lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Private Peaceful

message: Who wrote the plot summary? Seriously, it looks like it was done by a four-year-old. Laparaparapa 19:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot Summary 

message: See Private Peaceful - Michael Murpurgo--User:Rock2e  Talk - Contribs  11:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Articles

message: Is the plot summary just a tad too long? I've been searching the help pages for some guidance but haven't come across anything yet. Anybody any thoughts? Whoosher (talk) 19:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: I would really like to know who added this 'lovely' entry. 
"One day the trio are at the pond and Molly takes off her clothes. they go skinny dipping and then wach molly change and look at her thing sexy body. the like her soft breasts and her squishy behind."
I'm editing that.
QuietusExtraho (talk) 15:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathetic. 

message: Why is this obvious nonsense just sitting there? 207.35.33.162 (talk) 23:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daksh Meherotra 

message: 207.35.33.162 (talk) 23:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix me
Talk:Caitlin's Way

message: Re Aoi "leaving guest stars section for now; however, it appears both characters are one-off characters and if no one objects, i will remove them.":I don't object. From what I'm reading "Julie Stevens" also only appeared in two episodes, and can't be called a recurring character either. --Amalthea 11:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest stars 

message: Since the list has no verifiable sources, no lead, no assertion of notability other than a  template, I suggest that this information is merged back into the main article here until such a time that a editor (or group of editors) is prepared to create a useful standalone list which has reliable sources verifying the information contained therein.  The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge back in [[List of Caitlin's Way episodes]]
Talk:List of Girlfriends episodes

message: Hopefully everyone is satisfied with the very much detailed episode list of Girlfriends.
Ceddy06 22:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Helpful List 

message: The ratings have been added for most of the seasons. Please make any necessary corrections when needed. Ceddy 06 04:31, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings! 

message: I have tagged this article with a  template tag. While many of this episode list's earlier episode synopses (especially the longer ones) look likely to have been originally written for Wikipedia, many of the later seasons' episode synopses look suspiciously like they have been copied and pasted verbatim from the episode descriptions that one might have found in something like an online television schedule guide, etc. However, I don't know the exact source of these synopses... Nonetheless, to be safe, it would be better if many of the later episode synopses were rewritten by somebody with a familiarity with these episodes. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article {{tl|Copypaste}} tagged 
Talk:Sirogojno

message: Hello, just wondering what is meant by "ethno village". 
*Ethnically diverse?
*Ethnically sparse?
*Village whose residents emphasize culture/tradition/history?
*Probably something completely different... heh 
Since there is no page on wiki for ethno village nor is it mentioned in the article Village, maybe it would be a good idea to add it somewhere, with a definition of what is meant by it (just for clarity, since I'm not quite sure what is meant by the term). :) Stop The Lies 22:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sirogojno itself is just an ordinary village, but there is a museum referred to as ethno village located in Sirogojno. It is actually a small set of old traditional wooden houses collected from all over Zlatibor and placed there so the tourists and those interested in history and ethnology can observe them. That's why this museum is called an ethno village (etno selo in Serbian). It is so-called "the museum under the open sky", and it's real name is "Old Village" Museum, Sirogojno (Serbian: Muzej "Staro selo", Sirogojno). --Djordje D. Bozovic 22:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OOoohhhh wow that makes a big difference. Thank you for your explanation. Maybe it would be a good idea to make it a bit more clear in the article itself, including in it what you just wrote? (I don't think the article explains that the ethno village is a museum. Stop The Lies 22:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

text: So I added a few things, mostly from your post. There wouldn't be a reference for any of this somewhere, would there..? Stop The Lies 00:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what kind of reference would you like? Try this, or search the Google. --Djordje D. Bozovic 22:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I already got a bunch and put them in the external links, so nvm :) Stop The Lies 22:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ethno village

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Psychonaut (talk) 19:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:This Is Why I'm Hot

message: WTG on mentioning the samples, when I heard him talk about NY I recognzed Shook Ones and it make sense, the Compton, I revognizd Nuthin But a G Thang. yeah mims for soing that, and good for who added it, good you noticed, if not I would have added it!
"* Less than 60 seconds into the song, this song contains a derogatory reference to African-Americans. Anyone speaking this word in a professional workplace would be fired for racist hate speech."
Before deleting it again, please explain your reasons for deleting this, such as if you feel this comment is untrue. 69.221.162.75 15:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not "trivia" and does not belong here. - eo 19:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samples 

message: THIS is why I'm hot Kip the Dip 08:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stupid link to another wiki
Talk:2006 Arena Football League season

message: someone check the winning percents. they are a little messed up --ROASTYTOAST 22:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Percentages
Talk:Domaine de la Romanée-Conti

message: *Support Given that the vineyard article is 50% repeating the DRC article, and the unique content applies equally to DRC, I don't think there's much point in having a separate article. My preference would be to call the combined article DRC, but wouldn't argue too much with simple Romanée Conti, as that's perhaps what the ordinary Wikipedian would use. FlagSteward 11:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Romanée Conti

message: *Support FlagSteward 11:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with La Tache

message: http://news.yahoo.com/celebrity-chef-charlie-trotter-accused-counterfeit-wine-case-000854505.html
"Domaine de la Romanee-Conti only produced small yields in 1945 and as a result did not produce any large format magnum-size bottles."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.184.252.247 (talk) 01:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  fakes ?
Talk:Formation of rocks

message: A new article on the formation of rocks has recently been created: Rock cycle in kids perspective. But Wikipedia does not usually have articles on topics "in kids perspective" - we have one article per topic. The "kids perspective" article seems to cover much of the same material as this one, plus some miscellany. If it includes any details that don't appear here (or in related articles like lithification) they should be brought into this article.  FreplySpang 02:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Kona storm

message: Suggested that the Kona low material be merged into this one.
W Nowicki (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kona low 
Talk:Dover Bronze Age Boat

message: This page could do with some information about the role of the boat, how it was different to others and so on.
I will try to add more to the page as and when I can, including information about the boat as a whole.
Phasler90 22:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Role of the boat

message: I have added info based on having seen the boat in the museum and read it.  Most info can be checked on the Museum website, but obviously proper link/refs would be better.  Needs:
*diagrams showing the museums official suggested size/format (speculations?)
* more info on material of boat
* more comparative info on other known boats, not just Yorkshire, but elsewhere
* any relevent data on what was found with the boat, giving context for the boat
* anything which tells of the boats 'life-history' and use.
* Info on the preservation materials. 
I know there is quite a lot about the above things in the museum itself, but I don't remember it well and I don't have proper refs to it.  
As I recall the museum believes it was a sea-going vessel and that was used for a number of years before being dumped in a small side channel off the main river, where it was quickly buried in silt.  I am certain that the ARE other small things found with the boat and that the materials, such as the caulking are all described in the museum.  A display in the boat gallery is dedicated to the preservation showing materials and method.
Personally, I believe that having been excavated and preserved with modern materials and knowhow, the boat is a very important specimen and that this article could become a very useful and informative one for wiki-users wanting to know about bronze-age boats.
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next steps 

message: One of the key datum for this article could be the boat's width.  The boat as displayed is not an opened-out display of both halves, it really was about six feet wide, giving it a much bigger volume than a typical canoe.
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width 
Talk:Dinner Rush

message: Anyone care enough about this movie to convert the list of characters into a discussion of the plot? No one needs to worry about spoilers at this point, since the list and descriptions are so thorough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frankenab (talk • contribs) 12:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Characters vs. Discussion of the Plot 

message: I restored some maintenance tags that had been removed without explanation.
I'm not sure they are exactly the best tags, but they represent some of the problems with this article.
* Synthesis – The statement about the film adhering to some dramatic prescription is either original to the contributor or comes from an uncited source.
* While the plot summary for a film can be written based on the content of the film without additional citation, that's not what appears here (as noted by a previous talk page commenter). The character descriptions also involve some synthesis, conveying what the writer surmised about characters perhaps based on their actions in the film.
While I agree that the press reviews and (although not precisely cited) mention in Maltin's book are sufficient to establish the likely notability of the film, at this distance in time there might possibly be something more said about it. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 17:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore maint tags
Talk:Thomaston High School

message: I added a part in the athletics section about us winning the Berkshire League title. Also, I don't really think the Middle School Wrestling part is not really necessary. Schwartzmeister
I don't think the names of the middle school wrestling team is really necessary either considering that there isn't a varsity wrestling or varsity cross country list, although I will leave that to someone else to take care of jak 22:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics section

message: I don't think the mission statement section of this article is in any way how it should be written. It's bulleted, very choppy, etc. Thoughts130 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission Statement?
Talk:Charles F. Shaw

message: I've heard rumors the wine is sold for so cheap because during a divorce settlement with his wife, the prenumptial agreement entitled her to the wine estate, and in retaliation Shaw lowered the price of the wine so the profits would be weak. Has anyone heard similar or have any clarification?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordanmaurer04 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Speaking as a Trader Joe's employee I can say this is untrue, the low price is due to the wine glut resulting from the overplanting of wine grapes in California in the 1980s. Kilonum (talk) 00:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both of you have no clue. See Bronco Wine Company, and grow up. 174.31.186.66 (talk) 04:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Myths behind Charles Shaw
Talk:Waajeed

message: Hi,
My name is Ted Hutchings and I am the assistant to Waajeed. We recently had his biography updated for his forthcoming album. I tried to change the biography on his page to the new version, however my edit has been reversed. Please help. Underground Music Academy (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request an edit
Talk:The Wine Group

message: I've cleaned up what looks like a series of COI edits, but looking at the history, this pre-COI, unsanitized version has much more relevant info about the company, though it is mostly unsourced. It's possible reverting would be the way to go, but I'm out of time for today. I also blocked the COI editor, who is welcome to come up with a non COI username. My only COI is I was drinking an "Underdog Wine Merchants" brand tonight, and found the sorry state of the article. UWM is part of TWG. Please edit responsibly. Valfontis (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up
Talk:Constellation Brands

message: This page is rather noob. It can do with some more information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.52.125 (talk) 07:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nubness 

message: please update :
NY Attorney General 2006 - illegal marketing practices pay to play settle probe 
ref : http://www.ag.ny.gov
add to prior version 
Cordovaos (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —  (e • t • c) 15:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2014 

message: This is a request to un-protect the page and allow for further updates by various editors. The data on the current front page is largely incorrect and deceptive.
CLEANINGsCREW (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2016 

message: I rolled back two edits by . At least part of it was copied from another website (the bit I checked was from https://www.bestwinesunder20.com.au/constellation-and-accolade-fancy-names-for-barbarians/). The entire addition was not wikified or referenced, and did not appear to meet WP:NPOV or WP:NOR. --Scott Davis Talk 14:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This plagiarised material has now been added three times, by ,  and . None of these users have edited any other page. --Scott Davis Talk 04:54, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  rollback 24 September 2017
Category talk:Doctors of the Church

message: Note that Sylvester I is recognized as a doctor of the church only by the Armenians. It seems to be that we need religion-specific categorizations to be rolled up into a higher level doctor of the church category. Maybe the ones everyone agrees on can be in the higher level one to start with. Student7 (talk) 00:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sylvester I
Talk:Judicial assistance

message: Hey, I didn't see any article focusing on judicial assitance so I went for it.  I can't really fill it out right now because I'm in class.  Please help at will. EECavazos 23:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Partners of Finnair Plus

message: As many partners pages for frequent flyer programs have been merged already, I see no reason why we shouldn't merge this into the Finnair page.  All we have to merge is the airline and car rental partners.  Adding hotels, credit cards, or any other partnerships might use too much room on the page.  This merge is very simple and can be done within seconds.--Golich17 23:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging to Finnair
Talk:Earl of Surrey

message: I see some errors on the list, but I don't know where to look to find the proper information. Let's hope someone here does!
134.29.59.217 23:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The List

message: If you wanted to look up for who's who in the Earls of Surrey, go to FMG website and use its search engine. I included the link for the First Creation of the Earls of Surrey. Sundehul  —Preceding comment was added at 03:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Foundation for Medieval Genealogy

message: ODNB's article on the 2nd Duke suggests that in 1514 his son did not merely take on the courtesy title of "Earl of Surrey" (the institution of courtesy titles at that point being, at any rate, not very well-developed) but rather was himself created Earl of Surrey.  So is that a separate creation in 1514, which has been held alongside the original 1483 creation since 1524?  john k (talk) 06:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cracroft's Peerage suggests the 1514 creation was for life only. Opera hat (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd Duke of Norfolk 

message: I notice the list of Warenne earls has been re-numbered, without any discussion that I can see. 
There is no source for the present arrangement; the only source on the page supports the previous arrangement, not this one.  
I presume the problem is with Isabelle Warenne having two husbands ( and outliving both); her page says she was countess in her own right, while William’s and Hamelin’s pages say they were earl in right of their wife. 
So William the son was either sixth earl after his father, or he was fifth earl inheriting from his mother; correct?  
But whichever it is, or whichever we go for, some sources would be nice; and if there are two different numbering schemes shouldn’t we have an explanation in the text? Swanny18 (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Franklin Grove Township, Lee County, Illinois

message: man, when is this show finally coming out? feels like forever.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.212.36 (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

message: See page 6 . There is a reference to an earlier resolution renaming China township to Franklin Grove township effective April 2003. GNIS confirms that the primary name is "Franklin Grove" and "China" is a variant name.
:I did find the reference in the PDF, but it was on page 13.  Although that statement seems clear, the Lee County website at http://www.countyoflee.org/ has a map which still shows the township as "China", not "Franklin Grove", though there is a town in the township called "Franklin Grove".  This seems to call for more research, and I'm checking to see what else I can find out. Omnedon (talk) 20:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The site does mention "Franklin Grove Township" in some documents (like this one), so it looks like the map was just never updated. GNIS also shows Franklin Grove as the primary name with China Grove as a "variant name", as was stated above.  The Census Factfinder still uses "China Township", but that's from 2000 and the change seems to have happened in 2003. Omnedon (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2010 census lists this township as Franklin Grove Township. It used to be China Township, not China Grove Township. That sounds too much like Doobie Brothers to me. Backspace (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  renamed 
Talk:Valuation Office Agency

message: I'd like to move this page to Valuation Office Agency. Valuation Office is the old (pre 1991) name for what is now the Valuation Office Agency - see www.voa.gov.uk for confirmation. I'll wait a little while in case of objections (not that I can see any, but I'm new to this malarky.) Winklethorpe 23:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request
Talk:Capodimonte porcelain

message: Hi all,
I see the text has been trnasfered from the porcelain article. I agree that it is best as a sepearte article. Can I ask the original author, or others, to:
*Provided supporting citations
*Explain why Capodimonte Porcelain is a "specific technique." Personally I'm not convinced of the latter, not that that is necessary for inclusion in the article :-)
ThanxTheriac 23:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not eliminate your internal link. It is still there Theriac 20:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Folks, the following description is not unique to Capodimonte, but describes porcelain techniques in general: a particular way of working and decorating the porcelain by hand to create figures and above all cups of flowers. This process of moulding porcelain to create the object is followed by a first firing at 1250 degrees Celsius, then the object is decorated by hand and fired again at 750 degrees Celsius to fix the colours. --Wetman 07:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I've removed the conflict-of-interest tag; I don't see any conflict of interest present here.  The person who added the tag alluded to a contributor having a commercial interest in the subject, but I don't see any evidence of that, nor was it discussed here. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it wasn't so much COI as perhaps coatracking or maybe just misguided overzealotry; I've eliminated a large swath of text about porcelain in general that has nothing to do with Capodimonte porcelain, but rather refers to porcelain in general.  Perhaps it could be integrated with the Porcelain article, were anyone so inclined, but given that it's unreferenced, I doubt it's worth the effort. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 

message: The "History" section of this article bears a close resemblance to the text at this antiques sales site.  I can't determine if the antique site is older or newer than the text in our article.  For now, I'm leaving the text in, but I will ask the copyright experts to have a look and see if it needs to be adjusted.  In the meantime, I will not copy-edit that section of the article to avoid confusing the issue further. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation? 

message: I see other wikipedia entries with more substance that are labelled stumps. Why not this one?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.109.37 (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a stump?