to Suzuka, BTW. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 19:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are these?
Talk:Rick van den Hurk

message: Hello there,
Last night (Wednesday 11th April 2007) there was an item on the Dutch television about Rick van den Hurk (or, as I read here on the English Wikipedia; Rick Vanden Hurk). I felt really proud when I heard about a fellow Dutchman playing in the Major League. Now, I have several questions. First about his qualities as a baseball player: I understood he has a great potential, do you agree? I really hope he will make it in the MLB! Second question is about is name. As I noticed before, I have read here that you Americans write his name like Rick Vanden Hurk. Why is that? That's not common for a Dutch name, usually it's Rick van den Hurk. Besides, he was born like Henricus van den Hurk. Now my final question: which other Dutch players have played in the MLB? I believe Win Remmerswaal and Robert Eenhoorn are two of them. Am I correct?
That was it. I hope someone can answer these questions for me. Already thanks a lot!
Greets from  the Netherlands, Maarten Inc. 22:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rather go by what VandenHurk says his name is tha some newspaper in Eindhoven. Also, what do you know about his passport? --Rabbethan 21:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Just because he was born with that name doesn't mean that's his name, it means that he was born with it. He very well could have changed his name. --Rabbethan 23:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, in this country you can change your name for whatever reason. But moving on to the point. MLB actually DID make a mistake, making his name Rick Vanden Hurk. This misspelling apparently did bother Rick, and he filed all the paperwork and such to get it corrected to Rick VandenHurk. According to VandenHurk himself, this is the correct spelling of his name, not Henricus van den Hurk. If you can find any definitive proof otherwise, please come forward with it.--Rabbethan 22:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I've heard it for both. When he first came up they were using it for him, but then started calling his curveball "the Holland Hammer" a couple months in. --Rabbethan 22:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question from Holland

message: Hi, this person never changed its family name, the name should be Rick van den Hurk and not as given. Kind regards, MoiraMoira (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I verified this - I am from The Netherlands - and will change it and leave the name without the spaces alive as redirect MoiraMoira (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name