lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ellen Fanning

message: It seems that after Ellen Fanning made a story about Wikipedia many people have attacked her on her website. I have semi protected this page. Harrison Bass - HB4026 01:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, just adding the template doesn't do anything.  Only an admin can protect an article.  In fact, adding the template to an unprotected article is actually a bad thing - an admin may see it and mistakenly believe that it is already protected.  I have, however, s-protected it so now it is protected.  To any other admin, if you feel it should be unprotected as a page likely to be hit by first time visitors (you can edit this page right now!), please feel free to do so. --BigDT 01:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Appreciated. At the end of the interview I searched on Wikipedia to see if her alleged "the sister of the singer Fanning" appears on her page. I was surprised to see someone had posted an emotionally charged edit. Glad its removed. FunAdventure 02:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, I did too... :P It's good to see that when these things are happened upon, they're changed, but it's also a bad thing, as people come and vandalise the article too... Pretty surprising, too, I normally don't watch Sunday... User:Ss112 03:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalisim Central

message: Fanning used to a heavy smoker, smoking for twenty years as evidenced by her teeth. She has cut down to one cigarette before bed.
:You have been adding a claim about this person being a smoker .  I have no earthly idea if she is or was ... but under WP:BLP, this kind of thing cannot be added unless it is (1) sourced and (2) not giving undue weight to a minor episode in this woman's life.  (In other words, it isn't significant that some guy smokes unless they campaign against smoking or something.  It would be like mentioning that George W Bush likes steak.  So what?) --BigDT 01:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, BigDT, although I think someone simply vandalised the page, trying to make a joke, albeit, a lame one. User:Ss112 03:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Smoker

message: Mention removed. 10:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? I don't see any reason it shouldn't be mentioned. Either give a good reason or it goes back up. Rothery 05:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Wikipedia" reference 

message: We should teach young children how to meditate which is teaching them to know themselves. I personally believe it would make them better humans 49.195.119.144 (talk) 07:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:TEN (TV station)

message: Can anyone confirm that TEN actually used the third logo? I always thought they just coloured the spikes to colourise the logo. And I don't think there was a yellow circle on the last one. --Whitehornmatt 06:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a more accurate logo, and I have cleaned this article a bit. Stickeylabel 06:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logos 

message: It actually stands for The Entertainment Network. Snuggleblanket (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um.
Talk:Talatama

message: Is there any use to specify categories?: Year of birth unknown | Year of death unknown | Place of birth unknown
It seems to me pedantic. In addition even if the place is not sure, it is very likely to be Tongatapu. --Tauʻolunga 07:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: unknown

message: Since the story of Tamatou is fully included in this article, I've made it a redirect. It's not a fully satisfactory solution, but the alternative would be to duplicate the content, or to move content from the Talatama article to the Tamatou one. Any thoughts? Aridd (talk) 13:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The redirect makes it very difficult to use the navigation to move from one king to the next. When you click Tamatou to go to the next King, it redirects here and you can't go any further unless you somehow know who the next King is and you type it into the search bar. 12.116.29.106 (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tamatou
Talk:Limca

message: This article states that the Indian Government owned and manufactured the soft drink brands, Thums Up, Limca, etc. However, this is incorrect information. Limca, Thums Up, Gold Spot and Citra were all brands owned by Parle (a major Indian Conglomerate) who later sold it to Coca Cola at a very big profit.
----Zan
A bottle of Limca I just got in California has a pasted-on nutrition label that says "Ingredients: Carbonated water, sugar, food color, caramel e-150". That's it. So why does it taste lime-y/ginger-y? According to the label there's no flavoring at all besides sugar. Oh wait, it also says 300ml on the label, but 200ml on the actual bottle. Weird.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.239.45.4 (talk) 19:24, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Leprechaun in the Hood

message: Removed "black comedy" horror as a description to this movie. This movie is not a black comedy genre. Nor does it have anything to do with ethnicity so the removal is based on accuracy and clarity. 21:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: why are you mentioning ethnicity?  Black comedy is a form of comedy that has dark themes.  It has nothing to do with African Americans.  I don't think you understand what a black comedy is. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

text: Read my full comment. Because this movie is not in the genre of a black comedy. It's comedy horror. I added the part about ethnicity in case there was also confusion. Removing the word "black" brings full clarity.  SweatyFeet (talk) 01:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Most horror comedy films are black comedies, but since it's not sourced, it's probably not worth arguing about.  I still don't think you understand what the term means, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Comedy 

message: * "Leprechaun: In the Hood" with colon would likely mean "episode "In the Hood" of a series called "Leprechaun"". 
**This link says "When three rappers want to get even with a pimp, they accidentally unleash a leprechaun who goes on a killing rampage in the 'hood.": the apostrophe seems to show that here, "'hood" is short for "neighborhood" and does not mean "head-cover". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Remarks
Talk:Special Task Force (Sri Lanka)

message: STF has Pindad Komodo Armed Car.not Anoa APC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randeepa (talk • contribs) 17:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  About  APC 
Talk:Mullewa, Western Australia

message: Would the iron ore be hauled by road train?    Tabletop (talk) 09:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  by Road Train? 
Talk:Abderhalden–Kaufmann–Lignac syndrome

message: This article should be merged into cystinosis. "Abderhalden-Kaufmann-Lignac" is a deprecated eponym for cystinosis. PubMed has a single mention of Abderhalden-Kaufmann-Lignac syndrome, a 1987 case report written in Russian (PMID: 3606421). "Abderhalden-Kaufmann-Lignac" is not found in OMIM. The archived NIH page linked to (https://web.archive.org/web/20180515112643/https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/10074/abderhalden-kaufmann-lignac-syndrome) in the article just has a title, but not informational content. Jaredroach (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: This article states "Emil Abderhalden (1877-1950), a Swiss scientist, described cystinosis as familial cystine accumulation disease in 1903. Eduard Kaufmann (1860-1931) first met a child named Abderhalden in Basel, Switzerland. During the postmortem investigation, it was found that the patient had substantial cystine accumulation in several organs at the age of 21 months. The disease was first clearly and systematically described in 1924 by the Dutch pathologist George Lignac (1891–1954), who was also the first to link cystinosis to its main clinical signs, including growth retardation, renal failure, and rickets. For this reason, the original name for cystinosis was Abderhalden-Kaufmann-Lignac syndrome." implying that Abderhalden-Kaufmann-Lignac syndrome is a historical term. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 04:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I think this is an obvious Type 1 merge that does not need further discussion. WP:MERGE Jaredroach (talk) 20:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[cystinosis]]
Talk:Murchison (Western Australia)

message: I raised this mainly because both leads say that the article refers to the IBRA region. There is further confusion of terms (biogeographic vs bioregion vs ecozone, in those articles), but I'm not going there. I'm hoping that some WA editors can decide what to do about these two - either distinguish them in the leads, or merge. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 21:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Gilgandra, New South Wales

message: The lead and info box said "The population (as of 2010) in Gilgandra is around 6,900 people". Yet the refence was the 2006 census which gives a much lower figure. "In the 2006 Census (held on 8th August 2006), there were 2,679 persons usually resident in Gilgandra (Urban Centre Localities)" This was suspect as there hasn't been a 2010 census! Latest figures available are 2006! (see ref in article). I have therefore reverted and edited to remove these perhaps good faith but unreferenced changes. Also returned the piccy to the infobox, missing since ≈03:54, 12 July 2010!  There is a lot of unreferenced text, likely wp:original research in this article- 220.101 talk\Contribs 10:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population data 
Talk:DNA repair-deficiency disorder

message: Bernstein0275 (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

message: Progeria is listed as a DNA repair deficiency condition yet the page for progeria implicitly contradicts this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.232.186 (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: DNA Repair Deficiency & Progeria
Talk:Great Northern Highway

message: Has the prose of a B-grade but no references. Orderinchaos78 02:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: C-grade it is, then. TRS-80 (talk) 18:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The History section states (twice) that sealing of the Great Northern Highway marked the completion of sealing the entire national Highway 1 route.  However the Highway 1 page states that large sections are still unsealed, specifically mentioning Queensland.  --Gth-au (talk) 22:33, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a strange one. It did complete it, then they moved Highway 1. Specifically, it used to come along the Barkly Highway through Mt Isa and Cloncurry whereas now it takes a route much closer to the Gulf of Carpentaria. Orderinchaos 23:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sealed?

message: The lead section includes "Perth–Darwin National Highway", but the rest of the article has "Perth Darwin" without the dash. It should probably be the same throughout. Mitch Ames (talk) 06:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: , dash removed from lead. - Evad37 [talk] 02:45, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perth–Darwin 

message: I'm copying the yet to be resolved comments from the ACR here as a worklist, so it's easy to find and I don't forget about them. - Evad37 [talk] 00:40, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you take another look when you get the chance? Cheers, - Evad37 [talk] 10:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't have any issues except for the one noted above. --Rschen7754 17:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unresolved A-Class Review comments 

message: This will be of interest and additional information regarding the development of GNH  the article discusses the construction of a new road between Paynes Find and Mount Magnet. Gnangarra 05:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  new source
Talk:Jim Baxter

message: Hi anon, I reverted from 3-2 "defeat" (or whatever it was) to 3-2 "hammering". It is a reference to a (humourous) comment by Bobby Brown, that no team ever took such a hammering in a 3-2 defeat. 
Cheers Neil Leslie 08:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed 'hammering' to 'defeat' Cjam74 14:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hammering" 

message: Do Baxter's 34 international games really merit roughly double the coverage of his club career? Seems imbalanced to me. --Jameboy (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is imbalanced, yes. If that's because the sources focus on his international career, then we need some new sources. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 20:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Until you find and cite them, that's just your opinion, and inadmissible. --Philcha (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Imbalance?
Talk:Taronga Western Plains Zoo

message: Should it be moved to "Taronga Western Plains Zoo"? Frickeg (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taronga in name 
Talk:WFCR

message: I always believe that when only a few additional words would significantly clarify an article, then the writer really, really should add those words instead of forcing every reader who seeks clarity to click on a link, or read the references, or google, in order to understand the answers to the most basic questions that are bound to arise.
In the first sentence: Almost nobody understands a technical phrase like "licensed to Amherst, Massachusetts" — which does not mean licensed to that city, but instead means licensed to serve that city.
At the end of the introductory section it is mentioned that "WFCR announced that it would consolidate operations with WGBH-owned PBS station WGBY-TV". Nobody knows what it even means for a radio station to consolidate operations with a TV station. It is also unmentioned what it means in this particular case. It turns out that it means that WGBY-TV (Springfield, Massachusetts) and WFCR will share their coverage of local news. How hard is it to just say that, instead of making a reader click on the reference to answer this obvious question?50.205.142.35 (talk) 06:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not well written.
Wikipedia talk:Notability/Historical/Arguments

message: I think Notability should be official policy, but the standard for notability should be a lot lower then it seems to be now.  I believe the burden of proof should be on the article to prove that the subject is notable, but on the deleter to prove it's not.  I've seen too many good articles quickly deleted because the deleter assumed something was not notable just because they hadn't heard of it.
The current standards are hard on newbies, who by nature throw up an article, but don't in that article presented a strong argument for notability.  Mathiastck 17:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability should be weakened 

message: I don't really understand the motivation for strict notability criteria. Could someone point me to a more basic argument in favor of restricting the number of articles (at all)?
I don't see how (verified and well written) articles about the obscure and the uninteresting harms Wikipedia in any way: it doesn't make things harder to find, it doesn't cost money (to write), it doesn't waste anyone's time (who didn't want to waste it anyway) and, if one hasn't heard of a subject, then one will never know the article is there.
It seems to me that "breadth of subject matter" is potentially Wikipedia's greatest strength. It can cover more subjects than any encyclopedia in history by several orders of magnitude. That's a good thing. Isn't it?
I believe very strongly in verification and sources, and I would like to see people be more aggressive with  tags. I can see that you should delete an article if you doubt that it's true. But why delete something because it's uninteresting? CharlesGillingham 04:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Charles. See also Wikipedia:Non-notability/Essay -- BenBildstein 04:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability should not be a criteria for deletion 

message: It is too easy for someone to delete an article for personal or factional reasons, and for them to claim it is 'non-notable' - also a person who knows about and is involved in one small subject area can charge around deleting articles outside their field of expertise. Freedom to delete is the opposite of freedom of speech.
Andy Ford 17:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently arguing for a change in this area. See Wikipedia_talk:Deletion_policy#Deleting_non-notable_content. -- BenBildstein 01:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notability is being abused
Talk:Blockhouse

message: What is the difference between a blochouse and a stockade? FloridaArmy (talk) 13:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Stockade]]
Talk:Final Destination

message: Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Boilerplate "compared to high grossing horror franchises" jnestorius(talk) 11:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boilerplate "compared to high grossing horror franchises" 

message: I've a problem with the description of the film as being about "Death personified" as there is no person, there is no skeletal figure with a scythe, no angel of death. It is death in the abstract, an "invisible antagonist", a force of nature. 
It might be more accurate to say it is the manifestation of death, like a strong wind we clearly see the consequences without seeing the wind itself. The article needs better more careful phrasing. -- 37.110.218.43 (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death personified 

message: WP:FILMRATINGS says not to include film ratings. For some reason this article ignores the guidelines and includes a table of ratings anyway. There does not appear to be anything notable (or even interesting) about the ratings. 
Why does this article includes a ratings table? -- 109.77.214.141 (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the table. I can only guess that someone added it in good faith unaware of WP:FILMRATINGS, but still it should at least have been properly referenced WP:V. If someone really wants to add it back they should find references to show the ratings were notable WP:N. -- 109.78.202.222 (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings
Talk:Barry McGuigan World Championship Boxing

message: The article has it slightly wrong: This was originally Star Rank Boxing, but had the Barry McGuigan license attached for the UK market. The title screen of the UK version was modified to display the "Barry McGuigan World Championship Boxing" title, but the following screen still displays the original "Star Rank Boxing" title (it seems Activision either missed this or simply didn't bother to change it). Therefore, the title of this article should be "Star Rank Boxing" and the lede amended to state that this game is also known as "Barry McGuigan World Championship Boxing" (or something to that effect). 86.156.176.249 (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:TenDRA Compiler

message: To whoever is maintaining this article;
In August 2003 TenDRA was forked when ten15.org was created after the primary developer of tendra.org took full control again of TenDRA development due to personal difficulties with one other team member.
This is information that's important to the history of TenDRA, that's been removed. I didn't write it, though I know the author took great care to be as neutral; this definatley needs to go back in to the article, in some form.
Most importantly, it needs to convey:
* Why the split occured (without going into personal details)
* Who was involved
* That tendra.org is run by the guy who started the opensource work back in 2002.
It might also be mentioned that the goals listed originated on tendra.org.
Hope that helps,
--217.22.89.209 09:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I notice that neither ten15.org nor tendra.org websites seem to be working. Are both of these projects abandoned? 90.193.87.6 (talk) 11:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually tendra.org has active development (which you can see by following its svn repository), but the website is not currently online. It'll come back eventually. Probably the documentation and manpages before the rest of the content. --Kate (talk) 22:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sites Down
Talk:Kif Gets Knocked Up a Notch

message: This isn't correct. In the episode Friday's Child (TOS episode), the woman (Eleen) is already pregnant by her husband (Akaar). McCoy delivers the child, but never impregnates the woman. I'll delete this portion. Woo tangent 09:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *When Kif goes into an early stage of labor, he calls it "The Quickening", most probably a reference to the movie Highlander II: The Quickening.
-- This is incorrect. "Quickening" is an actual event in labor, where the mother feels the fetus move. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sandtiger (talk • contribs) 17:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I removed this line from the cultural references 

message: While Leela is proven to be the "donor" of the genetic material, Amy also touches Kif mere seconds before Leela. It seems highly unlikely that she would not be the "donor" of Kif's children, because Amy touched Kif before Leela. I wasn't exactly sure where to put this, so if it is deleted, I don't mind.Omnechist (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not inaccurate at all.  It is even explained.  During Kif's "stage", every time he touches someone there is a chance that they will be the donor.  It is not required to be first, it's required to be the first touch that actually gives the genetic material. --Svippong 23:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both of them were the donors. Some of them were cyclopes (Leela's), and others were klutzes (Amy's). I don't want to get in an edit war over Futurama, so I'll leave this on the talk page.--VAcharon (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  inaccuracy