Talk:Ipomoea

message: I don't know how to make a comment on a page, so please forgive me if I am quite out of order here. I wanted to query the remark: "...this is not supported by scientific studies which show that although pyschoactive these compounds are not notably psychoactive or hallucinogenic." Does it mean that they are somewhat, but not very psychoactive? Otherwise it looks like a bit of a contradiction. I am not an expert, I just happened to be looking up the decorative varieties of this flower when this item caught my eye.
Again, I apologise if this is the wrong way to go about things. David Wright  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dawright12 (talk • contribs) 16:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychoactivity 

message: Please look at the following links regarding clarifying the misapprehensions between the 2 completely different species of Ipomoea tricolor and Ipomoea violacea
Ipomoea tricolor Cav = Ipomoea violacea auct.
http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?20231
Ipomoea violacea auct. = misapplied by authors
http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?406360
Ipomoea violacea L. - I recently induced the USDA to remove any reference to 'heavenly blue' from the legitimate Ipomoea violacea entry
http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?20238
The references in literature to the psychoactivity of Ipomoea violacea are almost always in reference to Ipomoea violacea as auct. and as such are not really in reference to Ipomoea violacea (L) as a distinct legitimate species from Ipomoea tricolor.
scroll down the main entry page to see Ron_Convolvulaceae's (my) comments 
http://davesgarden.com/guides/pf/go/57559/
The 2 different species are not closely related enough to form inter-specific hybrids and nowhere are any true-inter-specific hybrids between I.tricolor and I.violacea documented.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.251.196 (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Different species

message: It seems that there is an error with the caption of "Ipomoea oenthenarae" and the corresponding wikimedia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ipomoea_oenthenarae_habit.jpg. The correct name should be "Ipomoea oenotherae". This is the name used in the "list of species".
On the German page http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipomoea_oenotherae, the very same picture is found with the name "Ipomoea oenotherae". This name exsists both in IPNI and Tropicos databases. Conversely, "Ipomoea oenthenarae" is found only within wikipedia and wikpmedia pages…
I am no more than a vistor, and I am not a specialist of Ipomoea. Could somebody solve this problem?
DSW  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsw2 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The caption has been amended and the image is now at :File:Ipomoea oenotherae habit.jpg.--Melburnian (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name error? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ipomoea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528154450/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?6064 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?6064
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Iwant information about the moonflower 106.66.28.219 (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moonflower