Talk:Theta vacuum

message: Would this vacuum angle be considered to be a mixing angle?  70.247.165.249 (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing angle? 

message: This article does not say what the 'vacuum angle' is. The word 'vacuum' is not even used in this article. I would guess that the thing called theta angle in this article is identical to the vacuum angle, but I don't know if that is true.
The article should start with something like:
:"The vacuum angle is a parameter in quantum guage theories, that describes how functionals change under a big guage transformation. It is one of the parameters in the standard model, and as of 2013, experimental results indicate that the vacuum angle is close to zero."
The reason that I don't add this to the article, is that I don't know if this description is true, it is only what I understood from this article and other wikipedia articles. If somebody who is more expert on this than me could improve this description and add it to the article, the article would improve in my opinion. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 12:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition missing 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Theta vacuum and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Theta vacuum until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  OpenScience709 (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Theta vacuum" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Theta angle and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Theta angle until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Theta angle" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Theta vacuum. Despite low participaiton, reasonable arguments have been given in favor of the move.   No such user (talk) 08:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Vacuum angle →  – "Theta vacuum" is the main relevant topic of the page while "Vacuum angle" is a much less common name for what is being described as it is merely the parameter that indexes the various theta vacua. Most common textbooks and papers usually refer to the theta vacuum rather than vacuum angle as well. I cannot make the move myself as Theta vacuum is already a redirect on the page. OpenScience709 (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Mdewman6 (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Physics has been notified of this discussion. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 February 2022