Talk:E. D. Hill

message: If memory serves, she was also known professionally as Edie Tarbox when serving as an anchor for WPXI in Pittsburgh. See: http://triblive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/tribpm/s_509315.html 198.208.251.23 (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Professional A/K/A

message: For those that continue to delete this from the article.
Hill, a Democrat, considers herself the most liberal of the FOX anchors. “On everything but national security, I tend to err on the side of freedom,” she explains. “I believe in freedom of speech, even if it means allowing hate speech.” Arzel (talk) 19:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a citation for this? Perhaps we should put this back in the article. Gamaliel (talk) 22:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: a quick check shows it comes from 'Interview with E.D. Hill.' which is in external links. although if i remember right, there were some sort of POV issues over it at one point. Perry mason (talk) 23:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

text: It sounds like she's trying to imply she's a liberal without providing a shred of concrete evidence. Being a "primary-voting Democrat" doesn't really prove anything. I have conservative friends who register as Democrat to vote in local primaries. The fact that she uses the word "primary" seems to hint at a lack of allegiance to the Democratic Party. (I could be misunderstanding her, as she might be using primary in the sense of "main" or "dominant," but her statement is at the very least ambiguous.) As for saying she "errs on the side of freedom," I have no idea what that's got to do with liberalism as conventionally defined; right-wing libertarians also advocate greater freedom, and since she makes an exception for "national security" issues, she could easily be a typical conservative. Since when was banning "hate speech" (however defined) a cornerstone of conservatism? marbeh raglaim (talk) 04:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're forgetting your place here. It is not for you to decide what is evidence and what is not. If the statement was said, then it was said. Wikipedia is not investigative journalism and you are not Bob Woodward. If she said she is liberal, then put it in there. This is no trial and she is no politician so it doesn't matter. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 07:13, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am a Democrat 

message: Sorry, I forgot to log in when I added the above comment, that was me. I also wanted to add links to the videos so you knew what I meant:
* Apology: http://youtube.com/watch?v=InahUzwRSH8
* Original: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_vmQrTi3aM&feature=related
Orblivion (talk) 16:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More details 

message: im not really sure on how all that works but i know its got something to do with this although im afraid i dont understand it.
basically, i was just wondering if it would be wise to semi-protect E.D's page from non-established users for a little while because of the whole 'terrorist fist jab' issue.
also, are references 4, 5, and 6 ok because they just link to wiki pages and i see no reference to E.D. anywhere. im afraid to edit them because i will probably end up getting banned.
Perry mason (talk) 22:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, WP:RFPP is the correct link. I agree semi-protection is a good idea, but it would be improper for me to do it since I'm involved in editing the article, so you'll have to put in a request at RFPP. References 4,5, and 6 are citations of television programs. The wikilinks are links to articles about the television programs and are not intended to be links to individual episodes. The relevant episodes are identified by airdate. Gamaliel (talk) 22:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: im sorry but i still dont understand how to do it, i think it would be ok if you did it though because you seem sensible enough in trying to keep this article tidy and organized. what i meant about the references was there is no proof that E.D. was discussed on these shows, surely for them to be included, you would have to link to the videos of the shows? e.g. countdown video, Dan Abrams, Morning Joe Perry mason (talk) 23:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Internet links or available video are not required for a proper citation. However, since you've done the work of finding the links, I will add them to the citations. Thanks! Gamaliel (talk) 23:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  temporarily protect from IP edits? 

message: What exactly is a master's degree in "government"? Government policy? Public policy? Political science? As far as I know, you can't get a degree in "government"--it's like getting a degree in "administration," i.e. what kind of governmentally-related field is she pursuing a degree in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrschum (talk • contribs) 20:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  master's 

message: The Harvard University Alumni records onlinehttps://post.harvard.edu/olc/membersonly/HAA/old/old.cgi?FNC=SIMPLESEARCH__Aindex_html do not include E.D. Hill, as Edith or E.D. or Tarbox or Weill or Hill or Donahey or any combination of these first and last names.
Maatje (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  E.D. Hill attended Harvard 

message: Is she still working for CNN???  I have not seen E.D. Whateverherfaceis since the Eliot Spitzer show went off the air.  I don't watch "The Blaze" so I don't know if she's on the payroll there.User:JCHeverly 18:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employment History???