lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Sweet Hereafter (novel)

message: This post seems to conclude that she lied as a means of revenge against her father for having a incestious relationship with her.  However, I don't agree.  As wrong as it might be, Nicole was a willing participent in that relationship, and never appeared victimized by it.  What did change though, was the way her father treated her after the accident.  She makes the comment that she's a wheel chair girl now, and not the up and coming pretty musician they both thought she'd be.  I think she was hurt more by the loss of her relationship with her father, and i'm not talking the sexual relationhip, but as friends and partners in her potential music career.  Along with the use of her legs she lost a friend and a lover.
As for why she lied, i think it could be partly be due to the hurt of losing her relationship with her father.  However, it was clear that her father wanted to profit from her injury... i think she recognized that and the fact that the town was being torn apart by this lawyer and the lawsuit... and in a moment of clarity she realized this and put an end to it.
The fact that all these things are open to interpretation is what made me love the movie.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
WHY SHE LIED 2
Im not sure what the movie said, I did not watch it, but in the book she most certainly was not a willing participant in the relationship. She often times stated how places alone with her father were unsafe places. At one point after the accident when she gained control over her father by holding the secret over him, after she lied about Dolores, she looked at her father and realized hed never smile again and she was happy. I think in a way the accident freed her. It made it so her father didnt abuse her anymore, and they could be a family. 
I believe she lied, not only to get back at her father, but also for many other reasons. Some were selfish, so she could have control and get away with it, some were moral, she realized it was wrong to place blame and no one wanted what happened to happen, and some were model, with Billy comming by, a person she looked up to so much, stating how wrong he thought the lawsuits were and how much they hurt him. However, getting back at her father most certainly was a reason among many, and she morned the loss of her family and father, but not the loss of a friend and a lover, that is just rediculous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restlessroots (talk • contribs) 01:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why she lied
Talk:LGBT rights in Singapore

message: Singapore legalized homosexuality https://www.npr.org/2022/08/21/1118681206/singapore-lgbtq-rights-law 24.189.64.239 (talk) 07:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – robertsky (talk) 08:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 October 2022 

message: Coming into affect in 2023 (see Equaldex), Singapore will repeal Section 377A, meaning male homosexuality will be officially legal in Singapore. So, I would like to replace the "Illegal for men" part with "Legal since 2023" or something on the lines of that. Singapore's PM, Lee Hsien Loong, announced the change last month. Sources:
* https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-62545577.amp
* https://amp.abc.net.au/article/101360236
Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 13:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Thiscouldbeauser We wait till the new law is in effect. WP:CRSYTAL – robertsky (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Robertsky could we at least add something like "will be legalised in 2023" or whatever at least somewhere here? Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Thiscouldbeauser It is already in the article that there will be changes to the law. As for the dates/years, let's hold it off putting our/your timeline to it since there is no sources indicating when the law will pass. We don't report or speculate on Wikipedia. – robertsky (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeal 

message: The partial repeal in 2007 dealt with oral sex, not sex between women. Read the law itself. They are very much not the same thing and are not to be misinterpreted. There is no actual evidence that specifically states that same-sex activity between women only became legal in 2007. There was never such a law as sex between women wasn't as frown upon as compared to sex between men when the law was legislated in the 1930s. Pauline Muley (talk) 11:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same-sex activity between women was never illegal 

message: Old: The parliamentary debates and the prime minister's statement played a role in the 2022 ruling of the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court that the law was unenforeable.
New: The parliamentary debates and the prime minister's statement played a role in the 2022 ruling of the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court that the law was *unenforceable*.
Can someone with edit privileges fix this typo?
^^^ Come here to say the same thing. "unenforeable" should be "unenforceable".
:: Thanks for pointing it out. Kleuske (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo cleanup
Talk:Bourke Place

message: In says in the article that Bourke Place is the third largest building in Melbourne. There is also a link provided to this page which states it to be the fourth largest. Which is correct? 121.223.164.28 (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Third tallest building in Melbourne
Talk:Forest Park Cemetery (Brunswick, New York)

message: The Life Magazine article mentioned on the Main Page for Forest Park Cemetary ("Top Ten Haunted Places") has been investigated by many, but this article has never been found.  It is commonly accepted that this article is an unsubstantiated rumor and does not exist.   Aishidao (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Life Magazine article
Talk:Dennis E. Eckart

message: Should be merged -- they are the same person!!
JamesGregory 03:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mountain Top, Pennsylvania

message: The United States Postal Service uses the spelling Mountain Top for ZIP Code 18707. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mountaintop vs. Mountain Top

message: I edited part of the section regarding "Mountain Top" vs. "Mountaintop" because it was partly superfluous (the part about metaplasmus) and partly unsupported ("it's a well known fact that...").  It was also teetering on the brink of NPOV.  The remaining text is enough to support the point.  As there is some genuine debate on the issue (though I think it's clear that the correct name is "Mountain Top"), I also altered the opening line slightly.  Brad E. Williams 00:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for edit 

message: I'd like to see some addition to events taking place within the community (other than weather news) such as the annual picnics and fireworks displays etc. --Neoursa (talk) 10:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community and Events
Talk:Jimmy Waite

message: I removed the stats section, as it appeared to be a straight copy paste from the old version of hockeydb (which was added as a reference during the same edit that added stats).  If someone wants to reproduce the table, I think that should be fine, but copying and pasting the table with the formating that could be copyrighted to hockeydb might violate copyright.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.GnoworTalk2Medid wha? 21:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats
Talk:Two-legged tie

message: When was the first two-legged tie? In the Stanley Cup? –HTD 15:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: It looks like the paragraph in this section on second-leg advantage was a mish-mash of stuff.  I read it several times without it making sense, so it needs a rewrite.  I've removed it and will re-source it from scratch.  For example, the away team absolutely does not need to score twice in the second leg, because they have the 2-1 GF advantage in that leg as far as the aggregate goes.  It's the second leg home team that has to maintain the GD. MSJapan (talk) 22:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second leg home advantage section
Talk:Spencer Street

message: spencer st power station was built ( the original) in 1892, not 1930.
: Fixed Wongm 12:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Sydney Road

message: Dead links to repair or remove include:
# Sydney Road boulevard of dreams, The Age, 6/1/07
 --wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 10:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: The paragraph on the section from Park St to Bell St is all positives about the businesses and buildings there. It has no references, although it's reasonably accurate. What's missing, however, is the fact, known to anyone who has ever tried to drive there, that it's an absolute disaster for traffic. This is due to the fact that it's a narrow road, with car parking for the strip shopping centre, and double tram lines. This is one of those such well known facts locally that I can't imagine anyone bothering to write about it to create an appropriate reference.
I don't like to add further unreferenced material, but the current unreferenced material is very one sided. But to delete it all  because it's unreferenced would damage the article considerably.
Does anyone have any suggestions? HiLo48 (talk) 10:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-NPOV on Park St to Bell St 

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Swanston Street

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 
Template talk:Bishopric

message: Greetings - I timidly closed the <noinclude> tag and it seems to have cleared up one layout problem, but it doesn't look as if this template is working. Just a heads-up in case anyone is keeping an eye on it. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 03:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Please replace :Image:Holysee-arms.png with :Image:Holysee-arms.svg in this template (I can't seem to find how to do it myself). Thanks in advance. It Is Me Here (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please replace a PNG with an SVG
Talk:King Street, Melbourne

message: "titty bars"??  Also, should there be mention of the fact that it's generally regarded as being where much of the city violence occurs?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.58.120.11 (talk) 01:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:La Trobe Street

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The photo could use updating! --Rylie James Thomas (talk) 06:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Lonsdale Street

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 
Talk:William Street, Melbourne

message: After which William is William St named? 101.172.85.62 (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  which William? 

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 09:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Maling Road

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Flemington Road

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Unconscionability

message: Typically, such a contract is held to be unenforceable because the consideration offered is lacking or is so obviously inadequate that to enforce the contract would be unfair to the party seeking to escape the contract.
I think this sentence is incorrect.  Unconscionability is a doctrine reserved for contracts (or contract provisions) that are outrageously unfair.  Courts use it as a last resort.  In cases in which there is a lack of consideration, courts needn't invoke unconscionabilty; courts need only invoke lack of consideration.--RMKeaton 03:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Isn't this case a claim about undue influence - Bundy claimed the manager unduly influenced his decision - rather than Unconscionable bargain? Lisiate 23:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lloyds Bank v Bundy

message: I just added a small section on R2d 208.  I don't have time to do more now, but I think that's really what we want, rather than the discussion of mistake.
Motorneuron (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restatement 205-208

message: Looks like it was written by someone who is CLEARLY not a lawyer.  As noted, such a contract would be unenforceable in the face of those statutes, but NOT on grounds of unconscionability.  Rather, the clause would be void for illegality or in violation of public policy.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted the garbage by 70.178.75.61.  Amazing it was in here so long---no one is watching the article. --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement about unconscionability arising from statute is just plain wrong 

message: I am under the impression that it is bad form to put "citation needed" in the introduction of an article. The statements in the introduction are supposed to be supported by citations in the main body. On a related note, is there a tag for statements in an introduction that are not supported in the body text? MathEconMajor (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Needed

message: The last paragraph say Australian legal scholars suggest "unconscionability" should be renamed to "dog act". It uses the Western Australian legislation, Dog Act 1976, as an example - but that legislation is just about dog ownership. It also references the court case, Carr v R [2009] NSWSC 995 as another example, although in that case the reference to "dog act" is just a quote from the offender and not a legal term. AronSimpson (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Last paragraph in Australian Case Law cites irrelevant sources
Talk:Royal Melbourne Hospital

message: This figure is uncited. 
After doing some further research, the figure comes up at 571 beds. 
2 900 beds would make it larger than the largest hospital in the United States, and over three times the size of John Hopkins. 
This is patently sloppy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.88.16 (talk) 00:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 900 Beds???? 
Talk:ACDC Lane

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:19, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: *"ACDC Lane (off Finder's Lane, a block and half from Swanston) celebrates the heavy metal rock group AC/DC." Night + Day San Francisco
*"In the heart of Melbourne's financial district, Corporation Lane was renamed ACDC Lane." AC/DC's Highway to Hell
*"ACDC Lane...there's nothing to see." Frommer's Melbourne Free and Dirt Cheap
*Here is a picture of a street sign, confirming that the name is in fact "ACDC Lane". Kauffner (talk) 13:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage examples
Talk:Bourke Street

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 

message: " The Melbourne mall remains the only such mall to allow vehicles."
What is this supposed to mean ?   There are dozens of similar "malls" around the world,  where sections of streets have been closed to cars,  but have trams and pedestrians.Lathamibird (talk) 04:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange claim
Talk:Exhibition Street

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 
Talk:Elizabeth Street, Melbourne

message: Does anyone have a citation for the explanation that Elizabeth Street is named after the wife of Governor Bourke?
There are four parallel streets in the Hoddle Grid named, in order: King, William, Queen, Elizabeth.  The naming was clearly intended to be understood as a reference to King William and Queen Elizabeth.  It may also have been a piece of vanity on Bourke's part, but it's pretty obvious (to me, at least), whom you're supposed to think it's named after.  -- De Guerre (talk) 23:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Haile Gerima

message: I would like to invite my fellow Ethiopians as well as those who would like to contribute and edit this page and enrich it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amifiker (talk • contribs) 16:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  please try to enrich this page ..... 

message: We gotta keep it more neutral and wikipedia-ish.  Brilliant artist though, I still need to get a copy of Sankofa.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjoyner (talk • contribs) 00:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good info but...

message: Was the new text just added copied from somewhere? If so, that's not acceptable; we must always write our articles "from scratch" at Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New text
Talk:Ballad of a Thin Man

message: Years ago, I discovered a left oriented news weekly called The Masses in a college library.  It had a large socialist/communist following and was an early social justice medium published from about 1915-1925.  In perhaps a 1918 edition I found a political cartoon depicting a suited, fat industrialist in his office looking out a large window at a scene of environmental devastation of polluting smoke stacks and ugliness.  The caption was "And you don't know what is happening do you Mr. Jones."  Can not be a coincidence.  I'm sure either Dylan saw that cartoon or the phrase goes back even farther and he picked it up there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.214.8 (talk) 03:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "and you don't know what's happening do you Mr. Jones" 

message: Has anyone seen an animal farm connection? the song does seem like its about unexpected change and socialist reform, and the farmer in animal farm was a mr jones. just wondering.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.1.51 (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal Farm connection? 

message: It's worth mentioning that Lennon's "Yer Blues" and Counting Crows' "Mr Jones" both refer to "Ballad of a Thin Man" though not in the same manner.  I disagree that the relation between "Mr Jones" and "Ballad of a Thin Man" is an "unconfirmed rumor".  You don't invoke Dylan's name explicitly in a song called "Mr Jones" without a wink to "Ballad of a Thin Man".  (Is it "unconfirmed" until Adam Duritz comes clean?)  I'm pretty sure there's at least one other song that refers to "Ballad of a Thin Man" and if I remember what it is I'll be back. 65.96.90.194 (talk) 05:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  answer songs 