Talk:Iridium Communications

message: Does anyone have a source for this? Perhaps the patents in question? I'm not doubting its true, I'm just interested in learning more about what exactly they figured out. Thanks! Davandron | Talk 18:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Patents for Production?

message: I've listed this page for cleanup on the grounds that too much of it reads like a corporate presentation on behalf of the company - for instance
*Iridium Satellite now provides the following services,
*Please note that to use this service, you MUST be an International SOS member through one of their qualifying programs
*As an Iridium voice subscriber, your phone performs double-duty as a voice communication and messaging device.
Its possibly also a copyright violation. I find the whole Iridium network a fascinating idea, but the current presentation is unencyclopaedic. --Neo 16:21, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Listing

message: It sounds like although Iridium filled for Chapter 11th, they seem to be back and talking about adding new technologies, (Iridium Announces Plan to Introduce New Cost-Effective Satellite Fax Service this Year) and getting more financing and new customers. (Iridium Closes $32 Million Credit Facility with Bank of America). Based on that I think that Chapter 11 part could be put in the past tense. Etc. How do you put articles up for suggested group updating on Wikipedia? This page requires a small army. CaribDigita 18:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a pretty typical story: startup with grand idea gets financing somehow and startup spends far more than they can afford on infrastructure. startup goes bankrupt under the debt but the infrastruture they have purchased is worth more as a going concern than it would be worth if sold off peicemeal so the system the startup built is kept running. Plugwash 01:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This page should be put-up for updating?

message: prohibited by law? technically blocked by the satalites? what? Plugwash 21:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anybody know what the current situation with any restrictions is in the mentioned countries? Winston.PL 11:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: what exactly does interdicted mean in this context?

message: in the present status section it says
"The system is being used extensively by the U.S. Department of Defense for its communication purposes through the DoD Gateway in Hawaii. The commercial Gateway in Tempe, Arizona provides voice, data and paging services for commercial customers on a global basis"
in the technical information section it says
"There are four earth stations"
so what exactly are the other two earth base stations? 
Plugwash 23:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is one in alaska I think. -86.43.88.90 15:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: what are the other two earth stations

message: Baud is not a measurement unit for data rate. Please fix.
--Xerces8 08:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baud

message: Someone called Liz DeCastro tried to astroturf on this article and removed a whole bunch of technical info. She is a high ranking Iridium staffer by the look of it. I even found a pic of her  Towel401 (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Could equally be a troublemaker pretending to be an irridum staff member. If it was really her I find the action rather odd as the information removed didn't seem to be negative about irridium. Plugwash (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Astroturfing

message: What does this mean?  Taken literally, it suggests that the 50 minute cards are invalid which I'm sure is not what was meant.  Does it mean that the 50 minute cards are valid indefinitely or that their validity expires almost immediately?  --Richard (talk) 18:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: the 50 minute cards have no validity?

message: This name makes the article look like it is about a satellite.  In fact it is about the company and a communications network and associated equipment.  I'd suggest a rename to Iridium Satellite LLC or to Iridium (company).  Also at some point splitting out the network of the satellites into it's own article might make sense.  Vegaswikian (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe without the LLC part at the end, most companies on Wikipedia don't have that but I don't know the official policy for it. I was thinking of moving the satellite network to a different article but it would only confuse things since all of the constellation belongs to that company. Having 2 articles would be awkward Towel401 (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I considered leaving off the LLC, but since the term Iridium satellite is in use when talking about the satellites, leaving off the LLC could be confusing. Normally policy says don't use LLC unless you need it for disambiguation.  For me, this is one of those cases.  As to splitting the article, that becomes a judgment call.  The more you mash into an article, the more confusing it can get.  If there are logical splits that retain notability, then that material should be split, at least in my opinion.  Another guide I like to use is, are there categories that would clearly apply to the split out material?  If yes, then that is another reason to split. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Any article that would be split off should probably contain all the technical details and maybe even stuff about the subscriber units. The rest is all commercial but you will end up with a situation where both of these articles would have to be linked in Iridium while making it clear that one belongs to the other. and it would mean a good bit of duplicated content especially now Iridium 33 already has its own article. which maybe it shouldn't have if someone decides to split this Towel401 (talk) 02:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually no.  At that time creating Iridium (disambiguation) would be proper and might even be justified now.  Vegaswikian (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

text: I'll also note that the size of this article is in the range where consideration should be given to splitting.  The article in its current form is well over the 32K recommended size. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Could somebody please put in the article (under "History", I guess) who was behind Iridium, and who put up the money (and thus who lost their $6 billion)???  As I recall, Craig McCaw of McCaw Cellular Communications was one of the big investors.  As I recall, his cellphone company also didn't make money for years and years, but in that case his cellphone company was able to continue operating by getting financing (mostly in the form of bonds, as I recall) - thus perhaps an initial unprofitability for Iridium would not have scared Craig McCaw???  Also, as I recall, Bill Gates put money into this, yes???  Can somebody who knows please address who put up the $6 billion?  Thanks in advance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.203.210 (talk) 07:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Who was behind Iridium???

message: For the handset phones, is there a specific reason for the antenna to be so long?
Are they trying to use the most efficient (full wave) dipole length, or are they just trying to get the active element as far away from the user's head as is feasible, so that they can broadcast a stronger signal?
In the last ten use fractal antennas have taken off for use in regular cellphones to shrink their size. Do any satellite phones use fractal antennas?
DMahalko (talk) 15:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phone antenna shape, and fractal antennas 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:45153-hi-satt01.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: The article claims that Iridium phones exist as bag phones, but the link to bag phone just redirects to History of mobile phones, and that article makes no mention of bag phones. 
There is an article Motorola Bag Phone, but that article does not mention Iridium. 
It seems quite likely to me that there is, or was, such a thing as an Iridium bag phone, a Motorola Bag Phone or otherwise, but I can find no reference.
FrankSier (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bag phone & Iridium? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Iridium Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080803081835/http://www.gcn.com:80/print/17_30/33906-1.html to http://www.gcn.com/print/17_30/33906-1.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090425195334/http://www.globalcomsatphone.com:80/iridium/smithsonian.html to http://www.globalcomsatphone.com/iridium/smithsonian.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131203011010/http://www.iridium.com/products/iridium9601.aspx to http://www.iridium.com/products/iridium9601.aspx
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130213001037/http://iridium.com/products/Iridium-9603.aspx to http://www.iridium.com/products/Iridium-9603.aspx
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.gmpcs-us.com/Menu/WhatsNew/iridium_dialing.aspx
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140728130753/https://www.satnotify.com/ to https://www.satnotify.com
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150623004603/http://www.integratednetworkcable.com/uncategorized/the-global-telephone-system-iridium to http://www.integratednetworkcable.com/uncategorized/the-global-telephone-system-iridium
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080720070109/http://www.beamcommunications.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=5 to http://www.beamcommunications.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=5
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Iridium Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-technology/2-orbiting-satellites-collide-500-miles-up-20090212-857v.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216023723/http://www.spaceandtech.com/digest/sd2001-01/sd2001-01-009.shtml to http://www.spaceandtech.com/digest/sd2001-01/sd2001-01-009.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214193101/http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&articleId=9049898 to http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&articleId=9049898
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320174824/http://www.maritime-executive.com/pressrelease/iridium-openport-global-service-program-in-operation-effective-april-1 to http://www.maritime-executive.com/pressrelease/iridium-openport-global-service-program-in-operation-effective-april-1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160226143807/http://www.leaf-consulting.de/ to http://www.leaf-consulting.de/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303223256/http://www.uuplus.com/documentation/Iridium%20Modem%20Configuration.pdf to http://www.uuplus.com/documentation/Iridium%20Modem%20Configuration.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.keithdishman.com/work.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616082959/http://www.erziasat.com/savepdf.php?dir=dbfiles%2Fupload%2F&file=P-46_spec.pdf to http://www.erziasat.com/savepdf.php?dir=dbfiles%2Fupload%2F&file=P-46_spec.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928083151/https://screamyguy.net/ephemeris/viewer.htm?TITLE=Iridium to http://screamyguy.net/ephemeris/viewer.htm?TITLE=Iridium
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iridium Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616082959/http://www.erziasat.com/savepdf.php?dir=dbfiles%2Fupload%2F&file=P-46_spec.pdf to http://www.erziasat.com/savepdf.php?dir=dbfiles%2Fupload%2F&file=P-46_spec.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iridium Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121212223052/https://www.disadirect.disa.mil/products/asp/news/gateway_closures.asp to https://www.disadirect.disa.mil/products/asp/news/gateway_closures.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Iridium Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615173129/http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=21434 to http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=21434
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100404154539/http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/hardware/2043897/kyocera-ki-g100-sd-66k to http://www.pcw.co.uk/personal-computer-world/hardware/2043897/kyocera-ki-g100-sd-66k
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120416045951/http://www.outfittersatellite.com/iridium_9520.htm to http://www.outfittersatellite.com/iridium_9520.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307203448/http://www.voicemall.com/iridium_9501.htm to http://www.voicemall.com/iridium_9501.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Iridium Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100425012310/http://cnnmoneycontrol.com/1999/08/13/companies/iridium/ to http://cnnmoneycontrol.com/1999/08/13/companies/iridium/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170626030410/http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/25/spacex-is-critical-to-iridiums-future-says-ceo-matt-desch.html to https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/25/spacex-is-critical-to-iridiums-future-says-ceo-matt-desch.html/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414072051/http://www.icao.int/anb/panels/acp/wg/m/iridium_swg/ird-08/ird-swg08-ip05%20-%20ams(r)s%20manual%20part%20ii%20v4.0.pdf to http://www.icao.int/anb/panels/acp/wg/m/iridium_swg/ird-08/ird-swg08-ip05%20-%20ams(r)s%20manual%20part%20ii%20v4.0.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The list of devices seems out of date, i.e. SpotX and Garmin are providing emergency transmitters that also have weather report and message functions using the Iridium system.150.227.15.253 (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the list is quite old and should be refreshed. Also, the list has been recently (november 5) flagged for possible copyright infringement, I strongly think that it doesn't have such a problem. Still, it may be a good time to update it and make it more neutral.Alegui (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Devices 

message: While looking around to try and figure out if I could find anything to help this out, I did come across the report from the Canadian DD witch does have a good bit of info in it. I am not sure if it can be used or not. I would believe govt documents over the actual Iridium website though. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a371293.pdf BobTheMan 04:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian Defense Department test 

message: ?? 77.243.22.61 (talk) 14:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do u do u 

message: I was just reading the article and the subsection "International Sponsor of War" seems a little out of place.
Under my reading of the neutrality policy, this should probably be re-phrased, maybe to something like "Sanctions Violations during Russo-Ukrainian War".
Not trying to dispute the content of the section, but I can't see a good justification for the needlessly inflammatory header line. Mrobinson1997 (talk) 21:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Inappropriate Section Header