lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Beijing

message: What is the middle section, and why is it alphabetized separately from the top section? Badagnani 05:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections?

message: There's a fuzzy line between Culture and sights and Visitor attractions. Thoughts?
As for education group, I think it's fine to include several of the top universities. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I like your work on culture/visitor attaractions. But, the universites I think should remain. After all, a navbox is for quick links to hop around. List of uni... is the complete list, but a selection of some universities in the navbox serve visitors, I think. Besides, a group with a single items looks funny, and leaves unoccupied white space. Nothing wrong with a few items there. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:54, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope and groups
Talk:The Pick

message: I'm removing the quotes, because they belong on Wikiquote, not Wikipedia.N734LQ 05:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gabriel Loire

message: * I created this Article on June 23, 2007, as the subject certainly meets Wikipedia: Notability requirements. Some of the biographical information was, in part, translated from fr-wiki.JGHowes talk -  05:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Abubakar Gumi

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 02:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I call you attention on mispelling his name, his correct name is Ahmad Mahmud not Ahmad Mahmoud, please take note of that. Anasskoko 21:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of Name
Talk:Delaine Eastin

message: I've tweaked some sources, removed some things that seem to be slanted, and added new content from a few days ago. The POV tag is also over 3 years old with no other comments, so I'm going to remove it.  Norramic (talk) 07:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated sources. 

message: RE: this line: 
In November 2016, Eastin announced that she intends to be a candidate for Governor of California in the 2018 race.[4]
I'm wanting to add a link to her campaign site, delaineeastin.com.  Is that appropriate?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwayne (talk • contribs) 05:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous comment. 

message: There has been much recent editing, but there have been no sources for all this information. Where is it all coming from? Questioningly, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources.
File talk:Knockedupmp.jpg

message: The image is the same image as the recently uploaded one and from the same source. The only difference is the size, and I uploaded it specifically in a smaller size to fall under the requirements of fair use. The new images is significantly larger than this one. The deciding admin should take a look at the new one and determine if that one should be deleted instead. --Nehrams2020 05:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, the image is only used in the infobox at 200px, so the image doesn't need to be too big anyways, and at that size the quality difference isn't noticeable. --Nehrams2020 05:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep
Talk:Tomato juice

message: why no mention that 90% of the time we drink this in the UK we add worcestershire sauce? The article is so US centred.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7891:E900:35E8:5FE3:440C:DF2C (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: worcester sauce

message: "For unknown reasons, Tomato juice is observed to be disproportionately popular among airline passengers."
This is so true! Why is that? It's about the only place where you see people drink tomato juice. So strange.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.48.83 (talk) 10:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is probably why: http://www.ibp.fraunhofer.de/en/Press/Research_in_focus/Archives/A_feast_for_research.jsp Ostracon (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The authors suggest this might be beneficial to diabetes sufferers.
Googled "tomato juice diabetes" and results seemed to mention type 2 diabetes only, perhaps add that as a clarification. --88.195.100.220 (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tomato juice and diabetes 

message: It appears that Tomato Juice is actually "Tomato Juice", a preparation of tomatoes. . Actual tomato juice is what one gets when cutting or slicing them, a thin, watery liquid not much resembling Tomato Juice. . The tomato does not have an inedible rind, so they can not be treated like, say, citrus fruits. . Hence we wind up with thinned tomato puree and call it, nonsensically, "Tomato Juice" -- Soooooooo complicated ! ! . As a drink, I find it too thick, pour it over ice and thin it yet further.  76.101.39.88 (talk) 22:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition of Tomato Juice
Talk:Clay Matthews Sr.

message: The stub article states that his son, Clay Matthews, Jr., was a professional bowler.  Is that true?  Regardless, isn't he better known as a former professional football player with the Atlanta Falcons?  Vereverde (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son, Clay Matthews, Jr. 
Talk:Eastern Arizona College

message: Is this still in existence? This is (or was) in the beautiful, historic Gila Pueblo buildings that Harold Gladwin built in the 1930s? --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  EAC campus in Globe?
Talk:LNG storage tank

message: The last sentence of the first paragraph directly contradicts the last paragraph. It states that tanks are roughly 250,000 meters cubed, or 250 million liters. The last paragraph state's the world's largest tank is 200 million liters. 50.197.195.137 (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Volume Contradictions
Talk:Wildcatter

message: A speculator who risked his luck by drilling in this narrow valley shot a wildcat, had it stuffed and set it atop his derrick.
Is this talking about a single incident and one individual, or was this a customary practice?
If a single case, it should say, One speculator who... If a custom, something like It became the custom for a speculator ... to shoot a wildcat, have it stuffed...Koro Neil (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity
Template talk:Welcomec

message: Contents are copied from template welcomeg. This code also gives simplest code at new user's talk page, but here in template code may look little complex. Lara bran 06:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents 

message: You need to make the Hello! Welcome to etc. in the div parameters. -PatPeter 16:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here codes are such that code output(at new user's page) simplest possible, any complex code is done in transcluded table. Please use div parameters in this template . Thanks. Lara_bran 04:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  You need
Talk:E7 (mathematics)

message: An elegant construction of E7 is described in Adams' book on exceptional Lie algebras.  Namely, E7 as the sum of sl(8) and 
\Lambda^4(8) where the second summand is the space of alternating 4-forms in an 8-dimensional vector space.  The sl(8) piece is a subalgebra.  To define the bracket on the second piece as well as between the two pieces, there are elegant short formulas using natural pairings.  Somebody should add this description. Katzmik 11:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi I think that "E7 appears as a part of the gauge group of one the (unstable and non-supersymmetric) versions of the heterotic string." needs an of, as in "E7 appears as a part of the gauge group of one of the (unstable and non-supersymmetric) versions of the heterotic string." But it could just be that I'm not following the logic. ϢereSpielChequers 22:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:List of TVB series (2008)

message: I'd just like to inform all editors of the "List of TVB pages", that the top ten ratings are determined by their HIGHEST AVERAGE WEEKLY POINTS, NOT by their average total of average weekly points.--Shaggy9872004 (talk) 10:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings
Talk:E8 lattice

message: I have added chapter "Example definition of integral octonions". This is based on Koca work from 2007 (published on archiv 2005). However my octonion multiplication is different than in Koca work. I am using octonion multiplication obtained from Cayley-Dickson construction from quaternions and sign at e7 is changed. In this way it is easier to remember for me: 123, 145, 167, 246, 275, 374, 365.
The goal of my definition is to have direct definition of octonionic E8 roots - called E8 lattice also. 
The abc triads 123, 145, 167, 346, 375, 274, 265 used for E8 roots with real part, are obtained from the above by exchanging 2 and 3 in last for triads.
The pqrs fours 1246, 1257, 1347, 1356, 2345, 2367, 4567 are obtained from above abc triads e.g. by replacing 3 by 46 and 57 in triad 123 which is concluded from 346, 357 triads.
I wonder what are the others integral octonions definitions as said "There are actually seven such maximal orders, one corresponding to each of the seven imaginary units."
Regards,
Marek Mitros, Warsaw, Poland
mim52@op.pl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marmit1 (talk • contribs) 10:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

message: At Talk:An_Exceptionally_Simple_Theory_of_Everything#Requested_move some editors apparently not acquainted with E8 in other contexts are proposing to move that article to "E8 theory", which I feel would be ambiguous and giving Garrett Lisi's theory excessive weight. Please come and help discuss this. --JWB (talk) 03:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lisi theory -> "E8 theory" 

message: The E8 Weyl group contains a subgroup of index 2, formed by the orientation-preserving symmetries, because it is generated by reflections through the hyperplanes perpendicular to the root vectors. This subgroup contains reflection through the origin because the dimension of the lattice is even. The quotient of this subgroup of index 2 by reflection through the origin is a simple group of order  696729600/4 = 174182400 .
What I have trouble verifying is that this simple group is the orthogonal group denoted O_8+(2). http://brauer.maths.qmul.ac.uk/Atlas/clas/O8p2/ has good information about that orthogonal group.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLHarden (talk • contribs) 18:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of the Weyl group 

message: There appears to be a mismatch between the description and the formula: the description says that all coordinates must be integers or all must be half-integers, but the formula allows mixed integer and half-integer coordinates. I don't know the subject or have any references, so I'm
leaving the editing to an expert.
Thanks
Virginia-American (talk) 16:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't: A^8 \cup B^8 \neq (A \cup B)^8. --JBL (talk) 16:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula
Category talk:Food science

message: I added :Category:Agriculture and it was removed saying "inapt category".  I put it back again for now, and let's talk about it here before doing any more back & forth. IMO, the category belongs -- Per :Category:Agriculture's definition, "Agriculture is the process of producing food ..." (inter alia).  "Food science" organizations and programs are often intimately related to agriculture programs. Other thoughts? --Lquilter (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  categorization
Talk:4QMMT

message: Thanks for this article, we don't have nearly enough coverage of the DSS at Wiki yet. Shalom. Alastair Haines 06:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice work!

message: any ideas where to find the actual hebrew texts of the scroll published?--108.21.120.144 (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: actual text

message: "According to Hanne von Weissenberg’s book, 4QMMT: Reevaluating the text, the function, and the meaning of the epilogue, it maintains..." This appears to refer to a book by its title, but it is hard to distinguish the actual title. Shouldn't book titles appear in italics, with the appropriate capitalization? Funfree (talk) 13:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Book title

message: "From 1959, 4QMMT was worked on alone by John Strugnell. In 1979 he co-opted Hebrew scholar Elisha Qimron on to the team to assist him in completing it." The second sentence seems to contradict the first, by implying that a team existed. Also, the definition of co-opt refers to an action performed jointly by several people, not one. "Recruit" might be more appropriate, unless the team actually did act jointly, in which case, "he" ought not to be the subject. (I'm going to change "on to" to "onto".) Also, if by the time of Qimron's arrival, the work was actually being performed by a team, "him" isn't appropriate, either. Funfree (talk) 14:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparent contradiction
Talk:Long-tailed chinchilla

message: NCBI Taxon Browser is listing Molina, not Bennett (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Info&id=34839&lvl=3&p=mapview&p=has_linkout&p=blast_url&p=genome_blast&lin=f&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock)
Trurl66 07:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Woods and Kilpatrick (2005) in Mammal Species of the World Vol. 3 say: "Osgood (1941) critically reviewed the early descriptions of chinchillas and suggested that Molina's (1782) Mus laniger was a composite based on no known specimens.  Bennett (1829) used Chinchilla lanigera, derived from Molina's Mus laniger, without stating that the animal described is the same as that described by Molina (1782)."  --Aranae 20:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the Chinchilla lanigera authority 

message: In reply to this: 
There is a vast difference between them. Please, at the very least, Google them before making such false claims. The wild Chinchilla lanigera species is much smaller than it's domesticated counterpart and it's form has quite a bit of variation. In fact, the wild version looks more like a mouse or a chipmunk than it does a domestic chinchilla. The article that is specifically about the wild Chinchilla lanigera should strictly contain pictures of the wild Chinchilla lanigera. I don't think there would be a problem with a section within the article that talks about the domesticated version a bit and has a picture of a domesticated chinchilla there, but the pictures should predominately be composed of wild chinchillas only and, if they aren't, they should be labeled as such. Otherwise, you're giving people the false impression that the few that are romping around in the wild look just like the fuzzballs in their living room, which they don't. --74.137.227.117 18:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you cite the fact that there are domesticated and wild varients of Chinchilla chinchilla?, and experts call one "dometic(ated)" animal? If so, should this article be split?  If the artical can't be split, can a strong devision be created with the article sections to make this clear?  Chrisrus (talk) 03:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild vs. domesticated Chinchilla 

message: This is key to improving the article. I was wondering if the domesticated chinchilla is a subspecies of C. lanigera. 76.102.7.183 (talk) 20:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important to differentiate in the article 

message: 2601:647:CB02:5034:A9D9:C859:43B3:99D4 (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's clearly of lower quality than the current one. El_C 21:21, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  If not in the box, it needs to be added somewhere to the article as the only picture of a wild chinchilla. 2601:647:CB02:5034:A9D9:C859:43B3:99D4 (talk) 21:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is wrong with this image?
Talk:Edge contraction

message: This page should clarify the effect of contracting in the presence
of loops and multiple edges.  'Vertex contraction' is more commonly called
'vertex identification'. I will make these changes
Luis Goddyn (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some modifications 

message: :In graph theory, an edge contraction is an operation which removes an edge from a graph while simultaneously merging together the two vertices it used to connect. All other edges incident to either of the two vertices become incident to the single merged vertex. More generally, one can contract a set of edges by contracting each of them individually in any order. An edge contraction may result in a graph with loops or multiple edges, which are sometimes deleted (as in the diagram) in order to keep within the class of simple graphs. Edge contraction is a fundamental operation in the theory of graph minors.
Loops can't result if the edge is removed before merging the two vertices. McKay (talk) 06:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually they can. I can see two possible ways to get loops. If you start with a multgraph and contract on one of the multiedges you'll get a loop (I didn't see any restriction to simple graphs in the definition) or, and I think this was what was meant, if you repeatedly contract you get loops (contract on all the edges of a spanning tree and you'll get a blossom). Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not quite right..
Talk:GLEEP

message: Is 43 years all that exceptional? HIFAR lasted for 48 - granted it was the last DIDO class to close. Andrewa 07:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: lifespan

message: Doesn't "gleep" also mean steal? Kart2401real (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't "gleep" mean steal?
Talk:Edge and vertex spaces

message: *The incidence matrix H for a graph G defines a linear transformation H:\mathcal{E}(G) \to \mathcal{V}(G) between the edge space and the vertex space of G.
**I think with the very general definition in the beginning of the article it is not possible to give such a specific statement. --Abdull (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Total physical response

message: The method relies on the assumption that when learning a second or additional language, that language is internalized through a process of codebreaking similar to first language development and that the process allows for a long period of listening and developing comprehension prior to production. Students respond to commands that require physical movement.
I agree with the basic gist of these sentences, but I think the details make them a bit misleading. Using the word "assumption" makes it seem like this is just a guess on the part of James Asher, whereas in reality it has been backed up by numerous studies, and agrees with the ideas of Stephen Krashen, which are backed up by even more studies. And I think the use of the word "codebreaking" is not a good idea, as it makes it sound like learning with TPR is really hard, when in fact it is the opposite. In his book "Learning Another Language Through Actions" (I lent it to a friend so I can't check the page numbers) Asher likens grammar-based learning methods to code-breaking because they are so hard, and says that this sort of study vary rarely leads to real langauge acquisition. TPR, on the other hand, is instantly understood - the actions the instructor performs immediately makes the meaning clear. I also think Asher's idea of the right brain instantly comprehending the meaning of the words through the actions that are performed should be included. How  about this instead:
In TPR, students respond to commands in the target language that require physical movement. Beginner students are allowed a long "silent" period of responding to the instructor's commands before production of speech occurs. Production is not forced, but rather appears naturally after this period, which is usually between 10 and 20 hours of TPR instruction. The students learn the language by responding correctly to commands slightly more difficult than ones they already understand well. The method is in harmony with Stephen Krashen's theory that language is only acquired when students are presented with comprehensible input. In addition, the association of commands with physical actions ensures long-term retention of knowledge, an effect which Asher attributes to the right hemisphere of the brain instantly comprehending the commands' meanings. Asher contrasts this with the analytical understanding achieved by the left hemisphere of the brain when using grammar-based language learning methods, which is often forgotten as soon as the student leaves the classroom.
Hmm, reading this, maybe the left- and right-hemisphere talk can be moved to another section?
Gypsyjiver 07:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Is the VR game Language Lab using this method? If so, it could be included in this article. Volumemy (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other media that uses the method
Talk:Indian Rebellion of 1857

message: the use of the word " rebellion" is biased as it implies a negative connotation. It is b3tter to use the term " indian independence movement" 5.237.10.165 (talk) 14:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See the talk page archive, for every answer to your points. Slatersteven (talk) 14:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  title is biased 

message: 2409:4063:6E01:1AE3:0:0:8D49:4C13 (talk) 09:53, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The what? Slatersteven (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  S s t _Revolt of 1857
Talk:List of Ed, Edd n Eddy Season 2 episodes

message: The first episode is Home Cooked Eds and after it it's Rambling Ed. This has been mystaken in TV.com, too. I corrected it here, but I can't do the same in TV.com. --Batman tas (talk) 07:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes' titles