lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hemerocoetes morelandi

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Hemerocoetes pauciradiatus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Opalfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Redbanded weever

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Yellow weaver (fish)

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:New Zealand rockfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bass groper

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Hāpuku

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Shouldn't there be some mention in the article that it's also known as Groper, -the name is far more common in the South Island (NZ) at least. See; here, here, and here.219.88.68.195 (talk) 02:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groper
Talk:Pomacentridae

message: Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I added a hyperlink for Amphiprion ocellaris into your article. I am a part of a Behavioral Ecology Class (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_Program:Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Behavioral_Ecology_%28Fall_2013%29) Washington University and our assignment was to create hyperlinks from our articles to other articles as examples. Best of luck with your article!!
Gseehra123 (talk) 22:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Edit 

message: you've left an undefined ref named "VDLEF" on the page. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken ref 

message: The only thing that makes the damselfish article unique is that it excludes clownfish, but I'm not sure if that's a good reason to have two separate articles. All the info on that article could be added to Pomacentridae instead, since there's not too much on here aside from taxonomy and a bit of life history info. Perhaps the page name could also be changed to Damselfish. Geekgecko (talk) 19:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. The clownfish is a unique group that should not be 'included' in damselfish. The little bit of life history and taxonomy can potentially confuse readers. Take it in the mind of somebody who bought a damselfish. They don't realize they've been redirected to Pomacentridae when they searched 'damselfish' for care instructions. They scroll very quickly and see 'mutual relationships with anemones' while ignoring the part that say 'clownfish have' (I think I would add those; almost 100% of Pomacentridae is about damselfish not clownfish). They put a large anemone in their tank and their damselfish get stung. This would anger new fish keepers and other novice readers. For this reason I think two separate articles for damselfish, clownfish, and Pomacentridae. Jj1691 (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Damselfish]] into Pomacentridae
Talk:Abudefduf

message: Seems like the species names should NOT have embedded hyperlinks if they don't exist.  Folks will get quickly frustrated when clicking on one species after another, simply to be taken to a message RE: "this page doesn't exist."
I suggest that the hyperlinks be REMOVED until the pages actually exist.  (If you want to include a "(create this page)" hyperlink AFTER each species name, fine; but de facto web usability rules mean that a HYPERLINK IMPLIES CONTENT.  If someone sees non-hyperlinked text, they assume (as they should) that there's NO CONTENT for that text.  Conversely, if text IS hyperlinked, the user should be able to assume that there IS (CURRENTLY!) CONTENT AVAILABLE.
If I don't hear from someone about this, I'll go ahead and change it myself.
philiptdotcom 12:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why are there links to nonexistent pages here?
Talk:Chromis

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cuvier, 1814. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Plantdrew (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuvier, 1814 listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Non-roster invitee

message: This would be better if merged into the Spring training article. Travel Plaza Babes 15:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, since non-roster invitees are typically signed well before spring training. We really need better coverage of MLB transaction rules, and lumping this article in with a tangentially-related subject would be a step backward. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 17:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Titoxd(?!?) 01:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous AFD result
Talk:Exit to Eden/Archive 1, Dominatrices

message: And let's not forget Rosie O'Donnell in her leather outfit.  Truly awesome.  Wahkeenah 18:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominatrices 

message: Visual on another website.  How cool.  not much free time.  10-27.     -DDR
??? -Rphunt 09:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit to Eden
Talk:Kermadec scalyfin

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:New Zealand black angelfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:New Zealand demoiselle

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ocellaris clownfish

message: Hello, I am a student at Washington University and for my behavioral ecology class I chose this article to edit. I added some sections to the behavior section and some other sections.
This is the assignment for the class:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:USEP/Courses/Behavioral_Ecology_(Joan_Strassmann)/2013_Assignment_5
Gseehra123 (talk) 02:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added behavior section

message: This says that its (Cuvier, 1830) instead of what's on here. Sidious1701(talk•email•todo) 02:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About.com 

message: *General: Consider more concise phrasing.  Sometimes sentences can be a bit long and hard to follow.  
*Shelter: The mutualistic relationship has already been established in the brief overview of behavior at the beginning of the section.  Consider changing the opening section, so there is no repetition.  
*Queue Selection: Double-check some of the grammar & phrasing in this section.  
*Juvenile: Don't need to clarify the necessity of shelter.
*Group Size: Some minor grammatical errors. (ex. "this correlation is provides")
*Reproductive Hierarchy: If you can, try to break this section up.  
*Food Habits: Consider adding hyperlinks to other pages.  (ex. omnivore) VAleles (talk) 23:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: Hello! I am a student for the Behavioral Ecology Class at Washington University (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_Program:Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Behavioral_Ecology_%28Fall_2013%29) I added additional information to the beginning basic summary, combined the distribution and habitat sections (and added information), made the reproduction/life history its own subsection, and added in the Human interaction section. Hopefully this added information will help get this article to good article status. I also made some minor grammatical changes, and deleted some extra references that were not used or that were replicated.
Gseehra123 (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Edit 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Anemone purple anemonefish.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 22, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-08-22. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Anemone purple anemonefish.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: But why is it called a Clownfish? If anyone knows, this would be a helpful addition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosefzai (talk • contribs) 21:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name?
Talk:One-spot puller

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed