Talk:FTW

message: I apologise for the use of profanity in Wikipedia. I hope you can see this is unavoidable. This use of FTW far predates any internet slang, and is still in common use. It is a source of confusion as, outside of the internet, many people will interprete 'ftw' as 'f-ck the world', while gamers will think you are saying "For The Win."
Davidgoldman 03:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  F.T.W Tattoo 

message: There is no entry for it right now
Maybe move it to Internet Slang?
Sure it does not mean "For The Win"? That's the translation I most commonly hear.
FTW = for the win is so common nowadays I really think FTW should redirect to Internet slang 69.142.21.24 21:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Wiktionary 

message: Added: "FTW", a backward acronym for "WTF" used when there exists an even greater degree of confusion than called for by "WTF".
This has grown in common usage to the point where I felt it should be added. Though there was some initial debate as to whether "backward" should be prefixed by an adjective (such as "common" or "rare"), ultimately it was decided that the adjective should be avoided entirely.
Jinx Dojo 18:41, 14 Jul 2006 (EST)
* Debated and decided where, and by whom?  It seems the confusion would be whether the person actually meant "WTF" backward, or was using another acronym, such as "For The Win."  Also, what is the purpose of the citing the game "WTF" as a source? Mhoskins 17:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree. I don't think I've ever seen it used as "Fuck the what," and it will only generate confusion if presented as fact. I'm going to remove it. -- Digital Watches! 04:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen it either. --WikiSlasher 10:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor have I ever heard it, it will only confuse people.Troysteinbauer 19:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it will only confuse people??  isn't that the very reason ftw should be listed? ...to clarify and clear up confusion?  are we waiting for it to appear in the britannica before being acknowledged here?   given the number of times it's been reverted suggests its usage is far wider than one might think. --emerson7 | Talk 19:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I have received it (by IM, as opposed to literally hearing it) in exactly the meaning described by Jinx Dojo. I have begun speaking it as "Fuck the what?" in person to help popularize this definition. Sbywater 17:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My sister uses that phrase all the time, it's a simple case of inversion like if yoda said up the shut fuck.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.62.126 (talk) 03:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Re-added as it seems it was lost without a real cause. I use it that way as well, and "confusion" is exactly what that usage is meant to represent. 75.40.251.3 (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please stop. This has been taken off many times. Stop re-adding it. Enigma message 17:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it has, I am unaware of it. Why has it? And how does it being removed once qualify it to be removed again? There is significant support for it above. 75.40.251.3 (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't belong here; it's an unofficial acronym. · AndonicO Engage. 18:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unofficial? What constitutes it as unofficial? What makes it any less valid than the others listed? Simply the fact that you haven't heard it before? Please try to recognize that you may not have complete knowledge of every significant usage of an abbreviation. 75.40.251.3 (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, unofficial is perhaps a bad description; "original" is better. · AndonicO Engage. 18:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You still haven't explained why it is any less valid than the other definitions present. It is commonly used as demonstrated by other random individuals here. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it uncommon. I could understand this resistance if we were debating between definitions, but we are simply discussing the addition of a commonly used phrase. You are being ridiculous. 75.40.251.3 (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Found a (semi-)reliable source. · AndonicO Engage. 21:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "FTW", a backward acronym for "WTF" 

message: hello I'm a german-speaking user and I want to know wether "for the win" is grammatically correct or not. --Mikli 18:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically speaking, no, however, people well versed in internet culture tend to know what you're talking about. It's not proper English, so know your audience before using it. --Digital Watches! 03:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it's grammatical in most contexts, it just doesn't make much logical sense usually to refer to some reified win as the indirect object (yeah, it's in a preposition, but still) of your actions. 128.175.205.133 23:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, I'd like to consider it a lot like "Huzzah!". --67.177.39.202 22:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the win 

message: In the UK FTW often stands for Free The Weed and is used to show support for the legalisation of cannabis. But I am not sure if this is recognised all over the UK or just in my local Reagan
Zabouth 12:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FTW (UK) 

message: Seen multiple edits changing them around. I am not sure which one is correct. Something to look into. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.228.193.70 (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no wikipedia article about Fuck the world and For the win (which redirects to List of Internet Slang#F, and that link is there). Therefore, these entries (which happen to be explanations/defintions) don't belong on this disambiguation page, but rather on wikt:FTW (wiktionary - top right corner). And that's where they already are. Someone else has already deleted them from this dab page in the meantime. – sgeureka t•c 06:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with F-ck the World and For the Win 

message: Something is really a bit weird with this article; it used to be a disambig page, but is now just for 'for the win' instead? There is a Wiktionary entry on For The Win. I couldn't work out whether to revert to the previous disambig version or not.
--Smaug123 (talk) 08:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something's up... 

message: * file tree walk, a Unix library function for walking (traversing) trees (also not in tree walk Widefox; talk 15:29, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in articles 

message: Can we add those 2 meanings, derived from FTW? --78.156.109.166 (talk) 20:50, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuck the World and for the win 

message: * Training Fighter Wing
* Tactical Fighter Wing
* Fighter Wing, Training
* Fighter Wing, Tactical 
   At least three of the above phrases seem show up (no, not as articles that have been deleted since i wrote this!), in WP, in the names of military units that use "FTW" as part of an initialism (IIRC some times for German units, in which case note that the German word for "wing" -- at least the wing of a bird -- begins with F, not W.   IMO deserves research (by someone who gives more of a F than i do).--Jerzy•t 18:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military aviation