Talk:Medal of Honor: Airborne

message: The weapons section doesn';t state if you lose your weapon's experience/upgrades if you dump it in the field.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.33.21 (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You keep your upgrades, even if you pick up a different weapon. Geekboy72 22:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many users have reported many installation issues with Medal of Honor: Airborne such as:
1/ Protection Technique Restarting System Upon Disc Insertion:
From EA game forum:
"When  the DVD disc is put  in the tray and if it starts auto run, it checks for imaging tools and if it detects anything it will restart your system. So before you insert the DVD make sure to disable any program that might be running that will cause this to happen."
2/ AGEIA PHYSICX  version PROBLEM:
AGEIA Physicx driver is designed by developer to be installed BEFORE the game is.
They design the installer in such a way that the game won't install if user has a newer version of the AGEIA driver than the one provided on the DVD disc.
(mostly from the newer NVIDIA display and CUDA Physicx package)
The installer will  just quit without letting consumers know what the problem is and many people have been kept in the dark for why their games have not been installed (consumers go on assuming DVD disc corruption, thus  exchanging discs in stores, or copying the whole disc content to hard drive etc...)
Why do the developers have to assume that their version of AGEIA Physicx is the ultimate and last version?
Why don't they give consumers the choice to install the game first and then pop up a notice/warning informing consumers to install/upgrade/degrade their AGEIA driver?
Why don't their apply the routine that most games do to nowadays with Directx:
"Installer has detected that you have a newer version of Directx Installed, therefore there is no need to install it now" etc...
3/ Windows Firewall:
There is a specific error occurring where MOHA
installation rolls back right at the end. If you're having
that error, follow the instructions below:
 PLEASE NOTE: During the install, the installer
 attempts to add MOHA to the firewall exception list
 regardless if the firewall is enabled or not. This
 depends on the firewall service being available to
 windows. This service is enabled by default on XP and
 continues to run, even if the user sets the firewall
 status to off. If it is disabled completely in the
 services list, then we see the failure.
 To enable the service: Start Menu - run -
 "services. msc"
 The name of the service is "Windows Firewall/Internet
 Connection Sharing (ICS)"
 To start it, right click on the service name and
 click "Start" in the menu. Then proceed to install
 the game normally.
 If you are unable to start the "Windows
 Firewall/Internet Connection Sharing (ICS)", ensure
 these services which it depends on are started,
 checking in this order:
 - Remote Procedure Call (RPC) (The next two depend on
 this service)
 - Network Connections
 - Windows Management Instrumentation"
Again why do they assume that all people in the world will enable their Windows Firewall?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.249.74 (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Installation Problem

message: All the stuff recently added is a cut and paste from many web sites. See this google search:  Thunderbrand 19:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: I added that. I've done research on the game and EA says it is considering adding it. 65.255.130.104 02:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free-Roaming Segment 

message: I have re-edited the page in a way I think everyone will be happy with until EA officially comments on this issue. I've taken steps to try and get an official response. Please read it thoroughly, don't just erase it outright.
:Firstly, please sign all comments. Secondly, please add proper formal wikipedia referencing to all uncitated comments. According to the official website, and the creators of the game itself, EA, Medal of Honor: Airborne will only be released in 2007 on the XBOX 360, PlayStation 3 and PC. Without conformation from a first party source, the comments about the Wii do not belong on the wikipedia article. Medal of Honor: Airborne will not be released on a console that is incapable to support its engine. Therefore, a slimmed down engine was used to produce Medal of Honor: Vanguard. I have removed mention of the Wii on the article. Unless EA officially state that the game is comming to the Wii please do not in future add it again. Thanks. Stickeylabel 07:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The Wii is not capable of running the Unreal 3 engine; therefore any Airborne game on the Wii would be substantially different to the version on the PC, 360 and PS3. It doesn’t make sense to me that EA would develop the same game for such different hardware platforms.  HalHal 17:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-edit

message: In the article that mentions the Unreal Engine, there is evidence of a second playable character. Perhaps we can incorporate that into the article? Knight45 22:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don't include such information, unless there is clear evidence that the developers intended for a second playable character. As far as can be told, there is only one character, so such information should not be included at present. GUtt01 (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Playable Character

message: Calling the graphics/game engine the "Source engine" makes it sound like a Source engine game. It should be renamed to avoid confusion. HertzaHaeon 15:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I used the same article template as featured articles such as Half Life 2 and that's where it came from, I'm not too great on the technical stuff :-) --Joowwww 09:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is already renamed to game engine. --SkyWalker 13:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source engine? 

message: I have proposed that the articles Boyd Travers and Medal of Honor: Airborne Soundtrack be merged back into this article. Both articles have been simply copy/pasted out of the main article and are not really notable as per WP:Notability, as they do not provide real-world context, sourced analyses, or details of impact or historical significance. Furthermore they have not been wikified and do not conform to WP:MOS, and contain little or no references as per WP:Attribution. --Konasr 13:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge Boyd Travers but not the soundtrack. The article of the soundtrack is perfectly fine. I really think that merges are sick. It really spoils wikipedia and the content of it.--SkyWalker 13:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Merge them both; Boyd Travers isn't notable, the information on the soundtrack article can be put into a section on the Airborne article, however if a lot more information about the soundtrack is provided then it could be worthy of its own article. --Joowwww 13:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The soundtrack article is perfectly fine. I created for two reasons 1). To cut down the size of the main article. The 2nd) reason is for the article to join this club . What sort of notable this soundtrack needs?. Is this enough?. What sort of more info do you want to add in soundtrack?. There is already more info avaliable in that article. --SkyWalker 13:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, I've added a basic overview to the old section while saving specifics for the article. --Joowwww 19:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I was quite surprised when I read this article and found that it's not even a Good Article. I think that with a bit of expansion it could be a Featured Article. In the meantime, this article is certainly worthy of a good article. --Simpsons fan 66 07:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nominated for GA. --Simpsons fan 66 02:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA/FA 

message: The article states that the finale takes place during Operation Varsity, while the PC version's last level is actually Der Flakturm. Would it be possible to get the article unprotected so I can add this info? 144.135.138.40 06:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The mission title is "Der Flaktrum", but it still takes place within the real-life Operation Varsity campaign, even though MOHA's mission is a fictional event. --Scottie_theNerd 07:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible that Der Flakturm can be mentioned? It is a little misleading Bizzmag (talk) 15:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

text:  There is no need to make mention of mission titles within the plot summary of the game. All versions of the game will include the same missions; while each one is earmarked by an operation linked to it, the final mission is a part of Operation Varsity (if only a fictional event). GUtt01 (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finale 

message: I'm confused about how many players can play together online. A website ad I think said 32 for the PS3. Is this right?--Playstationdude 13:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: multiplayer

message: I think the plot section needs to be imrpoved more upon, as currently, it only generally mentions each of the battles Travers take part in, and I also think the historical inaccuracies ought to be put in a separate section. 81.235.171.21 (talk) 13:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned it a little bit. --Krzyzowiec (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: The section of this article that discusses the weapon upgrades that can be unlocked, and later, the entire "controversies" section, are written in a style of wording that is biased against the game. In the upgrades section, the realism of the game is attacked. In the "controversies" section, the part of that text that dicsusses the Nazi heavy soldier also appears to be biased against the game. In fact, there's no reason for the "controversies" section to exist, because there's no controversy. A more appropriate title for the section would be "innacuracies", as the errors mentioned are technical and historical innacuracies, and the section title should reflect as much. Dreadnaught (talk) 22:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Section title has been changed from "controversies" to "historical innacuracies" (though it is a same thing...). Section controversies aka historical innacuracies is really needed because we have a couple of serious situations which took place in the game and weren't in real life. Some people "educate" themselvs based on the computer games... "POV" tag is not needed. --Krzyzowiec (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. I used the POV tag because there really weren't any other tags that were appropriate, and the point of view did in fact appear to be biased against the game. 65.54.154.153 (talk) 02:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This section seems entirely unnecessary, and there are certainly weasel words present in the section. I'm going to try and clean it up, but I think it best to remove the section entirely. IMWeazel (talk) 03:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Truth be told, if there were historical inaccuracies in this game, the question would be if they were intentional or not. If the former, its likely that EA Los Angeles created fictional elements into the game, in which case there is no need to make a section to comment on this. In addition, anything that is not neutral in tone, such as being biased against this game, is not helpful or constructive for articles made for Wikipedia. GUtt01 (talk) 19:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field includes "PC".  I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the  Vgclegend template.  For example, if Medal of Honor: Airborne only runs on MS-DOS, then Medal of Honor: Airborne's Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.
ProResearcher (talk) 00:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: Uh, no. Medal of Honor: Heroes 2 is supposed to be the last WW2 game in the MOH series. It came out a few months after Airborne. 64.228.214.125 (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last WW2 Game In MOH Series? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Medal of Honor: Airborne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071228055304/http://www.ea.com:80/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=24 to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=24
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Medal of Honor: Airborne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071027174106/http://planetmedalofhonor.gamespy.com:80/fullstory.php?id=124716 to http://planetmedalofhonor.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=124716
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071228055252/http://www.ea.com:80/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=1 to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071228055309/http://www.ea.com:80/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=27 to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=27
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071011013527/http://www.ea.com:80/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=35 to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=35
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071103005328/http://www.ea.com:80/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=36 to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=36
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071228055259/http://www.ea.com:80/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=20 to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/news.jsp?id=20
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Medal of Honor: Airborne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111181741/http://www.vgmonline.net/reviews/simonelchlepp/medalhonorairborne.shtml to http://www.vgmonline.net/reviews/simonelchlepp/medalhonorairborne.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Medal of Honor: Airborne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150905202631/http://www.actiontrip.com/reviews/medal-of-honor-allied-assault.phtml to http://www.actiontrip.com/reviews/medal-of-honor-allied-assault.phtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011005030/http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/ to http://www.ea.com/moh/airborne/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)