Talk:Atul Chitnis

message: The article has been nominated for deletion and the discussion can be viewed here.
The deletion discussion (2nd nomination) has been moved from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Chitnis (second nomination) to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Chitnis (2nd nomination) as a house keeping act. The redirect from second nomination to 2nd nomination has been tagged for deletion. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 11:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion 

message: I have protected this article because of the edit dispute surrounding it. Please work out all differences on this talk page. And while I am not supporting any particular edit or version of the article, I would like to hear Zamkudi's reasons for repeatedly deleting the vast majority of this article. While WP:BLP does permit the immediate removal of unsourced negative info, unsourced neutral or positive material is generally not removed in bulk from an article (and not all of the removed info was unsourced). I should add, though, that Zamkudi does not appear to have gutted the article prior to the AfD (as another user claimed on AN) and likewise, all sides in this edit dispute appear to be operating in good faith. So let's keep everything civil.--Alabamaboy 12:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edi dispute 

message: Removed this CSD, because the article doesn't qualify for CSD. It has already survived a deletion discussion. utcursch | talk 12:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSD 

message: Hi all, I was involved in cleaning up this article in 2006 through my  role in the cleanup taskforce. Atul asked me by email to come back and look at it in light of the recent excisions. Ideally sources can be found for much of the content that Vivekvc has removed and much of the content that JFHJr has tagged citation-needed. Anyone who doesn't want to edit the article themselves (this particularly includes Atul) is welcome to use this space to propose citations for particular facts, and I will add them to the article. Canderson7 (talk) 06:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced some content that was removed previously, some likely for WP:BLPSPS reasons, other stuff I'm not sure why. I didn't find the BLPSPS to involve issues of third parties or self-serving (notability) claims, so I didn't see a reason to exclude or even tag them. Another cite that was removed did indeed provide reliable coverage to the subject, and spoke to his professional activities, and wasn't self-serving at all. (See also WP:NNC) I'm glad Canderson started this section, and I hope others can find more reliable references to improve the content here. JFHJr (㊟) 08:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Hi, Vivekvc. Thank you for re-checking those links and for your attention to this article. Adding those citations to the intro paragraph (as you did here) is not an acceptable way to repair the damage that you did with you erroneous edits. The intro paragraph of a Wikipedia article is not the best place for citations. The intro paragraph should summarize content from the body of the article that is cited in the body of the article. At the time that you removed the citations from the article, they were being used to support sentences and paragraphs in the body of the article. You removed those sentences and paragraphs. You should return to the article history and restore the body-content that you removed in your erroneous edits. Canderson7 (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be bold and revert all the edits in question. It's a wide net, but removal of neutral content regarding living persons should be undertaken with care. Given the sheer multiplicity of edits in a short time frame, any editor will be disinclined to trawl through to parse invalid removal from fair removal. I'm aware of WP:ROWN, and that there are WP:NODEADLINEs, but I agree with Canderson, believe that position rests in policy and consensus, and bear in mind that this subject is a living person. I don't doubt certain edits were reasonable; I hope Vivekvc will consider redoing only those. JFHJr (㊟) 08:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving citations 

message: *Rest in Peace !
*http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/internet/FOSS-IN-founder-Atul-Chitnis-dies/articleshow/20420265.cms --Bhadani (talk) 03:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RIP

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Atul Chitnis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202094235/http://pcquest.ciol.com:80/content/search/showarticle.asp?artid=101682 to http://pcquest.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle.asp?artid=101682
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513102009/http://linux-bangalore.org/2004/ to http://linux-bangalore.org/2004/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Atul Chitnis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513102009/http://linux-bangalore.org/2004/ to http://linux-bangalore.org/2004/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Atul Chitnis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130619093309/http://www.dqindia.com/dataquest/news/189512/remembering-atul-chitnis to http://www.dqindia.com/dataquest/news/189512/remembering-atul-chitnis
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified