lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canada (disambiguation)

message: I greatly expanded this dab page as a result of its AfD nomination. However, I think that some of the entries I added deserve to be pruned, or placed in another listing. Here are some thoughts on this:
# Many government of Canada agencies and departments have "of Canada" appended to their name. These should be excluded from the list (I don't think I added any that match this criterion).
# Some of the entries in media and business should be deleted; perhaps they could be placed in a listing such as List of organizations and businesses with Canada in their name (though a better name needs to be found for it).
# Some of the entries that occur before the section entries should be sorted and pruned accordingly.
Also, I'm certain I've missed all sorts of entries. I recall several locations in the USA with the name Canada, but I can't find any of them via google or on Wikipedia. Mindmatrix 18:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pruning of the list

message: I've removed the reference to "SkyTrain" from the Canada Line description.  The Canada Line will not use the Bombardier SkyTrain technology or brand (see Canada Line), so the reference is incorrect. DoctorElmo 21:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada Line 

message: I've added the category Companies and placed the Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company in it. This is because few, if any, people actually state the full name rather opting for simply "The Dominion of Canada" Trump 00:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominion of Canada General Insurance 

message: There seems to be a conflation of the country with the Spanish word meaning "glen."  Should there be some distinction in the disambig? Fishhead64 06:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have made appropriate edits (I think). Corticopia 21:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canada versus cañada
Talk:Kingsway (Vancouver)

message: Is it truly named for Kingsway in London?  Locally, I've been told that it is named for King Edward VII. Fishhead64 19:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely possible since King Edward died in 1910, 3 years before Westminster Road (also Vancouver Road) was renamed to Kingsway. Another possibility is that King George V visited Vancouver in 1901 with his wife when he was the Duke of Cornwall. --Usgnus 20:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's "Kingsway," period. This is verified by the street signs and by maps. In this way it is analogous to Broadway, no definite article required. Lots of thoroughfares in British Columbia are designated _______ Way. The definite article makes no more sense here than it would with _______ Road. fishhead64 (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The Dumfries-area picture seems of low quality. Can a better one be added? If not, I propose it be removed. Thoughts? Thanks, Hu Gadarn 20:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture at Dumfries 
Talk:Socialist Youth Front

message: but I deleted a large section, which seemed to be copy / pasted part from SUF's website including lots of "we". this part should be seriously rewritten before being reintroduced in the article in order to meet Wiki standards. Bertilvidet 18:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry folks, 
Talk:Louis-Armand de Lom d'Arce de Lahontan, Baron de Lahontan

message: This wikipedia article appears to be a word for word copy of this sites article.  I don't know which was written first but am assumeing not the wikipedia article.  We probubly are not allowed to copy material like this are we? zorkerz 21:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: Anyone know what is the generally accepted term for North American Natives? zorkerz 21:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native American or Indian
Talk:Conservative Party of Canada candidates in the 2004 Canadian federal election

message: * Oppose. This type of article is good compromise for a collection of otherwise non-notable individuals who never held public office and whose only connection is running as candidates in this election. If this was separated into multiple articles, I'd be nominating them for AfD. Atrian 18:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bloedel Floral Conservatory

message: Can Anyone suggest what they'd like in the pictures?  I'd be happy to go take some shots on a nice day, if I have some idea of what's wanted. Apfejes 20:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very kind of you.  I don't think we need too many pics.  Three or less should suffice.  One outside shot for sure, showing the entire dome in its setting.  For inside shots, maybe just get some good exposures of trees, flowering plants, birds, and butterflies. Good luck!  --Ds13 20:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem - I'll be out of town for a week, but I'm on it when I get back. Apfejes 00:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Phantagram

message: I belive the company has also released the game 'Phantom Crash', but am unsure of their exact involvement in makeing the game. What I know for certain is that Phantagram is included in the opening credits of the game. Should it be added to the list? The game also lacks an article, which doesn't do it justice.
              ( Guest, The-Edge )
I am removing the statement that claims that Phantagram is also popular for the development of "an earlier game for the PC."  Being that the ealry PC game isn't stated, that statement tells us nothing.  Also, I'm moving the references of the other games in the Kingdom Under Fire series to a list of games that have been developed by Phantagram at the bottom for a more streamlined look.
Kramertron 19:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Phantom Crash?
Talk:Four Branches of the Mabinogi

message: I moved the long description here from the main article, following the convention of not giving away too much of the plot without a warning.
--GwydionM 19:10, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I have tided the article, adding the circumflexes accordingly to the correct names (side note: It is Brânwen / Bendigaidfrân etc. She is not known by any other name in Welsh, and should not be known by any other in different languages (brân being 'crow' in Welsh), and changed some wordiness of some lines. Xxglennxx (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article clean-up
Talk:Hans Jakob Christoffel von Grimmelshausen

message: This Wikipedia article is close to verbatim from the Britannica 1911 Encyclopedia, which is generally pretty authoritative, but there are several points of variation between the facts cited in it and more recent editions of Britannica. In particular the names of persons he entered into the service of, given in Britannica 2000 as Reinhard von Schauenburg of Offenburg, and Johannes Rüffen of Strasbourg, versus Franz Egon von Fürstenberg as cited in the present article. Perhaps an expert on Grimmelshausen exists "out there" who could clarify these discrepancies? Nodal Plane 13:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  facts cited may be incorrect 

message: Looking good; now can we have all german translated as well?
People who read HCG and german-speaking people may not need it, but remember the global scope of Wikipedia.
Cheeri-o N. Macchiavelli 18:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation needed
Talk:Sedgefield Ball Game

message: If this article is to be merged or deleted please give reasons Talskiddy 23:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Artin's conjecture on primitive roots

message: The reference to "at most two exceptional primes for which Artin's conjecture fails" is redundant, and therefore confusing.  Is there a special kind of prime called an "exceptional" prime? I don't think so.
If not, then the statement would be a lot clearer if it avoided drama and omitted the word "exceptional", reading simply:
". . . at most two primes for which Artin's conjecture fails."Daqu (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heath-Brown's result needs rephrasing, I think 

message: I think that there is something non-grammatical about the opening para which says "states that a given integer a which is not a perfect square and not −1 is a primitive root modulo infinitely many primes p". I think there should be a word - "of" or "for" or something between modulo and infinitely. However this sentence is so confusing that I can't work out what it should be. -- SGBailey (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: “Modulo” is a preposition, and it (rather than “for” or “of”) is the correct one. I’ve unlinked it in the hope this will make the sentence structure more clear.—Emil J. 16:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening para wrong

message: From the OEIS sequence page, taking the 10000 elements included there, the 10000 fall below value 310092.  Primepi(310092) = 26808, yielding the ratio 10000/26808 = 0.3730--Billymac00 (talk) 01:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example taken further
Talk:Sky Sports HD

message: Suggest this article is merged into the main Sky Sports article. I do not enough there is information here to merit it's own article. Scarletman 19:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - Given the inital proposal, the tags were the wrong way around (i.e. to/from).  I have altered them accordingly.  DJR (Talk) 15:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Michael E. Knight

message: Could someone confirm and amend Michael's article page for the following:  I beleive that Michael is related to Christopher Knight of Brady Bunch fame.   I also beleive that their father got the boys involved in acting at an early age.   I think there is enough current crossover appeal to both of their careers to make that connection more public.
I think Michael also had skin cancer.  Can someone confirm that.
+Michael is not related to Christopher Knight. 
+Michael did have skin cancer in the early 2000s. He stated this at Super Soap Weekend.
24.187.226.138 (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of poker hands

message: One variant of poker, often called "Canadian Poker", allows three pair as a valid hand. The rest of the game is identical to Texas Hold'em. In this variant, three pair beats two pair, but not a full house. This is an exception to the stated "always five cards in a hand" rule. There are probably other variants with similar rules. 
12.106.111.10 21:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't this rule be applied to any type of poker variant with community cards? That would just make sense to me. I've been trying for a couple days to stress that a three pair hand is a legitimate poker hand, but my brother and parents keep saying it isn't. This just in: Meh is a real word now, too! Gotta love The Simpsons... -Mattokunhayashi (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

text: In those kind of games, it is also possible to have 2 sets of 3 of a kind.  162.255.123.42 (talk) 06:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three pair 

message: I was puzzled by the statement in the section on 'Flushes' that "Under ace-to-five low rules, flushes are not possible".  Whether an ace counts as high or low makes no difference to it's suit, e.g. hearts or spades, so why doesn't a hand like 10, 7, 6, 3 and Ace of hearts count as a flush?   On looking at the article on ace-to-five low games, it seems that there is just a separate rule in those games that flushes don't score with any particular value.  So it is not that a flush is not possible , just that it doesn't count as higher than any other hand.  If this is correct someone might try and clarify this section.2A00:23C8:7907:4B01:492A:659B:43BD:CE61 (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In ace-to-five low, hands that would otherwise be flushes do score with a particular value: they score as high-card hands. Thus, flushes are not possible in any meaningful sense. Hpesoj00 (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Flushes in Aces-Low?
Talk:NRX

message: Added in a paragraph about the partial meltdown in the 1950s...too important a part of this reactors life to leave out.
Burtonpe 19:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accident

message: The link http://www.nuc.umr.edu/nuclear_facts/history/history.html
was broken. I tried changing umr.edu to mst.edu but it is still broken. Charvest (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed!  Whitlock (talk) 02:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to "History of Nuclear Energy"
Talk:León Febres Cordero

message: for example: which is the country´s most desired goal. Intangible 19:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I'll write in Spanish, please translate.
El propio León Febres Cordero escribe así su segundo apellido en esta carta enviada al diario El Universo el 7 de abril de 2008, firmada de puño y letra. Su nombre completo «León Febres Cordero Ribadeneyra» puede leerse formando parte del texto en el tercer párrafo. Aquí encontré otra reproducción de la misma carta, cuyo texto también se encuentra transcrito en el sitio web de dicho periódico. Gustronico (talk) 05:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ribadeneyra 

message: There is much more information on him on the articles on him on Wikipedia in other languages. For those fluent in said languages as well as English, some of the info could be translated, and added to this article. P Cezanne (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand article
Talk:Rahan (comics)

message: Propose that the article be moved per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline, to fall in line with all the others using (comics). Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? MURGH disc. 20:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unopposed move completed. MURGH disc. 22:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Apathetic agnosticism

message: Possible copyright violation? The Articles of Faith section is taken - verbatim - from http://apatheticagnostic.com/ourchurch/faith.html. Can anyone verify? I'm not well-enough experienced with Wikipedia/copyright to investigate/tag myself...
:-Shane Lawrence 19:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so.  It just states 'what we/they believe' descriptively without comment.  I can't see the Roman Catholic Church claiming copyright over the Apostles Creed, or Islam over the Shahada. More to the point: Although I am a member of the UCTAA, I do feel that the article risks being an 'advert' for the church at the expense of discussing apathetic agnosticism as a belief.  There must be many people who have arrived independently at this viewpoint without ever having heard of either the church or its founder.  Perhaps somebody could expand the article to discuss apathetic agnosticism in general, and maybe reduce mention of the UCTAA (and any other organisations that may subscribe to similar beliefs) to references.  As the UCTAA is not in the business of forcing its beliefs down anybody's throats, maybe it could become a separate sub-article which you can choose to either read or not. 160.84.253.241 09:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this could be split into two articles: one solely about what apathetic agnosticism is, and another about the UCTAA.Clpo13 20:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: Nearly verbatim, but they are too apthetic to care one way or the other, it would violate their creed. But I do have a request in just in case.Drlizardo0 12:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restart

message: why does apathetic agnosticism redirect to apatheism? it's different -76.27.231.192 (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was AFD'd in March, resulting in the redirect. Tag added at top. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect
Talk:Rajaraja I

message: Raja raja 1 religion is Shaivism 2401:4900:483D:9840:0:0:833:41E9 (talk) 03:19, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. This seems to be a controversial change (see discussions here and here), and the discussion should ideally reach a conclusion before any edit requests are made. Aidan9382 (talk) 07:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2022 

message: NDanraj (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. The details are covered in the article, which present a more detailed explanation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2022 

message: That is incorrect 2405:3800:878:E8EE:6D52:CFC9:9E0B:6913 (talk) 07:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. SKAG123 (talk) 04:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The house of cholas is named as Telugu chola house Potapi.  

message: I am working to improve this article as suggested in the tags.  I am unable to vouch for the citations. I used existing one to apply as I revised the writing.  I will likely continue to work on this article in the same manner.  Kind regards to all Hu Nhu (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I continued to work through the article and sometimes the meaning of the original language lacked specificity. Consequently, my revisions may at times be inaccurate to the original writer's intent. Additionally, I cannot vouch for the citations.  While coherent, the content should be regarded as uncertain.  I find it curious that this article has a B rating.  It seems far to high.  This would, I believe, be best served if the article was entirely rewritten from the beginning of the writing and research process.  Kind regards to all.Hu Nhu (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: On 4 APR, I tagged a section with need for clarification.  There are several references to works without identifying what they are: poem, book, song, movie, play, and so on.  After inserting four inline clarification needed messages, I decided to draw attention to the entire section with this section tag.  Kind reagrds to all,Hu Nhu (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edits by Hu Nhu
Talk:Ski (driving stunt)

message: I noticed the Peugeot in the picture seems to have a white halo around it, particularly noticable on the underside and looks to me like it was superimposed. The car also seems a bit brighter than the background. I wonder if the car is really performing this stunt or is a special effect. A lot of auto stunts in recently made movies are being done in CGI. I never seen this movie though so I can't be certain. Cyberia23 19:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt it is CGI. My guess would be, it's a real car doing the stunt, but possibly performed on a stunt track in front of a green screen and superimposed into the background of the street. Since the tires are cut off at the bottom of the screen, it seems this is how it was pulled off. 66.72.193.196 20:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the bonus material on the DVD... (oh, and the white halo is present because I sharpened the image before uploading) κаллэмакс 14:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fake car?
Talk:The Shit is Bananas...B-A-N-A-N-A-S

message: I reverted my prod tag, since redirect made while I was applying it. --FloNight 20:09, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

message: My db-redirtypo tag was removed because this term applies to the redirected article.  I contest that.  It certainly appears in it, but honestly, who is going to type this in Wikipedia expecting to get anywhere, especially when you consider the punctuation and spacing, and the fact that the first word should be "This" and not "The."  I vote delete, it adds no value to Wikipedia.  --Chris 23:07, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Baden gulden

message: I'm confused about the relationship between this currency and the South German gulden. Was it a situation like the euro, where there were local versions of the same currency? I put a red-link for the South German Monetary Union because I think it would be great to have a page for it. I'd write it myself if I had any idea what it was. Ingrid 21:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: South German gulden
Talk:Adobe RoboHelp

message: Virtually the entire central section of the article is a cut and paste job from the adobe wesite http://www.adobe.com/products/robohelp/ - and reads like it... "a complete, flexible, and user-friendly system etc".  Although http://www.adobe.com/products/robohelp/ is quite legitimate as an external link, it has no merit as the main content of the article.  I am removing this, as the adobe copy is copyrighted material.  Tevpg 21:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut and Paste of Adobe Advertisement 

message: Is there more information about the tool itself that can be added to this article?  It was for this that I sought wikipedia's article on RoboHelp.  More information about its purpose, features, and usage would be appreciated.  Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.104.5.2 (talk) 20:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Content 
Talk:Sacramental union

message: An anonymous editor changed the final paragraph of the article to this:
::This view is correctly identified as consubstantiation in that it asserts the simultaneous presence of four essences in the Eucharist: that of the consecrated bread, the Body of Christ, the consecrated wine, and the Blood of Christ. However, it differs in that disagrees with some modern theologians in the ELCA that do not assert a "local" (three dimensional, circumscribed) presence of the Body and Blood in the sacramental bread and wine respectively.
This editor is a supporter of the Real Presence and is a strong supporter of Luther's position, but this editor does not realize that orthodox Lutheranism rejects a "Capernaitic" or cannibalistic understanding of the real eating of the body and blood of Christ. If the ELCA rejects a "local" presence, they are in line with orthodox Lutheranism in the Lutheran Confessions (cf. Formula of Concord VII), which rejects a "local" presence of Christ's Body and Blood. I reverted this article to the way it had been stated. We also have a NPOV issue here as well. drboisclair 20:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't we ask the ELCA what they believe? Of course, the full communion agreements complicate things. Here is what I found: official text of the Full Communion agreement Arch O. LaTalkTCF 23:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

text: PS: you can also ask questions here. Arch O. LaTalkTCF
I am familar with the passage you cite. We believe it is not Capernaitic because it is through a Divinly Instituted Miracle that happens spiritually through the Lord's Word, not because we don't eat the physical Body and Blood of Jesus under physical bread and wine.--192.160.64.49 19:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consubstantiation change 

message: For a second time a person changed the first paragraph's spelling of the original German expression. The idea was to have it read like Luther originally wrote it in his Great Confession of 1528. The way I put it in there was not the way it was actually in print, so I corrected it to appear in the same way as it appears in WA 26, 442.23. It would also be helpful to have the expression in the modern day German words and spelling.--Drboisclair (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The original German expression and the modern German expression