Talk:Soccer AM

message: This user is EASY! EASY! EASY!
thought I'd make this as a laugh.  There were so many possibilities for the text, but this seemed the obvious.  Add it to your user space using .  DJR 19:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The image for easy doesn't seem to work - have a look at my userpage (a pretty rubbish one!)--Gavinio 08:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - copyrighted images, fair use or otherwise, are not allowed in templates or in the "User" namespace, so they cannot/will not be allowed.  I agree though - they do look pretty crappy without them!  DJR (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Check out WP:UBX.  It's got the works.  DJR (Talk) 18:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Just type "Template:User blah blah" in the search bar (obviously replacing "blah blah" with whatever you want to call the template), and then click "create article".  Then just copy and paste the relevant userbox info.  DJR (Talk) 20:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soccer AM templates 

message: I just removed a whole lot of older vandalism.  I think I got it all, but someone who knows the show should probably give it a really good look and make sure there aren't any factual innaccuracies that I may have missed.  Thanks! -- Vary | Talk 17:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of Sneaky Vandalism 

message: I have created a subpage, Soccer AM/List of guests, to tabulate the celebrities who appear on the show.  Back dating is going to be stupendously difficult, but a future record will be quite feasible if viewers are able to contribute.  If anyone watches the show, please update the subpage when you can.  If anyone can improve the formatting, that'd be pretty sweet too!  
Cheers, DJR (Talk) 15:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry I can't do it, but surely a list of Soccerettes is in order too?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.28.185.135 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 27 March 2006
No - it's Soccerettes would be going too far as they are not encyclopedic.  At least studio guests are (bar one) all linked people... and celebrity soccerettes are different!  DJR (Talk) 23:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of guests 

message: I have made a navigation box for the show, which you can see below. I haven't included it on the page yet, but may do if you think it's a good idea. To use it, type . Ross1 20:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navigation Box 

message: This entry should probably have some info on Brian Regan.
On the first few series he was a third presenter along side Tim and Helen. He was a Liverpudlian ex-Brookside actor and often presented foreign leagues by impersonating an extreme stereotype of native of that country (including a Spanish presenter called Juan Kerr and German presenter Herr-Bang "Woof-Woof").
He seemed to vanish at the end of a series, never to be seen again or even mentioned (although I remember Tim once saying something like "we're fed up with you asking where's "he's" gone, we can't tell you", which may have been a comment about Brian).
He was also the original keeper in the car park as "The Fat Cat".
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0716390/
http://members.aol.com/cowzegg/gold.htm implies that Brian may not have been there from the start, but joined soon after.
A quick google shows lots of people asking what happened to him, but no answers.
(Forgot to sign that SlamTilt 15:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brian Regan 

message: Hey does anybody know the music used in Lovejoy's muscleman bit? (The one where viewers send in clips of themselves posing, usually before the soccerette segment).  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.250.138 (talk • contribs).
No    ?    ?     ?
::  I'm pretty sure it's Jean-Michel Jarre's Oxygene IV. I'm certain it's something from either his Oxygene or Equinoxe albums SlamTilt 16:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muscle Music 

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 15, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: the prose is bad at times
:2. Factually accurate?: pass
:3. Broad in coverage?: pass - fairly long - is there anything you can cut out?
:4. Neutral point of view?: pass
:5. Article stability? pass
:6. Images?: All need detailed sources and specific fair use rationales
Its got no references - quite a few external links though. Inline references are best. Gordon Brown's statement could do with a reference. Its listy and times too, and this could do with conversion into prose.
The auto peer review javascript program says:
:*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 12 yards, use 12 yards, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 12 yards.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
**it has been
**allege
**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): hasn't, don't, won't.
*This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with THE FOOTNOTE. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add .[?]
*The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
If you want me to elaborate on anything, let me know. RHB Talk - Edits 15:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: I'm suggesting the soccer am page needs to be improved. As it stands there is too much information and in no particular order or content. I suggest Information is put in to the relevant years so with each football season hence forth the information will be relevant to the era of the show when it was present.
:This page failed it's good article nomination and needs massive changes. I am going to start with some massive cuts. There is to many lists and non relevant information. --McMahon-Man 17:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page improvement

message: Helen Chamberlain wasn't the first female presenter - Jane Hoffen was alongside Russ Williams in the beginning. Also the first game involving the fans wasn't called 'Rob Jones', it was called 'Ballseye' and the fans had to hit a target with the face of one of their local rivals on it, the second season it was the first game where the fans had to get the ball through a hole, and the game was renamed 'I Can't Believe it's not Ballseye'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.164.208 (talk) 09:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original presenter and ball game

message: Not football, I'd like to know why the Americanism soccer is used as opposed to the proper name for the beautiful game.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:CA0D:8C00:7595:ACA:86CA:A93B (talk) 09:51, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Soccer isn’t an Americanism. It’s an abbreviation of “Association Football” that originated in English private schools. It was a common alternative to football in the UK until the early ninties. ITV in particular used “soccer” in many of their broadcasts and it also explains the name of the other Sky programme “Soccer Saturday”. I think it became to be seen as an Americanism because they only use that word. NotMuchToSay (talk) 08:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Why soccer?

message: Just been watching an old EastEnders on the "old" channel, it was series 16 ep 8, and it looked like a very young Tubes in there. Looked in the end credits to see if it was him, but his character never came up. Tried looking on t'internet but couldn't find anything. 
Does anyone know? See if you can find the episode and have a look. 2A00:23C6:3309:6601:2C5C:9D79:EBF4:6AF9 (talk) 14:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Tubes on EastEnders?