lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Libri of Aleister Crowley

message: The list indicates which classes each work belongs to, but doesn't indicate what the classes mean (not sure if this is explained anywhere else; if it is then there should at least be a link to that explanation. -zorblek (talk) 13:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classes? 

message: The description for Liber 777 simply says "its correspondences". Could someone more knowledgeable than me add to it please? 209.193.46.5 (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liber 777
Talk:Mary Malcolmson

message: Is it really called a company in Canada, not a troop?Rlevse 02:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was at that time. If you look at the original registration certificate (here), you can see this was the standard description. Nowadays, I think they use the word unit instead. I don't know when the change was. The same is true of the UK. Kingbird 03:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Company
Talk:Miguel Malvar

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The following sentence that appears in the Philippine Revolution section needs to be cleaned up:
* After the Spanish-American War broke out in 1898, and Admiral George Dewey requested the aid of Aguinaldo and his revolutionaries to help in the Philippine Campaign, and soon the revolution had started all over again.
I'd do it myself, but I'm not sure what the statement is trying to say.  We also need a source documenting Dewey's request for aid from Aguinaldo and his revolutionaries.  If someone more knowledgeable in this area can make some improvements on this, that would be great. Kabesang Tales (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippine Revolution 
Talk:Karous

message: I'd like to know where the romanization "Karous" came from. The katakana clearly reads Karasu. I understand that it kinda reads Karous (with an English accent) but I still find it rather surprising. 電波の世界 (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It comes from nowhere, Milestone just thought it was funny. Serious. Their titles are all strange, except for Chaos Field. (edit: I heard it was an attempt to make "karasu" a "plural" word somehow. Clearly a play on English conventions.) Despatche (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Karous???

message: We're going to need to mention this, but I can't say how. I'm looking forward to this anyway. Despatche (talk) 21:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Karous 3DS
Category talk:Non-free images that should be in SVG format

message: Im going to recommend this category page be put forward for deletion in 72 hours. This is because it is a contradiction in itself. It is against fairuse image policy to redraw an image at a higher resolution than it was originally provided at. Making an image into a scalable vector format is obviously strictly in breach of this. It is especially true of logos of which about 60-90% of the following are, in one form or another. I believe this category has come about from slightly over enthusiastic tagging of images with SVG flags. I have just had to clean out the main category of 33 out of a total of 209 files because they are logos which would breach copyright if made into SVG! Thats almost 15% of the category which would breach copyright laws, this category is even worse. We need to be precisely careful with logo images as we certainly don't want the foundation to get in legal trouble. I will seek consensus on the matter over the next few days, if there is no reply or if consensus favours category detaging and page deletion then i shall go ahead with it via AfD and use AWB to detag pages. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 18:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It'a alot later then 72 hours from July 13... 68.39.174.238 01:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Discussion on another page is ongoing at this time. The problem with copyright laws with regards to this sort of thing is that they are very clear in some areas and very unclear in others, such as what exactly constitutes a low resolution, for example 4 years ago 300 x 300 was pretty big back when most PC's displayed 640x480 graphics, now its tiny, for example my laptop is using 1440 x 900, only just under twice as large a resoltuion. Until such a time (if it ever happens) that we are clear on copyright it is probably best that this remain, as we may be legitimately able to redraw logos etc. as SVGs. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 11:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Can I vectorize a logo or image myself and use it on corresponding article. For example, I vectorized this file and used its vector version in corresponding article. Is it okay? I mean can I vectorize any non-free logo/image and use it on Wikipedia? If there is any problem, I'll stop vectorizing raster images because this sentence is worrying me: "Please do not re-draw or auto-trace official logos, but instead seek out vector versions from official sources to be converted to SVG." at this page. --Asadwarraich (talk) 09:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: SVG
Talk:Yaneer Bar-Yam

message: It is unclear whether the sentence-fragment "After a junior faculty appointment..." belongs to the preceding sentence or to the following sentence. --Hordaland (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear 

message: --- added 29jul2010.  He does seem to be a bright guy with some good publcations, but NECSI is not a major academic institution.  It's more of a private project.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.25.140.214 (talk) 18:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  NECSI is not a major institution, it is an association created by Bar-Yam himself who appointed himself and then created connections to major institutions based on friendship rather than academic merit. Bar-Yam is the master of opportunism, at creating his 'institute' and publishing on every opportunistic topic almost as soon as tabloids report but with an apparent academic style from very little supporting evidence and their papers make very little impact rather than the buzz (translated in a bunch of citations) they attract from being so opportunistic. Science should not be done in this way. 199.71.233.34 (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: This article was tagged as self-published as of Sept 2012.  Numerous additional verified third-party sources were added, tags removed as of Oct 2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecinimod (talk • contribs) 19:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-Published Sources
Talk:Niels G. Stolt-Nielsen

message: Since the change of the section about the criminal charges has been radically changed, I just want to put up a reminder here that this should be investigated further to ascertain how the Wikipedia article should cover this topic. __meco 10:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court case information needs to be reviewed 

message: An IP user tagged this article for speedy deletion with the rationale that it is spam. Obviously this is not the case, and the anon user may have misunderstood the criteria for applying such a template since the edit summary reads: Nom. for delete: the only references are the company's own web site and a blog. If said person wants to nominate on those grounds, a regular AfD is the appropriate procedure. __meco (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Hangon for speedy nom
Talk:Jedwabne

message: "polish christians subjected the innocent jews to all sorts of tortures and humiliations like ripping the foetus from pregnant jewish women" ... "one jew had his eyes gouged out and tongue cut off and left to die for 12hours" ... "This was the legacy that the so called 'friendly polish christian' community did to the jews of jedwabne.May the perpetrators burn in hell for all eternity, and may the poor jews live forever in peace in the garden of eden. amen"
:))) years pass, but good old Wikipedia still stands up to its unrivaled editorial standards 93.97.12.228 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 19:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The NKVD had secret informants but the police had uniformed staff, monumental buildings and an army.Xx236 (talk) 06:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NKVD wasn't ''secret''
Talk:Academy@Worden

message: Heads - I have reverted headmaster Moffatt's finishing date to unknown as 1973 is too early.  I have in my possession a signature of his in a book dated 1976 when still in office.  Maybe an enquiry to the school is in order.
Houses - Farington house sticks in my mind. What period were the local River houses?
Oxonhutch 18:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heads and houses

message: There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Worden_High_School:_Headteachers regarding whether this article contains incorrect dates.  Please check it out.
For now, I've removed the disputed dates, and installed "citation needed" tags for the other dates.  Just because something is true doesn't mean that it can be included in Wikipidia.  Wikipedia has a policy about verifiability that requires reliable sources to be used for all information in this online encyclopedia.  Thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 16:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect dates?
Talk:Tykocin

message: Damn, that's some smog! Is this a recurring issue in the area?? Synotia (talk) 09:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It visually looks like smog but my brain tells me now that it's probably mist lol Synotia (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure it's a mist. Air pollution in this region is very low so i have never seen there any smog. Air Quality in Tykocin. Another important info is about location of the city on the river bank inside among wet meadows. Krzysztof Popławski(talk) 11:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the picture in the infobox
Talk:Sztum

message: "in the East Prussian plebiscite on 11 July 1920, 19,984 votes were given to remain in Germany, 4,904 votes for Poland." - while this is true (though it should be sourced), without the proper context about the plebiscite and the conditions under which it took place, it can be misleading. I've tried to add that. The other way to go would simply be to remove the info. Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The plebiscite results are simple facts, the reason why the voters decided the way they did is POV and of course a matter of "national" background. The reader might read more about the different views at East Prussian plebiscite, there's no need to create a POVfork at every town in the plebiscite area. HerkusMonte (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the East Prussian plebiscite artice could use some serious NPOVing now that I look at it. And while we don't want to POV fork, we cannot just present "simple facts" (is there ever really such a thing?) torn out of context - that's actually what POV is in fact. That Saddam Hussein was elected by 99% of the voters is a "simple fact". Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You want to compare a plebiscite supervised by the League of Nations with British, French and Italian troops stationed in the area with Saddam's elections? Mmh, I don't see any comparability. However, the town's article is not the place to go into detail about the plebiscite background. HerkusMonte (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The comparison is exaggerated to be sure, but it's a matter of degree. I agree that the town's article is not the place to go into detail. But that doesn't mean we can just present stuff without any kind of context what so ever. Volunteer Marek (talk) 20:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  plebiscite 
Talk:Abaucán River

message: I took the current page and beat it against the French Wikipedia original. I think I got it right. I tried to iron out the Franglish and fix little things like dots for commas (and vice-versa) in numbers. One problem at least remains--the link for "salar" sends you somewhere irrelevant, and there is no Wikidict entry for the term, which, as it turns out, lives a marginal existence in geophysical jargon and means something like "salt flat." I'm new at this, so I don't know how to file the serial numbers off the web entry I found and include it in the dictionary. I hope somebody else will do that and fix the link. Milkbreath 20:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Phantasy Star Universe: Ambition of the Illuminus

message: I see no reason to merge them. The articles should not be merged, because both of them are complete episodes and stand alone installments.(LonerXL (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge???

message: Agreed, I'll see about getting some of the confirmed information over here. Even system requirements would be an improvement with whats here.
Anyone know who did the remix of the opening?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.103.80 (talk) 08:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This entire page is in desperate need of a rewrite.

message: Under new areas it mentions that the Forest, Caves, Mines & Ruins (levels of the original Phantasy Star Online) are playable in Phantasy Star Universe: Ambition of the Illuminous. I've found this to be untrue, except for limited time special event missions online such as Maximum Attack. And even then all four areas are considerably shortened and combined into one area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.124.190 (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSO areas not playable. 

message: Well doesent anyone think the psu aoti article should be updated its been years sence it was updated  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dallasdaddi (talk • contribs) 15:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phantasy Star Universe ^^
Talk:Slope One

message: Given several others below had the same reaction as I did, I decided to remove the image, and change the n2 references. The discussion on algorithmic complexity is almost certainly wrong. Chebuctonian (talk) 03:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy article 

message: Hence, given n items, to implement Slope One, all that is needed is to compute and store the average differences and the number of common ratings for each of the n2 pairs of items.
Is it more accurate to say it's actually n(n-1)/2 pairs (might still say it's o(n2) though)?
We don't need to store (itemi,itemi) and (itemi,itemj) = - (itemj,itemi).
Is that correct?
Sounds correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.15.142 (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slope one collaborative filtering for rated resources 

message: Updating the database when a user has already entered x ratings, and enters a new one, requires x time steps.
I don't understand why it's x time steps.
Adding a rating to one item, we need to update the difference average for every pair this item is part of.
So with m users and n items, would it be more like m(n-1) operations?
Could you explain why the number of ratings for a given user matters to calculate the average differences of an item?
Answer: If a user didn't rate both i and j, then it contributes nothing to the prediction of ratings on item i from ratings on item j (or to the prediction of ratings on item j from ratings on item i). Hence, suppose that a user has a single rating entered for item i, and he rates something more, say item j, for a total of two rated items, then it contributes only to the prediction of item i from item j (or vice versa). If he rates a third item, say item k, then there is a contribution to the prediction of item j from item k (and vice versa) and to the prediction of item i from item k (and vice versa) and so on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.15.142 (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithmic Complexity of Slope One 

message: Okay, what the hell? This doesn't even add up: (4-3+2(2-3))/(1+2) = -1/3 not 0. And item 1 is rated more on average than item 2... --Tgr 02:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It still doen't make sense, and it has been implemented. I wish I knew what was going on. I have same problem you said, doesn't even add up! --FeralOink (talk) 07:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image totally wrong
File talk:SingaporeStone-bwphoto.jpg

message: The image is not replaceable. The Singapore Stone is displayed at the National Museum of Singapore. For preservation reasons, it is unlikely that visitors to the museum will be permitted to take photographs of it. Therefore, it is also unlikely that an image which does not rely on the doctrine of fair use is easily obtainable.
*The museum allows non-flash photography (their restriction on non commercial use is laughable, since if I take a picture of a PD object I can do with it as I like). Using a propery sensitive camera and the right film, good photos still may be taken. Therefore this image is replaceable if someone wanted to take the time to try to take a good picture at the museum. -N 21:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free fair use justification
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Philippe

message: User:Philippe
      run at Fri Jul 13 19:47:38 2007 GMT
Category talk:	1
Category:	5
Image:	2
Mainspace	2661
MediaWiki talk:	2
Talk:	50
Template:	5
User talk:	2567
User:	117
Wikipedia talk:	21
Wikipedia:	496
avg edits per page	1.20
earliest	20:57, 28 May 2006
number of unique pages	4948
total	5927
2006/5 	2 	
2006/6 	0 	
2006/7 	0 	
2006/8 	0 	
2006/9 	0 	
2006/10 	0 	
2006/11 	4 	
2006/12 	97 	
2007/1 	494 	
2007/2 	1632 	
2007/3 	1053 	
2007/4 	715 	
2007/5 	1386 	
2007/6 	489 	
2007/7 	55 
Philippe's editcount summary stats as of 19:47, July 13th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 19:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hand of Hope

message: The article states that the fact that the baby reached out of the womb implies the existence of life.
In fact life itself is absolutely certain to be there, the only debatable subject should be whether or not it may be considered human.
Edit needed IMHO.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.254.73.103 (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signs of life?  

message: Painfully NPOV, but probably not worth editing.  Is this article really necessary?  Seems like it could be merged with something else, like the entry for the medical procedure.
71.197.252.169 19:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugh 

message: Why is this in the urban legend category?
(Also, how can anti-abortion people use this for their propaganda when he was a 21-week old fetus and abortions aren't done at that stage?) – Alensha talk 12:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban legend 

message: in january 2012, we have a similar image, this time most definitely a newborn grasping the hand of a doctor.99.23.80.136 (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Related image
Talk:Schreger line

message: I made a few edits to the article. I'm new to the whole wikipedia game, but i've noticed that Schreger line has basically the same wording as Elephant_and_mammoth_ivory. What should be done? Should something be done?
Dancanm 19:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hm... 

message: I came to this page looking for the difference of the Schreger lines/angles between African and Asian elephants. It would be good to have this here. Maybe an expert could help out? BroVic (talk) 11:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert information on this topic?
Template talk:User USask

message: Why is this userbox green and yellow when the Huskies are green and white (or is it silver)? BigNate37(T) 19:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I didn't design if after the Huskies, I followed the school colours (green and black) and colours in the logo (green, yellow and black).--Victor D PARLE 22:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colours
Template talk:Non-free use rationale logo

message: Change:
 |Low_resolution=
to
 |Low_resolution=
This is done so  is added to all pages that should be using it (i.e. the SVGs) but aren't. Thanks! Jonteemil (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks :)Jonteemil (talk) 03:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 3 April 2020 

message: Change "This is a logo for..." to "This is the logo for..." in the file summary.
because it is more understandly. Rodney Araujo  Tell me - My contributions  15:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , and thank you! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 20:47, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 14 October 2020 

message: New logo Athletic1998 (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 9 November 2022 

message: I've used this template in about 500 files lately. I always wrote the "Use=Infobox" parameter there, but only now I realized that I was making a mistake: The "Use=Infobox" parameter cannot be used for sports competition logos. What now? Should I rewrite it all to "Use=Other" and add the "Purpose" parameter with several detailed sentences? ... It would be great if we could add another option for the "Use" parameter: "Use=Sport" or "Use=Competition" or something similar. Maiō T. (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you Salavat, the "Use" parameter can be used with value "Event". Now we should revise the opening sentence of "Purpose", especially those words about the "top of the article", because many articles contain two logos but neither is at the top of the article, for example see this. Maiō T. (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage in sports competition files
Talk:General Aircraft Monospar ST-25

message: Did the ST-25 have a single or twin-tail? Or was the mark produced in two versions? Drutt (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The variants section has the answer. MilborneOne (talk) 20:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you are right G-AEDY was the De Luxe then the first Universal. MilborneOne (talk) 21:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Category talk:Commercial video games with freely available source code

message: :'Open Source Games' might be a better name for this category.  Jgbaxter 20:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is appropriate. The source code of certain games has limitions that would make it incompatible with the Open Source Initiative. For example, the Doom source code cannot be legally used in a commercial product without consent from id Software. True open source games would not have this restriction. --Ixfd64 (talk) 06:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that the two categories represent different things, but Doom is under the GPL so you can use it commercially if you wish, it just has to be re-released under the GPL. I just wanted to point that out. Technopeasant (talk) 22:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Category name
Talk:Krasnaya Polyana, Sochi, Krasnodar Krai

message: It seems that a major historical element is missing from the history of Krasnaya Polyana, in the massacre of 1864 (there or nearby) and ethnic cleansing of Circassians dating from the June 1864 decision, from the battle at Krasnaya Polyana. 
I'm not familiar enough to make the edits.  I hope someone can. Cossaxx (talk) 08:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1864 massacre and ethnic cleansing 