lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hueneme High School

message: This is ridiculous. Stop ruining this articile with your antics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.190.163 (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Immature Editing

message: This edit warring is getting ridiculous now. If anonymous accounts continue to add this without providing sources I will protect The Wrong Version of this article. —  iridescent (talk to me!) 18:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joseph De Soto

message: As multiple anonymous IPs and single-purpose accounts are repeatedly introducing the same unsourced statement to this article, I have removed the statement in question & semiprotected this for three days. That should hopefully give you time to find the reliable sources you have repeatedly been asked to provide before continuing your editwarring. —  iridescent (talk to me!) 22:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Semiprotected

message: I find it annoying that your article on Hueneme High School only speaks of the school's athletic notables.
I graduated in 1966, and in that year alone the graduating class had 2 National Merit Scholars, multiple California State Scholars, and a student admitted to the United States Naval Academy.
A teacher, Stan Daily, was the first Mayor of the City of Camarillo, a city he helped found in 1964 or '65.
Madeline Miedema, a vice-principle, was a noted local historian.
Through the Sixties and the early Seventies, Hueneme High School was an academic powerhouse.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:e07:bbf8:5096:dd83:79b5:e6a0 (talk • contribs) 00:03, April 7, 2021 (UTC)
:In almost all cases, the notable alumni sections of school articles only include people with Wikipedia articles to show their notability. Like it or not, it's generally easier to find significant media coverage to show notability of professional athletes than any other profession, so many alumni lists are similarly skewed. If there are other notable alumni you are aware of then feel free to write articles about them and then add them to this article. Note that simply being a good student, being admitted to a particular school, being a locally-known historian (or anything else), or being the mayor of a small place is not sufficient to show notability.  Anything you do add will have to be written in neutral language and reliably sourced., so claims such as "Hueneme High School was an academic powerhouse" are not going to make the cut. Meters (talk) 00:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics content
Talk:Natural wine

message: I have no expertise in this area, but this sounds an awful like what for fruit and vegetables is called "organic". Is that another name for "natural wine"? If there is a difference, it would be good to have it explained in the article.Bill (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Organic?
Talk:Knez Mihailova Street

message: The proper Serbian spelling would be: Ulica knez Mihailova (small k) or Knez Mihailova ulica (small u). --89.216.37.81 18:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is true, current name of the article is grammatically incorrect. Dzigor 19:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Serbian spelling

message: Personally, I don't like "Knez Mihailova Street", but The Beograd.rs official site uses it. I would like it to be simply "Knez Mihailova" (Кнез Михаилова), as Primary topic. French and Italian articles use native names (parks, streets etc).  For instance, the street is predominantly written as "Кнез Михаилова 1" and scarcely as "Кнез Михаилова улица 1"/"Кнез Михаилова ул. 1". Here are the Gbooks hits for different spellings/variations:
*"Knez Mihajlova" (205 hits)
*"Knez Mihailova" (198)
*"Knez Mihailova Street" (42)
*"Knez Mihajlova Street" (49)
*"Prince Mihailo's Street" (4)
*"Knez Mihailo's Street" (3)
*"Prince Mihajlo's Street" (2)
*"Prince Mihailo Street" (16)
*"Prince Mihajlo Street" (4)
*"Knez Mihailo Street" (6)
*"Knez Mihajlo Street" (2)
In Serbian latin  (ulica/ul.):
*"Knez Mihailova ulica" (32)
*"Knez Mihajlova ulica" (21)
*"Ulica Kneza Mihajla" (11)
*"Ulica Kneza Mihaila" (9)
*"Ul. Kneza Mihajla" (6)
*"Ul. Kneza Mihaila" (5)
Listing these in case of future discussions.--Zoupan 21:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:List of disabilities

message: List of disabilities was deleted for being a list of poorly related medical conditions with no encyclopedic value. Such a page would be a lot of work, but it could only be a copy of the information on the linked page, DSM-IV Codes. DSM-IV is the authority for a "list of disabilities" and the quality information that any person coming to this page would have been looking for. Also, for the WP:MED page, a "list of disabilities" is very appropriate, and for the novice replacing that item with "DSM-IV Codes" would not be clear, or consistent with the design of the existing table of contents.
ThtrGremlin 19:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I-52-class submarine

message: Quote form the article: "...were known as the most advanced submarines of the period.[citation needed]"...this type statement showed up under the main Japanese submarine article as well as the article for I-52. Does anybody know what made these subs so 'advanced'? Surely it's not just their fuel capacity and range (which are functions of size, not advanced technology)...Engr105th (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "advanced" ??
Talk:The Young Ones (song)

message: for sureBold 41.13.17.4 (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Young but strong
Template talk:MWband

message: There seems to be some confusion in the various article pages defining the nomenclature of the different radio bands.   The IEEE designators are explicitly for radar (see: IEEE Standard 521-2002) and the designations in this standard are HF, VHF, UHF, L, S, C, X, Ku, K, Ka, V and W.  I'm in the process of tidying up the various radio band pages, so I have started with this template, in order that it correctly defines the IEEE (radar) bands. MarkPos 19:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The links to NATO Radio bands, IEEE Radar bands are broken. The article is still there, but the chapters where these links refer to have been removed. Panic1 (talk) 08:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken links
Talk:Stock music

message: The original version, which (like this version) was merely a redirect to Production music, was deleted in January. However the term is widely used (1,770,000 Google hits) and even appears in this advertising dictionary: "Existing music that can be purchased for an agreed-upon usage." Plasticup T/C 19:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-creating this page
Talk:List of lighthouses in New Zealand

message: Any one know why Somes Island lighthouse in Wellington is missing from the list? Herewego95 (talk) 10:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somes Island lighthouse
Talk:Ukrainians in Russia

message: This article mixes ethnic Ukrainians and Russian refugees from Ukraine. Indeed, since 2014, six to seven million ethnic Russians flew from Ukraine to Russia but to call them "Ukrainians" is like calling German Jews who escaped the Nazis "Germans". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:a45e:72a7:1:d4b5:9a37:cd0e:b878 (talk) 04:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong article

message: Kuban Kazak is Russian biased and Beetstra does not read any Russian or Ukrainian or Cyrillic. They deleted my links.
Maybe someone can use these for references in the article or as External Links (I am for it, but please agree as well - as there are some objections from a Dutchman who issued a warning to me, and one Russian)
* Andrij Mendeluk. Ukrainian Ethnographic Border and Peculiarities of Its Forming (by Prof. V. О. Gerynovych) (Ukrainian) - this is a Ukrainian journals source
* Dialect map of Ukrainian language (Ukrainian/English) - this page is a page of Ukrainians in Poland. It's not personal page!
* Ukrainian ethnograhpic map 1949 by V.Kubijovyc-M.Kulyckyj (Ukrainian/English) - this is purely ethnographic page
* Ethnic Territory of the Ukrainian people in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries (English) - the same
* Linguistic Divisions of Europe in 1914 (German) - even though it is personal page, but it is personal page of a Professor Emeritus, who teached 40 years at Boston College and now teaches Honors course! As his surname hints, he is German and thus not pro-Ukrainian or pro-Russian I guess (this map shows German colonies).
* Etnographical map of Slavs / Národopisná mapa Slovanstva, end of 19th beginning of 20th century (Czech) Slovanstvo. Praha 1912. (Příloha.) - I changed to another source - page of a Bulgarian historian who is unlikely pro-Ukrainian !
* Ethnolinguistic setting of the Ukrainian lands. Historical Atlas of Ukraine - I change to this source: it is a Sumy City page — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKonstantin (talk • contribs) 11:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: The "Notable Ukrainians in Russia" section is insanely gigantic at a whopping 80,168 bytes and takes up something like 60% of the article in terms of screensizes on my desktop. It should be split off into its own article called List of Ukrainians in Russia, akin to articles like List of Asian Americans. HappyWith (talk) 17:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all it should be throughly checked out, because it seems like a huge OR, misslabelling Russian's born on territory of today's Ukraine, active later in Russia, as "Ukrainians in Russia". Marcelus (talk) 10:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Talk:The Engineering of Consent

message: Under 'Evolution', it mentions subliminal advertising as being modern examples but doesn't explain how or why. Dankind 19:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How or why evolution

message: Where the devil can I find this essay?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.59.115 (talk) 04:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 250, Communication and Social Action (Mar., 1947), pp. 113-120  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.59.115 (talk) 05:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Pixelmator Classic

message: I tweaked the article a little bit, added some references and removed the templates. IMHO: i didn't think it was that 'commercially written' at all. I've seen much worse :)  Husky (talk page) 19:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tweaked the article a little bit

message: I removed the Future Changes section because it was outdated. I also added version 2.0 to the version history table.
ConnorGriffin (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated the article

message: :Pixelmator has received criticism for not supporting graphics tablets pressure sensitivity[3]. It has also been criticized of being "sizzle over steak", in other words being over-hyped for an under-functional application [citation needed]
Well, I don't know if that's true but I do know that it supports it now, also, this program is blazingly fast! Wolfos1232 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 08:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's ok. I tried to find references for those two statements, but the only thing i found was the blog reference, which i agree isn't quite substantial enough.  Husky (talk page) 16:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
File talk:Bulls Ishikawa, Okinawa 2007.jpg

message: Considering the photographer,  would probably be a better image copyright tag for this very nice picture. --199.71.174.100 19:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that the image is no longer protected (off the main page), I've made the change,  -> . --199.71.174.100 05:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Old Cathedral of Saint John of Matha and Saint Felix of Valois

message: I arrived at this article searching for Dreifaltigkeitskirche, Bratislava. I understand that this is not it because Strattner can't have been educated here if it was demolished in the 16th century and not rebuilt until 1727. Is there a different church in the town, dedicated to the Holy Trinity? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trinity?
Talk:Season finale

message: If your going to list notable season finales someone need to put Dallas on there. They had the original cliffhanger.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.200.62 (talk) 06:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

message: "In American English, the term has evolved to describe the final event of a sporting season, e.g. in soccer or motocross, perhaps partly because of the popularity of these with television viewers."  What is "these"?  The sport or the term?  If it the sport, soccer is hardly popular enough in America (yet) to warrant such a reference.  Speaking of references... where's the reference for this?  --  NewkirkPlaza (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series finale
Talk:P.Y.T. (band)

message: Ashley Niven and Ashley McNelis are both mentioned in the article, but it is not stated if both are the same person or there was a replacement. Somebody knowing about this band needs to update this article and include more references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robgomez (talk • contribs) 18:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ashley Niven and Ashley McNelis

message: 1. We're Dancing
2. Anywhere USA
3. DFW
4. Walk Before We Run
5. Book Of Dreams
6. Sooner Or Later
7. Prove Yourself
8. Something More Beautiful
9. Simply In Love With You  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.42.161.45 (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Sides
Talk:Regional Express Holdings

message: Would the logo for The Rex Group from https://rex.com.au/Corporate/ come under fair use on Regional Express Holdings?  Or would this count as "The logo of an entity used for identification of one of its child entities, when the child entity lacks its own branding." from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Images_2 Edward Tremethick (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo
Talk:Temora Aviation Museum

message: Please re-do to include the full sign to the left...the name of the museum !  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resolution Man (talk • contribs) 01:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEADING PHOTO 

message: Dear wikipedians, I wonder whether the "Warbirds Downunder" airshow shouldn't have it's own article. It should have the same rationale as for Warbirds over Wanaka airshow. Happy to hear your thoughts. Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own article for the airshow?
Talk:ABC countries

message: I think that both the "ABC Powers" article and the "ABC Countries" article are 2 short. I believe that it would save time for anyone wanting to know about this topic if the pages were combined. 168.156.168.253
:Agree, ABC Powers should be merged into ABC Countries. Dentren | Talk 07:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have carried out the merge. Terraxos 03:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:1077th Anti-Aircraft Regiment (Soviet Union)

message: In the face of the mythology spread by the Soviets around events like the Battle of Prokhorovka, I find it hard to take this story at face value, especiall given the mentioned sources.
--Cancun771 (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet propaganda?

message: This article needs more research. Where did the battle take place? Did the 1077th really exist (there are no definitive proofs as far as I can tell that this is the name of this unit)? As far as I can tell we should see this battle in a more broader view. The 16. PzDiv succeeded in making a corridor to the Volga, becoming isolated in the process. This happened on the 23th of August, and they were relieved by the LI. AK on 30 August. (http://www.stalingradbattle.nl/deslag/aankomst.htm) Presumably it was in the making of this corridor that the battle against the AA-batteries took place. A soviet map (http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaww2/maps/1942SW/Stalingrad/battle_volgadmin_ru/10.HTM) shows the breakthrough (but I don't know just how reliable it is). I do not speak russian, so I don't know what the translations are, but another map (http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaww2/maps/1942SW/Stalingrad/ostrov42.gif) says 'unman' means AT-artillery regiment. Supposing 'an' means something like 'regiment' or 'artillery regiment', we could say that all the abbreviations on the first map ending on 'an' means something like that. On the map, we can find 409, 436, 1046 an, and 1/1103, 2/1103, 1/1105, 2/1105, 1158 nan. Are these AA-artillery regiments? We also notice that nowhere on the map the number 1077 is visible. Either  the 1077 didn't exist, or 'an' and 'nan' are medium or heavy artillery  regiments, and AA isn't depicted on the map. Anyway, our research continues
--BlackEagle17 (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More research
Talk:Karl Friedrich von dem Knesebeck

message: I will continue work on this article when time permits. FWTTVK 19:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fractional renting

message: This article seems spammy to me. A cursory google shows that this may be more than a mere neologism, but I'm wary of the link. Is the author in any way connected to the business or business category that is the topic of this article? Please see WP:COI. In the meantime, I'm removing the link and monitoring this article closely for improvement. - superβεεcat  19:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Girls@Play

message: I've a recollection of hearing that they deliberately chose male-dominated occupations.  Is this true and, if so, can anybody find a source?
Something else that would be interesting to find out: In deciding the name of the group, was any pun on Men at Work intended? -- Smjg (talk) 00:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Warli

message: i don like this painting okk bczz i have to make project on it so its bad realy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.72.220.221 (talk) 10:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia talk pages are not a place to discuss your personal opinions about the articles subjects.  Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:36, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

message: Banchod 2409:4063:4C9D:B988:0:0:13CB:E609 (talk) 05:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maharchod
Talk:YMS-1-class minesweeper

message: explanation follows in a timely manner 158.181.81.240 (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well, I'll wait for your explanation. - wolf 19:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: well, presumably you know that something entered on this page is false, so why don't you start with the source that disputes that information. 158.181.81.240 (talk) 20:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't claim anything was false. I did however remove content that you had supported with the shipbuildinghistory.com ref. Aren't you going to now show how that site meets the requirements of a reliable source? Wasn't that the purpose of your multiple reverts? - wolf 21:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: i am editing ww2 era articles. the guy publishes his email and accepts corrections. the site is used all over wikipedia. i think you are trying to recruit me as a pet to do useless tasks for you and i will revert it and let arbitration decide. 158.181.81.240 (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

text: i will try. my problem is that people on wikipedia are very unhelpful and the first line of defense is made of folks who seem to not understand much about the subject matter they are patrolling or have access to useful resources related to the subject matter. it's frustrating. you haven't made a single useful contribution to the problem and we have talked for days now. 158.181.82.96 (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I realize that Wikipedia can be daunting, we were all new to this project at one point, and just like you, needed to understand that there are many policies & guidelines that govern this project, along with an expectation of collegial cooperation. Now, short of me actually finding sources to support your content, then researching and writing your edits for you... I have been helping you. I've made efforts to welcome you on the many user talk pages you are accumulating with your growing list of IP accounts (, , ), I tried to encourage you to create a registered account with a detailed personal message. I've tried to notify you of as many policies and guidelines as possible, to help you with your edits. These are the rules you need to read, learn and follow, if you want to edit this project. And even when your responses have been less than collegeal, and even insulting, I have kept my reponses above board. (A flame war would get us no where.) In short, there are problems with your edits, I have tried to let you know what those problems are, and the rules that apply... it's on you to take the steps to learn them and improve. Edit-warring, snippy responses and trying to avoid the problem is not the way to go here. (imho) - wolf 13:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  shipbuildinghistory is inadequate
Talk:G418

message: 'REDIRECT Hygromycin B'
Its proper name is Geneticin
G418 is:
C20H40N4O10
IUPAC Name: (2R,3S,4R,5R,6S)-5-amino-6-[(1R,2S,3S,4R,6S)-4,6-diamino-3-[(2R,3R,4R,5R)-3
,5-dihydroxy-5-methyl-4-methylaminooxan-2-yl]oxy-2-hydroxycyclohexyl]oxy-2-
(1-hydroxyethyl)oxane-3,4-diol
Canonical SMILES: CC(C1C(C(C(C(O1)OC2C(CC(C(C2O)OC3C(C(C(CO3)(C)O)NC)O)N)N)N)O)O)O
Hygromyin B is:
C20H37N3O13
IUPAC Name: (3'R,3aS,4S,4'R,5'R,6R,6'R,7S,7aS)-4-[(1R,2S,3R,5S,6R)-3-amino-2,6-dihydrox
y-5-methylaminocyclohexyl]oxy-6'-[(1S)-1-amino-2-hydroxyethyl]-6-(hydroxyme
thyl)spiro[4,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-3aH-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-d]pyran-2,2'-oxane]-3',
4',5',7-tetrol
Canonical SMILES: CNC1CC(C(C(C1O)OC2C3C(C(C(O2)CO)O)OC4(O3)C(C(C(C(O4)C(CO)N)O)O)O)O)N
user:mxpule
:thank you for posting this--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  got rid of this redirect below --- Dudes, G418 is *not* Hygromcin

message: The structural image provided is incorrect. The 4,6-disubstituted-2-deoxystreptamine scaffold is correct, but the substituted groups are flipped. The sugar with the secondary amine should be at the top. See the image provided by PubChem here (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Geneticin#section=2D-Structure). I would upload an updated image, but I do not have a working license of ChemDraw. I did not bother to check if the rest of the stereochemistry was correct but a correction should be made to the structural image by someone with a working ChemDraw license. YuYuTheYunicorn (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: will look--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect structural image