Talk:Born Rich (2003 film)

message: The "Luke Weil" link is a bit odd - it references the same Born Rich article. Tried to search for him and still ended up with the same article.
I would do something about this if I only knew how.
:Please sign your comments, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andreas_Toth I presume. The Luke Weil link is to a review of the Born Rich movie, featuring a quick take on Mr. Weil's futile attempts to block the documentary's exhibit. 12.54.189.122 (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luke Weil Link 

message: Someone is adding "Taylor Plant" (as far as I can tell a fictitious name) to the list of individuals interviewed in the film.  I have removed it, but "Taylor Plant" may reappear.
:Someone seems to be adding it to a lot of other articles as well, including Scuderia Ferrari. The359 05:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taylor Plant 

message: :Image:BornRich PH611386 lg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BornRich PH611386 lg.jpg

message: Per Wikipedia:External_links:
:::Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be placed in the body of an article.
And furthermore, those external links aren't to the subject itself, they're to the actors who are in the film. This violates further number 11 in Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided:
:::Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I tagged the article as refimprove because the first two main sections have few, if any, sources. If this movie is notable enough, which it seems it is, then it should have more secondary WP:RS sources to verify these paragraphs.--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref Improve 

message: Please keep in mind that IMDB is not a valid reference for wikipedia, because it is crowdsourced. Please find a reference coming from directly Emmy or from a reliable news source. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmy awards refs 

message: I think we should combine these two statements:
* Other participants in the film claimed to have been convinced to participate under the same "false pretenses" but Johnson denied that he had "tricked" anyone.
* Reports before and at the time of the film's release stated that other participants were also unhappy about their depiction in the film.
Does anyone agree? How should we do it?--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 17:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combining statements in history