Talk:Sri Lankan state-sponsored colonization schemes

message: All the sources in this article (except for Library of Congress's country studies article and the article from Jaffna University Teacher's Association) are from pro-seperatist and political groups with extreme biases and disputed historical accuracy. 
Some of the words used in the article, such as "colonization" and "traditionally-Tamil lands" are controversial and are considered by some as "allegations". The casual use of such terms does not address or explain the politically sensitive nature of the controversy.  
The article also leaves out important sociopolitical and historical facts pertaining to the issue such as economic conditions of the country at the time, whether the resettled land had previously been occupied, the economic status of the settlers, etc.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Max Vohra (talk • contribs) 20:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Very biased and lacks factual, historical sources

message: I just came across this page, there is a lot of info here that will be helpful in expanding it. I will try to do so myself when I get a chance, but in the mean time here is the link http://www.atimes.com/ind-pak/CK17Df01.html
--Realstarslayer 19:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More Info to Expand Article

message: i think the preson should first check the dictionary and the read a couple of histocal books about our history..Well, iam highly interested to see the evidence for those traditionally tamil lands or tamil-homelands as they say.
thanks--Iwazaki 22:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  traditionally ?? 

message: The heartland of LTTE is the area around Mulative and Killinocchi..Ironically both these districts were newly created and government encouraged tamils who were living in densly areas in jaffna to settle there.Esp during the time of DS Senanayake this colonization took place,and as a result these districts became (more)inhabited.Editors of this article have left this part, also totally ignored the economic aspect of this decisions. I will add this information as soon as i get my details ready.
--Iwazaki 01:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mulative /Kilinocchi 

message: Some of the Tamils who live out side of Sri Lanka try to mislead the world with the word Traditional. Sri Lanka had it's own developed civilizations since 500BC. The kingdom of Rajarata (UNESCO World heritage site - whc.unesco.org/en/list/200/ ) ruled the Island more than 1700 years (543Bc to 1200). Where were those Traditional land owners in that era when Kingdom of Rajarata ruled Island from northern part ? Kingdom of Jafna start to exist when Tamil invader Kalinga Magha invaded and destroyed Kingdom of Rajarata in 1215 and hide from heavy vanni forest from Pollonnaruwa due to  native resistance started from Dambadeniya kingdom. Kingdom of Jafna established when Malik Kafur exiled last South Indian : Pandyan king in 1323 and annexed Madurai to powerful Dilhi Sultan administration. When 1323 Tamils too withdrawn from Vanni since they lost help from Pandyan. After losing Pandyan help Jafna Kingdom was very weak. After 100 years of establishment , in 1450 Sinhala King Parakramabahu6 invaded Jafna and re unified the Island. Then again it was exist another 125 years until Portuguese invaded in 1600. When British started Tamil Colonization in Vanni in 1905, Vanni was a vacant area. Now it has been a traditional Tamil land for some Tamils who live out side of Sri Lanka. This page is a joke. These people trying to spread a myth against a UNESCO world heritage site which ruled Northern part of Lanka over 1700 years(543BC-1215). Pandyan ruled Vanni for 100 years (1215-1323). It was ruled by Kingdom of Kandy for 200 years. British ruled Sri Lanka 150 years. It was under Sri Lankan government since 1948. . How long Jafna kingdom which exist 250 years ruled Vanni? --Himesh84 (talk) 06:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the Delete template but not sure what to do. The page is too biased and have too many Tamilnet Citations and Taminet is not reliable and only shows things strictly from the perspective of Pro-Ealam.Admins should take care of the rest...I guess UMDP (talk) 14:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Delete This page 

message: Facts in this article and many other articles related to Sri Lankan Tamils seem to be manipulated by pro tamil eealm diaspora members in an organized attempt. Seems to be part of their global campaign to mislead the world on the their socalled traditional lands. This lacks credibility and obviously written in a biased manner, highlighted ONLY THE FACTS showing discrimination towards Sri Lankan Tamils but intentionally hiding the separatist movements and the acts committed by those.
Navaka Navaratne   — Preceding undated comment added 03:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently, part of the global campaign supporting ltte terrorists 

message: Is the site TamilNet a trusted reference? --Lee (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a WP:RS.--obi2canibetalk contr 14:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TamilNet