Talk:Operation Yellow Ribbon

message: Please note that the airport in Montreal was Montréal-Dorval International Airport, not "Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport" when 9/11 happened. Also, please note that the customs agency was Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, not "Canada Border Services Agency." Jean Chrétien was the prime minister of Canada, not Stephen Harper. This article, as well as the links must reflect what it was when 9/11 happened, even though the links may redirect. -- SNIyer12
:How many times do I have to mention that both the article and the links must reflect 9/11? Users are changing it. I want this article, as well as the links to reflect what it was when 9/11 happened, even though the links may redirect. -- SNIyer12, 02:32, November 28, 2005 (UTC)
-because it is your own policy, not wikipedia policy. Text uses name at the time, but wikipedia policy is that links should go DIRECTLY to article, not redirect --JimWae 03:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparing 9/11 with present

message: Ben, How come you haven't worked on the Pacific flights section? I would like to know because I may have to work on it. -- SNIyer12 15 July 2005 17:41 (UTC)
I saw recently that an anonymous user (207.61.25.34) added that a handful of trans-Pacific flights were diverted further inland to Calgary. That user must understand that there were also trans-Atlantic flights, mostly bound for destinations on the U.S. west coast, that were diverted to Calgary, the CBC reported. The user must also understand what both Peter Gregg, communications chief for the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA), which runs Lester B. Pearson International Airport said in a news conference, and DeNeen Brown of The Washington Post reported: Planes landed all over Canada, depending where they were coming from, how much fuel they had, and the nearest airport for diversion. SNIyer12 16:24 26 July 2005 (UTC).
I was in Winnipeg at the time and I saw with my own eyes jets from Korea land, the biggest ones. Winnipeg International Airport does have the ability to take the very biggest airplanes. It has one runway long enough and we did take in the big aircraft incoming from the Pacific. Winnipeg also has a maintenance base that takes in every kind of airplane for full overhauls from all around the world. The story is incorrect when it says that pacific inbound planes could only land in Vancouver due to the runway. It may have been an issue of fuel because Winnipeg is in the centre of the continent but it was not runways.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjorklund21 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pacific flights section

message: Please do NOT mention in the Pacific flights section that there were trans-Pacific flights that landed in Calgary and Edmonton. There were trans-Atlantic flights that landed at both airports.
I've mentioned this before, users MUST understand what both Peter Gregg, communications chief for the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA), which runs Lester B. Pearson International Airport said in a news conference, and DeNeen Brown of The Washington Post reported: It's not how many flights an airport received, nor was it where the planes landed. It depended on several factors: where it was coming from, how much fuel it had, and the nearest airport for diversion. NAV CANADA also said the same thing. It is also in the article. SNIyer12 15:10 11 February 2006 (UTC).
: SNIyer12, I'm not sure I understand your request.  Previous to your deletion, the article said:  However, a limited number of trans-Pacific flights flew inland to land at Calgary, Edmonton and Whitehorse. Other flights which were still further out over the ocean at the time were diverted to Anchorage, Alaska, and other airports along the North Pacific route, such as Osaka in Japan.  Is that fact incorrect?
: Also, why have you archived all the comments in the talk page?  Discussions leading up to the current revision are useful for those new to the article (like myself), and the talk page was not very long at all. 
: Just curious.  Thanks!  --Ds13 17:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ds13, I ordered that deletion because there were trans-Atlantic flights that landed at both Calgary and Edmonton. This article is about what happened in Canada, in terms of flight diversions. You also have to understand that planes landed all over Canada, depending where they were coming from and how much fuel they had. -- SNIyer12, 01:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where flights landed in Canada

message: I have removed  from this article as an irrelevance.  How does this article describe a "military conflict"?  Also, listing "Combatants: Canada" is silly: there weren't any "combatants".  If anyone objects, please discuss it here before putting it back.  --RFBailey 18:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military conflict infobox 

message: :Image:LesterBPearsonInternationalAirportSecurity911.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:LesterBPearsonInternationalAirportSecurity911.jpg

message: Any idea what happened to flights coming from South America, did they stop in Mexico, Bahamas?? 206.104.165.162 (talk) 21:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flights coming from South America 

message: If possible, could this article include pictures of all planes lined up in canadian airports? I know it's hard to get them but I saw some of them in the airliners.net database and I thought they would show the magnitude of the emergency.
thank you, 93.34.32.18 (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  more pictures 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Operation Yellow Ribbon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111015060815/http://canada.usembassy.gov/canada-us-relations/thank-you-canada:-remembering-9/11/9-september-2011:-president-obama-s-letter-to-canada-on-the-10th-anniversary-of-9/11.html to http://canada.usembassy.gov/canada-us-relations/thank-you-canada:-remembering-9/11/9-september-2011:-president-obama-s-letter-to-canada-on-the-10th-anniversary-of-9/11.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.navcanada.ca/NavCanada.asp?Language=en&Content=ContentDefinitionFiles%5CNewsroom%5CBackgrounders%5C911crisis.xml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: can we include the meaning behind the name?68.150.74.106 (talk) 05:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  yellow ribbon name origin