lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:East Asian Jews

message: The material for this article was placed here from :Category:East Asian Jewry, see  rather than as a  lengthy introduction over there. IZAK 09:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: I am not sure whether or not Judaism is illegal or ever was illegal in China or Japan. However I think that someone would do well to expand on the subject. *hint hint* I will try to get around to researching it also. Thanks a bunch!--Coffeegirlyme (talk) 08:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judaism Legal in China?
Talk:Liga Sudamericana de Baloncesto

message: On Argentine clubs, Olimpia is from Venado Tuerno, and has nothing to do with the one from Bahia Blanca; Estudiantes is from Olavarria, also not related to the team from La Plata. Great job, Carioca! Planning to do the South American Club Championship as well? Mariano(t/c) 09:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for your help. I created the South American Club Championship article, and also the McDonald's Championship article. Regards, --Carioca 04:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done! Take care, Mariano(t/c) 08:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Small thing
Talk:Rho, Lombardy

message: Ci starebbe una sezione sui siti e monumenti, tipo il Santuario etc.
Ne ha parecchi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.58.59.83 (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

message: The reported image appers to be wrong. It is different from the one reported on the Italian wiki and on the official site.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.225.237.106 (talk) 17:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arm

message: The arms depicted on this page are still incorrect. Not only are they outdated, they are in fact the version used during the fascist era (notice the chief containing the fasces). The town currently uses just the wheel.
--Avenflight (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of Arms update
Talk:Baba Tahir

message: FYI, Baba Taher was follower of Yarsan that is the religion of Guran and Lak kurds. I don't know how do you say that his poets are in Kelhuri!!! His poems are cited in Gurani, laki Kurdish, and Luri and Persian!--Lekistan (talk) 13:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gurani and Leki not Kelhuri!!!!! 

message: ::Removed two non-RS sources.. Thank you--96.255.251.165 (talk) 03:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of fringe stuff were removed..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.251.165 (talk) 04:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The only one there I can say might be ok is the Kurdish Academy of Languages, but I'm not sure about that one either. We seem to use it quite a bit as people from there are editing here. Dougweller (talk) 07:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Of course, Iranica always has the best. He can be Persian but not Kurd (: There was a table of words from poems of Baba Tahir, why did you delete it? People could see the similarity of Baba Tahir's language with Persian and Kurdish. If you have problem about pronaunciation. You could correct it, not delete!--Gomada (talk) 22:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Eshmerdan and biri and bire are exist in Kurdish dialect and languages too. So what? Is this a reason to delete table? By the way, the Baba Tahir's poems are understandable in Kurdish languages. But there is no claim. He is an important person for Yarsan Kurds and when you know Yarsan culture, they have a story about Baba Tahir :"Last night I was a Kurd and this morning I have become an Arab." We cant deny people's culture.--Gomada (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Dear IP-person, i dont understand.You just try to improve that, his poems are understandable in Persian too. Ok, who is againist that? Thats normal, these are iranian languages. So, there will be always connection. You have already written that, his poetry is Persian. Where is the mention for Kurdish? if you are so neutral. Why dont i still see any mention about Kurdish in his article?--Gomada (talk) 13:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can discern no one knows exactly how to classify his poetry exactly.  However, based on the article Kurdish literature in Encyclopaedia Iranica, I do not see any mention of Baba Tahir.  Please add any RS source though..I am not against RS sources.--108.18.145.11 (talk) 03:10, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: *Iranica
*Britannica --Wario-Man (talk) 00:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 2
Talk:Prohibitory traffic sign

message: There is a section here about speed limit signs, which I find odd, given that a speed limit sign is no more prohibitory than a stop sign. Lupinelawyer (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed limit is regulatory not prohibitory 

message: I have been through a few articles, namely Double Yellow Lines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_yellow_line and Pennant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennant which reference this prohibitory traffic signal. Something like:
A "No Passing Zone" is a stretch of road in which it is deemed to be unsafe to attempt to cross the double yellow lines into the opposing lane. These restrictions on passing generally occur in single lane traffic with curves, hills, and various other road hazards. 
RedDarling (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we add No Passing Zone? 

message: what is the meaning of road sign 50 180.195.143.2 (talk) 10:29, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  english
Talk:List of emulators/Archive 1

message: I'm not sure if obsolete (previously commercially available) emulators are appropriate here. If so, I've got this:
* Intel 8080
** Virtual Microsystems "The Bridge". This bug-compatible emulator ran on a variety of platforms, including VAX VMS, RSX-11, RT-11, TSX, AT&T 3B20S, and various Motorola 68000, Zilog Z8000, and Intel 8086 Unix implementations.
--Jpgordon 20:12, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete emulators 

message: Should Wikipedia involve it in a matter that is considered illegal?Erre 02:21, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: On the Legal Stuff...

message: you people are great
:i can't believe you got the full listing of them:D
:good thing i belong here:P
>x<ino 12:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  emu  

message: Should ScummVM be added to Mistaken as emulators? Jraregris 16:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ScummVM 

message: OK the list is pretty messy. I have reformatted it some, giving headings instead of indents, but it still needs alot more work. Sort the things by company, and make sure the page makes clear both which system the emulator is ON and which system the emulator is FOR.
Now that I'm done sorting all this out, I can go find that atari emulator I was looking for ... --Nerd42 02:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anybody know of an Atari emulator for the PC/WindowsXP that will do save states like emulators for other systems? It's kind of annoying not being able to save my game, particularly since I don't have the time to play it for hours on end. (I'm playing the old Adventure) --Nerd42 15:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

text: On January 29th, "tocright" gave a nice concise table of contents on the right side, that looked great.  After the changes massively expanded the table of contents, it looked awful.  I removed the "tocright" template as the least intrusive alternative that made the article look better. Aumakua 08:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformat 

message: Can we please fix the ---- contents page!
This article doesn't look professional!
:>x<ino 14:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents
Talk:Xenops

message: The introduction is wrong; this article deals with 2 genera (albeit one is monotypic and in fact its affinity with Xenops might not be as much proven fact as is assumed, given the massive amount of convergence in the entire Furnariidae). At any rate, the case for the Xenops being basal woodcreepers is quite robust. As the latter's page is also an assembly of species, not much harm is done in merging them (and actually, it would do some good too, as at present both pages are very stubby). One could go as far as to call the merged page Dendrocolaptinae, which redirects to Woodcreeper at present. See Fjeldsa et al, 2005 in the Woodcreeper article for a phylogeny. Dysmorodrepanis 10:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Nana (novel)

message: If anyone has a picture of a Nana, would he please insert it. Thanks! MOI JE CROIS 14:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Niki de Saint Phalle
Talk:Iris Clert Gallery

message: To get this page started, I basically copy and pasted an old academic paper of mine.  All of the information is correct (and cited where appropriate), but it's not in encyclopedic or wikipedic style and it tends to stray from the exact topic of the article (the gallery itself).  So, please feel free to butcher what's there to make it more suitable.
Drewcifer3000 10:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Division of Griffith

message: Counting is still in progress and the seat has not yet been declared. Nobody has won the seat until the Australian Electoral Commission says so and the writ is returned to the Governor-General. This is not politically motivated, this is entirely about factual accuracy of an encyclopaedic article. 203.9.185.136 (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead and result
Talk:Division of Groom

message: Do they vote? LessHeard vanU 21:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eh? Cattle rights? 

message: I made an edit removing the note that McVeigh was a minister under Morrison only to be put back by Thescrubbythug.
I undo what he had done with the following edit summary:
"Reasoning rejected. It is the same reasoning I made with Julie Bishop on the Curtin talk page and agreed by Frickeg"
It was only afterwards I realise that the edit summary I wrote looked confusing so I like to clear it up.
I was saying that I had rejected the reasoning given by Thescrubbythug that McVeigh had stayed on as a minister for the first four days of ScoMo's prime ministership.
"The same reasoning" I was referring to was one that I gave about Julie Bishop on Curtin talk page which I reproduce here:
"Julie Bishop being a minister under Morrison is only in the technical sense.
When there is a change of prime minister with the same party in power, the new prime minister in the immediate period decide which ministers to keep and which ministers are to go. Also an opportunity for the ministers themselves if they like to stay or to decide to stand down on their own volition. For Bishop she took that time to decide that she didn't want to continue as a minister. Not every minister is able to decide instantaneously to quit when there is a new prime minister as in the case when Kevin Rudd made his comeback in 2013 and the new prime minister has to settle in the job before deciding who he or she wants in his or her ministry. Bishop should not be noted as a Morrison minister as she wasn't one in a real sense and she certainly isn't listed in the Morrison Ministry." 
Neither McVeigh nor Bishop are listed in the Morrison Ministry.
Leftover ministers under the previous prime minister who were either dropped or chose not to continue under the new prime minister should not be considered as being ministers under this new prime minister in any real sense. 49.3.72.79 (talk) 04:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above. Frickeg (talk) 12:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  McVeigh should not be noted as a Morrison minister
Talk:Division of Herbert

message: I've removed the following rubbish from the article:
::Since the 1970s the Division of Herbert has always swung to the Government of the day, whether it be Liberal or Labor Party Representatives.
If that's true, one must wonder how the sitting government lost the seat at the 1996 election. Further, there was a pretty substational swing to the Opposition Labor Party in 1998.
::The seat is currently held safely by the Liberal Party, as is Government.
Far from a safe seat, it's likely to be one of the most hotly contested at the next election.
Dlw22 07:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the 1970s the Division of Herbert has always had a local member who is a member of the Government, whether it be Liberal or Labor Governments.
The seat is a 'safe' seat, as it is held by over 5%.  So that fact is correct.  That doesn't mean that it can't be won by Labor at the upcoming election, that's not the definition of safe, safe just means it is held by a significant amount of votes... Of course it's going to be hotly contested, because for Labor to win Government it would need a huge swing towards it, seats like Herbert will be crucial for a change in Government, however no matter what way you analyse the previous election results you have to admit that on the numbers the government is in a stronger position than any other government in recent history.
If the Election promises section for the Herbert Division doesn't belong in the Division of Herbert article where would you put it?  It is well referenced and only states fact.  WikiTownsvillian 08:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Hi Dlw22, thank you as well for the more measured language, I must say that I do respect what you do on wikipedia, particularly at the Candidates for the 2007 election page.  I had never heard of the word bellwether before, but having now read about it I agree that it is a much better way of describe the trend of Herbert voting patterns.  I agree 'swing' wasn't a very concise word to use.  I would be happy to replace 'The seat is currently held safely by the Liberal Party, as is Government.' to something I think you would be happier with, but will work on it tomorrow.  Regarding the Election Promises section, do you feel the topic is trivial and un-encyclopaedic or the content?  Obviously it is fairly light on content because there haven't been many election promises to this point in Herbert, however that will change over the next few months.  As for the topic, I would have to defer to people who are more experienced than myself on that issue.  I think an administrator could make that call or a consensus at WikiProject Australian politics. Thanks, WikiTownsvillian 10:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiction
Talk:Division of Kennedy

message: Asking for a citation that the electorate of Kennedy is bigger than Spain is stupid - it is a fact. Kennedy has an area of 568,993 square kilometers according to the Australian Electoral Commission. Spain has an area of about 505,000 square kilometers. Do you really think that somebody has conveniently written an article entitled "Electorate of Kennedy is bigger than Spain"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chukk55 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Division of Leichhardt

message: I have removed all party political bias and stuck to the most banal facts. I have added links to the candidates web sites
which is a suitable location for all party political advocacy! Sean welsh77 08:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How can this be true?  Yes, there is an enormous area which is rural, but the constituency includes the majority of the city of Cairns, which has a population of 150,000.  The latest figure given here for Leichhardt’s electorate is a little over 100,000.  Boscaswell talk 01:07, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic: Rural.  Really?
Talk:Division of Ryan

message: I think Moggill is also part of the Ryan seat, so I'll add it. If it isn't, I'm wondering why I've been getting Michael Johnson's ads. 61.69.38.80 (talk) 23:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing suburb?

message: Who won this seat? 
The candidates  page lists Michael Johnson as the winner; this page says it was Jane Prentice. So which was it? Moonraker12 (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't. The bolding is for the sitting MP. Prentice won with ease (Johnson didn't get 10%). Frickeg (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, so if Prentice won, why isn't she the sitting MP? And the numbers would be helpful, here.Moonraker12 (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because she's the new MP. Johnson went into the election as the sitting MP (i.e. the defender). The defending party, of course, was the LNP. The numbers aren't finalised yet; they'll go on all the electorate pages once the AEC declares them to be final. (We don't have the resources to continually update them across all 150 electorates.) Here's the result so far, if that helps. Frickeg (talk) 14:25, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah! And yes, the link is very helpful. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who won?
Talk:Division of Wide Bay

message: Where does that come from? Timeshift (talk) 08:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It comes from the AEC. I imagine some of it is from independent Lars Hedberg last time, but according to the AEC, most of it comes from the Liberals. As they didn't contest Wide Bay last time, I can only assume that this is the result of the redistribution. Wide Bay received over 30,000 voters in Noosa and surrounds, which in 2004 were in Fairfax, a Liberal seat. Frickeg (talk) 09:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  20% nat swing 
Talk:Italian Scots

message: Both have sizeable communities in Scotland (recent and past) and Poland also has historical links with Scotland.
It would be great to start these two articles, the Scottish goverment have great articles on both commuities.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elitejcx (talk • contribs) 00:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles for Polish Scots (Scots Polish) and Lithuanian Scots 

message: If Scotland's population is about 5 million, and about 100,000 people in Scotland are of partial Italian descent, then that means that about 1 in 50 people in Scotland is of Italian descent (which is a lot). The percentage is probably higher in Glasgow and the surrounding area but I have a few questions:
* Why did they choose to emigrate to Scotland in particular?
* Do surnames such as "Dalgarno" have Italian origins? Are merchants like Matthew Algie representative of the Italian Scottish population?
--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm interested in this topic. The article could be improved with more information 

message: Does he belong in this list or is this a case of vandalism? Nothing in the article supports his inclusion as a Scottish-Italian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwaptiva (talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerard Way 

message: How do Italian Scots count as an ethnic minority. They are white!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.66.154 (talk) 16:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is more to ethnicity than skin colour. Nicholas (talk) 11:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Indeed? So are the English people living in Scotland an ethinic minority? Or those of Irish descent? Or Poles? I've deleted the phrase. Poshseagull (talk) 07:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnic minority

message: Scots/Italians are easily the most talented 'ethnic minority' in Scotland. Unlike others, whom I won't mention, they do actually care about their adoptive country, and take pride in their Scottishness, while others who remain obsessively loyal to their ancestral home only assume a Scottish persona on the day of their wedding when they have the gall to where Highland Dress. The Italians have played a huge role in putting Scotland on the present-day cultural map thanks to their diverse talents; whereas others have gone out their way to promote division and hatred by making no effort at all to assimilate. Just wish thousands more Italians would migrate to Scotland to improve the country's image even more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.254.144 (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotland's most talented ethnic minority
Talk:Otago University Students' Association

message: I've added the "" template to the article No notability., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:No notability.. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Arbusto 03:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The number of improving edits to this page has doubled since it was renamed less than 24 hours ago. Clearly in the process of being improved.--Limegreen 05:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I should add that I agree completely with the removing of the prod (I put it up as a matter of following proper process, not in wanting to see the article be deleted).  Hopefully the article gets some work on it.  Maybe someone should actually inform OUSA about the article to see if they can provide information? --Midnighttonight remind to go do uni work! 07:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: prod

message: ===Notable Members===
The notable executive members sections could do with extending. If anyone has interesting, successful or well-known past Executive members, please seek to include them (with appropriate references). 
===Photography===
It would be nice to get images to use, such as a montage of critic covers, and a photo of an orientation concert to include in the appropriate subsections. If anyone could find or provide appropriate ones that would be great.
===Referencing===
The update has been partially referenced and I will endeavour to include more over the next few weeks.
219.88.239.39 (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2016 Big Update

message: The update has been partially referenced and I will endeavour to include more over the next few weeks.
219.88.239.39 (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Talk:Charmat process

message: if not top importace so really high importance!!--Symposiarch 20:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Over on Talk:Champagne production there is discussion of perhaps merging this article into either Champagne production (to be renamed Sparkling wine production in that case) or Sparkling wine - it ultimately depends on what we end up calling the Champagne production article but I figure it's worth flagging that discussion here. I don't think that this article really has enough scope for expansion to remain independent, it would fit much better in one of those two articles. FlagSteward 13:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now formally added a merge box - where this article ends up is a factor of what happens over on Talk:Champagne production. And I'm moving this article to Mid pending an outcome of those merger discussions. FlagSteward 10:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussions
Talk:Gail Ann Dorsey

message: Gail says she's a completely self-taught musician with no formal training . Piechjo (talk) 22:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: California Institute of the Arts