lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sarah-Theodora

message: Someone just added more content.  great!  I did a litle cleanup - there is no point for example in including material for which there is no evidence, or saying that the sources do not address something; we should focus on what we do know, not what we do not.
i am also removing from the article the following:
:There is an old legend saying that the Tsar accidentally saw her and fell in love with her while she was bathing in the Yantra river. The reliability of this source is dubious. More credit should probably be given to the version that Ivan Alexander saw her during a trial and fell in love with her immediately. Whatever the truth is, he proposed to her, causing a scandal within the court: first, his elected bride was a Jew; second, he was already married; third, her humble parentage could hardly match the noble lineage of the Tsar himself. Anyway, the marriage took place despite all difficulties. 
This material may have merit, which is why I did not delete it.  But we can't really keep it int the article as is.  These claims need to be supported by reliable sources, and we need to know who holds these views.  Purely as a matter of style, I would not use "Anyway" in an encyclopedia article, I don't think it reads very well.  Can we learn more about the historical research that supportes this stuff?  Are the views significant?  Are the sources reliable? Slrubenstein   |  Talk 02:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  text removed from article
Talk:Imbi

message: Imbi is not an actual neighbourhood or district in Kuala Lumpur. The only official recognisation of any place dubbed "Imbi" in the city is a road that passes the southern end of Bukit Bintang (as Imbi Road/Jalan Imbi). Neither does Imbi have its own postcode as neighbouring Bukit Bintang and Pudu do. Even if you like to write about the road, there isn't much context in it to merit its own article aside the fact that it passes several notable landmarks. Since the road is located between the jurisdictions of Bukit Bintang and Pudu, it's only appropriate to merge this article with that of Bukit Bintang or Pudu.
The misconception could have resulted from a monorail station and shopping centre that simply reference the road in part as "Imbi". - Two hundred percent 08:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge, as per 200% --Zack2007 14:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: The same argument is being brought up at the Dang Wangi article. - Two hundred percent 06:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imbi is not an actual place
Talk:Ben Wilson (basketball)

message: I find it hard to believe that he carried 239 lbs on that lanky frame of his.  That's more than most NBA centers weighed at the time.  He had more of a Reggie Miller physique.  Most sources have him listed at 185 lbs. http://www.facebook-statistics.com/page/Ben-Benji-Wilson-Jr--Tribute-to-a-Basketball-Legend/4839587 Aoa8212 (talk) 10:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  239 Lbs? 

message: This section of the article really needs to be re-written using reliable sources. Right now it seems as if the section is sourced almost entirely from someone's watching of the ESPN 30 for 30 film Benji, as it reports as fact and without citation statements made by people appearing in that film, and the few citations given towards the end contradict much of what is said before (i.e. it describes, as fact, that he was shot due to bumping into and then further provoking the shooter, whereas most articles and the verdict of the case describe the shooting as having been part of a robbery attempt.). Given the fact that many of these statements are contradictory to what other sources say, I think that their being stated as fact in Wikipedia's voice on this page is somewhat inappropriate without proper citations to reliable sources. UnequivocalAmbivalence (talk) 14:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with everything noted in this comment.  The death section is lacking in citations.  Even among sources that meet Wiki standards, there are discrepancies in the accounts depending on the particular people that were interviewed and providing accounts of what they remember happened.  Aside from that, other accounts such as the fight that lead up to him striking a teacher are varying.  Some accounts claimed that he had grabbed his girlfriend and was yelling at her which led to a teacher intervening.  Other accounts claim that it was a fight with another student.  Given that most of these stories are based on varying accounts provided by different friends and family members, which may be reluctant to provide information which may cast the subject in a negative light; I'd question the accuracy of any account used a source.  VeraBaby (talk) 12:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on his death needs sources and re-writing
Talk:Kampung Baru, Kuala Lumpur

message: There appear to be divisive political issues affecting this town, and opinions are presented without the needed inline citations in the history section and elsewhere. The article's tone seems partisan and unencyclopedic as a result. Attribute opinions to some speaker or newspaper, not as the encyclopedia saying some development scheme is bad in some way. Edison (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag
Talk:Benny Lynch

message: I'm confused. If he was over the bantamweight limit, presumably he was not permitted to fight Jurich for the flyweight title. And if, somehow he did fight Jurich, and stopped him in the 12th, why did Jurich get the title. And in this case, surely Lynch's excess weight would have been an advantage, so there's no "despite" about it. Matthau (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lynch won, Jurich claimed the title due to Lynch forfeiting it, but had no valid claim. --Michig (talk) 21:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Jurich fight

message: I can't find any evidence for the existence of a 2003 film about Lynch, certainly not one involving Robert Carlyle (who is slim but would still have had to lose a hell of a lot of weight to play the part). What was it called? Was it ever released? Anyone? Matthau (talk) 14:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Documentary narrated by Carlyle - source now in article. --Michig (talk) 21:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Film?
Talk:Lembah Pantai

message: Syed Jaymal Zahiid | Feb 21, 08 12:18pm Kuala Lumpur PKR youth chief Md Zaman Md Tasi claimed that about 30 resident association chairpersons in the area have been offered generous ‘goodies’ by Shahrizat who is also women, family and community development minister. He alleged that holiday packages to various destinations like South Korea, China and Indonesia have been offered. "She claimed that her voters are loyal to her. Of course they are when you keep handing out goodies every time elections near," said Zaman. Zaman claimed he found out about the matter through one resident association chairperson who was supposedly offered the trip but had refused to take it as the person felt it was unethical to do so. He informed Zaman that a staff from Shahrizat’s office in Bangsar Utama known only as ‘Ani’ had contacted him numerous times to offer him the trip. No housing for squatters yet Sri Pahang flats area in Bangsar Utama residents also told Malaysiakini that the Lembah Pantai MP has been handing out gift hampers and cash amounting to RM50-RM100. Residents say the gift hampers and cash were meant for senior citizens and the physically challenged in the area. "She would always come down here during the festive season and provide the residents with gifts, especially for senior citizens," said a senior citizen who declined to reveal her name. Zaman felt that the poor residents in Lembah Pantai have hidden grouses but were afraid to voice their concerns against the BN government. "Like the squatters in Pantai Dalam, they have been promised proper housing for so long by Shahrizat but untill now, no proper housing have been provided. They dare not say anything for fear that if they do so, they will be denied of their houses", he said. Zaman also said that Shahrizat have brought development in the constituency only for the well-to-do and not the poor. He argued that the poor are only loyal to her because of her hand-outs. The Lembah Pantai constituency is a Malay-majority area with 53.2 percent followed by Chinese 25.7 percent and Indian 20.1 percent. Shahrizat has been the incumbent for the Lembah Pantai for three terms. She is expected to face Puteri Reformasi Nurul Izzah Anwar in the March 8 polls.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.53.46.209 (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lembah Pantai: Holiday trips, cash for residents 
Talk:Shah dynasty

message: Could someone rewrite the 'Abolishment' section? It seems to be taken from the BBC article. Because of this, I removed it. - Thanks, Hoshie 05:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abolishment section 

message: Hi there. I've made some small corrections and I'll come back to improve references if I can. Regards, Myrtle.Myrtlegroggins (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:South Australian Film Corporation

message: All versions of this article appeared to be a copyright violation lifted from . So I have deleted the article. If someone wishes to write a new article which does not violate copyright, they are most welcome to. Sarah 12:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: 57 Films and Qingdao TV are growing and could have own pages on wikipedia. Would like to draft pages for them, have red links to them here for now. thank you EricPfromTustin (talk) 19:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film companies
Talk:Wayamba University of Sri Lanka

message: Some or all of this may come from the University website.  For exanple, [www.wyb.ac.lk/history.html this page] on the history might be copied based on Google searching.  The website appears to inaccessible at this point so unable to confirm. -- Whpq 12:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it to me, I have added  Rich257 12:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Copyvio
Talk:Corpus Juris Canonici

message: The name of the main article should be "Corpus Iuris Canonici".  The "Juris" version was only created because there was a problem with weird Unicode characters.  What is the best way to accomplish this name change without losing the history? -- Cat Whisperer 12:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this article 

message: The old "Iuris" article is now merged.  The format I chose was a summary timeline.  I'm open to ideas on how to improve that section. patsw 13:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Discussion

message: I moved the section on the 1983 Codex Iuris Canonici to the article on such code. It seems more appropriate now that there is an article on it.  Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 05:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Section moved to [[1983 Code of Canon Law]]
Talk:Bill Brubaker

message: The baseball card image included with this article is not a picture of Bill Brubaker. Bill Brubaker was my uncle and that’s not him. That picture is from a 1936 Goudy baseball card set that incorrectly identifies the player pictured as Bill Brubaker. For an actual picture of Bill Brubaker see the 1939 Playball card #130. DrBrinegar (talk) 19:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Brubaker image
Talk:Coulsdon Town railway station

message: I'm removing a silly paragraph about changing the name to Andweep, based on this article. Mtford 17:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andweep 

message: Confirmed that the name will change - September 2010.  Not confirmed, so not included on the main page, is the reputed [note 'reputed', only] cost of £200,000. 
Even in this age of austerity, that appears to be rather a lot.  Still, Brown's Bills have to be paid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.177.1 (talk) 19:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Talk:Bill Edrich

message: I was going to edit some of this material into the article but the phrase "famously convivial" seems to sum it all up so succinctly I just don't have the heart to do it.  Still I'm offering up the link just in case you feel you want to include it.
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/current/story/377353.html    johnnybriggs (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 
Talk:Bill Hewitt (American football)

message: Was it Hewitt or Dick Plasman? Cake (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: See here for example. Cake (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The thing about him being the last was there before I got to the article. I just took the previous editor's word for it that it was in that book. But now that you mention it I don't recall seeing anything about him being the last. Just that he was notable for it. I'd imagine there was probably a few players who could claim to be the last. Lizard (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: The last with his hair for a helmet
Talk:Sri Hartamas

message: I have added some images from Wikimedia Commons, but I think they could definitely be improved upon! Roobidy (talk) 11:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos added
Talk:Souvanna Phouma

message: At the present time, the article seems totally inconsistent with the career description in the box at right.  It ends with his resignation in 1958, though the government that replaced him, as per the box, is the one shown as taking over in 1960.  But the box says he regained the prime minister position in 1962 and held it for 13 years. Ajericn (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  After 1958? 
Talk:Taman Tun Dr Ismail

message: I have removed a lot of content that is neither directly nor indirectly related to Taman Tun Dr. Ismail such as the ones hinted by Lycaphim. Added the very first references from non primary sources. Also removed road names of people with non existent Wikipedia pages. Interpreted as not well known Kichimiao (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup of non relevant links and text

message: This page has been a target of vandalism by certain real estate agents/fanboys who repeatedly remove links and text that are constructively critical of this housing area. This needs to be monitored. Kichimiao (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:Ali Iskandar of Johor

message: Noticed Druumbowe made three edits to the "descendants" sections which seperates Sultan Ali of Johor from the "house of Bendahara". He made the following points, from my observations of his edits:
* Sultan Mahmud Muzaffar Shah was the Sultan of the Johor-Riau empire. Based on sources in google books as well as a few books which I personally have from the google book collection, Muzaffar Shah was the de jure head of the original empire, for by the Dutch and British who intervened in the Singapore founding had broken it up into two. See . A History of Johore, by R.O Winstedt, provides a genealogical tree in pg 185 showing Muzaffar Shah as the "Sultan of Lingga". By practice he has authority over Lingga and not over the other parts of the original empire. 
*Seperated Sultan Ali of Johor from the section of "House of Bendahara (Johor)]]. While Sultan Muzaffar was also descendewd from the Bendahara Sultans of Johor-Riau , it was Sultan Hussein who obtained the Johor regalia and hence the legitimacy as the head of the House of Bendahara (Johor). I admit that there was contention between Hussein (later his son Ali) with Muzaffar, as stated in . But again, it was with Sultan Hussein, rather than Muzaffar whom he ruled Johor. By then it was Temenggong Abul Rahman and not the Sultan who had power over Johor-Singapore , but the Temenggong swore allegiance to Hussein and not Muzaffar. 
* As for Sultan Ali of Johor, while Temenggong Ibrahim increasingly took power from the Sultan, but between Sultan Ali and Sultan Muzaffar it was Ali who seen as the legitimate ruler of Johor. As far as I see from the sources, Sultan Muzaffar, was not the head of the House of bendahara (Johor). Also, your edit to claim that "Sultan Ali" as the pretender was not substantiated. I did a book search, and sources explicitely saying that he had no powers was not proven. He did have a little power, and it was with the British which Sultan Ali and not Muzaffar issues dealings with. []
By matter of info, I would sincerely urge that you may be willing to discuss contentious issues so as to resolve any misunderstandings as a matter Wikipedia:Assume good faith through discussion talks, so that we can create an article based on accountable facts Wikipedia:Citing sources. I appreciate your reply, if you find it necessary. Thank you! Mr Tan (talk) 12:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I have made some new edits to Tun Habib Abdul Majid. See the changes--cited. Mr Tan (talk) 13:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Contentious points
Talk:Sultan bin Muhammad Al-Qasimi

message: Interesting problem here. The English spelling of his name in this article is incorrect - his books, for instance, clearly adhere to the convention of Sultan bin Muhammad Al-Qasimi. So how does that get changed? Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the difference. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling 

message: The "Crown Prince" in the infobox should be wrong - it links to a ruler from 1924-51.--MiguelMadeira (talk) 15:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there's no page on the CP, we link to his grandfather. --95.24.65.207 (talk) 23:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crown Prince 
Talk:Sultan bin Saqr Al Qasimi

message: Added a reliable source for the article (British government journals of the time), could we remove the 'no citations' flag?
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

message: Whatever events occured in Berbera, there exists a single (and dubious) assertion by the British that the Al Qasimi roamed as far as the Red Sea. This would presumably belong in the Al Qasimi entry, possibly in the 1809/1819 campaign entries but is irrelevant to Sultan bin Saqr unless there is mention of his personal involvement, which there is not. Any conflict between the British and the local tribes of Berbera did not involve the Al Qasimi and certainly not Sultan bin Saqr. The only ONLY salient fact is that the chiefs wrote him a letter. Any other mention of Berbera is not born up by relevance to Sultan's life or any cited source involving him in events at Berbera. It's pure OR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have to debunk a paragraph that is wholly and entirely irrelevant to the life of Sultan bin Saqr. You have a letter from the Sheikhs to him asking him to declare war in the 1830s (long after your 'Battle of Berbera', a minor conflict that you appear to have taken the lone initiative to award this name). So that information I have happily left in the article. It's a nice detail. However, you have no proof that he was involved in that conflict in any way whatsoever - that he decided to become involved, that he communicated his involvement, that anyone said he was involved or indeed that ANY Al Qasimi force was involved in the brief action between the British and the local sheikhs of Berbera on the 10 and 11 of January 1827. There is literally nothing linking him or the Al Qasimi to this event. Suggest you try and get a Request for Consensus going because you would appear to have the wrong end of the stick here and getting bent out of shape and questioning others' ideals or opinions - the content, not the editor, remember? - is hardly going to serve you well. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Berbera
Talk:Sune Sik

message: (Continued from just above:) I am asking kindly that this be left alone. Readers of this article may not have matters Swedish as clear to themselves as some of our Swedish editors obviously appear to. This is the only prince of Sweden since the year 1000 whose story is so muddled with confusion that any reader here is likely to wonder why. The fire is not mentioned here as a specific link to this confusion but as a very relevant attempt to explain it. It should stay, unless someone can provide a source that refutes the association between the fire and the remarkable lack of archive material from early Swedish history. SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no confusion about Sune Sik - he was a mistake, that was cleared up. The fire has nothing to do with that. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Disregard of discussion = disruptive editing, e.g. (above) "in older historical accounts, was a Swedish prince of doubtful historicity" : 1- You don't mean, I think, that the older accounts doubted him too? 2- The word historicity is too high flying to use in a WP article. This user is known for edit warring and has been warned numerous times. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The account SergeWoodzing started editing five days ago, but is wikilawyering already. Editwarring, uttering sweeping allegations, blabla. Whose sockpuppet are you? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please assume good faith. I (very rarely) edit sv.WP under IP's, never (so far) under this account. This is the only account I use on en.WP. I have talked to other users from sv.WP, but I am the only one commenting here, so that doesn't break WP:SOCK. I am allowed to talk to real people. SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Castle fire 

message: I just want to let all involved editors know that there is currently a thread open at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. I would recommend that everyone involved in this dispute has a look over there, so that we might resolve this matter. I would also request that no one involved in this dispute edits the article until a consensus is reached, as it will just descend into an edit war. Thanks. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Articles (plural) SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit warring by Woodzing, two minutes before this "thank you" - he just assumes that Zippy's request does not apply to him. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute resolution
Talk:Billy Milne

message: In this links (in spanish) there is a cronicle of the final match of the first FAIRS CUP (1955-58) between FC Barcelona and LONDON XI, a selection of london-teams players that represents the city of london (arsenal, chelsea, totenham,etc). In the same cronicle you can read an interview to the manager of LONDON XI, some called "WILLIAM MILSNE" in fact i think is WILLIAM MINE, the spanish journalist says is from arsenal... i tihnk is billy mine in functions of LONDON XI manager.
The journalist says Milne is "assistant of arsenal" and doing "functions of manager of LONDON XI" during the Fairs Cup... some to add to honours of Billy Milne.
Sorry for my totally crap english!!! Crvnts (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Billy Minter

message: His date of death is wrong. A number of newspapers reported on 20 May 1940 that he had died "over the weekend". This puts his date of death as 18 or 19 May 1940.Goonerak (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Theresa Kunegunda Sobieska

message: Theresa Kunegunda Sobieska or Therese Kunigunde of Bavaria, or similar? Well, does Wikipedia have an article on Silvia Sommerlath? 
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)  states "For royalty other than monarchs: ... 7. Do not use 'surnames' in article names." -- Matthead discuß!     O       15:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Cynoglossum amabile

message: it is a flowering biennial that lives 2 years,ussually blooming the second. it thrives in shady moist conditions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.176.40.254 (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)