lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Southern Manifesto

message: This title should be Southern Manifesto not The Southern Manifesto, as repeadtedly is errors are made when linking to this page.  The Voting Rights Act and The Civil Rights Act of 1964 are similiarly not titled as such — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nobs (talk • contribs) 18:51, 30 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Title

message: Here is an interesting fact:
Lyndan Johnson, who was at that time the senate majority leader, was never asked to sign, nor did he receive the document. Legislators felt his devotion to Civil Rights would stand in their way. Minche, 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minche (talk • contribs) 03:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is relevant to the article (which mentions that Johnson did not vote, but does not mention his Civil Rights efforts at the time). If there were a citation we could add it to the article... (will try to dig one up myself) babbage (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting fact

message: The "Signatories and Non-Signatories" section is completely confusing. I was left with very little idea who signed. Can someone impose clear order on the lists? And maybe some whitespace? The paragraph also mentions "below," but presumably means not immediately below but distantly below. HTH. —Christian Campbell 00:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the list is not readable as-is. A side-by-side presentation would be better. Also, the presetn layout suggests that all Congress members are listed for all states; is this the case? babbage (talk) 19:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Having reviewed the Wikipedia list against the signers to the document (found in an NPR archive) it looks like Martin Dies of Texas is the odd signer on the Wikipedia list.  Did he sign?  It doesn't seem to be covered in the article about DiesArnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also, Charles R. Jonas (R, NC) seems to be missing from the list of non-signers.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 01:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signatories and Non-Signatories 

message: I suggest making a link at this phrase to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.179.75 (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  States' rights 

message: The article says "Senators led the opposition, with Strom Thurmond writing the initial draft and Richard Russell the final version".
But Senator Thurmond co-wrote the first draft of the Southern Manifesto which is also clear from Thurmond's article.  How could he have led the opposition to it?  Obviously something is unclear here, or else I am just confused.  Help...  73.127.147.187 (talk) 03:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused about "opposition"
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams 2/Evidence

message: When the message on my talk page was posted, I was editing the proposed re-working of List of songs whose title includes geographical names at user:Thryduulf/Geonamesongs. Doing this involves looking up lots of place name articles, and so I saw the orange 'You have new messages' banner very soon after you posted. When I finished the section I was working on (English Ph-Pz) I read the message and responded. After this afternoon I will only have intermittent access to the internet unitl Thursday evening (all GMT) and so I needed to get it done.
::I was referring to the editing elsewhere - i.e. immediacy of response to pages other than your talk page. Most people take a while. user:218.22.44.244
:::I react to things when I see them, whenever that happens to be. You are from the UK, I am from the UK, it follows therefore it is not unlikely we will be editing WP at similar times. Also, every page I edit is in my watchlist, which is always the first page I view when begining a WP session, and I refresh it many times during a session (yes, I'm a Wikipediaholic). Thryduulf 00:22, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: immediacy of response

message: I don't know what Rienzo's edits are like or what his or her behaviour has been, outside of comments in this RFAr. The check of contribution histories shows we've never been involved with the same article (see below) so I've never come accross them previously.
::Contribution histories being different is what I would expect from a planned sock puppet - throws people off the scent. Rienzo's contributions  are quite different from :sv:User:LouiseR, yet they are the same person. What is important in matching identity is behaviour.user:218.22.44.244
:::By that logic I could accuse you of being a planned sockpuppet of me, or user:JeffQ of being a sockpuppet of user:Nickj. You cannot claim that both similarity of edits and differences in edits as being inidcators of the same thing. You have failed to give any examples of when my behviour has been alledgly similar/the same as user:Rienzo. Thryduulf 00:22, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: similarity of behaviour to Rienzo

message: I deny that I have been persuing you. I follow many RFAr cases, and if I can provide any evidence to the committee I do so (as is specifically asked). Previous to this case I had no interaction with you at all.
::Previous to this case you had no interaction with RFAr at all. Secondly, Rienzo had no interaction with me prior to his abrupt appearance on WP:RFC, so that is hardly proof at all, quite the contrary. user:218.22.44.244
:::Your first point is not backed up by facts. See  
   and other edits. I cannot comment on your interactions with Rienzo as I have no involvement with them (outside of this Arbitration request). Thryduulf 00:22, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: persuit of CheeseDreams

message: You asked for opinions from non-admin and non-arbcom members. I fit the criteria, and so gave mine.
::So does Rienzo. user:218.22.44.244
:::So do >99.99% of the registered users of wikipedia. Thryduulf 00:22, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 14th feb edit to RFAr page
Talk:Periwinkle (color)

message: "Hex triplet = #CCCCFF <BR>
RGB    (r, g, b)    =  (195, 205, 230)"
If you change the RGB into Hex triplet, you get #C3CDE6. <BR>
If you change the Hex triplet into RGB, you get (204, 204, 255).
Daniel 21:57, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color conversion and accuracy 

message: the OED lists a use of periwinkle as a color from 1852 (Harper's) and another from 1902 (Western Gazette), one referring to the color of cloth and the other to the color of the sea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.250.112 (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect date 

message: On 28-Mar-2013, a number of cultural references to periwinkle were removed. Is there a reason for the retention of the Blue's Clues reference, which explains why it was kept while other references were removed? If no reason is there, then the editing was arbitrary, which serves nobody, and I vote for undoing this edit. Thoughts? 
Jpbjoel (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the cultural references have been removed? 

message: Removed following from the page:
::Comment: The specs in this box are different than the periwinkle specs on the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variations_of_blue#Light_blue. One or both need correction.
Made  by 68.6.45.73 at 17:14, 10 August 2012‎ 
Balko Kabo (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed comment 

message: Periwinkle is both an animal and a flower. According to Color Sorting on Wikia, the color Periwinkle is named after the animal, but according to Wikipedia, it is named after the flower. Is the color Periwinkle actually named after the flower, after the snail, or after both. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 23:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after the flower 

message: In the cultural references, I'd argue the reference to a Harry Potter character's dress isn't noteworthy, beyond the fact that blue sets off red air nicely. The other reference at least shows that a fascination with fussy shades of blue bespeaks a certain kind of character, and seems noteworthy. I'm going to remove Herminone's dress. 24.63.57.12 (talk) 01:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potter seems unnecessary 

message: An entry in List of colors: G–M contained a link to this page.
The entry is :
* Light periwinkle
I don't see any evidence that this color is discussed in this article and plan to delete it from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries
If someone decides that this color should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible removal from list
Talk:Tupolev Tu-160

message: Since this originated in the Soviet Union, should we strike Russia from it? No question that Russia is the successor the the USSR, but it does't seem to be the origin.Garuda28 (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't take origin so literally. In this sense, it means the nations it comes from or are responsible for it, not the first-ever nation. - BilCat (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Gotcha, wasn't sure if there was a precedence for this on other aircraft articles, since the Soviet Union/Russia is our only case of this happening in recent history. Thanks!Garuda28 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's the original intent of the parameter anyway, and how I continue to interpret it. Russia is doing major upgrades of their T-160s, and might resume production if needed, so it's clearly their aircraft too. And there's certainly a strong argument that Russia is the successor to the Soviet Union, as the former made up the bulk of the latter's land area and population. - BilCat (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Antonov was an Ukrainian, Tupolev Russian. The continunity exists. 62.78.205.143 (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  National origin 

message: It links here from a list of Tu planes, but there's no mention of it. I demand this be done. GMRE (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tu-170?

message: There is a common knowledge, that the Russian federation had 16 Tupolev Tu-160's, Tu-160M1's and Tu-160M2's. How ever since the Ukrainians strome to the Engels AFB, 30 Tupolevs can be seen in the Google Earth satellite photograph in Vernnyi AFB in the Murmans oblast. It would be interesting to know, what are the remaising 13 and what types they represent. 2001:14BA:6408:AB00:CD45:302A:4BDB:A8F5 (talk) 15:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Register and port
Talk:Sowelu

message: Fullmetal Alchemist produced by TBS? I believe it was shown on TV Tokyo in Japan, not some American station. The words that are in italics for this article are also in dire need of direct links to other articles related to them. Can somebody clarify this?
*TBS stands for Tokyo Broadcasting System. I'll clean up the article a bit for clarity (and brevity in some parts). --Alex¯Jon 19:03, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If someone can read Japanese, this interview may be a useful reference. Mark Hurd (talk) 15:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Sputnik 3

message: This article should be retitled 'Sputnik 3' to mirror the naming convention used by the other Sputnik launches.--Hooperbloob 23:23, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the reference for the time of launch?  V.V. Poroshkov's book on Baikonur (used as an authoritative source for precise launch log records) gives the launch time at 7:00:35.5.  DonPMitchell (talk) 06:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch time 

message: The impending possible deletion of the "Sputnik Program" page has caused the transfer of information, citation and references while they still inhabit cyberspace.Mark Lincoln (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Information 

message: Starts talking about this craft (as object D) on page 151:
https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4408pt1.pdf
©Geni (talk) 04:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: further information on page 175.©Geni (talk) 04:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Challenge to Apollo
Talk:Sophia Charlotte of Hanover

message: Could this be moved to Sophia Charlotte of Hanover in line with similar entries? --Wetman 23:26, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the english article she was born on October 20, 1668 and died on January 21, 1705. Accoding to the german article :de:Sophie Charlotte von Hannover she was born on October 30, 1668 and died on February, 1 1705. -- 20:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth & death 

message: In Germany she is always known as "SophiE" (not "-a"). Is there a reason you would list a person in a reference work not under HER name precisely in the form she heard and used during her life ?
Reading "of Hannover" I'd get the impression she was the ruling or First lady there, and not in Berlin, as was the case. Is that a general convention, contrary to my expectation ?
147.142.186.54 13:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: More people would certainly remember her for the castle her husband had built for and named after her: Charlottenburg ! And the whole district (ca.180 000 inhabitants) of Berlin "around it" received the same name.
147.142.186.54 13:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Remembered for ..."
Talk:Duchy of Lorraine/Archive 1

message: I've moved the page to Duchy of Lorraine because that seems a more appropriate location, in that it discusses the history of the duchy itself. john k 23:33, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Who moved this page here?  Lorraine is by far the more common English name. john k 20:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Duchy of Lotharingia??
Talk:Peine forte et dure

message: Is this practice part of the etymology of the term oppression?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.198.30.48 (talk) 06:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase (as indicated) is in Law French, hence why it doesn't conform to any French standard, old or new. It may be that the Anglo Norman language did allow such marking on fort. I wouldn't worry about it to be honest. Oswax 07:30, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Indeed you are strictly correct, it was more properly "abolished in the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1772" - but it remains abolished in the successor state the United Kingdom.
----
I have added a link under 'See Also' to Asphyxia. As described, peine forte et dure causes death by asphyxia, not by trauma. There may be injury to the chest of the victim, such as rib fractures, but these are not going to be the cause of death. Rather, the victim will die because they are unable to expand the thoracic cavity sufficiently to ventilate, i.e., to move air in and out to oxygenate the blood and remove carbon dioxide. I'd suggest deleting Crush syndrome because it's not relevant, but I will leave it to others, because I'm an anon user who edits rarely, and I don't feel I have the status to do that.
Incidentlaly, this entire article is repeated in the body of Crushing (execution). That can't be right.173.49.247.50 (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: oppression

message: I tried to look up one of the references, the one one about Ms.McKenzie article. The link did not lead to the article. Should we edit it?JMChaleat (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  References: Link problem
Talk:Sue Gerhardt

message: This text was added by 165.228.20.59.  Only edit by this IP.  Is it appropriate to this article?
n.b. Interested readers should also refer to the recent works of Arthur Janov (Primal Therapy). His books have been pointing out the physical effects of love (and it's lack) on the developing human brain for several years now. www.primaltherapy.com
::Yes, I believe Janov's work is very much related to this article.  I have put a wikilink to the 'Primal therapy' article in the 'See also' section. SweetP112 03:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:9M311 Tunguska

message: *Photo of Pantsyr
*Photo of Tunguska
--.:Ajvol:. 00:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: I dont think it should be merged the tunguska-m1 is a vehicle in its own right a deserves its own article.
Deng 07-02-06 07.40 CET
:I have migrated most of the content related to the vehicle, to the now expanded Tunguska-M1 article. I would now like to change this article to be purely about the missile. Note that I have not moved the images two Gulf Link images - because I think they are of low quality, and show nothing that the Army magazine image doesn't already show. Does anyone have any comments before I do? Megapixie 14:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, while being "another" weapon system, the split information does not serve any good purpose. The informations should be included in the same article. Now it is just confusing. --MoRsE 04:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with SAWGunner89. The merge banner should be removed Raoulduke47 18:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the banner, and pictures of two 2s6. I suspect whoever nominated it for the merger saw the duplicate pictures and name from the 2s6 article and assumed they were the same. I've replaced them with a self drawn image of a SA-19 which I plan to improve (however I really didn't want to leave the article without any pictures). Anynobody 06:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are pictures availible online, the problem is they are often too small to be of any good here, and low quality too.  Everyone be on the lookout please.SAWGunner89 16:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Amami rabbit

message: What does the -lagus suffix mean in Greek?? (I know penta- means 5, so this must mean 5 of something.) Georgia guy 00:21, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It means "Rabbit", not sure why there would be five of them... Kappa 09:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It could simply be that the author of Pentalagus wasn't feeling very creative and it was the fifth -lagus he named, or the fifth new species for him that year, etc. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as  and  are still active Wikipedians 15 years later, I thought you might find it interesting to know that, while Marcus Ward Lyon Jr. did not explicitly state this was the etymology of the genus, he did repeatedly make the point that Pentalagus was the only known genus of Leporidae (as of 1904) to have only five molars on each side (original paper).--Leptictidium (mt) 15:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, active-ish. I come here from time to time when someone writes on my talk page. :D My comment above my have been off the cuff flippant... I probably had just read some list of humorous scientific names. :) Amami rabbit's genus may not be one of them. Too bad. I liked my humor. :D - UtherSRG (talk) 04:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Pentalagus

message: (Japanese) pampas grass means Miscanthus sinensis and pasania tree means Lithocarpus? I need to know that because I want to translate this article. Also, it can be mentioned the head-body length and the gestation period (per Amami rabbit#cite note-6; page 948). --NGC 54  (talk  | contribs) 12:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "having one or two young each time". But the source says "a single kitten bred at a time". --NGC 54  (talk  | contribs) 12:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plant species 
Talk:Proof game

message: 8. b8=N# doesn't have a unique solution.
1. a4 d6 2. a5 Kd7 3. a6 e6 4. axb7 Nc6 5. Rxa7 Nce7 6. Rxa8 Nf6 7. any Ne8 8. b8=N#
Changing the problem to 7... b1=N# would make it tight.
Or am I missing something?
Arvindn 00:35, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 8. b8=N# is not tight

message: 1. c4 c5 2. Qa4 Qa5 3. Qc6 Qc3 4. Qxc8# —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.146.69.164 (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mirror image" solution isn't unique

message: I suggest renaming this article to "Proof game."  A shortest proof game is a type of proof game, but not the only type.  What do you think? Soberknight (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not familiar enough with the terminology to know.  If that is better, I say "go ahead".  Bubba73 (talk), 15:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to write an explanation into the introduction.  Suffice it to say I know what I'm talking about.  Thanks for the input. Soberknight (talk) 21:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the first paragraph already lays it out.  A "proof game" is a retrograde analysis chess problem for finding a path to a given position in a specified number of moves.  A "shortest proof game" additionally requires that there not be a shorter path.  Sometimes a proof game is designed to take one more move than necessary to require the hypothetical players to "lose a move" by not simply moving a piece back and forth, but finding a more elaborate maneuver. Soberknight (talk) 21:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Time shifting

message: hi, here is another article about the same topic. these two articles should be merged. greets, --Andreas -horn- Hornig 12:12, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeshifting]] 

message: In France there is this tv by satellite company called "Canalsatellite". They provide their users who wish it with a special satellite signal unscrambler called the PILOTIME, that also has a recording function (onto a hard drive). Maybe this could be threwn into the article, though I recommend someone who is actually renting one of these devices do it.
http://www.canalsat.fr/pid326.htm --Beforedecay 20:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In European countries 

message: This article has just been linked to in a slashdot article.. Is it maybe a good idea to semi protect it before it picks up steam?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.197.234.59 (talk) 11:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slashdot incoming 

message: This article does nothing to describe the impact of time shifting beyond the basic "see it later" aspect. Time shifted programs are counted differently when it comes to program viewership ratings. Studios do keep track of the volume and percent of viewership that is "time shifted." But the article doesn't describe the demographic or economic impact related to it. 
Time shifting also allows users to skip commercials, repeat sections, watch things in less time and other things that might seem obvious, but also affect advertising revenues and viability of programs in substantial ways. 
I'm by no means an expert on any of these things, but they are exactly what I hoped to find out about when I read the article. An article on a TV series with 45% of its viewership from time shifting  mentioned its impact in a general sense, but a link to this article was no help in understanding why that 45% was considered irrelevant when counting viewership with respect to that series' survival.
There were also mentions in another article of specific demographic groups being more likely to time shift, thus causing shows with a viewership skewed toward a certain demographic less likely to have them abandon a show when it's moved to a "bad" time slot. But the relevance of a program retaining viewers and losing "live" viewers is not detailed in this article.Hagrinas (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effects of time shifting
Talk:North Stradbroke Island

message: Page has been augmented to reflect the remarkable progress made on native title and land conservation issues during the last 30 years. --Leeshipley 01:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major update 

message: The link to Kath Walker is a redirection and has been changed to her preferred native name, Oodgeroo Noonuccal, which is now the title of her page on Wikipedia. --Leeshipley 01:37, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kath Walker 

message: The 2011 Australian Census recorded a population of just 117.  It is well known that some Aboriginals do not participate in census taking for historical reasons.  117 seems significantly lower that the real figure.  How should we proceed? - Shiftchange (talk) 10:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population