lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Summa Theologia

message: User:Wau2 moved "Summa Theologiae" to "Summa Theologica" and placed here a work by Alberus Magnus.   
It is not Albertus Magnus most famous work. And this title should be reserved to Aquinas' work. Any article on Albertus Magnus' work should bear the title "Summa Theologiae (Albertus Magnus)".   Andres 17:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I'm making the changes... David aukerman talk 19:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

message: To whom it may concern:  Please don't force Aquinas' work to the page entitled Summa Theologica and replace Summa Theologiae with Magnus' work.  There are far too many references on Wikipedia to Aquinas' work as "Summa Theologiae" which would subsequently be broken.  The disambiguation page at Summa Theologica is a good solution, provided someone create a Summa Theologica (Albertus Magnus) page for that man's work.  David aukerman talk 23:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Albertus Magnus' work is known under the title Summa theologiae rather than Summa theologica. Antoninus work is known under both names. I think that instead of disambiguation pages we need disambiguation links  to those other works in the beginning of this article. "Summa Theologica" is very often used about Aquinas' work, so it should redirect here. Andres 07:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Aquinas vs. Magnus

message: The previous discussion concerning this article is now under Talk:Summa Theologica. It should be restored here somehow. Andres 07:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The discussion page
Talk:Owen Brewster

message: Early Years
Ralph Owen Brewster, who preferred to be known by his middle name, was born in Dexter, Maine, the son of William Edmund Brewster, a member of the Maine House of Representatives, and Carrie S. Bridges. He was a direct lineal descendant of Love Brewster, a passenger aboard the Mayflower and a founder of the town of Bridgewater, Massachusetts; and of his father Elder William Brewster, the Pilgrim colonist leader and spiritual elder of the Plymouth Colony, and passenger aboard the Mayflower and one of the signers of the Mayflower Compact. Through this entirely paternal line Owen Brewster is descended from Mayflower compact signer William Brewster.
Serious readability issues here.  While reading I got the general idea that Owen Brewster was descended from two different Mayflower-related people, went back to figure out what the relationships were all about, considered that "Love" Brewster might have been female, wondered what a "contract signer" was, if maybe someone came over on the Mayflower and someone didn't, then saw "William Brewster" mentioned twice and wondered if this was a junior/senior thing but no it's the same William Brewster mentioned twice in the same paragraph.  At this point I gave up and came here to complain about it.  He's related to two people named Brewsters from the Mayflower (somehow) along paternal lines, and that's all I know.  What the relationship between "William" and "Love" might have been I have no clue.  If they both arrived on the Mayflower together, at different times or one or both simply signed some kind of contract, I have no idea. Suggest expanding the text and deal with each Brewster separately, and try to make some statement about their possible relationship.  I also think trying to increase the contrast between real history with the fictional movie would be a good thing.  Also cause of death could be mentioned.Tym Whittier (talk) 06:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Many Brewsters 

message: Brewster is commonly known by his full name. See . I could also be convinced that Ralph O. Brewster would be acceptable, see .--User:Namiba 16:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Common Name
Talk:Trametes versicolor

message: Source #4 indicating the ACA has spoken on the efficacy of this mushroom or its compounds, for cancer treatment, returns an irrelevant link, and needs to be updated  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadez03 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: BrokenSource

message: The external link returns a 404. I don't know whether the external link has moved or changed its address so not editing entry to remove.
This is a terrible picture of this fungus. Normally green is not found on it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.28.180.20 (talk) 22:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree the picture is atypical and have changed it to a more common one. I also removed another atypical image that was in the gallery showing larger than usual pore surface. I actually believe it was an image of another species, Trametes villosa, due the larger than usual pore size. --Dejitarob (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: When immature, prepare as any wild mushroom.
Mature, decoct under steam pressure for broth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.177.180 (talk) 16:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peparation of Trametes 

message: This revert was justified because there is no reputable review and no regulatory agency that acknowledge the mushroom itself, or the manufactured extract, PSK, as an anti-cancer or immune-enhancing compound. Such extraordinary claims require exceptionally strong sources, WP:EXCEPTIONAL, for which there is none - adhere to WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 21:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-cancer evidence 

message: — Assignment last updated by Wampumce (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Journal Club
Talk:Edward Bunting

message: The section The Ancient Music of Ireland (1840) does not belong in a biographical article - it needs to be moved or removed.--Hohenloh  +   22:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove or move section 

message: The plaque says he was the organist at St George's in Belfast, but the body text says he was the organist at St George's in Dublin. Are both correct, or have the two churches got confused? --A bit iffy (talk) 10:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Where was he an organist?
Talk:Oakland Mall

message: If someone knows or can find the other data for the info box, that would be good. I cannot seem to find the name of the property manager or holding company, although I haven't tried that hard--Mikerussell 17:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Borders and Steve & Barry's are anchors. Please don't remove them.
--User:TenPoundHammer
 
There is no reason to call Borders or Steve & Barry anchor stores. They in fact are very close to the real anchor tenants, S&B is just outside JC Penny, Borders is right next to Macy's, and have 1 floor each with limited retail space- Borders is accessible from the parking lot with its own door, but it cannot be termed an anchor store since restaurants often have outside doors. Plus a mall with S&B and Borders could not attract other tenants alone. These chains might be called "Featured" stores, but not anchors by the common retail commercial property definition. MC Sports was a large sports store but not an anchor store either, it was again right close to Hudson's and had one floor, was it even a chain?. Harmony House was just a record store with many locations through Detroit, including some in plazas, not even malls (John R. and 696 in Hazel Park used to have a HH in strip plaza as I recall before they all went belly-up)--Mikerussell 04:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen many other malls claim their Borders or S&B's stores as anchors, or at least "junior anchors". By definition, Borders tends to fall under the category of big box -- in my opinion, any form of big box in a mall counts as an anchor. And yes, MC Sports was (and still is) a chain. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Actions • Words))) 15:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't think Borders and S&B qualify as anchors, and I have never heard of "junior anchors", but I am far from an expert so I defer to your opinion. I did take out the coded note that I assume you put in there again, which really reads like you are so insecure about including Borders and S&B as anchors that you place some anonymous code commanding obedience. I don't think that sort of extra coding into the HTML is good wikipedia practice, what if everbody started doing it when they were too lazy to explain things on the DISCUSSION page? Plus, it may confuse, discourage newcomers, so I edited it out. --Mikerussell 16:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anchor store 

message: How many stores did it originally open with? MMetro (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:David Kočí

message: Does anyone have one of him with the Avalanche? There are none yet on Commons. --Something12356789101 (talk) 23:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Die Fantastischen Vier

message: this probably should mention collaboration with rahzel and the remix aphex twin did of them
:Hit the edit button and fire away! number29(Talk) 02:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the band celebrates their 20th anniversary today on 25th of July 2009 in Stuttgart.
A new album is in the making (source: the band). Production will start after the anniversary concert.
There will be a tribute album with well-known german bands interpreting past songs from the Fantastischen Vier, coming out in August.
There are plans producing an annual show in summer like the anniversary show (source: Fantastischen Vier management). 77.181.79.137 (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: missing

message: The first paragraph claims that Die Fantastischen Vier were among the first artists to rap in the German language together with Advanced Chemistry, and later it is claimed they were the first German language rap artist to chart. The source given is an book which I have no access to for checking, but regardless neither claim is remotely true. I've not edited in wikipedia for years, otherwhise I'd do it myself. But please  someone else remove them.
References:
The first German rap was "Rapper's Deutsch" by GLS United in 1980  - 12 years ahead of Fantastischen Vier! - , a cover version of "Rapper's Delight". It got to no 49 in the West German singles charts.
https://www.discogs.com/release/808261-GLS-United-Rappers-Deutsch
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.L.S.-United
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWU2xh8VafE
Admittedly it was a novelty record, but still it's a rap and it charted.
If no 49 isn't high enough, there was "Der Kommissar (song)" by Falco, recorded in 1982 and rose to no. 1 in 1982.
https://www.discogs.com/de/master/74687-Falco-Der-Kommissar-Helden-Von-Heute
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbuKg37HzeY
Falco is Austrian, but it's in the German language.
Another notable first was "Disco in der U-Bahn" by Rockhaus in 1983, the first East German rap.
https://www.discogs.com/de/release/2379180-Rockhaus-Disco-In-Der-U-Bahn-Die-Neue-Lehrerin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqNdSFPgvYg
Anorak2 (talk) 02:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not among the first groups to rap in German
Talk:Digitalism (band)

message: Where can I find their Bonus Tracks from Idealism album?  Do they give you the "code" if I download the album from iTunes?
I edited the section In popular culture and added the reference to the trailer of TrackMania found here. But I have searched high and low for that remix and now I am beginning to think that maybe it's not Digitalism after all. Could a real fan please help me out here? Is it really "Zdarlight" that is played in the trailer? The similarities are uncanny, so if it's not Digitalism it must be a rip-off... I96danma (talk) 13:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As seen with this edit, I reverted  per the additions being unsourced. I also warned him on his talk page about it. Instead of fixing the matter, Solmgmt chose to revert me. Arjayay came along and helped tackle Solmgmt's edits. I reverted everything again because this article falls under the WP:BLP policy and editors should respect that policy and the WP:Burden policy. Solmgmt, read those policies. If you keep adding all this unsourced material to the article, I will alert the WP:BLP noticeboard to this matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The material that was added looks to have been copy/pasted from this page. I went ahead and reverted to the version before Solmgmt began. Hopefully that doesn't make for too much of an inconvenience, but this seems like a pretty egregious example of both copyvio and COI. Note that "solmgmt" in addition to being the user adding the content is also the band's management company.  please note that company usernames are not allowed and that Wikipedia has strict rules about conflict of interest. Please do not edit the articles of bands you manage. If you would like, suggest improvements and provide reliable secondary sources on this talk page and other editors will make the changes for you (or advise you as to why the changes cannot be made). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:SAFC (disambiguation)

message: It doesn't matter if SAFC "mostly" refers to Sunderland A.F.C.. A redirect should only be used if SAFC refers exclusively  to Sunderland (which it doesn't). Therefore I have reverted it so that Stirling Albion F.C. can be included. I agree that Sunderland are more notable and will therefore move them to the top of the list. --Jameboy 17:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Undid redirect again. If evidence is required that SAFC can also stand for Stirling Albion F.C., see here. --Jameboy 22:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Despite my previous opposition, I am now happy for SAFC to redirect to Sunderland A.F.C., as it is the most notable use of the abbreviation. The resolution to the dispute, and the reason for my change of heart, is the disambig top link at the top of the Sunderland A.F.C. article, which points to SAFC (disambiguation). --Jameboy 23:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Footnote to the above - I understand disambiguation somewhat better since I made the above comments, although I'm still not totally convinced that Sunderland are the primary topic for SAFC. --Jameboy (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lady Chatterley (film)

message: In the plot subsection, Lady Chat "bids her husband, Clifford, goodbye as he goes off to war." The war was WWI, but "Clifford" is driving himself in a 4-door sedan car of the 1930s. Elsewhere the film accurately shows cars of the WWI era. There is no clear basis for any supposition about who the driver is or where he is going. Thoughts? Bjenks (talk) 04:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, there being no comments on this, I have revised the plot section to accord with what is actually in the film. Bjenks (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening scene problem
Talk:Grand High Witch

message: The book's article is shorter than this one, but neither is overlong.  Maybe we should combine them a bit? Vashti 17:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But the character has no existence outside the book.  The one is a subset of the other, whether it's a character or a title. Vashti 21:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[The Witches]]?
Talk:Kohinoor Theatre

message: WHERE IS PAPRI SAIKIA ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.242.172.61 (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

message: Kohinoor Opera is not same as Kohinoor Theatre. Kohinoor Opera was started in 1930 by Brajanath Sarma and was discontinued in 1936. Kohinoor Theatre was started in 1975 by Ratan Lahkar and has no relation to the earlier Kohinoor Opera. Moreover, Kohinoor Opera did not follow the current Mobile Theatre Trend, it was like a Jatra Party.উদ্দীপতালুকদাৰ (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirection 
Talk:Forest Preserve District of DuPage County

message: Was this article initially copied and pasted from http://www.dupageforest.com/index.html ? It reads like promo material. Most web materials are copyrighted unless otherwise stated, I would assume it to be copyrighted material. This article should probably be looked at more closely for copyvio. --Dual Freq 00:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 
Talk:Ron Stone (American football)

message: Should there be a disambiguation page directing this article to Ron Stone (football player) because there is a Ron Stone (reporter) ? VK35 22:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Page moved and disambiguation page created at Ron Stone. ●DanMS • Talk 00:20, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments: Requested move
Talk:Turkish Islamic Jihad

message: Editor attempting to connect a picture of a soldier in WW1 holding a flag with an organisation in the late twentieth century. Unless editor can prove the article and the image are linked (through an authoratative source) then i'm going to remove it. --A.Garnet 18:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can fine the book here,  Artaxiad 19:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't matter. No relevance between a supposed flag with a 90s organization. Do not confuse the notion of jihad in the religious sense with the specific name of a group. Baristarim 20:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

text: There the same thing. Artaxiad 00:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are not. From an academic point of view, you have to establish the direct relationship with that flag that Turks supposedly flew in WWI and a 90s terrorist organization. If you look at it that way, Turkish Hezbollah would be the same as Hezbollah of Lebanon. Just because somehow they carry the same name doesn't mean they are related, even if that flag was a banner commonly used by Turks in WWI, which is still some speculative OR. Jihad in WWI and the 90s didn't have the same meaning either. That's all. Baristarim 01:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

text: So are you saying a separate article is better? Artaxiad 01:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, but what exactly would be on those articles? We already have so many underutilized articles that it might be better adding stuff into the existing ones, unless they are about a specific and seperate topic. Baristarim 01:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image is OR
Talk:Projekt-26

message: The abolition was not because "the clandestine organization operated outside of parliamentary and even governmental control, being an autonomous structure hidden inside the secret military services", nor was this the reason given at the time. As an agency of the military it did operate under government control. The reason for abolition was that having been exposed its role was compromised.Royalcourtier (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abolition
Talk:Turner Broadcasting System

message: I can't find any source that says that Turner Broadcasting was renamed as "Turner Entertainment Networks." I see two passing references to "Turner Entertainment Networks" in news blurbs, but I don't see anything connecting "Turner Entertainment Networks" to "Turner Broadcasting System." Unless there is a specific source that connects the two, this article should probably be moved back to "Turner Broadcasting System" (and even if there is, "Turner Broadcasting System" is probably the better name per WP:COMMONNAME). Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not to mention that, according to the article, "As of 2020, AT&T reported the financial results for WarnerMedia's ad-supported cable networks under the Turner business unit." So, in other words, Turner Broadcasting technically doesn't exist anymore as any kind of actual operating business. 2600:1700:C960:2270:3454:504:4A86:F7A8 (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I also don't find mentions of that name anywhere on the Web. In other words, HBO and Turner networks have been absorbed into WarnerMedia's and WBD's several units. 79.16.235.72 (talk) 16:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Turner Entertainment Network"? 

message: What? 84.15.181.118 (talk) 17:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...
Talk:Subtractor

message: the truth table for full subtractor is not correct; read this => http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~dfg/hardware/HardwareLecture13.pdf   60.48.175.38 (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Subtractor 

message: The diagram should be replaced such that the X input is the minuend and Y is the subtrahend. Doing it this way would make the diagram consistent with the article and the following explanation unnecessary:
An important point worth mentioning is that the half subtractor diagram aside implements Y - X and not X - Y since B_\text{out} on the diagram is given by
:B_{\text{out}} = X \cdot \overline{Y}.
This is an important distinction to make since subtraction itself is not commutative, but the difference bit D is calculated using an XOR gate which is commutative.
We could still have a footnote that says whichever input is inverted is the minuend. --Usability (talk) 07:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half subtractor diagram
Talk:Frog Island, Leicester

message: Frog Island includes The Old Mill.  Owned by Elvis Hughes this is starting to be a centre for alternative Arts and Artistic endeavours.  Originating as a tie 'twix the owner and a group of De Montfort students in '05 it has seen several brilliant exhibitions by painters, instalation artists and latterly drama performers.  A night there listening to the raw sound of a single acoustic guitarist singing his composition " Arabica" or "Lying" was brilliant...18:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Betty Catroux

message: According to the Who's Who in France (2004-2005 edition), François Catroux married Elisabeth Lange on December 26, 1967 (2 children:Maxime and Daphné).
No sign of Betty Saint...(86.68.227.134 (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pier Paolo Polcari

message: The article asserts its notability through its connection with Almamegretta.  There are numerous bands which have independent articles for its respective members, and I fail to see how this should be any different.  This should not be considered for speedily deletion so long as the band's article continues to exist. Should it be deemed that Almamegretta is non-notable (and I do not see how that could be so), then this may continue to be pursued for deletion. --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 18:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion nomination
Talk:Alexander Zaïd

message: The story that Zaid discovered the remains of Beit She'arim dates from the 1930s and is widely reported.  The problem is that the archaeological significance of the Sheik Bureik/Abreik hill was already known.  The report of the Survey of Western Palestine published in 1881 has a long description of it (see pages 325-328 and 343-351).  SWP did not recognise the site as Beit She'arim, but neither did Zaid (that honor is due to Benyamin Mazar in 1936).  So it seems that Zaid can at most be said to have re-discovered the ruins. Zerotalk 10:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery of Beth She'arim ruins
Talk:Polcari

message: Talk:Polcari
Polcari a.k.a. Pier Paolo Polcari a.k.a. Paolo Polcari is a well none musical producer,
he has almost 20 years of experience in the field and he is been producing music beetwen Italy and UK working for the most important major labels (BMG, SONY, UNIVERSAL) and collaborated with some of the most influnceal artists of the last decades (Bill Laswell, Massive Attack, Zion Train, Adrian Sherwood).
Pier Paolo Polcari
pppolcari@hotmail.com
:Only one article is needed, not two. Perhaps redirect to the other one you created. Furthermore, are you creating biographies about yourself? CascadiaTALK|HISTORY 18:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Airlines of Colombia

message: Here is the correct hyperlink (not sure how to change it)
http://www.searca.com.co/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.130.111 (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searca - wrong hyperlink 

message: This option is satisfactory when visually comparing samples superb to well a uniform specified reference  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.240.163.34 (talk) 20:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  consciously approach may be ideal