lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:13/14th Dublin

message: I have only just come across this article and the discussion about merging the 13th and 14th Groups. I have no problem about that. Good idea. However there is no mention of the 14th other than what was in the earlier artcile on the 13th. The first line is confusing = "The 13th/14th Dublin unit is a Scout-group ..". Is it now one Group or is it two Groups? It looks like two. I have had a go at correcting this. Am I right? Perhaps someone could then add to the second para where the 14th meet, and correct other stuff that is not clear. --Bduke 23:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Only just noticed the merge of the 2 articles.
Although the 14th was established by members of the 13th the 2 groups are totally different and are in different counties. They have as good as no contact an are completely separate. The only thing they have in common as that they are in Rathfranham, but so are 3 other units (Rathfarnham Girl Guides, Rathfarnham Scouts and Whitechurch Scouts). All 5 units are different though and have a different history.
I'll split it in to 2 different articles again.
Jorgenpfhartogs 04:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help
Talk:Martin Gibbs

message: The A7 tag doesn't really apply, as his importance is asserted in numerous ways: editor-in-chief of Plant Physiology (journal), various positions with other journals, and academic positions that probably meet the propsed Wikipedia:Notability (academics). The only problem is that this looks like it might be a copyvio from Who's Who or something. Ardric47 23:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Surfer's ear

message: IT SHOULD STAY AND BE LINKED TO EXOSTOSIS ONLY BECAUSE THIS IS THE COMMONLY KNOWN TERM FOR THE PROBLEM ESPECIALLY
AMONG SURFERS. JUST LIKE GLOBAL WARMING COULD BE CALLED SOMETHING MORE SCIENTIFIC, MOST PEOPLE LOOKING FOR INFORMATION
ARE GOING TO LOOK FOR THE MORE COMMON NAME.  THIS IS THE NAME USED IN NEWS ARTICLES ON THE TOPIC.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.172.58 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Exostosis? 

message: Does a growth of bone like that ever actually successfully protect the eardrum without rendering it useless? If not, what gives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 01:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A question

message: I have just made some edits to cleanup the article. In particular, I have added medical sources, including one review, and removed prose that read like WP:NOTHOWTO. Darcyisverycute (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup
Talk:Robert Wishart

message: I really do not want to make too much of this, and I have seen from the relevant talk page just how much intellectual energy has been devoted to Margaret's exact title and status; but I think it is a reasonably safe assumption that Wishart-and others- would have continued to act as Guardian even afer her inauguration as queen, considering her age.  The amendment on this point is therefore misleading.  I would have edited accordingly; but having no wish to cause upset or offence will allow this to stand for a day or two for comment.  Thereafter it will stand as justification.
Rcpaterson 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure you're right (unless, speculating, Bek had been appointed Regent by her father-in-law-to-be). Still, Wishart would surely have been on the regency council. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardians and Queens
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Benefiber

message: Yep, I'm tired of debating with people about whether to keep an article on a well-known, nationally advertised product. I have completely verifiable sources such as the company itself, and the Benefiber official website. The article gives a description of the who, what, when, where, and how. Might I mention, the Wikipedia article about Novartis does not even give a mention of the product. Delete it if you want to, it's not worth going through all of this for about 300 words.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yshoulduknow (talk • contribs) .
::I'm sorry you're frustrated. Whether the result of this debate is keep or delete, good luck to you in your future editing endeavors. :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 23:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The company website is NOT a good source. Have you even looked at WP:V?  Teek 23:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OK, Fine
Talk:Princess Ljubica's Residence

message: Changed "countess" to "princess", as Serbian knjeginja is always rendered as "princess", rather than "countess".  also cf. Principality of Serbia. --Konfino (talk) 11:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed the title of the article from "Countess Ljubica's Resience" to "Princess..."
Talk:Carlos Baldomir

message: Both guys cut a lot to make 147 but Gatti was outright infamous for some of his cuts. He supposedly cut more than 20 pounds against Gamache. Gamache was KOed badly and left with brain damage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.118.31 (talk) 22:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't think Gatti is naturally smaller than Baldomir
Talk:Maureen O'Connor (California politician)

message: Favor merger of Maureen O'Connor (California politician) and Maureen O'Connor (former San Diego mayor) Dananderson 23:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Item [5] in the Reference section links to a different article than indicated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.110.98 (talk) 16:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I found a better link for it. --MelanieN (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Error
Talk:Locomotives of the London and North Eastern Railway

message: This page lists GER Class G58 as (LNER Class J17).
However  lists G48 as J17. Which is wrong?
--cfp 23:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The G58 info probably came from here  but I don't know which is correct. Biscuittin (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've  about three classes that are shown as "never built".  has already  from these.
First, the section heading is "Locomotives built by the LNER", these were not built.
Second, the LNER Encyclopedia source states If you work your way through the RCTS Locomotives of the LNER series you will find various proposals under the original class descriptions, with further examples in Part 10A. There are also various proposals described in FAS Brown's biography 'Nigel Gresley - Locomotive Engineer'. Part 10A pages 52-65 describes several other proposals, and 124.190.12.234 seems to have have cherry-picked three of them, with the implication that either (a) there were no other proposals; or (b) these proposals were very much more advanced than any others. The LNER Encyclopedia source also has a blatantly-faked image of a 4-8-2 numbered 2272, which 124.190.12.234 has taken as evidence of an actual loco number. 2272 would not have been used - as shown in Part 10A page 126, this number prior to 1946 was borne by a Q6; and after 1946, by a D40. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed classes
Talk:Three Kingdoms (disambiguation)

message: the three kingdoms wei shu and wu were also used in the popular game dynasty warriors as take place in one of the many soldiers in the wei, shu, and wu kindoms fighting against opposing kingdoms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.176.244 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dynasty Warriors

message: "Taxonomic kingdoms:
    * The animal, vegetable, and mineral kingdoms in Bahya ibn Paquda's classic work, Chovot ha-Levavot ('Duties of the Heart').
    * The modern divisions of life: archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes"
Recommend removal of both entries.
-The first because Taxonomy is a word with very specific meaning, referring to scientific classification, not ancient natural philosophy.
-The second because it's wrong. Each of these are domains, the taxonomic levels above kingdoms. This is highly misleading.
     Ludolud 13:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy
Talk:This Is the Army

message: I can't seem to find an entry for the Broadway musical that this film was made from. Am I missing it, or should I create it? MichaelCaricofe 23:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking this article should be moved to either (film) or (movie), and depending on how much information can be gathered, the (musical) article should be created. Jimcripps 03:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry

message: I would like to know who did the impersonations in the "hamburger" sequence.  It seems like that person ought to be identified where the sequence is mentioned, in the Story section of the article, but he doesn't seem to be.  Can anyone help?  Thanks.
Everything Else Is Taken (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamburger sequence 

message: The "trivia" section includes this item:
:If Washington, D.C. officials did not like the idea of a musical/revue about the Army, playwright Irving Berlin was ready to call it This Is the Navy, or This Is the Air Corps.
I'm inclined to drop this entirely.  Not only is it unsourced, it doesn't make much sense.  "Washington D.C. officials"? Does that mean the mayor?  What relevant authority has he?  The President, on the other hand, commands the Navy as well. Was Irving Berlin locking horns with some official with authority over the Army but not the Army Air Corps?  And what does it mean to be "ready" to rename a creative work? Does that require preparation? 
It sounds like somebody heard a humorous remark and took it literally.  TypoBoy (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody responded to this. It's been nine years. I'm going to take out the bit about the Washington officials and the Navy. TypoBoy (talk) 12:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  trivial
Talk:Chestnut (disambiguation)

message: I believe "chestnut" is also used to refer to an old joke/phrase. But not being a native english speaking person, I won't write it in. Not even wiktionary reflects that fact, so if someone decides to add it here, do add it into wiktionary too. --Tartaros 23:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yup

message: maybe it could be new zealand slang. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blubel (talk • contribs) 20:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  danger 

message: I doubt it but is it worth mentioning Dave Hester? 71.146.10.213 (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible entry
Talk:Maximilian Sforza

message: Then the entire Sforza line was Moorish. His son's would be Moorish. The picture inset feeds into the whitewash.
All across Europe, you seed the same whitewash in history. 41.81.17.141 (talk) 06:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  If Ludovico Sforza was a Moor...?
Talk:2034

message: The 2034 FIFA World Cup will be the 25th edition of the FIFA World Cup. Will this be the last FIFA World Cup taking place since the FIFA World Cup Trophy will retire in 2038? Joseandricardo, 23:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2034 FIFA World Cup]]

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipses
Talk:Goliath tracked mine

message: Can someone please verify that the Goliath is actually the same as the Beetle tank with a citation?  Thanks! Tntdj (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beetle tank 

message: :Goliaths were used most notoriously in the Warsaw Uprising of 1944, as Wehrmacht and SS units were deployed to crush fierce Polish resistance by the Polish Home Army (Armia Krajowa). As the Poles had only a small number of antitank weapons, volunteers were often sent to cut off the command cables of the Goliath before it reached its intended target.
One, I challenge the "most notoriously". Actually I could not find references to this "notorious" use that weren't back-references to this WP article; neither the German nor the English article of the uprising makes any mention of Goliaths. Note that I don't challenge the use of Goliaths in Warsaw, just its "notoriosity" (e.g. when compared to other, heavier weaponry employed), and the amount of weight given to the uprising in the article.
Two, I challenge the necessity, and indeed effectivity, of "antitank weapons" (Bazooka? AT gun?) against a moving target of about 85x60cm. The ideal weapon against a Goliath would probably be an anti-tank rifle...
I'd like to see some sources (other than the "Kanal" dramatic re-enactment), or alternatively recommend cutting back that paragraph to "Goliaths were also deployed against the Polish resistance during the Warsaw Uprising 1944", full stop. -- DevSolar (talk) 11:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warsaw Uprising? 
Talk:Detroit Olympia

message: Does anyone have a free image to use of the actual stadium?  Surely we can do better than a pic of the zamboni? Dp76764 (talk) 20:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I have no idea where to look or who to speak to that with no the concerts that played at Olympia in the 70s. I personally thought I saw the Rolling Stones there but I’m not sure I know I saw them at Cobo Hall. I also thought I saw Stevie Wonder at Olympia again not sure… Can’t imagine why😉
If anyone could help me or put tell me what they remember going to, that would be great! Just taking a walk down memory lane and have very little memory to call upon. Hey, it happens🤷🏼‍♀️glo 2601:40C:4180:3190:D20:DDE5:5389:C917 (talk) 01:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rock and Roll history of Olympia Stadium
Talk:Dogtown (film)

message: The presence of vineyards in the locations used for this film does not necessarily preclude one from imagining it to be set in the Midwest; Missouri is, I believe, the second-largest wine-producing state (certainly in the top five), although most of its vineyards are located closer to the Missouri River than Cuba.Wetzel95 14:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vineyards 

message: , if you are looking to add more to the article, you could add the review from Variety as seen here. Another thing you could do is search for dogtown hickenlooper in Google Books to find relevant results. Also found this that you could include. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback
Talk:Norwegian Star

message: Was the ship in fact "launched" in late 2001, or was that rather her completion or delivery date?  Kablammo 23:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many ships utilize the azipod system, and there have been some well publicized problems with these systems on Celebrity's ships.  Perhaps a discussion could be started on the azipod page.  --OneCyclone 19:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azipod system 

message: What propulsion system does this ship employ?  Ronstew (talk) 01:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propulsion?
Talk:2030

message: The 2030 FIFA World Cup will be th 24th edition of the FIFA World Cup with 100 years after the first one. It might take place in Uruguay just like the first FIFA World Cup, however it is still way too soon for 32 countries to be selected to it. Joseandricardo, 23:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2030 FIFA World Cup]]

message: December 8, 2030 will be the 50th annaversery of Lennon's assosination. I am not sure what is schedualed to happen that day, but it should be put into the article. Zippy117 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if something is now scheduled to happen.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 22:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Death of John Lennon]]

message: I understand that references to the FIFA World Cup's 100th anniversary and possible hosting are pure speculation but the World Cup is scheduled to happen that year so why was that fact on its own removed especially given that the Olympics are still included in the same circumstances? After all it is "something [that] is now scheduled to happen" to quote the criterion laid down by the same user who removed it. Similarly the 2034 contest in mentioned in the page for that year even though nothing is known about it. I really cannot see the problem in just mentioning that the World Cup is scheduled in a section entitled "Predicted and scheduled events" but I really don't want to get into a reversion war over something so trivial so I thought I would bring it here for discussion. Keresaspa (talk) 23:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I lean against keeping it, anyway.  Even future Olympics are not (generally) included until, at least a bid is made.  (If I'm wrong, let me know, and I'll start removing them from year articles.) — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 02:09, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the quick response. I see you've gone to work removing World Cups and Olympics from elsewhere so that'll do for me. As long as there is consistency I'm happy enough.  Keresaspa (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Cup again 

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipses
Talk:Norwegian Sun

message: What propulsion systems does this have? The articles for NCL ships are really vague when it comes to propulsion. --Ragemanchoo (talk) 08:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propulsion? 
Talk:UGC–NET

message: Some links would have been great!
--Anshul 23:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/net.html and http://www.ugc.ac.in/inside/scope.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dpmuk (talk) 14:14, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Addiction medicine

message: This article appears to be more about "doctors of" addiction medicine than about "addiction medicine"... is the article misnamed? Valrith 23:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I named the article because most other medical specialties had entries. The flaw, then, is not with the article name, but with the content itself, which I quickly wrote mostly as a place-holder until I or others could return. I've rewritten the first few lines so as to more precisely describe the material correctly, but this still needs a great deal of work. Drgitlow 04:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article misnamed?
Talk:Stoop ball

message: I have amplified the entry.  There are many reference to this if you google it, including ones to famous people such as marv albert and sandy koufax.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Epeefleche (talk • contribs) 00:04, 24 July 2006
:You've already made your case. Read the hangon template, once you've done that you have to remove it.--Crossmr 00:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is another page, Stair baseball That seems to cover this.  Should we combine the two?  Deceglie (talk) 14:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar Pages

message: Growing up in Philadelphia, we always just called it Step Ball. --141.152.252.164 (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Names

message: Obviously, there is something to this. It even seems to be verifiable. However, it's probably a borderline case, so I will suggest that someone else consider removing the speedy delete tag. Ardric47 00:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: I can understand an AfD nomination but this article most certainly does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Pascal.Tesson 00:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: about speedy

message: Whoever updated this did a fine job.  I'm removing the Wikify and Clean-up templates. LostCause1979 17:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify and cleanup 

message: This is a link to the spalding ball.  Is there anyone with knowledge on the pensie pinkie to create an article and then fix the link?   ThomasHarrisGrantsPass (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  pensie pinkie
Talk:2026

message: The 2026 FIFA World Cup will be the 23rd FIFA World Cup that will have taken place. It may start on May 29, June 5, or June 12, 2026, which means it will end on either June 28, July 5, or July 12, 2026. Joseandricardo, 00:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[2026 FIFA World Cup]]

message: The original edition of this short story was set in 1985. The date was changed for a reprinting. Msr657 07:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: There Will Come Soft Rains, by Ray Bradbury

message: "Red Mars", the story begins on this date. 
It has been said here that the story begins on this date, but no date is specified. Should it be changed to "The story begins in this year", or should a date be found?
Axciom (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eclipses 

message: I have been seeing over the course of the past year a LOT of things that will be happening in 2026. Many of them are the completions of major construction projects, such as the construction of La Sagrada Familia, the world's tallest church, and I'll hopefully have a more complete list later when I have more time, but one important event that I'm pretty sure should be here is the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. AAEexecutive (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other dates 

message: I saw a video from the russian youtuber MyGap and he said something big will happen.He said it may be an apocalypse,but he also said it might be that time might slightly change its tracks. DoraTheMora (talk) 21:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event
Talk:Bumbershoot

message: Per the What Wikipedia is not policy, I have deleted the lengthy list of performers for the 2006 festival.  The WWIN policy states that articles "generally shouldn't list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, schedules etc." as this information will become out of date too quickly.  I have left a brief summary of some artists appearing in 2006. Bookgrrl 00:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know if this is random vandalism/parody, but what is the Insurance Policy about? Is there also an insurance policy called "bumbershoot"? If there is, it should be better clarified. Eptin 02:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insurance Policy? What? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians!
I am going to be updating this page just a bit today including information about AEG Present's role as a producer. I am contributing to Wikipedia as a student and have just completed the training program here. I am sorry in advance if I make an errors as I am still learning. I hope you find my contributions positive additions to the page. 
Kingleothethird (talk) 21:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links Modified