Talk:Pete McCloskey

message: Why isn't the law suit the ADL had to settle with McCloseky in this entry? https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=JW19981127.2.9&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------
--- 
An edit I made was retracted by another user as being a violation of the NPOV policy.  That's not the case.   The current article reads as if the quote taken from the IHR conference was entirely wrong and somehow substantively changed the reason why this is a controversy.  I will make the edit again.  If it is removed, I will ask that we get someone to help mediate this NPOV dispute, and failing that, look into wikipedia arbitration for this.  
Finally, I'd like to note that this is actually a peculiar example of NPOV being raised in a systematic and decidedly non-neutral way. The same person is, with bias, policing the CNI link: first truncating any elaboration on CNI's relationship with the controversy in that entry with a "see McCloskey" remark (while removing pertinent material in CNI's entry about the organization's response to this incident), and then deleting material under the McCloskey entry.  i.e.: First "this is better handled under McCloskey" and then deleting material here.  
This is the first time I've done editing on these pages, and I was rather amazed at: 1. How quickly the user responded, and 2. How prolific the user has been in removing material in these entries.  I would like to mediate this to see if we can come to a mutual agreement on a full account of why this has been a controversy and so that readers of these entries can get as full and non-biased (as possible) text.  But, i'll frankly say this looks like a textbook case of an organization having someone police their wikipedia publicity, and I'll opt for arbitration if it appears that the interest in seeing a full and accurate entry isn't a shared motive.  p.s. I'll go ahead and register a wikipedia user name to help with tracking this discussion and dispute. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.140.157.18 (talk • contribs)  .
What you call "elaboration" is baldfaced violation of WP policy, as you should know if you'd read the documentation I'd linked for you. You inserted "CNI did not, at the time of McCloskey's speech, nor at any point later (while McCloskey served on the CNI board), distance itself from its founder and board member's decision to be the keynote speaker for the Holocaust denial group."  That violates WP:OR. What if CNI did distance itself in some newspaper article that you happened to miss?    Even if you say you have done careful enough research to announce with certainty that CNI never distanced itself from the IHR speech, why should Wikipedians believe YOU?  Next time you add such statements, make sure you have reliable sources for them. Please keep your personal opinions out of the articles and keep your ad hominem attacks out of the talk pages.  You'll be well advised to familiarize yourself with WP policy before further editing. Precis 23:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit retracted

message: The succession dates are wrong.  Leo Ryan succeeded him in the 11th district in 1973, while McCloskey served in two other district numbers until he left office in 1983. 161.185.150.122 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession 

message: :Image:Pete McCloskey.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pete McCloskey.jpg

message: Sued for libel by Pat Robertson who lost his case. -Sparky (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The long block quotation(?) with preface "His book "The Taking of Hill 610" put an end to Pat Robertson's 1988 Presidential run." seems to be inserted out of place. No source is given, but layout implies quotation. --P64 (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Libel?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pete McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929062753/http://tracypress.com/content/view/8874/2/ to http://tracypress.com/content/view/8874/2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pete McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090623025507/http://sphs.spusd.net:80/ourpages/athletics/hall_of_fame/baseball.jsp?rn=6250458 to http://sphs.spusd.net/ourpages/athletics/hall_of_fame/baseball.jsp?rn=6250458
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101101113104/http://openvault.wgbh.org:80/catalog/org.wgbh.mla:0566c373c7250294e2bf55eddcf9f2da18834453 to http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/org.wgbh.mla:0566c373c7250294e2bf55eddcf9f2da18834453
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070419144806/http://www.cctextra.com:80/blogs/politicsblog/2007/04/mccloskey_leaves_republican_pa.html to http://www.cctextra.com/blogs/politicsblog/2007/04/mccloskey_leaves_republican_pa.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070419144806/http://www.cctextra.com:80/blogs/politicsblog/2007/04/mccloskey_leaves_republican_pa.html to http://www.cctextra.com/blogs/politicsblog/2007/04/mccloskey_leaves_republican_pa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Pete McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/org.wgbh.mla:0566c373c7250294e2bf55eddcf9f2da18834453
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060624044224/http://petemccloskey.com/press/story02_20_06A.html to http://www.petemccloskey.com/press/story02_20_06A.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cctextra.com/blogs/politicsblog/2007/04/mccloskey_leaves_republican_pa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 1953 can't be right… right? — iFaqeer (talk to or email me) 16:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Great Grandfather's Immigration 

message: Any sources to back up this trending tweet? ~ AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 19:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he dead?