lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Roskilde Cathedral

message: Just out of curiosity what is the source for the Harald Bluetooth confusion? As far as I know the cathedral was built on the site of the original church built by him and where he is supposed to be resting. At least according to Saxo. What other places have been named as possible places he might be buried? EconomicsGuy (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which confusion is it that are referring to? --Saddhiyama (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Better late than never: The confusion stems from the legend that when the current cathedral was being built, the remains of Harald Bluetooth was supposedly walled up into one of the pillars near the Sanctuary. The remains have never been found (though the remains of Svend Estridsen have been confirmed to be present in "his" pillar).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KDLarsen (talk • contribs) 01:41, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Harald Bluetooth

message: the loss of the queen's earthly remains would mean a significant loss in income from requiems....
This needs some explaining for modern audiences. Sca (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a clause to the sentence explaining how this would work. RomanSpa (talk) 07:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured it was something like that. Sca (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Requiems

message: There has - for example -  never been a "Queen Ingrid of Sweden" - perhaps whoever created the big mess in the list of burials would like to clean all that up? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Ridiculous names of queens

message: The width is claimed to be 27 m, but that is only the width at the middle, excluding the west face and all the additions. Across the west face it is 32.7 m wide. The nave is 24 m tall in the middle of the rib vault.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.59.52.2 (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width and some other measurements
Talk:Normal School for Colored Girls

message: Did the school ever start admitting men? The name change to "Institution for the Education of Colored Youth" suggests it might have. —Angr 06:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Men?

message: The standard rule on Wikipedia is that we use the most recent name for an institution for an the article name.  Since this particular institution ceased to be its own entity with its merger, the most recent name would be Miner Teachers College.  However, someone has set that page to redirect to Normal School for Colored Girls, which is the opposite of what should be happening.  Can someone who's better with these things please reverse that?  Thank you!  Beginning (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just edited the article to reflect "Miner Normal School", which is the NRHP program name for the place, as an alternate, bolded, name in the lead.  Other alternative names can be stated in bold similarly in a "known also as ___, ____, or ___" phrase in the intro, and the whole NRHP phrase which i put into the intro can be removed from there (in which case please link the later NRHP mention in the text).  But the NRHP name should be retained in the NRHP infobox for the article.  All alternative names used in that way should redirect to this article.  I don't know which is the primary, most suitable name for the article.  It's not necessarily the most recent name.  Like, if someone bought the Empire State Building, it could be noted in its article that it is now officially named by its new owner as "D. Trump Renovation Project of 2009" or whatever, but the world-wide commonly known name for the place should be retained as the article title. doncram (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Hey, this article is really pretty good already.  Perhaps it could be developed a bit more and be put up for wp:PR and/or as a wp:GAC.  A very good source to develop the article would be the NRHP inventory/nomination document for the site, which was probably prepared in 1990 or 1991.  It would be available, for free, upon request to nr_reference (at) nps.gov. doncram (talk) 22:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I finally found a picture of Myrtilla. She's a hard one to locate. Anyway, I'll gather some possible sources and post them here. Two of the reference links currently in the article don't appear to be working. APK is ready for Spring 01:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Development of article
Talk:Huangmei opera

message: The following text was moved from the article: olivier 10:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Text removal

message: Someone informed me that a person by the name of Gong Wang (江橫) sang the music for the film The Kingdom and the Beauty (江山美人)?  I cannot find anything on this person.  But if this is true.  This person may be the very FIRST famous Huangmei singer in Hong Kong that everybody forgot. Benjwong 04:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First bigtime artist?

message: The Huangmei County article says that it came from Huangmei County, Hubei, near Anhui. If accurate, this should be added to the article. Badagnani 18:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hubei?

message: It should be added what language(s) it is sung in. It's sung in Mandarin on the video clips I've seen, but is it also sung in Cantonese or other dialects? Badagnani 18:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Traditionaly, it was sung in Anqing dialect.--刻意(Kèyì) 04:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: Many of the recent huangmei clips on YouTube feature synthesizer accompaniment instead of traditional Chinese instruments. This should be noted in the article. Badagnani 18:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Synthesizer??  That sounds far too modern for this art. Benjwong 03:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruments 

message: — Assignment last updated by Qingangying (talk) 20:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ESL Workshop
Talk:VEST/Archive 1

message: VEST may be designed to be efficient in hardware, but it's still worth mentioning how dire it is in software.  It's not unusual for one end of a comms link to be hardware (eg the mobile phone) and the other in software (eg the base station).  The base station can afford a few extra cycles to make life easier for the phone hardware designers, but the staggering software cost of this cipher is another thing again.  Contrast to Trivium, which does quite nicely in hardware, but manages a very respectable 12 cycles/byte in software. — ciphergoth 10:07, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
: Ah, fair enough. — Matt Crypto 10:52, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Efficiency in software

message: Ben, can you please refrain from using Wikipedia for publishing original research or marketing texts? You seem to be really attached to Sean's design as if it was your own. It's understandable, but please make sure that all the information you post here is verifiable, and provide links to the sources of information if necessary. Thanks! — Ruptor 08:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest Changes

message: I have removed a lot of posts from here that were 1) misplaced, 2) my fault sparking those arguments in the first place purely thanks to my initial ignorance of Wikipedia rules and guidelines, and 3) no longer relevant to the page in the light of the latest cipher specification updates. I apologise to everyone I have offended here with my natural rudeness. If anyone finds those posts highly important, feel free to bring them back to life. I won't revert them. — Ruptor 08:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd rather the discussion stayed; restored. — ciphergoth 19:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mind explaining why? — Ruptor 23:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated Posts
Talk:Metrosideros polymorpha

message: I removed the picture of Calliandra haematocephala, it was not a picture of Metrosideros polymorpha.  
Jacob
I fixed the okinas so that all of them now look right (the ‘ looks right in bold but not regular text), as well as clarifying the names.  KarlM 18:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I added some additional information on rapid 'ohi'a death. This seems to be a rapidly growing problem. Someone with expertise in this area may want to expand this section further. I also added information at Ceratocystis fimbriata, although it seems that 2 newly published Ceratocystis species are actually responsible for the disease. I'm not sure if those species require their own articles, or if the information should be consolidated somewhere (maybe in this article?).GeoGreg (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rapid 'ohi'a death 

message: I have a very strong memory of this plant having thin roots that can find their way through cracks in lava fields. But I'm having a hard time finding any better evidence than this paper/picture and this picture. Maybe someone else will have better luck?
 JulesAltis (talk) 07:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roots in lava flows
Talk:Ken Climo

message: This is skewed due to the fact he has not played and the competition being way better than it was. Paul McBeth is the Goat currently. More people are getting into the sport and plus, winning one event per year does not shape you as being the best player of all time. Granted World Championship SHOULD BE the be all end all, but alas the game has not come that far yet... There are many factors that go into being "the goat". Paul McBeth has 5 world titles, 11 major wins, 20 National tour wins, and counting. Also, he is the highest rated player of all time. The rating system is not perfect by any means but he is the most consistent disc golfer so far. Nfeneo (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken Climo Goat? Paul McBeth is the real Goat.... Currently
Talk:Clan of the White Lotus

message: I don't know how many times I have had to correct people over this, but Lo Lieh does not play Pak Mei in this film.  That part is played by Wilson Tong.  Lo Lieh plays the "brother" of White Eyebrows, White Lotus.  If one watches the film in its original language, one can clearly hear Wilson Tong referred to as Pak Mei at the beginning of the film, right before he is killed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.78.34 (talk) 16:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lo Lieh is NOT Pak Mei
Talk:Legendary Weapons of China

message: It is annoying that someone has written the plot based on the English dub of the film, rather than a subtitled copy. Many of the subtle plot points are missed, and the use of the word 'pugilism', whilst amusing in a 'typical of the time' dubbing way just gets annoying after a while.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.104.138 (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?
Talk:The Deadly Mantis (1978 film)

message: The shortening of the plot summary done in 9 April 2015 "to make it disconfusing" actually makes it quite confusing, since it removed several central paragraphs. It's like watching the movie about a third of the way and then jumping directly to the final scene. More importantly, it removes the critical section that describes how Wei Fung learned the praying mantis from the actual insect. I believe the paragraphs removed from the 6 July 2014 version should all be reinstated. If it is still desired to shorten the plot, the paragraph describing the fighting tests can be trimmed, and perhaps some others, while retaining continuity.  JmA (talk) 02:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:SK Telecom Open

message: Official website has Park Nam-sin winning in 1999 and 2000 (see: http://eng.kgt.co.kr/tournaments/sch_main.aspx?game_code=1999110005000 http://eng.kgt.co.kr/tournaments/sch_main.aspx?game_code=2000110005000) not Park No-seok. Park No-seok seems to have won in 1997; see http://eng.kgt.co.kr/players/result.aspx?man_code=00000196 select 1997 and translate to English (gives: 1997.06.05~06.08	1st SK Telecom Classic	1	75	71	71	68	285(-3)) Previous list probably comes from here: https://www.where2golf.com/tournament.aspx?t=to&v=48705 . BTW We have some Park Nam-Sin variants. Nigej (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed by http://www.sktelecomopen.com/html/open.asp?htype=winner Nigej (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Park No-seok or Park Nam-sin (1999, 2000)
Talk:Rules of golf

message: Shouldn't there maybe be a section of this article outlining some of the basic rules of golf?Alexander Phipps 13:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made an attempt to summarize the Rules of Golf, as published by the USGA, in one or two sentences each and in outline format. If anyone thinks that it would be better to format the rules in a way that the Contents template can detail, changes can be made, but as the section is several screens long I thought of valor, and its better part. Liko81 (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Types of Rules

message: ...then why the rules are not listed? --88.114.30.60 16:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Wikipedia is not a guide book or user manual and because the Rules of Golf are copyright. Wikipeterproject (talk) 01:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  If Wikipedia is so wise... 

message: Rules of Golf (note capitalisation) redirects here.  Rules of Golf is the name of a publication published by the R&A Rules Limited and The United States Golf Association.  As such, I think the redirect is wrong.  This page (Rules of golf) should redirect to Rules of Golf, not the other way around.  Any thoughts?  Wikipeterproject (talk) 19:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given no objection, I think I will make the move.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 01:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.  Lack of consensus.  The article is not only about the publication.  Recommend making Rules of Golf (note cap) be about the publication and have hat link notes from each article to the other. Born2cycle (talk) 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rules of Golf 

message: The redirect Strict rules has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Strict rules]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Stymie

message: This Cambridge club should be given its own page as it has got only a tenuous link i.e. the name to the ancient rule of golf.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.238.166 (talk) 23:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Stymies 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 04:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 February 2021
Talk:Johan Oscar Smith

message: I cleaned this article up and would self-rate it as a class B biography.  Interested in another assessment.Wikisuperfixer 14:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I don't know about these classes. (A link to how the assessment works would have helped.) But the article was IMO in pretty serious need of a NPOV edit and a less devout tone, which I have supplied. It was too much about Smith's Friends, too. Of course Smith's founding of SF was what makes him notable, but the information about the movement in this article still needs to be angled in a biographic way, not lose sight of Smith himself and go off at a tangent about Smith's Friends today. In my immodest opinion, I've made the article a good deal more encyclopedic. Bishonen | talk 21:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

text: P.S. Now I've found the link to the rating project above. Too, too much reading, can't face it, sorry. Bishonen | talk 21:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Franco Ambrosetti

message: I was originally going to do his Dad, but he seems to be easier to find stuff about.--T. Anthony 11:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mia Martini

message: Is cause of death normally highlighted as a salient point for singers?
Deepsoulstarfish (talk) 01:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death? 

message: This Associated Press] article says her body was found at home which is different than what the article states.4meter4 (talk) 03:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  found dead at apartment or her home?
Talk:Triple Threat DVD/CD Combo

message: I am learning and I hope I did this correct Menudo site had internal links to other DVD and CD's but not this one.
I am seeking adoption so to help me do it right.--Blue5864 11:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Links provided only prove its existence. Notability is still in question. I'll give it a few days, but if not improved, I will request AFD. Thanks. --Wolfer68 (talk) 19:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:USS Fogg

message: From the DESA Roll of Honor https://www.desausa.org/de_roll_of_honor.htm
USS FOGG (DE/DER-57) 
20 December 1944 
Boyce B. Beale, Jr. S 1/C 
James M. Beardsworth Y 2/C 
Russell S. Boston S 1/C 
James Branson EM 2/C 
James J. Capogreca PhM 3/C 
Richard N. Johnson M 1/C 
Nellis F. Jones TM 2/C 
Roy A. Loesing S 1/C 
August C. Mattes CEM 
Gordon D. Nichols F 1/C 
James L. Riley TM 3/C 
Clarence A. Walker TM 3/C 
Raymond W. Weber F 1/C 
Andrew W. Yost MM 2/C 
23 December 1944 
Lillon B. Lynch CBM 
Timothy  C. Rizzuto
Executive Director
USS SLATER/Destroyer Escort Historical Museum.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.8.112 (talk) 01:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to the USS FOGG casuality list.
Talk:USS Fechteler (DE-157)

message: The USS Fechteler was sunk in the Mediterranean not in the Atlantic. My dad was in the forward fire room when the torpedo hit. The hatch was jammed from the concussion and he and the other guys in the fire room couldn’t get it open. Fortunately, an officer opened the hatch from the outside and let them out. Before the officer went to see if he could help any other sailors he said to my dad, “Quack, ( Bill Quackenbush) there is nothing more you can do. You had better get over the side.” The officer went down with the ship. Gary Quackenbush (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Talk:Online reputation management

message: According this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reputation#Online_reputation Online reputation means services which uses a system of customer feedback like ebay.com But Web or digital reputation is  the whole real reputation of a person or a company as it is affected by the Web. 
So the terminology is not universal and it is not good. 
(sorry for my English)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreatNonentity (talk • contribs) 09:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Online or Web reputation?

message: Typo? -> mangment should rather be management http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_reputation_management —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.186.92.26 (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks for pointing out the typo. The article has now been moved to appropriate title. utcursch | talk 12:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo?

message: Is this me, or this article is actually one-sided and its only point is to explain how ORM is good? From the customer point of view ORM is a questionable practice at best because negative opinions certainly aren't going to be promoted whether they are valid or not.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.64.169.1 (talk • contribs) 
:A. There is only one side to this service, be proactive and market yourself or service before someone else does it for you. Negative opinions can be promoted if search engine algorythms deem the webpages containing the content are valueable and useful, proactively working to make positive reviews more valuable in search engine results will diminish harm done by negative reviews.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfezziwig (talk • contribs) 14:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: I'll be spending the next week or so cleaning up the existing references and reorganising their position within the article. I'll be adding new and more reliable references where possible and insert internal links. The overall quality of the article needs improving and I'll look at splitting the information into sections. Biggleswiki (talk) 14:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References & Article Quality

message: In a NYT article,
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/fashion/03reputation.html?pagewanted=all
it is mentioned that one aspect of this practice concerns Wikipedia articles. One assumes online reputation companies may attempt to edit articles on their clients. This appears to me to be a valid bit of information, although citations will be needed more than unproven allegations. But found today little more interest information in which how online reputation management service works and what the main thing we need our eyes on it mentioned clearly. I ask for assistance.
Mydogtrouble (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online Encyclopedia alterations?
Talk:Luud Schimmelpennink

message: Sorry, don't know how to make a title change. The heading shoud properly read Luud Schimmelpennink. Thanks. ericbritton 12:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I linked to the Dutch article for you, but my account is too new to move. You can move it yourself with the "Move" function at the top of the main article; it's pretty easy, and you can check Help:Moving a page if you're having problems. – ipso 12:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks so much. Done. ericbritton 16:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One link is not enough for an article, so I am suggesting a merge with that one article. Please do not remove tags without fixing the problem as that can be considered vandalism. Thanks! Sincerely,  Mattisse 12:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, you need to be adding references as you go along. It is much harder to do so later on. Every article must follow the Wikipedia policy of WP:V and WP:RS following WP:CITE. I did not tag the article as unsourced but I will if you do not make efforts to provide references.  Sincerely,  Mattisse 12:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks so much, but LS is a significant force in the field of alternative thinking about cities, innovation and publioc policy, and while he is indeed just about the patron saint of those community cycles that are now crnaking up, there is significantly more to his work and contributions than that. I shall try to complete the article to refelct this in the next two days, and in the meantime am drawing it to the attention of a number of people with international crediatils in the field in which he works so that they can help complete. In the menatime I appreciate your guidance and patience. ericbritton 13:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Thank you! Sincerely, Mattisse 13:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is linkless & editor is removing linkless tag - suggest merge to the one article it links to 
Talk:Proserpine

message: Proserpine is a common name for Proserpina; note that Project Gutenberg has two books with Proserpine in the title referring to the mythical character. (Funny enough, it's also in Firefox's English dictionary, unlike Proserpina.) On the other hand, Proserpina, Queenland is a city of 4000 people with no particular historical importance. So I put the redirect to the disamib page rather than the city.--Prosfilaes 12:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled