Template talk:Transliteration

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Noting that there is not a consensus to delete the redirect created as a result of the move. That would require an additional discussion at WP:RfD. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 20:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Transl →  – This template "transliterates" the input text. So, the new title is more proper and complete than simply transl. Also, the part transl is common for both the words translation and transliteration. As such, this template should be moved to  to provide natural disambiguation against Template:Translation. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 19:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 February 2022 

message: Can the Transliteration template be modified to support Private-use language tags? I have been expanding Wikipedia's coverage of ancient history, and I am finding myself needing for the transliteration template to render Private-use language tags, but it seems that it does not currently do so.
Seeing as the expansion of Wikipedia's ancient history coverage would inevitably make it a necessity, can I request for the Transliteration template to be modified so that it can render Private-use language tags? Antiquistik (talk) 12:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private-use language tags  

message: Hi @Jonesey95, why did you revert me?  “Source text to be transliterated,” foreign-script text like барахло, is never to be entered into this template. Only its corresponding Latin-alphabet target transliteration, like barakhlo.  —Michael Z. 02:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. I was suspicious of the edit, because the documentation had been stable for a while, and I misread the documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  —Michael Z. 12:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Withdrawn; primary given reason for a preference mooted by ensuring AWB doesn't autoreplace  with . Thanks, everyone! (non-admin closure) Remsense诉 06:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:Transliteration →  – The extra eration really contributes to a readability issue when there are lists, tables, or any preponderance of this template in an article—I get that  is undesirably ambiguous, but frankly: the shorter the better. I would even prefer  if other people will let me get away with it.
No one in the 2022 move discussion mentioned an explicit issue with , so hopefully folks would be okay with it now. Remsense诉 18:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 April 2024 

message: Are there style guidelines for the use of both  and  in conjunction with ? 
E.g., " (),  () - , no way" -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style guidelines for multiple templates