lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:P′′

message: Are you saying the correct pronunciation is "pee prIm PrIm"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.53.172.147 (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I'm saying that the written name of this language given by the author (in the published article where it was defined), is a kind of curly letter "P" followed by two "prime" characters.  The article doesn't say how to pronounce it.  Here's a fragment of the published article, so readers can see for themselves. --r.e.s. 23:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the language 

message: I moved this page from P prime prime to P′′.  The article had a  note, claiming the right title was \mathcal{P}^{\prime\prime}.  In my opinion, that's wrong.  Page titles here on Wikipedia are always in the default roman font.  For example, novel titles are written in italics, but the name of the article about a novel is still upright.  Basically, what I'm arguing is that we wouldn't use \mathcal in the title even if we could. dbenbenn | talk 18:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, given that you've also added an important redirect to this article from P (using "single quotes" instead of "primes").  Since the "prime" characters in the title are easily misread as "single quote" characters, and also cannot be directly typed on standard keyboards, a reader searching for this article is likely to type P instead of P′′ (see what I mean?). --r.e.s. (Talk) 23:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: As it stands, the article Bowdlerises the name of the Brainfuck language to brain**** . Which isn't appropriate, if you ask me, considering the detailed discussion of this language's name above ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by A Karley (talk • contribs) 03:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia:Schools' FAQ#Is it a safe environment for young people? states that "Wikipedia is not bowdlerized or censored." Accordingly, I've restored the original references to brainfuck in the article. --r.e.s. (talk) 03:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the subject of proper language names ... 

message: Is there any one correct way to pronounce the name? --201.83.149.39 (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'd like to know too. If there isn't a correct or agreed upon way to pronounce it, that should be noted in the article. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 16:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

text: I would guess the proper name is "Rho double prime", correctly written as Ρʺ or U+03A1 U+02BA, but the ambiguity is likely to be a mathematician's joke. 2001:470:1F09:10D6:3493:51E6:3757:8DCC (talk) 08:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the pronounciation? 

message: Is it appropriate to say that P′′ influenced brainfuck, given that it is unknown whether Urban Muller was aware of Corrado Bohm's paper/language? 140.32.111.75 (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influenced
Talk:Habanera (music)

message: The following block of information was added by an anonymous user. Can anyone verify it? -AKeen 06:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Block of Info

message: Trying to describe either music or dance in words alone has limited payoff for readers who do not already know what is being described. Longer term, we should move towards links to visual and aural files which might be appreciated by readers who have little training in these arts. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Just noting, though, that it's been pretty difficult finding good stuff for the article, and it is, of course, a work in progress. Steve Pastor (talk) 15:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dance & music in prose 

message: I propose that Contradanza be merged into Habanera (music). I think these pages refer to the same thing with a different name. Since Habanera is the internationally most known name, I think this one should be the destination page. Note that Habanera  does link to French Contradanza as an earlier form from which it derives, but probably that should have been French Contra dance. LazyStarryNights (talk) 19:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Patscherkofel

message: The present image is a bit misleading, since it was taken on the Patscherkofel. Maybe someone wants to integrate the following facts (in decent English) into the article: the village in front is Schönberg with the toll station of the autobahn from Innsbruck to the Brenner Pass. The mountain on the left hand side is the Serles, the valley in front the Wipptal and that leading away from the viewer is the Stubaital. --Markus (Mh26) 18:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:List of psychiatric medications

message: Should  Coaxil, Tatinol (Tianeptine) be added to the list?  Zenhabit (talk) 09:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think :Category:Psychiatry is subsumed by :Category:Mental health, so I guess that's fine. David Kernow 20:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are, in fact, a number of articles (including psychiatry) that appear in both. I would be interested in any further comments on how we can categorise these clearly. Perhaps create a new category of psychiatic treatments? --Vincej 10:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Unless I am misunderstanding how categories are structured, if an article has the category Psychiatry, it doesn't need the category Mental health as well. Best wishes, David Kernow 12:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  coaxil? 

message: Should Lamictal (lamotrigine) be added to the list? Jorrit787 00:00, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely it should. It covers treatment of a wide range of disorders in the psychiatric field. I support the addition. Fliry Vorru 20:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, added. Jorrit787 17:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamictal? 

message: Is this really used as a psychiatric med?
60.241.103.178 (talk) 03:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Calcium carbonate
Talk:Soyuz TMA-8

message: In Brazil it is being reported the deal was actually 10mi USD, I'll check more sources. nihil 20:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazilian Deal

message: Bigtop 05:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: *I think that the new way to present the crew adds useless complication. Hektor 14:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New crew list
Category talk:Faster-than-light travel

message: The first sentence needs a rewrite.  While it is not possible to move through ones local Lorentz frame faster than the speed of light, it is possible to use various tricks involving "coordinate acceleration" to span vast distances and beat a light ray not traveling with you.  Such schemes are fully consistant with General Relativity, and the impediments to realizing them are tecnological, not conceptual.  "Considered by science not to be possible" needs to be replaced by a somewhat less restrictive phrase.  Particularly in light of the fact that some of the schemes described in the articles indexed in this category are based on papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which presumedly have been thoroughly checked for incorrectness. Hermitian 19:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote the initial description.  That was before such papers had been added to this category.  I'll rewrite the category description.  Let me know what you think.  Val42 04:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's excellent.  Thanks. Hermitian 06:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hermitan claimed that the impediments to realizing [FTL travel in gtr] are tecnological, not conceptual.  That is certainly not a widely accepted viewpoint in the research literature!  See these papers. ---CH 23:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The main article for this category Faster than light treats FTL travel as an afterthought. That doesn't seem to be the best choice for a category's main article. I'd suggest at least organizing the main article better. Kortoso (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Description of category
Category talk:User qya-3

message: * (cur) (last)  09:07, 23 April 2006 Jon Harald Søby (Talk | contribs) m
    * (cur) (last) 09:07, 23 April 2006 Jon Harald Søby (Talk | contribs) m
    * (cur) (last) 12:22, 12 January 2006 Turukano (Talk | contribs)
    * (cur) (last) 12:08, 12 January 2006 Turukano (Talk | contribs)
    * (cur) (last) 14:39, 9 January 2006 Angr (Talk | contribs) (create category)
Jon Harald Søby 20:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original history (before move)
Talk:University of Buckingham

message: •	Information to be added or removed: In 2018, the University of Buckingham opened the Vinson Building located on Hunter Street. Launched in collaboration with the Institute of Economic Affairs, it houses the Vinson Centre for Economics and Entrepreneurship and explores a range of ideas, arguments, and issues associated with the idea of a “constitution of liberty”.
•	Explanation of issue: Update about new building and research centre. 
•	Reference supporting change:  http://www.cityam.com/269807/we-taking-first-step-challenge-university-groupthink  https://bbf.uk.com/news/launch-of-vinson-centre-for-economics-and-entrepreneurship 
Bethanythornton (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: Spintendo  06:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 14-MAR-2019

message: Hi, The article states that the university has 5 faculties but I see that more than 5 are mentioned on the official website. I would like to know how many faculties there are in the university and what they are called. thanks, Gopico (talk) 14:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: These things change, and this probably means the Wikipedia article is out of date. If there is a reliable source that is more up-to-date, you can update the Wikipedia article with this new reference. For things like the number of faculties, references published by the subject of the article are acceptable (see WP:ABOUTSELF) and a third-party reference isn't necessary. Robminchin (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I hoped that someone that familiar with the university will know the answer. Gopico (talk) 09:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  number of facults
Talk:Mithan

message: * User:Mithan has been adding himself to this page, removing the redirect it originally has. No claim to notability other than being involved in a on-line gaming community. Ifnord 19:27, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

message: * I have tried to enter discourse with this user, apprently new (only edits on this page) who insists on adding a link to his web page or listing himself as a definition for "Mithan" (which was a redirect to Gaur). Normally I would settle this with a listing on AfD, but I don't think the page should be deleted, simply reverted to the redirect. Comments? Ifnord 21:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Came here from the RfC.  Not much to comment on.  Reverted the article.  User:Mithan hasn't edited in a few days, but I have put this on my watchlist.  Jkelly 05:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment
Wikipedia talk:Content assessment

message: Pls can someone help in assessing the article Sugarhill Ddot? Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 13:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Stub 48JCL (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugarhill Ddot -2024 

message: Visa Requirements for US citizens has a B rating, but I keep finding citations completely irrelevant to the detail they claim to be supporting. 伟思礼 (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no such article. In any case, if you feel that an article's rating is inconsistent with its content, you should bring that matter up at the talk page of the article itself. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Redrose64 Visa requirements for United States citizens 48JCL (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

text: I think that was what the dude above was trying to say. 48JCL (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class when citations are wrong?
Talk:Tire manufacturing

message: Steric acid, not static acid, is the filler added.  Steric acid acts as a plasticizer and as a mold release.  Static acid doesn't exist
--74.70.122.165 (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

message: Tire Manufacturing is a complex process, starting with the raw materials which pass several processes to arrive at the finished tire.
The scope of the article is to include both current materials and processes, together with a tire manufacturing history.G4sxe 19:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: complex process

message: Shouldn't you Add Silica in your materials list.  This is a filler used with or instead of Carbon Black in tread and sidewall compounds.  This filler is becoming more widely used in premium tires. Ucplantid 17:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Silica

message: "The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company is trying to adapt. Its raw material of choice now is natural rubber rather than synthetic rubber, made from oil. To sustain profits, it is making more high-end tires for consumers willing to pay upwards of $100 to replace each tire on their cars.
These steps have not been enough, however, particularly now that the cost of natural rubber is also rising sharply, along with that of many other commodities. So Goodyear has raised the prices of its tires by 15 percent in just four months."
It seems that a shift is happening towards using more natural and less synthetic rubber in making tires.  It would be good to get some real data, and integrate into the articles.
-69.87.203.130 (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Natural vs. synthetic rubber

message: This article gives excellent information. It is very hard to find out how tyres are made, and this article gives the required information crisply and cleanly, in good English and without fuss. My thanks to the author, to whom I am seriously indebted! UBJ 43X (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent article
Talk:H. Kramer and Company

message: This is more about advocating Pilsen Environmental Rights and Reform Organization (PERRO) than discussing H. Kramer and Company.--Esprit15d 19:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Removed the hyperbole, but left in the external link as it appears relevent, but2 won't cry if someone else takes it out.  I also took out claims about lead levels without WP:CITEation, and replaced them with ones that had supporting documentation.  I'm not happy about that document being on the PERRO website though.  Unless we can come up with a link to the original it should be removed.  brenneman(t)(c) 01:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the new npov tag off until there are some comments here as to what's POV.  I'm not saying that I would argue against any POV claims, just that none were presented. - brenneman(t)(c) 12:19, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is relatively ancient by Wikipedia standards, but the article reads like an argumentative essay on the recent activities of the company, rather then an article about the subject itself. Mbrickn (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: npov
Talk:Pac-Man Arrangement

message: Reversal of Blinky and Clyde's names witnessed in the copy of ncv2 I have downloaded for Mame0100b. If anyone has seen copies/versions (incl. other platforms) of the game where this does not occur, please inform. Eric B 19:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I own Pac-Man Collection, and the names are reversed there, too.  Odd.  Jeff Silvers 10:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It has been proposed that this article be merged with Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2.  Since nobody has bothered to do so yet, I'm setting up a discussion so we can reach a consensus on this issue. Personally, I don't feel a merge is appropriate; it might be if Pac-Man Arrangement were exclusive to Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2, but it isn't; it has appeared in Pac-Man Collection, Namco Museum Advance, and Namco Museum (128-bit version). Jeff Silvers 11:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed the merge proposal tag for the reason cited above. (It also didn't help any that the person who proposed the merge didn't bother justifying it on this talk page or the talk page for Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2.) Jeff Silvers 01:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: There are 2 completely different games called Pac-Man Arrangement, there is the arcade one that this article is about and there is another one that was originaly released on the PSP in Namco Museum Battle Collection. I think that the PSP Pac-Man Arrangement should have its own article. The reason that the arcade Pac-Man Arrangement has its own article was because it was not exclusive to the Namco Classics collection (see above posts), but the PSP Pac-Man Arrangement has been released several times on different consoles too (PSP, Xbox 360 and Iphone) so surely for the same reasons this needs an article too.
90.198.11.88 (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other Pac-Man Arrangement
Talk:Andreas von Bülow

message: Needs Expanding. SkeenaR 19:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From :de:Bundesministerium_für_Bildung_und_Forschung#Bundesminister_f.C3.BCr_Forschung_und_Technologie_.281974-1994.29 it appears it was a title that existed from 74-94.  It appears Federal Minister for Education and Research is the current title.  Esquizombi 22:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: the taz can be found here . It can not be denied that vB is seen by many, if not most, people as an "anti-semitic conspiracy kook"; the fact thus is an important piece in the article. --HBS 10:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

text: of course it must be denied that "von Bülow is seen by many" as "anti-semitic conspiracy kook". Not even Esther Schapira would make such an outlandish claim. Although from her musings - where she carefully avoids reasoned argument, but heaps insinuation upon insinuation, slander upon lie - something for just about everyone, it seems (Walser, Honderich et al, all anti-Semites in her opinion; von Bülow figures in just about two sentences, one of which is a direct lie) - you would get the impression that the Nazis will take over shortly in Germany, in case they haven't already. I read Schapira's articles from early on, when she was a young freelancer with "Pflasterstrand", the central organ of leftwing radicalism in Frankfurt am Main at the time. Somehow she seems to have drifted away. Nothing but Israel matters, apparently, and anyone who has the GALL to take an ever so slightly different view must be taken to task. The award-winninig film "Paradise Now"? Should not be shown in schools, fishes for sympathies with the wrong people, her own film on suicide attackers is much, much better, of course. Very sad, such zealotry, and definitely not representative for more than a very tiny minority. --Rkrichbaum 09:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KUTH-DT

message: A query of the FCC database lists "UNIVISION TELEVISION GROUP, INC." as the owner of this station. Today an editor using the ip 69.212.127.81 changed the owner line in the infobox to "Equity Broadcasting." However if you check the equity broadcasting webpage, it has an asterisk next to KUTH with a footnote of "*Managed". I would say that Univision should be on the owner line, but I thought I would see what others think about this. A 19:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Univision does own the station, but it is managed by Equity. Univision owns a significant share of Equity, although that will change when the sale of Equity to Coconut Palm Acquisition is finalized. When that happens, ownership of KUTH will also transfer to Coconut Palm. dhett (talk • contribs) 01:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner 

message: The administrators have been cracking down on logos. Especially vulnerable are network logos used in television station articles, so I have replaced the network logo with a station logo. The original logo had a lot of background information, which made it a bit hard to read, so I removed the background. However, the text is a bit muddy, especially in the city identification, so if anyone finds a better-quality station logo, please replace the one in use now. dhett (talk • contribs) 01:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  KUTH logo 

message: Is the channel shown in HD?
if Yes,  Why doesn't Dish Network have it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.222.253 (talk) 06:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  HD 
Talk:Ballistic missile submarine

message: In 1993 a Russian ballistic missile submarine collided with a U.S. general attack submarine. We don’t have a mention of that in “accidents,” but there is a page on it. Should we mention it? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_incident_off_Kola_Peninsula 2601:246:900:34B0:B18E:2E73:1B47:5C8F (talk) 23:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident
Talk:Necho

message: Does anyone have a problem with me changing this into a disambiguation page?--24.58.164.194 19:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: >whines< Sango!! Don't you read talk pages? ;) --ViolinGirl♪ 23:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Routh–Hurwitz theorem

message: Please, compare article to the mathworld entry. In my opinion mathworld entry is much easier to understand. It is even hard to see a connection between the two on first sight.
:What you say is certainly true. There is a rival article Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion which is written in a similar difficult style. I think these contributions are trying to follow the reasoning on the original derivation instead of quoting the simpler way it is always stated nowadays - like in the article you refer to.JFB80 (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Mayasura

message: Mayasura is not the correct name. He is Maya the Danava builder. There is a separate character Mayasura. Imc 17:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The name

message: Brahmanda Purana § 3, Ch. 6, verses 4-13 list Maya as a Danava. Bhagavata Purana Canto 5, Ch. 24, verse 28 also lists Maya as a Danava. I cannot find any sources listing Maya as a Daitya. The information from this page has been linked elsewhere and is muddling things up. Please either cite sources or remove/fix the erroneous information. Edit: Mother is even listed as Danu in infobar.--2604:2D80:DE11:1300:4D8B:8DE4:B733:3E6C (talk) 10:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daitya or Danuva? 
Talk:2003 Baseball Hall of Fame balloting

message: I'm working on creating this page; my current version can be found here. Jpers36 20:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, for now. Jpers36 07:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The above link will probably no longer apply. Jpers36 16:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Work in progress

message: Here are the names of 60 contributors nominated by the Historical Overview Committee (as for 2005 and 2007). Piped links in the 2005 list have been replicated here but I have not checked links where the lists differ.
(The blockquote list is in the article.) --P64 (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributors nominated 

message: Here are the names of 200 players nominated by the Historical Overview Committee (as for 2005 and 2007). The list uses standard nicknames and spellings, including the English alphabet. Piped links in the 2005 list have been replicated here but I have not checked links where the lists differ.
:(The blockquote list is in the article.) --P64 (talk) 18:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Players nominated

message: Here are the election results as crude tables. --P64 (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final ballots 