Talk:Kitchen cabinet

message: Deleted a promotional edit from pinnaclecabinets
Eileivgyrt (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion of promotional edit 

message: The sentence: "An example of a frameless cabinet company is called Mill's Pride [1] which was sold at Home Depot since the 1980's."  seems promotional.  May I add: "These cabinets suck, and so does Home Depot."?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.247.231.26 (talk) 19:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Promo? 

message: some of the desighns was wonky shapes and sizes nothing matched at all  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.64.246.44 (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag

message: It seems that all neutrality issues have been resolved and there no longer remains any dispute regarding neutrality of this article.  That would be the criterion to remove the notice.  Please comment over the next few months so that the label can be removed - if appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.92.164 (talk) 11:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Neutrality could be resolved quite a bit if there were more references.  Adding a references tag to this article. 66.90.184.51 (talk) 23:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: From where do we derive that these trends in cabinet design are "post-modern?" I don't see a source for the applying of that term (postmodern) to cabinet design. What about these cabinets makes them "postmodern?" Bus stop (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you saying? If you're saying that the label "post-modern" shouldn't be applied to cabinet designs, because it's an artistic term not a cabinet design term, as if there's some kind of period in design history when cabinets had a "post-modern" look, well, I think you probably have a good point. I hadn't thought much about this term. It was there before I worked on the article. If you wish to change it please do so. But if the earlier author was merely using it as a label, saying cabinet looks changed somewhat, corresponding to more serious changes in the world of art -- well, that's another sense of it. What do you think?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Post-modern cabinet design trends?" 

message: The article on Cabinet_making has a suggestion that it should be merged into this article.  I strongly disagree.
The art of cabinet making is much broader and has a diverse history from the topic of kitchen cabinets.  It may or may not be appropriate to move discussion of construction processes from the Kitchen Cabinet article to the Cabinet Making article.  IMO, that is the appropriate focus of the Cabinet Making article.
--174.101.212.40 (talk) 12:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Cabinet making. And Kitchen cabinet. Two different subjects.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a poor proposal. There is an industrial occupation called Cabinet Making, there needs to be a Wikipedia link to this industry. Kitchen cabinetry, if anything, is merely a sub-category of Cabinet Making.Stringybark (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Cabinet Making? 

message: This article only gives measure in imperial measurements and doesn't refer to standardised norms used in the rest of the world.Finnfather (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes if you'd like to add the other measurements, please do.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-centric article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kitchen cabinet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/print/Kitchen-and-Bath-Design-News/Cabinets-Impact-Healthy-Kitchen-Designs/2%244208
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091115104219/http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/print/Kitchen-and-Bath-Design-News/Green-Product-Options--Interest-Gaining-Ground/2%245401 to http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/print/Kitchen-and-Bath-Design-News/Green-Product-Options--Interest-Gaining-Ground/2%245401
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091120132827/http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/print/Kitchen-and-Bath-Design-News/Classic-Simplicity--Value-Mark-Cabinet-Offerings-/2%245365 to http://www.kitchenbathdesign.com/print/Kitchen-and-Bath-Design-News/Classic-Simplicity--Value-Mark-Cabinet-Offerings-/2%245365
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100907192609/http://events.sfgate.com/sunnyvale-ca/events/show/86926046-kitchen-cabinet-construction to http://events.sfgate.com/sunnyvale-ca/events/show/86926046-kitchen-cabinet-construction
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: While I'm pleased that all the dimensions have conversions, this is a bit misleading. European cabinets are typically a nominal 600mm wide (or smaller multiples of 100mm) so converting from US measures is not very meaningful. I don't know what we can really do about this, since obviously the problem is not essentially a conversion rounding error but that the cabinets are in fact different sizes.
It would be interesting to add some history about industry standardization. Since obviously it affects not just the cabinets but built-in (and freestanding) appliances. This must have been quite a large effort and yet I can't find much information about it. I imagine there are now international standards that I could look up, but I was more interested in how those standards got formulated. Trying to find the history of mundane, everyday industrial design is quite hard! 178.164.173.0 (talk) 06:28, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Dimensions, standardisation