Talk:Ali al-Akbar ibn Husayn

message: 1. KazakhPol you cannot revert the page without discussing the matter first on the discussion page. I wrote the article that you reverted and I don’t understand the reason of your action. KazakhPol please don’t not revert a page in future before discussing the matter on the talk page first. Thank You Salman 18:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look carefully at the history of the page, you will see that unlike KazakhPol who apparently reverts the article without fixing the blatant errors therein, I had not removed any of your content (apart from the pointless addition of Urdu text). I have only cleaned up some errors, and added a sources required tag. SmackBot just dated the sources required tag. At the same time, the article is a mess, and needs to be fixed up. Sources need to be cited, and it needs to be written in a NPOV tone. Park3r 09:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really appreciate you Park3r for listening to me. Please indicate in the article, the sentence or paragraph for which you want the citation for. I will be more then happy to get the sources for you. Also please indicate the word(s), sentence(s), or paragraph(s), that you think is not written from a NPOV, and I will be glad to fix it for you. Let’s work together and try our best to fix the article, instead of reverting it back to a smaller article. I will be waiting for your reply. Thank You Salman 19:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It reads like a hagiography. For example He was a handsome young man of eighteen. is not objective. If you said According to the Muslim scholar [Insert name of Scholar], he was a handsome young man of eighteen [when he was killed, or whatever] [and then cited your source] it would be better. The sentences in the introduction need cleaning up. How about quotation marks around the Hussein Bin Ali quote? I haven't got time to go through the article, but it's pretty obvious that there is a lot of work that needs to be done. Park3r 15:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay Park3r, how about this, I am reverting the article and tell me for which word(s), sentence(s), or paragraph(s) you want citations. I will provide you with citations. I wrote this article and I still have the books with me that I used to write this article, so I am reverting the article so you can help me cite some of the word(s), sentence(s), or paragraph(s). Thank You Salman 19:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but that is not acceptable. Paragraphs like the one: Let us pause briefly to remind ourselves of an incident in the seventh Hijrah... don't belong in an encyclopedia (and have nothing to do with the subject of the article). I tried to salvage some of "your" material, but you don't own the article, and I will be undoing your revert. I don't want to become part of the revert war, but I think I'm beginning to understand why it arose. Park3r 21:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cool man, I still disagree with you but I think I have no other way than to rewrite the whole article. Later Salman 00:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting the page

message: What’s up with Park3r? I don’t really understand what Park3r is trying to do. Park3r just keeps on tagging Muslims articles and sys that they are stories. I have given reference(s) and source(s) to each and every single quote I have written on wikipedia.org. I don’t know how to explain him, Park3r just doesn’t understand or doesn’t want to understand. Salman 19:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. You both had the time to criticize me, but neither of you had the five minutes it took fix the article's problems. KazakhPol 20:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging

message: This article is about the same individual as Ali Akbar ibn Hussain, and therefore only one should exist. I don't know what spelling is better, and I'd prefer someone more knowledgeable with the subject perform the merge.-Andrew c [talk] 01:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not believe they are the same person, actually - both are said to be one of the three sons of Husayn Ibn Ali, but both are also mentioned as brothers of each other, and all three brother names apparently contained 'Ali'.  Their dates of birth are also different, and the one was a babe when he died while the other was older.  I therefore removed the merge request again; I hope I understood they situation correctly.  --Leviel 11:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: :Image:Zari of Hazrat Ali Akbar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 16:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Zari of Hazrat Ali Akbar.jpg

message: I  added some sources and fix npov problems of the article.M1nhm (talk) 08:32, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding sources 

message: I improved the article and added more reliable sources. Also, I tried to resolve the issues mentioned. Now we can remove the  Confusing tag. M1nhm (talk) 09:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just read the article.  The dates of his birth are inconsistent.  He is supposed to have been only 18 years old when he died at the Battle of Karbala which took place in October 680 CE. Yet the article states he was born around 652 CE or 654 CE.  Is there anyone who has access to reliable sources to sort this out? Chewings72 (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve the article