Talk:LAC Group

message: According to the message on my user page the article was flagged because it "seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article."  I reviewed several company articles and tried to use them as a model for the article and would appreciate input on how to make this more appropriate.  
I'm not sure what the problem is:
*The article is not a blurb/stub like Jim Henson Home Entertainment
*It is more balanced than several articles -- like OCLC with it's near monopoly on library services.
Before the article was flagged:
*The article was wikified - with links to other sections of Wikipedia as I thoguht was appropriate.
*References were added to the article for the major statements of facts (the dates were for today, since I thought to verify the references that I'd gathered several months ago).
Since the article was flagged as spam: 
*I removed the "Significant Clients" section (like the one found on the Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman page.
*I added a "Major Competitors" section (although I did not see a lot of company websites that mentioned more than one.
Q: Should I source the facts in the Infobox?  I wasn't sure.
Jennifer Lange-Pomes (talk) 22:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Library Associates Companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050520211457/http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m5072/is_33_26/ai_n6176508 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m5072/is_33_26/ai_n6176508
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Library Associates Companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517012126/http://www.llrx.com/features/outsourcing.htm to http://www.llrx.com/features/outsourcing.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081015142908/http://www.llrx.com/features/pms.htm to http://www.llrx.com/features/pms.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722143443/http://units.sla.org/chapter/cpnw/interface/2003/fall/news.html to http://units.sla.org/chapter/cpnw/interface/2003/fall/news.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722143443/http://units.sla.org/chapter/cpnw/interface/2003/fall/news.html to http://units.sla.org/chapter/cpnw/interface/2003/fall/news.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081015142908/http://www.llrx.com/features/pms.htm to http://www.llrx.com/features/pms.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517012126/http://www.llrx.com/features/outsourcing.htm to http://www.llrx.com/features/outsourcing.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified