lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clique (graph theory)

message: Should be a disambiguation page with Clique (social group).  --Daniel C. Boyer 20:09, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends on whether k is part of the input; if it is, then nk is exponential. But this doesn't really have to be explained under this lemma, which is graph theoretic and not complexity theoretic, so I'll just remove it. --Mellum 12:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: i remember in math class getting one of these and being asked how many triangles.
i think the answer was 96!  (but i don't know why i remember that??)
Newtowiki2 (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: how many triangles?

message: Finding whether there is a clique of a given size in a graph (the clique problem) is NP-complete.
This is wrong. If the size of the clique is given (so it is a fixed value) it is not NP-complete. If you have an algorithm which gets the graph and k (=size of the clique) as input, it could solve this problem in polynomial time.
Only the problem to find the largest clique (now the size of the clique is a variable) is NP-complete.
--143.205.215.18 (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the size is given as part of the input (thus, a variable, not as a constant), it's still NP-complete. It's only when the size is fixed before the input is given that it can be solved in polynomial time. So it would be wrong if the word "given" were replaced by the word "fixed", but is correct as written. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NP-complete 

message: A clique is defined as a subset of its vertices such that every two vertices in the subset are connected by a single edge.  In a multigraph there can be multiple edges between vertices, so do cliques generalise to multigraphs such that a clique in a multigraph is defined as every two vertices connected by at least n edges?  Is that worth mentioning in this article or is it better suited in the multigraphs article? pgr94 (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe a clique is a subgraph rather than a subset of vertices, so you have to choose which one of the multiple edges to use? We would need a source that provides a clear definition. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cliques in multigraphs 

message: Is it "click"? someone should add something about how it is pronounced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.59.221.42 (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to pronounce? 

message: In the Definitions section, we read:
The clique cover number of a graph G is the smallest number of cliques of G whose union covers V(G).
However, V(G) is nowhere defined or explained in the article.  In this context, the intent seems to be to identify the set of vertices V of the graph G = (V,E), so I'm editing the definition to read instead:
The clique cover number of a graph G is the smallest number of cliques of G whose union covers the set of vertices V of the graph.
Please improve these definitions if necessary.  yoyo (talk) 14:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation V(G)
Talk:Politics of Bolivia

message: > President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada; Vice President Carlos Mesa
I thought Mesa was President now?
¿Ahora el presidente no es Sr. Mesa? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.8.184.25 (talk) 20:16, 20 April 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Six months later, on December 18, 2005, the Socialist indigenous leader, Evo Morales, was elected president, to the general dismay of the United States government." - I do not think this phrase in bold is relevant to an overview article about the Politics of Bolivia, so I have removed it. Place statements of this nature here: -Foreign_relations_of_Bolivia#Bolivia_and_United_States_relations 
Tozznok 22:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement in "Executive Branch" paragraph 

message: This heading is both POV and inaccurate. No organization refers to itself as a political pressure group. "Lobby group" would also be inappropriate, since they do more than lobby, and carry out activities of their own separate from any attempt to influence policy. I suppose you could call them NGOs, but this obscures their political and grassroots character. And social movements is more in line with how they refer to themselves.
This is also a somewhat uninformative section. Some kind of summary of the social movements and their role in politics/history is called for. It's also a bit bizarre to just append particular influential individuals names at the end of each entry. 134.153.182.238 (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Political pressure groups" heading 

message: The government section of the "Outline of Bolivia" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.
When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process.  Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.
Please check that this country's outline is not in error.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehelpfulbot (talk • contribs) 20:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important notice 

message: The article claims that the 2009 referendum allowed re-election of the president, while the article President of Bolivia claims the opposite. So which is right? In case this article is right, it would be interesting to know if it allows re-election only once or several times. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2009 Constitution allowed for a single consecutive re-electionas opposed to the previous system, where presidents could run for reelection but not consecutively, à la Virginia. A 2017 Supreme Court ruling abolished term limits entirely; this is still in effect. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully that answers your question, over a decade later. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:14, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-electability?
Talk:Klaus Schulze

message: Okay, lets count (not including reissues, re-releases etc): ~43 solo and w/Lisa albums (~59 CDs) + 7 Wahnfried albums (7 CDs) + DSOTM 11 albums (11 CDs) + The Ultimate Edition (lets count it as 1 album and 50 CDs) + CW 1 and 2 (lets count it as 2 albums and 16 CDs = well, here at least 64 albums and 143 CDs. I think we for sure can write "more than 60/140". 95.26.61.46 (talk) 06:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The lede still says "more than 60", the next section "more than 40". Neither is cited. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Albums and CDs 

message: ...called Macksy? I own a copy myself and it is one of the rare ocasions where he had released a single at all, if not the only single he has ever released. OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 12:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: --Viennese Waltz 12:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Due my restrictions (whitelist), I'm unable to click the link but I got the message. My question was actually, why isn't it included in the article? OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 12:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Because no-one has added it. --Viennese Waltz 15:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the maxi-single... 

message: This is where My Ty She is from. Not mentioned in Discography. 2601:282:1300:B070:951A:EF32:493D:78B0 (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of Contemporary Works I and also listed under "Reissues from sets". Jmj713 (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the Ballet series? 

message: Did he have a middle name? Brief search didn't turn up anything Iokevins (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle name?
Talk:List of major figures in the video game industry

message: Page is currently almost identical to list of people in the game industry but, as that list develops, this one will develop more slowly. Snowspinner 21:03, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't say I see the point with this one. Until it's grown tremendously much more, I prefer the idea of putting emphasis on the most important figures in the general list. Fredrik 08:09, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an editorial convenience thing. It's easier to split the list now, when they're both relatively small than to wait for list of figures to expand dramatically, and then have to sort out a spinoff. The emphasis would be good, but I always like when you can filter out minor information. As I see it, more ways to get information are superior to fewer. Snowspinner 14:51, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Alec (Charmed)

message: Article listed on WP:VFD Apr 20 to Apr 26 2004, consensus was to keep.  Discussion:
Keep. Dispite being a ghastly write-up, he is a valid character. Should be moved to something like Alec (Charmed) though. Pteron 21:45, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, since it looks like the consensus will be to keep, I've moved it to Alec (Charmed). Niteowlneils 21:46, 25 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Talk:The Russians Are Coming the Russians Are Coming

message: Do you have a picture of the logo?? I saw on the Ya page that it says "R" instead of "R"?? 66.245.73.162 22:00, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The movie title in the opening credits uses a Ya (reversed 'R') and a reversed 'N' in "Russians", also a hammer and sickle for the 'G' in "Coming".  BMJ-pdx (talk) 23:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This states that this article is "within the scope of WikiProject Cape Cod and the Islands". Cape Ann, the ostensible location of this film, is on the north shore. It is not remotely near Cape Cod or the Islands (e.g. Martha's Vineyard, or Nantucket).68.183.25.78 (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: yeaa, speaking of location... the aerial view of Noyo Harbor?? the bridge span will be the same one seen in the movie "Overboard", only from below, at water's edge.. as Dean tells Anne about the... well you know. 2602:304:CDAF:A3D0:D9D8:2D32:7735:C134 (talk) 19:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: "It was one of the few American films of the time to portray the Russians in a positive light."
This is an outwardly likely but still curious assertion. Consider that after 1960, almost all spy movies portrayed the Russians as, at worst, rivals of whom to be wary. They were almost never the villains. Though this film was still unusual for presenting the Russians quite this positively, so there is a matter of degree. Random noter (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinematic presentations of the Russians in the Cold War 

message: Who plays Agnes Grilk, the lady who drives the motorcyle (with sidecar)?  IMDb shows no one in that role.  She is shown in a sequence starting at 0:40:39, then again at 0:49:56 and 0:54:37 (times per 'vlc' player).  BMJ-pdx (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who plays Agnes, motorcycle lady? 

message: Although the title of this film is sometimes rendered with a comma in the middle, there is no comma in the poster appended to the infobox, nor is there a comma in the title as seen in the film's on-screen opening credits. There is also no comma in the film's title as it appears in four of the five film databases listed under The Russians Are Coming the Russians Are Coming#External links. Thus the comma has been deleted today from this article's main title header. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: No comma within the title
Talk:Lutheran Church – Canada

message: I have added some new material and sources. With people's permission, could the "stub" designation be removed now, or is the article still shortish? - Ken Eckert  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keneckert (talk • contribs) 12:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  rewrite 

message: Has the new President been installed yet? Can this info be changed when he has please.
Greetings from a member of the LCAustralia! Sem boy (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church President 

message: Regarding this recent reversion, I'm wondering for which information you are seeking a reliable source. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain why you wanted to make the changes you proposed.  For each change, make sure there is a reliable source that backs it up. If you believe it is explained and sourced in the article, please quote from the relevant part of the article.  --David Tornheim (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did you look at the edit in question? What new information (other than my updating the official website URL) is there for which I could possibly provide a source? 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can't find a reliable source, then you can't make the change.  WP:SECONDARY, WP:INDEPENDENT sources are generally preferable.  Please read WP:RS.  --David Tornheim (talk) 05:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Only new information requires a reliable source; Wikignoming does not. Can you give me an example of what in that edit you are wanting sourced, ? 207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion
Talk:Third Way (UK organisation)

message: Was O.S. Tillett a TW candidate in London East constituency ? 89.80.171.46 22:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: EP Election 1994

message: I think so. It took a while to convince myself of this, during which I found:
* The Electoral Commission Register (use the registration search) shows this party registered which is called "National Liberal Party - True Liberalism" and has the alternative name "National Liberal Party Ulster Third Way". The "Ulster Third Way" was registered as a distinct party between 2001 and 2005.
* The logo on the EC register matches leaflet, so they're standing in this year's election.
* The EC says it registered in 1999, which doesn't match the introduction to this page. But that's ok because 1999 is the earliest date anyone registered with the EC.
* The people in the leaflet and on the EC register don't match anyone listed in this page. But these things change.
--h2g2bob (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the 3rd way the same as National Liberal Party
Talk:Ernst Haeckel

message: Why is this page identical to http://www.yourencyclopedia.net/Ernst_Haeckel.html ?
:Since Wikipedia is licensed under the GNU FDL, anyone may duplicate its contents. Many websites have copied Wikipedia material wholesale, often annoyingly stealing link precedence (since Wikipedia tends to be slower and less stable, because it is still being edited). Anyway, that page is one such - you can read the GNU FDL disclaimer (as required by the license) at the bottom, as well as an attribution to Wikipedia. Graft 16:10, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Copyrighted Material 

message: I am removing this section because 1) the article the person posted is in German, 2) the person put their own opinion on it.Goferwiki 09:42, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is what was in the article "*Ernst Haeckel did forge. Many of his pictures of organisms simply are inventions to prove his theory... Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, (Source: German weekly DIE ZEIT 22/2003 Wir Deutschen sind nicht moralisch höher stehend [])" Unacceptable Goferwiki 09:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Reference Section

message: The text currently states:
:"Haeckel claimed the origin of humanity was to be found in Asia: he believed that Hindustan (Indian subcontinent) was the actual location where the first humans had evolved. Haeckel argued that humans were closely related to the primates of Southeast Asia and rejected Darwin's hypothesis of Africa."
Haeckel actually wrote this, in his Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte (1868):
:
(English translation: 
:"Rather, most signs point to southern Asia. But also perhaps Eastern Africa has been the place where primeval man first emerged from humanlike apes; also perhaps a continent that has now sunk beneath the surface of the Indian Ocean, which stretched from the south of what is now Asia, on one side east to the Sunda Islands and on the other side west to Madagascar and Africa.")
To me, this reads more like Haeckel was hedging his bet, rather than that he rejected Darwin's hypothesis of Africa.  --Lambiam 11:28, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asia hypothesis
Talk:Calarabi

message: We obviously have a lack of information here. As far as I can gather calarabi is an ethnic food eaten on special occasions in areas like Norway. Prehaps calarabi is normally known under a diffrent name. Can anyone verifiy this information or provide some specifics? - Tsynergy 23:07, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to be a misspelling of kohlrabi. I can't find any mention of it in Merriam Webster's Collegiate, Webster's Third, the Random House Unabridged, or the Encyclopaedia Britannica. —Bkell 09:12, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, having dug through what little can be googled on it.  Let's redirect it. WormRunner | Talk 04:24, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Adams

message: *Donald Adams
----
(1) I do not know what the above is supposed to be. Why mention that man here on the talk page?
(2) I do not think Adams is a classic disambiguation page, and so I do not understand why there is a disambiguation notice: The list of links clearly shows that there are no misleading links whatsoever. <KF> 07:07, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrorist victims

message: This persists in a large cut from this page. I have discussed this matter in several places on the site with User:JHunterJ (his talk page, pages associated with the AfD he has placed on Allen (surname), and the general issue on the talk page at WP:MOSDAB. This should be enough to persuade anyone that the large cuts here are contentious. Charles Matthews 12:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the "cut" with a link to the list of people by name Adams, and that took place before much of the discussion you cite, which is still ongoing, of course.  I have not changed any other surname pages since and won't until the discussion is done (if then). -- JHunterJ 12:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, it interests me.  And thanks to these discussions I'm now aware of some of the reasons, but I still do not understand your recasting WP:BOLD actions as policy wonkiness or cubicle mentality. -- JHunterJ 17:02, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert by [[User:JHunterJ]]
Talk:Wanda Landowska

message: why is it not mentioned that her escape from France was made possible by the efforts of Varian Fry? - (unsigned)
*Because no one who knows about it has written it there yet. If you do, why not add it to the article? - Nunh-huh 01:48, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Varian Fry

message: This is a free encyclopedia.  We are not exploiting her estate to use it in a benign fashion.  It is fitting to have a photo of the grand artist.  She passed away nearly a century ago.  Can we not just let the issue sit, until a challenge arises? Dogru144 02:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo removal

message: The emphasized phrase in the sentence below was removed as a statement of personal opinion (as well as for being clumsily expressed):
:"They have largely fallen out of fashion in the past four decades, and have done much to harm the modern appreciation of Landowska's recordings."
It may be so that  Landowska's use of such instruments has had an adverse impact on contemporary appreciation of her recordings - but no source for this is cited, no quote from a standard authority or standard work is given. As to expression, it wouldn't be the modern harpsichords themselves that did the harm, it would be her use of them in the recordings. JTGILLICK (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of an unsupported/uncredited/unreferenced opinion

message: Was Landowska ever an American citizen?
She was certainly not "of Polish descent". She was Polish-born and -bred.
65.206.122.30 (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: American of Polish Descent??

message: The term as used today strongly implies a romantic relationship. Is this intended, and is there any evidence? If not, probably best to rephrase this.
Jrgsf 19:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "Domestic Partner Denise Restout"

message: Apparently, the Polish article has 1877 as the correct date of birth. Although I don't see this referenced somehow, I wonder which is the correct one. --Chrysalifourfour (talk) 12:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: the harpsichord featuring in the image titled "Wanda Landowska in 1937" is (or at least appears on closer inspection) the same harpsichord that features in image titled "A favourite 16th-century Landowska harpsichord from her collection, with painting on lid attributed to Verocchio, presently housed in Hans Adler memorial music collection." 124.171.64.159 (talk) 10:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The two harpsichords pictured in the article today are obviously completely different styles in almost every way. I assume the first picture shows her actual performance harpsichord, with its extra bass octave and variety of plucking materials. So much needs to be researched to make the WP article truly encyclopedic. 22:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  same harpsichord
Talk:Oyo

message: The information reverted:
It host Ajayi Crowther University Oyo. Sport: Oyo has a 10,000 capacity stadium 
Television station in Oyo include NTA Oyo., Hotels in Oyo iclude Labamba Hotel Complex''
doesn't indeed seem to have much to do with the main article, but is the contributor perhaps talking about a place called Oyo? (presumably not the one in Congo, but I don't know) Adding information about TV stations, stadiums and universities doesn't look like vandalism, so is there some misunderstanding going on? Martijn faassen 00:59, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled