Talk:Pro Bowl

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Pro Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=320129031
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/12-04-407.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/05-11-162.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130216125003/http://channels.isp.netscape.com/sports/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/1001/20130128/hi0494.htm to http://channels.isp.netscape.com/sports/story.jsp?idq=%2Fff%2Fstory%2F1001%2F20130128%2Fhi0494.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140409212415/http://nflcommunications.com/2014/04/09/2015-pro-bowl-to-be-played-in-arizona-2016-pro-bowl-slated-for-hawaii/ to http://nflcommunications.com/2014/04/09/2015-pro-bowl-to-be-played-in-arizona-2016-pro-bowl-slated-for-hawaii/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140409212415/http://nflcommunications.com/2014/04/09/2015-pro-bowl-to-be-played-in-arizona-2016-pro-bowl-slated-for-hawaii/ to http://nflcommunications.com/2014/04/09/2015-pro-bowl-to-be-played-in-arizona-2016-pro-bowl-slated-for-hawaii/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725165534/http://www.khon2.com/home/ticker/39250577.html to http://www.khon2.com/home/ticker/39250577.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141125233857/http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/The_Pro_Bowl.htm to http://www.mmbolding.com/BSR/The_Pro_Bowl.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nflgsis.com/Schedule/probowls.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Might See TV. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  gnu57 14:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Might See TV" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: At Pro Bowl#Rule differences:
* No rushing punts, PATs or FG attempts
Unless I'm misunderstanding this, it's not correct. There are (at least) PATs in today's game. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 01:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No PATs or FG attempts? 

message: These must be shown.  NFC and Kyler Murray. They have been referenced as official results by the AP as this was the official pro bowl that year.  They were on there for a long time until Sabbatino took it out repeatedly because he did not like it personally.--Mapsfly (talk) 18:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 (2020 season) virtual Pro Bowl winner and MVP 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus, too soon to move. As for splitting, open another discussion, thanks. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pro Bowl →  – Why ... new official name for foreseeable future Vataxevader (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Split...two different things. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 07:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Realistically, any content page split should involve a separate discussion, under WP:PROSPLIT, than an RM. Like the Cleveland Browns relocation controversy and the issues with the Cleveland Browns history and records versus the Baltimore Ravens history and records, it is not up for us Wikipedia editors alone to decide if the Pro Bowl history, player selection and records; and the Pro Bowl Games history, player selection and records; are "two different things" if the NFL does not do so. I'm curious how the 2023 NFL Record and Fact book is going to list theses records when it gets published this Summer. Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 February 2023