Talk:Star Wars: The Clone Wars (video game)

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This article needs a section about the reaction people had with this game.
Also, the synopsis leaves some important stuff out, like the guardian things Anakin kills on Rhen Var. That is more important than the Dark Acolytes.KdogDS 20:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reaction

message: Should this article be written in the present or past tense? KdogDS 21:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Present; this isn't an encyclopedia on the plot of star wars, it's a general encyclopedia, so plot summaries occur as they are read or viewed. — Deckiller 21:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really. Well then, this article needs work because it is all in the past tense. I had a feeling something was wrong. KdogDS 03:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tense

message: :Image:Dark Reaper.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Dark Reaper.JPG

message: Since the new games are *not* going to be called simply Star Wars: The Clone Wars, should we not move this title back to Star Wars: The Clone Wars (video game)? Rhindle The Red (talk) 01:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving title back

message: 99 out of 100 on Metacritic? I am sure as sure that it's not possible. 64.228.214.125 (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A big part of the problem is that the entire section is unsourced. Feel free to provide one if you feel that the current claim can be challenged. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-2/star-wars-the-clone-wars 
That's the PS2 Metascore.
http://www.metacritic.com/game/gamecube/star-wars-the-clone-wars
That's the Gamecube Metascore.
I can't find the Metascore for the Xbox version, though. 64.228.214.125 (talk) 23:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are You Serious? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 12:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2002 video game) →  – The year in the title is unnecessary disambiguation. The other video game with a similar title is Lego Star Wars III: The Clone Wars. Not similar enough to warrant extra disambiguation. Mika1h (talk) 11:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 January 2024