Talk:Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game

message: There is no Blue Dracolich.....
I think....
Can someone confirm that?
The Ronin 15:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: War of the Dragon Queen

message: I was considering making seperate articles for each expansion set in the DDM game and explaining some of the more famous or popular minis. If no one has any problems with this, shall I go ahead and do that? ShadowUltra 22:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection. The more info in Wikipedia the better, as long as it sticks to encyclopedic form. I would however say that fixing this article, adding info explaining gameplay etc is of a higher priority in the scheme of things - Waza 01:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate Articles?

message: This stub has mixed information about both D&D and Star Wars and the one line about each does not need a page for just them. shadzar|Talk|contribs 17:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the Star Wars information.  Unless someone wants to expand the article, I'd agree.  But there was talk of expanding them in the discussion above, though nothing seems to have come of it.  Is there a time limit on these things? --Suttkus 19:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't found any time limits on anything around Wikipedia. But being new myself and trying to help clean up some of the ecvess D&D stubs I placed the merge notices for people that created the page to discuss if they (the articles) really need their own page. shadzar|Talk|contribs 03:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than creating stubs for every set, if someone is keen to have all these articles it would be best to do one correctly and fully written to set an example for how the others can be layed out. - Waza 00:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge [[Harbinger (D&D)]] 

message: First, from the beginning, DDM hada page for all the sets. 
Then I went ahead and changed that, adding a page for each set. 
Then Percy Snoodle changed it back. 
I've had a number of people agree with my changes, and a number of people who have not. With no offense to Percy Snoodle, I'd like to initiate a vote to see which is better. The Ronin 00:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think that there is much to say about the game. to give every set it's own page. what would be orther then a list of minis?Dm2ortiz 02:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

text: This argument has reached no consensus as of February 2006. The Ronin 22:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Individual or Joined?

message: *Well, I see it this way, multiple pages is a great idea in concept, but at the point the pages were removed, they didn't have remotely enough content to be worthy of existence.  What do you intend to put on the pages to make them valid encyclopedia entries?  Most of the conversation above consists of discussing this issue for as far back as July and, frankly, nobody has put anything useful on the individual set pages.  Convince me it's a good idea and I'll change my mind, but right now, there seems to be no point.  --Suttkus 18:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think that there is much to say about the game. to give every set it's own page. what would be orther then a list of minis?Dm2ortiz 02:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: One Page

message: *The Ronin 00:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This argument has reached no consensus as of February 2006. The Ronin 22:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Pages

message: (Need to figure out where to work this in to the article)
There were an older line of miniatures produced by either TSR or WOTC that predate the Harbringer set - while they predated the current game, many of the miniatures are legal in tournament play with updated rules.  - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 02:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest adding it in a sections on rules/tournaments --Cunnington A (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  In fact there isn't anything about tournaments, store packs, promo figures , repainting, and more. --Cunnington A (talk) 19:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chainmail miniatures (todo) 

message: New information about this change has been added and a reference link. Someone may want to include more that works on this article to clarify any confusions the newest information may cause in the article. shadzar-talk 05:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  D&D Miniatures Changes Announcement 

message: Latest news has the skirmish game as canceled and I have started to include details, which means the article may need substantial rewrites in order to bring it into the proper tense. shadzar-talk 00:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Canceled

message: Wikipedia:Notability (toys and games)
A toy or game is generally notable if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of the following criteria:
2 The toy or game has won a notable award or a commendation from a recognized national or international educators, parents, medical, or consumers group or some other similar body.
2006 Origins Award winners
shadzar-talk 13:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: I've been involved in the D&D miniatures community since 2006, and I've nearly completed a total rewrite of this page, updated with current information, following wiki guidelines, and with additional references. I will be updating it later this week once I finish it. Deutscheben (talk) 01:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it, dude. If there's anything in this page that still works, then keep it, but otherwise, feel free to start over. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 02:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete Rewrite