lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Polish Immortal

message: it is possible to provide a discussion and analysis of the more complex moves to the less expereienced players? 
also would it be possible for a page to be made offering a directory of famous games?
*The only directory we have is provided by the category :Category:Chess games.  You'll find a few other famous games there, although we should add some more.  Analysis of this and the other games would be good, but we have to base it on published analysis because of WP:NOR (an excellent policy). 165.189.91.148 15:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: According to http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1100774 the game took place in 1929, not in 1935. Which one is correct? <- yeah...
:I would prefer that we used the "official" date until it's assured that it happened in a different year than 1935. Fetofs Hello! 20:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the article to reflect that. Fetofs Hello! 00:21, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Game date

message: I've put a diagram on the page, but I'm not sure which position to get displayed there. Is it the beginning of the attack (Bxh2!) or the move that has two exclamation marks (Bg1!!)? Fetofs Hello! 20:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer a diagram after ...Bg1 as this is really the sacrifice move. ...Bxh2+ is not a sacrifice as if White plays Kxh2 Black wins the piece back with ...Ng4+ 91.105.50.10 04:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram
Talk:Voiceless retroflex affricate

message: In Russian there is no voiceless retroflex affricate because the voiceless affricate is always palatalized. -Iopq 23:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! Thanks for catching that. kwami 00:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian

message: In Ukrainain it rather t͡ʃ - a palato-alveolar affricate
--176.38.165.113 (talk) 09:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ukrainian

message: Ligatures for dʐ (U+AB66) and tʂ (U+AB67) were recently added to Unicode 12.0. I’m not sure if they can be described as “obsolete”, since they were never used in any official IPA publication, but there was enough evidence of their use in Chinese dialectology for there to have been a strong case for their inclusion in Unicode. Should footnote 1 be updated to reflect this, or are they not notable enough? 189.197.235.85 (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typographical ligatures 

message: I wonder if anyone can provide a source that any natural language has a subapical affricate. Wikipedia should include articles for sounds that at least used by some languages, not something like "bite your tongue hard" sound. I tried to produce a subapical affricate - although it is articulatable but in order to make it not resulting into a stop I have to blow a verybstrong airflow, which almost immediately hurt my tongue. 
An apical retroflex stop is already unstable enough to be very easily evolved into an affricate, while a laminal stop is hard enough to articulate so that it almost immediately result into an affricate. A subapical affricate is something totally in different world. --146.96.25.46 (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subapical, seriously?! 

message: See Talk:Voiceless retroflex affricate#Subapical, seriously?!. Symbols like [ʈ͡ʂ] shouldn't be used unless there are diacritics explicitly telling the articulation. If unspecified, the strict IPA should be [t̠͡ʂ] not [ʈ͡ʂ]. Subapical [ʈ͡ʂ] is definitely a possible phone but articulates more like a knuckle cracking with one's tongue (I found it a harmful act) and is unlikely to present in human languages (not reported anyway). 146.96.36.74 (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No subapical plosive symbol should be universally used
Talk:Capricorn Energy

message: I would like to delete the refernce to the North Sea as part of there company operations, they do not operate in the north sea anymore (if they did ever?), solely in India, Nepal and Bangeldesh. Thanks Philbentley 23:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You can't bring in information from your own notes to Wikipedia.  All articles have to be written based on information from other verifiable sources.  i.e. you have to provide links to your sources.Kgrr 16:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Links are not the only form of verification.  References to published books are certainly acceptable, for example. RJFJR 05:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research 

message: The article is full of spelling and gramatical errors.  Also some things are left unexplained such as the September 2005 reshuffle - what exactly does this mean??
This needs to be cleaned up.Kgrr 16:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: There are many claims in this article such as strategy and image.  How do you know what the company's strategy is without proof?  Did they tell you?  Did some pundit say it in an article?  bring references to these sources and put them in the article.Kgrr 16:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not verified 

message: *I removed the long unverified POV claims.  Sources will be required to re-add this material.  Wickethewok 17:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removal
Talk:The Dragon Reborn

message: Was that really so popularly believed?  Even if it was, you would think after all this time that not too many people would still believe that.  Sure, Rand had to deal with possible madness, but that's a far cry from being Satan.  If anything, Shai'tan is the Satan figure in the series.  BPMoldovan 00:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh. Never heard that one; I cleaned up the language a bit, but without a source, I'm liable to argue for removing it entirely. At this point it's a note of minor curiosity, at best. nae'blis (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rand is Satan?

message: "All admit to a slight longing, however.  Not for more Rand viewpoints specifically, but a longing to know him better.  The man whom we read about at the beginning of this book has changed a lot since the end of the second book.  That progress, that change, is trapped between books, lost to us.  A friend recently explained to me that Mr. Jordan looked at Rand's changes during this book as a metaphor for the way he himself changed during his years in Vietnam.  That same friend suggested that maybe showing those changes explicitly might have been to close to home for Mr. Jordan.  I'd never heard that before, but it makes a whole lot of sense." "WoT Read Through: THE DRAGON REBORN"
Given the source, this strikes me as sufficiently authoritative to put into the somewhat flabby section on Rand's absence. --Gwern  (contribs) 02:06 11 November 2008 (GMT)
:Brandon Sanderson's website certainly seems a reliable enough source.  I'd be OK with putting it in.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 12:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rand & Vietname
Talk:Handsome Lake

message: While it appears that many if not most in the Longhouse follow the Code of Handsome Lake, some feel that it does great harm to the original Great Law.
see:
TRADITIONAL CULTURE AND COMMUNITY COMPETITION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ON-GOING STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE GREAT LAW AND THE CODE OF HANDSOME LAKE IN KAHNAWAKE
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Qureus1 09:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is meant by, "most in the Longhouse" ?
Most in the longhouse attend ceremonies of the Hodenosaunee, rather than recite the Code of Hansome Lake. The Great Law and the Code of Handsome Lake are not the same thing. The Great Law is the political structure of the Hodenosaunee. The Code of Handsome lake is a religion or Theology, that followers look to for guidance on decision making. Political structures can be greatly harmed by religious followers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.187.137 (talk) 03:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Law vs. Code of Handsome Lake

message: I would like to add an internal link to this page that would direct readers to the page, How America was Discovered, which I am currently working on. I feel that the two articles have similarities as well as being spoken by Handsome Lake. Alexisyos (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: Arthur Parker's The Code of Handsome Lake is an outdated source. According to Thomas Abler, author of Cornplanter: Chief Warrior of the Allegany Senecas, Handsome Lake and his half-brother Cornplanter were born as members of the Wolf Clan. Both this article and the article on Cornplanter have been corrected. Griffin's Sword (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clan
Talk:Narrow Street

message: "The first reference to the house being used for sale of alcohol occurs at beginning of the 18th century. From 1787-97 the name is recorded as the Bunch of Grapes but from the 1850s it was just known as The Grapes.Charles Dickens knew this public house and it is said to be the original of the fictional Jolly Fellowship Porters. As The Porters was described as being much larger, the Prospect of Whitby is another candidate as is the now demolished Two Brewers, Limehouse. The fictional inn may in fact be an amalgam of various riverside taverns".
http://www.portcities.org.uk/london/server/show/conMediaFile.7042/The-Grapes-Narrow-Street-Limehouse.html
(fidget2006 23:47, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the 1827 map (Narrowstreet1827.jpg) is correct then Limehouse Bridge Dock is not 'now Limehouse Basin' as suggested here. Limehouse Basin (at one stage called the Regent's Canal Dock) is shown on the 1827 map ('Basin'), and Limehouse Bridge Dock can be seen on the 1827 map just below where the Limehouse Cut then reached the Thames. Pterre 23:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've sorted that one out. hth Kbthompson (talk) 18:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

text: "The Narrow" is in the former Dockmaster's House - difficult to see how this could have been the brewery. Although, it might have been built on site of ... Kbthompson (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Asteria (mythology)

message: Perhaps these should be articles?  Since they're not now, I'm removing them from the dab page.  Also, external links don't belong in the body of an article anyway, but in an external links section, and not on dab pages at all.  MoS:DP
* Award-winning medieval duo singing "meltingly beautiful" songs of passion and despair from the 15th century: le souvenir de vous me tue.
* An emo/pop band based out of Indiana ... named by Midwest Beat Magazine staff and readers as Most Promising New Artists and Favorite New Artists for 2004.
* A telecommunications consulting company specializing in Asterisk PBX integration services, based in Huntsville, Alabama. Asteria Solutions Group Telephone: 256.705.0277
Tedernst | talk 23:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: removed entries

message: Now that the above are deleted, the rest is about mythology, except the star stone.  And nothing links to any articles about Asteria.  Perhaps this should be an article about the mythology of Asteria? Tedernst | talk 23:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: is this really a dab?

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Spartina

message: We propose to start the Spartina alterniflora page to describe its
biology and impacts as an invasive species as seen in California. 
Please add information from other regions.  We will post on Dec. 9,
2005, along with adding a link on the Cordgrass page and a smooth
cordgrass pointer page to Spartina alterniflora.--PBG250 23:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd think the first para "The greatest problems derive from ...." (which mentions several species but primarily S. anglica) would be better retained here or moved to the S. anglica page; the other para I'd agree with the move to the S. alterniflora page - MPF 22:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tiger Army

message: I thought their first self-titled album was released in 1999. It says 1997 on the article? --Hotdoglives 08:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First album

message: I've heard it told that Nick 13 and Davey Havok went to the same high school in California.  Any truth to this?--DMhessian17 9:01, 10 March 2006
It is true
Ukiah High School.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.47.197.235 (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anecdotes

message: I've made a fair number of edits to this page over the past few hours. I've just put up an Infobox and removed the "Members" section, as it was redundant. Mnesimache 01:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I just edited the Releases section, putting Tiger Army's releases into a table, akin to those found at AFI or VNV Nation. Mnesimache 01:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables 

message: In my opinion, it isn't really accurate to be referring to Tiger Army as psychobilly anymore given their musical shift away from that kind of music. Not sure what It should be changed to, but something to think about. 6/2/07
:They have had a musical shift between their 3rd and 4th albums, but I would still consider some of their songs Psychobilly, such as "Ghosts of Memory", "Pain", or "Afterworld". And even if they stopped playing any psychobilly music, the infobox should still have "psychobilly" in it under genres, because they were once psychobilly. CrayZsaaron 21:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not psychobilly? 

message: There's a song of there's on disk two of Epitaph's Punk-O-Rama vol. 8 called "Incorporeal". Could someone put that on the Compilations table? I don't know much about editing tables.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.179.24.216 (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compilations 

message: The band played their first show at the famous 924 Gilman Street venue in Berkeley, California, with AFI on March 29, 1976
Neither band existed in 1976. Anyone who knows the history of the band want to change the date on this?  Red dwarf (talk) 22:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First show 

message: These sources do not belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning! I didn't check them to see if they follow criteria per WP policy, so be careful in choosing any potential references I've moved here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 20:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources do not belong in External links, but they DO belong here...
Talk:List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force minor characters

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate to name this article, "Minor Characters from Aqua Teen Hunger Force," rather than, "Minor characters from Aqua Teen Hunger Force"? ZachPG 22:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CAPS seems to suggest otherwise. The word "characters" is not a proper noun, and thus should not be capitalized. :: ZJH (T C E) 13:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Why did we bring this list back? There isn't enough real-world information to support this article. Kamek (Koopa wizard!) 18:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list
Talk:Chanctonbury Ring

message: This looks like more than a stub to me. Could the "This is a stub" bit at the bottom be removed?
I remember visiting about five years before the Great Storm and distinctly remember identifying the trees which were then well over 150 feet tall as lime trees. I also vaguely remember reading elsewhere that they were definitely lime trees. I don't think beech trees ever grow that tall or look that imposing. These were giants and I am almost certain they were limes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.156.164 (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub 

message: there was writing in the 7th century BCE.  --142.163.194.123 (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in the British Isles! The prehistoric era ended at different times in different places. Prioryman (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "prehistoric"? 

message: I added a new section for it, because the ring features in one of my favourite books. Though only fans of the girls' school story genre may have heard of an old and obscure novel like that. Anyone know of any other novels, poems etc, that feature the place?̂LavenderAlice (talk) 11:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular culture
Talk:Swimfan

message: Are you sure that's the tagline? I thought it was 'Hold your breath' Lochok 00:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was 'His biggest fan just became his worst nightmare'. :) 86.135.178.184 17:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagline
Talk:Anton Flettner

message: The portion on rotor ships is really disingenuous. It quotes Popular Science - never a very reliable source about the impact of proposed technology - from 1925. We certainly have not seen this amazing revolutionary technology reshape the world of shipping... He simply failed when he tried.
The fact that it appears to have promise and is being tried in a few ships suggests he might have really been onto something, but it's simply novel at this point, not yet revolutionary... There's been no revolution. Fitzhugh (talk) 06:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to edit the page but the gee-whiz treatment of this topic in the introduction does not meet any sort of encyclopedic standards, especially since the outsized 1925 Popular Science claims have not been substantiated by actual experimentation with a modern rotary sail ship. Much more modest power savings are reported. As per the obvious, the technology would be dominant if there were not attendant disutilities. 0x69494411 18:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another article written by misguided fanboy?
Talk:Carcinus maenas

message: We propose to add a section titled "Non Indigenous Range" and to add 
information to the "Ecology" and "C. maenas as an invasive species" 
section.--PBG250 00:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reference doesn't match up to the link... (Sorry if this isn't the right way to post this!) PJFraser (talk) 16:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing it out – now fixed! --Stemonitis (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference 6

message: Is it just me or is it missing a leg?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.232.26 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture
Talk:Cariboo (provincial electoral district)

message: Just wondering: d'you think there's any connection between the Jeremie Louis LeBourdais cited as a Green then independent candidate in Cariboo in 1983/1986, and this Jerry Le Bourdais? Ground Zero | t 00:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Michael Coren

message: A "My Toronto" blog item in the National Post website, apparently by Michael Coren   claims certain elements of this Wikipedia article are/were in error. Some evaluation of that blog is needed, to determine whether that feature of the National Post is WP:RS or not. Meanwhile, I corrected the lede to conform to his CFRB bio (Toronto residence rather than Oshawa, four children) and removed the unsourced claim of his wife's occupation. However, the article material needs a more thorough review and more eyeballs than what I can provide at the moment. Dl2000 (talk) 04:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims of article errors from a National Post blog

message: Coren has never been jewish so despite the penchant for roman catholics to relish in defections from judaism he never was as jewishness eminates from the mothers side  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.130.56 (talk) 06:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Corens Jewishness

message: I'm sorry, but this talk page was a disgrace - if anyone wants to categorise these old entries, feel free; but they were all over the place (including above the talk page's header) and needed somewhere to go.  I don't think the page is long enough that it needs to be archived. Mkubica (talk) 01:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not valid to get from that quote an "equating" of homosexuality with bestiality or necrophilia. All he says is that they were all considered wrong by 1st Century Judaism (undeniably true). That's not saying they are "equal". DJ Clayworth (talk) 18:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Talk Page Entries 
Talk:Posthumus Zone

message: We should consider merging this article with the main article for the artist.  There really isn't enough content to justify having two pages at this point. Peteresch 00:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose this - a short article doesn't mean it should be deleted, and this jingle is too well-known.  E.S. Posthumus is far too broad an article to merge this into.  It's possible we could merge this into the album that contains it, like Bananaphone.  --AySz88^-^ 04:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like there is a lot of precendent for giving well known themes their own articles.  (Summon the Heroes, Call of the Champions, Olympic Fanfare and Theme) Peteresch 17:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that this rises to the level of Summon the Heroes, perhaps if there was more information available it could stand on its own. As it is, I don't see any information here that isn't already duplicated on E.S. Posthumus or NFL on CBS, (though admittedly the NFL on CBS page is a bit ugly at the moment). I understand the point made by AySz88, but unless there is unique information here, there really is no point. -- RoninBK  T C   20:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidate Articles
Talk:Kyuukyuu Sentai GoGoFive

message: Just so you know Power Rangers personal information should not be posted on Super Sentai page other than what PR show that are based off each of. The same goes for writing Sentai Characters and other information that is not relevent to that PR article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.153.45 (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Power Rangers characters

message: Was there any reason at all for removing the information about the mecha, that's a pretty important bit being a sentai and all. If there isn't a good reason it should be put back.
Don't worry the Mecha section was moved to the Tatsumi Family page. -Adv193 02:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mecha Removal 

message: Why is the trivia removed from this page? A lot of it contained rare, interesting behind the scenes material. DappuDappu 10:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it’s “rare” as in not discussed in reliable sources, it doesn’t belong in this project. And whether you think it’s interesting is irrelevant. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 05:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia