lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Male chauvinism

message: I proposed the page for deletion. You can read the reaon on the main page. If I detailled the page, it included:
A definition, somehow similar to the Mysogyny page:
: Male chauvinism is the term for the belief that males are superior to females.  
Some considerations on how the terme was created. 
:The word "chauvinist" was originally used to describe someone who has a fanatical loyalty in one's country. The word was later applied by the women's liberation movement in the 1960's and used to describe men who uphold the belief of female inferiority.
A POV statement, without source, with anti-feminist bias
:At times the term has been unfairly applied to men whom do not believe that women are inferior to men.  This "playing of the gender card" is sometimes done in an effort to gain power or escape responsibility. 
A true info 
:The slur "Male Chauvinist Pig" (MCP) has been reclaimed by some men as a jocular personal rebuttal or tolerance of such accusations.
The page should be either deleted, or at least merged with more relevant page. "Male Chauvinism" should then directly lead to the Mysogyny page.
-—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Narval (talk • contribs) .
I disagree.  Since this is a term which has been corrupted in common parlance (the loss of the crucial descriptor "male" leaving only "chauvinism" as a synonym for "male chauvinism") an encyclopedia entry for the formal term is necessary.24.165.210.213 23:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: This article seems to need to be in the main article instead of off on it's own, as there's little content in it. --Pichu0102 20:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the proposed merger with Chauvinism. The articles are so short that there is no reason for a spinout article.-Andrew c 03:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems to not be able to stand on it's own
Talk:Steve Sansweet

message: Does somebody know Steve's date of birth? More info on the collection would also be welcome. --Chino 05:45, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the following POV text for the second time:
"Sansweet is currently George Lucas' yes-man, as evidenced by his recent appearance at the 2006 San Diego Comic-Con, in which he shamelessly promoted a sub-standard DVD release of the original Star Wars films (pre-special edition) to the Star Wars faithful. Apparently unaware of the meaning of "anamorphic widescreen transfer," he tried to convince die-hard Star Wars fans that a 1993 Laserdisc rip not enhanced for widescreen televisions was the best Lucasfilm and the gods of THX could offer consumers in the year 2006.
Some incredulous fans present quote Sansweet as stating, "If you don't like these discs, then there's something seriously wrong with you."
This statement, akin to trying to persuade someone to love a Ferrari's beauty after a horrible crash, was laughably dismissed by all familiar with George Lucas' revisionist tendencies."
PacificBoy 16:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV vandalism 

message: I am wondering why my edit that he lives in Petaluma, CA, was reverted? It is a true fact, and was even mentioned in the local newspaper, the Press Democrat. Wikiwarlock 01:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  He lives in Petaluma 

message: I don't think this individual meets WP:NBIO, but his museum might. I think this content should be merged and redirected to Rancho Obi-Wan when it is written. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename and rewrite to [[Rancho Obi-Wan]] 
Category talk:Islands of New Zealand

message: This category should not be a category of Locations in New Zealand. the reason is simple. All places in New Zealand have two category designations: a location and a type. 
The locations are the section of the country they are in: e.g., Otago, Auckland, Hawke's Bay - as explained in the text in this category. Items of New Zealand geography are thus divided by region. The types are the variety of geographical feature they are: e.g., Islands, lakes, towns. islands are thus quite clearly a type category.
All the islands in the category "Islands of New Zealand" are already listed by location - Stewart Island/Rakiura is in the "'Southland" section, for instance. As a type category, Islands of New Zealand belongs with all the other type categories in "New Zealand geography".
The only islands which belong in the location section are those outlying islands not in any of the other subcategories of new zealand location. That is why that category is a subcategory of both "Locations in New Zealand" (location) and "Islands of New Zealand" (type).  Grutness|hello? 
For further explanations, see the talk at Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand places and  Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board  Grutness|hello?  06:25, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a "Location"
Talk:Kingdom of Heaven

message: Hello? Is anyone going to actually explain what this is? Something like "The Kingdom of Heaven is..." and an explanation of what exactly we're talking about. It seems to be a random collection of Bible quotes. I'll wait a while to see whether anyone wants to discuss it, then list it for cleanup. Dr Zen 06:16, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Never heard this phrase in my life - please sir it not rabbinical or biblical Mike33 23:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: M'lakoth HaShmyim

message: In the section "The Kingdom in Islam", I see the sentences:
Islam holds a great estimation as the location of many events associated with the life of Jesus. From that day, Jerusalem has had a very important spiritual meaning for Muslims, not only being the first Qibla but also the mystical experience of the Islamic prophet Muhammad's ascension to heaven (Isra).
I can't make out a clear meaning here.  "estimation" seems to be being used in a form that could be replaced more readably with "esteem", but I thought Islam was a religion, not a location in the sense used here.  "From that day" is also ambiguous: from what day?  These should be clarified.
Also, regarding this sentence:
Muslims believe that by name Jerusalem suggests "a place of peace" […]
I replaced "by" with "the", which seems to me to keep the semantics the same while aiding readability: a place suggesting something by name I interpret to be the same as the name suggesting it.  If this is wrong, revert it and tell me why.
--Drake Wilson 00:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous sentences
Wikipedia talk:Forum for Encyclopedic Standards/Editorial arbitration

message: Splitting this off is a good idea. Maurreen 06:25, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: My suggestion is to use or build on what we already have, RfC, for instance. Maurreen 17:31, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC

message: An important policy discussion has started concerning ways in which our content-related polices, such as NPOV, No original research and Cite sources could be better enforced. I've made a proposal to give the Arbitration Committee the ability to consult Wikipedia users who are knowledgeable in subject-areas that apply to cases before them. Such consultation is needed due to the fact that the ArbCom does not by itself have the requisite knowledge to easily tell what is NPOV, original research, or a fringe idea in every field. Please read my proposal at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RFC#Alternate solution #9 by mav. Content subcommittee and comment. Thank you! --mav 02:40, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RFC]]
Talk:List of lord high treasurers of England and Great Britain

message: Who is "General Edward Montagu" (listed in the 1660 commission, shortly after the Restoration)? By 1660, Edward Montagu, 2nd Earl of Manchester was a peer (and he would probably have been called by his peerage). The other Edward Montagu—Edward Montagu, 1st Earl of Sandwich—makes more sense, but Lord Sandwich was an admiral, not a general.  notes the commissioner's name as "Montagu, Sir E.," so I seem to lean toward the latter. ugen64 06:45, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Shouldn't this be "Lords High Treasurer"? Hairy Dude (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I imagine. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural 
Talk:Psyduck

message: I have been considering for awhile that Psyduck's way of holding his head, and acting generally clumsey and dopey, could be a Japanese parody of someone with Autism. I don't mean to make it sound like a bad thing, if it came across that way. I think that characters like Psyduck, such as Cheese from Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends. , help children be more understanding of other children who may be on the Autistic spectrum. 
I'm wondering do you think this should be mentioned in this article, as well as mentioned in the article about Autism, as fictional characters who have been perceived as somewhere on the Autism Spectrum? I think if this was brought more to light, people would identify Autistic Spectrum qualities in a positive manner, being able to relate it to someone they like from a cartoon. -Violet yoshi 04:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psyduck having Autistic behaviours 

message: I think this should be mentioned in the anime section, but it isn't. Anyway in one episode in the Orange Islands, Psyduck's tail glows pink. A character tells Misty that its because Psyduck is about to evolve. Anyway it turns out to be false, but when Misty mentions to the girl that she said it was a sign of evolution, the girl turns her head and blushes. Now I think this is an edit made by 4kids to not explain what the pink tail is about, but I can't figure out why. I know this isn't a place to ask questions, but I'm sure someone else will go on Wikipedia for answers and I think it should at least be mentioned somehow, especially if it was something that was edited out of the US version. Mavrickindigo 17:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Tail" is a form of innuendo.  It would be easy to confuse a "Pink Tail" for a vagina. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glowing Pink Tail? 

message: https://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/billsvoice/96294771575?sk=wall&filter=1 Matthew Cantrell (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill did voice Psyduck in TPCi's dub
Talk:Islam in Sudan

message: I'm not well enough informed, but I'd like to know more about whether the history of Muhammad_Ahmad has surviving influence in Islam in Sudan?
--babbage 06:55, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Muhammad Ahmad influence

message: "of civil war, the Muslim population at approximately 75%, including numerous Arab and non-Arab groups; Christians at approximately 10%; and traditionalists at 25%."
So there are 110% of people in the country, aside from the fact that the sentence itself makes no sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.138.237.55 (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what on earth does this mean? 

message: Shari'a generally is to continue to be the basis of the national legal system as it applies in the north; national legislation applicable to the south is to be based on "popular consensus, the values, and the customs of the people." <BR>The south is gone. Separate country.--BoogaLouie (talk) 19:36, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  update needed 
Talk:The Milk-Eyed Mender

message: The Drag City page gives no information beyond what is on this page. It is their catalogue page. Please don't reinstate the link without giving cause here.Dr Zen 07:14, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes sense to link to Drag City's catalog: they release the album, from there one can get to Joanna Newsom's discography and tour info or explore related releases on the same label. Wikipedia often has more information about an album than the album article links do, that's no reason to ignore a link, and labels are linked constantly. The album is a product, the artist is a seller, and likewise there's no reason to ignore the label because it's "commercial". Plus the DC catalog entry tells us the album's cat number (DC263), that it was released as a CD and an LP, and that the LP is unavailable: all info that is not here in this article. —Tarnas 19:49, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 15:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *except "Inflammatory Writ" -W guice 13:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:MétéoMédia

message: This is an English-language encyclopedia. French content can be posted here. Bearcat 07:32, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Klingonaase

message: "...Ford's version of Klingon language and culture have never been used in any canonical Star Trek work." - debatable; Ford was the first to portray Klingons positively, as protagonists; His influence made figures like Lt. Worf and later Klingons possible.  Gene Roddenberry might've come up with the idea independently, but The Final Reflection made the idea a hit with the fans before Roddenberry came up with Lt. Worf and all later positive portrayals of the Klingons. -JJR
:In "Requiescat in Pace, John M. Ford", Eric Burns suggests that the popularity of Ford's inside look at Klingon culture, and his positive portrayal of Klingons as an honorable people by their own lights (not simply stock villains), also influenced the canonical depiction in later incarnations of Star Trek, paving the way for honor-driven Klingons like Worf, and episodes that would likewise explore Klingon culture in more depth than the original series had done. Burns details specific aspects of Klingon culture (such as a disdain for taking hostages) that appeared first in The Final Reflection and later in TV episodes. -- SAJordan 13:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-canon

message: The structural relation of pages on klingonaase and tlhIngan Hol  is a topic at Talk:Klingon_language, in the sections Merge with Klingonaase? and Disambiguation proposal. -- SAJordan 13:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation proposal
Talk:Air force officer ranks

message: For US officers, this article is somewhat confusing, because the OF scale is different from the O scale used in all branches of the US military. I don't know what OF means, but clearly OF-9 is equivalent to O-10 (US), and so on down the line, all being off by one. Sivamo 08:24, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. Both ranks of lieutenant are OF-1 on the NATO scale. OF stands for 'officer'. Using the NATO scale prevents US-centrism. -- Necrothesp 11:29, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely you are correct about avoiding US-centrism. But, for the poor ignorant US-ians, of whom there may be a number, could we have some sort of clarifying comment to explain what the "OF" scale is -- maybe a nice wikilink to a page explaining it would be apropos :) Sivamo 03:47, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Royal Australian Air Force, Royal New Zealand Air Force, Nigerian Air Force, Indian Air Force, Pakistan Air Force, Bangladesh Air Force and Sri Lanka Air Force for definite. The Ghana Air Force and Air Force of Zimbabwe (previously Royal Rhodesian Air Force) also use the same basic system, but replace Pilot Officer and Flying Officer with Air Sub Lieutenant and Air Lieutenant. The Royal Canadian Air Force and Royal Malaysian Air Force used to use the system, but have since switched to army ranks. I suspect the system is or was also used elsewhere in Africa. -- Necrothesp 11:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Arthurus seems to be a new sockpuppet of Roitr. He recreates article Chief Marshal of the Air Force of the Russia in spite this rank does not exist.--Nixer 17:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthurus
Talk:Félix Éboué

message: Despite our many pages with "Félix Éboué", elsewhere on the net I see more "Félix Eboué", for instance at . But I don't know the rules of French orthography enough to explain the apparent discrepancies. Stan 08:34, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk page post

message: Tried to find and add appropriate references for as many parts of the text as possible.  Most of the text is uncontroversial and similar to what is on French Wikipedia.
I shall therefore remove the template that asks for references to be added.
Kahuzi (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Wāpuro rōmaji

message: Re: the distinction in spelling between おう-as-ō and おう-as-ou, User:Shii makes the claim that in wāpuro style, a separator mark such as o'u is necessary for the latter.  Yes, that's a solution in theory, but it's not done in practice (because in kana the two are the same) and you'll need to show me a source if you claim otherwise.  And it certainly doesn't work for inputting Japanese: Vista's IME, for one, gives me "お’う". Jpatokal (talk) 01:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  おう-as-ō vs おう-as-ou 

message: This should show how "Wāpuro rōmaji" is written in "Wāpuro rōmaji". It would be useful if every Hepburn instance were accompanied by the wapuro as well. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 09:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My word processor writes "wa-puroro-maji" or "wa-puroro-mazi". ––<Span xml:lang="zh-Hant-CN" lang="zh-Hant">虞海</Span> (Yú Hǎi) <Big>✍</Big> 15:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  wa-puro ro-maji is how it is written, actually. Wordprocessor romaji is an indication of the physical keys pressed when typing the words (assuming you are not using a kana-based keyboard layout). For want of a better word, "presentation romaji" refers to the romaji forms that include accents (macrons or circumflexes), as commonly seen in some books. Rhialto (talk) 08:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this article this should be "waupuro roumaji" if you convert Hepburn to wapuro. The article also says there is no one-to-one correspondence between Hepburn and wapuro either. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's katakana, so it's wa-puro ro-maji.  U's are only used for hiragana. Jpatokal (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, well, can we add wa-puro to all instances of Hepburn in the article, to illustrate what wapuro looks like? 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

text: The hyphens come from the physical keys that are pressed. The word in question incorporates the Japanese "long vowel mark", which is normally created by pressing the "-" key on a keyboard. Rhialto (talk) 13:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: wāpuro rōmaji in wāpuro rōmaji?

message: How can I install wapuro in my computer (Vista) ? --Hans Eo (talk) 11:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to install?
Talk:Vanessa Bell

message: Duncan Grant was primarily homosexual.  According to Frances Spaulding's biography and other sources, he had many male lovers both before and after his liaison with Vanessa Bell.  She, however, was his only known female lover, and their sexual relationship lasted only a short period of time. It seems that its primary purpose was to conceive a child together (whom Vanessa hoped would be a boy who would inherit his father's talent.)  No doubt she would have liked their relationship to remain physically intimate, but by all accounts that ended with Angelica's birth.  Many gay men have had similar temporary liaisons with women but still identify as gay, not bisexual.  Duncan's letters as quoted by Spaulding seem to show his self-image in this light.
David Garnett, by contrast, was primarily heterosexual with a few homosexual affairs in his youth.  He could, I suppose, be called bisexual.  Spaulding quotes Duncan Grant as complaining that Bunny "wasn't a bugger" during their affair.  After the liaison with Grant ended, Garnett married twice and had six children.  Haddison 02:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexuality of Duncan Grant and David Garnett 
Talk:The Luck of Barry Lyndon

message: Thackery's novel first appeared serialized in Frasier's Magazine in 1884 under the title "The Luck of Barry Lyndon." When it was later published as a novel it was re-titled The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon, Esq. Written by Himself. Project Gutenberg has it on file http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext03/brryl10.txt as plain old Barry Lyndon, which is probably how it should be referenced here.68.118.61.219 09:35, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That is rather vague. How does the novel describe it? Varlaam (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "he had lived nineteen years an inmate of the Fleet Prison, where the prison records state he died of delirium tremens." JohnHarris (talk) 12:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "alcoholism-related illness" 

message: The work as first published in Frasier's Magazine was The Luck of Barry Lyndon, but when Thackeray revised the text and published it in book form, he retitled it The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon. (The Oxford World's Classic edition has a note on the text explaining these things.) It is not immediately obvious to me why the author's choice for the title of the novel as he finalized it should not be respected. --Tbanderson (talk) 20:38, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully in 2024 someone else can point this out as well. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title?
Talk:U.S. Air Force Reserve

message: This article was originated from an overly biased point of view in favour of the US Air Force Reserve.  It has since been somewhat editied, but I believe it still reeks of excessive POV.
I agree. It reads very much like a recruiting document.
This article should be merged with Air Force Reserve Command.  In 1997, the Air Force Reserves (AFR) merged with the air force and became Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC).  But I do agree, it needs to be rewritten.  Mikeb 13:39, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mario Salieri

message: FWIW - seems that the "See also" section is not ok with one editor - however, others may disagree - After all, according to "WP:OWN", "All Wikipedia content ... is edited collaboratively" - Further, according to "WP:ALSO" => "The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics." - Nonetheless, the following listing was deleted, without discussion, by  "User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz":
Copied from the March 12, 2015 version of  "Mario Salieri#See also":
See also
The following listing includes directors also known for adult erotic films:
Apparently, the section was deleted because it was "contrary to practice" - and possibly related to - as before in a similar edit deletion - "blp issues" - there seems to have been detailed discussions earlier about "WP:BLP" (see listing below) - however, afaik atm there doesn't seem to be anything substantial in the "WP:MOS" (or related) to support the edit deletion - at least, I haven't found anything so far.
If interested, related detailed discussions can be found at several links, including the following:
* Reference 1 - "not in violation of BLP"?
* Reference 2 - BLP-related?
* Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive850#Topic ban for User:Squeakbox
* Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive850#List of pornographic actors who appeared in mainstream films
* Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive193#List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame
* Talk:Pornographic film actor#Autobiographies and BLP
In any case - Is the edit deletion *entirely* OK - or Not? - Comments Welcome - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 01:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "See also" Section OK - or Not? 