lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anna of Kashin

message: This article appears to have been translated into English from another language (most likely Russian), or written by someone with a somewhat limited grasp of the English language (no offensive intended).  Some of the grammar does not follow correct syntax, and some areas are awkwardly worded. Trojan traveler 04:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: The beginning of the article says her birthdate is unknown, but it says on the side she was born in 1280. So I've added 1280 to the beginning. 24.31.169.252 (talk) 22:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth

message: The article was written:
"According to a later study, however, the trigger for her decanonization was a life of Saint Anna, written by Saint Ignatius of the Solovki, one of the notorious leaders of the Raskol who preached self-immolations."
This is incorrect. Ignatius has no relation to the Life of Anna of Kashin. Here you can read about who wrote the life of Anna of Kashin:  I cleaned this phrase and change the text.Wlbw68 (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Доброго здоровья коллега Константин (Kmorozov), посмотрел, статья написана Вами. Мы с вами пересекались в русской Википедии. Посмотрите пожалуйств на внесенные мною изменения в данную статью, в статье про Московский собор 1678 года:   я привёл ссылки, Вы можете их проверить, после чего  я готов с вами обсудить изменения. С уважением Wlbw68 (talk) 22:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Decanonization
Talk:Tom's Rhinoplasty

message: where be the trivia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KariaRockz (talk • contribs) 05:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Does this article pass the notability test? Alastairward (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesnt. Merge per WP:V: "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found featuring significant coverage of a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Change opinion on this article - Tom's Rhinoplasty appears to have been subject of a number of scholarly reviews on LGBT studies, although I cannot access the pieces themselves. -- The Red Pen of Doom 05:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See This page to discuss about the merger. --Gman124 talk 16:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Appears", but unless we know that these multiple studies do more than "passingly mention" the episode, we cannot know for sure.   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 06:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Jean-Jacques Barthélemy

message: The article reads: "Choiseul had a great regard for Barthélemy, and on his return to France, Barthélemy became an inmate of his house, and received valuable preferments from his patron."
Surely "inmate" (which means "prisoner") is incorrect. 
"Guest" is probably the best term; but I leave the editing to someone familiar with the subject matter.
Karl gregory jones (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inmate not the correct term
Talk:Indonesia national football team

message: There seems to be some vandalism at the Rivalries section with Malaysia 182.0.249.120 (talk) 02:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malaysia H2H record 

message: Indonesianguy1945 (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 23:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2024
Talk:Georg Zoëga

message: Wrong link to Daler it should be to a location - se the danish artikel :da:Daler Sogn --80.197.249.4 (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've merged George Zoëga into this article; a merge tag had been sitting at the top of the article for more than six months. I merged that article to this page simply because this one was much more substantial. I don't know or care what the article on him should be titled, but I just wanted to get it done, so as not to have two articles on the same man. For what it's worth, histories of Egyptology always seem to call him "Georg Zoëga", usually, I think, with the diaeresis in his surname. A. Parrot (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The name for the article should not be jörgen. This page should be moved to jørgen zoëga, and a redirect link made.  Schwiiz (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: From a quick search it looks like the most common variant of his name is Georg Zoëga, which is also the title of the article in Danish (:da:Georg Zoëga). I've moved this page accordingly. I'm not sure how to cover the various spellings of his name in the text itself, though. – Joe (talk) 20:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name.
Talk:Straw man (law)

message: This content comes from the original "Straw Man" article, which has now been disambiguated into several articles. For a full history up until March 6, 2006, see Straw man. -- MisterHand 03:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating "Straw Man" 

message: I realize this article lacks citations -- note that it's already been flagged for this. I did not create the article (I simply edited it), but would appreciate help in adding citations rather than wholesale deletion of the article, as it has been a part of Wikipedia's series of articles on property law for over a decade. 
Also, please note Wikipedia's own guidelines on edits made in good faith and the potential harm of reverting and edit wars. Hagaland (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , do not re-add uncited material without proper citations. Uncited material, as per WP policy, may be removed at any point. And may not be re-added without a valid ref from an independent, reliable source. Onel5969 TT me 20:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add citations rather than deleting page 

message: Please note that I am not the author of any content of this page outside of a few minor edits. (feel free to verify this under page history)  
This article has been existence in one form or another since 2006, but I have no horse in this game outside of seeing how Wikipedia's own guidelines for conduct and procedure are given due process by other editors. Again, I have contributed no original research to this article. If you feel that someone has contributed original research, that should be talked about with that editor in question. I do want to point out that a lack of citations does not mean that the content is unverifiable. Quoting from Wikipedia:No_original_research: "The prohibition against OR means that all material added to articles must be attributable to a reliable, published source, even if not actually attributed." 
Please also see Wikipedia:List_of_policies#Deletions for guidance on how to handle content that is considered objectionable. Hagaland (talk) 21:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , learn WP:VERIFY. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

text: , your reference has nothing to do with what we're talking about.  Apparently you need a refresher course in verifiability.  Here's the key sentence, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable.". You should also familiarize yourself with WP:BURDEN. Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't shoot the messager
Talk:Jean Beetz

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 21:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I'm not sure how to incorporate it into the text but it would be good to point out that his name isn't pronounced "B-ee-ts" (rhymes "meats"), rather it's "B-e-ts" (rhymes with "jets").-PullUpYourSocks 03:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Template talk:Harvard University

message: If templates can't use fair-use images, then I suppose this template should have no image at all, as Harvard's logo, whether it was traced in Illustrator from photographs, or whether it was rasterized from a business card pdf, is nonetheless Harvard's trademark, but I think that the image is certainly still fair use, within the template.  Many versions of the Veritas shield can be seen around campus, but ones similar to the I'm leaving on this page are most common. --jacobolus (t) 03:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which shield to use

message: Does anyone else feel this template takes up too much space on the screen? Is there a better way we could organise the information? There are also a number of boxes with no titles. Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too large?
Talk:Straw man (dummy)

message: This content comes from the original "Straw Man" article, which has now been disambiguated into several articles. For a full history up until March 6, 2006, see Straw man. -- MisterHand 03:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguating "Straw Man" 

message: :-) Love it! CapnZapp (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...and are usually far more effective than the straw man." 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support move to Straw man (dummy) or Straw man (mannequin). Current page title made me smirk though. --erachima talk 10:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Eager evaluation

message: I rewrote the article to address the concerns below and provide a neutral point of view. I attempted to limit the article to common, general facts and avoid trying to prove points in the article. 71.225.188.211 (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Rewrite

message: I recommend either a merge or a move from the other article to here. Skl (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Apart from anything else (and there's plenty wrong), it conflates eager and strict evaluation. Itsbruce (talk) 22:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged from here to the evaluation strategy article. There isn't a lot to say about eager evaluation on its own, all the article are like "here's our new alternative XYZ to eager evaluation". Really it only exists as the opposite of lazy evaluation. --Mathnerd314159 (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is both poorer and shorter than the corresponding section in [Evaluation Strategy]
Talk:Number One Dime

message: In that story Scrooge discovers the first coin ever minted by Croesus, who is said to have been richer than Scrooge. He gives the coin to Magica, who creates an amulet from it. An amulet created with first coin of the richest man ever is said to give Magica the powers of Midas. The amulet made of Croesus's coin does not give her that power, so it's proven that Scrooge was richer than Croesus.
:No it doesn't - in fact it proves nothing. This idea is based on the assumption Scrooge is the richest man ever, which he may not be. Scrooge could just as well be poorer than Croesus for the amulet to not have power. --90.240.34.177 03:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richest 

message: Given that the wiki contains a screencap from Ducktales, shouldn't there be some mention of the two-part episode (I forget the title) that recounted the origin of the coin?84.64.130.93 (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ducktales
Talk:Michael Andre

message: Not entirely convinced of notability here...but not sufficiently unconvinced to launch an AFD either. I would note, however, that Wikipedia has a very explicit policy against writing an article about yourself, so I'd encourage User:MAndreOX to please respect Wikipedia policy on neutrality and writing style. Bearcat 03:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: I don't question notability, but do think that the article is in need of a clean-up by someone with knowledge of the subject. WP:MOS and WP:BIO will likely be of help. Victoriagirl 16:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up request
Talk:Frankenhooker

message: I think the price of budget ($2,500,000)is not right, I'm not sure, but it could be wrong.
It is a low budget movie.
joe.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.234.26.105 (talk) 21:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: Frankenhooker was never broadcast on basic cable, and certainly was not televised in the year before it was even completed. It was a ridiculous struggle just getting it into theaters because the MPAA refused to grant an R rating because of the mix of crack, whores, and comedy. What idiot claims it was broadcast on Night Flight before theatrical release? Ridiculous!!!     Bustter (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: never on Night Flight
Talk:Abbas Almohri

message: I have given the title capital letters —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameswilson (talk • contribs)  
Thank you for your help.
Why the article is not reliable?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Logicism (talk • contribs) 
:Greetings. It looks like a good article, we just need some sources for the info. --Bradeos Graphon 19:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Environmental issues in Ethiopia

message: Someone attempted to edit this article several years ago, but this edit mangled the article's text, apparently by accident. Surprisingly, this error has not yet been corrected. Jarble (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something's wrong here 
Talk:Jack Keller (artist)

message: It is not possible to die in January of 2003 and then attend an event. 76.24.239.68 (talk)
:Fixed. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  death AND attending a Comic Con in same year 
Talk:Soil conservation

message: large field can be divided into small fields sleep of dresses are left to grow between the crops break up the force of the wind this method is called strip cropping 59.91.81.148 (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strip cropping 

message: methods of soil conservation 2409:4070:4015:BB70:5C01:72C6:4A7B:788D (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Environmental issues in Iran

message: Why isnt there an environmental section in the main Iran article?  Sounds like a POV fork issue. Socialbutterfly31 07:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not something in main article
Talk:Bingham plastic

message: Friction factor expression presented for turbulent-flow regime results unacceptable values.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gornya (talk • contribs) 05:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

message: It might be just me but i dont think that it is nessacary to have two identical graphs with only the X-Y axes reversed. This seems to only cloud the important information. I don't feel strongly enough about this to take it down but if more people agree with me then we might.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcusyoder (talk • contribs) 19:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not the same axes. Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it nessacary to have two figures for the same information? 

message: The citation that is given is for the original Buckingham equation, which has a dramatically different form.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.73.64.152 (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dimensionless form or the Buckingham-Reiner equation does not have an appropriate citation 

message: There's a formula for laminar flow (fL), and another for turbulent flow (fT). Whereas fT is defined, the reader has to infer that fL is for laminar flow, because it's not defined - although the first bullet is "f is the laminar flow Darcy friction factor (SI units: dimensionless)" ... but f is actually the Darcy friction factor from the first equation! I think the L is missing from the definition of fL, so I've added it. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 22:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friction factor formulae
Talk:Dun (fortification)

message: I'm doing some disambiguation work and creating a dab page at Dunum. The page now at Dunum, Lower Saxony, previously at the base name, had a hatnote which included: "For the type of Celtic fort, see dun.", but I can't see any mention of the word on this page to justify that link, or an entry on the new dab page. I'm not including it in the new dab page, but if it should be there, please add something to this article to mention "dunum" and then add it to the dab page. PamD 08:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunum 

message: "The Proto-Celtic form is *Dūno-, yielding Gaulish δου̃νον"
1) the reference to "Ptolemy" after that last one is most probably false, the true one being (again, probably) Ps.-Plutarch. De fluviis 6.4.10
2) "Gaulish δου̃νον" (and the example forms quoted below): the only thing "Gaulish" in this form is the root "duno-", but we do not know the ending: Greek authors customarily added Greek endings to foreign words, just like Roman authors added Latin endings to foreign words. As a consequence, e.g. Lyon is recorded as "Λούγδουνον" in Greek sources, and as "Lugdunum" in Latin sources, and neither form records the original "Gaulish" ending. So I would not be so quick in proclaiming -δου̃νον Gaulish, as it is probably a Gaulish as the corresponding Latin form on -dunum.
3) I also do not quite get why to write it in Greek letters. Greek authors obviously write it using the Greek alphabet, because they are Greeks...
4) "London" is called "Londinium" or "Londunium" in Latin, so given that there is a byform "din" to the "dun", it seems pretty obvious that the root in question is also there. -87.205.198.18 (talk) 21:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ptolemy 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2024
Talk:Za Ginipiggu

message: It can be found here
: Thanks.  I've redirected Za Ginipiggu to that page.  (Za Ginipiggu did not, however, meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion.  It had been listed for speedy deletion, but should have just been redirected.) --Idont Havaname (Talk) 05:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's already an article about the Guinea Pig series
Talk:Nick Cardy

message: The fair use of :image:BatLash1.jpg in this article is questionable. Listed below is/are the reason(s) for this:
Currently this is one of three comic book covers being used to illustrate Nick Cardy's style. Due to the length of the article, this seems excessive.
This image in particular is also not included in the body of the text, but in the "References" section. The makes it appear to be the most "decorative" of the three.
If the above concern(s) can be addressed in light of the relevant policies and/or guidelines, the image use can be retained. If not, the image needs to be removed from the article.
- J Greb (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed image as per the above. - J Greb (talk) 01:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free image use 
Talk:E-Bullion

message: I have added a citation request for the bullion stored. I cannot find it on their website. nirvana2013 17:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe e-Bullion stopped disclosing their figures in May 2005 or so. I have deleted the text. nirvana2013 17:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullion stored 

message: plaese american government should do all their best to re open ebullion bcos i am having 4,400 dollars in my account and that is my life savings for the sake of yahoo not to re happen again bco this time would be worst than ever plaese u poeple should resolve your issue and let me have my hard earned money please i say agin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.166.237.254 (talk) 18:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  i  will be bankrupt 

message: Is there any more recent info on the court cases?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.95.70.128 (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  outdated 
Talk:Environmental issues in Pakistan

message: How has Obamification contributed to deforestation? Has Obamablight affected the area yet? The George Bush Highway in Ghana was paved Double Wide. Will Obamification put up a Parking lot as well?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.58.117 (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obamification 

message: This article lacks citations and reliable sources. There are several paragraphs that have been written without citations. Several paragraphs have also been plagiarised from websites like http://countr'ystudies.us/pakistan/26.htm and https://www.gope'tition.com/petitions/stop-violations-of-environmental-laws-in-pakistan.html, which are on wikipedia's blacklist. Therefore i had to alter the links because it wasn't allowing me to post them . The content has been copy pasted from different site. Also the information used from the source https://www.g'opetition.com/petitions/stop-violations-of-environmental-laws-in-pakistan.html maybe biased as it is from a petition. A neutral source should be used instead. There are also several grammatical errors too. Hasnathashwani (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism and copy right
Talk:John S. Hall

message: this article needs some serious attention, i think. ._-zro—Preceding undated comment added 04:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, someone please write more!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.204.87 (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 