lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of College Football Hall of Fame inductees (coaches)

message: I'm sure this article will be filled out in due time. Lancer Sykera 00:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: In process

message: I would love it anyone out there could wikify even one entry on this rather long list.  I don't want to give any intructions, since that's not really in the spirit of the project, but here are a couple things to think about before you edit.
*The schools are named the way they are for a reason.  Particularly, I've used a minimum of abreviations, since there are so many that can stand for multiple schools.  For instance, both South Carolina and Southern California are called USC.  Also, if you change one Texas Christian to a TCU without changing them all, that makes the list inconsistent.
*If you wikify somebody's name, check to see that it's linking to the proper man, and not some other personality with the same name.  If an article exists for a John Doe but not the one you're looking for, link it to John Doe (football) even if that link is dead.  With any luck someone will be encouraged to write the article we need.
I'll get off my soapbox now. Thanks for the help. --djrobgordon 00:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify

message: Any thoughts on turning this into a table for better readability? Also, what about a separate page that lists coaches sorted by school or by HOF class year? PSUMark2006 17:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting suggestions 

message: I have added the field CollegeHOFID to . In that field should be the ID from the CFB HOF website. Please try to add this field to all the coaches in this article. Some don't even have an infobox yet so that needs to be rectified as well.--NMajdan•talk 14:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New field in infobox

message: Would it be worth it to create a template that would take the CFBHOF web site ID and create a link to the appropriate bio without having to duplicate the URL multiple times? For example, perhaps  could create 1989. Thoughts? — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 04:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template?
Category talk:Godzilla films

message: It seems that many of the articles categorized here are only done so to make reference to the main Godzilla "hub" . . . for instance, King Ghidorah and Oxygen Destroyer. If no one immediately objects, i'm going to eliminate the "Category" appendage for most of the non-films here, so if you notice one removed that you feel shouldn't be, just fix it and please let me know why! --Crazilla 00:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Felix Werder

message: If FW is dead, then could you add the date and place? and if he is not, could you revise the tenses accordingly? Thanks.Staffelde 00:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the cite.  It mentions Vera, and the composer's wife name was Vera, so it's undoubtedly him.  The funeral is happening today 4 May, which again proves he must have died a couple of days ago.  --  ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ [your turn] 22:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead?

message: There's a death notice in today's The Age (4 May 2012), for a "Felix Werder".  Someone has edited the article to show him dying on 4 May, but it must have happened on 3 May at the very latest for it to get into today's paper.  That's if it is in fact the same Felix Werder.  --  ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ [your turn] 22:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the cite.  It mentions Vera, and the composer's wife name was Vera, so it's undoubtedly him.  The funeral is happening today 4 May, which again proves he must have died a couple of days ago.  --  ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ [your turn] 22:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead redux
Talk:Chris Ward (chess player)

message: I removed the reference to the website on the Dragon Variation because I couldn't find it.  If anyone knows where it is, please put the reference back in with a link.  Thanks.  Sim man 00:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: removed website
Talk:Black Cherry (Goldfrapp album)

message: Does anyone know of any other chart positions for the album other than in the UK and USA??? Underneath-it-All 00:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Positions??? 
Talk:Altar Linens

message: Should the title be Altar Linens or Altar linens? Paul 18:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Any reason this page and Altar cloth shouldn't be merged? The Editrix 15:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It's been almost a month since the merge was proposed, and no one objected on either article's talk page. We do need sources badly for both sides, however. -- nae'blis (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Altar cloth?
Talk:Edenbridge (band)

message: They are powe metal and have they neo-classical metal in there to. They are just not Symphoinc metal. 
Also why would any one delete the bands that are simialr to them. Visions of Atalntis and Nightwish are simialr to them. So is Lunatica please leave it alone. Turemetalfan Dec 14 2005 9:05
:There is no way of listing "similar bands" without falling into POV problems. You will notice that this section has long been phased out from band articles. --Sn0wflake 23:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  They are more then just a Symphoinc metal band 
Wikipedia talk:Contents/Lists

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Complete list of encyclopedia topics. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete list of encyclopedia topics until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Was closed as "keep" on 31 January 2021. - dcljr (talk) 01:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Complete list of encyclopedia topics" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I suggest that wikipedia makes a group chat so people can communicate easly 41.115.120.24 (talk) 23:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps WP:IRC is what you're looking for? - dcljr (talk) 01:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catering and decor 

message: I've been working on a template to standardize the appearance of the all list subpages while making them easier to edit going forwards and more accessible by using standard HTML list elements. The template works by simply passing a nested wikitext list as the first parameter, and it handles all the special formatting. So for example,

would produce
The template is available at User:BrandonXLF/Template:Contents topic list.
Before converting the lists to use the template, there were a few design choices I had to make. First, bolded items are separated by their list by a ":" and I added a hanging indent. I converted a few pages for demo at User:BrandonXLF/Wikipedia:Contents/Lists. Please let me know if you have any design suggestions. Thanks, – BrandonXLF (talk) 03:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardized template
Talk:Orcon Limited

message: Editors who may have a conflict of interest are not barred from participating in articles and discussion of articles where they have a conflict of interest, but must be careful when editing in mainspace.  Compliance with this guideline requires discussion of proposed edits on talk pages and avoiding controversial edits in mainspace.
This article has benefited from the lengthy edits of contributors who have not registered.
There may be many legitimate reasons for registering but, I would suggest, disguising a CoI is not one of them. Please read the behavioural guidelines outlined above and consider the advantages of registering and continuing to contribute. Thank you!  W. Frank talk ✉  12:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] 

message: Can someone get specific permission from Orcon to use their logo here on their article page?
Then we can replace this passage and make the article look a bit better:
 W. Frank talk ✉  13:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Company logo?

message: This article could do with a tidy-up IMO...
Near the start, Orcon is described as a State-owned company; 
A bit further down, we see that it has been sold (partially, or fully?) and has at least 48% private ownership.
What is the ownership structure at this stage? ... especially regarding the remaining 52%?
There should be a section on Criticism, in view of recent exposure on TV's Fair Go program regarding abysmal customer service and retaliatory blocking of incoming calls to a complainant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbarraud (talk • contribs) 06:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership status of company?
Talk:Scarface (1932 film)

message: The lede should be a summary of the entirety of the article. For instance, it should contain a basic summary of the plot. I'd recommend something more in the vicinity of three sentences than one. Missed the FA nom, but happy to read through if you're looking for reviewers in the future. (not watching, please ) czar 01:32, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't agree there, I'm afraid. IMO a single-sentence summary of the premise of the film is all that's required. Popcornduff (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Required, maybe, but it doesn't give the reader much to work with. Per WP:FILMLEDE, I'd at least expect some context on the co-stars' role in the premise, and context on why the depiction of the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre is important. There's plenty else to paraphrase in the lede for an article of this size, though. czar 02:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , I tried expanding the lead as you suggested. I would certainly love a review if you are interested. I still want to promote this to FA. Skyes(BYU) (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Also the lede goes into great detail on the censors, but makes no mention of production. The lede should be written to summarize the entirety of the article. Think of giving each sentence in the lede proportional weight to the length of the article. (Also, in general, feel free to revert any of my edits here. I'm just trying to find what is easiest for a general audience to read.) czar 02:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede 

message: * I'd first challenge you to reduce the number of headings. Is it possible to group the content in fewer headings that still effectively group the article's contents? For reference, you can compare against other film articles FAs here. 
** For example, is the content of "Related films" and "Italian language versions" not primarily a component of the film's "Legacy"? As a reader, I'd want to hear about the 1932 film's influence on Pacino in context of the 1983's production 
* Next steps could also include checking the refs to make sure they're the best possible source (at least one of the links was dead when I checked). Ideally, there would be definitive, secondary sources whenever possible. On same note, it's not necessary to source the plot, since if it's just descriptive, it's assumed to be verifiable in the film. However, it's nice to provide secondary sourcing such that a reader can look up details without watching the full film, or also to include analysis that you wouldn't be able to write through simple description. Not necessary, but if available, I recommend using secondary sourcing for the synopsis. czar 03:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: "Filming lasted six months, which was long for films made in the early 1930s."
"Filming took three months..."
"Despite that, Scarface was filmed and put together quickly."
2A02:AA1:101B:F002:89AB:6FD8:1109:1E62 (talk) 18:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Take your pick
Talk:Mediterranean cuisine

message: A user, , has added a UNESCO Cultural Heritage box to this article. Only thing is, the item concerns something confusingly named "Mediterranean Diet", which according to the linked rubric concerns " crops, harvesting, fishing, animal husbandry, conservation, processing, cooking, and particularly the sharing and consumption of food," Further "It includes the craftsmanship and production of traditional receptacles for the transport, preservation and consumption of food, including ceramic plates and glasses... Markets also play a key role..." The "cooking" of the food is mentioned as one item among the dozen or so aspects of this very widely-drawn cultural heritage entity. 
Editors have been quite clear over the years that Mediterranean diet as commonly understood is not to be equated with Mediterranean cuisine. The UNESCO listing is however defining "Mediterranean diet" in a much wider sense than either the "diet" (nutritional aspect) or the "cuisine" (culinary aspect), i.e. it does not match the scope of either article. I'll note in passing that Ferclopedio actually removed the UNESCO Cultural Heritage infobox from the "Mediterranean diet" article, where it was boldly headed by the title "Mediterranean diet", adding it here rather more, er, quietly, without that particular attribute, which might have, mmm, clashed slightly in its new context. In short, we surely agree that, in fact, it doesn't properly fit or belong here. 
Normally I'd just immediately remove anything that fitted the scope of an article so badly. However it has nowhere obvious to go. Thoughts? Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it clearly doesn't  belong here, so it should be removed. Why doesn't Ferclopedio create a new article to cover that very broad definition? His contributions list shows that he's been adding a lot of content to various articles, and he's created numerous stubs and at least one longer article  Wedding of King Alfonso XIII and Princess Victoria Eugenie of 10,859 bytes to start. Carlstak (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed the box and added a mention of the listing at the end of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

text:  Thanks but it is a gross mismatch all the same. I'll remove it now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mediterranean Diet" as "Cultural Heritage"
Talk:Sabrina Sato

message: At first I thought this was vandalism, but I then it was confirmed (shockingly) on youtube that she does belch in public and on video.  Could we get this information cleaned up, verified and properly sourced? CaptainMorgan (talk) 02:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Belching
Category talk:Alumni of the Queen's College, Oxford

message: I added all the former students listed in the article for college, with the exception of Georges Carpentier, since I wasn't sure if the George Carpentier who went to Queen's is indeed the boxing champion. Does anyone know? Pruneau
Shouldn't this page be renamed Former students of The Queen's College, Oxford? Pruneau 10:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a very late response. Alumni is the correct term. Bduke (talk) 23:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Iranian languages

message: I've nominated the two categories for Northeastern and Southeastern Iranian up for deletion: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 December 30#Northeastern and Southeastern Iranian. – Uanfala (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northeastern and Southeastern Iranian categories up for deletion 

message: Hi,
Could someone please annotate whether the Avestan entries in the comparison table correspond to Old Avestan, Younger Avestan, or both, or at the very least cite sources whence the material in the table was taken?  ’preciate it  —PowerPCG5 (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Iranian languages#Comparison table|Comparison table]] 

message: On the Indo-Aryan page, we have a clear, concise map of the different subsets of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Iranian languages; it is helpful to readers, it helps them get a general idea of the range of the Indo-Aryan languages, and it is generally beneficial. However, the map on this page is the exact opposite; subdivisions are not shown, only showing an approximate area where the Iranian languages are spoken in blue. The map is zoomed out to include the entire world, which is unhelpful for readers and only hinders their experience. Based off of this, should the current map be replaced with a more useful alternative? Praxeria (talk) 21:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the Map used 

message: The words that are marked as Luri language words, many of them are not used at all in any of the sub-branches of the Luri language, and those words that are Luri are not used in most of the Luri languages. 5.214.248.140 (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farsi words have been introduced instead of Lori words in the language comparison table.
Talk:John Farmer (composer)

message: title should probably be changed to John Farmer (c. 1570-c. 1601) to align with approx. birth and death dates--FeanorStar7 (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article
Talk:Metal for Muthas

message: I am removing "now a major metal label" from "Iron Maiden, who headlined the tour, became largely intertwined with the history of Sanctuary Records (whose namesake was the similarly named Iron Maiden track on the compilation), now a major metal label." because Sanctuary records is defunct since 2007 according to this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_Records FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanctuary is defunct
Talk:Choker

message: I was going to mention/ask/suggest that. It does not apply to this. I think an average person whom wears a choker (mostly females) isn't symbolizing bondage/BDSM, whatever. It could be erotic, but there can be other reasons why and it doesn't have to do with the collar thing. There isn't any sources backing this up that chokers have connections to BDSM on this page. If there is, please put it on another article. It is a kind of necklace, so let it be!!! There should not be anything else to say about it because it's illrelevant! Well it's my POV, but if there isn't more discussion, I will be happy to remove it. Steven312 17:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well, and more, the collar/choker distinction is only significant in the BDSM community - see Collar (jewelry). Remove away, Steven! PKM 18:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I removed the BDSM reference completly. Steven312 23:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I totally agree 

message: I posted this to the external links section.  says that it does not meet Wikipedia's quality standard for an external link for this topic.
*The History Of Chokers, a 10-minute video by Safiya Nygaard
I thought I would post here in case anyone wanted to explore more. The video description includes a list of sources which anyone might mine for content.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choker video 

message: The article clear shows it but almost in a unclear manner. 108.49.182.150 (talk) 03:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  BDSM
Talk:Dargaard

message: This piece might fit within the rock fans definition of Classical, but from what i've heard it certainly isn't, and perhaps the term orchestral folksong or something similar would be more appropriate.  If it genuinely fitted into the genre of Classical music, features such as leading notes would be apparent.  A good example of modal (as opposed to diatonic) harmony is in shown by this piece http://www.dargaard.com/bearer%20of%20the%20flame.mp3, in which every (or almost) dominant chord is minor, which clearly suggests the aeolian mode.  Classical music refers to either the diatonic western music from roughly 1700-1820 or is a blanket term for formal european art music (i.e. not regional folk music).  The most important factors in defining a work as classical in the broader sense are whether the composition follows some formal set of musical conventions established at the time, and whether it is notated for practice and performance.  I think folk music is probably a far more accurate term, and I mean this in an entirely uncondescending way.
:There is a little problem in the english wikipedia, because Neo-classical isn't Neoclassicism. Neo-classical is a new genre from the '80s, founded by music groups like In The Nursery and Dead Can Dance. It's more "freestyle classical", created by synthesizers and orchestral samples.
=== Characteristics of neoclassical (dark wave) genre ===
I am questioning the sentence at the beginning of this article, which reads The genre is often heavily debated, but is entirely made on keyboards. This is a pretty large claim. I am a big fan of neoclassical (dark wave) music, including Dargaard's, and am contributing to the neoclassical (dark wave) article on WP. To say that this music is entirely made on keyboards is not only inaccurate; it is simply wrong. Please consider either deleting this sentence or amending it. See the article on neoclassical (dark wave) for a better description of this genre. Thanks. Daniel Grünfeld (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am questioning the sentence at the beginning of this article, which reads The genre is often heavily debated, but is entirely made on keyboards. This is a pretty large claim. I am a big fan of neoclassical (dark wave) music, including Dargaard's, and am contributing to the neoclassical (dark wave) article on WP. To say that this music is entirely made on keyboards is not only inaccurate; it is simply wrong. Please consider either deleting this sentence or amending it. See the article on neoclassical (dark wave) for a better description of this genre. Thanks. Daniel Grünfeld (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristics of neoclassical (dark wave) genre
Talk:Chromosome 1

message: Some text in this article was taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/chromosome=1 (public domain) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wouterstomp (talk • contribs) 
I have added that source to the References list.  However, I think the references made to it are too explicit not to have in-text citations.  There are other references listed; they too do not have in-text citations.  How is this handled?  I was going to add a footnote (the Wikipedia citation system I am familiar with), but Wikipedia policy discourages mixing citation styles. - Slow Graffiti 21:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: How many genes are there?--88.104.132.1 (talk) 18:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of genes 

message: At the "Diseases and disorders" section, there is text "890 known diseases related to this chromosome". This number "890" was added by this edit in 2006. But source for this number is unclear. I think this kind of number should have source. As far as I know, OMIM would be good and useful candidate about genetic diseases and disorders. --Was a bee (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reminder 

message: Is it possible to add another sorting method? It would be nice to sort the genes by position on the chromosome beginning with 1p11 or 1q11.CaffeineWitcher (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  sort by gene position