Talk:Digimon/Archive 1

message: Inserted basic information on the new manga - main character's name and the fact he uses the Digimon Mini and makes contact with the digital world through it. 22:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digimon Next 

message: While I admire and applaud the breadth of information that is posted about various digimon, I feel that it would be far more beneficial if the individual stubs were combined. That is to say, for example, WarGreymon, MetalGreymon, Greymon, Agumon, etc. should all be in one article. --mwazzap 02:41, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up/Merging of Digimon Stubs 

message: The article says that neither the digital pet nor the movie are well-known in the US. I don't know about the movie (I'm not a Digimon fan), but I take issue with the idea that the digital pet isn't. They're probably rare now, but when they first came out here they were fairly common -- they probably at least as popular as Tamagotchi, at least in my local area, and there were plenty of commercials on TV for it ("Prepare to Digimon!", they would exhort us). But I doubt we've forgotten the original Digimon; they just died out because virtual pets were a passing fad. But we remember 'em. --Furrykef 21:08, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pet not well-known? 

message: As far as I know, in Japan the surname is written first:
i.e "Yagami Taichi" instead of "Taichi Yagami", as is written in the article.
I'll leave it up to you..I may be wrong.
-
In English, the naming order is switched around to GN, FN in many publications. WhisperToMe 04:35, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The majority of the articles use 'Tai', 'Matt' etc, instead of the full names.  Where they have been mentioned, it's 'Taichi Yagami' and similar.  I would rather leave them as they are, since they occur so many times.  You may want to see DigiDestined for an idea on how they are done.  -x42bn6 Talk 11:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Yes, but this is the English Wikipedia, and we are supposed to make it more suitable for English audiences.  x42bn6 Talk 16:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Names 

message: Umn.....Ew? Do we really need that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.19.144 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 25 June 2005
:Agreed, it needs to follow the guidelines of Wikipedia:External links.
:#In general, any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes an example of brilliant prose.
::This breaks the rule - Digimon hentai is not what this article is about.
:In addition, even though Wikipedia is not meant for the protection of minors, it still doesn't mean that we add links to hentai (especially one that doesn't say "Explicit content", but simply "Fanart").  It does not add any encyclopedic information to this article.  x42bn6 Talk 06:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hentai 

message: Is there a Wikiproject for Digimon?  x42bn6 Talk 07:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it - Wikipedia:WikiProject Digimon Systems Update.  x42bn6 Talk 06:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject 

message: I have commented out this from ==Fan influence==:
:Customs included starting new stories, drawing pictures for fellow FDDs, and making websites about their characters.
What does "Customs" refer to?  x42bn6 Talk 09:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customs? 

message: There is a wiki page about Digimon
http://wiki.digivice.net/index.php?title=Main_Page
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.141.155 (talk • contribs) 
:It's in the external links already. Circeus 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very own Wiki Page 

message: I reinstated part of this section with a different header, the original was definitely inappropriate.
While the existence of FDD is easily verifiable, whether it is notable is another question entirely, and I think it is just a more systematized form of genfic, so I'm leaving it out. Circeus 17:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "fan influence" 

message: "Digimon first appeared in game form on January 28, 1999 with the release of the popular Digimon World game for PlayStation."
Apparently not the first.
You'll have to go to Gamefaqs and type "Digital Monster: Version S" into the search box because they don't allow linking directly to specific pages.
Released January 1997.  It must exist, because someone made an FAQ on it... 86.128.124.11 16:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to gamefaqs they're two games, Digital Monster Version S and Digital Monster Version S Digimon Tamers, released in 1997 and 1998 respectively. But since I can't find anything on Digital Monster Version S I'm going to change it to Digital Monster Version S Digimon Tamers. Nightmare SE 10:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

text: btw, here's a screenshot of the game's title screen: . Someone speaking japanese could come along and tell us what the katakana on the bottom says. I highly suspect it's "Digimon Tamers", which would mean "Digimon Tamers" is a subtitle. --`/aksha 13:22, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Little-known game?

message: I'm tried of all this vandalism and mass wipes.  We newed to protect this page.  --Eldarone 01:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I only see two acts of vandalism today, and it's by the same user.  I have almost all of the digimon related articles (that I'm aware of) on my watch list, and vandalism recently doesn't seem any more significant than before (although there is more activity in general).  It's just something we have to deal with. -- Ned Scott 05:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Not yet, it's not critical or uncontrollable (yet).  x42bn6 Talk 06:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've requested the protection taken off, for now. Although I know it's hard to deal with anons, but we do get more useful ones than vandals. -- Ned Scott 06:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call to Temporary Block because of Vandalism 

message: I added a link several days ago but it was deleted cause it's not allowed but I was said I could readd it if I discuss it about it. I'm sorry I added it but I didn't know it was allowed...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glendi (talk • contribs) 
:What is the link?  Wikipedia does not allow sites that are non-notable or will make the Wikipedia look unencyclopedic.  Please sign comments on talk pages with ~~~~ - it helps us keep track of who said what.  x42bn6 Talk 01:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only link that was removed recently was by me, because that same anon did these 3 edits (shown as one). So.. yeah... no. -- Ned Scott 05:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: Glendi 13:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No I'm no that one  

message: There has been an awful lot of vandalism lately - semi-protection, anyone?  x42bn6 Talk 20:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, why not. I don't like semi-protection, but reverting the vandalism is a waste of everyone's time.  --`/aksha 01:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Semi-protection application failed.  Oh well...  No big deal.  x42bn6 Talk 21:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection, take 2 (?)