lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paria, Gujarat

message: hi dear Dev dasai. I am Paria form Iran.Acctually i googled my name and find out that it is a village in 
India.My name means fairy in my language (persian).That was very intresting to know that paria is also a village. I knew that paria is a canion in Usa As well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.185.100.5 (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  paria
Template talk:History of religion

message: This template is under construction. Octopus-Hands 11:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Remove the contentious Ayyavazhi. It is neither an oficial religion (relgally classiied as denomination o Hinduism), nor all its adherants to be seperate religion (most o them self-identy as Hindus) except limited number of people "motivated by personal gains". There are hundreds of such smaller cults wanting to be independent religions. We can not insert "anyhow" allow hundreds of these smaller and relatively obscure denominations of the official religions to be inserted here with long-established and long-recognised religions. Please watch it and immediately remove such denomination. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Contentious Ayyavazhi cult is not a religion
Talk:Kamāl ud-Dīn Behzād

message: Content has been added to this page (most of the last paragraph) which seems to unnecessarily repeat the previous content. I'm not sure it adds any new relevant information, apart from perhaps the last couple sentences, which I think are arguable points (e.g. Bihzad's "naturalism" in his figures, considering that he often quoted figures verbatim from earlier works by other artists). If no one has a good reason it should stay, I will delete the paragraph, or else its new content should be merged with the rest of the entry.
Thanks.
Richard Tapestry 11:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An IP had changed Herat to Herat/Afghanistan, thus "killing" the Wiki-Link. I reverted that. Cheers. Tājik (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit 

message: This section provides valuable information, but it needs some work. Fixing some minor grammar problems is probably the best place to start, but there also seems to be some subjective descriptions and/or original research. Edits are needed to ensure objectivity, and sources are needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aslightrain (talk • contribs) 12:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career and Style
Talk:Taboo against naming the dead

message: Austronesian and Austro-Asiatic are two different families.  I know that the taboo exists in Austro-Asiatic but I don't know one way or the other about Austronesian so I am reverting it to the way it was.  I don't know the source for this information, all I have is an Encyclopedia Britannica article.  But I have no reason to believe it is untrue.  Haplolology 12:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: I've seperated the notes from the actual references for easier reading. One of the byproducts is that you get to know what's missing. If you look at the notes, some of the exact page numbers are missing. I've replaced them with "__" for now. Could people replace these with actual page numbers? Thanks. Sofeil 11:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page numbers

message: I believe a similar practice applies to Japanese Emperors, although I have no reference to supply. (Not a Wikipedia user, 26 March 2009)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.16.159.79 (talk) 18:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese Emperors?

message: Is this the reason why Death of the Endless in the Neil Gaiman comics is never referred to by name by her siblings? She's always referred to as "sister" or "our sister". If so can this be added as another example?  Swampy 58.165.181.8 (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query.
Talk:Daimler Majestic

message: I entered a picture of a Daimler Majestic to this article a few days ago.   However (at least to my eye) various UK Daimlers from this era look rather similar to one another and I'm not sure I correctly identified this car.  Is anyone able to corroborate or correct my identification, please?   Regards  Charles01 (talk) 10:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the vehicle database its Daimler 1955  with 2433CC engine --— Typ932T | C  21:56, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like it'snot the car I thought it was.   Probably much rarer than a Majestic.   But not suitable for this page.   Thank you.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 07:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be some version of Daimler Conquest which seems to have same capacity engine  --— Typ932T | C  07:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.   But which?   Anyhow, I've put a question on the Daimler talk page which might attract a reply from someone with specialist knowledge.   If it doesn't, I'd take 'Daimler Conquest' as the working assumption.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 08:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Self doubt
Talk:Daimler Conquest

message: What in the world is a video of Gamal Nasser doing on this page?  It makes no sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrunoSchwartz (talk • contribs) 02:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nasser almost cut off the entire supply of petrol to much of Europe leading to (amongst many other things, a new range of 2-cylinder BMWs that looked like this and) no or very few buyers for gas-guzzlers like Daimler and the Daimler business went into its terminal decline. This Conquest had been their idea of a mass market economy model. So the link is: Nasser shuts off petrol, Daimler dies. Eddaido (talk) 04:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, is there any documentation verifying this link?  Secondly, how does the video either illustrate or elucidate the link?  All it says is that Nasser closed the canal and that England and Egypt had frozen each others accounts, which could easily have been said in text. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nasser

message: "The writing on the wall for Daimler grew ever larger."
Does this mean that something was written on a wall and the font size increased continuously? Or does it mean "Daimler's problems became increasingly obvious"?  If it means the latter, then that should be used, as stated in the policy document WP:IDIOM.
Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 15:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clichés and idioms are generally to be avoided in favor of direct, literal expressions
Talk:Daimler Majestic Major

message: There are frequent comparisons in the article between the Majestic Major and the Jaguar Mark X. A reason for the comparison is insinuated rather than clearly stated; Jaguar, the parent company, introduced the Mark X  one month after the Majestic Major and both cars were similarly equipped. If the intention is to show that Jaguar was competing against its new subsidiary then this should be clearly stated and cited.
There are two specific things about the article that need to be cleared up:
#Is the passage in the "Introduction" section stating that the Majestic Major was faster than the Mark X up to 80 mph necessary when another passage in the "Performance" section gives data showing this to be true up to 100 mph?
#The aforemantioned acceleration data for the Majestic Major is cited as coming from an article in The Times issue 55682. While I do not doubt that the acceleration data given for the Majestic Major is from this source, can someone with access to the Times archive please check whether the Mark X data is from the same source? If it is not, could someone check whether the Mark X data is from the article in The Times issue 55210 that was cited as the source of the previous paragraph?
Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison with Jaguar Mark X
Talk:Daimler SP250

message: Has the resemblance of the front aspect styling to that of the Buick XP300 been noted anywhere in print or online that could be cited?Robocon1 (talk) 10:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think it looks all that similar - for instance the light units are very different. You could make a better case for it resembling the Morris Minor's front styling. RGCorris (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buick XP300 

message: A friend of mine told me there was a big fuss about the Dodge Dart and the Daimler Dart both using the same model name? Can anyone find a reliable source for this, and if so, it could be added to the article. Invertzoo (talk) 22:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodge Dart? 

message: The section "Common and uncommon modifications" looks more like it belongs on a DIY page than in an encyclopaedia. Should it be removed? Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopaedic section 

message: I notice B E Smith's book's index lists: SP250, see Dart
As I remember it the first car (the "prototype") was shown in the specialist magazines described as an exercise for apprentices made by them to be a testbed for the new engine. (No, I do not know offhand of a current source to refer to but it was no prototype, just a flying testbed) Design (B, C) came later if at all following the decision to make more — the initial decision to try to sell some of them was made by the managers of a rapidly disintegrating business hunting for any product whatsoever. (beautiful engine, new cheap fibreglass bodies, no capital investment, what's to lose?) The supplied reference Auto Lemon-Used Car History Check does seem an unworthy reference for an encyclopaedia and the reference to a TR3 should be removed or the cause explained. Eddaido (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins "frame based on the TR3"
Talk:Daimler V8 engines

message: Proposal submitted to establish consensus for or against. As per guidelines, consensus against, or failure to establish consensus, will result in the defeat of the proposal.
Proposal:
WHEREAS Daimler may have had earlier 2.5 litre engines, or earlier 4.5 litre engines, or both, than Turner's V8s,
AND WHEREAS Daimler is not likely to have made other V8 automobile engines before Turner's V8s (please correct me if I am wrong on this),
AND WHEREAS V8 engines used in Daimler automobiles after production of Turner's V8s ended would be Ford-era Jaguar V8s and not "Daimler V8s",
AND WHEREAS the term "Daimler V8 engine" is a more concise and more precise term for the subject(s) of the article,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the subject of the article would be better described as "Daimler V8 engine" than as "Daimler 2.5 & 4.5 litre",
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the article should be renamed "Daimler V8 engine".
Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. A very clearly presented case.  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest "Daimler V8 engines" (plural) would be more appropriate - although the two engines were broadly similar, I doubt if they had any common parts RGCorris (talk) 09:29, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Support. No objection. I was new to Wikipedia when I started that so the article naming is not concise.Seasalt (talk) 07:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from the cylinder bore, is there any difference between the engine blocks of the 2.5 and the 4.5?  I know they'd have different crankshafts for the different strokes, and probably different connecting rods as well, but were there any differences between the block castings? Based on what was in the article, I thought they were based on the same basic block, in a manner similar to the Chevrolet small-block engine. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 13:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Daimler V8 engine"? 

message: Why is there a mini-biography of Edward Turner in the article?  What purpose does it serve the article on Daimler 2.5 & 4.5 litre V8 engines? Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the purpose of the section "Edward Turner"?

message: Daimler 2.5 & 4.5 litre → Daimler V8 engines – Reasons for request given in Talk:Daimler 2.5 & 4.5 litre#Move to "Daimler V8 engine"?, as seen two sections above this one. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good, it's more natural. Wikipedia:Article titles has more info. Penyulap  ☏ 11:49, 22 Jul 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: An anonymous poster has just amended the article to state that the one engine cannot be bolted in place of the other. As I know there is at least one SP250 (in New Zealand) with a 4.5 engine this is not strictly accurate, although I assume there would probably be a need for modifications to the mountings etc rather than a straight swop. Can anyone clear this point up authoritatively ? RGCorris (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchangeable ?
Talk:TCM Underground

message: I appreciate your hard work in creating this, but I think it's violating the WP:NOT criteria. This page has no encyclopedic interest. It's just a program listing for a TV channel. It can also be considered promotional in the sense that we're mirroring the broadcast schedule of TCM which is easily available on their site. Sorry if this disappoints you, in future why not propose the idea on the TCM article and see if anyone chimes in with encouragement. David Spalding Talk/Contribs 14:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 

message: Without the schedule (which was removed while AfD was under discussion), this page now says little more (IMHO) than is already stated at Turner Classic Movies. How about some more detail about what's been focused on/discussed on teh program ... perhaps some background in why TCM chose Rob Zombie to host. Something that asserts why TCM Underground is unique, notable, of interest to a wide audience, and ultimately establishes its "context." Please be sure to include citations from third party publications (not just TCM marketing fluff). TIA — David Spalding ta!k y@wp/Contribs 17:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Ulyanovsk

message: There is also a Soviet-era military arsenal at Ulyanovsk, currently producing small arms ammunition for export.  Currently they export 7.62x39mm and 5.45x39mm rifle ammunition to the US in 20-round paper boxes printed with a camouflage pattern and the current importer to the US, as of late 2007, is "Wolf Ammunition" (previously it was "Sapsan" brand).  The Ulyanovsk plant has relatively new tooling, and Ulyanovsk ammunition is regarded as being much higher quality than Tula ("Wolf" in black boxes) and equivalent to Barnaul ("Brown Bear"), though not quite as good as Vympel ("Golden Tiger" brand).  Is this sufficiently noteworthy to put in the main article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.41.40.21 (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arsenal at Ulyanovsk? 

message: No offence intended, but the English used in this article is so bad that it is impossible to understand. As the language is so bad that it's not possible to understand what the authors have meant, it's not possible to correct it. Perhaps some Russian editor with a fluent command of English could have a look at the Russian site and use it as a basis for correcting the language here.JdeJ (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This is the English Wikipedia

message: I was in Ulyanovsk yesterday and have many pictures of several statues and historical sites (including Lenins House).  I also have pictures overlooking the Volga River and the bridge.  To answer the other posters question the second bridge is still under construction I also have a picture of that one but it is far off in the distance.  I usually only comment on articles that I am very familiar with but I don't have good experience/skills editing wikipedia pages so I was wondering if somebody could help me.  Also I am American and I didn't see a problem with the English in this article it seemed fine to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.66.16.7 (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firsthand Account
Talk:Apis (constellation)

message: Well if musca is shorter than apis my brain is a banana. The article may have been true in the Genesis, but have been changed into subtle contradiction. Rursus 12:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll say it myself to relieve others from that burden: my brain is banana obviously, but for the reason that Musca is Musca Australis abbreviated. Rursus 13:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shorten??

message: I now humbly request the merger of all information in Apis to Musca, while Apis (constellation) is reimplemented to #REDIRECT Musca#History.
My reason is:
Apis is not an obsolete constellation. Argumentation:
# Apis was the original name of Musca
# Cæla Sculptoris, the sculptor's chisel, was the original name on Caelum, the meaning of Caelum (heaven) being very different from Caela (chisel) - a change of meaning doesn't make a new constellation;
# Behold this picture over the southern polar region from http://www.atlascoelestis.com/ catalogue number 6) Joannis Hevelius, Uranographia, Danzig 1690, the little fly/bee at 2.45 o'clock made from four stars. 2.45 o'clock represents something between R.A. 12 and 13, where is today Musca. The four stars, I claim, are α, β, γ and δ Mus, see right thumbnail image.
Rursus declamavi;  22:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Rock the Spot

message: The Notability article states "A subject is notable if has been documented in multiple, non-trivial, independent, published sources". I plan on adding links to newspapers that have mentioned the event as well as seeing what MTV Canada has on Rock the Spot because they were there filming and doing interviews at RTS3. PS - I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm sorry if I'm not doing this "Talk Page" correctly. Kdazzle 12:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Papilio polytes

message: Why do some of these have elongated tails and others smoother ones? I've seen this in pics of both males and females. Compare:
 thumb|240px|right tks.  — Rlevse • Talk •  23:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tails

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Papilio polytes Mating.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 4, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-08-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Papilio polytes Mating.jpg]]
Talk:Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education

message: Seriously, this article needs to be rewritten very very badly.
Here's a list of sentences showing that this article needs rewriting, the bolding of words typically used in advertisements is added by me.
* "...is one of the key member institutions of VTC offering world-class vocational education to post secondary students in Hong Kong through its nine campuses lcoated across the territory."
* Well-trained graduates of IVE can either join the labour market to contribute to the society or choose to further their studies to obtain higher education qualifications.
* "Since its inception in 1982, VTC and its member institutions have been providing practical training programmes covering relevant knowledge and skills that are needed and valued in Hong Kong and beyond."
* "VTC draws strength from twelve of its member institutions, breadth of programmes and variety of accredited qualifications to provide a new world of opportunities to students of all ages and abilities. Championing a teaching and learning approach that is practical, hands-on and outcome-based, its ultimate aim does not only centre on the acquisition of knowledge and skills, but equally on action itself."
--173.51.115.6 (talk) 00:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I have NPOVed it. Nothing much left, though. olivier (talk) 19:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is written like [[WP:NOT#SOAPBOX|an advertisement]]. 
Talk:Cameroon line

message: There has got to be a map for this! --McTrixie/Mr Accountable 13:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cameroon line →  – Proper name should be capitalised. N. Mortimer (talk) 03:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 February 2023
Talk:Cynthia Gregory

message: To those who know her well enough, some minor cleanup is needed here:
* Needs infobox. See Help:infobox
* Couldn't find anything about "Zurich State Ballet"
* Couldn't find anything about New York Woman Magazine, so such an award might be real, or it might be quite unattributable. 
* The link to her Husband is a link to Lexis lawywer search; it makes no mention of their marriage. That should be fixed under WP:BLP guidelines. 
Otheus 17:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor problems 
Talk:Helen Latham

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 02:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Did this actress play the role of Cindy in Eastenders?  Surely that was Michelle Collins?
*After seeing your question here, I checked out the IMDB to clarify this situation.  You are right that  Michelle Collins played Cindy in Eastenders.  Helen Latham appears to have played another character of the same name though, appearing in five episodes during February and March 2003.  Must admit I don't remember this myself.  Paul from Brum (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role In Eastenders
Category talk:Wikipedians in Europe

message: I don't really like association the EU flag with whole Europe. The EU is no more than a relatively young international organisation running on a part of the territory of Europe. Even its citizens are more or less willing to identify with it. There should be something more neutral like the shape of the (sub)continent. Zbihniew 13:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The flag isn't only associated with the EU though. In fact, it was originally the flag of the older Council of Europe. See the European flag article. Cordless Larry 19:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: EU flag