lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Madeline Gleason

message: Many of the references used are related to Luciene and Marcelle Labaudt and contain information that is irrelevant to this Madeline Gleason article, I started cleaning these up in the hopes of discovering good articles but there is more work neededJscarboro (talk) 18:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Labaudt clean-up needed
Talk:Harmonic progression

message: I hav a few things to say about how hard it is to read these roman numerals when this stuff can be written on a staff. When I've figured out who or what piece I'll use as an example, then I'll write numbers on the score and compare equivalent ratios like this:
3:2 is 12:8 or 15:10
in an example of microtonal musicology (or mechanical rendition). The work is harder than I expected. Sometimes I wonder why anyone bothers with harmony, then I notice that sometimes harmony is like an echo from the immediate past -- a note is held on one line, but the harmony it makes changes.
I don't typically hold notes in my own works. I'm sure that I've done it, but it's something that I avoid to the point where I've chucked a lot of work with repetition. And, of course, I think such work otta hav a big name behind the orijinal score without the numbers. 
Any sujjestions would be welcome. It should be a short piece, because my ear for music will come into play. If someone says that it sounds inferior to the orijinal, then I hav to revise my work.
In any case, when this work is done (and I hav confidence that other people are more capable of it than I am), I think this page should begin as being quite distinct from "chord progression". Potentially, I just don't know where to look.BrewJay (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do is to teach by example.
Talk:Blender (software)

message: Consider User:Mylo pinto rizvi/Blender (software)
Mylo can you briefly answer some points
#Name content sections to split from this article, and other Wikipedia articles which would be the target of merging that content.
#Which content sections do you think should be deleted outright without split or merge?
#Wikipedia typically discourages the inclusion of WP:PRIMARY sources, but there are lots of exceptions. Here in this article I see many citations to Blender Foundation, Blender Institute, blender.org, and similar. What approach do you suggest for evaluating whether we need to keep this information? Options
##Delete all information backed by these sources
##Case-by-case on everything
##Name some sections right now to surely keep, or to possibly shorten after discussion
#In my opinion, many articles benefit from identifying a few highly authoritative sources, vetting and trusting them, then trying to cite those authorities more often. Can you recommend or identify something like a reputable textbook on Blender, which we might use for guidance? Currently there are 300 citations to different sources, and while that is not necessarily bad, one-off articles are generally less authoritative than a thoughtful larger work.
More later - please do not think too hard about answering these. I am just starting conversation and trying to get oriented.  Bluerasberry (talk) 19:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: On 1 + 2 : Open Projects and Online Services should definitely be moved to the blender foundation page. The features section should be simplified. Supported Features and Integrator should be removed. Modified versions could also be removed as I don't think there are any blender forks that would be considered notable.  Mylo pinto rizvi (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: On 3 + 4 : I think it will be difficult to find none primary sources. There's the Blender developers blog (https://code.blender.org/), the blender foundation news blog (https://www.blender.org/news/) and the blender docs (https://docs.blender.org/). For secondary sources there is blendernation though I doubt that I would get used that much. On a blender manual, I have a copy of Blender by Example(2nd ed.) which could be useful. I think it would still be good to back up information with secondary sources when possible. The only section that I think wouldn't benefit from secondary sources would be the release history.  Mylo pinto rizvi (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Draft rewrite
Talk:Union de Transports Aériens

message: This article seems like it could be improved.  I think I will do it.  I'm currently bogged down with another article but I'm anxious to move on to this one.
I was thinking of adding history, mentioning the KSSU group (formed to buy the DC-10), mentioned that it was an early 747-300 operator, as well as an operator of 747-200SUD (which is technically  not a -300).  One of the plane was a 747-200 that was in a fire and later rebuilt by Boeing into a 747-200SUD.
Archtrain 19:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion

message: 26 December 1958, F-BGTZ, Salisbury (Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland)	
Here is the French translation of the Rhodesian report on the crash: http://www.bea.aero/docspa/1958/f-tz581226/pdf/f-tz581226.pdf 
* Archive: http://www.webcitation.org/5zlSLeOa6
The original Rhodesian crash report nay be is in "ICAO Accident Digest, Circular 59-AN/54 (240-245)" - You can get it from a resource request
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: UAT crash in 1958
Talk:Cartan connection

message: The last formal definition in the article introduces the induced G-connection on the associated bundle E with typical fiber G/H and claims that this construction is  equivalent to the Cartan connection on P, and links to the page explaining how to reconstruct a principal bundle from an associated bundle. But that page correctly emphasizes that to be able to  reconstruct a principal bundle, the G-action on the typical fiber needs to be effective. However, the action on G/H is generally not effective, so you can’t recover the Cartan connection from E. In other words, the last definition works only for effective Klein geometries G/H. (By the way, the existence of a G-connection is irrelevant to the ability to do this, contrary to the language in the article). Blackmail1807 (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Definition as an Ehresmann connection” is wrong?
Talk:Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics

message: I am writing this link here, because I think that it is important for the society to see and to be able to stop the actions that are destroying science: https://sites.google.com/site/saveitep/together
This is some text from the webpage.
Russian physicists Prof. Alexander Gorsky, Prof. Alexey Morozov, Prof. Pavel Pakhlov appeal to your attention.
Kindly see below translations of extracts from their open letter to the Russian media and civil society http://afrikanbo.livejournal.com/119335.html:
”...Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), one of the leading Russian scientific centers that has sustained during the last two decades its reputation, honor and prestige, is practically going to cease its existence. The Institute has striven for its existence for years against the Government; this unequal struggle has amazed many experienced administrators and politicians...
ITEP still occupies the leading position among other scientific centers in Russia, which is unbiasedly confirmed by highest index of citation of works written by ITEP's scientists...
...The current form of merging ITEP and Kurchatov Institue that has been approved by President Dmitry Medvedev is an obvious mistake. It would have been difficult to imagine that the goal of the president were elimination of ITEP and expropriation of the 370,000 square meters land plot in Moscow where the Institute resides. However it is the land seizure that is happening right now. This is how Russia is going to proceed into the bright innovative future advocated frequently by President Medvedev during his presidential term: without the scientists, without the education, in a shameful and dishonorable way...” 
Thank you!
99.255.29.92 (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign "Save ITEP"
Talk:Confluence Project

message: I suspect either both words should have lower-case initials or both should be capitalized.  Thoughts? Michael Hardy 18:16, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Prevention of Terrorism Acts

message: The exclusion orders were used by the British government to ban prominent Sinn Fein MPs like Gerry Adams to enter Great Britain, and was later held to ban the broadcast of their voices on television and radio.
Was the latter part done under the exclusion orders?  In my original version I didn't make that claim, just that the act did. Morwen 18:37, Dec 23, 2003 (UTC)
: (almost 10 years later) How did this even work?  Gerry Adams and McGuiness were British citizens yet they were forbidden from entering other parts of what the UK Government would call 'the same country'.  Do any powers like this still exist?  It just seems so odd just as it would if an English person were banned from entering Wales.--ЗAНИA talk WB talk] 20:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was wondering how we'd handle this now. Wouldn't it be better to call this one Prevention of Terrorism Acts (1974-1989) or something? Whilst they were introduced and mainly used to deal with Irish terrorism, I'm not sure it's the best or most encyclopædic title we could use… — OwenBlacker 01:07, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
: Prevention of Terrorism Acts (Northern Ireland) would be fine IMO. We should probably have articles on all the Acts in the end, of course...
: James F. (talk) 15:16, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Micromachinery

message: Shouldn't this page include some links to nanotechnology and/or microsystem science? I don't know that much about the subject, so I didn't put them in myself, but I'm sure there is a link. -- till we *) 19:22, Dec 23, 2003 (UTC)
I created a page for bulk and surface micromachining, using the information given on this page, as well as new material. So I removed that info from this page, leaving the links. Now the page keeps focused on micromachinery, without the rather off-topic discussion about surface and bulk u-machining Glaurung 15:27, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of kings of Iraq

message: "...the province of Iraq came under the control of the United Kingdom."  
Iraq was formed from the three Ottoman provinces of Mosul, Baghdad and Basrah.  There was no Ottoman province called "Iraq".Fsotrain09 02:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I created  as I saw a need for it on WP. With dozens of articles having dozens of different ways of presenting the same information, it can be confusing or even frustrating for the reader, not knowing, upon reaching a "List of..." page, how the table is to be read, or finding, for example, that some tables provide dynasty or lifespan data but others don't.
Therefore, can I ask why the addition of the table in this article was reverted, especially to a version that gives less information than the new one? ClaretAsh 11:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession table

message: Which of the following two succession tables best presents a summary of the kings of Iraq?
#Option 1, or
#Option 2
ClaretAsh 13:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC - which succession table? 

message: Photographs trump paintings. Color photos trump B&W ones.Ericl (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: pictures
Talk:Vance and Nettie Palmer

message: What are the arguments for and against having Vance and Nettie Palmer (single article) versus Vance and Nettie Palmer (i.e. two seperate articles)? --Sam
In Australia they have been invariably treated as a couple, there are three biographies and several works of lit crit, all treating them as a couple. We could have redirects from Vance Palmer and Nettie Palmer. Adam 00:37, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree, though very late in the piece.  I'll see what I can come up with. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

text: Separate (non-directing) pages have now been created for both Vance Palmer and Nettie Palmer.  If there are no objections within the next week I'll request that the "Vance and Nettie Palmer" page be deleted from the wiki. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If you took content from this page, deletion would be strictly impossible, since it would be needed to maintain an author list for attribution, per the licence.  (And you need to note that content was taken from here in the editor summaries of the split pages). WilyD 23:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay, that makes sense. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of political parties in Italy

message: During the transition from the old organisation of the list to the current one, several contents were lost. In order to restore some of that material, I started two articles: List of political coalitions in Italy and List of parliamentary groups in Italy. In my view, the former should be expanded by adding some text and all government coalitions, which are different from electoral ones (even though, to be precise, some electoral coalitions become government coalitions too), while the second should be expanded by adding all parliamentary groups, possibly organised in tables (possible columns: name, dates, Chamber of Deputies, Senate, leaders, etc.). Contributions are welcome. -- Checco (talk) 22:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakaway lists 
Talk:David Marr

message: Just to clarify, is this the David Marr who is a professor of Vietnamese history at the Australian National University, or some other David Marr??  JackofOz 22:29, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by what links here, it's a fellow involved in AI. - Hephaestos 22:55, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fellowship of the Rosy Cross

message: No link to Rosicrucians? Wetman 23:08, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

message: Dear user Goblin, the article Fellowship of the Rosy Cross you purpose to be merged is POV about a modern group which is stated, and linked, already at the related Modern groups section: AMORC (which entitles themselves as the real Order; which is their own POV). If you'd like to merge it, you should do it into the article about this refered modern organization and not in the article about the Rosicrucian Order ("Rosicrucian") - legend, history, movement, 19th/20th century modern groups, etc. - presented in a NPOV way. Following this explanation I'm reverting the merge tag. Regards, --212.113.164.104 16:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand how this article managed to remain the way it was for so long! The Fellowship of the Rosy Cross has nothing to do with AMORC, as the above comment explains. As such I've reverted the article to a version that's two years old. Someone please take the  recent incorrect text and move it to a new article with the appropriate name. Not Fellowship of the Rosy Cross. I don't know what the appropriate name is if it's not Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis; I'll leave someone else to figure that out. Fuzzypeg☻ 01:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-directing stub-article into Rosy Cross article which already has reference to Arthur Edward Waite. --Lusitanian 00:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fellowship of the Rosy Cross
Talk:2008 United States presidential election

message: Change John McCains picture Wooducus (talk) 22:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. To what? Also check out WP:Image Use Policy if you have a particular image in mind Cannolis (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2023 

message: why locked this page? 71.223.132.65 (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  why locked?
Talk:Glenn Ponder

message: This page needs to be moved. The correct spelling is clearly Glen Ponder (with one n in Glen), as in one episode Alan Partridge points out that it is an anagram of "Porn Legend". Pedantic, but true :) The BBC website is inconsistent - see  where it uses both spellings, but only the "Glen" spelling works with the anagram.
===Glenn Ponder===
The BBC website may be inconsistent, but the programme's credits are not. The screenshot below clearly shows "Glenn Ponder" with two Ns. I think "porn legend" is meant as a joke to show Partridge's lack of intelligence.
Java13690 18:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glen Ponder 

message: The BBC website may be inconsistent, but the programme's credits are not. The screenshot below clearly shows "Glenn Ponder" with two Ns. I think "porn legend" is meant as a joke to show Partridge's lack of intelligence.
Java13690 18:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Glenn'' Ponder
Talk:Juanita Millender-McDonald

message: Carson City, California?  There's a Carson, California and a Carson City, Nevada, but I don't know of any Carson City, California.  RickK 04:03, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Sentence needs to be rephrased for clarity. That part of the sentence should be stated as "a member of the City Council of Carson, California".... lwalt 06:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification

message: The license for the full text appears to me too restrictive for inclusion here. Perhaps permission could be asked for and granted?
Iraq ratification in 2010, someone update the map please  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.125.128.96 (talk) 00:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Can someone update the image to include Iraq as green (joined in 2010), and Canada as red (withdrew in 2013). Thanks... --Kuzwa (talk) 00:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: Suggesting that we change the colours used on the map, as those shades of red/green should be avoided due to confusion caused by colourblindness. I can hardly distinguish them. --Connelly90 09:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Colours
Talk:Plastic

message: turtles love plastic so im asking that 91.217.58.9 (talk) 09:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:REFDESK. (CC) Tbhotch™ 00:27, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's very harmful to consume plastic for the turtle as it will secret chemical bodies into the stomach which is very harmful 157.41.250.186 (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  is plastic safe to consume 

message: Add Extrusion to the Converting subsection of Plastic Industries. It is a common and well-known manufacturing method that is used for tubes and small components. There is even an article here! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_extrusion StrategicTuna (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2023 

message: Add link to Plasticosis article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasticosis) at the relevant paragraph under 'Health Effects'. Buuvfohjiqdjv (talk) 10:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2023 

message: Please remove the errant ref tag in the fifth bullet in the section "Decomposition of plastics." Thank you. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 23:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2024 

message: Ubleck is good for your imune system. You can eat it. 138.217.205.190 (talk) 01:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubleck
Talk:Seigneurial system of New France

message: The description is good, but a simple illustration of a typical seigneurie layout (with several seigneuries included) would be a great addition.
Twas Now 05:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I thought it was an adaptation of the remnants of the feudal system, based on the specific geography and circumstances of the St. Lawrence River. But I don't really know about 17th century French peasants or whatever :) Adam Bishop 08:32, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the first couple of sentences to mention the broader use, but (at least for now) left the article otherwise intact. Jmabel 09:55, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: There's an article on Intendant and another on the Intendant System that I think should be considered for merging, or at least cross referencing.  I'm not so concerned about the 'Intendant' article as I am about the 'Intendant System' article that is currently proposed to be merged into it.  Some high level consideration is definitely in order. --Chaleur 19:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well they should be cross-referenced, but this should definitely NOT be merged into the Intendant article. Adam Bishop 15:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Intendant
Talk:STS-107

message: The Mission Statistics table gives the Orbit Inclination as 40.3 degrees, but the Mission Parameters section of the article gives the Inclination as 39.0 degrees.  Can someone please fix/explain this?  --NoPetrol 02:34, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclination contradiction 

message: I heard here that the Enya song "Silver Inches" was played.
: Dear  76.16.151.77, it really was played for the astronauts, at least according to the Chronology of Wake-up calls used as a source in most other spaceflight articles. For whatever reason, this article doesn't have its own wake-up calls section yet, so I'd figure I'd make one. I'll start a draft table below. --SpacePod9 (talk) 06:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Enya Song Played for Blue Team

message: This version of the STS-107 article on the Slovak wikipedia is actually a featured article, and it has some nice details, images, and archived links, including the ones for the WAV files of the wake-up call recordings. Here it is (https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-107), though I'm not sure how much of it was directly translated from this English wikipedia page (and the Columbia disaster page) or if its in an original tone. I can't read or write Slovak so I couldn't tell ya without Google Translate. SpacePod9 (talk) 06:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slovak Wikipedia Page Article
Talk:Judaism/Archive 3

message: Could someone add a part about shunning ? I think it should go under "Who is a Jew" (since clearly after being shunned, one is neither "still considered to be a Jew in good-standing in the Jewish community" nor can one be judged according to the Jewish Law). It is of some importance since it applied to such people as Spinoza, but I don't know enough myself to contribute (why it is decided, who decides it, how it is applied - I also think it has some specific name but cannot remember it). François
:Good idea; I have now added a section to this article which deals with Cherem (Jewish excommunication), and created an article which examines this topic in more detail. I also have added a link to this new article in our articles on Excommunication and Shunning. RK 17:35, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! Amazing work. Thanks. François 14:13, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excommunication