lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Khadki

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Khadki&oldid=252896666
The displayed version ( as of 2015) is rejected. The references have been copied from the above article and misquoted.
--Sukratu Barve (talk) 05 November 2015   —Preceding undated comment added 07:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The version endorsed by the originator of this topic

message: The Marathas were clearly not an Empire, they deny being a Confederacy...therefore they should just be called Marathas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.182.56.188 (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Maratha

message: Content which has been removed and new material that has been added is unacceptable.
Please add differing views with suitable comments without deleting original content.
For deleting any content from my original article, I am open to discussion about the details.
--Wikisukratu(talk) 28 August 2011  —Preceding undated comment added 11:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ Disputed Modifications to the Article]] 

message: Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: The article is of extremely low quality and it seems it has been written by a mythistorian.The battle was a British victory but some fanatic had put it to as a Maratha one.I changed it correctly to a British victory and I have also given the appropriate link( http://www.nam.ac.uk/online-collection/detail.php?acc=1971-02-33-219-1 )for it.I hope Wikipedia looks into this matter and rewrites the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.231.236 (talk) 06:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality Article 

message: I decided to rewrite the article as it had been shoddily written and wrongly mentioned a Maratha victory instead of a British one.I have written from the account given in the official Pune District Gazetteer site which has a reliable and historically correct description of the battle.Also there are a few citations from the British Army Museum website.I had changed a few details in the article relating to the number of casualties and outcome of the battle which had been previously incorrect.I have given the links and references to the changes.I hope a military history expert would look into this article and suggest suitable changes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans Tork (talk • contribs) 08:45, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewriting the Article 

message: Please check out the version written by me before 2008 using British and Indian
records, as well as field surveys I carried out in the area.
-Sukratu Barve  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukratu Barve (talk • contribs) 16:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Version before 2008
Talk:Noel Mazzone

message: I dont know how to add this to the reference list, but http://northcarolinastate.scout.com/2/333946.html shows that this guy went from NCSU to Ole Miss before he went to the Jets/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.188.152 (talk) 23:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Capazoo

message: This page is a valid entry for a social networking site.
I will add some references to print publications about it in Quebec Canada.
This page seems to be a valid stub, i've removed the tag, how about a link to the website itself--Liekmudkipz (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:San Benito Mountain

message: It is patently false to claim that San Benito Mountain is in the San Francisco Bay Area.
By that definition, King City, in Southern Monterey County, would also be "in the San Francisco Bay Area."
The article will be corrected to reflect reality.--Truthiness (talk) 01:54, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: San Francisco Bay Area??
Talk:Commercially available radioisotopes

message: This article can be a section in Radionuclide. Now it reads like a catalog. --Kkmurray (talk) 22:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree --johndoe616 (talk) 24:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Ionizing radiation article, the radionuclide article and this one perhaps should all be included as one? -- Haruth (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Needs an expert to give some context to this list. Would also be nice to see the commercial application of each isotope. -- Haruth (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are hundreds of the things. Presently, since all the radionuclide Wikis got consolidated under things like isotopes of tin, it's much more difficult. But if you want to expant on the inforation in those articles by listing uses, sources, and so on, so so. I think the list subject is too long for a stand-alone list, but I could be wrong. SBHarris 20:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Section

message: We have some list articles about commercial products like list of graphing software, but they tend to be rather short, and construct new lists of things you can't find in a catalog. But there are catalogs of radioisotope supplies. The RITVER GmBH catalog has 47 separate radionuclides in many products for sale, and that's just the first I find.  WP is not a phonebook, an auto parts catalog, a chemical products catalog, or a commerical radionuclide catalog. The only use I can think of for an article like this is a list article of commercial catalogs, sources, and suppliers. Even then it would be pretty close to list of spamlinks. SBHarris 19:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole article and concept should be deleted
Talk:WIQR (Alabama)

message: There was apparently a Federal ethics investigation with WIQR at the heart of it but it will take more research and careful sourcing to craft a balanced section for this article.  Indeed, it would be wise to use the FCC database and other sources to expand the ownership history section (which is itself complicated by bankruptcy, silent periods, loss of license, license renewal, and more drama) before delving into this controversy.  Here are a few starter sources for the controversy:
*http://ethics.house.gov/Media/PDF/exhibit17.pdf
*
*Since Earl F. Hilliard is still alive, WP:BLP concerns will affect any section about this controversy as well.  (n.b. And when it's done here, the article for the former Congressman is woefully short and under-referenced so a tailored-for-biography version would be useful there, too.) - Dravecky (talk) 06:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for future expansion 
Talk:Wilhelm Taubert

message: Alfred Dörffel's book of music played by the Leipzig G. from 1781-1881 -- , -- lists on page 72, 3 symphonies by Taubert- F major from 1846, B minor 1851 (just uploaded recently to a Danish site and now to IMSLP also, op.80- I'm guessing, -hopefully- correctly, that it's sym. 2, but I guess I shouldn't guess...) , C minor 1856. Was there a 4th not performed or written in Leipzig during that period 1781-1881, and where does it fit in (before these three? After? Somewhere inside? Did he compose the 4th after 1881? Thanks!) As to 4 quartets, Hofmeister Monatsbericht lists nos. 2, 3 and 4... but I am now curious about no. 1 :) - the key and op. no. - just because I get curious about those things, though. Schissel | Sound the Note! 08:50, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  4 symphonies?
Talk:Electoral results for the Division of Bennelong

message: I'm sure most people know that a general federal election wasn't held in Australia in 2017, but would some people not know that 2017 was a by-election and need that reminder? Qwerty123M (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it be stated that 2017 was a by-election?
File talk:NE 565ad.jpg

message: Does someone have the source about the Magyar's position here in 565 AD? Mallerd (talk) 22:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Mallerd. I got the position of the Magyars in this time from the article Hungarian Peoples on Wikipedia. Thomas Lessman (talk) 01:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you, I'll search for the source from there. Mallerd (talk) 15:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Would be nice to have the index to the numbered countries  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.89.179 (talk) 11:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did the image come from? 

message: [[File:[http://<a%20href="http://goo.gl/mc9cY"><img%20src="http://c1109.hizliresim.com/11/9/12/11666.jpg"></a> <a href="http://goo.gl/mc9cY"><img src="http://c1109.hizliresim.com/11/9/12/11666.jpg"></a>]g]]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.167.170.44 (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  lakhmid danisty
Talk:List of bats

message: Hi, I'm trying to fix up this list, so if you want to add on to it or improve it, you can help by keeping a consistent formatting:
*Keep taxa alphabetized by subfamily, then genus, then by species
*List a species' common name first (if there is one), then scientific name name
*Italicize genus and species names (Pteropus=Pteropus)
*Pipe around the common name, not the scientific name (Little brown bat=Little brown bat)
*I know people have a lot of feelings about capitalization of common names, but just try to keep it "article title caps style"—capitalize the first letter of the first word only, unless other words of the common name are proper nouns (Big brown bat, New Georgian monkey-faced bat)
Cheers! Enwebb (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting moving forward

message: I'm not a biologist but isn't the name of this article a little odd?  All species in Order Chiroptera are placental mammals.  Wouldn't a better name be List of Species or Sub taxa of Order Chiroptera? -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a fork of the massive List of placental mammals (270k+).  I'm not a biologist, so I forked along the topic headings, which were by Order.  If you can reformat better, please do Mbisanz (talk) 22:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. John Hill (talk) 01:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Ice-water separation

message: Proposed merge from Iceolator hash as it is the same thing.Mjpresson (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the better article to merge to as it has some refs and an image of the subject.Mjpresson (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Same thing. "Iceolator" is a made-up word.yonnie (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:When Your Lover Has Gone

message: To Whom It May Concern,
This discussion page is not the place for debating the pros and cons of speedy deletion, but it would be really nice if editors can be allowed to develop an article page in good faith without having their work speedily deleted. I have tried to set up an article concerning a well-known song that has been recorded by established artists continuously since the early 1930s. Thank you. --Technopat (talk) 22:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:2007

message: (Note: The following conversation is copied from the user talk pages of the two editors involved, one of which was me. -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 22:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to add the remaining 299 bots to the chronicle of wikipedia. `'Míkka>t 17:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your offer that I add the other 299 or so bots; unfortunately, I have more important things to do with my time, as I suspect you do, and all of the other editors I know. If you do in fact have plans to add the other bots, I apologize and will certainly give you time to do so; if you have no plans, I'd really like to know why you think it's advantageous to have exactly one bot listed on this page. Do you really think that a bunch of other editors are going to show up and fix the page? Or that somehow the page is improved with just one bot listed, rather than potentially misleading a naive reader into thinking that somehow that bot was particularly special? -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 17:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care what and when other editors will add and what a naive reader will think. Just like you, I have other things to do. And among these other things there is no intention to delete correct and verifiable information on a whim. The bot in qestion exists, does a useful thing, and part of the history of wikipedia, which is not paper. The rest is irrelevant and I have no intention to waste more time on this issue.  `'Míkka>t 22:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing bots - yes or no?
Talk:IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Sciences Society

message: IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science is being debated as being a fringe journal in relation to the article tired light. 132.205.99.122 (talk) 22:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

message: IEEE Nuclear & Plasma Sciences Society should redirect here, as it's in the logo. 132.205.99.122 (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IEEE Nuclear & Plasma Sciences Society
Talk:Xenobiotic metabolism

message: Shouldn't this be merged with drug metabolism????  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.137.168.120 (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 'History of ...' link is dead. Do we have a better one? --Ayacop (talk) 06:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up. Replaced with a web archive link Tim Vickers (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link 
Talk:Cuisine of Hawaii/Temp

message: (Brennan, 2000, p. 249)
;Oceanian feast - Polynesian Hawaiian style
*Kalua pork
*Laulaus (leaf-wrapped fish and pork bundles)
**Laulaus are typically leaf-wrapped packets of fish and meat.  They may be substituted for kalua pig at a Hawaiian feast or poi dinner.  They are similar to Samoan or Fijian palusami, but do not contain coconut milk.  In Hawaiian cuisine, laulaus are double wrapped, first in taro, then ti leaves.  Traditionally, laulaus are filled with a mixture of different kinds of meat such as Boston pork butt, beef chuck, salted salmon, and salted butter-fish.(Brennan, 2000, p. 116)
*Kamano lomi (Lomi salmon)
*Haupia (Coconut lu'au desert)
;Contemporary use of earth oven
I just wanted to point out that the description of the ancient Hawaiian use of the imu holds for contemporary use as well.  I think it would help to state that the practice hasn't changed.  There's a chapter called "The Traditional Lu'au Feast" in Philpotts Great Chefs of Hawaii (2004) that illustrates the modern practice in extensive detail, with Sam Choy directing the operation. It will make a great addition to this section.  We should think about splitting it out of the Ancient times section into a subsection of its own as the practice has barely changed over the centuries.  Also, the section makes it seem like Hawaiians only cooked with an imu, which I think is incorrect considering the intensive labor required. —Viriditas | Talk 23:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Hawaiian luau
Talk:Planet Unicorn

message: Hi!  I quoted the tag-line from the show and the searchbot has tagged it.  It is right?
Conor (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page tagged by bot 

message: I reckon I've brought the stub up to standard now.  Does anyone want to do the honours and remove the tags?
Conor (talk) 23:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag removal? 

message: Apparently the official Planet Unicorn website is gone now and the original youtube uploads have disappeared. Whats up? --RyanTee82 (talk) 08:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Planet Unicorn website gone?
Template talk:WikiProject Technology

message: There is a discussion here regarding Samsung Galaxy S20 FE. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk:Samsung_Galaxy_S20_FE#Merger_Proposal_to_main_Samsung_Galaxy_S20_article 

message: The redirect T:WPTECH has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 01:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:T:WPTECH]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:First Leicester

message: Is there any good rational for having a complete run down of First Leicester's tickets (along with pricing and availability) on this page?  This is a encyclopaedia article on First Leicester; the company, not First Leicester; special offers this month.  It's not here to replicate information that properly belongs on their company website.  I'd consider all this information (other than maybe the briefest of mentions) as un-encyclopaedic and advertising, besides being uncited.  Wikipedia is not a travel brochure.  --Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In a word, no. Further information for the IP editor currently re-adding it can be found at WP:UKBQDRIVE. MickMacNee (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where do the fares need to go ? If i can find them all out do i post them here on the article? Do they need to be in a table ? Stewiewispa (talk) 12:58, 08 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fares should not be added to the article at all. See WP:NOT. Jenuk1985 | Talk 13:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: in my view fares SHOULD be added to the article or somewere within these pages. Stewiewispa (talk) 13:18, 08 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a travel guide. If you want to publish fares, I'd suggest starting your own website, there are many free hosting providers out there. Jenuk1985 | Talk 13:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ok but i still think as other some other users would do that fares even just multijourney tickets such as day week month savers Stewiewispa (talk) 12:58, 08 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: First's website has all the infomation you'll ever need on fares. So we don't need it. Arriva436talk</b>]]/contribs 13:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

text: ok i will leave it as it then. Stewiewispa (talk) 12:58, 08 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fares 

message: Thank you to msalmon who fixed my error earlier other info could be added to this page or even to the article at the bottom if anybody has any suggestions please talk ">stewiewispa(Talk)
No problem, I just want to keep it as a standardised route table, without any major changes Msalmon (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Route Table

message: According to , First only own 94% of Leicester Citybus Ltd.  I wonder who owns the remaining 6%? Can't find anything. May be worth putting in if we find out. Morwen - Talk 23:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership
Talk:Kidsgrove

message: Is this article the proper place for a resume of the crimes of Neilson? The Roman Candle (talk) 21:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A very brief resume is reasonable, but there's far too much detail included IMO. --Malleus Fatuorum 14:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Donald Neilson]] 

message: ICL used to be opposite GEC in West Avenue. It was previously English Electric Leo Marconi Computers.
I worked there from 1978 to 1988 and I know the buildings have been demolished, but ICL became Fujitsu in 2002 and I don't know the date of the demolition.
It deserves a mention as much as GEC does! Mdrb55 (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about ICL?
Talk:Synoikismos

message: As to whether the two pages should be merged - yes.  The definition could be strengthened, as it begs the question of why democracy evolved in the Greek context but not in other places where such centralization is known to have occurred.
A second yes (the previous is unsigned but it is not me). the material is the same; one word is the transliterated Greek, the other is the Latinized form. Same word, same concept, same material.Dave (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ana Maria Teles Carreira

message: An editor argues that all ambassadors are inherently notable under :WP:BIO, as they qualify as politicians who have held international office. But is that what is meant by "held international office"? I think of the latter as meaning former officials of the :United Nations or :League of Nations. --Orange Mike  | Talk 13:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how I understand it as well. Javier Solana is automatically notable for his function (and he of course received loads of press). A random ambassador, even though it is an important fuction, is not automatically notable (and is not a politician of course, but a diplomat).Fram (talk) 14:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles John Hodgson for a related discussion.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 16:08, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Kirkby Lonsdale

message: How do you pronounce it.  Is it the same as Kirkby (kirby)? 94.168.8.105 (talk) 11:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. -- Dr Greg  talk  17:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do).  Laplacemat (talk) 11:53, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCHT external link 
Talk:Kirton in Lindsey

message: Hyphenated or not? Any views? . . Mean as custard (talk) 19:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Kirton in Lindsey / Kirton-in-Lindsey
Talk:Leiston

message: Earlier versions of the article had facts that were characteristic of Leiston as opposed to every other small town.  Someone deleted them, making the article more like an almanac entry.  Leiston is not a typical rural Suffolk town.  A famous quote was like:  "It's a shock to visit Leiston, to find this tiny island of the industrial Midlands plopped among the remote farms of Suffolk."  The Leiston Works worker's culture was totally unlike that of farmers in nearby towns.  For business visitors (and posh Summerhill School parents up from London), the Leiston accent was a shocker.  From the mouth of an industrial engineer would come an almost incomprehensible East Anglian "peasant brogue".  Standard greeting among males: "Ey bwee, wahtya DOOnenn bwee?" (Hey boy, what are you doing then, boy?).  About 20 years ago a wave of drug culture and associated problems hit Leiston.   Fun (characteristic) facts and significant facts about Leiston should be restored.
The article says: "...the now decommissioned Magnox reactors of Sizewell A and the more modern Pressurised Water Reactor of Sizewell B."  There's nothing "more modern" about water cooling Sizewell B than the innovative liquid sodium cooled Sizewell A.  Water cooling was a much older (and American) technology that required shutting down the whole power plant to change any fuel rod.  In Sizewell A you could change one rod at a time as needed without turning off the electricity generation.  It was hardly ever turned off, for decades.  Sizewell A: the Pride of Britain in its day. 2605:6000:ED08:B300:658A:8651:F8AB:A2AF (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have well-sourced information then why not add it to the article yourself? Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 11:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting local facts, and the local character, have been deleted. 

message: Still exists, still has a railway line going through it, and ought to be available for passenger use by people from Leiston and tourists. And even extended for use by Thorpness and Aldeburgh. 80.47.169.101 (talk) 11:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leiston Railway Station
Talk:Longridge

message: Right, I have added a couple of new sections. I'll tidy them up when I have time and I'll add some pictures of Longridge that I've taken. I'll add a few proper references too. Izax143 (talk) 11:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Edits 