Talk:Impassibility

message: Could someone with more experience address a differentiation between God's (in)ability to feel pain and pleasure, and God's ability to feel more complex emotions? It seems to me that most forms of Christianity will talk about God being pleased or displeased, and they certainly attribute to God the ability to love. Inhumandecency 23:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "emotions" vs. "pain and pleasure" 

message: What tradition(s) is this accepted in?  I don't know that I've ever heard of it before, and theology is one of my favorite topics.  Plus the article is not clear on how God's emotion is like his hand, but that's probably because of the complexity of the issue as discussed above. --Jesdisciple (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who?

message: What about "impassibilité" as a form of writing/art production starting prominently in 20. century? This is kind of a phd. Issue, i wanted to throw it in at least. 
Addendum: In fact, it plays a major role in Flaubert's concept of the novelist's attitude toward his subject matter. --Gr5959 (talk) 20:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impassibilité in Literature/Arts 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Impassibility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605190801/http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/articles/impassib.htm to http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/articles/impassib.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929124639/http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ReligionTheology/HistoryofChristianity/EarlyChurch/?view=usa&view=usa&ci=9780199297115 to http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ReligionTheology/HistoryofChristianity/EarlyChurch/?view=usa&view=usa&ci=9780199297115
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The current entry on divine impassibility in the Roman Catholic Church incorrectly asserts that it is among the Church's dogmas.  *Immutability* is a dogma, but impassibility actually is not.  There are many who think impassibility is derivable from things like immutability and aseity, but there are many others who say it is not; no *UN*controversial derivation has been given yet, and most importantly the Church herself has NOT pronounced this to be dogma.  I advocate changing the entry only to remove the claim that the Church teaches it dogmatically, because the original author certainly is right that impassibility is a very popular doctrine among Catholics, especially for Thomists and many other scholastics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.42.50.248 (talk) 20:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impassibility in the Catholic Church 

message: I Strongly urge that this page be put on hold until someone can grab from the denominations' official writings statements that support the article, or refute it. Misty MH (talk) 07:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial or bizarre without citations?