lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Holstentor

message: The Roman never made it this far north! They stop at the Limes on the River Rhein! The Holstentor and the Wall was build by it citizen!
----
Itis a popular place to eat lunch when the weather is good. It may be appropiate to add that there isn't a snack bar or so in the Holstentor itself, just to prevent any misconceptions:) --gluon 03:20, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lubeck is such a beautiful place and Holstentor is awesome. If someone could translate the German article, it'd be awesome, it's a featured article and this english version deserves something better for this article. --Serte 23:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German translation

message: Can someone please figure out how to copy two images in the German Wiki site over to this English version? Most images could be copied and inserted without difficulty, but nothing seems to work for:
which I modified to:
and which should go in the "Surroundings" section near the end, 
and
miniatur|Erneuerte Terrakottaplatte mit lübschem Doppeladler 
which I modified to:
thumb|Restored terra-cotta tile with the Lübeck double-headed eagle 
and which should go in the "Ornamentation" section.
Thanks in advance for any assistance! (By the way, you will have to click on "edit this page" to see the coded version which has the error, whatever it is)
--Remotelysensed (talk) 11:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with images 

message: at this... --1970gemini 10:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  You may take a look
Talk:Hip hop culture

message: Just a thought, but is it known as Hip Hop or Hip Hop culture? I would hence merge Hip Hop culture into the article Hip Hop, rather than visa versa. Its developed from a music style to a culture, rather than the other way around, and we normally use the common term over anything else. I have no doubt that Hip Hop music and culture are now one thing, so the merger is a good idea. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.179.67 (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy?  Criticism?
Talk:Rapping

message: add about how hiphop influenced kpop and rap style in kpop, and idol reapper in korea to Derivatives and influence 14.52.120.38 (talk) 05:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 05:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2024 

message: — Assignment last updated by KING162 (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Hip Hop 50

message: Under the Golden Age heading, it mentions that period being from the mid 80's to early 90's, specifically ending around 1994.  However, this discludes many artists and albums that are typically apart of that 'Golden Era', including Tupac's album "All Eyez on Me", Nas' album "It Was Written", Busta Rhymes' debut album "The Coming", and Jay-Z's debut album "Reasonable Doubt", all released in 1996. These are artists and albums that are commonly considered apart of that "Golden Age" or "Golden Era" of Rap and Hip-Hop. That is why I think the period of "Golden Age" of Rap/Hip-Hop should go up to the year 1996 on this page.
Sites that also say the "Golden Era/Age" goes up to 1996:
 LoreDyl (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Age of Hip Hop
Talk:Pope Leo XIII

message: Shanedidona removed the use of the term bull, which derives from a Latin term and is not etymologically related to the other senses of the English word "bull"; thus not an insult.  I'm fixing to revert. --Jim Henry | Talk 22:39, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  term: Papal bull 

message: 'On February 20 1878, he was elected to succeed Pope Pius IX. His election was unusually quick, occuring on the exact day Pope Pius died. Thus, there was no sede vacante period between Pius IX and Leo XIII.'
This statement is downright incorrect. Pius IX expired on 7 February 1878. Mapple 18:40, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: I made a cross-reference, citing the NYT, that Leao died younger than Benedict XVI, the oldest pope (emeritus). But I do not know if I inserted it correctly . Someone can help me, revising it? Thank you so much 2804:D41:F80B:8B00:B9BC:7D15:5FA8:9DAE (talk) 21:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help me
Talk:Thai

message: Hmmmm. I don't believe Thai stick is imitation anything -- or any more or less legal than regular marijuana for that matter. Where did you get this information? 219.93.238.34 13:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai stick 

message: There are Lily Thai and Luci Thai. Are they really names or alias "Thai"? --Love Krittaya (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Using "Thai" for sex :-(
Talk:List of causes of human deaths by rate

message: This data is misleading because...
*AIDS can cause cancer
*diabetes can lead to heart attacks
*AIDS can assist tuberculosis
*neurological illness can cause traffic accidents
*obesity can cause diabetes, and diabetes may cause obesity
*obesity can cause heart problems
*obesity can cause acid reflux, which can cause cancer
*cancer can cause suicide
To what shall we credit the death? - 22:07, 28 Mar 2005 65.34.186.143
:Death certificates lists the immediate cause of death as well as the underlying cause of death which is the data used for mortality statistics.  See the External links of death certificate for more info. Petersam 07:25, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is all messed up. 

message: Would like link(s) or inline future estimates of big killers, eg. in 2020.Mike Linksvayer 20:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  future estimates 

message: Currently the article states that an unknown number of people die due to cellular aging. Well, the rest of the causes listed add up to 78 percent. So wouldn't it be a fair estimation to approximate it to, say, 20 percent? --ZeroOne 23:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Cellular aging" is not a cause of death which is listed in the WHO report.  It is not the same thing as "old age" and "old age" is not a cause of death.  Everyone is listed as dying of something in particular, such as an infection, cancer, or a particular type of organ failure. The numbers do not add up to 100% because not all causes have been listed. -- Beland 22:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cellular aging as a cause of death 

message: List of causes of death by rate does the same job but is much neater. EamonnPKeane 11:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and did the redirect. There is nothing really to merger into "List of causes of death by rate". The "List of causes of death by rate" article contains facts from the 2004 version of the same information as this one, thus it is more current.R00m c (talk) 00:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this page be a redirect?

message: Why is there a link to "pharmaceutical company" and an external link to adverse reactions to prescription drugs when they aren't on either list? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1.1.1 (talk) 04:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prescription drugs 

message: I see somebody wrote "excluding abortion and euthanasia" (As in : By disease, conditions (Excluding abortion and euthanasia) 1. Ischaemic heart disease 7,208,000 13%...) my intuition is that this is vandalism. Any thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.241.227.113 (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism?
Talk:Vladimir Vapnik

message: According to Google Scholar, Vapnik's h-index is 84 [1]. From where have you got that Vapnik's h-index is 115?
Rgarcialeiva (talk) 08:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  h-index 

message: I've noticed wikipedians calling every machine learning researcher a computer scientist even if they don't actually have any computer science training or background. I'm assuming these are written by laymen or computer science people who may or may not have ulterior motives.
The field of Machine Learning is not actually computer science. You would never be able to enter a graduate ML program with a CS background alone. Machine Learning historically began as a mathematical model of cognition. The field is more aptly described as a subfield of mathematical statistics, or applied mathematics. 
Laymen have this idea of ML as a CS field because CS departments have aggressively branded it as their own thing and recruited prominent researchers into their own departments, but their work is often very separate from the rest of the department. I suppose this has effectively created separate ML academia within CS departments with both faculty and students at this point, but I still think it is very misleading (and disingenuous) to call it CS, especially for aspiring ML scientists who may wrongly take up CS majors with no math background (the math is infinitely more important).
We should revise every ML researcher page. 38.98.171.24 (talk) 07:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professional title
Talk:Thao Ma

message: What is the Secret Army? -- Zoe 04:08, 13 April 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Where is this text from? Wisekwai 23:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference? 

message: Plagairized text, probably in violation of copyright, has been removed. Georgejdorner (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagairized text 

message: As I was unable to determine which, if any, of the generals opposed Thao Ma's abstention from opium smuggling are still living, I named no names given in the source material. Georgejdorner (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP rules respected 
Talk:Reanimation (Linkin Park album)

message: Reanimation should not be classified as a true studio album. It is simply a remix album. Hello2112 00:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? --SayCheese 21:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that is useful, relevent information. --Nerd42 (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why don't we just list the  BPM for every song on every album by Linkin Park? Bentu (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Studio album

message: Shouldn't the track titles be in all capitals? That's how it is on the reverse side of the case, and it looks much cleaner in all caps anyway. Plus it's easier to read, and you have to admit that it looks rather stupid in regular title case. Torvik 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track titles 

message: Do we REALLY need the BPM for each song... Titan50 (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BPM 

message: So, I'm editing it. Titan50 (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some idiot effed with the track list 

message: This looks pretty official; how about we use as our track list? Raifʻhār Doremítzwr (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  An official track list 

message: I want to look for a few sources saying this album is electro hop and just add this genre in the genre list. Is this ok? Or will it get deleted? The album has a lot of electronic rock styles as it says in the genre box, and in the Wiki page for electro hop it says electro hop has foundations from post-punk coming from electroclash. I say it is electro hop because the album has electronic music, hip hop, synths, and dance music in it. What do you guys think? Go or no? 71.104.253.11 (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 
Talk:Moxie

message: There seemed to be a lack of reasoning for why moxie declined... Maybe that could be explained more? Maybe due to an increase in competitors?
Cmaloney63 (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, it does taste like battery acid, so there's a place to start. --Herostratus (talk) 02:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasoning for a decline
Talk:Rosół

message: A user had posted this:
Full recipe anyone ?
in the article text.
I have moved it here. I do think that this article could benefit from a recipe, if someone would care to donate theirs.
The recipe is nice, but it looks like it's written a little too casually, especially where it begins with "so, on to the..."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.115.127.29 (talk) 18:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recipe 

message: should be "replacing..."--142.163.194.165 (talk) 20:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  substituting meat with oil
Talk:Head of state

message: I took the liberty of adding some additional absolute monarchies. Saudi Arabia actually isn't the only absolute monarchy. Something this doesn't mention, the head of state in the UAE is actually a head of a royal family and has absolute monarchy within his given state. Faith15 13:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: HEY! WHO TOOK MY EDITS DOWN?! Faith15 15:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Items 

message: There is a small typo in the first reference: Foakes, pp. 110–11 "[The head of state] being an embodiment of the State itself or representatitve of its international persona."
It says representatitve instead of representative. Please correct it. 85.152.246.66 (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo
Talk:United States presidential line of succession

message: 6	Secretary of Defense	Lloyd Austin		Unknown
7	Attorney General	Merrick Garland		Unknown
Change "Unknown" to "Democrat" HumanHistory314 (talk) 00:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2022
Talk:Sollentuna Municipality

message: Wouldn't it be interesting to know when the principality had a certain population?
Just a heads up: There's a flag on the politics section claiming the section is too focused on recent events. However, that section is 4 years out of date, so the flag looks out of place and may not be conveying its intended message well. 98.246.10.23 (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Quebec

message: Intro paragraph states Quebec is the largest province by area, yet details show it as 15.4% of Canada's area - 2nd to Nunavut's 20%. 73.209.120.91 (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Quebec is the largest province - Nunavut is a territory. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:55, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As non-Canadian the difference province / territory is not that obvious to me. So I have been bold and footnoted it with stating Nunavut being larger. Arnoutf (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest province

message: The redirect Lower Quebec has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Lower Quebec]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Not spelling the name of the province "Québec", with an accent aigu, is simply erroneous. I thought Wikipedia wasn't supposed to push errors as fact? LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: English spelling for English Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 00:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: English spelling is improper, whether this is the English Wikipedia or not. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Says you. Meters (talk) 01:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

text: This has been discussed before, and the article follows WP:CANFRENCH and MOS:CANADA Meters (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  English Wikipedia uses the common names found in English.  The French Wikipedia follows the same pattern, using the common names found in French.  For example, the articles on the French Wikipedia for Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and British Columbia all use the common French names, although none of those provinces are officially bilingual, and the English forms are used by the governments of those provinces:  Colombie-Britannique, Île-du-Prince-Édouard, Nouvelle-Écosse, and Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Piffle. I didn’t realize that the Wikipedia system would automatically redirect those French links to the equivalent English article. How do I insert links to the French articles that don’t get redirected? Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 17:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Like this: fr:Colombie-Britannique Indefatigable (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try:  fr:Colombie-Britannique, fr:Île-du-Prince-Édouard, fr:Nouvelle-Écosse, and fr:Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell is up with the missing accent?
Talk:Columbia University

message: Raney Aronson-Rath (JRN’95) - Academy Award-winning producer, 20 Days in Mariupol Tazz9999 (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please change Academy Award Winners to 34 

message: Take out the unofficially people's university for Palestine, it is not a real thing MegaSportsFan (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: — Please provide a source saying it is not a real thing. The current sources for it are articles from the Washington Examiner and Columbia Daily Spectator. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 17:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2024 

message: There is inconsistency about when to reference the date of the source inline for information in the infobox. It is present for money figures but not for headcounts. I, for one, think the reference links would be sufficient to provide that information, and suggest omitting it inline for all the data. Bsherr (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When to reference date of source inline in infobox 

message: Please add Union Theological Seminary to the list of the graduate/professional schools (And mention: affiliate, similar to Teachers College). The reference is Columbia University website: https://www.columbia.edu/content/academics/schools 
Thanks Tonyak3 (talk) 15:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charliehdb (talk) 10:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Million thanks Ramihan3 (talk) 06:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: was founded in 1836. However, it became affiliate with Colombia in 1926 (despite being independenm).I think that can be important to clarify. Ramihan3 (talk) 06:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2024 

message: Requires editing according to manuel to style. Removal of non-free material that is used improperly is also required. 64.189.18.29 (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2024
Talk:List of non-fiction writers

message: I don't see the purpose of this list.  Non-fiction is too diverse to be treated in this way.  We already have lists of historians, biographers, scientists, etc.  Non-fiction authors are usually specialists in a particular field, who happen to have written books on their specialism. Deb
:In that case, would it be worth making this a list of lists of historians, biographers, etc.? (Like List of fictional animals, only for non-fiction authors.) --Paul A 03:11 Apr 17, 2003 (UTC)
::You might want to check the updated (Lists of) Author (s) -- Docu 
::BTW not to be confused with Writer and List of novelists ;-)
No disrespect to anyone's efforts but this must be the daftest page I have seen on wikipedia by far.
:There are far worse.  However, I do agree that this one is not very useful. There must be thousands, if not millions, of people who have written non-fiction books.  What do I do with a name on the list?  If I already know about the person what good does the list do me? Redddogg (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One purpose of these lists is to help us take care of orphaned articles. So, if the subject of the orphaned article is a writer, just add his or her name to the appropriate list of writers. -- -- -- 06:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The page has had an average of 25 views a day over the last 90 days. I doubt if that's because the viewers wanted to see the daftest page on Wikipedia. Bmcln1 (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This page provides links to articles on non-fiction writers. In the case of Chinese & Japanese writers, the writer's name written in Chinese/Japanese characters is usually found in the article on that specific person. If you want to see the name written in Chinese/Japanese characters, simply click on the link provided. The Chinese/Japanese characters do not belong on this page. -- -- -- 22:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Does anyone else (besides Bmcln1) think that the non-English characters belong on this page? -- -- -- 19:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese/Japanese characters 

message: Part of the H–L appears in the editing mode but for me at least, does not display on the page itself. What's happened? How can it be fixed? Bmcln1 (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Part of section not showing!
Talk:Screenwriter

message: He only wrote two films after Blade Runner, neither of which were all that impressive. I would recommend his removal from this list as a notable screenwriter.  Any argument?? Herandar 03:50, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
:Yeah, I've moved the list so that it isn't quite so constrained by the apparently mystifying concepts expressed by "some" and "notable". --Mrwojo 00:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hampton Fancher??? 

message: Great informative article, needs references.  Theamazingspiderman20 (talk) 07:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Chus lo Faizan ahat (talk) 09:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lund mera 

message: This is essentially a dictionary definition and poorly sourced with an arbitrary (and dated) list of "records". Minimal amount of this is encyclopedic, and should just be merged into Screenwriter ZimZalaBim talk 04:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge per above. DMT Biscuit (talk) 23:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Screenwriter's salary]] into [[Screenwriter]]
Talk:George Abbott

message: My research suggests that George Abbott is the oldest person who has ever lived whose birth and death dates are known with accuracy, who was famous for reasons other than the fact of his great age.  Can anybody dispute this?  Cheers JackofOz 14:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Marjory Stoneman Douglas might beat him, if those birth and death dates are solid. She was partly for being old, but her book on the Everglades came out when she was in her fifties and she was in least known in environmental circles as early as her 70s. However I think he is the oldest confirmed entertainer.--T. Anthony 12:19, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Belated thanks for that info.  Very interesting. JackofOz 00:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Alphaeus Philemon Cole might also be up there although he isn't as known as those two. His art works are of some note it seems. Also to a much greater extent than those two his living 112 years is part of his fame.--T. Anthony 04:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks indeed. JackofOz 07:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some sort of record
Talk:Antoine Pinay

message: fr says, he was until December 23, 1952. --129.187.244.19 (talk) 11:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prime minister until 1953 ?