Talk:New Kids on the Block

message: I did a search on Amazon, and I can't find a Shel Silvestein book of poems entitled "New Kids On The Block", but anyway, if you think it's worthy of a Wikipedia article well and good.  However, it means we have a name clash.  I guess we should create an article that contains pointers to "New Kids On The Block band" and "New Kids On The Block book".  Is that OK? --Robert Merkel — Preceding undated comment added 01:19, 29 November 2001 (UTC)
replies: text: -its actually called "the new kid on the block" and it was written by jack prelutsky. easy mix-up since it was similar to shel's style. it was a pretty cool book. hope this helpsWhitey138 18:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Book with same title

message: Somebody with NKOTB knowledge please pretty-fy this page? It breaks my heart to see such an unattractive Wiki page devoted to my favourite 80s boy band. 24.215.63.110 04:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Thumbs Down

message: I'm aginst the merge.  I can write Danny's article.  I was a big blockhead back in the day and collected articles for years after they disbanded.  I think if the other four members have their own article, Danny should too.  I'll have it done by 4/1/06.  G312 19:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Against the merge

message: With their first 9 singles reaching the top ten in 1988-1990, it is hard to disrespect NKOTB.  Compared to the Backstreet Boys, NKOTB experienced greater success in the U.S. because the Backstreet Boys never had a #1 single in the U.S.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.29.149.88 (talk • contribs).
:Good point, User:70.29.149.88. They did sell out more concerts than Backstreet and NSYNC, and they had nine singles in the top ten over a two year period. That cannot be considered a failure. Their albums sold well: the self-titled one sold well after the second album (nearly 10 million, 8 million in US and 2 million overseas), Hanging Tough, MMXmas, Step by Step, and No More Games all sold very well. Face the Music did become a critical success, if not commercially. Overall, NKOTB were the boy band of the 20th Century. --Jonathan.Bruce June 7 2007, 09:42 PM (UTC)
::im a bit of a fan of both NKOTB and BSB but i gotta disagree that NKOTB are the boy band of the 20th century, just because an artist has more success in the US than someone else dont mean nothing, BSB never really experienced the backlash and have never really released an unsuccesful album, apart from there first which wasnt even released in the US. So there story is kinda similar to NKOTB but BSB's two most unsuccesful albums sold like 6 and 13 million copies worldwide, while there most succesful has sold close to 30 million copies, aswell as that they completed the successful Never Gone tour last year which was an arena tour, this was like NKOTB during a time were pop music and boybands weren't the cool thing, unlike NKOTB though who ended up in theatres and having to cancel the tour. So NKOTB boyband of the 20th century, i think not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.154.96 (talk) 02:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually NKOTB were the boy band of the 20th century BSB more like 21 century, NKOTB knew when to stop by BSB has released to albums and had little succes the most recent sold about 100,000+ and i am not lying. NKOTB most recent sold that many in a week. backstreet boys came during the time when the music business was selling records like crazy, NKOTB did good for the 80s when record sales weren't that good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.0.85 (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is clearly written by their fans. I don't see it mentioning about their recent failures: angry fans in their cruise, Full Service concert cancellations, and poor Casio tour reviews on Ticket Master.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meg74 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hard to disrespect NKOTB

message: Back in the 80's some girl told me that one member of NKOTB had roots from Yugoslavia. Anyone that can confirm? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.187.201.102 (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Yugoslavia 

message: :Image:New Kids on the Block-Hangin' Tough (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:New Kids on the Block-Hangin' Tough (album cover).jpg

message: Danny Wood performed before "10 paid attendees" ? Is that some kind of joke? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.51.191.70 (talk) 07:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Wood's audience 

message: :Image:Stepbystep album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stepbystep album cover.jpg

message: :Image:Step by step nl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Step by step nl.jpg

message: Njs4ever.com scored an interview with Danny Wood in the summer of 2007 -- it's over an hour long and on YouTube, but I have also created a "Pop Stand" page to serve as an easy place to find it. It's VERY candid, and very informative, and frankly, I'm not understanding why its inclusion on the NKOTB wikipedia page is being deemed "irrelevant" or inappropriate since reunion talk is discussed, before ANYONE was even thinking about it in 2007 (besides the reunion attempts by MTV and the Bands Reunited series). I will be adding it back on....if you have questions, please reach out to me directly. Just click "contact" on the website's side bar. Thank you.
Andrew Knyt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knyte77 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NKOTB - Danny Wood Interview

message: Hey girls, I know Pinkadelica who removed it meant well, but I'm a NKOTB fan too, I was the one who added the info about the American Music Awards, but I saw you removed the unexplained changes I added, I guess I should've explained it, I corrected the info about Joey Mcintyre's first album, because it was certified Platinum since then, not just Gold, also the New Kids are trying to like get away from Maurice Starr's "puppet masketeers" image, that's why i removed Maurice Starr from the top of the article to give more credit to the new kids themselves, because you know when people in the media read their wikipedia, maurice starr's name is gonna be up there on the top again, and it could spur their anti-new kids manufactured thing, you know what i'm sayin, if we remove maurice starr from at least the top of the article, then it gives more credit to the guys, well anyway, go New Kids, love to all the blockheads! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.25.3.67 (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read this 

message: There is an ongoing dispute over the fair-use images that are currently in this article. I don't see the need for so many fair-use images here, but whenever I've removed them, I've found that they've been restored (see edits like this and this). I admit I'm no expert with images, but from my understanding of the image policy, these images shouldn't be here under at least 3 counts:
# None of them have a fair-use rationale for this article.
# They appear to be used to "decorate" the article rather than to educate the reader.
# There is no need for excess fair-use images in an article.
I do not think that these images are appropriate, but can we discuss this rather than revert-war over the images? Acalamari 19:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree- I would like to say that I am fairly experienced with images, and their use here is completely excessive. I am going to remove them now, and I request that others do not. Even if you disagree with our (standard) interpretation of the non-free content criteria, at least respect that we should err on the side of caution until we have discussed it. J Milburn (talk) 20:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So how do you explain the Backstreet Boys have the same thing on their article and other popbands? And they have the exact same license as this one? (Fadiga09 (talk) 21:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely because someone who is experienced with images hasn't recently viewed those articles and removed the images in question. The fact that there are images incorrectly used in other articles doesn't mean it's okay to use them incorrectly in this one. As with this page, those will need to be sorted out as well. Acalamari 21:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

text: (ec)Because other editors have made the same mistake? I am happy to remove misused images where ever I find them- I will look into the Backstreet Boys now. In any case, if you accept 'this other article has it!' as a valid argument, then I am sure I could find more articles that don't have images like this. Maybe if you started pointing at featured articles/lists that abuse non-free images we could talk- until then, no. J Milburn (talk) 22:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The images 

message: Someone keeps on editing my edits. I was just trying to clean up the article. -XYZ1003 — Preceding unsigned comment added by XYZ1003 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: My first instinct on seeing the "Full Service Tour" information added was the same as that of the person that removed the info, that it wasn't a separate tour. However, if you read the source cited, it states:
:"The Full Service Tour kicks off May 28 in Atlanta and makes stops all across the U.S., wrapping up July 18 in the Woodlands, Texas. Tickets for the tour go on sale Friday."  (http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1608119/20090330/new_kids_on_the_block.jhtml)
So clearly it is a separate tour; maybe there is no break between the tours, but they are still separate. --Susan118 (talk) 04:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Service Tour 

message: I'm removing the recently added section about British boy band Take That because 1)It doesn't have anything to do with NKOTB, 2)No references, and 3)Even if it was relevant, it shouldn't be in the lead section.  Please feel free to discuss if you disagree. --Susan118 talk 22:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Take That" 

message: There is a Dutch TV series that's called New Kids on the Block; after the first two seasons abbreviated to New Kids (Dutch Wikipedia page). It's currently being broadcast by Comedy Central and is starting to get quite popular in other countries as well, especially in Sweden and Germany (German Wikipedia page). DJ Paul Elstak created a song for the New Kids Turbo movie that'll be released in about a week (IMDb, Dutch Wikipedia page). The series is named after the American boy band. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 23:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Kids; Dutch series 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New Kids on the Block. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929121030/ to 
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on New Kids on the Block. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/the-top-25-teen-idol-breakout-moments-20120511/new-kids-on-the-block-1989-19691231
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.etonline.com/music/102481_New_Kids_on_the_Block_and_Backstreet_Boys_Team_Up_for_Tour/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbc.ca/arts/music/take_that.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vh1.com/artists/news/1443264/20010430/new_kids_on_the_block.jhtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100823041748/http://www.cria.ca/goldplat.php to http://www.cria.ca/goldplat.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I know Backstreet Boys have been active for longer and that might explain a page dedicated only to their awards.
I refuse to believe NKOTB have so few awards in comparison.
Can anyone tell if there is nothing else for NKOTB?
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 03:36, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards section 

message: In the 2013-present section this line sticks out as... I mean a BTS fan had to write this, right? What's the relevance? "One thing to point was during the concert, K-Pop Boyband BTS were vibing and enjoying New Kids On The Block and New Edition's Performance. The memorable and goose-bump feeling comes off to New Kids singing Hangin' Tough , making everyone waving their hands in good vibes."
I'm hesitant to just flat out delete it, but I can't see why it's even in the article. Who cares if BTS listened to their concert, why is that historically significant? Can you cite "everyone waving their hands in the air in good vibes"? Is "goose-bump feeling" an academic term? IDK, I'm not sure what to do about it so I figured I'd bring it up in here to see what everyone else thought. Evil taco (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues, awkward phrasing?

message: I saw this article from Billboard magazine about their new clip "Bring Back the Time".  https://www.billboard.com/music/pop/new-kids-on-the-block-bring-back-the-time-video-donnie-wahlberg-interview-1235038429/ I don't know if there enough infos to put an entry about this song. --Sd-100 (talk) 16:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bring Back the Time