lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Captan

message: I have been involved with gas odorants for years and don't know anyone who uses the name Captan for ethyl mercaptan. An internet search comes up with the ag chemical and not the odorant.   Ethyl mercaptan is also not used for natural gas. JSR (talk) 12:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded the hatnote so it no longer makes the statement that captan is a name for the ethyl mercaptan . I will have no objections if it's removed altogether. – Uanfala (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation section at beginning
Talk:Carbachol

message: I believe the molecular formula should not have a charge
Carbachol is a chloride salt so the structure should have a chloride counterion, formula, SMILE and IUPAC name should reflect chloride--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 22:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an image that includes the chloride counterion.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  General comments on article 

message: What is synthesis  of it? Dr. Ashu Rana (talk) 00:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  synthesis
Talk:Hydrogen peroxide–urea

message: Why show stereo bonds in the image?--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure image 

message: "The chemical is a skin, eye and respiratory irritant. It is also corrosive and causes burns. It doesn't hurt at 10% concentration (3% hydrogen peroxide equivalent) but it might hurt at 35% (12% equivalent), causing white chemical burns on skin and gums alike." -- Please cite. -- Writtenonsand (talk) 12:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite, please 

message: The name of the image at the top of the chembox showing the structural formula is "urea.png", so it's clearly an error. Also, below that, the first ball-and-rod depiction seems to correspond to the top image, so I think that might also be an error.
What's left of my high school chemistry was barely enough to suspect there was a problem. Thus, I am forced to leave the correction to someone who knows much more than I do.
Zgystardst (talk) 20:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous images 

message: I propose to move Carbamide peroxide to Urea hydrogen peroxide (or something similar). Chemists dont use the term carbamide very much..  So my plan was to do the move and then go back and correct the resulting double directs, which appear to be about ten in number.  It seems noncontroversial but I am giving a notice in case people sense a problem.  We also need to change the image which needs to show some sort of H-bonded adduct.  I am away and cannot get that pdf now but will correct that issue (see previous comment on this Talk page). --Smokefoot (talk) 23:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move of [[Carbamide peroxide]]

message: user:Eddie123e: Thanks for tagging it. Have you seen that there are references for all the reactions just below the picture? Minihaa (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks for clarification. Minihaa (talk) 10:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  verification needed?
Talk:Carbo-mer

message: Quoted from the article:
"The final step in its organic synthesis is organic oxidation of the triol with stannous chloride and hydrochloric acid in diethyl ether."
see reaction scheme ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c0/CarbobenzeneSynthesis.png ). How should that reaction be an oxidation of the substrate? There is no oxidant (Sn2+/H+/Et2O is a reductant towards most organic substrates) and there also is no oxidation (electron loss on the carbon atoms of the substrate) apparent. Could someone clarify, how this should be an oxidation or whether the quoted text is a typo? Thanks,--93.192.166.208 (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for clarification

message: After a quick googling, I can't find another instance of the word being hyphenated. I see that it is sometimes formatted this way in scientific literature, but even then it seems to be the less popular format. JeffJonez (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Carbo-mer and carbomer are different things. "Carbomer" is a trade name for the common, commercial water-absorbing polymers, "polyacrylic acid". "Carbo-mer" (sometimes written as "carbomer") is a rare term for some exotic expanded molecules. The article was split in 2012, but cleanup was not complete. I updated the hatnotes on "Carbo-mer" and "Polyacrylic acid", relinked some pages to the right articles, and made "Carbomer" and "Carbomers" redirect to "Polyacrylic acid" (instead of here to "Carbo-mer"). -A876 (talk) 05:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the hyphen in the title?
Talk:Salève

message: We need a source for this: Shedrub Choekhor Ling is a center of Tibetan Buddhism located on the Salève. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already this: Shedrub Choekhor Ling site, in the external links. It contains an account on the centre inauguration by the Dalai Lama on August 14, 2011. Sapphorain (talk) 07:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of cult
Talk:Carbon suboxide

message: At the end of the carbon suboxide article, carbon suboxided is said to be "postulated to be poly(α-pyronic)". Now, this, of course, leads to the question, what is "poly(α-pyronic)"? This is a question, however, to which I found no answer. I searched on Wikipedia for α-pyronic and pyronic, and finding nothing, I then searched on Google for α-pyronic, pyronic, and finally poly(α-pyronic). The only relevant response I got was a small paper that was about carbon suboxide, and said, without detail, that poly-carbonsuboxide should be poly(α-pyronic). So, what is "poly(α-pyronic)"?--IdiotsOpposite (talk) 03:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Pyrone shows a image of 2-pyrone (α-pyrone) and this is the substructure present in  poly-carbonsuboxide.--Stone (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page for cumulenes specifies that all cumulenes are hydrocarbons - are these oxocarbons cumulenes or not, then? PurpleQuaver (talk) 01:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cumulene
Talk:Carbon trioxide

message: I could not fix this reference to the production of CO3 in corona discharges: SpringerLink Home - Main  Would anyoneplease help? Thanks, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 02:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: done -lysdexia 06:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfixable refrence 

message: I temporarily removed this sentence from the article:
:The half-life of carbon trioxide is 30 minutes.
As a minimum it needs to be clarified --- unedr which conditions? I could not find any source for it. Moreover it constrasts with the assertion in another paper that CO3 in liquid CO2 at -45°C is undetectable after 1 minute. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 06:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifetime 30 minutes? 

message: Hey! I noticed that the word ground state was mentioned and I don't know how to put a link for it. would anyone be so kind to do that for me? Bazzasayslol (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ground state
Talk:Carbonyl fluoride

message: Is it dangerous for the environment?
Dinan Blueje (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What isn't under certain circumstances? --Smokefoot (talk) 02:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

text: As the article says, it is acutely toxic.  But it is very reactive with water, so will be rapidly decomposed upon exposure to any environment with moisture.  ChemNerd (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Tteokbokki

message: I've removed the following section:
Analyzing tteokbokki -- Tteokbokki can be analyzed into different levels based on its sauce. There are different levels of hotness which be seen in the Topokki Sauce Hot Taste Unit. There is also a difference in the coefficient of viscosity of the sauce. Both of these measurements are divided into 5 levels. Recipes of tteokbokki should be based in those different measurements.
... because I think it's nonsense.  Maikel (talk) 10:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've removed a section 

message: What does the "bokki" in Tteokbokki mean?  Thanks, Maikel (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: On my computer, I cannot see the first letters of steokbokgi, I see only the "bokgi". When I disable the korean font CSS, I can however see that there is a non representable character, while with the CSS, this character is simply invisible. Is this expected? --Erdpferd (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Font / Letters 

message: is ddeokbokki per Revised_Romanization_of_Korean#Consonant_letters The initial is dd. Since 떡볶이 the tigeut (ㄷ) is at the beginning, it's dd, not tt.--KimYunmi (talk) 01:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @KimYunmi: The table on Revised Romanization of Korean lists "tt" as the romanization of ㄸ in an initial postion, unlike ㄷ, which it lists as romanizing to "d" in an initial position and "t" in a final one.  This agrees with https://www.korean.go.kr/front_eng/roman/roman_01.do, which only says that "The sounds ㄱ, ㄷ, and ㅂ are transcribed respectively as g, d, and b before a vowel" and says no such thing about ㄲ, ㄸ, and ㅃ.  The examples include 벚꽃 romanizing to "beotkkot", which would be "beotggot" following your proposed rule.  The automatic converter at http://roman.cs.pusan.ac.kr/ also agrees with the conventional spelling. --bjh21 (talk) 19:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised Romanization
Talk:SMS Karlsruhe

message: What sort of "spontaneous internal explosion" destroyed the Karlsruhe?  Is anything else known about the incident?  Peter Bell (talk) 07:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a range of possibilities, but there hasn't been an investigation into the cause (as far as I'm aware - this is in part due to the fact that the wreck is too deep to dive). It was likely a magazine explosion. These were fairly common during the period - for example,  was destroyed by one in 1915 and the  was nearly destroyed by one in 1916. There were many others. Parsecboy (talk) 10:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explosion?
Talk:Séez, Savoie

message: Removed this:
:Léonce Crenier, the erstwhile anarchist turned Benedictine Monk who promoted the concept of precarity, came from Ceton, near here.
as the Ceton in question is near a different Séez/Sées in Normandy. To add to the confusion, the Norman town is spelt "Séez" by the Church but "Sées" by the civil authorities. --Picapica (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Séez (Savoie) and Séez/Sées (Orne)
Talk:Ballons

message: i love ballons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BALLONS ARE ASOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.34.250 (talk) 14:48, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SMS Kronprinz

message: Was 45 million Goldmarks expensive compared to the average construction cost of other German battleships at the time? P. S. Burton  (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Each subsequent class of battleships were increasingly more expensive, so in vague terms, more expensive than the Kaisers but cheaper than the Bayerns. IIRC, the Nassau class battleship, Helgoland class battleship, etc. articles should have their respective costs included. If not, I can add them later - I'm at work at the moment. Parsecboy (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  45 million Goldmarks 
Talk:Arrondissements of Lyon

message: I've decided to create a portal of Lyon (Portal:Lyon, It's the first time I'm creating a portal and in English so it will be long =). The french wikipedia portal is Portail:Grand Lyon
If you want to help me on this difficult task you are welcome. Lulu97417 (talk) 01:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Lyon]]
Talk:Beyond All Sense 2005

message: This long section of material was in the article.  It's written in first person.  If it's a quote then we have CV concerns and if it's not then we have COI concerns. RJFJR (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from article space
Talk:Col de la Madeleine

message: The height given in the article is 1,993 m., which is that used in the French, German and other wikipedias. This is confirmed by the Climb by Bike website and also the Michelin map of the area. Why then does the sign at the summit say 2,000 m., which is the height currently quoted by the TdF website? --  Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 18:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height
Talk:Évian-les-Bains

message: There are no accents on capital letters in French, so this should be moved to Evian-les-Bains, and in the article it should be written Evian, even if there were an accent, if written all in lower case. Kraxler 16:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an accent on the name, even if it is sometimes left off for stylistic reasons. There is a growing trend to writing accents on capitals in French, especially as they are getting easier to do on computers. Quebec tends to write the accents on capitals more than France does. For a reference work like Wikipedia, it's much better that the "proper" spelling is used. Canadiana (talk) 21:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: > Evian mineral waters revealed astonishing curative qualities and the waters began to be used for medicinal purposes.
Seriously astonishing curative qualities? What is it talking about? What medicinal purpose is this magic voodoo water used for? Evan Carroll (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed this. I found the page via the Evian water company, and this curative talk and reference to studies, without sources, is extremely misleading. 99.198.218.174 (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this even mean 
Talk:Fruttero & Lucentini

message: I created this "Fruttero & Lucentini" article. I am not opposing in principle to a merging, but I deemed it useful to have this as a separate article, as most of Carlo Fruttero and Franco Lucentini's books were written together, and a reader could just know them as "Fruttero & Lucentini" (or even "F. & L.", which redirects here).
Consider this article as a kind of redirect; otherwise, whom should we redirect to? To one of the two, arbitrarily? --Goochelaar 11:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Geometry pipelines

message: What's with the plug for the (my opinion withheld) Reality Engine? :) - Sajt 11:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Carbyne

message: Not mentioned in article. 86.130.41.222 (talk) 13:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "ethylidyne" redirect here? 
Talk:Animax Taishō

message: As this is the English encylopedia and article names are meant to be the most commonly used English terms should Animax Taishō redirect to Animax Awards and not the other way around? Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect the wrong way around? 

message: The last listed is the 2007 award! I know that there was at least one more, in 2008. CFLeon (talk) 07:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates?
Talk:Carminic acid

message: Is carminic acid the same as E120? I ask because Smarties have said they have no E numbers yet they have carminic acid which is another name for Natural Red 4 - which is another name for E120 - can someone clarify - Are smarties not telling the truth?
Breed3011 09:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are one in the same TigerERTH4303 (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  E120 

message: More recent references are still being looked for.
TigerERTH4303 (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Cefazolin

message: The structure lacks stereochemistry. The name sis 
(6R,7R)-3-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-8-oxo-7-{[(pyridin-4-ylsulfanyl)acetyl]amino}-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid
and the structure should be adjusted to include stereo--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC Name and Structure 

message: Group 22 changes:
-Lead: added trade name, moved mechanism of action into its own section.
-Medical uses: added bulleted list of indications for infections, reduced surgery prophylaxis to single statement (there were no references for timing).
-Bacterial susceptibility: removed MIC range, separated by gram negative and gram positive, and added statements.
-Special populations: section added; then added neonates, elderly, and changes to pregnancy subsections.
-Mechanism of action: section added.
-Adverse events: added caution for patients experiencing bloody stools.
-Brands: removed section.
MeyerC G22 (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added sections and references 

message: It can be used for both pneumonia and endocarditis occasionally per the reference.
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Uses

message: — Assignment last updated by JustinxLane (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Spring 2023
Talk:Ceftriaxone

message: Who says the injection is painful and you cant use your leg for 3 hours?  That is a strong statement not to be sourced.  I never heard that anywhere. --- ok (update) I went and had the injection and it was quite painful (was on here the day before researching it)...I made the details a little more clear about this since it is literally nowhere on the internet.  People should be prepared!!
Editing the statement out until it can be justified. Muuon (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side effects 

message: I'm currently receiving this in a German Hospital via IV.  It's spelled without a terminal e here.  Might be worthwhile noting that, for people doing searches.
Regarding the "painful" comment - that's probably to be expected, isn't it, if the pH is 6.7.  I did notice that when the drip started I could feel a very slight burning sensation (though nothing I could really call painful).
Andrew (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ceftriaxon

message: §  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.247.33 (talk) 06:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  drug interaction between quinine and rocephine 

message: Could you pls  explain  the
  maximum amound of diluent  can be added to Ceftriaxone 1Gm for I V infusion to reduce pain and other discomfort  during infusion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.72.17.30 (talk) 12:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could you pls  explain the maximum amound of diluent  can be added to Ceftriaxone 1Gm for I V infusion to reduce pain and other discomfort  during infusion.   

message: We updated all of the following sections:
1 Medical use
1.1 Spectrum of activity
1.2 Available Forms
1.3 Uses in Specific Populations
1.3.1 Pregnancy
1.3.2 Breastfeeding
1.3.3 Neonates
1.3.4 Elderly
2 Adverse effects
2.1 Contraindications
3 Mechanism of action
4 Pharmacokinetics
5 Chemistry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwaves 7 (talk • contribs) 07:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Edits by Group 7 

message: This "Due to cross-allergenicity, people who have experienced anaphylaxis to penicillins are advised not to receive cephalosporins."
Is not really true. If they have had a minor reaction they can per  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your comment! The lead has been updated to reflect that information. - Group 7 7jmv (talk) 04:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: In this edit I fixed the typo (should have been developing world rather than developed world). Updated the source to the 2015 data. And adjusted the text to indicate the amount rather than a "dose". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:10, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Price update

message: . 2C0F:FC89:10F:6444:46E5:B8:4D2E:7F34 (talk) 06:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the brand and generic name of ceftriaxone?
Talk:List of Future Boy Conan episodes

message: Hello Ganryuu, I see that you corrected my correction "1978-09-26" of episode 22 back to "1978-09-25".
I guess I know why - also in my booklet in the Japanese DVD memorial box from 1997 this date (September 25th, 1978) is written.
However I strongly assume that this is just a printing mistake: all episodes of Mirai Shounen Conan
were aired on Tuesday afternoon, why should only this episode have been aired on a Monday ??
Do you know anything about such an extraordinary program shift of one complete day backward ??
--Allgaeuer 02:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, each of the references I've looked at states that episode 22 aired at September 25, 1978, such as the official booklet you mentioned, as well as the expansive source referenced at the end of the article: 未来少年コナン：放映データ where it is also stated as such. All of the air dates and other related details have been added to the article per the reference, and per the policy on verifiability and attribution that's what should be noted. ···巌流? · Talk to Ganryuu 06:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So then on that Tuesday afternoon (September 26th, 1978) the speaker at NHK must have announced to all kids watching TV and expecting to see Conan at the usual time: "sorry kids, but by some reason we had to shift the airing of Conan to YESTERDAY ..." ?? Well I'm pretty sure that this is nothing but an "official typo" - if I have a chance during my next stay in Japan to ask somebody at NHK about this historic event, I'll try to get some evidence about it ;-)   --Allgaeuer 15:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air date of episode 22
Talk:Cementite

message: Since carbide ion is 4- (when there is one carbon), what are the charges on the 3 Fe ions? Are they +1,+1 and +2? Or is there an error?RSido 01:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not convinced that you can assign clear oxidation numbers to the atoms in this structure. You might as well assign 0 to all atoms and think of it as an alloy! --Itub 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See my formula. -lysdexia 11:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charge of Fe? 

message: There is no mention of the composition in terms of percentage weight of carbon and iron for cementite in eutectoid structures. This is a pretty important number for applications in material science, the application with which information abut this substance is primarily concerned. I just think if people are looking up this article, it may very well be to find this value (its the reason I looked it up). Anyone have any thoughts regarding this? If no one has any complaints I'll add it within a day or two.Tracorn (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition in Weight Ratios 

message: Does anyone have some information on how cemetite reacts with acids on dissolution of steel. Will there be a carbon residue? Will it form methane? Will oxidizing acids convert it to carbon dioxide?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction with acids 

message: After research, i could not find the volumic mass of Fe3C anywhere. Could someone please indicate it ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.83.11.66 (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass of Fe3C ? 

message: Hidden carbon in Earth’s inner core revealed by shear softening in dense Fe7C3
:Bin Chen, Zeyu Li, Dongzhou Zhang, Jiachao Liu, Michael Y. Hu, Jiyong Zhao, Wenli Bi, E. Ercan Alp, Yuming Xiao, Paul Chow, Jie Li. 
:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014; 201411154 
:DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411154111
2.98.241.120 (talk) 06:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earth's inner core contains significant iron carbide, suggests study 