Talk:Great Commission church movement/Archive 4

message: Good sources.  None of them mention the subject of this article however.  Since the Christianity Today article focuses specifically on New Life Christian Fellowship, recommend using the material to create an article there, and mention of that one particular church body as notable within the barren Great Commission Ministries section, and as the chief and most notable body if we find other notable GCM churches.  Entry would read something like this:
*Most notable of the GCM campus ministries is New Life Christian Fellowship, whose pastors Jim Pace, Matt Rogers, and Chris Backert were sought out by national media in the wake of the Virginia Tech massacre, which claimed the lives of two NCLF members and ten others connected to the ministry.  (then cite all sources, or at least five starting with Christianity Today and CNN, and including at least one for Rogers and Backert).
All the material is notable, immediately verifiable (make sure to save the Wash Post article--the archive is a subscription service), and the summary of the information is well written and NPoV for the purposes of WikiProject:Christianity (some Confucian may disagree with me?).  But again, no mention of Great Commission Ministries is made in any of the articles so the inclusion in this article should be limited to the particular GCM church and what it is notable for.  I'd make all the changes myself, but I'd like to give Gatorgalen an opportunity to create his first new article and receive the credit for a job well done.  ClaudeReigns 05:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Virginia Tech massacre]]

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
*As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]
*This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
*There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
**allege
**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?] 
*Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: recognize (A) (British: recognise), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), program  (A) (British: programme), programme (B) (American: program ).
*Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): shouldn't.
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed wikidates, slashed suggestion above.  Not 100% sure that I did it right, open to suggestion.  Nswinton\talk 21:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automated Peer Review 

message: May I ask for the reason for using bold text for the previous names of the association in the History section? I didn't think you were supposed to use bold (for titles) except in introduction. Overusing bold is very hard on the eyes. Not even NLP ads would use it that much. -- trlkly 11:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bold