Talk:Smurl haunting

message: The tone of this article is 
far from neutral.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.232.41 (talk) 18:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You might give a hint as to specific neutrality problems and how you think they might be improved before tagging it again. - LuckyLouie (talk) 21:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

text: The Wilkes-Barre Times Leader source article isn't gone, it's just archived. I don't see anything wrong with summarizing what's contained in this source, e.g. Smurl's reported surgery. Do you have reliable sources that say differently? As for the dates the "demons" supposedly first arrived and who first claimed they did, do you have any reliable sources for that? And it would help if you refrain from taunts or personal attacks such as "Weasel much?" when discussing the article on this Talk page. Thanks! - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: BTW, every time I see this article, I first read "Smurf hunting". --Hob Gadling 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Breaking from the usual tradition of someone putting copyrighted material into Wikipedia, we have here a case where someone created a derivative work of Wikipedia without license. (i.e. they are not honoring the GFDL) 
McDowellNews
Real class eh?
Entropyfails 19:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Infringement of this Article 

message: "As to whether the haunting was genuine or an elaborate hoax is open to debate."  I don't see any deabte here, so much as a few unsubstantiated claims that laugh in the face of the sort of facts and reason that Wikipedia is built on.   Any thoughts regarding removing this and cleaning up the article?  Alvis 17:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all for it. --Hob Gadling 14:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm all for including more references that this is all a hoax.: Flora
 
The unprofessional and blatantly biased way this page has been presented and edited is exactly why no one trusts wikipedia. You clowns are a huge joke!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.52.148 (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate? 

message: Just move to Paranormal phenomenona/Ghost stories.
We don't need conspiracy theories about wiki mods cooperating with entities
from the other side. ^_^
Hello,
My name is John Cifarelli, Paranormal Investigator and Psychic/Medium for my New Jersey Paranormal Research. 
I have been sensing that there are still presences in the home with the Smurl family lives. If anyone can give me information on how i can contact them i would like to speak to them ASAP. Thank You.
John Cifarelli
New Jersey Paranormal Research and HeadQuarters. 201-360-0297
:As a psychic, wouldn't you already know that information? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.11.113.30 (talk) 18:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't delete 

message: I just changed the end of the second-to-last sentence to read "...at the campground where they were staying."  That anyone could publish "...at the campground they were staying at" is really more frightening than anything reported by the Smurls. Rt3368 16:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *More frightening yet is that someone with such poor grammatical skills can edit here! Jororo05 (talk) 01:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Small Change 

message: This haunting finally got terminated by The Church, the Catholic Church terminated this haunting. 65.173.104.52 (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would love to see some cites for this statement. I'm not choosing sides either way, but evidence is needed. Jororo05 (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax my ASS

message: I came to this article from the article on Bishop Robert McKenna OP which says "He attempted exorcisms in the Smurl haunting case, which case was described in various books and in the Fox TV-movie The Haunted."  I think it would help this article to put this information in, and specify which of the attempts (where "priest" is mentioned, not bishop) was his.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishop Robert McKenna OP 

message: Hi @User:TSlatter.  This is contained in the cited source, so no need for "citation needed tags". Thanks! - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation not needed