Talk:EROS (microkernel)

message: Oh thats sad.  Some of my favorite research papers were based on Eros.  RIP.  I hate how cool grad projects just loose the drive, loose the initiative over time.  Its sad.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.250.120.197 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 16 November 2005  (UTC)
Not to worry. The reports of our demise were exaggerated. EROS has two successor systems, both of which look like they will see real commercial use. The Strawberry Group (Charlie Landau et al.) is building on the EROS work under the name CapROS (see ). The other successor is Coyotos (see ), which is correcting some of the architectural deficiencies that we found in EROS. --shap 03:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: The term “safety” is used repeatedly, in a specific technical sense, with no definition. -Ahruman (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Safety”? 

message: I was reading the article and I *THINK* I may have spotted a grammatical mistake.  The line now reads:
EROS is purely a research operating system, and was never deployed in real world use.
Shouldn't it read
EROS is purely a research operating system, and was never deployed for real world use.?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rricci428 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible grammatical mistake? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on EROS (microkernel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060203013048/http://www.coyotos.org:80/ to http://www.coyotos.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031029002231/http://www.eros-os.org:80/ to http://www.eros-os.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article says
but, as far as I know, the SDS Sigma series was 1) not capability-based and 2) not originally designed for use in telephony switches.
Perhaps this was intended to refer to the Plessey System 250, which was 1) capability-based and 2) designed for use in telephony switches.
(I'd just change it, but Shapiro himself made that edit, so I won't assume he was mistaken.)  Guy Harris (talk) 02:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDS Sigma 7 a capability-based system? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on EROS (microkernel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~petel/papers/pcc/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120731181325/http://www.coyotos.org/docs/misc/eros-comparison.html to http://www.coyotos.org/docs/misc/eros-comparison.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.coyotos.org/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121220202220/http://www.coyotos.org/~shap/ to http://www.coyotos.org/~shap/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified