Talk:Autopen

message: : To James, cheers, John Travolta
Can a signature machine be programmed to create personized signatures? I mean John Travolta can write lots of common names and store the writings in a computer. He can then hire one assistant to read and reply the fan letters each with a personalized signature.
Maybe Mr. Travolta can sign his name a dozen times and let the machine do all the variations. Maybe the machine can sign randomnized signatures (variations in pen direction, speed and force). -- Toytoy 09:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  To John, Tom, Jane, Dick, Tim, Mark, Ron, Mary, Sue, George ... 

message: I'm bothered by the word "forge" in this article.  With respect to signatures, generally it means commiting fraud or counterfeiting.  However, if it's being done with the consent—and perhaps under the supervision—of the signer, surely no such meaning is appropriate.  Or could forge be intended to mean to form or bring into being especially by an expenditure of effort?  In that case, perhaps another word should be substituted.  —EncMstr 03:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It seems like the person who originally wrote this article had been burnt buying an autograph as genuine and finding it had been autopenned. This sort of point of view has no place in wikipedia. I've done some more research into the topic and NPOV'ed the article some more. Theducks 22:59, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forge? 

message: This article is a good start, but needs much more information/explanation of how the device(s) work.  01:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it work? 

message: The current text of the article says that Thomas Jefferson used an early autopen extensively, beginning in 1804 (i.e. during his presidency), but then goes on to say that Truman was the the first US president to use an autopen routinely in correspondence.  These clearly cannot both be true.  72.156.8.56 (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The confusion seems to be in referring to the "polygraph" as an "autopen," rather than as a signature duplicating device which predates the Autopen.  I will attempt to re-word and make an explicit link to the Wikipedia article on Jefferson's polygraph machine. Miklasky (talk) 17:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jefferson or Truman? 

message: Do we know if Obama's use of an autopen for the patriot act extension is actually noteworthy? I know it's getting some media coverage, but I'm not clear on whether or not using it to sign something like this is unusual.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.223.0 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama and Autopen 

message: The Longpen appears to be an example of a Telautograph.  The function of the Autopen is to duplicate the same signature or writing repeatedly.  The function of the Longpen appears to be to transmit a person's handwriting (just like the historic Telautograph).  The distinction seems to in how the device is controlled (whether by machine or by a person).  Perhaps this article be organized slightly differently with a section on "related devices"? Miklasky (talk) 18:13, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Longpen really an Autopen? 

message: The caption on the photo appears to be correct: it is a check-signing machine.  This would appear to be much similar to a duplicating polygraph than an Autopen.  Is it possible to get a copyright-appropriate image of an actual Autopen? Miklasky (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's one from our "museum".  Hope it's helpful.  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Autopen_Model_50_from_the_International_Autopen_Company.jpg#file Bolding01 (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the photo be updated? 

message: I noticed looking in on the Autograph article that there is already a section on Autopenned autographs (and thus, famous users of Autopens).  Perhaps this article should focus just on the actual mechanisms of machines that replicate signatures with extensive links to related information that is already (better) documented on Wikipedia?  If no one else has suggestions, I may try to "be bold" in a week or so and assert a new structure after doing more research on Autopens. Miklasky (talk) 00:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall article structure 

message: The article currently states:
:Some say Harry Truman was the first United States President to use the Autopen as a way of responding to mail and signing checks.[13] Others credit Gerald Ford as the first President to openly acknowledge his use of the Autopen,[14] but Lyndon Johnson allowed photographs of his autopen to be taken while he was in office, and in 1968 the National Enquirer ran them along with the front page headline "The Robot That Sits In For The President." [15]
However, I have some sources state that Eisenhower was the first to admit having used an autopen, but prior to becoming president, and that the first known President was Kennedy. While it is sill true that Johnson seems to be the first to go public with images.
:"The first president to use an autopen (a machine that engages a matrix made from an original signature to sign multiple copies of letters and photographs) was Dwight D. Eisenhower while president of New York’s Columbia University from 1949-1951. The first sitting president to use an autopen was President Kennedy, who already as Senator had installed a machine in his office in 1958." - See more at: http://www.lionheartautographs.com/24/#sthash.hCrTqYaz.dpuf
:"There’s an entire book dedicated to the auto pen. In 1965, Charles Hamilton published “The Robot That Helped to Make a President,” about how President John F. Kennedy used the machine."
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/autopen-barack-obama-10-facts-85720.html
:Dwight Eisenhower was the first president to out himself as an autopen aficionado. Everyone knew Kennedy had one. LBJ made the cover of the National Enquirer in 1968 for his autopen. The headline called it, scandalously, “The Robot That Sits In for the President.”
http://www.northernvirginiamag.com/entertainment/entertainment-features/2013/07/29/sincerely-yours-this-machine-does-not-exist/
: It would almost certainly have been FDR. Some sort of automatic signature machine was used in combination with IBM/Commercial Controls Corporation Flex-O-Writers to send the White House condolence letters to families of US soldiers lost in combat during WW II. It should be easy enough to find and check a couple of these letters in some archive; I'm not positive they were typically signed by the president, but I believe they were.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.46.86 (talk) 06:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was first? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Autopen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005215904/http://www.realsig.com/autopen.htm to http://www.realsig.com/Autopen.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140423053734/http://signaturemachine.com/company/washingtonian.pdf to http://signaturemachine.com/company/washingtonian.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/when-a-robot-signs-a-bill-a-brief-history-of-the-autopen-20130103
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213230613/http://rockville.patch.com:80/articles/rockville-companys-signature-replications-have-homeland-security-calling to http://rockville.patch.com/articles/rockville-companys-signature-replications-have-homeland-security-calling
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I get it when authors are pissed, because they have to sign for hours until their arms fall off and the first thing some people do is selling the autograph on Ebay. On the other hand, it seems like pure fraud, when people have to fork over $600 for a book they assume was signed by an actual person. After all, the signing of a law is a bureaucratic act, whereas an autographed book is a kind of fetish. The magic does not come from a machine. That's like selling original splinters from the Holy Cross made in Hong Kong. -- 2003:E5:1700:F951:5C5E:7AC7:DCA0:29DE (talk) 09:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a question about this article? 331dot (talk) 09:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal or fraud?