Talk:Benghazi

message: NPOV: whole bottom section is hopeless. Can someone with the time and inclination write up an encyclopedic and referenced blurb about the disturbances? Thanks in advance. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 18:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Benghazi

message: I've rewritten much of the article and removed all the information about the AIDS trial which took up 90% of the old article. Jaw101ie 11:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article 

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WPCities

message: Pretty old Mediterranean cities like Benghazi dot the north coast landscape of the country. This city is the illustration of the principles was founded upon: closeness, unity, community, and family. The neighborhoods were compact and had mixed-uses. Everything a family needed in the normal course of the week was all within walking distance. There was a town square where the townspeople met and talked. In the youth of this country small developments like these were common,--Walid.omeir (talk) 10:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Urban Design pattern 

message: Over the last several weeks, I've rewritten a lot of this article. I've bumped up its quality rating to B-Class. Anybody have any comments?Jaw101ie (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Assessment

message: Daaang. :D
Jaw101ie, this is awesome. You've expanded this article immensely. I believe that your re-rating is justified.
There were a few things I noticed upon an initial check; based on the article's size, the lead should be three or four paragraphs long; also, there are a number of paragraphs throughout the article that really need citations (for example, the history section has a few paragraphs with sparse citations, while others like this one lack citations altogether). Also, have there been any new developments lately in the Transport section?
The last thing I noticed were the formatting of the citations in the References section. They should all be consistent. Using templates like  and  really help.
Again, nice work. If you need additional help, you can find me on my talk page, although I might be a bit unreliable because of my schedule, but I'm always worth a try. :]
--Starstriker7(Talk) 07:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursory review 

message: We should not be adding individual events (like a bomb blast) to this article.  As time passes, we may see a particular incident as standing out.  But given the scale of the war, a single bombing, doesn't normally warrant a mention.  --Rob (talk) 16:46, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That was 2011; this is 2012 and current events are very important. Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 14:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  war coverage 

message: From what I can see, there are no real/true sources in the «Demographics» section. I have added several 'citation needed' tags, and one 'clean-up remainder' tag, for it's all without any source whatsoever. If there is anyone who can and/or is willing to improve this: be welcome! 「Robster1983」☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜ 13:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see here now 42 references plus a number of websites, with most of the content not subject to debate. Can you name the problems you see a bit more precisely? --Bernd.Brincken (talk) 15:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: After looking at most of the article, I reckon the article could use an entire clean-up, for there are very little sources used. 「Robster1983」☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜ 13:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see here now 42 references plus a number of websites, with most of the content not subject to debate. Can you name the problems you see a bit more precisely? --Bernd.Brincken (talk) 15:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Total clean-up needed

message: No references, seems to be more opinionated - needs clean up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.146.102 (talk) 23:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture 

message: There is not a single mention or link in this article about the Sep 2012 incident where 52 people were murdered by Al Qaida operatives, including the US Ambassador to Libya. — Loadmaster (talk) 19:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I gave it a sub-heading under "history" - since it isn't part of the 2011 revolution, and seems to warrant a separate heading.  The word "Benghazi" has become synonymous with the attack.  That may fade with time, but that's the city's current "claim to fame." John2510 (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Ambassador's murder 

message: It has been widely reported that orders were given to stand down to all rescue forces beginning with Woods and Doherty who were at the annex when they heard the attack begin.  It was reported they were ordered to stand down two more times when they were at the embassy manning the machine gun emplacement on the roof requesting air support and targeting enemy mortars with lasers.  These facts have been omitted from this article entirely, apparently because the government will not verify this order.  It should be noted that because the government will not verify a known fact while engaging in a cover up does not make it false.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusty103 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stand down orders omitted 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Benghazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090224132315/http://ourworld.compuserve.com:80/homepages/dr_ibrahim_ighneiwa/benghc.htm to http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dr_ibrahim_ighneiwa/benghc.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224015913/http://www.paolocason.it:80/Libia/Pagine/Bengasi.html to http://www.paolocason.it/Libia/Pagine/Bengasi.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081220214410/http://gpco.gov.ly/online/shabyat.php to http://gpco.gov.ly/online/shabyat.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813235059/http://www.fiba-afrique.org:80/en/lect_actu.php?titre=evene&id=4314 to http://www.fiba-afrique.org/en/lect_actu.php?titre=evene&id=4314
*Added  tag to http://www.ssfcm.org/ssfcm_en/index.php?fuseaction=content.fullcontent&mainsection=0000000857&Pub=Yes&Num_of_articals=25&artical=0000001643
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070116222245/http://www.cnn.com:80/2006/WORLD/africa/12/19/libya.aids.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/africa/12/19/libya.aids.ap/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224015913/http://www.paolocason.it:80/Libia/Pagine/Bengasi.html to http://www.paolocason.it/Libia/Pagine/Bengasi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Benghazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dr_ibrahim_ighneiwa/benghc.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.economist.com/node/18239900
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301030122/http://feb17.info/media/first-edition-of-the-benghazi-newspaper/ to http://feb17.info/media/first-edition-of-the-benghazi-newspaper/
*Added  tag to http://panarabjn.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/The-trends-of-neurological-trauma-in-a-decade-of-road-traffic-accidents-2001-to-20101.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/africa/12/19/libya.aids.ap/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.paolocason.it/Libia/Pagine/Bengasi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Benghazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090530105107/http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090529/REVIEW/705289979/1008 to http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090529/REVIEW/705289979/1008
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: As a native Italian speaker, I took the liberty to change "al-Bosco, from a colloquial Italian name for zoo/forest" to "al-Bosco, from an Italian name for wood (as in "Belleau Wood", not as in "wood plank".
Bosco isn't a colloquial term at all; it is the ordinary term for a wood. In Italian "Foresta" refers to very large areas only (Foresta delle Ardenne, Foresta delle Amazzoni). "Bosco" (cognate of the English bush, the French bois, etc.)refers to smaller wooden areas (as in French, compare "Bois de Boulogne"). Zoo has absolutely nothing to do with bosco: in Italian a zoo is a "zoo", period.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.37.48.14 (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  al-Bosco 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I see the editors here have no idea what they're doing. I only changed the rhetoric in one sentence and got bombarded by the Wiki Mafia for "editing without sources". Once again, we see that when some people can't beat you in a logical argument, they pursue other unjustified means. Pathetic. 46.31.118.94 (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When you can't beat someone logically