Talk:87th Infantry Regiment (United States)

message: My first attempt at creating a page from scratch, any assistance or critiques are highly encouraged. I consider this a work in progess. Forrest666 06:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's written in an unencyclopedic tone. You're supposed to write purely factual articles, not advertisements for the American military. Black-Velvet 11:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I understand the official translation of the motto "Vires Montesque Vincimus" is "We Conquer Power and Mountains" but I don't believe that's what it's actually saying.  First off, it don't make sense so when I researched it I got "We have the Power to Conquer Mountains" which makes sense.  Does anyone speak Latin who could properly translate the motto? 
 Solri89 (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not claim to be an expert on Latin, however I am a seminary graduate and have taught high school Latin. I, of course, defer to anyone with better knowledge of Latin than I. Since a literal translation would be "Power Mountains Conquer" perhaps the best tack would be to insert as few words as possible. So, since the original does not contain the Latin words for either "we" or "have", perhaps the best translation would be simply to rearrange as "(The) power (to) conquer mountains". However, as the motto is for an organization, I don't see any problem with prefacing it with "We have". Translating Latin is somewhat more of an art vice a science, in my opinion, since it is very free in word order and does not always include articles, pronouns, and prepositions that are usually required in English for proper sense and context. CobraDragoon (talk) 23:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Yes, but the question here concerned the true translation vice the official version; see De oppresso liber for another example of the difference between an official translation and a true translation of a motto. CobraDragoon (talk) 01:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

text: I suggest contacting the Institute of Heraldry, as I did about the issue of the rank of Army  lance corporal. (See the article and talk page for details.) CobraDragoon (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Yes, I exchanged two or three emails with them over a one or two week period, as I recall. See the next to last paragraph of my posting under  US Army Lance Corporal Rank for the summary of their response and the documentation they provided to me. CobraDragoon (talk) 22:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

text: Yes, well as I wrote previously, they have their own methodology and this motto is not the only one that people dispute; the Special Forces motto has also been a bone of contention for some people for many years. It's somewhat like the current hyper-politically correct crowd today who insist on calling everyone who disagrees with them racist when what they actually mean is prejudiced or bigoted. Many people seem to just want to make words mean whatever they want them to mean without regard to reality or correctness. But, as Forest Gump said, "Stupid is, as stupid does." CobraDragoon (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

text: Congratulations! Good job; your persistence finally bore fruit. I wish the Institute would be more responsive about changing some other things, such as their history of US Army enlisted rank insignia page. "Bravo Zulu", CobraDragoon out. CobraDragoon (talk) 14:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  87th IN Regiment motto 

message: "On 3 February 1945, the regiment deployed to Italy with the newly redesigned 10th Mountain Division and entered combat on 28 January 1945 as part of the 5th US Army."
How did they enter combat in January if they didn't deploy until February? Solri89 (talk) 21:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get these dates 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Since the 87th is the original mountain unit in the US army and they are part of a mountain division, why can’t we get back our mountain designation?  I know the division isn’t purely trained in mountain warfare anymore but we train in an extreme cold environment.  That though is besides the point.  It’s historical and should be recognized. Solri89 (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting the “Mountain” designation back 

message: The article mentions 1-4/87 but nothing of 5th Bn.  They were stationed at Ft. Clayton Panama.  After they left there in ‘96 I don’t know what happened to them. Solri89 (talk) 22:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about 5/87?