lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Prussian Crusade

message: This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: I am struck by the overlap between this article and Prussian uprisings. Gee, just look at the ledes of both. Altogether the articles cover so much of the same ground.  Why the uprisings? The crusade. Why continue the crusade? The uprisings. So much intertwined, why not merge the articles? Shenme (talk) 03:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why shouldn't a merge with [[Prussian uprisings]] be fomented? 

message: The article mentions that one of the earlier Teutonic campaigns was "advancing from Nessau (Nieszawa)" towards "ruins at modern Toruń" and then further "toward the pagan-occupied Rogów. Now, the Rogów which is linked in the text is nowhere near Toruń but rather near Szczecin in Pomerania. Unfortunately none of the places listed under the disambig page Rogów is near Toruń either. There are two places northeast of Toruń situated next to one another, Rogowo, Toruń County and Rogówko, Toruń County, and I assume that one of them is the place meant here. If anyone knows for certain, please correct accordingly. Proofreader (talk) 17:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rogów
Talk:Getaway Special

message: Note that much of the content was copied word-for-word from a US government source under claim of public domain as of this article's creation back in 2004. I'm not sure how that comports with Wikipedia policy. - Wikidemon (talk) 02:36, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:Alois P. Swoboda

message: The current info listed on Swoboda is accurate and can be found by searching the web. Previous posts made about Swoboda contain information that is the opinion of the person who posted it, none of it can be backed up with references or internet searches.
Whammer79 (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So prove it, provide verifiable sources for the information in the article. As a start, list them here. Woody (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

text: Hey Friends, you can't spread these LIES about Alois P. Swoboda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Memberofthegospel (talk • contribs) 10:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I have reverted back to the version by JNW which included references and where the text was neutral. We cannot say "X" is a bad person because, what we need to say "Y" says "X" is a bad person in this book because of... but this is refuted by "Z". We must list both sides of any issue, and cite it vigorously to reliable sources. Regards, Woody 
(talk) 11:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring
Talk:Oliver Ellsworth Homestead

message: I took some photos of it yesterday.  I'll upload them tonight.  
I also started articles (with photos) of various places in Windsor, CT that are on the National Register of Historic Places.  How do I get those artles rated as stub or start, etc?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissypan (talk • contribs) 16:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a little late, but... you can add a WikiProject template and rating yourself (with the same template code as on this page).--ragesoss (talk) 03:47, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: photo
Talk:Oliver Wolcott House

message: I'm going to remove the photo here from the article, as i think it is not the right house.  I'll add another pic or two which are of what I believe to be the house, and which match up better to what's in the NRHP nomination doc's accompanying photos.  I wonder if this pic here is of a different Oliver Wolcott House, i think there are more than one in Litchfield for Oliver Wolcott, Jr. and Oliver Wolcott senior.  In general, Litchfield is very confusing with many similar looking houses, all terribly historical.  Several of the accompanying photos in the 1967 NHL nom for Litchfield Historic District are labelled variously as "House on South or North Street, i am not sure" by the otherwise meticulous documenter, Charles Snell. --doncram (talk) 20:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This picture is of the Litchfield Public Library (Oliver Wolcott Library ), which is also known as the Oliver Wolcott, Jr., House. It is further south at 160 South Street. --Polaron | Talk 20:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes, I believe that's quite right.  I have some pics of the now-library one, including inside pics and an exterior pic or two of the modern library extension running out back.  It's quite nice, probably worth a separate article as Oliver Wolcott Library or Litchfield Public Library perhaps.  Have you visited there?  If anyone does, you'll want to stop by the library (or perhaps the historical society on the Green, which wasn't open when i was there) to get a copy of the walking tour map, by the way. --doncram (talk) 20:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  which pics are right, which Oliver Wolcott House
Talk:Oblivantsy

message: 'Oblivantsy (from ) were Old Believers who practised the baptism by sprinkling the water, as in Catholic Church...') 
*Please do forgive me for saying this, but this must be some misunderstanding. It sounds like stating "Some vegetarians do eat meat."
There are no Old Believers who practised of practise baptism by sprinkling. Moreover, this it one of most fundamental issues that sets them apart from the new ritualists and all other (less traditional) Christians! "Oblivantsy" is quite the opposite of "Old Believers." 
The Russian Orthodox Church started recognizing baptism by sprinkling because... Peter the Great wanted her to do so. He wanted to make the conversion into Orthodoxy easier for Roman Catholics and Lutherans. After the Bolshevist Revolution of 1917 the Russisan Orthodox Church started to baptize also by sprinkling.
Until 1917 this issue remained a cause for arguments with the Greek, who then did not recognize baptism by sprinkling either. Now they do, as far as I know. Vasilij 16:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)