lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Plat of Zion

message: I have merged this article to Zion (Latter Day Saints).  The information contained herein is better suited over there where it has more context; this information was not well cited and contained some claims that have been disputed.  Merging it into the larger context of the Zion concpet itself helps to alleviate these concerns. Shereth 18:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Donald Black (sociologist)

message: I wrote a criticism section which, unlike any other part of this article, has intext citations.  It was deleted by someone for reasons that are not completely clear.  Below I have copied and pasted the section of the history that deleted my contribution:
(cur) (last)  02:39, 13 July 2007 66.218.56.108 (Talk) (5,111 bytes) (→Criticism - inapprop to inc criticism of person; no one criticizes the person - and crit was copied verbatim from its approp location, in Pure Sociology article) (undo)
If the criticism section deserves to be deleted, please defend that argument here.
RedHouse18 22:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue Censorship of Criticism

message: The clarification of "ideas" is much better - not redundant now, good edit. KillerChihuahua 13:52, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas

message: This was taken from Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-01-12#Criticism of Donald Black, created by User:61.1.24.94. I added it here because it doesn't seem like it should have an article of its own. If any of it is accurate, somebody more knowledgeable about this person can add it in. -- kenb215 talk 19:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Donald Black 

message: * Bodenheimer Edgar,JURISPRUDENCE, PHILOSOPHY AND METHOD OF LAW, Revised Edition, pg- 379
* Brian Z Tamnaha, REALISTIC SOCIO-LEGALTHEORY, Clarendon Press Oxford, 1997
* Black’s Law Dictionary
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_positivism
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/selffulfilling_prophecy
61.1.24.94 18:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:List of prime ministers of Canada by religious affiliation

message: Eliminated the "gay bashing" comment and the view that Harper views Canadians as the same as Americans. Really - I understand people have different political views, but that is no excuse to write potentially actionable stuff on here. Let's try and keep things civil. Esp. with respect to the "gay bashing" thing - holding a debate is not the same as bashing.
I must confess that I do not understand the designation of Dief as an "Evangelical" Baptist. Surely there's no other kind. Unless it means he's a Fellowship Baptist, in which case the link should be to Fellowship of Evangelical Baptist Churches in Canada. Carolynparrishfan 13:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diazonium compound

message: Unless there are any objections, I will merge diazonium and diazo into this article in a week or so. Edgar181 13:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Edgar181 19:55, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

message: A mechanism of its formation from amine and HNO2 would be great! Aaadddaaammm 03:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: On the nanotechnology section. Electrografting to chromium has been reported which is to the left of iron in the periodic table. Hinge, Pedersen, New Journal of Chemistry, 33, 2009, 2405  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.44.218 (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update required 

message: Sodium stannite = Sodium stannate(IV) is hardly a reducing agent. There may be a sodium stannate(II) which should be expected to have reducing properties.150.227.15.253 (talk) 10:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement by hydrogen 

message: Take a look at the section: "General properties and reactivity"
*Hefty section diazomethane is tangential because diazomethane is not a diazonium compound
*"In terms of reactivity, the chemistry of diazonium salts is dominated by their propensity to dediazotize..."... the dominant and useful chem is probably diazo coupling, hands down.
*Where is the X-ray data?
*"Arenediazonium salts are exceptionally versatile reagents for chemical synthesis..." seems like an overstatement. Yes, they do a lot of reactions, but they are seldom in my experience.
--Smokefoot (talk) 15:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Overvew of "General properties ..."
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals/Data

message: Perhaps this page should be linked to:
* Chemistry_resources,
* Chemical_database,
* Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemicals/Data_book.
Antrax 14:04, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

message: If I understand the proposal made by User:Antrax, the objective is to have all these merged under one name. However, which article should be retained and which others should be converted into re-directs has not been specified. Also, another point of debate is if this article should be in the main namespace or article namespace. Also, there can be disagreement about the merger. So, it would be great if someone can structure the discussion along these lines. I am centralising the merge discussion here to prevent cross-talk on the talkpages of other candidates for the merger. --Gurubrahma 17:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I support merging Chemical resources into Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Data, with a delete of Chemical resources as Wikipedia is NOT a collection of external links. Judgement reserved on the others. Physchim62 (talk) 13:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Support. I agree with Physchim62. --PeR 22:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged Chemistry resources into this page, cleanup to follow.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/Data book]] and [[Chemistry resources]] 

message: Dear all, we are busy setting up a page comparable to the Special:Booksources page, at the moment I am collecting links there, where possible deeplinks.  I therefore propose to merge the data on this page into that page, and remove this page (I will copy the links that I do not have ASAP).  
By the way, any help would be appreciated setting up the programming of the 'special page'.  Cheers!  --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed merge .. seems not right, there are many links related to chemicals, which should be on Chemical sources, but the other links should not be.  So, it needs a cleanup (hence, I put in that template).  --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: And Removed the cleanup template .. this page is quite OK, the other serves a different function.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks Beetstra for your involvement!, I´ll help restructuring this part of the wiki. Antrax 15:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge into [[Chemical sources]]
Talk:Italicus Express bombing

message: This page should be moved to something like Italicus Express killing or something like that. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 14:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved it to: Italicus Express bombing 1974. Biscuittin (talk) 14:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I have added an Italian reference and a Google translation but I am not much the wiser.  Can anyone shed more light on the events that preceded the bombing? Biscuittin (talk) 15:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there may be a connection with the 1974 Piazza della Loggia bombing. Biscuittin (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: In the list of victims, there's mention of one 'Wìlbelmus Jacobus Hanema', a name which sounds Dutch. But shouldn't that be 'Wilhelmus', with an 'h' instead of a 'b'?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeverityOne (talk • contribs) 06:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of victims 

message: "Ordine Nero" and "Ordine Nuovo" are different italian's far right groups, with some common members. The Italicus bombing was planned by "Ordine Nero" (see  or ). "Ordine Nuovo" was disbanded and outlawed in november 1973, some months before the Italicus bombing.--Yoggysot (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ordine Nero" and "Ordine Nuovo"
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Odee Company

message: Following comment by user:BuzzTatom has been copied to the main discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Odee Company:
I am the person that wrote the article. This was only meant as a history of a 83 year old company with an intersting history of how it came about. I did not go into the history as much as I should have but I also did not want it to appear as though this was an advertisement. I have read the tutorial and first article pages. Can either of the people who put this up for deletion expound on their thoughts. I could go into how we are a $10 million dollar company which by PIA(Printing Industry of America)standards this is considered a rather large company.
Just not sure what is stepping across the line or how to correct what editors don't like about this so to get this reinstated.
* Hi; I copied this into the body of the main discussion (see above). Please check there for your reply. (Now that I think about it, I guess it's kind of counter-intuitive that discussion regarding AfDs goes in the AfD-article-section instead of the discussion page. Anyhow, please post comments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Odee Company.) Fourohfour 15:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rolls-Royce aircraft piston engines

message: This is intended as the 'story of' Rolls-Royce aircraft piston engines, charting the evolution and inovation. PeterGrecian 14:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Surely this was not introduced as a racing engine, even if it was later developed into one. 217.205.121.71 17:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buzzard
Talk:Blanford's fox

message: An interesting piece of research I came across as an undergraduate: Strict monogamy has been observed among Blanford's foxes.
Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347205803240
69.247.116.112 (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strict monogamy observed among Blanford's foxes 
Talk:Tiger (zodiac)

message: who deleted all the stuff on this page and why? - unsigned comment by 
:I did, because (as the edit summary says) it was all a copyvio from here. Tearlach 14:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought the Chinese symbol for 'Year of the Tiger' was 寅, as apposed to 虎, which just means 'Tiger'.  I could be wrong though.  Could somebody please verify which is correct.  Sadako No Deshi 18:48, 18 July 2006 (BST)
I never knew Tigers have a special food (bread or poultry), that's quite interesting. R430nb2 05:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Character

message: If someone wants to rewrite the first sentence to says "Year of the Tiger", then 寅 would be appropriate, but the first sentence is talking about the animal 虎.  --tessc (talk) 22:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 寅 and 虎

message: Hrmpf. In the very minute I finally got the Dog article finished, the new categories were put up into the Deletion candidates. Go here for details, and please tell if you want the categories kept, deleted, or if you got another suggestion entirely. I've stopped editing for now. Teshik 14:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split contested, candidate for deletion

message: Do not reply here; go to centralized discussion at Talk:Rat (zodiac)#Let's remove all the celebrities lists. — coelacan — 18:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove list of people 

message: You are the year of a Tiger, if your birthday is September!!!!!
And the year of the Tiger rocks!!!
We are the best animals of the world!!!
--99.20.134.117 (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year Of The [[Tiger (zodiac)|Tiger]]!!!! 

message: You are the year of a Tiger, if your birthday is September!!!!!
And the year of the Tiger rocks!!!
We are the best animals of the world!!!
--99.20.134.117 (talk) 18:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year Of The [[Tiger (zodiac)|Tiger]]!!!! 

message: I am VERY skeptical that the year of the Tiger is "traditionally associated" with El Salvador. Source please? JosiahHenderson (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country associations  

message: Please chime in at Talk:Rat_(zodiac)#Celebrity_lists,_again regarding removing the list of people from all Chinese zodiac articles. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove list of people, again
Talk:Cubical atom

message: Electrons with antiparallel spin form a fermi heap , higher density, higher electric repulsion. This is correlated with Hunds rule that parallel spins are of lower energy.
 
Electronpair bonding is not because of lower electronic repulsion. Its because of delocalisation ( lower kinetic energy) and nucleus electron attraction (lower potential energy.
09:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:480 BC

message: Sounds rather unlikely to me that the Persians should have conquered Corfu. After all, they were stopped at Salamis.--Proofreader 14:41, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, Corfu mentions that they provided 60 ships against the Persians, but otherwise took no active role. Seems that the Vandals have successfully invaded Wikipedia... Stan 01:36, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This site states this;
"Xerxes encourages the Carthaginians to attack the Greeks in Sicily. Under the Carthaginian military leader, Hamilcar, Carthage sends across a large army.
 The Greek city of Himera in Sicily, in its quarrel with Akragas, enlists Carthaginian support. With the help of Gelo, the tyrant of Syracusae, and Theron of Akragas, the Carthaginians are defeated in the Battle of Himera. After the defeat, Hamilcar kills himself."
Just for what advantage would Carthage support Persian attacks upon what is now considered as Greece?
I await a good response.
But if Carthage was nothing but a "Frankish" possession, and times were removed a NUMBER OF YEARS
into our era, then it would make sense!!  Ronald L. Hughes96.19.147.40 (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carthage in defense of Persia?  Why?
Talk:Name days in Slovakia

message: Wondering where does this list of names come. Is it official?
Slovak transation: Odkial mate ten zoznam?
Odkial si vobec beriete, ze niekto moze mat meno len, ked je to na oficialnom zozname? Nebolo to vari len za socializmu?
odpoved: vela veci co boli za socializmu mame este stale.. :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.99.54.233 (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Section 2 paragraph 2 says:
(2) Nemožno určiť meno hanlivé, neosobné alebo domácku podobu mena, alebo prvé meno totožné s menom žijúceho súrodenca uvedeným v matrike na prvom mieste, alebo osobe mužského pohlavia určiť ženské meno a naopak. Tieto obmedzenia sa nevzťahujú na cudzojazyčné meno, ak je všeobecne známe, že takéto použitie mena je v súlade s tradíciou štátu, kde je takéto meno obvyklé. Na požiadanie matričného úradu tieto skutočnosti preukazuje rodič dieťaťa potvrdením zastupiteľského úradu cudzieho štátu.
In other words, names may not be "shameful", "non-personal", "home-names/nick-names", same name as a living sibling, wrong-gender names. These restrictions do not apply to a foreign name if it is generally known that such a name is in accordance with the the tradition of the state where it's from. The office can ask the parents to prove the use of the name abroad by confirmation of the embassy of the foreign state.
So:
shameful names would be swear words etc.
non-personal names would be "Video" or "Tatra"
home-names would be "Petko" instead of "Peter"
There is no requirement to use names from a set list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.237.234.184 (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law no. 300/1993, the Law on Names and Surnames 
Talk:Robert Winston, Baron Winston

message: Robert Winston has been presenting a series on the history of the health services in the United Kingdom on BBC Four on Monday nights. 
This article would be updated if it gave information on this series. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Series on BBC Four
Talk:Bot

message: Consider adding balance of trade to this page Rares (talk) 04:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance of trade 

message: Here is a citation from the BLR-CAD website announcing a new release of their 3D-program:
"A new albeit preliminary Bag of Triangles (BoT) editing interface has been developed for Archer and MGED to consolidate and organize the various BoT processing commands into a unified easy-to-use interface."
Somebody might consider adding this BOT-use to the page...
Andre anckaert (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BRL-CAD talks "BoT" 

message: ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't there also  a fish called a  bot?
Talk:Corn and pellet stoves and furnaces

message: The only difference between a corn stove and a pellet stove is in the modifications each manufacturer wants to make to the stove.  Usually just a stirrer and the fact that special venting is reccommended because of the acid content in corn.
But, there are both on the market, which begs the question; do they deserve a separate page?
I'm for transferring the information on this page into a Corn Stove specific site, and making this too general page into a redirected link.  Furnaces and Boilers, should be relegated as a side note in both pages, and I think Pellet stoves (which are the most popular appliances) should be the main hub for all keyword links.
How do other feel about this idea instead of a straight merging?
TheCrippledWerewolf 17:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging Comments

message: This info was pretty general, and basically focused on corn as a fuel, so I recently wrote a more detailed article on Pellet Stoves.  The Title of this page should probably be changed to something more26 specific soon, and hopefully others in the field will help with the edits.
:I also work for a place that sells multiple bio-mass, corn, and pellet heaters.
TheCrippledWerewolf 26 November 2006
>>>I recently wrote a page on corn and pellet stoves and furnaces. I would  welcome any discussion or  inquiries regarding their use etc.
I also reccomend the cornfuel group on Yahoo for further information and inquiries.
:I work for a place that sells corn and pellet stoves, furnaces, and boilers.  I think I'll include a picture in the article. Geekosaurus 00:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pellet Stoves more specifically 

message: Just how attractive are we talking here? 204.69.40.13 14:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Attractive
Talk:Brujah

message: As to the quality scale, I would say this article is a C. It needs to have the references cited (more than one! Clans always have lots of info books!) and to be rewritten in an "out of character" style. 
As to importance, I looked at things like a hierarchy as the article said to do- Vampire: The Masquerade (top), Clans in V:TM (high), Bloodlines in V:TM (Mid). As Brujah is a Clan and in V:TM Clans are crucial to the game, it's high.
--Lamoxlamae (talk) 00:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#Grades standards for articles, for an article to be properly classed as a "C" article, it "should have some references to reliable sources".  This article has none, so shouldn't be categorized as a C-class article.  --Craw-daddy | T | 18:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating scale

message: Now i'm not 100% sure on this, but i thought it was Torreodor that Brujah hated. Actully i am at least 95% sure that it was Toreodor, not Malks....i'll recheck my friends book and get back on this
*****************
okay i looked it up and it is Toreador, Malkavian, and Ventrue
****************************
They dont really care for the Ravanos either if you look at the vtm paperbased book.
--History--
Just wondering where the clan history section comes from.  I've read a hell of a lot of of WoD stuff and I've not seen this.  I'll give it a few months then delete as fan fiction if no one comes forward.  Cameronmurtagh 15:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who hates who?

message: They seem to be the most populous clan worldwide, but also the most popular per sect, Camarilla, Sabbat, Laibon.  Mathiastck 12:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: and this place is quieter then it has any right to be!  There should be at least one bloody rant in this perkele!
Mathiastck (talk) 18:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Populous clan 

message: The "Clans" in Vampire are equivalent to the character classes in Dungeons and Dragons, they are NOT just a story element. As wiki deems fit to allow the character classes of Dungeons and Dragons to have their own articles (Bard (Dungeons & Dragons), etc), there is no reason why the "character classes" of another exceedingly popular pen-and-paper RPG are not notable enough to have their own articles.
In addition, considering the large amounts of background info and game-based info on each of the clans, it is NOT feasible to merge them all into one article. In fact, if we were to do so the resulting article would be too big and then go against Wiki standards.
Please stop listing all Vampire:The Masquerade articles as non-notable.Flygongengar (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The notability flag has been removed.
Petrus4 (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability Explanation and Disagreement about Merging and / or Deletion
Talk:Emmanuel Félix de Wimpffen

message: Where was his birthplace? --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 15:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 