Talk:Patriarch of Antioch

message: This Talk page originally redirected to Talk:List_of_Patriarchs_of_Antioch, which is very confusing, since there are separate pages for Patriarch of Antioch and List of Patriarchs of Antioch.  I fixed.  --Jfruh 23:55, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: :ACTUALLY PATRIACH OF ANTIOCH IS THE SUCCESSOR OF ST. PETER. THE HEAD OF THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IS THE PATRIARCH OF ANTIOCH. THESE ROMAN POPES AND PATRIARCH OF CONSTANTINOPLE HAVE GOT IMPORTANCE ONLY FROM THE SUPPORT OF ROMAN AND BYZANTAINE EMPERORS. THEY TRIED TO DESTROY THE PATRIARCH OF ANTIOCH.
::Silly me. I thought that Jesus Christ was head of the whole Christian church. Majoreditor 17:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Head

message: The author writes that "The Antiochene church was a centre of Christian learning, second only to Alexandria. In contrast to the Hellenistic-influenced Christology of Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinople, Antiochene theology was greatly influenced by Rabbinic Judaism and other modes of Semitic thought."
Does he have doctrinal/theological examples of how Antiochene theology was "greatly influenced by Rabbinic Judaism" and would therefore differ from Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinope? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.195.60.250 (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a one-sentence explanation of the supposed Semitic influences behind Antiochene theology: the transcendent unity of the Divinity can produce adoptionism among extremists, and led to the dyophysite view of Christ. — Gareth Hughes (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence

message: The opening of the article identifies the Syriac Catholic Church as "non-Chaldeconian."  I know this church is a descendent of the Syriac Church that broke with the main body of Christians after the Council of Chaldecon, and that the Christological controversies of the early church councils were of less important by the time this group re-established communion with Rome. But surely the Catholics haven't abandoned Chaldecon, and surely Syriac Catholics would have had to affirm it as well before they could re-enter communion with Rome?  My understanding about these Uniate Eastern churches is that, while they are permitted to keep their own ritual and practices, they had to conform their theology to Rome.  Does anyone know more on this? --Jfruh (talk) 07:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't help on WP:RELY ref but you have to be right. Thanks for catching this. They probably did not care for Chalcedon prior to their reconciliation in 1791 or whatever. But they would have to support it after that. Student7 (talk) 01:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Syriac Catholics non-Chaldeconian?

message: A respected editor changed some of the words which seemed to indicate that the Patriarchs suddenly became aware of their churches in their backyard. But they were elected to these posts for a thousand years or more and simply continued doing whatever they were doing in respect to their charges. The one major change is that they stopped talking to each other formally and stopped coordinating religious decisions. Student7 (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: East West split

message: When the bishop of Antioch took the title of "Patriarch"; It is not mentionned in the article.--Vagrand (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The first official use of the title of "Patriarch" (Πατριάρχης) was until the 451 in the Council of Chalcedon.--Vagrand (talk) 21:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop of Antioch 

message: IT should be mentioned that none of the people claiming to be Patriarch of Antioch actually LIVES in Antioch.Ericl (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we want a chronicle of that separately? This varied with politics. I suspect, but do not know, that the Orthodox Bishop probably lived there until the Turkish split after WWI. Maybe the last one? Student7 (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did the Bishop/Patriarch of Antioch stop Living there?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Patriarch of Antioch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030417235752/http://www.kwtelecom.com/heraldry/lazarus/history.html#T5 to http://www.pgc-lb.org/english/index.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Patriarchate of Antioch (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Please help: Talk:Syriac_Orthodox_Church#Help_needed. PPEMES (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed with [[Syriac Orthodox Church]] 

message: When I have looked for the "patriarch of Antioch" in other sources, the results generally focus on the Greek Orthodox patriarchs. Encyclopedia of World Religions calls his flock the "largest Arab Christian church in the Middle East." Yet the Greek Orthodox leader is not even the patriarch listed first here. This is a very long article to have only four sources. All four are used to make tangential points. None of them cover the patriarchy as a subject, much less justify covering it in this way. The article is going five different directions when hierarchy and priorities would make it easier to follow. Colin Gerhard (talk) 01:52, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *That's not what NPOV means. Our coverage should reflect coverage in the sources: "Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources." (WP:UNDUE) Britannica has two articles on this subject, one on the Greek Orthodox patriarch and the other on the Syriac Orthodox patriarch. On Encyclopedia.com, "Patriarch of Antioch" "Syriac Orthodox" gave me four results compared to 36 for "Patriarch of Antioch" "Greek Orthodox". The Maronite leader is usually called the "Maronite patriarch" and thus doesn't come up when you search for "patriarch of Antioch." Colin Gerhard (talk) 08:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  So many patriarchs 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion