lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phil Karn

message: Something should be added to this article about the Karn v. US lawsuit about exporting the floppy discs of the code from the first edition of Applied Cryptography.  Although that suit petered out somewhere along the way, it was instrumental (along with Bernstein v. United States) in getting US cryptographic export controls relaxed.  Phr (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I'm not supposed to edit my own article, I'll just cite my web page on the subject, http://www.ka9q.net/export, and let somebody else do it. We dropped the case when Clinton redid the rules to essentially drop all controls on public domain crypto software exports. That gave me pretty much everything I wanted so I considered it a win. Karn (talk) 08:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a short synopsis of the material. (You can correct any factual errors I've made - that's not COI). Good work, Phil! --Alvestrand (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karn v. US lawsuit 

message: I think the Kahn for round trip time is a different person... Also listing some of the RFC's might be good... .Like RFC1313. He was also a board member of TAPR. Vk2tds 23:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, same guy.  The reason he was so concerned about calculating the proper round trip time is that amateur radio    TCP/IP communications can have greatly varying round trip times depending on congestion. RussNelson 16:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFCs 

message: I remember Phil being active on several news groups in the early days of the internet supporting getting PCs connected to the internet.  Groups such as comp.sys.ibm.pc on the news servers and TCPIP-L and PCIP-L on the BITNET LISTSERVs.  Can we use google queries like "site:groups.google.com KA9Q" as references to this?  BTW:  Thank you Phil!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laughingskeptic (talk • contribs) 20:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Internet Contributions 

message: I just noticed that there's another Wikipedia page on another Phil Karn, a soccer player. In case anybody cares, we're third cousins. Karn (talk) 06:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "other" Phil Karn
Talk:Nikita Romanovich Zakharyin-Yuriev

message: Nikita Romanovich was married twice. Firstly, with Varvara Khovrina (d. 18 June 1552), the daughter of Ivan Khovrin. Secondly, with princess Eudoxia Gorbatov-Shuysky (d. 4 April 1581), the daughter of Prince Alexander Gorbatyi-Shuisky. For a long time historians assumed that his son Patriarch Filaret (Feodor Romanov) was borne from the first marriage. However, studies of Count Vasiliy Meshcherinov proved that Fedor was eldest son from the second marriage of his father. His daughter Irina was married to Prince Ivan Ivanovich Godunov, other daughter Euphimia was married to Prince Ivan Vasilievich Sitsky. Euphimia and her husband were by force maked a monks in the reign of tsar Boris Godunov.
:Sorry, who is "Count Vasiliy Meshcherinov"? I don't think there was a comital family Mescherinov in Imperial Russia. --Ghirla | talk 18:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I (and google too) don't know who is it, but RBD referred to his works as only source of statement about Rurikids mother of Feodor Romanov. Sure, needed more trustworthy reference. Kmorozov 06:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial stuff
Talk:Call Me Bwana

message: Since when did JFK have a famous rocking-chair?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.163.102 (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

message: EON Productions plugged Call Me Bwana with a big poster on the side of a building in which a bad guy climbed out of the mouth of in EON's Bond film From Russia with Love. 119.11.30.181 (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: From Russia with Love
Category talk:Nazis

message: Do we use this category only for peole for which there is proof that they were members of the NSDAP? Or do we also include people who approved of Nazi ideology or gave political support. I would prefer the first option, but regardless what we choose, it should be stated explicitly. Andries 18:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a question of this nature at Talk:Otto Beisheim.  Please take a look. NTK 03:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

message: There are a few people in this group labeled as Hungarian Nazis. However, Hungary did not have a Nazi party. I would suggest to move these people into a category called Fascists or something similar. They should be labeled as Anti-Semites as well.
(Eddie 00:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungarian Nazis 

message: German WP uses the :de:Kategorie:NSDAP-Mitglied for 1739 articles about NSDAP Nazi party members. I'd say :Category:NSDAP members would be a category better fitting to an encyclopedia. Besides, some Hitler youth were automatically registered as party members in the last years of the war. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two different categories, :de:Kategorie:NSDAP-Mitglied for membership, and :de:Nationalsozialismus (Person). --Pjacobi (talk) 08:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: I've tried to diffuse all articles that were directly put in this category. For some 20 articles this wasn't possible because the article did not clearly express if the person was really a member of the Nazi party, or anything else more specific. Not sure what to do with them, purging would not be very appropriate either. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diffuse
Talk:College Football All-America Team

message: I added the tag with the following improvments in mind:
#Splitting article into relevant, headed sections
#Adding in appropriate inter-page links
#Tabulating list of people which appear to be players in the team
#Making abbreviations such as QB, RB and WR clearer. I don't have a clue what they mean
Deskana (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page was largely based on a copyright violation, which I reverted. Afterwards I did a bit of article cleanup. Hopefully these edits properly address your improvement suggestions. jareha 06:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me! Deskana (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag as of 23 January 2006 
Talk:Wing Scout

message: I think this article would be better off merged with FA candidate GSUSA.  It would help enhance both articles and would give this one a chance to have more attention brought to it as a part of GSUSA.  Mariner Scout has already been merged. Darthgriz98 16:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Air Scouts is a general term for a world-wide series of programs. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Theodore Draper

message: In the event that a relative of Theodore Draper happens to find this page, please do not hesitate to write if you happen to have additional information, family photos, etc. which may be placed into the public domain. Thanks!  —Tim Davenport, Early American Marxism website, Corvallis, OR MutantPop@aol.com  Carrite (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to relatives
Talk:Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight

message: Potential future operator due to not repairing old Russian Mi-17E due to sanctions Memelephant (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argentina Looking to buy 

message: Citation number 75 is 404 on both the original link and also the archived link. 2604:2D80:6305:600:2011:19AA:1998:BAF9 (talk) 22:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 75
Category talk:Scouting stubs

message: Is there a way to check/look at/list how many pages link to a stub? For example, Alexander Anderson McHardy has only 62 words; the information on his parents and wife are incidental and perhaps not necessary to the purposes of Scouting information.  My thought/question is this: if only one or two pages link to him, his page could be folded up. But how can I tell? Scoutersig 16:29, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, on the left side of the screen when you are in the article, the next tab under the search is "what links here", click that and it will make you a list. The reason those articles are Scouting stubs is that they have something to do with someone of note who was involved in Scouting. I wouldn't remove the stuff about their wives, etc., if they exist, they may actually be more famous in some other field. Chris 01:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Southern Pacific 4294

message: Moved this comment here from the end of the Preservation section...
:The above is not at all a correct statement of the Museum's position.  The Museum knows of no specific physical obstacle to returning the locomotive to operating condition other than cost.  The estimated cost of restoring SP 4294 to operating condition - or for any similar locomotive of its size - is in the neighborhood of $1 million to $1.5 million dollars.  Current policies of both Union Pacific and of BNSF are that neither would allow SP 4294 to operate on their rails after such a restoration.  Given all the important needs of the Museum, the priorities are to put that kind of money into things that the museum could get real use out of, rather than spending $1 million plus on SP 4294 just to boiler very expensive water and not run anywhere.  Meanwhile the Museum has done nothing to preclude a future restoration to operation, should there be changes that would make that worthwhile.
:Kyle K. Wyatt
:Curator of History & Technology
:California State Railroad Museum
:—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.105.90.150 (talk • contribs).
This will need to be integrated into the text properly. Slambo (Speak) 10:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration 
Talk:Malbim

message: I decided not to include http://www.malbim.org/, which is just the JE article and a lot of ads. I do wonder if the image from the JE should be included, as it is bound to be PD. JFW | T@lk 18:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Should not the article include the full Hebrew name from which the acronym is derived? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Really these acronym names shouldn't be encyclopedia article titles anyway. I mean we all know who JFK and FDR are, but we don't have articles under the acronym. What is the common form for this bio in Google Scholar? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions]]

message: Where is the source that his family name was Weiser?
Barryfadams (talk) 00:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Source for Name]]

message: Hi, I've added an NPOV tag here. Just looked up this figure to learn about him, and found an article full of insufficiently sourced claims about defeats of opponents, and non-neutral language to do with the "falsehood" of their claims, failures in observance of Judaism, etc. I'd love to learn more about him here from an article that was less obviously written from a partisan perspective.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.45.182 (talk) 22:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Dispute 
Talk:General ledger

message: I'd like to say avery dnf a huge thank you to the person who started this article and another thank you for those who have been expanding it. Even though it's a stub it has helped ,thanks for all for giving good knowledge and create ancaount would
I just completely revamped the entire article. Let me know what you think?--Lance 05:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you

message: HI,
This is good we can learn lot many thing from here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.30.139.132 (talk) 06:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: What is the difference between a general ledger and a ledger?  Should these by merged?  If not the distinction needs to clarified in the articles. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference?
Template talk:Main/Archive 2

message: Hi - my immediate reaction is to list this in Template for Deletion, however I see you are running a bot, and I want to hear what the justification for this fork of the main template is before I put it up for deletion. I also suspect this template was allready TfD'd in the past and thus the resulting redirect. --Stbalbach 18:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a fork, per se. Currently, Template:Main supports up to 5 parameters in the form {(main|1|2|3|4|5}}.  That requires some very complex coding (see the source of that template).  Ideally, this template should just accept a single parameter, which can be like {(main article|1}} or {(main articles|1, 2, 3}}.  By converting the few articles that used this template to that format, we now have a place where we can now start converting the rest to use the single parameter method. -- Netoholic @ 18:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The main template should remain, but have new code, if thats what decided. Change the code of main, not create a whole new template, it's a fork.  TfD conversations have supported this position over and over, we have a single main template, and this is and always has been {main}. Discuss it on the {main} talk page is the proper way to go about it. I believe that the removal of the redirect for this template is in violation of a previous TfD vote. --Stbalbach 19:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, that's fine... the problem is in the timing.  If you change Main first, all the articles break.  If you change the articles first, they look bad until you're completely done and can change the template. Main_article was a redirect with a few links to it, so I changed the template and quickly converted the pages using it.  Now, we have a place to convert Main's articles to.  After they all get moved, we can just change Main into a redirect here. -- Netoholic @ 19:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial reaction 

message: I cant tell for sure, but is it indented? It should be to match others and was before. -- Stbalbach 16:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tell that to Netoholic. I've reverted. --Khoikhoi 19:24, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indentation
Talk:Introduction to Leadership Skills for Crews

message: Now Introduction to Leadership Skills for Crews. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 04:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to Leadership Skills for Crews 
Talk:Geas

message: Could anyone in the know add a remark about the pronunciation of the word? Qatharsis 11:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added, but my IPA isn't great.  If someone wants to check to make sure it's correct (should result in a word sounding like gesh, with a hard g) then I'd appreciate it. g026r 14:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like you got it right.  I just added { {IPA|} } to clean it up. Gitman00 15:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did the IPA get messed up somehow? It's currently listed as [ˈkes], but for "gesh" it should be [ˈgeʃ] or [ˈgɛʃ], depending on the vowel sound. (This website indicates it's the latter option: http://www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-gei1.htm) Evaliir (talk) 16:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: IIRC, this was originally at Geasa, and the article was written as if Geasa were the singular.  I'm pretty sure I'm the one who changed it to the singular, Geas.  But the thing is, there's nothing in here about Scottish lore, and it seems silly to have it under the Scottish version of the name.  So, I'm moving it to the OI and Mod. Ir form, Geis.  - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 07:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move

message: We could use some sourcing on this. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 20:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tynged]]

message: The examples by Shakespeare and Tolkien aren't really geasa; they're quibbles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.35.208.4 (talk) 06:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quibble

message: Considering the notoriety of the anime Code Geass, shouldn't this page have an In Popular Culture section referencing that geas are used as the inspiration for the powers that are used by the characters in that story? 130.126.143.59 (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: See Irish mythology in popular culture: Geis. That's where that stuff goes. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 04:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: In Popular Culture?
Talk:Powder Horn (Boy Scouts of America)

message: Support.Rlevse 19:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about just merging all of these training stubs together into one article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.222.149 (talk) 19:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of other PH article
Talk:Western Los Angeles County Council

message: Mostly a list containing data that's already in other places.  Recommend a merge to Scouting in California.  KC9CQJ 16:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By and large it's not a great idea to have council pages, we had to clean up several dozen one-paragraph wonders to get them at all readable and combined as a state format, as agreed upon by the Scouting WikiProject. Larger existing articles with good content, however, have not been merged, just hyperlinked. Based on the particular content that is not (yet) in this article, I support the merge. Chris 21:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

text: You know, putting the fact that I authored beginnings (and most of the current content) article, I'd have to agree very much with scoutersig that merging this with the larger categories would create something that is too large and cumbersome. I know the scouting wikiproject is trying to merge everything, but really all that will do is make articles too large to be useful and two concise to be meaningful. I intend to comment on that there as well. In addition, this article's current content was intended as a beginning to be added on by other users. Councils like WLACC have a rich history that would be lost to other encyclopedias who don't have the manpower or the space to find it, Wikipedia offers the opportunity that none of the others can in potentially having both. If you look at my contribution's you'll see I'm big on keeping things relevant, sourced, and notable, so perhaps every council does not warrant it's own page- that's something I'd be willing to even debate for this article- but that doesn't mean each individual article should be pigeonholed into non-existance. ~ Falls End (T, C) 22:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Brother, that's not at all what we're trying to do, the point is that the content is not there at the moment. I would be most supportive of leaving the article as it is now, if and only if it is filled with new information.  As it stands, it's not really there yet. I agree it is worthy if you will put in more content. Chris 00:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If for no other reason than consistency throughout the project, we should follow our agreed upon policy.  If an article gets too large following that, we'll worry about that at the time it happens, so far there hasn't been enough info in the smaller articles to keep them separate. Rlevse 21:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: Please see Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content_review#Scouting_Articles. An archive can be found here. --evrik (talk) 20:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Current debate on images
Talk:Silicon Valley Monterey Bay Council

message: In compliance with Scouting WikiProject policy on sub-council entities, I propose the expansion of this article, with information added from Scouting_in_California#Santa_Clara_County_Council and the folding in of all camps. Local articles really need to be council level rather than by camp or lodge. Examples of good Council articles include Cradle of Liberty Council and Chester County Council, all others have been or are stubs, and we really are trying to avoid sub-council articles. Chris 01:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --TinMan 04:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: expansion request and merges

message: Stub article with little room for growth.   Gadget850 talk 20:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Monterey Bay Area Council]]
Talk:Ripsaw

message: Is is not rather superfluous to have this article (stub) as well as the one titled rip cut? I think they could be usefully combined into one article.
Also, the image of a rip saw shown here is so similar to the one shown at crosscut saw, it's impossible to see any meaningful difference. It would be nicer to see e.g. a black & white diagram of the teeth demonstrating the differences between the two... Maybe even the same diagram on both pages, to save resources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ozaru (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I added the section on technical information (TPI, weight, length, etc). However, I've had no success in finding out the weight, length, and other such things. Can anyone help with this? - Two-Sixteen.11.222.21 18:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rip saw →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Webster's Dictionary, Dictionary.com, and thefreedictionary.com all list it as "ripsaw" and Britannica also titles their article as "ripsaw". Additionally, the Google Ngrams stow that "ripsaw" is the more common spelling. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 February 2022
Talk:Cuncar of Angus

message: I believe that "Cruithne" may be recorded as a personal name too, as Angus is.--MacRusgail 19:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know another example of this (the Pictish king list isn't another example btw ;) )? - Calgacus 19:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruithne
Talk:Controlled Bleeding

message: This article is in a very sad state, and I'm going to try and rewrite it from scratch. I'm totally unaffiliated with the group, but I think they're an important act in experimental music and thus they need a better page here which goes into some detail about their history and the contents of various releases. I've put some changes up and if nobody reverts them, I'll write more. --Lorenjan (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking, Jan 2011 

message: Mention of Paul's "Dry Lungs" (there were several) compilation albums might be included.
for example, i found this: http://www.discogs.com/release/439880
24.19.9.251 19:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add the relevent section if your wish. Cnwb 22:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dry Lungs 

message: This article has a very promotional feel to it and reads like it may have been written by Paul Lemos himself. It really needs rewritten with a more neutral POV. - Artificial Silence (talk) 08:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, the article seems to be completely copied from Controlled Bleeding's website. Anyway, I fill in some wikilinks... --Hlamerz (talk) 08:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self Promotion / Neutral POV 

message: Don't Wax Trax and Cleopatra count as "more important indie labels" (criterion #5) ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.23.44.116 (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability ? 