Talk:List of municipalities of Connecticut by population

message: Okay, third time's the charm. This is a good target I think to merge the list from the main Connecticut article into. However I think a more descriptive title for this list would be "List of municipalities of Connecticut by Population"- That article currently redirects to this one (Thank you Polaron!) and I think the two might be better switched.--Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 04:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think merger is superfluous, now that this listing is known. Just remove the list from Connecticut, and cite the municipality list. Sort out the redirect issue later. -- Yellowdesk 04:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a day's wait to see if there are any strong objections would be a good idea. No need to start a revert war.--Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 05:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

text: True; how to handle the expectation of Californian readers who don't expect Hartford to be a town? -- Yellowdesk 05:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think a double listing is necessarily a bad thing, so long as it's parenthetically noted that the borough is part of the larger town.--Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 05:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: For later merging if needed:
*Bantam 808 (Litchfield)
*Danielson 4,285 (Killingly)
*Fenwick 54 (Old Saybrook)
*Groton Long Point 680 (Groton)
*Jewett City 3,001 (Griswold)
*Litchfield 1,340 (Litchfield)
*Newtown 1,835 (Newtown)
*Stonington 1,054 (Stonington)
*Woodmont 1,757 (Milford)
*Groton city 9,493 (Groton) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Polaron (talk • contribs) 05:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-town municipality figures 

message: This is from the Connecticut#Local_government section.  Should an edited version of this be put at the top of the list, to explain why the list is constructed the way it is? -- Yellowdesk 06:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh certainly. What with the pictures and all, this is already going to be an article/list hybrid. I'm just hoping nobody wants to add in the dis-incorporated cities like Willimantic; since it's only a census designated place now would that open the door to places like Crystal Lake?--Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 11:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that this list should be for places chartered somehow by the General Assembly regardless of how they're administered locally or whether they are CDPs. Oddball cases should be explained parenthetically.--Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 17:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  An explanatory paragraph desirable? 

message: Hi. I just put together a draft update for this page on my personal sandbox in preparation for "merging" that section from the main Connecticut page. Let me know what you think. --Elipongo (Talk|contribs) 04:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent work there. I think it's pretty much good to go. It would be useful, though, to mention which towns are also cities just so people not familiar with the Connecticut municipal structure aren't surprised when they see that Bridgeport, New Haven, Hartford are just towns. --Polaron | Talk 05:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft page up 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of municipalities of Connecticut by population. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203191755/http://www.cslib.org/boroughcity.htm to http://www.cslib.org/boroughcity.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified