lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boronic acid

message: Does anyone want to write a section on this? I wont have a chance to until June  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggilicious (talk • contribs) 13:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Petasis Reaction

message: The boronate/boronic ester section is seriously lacking, and to be honest I'm surprised it doesn't have its own page, considering its popularity in synthesis and sensing. I intend to either build it up over the coming few weeks or possible even revive the the boronate ester article and remove the redirect. Contributions welcome, of course. RRBinwood (talk) 08:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Great idea.  Try to emphasize reviews and books, otherwise these articles often end up focused on specialty results. Another thing: graphics. It is possible that some graphics should be replaced.  Some older editors tended to highlight exotica vs mainstream content.  We recommend --Smokefoot (talk) 11:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Totally in agreement. A lot of the transformations and uses of boronate/boronic esters are covered in fair depth in their own articles, so an overview of general content, with links to the specialised pages, would be more appropriate here I feel. Have noticed a lot of outdated ChemDraws throughout Organic Chemistry wiki articles, may well go through and fix as many as I can one day when I'm bored. RRBinwood (talk) 12:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Major-ish edit proposal
Talk:Moon Motor Car

message: I think this page needs some work.  A wish list would include an expanded history, a timeline, and a table of all models produced.  Also an infobox with all the Moon associated brands would be cool (something like on the Packard or Studebaker pages).  Also, pictures of other Moon models would be helpful.  The German language Wikipedia Moon page is much much closer to what we should have in English.  I'm going to make this page a priority on my to do list, but suggestions and help would be welcome.
I added a model section.  Please note that this table is derived from McConnell.  If you change or add anything, please site the source.  HornColumbia 04:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If cultural refs are useful, it may be interesting to some that Walt Disney owned and loved his Moon roadster (not sure which model).  This according to an American Experience episode about Disney on PBS Sept 14.  99.245.230.104 (talk) 07:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tehatta

message: Is it really a city/town? It seems to be a large subdivision consisting of Tehatta-I, Tehatta-II CDs and possible Karimpur CDs also from the references. --GDibyendu (talk) 16:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:Esclarmonde of Foix

message: I see that Die Ketzerin vom Montségur is listed as a reference, but to my knowledge, this is a fictional novel and therefore does not qualify as a reliable source, unless it's being used to reference the fact that fiction has been written about the subject. --Elonka 03:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is listed as a reference in the French article about this person. I ran the French article through a translator and used it as the major basis for this article. I also found additional references in English about her, which I have listed in the references, but I can't speak to whether this particular book is accurate or not because I don't speak French or German and haven't read it. --Bookworm857158367 17:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Elonka is right, "Die Ketzerin vom Montsegur" is a German novel ("Belletristik") and that's all there is too it. The German Wikipedia article doesn't use this novel as reference at all. It is only mentioned under "in fiction". In fact the German Wiki article refers completely to a book by Otto Rahn which is available in an English version here: Crusade  Against The Grail Beware, this book is very speculative and mainly based on a German translation of local folklore from Southern France. NordhornerII (Talk) _The man from Nordhorn 23:16, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable reference

message: "One legend has it that Esclarmonde turned into a dove and flew away when inquisitors of the Roman Catholic Church arrived to take her to her execution.[2]" Source: Jordan Stratford (2007). ""Order of Saint Esclarmonde"". egina2.blogspot.com. Retrieved March 18, 2007.
Not a legitimate source. Maybe this legend is referenced somewhere in a legitimate source, but a new age church website is not acceptable as a primary source. The author of the blog is also not a notable authority in the subject and his Wikipedia article, which he authored himself, has since come down.
Also this: "She is also honored in the Commemoration of Saints during the Gnostic Holy Eucharist of the Ecclesia Gnostica, of which Stephan Hoeller is the bishop. The Commemoration of Saints for the Johannite Divine Liturgy of the Apostolic Johannite Church also honors Esclarmonde de Foix." 
Ecclesia Gnostica has passed notability standards, but the Apostolic Johannite Church's page was taken down for not meeting those standards.Wikimonster007 (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a legitimate source 

message: As said in the template at the beginning of the article, this article is unclear and needs rewriting. It seems that there are notes paragraphs included not by Notes but embedded in the article and in the references. I rewrote the article on French wikipedia, adding sources (but in French, of course). I propose to rewrite the present article. I will ask for proofreading. Do you have an opinion about that ? --Tangopaso (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting ?
Talk:Thenzawl

message: Note:  Project Banner with Mizoram workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Mizoram or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 01:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Mizoram Addition
Talk:Tlabung

message: Wikipedia is not a place to put in personal blog entries. Please do not start an edit war. Thenothing 17:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Mizoram workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Mizoram or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 01:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Mizoram Addition
Talk:Tons River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 14:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Horsham Township, Pennsylvania

message: Where is the SofterWare Inc page?  They are a software company that has been in business for ~30 years and are a major employer in the area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.43.17.180 (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: SofterWare

message: I live here we need to improve this article.
There's a great deal more interesting about Horsham Township than that a professional basketball player lived there.  That material, if mentioned at all, should not be given the prominence it has at the beginning of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.154.2.44 (talk) 00:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cheriton, Kent

message: Is there a Lord of Cheriton? If so, do you know wo he is? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.195.75.184 (talk) 21:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord of Cheriton? 

message: What is the interest of having a linked story of Adrian Stone appearing twice in this article? To put him in the Notable People list when he has no wikipedia article about himself is also open to question.Cloptonson (talk) 20:56, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Adrian Stone - Relevance?
Talk:American School of Tegucigalpa

message: This article is horrendously written and requires a complete reboot in my opinion. To the poster below me: Wikipedia is not your vanity press, _nobody_ cares that you know X Latin American aristocrat or oligarch, and that you're so proud to have been part of an "elite" circle and need to come create hagiographies on the schools you attended on an encyclopedia intended for international viewing. 
You may think your article is boasting your school, but really it just sounds like silly and immature sycophancy to people who don't know/don't care about Honduran elites. 
I don't know any of these people you're talking about, or care to know either; I just know they don't belong here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.216.62.74 (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I totally agree with you, this article must be either rewritten or erased. Obviously the person who wrote this isn't well informed about Wikipedia. (Sunsetterxxx (talk) 20:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please feel free to delete or modify any part of the article that you deem against policy.  The article has suffered a few edits and a lot of the controversial material was removed in the past. This is no an article with high traffic, so it would be very unlikely that tagging it only would help improve its quality.  Wikihonduras (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Take your sycophancy elsewhere. 

message: From one of the pilars of Wikipedia:
"A Wikipedia conflict of interest is an incompatibility between the purpose of Wikipedia, to produce a neutral encyclopedia, and the aims of individual editors. These include editing for the sake of promoting oneself, other individuals, causes, organizations, companies, or products, as well as suppressing negative information, and criticizing competitors.
In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a clear conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. Of special concern are organizational conflicts of interest.[1] Failure to follow these guidelines may put the editor at serious risk of embarrassing himself or his client.
Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", but if you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with, 
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors, 
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); 
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography. "
Please avoid failing to comply with policy.
Wikihonduras 23:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminder of Wikipedia Policy
Talk:Uğur Uluocak

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Yuksom

message: In the Gallery section, :File:Yuksom Dubdi Gompa.jpg appears to be the same building as :File:Kartok gumpa - yuksam.jpg, taken a few years earlier and possibly at a different time of year. It seems to be in the middle of a remodel in the older picture, with an unpainted rail, a wooden platform in place of the spiral staircase, and electrical fittings in places occupied by electric lanterns in the more recent image. Otherwise, and apart from the banners, the buildings appear identical, right down to the other structure visible behind it. Can someone who knows the difference somehow reconcile these?
I posted this to both places, and to the related Wikipedia article, to maximize visibility. 192.91.171.42 (talk) 22:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Identical building, different descriptions 
Talk:Zawlnuam

message: Note:  Project Banner with Mizoram workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Mizoram or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 01:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Mizoram Addition
Talk:Civet

message: :::"With one exception, civets are some of the members of the family Viverridae."
I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean. Is it saying that Viverridae is made up solely of civets with a single exception? If it is, surely theres a clearer way to say it. I'd like to know if anyone can confirm this so I can edit it to read a little easier. Bigbrisco 16:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty Grammar 

message: ...is for a preparation of certain meats. Google "civet of hare" or "civet of rabbit" to see. 86.136.252.84 01:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other use of "civet"... 

message: The sentence "Chanel, maker of the popular perfume Chanel No. 5, claims that natural civet has been replaced with a synthetic substitute since 1998." has a little '[citation needed]' note.  Here's a source:  http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010525.html .  Is straightdope.com good for citations?  Kfor (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for use in Chanel No. 5 

message: "3 to 10 lb" is not the same that "1 to 5 kg". I don't know how to correct the mistake...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.6.100 (talk) 13:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math suggestion 

message: "3 to 10 lb" is not the same that "1 to 5 kg", but I don't know the true value.
Carlo  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.6.100 (talk) 13:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it according to the values given by Google (searched for "10 lb in kg"). Anrie (talk) 09:54, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math consideration 

message: The article implies that SARS came from civets that were hunted.  In fact, the infected civets were raised in captivity.  Keeping these animals in captivity increases their suscepibility to disease and being kept in close contact with one another aids in the spread of disease.  --The Four Deuces (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This was later debunked after genetic analysis, as explained in the SARS entry. The text should be updated to include this (or the SARS mention could just be eliminated).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.71.51.33 (talk) 01:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The connection of the human consumption of civets (captivity or hunted) with SARS is well established, and should be included in this article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SARS 

message: Could someone please add information about their diet and reproduction. 
Gatorgirl7563 (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple suggestions 

message: As with SARS, current theories suggest COVID-19 transmission of COVID-19 from civet cats (that were infected from bats) to human. 84.205.241.2 (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Can transmit COVID-19 coronavirus?
Talk:W. C. Little Elementary School

message: My, this page needs work... any takers? Possibly alumnists, teachers... Doodledoo 16:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goodness
Talk:Monkton, Kent

message: There is a single (and dead) link on this article with no indication of it's significance.  I'm going to remove it but am open to this being reversed if someone can clarify what it is there for.  --Lord Matt (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Monkton is both a civil parish and a village - not a hamlet since it has a church. Peter Shearan (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil parish

message: This is less a full comment and more a place to share thoughts that need work before being worthy of being in the article. 
Monkton has a nature reserve in an old chalk quarry. The quarry was used to supply the building of *I must find out* and was active from ???? to ??? when ????. It opened as a nature reserve in ???? and it is maintain by ????.
I need to locate the details and sources as yet. Feel free to suggest as you are able.  --Lord Matt (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  notes
Talk:Duchy of Württemberg

message: The page is a good start. One possible extension would be to describe the internal administration of the duchy: its districts (from judicial, legislative and military viewpoints), minor nobility, economic issues (industries, agricultural output), strategic issues (results of thirty years war, etc.)24.11.170.191 (talk) 12:57, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I, the article author, am an American and native speaker of English. Forgive me for the lack of content at present, but my attention as of time of writing elsewhere. –Vami_IV✠ 23:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add information about internal administration 

message: The article says its gone untill 1803 but the last duke explaines here is Charles Alexander, Duke of Württemberg just ruling untill 1737! Missing dukes from 1737-1803! --178.197.230.81 (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gap in list uf dukes
Talk:Greenhill, Kent

message: I would question the words "over the years" regarding the growth of this settlement. It looks, from the pattern on the ordnance map exactly as if it were all built as one estate. Was there a village - or hamlet - here before that? I have amended the article to show it as an outlying part of Herne Bay, although I am not from that end of Kent. If anyone knows any better, it should be shown why, please. The Thanet Way now, of course, lies further south, so the comment there has also been amended.
Peter Shearan (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There has always been a church in Greenhill...as far as I am aware. There's been one all the time I've resided here. —— Ryan (t)•(c)•(review me!) 11:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Dean College

message: The article relates that more than a "baker's dozen" of home countries contribute students to the college.  I suggest changing baker's dozen to the conventional dozen.  After all, a modification of dozen by baker's exhorts to us that students don't hail from more than a mere 12 foreign lands, but from more than 13. It reads comical -- and I question whether that's what is needed for this kind of article.  (I won't just barge ahead with a change, though, because I'm not the author and it's only a style question.)  :)  Eyecicle (talk) 08:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baker's Dozen (First Paragraph) 
Talk:University of Bristol admissions controversy

message: Is "row" really an appropriate word for the title? I'm a speaker of American English, so I'm quite possibly wrong, but I've always thought the term "row" was rather informal and almost slang. If it is, the title should be termed more academically. Dylan (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Following peer review it has been suggested that this is in fact a controversy rather than a dispute or a row. Rename ! Francium12 (talk) 01:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Row" 

message: I have put this in for GA nomination. I am slowly getting to the facts of the controversy and getting past some of the rhetoric  Francium12  21:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA nomination

message: I have decided not to list this article as a Good Article for reasons listed on the review page (linked in the template above; see the bottom of the review page for my final comments). Happy editing! — DroEsperanto (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 
Talk:Sugar Busters!

message: I found a site with the complete exact same information here. The website is http://www.betterhealthusa.com/public/252.cfm. Rainbow puppy 16:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed.  I've removed the copy/pasted info.  -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy & Paste?! 

message: According to the glycemic index page, carrots are no longer considered high on the index.  This page says that they are.  Should this be changed to reflect the information on the other page, which I would presume to be kept more accurate on the index?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.39.63 (talk) 04:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information? 

message: Data is either missing or incorrect for that assertion 2600:1700:1409:7750:3CC9:445B:A739:4548 (talk) 23:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No verifiable source that it increases risk for heart disease
Talk:Iris Recognition Immigration System

message: I think I've dodged up the categories for this one, but I don't think I know enough about the subject so I can't fix it. Still, some categories are better than none, right? :S Lottie 16:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: The name Iris Recognition Immigration System is an example of a recursive acronym. debater (talk) 07:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Community sanction/Header

message: About the noticebox, which part do you disagree with? Navou banter / contribs 16:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Slim, WP:VOTE is the applicable guidline for not voting in this case.  WP:BAN is the applicable guideline for not voting also.  Consensus is not polling. Navou banter / contribs 13:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that in general it's good to point out that a mere votecount is insufficient to ban anyone. Otherwise this would just encourage people to pileup against some editor they don't like. Radiant! 14:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the header 

message: We do need to direct people to WP:ANI.  I've sene several recent misfilings of  cases that belonged, at most, on WP:ANI.  I've explained on Navou's talk page:
: 'I've restored that strong wording at the very top because I think it needs to be spelled out. Several recent discussions started on the noticeboard have been by people who just want someone blocked, and when you examine the target of the request it emerges that they've never even been blocked before. --Tony Sidaway 20:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense, I have also added what I believe to be some clarification. Navou banter 20:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The wording of the header
Talk:Warlock (Artemis Fowl)

message: I am sure that warlocks do run out of magic, because in the Arctic Incident, after the battle between the LEP and the goblins, one of the officers (possibly Commander Root) says that the warlock medics were out of magic and that there were no more medipacs.
I was not completely sure so I didn't change the page, but someone who is sure could change it instead (please!) :>
Phoenix25 16:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled