Talk:Mobile number portability

message: The additions of Aleksmayer seem to be a copyright infringement, although I have not yet located an online source. The lengthy text is cited as "Extract from Logica CMG’s Operator Manual". I will remove the text until it can be proven free, and then its content should be merged in and not merly copied. jnothman talk 07:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected Copyright infringement 

message: can someone add this? --76.8.67.2 (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States 

message: Pakistan is not in the "Middle East & Africa" region of the world, by far. Middle East ends at Iraq!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.50.73 (talk) 06:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pakistan 

message: The first paragraph (which says basically that Donor-led porting is bad and
Recipient-led is good) looks POV to me. Perhaps Recipient-led is better (I
wouldn't know), but the wording could be more neutral, or citations could
be provided to prove the point that Recipient-led is better. What about the point
that Recipient-led porting could lead to unscrupulous providers switching
numbers to their network without the customer's consent ("slamming")?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.182.134 (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole Technical details section is too UK-centric. If the UK uses a different method from the rest of the world (does it? Did it change in 2009, or not?) then the global standard should be described and the UK differences outlined in a separate subsection. Citations are needed, too. 81.136.202.93 (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "United Kingdom and India are the only exceptions" certainly doesn't seem quite correct – Germany doesn't use a Porting Authorisation Code, but you definitely still need to contact your current provider first in order to release your number for porting. JanTH (talk) 17:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK / Doner-led porting 

message: Does anyone know the law around porting a number when
-you leave a company
-you are made redundant
-you have had the phone number for a set period of time
-you have had to pay for any private calls  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.91.171 (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal rights when you want to port a number when leaving a company, or made redundant 

message: If the service provider suddenly goes out of business, ceases to function -- is there any way to port out the trapped phone number?-71.174.188.32 (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  provider unavailable 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mobile number portability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160107102222/http://www.siget.gob.sv/index.php/novedades/noticias/1-noticias-ciudadano/2507-la-portabilidad-numerica-una-historia-de-exito-otro-compromiso-cumplido to http://www.siget.gob.sv/index.php/novedades/noticias/1-noticias-ciudadano/2507-la-portabilidad-numerica-una-historia-de-exito-otro-compromiso-cumplido
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060810043015/http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/944.pdf to http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/944.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517153227/http://www.portare.md/en/pages/porting%20procedure%20for%20mobile%20numbers to http://www.portare.md/en/pages/porting%20procedure%20for%20mobile%20numbers
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)