lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Route 261 (Delaware–Pennsylvania)

message: I find:
"PA 261 was first designated in 1928 to run from the Delaware border to PA 61 (Concord Road) and PA 161 (Chelsea Road) in Chelsea, following Foulk Road."
OK (and OK for the link to PA 161, which route number is no longer in use, but I fail to see (on PA 61 page, with PA 61 running north out of Reading) a reference to this older use of PA 61 designation.
:The original PA 61 was designated along what became US 322 between Concordville and Chester, which is now today unnumbered Concord Road. The route can be seen on the 1928 map. Pennsylvania Route 61 (1920s) exists as a redirect to U.S. Route 322 in Pennsylvania, which is where the original designation of PA 61 should be covered. The current PA 61, which was designated in the 1960s to replace the portion of US 122 between Reading and Sunbury, has no relation to the former route and therefore the former route is not covered in the PA 61 article. Dough4872 00:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's this about (older) PA 61? 
Talk:Trap bar

message: why is there no picture??
----
The first reference is a link to Jason Feruggia's blog where he says that he's no longer a proponent of trap bar deadlift over straight bar, yet he's still referenced here as a proponent 207.8.254.98 (talk) 15:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text says the trap bar is hexagonal, but the photo shows that it's octagonal. —Mahāgaja · talk 14:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hexagonal?
Talk:Noah Buschel

message: The filmmaker or his publicist or his friend who is adding promotional content and not adhering to numerous Wikipedia policies and guidelines needs to stop. Discuss your issues on this talk page and do not edit-war or an admin will be asked to intervene. This would involve protecting the page from anon IP edits or in pronounced cases blocking or banning an editor. Please read the Five Pillars of Wikipedia before editing. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:23, 1 July 2015‎
:I've just found the same issue with anon-IP 69.120.27.210 ... who even went so far as to erase the above comment on January 26! Per policy, we do not remove other editors' talk page comments except in extremely narrow circumstances.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotional content
Talk:Noah Cantor

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070127062547/http://www.verasburgershack.com/noahCantor.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Noah Eli Gordon

message: This edit history leads me to believe that there is some edit warring going on on this page.  Can the issue be discussed here rather than reverting and re-reverting?  It seems this may be an issue of WP:NOTREPOSITORY.  How can this be resolved?  Zujua (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Edit warring]] on this page? 

message: Gordon's mother announced his death on social media. I'll return once reliable sources have published it, but I thought a heads-up might be useful. Sad Lil Artsy Guy (talk) 02:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Dialogue-Assisted Visual Environment for Geoinformation

message: I think the references given are sufficient to support N, so I have removed the tag. DGG 04:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand, there is nothing notable in the references, one does not even appear to mention the project.  Unless you can provide some indication of notability I will nominate this for deletion. Rich257 12:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: You're wrong. Thankfully I got PDFs for all three of the cited works from Google. I didn't have to read past the abstracts to see phrases like "our software" which smacks of WP:COI coming from the development team at Penn State. Thus, the given references made the subject verifiable but not notable. Notability demands that sources be independent of anyone who worked/is working on the project. It failed WP:SOFTWARE before I found some mentions in ACM News, and another magazine that appears to track government ventures into new technologies. These are the types of sources that satisfy notability, not the papers from the development team. (A side effect of rewriting from "outside" sources is that the significance of the topic to the general reader is asserted.) Resurgent insurgent 16:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I agree with the bots that this article is a stub (since it's very short and under-referenced, and most of the references are old and, judging by the previous  section, somewhat COI-y). As for importance, I'm rating it as Low-importance since I don't really see how this is very important to the world of software. Please review; thanks. Duckmather (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rated article
Talk:Busan Lotte Town Tower

message: it seems that there are three sites here with three different pictures in use.  I can make an infobox based on emporis... but what about the other stuff?  Whatever we are talking about, we'll need to move the article to one of those other titles.  Is it the Lotte World II Hotel?  That seems like the best title.  Somebody second me and i will go with emporis.  DaronDierkes (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Emporis, the "Lotte World II Hotel", which is linked on this page as the Lotte Super Tower, has been canceled (i.e., "never built"). Are we even sure that this project is still active? -- Rai-me 16:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, we are not, but a great deal of fuss was made over it and it was continually redesigned.  It seems like a lot of buildings in Seoul reach approval status only to be cancelled later and then a new proposal is made on the same space. Even if it is cancelled, there is probably something else in the pipeline.  The fact is that Lotte World is on an extremely small plot for the amount of stuff that happens there.  Expansion is assured.  They closed last year for construction.  They've broke ground on something.  This is what confuses me about most buildings in Seoul, I hear the project is cancelled, but I still see the scaffolding going up.  Since they build about four times faster than anything we do in North America the results are usually pretty clear pretty fast.  (of course, i'm no longer in Seoul and google earth shuns updated pictures and labels on south korea for some reason).  So the building on Emporis may not be active, but I bet the idea certainly is.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  who to believe 

message: maybe it would be fair to say that the project moved to Busan.  ???  DaronDierkes (talk) 08:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Busan 

message: The link to the Korean version of the page points to the construction site of a project in Jamsil, a district of Seoul. ie. nothing to do with Busan. Needs to check this probably...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moiiiii (talk • contribs) 08:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean link to Seoul? 
Talk:Vincent Schaefer

message: 67.171.68.242 04:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Noel Cringle

message: This article has been protected since 2011 — ten years — although there is nothing in the article that one could remotely consider controversial, and even prior to protection there is scant evidence in the edit history of vandalism or edit wars. What gives? — 174.87.179.155 (talk) 18:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection should be removed 

message: Change died to 28th August 2021 Iom2021 (talk) 20:59, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

text: with added source.  — JerrieAtrix (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2021
Talk:Nora Perry (badminton)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved - there is a clear consensus that there is no primary topic. (non-admin closure)  Lennart97 (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Nora Perry titles a page with content and so it must also be dispositioned. If this request is granted, then Nora Perry may be moved to Nora Perry (disambiguation) and tagged with  in accordance with WP:ONEOTHER, or it may be deleted to make way for the first proposed page move. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 11:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 May 2021
Talk:Norbert Kröcher

message: According to the german Norbert Kröcher article, he was released from prison in 1985 as opposed to 1989.
83.253.32.171 (talk) 19:56, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Released in 1985? 

message: The meaning of the term "associated" is unclear. He was never a member, and never involved in any of the RAF's actions, as far as is publicly known. He did know some RAF members, but that does not imply "association", much less "strong" association.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udittmer (talk • contribs) 08:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Associated with the Red Army faction?
Talk:Norbert Shamuyarira

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:05, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Noritoshi Hirakawa

message: We read:
:Hirakawa's photographs are heavily sexually charged. He often portrays attractive young women performing some sort of titillating sexual act. By staging his leading ladies as voluntary collaborating with this act, he questions the prejudice and hostility towards male heterosexuality today. (etc etc)
Yeah, maybe. Or maybe he does it because this is what sells and gets published (cf Araki). I don't know. Why should I believe what's written in this article? What authorities is it appealing to? -- Hoary 14:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Like an essay
Talk:Kateryna Zubkova

message: A report on NineMSN says that she is eighteen, which may put her year of birth closer to 1989 than 1979. -- Ianiceboy 04:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Typo, fixed, thanks. Hesperian 04:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Norman Collier

message: I have not seen very much of Norman Collier, but I do remember him winning Ace of Clubs.  Far from his victory mistifying viewers, I thought he won hands down, his sketch where he was a driving examiner taking a woman for her umpteenth driving test was very funny, although I suspect it would seem rather dated and sexist nowadays. PatGallacher 16:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned here. Keith D (talk) 22:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norman Croucher

message: Shouldn't his OBE be stated along with his name at the very beginning of the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.0.201 (talk) 17:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "set out to climb Cho Oyu, one of the world's 14 mountains which exceed 8,000 metres."
This looks like "peacock description". What does this mean? If he climbed it, it deserves inclusion. If he didn't, why the detail of what he didn't do, and what exactly did he do? We can all "set out" to do something.Gordonofcartoon (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "set out to climb"
Talk:Norman Francis

message: If I had to cast my vote for greatest New Orleanian of the last fifty years, perhaps one of the two greatest ever, along with Louis Armstrong, it would be Dr. Francis.  He served as president of Xavier University from 1968-2015, making him one of the two longest-serving college presidents in United States history.  As president he oversaw the vast expansion of the university, now world-renowned as a learning institution.  This feat is remarkable particularly in light of the fact that during Hurricane Katrina floodwaters overtook Xavier's campus and that Dr. Francis managed to not only bring back the university and make it better than ever, but simultaneously presided as chair of the Bring Back New Orleans Commission, which was responsible for planning the rebuilding of the city after Hurricane Katrina.  Did I forget to mention that his own house was severely flooded?  Yet he worked so tirelessly to make sure that everybody else got back on their feet too.  Yet, even before the hurricane he had already distinguished himself as not only a college president but a civic leader, serving on various commissions for  number of mayors, and even then, many would have given him the same accolades. Garagepunk66 (talk) 07:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. Francis a national hero
Talk:Norman Franks

message: It was neither Australian machine gunner nor Captain Brown that shot down the Baron.  Note photographs of the plane in Royal Army records.  Note also all eye witness accounts.  The bullets from Brown's guns were striking earth.  He made a common error of pilots in combat of not leading his target extremely while diving prior to firing.  It was not the first Australian there are no holes in the front of the aircraft.  Neither was it Hopkins his bullets strike the aircraft near the low edge of the fuselage and none at the cockpit.  It was some Australian private firing his .303 bolt action rifle at closer range because of the angle of the strike entering the Baron just over three inches below his arm pit and not hitting his arm.  The shot was fired from behind and below.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.181.135.181 (talk) 19:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herr Baron Manfred Richthofen 
Talk:Norman Jones (actor)

message: I have added information from a report in the "Shropshire Star" newspaper following his death. I wonder if he also had a sketch in "Who's Who in the Theatre". In line with information given to the newspaper reporter mainly by relatives, I have amended the birthdate from 1935 to 16 June 1932.  He was stated to be 80 years old at death.Cloptonson (talk) 05:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Information
Talk:Norman Leyden

message: Someone made an edit that Norman Leyden debuted at the Hollywood Bowl. It's unfortunate, but there are no reliable sources for this information. From a primary source perspective, I was there at the concert when the band Pink Martini declared it to be so. I linked to the tweet (https://twitter.com/ChandraYrs/status/359154680938520576) which as you can see was retweeted by the band (thus applying some endorsement to the information). You can also see a fan video of the relevant part of the concert (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blfvG0Ziatc). I agree that this doesn't meet the criteria for reliable sources, especially in the context of BLP, but I'm hoping some enterprising editor might find a reliable source since I hope it's clear that this event really did happen. -- IlyaHaykinson (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debuting at the Hollywood Bowl
Talk:Norman Von Nida

message: I have changed the status of the article since his death. Capitalistroadster 11:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in status

message: This is a stub tending towards a start. It still needs more sourcing and details about Von Nida's impact on Australian golf. I have trouble with inline referencing so that needs work. Capitalistroadster 23:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Nuala Holloway

message: Did Nuala Holloway create this page by any chance?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynamsk (talk • contribs) 13:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: CN tags were placed all over the article agianst what is guided. The editor in question then removes citations. Will replace cites and have brought this to the editors attention. Please any input anyone? Murry1975 (talk) 08:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations for the double barrel surname are limited to two and over 6 years old while dozens of cited articles from recent times (as recent as April 2012,  The Irish Times) state another name. Even Holloway's own official website doesn't make any reference to this double barrel. There is also no accurate citation for the DOB and has come down to pure speculation based on one article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.22.156 (talk) 09:09, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pure speculation"? The year maybe, the date no its spot on. The name is used, but dont just delete everytime, discuss. Slapping a template on a page without discussion isnt very well, talk, like now. The date stays (if not the year- but try to source), a compromise might be better on the double barrelled name, I would suggest "Nuala Holloway (born 18 December circa 1956)" , and very last line in the lead " Holloway is sometimes refeered to by/as Nuala Holloway-Casey"ref here. Before making any changes from what it reads like now I would wait to see if there was anymore feedback. Thats my two bob worth. Murry1975 (talk) 09:30, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed all over the shop 
Talk:Nushawn Williams

message: Robbins KE, Weidle PJ, Brown TM, Saekhou AM, Coles B, Holmberg SD, Folks TM, Kalish ML. 	
Molecular analysis in support of an investigation of a cluster of HIV-1-infected women.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002 Oct 10;18(15):1157-61.
PMID: 12402955 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 
Cluster of HIV-positive young women--New York, 1997-1998.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 May 28;48(20):413-6.
PMID: 10365630 
user:Nocontroversytalk 21:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published study of viruses from this case
Talk:O'Bryan

message: The Volunteer Response Team is not royalty. If you have an issue with this article, write your concerns here on the talk page rather than slapping a POV tag on the article and demanding that everyone e-mail you to find out why. I see you abused your privileges by slapping a tag here on the TALK PAGE that can't be removed by regular editors. Bad. Stop that. Joe Hepperle (talk) 11:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drive-by Tagging by deluded self-proclaimed royalty 

message: Why is there NO mention of this song on the page? That is got to be his greatest song. More of my peers remember "I'm Freaky" over "Giglo"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thediva (talk • contribs) 17:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm Freaky 
Talk:Obba Babatundé

message: im not satisfied with this artical its leaving out cruciaql information. for instance what is his ethnic back ground.. i understand hes a black man but is he more rooted to africa or the USA i ask this because his last name sounds like a african name. by the way happy birthday obba babatunde your birth day is in a few days perhaps he or some one who knows him real well can add more encyclipedic content on this some what famous actor.
76.253.142.197 (talk) 22:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled
Talk:Obed Mlaba

message: I removed a lot of the unsourced criticisms as per WP:LIVE. I also cleaned up some of the weasel words, (around the images and in the criticism) as per WP:AWW.
Some of the text had also nothing to do with the mayor but more with the South African constitution and Tongat Hulett.
See Talk:Durban for why some of the source cannot be used. FFMG (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code clean up 

message: A photo of him is available on commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Navy_090713-N-1655H-159_Capt._Jim_Tranoris,_commodore_of_Commander,_Task_Force_363,_meets_with_Durban_Mayor_Obed_Mlaba.jpg Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Octave Levenspiel

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license 
*Needs copy edit and wikification
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Information on research should be expanded
*After expansion, the main text should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format with reference list (not external links)
*Full details needed for books (eg publisher, date, coauthors, ISBN)
*External links present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 23:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments

message: What is a diffusion machine? Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diffusion machine