Talk:Jagdish Tytler

message: I followed the link that supposedly indentified Jagdish Tytler as a Christian but could not even find the word Christian in the article. http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110330/jsp/orissa/story_13783862.jsp This article shows that Jagdish Tytler indentifies himself as a Hindu. If someone could correct this it would be great. (174.1.73.129 (talk))
:Maybe? It's dubious as it was supposed he declared himself Hindu in order to win more votes after going to a only hindu temple. I will change.  
::anyway its not vandalism how youve stated it just a minor error jheez— Preceding unsigned comment added by Soniadakota (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Jagdish Tytler Christian? ?

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Jagdish Tytler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071220172927/http://www.tribuneindia.com:80/2007/20071219/main1.htm to http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20071219/main1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jagdish Tytler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207115707/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20071219/main1.htm to http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20071219/main1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jagdish Tytler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421030016/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?sectionName=HomePage&id=758d6dce-1e0b-4899-8fb4-3d68e706aa63&Headline=Tytler%20granted%20bail%20in%20defamation%20case to http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?sectionName=HomePage&id=758d6dce-1e0b-4899-8fb4-3d68e706aa63&Headline=Tytler+granted+bail+in+defamation+case
*Added  tag to http://www.ptinews.com/pti%5Cptisite.nsf/0/E37D672C5393770E652575870057060B?OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060912114404/http://www.witness84.com/action/ to http://www.witness84.com/action/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article until Wednesday contained this line in the LEAD that said 
I had updated this line and copy edited it  to state 
My edits were reverted  and "Murderous mobs" was again restored into the article. As I have noted in threads above the article was maintained as an WP:Attack page by certain users with vested interests. User:Sitush not sure if you noticed the murderous mob in the lead already, but may I know why such WP:SENSATIONAL word such as "murderous mobs" are still in the lead. IMHO this is violating neutral tone, and should be removed or copy edited appropriately. --DBigXrayᗙ 21:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I wondered about murderous, too. It seems to be emotive, which is not what we should be doing. - Sitush (talk) 06:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Even Nanavati's report doesn't mention the word. I have copy edited the phrase to remove this reference. I have changed it to "The Commission had noted that he was probably involved in attacks on the Sikh..." which is closest in meaning to what Nanavati actually reported.--DBigXrayᗙ 12:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

text: I have made changes in the line to conform to what was said in the report. The line now says, The Commission had noted that he was probably had a hand in organizing attacks on the Sikh community in Delhi --DBigXrayᗙ 15:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: And I've changed it again, partly to fix the grammar issues but also because the Commission specifically said "very probably". It is significant wording and we should not ignore it. - Sitush (talk) 16:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No concerns with the change. Although I feel "probably" and "very probably" are both vague terms, but if you consider it significant, I will not object to it.--DBigXrayᗙ 16:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murderous mobs  

message: We now have a 2019 source that apparently shows him saying he was in the area but one of thousands present and another source, cited further down the article, where he says he was not in the area. We can't leave the article in this state, and I think in the desire to bring some balance we may at present be creating confusion. - Sitush (talk) 16:22, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sitush, no they are different areas. He is accused of organising violence near Azad market, while the funeral was in Teen murti Bhavan some 10 km away. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, sorry. Can that be made more clear? - Sitush (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  here, based on this source and Nanavati report. The IE article also notes that he got 3 clean chits from CBI. --DBigXrayᗙ 21:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The wiki article had stated that "Tytler, then a member of the Indian Parliament, was complaining to his supporters about relatively "small" number of Sikhs killed in his parliamentary constituency Delhi Sadar, which in his opinion had undermined his position in the ruling Indian National Congress party of India."
This is a blatant WP:BLP violation. There is no evidence or reliable source that Tytler said these things. these are unsubstantiated and unproven accusations from lawyers and not Tytlers own statement. as is being stated in the wiki article. accordingly I have removed this from the article. This is a biography article so we have to be careful about such content being added carelessly to maintain an WP:ATTACKPAGE against this living person.--DBigXrayᗙ 05:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated quote attributed to Tytler 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  16:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem