Talk:Nitrocellulose

message: The negative effects of the nitrocellulose in the environment and positiveand also the overview.
:That sentence no verb.  scot 14:05, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Negative effects

message: Aren't there only 7 hydrogens in nitrocellulose? Cellulose has 10, and 3 hydroxyl groups are nitrated, yes? I'm not quite positive, but I'll make the change in a few days if nobody objects. 72.40.101.236 19:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, shouldn't there also be 3 nitrate groups instead of 2? 72.40.101.236 19:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  C6H8(NO2)2O5 ? 

message: Was nitrocellulose not also used as rocket fuel (rocket propellant)?  See the entry on Wikipedia for katyusa rockets.
--Skb8721 00:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocket Fuel 

message: I understand flash paper used(?) to be used by bookies because it could be instantly destroyed in case of a raid -- particularly easy in the days when everyone smoked.  Or maybe that was just on TV...  --Wfaxon 22:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another use for flash paper 

message: "It was then slowly dried at a temperature below 100°C." Is this accurate? 100 degrees celcius is the boiling point of water and generally not something you get naturally. Its not like "store out of direct sunlight" or something. Anyone know if this is the actual case, or if maybe it was farenheit? WookMuff 08:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  100°C 

message: "The US Navy shot a training film for projectionists that included footage of a controlled ignition of a reel of nitrate film, which continued to burn even when fully submerged in water."
If the film being referred to is This Film is Dangerous, then it was not shot by the US Navy, but commissioned by the (British) Royal Navy, in 1948. LDGE (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Navy Training Film

message: "Decades later storage at low temperatures was discovered as a means of delaying these reactions indefinitely." (my emphasis)
Not strictly true.  Research (mainly through Arrhenius testing) on the decomposition of cellulose esters by the Image Permanence Institute and others have established that if nitrate film is put into cold and dry storage before it has reached stage 2 in the FIAF decomposition scale, its decomposition can be inhibited (i.e. the process slowed down, not 'delayed', which implies that it is prevented from happening at all) for possibly up to several hundreds of years, depending on the level of acidity in the film base to start with (which varies quite a lot between manufacturers and time periods).  But that is not 'indefinite', and best practice in film preservation includes regular inspection of all nitrate elements in passive conservation.
"The material was replaced by polyester or PET film, which is much more resistant to polymer degradation."
It was initially replaced by cellulose triacetate (see C. Fordyce, 'Improved Safety Motion Picture Film Support', Journal of the SMPE, vol. 51 (1948), pp.331-50) for camera negatives, intermediate elements and release printing in the motion picture industry.  Polyester was not used on any significant scale until the late '80s/early '90s, and even then only for release printing.
If no-one raises any objections I'll edit the section to incorporate these corrections in a few days. LDGE (talk) 07:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other errors in nitrate film section

message: This section cites a page that cites wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.95.17 (talk) 02:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: exploding billiard balls

message: The nitrocellulose it self is non toxic
The toxicity depends of the damping agent ex. Ethanol, Di ethilic ehter, acetone, etc.
Erroneous valour LD 56mg/Kg.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lacrthxx14 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lethal dosis  

message: I noticed that under pages like the Improved Military Rifle, and Smokeless Powder pages, nitrocellulose is mentioned as being one of the primary ingredients in forming modern smokeless powder. Yet on this page it sounds mostly like nitrocellulose is not used any more because it is too unstable and volatile. Which is it? --71.229.74.0 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is used; and, yes, nitrocellulose is inherently unstable. The manufacturing process for military-grade nitrocellulose contains processing stages to reduce the levels of impurities that can contribute to instability and Smokeless powders contain stabilisers to counteract these effects; and for military powders with a long intended "shelf life" that meant carrying out periodic stability testing. Pyrotec (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: So is it used or not?

message: This article is fundamentally flawed in that it mixes up the different nitrated cellulose products.  Pyroxylin (Greek "fire" + "wood"), a partially nitrated product, is mentioned only tangentially, although that was the product which was widely used and first plasticized with camphor.  Early chemists were quite good at elemental analysis, and knew how much nitrogen had been introduced. Pyroxylin is characterized by being soluble in a low-cost mixture of ethyl ether and alcohol as well as other solvents; more highly nitrated guncotton is only soluble in more expensive esters or ketones such as amyl acetate or acetone.  Collodion was made with pyroxylin.  Only guncotton was in fact "insoluble nitrocellulose", intended to be as fully nitrated as practical when used as an explosive or ingredient.  The issues of purity and shelf life apply to both.
The original sources need to be examined to determine what they were using. Does a more fully nitrated product make a better billiard ball (doubtful)?  Or perhaps a clearer motion picture film (possible)?165.121.80.247 (talk) 03:26, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is also flawed in its narrative of how the material was "invented."  If the supposed three independent researchers developed it in the same year of 1846, where is the justification for the claim of who first developed it?  got it - was Schönbein.Wikibearwithme (talk) 05:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is fundamentally flawed 

message: Many sources — including this article — claim that Christian Frederich Schönbein accidentally invented guncotton when he mopped up some spilled nitric acid with his wife's apron.  However, no source provides an original source for this story (which is extremely suspicious).  Indeed, Schönbein himself makes no mention of it in his own account of how guncotton was invented:
*  Schœnbein (1847) "On the discovery of gun-cotton," Philosophical Magazine, 3rd series, 31 :  7-12.
In his original announcement of his invention of guncotton, he does not mention any apron:
*  Schönbein (May 27, 1846) "Ueber Schiesswolle" (On guncotton) Bericht über die Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel, 7 :  27.
As late as 1901, in a German monograph that was devoted to him and his work, there's no mention of any apron:
*  Georg W. A. Kahlbaum, "Schiessbaumwolle und Kollodium. 1846-1853." (Guncotton and collodion. 1846-1853.) in:   Monographieen aus der Geschichte der Chemie: Christian Friedrich Schönbein 1799-1868. (Leipzig, Germany:  Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1901),  pp. 109-178.
Indeed, Schönbein provides only a slight hint about how he might have discovered guncotton.  In —
*  C. F. Schoenbein (1847) "Ueber eine eigenthümliche Veränderung des Zukers, durch Salpeter-Schwefelsäure bewerkstelligt" (On a characteristic change of sugar effected by nitric-sulfuric acid), Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 70 :  100-105.
Schönbein states on p. 104 that when he treated sugar with a mixture of nitric and sulfuric acids, the resulting compound would form a brownish red solution in warm potassium carbonate solution.  "Diese, bis zur Trockniss abgedampft, lässt einen braunschwarzen Rückstand, der in der Hitze verpufft."  (This, evaporated to dryness, leaves a brownish black residue, which detonates in heat.)  Thus he knew that mixing sugar with nitric and sulfuric acids would form an explosive.  Since Henri Braconnot had shown in 1819 that wood could be transformed into sugar by means of sulfuric acid —
*  Henri Braconnot (1819) "Mémoire sur la conversion du corps ligneux en gomme, en sucre, et en un acide d’une nature particulière, par le moyen de l’acide sulfurique; conversion de la méme substance ligneuse en ulmine par la potasse" (Memoir on the conversion of woody substances into gum, sugar, and an acid of a particular nature, by means of sulfuric acid; conversion of the same woody substance into ulmine by potash), Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 12 :  172–195.
it would not require a great leap of imagination to suspect that subjecting vegetable fibers (e.g., cotton) to a mixture of nitric and sulfuric acids might also produce an explosive compound.
Meanwhile, I will continue to look for the earliest mention of the explosive apron story.
Cwkmail (talk) 08:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Schönbein & his exploding apron?

message: The link displayed is https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturforschende_Gesellschaft_in_Basel but it should be https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulosenitrat . Funny thing is when I click Edit links the entry for dewiki is correct. Maybe someone with more knowledge about the wiki-internals can help out. 137.226.36.183 (talk) 09:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've fixed it now. Thanks for reporting the issue. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 09:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to german Wikipedia article is wrong

message: This content may be of interest here. HLHJ (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited content removed from [[viscose]] article 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion