lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Secrecy of correspondence

message: Hello you guys, I've just uploaded that pic and cannot translate the matter into English. Would someone help me? This image should be inserted into the article along with a sentence or two. --Scriberius (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is irrelevant. This article is about a legal principle and a basic human right. Your image is more related to encryption, which is outside the scope of this article. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 02:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:   I disagree. This is not about scrambling of letters or numbers. The image uploaded by  is a pattern printed by e.g. banks on the inside of envelopes so as to make reading the letter against backlight impossible. It is very much connected to secrecy of correspondence. Your argument would also exclude pictures or mentionings of seals. This is just another technology to keep secrecy of letters intact. --Lommes (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic?

message: Could we get a list of countries (unless there is only the at the top) that have this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.212.253 (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of countries
Talk:Texas International Pop Festival

message: The link to the band Space Opera links to the science fiction sub-genre, rather than to the band.  The band isn't even listed under the dis-ambiguation page "Space Opera." 107.221.229.121 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space Opera 

message: I was there in 1969. It was the year before I went to Vietnam. It was a special time in my life. Does anyone know where I could get an original poster of the festival? 192.170.131.241 (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Festival
Talk:Creation biology/Archive 7

message: Cut from article:
:All of these ideas are heavily criticised.
Why would anyone criticize someone's religion? Who are these critics, anyway? 
There's another Wikipedia article that says that scientists and academics are not debating with Creationists. Or is "heavy criticism" not the same as debate? (Just shouting from across the street, I guess ;-) Uncle Ed 22:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What article ? SOME scientists are not debating with creationists, not all. I know some scientists refuse to appear in live debates with creationists because it gives creationism credibility. It gives support to the notion that a scientific debate is going on about the validity of creationism, which is not the case. -PhDP (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Science and religion

message: I've changed my mind on this. I reverted before because the Creation science category was already under the Pseudoscience category, and it's bad form to list something under both a category and its parent category. However, upon reading again more on the guidelines of categorisation, I see that "exceptions should also be considered when the article subject has a relevance to the parent category that is not expressed by the subcategory's definition." (see WP:CLS). I.e., the term Creation science doesn't immediately signify that it is pseudoscience, which is something very relevant to both the Creation science article and this one. For example, the Astrology article is both under New age and Pseudoscience, even though New age is already under Pseudoscience. Are there any other comments regarding this? GSlicer (t • c) 01:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you pretty much hit the nail on the head. Cat's aren't a tree so much as a network.  – ornis⚙ 08:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Also in agreement here. (although I'm actually not convinced that Astrology should be under New Age or that New Age should be under Pseudoscience so that may not be the best example. But I suppose that's a matter for another page). JoshuaZ 17:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pseudoscience category
Talk:Monologue (album)

message: This album is not independently notable, and even if it was, WP:NALBUM recommends merging to the artist page when articles are unlikely to grow beyond a stub. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Elysium (I Go Crazy)

message: I have the 12" single of this song and it has 6 remixes of the song on, not 4 - is this just my copy, or is the article inaccurate?--Jonnylinuxnerd (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 12" Single
Talk:Striker's Mountain

message: The page says 1987, but I have a videotape from December 1985 promoting this movie being broadcast on CBC.
Mjlarochelle (talk) 01:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What year was this released?
Talk:X-People

message: Does anyone have a reference for the X-people's secret identities, as I don't believe they are mentioned/used in any of the MC2 comics. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frogoat (talk • contribs) 09:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters civilian names-source?
Talk:Uropeltis ceylanica

message: Needs taxonomic review. ITIS is not a reliable source, and several of the taxa listed are apparently recognized now as subspecies or even species (according to Reptile Database). Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 15:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert needed

message: Someone knowledgeable about the subject needs to go through the "description" section and put wiki links on some of the more technical descriptions so that normal people can understand it too.  I tried to help it out, but couldn't find information on some terms, such as: "contiguous scales", "obliquely truncate" "bicarinate", etc.Editfromwithout (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical terms
Talk:Uropeltis liura

message: I think the image in the Taxobox is not Uropeltis liura, but rather Silybura melanogaster Günther, 1875 (non Gray, 1858). I realize that on plate XXXI in Günther (1875) this image is labeled as "B. Silybura liura". However, if one reads Dr. Günther's descriptions of these two species, and compares his descriptions with the two snakes both illustrated on plate XXXI, it becomes apparent that figure A. and figure B. are switched, probably due to a printing/proofreading error.  There is a good photo of U. liura, which fits its description, on the Reptile Database page. If it is not an violation of copyright laws, perhaps someone (with better computer skills than I) could put that photo in the Taxobox.
96.236.213.217 (talk) 12:26, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image in Taxobox?
Talk:The Poozies

message: I had loved the couple of songs sung by the Poozies that I had heard.  I just tonight decided to start listening to them more and after a song or two I realized they'd be what I would describe as a group "mostly relying on vocals with minimal instruments".  Wikipedia doesn't even give them that description, let alone the overly precise and jargon-filled description that means "Vocal with minimal instruments" Wikipedia would normally have.  Should this be added?  I added some minor, non-technical description just to help us poor layfolk...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.105.238.240 (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Talk:The Pyramids (band)

message: Is this the band responsible for the 1959 song Ankle Bracelet Drutt (talk) 09:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: clearly not. that was unmistakably a doo-wop bandToyokuni3 (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ankle Bracelet
Talk:Thailand's Next Top Model

message: I wonder that the Thai franchise had only one cycle aired. The show had never planned to produce a second cycle. See Philippines' Next Top Model, Cycle 1 merge to PNTM talk page. Since there was no confirmation to produce a second cycle and beyond. --ApprenticeFan Messages 11:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am strongly pro a merge. it seems that this show will not have another cycle anytime soon. 
Shameless (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Thailand's Next Top Model, Cycle 1 to this article
Talk:Tiffany Valentine

message: Article incorrectly states her tattoo is a heart with "Charles" written above it when it is in fact "Chucky"  2601:2C3:4300:8350:81A8:56E6:3EBF:3E3A (talk) 00:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tattoo
Talk:TAB Trackside

message: Updates made 14/07/2021 by User:PaddyTePou have been reverted.  The LPFM licence for 106.8FM is not held by Sports Entertainment Network Pty Ltd.
LPFM licence 224695 makes a group of frequencies including 106.8FM is available for use in New Zealand by anyone who meets the conditions of the general user licence (radio).RSM Search Register
In this case it appears that Sports Entertainment Network Pty Ltd has decided to use 106.8FM in WanakaSENZ Frequencies like TAB Trackside Radio did previously.
CapAlpha (talk) 02:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted Updates Made 14/07/2021
Talk:United Lutheran Mission Association

message: The reference to confessional Lutheran should remain as this was one of the foundational reasons for the formation of this group. The congregational form of governance is secondary and is covered later in the article under structure. As a current active member of this group I am fully knowledgeable of their theology, practice, motives, and historical origins. Jrshaw (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Difference-map algorithm

message: I've commented out the following statement:
:The set of fixed points in a particular application will normally have a large dimension, even when the solution set is a single point.
The iterated map is x ↦ x + β S, where S is the difference between the two projections PA(fB(x)), which is an element of A, and PB(fA(x)), an element of B. We see that x is a fixed point of the map iff S = 0, which means that PA(fB(x)) = PB(fA(x)), so this is a common point of A and B. Then, furthermore, PA(x) = x, so fA(x) = PA(x) − (PA(x)−x)/β = x. Likewise, PB(x) = x. So the common point in the intersection of A and B is x itself. This shows that x is a fixed point iff it is in the solution set of x ∈ A ∩ B. The set of fixed points and the solution set coincide, so one cannot have a larger dimension than the other.  --Lambiam 22:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed points and solution set 

message: I restored this section because the algorithm's origins can be traced to this particular application. Also, the reconstruction figure now has the necessary explanatory text.
 --Veit Elser 10:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phase Retrieval Section
Talk:Eastergoa

message: Okay, so what are/were the seven sealands? —Tamfang (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  one of the seven sealands 

message: Hello,
the sourcecode for West Frisian is used with the Stadsfries name; the West Frisian name is used first. However, according to the introduction of :nl:Stadsfries, Stadsfries is spoken in Leeuwaarden, but not part of Frisian. What should be done?
Kind regards,
Sarcelles (talk) 20:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadsfries/ West Frisian
Talk:Waianae High School

message: Class of 71, Horwath Kam & Sukdamto Foundation Scholarship - Annual $1,000 Award 2010-2012  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pele Mau (talk • contribs) 17:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scholarships & Awards
Talk:Francisco Xavier Castellanos

message: He not only clearly wrote this himself, he cited not a single real source and sucks himself off every other sentence. 
What the fuck has he done? Why does he have a wikipedia page? 2603:7000:2B02:4A45:9014:74BE:6ECD:A22F (talk) 22:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiographical
Talk:Livonia Police Department (Louisiana)

message: There are issues with the presentation of this article. Things such as "...with the position currently held by Chief of Police Brad Joffrion.", and "The main patrol vehicle used by this department is the Chevrolet Tahoe.", are dated and depend on constant update that is not necessary. Otr500 (talk) 03:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article problems
Talk:Slumach

message: The articles has tags that it may contain original research, and that it needs additional citations.  Could the person who added these tags indicate either here or within the article which statements are original research or need citations?  Thanks.  Plazak (talk) 15:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has numerous inline citations, so I removed the inline citations tag.  If anyone considers a need for additional citations for specific statements, please place  tags within the text, as appropriate.  As for the remaining tags, if those are still approppriate, please discuss why here on the talk page, otherwise they will be removed.  Anyone can tag an article, but that editor should be ready to provide reasons on the talk page.  Thanks.  Plazak (talk) 13:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't originally place the tags, but I cleaned them up using the "multiple issues" template. Right now, I would say the article is still not completely Wikified. And the citations are not full citations (is there a template for that?). Writers names are missing, and page numbers would be nice for the old newspapers, if known. If any sources are available online, they should be linked, preferably using the Cite web or related templates. I believe that the original taggers suspected some sort of hoax or spam due to all the references being to archives on the article creator's website. However, I personally have no issue with correctly linking to copies of any sources which were published before 1923. The main objection to user-hosted copies of articles is that they violate copyright, but sources published before 1923 are in the public domain. There is no reason not to link them. Yworo (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

text: It would make it much easier for editors to verify the content. No, it's not necessary, but it would be an improvement to the article. Yworo (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Take a look at WP:CITE. I recommend using the  templates, such as ,  ,  and . They all take a "url=" parameter and have the advantage that they will consistently format the citations correctly. Yworo (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR and additional citations tag
Talk:List of artistic depictions of Grendel

message: This section needs to be reorganized and sourced before being restored back to the article. -Classicfilms (talk) 06:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a few additions to the article with sources and have removed those listings from above. -Classicfilms 16:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section to be reorganized 

message: :::I have made a few additions to the article with sources and have removed those listings from above. -Classicfilms 16:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions and removals
Talk:Pan-Pacific Championship

message: Why didn't the A-League send a team in 2009?  Will they be participating in future tournaments? 207.58.192.150 (talk) 23:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No A-League in 2009? 

message: Anybody know if theres a PPC 2010 tournement planned? 
If you have any info can you reply on my talk page? 
Cheers, Nathan. Nath1991 (talk) 12:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPC 2010 

message: 2012 Hawaiian Islands Invitational
Not the same tournament but basically the same format?
Merge? or at least maybe I should just add a link at the bottom under see also. Ceezmad (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 Hawaiian Islands Invitational 
Talk:Atlasjet Flight 4203

message: According to CNN the number of fatalities is now given as 57 as there was a baby on board who hadn't been counted in the initial estimate.  I noticed that an IP making this change was reverted, but wasn't sure if that was because there is controversy over this report, or simply because it was incited in the edit and no-one else had seen it.  -- SiobhanHansa 18:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My reversion, at the time no source provided.  Well done for finding new source.  The Rambling Man 19:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of fatalities 

message: Maybe we can anb a few images from the turkish article. Circeus 01:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: * Support and oppose - Atlasjet Flight 4203 should only be merged with Atlasjet Flight 4203 if they do not remain separate, otherwise they should remain separate. - BillCJ 11:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I were who removed the merge template, because the two article title were same. If no, what is the difference between the titles? Nbuda (talk) 18:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the lack of clarity. The vandalism was by another user who added the tag in the first place. You did the right thing in removing it. - BillCJ (talk) 19:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It is said that Mossad (with CIA backing) has started a campaign to kill turkish intelligentsia. Recently three top-notch turkish aviation engineers (Huseyin Basbilen, Ali Insem Unal and Evrim Yangecen) were assasinated because they managed to reverse engineer the F-16 fighter plane's IFF (identify friend or foe) system, whose codes USA always refused to hand over to Turkey. This was needed to be able to discern turkish and greek F-16 planes over the Aegean Sea, but as a side effect Turkey can now also realize when zionist F-16's violate turkish airspace while attacking north Syrian targets, like in October 2007. This is why the three engineers were murdered and their deaths set up to look like suicides.
The sabotaging of a turkish arliner with six top scientists onboard fits this picture, jews want to rid arab and muslim countries of nuclear knowledge, so their Dimona-made A-bomb stockpile continues gives them hegemony over the entire middle east.
This downing may also be a retaliation for the downing of Siberia Airlines Flight 1812 where five top jewish bioweapons experts were killed. 82.131.210.162 08:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's all very interesting but is pure speculation without any reliable source.  The Rambling Man 08:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mossad? 

message: Second paragraph in section named Investigation, which begins "Upon investigation...".
Could the writer provide references for this information?  Below in the references, none are dated late enough to possibly describe the analysis of flight data.  Thank you.
Dorospoll (talk) 19:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source / Reference on given information.
Talk:Edge Side Includes

message: What is edge level dynamic web content assembly? --Abdull (talk) 17:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bingo!" 

message: I guess if there were examples of what it is used for, then we would find it easier to understand.
Are we talking about inserting adverts and news tickers into web-pages ?
Where is the edge of the internet ? Would that be my ISP inserting adverts into pages I view ? Or my corner shop ?
--87.194.174.252 (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications ? 

message: In my experience, this is used on a web farm, rather than by an ISP.  It's best explained by an example.  Suppose you're BBC News.  You're going to have hundreds of servers which serve requests.  However, they tend to be hidden behind a load balancer.  All requests for web pages on news.bbc.co.uk will go to that load balancer, which in turn determines which of the hundreds of servers to send your request.  This all works fine, but given that news pages don't change very frequently once they're written, it'd be desirable to cache the news page on the load balancer.  This will reduce the number of pages that need to be generated by the hundreds of servers.  Again, this is all fine until you want to put changing content on the article page.  For example, you want to include a bit of content that says "Most popular on the site today".  This changes all the time; far more frequently than the article changes.  So, this is where you use an edge-side-include.  
When a visitor requests an article, the load balancing proxy server will look to see if it's got it in its cache.  Most of the time it will.  It'll then read it, determine there's an ESI tag in it - if there is, it sees if that page is in its cache.  It then glues them together and serves them to the visitor.
I hope this makes sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonybob (talk • contribs) 17:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few use cases 

message: Why are there links to companies in the See Also section when there are already links in the body to each of the companies that support the spec? Seems like advertising. If they had content on their sites that discussed the issue that might be a different story. -- Dougher (talk) 01:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  fixed Justinc (talk) 11:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why links to companies in See Also section? 

message: CSD A7 requires that the article not assert the subjects notability.  This article clearly asserts notability.  The issue of whether that notability is sufficient is for an AfD.  -Selket Talk 22:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can nominate it, if you see fit. I'm pretty apathetic at the moment. LiteralKa (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for speedy deletion
Talk:SecureLog

message: This "algorithm" is apparently a commercial product. I just added an  tag. It isn't as bad as many cruder forms of advertising, but really says almost nothing about the "algorithm" other than listing numerous reasons (including faintly menacing legal ones) why the reader should be paying for these services. In fact, description of the "algorithm" itself is so vague that it is difficult to even say if it is, in fact, an algorithm!
To clean this up to the usual Cryptography Portal standards, someone familiar with this algorithm needs to give a technical description, and preferably the ways it differs from other digital notary, trusted timestamping or secure logging protocols. Reasons why someone would want to use such a thing should best be left in those main articles. -- Securiger (talk) 08:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert tag
Talk:Mist net

message: An image used in this article, , has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Fastily for the following reason: No license since 29 April 2011
;What should I do?
You can remove the code for this image from the article text (which can look messy), however a different bot may already have done so. You could also try to search for new images to replace the one deleted. If you think the deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 00:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Brown Thrasher stuck in a mistnet.png Deleted

message: Hello all,
As part of a class project my group and I are submitting changes/additions to the mist net page. I will be adding a section on specific uses and the advantages of using mist nets to include the following:
•	Mark-recapture for population sampling
•	Humane capture and relocation of small birds or bats in industrial areas, such as malls, warehouses, plant nurseries, etc.
•	Tagging and tracking
•	Testing the health of bird or bat species
The other members will be commenting with their suggested additions.
-Carla Ramirez  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildlifegroup3 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: "Sometimes, a particular species can appear in the mist net often because they are easy to catch or the species enjoys being caught for various reasons such as protection or an easy way to catch prey."
I do not understand this sentence. Arcandam (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird sentence
Talk:LL Cool J discography

message: I'm not sure how the discographies on Wikipedia are created.  At any rate, leaving out LL's first release, 1984's 12" single "I Need A Beat,"  is a glaring omission.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Need_a_Beat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djjd222 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is "I Need A Beat"? 