Talk:Paula Fletcher

message: There are now a number of citations for Ms Fletcher. 
This is now a well cited and sourced page, lets continue to keep this an accurate representation of her. 
I agree with removal of the rink discussion. It seemed problematic and biased.  DowntownK (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I might beg to differ. This page is well-sourced, but it doesn't seem particularly representative. It strikes me that we're taking a number of relatively minor controversies and exaggerating their significance, to a rather serious degree. I'll probably review this article in the near future. CJCurrie (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are really three problems with the information that I removed in my last two edits:
*The information was mostly taken from primary sources. Primary sources are not absolutely forbidden as sources, but they should be used with extreme caution due to the possibility for selective quoting and misrepresentation (see WP:PRIMARY).
*There seems to be a problem with undue weight, as regards the cumulative references to Fletcher's links with the labour movement. That Fletcher has a labour background is not particularly controversial, but the way the information is presented here seems ... well, skewed somehow. It almost seems as though we're harping on the point, and there's a distinct possibility that some readers (and some voters) could interpret this in a negative light. I am not suggesting this was deliberate.
*Some of the information is not specifically relevant to Fletcher. That the labour council supported her is relevant here; that this council made a general statement about its political strategy in the same period is not. CJCurrie (talk) 06:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Explaining my recent edits

message: I removed this section from the article because Fletcher's only involvement was that she sponsored a motion on this subject. This incident is not about Fletcher at all, rather it involves a dispute between Adrian Heaps and Michelle Berardinetti. To a lesser extent it also involves Doug Holyday who launched a lawsuit over the motion and Giorgio Mammoliti and Sandra Bussin who were also included in the lawsuit. I am asking for opinions about this section on whether it should be included in the Fletcher article. Thanks, EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I originally put the text in, I think it is an interesting point that she sponsored this motion. It gives substance to people seeking to understand her actions at council. It is important for readers to note that she sponsored a motion against advice of the City's lawyer. That being said, I don't think her narrative is hurt substantially by its absence. DowntownK (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the libel lawsuit episode to the Heaps and Berardinetti articles. I think this text properly belongs on the Holyday article since he launched a lawsuit about council's actions. Fletcher could still be mentioned in that context. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 19:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal fees reimbursement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Paula Fletcher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429035331/http://www.labourcouncil.ca/LabourActionSpring06.pdf to http://www.labourcouncil.ca/LabourActionSpring06.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429035331/http://www.labourcouncil.ca/LabourActionSpring06.pdf to http://www.labourcouncil.ca/LabourActionSpring06.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430215237/http://archives.xtra.ca/story.aspx?s=14951528 to http://archives.xtra.ca/story.aspx?s=14951528
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130725111443/http://www.toronto.ca/vote2003/results/councillors.pdf to http://www.toronto.ca/vote2003/results/councillors.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100823105914/http://www.cbc.ca:80/toronto/features/torontovotes2006/wards/30.html to http://www.cbc.ca/toronto/features/torontovotes2006/wards/30.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121009144958/http://www.toronto.ca/vote2006/results/councillors.pdf to http://www.toronto.ca/vote2006/results/councillors.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314053407/http://www.insidetoronto.com/news/local/article/72265 to http://www.insidetoronto.com/news/local/article/72265
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100731001947/http://www.torontolife.com:80/daily/informer/city-sindex/2010/05/13/paula-fletcher-accidentally-kills-bike-lanes-she-has-long-championed/ to http://www.torontolife.com/daily/informer/city-sindex/2010/05/13/paula-fletcher-accidentally-kills-bike-lanes-she-has-long-championed/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100912154605/http://www.labourcouncil.ca/endorsed10.pdf to http://www.labourcouncil.ca/endorsed10.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified