Talk:Catholic Charismatic Renewal

message: I've heard that many Charismatic Catholics are critical of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, particularly the use of the vernacular.  Is this true, and if it is, can anyone provide a reference? --Saforrest 03:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think the exact opposite is true. The reforms of the Second Vatican Council have allowed the Catholic Charismatic population to grow. To my knowledge and experience (with there being quite a few charismatic churches/priests/bishops in the Archdiocese of Miami) this statement is false. Aafm 23:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charismatic Catholics and Vatican II 

message: Just want to add a comment that being baptized in the Holy Spirit was a catalyst in my life.  All who are baptized have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them, but what this prayer asks is that God stir that gift into flame.  And He does not dissappoint.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.212.62.52 (talk) 19:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charismatic Renewal changed my life 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Catholic Charismatic Renewal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928131946/http://ccc.garg.com/ccc/articles/John_Paul/John_Paul_001.html to http://ccc.garg.com/ccc/articles/John_Paul/John_Paul_001.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cantalamessa.org/en/libri.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928131946/http://ccc.garg.com/ccc/articles/John_Paul/John_Paul_001.html to http://ccc.garg.com/ccc/articles/John_Paul/John_Paul_001.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080308173156/http://www.jcu.edu/suenens/pub.htm to http://www.jcu.edu/suenens/pub.htm
*Added systematic theology tag to https://theologykristen.blogspot.com/2021/11/reformed-systematic-theology.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Catholic Charismatic Renewal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060507192431/http://www.rc.net/lansing/ctk/welcome/index.html to http://www.rc.net/lansing/ctk/welcome/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150623072810/http://www.catholicsocialscientists.org/CSSR/Current/2008/Sobrino%20-%20Church%20%26%20P.A..pdf to http://www.catholicsocialscientists.org/CSSR/Current/2008/Sobrino%20-%20Church%20%26%20P.A..pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101005015942/http://www.resurrectionc.com/html/colin_talks.html to http://www.resurrectionc.com/html/colin_talks.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose the following changes in the lead:
* The word  in the 1st, 3rd, and 4th paragraphs if used at all should be in quotes and not in wikivoice. 
* The word  in the 1st, 2nd, and 5th paragraphs should not be capitalized (and neither should  in the 5th paragraph).
* In the first paragraph  and  should be in quotes and not in wikivoice.
* Remove the 1st sentence of the 3rd paragraph, since such a statement needs to be attributed and cannot be made in wikivoice. The sentence is also repetitive, since Fr. Cantalamessa is quoted as saying essentially the same thing.
* Change  to , per WP:SAY.
* Remove the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph, because it states in wikivoice that the Catechism of the Catholic Church should be interpreted as favoring the charismatic renewal approach (rather than the traditional approach that some other Catholics prefer). This violates WP:OR and WP:NPOV. (Then move the quotation by Fr. Cantalamessa to the 2nd paragraph.)
* In the 1st sentence of the 4th paragraph change  to .
* Remove the last sentence of the 4th paragraph, which is repetitive and gives WP:UNDUE attention to a not very good source.
* In the 5th paragraph change the word  to , per WP:SAY.
Please let me know if you object to any of these proposed edits. Thanks. NightHeron (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for making the lead NPOV-compliant 

message: I removed material that lacked independent sources (that is, sources other than those from the charismatic movement and official Church statements). Other parts of the article also need better sourcing.
According to WP:PROMO,  Earlier I made some edits to the lead (listed above in this talk-page) in order to make the tone more encyclopedic. But this topic is far from my own areas of knowledge, so other editors would be better able to improve the neutrality and the sourcing in the main body. Whenever possible, statements should be verifiable through . I'd have no objection to putting the material I removed back in the article if care is taken to give better sourcing and not to express religious opinions in wikivoice. NightHeron (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs independent sources, compliant with [[WP:PROMO]]