lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chillicothe Gazette

message: Infobox is incomplete. Needs a front page, cost of copy of paper, etc. The article is missing any mention of its political and editorial policies/stance. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox etc.

message: As proposed last month, it seems reasonable to merge Centinel of the Northwest Territory into here; it seems they differ only by a name change (many years ago), but that the history is otherwise continuous. Klbrain (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with merge. These are the same paper. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

text: I have merged the two pages together. Centinel of the Northwest Territory will now be a redirect to Chillicothe Gazette. Eric Schucht (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Japanese wine

message: Added image of red wine Unagi Inu (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --BorgQueen (talk) 09:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: This section of the article states "There are relatively few independent wine producers in Japan, the industry being dominated by large beverage conglomerates such as Suntory, owner of the Snaraku, and Manns Wine brands...". However, Manns Wine is owned by Kikkoman, which does not, in turn, appear to be owned by Suntory. See Manns Wine's website https://mannswines.com/english/ where the statement "Manns Wines is a wine brand belonging to Kikkoman" appears in the bottom right corner of the page. Furthermore, on Suntory's webpage about its wine business, Mann's is not mentioned: https://www.suntory.com/business/wine/index.html 2405:6581:6340:8500:91DF:28D5:2D73:9DE9 (talk) 22:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industry structure
Talk:The Delaware Gazette

message: Infobox is incomplete. Needs a front page, cost of copy of paper, etc. The article is missing any mention of its political and editorial policies/stance. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox etc.

message: The article says that The Delaware Gazette published its first edition as a daily newspaper on January 10, 1884. This can't be right. When my great great grandfather died, his obit was published in Delaware, Ohio, on 13 Sep 1904 in what was called Semi-Weekly Gazette. It was published only twice a week, I believe on Tuesdays and Fridays. (If it had been a daily newspaper by that date, I doubt it would have been called Semi-Weekly Gazette.)
When my great grandfather died, his obit was published on 15 Mar 1937 in The Delaware Gazette.
Microfiche of the old Semi-Weekly Gazette and the later The Delaware Gazette is available at the Delaware County District Library.
Mrs rockefeller (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of First Daily Newspaper Incorrect
Talk:Location, Location, Location

message: he2sa: I think there should be a separate page for relocation relocation as it is a separate show with as much information about it if not more than location location location and although it is a spinoff so is torchwood and that has it's own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by He2sa (talk • contribs) 16:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - a new, twelve-part series of RRR began yesterday. F W Nietzsche (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I have deleted the following paragraph:
:Location, Location, Location has been criticised for ramping property prices, most recently by BBC Panorama (2 June 2008) which identified it as one of the property programmes which has contributed to the current property bubble.
due to a lack of any supporting evidence for either of its two accusations. If the original author wishes to return it to the page, he or she should be aware that indictments of that nature must have SOME corroboration.
Additionally this is a show that focuses on people moving home, not on property development, inflating prices or profiteering, and there is nothing to suggest that the Panorama episode in question (Season 56, Episode 22, 'Property - High Anxiety', first broadcast June 2, 2008) made any specific allegation and instead merely made mention of "TV property programmes".
Someone with an axe to grind? Not that there are any such people on Wikipedia of course ThwartedEfforts (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panorama: Property - High Anxiety 

message: Re. the above comments suggesting there needs to be a separate article on "Relocation Relocation Relocation". If one goes to the category "Property buying programmes", one will see that "Relocation Relocation Relocation" is listed separately to "Location Location Location" there. Vorbee (talk) 17:01, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate article
Talk:En primeur

message: The article states "the wines most commonly offered en primeur are from Bordeaux, Burgundy, the Rhône Valley and Port", citing The Wine Doctor's glossary as a source. Perhaps I'm confused today, but doesn't this seriously overstate the frequency of non-Bordeaux en primeur trading? Is it really more than a very marginal phenomenon outside of Bordeaux? I know one top Rhône producer who offers wines en primeur, but don't think I've ever seen Burgundy wines sold en primeur. On preorder, by strict allocation, only to long-standing importers - for sure - but actually sold by the producer as a future before bottling??? Or does the wine trade in certain countries use the term "en primeur" as a synonym to preorder or preorder+prepayment in general, even in cases when they don't actually own the wine themselves? If so, I think we may need to expand the article to include this usage. Tomas e (talk) 13:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Re Port, Graham’s Port Bond is the only Port en primeur I’ve seen. JDAWiseman (talk) 09:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''En primeur'' outside of Bordeaux 
Talk:Ohio Military Reserve

message: I removed the History section which appears to be copied from http://oko.ohmr.ohio.gov/join/info_about.php. http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Ohio_Military_Reserve is also a duplicate which includes a list of references but lacks the last two paragraphs. –dlthewave ☎ 21:36, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Star Beacon

message: Infobox is missing info.  Needs cost of copy of paper, etc.  The article is missing expanded mention of its political and editorial policies/stance.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox etc.

message: Is the paper still seven days a week?  I live here and have yet to find Tuesday or Sunday editions on newsstands.  The problem is finding an online source to back that up. Smk (talk) 17:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Circulation
Talk:Vinography

message: It is a little misleading to list these as "references" since they aren't referencing anything in the body of the article. I'm not advocating the complete removal of these links since they are pertinent to establishing the notability of the wine blog by documenting non-trivial, third party write ups. What needs to be done is to turn this from being a spam list to actually true references that is incorporated into the body of the article. Some of the links do need to go, like the ones written on blogs which really don't hold much snuff with our reliable source policies.  Things like the New York Times and San Fran Chronicle do pass as long as the mention of Vinography is not a trivial one or two line mention in passing. I'm going to look at some of these links in more detail and help incorporate some of them into the article. AgneCheese/Wine 19:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *UpdateI incorporated several of the useful links into the blog and toned down some slight POV that was there. The only useful link that I haven't found a home for is the last one above-the San Fran chronicle "Going blog wild". It duplicates the info of some of the other links with the only thing really being unique is the mention that the blog is not for profit. At the moment I can't think of the most seamless way to integrate that tidbit into the article. Any suggestions would be appreciated. I also did a web search to try and find some more non-trivial sources but could come up with anything so far. But it still worth looking for. AgneCheese/Wine 21:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on the above

message: Thanks for taking the time to so throughly go through those links and describe the rationale for each. I have a better understanding now of your goals for the article, which I agree with. Gnocchiandwine (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on the above
Talk:Stark County Sheriff's Office

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Ohio stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
There's a bunch of suspicious deletions on this page, mostly concerned with the unlawful strip search incidents and related lawsuits.  I suggest this page be semi-protected to preserve this.
I'm re-adding the deleted material and removing the uncited portion, if you're going to re-add the comment about the state attorney's findings, please add a citation with it.  220.233.42.204 (talk) 16:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fail2ban

message: Do quotes belong in the "See also" section? --Mortense (talk) 17:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes in the "See also" section 

message: What is AGIs? 5.102.213.69 (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It stands for Asterisk Gateway Interface, see https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Application_AGI I would remove it though. --Meskobalazs (talk) 12:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is AGI (APIs/AGIs)? 

message: This section especially, but other parts too, seems to me like an attempt to discourage people from using this software and using a different one instead. I believe it violates neutral point of view.
70.250.118.222 (talk) 13:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortcomings section
Template talk:ISOCALENDAR

message: See Commons for some bugs in this template: . Nsaa 13:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

message: ===The problems===
====m and y defaults====
Until now the month and year have been required.  If either of them are omitted, we get a table full of error messages.  Aren't we better off defaulting to the current year and/or month?  Surely we are. JIMp talk·cont 06:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange default behaviour

message: ====m and y defaults====
Until now the month and year have been required.  If either of them are omitted, we get a table full of error messages.  Aren't we better off defaulting to the current year and/or month?  Surely we are. JIMp talk·cont 06:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The problems

message: Until now the month and year have been required.  If either of them are omitted, we get a table full of error messages.  Aren't we better off defaulting to the current year and/or month?  Surely we are. JIMp talk·cont 06:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: <code>m</code> and <code>y</code> defaults

message: At commons I mentioned a bug which can crop up when neither cw or cdow are not specified.  The default is to highlight the current day of the week of the current week.  This is fine if the year also matches, you get today highlighted.  If the year is different, however, you get a day with matching week and days numbers, just some other day.  Problems also occur when only one of cw or cdow is specified.  The unspecified one defaults to the current value with similar ludicrous results.
Here's what I suggest.
*If neither cw nor cdow are specified, highlight only today.
*If only cw is specified, highlight the whole week. 
*If only cdow is specified, highlight the corresponding day of the week for the whole month.
No more highlighting partial matches. JIMp talk·cont 06:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: <code>cw</code> and <code>cdow</code> defaults

message: If the first unnamed parameter is left blank, we get "" as the title.  Why not default to the name of the month and the year displayed?  Why not? JIMp talk·cont 06:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: <code>1</code> default

message: All of this has been solved.  A new version now sits in the sandbox.  I'll soon be replacing the current version.  The new version has a couple of other benificial spin offs.
*The template  will be redundant since it's equivalent to the default behaviour of the new version.
*The templates that the old version has been relying on have been replaced with the  parser function thus several of them also might become redundant.
*It will be possible to specify the month as a word or abbreviation.
JIMp talk·cont 06:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The solution

message: This seems like a pretty commonsense thing to do -- I am going to look and see how hard this would be. jp×g🗯️ 18:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The answer is "a gigantic pain in the ass". Implemented -- the template now shows dimmed (style="opacity: 0.3;") cells when the days are outside of the month being displayed. Wow, what a hassle. jp×g🗯️ 19:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-emphasizing days outside the month
Talk:Athabasca (Saskatchewan provincial electoral district)

message: I believe that Athabasca (former Saskatchewan provincial electoral district) and Athabasca (Saskatchewan provincial electoral district) should be merged because the ridings are from the same area and that there is no reason why these two articles should be separate. The size of the article is not a problem at the present time. As for Île-à-la-Crosse (electoral district) I don't know that district enough to say. Are they in the same area? Ndchriste (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 
Talk:Claes Fornell

message: This article is being edited by a computer registered to the University of Michigan Stephen M. Ross School of Business. Editors proposing to write about themselves, their own organizations, or matters they have very close ties to, are strongly advised not to edit or create such articles at all (except for certain non-controversial edits) but to instead use the talk page to request help from neutral editors. --Malcolmxl5 13:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest

message: I've made significant edits to this article to conform with basic WP:BLP policies, so I'll note here what and why:
# Removed overly self-serving claims per WP:BLPSPS including:
## This subject "is one of the world's leading experts on customer satisfaction measurement, stock portfolio returns on customer satisfaction, and the impact of aggregate customer satisfaction on economic growth," citing this publication by his employer, Tianjin University (reporting on its own award), as well as several other publications that do not actually support this claim. The Tianjin cite only supports the "one of the world's leading experts" claim, so I removed the rest because we can't cobble together what sources don't say directly (see WP:OR, WP:SYNTH). At any rate, a better supporting cite for this claim would be ideal, since it's asserting notability.
## "At the 100-year anniversary of the Stockholm School of Economics in 2009, he was awarded an honorary doctorate in economics" supported by another publication of his employer
## "Fornell is recognized as the most influential marketing science scholar in the world. His article on structural equations in the Journal of Marketing Research is the most cited article in the history of that publication," supported by the publication by his employer and Fornell's own publication. First, the supporting cites don't actually say this; second, these are clearly not reliable sources independent of the subject.
# Removed unsupported claims regarding education and honorary degrees.
# Removed the massive "partial bibliography" after external links. The most relevant publications are mentioned within the prose, so the list added little meaning to the content. Any reader will know this subject is extensively published. See also WP:RESUME.
# A few cites, such as the NYT Q&A and the Housing Zone article didn't seem to support much anything, but they are very relevant to this subject. I've moved them to the external link section.
Many primary sources remain; it would be best to replace them with the reviews they've apparently garnered. Otherwise, since they're scholarly primary sources subject to review, they're not exactly WP:SPS, so I've left them. It's hard to tell, but this subject's notability might be WP:INHERITed from his work, meaning the information about him might best belong in the American Customer Satisfaction Index article. JFHJr (㊟) 19:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP edit 

message: Major contributions from User:CFIGroup. JBL (talk) 14:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (October 2021)
Talk:Cumberland (Saskatchewan provincial electoral district)

message: Cumberland as a riding has existed since the 1912 Saskatchewan General Election. Yet this article has results only since 2003. If anyone can solve this please help. Thanks. Ndchriste (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Election Results 

message: What happened to Cumberland in the 1934 election? My guess is that it was briefly merged into Athabasca, because Deakin Hall ran there in '34, but I really don't know. FUNgus guy (talk) 05:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 1934 election
Talk:Lloydminster (electoral district)

message: Please add information about the Saskatchewan side of Lloydminster (and other communities within the riding)! - Jwkozak91 20:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Info on Saskatchewan side of Lloydminster City
Talk:Charles A. Miller House

message: Someone posted at :WP:THQ#Wrong Photo on Charles Miller House (Cincinnati) page that the current infobox photo is incorrect and I think they might be right based upon this. Is there anyone in the area who can verify this and possibly take a replacement photo? Unless someone feels that the current photo is actually the Miller house, I think the file should be removed from the article even if no replacement is available. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Replacement photo was found by  and added to the article. Thanks Ɱ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong infobox photo
Talk:Chateau Laroche

message: says the castle was named after a "Chateau la Roche" in France near a World War II battlefield. Is it any of the castles listed in Château de la Roche (disambiguation)? – Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Château Laroche?
Talk:A Small Place in Italy

message: I have added in a plot summary and plot for this travel book. Ivankinsman 14:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tuttle (M*A*S*H)

message: What idiot put this up for deletion for maybe not meeting notability guideline for television episodes?
I've referenced the tuttle episode numerous times throughout my life and have not had people not understand what I was referencing. This EP is in standard rotation. Some 20 something jerkoff has never heard of it and all of a sudden the reference is up for deletion? One more great reason to NOT donate to wikipedia until this kinda crap is resolved.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyster (talk • contribs) 14:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2007
Talk:Dayton Arcade

message: A pair of photographs depicting the Arcade have been added to this article.  I took the images with a Pentax camera in 1980, a few months before the grand opening of Arcade Square in the Spring or Summer of that year.  I myself worked at one of the restaurants (Mandarin Kitchen) in that early re-configuration of the Arcade.
--Jsteeber (talk) 20:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 

message: To date, I have added ten images to this article, to help give it life.
The only usable rotunda image I have which isn't in someone else's collection, is simply from a 1920's/30's post card.  It shows the Arcade Market still in use mainly as a food market, before the space seen in that image was remanded to a small discount department store.  The other images, depicting the various buildings of the arcade, are scanned from a remarkable souvenir gala program issued in 1904.  I have added the cover to that program, as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsteeber (talk • contribs) 17:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More photographs
Talk:4-Chloroaniline

message: Move to 2-chloroaniline? This isomer is of particularly minor importance, it's 2-chloroaniline that is more significant, commercially and environmentally.  Of course we could just create an article on 2-chloroaniline.--Smokefoot (talk) 19:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to 2-chloroaniline?

message: The link to the Oxford MSDS web resource no longer functions, as Oxford has stopped maintaining it. Perhaps change the link to this: http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9923407
67.255.226.242 (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: MSDS sheet
Talk:Fenn Tower

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Ohio stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkiersBot (talk • contribs) 14:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lorenz Adlon

message: *not citable but something to verify :
* https://www.geni.com/people/Jacob-Adlon/6000000056808686949
:* https://www.geni.com/people/Anna-Maria-Elisabeth-Adlon/6000000057974346190
::* https://www.geni.com/people/Adam-Adlon/6000000057974848838
::* https://www.geni.com/people/Carl-Ludwig-Adlon/6000000057974848842
::* https://www.geni.com/people/Franz-Adlon/6000000057974848834
::* https://www.geni.com/people/Johann-Jakob-Adlon/6000000057974848821
::* https://www.geni.com/people/Margaretha-Adlon/6000000057974848825
::* https://www.geni.com/people/Lorenz-Adlon/6000000056808715921
:::* https://www.geni.com/people/Fanny-Adlon/6000000057974472882
:::* https://www.geni.com/people/Susanna-Carolina-Adlon/6000000057973893308
::::* https://www.geni.com/people/NN-Adlon/6000000056808213177
::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Elsa/6000000057974392876
::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Anna-Katharina/6000000057974197087
::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Louis-Ludwig-Anton-Adlon/6000000056808772900
:::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Hedwig-Hedda-Adlon/6000000057974360891
:::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Tilly-Adlon/6000000057974375876
::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Carl-Adlon/6000000057974249081
::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Lorenz-Adlon/6000000057974249085
::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Elisabeth-Adlon/6000000057974249093
::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Louis-Adlon/6000000057974249077
:::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Rose-Davies/6000000008871766921
::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Susanne-Adlon/6000000056809382964
:::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/NN-Meyerh%C3%B6fer/6000000057975676880
:::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Rudolf-Laubenthal/6000000056809531880
::::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Percy-Adlon/6000000057975623929
:::::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Eleonore-Adlon/********************
::::::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Felix-Adlon/********************
:::::::::::* https://www.geni.com/people/Pamela-Adlon/********************
:64.175.40.229 (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  geni.com/people