lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inprocomm

message: 1) I intend to add InProComm's wireless products to this page in a moment (I will add other information, but finding valid citations to back it all up is rather difficult).
2) This is a dead and defunct company - their original website is dead (it does not redirect to MediaTek), and it is very difficult to find any information on what happened to them (e.g. if you are unfortunate enough to have one of their wireless cards in your laptop) - hence I created the article so that there is a reference somewhere with this information.
-Carlos —Preceding undated comment added 03:25, 15 October 2007‎ (UTC)
I'm going to make a very important correction.  Inprocomm's chips were the IPN2120 and 2220, not the 2200.
-Jeff  —Preceding comment was added at 00:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that InProComm, later Inprocomm, was primarily or formerly a “California-based Company founded in July 2000 with its design center located in Hsinchu, Taiwan” named Integrated Programmable Communications, Inc.
-Lomkimarsh (talk) 14:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: From InProComm to Inprocomm
Talk:Christopher de Bellaigue

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Celestine Sibley

message: While some of the article is a bit subjectively biased toward how great a writer Ms. Sibley was, what specific parts are considered to be a neutrality issue?  I've read most of her books, met her in person several times, and would be honored to help round this out.  I don't see any factual inaccuracies that I can tell. Mapleleaves 03:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there was much issue. I removed a few complimentary terms and with them the npov tag. Aleta Sing 14:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality Issue

message: the article provides the hint that Sibley had written a bigger bunch of books but fails in describing even the main areas and the way of dealing it in the books. further the reading list is a mangling of own works of the person and third party books. this should be split. event it remains a bit unclear what nature those last mentioned works in the text is or what role Sibley played for it. its further "burried" in the text that Sibley was an eager and acceptedwriter on legal cases. maybe it would even be interesting to sumarize even the areas of her daily works so that a rough categorizing of this aspect is brought to th reader in the beginning. sorry, but the article in its current evolvement stage is not to well serving the informational desires of an ezyclopedic reader by its design. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 09:41, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article missing the main point

message: Changed U.S. House of Representatives to Georgia House of Representatives; added a reference to the relevant bill and started the reference list. ProfMontgomery (talk) 16:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Small change, started the reference list

message: Unfortunately the previous article here was in its entirety an unsalvageable copyright violation, as it was a direct copy of the New Georgia Encyclopedia article. I have deleted it. Obviously a new article should be written without illegally copying other sources. —Kusma (t·c) 20:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reboot
Talk:Aji Chay

message: Please, if you want to move to other titles, please follow the guidelines. Xashaiar (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you doing exactly? Do you ever read wikipedia policy? WP:MOVE? Moreover why do you falsify google? According to searches Aji Chay is less common than Talkhe Rud. You can not use google just by searching "Aji chay" because this name is not "exclusively" for the river. Also a map is not a source: WP:Primary source, WP:OR. Xashaiar (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to google search Aji Chai is more common than Talkheh Rud.--Microinjection (talk) 02:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You first have to decide what/how to search, 1. you have to search rivers so that Aji Chay is less common than Talkhe Rud. 2. you search gives 100s of sites like cheap travel, .... 3. One should search scholarly works so that again talkheh rud is a bit more common than Aji Chay. Xashaiar (talk) 02:32, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: First: Well of course I haven't checked whole of the search results for your search as well as results from your search. Second Chay or Rud is the translation of the river so normally people are not using Aji Chay River, or Talkhe Rud River. They simply call it Aji Chay or Talkheh Rud.--Microinjection (talk) 04:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  move should be done properly 

message: The name Komur comes from the map, NJ 38-7 Tabriz, Iran; Azerbaijan; Armenia Iran, Series 1501, Joint Operations Graphic (Air) 1:250,000, U.S. National Imagery and Mapping Agency.  It enters the Aji Chay just north of Tabriz, and just before the Sian Chay enters the Aji Chay. It is also listed in the Geonames database here. --Bejnar (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Quri is not the Komur, the Quri comes in on the left and the Komur comes in on the right. --Bejnar (talk) 19:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Komur river
Talk:Jonathan Haidt

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to Human Intelligence 

message: Nice catches  Like how you stuck a fork in it (diff). It's done (for now). - Thanks; LeoRomero (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you Neptune's Trident for recent edits to Jon's page 

message: This is clearly an instance of snark intended to denigrate a critic, rather than a defensible description of their qualifications, since Sam Harris has indeed received a doctorate in Cognitive Neuroscience from UCLA, producing original research relevant to the question of "how moral reasoning works." 
This is meaningful, since he has expert knowledge in a field directly relevant to the questions which provoke Jonathan Haidt's analyses; they happen to differ in their conclusions about the impact of religious belief on the conduct of moral actors in society.
Both have their points.
thanks, bonze - bonze blayk (talk) 23:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you bonze blayk. I made a couple of edits with the goal of a neutral point of view (diff).   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 04:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justification needed for scare quotes re: "Neuroscientist" Sam Harris
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Touch Of Light

message: Support: I think he may be good with Wikipedia because he/she wants to get involved and make Wikipedia a better place. Goodshoepd35110s 03:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See Touch Of Light's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 04:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request

message: User:Touch_Of_Light
      run at Mon Oct 15 04:12:59 2007 GMT
Mainspace	167
Talk:	2
User talk:	427
User:	49
Wikipedia:	18
avg edits per page	1.36
earliest	17:25, 11 November 2006
number of unique pages	486
total	663
2006/11 	13 	
2006/12 	0 	
2007/1 	3 	
2007/2 	22 	
2007/3 	0 	
2007/4 	0 	
2007/5 	2 	
2007/6 	0 	
2007/7 	0 	
2007/8 	0 	
2007/9 	449 	
2007/10 	174 	
Mainspace
13	RuneScape
9	Apple pie
6	Longest word in English
6	Organization XIII
6	Sedona, Arizona
3	Actinides in the environment
3	Uncle Sam
2	Hydroponics
2	The Game
2	Sir Winston Churchill Secondary School (Vancouver)
2	Football pitch
2	Pace (unit of length)
2	Ringed Seal
2	People from Newton, Massachusetts
2	Mary Rose
User:
36	Touch Of Light
3	Me"tis people of the Pacific Islands
2	AmiDaniel/VP/Approval
2	TD Tigers
User talk:
27	Touch Of Light
5	72.177.17.115
4	71.141.104.26
3	71.109.59.70
3	190.74.149.177
3	69.205.130.243
3	Mossey4657
3	149.84.48.108
3	204.210.150.191
2	72.39.82.243
2	207.14.235.210
2	151.118.179.51
2	216.184.125.191
2	74.12.77.252
2	210.8.213.138
Wikipedia:
13	Administrator intervention against vandalism
2	Requests for adminship/Touch Of Light
from . WODUP 04:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Count
Talk:Bear Creek Lake State Park

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070803174701/http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/state_parks/bea.shtml. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Adelsverein

message: I have reinstated the Wikisource template removed from this article. The template was originally labeled "Otfried Hans Freiherr von Meusebach", who is John O. Meusebach the Second Commissioner-General of Adelsverein. The Wikisource template links to Meusebach's legal testimony about the Adelsverein and its immigration efforts in Texas.  Please do not delete this Wikisource template from this article.  It is directly related to the subject matter.  Thank you. — Maile  (talk) 16:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Wikisource template from Adelsverein article
Category talk:Biological databases

message: This Category:Bioinformatics databases should be renamed to Biological database(s). These are data collections from biologists and for biologists, not from/for bioinformaticians.  The primary article for this category is Biological database.  Dongilbert 04:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:CFD]]

message: Gene Banks are biological materials repositories, e.g. for plant seeds.  These are not Bioinformatics databases, though of course they use computers and store data on their seeds.
--Dongilbert (talk) 23:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I just made a category for things like gene banks.  I named the :Category:Biorepositories.  I put Biologicial databases as a member of it, because even though the word is "biorepository" I think the intent is "biological information repository", and the animals/plants/specimens are just the media for storing that information.  In the same way, the database is storing the information. I feel like the concept of biological databases and biorepositories ought to be linked somehow, and it seemed better to put databases into the biorepository category than vice-versa.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gene Banks is not a Bioinformatics database subcategory 

message: Hi, i would like to create a sub-category 'Biochemistry databases' to clean up the Biological databases category a little by sorting the databases for biomolecules there, cheers, --Ghilt (talk) 10:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Create Sub-Category 'Biochemistry databases'
Talk:Kishwaukee College

message: I think we should add that KC earned Arrowhead Conference Cup September 27, 2010.  http://www.njcaa.org/colleges_college_home.cfm?collegeId=1302  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shygirl175517 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports  

message: It needs to talk more about how the foundation of the college was created.
It also needs to give more information on how the building was established and first created.
(talk) 18:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History  

message: Transcribing the alumni from the category if there are proper citations would be an improvement over pointing readers to the categoty. Several baseball players are alumni? FloridaArmy (talk) 02:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni
Talk:Provost (education)

message: I think we should remove this line from the article on Provost (education). This article is more narrowly focused because of the Disambiguation of the word Provost.
It doesn't make sense that it would have to mentioned in an article about the job Provost and why it's related to education.
"It is also the title of the Dean of certain cathedrals within the Church of England (such as Southwark Cathedral)."
I hope you agree. Edit it if you do...
--24.63.79.69 04:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: May I suggest that the author of this page looks at some of the references to a provost at Eton College, as they might confuse readers? In one place the provost is the chair of governors; in another, the provost is referred to as the head. 197.232.84.164 (talk) 05:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Eton
Talk:ORP Gryf (1957)

message: I've found a blog post which gives her yard number of 677 and details of repairs following the sabotage in 1944. Although not an entirely RS, can we invoke WP:IAR and use the source here? Mjroots (talk)
This blog post gives a date of launch of 6 January 1944. Mjroots (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Blog sources

message: There seem to be a couple of gaps in coverage, on a quick skim-through:
*The construction and first appearance are a bit detatched. I'm presuming she never left Copenhagen in 1944 before being sabotaged; did anything happen - beyond sitting at a dock being worked on - between then and May 1945? She did manage to get to Lubeck, at least, but it's not clear if there was ever a "real" voyage with cargo.
**Apparently the ship was refloated and towed to Lübeck where repairs were carried out by Lübecker Flenderwerke (1st blog source above). Mjroots (talk)
*What was she? We note she was "rebuilt as a training ship and hospital ship", but it's not clear what she was originally built as or used as - a freighter, I assume, but it's not said anywhere. Likewise, what did she do in the Soviet navy?
**Built as a cargo ship - this in in the infobox. I believe she was a Soviet merchant ship rather than serving in the Soviet Navy (will tweak article to make it clearer that she was built as a cargo ship). Mjroots (talk)
*Finally, what happened to her? The lead says she's still at Gdynia as a barge; the article says an accomodation hulk at an unspecified port. Shimgray | talk | 12:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully that will answer your questions. Mjroots (talk) 04:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good! Shimgray | talk | 11:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it will look better once the questions I posed above re the blog source get answered. Mjroots (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Coverage

message: I wish the article had more content, but I guess there is not much out there. I am still uneasy as far as the b2 ("Coverage and accuracy") and b5 ("Supporting materials") criteria go, but I guess for a B-class, this can be seen as satisfactory. For a GA, more content would have to be added. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B class
Talk:Nechtan (mythology)

message: I skipped the doubt-template from 2009, as this refers to a genuine hypothesis by Georges Dumézil. The disputed second part 'close relative of the water' seems to me bare nonse, as the root *nepos- is not attested in the relevant Dictionaries, so I skipped it. Probably the author was referring to *nemb-. Sie the article on Neptune Otto S. Knottnerus (talk) 15:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Vedic God

message: Where it says "his inhabited" should it be "his (cult) inhabited" or "he" inhabited?67.8.232.45 (talk) 13:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar question

message: The article currently contains the sentence "This is wrong and the link between this site is a Victorian invention." Aside from having poor grammar, the sentence seems inappropriate, but I'm not sure whether to remove it - is it a valid complaint? Can someone fix this, please? Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visible editorial comment in article
Talk:Liath Macha and Dub Sainglend

message: Um....the sequence of events doesn't seem to make sense. As I read it, the grey horse is killed, but somehow goes on to vainly attempt to protect his master. ??? The only way this makes sense as written is if he bled to death slowly, but even so, some clarification is definitely in order.  ( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.245.220.154 (talk) 04:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused
Talk:Aung San Oo

message: Reason article should not be deleted: ASO is a Public figure: he is the brother of Aung San Suu Kyi, a person with a world-wide reputation, and is being used by Burma's military rulers in their campaign to discredit her. He has been featured in news media of note (TIME, the Economist), and is a well-known figure in Burmese poiltics. PiCo 00:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am happy to believe that that is so, and I suspect that far less notable people from USA/UK have articles, but the article must demonstrate why he is noteworthy, and at present it does not. Having a dispute in the courts over an inheritance is not noteworthy (although the dispute might be worth mentioning on ASSK's article), not following the political thought of one's father is not noteworthy, and being a supporter of an unpopular government is not noteworthy.  Neither article cited makes any claim for his noteworthiness in his own right, beyond that he is an engineer living in San Diego. Kevin McE 08:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still no claim of noteworthiness on this page. Believing him to be a public figure with a world wide reputation means nothing in encyclopaedic terms if it is not verified.   Kevin McE 20:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ascribing the man a "world-wide erputation" would be a stretch even for me :). But he does have a reputation within the circles that take an interest in Burmese politics - the politics that keeps on going when the camera crews have all left. He gets mentioned in Irrawaddy, for example - the Burmese diaspora's answer to the New York Times - and we have the cites in the article to prove it. PiCo 06:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Buile Shuibhne

message: The plot section seems to have two variant deaths-by-spear for Shuibhne... it would be great if an editor with more knowledge of which is told in which primary source could add that info! ‑‑mjgilsonT 17:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate deaths? 

message: Hi
Is this actually a poem? No where in the article does it state that, just that it is "an old Irish tale", and "The poetry in the story of Suibhne"
Can someone explain how this is written? THe English translation I have seen has a paragraph or two of text, then poetry stanzas, then more text, then another poem ... Chaosdruid (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem
Talk:Griffith Review

message: We are posting a first draft to include Griffith REVIEW (a major Australian journal) on the Wikipedia. We will review the Wikipedia guidelines and invite material from other objective parties. 
We respect Wikipedia's integrity and we'll endevour to post an entry that meets the objectivity requirements.
We are a small organisation and we respectfully request a period of 6 weeks to submit our revisions.
Best Wishes,
Griffith REVIEW 
Griffithreview 04:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two issues. First, per our  username policy, group accounts created to promote an organization or company are prohibited, and may lead to an account being blocked from editing. Second, many here strongly frown upon  creating or editing an article about a topic to which you have any relations or ties. The reason for this is that Wikipedia articles must be written from a  neutral point of view, and be free from any personal or corporate bias. I've left a note explaining this in more detail on your talk page. Best, --Bfigura (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Thank you :) I recoded the reference you added so that it would display properly (which does have the unfortunate side effect of making the source code less human readable). Basically, the cite template goes inside of the ref tags, then you use  to generate the bibliography automatically. Cheers, --Bfigura (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Kong Yick Building

message: This appears to come, legitimately, from the Wing Luke Museum, but it doesn't cite any sources. In particular is "Goon Dop" really correct? I'm pretty sure his name was "Goon Dip". - Jmabel | Talk 04:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, "Goon Dip", and I have a citation from that very museum. - Jmabel | Talk 05:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Copernicus Leslie Qwark

message: His name is listed as Copernicus L. Qwark on this poster promoting Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction: http://www.us.playstation.com/ratchetandclank/assets/images/extras/poster/RCF_MoviePoster.pdf - would someone add this with the reference as I'm unsure how to do so. Iwantanimac 04:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this article be named what he is called most of the time? For instance, the Spider-Man article isn't named "Peter Benjamin Parker". --Jopasopa (talk) 21:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Irish annals

message: The Rule of St. Clare) 
MS D i 3 
MS D ii 1 
(Leabhar Ua Maine) 
MS D ii 3 
(The Stowe Missal & Bookshrine) 
MS D iii 1 
MS 23 E 25 
(Leabhar na hUidhre) 
MS 23 E 29 
(The Book of Fermoy) 
MS 23 F 13 
MS 23 F 16 
(The Book of O'Gara) 
MS 23 H 19 
MS 23 L 33 
MS 23 O 23 
MS 23 O 48 (a) 
(Liber Flavus Fergusiorum: Part I) 
MS 23 O 48 (b) 
(Liber Flavus Fergusiorum: Part II) 
MS 23 P 2 
(The Book of Lecan) 
MS 23 P 3 
MS 23 P 6 
(The Annals of the Four Masters) 
MS 23 P 7 
(The Annals of the Four Masters) 
MS 23 P 10 (i) 
MS 23 P 10 (ii) 
MS 23 P 10 (iii) 
MS 23 P 12 
(The Book of Ballymote) 
MS 23 P 16 
(An Leabhar Breac) 
MS 23 P 24 
MS 24 P 1 
MS 24 P 8 
MS 24 P 25 
(Leabhar Chlainne Suibhne) 
MS 24 P 26 
MS 24 P 33 
(Leabhar Chlainne Aodha Buidhe) 
MS 23 Q 6 
MS 23 Q 10 
MS 24 Q 23 
(The Domhnach Airgid)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fergananim (talk • contribs) 16:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other manuscripts

message: hi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.201.45 (talk) 23:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: