Template talk:Infobox IPA

message: :There's an error in the display but I'm not sure how to fix it.  Anyone else notice it? — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 20:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Error

message: Is there a reason we don't use the built-in play button that works on any browser, and doesn't load a new page? I've set it up in the sandbox, and tested it in the testcases. It works, even if it is a bit ugly on Firefox 3.5+— trlkly 10:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I'll be bold and change it. You can always change it back, and then we can try to form concensus. I just want to be able to direct people to the pages so they can hear what they sound like. If they have to setup a program, they won't do it. — trlkly 01:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is now. Still a bit of a construction. -DePiep (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Built in play button 

message: I have started a /sandbox to turn this box into a standard infobox. -DePiep (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change into standard infobox 

message: * The template uses the basic metatemplate . This results in a standard infobox layout and style. Also, it has the rule: when a parameter is not entered, the whole line should not show (like omitting the Kirshenbaum input).
* Currently two templates are used:  and . The first is simple and handles single character IPA symbols. The latter is needed when there are multiple characters involved. The new template combines both templates (we only need one template to cover all). Also, Tone letters has a handcrafted table to produce the effect; the new one covers that situation too.
* More input options: two notes (each with or without label) are possible. The image can have a caption. 
* Image showing is optional: when there is a symbol by font (show big to pass enough detail, such as diacritics), the optional image file is hidden to prevent double showing. The Image has the  button.
* Inner workings are improved  (better code). Internally used templates are structured. The template also uses the recently created  (no more the , which was difficult in maintenance). As a consequence, there are some five internal subtemplates. -DePiep (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Major changes

message: * After testing, sandboxing, and first documentation the new code should replace the old code in template . This way the name can be retained, and usage (currently 114 pages) does not need editing.
* Deprecated, older parameters are still usable. This too means that changing the code does not need editing the articles.
* Once the new code is entered, the old  is not called any more from the template. Still, its ~35 direct uses (for multiple-character symbols) will need article page editing into the new version. 
* Never broken: never during this development process, not one usage shall be broken. Each step guarantees proper showing of any template in article space.
* After usage of the base-template is zero (after the replacement edits), two templates are unused an will be proposed for deletion by TfD:  and . -DePiep (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction plan

message: -DePiep (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Set font-weight into normal (not bold) by double request at Talk:IPA. -DePiep (talk) 12:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  new {{tlx|Infobox IPA}}  

message: Template:Infobox IPA base has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. General notice. -DePiep (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Infobox IPA base]] 

message: e.g. Retroflex ejective affricate: has two IPA symbols:  ʈ͡ʂʼ tʂʼ
We need a second input like "ipa symbol2 = " ... so that the first symbol can work it s effects, and also no bigfont comma is needed. - Will do when the protection is lower. -DePiep (talk) 01:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo: option two symbols 

message: I think it would be best to add a copyable Wiki-Code Line.
What do you think about this?Iamiyouareyou (talk) 14:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What code would be in that line? Copying the HTML entity code already works: copied from Near-close central rounded vowel ʊ​̈ → ʊ​̈ -DePiep (talk) 14:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did change the HTML entities into , which only has effect for the eye. -DePiep (talk) 15:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Add Wiki-code line

message: The sound recorded in the audio sample is wrong. For me, as Spaniard, it sounds more like a kind of "darkish" /u/, instead of the clear Spanish /o/ of "gato" or "moto" (which corresponds to a short English "more". I suggest changing the sound file for a better one.
I think the sound-sample should be changed. The previous one was way more accurate than this: just listen to the Swedish "öl", it sounds very much like the previous file rather than this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.255.182.164 (talk) 14:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong sound

message: This template's equvilent in Hebrew is he:תבנית:תיבת עיצור. i would add it myself to the English template but i don't know how.--EsB (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Please check. -DePiep (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! --EsB (talk) 19:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  template equvilent in Hebrew 

message: Frietjes and Victor Yus are removing the vt-e box from this template. .
Since they did not point to any general line, I see no reason to do so. The es. "why do we even need an edit link here" (Frietjes) and "I checked some very commonly used infoboxes and I think you're mistaken; none of them have this" (VJ) are, at best, poor arguments. Templates in mainspace very often have this box. -DePiep (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Also at Template talk:Infobox IPA/core2.  I'd say. -DePiep (talk) 21:28, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  V-T-E box 

message: I've always felt this template is quite useless because where you find it is in articles on phonetic sounds, so it would rather be of more help if the infobox was about the sound instead of the symbol(s), i.e. place/manner of articulation, distinctive features, etc. Nardog (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this be about the sound, not the symbol? 

message: On Voiceless retroflex nasal, the lower character juts out of the yellow box, likely due to the diacritic. Opencooper (talk) 12:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diacritic spills out of bounding box 

message: The audio file for [e] at the minute is a diphthong [eɪ̯] (I have also checked it with Praat to confirm the diphthongization). I suggest replacing it with this audio. Stockhausenfan (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The recording you linked is too short and ambiguous and sounds closer to an /ɪ/ (or /e̞/) in my opinion. Emdosis (talk) 18:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing audio file for e