Talk:KPDX

message: Baring any further proof, I'd like to propose a  quasi-reversion to the article with regards to KPDX's affiliation status. To my knowledge(and best educated guess), the change on April 1st was only a branding change in preparation for KPDX's move to My Network TV, and that they have not dropped plans to make this switch. Additionally, they are still a UPN affiliate at the moment(again, this was only a branding change) until the MNTV/CW switch. As such, unless someone can provide satisfactory proof that these plans have changed, they should continue to be listed as a UPN affiliate, continue to be listed as a network joining MNTV, and the April 1st change being listed as only a branding change.
ViRGE 03:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affiliate status 

message: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-meredith-time-inc-20171126-story.html
This proposed deal involves Time inc's assets and Meredith's assets coming into one entity. As of  November 2017 the Koch Brothers has been named as people involved in the deal. Its a pending deal that affects Meredith owned stations. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/business/dealbook/time-inc-meredith-corporation-koch-brothers.html?_r=0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.86.14.44 (talk) 23:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending Deal with Meredith and Time inc

message: :Image:PDX 49.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PDX 49.JPG

message: :Image:PDX49.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PDX49.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on KPDX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160218013408/http://nelson.oldradio.com/origins.call-list.html to http://nelson.oldradio.com/origins.call-list.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:KASN which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 06:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress