Talk:Prediction of volcanic activity

message: You are very welcome to post comments and discuss issues related to the article. If you have questions unrelated to the improvement of this article, please instead search for answers, or post them, at Ask-A-Volcanologist. Please help to keep it organised and refrain from advertising your own niche research field or individual favourite volcano. --Carboxen 20:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many edits & changes: intro, +weblinks, +thermal monitoring, iceberg tremors moved to seismicity, hydrology edited (needs more help) and amended, +mass movements (incorp. existing lahar paragraph), moved case studies into their own section. The article still needs help. --Carboxen 20:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edits & changes 

message: Hi Eve, 
Your initiative to improve this article is more than welcome (as posted on your userpage) and I couldn't agree more - it needs references and is still in some parts a compilation of disconnected concepts. I tried reorganizing it a few months ago but usually don't have much time and no one else volunteered. Have a go at it whenever you can!
--Carboxen 15:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers! I don't have a huge amount of time myself at the moment, but I'll see what I can do. If anyone else feels like helping then please do. Eve 15:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page re-organization, references 

message: :Incidentally Carboxen, I think you added the 'five principles' in the first section, can you remember where you got them from so I can add a citation? If anyone else has ideas for good references to put in the article please shout. Either refs to back up the existing content, or ideas for other topics to cover. Eve 21:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Eve, these five principles come from many years of work with volcanic hazards, in many countries and on an international level. I can try to find references that cover these, but it might take a while and it won't be one single reference. I will try to back-match the principles to what myself and others have published. --Carboxen 17:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As an additional note regarding your suggestions above: I agree with your bullets # 1, 2, 3, and 5 (references - doesn't have to be lots for an encyclopedia, but sufficient - it's not an academic paper). Bullet 3 might be good but the first type (cloud sensing) doesn't really fit in anywhere. UNLESS we open a new header for eruption monitoring/observation - since most other methods/cases described apply to pre-event monitoring. Bullet 4 is also OK I think, but I would do the following: move the Sakurajima, Japan section to the article Sakurajima, move or delete the Etna one, but leave Nyiragongo - it is a widely discussed example of difficult logistics with few available instruments. If we only include well monitored examples like Hawaii, Vesuvius, St. Helens, then the reality is not represented well. --Carboxen 17:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll have a look for general references too. I just thought since the five principles were put down so specifically that they might have come from one place. I was planning to put cloud sensing in the gasses section, and broaden it a bit to touch on eruption plume detection perhaps. Thanks for the help, Eve 17:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not sure if I am doing this right, please bear with me.  I am very interested in getting my hands on some references regarding the 5 general principles fo my MAsters thesis.  They are, very easily, the best general principles I have seen for volcanic activity prediction.  I'd very much like to use them but not sure how.  Any progress on finding the references for these?  Additionally, I am not the only one at my university.  Finding references for thee would be very helpful. User_talk:Lavagirl_nz 15:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Lavagirl, I am sorry I didnt see your post earlier than this, almost half a year later. Did you defend your thesis yet? Drop me a line on both my talk pages (here) and (here) if you still need advice. --Carboxen (talk) 17:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General principles of prediction

message: I have doubts about these general principles, and I wonder if they have ever been implemented and shown to yield useful and accurate predictions. Not a single point is documented with references. Wondering, Grandma (talk) 10:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Years later ... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Prediction of volcanic activity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080720140858/http://www.wsspc.org/Awards/2003/innovations.htm to http://www.wsspc.org/Awards/2003/innovations.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified