lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1 E+27 m²

message: Another editor has proposed deletion of this article. It is the limit of a series of articles giving examples of things having a certain order of magnitude. However, no example is given at Orders of magnitude (area) of anything in this range.  Perhaps a cometary orbit might fit, though.  I suggest keeping it.  - Fayenatic london (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are also articles on smaller magnitudes in this series without examples presently. Since this series is so new, I'm sure we could wait some time before deciding on what should be the "outer limit". __meco 12:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly some long-period cometary orbits fit this order of magnitude, and the next one, and probably the next one too.  I hope somebody with more understanding of astronomy and the data sources will put in some specific examples of notable comets.  - Fayenatic london (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion proposal
Talk:Hypercoagulability in pregnancy

message: A useful reference for anyone expanding this article is here.
Jamiegreen (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Further references can be drawn from:
* 
* 
* 
* 
The latter two are already added to the list of references included in the article. But the role of aspirin in reducing recurrence of complications needs to be emphasised by rewriting portions of the Complications section. I feel that all of the references that I have mentioned, need to be included in the article. DiptanshuTalk 07:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Hello . I think the name of the article should be changed from hypercoagulability in pregnancy to Thrombophilia in pregnancy. The concept of hypercoagulability refers to the tendency of the blood to clot in a test tube in the laboratory. Thrombophilia which is the tendency to develop thromboses.
Here is an academic article which explains the difference between the two concepts https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19797918/
HelenaGZ (talk) 12:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  change article name
Talk:Yungbulakang Palace

message: Why is it called "The Mosher and Song Holy Hall"? Mosher and Song don't sound tibetan114.45.160.175 (talk) 13:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "According to Tibetan traditions, Yumbu Lakhang was erected in 1623 for the first Tibetan king, Nyatri Tsenpo" there is a mistake here: Nyatri Tsenpo vs 1623...--176.206.160.189 (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1623
Talk:New Covenant (politics)

message: Is there no article on Nixon's New Federalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.167.100.82 (talk • contribs) 17:59, 26 June 2007
:New Federalism? —Mrwojo (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New Federalism
Talk:Environmental Quality Management

message: I went through and did a lot of wikification on this article, which was not well-organized or structured in accordance with Wikipedia conventions. It still needs a good deal of rewriting and wikification, but some of the more egregiously promotional aspects of the original entry have been scaled back. I am not going to get involved with this article on a continuing basis; my initial interest in the article was solely due to its editing, which broke a stub template on another article, and my attempts to fix that template. Horologium t-c 18:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial rewrite
Talk:Outline of biochemistry

message: I've noticed that the link for "pigments" redirects to chemical pigments while there is a separate article specifically on biological pigments.  I don't know how to fix this, could somebody help?  Thanks--The Edit0r 18:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Wolf ODonnell 11:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines".
The Transhumanist 01:15, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines" 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Hot House Entertainment

message: The entire history section is taken verbatim from their website (http://press.hothouse.com/company_info.php) and should be rewritten for neutrality. Most of the references point to various sections of their website, and the online properties section reads like a navigation menu. I deleted the most egregious entries but the remaining ones could stand a rewrite as well. Leliro19 (talk) 06:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources press release 

message: These should be explained either generally or possibly also specifically, what does it mean and what's the difference between them if any. Benjiboi 13:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online properties 

message: Hot House search on xbiz and on Gay Porn Times. Benjiboi 23:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: An extensive discussion on COI and adverts in this article can be found at Wikipedia:Coin#Benjiboi_COI_-_how_do_we_move_forward Smallbones (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Blanket and empty vague insinuations are unproductive. Please demonstrate actual COI content before re-adding.  -- Banjeboi 13:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI and adverts by paid editors
Talk:Saran (plastic)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: declined. Rifleman 82 (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The link for reference 1 appears to be a click-through site.  I could not find the correct link.  Can someone repair or remove it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.195.83.157 (talk) 02:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Polyvinylidene chloride]] 

message: This article says that old Saran wrap was PVDC, not mixed polymers.  If it really is a copolymer, then the article should be changed. Otherwise, it sounds like the trade name Saran is now separate from the name Saran Wrap. Gah4 (talk) 06:59, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  old Saran
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-06-25/Technology report

message: Special:Contributions/newbies now shows the username of the new user who made the change. (r23075, bug 10306)
No it doesn't. Go to that link, no usernames. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 18:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the page. The change was made in revision r23075, but won't be live on Wikipedia until it's synchronised live. The note about the current live version is there for a reason. 86.134.91.23 22:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Special:Contributions/newbies
Talk:Manseren Manggoendi

message: It looks like this article is a rough translation from this website. However, I have no idea as to what language it could be. -Barkeep 18:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I will go further and say that if this article hasn't been cleaned up since 2007 then it is of no use to anyone in the English Wikipedia, because it is unclear and makes little sense.TheHappiestCritic (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete
Talk:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation

message: I would've placed a see also section on the article page with a link to the Tilton v. Richardson case where the Court refused to allow taxpayer standing under the Free Exercise Clause, but there is no wiki-article for that case yet.
:--Wowaconia 04:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also Tilton v. Richardson

message: ... has the following quote: "'Taxpayers have standing to challenge an executive-branch program, alleged to promote religion, that is financed by a congressional appropriation, even if the program was created entirely within the executive branch, as by Presidential executive order,' as long as the actions of the Executive Branch officials are financed by general appropriations."
I'm seeing two problems with that.  1) Why is there an apostrophe after "order,"?  2) When I followed the reference link to check the original quote it wasn't there.  That means the quote, the source, or both are incorrect.  Does anyone have an actual source link? --Kitsunegami (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeals court
Talk:Bolinhos de bacalhau

message: The image currently attached to the article is of Brazilian Pastel de Bacalhau, which looks like a different dish from Pastéis, based on the (nonfree) photos which appear in the weblinked pages. Should be more like fried fish balls than pastry wrapped, no?  Geoff (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found and added photo of bolinhos. Geoff Who, me?  17:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Request - ''Pastéis'' rather then ''Pastel''
Talk:Sony Pictures Kids Zone

message: For real though, why would you take away the crazy guy's edits? They were relevant enough it seemed like
2604:6000:7B42:FC00:185D:2F46:980A:371B (talk) 20:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

message: Please apply the changes in this diff:  5.104.90.107 (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done NiciVampireHeart 15:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2019 

message: Very nostalgic logo 75.104.187.249 (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nostalgia 

message: Does this label still exist? I clicked on this link and it takes me to a page telling the reader to go to Target. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 20:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existence
Talk:RAD Data Communications

message: Article keep was sound defeat for antisemites! Hopefully wikipedia will refrain from deleting jewish people and company articles for the future, less then want to answer inconvenient questions from journalists. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 10:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah and you add a lot to wikipedia through pointless threats with poor english. inconvenient questions? what does that even mean? are you really saying that this random article on WIKIPEDIA about a random corporation is something to take pride in? i think there are other ways to express pride in a great culture129.133.142.139 (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shema Jisrael!
Talk:Juniper Green

message: I'm making a start on making this page a little more consistent in terms of headings and content with the other pages for South West Edinburgh suburbs. I'm looking at Balerno, Juniper Green, Currie, Colinton and Baberton to start with. Any comments welcome. Splorp uk (talk) 14:12, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhat surprisingly, "Juniper Green" is now also the world's first organic London gin, distilled and bottled by "London & Scottish International Ltd" (Organic Spirits Ltd), by appointment to H.R.H. The Prince of Wales, see  Martinevans123 (talk) 22:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Inverleith

message: It has always puzzled me as to the reason Inverleith is so-called, when it is well over 2 km from the mouth of the Water of Leith. Although inbhir is usually applied to places at the mouth of a river, more widely it has the meaning of confluence, so not necessarily the mouth. I'm not aware of another body of water joining the Water of Leith at Inverleith and there's nothing visible on the OS map, but is there possibly something small or now subterranean? What's more, why a Gaelic name in the Lothians where placenames would be much more likely to be Brythonic or Anglic? Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so, they are in the minority, but this article also answers my question as to why there are some. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Mouth'' of Leith? 

message: Dcoetzee 04:11, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested image 
Talk:Ba Cụt

message: YellowMonkey  (cricket calendar poll!) 07:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: What is the source for 1923? Hekerui (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: Bloody Hell, why don't you lock the featured articles to prevent vandalism? >_< - 78.72.28.151 (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of this absurd guideline, but there's a discussion at the bottom of WT:TFA on how to deal with it if you're interested. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   17:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: wikipedia sure is running out of shit to put on the front page, unless their standards have just fallen that low. --Genya Avocado (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  one of the best articles?  really?
Talk:Moredun

message: [Copied from Talk:Craigour to comply with merger formatting on 20 March 2021]
I live in Craigour myself and feel that this article would be better served (and its notability issue resolved) by merging with its parent suburb. Craigour is primarily a quiet residential area and there is little more that can be added that isn't already here. OH NO IT'S cmn  HIDE YOUR MUM HIDE YOUR WIFE ( ❝❞ /✍ ) 20:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a few refs to Craigour which at least assert its existence for GNG purposes. There is certainly a physical overlap between the two areas, and I can see some reports use the names interchangeably. I'm not a local and have no strong feelings on whether they should be merged, Gazetter for Scotland has them separate but like here, they're pretty basic entries, and in fact Moredun's image on there is the tower blocks which I would consider to be in Craigour, so that muddies the waters further. I will try to get the attention of some locals for their opinion via WP:SCOTLAND as I don't think many will see this otherwise. Crowsus (talk) 10:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the merge and agree that Craigour would be better positioned as a resident suburb of Moredun which is the case re local knowledge, addresses, maps, etc.  LordHarris 21:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Merchiston

message: I have added a "citation needed" flag to the statement that the South Suburban is "mooted for reopening". In fact, the line never closed; it is heavily used today for goods traffic and empty stock working. As far as reopening for passenger traffic is concerned, this might or might be "mooted", but I am not aware of any serious plans on the table. If I am wrong about this, I hope someone will provide some details plus a citation. Mike Marchmont (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Following my above comment, I am still unable to find any information  about the line currently being "mooted" for re-opening, and since no other editor has come forward with any further information, I have edited the article accordingly.Mike Marchmont (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopening of South Sub
Talk:Maybury

message: I've removed the prod tag. It's not that I'm dead set against deletion but this should really go through Articles for deletion. The prod rationale is no reliable sources found to verify notability but establishing the notability of a neighbourhood can be somewhat tricky. Also, an AfD might be helpful in identifying a reasonable redirect target (in particular a quick look seems to suggest that the Maybury Roadhouse or the casino that it now houses might be worth an article) Pichpich (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod tag
Talk:Ramganga

message: Shouldn't this page be moved to Ramganga West? The article itself talks about that, then refers to "another" Ramganga called Ramganga East. Maybe the two pages should be created, with this article being a redirect. Sverre 18:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page? 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: The lead should be rewritten as "Ramganga River" not "Ramganga West River".  This is the primary Ramganga River.  U.S. NGA GEOnet lists it as "Rāmganga River". --Bejnar (talk) 06:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Just Ramganga
Talk:Moor Grange

message: does anyone know when building the estate started and when it was completed? Chilkoot 18:53, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know how to move the dot a bit to the right on the map? Mtaylor848 (talk)
:Yes but you will have to give me details of where is should go as I cannot locate the area on a streetmap. I can locate West Park but no mention of Moor Grange. If you can point to it on one of the map sites then I can correct the co-ordinates. Keith D (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have done this now, thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Keith D (talk) 18:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Northfield, Edinburgh

message: I was most amused to read the comments in the article regarding Northfield.
One of the most feared gang culture in the East of Scotland, somebodys having a laugh !!
I grew up in northfield Drive and my parents still live there. I visit them regularly and yes, I admit, for whatever reason I feel that the place has went down hill over the years. But talk of gangs etc, what utter shite !!  It has it's group of youths like any other area, nothing more and nothing less.
One thing I will agree with is the statements about Northfield Boys Club.....I know because I used to play for them!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.239.159.6 (talk) 11:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonense
Talk:Pilrig

message: The land here was part of an estate owned as early as 1506 by Monypenny family. There is no evidence of rig field use. A peel tower would be associated with an estate, not a narrow strip of land. 77.99.105.125 (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derivation of name. 
Talk:Parkhead, Edinburgh

message: * Removal of a potentially malicious SPAM-Domain-Link: (RBN 369)
* hxxp://www.sbpcc.co.uk/
* http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3501354
* http://urlquery.net/screenshot.php?id=3501354
* http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.sbpcc.co.uk
* http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.sbpcc.co.uk
--Gary Dee 11:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPAM Link Removal
Talk:Stockbridge, Edinburgh

message: "original urban grain"?
What exactly does that mean?  The article has obviously been written by one of those pompous twats who all-too-frequently inhabit Stockbridge.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.105.139 (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kerr Street, south of the bridge, is a scar in the otherwise original urban grain of the area. 

message: The real Madame Doubtfire or Annabella Coutts had premises at 3 South East Circus Place. This address sits within the boundaries of Edinburgh's New Town, not Stockbridge as stated. This information can be verified by viewing the City of Edinburgh boundary guides on their website here  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlcm72 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madame Doubtfire 

message: I have removed  Annabella Coutts from the list of notable residents, as she does not meet Wikipedia's standard of notability. Her only claim to fame appears to be that the name of her shop (Madame Doubtfire) was borrowed by Anne Fine as the title of her 1987 novel. If any editor disagrees, feel free to revert. However, if you do, please do not wikilink to Ann Fine's novel or to the film on which it was based, as these are in no way connected to Coutts or to Stockbridge. Mike Marchmont (talk) 14:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on Madame Doubtfire
Talk:Sighthill, Edinburgh

message: Some work has been plagiarized and therefore has been removed due to copyright.
See: http://www.edinburghguide.com/sighthill  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.77.228 (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

message: * Removal of a potentially malicious SPAM-Domain-Link: (RBN 369)
* hxxp://www.sbpcc.co.uk/
* http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3501354
* http://urlquery.net/screenshot.php?id=3501354
* http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.sbpcc.co.uk
* http://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.sbpcc.co.uk
--Gary Dee 11:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPAM Link Removal 
Talk:Sciennes

message: Over the last few edits, I have reorganised the sections of this article to more closely match those of articles on other town and districts. In particular, I have added new sections for location, history, origin of street names, notable buildings and notable residents, with appropriate citations. I also deleted several of the entries under "External links" which I didn't feel to be particularly relevant to the subject (feel free to reinstate if you disagree). I moved some of the pictures to locations within the article that I felt to be more appropriate. And, finally, I removed the "needs additional citations for verification" flag (given that we now have a couple of dozen citations).
Still to do: Add an infobox.
Mike Marchmont (talk) 09:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2020 edits
Talk:The Adventures of Phoebe Zeit-Geist

message: See WP:CMOS#TITLES. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Title