lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Institute for Advanced Studies (Vienna)

message: I placed this article, because Hashem Pesaran attended it, and it was founded by Oskar Morgenstern, father of game theory. It will be expanded. These speedy deletions are annoying.
--Dirknachbar 16:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't know anything about any "Institute for Advanced Studies."
 
There was, and is, an Internation Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, address: Schloss Laxenberg, Vienna, Austria.
 
Anatol Rapoport was co-Director of it, with Roger Levien on loan from RAND, during the late 1960s -- not the 1980s, as the article suggests.
 
The Institute carried on a variety of interesting interactions with the Soviet Union during those years.
 
More recently it has drifted into, um, applied systems analysis, of which a typical example might be its project to increase the inventory of "above ground lumber," i.e. trees, by a hundred billion tons in the next hundred years.
 
The Institute has a Wiki page I see, and its web page is http://www.iiasa.ac.at/
David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, maybe?
Talk:Francis D. K. Ching

message: This article is the second of two articles on Frank Ching.  The only difference is that the other, more complete article, lists Ching as Francis D.K. Ching -- no space between the D. and the K. 
Since the other article is more complete, I suggest this one be deleted and new information from this article should be transferred to the other article. Kentucknob (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rifle, Colorado

message: The article contains the comment that oil shale is “unreliable.” What is that supposed to mean? Does it mean that it’s only unreliable if its oil production is cut off for political reasons, or what? Where is a footnote  justifying this comment? 63.155.42.108 (talk) 07:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oil Shale Comment
Talk:EKA (supercomputer)

message: Cleanup done on 16 September 2011.
*Material without reference deleted.
*All links checked and fixed.
*Ranking updated
Kenfyre 13:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Done

message: This article seems like (it is) a direct copy of Tata's Press Release (link)
-- Subbu (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Paste 

message: The raking of the supercomputers in made solely by http://www.top500.org/ and not by any other company. The lists on their website are the correct references unlike other websites which might be outdated:  June 2008 list and November 2008 list. Happy editing, --STTW (talk) 08:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking 
Talk:ARCA Menards Series

message: Since it came up in a relevant AfD discussion that I recently took part in, I was wondering if the wording in the lede should be changed from “minor but professional” to “minor semi-professional” because many of these guys simply do it as an expensive hobby. Not saying there aren’t guys out there who make a living off of it, but to me I don’t think ARCA is a fully professional league. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:49, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Professional”
Template talk:Cross Country Route RDT

message: I hope this isn't wandering in services area. I added university as it is served by a large number of trains on the Cross Country Route. -- Simply south (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But do the (long distance) Cross Country trains stop at University? I was under the impression only the (Birmingham) Cross-City service (which has its own route map) stopped there, hence the reason why I removed several of the minor stations not used by long distance services. If you so wish, I can dig out the atlas and add all the stations between York and Bristol/Cardiff, but in my opinion that would make the template very large. --Stewart (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Oops - found University has now joined the Cross Country route (Nottingham - Cardiff trains) - part of the ex-Central Trains services. --Stewart (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. They do run at University it seems every about 2 hours. I've also readded but as a branch the cross-city line. Btw, when you half undid my edit, it made Redditch appear but as though trains only ran out of and back the station without gong anywhere! -- Simply south (talk) 18:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: University

message: Should this line be in blue (as in tramway/light railway)? Useddenim (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly don't know. If it should be, it'll need editing at Birmingham to Worcester via Bromsgrove Line too. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadbury Railway and Wharf 

message: This template needs to be cut down significantly. It's supposed to be transcluded to Cross Country Route, but that fails, which means that the template instead shows as a bluelink at the top-left of the lead section; and it also puts the page into . --Redrose64 (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated all BSicons (and also textual links), and introduced as many complex icons as possible; and more significantly, replaced all  with . This proved enough for the template to be transcluded properly into the article; however, it still gets some navboxes bluelinked instead of transcluded. YLSS (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was exceeding the limits again. Having previously removed all of the secondary navigation-boxes, I've resorted to substituting this template in Cross Country Route. So anytime this template is updated (hopefully not too often), it will need to be re-substituted. – Wbm1058 (talk) 20:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: Why does the route plan show Moseley between Five Ways and Granville Street? Surely the line never went anywhere near Moseley, which is a couple of miles away from both those stations, on a completely different line.--Shantavira|feed me 11:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly left over from when this RDT included the Camp Hill route (some Bristol-Manchester services go that way, in order to avoid reversal at BNS). I removed it --Redrose64 (talk) 14:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moseley
Talk:Westport United F.C.

message: *This includes "They have brought colour and panache to the game with their Super League victory in 2002 and the wonderful cup runs undertaken since. They came within a game of retaining their Super League crown last year and on Sunday last they became the first club to inscribe their name for the second time on the Tom Kelly Cup."
*This is from County Roscommon. 
*This refers to some sort of court case. 
*This seems to suggest they have won the FAI Junior Cup. 
*This includes awards.
*This says "Though Westport United are to carve there own little niche in history next Sunday, for one covey man it’s a case of been there, done that and got the t-shirt".
*This is a radio programme about the ladies' team.
*This describes some medals for the ladies.
*1987 Connacht Cup winning team.
And so on. Hope that's enough. --candle•wicke 02:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources to contest PROD
Talk:Heike Hanada

message: Somebody, editing under a couple of IPs, has been trying to propose this article for deletion. The subject clearly has enough of a claim to notability not to be deleted without a debate, so PROD isn't the way to go. It needs a proper WP:AFD discussion. And once a PROD has been challenged, it cannot be restored. If you are editing as an IP and know enough to add a PROD template in the first place, you should also know this.
An additional point: if one feels a need to PROD an article, one should inform watchers what one is doing by leaving an edit summary to that effect. It is also a good idea to add a rationale less flimsy than "insufficient notability". (How is this notability insufficient? What is missing that you would expect from a more notable architect?) --Hegvald (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 
Talk:Battle of Abukir (1801)

message: The qualification 'tactical' would appear to be redundant. Is a victory not a victory?
In  some Wikipedia articles  the word 'tactical' is inserted  when contributors wish to suggest that a victory was of limited importance because it was either not decisive or not the prelude to a victorious campaign. 
In this case,  the successful action was clearly crucial since had the landings been defeated the expedition would have foundered, and the subsequent campaign was victorious, thus rendering the qualification  doubly redundant.
I shall amend accordingly.
JF42 (talk) 18:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tactical British victory
Talk:Hugo Kraas

message: Please let me know if there are any concerns / feedback. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup 

message: Marginally meets GNG as a war criminal & due to his connection to Jochen Peiper: link. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Bani Yas

message: It has been pointed out that there are no reliable sources to support that these two families belong to Bani Yas. When unrefereced material like this is challenged by an editor, it should either be sourced, or removed. I'll tag them with Template:CN for now. Mohamed CJ (talk) 02:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The video currently linked (this) shows a voice interview with Sultan bin Mohamed Al-Qasimi in which he states that al-Bloush are Arabs descended from Mohammed al-Daramka. Without commenting on the reliability of the source, it should be noted that no mention is made of Bani Yas. Mohamed CJ (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Mansoori & Al Bloushi 
Talk:HMS Glatton (1871)

message: "In reality, her lack of freeboard would appear to have precluded any operations whatsoever except those in calm weather and smooth water."
Is this a recorded fact, or is this someone's opinion? Do we have a verified source for this 'claim'? It is phrased in a curiously speculative manner for encyclopedic content.
Further, has there been any attempt to reconcile the claimed supposed 'vagueness' of the ship's purpose (something which the luminary Reed was very well clear of determining for himself in any case) with the Fourth Sea Lord's* proposed role for the ship (dual-purpose coast defence and attack) - as given in the article?
* (ought to be capitalised in the article - I will attend to this)
Is this article, as it stands, in part based upon and thus contaminated by Reed's very obvious politicking within the Admiralty, backed up by writers blithely gulping down Reed's Kool-Aid? I feel it would be better to state that Reed claimed a certain thing, when it is clearly contradicted in the very next line.
I will happily help with overhauling this article. 2A00:23C7:3131:FE01:DD09:B01D:CB11:6675 (talk) 01:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion?
Talk:List of Kyōryū Sentai Zyuranger characters

message: Please clean this up... It is really a big summary of inuniverse plot information.  -- Pilotbob (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Re-tagging a completely-unsourced, probably non-notable article for copyediting may be seen as disruptive. Please don't waste our time; ensure that an article meets the GNG before tagging it for a copyedit. Miniapolis 13:32, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement of copyedit tag
Talk:Jat Mahasabha

message: Jat Mahasabha is separate organization from  Jat Samaj Kalyan Parishad. hence these can not be merged.-- burdak (talk) 17:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This may give rise to community rivalry and liable to be deleted.Drkyt (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not a valid reason for deletion. See WP:DEL#REASON. utcursch | talk 17:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete 

message: Links to main article jat people. Pointless to keep.Heba Aisha (talk) 09:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding removal of origin from Shiva locks
Talk:HRX

message: Agree that these two pages should be merged.  As to what the most appropriate location for gene pages, I generally believe it should be the gene symbol from Entrez Gene (or Ensembl).  In this case, it is 'MLL', but MLL was already taken as a redirect page (which I then changed to a disambig page).  Then, because the official gene name "Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia (trithorax homolog, Drosophila)" seemed like a mouthful, I think I pretty much randomly selected one of the remaining gene aliases.  I don't see MLL1 as an official alias -- where did you get that from?  Then again, searches in Pubmed seem to suggest that either is reasonable.  Can you just do the merge to which ever page you feel is appropriate (or flip a coin if you're also ambivalent)?  If an expert on this gene comes along and wants to move it to a better location later, I'd support that as well...  -- AndrewGNF (talk) 17:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I got the MLL1 name from the comment that inspired me to create the article on it. (0: O.K., i'll think and move the contents to one of the pages (gone lookin' for a coin). CopperKettle (talk) 02:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since there are no objections, I merged the contents of HRX to HLL (gene), the official HUGO name for these gene.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[MLL1]] or [[HRX]]
Talk:San Pedro Cutud Lenten Rites

message: Can someone help me create an article about Crucifixion in the Philippines not solely focus on only one person , Their are alot of people in the Philippines that re enacts that Crucifixion of Christ. I think this would be a good article. I just don't know how to start it up. 18:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crucifixion in the Philippines
Talk:HESA Shahed 278

message: For the second time, I have moved the article to the corrct full title per the WP:AIR/PC naming conventions for aircrafts, which is "COmapny, designation/name", according to the information provided in the sources. I have also rewritten the Lead sentence in accordance with these guidelins, and removed the non-English script from the Infobox title field. Please refrain from undoing these changes again, and instead discuss why you believe the guidelines should not apply in this case. Thanks for your hard wark in preparing this article, but please realize that you do not OWN the page, and that there are guidelines for a standardized format for aircraft airticles that needs to be followed in most cases, including those from Iran. Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. - BillCJ (talk) 17:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name and other changes

message: So what about these: http://www.defence.pk/forums/iranian-defence/170689-shahed-278-helicopter.html and especially these: http://www.palba.cz/forumfoto/albums/userpics/13199/IRN_Shahed278_01.jpg Gatrika (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: from the photos you provided and an article I added I can count at least 7-8 different copies (the 6 in one photo, one is hidden, the rotor can be seen), the OH model and a light blue one in another. At the time being I updated the number to 6 and referenced the 2 photos in mehrnews article. I guess we can assume mass-production and with for further official announcements. Sarmadys (talk) 15:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Number built 3"?
Talk:Karl-Friedrich Höcker

message: Someone should probably have a look at merging the two halves of this article. Gab.popp (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be great, if we could see the actual (forensic) evidence against him. It seems he disputed what he was accused of. 105.0.5.188 (talk) 09:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit sections?
Talk:E. E. Waddell High School

message: There does not appear to be much substantial material at the Waddell High School Stadium article, and it seems doomed to be a permanent stub.  Given the utter lack of information out in the world regarding this stadium, it seems reasonable to merge the little information we do have into this article.  If no one can provide a good reason not to, I will boldly perform the merge in a week or so.  --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed.  I have retained all of the information from the stadium article, and merged it into a new section.  --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Waddell Stadium article into this one
Talk:Aston Martin V8 Zagato

message: From the articles I used to read about this car, I always thought that it's proper title was "V8 Vantage Zagato".
LewisR (talk) 11:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  V8 Zagato 
Talk:Aston Martin V8

message: I have seen the "Oscar India" specification referenced often in magazines and books dealing with Aston Martins, but have never seen an explanation for that odd title. Can someone explain, preferably within the article, what the title "Oscar India" refers to? Duncan1800 (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "OI" refers to October 1, I will include it in the article if it isn't already there.  Mr.choppers | ✎  08:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Oscar India

message: I belive that the Aston Martin V8 Vantage (1977) ought to be merged into this page as it is largely the same car - in the US market, they even shared engine specifications.  Mr.choppers | ✎  08:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, no need for its own page. <B>Warren</B> (talk) 10:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Disagree; It was a disrete and important model in the Aston range, and had a very different specification from the standard and US Market cars. The cars it competed with were also very different.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beltane43 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It had an engine in a higher state of tune, and some body modifications. A V8 Vantage is a boyhood dream of mine, but I nonetheless am compelled to admit that it is essentially just a GTi version of the V8. The US market Vantage didn't even get the more powerful engine!  Mr.choppers | ✎  00:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Unlike say the DB4 and DB4 Vantage, the V8 and V8 Vantage were sold as different models by Aston rather than a different engine spec. Also, for what it's worth, they are separate entries on Aston's heritage website; http://www.astonmartin.com/heritage/past-models. Hennelly14 (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Aston Martin page also consider the DB7 Vantage and the DB7 Vantage Volante separate models, when the only difference is that one is a convertible. I don't know what you mean by "were sold as different models by Aston"? The only difference is some very light cosmetic alterations and sometimes a higher tuned engine.  Mr.choppers | ✎  00:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In the same way that the DBS was sold as a different model from the DB9. Technically the DBS was a DB9 with slight body alterations, a more powerful engine and some other small changes. However it is still regarded as a distinct model from the DB9 as opposed to just a DB9-plus, like how the V8 Vantage isn't just a V8-plus. This website goes into a bit more detail. Hennelly14 (talk) 21:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:الشيخ جلال الدين الصغير

message: copied from article page:
this article should not be deleted as it talks about a known iraqi politician, and an article has been written about him in english, under the name Jalal al deen alsaghir
* This content should be merged into that article then. If you want to create a page in Arabic, use the Arabic version of Wikipedia. -- -- Dougie WII (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Globaloria

message: My feeling is that this article would benefit from a "tightening" of the text. ---- Stormbay (talk) 18:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean up and shorten ? 

message: The way this article was written sounds like it was by a member of Globaloria or the World Wide Workshop people.
It uses the word "student" in the article more than what would be exactly needed in it.
I suggest it be written to not include such words as "innovative" (and/or variations thereof) or "immersive".
There is also no need for the tagline of one of the members either, as that itself makes it seem if it was written by a member of their staff.
I'd rewrite it myself, but I don't know enough of the topic to do so. 168.216.16.50 (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Way The Article Was Written...
Talk:Doctor Who: DWO Whocast

message: The references in this article are all internal to DWO, rather than independent. And the OG link is to the front page of the forum, rather than the particular thread - the comment is unlikely to be representative anyway.
This popular podcast has been on the go for a while though and there is bound to be independent sources which the article could cite; for instance, are there any DWM mentions (an issue and page reference), or possibly newspaper or radio mentions, or reviews in DWAS publications. This sort of thing would beef up the article's independent POV, and tackle the notability query. ---- The Missing Hour (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finding reliable independent sources
Talk:Hitcents

message: Much of this article is simple copy-and-paste from the company website. The company is notable enough (IMO) for an article, but it needs work. I will do what I can over the next few weeks. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Realkyhick marked this as an advert back in 2007.  The issues have either reappear or were never resolved.  I would like to work to clean up this page to be in line with Wikipedia's standards.
Looking over the history, most of the edits seem to be coming from one user and one IP in particular.  All of the edits from both the user and the IP seem to revolve around the Mills family interests.  I'm going to go out on a limb and say that this is probably a slew of self-edits.
--Navi555 (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert & Resume Tags

message: Requesting update to Hitcents' services section - add video game publishing. 
  http://www.hitcents.com  Reflects focus on game publishing
  http://www.gamespress.com/product.asp?c=1a89f9--67719  Press release regarding game published by Hitcents
  http://www.gamespress.com/release.asp?c=ae91f7--167471  Press release regarding game published by Hitcents
Hitcents (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Request - [Services]
Talk:BMW 7 Series (E23)

message: I'm trying to learn the lineage of the BMW's, and am wondering if someone can explain why they list model number E21, etc., instead of something like '92-94 318, '94-98 325, etc. Also if it is possible to have the model numbers also in the same summary/lineage tree. Say something like the Volvo lineage tree that actually lists each year and model.
Thanks for any help.
99.228.169.213 (talk) 19:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Committee of Interns and Residents

message: Hello Wikipedians, 
I am the communications coordinator for the Committee of Interns and Residents.  I was reviewing this page and noticed it was a bit sparse on information.  I'm providing some updates to this page in efforts to keep the information current. For the sake of transparency, it is important that the Wikipedia editing community be aware that following changes and additions have been made: 
1.) An organization box with membership, leadership, and affiliation (with SEIU) information
2.) The mission statement of the organization, paraphrased and/or expressed in the third person as appropriate
3.) Updated membership and participation figures 
4.) Further Reading 
Thank you for your assistance, feedback, and ongoing contributions
Cirseiu (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2011 (UTC)