lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jaora

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Jawhar

message: How to add photo of dam Henil Dandekar (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You can upload it to Commons and then use it in the article. --Kartik Mistry talk 14:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dam 
Talk:Jhalawar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Talk:Porbandar

message: The Gita Mandir is wrongly spelt as Githa Mandir. --Nirajrm talk ||| sign plz! 02:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gita Mandir spelling mistake 

message: As chowpaty is one of the main tourist as well as local attraction, so if any one have pics of the chowpaty or any other artical then pls post it over here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.27.235.5 (talk) 12:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of chowpaty 

message: There is a book called " The Hometown" written by Ssandeep B Teraiya, born in Porbandar in 1984.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssandeep2911 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book on the Porbandar - The Hometown
Talk:Sailana

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 08:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views
Talk:Sirohi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 

message: I've just removed the long section about temples. It was unsourced but in fact a copyright violation of this. If any of those temples are in fact notable then feel free to use that website as a source but please paraphrase it rather than pasting content from it to our article. - Sitush (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temples 

message: The  section is a listing of places of interest without any context. Under What Wikipedia is not, see WP:Directory which states that Wikipedia is not a directory. #7 among examples of directories is "Simple listings without context information. Examples include...tourist attractions." This is exactly what  is. Therefore, I intend to delete the section unless other Sirohi editors have an argument against deletion.Deccantrap (talk) 19:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Places of interest
Talk:Sitamau

message: * Those who are interested in developing this page are requested to follow the norms laid down in Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Cities. Please provide a proper reference or source for whatever you add to this page, in order that others can verify the facts from that reference. Matter without reference is likely to be deleted. -- P.K.Niyogi 03:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Guideline

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Makrai

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: The article says: The principality was founded by Maratha Rajah Devi Shah in the 1850s. This is not according Imperial Gazetteer of India, Worldstatesmen and http://uqconnect.net/~zzhsoszy/ips/m/makrai.html. --88.3.130.57 (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rulers
Talk:Order of Calatrava

message: Should the title of this article be changed to The Military Order of Calatrava, since that seems to be it's 'official' title? Note that both http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03149d.htm and http://www.chivalricorders.org/orders/spanish/calatrav.htm, two sources I found via google, title it in a similar manner.
Phreq 07:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The vast bulk of the current article is plagirised from the Catholic Encyclopedia (actually linked to at the bottom).98.206.179.6 (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagirism
Talk:Order of Santiago

message: Although it goes until the end of their autonomy, this article says nothing of their destruction or modern existance. Do the orders still exist and to what function?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.155.35 (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Link to sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:C4diazso/sandbox(part.III)
Summary expanded C4diazso (talk) 17:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation and Expansion
Talk:Kurwai

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Battle of São Mamede

message: This article gives much information about early Portugese history, but hardly anything about its proclaimes subject - the battle. Is there no imformation avaialble about the battle itself, the forces involved, the terrain, the tactics and strategy? And if there is not, than this fact itself should be noted. Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 10:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dunadd

message: I've heard a rumour that the boar got 'touched up' a bit by the Victorians to make it look more boarish, but that a photograph exists of what it looked like before they messed with it.  Anyone know anything more about that? Candle-ends 02:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Boar of Dunadd

message: Dunadd Castle was where kings of the old Scottish kingdom of Dál Riata were crowned for centuries This priceless snippet was lurking in the Kilmory Castle article. Putting it here just in case it has any merit for inclusion. Is it ever referred to as 'Dunadd Castle'? ::Supergolden:: 12:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a castle that I know of, just a hill fort. The article mentions the presumed coronation rituals at Dunadd. I don't think there's any firm evidence that kings were made there ("crowned" is very unlikely), but that's what is assumed by the experts. On pp. 18–19 of Ewan Campbell's Saints and Sea-kings there is an illustration by David Hogg showing a reconstruction of how he and Campbell think an inauguration at Dunadd would have looked. Cheers ! Angus McLellan  (Talk) 18:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunadd Castle 

message: Does anybody know if there is an etymological connection between Dunadd and Donal / Donald? Chienlit (talk) 13:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Donald
Talk:Jonathan Miller

message: Did he do NS, and if not, why not? Possibly exempt as a medical student? Seadowns (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: He was born in 1934 and would normally have been conscripted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.51.7.73 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: He seems to have studied until 1959 and worked as a civilian until 1961. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.51.7.73 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: He seems to have been in New York as a civilian in 1963. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.51.7.73 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Service 

message: I see that Miller's production of Bach's St Matthew Passion is mentioned under a heading which reads "Oratorium". Did Miller specifically insist on using this form to describe the work? If so, it might be worth mentioning. Or is it just a mistake by an editor whose first language is not English? If this is the case, I propose we change the heading to "Oratorio". LynwoodF (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As nobody has come back on this, I shall make the change I proposed. LynwoodF (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oratorium? 

message: the childhood section states "The young Miller was brought for assessment to several child psychiatrists, including Donald Winnicott"
sorry can this be explained. Presumably it is saying that, as a child, Jonathan Miller has issues with his mental health. Is that right ? There is no detail on this elsewhere. Is it that little or no further information is known. thank you. 82.11.163.59 (talk) 17:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This source supports Seamus O'Mahony's review of the autobiography In Two Minds, saying: "As a boy, Jonathan Miller underwent psychoanalysis with distinguished figures in the British movement, such as Susan Isaacs and D. W. Winnicott (Bassett 2012: 34)". But he doesn't say exactly what the problem was. But O'Mahony does also say this: "" I've added a bit of the explanation available. I expect In Two Minds may have more detail. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  assessment  by child psychiatrists ?
Talk:White hot

message: There should also be a discourse on the Texas Hot, which has nothing to do with Texas. Busjack 02:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I see no reason for both words in the title to be capitalized.  The article should be at White hot, just like Hot dog.  Powers T 13:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. I moved it. Kingturtle (talk) 14:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: * Jane & Michael Stern's Coast-to-Coast Cookbook (, published 10/12/1986) suggests ordering white hots from "Zab's Backyard Hots, Inc" on 1504 Scottsville Rd, Rochester, NY.  
** Was owned by Donad Zabkar per sources, born 1954 or 1955.
** Trademark registration is up and this business almost certainly is closed (never saw it during my time in Rochester).
* This page quotes many newspaper sources regarding the origins of white hots: .
Don't have time to incorporate any of this into the article right now, but welcome anyone with time to spare to do so — Tvh2k (talk) 02:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Additional Sources
Talk:Battle of Muret

message: I've reverted a change from "battle" to "battalion". In modern parlance, a battalion has a very specific organizational meaning – a self-sustaining maneuver unit, typically consisting of a headquarters company and bunch of companies. When it's used merely as a sub-unit, denoting essentially any unit into with a regiment is split, in archaic battles, "battle" as a unit size is actually okay. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battalion vs battle 

message: did i read it really wrong... but it seems to say 870 men defeated 40,000 i have my doubts:D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.160.9 (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Same thought occurred to me. The figures are cited, but are there any other sources? Could somebody speaking Spanish investigate the Spanish wikipedia article on this subject?1812ahill (talk) 10:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Spanish article also cites 870 vs. 20-40,000 men, but 'only' 10,000 dead. Still seems highly unlikely though, especially given that this battle was part of attempt of the church to crush the Cathars in the south of France and that as a result of their ultimate defeat most information regarding the Cathars was written, not by them, but by their enemies. Sounds like classic propaganda, a case of 'look a sign of the lord: the heretics were utterly smited'.1812ahill (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, this is thorough bull based on some completely unreliable mediaeval source, with the modern sources cited ad usum delphini Complainer (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  hmmm
Talk:Tony McCarroll

message: Everywhere states his year of birth as 1972 (and not his full date of birth) but in his book, Oasis: The Truth, he said he was born in the summer of 1971.  However he doesn't reveal his full date of birth other than that. Harmik88 (talk) 01:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:Battle of Malta

message: The term Angevin Empire is standardly used for the possessions of Henry II of England and his immediate successors, and not for those of Charles of Anjou - even though his supporters are commonly referred to as Angevins. I've replaced it with the Kingdom of Naples in the list of combatants - which is the relevant political entity, even if the term is anachronistic in this context.
PWilkinson 17:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combatant identification 

message: It appears sources conflict on the month of the battle. The existing sources and the article had July 8th. Today it was changed to June 8th citing this paper. I've reverted the change until we can sort things out. I know it's not definitive, but a Google search for June 8 returns "about 7 results", while a
Google search for July 8 returns "about 11,000 results". Thoughts? Mojoworker (talk) 21:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  June or July
Talk:Magical Circle Guru Guru

message: As Nike has a different seiyuu in each of the two series, it has been noted accordingly. Also, I put the source link at the end of the page...Ranma9617 02:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing

message: I just wanted to make the point that the staff in the girl's picture is NOT the staff she uses to make symbols with. She does not, in fact, ever use that staff outside of the first episode. The picture (or the caption) should be changed to reflect this. T.z0n3 04:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Staff

message: Since "Mahoujin Guru Guru" redirects here, shouldn't "Mahojin Guru Guru" redirect here as well? Jack 23:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: Shouldn't Nike be Thief class instead of Fighter class? 71.141.244.33 08:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nike 

message: The aricle really needs some inforamtion about the manga, which is mentioned only in passing. CFLeon (talk) 19:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have all the manga... but how do I go about editing the article? Shouldn´t there be citations from somewhere or can I just make a summary off the top of my head? Ericius (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably the best is to start a section 'Manga' and just go ahead and add the info. Someone will adjust it if needed. Citations are preferred, but don't go overboard with them. I don't know how to add a new segment to the infobox, so you'll need to look that up. CFLeon (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga

message: Don't know the early version but in the 2017 one, it was said that the Hero isn't a Class. Episode 8.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sufod01 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hero is not a class
Talk:Jobat

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Kushalgarh

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhopal State

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Khambhat

message: Aren't their rather a lot of references for one section? Are they all relevant? The Syed Amir Ali book, for instance, seems out of place, but I will check the book later. Energyworm (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rferences 

message: The Travels of Pietro della Valle in India, Vol. I (Hakluyt Society, 1892) includes an interesting account of Khambhat (spelled as "Cambai") and its surroundings from della Valle's visit in the 1620s.
The book is available for free from Google Books at: https://books.google.com/books?id=dUQPAAAAYAAJ.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.167.240 (talk) 04:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  della Valle book
Talk:You Got Me (The Roots song)

message: I don't understand why Mariah Carey's song as merged with this sentence/phrase, however, I have removed the merge and created a completely different page for the amazing song by neo-soul group The Roots. I am surprised it did not have a page already, but now it does. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mayebella (talk • contribs) 03:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "You Got Me" = The Roots' hit song. 

message: I have an original cd single with 2 more tracks than the ones on the page, can I add them? Can i just add them as track 3 and 4 or maybe is it a local release for Europe and then should be in a separate paragraph?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.17.207.155 (talk) 15:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD single tracklist 

message: — Assignment last updated by Harold Edward Johnson (talk) 19:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HipHop Music Culture
Talk:Playing by Heart

message: Does anyone really say "dramedy"? Just because the term exists- that's no reason to use it if it's not widely accepted. - Eric 03:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, I hear it used a lot - but only in reviews or press releases of movies and television shows (which does seem to be the arena we're working in here). It could perfectly be changed to Comedy-drama or something like that, but the terms are interchangeable really. Daydream believer2 04:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dramedy"? 

message: In this interview with Jon Stewart, David Letterman concludes with "Playing by Heart opens nationwide January 22[.]" However, this page states December 18. What's with the inconsistency? Aquaticsans (talk) 22:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, I found a Roger Ebert review that was released on the same day Letterman referenced. Aquaticsans (talk) 22:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Tom Jones (racing driver)

message: According to Driver Database (https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/tom-jones-57841/) and Brunner Obituary (http://www.brunners.com/obituaries/Thomas-Jones-23/#!/Obituary) Tom Jones (American racing driver) passed away on 29th May 2015 in Eastlake, Ohio.Pratodellaspiaggia (talk) 11:12, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Tom Jones Dead
Talk:Battle of Lyndanisse

message: Dannebrog is the oldest national flag in use today.
Untrue, the Scottish flag is the oldest!
:It is the oldest state flag in continuous use. Regarding the national flags, the Scottish claim remains disputed. The Aragonese claim that the Senyera is older than the Saltire. Valentinian T / C 23:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danneborg 

message: Is it spelt with a Y or an I? The title spells it with a Y, in the article it's spelt with an I. This needs to be clarified or standardised if one is the correct spelling. VenomousConcept (talk) 10:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The historical Estonian name is "Lindanise".H2ppyme (talk) 09:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Craigmillar Festival Society

message: I think I've done all I want to on this article. There are just so many POV issues with the original text I'm afraid that just editing & wikifying it is not going to be enough; it looks like a major rewrite is going to required, and I'm just not finding this subject personally interesting enough to do that. -- 63.226.38.196 03:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial efforts

message: Since the Quotes section had been flagged by others, I changed it to a Commentary section with a list of references. A slight improvement, but this section still overshadows the rest of the article in terms of length. Not sure what else to do here.
Trelawnie (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes/Commentary
Talk:Hanoverian succession

message: Why does this redirect to Glorious Revolution? The Hanoverian succession has at best tangential connections to the Glorious Revolution. Acts of Union 1707 might be a better redirect, at least, though the subject probably deserves its own article. —Cuiviénen,  03:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely correct -- Hanoverian succession has nothing to do with Glorious Revolution -- totally different dynasty. So I've redirected to the Act of Settlement 1701 which laid the ground rules for the Hanoverian succession on the death of Queen Anne in 1714. That article has plenty of links to other significant events or dates, such as the Acts of Union 1707 whereby Scotland acceded to the Act of Settlement of 1701. Dunnettreader (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Creadran Cille

message: BS!
Oliver Cromwell was king in WW2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kindred of St. Columba (talk • contribs) 02:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled