lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karl, 8th Prince Kinsky of Wchinitz and Tettau

message: Does Wikipedia have a policy on names, I heavily edited this article having found it on 'Clean Up' If he was christened Karel should he not be known on Wikipedia by that name?  Also the page would be better just known as 'Count Kinsky', more people would find it, as this is how he was known and is referred to the racing world, (the only world in which he was famous), there seems to have been several other counts in the family worthy of a small mention.  These could be included, aso the article would be less stubby.  If so how does one change the page name? Giano 07:13, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we have many policies on names, some of them contradictory. You will find no shortage of opinion at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) and its associated talk page. In general names are translated into English: exceptions are made where this would be ridiculous. The underlying rule should be that an article resides under the most common name, with redirects from any other names. To change the name of this article, you should click on the "Move" tab (above the article, not above this talk page) and move the article and its talk page. Type carefully!<g>. What move really does is rename the page and creates another page, a redirect, at the old title. So what you want to do is move Count Charles Andreas Kinsky to Count Kinsky. - Nunh-huh 07:22, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: I have been editing the Kinsky's for a couple of days and think this page should be moved to Count Karel Andreas Kinsky, as it seems daft to change Karel to Charles, not change Andreas to Andrew and so on.  Karel was the name he was known by, I will ammend all text accordingly.  So if anybody objects to a move please let me know soon Giano 21:30, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections here. Were his parents Oktavian Joseph Kinsky von Wchinitz und Tettau (1813-1879) & Agnes Schaffgotsch genannt Semperfrei von und zu Kynast und Greiffenstein (1810-1888)? Empress Sisi of Austria's visit to England certainly sounds interesting...she seems to have been rather busy with Count Kinsky and Bay Middleton.. - Nunh-huh 21:42, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: William Manchester notes in 
The Last Lion biography of Winston Spencer Churchill that Kinsky was a sort of stepfather to Winston and Jack Churchill. He took WSC to meet Kaiser Wilhelm II and may have been largely responsible for the paternalistic thoughts WSC had about Colonials from Africa and India. 
Let me know what you think. V. Joe (talk) 01:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kinsky & Winnie
Talk:Impedance matching

message: It is described in its relevant section and corresponds with the concept. It also applies to acoustics (as likewise described). JohlBrownTFYQAbiz (talk) 16:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The concept of mechanical impedance matching is not dubious.  The assertion in the article that the examples are examples of impedance matching may be dubious. Constant314 (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the mechanical impedance matching dubious?
Talk:Actually

message: i have modified the redirect from actually so that instead of it going here and redirecting to actually (album), which then mentions modal logic, to redirect to modal logic and have it mention the disambiguation regarding the CD. i think it is more likely that one be searching for modal logic than this CD when using the word actual. i probably wouldn't argue if you changed it back, but that is what makes sense to me. --Skp2y F thorax 10:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Seattle

message: I'm looking for any help finishing out this draft article on Herschel the sea lion. Herschel and a rotating group of male sealions who wintered at the Ballard locks in Seattle were a National news from 1985 to about 1988ish due to the purported impact on salmon runs though the locks.  I've got basic outline bits but I've bogged finding more specifics and rounding out the article.--Kevmin § 16:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seattle sea lions related article drafting help requested
Talk:PKCS

message: The link to freeotfe.org lead to an advertising page. I am not experienced enough to find another suitable link, it might be simply removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F8:5744:FE00:7294:5572:3561:7F20 (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link in Footnote #10 is dead 

message: Numbers 2 and 4 are conspicuously missing from the sequence.  I assume they were simply withdrawn, but if anyone knows the story it'd be cool if the article told the tale. Saucepan 19:17, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They have been withdrawn since they became part of other standards. I have really never seen them when they were active so some history digging would have to be done. Maybe some time... --Schnolle 00:06, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's PKCS#2 and PKCS#4? 

message: PFX redirects to this article, but this article provides almost zero information about it.  Either the redirect should be deleted, or some information added here. JulesH (talk) 14:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Bump. Can someone with PKI experience hand this? I do not have enougth background to do it, but I will try in the future if no one do it. 95.16.43.156 (talk) 01:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PFX? 

message: Looking into what the shortcut( appearing in the first paragraph) PKIX means it seems to me it should be linked to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IETF_PKIX_Working_Group but I'm not sure as it wouldn't make much sense being a part of IEFT stated next to it.
UserHuge (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  PKIX link 

message: None of the links towards RSA-Laboratories are valid anymore.
I don't know where to find the new ones. 83.98.229.18 (talk) 08:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSA-Laboratories Links
Talk:Crassulaceae

message: What's wrong with this page?  Everything looks very weird to me.  Is there something wrong with my browser, or is the formatting screwed up? Jwrosenzweig 19:56, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the pictures are placed somewhat oddly, but I'm not seeing any other problems.  More specific? Hope this helps, Meelar (talk) 19:57, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I think I'm viewing on a larger monitor than most -- the pictures seriously screwed the margins and jumbled the article.  I've adjusted them now and think this looks better -- any comments? Jwrosenzweig 20:25, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: Looks fine, but then, it did before too.  If it works better for you, by all means keep it.  Best wishes, Meelar (talk) 20:27, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Meelar.  It does look much improved for me, so I'm hoping I've done the right thing.  I appreciate your helping me out by, well, basically confirming I'm crazy but suggesting there's nothing wrong with that. :-) Jwrosenzweig 20:28, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Government of Birmingham

message: I was misled by Birmingham City Council!
On their page , they refer to them as 'Constitueny Committees', and 'Constituency Offices'.  On other pages they use less misleading terminology.  Morwen - Talk 20:00, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I've moved it. Trilobite (Talk) 03:44, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:James Bond films

message: I can understand adding Category:James Bond movies to all the Bond movies, but why get rid of the templates at the bottom?  It gives context and a chronological framework for all the movies (see below).  The category page doesn't; it just has a list of the movies.  Can't we have both?  — Frecklefoot | Talk 20:03, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
Silly me, not having noticed the  template, has added my new template  to all movies which didn't already have the  left. The new one looks like this:
Silly me... —Gabbe 09:22, Jul 7, 2004 (UTC)
:Come to that, I like the idea of the Bond-movie-list template having a tag that actually specifies that it's about the movies. So I have a suggestion: add the non-Eon movies to :Template:Bond movies and  to any movies that don't yet have it, and change :Template:JamesBond to be a list of Bond novels (or even of general Bond topics). Good idea/bad idea? --Paul A 04:17, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey!  Bring back the template

message: Someone apparently merged the template "JamesBond" with the other template "Bond movies". Since the other is pretty much obsolete now, I was wondering if anyone objected (or has a better idea) to turn the JamesBond template into a template for things relating to James Bond. So far it would include:
*Allies
*Villains
*Bond girls
*Gadgets
*Vehicles
*Theme songs
Any thoughts, additions? K1Bond007 00:47, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
:I like what you've done with it, but it looks kinda incomplete without links to Bond novels and Bond movies. --Paul A 03:16, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Template change

message: Since 8 out of 23 James Bond films are in this category, would it be safe to say that James Bond films are in general science fiction? Also, since most James Bond films have a plethora of gadgets that verge of sceince fiction tech, all of them could be considered science fiction. So, we could just add Category:Science fiction films to the Category:James Bond films, and remove the Science fiction category from those films. Lady Aleena 21:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree to generalize them all as science fiction. The ones that are are already categroized in that category (Moonraker, Die Another Day for example) anyway. K1Bond007 22:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did it (per IRC discussion). Lady Aleena 07:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science fiction films
Talk:Please (Pet Shop Boys album)

message: Hi. Can somebody tell me, wich version of "West End Girls" was on the album? The 1984- or the 1985-version? Thanks! --Dbawwsnrw (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Stephen Hague version (1985). Perhaps the article should be updated to clarify this. Hague isn't even listed as a producer! —mjb (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  West End Girls 

message: I doubt that this album was sold just 3 million copies since its release 1986
It was highly successful. It sold at least 300,000 copies in UK, AT least 1 million copies in the US, and 500,000 copies in germany.
But that album was successful also in brazil, japan and many other countries  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.98.210 (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ONLY 3 million copies sold ? Unrealistic
Talk:Linguacode

message: Official language of the Federation?  According to the novelization of ST:TMP, this is just plain wrong.  Linguacode is a mathematical/symbolic language for transmitting to unknown races; it's designed around certain universal principles of mathematics and physics, and according to Kirk's thinking in the novel, even a handful of high school students with home computers could decipher it.  (Presumably the high schools of the Federation teach much more advanced math than those of today, or else everyone in the future is a math geek like me. :) )
Linguacode is not at all a spoken language.  It's definitely not English or any other official language of the Federation.  It's more like the information encoded in the Pioneer plaque. Jdavidb 20:59, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the standard language
Talk:Heloísa Pinheiro

message: In 2001, Pinheiro, who had opened a jewelry and clothing boutique called Garota de Ipanema (Girl from Ipanema), was sued by Jobim and Moraes' heirs, who argued that she had no right to use the copyrighted phrase. She argued in response that Jobim and Moraes, while alive, had always allowed her to freely use the label. She also suggested that Jobim's widow was jealous of her. I've been unable to find any news on the resolution of the case. Anybody know anything? Fan1967 00:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lawsuit

message: Falleció hoy la chica que inspiro:La chica de Ipanema. Julio cesar lopez upegui (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I just saw that. I'm sad, I loved Astrud. Herostratus (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heloisa Pinheiro falleció hoy. 

message: I'm of two minds about keeping :category:muses to this page. I mean, she was without question the inspiration of a popular song which may be popular for centuries, and this fact and its consequences take up most of the article, and being an inspiration for a work of art -- a muse -- is the only reason we have this article.
On the other hand, just walking along was basically the inspiration she gave, it seems. It seems likely the the next girl walking by could have been the inspiration. Although Pinheiro could have had a unique je ne sais quoi I suppose. I suppose it is not impossible that song would not exist but for that brief encounter. Can't prove otherwise. 
But I mean, everybody else in :category:muses had some sort of relationship with the artist, usually a long and close one, or was the actual model for a painting(s) or sculptures. Their personality and all was what was important. She'd certainly be an outlier among people in that category. And are we going to put in everyone who inspired a single song? "Beth" from the Kiss song and etc etc etc.
I dunno. I kept her in. Herostratus (talk) 01:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  muse?
Talk:Menopause

message: There are a large number of citations (38 at present) in the lead of the article.  This clutter decreases the readability of the article lead, which is where readability is most important.  While sometimes citations are required in the lead, as per MOS:LEADCITE, mostly that doesn't apply here as specific living persons are not mentioned and no quotes given.  Since the lead is a summary, citations are not needed in most cases except where statements are made that are not supported by citations in the body of the article.(MOS:LEADCITE)  It would be a very useful cleanup if someone could find the time to check where lead statements are not supported in the body and remove the unnecessary citations.  An enthusiastic editor could even move some of the citations from the lead into the body. - R. S. Shaw (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overuse of citations in article lead 

message: This section has an internal discrepancy, saying "humans are joined by just four other species", and in the next sentence listing five: beluga whales, narwhals, orcas, false killer whales and short-finned pilot whales. I've changed the text to five, but as it's possible one of the five shouldn't be there, perhaps someone could review this. —BillC talk 14:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other animals
Talk:James H. Ellis

message: The section on early career does not tally up with the facts about those organisations.
*In 1952 GCHQ was at Eastcote.
*Between 1952 and 1954, GCHQ entirely relocated to Cheltenham, but the security function were split off into the independent LCSA (London Communications Security Agency), which remained at Eastcote. In 1958 it renamed to the London Communications-Electronic Security Agency (LCESA).
* In April 1965, GPO and MOD units merged with LCESA to become the Communications-Electronic Security Department (CESD) - still at Eastcote.
* In October 1969, CESD was merged into GCHQ and becoming Communications-Electronic Security Group - still at Eastcote.
* In 1977 CESG relocated from Eastcote to Cheltenham.
Therefore Ellis cannot have worked from 1952 to 1965 for GCHQ at Eastcote, and cannot have then relocated in 1965 to Cheltenham to work for CESG.
Mauls (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: The link to "GCHQ CESG Research Report No. 3006" https://www.gchq.gov.uk/sites/default/files/document_files/CESG_Research_Report_No_3006_0.pdf yields a 404 error - page not found.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E0:3F0B:D000:1CDB:EDD:3058:8579 (talk) 10:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  GCHQ CESG Research Report No. 3006 yields 404  Not found 

message: I suspect the time lines and roles of those mentioned are inaccurate. By 1974 this was not the reality at GCHQ. His initial PKI work was in the later 1960s - and was very basic - he had the essence and that was it - this does not align with a number of sources - the RSA claim is likely too much and likely easily disproven.
Not sure of any connection with RSA and Ellis - it is worth exploring - perhaps.
Cock's is credited with PKI - at least by most authorities - Ellis is barely a footnote.
"Shortly after joining GCHQ in September 1973, after studying mathematics at Cambridge University, Clifford Cocks was told of Ellis' proof and that no one had been able to figure out a way to implement it. He went home, thought about it, and returned with the basic idea for what has become known as the RSA asymmetric key encryption algorithm. Because any new (sic) and potentially beneficial/harmful technique developed by GCHQ is by definition classified information, the discovery was kept secret." BeingObjective (talk) 03:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Dubious Section 

message: Cleaned this article up - this was a 'legacy' article - made a good faith effort to clean up and add citations that were credible. Still uncertain of some reversion recently made - education as an example, but left as found for a future editor. It reads far better and the citations that are here are robust. BeingObjective (talk) 03:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleaned Up
Talk:Audie Murphy

message: Murphy's given birth year in the article does not match the year shown on his headstone. 2601:249:8F80:7BF0:5D7:BE7A:3249:8D9E (talk) 23:58, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see footnote 1 in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth year disparity 

message: Just an FYI.  Please do not archive this.  While Audie Murphy has always been considered the "most decorated" combat soldier of World War II, that claim is based on decades-old information. Recent years and belated awards to others, bring that into question. Garlin Murl Conner and Matt Urban are also considered the "most decorated".  — Maile  (talk) 13:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most decorated soldier claim
Talk:Vocoder

message: Does the Japanese Vocaloid software series count as a Vocoder? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.122.193 (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been unanswered for a long time, but the answer is no. Vocaloid uses digital samples of the human voice which are glued together to form words. This isn't how a vocoder works.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocaloid2 

message: no mention of this recording from 1947, a novelty use of the vocoder effect decades before the other cited examples.
not even a "see also:"
why not?
duncanrmi (talk) 06:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it isn't a vocoder. Sparky's Magic Piano uses a Sonovox, which is a version of a talk box.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sparky's magic piano 

message: I don't hear it but maybe I'm mistaken, I think he is emulating the sound of singers manipulating the synth. Mirad1000 (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Some tracks by Tomita, such as "Golliwog's Cakewalk" on Snowflakes Are Dancing use a singing voice effect on a Moog synthesizer. He uses a Korg VC-10 vocoder on later albums such as The Bermuda Triangle in 1978  which is the year that the VC-10 was released. He can also be seen demonstrating a vocoder here.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isao Tomita used a vocoder??
Talk:Clayton Rawson

message: I've added information about the TV pilot, of which I have a copy.  The story is credited to Rawson, but I don't know if this is from a published story or original material -- I only have copies of the novels.  Accounting4Taste 04:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Commerzbank Tower

message: It is the only building in Europe to rank in the world's top 50 tallest.
List of skyscrapers says it's 72nd. Which is right? Marnanel 23:29, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The tower is 259 metres to the structural top. However, the signal light at the top increases the tower's height to 300.1 metres which will put it in the 33rd place. There seems to therefore be a glitch in the list as it measures buildings up to their tallest architectural point and in the Commerzbank Tower, its the signal light. I'll raise this point on the List's talk page. - Erebus555 17:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could someone use German wikipedia to extract some information to put in this articule. I provided a link in te refrances. I use google to translat and it was way to jumble for me.Alaskan assassin (talk) 03:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Wikipedia 

message: the navigation templates indicating skyscraper size record timelines were specifically designed to replace the cumbersome compiled nav boxes. having both is is completely redundant as the data is wholly duplicative.  --emerson7 07:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  navigation templates
Talk:Premier (Canada)

message: The main article already has a list with a lot more information in it, and I don't think we need to set up a whole separate page for a list of 13 items.  While we're at it, we might want to consider adding a section about how premierships compare to the prime ministership and pre-confederation premierships so that this page can be eventually used as a main article for an FT.  --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way, I'll be working on the list. If they are eventually merged, I think the other list should replace the one in this article as it has more information and it displays it in a more organized manner. Gary King (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since there isn't much activity here, I'll take a side myself. I'm going to Oppose this merge for now as I think a separate list containing the current list of Premiers is useful enough to warrant its own article. It should be removed from this article and replaced with a  template. Gary King (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[List of current Canadian premiers]] 

message: The Timeline isn't showing up properly - the colours are hard to distinguish, and both the rows in the timeline and the party labels in the key overlap each other.--82.35.251.109 (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: The timeline should either be fixed or removed. Some parties are listed more than once, some aren't even listed at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.158.37.207 (talk) 02:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: I reverted the edit that said that Brian Pallister was the Premier of Manitoba, because it wasn't correct.  He's won the election, so he will be Premier, but it doesn't happen instantaneously.  There is a transition period.  Accord to this CBC report, Pallister and Sellinger have agreed on a transition date, within the next couple of weeks, but haven't announced the actual date yet.  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pallister not Premier immediately after the election