Talk:Mauna Kea Beach Hotel

message: from VfD:
Advertising. Spam. Promotional. No potential to become encyclopedic. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:45, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After creating this article and having no knowledge of its previous deletion, I see that the deletion discussions made no references to the hotel's historical or architectural honors.  I don't have access to the deleted version, but I might assume it cited no secondary sources either.  It seemed to be a case of "I don't see why its notable and I won't do any research, therefore its non-notable and should be deleted." *sigh*. --Oakshade 20:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous AfD

message: I was in the middle of working on this article when my work was reverted without discussion, in what seem disruptive edits. The hotel was briefly notable 45 years ago, but now there are several hotels in the are that are even more expensive. I was reworking into an article on the bay, including the notable history before the building was built (the family owning the land, part of Parker Ranch). There may also be more notable things about the area, say, after the building is torn down following the next earthquake. I never denied the building was notable, but even in National Historic Districts we do not necessarily give each building its own article, if it would never get beyond the one or two sentence stage. This is a matter of taste, but the civil thing to do would be to put a  template and discuss with mutual respect of the editors involved. A knee-jerk revert within five minutes with no discussion seems an abuse.
::::N.B. There is no such thing as a "National Historic District" as a proper noun phrase.  The currently linked phrase National Historic District is under discussion to be deleted.  What is meant was perhaps "a historic district listed on the National Register of Historic Places. --doncram (talk) 14:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it's very bad editing on Oakshade's part.  But I think it would be better to write up the Kaunaoa Bay article first, then make this one a redirect.  I agree that the MKBH doesn't really seem notable enough to warrant its own article.  KarlM (talk) 21:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Conflict of Interest????  Ownership????  Please assume good faith.  I have absolutely NOTHING to do with this property or business.  I've never even been to the island of Hawaii.  Please don't attack other editors without anything to support your attack.  As far as ownership goes, this was an architectualy renowned property and it has received in-depth coverage by reliable sources.  That's why I created an article about it.  Feel free to erase anything that's un-sourced in the article.  But please don't removed sourced content.  If you feel the article topic doesn't warrant inclusion, feel free to nominate it for AFD.--Oakshade (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I removed that information about the geographical feature of the bay because that's a different topic.  This is an article about a hotel, not the geographical feature bay.  Different topic, different category and different article. --Oakshade (talk) 21:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I didn't think they were the same, but given how short the hotel article is, and the lack of much notability for it, I don't see the need for two separate ones.  I'm not an architect, but is it really "renowned"???  It looks pretty pedestrian to me (the Four Seasons down the coast is much better-looking).  If it is, then there should be a picture of what's architecturally significant.  FWIW, the Hana Hou article says that the AIA ranking was not from the AIA itself, but determined by "1,800 randomly sampled Americans".  Where they found that many that knew about the kind of buildings that are on the list, I don't know.  But given that the MKBH ranked behind the 5th Avenue Apple Store, I don't think it's really a big honor.  KarlM (talk) 04:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your subjective opinion that a hotel that was honored by the American Institute of Architects twice and has been written about quite extensively now is "pedestrian" is noted, but individual users subjective opinions are not proper basis in deciding article inclusion.  We go by coverage from independent reliable sources.  If you feel this topic fails WP:NOTABILITY (ie, you feel it has not received significant coverage by reliable sources), then send it to AFD and see what happens.  And about that Hana Hou article "New Life for An American Icon", it only explained part of the process.  According to the AIA website, 2,448 AIA members nominated 247 structures (were talking out of all millions of structure in the US) and 1,804 Americans choose their preferences out of 78 randomly selected from that 247.   Also remember that the first AIA honors in the 1960s was solely based on AIA members opinions.  And since you're valuing the ranking, it was ranked ahead of Rockefeller Center, Transamerica Pyramid, Crystal Cathedral and the Guggenheim Museum amongst many others. --Oakshade (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that single user's opinions shouldn't be the basis of notability, but I hope you weren't trying to convince me.  The fact that all of those buildings ranked behind both the MKBH and the Apple Store, and the methods behind it, just reinforces my view that it's pretty much a worthless honor.  You still haven't mentioned what's notable about it?  Am I missing something?  I haven't been able to find many pictures online, but from the overview aerial shot it looks blocky, like a hundred similar resorts.  Not very different, in fact, from the Hapuna Prince next door, but slightly less pleasing to my eye.  KarlM (talk) 07:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Don't know which "preview" site you're referring to, but reliable sources provide validity to the content and placing citations should always be encouraged.--Oakshade (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Oh, I thought you were talking about the references.  I agree with you on that one.--Oakshade (talk) 00:43, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

text: It's not a "pay preview", it's a dead link; the domain owner is offering to sell the name.  KarlM (talk) 09:48, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mauna Kea Beach Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110510113118/http://favoritearchitecture.org/afa150.php to http://favoritearchitecture.org/afa150.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3A9IfPBvE0HOoJ%3Awww.hawaii.aaa.com%2Fhi_westways%2FPages%2F0909-mauna-kea.aspx%20%22welcome%20home%22%20%22Mauna%20Kea%20beach%20hotel%22&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mauna Kea Beach Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727184759/http://prft.org/index.php/prft/RICHARD_PALMER_SMART to http://prft.org/index.php/prft/RICHARD_PALMER_SMART
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3A9IfPBvE0HOoJ%3Awww.hawaii.aaa.com%2Fhi_westways%2FPages%2F0909-mauna-kea.aspx%20%22welcome%20home%22%20%22Mauna%20Kea%20beach%20hotel%22&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013034427/http://www.princeresortshawaii.com/mauna-kea-resort-hawaii.php to http://www.princeresortshawaii.com/mauna-kea-resort-hawaii.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified