Talk:A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century

message: No records matched your search:
 (au: Israel and au: Cohen) and ((ti: "A" and ti: Racial and ti: Program and ti: Twentieth and ti: Century))
Speaks for itself, I think.  —Charles P. (Mirv) 19:20, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat results

message: Okay. This article uses the word "alleged" far too many times. While it may seem on the surface to be a good weasely way of pretending to show neutrality, the article's refusal to admit that this book is a fake, its contents pure anti-Semitic lies and drivel, reveals its bias. Putting forth this kind of stuff and then saying that it is "alleged by Jewish groups to be an anti-Semitic forgery" is like saying that some people allege that slavery was bad, or that some people allege that the Nanking Massacre happened.
In the use of words like "allege" and "claim", there is a difference between being neutral, and using these words to discount a given view, thus purporting a biased opinion. Please edit this to make it truly neutral, and to describe the book, its origins and contents objectively and truthfully. LordAmeth 09:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well its like the Scientology pages here on Wikipedia, we all know Scientology is a dangerous scam and would like to just plainly say it, but they have their minions here on Wikipedia being sticklers for the rules. Same goes for the many-faceted conspiracy subculture, just look at the other people in this talk complaining, calling it real, etc. Maybe sourcing more definitive evidence regarding the hoax would reduce the number of alleges? LamontCranston 16:04, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Perhaps someone should have caught this before, but there is no Thomas Abernathy from Miss. listed in the bio dictionary of congress. Sure it wasn't Rankin?--Dudeman5685 (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: problem solved--Dudeman5685 (talk) 17:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Thomas Abernathy 

message: "A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century is an antisemitic hoax promoted by Eustace Mullins" ~ Wikipedia
How stupid do you think we are??? Eustace Mullins wasn't even born in 1912, according to WIKIPEDIA Eustace Mullins was born in 1923!!! And you wonder why nobody donates to your pathetic pack of Lies??? Wikipedia has ZERO credibility!!! I wonder how much you payed Google to have Wikipedia results appear as the FIRST result??? Shameless Liars spreading PROPAGANDA!!! Read your Bible, see what happens to LIARS!!! "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death." - Revelation 21:8
I think what is being indicated here is that Mullins wrote the paragraph in the 1950s and backdated it to 1912. This has happened before with other hoax documents, like the famous Donation of Constantine.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eustace Mullins wasn't even born in 1912 

message: Should this be merged into Mullins' article? buidhe 08:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No. There's a lot of useful, specific information here for people who don't care about Mullins per se. The article should be expanded. Jayjg (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge