lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lake Lothing

message: In history of Port of Lowestoft it sais that lake lothing used to be natural freshwater lake however; lake lothing was deliberately flooded with seawater to create man made Port of Lowestoft thus it was no longer a lake. It became saltwater river. Could someone please correct this mistake on lake lothing artical and give me feedback. (Timesdoors (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, well given as you wrote that part of the "artical" (interesting spelling by the way, do try and catch errors like that please), I sort of wonder a bit about this request. Some background reading suggests that historically things really aren't as simply as all that (I'm not convinced the lake should be assumed to have ever been properly freshwater for example - Suckling is worth looking at for example). I'll see if I can get a proper look at the history to allow some proper work on these articles - been awful busy cleaning up after a couple of trolls don't you know. These articles could really use some improvement rather than the sorts of edits that have been occurring recently. It's really odd that they've been attracting the wrong sort of editor. But, if you cac cite it (the specific page citation you added to the Port page does not, fwiw, say what you said it does) or write it reasonably then go ahead. Make sure to read all the intro to editing stuff really carefully though and remember that you have a sandbox to try things out in before you try them out on real pages.--Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

text: The article says it *is* a saltwater lake btw. It say nothing about what it was. Given it crosses over with the Port article, I'd not be that bothered about adding too much more here if I were you.Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Honda motorcycles

message: This timeline seems to be missing the VFR800F. Aaron.axvig (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFR800F 

message: Can anyone fix the stray blank lines showing when the template is collapsed, I could not work out how to do it. Cheers Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 16:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stray blank lines

message: I don't know how to expand it, but is there any reason the timeline doesn't include years prior to 1990?
I don't think it would be hard to figure out all of the production models for years from the 60s through the 80s and it would be really nice to be able to have a more inclusive timeline.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon1234567 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured out how to create a new template and created another to cover Honda street motorcycles of the 1980s.  I added links so teh two templates point to each other.  I didn't try to divide the models into categories, so that would be a good next step.  The years of models could definitely use some peer review as well -- most of the year data is taken from Wikipedia articles.  I also think it would be a good idea to create an additional template or two to cover the 1960s and 1970s.  Jon1234567 (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decades before the 90s? 

message: I started expanding to 2011: Template talk:Honda motorcycles/Workpage --Dbratland (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 

message: This table now spans 23 years. Should the 1990s be split off like the 1970s and 1980s templates? I think yes. --Biker Biker (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it more interesting to see the longer span? Any way, I think we could add signs like "<<" and ">>" in a row when production is continued from or into a next decade (or template). -DePiep (talk) 22:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to split off 90's? 

message: Missing Honda Valkyrie. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I miss mine ;-). -DePiep (talk) 23:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you did there. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Honda Valkyrie 

message: Missing Honda VTX.  Both the 1300 and the 1800  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.61.165.218 (talk) 13:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing VTX line
Talk:Dopaminergic

message: This section needs rewriting to be more accessible to the pedestrian reader.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1000Faces (talk • contribs) 01:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tolcapone 

message: I've heard that there are only 4 nuclei within the brain that are dopaminergic.  Can you confirm and include this in the article? --1000Faces 01:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sites 

message: Any arguments for or against the "Main article: Dopamine" link at the top of this page? I can't decide whether it's a good idea. Exercisephys (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main article: Dopamine 

message: This whole page is a mess of needless acronyms and synonyms. I'll hopefully remember to getting around to fixing it when it isn't so late, but I thought I'd post this here as a reminder to myself and others. Exercisephys (talk) 04:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acryonyms 

message: Disulfiram is not an anti-craving agent, because it doesn't decrease craving for alcohol or any other drug. It prevents or deters a person from consuming alcohol, because it leads to disulfiram alcohol reaction, if alcohol is consumed along with disulfiram. Normally, alcohol is converted to acetaldehyde. Acetaldehyde is further converted to Acetyl CoA by aldehyde dehydrogenase. The above reaction occurs, because disulfiram blocks the enzyme aldehyde  dehydrogenase and leads to accumulation of acetaldehde in the body.  Krampe, Henning; Stawicki, Sabina; Wagner, Thilo; Bartels, Claudia; Aust, Carlotta; Ruther, Eckart; Poser, Wolfgang; Ehrenreich, Hannelore (2006). "Follow-up of 180 Alcoholic Patients for up to 7 Years After Outpatient Treatment: Impact of Alcohol Deterrents on Outcome". Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 30 (1): 86–95. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00013.x. . 
Disulfiram may be useful as a deterrent drug for cocaine and other dopaminergic drugs by blocking the enzyme dopamine-β- hydroxylase. The excess dopamine results in increased anxiety, higher blood pressure, restlessness, and other unpleasant symptoms. Fear of having this symptoms prevents or deters a person from consuming cocaine or similar drug. Mukeshsamani (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disulfiram
Talk:Worldwide Governance Indicators

message: I added a neutrality tag to the article because of the claims that the indicators reinforce the experiences and observations of reform-minded individuals in government, civil society, and the private sector, that good governance is key for development and Their growing recognition of the link between good governance and successful development has stimulated demand for monitoring the quality of governance.  These sorts of claims represent points of view - I don't doubt that they are significant points of view that should be included - but we should be attributing them to the groups and movements that assert them not simply stating them as fact.  Good sources for these claims would let us do that. -- SiobhanHansa 02:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV tag 

message: Tha map is very outdated. The 2010 version is available
--Rejedef (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: You can't see what color Israel is marked with on the map. It's true for some other countries as well. 213.109.230.96 (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel 

message: There are only 193 (depends on Azawad 194) countries in the world.. Why do you write that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.110.187 (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  200 countries? 

message: Dr. Shah has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Shah has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Ivanyna, Maksym & Shah, Anwar, 2010. "Citizen-centric governance indicators : measuring and monitoring governance by listening to the people and not the interest groups," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5181, The World Bank.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 02:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Shah's comment on this article
Talk:The Natural History (band)

message: *The Natural History page was marked for speedy delete before any of the biography was posted. That has been corrected now, and this page should be notable enough to stay on Wikipedia.
*The picture was marked for speedy delete, but fair-use rational has been posted and the picture is up to standards (Fulmerg 18:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Need an admin to move this to The Natural History. agahnim 20:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Need an admin to move
Talk:Guided Mouse-ille

message: Could the title also be a reference to the Road Runner cartoon Guided Muscle; which was produced by Jones when he was still at Warner Bros.?  WAVY 10 00:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Guided Muscle]] Reference?

message: Whoever entered this statement into the article...
:"When the smoke clears, the time has reversed itself to the Stone Age because of Jerry's invention of the highly explosive liquid."
...has completely missed the point.  The experimental bomb being brewed up by Tom is clearly indicated by the notes shown on the chalkboard (E... = mc²) to be a nuclear bomb.  There is a famous quote by Einstein:
“I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.”
In the Vietnam era, Curtis LeMay echoed this sentiment:
"they've got to draw in their horns and stop their aggression, or we're going to bomb them back into the Stone Age."
So the final scene of this cartoon has absolutely nothing to do with time travel.  Their timeline has continued into their future where they've bombed themselves into the Stone Age.  I will fix the misguided assertion. --Tdadamemd19 (talk) 09:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending depicts World War 3
Talk:Kate Spade & Company

message: Herbert Gallen was the CEO for Ellen Tracy for five decades, and the company -- now owned by Claiborne -- isn't even represented well in the article. Expand Ellen Tracy into a new section.
Ellen Tracy is no longer owned by Liz Claiborne Inc. The link between companies is too insubstantial. They should each have their own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.219.124 (talk) 16:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Herbert Gallen]], create section on Ellen Tracy 

message: I work for Rubenstein and Liz Claiborne, Inc. is a client of ours. To mitigate any potential conflict of interest, I corrected only factual misinformation about the line designed by Isaac Mizrahi, and added appropriate citations. If there are any questions/concerns to my actions, please discuss on my talk page. // Brycetom (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: For a school report i did her and she was just so much fun to learn about! Think about learning aboyt her she is really fun and awesome!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.208.8 (talk) 23:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Maginze

message: This article is in need of major factual revisions. Not only does the company not own the partnered brands Mexx, DKNY and Dana Buchman anymore, it does own the Liz Claiborne brand and as of today has changed its name to Fifth & Pacific Companies. All of the information related to these transactions can be found on the company's IR website and in its filing with the SEC on that agency's website.
Nick (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions for recent transactions 

message: Looking to add two execs that have been with the company for nearly 9 years.  Okay to post this: "Deborah Lloyd joined kate spade new york in 2007 and leads the creative aspects of the brand as president and chief creative officer.  Craig A. Leavitt, currently chief executive officer, joined shortly thereafter to lead the development of all business aspects." 
citations
Karimzadeh, Marc (4 February 2013) “Deborah Lloyd Taps Kate Spade’s DNA” Women’s Wear Daily 
Lockwood, Lisa (3 February 2014) "Kate Spade Gears Up for Growth" Women’s Wear Daily
BonnieNYC2015 (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leadership 
Talk:Stolac

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
**Oppose It is frequently necessary to split the articles for the town and the municipality.  It is better to start off with the division, rather than try to separate them later after the articles have become confusing. Not that a good article about a municipality can't have a section about the town in it, but such ideal articles seldom stay that way and editors crowd the town into the lead at the expense of the municipality until the result is a unhelpful jumble. --Bejnar (talk) 04:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Vidoski has had a proposed merger tag since September 2014 proposing a merger to this page, but this page was not similarly tagged.  Vidoski is a one-line unfererenced stub article.  I have placed a tag on this page and re-dated the tag at Vidoski to May 2017.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal - Vidoski
Talk:Caroline Moorehead

message: Given that there is a separate page devoted to her, I have taken it upon myself to cut down the detailed description on this page, which is only of tangential relevance to Caroline Moorehead herself. Hope that's OK.
45ossington (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Martha Gellhorn
Talk:Don Kirsch

message: Since also HOF member for national HOF I bumped up to high. Aboutmovies 16:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: High
Talk:Milan Kymlicka

message: Information referring to Milan Kymlicka's biography has been extracted from the Encyclopedia of Music in Canada (http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=U1ARTU0001901) and cross-referenced with his biography on the Internet Movie Database (http://imdb.com/name/nm0477426/). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SeguraN001 (talk • contribs).
:Both of the external links went nowhere when I placed the db template. I've replaced them with the links above and removed the db template. However, the body of the article still needs to make an assertion of notability; the links by themselves are not sufficient. Thanks. –Sommers (Talk) 01:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Oh, Snap!

message: I created this article, like, a bajillion months ago. I gotta say, it's only gotten more ridiculous. Now, I know not everyone is clambering to edit the article about an outdated urban slang expression, but all I ask is that the people that do edit this article do not contribute to the juvenile antics of, well, myself.
Let's take a look at the first line, penned by yours truly, claiming the phrase "Oh, Snap!" was "coined by American Rap superstar Biz Markie in his hit single 'Just a Friend'." His country of origin is unimportant, and the words "superstar" and "hit single" aren't NPOV or whatever you kids call it these days. And Peter Stormare's use of the word in a car commercial isn't important enough to mention anywhere other than the trivia section. And the same goes for whoever mentioned Zoolander and That's So Raven. And the example of the phrases usage is chock full of hyperbole and slight racism (though someone chose to edit the names to Friend #1 and Friend #2, out of all the goofy things in the article). In fact, it's not that difficult to comprehend how someone uses "Oh, Snap!", so the example should just be done away with entirely.
And do I even need to tell you what's wrong with the variations?
*Oh snap! (said quickly)
*Awww snap!
*S-S-SNAP BREAKER! (my own creation, but was edited out and replaced the even more questionable...)
*OhSnap It's Sambo (Sounds like a very, very bad sitcom)
*Oh SNAP!
*Ah, Snap! ("The British variation")
*Oh...(pause)SNAP!
So, I beg you, not as the vandal I once was, but as a concerned Wikipedian, to rehual this article and make it sub-par enough for everyone to enjoy!
66.211.136.138 18:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh... SNAP!
Talk:Return on capital employed

message: I think there should be a mention of:
ROCE = net profit margin ratio \times asset turnover ratio --Citral 01:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Omission!

message: I'm no financial expert (which is why I came to this article). I was therefore dismayed to read the first sentence, which effectively says "Return on Capital Employed is return on capital employed". Halsteadk (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is no-one going to sort this out?! Is this article here for the benefit of editors who already know their stuff, or readers who want to learn something? Halsteadk (talk) 17:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First line unhelpful
Talk:Old Man River's City project

message: The images displayed in this article are NOT images of this project. Reference link [2], as well as the physical description quoted refer to the actual Old Man River's City project design. Please update this article to source correct images. 2601:282:702:F570:B974:5D4C:36AD:F6C1 (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect photos
Talk:Marc Sumerak

message: I deleted an earlier version of this article which contained substantially the same information as the version previously deleted in AfD. That said, this version substantially expands on the earlier one, including the provision of external links that appear to be reliable sources. Note also that the AfD was last year.
Accordingly, I feel that this article is substantially different enough that CSD G4 does not apply, and enough notability is asserted that A7 does not. Accordingly, the article cannot be speedily deleted, though a second AfD is a possibility. —C.Fred (talk) 02:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison against the AfD'ed article 
Talk:Taguba Report

message: Wow...am I seriously the first person to write on the Talk page for the Taguba Report? That's a little depressing. I guess that report didn't have quite the impact it should have had. There's more info on The Ladder of Divine Ascent, for Pete's sake...
I filled out the summary section.MarkB2 01:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: A lot of people won't have a clue what an "Article 15-6" inquiry is, especially if they're not American. I don't! It needs to explain and/or link specifically. 81.159.57.7 (talk) 20:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead needs a little work 

message: Then it dooesn't say rape. Quite a difference between "rape" and "having sex with someone". In absence of either stating rape or a more verbose "forced to have sex" or some variation thereof, rape, a loaded term, does not belong in here.66.190.29.150 (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It only "implies" what you assume. And you know how to spell assume, right?66.190.29.150 (talk) 14:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  If the report doesn't say rape...

message: As far as I could tell the findnews.com link didn't provide any of the Annexes. I did some quick searching and found a nice index site at the Office of Freedom of Information website that had them all 106 up as PDF format. Added External Link --MiloKral (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction: A few of the annexes were apparently not released with all the others. Notably Annex 25 & 26 which contains the CID interviews and statements of detainees and the suspect guards that got charged along with other guards. I haven't been able to find a copy of these 2 annexes anywhere and would really like to give them a read. If anyone does know of a publicly available copy, please post a link. --MiloKral (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annexes
Talk:Ran Eliran

message: Now, is it Ran or Ron Eliran? The title of the entry reads Ran Eliran, but as soon as the article starts, it begins with Ron .... quite confusing.
Second, the mentioned YT-video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6MIvwZEjs is private. IMHO not a source or reference suitable for Wikipedia. 
Privately....: too bad, not to say disappointing I couldn't see the vid, because I'm collecting melodies suitable for Adon olam especially this kind. Will start trying now to figure it out now for myself! Anyway: inspiring!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naor (talk • contribs) 13:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

message: It's Ron "Ran" Eliran.
Please change the title if you can. Special:Contributions/68.173.109.79
* All the sources say Ran, you need to provide a very good source to show its Ron. KylieTastic (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Ron "Ran"
Talk:Free Stuff

message: The third paragraph looks like an ad, and is impertinent in any case. I have preserved it here:
"There are lots of free items available over the internet. You can find free samples of many brand name products, free electronics, free hair and beauty care items and more. There are many different internet directories that list free items that are available. One of the best is (spam removed)."
I am taking that out. Mattman00000 17:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement?
Talk:Enterobiasis

message: This statement may be getting confused with another 'fact' - approximately 30% of all appendicitis patients are found to be infested with worms, so possibly not the cause of the appendicitis, but something found at surgery Ianguy 01:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appendicitis

message: I suggest to re-arrange it so that citations lead directly to the references, rather than to the notes first and then to the references. As far as I know, notes are meant to be look footnotes, but not like normal citations. EvM-Susana (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why have Notes and References when the notes just lead to the references? 

message: Wow, I've heard before a mention of the efficacy of garlic in the management of helminthic infections. This is really worth looking into, especially garlic is food based and without (serious!) side effects. BroVic (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garlic
Talk:Cruis'n

message: ** lack proof reading
'    * In the arcade version It has Original Cruis'n USA Sounds, in the n64 It has Cruis'n USA Sounds Was
Remplaced Or Other Sounds'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.90.41.85 (talk) 13:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Cruis'n (series) →  – Series article has the same title as Cruis'n (video game). The series article should be the primary term since WP:NCVGDAB states: "If a video game series has a naming conflict solely with the first game in the series (e.g., Final Fantasy), the series page should reside at the primary name if the series possesses a minimum of 3 video game articles as well as at least one other unrelated video game or related media item." This series has 6 games (5 of them have their own articles). Mika1h (talk) 19:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 February 2017
Talk:John Moore (British musician)

message: Someone keeps making 'hilarious' alterations which are completely fictitious. I have altered it back now. 
Luke Haines 19:46, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 