Talk:The Student Room

message: I see that Ninman has posted again despite his edits being deleted three times before.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.129.64.35 (talk) 11:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not with those seeking to remove it." --Chrisjwowen 10:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted the TSRUS POV; the member numbers seem accurate enough. Just gave the article a quick edit, I'll add anything else substantial that comes to mind later.
Sorry, forgot to sign: Mister Five 19:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: pig

message: Mel Etitis, do you want a copy of my P45 or something?! I left TSR almost 2 months ago, access to my account has been revoked, and I no longer work for them. You're adament I need to reference this minor change. You have to reference facts contained within the article but you don't have to reference things NOT in the article! It was perfectly explained that C was removed because I said so in the edit. --Chrisjwowen 09:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not with those seeking to remove it." --Chrisjwowen 10:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of C

message: Does someone who knows a bit more about the site want to write history section and how and when it got started and developed? I don't really know a great deal about the place in this respect, but to grow so big, I'm sure it must have been around a fair while in one form or another and been developed from a smaller site. Evil Eye 13:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the site

message: I have listed this as a POV Check until I am able to verify the statements regarding TSR US and its member base/post count. Once done, Ill reconsider its listing. Lessthanthree 19:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted the TSRUS POV; the member numbers seem accurate enough. Just gave the article a quick edit, I'll add anything else substantial that comes to mind later.
Sorry, forgot to sign: Mister Five 19:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV-Check

message: The page appears to have no formatting atm... {Athena}
=== Stats ===
There's no need to update the stats all the time is there? Just when significant numbers are reached. Pig@thestudentroom.co.uk 01:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's best to keep the article as up to date and accurate as possible. But if you don't like it, you could always change it back :-) Evil Eye 07:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you can if you want but it just seems like a waste of your time! 'More than 5 million posts' would have sufficed til we got to 6 million. Pig@thestudentroom.co.uk 13:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page appearence 

message: There's no need to update the stats all the time is there? Just when significant numbers are reached. Pig@thestudentroom.co.uk 01:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's best to keep the article as up to date and accurate as possible. But if you don't like it, you could always change it back :-) Evil Eye 07:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you can if you want but it just seems like a waste of your time! 'More than 5 million posts' would have sufficed til we got to 6 million. Pig@thestudentroom.co.uk 13:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats 

message: I have reverted edits made by Ninman on the basis that it:
*Refers to himself;
*Appears to be a grievance held against pig and SilverWings;
*Links to a dubious and most definitely unencyclopaedic website.
CJHung 19:55, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 16/9/06 justification 

message: I have reverted Ninman's entry again. This will be the 3rd revert (twice by myself and once by AntiVandalBot). Ninman is perfectly welcome to discuss his contributions here.
CJHung 12:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 18/9/06 

message: There are a lot of changes currently happening at TSR that are likely to prompt frequent re-edits of this page. I've tried to include the only information that isn't speculative - it would be helpful if other users could respect this. Cheers. Wadhamite 08:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CITE is the key policy here; changes need to have verifiable sources. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 09:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

text: That source cerianly backs up some of your edits; I've edited the article, mainly by just removing references to specific people, leaving details of the posts. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 14:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current state of TSR

message: :Image:TSRCP.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TSRCP.jpg

message: Hello! I work for The Student Room and we've noticed that the page is a little bare in parts. It lacks a logo, links to forums and some of the information stops at 2007.
We don't want to edit the page ourselves, as this contravenes the ethos of Wikipedia, but it'd be great if the whole page could be brought into 2012 in terms of history, design and changing focus (thanks to the people who have updated parts of it!)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheStudentRoom111 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update for the page 

message: Couruu (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion