Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Gundagai editor

message: So as not to confuse the RfC with continuing to add evidence, more recent behaviour will be added here.--A Y Arktos\talk 22:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ongoing breaches of policy 

message: /  /  /  / 
Breached blocking policy, civility - both in actual comments and in edit summaries, no personal attacks and added unreferenced material thereby breaching verifiability.  Also quite clearly editing with a strong point of view.  Copyright violations of , for example with this edit
A number of editors have reverted his contributions in the last 24 hours:
*Deltabeignet 
*Galactor213 
*Knowledge Seeker  (who also blocked him twice)
*Kusma  
*MER-C  
*Petaholmes  
*Bidgee   
*Wiki alf   
I have reported misuse of service to Telstra for "Defamatory material (eg: publication by another person of a false and derogatory statement about you)" citing some of the edits the anon has made and offering to supply further edit history.--A Y Arktos\talk 22:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  27 July (UTC) 

message: - note blocked for 1 week - warned on talk page that all edits made while blocked will be reverted--A Y Arktos\talk 01:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 28 July

message: /  /  /  /  /  --A Y Arktos\talk 10:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  29 and 30 July 

message: /  - both specifically editing the  article in breach of blocking policy and making personal attacks--A Y Arktos\talk 21:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  31 July 

message: /  / --A Y Arktos\talk 22:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 August 

message: /  /  /  --A Y Arktos\talk 01:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 August 

message: --A Y Arktos\talk 02:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 August 

message: --A Y Arktos\talk 08:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 August 

message: Despite the farewell, which had been threatened/promised before, she returned. 
 reverted by User:Ryulong. She returned again: .  
Despite her assertion in her edit summary that "DONT MES SUP COPNTENT OF DISCUSSION PAGES OR TRY OR STOP PEOPLE CONTRIBUTING - HERE IS FOR EVERYONE, NOT JUST ONE OR TWO."  Wikipedia does indeed block editors for breach of policies and guidelines.  As the user has breached 
# No original research and Verifiability
# No personal attacks, Civility, Etiquette
#Blocking policy
her contributions are not welcome.  The contributions of 10 August were all to insert unverified material which has already been discussed and determined by a number of editors to be unverified.--A Y Arktos\talk 21:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 August 

message: * - included abusive edit summary and the copying (plagiarism in fact) of an article about plagiarism which was presumably an attempt to back up her charge of plagiarism on the Gundagai article but which did not in fact deal with the lack of congruence of the actual words.  That the SMH and the wikipedia cover similar content does not mean the wikipedia has plagiarise another's work.
* reinserted more copied infor about plagiarism but still dod not deal with the actual Gundagai content.  She was warned with Template:Nothanks-drm by User:Robertmyers
--A Y Arktos\talk 10:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 August 

message: * additions to Talk:Gundagai reverted by MER-C with comment JS: Reverted vandalism by 203.54.186.243 to last version by AYArktos. Please do not compromise the integrity of pages.--A Y Arktos\talk 11:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 August 

message: * - personal attacks on another user's talk page--Arktos talk 00:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  15 August 

message: * - incivility at Wiradjuri, eg You cannot understand Indigenous culture including language that well through your own ethnocentric framework. and Wiradjui' does not mean 'not here'. Who wrote the Dictionary? Dame Edna? Find a better reference as that one is totally incorrect. Its about as useless as 'three rivers'. - the latter being inserted in the middle of the article.  The former part of an unsigned comment on the talk page. Edits reverted by Robertmyers; editor warned for lack of civility.--Arktos talk 10:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  17 August 

message: breached WP:NPA (reverted by Gimboid13)and also again reintroduced information into 2 articles about an alleged massacre at Coolac without any sources despite there having been extensive requests for sources in the past.--Arktos talk 09:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 September 

message: - possibly same editor, though different IP range, however, same tenor of comments on Wiradjuri - an article previously the subject of the anon's posts, reverted by user:Can't sleep, clown will eat me.--Golden Wattle  talk 09:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 11 September

message: ,  - reintroducing again unsourced  material in breach of Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research even though previously requested several times not to reintroduce the material until reliable sources are cited.--Golden Wattle  talk 09:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 and 15 September 

message: --Golden Wattle  talk 01:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  21 September 

message: Yet to be added by someone who cares, but active!--Golden Wattle  talk 21:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: October

message: I have filed a formal request for arbitration regarding the anonymous Gundagai editor. Please make any statements you feel are appropriate. Thatcher131 01:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitration