Talk:Belfast Blitz

message: I found it difficult to write the 'human cost' paragraph.  There were too many tragic stories.  In the end I opted to repeat quotes from primary sources which are in several books.  
Dr Brian Barton has published most on this topic, however there are instances where he seems to have a 'orange' tinge to his writing.
I didn't include 'ditching', it was difficult to summarise. For months some people left the city every night and slept in ditches with a deterioration in hygine, manners, etc
There are different accounts as to who sent the telegram to whom.  It probably was sent to the Dublin City manager rather than to deV.  For now I opted to follow what many books say.
It would be good to get photos of the blitz.  Plenty exist.  But they seem to be copyright.
I left out later discussions.  deV wanted to help.  Offers were rejected.  e.g. joining the electricity grids - at the time the south had a surplus of power from ard na crusha
I left out discrimination in - for example the 'home guard' (Dad's Army) had to take an oath which effectively excluded nationalists
Ok, any suggestions? --ClemMcGann 09:45, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First Edit

message: ===Belfast Blitz===
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.See footnote
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day.  See footnote
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.See footnote 
*Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.See footnote
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article.See footnote (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.See footnote
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.See footnote
*As per WP:MOSDATE, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
*Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. 
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.See footnote
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*You may wish to convert your form of references to the cite.php footnote system that WP:WIAFA 2(c) highly recommends.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mal 06:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto peer review suggestions 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.See footnote
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day.  See footnote
*See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.See footnote 
*Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.See footnote
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article.See footnote (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.See footnote
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.See footnote
*As per WP:MOSDATE, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
*Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally do not start with the word "The". For example, ==The Biography== would be changed to ==Biography==.
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL. 
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.See footnote
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*You may wish to convert your form of references to the cite.php footnote system that WP:WIAFA 2(c) highly recommends.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mal 06:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Belfast Blitz]]

message: :Image:Basilbrookeborough.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Basilbrookeborough.jpg

message: The image which shows Belfast Lough could be improved if Dublin, Belfast and a scale were also shown - at present this map is a bit scanty. This would then illustrate the two cities' relationship to each other.
I would do it myself, but lack the knowledge. So, any takers ? RASAM (talk) 13:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: From all accounts I have read the city centre suffered more damage in the 4/5 May "Fire Raid". The article states that Bridge Street was "effectively obliterated" in the 15/16 April Easter raid but on that occasion the Luftwaffe had turned its full force onto North Belfast districts especially the New Lodge, Antrim Road, Lower Shankill and York Street. Their targets were the Waterworks, Victoria Barracks and mills. The section in the second raid needs to be expanded to include the devastation visited upon East Belfast, city centre and the Harland and Wolff shipyard.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  City centre bombardment 

message: Substituted at 09:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Belfast Blitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150713203032/http://multitext.ucc.ie/d/The_BlitzBelfast_during_the_second_World_War to http://multitext.ucc.ie/d/The_BlitzBelfast_during_the_second_World_War
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Belfast Blitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120922035553/http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0083/D.0083.194106050027.html to http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0083/D.0083.194106050027.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621041418/http://secondworldwarni.org/ to http://www.secondworldwarni.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belfast Blitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621041418/http://secondworldwarni.org/ to http://www.secondworldwarni.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is there any conformation from a credible source that William Joyce ever made such a comment ? A lot of comments attributed to Joyce tended to be of dubious veracity and not backed up by reports/transcripts from official monitoring services. Joyce's broadcasts were monitored by the BBC, Irish Army and (US) Foreign Broadcast Intelligence service so the If such a comment were ever actually broadcast there is likely to be a record of it somewhere. 109.144.221.170 (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Easter Eggs for Belfast"