lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Svayambhu

message: Some murthis, but certainly not all, are considered Swayambhu.  --BostonMA talk 21:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swayambhu Murthis 

message: --Svayam Vyakta Ksetras--
According to the Sri Vaisnava sect of Hinduism, there are eight Svayam Vyakta Ksetras or temples containing Swayambhu murthis. These are:
* Lord Ranganatha at Srirangam
* Lord Venkateswara at Thirumala also known as Venkatadri
* Lord Badrinarayan at Badrinath
* Lord Bhuvaraha at Sri Mushnam 
* Lord Devarajan at Naimisaranya
* Lord Totadri Naadhan at Thirunelveli
* Lord ParamaPurusha at Pushkar
* Lord Muktinath at Muktinath
This material may be returned when Wikipedia's non negotiable policy of WP:V with WP:RS using WP:CITE is followed. Referencing other Wikipedia articles does not fulfill this requirement. Also, linking to articles that don't provide relevant information to topic of article is heavily discouraged, as are an abundance of red links. Feature Article evaluators are against a user having to click  more than once for adequate, sourced information. This article is a link for Hoysala architecture going for Feature Article review within the next few days or so. Sorry.  Thanks! --Mattisse 15:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  putting unsourced material from main page here 

message: Isn't there a stupa, too? Swayambhunath, Swayambunath, Kathmandu, Svayambhu Stupa, , , .
:Austerlitz -- 88.75.194.32 (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Stupa]] 

message: Listen to translations of same words. Analyze length of translations! 67.166.222.175 (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marathi (peopled) Language vs. Sanskrit (high class) language or simple. 

message: I have changed the title of this article and replaced all mentions of Swayambhu to Svayambhu, since the term is transliterated as Svayambhū in Sanskrit. This is also consistent with the spellings of the root word in the articles of Svayamvara and Svayam Bhagavan. Chronikhiles (talk) 12:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction of Swayambhu to Svayambhu
Talk:Arkham House: The First 20 Years

message: I've merged this sentence into the Arkham House article. There's no evidence this one book is notable enough for its own write-up. As only one sentence it can easily fit into the Arkham House article as an intro to the (over-)extensive bibliography. Sionk (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Gregory V of Constantinople

message: It would be wise that instead of continuing to revert, editors involved in this edit war read the corresponding reference (the book is online). The ip is only restoring the last stable version containing the info present in the book (text plus note nr. 43 at p. 17). If there are other interpretations of this fact (with sources) feel free to insert them in the article, but consider that changing the referenced text of an article in a way that is not conform to the reference is considered disruptive editing. The correct way to solve the problem is to discuss here the issue, leaving the last stable version in place until consensus has been reached. Alex2006 (talk) 08:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war on this page about patriarch's death 

message: This article jumps from his first election as patriarch to his death, with no information about what he did in between, or why he was patriarch three times. Is there really nothing to report? I doubt it. Richard75 (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. He was removed twice for political reasons but I didn't have time when I last edited the page to add that in there. Xenophore; talk 17:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omission of almost his entire career 

message: Wikipedia lists Gregory's cause of death as "Suicide" in fastfacts that heads the article. This is manifestly unhistorical and probably malicious. I asked Wikipedia to correct this gross mischaracterization 10 days ago but they have taken no action. How can I escalate this matter? Polambda (talk) 00:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim Gregory Commited Suicide
Talk:Big Ten Academic Alliance

message: From a factual standpoint, is it correct to say the CIC is composed of 12 or 13 members?  Really, this comes down to asking if UIC and UIUC are separate institutions. --Cumulant 18:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The CIC commercial that airs on the Big Ten Network lists 12 institutions, possibly assuming that UIUC and UIC are considered branches of the same university system.  I don't think there's much mention of Illinois-Chicago on the website either, but my guess is that they are still considered part of the University of Illinois system. 24.140.36.207 (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with you.  Illinois-Chicago is part of the entire University of Illinois system and their campus gets used for events from what I hear, but they're still like UIUC in terms of being branches.  Frank12 (talk) 02:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the page since the CIC site lists governance by thirteen provosts.  If membership were by university system, then UIC and UIUC would share one vote -- instead of each having their own vote.--Cumulant (talk) 04:19, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See below--Cumulant (talk) 20:20, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Gerald Kersh

message: I think this is a pic of kersh here
http://www.librarything.com/authorpics/kershgerald-492a19dd14222.jpg
anyone want to confirm and put it up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.201.178 (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is from the NYPL Digital Gallery image of a dust jacket. The NYPL's terms for the site are not compatible with our CC/GFDL license, and anyway, the image's copyright almost certainly belongs either to the photography studio (Carlyle Studios) that created it or to the publishing company (Simon and Schuster) for which it was presumably created. Therefore, it could be uploaded here only if a case could be made that it satisfies the non-free content criteria, and I, for one, am not prepared to assert that it does. Deor (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph
Talk:H (New York City Subway service)

message: As this article is expanded on as part of the Rockaway Park Shuttle article, it is proposed that this H (New York City Subway service) article be merged with the afore-mentioned article. STrRedWolf (talk) 02:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment. This page has been planned as a disambig page (because the letter H may mean both an internal designation for the S and the current temporary replacement for a part of the A). I don't think it's a good idea to convert this disambig to an article. All this info already exists in other articles. Vcohen (talk) 09:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion
Talk:Grand Street Shuttle

message: According to a YouTube video, the former Grand Street Shuttle is back, and as an Orange "S" train (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr2jV4oRdEM&list=UUYOSc6km_g9drGiV77bTwmQ&index=6). ---------User:DanTD (talk)  02:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidently, it's back
Talk:Digital fabricator

message: OK to add this link regarding notability?  http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn10922-desktop-fabricator-may-kickstart-home-revolution.html Selkins 21:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do. No need to ask. "Edit boldly" is the mantra at WP.  Paul Beardsell 21:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I've moved the page from Fabber to the name the article said this was a shortening of, and rewritten to match. The AfD appeared to note that the page should be moved; if anyone notices any errors I've introduced, please fix. Cheers, DWaterson 21:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page moved

message: DreamGuy, did you want to discuss your reasons for the merge, and ideas about which page should be kept?  --GargoyleMT 16:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reasons for the merge tag is that people have created multiple pages on the exact same topic under different names and which would be better to have all the info in one place instead of small amounts of info spread out and being edited separately. I don't particularly care which one is kept, as long as we're edit that one, then later on if someone has a reason for one name over another it can be moved if necessary. DreamGuy 17:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This merge sounds good to me.  Of :Digital fabricator and :Desktop manufacturing, I think the latter name should be kept (since it is not a neologism like "fabber"), though this article has more meat (and edit history) in it.  Among the rapid prototyping themed pages, there are other similar ones (rapid manufacturing) that might collapse well to a single article.  Most are pages about future developments, since the materials of prototyping aren't very close in function to production materials.  --GargoyleMT 19:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that, in general, there are probably too many articles on this subject. However, I think there may be value in keeping the apparatus separate from the overall process. If you consider that :Computer printer and :Desktop Publishing are appropriately separate, this case may be similar.  --Ymalaika 21:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Although many kinds of fabricators might fit on a desktop, not all of them do, such as the Candyfab, so I feel the distinction is useful. Milkfish 20:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Hubbard, Ohio

message: This 20/20 was so sui generis that I thought the Hubbard entry would be remiss if Wikipedia didn't give at least an overview of it.  After viewing the 20/20 report twice, I STILL don't understand what it really at root in this dispute--specifically, why the fellow who owned the property so resented his eventual neighbor of buying the house when it was in probate--but the story is so unusual that it truly puts Hubbard on the map.  Whether or not Hubbardites like that.  (And I suspect that, by and large, they don't.)  [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:3:1000:4E2:9227:E4FF:FEF0:BBDE (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a brief recap of the May 2014 report on 20/20 regarding car honking 
Talk:Estragon

message: estragon;an herb,vegatable,plant or spice of some kind?
:Tarragon in English. --Yossarian 30px| 22:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

message: i don't know anything about this subject and came here to inquire.  however, upon reading it i am still unsure if this is a book, a play, a movie, an opera ?  perhaps that qualifier could be added to the intro.Newtonsghost (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  more info?
Talk:Leonard Feather

message: Leonard Feather taught a class, "The History of Jazz" at the University of California, Riverside, in 1973.  One of his guest performers was Eubie Blake, who performed a song he had written in 1899.  The class was so popular that it was held in the campus' main auditorium.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.22.88 (talk) 11:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Class
Talk:Medicine Lodge Treaty

message: Ten Bears address is moving, considering the circumstances, but perhaps having such a lengthy quotation from him is giving undue weight to one element of the complex issues of the treaties, settlers and American Indians.  Also, editors are supposed to be relying on valid third-party sources, not on OR pulling together primary quotes.--Parkwells (talk) 20:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue weight?
Talk:Joralemon Street Tunnel

message: This page says that the tunnel was flooded during Hurricane Sandy, but does not provide a detailed source. This article, Could New York City Subways Survive Another Hurricane? indicates that the tunnel did not flood.
170.28.136.41 (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Montague Street Tunnel

message: This article should probably acknowledge its role as an alternate route for the BMT into Manhattan when the Manhattan Bridge tracks are out. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Kew Gardens 613, I think so as well. I can get to that later, probably if I rewrite this article, but a rewrite isn't high on my current list of priorities. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I know-I was just pointing it out in light of some recent edits of yours. I will try to get back to the draft Manhattan Bridge closures article this summer, if I can. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:39, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manhattan Bridge closures
Talk:Tubby Smith

message: Question: How can Tubby have joined the elite group to reach 365 wins in 15 years or less in 2005 and yet entered the 2007 with 365 wins?  Think some editing need be done!
:Done --W.marsh 13:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please don't add that he is Texas Tech's new head coach until the Texas Tech athletic department actually confirms it. The Tech AD spokesman has denied it. Falcon8765 (TALK) 21:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas Tech 
Talk:Dual Contracts

message: See also /Tri-borough system notes
===Planning of the lines===
*March-May 1905: plans adopted for many lines including Manhattan Bridge, Lafayette Avenue, and Fourth Avenue
*April-October 1905: Brooklyn IRT redesigned with provisions for Manhattan Bridge, Lafayette Avenue, and Fourth Avenue
*1907-1908: Fourth Avenue Line moved from Flatbush Avenue to Ashland Place to allow for non-IRT operation; junction included for Lafayette Avenue
*May 1908: Brooklyn IRT opens
*November 1909: ground broken for the Fourth Avenue/Manhattan Bridge Line in Flatbush Avenue Extension
*March 1911: possibly the first proposal to use the junction for the Brighton Line
--NE2 02:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: *March-May 1905: plans adopted for many lines including Manhattan Bridge, Lafayette Avenue, and Fourth Avenue
*April-October 1905: Brooklyn IRT redesigned with provisions for Manhattan Bridge, Lafayette Avenue, and Fourth Avenue
*1907-1908: Fourth Avenue Line moved from Flatbush Avenue to Ashland Place to allow for non-IRT operation; junction included for Lafayette Avenue
*May 1908: Brooklyn IRT opens
*November 1909: ground broken for the Fourth Avenue/Manhattan Bridge Line in Flatbush Avenue Extension
*March 1911: possibly the first proposal to use the junction for the Brighton Line
--NE2 02:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Planning of the lines
Talk:IRT Third Avenue Line

message: What does headway mean in these sentences: The route still mimics a subway line headway and employs articulated buses. While no night service is provided, the Bx15, a local complement of the Bx55, runs every 20 minutes, a standard subway headway for late nights.  Sounds like some kind of railfan jargon which most people won't understand. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Headway is the time between trains. I'll add a link in the text to that article. --NE2 02:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headway? 

message: What happened before the IRT got it? Who built it? When ? Always electric ? DCDuring 00:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: This should be mentioned.  One question people ask is, there's a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and (until 2006) a 9 train.  What was the 8 train?  This was it. 64.105.124.2 20:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; I added a link to 8 (New York City Subway service). --NE2 00:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was the 8 train 

message: I'm a little concerned about aspects of the tone of this section, which in crucial spots take the position that the El was hastily torn down to benefit real estate interests. Now it so happens I agree with that, but I think that we need sourcing and that needs to be attributed and worded in a more balanced fashion. I won't give it an "npov tag" right now, but I wanted to raise the issue for the moment. Meanwhile I'm going to see what I can find in terms of sourcing. ScottyBerg (talk) 01:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of History section

message: Am I mistaken or does a new article on the MTA website read a lot like this article, especially a the beginning? ScottyBerg (talk) 18:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Great minds think alike

message: Generally in any article about traction, there is at least a link for readers interested in the type of equipment that operated on it. But not here. In contrast, the Market Street Railway article on wikipedia leads off with equipment, and gives the final resting place of every car that is known to survive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_Street_Railway_%28transit_operator%29
Please add a link to an article, or discuss equipment in at least a "stub-class" way. 50.0.36.140 (talk) 04:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Stock? 

message: According to , this belonged to the Third Avenue Railway. It should be removed from this article. Right? Vzeebjtf (talk) 20:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Vzeebjtf (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Avenue Car Barn (image)
Talk:IRT Sixth Avenue Line

message: The Sixth Avenue structure was made of iron, not steel. Until the 1880s steel prices were too high for it to be a practical material in the amounts needed to build large bridges or elevated railways. The only Sixth Avenue El steel was the rails, and the IRT had a practice of reusing former mainline rails in yards, so the rails may have been lifted before sale of the structure. In fact demo photos I've seen do not show any rails being removed. JoeBrennan (talk) 22:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrap iron
Talk:Bell Pogo

message: I added some links.92.21.168.199 (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

message: When did Bell start on this for NASA, and when did the US Army/DARPA get involved ? - Rod57 (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History / NASA / US military
Talk:IND World's Fair Line

message: I agree that maps are needed for this article. At a minimum the maps needed should include:
* The location of the station
* What track changes were made
* Signalling Details
Graham1973 (talk) 12:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1939 map shows the station location if you pan to the right. -------User:DanTD (talk)  03:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Map suggestions

message: The last sentence of the article reads "The seven grade time signals still exist today." This needs to be clarified, does it mean  the signals still in operational use or does it simply mean that the signals while inactive have not been removed from the locations they were placed? Graham1973 (talk) 12:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification of last sentence needed
Talk:Commonwealth v. Hunt

message: This case isn't on the list of Supreme Court cases, and it's important enough to warrant being merged into that article as well.
List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_from_the_Jay_Court_through_the_Taft_Court —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.180.107.198 (talk) 01:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not on list of Supreme Court Cases

message: This was a decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Court.  Chamberlian (talk) 00:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass. Sup. Court
Talk:William Swann

message: I included myself as an American Psycholgist because I believe that my record warrants it. For example, in a 1995 poll, I was ranked 35th of the 50 most cited psychologists in the world. In a 1999 poll, I was ranked 22nd most cited researcher in the Annual Review of Psychology. In a 2002 survey, i was included in list of most cited contributors to the major Handbooks of Social Psychology. In a 2004 survey of authors published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I was among the 30 most cited. In a 2006 survey in Dialogue, I was among the top 30 of most cited authors in Social Psychology textbooks. My current citation count is over 5,000. Wbswann 22:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Having spent a long time searching for sources for this article, I've come to the conclusion that, 1) Swann comfortably meets Criterion 1 of WP:ACADEMIC. His research attracts very many citations, and is a staple of many textbooks in social psychology. 2) While there are lots of sources about his research contributions such as self-verification, there is a distinct lack of biographical information about him. I conclude that the article belongs here, but for now the biographical information needs to come from his own site and CV. Hopefully in the long run there will be third-party biographical sources. MartinPoulter (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of William Swann
Talk:Causticity

message: I have a law enforcement canine and would like to prepare an emergency kit for accidental overdoses.  I would like to know which illegal drugs are caustic for so my veterinarian can help with preparing the kit.
i think the merge with corrosiveness is a good idea, with the title 'corrosive and caustic', subheadings for each one and a final subheading explain the differences and relationships  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.17.158 (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Total Distortion

message: The sleeping part to this article is wrong.
When you sleep there is a minigame where you have to shoot  the nightmares so they won't go to your brain. If you shoot them and let a dream game come into your brain you have this mini-game you play to get more mental health and energy. If you fail You won't die. If you have a nightmare you will not die as well.Darkside2000 08:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections 

message: I ill completely redo this article. I have the game
so i will add more info and fix the rest.Darkside2000 (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Cleanup 

message: *
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970713184543/http://www.newmedia.com:80/NewMedia/96/03/screens/TotalDistortion.html
*https://archive.org/stream/CGStrategyPlus_assorted/CG-StrategyPlus-63#page/n71/mode/2up
JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Kompas Gramedia Group

message: Needs references, and headings. I don't know enough about the subject to know where to begin Challenger78 (talk) 12:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Gramedia Pustaka Utama is a subsidiary of the Kompas Gramedia Group, so the current title should be fine as it stands. --Bxj (talk) 13:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gramedia Pustaka Utama 
Talk:Sečovce

message: Greetings from Maryland, in the United States.  My grandfather (also named David Roth), was born in this town in Slovakia in 1906.  I was curious if anyone else who visits this page was either related to him, or has/had relatives that may have known him back in the 1910's-1940's.  Before WW II, he apparently started a family, with the children named Alfred and Kathy.  He lost his first family tragically in the Holocaust, and started a new one after the war with my grandmother.  This branch of the family has lived in the United States since 1950.  Thegreatdr 22:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Roth family history in this town of Slovakia
Talk:Hydration

message: WHAT ELSE WILL ALCOHOL DO???
Connor456 22:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Hydrationa Hiya sagar (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grography 

message: Someone needs to put up a good article on these practices now appearing all over the United States. Are they pseudoscience? Are they beneficial? Are they a scam? For pity's sakes, they're using IV drips - what kind of license is required to run one of these shops? Are they recommended by the medical community? Mentummike (talk) 03:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  HYDRATION THERAPY, HYDRATION SPAS