Talk:Comb filter

message: As far as I'm aware, a comb filter has nothing in common with ring modulation. A comb filter is just a particular discrete-time linear filter, whereas ring modulation involves multiplication, i.e. non-linear. Hence ring modulation will create intermodulation distortion.
Oli Filth
:Multiplication in the frequency domain is equivalent to convolution in the time domain. Linear filters can be equivalently represented by multiplication with an appropriate signal in the frequency domain. I believe the comment that it is similar to ring modulation means that if a delayed signal is ring modulated with the original signal in the frequency domain, then the result is similar. From what I can tell from the articles, this seems to be the case.--84.161.176.177 (talk) 16:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Similar to ring modulation"? 

message: This article like many Wikipedia seems to be pretty good technically at least in some ways but there seems to be a lot missing. What this article really needs is a proper TV engineer to write at least a section for it (I could be persuaded to do this but I would have to do a lot of research first and I haven’t touched the subject for about ten years). - But there needs to be a section about comb filters in television systems and other analogue electronics.
: Comb filters are not specific to TVs; they're used all over the place in signal processing applications.  For instance, in interpolation and decimation filters, there is a class of filter known as cascaded integrator comb (CIC), which uses a comb filter.
Anyway, in analogue TV the comb filter isn’t a small peripheral component of the system, its actually pretty much the heart of the whole decoder. (As I remember) It is the comb filter that breaks the signal up into components and it does a kind of magic that allows a very simple circuit to do a very complex task. In fact I seem to remember that it is use of comb filters that made the whole analogue TV system possible. Even monochrome TVs need a comb filter though it is what is called a simple comb - a single resistor.
: A resistor does not perform any filtering on its own.
I also suspect that the description of comb filters based and focused on delays is only partially correct or complete, it is more of a ‘simplified’ 'scientific' rather than an engineers explanation, has a lot of math, and may actually confuse people. Yes comb filters can or do use delays but the essence of the filter is that it is recursive (a repeated element) - another name for them I have heard is ‘recursive filters‘.  Also I don’t think the shape of the waveform is the place the filter got its name from, its circuit diagram actually looks like a comb or matrix made of resistors, but I think the name came from a more abstract level - the filter orders in a certain way, it was originally conceived as like a comb - it just happens that the waveform looks the same because that is what it does.
: No, a comb filter is just one type of filter.  It can be feedforward or feedback (recursive).  It relies on delays to operate (as do all filters).  Almost all digital filters are derived from "repeated elements"; see the image at digital filter, for instance.  The comb filter is so called due to the shape of its frequency response.
The delay based version of the circuit is only one type and there are others - the TV circuit for instance is purely driven by phase. In fact I seem to remember reading somewhere that comb filters are considered a ‘universal’ type (this means that combs can be made to perform almost any function and also that almost any given circuit type can be made to work as a comb). This was probably from an early book on cybernetics, or feedback, computation or AI (my own main subject area).
: Phase-shift and delay are essentially the same thing. Oli Filth 11:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Incidentally, I do agree that the article is severely lacking.  There are no diagrams of implementations in terms of delay lines, no pole-zero diagrams, and the frequency response diagrams are unhelpful, at best.  The derivation of the frequency response is made more complicated than it needs to be by working with e^{j\omega n} rather than z. Oli Filth 11:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was bored, so I've completely re-written the article to include all this stuff. Oli Filth 16:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Very nice work. Thank you very much. --Kvng (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half finished? 

message: What does alpha represent?  "Scale factor" does not mean anything to me. 71.168.90.28 (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A more common and specific word for "Scale factor" is "gain". Probably would make sense to make this substitution in the article. --Kvng (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What is alpha?

message: Engineers (as opposed to mathematicians) are accustom to seeing response plots with logarithmic magnitude scale. I realize it is impossible to plot a null on such a scale but I feel the use of linear plots has to potential trip up the casual reader. I suggest changing example set of alphas for feed forward case to same use for feedback case (0.5, 0.75 and 0.9) and plotting on a logarithmic scale. In addition to showing a more conventional representation, we'll see that the feedback form is a flipped version of the feed-forward form. I'd also like to request inclusion of phase response plots paired with the magnitude plots. --Kvng (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plots

message: Sorry to be a pedant, but anyone know why all the illustations are duplicated?
Also (again sorry to flaunt my ignorance), but any chance someone could explain what this is about in a way suited to the meanest intelligence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.115.106 (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dupes 

message: There seems to be no information in this article, NTSC, or Composite video about the implementation of the comb filter in NTSC television sets; this article only has a brief mention of their existence and purpose. Is it worth creating a separate article on Comb filter (television)? (I am currently too busy to do this myself.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 01:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV comb filter 

message: …as do some related articles like Microphone practice.  This article needs expansion on this aspect of the topic. Theodore Kloba (☎) 16:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Comb filter-effect]] links here...