lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:SS Torrey Canyon

message: Deleted some text apparently copied from The Scilly News, March 2007.  The rest of the text needs line-by-line comparison to ensure it isn't also copied.LeadSongDog (talk) 04:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: from Tim Farrow RAF Chivenor aircrew on BBC Radio 4 - Saturday Live, 8 May 2010 -- John (Daytona2 ·  Talk ·  Contribs) 08:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Eywitness account

message: Over thirty years ago I had occasion to research the disaster and so no longer have references, but two things were clear. 1. There was no good concept of what to do. 2. Any and every idea that anyone had was tried somewhere, no matter how crazy the idea. What has become clear since then is the only technology that has improved is the technology of public relations, and the technical "fixes" are the same things invented then, but worse, the mistakes in use are still the same as was realized even then. Of particular note bad ideas in the use of booms as a parallel barrier as opposed to a diagonal funneling to concentrate the oil to a containment location was noted then, but still done today.  
There were extensive lists of all the ideas that were tried, and a fair description of the results of those attempts. If someone has access to them, that would be much more useful a Wiki than the time and place. I have only memories to refer to, but the supposed existence of an "adequate plan" was not among those memories, and considering that such a plan does even now not exist, I think that that reference should be removed, and if there were any plan then it should be linked to and the pejorative "adequate" still not be included.Dragonwlkr (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Despite numerous oil tanker sinkings by submarines in WWII, one suggestion was to burn the TC's oil off.  You can tell how clueless someone (PR/manager) is when they suggest burning oil off. This might have been the event for research in dispersants. 143.232.210.38 (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  There was no "Adequate" plan submitted then or now. 

message: So I cannot find a reference for BP being operator rather than chartered of the Torrey Canyon? --BozMo talk 08:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure that you are a native speaker of English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.175.160 (talk) 16:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bit puzzled

message: german wikipedia says, the remaining front half after the refurbishment was being used afterwards. Have a look there and tell us more? --Anidaat (talk) 11:20, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued use declared in the German Wikipedia 

message: The phrase "citation needed" is in the text about the depth of the wreck. The depth of the sea at that point is available in charts, I imagine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.175.160 (talk) 16:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Gitlow v. New York

message: I don't know how to format this well, but Today 2/19 I deleted the obvious spam on the page, I think some of the actual content was delete. Cameron  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.233.199 (talk) 03:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't know

message: Hi!  I just wiki'ed this "bad tendency test" thing, and it turns out to be identical to the "clear and present danger" test established by Schenck v. United States.  How did the "bad tendency test" come out of the Abrams v. United States case, then?  Please straighten this out.
Thanks,
Yu Han  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.68.211 (talk) 21:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear and Present Danger Clause/Bad Tendency Test 

message: Did the Supreme Court ever revisit this issue later?  It seems to have a very negative effect on First Amendment rights, so I wondered if it had ever been challenged in more modern times.  It also seems rather contradictory, given that the U.S. was formed by people advocating the violent overthrow of their government.  - Connelly (talk) 02:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I found the Smith Act, which revisited this issue.  - Connelly (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any rulings later? 

message: I don't think the full name of this case is 'Benjamin Gitlow v. People of the State of Miguel.' Can someone confirm? WhittleMario (talk) 15:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Miguel' is not a state
Talk:José Moñino, 1st Count of Floridablanca

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no consensus. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 10:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Questions (game)

message: Should this article be written using declarative statements? --Anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.149.20 (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What's Questions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.141.194.123 (talk) 04:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't you read the article? 152.91.9.219 (talk) 03:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Should I?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.66.8.79 (talk) 20:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :I would be interested in hearing evidence suporting the claim that Stoppard invented this game.
:You're right, it is scored like tennis - by fouls. If your opponent fouls out, you get points.
:-Freekee (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stoppard 

message: Is this a real game? Did it ever exist prior to Stoppard's play? Is there more than one occurence of this outside the play? Does it have any more than one reference? Does it really merit its own article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:4000:A875:4463:206F:E4B0:35DD (talk) 04:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this game really exist?
Talk:Le Silence de la mer (1949 film)

message: I am going to change the date for this film from 1947 to 1949.  This is according to the dates on imdb. Estrose 16:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: We have Mer in the article title, but mer in the headword. Which is it? Loganberry (Talk) 13:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, in the article title Silence is capitalized, but mer is lowercase. They should either both be capitalized (standard for English) or both be lowercase (standard for French). I prefer the former, but, as I don't have an account, I can't change the name of an article.--97.113.193.191 (talk) 12:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title capitalisation 
Talk:Superior Saturday

message: It says the release date is 1st of July in the UK however i pre-ordered from amazon and got the book on the 30th of July, so i dont know isnt the release date the 30th of June and not the 1st of july? 11:18, 30 June 2008 (GMT)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.128.241 (talk)  
Is there actually a release date??? This is very important because yesterday (1st of June) I went to my bookstore and actually bought the book?? But If its meant to be released a lot later, than what is actually the release date? Im in Australia, so its due to be released next month?? What?? Zzz sleeping (talk) 02:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - Has the cover actually been released like it says in this page? I tried searching for it, but couldn't find an image, & there wasn't an image in the links or the official site.
If not, I think that should be edited. If it is out, could we get an image of it uploaded? (21.1.08)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.105.112 (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, there has been no cover released, and the reference cited does not provide a cover. I have removed that statement pending verification. seresin || wasn't he just...? 23:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a link to the cover. http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/imageviewer.asp?ean=9780439700894 Mollymoon (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

text: The original references do now have the U.K.'s cover.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.224.209 (talk) 16:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: What's his name? He starts out as Whrod, and it says that for a while. Then his name apparently changes to Whron, and never changes back. Why is that? Mollymoon (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whrod? Whron? 

message: I think that some of the information in Characters should be moved into the plot, as the section should really be a description of the characters, and not their entire histories. There is a separate page for that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokepal101 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inter-Page "Merge"
Talk:Red Sovine

message: I converted most of the list of references to inline citations.  If anyone has access to The Encyclopedia of Country Music please convert that one as well.Tomsv 98 (talk) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline Citations 

message: The birth date listed in the article is 7th of July, but it is listed in the 17th on Wikidata. I checked many websites online on the subject and they don't agree on the date, and they're divided between 7 and 17.--Omar35880 (talk) 12:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date
Talk:Trade (disambiguation)

message: this page is kind of a piece. what can we do to fix the ambiguation problems associated with links that point here, or to trade? how bout trading? I see that history of trade is right under the TOC on trade. that's pretty prominent. I guess it would take a thorough look through special:whatlinkshere/trade, checking the context of each mention. anyone else thinkin about this?? I'll be around. Ka-zizzlMc 16:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Deringer

message: Actually, I think a better merger might be Deringer and Henry Deringer, as Deringer's only claim to fame was the Deringer pistols.  The modern derringer is only peripherally related to Deringer's work; they share common attributes (very compact) but the modern use of derringer specifically excludes revolvers or automatic pistols, neither of which were significantly availble in Deringer's time.  The modern derringer definition more directly traces its roots back to the Remington double derringer, which paved the way for tiny multi-barrel repeaters in the cartridge era.  scot 16:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Krypton-85

message: A sentence in the intro used to read as follows:
It decays into stable rubidium-85, with a half-life of 10.756 years and a maximum decay energy of 687 keV.
As written this could imply that the rubidium-85 as the half-life and decay energy listed.  I've edited this to make it more clear that it's the Kr-85 with the half-life and decay energy, and that the Rb-85 is not radioactive. -Helvetica (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting ambiguity in intro 

message: This article seems to contain a somewhat random collection of facts, with some incomplete info or outdated links.  I propose to undertake a bit of a refresh of the article. Will do this in pieces so there is opportunity for discussion. Gierszep (talk) 23:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article refresh
Talk:Washington Mutual

message: What happened to WaMu's "bright, new future" as a part of Chase Bank? 68.132.113.76 (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chased 

message: One of the best "free checking" WaMu ads was "Conversation".
Vimeo
Behance
It featured actor Don Lake as the bank teller.
I think the director was Christopher Guest.
I don't know who played the customer, but I've just tweeted about it and at-mentioned Mr. Lake, so maybe he will remember…. Walter Ian Kaye 00:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Conversation"
Talk:List of disasters in Canada

message: Does that really deserve the title "disaster". --Kuzwa (talk) 03:02, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elie Tronado 

message: A disaster doesn't have to be "notable" in the sense of having its own article, but to be listed should have at least a mention some place in wikipedia that we can link to.  I removed a couple that did not.  Dicklyon (talk) 15:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing criterion 

message: This event probably should have its own wikipedia page, but I don't have time to write one right now.  Dcowan38 (talk) 01:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sep 21, 2018 tornado family 

message: if there are other wildfires on this list, then why is the one that happened last summer in the nwt that burnt a bunch of buildings and evacuated a bunch of towns not listed?  - some bored kid at school 17:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: it appears that the wildfire also is not on the page about wildfires in canada, i feel like it should be there  - some bored kid at school 17:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  nwt wildfire evacuation
Talk:Hillcrest mine disaster

message: The Calgary Herald reported Hillcrest as the third worst mining disaster in the world, after a disaster in France and one in Germany, not Fraterville. Fraterville was mentioned in the article, but not as one of the worst. Fraterville colliery (200 dead), Albion colliery, Wales (286), and Jusovka colliery, Russia (200 dead), were all listed in the article and were also worse than Hillcrest.  Snowytreebranch (talk) 19:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the Introduction section
Talk:Modeling language

message: I disagree with merging this article into modeling language because this article is effectively serving a purpose: navigation.  I would like to see this expanded to allow the user to correctly browse to find the topic they are actually seeking, rather than to find a bare set of links.  --Nickmalik 14:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary 

message: This article or section appears to have been copied and pasted from various Wikipedia articles, possibly in violation of a copyright. This has occurred Sept  2008, when I expanded this article article. 
I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.
-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied and pasted from various Wikipedia articles 

message: * In this edtit text is copy/pasted from the Lepus3 article. 
* In this edtit some text is copy/pasted from the Flowchart, Jackson Structured Programming, Object Role Modeling, and Specification and Description Language articles. 
* In this edtit text is copy/pasted from the Algebraic modeling language, Domain-specific modeling, framework-specific modeling language, and Object modeling language articles. 
* In this edtit text is copy/pasted from the VRML article. 
-- Mdd (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration 
Talk:Generic Modeling Environment

message: I have just reverted a large addition of content, since it appears to be a direct copy of material from the GME website. Such a transfer of material is potentially a copyright violation, and is contrary to Wikipedia policies. If you are the contributor of this material, and do in fact have the copyrights to the material in question, please let me know. Thanks. --Allan McInnes (talk) 04:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable Copyright Violation
Talk:Wernicke's area

message: brodmann areas can be assumed rather than explicitly defined, especially since they are linked to. however "AF" is neither linked to nor defined. what do people think?
Belizefan (talk) 12:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: acronym reference

message: It could be useful to add some examples of how someone with this part of their brain damaged might talk and form sentences.
67.189.114.165 03:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might try aphasia.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 07:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It
Talk:Hope Slide

message: I did a panoramic image of the slide zone. It's apparently from more or less exactly the same place as the photo currently used in the article. I'm not sure which makes the better illustration, but I'm placing it here on the talk page and leaving it to someone else to decide which image is more appropriate. - Jmabel | Talk 04:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Obviously claiming the Hope Slide as the largest landslide ever recorded in Canada is historical. A somewhat larger landslide () occurred at Mount Meager in 2010. It should be updated. Volcanoguy 08:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest?
Talk:Pebble in the Sky

message: It doesn't have much to do with the story, and does not suggest a far-future Earth.  Are there any alternatives?  --GwydionM 17:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the cover on my edition, and unless somebody else has a different one I think it's stuck. JBK405 01:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Like everything else in the infobox, the first edition artwork is preferred, so I've gone ahead and added that. But that other image is pretty sweet too (when did we lose the ability to crank out a decent SF book cover?) so I moved it further on down the page. The "Cover Artist" portion of the infobox had been accredited to "Paul Lehr", however I did not know if that was specific to the Fawcett edition... if it is, feel free to add that in the thumb caption. -- Antepenultimate 03:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suitable cover?

message: Was this the first popular sf work to suggest the idea of the arbitrary euthanisation of the elderly as a societal norm? I'm sure it's where the writer of Logan's Run got the idea...wish I had time to check. Ellsworth 16:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Late reply, but ICYMI, Farley Mowat wrote up the Inupiat practice of old people just going off into the winter in bad years. With (perhaps) some encouragement, if hale people & infants were starting to starve. In The Snow Walker (book) (1976) I'm pretty sure. And now I see that he did a revised work, after the movie, in 2014. TIn my experience, for a reread?? --Pete Tillman (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geriatric euthanasia 

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata 

message: Can you "frown upon" a certain kind of people? It is usually actions that are frowned upon. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:19F9:1E6:FC23:4220 (talk) 10:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the inhabitants are widely frowned upon"
Talk:HD 217107 b

message: All extrasolar planets are sectioned in it's stars artical.  The only time exoplanets are made into there own artical is if they are of big news and of public intrest (i.e. OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb, 51 Pegasi b, HD 188753 Ab).  These planets are not of any of these standerds, why should they be treeted with royalty.  They should be in the star's artical as of wiki rules and tradition. — HurricaneDevon @ 03:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected 

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: It's obviously too short for a GA.--Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  too short
Talk:HD 217107 c

message: All extrasolar planets are sectioned in it's stars artical.  The only time exoplanets are made into there own artical is if they are of big news and of public intrest (i.e. OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb, 51 Pegasi b, HD 188753 Ab).  These planets are not of any of these standerds, why should they be treeted with royalty.  They should be in the star's artical as of wiki rules and tradition. — HurricaneDevon @ 03:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is better to discuss and find an agreement before acting on such a controversial issue like this, even if you think you're right. By doing this you can avoid pointless edit wars.--Jyril 05:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected 

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass
Talk:More than This (compilation album)

message: More than this is the first song in the 1982 Roxy Music album Avalon. Since the song came before the homonymous compilation, shouldn't there be at least a disambiguation page? Pitix (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A song before an album (and a compilation at that) 

message: The lyrics and sounds seem to have this sentiment of longing.. but does any one have some idea of what the "intendeding" meaning was? or if there was any at all? JamesSug 02:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  an intrepretation of more than this... 
Talk:David N. Weiss

message: Somewhat around 1960-61. I read that somewhere but can't remember. Lincher 17:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:Shrewsbury railway station

message: Why are these out of action or why were they demolished? Simply south 17:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But they were fully used platforms at one point - probably until the early 1970s. I think they were primarily used for trains on the Hartlebury/Severn Valley line. This line now no longer runs from Shrewsbury (only the section between Bridgnorth and Kidderminster is open, as a heritage railway). The platforms do still exist though, but with no track. David 14:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Platforms 1 and 2 - just a query

message: Could somebody please modify the Services infoboxes at the foot of the article to include the Severn Valley Railway in the historical railways section? CrossHouses (talk) 09:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Severn Valley Railway

message: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-62520116.amp Anamyd (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avanti services between Shrewsbury and London withdrawn on 14/8/22