Talk:HyperTalk

message: To whoever added the 'off-side-rule' mention: I've removed that again. HyperTalk has an auto-indent feature, that's all. The actual meaning of the code was determined by actual tokens, like 'then' and 'end if'. It's like Pascal with its BEGIN and END blocks in that regard. Whitespace has no real meaning in HyperTalk (beyond its presence and absence), and was automatically redone by the editor at the start of a line. Uliwitness (talk) 12:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed

message: I am doubtful about mention of HyperScript. I found http://hyperscript.net, which describes it as a language with C-like syntax. It has line-end semicolons and all that. Can whoever added that clarify why they think this language was in any way related to HyperTalk? Uliwitness (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove HyperScript

message: Since the page for xTalk is stubbed, and duplicates information found on the page for HyperTalk, may I suggest merging xTalk into HyperTalk? Ginnrelay (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge xTalk into HyperTalk

message: Someone edited the syntax examples to no longer be valid HyperTalk. There were now excess "the value of" function calls in front of every object descriptor (even though that *evaluates* the field contents as HyperTalk expressions, so a field containing "5 * 4" would return "20", not the string "5 * 4") and added invalid "the" articles in front of non-ordinal object descriptors. I just verified in HyperCard 2.4 running under OS 9 in SheepShaver that you can't say "the card field 1" and the like. It gives the error message "Can't Understand this." Uliwitness (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong syntax

message: I'm not too sure about the use of the term "collection" in the latest edits for this article. It seems like an overly clever way of describing things in a recursive fashion that (at least in HyperCard proper) were not recursive. And finally, the concept of iterators in the traditional meaning of the word doesn't exist in HyperTalk, so this is foreign terminology applied in a way that doesn't ring true to me. Can the original author maybe elaborate on their thinking behind this phrasing? Uliwitness (talk) 05:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Collection Proliferation

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on HyperTalk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040401125733/http://www.redstonesoftware.com/usingeggplant.html to http://www.redstonesoftware.com/usingeggplant.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721232234/http://pantechnicon.runrev.info/pmwiki.php?n=HyperCard.HomePage to http://pantechnicon.runrev.info/pmwiki.php?n=HyperCard.HomePage
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Removed the flag after editing the article to incorporate more formal language. Feel free to point out (or make) any additional changes. MaitiuStiofan (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formality/tone flag removed