lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ordinary (liturgy)

message: Why J.S.Bach was not mentioned in the Music section?
:I added him and Bruckner. Maybe some of the others should be removed (Zumaya, Brahms, Rheinberger), unless a complete listing is wanted; in that case many other mass-writers should appear. Did Hildegard of Bingen write a mass? I believed Machaut was the first one to do that. Apus 13:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Machaut was the first (known) to write a polyphonic mass. That said, I'm not sure Hildegard wrote one, especially of just the ordinary; I haven't heard of it. Rigadoun  (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Maybe best if the main article on the mass (liturgy) goes into the greatest liturgical depth.   I'd be really happy to see Anglican treatment of the ordinary as such here, as well as the Eastern rite equivalent. Sparafucil 09:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neglect?
Talk:Apple scruffs

message: I see the scruffs "raided his closet for a pair of pants which they took turns wearing". To a Brit this means the girls took turns wearing his underpants! As far as Paul is concerned they would have raided his wardrobe for a pair of trousers, so I propose to substitute those words, if I'm right in thinking this would not detract for readers of other nationalities. PL290 (talk) 12:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Quite right. Yet another American Beatle ‘scholar’ twists history. One of these corn-pone jokers once wrote that John Lennon was a fan of ‘Goon’s Show’, ‘a sit-com starring Peter Sellers’. Oh my gawd...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:5C56:6649:E8C4:E488 (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The pants of Paul

message: Do the two girl fans Lennon brought in from the front steps of Abbey Road to sing on his ‘Across the Universe’ count as Apple scruffs ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:5C56:6649:E8C4:E488 (talk) 21:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: They do. I don't understand why they are not mentioned in this article.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it has been pointed out to me that the recording of "Across the Universe" predates the formation of Apple and the opening of their Savile Row headquarters by a few months, so calling the girls "Apple Scruffs" would be inaccurate.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Across the Universe 
Talk:Maratus

message: Hi anyone, how do I remove these hidden categories
Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements</br>
Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from June 2016</br>
Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting</br>
Category:Pages with reference errors
now that the page has been fixed? Robertwhyteus (talk) 03:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The last two have gone. The first two are quite correct and hence should be there. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assistance please: Removing Hidden Categories
Talk:Microhasarius

message: For internal consistency I am minded to change the (1997) inline reference in the introduction to a Harvard Reference style to match the references cited under "Species".  Any comments?  Oxonhutch 10:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have consolidated the references and directed the in-line citation to a note.  Oxonhutch 12:08, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Mexigonus

message: Review of the genus Mexigonus (Araneae, Salticidae) and description of 59 new species - UBC Library Open Collections
 https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0396671
There's different species groups. I don't really have the boldness to risk starting to add some and not finishing so I'm just going to leave the source here Feralcateater000 (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2021 master's thesis has added over 60 species to the genus
Talk:1964 British football match-fixing scandal

message: Please note thata discussion relevant to the name of this article has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#1964_British_football_match-fixing_scandal_-_should_it_be_English_football?. I would also note that the article says "The British betting scandal of 1964 was a scandal in English association football" so arguably contradicts itself in terms of naming. Dunarc (talk) 19:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming - British or English
Template talk:WikiProject Pink Floyd

message: Can some explain why the album and song parameters have been removed from this template with this edit? It was explained that it causes problems but not how, but now all Pink Floyd albums and songs with this template are not assessed for the albums and songs projects. If multiple project parameters causes an issue, then wouldn't , , , and  need to be fixed as well? Otherwise, my request is for that change to be reverted. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: the best person to ask would be editor Kaldari, who made the changes. Also, this template is "semi"-protected, which appears to mean that you can still edit it and need no help with editing. Hope you are able to resolve this amicably!  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  02:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Each project should be on its own. Odd no one ever noticed this before now.--Moxy (talk) 02:21, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  The problem it causes is that it makes the PageAssessments extension (which provides data to XTools, Pageviews tool, CopyPatrol, and other Tool Forge tools) think that WikiProject Songs and WikiProject Albums are both stand-alone WikiProjects and subprojects of WikiProject Pink Floyd. The templates for  and  should be added seperately. Hope that's OK. Kaldari (talk) 05:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I will see if I can delete the same parameters from the other projects that use them. I think the Beatles project participants may not like it, but I will link to your explanation. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request
Talk:Peter Brown (music manager)

message: If yes, please change the parameter in the WPBeatles above to living=yes and add the article to :Category:Living people. If he's dead, please add the year of death to the article. --kingboyk 21:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Still alive?

message: I followed the Brown Lloyd James link left by the previous poster... and discovered that not only had he totally disregarded the existing page, effectively sticking another complete entry on top of it, but a look here shows at least a couple of his paragraphs were plagiarised, from an existing Peter Brown biography. (It was bad enough that his contribution read more like a commercial, than a serious entry; apparently it wasn't even his commercial.) Zephyrad 07:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: And speaking of ignoring...

message: There is an error in the reference to the Bloomberg article about Peter Brown (which I wrote). Here is the correct reference an external link: 
Roston, Eric (2013) "The Beatles vs. The Taxman: A Manager Recalls Yesterday", Bloomberg.com, 22 March 2013, retrieved 2013-04-30
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-22/the-beatles-v-the-taxman-a-former-manager-recalls-yesterday-.html
Thank you. 
ER—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eroston (talk • contribs) 14:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Sullivan University

message: Per request from ElKevbo regarding COI I am opening a talk on the legal issues section.
* Specific text to be added or removed: In a 2009 lawsuit, it was disclosed that the organization held just $20 million in cash reserves though the Sullivan University System distributed $77 million over the previous 10 years to its two sole stockholders, Chancellor Alva Sullivan and ex-wife Patricia Schrenk. These distributions excluded salaries, bonuses, and other benefits received from employment with the organization. In her filing, Schrenk alleged that college funds were used to pay for personal vacations, to settle sexual harassment lawsuits, and for private lawn care at the stockholders' residences. Though the lawsuit was not lodged against the Sullivan University System, its relatively low cash reserves despite the large distributions made to its stockholders made local and regional news.
* Reason for the change: The 2009 lawsuit involving Ms. Patricia Schrenk included figures that were alleged, this is key. These allegations were found to be untrue as the courts ruled against her. Leaving unfounded allegations on the page as a statement of fact creates inherent issues. Additionally, while the figures regarding how much cash the college held compared to the individuals are true, the use of those disbursements is not true. "In a 2009 letter, Sullivan told his ex-wife that the college held $20 million in cash reserves and during the past 10 years had distributed $77 million to the two of them to pay related corporate and personal taxes".
* References supporting change: https://law.justia.com/cases/kentucky/court-of-appeals/2012/2010-ca-001961-mr.html, https://www.kentucky.com/news/local/education/article44139933.html
Louisvilleguy457 (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  PK650 (talk) 22:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done for now:  I haven't implemented your first request, for two reasons. A) the second source is behind a paywall; b) I think the paragraph could be improved with due weight given to the other side of the story, in this case the appellant. If you could draft such a statement I'd be happy to review it. PK650 (talk) 22:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal Issues
Talk:Phaeacius

message: Malaya is a disambiguation page. --Ettrig (talk) 10:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Btw, Malaya is an obsolete name. By Malaya do you mean the Malay Peninsula, Malaysia, or the Malay Archipelago? I've replaced "Malaya" with Malay Peninsula for now. - Yk (talk | contrib) 14:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

text: The source wasn't that specific, your edit is OK. --Philcha (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Malaya

message: *"salticids including Phaeacius are the only spiders with good vision" (stated twice in the article)
**All non-primitive hunting spiders (Lycosidae, Thomisidae, Salticidae) have good vision. Indeed, our article on Lycosidae says this in the second sentence. Salticids just happen to have the best vision.
*** New Zealand Journal of Zoology 1986 p 521, right column: "the cursorial spiders can be divided in to two further groups, those with acute vision ('visual hunters': the Salticidae) and species with poor vision ('non-visual hunters')" --Philcha (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article
Talk:Kansas Territory

message: What happened to the piece that didn't become the state until it became part of Colorado? Did it remain Kansas Territory, just without a governor or capital? The act defining the state on the one hand implies that the territory became the state, but on the other hand clearly defines the state at its current borders. --SPUI (T - C) 08:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Guess I would guess that it still remained called "Kansas Territory" until it was reorganized into whatever entity it would be next, and that may have been the state of Colorado.  No references I can find, though...--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was likely unorganized territory, as Kansas was for 33 years after Missouri Statehood dissolved the Missouri Territory. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Colorado territory after Kansas statehood

message: 76.102.31.185 (talk) 05:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indirectly. When Missouri became a state in 1821, the remainder of the Missouri Territory effectively became politically unorganized. This included the region that was organized as the Kansas and Nebraska territories in 1854. older ≠ wiser 12:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorta, from June 4, 1812 until August 10, 1821 the area that would become Kansas Territory 33 years later was part of the Missouri Territory. When Missouri was granted statehood in 1821 the area became unorganized territory. I added a section to address this with some solid academic level sources. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Missouri Territory the parent territory?
Talk:Andreas Münzer

message: * I think the page name should be Andreas Münzer. We should use German alphabet. 61.230.83.109 (talk) 05:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the page name 
Talk:Human rights in Lebanon

message: This page appeared in the last few hours and could be seen as part of a campaign to justify Israeli agression towards Lebanon in recent weeks.  Compare with the section Human Rights in Israel which is sketchy at best about abuses against Palestinian people by the Israeli state. As a result I've added a NPOV flag. -- Gramscis cousin 08:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created this page because it was missing. Please notice that since the page only includes the bare information about Human rights in Lebanon, I marked it as a stub, so that other people can add to it. I'm not an Israeli Nationalist and I'm not trying to justify nothing. Instead of NPOV-bashing, you can look up the issue of Human rights in Lebanon and add substantial content to the article. I also think that Human Rights in Israel needs more development, but these two articles are not related in any way. --Gabi S. 08:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Nonsense. Wikipedia is full of criticism on everything, Israel included. The only thing that must be observed is the neutrality, so both sides of each argument must be presented. See NPOV guidelines for detailed examples. --Gabi S. 06:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

message: How the hell do you know every trace of positive portrayal of Jews is banned? Who cares if Fran Drescher is Jewish or that Jane Fonda once visited Israel? That is not relevant to the article. Get some things straight.
1. Not all Lebanese people are Muslims. There are plenty of Christians who still live in Lebanon and other parts of the Arab world.
2. Not all Lebanese Muslims hate Jews.
3. This page was obviously written by someone who is Jewish. I feel that on Wikipedia, Israel and Jews seem to be immune to criticism. Nobody is immune to criticism.
4. Please, isn't there enough Arab-bashing on Wikipedia?
I really think this needs an NPOV flag. Really. This article is a lie and mean-spirited. - Anonymous, 16 July 2009
: Above section seems irrelevant/OT discussion.  Will remove after 3 months if there is no dispute.  KenThomas (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Racism and irrelevance

message: Well, Censorship in Lebanon redirects to this article. Anyway, how would anyone use this report in English from L'Orient-Le Jour to expand on the country's film censorship system? JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 10:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film censorship
Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Review Team

message: I'll consider it later, but I'd like feedback from those who are already part of this team, and how they feel the process works.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, thanks for dropping by!  I'm doing a lot of the reviewing at the moment, though some others help out when they can.  We are aiming for another release during 2008 containing aroung 30,000 articles.  Things are going fairly slowly right now, because we're all waiting for the big new change to happen.  Our plan is (in effect) to use the WikiProjects to do a lot of the review and selection process for us (using this information), and to use a bot to pull the articles out from those lists.  Right now we're evaluating the output from a Selection Bot.  We'd really appreciate your opinions of the rankings and formulas given, especially in subjects that you know well.  Once we're happy with the output, we can get the bot to pick out the most important 20-30,000 publishable articles for us.  Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 03:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I might be interested in signing up here
Talk:Autumn (Dutch band)

message: Autumn is a notable band, as it meets the following criteria of WP:MUSIC:
* Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] reported in notable and verifiable sources.  (nl)
* Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable). 
* Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable http://www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=6366]
Bryan 08:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: uncontroversial move. Reverting old move; old articles Autumn (Russian band) and Autumn (American band) have been deleted, no ambiguity left. --  JHunterJ (talk) 19:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A band in Australia named Autumn had major success with a cover of "Yellow River" and the song was even covered by another group called Jigsaw at the same time, in the sixties, so they both got to number one concurrently. This was like when a band in Holland called The Dukes did a cover of a hit by The Easybeats, who are also Australian, but it also topped the Dutch charts.PeterMan844 (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:View of Delft

message: This is an excellent model for Wikipedia articles on paintings. I'm surprised it hasn't been attacked as "original research" by one of our many editors who provide plot summaries for novels in lieu of analysis. --Wetman 08:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: See User_talk:Moonriddengirl/Archive_48#View_of_Delft_.28Vermeer.29. Unfortunately I cannot see the deleted file, so I cannot re-add the comments I made prior to deletion. This is a problem when copyvios are removed without notifying the contributors beforehand. Jane (talk) 08:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This page was previously deleted

message: There isn't indication that the painting is of Delft as it looked from the south, besides that it is the artist's hometown. Additional information on the content of the painting, in terms of the objects and structures present, how they are represented compared to maps and documents indicating how they actually were would be beneficial. 
The Painting materials section could also be expanded when considering Vermeer's technique. Rhein o (talk) 23:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critique of the article on View of Delft 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Vermeer-view-of-delft.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 7, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-08-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Vermeer-view-of-delft.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nmkeith (talk) 04:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Baroque Art
Talk:Board of Chamberlains

message: 勝手に俺様ごときがこんな大切な記事を書いていいんだろうか？俺暗殺されないよね？側近＝メイドでいいのか？かなりの勢いで萌えを具現化中。集え！陛下たん愛好家。
Could I write such a important page without permission.Am not I assassinated?.I am emboding "MOE" at the risk of my life.Come on fun of "HEIKA TAN".--Forestfarmer 08:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Virtual reality in telerehabilitation

message: ::Crossposted from Template talk:Did you know
The article seems very wordy, it's hard to understand unless you have a deep understanding of telrehabilliation or virtual reality. Highway Return to Oz... 08:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: I've added a cleanup tag because this article, though well-referenced, desparately needs to be organized into paragraphs and converted to plain-English prose. Lovelac7 00:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that Wikipedia:Explain jargon, Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible and Wikipedia:Technical terms and definitions are most relevant?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  00:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Tag

message: New user has added the following text, unwikified, after references. Perhaps sb more familar with the field can move it to a proper place in the article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possibly useful
Talk:Sheet Music (10cc album)

message: Martinevans123
"10cc - The Complete UK Recordings,"
http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=12450
https://www.varesesarabande.com/products/complete-uk-recordings
http://www.allmusic.com/album/the-complete-uk-recordings-1972-1974-mw0000328696/releases  albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally  Known as 
Which ref do you like best? Al Gordon 22:09, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Martinevans123 If not in lead, then where?
Talk:Sport in Western Australia

message: The information on this page needs to be culled into one article currently its two messy sections from respective articles Gnangarra 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What no "Sport in Australia" covering category?  Does that mean...a portal but not cat ?SatuSuro 10:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: I recommend that this article is cleaned up for grammar, spelling errors and outdated information. I've seen a few errors, and it would be nice if the article was more tidy.
Thank you, FriendlyBacon (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Required / September 2022
Talk:Thiodina

message: This genus has been significantly reinterpreted. It has been split into 3 genera: Thiodina, Colonus, and Nilakantha. See http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2015/f/z04012p190f.pdf. Kaldari (talk) 04:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus reinterpreted