lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emily Young

message: This article is less than 3 hours old and is still marked as a "stub". Before overzealous wikipedians mark it for deletion for unfounded reasons ("db-spam"? come on!), they should consider the fact that it covers a revered British sculptors of the 20th century, who has links with famous people. If you don't like the style or formatting of the article, you can modify it freely. No threats please. Thanks. -- Hugo Dufort 01:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is still a stub

message: If somebody could find a photo of an album's cover by the Penguin Cafe Orchestra (designed by Emily Young), it would fit nicely in the "Early Life" section. But most importantly, we need a photo of one of her sculptures!!! Hugo Dufort 02:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This might be legally tricky; sculptures are covered under copyright law, and Emily Young is most definitely still alive. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  But on further reflection I might be able to help with that. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  NB when I say "help with that" I mean "help with the image", not "help with Emily Young being still alive". I've stuck in a picture originally of Salisbury Cathedral, but it has too much scaffolding and the lunar disc draws attention away from the building. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images, etc.

message: Has been in Tuscany since about 2010:
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/emily-young-from-rock-muse-to-stone-sculptor-8822572.html
Thirteenangrymen (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Now living in Italy

message: Please forgive a question that I know shouldn't be discussed here, but I was just wondering if anyone had any idea of how much Young's torso sculptures sell for? I just don't know where to find this information. Any links to any articles reporting sales would be appreciated...don't worry wiki-tyrants, I will delete this as soon as possible! :) 86.180.107.185 (talk) 23:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost?
Talk:It's Flashbeagle, Charlie Brown

message: One reference is just a small part, and the other one is dead. - Redmess 09:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Was this page vandalized or was "Flashbeagle" really that bad?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.70.200 (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably both. It really was that bad. HalfShadow 00:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Poisoned Brandy

message: I put their alias credit names, so that Wikipedia doesn't revert them. They can be found on imdb.com.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.252.211.83 (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice Credits
Talk:Miloud Hadefi Stadium

message: I don't see how this article fits the crystal ball description.  There are plenty of other buildings, including sports stadiums, that won't be completed in more years than 3 that have articles.  I don't see how this should stadium fails that.  Patken4 01:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Friedman Unit

message: The expression "tongue-in-cheek" is colloquial and may not be clear to most readers who learned English as a second language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.247.247.239 (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: tongue-in-cheek now wikilinked. 24.151.50.173 (talk) 21:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expression 

message: There appears to be some citation overkill for an article this size. I realize that some of this might have to do with the editing that occurred during deletion discussion in 2007, but it might be worth paring down the number of references. Barkeep Chat | $ 19:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation overkill 

message: It's simply bizarre that this article doesn't link back to Duncan Black (Atrios) .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3756:180:746D:AC81:FDA3:AE58 (talk) 07:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: 24.151.10.165 (talk) 15:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 

message: I just did a google search on this term.
"Friedman Unit" 6680 hits - The term
"Friedman Unit" + "is a" 3840 hits - Defining the term
So to be generous, after 9 years, the term has been actively used in 2840 places. In other words, it's an obscure term that few people actually use. Isn't it time to delete this from Wikipedia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.191.185.2 (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nine years later...
Talk:The Shaw Group

message: If I'm not mistaken, the Shaw Center for the Arts is affiliated with The Shaw Group... so I added a link in "see also." QueenStupid 01:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I got some info, and I added it... QueenStupid 05:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Now that the company has been acquired by CB&I it is no longer public and no longer listed - the article needs to be updated accordingly.--ukexpat (talk) 17:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating
Talk:El Centro Cultural de Mexico

message: This article does noting but reproduce - word for word - text from the organization's own website. Not terribly objective. I was considering adding "Citation Needed" tags but frankly, that's not really the problem. While it may technically be a Biography, it is more an autobiography because it is a reproduction of the organization's own literature.
Kholya (talk) 21:51, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Farm Labor Organizing Committee

message: In par.2 of the Campbell's Soup boycott section the John Dunlop quote is used twice. Is this intentional, or just a typo?--Bookandcoffee 17:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate quote

message: Please stop removing sourced statements from this article. If the statement is wrong, you need to find a verifiable published source which says differently.  Then you need to change the article to reflect the fact that sources disagree over whether FLOC established this program or not.  Wikipedia's guidelines on this are very, very clear. - Tim1965 (talk) 13:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing sourced statements 
Talk:Will Clarke (novelist)

message: About that external links tag: The New York Times articles require registration to view, which makes them links to be discouraged, according to this Wikipedia guide. If there are comparable useful free-to-view articles out there, please link to those instead. If these pages are actually references used in writing this wiki article, please mark them as such. Fleebo 01:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brewster's Millions (1985 film)

message: Richard Corliss's review in Time magazine is inaccessible unless one is a subscriber.  Can anyone who has a log-in take a look at it and add some quotes from his review.  The ref. template was already in the reception section
:
but I removed it, as it is pointless to have a ref. with no content. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Corliss review 

message: There's been a bit of a disagreement about whether the production/location details should be included in this article, as added here.  has removed it partially because of "inadequate refs". The included reference is from the LA Times which I would say is sufficient. Please discuss (politely) here, as I would like to see a reason for it not being included. violet/riga [talk] 21:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Times article looked irrelevant at first glance, because it was all about the baseball park being demolished.  A second look showed a brief mention of Brewster's Millions being filmed there, so I restored it. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 14:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production/location details
Talk:Elongated dodecahedron

message: Removed statement just added: Unclear what the "symmeties" are, and not a very useful die with unequal face areas. Tom Ruen 01:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has 12 faces,over 120 symetries,and can be used as a 12 sided dice in board games.
I added that it has D4h symmetry, which looks like order 16 symmetries. Tom Ruen 02:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I a almost certain that a rhombic dodecahedron is the Wigner-Seitz cell for a *face centered* cubic lattice.  Every lattice point in a FCC lattice has 12 nearest neighbors, so the Wigner-Seitz cell should have 12 faces.  Every point in a BCC lattice has eight nearest neighbors and six second-nearest neighbors, and the Wigner-Seitz construction produces a truncated octahedron.  Maybe the original author was thinking of Brillouin zones, which are Wigner-Seitz cells in reciprocal space.
--Pciszek 04:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I create the stub but I can't judge that addition. Tom Ruen 04:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  An old discussion, but your logic is correct for rhombic dodecahedron. However, this is the page for the elongated dodecahedron, not the ordinary dodecahedron. Because it's elongated, it's the Wigner-Seitz cell of the body-centered tetragonal lattice, not body-centered cubic lattice. Body-centered cubic and face-centered cubic are different lattices, but the face-centred tetragonal lattice is identical to the body-centered tetragonal lattice, so the article is actually correct. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 02:09, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wigner-Seitz cell for a body-centered cubic lattice? 

message: The drawings of this shape here are inaccurate: the four hexagon-hexagon edges are drawn shorter than the other edges. One might argue that it's something to do with perspective, but no: in the perspective shown, these edges should if anything appear slightly longer than the other edges, because they're perpendicular to the direction of projection and the others aren't. Any chance of a fix? —David Eppstein (talk) 02:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate drawing
Talk:Daniel Guggenheim

message: This page still needs work -- I haven't yet worked out Daniel's Kennecott Copper exploits. More soon...  Pete Tillman 01:53, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work
Talk:Higo Ko-ryu

message: Hello. Should I interpret "koryu" of "Higo Ko-ryu" as a proper noun in English? If it has been a general noun, the article name will change to "Higo koryū". --Nightshadow28 13:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Current title "Higo Ko-ryu" matches how the sources (Amdur's book and koryu.com website) spell it. jni (delete)...just not interested 16:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Talk:Fink (singer)

message: These two articles are exactly the same - We should just use this page to poin to the band. Markco1 01:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hontai Yōshin-ryū

message: It needs cleanup, no point in pressing in as many links as possible. Other than that the article needs a scale-down on the CAPS used for names. My thoughts. Fred26 04:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many links 
Talk:Eye dropper

message: Should this be merged or at least linked to the main pipette article?
Feyandstrange 09:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done via "Main article" hatnote -- Jo3sampl (talk) 23:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main article 

message: Who invented the eyedropper/pipette? When? Thanks -- Jo3sampl (talk) 23:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I have never heard the term "Pasteur pipette" used in real life. It's always called an "eye dropper" in the US at least. I am going to propose a name change and a slight rewording of the lead sentence to match. -Arch dude (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and the move was done. -Arch dude (talk) 05:00, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Should this be
 renamed to Eye dropper",
?
Talk:Kage-ryū

message: "The Tokugawa shogunate standardized the size of swords in Japan to jo-sun. This is written as tei-sun meaning designated length. This was 2 shaku 3 sun (64.7 cm)."
This is definitely true and it is obvious that this definitely had consequences of some kind for the ryūha. But just mentioning the law and not reflecting it on the school answers nothing. One can rather delete this sentence then, as it is holds no information about what happened with Kage Ryū in those days. 
Was it an "otome ryū", meaning it was exempt from those laws as it was the school of the body guards of some daimyō? Or did they continue practicing the old way clandestine? Or did it comply and use regular swords from that day on, until somewhere in more modern times, they decided to restore the old methods? Kennin (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Mayumi Thyme

message: Is Mayumi the same age as Rin and everyone else. Because, how long have the demons/gods been open to humans? If Mayumi is half-demon and she is in high-school then that would require her being born atleast fourteen years prior to SHUFFLE!. But from what I've read the gate opening the god and demon realms (are they separate realms) were open to humans 10 years prior to SHUFFLE!. -- Psi edit 20:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We know that at least one person (Ama) came to the human world by accident before that, so why not somebody else? 71.203.209.0 03:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question.
Talk:Cù-sìth

message: I've removed this, tagged as unsourced since Jan 2008:
"The forest dwelling tribes of the Fife and the east coast were known as Cu Sìth during Roman times, for their ability to launch ambush attacks then disappear into the forests like 'Fairy Hounds'. The south of Fife has long been associated with societies of 'dog people'. The name of the town of Kincardine is derived from the Pictish for 'woodland of the dogs'. Nearby Culross mean 'headland of the dogs'.
I'm truly curious - well, sort of... - as to what the Roman-period source for the "forest dwelling" "Cu Sìth" might be! Enaidmawr (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fife, Dog People, etc. 

message: just might want to mention somewere in the article that this is the same animal that is used in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Hound of Baskerville...(ANOMALY-117 (talk) 14:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. The Black dog (ghost) yes, but not the HOTB, please, that's a *literary* fictional character. Akerbeltz (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  hound of baskerville 

message: I am removing the Etymology section, which states very unequivocally that the "sìth" in "cù sìth" has no etymological relation to the mound/barrow meaning of "sídhe". Not only is no source given, it is in direct contradiction with the etymology given on the main Aos Sí article.
Ojh2 (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Dip (Catalan myth)

message: I can't read Catalan, but can someone who can translate the Catalan entry into English do so? 24.14.198.8 01:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interpret

message: Count Estruc
Count Estruc is a vampire legend in North Catalonia(Spain).
This is the first European Legend of Nosferatus or non deads. There is a book, published in Spain, dedicated to this Vampire, ESTRUCH written by Salvador Sáinz, published in 1991, and something shorts storys also writes for the same author: ESTRUC'S RING, ESTRUC'S GUEST, STRIGOÏACA, ESTRUC'S DAUGHTERS....
Estruc (in the actuality this name is called Estruch) alive in Llers (France frontier with Spain) in 1173. Don Guifred Estruch is a old knight, he battle the pagan rites and is killed. The count return to live another time, but now is a vampyr. One bloody vampyr. Many years this non dead, this nosferatu afraid the catalonian village and ending destroyed for one old nun.--Fausto50 (talk) 20:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another vampire legend in Spain
Talk:El Centro de la Raza

message: Roberto Maestas probably deserves an article of his own, or a much-expanded section here. Right now it's a redirect. - Jmabel | Talk 05:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, just finding this page and 8 years later, definitely agree!  Maestas looks like a notable figure in the pacific northwest latino civil rights history. Depthdiver (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

text: The page overall needs a fair bit of work, am making a start adding references.  Hope others will help :-) Depthdiver (talk) 01:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberto Maestas
Talk:Milagro (theatre)

message: Since I have made edits to this page before, it may be useful to know that I am now engaged to be married to a major staff member of this theater.  I will avoid any controversial edits and invite other editors to scrutinize my edits closely for bias. Msalt (talk) 02:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure of Potential Conflict of Interest 
Talk:List of active Royal New Zealand Navy ships

message: I have been trying to add auxiliary vessels that contribute directly to the RNZN operational outputs.  They have been removed on the basis that they are "NOT SHIPS"  - with all due respect if we are going to strictly refer to "SHIPS" then the Inshore Patrol Craft must be removed.   I would like feedback from other contributors on the issue.  In my view excluding the Auxiliary craft distorts the overall picture that the page is seeking to portray which is the overall operational capability of the RNZN.
Cheers
MightyMoa (talk) 08:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a matter of balance. You seem to be nitpicking. The vessels that are listed are significant commissioned vessels that have their own Wikipedia articles. I doubt any other navy would want little 7 tonne launches listed on Wikipedia as part of their fleet, so it makes the New Zealand navy appear a bit ridiculous. The next step would be to add lifeboats and dinghies. --Epipelagic (talk) 08:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand where you are coming from a bit better now.   However your last comments regarding life boats are ridiculous and misses the point I was trying to emphasize "contribution to operational capability" which is different for a small navy like the RNZN, than say the US Navy or even the Danish Navy. While you refer to 7 tonne vessels you forgot the 2 x 55 tonne landing craft. As for the point that it makes the RNZN look ridiculous then I suggest the Royal Netherlands Navy, Belgium Navy Wikipedia Pages don't make them look that great either.   I'm not going to bother adding the craft back in unless other users support it. MightyMoa (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auxiliary Vessels 

message: Not sure how to add her, as she is now commissioned https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMNZS_Manawanui_(2019)  She is class as a DHV a "Dive and Hydrographic Vessel"
HMNZS Aotearoa will be commissioned next year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMNZS_Aotearoa_(A12) some will need to remember to add her as well...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.38.207 (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  HMNZS Manawanui III & HMNZS Aotearoa 
Talk:Keelut

message: Is there any difference big enough that would make it impractical to merge them into one article (e.g. Inuit Dog Spirits)? Because both are stubs that say pretty much the same thing --24.64.116.157 (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems like the [[Qiqirn]]... 

message: There's not very much out there at least under this spelling. So far I've found only the Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology (1935), p. 436. VERY short entry. "Keelut: An earth spirit, looking like a hairless dog. Evil.” Sgallison (talk) 18:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any more sources?
Talk:List of ships of the Royal New Zealand Navy

message: Some of the patrol vessel class is wrong. The modern IPV's are not known as Protector class, they are known as Lake Class IPV's
Example, from NZ Navy's website. And if they don't know the class of their vessels who does?
Patrol Force: HMNZS ROTOITI is a Lake-class inshore patrol vessel of the Royal New Zealand Navy. It is one of the Navy's four Inshore Patrol Vessels (IPVs). 
http://navy.mil.nz/mtf/rotoiti/default.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2406:5A00:D8E9:B800:A4A9:18E9:19F4:CAC2 (talk) 03:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Class of Vessels

message: Your list has three vessels listed under Pennant Number (T12). HMNZS Humphrey is (T06) and HMNZS Futurist is (T09). Only HMNZS Coastguard should be isted as (T12). 174.99.117.158 (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections to Pennant Numbers
Talk:Gávea

message: The one shown in the photo is not Gavea, it is Sao Conrado neighborhood. And there is no such a beach as mentioned in the caption of the photo. (Praia da Gavea) By Max Birsa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2800:355:2:899:EC54:659:15ED:1068 (talk) 21:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

message: The text below was moved from the article to this talk page because it is unsourced and POV. --Carioca 02:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved text
Talk:Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran

message: wow. this article is poorly written and not easily understood. Randomfrenchie 02:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Their is no mention of the Council of Guardians, the Assembly of Experts is mentioned in passing, and I forget but there is one more executive committee. It fails to mention the president is merely an effective political barrier for the leadership. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.27.73.169 (talk) 05:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The executive section is lacking 
Talk:Robin Hood's Delight

message: From the guidelines (WP:SINGLE):
A song is definitely notable if it meets any one of the following standards.
. . .
4. Is a folk song, hymn or Christmas carol with a documented history of more than fifty years''
This one is more like more than a hundred years, as it's a Child ballad.  Anyone know a good way to sidle that in?   (BTW, "Child ballad 136" describes its index, like "Beethoven's Sixth Symphony".  We certainly want the exact phrase in the lede.  Goldfritha 02:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability