lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blade Bladeson

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Matt Clark (The Young and the Restless)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hope Adams

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lynne Bassett

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Danny Romalotti

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Northern right whale dolphin

message: *:Northern Right Whale Dolphin → :Northern right whale dolphin — Fix capitalization —Calliopejen1 03:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't appear to be uncontroversial. Wikipedia:WikiProject Cetaceans and many other WikiProjects dealing with animals suggest Capitalizing All Words, even though that doesn't seem to make sense in terms of most other naming conventions. Dekimasuよ! 06:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move

message: Note: "small, slender and finless species"
This is a peculiar statement in an article that presents pictures of the creatures with fins.
I don't think that there is any such thing as dolphin, whale, or porpoise w/o and fins. They all have horizontal fins that they use to steer with. Also, all of these aquatic mammals have "tail fins", otherwise called "flukes".24.156.77.198 (talk) 22:33, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  small, slender and finless species ...
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject reform/Tagging

message: My templating plugin doesn't currently support this template. Do we see this template as being the future, or an interrim measure until something better (CSS?) comes along?
I would like to point out to projects which use my plugin with AWB (several) that modifying it to work with  might not be easy. I can't readily conceive of a way of telling the program which templates belong to WikiProjects, unless all such templates somehow "self identify". (If anyone has a better idea of the logical process the program should follow when encountering this template or when deciding whether to add one and which templates to move inside it, I can think about that how might translate into code). For now, I'm advising users to skip pages which contain this template. --kingboyk 19:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you explain the problem? (I couldn't find the plugin from your usepage.) I've come across an issue where templates within templates are not properly recognized by pywiki. Gimmetrow 20:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm surprised you haven't seen it, it's done over 100,000 edits :) User:Kingbotk/Plugin. --kingboyk 21:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|WikiProjectBanners}}
Talk:Pastilla

message: Y'all need to work this out here on the talk page before making any further edits. Valereee (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full protection, 2 days 

message: the French researchers who extensively studied Algerian cuisine during the 19th and 20th centuries did not make any mention of this dish. It was only in 1908, when one author mentioned it in Tlemcen, attributing it to Moroccan influence in the city. He noted, "Mais, on parle d'un plat d'origine marocaine préparé à base de châtaignes, ce qui prouve que la cuisine marocaine a depuis très longtemps eu une influence sur la cuisine algérienne."
Source: La "pastilla", plat marocain au nom latin Marin Wagda - Published 2003 - History Source: https://www.persee.fr/doc/homig_1142-852x_2003_num_1246_1_4104
Regarding Bouhlila's credibility as a source, it's important to note that he incorrectly attributed many things to the Algerian refugees of 1830. These refugees, we know, constituted a small group of unskilled individuals. Despite his claims, Algerians often reference his work, even though it has been debunked multiple times. In his writings, Bouhlila blends together ancient and modern Oriental influences and attributes them with an Ottoman origin, an idea introduced to Morocco only in 1830 according to him.
For instance, Bouhlila asserted that eggplant cultivation was brought to Morocco by Algerian refugees in 1830, whereas historical evidence shows that this plant has been present in Morocco since at least the 13th century, as Ibn Razin mentioned it in the context of Morocco and Andalusia. He also stated that the word "noqra" (silver) was introduced to Morocco by these refugees, but records show that the term was already known in Morocco as early as 1779, and it was not even recognized in Algerian dialects (according to William Marçais). Furthermore, Bouhlila claimed that the caftan was introduced to Morocco by these refugees in 1830, despite evidence from Von Dombay's accounts of visiting Rabat, Meknes, and Tangiers in the late 18th century. In the same book, he mentioned that the Moroccan sultan welcomed the Algerian refugees by providing them with caftans, money, and food. He also asserted that the Ikhwan (the Islamist movement) was introduced to Morocco by Algerians in 1830, even though the movement was not established until 1912. Eeddahbi (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pastilla is moroccan, very important sources to consider. 

message: it’s a Moroccan specialty not a Maghreb specialty please fix the problem 207.30.62.208 (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: - Wikipedia follows the reliable sources on this. - MrOllie (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2024
Talk:S. H. Bihari

message: *taarif karoon kya uski jisne tujhe banaya
*kajra mohabbatwaala ankhiyon mein aisa daala kajre ne le lee meri jaan
These songs are considered evergreen classics even today, and are no doubt notable. Unfortunately the pages for the movies they are from haven't been created yet. If we remove these songs from the page it would leave this article incomplete as we would be leaving out some of his best work.
However, I understand the requirements of WP:N and WP:V. I'll be looking around for refs to support the above.
Happy editing,xC | ☎  06:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular songs

message: It looks like he was born in 1922 and dies on 25 February 1987, but I'm having trouble finding reliable sources to support those precise dates. Pburka (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and death
Talk:Mì Quảng

message: Does the Quảng in Mi Quảng come from Quang Nam? If so, it should be stated in the article. Badagnani 06:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Are those the same dish? Cao lau is described in Vietnamese noodles absolutely the same way: wheat noodles, small amount of broth, with meats and herbs. Can not see any differrence. Kf8 (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, i have eaten cao lau. its like my quang too much :)Ho Tuan Kiet 11:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Might be similar, but they're definitely not the same. The noodles for mi quang are generally wider than in cao lau, and cao lau uses fried squares of dough in place of toasted rice paper. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 18:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They're totally different dishes in every way imaginable, the noodles are different, the meats that accompany the noodles are different, the noodles look different and taste different. The only way that they are similar is they both contain a broth. Besides, the history and culture of the dishes is different too. Mi Quang are a specialty of quang nam province and Da Nang, whereas cao lau are uniquely Hoi Anian.Apples&Manzanas (talk) 23:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mi Quang vs. Cao lau 

message: This section is directed at the Chinese Vietnamese user Nguyen1310 who keeps posting erronous information about Mi Quang. Quang is the term used by Quang Nam people to refer to ourselves or anything that comes from Quang Nam. Nguoi Quang means a person/people from Quang Nam. Dat Quang means the geographic region that is Quang Nam. Giong Quang means Quang Nam accent. Quang Nam people don't eat egg noodles, period.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.133.155.169 (talk) 02:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mi Quang's name
Talk:Cao lầu

message: The title of the article needs tone marks. Badagnani 06:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tones

message: Are those the same dish? Mi Quang is described in Vietnamese noodles absolutely the same way: wheat noodles, small amount of broth, with meats and herbs. Can not see any differrence. Kf8 (talk) 07:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, as someone who has eaten both, I can tell you that mi quang and cao lau are entirely different. They dont even look the same. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mi Quang vs. Cao lau 
Talk:Sakura Shukugawa Station

message: I created the English version of this article primarily by using the Japanese page as a template and translated it.  I appologize if the English isn't completely correct.  I tried my best to create a good article that conveys a lot of information and is helpful to people.  I will probably need to make a few corrections here and there, so there may be some minor edits that show up in the history.  I hope this is a good article.  Hosikawafuzi 06:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of the Article

message: I appreciate the addition of a stock photo from the JR Website of the front of the station, but the image of the J-Card is also valid, and I'm re-adding it.  Hosikawafuzi 01:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-addition of the 開業 J-Card
Talk:Justin Smith (actor)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and minimal disambiguation policies. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 21:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Justin Smith (Australian actor) →  – There are no other actors named Justin Smith. Christiancardenas732 (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 August 2021
Talk:Anthony Collins (composer)

message: Anyone want to look for information on that 2005 John Wilson CD with the BBC Orchestra?  I couldn't find anything.  Sonuvafitch (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005 John Wilson CD

message: His Elegy for Edward Elgar has been recorded, including a theme from the third movement of Elgar's third symphony.
: Not sure what this means.  Does his Elegy include a theme from Elgar's #3?  Yes? Then I think it should read:
:* His Elegy for Edward Elgar, which includes a theme from the third movement of Elgar's third symphony, has been recorded.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  19:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Elegy
Talk:The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (film)

message: I wasn't able to find it quickly, but it should be corrected when possible.  Migp 06:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference link has bad URL 

message: I removed this section for a few reasons. First of all, there is nothing controversial about the differences between the book and the film. Second, I fail to see the ecyclopedic notability. The differences are not notable simply due to the fact they exist. If that were the case, every Wikipedia film article that's based on a book would have such a section attached to itself due to the unavoidable fact of artistic interpretation by the filmmakers. The only external link provided for this section states the following about the differences between the book and the film: 
Third, without proper references to verify not only the relevance of these differences but to specifically list them, I would qualify their inclusion in Wikipedia as WP:OR. Lastly, though the differences may exist, I believe that having a whole section devoted to these differences gives WP:UNDUE weight to this point of view and might give the reader the wrong impression of how notable this issue really is compared to the coverage, or lack thereof, of the subject in reliable media sources. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the controversy section is still in the article. If not completely being removed, I suggest that wording be changed, as it's clearly opinionated. SweetNightmares (talk) 04:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, I guess I really don't read a lot of entertainment news, but what the heck is Salon.com? I've never heard of it, which makes me question the section's credibility, as well. SweetNightmares (talk) 04:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No comment on the Controversy section, but Salon.com is definitely a reliable source. - kollision (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

text: From the article's history it seems Utilizer's edit was reverted without rationale and against consensus by a user who is now indefinitely blocked. I have restored this original edit not just for the reasons given above but also because the current section is incomprehensible and has very clear WP:BLP issues. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. --Utilizer (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section
Talk:Love in the Time of Cholera (film)

message: * Bardem Looks for Love in the Time of Cholera —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Headline

message: Per Template:Infobox film: "...preference is given to reliable databases like BFI, AFI, or Variety....If there is a conflict of information in various reliable sources, then list only the common published nations."
:
BFI says "USA, Great Britain".
:
AFI says "United States".
:
The "common published nation" is the United States. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country 

message: Are there any citation for the running time?
My second hand Australia DVD copy states 97 minute . Is it just censorship for getting M (mature) rating , or the wiki article is wrong? 49.196.149.14 (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like the DVD cover has wrong info. Matthew hk (talk) 05:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running time
Talk:Jon Avnet

message: Jon went to Arrandale Elementary School and was very mean to a girl in his class.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.144.220 (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrandale Elementary School 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Brooklyn Films. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 18#Brooklyn Films until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brooklyn Films" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Georgina Verbaan

message: Why the category "Dutch people of Indonesian descent"? There is nothing about her claimed Indonesian descent in the article, also her name and looks doesn't suggest anything like that either. 82.141.64.25 (talk) 22:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's unsourced, then it has to go. I have removed the category. StAnselm (talk) 23:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there are some other articles also, which have some category, then nothing about that topic in the text. But, I have never seen just a category to be sourced. 82.141.64.25 (talk) 23:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons explicitly applies to categories as well. StAnselm (talk) 23:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of veterans' organizations

message: I would be good to see somewhere a discussion of the similarities and differeneces of thes organizations, particularly how all the numerous U.S. organizations differ from one another, there relative size, etc. - 58.161.226.94 07:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommendation

message: I recommend moving this article to "List of veterans organizations".  Searching on google, it seems more commonly refered to as "veterans organizations" vice "veterans' organizations".  Thanks. FieldMarine (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: Why is the American Red Cross listed as a veterans organization?   Tiyang (talk) 02:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not list, I don't think it's specifically a vets organization.  Here's their mission statement.  Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Marine.  And THANKS!  I'm an AF Vet.  Respectfully,   Tiyang (talk) 06:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Oorah buddy, Semper Fi!  Thanks for your service. FieldMarine (talk) 11:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: American Red Cross

message: Why is American Corporate Partners on the list of Veterans Organizations?  Respectfully,   Tiyang (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: American Corporate Partners

message: What exactly are the inclusion criteria for this list? It should not be an indiscriminate list of any organisation that has anything to do with veterans, per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:INDISCRIMINATE.--ukexpat (talk) 21:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion criteria?
Talk:Barbara Lyon

message: INCORRECT!
*((She faded from the scene following 1962 television guest appearances on McHale's Navy and My Three Sons.[1]))
THIS IS INCORRECT! Barbara Lyon, daughter of Bebe Daniels and Ben Lyon, NEVER did these TV shows, nor did she do Let's Make A Deal or "Sale of the Century", etc.. Those credits belong to a U.S. actress/model also named Barbara Lyon, still living.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmm1965 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Were Barbara and Daniel adopted by Ben and Bebe?  If it's so it might be worth recording in the article. 109.149.208.85 (talk) 18:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adopted?
Talk:Jack Mulcahy (actor)

message: Jack has a very big cult following with the character Rem Lezar which he played in 1989 for the film "Creating Rem Lezar". No mention of that here? Come on!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GingerStokes (talk • contribs) 04:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Rem Lezar? 

message: Clean up or delete. Or give reasons. Or something. Otherwise the tag is just counter to Wikipedia. DreamGuy (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? Notability?