Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Screenwriters

message: Bruno Heller and Alan Ball are some of the articles that list the TV episodes they worked on.  Is this something you do when the screenwriter's body of work is basically that show?  If this was Aaron Sorkin or Josh Schwartz it could be an eyesore.  What to do?  Not care, and move on?-BiancaOfHell 20:47, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  I think each article on a Screenwriter will be different depending on how much is known about them, and what kind of work they have under their belt.  I'd like to see an article about a Screenwriter who wrote no more than one teleplay, and has an entire article about his family, his farm, and some travel adventures.-BiancaOfHell 08:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got one for you David H. Melnick. He has written just one episode of The Wire according to IMDb, now we just need to locate his farm! A filmography is useful for a freelance writer and for most staff writers but for head writer types it would become unwieldy. Is it worth trying to standardise presentation for the writers that we do include an extensive filmography for?--Opark 77 23:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing TV episodes of screenwriter

message: *Is it legal/correct to include external links to the screenplays that are found on the web?
*Is a Credits section, a Filmography section, a case by case decision, or something else appropriate for listing all the works of the screenwriter? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BiancaOfHell (talk • contribs) 12:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: Hi, this project seems to be a sub-project of both WP Films and WP Biographies. I suggest its expansion to include actors, directors and cinematographers. This is something often, and recently again, discussed between WP Film members and seems to be a very useful addition. By expanding, it would also get more members participation and would cover a very needed area. I have noticed that WP Biography members are often overwhelmed by all the incoming film crew and cast articles and apart from some famous actors and directors, most articles remain underdeveloped. I would be glad to help with this project if it grows to cover all our film biography needs. Hoverfish Talk 15:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thought, we could leave out actors, which seems to be a sub-project that could stand on its own, and extend this project to "WikiProject Film Crew". Hoverfish Talk 15:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your proposed "WikiProject Film Crew" is a good idea, and both Wikiprojects could complement each other, but I think they should stay separate.  I look more at the amount of work that needs to be done on the Screenwriter articles, rather than the number of participants, and there's a huge amount of work to be done.  I agree about leaving out actors.  I think addressing the articles on "directors, cinematographers, film editors and film music composers" is a great idea.  I think the best course of action atm is to let a few Wikiprojects try to cover what they can and then merge somewhere down the road if it makes sense.-BiancaOfHell 08:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Widening the Project? 

message: It has been proposed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2007/February that a generic :Category:Screenwriter stubs be created, to complement the existing :Category:American screenwriter stubs. If you agree, please support it. Hoverfish Talk 14:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Screenwriters exists and its subcategory :Category:Screenwriters by nationality has lots of categories. If you meant to disband the American screenwiter stub, this you can specify/correct. Thanks for the support. If you need any technical assistance, please ask me anytime. Hoverfish Talk 21:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems redundant.  Aaron Sorkin is listed under :Category:Screenwriters and :Category:American Screenwriters.  Is there a  :Category:American?-BillDeanCarter 05:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New generic screenwriter stub proposal

message: I have no idea what this entails.  I envision it as a collection of articles that are relevant to the screenwriting process.  As well as biographies of screenwriters, telewriters, script doctors, etc...  Links to interviews with Screenwriters possibly.  Maybe a monthly newsletter on what's happening, a link in to WikiNews.  There are possibilities.  Maybe a spotlight on today's screenwriters and yesterday's screenwriters.  Such as Aaron Sorkin and Preston Sturges and it would change every month.  Maybe a quirk article could be featured every month too.  I'm in no hurry to get this done, so this is all thinking atm.-BillDeanCarter 22:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenwriters portal

message: Hello.  I recently self-nominated the article on the recent Academy Award winner for Best Adapted Screenplay, William Monahan at WP:FAC.  Please read the article and comment, as well as copyedit if you wish.  It's a fascinating read.-BillDeanCarter 20:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[William Monahan]] article under review at FAC

message: Hi please see the new Wikiproject proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals.
We are aiming to start Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers which will encompas all bio articles related to cinema. 
Please see User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld/Film biography page model. It would be great if your project could unite with this new project and work as a section of it. Thanks  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "I've been expecting you" 19:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film biography

message: Thought people interested in this project might like to know that :Category:Women screenwriters is being considered for deletion. — scribblingwoman 02:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't been able to figure out categories.  For every single category that is about a human being, there could be a female version of it.  Has something like a derived category been invented yet?  Derived categories would be great, because someone might want to know about all the Women who have been screenwriters, as well as authors.  And other curious stuff.  I can understand the importance about knowing about every single woman screenwriter out there, especially for women seeking such a career.  But what's the best way to go about it?-BillDeanCarter 07:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I populated the Women Screenwriters category, so now it doesn't look so nekkid.  I am sure there are more out there to include. EraserGirl (talk) 01:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category "women screenwriters" up for discussion 

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers has started. I addressed it to everyone before but noone seemed to listen.  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦  "Expecting you" Contribs 14:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers

message: I've posted a complete rewrite to this article, including filmography, tables of his tv work and awards. I'm looking for feedback, suggestions, assessments, whatever you have. Therefore 18:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[David E. Kelley]]

message: Wikipedia does not need more project banner. Please if you're serious about starting this new project, work as a subgroup of the new WikiProject Biography Film department. If you're not serious about building and maintaining a seperate project, why don't you just join them? --kingboyk 13:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because I'm a megalomaniac, and I decided that Screenwriters, who work in both Film and Television, were important enough to deserve their own WikiProject.  I think WikiProject Biography has some excellent rules, and I would like to align with them, but WikiProject Screenwriters is a simple place where others who are writing about scriptwriters can show up and see what others have done.  Let it evolve.  It's neither a redlink nor a subgroup of WikiProject Biography, but somewhere in between at the moment.-BillDeanCarter 22:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You both have valid points, most screenwriters don't do any one thing. They cross from film to stage to television as well as publishing.  I think leaving the screenwriters project as a sub project of project film is harmless enough. Besides, there are plenty sillier and pointless projects on wikipedia and if we didn't, what would I DO all day?  EraserGirl (talk) 15:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please, not another project banner 

message: is this project still active?  i haven't seen much movement lately. EraserGirl (talk) 05:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the low level of activity and complete redundancy (guideline-wise) with Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, I would strongly advocate merging. There is nothing that can't be done there, and participation appears to be more active. Furthermore, it will allow more active engagement in the context of all filmmaker bios, which is important since many writers also have other creative roles over the course of their careers. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: entirely understandable. It was kinda lonely.  I made a personal list of quite a few dead women screenwriters who need 'real' biographies.  It may take me a while but then they're dead, they aren't in a rush.  EraserGirl (talk) 06:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Myself, I find it odd that the organizer of the project hasn't responded to any notes left on the project page. I don't quite know how you would go about it, but if it were me, I'd propose that the project be merged into a child of another project, perhaps simply the WP:WikiProject Film as a sister project to WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. It would still grant autonomy to this project without tying it up too much with the actors portion. Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

text:  I have managed to stir up something @ WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#WikiProject_Screenwriters & Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biography#WikiProject_Screenwriters though I am not quite sure if I am just failing about regarding a topic of only interest to myself. EraserGirl (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: activity?

message: I have been working closely with other editors on the proper formatting for the articles I have written and come up with a template which I will be employing for the rest of my articles.  Granted, the articles I have been working on are not as extensive and thorough as Aaron Sorkin or William Monahan but then I am working with mostly the dead and unpopular who have been obscured by time.  My aim is to start with a  uniform template and as I do more research, accumulate additional material for those still lacking. Of course this is just a bare bones template but it helps to remember which parts go where and what still needs doing.  I would like to work on creating some lists, both of male and female screenwriters whose articles aren't even past the Stub phase yet. EraserGirl (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenwriters' Template

message: Why the hell aren't we doing anything?  Come on guys! User:Magicbullet5 (talk) 19:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome! it's you and me pal until someone else shows up. Got any ideas? EraserGirl (talk) 20:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: :Welcome! it's you and me pal until someone else shows up. Got any ideas? EraserGirl (talk) 20:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: !

message: An important discussion on " Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ?  " is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - , member of WikiProject Council.  14:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A discussion 

message: They are Timeline of the 2007–2008 Writers Guild of America strike and Reaction by actors to the 2007-08 Writers Guild of America strike, just to let you know. Dalejenkins |  13:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 articles from this Wikiproject are up for deletion

message: Aaron Sorkin has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Featured article review/Aaron Sorkin.  An editor seems to disagree with what this article said just a few days ago and has removed many references and substantially rewritten the article.  I fear the changes are WP:POV.  Please review and comment.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aaron Sorkin at FAR 

message: nominated William Monahan for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 21:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notifying of featured article review of [[William Monahan]] 

message: This message is being sent to WikiProjects with GAs under their scope. Since August 2007, WikiProject Good Articles has been participating in GA sweeps. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the GA criteria. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.
We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.
If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps invitation

message: If this screenwriter is notable enough, I will be glad to contribute an article, but I don't want to do it if it will be deleted.  Here is his obit: http://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/20/obituaries/christopher-gore-45-screenwriter-of-fame.html.  Let me know what you want to do, thanks.Jarhed (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christopher Gore 

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  02:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: Deletion review discussion regarding Golden Raspberry Award winners, please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 1. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion review discussion - Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners 

message: I've taken an interest in this WikiProject, and joined (as the first new member in some time) recently.  I have started by adding the WikiProject template to various articles on screenwriters.  The template is a bit simplistic compared to most others, with no image and no article grading system and I wonder if we shouldn't add the 'typing monkey' or some other picture to it.  As for the lack of a grading system, I have come to like it.  So, assuming anyone else is checking in here, thoughts? Jusdafax  07:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it typing monkey needs the work.  kudos for resurrecting the project. EraserGirl (talk) 23:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks EraserGirl. I'm happy to talk larger goals than this, as you see fit, since I see you are a long-timer here.  The past few days have been busy in 'real life' but I'm hoping to roll up my sleeves here soon. Jusdafax  17:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The template 

message: I have updated the wording of the 'Announcement banner' to reflect the current situation here.  Also, I have deleted the WikiProject memberships of two members; one (sadly, this WikiProject's founder) indef blocked for several years, and the other retired from Wikipedia. Jusdafax  21:38, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated 'Announcement banner', trimmed membership list 

message: Please come comment at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_March_22#Category:Academy_Award_for_Best_Original_Screenplay_templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:33, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note, I'll look into this. Jusdafax  17:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  CFD notification 

message: Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay1940-1949 has been nominated for merging with Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay 1940-1960. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  02:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for merging]] of [[Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay1940-1949]] 

message: I'm back after a bit of a hiatus. Do we have any other members who consider themselves 'active'?  Personally my focus is women screenwriters preferably those who are both obscure and dead. I have done some more notable ones but basically i choose my subjects by the availability of research material.  If i can find a book or a bio on the subject that gives me a leg up.  Most writers were just journeymen who did their job in obscurity, and hence no additional material is available.  I have a love hate relationship with Frederica Sagor Maas, if it weren't for her own salacious autobiography she would die in obscurity, but because of her book many other hollywood histories are a little more saucier. I am a little uncomfortable with the casual acceptance of her book as a definitive reference, she wrote it very very very late in life and could very easily be exaggerating. I intend to continue with my concentration, if you should stumble on one you think needs attention please point it out.  Does anyone else have their own specialties? EraserGirl (talk) 23:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I have resumed adding the project template and stub template to screenwriter articles.  Slow but sure... Jusdafax  06:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Second update: Things continue to be slow here. I do add our project templates to screenwriter article talkpages from time to time. I am confident that at some point in the future, activity at this page will pick up, with new members and fresh energy. Jusdafax  08:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New goals and concentations

message: I have nominated this article for the WP:MAINPAGE for 24 December, the 3rd anniversary of his death. Comments at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests would be appreciated. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Harold Pinter]] 

message: I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#Reformating_Emmy_Awards_episodic_Directing_and_Writing_templates regarding reformatting , ,  and . The intention is to make them look more like , ,   and  in hopes of encouraging editors to work on the most critically acclaimed episodes and highlight the most critically acclaimed episodes for the readers.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  06:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformating selected [[Emmy Awards]] templates 

message: I started a discussion on this article's talk page suggesting that the page be moved to David Webb Peoples since the screenwriter is always credited with his full name.  I would like to hear the opinions of other editors on this matter.  Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 16:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[David Peoples]] 

message: May I ask when WikiProject Screenwriters will get an Assessment department, please? --Buspirtraz (talk) 03:14, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As you can see from the above, the last few years have been quite slow, but with four new members in 2013 so far, we have come a long way towards being an active WikiProject again. I feel that tagging screenwriter article Talkpages with our "typing monkey" template is a way to alert interested parties to our existence, and urge all to do so as possible. I am open to suggestions on the formation of an Assessment department. Since our template does not currently include assessments, that would have to be provided for. I would suggest at least three active members. Jusdafax  21:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Department 

message: I'd like to dust off the Project Page by deleting the 'Featured Screenwriter' photo and the three 'Current collaborations.' I'd also like to add to or revamp completely the 'Goals' section. If there is no objection, I'll take a whack at it in the next week or two. Jusdafax  05:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to delete portions of our Project Page 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hi, an image was twice removed at Kirsten Smith (writer). I would like a second opinion. See Talk:Kirsten Smith (writer). All the best, Taketa (talk) 07:01, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image yes or no 

message: I don't know how to rename a page, but Jason Hall (actor) needs to be changed to Jason Dean Hall. He has no acting credits for the last nine years and has at least three produced screenplays in the past 5 years, two of which are in WP — Paranoia (2013 film) and American Sniper (film). See the Talk page for details: Talk:Jason Hall (actor). —Blanchette (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, the move is done. —Blanchette (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jason Dean Hall article makeover needed 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Be advised that there is an WP:RFC at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#RFC:_Filmography_navboxes with the intent of creating a general rule to support deleting templates at :Category:Film producer navigational boxes, :Category:Film writer navigational boxes, :Category:Television producer templates, :Category:Television creator templates, and :Category:Television writer templates.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creator template RFC 

message: Hey everyone, just checking in. I'm new to editing Wikipedia and looking to contribute to this project in whatever way my limited knowledge lets me. From checking the talk page there doesn't seem to be too much activity, or are you all just a quiet bunch?  No Relation Wayne (talk) 03:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone still here? 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether :Portal:Aaron Sorkin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Aaron Sorkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 02:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Portal:Aaron Sorkin]] for deletion 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I work for Executive Writing, and as part of my consultancy work, I work with United Talent Agency. I am hoping an editor will be willing to add UTA CEO Jeremy Zimmer, Dore Schary’s grandson, to the infobox and personal life section of Dore Schary's page. The source for this can be found here []. I appreciate any help from editors, as a COI editor I will not make these changes myself. EWChristine (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dore Schary Grandson 

message: Hi. There are a series of omissions and a few mistakes in the article about screenwriter Adam McKay, known for directing and co-writing films such as The Big Short (film) (2015),  Vice (2018 film).  He also directed and co-wrote  Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004), Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby (2006), Step Brothers (2008), The Other Guys (2010), and Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013),  all of which he co-wrote with creative partner Will Ferrell. I have a conflict of interest as I work for McKay. I’ve written up proposals to improve the article as “Request Edits” here: Talk:Adam McKay#“Help with article updates/corrections”  I’ve tried my best to abide by all Wikipedia policies - including NPOV and Verify but it needs an independent review to abide by Wikipedia policies.  While I have added these to the Request Edit official queue, it appears that almost no one is answering this queue anymore -- requests have been sitting there since July.  So if anyone here might like to review this article, highly relevant to this project, I would really appreciate it. Please feel free to reach out with questions. Thanks!  Losangeles48 (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with article about well-known screenwriter 

message: Hello,Please note that Astrid Lindgren, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! 
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! 

message: I have nominated Satyajit Ray for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for Satyajit Ray