Talk:Gawler line

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. --Stemonitis 00:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#
====Survey - Oppose votes====
# Oppose I believe the article should refer to the town/suburb the line goes to rather than the name of the last station. (I therefore would support moving Noarlunga Centre Line to Noarlunga Line.GK1 08:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem with that is there is no suburb called Tonsley, thus the Tonsley line would have to break that convention.--AtD 09:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Problem also in that there is no single suburb called Noarlunga.--cj | talk 20:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments:
Given that either form could be correct, I suggest that we err on the side of common usage and adopt simply "Noarlunga" and "Gawler".--cj | talk 20:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#
====Survey - Oppose votes====
# Oppose I believe the article should refer to the town/suburb the line goes to rather than the name of the last station. (I therefore would support moving Noarlunga Centre Line to Noarlunga Line.GK1 08:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem with that is there is no suburb called Tonsley, thus the Tonsley line would have to break that convention.--AtD 09:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem also in that there is no single suburb called Noarlunga.--cj | talk 20:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Oppose I believe the article should refer to the town/suburb the line goes to rather than the name of the last station. (I therefore would support moving Noarlunga Centre Line to Noarlunga Line.GK1 08:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem with that is there is no suburb called Tonsley, thus the Tonsley line would have to break that convention.--AtD 09:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem also in that there is no single suburb called Noarlunga.--cj | talk 20:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes

message: :Add any additional comments:
Given that either form could be correct, I suggest that we err on the side of common usage and adopt simply "Noarlunga" and "Gawler".--cj | talk 20:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I believe that this article should be renamed Gawler Central Line. TransAdelaide offers services during peak times which do not stop at Gawler Central the final stop but terminate at Gawler and return to Adelaide. To avoid confusion between the 2 services the line should be renamed Gawler Central.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Standspace (talk • contribs) 05:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gawler Central/Gawler Line issue 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - I'm happy with this so long as naming conventions are supported. While we're at it, can we get rid of the "X Interchange, Adelaide" and use the proper railway station convention. TheInterchanges primarily are railway stations (and were originally built as such), so they should reflect that - no other Australian city calls their interchanges with different conventions. JRG (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gawler Central railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140210204945/http://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/var/metro/storage/original/application/8a768a6fdea5fb9418c2b174b850e308.pdf to http://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/var/metro/storage/original/application/8a768a6fdea5fb9418c2b174b850e308.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413132821/https://dtei.clients.squiz.net/RCDR/rail_car_depot_relocation to https://dtei.clients.squiz.net/RCDR/rail_car_depot_relocation
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have been working on the Gawler railway line, and more recently, the Outer Harbor railway line too. I liked the line guide that I saw on the latter site, in that it presents a sortable table of details about each station on the line. I have worked to replicate that on this page too (and to synchronise the formatting on both), but due to coding fatigue, I have not been able to finish it yet (since adding an image, or wiki-coding a bus route's colour is quite time consuming). Any help adding to it or tidying it would be appreciated.Thanks! JabberJawJAPAN talk 04:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok - have added all available images and sourced a few new ones for stations without images (eg, Kudla, Elizabeth South).  That leaves 6 stations sans images...JabberJawJAPAN talk 02:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: OK - am doing the buses now too. JabberJawJAPAN talk 03:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Line guide

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gawler railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150130023541/http://www.colemanrail.com.au/index.php/component/k2/item/36-gawler-line-reconstruction to http://www.colemanrail.com.au/index.php/component/k2/item/36-gawler-line-reconstruction
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  —usernamekiran (talk) 15:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: With a caveat I just realised: Should the Seaford line be disambiguated because of the existence of Seaford branch line in the UK? Or do you think hatnotes are sufficient? Fork99 (talk) 21:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Support as per Wikipedia:COMMONNAME Melbourne and Sydney have already fully been moved as well NotOrrio (talk) 23:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a small correction for Sydney, for example: Bankstown Line and Bankstown railway line are two separate articles, one on the service and one for the railway line. Perth has already been fully moved a while ago is what you're after :) Fork99 (talk) 07:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 August 2023