lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John I of France

message: The discussion on Salic Law, I suggest, should go. Moreover, they later had Joan renounce, they certainly did not consider Salic law as important as her batardise Snapdragonfly 01:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  old comments 

message: The image ought to be removed. It is an image of an adult created centuries after the death of this infant king. It has no realism and its similarity to other portraits in the same series gives lie to its lack of any unique value in terms of information about John I or people's perceptions of him. Srnec 04:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Shouldn't the discussion of the succession to John I logically be moved to the article on his successor, Philip V?  The issue had no impact on John since he was dead.Aldrichio 20:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Short answer: padding. Longer answer - it is worth summarising what happened in this article, since it was his death that threw the succession into doubt. Michael  Sanders 21:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of Succession

message: John I (15 November 1316 – 20 November 1316), called the Posthumous, was King of France and Navarre, and Count of Champagne, as the son and successor of Louis X, for the five days he lived. He thus had the shortest official reign of any French king.
Louis XIX reigned for half an hour, "officially," depending on how you look at it.  It's unclear whether he or his nephew should be considered to have reigned in the period between Charles X's abdication and Louis Philippe's taking the throne, but the claim seems reasonable enough as to make this sentence problematic. john k (talk) 01:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlike John I, Louis (a duke) isn't universally recognized as 'King of France' by historians. Therefore, John's is the shortest reign. GoodDay (talk) 19:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortest reign? 

message: ,  I noticed that change by  a few weeks back and poked around a bit, and it seemed to be correct. Also noted that both fr.wp and de.wp give the 19th. In case it helps, here is some info from what Tintero put in the ref for the change, abridged by me:
*(Eric's quotes because Eric is somewhat confused by how the note is written and sourced). Eric talk 18:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I just noticed the death date was changed, after it being the 20th, for so many years. GoodDay (talk) 18:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

text: I somehow ended up messing up the link for the Chronique parisienne, but that has been already fixed. Sorry! Tintero21 (talk) 21:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date
Talk:Wolfenbüttel

message: I have deleted the following two sentences, which appeared in different paragraphs, from the article:
:During World War II the town was the site of a concentation camp which was liberated by the 36th Tank Batallion of the 8th Armored Division.  
:During World War II it was the location of a concentration camp which was liberated by the 36th Tank Batallion of the 8th  Armored Division, USA.
This information is incorrect. I think the writer of the foregoing might be confusing Wolfenbüttel with Wolfsburg, which is not far away, albeit to the north-east of Braunschweig, and which--as home of automotive, weapons, and munitions plants--was the site of a labor camp called Arbeitsdorf. Jim_Lockhart 01:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is idiotic because Wolfenbüttel was in the British, not in the US occupation zone.
The discussion is idiotic? Read carefully and you notice that the whole point of my comments is that the idea that Wolfebüttel was the site of a labor camp is wrong; that said, the Americas did liberate some areas that were later in the British Zone; so the notion that Wolfebüttel's being in the British Zone negates any possibility that the Americans were the first into the area, is, shall we say... uninformed. Jim_Lockhart 05:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Concentration camp in Wolfenbüttel

message: The most important historical sight is the gorgeous church of St. Mary, where not only all the dukes, but also the composer Michael Praetorius are buried.--dunnhaupt 13:49, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sights
Talk:Everything in Transit

message: For each person who contributed to the album, should I include what tracks they worked on, just like what I've done for Andrew McMahon? -Jordan S 01:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I converted the personnel section according to the guidelines of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Albums. HarryCane 13:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the line "The album was received well and people of all ages enjoyed." since it is uncited and clearly POV.  If someone would like to add some sources on its reception (ie find reviews etc), they could add information about that, but not as this sentence stands. Crito2161 (talk) 19:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV on reception 
Talk:Petrocaribe

message: Please add any information you know about Petrocaribe to this page, or if you have links to articles about Petrocaribe please add them to the discussion page and I will attempt to sort through them for new information.  --MateoP 01:50, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Content needed

message: The Spanish article has substantial differences in its about this topic: :es:Petróleos de Venezuela#Acuerdo de Caracas (Petrocaribe). 84.59.74.58 02:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish version

message: *Haiti signs up to PetroCaribe oil-supply pact -- (Thursday, April 20, 2006)
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti (AP) - Haiti will soon join a Venezuelan oil pact that supplies Caribbean countries with fuel under preferential terms, President-elect Rene Preval said. CaribDigita 23:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haiti signs up to PetroCaribe oil-supply pact 
Talk:Prattville High School

message: This article has a "current events" feel to its athletic section. I think it should be shortened, or at least modified to represent Prattville High's athletic history, not its shortlived and very recent rise to fame.Rangikusboy (talk) 06:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Point of Order
Talk:DAA (Irish company)

message: http://www.daa.ie/gns/media-centre/press-releases/11-06-16/DAA_Finance_Plc_Statement.aspx
David Dilger is no longer with the DAA or on the board. Bill Cullen is currently acting Chairman.
22:56 10/11/2011 ROK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROK123 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dilger no longer with DAA 

message: I would like to discuss this issue with whoever is responsible for procurement of food products in Dublin and indeed all airports under the DAA company.  
I would be grateful for a responsebelow 86.187.226.131 (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gluten free food in Dublin Airport
Talk:Chinaberry

message: Melia azedarach is also a native of Australia. Peter1968 02:11, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: this might just be a synonym of Neem Shyamal 06:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Another binomial spelling is Melia azadirach, but I cannot find a source to check the correctness. Shyamal 06:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IPNI says M. azedarach es the right form. Others may be misspellings. Taragüí @ 17:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Where can I find up to date information regarding the toxicity of the North American Chinaberry?
:In this same article. Taragüí @ 17:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Toxicity
Talk:Electoral Reform Society

message: The phrase, "pressure group", may not be NPOV even in UK political parlance (can't quite remember), and definitely not in US political parlance. Could someone advise.  68.173.42.177 02:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Phrase seems fine to me in UK parlance. Mendor 16:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressure Group 

message: "The Society has three closely related organisations" - but it only lists two. Is the number wrong or is there an organisation missing? 5.81.52.144 (talk) 12:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the third?
Talk:Ali bin Hussein, King of Hejaz

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV  (Talk) 08:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:General Nguyen Ngoc Loan executing a Viet Cong prisoner in Saigon

message: On 25 Aug 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/General Nguyen Ngoc Loan executing a Viet Cong prisoner in Saigon for a record of the discussion.  That discussion ended with a recommendation that this article be considered for either merger or simple redirect to Nguyen Ngoc Loan.
:Picture is already in that article. WCFrancis 00:19, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Vela Uniform

message: My grandfather, Harold Carter Kohl, worked for Holmes and Narver and the AEC in the early 60's as an Atomic Engineer. I am looking for any information relating to his time with either organization and especially as related to Vela Uniform, his time in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Alaska, Nevada, or the Marshall Islands. I believe his specialty was designing detonation test sites. 
When I was a little girl, he gave me a radioactive piece of salt from one of the test sites, which I used to lick whenever I went to his house. My father used to have picnics with his mother, brother, and cousins about 10 miles from the blast sites so they could watch the bombs go off (one of my Grandpa Hi's big "fun" ideas!)... pretty interesting family history, as related to Project Vela. 
I'd love to talk to anyone who has information or who is currently searching for information related to the project.
Hannah Kohl - kohl.hannah@gmail.com
: You could go vist the SHOAL site, perhaps others.  SHOAL is about 30 miles west of Fallon, Nevada, and the area is unrestricted.  It's not terribly exciting though - there's no crater just a concrete pad and a bunch of groundwater monitoring wells.  Toiyabe 17:56, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Watch out on this aliases there.  Harold Clayton Urey was a well-known American physicist associated with the Manhattan project and other work. SkoreKeep (talk) 16:26, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Smiling, Proud Wanderer

message: Are the character names from the 3rd edition? Because some of the characters are wrong if the names are taken from the 2nd edition... For example, it's 劉正風 not 劉正峰﹐and 封不平 not 風不平。
(January 22, 2006) I've fixed the Chinese characters. ---LWC
:Not sure. Please leave messages at the end, and use section dividers. Thanks. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 23:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Full of flaws and sh**. Can't believe Mr. Jin yong wrote this story. No word on why the Dugu's nine sword has been learnt by the old master. But that's somewhat acceptable. He portraits Linghu Chong as a crybaby who keep beeging his master to allow him back, blindly not seeing his master's evil. He also knows Yi Lin loves him so much, and he ignores it outright! Mr. Jin yong also knows how much the beautiful nun loves him, and she's also the one knowing him best, and he kicks her out by creating  Ren Yingying, which make serious readers with a heart will so sorry for Yi Lin thruout the story. Usually, Mr. jin yong is very sensitive and delicate when it comes to love, but this time, he blows it all to hell! I have to say that apart from the unacceptable character design, the storyline is the best of jin yong's novels, but best + worst = bad! Hoefully someday Mr. Jin yong rewrites this story.
:The Old Master is an experienced, well-traveled character. So if Jin Yong wants to explain it, all he has to do is add one sentence like, "The old guy was visiting [insert a mountain] when he chanced upon Dugu's nine sword." So it's not a big deal.
:Linghu Chong's master raised him since he was a kid. It's the only family and home he has. Of course he loves and respect his master. Most people overlook the flaws of those close to them. Especially when the whole world refer to the guy as "The Gentleman Sword." His own wife, who shares a bed with him every night doesnt know he's a bad guy until the end. So it's not impossible that Linghu Chong doesnt know his master is evil. Heck, even the readers dont know until later in the novel.
:As far as his love life goes, it's not the first time females are overlooked by the protagonist in a Jin Yong novel. Lu Wushuang, Cheng Ying, Gongsun Lü'e, and Guo Xiang love Yang Guo but their loves were unreturned. Guo Fu realized that she has always has a crush on Yang Guo at the end of the novel, but she suppressed her feeling because she was then a married woman. In the In Sword Stained with Royal blood, the one-armed princess went off alone. When she made a cameo in The Duke of Mount Deer, it's mentioned that she still misses him. Princess Fragrance died in The Book and the Sword. Yin Li and Xiaozhao did not fare any better in Heaven Sword and Dragon Saber.
::- Elsonlam1 18 July 2008  —Preceding comment was added at 23:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jin yong's worst novel

message: I see citation needed added for afterward. Not sure what to add here. It's literally in the very book, almost verbatim Suredeath (talk) 03:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afterward
Talk:Lower gastrointestinal series

message: Hi!I really want to know about the considerations and precautions in Barium Enema for :
a)Patient with colon enlargement
b)patient with potential colon perforation
c)patient with Ostomies
and also details about Ostomies....
---------------
Hello, 
I am wondering why in the X-ray CT section on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_computed_tomography the dose for a Barium Enema is stated as 3 times higher then an Abdominal CT while in the Barium Enema section it is practically reversed and stated that the dose for an Abd. CT is higher then a Barium Enema.
Thanks,
09:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Renal colic

message: I question this assertion, as for acute sharp renal colic at least. Only urgent analgosedation provides better relief from acute severe renal colic, than does carefully titrated morphine together with an antispasmodic, in my experience.--84.163.114.46 (talk) 22:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As per my experience, NSAIDs such as ketorolac do provide very good pain relief from renal colic, at least for a limited amount of time. The NSAIDs cannot be consumed for long periods of time however. --IO Device (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal experience shows that the use of a morphine drip is set up due to the immense pain involved. Physicians need to remember, that failure to treat pain is against the law in several US states, and can lead to revocation of their license. If you are a physician, and will not prescribe adequate pain medication, then you need not be a physician.--Craxd (talk) 03:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diclofenac better than opioids? 

message: It is actually about renal stones, and not well written at that.  It may as well go or redirect, but for the fact kidney stones are just one cause of renal colic.
:I agree. This article sounds more like an article for kidney stones, and not the colic itself. Renal colic can have several causes.--Craxd (talk) 03:28, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs rewriting or deleting 

message: rationale?barebonearticl:(62.235.177.130 (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  alpha blockers 

message: 62.235.177.130 (talk) 14:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  syn=renalcrisis? 

message: How can one reduce the risk for recurrence Fedecimas (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevention
Talk:Sphenoid bone

message: I think this page needs a major reorganization.  Perhaps the topic of sphenoid bone is too big for one article, but I think a lot of the really small features that currently have their own articles can be merged with one of the larger articles.  Also, I think we should make it a point to mention every structure catalogued in the Terminologia Anatomica for this bone, maybe using a bold font.  Also, the Gray's format of surfaces is sort of tedious.  Mauvila 01:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it should be in summary format —Pengo 10:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization

message: Why is the sphenoid bone of importance to vision?
Spar252 23:37, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I replaced the old picture: 
With this picture: 
I find Gray's Anatomy pictures hard to look at and understand. If someone disagrees they can put the old one back. SadanYagci 00:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Seems the flexion of the spenoid is highly important to human evolution, at least according to some. e.g. the doco Homo Futurus (which is currently on the tele) goes on about it. Would be good to have some details here. —Pengo 10:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Human Evolution

message: Would his famous commentary on this bone's extraordinarily complex structure be an appropriate inclusion in this article?  (To a group of anatomy students:  "Gentlemen, this is the sphenoid bone.  Damn the sphenoid bone.") Cactus Wren (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oliver Wendell Holmes? 

message: I have proposed this merge, between the 'ossification' page and this article, because:
* There is no need for the information on ossification to be hidden away on a separate article. This means the information is not presented as it could be, and it is needlessly fragmented.
* It is standard on Anatomy pages, and recommended in WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy, for 'Development' sections to be displayed on the same page. 
* Additionally, this page is small and it would give more context to have the information displayed in a central location, rather than hidden on a separate article. 
* If necessary, the article on ossification could be expanded at a later date.
* As can be seen, by having two separate articles content is already duplicated and/or displayed on one or either article, rather than displayed in a central place on just one article LT910001 (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Ossification of sphenoid]]
Template talk:Infobox Dungeons & Dragons module

message: I made this DnD info box template to help standardize our growing collection of pages.   Incorporated good suggestes from several users, Waza & 
Frecklefoot, but we will see where this goes.  Wendell 04:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great!  I'm glad you took the initiative and got this going.  I'm glad you were able to incorporate some optional parameters as we discussed.  As for adding future items, if they're made optional, they won't break existing clients of the previous version of the template.  The only other comment I have is that I agree with Waza, the column label width should probably be a tad wider to prevent text wrapping. Great job! :D — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:31, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
Another idea for a proposed category: Contents. For many this would be ## page book & Cardboard cover. Though some modules (examples in brackets) had all sorts of extra's including additional card covers (I6, G1-2-3), fold out maps (H3, H4 }, cardboard counters (H1}, fold up models(H1, B6, AC3},  etc   User:Waza
Well I think that Module Contents should be discussed in the article text.  Too many variables and discussion to fit within an infobox.  Wendell 02:13, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experimental Testing Talk

message: I want to point out that all the linked modules in the infobox should be wikilinked to their articles, whether or not the articles exist yet.  That way, when they do exist, users can quickly jump to them.  Also, the broken links encourage users to write articles on them. For example, for the S3 article:
:|series = S1 S2 S3 S4
should be:
:|series = S1 S2 S3 S4
(I already fixed the article, I'm just using S3 as an example).  Any questions? — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:57, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
* Well, to carry the example further; all the modules should be wiki-linked.  For wiki-links in templates(only), the wiki-software will replace the link with a Bolded Entry.  In your example, as a template on the S3 article, the following wiki-code
* |series = S1 S2 [Expedition to the Barrier Peaks[S3]] S4
* would be rendered as 
* |series = S1 S2   S3  S4
* Wendell 01:53, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: While many uses of this template have followed the example above by Wendell, much of this is being removed by users editing to correct self links. While what Wendell suggests, self links to bold texts, works (and actually does work in non templates despite what is suggested) it does appear to be against the Wikipedia Manual of Style.  Therefore I would strongly recommend that Frecklefoot's original method of bolding the articles module code be used. Please change any self references seen to this and also please bold any module codes where self reference has been removed and the code not already enbolded. - Waza 00:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linked module wikilinking
Talk:Buhe

message: I'll try to find out for sure, but I think this is a harvest celebration, not necessarily a religious holiday. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:55, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Like Thanksgiving, Harvest festival and Mid-Autumn Festival/Chuseok, Ethiopian-style ? -- PFHLai 19:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1998–99 NHL season

message: Why is this in the "Memorable Moments in Sports" category? SFT 09:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You got me on this one. I have no idea. I guess it can be removed. Masterhatch 23:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorable? 

message: "The Eastern Conference was considered to be weaker, which would make it easier for the Leafs to make the playoffs, although the team also landed coach Pat Quinn and superstar goaltender Curtis Joseph which contributed to the Leafs' dramatic improvement."
I've removed the above-mentioned statement because it doesn't sound very NPOV (especially the first part), and there are no citations from secondary sources, etc. to back it up. Gujuguy 14:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed biased statement
Talk:1995–96 NHL season

message: I corrected the erroneous information in the opening paragraph regarding the Red Wings' 131 points being the highest point total in NHL history to say it was the second-highest. The highest point total in NHL history belongs to the dominant 1976-77 Montreal Canadiens, who edged the 95-96 Red Wings by a single point. I also added info about how this year's Western final was the starting point for the Avs-Wings rivalry. Thanks. Gujuguy 17:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Wings point total

message: Seeing as the Carolina Hurricanes have been mathematically eliminated from playoff contention, it's probably time to change this statement in the opening paragraph —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.216.186.123 (talk) 18:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Year Stanley Cup Champion Failed to Qualify for the Playoffs the Following Season

message: The Devils did not make the playoffs.  IT looks like the Stanley Cup Final series was that of 1995.  Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.57.98 (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finals 

message: There are standings from both the 1994-95 NHL season and the 1995-96 NHL season.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.250.103 (talk) 22:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standings 

message: The Avs were #2 this season, not #1. Not sure how the NHL standings templates work or I'd edit it ... Zlionsfan (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colorado conference rank 
Talk:2005–06 A1 Grand Prix season

message: These two section in all seasons teams table need to be checked. I've revised some racing teams but sources present only few informations. - Rollof1 13:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  racing teams and seatholder 