Talk:Multiple drafts model

message: "and the possibility of philosophical zombies" this sentence is inherently misleading to what dennet was trying to say. he was trying to say that the defintions under which such notions as thooughts and feelings were explained in relation to the "philosophical zombie" meant that in these ways we are all philosophical zombies because the notions are nonsensical or misleading.
if you look back at his book, he described(it was almost a turing like description): that if something could act so like a human in all ways and under any scrutiny not come under doubt as to it being human then in no way could it ever not be human: it simply is human, because it would be impossible to replicate such behaviour and body-structure in that much depth.
this is what i got from it anyway, if you think i am incorrect i would like some feed back: my email is burtcataract@hotmail.com
and don't give me arguments in the vein of an intuition pump to do with blade runner (they weren't really robots, they were actors...hehehe)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.47.202.4 (talk) 04:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "philosophical zombies"

message: I have amended the entry to demonstrate the background to Multiple Drafts. Yes Dennett is an extremist in the field of consciousness studies and an encyclopedia article should make this clear. loxley 16:59, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: background to Multiple Drafts

message: I am disappointed!! Here is a rough but accurate definition of operationalism:
the doctrine that the meaning of a proposition consists of the operations involved in proving or applying it 
Dennett's position is called instrumentalism because it is indifferent with regard to the ontological and truth-functional status of mental phenomena. The concern is with the utility and and predictive efficay of modes of explnation and so on. This is a whopping error which I mnoticed right way and have corrected. But this article does indeed need to be examined very carefully.--Lacatosias 10:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operationalism and Instrumentalism 

message: What does the reference "(Korb 1993)" refers to? --damiens.rf 14:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's "''(Korb 1993)''" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Multiple drafts model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051121095257/http://ase.tufts.edu:80/cogstud/papers/multdrft.htm to http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/multdrft.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Multiple drafts model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040618132921/http://www.philosophers.co.uk/cafe/phil_apr2003.htm to http://www.philosophers.co.uk/cafe/phil_apr2003.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060105051827/http://cogprints.org/266/00/selfctr.htm to http://cogprints.org/266/00/selfctr.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051211123706/http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v1/psyche-1-04-korb.html to http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v1/psyche-1-04-korb.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified