lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dundee West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article lists McGovern as the Labour candidate. We need a reliable ext ref that McGovern has actually been officially selected to defend this seat.
AFAIAA he has not actually been selected. If a ref is not provided today then his name must be removed from the list of "Confirmed candidates". --Mais oui! (talk) 09:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Jim McGovern the Labour Party candidate for the next general election? 

message: I have removed the following text from the "Politics and history of the constituency" section of this article: "Its voters have traditionally been more loyal to the Labour Party than the neighbouring Dundee East constituency; which had elected only one Labour MP since the 1950s." This patently untrue. Since the 1950s Dundee East has been represented by 4 different Labour MPs and SNP MPs. It never elected a non-Labour MP until 1974 and again was represented by Labour members from 1987 until 2005. The majority of elections in this period were won by Labour candidates. Indeed until the 1970s Dundee East was arguably the safer Labour seat, with the 1973 Dundee East by-election, being the first close result (whereas Dundee West came close to being gained by the Conservatives in 1959). Admittedly on the current boundaries - which give Dundee East significant chunks of Angus as well as parts of  - Dundee it may well have returned non-Labour candidates prior to 1974, we are not dealing with hypotheticals here and the statement was factually untrue. Dunarc (talk) 23:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate text removed
Talk:East Lothian (UK Parliament constituency)

message: "Labour rebels in Iain Gray's Scottish parliamentary constituency are threatening to field an independent candidate against the local MP at the next general election, in a move which would leave the Scottish leader's power base in chaos." - http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2471817.0.rebel_candidate_threatens_to_split_vote_in_labour_leaders_patch.php
Worthy of a mention? Perhaps best to wait until it actually happens?--Mais oui! (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour rebels to field Ind candidate?
Talk:The Ritz (TV series)

message: Has this been released on DVD? Roderick Spode (talk) 11:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

message: Trying to buy this bbc comedy 1987 88.108.63.103 (talk) 01:36, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putting on the ritz 1987 comedy
Talk:Johann Wild

message: * Rolf Decot: Der Einfluß der Reformation auf die Predigt im Mainzer Dom von Capito bis Wild, in: Irene Dingel and Wolf-Friedrich Schäufele (eds.): Zwischen Konflikt und Kooperation. Religiöse Gemeinschaften in Stadt und Erzstift Mainz in Spätmittelalter und Neuzeit. Mainz 2006 (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Europäische Geschichte, Mainz, Beiheft 70) , pp. 87–102.
--HHill (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newer source
Talk:How Do You Want Me?

message: The article and categories suggest that this was a sitcom, but as noted it appeared in a'Top 50 TV Dramas of All Time' list in the Guardian (which referred to it as a 'dramedy'). Would it not be better classed a comedy drama? Dunarc (talk) 18:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sitcom?
Talk:The Liver Birds

message: In the first paragraph it says 'they desperately trawled parties.'  Did they ? I've not seen all the episodes but I can't remember a single episode when they desperately trawled a party, or were even at a party.Sayerslle (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Party girls?

message: The order of the episodes is wrong and I want to try and get it right - when I'm sure of the order I'll change it . I know from back issues of Radio Times that episode 2  first shown Thursday 14 January 1971 is at the moment placed as the fourth episode, and the fourth episode, 28 January 1971 is listed as seventh episode at the moment. I think its better to change it all in one go though, rather than fiddle when I'm not sure of the entire correct order and it's not a big deal but it should be in the right order ideally. The DVD  of series two put the episodes in a different order to the broadcast order so I blame the DVD. Sayerslle (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Second series, order of episodes

message: Although I'm aware of the continuity nightmare that is series 10, I notice episode 2 of that series is called Mrs Boswell Comes to Call - and yet I'm pretty certain there is no Mrs Boswell in that series - or rather, the character that used to be Mrs Boswell is now Mrs Hennessey, due to being Beryl's mother instead of Carol's. So either the episode title is wrong... or alternatively it's correct, and it proves that the programme makers were just as confused by the shameless retconning as everyone else. Mark and inwardly digest (talk) 11:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996 episode title
Talk:Seven of One

message: The article title is "Seven of One", but the programme name is also given as "7 of One" at some places in the article. Furthermore, the IMDb page linked to gives the title as "7 of 1". Which title is correct? — 194.74.1.82 (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct title? 
Talk:Class invariant

message: :An object invariant, or representation invariant, is a programming construct consisting of a set of invariant properties that remain uncompromised regardless of the state of the object. This ensures that the object will always meet predefined conditions, and that methods may, therefore, always reference the object without the risk of making inaccurate presumptions.
This paragraph comes from the article Object invariant before merging it to this article. Object invariant, as defined in this paragraph, doesn't seem to have a different meaning from class invariant. If this is the case, I suggest removing this paragraph completely - or is there something that makes is reasonable to distinguish between class invariant and object invariant? --Abdull (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad merge? 

message: Given the native and almost complete implementation of design by contract in D programming language, I find it hard to believe this page doesn't give a bit more evidence to D, its syntax and ideas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.21.6.82 (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  D language 

message: Currently the article claims "that even though descendant classes may have access to the implementation data of the their parents, the class invariant can prevent them from manipulating those data in any way that produces an invalid instance at runtime." Class invariants prevent corruption about as well as laws prevent crime, i.e., not at all -- unless they are respected.  It would be more accurate to say that if the descendant classes all respect the class invariant, then descendant classes don't break invariants; however this is really just like saying that, if everyone obeyed the law, there would be no crime; it's essentially meaningless.
I think the article needs to be clearer about the various levels of enforcement: none, dynamic checks, static checks. Only the last actually prevents corruption.
Also it might be good were the article to explain the relationship between class invariants and and abstraction relations. Theodore.norvell (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevent?
Talk:Crookstown, County Cork

message: Although the address given in the Garda directory is Crookstown, the station is actually in the village of Farnanes, some three kilometres away.Scartboy (talk) 11:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. I've updated slightly to qualify. Let me know if you think further qualification is required. Otherwise other things associated with the village (incl Crookstown Railway Station, Crookstown Castle, Castlemore Castle, Crookstown United, etc) are also not within the village centre proper. Granted, the Garda station is probably the most distant such example... Guliolopez (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the Garda station
Talk:Castlemartyr

message: Imokilly is repeatedly referred to in this article but it is not defined.  From the context, it is clearly an area, but is not clear if it is an older name for the area now known as Castlemartyr, or a larger area or what.  I arrived at this article via a search for "Seneschal of Imokilly" which is in the Second Desmond Rebellion article with a redlink for Imokilly that I would like to cure.  Can anyone help?--Rye1967 (talk) 20:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imokilly 
Talk:Life with the Lyons

message: Could it be added to this article that this sitcom made it to a poll to find Britain's favourite sitcom? I think it was ninety-seven out of one hundred. Vorbee (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Britain's Best Sitcom
Talk:Mrs Merton and Malcolm

message: Thank you to any and all for writing this up. "MMAM" is one of my all-time favourite comedy shows, and it's a terrible shame it was so mis-understood by those in the business of being so-called "TV Critics" who should apparently know better.
Looking forward to the 10/11/08 for the DVD release, all being well.
James (UK) (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:François de Tournon

message: A lot of this article seems to be focused less on Tournon, and more on the electoral politics of the Papacy which particularly for the 1555 Conclave section are almost entirely irrelevant to Tournon outside the final sentence. While certainly valuable if perhaps somewhat POV material it does not feel like it belongs in this biography article.
Sovietblobfish (talk) 22:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Focus
Talk:Ballinhassig

message: Go Ballinhassig!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.76.231.10 (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ballintemple

message: We doing some research and find these two different references: Ballintemple, ARM, IRL (dated back in the late 1700's / early 1800's) and Ballintemple, Arklow, Wicklow, Ireland (current in Wikipedia). I thought ARM referred to County? Armagh. Can anyone shed some light on this location identification? Thank you kindly. JimScott (talk) 01:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  genealogical references 
Talk:Edinburgh East (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I reverted an edit by a user who has been making a largely erroneous series of MOS edits. For a change, this one was from one valid MOS:DATERANGE format to another, rather than the introduction of an outrigh error but still, these shouldn't be tinkered with on the basis of personal preference alone. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS:DATERANGE
Talk:Edinburgh South West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Would it be worth adding a note that Alistair Darling was the sitting MP for Edinburgh Central when he stood for and won Edinburgh South West at its first election in 2005? Dunarc (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005
Talk:Glasgow East (UK Parliament constituency)

message: David Marshall is retiring due to ill health, thus there will soon be a by-election in this seat, and he will no longer be the Labour candidate at the next general election.86.157.44.153 (talk) 22:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glasgow North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I don't know how the original contributor did it, and I don't know how to correct it, but the map position is way wrong -- about 60 miles too far south; it's shown in Dumfriesshire or south Ayrshire!
Wyresider (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map (very) wrong 
Talk:Glasgow North East (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I'm an SNP supporter, but I wanted this to be as NPOV as possible. Would some interested party correct any mistakes I've made? I'm still adding citations. Ollie Garkey (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think most of what you added should go on the Glasgow North East by-election, 2009 article. This article is to cover the constituency in general and not any single election. It would probably be useful to have a brief 2 to 3 paragraph section summarising the election with a  link to the by-election article. Road Wizard (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Check me on this, guys. 

message: The section on the 2009 election reads like an essay, which is not referenced, not an encyclopaedic article. Phrases include "No less than", "There was concern that", "there was much talk that", "Frustrated by their loss". In addition there are also POV statement that Bain was an opposition candidate despite being Labour. Martin451 (talk) 21:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issues
Talk:Glasgow South (UK Parliament constituency)

message: the TUSC candidate is not listed on ukpollingreport but is listed on a TUSC pdf. 
anyone know which is correct?Oxr033 (talk) 12:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TUSC candidate 
Talk:Estonian Americans

message: Some potential Estonian Americans to write about 
# Alar Kivilo - cinematographer
# Toivo U. Raun, Ph.D -Historian the author of Estonia and the Estonians 
# Mare Taagepera Ph.D - Legendary Organic Chemistry Professor, University of California, Irvine; wife of Rein Taagepera — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bulldog123 (talk • contribs) 10 September 2008 (UTC)
: corresponding correct links are Alar Kivilo, Toivo Ülo Raun and Mare Taagepera--Estopedist1 (talk) 13:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this edit accurate? Badagnani (talk) 04:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was good-faith, but probably inaccurate. The IP presumably believed this unreverted edit from 2006, but I don't. This page gives 1,401 Estonians in Washington, but only 1,097 in Maryland and only 74 in Idaho as of the 2000 census. Pais (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncommented change by anon IP
Talk:Belgooly

message: Previously someone had added a derivation of Béal Guala as "mouth of coal". This was uncited (and probably unlikely). Now it reads "mouth of the ridge". While possibly more likely, this is also uncited. Unless a reliable and verifiable source for these derivations is provided, they shouldn't be here - as they fail WP:OR. (I would note that the Placenames Commission database lists scanned sources suggesting derivation from "pit" or "prison" - but again not definitive enough for inclusion). Guliolopez (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: As there hasn't been any comment/input on the above for several weeks (or several years in case of previous text), I've removed the uncited translation(s). If documented and reliable reference is provided, quite open to seeing appropriate copy returned. Guliolopez (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Area codes 904 and 324

message: The "Sprint History of Florida Area Codes" is WRONG for the creation of 904. 813 was indeed created by AT&T in 1953 for future DDD use to call southwestern Florida, but the northern and north-central parts of Florida was continued to be reached with 305 until 1965. Early 1960s phone books for Jacksonville to Pensacola indicate that their area code is still 305; phone books from all over show 305 for northern Florida in their area code and DDD pages in the early 1960s. Several newspapers in 1965 have articles which indicate that there will be a new 904 area code for northern and north-central Floria on July 11th of that year. Telephone directories didn't first show 904 for northern Florida in their DDD pages until 1965 and 1966; some directories published in Summer 1965 have references in their DDD/area code pages to begin using 904 instead of 305 on July 11th of 1965. 70.189.33.226 (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  905 split from 305 on Sunday July 11th, 1965 

message: The article for Area codes 305 and 786 indicates that there was a "permissive dialing period beginning July 6, 1965, and a mandatory dialing period beginning January 1, 1966". This conflicts with this articles statement that there was "no formal permissive dialing period".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomPessimist (talk • contribs) 17:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting Information about "flash-cut" 

message: I have resolved the two discrepancies noted in the above comments. Mgrē@sŏn 14:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 
Talk:Kanturk

message: Hello Fellow Wikipedians
I am inquiring about the addition of the Local Area profile on the Town of Kanturk which has been added to places like Mallow and Fermoy. Do you suggest I include this to Kanturk due to the fact this article lacks information relating to the town?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cork Live (talk • contribs) 00:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello LTA block evading sock. I suggest that, if you are interested in continuing to edit Wikipedia, that you move for an unblock of your original user. And that you otherwise stop creating new user profiles in an attempt to circumvent sanctions. Guliolopez (talk) 08:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanturk's Demographics and Local Area Profile
Talk:Technical intelligence

message: I came to this article after working on Farewell Dossier  Since the Farewell Dossier dealt, depending on your point of view, with TI or S&TI, I thought it wise to update Technical Intelligence, so there was cross-reference to KGB Directorate T and Line X. Before I really knew it, I was wandering from S&TI to economic intelligence, a line easy to cross.
As I look at this article, it really addresses three related areas of intelligence:
:*Tactical technical
:*National-level scientific and technical
:*National-level economic
Can this be made to work, in its present form, as one article, or does it needs to split into two or three articles> If two, national level S&TI would go with economic intelligence, although things like trade negotiations and macroeconomics are things that are economic but not S&TI. There doesn't seem to be any great way to split up the topics, as all of these "output" areas -- TI, S&TI, economic intelligence -- all have collection, analysis, and, especially when deciding what to share with industry, dissemination issues.
I have avoided even thinking about FININT, which certainly affects economic intel. 
Any thoughts are welcome.Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 03:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction of this article? 

message: I am trying to cleanup the text and format.  Eventually, this might be two articles, one on Technical Intelligence and one on Scientific and Technical Intelligence.   The terms are used interchangeably, so I await better referencing and cleanup to make a call on this.  I have put a redirect on Scientific and technical intelligence for now. 18:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Cantonment, Florida

message: Any veteran of the U.S. Army knows, and Webster's even testifies, can-tone-ment is the predominant, current AmEnglish pronunciation. If it changed over time, it wasn't something unique to Cantonment, FL. No linguist here, but my guess it is part of some common trend in AmEnglish. Caisson 06 (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Glenrothes (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Perhaps some comment is required on the Glenrothes page to highlight that there were 7,000 (SEVEN THOUSAND) postal votes received.
The Labour party were not expected to win this seat.
It wouldn't be the first time the Labour party had been vote rigging: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4408101.stm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.157.52.65 (talk) 11:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Moray (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Does anyone else think the content about Stuart MacLennan (former Labour candidate in 2010 who was removed for embarassing Tweets) doesn't belong here? It's pretty trivial, and I don't think it has any long-term significance. If no one else comments I'll remove it. Robofish (talk) 15:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Case of WP:RECENTISM which has now gone cold. Makes sense to delete doktorb wordsdeeds 07:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuart MacLennan
Talk:Ochil and South Perthshire (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I am a little confused by the boundary changes of 2005 as far as they relate to predecessor seats of the current constituency. The Boundaries section of the article states:
:Prior to the 2005 election, the council areas had been covered by the Angus, Ochil, Perth and North Tayside constituencies.
Which I would take to mean the current constituency had four predecessors; Angus, Ochil, Perth and North Tayside. However, 90.213.233.209 (talk · contribs) has made an edit stating that "Angus NOT Predecessor Seat" while retaining the reference to the Angus constituency in the Boundaries section. Can someone more familiar with the area please confirm whether the four named constituencies were the predecessors to the current one? Road Wizard (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This constituency only has three predecessor seats: Perth, Ochil and North Tayside. This constituency is wholly within the Clackmannanshire and Perth & Kinross local authority areas whereas the old Angus constituency was located in the Angus local authority area, which is not covered by this constituency. Brythones (talk) 13:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessor seats
Talk:Narangba, Queensland

message: This page, along with others, has been edited with a lot of information removed. It now focusses on education. Where is the information, history and photos? All we can read about is when the schools were built. What about pioneers, shops, services, etc? Whoever has taken this upon themselves to remove important information has no right. 58.104.192.72 (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the real History?
Talk:Goleen

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.facebook.com/skibbheritagecentre/posts/michael-harrington-left-goleen-during-the-famine-and-went-on-to-be-imprisoned-in/1076466082371279/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AFBorchert (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dragon Rage

message: "In most Might and Magic titles dragons are characterised as a menace and threat (with an evil alignment)" - I don't think that's entirely correct, while sometimes they are shown as evil (for most of the promotion quests in MM6 and MM7 etc.), but quite often they are shown as neutral, for example, in MM8 where the player has a choice between killing dragons or dragon hunters, or in Heroes Chronicles, where both good and evil dragons are shown. --GreatEmerald (talk) 07:02, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon alignment