Talk:Barbara Kay controversy

message: Consensus has never been achieved on this article. Is the topic really notable? Three years later, and on sober second thought, let's discuss the advisability of deleting this article entirely. See NT:TEMP:
"Similarly an existing topic might be deleted if a later review of evidence suggests that the topic did not actually achieve notability. This can sometimes happen when notability was not discussed earlier in its history or was discussed but there was no clear consensus; when there was a flurry of media reports but it has since become clear the topic was not notable; after a significant cleanup (e.g., to remove improper or promotional material) when it is easier to judge notability; and in certain editorial disputes where time allows a more dispassionate appraisal of enduring noteworthiness."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.27.68 (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Should This article be deleted?

message: The inaccuracies at Quebec bashing have been reproduced here. I am reproducing my comments at Talk:Quebec bashing herein and removing the aforementioned inaccuracies.--Lance talk 10:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: "French-speaking Université de Montréal welcomed them [i.e., Jews]" 

message: The section on Kay's detractors needs to be completely rewritten. It is incredibly biased and littered with subjective statements and unsubstantiated claims such as this:
As a past alderman of the Town of Mount-Royal, Tetley disingenuously evoked the existence of Jewish quotas in the English-speaking Mount-Royal, which, he falsely claimed was not the case for neighbouring French-speaking Outremont, where physical and verbal attacks against the Hassidic Jewish community is common.
Not only is this grammatically incorrect, it is also blatantly biased. Unless a quantifiable source is provided for this statement, it should be struck from the article. As a resident of Mile End who interacts daily with Hasidic Jews, I also find it ridiculous. --Kilgore MTL 09:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The entire article is a mess, at present.  Changing it has been on my "to do" list for a while.  CJCurrie 06:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV: Unsubstantiated claims, editorializing 

message: As the original author of substantially all of this article, except for the nonsense retained from the text taken from 'Quebec bashing,' I take great offence to any of my edits being labled as vandalism. 
Justify further edits herein prior to making any further changes. Bofslob deleted my additional addition of an external link; and had the chutzpah to call my edits 'vandalism.' Absolute rubbish!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.211.195.38 (talk • contribs) 
:Please sign your posts and remain civil. First: are you admitting to being a sockpuppet of User:Lance6968? Second, your original text did not comply with the neutral point of view guidelines as it included a lot of personal opinion, weasel words and outright misrepresentation of the events. Because of this, numerous users have made substancial changes to make this article closer to being up to Wiki standards. The repeated reverts of such edits by a number of Montreal-based anonymous user IP's therefore constitute vandalism.--Boffob 00:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Textual changes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barbara Kay controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071021195745/http://www.barbarakay.ca/archive/20060817QuebecersindenialCounterpoint.html to http://www.barbarakay.ca/archive/20060817QuebecersindenialCounterpoint.html
*Added  tag to http://www.barbarakay.ca/archive/20061122saywhatyouwant.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060920223500/http://blocquebecois.org/archivage/com_duceppe_marcheisraelliban_060816.pdf to http://www.blocquebecois.org/archivage/com_duceppe_marcheisraelliban_060816.pdf#search=%22Israel%20site%3Awww.blocquebecois.org%22
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105075724/http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=54bc6573-fbd5-494c-95aa-feb2f3a01b2d to http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=54bc6573-fbd5-494c-95aa-feb2f3a01b2d
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105075433/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/editorial/story.html?id=bd84b0b3-9211-432e-a31b-cadc09219e44&p=2 to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/editorial/story.html?id=bd84b0b3-9211-432e-a31b-cadc09219e44&p=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105075312/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=cf78708a-d0f9-4daf-96be-40e27bf9ff24&k=57547 to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=cf78708a-d0f9-4daf-96be-40e27bf9ff24&k=57547
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105075707/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=7acf5e44-59ad-4869-af82-c46e1bbff14e to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=7acf5e44-59ad-4869-af82-c46e1bbff14e
*Added  tag to http://www.conseildepresse.qc.ca/decisions/D2006-08-009.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=10524e16-36f2-4975-910d-9407471f2261&k=91928
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified