lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Combined Associated Schools

message: Anyone got a CAS logo to add to the page. Can't find any on the web
Moa999 10:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, ONLY the CAS logo can go on this article under Wikipedia's Fair Use policies. All the school logos should be removed, their being on this article opens the way for the images to be deleted (not just removed from this article, but deleted).Garrie 22:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How would removing any of these logos open the way for them to be deleted?  Each of these schools has an article where the logo is certainly appropriate under fair use.  Logos are the way an organisation wishes to be referred to; could someone point me to a discussion on why it is not fair use to use the logo in an article such as this?  Note that some of these crests may not even be copyright any longer. John Vandenberg 12:55, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per discussions on talk:Public Schools Association, the images need to be removed from this because it doesnt consitute fair use. It is ok to have them on the individual school articles, but not here. They are in no way being deleted. They are just being removed from this article. Note: I have done this throughout the :Category:Australian schools associations. Cheers. Twenty Years 13:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of whether some of the schools dont have pages, it looks ugly with only some of the schools having pics in the table, so theyve all been deleted. Twenty Years 13:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An alternative solution could have been to upload images of the other schools. John Vandenberg 13:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

text: (edit conflict) One user saying "per the Non Free content criteria policy section 3, 8 and 10" is hardly a detailed discussion.  Section 3 doesnt seem applicable for trademarks as its intend is to minimise how much of the copyright material is used, while logos should be used in their entirety and in reasonably high quality; using logos in tables does help readers so removing them per 8 is also a bold call, and 10 merely requires that images have been appropriate described, which anyone can fix (i.e. does not related to using logos in tables such as this article).  A related discussion can be found here: Wikipedia:Fair_use/Historical_logos_in_galleries. (I'm still looking...) John Vandenberg 13:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to be perfectly honest, i wouldnt know what the policies are regarding it. But i am following direction from that discussion which i mentioned. That person is an administrator, and highly respected WA admin. I would ask him for further clarification. Twenty Years 13:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logos
Talk:Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL 6.3

message: It states the production run was 1968–1972, but that simply isn't true. I have a 1992 300SEL. I cant find any information on my car on wikipedia (although there are pics of the 1992 300SEL on the internet).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.167.230 (talk) 11:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Run 

message: I made it so that when you type "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6.3" into the address bar, it redirects here. if anyone has problems with this, leave a comment either below or at the said page.
--08:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  6.3 redirect 

message: My dad had an early 300SEL that was imported used from Germany.  I did the maintenance on it.  I bought two shop manuals, one for the 300 sedan and one for the 600 limo.
I needed the 600 shop manual for the engine.  The car had a mechanical fuel injector.  To adjust the fuel injector, I had to stand next to the fender facing forward, place my hand down between the engine and the inside fender, turn away from the car so my hand could curl up to turn the knurl knob.  There was almost no room around the engine.  In general it was difficult to work on.  Some of the Zerk points were completely hidden and needed a long bent grease gun extension. The oil pan was so strong, I could use a floor jack on it to lift the front of the car.
Going down the Interstate you could do 120 without realizing you were speeding.  Saltysailor (talk) 17:33, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  working on a 300SEL
Talk:Nuclear Overhauser effect

message: The NOE page has languished for sometime without significant improvements that include more instructive detail. But it seems the NMR scholars are disinterested in improving Wikipedia pages, at least this one.  Nevertheless, the number of page views daily is ca. 100 and many people are directed by Google to Wikipedia, although there are many good on-line resources.  I have endeavored to rewrite the page based on standard sources and books.  Please proof-read, make corrections, improvements and additions, but try to keep encyclopedic. Tachyon (talk) 13:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major re-write
Talk:Plague

message: Should there be an entry on plagues of animals, e.g. mice plagues?
: Done. --David Broadfoot (talk) 14:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagues of animals

message: I have re-arranged the was Plague was treated navigationally.
*Plague now redirects to Plague (disambiguation), this may change in the future (I'm not bothered at the moment).
*All the instacnes of the Bubonic plague are now on List of Bubonic plague outbreaks (this list was previously at Plague).
These changes may be confusing and I'm happy to disucss them. --Commander Keane 10:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, discussion about this is occuring at Talk:List of Bubonic plague outbreaks--Commander Keane 05:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that my comments above have been altered. The piping used was introduced by another editor. When I orginially wrote it there was no piping.--Commander Keane 01:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major re-arrange

message: I removed the link to 'obesity plague'. I think that, even with a reference, it's too remotely removed from the purposes of a disambiguation page, since 'plague' is used to refer to all numbers of unpleasant things, but people aren't necessarily going to go searching for them using the word 'plague'. (I could provide plenty of links to: 'plague of cell phones!' and that's just the first example I thought of.) Marieblasdell 00:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  I've been tempted to do so for a while! (John User:Jwy talk) 03:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obesity plague 

message: The band Today I Caught The Plague is also refrenced in this article, im not sure why my description of the band was constantly removed. All i was trying to do was to elaborate on this group, if you still find that this information is irrelevant, i will let the topic of the page be.Innerprimate (talk) 22:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Today I Caught The Plague

message: So, what makes this more logical?  Alphabetical is more encyclopedic?  WBardwin 20:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logical arrangement?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
* :Plague → 
* :Plague (disease) → 
– becausde clearly the disease is the primary meaning. Lembit Staan (talk) 09:11, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: And beating the runner-up by a wiiiide margin. Lembit Staan (talk) 21:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 September 2021
Talk:Snow, Glass, Apples

message: Definitely one of the best short stories ever written (IMHO) --Slashme 10:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be nice to demonstrate this in the article with material to astablish levels of notability. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Actually, the addition of "pedophilia" to the list of themes treated is not really vandalism.  The author makes a point of describing the Snow White character as a "child", in my opinion enhancing the unnatural nature of the prince's attraction towards her. --Slashme (talk) 06:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you find a source where someone else says this?  As it stands, it appears to be original research. (Whether correct or not, our opinions about a subject are not permitted in an article.) Aleta (talk) 13:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well in the description of the encounter with the monk in the woods, the text says "she was twelve" and "One hand crept, spider-like, through the tangle of hair, until it closed on his manhood; the other hand traced a circle on his left nipple. He closed his eyes, and fumbled one huge hand under her skirt." which seems to me so clear as to rise above the level of OR. --Slashme (talk) 14:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Can someone remove the  tag, please? They are obviously all true. 122.2.84.198 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would, but I added some of them, so I think it would be bad form.  You, however, are free to do so.  WP:Be bold. --Slashme (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedophilia?
Talk:The Informers

message: I removed the copyvio taken straight from an Amazon reviewer Ian Cairns 10:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: In the description of the short story up the escalator it says that the main character goes to a psychologist and somehow gets a prescription for valium from him or her, this is not correct since a psychologist cannot prescribe medicatios so she went to a psychiatrist I have changed it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.54.15 (talk) 08:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Up Escalator changed from psychologist to psychiatrist
Talk:Haldane's dilemma

message: First, it should be noted that many anti-evolution arguments fixate on Haldane's observations as evidence against evolution. This is visible in the references, which include some anti-evolutionary articles. I suggest moving the creatinist references into their own section explaining the importance of this topic in anti-evolutionism.
Second, this puzzle was solved by Kimura's neutral theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Neutral_Theory_of_Molecular_Evolution). See also this article (https://inference-review.com/article/the-neutral-theory-of-evolution). It seems critical to include discussion of this connection in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.207.136.42 (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Neglects to Mention Kimura's Resolution

message: ...the problem [of Haldane's dilemma] was never solved, by Wallace [soft selection] or anyone else. It merely faded away, because people got interested in other things. They must have assumed that the true resolution lay somewhere in the welter of suggestions made by one or more of the distinguished population geneticists who had participated in the discussion.
George C. Williams, Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges, 1992, p 143-148
Why should this point of view not be reflected in the article?  Why the mythology that Haldane's Dilemma was settled?
Do people defending the current version of the article not find this a bit awkward? 70.16.207.189 (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Update, I added a reference to G.C. Williams discussion on Haldane's Dilemma to the article.
This is a mainstream scientific journal article dealing directly with the subject and it should be included.
Williams clearly views Haldane's Dilemma as a challenge, as recently as the 1990's.  Anyone who is skeptical of this can read the article for themselves here:  http://books.google.co.in/books?id=nTJlZ9QTssYC&pg=PA145&lpg=PA145&focus=viewport&vq=Haldane%27s+Dilemma
"I think the time has come for a renewed discussion and experimental attack on Haldane's Dilemma"
72.73.109.8 (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't much to discuss. We all make simple mistakes. Williams simply overlooked the fact mentioned in the introduction: "while sexual recombination means that two can be selected simultaneously so that both reach fixation more quickly".  MvH (talk) 17:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1992 - eminent evolutionary biologist G.C. Williams declares Haldane's Dilemma never solved
Talk:Casa Zimbabwe

message: This is Greg Vassilakos again.  I added text regarding Heidi's room and the segregation of the wings by gender during the early years of the building.  When I was a resident in the early 1980s, Heidi's room was not assigned as a dorm room.  Any resident could sign up to use Heidi's room if they needed peace and quiet.  The fact that the west wing was originally intended to be all male was evidenced by the existence of urinals in the restrooms.  Urinals were absent from the east wing restrooms.  All this may have been obliterated by remodeling since I last entered the building in 1983.
- Greg V.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg christine (talk • contribs) 00:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

message: I've proposed deletion for this article.  There's nothing in it which indicates significant notability outside that of the coop system as a whole, and the content in this article is duplicated in the Berkeley Student Cooperative article.  Argyriou (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed some of the original research and provided several references for the article. I realize at some point there were articles for most of the houses and that most of them were merged with the BSC article. However, I believe that Casa Zimbabwe has received significant coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG and I'm removing the prod for now. Gobonobo T C 06:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed deletion 

message: I've began moving historical details from the general Berkeley Student Cooperative page to here, there is way too much detail on the BCS page. Rybkovich (talk) 05:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now citing info and also taking out redundant and non objective info. View history for details Rybkovich (talk) 02:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving details from the BCS page to here
Talk:The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia (film)

message: This is a 1981 film and should not be speedy deleted. I will be removing the speedy tag. jnothman talk 11:31, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ame Tomoe

message: Ok, so "Ame" is her given name and "Tomoe" is her family name? I thought it was the other way around. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 11:40, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, that's backwards. See her official bio page: http://www.usagiyojimbo.com/characters/tomoe.html Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 11:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page never sawes she is a cat. Smurai Cerberus 20:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cat
Talk:Archery at the 1988 Summer Olympics

message: Cleanup: All flags should be replaced with svg flags. // Fred-Chess 11:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

message: All four events are here with detail. It makes this article huge and for later olympics each event gets its own page. Qwerty786 (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this article should be broken up 

message: How to be a traffic 41.114.198.30 (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic
Talk:Pensions in the United Kingdom

message: I'll finish this when I'm not so busy.
Simon West 11:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I've had a careful read and a tidy up of this.  As far as I can see it is now accurate and of about the right length.  I've therefore deleted the clean up tags. --Phil Holmes (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I inserted here the historical ("peculiar") information which was located in the Pension article.  I'm not sure how accurate it is, and it probably needs to be trimmed down, but it definitely was out of place in the general article.  For now at least, I think this is a better home.
Dhollm (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical information 

message: There seems to be some lack of clarity about when and the extent to which civil service pensions became a standard concept. I claim no expertise in the subject but Rudyard Kipling's In the Rukh, the first of the Mowgli stories, was published in 1893 and he felt comfortable having a character say, without any explanation, "Would it not be better to work for pay from the Government? There is a pension at the end of long service." Text This hardly appears to jibe with the article's descriptions of, e.g., Civil List Pensions. Also, an industrious party might wish to incorporate some of the great information in this page into the sadly lacking Timeline of pensions in the United Kingdom. Czrisher (talk) 02:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on Civil Service Pensions 

message: Please can you check a pension of mine which I have come across in my name Teresa Ann Langford DOB 23/1/1953 thank you Teresa Langford (talk) 00:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical pension
Talk:Splayd

message: Aren't splades fairly dangerous, seeing that your putting a knife in your mouth?
:I assume that, like knorks, the "cutting" edge is unsharpened like a butter knife.  I hope! Yanqui9 23:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... Norks is slang for breasts. Never had any trouble with them being too sharp!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.239.184 (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

text: The edge is not sharp, just tapered slightly, we had some of these made by Viners of Sheffield in the draw at home when I was a youngster, will see if can track down reference to them or get Photo of makers mark. Not sure whether they bought the design or the just UK rights to manufacture them. --BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Older discussion

message: A photo of just a single utensil would be useful to demonstrate its shape and function more clearly. 76.189.148.151 (talk) 03:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Added a photo of a splayd on a plate beside a small pie. Geoff Say something!  23:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better photo 

message: for obvious reasons FiveRings (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  It appears the sporf article was created as a fork (no pun intended) of this one.  There is no need for a separate article. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

text: furthermore, I would ask, what did William McArthur name his invention? Despite it being a trade name, if splayd was what he named his invention, then that is what it should be called.  Cybergothiche (talk) 02:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  propose merge [[sporf]] into this article 

message: The Powerhouse Museum's  page on the splayd has a great image of the prototypes. Anyone in the Haymarket Sydney region that could take their own CC photo of this, at the museum, for our use here? -- Quiddity (talk) 01:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powerhouse Museum's prototypes
Talk:Ainulindalë

message: The lead says that Tolkien started writing it in 1919, down in the article it says 1918. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 17:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The work may have ended up as a chapter in The Silmarillion as published by Christopher Tolkein, but as written by JRR Tolkein it was a separate manuscript.  In a letter to Katherine Farrer concerning manuscripts he sent her for review  he wrote "I have ventured to include besides the 'Silmarillion' or main chronicle, one or two other connected 'myths': 'The Music of the Ainur', ...".  But whatever, I was merely making the title conform to the lead sentence which italicises it. SpinningSpark 10:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hm, yes, but Tolkien wrote many hundreds of manuscripts; the nearest comparison would be books of short stories, where each one is a separate manuscript and could indeed be a published work, say in a newspaper or magazine, but we treat the stories as un-italicised parts of a book all the same. However, the italics do make sense for Quenya, as I already said in the edit comment, so I pointedly didn't revert you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italics 
Talk:WOW HD

message: Article rescued from goddamn spammers. i'm not sure even a tabloid writer could stand how warm and fuzzy a picture the original author painted of the company/site. not complete, but it's a start. a start that was a result of my own interest of whether they were legit or not in my search for the Prodigy DVD. a dvd that was like 15£ from XL Recordings. i'm comfortable buying from CD WOW! now that i've found out the story ^_^ —— Plonk420 12:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Underground Crown Holders

message: I have bulleted rather than numbered the tracks on Disc 2, because as far as I am aware there are only 4 cd tracks on the disc. As I haven't picked up this CD yet, I don't know where each track starts and ends. If someone knows, or once I get the CD, I guess it should be updated to show which songs come under each of the tracks.
E.g. 
1. Grand Central 10 (A Special Anniversary Mix) Part 1
* Concentrate (First Priority Drum edit) - Aim 
* Divine Sounds - Rae & Christian 
* Atomic Drop - Fingathing 
* Phantasm - Aim 
* Swimming Pool - Rae & Christian 
* 24/7 - Funky Fresh Few 
2. Grand Central 10 (A Special Anniversary Mix) Part 2
* Bumpin (Dub) - The Nudge 
* Lavish (featuring Veba) (Deadbeats Mix) - Mark Rae 
* It Ain’t Nothing Like (featuring The Pharcyde) (Kriminul A Cappella) - Rae & Christian 
* Downstate - Aim 
* Space Disco (Latino Beats) - Only Child 
* Free Rollin' - Mark Rae 
etc
The track times for the 4 tracks on disc 2 are:
# Part 1 (14:50)
# Part 2 (13:32)
# Part 3 (18:29)
# Part 4 (12:50)
Gram 09:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disc 2 bulleted
Talk:Sea of Reeds

message: Source of this "pop culture" error turns out to be a "pop" itself: answers.com
Rabbi Shraga Simmons writes:
:The name of the body of water was called the Sea of Reeds, often mistranlsated as Red Sea. But the Sea of Reeds was a deep body of water, and tunnels opened up for the Jews to walk through. 
I don't think Wikipedia should flatly contradict religious tradition on the basis of one rabbi's reading of the texts. Uncle Ed 12:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)