lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Southwick, Massachusetts

message: Should this section be more specific? JPJMendes (talk) 01:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Media 

message: This section seems like it was written entirely from original research and by a single, biased individual. The line "Concerned citizens strive to preserve Southwick's heritage" suggests this.
I edited the section to make it sound less biased, but it may be better to outright delete this section if there isn't a reliable source available. Onespankman (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, its kind of irrelevant aswell. User:Frogboy4 — Preceding undated comment added 00:05, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and deleted the "Town Center" and "Town Green" sections. Onespankman (talk) 00:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town Green Section Deletion
Talk:List of European Court of Justice rulings

message: There is a recent notable decision of the court, letting Turkish people -even if they are illegal aliens who seek for asylum- to establish business in the EU without any work permit obligations. It is also a sign that the current visa practice against Turkish citizens is illegal. Here are the links:
http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=84164
http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=122846
Do you think it should be added here as a notable decision? --212.31.0.50 14:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darı&Tüm vs UK 

message: Hello everyone, there's got to be a better way of organising this page, no? The 2004 list of pre-accession cases is useful, but the rest above is not. The problem is that we can't really have a complete list of cases, as there are about 1500 a year in the CJEU (but maybe with the Grand Chamber?). So it's hard to do something like UKSC cases or SCOTUS cases - it'd just be too long. The problem then is how to define what's notable, as most simply are not. But some chronology would be better. Thoughts very welcome. Wikidea 14:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better organisation?
Template talk:PD-Pre1964

message: This template is for images and other material first published between 1923 and December 31, 1963 but which do not have a copyright renewal on file with the United States Copright Office. It applies irrespective of whether the original publication was filed with the US Copyright Office, though in order to have continued copyright protection beyond 28 years, a "work" such as a photograph or other copyrightable material must have filed a renewal with the Copyright Office prior to the expiration of 28 years. Here are some resources to aid in determining whether an image or other material was renewed. For work published between 1923 and 1963, the renewal dates are 1950 through 1992.
*http://collections.stanford.edu/copyrightrenewals/bin/page?forward=home
*http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/renewals.html
*Catalog of copyright entries. These include books, periodicals and submissions to periodicals. All renewals are available in a searchable database from 1977-1990. For the years 1950-1977, "art" is not yet available online. Renewals of photographs were extremely rare from 1950-1992 (28 years after 1923-1963). Searches should, of course, include all books, periodicals and submissions to periodicals where an author (photographer, etc.) can be identified.
*Summary of copyright status of works in United States for works produced in the United States and also in other countries. 
... Kenosis 21:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose

message: I do not know what standard of proof, and standards of rebuttal and counter-rebuttal, will ultimately be agreed suitable for this class of images and other material published between 1923 and 1963. But offhand, I suggest that at minimum requiring a statement of the uploader that s/he was able to identify the author's name or name of an assignee with a date of copyright, and have done a search of the Copyright Office records in the years that apply, which are the years equivalent to 26, 27 and 28 years after original publication. Images without an explicit copyright notice identifying the copyright claim should, of course, consider using Template:PD-Pre1978 instead, or consider submission of an image under "fair use" and the WP:NFCC. ... Kenosis 22:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Standard of proof
Talk:Parker's Ferry

message: Moved the following to talk because it's original research and speculative:
:==Popularity==
:Parker's Ferry is by far probably the most popular and heaviest used of the North Carolina cable ferries. In the height of the summer the ferry has been known to haul nearly 30 cars per day. This may not seem like a lot, but taking into account the ferry's rural location, this is a heavy number.
:==Replacement==
:Many have worried over the years that the ferry might be replaced by a bridge. DOT officials have constantly said that the ferry will likely never be replaced with a bridge since a bridge over this river would cost millions of dollars in an already stretched state budget. The road that the ferry serves is also considered a secondary road which carries mainly local traffic and probably would not warrant the justification of building a multi million dollar bridge.
Move back when peacock words are removed and material cited.Toddstreat1 22:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Third Avenue

message: In manhattan 3rd Ave. isn't such a big deal, but it is a Major High Street in the bronx, second only to the Grand Concourse. I wonder if Bronx should be in the title? futurebird 13:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if we split it up each one would be too short and "stubby" -- that said I don't know to what degree the streets are "the same" --I think the best option is to change it to Third Avenue (New York City)  and have a little section about each. futurebird 13:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Bronx

message: The first image in this article is titled "Third Ave" but when opened the description says "Second Ave". It should be removed or replaced with an image of Third Ave if that image is in fact an image of Second Ave. I can not tell if it is or isn't. 72.220.110.184 (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The image description was wrong, which was obvious since Second Ave. is one-way South-bound.  I found the intersection in Street View and fixed the caption.  Dicklyon (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Nothing about the Third Avenue Railway in the Public Transportation chapter? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  06:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT.  Dicklyon (talk) 07:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did. It's a start, but it's still better than nothing. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  13:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Avenue El, but no mention of the Third Avenue Railway?
Talk:Mountain Meadows Massacre and Mormon public relations

message: Please clarify 'who what where when etc' in the following sentence:
*Leonard is one of the co-authors of the book the LDS Church is writing about the massacre.
Right now the sentence fails to answer
#Is the book about the massacre?
#Is the LDS church writing about the massacre?
#Is the LDS church writing a book about Leonard?
--Ancheta Wis (talk) 15:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly constructed sentence
Talk:Bruce Lynch

message: I came across these references here on Wikipedia, but do not know if they refer to the same person as the article: 
New Zealand Music Awards 1981 - PRODUCER OF THE YEAR Bruce Lynch - Dave McArtney and the Pink FlamingosNew Zealand Music Awards 1986 - BEST PRODUCER Bruce Lynch - Peking Man
Regards, --Technopat 22:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answer to my own question: yes, they do.--Technopat 13:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, just added a citation about the work he did on this album. I realise that the citation is less than ideal because it comes  from the artit's website, but it does mention Lynch.  Will look to find more information.Realitylink  03:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work with Yusuf/Cat Stevens on the 2020 remake of Tea for the Tillerman
Talk:Lightolier

message: I am familiar with this company, it is big and notable, however this article does not seem up to wikipedia standards.  Not a single reference about anything mentioned in the article and some information that seems 5 years out of date.  Surprised it has not been nominated for deletion. MarcoPolo419 (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of References
Category talk:Newsgroups

message: Is there any consensus on notability for newsgroups? There are many articles here which do not seem to assert the group's notability at all. I've come here after commenting on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt.atheism, but as I said there, I feel that this needs some discussion at a more general level, as I don't see anything special about alt.atheism. Mdwh 22:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:Zoé (band)

message: I'm curious, why I made an edit here and someone has switched it back to the original error already.
The sentance "No me destruyas" translates to "You don't destroy me", not "Don't destroy me"
"Don't destroy me" would be "No me destruya", similar in spelling, but very different in intention.  Even if it were the way the erroneous original poster and correcter were correct, the lyrics within the song would say "don't make me hurt when you cut me.." which makes far less sense then, "now you don't sharpen your knives.  now you don't hurt me when you cut me."  Anyways, the word 'ya' (already/now) doesn't make much sense in the imperative, but if you are talking about the current state of being as it is now, it does (present tense).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan9800 (talk • contribs) 06:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 13:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Zoé →  – Given the number of topics known as Zoé, Zoë, and Zoe, I don't believe that this band should be primary topic.  See Zoe (disambiguation) and Zoe (name). 162 etc. (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Some pageviews 162 etc. (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 May 2021
Talk:Riverby

message: Riverby and Slabsides are two distinct properties associated with the life of John Burroughs.  They are located about a mile apart, in West Park, New York.  They were both declared National Historic Landmarks on November 24, 1968, and they were assigned consecutive REFNUMs in the Register of Historic Places.
In the NHL system, Riverby gets REFNUM 68000035;  Slabsides is 68000034
In the NRIS system, Riverby gets REFNUM 68000035;  Slabsides is 68000034
In the National Register search system, searching on "Riverby" yields "Burroughs, John, Riverby Studio".  However the PDF text and photo files that are served up, with refnum 68000035 within their URL / filename, describe "Slabsides".  Searching on "Slabsides" yields nothing.  So currently the Riverby text and photos from its Landmark nomination / NRHP registration are unavailable, on-line.
Check the links to NPS URLs/filenames:
*Link to Text 68000035 yields "Slabsides" NRHP writeup
*Link to Photos 68000035 yields Slabsides--Accompanying photos 
*Link to Text 68000034 yields nothing
*Link to Photos 68000034 yields nothing 
doncram 21:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Riverby vs. Slabsides NHLs in the NPS system
Talk:Embedded Application Binary Interface

message: It seems that the ARM EABI and PowerPC EABI formats have nothing in common but the name... is this true? Morcheeba 22:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:06, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Battle of Keren

message: I see the infobox contains the Italian casualty figures quoted from the Compton Mackenzie book (see quote in Aftermath section). However a) I am always dubious about casualty figures estmated by the other side and b) Mackenzie's figure was supposed to be only for the initial 5 days fighting. Does anyone have another source we can use to tie this figure down? Stephen Kirrage talk - contribs 22:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Casualties

message: Copied sections from the East African Campaign WWII and managed to glean more details about casualties, local soldiers mostly overlooked by colonial authorities as usual.Keith-264 (talk) 09:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent expansion 

message: I think you know more about wraps and conversions than I do. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: There is no citation in this article for the 5 February date given.  This was raised at WP:ERRORS ahead of a proposed main page appearance in 2021.  I had a quick look for sources but just found a variety that place the start date between 2 and 4 February.  Crossposting the conversation there below.  Can anyone shed any light on this? - Dumelow (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll have a look in Playfair, OH ME I tonight. Keith-264 (talk) 09:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry I forgot. Keith-264 (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Keith-264, thanks for looking.  I think there's a consensus in the sources towards 3 Feb to 27 March then? I've changed the infobox and cited Playfair - Dumelow (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of battle
Talk:List of cities in Qatar

message: There reads: Over 90 percent of Qatari citizens live in Doha, the capital.
However, using most recent figures for both articles, I get about 60%, not 90. As Doha article says: Doha is Qatar's largest city, with over 60% of the nation's population 212.50.203.198 (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WTF is this article? Lusail has footnote number 6: "Population: 1,213; area: 36.0 km; includes Jabal Thuaileb, Al Kharayej, Lusail, Al Egla, and Wadi Al Banat."
However Lusail article tells "second-largest city in Qatar", and infobox there tells population (2022) is 198,600. So that is over 150 times more than the footnote tells.
Though Lusail is in municipality Al Daayen, which artile has population 54,339. These do not make sense: city in municipality would have over 3.5 times the population than whole municipality itself? 86.115.107.96 (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF
Portal talk:Systems science/Article

message: A listing is created here below to suggest future articles and subscripts for the systems science portal.  
Feel free to add articles to the listing. If the queue is too long for your liking, just push an earlier articles to the end or rearrange as you see fit. 
I suggest we eventually try for variation in time period and subject matter. - Mdd 13:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for future articles
Portal talk:Systems science/Picture

message: A listing is created here below to suggest future images and subscripts for the systems science portal.  
Feel free to add images to future images in the listing. If the queue is too long for your liking, just push an earlier image to the end or rearrange as you see fit. 
I suggest we try for variation in time period and subject matter in the end. - Mdd 12:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for future images 

message: * An aerial view of a human ecosystem. Pictured is the city of Chicago in 2005. Human ecosystems are complex cybernetic systems that are increasingly being used by ecological anthropologists and other scholars to examine the ecological aspects of human communities in a way that integrates multiple factors as economics, socio-political organization, psychological factors, and physical factors related to the environment. 
:Suggested by - Mdd 12:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing
Portal talk:Systems science/Systems scientist

message: A listing is created here below to suggest future systems scientists and subscripts for the systems science portal.  
Feel free to add systems scientists to future systems scientists in the listing. If the queue is too long for your liking, just push an earlier systems scientist to the end or rearrange as you see fit. 
I suggest we eventually try for variation in time period and subject matter. -Mdd 12:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They might..!? But I don't think these are the "prototype" systems scientists, this portal wants to introduce. Anyway. These introductions are limited to articles that are in a good shape, and preferable contain a picture. Those two articles need a lot of work. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions for future systems scientists 

message: Would Stephen Grossberg and Gail Carpenter be considered a systems scientists?  They worked on modeling neural behavior architecture (adaptive resonance theory, which has implication in describing complex learning systems.  128.206.160.63 (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They might..!? But I don't think these are the "prototype" systems scientists, this portal wants to introduce. Anyway. These introductions are limited to articles that are in a good shape, and preferable contain a picture. Those two articles need a lot of work. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Grossberg 

message: Joseph Francis Shea (September 5, 1926–February 14, 1999) was an aerospace engineer and NASA manager. As head of the Apollo Spacecraft Program Office, Shea played a key role in shaping the course of the Apollo program, helping to lead NASA to the decision in favor of lunar orbit rendezvous and supporting "all up" testing of the Saturn V rocket.
Shea's speciality was systems engineering: a new type of engineering in the 1950s that focused on the management and integration of large-scale projects, turning the work of engineers and contractors into one functioning whole. He played a significant role in the Titan I project; as George Mueller writes, "he contributed a considerable amount of engineering innovation and project management skill and was directly responsible for the successful development of this pioneering guidance system...."
Read more...
Proposal by - Mdd 12:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing
Talk:Tanya Franks

message: I know that American is tagged with a "citation needed" tag, but this doesn't seem to be enough. A casual web search turn up no other evidence to support the claim that she's American, and at least one other site claims that she's English (try this search: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=tanya+franks+plumstead&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official). Until it can be substantiated, shouldn't the statement that she's American be removed?
Eamonnb (talk) 09:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it now. Shouldn't statements which appear to be wrong and uncited just be removed on sight? --Oolong (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Abdulla Bin Zaid Al Mahmoud Islamic Cultural Center

message: Somewhere in Doha you can find the largest chandelier in the world. Large chandeliers often tend to be in large mosques. Anyone who knows if this mosque has the world's biggest chandelier? Akedahllof (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chandelier 

message: Add an image please.--88.104.136.143 (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Bastak County

message: Brightkingdom (talk) 20:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution for 2016 administrative divisions and their populations
Talk:Nebraska School for the Deaf

message: refs are good. Pics? Bit short for a B. Good start Victuallers 14:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cinebar, Washington

message: Cinebar is larger than just the bump in the road where the post office is located.  It is a large area running from the 508 along Lake Mayflower down to just above where the 12 cuts through Salkum.  --Markisgreen 00:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For [[131.191.144.91]]

message: Unfortunately I cannot find a Wiki rule or reg that places limits on the supported and properly sourced detail of an unincorporated area's page, much less anything that determines what constitutes a level of "inappropriate level of detail".  Backing up that original explanation with the statement that the borders of Cinebar are undefined would not be true, as voting district maps and voting totals going back decades back up that Cinebar has long been recognized as having a distinct voting area, and geographic maps going back to the early 20th century outline the areas borders (shifting, granted, but so does every location's borders and voting districts in the US given enough history).
Therefore no original work was done on the last edit as the voting totals are approved by the county and the state and not by anything speculative.  As well, the nearby attractions (which was moved from the lede to its own section) are, well, factual...I mean, look at any map around Cinebar.
Concluding this argument, making the charge of speculation and WP:OP, as well as determining without an accepted Wiki guideline that the information added was inappropriate, is a long stretch and unfounded as well.  In accordance with WP:AGF, my original edit that was reverted is restored, with an added voting district map reference and the replacement of the dismissive and condescending word referring to local areas and cities as "settlements".
On a related, but more personal note, I must also add that expanding articles are crucial, not just for the knowledge, and not just for Wikipedia's long history of encouraging participation and new editors (you know, to inspire people to add more information...to an encyclopedia...), but pride in the topic, especially the people influenced or partaking in what the page entails.  When we limit a small town, like Cinebar, to strict geographical definitions, determining thru unsupported "judge and jury" declarations, that only a fraction of its history, story, and knowledge can be written down, we do the opposite of what knowledge is.  We risk the loss of knowledge.  Furthermore, it belittles the people of past, present, and future of any small area.  As if they don't matter.  Well, I'll be damned to see that happen here at Wikipedia to a good place like Cinebar.Shortiefourten (talk) 05:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of July 24, 2021
Talk:Zapf Dingbats

message: I reverted the page. Someone replaced the instances of "dingbat" with "wombat."  Read about wombats. Notthe9 00:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: Article claims ITC picked 360 symbols and put them in three sets called 100,200,300. But there is only one table that cannot contain more than 256 symbols shown, and there was only one font on the Apple Laserwriter, and this is what most people call "Zapf Dingbats". Anybody know which subset this is, or if it yet another further subset?
Spitzak (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not too sure what that's referring to, but I don't see how it applies to the mainstream of microcomputer typesetting from 1984 onwards... AnonMoos (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I was confusing "Symbol" with "Zapf Dingbats". However this article shows a single table that cannot contain more than 256 symbols, but the intro talks about a set of 360 symbols, plus "100, 200, 300" subsets. Would like to know how the table relates.Spitzak (talk) 21:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which subset?