Talk:2006 Pacific typhoon season/August

message: Navy's got 99W, now. --Patteroast 21:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: gone. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Came back again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This one looks like it could be something. bob rulz 09:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interestingly enough, it's not that far north of 98P. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 23:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ... and gone again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Back again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't post just for the sake of posting and boosting your edit count. If it's gone again and back again, you could've siad that with one edit, not three. Chacor 10:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: God, calm down! He saw that it was gone...how was he supposed to know that it was just going to come back up less than a minute later? If anything you're the one posting just for the sake of increasing your edit count here, which is a stupid and ridiculous accusation. Who even gives a damn if he posted twice? By the way, it was only two posts...think about what you say before you say it, please. You seem to be the only person here who cares. bob rulz 03:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you check the history? It was three. And NRL does remove storms, but hardly ever - I'd personally say NEVER - restores them within the same minute. And you're wrong about my being th eonly one who cares, so please at least make an attempt to find out the facts before posting and souncing uncivil. Chacor 03:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're the one who sounded uncivil with your post. Okay, maybe it was three posts. Maybe I just didn't care enough to check the edit history. If there's other people that care then why are you the only one getting all upset over it? Nobody should care how many edits it takes to do what. Main point: I doubt that he did it "just to increase his edit count." This is Wikipedia! This is an encyclopedia. It doesn't matter how many edits it takes to do what. I'm sure he's so sorry that he's just not as smart as you and may not know that "NRL rarely removes storm, yadda yadda yadda." He didn't see it on there, so naturally he thought it had been removed. He is not degrading the quality of anything by taking 3 edits to do what he did, and you are accomplishing nothing in telling him to "use less edits." You're just attacking him for something stupid and trivial. bob rulz 07:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NPA. Chacor 07:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I meant, WP:NPA means that your sentence "You're just attacking him for something stupid and trivial." isn't right. I know what the policy is. Chacor 07:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Last time I checked Wikipedia encouraged users to take as many posts as they need to do something, which means not attacking somebody for how many edits it takes to edit something. And I apologize if I attacked you in my post, I didn't mean for it to come out the way it did. bob rulz 00:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 99W.INVEST

message: NRL has 08W.NONAME up. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 20:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's official now. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 21:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JTWC has it as a TS now. Chacor 10:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks strong in the NRL page satellite photos. Alastor Moody (talk) 23:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 08W.NONAME

message: =====90W.INVEST=====
And there's this one, too. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 21:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that popped up since I went to look about five minutes ago! --Patteroast 21:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: gone. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Came back again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And gone again. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And back again! --Patteroast 07:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And gone again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Back again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It definitely looks like one. bob rulz 13:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah... well, at least JTWC says it's FAIR. But JTWC mentions it as a subtropical storm... hmm.Typhoonchaser 13:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: TCFA issued. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 18:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

text: You do realise that typhoons are bad, yes? You do realise it's a good thing this one won't affect the Philippines, yes? Then please, don't say it's "too bad". Maria is too far east of the AOR anyway. Chacor 03:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, I didn't mean for this storm to kill people in the Philippines. I meant that since it is out of PAGASA responsibility, it wouldn't be named "Juan", that's all. And also, when did I say I wanted this storm to kill people? Alastor Moody (talk) 05:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: No, I see it too. This thing almost looks like a typhoon already... bob rulz 07:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Satellite imagery shows some new bursts of convection around the eye, which is a lot better defined now than it was a couple hours ago. NRL at least agrees with the assessment that Maria is intensifying rapidly - their estimate is now 60 kt (it was 40 kt not long ago). NRL isn't official, but their estimates do give us an idea of what the storm's doing. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 09:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This storm may (or may not) reach minimal typhoon strength if waters and shear allows Maria to become a typhoon. Alastor Moody (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks perfect here  But it only exists for only a breif of time. Irfanfaiz 05:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I hear that the JTWC upgraded Maria into a minimal typhoon several hours ago, although the JMA rather saw it as a maximum STS. But will the JMA upgrade Maria into a typhoon after the season's end as post-analysis? Alastor Moody (talk) 05:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks like Maria's made landfall. It's taking on an extratropical appearance, as well. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, its hasn't made landfall yet, but guess it may be fully extratropical when it hits Japan; sort of reminds me of TS Beryl and Hurricane Ophelia from 2005:-) Alastor Moody (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if this will make landfall. It looks like it's going to move out to sea just beyond the coast. Either way it's a very weak storm now, and I'd be surprised if it did much damage. bob rulz 04:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actual, it will not make landfall (i bet Japan is in luck) and simply become extratropical which it is already doing. Alastor Moody (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The JMA now calls it as a minimal tropical storm, so I expect it to be declared as an extratropical depression by the next advisory issue (if they ever give one, but seems unlikely). Alastor Moody (talk) 03:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Well it seems to have come back, but Maria is sure clinging onto that minimal tropical storm status. And also, I think it may have been already extrtropical. It hardly has any warm core. Alastor Moody (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the cyclone phase diagrams say it's still warm-core, so I guess the JMA is right on by continuing advisories. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 01:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually its now an extratropical low, as the JMA has quit issuing advisories. Alastor Moody (talk) 06:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 09W.MARIA

message: And there's this one, too. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 21:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, that popped up since I went to look about five minutes ago! --Patteroast 21:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: gone. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Came back again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And gone again. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And back again! --Patteroast 07:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And gone again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Back again. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 90W.INVEST

message: JMA has upgraded 90W to a tropical depression. Chacor 12:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely looks like one. bob rulz 13:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TROPICAL DEPRESSION

message: JMA has named this system. JTWC does not recognise it as a TD even. Chacor 13:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah... well, at least JTWC says it's FAIR. But JTWC mentions it as a subtropical storm... hmm.Typhoonchaser 13:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: TCFA issued. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 18:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TS0607 MARIA

message: JTWC now has this as a TS, so new section added. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You do realise that typhoons are bad, yes? You do realise it's a good thing this one won't affect the Philippines, yes? Then please, don't say it's "too bad". Maria is too far east of the AOR anyway. Chacor 03:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, I didn't mean for this storm to kill people in the Philippines. I meant that since it is out of PAGASA responsibility, it wouldn't be named "Juan", that's all. And also, when did I say I wanted this storm to kill people? Alastor Moody (talk) 05:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: No, I see it too. This thing almost looks like a typhoon already... bob rulz 07:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Satellite imagery shows some new bursts of convection around the eye, which is a lot better defined now than it was a couple hours ago. NRL at least agrees with the assessment that Maria is intensifying rapidly - their estimate is now 60 kt (it was 40 kt not long ago). NRL isn't official, but their estimates do give us an idea of what the storm's doing. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 09:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This storm may (or may not) reach minimal typhoon strength if waters and shear allows Maria to become a typhoon. Alastor Moody (talk) 23:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks perfect here  But it only exists for only a breif of time. Irfanfaiz 05:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I hear that the JTWC upgraded Maria into a minimal typhoon several hours ago, although the JMA rather saw it as a maximum STS. But will the JMA upgrade Maria into a typhoon after the season's end as post-analysis? Alastor Moody (talk) 05:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks like Maria's made landfall. It's taking on an extratropical appearance, as well. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:29, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, its hasn't made landfall yet, but guess it may be fully extratropical when it hits Japan; sort of reminds me of TS Beryl and Hurricane Ophelia from 2005:-) Alastor Moody (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if this will make landfall. It looks like it's going to move out to sea just beyond the coast. Either way it's a very weak storm now, and I'd be surprised if it did much damage. bob rulz 04:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actual, it will not make landfall (i bet Japan is in luck) and simply become extratropical which it is already doing. Alastor Moody (talk) 18:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The JMA now calls it as a minimal tropical storm, so I expect it to be declared as an extratropical depression by the next advisory issue (if they ever give one, but seems unlikely). Alastor Moody (talk) 03:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Well it seems to have come back, but Maria is sure clinging onto that minimal tropical storm status. And also, I think it may have been already extrtropical. It hardly has any warm core. Alastor Moody (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the cyclone phase diagrams say it's still warm-core, so I guess the JMA is right on by continuing advisories. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 01:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually its now an extratropical low, as the JMA has quit issuing advisories. Alastor Moody (talk) 06:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 09W.MARIA

message: JMA has it as a TD now. Looks very impressive on satellite. Chacor 10:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TROPICAL DEPRESSION

message: Pagasa has named this stotm "Inday" -- VOFFA 18:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed the section for consistency's sake. Definitely looking good, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a TCFA issued on this later today. JTWC calls it a fair area right now. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since Inday is currently at 30 kt (by the JMA advisories), I wouldn't be ever astonished that this storm to be monitered as a tropical storm by tommorow. And if anyone thinks I'm wrong, please go visit the Navy page, or the JMA page. Alastor Moody (talk) 05:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 91W."INDAY"

message: The JTWC has issued 91W. "Inday" as 10W.NONAME. Alastor Moody (talk) 07:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it hasn't. The NRL isn't the JTWC. The JTWC will issue a warning on Tropical Depression 10W when it does. I have, by the way, reverted the edit to the main article, it shouldn't go there until the JTWC confirms it. Chacor 07:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 10W.NONAME

message: 92W just appeared. -- RattleMan 22:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks sort-of disorganized here, I wonder if thia blob may ever develope. Alastor Moody (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The satellite presentation has improved markedly and it's been given a fair chance of development. Who does the official predictions for that? The JTWC or the JMA? I saw the notice on the Storm2k board, but it doesn't say which agency it comes from. bob rulz 08:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the JTWC. The JMA only classes TDs, and doesnt actually talk about chances (except in prognostic reasoning, which I've heard they do release occasionally). Chacor 14:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was the JTWC...I just wasn't sure. This invest is looking better every time I take a look at the NRL page. bob rulz 15:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess its developing right now. Alastor Moody (talk) 22:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks amazing in satellite images. If this thing managed to grow into a very strong typhoon, i hope it will not got to China. --Irfanfaiz 12:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 92W.INVEST

message: Now 11W from NRL. JMA has it as a TD. Chacor 13:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks very organized, wind shear dosen't seem to bother this depression, but it seems to be heading where Maria once was; Japan and the RSMC Tokyo. Alastor Moody (talk) 21:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard somewhere that Maria was orignally sub tropical. Thank god this was not on a path towards China. --Irfanfaiz 22:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if Maria started as an subtropical cyclone, it later became tropical before becoming an ex-tropical low. Alastor Moody (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 11W.NONAME (JMA TD)

message: 93W just appeared as well. -- RattleMan 22:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of all three new invests, this one looks the best. I wouldn't be surprised if this one developed first. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's gone though. bob rulz 18:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 93W.INVEST

message: 94 is up as well--24.83.98.3 23:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is another rather impressive looking invest. bob rulz 15:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. Chacor (formerly NSLE) 16:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 94W.INVEST

message: Near the Philippines. PAGASA hasn't named it yet. Chacor (formerly NSLE) 16:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PAGASA dosen't name invests btw. Irfanfaiz 22:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm, no. PAGASA does name INVESTS. Agaton was an invest (98W IIRC). Its just that to them it was a TD...--Nilfanion (talk) 23:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean "Not all"?. --Irfanfaiz 12:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PAGASA names INVESTS which they feel are TDs, this year that's been 98W (Agaton), 92W (Domeng - Jelawat), 91W (Inday - Bopha). Chacor 13:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 95W.INVEST

message: =====96W.INVEST=====
There's a 96W on NRL. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And actually, this appears to be the same area as 95W. Did it split into two disturbances, or is this an error? --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: TCFA. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 19:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's official now (if you call the JTWC official). íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 22:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's officially a TD. JMA has it as a TD on their weather map, and is forecasting it to become a TS within 24 hours. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Katring from PAGASA at 2 a.m. local time Aug 14 (1800 UTC). Chacor 00:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Sonamu must have reached its peak intensity already, the JMA forecastsd it to dissipate within 2 days, so does the JTWC. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's getting torn apart by Wukong. —Cuiviénen 01:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the JMA monitors it as a weak tropical storm while Wukong is a strong(er) tropical storm so I expect Sonamu to be absorbed or become ex-tropical depression. Not only that, some dry air is in northeast of Sonamu and convection is decreasiong slowly. But I also note an eye or a central point of the storm is forming. Alastor Moody (talk) 01:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, looks like Wukong's going to absorb the smaller Sonamu... Typhoonchaser 01:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's funny, maybe Sonamu has an eye. But its beginning to weaken and the most wirdest part is that convection is only in the southwest of the storm. What happen to the rest, got absorbed by Wukong or something? Alastor Moody (talk) 01:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting to note that the strongest rainbands are displaced to its southwest. There's a clear eye on the visible satellite images, but the rainbands there are weak... Typhoonchaser 01:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The JMA says this storm will be dead within 2 days or 48 hours. Alastor Moody (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, it looks like Sonamu has joined the same system with Wukong, if you look at the NRL water vapor image for Sonamu. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Sonamu is now being absorbed by Wukong, so I expect Wukong to be at least a STS or possibly even a typhoon. The JMA even expects this to be absorbed while the JTWC forecasts it to slam into Wukong. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sonamu is now being absorbed by Wukong" - YANAM. You are not a meteorologist. Says who that Sonamu is being absorbed? Good grief. Chacor 02:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: EVERYONE IS SAYING SONAMU IS BEING ABSORBED BY WUKONG, NOT ONLY ME!!! And also don't start this again, you've been driving me crazy for you thinking me as a meteorologist, so what if I can't talk like a meteorologist?!?! And what do you mean "YANAM" is that a cuss word or something? Alastor Moody (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is "everyone"? Not the JMA. You Are Not A Meteorologist is what "YANAM" means. Chacor 02:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care! LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!! Alastor Moody (talk) 02:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CIV, WP:NOT. Read those two Wiki policies, for you are close to a request for comment on user conduct. I know at least three people who'll support. Chacor 02:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stay out of thiat, actually you are making me mad. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, calm down. I recommend that this section be archived so we can start over. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I am wholly serious. Your attitude has been near disruptive, and does not help the project nor the encyclopedia. You need to get it in check, or we'll need the Wiki community to agree on it. Also, support archiving. Chacor 02:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, sorry; but I'm gonna retreat to my userpage. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Archived stuff. Start over, please, and no incivility. Cheers, Chacor 03:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: From what I can observe, it seems that Sonamu's circulation is starting to be incorporated into Wukong's circulation. Last year's Vicente and 90W is a good example: 90W was sheared into a weird squarish shape like Sonamu's now, and it was only a matter of time before Vicente incorporated 90W into its circulation. This looks similar. Typhoonchaser 03:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's being eaten up, it's getting longer and longer by the hour, from CWB images... its convection will be completely absorbed into Wukong's rainbands... Let's see if Wukong will strengthen then... (pity no one's up to watch this uncommon phenomenon...) Typhoonchaser 08:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's very interesting, watching this get swallowed by Wukong. It's essentially dead now. bob rulz 19:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The NRL has it as a 30 kt (35 mph) tropical depression, but the JTWC has it as a 35 kt (40 mph) storm. How can that be? Alastor Moody (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wukong has now sheared Sonamu so I guess Sonamu is Wukong now, if you see the NRL water vapor image for Sonamu, he seems to be completely mixed up in th big ape's convection. Alastor Moody (talk) 21:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like a band of clouds (looks like Wukong is eating it for breakfast). --Irfanfaiz 22:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now completely, and officially gone, the big ol' monkey must have finished its last bite. Alastor Moody (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 12W.SONAMU

message: There's a 96W on NRL. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:06, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And actually, this appears to be the same area as 95W. Did it split into two disturbances, or is this an error? --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: TCFA. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 19:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 96W.INVEST

message: The NRL has it as a NONAME. Alastor Moody (talk) 20:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's official now (if you call the JTWC official). íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 22:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's officially a TD. JMA has it as a TD on their weather map, and is forecasting it to become a TS within 24 hours. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Katring from PAGASA at 2 a.m. local time Aug 14 (1800 UTC). Chacor 00:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 12W.NONAME

message: The Japan Meteorological Agency names it a tropical storm -- VOFFA 02:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sonamu must have reached its peak intensity already, the JMA forecastsd it to dissipate within 2 days, so does the JTWC. Alastor Moody (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's getting torn apart by Wukong. —Cuiviénen 01:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the JMA monitors it as a weak tropical storm while Wukong is a strong(er) tropical storm so I expect Sonamu to be absorbed or become ex-tropical depression. Not only that, some dry air is in northeast of Sonamu and convection is decreasiong slowly. But I also note an eye or a central point of the storm is forming. Alastor Moody (talk) 01:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, looks like Wukong's going to absorb the smaller Sonamu... Typhoonchaser 01:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's funny, maybe Sonamu has an eye. But its beginning to weaken and the most wirdest part is that convection is only in the southwest of the storm. What happen to the rest, got absorbed by Wukong or something? Alastor Moody (talk) 01:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting to note that the strongest rainbands are displaced to its southwest. There's a clear eye on the visible satellite images, but the rainbands there are weak... Typhoonchaser 01:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The JMA says this storm will be dead within 2 days or 48 hours. Alastor Moody (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, it looks like Sonamu has joined the same system with Wukong, if you look at the NRL water vapor image for Sonamu. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: TS0611 SONAMU

message: Making a new section that should have been made a few hours ago. The center is almost completely exposed, so it looks like Sonamu will either be absorbed or sheared to death by Wukong. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sonamu is now being absorbed by Wukong, so I expect Wukong to be at least a STS or possibly even a typhoon. The JMA even expects this to be absorbed while the JTWC forecasts it to slam into Wukong. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Sonamu is now being absorbed by Wukong" - YANAM. You are not a meteorologist. Says who that Sonamu is being absorbed? Good grief. Chacor 02:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: EVERYONE IS SAYING SONAMU IS BEING ABSORBED BY WUKONG, NOT ONLY ME!!! And also don't start this again, you've been driving me crazy for you thinking me as a meteorologist, so what if I can't talk like a meteorologist?!?! And what do you mean "YANAM" is that a cuss word or something? Alastor Moody (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is "everyone"? Not the JMA. You Are Not A Meteorologist is what "YANAM" means. Chacor 02:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care! LEAVE ME ALONE!!!!! Alastor Moody (talk) 02:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CIV, WP:NOT. Read those two Wiki policies, for you are close to a request for comment on user conduct. I know at least three people who'll support. Chacor 02:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stay out of thiat, actually you are making me mad. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, calm down. I recommend that this section be archived so we can start over. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 02:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I am wholly serious. Your attitude has been near disruptive, and does not help the project nor the encyclopedia. You need to get it in check, or we'll need the Wiki community to agree on it. Also, support archiving. Chacor 02:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, sorry; but I'm gonna retreat to my userpage. Alastor Moody (talk) 02:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 12W.SONAMU

message: :Archived stuff. Start over, please, and no incivility. Cheers, Chacor 03:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I can observe, it seems that Sonamu's circulation is starting to be incorporated into Wukong's circulation. Last year's Vicente and 90W is a good example: 90W was sheared into a weird squarish shape like Sonamu's now, and it was only a matter of time before Vicente incorporated 90W into its circulation. This looks similar. Typhoonchaser 03:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's being eaten up, it's getting longer and longer by the hour, from CWB images... its convection will be completely absorbed into Wukong's rainbands... Let's see if Wukong will strengthen then... (pity no one's up to watch this uncommon phenomenon...) Typhoonchaser 08:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's very interesting, watching this get swallowed by Wukong. It's essentially dead now. bob rulz 19:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The NRL has it as a 30 kt (35 mph) tropical depression, but the JTWC has it as a 35 kt (40 mph) storm. How can that be? Alastor Moody (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wukong has now sheared Sonamu so I guess Sonamu is Wukong now, if you see the NRL water vapor image for Sonamu, he seems to be completely mixed up in th big ape's convection. Alastor Moody (talk) 21:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like a band of clouds (looks like Wukong is eating it for breakfast). --Irfanfaiz 22:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now completely, and officially gone, the big ol' monkey must have finished its last bite. Alastor Moody (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 12W.SONAMU (2)

message: 98W just appeared. Did we miss 97W? -- RattleMan 01:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They must be losing it over there at NRL, what with all these WPAC systems to track. ;) They changed 95W to 96W for no apparent reason. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 01:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The SSD reported a Dvorak reading of ST1.5/1.5 (subtropical!) for a 97W not too long ago, but it isn't on NRL. Chacor 03:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I dosen't look healthy. I think this blob is causing the cloudiness at my place. --Irfanfaiz 05:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Back on. 24.83.98.3 20:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  NRL has re-issued 98W.INVEST but it's located just north of the equator.-- VOFFA 20:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  About 10 times the distance from Hong Kong than it was back there in the South China Sea ;) Seriously though, I've never seen NRL re-issue. Maybe I haven't been checking often enough... Typhoonchaser 11:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Gone for the second time, ;) -- グリフオーザー 06:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 98W.INVEST

message: The 97W mentioned above had just appeared on NRL. -- RattleMan 11:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoa, just inside the date line... middle of nowhere, really... Typhoonchaser 13:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's subtropical, says the SSD. Unfortunately, NRL does not release information on movement of storms. JTWC doesn't mention anything, while the CPHC isn't mentioning it... YET. If it stays an invest and moves east we'll definitely (this is definite, like earlier in the season with 95E (I think) and 90C) get 91C. Looks quite interesting. Chacor 14:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it should be 92C, cuz 97E is in the Central Pacific. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my post at the EPac talk - it isn't. Chacor 14:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you go to the CPHC website, you can see this system just coming into satellite range. It appears to be nearly stationary. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Wind shear is slowing down developement, but I don't know why people call it sub-tropical, it looks do disorganized that I can't tell. Alastor Moody (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it is gonna detach from a cold front? --Irfanfaiz 05:29, 15 August 2006 
Was moving westwards earlier, but now it's drifting east. SSD's latest readings are still ST1.5/1.5... currently just under six degrees longitude west of the date line. Chacor 06:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The Japan Meteorological Agency notes it as a Tropical Depression with 1012 hPa.  However in the 12 hour outlook of the chart it returns back to an area of low pressure. -- VOFFA 19:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From that location, it could follow a similar track to Paka or Oliwa? --Irfanfaiz 22:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Where does it say it's a depression? Can't find it on the JMA. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 22:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It shows it here. Currently it says "TROPICAL DEPRESSION 1010 HPA AT 30N 173E WEST SLOWLY." -- 22:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm guessing it's a bug. Typhoonchaser 02:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More than likely a typo. I'm sure they meant 2.0. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 03:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Gone -- グリフオーザー 06:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 97W.INVEST

message: 91W just appeared. Did we miss 90W? -- RattleMan 00:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The NRL is making up for the double 98W.INVEST =}  nah don't think there was a 90W.INVEST issued. -- VOFFA 00:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NRL had a minor problem with 91W for a short while:   -- RattleMan 06:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't looks very healthy. Unless it's that swirl down near the southeast corner of the image, there's hardly anything out there at all. bob rulz 07:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Inactive now -- グリフオーザー 21:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 91W.INVEST

message: 92W also appeared. -- RattleMan 00:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not appearing on NRL anymore, still on FNMOC page though.. -- グリフオーザー 06:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 92W.INVEST

message: Active day, this... Chacor 02:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: hmm looks like the remains of 99W.INVEST, by chance. -- VOFFA 04:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Also gone -- グリフオーザー 21:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 93W.INVEST

message: New invest at 8.2N 174E. -- RattleMan 01:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's never a good area to see potential tropical cyclone development. Way out near the Marshall Islands often produces significant typhoons. bob rulz 07:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Joint Typhoon Warning Center doesn't mention this invest.. but the one near Naha, Okinawa is...  -- グリフオーザー 15:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: JTWC now mentions this invest and gives it a fair chance of it becoming a significate cyclone. -- グリフオーザー 21:37, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And gone. bob rulz 14:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 94W.INVEST

message: They just keep coming! This one's at 17N 135.5E. -- RattleMan 22:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it. bob rulz 04:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, weird. I see it now, but it's the same one I saw on 95W before and now I don't see one on 95W. The West Pacific still confuses me. bob rulz 04:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I see it now; it looks like they put the 95W one on the wrong INVEST. It looks like this one has a TCFA and 95W doesn't. bob rulz 08:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think they are TCFA's... no TCFA alert, no time of issue, etc etc. JTWC grades 94W as a POOR, but 96W has registered nothing on JTWC. Typhoonchaser 14:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 96W.INVEST

message: =====97W.INVEST=====
Here's another one. bob rulz 22:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1004 hPa low near 19N 108E, almost stationary according to JMA. -- グリフオーザー 22:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Wow, that organized fast. Just 12 hours ago it looked like a disorganized scattering of clouds, now it almost looks like a tropical depression. bob rulz 04:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The HKO upgraded it into a TD. Let's see how this storm organises and develops... Typhoonchaser 12:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JMA also shows a TD on the weather chart, and the JTWC has re-issued the TCFA. -- グリフオーザー 00:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now Noname on NRL. 24.83.98.3 19:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

text: JMA only called it a 25-kt TD. Note that the other storms section says JMA-recognised TDs are listed. – Chacor 13:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 13:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 13W.NONAME

message: Here's another one. bob rulz 22:15, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1004 hPa low near 19N 108E, almost stationary according to JMA. -- グリフオーザー 22:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Wow, that organized fast. Just 12 hours ago it looked like a disorganized scattering of clouds, now it almost looks like a tropical depression. bob rulz 04:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The HKO upgraded it into a TD. Let's see how this storm organises and develops... Typhoonchaser 12:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JMA also shows a TD on the weather chart, and the JTWC has re-issued the TCFA. -- グリフオーザー 00:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 97W.INVEST

message: ::::Now Noname on NRL. 24.83.98.3 19:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JMA only called it a 25-kt TD. Note that the other storms section says JMA-recognised TDs are listed. – Chacor 13:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 13:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 13W.NONAME

message: New invest at 13.2N 122.3E. -- RattleMan 23:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: not on NRL listing anymore. -- グリフオーザー 02:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Back on... Let's see if this one can develop or not. Typhoonchaser 03:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 98W.INVEST

message: Here's another invest at 15N 156E. -- RattleMan 04:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 99W.INVEST

message: ====01C.IOKE====
In view of Ioke's upcoming crossover, this section has been started. To make reading easier please continue all comments at Talk:2006 Pacific hurricane season and not continue from here.
====90W.INVEST====
Here's a new one at 15.2N 113.1E. -- RattleMan 11:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: appears it has dissipated. -- グリフオーザー 14:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Week 5

message: Here's a new one at 15.2N 113.1E. -- RattleMan 11:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 90W.INVEST

message: 18.5ºN 151.5ºE, looks like nothing at the moment but there is a storm cell to the northeast. -- 06:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: appears it has dissipated. -- グリフオーザー 14:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 91W.INVEST