lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Car game

message: While "car games" and "travel games" are clearly related categories, there are significant differences. Travel games are games whose components are designed to be compact and resistant to jostling, while car games are designed to be played without components, or with the items at hand on a typical journey (much akin to parlour games). The results are therefore very stylistically different. --Stellmach 14:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sod it, I've merged them together. --Dangherous 02:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Skeptical of Merge

message: Should Racing Game and Car combat game be removed?  I believe that if anything, a section at the top similar to what exists with brinkmanship would be appropriate for racing game.  Otherwise they don't really have a connection to this article. Ryan Vesey (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Alena Popchanka

message: I believe Popchanka and her husband moved back to France post-the 2008 Olympics, following her husband getting a new job as the head coach with a club team in France (Race Club France, I believe). Hooperswim (talk) 03:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved to France in late 2008?
Talk:Virtual power plant

message: no information on the tags why they are there, The neutrality of this article is disputed. (September 2013)
This article appears to be written like an advertisement. (April 2012), so, i removed them.Mion (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  tags ? 

message: Here are useful and current references.
  I will try and return to integrate these into the article.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 16:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful references, Gallucci (2016a) and Gallucci (2016b) 

message: The article isn't mentioning what might become the most useful part of a VPP; demand response. Need to find some good sources Digital20 (talk) 14:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demand Response 

message: It may not be enough (right now) to be worth mentioning in the article, but Victoria is running a trial program that is currently in the research stage until the end of 2024, at which point I would expect them to release some kind of statistics which would likely be worth a mention.  Dave247 (talk) 11:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful resources for Australia
Talk:David Van Driessen

message: When exactly were Van Driessen and Buzzcut's first names given as David and Bradley?
---WalterJid 14:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At least once during the series for both, as well as in the canonical books. - Chadbryant 22:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I only put him in the Democrats and vegetarians section because there isn't a category called "Fictional hippies". - Ndrly 00:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democrat 

message: Not even a mention for Van Dreisen's acoustic magnum opus? Plutonium27 (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lesbian Seagull
Talk:Attack on Broome

message: (Dai) Kōkū Sentai is a Carrier Division or Air Flotilla -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentai --DOMartin (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dai 3 Kohkuu Sentai
Talk:Legit (professional wrestling)

message: The reference link is now broken (#1) Uniquely Fabricated (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: "Legit" is not exactly the same as "shoot".  A "shoot" occurs when the script is not followed and the crowd and TV audience, if there is one, see actual, unscripted occurances.  While this may be "legit", there are "legit" occurances outside of the context of a "shoot", and terms such as "legit heat" and "legit talent" would make no sense if expressed as "shoot heat" or "shoot talent", and this is why the two articles should remain separate.  Rlquall 14:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also misleading to state that the reason that many pro wrestling fans find "real" or "legit" matches to be dull because someone seeks actually to win them and not embarass himself.  They are dull (when they are) because there are no gimmicks, no spots, and no face vs. heel heat.  It takes a whole lot of legit skill by both contestants for "real" wrestling not to be deadly dull to anyone but purists.  It takes less ability to keep a match interesting when one can introduce gimmicks such as foreign objects, outside interference, and the like.  This is not to say that pro wrestlers lack legit talent – most have a considerable level of it.  But for wrestling to draw large amounts of long-term interest at a high level, traditionally kayfabe has always had to be part of it.  Rlquall 14:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shoot

message: Does a background in bodybuilding, running, swimming, gymnastics, shot put, javelin, volleyball, basketball or baseball really qualify a wrestler to be classed as 'legit'? Alexrushfear (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Legit?
Talk:Johann Rudolf Glauber

message: This bio seems a bit weak, don't you think?  "He was born, and 50 years later he moved to Amsterdam".  The guy wrote 31 books, after all!
Dunnhaupt 14:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Walkerma (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The german wikipedia entry lists the date. I have simply copied that date to the english version; I hope the date is correct, if it is not then the
fault is in the german entry, not the english one, since the entry in the english one here is just a copy/paste now. Thanks. 2A02:8388:1600:6900:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Mariusz Zielinski

message: This page needs a major fixup. —Gm1121983 14:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cedric, shut your mouth! Or I'm telling Connie! (Mrs. Colosimo, the teacher at the Transition House) —The Pope
No, Cedric was right. This page appears vandalized. —Mr. Conrad 14:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

text: So since we don't delete talk pages here, should I put  on the page? —Gm1121983 03:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Al Jazeera Urdu

message: «Al Jazeera is said to be considering launching music television channels»
:Wow! But it looks like it's very far from AlJazira's media theme. Would that music channel air extremely conservative religious music :S ?? --Mahmudmasri (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Jazeera music 

message: When will it start?        --88.117.65.208 (talk) 08:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AJ Urdu 

message: Al Jazeera Media Network says Al Jazeera Urdu was intended for Pakistan and Al Jazeera Urdu artcle says it was intended for Indian audience with Zee networks. Which 1 is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.193.156.233 (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrary/conflicting information between 2 wiki articles
Talk:Astronomical year numbering

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 18:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Cañal Bajo Carlos Hott Siebert Airport

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cañal Bajo Carlos Hott Siebert Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081224155113/http://aipchile.cl/dasa/aip_chile_con_contenido/aip.php?op=ver&aip=chile&tipo=ad&subtipo=ad3&pagina=39131 to http://aipchile.cl/dasa/aip_chile_con_contenido/aip.php?op=ver&aip=chile&tipo=ad&subtipo=ad3&pagina=39131
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Newman Airport

message: Where is the evidence that the Nauru based airline flies to Brisbane?  The only thing I can see is a picture on the airport's website of a Nauru jet.  Charter I suspect Kransky (talk) 13:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Our Airline 
Talk:Microaerophile

message: --Alex 15:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Do they require oxygen for growth or viability?  I'll investigate, but does anyone else have info?
:They don't, they're wrongly classified in this article...they're either obligate or aerotolerant anaerobes. --178.197.229.27 (talk) 12:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with User:178.197.229.27.  The clue is in the name.  'Micro' means small, 'aero' means oxygen, and 'philic' means loving.  Quoting from Stuart Hogg's 'Essential Microbiology' (page 99), "Microaerophiles require oxygen, but are only able to tolerate low concentrations of it (2-10%), finding higher concentrations harmful." Microbiology enthusiast (talk) 09:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Require oxygen to survive? 

message: According to the source http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16814991 borrelia don't need oxygen. So they aren't microaerophile but obligate anaerobe. This is important for patients, because they should increase their oxygen intake. --178.197.236.82 (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, some Borellia are obligate anaerobe (inhibited growth by oxygen) and some have aerotolerance according to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16814991. --178.197.226.131 (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, User:178.197.236.82 and User:178.197.226.131.  I've removed Borrelia from the article. Lialono (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borrelia is wrongly classified
Talk:Cityscape of Huntington, West Virginia

message: Do you intend on producing a discussion out of this? The article isn't even finished and you are already rushing to conclusions? Some of the information has been moved around from the original Huntington article as well...  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:The Bewlay Brothers

message: I don't understand why this song is considered abstract or impenetrable.
Lines like "I was Stone and he was Wax / So he could scream, / and still relax, unbelievable", or "and the solid book we wrote / Cannot be found today" would seem to describe a long-term gay relationship.
: could you elucidate on the last plz? i am not seeing it.
I am aware of the power of the Rorschach inkblot test; I don't go reading this topic into all the abstract impenetrable art out there.
Isn't there a review, somewhere, that points out this obvious detail, so we can grandfather it in?
Compare Bohemian_Rhapsody, which is _not_ abstract, because it's a parody of a rock opera. Nobody pointed that out on the page, leaving the page open to wild alternative theories...
:Eh? Hmm, yes...But there are bits of brother in there too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timtak (talk • contribs) 12:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It has been suggested (e.g. in a new book by Peter Doggett) that the title has some connection with a chain of tobacco shops known as the House of Bewlay.  The House of Bewlay chain did exist (I can remember it myself, and there is a further reference here http://www.mcgaheythetobacconist.co.uk/ask_martin_arch.asp?offset=-1 , and see this photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/carrie132/5313851998/), but does anyone know of any confirmation, preferably from David Bowie himself, that it has anything to do with the song?  I guess the connection could be that the young David Jones and his friends (and/or brother) were no strangers to tobacco shops!109.158.240.103 (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song title 

message: https://www.quotescosmos.com/bible/bible-concordance/H7121-3.html
That are bidden, forth, self, guest, invite, mention, preach, pronounce, publish, read, renowned, say, to call out to (i.e., properly, address by name, but used in a wide variety of applications) 5.70.10.5 (talk) 21:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: aplogies forgot to add the Shakespearean adaptation of the same. The Brother. https://www.shakespeareswords.com/Public/Glossary.aspx?id=1614 5.70.10.5 (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning - i thought this was to do with the Hebrew
Talk:Executioner

message: Should there be some bit about the common executioner stereotype of wearing a mask to prevent 
identification and possible reprisals ? --80.222.74.129 15:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The al-Beshi family has provided the executioners for the Saud family since before the establishment of Saudi Arabia. Of course the current executioner gave an interview for the Arab News, but I had one of his sons in my class. Nice guy. He reports that each job pays SAR5,000, plus free airfare, plus the sword he uses is a gift from the government. I would have mentioned all this, but there is no obvious place to put it in the discussion of French families of executioners.   Paul, in Saudi 04:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: al-Beshi 

message: I know mostly from pop culture that modern executioners are jailers or other law enforcement officers who are chosen by volunteering or by lot, is there any information that can be added to this article on that?  Or is it just pop culture?
BaikinMan 17:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Executioners?
Talk:List of platform-independent GUI libraries

message: I notice that this article uses "X/Motif" to denote that the PIGUI is usable under the X Window System.  The Motif toolkit is just another toolkit that's usable under X.  At least one of the PIGUI packages listed here, Qt, has nothing to do with Motif.  It would be more accurate to denote the packages which support X with either "X Window System" or the shorter "X11". — Wwagner 15:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, will do. Webaware 07:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment about "X/Motif"

message: On a similar note... one of the platforms listed is "OpenLook", which is not a platform.  Strictly speaking, it's not even a thing; it's a common misspelling of either OPEN LOOK or OpenWindows.  OPEN LOOK is a look and feel, OpenWindows is a way obsolete implementation of X11 specific to older releases of SunOS or Solaris.
OpenLook on Wikipedia is a redirect to the OPEN LOOK l&f; is that what's intended in this article?--NapoliRoma 08:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment about "OpenLook" 

message: Galaxy appears to have been acquired by a company called Ambiencia.  See here:
* http://ambiencia.com/overviewgalaxy.php
--Tony Sidaway 19:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Galaxy

message: It seems to me GTK+ and FLTK are not for developing once and obtaining a UI for each platform.
I believe you can install these tools on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
A true cross- platform UI developed once will be Apache Cordova.
Thanks,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diegocapadi (talk • contribs) 14:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  It seems to me GTK+ and FLTK are not for developing once and obtaining a UI for each platform 

message: Libui could be mentioned and added to the table; I won't do so myself due to a conflict of interest (having used it quite a lot lately and I can say it works on linux and windows quite ok). I actually came to look for alternatives to libui. The wikipedia page here could need some updates, in particular what "cross-platform" really entails to. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:6D3E:54F:D1:F386 (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions and Clarifications 

message: I'd like to propose adding a short "Created" entry. Aka "gtk was created in 1999" or something like this. Can be a short entry to keep the table narrow-ish.
Use case and reasoning: via such an entry, the visitor could quickly sort it for the more recently created toolkits - perhaps these may be still actively maintained, for instance. That was my use case originally when I came here - I wanted to find alternatives to libui. I know that some exist on github but I am not good at finding these, so wikipedia should help there, IMO. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:6D3E:54F:D1:F386 (talk) 20:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for a new column/Row
Talk:Californian stamps

message: 1 ton per (hour?) - needs time unit. - Leonard G. 15:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capacity

message: I see no harm in this.  Adding this short article to Stamp mill will probably improve both articles.   Peterkingiron (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Economics Chapter of the System Dynamics Society

message: I have removed the following list of publications because they don't relate to the subject "Economics Chapter of the System Dynamics Society" directly. In articles like this only publications directly related to the subject should be allowed. - Mdd 11:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected bibliography - removed 

message: I removed the following links, which are not directly related to the subject and shouldn't have been within the article (but at the end) in the first place.- Mdd 11:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Model Databases

message: I removed the following part, because I don't understand how this is related - Mdd 12:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Teaching 

message: I removed most of the external links - Mdd 12:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renmoved most of the External links
Talk:Mark (professional wrestling)

message: Far from playing to the marks, it is more arugable that the WWE ignores them and is aimed solely at smarks and smarts, especially since the name change (even though it grew out of a lawsuit from the World Wildlife Federation) to "Entertainment" and McMahon's known desire not to have to have real ambulances, etc., on site at all matches as would be required by state athletic commissions and insurers if matches were "real", and his overall desire not to be regulated or bothered by state athletic commissions at all.  All of the current WWE peformers now readily admit that there are theatical elements to the storyline, that there are differences between their real persona and their gimmicks, and generally break kayfabe, and argue that the entertainment experience is better as a result, as selling moves and suspension of disbelief required represents a higher level of talent than previously required when kayfabe was not publicly broken.
To be a "mark" in the traditional with regard to the WWE would require one to be extremely young and naive or just willingly to blind oneself to how the WWE now openly operates.  Perhaps traditional marks may exist in the followings of some indy promotions or some non-U.S. promotions, but to say that WWE is currently (2006) aimed at marks seems to be, well, off the mark.  Rlquall 15:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is very true.  Hybrid 06:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I see where you are coming from, and how you could have missed this.  Everyone who enjoys wrestling is called a wrestling fan.  Marks and Smarks are the two types of wrestling fan.  We tend to identify ourselves as one or the other because we typically hate the other kind of fan.  I am a smark, I hate marks, and they hate me; its a hate-hate relationship.  Also, being a devoted fan doesn't make you a mark, thinking wrestling is real makes you a mark.  The main point you were supossed to get from that sentence in the article was that marks tend to be young and naïve.  That is basically what the (s)mark thing is about.  P.S. Please sign your comments.  Hybrid 09:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE
Template talk:Elizabeth Islands

message: The template should not have information that would require citation (such as ownership, etc). That information should be put on the pages for individual islands or for the islands as a whole, but not the template. In this way we avoid the messy problem of having to embed references into a template, and otherwise giving people a reason to frequently update templates. -Harmil 15:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I mostly agree. I like the smaller version, but I'm also a fan of having some description to give the reader context as in Template:Steels. But I like the change you made. —Ben FrantzDale 16:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there were some basic defining facts that could be placed next to each island, that would potentially make sense, but they're really just islands. Some distinction between public and private might be useful, but I'm not sure. -Harmil 16:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island information in template
Talk:Nisei Week

message: In the "Pageant Controversy" section, the word "happa" is used but not defined.  As not all readers are familiar with this term, it may be better to use a different term that is generally understandable to English speakers or define the meaning of this word.--Csu-am 16:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Falsedef 18:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Photos of the "LA Nebuta, the final float at the 2007 Nisei Week parade" and "Tanabata Festival" are already attached to article. Not enough? Are you looking for crowd scene, officials, marchers? Ucla90024 (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Moapa Valley, Nevada

message: I have added some historical information to this article, thanks to a book I picked up at the Lost City Museum last weekend.  I am working on research to fill in more recent history.  I hope to have that done by the middle of September.  Bvburnes 15:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in Progress 

message: Freddy Ortega was recruited by BYU? For what sport...I think some focus should be taken off the high school, and likewise a separate high school page may be necessarily. The high school article is also reminiscient of a person involved in band, forensics, and tennis. Any takers? Thanks... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flanhelsinki (talk • contribs) 03:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Abu badali

message: Optional question(s) for candidate
# Have you read the book Free Culture by Lawrence Lessig, founder of Creative Commons?  You can download it from here.  Also, why do you think there is a problem with the 1930 Butterick catalog?  Such a catalog would have entered the public domain in 1958 unless copyright renewal paperwork was filed that year, and I don't see any Butterick renewals in the LOC database from anytime around then (no surprise, about 85% of copyrights were not renewed, back in the days when renewal was necessary, and a 28-year-old catalog is just the sort of thing that most companies wouldn't bother to renew).  Does Wikipedia actually have a policy about not using such materials even though they're probably in the public domain?  I didn't see anything about that at WP:C. I see at WP:IUP#Public_domain there is a rather inflexible prescription spelled out: don't use anything newer than 1923, with no attention whatsoever given to whether the copyright was renewed (or even ever existed).  Should something be done about that, and if so, what, and by who?  Phr (talk) 12:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This has nothing to do with being an admin, and as such, I've moved it here.  Ral315 (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Alison Booker

message: I removed this sentence: "Once, during a general election, she promised listeners that the following show would feature a discussion between no fewer than 13 candidates for the same parliamentary seat. In short, a mass debate." - it doesn't really say whether she actually held the debate, plus it's unsourced. --h2g2bob 16:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted sentence