Talk:Byron Moreno

message: "Once his official picture was found on the Internet, with his characteristic sleepy eyes, he was victim of an intensive and humorous (but at times also hateful) campaign of defacing. [1]"
What's the point of this? I'm pretty sure that encyclopedias should not contain blatantly obvious insults to people. I'm removing this.
--Jayohz 17:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatantly obvious flame 

message: Oh for heaven's sake, after fully reading this article, it truly reeks of bitterness of Italian fans. I couldn't give a damn whether or not South Korea deserved that win or Italy deserved that loss but let's not bring that ugly crap into our beloved wikis. 
I'll leave the "alleged" business there but I do believe you require a citation. It's funny how whoever wrote the "blatantly obvious flame paragraph" (see above) had that cited but didn't cite the following section. Lovely.--Jayohz 18:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Am finding sources -- citations are very much available. --TheProject 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, the amount of references used is unbelieveable. Excellent work.--Jayohz 16:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: Oh for heaven's sake, after fully reading this article, it truly reeks of bitterness of Italian fans. I couldn't give a damn whether or not South Korea deserved that win or Italy deserved that loss but let's not bring that ugly crap into our beloved wikis. 
I'll leave the "alleged" business there but I do believe you require a citation. It's funny how whoever wrote the "blatantly obvious flame paragraph" (see above) had that cited but didn't cite the following section. Lovely.--Jayohz 18:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Am finding sources -- citations are very much available. --TheProject 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, the amount of references used is unbelieveable. Excellent work.--Jayohz 16:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: User:Melonbarmonster2 has reverted other users' edits 9 times in the main article on July 3, without any discussion in this talk page. I politely warn that this is a violation of the 3RR rule. Hkwon (talk) 05:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what 3rr is but you might want to try reading WP:3rr before you start accusing people of violating it.Melonbarmonster2 (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Melonbarmonster2]]'s violation of [[3RR]] rule 

message: The guy totally destroyed Italy at 2002. I believe he fixed the match, given the scandals after the World Cup. And I am from Greece, not Italy. --Rigas Papadopoulos • Talk to me • My work • 12:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destroyer 

message: By my edits I was hoping to change the way the article was written because I think it has some subliminal messages. For instance, I was attempting to edit how the offside is described, because many people agree it wasn’t offside (and by reviewing the game it can be made clear that it probably wasn’t offside), whilst that article bit makes it look like it was offside . So I wanted to add a part that said that it probably wasn’t. Same for the dive, since there was evident contact. Lastly, I also wanted to report the fact about the fouls by the South Korean team.IdkImNotCreative (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Who are many people? You need to provide WP:reliable sources and keep WP:NPOV. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus