lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moatize

message: How big will the coal trains be in terms of
* length in metres?
* length in number of wagons?
* axle load?
* number of engines?
* air or vacuum brakes
* type of couplings?
Tabletop (talk) 06:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Train sizes 

message: Hi Hallel, the World Bank source used states clearly that:
"The Beira Corridor system, operated by CFM-Centro, comprises the Port of Beira and two rail connections with the Port. Beira Port presently handles 2.2 million tons per year. The two rail connections are the Machipanda Line, 317 kilometers, linking Beira with Zimbabwe; and the Sena Line, 552 kilometers, LINKING BEIRA (DONDO) WITH MOATIZE. The latter has two important branches: Inhamitanga -Marromeu with 82 km and Dona Ana -Vila Nova da Fronteira (border with Malawi) with 44 km."
There is no mention of a "Dona Ana-Moatize branch line". In this case, it may be better to use another source which conforms to the text, otherwise it should be reversed because the source does not state what is in the article. Please respect the sources! Teixant (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Bank source
Talk:Global Water Partnership

message: The original, as produced by the GWP Secretariat was written like a promotional piece and not like an encyclopedia article.  I have cleaned up a little of the "bureaucratic speech" in the first paragraph, but it needs more work. --Bejnar (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Edits from GWP Communication Officer Helene Komlos Grill (Gwpwiki) may have conflict of interest problems. --Bejnar (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Promo and advertising language

message: This article needs citations to independent reliable published sources. --Bejnar (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You miss the point. Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) says An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.  No matter how notable the members of an organization are they do no provide notability.  Please find independent sources! --Bejnar (talk) 17:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Valencia, Bukidnon

message: There is a discussion regarding the removal of the word "city" from the article titles of Philippine cities.  This may imminently affect the article name for .  For city names which are not unique, disambiguation alternatives are also being presented.  Formal request for page move may follow after a reasonable time of discussion.  If you wish to participate, please post your comments here.  --JinJian (talk) 04:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: <Cityname> 
<City>
Talk:University of Iloilo

message: Try removing wikilinks for non-notable items in the article so that it does not reflect so much red links; aesthetically speaking the preponderance of red links takes away from the aesthetics of the article. And do provide references please? — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 12:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: The file :File:Uipenlog.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Uipenlog.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Uipenlog.jpg]] 

message: The file :File:Uipenlog.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Uipenlog.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 07:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Uipenlog.jpg]]
Talk:University of Batangas

message: This should be merged as it is not notable enough to have its own article, it fails WP:GNG, and thus should be merged. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 01:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[DZPS]] 
Talk:Urban Bank

message: This is the final JUSTICE preceded by the suicide of President Borlonga: On April 18, 2008, the Supreme Court of the Philippines 2nd Division affirmed the appellate court’s judgment to proceed with the P4.5-billion ($ 1 = P 41)  estafa case against the officers of Urban Bank, namely, Nida S. Santos, Milagros Santiago, Rowena Punzalan, Chulla Formanes, Loida O. Payonga and Amalia Ordas.www.gmanews.tv, Supreme Court upholds litigation for P4.5-B bank estafa case --Florentino floro (talk) 07:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Supreme Court final ruling to proceed with P 4.5 billion estafa case against 4 officers
Talk:Iphigénie

message: This article uses only the Penguin translation, not the French original. It does not give the cast list or a historical account of the first performances. There is also a french WP article which should be used as the basis for the article, in line with wikiproject France. It is unencyclopedic to describe Racine as a French playwright. The play inspired various operas, notably by Gluck. I intend to rewrite a shorter version of the plot with a proper lead section. Please see Phèdre for a model. --Mathsci (talk) 06:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now carefully rewritten the synopsis, using both the french original and the penguin translation, and expanded the article in other ways, as for Phèdre. --Mathsci (talk) 01:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iphigénie
Talk:University of San Jose–Recoletos

message: This article lacks verifiable references; does not follow the Manual of Style; and not written from a neutral point of view. Pls do not remove tag without addressing the pointed issues. 121.97.131.214 (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: Seriously, this needs to be cleaned up to adhere to NPOV. The article is full of blatant violations of this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vliktor (talk • contribs) 08:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was written as an advertisement for the school 
Talk:Battle of Congella

message: In the 2nd blockquote of the 'Siege of British camp' section, I have added 'wife [my emphasis] and daughter' after 'Margaret and Janet' and added a 't' to 'Jane'. 
If they are wrong, could someone please correct them ?
RASAM (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife, Jane and Janet

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
--NJR_ZA (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources to expand and reference this article
Talk:Vallehermoso, Negros Oriental

message: *To the OP of the previous rant. Plese take into consideration that Wikipedia is not a soapbox for political opinions, and also that Wikipedia is not a forum. It is not that we are trying to "suppress" this action. There is no place for it in Wikipedia. At least not in the article space. That is why I reverted your edits to the article. I will not clear the talk page, but other users may, because this talk page is intended for discussions about the article itself, not the subject of it. Thank you. --VandTrack (talk) 07:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Formate

message: This article discusses at length about the metabolic role of formate. However, the current Wikipedia article doesn't talk about it much. So, I think that more information about the biochemical aspect of formate should be added to the current article or to a new article. User8647 (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add information about biochemical aspect of formate
Talk:Phono input

message: I added a link to the more general RCA Connector article.  Two articles for one connector are almost redundant, except that the true phono input incorporates the RCA connector and special circuitry for turntables.
The RCA Connector article should be made to link back here as well.
--AC (talk) 06:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[RCA Connector]] is related. 

message: I changed "magnetic phono cartridge" to "Modern phonograph needles and phono cartridges", because not all turntables use a magnetic phono cartridge... some units have a piezoelectric needle, and there's even a laser cartridge.  I doubt my change is the best catch-all wording though.  --AC (talk) 06:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cartridge/stylus/pickup/needle wording
Talk:Java-gnome

message: Full exception text not needed, a summary and a ref would be enough. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Exception
Talk:B83 nuclear bomb

message: This has to be a joke, the 747 isn't a bomber at all. Even countries that have small air forces and 747s in their Airline inventory don't use them that way, and they certainly don't have B83s. I'm throwing a citation needed on that one and if nobody comes up with a decent source, because that's one hell of an extraordinary claim, I'm deleting it.
24.116.229.115 (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Boeing 747?

message: The article is fine but what is the explosive yield? 87.59.76.151 (talk) 01:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The information was deleted this morning and has been restored.  Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need info on yield! 

message: The correct infobox is  -MBK004 08:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox?

message: The article for the B1 states that by 1995, the B1's nuclear capabilities had been retroactively removed. Yet, this article still lists the B1 as a current carrier. Am I missing something here, or should the B1 be removed from the list included within this article?
Jade Phoenix Pence (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy regarding the B1 Lancer 

message: It's not clear to me the Nuclear Weapons Archive is a reliable source.  For future reference, this USAF site had dimensions and test-date:  https://web.archive.org/web/20170812074657/https://www.hill.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/397189/b83-thermonuclear-bomb/ - Remedial Reading Assistant (talk) 04:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: USAF source

message: The article says 'B77 nuclear component test firings were attributed to the Operation Anvil series in 1975 and 1976, specifically the "Cheese" test shots in Anvil'.  This claim is referenced to the Nuclear Weapons Archive. There are two problems with this reference:  1) This site is self-published and so is not a reliable source.  2)  The referenced source says the association is 'Likely', it does not claim certain knowledge.  A quick Google search does not throw up a reliable source.   Unless a reliable source for the claim can be found, the claim should be removed - Crosbie 02:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Which of the several claims you quote are you suggesting is the problem? Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cheese" tests
Talk:Thomas D. Doubleday

message: There was a large chunk of text in this article copied from , which is a violation of copyright and of Wikipedia rules. I have reverted the text to the state it was in before the material was added, and will attempt to format the article to at least partly conform to Wikipedia recommendations. --Alvestrand (talk) 06:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted material removed 
Talk:Queste

message: As requested on WikiProject Children's Literature, I have checked this article for assessment and agree with the current rating of C class. To improve, I recommend you create a section on the book's cover to replace the comments in the lead section, extend the lead section to provide a comprehensive summary of the article, and rewrite the Synopsis and Character sections to remove technical terms specific to the series and therefore make the article more accessible to those who haven't read the series. If you have any comments on this assessment, please leave them on my talk page. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 12:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:On the Banks of Plum Creek

message: I much appreciate the efforts of those who had created the "Historical Background" section of this article; however, digging into it a bit, it seems it was an unfortunate poster child for why Wikipedia requires sources. Looking back through the article's history, the "facts" in this section had done nothing but wander about aimlessly enjoying many adventures along the way. The current state of the article at any point in time simply represented the assertions of whatever editor had touched it last. The article had been tagged as needing sources since 2008 without any actually being added, and I think 5 years is enough leniency. I would be happy to pitch in and help recreate the section based on actual facts, if someone will point me to a source of same. I did not have any luck with a Google search... maybe someone knows of a Laura Ingalls Wilder biography that could be referenced? 
--Rnickel (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Historical Background" 

message: Mildred Boyle joined Helen Sewell as illustrator of the Little House books beginning with Plum Creek, fourth in the series.
Mildred Boyle at Library of Congress Authorities — with 4 catalog records
Those four records include only two of the five Little House books illus. by Sewell & Boyle. The library does have other records of Boyle works (no idea how many) but illustrators are not always named --especially second illustrators, i presume-- and some that do name her may be incompletely digitized for search.
--P64 (talk) 21:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mildred Boyle 

message: WISH THERE WAS SEX!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:50C1:6378:8D3E:FFB7:AAB6:A8AF (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super boring
Talk:The Freak Box

message: I suggest this article be merged with the article Freak Box as it has essentially the same information, or that it be deleted outright.
Kresock (talk) 23:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Chandra Shumsher Jung Bahadur Rana

message: Does this article need two infoboxes, looks rather confusing. Shyamal (talk) 13:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two infoboxes 

message: About the chandra samser 113.199.234.247 (talk) 11:56, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: Lady voice 103.153.233.128 (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chandra shamsher death reason 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Sir Chandra Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana (restoration).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 25, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-04-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Matt Corby

message: "Inside sources have reported that Matt has blamed his final 2 loss on left wing ALP voters who were not satisfied with destroying the political future of the nation turned on god's gift to Australian music." 
This should be deleted, unless we have verified sources stating this. I'm deleting it, unless anybody has a good reason not to?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.28.92 (talk) 12:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Los Incas

message: Let's please expand this article. Badagnani (talk) 07:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Some sources state that Paul Simon met Los Incas in Europe in the mid-1960s, when they were performing in the same hotel at which he was performing. Is this correct? Badagnani (talk) 07:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This webpage would seem to indicate that this is the case, but they don't cite the source of the interview. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: How did they meet?

message: Why was this song removed?   Badagnani (talk) 07:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal

message: Is there any substantive difference between this group and Urubamba other than a name change? If not, we ought to merge these articles. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Now that Urubamba has been merged into this article, I'm not sure how to link the Spanish article for this band under the Languages sidebar. Los Incas and Urubamba are both still separate entries on Wikidata, and I don't know much about that site and don't want to do anything drastic that might mess things up. --Jessietail (talk) 09:43, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Spanish Wikipedia
Talk:OneTaste

message: :Nicole Prause#Orgasmic_meditation_study 
:I added the information about the founder, but User:Primefac removed it two times in a row. 
:This cult, under investigation by the FBI, tries to "proof" their propaganda with pseudoscientific studies payed by themselfs! 
:Check the discussion here.
--KleinerKorrektor (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OP has been warned of discretionary sanctions, and that using the word  lightly will lead to a topic ban. tgeorgescu (talk)  17:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  OneTaste funded "study" by [[Nicole Prause]] 

message: Now that the Mendocino County Sheriff has no more association with the Unconditional Freedom Project they're openly claiming ownership.
It would seem that the organization isn't as defunct as it appeared to be. Rectitudo (talk) 13:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unconditional Freedom Project now openly part of the OneTaste organization 

message: The Eros Platform feature classes and events hosted by both Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz on their site. Some of their logos incorporate the Onetaste branding, although they appear to be trying to scrub those. This is pretty plainly the same organization with slightly altered branding. Rectitudo (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You have to have reliable sources that say so. You cannot determine this yourself. Skyerise (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Skyerise They plainly state on their own page that they're "by Onetaste". You don't get any more reliable than that. 162.192.2.81 (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You just don't get it. We need third-party sourcing because they could be lying. Skyerise (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Also, a new registered business under a different name is a distinct topic, even if run by some of the same people. If it is notable, a new article should be written about it from third-party sources. If that can't be done, then it's not notable and should not be coatracked onto another article. Skyerise (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebranding as The Eros Project
Template talk:Wikibreak switch

message: is being deleted; please make the necessary adjustments. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to have been done already. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Wikibreak 

message: is now  wrapper; please use  instead. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I've done this. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-wikibreak 

message: is being merged into  (as ); please make the necessary adjustments. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done this one. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempting wikibreak 

message: The documentation for this template contains a template indicating that the documentation should be improved. I can't see that as being the case myself; however, I'd like to make sure. Can someone else please review the template and report here whether or not they think the documentation is sufficient? Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I was actually wondering the same thing, I'll go ahead and remove the tag since nobody has responded. If anyone disagrees, feel free to place back and reply with specifics, thanks. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 15:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation insufficient?
Talk:Battle of Nanpeng Archipelago

message: Can anyone give a location for these islands? Are they also called Zhongpengdao? Is it the islands at 23.300N,117.300E? They seem to be the only ones that fit the description. Anybody know? Xyl 54 (talk) 01:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, my Guangdong Provincial Atlas labels the island chain at this location as Nanpeng Liedao (南澎列岛; Nanpeng Archipelago). The biggest one (less than a kilometer long, and even less across) is labeled in that atlas as Zhong Peng Dao (中澎岛, same as on Google Maps), and the four smaller ones, Ding Peng Dao 顶澎顶, Nan Peng Dao 南澎列岛, Qin Peng Dao 芹澎岛、and Chi Zi Yu  赤仔屿. These small islands appear to be part of Nan'ao County (the main part of which is the much bigger Nan'ao Island some 30 km to the northwest). -- Vmenkov (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:1986 United States Senate election in Alabama

message: Why are there pictures of a pair of buttocks in the info box and why can't I find the image itself to delete in the source editing????? Someone help please! 1bcdbackup (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obviously inappropriate pictures in info box
Talk:HMS Thunderer (1872)

message: This is a mess. Nearly ever source seems contradictory.
Can we get good (i.e. primary archive sources) to clear up any of the following:
* Were both turrets initially power traversed?  Was this done by steam, or by hydraulics?
* Was the fore turret built with power, never powered, or converted after building (1874)?
* What was powered, and what was powered in the fore turret that wasn't powered in the aft? Traverse, elevation, ramming, recuperation, shell lifts?
* Were there hydraulic shell lifts fitted? To one or both?
* How many elevation trunnions were there?  I suspect that all guns had a manual elevation gear which worked the trunnion on the recoilling carriage. There may also have been a second trunnion (similar to that used for Inflexible), where the slideway frame of the carriage could also be raised and lowered by hydraulics, just for loading.
* What were the tasks of the turret crew and how did this change in the 48-28 demanning after the power operation of the fore turret?
Andy Dingley (talk) 10:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  By "recuperation" here I mean a hydraulic ram to run the guns back out again after they had recoiled and stopped moving (rather than pulley blocks or a geared rack), not the hydro-pneumatic recuperators that would take another few decades. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thanks for clarifying what you meant; that I don't know.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

text: * "steam traverse" has been used as a contemporary shorthand for "power traverse" (i.e. as opposed to hand-working it). The mechanism was actually a hydraulic motor, with hydraulic pressure generated from a steam engine and pump, outside the turret. I see no evidence or sourcing for the turrets being worked directly with a steam engine. In particular, I have never seen any ship fitted with steam pipes to a turret or gunhouse, and any fixed steam engine would thus have to be mounted to the non-rotating barbette, making the working of a large turret (captained from within the turret) awkward, or at least involving obvious equipment outside the turret. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power operated turrets