lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jikininki

message: A) The kanji given for jikininki make no sense for the reading.
B) Those kanji don't appear in Japanese Wikipedia.
C) The kanji do appear in Chinese Wikipedia, but as the translation of the word "ghoul."
D) I think this article has serious factual errors.
--66.8.203.13 01:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please fix it then. — BrianSmithson 07:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed the problem with the kanji and the short translation of the term. I also fixed the kanji on the Spanish and Norsk pages where the problem had spread to. It looks like this has spread to other parts of the web copied from this article. They are the only hits for the old incorrect kanji on the web. I'm not prepared to address other problems with this page though. (Note that the link to the Japanese article is actually a link to a novel with the name 食人鬼 "jikinninki", there is no Japanese article on this subject, just a disambiguation page.) Tweisbach (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

message: I think this article should either be deleted or completely overhauled to reflect its fictional nature.
There are no sources cited within the text except for a Lafcadio Hearn story, which the corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article indicates is a work of fiction inspired by an Ueda Akinari story. The Japanese disambiguation page at ja:食人鬼 indicates that the word is a generic term for ghosts that eat people, or cannibals, or a translation of ghoul. A quick Googling of the term also brings up only the Lafcadio Hearn story, the Japanese Wikipedia article about the Lafcadio Hearn story (which it calls a 小説), and modern works of fiction inspired by the Hearn story.
It would seem to me that Lafcadio Hearn basically mistook a generic word that in modern Japanese isn't even pronounced jikininki, for a Buddhist term, and the proper word is gaki.
Therefore, while a Wikipedia article based on his story (like the Japanese article linked to here) would be appropriate, the current article is unacceptable.
I could translate the Japanese article and put it on here instead, if no one disagrees?
elvenscout742 (talk) 07:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A proposal
Talk:New York Tendaberry

message: Acclaimedmusic.net has Eli and the Thirteenth Confession at 749 all time, New York Tendaberry at 1402. The statement that New York Tendaberry is considered best needs substantiation, or should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.10.53.154 (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Generally considered best by critics'?
Talk:Newcastle Sunday

message: The "Newcastle Sunday (video)" article should now be deleted as the information from this article is now contained in the original "Newcastle Sunday" article.  The live DVD presents the same content as the CD and as such does not merit an article of its own.  {Themanmaydie (talk) 01:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to delete; we'll keep it as a redirect. --BDD (talk) 03:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Night Attack (album)/version1

message: The same album is at Night Attack (album).  Most of the info is on both.  These pages should be merged. Sampm 09:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this idea, I have just added the content from the international version to the base Australian version article, then I added new content and supported some of the added material with references: more needs to be done.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate info
Talk:Night Attack (album)

message: The same album is at Night Attack (album).  Most of the info is on both.  These pages should be merged. Sampm 09:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this idea, I have just added the content from the international version to the base Australian version article, then I added new content and supported some of the added material with references: more needs to be done.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate info 
Talk:Night Passage (album)

message: It doesn't need 10 000 people and a concert hall for a live performance, playing "before a crowd of 250 people" in a record studio is also live!
- so I rechanged the type from studio to live.  Thomas279 (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: live or not live
Talk:Night Ride Home

message: Mentioning that night ride home in in alternate tuning is completely unnecessary, seeing that all Joni Mitchell songs exept for a handful are in some kind of alternate tuning for the guitar
Roberto 17:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Night Songs (Cinderella album)

message: wrong link ? Anne Bauval (talk) 21:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT? --Muhandes (talk) 21:22, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jeff Paris]] 
Talk:Night Train (Oscar Peterson album)

message: I was disappointed to see that, rather than having a separate description of one of Oscar Peterson's most famous songs, the link simply goes back to this article, rather than providing any further information on the song.  Was that done intentionally? I'm not in a position to write an article on the song, but I've been stymied in my effort for get information about it. A Wikipedia search for Home to Freedom is also redirected to this article.  It feels like an endless loop. Does anyone have any ideas about why that's happening? Mpwrmnt (talk) 04:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hymn to Freedom
Talk:Nightcap: The Unreleased Masters 1973–1991

message: I possess this album as a double cassette set (HMV, India.) I noticed that the covers of the two cassettes are of two different shades (one with black background colour as is mostly available when searched on the Internet and the other greenish.) This could be a printing mistake or just a faded cover. I'd like to know if others having the same set have had a similar experience?
The second bit is about names of each of the cassettes. The first one is labeled as "My Round -The Château D'Isaster Tapes" and the second as "Your Round - Unreleased and Rare Tracks". Before I update the main article, I'd like to confirm this information.
--Supreo75 (talk) 08:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nilsson Schmilsson

message: Don't know if this is worthy of inclusion, but the quad mix of this album was significantly different from the stereo release for some of the songs - Down and Jump into the Fire coming to mind. Should this be included? Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quad release 

message: I just added my dad (Tony Terran - trumpet) to the personnel section of this article. My primary source is my dad's AFM & SAG-AFTRA Intellectual Property Rights Distribution Fund Royalty Statement dated 4-29-22. Daveterran (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Source is not published. I reverted your addition. Binksternet (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean the source of my dad playing trumpet on this album is not published? Why would my dad get a royalty payment for playing on this album if he did not play on this album? I'm not going to make my dad's royalty statement public on Wikipedia. Daveterran (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody is asking you to publish your father's royalty statement. However, your problem remains that your father is not listed by authors as having participated in some of the projects that you think he participated in. If no author has listed him, he cannot be added. Your next step should be to find a writer or journalist who is willing to sort through your evidence and write a piece about your father, listing his accomplishments. Binksternet (talk) 07:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Tony Terran

message: The numbers after the personnel don't make sense given the numbering on the track listing. Is it a simple matter of re-numbering the tracks on side 2 as 6-10? Will that make the personnel align correctly with the tracks they performed on? (I suspect so, but I'm not familiar with this album, and I don't have a copy of it.) Or should the personnel be listed by a different system (A-1, B-2, etc.)? Thanks all - Dcs002 (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel/track listings
Talk:Nines & Sixes

message: I think they used some songs from this album on one of the CSI shows awhile back.  Anyone know the episode or anything?--Twintone 21:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSI 
Talk:No Comment (Front 242 album)

message: Is "S. FR. Nomenklatura" an abbreviation for "Sample from Nomenklatura?"  Was this sample taken from the East German Volkskammer?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.239.45.4 (talk) 21:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of Song Name
Talk:No Daylights... Nor Heel Taps

message: The track listing for this album contains no track lengths. This should be fixed by somebody who can either a) find them online b) find them in online stores (iTunes, Amazon, etc.) c) owns the album—either in physical or digital form. — Tha†emoover†here (talk) 04:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track lengths?
Talk:No Other

message: Not sure how to fix it, but thought someone should. Cheers!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.16.131.171 (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting issue in heading 

message: Unproven rumors like this one about a near-fight between Clark and Geffen have no business here. I considered deleting it altogether, but decided there was enough documentation to make the claim worth keeping. Instead I inserted a sentence about Geffen's denial that it ever happened.Dgndenver (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unproven rumor
Talk:No Talking, Just Head

message: The article states the album title is a fellatio joke, but it doesn't seem that way to me. It's an album by every Talking Heads member besides the vocalist, so it's a pretty obvious title. Agreeent? Pesapluvo 17:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say both- It's "Hey this CD is Talking Heads but not really," but it can definitely be understood as a fellatio reference. Cantras 17:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: nevertheless, WP is not a collection of our opinions. it would be nice to find a quotable source for this -- all i could find were parrotings of the statement here, which is somehow unsatisfactory.  Doceddi (talk) 18:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

text: i've given this a few days' rest, and i still don't feel it's fitting. i mean, i like a pre-pubescent sex joke as much as the next guy, but it just feels like a total non sequitur here -- what has it got to do with the music? with the band? I'm making a commitment to check back in a couple of days, and if no good ref is forthcoming, i'm going to strike the statement. hope i don't forget. Doceddi (talk) 11:39, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fellatio joke 

message: What year was this released?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmoustache14 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: it was already in the infobox, but i added it to the opener. Doceddi (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Year?
Talk:Noise Floor (Rarities: 1998–2005)

message: Perhaps just a small mention of the flyer that comes with the vinyl of this release, it includes a code to allow the full album to be downloaded in MP3 from the Saddle Creek web site, the first B.E. album to be available like this?.  Great for vinyl loving mp3 player owners, and also something that vinyl releasing record labels seem to be getting into.  I believe Touch & Go now do this.
--born against 15:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vinyl & MP3 Download
Talk:Norfolk Coast (album)

message: Sounds more like a review from the Strangler's publisher.  Definately not Wikipedia worthy.  --Rev. Austin 23:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 
Talk:Nothing Lasts... But Nothing Is Lost

message: The link to shpongle's page at the bottom is giving a 404 now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.204.26.99 (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Link
Talk:Queen's University of Ireland

message: Catholics were permitted in Trinity from 1793. Thomas Moore was one of them. If this remains in the article (I am not permitted to edit the said article) then this article will continue to be guilty of slander against this fine institution, which has educated generations of Catholics. You may be confused because the Irish bishops prohibited membership of the college at different times, but the college itself was essentially secular from the 19th century on. For shame. 86.40.210.11 (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the idiotic passage will remain then? I cannot edit to fix it because some zealous editor will come along and will want me to provide a reference for it (Its the equivilent to providing a reference establishing Bush as a Christian!)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.202.253 (talk) 23:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have edited it and fixed the problem. My time in wikipedia has been so stressful that I fully expect some troll to come along and revert it, and then accuse me of trolling, vandalism, and all the rest. 86.40.99.232 (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catholics in Trinity 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Queen's University which affects this page. I am proposing the following moves:
* :Queen's University → 
* :Queen's University (disambiguation) → 
Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. --kingboyk (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Now What (Lisa Marie Presley album)

message: :I Guess I'm confused how the label New Wave got there in the first place which was not referenced to begin with. Presley music has never bee defined as New Wave which is antiquated term at best for her music. PS no reference stating it is New Wave. Will remove if no reference is found.66.108.86.141 (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok the original genre was Rock not New Wave which was added later with no reference so what should I do remove New Wave and leave it just Rock not POP? 66.108.86.141 (talk) 03:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This User " 03:24, 19 October 2011‎ 203.82.95.83 " added NewWave with out a reference which is why I removed it.66.108.86.141 (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok this link which is already referenced in the info box http://www.allmusic.com/album/now-what-edited-r732258/review List the album as pop/rock not New Wave!66.108.86.141 (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Category
Talk:Nu-Clear Sounds

message: This is objectively not a garage rock record. Just because some reviewer used the term in connection with it I don't think it should dictate the genre listing for the page. 2603:301F:1B5D:2940:820:BDB:CD90:BC45 (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garage Rock?
Talk:List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 1963

message: How exactly does West Side Story accumulate 54 weeks at #1? From what I can see on the pages so far, it adds up to 53. --WolfSpear (talk) 05:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope this clarifies the total:  West Side Story spent 53 nonconsecutive weeks at #1 on the stereo chart, and 12 weeks at #1 on the mono chart.  During one of those weeks, it was only #1 on the mono chart. --Petepait (talk) 04:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Side Story 

message: ===Top 5 Mono Albums for the Week of March 9, 1963===
#Allan Sherman - My Son, the Celebrity
#Frank Fontaine - Songs I Sing on the Jackie Gleason Show
#Vaughn Meader - The First Family
#Allan Sherman - My Son, the Folk Singer
#Peter, Paul & Mary - Moving
===Top 5 Stereo Albums for the Week of March 9, 1963===
#Stan Getz/Charlie Byrd - Jazz Samba
#Soundtrack - West Side Story
#Joe Harnell and His Piano Orchestra - Fly Me To The Moon and the Bossa Nova Pops
#Peter, Paul & Mary - Moving
#Andy Williams - Moon River and Other Great Movie Themes
--Petepait (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 9, 1963 

message: #Stan Getz/Charlie Byrd - Jazz Samba
#Soundtrack - West Side Story
#Joe Harnell and His Piano Orchestra - Fly Me To The Moon and the Bossa Nova Pops
#Peter, Paul & Mary - Moving
#Andy Williams - Moon River and Other Great Movie Themes
--Petepait (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Top 5 Stereo Albums for the Week of March 9, 1963
Talk:List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 1989

message: The No.1 was indeed Phil Collins' ...But Seriously and not Milli Vanilli's Girl You Know It's True. Let me tell what the reason is for that confusion:
There was a time when Billboard didn't release an edition at the end of each year. For example there was no chart published on Dec. 30 1989 so some people transformed the chart from Dec. 23 1989 (when Girl You Know It's True was No.1) to the Dec. 30 1989. But here is the printed paper from Jan. 27 1990:
https://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-Billboard/90s/1990/BB-1990-01-27.pdf
Look at page 92. There it is written that ...But Seriously was 4 weeks at No.1!
1st week: Dec. 30 1989,
2nd week: Jan. 06 1990,
3rd week: Jan. 20 1990,
4th week: Jan. 27 1990.
So Billboard counts the non-released chart on Dec. 30 1989 as a chart in which ...But Seriously was No.1. Therefore it is right to name ...But Seriously at No.1 on Dec. 30 1989.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schorsch.landmann (talk • contribs) 21:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of the issue date Dec. 30 1989
Talk:List of Billboard 200 number-one albums of 2004

message: The data are compiled by Nielsen Soundscan based on each album's weekly physical and digital sales. 
:I thought digital sales were not tabulated for chart compilation until 2005. Anyway, at some point, and only a matter of years ago, there wasn't a digital sales market, so this statement should not be included on these lists of albums by year prior to that time. --Wolfer68 (talk) 20:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When I became aware that digital sales were incorporated beginning 2005, I remove those "and digital". I think I missed this one. --Efe (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital sales
Talk:Number Ones (Michael Jackson album)

message: Does anyone know references showing sales beyond 9 million? The current claim seems outdated based on certifications. I tried, English and non-English sources with no results. Ping  and he might help. Regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 02:43, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for being late. I couldn't find anything in Brazilian Portuguese or Spanishh, only Ukmix, Chartmasters, fan sites and so on... :( --88marcus (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  No worries. Thank you very much for trying. I'll do a further research when I'm available. Regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade
Talk:Numbskull (song)

message: "Numbskull" was released as a single, not an EP. Someone needs to change the name from Numbskull (EP) to "Numbskull" (Ash song). Dean12065 (talk) 12:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked, and all sources say it's a limited edition EP. Just changing the words doesn't make it otherwise. Please find reliable sources to back your claim or I shall change back, with references. --Richhoncho (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single
Talk:Oddities, Abnormalities and Curiosities

message: This article needs some specific minor expansion; viz., production crew (if memory serves me correctly, Niko Bolas was Producer for this album) and instruments assignments.  The critical basics are otherwise stated nicely. - B.C.Schmerker 06:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 
Talk:Optical pumping

message: Hi, I've made some changes to this stub, as I think it is more general to say that optical pumping is not necessarilly preparing the atom to the highest "Zeeman splitting" level. Assuming no B field then there is no "highest energy" Zeeman level as they are degenerate within the same hyperfine level...
If it was originally intended to mean "highest mF value" then this is true only for the case of RH circular polarised light and not true in general for linear polarised light.
I would like to add some references here but I'm not sure how as I'm new to editing wikiedia - I'll see if I can work it out soon :) DanielSlaughter 04:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some links, and also removed "polarized" from the introduction. Many laser gain media, for example, can be pumped with unpolarized light. They can even be optically pumped with incoherent light. Whether you need polarization depends on what state you are trying to prepare. If you're looking for info on how to add citations and references to an article, check out WP:CITE, WP:CITET, and WP:Footnotes.--Srleffler 04:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ok thanks I was unaware that there are applications for optical pumping with incoherent and unpolarised light. DanielSlaughter 04:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many types of solid-state lasers can be pumped with arc lamps or flashlamps, for example. This was pretty common until not long ago, but diode laser pumping is rapidly taking over.--Srleffler 04:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it is needed to give the jargon 'decay' a link in this article. The jargon appears in articles frequently but I never see a link for that jargon. I suggest we should keep it in red until someone really knows how to link it and makes it blue. - Justin545 (talk) 03:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Explain jargon - Justin545 (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Maybe so, but the way to do that is to figure out the correct title for an eventual article on the subject and link to that. (Don't know where to link) is not a properly-formed link.--Srleffler (talk) 04:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: lol, that looks funny :p Well, I just wanted to make people notice there are still a jargon in the article. People may never be aware of the jargon if I didn't made it red. Making the jargon in red would encourage the reader to correct it to a proper link. So do you have better idea helpful to explain the jargon or encourage peple to fix it without violating the policy of wiki? Or can you do me a favor to give it a proper link? Thanks! - Justin545 (talk) 05:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you found the right solution for this article: linking "excitation and decay" to Excited state solves the problem.--Srleffler (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for 'decay'?
Talk:Offbeat: A Red Hot Soundtrip

message: Before the first track there is a data track, which includes a Windows program and some Quicktime videos.  What did this program do? 24.55.241.136 (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the program on this Enhanced CD?
Talk:OK (Talvin Singh album)

message: If Ajay Naidu is on tracks 5 and 11 of this album, why isn't he mentioned in the current version of this article? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 03:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ajay Naidu]]
Talk:On Down the Line

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus, move album to primary topic, and hatnote the song. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 07:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Albums has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Country Music has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 September 2022