lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lambda Kappa Sigma

message: Not sure if you have access to the Wikipedia Library, but https://www-jstor-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/stable/41112453?seq=8 has chartering dates (as well as chartering date for the alumni chapters for each. Not sure if those should be in the table or not). Not sure when I'll have the time to copy it over, so wanted you to have the link.Naraht (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Perfect! Many thanks. Rublamb (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapter List with dates
Talk:Baandee, Western Australia

message: It's location on openstreetmap referenced against Bing aerial photos shows no actual buildings- a few ruins at most. 	--SDavies (talk) 07:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: it is always better if someone has a photo on the ground, otherwise there is the category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Ghost_towns_in_Western_Australia  that anyo0ne is most welcome to add JarrahTree 10:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this actually a town?
Talk:Arrector pili muscle

message: The correct spelling (according to Dorland's medical dictionary) is arrector pili (singular) and arrectores pilorum (plural). — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyMcQ (talk • contribs) 16:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Hello! 
This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Skin.jpg, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Skin.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 10:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Skin.jpg]]
Talk:DFC

message: I would suggest to erase 'digital fine contrast' added by someone after I had already added 'digital fine contrast - LG's technology improving...'. Maybe it was overlooked by the editor... ?
--francesco3 17:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

message: lawls  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimo1989 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  delicious flat chest?
Talk:Battle of Seal Cove

message: I've made some style and wording changes, so I removed the tag. If you think it should stand, please discuss the proposed reassessments here.
DagosNavy 16:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed clean up tag
Talk:Jack Adams (disambiguation)

message: Sorry, but almost 6 times as many people view the ice hockey Jack Adams than the rugby one, and certainly a lot more than the others. Is there any real reason for this to direct to a DAB page? I'd say dominance is clear. -- MichiganCharms (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominant Jack Adams again
Talk:Holbrook Blinn

message: I'm a namesake of Holbrook Blinn, he being a paternal great uncle by marriage. One of the family stories about him is that the fall from the horse is not what killed him, rather it was the onset of gangrene after what I believe was a broken arm.  He refused amputation and died from the resulting infection. I'm in possession of his death mask, the creation of which seems to have been a fairly common practice in the decade in which he died.  
Ed McCurry 17:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ship Simulator (video game)

message: Should we make another page for 2008? --Npop 01:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it - I think it could do with a few updates. (Frammy7 (talk))  —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added WP:reliable sources, rewote slightly to WP:NPOV, fixed inline citations, removed citation banner.Jezhotwells (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline citations 

message: Is there any reason some of the ships have been removed (22 March 09)? as none was given in the summary by Jonny6.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frammy7 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted his edit. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship Simulator 2008 ships removed?

message: I was wondering if, due to the impending release of Ship Simulator Extremes in 2010, we should split this into 4 pages. 1 for each of the games, and 1 overall for the 'series'. (I was looking at the RollerCoaster_Tycoon_(series) page as an example of what we could do). But I was wondering what people thought of this? would it follow Wikipedias guidelines / would it make sense?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frammy7 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting into seperate pages for each game? 
Talk:Sword of the Stars: Born of Blood

message: Are the Zuul ships going to look like the Slaver ships?
Also, any info available on the Tunnel Drive FTL?
Chronolegion 12:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavers 

message: I'm removing the "Improvements", it looks horrible and it is not informative, its advertising, it has bloody exclamation marks. Like this is the first game you could ever make demands in. Someone who cares  and knows can rewrite properly sometime in the future.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 07:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  !
Talk:SoundClick

message: how the hell is going on about hip-hop idiots an external link? -- user:Mail10
I agree - this blatant self-promotion about characters in a scene war is important to them, but lost on everyone else, as well as being completely irrelevant to the topic. Hip hop stars are notorious for their name-dropping and cussing - take it somewhere else, lads.
Seriously guys, promote your tat elsewhere.
There was a highly unencyclopedic comment about some artists not having respect for each other or some other unreferenced tripe. I amended it to a lame "Some feel..."-type statement, but it should probably just be edited out.
Radical25 22:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Black Book of Carmarthen

message: Please see Category talk:Earliest known manuscripts by language. Enaidmawr (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Input requested 

message: Would it not be more apt to call them "British" as the Welsh don't have a monopoly on ancient Britons? Celtic kingdoms of the north of Britain would persumably fall into "Scottish" territory if we really must bandy around modern terminology, since the Scots are comprised of Gaels, Picts and Celtic Britons of the north and the Scottish are as much successors to ancient British culture as the Welsh.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.144.142 (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Welsh" heroes of Hen Ogledd? 
Talk:Vamsadhara River

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:Physiographic macroregions of China

message: I'd love to add characters but my computer (at work) doesnt have the capacity. So please anyone with the will and the way... I do plan to add maps they are forth coming.Calabashhh 20:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might get them via a Google search by cutting and pasting. Badagnani 21:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese characters 

message: You can find some other regions here. Some of them may overlap.  Badagnani 20:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other regions

message: Is "macro-regions" an indigenous Chinese term? If so, what's the Chinese name for this?  If not, which foreign scholar came up with this idea?  Badagnani 20:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an idea proposed by G.W. Skinner of Stanford. It is not an indigenous term, and I do not know what the Chinese translation is. The idea is touched upon by Jonathan Spence in his Search for Modern China.
Calabashhh 21:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who came up with the macro-regions?
Talk:Kimberly Hunt

message: According to: Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Primary criterion for Notability of people: "A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject"
:I would like to check the references that were recently added, but they are not in the correct format; the references list the web site publisher and title, but there is no URL, author, or date published, so I can not locate the article. Please include this information, so people can verify the sources; for help on citing sources see Wikipedia:Citing sources. —User:Christopher Mann McKay 17:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: What happen to Ms Hunt top lip on the left side? 2604:CA00:1CA:2C15:0:0:A61:CF5C (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top lip over filled
Talk:Keyword (computer programming)

message: (Original threadstarter did not title thread. --Netizen (talk) 15:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question: Create article for broader concept of "keyword"?

message: I’ve merged this to Reserved word, in this edit and this edit (and following cleanup ones). This is because the articles mention them as synonyms, and they are visibly used by many interchangeably (e.g., the C standard), and thus this is better suited for a “Definition” section of one article.
:—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 16:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Reserved word]]
Template talk:Messianic Judaism/Tanakh

message: Tanakh I would like to propose that Tanakh be added to the template. The Tanakh is central to the Messianic movement, and is a central item in many Messianic synagogues. ,, ,,,
:See Above. Especially since for many Messianics, the only "Torah" that they accept is Tanakh. -- Avi 17:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure exactly if you're making a point for or against inclusion of "Tanakh" in the template. I don't know if your statement is positive or negative evidence for or against. I would ask that in this section of the talk page, that everyone provide sources for their claims either way. inigmatus 13:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of previous agreement, and because no one seems to want to provide a source proving that Tanakh is not relvant to Messianic Judaism, I am readding the link back to the template. Furthemore since Tanakh is not owned by Judaism, this point is not in dispute. inigmatus 17:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason this Template was allowed to be re-created after it was deleted via TfD was because you promised not to add items that were already on the Judaism template, which was the reason it was deleted in the first place. Please don't break that promise, or pretend agreement where there is none. Thanks. Jayjg (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of international rankings

message: Why doesn't this article consist of more countries and their international rankings? Whatever, happen to Canada, the UK, Iceland, Norway, France, Germany, and etc... Is there a lack of available data for this information? Why are these specific countries chosen for this article?
:Because the articles haven't been created yet. The Evil Spartan 14:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See :Category:International rankings. International rankings of France
211.110.55.63 (talk) 12:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Cybercobra (talk) 06:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion|Templates for deletion]] nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:Lists of countries}}]] 

message: Actually looking over this whole article it looks like a badly put together coatrack of links to lists, articles and whatevers which may or may not have anything to do with international rankings. Some of the choices of what to include are completely arbitrary (I've removed some of these from the Economics section). There are also many many many obvious gaps in what is excluded (GDP per capita?). I know Wikipedia loves its "list" articles but this one's not even coherent.
I'm thinking this is a pretty good candidate for deletion.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lacking content for a notable topic is not a reason for deletion. Instead, the article should be expanded.Miradre (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD time? 

message: Last time I looked, about a year ago, Wikipedia offered quick access to the sort of Lists you need to understand the basic facts about the world we all live in, especially Lists of countries by Population, nominal GDP, GDP at Purchasing Power Parity, nominal GDP per capita, and GDP per capita at Purchasing Power Parity. And articles about the Group of Two (USA+China), the G7, G8, and G20, generally provided links to such lists, with the Group of Two article also including such data for the US and China in the article itself. It seems that some person or group has now systematically removed all such information (or at the very least has systematically made it a great deal harder to find), in what seems at least to me quite likely to be the worst act of vandalism and/or information suppression ever inflicted on Wikipedia (except that I doubt that the motivation for doing so had anything to do with a mere desire to vandalize). Does anybody have any knowledge or ideas on how and why this came about, and what if anything can be done about it? Meanwhile I shall presumably just have to get my data from such places as the CIA World Factbook. Tlhslobus (talk) 06:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systematic disappearance of relevant Lists 

message: ok 77.115.216.52 (talk) 22:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mexico 79.115.136.249 (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ok
Talk:Dalston Kingsland railway station

message: How can these figures entered in the article with so much enthusiasm be considered meaningful? OK, they show what was counted in some way but they typically fluctuate wildly (as here) and the source, the ORR, proclaims that the counting methodology and effectiveness are in constant states of flux. Mostly they depend on some number of tickets which clearly with the ever-changing ways of paying fares in not a solid base.--SilasW (talk) 20:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pax #s as doubtful as ever 
Talk:Frequency addition source of optical radiation

message: I am really puzzled about where this term FASOR came from.  I have never heard of lasers generated by NLO being called anything other than lasers.  I think someone just made the term up.  If you do a google search for "Frequency Addition Source of Optical Radiation" you get only the wikipedia articles and one publication in a conference proceeding (Advances in Adaptive Optics II. Edited by Ellerbroek, Brent L.; Bonaccini Calia, Domenico. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 6272, pp. 62721L (2006)).  So hmmm... maybe we need to think about proposing this article for deletion? Comments? --Chuck Sirloin 18:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The description makes sense, but I didn't consider notability. I created this article because I thought the elaborate descriptions with all articles that included :Image:Starfield Optical Range - sodium laser.jpg and in laser were not in place there. I believe the image description originally stated that it was a dye laser, which turned out to be wrong. I think  digged up the information, as in this edit. Maybe Deglr6328 knows more. If you are right, it might be more appropriate to put it at the image description, or maybe at the starfire optical range page. Han-Kwang 20:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: Why is that formula written in that way . Is it to impress people ? 
maybe for simpler people like me you can write  lambda = lambda1 + lambda2 
doesn't that make the world a lot simpler ?
80.255.247.57 (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be much simpler, but not correct. If l1=l2=500, the equation in the article produces l=1/(1/500+1/500)=250, but in your proposal l=500+500=1000 which is obviously not the same thing. Han-Kwang (t) 10:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Equation

message: What are the advantages of frequency addition? Why not immediately produce the desired frequency? For example, since the target frequency is supposed to excite sodium atoms, it is conceivable that it can also be produced using sodium vapor.--2003:4:F010:2:0:0:0:2 (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages?
Talk:Whiteout (2009 film)

message: *Comic-Con '07: Warner Bros. Preview
*SDCC 07: Exclusive: Whiteout Helmer Chat
Headlines. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Headlines

message: I suggest anyone remove this from the article's text:
"Carrie is unaware that she is involved in a sixty year old murder that the killer would do anything to keep secret." That would mean, the killer is now at least 80 years old. But according to the film, the murderer died himself in this "sixty year old murder" (which - besides - is only 53 years old, not 60, because the film explicitely sets it in 1957). --boarders paradise (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  80-year-old killer? 

message: The phrase goes: "The movie's banner was displayed in Times Square during the month of August 2009.". What is the meaning of this? It should be improved or removed.  (talk) user:Al83tito  12:16pm, 2 September 2013 UTC
:Yes, I agree. I'll delete it. Lovingboth (talk) 20:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrase in Critical response section does not make sense 
Talk:Richard Jacobs (businessman)

message: I'm going to remove the proposed deletion tag from this article. The article obviously can be vastly improved, but I don't have the time to do that right now, and I believe that it already asserts notability of the subject. He's responsible for the construction of numerous developments, including large shopping malls and skyscrapers, and he used to own a major league baseball team. If you still feel that this person doesn't meet the notability guidelines, please take it to AFD. - EurekaLott 18:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy to leav the article for the time being, provided notablity can be established (although I musthave skimmed earlier, as ownership of a major sporting team is no doubt notable). Just as a matter of pedantry,  is for when notability is not yet established -  is used when none is asserted or claimed. - Tiswas(t) 18:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod nomination
Talk:List of non-native birds in Great Britain

message: Many of the species listed on this page are neither introduced per se or feral, but rather escapees from (some sort of) captivity. I propose, therefore, that the index be changed to reflect this fact, e.g. List of British birds: introduced, escaped and feral species—GRM (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See on-going discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds#Suggestion_to_rename_page_List_of_British_birds:_introduced_or_feral_species—GRM (talk) 12:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now located here in the archives. Jack (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More discussion here and here (until archived). Jack (talk) 00:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this page? 
Talk:Thyrsus

message: In the opening paragraph: "Ariel adorned herself in wild vine and prayed that he would remember her love for him." He who? 12.180.196.160 02:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That statement, along with another deleted one, were added by an anonymous user.  I have deleted it.  It may be re-added to the appropriate section if it is properly introduced and sourced. Robert K S 03:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  He who? Article is missing a key word.
Talk:CHUM Chart

message: The putative records given in the Chart Figures section have to be wrong.  There have been CHUM charts since the 1950s, and I'm pretty sure that there are, for example, Beatles tunes that spent longer than 4 weeks at number 1. Tom Duff 18:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention Elvis Presley...and looking at the 1986 list alone, both Madonna's "Live to Tell" and Jennifer Rush's "The Power of Love" matched four weeks, to boot. Bearcat 08:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: For what it's worth, I've killed the "chart figures" section as being far too biased to recent charts, and I've also killed the utterly OR speculation about chart patterns (like how a song that stalls at #2 never makes it to #1 after that, as if that phenomenon were at all unique to CHUM...) Bearcat 08:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Figures 

message: Don't know if this fits in the article, but the "Unknown Artist" who had a hit with "I'm Gettin the Message Alright" was most likely Jeril Deane, who released a single by this title on Solo Records (Solo #106) in 1957.
Faye Adams released a single called "Teenage Heart" (Herald #470) in 1956 --it could have charted a year later at CHUM.  However, the CHUM hit version could also have been a cover.  Author of this song is Alan Freed!
"Lonesome Heart" remains a mystery...
172.133.227.74 22:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One possibility could be they put records on their charts on the base of airplay. Perhaps they obtained an early release of James O'Gwynn's 1958 release "Talk to me oh lonesome heart" on Sun Records 89. 94.208.18.185 (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The unknown artists

message: This is to inform you that the CHUM chart archives are no longer available online now that the station has converted to "Toronto's Breaking News."  Somebody had better alert Craig Smith to this situation so the charts can be restored. 
In the meantime, we'll just have to be content with the RPM archives as an alternative, although those charts were national and not just Toronto.198.236.192.210 (talk) 01:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CP24