Talk:Allies of World War I

message: The first map in the infobox seems to be badly wrong or wrongly labelled, and it should probably be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.23.33 (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Map Wrong 

message: See  Cornelissen, Christoph, and Arndt Weinrich, eds. Writing the Great War - The Historiography of World War I from 1918 to the Present (2020) online free  -- full coverage for major countries. Free download. Rjensen (talk) 21:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   major new book online free in 2020 

message: I contest the chronology given here that he commanded the Cdn Corps from January 1915 to September 1915; in fact in January 1915 until the summer that year the Canadian Expeditionary Force solely comprised the 1st Canadian Division which Alderson did command. The Canadian Corps was formed when a 2nd Division joined the field in September 1915 when Alderson stepped up to command the Corps and was not relieved of his command until May 1916. I will amend the detail accordingly but give time for any comment first.Cloptonson (talk) 07:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Edwin Alderson|Lt Gen Alderson]] - Command of the Canadian Corps

message: The reference used clearly said that Andorra did not declare war, so I have removed the claim that it did. DuncanHill (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andorra 

message: Hello. The third paragraph of the section labeled "Background" starts, "In the East, between 7–9 August the Russians entered German East Prussia on 7 August, Austrian Eastern Galicia." I suspect an editing mishap, but I don't know this history well enough to trust myself to fix it. I think it might be right to say, "In the East, the Russians entered German East Prussia on August 7-9 and Eastern Galicia on August 18." -- at least, that's how I read Russian invasion of East Prussia (1914) and Russian occupation of Eastern Galicia, 1914–15. Any opinions? DSatz (talk) 01:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah when I read it, it was so confusing. We should change it to what you said above. Cupcake547Let's chat! 14:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence under "Background" 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: World war1 members of group 1 103.14.90.130 (talk) 03:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  World war 1 

message: I heard that the Big Four from another page was France, Britain, Italy and the USA. Anotherwise known as the council of four, shall we eliminate Japan and Russia from the "Principal Allied Powers" and rename "Principal Allied Powers" into "The Big Four" or "The Council of Four"? 44naytions (talk) 00:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In the context of WWI, Big Four only really applies to the negotiation bloc at the Paris Peace Conference. Russia was one of the major Allied powers from the beginning of the War to its separate peace at Brest-Litovsk. Place Clichy (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: and so was Japan 2600:1700:3680:8B70:300C:71F9:6E13:C11F (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Four 

message: The infobox threatens to grow like a cancer. It already lists 21 Allied powers and now some editors are adding two or three "leaders" for each one. Under policy an infobox is supposed to: "summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article... The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose" I propose that we cut the info box back to the bare minimum of key information. I suggest we just list the principal allied powers and the historical era. The info box is not the place to list all the Allied powers and all the their "leaders". This can be done in a table in a separate section of the article. Please discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Box 

message: The redirect Alliedpower has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Alliedpower]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Historians use this term more often Nguyen280405 (talk) 10:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "Entente Powers" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved.  – robertsky (talk) 04:04, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Allies of World War I →  – More common name Nguyen280405 (talk) 11:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 January 2024