lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Gundam

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons has been closed and the article deleted. Many redirects point at it that may need to be retargeted, but I wouldn't know where to, so I'm mentioning it here.  Sandstein  18:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's kind of debatable. Freedom and Strike Freedom may be redirected to Kira as he is the only person who pilots it, Justice, Saviour and Infinite Justice to Athrun, Destiny to Shinn, but mobile suits like Strike, Akatsuki and Impulse are used by more than one pilots as I remember. If there are some cases that a mobile suit is very minor or unnotable to the story, the redirect should be deleted.Tintor2 (talk) 01:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons redirects 

message: Was wondering if anyone is familiar with MS igloo to summarize all the episode summaries.Lucia Black (talk) 17:19, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tweaked the summaries a few months ago to move it away from what was written in Wikia. --Eaglestorm (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need help with MS IGLOO 

message: I created this article last night and will consider redirecting S Gundam to it soon. Anyone who wants to help expand the article after I move it is welcome.--Eaglestorm (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completed the article and redirected S Gundam as well. Thanks. --Eaglestorm (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Eaglestorm/List of Gundam Sentinel mobile weapons|List of Gundam Sentinel mobile weapons]] 

message: people ehat do you think about the Plamo-Kyoshiro manga? this manga sparkled the fenomenom of gumpla battles and is the inspiration of gundam build fighters, builders begining, and build fighters try. we should work in the creation of this article about plamo kyoshiro. in the japanese article is plenty of information but there is a problem with the translation. when we ar going to work on this article?  Cheposo (talk) 12:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The main reason the Plamo Kyo-shiro is not writtened is because that series is not considered relevant enough for English Wikipedia, and far more likely to be deleted within a year; far better chance would be for it to exist as a section of an article. However, it is sufficiently relevant for Gundam Wikia. You will probably noticed many Gundam articles are deleted or migrated to Gundam Wikia precisely because of that. George Leung (talk) 19:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

text: I never heard about Plamo-Kyoshiro. We need to find citations, especially enough third party sources to make it pass WP:Notability. At least you could use it in the Gundam Build Fighters article if you find the source. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plamo-Kyoshiro
Talk:TCP (antiseptic)

message: Because of its less than pleasant taste, TCP is known as "Tom Cat's Piss".
Any room for this little tit-bit in the article? Camillus (talk) 09:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not unless you can show that this was a commonly used nickname, and Googling it strongly suggests that it isn't. Fourohfour 17:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname

message: Search wikipedia for information on Trichlorophenylmethyliodosalicyl and you get a redirect to this page.
Trichlorophenylmethyliodosalicyl isn't TCP and TCP doesn't even contain it any more.
I propose that however little wikipedia knows about this chemical, it should be on a separate page and may even get round to doing this. Quirkie 19:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is NOT moderated. It is edited by the readers. If you have firm, verifiable information, feel free to make corrections. 87.112.144.1 (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trichlorophenylmethyliodosalicyl  

message: I'm a bit confused by the photo. On the bottle it says "Original" but we also say that the original formula was changed in the 1950s. The photo is obviously more recent than that. So does this bottle contain the original formula or the modern one? GA-RT-22 (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo is the original?
Talk:CFZM

message: I would not call the overnight music format 'Oldies'.  I have been listening to C F Zed M AM for many nights.  The sound is more like 'Adult Contemporary Oldies'.  There are are many Rock artists from the 70's and 80's (which had Hit singles on the Pop charts) that are ignored.  Even slower ballad hit singles performed by a Rock bands are ignored.  How about 'Dream On' by Aerosmith?  How about 'Beth' or 'Hard Luck Woman' by Kiss?  How about 'Bad Time' by Grand Funk Railroad?  How about 'Is This Love' by Whitesnake?  How about 'Third Time Lucky' by Foghat?  I can go on and on.  This station is definitely not like listening to a Top 40 / CHRNiklasEkstrom (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

message: Try Listening Online. Their website says that Live Audio Is Available, Is this True? One editor says No. Another says Yes.
I am the person referred to as having a personal issue by the person who removed my edit stating that on line audio of this station does not work. I just tried it again; it still does not work, This is the only radio station of at least 50 that I have sampled that I could not get to work. Would this person who removed my edit, please leave a line or two as to how he/she got it to work?```  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1archie99 (talk • contribs) 05:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the person in question, but I would point out nonetheless that it's not at all unusual for a radio station's webstream to work for some people and not for others, or in one piece of audio software and not another. Hell, I have MP3s on my hard drive that work in one piece of software and not another. It isn't the radio station's fault, generally; it's a software or audio driver bug. But even if the stream were absolutely, unequivocally not working for anybody at all, comment about it still wouldn't really belong in this article until, say, the Toronto Star or the Toronto Sun actually wrote and published an article about CHWO being publicly criticized for that. It's the kind of statement that simply can't be in this article without a reliable source to back it up. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to Northeast Radio Watch (nerw.com) the calls for CHWO have changed to CFZM effective July 22, 2008.  I am unable to log in for some reason so can someone please "move" the article?
64.231.91.59 (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New calls
Template talk:Tenchi Muyo!

message: I beg to disagree with you, Crampy20, but I've been to the official website of Tenchi Muyo!, and it does advertise the new Sasami series. So don't remove "Sasami" from the template. - 上村七美 09:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sasami: Mahou Shoujo Club recognized
Talk:Duke of Gordon

message: If the Dukes ever have more peerage titles conferred upon them in regard to Gordon, will the Sovereign likely hark back to the extinct ones which already were connected to this title?  Would the same go for succeeding to extinct family branches' titles, such as in Huntly and Aberdeen/Temair?  IP Address 10:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Broadly yes, titles once conferred on families tend to be recreated for those families where possible.Alci12 17:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the table, which had made the article unnecessary long, which had added information belonging to the respective articles and which had removed the dukes' full names.  ~~ Phoe  talk  ~~ 19:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 
Talk:Widelux

message: We read: whereas the 1500 Widelux can focus at distances of 1.2, 1.5,2,3,5,10 and infinity (meters or feet?). I'd be amazed if it were feet, but I don't know and I'm not going to guess. And as long as we don't know, this is meaningless. I'm therefore deleting this bit; when somebody finds out, please reintroduce it. -- Hoary 10:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unitless focusing distances

message: Well... It needs some work ! Ericd 20:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV !

message: I took a crack at fixing up the article. There's not a whole lot of information out there about the history of the company or camera. Seems like every site is quoting Camerapedia or Wikipedia, a bit of an echo chamber. - Kzirkel (talk) 23:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned it up

message: I put the F7 in the infobox. Maybe it should be the F8, since it was the last model? It's a little tricky, because each model had slightly different specs. Is there a way to list multiple models in the infobox? - Kzirkel (talk) 13:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Emil von Behring

message: the image signifying that he won a nobel prize normally shows up in the bottom, not right under his name. I will move it to the normal spot now, but give an explanation here if you revert it
132.77.4.129 (talk) 13:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nobel Image Location 

message: The link to vaccines from the words "serum therapy" is misleading and unhelpful.  That article does not discuss serum therapy.  I have suggested that serum therapy have its own page, but until such time, this link should be removed or redirected to Emil von Behring.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lriley47 (talk • contribs) 09:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to other articles 

message: Didn't he create a diphtheria vaccine in 1913 by mixing toxin with antitoxin? That isn't even mentioned in the current version of the article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 13:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 1913

message: The paragraph starts with "Von Behring is believed to have cheated...", that's typical weasel-wording. No sources mentioned either, let's delete this section. Btw: this section is not found in the much longer and more detailed German Wikipedia article on Behring. 168.103.158.121 (talk) 05:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cheated Ehrlich" - List Sources Or Delete This Weasel-Section 

message: Article states the birth name as Emil Adolf Behring, but the infobox lists it as Adolf Emil Behring. Also, the article supplies a fourth name of Emil Adolf von Behring (as opposed to Emil von Behring, as written immediately), so either decide if Adolf was still part of his name or not when he adopted the 'von', and if so what order the names should be. 85sl (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four versions of the name
Talk:Cucamonga Valley

message: I live in the Inland Empire and i have never heard of this so called Valley. Also, Colton is not near the Rancho Cucamonga area.--Redspork02 22:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All of these website refer to the Cucamonga Valley: http://wine.appellationamerica.com/wine-region/Cucamonga-Valley.html; http://www.ccwdwater.com/; http://www.josephfilippiwinery.com/press/roots.html. Fried Brice 09:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How accurate is this article!
Talk:Bishop of Clifton

message: This comment was placed in the article. Charles Matthews 19:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Khalistan Liberation Force

message: I have added the notice because this article is clearly biased in favor of the KLF. This actually does a disservice to the organization. By being so outrageously unbalanced, speaking of "brave fighters" and "martyrs," it is instantly clear that this piece, as it now stands, is mere propaganda, and not objective reportage. The result is that it is no more convincing than if some opponent were to rewrite it calling the KLF "cowardly murderers and demonic scourge of mankind." 
If the group has a case, then stating the facts - without the rhetoric - would garner more support than cheerleading posing as objective information. B00P 09:16, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral Point of View

message: @Abecedare here we can discuss adding Johal’s attacks to this page. :) CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 12:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johal
Talk:El Rosario, Baja California

message: Where is the town located? South Philly 02:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: It appears that much of the content in the article is unverifiable, subjective/biased, and not encyclopedic in nature. As I am relatively new to the Wikipedia process I will wait until I have a better handle of things before making changes, but I have been using Wikipedia as a resource for quite some time and I think I might know a questionable article when I see one.--Der Elbenkoenig (talk) 23:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content
Talk:Mm..Food

message: I don't think there's supposed to be a question mark after the name of the album. The album cover just has some kind of graffiti symbol after the name. 85.166.234.27
It makes sense, my man. It unmistakably a question mark at the end there Gabriel Texidor 05:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. as the non-registered user above says, it's just some graffiti symbol. or however it's called. Operation: Doomsday has the same graffiti, but saying MF DOOM instead of Mm..Food. Does that mean his first album was released under "MF DOOM?", with the question mark? No, it doesn't. ≤ alvareo [speak to me] ≥ 14:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I believe that Potholderz has a sample of Still D.R.E. in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.137.243 (talk) 02:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Samples

message: When naming an article, "logic" should not be used (i.e., it's an anagram), but rather reliable sources, see: [Amazon], [Pitchfork], [Entertainment Weekly], [Allmusic]
::Peace and Passion ☮ ("I'm listening....") 20:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: I thought I remembered this album being called MM..Food almost unanimously, but looking around now this article and others intermittently include a space, often contradicting occurrences on the same page. So which is it? Pixel Eater (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the label itself, this album is "MM..FOOD". At the very least the page needs moving to Mm..Food which is currently a redirect. In my opinion the page and all instances of the album should be called MM..Food, but I can't quite decide if this can possibly meet MOS:CAPS. I always run into trouble when I attempt to swap a redirect with the page it points to, so maybe someone can help me understand how exactly. Pixel Eater (talk) 14:01, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did we pick up a space?
Talk:Racial hygiene

message: An editor is edit-warring to remove Pure blood theory in Korea from the "See also" section, without providing an explanation of why they desire this change.  I have asked them to come here and make their argument for this deletion,  but they simply deleted my comment from their talk page. 
Is there a consensus here about this?  Is Pure blood theory in Korea appropriate to be in the "See also" section of this article, or not?
Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, pretty related and appropriate to keep it there. –Vipz (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of [[Pure blood theory in Korea]] from "See also" 

message: @Beyond My Ken: Could you please provide a rationale what exact sense it makes here to have a single picture stick out being left-aligned? I don't see the point, actually. Hildeoc (talk) 00:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Visual balance requires that images be spread throughout the article, and placed on both the left and right sides of the article.  In short, an article in which all the images are on one side is visually boring. A variety of placement keeps the page fresh for the reader, the person for whom we are constructing this encyclopedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Please see Help:Pictures#Alternating left and right, and note the detailed instructions on how to place images on the left at Help:Pictures#On the left.  If it were expected that all pictures were to be placed on the right, and that this was the preferred place for them (as opposed to the default place, which is not the same thing), there would be no reason to include these instructions on a help page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Note also that even MOS:IMAGELOC, which you cited, gives advice on when to, and when not to, place images on the left.  Again, this advice would be unnecessary if it were expected that all images would be placed on the right.  It is the case that the majority of images end up on the right, but many articles of that sort are visually boring.  Good articles avoid such visual monotony. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Beyond My Ken: Thank you for stating your stance, which I can comprehend to some extent, in fact. But does this really make sense with only a single image being placed on the left here? Hildeoc (talk) 23:04, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does.  With the image on the right, with all the other images also on the right, the right side of the article is crowded and badly constructed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this is a minor issue, after all, I will then leave it as it is. Hope this settles it. Best, Hildeoc (talk) 23:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

text: PS: Please keep in mind, however, that MOS:IMAGES#cite note-left-4 clearly states the opposite: "A consistent left margin creates a stable anchor for tracking through lines of text making it more readable / accessible."--Hildeoc (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image alignment
Talk:Woodgas

message: Alternativelly woodgas can be used to directly heat an external combustion engine such as an Stirling engine; one advantage would be to avoid the cleaning of the generated gas, hence, cooling down process and combust the gas avoiding any drop outs such as tar or water. Alltogether it would be one way to take advantage of the total biomass of forests and not leave 50% or more of the biomass unused or as waste.
RockEnergy 10:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Leslie Marmon Silko

message: I'm curious if whoever wrote the section about Almanac of the Dead receiving mixed reviews, and the subsequent reasons it was negatively reviewed, could cite the source(s)? I'm not saying I don't believe you, I would simply be interested in reading these reviews (I personally thought the book was beyond excellent). Particularly, I found the idea that the book has "villians" to be interesting; almost everyone in the book had a shadey or criminal past, the fact that a few of these (numerous) characters were gay could probably boil down to being merely statistically likely. -- Antepenultimate 23:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almanac of the Dead 

message: Please could someone double-check the categorizations in the bibliography section?  I am not that familiar with most of Silko's works other than the novels and the major collections. Vizjim 06:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Grattis världen

message: I believe it would be helpful if the article indicated exactly what Grattis Världen is (television show/movie/miniseries?). Lmblackjack21 10:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kirill Meretskov

message: Its a college for tank commanders (Russian Wikipedia)  --mrg3105mrg3105 00:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an "Academy" 
Talk:Jon Bentley (computer scientist)

message: Those who saw "The Gadget Show" on U.K. television (broadcast Channel Five, 7: 15 p.m. British Summer Time, on April 17 2006) will know that some of the information formerly supplied in this article was a spoof, written by Bentley himself. I think that some one ought to point this out  - Bentley was only trying to do an experiment. ACEO 11:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was actually Jason Bradbury who made the spoof entry. Jooler 09:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And actually on Jon Bentley (TV presenter). --Salix alba (talk) 15:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Jon Bentley (TV presenter)]] spoof

message: :He wrote the Programming Pearls column for the Communications of the ACM magazine, and later collected the articles for two books of the same name. He has published or presented over 200 papers. Interesting thing is, that this book presented an algorithm with a bug, that was discovered about two decades later. By that time, this book was read by several generations of great computer scientists who had worked for the biggest software companies. Interestingly enough, however, The C Programming Language had a binary search algorithm that used pointers which introduced a fix - long before this book was published - due to a problem with C syntax rules.
is it just me, or is this paragraph rubbish? what algorithm? the "read by several generations" would usually be taken to mean "several generations of great programmers have passed since the book was published", which kinda contradicts "two decades". also, i fail to understand how the last sentence relates to the rest of the paragraph, esp. considering bentley wasn't its author..--Ghazer (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: binary search '''an algorithm''' with a bug

message: * https://thefinancialengineer.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ProgrammingPearls2nd.pdf
* http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~deepak/deepak/placement/Programming_pearls.pdf
* http://idning-ebook.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/%E7%BC%96%E7%A8%8B%E7%8F%A0%E7%8E%91%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E7%89%88%E4%B8%AD%E8%8B%B1%E6%BA%90%E6%89%93%E5%8C%85/%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%BC%96%E7%A8%8B%E7%8F%A0%E7%8E%91%E2%85%A1(More).pdf
Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 21:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: ? Programming Pearls pdf
Talk:History of Bucharest

message: :Bucharesters greet the Red Army liberating the city on 31 August 1944.
I dispute the word "liberation":
Bucharest was already in the hands of the pro-Allies forces when the Soviets came, so it was not a "liberation". A liberation is only when the control of an area changes and that happened a week before, without the help of the Red Army.
The Red Army came in as an ally, that's why it was greeted, but in only a few months, the "friendly" Soviet ally turned into an oppressive occupier. bogdan 11:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Liberation

message: Not sure what this means to say. Not an English word to the best of my knowledge, and the only similar English word I can think of, "premises", makes no sense here. - Jmabel | Talk 22:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Premeses" 

message: I doubt there ever was a "mass transit system using rail cars that are propelled by a continuously moving cable running at a constant speed" in Bucharest.Axi 17:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Replaced with Trolley pole, cause I guess that is accurate. Dahn 17:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cable car]] 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Bucharest]] 

message: I did not see a link to go to the project group page or whatever. Nor could i get on said page from the talk page.
We need to document the history of the buildings still standing (the Palace, the buildings around Blvd Unirii and the Piata Constitutie...) Renebach (talk) 11:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Access project discussion 