Talk:Zaira (opera)

message: Why was this page moved from Zaira (opera) to Zaira (Bellini)? The edit summary says: "There exist different operas titled Zaira" — which ones? Also: The Wikiproject Opera's guidelines are quite clear against such a move. I suggest  revert this move. Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There do exist other Zaira operas by Peter Winter, Saverio Mercadante and Antonio Caldara, But apart from the Mercadante, there is very little information about them and the Bellini Opera is the better known of the lot. None of the other operas have articles. However, this move was contrary to the guidelines used by the Opera Project, e.g. Otello for the Verdi opera, and the first article written (2002) and the better known opera, and Otello (Rossini) for the one by Rossini written (2005). It also messed up the template. I'm not sure what User:Jeanambr did, but it was producing a double redirect on this page. I've sort of fixed it, but not completely. It's a real mess. Jeanambr, in future please do not move long-established pages without first discussing it with other editors on the talk page and preferably also at the Opera Project. For now, I'm not going to revert the move because I'm afraid of making even more of a mess. Since this applies to the general guidlines about ariticle naming at the Opera Project, I suggest continuing the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera. Voceditenore (talk) 08:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

text: *Update. I've solved the problem of the template. Jeanambr had failed to refresh the Zaira (Bellini) page so it was producing a double re-direct. Likewise, the template in all the other Bellini opera articles was linking to a redirect. I've now gone through and refreshed them all, so at least that problem is solved. But this page move was contrary to long established naming conventions for operas and I am very inclined to revert it, especially since it was done with no prior discussion whatsoever. The relevant discussion on the Opera Project talk page can be found here. Voceditenore (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.operatoday.com/content/2011/08/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the entire Synopsis which was copied verbatim from the source above. Voceditenore (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed