lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frankenstein Unbound

message: Perhaps this article should note that the full title of Mary Shelly's book is Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus and that her husband, Percy, wrote a play called Prometheus Unbound.  This seems too neat to be a coincidence.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.3.229 (talk) 14:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary Allusion 

message: This article is missing a lot of important information on the film including information on the film's production and reception. This information notable critics reviews on the film should be added to the article in order to completely cover its subject.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Command & Conquer: Tiberian Twilight

message: This article is definately not neutral, and some of the information needs to be proven before allowed to remain on this page.
----
This article says the Red Alert 3 is the next game in devolopment. Reading the article on Tiberian Sun, it says RA3 was canceled in favor or Tiberian Twilight (in the Renegade 2 section).  I'm not being a stickler, but where is this shotty info coming from? - Ghostalker
:All of this info is mostly just recycled rumors and speculation off the internet. C&C3 development rumors are somwhat backed up by the fact that EA games has yet to provide a solid, non-skeptical reason for why Mark Skaggs is Missing In Action, and by the percieved RTS C&C fans backlash at the announcement of RA3 being next in the development line. TomStar81 03:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Isle of the Dead

message: I feel that if the graphic novel and film based on the painting are here, there should be a link to the novel as well (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isle_of_the_Dead_%28novel%29). Too much of a noob to know how to do that though. MrBananaGrabber 06:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Zelazny Novel needed 

message: The sections are short, but maybe "Isle of the Dead" should be made into a DA page, since I know one other thing with this name: an old 1993 DOS game. I hope the admins won't mind if I tag it... --Eridani 19:10, 22 January 2007 (EST)
:Done. Please help by cleaning up all related articles and citing sources. ALTON .ıl 06:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page?

message: Unlike Rachmaninoff's more famous work, Reger's piece probably does not deserve its own Wikipedia entry, but it could mentioned in the page on Max Reger and a link could go on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewOram (talk • contribs) 21:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: include Max Reger's tone poem
Talk:The House of Rothschild

message: As the film was released in the year after Hitler took power in Germany, I wonder was there an intention on the part of the directors to portray the anti-semitic policies of the Nazis in Germany, rather in the way Charlie Chaplin as director and leading actor intended his "The Great Dictator" to be a satirical portrayal of Hitler and the Nazi regime? The pogroms in Germany provoked by Ledrantz (a fictional character invented for the movie) appear to foreshadow what the Nazis were doing to Jews in Germany in the 1930s.Cloptonson (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have discovered an online article from The Forward, the US Yiddish journal, dated 2014 when it was being televised in the US, and titled 'Hollywood's Most Misunderstood and Forgotten Jewish Movie Returns', which shows that Zanuck (not Jewish) intended this film and produced it, against all opposition, as a warning on the dangers of resurgent anti-semitism exemplified in Germany. I will introduce it into this page.Cloptonson (talk) 05:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Intended political message?

message: I have introduced into 'Reception' summary detail of coverage in US journals with an example from Time, cited to The Record's article but it would be interesting, considering the focus on Nathan Mayer Rothschild and Britain, if examples of reception from British journals could be mentioned, remembering he had then (and still has) descendants living in the UK.Cloptonson (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Press coverage
Talk:The Black Camel

message: Maybe the film template in this talk page should be removed since the film has it's own article--tired time (talk) 13:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Film template
Talk:Night Monster

message: Is it worth noting that the phrase "night monster" also appears in the Bible (Isiah 34:14)?  The Good News Bible describes it as "a female demon, believed to live in desolate places".  RobbieG 21:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lacking a quote from whoever coined the title, it would be a leap to make a connection. The 1611 King James Version Is34:14 has "screech owl"; the Thomas Nelson New KJV translates "night creature". Not sure it was succubus. -- Naaman Brown (talk) 16:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible
Talk:The Black Sleep

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: A trailer exists with this title, but still doesn't mean it actually was released with this title. 2001:56A:FA85:3800:49F1:D893:7D22:2A8D (talk) 22:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. Cadman's Secret
Talk:Eegah

message: The "gross revenue" figure - which appears to be unsourced - implies that the film was a financial disaster. However I am sure I remember reading that the film was a minor popular hit at the time, earning back its money several times over (e.g. this review, which is also unsourced). The IMDB lists a budget of $15,000 but no revenue figures. Where does the box office data come from? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profit 
Talk:J. D.'s Revenge

message: Some information on the film's production would be nice.--Paleface Jack (talk) 03:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: Hi all,
Is there any reason for the space before the 'D'? All information and pictures of the movie (covers, posters,...) seem to write J.D.'s Revenge or J.D.'S REVENGE. This article seems to be the only place where that space is used, as far as I can see from the very start of the article as a one-liner. Should the article be renamed? Thanks for answering, RonnieV (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:The Crippled Masters

message: The DVD of the movie comes with some information on the two main actors and their real-life disabilities, indicating that Frankie Sum (Lee Ho) was a thalidomide baby and Jackie Conn’s crippled legs were caused by a developmental problem during pregnancy. Is there a good place to indicate that in the article?
-72.95.234.101 (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  RL Actor disabilities 
Talk:Attack of the Crab Monsters

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Riley doesn't go to that page. It goes to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Tattoo. There is no page for Robin Riley. His IMDB page is here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0727160/
If you block wikipedia's internal redirect it goes here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robin_Riley&redirect=no
66.176.38.158 (talk) 20:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin Riley cast member link is misdirected. 
Talk:Not of This Earth (1957 film)

message: Before anyone asks for sources on the info regarding the 71 minute version: I personally owned at least 2 VHS videos and 2 DVDs, transferred from 16 mm and distributed by companies selling public domain films. All these versions ran 71 mins. and included the mentioned twice inserted scenes. I'm pretty sure this version still appears on TV and in PD company ads. I could give company names, but I won't. This is less because I don't endorse selling PD films (which I find understandable as long as these films are not available in any other form) but because the quality was so annoyingly low. Get one of the official versions!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Kerber (talk • contribs) 17:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Production notes

message: I'll rewrite the plot section when I find the time. This film deserves better treatment than the existing entry. Done! --Robert Kerber (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:The Wild Women of Wongo

message: fixed the articles style, and removed the following as unreferenced. i will try to add it back in if i can find a ref:
Miami filmmaker (New Walden, Changing Faces, Voice of the Camera) Bruce Merwin was set to remake Wild Women of Wongo at the locations Wild Women of Wongo was originally filmed when The Film Crew, a group of MST3K alumni Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett, released a riffed version of the movie on DVD on September 11, 2007 through Shout! Factory.
This riffed version made it impossible for Merwin to receive a copyright for the film script Merwin sent in to the US copyright office. "Riffing Wild Women of Wongo must have been lots of fun and I trust provided deep satisfaction for Michael J. Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett. It saved me lots of time and money. I was naively looking forward to doing a Wild Women of Wongo remake. At first I was sorry to find out that a riffing version of Wild Women of Wongo received a copyright and caused the copyright office to reject my copyright. But after the shock wore off I was happy to move onto another project. At the time I visited Coral Castle (one of the original locations) the film seemed ripe to remake, Wild Women of Wongo was more ripe to riff obviously," said Merwin.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a mention on the Film Florida Facebook here: http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=28925175538&topic=6088 -- would that be of help?  I somewhat doubt it, but thought I would mention it just in case. Clockster (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: fixup
Talk:Smokey and the Bandit II

message: The next GOP state convention would be held in 1982, the previous was held in 1978. GoodDay 23:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas GOP convention in 1980? 

message: What does Pittsburgh, or perhaps the Pittsburgh Steelers, have to do with this film? Give me details, or maybe the Pittsburgh templates should be removed.--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:16, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed Pittsburgh and Steelers templates, no connection established. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pittsburgh
Talk:Black Belt Jones

message: Hello I'm Candace and I have been assigned to expand on the Black Belt Jones Wikipedia page. My edits will include an expansion of the introduction, plot, and reception of the film. I will also be adding sections on; background, martial arts in Blaxploitation films, race and the black power movement, and the soundtrack. My sources are scholarly approved articles, film reviews, and the film itself. This is my first Wikipedia Entry, so I will be open and understanding of any critiques and/or editing advice. Thank you. --Cgcolber (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assigned student editor
Talk:They Saved Hitler's Brain

message: Why does "They Saved Hitler's Brain" the tv edited version have a page but the original move Madmen of Mandoras does not? Even IMDb has it listed as two seperate movies, and if you are listing it as one movie shouldn't the title be Madmen of Mandoras seeing as it is the original? ((--24.103.173.3 (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would probably be because no one created the Madmen of Mandoras page yet. As unbelievable as this may seem, not every movie, television show, album, song or person has a page on Wikipedia. It's really not the end of the world. Incidentally, Wikipedia is not IMDb. Just because something is on IMDb does not mean it warrants a page on Wikipedia. 70.242.6.127 (talk) 03:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Madmen of Mandoras
Talk:Santa Claus Conquers the Martians

message: With names like Momar, Kimar, Gimar, Bomar, and especially Chochem (Hebrew/Yiddish for "wise person"), the writer of this movie must have been pulling everybody's leg. --Rpresser 19:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not likely. It appears to be a serious attempt to mix together SF, horror, adventure, kiddiefilm, and comedy, and someone invested $200,000 in its production. This difference of opinion is why this encyclopedia has a neutrality policy. David Spector (talk) 17:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This can't have been serious. 

message: In many countries, the rule of the shorter term is going to be used, meaning it's not going to be copyrighted in those countries. The owner of the rights in other countries, if that is to be added to this article, needs to be supported by Reliable Sources. (In response to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Santa_Claus_Conquers_the_Martians&diff=570402886&oldid=565030595 this edit)--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is the film in the public domain (in the United States)? Please update. 96.247.7.59 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 18:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright outside the United States 

message: Article says eight but she was born in 1953, and would have been at least 10. Error? SBHarris 11:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pia Zamora age?

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Future of Santa Claus (47th Series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#The Future of Santa Claus (47th Series) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  MB 03:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Future of Santa Claus (47th Series)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Frankenstein vs. Baragon

message: フランケンシュタイン対 
Is there a reason it's called ruby and is there a way to do it on other sites like WordPress?--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 20:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Title formatting

message: I see apon release in Japan the film was titled Frankenstein vs. Baragon and several media in Japan released it with the English title, Frankenstein vs. Baragon we use the American release title Frankenstein Conquers the World, not the official English title.
:WP:NCF applies here. Foreign-language films states to use the more common title. "Frankenstein Conquers the World" seems to be the title commonly used by sources (1, 2, 3). If a company like Kraken or Criterion releases it as "Frankenstein vs. Baragon", I think it's enough criteria to change the article title since new verified sources will review it under that title...maybe? Armegon (talk) 19:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: It should be noted that the version that ended up on the Criterion channel was the international version. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 19:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it really? Is it the Octopus ending? Armegon (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criterion release
Talk:Mesa of Lost Women

message: The article is already too long. 91.153.49.58 12:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree - this article suffers from WAY too much verbose opinion.  Cut it down, please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmoore080 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think you guys 'get the joke'.   This is a "MST3K" type movie.   All of the 'verbose opinion' in this article is simply a way of extending the 'joke' from the viewing-experience to the wiki-experience.  I don't know which of you nimrod actuall WROTE all of that stuff...but it's hilarious.   Oh..."Mesa of Lost Woman" is playing tonight at the Lansdowne Cinema in Landsdowne PA as part of their 'Terrible Tuesday' series....their version of 'MST3K'.   They've invited all men to come to the theater wearing sombreros and carrying guitars...and all women to come 'dressed to kill...or dressed as a giant spider'.    I can't wait!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much opinion 

message: By no means is this movie a classic (as perhaps implied by the review on the DVD case), but it's hardly one of the worst films made, particularly not if seen as tongue-in-cheek.
Watching the film again, seeing the amount of copy editing the article needed, and finding a reference that found the music good, I did a substantial rewrite. Even so, the article is filled with opinion. Unfortunately, I suspect that some of it is based on sources which the previous editors did not articulate, so I'm hesitant to delete more than the obvious personal opinion.
It's probably too late to find first hand sources, but there's apparently quite a story behind the creation of this film. That story might be more important than the film, itself. Multiple writers and directors do not necessarily produce a poor film (consider The Wizard of Oz), so there's some fruitful territory for someone investigating the process of reorienting films while in production. Mesa might well be a relevant example.
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Many seemingly reliable sources list this as a 1952 release. I think it may have been first released in 1952, then re-released in 1953 and 1956. But I don't have a good source to confirm that.—RJH (talk) 19:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb says 1953.  Other information there can be spotty at best (especially the "trivia" section), but release dates are usually trustworthy.  The Image DVD also says June 17, 1953.  So unless you have a source that says 1952, the tag should be removed. Rhindle The Red (talk) 01:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with that assessment and have since removed the tag. Pinkadelica♣ 22:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1952 or 1953
Talk:Spinout (film)

message: The film was released under this title in the UK (and elsewhere in Europe?) Bhasi23 01:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  California Holiday 
Talk:I Am Kurious Oranj

message: Unless there is great uproar I am going to change the name of the album to "I am Kurious, Oranj" (i.e. add a comma).  I have always seen it referred to in this way, including, from a quick check, in The Great Rock Discography.  I know that the front sleeve omits the comma but the 'spine' of the CD cover has it in, as does the CD itself.  It also makes sense as the play was "I am Curious, Orange".
--WeAreSilver (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the album
Talk:Baadasssss!

message: Why is does the box office gross list the Johnson Family Vacation as a reference and link?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.68.127 (talk) 07:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I reformatted/fixed all references (and have never typed the word "Baadasssss!" so much in my life). --Utilizer (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference issues
Talk:Ali (film)

message: this is very poorly written
:That's a little harsh. But it could do with some references and rewording. Perhaps some links to the mixed press mentioned would be helpful. --Opark 77 15:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The drawing of Ali, (which Ali sees, while running through an African village, in preparations for his fight with Foreman), is the same drawing used, to represent Joe Louis in the 1992 movie about 'Malcolm X'. GoodDay (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ali & Malcolm X 

message: Is it worth mentioning that both Angelo Dundee (boxing technical advisor) and Howard Bingham (producer) were supervisors for this film. Both were close friends of Ali.
Reeferboy (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supervisors 

message: Any commentary on the production costs that went into the film and its cool reception over the following years?  12:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  box office loss 

message: I feel that this section of the article needs to be greatly improved. --Bryan91997 (talk) 06:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Can't find the rated score for the film. Is this good for a teenager or a child?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.141.159.241 (talk) 14:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: why the movie end with the rumble in the jungle and  not drama in the bahamas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saif676 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  why the movie end with 1974 

message: why the movie end with the rumble in the jungle and not drama in the bahmas they would instead end the movie with 1978-1981  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saif676 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  why the movie end with 1974 

message: This source says the budget was $100 million. and it seems to wary too($105, 107).
https://web.archive.org/web/20010111214700/http://www.hive4media.com:80/news/html/theatrical_article.cfm?sec_id=2&article_ID=318
So, which source we should use here? Stick with Box Office Mojo? Timur9008 (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget
Talk:When the Wind Blows (comics)

message: Two overly-trusting souls believed (and continue to believe) how the powers-that-be have their best interests at heart. If it has not already, should not When The Wind Blows be included in a section on government lies and dis-information?
84.13.14.75 (talk) 16:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard-hitting account of the impact of Government dis-information  

message: — Assignment last updated by Kathleen C Sims (talk) 14:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition II

message: I am surprised there is no section on reception and criticism. Does anyone have anything to add? PJTraill (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception
Talk:Chris Wood (folk musician)

message: Can anyone confirm or deby where Chris Wood was born? Rhysashman, a known vandal, has added a link to the Chris Wood disambiguation page to a list of people born in Salford and by a process of deduction I've eliminated the other three but I can't seem to find a birthplace for this Chris Wood. I obviously want to remove the Salford link if it is incorrect. ThomasHarte 13:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost certainly not Salford! He speaks with a south-eastern English accent and lives in the south-east, and I believe he was born somewhere down thataway as well: probably Kent, I think? He was an early member of the Oyster Ceilidh Band (which later became the Oysterband), who got together in Canterbury, even though they include an Englisman, a Welshman and a Scotsman... (cue for a joke?) SiGarb 17:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace?

message: The Oysterband article says 1978, not 1980 as here. -- Beardo 04:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The "official Oysterband discography"  says 1980. SiGarb | Talk 18:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack's Alive 