Talk:Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor

message: What were some of the bad things that Joseph did? Was he a better Enlightened Despot than the others? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.105.213.102 (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was planning on writing an article about his 1782 edict of tolerance concerning the Jews. anyone have any thoughts?--Alhutch 22:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, went ahead and wrote it. It's here if anyone wants to take a look and help expand it....not that anyone reads this talk page or anything :-) Alhutch 23:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad things

message: :Image:Josephamadeus11.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Josephamadeus11.jpg

message: This is an amazingly negative article and I believe that it deserves to be labeled as POV. For a comparison, see the Czech wikipedia text about this leader: 
He was one of the most popular - and arguably achieved - Bohemian kings ever, credited for religious tolerance, abolishing of serfdom, effective end of censorship, dramatic improvement of the rights of Jews and peasants, the creation of a working system of hospitals, functioning secret police, office hours for new government's offices, reforms of education, limitation of the Catholic Church's control over the society.
Joseph II is the main reason why the first name "Josef" became so popular in the Czech lands. I think that someone familiar with these matters should improve the article and remove the negative bias. It looks like it was written by a Catholic bigot who loves serfdom, absence of hospitals, and educated leaders who speak many languages (Joseph spoke Czech). Please fix it. --Lumidek (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazingly negative article 

message: Why is the House of Habsburg-Lorraine infobox opening in the middle othe article? It is disruptive to the article's flow of text.-- Jack1755 (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. No idea why it took so long.--KrossTransmit? 04:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: 1. The article stated that "Austria was friendly to Russia though trying to remove Romania from Russian influence." At that time, there wasn't a Romanian country. Transylvania and Bukovina were part of the Habsburg Empire, Bessarabia of the Russian one and Dobrudja of the Ottoman state. Wallachia and Moldavia were vassal states of the Ottomans. The Russians were trying to gather more influence in the former two, which were known then as the Danubian Principalities. I have changed it to reflect this.
2. Also, I have changed the "Emancipation of the Hungarian peasantry". It wasn't a Hungarian peasatry, since the Kingdom of Hungary (part of the Habsburg Empire) had territories inhabited, besides the Hungarians, by Romanians, Serbs, Croats, Saxons, etc. It would be more correct to say "Emancipation of the peasants from the Kingdom of Hungary"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavius T (talk • contribs) 01:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A few corrections

message: Hello,
"He is buried in tomb number 42 in the Imperial Crypt in Vienna. He asked that his epitaph read: "Here lies Joseph II, who failed in all he undertook."" - I can't find anywhere, how goes the epitaph in the original language? And what was the original language, german, latin, french? --VillemVillemVillem (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Epitaph

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720192636/http://www.tu-dresden.de/jfaufbau/studienjahr/SS%202004/4.%20Privatrecht_adam.pdf to http://www.tu-dresden.de/jfaufbau/studienjahr/SS%202004/4.%20Privatrecht_adam.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article notes that he was never crowned King of Hungary, but should it also be mentioned that many Hungarians do not consider him to be a legitimate king because he was not crowned?  Emperor001 (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Legitimate King of Hungary

message: There is an angry child guarding this article, reverting any attempts at improving it. Don't even try. It will just revert it back. You have been warned. Martin J. Němeček (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If your sources are failing verification, you have only your own editing to blame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.169.22.138 (talk) 07:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beware the angry child 

message: The page Count of Artois lists him as that 1780-90, but I see no mention on this page at all of that title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44b8:4146:600:2119:fb6f:9fe9:d2f0 (talk) 21:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Count of Artois