lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gender feminism

message: The passage
:"The author now pauses to sing a little song I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves... Everybody's nerves... Everybody's nerves... I know a song that gets on everybody's nerves And this is how it goes...(repeat)
Now the author returns to her article on Gender Feminism. "
has no place in a wikipedia article. User:204.17.80.4 14:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Why does "Victim feminism" redirect here? It is a distinctly different concept. I bet someone deleted it and created a redirect because they found it offensive. Fuzzform 00:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur, victim feminism is not used in Sommers' 1994 book where she introduces gender feminism, and it was in use prior to this in 1993. The two might both be criticized by the same groups but they clearly have distinct meanings. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 05:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Victim feminism

message: regarding the cite of Who Stole Feminism, could you clarify which quote in the book has the term opposite individualist feminism? You put 320 but that's the total page count and just an index so I'm having trouble finding an excerpt to verify. Managed to find it in McElroy's LFw okay. Ranze (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro rewrite

message: Why is gender feminism described as gynocentric, since it's central concept is the cultural construction of gender? I also can't seem to find it anywhere in the cited source.. CorvusMonedula (talk) 13:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gynocentrism 

message: Should this page either (A) redirect to  as was done for Equity and gender feminism, (B) become a disambiguation page, or (C) be kept as an encylopedia article? These options and others were discussed here recently with a result of no consensus. Other suggestions are welcome. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment: merge proposal 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect History of gender feminism. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Paradoctor (talk) 17:08, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of gender feminism listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Stock and commodity market managers

message: This category is a bit similar to Category:Money_managers. Shawnc 14:34, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This category name does not make any sense. Shawnc describes it (accurately) as similar to :Category:Money_managers. THAT category is named correctly. There are money managers. There are no "stock market managers". There are no "commodity market managers". That term makes no sense in the context of the financial services industry. There are stock market portfolio managers, equity investment managers etc. There is no person nor entity that is a manager of commodity markets or manager of stock markets. It would be a regulatory role if there were one. This category needs to be renamed or better yet, deleted, as it would include hundreds if not thousands of articles in Wikipedia. --FeralOink (talk) 07:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ajoene

message: I found these sources, may be useful in expanding the article:
J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1984; 106(26) pp 8295 - 8296 and Carcinogenesis, Vol. 23, No. 4, 573-579, April 2002.
Ben (talk) 08:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: What kind of chemical bond is that right in the middle where 2 carbon bonds 'cross'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.56.64 (talk) 23:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the systematic name it should be a double bond. There is a similar image with the correct bond, so I put that one into the article. --Szaszicska (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical Bond?
Talk:John Bailey (British actor)

message: Since the article is new (I started it yesterday) and has at most three external links, why don't we deleted John Bailey (UK) and keep John Bailey (actor)?  proteus71 15:11, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: According to the official General Register Office Death Index the date of birth of 'John Albert Bailey' was 26 June 1912 and this corresponds with a reference in the Birth Index for a 'John A Bailey' born in the Lewisham registration district. Information parked here waiting for a secondary confirmation. MilborneOne 21:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth
Talk:Mary Ormond

message: The article on Mary Ormond is a good one, if only for the purpose of intriguing a scholar enough to do an exhaustive research on the topic. Just a couple of points: The genealogy link in Dan East's first paragraph doesn't seem to go anywhere. Is there another way to search it? I read somewhere that Mary Ormond was blind - anybody ever seen that? The best source for family records from that era are family Bibles or old church documents - but they are pretty rare from those days. Do we have anything like that for Ormond?A lot of "sources" about pirates eventually trace back to a "Captain Johnson"s book. Some scholars believe this person was actually Daniel Defoe and that a lot of his info was either heresay or made up (I don't know or have an opinion either way). But trying to find hard evidence or reliable info ("proof") on these characters is surely difficult.Engr105th 10:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy 

message: The Wiki article states she may have been "offered as a gift to" Blackbeard's crew...but I cannot find any reasonably researched reference to say so...I don't really object to that remark being there (after all, this is very minor historical character), but would like to know where the info comes from...????.... Engr105th 05:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her Fate 

message: According to the truth of reality, Mary Ormond has never existed. Nathaniel Mist had a lot of errors in his book about Blackbeard's true identity. Kennythenuker (talk) 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The truth about Mary Ormond.
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Canadian blogosphere

message: This is really getting out of hand.  Is there any hope for this Afd to close as anything other than a "no consensus"?  Is there any hope for people not to get pissed off at each other?  Can we tone down the nationalistic BS and talk about the article?  Most of the world doesn't care about whatever silly Canada/US rivalries may exist.
There's a lot of words being put on the page, but I don't see that a lot of communication is happening.  For those that are just saying "this is important" or "this is notable", you have to remember that WP is meant to be an encyclopedia.  Articles should use reliable sources.  Blogs and message boards are specifically not to be used as primary sources, and for very good reason.   
Wikipedia, by design, is not going to have good coverage of emerging social/political trends.  If the impact of blogging on Canadian politics hasn't been covered in enough reliable sources, we can't have an article about it, no matter how important it is.  If such sources can be found and used, great.  If not, just wait a few years.  If this is actually that important, good sources will certainly cover it in time.
I wish everyone would please remember, we're not talking about shutting down anyone's websites or suppressing anyone's freedom of speech.  We're simply talking about what belongs in the encyclopedia.  Saying "blogs are crap" or "stop being anti-Canadian" adds nothing to the discussion, and causes unhelpful strife.  Friday 15:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

message: *Article
I counted 4 delete votes and 1 keep as illegimate due to possible sock/meatpuppet activity, more than likely due to the GNAA presence here. 
*Content
Merge contingent was split, and ultimately not large enough to constitute a consensus even if united.As a result, this afd won't determine a decision on any transfers of the information in the article to any other page. Karmafist 16:48, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure Notes
Talk:Muisjes

message: "Every supermarket in the Netherlands sells boxes of muisjes."
""De Ruijter" is currently the only brand in production of muisjes."
The German supermarkets Aldi and Lidl sell very few products that are not a house brand. So this may be one of the rare exceptions (I doubt it but I'm not sure) or they don't sell muisjes at all (to my knowledge they are not terribly popular when no babies are around, but maybe that's just me) or they have, in fact, their own brand. Since both of these supermarkets have no online business, I'll have to check next time I visit them. So what you just read is a mental note-to-self, really. W3ird N3rd (talk) 21:57, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of these statements is probably untrue.
Talk:Mal de debarquement

message: I find it funny that there's not an article (or maybe just not a link to it) in French.--Piroteknix 01:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: French

message: External links on Wikipedia are supposed to be "encyclopedic in nature" and useful to a worldwide audience.  Please read the external links policy (and perhaps the specific rules for medicine-related articles) before adding more external links.  
The following kinds of links are inappropriate:
*  Online discussion groups or chat forums
*  Personal webpages and blogs
*  Multiple links to the same website
*  Fundraising events or groups
*  Websites that are recruiting for clinical trials
*  Websites that are selling things (e.g., books or memberships)
I realize that some links are helpful to certain users, but they still do not comply with Wikipedia policy, and therefore must not be included in the article.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Should this article title be in French, in the English Wikipedia? I think it should be renamed disembarkment syndromeSidP (talk) 05:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: It's called rare, but no information given as to what that means.  Is it really rare?  How rare?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.228.193.5 (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rare? 

message: As stated above, sources one and two are the exact same. Same DOI etc. They are just cited in different styles, one with the abbreviated journal and author names, one without. I am new to editing Wikipedia and have no idea how to correctly change this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.102.113.145 (talk) 11:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 1 and 2 are the same 

message: I think I have this after a week skiing and a 28 hour coach journey. The Neurologist are saying it won’t be linked to skiing. 109.144.16.30 (talk) 12:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnosis
Talk:Ranbir Kapoor

message: Update his schooling - BOMBAY SCOTTISH SCHOOL and college - HR COLLEGE OF COMMERCE AND ECONOMICS 146.196.39.226 (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 July 2022 (2) 

message: I would like to request the change of photo on this page as this photo is irrelevant to the actor now. I want to put a more recent photo since this has been changed by what it looks like the PR to spread unnecessary hatred against the actor. Muskaaanmalhotra (talk) 15:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 15:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2022 

message: , infobox parameters note say that editors can add, Relatives info in relatives parameter but some editor deleted it. There is family part is written but why not specifically mention notable relatives - Mahesh Bhatt (Father-in-law), he is Alia Bhatt's father. I suggest to discuss it here who have objections. It is vandalism removing source info without reason just because you think it shouldn't be there. Why a last editor want reder to go through family part of infobox. If there is parameter is present for relatives, why don't editors write it directly? Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Is anyone trying to create some narrative here in this page , because i have seen how the brands he is endorsing and positive aspects are even not mentioned but even the budget of movies is mentioned in summary which is not required at all.
Plus negative points about a movie are mentioned when it is said by majority not by just a particular person , HERE IT IS WRITTEN THAT HIS PERFROMANCE IS NOT LIKED IN BRAHMASTRA , but there is nothing like that ,editors just took one person review and decided to write in his wikipedia ? What is this going on? Don't do vandalism 103.214.60.207 (talk) 02:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negativity  

message: Wedding date shows April 2022 and the first borns date is November 2022 116.74.170.194 (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wedding Date 

message: Ranbir Kapoor made his Bollywood debut on Saawariya in 2007. Nobel X300 (talk) 02:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranbir Kapoor on Bollywood debut
Talk:Phosphorene

message: I checked this word in the dictionary, and I am not sure that it exists. --Adam 15:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This article was moved from phosphorenes but kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD debate link 

message: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24939-graphene-rival-phosphorene-is-born-to-be-a-transistor.html
92.249.162.47 (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  this link may be of interest 

message: Since we probably want to replace specialized references with reviews, here are the top ones based on citation frequency.
*Lu, J.; Yang, J.; Carvalho, A.; Liu, H.; Lu, Y.; Sow, C. H., Light-Matter Interactions in Phosphorene. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49 (9), 1806-1815
*Batmunkh, M.; Bat-Erdene, M.; Shapter, J. G., Phosphorene and Phosphorene-Based Materials - Prospects for Future Applications. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (39), 8586-8617
*Bagheri, S.; Mansouri, N.; Aghaie, E., Phosphorene: A new competitor for graphene. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41 (7), 4085-4095
*Allain, A.; Kang, J.; Banerjee, K.; Kis, A., Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14 (12), 1195-1205.
--Smokefoot (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Top cited reviews in Dec, 2016
Talk:Death by Degrees

message: I assume that the one listed on this page is the US release.  The Nina Williams article shows the Japanese box art.  So, should we have one, both, or delete one? - Hbdragon88 21:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  So which boxart? 

message: The "reception" entry is almost entirely made from an unverifiable POV, claiming that "the fans" have various opinions on the game. The game receiving mixed reviews is an encyclopedic fat, but the fans thinking that a sequel (that most likely won't ever happen) will be much better than the original has no encyclopedic value.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.37.159.240 (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been toned down, but the POV problem still remains. The whole "some fans think" is exactly the type of weasel words the Wikipedia policy asks to avoid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.37.154.253 (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Image is a fair use violation. Clearly there the fair use rationale is made is a lie.  I placed a better image on it why did delete it? LOTRrules (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Explain how the image is a fair use violation. FightingStreet (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "No free Alternative"? There are images on google that have smaller images than this...the fact that the fair use says no free alternative could exist is a clear violation because again there are lots of images with a simple websearch. LOTRrules (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: These images that appear on Google are copyrighted by Namco, just like yours or mine. That's what "No free alternative" means. Your image is just as good as mine, but let's use the one that was uploaded first. FightingStreet (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But yours violates the rule.  Its proportions are much bigger. Use a smaller one.  It'll avoid copyright issues. LOTRrules (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reduced its size now. FightingStreet (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for listening. LOTRrules (talk) 20:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Reading through the Gameplay section, it’s written more like a review. 2601:181:C300:6FE0:2D7F:3BDE:CE00:44BE (talk) 04:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article too opinionated
Talk:Bent

message: :This article has been moved into Bent, as the Bent (play) was created. There is no longer need for this page. cun 15:54, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. But please don't move pages by cut 'n' paste. It disconnects the edit history from the text. Next time, use the "move" tag at the top of the page, or ask an admin for help if the page cannot be moved. Eugene van der Pijll 16:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Many females from arabic-speaking countries have Bent in their names. Is this a personal name, or is it part of a patronymicon? Mollerup (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk pages are for discussing improvements to their associated articles, not for general discussion of article topics. - SummerPhD (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bent in Arabic names
Talk:Guðmundur G. Hagalín

message: So when did he die? I could never figure that out. Although he's surely not still alive, he'd be 107 years old.--T. Anthony 15:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Water rocket

message: in the fins section it states that on launching a rocket's cg will move backward just after launching, this is incorrect as on launching the g forces push the water (or whatever) toward the back (and gravity before launching) and it is then pushed out REDUCING the mass at the back of the rocket i can understand the cg of the propellant moving aft but the cg of the whole rocket will move forward because the mass of propellent is dissapearing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.165.215 (talk) 01:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah. As the propellant is used up, the water flows down to make up for it.- Wolfkeeper 02:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  center of gravity, fins section 

message: Please add a hatnote:
-- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 03:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 17:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Talk:Sun Yat-sen University

message: I think it would be more accurate for the location to say the city (Guangzhou), rather than the region (Guangdong).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.183.20 (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just a suggestion, but wouldn't a tabulated history of statistics be better than just the most up-to-date and current one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.249.112.57 (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics
Talk:Worldwar

message: This article needs to explain some Race terms paranthetically, such as "landcruiser" and "killercraft". I don't have time right now, but I'll do it later today.--Peter Knutsen 16:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved Terminology to The_Race page, where it should be more appropriate. My memories of Auerbach are hazy, and I'd completely forgotten about Skorzeny and the Uranium. You should go ahead and add those parts, your memory is better than mine :)  Arasaka 22:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Race

message: As much as I enjoyed the series, I wonder if we should mention that the series has a completely inaccurate portrayal of Polish and Jewish resistances during WWII (i.e. Polish resistance role is vastly minimized, and large scale Jewish resistance is de facto invented for the purpose of the series)? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical inaccuracies

message: I'm almost done with the 4th book and wondering why the author didn't have anything in the series about the Panzerfaust.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.250.88 (talk) 09:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Panzerfaust

message: Is there going to be a merge with Tosev Timeline or not? From what I can see, no one has even attempted to argue a point. Dark hyena (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the time line covers two series of books, not just this one, I don't think a merge is a good idea. - LA @ 05:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: How come this page has been tagged so many times for almost a year and yet it appears no progress has been made on these issues?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.62.92 (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No Progess
Talk:Bhati

message: Suresh Kumar's book has been termed unreliable by senior editors. There is a discussion here , please check this discussion before adding his source again. Ranadhira (talk) 03:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suresh Kumar 

message: @ Ranadhira  i would like to know what source you are even trying to add to make Maharawal Jaisal Singh Rajput, as per the sources you have mentioned no where says the king to be of Rajput Caste, your source= is nothing. So don't edit without any sources just because you want to add Rawal Jaisal Singh to be Rajput, and other than that i had 2 sources from which the 2nd source was a 13th century book that's much reliable than anything you have provided so far, so don't change Wikipedia to your fantasies. 
The 13th century book= Kvjr0604 (talk) 07:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The source you are using is a primary source and therefore cannot be used as a reference here. As for your question there are citations with quotes so please read and check them. Ranadhira (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhati Jat  

message: Add gurjars also as Bhati is a popular gurjar clan in UP and other North Indian states. Sachinbhatimrt17 (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a reliable source. RegentsPark (comment) 17:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2023
Talk:Sinaia lead plates

message: I have removed the following dead link.  If anyone can find a live version, feel free to restore it.  Thanks.  --Reuben (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link culled

message: This was a section of the article page (I changed from level 2 to level 3 heading when I moved it here).  I'm not convinced this adds to the article since the 'translations' are out of context. RJFJR (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to talk page

message: What is left to do before we remove the clenaup tag?  Have we addressed the OR and POV concerns? RJFJR (talk) 18:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More to cleanup? 

message: Why remove the   templates where entire paragraphs obviously don't cite any source? --Codrin.B (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why remove citation needed templates? 

message: ...can be moved to  and cross-referred if preferred/more suitable for WP. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research components