Talk:Street Fighter Alpha (series)

message: I have not deleted Gameplay section, I have just moved it to a more appropriate place. I have moved it just below Series progression section. Gameplay has nothing to do with series progression throughout the years, so it should be separate section.
Also I have placed Trivia section for SFA2 as subsection of SFA2 section. By looking just by contenst of the article alone, someone might thing that there was a Street Fighter Alpha game named "Trivia".
You should have inspected my edits more carefully. I will revert to my edits now.--RockyMM 22:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that your edits made article much better. My mistake was that I saw that there were two infoboxes, so I thought (without carefully looking) that someone duplicated an infobox. There was no third infobox when I edited article. Also, now, when article is like this, there really is no reason for every game to have its own page. I just said that because it is common to have only one infobox per article, but now, when I see this article like this, it's just perfectly OK.--RockyMM 15:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  On the other hand, why do you think that Gameplay section should be a subsection of Series progression rather than a section of its own?--RockyMM 15:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  :) The problem I'm having with doing these Street Fighter-related articles is that I've been playing SF a long time, and it's difficult to write about it in layman's terms without resorting to cruft, especially with Alpha 3.  But I might give it a shot, see if I can hack it. Danny Lilithborne 02:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay section 

message: What do you think? Should it be merged here? Also, that article is not in very good shape right now.--RockyMM 17:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just wondering if that would be a good move.  In either case the article should be cleaned up, but it could probably fit as a book end to this.  I am gong to see if i can create an info box on this page to go with it's section. Hewinsj 17:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks good. I don't think that there is much to say that isn't already covered in this article. I'll propose a move. --RockyMM 10:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about [[Street Fighter Alpha Anthology]]? 

message: I'm deleting the line "SFA3 is considered by many fans to be the best Street Fighter game (to date)" due to the bias in the statement.--68.100.218.63 07:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We probably should have a Street Fighter II (series) article.  I'm in no condition to debate right now, though. JuJube (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: i thought charlie was a rehashing of guile.  his stage looks similar and he has some of the same moves...... can anyone confirm?  rhetoric 17:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  charlie 

message: Seriously. BTW, all the games in the Street Fighter Alpha series are known as Street Fighter Zero in Japan, Asia, South America and Spain, with Street Fighter Alpha 3 being the only exception. - Master Bigode from SRK.o//(Talk) (Contribs) 00:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I split the article. 

message: Personally, I find this article sort of pointless. We don't have a Street Fighter II (series) article that links to the original, Super and HD Remix (likewise for III where all three games are covered in one article), so I don't see any reason for doing the same here. This article is unsourced and Street Fighter (series) already serves as an overview of all the major incarnations. If there's no objection, I'll merge the two. Jonny2x4 (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We probably should have a Street Fighter II (series) article.  I'm in no condition to debate right now, though. JuJube (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with the first game.