Talk:Great Law of Peace

message: from talk:Gayanashagowa; WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 13:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As well, it proved that it isn’t necessary to be part of a state to be able to undertake diplomatic actions.  However, because the treaty was between non-state actors, Scholars of International Relations generally ignore it.
Karol 18:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV removed during [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Great_Law_of_Peace|AfD]] 

message: There is a NPOV dispute going on at Talk:Constitution, there is one editor who has declared himself to be an "expert" and has declared that there are "Principles of Successful Constitutions" without stating explicitly what the principles are, he is trying to write that they must come from Aristotle, Plato, and John Mason or else they "don't count" as successful Constitutions.  I responded that this was highly POV and gave a number of counter examples including this one, but by Circular logic, he argues that my examples don't count as "successful" because they didn;t come from Aristotle, Plato, and John Mason, therefore they cannot possibly be regarded as "successful".  Please share your comments. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 13:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC dispute at [[Constitution]] 

message: Re "rule of majority as opposed to consensus"... You do realize that some day, when all the dust has settled, Wikipedia will be remembered for centuries far and wide for originating and championing the notion that "consensus" can mean something opposed to the majority...  (and something set by an exclusive minority) You do realize this right?? 172.56.34.193 (talk) 12:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of article's pov pushing 

message: Hi - I'm proposing developing a section on published renditions grouped by nation-source given that the Great Law derives from renditions of the Epic of the founding of the Iroquois Confederacy. --Smkolins (talk) 22:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Got bold and just went and did it… :-) --Smkolins (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  a view to renditions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Law of Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150926130030/http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/publications/record/vol_01/pdfs/PreservingTradition.pdf to http://www.nysm.nysed.gov/publications/record/vol_01/pdfs/PreservingTradition.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:40, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I'm confused as to how the "Influence on the United States Constitution" section devotes more words to limiting the viewer's understanding of the influence of the treat on the US constitution rather than describing it. I'm assuming this is just a shitty attempt at propaganda. Does anyone elect to defend this section from editing? Bailey.d.r (talk) 09:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, it seems far more likely that the founding fathers were influenced by church structures (particularly Presbyterianism from Scotland) that were similarly elective and representative.  Madison, the father of the Constitution, was educated by Presbyterians after all.  It also seems unlikely that the Colonists would have drawn from the Iroquois considering they were British Allies during the Revolutionary War. 65.254.18.190 (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on constitution