Talk:Overjustification effect

message: Reminds me of Tom Sawyer getting his friends to pay him for the privilege of painting his fence ! Only the other way round ... --195.137.93.171 05:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why didn't you comment on WP:MEDRS and give an expert review against the WP:GAN criteria?  Your comments in many ways hurt this student in getting their GA passed and made the article more out of line because you were evaluating them against a criteria not related to Wikipedia? :( --LauraHale (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't understand exactly what you mean here.  What does it mean to "give an expert review against the WP:GAN criteria"?  I'd really like to improve this article properly, and I see how moving away from primary sources will be more in line with proper Wikipedia format, so any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.  TroyandAbedintheMorning (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

text:  I don't understand why User:LauraHale cites the medical research policy WP:MEDRS, since the Overjustification_effect does not involve medical research.Robertekraut (talk) 20:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Why didn't you comment on WP:MEDRS and give an expert review against the WP:GAN criteria?  Your comments in many ways hurt this student in getting their GA passed and made the article more out of line because you were evaluating them against a criteria not related to Wikipedia? :( --LauraHale (talk) 09:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course.  As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article.  Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work.  If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further.  If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
* 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
* 1 - A few minutes of work needed
* 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
* 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
* 4 - More than an hour of work needed
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact of recent student edits

message: Is there a source for the claims made about Alex Rodriguez and other athletes in the Sports subsection of the Applications section? I assume there is, especially given the citations scattered throughout the rest of the article, but I just didn't see it anywhere in the article. Abagh0703 (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Sports subsections of Applications section?