lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nancy Newman

message: Please take out Nancy's last name she used while working in Canada, as this is her actual last name and it cannot be online for privacy/safety reasons. 
Please take out that Nancy uses her mother's maiden name, Newman, because her mother's maiden name is not Newman.  To add more information on Nancy's career visit http://web.yesnetwork.com/announcers/bio.jsp?id=nnewman, which she approved the YES network write about her.
Lyndsayalarice (talk) 02:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Already explained on your talk  - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Again NOT DONE and WILL NOT BE DONE.  - Mlpearc (open channel) 01:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2016 

message: How does this page look to everyone? 
Nancy Newman is an anchor and reporter on the YES Network.  
Newman began her career as a radio personality in 1988 joining Scarborough Cable 10, where she eventually became sports director. Newman then did freelance work for CHCH-TV in Toronto and TSN, including on horse racing and motorsport programs. 
In 1992, she was chosen out of hundreds of candidates to replace Hannah Storm at CNN Sports and CNNSI in Atlanta, where she worked for ten years.   
In 2000, Newman hosted Turner Sports' Emmy-Award-winning coverage of the NHL Atlanta Thrashers inaugural season. 
In 2003, Newman joined YES Network. She is a host/anchor for the New York Yankees Pre-Game Show and the New York Yankees Post-Game Show for New York Yankees telecasts, as well as the pregame and postgame shows for the Brooklyn Nets. She is also the host of Yankees Magazine, the official magazine show of the New York Yankees. In addition, Newman was a reporter for NBC at the 2004 Olympics Games in Athens, Greece.
Newman holds a degree from the University of Toronto.
Lyndsayalarice (talk) 02:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You just do not understand, The page IS NOT going to be changed to YOUR liking, go find something better to spend you time on.  - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: This article should not be deleted, as it is for a notable personality.  Milchama (talk) 13:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The delete discussion is here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Newman, your comments here will not be considered.  - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:22, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion
Talk:Nancy Nord

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Montagu Square

message: The development of Georgian London is a significant phenomenon in the history of architecture and town planning. That something should be written on each square and estate involved (it's not a vast number!) seems quite reasonable to me, even the plainer ones so that people may understand that not all were as grand as each other. The declaration by Gretnagod that, if this stays, then "every other square on the planet would have to be" included is absurd. I wish his/her user page (which states his/her aims as nothing more than "To ensure all additions are worthwhile, and all removals are needed ") also explained how articles which may develop into sound, interesting ones are detected in this single-minded editing process.
Hotlorp 02:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasoning that this page shoud not be deleted
Talk:Nancy Rothwell

message: Not quite sure how to add this to the article, but Nancy Rothwell's claim on Newsnight that she had written to the black student who had been racially profiled to apologise was not true, and that she has now written to the student to apologise for making that false claim.
Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/nov/22/manchester-university-chief-apologises-for-false-claim-over-racial-profiling-incident
YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS_UE-yuZ3M
StephenJPC (talk) 11:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , though you're right that it's difficult to summarise without sounding too muddled, so feel free to revise what I've added.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks, that's really clear, no need to revise at all.
StephenJPC (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apology claim
Talk:WJKR

message: I originally arrived here from a redirect for station WEGE, which is assigned to a station in Lima Ohio, owned by Maverick Media - the call sign for station WUZZ was changed to WEGE on 4/19/2007
StreamingRadioGuide 12:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Odo Russell, 1st Baron Ampthill

message: Russell's personal success with Otto von Bismarck led to his appointment as ambassador at Berlin in October 1871.
: What personal success? Bismarck isn't mentioned prior to this statement. Presumably it's an allusion to a congenial official or political relationship with the Iron Chancellor, but we don't know. Suggest this phrase be deleted as confusing. – Sca (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Personal success'
Talk:Lexx/LEXX Vs Lexx Discussion

message: Between this and the Lexx spaceship page there is no consitancy about using all caps to refer to the ship rather than the TV show. In fact, I don't think I've seen anyone use all caps anywhere else.
Either the all caps should be used throughout the Wikipedia, or this page should be renamed 'Lexx (TV series)' and the LEXX page to 'Lexx (spaceship)'. Any thoughts about which would be better?
:Merge the two articles. - --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 11:02, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "LEXX" vs "Lexx"

message: The title of the series should be "LEXX", but when refering to the ship, I don't think the entire word is capitalized. It's not an acronym, and it is a name, so the ship being called "Lexx" seems appropriate than calling it "LEXX"
--DiSSo 29 June 2005 19:10 (UTC)
I quite agree.
I was the original designer of the LEXX logo back in the winter of 1996. We had intended to call the show The Dark Zone and all the pre-production design work in the fall of ’95 was so labelled. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortuitously) we couldn’t get clearance to use that name, and so the show’s iconoclastic creator Paul Donovan decided to call it “LEXX” —after his buddy and co-writer, Lex Gigeroff. 
Though not an acronym, the logo has always been rendered in caps. In the scripts, Lexx was used when characters were directly addressing the ship, and the Lexx used when referring to it in the third person. (At no point did we ever explain where the name came from.)
Personally, I think the two articles should be combined, "LEXX" should always be used when referring to the show, and the ship referred to as "the Lexx". --OldCommentator 16:43, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put the merge template on this article and LEXX. (I don't have time to do the merge myself, at the moment.) After the merge, the articles can be correctly renamed. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 17:07, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
Asside from the name issue, shouldn't the Lexx ship be distinct from the entirety of the Lexx series.  I vote that the name of the article be changed but that the two remain seperate.  However if I am the only one whom feels this way I differ the the speaker whom has actually worked on the show. MaximusNukeage 04:57, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I've name the renamings now. We now have The Lexx (the ship) and LEXX (the show). I also copied the old talk page text here. I didn't do the merge. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 12:50, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
Agreed — LEXX should refer to the show; Lexx should refer to the ship, or the Lexx, alternatively.  I think the Lexx (both italicised) is superfluous, as in the Enterprise.
As well, the two concepts should remain united in one article until there's reason or cause (e.g., enough material) to justify a new article.  E Pluribus Anthony 05:44, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  LEXX vs Lexx
Talk:Rennell Rodd, 1st Baron Rennell

message: List of Ambassadors from the United Kingdom to Switzerland lists him (without dates), but this biography does not.  Which is right?  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither Who's Who or ODNB have him down as ambassador to Switzerland, only 'president of the court of conciliation between Austria and Switzerland'.  I think the list is wrong. - Crosbiesmith (talk) 15:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switzerland
Talk:Richard Chaloner, 1st Baron Gisborough

message: Can anyone tell me the origins of the Godolphin and the Walmesley middle names? user:Eltharian 15 April 2007
:The name of Godolphin came into the Long family after the marriage in 1760 of Richard Long of Rood Ashton, to Meliora Lambe. Her parents had died & her guardian was William Godolphin, though I'm not sure of his exact relationship. Her great aunt Ruth Lambe (dau of Sir John Lambe) m. Sir William Godolphin. They lived at Coulston, Wiltshire. I have not investigated them further than this.
 
:The name Walmesley was introduced when Richard & Meliora's granddaughter Ellen Long married John Walmesley in 1812, 3rd s. of John, Esq., of The Hall of Ince, Preston, Lancs. and Mary, dau. of William Shaw, of Singleton, Lancs.Brograve 22:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of Godolphin & Walmesley names
Talk:Richard Lyon-Dalberg-Acton, 2nd Baron Acton

message: The degree to which he could be described as a politican, against his long diplomatic service which ended in 1920, and in comparison to his father (who was also Commons MP) may be questionable.  He is not known to have taken part in local government in England and his involvement in Parliament was limited to his seat in the House of Lords (assuming he took it and participated regularly - could he have sat when he was not yet naturalised?)  Needs checking.Cloptonson (talk) 08:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Box - Politician?

message: I hope to input details of his diplomatic career cited to various reference works.  I have drawn on Burke's Peerage, Who Was Who and Kelly's Handbook, checking different year volumes of his lifetime.  I notice discrepancies between these sources in the dates given for some of his positions so I may not date all of them if there is a conflict.  It will give users with more precise sources to investigate a leg-up!Cloptonson (talk) 08:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Diplomatic Career

message: There is a contradiction: Was she married to Richard until 1924, or did she die in 1923? Dfcorrea00 (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: she died in 1923, according to the obituary published in The Times on 20 March 1923. That was a Tuesday, the obituary says she died on the Saturday which would be the 17th. DuncanHill (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Acton
Talk:WUFM

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I changed the listing of radio stations to an alphabetical list. I figured this looked cleaner and would be easier to use. Please let me know if you disagree with this. Also, I do not know the call numbers for the Zanesville station. If anybody could find that out, it would be greatly appreciated! 174.101.22.20 (talk) 02:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification to current stations
Talk:Montagu Island

message: Can anybody add information about the total area and the number of population in this island and the other islands of the South Sandwich Islands? --Wisamzaqoot (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More details needed

message: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22mount+belinda%22+OR+%22mt+belinda%22+OR+%22mounts+belinda%22+OR+%22mts+belinda%22+OR+%22mount+oceanite%22+OR+%22mt+oceanite%22+OR+%22mts+oceanite%22+OR+%22mounts+oceanite%22+OR+%22isla+montagu%22+OR+%22montagu+island%22+OR+%22montagu+islands%22+&btnG= Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: https://books.google.ch/books?hl=de&lr=&id=Xqw7AQAAMAAJ perhaps as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to use
Talk:Naresh Dadhich (physicist)

message: This is now a disambig page, not a biography. Boud (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here's the history of the three Naresh Dadhich related en.Wikipedia pages, as far as I've been involved:
* Naresh Dadhich - now a disambiguation page 
** started as  by User:Nareshdadhich, with no references, looking very much like a "here's my CV" page
**  containing a mix of ND the political scientist and ND the physicist - the person adding the physicist content didn't seem bothered about such a "dual-born" professor born both in 1944 and 1957 
**  by me
*  created by me on 23:44, 17 March 2008‎ with my edit comment (disambiguation - source from original ambiguous page), using content from the original page and adding one external reference (that seems to be a dead link now)
**  with edit comment (Deb moved page Naresh Dadhich (political scientist) to Draft:Naresh Dadhich (political scientist) without leaving a redirect: not fit for article space).
*  created by me 23:44, 17 March 2008 with edit comment (disambiguation - source from original ambiguous page, but completely rewriting for obvious copyright reasons)
Boud (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Draft:Naresh_Dadhich_(political_scientist) is being proposed for deletion, on the grounds that it's an autobiography and would be unlikely to pass WP:PROF, even with a lot of work done to improve the page. The content is available at the 12:59, 21 March 2007‎ link above with essentially no changes, in case someone wants to use it to search for RS's. Boud (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit history - for convenience
Talk:Challenge of Barletta

message: User:Umbertogershon inserted this list in the article a few months ago, but it was poorly formatted, not in English, and unreferenced anyway.  I am pasting it as preformatted text, in case anyone cares to confirm it an enter it in table format:
   Italiani 	   Cavalieri 	    Francesi
Ettore Fieramosca 	            Charles de Torgues
Francesco Salamone 	            Marc de Frigne
Marco Corollario 	            Girout de Forses
Riccio da Parma 	            Claude Grajan d'Aste
Guglielmo Albimonte 	            Martellin de Lambris
Mariano Abignente 	            Pierre de Liaye
Giovanni Capoccio 	            Jacques de la Fontaine
Giovanni Brancaleone 	            Eliot de Baraut
Ludovico Abenavolo 	            Jean de Landes
Ettore Giovenale 	            Sacet de Sacet
Fanfulla da Lodi 	            François de Pise
Romanello da Forlì 	            Jacques de Guignes
Miale da Troia 	                    Naute de la Fraise
                Giudici
Francesco Zurlo 	 Lionnet Du Breuil[10]
Diego Vela 	         Monsieur de Murtibrach
Francesco Spinola    	 Monsieur de Bruet
Alonzo Lopez 	         Etum Sutte  
                 Ostaggi
Angelo Galeotta 	Monsieur de Musnai
Albernuccio Valga 	Monsieur de Dumoble
— Eoghanacht talk 13:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced list of challengers 
Talk:TosMIC

message: * http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/eros/articles/rt150/abstract-fs.html e-EROS Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis
* "p-Toluenesulfonylmethyl Isocyanide: a Versatile Synthon in Organic Chemistry", Sulfur reports (2003) 24, 307-385
* "Synthetic Uses of Tosylmethyl Isocyanide (TosMIC)", Organic Reactions (2001) 57
* "4-Toluenesulfonylmethyl isocyanide (TosMIC). A versatile formaldehyde equivalent with reversed polarity", J. Prakt. Chem. (1998) 340, 483-485
Ben (talk) 00:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: The WikiProject classification for TosMIC is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  20:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please confirm classification
Talk:Stanley Holmes, 1st Baron Dovercourt

message: I have altered all references to him in wikipedia to describe him in 1918 as a Liberal rather than a Coalition Liberal. This reflects the description given to him in Craig and Debrett's and a number of 1918 newspaper sources. I have not found a source that describes him as a Coalition Liberal in 1918 or a National Liberal in 1922. Graemp (talk) 07:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Party label

message: This article is really great, very high quality. Thanks to . --Sunderlandweary (talk) 13:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  excellent article
Talk:Thomas Legh, 2nd Baron Newton

message: I've changed the first reference for the article  from an indication of a public domain source to specific attribution to a copyrighted source. DNB/ODNB only publishes articles after death, so a 1944 death wom't be part of  public domain. I believe the passages referenced here are an appropriate paraphrase of the source they cite. As always, other opinions are welcome here. Franamax (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution change 
Talk:Natalie Trundy

message: Hi
This has been problematic before, but it does need adressing now we have had the discussions elsewhere about those edits.
Is her name Trundy Campana, Trundy Campagna, or does it even matter?
So far, we have two sources in the article, bith with one vote for each option:
Trundy Campana from the "Official Natalie Trundy site"
Trundy Capagna from The Eagle "Natalies mother is Irish, her father Italian. She was born Natalie Trundy Campagna.
No idea what this is, but it seems unreliable sourcing as I suspect it is a user-created content site (login at top right)
The others do not mention her other name, they simply mention her as "Natalie Trundy".
Only ever mentions of "Natalie Trundy" from Chicago Trib.
I am reluctant to remove the name, but with no reliable sourcing - apart from two conflicting spellings.
I feel we should either leave out the Campana/Campagna and stick with "Natalie Trundy", or include both as "Natalie Trundy, born Natlie Trundy (Campana/Campagna)". Chaosdruid (talk) 16:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that before he was indefinitely blocked, one of our former editors (User:Anthony22) felt strongly that we should change the name based on his personal knowledge. I can tell that you feel strongly as well, given the statement in all caps there. I think this is the difficulty: Wikipedia:Verifiability is considered one of Wikipedia's core content policies, and it says: "Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Campagna, Campana, or just Trundy?

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 14:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:NBC page

message: *Greetings, I created this new NBC page article today and hope to expand it with more notable people who got their start in show business this way JGHowes talk -  02:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Pterygium (eye)

message: Please see Wikipedia:Technical terms and definitions and try to improve this article.  Thanks.  --SueHay 02:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article discusses an eye problem but the
photo, :Image:Pterygium.jpg is of the mouth. Jidanni (talk) 23:28, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What the heck are you talking about?  That's a pterygium operation on someone's left eye.Iulus Ascanius (talk) 03:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Go easy on him, maybe he needs an eye operation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.208.192.86 (talk) 08:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eye problem but photo is mouth 

message: I do volunteer work at a free medical clinic in a border Mexican town.  Our surgeries are often to remove these from the eyes.  We do about 8 a month.  A numbing shot is given in the inside crease in the lower lid, and then the doctor removes it with a scapel.    And the rates are right -- we do about one woman per 10 men.  The ages we've done since I've been there have been in the late 20s and in the 40s.  The surgery is quick, with few side effects.  To prevent these, it's best for those in hot dusty windy areas to wear sunglasses starting at an early age.   Our clinic gives out sunglasses to as many eye patients as we have, to help prevent this.   Also, use of eye drops seem to help prevent them.  If it gets into the pupil area, it will grow in there and cause blindness.  That is what I've learned so far.  Thank you for letting me share this info with you folks! 
Zingingablenessedly (talk) 04:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved into new section here (was part of previous section). I leave to editors of this page analysis of the information kindly offered. Facts707 (talk) 10:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surgery details, prevention, etc. information offered 

message: "There is a new and effective treatment using Mitomycin .01% solution (Mobius makes a kit) to keep the Pterygium from recurring. Please do some further research before deciding to do some of these outdated procedures."
This content is unsupported and adopts an advisory rather than informational approach.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeinnEighe (talk • contribs) 01:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misfitting sentences 

message: It appears that content at  should belong here as it is detailed information about the eye disorder and not generally about pterygium as a wing-like structure or disambiguation information. Facts707 (talk) 10:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose, on the grounds that while there may be some reorganization of material, there shouldn't be a merge; rather, we should keep WP:SUMMARY form. I note that the main template is already appropriately in place at Pterygium#Pterygium of the eye. Klbrain (talk) 15:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given this uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 11:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of section [[Pterygium#Ptergyium of the eye]] to here