Talk:Craton

message: Can anyone make a replacement for the second image on this page?  No offense to its creator, but it appears unprofessional and not very legible. --Gadren 00:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of Second Image 

message: To conform to Wiki Manual of Style, would it be better to link the "cratonization" process to a separate article? I don't think the article, nor the subject, has the depth or complexity to justify two articles. They're too closely related of a subject.Valich 07:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think because they are so closely related that the previous version was better, where "cratonization" was in a labeled section which separated the process from the "definition" and "listing" sections.  The explanation of the creation of cratons can also help people to understand details which are not apparent in the short definition.  (SEWilco 07:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Craton vs. the process of cratonization 

message: (moved to Talk from article by SEWilco 15:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamilton is minority view 

message: My comment here is similar to those expressed in the previous section on Hamilton's paper. In particular, the discussion of craton formation reads as if the processes are well defined and well understood. In reality, this problem is very poorly understood. It would really help if the Formation section were revised to match the Wikipedia standard: "encyclopedic information that can be verified by external sources".  --MuTau (talk) 17:07, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formation section is not up to Wikipedia standards 

message: The age was just changed. I understand that craton age isn't really defined. Many use it for large Proterozoic provinces, but its usage can often be closer to the present: the Grand Canyon sequence of sedimentary rocks is, for example, the "cratonal sequence". I'm going to remove the age, and just keep the part that it's stable continent, and often old. Awickert (talk) 08:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: Could someone make a diagram of a vertical cross section of a craton?  I think it would help comprehension of the covnept (at least, I hope it would help mine).  RJFJR (talk) 20:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vertical cross section

message: Does it rhyme with "Chiffon" (as in the margarine) or with Dayton? Or neither? swain (talk) 19:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pronounced krah-taw-n. Penguin2006 (talk) 11:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Alpine peridotites don't seem to have much to do with cratons.  I've removed that sentence.SBaker43 (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpine peridotites 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Craton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060514104020/http://www.the-conference.com/JConfAbs/4/140.html to http://www.the-conference.com/JConfAbs/4/140.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified