Talk:Mazda MX-6

message: The Japanese Mx-6 never had the FSZE, it received the same FS series engine as the North American counterpart. Blackpgt1994
Actually, the Japanese MX-6 never had the FS at all. It was powered by the KF-ZE 2.0 DOHC 24V V6. --Carcenomy 09:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: JDM market 1gens were all equipped with EFI engines, either F8 12v, F8-DOHC or FE-DOHC, most seem to be FE-DOHC. JDM 2gens all seem to be either KFZE or KLZE powered, I haven't seen a 2.0 4-cylinder 2gen JDM yet.
Euro market 1gens came with options like the FE 12v carburetted engine, to match the 626 moniker they went by at the time.
And of course, not all units were built by AutoAlliance, contrary to the original article. Most I imagine were assembled at Mazda Motor Corporation's plant at Hiroshima. --Carcenomy 02:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine options 

message: Anyone got brochures, sales data, magazine articles etc that can be referenced in this item? One reference to Car and Driver doesn't really cut it... :) --Carcenomy 02:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: One hillclimb, a rallycar does not make. The MX-6 had a better run in IMSA racing than it did as a rallycar, the rally duties were given to the Familia GT-R 4WD. --Carcenomy 09:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki World Rally?! 

message: Some cleanup is needed in the MX-6's second-generation article. Diction and grammar need to be adjusted to give the article some substance, and the A-, E-, and J-spec sections need to be distinguishably segmented. The New Zealand reference is very poorly written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setsunakute (talk • contribs) 19:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: Now as nice as it is, has anyone else noticed just how many times the word 'Probe' or the word '626' appears in this article? Should it not simply be mentioned once at the beginning of the article that the MX6 is based on the same GD and GE platforms that the 626/Capella and Probe use?
Furthermore, I think simplifying both the first and second generation articles to include less meaningless guff about minor options would make the article far more readable.
And can we please stop having alterations to include things like 'This specific one place didn't get that option' or 'We Canadians were the ONLY ones with the Mystere!'. It's ridiculous and makes us all look like dorks. --Carcenomy (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Less platform-compatible and subvariant information? 

message: Could anybody explain what does this term means? The only one meaning I've found in Google is "Asian Ass Sindrome"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.25.47.150 (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubbed AAS. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mazda MX-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829121626/http://www.mazda.com.au/articleZone5.aspx?articleZoneID=3807 to http://www.mazda.com.au/articleZone5.aspx?articleZoneID=3807
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)