Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Beyt Tikkun

message: :I removed false info placed by Bstone. I have made many edits in WikiProject Hinduism. Bstone, please refrain from false statements. You are not helping your cause. Ism schism (talk) 06:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concerning the disruptive actions of Bstone, I am in complete agreement with Argyriou's assessment. Ism schism (talk) 06:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Response Concerning my "cause" and "actions", Ism schism has contributions dating back to Feb 2, 2008, which was a total of 5 days of editing at the time of my adding the SPA tag as the SPA tag says there are very few other edits, which is still very true. 5 days of editing is entirely appropriate to be adding the SPA tag when such account is opining "keep" in an AfD. If you believe my actions to be "disruptive" then I would suggest you report me to the relevant noticeboards on this project. You should be warned that precedent has been set on this project for penalizing those who falsely claim disruption, harassment, vandalism, etc. Bstone (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment You have a bad habit of misrepresenting the facts, Bstone. The  template says that an editor "has made few or no other edits outside this topic". This is demonstrably untrue, as you have just shown. You've misrepresented both the template and Ism schism's edit history. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 16:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Response I consulted with admins on the IRC channel before and was told that SPA was the most appropriate tag to go with. If you have a problem please bring this up to the proper noticeboards. I now count four accusations you've made against me. Bstone (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Malik is correct about using the {spa}. Also, it does seem that Ism recently joined the world of Wikipedia. Yet give the kid credit, s/he already learned to correct yet another of your false accusations. You are persistant at the least! Kudos! Culturalrevival (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Final response We will agree to disagree. Have a nice day. Bstone (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Response You should agree to stop making false statements, like saying the I have made little or no edits outside of this topic. This was a false statement and your excuse that you were using advice from others shows a lack of responsibility for your actions. My area is Hinduism, but as the majority in this discussion have noted, the article under discussion is notable and well sourced. This is what I stated in my vote. Ism schism (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Since when is the lurkers support me in IRC a valid argument for anything? Bstone, you need to quit lying. Argyriou (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Argyriou, it's often better to indicate that you believe a statement isn't correct, instead of saying that an editor is lying. Addhoc (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Noted that 4 editors have commented on Bstone's use of a false statement in his/her arguements above. Culturalrevival (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)