lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iran–Palestinian relations

message: Someone rated the article as GA class and as being very important.  It is neither at the moment.  I am going to rate it as "Start" class and importance "Mid" which I think is roughly accurate.  --Abnn 20:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I find it totally inappropriate someone would do that.
WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT ISRAEL SHIPPED ARMS TO IRAN DURING IRAN-IRAQ WAR? THIS IS A MYTH THAT HAS BEEN ON WIKIPEDIA RELATED TOPICS, EITHER SOURCE OR REMOVE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ditc (talk • contribs) 05:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a GA class article nor it is that important

message: The first footnote refers to a statement by the former President of Iran.  That's his idea of what might happen rather than an official policy.  I think it should be removed and the second foot note stay.
Labellesanslebete (talk) 16:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Iran's offer to accept a two-state solution

message: However Iran is not the official name of Iran.  Hcobb (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The official name of the entity
Talk:Cobra Mission: Panic in Cobra City

message: I removed all references to Ainos as developer. This myth stems, I think, from the Anime FAQ and is most likely false. In the English version, there is no company logo except Megatech's, for the graphics, an Inos Team is credited, the similarity of Inos and Ainos most likely gave rise to this myth.—Graf Bobby (talk) 11:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ainos 
Talk:Icel of Mercia

message: Pronounciation hints, please!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.157.48.48 (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is a complete shambles. Please can I have license to remove all reference to Icel as a king and restore to factual sources about this legendary king? Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 18:04, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks dab, I appreciate your advice and will give that some thought. Again I agree entirely with your ideas and am trying to accommodate Mergism more lately. The genealogies need some correction and expansion first however, taking into account your point about "Woden-centricism", and my point on the talk page of Wihtlaeg about the standard practice or "mere formality" of discarding the legendary heads of the genealogies to provide better explanation and comparison. I am being a bit wary of making any changes to them myself lately after some heated debates recently. But would appreciate any advice. Thanks again for all your help. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 22:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up operation needed
Talk:Jacob of Serugh

message: There are two pages about this same person. We have Jacob of Serugh and Jacob of Saruq. Which one should be merged to which one? Michaelovic (talk) 16:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I now think Jacob of Serugh should be the correct spelling. But does nobody have a opinion about this? Michaelovic (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: .--Rafy talk 21:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: I agree it should be merged. Add any differences from the small one into the larger one and then delete the small one. I don't have the time to do this, but I will be happy to proofread it once it's been merged.
Yo
YoMenashe (talk) 22:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  proceed with merge 

message: I don't have access to the Roman Martyrology, so I cannot dispute the claim that Jacob is a saint in the Roman Catholic Church. But if he is, then it seems likely that he is also a saint in some of the Orthodox churches. Yet, as the article mentions, he had reservations about Chalcedon, which would make his acceptance as a saint doubtful in any Chalcedon church (including Roman Catholic). Does anyone have any good information about this? TomS TDotO (talk) 12:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint
Talk:Everybody (The Sea and Cake album)

message: I added a whole bunch, and thought it appropriate to remove the stub tab. Julian Maestas 22:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article needs a credits section to avoid being a stub, see WP:ALBUMA#Quality scale. --PEJL 19:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a credits section. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 21:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the meantime the guideline changed to recommend that the section be called "Personnel" (see WP:ALBUM#Personnel) so I renamed it to that. --PEJL 22:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed stub 

message: I have the iTunes version of the album and it does not state the length (play-time) of this album. If someone has the CD, please insert the length of the album into the infobox. Thank you. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 15:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Length of album
Talk:Ariobarzanes of Persis

message: This article should be moved to "Ariobarzanes", unarguably the most popular name. If no-one responds I'll just proceed with the move. Miskin 11:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rename

message: As you can see it on Livius pages, there are two Ariobarzanes:
:(1) Satrap of Phrygia
:(2) Satrap of Persis
In this article, you put origins of (1) and life of (2), which makes no sense. 
When I edited Croatian Wiki articles I've noticed differences, so you can find it here: (1) and (2). Good luck boys. --93.143.2.52 (talk) 17:58, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to get confused, there is also a third Ariobarzan from roughly the same period: English article and Croatian one. --93.143.2.52 (talk) 18:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Family" belongs to OTHER Ariobarzan 

message: What is the source of "30 days" reference in "The Persian success at the Battle of the Persian Gate was short lived though; after being held off for 30 days, Alexander the Great outflanked and destroyed the defenders." I've never seen it in print, only on the net...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.76.117.70 (talk) 02:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 days 
Talk:Three-dimensional virtual tourism

message: 3DVT is a suggested addition to the general discussion of virtual tours and tourism.  Perhaps it should be merged into virtual tours, as a line application.  However, a popular view of a "virtual tour" comes from experiences with hotel registration and on-line real estate advertisements.  Interactive mapping technologies now bring the the possbility of adding actual 3D models into this mix, without deleting the former.  Obviously, university research has already explored this usage as well, but not too much has appeared in the public domain.  This listing is a first attempt to nail down some definitions before a popular wave of 3DVT applications from the likes of Google Earth begin to appear en masse.   Further suggestions are welcome.  Johnson250 20:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Justification

message: So could the scope of this article be expanded to tours of user-created maps for (multiplayer) games (with map editors) like Far Cry 2?
I used to join up games to tour such maps with the creator of the map as a guide instead of the usual deathmatch...there are some really great works out there which are getting no recognition whatsoever beyond the "just some map to play in"-thinking.
And if not do you know if there's an article for that? And if there isn't would you help with creating it?
--Fixuture (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virtual tourism for user-created maps?
Talk:For the Sick

message: Why does this article show up at the top of the statistics for most viewed Wikipedia articles? __meco (talk) 10:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Best I can tell pageview spam.©Geni 14:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you tell what that means? __meco (talk) 23:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Basicly someone uses bots to generate a lot of page hits for one reason or another.©Geni 14:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia's most popular article?
Talk:Fun Club (Alexia album)

message: May as well get rid of this page as everything is duplicated in Fan Club (Alexia album). Fun Club was the title of the amiercan release only.
In fact I will redirect and just add an image of fun club to the fan club page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.105.236 (talk) 16:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steinbach (store)

message: This article is kind of cluttered and rambling. Mostly it needs grammar fixes. TenPoundHammer 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we fixed 'er up.  What do you think?  SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I want to say that there was one of these stores in Riverside Mall in Utica, NY back in the 1980's through the early 1990's.
Can anyone else confirm this? 72.237.4.150 (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Anastasius Sinaita

message: Premature FAC archived at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anastasius Sinaita/archive1.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAC withdrawn 

message: Just as well, as a lot has been copied from Amazon and from , a paper published by Sage . I've deleted most of it, but it looks as though some of his references are in fact from the paper, even if reworded, and suggest  didn't read the originals. Dougweller (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:Anna of East Anglia

message: The article says she's first mentioned in the late 10th century, but then says she's mentioned in the ASC in 798.  From a quick look in Swanton it appears she's only mentioned in F, which as I recall is quite late, so maybe that's the confusion -- it's a 10C ms recording a 798 event.  If that's the case, I think this should be clearer in the text. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 22:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - sorted. Hel-hama (talk) 18:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wihtburh 

message: "It is a candidate for a monastic site" - I thought Blythburgh Priory was firmly established? Where is the uncernity? 47.71.37.233 (talk) 11:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no direct evidence of a site during the Anglo-Saxon period, only later during the Middle Ages.  Amitchell125 (talk) 14:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Priory
Talk:Anund

message: See discussion here. SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If they exist. But Woodzing is making up names that are not attested for these persons. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 06:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

text: I remain of the opinion that Anwynd should not be given as an alternative name here. Haukur (talk) 08:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Exonym]] ''Anwynd''
Talk:Princess Wencheng

message: 1) Accdording to the wikipedia entry cited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emperor_Taizong%27s_campaign_against_Tufan
Songtsan Gambo was defeated by Tang. 
2) Also, according to this cite from Professor Yuan:
http://www.wku.edu/~yuanh/China/tales/princesswencheng_b.htm
The marriage was not by force, but Gambo's admiration for Emperor Taizong of Tang.
Bobby fletcher (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about the citations of Tufan militay threat 

message: , would you like to discuss what you find problematic about this page? You have been engaged in an edit war and I even warned you about it on your talk page. Please discuss your issues here so we can resolve them. Ogress smash! 22:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: According to the article, Songtsen Gampo fell in love with the princess in 634. Did he really fall in love with a six year old girl?Bill (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Falling in love

message: This article is a mess as a result of repeated edits to neutralize contentious claims from mysterious historical Chinese sources through added expressions of doubt. Adding "allegedly" and "possibly" to the wide assortment of unsupported claims does not add balance, it is just confusing and misleading. These claims need to be verified in a more diverse range of sources, or removed if they cannot be verified. I'll get the ball rolling:
: Chinese sources credit Princess Wencheng for introducing Tibet with other skills in metallurgy, farming, weaving, construction, manufacturing of paper and ink as well as developing the Tibetan alphabet and writing system.
:: Linguistically, there is no reason to believe this. Tibetan script is a Northern Brahmic abugida, and is nothing like written Chinese. I've gone ahead and removed this claim, since it adds nothing to our understanding of the article's subject. I was able to find more information about the claims concerning paper and ink manufacturing, and have included it with source.
More broadly, I'm also scrubbing the article of references to "bringing civilization" and use of contentious adjectives like "barbaric" to describe Tibetans prior to her arrival. These terms are deeply colonialist and have no place in neutral writing.69.157.63.58 (talk) 22:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disproportionate space given to unnamed historical Chinese sources 

message: I will add some details about the princess' personal information (e.g., family), influence (e.g., the tea culture, sport: polo) and legacy (e.g., Jokhan Temple), as the page is currently lacking information on these areas. And I would like to open four new parts about the route to Tibet, the legend and the Princess Wencheng in chinese literature for this article. I will try my best to do it well, thanks!Helina99880 (talk) 23:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit the page
Talk:Baithéne mac Brénaind

message: cleared banners on making this stub a redirect. Notuncurious (talk) 20:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: With the recent back and forth, the subject of this article is now categorised among both "Irish Christian monks" and "6th-century Irish abbots" (a subset of "Irish abbots", itself a subset of "Irish Christian monks"). Is the categorisation tree inexact (have there been abbots who were not monks?) or is "monk" redundant when he's already categorised as "abbot", a subcategory of "monk"? It's quite possible that the category tree is inexact. Irish Roman Catholic abbesses is also a subset of "Irish abbots", even though as far as I'm aware none of the abbesses listed ever was an abbot.--Andreas Philopater (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation query
Talk:Cerf theory

message: Is the theorem that you attribute to Cerf, actually due to Thom and Mather,
as explained in the book by Martinet? My understanding is that what is sometimes
called "Cerf theory" (any two handle decompositions are related by critical point
cancellation, order changes, and handle slides) is due to Thom-Mather (any
generic family of functions is generically Morse and has 
only birth-death singularities at a finite set of times),
Cerf (in a generic family of Morse functions, all critical values are generically
distinct but at a finite set of times critical values may cross) and Kirby (in a 
generic family of Morse functions, all functions are Morse-Smale except for a finite
set giving rise to the handle slides).  One should point out that only the
first Thom-Mather contribution is really non-trivial. 
Woodwardc 13:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not read the Martinet book so I can't comment on its specific contents.  But your statement that two handle decompositions are related by critical point cancellations, variations on that can be attributed to Smale and Morse as well. Who deserves the original credit, I'm not certain but Morse was a major proponent of that idea for a long time. Anyhow, that is not the full content of Cerf's "theory".  Cerf theory says that any path in the function space that starts and ends at a Morse function can be approximated by one which fails to be Morse at only finitely many points, and those points correspond to birth/death points in the family.  So the theorem you quote is the special case of Cerf theory once you realize the space of all functions from M to the real numbers is contractible.   The theorem that Martinet talks about is all the Cerf theory you need to know for most low-dimensional topological arguments: kirby calculus, Cerf's proof that orientation preserving diffeomorphisms of S^3 are isotopic to the identity, etc.  But it's weaker than what the whole theory is about.  And it does not suffice for Rubinstein's proof of the generalized Smale conjecture for lens spaces, for example.  Sorting out attributions would be a good thing to do.  I should be able to sort the attribution mess soon.  I'm not in direct contact with Cerf but I do know his office-mate.  Rybu 20:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution 

message: I recently received a letter from someone who knows the Cerf theory history very well.  So I've updated the article taking into account his suggestions. Several references are improved, there's much more detail on the origins, and the generalizations section has much more scope. Still, there's quite a bit to do but the article is much more informative now. Rybu (talk) 09:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent updates
Talk:Soho Mint

message: Some of the material at History of the British penny (1714-1901) may be of use. Andy Mabbett 20:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the British penny 
Talk:American Academy of Political and Social Science

message: On 4 April 2007, new editor Ajvb made a number of edits to this article. See below.  Because some of the material is directly quoted from copyrighted material of the AAPSS, and because it is not in proper Wikipedia form, I have placed it here, so that it can be mined for proper edits (with citation where necessary) to the article. Portions, as they are added to the article, or found unnecessary, are deleted from the listing below--Bejnar 20:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All material fully mined. --Bejnar (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Non Wikipedia entry

message: Part of paragraph beginning "Over its history, Academy members ..." was removed as a copyright violation. --Bejnar 21:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: On 4 April 2007, new editor Ajvb added a list of fifty-nine (59) fellows of the academy. Because of the large number, and since none of them, apparently, have Wikipedia articles, I have omitted them from the article.  If you think that they should be included in the article, please say why. --Bejnar 21:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right, do not include these fellows of the academy. However, if there are fellows or officers of the academy who do have Wikipedia articles, they should be mentioned in the article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fellows of the Academy

message: These names were added as Academy members, however, the evidence suggests that instead they either were presenters or had papers published by the Academy. Certainly they should not have been inserted in the article between the names of two Academy members who were civil servants (gov. employees) and the footnote reference for that membership status.  In that same reference, these names were not identified as members. Names: Eleanor Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, W.E.B. DuBois, Margaret Mead, Thurgood Marshall, Mahatma Gandhi, Booker T. Washington. --Bejnar 23:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Presenters, not members ?
Talk:Chandrakirti

message: Regarding the quote "The emptiness of intrinsic reality of things is itself called by the wise “emptiness,” ...":
Not everything seems to be a (translated) quote of Chandrakirti. According to the source book only the part:
"The emptiness of intrinsic reality of things is itself called by the wise “emptiness,” and this emptiness also is considered to be empty of any intrinsic reality."
is quoted from him while this part:
"The emptiness of that which is called “emptiness” is accepted as “the emptiness of emptiness” (śūnyatāśūnyatā). It is explained in this way for the purpose of controverting objectification of the emptiness as intrinsically real." 
is a quote of the comment of Sonam Thakchoe. I don't know how to mark this quote in a quote correctly here. Please help. 2001:4091:A242:8012:190C:4E0:F55E:313 (talk) 05:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Su Xiaoxiao

message: What is the Chinese characters for Su Xiaojun?——Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 08:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Su Xiaoxiao also called Su Xiaojun?
Talk:Ceretic of Elmet

message: If the text calls him Certic why does this article call him Ceretic...? Paul S (talk) 18:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have I missed something here? Precisely which text calls him "Certic"? The Latin text of the Annales Cambriae spells his name as Ceretic; in Welsh tradition he is known as Ceredig (i.e. 'Ceretic'; soft mutation t=d, c=g). I've never seen him called Certic. Enaidmawr (talk) 22:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Sorry, having checked the Latin text of Nennius I see that 'he' has Certic; agree there could be a case for a) a 'typo' by the author of the Historia or b) they are in fact two seperate persons. Too late to go into that tonight. Most scholars seem to agree on the tentative identification of Ceretic/Certic with Ceredig ap Gwallog, however. For much of sub-Roman history the line between history and tradition is tenuous. Enaidmawr (talk) 23:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certic/Ceretic
Talk:Live It Up! (Holly Woods album)

message: This article reads like an advertisement. Any takers on the cleanup?
71.17.218.66 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 15:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?
Talk:Theodahad

message: what does his name mean? I know Theodoric means something like "blessed by god" but what does Theodahad mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.45.84 (talk) 23:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name means? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Canbechanged (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Middle Ages
Talk:Chlodulf of Metz

message: Is this page just wrong? St. Cloud is commonly taken to be Clodoald, the monkish survivor of the murder of King Chlodomer of Burgundy's children. In fact, the St. Cloud disambig page doesn't even have a link here. Is there general confusion as to which is meant? or just by the article writer? -114.91.67.180 (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Cloud

message: Also wrong? According to the Gertrude of Nivelles article, she didn't marry.  If this is correct, she is unlikely to be a sister-in-law (of anyone). Seems that Chlodulf of Metz's brother Ansegisel is said to have married Begga. sprocketonline (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gertrude of Nivelles
Talk:Theuderic I

message: I am concerned about that longwinded pretty French narration suppressing important research by reputable British authors. See in contrast a German article on Theuderic catalogued at the 'Deutsche National Bibliothek', source url http://www.badenhausen.net/rolf-badenhausen/Theuderich_I.pdf Geoffrey C. Hart  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.24.50 (talk) 10:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thierry Ier", French article
Talk:Clovis II

message: It is claimed Balthid has been given to Clovis by his master of the palace Ebroin. However, Ebroin only becaim master of the palace in 658 (according the article on Ebroin) whereas Clothar III, one of Clovis' and Balthid's sons, was born in 652, an apparent contradiction.
---
I am concerned about the photograph. The filename of the photograph suggests it is Theuderic and Martel. The caption says it is Clovis II and Martel.
Pyobon (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Weis et al, Ancestral Roots (2005), p 217, line 240A-8, asserts the dates of his life are 634-657 Sholom (talk) 23:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates