lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Daisenryaku

message: I'm fairly sure this game recently came out here, or is coming soon. The US publisher's site has a page on it. Theclaw1 (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dai Senryaku VII Exceed: US release 

message: So how is it pronounced? Day-Sen-errr-Yaykoo? Akadewboy (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do you pronounce it? 

message: Could you be more specific regarding which games in the series feature unit or base construction and resource harvesting? Thanks. SharkD (talk) 06:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games with resources/construction 

message: More recent Dai Senryaku releases have been multiplatform, so the format of a lists of titles by console is outdated. Perhaps this series could follow the same format as the Nobunaga's Amibition page. Gurrundal24 (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current List Format is Messy
Talk:Fragile Allegiance

message: The article is certainly taking form, I'm upping the rating to B-class. A lot of the prose is in place, just give it a run through to remove weasel words and give it a good copy edit to ensure the text flows. The other main issue is the references. I understand that its an older game and is unlikely to have as extensive coverage as later games online, but any additional references to help verify various points throughout would certainly not go amiss. One last thing is the use of flags in the infoboxes. These shouldn't be used. Take a look at some of the high quality VG articles for how release dates in the infobox should be done. Other than that, I'd consider the good article nomination process, that should be able to give you some more specific points for improvement.
One final issue, the images are a bit too large (800px by 600px), and will hold you up with fair use issues later. Ensure they're of a lower resolution (I personally go for a width of 500px), but still of a good quality. Resizing with Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro should be able to deal with that. -- Sabre (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:VG]] Assessment 

message: I found these reviews:
*PC Gamer UK
*Computer Games Magazine
*Computer Gaming World
*PC Gamer US
Hope these help. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 
Talk:Tsewang Rabtan

message: What is non-encyclopedic about the statement, "What is more, his troops went on a rampage through Lhasa and its environs, looting, raping and killing"?  It's certainly pertinent information that the Zunghars went in with the Tibetans expecting them to be benefactors, and the Zunghars planning to be received as benefactors, and then utterly destroyed those expectations in this fashion.  This is how Mullin characterizes  Desideri's first-hand account of the Zunghar occupation of Lhasa. Bertport (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-encyclopedic?
Talk:Tshering Yangdon

message: This person and three others are described as "the Queen Mother" of Bhutan", which is an inconsistency. Either only one of them is "the Queen Mother of Bhutan" and none of the others is, or more than one are queen mothers of Bhutan, in which case each one can only be described as "a Queen Mother of Bhutan".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.99.225.220 (talk) 14:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

message: Queen mother tshering yangdon wangchuck 119.2.125.138 (talk) 14:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Expedition GeForce

message: I removed the statement from the article just now which claims that the coaster was named after the Nvidia GeForce product line. The only source cited is the company's website, but we actually need an article or something that ties the two together. The source needs to verify that the ride was named after the Nvidia GeForce. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nvidia GeForce claim
Talk:Battle of Iron Works Hill

message: * Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: According to the article on sic, it is to be used when a spelling or grammatical error is in a citation and thus not an error of transcription. The citation quoted here uses a historically correct spelling of the word "maneuver." Since no error (it is historically correct) is in the citation, the inclusion of the "sic" is the error. Current usage and spelling is not superior, just different.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of "sic"
Talk:Glenn H. Mullin

message: Is Glenn a Lama? --Anaccuratesource (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know why we have in-article links to what appears to be notes on the contents of the book? There are no references given... and although the contents are interesting if you study Tantra I guess they are summaries of what can be read in the book - they don’t see to be relevant to the article. I’m thinking either they shouldn’t be there or they should at least be linked as references. And their relevance explained. Dakinijones (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason that I could see. He has an official website and can published his materials there. I added it to external links and removed the irrelevant section. Skyerise (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links in Dalai Lamas on Tantra section
Talk:National Intangible Cultural Heritage (South Korea)

message: 36 and 37 are not on Korea's official website. If anyone can find them, please add them. Badagnani 01:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 36 and 37

message: 52, 54, 59, and 63, and 94 are also missing. Badagnani 01:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 52, 54, 59, 63, and 94

message: Just redid the table by merging and converting the tables on the kowiki version of this article. I think this should be better than the previous version, see version history to get a sense of it. It still needs Template:interlanguage links though. toobigtokale (talk) 09:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redid article
Talk:Yuri Andreyevich Smirnov

message: According to the present text of the article Smirnov died in 1984 but gave lectures and continued his researches in 1985 and in 1986. As he was WWII veteran, he could recieve commemorative decoration in 1985 (40th anniversary of the Soviet victory), but database  has no such entry proving he died before the date. I suggest to remove unsourced and strange-looking statements about his activity after 1984.--95.24.95.40 (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic afterlife
Talk:Pix firewall

message: This page is pretty much useless and should be dropped altogether as the Cisco PIX page covers all this info.  Or at least the information that can be substantiated (Plan 9, please?). Brian Ford 22:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree the information in Cisco PIX is more and page of few paragraphs could be merged there -- Foxb 12:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree -- Nfwu Talk Contribs 12:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hunt Valley Towne Centre

message: If you look at the signage out front of the mall, they spell the name of the mall "Hunt Valley Town Centre".  Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use that name instead? (see )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ペコペコ (talk • contribs) 23:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the name shown there is Hunt Valley Towne Centre. I created that page today to redirect here. That's the limit of my Wiki expertise.--GRatHVTC (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  I have no clue how I caught the one 'e' but missed the other.  Thanks!  —Peco! Peco!TALK 08:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Towne Centre? 

message: Wikipedia doesn't traffic in rumors.  This should either be cited (as an actual uptick in crime, or with sourced statements for merchants at the mall who were opposed to the light rail expansion for this reason) or removed. --Jfruh (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light rail crime?
Talk:Skytypers Air Show Team

message: I suppose when we say "The Skytypers Air Show Team are an aerobatic team that perform at airshows around the country" we are referring to the USA???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.74.220 (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point, I've clarified that it is indeed the USA.  Theflyer 08:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which country?

message: Article mentions Skytypers who flew a missing man formation, then Blue Angels crash and Blue Angels who flew missing man formation, then says Skytypers didn't fly the next day.
This is completely confusing - is Skytypers the same as Blue Angels?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.171.157 (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Skytypers = Blue Angels?

message: Before April 30, 2007 for sure:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070430173227/http://www.geicoskytypers.com/
If there's focus on the controversies, then that should be made clear.
-- Immigrant laborer (talk) 17:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did GEICO become their sponsor?
Talk:Syriac-Aramaic identity

message: What about merging this article into the article Western Syriacs, and then moving the article Western Syriacs into the article Syriac-Aramean people. All three articles is threatning the same object, and article Western Syriacs is very uneccessary. VegardNorman (talk) 12:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging article into Western Syriacs
Talk:Fontaine

message: Question for French linguists
----
Is it possible that "Fontaine" was "Fontaineau" previously in the genealogy records, thereby changing what we know about French nobility?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300B:C0C:6000:15EE:5C4A:D9E4:7C11 (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Umar Arteh Ghalib

message: In January 2010, an anonymous editor added a large amount of unsourced and PoV text (link).  I have reverted to the older version. It's a short stub, but at least it cites four references, as opposed to the longer version's single attribution. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2010
Talk:Gun control policy of the Bill Clinton administration

message: On February 28, 1993, the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian ranch at Mount Carmel, a property located nine miles (14 km) east-northeast of Waco, Texas. An exchange of gunfire resulted in the deaths of four agents and six Davidians. A subsequent 51-day siege by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ended on April 19 when the complex was destroyed by fire. Seventy-six people, including 21 children and two pregnant women, along with Davidian leader David Koresh, died in the incident. This has come to be known as the Waco Siege.  This incident began as an attempt by the ATF to enforce gun control laws under the new Clinton Administration.
No source. No description of a gun control policy. No connection to Clinton or appointees until the siege was underway. It's a classic WP:Coatrack. Felsic2 (talk) 08:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waco siege
Talk:Urban målare

message: According to the text, Urban was a painter. - Why is he classified amongst art historians?--RPD (talk) 02:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, must be someone who has confused people in the history of art with art historians. Fixed it. Tomas e (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category?
Talk:Manolo Valdés

message: This page was requested under Culture and Fine Arts.  It is an adapted translation from the Spanish Wikipedia.   is an ArtDaily.org notice about his most recent exhibition that calls him "one of the most distinguished artists of the last half-century from Spain’s artistic scene."  Thomas Lorens wrote a monograph on Valdés/Valdéz .  He and the artistic group he founded are mentioned on the es.wikipedia.org article on Pop Art. If's it's to be deleted, take off also the redirect at Manolo Valdes (without the accent). Pishogue 23:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Being a translation from Spanish Wikipedia gives it quite a bit of credibility. Article needs some more sources (who says that he "introduced to Spain a form of expression that combined political and social obligations with humor and irony"?) but the subject passes the Google test and he also is part of an underrepresented field of study on Wikipedia. I'm removing the good faith speedy, at the very least nomination should go to AFD, but with more sources I think the article can be quite solid. — Edward Z. Yang(Talk) 00:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Admissible evidence

message: Evidence (law) is a much better and more complete article that seems to cover the same ground originally intended for this article.  I would pursue the merger myself, but I do not have the time or energy to follow it up, so I would encourage someone else with more dedication to do so :)
72.205.55.200 16:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose such a merger. It would be better to expand this article then to merge it into a much broader subject. The law of evidence also covers, for example, burdens of production and persuasion, which are a separate issue from admissibility. bd2412 T 02:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone propose a merger of this article into [[Evidence (law)]]?

message: The policy is for future re-working of article (building an encyclopedia), yet may be deemed inadmissable?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.172.231.95 (talk) 04:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikipedia policy on "sharing material on talk page"
Talk:Last Armageddon

message: I tried to remove the following from the article (under a different IP address), but my edit was reverted:
These strict guidelines allowed localization staff in those regions to freely eradicate all references to violence, death, politics, the Holocaust, homosexuality, most religious references, and mature content for more than a decade in video games released for Nintendo systems in North America and Europe. Roman and Greek gods were the only exception to the strict North America guidelines against religion in video games. By following a set of draconian procedures similar to that of the Hays Code and the National Legion of Decency that censored early American cinema, American and European censors generally emasculated 8-bit and most 16-bit games. Japanese games were more like PG-13 and R-rated movies; American and European games were the equivalent to G and PG-rated movies.
It was not until the establishment of the ESRB ratings system in 1997 that finally persuaded Nintendo of America to relax their censorship policy. While Nintendo's North American and European departments still self-censors their games, the censorship is done due to image reasons rather than preventing moral outcry among parents. For example, Japanese Wii games do not work on Wii console systems that were purchased in North America or Europe due to a regional lockout chip. This implanted chip prevents North American and European gamers from playing "uncensored Japanese Wii games" on their system and forces them to purchase games from their local retailer. The implanted chip also has the side effect of discouraging people from importing video games from other countries.
This seems off-topic in terms of the article, which should be about the game itself, not the history of videogame censorship, and also reads somewhat like a rant.  Could a reason please be given as to why this was removed? Thanks.
71.57.172.38 (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Worms: The Director's Cut

message: I think we should merge this article because there simply is not enough information to warrent it's own article. It is just a spinoff to Worms and there is not enough info to let it have it's own article. We can merge it into the series page because it is a better place for it.--EclipseSSD (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is to be merged anywhere, it quite clearly should be to Worms (1995 video game), not here - rst20xx (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I think this is a bit unfair, after all:
* It may actually have been limited edition and 5000 copies represents a complete sell-out
* It was released in 1997, long after most people finished giving a stuff about the Amiga, versus the contemporary PCs (already with MMX and early 3D accelerators) and consoles like the N64
* AGA-chipset Amigas weren't the most common or well-selling machines ever
* A lot of people who might otherwise have been interested (in the category of both owning an A1200 or other AGA machine, and still being bothered enough to use it and buy new games/other software) may well have already owned a copy of the original game, maybe even the PC version with Reinforcements, and so not been entirely fussed about having an upgraded AGA-specific version given that the OCS/ECS one was already surprisingly sophisticated
As it was made more as a personal project and a farewell tribute to a platform that both launched Worms in the first place, and had been Team 17's primary focus for almost a decade, they probably didn't care too much about how well it sold so long as it could be written off as a commercial venture instead of something made mostly for in-house enjoyment that probably ate up a few too many business hours... 193.63.174.254 (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the concentration on its low sales?
Talk:Commanders: Attack of the Genos

message: If anyone wants to fatten this article, check out IGN's preview. JAF1970 13:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IGN preview

message: the games are very similar so they should therefore link to each others.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.59.120 (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  it should have a link to the advance wars series 
Talk:Vixen 357

message: I do not have a Wikipedia account, so unfortunately, my anonymous contributions will not permit me to upload an image for this game. If anyone currently working on the project would do so, here is a URL link to a page where an image of the game, Vixen 357, may be found:
http://www5a.biglobe.ne.jp/~mamomamo/mega/083.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.113.84 (talk) 04:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Found
Talk:Oxyd

message: I have added the italics line to the top of the page, because I came to this page looking for information about "Oxyd" the chemical that appears in Optrix eye drops.
Under ingredients it says:  Sodium Hyaluronate 0.15%, Purified Water, Oxyd (TM) 0.06%.  Oxyd (TM) patented.
A search on google scholar throws up this: http://www.optometry.myzen.co.uk/articles/docs/C-5848%20%20Article.pdf
Which says (page 3, table, under Oxyal: 
   ... Oxyd, which turns into oxygen, sodium chloride and water when in contact with the eye
This has a citation mark for that statement but the link to the citations is broken.
Anyway, I think this deserves a stub page and disambiguation etc.  Hopefully someone more in the know might then add to this.  If someone who know how to do this could do so that would be great.
Thanks 81.98.248.70 (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trade Marked and patented chemical name 

message: I delete "Swiss made", because the programmer and his company are from Germany; I don't even find a swiss publisher. --CHF (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country of Production
Talk:Fenton's reagent

message: The last sentence of this article:
"The mismanagement of iron in cellular systems can lead to the toxic accumulation of iron in organ systems such as the liver and brain. It is believed that this build up of iron eventually leads to the production of free radicals leading to oxidative stress, cellular damage and eventual cellular death via apoptotic signaling."
is important as it is a possible mechanism for cell death in Parkinson's Disease...  --74.179.96.130 (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fenton's rxn and PD

message: There is a fenton's reaction in medicine and this article mentions nothing on that. It'd be better if that's included too, should I add it as a subsection in this article or should I make a new article on that?
Dileepunnikri (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fentons reaction in medicine

message: Barbusinski, K. (2009). Fenton Reaction - Controversy Concerning The Chemistry. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, 16(3).
This can be used since that researcher showed one of the most suggested non-OH* oxidizing pathway chemical, ferryl ion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.150.44 (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for non-OH* oxidizing mechanism
Talk:Meteor Mission II

message: For the record, I did discuss restoring this article with the closing admin before restoring: BOZ (talk) 23:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored
Talk:V. G. Jog

message: An interesting, informative article.  The section title 'Grooming', jars somewhat, though, given its association with paedophilia (certainly in current British English).  Bhasi23 (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tuzi

message: should be added into this article. -- Bojan  07:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of places in the municipality 
Talk:Kakusandha

message: yakkha as a nepali tribal looks suspicious to me. Surely it should be Yaksha ? (20040302 (talk))
4000 years?? or 40 years??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.97.237.87 (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Kakusandha Buddha is a figure from Buddhist legend/mythology. Whether he ever really lived at all is open to question. That he could have lived for more than 4000 years is virtually impossible. DiverDave (talk) 04:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adi-Buddha

message: The disambiguation page at Mahadeva lists this article as one of the meanings of the term "Mahadeva". Is this correct: is Adi-Buddha ever referred to using that term? – Uanfala (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahadeva?
Talk:Sam Langhorne Clemens

message: * I have removed this " Samuel Longhorn Clemens " inaccurate  wikilink  from  Mark_Twain_Intermediate_School_239.
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 23:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ Samuel Langhorne Clemens ]]
Talk:Lou DiMuro

message: If someone is up for doing the documentation, it would be appropriate to mention the collision with scoring baserunner Cliff Johnson that left DiMuro unconscious, then hospitalized and then incapacitated for I think six weeks. Did his "ailing hip" stem from that? Were there lasting mental affects that may have made him more vulnerable to later being hit by an automobile? Even if that's not documentable, the collision belongs here. Dvd Avins (talk) 23:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Virtual Pool

message: This needs to be a real article, an overview of the entire franchise, not a WP:DAB page. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 23:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real article instead of DAB 

message: VP 4 was released August 15, 2012. Probably needs an article. At very least the "Sequel" section in this article needs an update.  I may get around to it, but I'm trying to minimize the time I spend here on pop-culture topics.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  08:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually both. Generally we will summarize a sequel in the video game article and have the predominant content in the series article, where the series article exists. (Where it doesn't the content just lives in the "prequel" article until spun out.) --Izno (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Virtual Pool 4'' 

message: I'm looking to get this article up to WP:GA Status soon. I was wondering if anyone had any pressing issues with the article that would need addressing before being nominated? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Nomination