lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charismatic megafauna

message: Created this page from information deleted from Megafauna some time ago. It didn't make sense for this to redirect to a non-existent section, and I think this is a sufficiently different concept as to deserve its own article. The way, the truth, and the light 23:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From where and when did the term "Charismatic megafauna" arise?  I recall one of my profs using the phrase back in the early '90s.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.139.102 (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the term? 

message: Yeah, I wouldn't exactly call penguins or bald eagles "megafauna". They're little. But they're being called megafauna because of the size of their charisma, not the size of their body, because the conversation of species in general needs to be marketed and this is a marketing technique? I think this is an important elephant (lol) in the room to address. I hovered my mouse over this article link from another Wiki page and saw that they were calling bald eagles megafauna over here. I was bewildered. I wanna know more about this.
YelloJello33
:Responding to: . Megafauna does not refer to the size of species' charisma. A recent article by Moleón et al. (2020) clarifies what megafauna are https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.2643 . Body size is a crucial criteria, though not always sufficient. They suggest a functional definition of megafauna: "the subset of animals among the largest in size that have consistently strong effects on the structure or functioning of a community or an ecosystem." In that definition, penguins or bald eagles can be megafauna because they are among the largest animals within the local animal community, and they disproportionately affect their environment.85.191.78.45 (talk) 09:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hear Hear about where does the name come from 

message: :
Are other tigers and other lions less charismatic?  Is the general public (which, I imagine, defines "charismatic") even aware of a distinction? —Tamfang (talk) 19:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about other lions and tigers?
Wikipedia talk:Coatrack articles

message: In the All about George section, the essay states "perhaps George Washington did own slaves at the time, nonetheless, it presents it in a negative, non-neutral point-of-view". This suggests that slavery shouldn't be presented in a negative way, which I don't think is supported by WP:NPOV. Perhaps we can reword the section? Pburka (talk) 22:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ,  Discussions on whether a crime against humanity (slavery) can be excused by its historical context have a tendency to become very long and emotional. So the expression that slavery "was the norm at the time" causes just another POV-problem. It also distracts the reader from the subject of the article, causing him to think about all the implications of slavery. So I'd suggest something like "George Washington did own slaves, but that fact is presented in a way intended to evoke a strong emotional reaction in the reader". Rsk6400 (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  All about George 

message: At the very end of the The Flea example as on 03 Jan 2019 it says
: it may be appropriate move to it a more relevant article
Shouldn't “to” and “it” be swapped? --CiaPan (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes (but "to move it to"), please edit the essay. Johnuniq (talk) 22:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done: Special:Diff/876702696. Thank you, . :) --CiaPan (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to it, or move it to? 

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_2015_undercover_videos_controversy#/talk/8#/talk/8
I'd love some comments on this. Maybe I misunderstand the Wikipedia policies, but at least some of the content seems relevant. natemup (talk) 16:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. I can't see what this Wikipedia talk has to do with the linked controversy article. 2. The link seems broken. Did you mean the article itself (Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy) or its talk page (Talk:Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy) or may be some specific section of one of those? --CiaPan (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on content concerning illegal fetal tissue dealers 

message: Hi,
Request for comment discussion has been initiated @ Talk:List of former Muslims#Rfc: Soft censoring of Ex-Muslim Articles and has reference to this article there in.
Those interested can express their views there in.  
Thanks
Bookku (talk) 09:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rfc: Soft censoring of Ex-Muslim Articles 

message: I think this section needs to be clarified. Sometimes a person may be notable for propagating an outrageous conspiracy, and then the conspiracy theory will be described in the article. For example, Léon de Poncins and Renaud Camus. I think the point is that it has to be relevant to their article, but there is no text describing this.2601:640:4000:3170:85DF:1B78:7BA6:1B2C (talk) 16:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Attempted to clarify, but even then I am not sure how to clarify further. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 06:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Journalist Mentioned It in Passing
Talk:Finite-rank operator

message: Finite rank do not imply boundeness. It must be required by definition. For a counter-example, take X\, an infinite dimensional Banach space. By the axiom of choice, there is an unbounded linear funtional l:X\to\mathbb{R}\,. Define T:X\to X\, as Tx= l(x) y\,, where 0\neq y \in X\,.Lechatjaune 23:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Azuran

message: User:Azuran
      run at Wed May 23 23:29:17 2007 GMT
Image:	21
Mainspace	3036
Talk:	8
Template:	16
User talk:	2
User:	49
Wikipedia:	12
avg edits per page	5.48
earliest	16:28, 23 June 2006
number of unique pages	574
total	3144
2006/6 	156 	
2006/7 	363 	
2006/8 	43 	
2006/9 	33 	
2006/10 	233 	
2006/11 	101 	
2006/12 	177 	
2007/1 	343 	
2007/2 	393 	
2007/3 	730 	
2007/4 	348 	
2007/5 	224 
Azuran's editcount summary stats as of 23:29, May 23 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 23:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
File talk:Matisyahu - Youth.jpg

message: Per WP:FUC criterion 10a this image needs: "Proper attribution of the source of the material, and attribution of the copyright holder if different from the source"
Who is the copyright holder and why are they not getting attribution? (H) 23:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. The source isn't the web site the cover was copied from, nor is it "my scanner", the source is the publisher of the album. Addhoc 00:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What the hell is going on here?  It doesn't make any difference which web site this was downloaded from, the copyright holder is the same. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 00:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

text: If "source" is the copyright holder, then why are uploaders supposed to give it? Also, isn't this image considerably too big and high-quality for the fair-use conditions? --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 18:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Providing source information is a courtesy. It helps others verify the authenticity of the image and confirm the copyright status. The assertion that this image is too high-quality to satisfy Wikipedia policy is not necessarily correct. Online retailers and reviewers use album covers for the same reason, and in compliance with the same fair use limitations, as Wikipedia. There is no hard-coded limit on the resolution of fair use images and 500px rez is still far below any reasonable requirement for high-quality commercial use. That said, some editors go by an unwritten guideline to limit all fair use images to 300px horizontal rez. The effort required to downsample this image is trivial, so this concern is easy to address. The greater issue is, why waste time arguing over one reasonably-sourced album cover when there are thousands of completely unjustified, possibly fake images uploaded under the same tag? A standardization of the upload and verification process might limit such debates. The copyright to almost all album cover art is owned either by the record company, musician, or illustrator, and the fair use rationale for all album covers is nearly identical. Lets try to set up a review system whereby editors are instructed to find a duplicate of the cover from a reliable source (e.g. Amazon) and append a pre-selected rationale based on current image use. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 08:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Stranahan High School

message: I would like to know why sports stars are "notable alumni" but alumni who graduated from the school and now teach there are not notable.  This is a school.  I would think academic achievement would be as "notable" as being able to carry a football.  If I list all the doctors and lawyers who have graduated from Stranahan, will they be as unworthy of recognition?
:Perhaps you aren't clear on what constitutes as being notable. Notable alumni are considered people of recognizable status, such as sports stars or celebrities. Teachers and doctors are not considered notable to WP's guidelines. Also, please remember to sign your posts, using four tildes. Legendotphoenix 15:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni

message: Please stop adding Stranahan's Engineering Program to this article. You may add to the article if you can find something relevent, but what you all have put on there so far is how great you are. You are NOT recognized around the country, and Stranahan's cirriculum should NOT be mentioned. Thank you. Legendotphoenix 12:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stranahan Engineering

message: I added a category - the extra-curricular list from the school's website, minus a few items which currently don't exist. Anonymous~Source 12:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra curricular

message: I completely removed the section until a source is found. Anonymous~Source 12:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a link that I can add to the article? Anonymous~Source 22:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, but your lack of a response has led me to delete the section. You need to find a legitimate source for that. Anonymous~Source 00:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Integration and Segregation
Talk:Weakling

message: Weakling is also a term used to define a weak person/thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.99.45.154 (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite. But Wikipedia is not a dictionary; see WP:NOT. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: theres some more information available in the german article (I think), somebody who speaks both languages better may want to translate something of it. 89.50.186.226 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition 

message: A disambiguation to the word weakling (since there is no article on it) should be included in this article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation needed urgently
Talk:Golden (band)

message: If someone with a wikipedia account wants to change this, Phil Manley did not play bass in golden, he played guitar. Alex Minoff was the bassist of Golden, and later the guitarist of Extra Golden. -Shawn Phase 141.157.77.198 (talk) 15:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Children of Men/Archive 5

message: I'll put in the request for Peer Review this evening, unless Viri has already done so. Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you fellas were too busy biting each other's heads off, I've put the article up for peer review. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 17:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:Blatz (band)

message: Why is this this article slated for deletion?  Blatz is a notable and important Bay Area punk band.  The quality of the article/citation may need improvement, but that is no reason for outright deletion.  I'll be removing the deletion flag until valid evidence can be presented.  - Nightsoil  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightsoil (talk • contribs) 23:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Naxos (Sicily)

message: * The paragraph about the site of Naxos is quite wrong concerning the remains. It says "there are now no extant remains of the ancient city". Indeed there has been quite some archaeological studies and excavations made since 1854 and the publication of the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography. This resource is probably well documentated and usable (with caution) for the historical part, however for the actual state of the site it cannot be considered as a suitable source. 
** A good book about the Greeks in Sicily The Greek Cities of Magna Graecia and Sicily --LeZibou 09:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the site
Talk:Joel Hanson

message: I can find no secondary source confirming the supposed co-writers for "Captured", so I am going to revert the edits for the time being. Jmjanssen 00:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joe Kilroy

message: This article makes it look like Joe's only claim to fame is as an NRL player. I was surprised to discover it contains no reference at all to his incarceration for drug-related offenses. This is one of many online sources of this information:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/680035/NRLs-criminal-team-of-the-century  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete3194 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incarceration
Talk:Saint Thomas More High School (Milwaukee)

message: Can someone edit  as per WP:INFOBOXFLAG
74.12.71.15 (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Jackmcbarn (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you74.12.71.15 (talk) 02:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 January 2014 

message: The school was a charter member of the Metro Classic Conference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Splinter 9 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athletics 

message: Change President Mark Joerres to President Mary McIntosh
Change Enrollment 445 to Enrollment 530
Change Faculty 29 to Faculty 40
In the Athletics Section, change Woodland Conference to Metro Classic Conference Putneyk (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. qwerty6811 :-) (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2018
Talk:HD

message: its reasonable enough
:Reject Too many different uses across too many different categories and disciplines. -- Yamara 15:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reject HD should remain a dis page. Magioladitis 07:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Reject This is definitely a disambig page. Cmcnicoll 07:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Reject ditto (I still automatically think 'hard disk' for instance) --AlisonW 13:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ps. if you don't even sign your suggestion you can't have much confidence in it! --AlisonW 13:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: How many of these things are actually ever referred to as "HD" as opposed to those that just happen to have those as initials? Has anyone ever called Humpty Dumpty "HD"? If not, then it should be removed. Same with all sorts of other questionable entries. -R. fiend (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion

message: Hello. What is "HD Consultant"? --Qdinar (talk) 11:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: now i know that HD is Human Development... and: "JOB DESCRIPTION: HD Consultants provide operational services; program and strategy design, development, and customization; Agency policy development and implementation; organizational design and change management; and/or strategic/tactical human resources advice to customers of the Agency's HD programs. Customers include employees, managers, senior leaders, and related stakeholders." these are from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:VM3Px_zhwyYJ:federalgovernmentjobs.us/jobs/Hd-Consultant-2333040.html+HD+Consultant&cd=4&hl=tt&ct=clnk&client=firefox&source=www.google.com --Qdinar (talk) 11:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "HD Consultant"?
Talk:Harrell Fletcher

message: There have been a series of uncited, unsourced statements and since this is a BLP that have been tagged since October 2016. The uncited information was moved to the talk page today, please do not move back until sources are found, see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Possible history of COI edits on this article. Jooojay (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of unsourced statements
Template talk:Indian Department of Space

message: The list of articles appearing on this template seems to be taking on observatories as well. Perhaps a new section on Observatories could be opened or a similar template for Indian Astronomy could be made. Prad2609 (talk) 12:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The template needs to include amateur radio satellites like HAMSAT and IMS-1 and reconnaissance satellites like RISAT-1 and RISAT-2. For reconnaissance CARTOSAT-2A has also been reported a ministry of defence mission so it should also be part of reconnaissance satellitesAbhishekmathur (talk) 00:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As a followup, Satellite construction facilities(Contractors) like Vikram Sarabhai Space Center,Liquid Propulsion Systems Centre also need to be included.Abhishekmathur (talk) 00:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Request for Amateur Radio and Reconnaissance
Talk:Festival Foods

message: This page seemed to largely be taken from the company's website's "About Us" page, so I reduced it to the essential information in an attempt to make it more NPOV. There were also no links on the page, so I added a few of these where it seemed obvious to do so. I'm going to retain the advert tag, but if someone else comes across it and decides it is no longer needed I encourage them to remove it.
I want to mention though that User:TurnerJQ (who seems to have made most of the edits I just revised) has, in a previous edit to the page, requested that editors of this page contact them at what appears to be a Festival Foods company email address. (This edit was reverted by a vandalism bot.) I'm pretty sure their edits were thus a blatant violation of WP:COI.--BlackAndy (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2011
Talk:Eraclea

message: As fascinating as this locality might be (and it is), I don't think this is the right place for  commercial advertising. 
The last few sentences are (well, were) just that.
: Agreed: 'Cuddled by soft sand' not only sounds daft, but also auto-translated.1812ahill (talk) 23:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO ADS, PLEASE
Talk:Enja Records

message: Album missed "dialogues" (ENJ9684) luciano biondini / stefano maurizi / mirco mariottini 77.32.63.15 (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album missed "dialogues" luciano biondini / stefano maurizi / mirco mariottini
Talk:List of results of the Australian national rugby league team

message: The second and third Tests in 1997 were on 8 and 16 Nov, not as you've got them. Various sources agree, including the match reports in The Guardian.
All the best,
Cris Freddi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.193.152 (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do these stay or go (in reference to the 2020 Kangaroo Tour)? WDM10 (talk) 08:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled matches 

message: The table at the top of the article listing the overall results versus each team seems to contain errors. For example, the table says that in matches against England Australia have 16 wins, 7 losses and 2 draws. However, adding up the individual results listed on this page in games against England produces totals of 16 wins, 3 losses and 1 draw. 79.70.49.170 (talk) 12:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall results table errors
Talk:HMCS Long Branch

message: Have you considered using the article's associated talk pages for discussion?
You commented out an image on the HMCS Long Branch (K487) article.  
Most Flower class corvettes were scrapped soon after World War 2.  There
are hardly any free images of these vessels.  If we had an image of the Long Branch, we would use it.
But, since we don't I don't understand your objection to using an image of a sister ship.
May I suggest it would be less confrontational, and keep other people's wikistress lower, if you put your questions, and other discussions, on the article's talk page?
Cheers!  Geo Swan 00:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hands up... I tried to check whether HMS Milfoil was a Flower class corvette and incorrectly concluded that it was not. I suggest the caption should refer to the image being a sister ship. Welsh 12:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ulster Hospital

message: The name of the line manager should not be included per WP:BLPNAME. There is no loss of context by not including it. While they include the name of the vicim news articles do not include the name of the line manager, see for example this, this, this and this. The sentence from the policy reading "Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value" cannot really be argued with, the inclusion of the ine manager's name adds no value at all. FDW777 (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Industrial tribunal