lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Road Warriors

message: I added the fact that Animal no longers uses animal and is solely going by the roadwarrior Danrduggan 13:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: how about there wrestling moves being listed? Prince Bee 12:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moves 

message: "Generally recognized as the greatest tag team in professional wrestling history" - Very POV.  We definitely need some citations to back this up!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Infinitum (talk • contribs) 22:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Greatest 

message: The "Legion of Doom" it could be argued had several members over the years, but the actual Road Warriors tag team was simply Road Warrior Hawk and Road Warrior Animal - there was never a "Road Warrior Heidenreich" for example.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.202.168 (talk) 23:25, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: However, there was "Power Warrior", so your example is invalid. It's best to keep it together because they seemed to have expanded, not become a new group altogether. srsrox BlahBlahBlah... 12:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: There only was TWO Road Warriors

message: Bundy was never a member of the Legion of Doom. Paul Ellering made Ron Garvin go through Bundy in order to get a shot at the TV title held by LOD member Jake Roberts. Ellering insulted Bundy while on TV, and stated he wasn't a member when asked by Gordon Solie. Bundy jumped Ellering and became a face for rest of his Georgia run. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTZPe0sRPYk&feature=youtu.be&t=1260 NWAjr. (talk) 23:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Kong Bundy 

message: It should be noted that WhatCulture is not deemed an Pro Wrestling reliable source. Please don't add information that is unsourced, or sourced by unreliable sources. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:12, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:RS]] 

message: They showed up at Clash 24 (August 93) in WCW as Dustin Rhodes’ tag partners. Hawk wrestled, Animal was in their corner. Zero mention of this in the article. 2601:281:D480:2FE4:94E4:994F:BF61:C605 (talk) 02:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clash of the Champions 24 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  00:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Road Warriors →  – Per WP:THE. McPhail (talk) 09:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: No comments - relisting Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 12:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Support, and to be honest there are a lot of other pro wrestling articles that need "The" removing from their titles. — Czello (music) 13:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 June 2023
Talk:Yuan-Cheng Fung

message: \sigma+\beta=exp(\alpha[\lambda-1])
Improvement in Fung's law description.
-Rudolf.Hellmuth  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rudolf.hellmuth (talk • contribs) 22:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Math

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 20:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Echo

message: Shouldn't this either be the main page for Echo (with an Echo (disambiguation) page) or the tag changed to Echo (acoustic), as phenomenon is rather undescriptive? ~ trialsanderrors 08:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe ogg is used because it is open source (public domain) and does not require a licensing fee. It is used in other places on Wikipedia.Dmine45 18:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title

message: The article states:
:The actual reason for the myth is that the wave of a duck's quack is almost identical to an echo. It echoes, but it is not very obvious.
This makes no sense. An echo "wave" is almost identical to the sound that is being echoed (which is why it's called an "echo"). So any sound will be practically identical to its echo sound. | Loadmaster (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it makes no sense. AFAIK, a duck's quack can most certainly echo if there's a surface for the sound to bounce off of--the probable reason for the myth is that there often was no such surface. Binksternet (talk) 02:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duck quack
Talk:IBM ROMP

message: I read an online article some years ago that said the ROMP was initially prototyped using discrete components, then once it was functionally stable, the circuitry was converted to a single silicon die.
Try that with a present day microchip.
Actually, there were two prototypes.  One was a functional equivalent, for software development.  The second was node-equivalent, with a net for every gate output on the chip, for verification.  The latter took around 16 boards of 384 modules each.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.66.189 (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Prototyping
Talk:Carroll A. Campbell Jr.

message: I have reverted the edit including Campbell in the American University alumni Category. Neither the article or any of the existing external links indicate that he attended American University. If in fact he did attend American University, please mention it in the article text, cite a verifiable source, and then re-include him in the category. --TommyBoy 08:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: American University alumni
Talk:Francis Buchanan-Hamilton

message: According to H J Noltie, he was born in Bardowie. Someone with the geographic knowledge, please fix the location information. Shyamal 09:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pinning ceremony (nursing)

message: May I suggest that more information is added to get this article in context. I think it may be a US thing so perhaps that can be verified to start with. --Vincej 09:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I may be wrong, but don't other groups having pinning ceremonies, like the Navy? BethEnd (talk) 03:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just nurses?

message: you may want to use this image from my article about Schwester Selma: :File:PikiWiki Israel 4817 Shaare Zedek Hospital (cropped).jpg. (I need to learn how to crop off the border. -- I did it!) Yoninah (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Great suggestion, ! I just added it in the "History" section. Thanks so much! Michael Barera (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic image

message: As mentioned in a previous post, nurses are not the only ones with pinning ceremonies. I added a Commons category which shows members of the armed forces being pinned. I suggest you add a new section at the end called "Other uses" and mention these military pinning ceremonies, with a cite. Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would make more sense to move this article to "pinning ceremony (nursing)" and create a separate article for "pinning ceremony (military)". Michael Barera (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK. But the page is about to go live on the main page. Let's wait another 12 hours and then move the page. Yoninah (talk) 10:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like a plan, . Let's do that. Michael Barera (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Other pinning ceremonies
Talk:Singlet state

message: could this page also mention isosinglet? --MarSch 09:32, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The page mentions four different topics, three of them one-line sentences. This is adequate grounds for proposing a split into separate pages accessible from a disambigation page. However, three of those topics are barely more than one line long, so may not merit a separate page. --B.d.mills 02:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Well, SU(2) is not the rotation group. Is it the cyclic group SO(2) or the unitary group SU(2) --81.65.198.143 (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the rotation group SU(2) ??? 

message: I have cleaned up the discussion of the EPR paradox and mention of Bell's theorem a bit (adding a reference to Bohm who introduced the application of the singlet in this context!).  But perhaps this material should be shortened/summarized and reference made to the EPR paradox and Bell's theorem pages instead (moving material from this article into those articles if any of it provides additional useful discussion or clearer presentation of aspects of those topics).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MorphismOfDoom (talk • contribs) 18:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorten EPR discussion and cite the EPR article instead?
Talk:Rose (comics)

message: I have exactly no idea how to make things like "Bone" link to the articles on those entries. Can someone give me a hand with this?
I probably didn't do that right.
:I did some linkage, for any other links, you can just follow that example. We have some pretty detailed help pages on how to edit articles that you may find useful. -Dawson 19:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: a little help with links

message: Just made a minor edit to the "Characters" section of the page, changing "Veni-Yan-Cari" to "Veni-Yan". If I recall correctly, the Veni-Yan is the proper term for the holy men known later in the series' chronology as "Stick-eaters", while the term "Veni-Yan-Cari" refers only to the one individual who has sufficient ties to the Dreaming to fully awaken the Lord of the Locusts. -Langrall 12:30, 20 April 2008
if i remember right the "Veni-Yan-Cari" is thorn  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.174.114.56 (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veni-Yan vs. Veni-Yan-Cari
Talk:Yonemura

message: I am sorely tempted to rewrite this article as below, since I wonder whether all these Japanese surnames are really worth their own article in Wikipedia. And if they are, why aren't English, German, Italian (etc) surnames all worthy of their own?
Yonemura (米村) is yet another Japanese surname. Its story, while at first glance a seemingly trivial bit of information hardly worthy of its own article in Wikipedia, is actually a crucial and fascinating factoid because of its uniqueness due to its association with Japan; this is true for all the other Japanese surnames that have their own article in Wikipedia (English), which foreign surnames such as Smith, Schmidt, Shythe, etc., do not, which proves how interesting they are compared to Japanese surnames.
Composed of yone ("rice plant") and mura ("village"); Yonemura means —ready?—"rice village." Yeah, no kiddin.' Ain't that amazing? As you can see, Japanese surnames like Yonemura are unique in that they are formed in this manner only in Japan, making them a unique Japanese phenomenon even when viewed from a global perspective as interpreted by Japanese in a manner only Japanese can fathom, which probably has to do with Japan's unique four seasons that cannot be found anywhere else, such as England, France, Germany, Sweden, Finland, etc. 
The Yonemura surname is particuarly common in southern Japan, especially in Kumamoto Prefecture in on the island of Kyushu (the southern-most [in case you didn't notice that we already mentioned southern Japan; see two lines back] big island). In Brazil also there are lots of Yonemura, even though not many villages there grow rice. Most went to Brazil after World War II to search for new opportunities that were hardly found on in Japan.
Enough's enough! Jim_Lockhart 09:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously you do not see the purpose behind the foregoing. That aside, I assume that by Kumamoto Province, you mean Kumamoto Han/Higo Han, in which case, what you need to write is the area of the former Kumamoto Han or province. I'll fix the main article. Best regards, Jim_Lockhart 05:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Khojaly massacre/Archive 1

message: Many official figures are missing, and the "US State Department as the biggest civilian massacre in the world in 1992" is dubvious info at best, ater what happened in Algeria and Rwanda(three villages) that year. Adding POV Fadix 03:42, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The term Kojaly Genocide is used by no any other person than some ultra nationalist Azeris. Fadix 03:43, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Very good. We all believed you. You certainly aren't biased! Hakob 05:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Tabib, some Armenians? Tabib, I requested to provide evidences of the also called Khojali genocide, that some ultra nationalist Azeris called such to equal it with the Armenian genocide doesn't make of something as also called. Beside, the death range, there are works providing 150 as death range and most Western books don't provide any numbers, and as stated official Azeris sources also provide such figures as well as the first numbers presented the Helzenki Watch etc. Those are some examples on why I replaced that tag there. Also, which statistic talk about over a thousand? Until such issues are not covered and addressed there is no reason to remove that tag from there. Also, the reason why I have replaced the totallydisputed tag and not the POV tag is because what is said about the event is also wrong, the death range and what is called also a genocide is wrong. Cite your sources of any book, academic serious work published anywhere outside of Azerbaijan that call it such. Even Turkey that was to pass such a resolution finally decided to not do it. If you expect to make of this article a Wikipedia article and not use Wikipedia as an extention of your site(in which you call a genocide), you will address those issues first. Fad (ix) 21:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why it is totallydisputed?

message: This article has POV issues, and thus I am re adding the tag for the third time.  Until this POV is resolved, please don't remove the tag, thank you!--Moosh88 20:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain which POV issues the article has. Saying that it has POV issues is not enough, you need to properly substantiate the tag. Grandmaster 07:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

text: It does not. Memorial and HRW are not Azeris. The article reflects Armenian position as well. Grandmaster 06:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Hi, I've made a few edits, I hope that by and large they are not controversial. I've added a wikiquote see also, added a reference for the genocide thing, tidied up the external links. The controversial edit might be making a naming section. I'd like to see what the Armenians call it, along with the names in Azerbaijani of the massacre. I think that would benefit the page. I've also been searching for a way to split up the page a bit to avoid having a massive lead and then TOC then nothing. - FrancisTyers 11:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Steve Ogrizovic

message: I amended this from scored direct from a goal kick to from open play as it was a fly kick Ogrizovic scored from and not a goal kick.Statto74 (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Goal Kick

message: Does anyone remember another hoax regarding Ogrizovic. When asked the question 'who in the year 2000 had survived the Munich air disaster' and was still playing proffessional football, the answer was Steve Ogrizovic (Hoax). The rationale was that his mother was an air stewardess on the plane at the time and was pregnant with Steve. I had believed this for years until now I realised that Steve was born one year before the air disaster took place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.88.195.46 (talk) 19:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: e buena gente

message: Have amended the date from 1977 to 1978 as Peter McDonnell was the unused sub in 77, Oggy was on the bench in the first leg of the 1978 Super Cup and played in the second leg.Statto74 (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Super Cup

message: I have removed Sir Viv from his list of victims as although he clean bowled Richards, it was from a No Ball and didn't count!Statto74 (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Viv Richards
Talk:Key Decisions

message: In the goofs section it is noted that Gob's first time playing catch with his father possibly contradicts his being known as an adapt softball player:
"Both G.O.B.'s never having played catch with his father and his seeming lack of experience throwing a ball at the episode's end seems to be contradicted by season 2's Switch Hitter, in which not only he is the Bluth softball team's best player, but his father recognizes him as so."
I recommend deleting this due to the comment Michael makes to Gob near the end of Switch Hitter, "You finally got dad to one of your ball games."  This implies that Gob did in fact play soft/baseball independent of the company game but that George Sr. did not attend them.
--Demiansmark 10:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs
Talk:General Dynamics

message: In 2021, General Dynamics U.S. workforce was 21% veterans, 23% female, and 27% people of color. The US Department of Labor awarded the company the 2021 HIRE Vets Gold Award.
The company has 26 Employee Resource Groups serving 10 employee segments.
Approximately 20% of the company's employees are represented by labor unions such as International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM), The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW).
Independent research published by American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD), U.S. Department of Labor, Military Times, U.S. Veterans Magazine, Professional Women's Magazine, Forbes, and Fortune Magazine selected General Dynamics as a top employer. 
General Dynamics' community contributions in 2021 were 70% in Education & Social Services, 18% in Arts & Culture, and 12% in Service Member Support.
@User:Chefmikesf, do you have sources for the updates to acquisitions and divestitures? I don't think we can wipe out the existing section when it has more information. The article in general could use some reorganization and the history section in particular has a couple orange quality banners, open to improving those if you have any input or supporting references to share. - Indefensible (talk) 23:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Indefensible Thank you for the updates to the article! I noticed I added a version of the tables without references; sorry about that. I transferred the references to the tables. What do you think? The tables have the same information as the current section; I just cleaned up the formatting. Regarding the history section, I can begin collecting references for a conceptual update outline.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the review and update, let me take another look. - Indefensible (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Indefensible, did you have a chance to review the update? --Chefmikesf (talk) 19:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, have not been as active on Wiki recently, let me take a look again... - Indefensible (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I can reformat the acquisitions & divestitures into a table, but more concerned about the sections with orange quality banners like on the F-16. - Indefensible (talk) 01:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Indefensible Thanks for the help. Would you like me to add the reformatted tables? I agree those sections, including F-16, need a quality update. I'm open to working on those sections after collecting enough sources.-- Chefmikesf (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Demographics
Talk:Chris Woo

message: According to a link, a swimmer called Chris Woo made an Olympic final in the 100 metres breast stroke in 1976. I will rewrite the article about him. Capitalistroadster 10:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon
Category talk:Mountains of Europe

message: I dispute the inclusion, and indeed existence, of the following categories:
* :Category:Mountains of Belgium
* :Category:Mountains of Luxembourg
* :Category:Mountains of the Netherlands
These countries certainly have highest points, and these may arguably be called hills, but none of these would ever normally be described as mountains. Can we remove these categories? --David Edgar 10:49, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Benelux 'mountains'?
Talk:Michael Ainsworth

message: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.84.147 (talk • contribs) 
The article states that Ainsworth's last game, in 1964, was "Free Foresters' penultimate first-class game of all."  But there is still a Free Foresters website, which appears to contradct the claim that they played only one subsequent game. I hesitate to say that the author is one of those who uses the word "penultimate" to mean "insert impressive-sounding word here," but the apparent contradiction should be clarified or corrected. GMcGath 10:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification.  A couple of points, though: (1) It's customary to "sign" messages with four tildes (~~~~) to indicate when and by whom your comment was made.  (2) When something is flagged, it's usually an indication that the original wording was unclear, and it's worth thinking about how to make it clearer. I've made use of a condensed version of your comment to clarify the point in the article.  GMcGath 18:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the | template to the comment above yours, which makes things a little clearer. Thanks too for the addition to the article, which I wrote originally. Personally I don't think it's really necessary as first-class has been linked to earlier in the article for the benefit of anyone who doesn't know its meaning, but I'm not going to change your edit now. I'd also like to reassure you and any other readers that I know perfectly well what "penultimate" means - and even "antepenultimate" come to that, though as yet I believe I've resisted the temptation to use the latter in these articles! Loganberry (Talk) 06:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:G-Funk Entertainment

message: Can you provide the link on Discogs? Thank you. Tasc0 It's a zero! 03:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was there all the time, just the References section was missing. Edit version of the page would have revealed it. Lajbi Holla @ me 15:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single from ''[[Set It Off]]'' soundtrack
Category talk:Wikipedia spam cleanup

message: This cat should be placed on the talk pages of the articles, not in the actual articles themselves.  --  Zanimum 17:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. This category should not be placed anywhere. It is automatically added when the article is tag with certain maintenance templates, as specified on the category page. Debresser (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category placement
Talk:Bradley, Illinois

message: http://www.simon.com/mall/default.aspx?ID=186
Isn't Northfield Square technically in Bourbonnais?
--Scaryice 11:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burning Love

message: Isn't there also a flower called "burning love"? It might be the Maltese cross.67.168.11.249 11:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The featured cover photo is not that for the 1972 single, but for a compilation of the same name issued by RCA in 1999.  The single sleeve has a shot of Elvis in one of his garish sequined outfits of the period, complete with cape, with his name in yellow block letters above the titles of the songs on both the A and b sides of the single.PJtP 18:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cover incorrect 

message: Should the Wynonna Judd version that appears in Lilo and Stitch be mentioned in the article? Startrain844 (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wynonna Judd