lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Rail trails in the United States

message: Rails with trails includes a map from a reliable source, showing 2 rails with trails in New Mexico.  One is the Santa Fe Rail Trail along the Santa Fe Southern Railway, but I cannot identify the other.  Based on the relative positions of the dots on that map, the mystery railroad is either somewhere east of Taos, or somewhere west of Albuquerque.  Help?  Please respond on Talk:Rails with trails.  Thanks!  --Una Smith (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Mexico mystery rail with trail
Talk:Crank forward

message: This article by Bob Bryant explains the context of Crank Forward bikes.  It is from BentRiderOnline.com, an online news source for riders of recumbent ("bent") bicycles, which also has also reports on Crank Forward bikes. (removed from article copy by Earthlyreason (talk) 12:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanatory article
Talk:Cycling at the 1956 Summer Olympics – Men's individual road race

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 23:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Cycling at the 1996 Summer Olympics – Men's time trial

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB/talk 11:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Dutchess Rail Trail

message: In the 1990s, the county proposed to turn this right-of-way into County Route 11, but the proposal was defeated in a public referendum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triskele Jim (talk • contribs) 16:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to find more about this. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  17:06, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Freeride mountain-biking films

message: "Freeride mountain-biking movies are films about freeride mountain-biking and downhill."
Assume I'm not familiar with the subject.  'Downhill' what?  Racing?  Just riding?  Plummeting? - Shrivenzale (talk) 15:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go out on a limb and assume I can use 'downhill cycling', as mentioned in categories.  - Shrivenzale (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarity

message: The term 'best' is usually pretty subjective and can be interpreted in various ways.  Firstly, we need to know by whose standards these listed movies are considered 'best'.  Obviously we want to avoid giving the impression that these are simply the best movies in the opinion of the article's creator, because Wikipedia's not intended to provide a platform for listing personal favourites.  So we could use citations supporting their status as 'best' - for example, from recognised sites or publications that review such productions and perhaps keep lists of their own.  Furthermore, it'd be good to know by what criteria a production is judged.  Are we talking about best production quality in the movie?  Best performances by those participating in the activity shown?  Or simply the most popular production in terms of purchases/downloads/whatever?  - Shrivenzale (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of best films and series
Talk:Marty Smyth

message: This page requires  tidy-up to fit in with the format of other WP:Poker articles. Poker Flunky (talk) 14:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 
Talk:List of rail trails in New York

message: Wouldn't this article be more useful if it included other trails in addition to rail trails, such as the Cayuga Lake paths in Ithaca or the proposed Patroon Creek trail in Albany?--Triskele Jim (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A list of Trails in New York might be a useful page. RussNelson (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added List of trails on New York state.  How do I fix the typo in the title?--Triskele Jim --Triskele Jim (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The bar at the top of the article has "article", "discussion", "edit this page" ..... "move".  Click on move.  RussNelson (talk) 19:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

text:  Doesn't the Mohawk Hudson Trail deserve it's own page?--Triskele Jim --Triskele Jim (talk) 19:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, absolutely, every trail should have its own page.  In time ... they will.  Feel free to pick one you know about and write it up!  RussNelson (talk) 19:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: West of Schenectady, the Mohawk Hudson Bike/Hike Path is a canal towpath trail. Should this be mentioned in the list? If so, how? Or is it okay as it is now? --Triskele Jim 17:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. Didn't a lot of those canal towpaths become railroad lines, or weren't some of them at least owned by railroads? -------User:DanTD (talk)  00:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to point out something else; If and when the Laurel Hill Rail Trail is expanded along the right-of-way for the Babylon-Northport Expressway (a road I think should never have been cancelled), it will become a partial rail-trail too. I don't think it should be eliminated from the list once that happens. -------User:DanTD (talk)  00:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Trails that are only partly rail trails

message: ... include: 
* Chittenango Gorge trail, Cazenovia, New York
* Link Trail, Madison County, New York, near Chittenango Falls State Park
Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any concrete evidence that the former segment of the Central Railroad of Long Island main line within the Kissena Park Corridor is an official rail trail? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional rail trails in New York
Talk:Newfoundland T'Railway

message: What does T'Railway stand for? This article doesn't clarify this.Ozdaren (talk) 21:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it's just meant to be a play on words -- "trail" + "railway" = "(t)railway".  The use of an apostrophe is a bit weird, but I guess it would be difficult to distinguish the "railway" part of it otherwise. WillNL (talk) 17:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  T'Railway??
Talk:Crayon Physics Deluxe

message: When, oh dear god, when?! Jstohler (talk) 12:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm assuming it's for PC? --Thaddius (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it to the correct name. --blurpeace (talk - contributions) 20:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The iPhone version can run on the iPad, but there is no iPad specific version that I could find in the App Store --CaspianM (talk) 05:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform? 

message: The first sentence of this article implies that Crayon Physics Deluxe was released on June 1, 2007. Clearly that is just plain wrong. This article was originally about a game called Crayon Physics which was released on that day. That game later got a sequel called Crayon Physics Deluxe. I propose that whoever messed this up fixes it too. —ZeroOne (talk / @) 00:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold.  Xihr  06:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crayon Physics vs Crayon Physics Deluxe 

message: It should be noted that there is a similar Nintendo DS homebrew called Pocket Physics.
It is obviously inspired, if nothing else, by Crayon Physics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.113.53.13 (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DS homebrew 

message: The sources I've seen say Crayon Physics is included with some Galaxy Note devices (possibly all). Is this the older Crayon Physics or Crayon Physics Deluxe by another name? --CaspianM (talk) 05:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Android version 

message: The soundtrack is created by C418. Should that be added?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.216.159.32 (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack
Talk:TRPM8

message: Added a great deal of new content to address the TRPM8 (cold and menthol receptor). The current Wikipedia page on the topic was lacking and the information already included there was added to the additional research provided. Added links out of this page as well.
Freshmandeezy (talk) 23:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Borås

message: There should be disambiguation links for both Göta and Kristineberg. The one for Göta goes now to a page about a name, and the one for Kristineberg goes to a place in Stockholm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulfgeir (talk • contribs) 14:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Actually I think the scissors of the city arms are not sheep-shearing scissors but rather scissors for cutting metal (Swedish: plåtsaxar) and calling them sheep-shearing scissors is a popular misunderstanding.  But today I don't have a source for that. Fomalhaut76 (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The official blazon says: I rött fält två ullsaxar av silver, den högra störtad. I am not cabable to translate it into the odd heraldic English but "ullsax" means "wool scissors". So I think sheep-shearing scissors is correct. --Muniswede (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The scissors
Talk:University of Edinburgh Medical School

message: The historical account of the Edinburgh Medical School contains major inaccuracies. For example, it was the University of Edinburgh (or rather the College of James VI King of Scots) which was modelled on the universities at Padua and Bologna, not the recently established College of Medicine. The Faculty of Medicine was set up in 1726, but MD degrees were awarded by the university before that, to those educated and/or trained elsewhere and examined by the Royal College of Physicians. The early teaching of anatomy in Edinburgh was by the surgeons, who had their own anatomy theatre, and Alexander Monro Primus at first taught on their premises, rather than in the university. The extramural medical school was as important as the university's in the 19th century, and lasted in the form of the School of Medicine of the Royal Colleges until the second world war: large numbers of Jewish Americans qualified there before returning to work in the United States. NRPanikker (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Inaccuracies

message: Although I have some doubt that the article was copied from somewhere, that's not my main concern. What really gets me is that there are some inherently deep problems with the article and its structure, take the section "Contact" for example; do we actually need it in an article? How about inaccuracies with the article, most stunning is the one in the introduction stating that Uni of Ed accepts some 200 British applicants, while it should be EU/Home applicants. I am going to edit the article unless someone objects to my editing below/
:Cheers!
:Λuα (Operibus anteire) 20:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious problems 
Talk:Alien Abduction Trauma and Recovery

message: I am tidying up this article but it will take some time. Biscuittin (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done all I can with it.  Perhaps someone else could tidy up the loose ends.  I think there's a couple of references missing. Biscuittin (talk) 19:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

message: You forgot that those who report being abducted are treated AS being nuts, assholes, crazy, full of shit, worse, courtesy of CIA programs, such as the Robertson Panel. This should be included, since this often happens, too damn frequently. 65.173.105.114 (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Forgot [[Robertson Panel|Enforced Ridicule]]

message: *Proposed merge. There is not too much material for one article on the whole phenomenon, including how cases are treated. Itsmejudith (talk) 13:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposal is to merge with Abduction phenomenon.  I agree with the proposal. Blueboar (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Somebody should run a check on that.  It sounds pretty wacky. --Denise from the Cosby Show (talk) 01:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  section on SIMBAD
Talk:Rudi Fehr

message: The article may contain information that is relevant and true, but it is written in a very non-objective, unencyclopædic style, with large swathes of P.O.V. The paragraph beginning “His work on Beyond the Forest (1949) is an under appreciated masterpiece of editing…” is a particularly slanted one, for example. I actually came here to find out more about his credit on Peter Bogdanovich’s “Paper Moon”, where it is noted he supplied the records used on the soundtrack were from his collection: was he an audiophile/ collector/ musicologist/ preserver of records, as well as being a film editor? Or did he just happen to have old records and know Peter Bogdanovich? Jock123 (talk) 15:43, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is 1 paragraph of original research that's been tagged for about 18 months. I suppose that paragraph could be deleted at this point, since no one has stepped up to source it. Other than that, I didn't understand why you thought the article wasn't objective. The credit in Paper Moon is interesting. A bit of research turned up this link: http://www.bampfa.berkeley.edu/film/FN17556 . Not sure it adds anything to what you know already. Easchiff (talk) 17:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  P.O.V. 

message: The United States Information Agency broadcast an interview with Fehr. It isn't clear whether this interview is accessible. See  Easchiff (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  United State Information Agency - Interview with Fehr 
Talk:China National Nuclear Corporation

message: Should there be a disambiguation of the acronym CNNC between China National Nuclear Corporation and the travel agency that is also cnnc (www.cnnc.com)?
--Kuanda (talk) 05:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed? 

message: Details on the chinese designs can be found - for example for the CNP-300 at https://www.uxc.com/smr/uxc_SMRDetail.aspx?key=CNP-300.
Maybe interesting information like "two-loop PWR design", "310 MWe gross (288 MWe net)", "China's first domestic commercial reactor design" could be worked into the article.
--BjKa (talk) 14:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactor Info 

message: The third Ministry of Machine Building is founded in 1955/1956. CNNC per se is registered as a company in 1988. The history section needs more reference to reflect this. -Mys_721tx (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Reference are needed 

message: Bjjjhh 194.168.26.37 (talk) 11:39, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yeushhshsh
Talk:Hillman Super Minx

message: I've been wondering whether someone would (or should) to give this thing its own article for several months.   Does anyone have a strong opinion either way?   In favour of a new article:  it was a new shape, and was around, initially with a wrap around back window and later with a (Volvo inspired??) six light profile for maybe five years.  It was characteristic of its time and place.  Being slightly larger than the 'normal' Minx, it paved the way for the Hillman Hunter.   And in my simple way, I find life simpler if, when in doubt, articles involving several models / shapes of car are disaggregated.  On the other hand, the Super Minx was done on the cheap:  the bits you could see were distinctive, but as far as possible, the bits you couldn't see came from the lighter Minx models.   Then again, whether or not you (or I) like a car probably shouldn't sway the argument either way.   And someone has set up at least one link (on the Minx page) in contemplation of a separate Super Minx page.   Charles01 (talk) 14:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've grasped the thorn again as part of the process of sorting out the remaining, neglected Rootes articles. I think it really does deserve its own article because it was marketed very much as a separate model, and (although this is, unless I find a reference, PoV and OR) I think it was also strongly perceived as "related but separate" at the time — certainly more so than, say for example, the Opel Manta and Opel Ascona were. – Kieran T (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does it deserve its own article?

message: This redlink I've inserted because I think it's verging on jargon and could do with being explained. (And it's not the present article's job to do that.) Perhaps all that's required is a passage in the car body style article, although that may be merging with various other articles soon (such as vehicle size classification etc. — there's a bit of a mélange of such articles!) – Kieran T (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Six light
Talk:Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

message: The article doesn't say where in China it is. rʨanaɢ (formerly Politizer)talk/contribs 04:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is it? 

message: Hi, I'm an American currently working as an editor for the English-language edition of Chinese Social Sciences Today, a newspaper operated by CASS, and I was wondering if it would be acceptable for me to contribute to editing this page and related pages, such as bios of CASS scholars. Normally, I would steer clear of any semblance of conflict-of-interest, but I think maybe an exception should be made given that there is a paucity of people who are knowledgeable on this relatively obscure topic and I have access to a lot of useful information that is inaccessible to most people, especially if they don't speak Chinese. For instance, my colleagues are interested in helping out too. We translate dense academic articles for a living, so I think we could really help expand the amount of English translations of Chinese primary sources.
We're not being instructed or paid by our bosses to do this. I mean I guess there is no way to know for sure, so you have to take my word for it that I'm doing this of my own volition. And I have no particular interest in pushing any kind of POV. Mainly I just want to add some non-controversial biographical information and enhance the articles with pictures. Also I'm a professional editor and journalist with more than 10 years experience writing and editing, so I could contribute a lot in terms of polishing up the language. --RedHermit1982 (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest?
Talk:Geography of the Netherlands

message: While you maybe right that 'some surveys' include Delft in the The Hague large agglomeration, the sources provided at the top of the list do not include it. Based on these sources Delft cannot be listed. If there are other sources that explciitly include Delft, these should be used, instead of the current ones. 
This does however raise the point how well-defined the agglomerations are when different surveys arrive at different conclusions. I would suggest that we make a short introduction stating that there is general agreement, but that some small differences between surveys (and probably institutes) exist. That this does not matter for the gist of the argument and that we will adopt the agglomeration definition of CBS / NIDI or whatever relevant Dutch institute we can come up with. Does that sound ok? Arnoutf (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The list I have used should correspond exactly to the list of Grootstedelijke agglomeraties en het peri-urbane gebied, not including Delft. You are right. This source provided our data, extracted from <2004k4v4p037art.pdf>, on p.46. Ad43 (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I had some trouble finding the 2004 document, I located a newer version of the map and list from 2007  , perhaps useful to know. Arnoutf (talk) 11:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I think this clustering is basicly or completely the same. Underlying article is: Werken in het stadsgewest: herkomst en bestemming van forensen, by Mathieu Vliegen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad43 (talk • contribs) 11:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delft issue

message: For some reason Emmen was mentioned in this list, which is wrong. The number of inhabitants for the city of Emmen is around 55000. The municipality has 100000+.
NitroX infinity (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest Cities

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 14:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Geography of the European Netherlands →  – First of all it is a common name of the subject, Geography of the Netherlands, please check out any search, plain google, scholars, books etc. It is also creates a confusion, see the section European Netherlands OR the constituent country of the kingdom? directly above. For Denmark the article's titles is Geography of Denmark with a hatnote: This article is about Denmark proper. For the geography of the Danish Kingdom's autonomous territories, see Geography of the Faroe Islands and Geography of Greenland. For France the article's titles is Geography of France and not Geography of Metropolitan France or Geography of European France. Dgvby (talk) 08:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 31 August 2022
Talk:Karting World Championship

message: Where does this championship fit in? Alex O'Grady is the new World Champion of the IAME Minime Cadet class at the World Finals at the Le Mans circuit, 10-year-old Irish star wins karting World Championship in Le Mans, France Bogger (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "IAME World Championships"