lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Audiograbber

message: * Awards
* 663,000 results in Google
Reviews:
* http://www.sonicspot.com/audiograbber/audiograbber.html
* http://comnet.pt.lu/desc/audiograbber.html
I think that's enough, it's clearly notable. --DStoykov 21:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Since Feb 9th, 2004 Audiograbber is Freeware!  The last version, v1.8.3, does not impose any restrictions when ripping as the main article suggests 90.208.233.213 (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeware 

message: I know what you mean, but seriously, but a dictionary. 94.27.243.47 (talk) 08:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Proprietary freeware" is a contradiction in terms 

message: The website (English) is closed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.144.214 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 5 January 2010
:website (English) is open.--1archie99 (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website 

message: The last paragraph in this page, that reads as follows, is completely inappropriate within an encyclopedic entry:
"Version 1.83 (as well as the convenient Lame plugin installer on the same site) from the developer site comes bundled with several adware and malware, like Funmoods Toolbar, Conduit Search, Zapp, VO Package, Browser Utility, AnyProtect and even though you are offered to tick these off before installing, they are installed anyway, so a big warning there. What you really download on the site is not the actual AudioGrabber but a separate installer that can change its behavior. You do get a functional AudioGrabber at the end, but a lot of extra's you do not care for and did not ask for."
178.135.145.212 (talk) 21:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous paragraph! 
Talk:1999 Austrian Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com Bobby Doorknobs 21:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Barbara Daly Baekeland

message: I understand Wikipedia's politics of not making a page for criminals, but name it "Boston Marathon Attack" for example, with a subcategory named "perpetrator" for the criminal. Now, only two Baekelands have a page, Leo : he's the inventor of bakelite. And Barbara. Who is famous for...? Being a socialite? A victim? I have read the Robbins/Aronson investigative book, several testimonies, including her own, confirm she raped her son. This page in the current state looks too much as a tribute for a rapist.--84.97.206.19 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: The claims of incest are unproved to the full extent of 'fact' and should be described as 'alleged by some', at best.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.7.127 (talk) 12:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the article you linked to was derived from the Wikipedia article not the other way around.--209.7.195.158 (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The location of the marriage of Brooks Middleton Baekeland and Barbara Daly is cited on page 132 of "Savage Grace" as being Bennettsville, S.C., and not California, as stated in the Wikipedia article. 96.245.65.216 (talk) 19:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbara Daly Baekeland
Talk:Pepijn Aardewijn

message: Yellow.
78.147.24.167 (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gardarike runestones

message: Magnus Källström article http://fornvannen.se/pdf/2000talet/2008_233.pdf "En tidigare okänd österledsfarare
från Rasbo: Till tolkningen av inskriften på Frötunastenen U 1003" (2009) notes recently identified drawing of U 1003 (before it was damaged) indicates it is a memorial to a man who died in Novgorod; needs someone who can accurately translate / summarize it and update this article. Deanlaw (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: U 1003

message: The paragraph isn't balanced. It gives undue weight and detailed presentation of what is a minority point of view, namely Pritsak's. It states that the first mention of Wallachians is Choniates - this is interpretation, not fact. According to the mainstream interpretation G 134 itself is the first mention of Vlachs. Furthermore, the paragraph states that Blökkumannaland refers to Polovtsians although mainstream sources have linked it to the Balkan Vlachs since the 17th century translation of the Heimskringla onward. Plinul cel tanar (talk) 08:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: G 134
Talk:Bowers Fly Baby

message: As I understand it, Bowers suggested obtaining cheap thin plywood (such as is seen on shipping crates), but selecting it by shining a flashlight through (3 plys) to find voids and knots in the central ply and not including any such flaws in the product. I think I read this in one of the popular magazines (Popular Science, Popular Mechanix) at the time. - Leonard G. (talk) 03:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plywood selection
Talk:1999 German Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 21:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Cure (Fantastic Four)

message: Who was that guy in the orange jumpsuit? Some people say it's USAgent, but I'm not entrely sure.
:I can see where they're going; guy with no powers and a crash helmet with stars on it, but I don't think USAgent ever wore orange. Given the other characters appearing, I'd check really obscure teams, especially GLA. Daibhid C 09:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audition
Talk:Xiao Mausoleum

message: The coordinates are somewhere near Shenyang. Avihu (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, no response. Hint, check the coordinates in the Hebrew version. Avihu (talk) 18:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong coordinates 
Talk:109th (Aberdeenshire) Regiment of Foot

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.leinster-regiment-association.org.uk/history/18th/109th.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Lozleader (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pied stilt

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Himantopus himantopus leucocephalus - Lake Joondalup.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 14, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-06-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Himantopus himantopus leucocephalus - Lake Joondalup.jpg]]

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Himantopus leucocephalus - Hexham.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on May 10, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-05-10. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Himantopus leucocephalus - Hexham.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Known as the pied stilt in New Zealand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.186.193 (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:1999 Hungarian Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Write a good lead section.
*Add photographs to the article.
Results
*Add race results.  Added. BillCook 06:05, 1 November 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Zhao Mausoleum (Qing dynasty)

message: As of 27 October 2012, the picture of the gate with the two lions and three archways is the main gate to Beiling Park, not the gate to the Zhao Mausoleum (Qing Dynasty). I am in the process of uploading the correct picture. Geraldshields11 (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the gate to the park is the gate to the original grounds of the mausoleum. The entire park was the mausoleum area. Today there is a separate ticket required to enter the central section of the mausoleum but that is a full kilometre within the the grounds. This is all explained in the article. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Hook and ladder (chess)

message: I'm prodding this because it is distinctly nonstandard terminology.  As far as I know, it has been proposed by only a single chess writer.  At this point, it's a neologism.  Wikipedia must wait to see if this terminology catches on before reporting on it. On the other hand, this material would make an excellent addition to sacrifice (chess) if changed to use the standard deflection sacrifice terminology.  I don't think that article covers deflection sacrifices at all.  Quale 20:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I haven't heard of it before, and it is not in the Oxford Companion or Golombek's encyclopedia.  Merge it into Sacrifice.  Bubba73 (talk), 21:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree. David aukerman talk 02:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that the term is not in enough widespread use to merit a separate article, but that much of the article is salvagable and usable. I have merged and redirected the majority of the article in with sacrifice (chess). Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonstandard terminology
Talk:The Anna Nicole Smith Story

message: Can you actually say that and not mangle the language?
Duggy 1138 23:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "As unexpected by some,"
Talk:The Retreat

message: According to list of Quakers, the Retreat was co-founded by Henry and William Tuke. Henry is not mentioned here. Which article is correct?--Shantavira|feed me 16:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Henry? 
Talk:Fog bow

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:360 degrees fogbow.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 25, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-02-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 18:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:360 degrees fogbow.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:World Chess Championship 1993

message: I've got a book on the Kasparov/Short match (the one by Danny King and Donald Trelford) which is fairly comprehensive so when I get a chance i'll have a go at expanding the article. Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding

message: I think it would be better to split the article and present the two championships in separate articles. SteMicha (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The trouble with a split is that both the the Candidates tournament and the politics would both need to be duplicated if we split the article. It's really one story, not two. I think it's better to not split. Peter Ballard (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Though I guess we could keep this article (with the Candidates and the politics), and split off FIDE World Chess Championship 1993 and PCA World Chess Championship 1993 if and when there's enough material on the matches to warrant separate articles for them. But we're not at that stage yet, or even close to it, IMHO. Peter Ballard (talk) 12:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, the article should be written in the first place. Conscious (talk) 09:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Article
Talk:Blood Law

message: Blood law seems a perjorative term for a form of what English and European common law called "outlawing." PhilLiberty 22:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outlawing 

message: Blood law can also refer to membership in a clan or tribe. Or is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.2.125.199 (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law of the blood 
Talk:1999 Belgian Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 23:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:British Centre for Science Education

message: Can anyone speak to the question of whether the BCSE wiki is WP:R?  The quesiton has come up at the AFD of a theologian they criticize, Jonathan Stephen.I.Casaubon (talk) 22:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikis are never WP:RS. Due to its small size, volunteer nature and recent (2006) creation, even non-wiki BCSE pages would probably count as, at best, WP:SPSs. But the best place to get a wider opinion on this would probably be WP:RSN (this page has relatively few watchers). HrafnTalkStalk(P) 01:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: BCSE wiki

message: This seems pretty trivial - a creationist minister sets up a website to attack BCSE doesn't belong here. Dougweller (talk) 13:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  BCSE revealed 
Talk:Beihai Park

message: Taihu Lake is in Jiangsu ~, not in Henan Province, like stated in the article. Either Taihu Lake or Henan as source of the stones is wrong. T6nis (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Something's wrong

message: It ain't. There are sources who call it that and we need to acknowledge them, but it's better to call it a dagoba (a) since Star Wars and (b) to distinguish that this is a particularly Tibetan form of stupa and has nothing to do with pagodas as generally understood and discussed. — LlywelynII 08:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: "Pagoda"

message: I added a bit on the importance to Qing and modern Yangzhou. The provided source only mentions the Qianlong tour but the copy of the dagoba actually preceded him and had been raised for the Kangxi Emperor. It doesn't have an article yet, though, so add a new source for that point as needed but don't blank the content based on the current source. — LlywelynII 08:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Yangzhou

message: are pretty important details for a place like this. Previously, the infobox and running text disagreed with each other. Kindly source the area of the park (69 or 71 ha) and doublecheck that 11th century and 1150 are incorrect dates and construction actually began c. 1179 as currently cited. — LlywelynII 09:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Size and age
Talk:1961 in Canada

message: *August 3 - Tommy Douglas is elected leader of the newly formed New Democratic Party 
*December 28 - Canada's first BOMARC Missile squadron is formed. The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation becomes the New Democratic Party 
CCF became NDP on 12.28, so how can Tommy Douglas become the leader of NDP on 8.3? Jackzhp 22:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: something wrong here
Talk:1999 Italian Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 22:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Teesville

message: I'm not sure where they're up to with the status of this amalgamation. But in any case - this paragraph needs updating. Francis Hannaway (talk) 18:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teesville /Ravensworth School 
Talk:Amsterdam Bijlmer ArenA station

message: Do not post over the name.--Tahrim
:What do you mean?--Patrick 07:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he means that it's not correct to say that the station is named for Amsterdam ArenA. Like this. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see, thanks. Yes, his claim that it is not proven surprised me.--Patrick 14:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, i will say that. Patrick: ben jij niet de Nederlandse Patrick? Tahrim 19:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I am :nl:User:Patrick.--Patrick 23:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, ok. Tahrim 11:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:1999 Japanese Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary. Available source(s): Grand Prix Racing.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 18:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Umgah

message: I recall the Thraddish saying something to the effect of being the first race to join the Ur Quan in this section of the Galaxy... which would mean the Umgah were not first... despite the fact that the Thraddish were not featured in the first game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.173.174.168 (talk) 02:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First race to fall to the Ur Quan?
Talk:Kodak Tri-X

message: So I while I'm not going to argue that "Tri-X 400 is usually rated at ISO 400 when processed in standard developers" (presumably D76, but I'm a Fujifilm guy myself), I don't quite get the "and remains among the fastest black and white films today" bit. Fuji Presto, Kodak's C-41 process BW400CN, and various others are all 400 as well. However Fuji's Super Presto (ISO 1600) and Kodak's T-MAX 3200 are two and three stops faster, respectively, using their recommended processing.
In short: ISO 400 was fast in 1970. It isn't in the 2000s. So I'm deleting that phrase. However, if you can make a good argument for it (or want to qualify it), go ahead and do so, with a comment here explaining my misunderstanding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.249.238.158 (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No argument here. Reub2000 (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

message: The article states "Since the advent of digital photography, Tri-X has all but fallen out of use in newspaper journalism, though it remains popular in documentary journalism." I Of-course this is unsourced. I am not familiar with documentary journalism and instead suggest documentary photography, where I believe Tri-X still has its enthusiasts, though perhaps not enough to warrant claiming it "remains popular". Jc3s5h disagreed, saying ""Documentary journalism" may not be a great phrase, but I have an idea of what it means. The sort of thing you would find in a monthly magazine. "Documentary photography" is not a phrase I'm familiar with; it could mean almost anything other than art and fiction.". Fortunately we have an encyclopedia to hand, which has an article on Documentary photography. I would still like to replace documentary journalism and documentary photography, if not update this sentence more thoroughly if there are sources with which to do so. -Lopifalko (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Documentary photography has sources, but unfortunately, the relevant on-line source doesn't work and I do not have the off-line sources. I note that this on-line article seems to include news under the umbrella of documentary photography. I also think it's highly questionable that Tri-X still has widespread application in this field (if we can even figure out what "documentary photography" is). Jc3s5h (talk) 19:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  documentary journalism and documentary photography
Talk:Mi Lu Bing

message: I felt that the appearance of this band does not contributed greatly to singapore music industry and etc...So gave low importance.--Quek157 10:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that high importance was not to be used in this type of cases, they should change the whole band movement or at least part of it to be sufficiently high, i felt that mid importance was okay in this sense, note that i am neutral to Mi lu bing--Quek157 13:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liaobei

message: At present the article does not make much sense when discussing the 'de jure' and 'de facto' capitals, since both are under PRC jurisdiction and have been since the establishment of the PRC in 1949. Before then, the communists controlled parts of the region. For example, the "Liaobei First Special Administration Huinan (遼北一專署輝南)" was established in part of Liaobei in February 1946, with the capital of Chaoyang Town (朝陽鎮) with subsidiary local governments in Huinan (輝南) (Huinan town and Chaoyang Town are both in modern Huinan County in Tonghua prefecture), Hailong (海竜, later written 海龍), Dongfeng County (東豐), Panshi (磐石) in Jilin City, Shanchengzhen (山城鎮) and Yitong County (伊通縣, now Yitong Manchu Autonomous County). The nearby city of Liaoyuan was fiercely contested until the communists finally took the city in 1947. The first commissioner of the area was Wei Zhenwu (魏震五). At present I do not have primary sources for this information and so I haven't edited the article. WestNab (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liaobei Province
Talk:Suiyuan

message: Suiyuan Province was reconstituted by the communist authorities on June 15th 1949. Before this date the area was controlled by the communists and called Sui-Meng, since it contained the old Republican Province of Suiyuan and parts of what was called Mengkiang (modern spelling Mengjiang), when it was controlled by the Japanese. It seems likely that Sui-Meng was controlled by the communists continuously from the end of the war with Japan, but I don't have confirmation of that. (Reference: CIA document CIA-RDP80-00809A000600240360-5.pdf, Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2011/07/07, available online at https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80-00809A000600240360-5.pdf). WestNab (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sui-Meng