Talk:The Biggest Loser (American TV series)

message: Second places, third places and at-home winners should not be listed. Also the records should be trimmed. It's all original research. -Koppapa (talk) 21:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: stats mess

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on The Biggest Loser (U.S. TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100308110700/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000937471 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000937471
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100722095055/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002576393 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002576393
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on The Biggest Loser (U.S. TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120102063804/http://www1.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad261604f to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad261604f?pn=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: All of this text seems very original research: "This is true even though that weight-loss rate originates from an examination of the database from the National Weight Control Registry, where members have lost a minimum of 30 pounds and maintained that weight loss for a minimum of a year. So while researchers did find a correlation between that rate, on average, with members of the Registry, all this correlation can mean—if there is any causal correlation at all (there is no control group) -- is that it is more likely, on average, for someone to be successful at losing a large amount of weight, and more successful at maintaining that weight loss. There is no way of stating whether this rate is more healthy than any other rate, simply because (a) there is no comparison with any other rate, and not even any comparison between disease or mortality rates of members of this Registry and any other random group."
19:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also an extraordinarily poorly written paragraph.  I'm still not entirely sure what it's trying to communicate. 2A00:23C8:4DAB:8001:A961:48CA:2C72:3A40 (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research, Citation Needed 

message: I  lost  a lot  of  weight  I  Ray  125  pounds 166.181.85.146 (talk) 22:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stacey  folks