lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roosevelt

message: Go to the bottom of the Talk:George Washington page and see the ranks for honored Americans. Are the ranks of either Theodore Roosevelt or Franklin Roosevelt located in the range from 5 to 10?? 66.245.115.51 00:15, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...And this is a disam page, not an article.  As such, I have Roosevelt Coat of Arms to its own article, and rewritten the lead somewhat.  Purplebackpack89 (talk) 19:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is too long
Talk:Helter Skelter (song)

message: Given what U2 and Bono had done confronting the IRA and other social problems as well as seeing the public in general, especially in California, fearing the Manson family, I think this was another move by U2 and company to get in the face of another "scary monster". - Kris Collino, Ed.D., LMFT KrisCollino (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Introducing the song, Bono said, "This is a song Charles Manson stole from the Beatles. We’re stealing it back." '
Talk:Reichsdeutsche

message: I could never EVER picture a contemporary German refer to himself as "reichsdeutsch" or Imperial German, for that matter. So I'm quite startled with this sentence:
Today, when referring to the present, Germans from Germany usually only employ the term Imperial German within such a discourse (Germans working in Latvia talking to a Baltic German visiting there might, for example, refer to themselves as Imperial Germans).
Xxmchxx (talk) 17:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  modern use 

message: Hi! Is this article really necessary? I think it should (maximum) be inserted into the German Reich article in a separate paragraph, e.g. Population, People, ....etc. All the best Wikirictor 20:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Imperial Germans →  – This does not seem a very common, idiomatic translation. Rather, as for Volksdeutsche, the original term Reichsdeutsche should be applied here instead. Cf. this corresponding thread. Hildeoc (talk) 01:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 February 2022
Talk:Stratfield Saye House

message: Where is it?  RickK | Talk 02:00, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The quote "The Duke abandoned these plans in 1821 when they proved to be too expensive, and subsequently made numerous additions and improvements to the existing building." puzzles me as I've seen it stated that he abandoned it because his wife Kitty didn't like/want the house changed rather than the cost of a reasonable rebuild which was certainly well within his means Alci12 17:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost Citation 

message: The article says Hampshire, the caption for the picture says Berkshire. Or is it on the border? VenomousConcept (talk) 14:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hampshire or Berkshire?  

message: "All but the 1st and 6th Dukes are buried at Stratfield Saye House"
I bet the 9th Duke is a bit hacked off then.
46.227.49.108 (talk) 10:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial
Template talk:HinduMythology

message: How appropriate is it to class currently worshipped and 'believed in' Gods and Goddesses in Mythology? Mythology usually refers to characters who are not actively believed in. Thus, we would not call Moses a mythological figure, but rather a 'Biblical character' even though he and his stories are completely unbelievable in rational terms. Slowly, these deities should be changed to other, truly mythic Hindu figures like Agni and Vayu, Karna and Arjuna, etc.
--LordSuryaofShropshire 02:47, Apr 5, 2004 (UTC)
: I'll wait on responses, but I would like to discuss this terminology and its use in the context of Vishnu and Shiva, Ganesh and Hanuman, Ram and Krishna, Devi and the other female entities. --LordSuryaofShropshire 00:46, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
I agree, the word "Mythology" is problematic – it seems to imply that Hindu theology should be more closely linked to Greek mythology (which we in the West usually see as kind of quaint) than to "respectable" (i.e. Abrahamic) theology. However, I think the template itself is kind of nice, despite having a bad title – would it be possible though to expand it a bit (for example to include Kartikeya)? QuartierLatin1968 02:41, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Me too. In fact, in Universities it is not politically correct to call it Greek mythology but Greek History : ) (recently saw an instance).. either hinduism has less credibility or less voices in support?--Pranathi 13:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Xenophobia

message: it is so so so so so so terrifying. 2601:644:9200:81D0:396F:2715:AC7C:7F1C (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  My thought of xantathobia 

message: it hurts your 👁️s so much. There for I hate it 2601:644:9200:81D0:396F:2715:AC7C:7F1C (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow
Talk:Lassa fever

message: I removed this:
Lassa fever is far more deadly than Ebola, though they share similar symptoms. Because Lassa is a very fast replicating and debilitating virus, the chances of a worldwide epidemic are small. Patients are far too weak to board a plane and spread it to other parts of the world.
It seems to be in contradiction of the listed mortality rates for Lassa and Ebola. Further, "Patients are far too weak to board a plane" doesn't make any sense. The virus (according to the article) has an incubation period of up to 21 days, a mortality rate of 1%, and is inaparent in 80% of cases. Finally, it's conjectural and missing a citation.
icambron 04:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Ebola 

message: I removed the line "Because this virus is so contagious, it has been classified as an NIAID Biodefense Category A Agent." from this section because the corresponding link (http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/biodefenserelated/biodefense/documents/cata_overview.pdf) does not support the claim and in fact only contains one passing reference to Lassa regarding differentiating it from other viruses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.91.92.143 (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical Aspects: Prevention 

message: The article says that it is an arenavirus, like Ebola. The Ebola article says that Ebola is a filovirus. Shouldn't this be removed?    Senor Cuete (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar to Ebola? 

message: I have reverted these edits due to some potential copyright problems.
Specifically "In health-care settings, staff should always apply standard infection prevention and control precautions when caring for patients, regardless of their presumed diagnosis. These include basic hand hygiene, respiratory hygiene, use of personal protective equipment (to block splashes or other contact with infected materials)" from http://www.sterlinghealthmcs.com/index.php/blog0/item/894-lassa-fever
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright issues

message: If there are good sources, we should add that treatment with blood plasma from some recovered from lassa fever has been more effective than ribavirin. 85.226.183.45 (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Treatment with blood plasma
Talk:Measurement in quantum mechanics

message: I removed the line recently added by  and removed by . It adds six references by Elio Conte. In my opinion, it is not suitable for two reasons: first, it's not an "interpretation" but a mathematically distinct approach to QM and thus does not belong in the paragraph on interpretations; second, the approach has not received widespread attention and therefore does not belong in the WP article at all (in my view), where the main approaches to quantum measurement should be explained. In any case, I think the issue should be discussed here before the sentence is added a third time. --Qcomp (talk) 13:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Qcomp These are mathematical physics papers with low citation count. Off topic primary literature; should not be included. Johnjbarton (talk) 15:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, I agree - I had hoped we could have explained that to  here instead of having to repeatedly revert unwelcome and unjustified changes, but the user seems not willing to discuss. --Qcomp (talk) 15:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

text: I concur with the removal. Incidentally, one of the papers is in Int. J. Theor. Phys., which is on my list of iffy journals, while the others are in conference proceedings or journals even more obscure. XOR'easter (talk) 16:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  work of Conte
Template talk:Countries of Asia

message: As it stands, Cyprus does not have a note indicating that it is also in Europe. Considering it appears in the European template, due to its socio-political links to the continent, and as it is a member of the European Union, should it note have the note attached to it regarding its position in both Europe and Asia? 82.45.225.4 (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The notes are used only when the location is disputed. No one disputes that Cyprus is in Asia when speaking in strictly geographic sense, thus the note isn't needed in this template. --Jhattara (Talk · Contrib) 07:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyprus 

message: Indonesia has too. Please add interwiki http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templat:Asia Reindra (talk) 04:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add interwiki 

message: A discussion is taking place here on how best to incorporate unrecognised states into a navigation template listing sovereign states and other entities. Some editors have suggested that including such states at all is pushing an imbalanced point of view. Others have made the same argument for not including them. Various conciliatory methods have been proposed, but have not acheived consensus. Editors should note that the outcome of this discussion will most likely have implications on this template aswell. For more information, please have a look at this casefile, or see the before-mentioned discussion page. Night w (talk) 04:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralised discussion 

message: The template note carries this message
:Please note that this template is only meant to carry those countries recognized by a majority of United Nations members.
If that is the case, that's fine, but then Taiwan should not be included in this list, which strangely it is. In my opinion it would be best to remove this clause, and add the TRNC, Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Abkhazia (partly in Europe), and South Ossetia (partly in Europe). 
Either way, as it stands the template is selfcontradictory and giving Taiwan undue weight against the other countries just named. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unrecognized States 

message: As I ask on the Asian topic template and bring here, I wonder under what criteria is Palestine included in states with limited recognition. Because although it's true that Palestine is such a case, same can be said about Israel and China. The three countries are recognized by most UN members, but not for all. And I have nothing against Israel or China, just in case, I just think we have to be fair and give the same treatment to all states. I'm not suggesting either to place Israel and China in the limited recognition section, unless that's what is agree upon, but will be easier to place Palestine upwards. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 19:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palestine
Talk:The Roosters

message: I don't know much about this band because damn near all of the information on the net is in Japanese. Most of this was eeked out from the official Japanese websites, but I didn't want to go too far with my guesses and conjectures. If anyone can read Japanese and would like to go to the official websites ( & ) and find more information that would be great. --AsianAstronaut 05:36, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Bullet

message: The main article currently has this phrase: "wrapped in a loosely tightly fitted cotton patch".
How can a cotton patch be both loose and tight?
2601:98A:4102:5980:801F:FC04:46E5:973A (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be something like either "wrapped loosely in a tightly-woven cotton patch" or else "loosely wrapped and then tightly rammed". These shouldn't be over-emphasised though, as it's about ball, not bullets. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loosely or tighly? 

message: Is there a timeline of bullets and its calibers that show in which year they were introduced? --93.229.169.52 (talk) 21:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline of bullets? 

message: Hi all,
I'd like to enter seek a RfC regarding removing the template at the top of this page that is dated as of 2009. Certainly, as  has pointed out already, the fact that it is an 11+ year old template alone is not sufficient reason for removing the template/tag. However, I feel there are over 50+ references, and many inline references as well, and while it is not yet perfect or complete (no article ever is!), I feel that this article has come a long way and is ready to have that tag removed. That is all. Thoughts? ♥Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk)♥ 21:30, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Multiple paragraphs and some entire sections have little or no references. This is exactly what the  "More citations needed" tag is for. (Hohum @) 01:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I do wonder though, given that this tag was added 12+ years ago (and I'm not saying a tag should automatically be removed based on age alone), but "Maintenance templates are not meant to be in articles permanently." Might it be inferred that a silent consensus has been met to justify removal of this top tag in particular? It would seem to me that its presence is not in and of itself helping the addition of any more or less citations/sources to those sections you mention at this point. I think we are at the stage where point 7 of Help:Maintenance template removal#When to remove may apply now to this article, no? Thanks! ♥Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk)♥ 18:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Templates which "need to be supported" are those that require discourse in order to resolve them. Lack of sources doesn't need discussion, it needs the sources to be added. (Hohum @) 20:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template as of 2009?
Talk:Lock and key

message: This article is two-sentences, one of which is a dictionary definition. This is better covered in Lock and key. MB 22:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Keyhole]] into [[Lock and key]] 

message: Need assist in collection 38.40.15.78 (talk) 01:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minute key S4 uses not sure
Talk:Sam Rivers (jazz musician)

message: I'd like to write an article about Sam Rivers, the jazz musician. He is a major figure in jazz, and I believe I can write an informative and useful Wikipedia article. Should I create a disambiguation page? Should I simply replace this current entry with data on the jazz musician? I'd like to hear people's thoughts, if anyone stumbles upon this page. Did you come here looking for information about Limp Bizkit, or were you looking for the founder of Studio Rivbea? Cribcage 07:04, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does anyone know when the studeo closed down?--Applegigs (talk) 01:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: question
Talk:Yangtze

message: When it was build 2409:4063:6EA2:B34D:594F:1737:FEA7:1461 (talk) 06:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of yangtze 

message: I wondered if in
"Ianſu" and "Ianſuchian."
the initial letter was a lowercase l or an uppercase I. My eyes are poor and I was long unable to realize that the fourth letter is not an f, so my attempts to check using a search for Ianf and lanf with ^F failed. Finally I edited the text and extracted the above words. It is possible to check that this f-like letter is really different from f? Well, a good-eyed reader realizes soon that Il is upper-i/lower-l, but ... it is possible to signal to a software-manager that many readers have poot eyes? Thanks for the consideration of these problems. 151.29.133.9 (talk) 23:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  a stupid question 

message: This seems plausible to me, new Standard Chinese renditions for extant vocabulary continue to enter English from time to time, but according to Ngrams the difference is roughly a whole order of magnitude, and I wonder how many false positives the latter has. At any rate, as you can see from my extra look, "Yangzi" is actually considerably more popular in English, maybe we should swap Changjiang out for it in the lead sentence. Remsense诉 23:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. That's the way the opening sentence was until recently – I've put it back. However, I'm not sure that "Yangzi" is common enough to put there. Also, does anyone say ? It's only partway to approximating the Chinese pronunciation of a name that isn't used in Chinese. Kanguole 08:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem like if people do say it, it's people fully born and inoculated post–ISO 7098:1982, which is fun. Remsense诉 09:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of "Changjiang" as an English name
Talk:Spiritual death in Christianity

message: In creating this page, I drew from my own religious teachings.  I'm not sure exactly how representative of all Christianity those views are, so if you see something that doesn't seem like a universally accepted doctrine of Christianity, go ahead and fix it and discuss it.  Hopefully this page will help foster discussion about this subject.  biggins 08:07, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: This article can use improvement. I'm being bold and giving it a complete rewrite. I will combine the separate sections into one entitled "Mainstream beliefs" as I think this is a concept that has a lot of agreement among the various traditions mentioned—with the exception of Mormonism which will be left as its own section. 
The "New Testament" section doesn't have any sections, and as of now only consists of a list of (apparent) scripture quotations. However, there are no chapter/verse references given so it is impossible to look them up and learn about the context of them (which essentially makes them useless). Ltwin (talk) 23:17, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article revisions
Talk:Banach–Alaoglu theorem

message: This showed up in Wikipedia:Deletion_log_archive/June_2003 where it
seems someone had unsuccessfully started to put in a proof.  I hope this
is more acceptable, even if it is a bare sketch. --
AndrewKepert 08:36, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: All the applications of the Banach-Alaoglu theorem I know make use of sequencially compactness. Is this a consequence of compactness in this case (or for certain spaces)?--Trigamma 18:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequencially compact 

message: It says there
  The corresponding result for p=1 is not true, as L1(μ) is not reflexive. (*)
however, this does not follow from
  If X is a reflexive Banach space, then every bounded sequence in X has a weakly convergent subsequence.
(the two are actually equivalent, so (*) holds true, but that's not clear from the article).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.191.204.239 (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consequences Section
Talk:Cocksucker

message: I suggest merging into Seven dirty words. Hyacinth 20:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, added the tag! --Dmcdevit 22:48, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm inclined to disagree. I'm open about "foul" language, but purely in terms of ranking, I'd be more "insulted" by cunt or piece of shit, or motherfucker than cocksucker. Cocksucker is like a light insult. Lockeownzj00 19:31, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends.  If used in an anti-gay context (used with its literal meaning cock sucker) it becomes much more offensive. Hyacinth 20:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to see this page removed. There is no reason for this to be here and just leaves a door wide open for trolls and vandals. I flagged it for deletion and my revision was reverted by ClueBot NG. Still dont think this, or the merger page are really necessary and would like to see them deleted. Lcsoman0117 (my talkpage) 05:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: As bad as motherfucker?

message: Like the other 7 dirty ones, it can be used in a variety of contextsSmiloid (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cocksucker" should have its own article

message: I think that this article should soft-redirect to Wiktionary instead of redirecting to its literal meaning.
Bwrs (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect for discussion?

message: ::Request speedy deletion
Lcsoman0117 (my talkpage) 05:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Speedy deletion is only granted in very specific cases, delineated at WP:CSD. I see no grounds for speedy deletion of this page. If you think a page should be deleted, I suggest you read the guide to deletion for further information - both as to Wikipedia's deletion policy and the processes by which deletion should be requested. --ElHef (Meep?) 02:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2013 Suggestion 

message: Johnsoniensis, regarding this revert, there is a discussion about it at Talk:Dicksucker#Cocksucker and dicksucker are synonyms for fellatio?. Something to keep in mind is what Johnuniq stated in that discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 03:14, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Talk:Dicksucker#Cocksucker and dicksucker are synonyms for fellatio?]]
Talk:My Favorite Year

message: The score was ghosted by Michel Rubini, but keep it secret. Michel also scored The Hunger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparky (talk • contribs) 
The romance subplot is supposedly an idealization of Mel Brooks' wooing of his wife Anne Bancroft. Richard Benjamin told me so. - Sparky (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Gloria Stuart was 87 years old when she was nominated for an Oscar for Titanic,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.216.158 (talk) 04:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gloria Stuart