Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article 

message: 


 
Ikip (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current photos

message: This seems trivial, and is the only real content of the Afghanistan–Germany relations page:
:The relations between Germany and Afghanistan began during World War I.  People of Afghanistan referred to Germany as German kākā ("uncle German").
Ikip (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Germany

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of diplomatic missions of Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516214607/http://www.mfa.gov.af/afMission.asp to http://www.mfa.gov.af/afMission.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There should be some update, or symbol, denoting which of the diplomatic missions are closed, which are "kept open by the Republic in exile" and which are "officially run by the Afghan government under the Taliban".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:C39F:A200:FC62:BFE5:6CD9:581A (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , separated by government represented. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

text: @2607:FEA8:C39F:A200:FC62:BFE5:6CD9:581A Currently Afghan embassy in Iraq,Netherland,Spain,Czech Republic, Afghan consulate in Ankara,Turkey and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia is fully under the control of Taliban regime.But why you have not updated yet? 114.130.181.254 (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: 2021 update necessary with Taliban

message: Please provide the relevant MoS item and/or discussion that established this "standard format" that prevents me from grouping missions by the government they represent. I have not been able to find one. I believe it is important to separate out which missions are controlled by which government because they are representing different entities and serving radically different purposes (and the IP in the above section also had the idea, BTW). I did not make any other changes to the formatting than drawing a distinction between the Taliban and the western-backed governments. If this "standard format" does exist somewhere, I'd imagine the kind of diplomatic nightmare Afghanistan is currently embroiled in was not foreseen in its design. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Standard format"