lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Labyrinth of Solitude

message: This reverential article ignores the outrage expressed in Latino Studies at Paz's dismissal of Mexican Americans as Mexicans who have forgotten their identity and now have none. It's a typical Old Country inability to grasp what happens in America. Paz even praised the "pachuco" for, as he saw it, dramatizing that stateless agony. Richard Rodriguez has written against Paz, and in praise of the Mexican American as American.  Profhum (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is important to cover.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagiography, needs balance 

message: We need to integrate some material about José Vasconcelos and La raza cósmica ('The Cosmic Race') from which Paz further developed -related ideas.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  17:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vasconcellos
Talk:National Muzzle Loading Rifle Association

message: Where can we get reasonable coverage ? 50.40.224.17 (talk) 19:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charter club insurance including shooting
Talk:Mary of Hungary (governor of the Netherlands)

message: I have removed this image from the article. The museum it's housed in has identified the sitter as Anne of Hungary and Bohemia, Mary's sister-in-law, and comparison of this portraits to other portraits of the two women seems corroborative. I've also nominated the image for deletion on Commons, as the image already exists under correct identification there. --NellieBly (talk) 06:35, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improperly identified image in article 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Mary (1505–1558), Queen of Hungary.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 15, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-09-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Mary (1505–1558), Queen of Hungary.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: I think that this article could be renamed to Mary of Austria(governer of the Netherlands) or Mary of Habsburg. Because almost always when there is a name of the country instead of someone's surname, this indicates that this person what native to that country, for example Anne of Denmark, Henrietta Maria of France and so on, while this woman was merely married to a Hungarian king for a short period of time after which she had almost no connection to that nation. Super20020917 (talk) 11:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name "Mary of Hungary"
Talk:Isabella of Austria

message: Is this the right location?  I'd have thought Isabella of Austria is more correct. john k 22:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I dont' know the cause of death in this article. Isabella died very young, that's clear. What about ? An illness, an accident, by a misscarriage .... ? 
I hope, that somebody find more details.
The Princess of Denmark (Mary's daughter), Isabella, born 2007, is named after her "relativ". --AndreaMimi (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have expanded the article greatly today. She died of some sort of long-term illness, not childbirth, but the references does not specify her sickness. In those days, the diagnosis of illnesses may have been harder. People back in 1526 may simply have said she was "sick", nothing more. They may not have known the cause. --85.226.42.150 (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: Was she also Regent of Norway?--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean in 1520? That is not likely. She was regent in Denmark in 1520 because her spouse was in Sweden, who was in union with Denmark just as Norway. There was no change in Norway, which would have been ruled the same way during her husband's stay in Sweden as it was during his stay in Denmark, where he normally lived. --Aciram (talk) 22:17, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regent of Norway 

message: Her initial resting place was apparently in the Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-Sint-Pieterskerk in Belgium. We have just received an image donation of her tombstone there. Can this be integrated into the article? cheers, Amada44  talk to me 19:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her initial resting place 

message: I edited the place to which Christian fled from 'Netherlands' to 'Low Countries'. Since Netherlands refers to the page about the present-day Netherlands, this is incorrect. Christian spent his exile in Lier, present-day Belgium. 'Low Countries' refers to the entire region, indeed under one rule in Isabella's time. 146.175.202.162 (talk) 12:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netherlands / Low Countries 

message: Do we have confirmation of this? Isabella was born in Brussels and raised in Mechelen alongside her brother Charles (future emperor Charles V), whose native tongue is generally regarded to be french, not german. Brussels was french-speaking, Mechelen was dutch-speaking but the nobility spoke french. Her brother is thought to have never even dominated German, and even addressed his german subjects in French several times. I would imagine that Isabella, having shared an upbringing with Charles, would also not be a native German Speaker.
The Chumbo One (talk) 08:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Her native german"
Talk:Frederick I of Denmark

message: Please join the discussion here Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 14:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Frederik or Frederick
Talk:Isabella of Aragon, Queen of Portugal

message: Was she also Princess of Aragon? (Was she recognized as heiress presumptive of her father?) Surtsicna (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons.
* Support Surtsicna (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Where was she buried? I got Santa Isabella in Toledo from this site. But is there even a church or monastery in Toledo by the name of Santa Isabella?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 23:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial
Talk:Edward Plantagenet, 17th Earl of Warwick

message: Should Edward be in :Category:Heirs to the English throne as he currently is? The idea that he was named as Richard's heir is, as the article notes, disputed by several historians on the grounds that it would have been very damaging to Richard's own claim to recognise him as such. Later Yorkist rebellions did try to make use of his claim, but this was after the throne had passed to the Tudors. Dunarc (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Richard only made him heir after his own son had died, when Edward was still a minor and not really a threat - and it's thought that was in deference to Anne, whose nephew Edward was, because, as soon as she was dead, he named an adult heir. Deb (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. I take the point and that is certainly the view some historians make, but the problems are a) the claim Richard made him an heir seems to only exist in the work of John Rous whose reliability is an issue as he changed his views depending on who was in power and b) a number of historians think the idea of Richard naming Warwick as an heir is unlikely. I take the point about his youth, but it could be argued that even though Warwick was a child recognising him as heir would have been dangerous as he was from a senior York line so could challenge Richard in adulthood, or serve as a focal point for some of  the Yorkists estranged from Richard (in much the same way as happened to an extent under the Tudors when Lincoln and others used a fake Warwick to try and depose Henry). Equally the adult Lincoln would have been a much better bet for Yorkist survival should Richard die suddenly (the experience of Edward V showing the problems of a minor reigning). However I suppose given that the possibility exists that Warwick was designated heir so he could be left in the category. Dunarc (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Heirs to the English throne 

message: Rajputudor added the image , at first wrongly identifying Edward of Middleham as Edward, Earl of Warwick. I've removed it pending further discussion. Do we really want to add this to the article? Does a Victorian illustration contribute anything? Deb (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't. Surtsicna (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The consensus is that the image is unhelpful. Furthermore, the caption is badly written and incorrectly spaced so it detracts from the effectiveness of the illustration. If you still want to include this image, please demonstrate that you have consensus for the inclusion. Deb (talk) 07:19, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

text: I agree that the image is not helpful to the article (which makes three editors who agree). Rajputudor, please stop trying to add it. Disruptive editing can impact your editing privileges. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 19:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Image introduced by [[User:Rajputudor]]
Talk:Lionel of Antwerp, Duke of Clarence

message: Wasn't Lionel his father representative in Ireland not England? GoodDay (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Representing his father where? 

message: Belgium didn't exist back then (as his place of birth should state Brabant, and then the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation), and Brabant wasn't flemish, that's a modern term for what we today call Belgophone (Dutch-Speaking) Belgium, it's like writing about someone from Utrecht and claiming he was from Holland (a Hollander/Holandic), or stating that a Scotsman is English because it belongs to the United Kingdom of Great-Britain & Northern-Ireland, I suggest that Flemish and Belgian be replaced with Brabantic, and that the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation be added where it belongs. --1.55.1.245 (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written from a Modern perspective that holds no historical value. 

message: I don't care if it's referenced, the assertion about Lionel Of Antwerp's stature is highly questionable. Perhaps it would be more accurate to state that "it has been suggested that ... " or "such and such a source has stated that ..." rather than stating plainly that he "grew to be nearly seven feet in height". If anyone has measured his skeleton and can verify this assertion then fair enough, but otherwise it is certainly subject to doubt! The text to me reads like something out of a primary school children's book. John2o2o2o (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the essay, Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. Peaceray (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  stature 

message: There is a lot more material in :wikisource:Lionel of Antwerp (DNB00) than can be incorporated into this article. Peaceray (talk) 20:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  More source material at Wikisource:Lionel of Antwerp (DNB00) 

message: This is a bit confusing since the 1911 Britannica gives it at 7th Oct, as does the 1893 DNB link. I don't have easy access to the modern ODNB link. However, "A collection of all the wills, now known to be extant, of the kings and queens of England, princes and princesses of Wales, and every branch of the blood royal, from the reign of William the Conqueror to that of Henry the Seventh exclusive : with explanatory notes, and a glossary" gives it as the 17th, "having made this will not a fortnight earlier". So I think the 17th is probably correct. http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/ENGLAND,%20Kings%201066-1603.htm#Lioneldied1368 also gives it as the 17th. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got a friend to check the ODNB and it also gives the 17th. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date
Talk:Thomas Betterton

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: This now looks rather brief: a better idea of him would perhaps be useful.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:GMR (magazine)

message: Does GMR actually stand for anything?
64.81.164.200 18:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas Shadwell

message: In a number of places in the article, the author seems to use personal opinion without supporting citations. For example, in the Work section: His best playsBold text are Epsom Wells (1672), for which Sir Charles Sedley wrote a prologue, and the Squire of Alsatia (1688). 
RobotBoy66 (talk) 06:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor Opinion 

message: His son, Charles Shadwell was also a playwright. A scene from his play, The Stockjobbers was included as an introduction in Caryl Churchill's Serious Money (1987)
:We can't tell whether The Stockjobbers is by Thomas or Charles. Valetude (talk) 02:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify, please
Talk:Ian Scheckter

message: "he was refused entry into Japan due to his South African nationality (this being during the apartheid era)."
How come his brother Jody was allowed to participate?
According to the Atlas F1 Nostalgia forum "But, this was all after Ian's troubled foray into full-time F1 with the Rothman's March 761/771 - which ultimately saw him jailed in Japan after being refused entry into the country for the final race of the season on the grounds of being a South African! (Jody gained entry clearance after Walter Wolf, for whom he was driving at the time, squeezed the Canadian embassy who squeezed the Japanese..." Lec CRP1 17:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Denied entry in Japan?

message: What's the source for this?  In report after report in Autosport he was praised for getting the best out of the 761B which had serious handling deficiencies.  The 771 was no better, and his criticisms of the team grew louder.  He easily outperformed his team mate.  And another thing, as it's Christmas, March were not servicing five drivers.  Only Scheckter and Ribeiro were works drivers, and each had contributed around £80K.  The other Marches were run by RAM Racing for F&S Properties, Space Racing (i.e. BS Fabrications) for Brett Lunger, by Frank Williams for Patrick Neve, and by Arturo Merzario's own tiny team for himself. Allen Brown (talk) 21:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "he turned in some poor performances"
Talk:Boô

message: *This article is a translation from the article in the Dutch Wikipedia. - Mgm|(talk) 19:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could you also say "breadmaster"?
--Eric 21:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History > "bread lord"
Talk:6Q0B44E

message: Based on the small size and variable brightness of this object, one candidate would be an adapter panel from an Apollo lunar mission. Four panels joined the Saturn S-IVB upper stage to the Apollo Service Module, enclosing the Lunar Module. The four panels are shown here [] attached to the S-IVB on Apollo 7. This was an earth orbital mission without a lunar module.  On lunar missions the panels were were jettisoned to allow access to the lunar module inside.
After panel jettison and the extraction of the lunar module from the S-IVB, the remaining S-IVB propellants put it into solar orbit (Apollos 8,10-12) or on a lunar impact course (Apollos 13-17). Therefore the panels followed trajectories closer to that of the spacecraft than the S-IVB.  Although the Saturn Vs put the early Apollo missions on "free return" trajectories back to earth, these were not exact and required small course corrections. So it is quite possible that the adapter panels would swing around the moon, miss the earth and go into either a high earth orbit or  solar orbit. Like the Apollo 12 S-IVB it is possible that one of these panels has been recaptured into earth orbit.
There were nine Saturn-V launches to the moon (Apollos 8,10-17) and four panels per launch so there are 36 panels out there if none have hit the earth or the moon.
Another outside possibility is the lunar module ascent stage from Apollo 10. The other lunar module ascent stages either burned up in the earth's atmosphere or crashed into the moon, but Apollo 10 was ejected into a solar orbit. Spectrographic data from this object might distinguish between an adapter panel and a lunar module. Karn (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All very interesting, but unless someone publishes something on this we can't put it in the article. Modest Genius talk 20:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-IVB adapter panel? 

message: 6Q0B44E seems to have been lost in 2007, but recovered in 2018 as XL8D89E. See , which unfortunately isn't a WP:RS so I won't incorporate it into the article. Modest Genius talk 11:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to have been confirmed by an ESA source, though it's only a conference proceeding. Nevertheless I've added both sources to the article and adjusted the text accordingly. Modest Genius talk 14:44, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  XL8D89E
Talk:Feature story

message: If you look at the left navigation on this page of wikipedia, there's a "Featured content" section. Are they the same thing or are they not? If so, shall we call it featured story? Thanks, HK.Tang  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.123.154.51 (talk) 02:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Feature” or “featured” 

message: I'm not very clear on what happened to this article. Some help cleaning it up so I can actually decipher what's going on? 137.99.32.223 (talk) 03:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: I have reverted this addition a third time. I am sure it is an attempt to make a genuine contribution to the encyclopaedia but unfortunately it smacks far too much of a personal opinion. To be an acceptable part of the article, it needs to cite some sources for the points it makes - journalism textbooks, for example. See WP:VERIFY for information on the reasons for this; WP:CITE for information on how to cite sources; and WP:NOTESSAY. Thanks. Barnabypage (talk) 13:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feature_story&curid=6866893&diff=459620860&oldid=459620726 

message: — Assignment last updated by Savmanbanans (talk) 17:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Technical and Professional Communication

message: Thinking of adding additional paragraphs to the article that support the structuring of a Feature Story. Ideas include: "Transforming Ideas into Features" and "Obtaining Reliable Resources." These sections would contribute to the direction and purpose of writing a feature effectively. I have accumulated some reliable and relevant sources to support these potential sections. 
Hogarth, M. (2019). Writing Feature Articles: Print, Digital and Online (5th ed.). Routledge.
Garrison, B. (2023). Professional Feature Writing (6th ed.). Routledge. Aaashlle (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding new sections?
Talk:Ann Ree Colton

message: I added a citation to her biography in response to a {verify} tag.  If there are specifics about verification or POV issues, I've opened up this page for discussion of them.Archimboldo 18:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is essentially unsourced and should be reduced to a stub containing only verifiable facts. - - MrBill3 (talk) 17:23, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: Content has been repeatedly removed (three times this month). Edit warring over time is still edit warring. The removals lack appropriate edit summaries and there has been no discussion here. - - MrBill3 (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow edit warring is still edit warring
Talk:Canolfan Tryweryn

message: I am proposing a "merged" page titles "The Tryweryn" encompassing all references to the river Tryweryn (although it will be referred to as Afon Tryweryn to keep with the Welsh river's theme). See my Sandbox for the draft.  18:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Tryweryn

message: Why on Earth is this is 'Sport in England' category. The article clearly states that Canolfan Tryweryn is in Wales. Wales is not England. I can see no connection with England mentioned anywhere in the article.12:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *good pointDevAnubis 13:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sport in England
Talk:Fire + Ice

message: The Ian Read this article links to is pretty clearly not the Ian Read who founded Fire + Ice.
:fixed Folcwald 20:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I think the article should be merged with Ian Read (musician), as Ian Read is the sole member of Fire + Ice & both articles are short. Jgc2003 (talk) 21:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Berwick-upon-Tweed (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Someone needs to check this, Edward IV was King at the time, the future Henry VIII had not been born yet, either the date or the monarch is incorrect. (Added anonymously to main article by User:222.153.227.56)
: Looking into the dates - thanks for pointing it out. AndrewMcQ
:Thanks for pointing this out, it was a mis-reading by myself - it was enfranchised in the time of Henry VIII and not 1482, sorry for the mix-up! -- Joolz 21:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members of Parliament 

message: Sorry if I am being thick here but the infobox seems to say that this constituency was created in 1512; then lower down it says it was created from North Northumberland, which was created in 1832. Please enlighten me. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 09:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing 
Talk:Planet Caprica

message: This page doesn't seem to be necessary. It's half-disambiguation, half-article, and really doesn't need to be either. Furthermore, "Planet Caprica" is not the proper name of either of the planets it "disambiguates", so the page probably should never have gotten its own distinct article in the first place. In title, it's virtually indistinguishable from "Caprica (planet)" (which redirects to the main Caprica article), so this article should probably redirect there as well. I'm creating the redirect. That should finish cleaning up the current "Caprica" disambiguation web, unless I've missed something. -- Fru1tbat 18:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant page