lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Assise sur la ligece

message: Since we already have an Assizes of Jerusalem article, should we just merge this info there? Adam Bishop 00:25, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Three paragraphs copied with sourcing and bibliography from the Crusader States. That article is struggling size wise (too big) so will probably be copyedited more concisely. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 16:05, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied content from [[Crusader States]]; see that page's history for attribution
Talk:Marc Favreau

message: He starred as Sol in a popular French course for TV Ontario, and did this as a Canadian. He spoke French during the skits, and translated words and expressions into English during the show.
He's shied away from politics in his work, but in one monologue he made fun of the two levels of governments: the provincial government which he called "le petit garnement", or the little brat, and the federal government which he called "le grand garnement, le garnement feuille d'erable", or the big brat, the maple leaf brat; punning "federal" and "feuille d'erable", which is of course the symbol of Canada and the emblem of the federal government. Vincent 00:25, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: we truly lost a generous and grandiose prince of the most imaginative words today.
much tears. RIP Marc. Ô SOL EST MIS HAUT. --Zenzizi 17:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIP
Talk:Focus on the Family Radio Theatre

message: This article was recently nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/"focus on the family radio theatre" for the archived discussion. -- Francs2000 | Talk  00:28, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Of course.  This is a one-line non-article, a merge is eminently sensible. This is the creator's sole contribution, which looks a lot like Gastroturfing. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  22:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Ace of Spades (disambiguation)

message: Sources - Schott's Sporting, Gaming & Idling Miscellany (2004) and Chartered Institute of Taxaton. Alf 00:30, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Design

message: The article says that "the soldiers were quick to pick up this misconception" and that "this custom was believed to be so effective" but also says it was "erroneously believed."  Which was it?  Someone with knowledge on the subject needs to clear these up and give citations to back them.--Nleamy 02:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no contradiction that I can see. Just because the US soldiers believed something was effective doesn't mean that they didn't waste their time doing it. Source will be forthcoming. --Sus scrofa 15:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   Perhaps the paragraph is just not written as clearly as it could be.  For example, the statement that "soldiers were quick to pick up this misconception."   Was the misconception that the NLF believed that the Ace of Spades represented bad things (and if so, does one really "pick up" on a "misconception" or would it be better to say that the soldiers were under the false impression that the NLF believed this) or was the misconception that they thought that the NLF believed that the Ace of Spades was bad, but quickly picked up on their false assumption (and hence, why would they continue to do this?).  The paragraph makes a bit more sense now (and I think the likely intention is the first choice) but I think it could likely be re-written.--Nleamy 20:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I've clarified the wording in the latest edit. --Sus scrofa 21:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: If a group of people were playing cards after passage of the Stamp Act, could a tax collector demand to see their cards (or at least their Ace of Spades)?
If it did not bear a tax stamp, was only the person who happened to be holding it subject to punishment?
What was the punishment?
Wnt (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punishment? 
Talk:Little Germany, Manhattan

message: Hi, I translated the page in French, but I'm sceptical about the demographic datas of the article :
*At the beginning of the 20th century, Little Germany had a population of almost 500,000 people
But in the introduction :
*an area bounded by Avenues A and B and 7th and 10th Sts
How 500 000 (the population of Wyoming, a thrid of today's Manhattan's population and a quarter of the population of the borough in 1900) can reside in only 3 blocks ?--Revas 00:32, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics of Little Germany

message: Hi I'm not sure how to do this but there is also a Little Germany in Bradford, West Yorkshire in the UK. It's an old area of warehouses and mills dating back to the nineteenth century and is now under redevelopment.
:Changed Little Germany into a disambiguation page. Hope this is OK. -- Chris 73 | Talk 14:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation Query

message: Hi, I'd like to correct "Zietung"; it's "Zeitung" (newspaper).
Also, I guess it's "Hessen", not "Hesse" (Hessen being a German State) further on.
Thank you.--Ewlise77 (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made those changes, but in the future you should feel free to make such corrections yourself. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Orthography in Paragraph "Growth" 

message: Would it be possible for someone to put up a map of the area?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.4.47 (talk) 05:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Arthur E. Reimer

message: Calling SLP an offshoot of SP gets it backwards, as reflected (correctly) in related articles.  Tribune 00:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sectarian advertising, as far as I'm concerned. I don't like the sidebar boxes as a general statement of principle, they steal space that could be used for cool graphics, look like crap, and are doubtlessly unused by 99.9745% of WP users. The "DeLeonism" boxes are positively the worst though, because they magically keep reappearing — even though whether there is even an -ism called "DeLeonism" is very debatable in and of itself. LIke I say: sectarian advertising. Burger King is gone, but the Whopper ads run on... Carrite (talk) 06:34, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I hate the "DeLeonism" information boxes

message: In the off chance that a relative of Arthur E. Reimer finds this page, please do not hesitate to get in touch if you have additional information, family photos, etc. that can be put into the public record. Thanks! —Tim Davenport, Early American Marxism website, Corvallis, OR, MutantPop@aol.com Carrite (talk) 08:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to relatives
Talk:Sicilian Defence, Smith–Morra Gambit, Siberian Trap

message: Could someone more knowledgable perhaps flesh out this article with more words and fewer abbreviated descriptions?  It's virtually impossible to even glean a coherent message unless one is intimately familiar with chess terms and notations.  I thought Wikipedia was supposed to be a little more for the general public? 209.6.192.104 (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarity
Talk:Harry Stinson

message: This article has survived a VFD nomination with the result of No consensus. --Allen3 talk 01:06, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
This Stinson character is funny!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.186.29.65 (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: VFD results
Talk:The Del-Vikings

message: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Dell-Vikings_%28The%29_-_1957_-_S.K._31.01.2006.jpg  Stephan KŒNIG 17:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mispelling: as The Dell-Vikings

message: ...to become Fifth Dimension? [Aquarius/Let the sunshine in & their Cream's rendition of Sunshine of your love]. Were they the same combo?  Stephan KŒNIG 23:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Versatiles were Kripp Johnson, Chuck Jackson, Don Jackson, Arthur Budd and Edward Everette after Mercury won the lawsuit over the usage of the name Del Vikings (no matter the spelling). This formation only existed from late 1957 to sometime in 1958, and mainly did background and overdub duties. 178.165.163.188 (talk) 15:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Versatiles?... 

message: "Lerchey formed another Del Vikings group in the mid-90s shortly before his death in January 29, 2005"  The mid-90s are "shortly" before 2005?  Ten years!!?? 5.34.85.72 (talk) 04:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: The article needs more sources, especially toward the end; there is a lot of unsourced stuff there. I have tagged it for that and for factual accuracy. Regarding accuracy, the first question I have is whether the group still exists in any form. I cannot find any indication of its existence online, but the article uses the present tense. Because I cannot find any indication that the group still exists, I have removed the infobox information on its years active (unclear) and on current and former members (also unclear). (Oddly, Norman Wright--who passed away in 2010--was listed as a current member.) If anyone knows of a source that shows that the group (or some offshoot of it) does still exist, we can re-add the information. SunCrow (talk) 21:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just removed a lot of the unsourced and confusing material. I have also added some sourced material on "Come Go With Me" and "Whispering Bells." The article still needs more sources. SunCrow (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources; accuracy issues
Talk:We Sold Our Soul for Rock 'n' Roll

message: Confusing; were "Warning" and "Laguna Sunrise" every on a release? Which one? What track numbers? ~ Strathmeyer 21:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The CD version that I owned had in the inner sleeve a photo of a really creepy woman inside a casket, dressed with some kind of shroud and holding a cross. It's not mentioned in this article. Should it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvargas78 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inner artwork 

message: When the album was released on CD, the tracks "Wicked World", "Warning" and "Laguna Sunrise" were omitted due to CD space restrictions.
That can't be true, if the duration of 74 minutes is right. 74 minutes fits to CD easily. 85.217.20.33 (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD limit? 

message: Where's the source for the band making no money whatsoever from the album? No performance / writing royalties???  Lovingboth (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No money?
Talk:Historical musicology

message: Thia article has NOTHING to do with the academic discipline of historical musicology.
: I agree, putting up a vote for deletion, this is about a 2004 Schotland rave phenomenon --Jahsonic 00:25, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I have now rewritten the article so that it is about a discipline of historical musicology.
Capitalistroadster 06:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article now rewritten

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 00:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: On what basis is it asserted that "the history of popular music is generally not studied within the discipline of musicology."? I don't believe the disciplines are, um, disciplined that stringently.Rikyu 23:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement is inaccurate as "discipline of musicology," however, as "discipline of historical musicology," this is generally true.  Departments which have subfields of "historical musicology" tend to do so in order to separate out non-Western or popular music studies.  --Myke Cuthbert 20:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not the case in my experience at the UW-Madison, where history, theory, and ethno play mix-and-match...theorists study cellphone ringtones, ethnomusicologists look at Wagner, historians study radio broadcasting. I feel more comfortable with a less-sweeping statement, and have edited to suit--take a look.Rikyu 20:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No popular music?

message: Please give a look at the article Music History (not History of Music) and see if you agree that the two articles should be merged.  Music History, is generally speaking, what the discipline of Historical musicology is called when taught at the undergraduate level.  It might be better to merge Music History into Historical musicology rather than vice versa, since people will always want to know why "Music History" doesn't cover popular and non-western music (reason: classes called "Music History" and scholars who call themselves "Music historians" tend not to; those who do tend to choose other titles).  --Myke Cuthbert 20:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the thrust of "Music History" is "academic study" of the history of music, which is another way of saying "historical musicology," I see no problem in merging the entries. It also seems to me that "Music history" is a more likely search term. It certainly gets more Google hits (1.3 million versus 50,000, give or take).Rikyu 20:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Music History?
Talk:Cuttyhunk Island

message: Is it true to say that for Gosnold, the New World was "North America"? Didn't the New World include both North and South America?
The RussBot changed the link to "America" in the History section to link to "North America". While this gets rid of ambiguity, is it accurate?
CrimsonLine 01:31, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
: I've changed the link from North America to The Americas. I believe that is what is intended by the text. Although the English expeditions were going specifically to North America (America Sepentrionalis on old maps), the phrase is talking about the "New World" in general, which is what the Americas article is about. There is also the New World article, which is a possible link. Mike Dillon 15:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: America --> North America

message: User "Cuttyhunk" just added a sentence stating that only 33 people live on Cuttyhunk year-round. The sentence now follows a statement that there are 86 year-round residents. Perhaps one or the other statement is true, but certainly both cannot be true, and left to stand as is.
CrimsonLine 15:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: How many year-round residents?

message: The link to Sow and Pigs reef describes a reef in Australia, not off Cuttyhunk. Perhaps there are two reefs with that name?? Olschner (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sow and Pigs Reef

message: This assertion isn't sourced and thus its accuracy is highly uncertain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.8.218.251 (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   "rocks  elsewhere found only in the mountains of Vermont and New Hampshire"
Talk:Plan 1919

message: The full text of this plan is available in fuller's memoirs and Liddel Hart's Sword and the pen. I think the original source would be very useful for this article and could possibly be posted in full a wikisource since works rom 1919 are probaly in public domain.--Gary123 01:34, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first two sentences of the background section do not need citations. It is not an argument but common knowledge that WW1 was a war of attrition with innovation as a key task of the major participants. To argue otherwise would require a citation and I defy anyone to find an academic source in which the first two sentences of the background section are even questioned regardless of conclusion. 
Even if such discussion should be found, the citations rightly belong on the general World War 1 page, and not a page about Plan 1919 specifically.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:588A:2E00:64CB:224:5E7E:DB1A (talk) 09:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-citation
Talk:Beer in Poland

message: I would like to develop this page alot more. --Jseidel 01:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How are these beer brands pronounced?
:Pronunciation in Polish is very straightforward. It's nearly 1:1 with spelling. See Polish pronunciation guide. --Grzes 12:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciations 

message: The Polish knights did not participate in crusades because of lack of mead in the Middle East, not beer. --Grzes 12:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact Leszek wrote about both: beer and mead. You can check it in polish wiki, as I wrote about this some time ago. Gardomir 18:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leszek the White 

message: The article says "Polish brewers made more than 30 hectoliters of beer in 2005".  Obviously a couple of zeros are missing here :-)  Could someone correct it asap ? Jotel 11:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake to be corrected 

message: I added several varieties and links to other wiki pages. Anybody know the 5th largest brewery and so on?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelskit (talk • contribs) 20:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Varieties

message: This article seems like it should be moved to breweries of Poland; it's mostly about companies than the beer itself. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer or breweries? 
Talk:Python Imaging Library

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:56, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: Please see:
* http://svn.scipy.org/svn/scipy/trunk/INSTALL.txt
* http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/README.txt
before arguing. Maxerickson 00:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scipy and Numpy Don't Use PIL

message: Hello all, from a quick Google search it turns out that Pillow is actually a fork of PIL that is very updated. Perhaps this could be reflected in the article, I'm not too sure about how i should do this Ajlee2006 (talk) 12:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The page already mentions Pillow, what did you have in mind? The page should probably be move to Pillow (library) with Pillow as main focus and PIL mentioned in the history?. Jonpatterns (talk) 11:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Pillow

message: image=image.open('rabbit.jpg')
carrot=image.open('carrot.jpg')
image.paste(carrot,(50,50),carrot
image.show() 5.122.136.220 (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  format pil import image
Talk:Arj Barker

message: This article reads like a newspaper "lifestyles section" blurb based on a press release (no offense to those who have worked on it so far). I think it can be tightened up quite a bit, but I'd rather have someone who knows the subject of the article do it. - dcljr (talk) 01:59, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Did my best about that, but someone with a better grasp on both Arj and Wikipedia style should go over it as well. --Charron 03:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup-tone

message: So he graduated high school at 15 years old? That's something worth of note if that's true...  -Ben S.- 21:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I found (and added) a couple of sources supporting the fact that he graduated in 1989. His date of birth is also supported by a reference (admittedly only IMDb), so in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, I can only assume it's true. DH85868993 (talk) 09:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in 1974 graduated high school in 1989
Talk:The Hindu

message: Under the section "Partial list of Directors", there is an invisible section entitled "reviews". Anybody know why it's invisible? Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 12:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Invisible section

message: * Education Plus
* The hindu features
* The Hindu Centre
* The Hindu Centre for Politics and Public Policy
These four are all redirects to this page, but there are no mention of them anywhere in the article. Although I can't be sure if it matches the Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion policy, should't these be deleted?
Note: "Education Plus" and "The hindu features" were merged to this article following a discussion here.--YTRK (talk) 13:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 
Talk:Code of Kalantiaw

message: The article characterizes Kalantiaw as "mythical", implying a long historical tradition that acknowledged its truth, or some basis to it. Yet it was actually written within the last 100 years, and has been established as a hoax, and a most cruel one at that which depicted pre-Hispanic Filipinos as barbaric.
Don't want to touch it for now, but perhaps Kalantiaw can be called by something other than "mythical"? --Anyo Niminus 16:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth or Hoax? 

message: Commentary on Code of Kalantiaw
Code is a set of standards or norms with peculiarity character. Originally, it is a socio-political in nature and character to resolve conflicts in a certain community.  The word itself came to its usage and existence during the primitive or prehistoric period of the Philiipines. The first written code was the Kalantiaw.  According to the tarsila among Iranuns, the term Kalantiaw was a name of a datu who ruled ancient Aninipay now Panay.  He was of Bornean (Burunai in Iranun terminology)
Huh? Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content moved here from the "See also" section 

message: So the original text is in Spanish or did Marco provide an original in another language? --Error (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original text
Talk:Stormcrow

message: Well, so anxious was I to get another Wikipedia article, preferably a Tolkien one, that I've picked up on a little red link to write up. It's not terribly exciting. I did think about quoting from The Two Towers on this one, but don't really know the rules on quoting, and so I thought it best to leave it. Kris Hansen 02:17, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chalupa

message: This page had been redirected to Taco Bell.  Pretty ironic, as the item that Taco Bell calls a chalupa more closely resembles a taco (I mentioned this in the article).  I'm sure someone else can correct, and/or expand upon, what I've added to the article.  (And now I wish I had a chalupa.) -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:45, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the recipe to the Wikibooks cookbook and applied a link, tidied up the description and moved the issue of Slavic surnames to a seperate page. --richiau
I removed a reference to McDonald's. There are no Google results showing that they ever served anything like that. It was probably just some random dumb change. Drano 16:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: See chalupa (disambiguation), there's also a link at the top of chalupa. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 16:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Chalupa, NOT "chalupas" is Mexican dish. NOT some easy to sell from a drive in window monstrosity. It is pork and beans with cumin as a primary flavor. This article is an insult to humanity. It is as if fried chicken was somehow defined as KFC. I was making chalupa decades ago with pork and beans and it had NOTHING to do with little drive thru size taco mutations.24.93.109.183 (talk) 04:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowest common denominator
Talk:Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

message: It was suggested that this article should be renamed United States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.  The vote is shown below:
* RENAME to match China's Human Rights Record of the United States 132.205.45.110 02:46, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just go ahead and move it! No admin action required here. --Irpen 07:03, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 19:54, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:RM