lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:U.S. Marshals (film)

message: I corrected the spelling of 'Gerard' in a quote from ReelViews. ReelViews uses the spelling "Girard" throughout the review, but obviously this is in error. Aristan (talk) 03:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character name spelling in quote 

message: The movie is described as a spin-off.  To me, this implies that the movie focuses more on something introduced in the first movie, but this isn’t really the case.
I would describe it as a “stand-alone sequel” (already well-defined here on Wikipedia)
It’s not a huge deal, I’m just curious to see what others think
MWFwiki (talk) 04:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How have sources described it? DonIago (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I’m not sure what is accepted as source for this sort of thing; I don’t normally edit on this side of WP. That being said, preliminary Googling indicates that it is either described as “the sequel to 1993 film The Fugitive” while I also see “sequel/spin-off” used. IMDB uses “sequel” it would seem. The WP sequel article describes a “stand-alone sequel” as “…a work set in the same universe, yet has very little, if any, narrative connection to its predecessor, and can stand on its own without a thorough understanding of the series.” Not for nothing, but the article doesn’t currently have a source backing its description as a “spin-off,” either…MWFwiki (talk) 06:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb isn't reliable, so its description is immaterial in any case. Personally I'd be hesitant to use 'spin-off', when as far as I know there were never any follow-ups to this film, but that may be my own bias creeping in. If 'stand-alone sequel' is a reasonable description of this film, then I don't have an issue with that. Without reviewing the article itself, I guess the best argument for 'spin-off' would be if this film had been intended to launch a franchise of its own. DonIago (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-off versus stand-alone sequel?
Talk:World War III (1998 film)

message: I know March 12, 1990 was set as the starting point for World War III as that is when the Soviets invaded West Germany. However when I watched the movie, a huge battle took place on February 18, 1990 between Soviet and NATO naval forces in the North Atlantic. The narrator stated that though NATO had won the battle by dusk, the Third World War had begun. Experiment632 (talk) 23:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War III Starting Point
Talk:Xiu Xiu: The Sent Down Girl

message: (Plot description): 
"Lao Jin, emasculated and docile, can only watch in sadness as Xiu Xiu loses hope in the system and in herself." 
Is "docile" really a/ the right word to use here, for a (free?) human being? 
To me (I am no native speaker of English so cannot be completely sure if my feeling is right or wrong) it seems this word is used to describe kept animals and speaking of enslaved people or of people whom the (racist) speaker regards as unequal, animal-like etc. - 
does this fit here?? or am I just wrong? 2A02:3030:80D:B019:1:0:F032:BCAB (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "docile"?
Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1997 film)

message: Sources for this TV movie likely exist – it looks like there was more than one article on this in Dayton Daily News on March 23, 1997, and other articles in the The Daily News Journal and The Daily Herald (Utah). There is also a Variety review: , and a LA Times article on both 1997 adaptations . And Entertainment Weekly mentions its ratings in passing: .
I'll go ahead and remove the  tag, but someone needs to source this article (and better source the other one), especially with the reviews that I can't directly access. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources likely exist
Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1997 miniseries)

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1997 Hallmark film) § Sources likely exist.  Discussion of sources there is directly relevant here as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1997 Hallmark film)#Sources likely exist|Talk:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1997 Hallmark film) §&nbsp;Sources likely exist]]

message: where is the mention of the giant octopus that attacks the diving bell - that was a decent section of the movie. 57.135.212.250 (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the Plot
Talk:4 Little Girls

message: What about including the two convictions following the release of the movie. See the articles.
:https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/movies/2023/10/05/spike-lee-brooklyn-museum-colin-kaepernick/
:https://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/13/us/birmingham-bombing-timeline/index.html
Also, Spike Lee says the reopening of the investigation followed the movie by one day. This is not mentioned here or in the article on 16th Street Baptist Church bombing.
2A02:1210:2642:4A00:F599:9BED:DF00:5442 (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrests?
Talk:Addicted to Love (film)

message: Cracked.com points out how messed up this film is, and how it does several things that in real life would get you arrested. This could potentially be added to the article if the Critical response section was improved and expanded (which I might do eventually, but not today). -- 109.77.198.5 (talk) 23:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cracked
Talk:All Over Me (film)

message: Directtv  &  ifc  have a different year.
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 13:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ 1996 ]][[ 1997 ]] 
Talk:Michael Jackson's Ghosts

message: I think it should be noted here that this film is listed on the Guiness World Records as the longest music video ever. Check this article if you wanna be sure. BrowndRemastered 09:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Record 

message: Anyone know what the classical piece is that's playing on the backround while the ghouls walk on the walls? Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.103.40.168 (talk) 23:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Classical music used in the film
Talk:Joachim Frederick, Elector of Brandenburg

message: I have finished a namespace correction, keeping the history of the original redirect and current pages intact per User:Olessi's request, which was posted on my user page. If there are any questions, please post the replies here, then notify me on my talk page that you have replied here. Thank you. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 02:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namespace correction finished
Talk:In the Company of Men

message: "The film currently has an 88% Fresh rating at the movie review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, with 46 out of 52 critics rating it "Fresh".
How does bullshit like this find it's way into an encyclopaedia?
--No clue.  This whole article sucks.  This is probably the worst-written article I've ever seen on Wikipedia.  Was this someone's high-school essay on this movie?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.182.86 (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullshit 
Talk:In the Heat of the Sun

message: It's also talked about in"
* Larson, Wendy. From Ah Q to Lei Feng: Freud and revolutionary spirit in 20th century China. Stanford University Press, 2009. , 9780804700757
WhisperToMe (talk) 02:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff
Talk:Jungle Emperor Leo

message: This entire article was ripped straight from this url, and has been like that for over a year. I don't see any permission for the text's appearance here, either on its original page or otherwise. If permission's already been given, mea culpa, but I'd suggest making it more visible, if that's the case. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights for more info. -- Sarrandúin [ Talk + Contribs ] 06:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Kiss the Girls (1997 film)

message: Plot overview needs editing for clarity due to unclear and overcomplicated writing. Particularly difficult to understand sections below: 
“Dr. Kate McTiernan is a reputed doctor and an enthusiastic boxer. She lives alone, and she has an undying urge to fight back. Unbeknownst to her, she has just checked all the boxes for the serial abductor.”
“Later, she sees a person in a mask who explains to her why he captured her. He is deeply in love with her since she is a very talented woman.”
“Alex goes to the internet and searches for the buyers of the drug called Sistol from the last five years. He finds out a plastic surgeon named Will Rudolph ordered a lot of Sistol two years ago. But the intriguing part is that using a Sistol for plastic surgery is forbidden.
So he ordered it under the terms of curing leukemia. But, in a small place, ordering such a huge amount of Sistol makes Alex doubt Rudolph more.” Bongdongwong (talk) 22:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot overview
Talk:Leprechaun 4: In Space

message: This article was a stub when I found it, and contained many spelling and punctuation errors. I have expanded it, clarified it, added references and detail, and generally improved it. I still would not rate it as an excellent article, and it needs further attention from someone familiar with this series. - KB 05:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Work. 

message: This whole article is in a shambles. The norder in section needs to be redone, the body count section needs to go, the plot needs to be expanded, not quoted. Just...Alot. I don't know how much I can do as I havent seen the movie. But I'll try. DurinsBane87 06:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow 

message: I just watched this horribly bad, but humorous movie (great drinking Halloween flick, i must add). And I wrote a plot synopsis from memory. Feel free to edit for flaws, grammar, spelling or sentence building. Can't wait to see Leprechaun in the Hood.
--Popoi 08:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:Love and Death on Long Island

message: I do not believe that John Hurt's character is back in England at the end of the film watching Hotpants College III. There's no indication that he is in the theatre or that it is in England. A car goes by the front of the cinema and the driver is on the right hand. I believe this film is a comedy, a spoof of Love And Death In Venice. (The title is not Death In Venice). My friend thought that John Hurt committed suicide at the end. If he did'nt then who died? Why is it Love And Death In Long Island? The scene of Hotpants College III we see at the end may be a fantasy sequence, since it is the scene which John Hurt's character wrote for his script, which we can probably assume was never made. Hotpants College seems to be like Porky's, and I'm sure that's intentional. That's what it's supposed to be. In the scene we see in the theatre from Hotpants College III Jason Priestly is giving a eulogy in a cemetary and quoting Walt Whitman, another gay author, just as John Hurt's character wrote it in his script. And what about the insanely long faxed letter he sends to Jason Priestly (who is playing a character probably based on himself)? Is it a suicide note? I think so. What does the book say? 14:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Mighty Ducks the Movie: The First Face-Off

message: I believe this page should simply be a redirect to the series the "movie" is compiled from, that is, Mighty Ducks (TV series). There's not enough information for it to really stand on it's own other than to be an eternal stub.--HamatoKameko 06:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: . -DJSasso (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge/redirect. 
Talk:Money Talks (1997 film)

message: Is this movie even relevant enough to have the main Money Talks page?
BlueChainsawMan (talk) 08:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert this to Disambiguation page? 

message: A requested move discussion at Talk:Money Talks (disambiguation) regarding this page is underway. Discussion and opinions are invited.   —  AjaxSmack  01:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Category talk:Free optical disc authoring software

message: CDBurnerXP Pro must be removed.  I do not know how to.  The source is not available for download, it does not meet the criteria for being in the category as "free software" or "open source".  it's freeware, which is NOT the same thing.  Please remove CDBurnerXP Pro.--Ghee22 02:33, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This software burns CDs, DVDs, HD DVD and Blu-ray and is completely free. I don't think it is OpenSource though, so perhaps that is why it is not listed here?
217.44.50.228 (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDBurnerXP 

message: How about ImbBurn? Isn';t that a free software? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nickolasemp (talk • contribs) 10:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about ImbBurn? 

message: Somebody please add DVDFlick-It's licensed under GPL.Gauravjuvekar (talk) 05:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pls add
Talk:One Eight Seven

message: The following sentence struck me as drawing unsupported conclusions, not to mention being somewhat contradictory: "After Benny is found dead in the Los Angeles River, apparently of a drug overdose, it becomes clear that Garfield, having slowly lost his sanity, has taken justice into his own hands, playing by the rules of the street in an intense contest with César and the K.O.S."  As it stands, this sentence equates "playing by the rules of the street" with "losing one's sanity."  There is nothing in the film to suggest that Garfield is insane according to a medical definition.  In fact, there is a long dialog in the movie that makes it clear that Garfield has made a very deliberate decision to play by the rules of the street when he feels it is justified.  If this is considered "insane," then all the gangster figures in the movie (and in other films) must be insane as well.  If anything, we can point out the tension (and contradictions) between the standard morality of the teaching profession and the morality of gang violence, but that doesn't mean the character has lost his sanity.  He has simply adopted a different code of ethics, one that is actually closer to the prevailing code of ethics shared by many students in the film.  (The fact that a teacher can be desperate enough to adopt those ethics is a major point of the film; to call him simply insane ignores that sad fact.)  For these reasons, I removed that clause from the sentence. 24.62.5.186 (talk) 21:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost his sanity?
Talk:General Motors GMT platform

message: I think we should have some mentioning of where the frames are manufactured. I would put it in myself, but im not too knowledgable about it. All I know is that that the GMT 800 and the GMT 900 platforms were and are constructed here in my hometown of St. Thomas, Ontario Canada. Does anyone know more than that? --Reaper X 02:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction
Talk:Pardes (1997 film)

message: It would be great to see an explanation for some things I believe don't make sense to Westerners, who may come to the page to try to find out. Was it just a very bad joke when Rajiv caused Ganga to pour all the sugar into the tea, or was there more to it? Also, do most Indian families have a servant, and is there a caste difference? What was the meaning of the corn Arjun brought to Ganga? Were there no legal repercussions for Ganga's father if he killed both Arjun and Ganga? What were the dancers in the temple, are they always there and is that a traditional kind of dance? What was the meaning of the immodest yellow dancer? What building was the scene filmed in where Ganga confronts Arjun? When Rajiv's father accepted Arjun as his son and gave him a ceremonial-looking slap, was it a ceremony and was it significant?  I think if these things have meaning, adding them in where it makes sense in the plot would be very helpful for Western visitors to this page. 172.10.238.180 (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would someone add Indian cultural explanations that Westerners won't understand? 

message: The plot synopsis is very shallow, not explaining the deeper issues in the culture clash that make the movie more meaningful. Because there seems to be no one else here discussing, and possibly there is no one monitoring the page at all, I'm making some additions to the synopsis. If they are not appropriate, please revert or modify. 172.10.238.180 (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding some depth to the plot synopsis 
Talk:The Peacemaker (1997 film)

message: i think they were delta operators  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonybond (talk • contribs) 17:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special force unit 

message: Out of pure curiosity, could the nuke also have been "disabled" by cutting the wires? It would have been a lot less dramatic (since less effort would be required), but would that have worked?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.202.161.113 (talk) 23:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cutting the wires
Talk:Prefontaine (film)

message: The film includes some drama from 1972 Olympic Games. The terror attack set back the competition days, including Pre's event. Insights from the Olympic Village and some interaction with other athletes, including worries of the coaches on the location of Mark Spitz is noted. 
Peace protesters are part of the early moments of the movie, noticed by Pre upon his arrival to the University. 
All in all, there are some fine political scenes that are worthy of mention, within the movie and Steve's life and struggles as an athlete.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rauterkus (talk • contribs) 23:57, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympic Moments
Talk:Red Corner

message: This page was originally about the movie Red Corner. Someone then inserted information about a gym with the same name into the article. I reverted the article back to a movie only version. If you feel that a page about the gym is necessary, I suggest making a new page called Red Corner (Gym) and transferring text from the archived version of this article. MadDreamChant 20:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Corner Gym revert

message: What's the point of having a spoilers warning at the very beginning of the article? People who haven't seen the movie must read at their own risk if they want to know anything about it? And the plot description only tells generalities; it's not like it is spoiling much. -- Andrés D. 23:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers warning 

message: Is it worth noting that a broadcast got interrupted once ? -- Beardo (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: @Beardo Yes, that power failure in 2001 on BBC One. 89.172.140.209 (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, my comment was directed at a section about that, which I did not think notable enough. It was removed about 8 years ago. -- Beardo (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcasting section
Talk:Rough Riders (miniseries)

message: Anyone have any idea why Germans are present in the film and why they are fighting against the USA when the film is about the Spanish-American war?1812ahill (talk) 00:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article contains some interesting info about Henry Nash.  Where is the documentation for it?  I ask only for reasons of personal interest.  I'd like to read more about him.67.45.106.139 (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the documentation about Henry Nash? 

message: I've just here to say thank you for listing the historical inaccuracies in a fiction movie. 71.220.219.16 (talk) 19:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Inaccuracies
Talk:Shadow Conspiracy

message: Cosmatos was noted for hiring out his DGA credentials. Varlaam (talk) 01:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No he wasn't. You shouldn't post such statements with nothing backing it up. - Gothicfilm (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who in fact directed?
Talk:She's So Lovely

message: I don't think this article does justice to the movie, this movie is far more complex and bizarre than a "romantic comedy" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.77.37 (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * I don#t think that there is any article, just oustanding information, no plot no story, neither the production's real conditions written down. I saw it yesterday, actors visible by pushing emotions and no real pschychological development in.
Ma(y) be after the death of John Cassavetas the times had been changed and to trie to do a film like him isn't the right house number. Desperate and hurting each others in a close love relation isn't enough to tell. Looking at hurts me either and that differs from father Cassavetas stile, there is the hidden frame of society build up and the figures crash reasonable against.
Missing these frames!--Danaide (talk) 09:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  E P
Talk:Soul Food (film)

message: Soul food is referenced by Huey in the boondocks on S1 E10 should we include this in a “in popular culture” section? Melofy (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:Steel (1997 film)

message: Tip of the hat to whomever wrote that plot summary. 59.66.241.98 (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I have assessed the article at B-class for WP:FILM. The plot definitely needs to be expanded. See if there are any movie spoiler sites or consider giving the film another viewing (if you can manage the highly-received film). The article will need further expansion to reach GA class. Good work on the article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:29, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class

message: Please stop adding the Nostalgia critic's review. The reviews on that site are from a non-notable critics using a self-published source.Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nostalgia critic
Talk:Suicide Kings

message: New to wiki editing, i understand where you shouldn't put the tag where it says "plot" anything, however i feel to the average user, seeing "plot details" isn't exactly a waring that "HEY HERES THE WHOLE MOVIE", my 2 cents, you more exp'd guys and gals out there can change it back if need be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.23.126.41 (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Spoiler Tag 

message: The plot summary was overlong so I've trimmed it back to the version in an older revision . --Tony Sidaway 17:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: This just pops up in the last few lines, no explanation on relationship to the other cahracters. Is Elise Avery's sister?
ROxBo (talk) 03:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Elise?

message: Perhaps a link to Suicide King somewhere to show from where the film got it's name? --DonOmerta (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: FYI, I think the theme song to the film is named "shattered" by Remmy Zero.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gizziiusa (talk • contribs) 22:11, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Song