lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Land mobile radio system

message: Regarding (sub section Interference in the spectrum):
: "One technician likened it to a whisper competing with a yell"
Is that for Wikipedia?
And is that long quote needed?
--Mortense (talk) 14:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopedic? 

message: I have to admit that I didn't get it from this article. Is that a standard? A principle? Something else? Moreover, is this article relevant only to North America or also to the rest of the world? Same question for the mentioned frequency bands.
The article as it is now isn't really informative. Babbling about garage openers doesn't help either. If the above questions aren't answered, it would be better to reduce the article to a stub with just a quality definition. Kind regards, Arny (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what exactly is LMRS?
Talk:Lusofonia Games

message: Do you think we should rename it "Lusofonia Games"? Their website has become very slow lately. --Pedro 12:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we should. I don't get why they don't officially translate it but, for matters of accuracy, we should use the official spelling. Joaopais 20:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it should be "Lusophony Games" - you either translate it all or nothing (it's like "Torino Games 2006"...), but the official name is the language mix, so what do we do? Parutakupiu talk || contribs 20:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: In English this and all related pages should be "Lusophone Games."  There is no word "Lusophony" in English; the correct translation is "Lusophone."  If you check on Google the only place this is called "Lusophony" is in Wikipedia, and there is no other usage of the term "Lusophony."  Bruxism (talk) 04:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lusophony or Lusofonia Games?
Talk:Tacoma, New South Wales

message: I'm curious as to where this city got its name, considering the city of Tacoma, Washington (USA) was named after a mis-understanding of a local tribe's name for the nearby Mount Rainier (Tahoma).  Did Australians copy this name, or is there some Aboriginal or other local source of this name in Australia?  Chibiabos (talk) 12:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Civil Aviation Safety Authority

message: At the time of the creation of the Department of Aviation (May 1982) accident investigation was carried out by the Department's Air Safety Investigation Branch (ASIB).  In June 1982 the ASIB was abolished and a separate statutory authority, the Bureau of Air Safety Investigation (BASI), was created.  The BASI became part of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) in 1999.  See HERE.
I have amended the article about CASA to remove the statement that the safety investigation function was removed from the Civil Aviation Authority and handed to the ATSB in 1995, coincident with creation of Air Services Australia and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority.  See my diff. Dolphin (t) 01:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of safety investigation
Talk:M3/A3 (Brisbane)

message: We need a source for the section between Eight Mile Plains and Brisbane CBD. Google and Bing Maps have it as the "M3 - Pacific Mwy" but IQAtlas using PSMA (http://qspatial.information.qld.gov.au/IQAtlas/) data has it as "MetRoad 3 - South East Fwy". I personally would go with the preference of government data from IQAtlas and change it later if and when the government mapping gets updated. Theclem54 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 05:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a discussion regarding moving/redirecting/merging the Brisbane Metroad articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian Roads#Brisbane Metroads - proposed moves.2C redirects and merges. Please comment there if you are interested. Thanks, Evad37 [talk] 01:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brisbane Metroads - proposed moves, redirects and merges
Talk:Solidarity action

message: In the United Kingdom, sympathy strikes were outlawed under the Thatcher government in 1980
I was under the impression that it was outlawed in 1927, can anyone confirm that extra legislation was passed in 1980; possibly the name of the act. Y control 12:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK 

message: What of it's predecessor? The Clayton Anti-Trust act? Doesn't that act allow for exemption of Union boycotts from the sherman act?Serialjoepsycho (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned by the Sherman anti-trust act? 

message: The discussion on Sweden consists of a 2023 case of Tesla. This might be interesting in an article on Tesla or in a timeframe of few years, as it will become clear if this is important at the level of such a broad topic. I will add regular text on Sweden based on a comparative review source. I also propose to delete the text about Tesla in the spirit of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:UNDUE. Викидим (talk) 17:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed The sun when it rains (talk) 13:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Proposal was unopposed for two weeks, deleting the text. Викидим (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden
Talk:Battlestar Galactica: The Second Coming

message: And the question still remains.
Has anyone else out there seen the trailer recently?
Richard Hatch shows the trailer only at conventions he attends. His reasoning, prior to the new series coming out, was that as he was trying to use it to gain studio support for the project, he did not allow it to be downloadable over the net in order to keep the look of it professional. --BlueSquadronRaven 00:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a 'The neutrality of this article is disputed' tag on the article.  What's the dispute?  I came to this talk page and I don't see anything about it.  A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't add the tag, but I presume the tag's there because the article appears to take sides.  The bigger issue is that it has no citations at all.  Xihr  20:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Uhm, it seems from the edit history that you did add the POV tag.  Oh well, since no-one is interested in explaining why the tag was placed I'm going to remove it. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 23:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The neutrality of this article is disputed? 

message: Possibly related to the above, there was an unsourced statement regarding Hatch's finances with regards to this production. Without a reputable source, this statement is totally unacceptable under the WP:BLP policy and I have removed it from the article. Note that under the policies WP:RS and WP:NOR even if Hatch made such a comment at one of the showings, we can't use that as a source. There has to be a magazine or book reference, or a reference on a reputable website (for now Wikipedia does not accept most blogs as RS) in order for such information to be cited here. 23skidoo (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of [[WP:BLP]] violation
Talk:International Mathematical Olympiad Training Camp

message: The article says "Nearly half the people who have made it to the IOI team have also attended the IMOTC". Is this true? 15 people have represented India at IOI so far (see India at the IOI). Besides the four mentioned, are there others who were at IMOTC? Kprateek88 12:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Half the people in IOI team in IMOTC?

message: The IOITC page has a number of photos that lend an air of authenticity to the page.
Does anybody have corresponding photos to upload for the IMOTC? If so, please do upload.
Vipul 03:57, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos/pictures for the IMOTC? 

message: This reads more like an IMOTC brochure than anything. Even if we ignore the notability problem for the moment, I'm afraid this can't be called an encyclopedia article from any angle. I'll add the notability and wiki tags. Bubka42 (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and wikification
Talk:Irwin's turtle

message: I can't provide evidence because I haven't seen it in ages, but there is an episode of Croc Files where Terri and Steve went looking for the species and commented about the fact that it had a pink nose (saying that it looked like steve in a way because of it). I wasn't sure about putting it into the article.
I have seen the turtle in person and I did not notice a pink nose. Perhaps this was an isolated individual instead of a species trait? Jtlloyd (talk) 08:10, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The animal has a white nose. However some variations exist. ZooPro 06:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Its pink nose

message: Just wanted to note here the photograph being used is incorrectly identified. As per my comment on commons HERE. Cheers Faendalimas talk 23:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update to another photo. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 01:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Identification 

message: If it was named , surely the specific epithet should be irwinorum? Have any sources emended the name accordingly? Or does anyone have access to the original paper to confirm the etymology is to honor both of them? Umimmak (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it was named after Steve Irwin in honor of them. So it is correctly irwini. original description. I have edited the page to correct this and added the pdf to the citation. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 07:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect original spelling?
Talk:List of Sleeper Cell episodes

message: This isn't one serieis
it is two mini-series
--Torourkeus 19:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is in two chapters, didn't Season (Chapter 2) air in October? All episodes are on-demand and I have now seen them all, seems silly that they haven't even aired yet. I know they are "re-airing" since Dec 10th, but I was under the impression this was for the second time. Nicht Nein! 22:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:LAW 80

message: "Upon firing, the .22 cartridge case sets back out of the 7.62 mm casing", I cannot understand this statement. Can someone expand on it? What is "sets back out" mean? Maury 12:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than me trying to explain it, look at this link  - the spotting rifle from the LAW 80 was used on the SMAW.  I've never seen this system used before, would be nice to get some non-copyright pictures for the article. Riddley 00:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spotting rifle

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The article doesn't has any photos of this anti-tank weapon.These sites: [] and [] have photos of this weapon.Agre22 (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: The LAW 80 was most certainly renamed the "LAW94" as part of later number designation for AT weapons possibly because of a protracted development period. The 84mm Carl Gustav remained in service until the 90's alongside the MILAN, the LAW80 took quite some time to replace it on general issue.
Training posters and manuals refer to it as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.92.34 (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "LAW 94"
Talk:Drug Tariff

message: About your objection to the Drug Tariff - just because a GP has not heard about it does not mean it is not an important document, worthy of Wikipedia.
In fact you could fail pharmacy registration exams if you do not know your way around it.
All community pharmacies use this document, especailly for pricing. It also gives details on what charges a patient has to pay for drugs e.g. three charges for Heliclear and Tridestra, or one charge for each stocking, not found in BNF or MEP. Also it has all the blacklisted items listed (denoted in the BNF with a NHS in a box with a diagonal line through it).
Please go see their website - http://www.drugtariff.com/
Again this document is not used by GPs generally (though with an increasing number of dispensing GPs maybe they should) but a lot by pharmacists!
I have deleted your objection and put some more info that the Drug Tariff is used by dispensing pharmacists and doctors.
Yours
Lethaniol 12:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objection 
Talk:Rolls-Royce Spey

message: Flying at low altitude requires much more fuel; the air-fuel mixture needs to be kept very close to a constant value to burn properly, so more air means you need to use more fuel.  is incorrect, it just harder to move through high dencity air. PeterGrecian 12:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the phrasing isn't really the best, but the general idea is correct -- with a higher *amount* of oxygen at lower altitudes, the engine needs more fuel to burn, or it'll run too lean and flame out. (You're also correct, of course -- there's more drag at lower altitude due to higher air density as well, but this is only a minor contribution to the greater fuel burn.)--chris.lawson 15:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

text: PeterGrecian is correct: more drag needs more thrust needs more fuel. 86.181.115.142 (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Low altitude fuel consumption
Talk:K. Ullas Karanth

message: The 2 pages are about the same individual. Sdsouza 12:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[k ullas karanth]]

message: I've added the photo of Dr. Karanth I took several weeks back. Not sure why the thumbnail is not getting rendered properly (or is just on this machine?). I shall count on somebody to fix it if it ain't right. Cheers, --H P Nadig \Talk \Contributions 06:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Photo
Talk:Antelias

message: This was posted by an IP since blocked for vandalism (which has however also made some sensible edits) and in the wrong section.  I have no idea whether it is true or not.--QuantumEngineer 21:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please check 

message: "The scenario was to be repeated 123 years later when the Progressive Socialist Party of Druze Warlord Walid Jumblatt attempted with some success to ethnically cleanse Mount Lebanon of its Christians after the Israeli partial withdrawal from Lebanon in 1982."
Sentence above is:
* Irrelevant to the article (the article is about Antelias)
* Obviously POV 
* Inaccurate (Israel withdrew from the Chouf in 1983)
* No proof of ethnic cleansing during the Mountain War
I propose deletion of this sentence. Will delete it if no objections are raised in this discussion. FH (talk) 15:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Dispute [[Antelias#Historical_Interest|Antelias (Historical Interest)]]
Talk:Bagdad, Florida

message: The section about Top Gear is pure trivia and has nothing to do with the town itself. I don't think that this tidbit adds much to the article. It is a remark made by media personalities who were merely passing through the town. After all, not every remark made in every episode of Top Gear must be integrated into Wikipedia. If editors feel that some connection to the city in Iraq must be stated, perhaps the historical origins of the name could be discussed. A quick search returns this history page, although it only says that the town is probably named after the Iraqi city because of its position between two rivers. If no one responds with a convincing reason to keep this trivia, I will remove it. --Daveblack (talk) 06:14, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: On Television
Talk:100-yen shop

message: The article is more than a stub but could have more detail - Start rating. The subject is a noticeable feature of daily life in Japan - Mid importance. Grgcox 06:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assigned status and importance

message: I've merged this article to Variety store. —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-22 22:52Z
:*Not quite sure why you didn't just leave it as it's own article, as God knows there are plenty of worthless articles on Wikipedia that are merely stubs. Shadowrun 10:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored article, since lots of infos were dropped in the merge, and i think the topic justifies its own article. -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged to [[Variety store]]
Talk:Quincy, Florida

message: Is this subsection really noteworthy enough to include? Seems like a non-story to me but I wanted to pose the question before I got rid of it completely. Amscheip (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Essence article
Talk:Capital flows in Japan

message: Where's the introduction? That's not something I've seen missing in a long time. Also, the "debtor to creditor" section looks awfully long, complex, and intimidating. Is there any way to break this up? Maybe add some pictures or graphs or something? LordAmeth 23:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Six years later, I want to know the same things. Tagged with a "Lead Missing" banner. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Assessment
Talk:Monetary and fiscal policy of Japan

message: This is important to be mentioned, Att 191.251.88.165 (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  % of private debt and public debt? 
Talk:Idora Park (Youngstown)

message: Made extensive enhancements to the existing page.  Please help improve this page to honor the great memories of this park.  Thanks!  --Progohio 19:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved existing content, created headings, created current carousel info 

message: It seems like the stuff on Jane's Carousel might deserve its own page.  It seems overrepresented in this article, given that most of it is post-Idora Park history. Bunnyhugger (talk) 07:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jane's Carousel
Talk:The Winslow Boy (1999 film)

message: Although The Winslow Boy had a G rating, it was neither the only nor the first Sony Pictures Classics release to do so. Wings of Courage, Across the Sea of Time, The Road Home, Not One Less, and Winged Migration all were Sony Classics releases and were rated G also. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: G rating
Talk:Shane Jones

message: What is the deal with the constant changes to this page...? Always goat related! Insaneassassin247 13:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As Jones has left his wife and has a new partner how should this be presented in the infobox? This edit replaced the name of his spouse and removed the reference to his children. But he is apparently still married and of course still has the children! Is it correct to change "spouse" to "partner""; add "ex-wife" to the infobox and note that the children are by his ex-wife not partner? DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 09:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Manual of Style, "the purpose of an infobox [is] to summarize key facts in the article in which it appears." The article does not discuss his later private life. If it is important to talk about ex wifes and new partners, this would have to be added to the article itself. Once it's there, we can decide whether those details are "key facts" that should be included in the infobox. Not that I'm consistent about this myself, but I would suggest that few spouses of politicians should be included in infoboxes. Schwede66 17:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital status
Talk:William Brett, 1st Viscount Esher

message: I have edited this article to introduce a note of caution to the astonishing suggestion that Euegenie Mayer (my great great great grandmother) was "probably" the illegitimate daughter of Napoleon Bonaparte. This is news to me and I would love to know the source for this facinating claim. Fanny Mayer (nee Kreisammer) was certainly famed for her beauty and there is considerable mystery surrounding Eugenie's date of birth, but it would be surprising if Fanny's second husband Colonel John Gurwood, a self-publicist of some record, knew about her connection to the emperor and never mentioned anything about it.
--Mattbrett 13:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article, citing this reference, states that Brett rowed in the 1836 Boat Race. However, the article List of Cambridge University Boat Race crews cites another reference, which has Brett rowing against Oxford in 1839. Can somebody with access to other sources please resolve this apparent inconsistency? Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I have changed the Boat Race year to 1839, and replaced British History with W. B. Woodgate as a reference. – Wdchk (talk) 02:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boat Race – 1836 or 1839?
Talk:Mary Lundby

message: These are the sources for the information in the House and Senate leadership templates:   
--Tim4christ17 talk 05:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for information in the templates 
Talk:Samo ljubezen

message: AFAIK, Sestre are drag queens and not transsexuals. It would be good to find a source clarifying that, though first I hear of them being anything more than drag queens with regard to "gender ambiguity". Cheers, Bravada, talk - 13:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't think of the exact year, but either Norway or Sweden had a drag queen as a backing dancer in the mid/late 1980s. I daresay I'll find out exactly when later on when I hit the Norwegian or Swedish songs. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 02:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

text: 1986 Norway - there was a drag guy backing Ketil Stokkan.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 03:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Motor České Budějovice

message: * Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:HC Ceske Budejovice logo.png
Talk:Battlestar Galactica (TV series)

message: While it may have been inappropriate to redirect to Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series), I don't believe this page really needs its own distinct disambiguation, separate from Battlestar Galactica (disambiguation). Can't we just redirect there? Is there a consensus on closely-related disambiguation pages? This one, at least, seems unnecessary to me... -- Fru1tbat 21:52, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, redirect to Battlestar Galactica (disambiguation). --Usgnus 21:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure which one you decided on, but I thought I'd add my two cents in the mean time: I'm not sure it would be a good idea to link to this (a second disambiguation page) from the "master" disambiguation page. The master page should be clear enough (and it's all that big) that someone should be able to find their way directly to whatever article they're looking for. Hence my original recommendation to redirect there from here... -- Fru1tbat 22:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect or disambiguation? 

message: Since this talk page is now being actively used to discuss the disambiguation page, there's no need to delete it. --Usgnus 21:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: db removal