Talk:Murder of Brian Glick

message: I think this article could be even further catagorized in to a "Minnesota Crime" catagory, but one doesn't exist yet. I'll propose making one when I got more time. There are a number of other articles on wikipedia that could fit in the proposed catagorey.
User:Dave Straub 
Hey, go for it. You are making some really solid edits to Wiki. I might pull some stuff from the article since it really doesn't click with the murder (i.e. strong migranes), unless you can clarify it. Yanksox 22:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minnesota crime category 

message: One, it's really hard to proclaim you have expertise when we're essentially on this whole Wiki, just a bunch of words. I'm a history major myself, but this is really something that could be strongly considered a memorial. What is the significance? What makes this notable? That's all I am saying. The Google test is not the main method of finding information out. It's just a way that scratches at the surface. And when something is notable, it does the trick. When something isn't notable, well...that's when the google test comes in handy. Yanksox 13:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I'm deeply worried about this article violating WP:NOT specifically, memorials. IN the redirect of Brian Glick, Dave Straub said this is a local thing. I have no found any google hits for this murder. That might have something to do with the year, bur if that was a notable death it would have been readily available somewhere, at least on a local newspaper. I can't find it ANYWHERE. I'm troubled by this. I would love to hear some opinions and definitely something proving me wrong. Thanks, Yanksox 12:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concern

message: Um, well, if you organize if nicely on the top or bottom, people will be attracted to it. It's a bit of my fault that this talk is sort of disorganized. Yanksox 14:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: There are a few statements that are somewhat iffy in staying in this article. Not in importance, but in keeping a neutral POV. I'll post them up and help you out with them. Yanksox 14:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article itself

message: Why isn't this article under the more simple title "Brian Glick"? We should only have additional info. in parentheses, like (murder victim), if there's a disambig necessary. -Phoenixrod 18:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally the article's title was just "Brian Glick", but there was a disagreement about whether or not there should be a Brian Glick article so the name was changed several times until the the current title was settled. I'd support changing it back to just "Brian Glick." --David Straub 07:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll put in a move request, years later.... -Phoenixrod (talk) 07:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not moved and should not be moved from the current title of Murder of Brian Glick. This article isn't just about Brian Glick; it is about a callous fast-food store robbery in which Brian Glick was murdered for a paltry sum of money. The only reason there is a Wikipedia article about him is the very fact he was murdered in that robbery. This is what makes the event notable. Unfortunately, most rest of Brian's life, that was so cruelly cut short, is not very relevant to the crime and does not even need to be mentioned, as it would clutter up the article. The title describes the notable event that shocked the city in which it occurred. Apologies if this sounds unsympathetic and harsh, but that is a consequence of Wikipedia policies. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: I thought mentioning that Brian was murdered in the course of a robbery that netted $152 worth mentioning in the lead summary. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 05:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title