lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Ethnic groups in Vietnam

message: Should Viet-Muong be moved to Vietic? The Chut are Vietic, but not Viet-Muong. Badagnani 10:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes – ishwar  (speak) 21:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Viet-Muong

message: Where are the Degar? Jamesx12345 (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Degar

message: There are no Thai people in Vietnam. Please see :de:Thái (Volk) or :vi:Người Thái (Việt Nam). I edited the template using Thái, which is the correct spell of the group and the page hasn't been done yet in English wikipedia. It includes these ethnic groups: Thái Đen, Thái Đỏ, Thái Trắng, Phu Thai, Tày Thanh, Thái Hàng Tổng, and probably some other minor ones. -Carlo58s (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is no Thai people in Vietnam. Actual it must be :vi:Người Thái (Việt Nam) or :de:Thái (Volk) (with 3 groups Thái Đen, Thái Đỏ, Thái Trắng only), but there is no translation to english (I cannot do so). In Thailand the most are Thai people. The differences are so: Thai people - Lao people - :vi:Người Thái (Việt Nam).LuongLBc 14:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No [[Thai people]] in Vietnam
Talk:Church of Christ in Thailand

message: Hi JayF7, I was glad to see that you added a mission section to the CCT page.  I hope that you don't mind that I corrected the English grammar in the section that you translated from Ajaan Prasit's page about CCT history.  Are you a member of a CCT church in Thailand?
--Dahlfred (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: English Grammar Corrected
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 1, 2007

message: === image missing ===
:md masum (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 15:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 26 July 2016 ( image missing) 

message: :md masum (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 15:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  image missing
Talk:Elam House

message: {falscher link: Frank Lloyd Wright - Minnesota - Austin - Elam House führt zu Elam House in Chicago }  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.7.225.193 (talk) 10:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Killer Shake

message: I have a Killer Shake shirt with Willie surfing on it. As there seems to be very little online as far as images of this food, exists and as the company no longer exists, would a photo of an image that this company produced be a violation of Copyright ?
I have two links online for consideration.
http://img.ly/system/uploads/007/869/016/large_image.jpg
http://img.ly/system/uploads/007/869/015/large_image.jpg
Michael.jenkin (talk) 04:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Hess Corporation

message: Didn't Hess gas stations have a promotion in the late 1950's early 1960's that you could get a Doll dressed in different dresses from around the world in a box if you filled up your tank?  Is there somewhere I could find out more about this?174.126.92.39 (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I sympathize with frustrations over the errors, but we need a very specific requested edit. Please identify the exact text of the article that is erronious, propose a corrected replacement and offer a specific source (preferable a credible, independent one) to support the corrected text. CorporateM (Talk) 04:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dolls around the world 

message: the HESS corporation no longer exists as they were bought by Speedway 38.21.46.58 (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  hess corporation
Talk:Oseberg oil field

message: I had not realized that I had created Oseberg Oil Field article while Oseberg oil field one already existed. I updated the latter and will redirect the former. Tuscumbia 15:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Brent oilfield

message: Here's a few suggestions to incorporate in to the main page on Brent. I'll add them in if no-one objects (and I learn how to edit pages properly):
Brent is a Group and not a formation. The five main units of the Brent Group are now Formations in their own right. See, for example, Morton, A.C., et al. (eds.), 1992, Geology of the Brent Group, Geological Society Special Publication No. 61. And the article therein, Richards, P.C., 1992, An introduction to the Brent Group: a literature review, pp. 15 - 26.
The Brent Group is of Middle Jurassic age (mostly Bajocian with the Tarbert Formation, the youngest in the Group, of probable Bathonian age). See for example Mitchener, B.C., et al., 1992, Brent Group: sequence stratigraphy and regional implications, in Morton, A.C., et al., 1992, pp. 45 - 80.
Also worthy perhaps of mention is the separate large reservoir underneath the Brent Group where oil and gas are present in the Statfjord Group sandstones of latest Triassic age.
The seal to the Brent Group is really the Heather Formation (of Callovian age), rather than the Kimmeridge Clay. The Kimmeridge then lies unconformably on top of the Heather Formation.
The Brent Group was discovered with well 211/29-1 and then subdivided lithostratigraphically into the five Formations afterwards, so these are named directly after the five letters of Brent. It's not a coincidence... They are all Scottish Lochs too, by the way, not just features.
Also worth mentioning that Brent is (or was) one of the UK's largest oil fields and one of the largest gas fields too? I'll dig out some more references to tabulate this.
I would also suggest changing the name of the page to Brent_field (to be similar to many other wikipedia pages) but also to be more accurate - Brent is really an oil and gas field.
More technical stuff later if needed.
(I am a geologist, in case you can't tell, and used to work for Shell, although not much on Brent Field itself)
Fluffysbro (talk) 10:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:3 ft gauge rail modelling

message: The three foot gauge was pretty usual in Sweden too.  The only difference was, that the Swedish foot was slightly shorter than the imperial one, meaning 3 (Swedish) ft = 891 mm.  I don't know if it should be mentioned in the article, but it might be a factual error to state that only USA and Ireland had 3 ft as the most common narrow gauge.  Fomalhaut76 (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 3 ft gauge in Sweden
Talk:Network transparency

message: Can VNC and Remote Desktop Protocol be called examples of network transparency too? --Abdull 10:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: This article appears to discuss three separate "network transparency" topics:
# Remote desktop
# Database
# Firewall
At the very least, we need to create a separate body section to cover the remote desktop topic and then write a new lead that covers all three topics. There are probably other, better alternatives for organizing this material such as merging current content into Remote desktop software, Database and Firewall and turning this into a WP:DISAMBIG. Other suggestions and discussion are appreciated. ~Kvng (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello!  As we know, the layout of X Window System separates the client and server components while connecting them over a network; as a result, the whole X is network-transparent because the clients and servers can communicate over almost anything without being aware of that.  Technically, "network transparency" in this context isn't about the remote desktop concept, it's about a truly distributed GUI subsystem architecture as a whole; in contrast, remote desktop is just an "attachment" to a "monolithic" GUI subsytem.  With that in mind, IMHO we might want to split the info on X into a separate section, and create a new lead section that would sum it all up.  Turning this page into a disambiguation wouldn't be that great. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 04:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Three topics
Talk:ISO 5776

message: :You want a diagram of a document? C'mon... --pfctdayelise (talk) 16:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that what is wanted is the document, but the PDF has a charge to get it. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request
Talk:Tern oilfield

message: I propose to merge articles of oilfield and oil platform as interrelated topics. Both articles are poorly developed and lacking sources, so merger would create a more comprehensive article. Beagel (talk) 13:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger completed. Beagel (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Bolivar Coastal Field

message: The figure of 2.6 up to 3 Million Barrels daily is impossible. Hugo Chavez said for example that (whole!) Venezuela is producing around ~3.5 Mio Barrel. However, the OPEC which got "secret informations" because of the OPEC-meetings. However Saudi-Arabia and/or the actual Chief of the OPEC said that Venezuela is producing something like 2.50 - 2.65 Million Barrel daily. But this includes very much other fields, and since this field has been discovered 1917 and the production started already in 1922 such numbers aber impossible. An oil field with over 2 Million Barels/Day production would be on the 2nd place behind "Ghawar" in SAudi-Arabia.  Kilon22 (talk) 06:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barrels per Day? 
Talk:Henry Gerber House

message: :I'd like to review this for DYK but I think the article has a lot of material that is irrelevant to the house. I would like to delete stuff about subjects that are not relevant to the house and how it was involved in LGBT history. All the history of LGBT in America is covered elsewhere. OK? Victuallers (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have sectioned those from above -- if you want to cut some, I think that is possible (per WP:SUMMARY), but it would be impossible from a notability standpoint to "delete all."  It's named for Henry Gerber, and it is not really all that notable as one of a block of similar houses.  Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to limit it when I was writing to that which was relevant to the house and that which gives that material context. i.e., I think it's relevant that the gay culture Gerber saw in post-WWI Germany influenced his decision to start a similar advocacy group upon his return to the U.S. Could we have some specific examples of what we ought to cut? Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: How much info
Talk:Cantarell Field

message: the field is so named after the fisherman who found it, apparently he kept on getting oil etc in his nets when fishing that area and repeatably told PEMEX about it who refused to believe him until he took a few of them out in his boat, i'll see if i can find a ref for it. Philbentley 17:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The fisherman story varies from source to source: in one newspaper article  he new about the seeps very long (1961) but did't bother to tell anybody. Only later, when he met an PEMEX engineer, he told him about the oily spots on the ocean. Nevertheless, PEMEX writes in their Annual Reports, that they began exploring in 1972 with first geophysical surveys. The production began in 1979 with the first field of the complex tapped, it was quickly ramped up >1 Mb/d. --Gunnar (talk) 18:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: This article: http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/frame_ntl_news.htm talks about the decline of this oil field.Agre22 (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Decline

message: A graph or chart showing the rate of decline would be useful for this article. Is anyone up to it. - Shiftchange (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the production figures from the SEC Filings (see table in Cantarell Field #Production History). Earlier PEMEX reports did not have a disaggregation field by field. Does anybody know where to find the first half of the production data from 1979 until the peak? --Gunnar (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph of decline 
Talk:Chicontepec Formation

message: This articles says that it is mainly extra heavy crude. This claim is supported by two references, but one of them is dead link and another is not available online. At the same time, according to Robin M. Mills, Chicontepec is a complex of tight oil fields  and that contrary to frequent description of it as a heavy oil reservoir, its gravities ranges from 18-45 API, which is lower than for heavy oils.   Therefore I propose to change the description accordingly. Beagel (talk) 09:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavy crude oil or tight oil?
Talk:Daqing Oil Field

message: Dagang Oilfield shouldn't redirect here!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WestNab (talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Hellbreeder

message: If you can find anymore references to this movie, please add them. There aren't a lot out there. LordRobert 11:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is not that well developed and needs to be expanded. The plot is also undeveloped and needs to be rewritten in order to qualify as a well developed section. Also information on the film's production and reception are missing and need to be added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:47, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Merkers-Kieselbach

message: I have filled in some detail of this defunct authority.  The elephant in the room is the WW2 material which should not be here. It all happened long before the authority was formed, and as the authority no longer exists it no longer is a geographical entity so we cannot use that as a reason to park it here. I might mention that it appears biased and confuses material legitimately stored by a government suffering attack and occupation- with stolen artifacts "loot". There are so many incoming links that putting this in a stand alone article will take some expert skills. And detoxifying it may take time.-- Clem Rutter (talk) 19:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separating the history of the mine
Talk:Belene Nuclear Power Plant

message: * The project was abandoned in 1990 due to the democratic changes in Bulgaria and only conservational work was done. Others say it was abanded because of safety concerns 
* discrediting letter, this sounds wholly different then  
* wording of criticism paragraph
* This might be an interesting article on Wikileaks about the power plant:   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.192.247 (talk) 13:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest introducing the changes you mentioned yourself. It's a wiki, be bold. Todor→Bozhinov 14:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The Possible project restart section says a plan was to be developed by 18 October 2018. What happened?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible project restart?
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-29 Occupation of Baltic states

message: I've got a suggestion. I have seen many points put forward by the side, which denies the fact of Soviet occupation, however, so far little – if any – SOURCES have been given by those people. So arguing with them has not been very prolific, very fertile so to say, if we bear in mind improving the Wikipedia articles (the trouble is, we can base articles on sources only: WP:V).But I admit we can make things work. Let us consider the comment by Dojarca: No. No matter now the baltics joined the USSR, since that moment it cannot be occupation, as an occupation is the control over foreign territory. Can you please learn the dictionary definition after all? or If the countries belong to the USSR, they are not occupied regardless how they became part of the USSRHave these intriguing arguments been used in international law magazines? Why have so important objections remained apparently uncovered by specialists?  Well, it would make sense, if you would publish your innovative approach in a magazine and then refer to it. I repeat: it would be an important innovation! And it would be acceptable for Wikipedia: Self-published material may be acceptable when produced by a well-known, professional researcher (scholarly or non-scholarly) in a relevant field. (Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources). This is the point when we can really start using your theses. E.J. 11:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: May be because serious historians do not disprove any revisionist lies they encounter. I also did not see any disproofs of Fomenko's widely spread theory that Julius Caesar, Ivan the Terrible and Tamerlan were actually one person. For example, former world chess champion and Russian politician Kasparov supports this theory, there are many books etc. --Dojarca 15:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like you just haven't tried to find disproofs. Andrey Zaliznyak refuted Fomenko. But this is an entirely different situation, and strong words like revisionist lies won't help you here. Colchicum 15:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I've searched Internet and found this  interesting document published on the site of Latvian foreign ministry. It's title is "Occupation of Latvia: historical and international law-related aspects". Dispite the title the word "occupation" used only a few times in the article. First time the author says that in 1940 Latvia "fell in hands" of Red Army, whih is "one of features" of occupation accurding to 1907 Hague Principles (i.e. "territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army"). Saying Latvia was occupied the author cites a magazine and places the entire phrase in quotes. Later the author uses olny words "annexation" and "incorporation" relative to acception of Latvia in the USSR, but notes that the annexation was illegal because it was "based on occupation". The article nowhere says that occupation lasted until 1990.--Dojarca 16:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latvian position
Talk:Scrawled filefish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 09:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Satriale's Pork Store

message: "This article or section may fail to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction."
First line of article:
"Satriale's Pork Store is a fictional establishment on the HBO series, The Sopranos."
ummm, seems pretty clear to me
:It says that, but the article is about the fictional place, then jumps out of a fictional tense when it says, "The pork store is set and filmed at 101 Kearny Avenue in Kearny, New Jersey".  I see why the tag is there.    It would be like a biography of Bugs Bunny, then saying something about the artist. 162.136.192.1 20:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well it is fact, not fiction, that "The pork store is set and filmed at 101 Kearny Avenue in Kearny, New Jersey", this is similar to a biography of Bugs Bunny saying something about where the character is drawn. Dlabtot 18:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  umm, I mispoke... let's be clear - WP has an article about Bugs Bunny --  not a biography.  Dlabtot 18:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was clear to me too.  Unless there really is a Satriale's.  I'd love to try their soppressata.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.3.173 (talk) 03:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ??

message: Does anything in The Sopranos establish the fictional setting of Satriale's as being in Kearny?  Or is that simply the location where it's filmed?  (This is especially unclear as it's been shot in two different locations.)  84.203.39.242 (talk) 01:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting, or location?
Talk:Marco Alcaraz

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Metring David

message: The link to Walang Hanggan is going to a 2003-2004 TV series, not the 1953 movie.  RJFJR (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Non-British personnel in the RAF during the Battle of Britain

message: Ireland was then, as now, a partitioned island so it would be incorrect to treat the island as if it were one state. I have expanded that the Irish Free State was officially called Ireland from 1937 - but also the Gaelic name Eire. Irish Free State ought to be the subsection's title, rather than Ireland which shares its landmass with Northern Ireland, which recognises the political distinctness of what is now Republic of Ireland. I recognise that the page title is "Non-British personnel" but there could be a token mention that aircrew from the six counties of Northern Ireland are classified as "British".Cloptonson (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on Ireland (section Contribution by country)
File talk:AudacityofHope.jpg

message: *:Image:AudacityofHope.jpg fair use in Barack Obama? See this edit, plus talk page discussion. Thanks. --HailFire 19:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion moved from [[Wikipedia:Fair use review]] 

message: *For Barack Obama, FUR was agreed upon at the discussion page for this image, based upon the following evidence of its necessity in the article about his life.
:*From the New York Times: "Mr. Obama’s new book, “The Audacity of Hope” ... is much more of a political document. Portions of the volume read like outtakes from a stump speech, and the bulk of it is devoted to laying out Mr. Obama’s policy positions on a host of issues, from education to health care to the war in Iraq." And from the Chicago Tribune: "a political biography that concentrates on the senator's core values." It's his election-year personal manifesto. How is there any doubt about that? How is this not one of his key pieces of campaign literature? Jheald 21:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - and, I believe, citing that critical commentary is enough to justify the image. Apparently, with the image only in place to show the book itself, the rationale was not acceptable. However, if the image is commented upon (as it appears to be), then I think it passes. UltraExactZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  17:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2008 - Fair Use Rationale

message: --HailFire (talk) 19:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New discussion