Talk:Miley Cyrus/Archive 3

message: I picked up the print version of today's USA Today; and it mentioned that Miley was planning to write her memoirs with a Disney-owned publisher that is expected to be out in 2009. (Will look for link later) WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: User:NrDg has already added the info. I'll try to expand on that if and when i get some time....also there are lot of single stand-alone sentences in the article, esp toward the end of "Career" section....maybe someone can expand those or club them together into a single paragraph....i'll try to do it in a day or two...or if possible then someone else can do it !!!..Gprince007 (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed as soon as I looked at the page history. Thanks.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memoirs 

message: ""
This looks to be pretty major and as NY Times picked it up will meet our notability requirements for inclusion here. It also confirms the other pictures and can be used a reference there is needed. A photo controversy section could probably be created to cover all this along with the other referenced photo stuff. The LATimes also had a business perspective on the previous photos. This issue does have the potential to have a major impact on Cyrus's life and career as noted in the referenced articles. I'm not going to add anything to the article just yet - see what else turns up first - would like more than 1 reference. I won't object if someone want to run with this though. --NrDg 22:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity Fair photos 

message: Can someone prove that's right or not, because I see Native American descent in her father also.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.237.217 (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't say for certain, and certainly couldn't add this in assuming it was or wasn't true for risk of violating original research policy. Also, I'd probably wait for the whole Vanity Fair picture incident to die down first.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is she part Native American? 

message: Cyrus was twelve years old when she originally auditioned for Disney for the lead role of Miley Stewart/Hannah Montana, as well as the show's "best friend" roles,[17] but Disney Channel executives judged her to be too small. Cyrus was persistent in her desire to be part of Hannah Montana, however, so Disney called her back for further auditions when she turned 12.  This is obviously wrong... and I dont know anything about her, sooo... yeah.  Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed "when she turned 12" from the end of the sentence. I looked at the sources to try to find a specific age for when the callbacks happened, but I couldn't find it. Walkerb4 (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward Sentence 

message: I saw a bit of a conflict going on about the word "topless". I have to agree that it is a misleading and sensationalistic description that we should avoid. Think: if a bar advertised "topless dancing", but the girls performed covered in bedsheets, do you think they would stay open long?Kww (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We can see the pictures as referenced at Vanity Fair. and don't need to go with the NYT characterization. The connotation of topless implies something not backed up by the real photos. Normal meaning as most people read the word is nude from the waist up which is not what these pictures show. Suggest a more descriptive phrase that accurately describes the picture without misleading the reader. --NrDg 15:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a sentence which quotes NYtimes as saying that she was not topless but instead was covered in bedsheet. I have added it in the article with proper cite and made necessary changes. Gprince007 (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topless? 

message: There have been rumors on the net of Miley dating Jeremy Shum, Joe Jonas, Michael Musso, etc.. I was wondering whether we should include it, cuz I have noticed people have been reverting these.. saying it's just "rumors"... but it's still like, true and stuff, cuz it's on the net... Smilesfornows (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it ain't. You don't just see something that some asshole on the internet wrote and assume that it's true.  72.95.139.248 (talk) 08:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyfriends and stuff 

message: Now, she has changed her name and it's "Miley Ray Cyrus" but when you hit the "Go" button when you search on "Miley Ray Cyrus" you get redirected to "Miley Cyrus" article, shouldn't it be moved to "Miley Ray Cyrus" and let the "Miley Cyrus" page be the redirect to "Miley Ray Cyrus"? Thanks for reading, leave your comments. --Kanonkas, Take Contact (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure yet. See : there may not be all it's cracked up to be in this name change. It might just be a middle name. The Evil Spartan (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Everything needs to stay the way it is now. Most people have middle names that are mentioned in their article ledes but not in the article title. Articles are named after what the person is most commonly known as, what people are most likely to search on. Redirects are placed on the lesser known alternatives. All her credits are still "Miley Cyrus" and unless and until she starts getting better known by her full name, we need to keep using her stage name. --NrDg 14:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm pretty sure they should change "Destiny Hope Cyrus" at the top of the page since she legally changed her name to Miley (something, possibly Ray) Cyrus. --Red XII ftw (Red XII ftw talk) 12:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kind of annoying that the answer to the above question is directly in the article as written. And no she HAS NOT changed her name yet. --NrDg 13:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect and article 

message: As long as this article has a "Controversy" section, shouldn't there be a mention of the lawsuit against the Miley Cyrus Fan Club over the distribution of concert tickets? (See ABC News for example.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is well covered in the article about the concert. See Best of Both Worlds Tour#Tickets controversy and, since it really has nothing to do with Miley Cyrus, belongs in that article only. --NrDg 16:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to agree with Metro's first comment....I think there should at least be a brief mention of the concert ticket distribution fiasco and lawsuit.  Further detail can be left to the article on the BoBW Tour, but at least the existence of the controversy should be mentioned.  Readers who then want to know more can go to that page for further info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.66.193 (talk) 12:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again this has absolutely nothing to do with Cyrus other than she was the headliner on a popular tour that had ticket allocation problems. The issue is adequately covered in the tour article. The most that could be said in this article is that because of her popularity tickets were quickly sold out and hard to come by - if that is backed up with WP:RS analysis. That is not controversial. --NrDg 15:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy: the ticket lawsuit 

message: Her official myspace is http://www.myspace.com/mileycyrus
192.43.227.18 (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem putting the official one on. Don't know about the unofficial, if it's even genuine - besides which, it appears to be a privacy leak, and has no part on her page per WP:BLP. The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Put fan site on http://www.mileycyrusland.com/ ? 130.220.153.164 (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this would be blatantly inappropriate.  --Yamla (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Assuming it is, it looks like she forgot to update after the name change became official (partly as a result of the Vanity Fair fallout).  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official MySpace 

message: Shouldn't people mention her photo controversy? Never mind-i'll do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.118.141 (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No - see above for reasons. --NrDg 22:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Not really, anyway, you should be following the discussion below regardless. --Charitwo talk 11:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo "Scandal" part 2 

message: The article pretty much says that she's a perfect angel and why is it protected!?  People should be allowed to change it if there's something wrong with it!!!
I personally think that the article could use a lot of work!!!
She's not so important that she needs to have her signature on there!!! I mean what is she the queen or something???!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlynn132 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is only protected against new users registered in last 4 days and anonymous users. Please make any changes you think necessary to improve the article as long as you keep a neutral point of view and add verifiable information derived from reliable sources. See WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:RS. If you have just registered you will have to wait a bit. --NrDg 00:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And the signature issue was discussed last month and removed, and I should know because I was the one that brought the issue of signatures up.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with this guy, to me, it resembles a fan club article more than anything else. Ganon391 (talk) 05:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was just wondering where the section about her teeth was 129.237.215.146 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 19:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I concur with User:NrDg – articles on celebrities are particularly vulnerable to vandalism.  I also concur with the Start-class assessment as of this post, as cross-check sources are currently lacking; otherwise this article closely approaches Standard.  B. C. Schmerker (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad article 

message: According to CMT, Miley had already changed her name in February. Tcatron565 (talk) 22:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: see #Miley Ray Cyrus vs. Destiny Hope Cyrus --NrDg 23:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miley Ray Cyrus 

message: Should there be a Template:Hannah Montana to separate Miley's carrer and singles from Hannah's?68DANNY2 (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, since Miley Cyrus is a person, and Hannah Montana is her show and her character, but if you think it's neccessary, you can try to help out and make one! Be bold! ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Hannah Montana? 

message: Her on-air conversation with Idaho DJ "KeKe Luv" has recently created quite a stir. After hearing about Luv's attempt to stay awake for seven days, Cyrus suggested purchasing illegal eyedrops from Japan that allow the user to stay awake for two days. This sound clip is archived by the local KISS.FM station, and is played quite frequenly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.62.219 (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked the normal news outlets and even the gossip sites and not one of them has mentioned this. Without some WP:RS reliable source that we can WP:V verify that talks to this, it does not belong in the article. --NrDg 03:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Illegal eyedrops? Allowing one to stay awake for two days? Are you sure this isn't a joke?  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly why we have the notability, reliable source and verifiability requirements. --NrDg 18:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if backed by sources, this news seems too trivial and tabloid type....it is definitely not notable according to me....Gprince007 (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I never heard of something like that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.139.17 (talk) 23:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Boise's KISS.FM has the sound clip. Contact them through their website and I'm sure they'd be happy to share it. It hasn't been in tabloids because, frankly, what happens in Idaho stays in Idaho, where nobody cares. But this is completely real; the DJ staying awake was a state-wide frenzy, where he even got awarded by local politicians. And he made sure to use that exact sound byte all the time during this stunt. 72.24.33.99 (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another piece of Controversy 

message: Do we really need info about video of her and Jiroux dancing against Jon Chu and Adam Sevani of Step Up 2??? Infact it sounds like fan-posting and doesnt seem so notable??? I mean who is Jiroux ,Jon chu and Adams Sevani ???? Gprince007 (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too. And Jiroux is Mandy Jiroux, Miley's friend/dancer and she's in the Miley and Mandy Show. ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 00:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need this?? 

message: As you can see, here. Please state your meaning here about a possible merge. I mean this should be deleted, if it isn't very much notable that it needs it own article. I would also say it would need more WP:V and references. Here is one but again the WP:N --Kanonkas :  Take Contact   15:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging sounds fine to me....Even i had my doubts about the notability of the show having its own article....anyways while merging the article, we shd take care not to give undue weightage to the show...Afterall the show has only Miley as a celebrity. Other characters from the show are virtually unknown.... Gprince007 (talk) 15:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agre, merging sounds about right, I don't think the show should have it's own article, but I don't think it should be ignored completely.slydogman920 (talk) Slydogman920 (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that this article should be merged into Miley Cyrus. The title for the article is misunderstood, as the creator of it created it as "Miley & Mandy". I believe now this has been changed to "The Miley & Mandy Show", which is what the article discusses. The article has been edited and given more information and more sources/references. This article has no need to be merged as this discusses the youtube show in which Miley Cyrus and Mandy Jiroux created and star in. The information on this page does not need to be listed under Miley Cyrus, as this is not details on her life. The notability on this will grow sooner as the page becomes a stronger article and more information about the subject has been released. Right now, there is no more information which can be added as all information on the subject has been added. The show has become ever popular and many people will be looking it up in search engines, and will come up with this page.--Tiah12345 (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i think the article should stay as is. its link from miely is only because mandy jiroux is virtually unkowned to the world. this show is become a online phnenomnena and deserves its place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.154.127.28 (talk) 16:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be more specific --Kanonkas :  Take Contact   10:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we need to not separate the articles. Especially not with Miley Cyrus. This article is about a show with Miley and Mandy on YouTube. It gives information that, if spruced up and edited correctly, could be useful. It just looks really bad now because there haven't been very good edits on the article. Tcatron565 (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Miley & Mandy 

message: Near the beginning it says the movie will be released in late 2008 or earley 2009. The date has been confirmed of May 1 2009, I would change it but this article is "Semi-protected".--kcin 00:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide your reliable citation.  --Yamla (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.variety.com/article/vr1117981211.html?categoryid=13&cs=1 sorry for not posting that origenley.--kcin 01:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie 

message: If you go to www.cdvuplus.com, when it says "Coming Soon in 2008" it has her name listed. Do we need to add this information under discography as TBA? MusicBoi94 (talk) 03:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see something that specifies an actual release date. I don't know how reliable that site is. --NrDg 04:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

text: It doesn't look fan-made, and Hollywood Records' official MySpace gives you the link to it MusicBoi94 (talk) 08:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I probably would save that link and wait for more info before adding that to the article and/or related articles.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 19:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Thank you, but those are all remakes of the songs by other artists. Don't Walk Away was originally by Nick Carter, Full Circle and Four Walls were originally by Cheyenne Kimball. Maybe those are just demos or maybe Miley recorded it for fun? I have no idea. ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

text: On YouTube, there are 2 clips of new songs believed to be on the new album: 'Fly on the Wall' and 'Breakout'. MusicBoi94 (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Album 

message: I picked up the print version of today's USA Today; and it mentioned that Miley was planning to write her memoirs with a Disney-owned publisher that is expected to be out in 2009. (Will look for link later) WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: User:NrDg has already added the info. I'll try to expand on that if and when i get some time....also there are lot of single stand-alone sentences in the article, esp toward the end of "Career" section....maybe someone can expand those or club them together into a single paragraph....i'll try to do it in a day or two...or if possible then someone else can do it !!!..Gprince007 (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed as soon as I looked at the page history. Thanks.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memoirs 

message: ""
This looks to be pretty major and as NY Times picked it up will meet our notability requirements for inclusion here. It also confirms the other pictures and can be used a reference there is needed. A photo controversy section could probably be created to cover all this along with the other referenced photo stuff. The LATimes also had a business perspective on the previous photos. This issue does have the potential to have a major impact on Cyrus's life and career as noted in the referenced articles. I'm not going to add anything to the article just yet - see what else turns up first - would like more than 1 reference. I won't object if someone want to run with this though. --NrDg 22:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity Fair photos 

message: Can someone prove that's right or not, because I see Native American descent in her father also.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.237.217 (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't say for certain, and certainly couldn't add this in assuming it was or wasn't true for risk of violating original research policy. Also, I'd probably wait for the whole Vanity Fair picture incident to die down first.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is she part Native American? 

message: Cyrus was twelve years old when she originally auditioned for Disney for the lead role of Miley Stewart/Hannah Montana, as well as the show's "best friend" roles,[17] but Disney Channel executives judged her to be too small. Cyrus was persistent in her desire to be part of Hannah Montana, however, so Disney called her back for further auditions when she turned 12.  This is obviously wrong... and I dont know anything about her, sooo... yeah.  Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed "when she turned 12" from the end of the sentence. I looked at the sources to try to find a specific age for when the callbacks happened, but I couldn't find it. Walkerb4 (talk) 14:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward Sentence 

message: I saw a bit of a conflict going on about the word "topless". I have to agree that it is a misleading and sensationalistic description that we should avoid. Think: if a bar advertised "topless dancing", but the girls performed covered in bedsheets, do you think they would stay open long?Kww (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We can see the pictures as referenced at Vanity Fair. and don't need to go with the NYT characterization. The connotation of topless implies something not backed up by the real photos. Normal meaning as most people read the word is nude from the waist up which is not what these pictures show. Suggest a more descriptive phrase that accurately describes the picture without misleading the reader. --NrDg 15:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a sentence which quotes NYtimes as saying that she was not topless but instead was covered in bedsheet. I have added it in the article with proper cite and made necessary changes. Gprince007 (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topless? 

message: Should we include the playboy offer in controversies??? ...i mean it hasnt taken shape of a "controversy" yet.....It's just simple offer made thru an interview ....the offer has not been officially made to miley yet. I read abt this a few days ago but decided not to add it becos it's just a simple remark made by hefner and no formal offer has been made. Even if we add it, i dont think it merits an individual sub-section in "Controversies" becos it is not a controversy. I suggest two alternatives: first is we delete it...the second alternative being, we include it in "Vanity fair" section by writing "Following the publication of pictures in Vanity fair, Hugh Hefner made an offer...."....I want to know what others think of it??? Gprince007 (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not particularly notable. Hefner makes these offers to pretty much any reasonably attractive female celebrity. There were seventeen-year-old Playmates in the early years, so Miley isn't too far off of his age range.Kww (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is part of the Vanity Fair issue - another well known person coming to Cyrus's defense. Hefner just made a passing remark and was being polite, in his own way, to Cyrus. I say remove it as notable only to gossip mags, not mainstream press like the rest of the stuff we have included. We could add stuff to the Vanity Fair section that talks to the reactions to the controversy and how it has effected or is expected to effect Cyrus. --NrDg 13:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Did I miss something over the weekend? Because, I don't remember hearing a thing about this at all.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 18:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playboy offer 

message: Her newest single off her coming album, "Breakout" is called "7 Things".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duhhitzxtina (talk • contribs) 22:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Single 

message: Miley's Hannah song, "Rock Star" is very similar to "Scotty Doesn’t Know" by Lustra from the movie Eurotrip. Should we mention that? I heard it everywhere that the band, Lustra, are thinking about what to do about it (lawsuit? demanding credit?) ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 01:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Stripping out the publicity angle of Cyrus falsely being accused of plagiarism. This is a song she didn't write and her only involvement is as a for hire singer/actress performer. This topic properly belongs in the song article as it objectively has nothing to do with Cyrus. --NrDg 01:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Problem in "Rock Star" 

message: Miley earned 18.2 million last year, according to Parade magazine's annual "What People Earn" issue. This amount seems much more accurate than the measely 3 million mentioned currently. I suggest this higher figure be used as it seems more correct based on all the facts we have today. Forbes reported in June 2008 that Miley earns $25 million per year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LancerDog (talk • contribs) 04:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When you are looking at these things, you need to keep track of what's being reported. If Cyrus's tour grossed $50mil/week, she wouldn't personally get a huge percentage of that.Kww (talk) 02:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Salary?? 

message: With all of Miley's new business ventures, financial analysts predict she is on track to be a billionaire by age 18. http://www.hollyscoop.com/hannah-montana/hannah-montana-to-be-a-billionaire-by-age-of-18_14622.aspx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LancerDog (talk • contribs) 05:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miley on track to be a billionaire by age 18 

message: I'm still a little uncertain as to why Miley's article has a signature. Is there some policy that covers this?  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My real concern is with authenticity. It is in commons and it is a content decision whether or not to include it in this article. --NrDg 20:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I searched Google images to try to find examples of her handwriting. While the file we have may not be a typical example of her signature, certain characteristics, particularly the way the tail of the "y" is drawn out, make it fairly certain (at least to my mind) that it is genuine. J.delanoygabsadds 04:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signature Again 

message: i am a bit confused, on the meet miley cyrus cd it say Mley co-wrote it, right? well on the Best of Both Worlds Concert cd it says only Matthew Wilder Tamara Dunn wrote it should it be mentined some where?
Meliss402 (talk) 21:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[G.N.O.]] 

message: Why did Wikipedia put Miley's signature on the page. You know, anyone could copy it, put it on a piece of paper, sell it, and get rich! Could someone change that?
--Mileyhannahroxsox (talk) 23:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is extremely unlikely. If someone copied the image, and tried to pass it off as the original, it would be painfully obvious if they tried to print it on something. A laser printer looks very different than a pen. Also, Wikipedia is not the only place that has pictures of Cyrus' signature. If was able to make a printer print something that looks enough like a pen to fool someone into thinking that it is a genuine copy of Cyrus' signature, that person would easily know enough to be able to scrape Cyrus' signature from some other image of her autograph. J.delanoygabsadds 04:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a signature for most people articles on Wikipedia. There is a whole infobox syntax devoted to it. If you have a problem, take it to higher-level discussion pages. I have no examples since there is no precedent for something like this. --haha169 (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miley's Signature. 

message: Not quite sure which Jonas was involved but should it be mentioned that she had a relationship with (Nick, i think) one of them?! I myself am not totally upto date on the tween scene but I've heard that she has written a song "7 Things" to tell this boy her feelings so seeing as she has written a song which has become a single should there be a mention to the relationship that sparked Cyrus to write this YouTube hit Nisior (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless we have a reliable source, we need not include it. This issue has been discussed b4 also i guess. Gprince007 (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jonas Love 

message: It should be added that Miley will be the host for the 2008 Teen Choice Awards, which airs on Fox on August 4. It is reported on the wikipedia page for Teen Choice awards (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teen_Choice_Awards) and www.teenchoiceawards.com that this is true.   I don't know why it hasn't been updated on this page already, but it is definitely significant for her.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liam8 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teen Choice Awards 

message: She wasnt an overnight sensation, that would mean everyone loved her the first day. It sounds like an idoit fan wrote it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckCoke (talk • contribs) 23:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overnight Sensation 

message: i know she's white but like what European ancestry is she like Greek, or Irish???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Francedesyy (talk • contribs) 19:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What ethnicity is she??? 

message: Tyra Banks has pitched the idea that Miley should have her own talk show. Like a teenage version show of Tyra's. Tyra said she is very talented. I guess after Miley made over 50 million dollars this year somone finally realized she had talent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.229.198.173 (talk) 03:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Show 

message: On the official court documents from Cyrus's name change, it lists her place of birth as Nashville, Tennessee (PDF (page 4)). The only source for the article's current claim of Franklin, Tennessee, is an article from The San Diego Union-Tribune from Knight Ridder News Service. I would tend to believe an official court document over a lesser-known news service. --Zimbabweed (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, i support the claim of legal document over-riding a news service. I think we should change the info in the article accordingly and use (PDF (page 4) as the cite for it. Gprince007 (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One word of caution. We need to understand what we mean by "birthplace". Given the size of Franklin and its proximity to Nashville, what probably happened is that her family was living in Franklin but used a hospital in Nashville for the birth. In a situation like that, what are we going to call her "birthplace"?Kww (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever be the case....i feel that if Miley decides to give Nashville as her place of birth in a legal document (i am assuming that the legal document on the website is genuine), then we shd write Nashville as her birthplace in the article. Your inference may correct Kww, but if Miley herself states her birthplace as Nashville, then why shouldnt we believe it ??? Gprince007 (talk) 15:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Kww: That's why it's called birthplace and not place of residence at time of birth. Your residence has nothing to do with your place of birth, unless the two are the same. --Zimbabweed (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem with either way with me. I'm making the assumption that the Franklin birthplace is what she stated when asked in an interview.Kww (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 

message: There have been rumors on the net of Miley dating Jeremy Shum,Joe Jonas, Mitchel Musso, etc... But her first ever boyfriend was Jason Staltari, an Australian boy who lived next door to Miley in LA. I was wondering whether we should include it, cuz I have noticed people have been reverting these.. saying it's just "rumors"... but it's still like, true and stuff, cuz it's on the net... Smilesfornows (talk) 07:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it ain't. You don't just see something that some asshole on the internet wrote and assume that it's true.  72.95.139.248 (talk) 08:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

text: This should be includedJumper-themovie (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you even listening to a word I'm saying?  Miley said that she wasn't dating Nick Jonas, or any of these guys, and since there is no proof that she is lying, it shouldn't be included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.139.248 (talk) 14:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boyfriends and stuff 

message: Should there be a Template:Hannah Montana to separate Miley's carrer and singles from Hannah's?68DANNY2 (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really, since Miley Cyrus is a person, and Hannah Montana is her show and her character, but if you think it's neccessary, you can try to help out and make one! Be bold! ♥, calliegal_x (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Hannah Montana? 

message: On The page it says Walt Disney Records (2006-2008) but she is still signed to them and I cant edit it! what do I do?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timsadisneyfreak (talk • contribs) 15:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walt Disney Records 

message: Her on-air conversation with Idaho DJ "KeKe Luv" has recently created quite a stir. After hearing about Luv's attempt to stay awake for seven days, Cyrus suggested purchasing illegal eyedrops from Japan that allow the user to stay awake for two days. This sound clip is archived by the local KISS.FM station, and is played quite frequenly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.62.219 (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked the normal news outlets and even the gossip sites and not one of them has mentioned this. Without some WP:RS reliable source that we can WP:V verify that talks to this, it does not belong in the article. --NrDg 03:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Illegal eyedrops? Allowing one to stay awake for two days? Are you sure this isn't a joke?  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly why we have the notability, reliable source and verifiability requirements. --NrDg 18:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if backed by sources, this news seems too trivial and tabloid type....it is definitely not notable according to me....Gprince007 (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I never heard of something like that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.139.17 (talk) 23:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Boise's KISS.FM has the sound clip. Contact them through their website and I'm sure they'd be happy to share it. It hasn't been in tabloids because, frankly, what happens in Idaho stays in Idaho, where nobody cares. But this is completely real; the DJ staying awake was a state-wide frenzy, where he even got awarded by local politicians. And he made sure to use that exact sound byte all the time during this stunt. 72.24.33.99 (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That never happened.  I looked all over the internet for proof of the "eye drops" scandal, and I found a bunch of random crap that had nothing to do with it.  67.60.62.219 is obviously just another douchebag who thought he/she could post some stupid lie about Miley Cyrus on the internet and get people to believe it.  I mean, come on dude.  Illegal eye drops?  And something like that would definitely make the tabloids.  It's amazing that anyone would be stupid enough to believe this crap.  72.95.139.17  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.139.248 (talk) 01:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: People, this really happened. All somebody has to do is contact that radio station and they'll provide a soundbyte. Why didn't it hit tabloids? Because it's goddamn IDAHO. 
LIES!!!!!!!!!!!! PURE PURE LIES!!!!!!!!!! ANYONE AGREE THAT THIS IS LIES??????????????????????????????????????????(Mini no ipod (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another piece of Controversy