lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cyanovirin-N

message: Check out table 1 here: http://www.tswj.com/2012/174837/
I never realised so many plants and algae could help us fight HIV.89.100.48.115 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More of the same - plants and algae with antiviral properties 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ahaffa (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Biochemistry I

message: has recently added, and then reverted the removal of, disputed content regarding the efficacy of Cyanovirin-N against HIV. This material was based on two sources:
# an article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy that fails WP:MEDRS as primary research;
# a chapter in Volume 415 of Methods in Enzymology that does not appear to exist. The DOI for this article fails to resolve, and the table of contents for this volume does not list the cited article.
I invite Sita1999 to discuss this matter.
 WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Cys-loop receptor

message: Wouldn't it be best served to rename this page pentameric Ligand-gated ion channels. Cys-loop is an old phrase and has fallen out of fashion because the discovery of the bacterial pLGICs that do not have the cys-loop  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.48.228 (talk) 18:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the name is just copied from TCDB 1.A.9 "The Neurotransmitter Receptor, Cys loop, Ligand-gated Ion Channel (LIC) Family" which is three names lumped together. From the description in TCDB it's really LIC = ligand-gated ion channel. And it contains also the pLGICs. --SCIdude (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change
Template talk:Tltt

message: Thank you, Hersfold and Gracenotes, for contributing to this template! I see that it makes it more straightforward if users don't have to substitute the pipe with 124, but there are a couple of problems:
# It makes tltt longer, which affects all pages (more than 100) in which it is transcluded. I won't fuss about it per WP:PERF, but I'd like to consider it, especially in view of the next point:
# It doesn't work for 3 parameters. As soon as we want to describe a template with 3 parameters we will have to add another parameter. And then we will find one with 4 ...
# I don't think it hurts to keep the comment about the substitution. People who work on templates are usually smart enough to understand such things. 
# With >1 parameters, we face the question how to name them. "par" and "par2" is just awkward, and the alternative of using "par1" when there is only one isn't much better. 
Obviously, we need to have some cutoff point, and unless we have many templates with 2 parameters, I'd prefer to keep it at 1. Since Hersfold already created template:tltt2, how about using that for the 2-parameter version? The great side effect of that would be that it would allow us to do some nifty things there that we would want to avoid her for perf reasons, such as having tool tips for each parameter. How about if I edited that template to show what I mean? — Sebastian 20:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More than one parameter

message: What's the point of substituting the curly braces? — Sebastian 20:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Substitution of curly braces

message: Could you please add reference to this on the related  pages? --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 05:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: other pages
Talk:Cysteamine

message: I don't know if there is a "not to be confused with" template, but if so, we should put one at the top of this page because the name is very similar to cystamine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EbedYahweh (talk • contribs) 16:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not to be confused with

message: The following is unsourced.   WP:MEDRS sources need to be found and this content checked against them before this is restored, per WP:BURDEN:
No significant side effects, other than allergic reactions in a few cases, are reported with topical use of cysteamine on human being. A burning sensation together with warmth and mild redness of the skin might occur immediately after application and would usually disappear after about 30 minutes. This is a normal reaction and happens only in the first few days of the treatment.
No study for use in pregnant and breast-feeding mothers have been conducted and hence cysteamine must not be used in these populations. Avoid using cysteamine if you, or somebody in your first-order family, suffer(s) from vitiligo.
Once in contact with the air, cysteamine can produce a slight sulfur-like odor. This is especially the case when cotton or synthetic tissues get in contact with cysteamine.
-- Jytdog (talk) 11:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced adverse effects content 

message: the following is unsourced, moved here per PRESERVE
;Reactions
It is used as the hydrochloride salt, as it readily oxidizes to the corresponding disulfide, in the presence of air.  The amine portion of the molecule serves as a catalyst for this reaction.
:4 HSCH2CH2NH2 + O2 → 2 NH2CH2CH2SSCH2CH2NH2 + 2 H2O
-- Jytdog (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced reaction 

message: I did the following pubmed searches and found no reviews:
* ("cysteamine"[MeSH Terms] OR "cysteamine"[All Fields]) AND ("hyperpigmentation"[MeSH Terms] OR "depigmentation"[All Fields]) AND Review[ptyp]  (link)
* ("cysteamine"[MeSH Terms] OR "cysteamine"[All Fields]) AND "melanins"[MeSH Terms] AND Review[ptyp] (link)
* ("cysteamine"[MeSH Terms] OR "cysteamine"[All Fields]) AND melanogenesis[All Fields] AND Review[ptyp] (link
{The MeSH name includes alt names btw, se here) 
So I took out the content on depigmentation as it was all old, primary sources. Jytdog (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  cysteamine and depigmentation 

message: Jytdog,Template:Infobox_drug is this what you meant here...--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: yes thanks!  i don't think there is a way to "convert", one just has to manually do it.  i'll do that tomorrow. Jytdog (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: User:HyperPigm  In this edit, the source provided (this one) says nothing about skin depigmentation.  Please explain why you are trying to add this unsourced content to Wikipedia. Jytdog (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You need good refs for claims pertaining to health. No confusion present. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skin whitening
Category talk:Pandemics

message: This category contains a mixture of pandemics which have occurred in history and the ongoing AIDS epidemic which could also qualify.  But its surely confusing to add diseases which are only potential pandemics i.e bird flu. Would a seperate category be more suitable for 'Potential pandemics' ? --JBellis 20:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic and ongoing & potential future
Talk:Aminolevulinic acid

message: # It's sort of vague ("more than a certain amount," "inhibit growth" to what extent?)
# It's only mentioned in the lead section and isn't mentioned anywhere else.
# It doesn't cite any sources and might be original research (see 4).
# There doesn't seem to be additional information anywhere else on the web.
I think it should be removed. BDONGLI (talk) 16:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Random COVID thing at the beginning

message: Is there any problem merging these two articles together? Chevinki 07:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes Searches for levulan  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.81.195 (talk) 10:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Despite having this discussion, in 2017 someone modified the Levulan to be a redirector to the Aminolevulinic acid page without integrating any of the Levulan page content into the Aminolevulinic acid page. I just undid that modification. Phedrence (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Article Merge (of this Aminolevulinic acid with Levulan) 

message: No merge is needed as the one article is about a (bio)chemical, the other about the use of the compounds with likewise properties as Aminolevulinic acid. T.vanschaik (talk) 09:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Despite having this discussion, in 2017 someone modified the Levulan to be a redirector to the Aminolevulinic acid page without integrating any of the Levulan page content into the Aminolevulinic acid page. I just undid that modification. Phedrence (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge
Talk:DAPI

message: An anonymous editor removed the note that DAPI stains nuclei in live cells; I restored the material.
DAPI and the Hoechst stains will both pass through the membranes of live cells—I've used them both in that exact application.  The time and concentration of DAPI required vary depending on the cell line, but it will definitely cross an intact membrane.  (The uptake is quite a bit faster for fixed, permeabilized cells, however.)
Googling around, it seems that a fairly high concentration is needed, and that it may not work for all cell lines; I add it to HeLa cells at about 10μg/mL in medium about 30 minutes prior to imaging.  TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live cell staining with DAPI 

message: The only alternative mentioned right now is HOECHST. Wikipedia should, IMO, try to find more alternatives from different vendors, since as it is, I consider it slight advertisement. It probably is not enough to warrant removing it, as some people may still find it useful, but wikipedia should not promote this vendor over that vendor even if it was not intentionally. 2A02:8388:1603:CB00:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 10:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternatives 
Talk:Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

message: "Although DHEA-S itself is hormonally inert, it can be converted back into DHEA"
check out: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-lookup/doi/10.1210/jc.2004-2386  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.236.194 (talk) 04:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  dhea dheas conversion
Talk:Korg M1

message: Why the comparison with D-50 or the DX-7? They had nothing to do with the M1! The DX-7 and the D-50 are digital synths with different engine sounds, the M1 is an early low tech workstation, with the ability to turn into a black brick after battery lose!
Also, there's a lot of Korg propaganda style in this article...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.245.189.166 (talk) 03:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-sense

message: I think the line that states the M1 is the top selling synth of all time should be removed/changed. Earlier today I came across this website: http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/05/22/the-korg-microkorg-the-most-popular-synthesizer-of-all-time/
I did a bit of online digging and every page that I could find that made the statement that the M1 is the top selling synth either links back to this page or the source for this page. Personally, I think using just a single, eleven year old review as the only source is a bit of a stretch. Perhaps just a small rewrite from "the M1 became the best-selling digital synthesizer of all time, which it remains today." to "The M1 is one of the top selling digital synths of all time."
Other thoughts anyone?
Looneybunny (talk) 04:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best selling synth of all time? 

message: This article is a complete mess. From claims with no sources, opinions, sections that contradict others, and plain incorrect information, I am honestly surprised that no one has nominated this page for deletion. There is so much extra information that has nothing at all to do with the M1, (regarding later Korg AI based synths like the 01W), that as I read, I was no longer sure I was even still on the same page. A full review/rewrite is desperately needed. Looneybunny (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Rewrite Needed 
Talk:DNQX

message: Check the structure...it needs redrawing--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentavelnt carbons are an issue 

message: Is this really  	C8H4N4O6 or  	C8H2N4O6? There look to be two different molecules around with this name differing in oxidation state. The diagrams are 1 of each. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: H2 or H4

message: — Assignment last updated by Bubbstar (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab - spring 2023
Talk:Alpha Corvi

message: I searched Fuhrmann and Chini (2012) but found no mention of HR 4623. Is it possible the wrong reference was inserted? Praemonitus (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's there, as α Crv. There are several paragraphs of text devoted to it although it isn't one of the program stars. Lithopsian (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:De novo protein structure prediction

message: Added graphics to show primary to tertiary. Not sure where the best place to show them would be so I just placed them. Feel free to move them!
Dive7 0 (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Decapacitation factor

message: The sentence on cholesterol/phospholipid ratio was kept however there was no strict source found which stated this information. However, the Nixon paper added as a reference to the article suggested the release of cholesterol plays a role in supporting capacitation. In addition, I looked into the sentence "In vitro incubation of DF with uterine fluids has been reported to have failed to destroy DF activity." from and found support for the ability to destroy DF activity through amylase from the Dukelow paper. More research needs to be done into secondary sources which draw further conclusions on DFs as well. Katstudies (talk) 00:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Deoxy sugar

message: Hello! 
This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:Ribofuranose-2D-skeletal.png, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Ribofuranose.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Ribofuranose-2D-skeletal.png]]
Talk:Demethylation

message: Regular visitor with a small question - Would demethylyzing DNA molecules go under this article? If so, has there been any reported instances where it was possible to accomplish this feat? I think that demethylation would be an important aspect of cloning (along with methyl/acetyl groups, etc.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.165.203 (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is O-demethylation? --Abdull (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  o-demethylation?
Talk:Coconino Community College

message: Material, such as "CCC is not just a place to learn but also a place to better your future" had to be removed, because it was irrelevant. That sentence sounded like an advertisement. Peacock terms and the sentence saying "visit the website" were also removed. I'm sorry if it was wrong. Thanks Relevantsus (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unnecessary information
Talk:Deoxyadenosine triphosphate

message: I believe that this page should be merged with adenosine triphosphate, as that is what this page is actually about.  I do not know how to go about that. ThinkerThoughts 18:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ATP article is well-written, and but this one is pretty bad, even when not considering it is under the wrong title. It don't think there is anything salvagable in it. I'm posting it here and replacing the article with a one-liner.Narayanese 00:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Deoxyadenosine triphosphate, dATP, is composed of the purine adenosine in a nucleoside form attached to a triphosphate group.Carleerc1994 (talk) 04:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:List of Christian punk bands

message: I'm thinking the lead should have a brief blurb about the nature and history of Christian punk, similar to the hardcore and metal lists, but I don't really know that much about the genre. Does anyone know of any sources that would be good for this?--Invisiboy42293 (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should put in something about the genre's history. 

message: So, , going back through the discussions I realize that I am now a very different editor than I was 3-4 years ago. Do you want to revisit the band listings here, or is the division of listings under different subgenres (and thus not putting glossy "pop-punk" bands next to MxPx) satisfactory to you?--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 14:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisit listing? 
Talk:Fly crew

message: Most of the theatre flying threads focus on counter weight systems and the roles and principles involved. How can we distinguish that these discussions use many of the same terms 'Fly crew' being the most relevant here, as automated venues but the definitions differ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ledieu (talk • contribs) 03:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One option is noting that fly crews normally fall under the carpentry team, whereas automation is its own team.  Breaking theatre into departments may be the simplest solution. LightRobb (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Automation and its impact on terms and roles

message: The Discussion of a oft ignored stage superstition should be removed from this article. Whistling isn't bad luck in theaters, it's called a head set and thats what is used to issue fly calls. Really all of the fly articles should be merged into flyman, since only shows with flying actors will more then one or maybe two fly operators, and perhaps we should de-sex the term altogether.--71.107.212.156 18:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can assure you that whistling onstage is still regarded as bad luck, regardless of whether the real reason is still valid. Bryson430 19:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.  History is an important part of articles and therefore I do not see why the bit about whistling should be removed.  I toured with a show that had to have 4 people on the fly rail because certain moves were very complex and required more than one person so your reasoning behind that is sort of incorrect.  As for the gender of the term, I think that de-sexing it is fine.  --Lekogm 00:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Whistling, Gender, potential merges

message: To suggest that this article be merged with Riggers is crazy, not all Fly Crew are riggers and not all Riggers are Fly Crew. Mrtechguy (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that not all riggers are fly crew.  But please explain why, in your opinion, not all fly crew are riggers. Throwing out the word "crazy" does not really do much, in my opinion, to illuminate the discussion.  Catsquisher (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Seconding the difference.  From my (admittedly limited) experience in theatre, normally fly crews are found in fixed-location shows running the fly system whereas riggers are found both in touring and fixed-location shows (their use primarily being to hang the flying goods).  This does not exclude fly crews from being riggers, as often they hang specialty items as-needed for a show. LightRobb (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Rigger

message: The final sentence of the "Safety" section ("But can be equally as dangerous should falling occur and rescue be delayed.") is unclear and grammatically unsound.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.69.190.254 (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up sentence as best as I can, maybe someone can add more.  LightRobb (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Safety" section ambiguity
Talk:Legal malpractice

message: This article contained the text of two articles written by an attorney named Richard Klass.  Mr. Klass's web site asserts a copyright in these articles, and permission to copy them has not been explicitly granted, so per WP:C I have removed them.  PubliusFL 21:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio removal 

message: I removed the following because it is written in part like a personal opinion piece:
However, some of this may be salvageable, so please feel free to work as much back into the article as can be properly sourced. Note that suits against the opposing attorney would likely be for Abuse of process or the like, not for malpractice. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal essay-like material removed
Talk:Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine

message: This article doesn't need it's own page.  It is one of a thousand forms of phosphatidylcholine and not sufficiently different to warrant special mention.  Anyone object if I tag for deletion?  Roadnottaken 13:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, according to the article itself dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine is "the major constituent of pulmonary surfactant". I'd say that's an assertion of significance :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete? 

message: Both :File:Acurate 3D representation of DPPC.gif and :File:3D dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine.gif  are inaccurate representations of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine.These structures incorrectly show all the non-hydrogen atoms occupying a single plane.  The phosphate groups and the quaternary ammonium groups, for example, should have tetrahedral geometry.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate chemical structure images
Talk:DLX gene family

message: 1/16/17 DennisPietras (talk) 03:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, well, in general we don't discuss such minor things much on talk pages, but if we're going to, then it must be a Start class at least, as it's got some detail and is quite extensively referenced. If it were a few times longer, even if the reffing were patchy, it'd be a C. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved out of unassessed on the genetics project
Talk:DnaA

message: This article draws heavily from a single source. In addition, the details of replication initiation are not relevant to this article. Instead, more detail could be added about the protein's domains, activation, and conservation across organisms. Mbarnett2014 (talk) 03:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: General Improvements

message: — Assignment last updated by Shahr07 (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Molecular Genetics

message: Four features of bacteria that enable them to survive in a wide variety of habitats@ 41.114.190.112 (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life Science
Talk:Docosatetraenoic acid

message: There seems to be a inconsistency between this article, which says Adrenic acid is an Omega-3 fatty acid, and the inclusion of Adrenic acid in the list of Omega-6 fatty acids in Omega-6_fatty_acid. Can someone with decent molecular biology knowledge resolve this? Rupert Clayton 18:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's omega-6, since it's derived from AA (also omega-6). I fixed the article. Frankg 19:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency?

message: Virtually all the information in this record is specific to Adrenic acid. I'd suggest that a record about a specific compound is more relevant than one about a class of molecules that has only one "interesting" member. --The chemistds (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to Adrenic acid?