lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Drifblim

message: That image of Fuwaraido is obviously from an improperly sourced website. I say it needs to be either taken down or the link needs to be redone to show where you truly got the picture from. That link leads to a japanese Flash website, so I find it hard to believe that you got it from there. 195.195.15.250 15:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it?  Seems exactly like the 3rd gen art to me.  And does it really matter; are you concerned about copyright stuff or inaccuracy?  BenpV2 19:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One: This post is from November 2006. It's obviously moot by now. And two: yes, copyright does matter.—ウルタプ 21:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Is this actually the official U.S. name or is it totally made up? Floramage! 21:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was on the Toy Fair 2007 merchandise, apparently. But now Serebii is saying the name is Drifblim. I have reservations about using Serebii as a source for this, but Driftblim wasn't sourced either... So what should we do about this? —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 19:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what to do, actually. I mean, we could wait patiently until Nintendo OFFICIALLY(to all of you speculators out there) announces the name of Fuwaride/Driftblim/Drifblim. Or we could edit like crazy when someone changes the name uncited. You're choice, sweetie.- Floramage! 23:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Driftblim?
Talk:Garchomp

message: Isn't the game out?  I believe it was acquired by a few people who got it from their local store early, so we'll have to wait and see for the English names.  Can't wait for Sunday.  BenpV2 05:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The game is not officially out for about another day where I am (Pacific Time Zone). -Jeske (v^_^v) 06:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Released? 

message: Oops nevermind, I did not realize they were unreliable. Stefonational 20:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New English name 

message: After User:Eriorguez C&P'd Gablias into Garchomp, I added it to the list of articles needing moved at WP:RM. -Jeske (v^_^v) 20:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  C&P 

message: Is that section about a good moveset really necesary? This isn't Smogon, and no other Pokemon pages list movesets or in depth strategies.
:No - see WP:NOT#IINFO. -Jeske (v^_^v) 03:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moveset

message: Before I post it I was thinking Garchomp's  name origen is from the word gargantuant and chomp. Before i edit, please tell me if this is a good assumsion or not.
:No - Garchomp can't outinch Yao Ming, so how can he be "gargantuan?" -Jeske (v^_^v) 02:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name origin 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because the image was listed for reuse, and it was the only image to be available under such conditions --Professor Profession (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Bridlington Town A.F.C.

message: Has anyone got any images of the ground that can be used here and at the Scarborough Athletic F.C. article? Keith D (talk) 22:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ground images
Talk:Mothim

message: Confirms—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DSDark (talk • contribs) 16:57, 20 April 2007  (UTC)
:Wtc??? Explain, please. – mcy1008 (talk) 20:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry pokemon-games.com confirms the its name as Mothim--DSDark 22:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be more specific. The site is very big. In any case, I've found it. – mcy1008 (talk) 22:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mothim 

message: Please change the name of this article to Mothim. Thank you. Fox will rock 22:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to request it yourself. Also, no one moved it again, as it was not moved in the first place. It's a Bad Thing to move a page via cut-and-paste. Now, as you've given Mothim significant Help:History (whoops!), we don't only have to wait an hour and six minutes; we have to wait until an admin moves it. – mcy1008 (talk) 22:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Gliscor

message: How come this guy's under "Fictional Gargoyles" and not "Fictional Vampires"? Please explain.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seven-point-Mystic (talk • contribs).
:I don't know. I'll check the history to see what the reason was to add it.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 04:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not. I'll remove it, since Glion isn't really a gargoyle. Also, Glion appears to be the only page in the category at this time.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 04:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: This refers to "Glion", a town in Switzerland and any article about this should be called Glion, Switzerland (3 links to it) as it has nothing to do with this Glion. (make that 4 links)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peter Horn (talk • contribs).
:I'll put in a note at the top of the page.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 04:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Swiss postal codes 1000-1999]]

message: Is the method in the article correct?
-- M C Y 1008 09:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glion evolution? 

message: Please change it. Thank you.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wolf Link 555 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 5 April 2007  (UTC)
:Any source for this, apart from Serebii. Thankyou. AxG ۝۝۝҈ ►talk►guests 17:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to comply with Wikipedia:Reliable sources, so no. – mcy1008 (talk) 21:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name is Gliscor
Talk:Heatran

message: For the last time, whoever you are. HYDORA is the official romanization. Get that in your head. DarknessLord | T | C 21:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So shouldn't this be under "Hiidoran"? -JC 01:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be under Hīdoran. Hydoran, I'm not sure where it came from, but it's a logical way of translating, looking at other romanizations. Hydora striaght has no source. DanPMK 10:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a source, I'm changing all references back to Hiidoran.  My edit comment will point here. Magaroja 23:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydora/Hydoran 

message: Is Heatran the official Romanization of this Pokémon's name, or is it the name leaked to several fansites such as Serebii.net? Also, does anyone have any idea what the creature Heatran was based upon could be? Most likely some mythical magma creature, I assume, but I'm not sure. I'd like to know in order to further expand upon its Biological characteristics section.- Floramage! 16:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and Creature It Was Based Upon 

message: Chaw, Heatran. That's it's official name. DO NOT QUESTION! If you do, God will [huff a kitten] and smite you. Thank you. -_-—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teh Winrar (talk • contribs) 22:05, 5 April 2007  (UTC)
:No. Serebii uses anonymous sources, so there is no way to confirm the accuracy of their report.  As such, we cannot use any of Serebii's information on Wikipedia. -Jeske (v^_^v) 23:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fail to see how this matters, considering the article already uses Heatran (in the context of it being the trademarked romaji for the Japanese name, but the article does so nevertheless). – mcy1008 (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure I need not say this, but of course Heatran is the official name.  I have played the game and seen it, also.  --Ksy92003 12:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEATRAN! 

message: It doesn't look genuine to me, you? BenpV2 01:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: New topics to the bottom. And yes, it's official. It's from the Japanese DP site.—ウルタプ 01:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Art?
Talk:Shinx

message: Does anyone have an idea of what the "link" part of Kolink's name comes from?  I mean, the "ko" part could possibly refer to the Japanese word for "child", but I just don't know about "link"--67.87.66.127 00:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The picture that Mitsumasa cited as showing the name Shinx is also the one that people believed said Spinx, Spine, et cetera. I'll be reverting this move, but if anyone objects, they can revert me.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 22:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, if anyone wants to move the page, I request them to give their rationale here. Thanks. =] —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 23:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shinx
Talk:Bromley F.C.

message: The article on a club of Bromley's stature is always going to rely heavily on fans to keep it up to date, but NPOV priorities mean that fans need to be careful to curb their enthusiasm in editing Wiki pages.  Whether the team is promising, and whether anybody was impressed by recent victories, are matters of opinion.
I am not confident enough of my facts to make the edit, but I think that Bobby Bowry played for Gravesend and Northfleet, not Fleet Town.  I would have thought his Crystal Palace (and Charlton?) days would merit a mention in introducing him as well. Kevin McE 12:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy and neutrality

message: The team's logo has recently changed. Would it be possible to update the logo right now, or would permission be required as the image is presumably under copyright? I'm not familiar with how this is supposed to work, but the logo on the article right now is out of date and in need of an update as soon as possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krimzonmania7078 (talk • contribs) 11:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. You actually replaced the file correctly, but then undid it for some reason (I guess you couldn't see that it had changed as it sometimes requires the cache to be cleared before the new version appears (which you can do by pressing CTRL and F5). However, the file you uploaded was too large – non-free files are limited to being a maximum of 100,000 pixels in size. Number 57 15:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Team Logo
Talk:Mamoswine

message: Why is manmoo named that?
He's no man, he's no cow, he's a wolly man... oh what, MANmoth....
well, what about the moo?
:It's the Japanese Romanization. -Jeske (v^_^v) 20:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insane name 

message: I have learned that Manmoo's english name is Mamoswine.Manmoo is my favorite pokemon so I think the article should state its english name
--Mamoswineman 00:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh? Could you provide the reliable source you learned this from? :) —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 00:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: But neither reveal their sources.  Next! -Jeske (v^_^v) 21:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mamoswine

message: Is Piloswine really from Diamond and Pearl? No. It is from Gold and Silver.--Zancloor 13:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Piloswine evolving doesn't happen until Diamond an Pearl. Read, yo. :[—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 16:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From Diamond and Pearl?
Talk:Yanmega

message: I heard something about a lickitng involved with evolution of this pokemon, could someone explain to me please? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Felinoel (talk • contribs) .
nope, no connection. wherever you heard that obviously isnt a reliable source.--chaosemeraldking 21:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My question was not that? But it was answered by Tempest. felinoel (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the video-games
Talk:Wormadam

message: The type in the box is only listed as bug/grass, while that's only part of the type for this pokemon...can we fix that somehow? Niki Whimbrel 16:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I came up with something and put in a request for it to be implemented at Template talk:Pokémon species.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 22:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: infobox

message: As I inquired in the Talk:Minomutchi discussion page, how would the format for detailed description of Minomadam's body (as its coat from being a Minomutchi is now apparently fused with its body) be?- Floramage! 16:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Body Forms of Minomadam 

message: Wormadam....... period.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sonic,Pikachu,and Snorunt (talk • contribs).
:Unconfirmed... period. -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  %( 

message: I'm just curious on what the pink fluff the trash form is cover with is supposed to be, because I truly have no idea, I find it even a bit odd for that form to be referred to as a trash form, given that I see no evidence of this anywhere really. -Anonymous
:It's referred to as "trash cloak" in the Nintendo Power guide. Most of us are of the belief it's actually building insulation.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 15:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trash form
Talk:Buckingham Town F.C.

message: I propose that Buckingham Town F.C. be its own article. This merged club is a completely new entity and it's not exactly a phoenix club nor does there seem to be much linking it Buckingham the settlement, nor the former club in any way. Abcmaxx (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support a split. However, I would suggest the way it is done is that this article is moved back to Milton Keynes Robins (as it preserves the history of the article on that club (previously Buckingham Town)) and a new articles is created for MK Irish. Number 57 07:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support one article for Milton Keynes Robins including the Buckingham Town history, and another article for Milton Keynes Irish. Jess Cully (talk) 10:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Talk:Mismagius

message: Personally I love the new look of Misdrevious, but with the whole witch apperence, aren't people be going to think pokemon is evil again? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.81.118.197 (talk) 23:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I must agree with you. People look way too deep into these things. I also like Muumage's looks. The whole wich motif is just SO cool. All we can do is hope that no one tries to bring up the whole "Pokémon are evil beings" crap again. Floramage! 17:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, nowadays, it's not what one person thinks; it's what the Religious Right thinks. -Jeske (v^_^v) 23:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNN Headline waiting to happen?
Talk:List of Japanese idols

message: * Disagree. These "list" articles get pretty long. Subdividing them into separate articles by category helps. RickReinckens 22:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? There is no such thing as "Japanese Idol Models", they're both referring to the same thing. There is reason for a "Japanese Model" category, but not two articles with a list of the exact same thing.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  03:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Japanese idols models with Japanese Idols 

message: I've alphabetized the list, and removed all AV idols, singers, gravure idols, and pure models. Many seiyu and some gravure are borderline, so there may be some duplication there. There is now a List of Japanese gravure idols.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  12:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Excuse my ignorance, but, should this list be alphabetized by family name or given name. This list seems to be a mixture of both.  (Spellsgood (talk) 01:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to alphabetize 

message: Reason
-some bands not debut in forming year
-somebody want to know members ages when debut
-make easier to search retro j-pop music
* If we group by debut, then no one will find anything for sure, cause there are too many groups. (It's possible to create a table sortable by name and by year, but it would require some serious work... I can't do it in the near future... And I'm afraid the result will be useless and I will have to revert everything back anyway.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 21:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please grouping by debut years
Talk:Jiraiya

message: Can he summon or transform into a toad?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.144.10 (talk) 01:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summon or Transform 

message: And about "Tsunade, the slug; translated as Tsunade-hime" (I'm not even sure what this sentence was supposed to mean) - isn't "-hime" rather meaning a princess? 
Also Tsunade article is just relatively very poor. As of now I would merge-redirect her with the story article. --Asperchu (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why there's no [[Jiraiya Goketsu Monogatari]] article (and not just redirect)? 
Talk:Prinplup

message: Hey, PCP buds...What is the name of the evolved form of this guy? This page says Emperte, but the link leads to an Empurto or something? Please advise...Thanks!Niki Whimbrel 17:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Emperuto. Some prob or the other with romanizations. For now, it's best to use the name that the article's under. Cheers, The Raven's Apprentice(Profile|PokéNav|Trainer Card) 15:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Back to Emperte (me). It was originally moved by cut-and-paste from Emperte to Emperuto, so I'm not sure if what I did is alright (because of the histories and things) since I just reverted them. Anyway, Emperte is the trademarked romaji given on the Japanese trademark site: http://www1.ipdl.ncipi.go.jp/syutsugan/TM_AREA_A.cgi.-- M C Y 1008 05:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The games do not say what real life animal a Pokemon is based off of. Any indication of that basis is purely speculation by one person or many people in any article. shao 00:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Evolved form
Talk:Luxray

message: That image of Rentorā doesn't look like Ken Sugimori's artwork, does it? And We should continue calling it "Rentorā". Floramage! 04:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but Luxray hasn't been confirmed by any reliable sources and as such is not verifiable. That means it can't be reported as fact on Wikipedia. —M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 22:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image and Name 

message: my luxray is electric/dark maybe you guys should change it to what it really is or wahtever —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.199.194.15 (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How do we know you're not trying to BS us? -Jeske (v^_^v) 21:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, simple. We know he is. :)—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 03:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with type 

message: I have to disagree with the statement that Luxray has a poor moveset with regards to its high Attack stat.  Under the new attack system, all of Luray's moves with the exception of Discharge, its last, are all "physical attacks."
:Go nuts, but remember that you can't go into too much detail without turning it into a sreamsheet FAQ. -Jeske (v^_^v) 05:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack and Moveset
Talk:Rotom

message: i hear that rotom is classified as the alien gel pokemon. anyone know what said classification means? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.54.154.118 (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It means you heard wrong. It's classified as a plasma Pokémon. --ArrEmmDee 18:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I go with ArrEmmmDee. I have Platinum and Rotom's entry goes like this: Rotom: Plasma Pokémon. It can enter some machines and cause mischeif. Something like that. Well, you heard wrong. Rotom's Electric/Ghost types make Alien Gel sound no sense. sigh.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arceus493 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alien gel pokemon 

message: Is Rotom a legend? i heard this in beckett pokemon collectors list of legendary pokemon. are they right or wrong?--65.54.154.117 20:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  It's the same as Snorlax in R/B/Y/G/S/C/FR/LG, and Snorlax isn't even considered quasilegendary. -Jeske (v^_^v) 21:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But there were 2 Snorlax in all of the Kanto games (R/G/B/Y/FR/LG). --Jopasopa 14:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not in G/S/C - there was but one. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Well...you can get wild Eevee at the Mansion in DP...>>;—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 04:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot about that... My bad. SuperDT 06:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legendary Rotom? 

message: If anyone types in "Rotom" from now on, they my go to Rotom instead of the list that Rotom redirects to. Heh heh... if any one knows anything Rotom related add it on...until it might be erased and be reformed back into a redirect page. Uh...... bye!Arceus493 (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rotom Page
Talk:Luxio (Pokémon)

message: Why was this added? I don't think Rukushio even IS a cat... -Amarkov babble 00:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject CATS? 

message: Anyone but me thing that Luxio's name could be based off of the Luxo L1?--67.87.66.127 00:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's more likely that Luxio's name comes from either the city in Egypt, Luxor, or the Luxor Hotel in Las Vegas.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.215.171.63 (talk) 03:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's currently in the article is lux, the SI unit for illuminance, which seems about right.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 03:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Name Origin?
Talk:Skorupi

message: I've noticed that repeatedly, the idea that Skorupi's jap. name could've been a referrence to Scorpio has been removed.  Why?  It's not THAT improbable. Feats-O-Strength 21:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but scorpion is much more likely, and people kept changing it from Scorpius to Scorpio, when Scorpio is a disambiguation page and Scorpius is the constellation page... >.> – mcy1008 (talk) 22:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, one of Scorpio's meanings is just scorpion... – mcy1008 (talk) 22:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, there's absolutely nothing pointing toward Skorupi being a reference to a scorpion constellation as opposed to...just a scorpion.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ 22:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No zodiac referrence?
Talk:Cambridge R.U.F.C.

message: 1. Why is this included in the 'football (soccer)' project when it is an article about a rugby team?
2. The style of the article "we are delighted to report that our lads...." leaves it reading more like a match program potted history than an encyclopaedia entry.
Kit looks more like Sedgely Park than Cambridge.
Current kit is Red with Yellow flashes rather than traditional stripes.
With a change kit of Black and Red.
I need to work out how to edit it
80.3.80.20 (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)