lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Party Sequence

message: I chaged the genre from Psychedelic rock to Progressive folk, like these sources say http://www.pinkfloydonline.com/discography/more/ and http://monkeybastardsv20.blogspot.com/2009/01/pink-floyd-lost-years_14.html
What the others of wikipedians think?
--Italodal (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a bad choice.  Furthermore, blogs are not reliable sources.  Instead of just quoting what bloggers think, you should be stating why you think the existing genre is wrong or inadequate. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 00:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

text: I prefer we use recognized genre names.  Some people have created articles for every combination of adjectives they can think of, but that doesn't mean there is any such recognized genre called "progressive folk", and we should avoid that term.  I think "rock" is flexible enough to include this track, so I'm in favour of the current genre. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Venetian Arsenal

message: It is not clear whether one ship was build a day, or a ship could be build in one day. The article implies both. I doubt it is physically possible to build a ship in one day, even with prefabrication, therefore what is meant must be the production capacity of the arsenal was one ship a day - i.e. 360 odd a year. Each ship would take, I would guess, several months to build.Royalcourtier (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  One ship a day? 
Talk:Main Theme

message: I am going to write this article in a few days.--Dr. Who 04:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Planned

message: In my opinion, this track predates several works produced by European artists along the 1970s, for example J.M. Jarre's Oxygene, or even much German stuff. Of course I am not going to put such pov in the article. I bet that some will come here and say: no, that wasn't a synth.--Dr. Who 02:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: most of 1970s electronic music in just one piece

message: I suggest add to the genre of this song the genre Avant-garde. This music as "Quicksilver" from the same album, has both elements of Avant-garde and Progressive rock. We have a conflict here, in the Soundtrack from the Film More article says : More contains some acoustic folk ballads, a genre that will appear sparsely on later works, a couple of hard rock songs ("The Nile Song", "Ibiza Bar"), and some instrumental tracks featuring their experimental (or avant-garde) approach and their trademark spacey/electronic sound (such as "Quicksilver" and "Main Theme"). But in the article of these song they are listed as Progressive rock. Other songs of the same genre, "Syncopated Pandemonium" and "The Grand Vizier's Garden Party, are listed as Avant-garde. I wainting the opinion of other wikipedians to change the genre.--Italodal (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can hear nothing in this track that suggests "avant garde" as a genre, and the article's mention of "experimental (or avant-garde) approach" is not the same thing as putting songs into that category exclusively.  The song has a basic melody, harmony, rhythm, etc., and is far too "ordinary" to be labelled avant garde.  About other examples, there is no article called "Syncopated Pandemonium", and "The Grand Vizier's Garden Party" has two genres, of which "avant garde" is questionable.  I'm not sure if this song's current genre, psychedelic rock is the best, though.  I think that originally, all tracks from this album were assinged that genre, and over the years others have "fiddled" with some songs' genres.  It's good to review them, but we shouldn't be changing every one of them arbitrarily, because they will just get changed again, just as arbitrarily, in future.  I'm going to counter-propose "progressive rock" for this song, as I think any psychedelic elements can be incorporated into "progressive" in this instance. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre Change 
Talk:Ibiza Bar

message: I got into the details of how this song is like/unlike "The Nile Song", and wound up specifying the chords of the chorus (A to C, G to B-flat, F, and back to A - all major), just to make the point that, while it doesn't cycle through six keys like "Nile", the chorus does quickly "modulate" (if that's the term) in and out of the key A major. If anyone sees fit to neatly trim these details out, I don't see myself putting them back in, as long as they're not replaced with errors. I'm not officially watching the article or anything.
I confess, I have no official or authoritative transcription of the song, and there will probably never be one for this rather unfortunate and forgettable tune, unless the project is a songbook of every tonal Pink Floyd piece ever. On the other hand, there's no doubt in my mind those are the chords, none at all. "The Nile Song" named keys and chords without a source for four years (until recently), so maybe, hopefully, we can let the facts on this one sit here quietly for awhile, not bothering anybody. Y'know, just kickin' back, bein' all true 'n' shit . . . .
--Ben Culture (talk) 05:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifying chords
Talk:W!LD RICE

message: This article reads like a glowing advertisement for W!LD RICE almost as if someone from their PR department wrote it.  Someone who knows more about this organization than I do needs to rewrite this article to be more objective.  Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Quicksilver (instrumental)

message: I suggest add to the genre of this song the genre Avant-gard. This music as "Main Theme" from the same album, has both elements of Avant-gard and Progressive rock. We have a conflict here, in the Soundtrack from the Film More article says : More contains some acoustic folk ballads, a genre that will appear sparsely on later works, a couple of hard rock songs ("The Nile Song", "Ibiza Bar"), and some instrumental tracks featuring their experimental (or avant-garde) approach and their trademark spacey/electronic sound (such as "Quicksilver" and "Main Theme"). But in the article of these song they are listed as Progressive rock. Other songs of the same genre, "Syncopated Pandemonium" and "The Grand Vizier's Garden Party, are listed as Avant-garde. I wainting the opinion of other wikipedians to change the genre.--Italodal (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've addressed points about other songs you mentioned on the page for "Main Theme".  For this song, while I agree it's strange music, I believe it was designed for its role in the film's soundtrack, and has no connection to abstract classical avant garde music.  As I've stated on another talk page, I think that when the song articles for this album were created, all were labelled "psychedelic rock" initially, and it's appropriate to review them now.  I would agree that progressive rock is more appropriate than psychedelic, and will propose this change. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre Change
Talk:A Spanish Piece

message: I suggest to change the genre of this music. This song lack of elements of rock, so it can't be classified as Progressive rock. It must be classified as Spanish folk music or Flamenco: See the Spanish guitar riff in this music it is the same of the Flamenco music. What do you guys think? --Italodal (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this track is inapproprately labelled, but surely this piece is satirical, and not a real attempt at Spanish music.  I really don't know how to classify it.  If it were longer, I might say it's a novelty song, but since it's such a short throw-away piece, I don't know if it needs a genre at all! --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre Change
Talk:Veredus Laboratories

message: the new brief section with mentioning smilar medical equipment companies was added, particuarly Nipro, NxStage, OrCam and https://vacuactivus.com/ - Vacuactivus  98Mondays (talk) 08:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  added section
Talk:Dramatic Theme

message: This music is Progressive rock with some elements of Psychedelic rock. We must change the genre to progressive rock. I waiting the opinion of the other wikipedians tho change it. --Italodal (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's just a reprise of Main Theme, it should have the same genre.  I proposed changing the genre of that song to progressive rock, so I agree with your proposal for this song, but only if there is agreement to change the other one to match. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre Change
Talk:Palazzo Labia

message: The intro to the article states that the facade on the Campo San Geramia was probably designed
by G. Massari, while the text states that it was designed by A. Tremignon.
68.164.171.86 (talk) 17:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Giudecca

message: The article says "the original Venetian Ghetto was in Cannaregio, in the north of the city, and there is no evidence, but for the name, of Jews ever having lived in Giudecca". However this source says "In 1252, Jews were not allowed to settle in the main part of the city, so they settled on the island of Spinaulunga (also spelled Spinalonga) which later became Giudecca." I don't want to get involved myself, I am not a historian and am not qualified to judge the reliability of various sources. But one source must be better than none. I hope a qualified historian will take a look at this. Maproom (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:I Am (Michael Tolcher album)

message: :Image:"I Am" album cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
βcommand 02:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:"I Am" album cover.jpg
Talk:Tsao Chieh

message: In the English article there is a notice and a link to the german translated wikipedia article. The source is coming from my article in de Netherlands wikipedia (Look at the first notice in the history of the german article: 22:00, 18. Aug. 2007 Forestguide (Diskussion | Beiträge) (5.373 Bytes) (Dieser Artikel ist eine Übersetzung des Artikels Chieh Tsao, Version vom 18. August 2007. Zusätzlich wurden weitere Begriffe in der deutschen Wikipedia verlinkt.). So it woud be better to translate the article from the Netherlands wikipedia. Greetings - Nlkalwien --84.63.168.190 (talk) 10:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trengganu Street

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Victor R Savage, Brenda S A Yeoh (2004), Toponymics - A Study of Singapore Street Names, Eastern University Press National Heritage Board (2006), Discover Singapore - Heritage Trails. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 00:28, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Magnetic detector

message: I think we need a photo of an old Maggie in the lead article and move the diagram to the  section on 'How it Works'.  John 05:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: I would like to see construction specification and operational notes added.   User: LDighera 20:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 

message: In my view the word «famous» has too many positive connotations for a great tragedy that was the sinking of the Titanic. I’m wondering … should it perhaps be changed to «infamous»? Gutten på Hemsen (talk) 17:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the sinking of the Titanic be considered «famous» or «infamous»?
Talk:Nembro

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians, I'm a student, so if I did something wrong that was not my intention, I am not an hacker or something like that. I'm contributing to this article by some translations from reliable sources in Italian. I'd like to underline that I have relaborated the sources for a question of copyright, while I'm going to verify also the already existing information. I am responsable only for my part and for the sources that i translated (Place of religious interest, into the nature, Covid pandemic, mayor's reassurance)I have also bought the book I mentioned.I am also adding a photograph, from the Wikimedia Commons repository, to motivate you better. I am part of the "Heritage and ICT" exam in the master's degree "Planning and Management of Tourism Systems" at the University of Bergamo and with this role i am contributing to the translation. Please find available the page of the university project: Wikipedia: GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage studies and ICT. If you have doubts, do not hesitate to contact me. Best, Alice Maj  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliuni1998 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  contribute
Talk:Barbette (performer)

message: According to a book I am editing (it is not published yet, so I don't feel comfortable quoting it), Barbette was very important in the circus world, directing acts. This seems to have been at least as important a part of his life as his drag work was. So, I suggest that the title of this article should be something like Barbette (performer and artist) or Barbette (drag and circus artist). --Pharillon 00:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I created the article and named it as I did simply to disambiguate it from Barbette. I have no objection to moving it to Barbette (performer). Otto4711 00:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Passing GA. All issues above are raised; 1 author does not make it unstable. giggy (:O) 06:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article
Talk:Carlotta (performer)

message: Should searching for just "Carlotta" lead to a disambiguation page? There are now three "You may have been looking for..." tags on this page. Is it time to disambiguate? -Lamarcus (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: , see Carlotta (disambiguation). WWGB (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Shoulder surgery

message: I SO wanted to place this on this page but I'm sure it violates certain wikipedia policies...
Trouble is, I haven't been able to find anything that contradicts her statements.  Sternoclavicular separation treatments appear to be very rare.
I personally know of another guy who's suffered a sternoclavicular separation.  He's a doctor, yet even he has never had it surgically treated.
I'm wanting to know and I think the world ought to know what these people are going through... and what options are available.  But I haven't been able to find out much other than from personal experiences. (However, this topic is not a primary concern for me at the moment).  I just wonder how to incorperate this information which is highly POV. Root4(one) 05:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sternoclavicular separation surgeries
Talk:Midnight breakfast

message: "Midnight breakfast" is a generic term, many US universities have it. I will rewrite the article with a generic student life focus. Wl219 05:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article was more resembling a blog with elements of directory listing, non3 of which encyclopaedic, see WP:Encyclopedia. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large chunks removed, not encyclopaedic
Talk:Pearl hunting

message: ... has been moved here.  
* The term 'pearl diving' is slang for 'washing the dishes'; as in "I've got to go pearl diving"  which means "I need to wash the dishes".
Perhaps this could go on a disambiguation page somewhere.   – Fred 02:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text from page 

message: Why was this changed from diving to hunting? I've only ever heard people refer to it as diving. "Pearl diving" is by far the more common term. Even if "pearl diving" is slang for something else, it seems strange to not use the most common term.
QuizzicalBee 19:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the problem is that there are more ways of looking or "hunting" for pearls than just by diving, such as gathering freshwater oysters from shallow water, but the article currently only describes the deepwater diving methods. 87.81.230.195 (talk) 15:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it make more sense to title the article Pearl collecting or Pearl gathering?  Hunting is a loaded term, as it not only suggests a search but also suggests that the prey is mobile - which clams definitely aren't!  The new title would remove this ambiguity. 81.156.125.126 (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: pearl hunting vs. pearl diving

message: * I can't believe no one thought to mention the 17th century Chinese author Song Yingxing. His treatise outlined a pretty important advancement for pearl divers in East Asia, that being a ship-rope attached securely to their waist while they had a breathing tube attached to their watertight leather face mask allowing them to breath underwater at large depths for long periods of time. Pretty important, surprised no one mentioned it, although Leonardo da Vinci wrote about divers using masks and breathing tubes about 2 and a half centuries before Song Yingxing.--PericlesofAthens 04:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd just written pretty much the same in a comment on that section - seeing it's not just me thining wonky, I'm now going to remove that section. Sean Heron (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=leHFqMQ9mw8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyond Price: Pearls and Pearl-Fishing - Origins to the Age of Discovery  By R. A. Donkin
Category talk:Art by country

message: What is the difference between this category and :Category:Arts by country.  The Arts page has a link to the Arts article, but the Art page does not have a link to what is meant by art.  Right now in the Colombian art category, there is a subcategory with writers, actors etc that I dont think belong there.  They belong in arts.  Just an example of the confusion by not having a definition.  --Scarykitty (talk) 05:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II

message: It's the first time I put comment on Wikipedia, so if I break some rules - please don't kill.
This article states, that Galerria is the World's odlest shopping mall - which is not true. Gallery in Brussels preceeds it by 30 years, both in design and contruction, which is also stated on Wikipage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galeries_Royales_Saint-Hubert
I don't want to mess around with Wiki pages myself, as a noobie, but I wanted to note it somewhere so someone more experiences maybe can take that into account.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szybcia (talk • contribs) 20:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the oldest

message: I feel the main image doesn’t do justice to the building or represent it clearly; it’s essentially an image focused on the ceiling. I’m hesitant to change photos myself, but I personally like the entrance photo a lot more. Otherwise, maybe we could find an interior photo that shows the shop fronts better (or perhaps have 2 main images to show both exterior & interior). I’ve never been to this place, so my opinion may not be well informed. Pythagimedes (talk) 22:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the main image? 

message: This is a shopping gallery because, unlike a mall, there are no doors or any special entrance associated with its four access points. Those are public streets between buildings - freely accessible to traffic. Stefantalpalaru (talk) 23:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shopping gallery, not shopping mall
Talk:Today (website)

message: This reads like a press release / marketing brochure, very subjective language.
Agreed -- sounds like marketing copy. SamClayton 19:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given the user name of the editor who has twice removed a section about government censorship plus:
:Khairulazmas Salim | LinkedIn
:www.linkedin.com/in/khairulazmas‎
:Singapore - ‎Senior Marketing Executive at MediaCorp Pte Ltd
I think these deletions may not be from a disinterested editor. S a g a  C i t y (talk) 18:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reinstating deleted information
Talk:Douglas T. Ross

message: Typo: It's "Douglas", not "Douglast" - the "t" in "Douglast" is a mistake!
I can't figure out how to fix it. If you know how, please do so.
:Apologies, Hoyt Nelson Hoytnelson 05:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 09:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In the meantime it is newly written mostly by other users, and restored now. -- Mdd (talk) 23:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection 