lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS Gherardi

message: My father, Ensign W.K. Parks, on route to Tokyo Bay after the A bombs were dropped, received sealed orders to transfer from the DMS Hambelton to the DMS Gherardi along with 13 other naval orders.  Upon entering Tokyo harbor they unsealed their orders.  They had been ordered to destroy all artillery around Tokyo Bay capable of reaching the USS Missouri.  Admiral Nimitz had learned through his intelligence sources that Japaneses soldiers who did not want to surrender were going to sink the Missouri.  The group had one Japanese translator, several explosives experts and a number of combat veteran naval officers like my father, who led a US Marine Corps unit fighting on Okinawa for 30 days doing night fighting.  They had jeeps and destroyed the artillery that intelligence had provided for them and learned from Japanese civilians of other artillery, which they also destroyed.  In many cases, the Japanese abandoned their artillery.  In a few, they had to eliminate the Japanese soldiers defending the artillery before they could destroy it.  The mission was classified as top secret until 1967 when it was declassified. 2600:1700:9530:E000:9400:9A5C:497E:BFBB (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DMS Gherardi deployment int Tokyo Bay on August 19, 1945 prior to the surrender on the USS Missouri on September 2, 1945.
Talk:Peacemakers (book)

message: This entire section was added by an account named Kahalliburton and signed with "Kent Allen Halliburton, History of Modern Europe, Texas Wesleyan University". 
As an absolute minimum, I will remove the signiture, but this is very likely a copyright violation (if the text is published somewhere else) or OR (if the account is indeed Kent Allen Halliburton). --Xeeron (talk) 15:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research? Copyright?
Talk:USS Stockton (DD-646)

message: On the Wikipedia page for the USS Stockton DD-646 the following statement, “While off Biak, she received minor damage when hit by a shell from a shore battery on 28 May”. That statement fails to take into account the death of one of Stockton’s crew members. I’m sure to him, and his family it was not a minor damage situation. My father, now deceased, Calvin D. Sprowls served aboard the Stockton and the man killed that day was a good friend. Unfortunately I do not recall that sailor’s name, but May he Rest In Peace. Joesprowls (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combat Death of a Stockton Crew Member
Talk:USS Tillman (DD-641)

message: A reader supplied several images associated with the USS Tillman.
Three of them depict events related to the surrender of Yap Island.
I added two of these to the article.
The third:
:File:USS Tillman (DD-641) Japanese atoll commander surrendering Yap Island.jpg
is arguably the most relevant, but I cannot make out the Japanese atoll commander in the photo, so I did not add this one.
A fourth image:
:File:USS Tillman (DD-641) photo from on board.jpg
was taken on board the vessel. I will leave it to other editors to determine whether the image should be used.
The photos were taken by William Winnerling Jr. who served on the vessel. We received another image which is a photo of William Winnerling Jr., but I have not uploaded it, as we do not know who the photographer is, so cannot confirm permission.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 12:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos added today
Talk:Alpine skiing at the 2006 Winter Paralympics

message: I'm pretty sure this is vandalism, but it was on the section for "Women's Super-G - Visually Impaired" for three years. I'm pretty sure it's that no one noticed it, but three years? So is there a slim possibility it was actually voted for such a thing?--T. Anthony (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voted as the funniest sport to watch ever?
Talk:USS Nahant (SP-1250)

message: Replaced old blue infobox with newest type of ship infobox and populated infobox with data. Revised text to include text from  --  both  -- DANFS sources, rather than just one. Added introductory paragraph. Minor eds, fixes. Removed two black hole-punch holes from photo and leveled photo as water level was not horizontally flat.Wikited (talk) 00:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page
Talk:StarStruck (Philippine TV program)

message: They may not satisfy WP:BIO. --Howard the Duck 13:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not link names of the contestants 

message: Is there any news on this? It doesn't seem to have anything about it on the page. I shall research, though. XD Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 11:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming "StarStruck: The Star Explosion"? 

message: This article needs MAJOR cleanup. The Trivia section is too long and has a lot of original, unverified research. Plus, the entire article needs some copy editing (the grammar on some sections is HORRIBLE). That being said, I've placed the  tag on the page. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Hey...can someone with ample knowledge of the happenings in s4 of starstruck put a table in the article??...
I want to...but I don't have enough info...--Ja 1207 (talk) 12:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 4 Table... 
Talk:USS Namakagon

message: The information contained in this article is covered in USS Namakogon (AOG-53) which is already wikified. (Note: that there is a variance in spelling. Wiki lists the ship as Namakogon as does the newer DANFS entry, not Namakagon.)  Wikited 17:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay now I'm thoroughly baffled - your link is to a page that is thoroughly Namakagon. Maralia 21:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Are you calling this link NavSource Online: Service Ship Photo Archive - AOG-53 Namakogon the 'second DANFS link'? That link is not DANFS - it's a third-party, non-Navy source, as I mentioned on your talk page, so it's probably not that relevant that they have misspelled it. Maralia 21:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Spider and the Fly (song)

message: DeGange makes several comparisons/references to country music.  I don't get it and more importantly, other references don't seem to support this.  As Jagger says, it's a Jimmy Reed-style song.  Other writers make a similar point, with one writing that it "is a twelve-bar blues very much in the Chess tradition [and] resembles the Chess sound to such an extent that it could have been recorded at the legendary at the legendary studios."  The lyrics have more of a story line than the typical AAB blues, which is what DeGagne may be describing as "the form of a cheatin' heart country tune".  However, musically, the guitar intro, harp, loping bass line, etc., is pure Reed.  DeGagne also is mistaken about the song's first release as a UK B-side and the harp playing sounds more like Brian Jones, so I'm not sure how credible he is. I plan to add some more referenced material to the article and maybe move DeGange to a footnote. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike DeGagne's AllMusic review
Talk:Kenneth Ma

message: , :File:Kenneth Ma Kwok Ming 20161231.jpg is worth keeping despite its poor quality because there is no alternative and it isn't "almost impossible to discern said subject." I don't know the man and now that I've seen the picture, I could identify him. I'll put up an image-needed tag so the image can be replaced by something better as soon as possible. —A L T E R C A R I  ✍ 00:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of blurry image
Talk:USS Mariveles

message: Sadly, putting "This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships" at the foot of the article does not meet the standard of "It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations", which is Wikipedia's minimum requirement.
Can I encourage any editor to use this source, and others if appropriate, and insert appropriate inline citations. As a broad rule, one reference at the end of each paragraph, which fully covers any facts in that paragraph, is an acceptable minimum. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Talk:Roland SH-101

message: 'Fat' should not be used as a qualifier for sound on wikipedia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.3.212.160 (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

message: * 808 State
* Acen
* The Alarm
* Altered Images
* Angelspit
* Aphex Twin
* Apoptygma Berzerk
* Assemblage 23
* Astral Projection
* Black Strobe
* Blur
* Boards of Canada
* Ceephax Acid Crew
* cEvin Key (Skinny Puppy, Doubting Thomas, Download)
* Chikinki
* Chris & Cosey
* Chromeo
* CocoRosie
* Crystal Castles
* Daft Punk
* David Ball (Soft Cell, The Grid)
* Deadmau5
* Devo
* Dirk Ivens (Absolute Body Control, Klinik, Dive)
* Steve Hillier of Dubstar
* Eat Static
* Electrosexual
* Etnica
* Eurythmics
* Epoxies
* Fabrice Lig
* Factory Floor
* The Flashbulb
* Freeez
* Gesaffelstein
* Gorillaz
* Hallucinogen
* Haltya
* Larry Heard
* Hot Chip
* The Infinity Project
* Imperial Bedrooms
* Jean Michel Jarre
* John Foxx and the Maths
* Joker
* Juno Reactor
* Kaiser Chiefs
* Kai Tracid
* KMFDM
* The Knife
* Koxbox
* LCD Soundsystem
* Late of the Pier
* Lego Feet
* Little Boots
* Luke Vibert
* Mansun
* Minilogue
* MFG
* Miranda
* MSTRKRFT
* MWNN
* Neon Indian
* Newcleus
* Nitzer Ebb
* Orbital
* Ott
* Of Montreal
* Peaches
* PIG
* Portishead
* The Prodigy
* Richard Daniel Roman
* Sébastien Tellier
* Showbread
* Simon Posford
* Slawomir Losowski
* Slinky Wizard
* Snap!
* Squarepusher
* Sublime
* System of a Down
* Thomas Dolby
* Total Eclipse
* Trans-X
* Transwave
* Vince Clarke (Yazoo)
* X-Dream
* Yann Tiersen
* Zoot Woman
I moved the list of "notable users" here because it was wholly unsourced. If these musicians' association with the instrument was important, a secondary source will note it, and we should cite it in reference. Until then, let's keep unsourced stuff out of mainspace. czar 14:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced list
Talk:Roland Jupiter-6

message: What's so notable about these users?
Wikipedia is not a soapbox or vehicle for self promotion.
While some of those users might be notable, others should be removed.  
Also , you might want to put WHY they are notable in their use of the Six.  ALSO, some are users of the 8, not the 6, like Duran Duran.
You might want to link to articles (dig up some old Keyboard Magazines!!! or Roland Users Group magazines!!!) and cite those as sources.
If you don't know how to make a proper academic citation, just type the Magazine, Date, Page number, and Article author into the wikipedia main article.
Someone will fix it up later.  But it's better than no source!!!! Jdubowsky (talk) 04:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable users
Talk:Rogers Hi-Speed Internet

message: I have Rogers internet and I would like to say a few things. First off, is there REALLY a limit on what you can download? Because I haven't gotten any warnings at all about 75% bandwidth or whatever, and I've downloaded quite a lot. And if there is, is there anyway to pay to raise it?
Also, I DID see 1 warning a few days ago, saying Rogers will raise the internet speed from 7MB to 10MB by June 5. Maybe this should be added. (Sorry, I don't have a picture.) --MasterOfTheXP (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah there is a limit. Next time I get a warning I'll take a screenshot to show you. It will show up at the top of any webpage (it's injected) with a link to acknowledge that you received it. If you have multiple users in your household then maybe someone else is seeing it if you go over 75%. Hacktivist (talk) 18:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question and Comment

message: I'm curious if there is any confirmed test results of this controversy. The only two links right now link to two nerd rage articles where the only source of information is users. I have the Extreme plan and am a heavy downloader and always download at over one megabyte per second and upload at over 100 kilobytes per second. Since I am also a user and my results aren't a proper source I would be interested in seeing actual verifiable results of this claim.
Hacktivist (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From personal experience, Rogers certainly does throttle BT traffic. That said I don't think they throttle encrypted traffic any more; since I started encrypting all my BT traffic I haven't had a problem. Telanis (talk) 17:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bandwidth Throttling Controversy
Talk:Staines Informer

message: This article reads like an advertisement for the subject of the article. Just about all of the second paragraph, save perhaps the first sentence, should be cut. That would leave a very short article which raises the question: "does this warrant a WP article at all?". 
Wayne aus (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity
Talk:USS Gettysburg (1858)

message: This article, USS Gettysburg (1858), and SS Douglas (1858) clearly relate to the same ship. Each has valuable information missing from the other, though neither is amazingly well sourced. "USS Gettysburg (1858)" seems the more appropriate title, and that page currently receives more hits. Harrias talk 11:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:St Mary's College, Ipswich

message: Please remove the irelevant warnings about the content and the author conflict. College Webmaster  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.241.35 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove the irelevant warnings about the content and the author conflict. College Webmaster
Talk:USS Nanshan

message: The following are quoted from the article:
 In Chinese, "Nanshan" means "south mountain" and refers to a small group of mountains in Guangdong Province. The ship retained her former name in naval service.
 purchased at Hong Kong on 6 April 1898 from Frank Smythe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I created the article for the mountains some time ago, and I came across this article just now. It seems that the group of mountains fits the  descriptions given in the article. From what I know the name Nanshan is not specifically for these two mountains only, a number of other mountains in other places of China bear the same name. However, if you are do a little bit of searching, you'll find that 1. they are a small group of mountains (only 2 of them) 2.they are located right next to Hong Kong across a bay (about 3 kilometers between the nearest points of the two) 3. Yes they are located in Guangdong Province. Hence I personally consider these are the mountains the ship was named after, but I have yet to find sources for this. I am just interested to know really. Can anyone help?    Wishva de Silva (talk) 06:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the group of mountains this ship was named after : '''[[Nanshan (mountain)]]''' ?
Talk:Columbia University School of Social Work

message: One of the early lecturers at the then School of Philanthropy was Mary Richmond. She was giving classes on practical social work as Kennedy lecturer in 1914. --Kolya (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable faculty
Talk:Sri Lanka national football team

message: Who is the coach of Sri Lanka, the last official match it was Jang Jung, before him it was Anthony Balandera. Is it 100% proof that he has been replaced by Juan Barbas
Druryfire (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: National Team Coach

message: I removed some copyvio text that was a verbatim copy of a source. I'm leaving the citation here in case it breaks an other references in the article and for future use.  Baffle☿gab 00:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed reference

message: can I join your club 2402:4000:B195:A6D:BA38:CABD:BDB0:960E (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can I join to your club  
Talk:Canberra Vikings

message: How can they be rivals with the Melbourne Rebels.  The competition has not even started, and the two sides have never played.  --Spewmaster 07:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's total speculation! I would suggest if they were to have a rival it would be a Sydney team!! I have removed it. ronan.evans 07:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rivals ???? 
Talk:USS Leonard F. Mason

message: The Chaffroc was not the device that malfunctioned in the Linebacker mission. It was a different device that used the exhaust from the stacks to carry a bundle of chaff away from the ship as it bloomed. It was used successfully in previous missions. However, during the mission mentioned in the article, instead of launching a bundle, the device misfired and streamed the chaff out. To establish my credentials, I was the operator of that device. I will edit the article as needed.Cosmicship (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Linebacker 

message: The link change to the site has been tagged possible conflict of interest. It is not. As the webmaster of the site, I have moved it to a new service provider. The site will continue to grow at the new location and be of further usefulness to those studying the history of the ship and the events it participated in. I believe the reason the system tagged it as a possible conflict is because my user name is cosmicship and the domain name of the new site has cosmicship in it. Cosmicship (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Leonard F. Mason Website
Talk:USS Union (AKA-106)

message: Sadly, putting "This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships" at the foot of the article does not meet the standard of "It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations", which is Wikipedia's minimum requirement. Can I encourage any editor to use this source, and others if appropriate, and insert appropriate inline citations. As a broad rule, one reference at the end of each paragraph, which fully covers any facts in that paragraph, is an acceptable minimum. Gog the Mild (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing
Talk:USS Salish

message: Merging this article with the ARA General Belgrano is a ridiculous suggestion, they're different ships, were attacked under completely different circumstances, there is no merit whatsoever in such a suggestion.  Justin talk 12:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my mistake, I'll remove tags.  Gene Nygaard (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Merge 

message: This ship have been for the last 40 years and still is the Alferez Sobral, can we changed the article name or even better split it ?? --Jor70 (talk) 20:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with moving it. Ryan4314  (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with you, guys. The notability of USS Salish is clearly overshadowed by the operational history of ARA Sobral. The Argentine vessel endured the attack of two choppers armed with antiship missiles and survived an ordeal of several days with her bridge in tatters. She was also the first warship since the time of the war of Independence to have her commander KIA. Enough stuff for an article of her own, I guess.--Darius (talk) 16:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with you guys but the usual protocol is to split it.  Justin the Evil Scotman talk 16:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Relient K discography

message: Ahhh errmm. How do i say this? No such thing. Search google, this is the only page that comes up. Australias shocking music industry only has one chart. So where did this charting come from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiac (talk • contribs) 13:04, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Modern Rock Charts 

message: I am not an authoritative source, but it seems that the Covers section could use a bit of a cleanup. I just removed one redundant bullet point, and perhaps it could be reduced further, or put into a more readable format.Josejuan05 (talk) 08:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover Songs

message: The discography is for official releases only. If this chart publishes its methodology in order to be confirmed as a reliable chart then it should be included in the singles chart, not in its own section. If it can't be confirmed as a reliable chart then it shouldn't be included at all. WP:V, WP:RS, WP:N need to be followed for all additions. --JD554 (talk) 10:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What more is needed other than links to make it reliable? Forgive me if I do not understand all of the Wikipedia rules for posting things, but I thought I did what was asked, which was provide links. Sorry if I am wrong.JesusFreak89 (talk) 20:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a discography of official releases. If they are official releases then they belong in the singles table, not in their own table. Please see WP:DISCOG for how other discographies are set out. --JD554 (talk) 06:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian Radio singles
Talk:SpringCM

message: I've re-instituted the image and provided a fair use rationale. --LtKrebs 16:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Springcm logo.jpg Update
Talk:Fatherland for All

message: The fact that the party supports Maduro pretty much automatically disqualifies it from being part of the communist left, and a quick perusal of the Spanish Wikipedia page for this party makes it clear that it's democratic socialist, not left communist. The communist left absolutely does not advocate an electoral road to socialism, which this party does.--Masque (talk) 03:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not left communist
Talk:Sport Klub

message: Pozdrav iz Kentucky 2600:1700:8AE0:1DD0:9120:323C:DEB5:1708 (talk) 21:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pozdrav iz Kentucky  grad Bowling Green
Talk:Sport1 (Eastern Europe)

message: There was a design-change at the TV, so another logo is used. See on huwiki.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.241.183 (talk) 22:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design-change
Talk:Pro Arena

message: I had no idea they owned Sport.ro aswell. Should have imagined it though, judging by their show list.Bravemuta 21:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central European Media Enterprises 
Talk:Powerhouse (TV series)

message: Did this air on Nickelodeon at some later point, or are my memories faulty? Lambertman (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember watching it on Nickelodeon. DonIago (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick?
Talk:USS Taussig

message: The ship is gone. Can find no reference to ship as a museum anywhere. No photos, blog entries, websites. Nothing on Google Earth. Zip zilch nada. Somebody partially edited the Allen M. Sumner page explaining the ship was scrapped in 2013. The Taussig page and the Allen M. Sumner page should be updated to show this. I tried but was botted back.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.64.16.84 (talk) 02:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We need a reliable source that says it was scrapped. I don't think we can say it must be scrapped because I couldn't find it on Google. As for original research, that can not be used as a source, I can see it on Google Earth tied to the pier up to November 15, 2013, but it was moved by Feb 7, 2014. It was said to be the most outboard ship in a nest of three, in 2009. And looking at historical images on google earth it had been moved around a few times, so without a source, we don't really know where it was moved to. I'm with you on the scrapping, we just need a source. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Taussig scrapped.