lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Iron Heel

message: How did this section survive this long; why is it here; and where is its source(s)? WildElf (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Analysis'' section - Entirely original research?

message: I assume from the context that the use of "immanent" was meant to be "imminent" (e.g. impending, soon), rather than "immanent" (e.g. subjective, existing within the mind, etc.). SchrödingersRoot 20:52, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo

message: If the book is from 1908, how can the cover say "Viva Allende"? 1ne 16:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That cover is from a much newer (re)printing of the novel. 4.159.113.151 04:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1st edition image now provided GrahamHardy (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: German students of English learn that "happy end" is not correct.
The correct form is: happy ending.217.251.180.195 (talk) 17:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the common idiom in english refering to a story's end is "happy ending". However happy end is nevertheless a grammatically correct form which is perfectly fine to be used as a general desctiption (of some end).--Kmhkmh (talk) 19:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly so. Both end and ending can be used as nouns. Although the original remark is on target. More common -- and probably preferable, as it's a gerund, implying action -- would be ending.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.143.101.163 (talk) 22:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  happy end ?  

message: "1906 – James Farley leads an Army of strike breakers from New York to San Francisco, to break a strike by street car men" -- the link as is refers to a political boss who would have been 18 at that time (based on his wikipedia article) and the guy's bio (again wikipedia) mentions nothing about it. If it's the same guy, it should be mentioned here and in his own article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.210.205.236 (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the correct James Farley? 

message: The first part of the article is pulled word for word from the Amazon synopsis of the book.  66.195.161.210 (talk) 12:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I pretty sure it's the other way around. If you check the article's history, you'll see that the lead slowly evolved from its first version, with a couple of fragments surving until today. The description published on Amazon on 16 April 2013 is identical to the lead version from the day before. The same text pops up on Google Books and AbeBooks.com. It seems that "CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform" plagiarized the article. Paradoctor (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Asgard(City). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Asgard(City)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:United States Marine Corps/Part of the Navy discussion

message: It's actually the department of the Navy and Marine Corps. The updated the seal some years ago  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:903:8201:1700:D522:BBBF:583B:553C (talk) 04:49, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

message: The source provided in this article  states the following:
SEC. 206. (a) [50 U.S.C. 409(b)] The term "Department of the Navy" as used in this Act shall be construed to mean the Department of the Navy at the seat of government; the headquarters, United States Marine Corps; the entire operating forces of the United States Navy, including naval aviation, and of the United States Marine Corps, including the reserve components of such forces all field activities, headquarters, forces, bases, installations, activities and functions under the control or supervision of the Department of the Navy; and the United States Coast Guard when operating as a part of the Navy pursuant to law.
This source describes the fact that the Marine Corps is under the Department of the Navy, but does not state that it is a separate branch.  We all know it is a separate branch, now let's find an actual source that states this.ndyguy (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That reference mentions Marine Corps multiple times.  It says the USMC is one of the Armed Forces, i.e. a separate branch or service. -Fnlayson (talk) 23:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, it does mention the Marine Corps multiple times.  However, in the citation given "SEC. 206. (a) [50 U.S.C. 409(b)]" it makes no reference to armed forces, branches, services, etc.  i.e. not in source. ndyguy (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

text: * Point.  I missed the section call out. The definations part lists it as an  "Armed Force". -Fnlayson (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While I think it's fairly asinine to need a ref for that (do we have to reference that grass is usually a shade of green?), I will say that there are a couple of refs at Talk:United States Marine Corps/Part of the Navy discussion that may be suitable to your view. Also, when this discussion section is to be archived, I intend to place it in that particular archive, since it runs in the same vein. bahamut0013wordsdeeds  05:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Thanks Fnlayson, I guess it does state that in the definitions section. And Bahumut, you're feelings aside, I challenged that fact because it is an important statement and per WP:BURDEN it therefore needs a source.  Not just a recycled source pointing to a section that doesn't support the fact, but the actual section that does support the fact.ndyguy (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  24April2009 Not in source
Talk:Minor chord

message: Can it be said that a minor chord is constructed upon a minor scale? --Nathanael Bar-Aur L. 23:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit confused 

message: Nobody has commented on the merge tag here and at major chord. I oppose a merge because I think it will be more confusing to link to a merged page. There is already a page that discusses both, as well as their diminished and augmented brethren, at Triad (music), but I think it is useful to have separate pages for each of those as well. Rigadoun  (talk) 20:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has mentioned it, I removed the tag. Rigadoun  (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: "The minor chord resembles the major chord except that it has a minor third with a major third on top, while a major chord has a major third with a minor third on top."
Articles on Quantum Mechanics are less convoluted then this one.
Bogger (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope! It depends entirely on the article. (try replacing minor third and major third with the variables A and B and reread the sentence) Would you like the sentence broken into shorten ones or are you saying it is confusing? Hyacinth (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WHAT???

message: I don't think that, "generally speaking, a minor chord is any chord which has a minor third above its root," is true. For instance, a diminished chord has a minor third above its root, but is not called a minor chord. See Talk:Major chord#Major third above root. Hyacinth (talk) 02:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor third above root

message: The symbol for a flat is not displaying properly on my machine. In the section that reads "which consists of the notes C (root), E♭ (minor third) and G (perfect fifth)", what I see immediately after the capital E is a little rectangle, not the musical symbol for a flat that looks like a lower-case "b". Actually this comment applies to all pages about music at wikipedia, and to the symbols for sharps, naturals, etc, when embedded within the text. I am using a machine with a fresh installation of Windows XP.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.77.147.116 (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Musical markup may be of assistance. Hyacinth (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbols not displaying in text

message: The explanation of the origin of the minor chord (and minor tonalities) is simply ridiculous.
This requires a physical explanation much more detailed and justified.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pef890 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the minor chord 

message: The notation in the caption for the Pythagorean chord is not correct. Shouldn't it simply be E? Burninthruthesky (talk) 09:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison of minor chords
Talk:Major chord

message: Let's agree to use wikistandard for writing about music and NOT use "b" for flat and "#" for sharp.
Oops! haha Failed to sign my comment. DChapii 19:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoiding "b" and "#" for writing about music 

message: See my comments on the proposed merge at Talk:Minor chord. Rigadoun  (talk) 20:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has mentioned it, I removed the tag. Rigadoun  (talk) 05:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:List of TCP and UDP port numbers

message: per https://support.eset.com/en/kb332-ports-and-addresses-required-to-use-your-eset-product-with-a-third-party-firewall  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.190.10.238 (talk) 01:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ESET is using TCP and UDP port 53535 

message: ArduinoOTA in ESP8266 uses port 8266 for over network sketch upload Parsa poorsh (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add ESP8266 port number
Talk:William Cobbett

message: Thanks 64.231.157.171, some great new material there. Jahs 20:40, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is true that Cobbett criticised  Jews, but he said the same things about Quakers. He said that the Jews were better than the Quakers, as some of the Jews  " do work."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.99.135 (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be helpful to get any reference at all for what Cobbett said about Jews and Quakers. At the moment, the horribly written lead states that Cobbett didn't like Jews. I am going to rewrite the lead, to clean it up and make it more comprehensible. Unless Cobbett's dislike for Jews is a defining aspect of his life's work (I read the article and don't find evidence of that; he disliked a lot of people and causes, and felt strongly about many things), I am going to remove and relocate the part about Jews. Cobbett seems to have a devoted following right up through the present day, so if there are any objections to my efforts to improve this article, please let's discuss them here.--FeralOink (talk) 07:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See "Rural Rides".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7996:B901:E861:18BA:D8FA:7EF2 (talk) 12:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Thus the Quaker gets rich" appears.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7996:B901:E861:18BA:D8FA:7EF2 (talk) 12:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See https://www.williamcobbett.co.uk/2020/07/29/cobbetts-attitude-to-race-and-slavery/ .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7996:B901:E861:18BA:D8FA:7EF2 (talk) 12:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :A Subaltern. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 16#A Subaltern until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A Subaltern" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The George Inn, Southwark

message: Man, this pub is crowded. ▫ Urbane Legend chinwag 01:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pub 

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:1995 Quebec referendum

message: It is true that the slogan of the "No" campaign signs translates to "we are right to say 'No'", but that is not the official translation that the "No" campaign used.  I tried to put in the official translation, but it was reverted.  Did the reverter do this simply because it was unsourced? --  Denelson83  22:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of "No" slogan
Talk:Czech lands: 1918-1992

message: "Czechia" is not a term used in the English language.  Could all of these articles be renamed to something meaningful in English? RickK 02:36, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Czechia

message: If this article is to avoid being merged with History of Czechoslovakia (or deleted altogether) it would have to change its focus to history that largely affected only the Czech lands, and not Slovakia. Please not that History of Slovakia has a section on Czechoslovakia, but no leaf article on Slovakia during that time period. - TheMightyQuill 21:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge

message: I'm removing :Image:Adolphus Duke of Cambridge Arms.svg from this article as the arms are depicted wrongly: cadet members of the House of Hanover used neither the Royal Crown on the inescutcheon of Hanover nor the smaller inescutcheon gules with the Crown of Charlemagne (as only the head of the House was Arch-Treasurer). Opera hat (talk) 10:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms 

message: Maybe one should mention that the Duke was quite in popular figure in his time. This was, amongst other things, due to the fact that he introduced a rather modern and liberal constitution (compared to the old one) with a parliament consisting, like the Houses of Parliament in the United Kingdom, of two houses. His popularity in Hanover was further increased because his successor as ruler of the independent Kingdom of Hanover (Ernest Augustus I of Hanover) exercised an autocratic rule that made many yearn for the good old days when Adolphus was Governor General or Viceroy respectively. The memory of the popular Duke lives on in a toast well-known in the Hanover region: "Pitsche, pitsche, pitsche, der Herzog von Cambridsche. Hei kümmt, hei kümmt, hei kümmt, ob hei noch einen nümmt? Hei nümmt noch einen ... na denn man prost! (Rough translation: Swig, swig, swig, the Duke of Camdridge. He comes, he comes, he comes, maybe he'd like another drink? He'd like another one ... well then, cheers!)" "Pitschen" in Low German translates as "to  swig" or "to booze". --91.19.103.16 (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity in Hanover 

message: The redirect First Duke of Cambridge has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  estar8806 (talk) ★ 14:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:First Duke of Cambridge]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:People's Union of Estonia

message: As to the name of the parliament of Estonia, see . Andres 06:12, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Actually this party is not considered nationalist in Estonia, it is more like a (left wing) populist party and its support consists mostly of elderly rural people discontent with the collapse of state financed farming system during the 1990s. Its leaders are mostly former collective farm managers (as our present president once used to be, too), which are not considered very nationalist people, as they were engaged to Soviet management during the years of Communism (Arnold Rüütel was the Chairman of the Presidium of Supreme Soviet of ESSR beginning with Andropov era). People who were considered nationalists were (and most of them label themselves even now) those people who used to be dissidents during the Soviet occupation or lead the more radical wing of independence movement during the late 1980s and the beginning of 1990s. Fatherland Union represents those people. As People's Union rejects the idea of introducing European common currency Euro in Estonia soon, I suggest calling the party Eurosceptic. Constanz 15:36, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: People's Union ideology
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage/Archive 1

message: Why is the order included on some titles (XXXX, 2nd Duke of XXXX) and not for others (XXXX, Duke of XXXX).
Does Earl of Hopetoun need to be moved? [EDIT: It was moved a minute after I posted this.]
--Jiang 05:54, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple questions 

message: For multiple peerages of the same rank, what should be the rule?  My general principle has been that if someone has the same ordinal for both peerages, use both, as Charles Lennox, 3rd Duke of Richmond and Lennox, but if they have different ordinals for their different peerages, to just use the senior one, as Thomas Herbert, 8th Earl of Pembroke, rather than Thomas Herbert, 8th Earl of Pembroke, 5th Earl of Montgomery (which is awkward), or Thomas Herbert, 8th Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery (which is incorrect.)  Other opinions on this? john 00:35, 20 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Peerages of the Same Rank
Talk:Sun Li-jen

message: Note: contact information have been altered to preserve privacy.
:Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004
:From: "Chung Chieh" 
:To: Ktsquare
:Subject: Re: Inconsistency of information and acquiring permission for Wikipedia
See below please,
You have permission to use the contents in my website for information.
Your interest in this matter is very encouraging. A lot needs to be 
done, and I might start soon.
:[:) - = - = - {:)
:Chung Chieh
:Professor,
:Chemistry Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo,
-- Ktsquare (talk) 05:18, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission for using *[http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/sun/ Dedication to The Late General Sun Li Jen, designed by his foster son Chieh Chung].

message: " China was in the middle of civil war, and Soviet and Japanese invaders seemed poised to devour China."
In 1924 Russia had much more serious problems than invading China, some parts of it's territory were still ocupied by Japan.
Please, add proofs to this sentence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.252.16 (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politically biased.
Talk:Resident commissioner of Puerto Rico/To Do

message: * Merge US Congress Representatives from Puerto Rico with Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico; use the latter as main article.
=== Discussion ===
:Copied from Talk:U.S._Congressional_Delegations_from_Puerto_Rico: "For the purposes of uniformity, I don't think we should eliminate<EDIT: Or simply redirect> this page in favor of the "Resident Commissioner" article[1]. I'm usually not a big fan of redundancy, but to a certain degree, it seems both pages have their place. It is certainly worthy of note that Puerto Rico has a very different, governmentally recognized title for their delegates, but I think an explanatory phrase and a prominent reference(link) to information about that difference makes more sense than eliminating the "delegate" page altogether. ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 16:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge duplicate articles 

message: :Copied from Talk:U.S._Congressional_Delegations_from_Puerto_Rico: "For the purposes of uniformity, I don't think we should eliminate<EDIT: Or simply redirect> this page in favor of the "Resident Commissioner" article[1]. I'm usually not a big fan of redundancy, but to a certain degree, it seems both pages have their place. It is certainly worthy of note that Puerto Rico has a very different, governmentally recognized title for their delegates, but I think an explanatory phrase and a prominent reference(link) to information about that difference makes more sense than eliminating the "delegate" page altogether. ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 16:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Nervous system

message: Apply talking mode 197.184.178.69 (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetraplegia 

message: Can someone smarter than me add at the beginning of the article: "This article is about the nervous systems of tetrapods. For the nervous systems of other animals, see Evolution of nervous systems." I keep trying, but I screw up the formatting. Thanks! Edgar Vekilnik, Jr. (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Edgar - the article is about the nervous system in general. Paragraph 4 of the lead and a whole section "Comparative anatomy and evolution" addresses other organisms. Iztwoz (talk) 16:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Nervous systems- requested edit

message: "The PNS is divided into three separate subsystems, the somatic, autonomic, and enteric nervous systems." The autonomic nervous system contains the enteric nervous system, so they cannot be called separate subsystems.  The PNS Wikipedia page is consistent with this as well. Would anyone take issue with it being changed to "The PNS is divided into two separate subsystems, the somatic and autonomic nervous systems."? Reasoned Inquiry (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Reasoned Inquiry done. Someone must have confused PNS with ANS. Tobiasi0 (talk) 06:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enteric not separate 

message: Hello together 
I've identified two similar images that could potentially be suitable for the infobox of this article. The first one is the current :File:TE-Nervous system diagram.svg (1), and the other is :File:Nervous system diagram-en.svg (2). Personally, I'm still unsure which one is more suitable – number 2 shows the body from the anterior view, while number 1 depicts it from the posterior view. Number 2 is more detailed, but perhaps a little too detailed? They both depict the nervous system quite clear, but let me know what you think. Tobiasi0 (talk) 07:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:Spitalul de Urgență

message: "Fie pâinea cât de rea 
Chiar aici in ţara ta 
Tot ţi-o fură cineva."
I was always under impresion that the real meaning of those lyrics (actualy an old expresion) was more like :
"However bad the bread may be 
Even here in your (own) country
Someone will steal it all from you"
In Joe Mabel's translation the accent is on local criminality, in my translation the accent is on external attacks (reference to Romania history). Maybe I am too much into history, but it could be understood in both ways.
MihaiC
Mihai, you're the native speaker, not I. From my more limited knowledge of the language, I believe that it can be read either way, and it's likely that as a native you are more likely to know which meaning is traditionally understood. Maybe the article whould switch over to your translation, maybe it should offer both. I'm comfortable with either solution. Feel free to edit accordingly. -- Jmabel 23:10, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: : Some of these requests for citation strike me as a bit odd: there are few matters of opinion here. I don't have an independent citation for "bitter wit that does not lend itself to easy translation"; if HQCentral wants that removed, he may do so, though I hardly see how it will be a gain. The relevant phrase "Foaie verde…" is contained in the lyrics already quoted, so I can't imagine what would be additional citation for that. I will cite for the phrase being traditional, though.
: As I say, the rest of this I will cite for; basically this can be documented either from the song lyrics themselves or from the album notes. I will make that explicit, but I believe that for music articles in general, except in matters of opinion, we do not usually cite for such things. - Jmabel | Talk 04:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requests for citation