lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pop Goes the Weasel (3rd Bass song)

message: Moved to Pop Goes the Weasel (3rd Base song) because Pop Goes the Weasel it itself a nursery rhyme i.e. a song; so this is to disambiguate.  Dunc_Harris|☺ 20:52, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Andrew L. Harris

message: Was there a reason for deleting all of the material in this revision? older≠wiser 21:19, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived discussion 
Talk:Plessey

message: I have removed:
:, and are interpreted in BCD.
as there is no explanation of what "BCD" is. Andy Mabbett 22:03, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: Some excellent changes to this once barebones and slightly inaccurate article, well done!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.148.24.14 (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 
Talk:Hürth

message: * I need help translating 'Oberkirchenrat' -- see the entry about Efferen -- into English. -- towo 22:41, 2004 Jun 20 (UTC)
: Termini are not to be translated. It is a clarc of the church-administration. --- It seems to me, nobody is interested in this english version. And no one will exercise translation in this matter. 87.78.157.244 15:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: An IP user added a handful of twin cities to the list here (and other city pages). I see no sources to validate them and I'm wondering if these changes need to be reverted. Does anyone have any indication that these changes are valid? Coastside (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious twin cities
Talk:Transit of Deimos from Mars

message: I found on this page that almost all the dates are crossed out. I suspect vandalism, but what is this really? Why is it crossed out if it can be just taken away from the article, so please, someone, edit it out.
--24.45.184.21 (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much crossing out!!!
Talk:Iranian Revolution

message: Hi. I'm looking for info about the mass killings. In particular the mass killings initiated after the revolutionary take over. Both the sporadic killings and the mass executions of political opponents. I couldn't find anything on this page. Maybe there are other pages specifically dedicated to this issue? Where are the Wiki-pages about all these killings? I can't find them. Thank you. RhinoMind (talk) 03:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: this is not the place - try the Wiki Desk 50.111.216.187 (talk) 22:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mass killings 

message: LouisAragon, if you can 'find a plethore of sources that dismiss the "broadening of education and healthcare" stuff', why have you not done so? If you disbelieve that the broadening of education and healthcare 'is a IRI project, and not a continuation of the Shah's policies', why have you not challenged this with evidence to the contrary? There ought to be a mention of the Revolution's effect on domestic policy in the lead, and a one-sentence summary of a section of the main text is hardly burdening the lead with excessive text. Stara Marusya (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The two sources didn't support that statement anyways . It was also quite vague, as it claimed this alleged "success" occurred "in recent years", yet the two cited sources were from 1994 and 2008, that's certainly not recent. The second source ironically didn't even talk about improvements under the IR, but the opposite, such as women "using their appearance and sexuality to fight the regime" and "Prospects for young people are not good and many graduates are lucky to get jobs as taxi drivers." --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert with odd edit summary 

message: Since Hijab in Iran is a pivotal issue for Khamenei, it is logical to make it so in the article. 2601:C4:C300:2890:A5F3:AE3C:9723:E346 (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hijab as a life-or-death issue
Talk:Diogenes Laertius

message: peace it yo. he was a baller. that just pretty much sums it up right thurr.
loveitttt. dig it.
His name seems Greek.  Is it known if he was Greek or Roman?  Am I correct in recalling that he wrote in Greek? john k 23:52, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I categorized him as a Roman because he was a person within the Roman Empire. If you object, there is another category, Roman era philosophers, which might be more appropriate, GreatWhiteNortherner 00:43, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: He was a Greek with Roman citizenship or, if you prefer, a Greek-speaking Roman (basically the same thing, in this context). Irrespective of his Roman citizenship, though, he most certainly identified himself as Greek as the introduction of his book makes unabashedly clear. Abvgd (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Nonsense. Porphyry wrote "Against the Christians." DL is likely 3rd century. Zeusnoos 22:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think I needed to be insulted. It isn't nonsense to ask a question. LCecere 18:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Since there is nothing known about Diogenes at all, except for his authorship of Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, it seems rational to merge the two articles. I sounded this out on the Classical Greece and Rome Wikiproject and there seemed to be broad agreement that in cases like this, where the author is a cypher, merging was probably sensible. Furius (talk) 03:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A key question, though, is the direction of the merge. I'd favour a merge to the Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers (that is, opposite to the direction of the templates) as it is the work and its transmission which is notable rather than the historian. It's usual to cover the event, not the person, implying that the 'event' (book) should take precedence. Klbrain (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case it is preferable to redirect to Diogenes Laërtius, because Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers is a modern title, not the original one. Most sources mention "Diogenes Laërtius" rather than Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. T8612 (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally forgot about this! Yes, that's the sensible direction of travel. Furius (talk) 01:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers
Talk:Rick Sutcliffe

message: Did anybody hear him in the Padres's booth the other night?  He was ripped!!!  He started talking about George Clooney and Darfur.
- Yes, and why is it the producer's fault that he made a drunken ass of himself?
I removed the part blaming the producer.  Also, while drunkenness is certainly a strong possibilty, is there proof that alcohol was the cause, rather than something else?  Looking up articles detailing the incident, I can't find anything definitively stating that Sutcliffe was drunk. Venknat 00:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't mean the whole section should be removed. Thesacrificebunt (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DRUNK

message: Wasn't this man nicknamed The Red Baron? -The Bold Guy- 14:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname 
Talk:USSR State Prize

message: Should people who win the "Lenin Peace Prize" be listed as having won the "Stalin Peace Prize"?  This seems misleading to me. john k 23:59, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Put a note in the article saying when (what year) the name changed (if you know when it did) →Raul654 17:56, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
It's actually the same prize. When the name was changed the Soviet government wrote all the previous recipients and asked them to send in their Stalin Prizes so they could be replaced with Lenin Prizes. AndyL 23:36, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: It's not the same prize! In the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (3rd edition) is written, that Lenin Prize was established in 1925, in 1935-1957 it was not awarded at all and since 1957 it was awarded again  According to the Great Soviet Encyclopedia Stalin Prize was awarded between 1940-1952. In 1966 when USSR State Prize was established, diplomas and badges of Stalin Prize were changed by diplomas and badges of USSR State Prize. USSR State Prize is the award different from the Lenin Prize, it was awarded since 1966 , see also . So, to sum it up, Lenin Prize established June 23 1925 and was awarded April 22 (Lenin's birthday) of each year in 1926-1934 and 1957-1990. USSR State Prize was established in 1940 and was awarded in 1940-1952 and 1966-1991 (in 1940-1952 it was called Stalin Prize). To avoid future placings of Lenin Prize award winners  into Stalin Prize article you must correct your mistake as soon as possible, or I'll correct it anyway writing the article USSR State Prize with redirect from Stalin Prize. Cmapm 15:36, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Should we add a category for Stalin prize laureates?--Nixer 15:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ru.wiki has one. --jno 16:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Did Okudzhava really win the last USSR State Prize in art and literature? I mean, it would be kind of awesome, but not only is it not cited, I can’t find a corroborating news report of any kind (or even a contradictory one). Cherry Cotton (talk) 02:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okudzhava 

message: Here are a few listed at an academic institution. We really need a full list form the issuing body though. Rich Farmbrough, 23:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: I propose to split the article into USSR State Prize and List of the USSR State Prize laureates/recipients. The article is too long and the names will keep adding. There was a similar proposal on this talk page many years ago, it seems now it's about time. Less Unless (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal
Talk:Judith (poem)

message: Why is this separate from Judith? Wetman 00:04, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: 'Opposite of Judith’s portrayal in the Book of Judith, her character is rendered blameless and virtuous.'As I have just written a paper on Judith, I know this to be false. Jerome, in the Vulgate, adds two verses praising Judith's chastity to the Hebrew original:
quae cum exisset ad illum benedixerunt illam omnes una voce dicentes tu gloria Hierusalem tu laetitia Israhel tu honorificentia populi nostril, quia fecisti viriliter et confortatum est cor tuum eo quod castitatem amaveris et post virum tuum alterum non scieris ideo et manus Domini confortavit te et ideo eris benedicta in aeternum’
[And when she had come out to him, they all blessed her with one voice saying: you are the glory of Jerusalem, you are the joy of Israel, you are the honour of our people, for you have done this in a manly way, and your heart has been strengthened, because you loved chastity, and you have not known any other man after your husband and therefore also the hand of the Lord hath strengthened you, and therefore you shall be blessed for ever]
, and Rabanus Maurus (9th c.) discusses her impeccable virtue at length. The author of the Judith poem would almost certainly have drawn on the Vulgate, and not obscure Hebrew versions of the text (of which only late copies survive), thus he would have been familiar with Jerome's addendum. Given Maurus' temporal and geographical proximity, I believe it reasonable to posit that the poet would have known either directly or indirectly of Maurus' commentary on the Book of Judith.  
I believe it fallacious to simply state that the Vulgate Judith does not exhibit similar virtuosity to the Old English rendering of her character, but it is true that stylistically, as is wont for many Old English poets, her epithets and the lengthy descriptions of the extent to which God loves her do emphasise these aspects of her character. I would like to edit the article myself to address these issues, but would like to hear opinions on the matter first. 
--Nihil impossibile arbitror.  23:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd, over-definite wording.
Talk:Culture of the United Kingdom

message: Hello editors,
I think this article and the subsequent content might be accidentally conflating two slightly different topics. Although the article title refers to 'Culture of the United Kingdom', the article then opens by calling the topic 'British culture', suggesting the two are interchangeable.
However, the two are not interchangeable. For example, Irish Catholic culture of Northern Ireland would fall under the category of Culture of the United Kingdom (and the definition provided by the lead, but certainly not British culture. On the other hand, there are aspects of British culture which fall outside the idea of the Culture of the United Kingdom. The Channel Islands, Isle of Man and British Overseas Territories are not part of the United Kingdom. Therefore their cultures do not make up part of the Culture of the United Kingdom. Their cultures do however make up part of British culture.
I therefore propose one of the following: (a) The article is moved to 'British culture' and content on non-UK British culture permitted, or (b) the reference to British culture in the lead is replaced with 'Culture of the United Kingdom'. I did not want to make any changes without consulting the wider community first. Thank you. Jèrriais janne (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 
Talk:Karl Lieberherr

message: This is a stub Page, shouldn't be deleted unless you think that adaptive Programming is not an encyclopedic theme. there is plenty of external links for people interested in expandig the theme.
:Why do you automatically think this page will be deleted?  That comment just makes the people who check these things (like myself) more suspicious. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 01:47, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's because this is very important to me, i have researched a lot for my tesis an i found that this concept wasn't in the wikipedia, i tought that it was important to include it even more when all thar research have been done by so many people. i wrote to people who is working in this, with the hope that them complete what i wrote. and it would be a shame that when an expert follow the link in the emails i sent, they found an empty page.--Arias Levhita 22:50, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
Karl did not introduce Aspect-Oriented programming as the page suggests (maybe he "introduced" it to a couple of students, but he did not invent the term or the concept).  He did, however, invent "the Law of Demeter" and DemeterJ.  --Werdnagreb 20:41, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tom Keating

message: Just now on 3sat! Austrian TV interviewed an art-restorer. She said that she will not try to restore Keating paintings because he buried explosives under the paint, he was a master chemist.
source 
Y23 (talk) 12:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: explosives

message: The term transformed into meaning "rhyming slang". 
The term is rhyming slang, in which the second element, providing the rhyme, is usually omitted. Like pretty much all specialized language of a closed group, rhyming slang moves from the closed group into general currency. (Pamour (talk) 21:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of the tiresome tautologies about what is an extremely familiar subject to speakers of British English; couldn't we simply jump-cut and link to the page on Rhyming Slang?Nuttyskin (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexton Blake 

message: wow
like relly WOW
AMAZING ART WORK  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayboo12334 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  wow 

message: Thomas[1] Patrick Keating[2] (1 March 1917 – 12 February 1984) 2A00:23EE:1248:BA41:D0AD:A11D:94A8:4A5B (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What seems not to be right? Candide1993 (talk) 04:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something is not right🤔
Talk:Wyperfeld National Park

message: The link to Black Box needs to be fixed!!!  I don't know where to point it.  Probably the article doesn't exist yet.  But obviously the disambiguation page to which it points is not the intended meaning. Michael Hardy 00:29, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed (eventually!). Maias (talk) 06:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:African National Congress

message: African nationalism & Social democracy at the same time? Thats bullshit! Like a flying Pig not possible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E6:FF2F:F593:4925:DA3C:4365:86C5 (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  political idantity 

message: Please note that the official website domain of www.anc.org.za is no longer operation due to a dispute with the hosting provider. It appears that the new address for the official site will be www.anc1912.org.za unless the domain dispute is settled amicably.
Background info here: News24 - ANC website battle: Party fails to secure ruling, wants to go to court instead
--96.43.180.53 (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official ANC website domain changed 

message: The IEC and every article you read says that the ANC got 53.91% of the vote in the 2016 Municipal Elections. And yet this page claims the ANC got 55.7%. Why is there a discrepancy in these two numbers? This page does not match the 2021 Municipal Election page, which says that the previous result of the ANC was 53.91%. The IEC website says so: https://results.elections.org.za/dashboards/lge/
But I'm not going to edit it, because I already edited it once and someone changed it. Someone needs to rectify this. This page differs in the 2016 result from other Wikipedia pages on it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:547:A00:2F0:D8CC:540E:5C82:1EB6 (talk) 21:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 Municipal Result Differs from Other Pages
Talk:Heart (disambiguation)

message: === Frequencies ===
106.2 has an even tenths digit, so how is it a possible FM radio station?? This must mean that other countries use their own rules. What is England's rule?? 66.245.92.131 01:12, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is very observant of you to notice such a thing, I am afraid I don't know the UK rules on this, but I have found confirmation that Heart broadcasts on 106.2FM (see http://www.heart1062.co.uk/ ). Having done some other research; I have found that FM stations have both even and odd tenths digits in the UK.  Perhaps http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/ may be of more use to you. SimonMayer 01:32, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: In the UK, the only rule about FM frequencies is that they're multiples of 0.1 MHz.  Radios with digital tuning typically have 0.05 MHz intervals, but I think that's just so that you can tune slightly off to escape interference from another station on a nearby frequency. -- Smjg 12:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think this is a perfectly suitable dab page and that merging it with Heart FM wouldn't make sense. Ben-w 17:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is refereing to the Heart FM dab page aswell, but if this page contains two of the three stations on the other page i think they should be merged. If there are no objections, ill do it. --Ballchef 02:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  FM 

message: 106.2 has an even tenths digit, so how is it a possible FM radio station?? This must mean that other countries use their own rules. What is England's rule?? 66.245.92.131 01:12, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is very observant of you to notice such a thing, I am afraid I don't know the UK rules on this, but I have found confirmation that Heart broadcasts on 106.2FM (see http://www.heart1062.co.uk/ ). Having done some other research; I have found that FM stations have both even and odd tenths digits in the UK.  Perhaps http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/ may be of more use to you. SimonMayer 01:32, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: In the UK, the only rule about FM frequencies is that they're multiples of 0.1 MHz.  Radios with digital tuning typically have 0.05 MHz intervals, but I think that's just so that you can tune slightly off to escape interference from another station on a nearby frequency. -- Smjg 12:49, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequencies 

message: :: I think this is a perfectly suitable dab page and that merging it with Heart FM wouldn't make sense. Ben-w 17:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is refereing to the Heart FM dab page aswell, but if this page contains two of the three stations on the other page i think they should be merged. If there are no objections, ill do it. --Ballchef 02:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heart FM 

message: Please, if you want to change something, build on what I've done, don't just revert to the previous mess. Thanks. Rothorpe (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganisation
Talk:Shah Rukh Khan

message: Shah Rukh Khan's honours are missing above his photos, Honours like Padma Shri by the government of Indi as well as the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres and Legion of Honour by the Government of France. Exper-maelstrom (talk) 20:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 December 2023 

message: Add his small son name AbRam Khan. Ocibul Ali (talk) 13:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Shadow311 (talk) 16:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2024 

message: The main Audio file and pronunciation guide of his name are not the same. I understand they are allophones in Hindi, but Shah Rukh grew up speaking Urdu. His name would not be pronounced that way. 182.182.198.151 (talk) 01:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The main audio file is mispronouncing his name.  

message: In the heading Career Fluctuations (1999-2001), it says:  Where in the source associated with this sentence explains the conflict? Because I've heard that Aishwarya Rai Bachchan was selected initially but was dropped and Rani Mukerji replaced her. In fact, this Rediff source itself says "Aishwarya Rai was originally signed on as Priya. Rani replaced her after Salman Khan interrupted the film's mahurat shot and created a scene, accusing Shah Rukh of getting too friendly with his girlfriend." Where in the source does it mention about the conflict between SRK and Juhi? We are the Great (talk) 02:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chalte Chalte
Talk:Marcy Walker

message: I'm not using embellishments when I say the GL role was tailor-made: they actually created the role for Miss Walker. TheCustomOfLife 02:15, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled