lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paddington Green Police Station

message: :I will take one soon. - Solar 18:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Beat you to it! I seem to have caught part of the overpass too. Oh dear. - The Blackfriar 13:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: :"The IRA bombed the telephone box outside the police station early one morning in the late 1990s as a demonstration to the British security services."
Can we have a source for that? It sounds dubious because of the vagueness ("early one morning in the late 1990s"), and because the PIRA (which most readers would tend to assume was being referred to) was on ceasefire for most of the late 1990s. 86.138.18.18 14:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It did happen as I was living there at the time and remember it clearly, but I think it was more like 1990 or 1991, so the sentence should probably say in the early 1990s. I will look for a source. - Solar 20:44, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The date was 10 October 1992 , I will change the sentence. - Solar 20:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The source verifies the date and the information "Device exploded in a phone box outside the police station. One person injured". Nothing about IRA or demonstration.Bjenks (talk) 15:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: IRA bombing

message: Can we have a citation for the sentence, 'Recently media publications have stated the old and decrepid mid 60's Police station as "inadequate to hold terrorists.' I have attempted to find any reference to this statement without result.  If it is simply someones subjective opinion, it should be removed!  62.3.115.74 19:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "inadequate to hold terrorists"
Talk:Hatchards

message: Added photo and removed request for photo,KTo288 19:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic request

message: We read 'Simon Vandenbergh, a controversial bookseller'.  How annoying is that?  When we read that someone is controversial, we wish to know why. Either tell us or don't use the word.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.57.168 (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial 

message: I took out the sentence that said it's a branch of Waterstones. It's true that the company that owns Hatchards was acquired by Waterstones, but Waterstones is part of W.H. Smith's; that doesn't make it a branch of Waterstones or a branch of WHS. Richard75 (talk) 20:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterstones
Talk:MultiDimensional eXpressions

message: This page could really use some fleshing out and updating, perhaps even code samples. 131.107.0.89 16:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, MDX is not Microsoft solution although it was first proposed by Microsoft. But even the first implementation wasn't done by Microsoft. And XMLA council owns the standard. Second, JOLAP is not multidimensional language. It is set of APIs. Certainly JOLAP deserves its own page, but this entry is about MDX language. Wikiolap 23:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

message: MDX is compared with SQL; SQL has a declarative part (DDL, e.g. CREATE TABLE), a manipulative part (DML, e.g. SELECT *) and an operations / management piece (e.g. GRANT...).  I wasn't clear after reading this whether MDX is a declarative standard, a manipulative standard, a management standard, or all 3.
MW
: MDX is mostly DML (i.e. SELECT and UPDATE), but it has some DDL as well. The article focuses on the DML part mostly. Wikiolap 21:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DDL vs. DML 

message: The acronym 'MDDX' is used twice here.  Is that a typo or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.178.63.3 (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MDDX vs MDX
Talk:Ye Olde Cheshire Cheese

message: Removing the request for photos.  Article already has one, and given it is so gloomy inside, I think the only picture that would come out is already there! Legis 17:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does the name reflect a connection to cheese?Bill (talk) 04:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:PS Tattershall Castle

message: Photos were requested for this page and have now been added. I removed the reqphotoin-London tag.
The Blackfriar 08:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: :The Tattershall Castle is probably named after Tattershall Castle in Lincolnshire.
Why probably? Is there any doubt?  I think the Castle predates the steamer! MortimerCat 21:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Humber-ferry-Tattershall-Castle-returning-Hull/story-25907911-detail/story.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.239.111.108 (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tattershall Castle returning to Hull for refit 

message: I have added citations and more information. I hope this is all good for removing the REF/IMPROVE warning? The joy of all things (talk) 15:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amendements 
Talk:National Farmers' Union of England and Wales

message: Central office (for photo request): Kings Buildings, 16 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JJ. TheGrappler 16:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alex Muller 20:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: The layout of this article needs to be improved, to meet the general layout of wikipedia pages.
94.192.254.183 (talk) 13:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout
Talk:Ivry Gitlis

message: The article states that he plays the "Sancy" Stradivarius. However the Stradivarius article states that he owns the "Chant de Cygne" (Swan Song) violin from 1737. I suppose it is possible that he owns one but plays another but it seems unlikely; does anyone know what is the true situation? Rachel Pearce (talk) 12:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Stradivarius? 

message: Though his date of birth is given here as August 25, 1922, the source cited gives it as August 22.  Which is correct? Kostaki mou (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Date 
Talk:UBM plc

message: Central office (for photo request): Ludgate House, 245 Blackfriars Road, London, SE1 9UY. TheGrappler 16:30, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Alex Muller 19:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Noted. But this article describes  UBM's history prior to the acquisition by and integration into Informa plc. Dormskirk (talk) 11:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Random comment
Talk:Duchess Cecilie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin

message: * Cecilie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin → Duchess Cecilie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin … Rationale: A user unilaterally moved this page to a version without the title, saying that it was not needed. Current WP conventions state otherwise. Cecilie only ever was a crown princess, not a queen or empress. Therefore the page ought to be moved back. Charles 16:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See above. Charles 16:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Support As nominator. Charles 16:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :See above. Charles 16:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: "While under the monarchy this would have meant a great change for Cecilie and her husband, the change was potentially dangerous for the leader of the Nazi German state."</br>
I'm changing "for" to "because of." As far as I can tell, it could be read as "dangerous for Hitler," when clearly the opposite is the case.--Adûnâi (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect wording? 

message: "She settled in Bad Kissingen until 1952 when she moved to an apartment in the Frauenkopf district of Stuttgart."</br>
This sentence is repeated twice in the article. Should it be changed in one of the cases? It's the first time I see such a thing on Wikipedia, has this page been vandalized?--Adûnâi (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A sentence repeated twice in the article 

message: Reads like a novel. Kudos to whoever wrote it. Cecile was one classy lady. I am gonna see if I can find her memoirs.  47.17.215.176 (talk) 19:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow, what a beautiful article!
Talk:North End tube station

message: I have deleted a  from this - I think it's a bit overoptimistic to ask for a photo of something that was never built! —  iridescent (talk to me!) 15:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that there is a surface building.. (and we now have a photo) Secretlondon (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know - I took it! —  iridescent 16:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Maida Vale tube station

message: The article on Maida Vale station at Unfinished buildings.org speculates that the developer of the two parades of shops on each side of Elgin Avenue anticipated the construction of the station by building the fireplaces on the first floor in advance. I have left the link but commented it as speculation and probably wrong for the following reasons: 
#The architectural style of the adjacent buildings on Elgin Avenue appears to be more in keeping with the 1880s or 1890s (which would be consistent with when most of the area around the station was developed) rather than the first or second decade of the 20th century. The parades of shops were thus, most probably built between 15 and 35 years before the station and, most probably, long before any plans had been made for the Bakerloo Line.
#Developer's simply do not build in this way. The fireplaces visible in the picture on the Unfinished buildings.org site do not indicate that the developer anticipated a later structure by building part of it in advance; they are the remnants of a three storey building that was demolished so that the station could be built: 
#*The reason the fireplace openings were left in place is that the end wall of the now demolished building and the end wall of the existing parade of shops were built flush against one another. To make a neat job of the demolition by removing the final, thin layer of bricks that formed the end wall of the demolished building could have damaged the end wall of the parade leaving the owners of the Bakerloo Line liable for repairs. Leaving the final skin of bricks from the demolished building in place avoided this risk.
#*Also, because of the difficulty of building a brick wall neatly against an existing structure (it is impossible to ensure that the mortar is properly pointed), if the parade had been built after the demolished building, the end wall of the parade, had it been exposed by the demolition, might have been found to be of a poor standard requiring repointing or re-skinning to ensure it was made weatherproof. Again this would have been the responsibility of the Bakerloo Line owners. Again, leaving the final skin of bricks from the demolished building in place avoided this problem
#*The images from the London Transport Museum Photographic Archive show the structure of the wall more clearly, and it can be seen that the front and rear edges of the wall show the "toothed" effect where the alternate courses of bricks from the front and rear wall have been removed.
DavidCane 11:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speculation on station being built higher
Talk:Stonebridge Park station

message: Article mentions an earlier station with no other details. Edwin Course's "London Railways" has "Stonebridge Park 1875-1902, not open continuously", so the article needs revision.--SilasW (talk) 20:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete History 

message: Trying to read article revealed repetitions and inconsistencies which I've tried to lose without supersuccess. Quite how many stations there were is unclear, ¿¿one 1875-1902, one 1902-1912, one 1912 to WWII destruction, one "built after war by LMS" (whose post-war, pre-nationalisation life was brief)??. UL Lines to lines. Delinked dates. &c &c.--SilasW (talk) 15:18, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of 1 July 2009 

message: Several odd statements had entered this article which I've cleared out or corrected.
It takes its name from the nearby junction named Stonebridge Park, which links the A406 (North Circular Road) and A404. I have tried to find any verification for this statement. It appears clear that the junction is rarely called Stonebridge Park and that any such usage postdates the 1875 naming of the station.
Due to its proximity to the Jubilee line stations, it is sometimes used during weekend engineering works as a terminus for rail replacement bus services, despite the fact that the Jubilee Line does not actually stop at Stonebridge Park. The station is not near the Jubilee Line stations and rail relacement bus services for the Jubilee Line do not call there.
Location Confusion. The station is technicially located in Tokyngton. Stonebridge Park is the name of the nearby junction. On the OS map, the station is located exactly on the boundary of Tokyngton and Stonebridge. The station's postcode is NW10, which is the postcode of Stonebridge. Although as the station is located in Argenta Way, the street-name sign tells us that the postcode is HA9, which is Wembley's postcode. This confusion has been here for a very long time. There are no plans by TfL in renaming the station
Confusion only exists if one expects tight linkage between station names and electoral ward boundaries. This section was marked as Original Research in January 2010 but has not been verified.
Future Developments. The proposed West London Orbital will call... This is a proposal which may have no future at all. The title is inappropriate and the use of "will" inaccurate. Lengthy description of the proposal is unnecessary as it has its own article NebY (talk) 15:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up
Talk:North Wembley station

message: I am removing all of the information that is given in the imperative mood in the services section. As in Wikipedia:NOTMANUAL:
"Describing to the reader how other people or things use something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use something is not."
Please message me for further details. Worley-d (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Emmanuel Mané-Katz

message: I've removed the PROD notice, added by User:Shoeofdeath with the explanation "Non-notable painter. No links here, no articles in any other language".
I think there is scope for an article here: Google finds 19,000 hits for him, and there's a museum of his work in Haifa http://ilmuseums.com/museum_eng.asp?id=9 (now spam url) with exhibitions that change every 3 months. Jheald 06:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, but this has existed since September 2005 and is still a very weak stub with only a sentence of content added by the (banned) creator. Google hits and and a museum do not mean someone is notable. There is no way this will become an article - if there was "scope" someone would have added some actual content by now. shoeofdeath 08:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed PROD 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved by BegbertBiggs per Special:PermanentLink/1186541844request by JackkBrown at WP:RM/TR. (closed by non-admin page mover) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Emmanuel Mane-Katz →  – To agree with its own lead sentence. Wikipedia includes diacritics when they belong there (even if some more jingoistic English-language sources drop them.)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 November 2023
Talk:Meir Dagan

message: I wonder, is there really a reliable source for the claim that parts of the West Bank are called "Samaria" and "Judea"? To me, it appears to be Israel-specific (and thus POV) terminology. I suggest simply "The West Bank". MeteorMaker (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Samaria, Judea and Gaza"? 
Talk:Meir Wieseltier

message: n commemoration of the unfortunate passing of the poet Meir Wieseltier,   YEKUM TARBUT present  'Poem  on Jerusalem' one   of his most important and well-known poems, which is considered the epitome of "the spirit of Tel Aviv"in Hebrew and in translation to English.
https://www.yekum.org/2023/04/%d7%90%d7%9d-%d7%9c%d7%90-%d7%aa%d7%94%d7%99%d7%94-%d7%99%d7%a8%d7%95%d7%a9%d7%9c%d7%99%d7%9d-%d7%a9%d7%99%d7%a8-%d7%9e%d7%a4%d7%95%d7%a8%d7%a1%d7%9d-%d7%9e%d7%90%d7%aa-%d7%9e%d7%90%d7%99%d7%a8/?fbclid=IwAR0BVRzdB-BvcbQCjiQ0459nCatW55_GM9XbGsrBJ67p2XLP0mUyKx1kyFQ 109.64.108.129 (talk) 13:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem  on Jerusalem
Talk:Apollo Victoria Theatre

message: Please do not add copyright material to this page. It just gets the whole thing quickly deleted. (And if you pinched the text from us, and then claimed copyright on it - shame on you). Kbthompson (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not use this as a reference, it appears to be a prior version of this article and by the principle that something cannot be verified by itself, it cannot be a valid reference. Kbthompson (talk) 08:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: I think this is a good jobs Kala chor khan (talk) 23:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jobs
Talk:Swiss Cottage Library

message: , do you have a reference for , I can't find it on Harwood p 496-8 or the listing. TSventon (talk) 01:43, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @TSventon sorry, this should been sourced to the RIBAJ, which is also where I got the quote that "demolition would have been a mistake".   – Isochrone (T) 09:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: The text says that the refurbishment cost £7.9 million in 2003 "equivalent to £184.3 million in 2019". This sounds pretty unlikely. Inflation in the UK has been bad but this is an increase of over 20 times in 16 years. There's no reference for the number so it's not possible to check where it came from. The Bank of England inflation calculator gives £11.28 in 2019 for £7.9 in 2003 so it seems at the very least the decimal point might be in the wrong place.
212.159.76.165 (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: IP editor, thank you for spotting this. I have corrected the inflation calculation, where the year had been entered as 1956 rather than 2003. TSventon (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refurbishment cost
Talk:Brockwell Lido

message: Note that this photo is up for deletion, the discussion is at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Brockwell_Lido_1938.jpg
It is an odd situation of Lambeth archives expecting to automatically have copyright for an anonymous photo over 70 years old where they have not actually published the photo themselves but did make it available for public access in 2003. Your comments either way are welcome in the discussion on Commons.—Speedoguy (talk) 00:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1938 Photo up for deletion 

message: Insertion of information about the CASC registered swimming club at the Lido. Please review my edit. Timothysutton1 (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brockwell Swimmers club
Talk:Michael Zandberg

message: The name sounds Swedish.
:Sounds more Dutch to me (with the Zandberg spelling), if I'm not mistaken Scandinavian languages do have element of English and Dutch/German in them? UmutK (talk) 15:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Typically this is caused by a tranliteration from German names to the Hebrew alphabet and back to the Latin alphabet. gidonb (talk) 12:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Peking to Paris

message: The map of the 1907 route erroneously shows present-day borders in Europe & elsewhere. It should show pre-WWI borders — and it should be much larger for comprehension. Sca (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong map

message: Add The 7th Peking to Paris Motor Challenge 2019 Jidanni (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 7th Peking to Paris Motor Challenge 2019 

message: In reading up on Robert Neyret, I see he competed in the 2015 Paris to Beijing classic car race, with many pictures to illustrate the journey.  Is that the same race as "Peking to Paris"? PLawrence99cx (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Paris to Beijing an entirely different race?
Talk:Shutter (2004 film)

message: The Critical Response section just lists the RottenTomatoes score. But following the link to RottenTomatoes, one finds that most of the reviews there are actually of the 2008 American remake. So maybe until RottenTomatoes gets its act together, it would be better to include some snippets from a few reviews that are actually of the film, like other movie pages do, rather than list RT's erroneous percent score.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.243.172 (talk) 03:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Response Section
Talk:Daniel Coburn

message: *There is a lot of information here that was POV or unverified. This article needs major cleanup. I corrected basic errors, but had to erase a lot of information because it was POV. Also, this article does not conform to WP:BIO standards. -- Metromoxie 16:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Mistah F.A.B.

message: Figured might as well add his name to the article, feel free to correct my grammer or citations -- Fab article. -- Carlos 16:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a source for his name, we should put it in. -- Joebeone (Talk) 19:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added his name 
Talk:1916 Texas hurricane

message: In the course of making some minor edits to improve flow and diction, I'm encountering a few places where I feel clarification from the main authors would be beneficial. 
*Crossing the Lesser Antilles from August 12–13,[4] the developing tropical cyclone produced gusty winds, peaking at 25 mph (35 km/h) on Antigua and reaching minimal tropical storm intensity offshore. - Does the 25 mph measurement represent a gust or a sustained wind? "Gusty winds" implies the former, so I want to be sure.
*One woman was killed by a downed electric wire. - Presumably electrocution was involved here... does the source say as much so we can be specific? 
*Another train of cars was readied at Seabrook in case additional evacuations were required. - I'm having trouble verifying this in the given source (and the reason I was looking was because "train of cars" is a bit ambiguous, given that we've already discussed traincars and automobiles).
*All Western Union communication lines between San Antonio and Brownsville were severed by 2:00 p.m. CST (19:00 UTC) on August 18 - Also having difficulty verifying this time in provided sources.
More as I go along, perhaps. – Juliancolton | Talk 20:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Carr Lowrey Glass Company

message: I am having difficulty in finding information on increasing the visability of the article that I wrote.  For example, if I type "Carr Lowrey" or "Carr Lowrey Glass" into the search field, it returns nothing.  I have to enter the entire name of "Carr Lowrey Glass Company" to return the article.  I have searched for information on metadata, but have come up empty-handed.  Can someone direct me to a good resource?
:It can take a few days (or longer) for an article to show up properly in the search data. I'm not sure, but I think it is just a software limitation. To make it more visible, the best thing to do is make sure it is linked from as many relevant articles as possible. See also help on creating redirects. If there are other terms which you think will frequently be used to mean the same article, you can create redirects to the article. -Dawson 17:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled