Talk:Prince Edward Viaduct

message: I didn't believe that the Bloor Viaduct had 5 traffic lanes until I tracked down some Flicker photos:
Looking west at eastbound traffic
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chuckkahn/94839624/
Heading east
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chuckkahn/94813242/
Looking east at westbound traffic
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chuckkahn/94919943/
Heading west
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chuckkahn/165367966/
Not sure if using Flickr/ShutterFly/etc. photos is acceptable in wikipedia.
Hughdbrown (talk) 02:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Traffic lanes

message: I do not believe the statement about Zero (0) suicides since the installation of the barrier is entirely correct. I would like to see a reference to support that claim as it sounds like speculation. Suicides go generally un-reported and therefore it would be difficult to prove either way, however someone i know who works in field of emergency services has told me that there have been at least 2 that he is aware of since the barrier has been installed (There is no official way of confirming or denying these claims so i will not include them in the article). --Eja2k (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide/Luminous Veil 

message: Here are some public domain photos of the viaduct construction, for someone who has the time to upload them: http://www.flickr.com/photos/43021516@N06/tags/bloorstreetviaduct/ --Padraic 19:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: I removed the tags proposing a merger of Luminous Veil into this article.  If someone wants to put the tags back in, feel free, but please link to a proper section in Luminous Veil's talk page. Or just do the merge if you feel strongly about it. Ivanvector (talk) 15:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge From [[Luminous Veil]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Prince Edward Viaduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061214052645/http://www.nowtoronto.com:80/issues/2003-05-08/news_insight.php to http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2003-05-08/news_insight.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061214052645/http://www.nowtoronto.com:80/issues/2003-05-08/news_insight.php to http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2003-05-08/news_insight.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Prince Edward Viaduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-30-goldengate-suicides_x.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2003-01-13/news/0301130268_1_viaduct-birney-bridge
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090731082137/http://www.eopa.ca/newsletters/DialogueNL.June2001.pdf to http://www.eopa.ca/newsletters/DialogueNL.June2001.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The vintage diagram included in the article references a "Bloor Section" that included further bridge spans, but the article lead says that the third phase is the Sherbourne Phase that is an embankment. There certainly doesn't appear to be a bridge today where the 'Bloor Section' is diagrammed to be. Was that an original plan that was modified into an embankment? Can anyone clarify? TheHYPO (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This source had some info.  Magnolia677 (talk) 20:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third phase?