lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brentwood Academy

message: If someone adds a section on athletics or academics, it is worth noting that James Wilhoit is a a teacher and coach at the school.
Billhpike (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a notable faculty section and included Wilhoit and a couple of others. Jacona (talk) 14:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Faculty

message: Hi there. The opening of this article and most of the existing content appears to be one-sided and doesn't tell the whole story of the schools history. I'd like to add some additional context to the history of Brentwood Academy, something like:
Founded in 1969, Brentwood Academy is a top-rated, Christian private school in Brentwood, Tennessee with the objective of providing Christ-centered education to young people through individualized instruction. The charter of Brentwood Academy was signed on November 20, 1969 after ten acres of land on Granny White Pike was gifted by Tom P. Kennedy, JR.
A handful of classrooms, a science laboratory, boys’ and girls’ dressing rooms, administrative offices, and a commons area made up the first building which was completed in August, 1970. Classes began in September of 1970 and the first class of students selected the eagle mascot and school colors of red, white, and blue school.
The school currently has 710 students enrolled, with an average tuition of approximately $29,000. Students in grades 6-12 experience a seven to one student-teacher ratio and 99% of all graduates go on to a four year college or university. 
Minority enrollment makes up 18.5% percent of Brentwood Academy’s student population and the following is published as the school’s diversity statement:
We believe that all persons are created in the image of God and have immeasurable worth in His eyes. We are committed to cultivating mutual respect, celebrating God-given differences, and building up the body according to the truths of scripture. In the fulfillment of our Mission, we believe and teach that we are a diverse and united community that values each other uniquely. We are preparing students to engage the world with compassion, awareness, and sensitivity.
Can someone help me understand how to best edit or insert this information?
SirTenChanges (talk) 13:51, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page edits for Brentwood Academy
Talk:Beetley

message: Some dates would be useful in the first two sentences of this section. The manor of Elmham existed at the time of the Domesday book of 1086 (fact taken from the parish council article).  It is hard to figure out when Beesley and Gressingham were separated into two parishes. From what is said in Wikipedia it could have been anywhere between 1086 and 1935. The parish council article mentions an Enclosure Act of 1774. It would be logical that the division happened at this time although this is not made clear. 
Looking at Ordnance Survey boundary maps such as http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/maps/sheet/os_maps_1900/Norfolk_1900 and http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/maps/sheet/os_maps_revised_1944/Norfolk_1931_1944, the boundary between Beesley and Gressingham is most unusual. Why? This would be a good fact to include in your article.
--Oldontarian (talk) 10:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section of article
Talk:Belbroughton Road

message: I have removed the claim "desirable residential area" as this is opinion not fact, it probably is a desirable place but that does not make WP the place to say so - see WP:WEASEL. Likewise "very high house prices" - high in relation to what? Zoopla does not say they are high, simply that the Z-index is £2m+. Such a claim would need to be substantiated by, say, a newspaper article ranking the street in a list of expensive places to buy houses. I have also removed the reference as the link only points to the zoopla.co.uk main page which imo would make it further reading rather than a source. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 23:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoopla reference
Talk:Belle Isle (Windermere)

message: I added some sources today.Wipsenade (talk) 10:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Float-out

message: I wouldn't write that the naming ceremonies of some special ships are after the float-out. Today, the most passenger ships get their naming ceremonies much later after the float-ot. 87.184.210.74 (talk) 19:55, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming ceremony 
Talk:Belmont, East Sussex

message: As per guidelines at WP:UKCITIES I suggest that this one line article be merged into its Civil Parish article. Although the coordinates put Belmont as part of Hastings, I cannot find any reference to Belmont on a map?  MortimerCat (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Belmont?
Talk:Belmont, Lancashire

message: Please only add section headers when there is some content  J3Mrs (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Section headers
Talk:Bemerton

message: Given its literary connections shouldn't this being higher than "low inportance"?  I ask because I'd really like to know more about the place myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horis (talk • contribs) 11:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Landskrona

message: I'm too lazy right now, but s.o. should create a gallery instead of those dreadful huge pics. -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 
Talk:Emmerson (musician)

message: This is the only place where I have seen is name spelled "Emerson".  Every other place spells it Emmerson.  Are we sure this page is correct? --Aranae (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, his official page spells it with two Ms as well. 亮HH (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

text: "Emerson" is indeed a misspelling, and this has been corrected. —Ringbang (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Emerson or Emmerson?
Talk:Pavel Jacobi

message: See Portal_talk:Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board#Pavel_Jacobi_and_January_Uprising Alex Bakharev 23:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland#Pavel Jacobi and January Uprising for an update. Narky Blert (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Keister (footballer, born 1970)

message: "Keister started his career at South American side Tigres" - "South American" is spectacularly vague, surely someone must have an idea what country it was in?  Also, is it definitely true, as it's slightly bizarre that a guy from Manchester with no Latino connection would start his professional career in South America...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see his profile on the Dover website refers to "Tigres (Brazil)".  The only club I have been able to locate thus far that would fit that description is Esporte Clube Tigres do Brasil, but that club wasn't founded until 2004, years after Keister supposedly played in Brazil..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2010 Non-League Club Directory specifically states that this Tigres was a club in Sierra Leone.  That would make more sense (given that he's a SL international so clearly has roots/family there) than the rather random claim that he went and played in Brazil..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 
Talk:Ben Rice (author)

message: I have commenced a Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Ben Tozer

message: dont think he 'currently plays' for newcastle as even if he has definately signs for the toon, he would still be a swindon player until 1st jan?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.90.232.145 (talk) 10:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mutsumi Hojo

message: From what I can tell, and it's possible I'm wrong, I believe his anime name is simply Saburou and not Mutsumi Saburou... no family name given. And anyway, Saburou is typically a given name, so if anything his anime family name is still Hojo (more than likely). Seigi Choujin 23:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anime name

message: I would like to rename the page Mutsumi Hojo, as that is his original manga name and since no one has proven that his anime name is indeed Mutsumi Saburo instead of just Saburo. Seigi Choujin (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Mutsumi Hojo
Talk:Benington, Hertfordshire

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have found this page via a search for the village manor house and i am disgusted with the poor quality of the page!! I have added some categories into the page to promote development but I think someone who actually knows the place needs to have a good go at developing the page! We in Lancashire have many pages for our villages such as Bretherton, Banks and Tarleton which as you will agree are of a much better standard. Maybe take this to your wiki project for some ideas of improvement. Thanks JMRH6 (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urgent Attention needed!! 
Talk:Defence Intelligence Organisation

message: Please note the correct spelling of defence/defense in this context is defence, as this is an article about an Australian organisation and hence follows British, not American, spelling. See here for more information. DirectEdge 23:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to non-Australian editors 

message: DirectEdge, after the
Herald made inquiries into the Wikiscanner scandal at the Department of Defence, the department said it would ban Defence staff from accessing the encyclopedia. Why are you still editing Wikipedia?
Felize  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felize (talk • contribs) 00:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Because I don't work for the Department of Defence... DirectEdge 00:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to DirectEdge
Talk:Coal Creek, Indiana

message: Every reference since 1864 (when postmaster Samuel Snoddy gave his name to the mill on Coal Creek) cites the name of this location as "Snoddy's Mills" and never "Snoopys Mills." Ronald L. Baker and Marvin Carmony included the name of the location in their printed compilation of Hoosier place names "Indiana Place Names." When the list was digitized, an error of transcription occurred which transformed the word "Snoddy" into "Snoopy." The U.S. Geological Survey used this erroneous spelling in their geonames.usgs.gov web page for Coal Creek. Do not cite the USGS web page as it includes the transcription error as a variant name.
I have physically traveled to Coal Creek and verified the spelling is in fact "Snoddy's Mills." Do not use the variant "Snoopy's Mills" because it is inaccurate.
Revzack (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snoopys Mills Transcription Error
Talk:Bere Alston

message: The article contains this under Architecture: "The Bere Alston Reform Church on Fore Street is worshiping a false religion."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.181.25.30 (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Needed? 
Talk:Berinsfield

message: Berinsfield has a longer history than that (but not in it's present form) - there has been a settlement on the site of Beinsfield since at least anglo-saxon times - Oxford University exavated an anglo-saxon cemetry there in 1974.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.221.97 (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

message: For some reason, the article doesn't mention the most significant fact about Berinsfield, which is that it is actually a big council estate built in the middle of nowhere originally by Bullingdon Rural District Council. --Ef80 (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Council estate 
Talk:Berkswich

message: According to maps (e.g. http://www.spcaonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/staffordparishmap070108.jpg) Berkswich Civil Parish includes Walton-on-the-Hill and Milford, but not Baswich, Wildwood or Weeping Cross. The OS maps show the same boundaries.
The ancient parish includes the civil parishes of Acton Trusnell and Bednall, Berkswich, and Brocton, and the Baswich and Weeping Cross wards in the unparished areas of the Borough of Stafford.
The same apparent error is repeated in the Baswich article. Lavateraguy (talk) 08:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries
Talk:Bernard Docker

message: More needs to be written about the earlier life of Bernard Docker, including what he did during the War, and probably including the building of Shemara and something about the Green Goddess. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 10:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More content needed

message: This looks close to the most mangled I’ve ever seen. There are 14 cites that aren’t used, and Lady D’s memoir appears no fewer than 15 times! KJP1 (talk) 10:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Now slightly less of a horror show. KJP1 (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing
Talk:Berrier

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 17:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link
Talk:Chasmogamy

message: Chasmogamy is presented as a "botanical term describing a type of flower", however, this is not accurate. Chasmogamy is a reproductive method that utilizes chasmogamous flowers. Chasmogamous is what refers to the actual flower type. I think it would be beneficial to explain this. 
The first paragraph states that "the flower undergoes cross-pollination". However, this isn't always true, as chasmogamous flowers do self-fertilize. This is mentioned at the bottom, second to last paragraph of the article, but I think it is confusing to have the two remarks separated instead of stating in one sentence that chasmogamous flowers are capable of both cross-pollinating and self-fertilization. 
Also, chasmogamous flowers do provide pollen to other chasmogamous flowers, but the article does not specify that this pollen is received by chasmogamous flowers of the same species. It just states that pollen is provided to other "plants". I think making this distinction (eg. chasmogamous flowers also provide pollen to other chasmogamous flowers of the same species via pollinators) would aid in the overall understanding. 
There are a few typos in the article that make it hard to read. An example is in paragraph three, "cleistogamy is favored is stressful conditions...". 
The fourth reference is never cited in the text, and thus it is not possible to figure it out what information was obtained from that particular source. This is plagiarism.  
In general, I think the article's organization and formatting leads to the content being unclear and misleading. I also think that more content is needed to properly present the subject.
My major suggestions for this article would adding more content on chasmogamous flowers and changing the layout by dividing the article into subheadings of material. Each subheading could describe one major topic of chasmogamous flowers. Some example subheadings include: morphology, history (who discovered it, how was it named), modes of fertilization, advantages/disadvantages (genetic diversity vs. requiring large resources), etc. 
Introducing cleistogamy information in the very beginning and in the body of the main article takes away from the real subject matter of chasmogamous flowers. There is also too much cleistogamous content relative to chasmogamous (approximately 45% of the article is dedicated to information on cleistogamous flowers). I do think presenting cleistogamous flowers as a contrast to chasmogamous ones is informative and significant, but I think that cleistogamy should be presented at the end of the article and in much less detail than the chasmogamous content. For example, cleistogamy could be the last subheading and provide brief structural and ecological differences as well as a link leading a separate cleistogamy wikipedia page containing more information. As701914 (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Incorrect Information and Layout Suggestions
Talk:Middle East Command

message: There's a tag asking for references but really this article is just summarising bits from the "See also" articles. Provided they are adequately referenced this article doesn't really need references (unless you are a masochist in which case feel free to get working and transposing them to this article)! Stephen Kirrage talk - contribs 23:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the tag as i have just expanded the background information on the Command and have referanced it. I do feel chunks of this article should have adequate citations to support claims made i.e. who the commanding officers were etc but do generally support you on the grounds that elsewhere it is just summing up other articles.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Coleonema

message: I'm a physician, not a botanist, but I believe I am correct in changing the family from Rhamnaceae to Rutaceae. There seems to be a lot of confusion about the correct classification of this genus, some respectable sources, including Wikipedia, giving Rhamnaceae, and others, including the RHS Dictionary of Gardening, giving Verbenaceae. However, most current authorities, including PlantSystematics.org,  Encyclopaedia of Life and the four references cited in the article all give Rutaceae.
Adawson13 (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

message: The placement of this genus may be controversial but the family Rutaceae is in the order Sapindales, not order Rosales which this article has placed it in  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.246.26.169 (talk) 05:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect taxonomy 

message: Quoting AVH "There is no international convention governing the way common names can be written or used." In Australia pulchellum occurs as 99.999... of the genus. As the article states, it is incorrect to refer to the scientific name of the genus as Diosma, but feel free to refer to the common name of the genus as Diosma, or, if necessary, diosma (with a small d).--Lmstearn (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly Referred to as Diosma?
Talk:Three Kingdoms period

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Warring States Period - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Besthorpe, Nottinghamshire

message: Charles Merriman the Younger committed suicide at Besthorpe Mll on 29 April 1901. His father, Charles Merriman, was the miller and the son worked as a miller in the mill, according to the 1901 Census Entry. As the father was elderly and in poor health the son was probably actually running the mill.
His death is recorded in the Newark Registration District, April-May-June Quarter 1901, Volume 7b, Page 255. The cause of death stated on the Death Certificate is "Suicide by cutting his throat with a razor during a fit of temporary insanity".
Charles Merriman the Elder died in 1902 having taken over Besthorpe mill about 1883. 
I am a Great Great Grandson of Charles Merriman the Elder.
Ollyop (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Merriman 

message: I have updated the page and added an infobox to it. Unfortunately, the map is showing Besthorpe to be in Lincolnshire in the wrong location and I am not sure how to fix it. If anyone does know how to fix it, then please do so. Thanks
AustinRedd007 (talk) 12:41, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Bheki Mseleku

message: I have a documentary where Bheki talks about his accident where he lost his fingers, he specifically says he was eight years old when this happens but i looked everywhere on the internet and couldn't find a published documentation of this , how do i reference this ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyshabangu (talk • contribs) 15:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: referencing
Talk:Baron Sinha

message: This quotation - and the whole line of argument that the second Lord Sinha was not eligible to sit because he was an Indian - is not in the Complete Peerage. Where is it from? Is it true? A citation is needed; especially since this page has been vandalized to make the British look prejudiced. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Rayment is useful; but the text needs rewriting if no other source is cited. The mention of polygamy in the decision, as Rayment quotes it, is obiter dictum; it does not show that the objection was raised, and remarks that Sinha's marriage always  was monogamous.Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we have reached what ought to be a stable text.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "potentially polygamous marriage"
Talk:Bevill's Leam

message: I was just looking at the coordinates and they are rather vague and have no N or W to signify longtitude and latitude. Please fix if you can. =]  DewsterMy Talk 18:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: Is Bevill's Leam really a village? I think it's just a drainage channel. See Streetmap. Bogbumper (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, incorrectly labelled a village - not even a hamlet as far as I can see, have redirected to Pondersbridge, the main settlement on the cutting. D. Lion West (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Village?
Talk:Bakthan Singaram

message: -> 100+ scholar results. Addhoc 00:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bewaldeth and Snittlegarth

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 09:59, 09 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: CCHT external link
Talk:Bewcastle

message: Not far of Hadrians wall is a small area that is a World Heritage Site. I seem to find it being 5 hectares or 12 acres in size. Although it is adjacent, or in proximity to the wall, is it maybe the smallest UNESCO site in Britain? --85.164.221.69 (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britains smallest? 

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take several years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT External link