Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Froth

message: User:Froth
      run at Fri Mar 9 16:54:50 2007 GMT
Category:	1
Help:	1
Image talk:	10
Image:	40
Mainspace	604
Portal:	15
Talk:	153
Template talk:	20
Template:	47
User talk:	382
User:	666
Wikipedia talk:	530
Wikipedia:	2463
avg edits per article	4.55
earliest	17:55, 11 July 2005
number of unique pages	1084
total	4932
2005/7 	55 	
2005/8 	0 	
2005/9 	0 	
2005/10 	0 	
2005/11 	0 	
2005/12 	0 	
2006/1 	8 	
2006/2 	5 	
2006/3 	6 	
2006/4 	77 	
2006/5 	33 	
2006/6 	111 	
2006/7 	31 	
2006/8 	101 	
2006/9 	340 	
2006/10 	395 	
2006/11 	221 	
2006/12 	734 	
2007/1 	1564 	
2007/2 	1158 	
2007/3 	93
Mainspace
57	Counter-Strike: Source
53	Nintendo NSider Forums
27	MapleStory
14	Half-Life 2 controversies and criticisms
11	Age of the Earth
8	Progress Quest
7	Counter-Strike culture
7	SteamID
6	Halo: Combat Evolved
6	List of Microsoft Windows components
6	Mickey Mouse
4	Source engine
4	Cedarville University
4	Sum 41
4	RateMyTeachers
Talk:
17	MapleStory
15	Age of the Earth
9	Nintendo NSider Forums
9	Nintendo NSider Forums/Archive 1
6	Absolute terror field
5	Counter-Strike: Source
5	Bullshido
3	Ken Blackwell
3	SkiFree
2	Wish-Bone salad dressing
2	Flaming (Internet)
2	Rejected
2	FlashGet
2	FLCLimax
2	Mew glitch
Image:
4	Counter Strike Source2.png
4	Egeskov Slot spejling FOCUS.png
4	Flcl-flclimax.png
3	ISS.jpg
2	US Penny 2.PNG
2	Aerospike Engine Focus 2.PNG
2	Torre Agbar - Barcelona, Spain - Jan 2007 (edit 1).jpg
2	Aerospike Engine Focus.PNG
2	Vista Disk Mgmt.png
2	Ajaxf.JPG
Image talk:
2	Zipper animated.gif
Portal:
6	Computer science/Did you know
3	Computer science/Selected article/archive/1
2	Computer science/Selected article/archive
2	Computer science/Selected article
Template:
6	Counter-Strike series
6	Half-Life topics
6	Valve Technology
4	Day of Defeat series
3	Team Fortress series
3	POTD caption/2007-01-20
2	FPCdel
Template talk:
9	Half-Life topics
3	RD header
2	Please leave this line alone
User:
115	Froth
100	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/header
86	AmiDaniel/VP/Approval
62	AmiDaniel/VP/L
45	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/leftside
36	Froth/monobook.js
24	Froth/notes
21	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/toc
17	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/nav
12	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/howtoask
11	Froth/notes/mockup
11	Froth/test1
7	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous
7	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/header/otherrd
6	Froth/notes/Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing
User talk:
35	Froth
29	Prodego
15	Freshgavin/Sandbox/Reference desk
11	Betacommand
11	AmiDaniel/VP/L
7	Schgooda
6	Friday
6	Hipocrite
5	Tellyaddict
5	MacGyverMagic
5	Fir0002
4	218.214.70.16
4	Freshgavin
4	Ardo191
4	Mapletip
Wikipedia:
742	Reference desk/Computing
696	Reference desk/Miscellaneous
63	Reference desk/Science
50	Reference desk/RD header
35	Reference desk/Mathematics
34	Help desk
33	Reference desk/How to ask and answer
33	Reference desk/header
28	Featured picture candidates/Bezier curves
23	Reference desk/header/nav
20	Reference desk/Entertainment
18	Featured picture candidates
16	Reference desk/header/leftside
15	Requests for comment/User names
14	Reference desk/header/otherrd
Wikipedia talk:
443	Reference desk
27	Requests for comment/StuRat 2
12	Reference desk/guideline
10	Reference desk/guidelines
10	Reference desk/style change
7	Reference desk/RD header
3	Reference desk/colors
2	Reference desk/RD header/Archive
2	Reference desk archive/Computing/Early
2	Reference desk/purpose
2	Requests for comment/StuRat
2	Reference desk/rules
Edit count from Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 16:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

message: ... to see how the crats determine consensus on this one. I personally find the oppose votes rather unimpressive. – riana_dzasta 01:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I, personally, agree that the "oppose per Q1" argument is weak. However, its not uncommon for opposes to be made on the basis of a "need for tools" or "poor answer to questions" argument. When such a significant proportion of the !voting community are in agreement, its hard to see how a 'crat could discount them. We'll see, however. Rockpocket 01:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too, but regardless of how many people have used it, there is a difference between an argument that isn't accepted by everyone and an argument that's just frivolous. And I don't think it's really frivolous, wrong or not. -Amarkov moo! 02:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the point is that adminship is a privilege and admins should be expected to earn that privilege by helping out with some of the dirty, tedious chores around here, not just using the tools for their own personal area of interest. It's perfectly fair for the community to ask at an RfA what do we get in return for giving this candidate the tools. We need more admins to clear backlogs etc. Ironically, it seems those RfA candidates who have actually got stuck into the dirty work are more likely to fail to be elected because they've made enemies dealing with borderline trolls and vandals. --Folantin 09:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It will be interesting...