lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tropical Storm Melissa (2007)

message: I gave it start-class, but I think with some work, it could possibly reach B. Juliancolton (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your review. I believe that I have addressed your concerns. If not let me know. Thanks, Juliancolton (Happy St. Patrick's day!) 18:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks! While it might not seem like the most notable storm, it meets the notability guidelines, at least for the WPTC. Juliancolton (Happy St. Patrick's day!) 18:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Just continuing the discussions, I think this should be merged. It's a glorified met. history article. --Hurricanehink (talk) 04:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Angelus (comics)

message: Is it known how and why the Angelus and the Darkness created the Witchblade? Because at the moment this looks like a fairly major plot-hole, so some sort of description would go a long way towards making the story as a whole look better written. Danikat (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, all that has been said in the comics is that the two forces decided to form a truce at some point in their history and the Witchblade is a result of that truce. Nothing more about it has been revealed as of yet. Minity (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Daryl Stephenson

message: Why does it say college and not university under career information? Celynn (talk) 06:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  College? 
Talk:Indian Queens

message: Providing some references and dates of the pub and village may help to clear up the history of the village name.
* sale of goods in December 1805 at the Indian Queens – The Cornish Telegraph, 21 December, 1805, page 1
* Falmouth and Exeter mails fare reduction. Exeter to Indian Queens cost £1 15s – the first time ″the″ is not before Indian Queens (could still refer to the pub) – Royal Cornwall Gazette, 19 May, 1848
* coin found at Indian Queens (donated to the RIC museum – Royal Cornwall Gazette, 12 November 1858, page 6
* report of a child choking ″at the Indian Queen's″ – The Cornishman, 8 April 1880, page 5
Jowaninpensans (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Early references

message: "Krows Karworgi" was in the infobox, but "Myghternes Eyndek" is in the lead. What is the source of Krows Karworgi ?--Johnsoniensis (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:LedgerSMB

message: Noting possible conflicts of interest first.  Yes, I am Chris Travers, and am deeply involved in this open source project (I am one of the founding members and a member of the core team).  I recognize the potential conflict of interest and would like to foster any discussion over other points of view that need to be covered.
My major justification for creating this page is that LedgerSMB is a significant open source accounting program.  We have been covered on Slashdot, LWN, and elsewhere, and given our growth, I think it is important to document the history, controversies, and development of the project in a neutral setting.  Furthermore, I would like to invite people who have different perspectives who would like those to be represented to post them here on the discussion page.  Especially if there are third party sources for any additional controversies, concerns, or issues, I think that those should be mentioned and documented in a neutral way.  Einhverfr (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maker, Cornwall

message: - note that if and when any other article on a subject with the name "Maker" is created, this could always be moved back to Maker, Cornwall and a dab page created.  At the moment, though, there's no reason for this page not to sit at Maker. Neıl ☎ 15:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Support as nominator. —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 20:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Although these edits and others are not vandalism, they do not belong here:
 
Please do not mix articles on a single page. As you can see, there has been a discussion and decision regarding Maker (the Cornish village) residing on this article page. Please be aware of Wikipedia's sister project Wiktionary for dictionary entries, but if you feel that this content belongs in an encyclopedia please consider starting a new article page. Zangar (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits by User [[Special:Contributions/66.7.165.94|User:66.7.165.94]]
Category talk:American executions

message: There are 4 subcategories in this category named "xxxx executions by the United States" (:Category:18th century executions by the United States, :Category:19th century executions by the United States, :Category:20th century executions by the United States, and :Category:21st century executions by the United States). What exactly makes something an "execution by the United States"? I've seen a few articles that had the "xxxx executions by the United States" category that were about sailors (for instance Samuel Cromwell and Elisha Small) who were executed for (plotting) mutiny WITHOUT court-martial. Does that qualify as an execution by the United States? If it's without court-martial, it might be categorised as a lynching (:Category: Extrajudicial killings) instead... wjmt (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Executions by the United States
Talk:European potato failure

message: GREAT! This article needed to be done.  Would like to see also why the potato became so important a crop in Europe, thus explaining why its loss was so devastating. Stepp-Wulf (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Talk

message: Is this statement really true? - 'The effect of the crisis on Ireland is incomparable to all other places'
Whilst Ireland was definitely the worst hit country, did the Scottish Highland not suffer a larger population decline as % of their population? 1.7 million left the region and the region is still today one of the most underpopulated areas in Western Europe. There is less than 0.5 million people in the Scottish Highlands and islands today and a huge % of those people are English and lowland Scots. Compare that to how Ireland (eventually) bounced back. The Highland famine effectively ended an entire people and way of life, as horrific as the Irish famine was the same can't be said to the same extent.
So can we change that statement to something like 'Ireland was the worst famine hit country'? Or even have a reference to the devastating effect the famine had on the Gaelic regions of Ireland AND Scotland. Cheers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.171.81 (talk) 12:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Scotland and Ireland

message: The article gives the idea that the total population of Scotland should have decreased, but according to the decennial census figures at Demography of Scotland, that's not true... AnonMoos (talk) 21:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Scotland again

message: Ireland pre famine 2.1 kg/capita daily. That is alot of potatos!  This cant be right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtpaley (talk • contribs) 21:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Daily consumption

message: I have just corrected 2 massive errors in this article. Firstly the idea that a million Highlanders emigrated from Scotland to escape the famine. The total population of the Highlands has never been much more than 300,000 and, at the peak of the famine, only about 200,000 people were at risk.
Secondly the Scottish/Highland diaspora was going on long before the potato famine and more Scots and Highlanders left their country of birth in the period between the end of the famine and the start of the Great Depression - with higher numbers in years towards the end of that period.
I find it alarming that such absolute nonsense should have existed in Wikipedia since 28 November 2007.  I think the Wikipedia community should hang their heads in shame over this one. What else is wrong with this article??
References for the above include:
Lynch, Michael (1991). Scotland, a New History (1992 ed.). London: Pimlico. ISBN 9780712698931.
Devine, T M (1995). The Great Highland Famine: Hunger, Emigration and the Scottish Highlands in the Nineteenth Century. Edinburgh: Birlinn Limited. ISBN 1 904607 42 X.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 corrections
Talk:Lookout Mountain Air Force Station

message: It's unclear whether the films listed are those made there, or external films made on that facility. Sloppy work. --Jerome Potts (talk) 22:35, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film section 

message: The list of films included mostly films made in the 1990s and 2000s.  How is this possible if the factility closed in 1969 as the narrative and infobox state?  Also removed WWII TF because article indicates station opened post war.--Lineagegeek (talk) 23:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Although it is my opinion, it might be that a lot of the films produced by units at this former military base, were not declassified until the Clinton Administration, causing their "publishing" into the public arena to come after their declassification.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

text: The article also says that it was not a Moon studio, but a desert studio, to film Vietnam in. Yeah, the Vietnam desert? What? Where? 79.106.203.100 (talk) 12:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistencies

message: See [] from a veteran. Please integrate this as you see fit. Guy (Help!) 23:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some great new content 

message: I am an idiot: I posted this to the MilHist wikiproject but forgot to link it here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lookout_Mountain_Air_Force_Station is text submitted to OTRS by a veteran who does not have Wikipedia skills. It's personal recollections and not referenced so can't be used directly, but there's a lot of good background and anyone who'd like to improve the article could probably find sources if they looked. Please make our reader's day :-) Guy (Help!) 09:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form the MilHist Wikiproject page 

message: The new draft has been stable for a while and represents a significant improvement in content, so I have moved it in and merged the histories. Guy (Help!) 12:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft moved in 

message: The first section reads:
"there was an obvious need to document nuclear testing with still and moving pictures photography."
The author and I might think so in hindsight, but surely this line should say "there was a desire to document", and the article should state by who.
04:48, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Obvious need to document" 

message: Apparently, IMDB has quite a long list https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?companies=co0041219 of films made "With Lookout Mountain Films" after 1969, including "The Empire Strikes Back" and "Return of the Jedi".  Anyone know what that's all about?  Was the studio privately operated after the Air Force left?  Or maybe they mean with footage taken by the Lookout Mountain studio while it was still running?  Maybe an edit to explain what that's about would be useful.  Wombat140 (talk) 14:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lookout Mountain Films" after 1969?
Talk:Chess World Cup 2007

message: I changed Xu Yuhua from WGM to GM. Her FIDE report card contradicts itself by calling her a "Woman Grand Master (GM)". This is true of a number of women on the top 50 women's list from October, and they all have the g in their title column on that list. Xu also has the g on the search results page, but for some reason is not on the top 50 list (where she should be around 7th). It's all very confusing, but I think it's safe to assume that she is a GM, in the light of the fact that FIDE traditionally bestows the title upon all Women's World Champions. -- Jao (talk) 16:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed Xu's title

message: This article has been subject to a review within the WikiProject Chess in order to assess whether quality could be assessed as A-class. The review began on 21st February 2008 and ended on 11th March 2008. The discussion is reproduced hereafter so that editors can find hints on how to improve the article. The original discussion can also be consulted here.
You can see the archived discussion hereunder: SyG (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Review for A-class
Talk:Stony Hill Vineyard

message: Much of the initial content was created by User:StonyHill, which appears to be a single-purpose account and presents a conflict of interest problem related to the content of this article.  I am of the opinion that the content is salvageable and have begun work on revisions to eliminate potential conflict of interest issues.  If you have specific concerns about COI in this article, please don't hesitate to alter the article, but it would be useful for you to express your concerns here as well.  Regards --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest
Talk:List of Polish armoured fighting vehicles

message: As I understand it the Polish divisions in Italy(and PAIFORCE)and the Armoured division in UK and NW Europe were equipped to British scales.  This means there were lots of Carriers in various roles and configurations. There were probably M10 antitank guns as well.  
In addition the Armd div would have had ACVs and SP guns, probably M7 Priest until replaced with 25-pr Sexton.Nfe (talk) 01:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing AFVs
Talk:Tonight (Westlife song)

message: It has been suggested that this article be split into articles titled Tonight (Westlife song) and Miss You Nights, accessible from a disambiguation page. I am totally for the idea as even Westlife released the two songs separately in many other countries except the UK. In any case "Miss You Nights" is not originally by Westlife but by Cliff Richard, and the Wikipedia conventionally would put cover versions as a secondary entry to the main page. Since Miss You Nights has been created, it should be shifted there. Today can be put on Tonight (Westlife song) page werldwayd (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting the article
Talk:Emmett O'Donnell Jr.

message: Any info on the origin of the nickname?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.102.65.10 (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Anoka High School

message: Greeting editors!
Before adding or re-adding any content to this article, allow me to make some big suggestions based on some past experience I have had:
1.  Go visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools to get a feel for what Wikipedia is looking for in articles about schools.  There are a great many things that you can research and include, but there are many things that you may passionately feel are important, and simply don't belong in an encyclopedia article.  Remember, this is not your school's homepage ... it is an encyclopedia article about your school.
2.  Specifically check out:  What not to include.  This section outlines things that, even if you think they are important, will likely get deleted eventually, and would likely not hold up if the article gets sent to arbitration.  Among the things not to include are events of short term importance like who caught a winning touchdown, how far the team made it in the basketball playoffs (unless it was like a top 4 finish or something like that), the names of coaches or teachers (unless they are otherwise notable), this year's spring musical, etc, etc.  These are all either unencyclopedic, or are matters of short term interest.
3.  Consider having this article assessed by either the folks at WikiProject Schools, or at Wikipedia:WikiProject Minnesota.  they can be reached by the big links at the top of this Talk Page.  People associated with the project will assess the article, and will give suggestions for improvement.  This may help more specifically guide editors as to what needs to be added and what needs to be removed.
Best of luck!  LonelyBeacon 03:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What NOT to include in this article (and what TO include)
Talk:Mona Lisa (Nat King Cole song)

message: The current version of the article has the song length as 3:27.  This caught my eye as the version I have is 3:12 (and is not truncated).  There are several different lengths reported at usually-reliable sites or actual label images:
*  has the 1950 US Capitol 1010 78 with the length explicitly as 2:25 on the label.
* This LP, Capitol 1010 (1950), is stated to be 3:12 though the length can't be seen in the image.  (It's unusual for an LP and 78 to have the same catalogue number so I'm skeptical).
*  has 3:12 on the label, also for the 1950 US Capitol 1010 78.
Most interesting is this link (from ) that has the time on the label as 3:26, one second shorter than the 3:27 currently on the article page.  The catalogue number is Capitol X-6003.  It is a US release.  The label states "Originally released: May 1950".
It would appear that the original release has a length of 3:12 and an early reissue, possibly 1952, has a length of 3:26.  (The "possibly 1952" is from a link I can't find again after Firefox crashed while I was researching...).  I'll guess the first link with a length of 2:25 is a misprint.  This was common enough to be plausible but I have no authoritative reference for this.  I wonder if the "3:27" in the current article is round off/error from the original editor's CD or MP3 player.
I have tried to "be bold with my edits" when I have had sufficient backing data but I do not have such data here.  I hope someone with more information can address this or inform me and I'll make any necessary changes.
--
After more research, it looks like the original 1950 version is 3:12.  The re-recording on The Nat King Cole Story is 3:27.  If this is correct, both lengths should probably be listed in the info box.
Can anyone confirm my findings?
Wantnot (talk) 11:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct track length - 3:27?, 3:12?, ??
Talk:Nissan Gloria

message: Photos of this car are desperately needed, other than taxis. Now that this car is no longer made, older vehicles must be running around in Japan.(Regushee (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There appear to be differences between the 'generations' identified in this article and the Nissan Cedric. Someone needs to sort out if this really is an issue. - Peter Ellis - Talk 04:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Generations

message: Actually, "gloria" is the italian word for "glory".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.50.149.100 (talk) 12:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gloria is an italian word 

message: someone please explain that design feature on the earlier models. thanks. Cramyourspam (talk) 15:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  fender-mounted side mirrors
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/L.E.K. Consulting

message: Google News Archive search:
*http://news.google.com/archivesearch?client=safari&rls=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22L.E.K.+Consulting%22
In retrospect, this company may be notable even if the articles about it have been spammed. --A. B. (talk)  02:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Richmond railway line

message: Any chance of getting the Kurrajong extension added to the diagram? Obviously, it is closed and would be in pale, but it is relevant to the history of the line. I'd add it but I'm not sure of locations of bridges, roads, stations, etc.. --Athol Mullen (talk) 02:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kurrajong extension
Talk:Steamroller Blues

message: A recent edit changed the quoted lyrics from " 'bout to roll all over you" to "I'm bound to roll all over you". Now, an internet lyric search has found plenty of copies of both forms, plus some other text besides! Which is the correct lyric?
On YouTube you can view several clips of James Taylor performing the song. In the ones I listened to, it sounded more like " 'bout to...", but in an Elvis version , it sounded more like "...bound to..."
So, which is it?
EdJogg (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd have to find the published sheet music to get a definitive answer, I think.  JT invariably gets silly when performing the song, so twists on the lyric are always possible.  Wasted Time R (talk) 01:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First line...?
Talk:Anne Ryan

message: I've started researching Anne Ryan and intend to update this page. Please let me know if you have any additional resources you'd like considered. Suggestions welcome! SojoQ (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Page 

message: Unsourced CV items moved off main space. Return only with citations. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced CV items moved off main space
Talk:1983 Pittsburgh Steelers season

message: This is plagiarized from Steelers.com: http://www.steelers.com/news/article-1/It-all-falls-apart-in-LA/8049826f-3aad-463f-b01e-517738bd375e  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.183.50.179 (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly was, I have just removed it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nburden

message: User:Nburden
    run at Thu Nov 29 02:30:15 2007 GMT
Category:              3
Image:                 4
Mainspace              2027
Portal:                1
Talk:                  39
Template:              1
User talk:             1084
User:                  46
Wikipedia talk:        3
Wikipedia:             132
avg edits per page     1.18
earliest               01:37, 22 December 2006
number of unique pages 2829
total                  3340
2006/12  7
2007/1   0
2007/2   0
2007/3   0
2007/4   0
2007/5   9
2007/6   12
2007/7   20
2007/8   10
2007/9   42
2007/10  1537
2007/11  1703
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
                 Mainspace
19 Eastern Michigan University
11 Tobacco smoking
11 Learning disability
10 Michigan State University
9  National Forensic Association
8  Bomber Raid
8  SSG550 Sniper
8  Naruto: Ultimate Ninja (series)
8  Gun laws in the United States (by state)
7  Powers Catholic High School
6  Coffin and Keys
6  Heckler & Koch USP
5  The Darwin Awards (film)
5  Wolverine World Wide
5  Portal (video game)
             Talk:
11 Eastern Michigan University
3  Powers Catholic High School
3  U.B. Funkeys
2  Quintessence films
2  Main Page
2  Eastern Michigan Eagles
2  Smoking
       Image:
2 Bomber raid 2m.jpg
         User:
17 Nburden/monobook.js
16 Nburden
2  Kukuciao7
      User talk:
48 Nburden
15 203.220.13.239
4  71.68.248.141
4  168.216.88.5
4  68.98.167.71
4  134.219.176.84
4  68.255.191.157
3  Synoptica
3  129.67.144.68
3  61.246.33.169
3  70.90.106.1
3  98.132.50.101
3  DerHexer/archive06
3  76.164.193.90
3  129.237.44.52
                  Wikipedia:
61 Administrator intervention against vandalism
5  Abuse reports/63.88.33.254
5  Requests for page protection
4  Abuse reports
3  Requests for adminship/Nburden
2  Abuse reports/141.150.53.30
2  WikiProject Firearms/to do
2  Abuse reports/70.227.27.29
2  Abuse reports/216.205.224.10
2  Main Page/Errors
2  Basic navigation
         Wikipedia talk:
2 WikiProject User scripts/Scripts
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 02:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Nburden