Talk:Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

message: I have added the POV tag because of this reversion of my NPOV edit made without justification or explanation.  This is the second article of mine that Jance/Jgwlaw has reverted for purely harassing reasons; see also the Fred Baron article and the discussion here. -- TedFrank 08:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any objections if I add links to a piece I wrote on the subject? -- TedFrank 06:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't find it ambiguous.  I understand what you're saying, but I don't think that passage implies what you think it does.  I had no trouble immediately understanding what that sentence meant.  The sentence is about the expansion of federal jurisdiction, and therefore the word "something" (that Republicans have historically protested) refers to that expansion of federal jurisdiction.  The fact that this sentence has remained in the article unchanged for five years seems to underscore my point, but if other readers agree with Travis325 and find it ambiguous, I suppose the word "something" could be replaced with "a result that", which should remove all perceived ambiguity.  Captain Quirk (talk) 03:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: POV tag

message: This article is rated "low-importance," which surprises me. There have been several important SCOTUS cases concerning CAFA in the last year or so; most recently, SCOTUS today reversed the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, holding that a class representative cannot defeat CAFA's federal-court jurisdiction by stipulating to less than $5 million in damages (because his stipulation does not bind the rest of the putative class). Here is the opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1450_9olb.pdf. Here is the SCOTUSblog page on the case: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1450_9olb.pdf. I think I will attempt to create a page for the case before contributing to a new section on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papillonderecherche (talk • contribs) 14:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs section on notable SCOTUS CAFA cases 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/cjr_03.pdfBeisner
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910230553/http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub7432.pdf to http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub7432.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070214015340/http://dir.salon.com/story/opinion/feature/2005/02/12/class_action/index.html to http://dir.salon.com/story/opinion/feature/2005/02/12/class_action/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified