lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Men in Black: The Series episodes

message: I removed the deletion tag because this is a standard list of episodes page and their is a consensus to not delete them.  I removed the context tag because I added a lead paragraph explaining the list.  I removed the wikify tag because of the links in the lead paragraph, and the fact that nothing else needs links. - Peregrine Fisher 06:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag removal 

message: "This episode is no longer shown in America due to the ending taking place at the top of the World Trade Center and having eerie similarities to the events of 9/11." Eerie similarities? I saw the episode and I doubt, the similarities would be eerie. Who says it? Some citations would be nice why they yanked this episode off the air. 81.183.160.236 (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/11 

message: Vangus?! Isn't it Vengiss? 195.228.197.183 (talk) 11:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vangus?! 

message: I noticed that three episodes I recorded from The Hub (TV channel) have different names from the ones on the list:
* Episode 8: "The Inanimate Syndrome" aired as "The Farewell My Lovely Syndrome"
* Episode 11: "The Elle of My Dreams Syndrome" aired as "The Big Sleep Syndrome"
* Episode 34: "The Lights Out Syndrome" aired as "The Permanent Midnight Syndrome"
I can't find any source online to backup my original research though. Hopefully somebody can add it to the article when they find a source.
Also, somebody should explain that the "Code" column denotes the production order. The episodes were originally aired out of order according to TV Tropes. If you want the continuity to work, you will have to watch the episodes according to the production code.
aibyou_chan (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Episode Names
Talk:Milan Jelić

message: He died. Don't have news in English, but have in Serbian: http://www.mtsmondo.com/news/vesti/text.php?vest=72170  --Mladjo1988 21:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: died
Talk:Westgate Mall (Ohio)

message: As far as I can tell, this complex is now called "Westgate Shopping Center".   Should the article be renamed and updated? -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct / new name
Talk:Dry gas

message: "Some states require a 10-15% ethanol solution be sold at refueling stations."... Can I suggest someone add the states which an ethanol mix is required? -- ViaBest 02:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List States Which Require Ethanol Mix 

message: The statement, "There is no point in adding dry gas to fuel that already contains a significant percentage of ethanol, since ethanol is an alcohol" fails to recognize that ethanol may not have the same "drying" effects in gasoline as do isopropanol or methanol. Not all alcohols act the same.  Also, the statement lacks any citation and appears to be personal opinion.  I suggest someone either remove it or reword it and add a citation.
Techguy95 (talk) 04:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement of personal opinion without citation and failure to distinguish between ethanol and methanol or isopropanol.  

message: It seems that the ethanol in the gas as delivered could be saturated already, due to water in the delivery trucks and storage tanks en route from the refinery to the vehicle.  Citation needed in any case.  Pgf (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is dry-gas really superfluous when using fuel containing ethanol? 

message: The second paragraph is badly written.  The context is not clear (are gas stations required to sell 10-15% ethanol, like in plastic containers? or is the ethanol required to be in the gasoline?), several of the sentences aren't even sentences.
Someone who knows this subject and who has a good grasp of technical english needs to take a look at this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.7.106.9 (talk) 18:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Paragraph Terrible 

message: The paragraph on gasoline ethanol content (as well as the benefits of using dry gas over ethanol) could be moved to another section Shivrm (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move gasoline ethanol content to a seperate section
Talk:Rainmaker

message: I deleted the part that said
"*The Rainmakers is a guild on the World of Warcraft server Kirin Tor, founded in December 2005."
Yeah, I mean, I love Warcraft and all, but there are a ton of servers (and even more guilds), and it really doesnt belong in an encylcopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smooth0707 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Armenian Canadians

message: Shouldn't this be named Armenian-Canadians? --VartanM 01:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/United States Presidential trivia (2nd nomination)

message: Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Presidential trivia (second nomination), where you said:
::The result was no consensus. --Coredesat 21:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This vote was actually merge then delete but he put weak keep in bold.  I asked him to correct the discrepancy and he said the bold part was not important. Jerry lavoie 02:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I believe you closed this in error
Talk:Keen Eddie

message: i really love it but i dont know how to create them :( thanks!--ometzit<col> 03:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: anyone can please create a userbox about this series,

message: I love Keen Eddie.  Found it on Sleuth when I switched to satellite earlier this year. Thought it was a new show. Duh.  Now I wonder what else I have been missing. What else is out there?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.173.95 (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone know of other shows like this? 
Talk:Tahrunessa Abdullah

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KGV 05:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Jean-Baptiste Pompallier

message: Jean Baptiste Francoise Pompallier was born in 1801 not 1802 - the confusion comes from the revolutionary numbering of years. The French Wiki has it right.
Jean-Baptiste François Pompallier naît le 11 décembre 1801 (20 frimaire an X) au 79 place du Port-Neuville dans le 1er arrondissement de Lyon, fils de Pierre et Françoise PompallierRegistre d'état civil de la ville de Lyon, acte de naissance n° 226, an X, registre en ligne p.34/138, Archives municipales de Lyon..Jacobusorigine (talk) 01:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth of Bishop Pompallier 

message: This page needs a picture. Polziper 22:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One has been added! :) V. Joe (talk) 21:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Nuclear matrix

message: The nuclear matrix hypothesis is indeed subject to controversial discussion among scientists. By relying on just one opinionated resource to make its claims, this article is biased. It needs to be expanded to include more references and fairly represent both sides of a controversial scientific debate. - tameeria 03:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality questioned

message: The article is written in an excessively technical style and the sentences are grammatically poor. Sometimes this is done for the sake of brevity, and may be appropriate for a scientific journal, but in Wikipedia, it gives the appearance that the writer is showing off. The article should be rewritten to make it accessible to an educated but nonspecialist reader. 76.93.209.228 (talk) 06:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Showing off
Talk:Triiodothyronine

message: :Oppose merge. Most of the information should remain in the thyroid hormone article, but it is useful to have this article in cases where the forms need to be distinguished. --Arcadian 03:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose merge 

message: I'm very concerned about the production heading, I really don't think that that's right. It has a biochemistry explanation that could be right (but doesn't look right and I don't have a textbook w/ me) and I think that a physiology explanation would be far more useful. A basic walk-through of the steps involved would probably do the casual reader a lot more justice. A3camero (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Heading 

message: References to "reverse-T3" and "TriiodoLIOthyronine" would be much appreciated in this article. Also, if anyone knows whether standard T3 blood tests include reverse-T3 or not.
Geebee2K (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triiodoliothyronine and Reverse T3 

message: The involvement of thyroid peroxidase in iodinating tyrosine explained on this page contradicts the mechanism on the thyroid peroxidase page. That page says that iodine released by TPO spontaneously binds to the tyrosine with no TPO intermediation.
173.25.54.191 (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism 

message: The Synthesis of T4 section here says that Type I Deiodinase is responsible for 80% of the conversion of T4 to T3, and leaves it at that.
But the Iodothyronine_deiodinase#Types article claims that Type I Deiodinase is also capable of converting T4 into Reverse T3.
What's the scoop here?
:--Rogermw (talk) 23:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis of T4
Talk:Jordančo Davitkov

message: Does anyone know if Jordanco Davitkov is Jewish? His surname is an eastern European Jewish name. Cheers AWN AWN2 03:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish
Talk:Two-photon excitation microscopy

message: I think the article would benefit if it's easy to add an example of the improvement of resolution, particularly z-direction over single-photon excitation, and comparison with confocal and other techniques.--Skoch3 03:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The purpose of employing the two-photon effect is ... the resolution along the z dimension is improved, allowing for thin optical sections to be cut. ... the probability for fluorescent ... quadratically with the excitation intensity. ... Effectively, excitation is restricted to the tiny focal volume (~1 femtoliter), resulting in a high degree of rejection of out-of-focus objects. 
Is this a mistake, i.e., isn't the idea to allow the sample to be cut into thicker sections without the usual associated sacrifice of resolving contrast? Cesiumfrog (talk) 23:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Extent of resolution improvement

message: how can two photons of 1/2E add up to be slightly more than E?  should include explanation of this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.213.67.55 (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  energy conservation 

message: I presume it is a mistake when the included figure states PTM. This should probably be changed to PMT (PhotoMultiPlier)?
[2014.03.17_20:55] Yes, the figure should indicate emission collection via photomultiplier tubes (PMTs).
While working on :de:Multiphotonenmikroskop, I uploaded the following image files to commons, all from the same article. Just in case somebody feels like to work them into the English version as well... --Dietzel65 (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: This article states that: 
"The two-photon excitation microscope is a special variant of the multiphoton fluorescence microscope."
I am under the impression that two photon and multi photon are interchangeable terms with identical meanings and that one is not actually a "variant" of the other at all. I believe that the latter was used to avoid a trademark infringement. 
2.220.208.183 (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two verses multi 

message: Reference 9 and 12 are duplicated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.220.208.183 (talk) 17:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, benmoore 09:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: It would be useful for visitors if the main article could explain whether the technique is still widely used or not. This probably requires someone who has expertise in this area to make some estimate, and perhaps add a few articles that reinforce that opinion. I, as a visitor and only semi-casual knowledgable person, right now wonder whether this technique from 1990 is still widely used today. I have not heard about it yet but I have seen a few laser scanning fluorescence microscopes so far (they often use multiple techniques, so it is hard to know what they all use and don't use, such as this technique or not). 2A02:8388:1641:8380:8920:7EEB:D50A:6466 (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present-day usage
Talk:Shediac

message: move.
Rename: Shediac, New Brunswick → Shediac
Per WP:CANSTYLE and WP:PRIMARYUSAGE, this town should have an article at the undisambiguated name (see also WP:CANCITY). An internet search which excludes Wikipedia mirrors and "New Brunswick" still produces results exclusively related to it. Mindmatrix 15:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename page
Talk:Gait abnormality

message: Waddling/Myopathic gait
Walking like a duck.
Pregnancy 
Is this for real???
--Vlmastra 03:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  The extra weight and bulk can change the gait in late stage pregnancy.  It may be more common with twins (or more), or among women whose back/ab/leg muscles are weak.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Waddling
Talk:Japanese cruiser Naniwa

message: A reader contacted Wikimedia via OTRS to report:
Each of the following pages in Wikipedia has the same error:
Japanese cruiser Matsushima
Japanese cruiser Itsukushima
Japanese cruiser Hashidate
Japanese cruiser Naniwa
Japanese cruiser Takachiho
Japanese  cruiser Yoshino
Each of these warships participated in the Battle of the Yalu fought on 9/17/1894. Each of the above Wikipedia articles gives specific details about the number of shells fired, and/or hits received. In each and every case the source of reference for those details is the same. The source is quoted as a book entitled "The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Powers and Primacy" by S.C.M. Paine. Each reference lists the pages 133-134 as the source.
I have a copy of the book and the pages 133-134 refer to a prior naval engagement that took place on 7/25/1894 and only the Naniwa was present. The book does describe the Battle of the Yalu but only in general terms; not even the names of the ships involved are mentioned.
The writer may have cited the wrong source, but the source cited in each of the above articles is most assuredly incorrect.
I believe the book used to cite the claims is:
* 
I did not find the information in the book. I hope some editor can either verify that the information is in the source, identify a different source to support the claims, or remove the claims.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue regarding a source 
Talk:Japanese cruiser Takachiho

message: A reader contacted Wikimedia via OTRS to report:
Each of the following pages in Wikipedia has the same error:
Japanese cruiser Matsushima
Japanese cruiser Itsukushima
Japanese cruiser Hashidate
Japanese cruiser Naniwa
Japanese cruiser Takachiho
Japanese  cruiser Yoshino
Each of these warships participated in the Battle of the Yalu fought on 9/17/1894. Each of the above Wikipedia articles gives specific details about the number of shells fired, and/or hits received. In each and every case the source of reference for those details is the same. The source is quoted as a book entitled "The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Powers and Primacy" by S.C.M. Paine. Each reference lists the pages 133-134 as the source.
I have a copy of the book and the pages 133-134 refer to a prior naval engagement that took place on 7/25/1894 and only the Naniwa was present. The book does describe the Battle of the Yalu but only in general terms; not even the names of the ships involved are mentioned.
The writer may have cited the wrong source, but the source cited in each of the above articles is most assuredly incorrect.
I believe the book used to cite the claims is:
* 
I did not find the information in the book. I hope some editor can either verify that the information is in the source, identify a different source to support the claims, or remove the claims.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue regarding a source
Talk:Audio converter

message: Given our discussion above, should this article be restored to be a disambiguation page?  converted this disambig to a redirect. See discussion above for reasoning.  ~Kvng (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC statement

message: *Support - I believe WP:DISAMBIG allows a disambiguation page like this. I believe it was working fine as it was and this change is not an improvement. ~Kvng (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Best regards,Codename Lisa (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

text: * So are codec, analog-to-digital converter and digital-to-analog converter. They are about video and images too. And we have a policy. A simple lopsided poll that doesn't adhere to RfC standard is not allowed to violate a policy. —Codename Lisa (talk) 07:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: re . Please explain why Audio converter ("a device or software that converts an audio signal from one format to another") should not have a See also entry to Transcoding "the direct digital-to-digital conversion of one encoding to another, such as for ... audio files". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:07, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article already links to transcoding: "... an audio transcoder converts ...". Lambtron talk 17:42, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, you're right, sorry!  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit reversion
Talk:Hans Wegner

message: * According to the Royal Society of Art pages, he received his award in 1969, not 1959.  See List of Past Honorary Royal Designers DutchTreat 00:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Flame (Cheap Trick song)

message: The line, "I can't believe you're gone", seems to me to represent a jilted lover, rather than a couple in love.69.246.220.152 03:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't believe you're gone

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 19:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Talk:Japanese cruiser Itsukushima

message: A reader contacted Wikimedia via OTRS to report:
Each of the following pages in Wikipedia has the same error:
Japanese cruiser Matsushima
Japanese cruiser Itsukushima
Japanese cruiser Hasidate
Japanese cruiser Naniwa
Japanese cruiser Takachiho
Japanese  cruiser Yoshino
Each of these warships participated in the Battle of the Yalu fought on 9/17/1894. Each of the above Wikipedia articles gives specific details about the number of shells fired, and/or hits received. In each and every case the source of reference for those details is the same. The source is quoted as a book entitled "The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Powers and Primacy" by S.C.M. Paine. Each reference lists the pages 133-134 as the source.
I have a copy of the book and the pages 133-134 refer to a prior naval engagement that took place on 7/25/1894 and only the Naniwa was present. The book does describe the Battle of the Yalu but only in general terms; not even the names of the ships involved are mentioned.
The writer may have cited the wrong source, but the source cited in each of the above articles is most assuredly incorrect.
I believe the book used to cite the claims is:
* 
I did not find the information in the book. I hope some editor can either verify that the information is in the source, identify a different source to support the claims, or remove the claims.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:15, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue regarding a source 

message: I just wanted to say a quick thank you to the authors of this material. At present I am editing the early history of wireless telegraphy in Australia within History of broadcasting in Australia. The Japanese fleet visited Australia in mid 1903 and all ships in the fleet were equipped with Marconi wireless telegraphy. It adds much to the discussion to be able to link to this article here. Be aware there is much material about this visit in the Australian Trove Digitised Newspapers. Samuel.dellit (talk) 08:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for this article
Talk:Japanese cruiser Hashidate

message: A reader contacted Wikimedia via OTRS to report:
Each of the following pages in Wikipedia has the same error:
Japanese cruiser Matsushima
Japanese cruiser Itsukushima
Japanese cruiser Hashidate
Japanese cruiser Naniwa
Japanese cruiser Takachiho
Japanese  cruiser Yoshino
Each of these warships participated in the Battle of the Yalu fought on 9/17/1894. Each of the above Wikipedia articles gives specific details about the number of shells fired, and/or hits received. In each and every case the source of reference for those details is the same. The source is quoted as a book entitled "The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Powers and Primacy" by S.C.M. Paine. Each reference lists the pages 133-134 as the source.
I have a copy of the book and the pages 133-134 refer to a prior naval engagement that took place on 7/25/1894 and only the Naniwa was present. The book does describe the Battle of the Yalu but only in general terms; not even the names of the ships involved are mentioned.
The writer may have cited the wrong source, but the source cited in each of the above articles is most assuredly incorrect.
I believe the book used to cite the claims is:
* 
I did not find the information in the book. I hope some editor can either verify that the information is in the source, identify a different source to support the claims, or remove the claims.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue regarding a source
Talk:Claisen condensation

message: The mechanism image is not quite correct; the product is not protonated until the addition of acid. The product is more acidic than the starting material, so the regenerated alkoxide would deprotonate the product in preference to the starting material. The deprotonation is mechanistically important as it drives the reaction thermodynamically.
Agreed, the mechanism is not correct but it appears that it is taught this way a lot, all of the University/.edu web pages I looked through on a quick google search seemed to teach this oversimplified mechanism. I've found the complete/accurate mechanism in Solomons Organic Chemistry 6th edn from page 860 onwards. 
Meltyman (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the mechanism of the very similar Aldol condensation gives a good impression how it really works.--Stone (talk) 14:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate/Oversimplified Mechanism 

message: The reaction schemes all have a different font size. It would be nice if they were about the same size.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.131.34.24 (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires beautification 

message: This reaction is often also credited to a "J. G. Schmidt" (i.e. Claisen-Schmidt reaction).  This article makes no mention of this.
CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 15:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  J. G. Schmidt?  

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claisen_condensation#/media/File:Claisen_condensation_mech.png
This must be deleted ASAP, and must be replaced by the correct picture from the german wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.249.206.152 (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  this picture (posted by a user called thezookeeper in 2008) is simply ridiculously wrong 

message: female 2405:205:C900:AB64:8619:A98E:F605:A88E (talk) 18:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  claisen condensation 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jiewlord (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300