lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adelaide–Crafers Highway

message: Is there a reason it's called a highway, but is in fact a freeway?  Or am I confused? Thedangerouskitchen 11:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Im with you. that section of road used to be the adelaide-crafers hwy, but is now part of the freeway...AS you enter the road, about 200m from the intersection of glen osmond road, portrush road and cross road, there are all the usual freeway signs. The only difference from the rest of the freeway is the 100km/h...TheJosh 09:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not part of the freeway, merely the road flowing onto it; the freeway has always begun at Crafers. The South Eastern Freeway originally connected to Mount Barker Road (the old route to the freeway, which the A-C Hwy travels along for a brief period near the city end—before the Devil's Elbow), was going to connect to the Hills Freeway as part of the MATS plan, and then then connected to the A-C Hwy when it replaced Mount Barker Road. The A-C Hwy is, however, a 'freeway-grade' road (equivalent to one). michael talk 09:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Devil's Elbow would make for an interesting article. I remember passing at least two horror crashes at that dreadful passing, having to call emergency services for one. --cj | talk 08:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Suzuka (manga)

message: pika Ed.
TongLi Ed. 
chuangyi Ed.
--KrebMarkt 21:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  refs dump 

message: I went ahead and downloaded the first Japanese volume of Suzuka, and found that the initial one shot appeared in Weekly Shōnen Magazine issue 51 in 2003, and then the first official chapter was in issue 12 in 2004. According to this official archive, issue 51 in 2003 was not sold in December, but on November 19, 2003. It's cited, however, as the December 3, 2003 issue, so there you go. Issue 12 in 2004 was sold on February 18, 2004 and was cited as the March 3, 2004 issue, but you already knew that as the article already states.--十八 05:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Were the issues released early?陣内Jinnai 06:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It could simply be the difference between release date and cover date... There was a project discussion on which date to use, and as I recall, cover date was decided on (but someone digging up that discussion and double-checking wouldn't hurt). 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, cover date is what was decided should be used. The cover date for the 51st issue in 2003 was December 3, 2003, so that is the date that should be used. Similarly, the cover date of issue 12 in 2004 was March 3, 2004. Usually, the cover date is just a month/date, but since this is a weekly magazine, they supply a day as well.--十八 00:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga serialization dates 

message: Right turn only vol 7 review --KrebMarkt 17:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANN right turn only
Talk:Phil Kessel

message: I have a few problems with the Internet Fame section of this Wiki page. I don't think it should be completely removed but I don't think the current way it is written is very encyclopedic. For example, is Kessel "laughing hysterically after Pierre McGuire asked him about his breath" really that important it deserves to be mentioned on his Wiki page? It seems to be written from a fans point of view and could use a comb through. I will try and do it but I am leaving this note here for discussion. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are also phrases like "turned him into an anti-hero for hockey fans" that appear to be a fans point of view and isn't backed by sources. I removed this chunk  as well as this  although maybe mentioning the tweet about being snubbed could be fully moved to the Internet Fame section. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I just noticed that Bardown actually wrote an article about how Wiki has a section called "Internet Fame": . HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

text: I would just remove the whole section, it was likely added by an over zealous fan and never removed. It is sort of WP:TRIVIAish. Anything super notable could be merged into the actual career section. -DJSasso (talk) 17:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. The only slightly possible events that aren't small non-notable hockey clips/teammates having fun is the Obama thing (just because he was the President) and the Stanley Cup hot dogs (only because it is already mentioned in the article that he brought his first Cup to Sick Kids). I will leave this here in case anyone else wants to share their opinion but if no one does within a few days I (or anyone who wants to) will remove the entire section and try to merge it with the article in an encyclopedic way. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's been a few days so I will start editing/deleting the section. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet Fame section 

message: Was Phil Kessel traded? There are reports out there but is it official. People need to stop changing he's on another team when there is nothing official yetBlackhawksfan1445 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phil Kessel trade report 

message: Almost all of the statistics in the Career Statistics section are inflated. Please Correct. 211.206.46.52 (talk) 03:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career Statistics Errors  

message: I've added a [citation needed] to the Records section, as the (now removed) reference only mentioned 981 games as the record (when Yandle was scratched).
Haven't been able to find a reference myself. 155.190.13.13 (talk) 00:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consecutive games including play-offs
Talk:Brian Willson

message: can anyone say liberalpedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.88.250.89 (talk) 07:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are the facts wrong here somewhere?  You are free to edit this entry with relevant NPOV facts.  Otherwise, you are just another whiner without making any case and/or point.  thx. Cowicide (talk) 16:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: uh

message: Just removed the word "suprisingly" from the front of "The train crew filed a law suit against Willson, requesting punitive damages for the 'humiliation, mental anguish, and physical stress' they suffered as a result of the incident." That word was a judgment, not fact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tracymmo (talk • contribs) 03:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit - minor edit
Talk:Dave Ulmer

message: you know you're not supposed to write about yourself. ???? --Kvuo 04:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

message: "Ulmer moved his remarks to the Groundspeak forums where his angry posts escalated into threatening bodily harm to other geocachers with the club he found in the Project APE cache."  Source?  That's a pretty serious charge.  Pfalstad 18:27, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This comes from first hand knowledge of the original forum posts. Contact Groundspeak who should have a record of the post in their archives.
Since you're the one making the claim, I think you should back it up by finding the forum posts.  Pfalstad 19:18, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Works for me. I learned earlier that the original post was removed during a transfer but will contact Groundspeak to see if it can be restored.
I checked the groundspeak forums and didn't find anything like that.  All I found was a post by Jeremy saying that he will not repeat what Dave said.  So there's no source for the claim that Dave was threatening anyone.  We can't put something like that in the article without sources.  Personal knowledge isn't good enough.  Pfalstad 02:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threatening behavior - sources? 

message: Per some discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon, this article has been changed to a redirect to geocaching.  The reasons are as follows:
* Few reliable sources appear to exist on the subject of this article--the article which was here plainly flunks verifiability, and the subject appears to not meet notability.
* The article as it stands is poorly written and unreferenced.  Were the article to be written using only reliable sources--it would become a stub.
* Given that whatever notability the subject has is related to geocaching, a redirect was determined a better course than outright deletion.
* If anyone objects to this course of action, feel free to revert my redirect--and then produce a well-cited article demonstrating the subject's notability per policy.  Otherwise, off to WP:AFD we shall go.
--EngineerScotty (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Morpheus (1998 video game)

message: Recommend adding after Development section:
Morpheus is being rewritten as a web game.New Landing Page for Soap Bubble Productions  The game engine is open source.Github Project Page
CaptEmulation (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . Do you have a reliable source? We need to appropriately weight our articles to what reliable sources say, and neither Github nor SoapBubble.online are reliable sources for this matter. --Izno (talk) 22:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the taking the time to look at my request.   I am only aware of soapbubble.online, https://www.facebook.com/MorpheusGame and https://collectionchamber.blogspot.com/2017/06/morpheus.html (update at end) but AFAICT after reading up on reliable sources facebook pages and blogs do not rise to the level of reliable sources.  I'll keep my ears open-- thanks. CaptEmulation (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake
Talk:Qibla/Archive 1

message: Wahhabies are responsible of the 9/11 ,In There belief it's allowed to kill any person that dont follow them .
They attack all kind of people , all people who don't follow them are there enemies .
Background On The Tribulations Of The Wahhabis
McKhan is one of them , he don't accept any point of view that don't follow his belief , if it does he will start attacking and the only thing he will do is throw fake claim .
Since he started this topic , i asked him 2 questions and till now he is running away from them .
He claimed that i stole the data to make the Qiblah in North america website ,  i asked him for proofs .... none !!
Then He claimed that the site contain hiden links .... its' clear this person dont even visited the link ... any one can visit it and see try 2 see the code source and see if it contain hidden links ...
Then after running away he said it might trouble the user ... why trouble the user ??? because it dont contain his point of view so all what he can do is attack and copy past stuff from wahhabism related site .
I dont even need to attack wahhabism any person know how deviated they are .  --Muslim sunni 12:28, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikipedia is not a place for (wahhabism ~ Terrorism ) 

message: I've protected this article due to the ongoing edit war.  All parties should be aware of the Three revert rule and should discuss their differences in a civil manner. Gamaliel 19:35, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  protection
Talk:The Adventure Company

message: "Added 'Murder on the Orient Express' since the latest on the list was dated in 2005, This game was released in 2006." Lucky Foot 14:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Came here looking for the games, I then found in this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agatha_Christie_(video_game_series)
But shouldn't they be listed here too? I didn't add them as I'm not sure why they're not listed, a comment above mine dated back in 2007 says that at least one of the games was added, but it seems to have since been removed.
--ObservantSpectator (talk) 00:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agatha Christie games
Talk:Uberrima fides

message: The term should be Uberrimae Fides, not Uberrima Fides.--Major Bonkers 04:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree.  Uberrima Fides is the singular.  Uberrimae Fidei is the plural.  Both translate to "utmost good faith" in English. Legis 14:51, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, both spellings are right, in different usages.  In the title of this article, we are speaking of "Utmost Good Faith" as the subject of the discussion.  So it is properly in the nominative case (uberrima fides).  But when we say, "An insurance policy is a contract uberrimae fidei," we are using the phrase "utmost good faith" in the genitive case: "a contract of utmost good faith".  MCTWSF 23:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uberrima or Uberrimae?

message: The principle of utmost good faith is an ideal demand for all public relation activities for politicians, goverments, coorporations and NGO's. 
In presenting a new legislation to the parliament, the government must, according to this principle present all facts and uncertainties in a balance way in order to give a basis for an informed decision.
When the legislation is going to be presented to the public, not all details can be conveyed to the public and a selection of key issiues must be made following this principle. There is nothing wrong in trying to find an optimal way of presenting you case as long as you do not voilate the principles. 
There are many examples where the utmost faith principle hasn't been followed with dramatic consequences for many people. In these cases the word spin or progaganda might be used.
There will of course be a grey zone, where it is difficult to judge if the principle of utmost good faith is voilated or not. 
"Spin" might be looked upon as the negation to "the principles of Utmost good faith".
I think there is a need to relate "spin" and "utmost good faith". I hope that someone will agree with me and will start writing about this i Wikipedia. 
  
Therfore there must be a description of the differences and there must be a link to 
[Spin]
--Kfl 21:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your proposal might make an interesting PhD thesis, but it would be original research and is therefore unsuitable for wikipedia. See Wikipedia:NOR. --Chewy m (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin and utmost good faith
Talk:Purley

message: The script has Cleese's character describing the route to the summit of Kilimanjaro:
: Well we'll be leaving on January 22nd and taking the following routes. (goes over to large map, clearly labelled Surrey) The A23s through Purleys down on the main roads near Purbrights avoiding Leatherheads and then taking the A231s entering Rottingdeans from the North. From Rottingdeans we go through Africa to Nairobis. We take the South road out of Nairobis for about twelve miles and then ask.
and Purley, London is the one lying on the A23 road.--Jerzy•t 04:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purleys
Talk:Pipe clamp

message: This could use a picture.  Many are available, but someone will have to ask one of the tool companies for the rights to use the picture in Wikipedia.  --John Nagle 04:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Really?  That can't be true...I remember tons of pictures that people have uplaoded that they released under the GFDL.  Once you buy the tool, isn't it yours?  The only thing they can copyright is the technique or manufacturing and any publicity pictures they made, but if a user takes a pictures, isn't it him or hers? - Hbdragon88 06:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure.  IF you take your own picture, that's fine.  Go for it.  --John Nagle 16:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had already uploaded one to Wikimedia commons a while ago. I put it in the article. Luigizanasi 19:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor 4

message: Linuxbeak,
I suggest rephrasing your rules for clarity:
2. In order to vote: 
:a) If you have never edited any articles relating to Serbia, Croatia, etc: You must have 50 edits.
:b) If you have: You must have 100 edits and you must have edited more than one article.
Feel free to delete my inserted comment for the sake of clarity - Richardcavell 04:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Does that mean more than one article, period? Or more than one Balkans article, hence if you have 3000 eds on 1500 various WP articles including 1 edit on "Red Star Belgrade" (the colour of their shorts, perhaps) and nothing else on Croatia or Serbia you would be ineligible? What if you have only edited on 1 such topic? Or two closely related articles on nationalism where very similar edits have been made? The distinction between editing 0, 1 and 2 or more articles needs cleared up. Deizio 02:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I notice that Linuxbeak has responded to 4 oppose votes now to criticize or complain about the vote, and none of the comments seem designed to ascertain voter eligibility under the draconian new rules.  Linuxbeak, if you don't like the way the votes are going, instead of arguing with the voters, why don't you just restart the RfA again?  Time for Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor3b, right?  -lethe talk [ +] 18:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might wish to see RfA talk, where a broader discussion about this is ongoing. Xoloz 18:55, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  bcrat campaigning 

message: How many votes is it required for you to become an admin, or percentage of votes? Just wanted to know.  CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 02:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 80% is automatic, 70+ is up to bureaucrat discretion.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Becoming an Admin 

message: I have removed these, discussion is at WPT:RFA. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linuxbeak's suggested alternate rules
Talk:Paper Lion

message: The item about being a stand-up comic has nothing to do with the subject of the article, the book Paper Lion. It may be relevant in the biographical article on Plimpton, but it does not belong here. Deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.154.249.220 (talk) 20:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stand-up comic
Talk:Francisco Arcellana

message: This article lacks a NPOV. It needs to be revised and expanded. Sources also needed. --Lendorien 13:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Aaron Peterson

message: I was patrolling the speedy deletions when I saw an article about anon-notable student called Aaron Peterson. I noted that there was a Minnesota politician of that name and rewrote the article as a stub about the politician. While doing this, another admin deleted the article. I have saved the text as it now meets WP:BIO and is completely different from the original subject of the article. Capitalistroadster 04:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nicely done, Capitalistroadster. Thanks. :-) -- PFHLai 06:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recreation of article
Talk:List of musical artists from Japan

message: I don't really see the point of this page; it's identical to List of Japanese rock bands. One of these pages should probably be deleted, but preferrably not this one - its title is more appropriate, considering the nature of some of the artists listed.
Borkorg 05:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Above Tweil suggested making this list a category, but these categories; , , already exist. As long as one of those categories are put on the band/artist's page then they automatically get put on those lists. It is a lot simpler than editing this list constantly trying to add every band/artist. So why does this list exist? Xfansd (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of this List?
Talk:Seraya Shapshal

message: Why do we spell his name according to Polish rules "Szapszal"? He was not a Pole and he lived in Poland only in 1921-39. IMHO we should move it to Seraya Shapshal - transliteration of original Karaim Серая Шапшал.
Don Alessandro 05:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Indeed, Szapszal (he wrote most of his work in Polish - therefore it is definitely better to use Polish transliteration of his name instead f English "Shapshal") has nothing to do with old-fashioned Karaite traditionalist Firkovich and CANNOT be called "his philosophical disciple". I corrected most obvious mistakes in the article (Szapszal was born in Bahcesaray, not in Chufut-Kale; he has nothing to do with the other Szapszal, the author of the letter to Falashas) and added bibliography. M. Kizilov  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.118.197 (talk) 09:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Szapszal etc. 

message: :"According to Roman Freund, Shapshal is the founder of the Crimean Karaite religion and historical doctrine of Dejudaization.[3]"
Would the editor who inserted this like to discuss here what is meant please? I think it needs more clarification.F.Tromble (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  "The turning-point of the Karaite self-perception was the beginning of the 20th c., which correlated with the leadership of S. Szapszal". See one of the resent  publications regarding this issue Dovile Troskovaite."Identity in Transition: The Case of Polish Karaites in the first half of the 20th century"//University of Klaipeda Неполканов (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The person who inserted the wording of the sentence quoted above was User:F.Trombie.--Toddy1 (talk) 23:45, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dejudaization
Talk:Queer Youth Network

message: Wiki editors have been working hard to improve this page which has become a good resource but I have been told it is being swamped with some very incorrect factual statements which are both unquoted and even legally questionable. If you are going to add to the QYA wikipedia resource please give verifiable sources as with any other article. --Spacepostman 05:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh and Updated 

message: There was a photo of some QYA members at a Section 28 protest and some others elsewhere on wikipedia but I don't know much about them and thought it would be useful to get them on here somewhere. Anyone can add to this it would be beneficial.
Yes it was a photo of some of the members with Peter Tatchell. I should be able to find the original from their site archive. So will update soon. --Spacepostman (talk) 03:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 
Talk:Tribe of Joseph

message: the only place in any version of the Bible that the "Tribe of Joseph" is mentioned is in the Book of Revelation, which was, at the time it was being considered for inclusion in the Christian canon, a huge point of contention...  Tomertalk 05:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NT mention

message: As there never was a Tribe of Joseph, I would like to move this article to the House of Joseph--Meieimatai 05:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to House of Joseph 