Talk:Titanic (1953 film)

message: If anyone sees the movie, they would most likely remember that a siren sounded through out the time after the ship hit the iceberg. There was no siren or public adress systems on the Titanic. Also, in one scene where Thelma Ritter's character found out that one man had disguised himself as a lady to get on a lifeboat. This is only have been reported once when Second Officer Lightholler almost refused to let a 13 year old boy into a lifeboat, so a woman put her hat on her 13 year old son to get him into a lifeboat. The film also shows all the people that didn't make it to a lifeboat singing "Nearer My God to Thee." The last few moments of the Titanic was not accompinied by music, as every one would be rushing to the stern, everything else crashing foward, and eventually the stern breaking off. The scene when Richard came in with breakfast in bed for Julia is not accurate, as the only way to get breakfast on the Titanic was by going to the dining room. The way the water tight doors is innacurate (from the side, like a sliding door, where it should go up and down). The dinning room is heavily orinnate, where the actual ship is a white collor. One woman is depicted in the smoking room playing cards with some men. Women were not allowed to enter the smoking room on any British ship at the time. Norman asked his father to join him for a shufle board tornnament, which there wasn't one on board, as well as a talior shop. Finally, the movie depected a couple explosions before the ship sank. No explosions were ever reported by survivors, but the Titanic breaking in two might have sounded like a explosion. 
207.161.204.39 21:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Years ago..way back in 1986 or so... it was KNOWN the reason the Titanic broke APART why n where it did, there was a built-in expansion joint there. Actually almost like a hinge; so in high seas, could bend a bit. BUT NOW>>>> all this babble shit bout 'oh there was a weakness' and 'oh dear we have to find out' and 'gee what happen? why'd it break apart?' sooo sad when scholarly info is so SOON forgotten/lost by the unknowning and misinformed. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: :Image:Titanic 1953 film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Titanic 1953 film.jpg

message: I think this page would benefit from a disambiguation link. This would make it easier to find the correct film with the title "Titanic" - the 1953 drama, the 1943 Nazi propaganda film, or the 1997 version ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.176.236.158 (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking of Robert Wagner... i got such a kick and most lemmings of the 1997 film dont know, just how much Leonardo DiCaprio was 'made-up' to look like ole RJ, back then in ths film. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 03:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation link? 

message: Didn't the studio invite survivors from the sinking of the real Titanic, to the premiere? Recall hearing something about it. Apparently, many of them had to be carried out (the studio had failed to consider that the sinking of the Titanic had been the worst day of these peoples lives. And now had to re-live it through a movie) due to shock. Is there some source, where we can get confirmation on this? (As it seems it should be mentioned somewhere in the article.)Coq87rouge (talk) 22:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survivors invited to the premiere 

message: The [10] link for the Pauline Kael quote is super spammy, just immediate pop ups on my phone. 72.211.108.104 (talk) 02:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pauline Kael link spam