Talk:Ammunition dump

message: It seems to me as though this article and the article for Supply depot might overlap quite a bit. I found supply depot as a requested article and I created it, but then I realized that there might be quite a bit of overlap between the two. What do you think? MattW93 (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Supply depot

message: a proper layed out ammo dump, won't get levelled by fire in one or several igloos.  I do know some are poorly designed, and I've seen pictures from a US base in germany, where, due to area restrictions, the igllos are liaid out in tight rows.  But, where space permits, there are NATO standards for the layout, defining how to place igloos according to content (Classes 1-4 in the UN orange book) amount and such.  Firefighters won't generally attempt fire combatting class 1 and 2s, while while 3 and 4 can be attempted.  though contents may affect this.  for instance regular rifle/pistol ammunition is Classed as 4S and as such igloos containing only this can be worked on. while 3-4 igloos containing munitions such as WP smoke grenades and certain other pyrotechnics would likely be avoided.  Though the latter ones usually contain wery little in form of high capacty explosives, and thus a fire there should contain itself to the locale. Raymond Holmoey (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ammo dumps being levelled. 

message: I believe the term ammunition dump is a very broad term for any place where ammo is left. However the article lead stars with "An ammunition depot..." which is not exactly the same thing, because it has a more specific meaning.  The word dump implies something temporary, whereas depot sound more organised in nature. Danrok (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ammunition dump. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927181848/http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00222_2005%20Revised%20Dumping%20at%20Sea%20of%20chemical%20weapons.pdf to http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00222_2005%20Revised%20Dumping%20at%20Sea%20of%20chemical%20weapons.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927181739/http://www.ospar.org/v_publications/browse.asp?v3=53&lang=2 to http://www.ospar.org/v_publications/browse.asp?v3=53&lang=2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927181813/http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00287_overview%20of%20OSPAR%20assessments%201998-2006.pdf to http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00287_overview%20of%20OSPAR%20assessments%201998-2006.pdf#search=%22%22Overview%20of%20Past%20Dumping%20at%20Sea%20%22%20ospar%22
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I am not particularly knowledgeable about this topic, but I believe that the term 'Ammunitions dump' is often used to refer to permanent storage of ammunition (i.e. landfill), not a normal storage facility or repair shop. An example of this would be Beaufort's Dyke. Could this be put into the article? WT79 (speak to me | editing patterns | what I been doing) 08:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Ammunition dump' as a disposal site