lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act

message: How is it that the only source in this article is a bogus anti-tort reform study, when all reputable economists acknowledge the positive effect MICRA had on insurance rates? THF (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: This article is basically just a stub and does not even include all of the major provisions of MICRA. Basically there are only four or five anyway.I assume that you are referring to the "effect of the statute" with your NPOV complaint. The effect of the statue both here and as a model for other states is virtually undisputed. Physicians claimed a malpractice insurance crisis before the statute. That claim has gone away.the fact that the $250,000 noneconomic damages cap (pain-and-suffering) has not been raised in more than 35 years speaks volumes. Even states that have followed the California model with their own versions of MICRA have raised this number without much political controversy. If you want to complain about something, complained that this important contribution to the health care debate is a virtual stub in Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Da5id403 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? This stub is not comprehensive enough to have a NPOV problem. 

message: Removing the Expert required, and OR tags from 2/2010 after reviewing this and adding additional references, and finding no discussion on talk page. If anyone disagrees, I invite you to be WP:BOLD and revert or discuss.Boogerpatrol (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing two tags from early 2010 
Talk:Mel's Drive-In

message: One of the Mel's was designed by the architectural firm of Armet & Davis, known for 50s era Googie architecture. They also designed Pann's and the first Norms Restaurant. Might be worth working in somehow... According to the website I found it was opened in Sherman Oaks in 1947. Was that the original one??? The dates are interesting... ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The breakaway chain in the Central Valley is named "Original Mel's", for the record.  Evil666 (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's called "Original Mel's, not "Mel's Original" 

message: There are actually two Mel's chains currently in operation, and the reasons are a bit complicated. I've done as much work on this page as I am going to, so maybe someone else can add a History section and explain what happened.
Relevent webpages:
Original Mel's website (scroll for history)
"Mel's Story" at the Mel's Drive-In site
Danwroy (talk) 03:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: History Needed
Talk:Melrose Hill, Los Angeles

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Miracle Mile, Los Angeles, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: "one source", "original research" and "ref improve" tags  were added with no notes on the Talk Page.  As I see no "original research" and there is more than one source, i am removing the tags.Phatblackmama (talk) 04:35, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Tags
Talk:Mendocino, California

message: Is this series of Intel CPUs named after this city?
Siealex (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel Mendocino 
Talk:Menifee, California

message: 'Vibrant'?  looks like a real estate agent wrote this one  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.251.120 (talk) 08:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Talk:List of Metro Express (Los Angeles County) bus routes

message: Hey,
Metro is opening a new express line 501 on the Ventura Freeway from the Del Mar Station to the North Hollywood Station. Here's the link detailing the information: https://www.metro.net/riding/line501/ Since I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, I'm not up to speed on how to do anything. I think that it should look like all of the other tables listing routes, since it is based off of the non-premium route with the same express fare structure. All I really need is the table, and then I can do the citations and the input of the text. This opens on March 1, so I will try to figure out how to do it until then. 
Thanks for the help!
--TJH2018 (talk) 03:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metro Line 501
Talk:Metro Silicon Valley

message: __TOC__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 04:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
*Support, Though I also have not yet seen a print copy, it does indeed seem from the main site that the more correct title would be Metro Silicon Valley.  Smeelgova 09:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: *Support, Though I also have not yet seen a print copy, it does indeed seem from the main site that the more correct title would be Metro Silicon Valley.  Smeelgova 09:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: It's not that there aren't sources, it's that it's undue weight. All the sources show is that some people are making allegations. The two sources in the section I have now twice removed are the petition itself and the newspaper's disclaimer; the latter is pretty standard and the former does not indicate that independent coverage has raised this to a notable level. Particularly given the accusation of children being involved, independent coverage showing that this is a major concern is required. Otherwise it falls under "Anyone can say anything and sometimes does". The first statement is from a 3rd party and does not make the claim about children, so I judge that to be valid to include. Anyone wanting to include more needs to find similar 3rd-party coverage reporting on the child endangerment allegation and/or the petition. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I examined the one 3rd-party source and sourced what I could to that, then shortened the statements about Metro; this still needs further 3rd-party coverage to justify spending more space on it, and in particular saying that Metro has ascribed the petition to its investigative journalism needs a source to be there. But more of what the other editor wants in is now in (and the source is no longer a bare URL). Yngvadottir (talk) 15:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations added in repeated edits 
Talk:Bécancour, Quebec

message: Does anyone have any idea whether the word "sector" is an appropriate English translation of the term "secteur" (which is used in the francophone reference material, e.g. "secteur Bécancour" vs. "Ville de Bécancour")?  Would the word "borough" be a better translation? --dragfyre 18:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sector isn't the right word (it primarily connotes military occupation in English), but I couldn't say with any certainty whether they'd be better described as "boroughs" or "neighbourhoods". Is the use of secteur in French meant to be synonymous with arrondissement, or just "different areas of the town"? Bearcat 21:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The latter, I think... arrondissements are specific to only certain cities and probably carries a more urban connotation than would be applicable in Bécancour. --dragfyre 15:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: District would probably work. Eron 02:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

text: One possible alternative, which I didn't think of until now, is simply to use the untranslated term secteur, similar to the way the term arrondissement is used in the articles on France and on other francophone cities such as Montreal and Quebec City (etc.) That would effectively eliminate the problem.  Thoughts? --dragfyre 15:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked my government online translation guide. Among many definitions for the French secteur, it lists "division d'une entité territoriale créée à des fins administratives particulières," noting that this is from the field of municipal administration - which I think is the type of secteur we are discussing. Unfortunately, unlike every other definition of the term, this one has no English translation. Given that, I'd agree with using the untranslated term. Eron 16:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: lol. --dragfyre 16:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm surprised that it took this long for this to occur to me, but why not use "communities"? It's the term we use on many other equivalent articles. Any objections/discussion? Bearcat 23:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree that the district translation is probably as close as you can get. However Bécancour is the result of the fusion of many municipalities and its population isn't homogeneously (sp?) spread on its territory. Each secteur loosely correspond to a former municipality (many people still say village). Lotheric 07:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer "district" but the official government translation is "sector", according to the Office de la langue francaise "Grande dictionnaire" --Slp1 04:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sectors vs. boroughs 

message: Bécancour, Quebec#Description. On August 6, 1965 Laval, Quebec was first. Peter Horn User talk 16:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine; I've reinstated the sentence you removed and changed it to reflect this (one of the first instead of the first). --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 16:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First merged city
Talk:Michael Daly Hawkins

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Michael Daly Hawkins was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:The Magic Sword (1962 film)

message: This article is incomplete, mostly consisting of a plot summary, and is missing important information. The production section is too short and should be expanded in more detail. The article is also missing important information on the film's theatrical/home media releases, and its reception which needs to be added to the article. For the reception section, there should be two(2) sub-sections such as the film's box-office and critical reception. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Information and Expansion
Talk:Mid City, Los Angeles

message: Please do not delete any additions unless they meet the following critera. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_removal#Irrelevant_information
    2.1 Reasons
        2.1.1 Unsourced information
        2.1.2 Inaccurate information
        2.1.3 Information moved to another article
        2.1.4 Irrelevant information
        2.1.5 Inappropriate content for Wikipedia
        2.1.6 Author's own addition  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phatblackmama (talk • contribs) 23:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content Removal 

message: Hello. This private business is not WP:Notable enough to have its own article, so it should not be listed here. The guideline is Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies), which states "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." The source cited mention this club only in passing, so I am removing it. Thank you. 
BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. That L.A. magazine source can stand by itself. The others mention the club only in passing. It would be nice if you could do an article about the club, and you could probably use the other two links in it as examples of the acts being presented there. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comedy Union 

message: User:Phatblackmama removed quite a bit of information from the WP:Lead, which I restored inasmuch as it seemed to sum up a goodly part of the article. Let's WP:Discuss it here to see what we should do. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, again. I would like to see more than just a bare-bones description in the lead. I am sure that PBM or another editor can compose something that will nicely sum up this article. Yours, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing info from lead
Talk:Midway City, California

message: I suspect Michelle Pfeiffer is a notable FORMER resident.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.186.32 (talk) 23:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable residents 

message: What school district do the children of Midway City attend?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.104.164.140 (talk) 01:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midway City schools 

message: Article states there are 2 trailer parks in Midway City. But Switchboard.com shows none.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.187.215 (talk) 06:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trailer parks? 

message: The new American FactFinder is out from the Census Bureau after the 2010 Census. It does not list Midway City. Odd because there's a post office here marked "Midway City, California".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.109.15 (talk) 00:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  City not listed in 2010 Census 

message: The article states the California Highway Patrol is responsible for traffic enforcement.
The Orange County Sheriff's Department is under the impression the Sheriff is fulfilling that duty.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.243.1.164 (talk) 06:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic enforcement
Talk:Mike Hernandez

message: I'm not really sure why there is an accent on his name, inasmuch as it is not normally used in the references I have seen about him. If there is no objection, I will change the title of this page to plain old Mike Hernandez. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A more detailed analysis of sources would be nice. What are major reference works about him? Do they use diacritics? Did he use them himself? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent
Talk:Lymphoma in animals

message: how can I get only the original topic that I type into the search? checking cat's skin disease and when I tap on the blue highlighted conditions it automatically sends me too the human condition not the cat conditions in the article  not sure how to narrow this down correctly 2601:248:5281:C7A0:39D5:B8F0:1440:A097 (talk) 04:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cat's
Talk:Mammary tumor

message: A question to the adenocarcinoma in mice. To my knowledge the tumor caused by MMTV are not andenocarcinoma but benign tumors. If MMTV could cause a carcinoma, it would not be difficult to construct a modell system for human breast cancer. which ist not yet there. The MMTV tumors make no metastases, neither to the lungs nor to the bones which would be necessary for modell for human breast cancer.Elisabeth Rieping 16:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A
Talk:Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden

message: I just created the "History" section for this article, and I just wanted to make it known that I work at UCLA, at the Charles E. Young Research Library. Nafpaktitism (talk) 04:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI Disclaimer 
Talk:Mile Rocks Lighthouse

message: This clearly was a lighthouse. But now a number of sources refer to it as Mile Rocks Light. For example:
* https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/mile-rocks-lighthouse
* https://www.history.uscg.mil/Browse-by-Topic/Assets/Land/All/Article/1962501/mile-rocks-lighthouse/
* http://wlol.arlhs.com/lighthouse/USA496.html
Is it still correctly called a lighthouse? Or given that the lighthouse proper was demolished 50 years ago, is it just a light these days? -- William Pietri (talk) 23:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this still a lighthouse? Or is it just a light? 

message: The article says it's about a mile southwest of the GG bridge, which is incorrect. It's roughly 2.5 miles from the center of the bridge, and more than two miles from the south end, the closest point. 
https://www.lighthousefriends.com/light.asp?ID=77#:~:text=Located%20roughly%20a%20half%2Dmile,leading%20into%20San%20Francisco%20Bay.
"...it seems Mile Rocks are so named because the rocks are one mile south of the main shipping channel.." Victorbast (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Mile Rocks? A mile from where?
Talk:Millennium Biltmore Hotel

message: I don`t know how the assessment works, but I would definitely disagree with what is posted here describing the Millenium Biltmore. This article does not appear to be a "stub", and in the general sense of the word I would not assess this article as being of "low importance", as this is an important building in numerous ways. Jack B108 (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Season 1, Ep4 of The Old Man (Fx and Hulu) was filmed in the bar and upstairs lobby 67.83.204.220 (talk) 03:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tv shows filmed in Biltmore Hotel
Talk:Millerton Lake

message: I have submitted an initial entry for the article, mentioning the former town of Millerton, California. The remains of this post gold rush-era town lie at the bottom of the current Millerton Lake, hence the lake's name. I'm holding off doing any further entries until I can get with the Fresno County Historical Society, for additional source material and possibly even a public domain photo of old Millerton... Edit Centric 19:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of Millerton, California
Talk:Millikan High School

message: I've worked a bit on cleaning up this article. It had been overrun by vandals, and a lot of the content appeared to have been taken from somewhere else and plunked here, even though some of it was irrelevant. I've cleaned things up a bit, but would encourage others familiar with the school to go through it and take it further. Fogster (talk) 03:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: User:72.87.134.2 attempted to remove "Gay-Straight Alliance" and changed "Pathway to Excellence and Integrity" to "Home of the Pride Rebellion". I checked the official website, and both his edits were wrong.--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:72.87.134.2]]'s edits 

message: I've cut what I can from the article, but am not familiar enough with the information covered in the Academies section to work on that. It looks promotional to me and in need of cutting.--Tacyarg (talk) 18:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Academies section
Talk:Million Dollar Theater

message: First, there was no need to disambiguate the link "Metropolitan Water Board" as no such agency ever existed in Los Angeles. It is the Metropolitan Water District which had its offices in the Million Dollar Theatre's office building. 
Secondly, I don't know where it began (though I suspect this page, the fourth paragraph of which contains the earliest example I can find), but I'm seeing much conflation of two agencies; The Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. William Mulholland was the head of the predecessor of the city's DWP, the city-owned Bureau of Water Works and Supply. The separate MWD was established in 1928, at a time when Mulholland had already been chief engineer of the city's much older agency for ages. 
The MWD was formed with the purpose of acquiring water supplies for areas of Southern California outside the City of Los Angeles. Though today's Los Angeles DWP gets some of its water from the still-independent MWD, there was in 1928 no connection between the two, and Mulholland never ran the MWD. Neither Mulholland or the LADWP ever had offices in the Million Dollar Theatre's office building.
 
*Here's a history of the LADWP: 
*Here's a history of the MWD: 
I've removed the false information from this article and corrected the wiki-link to the Metropolitan Water District article. Whyaduck 23:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metropolitan Water District vs Department of Water and Power 

message: The section on the 2000s seems to need some updating, with more specific information about the church and the closing and the reopening, if anyone has that information. Jaardon (talk) 22:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would also be great if someone could explain what appear to be a barber shop and cantina/bar thing upstairs behind the balcony. Not being used anymore, but since when and what was that all about!? jengod (talk) 02:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent history (2000s) 

message: Relocated from the main article page: {jengod (talk) 02:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepe Crow's comments 

message: Sorry for my bad english, I'm french.
The spelling "theater" has been corrected three years ago, but the title of this article remains with "Theater". Should it be changed to "Theatre", that would be the same way of writing Grauman's Chinese Theatre ? According to this, it's "re" and not"er". Thanx for the answers.--Rehtse (talk) 08:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title : Theater or Theatre 

message: Can someone in Los Angeles please verify that this venue is still open?  The website name is available and the upcoming events is blank on DOLA.COM Pmarshal (talk) 04:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Million Dollar Theater in Los Angeles closed?