lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Honda CB450

message: The photograph pictures a bike with what appears to be a disk brake on the front wheel. My distinct recollection of the CB450 I drove back in 1969 was that it had drum brakes, twin leading shoes both ends. I have to say the colour scheme of the photographed model is also rather odd. Is it a customised model?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by OomSimon (talk • contribs) 13:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brakes

message: I have expanded the article using secondary sources from my own collection. I have replaced the previous image, stated to be a 1974 K4, with what I feel is better for the article as the majority of the previous and newly-expanded prose concerns the Black Bomber K0 
I have tried to keep the original prose and my contributions segregated, extending this approach into the infobox with my own inline citations  to differentiate the sources and specs. This results in more inline citation boxes in the infobox than is desirable, but I've done this before and it's acceptable
If any future contributor wishes to add sections for newer derivatives then a second info box can be added. I don't have any sources for these newer models, so I'm unable to further-expand the article. Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded article

message: It's a ptwin, not sure if it's 180 degrees or 360?
360 will fire one cylinder after the other in continuous order.
180 will fire one, then the other, and have 2 pause strokes, before the first one fires up again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.244.177.78 (talk) 00:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article lead section states "180° straight twin" (which I did not write), cited by an American website. The 1965 Motor Cycle (UK magazine) road test in my house states in its lead section (in emboldened text) "180–degree crankshaft", and in the specification section "parallel twin", which was the standard British expression. My understanding is that CB prefixed models had 180 crank throws.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  180 or 360?
Talk:Suzuki GT750

message: I'm not sure how to do this, but part of the info is misleading. A "total loss" oil system typically refers to older design 4 stroke motors where there is no valve cover. The top end of the motor has oil pumped to it(typically valves, valve springs, pushrods or cams) and then the oil just drips or blows off. The term does not apply to 2 stroke engines. Typically 2 stroke engines oil the crankshaft & connecting rod bearings and piston by either oil that is mixed with the gas or injected  straight to the bearings. In either case, the oil does not accumulated, but gets sucked up and burned in the combustion chamber. Some 2 Strokes mix oil with gas in the gas tank, others inject the oil between the carb and the piston where it gets mixed with the gas/air mixture. The GT750 both injected oil directly to the bearings and piston and injected it between the carb and piston. Two strokes typically burn more oil than 4 strokes, but not always. The GT750 could do 500-800 miles on a quart. 
Thom Boswell
thomboz@yahoo.com  
The two stroke lubrication system is also "total loss", so the article is fine as far as I'm concerned. Sle (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

message: My 1972 GT750J had a cooling fan behind the radiator.  One summer day in New Orleans, with a temperature of of 90+ F, I wanted to see when the fan would switch on.  I left the bike idling in the afternoon sun.  After about 30 minutes, the temperature gauge had slowly moved to about 3/4 when the fan came on.  In less than a minute, the gauge was below 1/2, which was normal operating temperature, and the fan switched off.  The 1973 model had no fan. 98.201.113.246 (talk) 02:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan
Talk:Random compact set

message: "Put another way, a random compact set is a measurable function K \colon \Omega \to 2^{M} such that K(\omega) is almost surely compact and
:\omega \mapsto \inf_{b \in K(\omega)} d(x, b)
is a measurable function for every x \in M."
This is not obvious. And the phrase "put another way" might be obscuring the true logical relationship between the definition proper and this new statement.. Does the statement about the distance function to a random set being measurable follow from the measurability of K? Is it equivalent to it? In the latter case, shouldn't we remove the stipulation that K is a measurable function from the above formulation?
50.255.2.98 (talk) 22:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition includes a proposition without acknowledging it ?
Talk:Spectrum (band)

message: There's another band called Spectrum, that was around in the UK at the end of the 60's.
There is an compilation album by "The Spectrum" called "The light is dark enough" which, strangely, contains I'll Be Gone and Launching Space, Part 2. See this link: Albums by The Spectrum.
I have in my possession the 7" 45 with "Free" and "The Tale of Wally Toft" on it, on RCA (first record I ever bought).
Here's a link to their singles:
:UK Single List 1966-72
as you see it's all RCA, no Harvest there, and they clearly date from before the Australian Spectrum started up.
By all accounts they weren't all that good, apart from The Tale of Wally Toft which is utterly, utterly beautiful.
Seems to me that I'll Be Gone and Launching Space Part 2 have got onto this album by mistake, as they are plainly not the same band at all.
Worth mentioning this, so as to clarify some of this confusion? --WestwoodMatt (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yet another Spectrum? 

message: A big, rambling story has been told in this article. Who wrote it? Where did the quotes come from? How can I begin to believe any of it? I mean, not even one citation or reference is given to justify this article's existence on Wikipedia. Don't get me wrong, I want to believe it, by the sounds of it nothing extraordinary happened to this band in their lifetime, so it might be hard to check the truth behind nothing. SpencerCollins (talk) 14:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:WEGX

message: Eagle 106 was NEVER "CHuRban", was it? Wasn't it always mainstream top 40, with a lean toward Hot AC in its final year? Q102 was the urban/dance-leaning top 40 station, and Eagle was "the anti-Q". DStroyer (talk) 02:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pat Scully

message: Scully scored 11 league goals in the 1997/98 season so I think the comment on his goalscoring prowess is accurate and the [citation needed] can be removed. RedsIndependent.com 23:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is wholly inaccurate and possibly libellous. Scully did not play for Arsenal's first team (for example you will see that on http://www.arsenal.com/history/arsenal-player-database?letter=S - the club's official record of every player who ever played for the first team, that he does not appear. The suggestion that Tony Adams could not play on occasions because of alcohol abuse is not substantiated, and there is no evidence anywhere else to this effect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.22.190 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved comment from the article 
Talk:List of volcanoes in Australia

message: The list doesn't look complete Mt Buninyong in Victoria is not in the list. 202.81.18.30 (talk) 06:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Mount Sugarloaf in New South Wales is listed as volcanic.  Is this correct or is it a mistake for Mount Sugarloaf in Victoria ? Gubernatoria (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mount Sugarloaf

message: I do not have the time make many changes to this article but if someone has or borrows a copy of "Intraplate Volcanism in Eastern Australia and New Zealand" by Johnson (eds.) and contributed to by 59 different geologists, they can make this article so much better. Age dates have been published in various scientific journals and are summarised in this book. However, since we know so little about most Australian volcanoes we are learning more things all the time. For instance the Central Volcanic Province in NSW (incorrectly referred to in the article as Central Volcano) has recently been resolved into three different geological units with a major volcanic centre identified at Maybole (near Glen Innes)... this is really a new volcano in the correct sense of the word. Yendor of yinn (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation 

message: The first title has been "Australian mainland and Tasmania" for a long time, but no mention of Tasmania (or NT or ACT) has ever been included. I have changed the title to reflect the current lists, but we're missing volcano sites in these places, or a note that there are none. Mark Hurd (talk) 09:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tasmania 

message: Are there any active volcanoes in Australia?
	
No there are not any ACTIVE volcanoes in australia but there are extinct volcanoes.
	
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? Why?
	
I think that this is a good thing because we will therefore have less damage to our continent compared to other parts of the world were volcanoes are common.
User:124.191.166.254 5:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q&A added to article by [[User:124.191.166.254]] 
Talk:The Ground Truth

message: The film's working title was: The Ground Truth: The Human Cost of War.
The film's title, on release was: The Ground Truth: After the Killing Ends.
The new title is: The Ground Truth.Dogru144 01:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarifying the film's title

message: Some editors have cut out categories and technical details.  What could possibly be controversial about these matters? Dogru144 02:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious edits: categories, other

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 09:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag
Talk:List of Ace Attorney characters

message: Suggesting to merge Ema Skye and Trucy Wright as both articles have had notability complaints for quite some time, and the reception sections feel minimal at best with most being comparison between the games themselves.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposals 

message: The redirect Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney(Minor Characters) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney(Minor Characters)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Madame Lovetap has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Madame Lovetap]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Polly Justice has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Polly Justice]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Mala Noche

message: The Portland Oregon band Border Crossing provided part of the soundtrack for the Gus Van Sant film 'Mala Noche.' That fact was overlooked in the discussion so I included it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.44.101 (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  soundtrack credit omission corrected 

message: what's the actual year? Mauriziok (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1985 or 1986 film?
Talk:Jutiapa, Jutiapa

message: *Oppose. For each of the municipalities in each of the departments of the Central American countries, there is a Wikipedia article. The development of each is slow, partly because there are few Wikipedians in those countries and few Wikipedians who know about those countries on that level of detail, so right now there's not a lot in this article about the town of Jutiapa. However, the article "Jutiapa, Jutiapa" is distinct from the article on the department of Jutiapa in the same way that "New York, New York" is separate from New York as a state. Lawikitejana 00:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:The Pineapple Thief

message: Not sure if there is a problem with this, but the entire text of this article appears to be lifted from the artist's web site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.96.106 (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem? 

message: Aren't they usually considered to belong to progressive rock rather?--mafutrct (talk) 19:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre 

message: "Since their debut album, the band has sold more than 35,000 records"
Oh my God. In ten years. What do they do for a living?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.76.78.201 (talk) 23:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success 
Talk:Honda CMX450

message: Was this bike also known as the Rebel 450? Respectfully, SamBlob 00:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

message: *  "Honda 450 Rebel and Suzuki Savage." Cycle World 25 (Oct 1986): 31(4)
--Dbratland (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources wanted
Talk:Holy Trinity Icon

message: This article contains a great deal of contradictory material--and I am hardly have the expertise to adjudicate.  In particular: "George Gabriel's writings on icons are heretical, as is this Wikipedia article."  Could a better source be found for the information? Perhaps something that is widely accepted in the Orthodox faith as well as scholarly work? Declaring a Wikipedia article heretical is clearly non NPOV.Samuelet (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved, tag removed John (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV dispute  

message: The capitalization of icon in the article's title implies that it is a Proper noun: about a particular object but it is not. Holy Trinity icon is not a very descriptive title either. I am proposing that it be changed to Holy Trinity iconography, but am open to other suggestions. Editor2020 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: AAARGH, no. Iconography is NOT the painting of icons. The title is fine, with lc "i", or "Holy Trinity in icons". Johnbod (talk) 02:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: So you are suggesting changing the title to either Holy Trinity icons or Holy Trinity in icons then? Anyone else? Editor2020 (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Short Sturgeon

message: Are S.A.1 and S.A.2 FAA or Shorts designations?
:Barnes' "Shorts Aircraft since 1900" states that the the S.A.1 and S.A.2 were initially assigned the "next vacant numbers in the design index" S.38 and S.39, but following Shorts' adoption in 1945 of the "universal designation system recommended by the S.B.A.C. ... the two designs were re-indexed as S.A.1 and S.A.2.; at the same time the official name Sturgeon was adopted, as S. Mk 1 and T.T. Mk2 respectively." So they are Shorts designations. --TraceyR (talk) 11:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: S.A.1

message: In view of the presence of the main specifications, is this tag still justified? --TraceyR (talk) 14:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Aero specs missing' tag 

message: The Sturgeon had a fairly complex development history which the existing text did not really clarify or reflect. It is less than clear if the Sturgeon was ever submitted to S.6/43, Tony Buttler's British Secret Projects 3 deals with the competitors to the S.6/43, S.11/43 and O.5/43 requirements in detail and he states, addressing claims in Barnes, that no official documentation exists to show that the Sturgeon was submitted to S.6/43, in which case it was never developed as a torpedo bomber, but only as the reconnaissance bomber required by S.11/43, in fact Barnes notes the Shorts designers were relieved not to have to design torpedo capability into the aircraft. Barnes does claim a submission was made to S.6/43, in fact he claims the Sturgeon won and S.11/43 was effectively the production requirement of S.6/43, but he appears to have been completely unaware S.11/43 was competed amongst several firms and makes no mention of O.5/43, probably because the relevant official documentation had not been released into the public domain at the time he was writing the original manuscript in 1967.
Buttler is also more explicit on the reason for the cancellation of the S.1, the suspension of the Audacious and Centaur class carriers, and this has been added to the text.
On other matters Barnes is consistent with the contemporary articles in Flight, and as Winchester appears to be heavily derived from Barnes, but include certain handling details that are not reflected by Barnes, the text and references have been amended to match Barnes. In particular Barnes is explicit that the handling problems of the S.B.3 derived from the exhaust of the Mambas and makes no mention of the nose in relation to these. The previous text claimed the nose was responsible, but then quoted text that only related to the engines.
Other changes have been made to standardise nomenclature which occasionally confused service and manufacturer designations and to clarify the relationship between the original Shorts design numbers (S.38 and S.39) and their later replacements with SBAC universal designations (S.A.1, S.A.2, S.B.3, S.B.9).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.175.21.192 (talk) 00:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking to clarify Development History
Talk:Paul Beneke

message: Hi - I have added a source link for the information and fleshed out the entry with links to other Wikipedia entries.  I hope this conforms? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merteuil (talk • contribs).
: Good enough for me. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 11:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:BookSmart

message: A much more sophisticated product article than we usually see, since it does have 3rd party references, If anyone wants to delete  it, please send it to AfD, for it may make for an interesting discussionDGG 00:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

message: from liblicense-l, the most important and authoritative electronic resources listserv, moderated by ann Okerson of the Yale University Library.  
http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0607/msg00274.html
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Print on Demand takes flight
From: "Jim O'Donnell" <provost@georgetown.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:48:30 EDT
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Marshall McLuhan said that new technologies are usually interpreted as just doing what older technologies do, just faster or cheaper or with less physical effort. This is a sign that POD will not just make it easier for "publishers" and even "vanity publishers" to do what they've been doing already, but for new players to do new things with bound codex artifacts that they will call "books". We'll need a different name for the "reviewed, selected, edited, and disseminated to a wide audience" thing we've called "book" lately. Full article free for registered NYTimes users.
Jim O'Donnell
Georgetown U.
*****
NYTimes 7/20/06
July 20, 2006
Technology Rewrites the Book
By PETER WAYNER [etc, ref in article]
DGG (talk) 10:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: from listserv

message: :Image:Blurb screengrab loRes.jpg is a poor screenshot - most of the space is devoted to the computer and the background. A straight screenshot would be more helpful without the other elements would be more helpful.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 23:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshot

message: A new version came out around May 28th 2009. It features significantly more flexibilit (you can adapt templates) and support for a new large-sized square book.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.61.82.151 (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BookSmart 2.0
Talk:Os Grandes Portugueses

message: Hi, João! Seems you had the same idea as me... but beat me to it ;) But I'm taking the chance while it's a fresh article to know if you think the article should be renamed to "Os Grandes Portugueses" as it is written on it's website . Parutakupiu talk || contribs 00:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Whipple's disease

message: Who is credited for discovering that Tropheryma whipplei causes Whipple's disease? ReasonableLogicalMan(Talk 20:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: seems to be the publication of relevance, although various groups were looking at bacterial rRNA prior to this result. JFW | T@lk 15:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: closes the circle: T. whipplei was detected in biopsies from Whipple's original 1907 patient! JFW | T@lk 15:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: The most recent reviews on this condition are:
*  - Lancet Infect Dis 2008
*  - Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008
*  - N Engl J Med 2007
Citing Didier Raoult at least once is going to be inevitable :-). JFW | T@lk 11:14, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Primary source: immune reconstitution syndrome happens in about 10% and can be nasty: link. JFW | T@lk 22:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reviews 

message: Looking through, there are some statements that seem inaccurate and some that are not properly sourced.
Under the section "Diagnosis" - skin rashes are quoted as a clinical manifestation. 
I am  not familiar with this as a symptom, and cannot find this in any source, including the one cited (a french article, there are many perfectly good English reviews to cite in an English encyclopedia...) I will now correct this.
I will also post about any other corrections.  
Treatment is also out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibenami (talk • contribs) 23:12, 17 July 2014
:Hello  - I believe the rashes are mentioned in an old source. I agree that the article is in need of updating; I've listed some reviews above but I never got round to improving the article.
:Feel free to fix whatever is necessary and let me know if you need a hand! JFW | T@lk 15:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some inaccuracies, sources? 

message: doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00128-1 JFW | T@lk 04:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review