lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Valentyna Shevchenko (politician)

message: Шевченко Валентина Семенівна
Національний фонд соціального захисту матерів і дітей "Україна - дітям",  почесний президент
БІОГРАФІЯ
Кандидат педагогічних наук, член Наглядової ради.
Народилась 12 березня 1935 р. у м. Кривий Ріг Дніпропетровської області.
Освіта вища, у 1960 р. закінчила Київський університет ім. Т.Шевченка. Кандидатська дисертація "Особливості пізнавальних інтересів підлітків та основні шляхи їх зміцнення в позакласній роботі" (Київський педагогічний інститут, 1972 р.).
З 1954 р. - старша піонервожата, вчитель, секретар Криворізького МК ЛКСМУ.
З 1960 р. - секретар Дзержинського РК КПУ м. Кривого Рогу.
З 1962 р. - секретар ЦК ЛКСМУ.
З 1969 р. - заступник міністра освіти УРСР.
З 1972 р. - голова президії Українського товариства дружби і культурних зв'язків із зарубіжними країнами.
З 1975 р. - заступник Голови, з 1985 р. по 05.1991 р. - голова Президії ВР УРСР.
Пенсіонерка з 1991 р.
Депутат ВР УРСР 9-11 скликань. Депутат ВР СРСР 11 скликання.
У 1989-1991 рр. - народний депутат СРСР від Київського сільського національно-територіального виборчого округу № 34, член ВР СРСР.
З 09.1997 р. - почесний президент Національного фонду соціального захисту матерів і дітей "Україна - дітям".
Член ЦК КПУ з 1976 р., член Політбюро ЦК КПУ з 1985 р., член ЦК КПРС з 1986 р.
:This is the english Wiki, so if you want others to take part in the discussion, you might want to use Latin letters. --dllu 15:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography
Talk:Classical theory and special relativity

message: I'm still not altogether happy with this page, I may have to consider a rewrite. ErkDemon 05:38, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not even sure it's an article at all: it reads like a draft for a paper. Encyclopedia articles aren't in first person, and they shouldn't contain original research or original theorizing, which parts of this appear to be. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. - DavidWBrooks 02:08, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Assault & Flattery

message: Contrary to what is being said in the article, on the cover and the back of the booklet it clearly states that this is a record made by "Toronto & Holly Woods", so I changed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.84.30 (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Toronto & Holly Woods
Talk:Rectovaginal fistula

message: There are multiple references to the condition being related to childbirth, but written in way that leaves it ambiguous which party develops the fistula.
Techguy95 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity reference to childbirth/delivery: Does the fistula appear in the newborn post-delivery or in the mother?
Talk:Kingdom of Fear (book)

message: get a significant expansion or be deleted altogether.  This article is a stub among stubs as it is now.  Could some Hunter S Thompson aficionado, without getting POV, provide a little meat-n-bones to this please?  --I am not good at running 23:22, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to either... 

message: While someone's at it fix the paragraph under plot summary. It's embarrassing in a Hunter S. Thompson related article that the first line is an incomplete sentence. That's not gonzo, it's shitzo. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 11:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plus
Talk:Acropolis Now

message: :This term became popular with "wogs", and to a lesser extent Anglo-Celtic people, especially in Melbourne.
Ok.. what the hell is that doing here? --Irishpunktom\talk 16:16, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: what

message: The page says that the building at 251 Brunswick Street was used as the exterior of the café. I'm pretty certain that's not correct, I recently went there and it doesn't look anything like it. Unfortunately I found at least one other source (twistedhistory.net.au) that also mentions that address. Can this be checked and corrected? Logicman1966 (talk) 11:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I was wrong (at least partially). That building was indeed used as the exterior, but only in Seasons 2 - 5. A different one was used in Season 1. Logicman1966 (talk) 11:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong address?
Talk:Three godheads (Ayyavazhi)

message: This article isn't really doing anything, and has no room for expansion. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 07:39, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True, and perhaps trimurti is a better place to merge it. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 13:17, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

text: My opinion would depend upon how independent the Ayyavazhi faith is from the Hindu faith.  It appears that the gods of Ayyavazhi come from Narayana (Vishnu) similar to other Hindu-based religions.  I agree with the merge.  Steven McCrary 16:20, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
Steve, ayyavazhi, from their web sites as well as Vaikunda raja's comments, like smartism, believe that Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva are different aspects of the same God. This was written in the article, Ayyavazhi and Hinduism.
In philosophy, they are very similar to Smartism
Raj2004 21:05, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I've merged the three stubs with this this article; it might still belong in Trimurti, but at least it's more substantial for now. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:04, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I think it is better to merge it to trimurthi rather than Ayyavazhi mythology. And I suggest to create a seperate heading inside to state the view of Ayyavazhi about them, especially Thirumal. - Vaikunda Raja
:To my understanding of what Vaikunda Raja is saying, the three Godheads, Sivan-Nathan-Thirumal, are different from the trinity in Ayya Vaikudar (Muthukutty's body; Sampooranathevan, who ascended to the Ultimate Soul; and the spirit of Narayana). Despite the oneness emphasis, the manner in which manifestations of God are presented seems to me to indicate that these manifestations have their own importance, despite their oneness (am I making any sense?).  Maybe the creation of an article as follows would serve this project:
::Title: "The Godhead in Ayyavazhi"
:::1. Ayyavazhi-A monothestic faith
:::2. The Triune Godhead
::::2a. Sivan
::::2b. Nathan
::::2c. Thirumal
:::3. Devas, Yamas, Ultimate Soul, and such
:::4. The incarnation of God in Ayya Vaikundar
::::4a. Muthukutty's body; 
::::4b. Sampooranathevan, who ascended to the Ultimate Soul; and 
::::4c. The Spirit of Narayana.
:It seems to me that the articles on Ayyavazhi must rectify the confusion between the many manifestations of God and the unity of God, and doing it on one page seems better to me than on separate pages.  So, I am in favor of a merge, as I suggested above.  Anyway, my $0.02. Steven McCrary 05:49, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Steve, to compare with Advaita, Ekam is Nirguna Brahman. The various forms of God, Saguna Brahman, is akin to Trimurti
I think that's what I had concluded after talking with Vaikunda.
Raj2004 01:00, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging to Trimurthi
Talk:VU (album)

message: It broke my heart to do it, but I changed the credit for "Foggy Notion".  According to the Peel Slowly And See credits, the song was written by all the band members except Lou Reed, plus an old record producer named Hy Weiss.
The VU CD has no songwriting credits on it -- it only lists the players on each track.
Does anybody have any evidence the PS&S credit is incorrect?  I'd prefer to believe Lou Reed wrote or co-wrote every VU song until he left the band.
--63.25.27.249 17:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you google "Hy Weiss" and "Foggy Notion" there's some interesting reading. The most plausible theory is that Weiss' name was added as either a tribute by Reed, or because a song of Weiss' was quoted and he is given credit. Why "Foggy Notion" doesn't credit Reed as well on Peel Slowly... is a mystery (I don't have it in front of me to check it out), but the version on the Quine Tapes which is a morte recent VU release, credits Reed and Weiss: Reed, plus the others. I'm thinking that's how it should be credited here, since the VU album doesn't list Weiss, Peel Slowly... adds Weiss and omits Reed: the Quine Tapes credit is the most inclusive (since Reed is obviously singing and playing on the song). Freshacconci 17:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship of "Foggy Notion"
Talk:Santror Pirappu

message: Aside form anything lese, the connection between the article's title and its content is completely obscure. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 07:50, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Who or what is the Santror mentioned in the title? John Carter (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tony Barbieri

message: The only thing I know about this actor, is he is the devil himself, Captain America.  I hope others will fill in the rest.  I left it as a "stub", since it's missing basic bio information, like birthdate. --rob 07:54, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Odysseas Elytis

message: This is a terrible translation software dump. --Jpbrenna 08:03, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We're being very inconsistent in our spelling of his first name.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've checked at Greek WP et al, and it seems both his birth name and his pseudonym were always Odysseas, although some sources give him the Odysseus spelling, probably because that's the normal English spelling. I've made the appropriate corrections. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 03:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: OdysseAs or OdysseUs?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Cantus 3/Proposed decision

message: I would like to object to the somewhat tame response from the Arbitrators on this case.  The remedies do not go far enough because they do not make enough difference.
;Cantus banned from certain articles 2) User:Cantus is banned from editing the articles Developed country, Template:Europe and Terri Schiavo 
: This misses the point entirely.  Frankly, these were examples of just a few of his long-term edit wars.  I've added more examples to the evidence to show this, and if I need to go into more detail I will.  Cantus is a persistent edit warrior on any page he works on, articles and templates alike.  Please come up with something that we can use to stop these and all future wars.  I don't know how best to phrase this, but I'd like to make "re-reverting" go away and force him to at least make an effrot to get agreement on talk pages.
;Sockpuppets 1.1) Should User:Cantus use a verifiable sockpuppet to edit articles from which he is banned he may be banned from Wikipedia for one month.
: Please change this to "... from which he is banned , to evade any block, or to evade any other editing restrictions he may be banned from Wikipedia for up to one month."   Most of his sock puppet use comes when he is blocked and also when he wants to revert, but wants to avoid being blocked under his one-revert-per-day restriction.
; Cantus 2 3) Cantus is limited to one revert per article per 24 hour period. Should he violate this, an admin may ban him for a short period of time (up to a week).
: This is the text from a previous case.  Minimally, to avoid confusion and to reflect the fact that he revert wars on templates and other pages, please make this revert restriction apply to any page.  
For continued disruption, edit warring, and especially block evasion and sockpuppetry, I'd also like to see if any hard-bans could also be considered.  Thanks for looking into this. -- Netoholic @ 13:47, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Even while this case open, Cantus continues this behavior.  He is currently on a 3-day block from Talrias, yet is employing  &  to continue reverting and working. -- Netoholic @ 06:15, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not nearly far enough
Talk:Rubbadubbers

message: That paragraph about "if only" was really clear in my head. When I came to write it it has come out all garbled I am sure.
Will try to tidy it up at some point, but if someone else wants to then please feel free!
--JimmyTheWig 08:24, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Hi all. Just a quick note to ask anyone passing with knowledge of the show to verify the airdates, since 2 editors on IP have listed different dates for the airing of Rubbadubbers on NickJr.  If someone could check them and insert the correct dates, it would be fantastic. :) Thor Malmjursson (talk) 04:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AirDates have been fact tagged 

message: I just found this https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0078pr6 database of BBC programming. It's a very reliable source, and can be used to correct the episodes listings (but I don't have the time right now). Someone really have messed with the article, probably the returning vandal. Anyway, episode 1 of season 1 is Traindriver Tubb Scary Finbar and nothing else: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0078j5b. Sjö (talk) 08:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC source
Talk:House of Bjelbo

message: I had 2 questions about this article.  
# Why is the title "House of Bjelbo", but the first line is about "Family of Bjälbo"?  Why Family instead of House, but more importantly, why Bjälbo instead of Bjelbo?
# "The royal family originated from Bjelbo line was descended from Jarl Birger whose two sons ascended the Swedish throne."  I don't understand what this means.
Bubamara 08:33, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Q's

message: :House of Bjelbo →  – In modern literature, Bjälbo is more common spelling than Bjelbo (see Ngram). The exact phrases, "House of Bjälbo" and "House of Bjelbo" return only a few matches in Google Books, but searches like Folkung+Bjälbo and Folkung+Bjelbo indicate that also in the dynastic context 'Bjälbo' is more common. The umlaut does not influence the choice of the name per WP:DIACRITICS. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 10:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Sweden, WikiProject Middle Ages, WikiProject Norse history and culture, and WikiProject Royalty and Nobility have been notified of this discussion. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

text: Support – Seems to be supported by web search. Mathglot (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 May 2024
Talk:Kerry Packer

message: The current citation for the statement that he claims oblivion contains nothing is something like a tabloid talking about a person claiming to channel spirits. This source is not reliable. Please replace this citation with something more authoritative, preferably a well-known news website. -- Newagelink (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a better citation and edited the previous quotation, but someone should review the previously-existing one to see if it supports everything claimed. -- Newagelink (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better citation needed for 'nothing there' afterlife comment
Category talk:Early British railway companies

message: We have conflict here with :Category:early British railway companies
and :Category:British railway lines
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chevin (talk • contribs) 02:50, July 13, 2005.
:The latter category was deleted on March 11, 2008. Slambo (Speak) 11:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category clash
Talk:China's Famous Teas

message: Unfortunately I can't get to directly check that this is the official list of the Chinese Tea Culture Research Centre, if anyone can, please do so. --Iateasquirrel 09:45, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that a Chinese person made this article. 98.227.189.232 (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you say that? Someone the Person (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

text: My Chinese language skills are not strong: I used information from the linked articles. jmcw (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official list 

message: Some are not the same?
:中國十大名茶列表君山銀針（黃茶）
:都勻毛尖（綠茶）
:信陽毛尖（綠茶）icetea8 (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese sister page(some differences?)

message: Several external sites have been removed: I have found some of them useful.
*Famous Chinese Teas
*List of notable teas
Any other opinions? jmcw (talk) 07:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that this is a reference for the article. jmcw (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Per AfD and no one who suggested a merge doing a merge. Feel free to do so in a manner reflective of the references. --Cold Season (talk) 04:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Just redirected this
Talk:Communication skill

message: Come to think of it, isn't this article describing rhetoric? Perhaps it should just be a redirect. Pburka 15:23, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The current contents of this page are inappropriate, as discussed above. Unless someone objects, I intend to redirect this page to rhetoric. Rhetoric covers the whole field of persuasive use of language so seems to be an appropriate redirect for this article. Pburka 00:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhetoric?

message: On 7 March 2011 User:Fæ placed a  template on this article, noting that it was an essay. In fact that essay appears to have been copied from ezinearticles.com ("The Importance of Communication Skills" by Carl Formby 2007), probably in violation of copyright. I have reverted the page to an earlier version, before the copyrighted material was added. Since this version is not an essay, I have not re-added the PROD tag. If users still feel that the page should be deleted, it may be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 17:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Grafton bus crash

message: This article has been kept as a result of this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:00, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Professor Monkey-For-A-Head

message: Kudos to those who added the quotations. Man I miss that show. . . Coyote-37 10:00, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Christian Heinrich Heineken

message: Is this all that is known of him?  I would like to know more if anyone has any sources.  Thanks
:I read somewhere that he wrote a history book at age three. I must admit though the claims about him are so extreme that a bit of skepticism seems warranted. Especially as many of the sites I've seen on him are paranormalist or believe that he proves the existence of reincarnation.--T. Anthony 08:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: --24.126.30.46 08:53, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Adding the folklore deal was a good idea, but this should not be deleted. It was an important story in the history of stories about prodigies. Even though it's exaggerated and odd it's still culturally notable. Like the story about that Egyptian magician who supposedly lived a 120 years and could reattach the severed heads of chickens.(I'm not making this up, I just can't remember his name. He existed in the Pyramid building age, around the time of Khufu or Cheops) Anyway that story is likely bunk, but if we don't have an article on him we should.--T. Anthony 02:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His name was Dedi. We don't have an article on him, but I'll start one.--T. Anthony 13:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the folklore note should be moved to the top of the page just for clarity.  The fantastic elements could make it hard to swallow for a reader, as we saw above. If you think it should go back to the bottom, I won't object.
--69.19.14.36 21:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This source from 1838 makes his story sound a bit more plausible or at least comparable to other prodigies. It states. 
#He repeated words at ten months, not shortly after birth.
#He spoke three languages by age three, but could not necessarily read in them. 
#He did not know how to write until shortly before his death. 
--T. Anthony (talk) 12:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Folklore Note Placement
Talk:Janice Huff

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:24, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Swing Bridge, River Tyne

message: Is not one major point about this bridge that it made obsolete the Tyne keel, which carried coal to the colliers that shipped it out of the Tyne to the various markets in which it was sold? The ability to load coal directly into colliers must have been a huge cost saving for the transport of coal. Can no expert on the Tyne find a good source to expand on this point? I only have references that make passing mention of this. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  end of the Tyne keel?
Talk:Calvary Christian High School (Florida)

message: Victuallers 20:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Civil Contingencies Committee

message: We need an overall article on this topic - showing how they all link together. Secretlondon 10:59, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

message: According to the article's current text, "The Civil Contingencies Committee, through the Civil Contingencies Secretariat, operates a website, UK Resilience, which is intended as a central source of public information on British civil defence and disaster preparedness activities."
I can't find the website mentioned from a quick DDG / Google search, and a look into the Wayback Machine didn't help either; perhaps it should be deleted? 86.22.132.173 (talk) 01:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Resilience Website?
Talk:Dial M For Monkey

message: I was wondering if we could vote on this, since Dial M For Monkey and Justice Pals are merely Dexter's Lab sideshows. Could someone also do me a favor and post this on Request for Comment or whatever? Thanks. -- A Link to the Past 11:00, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
:I decided to be bold and merge them. --FuriousFreddy 06:11, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Roche lobe

message: Most of the sources I can find seem to indicate that the roche lobe and the hill sphere are really the same thing. (the latter being a spherical approximation of the former?). They both have similar definitions and represent the same concept as far as my understanding goes.
However the article on the Hill sphere seems to say that the two must not be confused.
Is anyone able to clarify this?
(I posted this on the talk pages for both articles, I hope I'm not violating any guidelines?)
69.157.226.139 16:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: uh oh, the wiki police are going to come after you...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.140 (talk) 17:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hill sphere

message: Can anyone find a good picture of this?  This article seems like it could use some visuals. --Ignignot 22:10, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: let's fire up the old starship and snap you some pictures...8x10s okay? don't get too close to that gravity well over there...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.140 (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: This article needs to be written to be a little more friendly to the non-scientist.  Anyone up to the task? -- Renesis13 20:28, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Readability

message: The mesh in the upper portion of the illustration is not well explained.  Does it just show the shape of the equipotention in that portion of space, or is it more significant?  A shadow-mesh of the actual Roche lobe, would also be helpful, as well as a more firm visual indicator of the lobes themselves (which are actually 3D, not 2D as in the illustration). -- Beland 23:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration question

message: This article gives no references, except for the image. - Jmabel | Talk 16:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: The way the introduction to the article is worded, one could be forgiven for thinking the concept only applies to stars for some pecuiliar reason. Also, the issue of the difference to the Hill sphere, raised in a previous comment should be addressed. It would perhaps be easy enough to track down these issues if someone had bothered to reference the article. Deuar 21:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  not only stars