Talk:CMA CGM

message: Does anyone know if CMA CGM is requesting a bailout from the French Government? And what the outcome of it is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.183.55.82 (talk) 15:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CMA CGM Bailout

message: What is meant by "largest container shipping company in Europe"? Both AP Moeller-Maersk and MSC (listed  as largest and second-largest shipping companies world-wide) are based in Europe. I also cannot find this statement on their website, which is given as reference. --194.209.126.131 (talk) 11:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest? 

message: User 193.109.119.24 deleted referenced information about the environmental record of CMA CGM.
This IP address is registered to the CMA CGM http://toolserver.org/~chm/whois.php?ip=193.109.119.24, breaching WP:Conflict of interest —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hectorguinness (talk • contribs) 18:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The same IP address also made further edits removing well sourced environmental criticism on 6th January. Could an administrator please block that IP address. Also it looks pretty likely that the user "shipping passion" has a conflict of interest. [11:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: John Wisky, a newly created account, made a number of edits to the page on 6th January, removing well sourced information about involvement with illegal logging, and added a load of Greenwash crap about how they comply with several international conventions. Could an administrator please protect this article?Hectorguinness (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your comments. I assume you work for CMA CGM. The material you deleted was sourced, and in line with Wikipedia editing guidelines. Editing articles about your company is not (WP:Conflict of Interest). Could an administrator please resolve this dispute? Thanks,Hectorguinness (talk) 18:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Always assuming Hector?,and you my friend maybe you work for mongabay.com or relaying their information without any other reliable sources (official documents, etc.). My point here Hector, it's to tell you that wikipedia is not a place to make some lobbying against firms or persons,or to manage a communication war agaisnt anyone. You can use blogs or News paper for that. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with reliable information with an honest approach... —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Wisky (talk • contribs) 10:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Further, I would appreciate the involved editors sharing their concise reasoning for the inclusion or exclusion of certain information.  —James Kalmar  19:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the unsourced pro-corporate environmental information.  It should not be reinserted without independent sourcing.  Also, the illegal logging information should not be readded (in my opinion) without more independent sourcing.  The only sources provided for the illegal logging were from an arguably partisan (environmental advocacy) organization.  If a newspaper or journal that is widely considered independent has information on either of these issues, feel free to add it with references.  Hope that helps, best wishes on your productive editing! —James Kalmar  19:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: HectorGuiness is implementing roumors and unfounded informations regarding CMA CGM environemental policy.
The way of publishing intentional false and harmful informations to a person or an organisation is suceptible of law pursuit.
Please block Hectorguinness in his illegal action.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Wisky (talk • contribs) 17:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments. I assume you work for CMA CGM. The material you deleted was sourced, and in line with Wikipedia editing guidelines. Editing articles about your company is not (WP:Conflict of Interest). Could an administrator please resolve this dispute? Thanks,Hectorguinness (talk) 18:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Always assuming Hector?,and you my friend maybe you work for mongabay.com or relaying their information without any other reliable sources (official documents, etc.). My point here Hector, it's to tell you that wikipedia is not a place to make some lobbying against firms or persons,or to manage a communication war agaisnt anyone. You can use blogs or News paper for that. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with reliable information with an honest approach... —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Wisky (talk • contribs) 10:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfounded

message: An editor recently listed this page as in need of a third opinion.  I will continue to look over the article.  However, I remind the above editors that the third opinion process is not for vandalism, as such should be reported to WP:AIV.  However, if this is a good faith content dispute, I will look over the article in the next day and give my opinion. —James Kalmar  19:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Further, I would appreciate the involved editors sharing their concise reasoning for the inclusion or exclusion of certain information.  —James Kalmar  19:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the unsourced pro-corporate environmental information.  It should not be reinserted without independent sourcing.  Also, the illegal logging information should not be readded (in my opinion) without more independent sourcing.  The only sources provided for the illegal logging were from an arguably partisan (environmental advocacy) organization.  If a newspaper or journal that is widely considered independent has information on either of these issues, feel free to add it with references.  Hope that helps, best wishes on your productive editing! —James Kalmar  19:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The company has launched a CO2-measuring tool at http://www.cma-cgm.com//environment source Such information is notable for clarifying the environmental impacts of various forms of transport. TGCP (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CO2-measuring tool 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CMA CGM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060208064547/http://assassinatsdecooperants.ouvaton.org/article.php3?id_article=3353 to http://assassinatsdecooperants.ouvaton.org/article.php3?id_article=3353
*Added  tag to http://www.cma-cgm.com/group_cma/article.asp?cId=226
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* Tour CMA-CGM et annexe, juin 2009.JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion