lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Srinagar

message: Change "Kashmiri Hindus constituted 21.9% of Srinagar's population in the 1891 census and 2.75% in the 2011 census" TO
" Kashmiri Hindus constituted 8.39% of Srinagar's population in the 1981 census and 2.75% in the 2011 census".
Rationale: In the context of the insurgency in the 80s, does not make much sense to bring in 1891 census. Bringing in the 1981 census numbers paints the grave yet accurate depiction of the decline in population of Kashmiri Hindus. URL for 1981 census - https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/31511/download/34692/29233_1981_POR.pdf. Rexkash (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Charliehdb (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Charliehdb You may be mistaken. Page requires autoconfirmed access, which the requesting editor doesn't have. — kashmīrī TALK 12:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Charliehdb (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  The 8.39% figure is for the Srinagar district not the city. page number 58 - excerpt - "". I believe it should be reverted or edited accordingly. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2024
Talk:Aurangabad

message: change Aurangabad to Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar
Every government organization and webpage has named the district as Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar then why Wikipedia has still kept this old and redundant name?
Change the name everywhere on the Wikipedia page.
Also on any related pages. 111.125.231.89 (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion above regarding Bombay High Court hearing on the name change, and another source . Secondly, the name change discussion wasn't in favour in the last discussion a few months back. So no. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2024 

message: The local governing body i.e., City Corporation passed a resolution on name change in 1995. On 29 June 2022, the Shiv Sena-led Maharashtra cabinet approved the renaming of Aurangabad to Sambhaji Nagar, after Sambhaji Bhosale, the second Chhatrapati of the Maratha Empire.  which was approved by the government on 16 Sept 2023 103.79.252.185 (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please see the 6 similar requests above. This was discussed recently and the consensus was to keep the current name. Jamedeus (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2024 

message: In mid 90's Aurangabad was one of the fastest growing city in Asia. 
Can you please add this line? Meprasad4u (talk) 04:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 05:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 April 2024
Talk:Maurice Utrillo

message: I have a painting entitled Montmarte by Maurice Utrillo....how can I verify authenticity?
I have a Maurice Utrillo painting and on the back it says, "vp734.utrillo: faubourg parisien". How would I be able to verify authenticity? FrancesL1967 (talk) 17:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since his paintings displayed a lack of refined ability, they could be easily imitated. Assume that your paintings are not authentic.173.72.63.150 (talk) 23:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Conception dates seem to add up to the approximate time Renoir worked on Dance at Bougival with Valadon.  I think I read elsewhere that Renoir was intimate with most of his models. Viriditas (talk) 20:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: While Renoir may not have been the father, the men she had affairs with were often twice her age (except for Lautrec, who was only one year older than her).  Although we don't know who Utrillo's biological father is, it is interesting to note that he was diagnosed with schizophrenia given the hypothesis that schizophrenia may be associated with advanced paternal age. Viriditas (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Paternity
Talk:Nagpur

message: The article shows:
  Population (2011)[9]
 • Nagpur Metro  2,405,665
 • Estimate (2021)[10]  3,127,000
  ...
 • Metro  2,497,870 .
How can the difference between the two "Metro" numbers be explained?
Peter Jones
124.171.135.82 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 05:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing population numbers.
Talk:Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion, with a decision to keep and cleanup. It has correspondingly been sent to cleanup. The VfD discussion may be found here. -Splash 01:02, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, six or eight years later and I performed the necessary cleanup of unsourced and/or promotional material. I'll check back to see if it reappears. CorporateM (Talk) 03:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: Paul, Weiss has 8 offices, all of which are listed in the article (New York, Washington, D.C., Wilmington, Toronto, London, Tokyo, Beijing and Hong Kong), but the number that appears in the sidebar is 7. Can 7 be changed to 8?
NOTE: To be fully transparent, I am an employee of Paul, Weiss and am hoping to update some of the information in this article. I will not directly edit the page and am looking forward to working with editors on proposed changes.Meggebrecht (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Offices

message: The number of attorneys at Paul, Weiss is currently "more than 850" as can be found here: http://www.americanlawyer.com/law-firm-profiles-result?firmname=Paul+Weiss+Rifkind+Wharton+%26+Garrison
And more up-to-date revenue numbers are available here: http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202644041323/The-Am-Law-100-the-Early-Numbers-At-Paul-Weiss-Making-Headlines-And-Profits. The 2013 figure was $934.5 million.
NOTE: I am an employee of Paul, Weiss and am hoping to update some of the information in this article. I will not directly edit the page and am looking forward to working with editors on proposed changes.Meggebrecht (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Attorneys and 2013 Revenue

message: I've noticed the page has been changed immensely since the installation of these flags. After removing them and then having them placed back on the page, I've removed more content from the page that I found to meet WP:PROMO. I am now posting here to incite any discussion on the matter as I believe the conditions have been met in order to remove the flags now. Rizalnona (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This account was banned for WP:SPA so we need to take this with a grain of salt, but it looks to me like this editor removed a lot of the promotional fluff that the warning template is referencing. I don't think it needs to be here anymore. 107.129.140.66 (talk) 13:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing the Removal of the Flags on the Page 

message: This article has been extensively edited by the Yoodaba UPE sockfarm (, , and a whole lot of IP socks on residential proxies); the article will need a thorough review to ensure that the content added by these users is due and verifiable before the tag is removed. Best, Blablubbs|talk 12:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPE
Talk:Port Blair

message: Note:  Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition 

message: Have removed the below section as is a possible copyvio of www.ashextourism.com/Andaman&Nicobar/andaman_homepage.htm (the formatting indicates that text was not copied from wikipedia, but the other way around).  Besides, it is totally uncited.  Contains interesting info that, with decent citations, should go back into the article, so am pasting here to assist that. sassf (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Poss copyvio

message: The main island, on which PB is located, is emblazoned with Smith Island on Google Earth. No mention of this name here. Tony (talk)  13:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smith Island 
Talk:Kavaratti

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Lakshadweep or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Lakshadweep Addition 
Talk:Prigg v. Pennsylvania

message: The court in this decision refused to even consider the problem of the kidnapping of free blacks into slavery (see Twelve Years a Slave etc.), setting a precedent for later decisions and laws which also did nothing to solve this problem. See Slavery Law and Politics: The Dred Scott Case in Historical Perspective by Don E. Fehrenbacher. p. 23. AnonMoos (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Liberty Party platform of 1843 (adopted in advance of the 1844 presidential election) contains several negative references to Prigg v. Pennsylvania... AnonMoos (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Kidnapping of free blacks

message: The statement of the holding and the discussion omits one of the most important issues in the case, whether Congress had power to enact the Fugitive Slave Act.  I would propose to edit to the holding statement and then add discussion.  Lawrence Solum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.0.79 (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with Statement of the Holding

message: This is not an adequate summary of the main effect of the decision.  It weakened the particular enforcement mechanisms of the 1793 law, but pointed the way to much more stringent laws which could be passed in future (as happened in 1850).  Furthermore, by refusing to take any judicial notice of the problem of kidnapping of free blacks, it prepared the way for much nefarious skullduggery with its implicit message that blacks were entitled to fewer safeguards than whites. I really don't see how it could reasonably be considered any advance in the "history of American civil rights"... AnonMoos (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "further weakened the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793"

message: Someone added the date "1970", but that's the date of the reprint which I gave the ISBN for.  The book was originally publisheed in the early 20th century... AnonMoos (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Hudson McKee book date
Talk:Kochi

message: 1. can someone pls shorten the third paragraph of the lead section? There are too many company names. 
2. Kochi is a city with amazing history and culture, none of which are mentioned anywhere in the opening section. add something related to it in the first/2nd paragraph Nerdypanda4125 (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section is a mess 

message: I would like to add content to the Kochi page, the amenities, and the various places available that can be listed in your Kochi Wikipedia page Nikoinn (talk) 12:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself.  melecie  t - 12:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2021 

message: Why perumbavoor? Its aslo a part of kochi UA. And GCDA municipality. Southern suburb of kochi 117.217.206.113 (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Irltoad (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2024
Talk:Visakhapatnam

message: 1.It is 9th largest economy city in india with 43$ billion dollars according to 2018 reports.
2.It is 4 largest city in South india, after Chennai, Banglore,Hyderabad.
3.It is headquarters of Eastern Naval Command (ENC) for Indian Navy.
4.The only city in india which have two sea ports @visakaphatamporttrust(VPA), @gangavaram port.VPA is run by under government of India.@gangavaram port is handled by Adani ports and shipping.
4.Ganagavaram port is deepest port in india. Cillian cole (talk) 06:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FACTS ABOUT VISAKHAPATNAM
Talk:Silvassa

message: Hi, I think the article might violate NPOV with its current statements so I'm changing a few. Also, I think the photograph of the signboard with part of a rear view mirror showing is nice, but really unnecessary - it should be deleted. Will wait for a comment/reply on this till next week - in case there's no reply, will go ahead and delete the photo from here. wildT 17:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Dadra and Nagar Haveli workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Dadra and Nagar Haveli or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 09:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Dadra and Nagar Haveli Addition 
Talk:Rajkot

message: Rajkot has been selected as one of the Smart Cities under Smart City Mission of Ministry of Urban Development and has formed SPV in the name of Rajkot Smart City Development Ltd. Rajkotianrocks (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide independent reliable 3rd-party sources that cover this initiative for Rajkot (for example reputed newspapers or journals). Generally, information about such new developments should not be based on involved websites that primarily serve to promote their own causes. GermanJoe (talk) 19:07, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Information Need to be added  

message: The montage isn't very good, it should use the image of the aerial view of the city in it and have a mix of natural and buildings in it. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montage
Talk:Bartley Crum

message: Question regarding Bartley Crum: everywhere I read Crum was "labeled a subversive"; can this be further qualified as to who labeled Crum a subversive?  Was it (a) HUAC; (b) the FBI; or (c) media outlets influencing popular percpetions.  Thank you very much. Nobs01 3 July 2005 18:29 (UTC)
I personally knew the son and heard of his awful method of suicide (in front of his parents) but I do not have a citation on the method. Sorry for awful news, but may as well be complete. Carrionluggage 05:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Which president liked Crum's book?  What was the controversy between Crum's daughter and Trumbo's son?  It's not clear from the paragraph.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:B030:F407:E813:C6AB:879E:58F5 (talk) 12:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation referred to Truman, so added detail Aboudaqn (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear - Cleared
Template talk:Mergedisputed

message: I've given the issue a great deal of thought, and have arrived at the conclusion that this is the correct course of action.  My reasons are as follows:
*1. When this template was created, it served a valid purpose.  At the time, the primary  tags indicated that the articles "should be merged," without allowing for the possibility that this sentiment was less than unanimous.  Subsequently, a clear consensus emerged for the current wording, which merely states that the merger "has been suggested."  It can be assumed that a great many of these suggestions are disputed by one or more people; thus, this template has been rendered redundant.
*2. Because of the above, relatively few users switch to this template when disputing a merger proposal.  This creates the false impression that the articles containing the  tag are the only ones for which a merger has been disputed.
*3. A recent addition to this template was the separate categorization of disputed merger proposals (a goal with which the above issue interferes).  There's no practical reason for this, as relatively few people will bother to check such a category.  (Meanwhile, articles are removed from the category that many people do check.)
If anyone disagrees with my decision, feel free to revert my edit (but please give the above points due consideration).  —David Levy 19:54, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the change. If you feel strongly that a merge is objectionable, then this should be the correct template. 132.205.45.110 22:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you care you address my specific points?  —David Levy 03:07, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I've re-done the redirect.  The appropiate place to work out am erge is on the article talk page, and the normal merge tag is not "undistputed merge" after all. - brenneman {L}  01:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection to [[Template:Merge]]
Talk:Matheran

message: For the amazing editors here, this is just a reminder to not convert the Matheran Wikipedia Page into a travel guide. Wiki articles are supposed to be compilation of facts presented in a neutral tone. 
Wiki has a seperate website for travel guides, called "wikitravel.org". If you have information that would make travel to Matheran a lot better, please add it here.  Le Priyavrat (talk) 09:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a reminder to not make this a travel guide
Talk:ReBirth RB-338

message: I think this statement is irrelevant since the Rebirth does not contain any 64-bit code. It's correct that 32-bit applications can be run on 64-bit versions of Windows, but that goes for all 32-bit Windows software, not only Rebirth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.95.8.243 (talk) 19:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "64-bit versions of Microsoft Windows" 

message: This may have been among the first mass-marketed commercial soft-synths ever, but software synthesis goes back to Max Mathews in the 1950s. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.3.12.229 (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "among the first software synthesizers ever." ? 

message: A user on the Rebirth forums (RichB93) has made an unofficial patch to run Re-Birth on 64-bit versions of Windows. Link  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.87.56 (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "64-bit support" 

message: Since there are official Propellerhead Software "portable app" versions now, complete with support, I am updating the "Support was officially discontinued in September 2005..." sentence, as well as the final part of the lede paragraph, since Propellerhead is also concentrating on these new versions. 
 
I've also added some needed cites, in other sections. — DennisDallas (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propellerhead support (in lede) 

message: Are lings to pages like Thumbs Up or Seal of Approval really needed? 89.68.105.5 (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @89.68.105.5 https://beelink.pro/36038/ReBirth-RB-338-v.2.0-WiN-x64-MAC- 3MRB1 (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links
Talk:Heuriger

message: Some clarification may be useful concerning the various forms of the word Heuriger:
*Heuriger is the nominative case when the word is used without an article (as for example in a dictionary entry) or with an indefinite article. Thus, ein Heuriger is "a Heuriger".
*Used with a definite article or a demonstrative pronoun, the word becomes der Heurige ("the Heuriger") or dieser Heurige ("this Heuriger").
*According to the rules of declension, most other singular and plural forms of Heuriger read Heurigen, for example bei einem anderen Heurigen "at a different Heuriger".
*Like with words from other languages (cf. Latin medium versus plural media), I suggest in an English language context we only use two forms: Heuriger (singular) and Heurigen (plural).
I have adapted the spelling in the article accordingly. Any comments? <KF> 01:46, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
::As there is not "all-too-much" traffic on this talk page, I'd like to mention, as a first note: Even the deWP article :de:Heuriger was, up to now, "poor" (see its talk page on this, in case you read German).
::Therefore, the enWP article ist "almost adequate" to acceptable WP-standards. 
::Having done some editing on Anton Karas, recently, and therefore having come "here" as well as I came to the corresponding deWP article, I promise that I'll try to improve on thisone ASAP. WeHaWoe (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:The Green Eye of the Yellow God

message: Perhaps the god is still one-eyed when the jewel is returned because it only ever had one eye, like a Cyclops.188.29.33.74 (talk) 15:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Still one- eyed" 

message: I have moved the article back to its original place because the correct title of the work is The Green Eye of the Yellow God, not   The Green Eye of the Little Yellow God.  It 's true that over time the piece has come to be widely referred to under the latter erroneous title.  However, the correct title, The Green Eye of the Yellow God, is the one under which the piece was originally published, under which Bransby Williams performed it, and under which it was published in Michael R. Turner's anthology, Victorian Parlour Poetry.
David Wilson (talk · cont) 15:58, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Curt Bisquera

message: Pure and simple, just an awesome drummer. He always looks like he's having a blast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.56.164 (talk) 20:10, 3 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In promotion of the album She's The One, back in 1996 Tom Petty had an interview with Redbeard on The Album Network. I remember him saying that for the percussion on the song Angel Dream No 4, Curt was recorded playing his own stomache (!) and I seem to recall Petty reproducing it during the interview with Redbeard. I had this whole interview on cassette back in the 90s but I have since lost it. Can anyone confirm this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.139.32.40 (talk) 14:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  recorded playing his stomache?
Talk:Peacotum

message: Whoever made this page is the coolest!!1
Did you ever hear it said, self praise is no praise--File Éireann 3 July 2005 20:20 (UTC)
anyone have a picture of one?  I would post one, but I can't find a picture of one, and well I can't find any locally to purchase. Quazywabbit 01:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)