lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edie Sedgwick

message: The lede currently is
An editor, Laurencebeck, is wanting to make some changes here, so here's a place for the matter to be discussed by all of us. My first impression is that the lede is OK as it, not broke don't fix. But willing to be convinced. Herostratus (talk) 09:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Herostratus, the change proposed doesn't seem encyclopedic. In particular, it is written non-neutrally, and contravenes the guideline WP:Words to watch. LK (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: LK, I hope you don't mind that I shortened your contribution to the lede, as it seemed undue to focus too much on her decline and death that it overshadowed what she actually did that was notable, which is to star in many Warhol films as a Warhol "Superstar". If you object to my changes, please feel free to restore the content. On another note, I agree with the changes that Herostratus made. Netherzone (talk) 13:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede 

message: The text says: "She gave up drugs and alcohol after meeting her future husband Michael Post, and completed filming Ciao! Manhattan in early 1971. Post and Sedgwick married in July 1971; she died four months later of an overdose at age 28."
So apparently she had not given up drugs! At least this needs clarification. GeneCallahan (talk) 19:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gave up drugs?
Talk:Joint session of the United States Congress

message: This needs more info, or it's just a copy of what's in the U.S. Congress article. Sugestion, notable Joint Sessions in history. --John R. Barberio  talk, contribs  21:52, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The House. - 64.187.160.52 (talk) 07:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more 

message: While every address to a joint session of Congress is significant, the fact that Italy leaders have given four such addresses seems no more significant than the fact that French leaders have given five and Spanish leaders have given two.  M Pinck 13:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign dignitaries 

message: I'm working on a proposed revamp of United States Congress in the United States Congress/sandbox and will move some material to this article here. But looking this over, I think this article needs a copyedit -- too many section breaks in my opinion. If people have concerns please let me know here or on my talk page. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:06, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit proposed 

message: Is there any reason to believe that President Obama's address on jobs is going to more remarkable than the dozens of others Presidential addresses?  If we're going to list examples, I would think Wilson's 14 Points speech, FDR's post-Pearl Harbor speech and George W. Bush's War on Terrorism speech are better examples.  Unless someone explains the selection of this particular address, I'm going to edit the section and reference other examples of remarkable Presidential addresses. M Pinck (talk) 11:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the ACA joint address was remarkable if only for Joe Wilson's breach of decorum. - 64.187.160.52 (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidential Addresses 

message: Who calls joint sessions? Are the houses obliged to attend? Can the houses refuse to hold a joint session? Could a president therefore decide to hold a joint session every single day just to screw with Congress? - 64.187.160.52 (talk) 07:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who and how? 

message: The state of the union can be delivered in written form but if it is an address then it must be to a joint session. Psalms79;6-7 (talk) 19:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Source?  (Just saying it stands to reason won't cut it.) --Closeapple (talk) 03:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.voanews.com/a/is-state-of-the-union-speech-required-no/4746166.html Psalms79;6-7 (talk) 14:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  State of the Union 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Counting of the electoral votes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 7#Counting of the electoral votes until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Bagumba (talk) 11:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Counting of the electoral votes" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Pejorative terms

message: Ever since the old, very bloated page listing all of the various pejorative political terms was deleted, there doesn't seem to be a category where that stuff should of been converted into. Should a subcategory be made for political terms? What should be done with pejorative terms that are definitely in use, but wouldn't merit an article by themselves (e.g. gun grabber, gun nut, abortion on demand, etc.)? Maybe have the terms redirect to the neutral articles a la gun control for the gun terms, morality of abortion for the abortion ones, etc.? Input appreciated. Ngchen 02:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political terms?
Talk:Organ recital

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 20:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Gambier Islands and Tuamotu-East

message: Sorry, my comment in the edits-history has a tiny but crucial mistake. Instead of the following text:"I think it is not worth now to create an own page about this topic. Its better to concentrate the topic on the already existing page Île Tuamotu-Gambier because it is anyway a reference on itself"I should have written:"I think it is not worth now to create an own page about this topic. Its better to concentrate the topic on the already existing page Îles Tuamotu-Gambier because it is anyway a reference on itself"I am really sorry -- Citylover 20:18, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I made a wrong edit-commentary, sorry
Talk:Coop Himmelb(l)au

message: Is this organization legally structured as a cooperative? Gobonobo T C 02:56, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cooperative status

message: Coop Himmel(l)au has produced a vast amount work, both theoretical and built. They raised important questions in the field of contemporary architecture. As such, this page should be worked on. We could use more info on the firm, and its founders... Psilosphere 19:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could be more  
Talk:Alexandra Sviridova

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 20:47, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Scott Brown (DJ)

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 21:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Susan Glaspell

message: yeah, right now i'm just citing the ben-zvi bio instead of the sources it cites. i'll fix this shortly, i'm just focusing on writing the bio text right now so people will know about SG when I speak of her IRL, since this wiki article never really told her story. Once I'm finished reading the ben-zvi bio and writing the the bio text here, i'll point these citations more directly to their sourc.e  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JiggyWittit (talk • contribs) 02:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  citations 
Talk:R. David Paulison

message: Does anyone know if he went there before or after he worked as a firefighter? The article should be more clear. Tfine80 19:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  JFK school 
Talk:Château Margaux

message: on the german sites are photographs, GNU licensed. :-)) 
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C3%A2teau_Margaux
:It would be nice to incorporate them. Can anyone freely and easily move them over to Commons? MURGH disc. 16:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See User talk:Murgh#Bordeaux pictures. Tomas e (talk) 13:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: For POV discussion concerning the flagged section, please see Talk:Château Haut-Brion. --BridgeBurner 06:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 
Talk:Sule Skerry

message: Removed There is a disused lighthouse at the north and a cairn at the south. as the NLB site doesn't say it's disused.--JBellis 21:21, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In folk music, the great silkie was from SKule Skerry. Does anyone know where the "k" came from and was it ever correct? --Ampwright (talk) 01:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Variant spelling
Talk:Château Latour

message: Where are the reviews? Surely if it's worth so much, some people of note have said something about it, more recently than Thomas Jefferson. GreenReaper (talk) 06:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  But is it any good? 
Talk:The king and the god

message: Actually if you look at Sampson's page:
* It seems the text was not originally composed by Sen; rather he identified a traditional text.
* As Sampson found it published, the text used "the spelling system traditional among Indo-Europeanists." Sampson transliterated it to his own system because he didn't know how to display it in HTML. Sampson cites J.P. Mallory and D.Q. Adams, Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, London and Chicago, 1997.
Does someone have access to Mallory and Adams who could provide their spelling? --teb728 21:24, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the problem is that there are disagreements about the original sound values, so IPA wouldn't be useful, here. 81.232.72.148 15:14, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: What are the full names of the individuals here? Hard to link without knowing. Rmhermen 18:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: The first reconstruction given here surprises me in its lavish use of demonstrative pronouns as (all but) unstressed personal pronouns and articles. (- or at least of the 3. sg. m. nom. demonstrative.) It feels very modern to me, and contrary to all we seem to know of older Indo-European languages, as far as my knowledge goes - and that of many others, I fancy. Has anybody an explanation to give, please - in the article, not here! - whether that the reconstruction is likely chronocentric, or that it relies on some (what?) evidence little known among educated amateurs like me?  Keinstein 15:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from that, it seems to be TOO Latin-like. 12.71.155.26 (talk) 09:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles and unstressed personal pronouns
Category talk:Platformers

message: Can someone figure out why the Castlevania games are still listed here directly?  They were subcategorized but not dropped from this list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.76.159.32 (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the last remaining game to the subcategory. Everything in order as of August 2013. Moritz37 (talk) 11:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving Castlevania games to subcategory
Talk:Lamit Company

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 21:33, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Angelo Bruno

message: Is it really necessary to show a human corpse on a Wikipedia page? --2001:48F8:3028:C17:1870:7FCC:AD2C:1365 (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:UNCENSORED. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Crime Scene Photo
Talk:Genetic marker

message: that "genetic marker", in a medical dictionary, will have a definition like:
 genetic marker n. A gene phenotypically associated with a particular, easily identified trait and
 used to identify an individual or cell carrying that gene
but in geneology studies, it mostly refers to "junk DNA" areas.
A marker isn't necessarily associated with a phenotype.  It's just a "unique" sequence.  That is, di, tri, and tetranucleotide repeats aren't unique in the usual sense.  But the number of repeats can make it a good identifier.  Also, the uniqueness needn't be global.  Usually we're only concerned with a small sub-population.  The markers must be somewhat unique within the sub-population in order to be of any use.  If it's a marker than everyone has, it's not a marker, just part of the normal DNA sequence.   neffk 03:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like no one is. I came here looking for a mention of "neutral genetic markers" (aka "junk DNA"), but found none. —Pengo 04:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note 

message: The article Isozymes says that isozymes are genetic markers, but describes them as being enzymes with the same function but coming from different loci, while this article states that genetic markers have to be easily identifiable, associate with a specific locus . I'm confused.
In my opinion the present article Genetic markersneeds major editing. A general issue is that the concept of genetic markers should be kept separate from that of selectable marker gene. The paragraph about insulin production refers to the latter, and should be removed.
In fact, genetic markers mark a chromosomal site and, in the modern sense, they are not necessarily genes.
Exapmples of other mistakes:
in 'Types':
The sentences "A primer amplifying ..." should rather be "A primer pair amplifying ...".
The sentence "detection of markers can be direct by RNA sequencing..." should rather be "detection of markers can be direct by DNA sequencing..."
Daniele Rosellini (talk) 07:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isozymes not genetic markers? 

message: Both of them are different. One can infer it from the difference in both their definitions itself.
Atul Kaushal 16:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It should not be merged 

message: 2016.09.02 There is an ad on TV about 7 fuel additives. the last is marker molecules. What are they talking about?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.91.132.120 (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV fuel ad
Talk:Peter Brimelow

message: Recent news story about Brimelow:
*
Brimelow is suing the NYT for calling him a white nationalist, and specifically for linking to a SPLC profile which supports this description. Strangely, Brimelow isn't suing the SPLC, just the NYT, but still uses the suit as a platform for repeating the usual complaints about the SPLC. Grayfell (talk) 05:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1/10/20 Politico story 

message: to add the (non-white) in front of immigration in the first paragraph, considering that Brimelow criticized the 1965 immigration act for choking off "immigration from northern and western Europe while selectively opening up US borders to an influx of minorities from Third World countries?" I honestly don't see it as disruptive when it is a true statement based off his stances in white supremacy. Billgogi (talk) 21:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it's called "original research". Please read WP:OR and come back if you have further questions. Fred Zepelin (talk) 23:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is it disruptive... 

message: Peter Brimelow is not a "white supremacist."  This description is totally false and should be eliminated.  Only those immersed in the racist woke fantasy world will label him as such.  No evidence is provided.  To be against illegal immigration is not to be racist.  Only those who label others as such deservedly should be called facists/communists themselves,  who would gladly send those they disagree with to gas chambers. Noynoynoy (talk) 04:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: see WP:V and WP:RS]. Seems pretty well sourced.  Cannolis (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2024
Talk:Medieval Scenarios and Recreations

message: Medieval Scenarios and Recreation is dedicated to recreating aspects of the Middle Ages. Towards this end, they have a number of unique requirements. Although a surface similarity to other groups such as the Society for Creative Anachronism exists, M.S.R.'s requirements of leather or steel armor, dedication to specific skills, and level of activity place them in a unique category. They maintain a Jousting Team, with four horses. Their featured event, the Sands Point Medieval Festival, is currently in its 25th year.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Softprose (talk • contribs) 21:52, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Gardnerella vaginalis

message: The link HBT agar doesn't work. I found a disambiguation page HBT, which points toward a preferable HBT (agar) but this doesn't exist either. Situation will need to be looked at again in future. Emble64 (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: HBT

message: The page shows, "Once classified as a species of Haemophilus". I was under the impression that it still is a species of Haemophilus and that the name Gardnerella vaginalis was an older term used mostly by clinicians while Haemophilus vaginalis was a more current term used by microbiologists.
WRONG.
But then again, the whole damn page is pretty ridiculously bad, and has to be rewritten by an expert.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.130.213.57 (talk) 04:23, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old vs New Name 

message: someone seemed to incorporate suggestions/commentary into the article itself  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.123.253.1 (talk) 12:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: what's up with this article
Talk:Gas-absorption refrigerator

message: This page appears to have been lifted--in its entirety--from http://www.gasrefrigerators.com/howitworks.htm
Anybody who wants to help me begin a new write up would be most appreceiated.
CheersIroll 22:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's right, gas absorption refrigerators operate differently than common domestic refrigerators.  —Ryanrs 16:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

text: You are probably right - I wrote that part, and aimed at making it understandable the way I understood it more so than ensuring technical correctness.  Your rationale sounds reasonable, please feel free to fix it. Reswobslc 09:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Edition (printmaking)

message: Some day, it may be a good idea to have a wikipedia section where changes in different editions of text book are highlighted. This would serve two uses:
# It would increase the value of old editions of the books since one can easily judge whether the changes in a text book edition are worth investing in a new text edition.
# It would discourage publishers from releasing text book editions that only incorporate cosmetic changes. This would work as such a move would easily backfire when the first point reach maturity.
- perhaps, but not here as this all about printmaking
Johnbod 17:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I came here wondering about limited edition photographs, which also exist.
The part about plates wearing out doesn't apply, though.  Gah4 (talk) 03:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  photography
Talk:Göta Canal

message: I plan to rename this page as Göta Canal. Although I don't speak Swedish, kanal apparently means canal (or channel, but in this case it's "canal"), so the English Wikipedia name should be Göta Canal. As with all Wikipedia moves, there would be a Wikipedia:redirect left at Göta kanal. Any objections? Art LaPella 22:29, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
: No objections here. I'd also support moving "Göta älv" to "Göta River", if you think it plausible. Fred-Chess 06:35, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed

message: Really nice rewritten article.  Although I could take a pretty good guess, the map purporting to show the route of the canal, does not actually show a route.  Some different color marking of the canal, or some other explicit marking, is needed to show the route. doncram (talk) 00:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route? 

message: The article claims that Trollhätte Canal is now a part of Göta Canal but where are the sources for that?
According to both the official tourist page for Göta Canal and the The Swedish Maritime Administration website the Göta Canal runs from Mem to Sjötorp. 31.209.29.187 (talk) 06:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trollhätte Canal
Talk:Superior Hiking Trail

message: I'm working with two classmates in an effort to rewrite and improve some of the elements on this page, one of them being the lead. Currently it lacks the quality of a well written lead and is the edited result of past plagiarism. My classmates and I intend to rewrite the lead within the next few weeks. The new lead will contain broad information about the trail with some small cite able details thrown in. This will better "funnel" readers into the specifics of the article. Feel free to make suggestions and give us feedback on our progress.
Brianmg5 (talk) 00:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead 

message: I also think that this page needs some work with the plagiarism and organization. The page should be divided up into topics instead of everything in a big clump. The lead need needs to be rewritten as said above by brianmg5. Some topic dividers could be about history, geography, wildlife, camping, etc...Mherwig (talk) 02:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: After writing a new lead, I reorganized some of the existing information into sub sections. Also, thanks to Mherwig, this article now has a History section. Brianmg5 (talk) 21:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: The SHTA has conflicting information on the length of the south section of the trail. http://www.shta.org/Trail/TrailMaps/index.php says that it is 42 miles. http://www.shta.org/Trail/Duluth.phphttp://www.shta.org/index.php says that it is 39 miles. I have 39 miles entered as of right now Trapeterson (talk) 01:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confilcts 

message: Does a public map image exist that can be added? LegalTech (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Villa Giulia

message: The following text was deleted:
:"At this time, before the English style of naturalistic landscaping gained in popularity, the most pleasant imaginable vista from a garden was that of orderly husbandry, where the hand of man had tamed the wanton disorder and danger that Nature represented."
To an unprepared eye this looked like "original" research, I suppose. Extraordinary. I wonder what seemed "wrong" to someone.  --Wetman 10:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's been romev 'cause it sounded a bit pompous and unencyclopedical. --Attilios 10:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled