Talk:Khabarovsk

message: Is this article NPOV?  Parts of it don't sound it.
--KG
Well then, edit it to make it NPOV.  Or at least specify what you don't like about it. Balcer 19:32, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comments from 2005

message: "Manchu-Korean forces met the Russians at Sharhody (Chinese: 沙尔虎达 Russian: Шарходы/Шарходе Hangul:의례목성 (어라이무청)), on the mouth of the Sungari River, killing 270 Russians and driving them out of Manchu territory."
That's not POV?! --SergeiXXX 00:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, the passage in question refers to the description of Russians taking over of the Manchu territory.  What exactly do you see as a POV problem in this sentence?  It was a Manchu territory after all.  Or do you mean something else?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 00:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is no political correctness in words killing 270 Russians and driving them out of Manchu territory. I certain that in some russian notes of that times Manchu were just retrogrades and they were only able to kill themselves in front of danger. I hope there is no place for insults in the free Encyclopedia. 
But it is evident the article has been written by a Korean, hehe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.24.241.27 (talk) 14:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

text: There is a great series of postings, in Russian, on the events of the period here: http://www.gerodot.ru/viewtopic.php?t=13026 Although this is in a forum format, and not in a journal article (so we can't use it is a reference - but we can look up some of the same info in other sources), I believe that the poster is a professional historian who's published some journals articles and at least one book on the Manchu-Korean and Manchu-Russian conflicts of the 17th century. One of his sources is apparently Polyakov's mutineers' denunciation letter against Khabarov, published by B.P. Polevoy in the 1990s (which is online, and is now among the references to this article). Vmenkov (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 17th century events

message: I don't see any reference on this page to the labor camp in Khabarovsk... a Japanese solider I was researching was taken there after the war and died there in 1950. Was this a different Khabarovsk? Is the camp of too low importance/significance in the big picture to be mentioned? Or is it simply not mentioned just because it's been overlooked? I apologize if I sound accusatory - I do not intend to be. I am simply ignorant as to the history of Soviet labor camps, and Japanese POWs, and in particular the history or significance of the one at Khabarovsk. LordAmeth 01:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Labor camp

message: I saw some good pictures on the Russian wiki article, so I assume they are fair use, though I don't speak Russian, so I don't know if the pictures have any warnings. Perhaps to spruce up the article a bid, someone better at this can transfer some of those pictures? Leoberacai 12 February 2008.  —Preceding comment was added at 22:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Khabarovsk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070502123815/http://www.mtcha.com.ne.kr/korea-term/sosun/term86-nasunjungbul.htm to http://mtcha.com.ne.kr/korea-term/sosun/term86-nasunjungbul.htm
*Added  tag to http://dicimg.empas.com/art/k03n001801m4.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201172835/http://vestnik.tripod.com/articles/conflicts.html to http://vestnik.tripod.com/articles/conflicts.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Khabarovsk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060525063941/http://www.inauka.ru/discovery/article35236.html to http://www.inauka.ru/discovery/article35236.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070813035909/http://www.amursk.ru/az/05/1130/r2.htm to http://www.amursk.ru/az/05/1130/r2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051228031353/http://www.adm.khv.ru/invest2.nsf/edd578ced75448e2ca256524001a00c2/6ea7ef189fc9473fca25665100159738?OpenDocument to http://adm.khv.ru/invest2.nsf/edd578ced75448e2ca256524001a00c2/6ea7ef189fc9473fca25665100159738?OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I tried http://khabarovskadm.ru/   and it never loaded for me.--Billymac00 (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link no good? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Khabarovsk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817181236/http://hbr.moigorod.ru/news/details.asp?n=2146407918 to http://hbr.moigorod.ru/news/details.asp?n=2146407918
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I doubt that "Before 1860, this was a typical Chinese city, with more than 50% Han residents." can be true. There's no evidences and proofs that shortly before 1860 inside of current borders of the city there was something which can be called a city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andruhon (talk • contribs) 11:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese early dynasties 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: In my recent edit, I deleted an uncited claim in the lead section that called Khabarovsk Russia's easternmost city. I found this claim strange and dubious at best, since there are places such as Komsomolsk-on-Amur east of Khabarovsk which meet both the common English definition of a "city" and the Russian definition of "город".
If I'm missing something here and you'd like to reinstate that claim, please write it in a clearer and more accurate way, and cite it if possible. 
Spudslover (talk) 03:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. Maybe if it meant above a certain population (500,000?) but it still seems strange to include. Mellk (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Easternmost city?