lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inner model

message: The statement
:A model of set theory is assumed to be standard unless it is explicitly stated that it is non-standard. Inner models are usually standard because their ordinals are actual ordinals.
is confusing to me. If the definition did not mean to imply that the membership relations coincided, then the ordinals of N could have nothing to do with the ordinals of M. I think it would be in accordance with standard usage to require inner models to be standard, but at the very least we should require them to be submodels so that "containing all the ordinals" makes sense. Quux0r 00:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Would it be possible to reformulate that article in a way that you don't need a PhD in mathematics to understand it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.134.90.142 (talk) 12:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understandable explanation?? 

message: :"A model of set theory is called standard if the element relation of the model is the actual element relation restricted to the model."
This line, I feel, warrants some explanation.  What, exactly, is the "actual" element relation?
"Actual" seems to be a needlessly loaded term.  I mean, even if we commit to a platonist approach to set theory and stipulate that there is some underlying background model for all mathematics (I believe we really ought to write articles such that this stipulation is not necessary, as it is quite separate from the math itself...), I don't think there's much actual agreement on what that background model really is, so this still makes little sense.
There may well be a way to state this more comprehensibly (from what I can tell, simply re-write it to be in the context of an explicit larger model), but the current wording, I think, is definitely not it. 
96.231.153.5 (talk) 02:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The recent edit to the definition has resolved this, and it is now perfectly clear. 100.19.76.97 (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Actual element relation" 

message: Currently Standard model (set theory), and even Set model redirects here. This seems to make no sense since "inner model" is a much more specific concept than "standard model", and an inner model cannot be a set model since a set cannot contain all the ordinals of the universe. Should we rewrite this page so that it is primarily talking about standard models, and have inner models as a sub-topic? Bbbbbbbbba (talk) 01:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed Standard model (set theory) from a redirection page to a new stub. However, with my currently limited understanding of inner models, it is difficult for me to trim content from this article and add it to the new article. Help is welcome. Bbbbbbbbba (talk) 13:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the title (and primary topic) of this page be "Standard model (set theory)"?
Talk:Aram-Damascus

message: There is a cite for 2 Kings 11:33 ... 2 Kings 11 has only 20 lines. --Mannanan51 (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  incorrect cite 

message: It has already been removed from Edom and the History of Palestine. Elsewhere it's still in use, but just. It has also been criticised elsewhere - and for many years now; we should centralise the issue, and the Edom talk-page would be as good a place as any. An overview of the discussions, with Edom first:
*Talk:Edom#:Territory: historical evolution; map deeply flawed
*
*Talk:Moab#MAP is so bad
*Talk:History of Palestine#Map of the Levant 830 BCEArminden (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is a bad joke, needs to be removed
Talk:Lajat

message: The article fails to mention that these sixty walled cities described by Dr. Porter, were later dated to a much later age than the Bronze or Iron I period, and probably represent buildings from the Greco-Roman period.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.50.181 (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argob 

message: I purpose this page to be merged with Lajat article, since they talk about the same geographical region. It is possible to create a new section in Lajat article talking about the region mentions in the bible (I purpose information about As-safa hills to be merged with its own article in a similar section for the bible), because I don't see a good reason to make a separate article talking only about the region in the bible, in addition to the fact that Trachonitis is known to be a general historical name for Lajat during the Romanian period --aad_Dira (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Trachonitis should clearly be in a history sub-section of Lajat. GenQuest (talk) 03:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:As-Suwayda Governorate

message: the name of this article to "al-Suwayda Governorate" anyone agree? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, "Al-Suwayda Governorate" is better. Yazan (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to change 
Talk:GDF11

message: Note to self. May want to mention this in the article. EIN (talk) 17:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 2nd article - here   — C M B J   22:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDF-11 and heart health 

message: "Young Blood May Hold Key to Reversing Aging"
[]
This line of research warrants a sentence or two.  It's possibly much more than just heart muscle.32cllou (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT article 

message: For such a short article, there are maybe a few too many mentions of "similarity to myostatin":
* It is a myostatin-homologous protein
* pathway similar to that of myostatin
* similarities between GDF11 and myostatin
* GDF11 is closely related to myostatin
* Both myostatin and GDF11 are involved
* the similarities between myostatin and GDF11
It might read better if just one or two were removed. -LesPaul75talk 17:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Similar to myostatin" 

message: The first line of the topic "Human Studies" states that "GDF11 levels fall to zero in humans at a mean age of 73.71."  A relatively current study indicates that GDF-11 in humans does not decline with age, but GDF-8 does. The link to the study is https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10793994/ The title of the study is "GDF11 and aging biology - controversies resolved and pending"  dated 2023 Oct 20.  Take a look at the Graphical Abstract before the INTRODUCTION in this study.  Then, search for "Total circulating GDF11 does not decline with age" in the study.  Also, note that the majority of the authors are at Harvard University.   Another JayOrman (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Studies
Talk:Soon-ho Lee

message: Does anyone else beleive that this article should be added to it? Coho (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki project martial arts

message: This page needs some work, maybe something about his life before he became grandmaster. Nillocnroh 20:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, it needs some work. I've added an external link to a page containing useful biographical information about Grand Master Soon Ho Lee, anyone can pick it up and improve the article with it. Jitieicreiz (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ill read the two external links and summarize it for the wikipedia page, in the mean time I reworded the existing article, what do you think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coho (talk • contribs) 22:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs some work 

message: What word is that supposed to be?--69.118.235.97 17:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a typo, it has been corrected. It should read Eternal Grand Master. Jitieicreiz (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''enternal''' grand master
Talk:WINZ (AM)

message: The file :File:WINZ 940WINZ logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free former logo being used in a :WP:DECORATIVE manner in :WINZ (AM)#Previous logo which fails :WP:NFCC#8. Non-free former logos can be used as long as their use complies with :WP:NFC#cite_note-4 and this almost always means the logo itself about the logo and the associated change in brandling that led to its replacement is the subject of sourced critical commentary. Simply adding the logo to "show" what it looks like is not considered sufficient to satisfy :WP:NFC#CS, except in cases where the logo is being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of an article about the organization the logo represents.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on .
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:WINZ 940WINZ logo.png]]
Talk:WMYM

message: Don't know why Reference 8 is even there.
No where in the article is WMYM mentioned or reference.
Plus, if I read the article correctly, it's WEPN in New York City that's the flagship of ESPN Desportes Radio, not WMYM.
Or am I missing something? 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reference" #8 

message: The article states that the station went off the air on June 11, 2015; but no where is it stated/mentioned when it came back on the air.
I think that's an important piece of information.
Can somebody find out that date and incorporate it into the article? 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 14:05, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back on the air
Talk:Azaz

message: Has nothing (nothing at all) happened in Azaz in the last 900 years?  Skinsmoke (talk) 15:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, good question...this is wikipedia!  Huldra (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: What is the ethymology of this name, it sound similar to As(s)es and Asia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.20.234.222 (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azaz 

message: Does anyone know: is this the place mentioned on p.  405 in le Strange? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I think it is. Though, it's strange that the second paragraph quoting Abu'l Fida, says that the city is south-west of Aleppo (in reality it's north). The first paragraph, however, quoting Yaqut, places it correctly to the north. I think they're both talking about the same place, nevertheless, just a type or factual error (the town is still famous for its pistachio). Yazan (talk) 17:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  le Strange 
Talk:Jasmine Lennard

message: The article (bio box) reports her to weigh 106kg or 230 pounds.  she does not look that heavy at all.  Maybe 106lb or 48kg? --CWagner (May 9, 2009)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwagner (talk • contribs) 23:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reported weight appears wrong 

message: the article should mention her association with the late Casey Johnson. Even without mentioning the vibrator incident.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.66.244 (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  casey johnson 

message: Does appearing in small roles in a few minor reality TV series, and alleging a relationship with a footballer, really add up to enough to pass our notability guidelines? I would hope not. This is the kind of person who might be popular in gossip columns, but doesn't deserve an article on Wikipedia. Robofish (talk) 12:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: Why is there no mention in the article of her affair with Simon Cowell??
http://uk.omg.yahoo.com/gossip/the-juice/simon-cowell-keeping-secrets-celeb-bb-jasmine-lennard-131404662.html?code=AQAyBkH5_9NHRUgLLhbMSAWaGhMWeQK5GZiuDKjGHXYFcxJhS4_4A6DxF0tulE4unJJHxsOQ2-q_r_gD0kSchpn-ZIdnkVrs7rAXFW9CtGJzAtjEtTR7Zf5woyY-iLuuXTfQcgDo2aUDToqM6IPR_IcF2sSxxjQorZWWicQ5nBTU68FhFzPtEGRQkun61raOCZI#_=_  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohdear15 (talk • contribs) 11:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Simon Cowell
Talk:Jasmine Richards

message: IMDb and tv.com are not reliable sources. Both are, essentially, user editable (basically, they're like Wikipedia in terms of reliability). IMDb is ever so slightly better in that changes to their content are moderated (preventing some really obvious mistakes) and some screenwriting credits are authoritative, but, in the end, they fail our policies for biographies of living persons. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: IMDb/tv.com
Talk:Family Planning Association

message: This article's title is incorrect because the organisation's name is "fpa", not "The Family Planning Association".  It doesn't officially stand for anything.  Any objections to a move? The Wednesday Island (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the move is a good idea - mostly because links to the page are more likely to be understandable if under the spelled out name.  fpa is only a useful name if you know what the organization is already.  If you see it in a listing in another article, Family Planning Association tells you something about what the article is about, fpa doesn't.  Given that the organization's website seems to indicate that they still use both names  (e.g. their charity registration seems to be under the name Family Planning Association), think better to leave as is.  (A redirect from fpa would make sense though.)  Zodon (talk) 02:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  fpa 
Talk:Walter Comyn, Lord of Badenoch

message: I am a bit confused here as to who Isabella, Countess of Menteith was married to.  When I'm on the page for Waler Comyn, Earl of Menteith it shows that he is the husband of Isabella.  Yet when I click on Isabella to go to her page it shows that she is married to John Comyn, Lord of Badenoch.  Am I missing something here?
Energizerbunie 00:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Succession to the Throne Act, 1937

message: Opera hat - you obviously feel this article should be contained in the category Succession to the British crown.  However, the Act pertained to Canada only, it did not touch on the British Crown at all.  Unless, of course, you have evidence to the contrary. --G2bambino 17:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought that in the interests of brevity :Category:Succession to the British crown would be a better title than the more accurate but long-winded :Category:Succession to the crowns of the predecessor and successor states of the ci-devant British Empire. However, I've now changed it. Opera hat 10:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. It's important for clarity and accuracy. --G2bambino 17:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession to British Crown 

message: Any links to the actual text of the Act? Astrotrain (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Text of the Act

message: Should the article note (assuming that such is the case) that the Act was passed by the Parliament of Canada alone, without input from the provincial Parliaments? Alekksandr (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Provincial Parliaments
Talk:Jason Derek Brown

message: They say there are not marks or scares but I believe I clearly see a mole of some sort on the side of his face . Why is that not mentioned . Of course there would be scaring if it was removed .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.196.33 (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identifing  marks  

message: Where did Brown get his master's in international business and earlier degree(s)? Dynzmoar (talk) 01:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic degrees 
Talk:Jason Gann

message: : For a second time within a 24-hour period, you have removed material at Jason Gann that was properly cited to a reliable source, namely The Sydney Morning Herald, a large and respected newspaper, and Australia's oldest. If you continue to edit war and to vandalize Wikipedia by removing such properly and reliably sourced content, an admin will be asked to block or ban this IP address. If you have legitimate concerns about the sourcing, discuss them on the article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:25, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: CC of post at User talk:86.182.125.185

message: Such a bizarrely, blatantly biased article... Even the comments on here, a mixture of humorous but also concerning... "Melbourne Incident", not "Assault Charge"? Or "Controversy", as is typically used? I think one of his stalkers may be over-moderating and censoring this page...24.4.156.15 (talk) 03:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: This page is wildly lacking information...

message: My kudos to the new editor who added all this new, well-cited material today. Excellent work. I've independenly removed the tags, since they're now obsolete. One small point: We need a better image in the infobox. This is angled image with part of his face covered, and it's always best, for encyclopedic identification purposes, to have a plain, clear, straight-ahead shot. Otherwise, my very sincere compliments on a job well-done! --Tenebrae (talk) 02:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You got banned xD 24.4.156.15 (talk) 03:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Bravo!
Talk:Jason Lee (field hockey)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.greatbritainhockey.co.uk/page.asp?section=0001000100120002§ionTitle=Who%27s+Who. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 19:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Centre for Statistics in Medicine

message: Hi, I am new Wikipedia user and created the article on Centre for Statistics in Medicine. I see a message from an Editor saying that the subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline for Companies. Fruther the message says that the article will be deleted if the notability cannot be established.
First of all, this is an academic research centre not a company. Secondly, I did cite the information as mostly being from http://www.csm-oxford.org/.
What do I do now ? Please advice.
Adaikalavan Ramasamy 00:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No title
Talk:Jason McLaughlin

message: The University of Alabama does not have a men's soccer team. 138.26.248.22 09:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jason Michael Carroll

message: Ok, when I was here a few weeks ago it stated that Jason was in the middle of a divorce from Wendy. Now it says there still married but he was married previously, Is he married or not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riseabovethis (talk • contribs) 03:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Married or Not?! 

message: It is time to change the main picture of Jason. He has cut his hair, you know. Just to clarify what he looks like now. Keep the current picture up, but put it as his "before" look.
ZeldaFan91 {talk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.162.146 (talk) 00:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture 
Talk:Jason Murphy

message: Jason Murphy is actually a pretty popular name, and recently a few other "Jason Murphy's" worthy of acknowledgment have surfaced.
*Jason Murphy - Director, Photographer 
*Jason Murphy on IMDB
--JustAGal 20:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Results
Talk:Jason Holsman

message: Both 'career' and 'personal life' sections are without references. Family information especially requires sources, as do listings of honors, some of which don't appear notable enough to merit encyclopedic mention. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced sections 
Talk:Doug Parmenter

message: ==Note==
Noticed this name had gone unchecked on the Sterophonics page. Saw this guy on a Glasto (or possibly Carling Weekend) festival interview a few years ago, unsure how to add references?
- Spoke to friends to confirm some facts. Feel free to correct, but assumed right.
He is not Welsh! His family are Welsh, but he has never lived there. He simply met Kelly when visiting family in Aberdare.
==Cleanup message==
Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 14:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 14:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: As no one has actually put any direct comments/complaints about unencyclopedic aspects of the article on here I have removed the tag for now. --Talkshowbob (talk) 02:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: unencyclopedic
Talk:Jason Silva

message: This page is currently tagged for relying too heavily on primary sources. I am in the process of researching articles and intend to update the page with reliable secondary sources. Suggestions for reliable sources welcome. SojoQ (talk) 10:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added secondary sources and some content to the page. I've also removed the tag. More content from reliable sources is welcome.SojoQ (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary Sources Tag
Talk:Jason St Juste

message: He's playing professionally in Norway now, for Sandnes FC I believe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.190.202.30 (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled