Talk:THQ

message: needs to be part of this article. How did they become such a huge publisher? Tehw1k1 03:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the company 

message: Shouldn't this be listed under upcoming games considering how awesome it is that they're making a new one?68.55.150.25 (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeworld 3 

message: Isn't that a bethesda game?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.198.96 (talk) 22:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vigil Games and Elder Scrolls: Morrowing 

message: Their profile seems to be highly focussed on the acclaim and position of Saints Row. Could use some cleaning up. 24.76.161.157 (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volition 

message: http://www.n-europe.com/news.php?nid=12820
not sure how valid this link is  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.182.57 (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  shutting down? 

message: Is there a source for the 40k MMO as a 2009 release?  I've seen nothing other than it's still being in the planning phase, without a set release date, or any actual details of the game. Gnarlyhotep (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and removed it from the list of 2009 release games.  There's no source that I can find, and both THQ and Vigil game's webpages list no release information on it.Gnarlyhotep (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  40k MMO? 

message: Call me crazy, but I don't think THQ has had anything to do with Call of Duty as the summary states... Cuardaitheoir (talk) 09:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call of Duty!? 

message: It's listed on here that THQ is bringing out 'WWE Brawl' in 2012, but I can't see anywhere that confirms it. Pretty sure it's old news and won't be created anymore. (Brawl lists PS2 as a platform, yet WWE 12' doesn't even cover the PS2, so why would Brawl cover it?)
Just thought I'd give a heads up before it gets edited. --Darkside05 (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming THQ Games 

message: As an IP, I cannot upload a photo, can someone upload this file for the thumbnail on the page?? 99.240.231.32 (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: - M0rphzone (talk) 07:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old THQ logo 

message: Kokopeli, a company responsible for games like In the Hunt and Robopit on the Sega Saturn redirects here, but it isn't explained why. Is there a good reason? Is it a mistake?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.220.98 (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kokopeli 

message: Here's a great article on Polygon about how mismanagement, incompetence and pride killed THQ's Kaos Studios. We should create new sections and expand on the development and disasters of Homefront and uDraw. - M0rphzone (talk) 07:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great reference to use 

message: This whole article reads like an ad. I don't trust a word of it. 70.180.188.238 (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In what way does the article read like an advertisement? Primogen (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Then rewrite it. And clearly you don't seem to see that this is incomplete and based off of company reports. The article needs to be converted into paragraph format, and is far from being complete. - M0rphzone (talk) 04:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an ad? 

message: Folks - there have been numerous editors attempting to add unverifiable information to this article with relation to THQ's current status. Their stock is still traded on the OTC market. The company is still in the midst of bankruptcy proceedings. The company still has employees. For these reasons (and others), it is not appropriate to mark this company as being out of business, disestablished, defunct, etc. The disestablished category is not yet appropriate. Adding fate or defunct year to the infobox is also not appropriate at this time. If others disagree, please provide verification to the contrary and let's discuss here. Thank you. Pjhansen (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  THQ is not (yet) disestablished 

message: Why isn't there a picture of the 1989–1994 THQ logo in this article? 71.95.61.24 (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 1989–1994 THQ logo 

message: I need help with the citations of all the THQ subsidiaries listed, some of them are hard to find on Google Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 10:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  THQ Subsidiaries Citation 

message: Change "In 1997, THQ was reincorporated as a Delaware Corporation,[8] and acquired San Diego video game developer Pacific Coast Power & Light.[11]" to "In 1997, THQ was reincorporated as a Delaware Corporation,[8] and in 1999 acquired Santa Clara video game developer Pacific Coast Power & Light.[11]" 
The Link provided for reference #11 (http://articles.latimes.com/1999/jun/01/local/me-43070) in the article calls PCP&L a San Jose, not San Diego company, and the year is 1999 not 1997. To be more accurate, the merger was on May 10th, 1999, and Pacific Coast Power and Light was based out of Santa Clara as shown on MobyGames (and I worked there back in 1999-2002).
https://www.mobygames.com/company/locomotive-games-inc 76.198.129.251 (talk) 06:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: The date of 1999 was given and San Diego was changed but to San Jose and not Santa Clara, since this is not what the source says. They may have had different offices in both cities.  Spintendo  19:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 November 2018 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Spongebob SquarePants: Bikini Bottom Nightmare. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 3#Spongebob SquarePants: Bikini Bottom Nightmare until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 00:27, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spongebob SquarePants: Bikini Bottom Nightmare" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]