Talk:Decepticon

message: this should be deleted.
Decepticon is covered better in the parent article
:I disagree.  Information is better covered in the parent article, but that can be easily remedied.  This article is the logical place that a researcher will look if he needs to develop informational source on Decepticon forces, who clearly represent a threat to Autobots, Autobot-sympathists and neutrally aligned forces.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.250.65.158 (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted

message: Where'd the speedy delete come from?  It's not listed in article or image history. - MSTCrow 02:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Delete? 

message: *Which Decepticon turns into a C-130 Hercules?
*Which Decepticon turns into a M2 Bradley?
*Which Decepticon turns into a C-17 Globemaster III?
*Which Decepticon turns into a Tu-160 Blackjack?
*Which Decepticon turns into a RAH-66 Comanche?
(TougHHead 08:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicle Mode Questions 

message: Let me guess. They are popular due to they turn into military vehicles and have high rating for no reason.(TougHHead 06:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity? 

message: I know that there is already a list of Autobots and list of Decepticons pages, however I would like to know  if anyone would be opposed to a Generation 1 list for this page which has both Autobots and Decepticons. It is a bit more compact and you can view it here Libro0 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of G1 

message: Since the logo was changed by an anonymous user without discussion I am going to replace the other image. I will only do this once since to me it really doesn't matter one way or another. So if someone wants the new one go ahead and change it back. It does not affect the article content. Libro0 (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the current logo should be replaced with something clearer and more "distilled". -- 66.92.0.62 (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decepticon Logo 

message: I find it highly impropable that the name "Decepticon" was influenced by the Italian word diciasette (misspelled "dicasette" in the article, I have already corrected it). Even the claim that the number 17 is unlucky in Italy because vixi is an anagram of XVII sounds extremely far-fetched, but for the moment, I'll take the contributor's word for it. However, I find the similarity between "Decepticon" and diciasette far too distant (what, both begin with the letter "D"?) to be anything but a coincidence. JIP | Talk 17:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diciasette 

message: This article is hilarious. Don't change anything.
Rblack2001 (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  don't change a thing 

message: All that's here is a bunch of poorly worded information about what the Japanese call decepticons and what forms they have. No examples, no information about their villain story. Disappointed. 24.189.110.244 (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpfulness isn't good 

message: It doesn't really seem like Autobot and Decepticon are notable by themselves. Perhaps they could be merged into Cybertronian or Transformer (fictional species)? 2605:B40:13E7:F600:949F:C33D:7BD5:A7CC (talk) 23:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But are they notable by themselves? 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F1C9:F6F7:4BBF:BED8 (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I remove merge template because is not necessary 2001:44C8:44A4:A84:A0B7:DF6E:2B04:4627 (talk) 02:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you not understanding here? The discussion. Has not. Been. Resolved. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:F1C9:F6F7:4BBF:BED8 (talk) 02:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Your argument appears to be "let's put two non-notable things together, and the result will be notable". That doesn't make any sense. If "Autobot" is not notable, then "Cybertronian" is also not notable. Toughpigs (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay then, maybe an AFD would be better. 38.15.33.113 (talk) 13:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is what I keep telling you. Toughpigs (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

text: I have declined you merge 125.26.84.83 (talk) 03:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal