Talk:Ketorolac

message: Actually, "Dosage, availability and price" part is valid for US only, and US is not a typical example when we are talking about drugs. In Russia, for example, price is about 10 times less, and I think it's available over-the-counter in most of the world.
Good point, but it's still a good entry otherwise. I just got an injection of Toradol and wondered what it was. It answered all my questions.
Eperotao 14:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US specific information 

message: I'm interested: what are the reasons in favour of a merger?  User:Jeff Dahl, it looks like you are proposing this.  Could you tell us why it's a good idea?  Personally, I don't feel strongly either way. However, I do note that the Ketorolac article now specifically excludes ophthalmic solutions of ketorolac, and that would have to change. --Jdlh  | Talk 07:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My reasoning on the proposed merger, besides the obvious point that it is the same active drug, is that the acular article doesn't really add much information except manufacturers and citations. The sources listed, links etc. are great, but the body of the article is little more than a few sentences that could be better integrated into the ketorolac article. Even if the acular article were expanded by putting in the drug information, it would be just a duplication of the ketorolac article. By merging, we can make the coverage of the ketorolac article more thorough. I am eager to hear what everyone thinks about it. Jeff Dahl 15:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I have no objection to a merger, though don't feel strongly in favour either. The Wikipedia:Be bold principle gives you license to go ahead if no objection appears.  If you want more input than this trickle, you could ask Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology, or look at how other editors have handled this same topic for other cases. --Jdlh  | Talk 18:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you for being bold. --Jdlh  | Talk 17:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Acular]] into [[Ketorolac]] 

message: There are two IUPAC names given in the article: (±)-5-benzoyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-1-carboxylic acid (C15H13NO3)2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol (C4H11NO3) The pictured compound is the first of those two. The drug is named "ketorolac tromethamine" and is actually a salt in 1:1 ratio of the two components. I think should supply a picture containing both structures.  ralmin 00:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC Name 

message: Can we have a forwarding page from ketorolaco into this one?  I'm not sure how to do that, but it's important since in Latin America this is how it's known (as it states correctly in the article) but could not be found in a wikipedia search (or google for that matter).Cpt ricard (talk) 07:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ketarolaco page

message: I need to reinsert 'short-term' because this 'unique' characteristic is important.
:Best Regards,
::Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 21:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: ok 12.244.210.174 (talk) 21:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Short-term is important

message: eg a 2013 review : Ketorolac in the treatment of acute migraine: a systematic review., and  - Could mention/describe use for migraine (which does mention K) ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could mention use for migraine 

message: Anti-inflammation approach shows promise for preventing cancer metastasis - may be worth mentioning, now or soon. - Rod57 (talk) 09:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preclinical research as preoperative alternative to chemotherapy for cancer 

message: The drug is a significant part of the plot in Knives Out, mention here?Naraht (talk) 13:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention its use in Knives Out? 

message: The first paragraph of the 'History' section currently contains the sentence "An IV form of paracetamol, which is not an NSAID, became available in Europe in 2009 and then in the US." This doesn't seem pertinent to an article about Ketorolac. 74.58.147.69 (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire "History" section needs to be rewritten; it's not the history of the drug at all. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇  16:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unappropriate mention of paracetamol? 

message: Krtorolac 84.47.208.26 (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ketorolac