lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Holy Week in Seville

message: It's not only the translation, which is awful, the article is almost ininiteligible for non-spaniards (and even for many of them).
I'll try to bring it in better shape, but any help would be welcome (I have a lot of doubts on correct english translation of many specialized terms)
--Wllacer 12:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a lot of work 

message: I've seen the last few days some updates which seem to look like an edit war  As I see it, the question is one more of more or less detail at some entries. I beg everyone, if there is some doubt please let's discuss it here before triggering the undo / delete button, or at least give some hint of why something was done
i just reverted the last change by User:Gen Decilmus because it left the introduction of the article without some approach of a definition. May not be the best text ... but better than nothing.--Wllacer (talk) 11:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeal to contributor to avoid an edit war 

message: An anonymous user changed the entry of the Cristo de Burgos confrary, but sadly, it seems to have mixed data from -probably- La Vera+Cruz. If the contributor thinks the desaparition/reorganization stuff belongs to the Cristo de Burgos, can please provide his/her sources here? 
I've deleted the reference to silence, as is common with the ruan brotherhoods. IIRC There is only explicit reference to it in the El Silencio, for obvious -for those knowledgable- reasons. I've kept his reference to the image, though --Wllacer (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting the '''Cristo de Burgos''' entry 
Talk:Municipalities of Spain

message: It turns out that the map submitted by Kelisi has a mistake which is 'Alorcón' the real name of that city is Alcorcón. Of course, it's not that much of a deal, but it is worth correcting. Of course I appreciate all the work he has put into the map, because those mistakes happen to everyone every now and then. You know why the first thing I checked was Alcorcón.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.40.174.216 (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the photos has a mistake
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Tarragona

message: I think that either articles should be created for at least some of the Archbishops of Tarragona, or the red links should be deleted as they make the page look messy.
I know that one of the Archbishops of Tarragona during Ferdinand II's reign as King of Aragon, committed incest (I don't know who with though?) MC, 25th February 2007, 13:31.
:I vote for creation of pages on the Archbishops. This works quite well when these articles get better. Benkenobi18 23:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this image of the cathedral for the archdiocese? If so, it is freely licensed by one of my flickr contacts. Someone should upload it if it is the right cathedral. Royalbroil 00:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image?
Talk:National Day of Catalonia

message: I want to add:
Many citizens wave senyeres and estelades.
Thank U  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.13.90.244 (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I just realised that the wording in the in-set summary is correct, hence I will amend it myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmarinuk (talk • contribs) 16:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I was in that demonstration myself ... with one and a half million people marching down the Diagonal. The largest demonstration ever of my life until May 1st 2002 in Havanna. --L.Willms (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1977: First celebration since victory of fascism 

message: Catalonia is not a nation
Nobody reconize catalonia like “a nation” even the catalan people.
Only the radical nationalist thinks catalonia is a nation. Only them 31.221.166.164 (talk) 12:50, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No a Nation, change title
Talk:Ana de Mendoza y de Silva, Princess of Éboli

message: The Princess of Eboli figured in the biography of St. Teresa. The Princess of Eboli and her husband generously invited Teresa to establish convents for Carmelites in Pastrana. The monks were established there, before the nuns. The first structure built for Teresa's nuns did not suit the preferences of Teresa; it was rebuilt to suit her liking. The nuns moved in; unfortunately, the Prince of Eboli died, thereupon, Ana de Mendoza decided that she too, would become a Carmelite. However, the Carmelite discipline was ill-suited to her: she insisted on a servant in the convent, could not follow the rigors of the order, and allegedly had a door to the street constructed to which her cell opened. This was too much for the prioress of the convent. Upon Teresa's advice, the nuns left in the dead of the night, leaving the Princess of Eboli all by herself. 
You may check Marcelle Auclair's biography on Teresa, as well as Jose Luis Olaizola's "The Loves of Saint Teresa" as well as Teresa's own biography about references to the Princess of Eboli. An account of the Princess of Eboli's side on the whole affair, and her impressions of Teresa are found in Olaizola's book. 
I suggest you study this. Thanks.
Rrcs law (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone has found an English translation of Olaizola's book, Los amores de Teresa de Jesús, it might be used as a source for Princess of Eboli's interactions with Teresa of Avila  Vereverde (talk) 19:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Teresa of Avila

message: Princess of Éboli would be better - it is so in Spanish, and her husband is called here like this, Prince of Éboli. --Zbrnajsem (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Princess of Éboli 

message: Any historical records discuss what happened to her right eye? Curious if "The Princess Problem" was right about her getting stabbed during a childhood sword fight or not. ScratchMarshall (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: How was she blinded

message: The article says she gave birth to 10 children, but only nine are listed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.104.18.99 (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Jorge Martínez (motorcyclist)

message: Mighty Antar 21:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Martín Fernández de Navarrete

message: If he was born in 1765 and died in 1844 that would make him 79 when he died not 58. 152.97.29.4 (talk) 02:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age at time of death 

message: According to this article, Navarrete had a large part in translating and editing Columbus' first journal. He updated much of the writing to be relevant and grammatically correct in the 1800s, and did so accurately given his naval experience. The article is cited here in another Wikipedia Article. Matthewq49 (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His work writing The Diario of Christopher Columbus's First Voyage to America 

message: Propose to change info card from using the template "Infobox Scientist" to Infobox: Military Person as it allows space for more information about military career and later works. Also, Infobox Scientist specifically states, "fields	Principal fields of work (physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, engineering, &c) not occupation (physicist...engineer)" which this article currently does. Matthewq49 (talk) 06:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to Infobox: Military Person
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Yamla

message: Please note that I have been overwhelmed with work recently and have not had a chance to get back to this.  That reflects poorly on me, it is my responsibility to respond here.  I am just noting that I fully intend to write up some more responses.  Invariably, I'm not going to please everyone but at the least, I can listen and respond and perhaps we can move forward.  --Yamla 03:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: If you object let me know below, otherwise I'll delist it sometime tomorrow. --Spartaz Humbug! 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shall we delist this? Its two weeks since the last post?
Talk:National Dance Week

message: This organization is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that has been in existance for many years. It is a noncomercial organization organized to promote the art form of dance. No one in the organization porfits from it, as it is not a business.
The organization would be akin to any "(blank) week organization, such as in "Family History Week" http://www.familyhistoryweek.org.au/ .
:Hello! The reason that I flagged the article is because it appears to exist to promote the organization. Non-profits can still be promoted, indeed, prominent non-profits receive advertising all the time! There's also no indication why the organization is notable, as no secondary sources are cited. If you do know of some secondary sourcing which has written about this organization, I can help you in sourcing that and cleaning up the ad tone. Seraphimblade 03:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you've got some claim to notability on it, I've removed the request for speedy deletion. The article will need secondary sourcing of that, but I would imagine it received some coverage when the proclamation took place. Seraphimblade 08:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Those will work very well! I've done some work to the article, and those seem to establish notability. Thanks for providing them! Seraphimblade 09:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

text: We were all new once! If you need help with anything, ask away. Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 17:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Notability is demonstrated by the references and external links.  Also, "National Dance Week" gets 40,000+ google hits. I'm removing the notability tag. Puddlduk 19:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: being a dedicated dancer, I cannot help but express my disgust with the NDW organization. It claims to promote dance, but in fact its prime yet undeclared goal is to promote dance merchandise. Just take a look at the website:the top links in the list are sell/sell/sell/sell. "Nonrpofit organization", my ass. No wonder they cannot get their 503 status for over 10 years and say not a single word about their corporate structure. `'mikka 18:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disgusting
Talk:Ramón Sampedro

message: The paragraphs under "Death and Aftermath" are the same as some here:
http://www.butyoudontlooksick.com/2007/03/movie_review_the_sea_inside_ak.php  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.7.228.115 (talk) 07:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death and Aftermath 
Talk:Cerro de los Ángeles

message: I've commented out the photo which purported to show Reblican militiamen shooting at a statue of Christ because its source, subject and purpose are unknown.  For more information, please see this discussion on the talk page of the editor who uploaded the image. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 23:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Article should have an image of the prewar monument inaugurated in 1919. Drutt (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

text: There is an image on this page. I'm not sure of the legal availability of it. Drutt (talk) 22:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This page also discusses the notorious shooting incident, stating that it occurred on 28 July 1936, while the monument itself was destroyed on 7 August 1936. 28 July 1936 is the date when the Spanish government ordered the confiscation of Church property in Spain. Drutt (talk) 23:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with provenance of image
Talk:Security and Assault Corps

message: Could someone more skilled in Wikipedia editing than I am please add (Spain) to the recently amended title of this article. 
Security and Assault Corps could apply to  
the national armies/gendarmerie/police of several countries. Thank you.   Buistr (talk) 22:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of translated title
Talk:Regulares

message: A number of edits have just been made to this article. Most of these were valid but I wonder if further consideration could be given to the following (which I have provisionally deleted):
(i) The refence to the Primo de Rivera coup of 1923: did this actually have any direct connection with the use of Moroccan troops as ceremonial guards at the Royal Palace that year or was it simply a coincidence resulting from increased public awareness of the Army of Africa? If the former then I will restore the passage with apologies.
(ii) Spanish and International condemnation of the use of Moorish troops in the suppression of the Asturian rising of 1934. Was this actually because of atrocities committed by the Regulares? If so could we have a cited source reference please. My reading of (admittedly foreign) contemporary media reporting on the suppression of the rising suggests that (a) the Civil Guard and the Legion were responsible for most of the actual reprisals; and (b) criticism outside Spain of the involvement of Regulares largely reflected racially based distaste of the time for the use of "native" colonial troops in Europe. 
(iii) The comment that the Regulares in the Civil War of 1936-39 were "feared and hated by Spaniards because they perpetuated many massacres on the civilian population". Certainly this was true but their "undoubted brutality" is already referred to earlier in this section and the Spanish Civil War (like many civil wars) was notable for atrocities on both sides. Should the Regulares carry the major blame for this when the Tercio, Republican militias, Falangists etc largely escape criticism - at least in Wikipedia coverage?
(iv) Finally, the comment that Franco's Moorish ceremonial honour guard was "greatly resented by many Spaniards". Quite possibly but could we have a cited reference for what might otherwise appear a POV statement. buistR 22:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Hatred" of the Regulares
Talk:Massachusetts Marauders

message: I realize that every team’s page is named after the team last name, but more people remember them as the Detroit Drive.--68.154.22.149 21:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I stumbled upon this page and thought the same thing. I'm trying to think of a precedent from one of the Big Four professional leagues. — X96lee15 (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Massachusetts Marauders?
Talk:Spanish National Research Council

message: Not sure that moving the article from CSIC to its current title is a good idea. Scientific literature in English refers to CSIC and anyone wishing to check it out would therefore look it up on Wikipedia under those initials. Obviously the translation into English of the full name should figure in the lead but the article should appear under the name most people would associate with it. Feedback? --Technopat (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSIC vs Spanish National Research Council 

message: I added teh WP:LINKROT flag, which a user removed without resolving teh issue - User has been informed, is aware. I am re-adding flag.--Wuerzele (talk) 14:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkrot
Talk:National Statistics Institute (Spain)

message: The title should use English as once reverted 3 years back. Their English site seems to use "National Statistics Institute". Any objections? - Ruodyssey (talk) 12:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as the any institution such as this one should have the title in English, as English speakers shouldn't have to know the Spanish name of the organization. It seems to make sense.--MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Spanish order of precedence

message: The Dowager Duchess of Calabria and the Duke of Hernani and Soria are respectively the widow of an Infante of Spain and the husband of an Infanta of Spain, but they are not an Infanta or an Infante themselves. The Royal Decree 2099/1983 does not explicitly assign any official precedence to consorts of Infantes/Infantas, but rather only to Infantes/Infantas properly. Why did the Wikipedia editors include the Duke of Hernani and the Dowager Duchess of Calabria in the Spanish order of precedence then? 189.68.34.112 (talk) 19:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about the precedence of consorts of Infantes/Infantas
Talk:Balmis Expedition

message: Lady Mary Wortley Montague, who had survived smallpox, brought the process of innoculation back from the Ottoman Empire in about 1718.  Innoculation involved taking pus from a recovering smallpox victim and scratching it into the skin of a healthy person, who would then have a milder case of the disease.  This process was slow to be accepted, but was in fairly wide use across Europe in 1800.
Edward Jenner reported, in 1796, that infection with a related but much milder disease, cowpox, would entirely prevent smallpox.  This process, which he called vaccination (from 'cow') caught on a bit more rapidly but was now widely popular, even in England, by 1800.
That Dr. Balmis carried a significant number of orphan boys on an expedition in 1804 suggests that he was innoculating them in series rather than vaccinating.
Jojo-acapulco 16:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Innoculation vs. vaccination

message: I can't find a Infanta Maria Teresa anywhere besides in this article. I'd out her name through Google and I can't find any. The Family tree of Spanish monarchs doesn't have her name on it. In this article, something similar didn't even happen:
Gabriel, King Charles's brother, and his sister-in-law, the Portuguese queen Maria Ana Victoria, succumbed to smallpox. In addition, the king's daughter, Queen Maria Luisa, and the Princess of Parma were all infected with the smallpox virus but survived
It could be that I'm bad at researching but I can't confirm her existence.
The Malaysian Redcoat (talk) 08:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existence of Infanta Maria Teresa 

message: Its rare, but compared to the spanish version this article is lacking a lot of details. 2A0C:5A84:E30C:2700:B973:B04F:643B:8749 (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompleteness
Talk:Barcelona Supercomputing Center

message: Included in the stated composition of the Consortium is "Spanish Ministry of Education and Science".  What would be the appropriate article to link this to in Wikipedia?  There is the article Ministry of Education (Spain) and Spanish National Research Council ... would the Ministry of Education be a proper link?  Thanks for clarifying. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consortium composition 
Talk:1977 Atocha massacre

message: Per WP:CONCISE ("Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that") this page should be named Atocha massacre. There are no other Atocha massacres that this needs to be differentiated from. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, there has been more than one massacre at or near a place called "Atocha", and in particular at or near Atocha (Madrid). It's obvious on the Spanish Wikipedia: :es:Matanza de Atocha ("Atocha massacre") is a disambiguation page for :es:Matanza de Atocha de 1977 (the event covered in this article) and :es:Atentados del 11 de marzo de 2004 (the 2004 Madrid train bombings, which took place at and near the Madrid Atocha railway station). — Chrisahn (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You make a good point. I withdraw the proposal. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe Atocha massacre should be a disambiguation page for this page and 2004 Madrid train bombings instead of a redirect to this page? Just like on the Spanish Wikipedia? On the other hand, the redirect to this page is correct for all three links to Atocha massacre. So maybe the redirect is fine for now. — Chrisahn (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move (withdrawn)
Talk:Aben Humeya

message: This is a yarn that has no reference, yet it is all over Wikipedia. Every time I remove it someone puts it back. Don't be so desperate for converts. I am removing it and request that it not be put back until you come up with a RELIABLE source. "Christian sources"? Then you may as well change the Wiki entry for Jesus Christ to say he foretold the coming of Muhammad according to "Muslim sources". Will you? No? Okay, then be consistent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.136.104.21 (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You see, my friend, in 16th century Spain, there were no such things as "Secular sources". It was the era of inter-religious rivalries and fundamentalism. History was written by religious people, be they Muslim or Christian, and being human and religious zealots of course projected their own biases into their work. Nothing had to go through peer review. Plus, Aben Humeya did not write his own autobiography. Anyway, most of the account of Aben Humeya's comes from the account of the Christian historian Marmol. So, if we have to dismiss this statement, because it was claimed by Christian sources, then we have to simply delete most of the info about Humeya's life. Moreover, Christian sources are used in other Moorish articles as well such as Al-Andalus, Moriscos, Mozarabs, Muladi, etc. Joyson Noel Holla at me 07:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogus conversion to Christianity
Talk:Arbitrista

message: The article as it stands appears pretty modest, although the topic is very important. Over the next two months or so I plan to replace it with a translation the corresponding article in Spanish Wikipedia. Stammer 14:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have to postopne this.Stammer 07:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Template talk:Infobox abortion method/Archive 1

message: *Other names: field for alternate names for a procedure, such as acronyms like "D&C" or "MVA," or informal names like "RU-486."-Severa  (!!!) 04:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas for new fields

message: I consider myself an adherent of WP:TIMID before WP:BOLD, so, I'd prefer if we had a "dress rehearsal" before we went live with the template, in order to work out any possible remaining kinks. Would it be possible to copy the template here so that we could see what it would look like with all (or most) of the fields filled with real information on a real method (say, D&C)? This way we can get an idea of what the template will look like when it is put to use in an article.
Also, I hate to ask so much of you, but seeing as how you're the one who knows about configuring and setting up an infobox, it's probably best that you set it up, rather than risk me bungling something up. :-) -Severa  (!!!) 12:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Going live

message: I'm sorry that I've neglected this template of late. It's slipped through the cracks in terms of what I've been paying attention to on Wikipedia, because there've been a lot of disagreements lately throughout abortion-related articles, and I've been kind of preoccupied, I suppose. Please feel free to go live with this template, David Ruben, or, if you'd like me to help, I'll be back from vacation on Sunday. Thanks! -Severa  (!!!) 03:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template neglect
Talk:Balt dynasty

message: Why there is nothing about barons Talarico who claimed origin from Alaric?--Greutungen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greutungen (talk • contribs) 12:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talarico 

message: I don't think the Edward Gibbon quote re "Boax/Baux" is relevant or worthwhile.
Possibly a lot more needs to be done with this article in general.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.48.83.17 (talk) 23:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this relevant? 