lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Madhu Koda

message: I understand that there are two different possible versions of this name. While I understand Luckydhaliwal's point that the government website uses Kora, as far as I can see, every news story uses Koda. Why? What is going on here? How can every single newspaper be wrong? Is it not possible that the government website is wrong? Or is it that there are multiple different ways to spell his name? We need to figure out what is happening with the multiple names. Per standard Wikipedia practice, while we attempt to make that determination, the article needs to stay at the old name. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This sheds some light on the issue: . It says that the name is Koda, but is pronounced Kora. As a general rule we need to stay with the name used in most sources. Is there, perhaps, any evidence that he officially changed his name to Kora? Qwyrxian (talk) 11:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The truth is that the letter ड़ doesn't correspond exactly to neither 'r' nor 'd'. It is a sound not used in English, try putting your tongue way back and do a rolling 'lll-rrr-aaa' sound. It is often transcribed as 'd', since the Devanagari letter is based on the letter ड (which is closer to 'd'). For me, having the article at Madhu Koda is fine with a redirect from Madhu Kora. --Soman (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

text: True, but we use what reliable sources use...and it appears that all of the newspapers in India, who, I'm sure, are well aware the pronunciation issues, have chosen to use the 'd' as a transliteration. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name 

message: Hagennos (talk) 04:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged Content from Madhu Koda Mining Scam
Talk:Samuel Scheidt

message: In this article it is written that his death date was March 24, 1654. However, his dateh also apper in the year 1653. Does someone has other references to his death date? Thanks, WhatWasDone (talk) 13:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the 1980 Grove and the recent Grove online articles have 1654, as does Slonimsky.  1653 must be a mistake; I corrected it there.  Thanks, Antandrus  (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. By the way, what is the Grove? WhatWasDone (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The New Grove.  It's the most comprehensive music reference work in the world, in any language.  The current version is 29 fat volumes, but most of us use the online (subscription) version.  Antandrus  (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. WhatWasDone (talk) 13:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date
Talk:Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Viktor Ishayev

message: I Google'd Viktor Ishayev and I can't find much other than news articles. There is little other information, and 99% of it is either on the Wiki here, or is from this Wiki. The information, however, I don't think needs citation. It's like citing sources when saying "President George W Bush was elected in 2004". It's not something that really needs a reference, is it?
ChristopherEdwards 17:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing the sources needed tag. Nobody seems to have a problem with what I said above; again there is much of a need for sources with the information given. ChristopherEdwards 18:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Much Out There
Talk:Johann Hermann Schein

message: We never call this composer Johann Schein, so I think the article should be renamed. Thoughts? Rp (talk) 19:11, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: After some Googling, I'm not convinced those who omit it are musicians or familiar with his work. By your second argument, Wikipedia should have an article Wolfgang Mozart - googling for that unambiguously points to articles about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, with his Wikipedia article as my #1 hit. Rp (talk) 15:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, most Wikipedias offer him a middle name, including German, and practically everybody then was Johann. Let's do the same. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, I agree too -- as the author of the original article, not that it matters -- not sure why I left the middle name out. He's Johann Hermann Schein. Antandrus (talk) 16:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  done ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great! Rp (talk) 09:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  rename to Johann Hermann Schein?
Talk:Vilma Santos

message: Immediate editing must be done to include an Infobox (for a picture of Vilma Santos use a fair rationale copyright to avoid deletion). Also the awards, citations, and trivia section are indiscriminate in choosing information. Please compress the information to paragraph format instead of listing them all down. Berserkerz Crit 10:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox needed and better information output 

message: ...all seasons? --Howard the Duck 17:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star for or star of... 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved.
Opposition is unanimous.(non-admin closure)  Havelock Jones (talk) 08:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Vilma Santos →  – WP:NAMECHANGES. Preferred name based on instagram. news sources, , . Showiecz (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 September 2021 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
Moved. Revert undiscussed page move. Closed per request below. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 16:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Vilma Santos-Recto →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE. Last 2022, the page was suddenly renamed to Vilma Santos-Recto without a valid reason, that's why I plan to have the title back to just "Vilma Santos". RMXY (talk • contribs) 13:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Women's History has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Tambayan Philippines has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Politics has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

text: I have reverted this back to Vilma Santos on procedural grounds. An old RM was done and there was unanimous opposition to moving it. If this will be moved to "Vilma Santos-Recto", it has to be via RM. I do not know how to close discussions can somebody else do that? Howard the Duck (talk) 15:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 January 2024
Talk:Shuttle Amateur Radio Experiment

message: The article has been expanded along the lines proposed earlier, except legal considerations has been replaced with special FCC regulations that apply to SAREX operations. Before publishing this article, I deleted the table of general shuttle information, which seemed not to belong to this article focusing solely on SAREX. We would appreciate it if someone could remove the templates associated with stub status (or inform us whether we should simply delete them ourselves). 
—Webster Newbold (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Webster.  I've removed the stub categories.  The students did well on this one.  One thing I was going to mention, may be a bit late now, is that the FCC regulations section really should be a summarized paragraph rather than the whole shebang.  Are the students done, or is this something they could still do? The Interior (Talk) 20:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi!  I didn't notice this was a student project until just now - thanks for the great article! -- ke4roh (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAREX stub expansion
Talk:Vincent Leibell

message: I think this article is very poorly written. The first example is:
In 2002, Senator Leibell voted against the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act (SONDA), which prohibited discrimination due to sexual orientation in employment and education. Despite Senator Leibell's vote, SONDA passed the Senate on a 34-26 vote and became law in New York. 
Is the phrase "Despite Senator Leibell's vote really necessary? Also, the reference for this statement comes from an advocacy website called "prideagenda.org" which would obviously have an agenda and does not meet several Wiki criteria. Furthermore, if 26 Senators voted against this bill, I'm sure there is more to it then the phrase would have us believe.
MrPrada 17:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel Words 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Vincent L. Leibell was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 03:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Much of the article seems copied and pasted from his official Senate biography. 
I added a couple of new sections based on recent articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bronxpolwatcher (talk • contribs) 00:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copies and Paste

message: The recently added sections were removed, based on the lack of neutrality in the way they were written and the speculation and ongoing events they were based on. --Kbun (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not remove references without seeking consensus here first. Thank you. --Technopat (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing references
Talk:Crown College (Tennessee)

message: I would disagree that this article is of little importance. It is a well known College among Christians, especially Baptists. The contents of the article however are lacking, I will do some research and expand this article, in order to make it more useful for people. Mgroop 16:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a Baptist and I never heard of it until this article was started. But I don't object to erring on the side of inclusion this time.  A.J.A. 19:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is written from the point of view of those who espouse similar Christian beliefs and points of view.  For example, "The faculty and students of Crown College agree to uphold the Crown Code, Crown's philosophy of education, and their statement of faith, all of which are based on the Bible."  -The idea of something being  "based on the bible" is very subjective.  
I also question the line "Since opening in 1991, thousands of men and women have received their diplomas and are now serving the Lord around the world" which again, is written from the point of view of a certain branch of Christianity, as "serving the Lord" is not a universally accepted idea. 
The student life section appears to come from an advertisement of the college.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.214.128.23 (talk) 03:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be resolved. glman (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute 
Talk:Noise-equivalent power

message: Could someone provide some practical examples (numerical) ?
212.25.107.145 (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

message: I appreciate that someone added the numerical illustration "...can detect a signal power of one picowatt with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of one after one half second of averaging."  However, the "one half second" appears without explanation.  Can someone add an explanation please?2600:1702:2420:A000:9D0A:2AF5:6BF3:C05D (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear example
Talk:Pierre Auger Observatory

message: About :File:Layout of Pierre Auger Observatory.svg. The FD directions are given in dark blue. Per FD station (there are 4), there are seven directions in the graph. However, documentation says that there are six Fly's Eyes per location, in six bays. So if I am correct, there should be only six blue lines raying out for the FD's axis. As it is now, the lines show a sort of demarcation between two FDs, but I don't think that is a correct way of depicting. -DePiep (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  fluorescence detector directions 
Template talk:Campaignbox Reconquista

message: The inclusion of Alcácer Quibir (4 August 1578) in this battle list of the Reconquista has not been explained, but its exclusion must be. Why include Alcácer Quibir in this list when the accepted historiography applies the notion of Reconquista to the period ranging between the first known battle between Christian and Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula (Covadonga, 718) and the final conquest of the last Muslim state in the Peninsula, Granada, on 2 January 1492? 
Should there be a wider notion of Reconquista, then the conquests of Ceuta (1415), Alcácer Cegeur (1458), Tangiers and Arzila (1471), and so many more cities, should also be mentioned, but that would require defining which conflicts to include, or otherwise we could go on and on until the Battle of Ifni in 1958 between the Spanish and Morocco, or even to the conflict concernbing Perejil in 2003. Nuno Gabriel Cabral 17:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alcácer Quibir

message: If you want a picture for this box, I recommend 100px --Error (talk) 15:53, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Joachim du Bellay

message: The article has a very long expanse of text. Subheads would be nice, and maybe some more division between biography and overview of works. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  subheads suggested 
Talk:Giovanni Pontano

message: I'm mystified as to why this page is at a Latin title. Pontano or Giovanni Pontano is apparently so called in the majority of reliable sources; I note in particular the results of this search. Unless there are objections in the next few days, I plan to move this page to  for that reason. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title
Talk:Jacopo Sannazaro

message: There are a number of cites for his death happening on 6 August 1530 – , , , .  Do these outweigh whatever evidence we have for 27 April?  --  JackofOz (talk) 13:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not make the change and add the best sources as a footnote?--Wetman (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure which are the best sources, Wetman.  I'm just curious as to whether the alternative date has any legs as far as historians are concerned.  --  JackofOz (talk) 00:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Certo. Well, this 27 April date went in when the article was initiated by a non-logged-in IP in 2003. Hazy-ish? --Wetman (talk) 03:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: The external link for Encyclopaedia Britannica 1911: Jacopo Sannazaro is broken, and I know of nothing to replace it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.78.58.209 (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joachim Thibault de Courville

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  It's B-class, but I'm wondering if it needs updating -- the claim that there is no known music needs to be elaborated, as there are recordings and other works that seem to imply there are works.  Full review is on the comments page; questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 02:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Animal mind

message: The animal mind is as complex a thing as our own. Who in Wikipedia agrees with my statement?
: I would. But animals are trapped, as humans once were, by lack of technology. Of course, humans are blessed with manual dexterity (hands, feet for those without hands) and were able to begin making tools. In the longer term, as technology and knowledge expand, it becomes necessary to store this information. Written language was the first method used and is still used today Pendragon39 19:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:160-meter band

message: Judging from the original, outdated link was to a year 2009 page in the url, and I found the new page to be 2010, it might be an idea to post a link to this page, titled "Band Plans | Radio Society of Great Britain" instead, or in addition.  This page contains a link to the HTML version (to which we are linked) or a spreadsheet version. Larry (talk) 10:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uodated UK Band Plan URL in external links section 
Talk:33-centimeter band

message: 900mhz is used for wireless stereo speakers; maybe this merits a mention? 69.141.83.105 (talk) 23:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs more work.
Some parts of the country, such as in New Mexico and Texas near White Sands Missile Range, prohibit use of this band by amateurs.  
Here are some sources of information:
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/compendium/0902.00-0928.00_01MAR14.pdf
https://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/900mhz/900users.html
http://www.repeater-builder.com/tech-info/900mhz-frequencies-to-avoid.html
added 5/28 — http://http//www.nmvhf.org/restrictions.pdf
There's also a map ... in this version:  http://www.zianet.com/ebear/New_Mexico_33_cm_Restricted_Area.pdf
;Bear (talk) 21:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs info about restrictions in certain areas.
Talk:Sulfurated potash

message: Hello, I am new to Wikipedia in the sense that I have never edited a page before, but I would like to contribute a Link to Sentury Reagents, Inc.'s MSDS page for Sulphurated Potash. I found it for some work related stuff. Here is the URL  http://www.senturyreagents.com/sulfurated_potash_msds.htm—Preceding unsigned comment added by Grendol (talk • contribs) 
:Hi, and welcome!  In principle you can add the link at the appropriate place (for more information on external links, I suggest you read WP:EL, there are certain links that some people cannot add).  I think this link may be appropriate on this page.  
:I am working on the external links in all the chemical pages, where I am trying to implement a specialpage, that can be called with compound identifiers (see here, the result should be similar to special:booksources).  So I do suggest that you add the link to wikipedia:Chemical sources, otherwise your link may be deleted when the other specialpage is up-and-running (I will go through all chemical pages after that has happened.
:Hope to see you around!  --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I propose to merge this article with K2S, and include a separate section in K2S on "liver of suflur".--Smokefoot 15:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with K2S
Talk:Valko Chervenkov

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:40-meter band

message: The admonishment at the top of the page is factually incorrect.  Amateur radio isn't divided into "northern" and "southern" hemispheres.  All three regions include both northern and southern hemispheres.
As it happens, the examples given include IARU region 1 (listed explicitly), IARU Region 2 (US and Canada are shown, but IARU 2 includes South America, most of which is certainly in the southern hemmisphere), and IARU Region 3 (Japan, but IARU 3 also include Australia and New Zealand).
The general admonishment of hemisphere-ism should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dcowan38 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the northern hemisphere and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. 
Talk:W. Wangyuh

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition