lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elias Loomis

message: "WHAT LINKS HERE" connects to several other articles in Wikipedia.  He was a famous man.  GhostofSuperslum 14:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous 

message: What is now in the Elias Loomis article is some standard biographical information and references and a large amount on a geomagnetic storm.  The latter information is so great that it overwhelms the article's main subject.  Moreover, this interesting geophysical information is more-or-less buried, for the general reader, within this Wikipedia article on an obscure (in 2008) American astronomer.  Should a new article be started on just the geomagnetic storm itself?  - Astrochemist (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is plenty of discussion on this magnetic storm under "Solar Storm of 1859". Spatial 58.156.153.194 (talk) 23:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:Falling in love

message: I see nothing wrong or unneutral about this page, and have removed your npov. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PrivateRyan (talk • contribs).
: Whether or not it's npov I think the page is terrible.  It has two sources, they are very old (1956 and 1983), it uses specialized psychobabble rather than plain english, and it does not have any in-line citations.  Come on people!  Much more has been written about falling in love than the extremely narrow perspectives portrayed on this page.  Cazort (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  bah 

message: The artical states that love might not be permenet, but I say the differ. Even if you and the object are seperated, love can be permenet, if the love is strong enough.
--216.194.183.29 17:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falling in love 

message: Is really all we have on the subject?It doesn't tell me anything, except that scientists tried to classify it.It needs to be improved.I'll do it if noone else will. Mr. Greenchat 16:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: The neurostransmitters responsible for falling in love include serotonin and others, if I'm not mistaken. I think they should be included in this article.CalamusFortis 17:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brain Chemistry

message: This is a great start to the article! The diversity of subtopics cover all aspects of the main topic and more. Also, all sources are relevant and useful. However, more research can be added to make this article more relevant and informative. 
Katelynn.parker (talk) 00:07, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A great start 

message: Although the body of the article isn't about anything else, the lede fails to make clear that we're talking about the sex-based love here, not storge, agape, nor philia. Lycurgus (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Eros 

message: I plan to record a spoken version of the article soon.  Any feedback is welcomed. 0101Abc (talk) 01:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoken Article
Talk:Thomas DeLio

message: Is there any way to fix the title of this entry?  It should read DeLio, not delio.  Also, some listed contributors to Tom Licata's book on DeLio have "professor" listed and some do not.  I'm happy to edit that but I suppose I'm wondering why that is?  71.87.61.254 14:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kallakurichi

message: *state bank of india,gandi road
*state bank of india,kachirapalayam road
*karur vyasa,katcheri road
*lakshmi vilas,kachirapalayam road 
*Axis bank,chennai main road                       *Indian bank,katcheri road                            *central bank of india,katcheri road              *indian overseas bank,katcheri road            *city union bank,salem main road                 *canara bank at A.k.t school                           *karur vyasa at a.k.t school  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthikeyanbalaraman (talk • contribs) 09:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ATM 

message: Ezhilarasan born at Sankarapuram, He is a Well Social enableralso strive continuously about KALLAKURICHI as a new District issue 
Ezhil01298 (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ezhilarasan Sankarapuram  

message: Ezhilarasan Sankarapuram HOME is nearly to Sankarapuram Post office Ezhil01298 (talk) 16:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ezhilarasan Home
Talk:Cathedral of Mary Our Queen, Baltimore

message: First, some Cathedrals are very basic.  They do not have to be grand buildings.  They only must have the bishop's seat.  
Second, given the high number of Catholic monarchs that have lived in the last 2,000 years, can we be certain that none of these kings or queens have donated a cathedral somewhere in the world?  
And none of this factors in non-Catholic cathedrals.
If we are to include this claim in the article, then we must make it clear that it is a quotation from an individual and not a statement of fact. Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 08:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Cathedral donated by a single individual
Talk:Participatory ergonomics

message: How to move the menu below the introduction? I'm reading through the style guide and haven't found it yet. If anyone can help please show me how. -Tanya
:Fixed. --Ronz 22:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menu 

message: This article has a references overkill, which is not acceptable. I gives the impression that this is a highly original work, which has not president. See further WP:NOR. -- Mdd (talk) 11:15, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References overkill
Talk:The Career of Nicodemus Dyzma

message: @ => "In June 1982, a Village Voice article by Geoffrey Stokes and Eliot Fremont-Smith accused Kosiński of plagiarizing Dołęga-Mostowicz..." 
The article in question (accessible here: https://www.villagevoice.com/2020/05/28/jerzy-kosinskis-tainted-words/) doesn't even mention Dołęga-Mostowicz.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.205.237.88 (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Category talk:Free HTML editors

message: I would like to propse that the items on this page be split into two groups:
 - standalone HTML IDEs (like NVU)
 - WYSIWYG textbox inline editors (like FCKedit)
They really serve two completely different purposes.
:How do you propose to split the page?  You've described the policy part of the decision, but when you edit the Wikipedia Category page, what tags will let you split the contents of the category? Gronky 14:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the split would make sense. I have no idea how wikipedia works though, so if someone else could do it, would be appreciated. -asgw 10:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split the page?

message: 2 WYSIWYG Browser-based, open source html/xhtml editors.
http://xheditor.com/  Open Source, devs at http://code.google.com/p/xheditor/
http://www.kindsoft.net/  KindEditor,LGPL, is used by Many Chinese Websites http://code.google.com/p/kindeditor/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.43.246 (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: TobeAdded
Talk:This Kiss (Faith Hill song)

message: In 2000, the italian singer Paola Turci recorded a cover of This Kiss, called Questione di sguardi, which reached the #54 in the italian chart. --87.16.191.21 (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian Cover
Talk:State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.

message: I've removed the following paragraph as I really don't see how to rewrite it in an NPOV way:
:It may be worth noting that patents have struggled with every new class of technology.  However, by definition, each and every patent covers something that has never been covered by a patent before.  The patent system is designed to adapt to new types of technology as they arise.  In this vein, the Federal Circuit appears to be very cautious in carving out new categories of excluded technology.
If we want to cover this, we could try to find some law review articles on the subject or some such, although it belongs in Business method patent as much as here, perhaps. Kingdon 23:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically it is a fact that the Federal Circuit always adopted the view that there is no room for other judicially-created exclusions except the three age-old exceptions: abstract ideas, natural phenomena and laws of nature. Documentation: Diamond v. Chakrabarty decision. Rbakels (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Paragraph removed

message: Signature was the assignee of the '056 patent, so it was not "granted" to Signature as the article says in the overview. Rather it was granted to R. Todd Boes, the inventor, on 9 March 1993, and Signature was the named assignee on the issued '056 patent. State Street, 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998). Minor aspect, but this important to recognize.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeWitt (talk • contribs) 22:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assignment of Patent Issue

message: A clear majority of the Supreme Court (the Stevens four plus Scalia joining with Breyer's concurrence) rejected the useful, concrete, tangible result test, saying in effect that it set the bar too low.  121a0012 (talk) 02:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The text should only refer to In re Bilski and Bilski v. Kappos and not discuss these decisions in any level of detail, especially now that the Supreme Court has spoken. Rbakels (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: State Street no longer good law

message: There are a lot of webpages about a "State Street v. Signature" case, using the citation:
* (149 F.3d 1368, 1374 n. 6 (Fed. Cir.) 1999)
Is that a second way to cite this case?  (Maybe it's when the decision was published in the Federal Register?)
Or was there a second case with these two companies?  (Retrial?) Gronky (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998 or 1999?  Or were there two cases?
Talk:Kestel (archaeological site)

message: Im letzten Satz beschreibt der Verfasser das Ende des Zinn- Abbaus mit "3000 BC". Es müßte wohl heißen ca. 3000 Jahre vor unserer Zeit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.146.215.89 (talk) 09:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the evidence suggests that the mine was worked throughout the 3rd millennium BC. -- Elphion (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kestel
File talk:Indiana Jones and the Cross of Coronado.jpg

message: The subject is dead, and its a picture from a movie. It quite simply cannot be replaced with a free image. EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacability disputed 

message: We would like to use this picture in the Hungarian version of the Scouting article. How would it be possible? (These copyright laws are a bit difficult for me...:S ) Thanks! --Kun25 19:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interwiki?

message: To paraphrase my favorite comedy, I don't think that rule means what you want it to mean.
a. Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. 
b. Minimal extent of use. An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the Image: namespace. 
Using this image in no way violates the spirit or even the letter of this. This isn't the "multiple items of non-free content" that a adresses, nor is it the "an entire work used if only a portion will suffice" spoken of in b. I know you don't like non-free content, FPaS, but your crusade against this image really needs to stop. S. Dean Jameson 17:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Non-free content use has to be minimal. Doing the same thing twice is not minimal. That's the rule, period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are misinterpreting NFCC #3, period. The use of "minimal" there has nothing, less than nothing to do with the number of articles in which it's used. Please stop removing the FUR for Scouting. I am readding it, per your complete lack of explanation regarding how it supposedly violates NFCC#3. It patently does not, as I explained above. S. Dean Jameson 00:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the image currently isn't in Scouting, there's no real reason for a fair use rationale.  And since the image, nor anything pertaining to it, is not discussed in that article, there's no reason to have the image there in the first place.  So I removed it. --UsaSatsui (talk) 03:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you serious? Fut Per removed it from that article with an edit summary threatening a block. Removing the FUR based on the rationale that it's not in that article right now, when there's an admin threatening to block anyone who dares place it there is speciaous at best. S. Dean Jameson 03:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has a history, and as far as I can see, that history doesn't discuss Indiana Jones whatsoever.  That is the rationale I'm removing it on. --UsaSatsui (talk) 05:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFCC #3 

message: I've added some text to the Scouting article that I feel makes this image more appropriate and defensible there. As such, I've readded the FUR here, and replaced the image in the article. S. Dean Jameson 17:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status update
Talk:Juan Prim

message: A good start; could probably benefit from some headings - something as simple as separating the introduction from the biography would do wonders, I think, for the overall appearance of the article. LordAmeth 20:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Hi, fellow Wikipedians!
I see Serrano is listed as "Monarch" during Prim's time as Prime Minister, although Serrano was only Regent. Should it be corrected to "Regent", "Head of State", or should I leave it as such? Darth2207Lucas (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no infobox parameter for "Regent", so removed the "Monarch" parameter. Thanks for calling attention attention to this. Carlstak (talk) 22:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serrano
Talk:Renaissance Enterprises

message: I've added the "" template to the article Renaissance Enterprises, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Renaissance Enterprises. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. ccwaters 14:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Renaissance Enterprises]]
Template talk:WPZOO Tasks

message: * Organized the template into two sections: Project-wide tasks and Specific article tasks. --Ars Scriptor  14:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[December 7]], 2006 

message: Started to remove  from most pages, according to WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[November 18]], 2015
Template talk:VH

message: For warning an anonymous vandal:
 ~~~~

 ~~~~
I hope this is useful to more people than just me. I use it all the time. — Chris53516 (Talk) 21:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Example

message: How can we add "subst:" to the Month and Year templates without forcing it to be just this month and year? That is, I want the template to add the current month and year, but to subst: the template when it's found the current month and year, not before. — Chris53516 (Talk) 14:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done it. Right after the opening brackets, put subst:. Note that it will only work if you subst the template, which I assume is what you intend. -Amarkov blahedits 16:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thank you! — Chris53516 (Talk) 16:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
File talk:Field-illustrations-add-magnitude.png

message: How was this figure generated? Is it hand-drawn (and then scanned), or is it computer-made? 
— JBatista 14:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Computer-made Vegard (talk) 18:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

text: See  and  for new diagrams showing direction ("sign") as well. Vegard (talk) 18:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Lewis Spence

message: (about Spencer's theory that Scots came from Africa:) --91.148.159.4 10:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article until sourced 

message: Footnote 4 says: "^ Sarton in Isis 4.2 (October 1921:378-380). This is clearly a reference to Grafton Elliot Smith and not to Lewis Spence"
As the referenced text is referring to a Prof. Smith, not to Lewis Spence himself as erroneously mentioned in the text, I suggest this part of the text should be deleted as it has no relevance whatsoever.2A02:1811:B214:CA00:B839:5FD6:9840:30A6 (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should probably be deleted
Talk:James Churchward

message: The name Mu refers to an ancient land in the Pacific, whereas Atlantis is said to lay in the Atlantic Ocean.
90.185.60.68 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 13:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mu and Atlantis is not the same 

message: 1. James' life between his marriage (1871) and his arrival in the US (1880s) will be based on personal family correspondence.
2. James' life after his arrival in the US (as a salesman, inventor, fisherman, etc.) will be based on materials from the original typewritten version of "My Friend Churchey"by Percy Tate Griffith.
3. James' life after he was awarded an enormous settlement for patent infringement (1914) until he died in 1936 will consist of materials from "My Friend Churchey", personal correspondence, his scrapbooks and other data.
Jchurchward (talk) 21:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be willing to scan the relevant personal correspondence and post it in an accessible area online? If so, they would be reasonably reliable references for the purposes they're used for, and might gives others enough information to expand the article, though formal disinterested references would certainly be better. Until then, this article is unsourced and it's impossible to verify your personal references. In the meantime, I'll get Tuck's encyclopedia from my library. Foxyshadis(talk) 01:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional text to be added 

message: Was he an actual Colonel?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.8.98.118 (talk) 11:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonel???
Talk:Living (novel)

message: "a work of sharp social satire":  Not sure why LIVING is considered satire.  Perhaps the action when the owners are on stage is mildly satirical.  But this is infrequent.  Or perhaps the contributor thinks a novel featuring proletarians as the main characters must perforce be satirical.  Or, maybe the contributor has Green mixed up with his contemporary and acquaintance Evelyn Waugh. Larry Koenigsberg (talk) 03:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satire?
File talk:Weirdalclassic.jpg

message: I think the image should stay, at least until a better fair-use alternative is found. It's featured next to an entire section in the article about Yankovic's look, and certainly helps to visually explain what that was. Twilightsojourn 14:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. -Freyyr890 01:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Crispa–Toyota rivalry

message: Ahh, those were the days!--Jondel 05:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good ol'days

message: Anyone has them? --Howard the Duck 09:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of results 
Talk:Introduction to particles

message: The language used here right now is hardly what I would call "non-technical".  I'm not sure this page should exist, but if it should, it needs to have a completely different vocabulary. --Strait 15:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, have I done something erroneous? If by you mean "...Hardly I would call 'non-technical'." The words used within the article are too intricate for you to understand, then however that was not he purpose of the article. Its purpose was merely to give an introduction to 'particles' as the other articles were turgid and read like an essays. This was to give it a brevity to the particles article. I believe the introduction is vital before a layman divulges into the main-article as he would be confused as to what actually is a particle. Perhaps, we can change the wording withing the introduction to simplify the introduction further. However, I don't necessarily think its necessary as anyone with a grasp of English can understand the current article. Although if by "merging" you mean this in the traditional sense of the word, I do believe that generally would be an exceptional idea rather then deleting the article I have created. I am actually new to Wiki, so please do go easy on my opinions when you respond, thanks. --Logic20 17:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I'd support a merge here, with point particle, but this would also require extensive tidying.  I'm not sure anything particularly new is covered here either, so as far as I can see there's no need for a separate article. Jeodesic 17:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-technical?
Talk:Surf art

message: The tone of this article is much more like an essay than an encyclopedia article.  Not sure what to do, as I really don't know much about this particular genre of art.  I'll try to remove some of the more POV stuff...Dina 15:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a pass at it, but it still reads rather essay-like.  Needs more history of the art form, names of artists, I can check some of the links at the bottom. Dina 15:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Zombie (novel)

message: AS WELL AS THE WHAT??!!?!?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.40.27 (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly disagree with you: the book is really about the narrator's alienation from his father.  HandsomeMrToad (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shropshire County Premier Football League

message: How come there are two different champions shown for each of 2004/05 and 2003/04?  Did one of them win the Premier Div and one Div One?  If so, it needs to be made much clearer ChrisTheDude 15:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Belvidere is I believe a district of Shrewsbury. "Belvidere Shropshire" certainly makes enough hits on Google. - fchd 23:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Eläkeläiset

message: While Eläkeläiset is a humppa-band per se, humppa style of music is represented rather differently in Finland, where there are hard-touring dance-bands that compared to Eläkeläiseti are much more polished and suited for formal dancing occasions. Whereas Eläkeläiset by style is much more rockish, which is seen in their shows and fanbase. This is so not to confuse the humppa Eläkeläiset plays to much more formal, dance-oriented humppa most Finnish humppa groups play. E: Typo User:Woden  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.246.71.171 (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Eläkeläiset and humppa