Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/AirFrance358

message: ::Look, you're the main "disruptive edit warrior" from your party but you're speaking as if you're a third person.  That's a false. You've been criticized for you as a "disruptive POV editor" by the other party for a long time. That's why you've always accused of a sockpuppet master. You shouldn't forget about yourself. And I'm no relevant to whatever the Arbcom remedies suggested to you. Please don't drag the irrelevant case of your involvement to this report. I didn't even participated in the Liancourt article until Nov. (If I knew it I would throw my vote against for the name change of Dokdo. However, I will look at it what it is. And didn't I repeatedly suggest you to make differs? I don't mind being checked out. I even pasted the the same contents ahead of you in order to end your accusation. And look into who initiated the edit warring? Your party. I need to narrow down the above cases.--Appletrees (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Accused by whom?  By a banned user  in Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Komdori?  How did you know about that?  The jury is still out as to whether Appletrees is related to the others.--Endroit (talk) 18:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple. A sock of Bason0 left a desperate comment to accuse some Japanese people at WP:KO talk page. He has quite lots of socks (He made the splendid puppet shows!). I looked through almost every his RFCU, and SSP files as I traced down disruptive ip odn anons and several users's contribution history. I've prepared to make my files for one month. You're confirmed "unrelated to most of people on my list" but there is a high possibility whether you're related to someone. But unfortunately, your cases were mostly rejected.--Appletrees (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Read WP:BATTLE.--Endroit (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but you should've not said that I might know the remedies which was imposed to you. Everybody can't know what you know.--Appletrees (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Appletrees, you have basically admitted to being inspired by a banned user Bason0.  You are advised not to carry on his personal battles in Wikipedia, per WP:BATTLE.--Endroit (talk) 19:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Endroit, you know of many wiki rules and are really a long-time wikipedian. But why don't you practice the policy for yourself instead of making disruptive edit warrings with many people? That's why you're not the right person to chide me. Of course, I should read and learn many wiki guidelines. Unfortunately, I've learn the useful rules step by step from these experiences. What we really need is a discussion with verifiable sources to reach a consensus. The banned user is deserved to be banned but his desperate scream got into my attention.And please lower down your oppressive tone because with that, your speech sounds implausible. Please be civil as possible.--Appletrees (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Endroit, you must not falsely assume or accuse me again that I carried out the banned user's battle. I'm no interest in edit wars on behalf of his grudge. I just got to know that you're not that good editor per his record, but my case focuses on KoreanShoriSenyou and odn.ip users. --Appletrees (talk) 20:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Haha, I knew you would do that :D So, are you claiming that I am "recruited" by these people for supporting one opinion or performing a sockpuppetry without any evidence? Well, that's why you have accused so many innocent editors of sockpupptry in the past if they don't follow your standard. I need to become your friend soon for my safety. Keep up the good work. (oh, really)--Appletrees (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Jjok, Thatcher is the same checkuser who examined my two reports. He already saw them. You're late.--Appletrees (talk) 18:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I put the above text here in a wrong place and I was moving it to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou but I will copy it. In addition, the memo is not only for admins but for other related editors and myself.--Jjok (talk) 18:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry for the removal of the hidden chinilpa sock pipeline, because the term is explicitly used for some Korean people who aided the Japanese government during the Japanese occupation. You might know that per your devotion to Korean history related articles but why deliberately inserted it? You're neither Korean nor old man who undergone the period. Anyway, this file is soon to be merged to Amazonfire case. --Appletrees (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion moved from main page