Talk:The Eleventh Hour (book)

message: :Image:Bk elevn.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 10:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bk elevn.jpg

message: This article has a template and category implying that it won a COOL Award, but no direct claim in the article and no reference to that fact. Is such a reference available, or should the template and category be removed? -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  COOL Award

message: Many years ago, I noticed the similarity between this page's main title, The Eleventh Hour (book), and the book "11th Hour," part of a well-known murder series by James Patterson. Both have similar names, and both are mystery novels. To avoid confusion, I renamed the title of this article to The Eleventh Hour (children's book), and pointed The Eleventh Hour (book) to the DAB for The Eleventh Hour. About a week ago  moved the page over the original title. I do not see any discussion about the change. I note that searching for "eleventh hour james patterson" returns over one million results, while "eleventh hour graeme base" returns 600,000 results. While not definitive, per WP:TITLE, this is a good test. Similarly, on Google Books, it is 22,300 vs. 1,010, and on Google News, 2,920 vs. 286. I would argue that the reversion should be undone. I could make the argument that (book) should point directly to the article on Patterson's book (via redirect). Recognizing the difference in stylings (Patterson's does not prefix "The," and uses numeric titling instead of spelling out Eleventh), that did not seem appropriate to me. The primary goal of selecting between competing articles for a title is to have readers find what they expected without surprising results, and I believe my work back in 2013 does that better than the current setup. I can understand the competing argument, but unless it builds strong support, the long-established status quo is also a factor. Dovid (talk) 15:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the books have different titles (one contains "the" and one doesn't), there's no need for additional disambiguation in the form of "children's book" vs. "book". That said, am "about" hatnote seems in order for this page. AJD (talk) 19:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

text: Pinging  who requested the technical move so they can provide any additional input. -- Dane talk  22:06, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of title