Talk:Crown Fountain

message: This article would be greatly assisted by some photographs for which a great deal of hard-to-follow verbiage now serves:
* close up of an LED brick
* close up of the water spout
* close up of the top
* overview and close up of the LED supporting structure
204.153.43.107 19:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo requests 

message: I have placed this article on hold because of one thing.  The opening sentence of the article says that the fountain is 'interactive,' however, after reading the article through, I fail to find out how the fountain is interactive.  Since this seems to be an important part of the fountain, this needs to be added before the article can become a GA.  If this is indeed in the article, it should be clarified, because I, as an outside reader, was not able to determine it.  When you are done, or if you have any questions, drop a note on my talk page. Cheers, Corvus coronoides talk 15:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the sentence "a plastic nozzle was fitted to the stainless steel frame to control the waterflow at a rate that will not cause the city to be liable for injury by interactive participants" discusses interactivity. I will add more.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)  15:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

text: This article doesn't have a lead. It could be broken down into a few sections. It's also overly illustrated, sandwiching text between images. LARA♥LOVE 22:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA On Hold

message: not only not  in this sentence;  In fact, many report that they have not only not seen their own digitized image, but have yet to hear of anyone who has seen their own image Negation Use consider revising.SriMesh | talk 03:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I believe this is a fantastic article, but I was surprised when I found out it was only a GA. I think this article could presently pass a FA assessment, and if not, it could with a couple of edits. I am willing to help out to get this article to FA status. Right now, I am going to put the article up for peer review in the hopes of getting this ball rolling. Torsodog (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured article

message: So, I have a new version of this article ready to go with a few more copy edits, but I was unable to post it because you have started to revert the edits. I've looked through the article's FAC pages several times and I am inclined to agree with the user TONY. The article is far too overlinked. While I believe some of his suggestions are go overboard, I too think you go a bit overboard. There needs to be a compromise, though it doesn't seem as though you are will to compromise. Torsodog (talk) 07:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Editing

message: I have done the lead and first paragraph after. I have a question aboiut this sentence: This capstone status evolved from its location: east of Michigan Avenue and across from the Chicago Landmark Historic Michigan Boulevard District; north of Monroe Street and the Art Institute of Chicago; west of the rest of the park and the lake; and south of Madison Street and the McCormick Tribune Plaza and Ice Rink. Since Millennium Park is the capstone, the sentence seems to be referring to it, but the description is of the location of Crown Fountain within Millennium Park. How about just The fontain has a prominent location in Chicago and the new park: east of Michigan Avenue and across from the Chicago Landmark Historic Michigan Boulevard District; north of Monroe Street and the Art Institute of Chicago; west of the rest of the park and the lake; and south of Madison Street and the McCormick Tribune Plaza and Ice Rink. ? Please let me know if I have introduced any errors. I am stopping for now, will be back in several hours Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 04:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That change would be fine.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  05:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks - thanks too for fixing the Front Yard bit. Hopefully the rest of my copyedits are OK. Will do more shortly, Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 11:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC copyedit questions 

message: What do we think of this picture? I've used this person's work for Cloud Gate in the past, so it is possible to get permission to use this free image. Is it worth going after? --TorsodogTalk 02:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: construction picture

message: Permanently installed artwork in the United States does not qualify for freedom of panorama. Is there any particular reason why the images in this article would be any different? It is pretty simple artwork, but I believe it is artwork protected by copyright nonetheless. NW (Talk) 20:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. For what it is worth, the FAC was reviewed with these images by both  and , who felt the images were free unless the videos were being displayed on the fountain. Could you say which images you specifically have trouble with? Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 01:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I certainly trust Jappalang's opinion on the images. The main image I was thinking of was :File:20080728 Crown Fountain at night (flank view) of south tower2.jpg. The lead image is tagged with a non-free fair use tag, so I thought maybe that might have to be as well. NW (Talk) 16:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. For what it's worth, the image in question shows the back side of the fountain (which is lit internally), so the blue light is not from the LED display on the front. Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 00:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image copyright concerns 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090210132409/http://www.timeout.com:80/chicago/articles/features/12287/big-house-on-the-prairie to http://www.timeout.com/chicago/articles/features/12287/big-house-on-the-prairie
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307000417/http://egov.cityofchicago.org:80/city/webportal/portalCategoryTreeAction.do?deptMainCategoryOID=-536887892&categoryPath=%2FCity+Agencies%2FCity+Departments%2FCity+of+Chicago%2FSub+Agencies%2FMillennium+Park%2FFAQ+Categories&success=FAQ&entityName=Millennium+Park&topChannelName=SubAgency&contentType=COC_FAQ&com.broadvision.session.new=Yes to http://egov.cityofchicago.org/city/webportal/portalCategoryTreeAction.do?deptMainCategoryOID=-536887892&categoryPath=%2fCity+Agencies%2fCity+Departments%2fCity+of+Chicago%2fSub+Agencies%2fMillennium+Park%2fFAQ+Categories&success=FAQ&entityName=Millennium+Park&topChannelName=SubAgency&contentType=COC_FAQ&com.broadvision.session.new=Yes
*Added  tag to http://www.ctbuh.org/Portals/0/Tallest/CTBUH_TallestUSA.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804220905/http://www.uiowa.edu/jmc/alumni/index.html to http://www.uiowa.edu/jmc/alumni/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927200733/http://www.archidose.org/Mar05/030705a.html to http://www.archidose.org/Mar05/030705a.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306082618/http://origin.newscenter.philips.com:80/about/news/article-15801.page to http://origin.newscenter.philips.com/about/news/article-15801.page
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917214300/http://usnews.com:80/usnews/photography/bpr_greenest/bigpicture.php?image=1 to http://www.usnews.com/usnews/photography/bpr_greenest/bigpicture.php?image=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710175721/http://www.electronicdisplaycentral.com/index.php/channel/8/id/757/channelname/LED+News to http://www.electronicdisplaycentral.com/index.php/channel/8/id/757/channelname/LED+News
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008170748/http://chicagoist.com/2004/06/03/crown_fountain_millennium_park.php to http://www.chicagoist.com/2004/06/03/crown_fountain_millennium_park.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: in 2021 you added the yellow banner at the top of the page expressing concerns about the article being overly detailed. Do you still have these concerns? If so, would you be willing to post a notice about your concerns below and perhaps bring this to FAR in a few weeks? Z1720 (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Prose banner