Talk:.me

message: The decision on this should have been made nearly a year ago, any information on montenegro? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.243.71.250 (talk • contribs).
: The IANA/ICANN procedures take a fair bit of time to get implemented. I'm guessing that the delegation will be done on one of the 2007 meetings. --Joy [shallot] 23:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rollout schedule

message: Heh, this makes me laugh. This one is .me, and there's a related one called .yu. Heh. (I bet that the .me TLD will be used for things like personal space,  i.e. MySpace, etc.) — SheeEttin {T/C} 01:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that any more silly than creating .me.us as a name? Me? Us??? --205.150.76.42 22:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, but I found this statement (which I may have missed before) even funnier: "This allows a two-year transition period for existing .yu names to be transferred to .me". — SheeEttin {T/C} 20:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

text: .its.me as a hierarchy for personal websites? *lol* that should be added to domain hacks and uncyclopedia's list of joke domains, that's classic. :) --205.150.76.42 14:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  ".ME! I Disconnected from .YU!" :D 195.67.149.160 (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

text: You'd think that in the age of social media and personal activism, this domain would have become as hot as the .tv (Tuvalu) one. ;) 195.67.149.160 (talk) 07:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  .yu will be replaced by .me 

message: That's their official slogan. Perhaps this has become silly enough that the entire .me domain should be transwikied to http://bjaodn.org?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd think that in the age of social media and personal activism, this domain would have become as hot as the .tv (Tuvalu) one. ;) 195.67.149.160 (talk) 07:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  .me is about YOU? 

message: .me is active! take a look at http://www.nic.me  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.130.126.242 (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 14:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active 

message: ITNews reports that .me "is now available for general use" and that ICANN voted to "allow users to register whatever domain suffix they want for their site." Does that mean that Montenegro has lost or will lose the .me domain, or does that merely mean that anyone can register a .me domain now?
Invenio (talk) 04:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: .me has nothing to do with the "any letter combination TLDs." See Generic top-level domain#Unrestricted gTLDs. .me is now open to anyone. I bought two :) --Dan LeveilleTALK 08:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Registration opens for .me domains 

message: I've rewritten the history of the allocation of .me - ICANN is not responsible for allocating new ccTLDs, as it just follows the ISO 3166-1 list, so the stuff about people asking ICANN for a particular TLD is meaningless. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 09:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.domain.me/news.php?&news=154
** In .me on 2011-05-20 22:31:19, 404 Not Found
** In .me on 2011-05-31 15:01:12, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://domain.me/news.php?&news=170
** In .me on 2011-05-20 22:31:19, 404 Not Found
** In .me on 2011-05-31 15:01:13, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://domain.me/news.php?news=100
** In .me on 2011-05-20 22:31:19, 404 Not Found
** In .me on 2011-05-31 15:01:20, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 3 

message: Just wondering if it's worth noting in the article the fact that many sites that engage in piracy (demonoid.me, emuparadise.me, ect.) have been switching their domains over to .me from .com, presumably to escape possible U.S. crackdown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.218.203.175 (talk) 12:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Any gTLD is 'piracy safe', it's the US governments pigheadedness that is disrupting what is a normally neutral system. 110.22.136.214 (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use as Piracy safe haven? 

message: The summary mentions 4 exceptions made for 2-letter domains: facebook (fb.me), yahoo (me.me), wordpress (wp.me) and godaddy (go.me).
In contrast, the Known Hacks section mentions there being 3 of them (omitting godaddy's go.me) stating that those 3 are the only ones.
The only explanation (other than a mistake/typo) is that the godaddy one was authorized by someone other than doMEn, which I find unlikely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarwinSurvivor (talk • contribs) 09:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, all were granted as exceptions. It happens. 110.22.136.214 (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  GoDaddy coowns .me so they could have influenced it. Wikipedyst Talk to Wikipedyst 12:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2-letter domain discrepency