lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sankar Chatterjee

message: This page looks very much as if it was created by its subject (Mr Chatterjee) or someone otherwise affiliated with him.
Is there a reason for it to exist?  Does one have a page for all scientists, even if not of major influence?
81.62.15.144 20:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no sources whatsoever in the article. According to the policy for biographical material on living persons, I really see no reson to keep this article.  I suggest quick deletion.81.62.0.236 08:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added sources a little while back. →Wordbuilder (talk) 13:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: Mr Chatterjee also holds Degree in IBM. Kingalok (talk) 10:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Degree

message: There was some turmoil about a presumed "Proaves". What happened? ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 15:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore my stmt! It's in the article as Protoavis. ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 15:20, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proaves?

message: Shouldn't this article be updated with Dr Chatterjee's recent publicity arising from his Shiva thesis (see article in The Economist)? --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think it should be. →Wordbuilder (talk) 02:10, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I am happy to put something in, but I have no expertise in this field.  Is there someone with the right background who could do a better job? --Legis (talk - contribs) 10:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Gerta Keller disagrees (). --Chris.urs-o (talk) 09:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Shiva theory
Talk:Adjudication

message: This topic is too distinct from other forms of dispute resolution, and it would require too much out of the dispute resolution article.Manney 18:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: don't merge

message: This page might be improved by reference to statutory and contractual construction adjudication ouside Australia.  See for instance s.108 in Part II of the UK Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and the Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998 -- S.I. 1998 No. 649. Salisian (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadened scope 

message: This page exists in Portuguese: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjudica%C3%A7%C3%A3o
I'm sorry, I don't know how to connect the pages in different languages. If someone can tell me how that would be great because I always run into Portuguese pages and English pages that aren't connected (I'm a translator BTW).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.81.244.60 (talk) 21:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  connect with Portuguese page 

message: Nowhere on Wikipedia is there mention of this. There is a lot of misunderstanding on this topic. If anyone else would collaborate with me on making a withheld judgment page, I would gladly like to do so. 184.99.84.124 (talk) 18:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding adjudication withheld
Talk:The Walt Disney World Explorer

message: I have removed the tables that exhaustively document the contents of this software because they appear to be original research and impact the readability of the article. The tables contain unsourced information that goes beyond the scope of the article and is better documented elsewhere (e.g. the current operating status of every attraction at Disney World). The tables were copied from the Disney FANDOM wiki, which is the proper venue for this sort of minutia. Uncle Dick (talk) 00:11, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Tables
Talk:Santha Rama Rau

message: The genealogy about her ex-husband Faubion Bowers is interesting to me because he was a 2nd cousin of mine, but I wonder whether it violates privacy to be naming his living descendents. Scott Tillinghast, Houston TX 18:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wild 9

message: Ugh. Whoever wrote this article clearly doesn't understand how wikipedia works. Informal tones up the ass, a plot section that reads like a fanfic and has more words than a college graduate thesis, uninformative and inappropriate diction... come on, people, let's clean this up where we can. PsychoJosh (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a rewrite

message: Less of the story copied directly out of the instruction book, shorter revised version would be nice, and a few more pictures.
If I was to volenteer, would the original contributer(s)
Allow me to condense the page? and explain more about the worlds (levels) and enemies?
And make it look less like it was copied right out of the instruction book?!--Fr3k3r 12:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organising 

message: I've got some concerns over the recent additions to the article. I worked hard at cleaning out all of the old WP:COPYVIO/unsourced content, and now very similar content is being re-added.
* Much of the info being added about the characters sounds like its ripped right out of a manual or guidebook. That's not acceptable, its a copyright violation. Content should be provided with a reliable source and should be paraphrased. 
*Also, some parts have leftover "[6]" type things in text, suggesting it may have been ripped from a Wikia or something? Because they're not linking to actual sources. Its just literally that text.
* Content should be written like an encyclopedia entry. Many of the recent changes refer to a "you" or talk very informally, like friends chatting or something. That's not how things are written here.
* A well sourced review from GameSpot, a source considered reliable by consensus at where we determine if sources are usuable, keeps being removed without explanation.
This is why I keep removing the changes. Sergecross73 msg me  16:06, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions
Talk:Santiago Fujimori

message: Does Santiago Fujimori have any children? I haven't been able to find any record of them, but I'm sure he does.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickeleh (talk • contribs) 19:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children? 

message: If I agree to deliver said license, as long as I obtain said contribution. 132.157.131.226 (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continue registration 

message: Acepto 132.157.131.222 (talk) 20:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuar
Talk:Trivia (mythology)

message: to Artemis (who, by the way, is the counterpart of Diana); the article explicitly states that she is a three-faced goddess of crossroads, exactly like Hecate.  I'm also going to remove the section about the poem, as it already has its own page that is noted on the disambiguation page for Trivia.--The Great Honker 18:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Diana was also considered to be a goddess of the crossroads, which is probably why she was conflated with Hecate in the first place (or, maybe more likely, Hecate picked up her association with crossroads thanks to being merged with Diana, who did not have a separate name for her "underworld" aspect at the time). I can't find any sources that seriously discuss Trivia as anything but an epithet of Diana, I don't think she was ever a goddess in her own right. If you have any sources to the contrary please add them! Dinoguy2 (talk) 17:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

message: Every scholarly source I can find treats Trivia as an epithet of Diana and or Hecate. Other than a few pop encyclopedias, are there any reliable sources treating her as a distinct goddess? If not this seems like it should be a redirect. Dinoguy2 (talk) 23:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epithet of Diana
Talk:Beverly Glen, Los Angeles

message: If you type "Seabury Lane, Los Angeles, CA" into Google maps you will see that you are in the middle of what looks like a large tract development. There's a grid of streets and lots. Only a few of those were developed and even with the developed streets Google has some intersecting, etc. that don't in reality.
From what I recall, at one time a food company (Kelloggs?) had bought that part of the canyon, created the divisions you can see on today's Google map, and gave away the lots in a contest. Many of the lots were too small for a normal house meaning people would buy and consolidate several lots to build in the area.
It's possible the development was built out and then destroyed in a fire such as in 1959 or 1961. I lived there as a child in the early 1970s and there were many foundations in the hills where the houses had burned and never been replaced.
I looked in Google News from 1/1/1500 to 1/1/1930 but did not see anything meaning reliable sources for this bit of history would be from on or after 1/1/1930 and before 1/1/1970. --Marc Kupper|talk 22:51, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central canyon history
Talk:Lucius Munatius Plancus

message: Hello there! DPRR reports that Plancus was moneyer not only once but twice! The applicable RRC entries apparently are 475 (for coins in 45 BC) and 522 (for coins in 40 BC). Could you aid me in finding them? (I've already added a source entry for Crawford RRC by the way.) Ifly6 (talk) 07:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and his brother minted too, but I'll wit for you to expand the article a bit so I can better link the pictures to the text. T8612 (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moneyer
Talk:Santiago Solari

message: La Gazzetta dello Sport claimed Solari terminated his contract with Real Madrid in order to join Inter on free transfer. However in the audited report Solari had cost Inter €6 million, then whom received that? Matthew_hk tc 11:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In January 2003 La Gazzetta claimed that his contract would expire in 2005. which in July 2007 the above article claimed that Solari was included in Ronaldo deal. Matthew_hk tc 11:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: AS claimed his price tag in June 2005 was €8 million, while the news on 8 July claimed the fee was undisclosed. However on 7 July it was alleged that Inter offered €2 million but Real €3 million, as i rely on Google Translate, It refer to transfer fee or wage? Matthew_hk tc 10:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfer fee
Talk:Santino Quaranta

message: Photo taken from Flickr (url = http://www.flickr.com/photos/brandonhirsch/2542947515/).
Author is Flickr user, vassego. 
Image is free to use/share, free to remix/edit.
Image may not be used for commercial purposes.  Atouraya (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image added
Talk:Seventeenth Dynasty of Egypt

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tenth dynasty of Egypt - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: This users/user have been importing original research and misrepresenting the cited sources. None of the sources state that "there is no direct evidence that the founder of the Seventeenth Dynasty was Nubian", the sources simply describe the dynasty as Theban but do not comment or reject the evidence from some scholars that they may have been of Nubian origin. I have revised the sources in light of what is actually stated that in the sources. However, this user is adding to their interpretation to the sources which do not make this claim which is original research to push forward their POV which violates Wikipedia guidelines. I have warned them consistently that this disruptive editing, original research and continuing this will escalate with them being reported to admin noticeboard. Also, I am looking for recommendations from other users on this ?WikiUser4020 (talk) 04:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Warring: User 41.232.92.114 and 197.61.29.150
Talk:Global Analyst Research Settlements

message: The section labeled as a 'background' seemed to simply be a list of randomly selected cases of sec actions and questionable corporate activity that does not seem to add any understanding of the actual article.  A short, neutral summary of the settlement's background would suffice; but it is unclear as to how the list actually impacts the subject.  The 'By 2006, marketplace ethics reached a new low, according to a Wikipedia contributor.' is completely unacceptable uncited commentary.  Please use this talk page if you need help in re-writing this. Kuru talk 22:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background section removed 

message: The background section is a complete and comprehensive list of recent actions that are directly related to the article. This list does not exist anywhere else in Wiki. Given the list, the statement 'By 2006, marketplace ethics reached a new low, according to a Wikipedia contributor.' is a fact. Again, simply because you think it is a "completely unacceptable uncited commentary." does not make it so. Cirm 14:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, it's clearly your own personal commentary, and completely unacceptable in an encyclopedic entry.  I would strongly encourage you to read more about what Wikipedia is and look the policies on verifiability, original research, and neutral point of view.  Please understand that this is not a place for personal editorials.  All statements must be factual and cited, and self-reference to 'a wikipedia contributor' is not helpful. Kuru talk 00:39, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The list is a copyright violation. As I explained to you earlier, you can't simply give away copyright status here; there's no evidence that you have the authority to do so. Kafziel Talk 14:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please point specifically to the copyright violation by providing a link to the referenced copywritten text.Cirm 14:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If the list and the wording is your own creation and has been published on your personal website, it does create legal issues which cannot be resolved by us - I believe that Mr. Kafziel has already helped you by pointing out the directions to release this into the public domain or by contacting wikipedia counsel.  If the list is verbatim testimony; simply cite the source that we can verify.  Honestly, I could care less - I still do not think it is helpful to the article.  Again, I would ask that you summarize the salient points; a lengthy list of semi-related factoid only serves to confuse the intent of what is supposed to be an encyclopedia entry. Kuru talk 00:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background section restored
Talk:Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus (father of Nero)

message: I don't know who keeps reverting the page to include this picture of the Ara Pacis, but not since 1987 has any scholar attributed that frieze to Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus.  Think about it: The Ara Pacis was completed on 9 BC, commissioned in 13 BC.  Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus would have been 40 something years old when he was made Consul, which was in 32 AD, if this was the case.  That's insane.  Hence, that cannot be Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus.  Please stop adding that false information onto the page.
If you need me to dig out the article that will corroborate this information, please do, but it seems obvious if you look at it math.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.14.204 (talk) 02:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ara Pacis Picture

message: The article gives a very precise birthdate: 11 December 17 BC. Does anyone know the origin of this date? It fits in well with the dates of Domitius's two sisters, who were born in c 17 BC and c 10 BC according to the other Wikipedia articles (although since Domitius's date appears to be invented, I suppose those may be as well).
On the other hand, Barrett in his biography of Agrippina calculates that he may have been born in about 2/1 BC, since he was consul in 32 AD (p. 44). If there was any record of Domitius having been born in 17 BC, I'm sure Barrett would mention it.
I don't know anything about the figures on the Ara Pacis, which is discussed above, but if Domitius was born in 17, he would have been 8 when the altar was finished. According to the article on Antonia Major (his mother), the two children are Domitius and his elder sister Domitia Lepida, who would have been 8 and 10 when the altar was finished. The two children certainly look as if they're about that age - on the other hand, I don't know what the basis is for their identification. Since Antonia Major was born in c. 39 BC, she would have been 20 when Domitia Lepida was born, and 22 when Domitius was born. That sounds reasonable and likely. While if he was born around 2/1 BC, she would have been around 38, which is also possible. Anna Lowenstein (talk) 08:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate 

message: Does the bust depict our man? This site (http://ancientrome.ru/art/artworken/img.htm?id=3428) claims that the bust resembles a portrait on coin minted by Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus (not the subject of this article, but his grandfather, cos. 32 BC) - coins like this (https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1844-0425-467-A). It's true that the Vatican museum calls it a bust of Ahenobarbus, cos. 32 AD, but there's no known likeness of him, and the portrait on coins seems to depict an ancestor of the minter, so I fail to see any link between the man depicted on this bust and Nero's father. I looked for any concrete claim of this bust being a depiction of Nero's father, but I found nothing - except the claim that the bust resembles a man depicted on the coins minted by Nero's great-grandfather Tiberio Cesare (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 20:36, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bust
Talk:Saori Yoshida

message: Kind of ironic how there is a Chinese flag in the backround. --Ilias Of Nikos Iliadis (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now been cropped. Shawnc (talk) 13:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture 
Talk:Brother Industries

message: I owned several Brother industrial double-needle lockstitch machines as early as 1994.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.184.143.229 (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother commercial multi-needle machines earlier than 2003 

message: For historical completeness, if someone has information about the special Brother GCR encoding used by 120/240 KB 3.5-inch diskette drives in early Brother word processor typewriters of the WP and LW series in the 1980s/1990s, please add it to the group-coded recording article (or the talk page). Thanks.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 16:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother GCR code
Talk:Sapardi Djoko Damono

message: The article is currently being rewritten as part of a collaboration between WikiMedia Indonesia and the Lontar Foundation (see Signpost coverage). Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Declaration
Talk:Saqlain Mushtaq

message: 58.65.197.251 07:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Seriously? Damn. Need to find a good pic for this great legend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.154.179.46 (talk) 11:22, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Picture? 

message: Request to specify the meaning of the abbreviation BND which is mentioned after his full name. Mkbeth (talk) 13:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "BND"
Talk:Sara Douglass

message: I'd like to start creating pages for the remaining books in the Axis Trilogy and the books in the Wayfarer Redemption Trilogy, but unfortunately, I don't know where to find the publication information for the first editions of the novels published in Australia.  Without this information, I won't even be able to make a proper infobox, so I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?  There's no Amazon Australia as there is an Amazon UK, but perhaps someone knows of an Australian online retailer with extensive information on the books they sell...
(I could create complete infoboxes for the US editions of the novels, but I've run into this issue before, and by now I know to stick to the original publications).
Thanks for your help, Runch 03:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a bunch! Due to a busy schedule, I probably won't get around to writing those pages for a while, but your information should prove to be a great help. - Runch 16:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication Information 

message: Sara Douglass died today
From her official facebook page :"It is Karen Brooks here. It is with the greatest sadness that I am writing to let you know that Sara Douglass Warneke died this morning at around 5am. The universe is a little darker today and I know you will share my unbelievable sorrow. She loved you all and I know you loved her in return and that love comforted her in her final days. xxxx"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.59.200.202 (talk) 21:40, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her death 

message: Shouldn't that be "....until mid-2000..."?  As written it seems to refer to the years 2040->2060 or thereabouts. Arcanicus (talk) 01:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as the mid-1990s would be 1995, the mid-2000s would be 2005. But I see your point and clarity of a particular year would be better. WWGB (talk) 01:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Until the mid-2000s, she hosted..."
Talk:Lockheed CP-140 Aurora

message: The Arcturus seems to be only a subvariant of the Aurora, basically the same aircraft just lacking the ASW capabilities. --Denniss 18:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[CP-140A Arcturus]] merge into this article

message: The introduction here informes us that: "In Greek mythology, Aurora is the Greek goddess who restored Orion's eyesight, and also the Aurora Borealis are the "northern lights" that are prominent over northern Canada and the Arctic Ocean".
Is any of that relevant? And if it is (some allusion to the aircraft's function, perhaps, or an explanation of why it was named so (in which case it would need a reference to confirm it)) should it be in the introduction? It's hardly the most significant fact about the plane, is it?
And I assume the CP-140A was named for the star Arcturus (or one of these; the rock band, maybe?): Does that need mentioning as well? Moonraker12 (talk) 17:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: One might assume that Aurora, being an Orion with updated S-3 systems, is aptly named - perhaps surprisingly so. Definitely informative and indeed one of the few times that Wiki has actually provided some useful information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.17 (talk) 18:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I cannot find any reference to this but I wonder whether the Kawasaki P-1 was considered? I know that the UK did look at the type for their own MPA programme.
Gentleman wiki (talk) 23:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement?
Talk:Marcus Valerius Messala Barbatus

message: Messala Barbatus may not be the same Messala who was consul in 20. I don't know what PIR, 2nd ed. has to say about the matter, but Ronald Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy treats them as if they are 2 different people. The matter needs more research. -- llywrch (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Verrius Flaccus

message: The De Orthographia and the Catonis were separate works; at least the editor(s) of the fragments as given at the Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum (cited) think so.  I will try to separate them, but I'm not sure I know how to work the bullet-points...
Mjhrynick (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?