lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Baculites

message: I would be happy to submit an image if I could figure out how to do it. --David C. Wade (User:12.1.19.118)
:Response on talk pages. --DanielCD 13:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Why is the article named Baculite instead of Baculites? Abyssal leviathin 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name?

message: Strikes me as a lot of nonsense regardless of arguments given.  The surface sculpture consisting of slanted sinuous ribs and forwardly slanted aperture simply don't indicate such. Of course that fact that some have speculated this should be included, along with reasons for a horizontal orientation.  J.H.McDonnell (talk) 16:58, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Find supporting references and the article can be adjusted as needed per what the literature says.--Kevmin § 18:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vertical?

message: While certain species, such as the type and maybe a couple of more, that can be well discussed may add tenor to the article, it seems having a long list of names serves no purpose other than than to add length. Perhaps the topic even belongs under a subheading in some other section. J.H.McDonnell (talk) 23:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Species list
Talk:Avianca Flight 203

message: So why isnt this terrorism? 199.245.163.1 18:34, 22 October 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the attackers were drug barons motivated by profit, not terrorists fighting for a political cause. GCarty 15:21, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nowhere in Wikipedia's definition of terrorism does it say that terrorism is necessarily politically motivated. It's a strategy, not an ideology. Apart from that, would you really say the Medellín cartel was not a political force?--84.188.184.226 18:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I happen to have a picture of the wreckage though the source is known.
Could I upload it?
Minako-Chan* 22:03, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture of the wreckage
Talk:Purple Heart

message: Is there a specific reason that the colors are capitalized under the Appearance header? RaD Man 17:44, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance 

message: Yogi Berra was a 10-time world series winner, and considered by some to be the greatest catcher in major league baseball. He received a purple heart for his service in WWII from 1943-1945. 2601:40D:4280:25A0:9D6C:D0A5:6C07:D84F (talk) 00:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be considered. We should honor all purple heart recipients. 45.22.130.42 (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Recipients addition
Talk:Dialects in Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia

message: I've moved the page to a slightly different title, though it's still not quite correct to perpetuate the old name so much when in reality it's no longer being used. --Joy [shallot] 17:55, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Joy, there are no Croatian, Serbian and Bosnian dialects. Chakavian and Kaykavian are not Serbian nor Bosnian, as well as Torlakian is not Croatian nor Bosnian. This article is one of ex-YU nonsenses. And it should be merged with "South Slavic languages" or "Western South Slavic languages". --millosh (talk (sr:)) 00:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Fort Bridgewoods

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.   --dashiellx (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Should this article be "Bridgewood" or "Bridgewoods" ? I ask because both forms of spelling are used in the article. Consistent it is not.  RASAM (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Bridgewoods. The external link pdf calls it that, and has a photo with that name. Local history booklets and Saunders Fortress Britain use the plural Vicarage (talk) 22:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Then it might be a good idea to move this article to Fort Bridgewoods, and for consistency, edit the text accordingly. At the moment it is a rather pointless redirect. What do you think Vicarage ? (By the way, I'll do the text, if you do the moving; or tell me how to do it).  RASAM (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, but I fear moving the article would upset the wikipedian gods, as I don't know the protocol. Can I leave the whole thing to you. Vicarage (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said above, I'll do the text, but I don't know how to move the page; if you are in the same boat, we're both snookered and that's a shame. RASAM (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Fort Clarence

message: The owner of www.forts.org.uk has copied this text into Wikipedia. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fort_Charlotte
More info is needed on the Medway tower: where it was and what it was. I'm on to it. --Cunningham 12:58, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.    --dashiellx (talk) 12:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Watts' Charity bought property in Maidstone Road in 1857 and this purchase included an adjacent site known as Fort Clarence.  In 1976 the charity built new almshouses on their Fort Clarance site.  See citation to Hinkley p.61 on the Richard Watts page.  Does anyone know if this charity land was part of the original Fort, or merely adjacent?  If the former I will add a note to the main page and wikilink the names. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:23, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watts' Almhouses
Talk:IS tank family

message: There is not a section for the IS-5! Add one or explain why here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.60.116.143 (talk) 20:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The IS-5 basically became the T-10.  Gonna add sources to confirm this in a bit. - MTWEmperor (talk • contribs) 06:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing section

message: Russian Wiki and many other Russian sources (for example https://warspot.ru/4474-posledniy-sovetskiy-tyazheloves) claim that T-10 was IS-8, not IS-10. IS-8 was renamed T-10 because it was the tenth heavy tank in Soviet service (after T-35, KV-1, KV-2, KV-1S, KV-85, IS-1, IS-2, IS-3 and IS-4). Is it possible to rename it in the article?
Also, when I try to look up "ИС-10" (in Russian), the only results are IS-10 resistance meter (which is definitely not the IS-10 tank) or very old web articles (apprx. 2006-2011). All newer articles claim that T-10 is IS-8. Alexey CT (talk) 18:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-10 is IS-8 

message: there is literally no information on this tank on this page Originalcola (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  is-1
Talk:Cyril Ramaphosa

message: "Following the first fully democratic elections in 1994, he became a Member of Parliament (MP) and was elected the chairperson of its Constitutional Assembly on 24 May 1994, a central role in Mandela's Government of National Unity."
The link for Constitutional Assembly is just the generic article, and not the article for the South African Constitutional Assembly from 1994. I believe this is a mistake and should be ammended. Thanks. --190.202.63.122 (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Constitutional Assembly in Rise in ANC (1990-1996) section
Category talk:Immunology

message: Wouldn't it be better to bring this category together with :Category:Immune system? Nina 19:11, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I favour absorption into *ology.216.234.170.79 15:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I found this talk page in the category, and I don't think it should be there. A colon leading a category will link to it without putting the page you are on into that category, so I changed User:ZayZayEM's comments appropriately. Brewhaha@edmc.net 06:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am beginning to lean towards one category for both, with Immune system as the parent. The problem is that it is difficult to decide (for me at least) which pages belong in :Category:Immunology and which ones belong in :Category:Immune system. Perhaps a bit of input from others would be useful in deciding which articles should go in which category. From the cat headings: 
"Immunology is the study of the immune system and its reaction to pathogens...The medical field that deals with these diseases is called clinical immunology" 
--and--
"The immune system refers to all of the cells, tissues, organs and processes that protect an organism from invasion by pathogens. Viruses, bacteria, parasites, and some toxins are some of pathogens that the immune system is involved in eliminating from the body."
So it would seem to me that all of the immune system diseases, techniques and immunologists should be in Immunology. While all of descriptive pages for cell types, cytokines, pathways, and receptors should go in Immune system? Any thoughts? Also posted at category:Immune system.--DO11.10 00:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're both Immunology. One is Chemistry and Anatomy within the discipline of study or within the medical discipline. I think they can be considered both subcategories of Immunology and supercategories of it. IOW, much Chemistry and Anatomy would fit under Immunology, and a lot more topics (including Immunology) would fit under Chemistry and Anatomy. I'm running into synonyms in Neurology, too. Brewhaha@edmc.net 06:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with DO11. Anything in Immune System is immunology; but the reverseis not true. Immunology should remain as parent category. :Category:Immune system should only contain "cells, tissues, organs and processes that protect an organism from invasion". --ZayZayEM 07:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Category Issue
Talk:Chin (disambiguation)

message: ------
;from Butt chin and probably not worth merging here
A butt chin is a certain type of chin with a dimple in the center, so that the chin itself resembles someone's behind (sort of).
Noted examples of people with butt chins are Cary Grant and Sandra Bullock.
:Sandra Bullock? There's got to be a better example than that! Aaron Eckhart? Ugh, someone can think of a pop person...--69.170.226.182 19:35, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Thyestes

message: "Only as he entered adulthood did Thyestes reveal the truth to Aegisthus, that he was both father and uncle to the boy."
By my calculations Thyestes is both father and grandfather to the boy... am I right? Mat334 20:09, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It seems a bit odd that Aeschyclus's Agamemnon is listed in the Influences in Literature section, considering the play was written centuries before Seneca was even born. They're connected, but through mythology rather than literary influence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:248:4504:9E80:5D66:1499:B52C:13D7 (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved that sentence on Seneca to section just above, where I assume it was intended to be. Paul August ☎ 17:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: It seems odd ...

message: See above Dtss2017 (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First and second picture, which is the same, has no description, only the names of two of the characters depicted. Furthermore, there is nothing regarding the artist who painted it or it’s title, if any. 

message: “When Agamemnon left Mycenae for the Trojan War, Aegisthus seduced Agamemnon's wife, Clytemnestra, and the couple plotted to kill her husband upon his return. They succeeded, killing Agamemnon and his new concubine, Cassandra. Clytemnestra and Aegisthus had three children: Aletes, Erigone, and Helen who died as an infant.”
Iphegenia’s murder, at the hands of her father, Agamemnon, is a crucial, and sole reason for the murder of Agamemnon, upon his return from the Trojan war. This is missing and, imho, the only reason why Clytemnestra takes up with Aegisthus. Dtss2017 (talk) 18:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key plot point missing
Talk:IBM i

message: EWLwiki
The IBM i article is for IBM i OS, not for extensive discussion of hardware. The IBM Power Systems article is a good location for discussion of hardware for IBM i. 
I ask Vt320 and Guy_Harris for consensus on removing from the IBM i article the content which is duplicative of content in the IBM_AS/400 article, specifically, discussions of hardware. These IBM i sections have content and verbiage almost identical to content found on the AS/400 page.  
 o  Origin                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_i#Origin
 o  The Move to PowerPC.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_i#The_move_to_PowerPC
 o  Rebranding.           https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_i#Rebranding
 o  The IBM i article sections on History at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_i#History and Architecture also have much content that is repetitive of material in the IBM_AS/400
EWLwiki (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Every single section you have listed is about the operating system, and not the hardware. It is of course difficult to not discuss hardware somewhat when discussing things like the origin of the OS (given that it was designed around the AS/400) and the move to the PowerPC-AS architecture, but at least some of that is needed for context. Vt320 (talk) 20:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Vt320 here.  The discussion of hardware here doesn't strike me as extensive; it's providing necessary context, as Vt320 notes. Guy Harris (talk) 22:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend Removal from IBM i article material that is duplicative of content found in AS/400 article
Talk:Willem 's Gravesande

message: Is the apostrophe is his first name supposed to be there? I've never encountered such, in either English or Dutch. 165.91.64.228 (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: name

message: If anyone wants to fix the math formatting, go right ahead... Mashford 20:33, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nothing Too Serious
Talk:Google

message: A division of Google. Article has little content, is more like a stub. We don't normally have separate articles on company divisions unless these divisions enjoy notability independent from the parent, which is obviously not the case here. — kashmīrī TALK 12:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: On a procedural note, one of the templates was removed with this edit on the 11th December, functionally ending the proposal before a formal merge close; I've now removed the other template, but of course anyone is free to start a new proposal - or just update the Google AI page with more on Gemini ... Klbrain (talk) 15:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Google AI]] into [[Google]] 

message: The redirect Google. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Gonnym (talk) 12:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Google.]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by TotalSolarEclipse (talk) 16:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change

message: — Assignment last updated by XiaoyuChennyu (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP24 - Sect 201 - Thu
Talk:Adam Ant

message: The article that discusses Ant's musical career appears to include much duplicated content. Ant is primarily known as a musical artist and having a separate article around that results in this duplication. An added complication is that the referencing of the article heavily relies on the primary source material of adam-ant.net, a semi-official website with mostly news and lists of tour dates.   Karst (talk) 13:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to merge it, feel free. Otherwise, that tag is going to sit on this article for a long time. Or remove some information from this article to trim the musical career section if the main article goes into the details.  oncamera  (talk page) 16:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I am in favor of the merge, if only because that "career" article is an unnecessary duplicate that shouldn't exist in the first place. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)  14:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Karst (talk) 20:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 

message: The article says: " and I have no reason to doubt that. Does this mean Goddard is himself a Romanicha person? i.e. all people with one Romani grandparent are also Romani? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Romanichal people]]
Talk:Mahte

message: Why have "mahte" as the main article title and "mate" in the subsidiary articles? Can we not be consistent, with one as the principal spelling and the other noted as "also"? Just asking (I know nothing -- yet -- about Latvian mythology!) -- Picapica 23:38, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Corect spelling in Latvian is Māte, when writing without macrons it is Mate (or sometimes Maate), Mahte is acctualy German not English spelling (German way of spelling was used for spelling Latvian until 20. century) - H is used to indicate long vowel (as is macron or double vowel).
BTW is nummber of deities correct ? I was told that there are about 270 not "sixsty-seventy" -- Xil - talk 09:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Y (game)

message: The proof that Y ends in a draw has been removed allegedly because it was flawed. It was argued that a linked paged stated that the proof was "in error". However, I cannot see the problem in the proof that used to be here and the flawed proof mentionned by the other website is actually a different argument. Can anybody explain in what sense the proof is false ? If not, I suppose it is safe to undo the removal edit. Halladba (talk) 08:27, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No draw proof 

message: There's now a line in the intro stating that Ea (last name?) developed Y.  Who is that?  If it's supposed to be someone famous (else why mention it in the intro to an article?), then why isn't it wikilinked, so we can all read about him?Sbalfour (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Who (or what) is Ea?

message: :
I changed that to a quarter of a geodesic sphere, because such a sphere has 12 five-way points.  But on closer inspection the board is consistent with 10 faces of an icosahedron (each subdivided into 10 triangles); six more five-way vertices are partially represented on the edges of the board.  I'm not happy with hemisphere though, as it is not bounded by a plane. —Tamfang (talk) 01:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  of a sphere
Talk:Nasturtium (plant genus)

message: It should be noted that ITIS only includes Nasturtium gambellii (S. Wats.) O. Schulz in this genus, and places the watercresses in Rorippa  WormRunner | Talk 00:13, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as you well know, these things change all the time.  Rorippa is an old name, and maybe the species have been moved back into it.  These things are always difficult to track down, as one never knows from one (or several) source(s), what is current or most accepted.  My source is 1999, but a revised version (I can only assume the taxonomy was all revised up to 1999). I think we can only note what we find, and that allows others to modify conservatively towards the "correct" or most modern taxonomy. Do you want to add something from the ITIS? - Marshman 01:36, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  My main point was to note somewhere that there was disagreement over the placement.  I do not know whether the ITIS version is the best or not, but the fact that some references place the watercresses here and others place them in Rorippa should be available somehow in the article or its discussion page. -- WormRunner | Talk 03:57, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Jill Sobule (album)

message: The Glitterati reference appears broken, going to a parked page containing nothing but useless adds. New citation needed or possibly it should be removed entirely?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.197.191.204 (talk) 05:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

message: The "I Kissed A Girl" single and video should get an article or a large section, since it was fairly controversial and garnered alot of press. 70.51.8.75 (talk) 10:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I Kissed A Girl
Talk:Eusko Alkartasuna

message: It seems to me like EA social support is more overtly independentist than PNV's; that, if true at all, could be noted in the article as one more difference.
Also, there should be a Navarre template here, because actually EA's stronghold is there. I would do that myself.... if I wasn't a dummy with frames etc. Mountolive 03:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences
Talk:Lyudmila Pavlichenko

message: Probably worth adding.
https://borderlands.fandom.com/wiki/Lyudmila  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.150.38.83 (talk) 22:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sniper Rifle in Borderlands Video Game
Talk:Tracy Nelson (actress)

message: Can we find a better (ie. more recent) photo of her? The current one is from 30 years ago... Logicman1966 (talk) 11:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  better photo 

message: The article lead calls Nelson a "fifth-generation performer," but then describes her as descending from three generations of performers, starting with her great-grandparents. Wouldn't that make her a fourth-generation performer?
:Four is all I can enumerate. A previous edit by User:Teakayenn (claiming to be Tracy Nelson) asserted six generations and indicated that the Snyders were with the Hagenbeck-Wallace Circus but I don't find any substantiating source. Ancestry family data (1900 census) says Roy Hilliard Snyder was an actor whose father was a farmer. I've changing it to four. SBaker43 (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifth or Fourth Generation? 

message: Traci Nelson was not in A League Of Their Own. That was Lori Petty. 2600:1700:E910:1D20:E86B:617F:4EE4:1E1E (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A league of their own
Talk:Irregularities and exceptions in Interlingua

message: If i is unstressed before a vowel, it is pronounced like in "onion" or "phobia" (instead of like in "machine").
I can't work this out at all. Someone needs to go through the pronunciation section and rewrite it using the IPA so it actually makes sense.
— Trilobite (Talk) 01:58, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Economic liberalism

message: I have responded to the banner note that "This article's lead section may be too long for the length of the article.", and I have now removed subsequently the March 2022 "long lead" tag as a secondary minor edit. As per my original edit note, I've restructured the existing material, and moved much of it into the Overview section. I've also taken some editorial license in reformatting and restructuring for improved readability / clarity. My intent was to leave the intentions of the original authors key points unchanged. I note there is a Script warning about one or more "cite journal" templates having maintenance messages, but I don't know how to surface these. Paulszym (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lengthy lead section
Talk:Polka Party!

message: The articles about Toothless People and Ruthless People say that 'Polka Party!' is Weird Al's worst selling album. Since I don't know any reliable sources for this and I am also too tired to look for them right now (and because my English is pretty bad as well) I do not want to write this into the article. This  is the only thing that I found. de:Benutzer:Lockenlord -- 84.133.183.181 (talk) 07:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  == Al's worst selling album == 

message: The intro section states that Here's Johnny is inspired by the movie Short Circuit, but the later description (as well as the lyrics to the song) does not support this.
2warped@gmail.com 66.41.250.223 (talk) 03:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short Circuit? Not Ed McMahon?