lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:328th Weapons Squadron

message: Some of the edits made by IP-identified users seem to add to the commercialization of this page (i.e. making it sound like an advertisement).  While I wouldn't want to force anyone to register with Wikipedia, it would be nice to have a point-of-contact to ask questions about USAFWS and the 328th WPS to. TDRSS (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the information about the squadron might be classified, but yes I agree with you that the article should be rewritten with attention to tone. I suspect that a lot of the present article is written from a handout about the squadron and its mission. I don't agree with any possible characterization as spam.--TGC55 (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Info verification

message: Latest assignments unrefenced and contradicted by AFHRA, which says squadron was assigned to Space Command 7 Aug 2020-23 Aug 2021. Lineagegeek (talk) 00:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Assignment
Talk:Bonneville 400

message: We have more than one link to the page now.  I removed the orphan status.  Zab 10:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Status 

message: How is 400 kph a world record? How does 400 kph beat 1220 kph?--69.107.121.20 (talk) 04:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:398th Air Expeditionary Group

message: World War II history -- reference provided says Blythe Army Air Base. The home article for BAAB is the Blythe Airport. That article has an unreferenced note saying aka "Bishop". As there was a separate airfield known as Bishop, that notation is probably an error.--S. Rich (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blythe 
Talk:405th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: The entry states that F-15 C models were flown at Luke. This is not true. the 405th flew everything BUT C-models i.e A,B,D and E models. Please prove a citation to support the C-mole claims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.3.57.82 (talk) 17:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:410th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: The 410th AEW is not associated in any way with the 410th Bomb Wing.  Air Expeditionary Forces are numbered sequentially by the Air Force when they are formed as composite wings.  I served with the 410th AEW when it was deployed at the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom.--Mporter410 (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid you're wrong.  The Air Force's practice since the late 1990s has been to convert existing inactive units to provisional status, redesignate them as expeditionary units and assign them to major commands to activate or inactivate as needed.  Refer to Air Force Instruction 84-105, Organizational Lineage, Honors and Heraldry 1 February 2006, 13 May 2008 or 13 March 2013.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:416th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: The history of this page seems to indicate the articles were split at some time in the past, but neither talk page shows a discussion.  The two articles are about the same unit.  Once the merger is complete, the article should be moved to 416th Air Expeditionary Group (there's no "Operations" in the unit name) and this page, 416th Bombardment Wing and 416th Bombardment Group redirected there.--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Endorse merge. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Merge Bwmoll3 (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Merge —  dain- talk   01:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:42nd Air Base Wing

message: I have noticed that quite a few of these Air Base Wing articles contain the phrase: "The wing has a long and distinguished history." I kind of feel it violates WP:PEACOCK. Any comments? Ohconfucius ¡digame! 10:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock terms 

message: At some point during 1942 or 1943, the 42d Bomb Group converted from Martin B-26 Marauders to B-25 aircraft, ending the war in 1945 with B-25's. Also, they flew Douglas A-26 Invaders and Douglas A-20 Havocs shortly after the war until deactivation in 1946. It would improve the article to clarify and include this information into the WW 2 section.--TGC55 (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WW 2, conversion B-26 to B-25 
Talk:444th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: I have just finished copyediting this article, but a few things still stand out:
In '1945': "It received a DUC for attacking oil storage facilities at Oshima"
and later in the same paragraph: "receiving another DUC for this action"
What is a DUC? 
I think it means 'Distinguished Unit Citation', but as it turns up without introduction or explanation, I would rather be sure before I or anyone else adds it.  
: That's what it is.  It's now spelled out in the infobox --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They sure do.  All references to the group turning in its planes have been removed. (it didn't, the planes were transferred to another group).--Lineagegeek (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions and contradictions

message: The article indicates that modifications to the B-29s in 1944 were performed elsewhere.  However  would seem to indicate civilian workers were hired to perform the modifications at Great Bend.  Which is it?--Lineagegeek (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of modifications 

message: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mohammedzatar/?originalSubdomain=jo
Buckshot06 (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GWOT
Talk:446th Airlift Wing

message: The link, , identified as "446th Airlift Wing website"  does not contain any of the details it is cited to, but is only a general page for the ing.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source verification 
Talk:484th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: From personal experience, the 484 AEW was responsible for administrative control (ADCON) of all Air Force personnel who were embedded and deployed with the Army in Iraq.  They provided logistical support to fulfill needs of Air Force units that the US Army wasn't able to meet.  They supervised a variety of forward-deployed Air Force personnel, primarily Air Liaison Officers, Tactical Control Parties, and Combat Weathermen.
The unit first stood up at Prince Sultab AB, Saudi Arabia early in 2003 (or maybe earlier) but then transferred to Al Udeid AB, Qatar by spring 2003.  The unit was downgraded to the 484 Air Expeditionary Group in September 2003.  There were plans to eliminate the group completely and merge it with the Southwest Asia Air Operations Center sometime after, but I departed before I had any further contact with the unit.
Sgtgary (talk) 09:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:485th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: The 585th Tactical Missile Group was consolidated with the 485th Bombardment Group to form the 485th Tactical Missile Wing.  Little enough in either article to justify standing alone in this circumstance. --Lineagegeek (talk) 20:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support*  Bwmoll3 (talk) 23:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

text: *Support* Buckshot06 (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: There is no reference for the conversion of the group from Matador to Mace missiles.   indicates that the 38th Tactical Missile Wing began operating Maces in 1960, but also continued to use Matadors until 1962.  The L&H statement for the 485th shows only the Matador as equipment for the 585th Group.  The 71st Squadron continued missile operations until 1969 and certainly converted to the Mace, but did it do so before transfer from the 585th?--Lineagegeek (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Matador and Mace
Talk:486th Air Expeditionary Wing

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 486th Air Expeditionary Wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218020907/http://www.486th.org:80/photos/Letters/doodlebugs.htm to http://www.486th.org/photos/Letters/doodlebugs.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090417234312/http://486th.org:80/index3.htm to http://www.486th.org/index3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:505th Command and Control Wing

message: I have deleted: "fighting and winning our nations battles" in the 'Mission' section. Do I have to say why?
I have changed: "With the end of the war in 1973..." to: "With the American withdrawal in 1973..." in the 'Vietnam war' section, because the war did not end until 1975.
RASAM (talk) 21:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: The Seattle Fighter Wing has no lineal relationship to the 505th Command and Control Wing. Both were responsible for air defense of the Pacific Northwest at different times.  In between this function was performed by the 414th AAF Base Unit.  The material on the Seattle Fighter Wing should be moved to replace the redirect currently at that page.--Lineagegeek (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Seattle Fighter Wing
Talk:Application directory

message: As suggested, I've added a selection of screenshots which should be illustrative. I shouldn't think the non-standard but sensible icons will confuse, but feel free to replace with vanilla versions if that adds something other than retro-uglification. Also bumped importance up to "mid" as there's nothing "optional" about AppDirs in RISC OS! :-) nemo (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshots

message: The RISC OS system directory and its structure needs a page of its own really. nemo 10:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . I think this article can cover the aspects of different implementations of this feature, perhaps with each OS/implementation under its own heading. Wikipedia users could then easily compare and contrast them. I don't think that compartmentalising knowledge is helpful if the objective is learning. --trevj (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  The problem of storing and organising operating system files is a different problem from that of distributing and installing application files. The method that has evolved in RISC OS is quite different from those employed in Windows or Unix based OSes, and there is much to compare and contrast. The link with betwinner app "application directory"   is somewhat superficial – it would be like arguing that a description of the contents and organisation of the WINDOWS directory should be listed under  Folder. nemo (talk) 09:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Indeed. I Don’t think String dot pling boot would work so well! X-D nemo (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: $.!Boot

message: Is there going to be any body text added to this page about the ROX implementation of this concept? At the moment this is a page that in theory about a generic OS concept but the discussion is entirely about the specifics of one implementation.--Flibble (talk) 11:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually ignore me, my brains are having a bad day.--Flibble (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ROX PoV
Talk:64th Air Expeditionary Group

message: The text claims that the 64th Air Expeditionary Group is located at Erskin Village, 20 km southeast of Riyadh.  Scanning Google maps raises questions of whether any such unit could be stationed there, because its mission would seem to require airplanes and a runway that would be visible in the photographs;  I saw none.  
Also, I heard that the US withdrew most of its troops from Saudi Arabia to reduce the recruitment value those troops had for Al Qaeda.  Leaving a unit that close to Riyadh -- and on the other side of Riyadh from the international airport -- would seem contrary to that rationale.  
The narrative may be correct, but it sounds inconsistent with other things I've read.  DavidMCEddy (talk) 16:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The 64th AEG is still at Eskan Village. It has no flight line and provides support for USMTM and OPM-SANG.  daintalk   12:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the 64th Air Expeditionary Group in Saudi Arabia? 

message: The two are not the same unit.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Wikipedia talk:Special:ExpandTemplates

message: May we add parameter  " name_date "  to the Royalty Template. It is relevant  because some Geographic locations are named after Royalty when named on their " name_date ".  Philip III  ( below) is one such example
{{Infobox royalty
| name           = Philip III
| image          = Andres López 001.jpg
| caption        = Portrait by Andrés López Polanco
| succession     = King of Spain, Portugal, Naples, Sicily, and Sardinia; Duke of Milan
| moretext       = (more...)
| reign          = 13 September 1598 – 31 March 1621
| predecessor    = Philip II and I
| successor      = Philip IV and III
| birth_date     = 14 April 1578
| name_date      = 1 May                                                     <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
| birth_place    = Madrid, Spain
| death_date     = 
Warning: Page using Template:Infobox royalty with unknown parameter "name_date" (this message is shown only in preview).
House of Habsburg
LawrieM (talk) 04:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Royalty template
Wikipedia talk:Special:ListUsers

message: Is it true that DarTar is the only researcher? Uw-ublock (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Researchers 

message: When embedding this list of users in an article (for example), can extra parameters be defined, like how many to display or what user group to display etc? --62.65.229.71 (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just in case anyone wants to know an answer to this. You can display a specific user group by writing {{Special:ListUsers/<group-name>}}. E.g., . You can make the list starts at a username via {{Special:ListUsers/<start-name>}}. E.g., . You can also specify both starting name and group name. E.g., . The last form provides a way to specify a starting name that is the same as a group name: something like . AFAIK, it's not possible to limit number of items to display. --Nullzero (talk) 04:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special page embedding
Wikipedia talk:Special:UnusedCategories

message: This Special page would be more useful if it excluded category redirects. Stepheng3 (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirects 

message: There are currently a lot of redirects on this list such as :Category:1774 in the United States. I suggest removing these from the list. Kumioko (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also skip categories that contain Template:Empty category. Kumioko (talk) 01:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This. It makes actually empty categories stand out. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

text: If any of you are interested, it may help to get some action on this if you subscribe and/or comment on the Phabricator ticket. —swpbT 15:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

text: The ticket to fix this is on the developer wishlist; if you want to see it acted on, you can vote for it there. —swpbT 19:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest removing redirects from this list 

message: Any chance this list could be updated daily? It includes a lot of categories that are, unfortunately, excluded from the database empty categories list. It would be very helpful to see it daily rather than every 3 days. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 17:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This list is usually updated by now but so far, no new list. I'm not even sure where to inquire as I doubt many people that could help watch this talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 15:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Frequency of updates to list
Wikipedia talk:Special:Statistics

message: ----
Can anyone fill in the three blanks? - Nocturnal Wanderer 19:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

message: There are  registered user accounts, of which  (or __%) have administrative tools.
: The first and third are done with parser functions. Basically just a bit of math.
: Average edits per page:  – produces 
: Percentage of administrators: % – produces %
: It's not possible to access the size of the job queue through wikitext outside of Special:Statistics. However, since the number quoted is usually inaccurate, it's completely meaningless to anyone except developers and there's nothing anyone can do about it anyway, one does wonder why it's even on there -- 217.44.236.162 21:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: User statistics

message: There's a problem with the "Content pages" label on the top of Special:Statistics.
It links to Special:AllPages with the parameter hideredirects=1. However, when clicked, the parameter doesn't seem to work; the resulting page includes redirects and appears exactly identical to how Special:AllPages looks without the parameter. Test for yourself here: with and without parameter. It seems that the hideredirects parameter doesn't work currently. I can't find any mention of it at mw:Help:All pages either, so the function to hide redirects from the AllPages page apparently doesn't exist.
Therefore, I suggest removing the link from "Content pages", since it is functionally redundant to the "Pages" link below. If there is a correct parameter to use in place of hideredirects I'm all for using that instead though - but I can't find any notion of that. Gaioa (T C L) 20:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There's nothing that we can do about this. The parameter is hardcoded in MediaWiki. In the general case, it will work, but not in MiserMode, which Wikimedia wikis use. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, but surely somehow someone can fix it? Should I submit some kind of bug report or whatever to MW? I honestly really bugs me that the link on Statistics doesn't work, and it would be really practical to explore a list of non-r articles. I can take the initiative and push this issue, just point me in the right direction. Gaioa (T C L) 10:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   :phab:T228552 is about this issue. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Content pages" link doesn't work
Wikipedia talk:Special:UserLogin

message: A frequent complaint by new users is that they weren't aware of the content disclaimers about spoilers, objectionable pictures or profanity; too often these disclaimers have to be explained by experienced editors, when they ideally should have found them on their own. 
The account creation page is the perfect place to inform new users with a link more prominent than the one found at the bottom of all Wikipedia pages, that few people reads. It should include a visible warning notice, with the summarizing title of the content disclaimer ("WIKIPEDIA CONTAINS CONTENT THAT MAY BE OBJECTIONABLE") and a link to the disclaimer page. Diego (talk) 09:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Wikipedia disclaimers at user creation and login screen
Talk:Fond du Lac Light

message: The date given for its foundation suggests that it is a remarkable structure worthy of wider recognition.SilasW 10:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date built? or unpreviewed typing?
Wikipedia talk:Special:WithoutInterwiki

message: This page seems a little useless for this project, as unless the relative sizes of the various Wikipedias change dramatically there are always going to be well over a million articles here without interwiki links. It's certainly not a lot of use to editors here as the thousand-page limit doesn't even get you as far as "A" Perhaps it could be disabled, to improve performance? – Gurch 18:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehe looks a lot like unwatched pages... Majorly (talk | meet) 08:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, I've been having similar problem on Croatian wiki, I could also use version that lists categories. --Ivan Bajlo 19:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just stumbled upon this and it seems pretty useful, though more so for other language versions than English (due to the large number of articles unlikely to have foreign-language versions). To fix the issue of the thousand-page limit, would it be possible to make it like Special:Allpages and accept a slash to start at a certain point? Rigadoun  (talk) 01:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary? 

message: I updated MediaWiki:Withoutinterwiki-summary to say that the list is limited to 1000 pages. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limitation message 

message: I wonder why nobody has dealt with this problem from the technical side. I imagine it should be possible to tweak the software and let it build this list starting a certain alphabetical letter or letters. This would be of so much help in finding articles without iw links, especially in smaller Wikipedias.--Morel (talk) 03:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any news? 

message: A list in Duplicity tool is available. The list is updated daily. --Manu1400 (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  tool Duplicity 

message: Is there a way to get similar list in a PerScan using SPARQL or something like that?-Zygimantus (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPARQL
Talk:Happy Hacking Keyboard

message: I don't think the best picture to go along with this article is a blank keys HHK. It means I can't refer to the picture to see the layout described by the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.240.248 (talk) 11:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here for exactly that: info on the unique layout. I don't own this keyboard so I can't take a better picture. -78.20.116.246 (talk) 13:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blank keys instead of actual layout 

message: The trouble with getting references to discuss this keyboard and its features is that basically everything about it is in Japanese. A Happy Hacking Keyboard Professional 2 Type-S Blank keys with US layout ships with a leaflet entirely in Japanese. It's pretty hard to even figure out how to set the dip switches to your liking. So for someone to write a well referenced article about this keyboard they'd need to be bilingual yet prefer to write in English. Dlamblin (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't someone who speaks Japanese just translate the leaflet and post it somewhere? RoflCopter404 (talk) 08:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Seems like some version with USB-C, USB-A, and BT got released in 2020 (or maybe end of 2019?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.251.174.211 (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 version