Talk:Organizations in Deus Ex

message: . . . to UNATCO, not UNATCO (Deus Ex). I mean, how many UNATCOs are there?--Codenamecuckoo 20:26, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article originally was at UNATCO, actually, with some uninformed soul performing a copy & paste move. I've repaired it. JRM · Talk 18:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I suggest a move . . . 

message: The UNATCO dedication reads: "Nihil aliud scit necessitas quam vincere" and is currently translated as: "Nothing is more needed than to conquer."
I would like to suggest an alternative translation. I feel that the more accurate translation should read: "Nothing else knows how to conquer more than necessity."
Reason being, the current quote confuses the original meaning by making "necessitas" a comparative when I believe it is the subject of the sentence (verified by "The Bantam New College Latin & English Dictionary by John C. Traupman, Ph.D.).
In addition, the phrase "Nihil aliud" is a Roman idiom meaning "nothing else", and the word "scit" used with an infinitive (i.e. "vincere") is idiomatic for "knows how to conquer."
Chryso 20:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNATCO Latin Dedication Quote 

message: Where are descriptions of all these MJ12 troops, differences between SERIES P/N/L and so on? They were in the Majestic 12 article, but are lost after merger. 213.141.137.47 14:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are MJ12 Commando, MIB/WIB, Usual MJ12 Troop etc...? 

message: :Image:Vandenberg-X51.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Vandenberg-X51.jpg

message: :Image:NSFTerrorist.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:NSFTerrorist.jpg

message: It's two years later. Nobody's seen fit to comment on these organizations as a group or individually in the interim. As such, this is a pile of unsourced plot summary and non-free images. Why shoudn't this be redirected to Deus Ex? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 22:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't find independent sources. I was about to merge but... seriously.DDDtriple3 (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Im reverting the article. I think any proposals to merge the article or keep the article separate merits further discussion. Exiledone (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two years later 

message: Hi,
This article is in desperate need for reform. I intend to rewrite this article completely. As a result, the tags will be removed because they should no longer apply. I will include additional references and rewrite some of the paragraphs. Please comment on the changes, or make any corrections that you see fit. Please add any tags if there are any problems with this rewrite. I thank you all for your understanding.
--Hrbm14 (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 update 

message: Talk:Deus_Ex#Characters_and_organizations_subarticles czar ♔ 11:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion