Talk:List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days

message: The article mentions the risk is uncertain for this day, but is presumed to be high risk due to results. I worked as an intern for the National Weather Service in Wichita during this time and specifically remember this day. This was a moderate risk, 100% certain. The results would certainly point towards a high risk event, but every outlook that day maintained a moderate risk. 
Djkc28 (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it since that cited source states that it was probably a moderate risk day. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2/27/20 - High risk day of March 13, 1990  

message: Food for thought.  If someone has the graphical technology to melt the high risk area into the Storm Reports graphic from the two links below, I believe you'll show that there was almost nothing that happened with the high risk area.  One tornado, maybe two.  All of the bad weather stayed away from it.  
* 
* 
Gopher backer 05:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A bust typically means little or no severe weather in the high risk area (I tend to think of a bust as when the severe weather would have only verified a slight risk at the most), but that is definitely used differently by different people. CrazyC83 22:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This list can't just be about whether or not any tornadoes occurred and/or how many people were killed. SPC/SELS isn't (and hasn't) been issuing these kind of outlooks for just tornado occurrence for a very long time now. See further discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Severe_weather#List_of_SPC_high-risk_days. Guy1890 (talk) 05:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How do these sound, then for suggested information to list on top of what we have: event type (e.g. derecho, tornado outbreak), total severe weather and/or wind reports, strongest non-tornadic gust. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a pretty good start, and certainly better than the current article has right now. To verify an SPC High Risk day, you'll need to know the # of tornadoes (and how strong they were on the EF scale, which was changed only as of early 2007), whether there was a derecho or not (I'm not sure if SPC would issue a High Risk just for a nasty Squall line or not), and the highest wind gusts (which will likely be a range of values) that occurred during the event. You'll also obviously need to eyeball where the severe weather actually occurred on a map, and if it occurred in (or at least pretty near) the SPC High Risk area. I'm sure that you know that SPC issues their risk areas several times per day and that the areas that they highlight can change over time. Guy1890 (talk) 02:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In terms of where the severe weather was, I think the outlook verifications such as this one would come in handy, though I don't think we need to go too in-depth. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Guy1890 (talk) 02:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  4/24/07 - What constitues a bust? 

message: What was the source for this list?  Is it available to the public?  As far as I can see, the SPC's website only goes back to 2000.  Thanks. Adam 19:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the most part, the website link at the bottom has a compilation. If any are omitted from that site but later discovered (this list may be incomplete), then the new source should get mentioned. CrazyC83 01:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, that link disappeared as the site lapsed. CrazyC83 (talk) 04:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I've managed to source about half of them, and still working on the rest. CrazyC83 (talk) 00:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Since the site that had compiled the list disappeared, I think we need to re-research this to find additional links (if possible). I know everything back to 2000 is verifiable easily. CrazyC83 (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've managed to source about half of them, and still working on the rest. CrazyC83 (talk) 00:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-research project?

message: Looks like the author went and got himself his own URL.
http://convectiveoutlook.com/highrisk/1999highrisk/outlooks.htm
Gopher backer (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Found the new page

message: High risk underway today. (For the carolinas.) 74.12.126.46 (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  uh oh... 

message: I don't know how but here some older dates in this blog mentioned to have been High Risk- http://www.patricktmarsh.com/2011/02/aotw-storm-prediction-center-moderate-high-risks/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.160.123 (talk) 02:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmentioned High Risk Outlooks??? 

message: It seems these IP editors are getting rather insistent about "Satan's Ultimate Tornado Oubtreak." Should we semi-protect the article at least until May 13 so we don't have to deal with this? TornadoLGS (talk) 16:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, this vandalism is continuing. This article should be semi-protected.TornadoLGS (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Ok, this vandalism has come to a stop. This article should no longer be semi-protected.TornadoLGS (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The vandalism stopped because it's protected. It'll stay as such for a month due to the consistency of the vandalism before. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not say that. An IP user copied my signature. Look at the talk page history.TornadoLGS (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh....well now. Well, that IP gets the point now :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added everything back for archiving purposes. The discussion must be kept, but I added a strike. United States Man (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I mean, them IP’s weren’t completely and utterly wrong. They predicted that a major tornado outbreak would happen on May 18, 2013; if happened two days later on the 20th and Moore, OK was destroyed. But there wasn’t a high risk out. 12.74.221.43 (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi protection? 

message: I was the original author of the archive site. The host was hacked and the site disappeared in September, 2007. Someone else created the domain at convectiveoutlook.com and I passed along all the pages and graphics I still had.
If you'd like to fill in some of the missing graphics, I have uploaded all the ones I have from prior to 2003 (when they all become available on the SPC's own archive) to my Photobucket:
http://s26.photobucket.com/user/wisconsinskies/library/WildWeather/Convective%20Outlooks%201989-2002/High%20Risks
72.128.200.92 (talk) 16:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphics 

message: Someone should check all the death tolls. I just browsed and found two obvious mistakes without checking others. Andover had a death toll of 56 when it was really in the 20s.. and Super Tuesday had a death toll in the 40s even though it was 56. Super Tuesday was the deadliest tornado day since Ohio/Pennsylvania until 4/27/11. Sounds like someone wants to deflate that day, imo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.50.95.2 (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  blatantly incorrect death tolls 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for www.firedispatcher.com/1991/april_28,_1991.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.firedispatcher.com/1991/april_11,_1991.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There was a high risk area for parts of west Texas and Oklahoma on May 16. 1989. see link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGra7mrshSo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.246.12 (talk) 08:16, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  old high risk day discovered 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205124033/http://www.cswr.org/dow/dow.htm to http://cswr.org/dow/DOW.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071029183036/http://www.nwas.org/ej/2007-EJ3/figure_1.htm to http://www.nwas.org/ej/2007-EJ3/figure_1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071029003706/http://www.nwas.org/ej/pdf/2007-EJ3.pdf to http://www.nwas.org/ej/pdf/2007-EJ3.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20131118023104/http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/e032b7228f06431e86fcc1183bfaed21/US-Severe-Weather-Deaths to http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/e032b7228f06431e86fcc1183bfaed21/US-Severe-Weather-Deaths
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=04&beginDate_dd=06&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=04&endDate_dd=06&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=04&beginDate_dd=06&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=04&endDate_dd=06&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=04&beginDate_dd=11&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=04&endDate_dd=11&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=04&beginDate_dd=11&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=04&endDate_dd=11&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=06&beginDate_dd=11&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=06&endDate_dd=11&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=06&beginDate_dd=11&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=06&endDate_dd=11&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=10&beginDate_dd=13&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=10&endDate_dd=13&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=10&beginDate_dd=13&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=10&endDate_dd=13&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=10&beginDate_dd=24&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=10&endDate_dd=24&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=10&beginDate_dd=24&beginDate_yyyy=2001&endDate_mm=10&endDate_dd=24&endDate_yyyy=2001&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=04&beginDate_dd=16&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=04&endDate_dd=16&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=04&beginDate_dd=16&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=04&endDate_dd=16&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=07&beginDate_dd=31&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=07&endDate_dd=31&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=07&beginDate_dd=31&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=07&endDate_dd=31&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=11&beginDate_dd=10&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=11&endDate_dd=10&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=11&beginDate_dd=10&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=11&endDate_dd=10&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160117033320/http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=12&beginDate_dd=23&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=12&endDate_dd=23&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?beginDate_mm=12&beginDate_dd=23&beginDate_yyyy=2002&endDate_mm=12&endDate_dd=23&endDate_yyyy=2002&eventType=%28C%29+ALL&submitbutton=Search&statefips=-999%2CALL
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The high risk map has been updated, and the high risk area has been enlarged and shifted slightly east. 
https://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day1otlk.html
--RSVBibleReader52738 (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: High Risk on May 20, 2019

message: 12:33pm CDT SPC Day2 Outlook has a Moderate Risk, with a mention of a possible upgrade to high risk on day 1.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0w0 catt0s (talk • contribs) 17:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expected high risk upgrade - March 2021 Event 

message: Please make sure your outlooks have proper data when uploaded. Copyright information and source should be included. 
:
:==  ==
:{{Information
:|description=
:|date=`YYYY`-`MM`-`DD` `ZZ`:`ZZ`
:|source=https://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/archive/'YYYY'/day1otlk_'YYYYMMDD'_'ZZZZ'.html 
:|author=National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center
:|permission=
:|other versions=
:|additional_information = 
:}}
:
:====
:
:Category:Tornadoes of 'year'
:Category:Storm Prediction Center convective outlooks
:
Using UTC time, replace all "YYYY" areas with the year, All "MM" areas with the month number, and all "D" areas with the day number. "ZZ:ZZ" is the Zulu (UTC) time the product was issued and "local time" with the the central time (CDT or CST) of the issued product. This is because the SPC uses both. Replace "area" with the area of the high risk, and add any more information needed. This is just a guide, but it should solve a few problems. 
0w0 catt0s (talk) 01:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  READ before uploading outlooks! 

message: Notes column is too narrow and long.  Stretches page requiring scrolling to read. Fiveinchheels (talk) 10:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Display issue 

message: We should have an article for WPC high risks on the excessive rainfall outlook. They are probably rarer than SPC high risks in some cases. 12.74.221.43 (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: And they haven’t been issued for as long. Only about the last ten years. 12.74.221.43 (talk) 21:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive rainfall outlooks?