lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:French frigate Artémise (1794)

message: Another ship of the same name was involved in the French Incident (Hawaii) in 1839. That article uses this picture, but one of the two must be wrong, if this ship was destroyed in 1798. W Nowicki (talk) 02:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Artémise involved in French Incident (Hawaii) was a 60-gun frigate built in 1829. She would have looked like Belle-Poule, sp quite different from the Artémise of 1794. Rama (talk) 12:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Please do upload it, it is always valuable to have these illustrations. I can comment it if you are interested. Cheers! Rama (talk) 08:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which one? 

message: This article does not cite any reliable source of information. Should be credited as least one reliable and searchable publication where the information, specially the dates, must be verifiable. --Bestiasonica (talk) 10:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Sources credited
Talk:Theatrical adaptation

message: No objections to copying it there, but this can be a complete survey article about the history of theatrical adaptation -- it just needs to be written.  Please do not delete it. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 19:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wictionary

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 15:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-01-20 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: "These decisions are always controversial and comparisons between the original and the adaptation are unavoidable." This is a strong conclusion and needs to be supported by text references. Thisisnotatest (talk) 03:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Always controversial/unavoidable
Talk:Mondaino

message: The first quotation of “castrum quod vocatur Mons Dainus” dates back to 1069, when the village was donated by Pietro di Bennone Pier Damiani from Rimini; Mondaino was therefore ruled by the abbot of the Monastery of S. Gregorio in Conca together with the bishop of Rimini until when it yielded to the Municipality of Rimini in 1233, when it became a Municipality, together with the other municipalities and castles of the Dioceses. Under the rule of Malatesta from the end of the thirteenth century, for more than a century Mondaino was involved in the wars waged by the members of this family, among its factions, against the Church and against the Montefeltro Family. After the Pontifical victory it passed from 1464 under the government of Fano; in the sixteenth century Fano and Mondaino were repeatedly sold and regained by the Apostolical Chamber and in the second half of that century there was a period of substantial unification with the Duchy of Urbino. In 1578 Mondaino went under the rule of Ravenna and then to Fano one; it returned back to the rule of Ravenna in 1590 and stayed in the Legation of Romagna for two subsequent centuries. At the end of the eighteenth century, with Napoleon’s occupation, it became part of the Department of Rubicone and of the Cisalpine Republic, then from 1816 it became part of the Province of Romagna of the Pontifical State, up to the constitution of the Kingdom of Italy in 1861.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cipslim (talk • contribs) 05:17, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Mondaino
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Angela from the Blue

message: User:Angel_from_the_Blue
    run at Fri Jan 18 19:15:08 2008 GMT
earliest
number of unique pages  0
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 19:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Angel from the Blue
Talk:Rimini

message: "800,000 years ago"??? That's a very long time ago as far as human populations go. In fact, Human ancestors hadn't even left Africa by then.  Citation absolutely needed for such a claim.(or deletion)  --Trefalcon (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  800,000 years ago 

message: According to the photograph, it was built in 21 BC, while actually it was 21 AD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.160.228 (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge 

message: It is said that Rimini had 1,470,000 rounds fired against it.  Surely its notable buildings and infrastructure must have suffered significant damage.  The article should provide some information about this.  71.6.87.50 (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damage during World War II 

message: 'It is one of the most famous seaside resorts in Europe, thanks to its 15 metres (49 feet) long sandy beach, ...'
Surely this is an error. Even a small beach is longer than this.
206.47.94.52 (talk) 22:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beaches?? 

message: The article cites that Rimini has more than one thousand hotels, information that was added in December 2010 by an editor with little participation, and with no sources. That number of hotels was then later repeated in the body and a source was added by a 95% WP:SPA, who, with one exception, has been absent for over a year. Would anyone be able to consult the source and verify? Thanks. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 07:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than 1,000 hotels 

message: Quotation: "The area was inhabited by Etruscans until the arrival of the Celts, who held it from the 6th century BC until their defeat by the Umbri in 283 BC."
That's not true at all. The Celts, the Senones more precisely, arrived around 390 BC. And they were defeated in the battle of Sentinum in 296 BC. Not by the Umbri, these were in fact among their allies. But by the Romans and their allies the Picentes. For reference check the Italian version of the article and the Italian  article on the battle of Sentinum. 31.24.11.129 (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient history
Talk:Tornidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 17:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Omalogyridae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Rock Racing

message: The start of the article is way too partial. We can't say that the team's markting plan is to hire dopers...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.42.98 (talk) 00:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: if the coverage in the cycling press is "this team courts publicity by hiring dopers," then we can say "the coverage in the cycling press is that this team courts publicity by hiring dopers." Uucp (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

message: He's not on the team anymore. I don't see why he should be kept in that section. Don't fall asleep zzzzzz 20:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's pretty standard WP  for teams... one shows the current roster and, depending on the sport, losses to retirement, trades, free agency, injury, or even death. Rock Racing 08-09 --- the Hamilton story is one of its biggest events.  Cheers , --Smilo Don (talk) 00:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But it's not their current roster anymore. Don't fall asleep zzzzzz 11:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, whether he's fired, retires, dies, or is exposed as a Martian, he was a part of the 09 roster.  Pretty standard WP format for baseball teams, soccer teams, etc.  Vanishing him is inaccurate, from an encyclopedic POV.  The article doesn't purport to represent the team 'at this minute,' but rather the team's season.  --Smilo Don (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why keep Hamilton in the roster section? 
Talk:Michael Ball (fashion)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Fashion mogul Michael Ball. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 10#Fashion mogul Michael Ball until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fashion mogul Michael Ball" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nguyễn Bá Thanh

message: Nguyen Ba Thanh was also deputy head of the Central Steering Committee for Anti-corruption, led by Party General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong.
Anti-corruption leader Thanh is credited with transforming Da Nang from a poor area into one of the most beautiful cities in Vietnam. For many, it is the most livable city in the country. Da Nang is the only city without a beggar. The magnificent city is very clean and safe.
Loved by city residents, Nguyen Ba Thanh is famous for his tough stance on corruption, especially among traffic police, and is said to always deliver what he promises.  
Famous sayings by Nguyen Ba Thanh
“I say and I do” 
“The core issue is personal responsibility [not collective responsibility]" 
“In other countries, if there were that many robberies, the police chief must resign” 
“If you are tired, please raise your hands to resign”
“Officials these days must learn how to be ashamed”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.21.152.74 (talk) 14:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACHIEVEMENT 

message: As all information about the Controversies in the article has no proof of being happen. For me and most of Vietnamese, Nguyen Ba Thanh was a great leaders who built Da Nang to be one of the best place to live in Vietnam. And we are all grateful for that. 
The article, somehow, show the unproven part and do not give the full picture about his extraordinary life.
I would request the article to give more perspective, both for Vietnamese inside the country and abroad,
Best,
Tan Le
42.117.150.119 (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Stickee (talk) 05:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2015 

message: This article lacks neutrality. There are many heavily biased claims about Nguyen Ba Thanh, but the writer didn't talk about his contributions for Danang. Danang residents are proud of their city because there was a good council president made it better. This page also lacks of some important part about Nguyen Ba Thanh. For instance, his personal life, his health complications, and his famous sayings. This article might be better if putting some information that I listed above.  Morgan.nguyen123 (talk) 09:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Cần Giờ district

message: Need etymology. Badagnani (talk) 03:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Equitisation

message: Is the term not used by anybody outside of this seemingly narrow context? Working in corporate finance, I and others use this term regularly to refer to the conversion of all or part exposure to debt instruments, into equity as e.g. part of a corporate restructuring exercise. If this is an incorrect use, then I stand corrected!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.69.198.225 (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of the verified oldest people/Archive 3

message: The dates on this page update automatically. But they do not seem to update at 00.00 hours (Wiki time). It seems to happen later. Can anyone explain why? Alan Davidson 13:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed so, whereas over here in Belgium it's already 2 o'clock in the morning apparently. Extremely sexy 15:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have thought that at time 0:00 according to the Wiki time (which I understand is universal) the ages would be automatically updated.  But I have found that after 0:00 time (wiki time) - there is a lag. (For me it should be 10:00 am local time; even when the wiki clock shows 0:30, sometimes the ages have not been updated???) Alan Davidson 01:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update timing
Talk:List of current dependent territory leaders

message: Please explain why you insist on "rulers" in the title. It is patently wrong. To take just one example, Anguilla is ruled by, and has an head of state which is, the British crown. You have listed its head of government. Fabant, do you understand? For sovereign territories we use "heads of state and government". Why do you think dependencies should be different. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rulers

message: They are not dependent territories, should be removed from the list. --maxval (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  All of them are dependent territories. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Aland, Macau, Hong Kong, Svalbard

message: Is there a possibility that someone can rewrite those informations in chronological order like it is here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_leaders_by_date ?? I would like to do this by myself but I am not good enough in such Internet stuff  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TigerTatoo (talk • contribs) 14:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Found and put in a proper way of doing this (just need some more missing dates by month and/or number of date to list all correctly).That-Vela-Fella (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological order 

message:  218.250.159.25 (talk) 19:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Sawney

message: Samuel Johnson is routinely dismissed as a Scotophobe, but this should be taken with a grain of salt. He surrounded himself with Scotsmen such as Boswell, and five of his six aids in compiling his dictionary were Northerners or Scotsmen. In his dictionary he liberally points out Scots terminolgy. It seems that he enjoyed to play a Scotophobe, but it seems a playful, respectful hatred.
Ahassan05 (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it should be taken with a pinch of salt. He routinely made such comments, and liked Scots, as long as they agreed with him, or worked for him. He took an almost colonial attitude to them.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samuel Johnson not a Scotophobe 

message: 'Porridge Wog' should not be included in this article for two main reasons (A) it is an article about Sawney - 'Porridge Wog' does not really have any relevance to this - I'm sure we could all think of 50 more popular racial slurs for Scots - should they all be included? (B) Porridge Wog is not even a widely used term - I've never heard it before, and the citation provided for it is a comedy website that is hardly reputable. If 'Porridge Wog' should be mentioned anywhere it is in Wiktionary, not here.  If you can find a single reputable reference for the use of 'Porridge Wog' (and I don't mean Bebo) then by all means include it here - otherwise, it's just transient nonsense. 91.106.226.28 (talk) 22:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porridge Wog 

message: Article currently contains an uncited claim that Johnson's father was Scottish - cannot verify this anywhere. The best I can find is that he was born in Derbyshire . Again, it's of questionable relevance to the article's subject as is even the mention of Johnson himself. 91.106.226.28 (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Johnson 

message: I think we should be wary of casual use of the terms 'racist' in this context. 
The same goes for a word like 'Scotophobe,' which is as meaningless as  other terms currently deploying the suffix '-phobe.'
I suggest that terms such as  'prejudice' and 'hostile' are more appropriate and accurate.
 
JF42 (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A particularly racist example"
Talk:List of recurring Blue Heelers characters

message: There's no need to have each character shown as a section heading - the article is unnecessarily long.  I would suggest using bold characters and alphabetizing the list instead.  PKT (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After stumbling upon the Susie Raynor, and being amazed that it exists, I am going to (one day soon) redirect all of the minor cast characters to this list, unless some can show that they meet the WP:GNG as required by WP:FICT. Speak now if this is a bad thing, or revert later.The-Pope (talk) 14:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, after seeing this, I'm just going to do it now.The-Pope (talk) 14:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting of minor characters to here
Talk:Code Orange (novel)

message: This article, in short, is a disaster. It needs completely redone. It sounds like a preview with the question at the end. It also doesn't summarize the book in good detail or list its publishing date. Obviously a newbie misktake. Maybe we should delete this article and try again. --Oh no! it's Alien joe!(Talk) 22:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to fix it up from some earlier vandalism. It's now slightly better, and it actually summarises the plot of the book. Graham87 00:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs redone 

message: I've declined the PROD as I'm finding some coverage as well as a lot of evidence to show that this is fairly heavily used in classrooms. If this should be deleted, it should be through AfD. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work! Honestly when I read the notice that this article was being proposed for deletion, I thought "Yay! A vandal magnet on my watchlist will probably be deleted!", but the fact that this page has been vandalized so much is an indication of how widely the book is used, and an improved article is orders of magnitude better than a deleted one. Graham87 08:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

text: *I didn't even think about the vandalism aspect- I've noted that with books like the Wimpy Kid series, but I never really connected vandalism with how often a book is used in classrooms. I'll have to store that away in my mental cache of information I save for potential school papers. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Declined PROD
Talk:Vietnam's Green Corridor

message: Just went through this page, and I couldn't really find a lot of information on this after it was completed. Even sources from when it was happening were scarce, and at least one seems to no longer up. I believe that this event may not comply with WP:N(E), but I'd like opinions before going ahead with a merge or putting it up for deletion. Ships & Space(Edits) 17:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this notable?
Talk:Ministry of Planning and Investment

message: * 2005 INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT -- VIETNAM (U.S. Department of State) removed from article today and stowed here for reference. --Mr Accountable (talk) 04:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link not found
Talk:Vietnam University of Fine Arts

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI!  02:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Olympic Sliding Centre Innsbruck

message: The caption of first photo in the current version of this article says, "Four-man wok racing at the 2006 World Championships held at the track," with wok linked to the Chinese cooking vessel.  Can somebody please correct this?  PKT(alk) 22:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wok?
Talk:Romania/Rumania-Romania-Roumania poll

message: * Poll at close 19:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Narson, can you see any acceptable way to shorten or abbreviate the wording?  --Reuben (talk) 08:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

text: * "Archaism, the use of a form of speech or writing that is no longer current" Since 1% of Google results point to Rumania and 99% point to Romania and 100% current official documents and communiques use "Romania" (AFAIK) I think "archaic" describes the situation pretty well. Notice that archaism means "no longer current" it doesn't mean that you need to use archaeology tools to find such words... -- AdrianTM (talk) 23:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see discussion here.  There are still (a few, mostly older) people who use these versions of the names, so "archaic" is too strong.  In 50 or 100 years that may not be the case.  Right now, "dated" is more accurate.  --Reuben (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, "dated" is better choice. AdrianTM (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There may be other, better choices too... --Reuben (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

text: * Comment It's not quite invented, see here it's a clear needed category between "archaic" and "current" since it seems that "archaic" has a nuance of "really old", we need a word for "used in the past, nowadays not used in official documents anymore and rarely used in other settings" -- AdrianTM (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)