lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Cobweb (novel)

message: -This article states that the author graduated from high school in 1966, but his own page lists his birth year as 1959.  Perhaps 1976 would be more likely?
→ Is it necessary to list the year of his graduation anyway?  This is an article about a novel, not the author.  Even worse: why are the longitude and latitude of the school (which may or may not be the basis of the fictional school) listed? -Hughtcool (talk) 00:21, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I removed it. Wyatt Riot (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: High School
Talk:Duke of St Albans

message: From the London Gazette for 24 March 1750:
:Whitehall, March 27
:The King has been pleased to grant the Dignity of a Baron of the Kingdom of Great Britain unto the Right Honourable Vere Beauclerk, Esq; commonly called Lord Vere Beauclerk, by the Name, Stile, and Title of Baron Vere, of Hanworth in the County of Middlesex.
So the title's "Baron Vere", not "Baron Vere of Hanworth". Proteus (Talk) 16:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The table has made the article unnecessary long, has removed the full names of the dukes and the title's heir, and has added information about children and wives, which belongs to the respective article, so I have removed the table and reverted the article to the last version before its insertion.  ~~ Phoe  talk  ~~ 13:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:Drill (military)

message: I would be against such a merger, as what we see today at a military parade e.g. at the trooping of the colours, is only a small part of what once existed, elements of military drill such as the loading and firing by platoon and company, the fixing of bayonets etc is missing from the modern parade. This article should be allowed to continue to exist and be expanded. If no such expansion can be achieved then the merger should be from Parade(military) to this article, to prevent putting the cart before the horse.Koonan the almost civilised 06:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with Parade(military)
Talk:Military mark time

message: Can anyone with experience of military drill explain what the point of marching on the spot is, and when it is used (ideally in the article rather than here, and with reference to sources)? Why not just stand still? Beorhtwulf (talk) 20:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's used sometimes by color guards, so they can change direction in tight spaces. See this as an example. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the point?
Talk:Pleroma

message: I do not believe that Pagels would assert that Paul was a Gnostic and if she would it would be with a great deal of nuance.  Without reference, this assertion should be removed.  The Gnostics used a wide variety of NT canon to support their theology and Paul was not unique in this regard.  If anything, Pagels thesis The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis would highlight the Gospel of John as a centerpiece of Gnostic theology as much as any Pauline work.
Perhaps simply removing "Proponents of the view that Paul was actually a gnostic, such as" would be sufficient.
I'll work on identifying some quotes in the short term. --Olen Watson 16:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your opinion that Pagels does not think that Paul was gnostic is not supported by the evidence, considering she wrote a book titled The Gnostic Paul. --Blainster 23:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Currently, the word “fullness” redirects here.  I would imagine that somebody typing “fullness” as their search term might know nothing about religion at all.  Maybe they meant to look up “satiety” instead?  I nominated “fullness” for RfD, and the consensus was to keep.  But one of the commenters mentioned that if I wanted to change it into a disambiguation page then an RfD was unnecessary and that I could “float the idea on the two Talk pages”; therefore, if anybody has any further comments, please continue the discussion here.
Bwrs (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect for discussion? 

message: The problem is, it highly inflates the significance of a word into a "universal Christian / Gnostic concept" - which largely is really not true. Most of the time the word is used in a mundane sense, and in the 4 or 5 instances where it implies "all the qualities of God," or "all the qualities of Christ" - the word still has no special or secret meaning. The article is ICONIZING a simple word - perhaps it is sexy and "cosmological" sounding - but it means what it means and that is all. It is incidental to the usage - and that is rarely significant in any theological or theoretical sense.
Thus in order to fix this article - there would be nothing left of it. It is a failed draft at an article - that is all.
--Xgenei (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this subject is without sufficient gravity to be a separate entry. 

message: There is no reference on Pagels being a heretical proponent. It seems like Pagels is seen as a heretic by the person who wrote this -- which is not an objective fact. Heresy is relative to every religion. Araph (talk) 10:42, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagels -- a heretical proponent?
Talk:At attention

message: >What is the purpose of standing to attension?
209.183.34.48 (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: The Painting with Napoleon incorrectly states that those in the picture are at the stance of attention, they are in fact at the position of the Salute, I recommend that this picture is withdrawn from the article as it is not correct. 109.224.139.191 (talk) 19:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Napoleon Painting

message: German Bundeswehr drill dictates ... outstretched hands ...
That's a myth, or else it is new. Correct: Hands clenched. 
Commented that out until resolved. --217.229.42.35 (talk) 00:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Bundeswehr 

message: We seriously need a better source than this as it's pretty much the only source. Rklawton (talk) 23:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Center for Disease Control

message: Зенитная Самоходная Установка (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do you sit at attention?
Talk:London Government Act 1899

message: Can the section on the status of women and elections be clarified - it might be taken to indicate that women weren;t eligible when they were. Jackiespeel 16:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I understand it the legislation and Bill they weren't eligible to be councillors until the enactment of the Qualification of Women (County and Borough Councils) Act 1907, and couldn't vote until the Representation of the People Act 1918. Lozleader 23:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Women

message: Where can I find a copy of the 1899 Act?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.158.65.178  (talk • contribs).
:A good reference library should have a copy, bound up in a volume for the year 1899.Lozleader 13:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy of the Act

message: The Borough of Stoke Newington is missing from the table in the section Areas of the Metropolitan Boroughs, although it is included in the map. The Stoke Newington article indicates that the borough was the successor to two local authorities: the vestry of Stoke Newington parish in the County of London and the South Hornsey Urban District Council in Middlesex. I would make the changes, but am not sure about to describe the area in a way consistent with the rest of the table.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.19.151 (talk) 15:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stoke Newington 

message: What exactly was this - is it referring to the London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939 ? Jackiespeel (talk) 19:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: London Government Act 1939
Talk:Velanidia, Laconia

message: Babelfish at http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr provides the following machine translation for the Greek text in this article.
:The village Acorns is Municipal Apartment of Municipality Vojw'n Lakonia and it finds the Prefecture, between the Tow Male'a and the Tow Camel. Can read more making kljk here: [(http://www.myrtidiotissa.gr) ]
:It is a graphic village with unique natural beauties and rich cultural reserve so much from ancient monuments, previous 1830 as the Saint My'rwn, what newer monuments as the lighthouse Male'a --Eastmain 16:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation from Babelfish
Talk:Goal of the Year (AFL)

message: This award does not exist prior to 2001.
See AFL Record Season Guides e.g. 2008 page 509:
"Since 2001, the AFL has made weekly nominations for the official version of the Goal of the Year and the winner has been announced at the end of the season."
RossRSmith (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because like the Mark of the Year it hasn't always been an AFL award.  The AFL took it over a few years ago.  During the 1970s and early 1980s, the award was decided by a panel of football experts on Network Seven's "World of Sport" program and during the 1980s and 1990s, the winning mark was determined by selected football journalists and experts.  --Rulesfan (talk) 04:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I guess that ends the issue promoted in the tag as there has been no reply, so I'll remove it. Footy Freak7 (talk) 23:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

text: But has the Goal of the Year actually existed before 2001? I don't see any evidence of this. Thefourdotelipsis (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Dispute 
Talk:Nuclear power in the United Kingdom

message: The table has been edited so that the total no longer includes abandoned proposals. S C Cheese (talk) 10:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed  

message: Dungeness is still working Nuklear Power Station. 2A00:23EE:10B0:69F2:2991:BDFA:461B:26B7 (talk) 20:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dungeness B has been in an outage since 2018 and has now moved into defuelling AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 10:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dungeness
Talk:Mary Walton

message: I think the article mixes 2 different Mary Waltons. The life dates are according to this article 1727-1794 but also according to this article Mary Walton created in 1879 a method for reducing the environmental hazards of the smoke, 85 years after she died. Sp please clean it up. --85.124.99.8 16:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mary Walton Morris is not notable I think. I was going to make her an aritcle and make Mary Walton a disambig page, but when I started looking more carefully, I realized that she really wasn't that notable. --Lendorien 23:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Mary Waltons 

message: We (Another Wikipedia nerd and I) recently discovered Mary Walton looking for female inventors, We noticed that there's almost no information about her, there's no birth date in the article (some others wikipedias claim that she was born on 1827) and we never found a death date either. It seems that her name was Mary E. Walton according to the U.S patent from 1881, We don't know what the "E" stands for tho. We found a site where a "Mary Elizabeth Walton" appears... even they have the same alleged birth dates! (1827), the site is this one: "https://es.findagrave.com/memorial/110102351/mary-elizabeth-walton". There's a grave where shows that she died in 1913, but we don't know if these 2 Mary Waltons are the same, In the description of the website they never talk about the accomplishments or inventions she made, all this seems very weird, I think it's important to make sure that the info we have it's correct and if we can add more to it, this article seems very incomplete. Wikipexi2552 (talk) 06:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Mary Walton?
Talk:Blacksburg, South Carolina

message: That wouldn't happen to be the Charleston, Cincinnati and Chicago Railroad, would it? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  C.C. & C. Railroad Company? 
Talk:United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

message: In the Current Composition of the Court, one column lists 'Duty Station' - to what does this refer? It is typically a military term indicative of where service members are billeted/serving, but the members of the court are civilians and the court sits only en banc, so it is not indicative of where a single justice exercises some capacity such as that of Supreme Court justices assigned responsibiity for specific Circuit Courts. Irish Melkite (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duty Station
Talk:Euphoria (Part 1)

message: Does anyone else think the two Euphoria sections should be merged into one article since they tell a continuous story and (unlike the 2-part season 4 finale "House's Head/Wilson's Heart) have virtually the same name except for one digit.  Your thoughts...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.10.33 (talk) 06:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is better they remain separate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.113.226 (talk) 11:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Merge with part 2?
Talk:United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals

message: Hello, I have a question. My grandson was in Fort Hood Texas in the Army when he was picked up for a warrant that is from Independence Mo. Right now he is being charged with a few charges and waiting to be brought back to Missouri. will the Military help him with an attorney? Shellytaute0711 (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal Law
Talk:Articles of War (Royal Navy)

message: It's unclear to me from the article whether the Articles are currently in force (whether notionally or not). zazpot (talk) 05:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says very clearly: "The Naval Discipline Act 1957 is scheduled to be repealed in 2009, when they will be replaced by the provisions of the tri-service Armed Forces Act 2006."--DThomsen8 (talk) 22:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear
Talk:Dorset Fire and Rescue Service

message: * If you have any comments about this article please leave a comment either here or on my talk page. Tellyaddict 17:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:27th Golden Raspberry Awards

message: Even though the official site hyphenates lop-sided, we should present it here as lopsided. I noticed someone made the correction to match the "official" spelling, however there are a few minor corrections to the nominations list in the article that do not match the official site (namely, to match capitalization and to correct movie titles). —Twigboy 17:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lop-sided vs. lopsided 

message: AFAIK, the reference to "Nicolas Cage and his bear suit" is the fact that Cage has a hairy chest. (Was there an actual bear suit in the film? I don't know.) To clarify the pun, I wikilinked to chest hair, however 161.184.176.136 and 161.184.176.234 did not agree, but did not provide an edit summary justifying their position. I don't want to get into a revert war over such a silly thing. I just think that we should be clear, so as the reader does not take any allusion to be literal (and, thus, unencyclopedic). Thoughts?—Twigboy 22:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicolas Cage's bear suit
Talk:Howard McNear

message: The place of death was the San Fernando Valley Veterans Hospital in Sylmar.  The hospital was incapacitatedhttp://www3.gendisasters.com/california/8191/los-angeles-vicinity-ca-earthquake-feb-1971 as a result of the 1971 earthquake and now a park occupies the area http://www.bssaonline.org/content/65/4/937.abstract.  The place of death is not San Fernando, but Sylmar.  San Fernando Valley is too vague.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylmarnut (talk • contribs) 21:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge #36346: Place of death 

message: I don't recall enough to be able to include this in the article, but on Andy Griffith show (after McNear's post-stroke return) there is a case where: Floyd is shown in one place and soon in another place. For continuity there, Floyd would have to take some steps which the actor (McNear) probably does not because of his condition. Carlm0404 (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floyd appears to take a few steps
Talk:Fractional ownership

message: Performed a general cleanup, edited prolixities and removed the spam notice.  Didn't see much spam, more like removing a few NPOV nits or company-specific advertisements.--Robertkeller 17:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry, but there is a certain amount of semantic jiggery-pokery to obscure the fact that an actual resident shares actual residency enjoyment of the property time-slice-wise with other owners of the property. Don't add text to implicitly deny that structural aspect of the living: it may not be 'timeshare', but it is time-sharing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohndanR (talk • contribs) 03:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Fractional Ownership operationally equivalent to Timeshare

message: What specifically in this section is unsourced? I can't link to the companies performing these fractioanlization actions since apparently that is advertising...  
Investment in iconic pieces of sports memorabilia, including sports cards, game-used items, trophies, autographs, and other historically significant documents is now possible through fractionalization. Prior to fractional ownership, investment in this industry was limited to those with ample capital and industry expertise. As these assets appreciate (or depreciate) over time, peer-to-peer trading allows the share price to increase/decrease to reflect market conditions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.55.87 (talk) 20:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:RS and WP:PRIMARY.  If a reliable secondary source hasn't written about it, it doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. If the only sources you have are primary, i.e. the actual companies doing it, then it doesn't belong in the encyclopedia.  I invite you to ask the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE for a second opinion. I also urge you to learn how to sign talk page posts, with four tildes, which will automatically insert your IP address.  - Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sports memorabilia
Talk:Semyon Kotko

message: Hrm. Isn't "The Story of a Real Man" also something of an opera on a Soviet subject (I may be mistaken there!)
(While I like best The Fiery Angel of the operatic music of his that I know, his operatic music in general is mostly undiscovered territory for me- since I have some listening to do at the library in the near future, this is a strong -hint-. So I may be able, if the Gergiev series got that far or if a good libretto's around, to answer that question myself.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ami Popper

message: I tried to create a header/intro for this article. Thanks--Tom 17:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Header of article

message: I am living in Israel and to my knowledge, there is no talk about releasing Popper in 2023.
This informatiom which you quote with no refrence is apparently wrong:
If he gets time off (by law, a third of the sentence) for good behavior, he can be released around 2016, but that will be decided only then, not in advance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.143.123.10 (talk) 10:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did you hear about his possible release in 2023? 

message: There are plenty of sources calling him a terrorist and it certainly was racially targeted but I'm hesitant to add controversial tags without conversation. Thoughts? Sol (talk) 01:51, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish Terrorism cat? 

message: Confused about the language of mass murderer -- seems more applicable to Pol Pot. And analogous attacks in the same place or time are considered terrorism. Why mass murder and not terror, or vice versa?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.27.31.160 (talk) 23:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrorist or mass murderer
Talk:King's Colour Squadron

message: Standard equally as high as the guards division? That seems unlikely, please provide a reliable citation for this before reverting, and I don't mean the RAF website, thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.39.125 (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equal standard to Guards? 

message: , you added a Clarify tag to the article. It is common practice to either post on the talk page, or write within the curly brackets what the exact problem is that you want addressing. At the moment, to me, it makes sense, so I cannot see what you are getting at. Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) The joy of all things (talk) 21:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The word "those" is too ambiguous, and not grammatically/syntactically correct. I don't know what phrase needs to replace it so I left a clarify tag. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  well how about ? The joy of all things (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That works, but still a bit vague. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 05:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify
Talk:Options for Change

message: From what I am seeing, this is a defence review [paper] and its implimentation?  It is certainly the title of the review. It probably should be represented as such? I would have thought that the rewiew paper (in some final form) would be written down and would therefore be a source to be used. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the Options for Change
Talk:Patrick Gordon Walker

message: needs references, and a picture - submit to WP:Biography for Peer Review for more detailed suggestions. Mocko13 02:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
I think this article has potential, but references (using footnotes especially) are needed. Also, it's needs proofreading.--Macca7174 19:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From Harold Wilson's Wikiquote page; Smethwick Conservatives can have the satisfaction of having topped the poll, of having sent a Member who, until another election returns him to oblivion, will serve his time here as a Parliamentary leper.
Hansard, House of Commons, 5th series, vol. 701, col. 71.
Speech in the House of Commons, 3 November, 1964. The 1964 general election had seen the defeat of Wilson's Shadow Foreign Secretary Patrick Gordon Walker by Conservative Peter Griffiths after an allegedly racist campaign.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.7.132 (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Black