Talk:List of female Nobel laureates

message: This section represents partly own research by the editor. While the presentation of opinions on disputed issues is a legitimate encyclopedic topic, it has to be backed by sources. The presentation of statistics does not belong to this section, except if it is a citation from such a source. Moreover, if an opinion is only marginal, for example, appears only in very few editorials or other published texts, it does not belong here. Andreas 02:02, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own research 

message: I'm perplexed as to why this was added. Franklin was not a laureate. Perhaps it could be part of a new "Women who should have won the Nobel Prize" article. Also, I removed the dead link the graf referenced. IronDuke 00:50, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted Franklin 

message: According to Wikipolicy (see WP:OR), verifiable sources are required. Where are they to substantiate the information in this article and, in particular, the table? Truthanado (talk) 21:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The similar Black Nobel Prize laureates has been similarly tagged. Truthanado (talk) 21:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that the comparison table has been removed and this has been appropriately labeled as a list, it seems that it is no longer original research. Truthanado (talk) 00:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?

message: Is this list really encyclopedic? I wonder how long would List of male Nobel laureates survive... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  00:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_atheist_Nobel_laureates_(2nd_nomination). Голубое сало/Blue Salo (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Nobel website has a list specifically for this, and it's an item of interest (notably since no woman has ever won the Prize in Economics). A male Nobel laureates list is unnecessary because 1) there's like 30 women as versus 750 men 2) it's a WP:NOT#INFO/WP:WEIGHT problem 3) it's not an item of interest for obvious reasons. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 00:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

text: As an addendum, I would endorse the results of that AfD, as none of those lists have an official list from the Nobel website, and I doubt any of them are an item of interest or pass WP:NOT#INFO. For instance, if List of black Nobel laureates was brought to AfD, I would support the deletion of the list. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 00:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, that's lovely :) Where's the List of white Nobel laureates? :D --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  00:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that would be a useless list ;-) — sephiroth bcr (converse) 00:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

text: There is an easy solution: make list of Nobel laureates a sortable table, and add categories for gender, ethnicity, nationality, and whatsnot.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  00:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't support that. Past the award and the country (I'm definitely not certain on the structure of the list, but ethnicity and gender certainly would not be one of them), I wouldn't include any of those items per WP:NOT#INFO. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 00:59, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, until we get semantic wiki, I see no other solution if we want to stop more "list of [insert a random adjective] Nobel laureates" from cropping up.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  01:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Delete/redirect the improper articles. We have WP:NOT#INFO/WP:WEIGHT to support us in this regard. I'm not going to include information that violates these aforementioned policies. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 01:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AfD this one then? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  01:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: List of black Nobel laureates? Certainly. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 01:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And this one (females)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  02:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not. As I illustrated above, this is appropriate given that it is verified by the list given at the official Nobel Foundation website, and is a notable item of study. None of these other lists (black, atheist, Asian, or whatever laureates) have this sort of recognition, and thus falls into the WP:V/WP:NOT#INFO/WP:WEIGHT problem. We mirror what our sources provide, and in this case, that is true. And on the practical matter of the AfD passing, I sincerely doubt you will have a chance of it passing given that this is going for FL status right now. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of male Nobel laureates]]

message: Some of these winners shared the award with other people, and in some cases the rationale still reflects this, for example, the first entry for Marie Curie says "in recognition of the extraordinary services they have rendered by their joint researches". There are three solutions to this (and this could also apply to the various affiliate lists too):
#List co-winners (might be a good idea)
#Simply change all lists of "for their" to "for [her]"
#Ignore it
I think #1 might be a good idea. There are several ways you could do this: 
1903			France	Physics	"in recognition of the extraordinary services they have rendered by their joint researches on the radiation phenomena discovered by Professor Henri Becquerel"
OR
1903			France	Physics	"in recognition of the extraordinary services [she has] rendered by [her] joint researches on the radiation phenomena discovered by Professor Henri Becquerel". Shared prize with Pierre Curie.
Or maybe something else. -- Scorpion0422 17:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Did the first one. I'll get around to updating the affiliate lists sometime this afternoon. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 19:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Just noticed something

message: I have now added a link to this list (under "See also") in each of the articles on the individual female laureates. Previously the list does not appear to have been cited in any of the articles. I suggest that such a link is added in connection with all future female Nobel laureates. Davshul (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to this list on article of the individual laureates 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Burma 3 150.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: The laureates of Aung San Suu Kyi, Leymah Gbowee and Tawakel Karman all have photos in their respective articles, but not on this list. If someone could improve this list by adding properly sized versions of their photos, that would be great IMO. Finding a photo of Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin would be swell as well. I would do this myself if I had the competence, but alas I have do not currently have that. G913 (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of female Nobel laureates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081015013145/http://nobelprize.org/prize_awarders/ to http://nobelprize.org/prize_awarders/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: How very un-encyclopedic. Mrloop (talk) 11:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not have a list of straight Nobel laureates and one of gay Nobel laureates as well? And maybe a list of left-handed Nobel laureates? One of black Nobel laureates? One of white Nobel laureates? One of latino Nobel laureates? Mrloop (talk) 11:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? – A list of Nobel laureates based on gender? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion