Talk:Nissan RB engine

message: perhaps nissan's own L20A or L series should be at least added to the (barely related) holden engine listed
NotPedanticReally (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: predecessor

message: Was there any specific criticism that led to the cleanup tag being applied?210.0.100.153 01:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess not. I think we should discuss removing the cleanup tag, quite a bit of work has been done since the tag was added in April. //Biggoggs 08:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright let's remove it.  It's gone!  Put it back if you feel strongly about it.  I think the article is roughly comparable with the SR and CA articles, which are unmarked. RB30DE 11:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: I had never heard of this being done before, which is not to say it's not possible.  I'll keep an eye out to find out what I can about this, but anyone else know more?210.0.100.153 01:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RD block compatible with RB head?

message: The motor pictured is an SOHC RB30E from an Australian R31 - 202.14.194.200 2006-06-16 20:10:50
:Yeah I think you're right, although if it were a Japanese R31 could it still be a 20?  I saw this engine (RB20E) in entry level Commodores and Cefiros.  RB30DE 03:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed my mind, I'm pretty sure this is an RB20E.  Look at the height of the rocker cover, and compare with RB30E.  You could fit the optional HR31 strut brace across the motor pictured, but there's no way that strut brace will go across an RB30E, it fouls the crossover pipe. RB30DE 05:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It seems to be a regular event that the single cam RB20E/T engines are being mislabelled as RB30E/Ts. They are not 3 litre engines. They are 2 litre engines as sold in Japan, and widely seen in New Zealand as well. They were not sold new in Australia which is where these edits are mostly coming from. RB30DE (talk) 08:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry for 'RB20' motor

message: Why is it that the RB Engine page is longer and more detailed than the Skyline /GTR page?
After all the RB is only one part of the Skyline as a car and the Skyline is more of a legend/symbol than even the more-than-legendary RB Series Engines which are rightfully considered one of the greatest Engine Series ever (especially the RB26DETT).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.88.36.26 (talk • contribs) 
:It just depends on who writes what when, it's random, or at least non-deterministic.  If you want to expand the GT-R page, go for it.  I was kind of thinking myself that the way the information is split across Nissan Skyline and Nissan Skyline GT-R could be improved.  The general Skyline article is quite long, and contains a lot about the GT-R, more than the GT-R page.  Perhaps the meat of the GT-R stuff on the Skyline page could go to the GT-R page.  Then there's Nismo GT-R Z-Tune floating around in the breeze which could be merged into GT-R. RB30DE 22:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The RB is used in more than just the GT-R; and as RB30DE said above, if you think the Skyline pages are short, feel free to update them. //Biggoggs 15:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Length

message: The RB26DE is a DOHC engine with 24 valves. It produces 220 ps @6800 rpm and 245 nm @5200 rpm. RB26DETT in NA (Naturally-aspirated engine) conversion and forging piston with high cam private tuning.  It was only used in the Nissan Skyline GTS-4 (R32).
:How about this?
:(From Japanese wiki) Autech made a small number of R32 GTS-4 Skylines with a naturally aspirated RB26DE conversion.  The engine used forged pistons, a higher lift cam, and a tuned ECU.  It produced 162 kW (220 ps) @ 6800 rpm and 245 nm (25.0 kgm) @ 5200 rpm. RB30DE 03:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RB26DE

message: I'm not going to add a cleanup tag because it's not that bad, but it does need some work. I've chopped, changed, and added to the article, but more could be done.
Some possible suggestions;
* I've moved the bore & stroke measurements into their own section- should they each be integrated with its own corresponding section?
* Power/torque figures seem unordered and scattered around the article- perhaps placing it in tables may make it easier to read?
* More `flowing' sentences, eg instead of `Etc. Etc. Etc.', get it to `Etc, so etc, because etc', if you get my drift. etc :)
//Biggoggs 14:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a new cleanup

message: Hey guys. I was just wondering whether there was any difference between the Neo and the Rb25 out of the R33 apart from the low emmission head. Anything internally?
Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.112.225 (talk) 11:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo RB25 vs. R33 rb25 

message: hey iv recently done an engine conversion on a nissan laurel c33 1989 and am wondering where the diagnostic plug is if it has one 
cheers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.169.19 (talk) 07:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  nissan laurel c33 1989 

message: Whats the deal with people trying to change the names of the engines? I have never seen them ever referred as "RFB", and I'm pretty sure this page is just under a siege of constantly vandalism... Can we do something here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A22:9500:25EA:92D0:1D7B:22FA (talk) 20:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: RFB Engine code

message: — Assignment last updated by Yuchaowang6300 (talk) 01:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities