lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brooklyn Law School

message: An editor deleted a paragraph of the lede that had in summary form some of the more relevant data about the school. Saying it should be in the text. But the lede is supposed to reflect the most important information (which of course may include data) from the text. It should be restored, not deleted because of one editor's unsubstantiated pov. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brooklyn_Law_School&diff=867714296&oldid=867642168 199.102.168.8 (talk) 01:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: An unregistered editor insists that the lede should contain these sentences: "For the 2018-2019 academic year, Professor Maryellen Fullerton assumed the role of Interim Dean at the law school, replacing Nicholas W. Allard, who stepped down in July 2018 after six years at the school's helm. Michael T. Cahill, co-Dean at Rutgers Law School, will take over as Brooklyn Law School’s next President and Dean starting in July 2019."  I disagree.  First, the information is unsourced; it would be ok if the information were discussed in the body of the article, with a source, and mentioned again in the lede but that's not the case.  Second, the lede should be a summary of what is in the body of the article and this information isn't mentioned in the body.  Third, it's information that simply isn't necessary in the lede; this isn't critical information that readers have to know about to understand this subject. ElKevbo (talk) 13:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interim dean and new dean in lede
Talk:Van Tuong Nguyen/to do

message: * Pleas for Clemency from UN and their response
* Pleas for Clemency from the Pope and their response
* Proposal by some Australian politicians for economic sanctions
* Coverage of the issue by Singapore media
* Dissent in Australian parliament about pleas for clemency
* Dissent in Queensland parliament following minute of silence
* The firm resolve of the Singapore Parliament to make an example of this case as a warning to othersSoftgrow 05:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Beheading video

message: In recently viral of Justin Mohn's video did not showing the process of "beheading"/live murder – only the already-beheaded head – thus shouldn't included in this page(?).I didn't removed it yet, cause I'm still hesitant where to put it. Or maybe, we should change the definition of 'live murder' to something else thus we could put it in here. EdhyRa (talk) 02:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded the 'definition' at the top. We aren't that discriminating in this matter; the first modern entry cited was not a video of Mr. Pearl being beheaded, because the "videographer" failed to turn the camera on - so they instead shot video of the head after the act took place. It's all more than gruesome enough to be folded into the topic, sadly.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 04:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

text: For starters, this appears to be a big enough story to warrant its own article. but until then, it would be helpful to mention that Justin Mohn was far right and a trump supporter. Not sure why it would be left out. 46.97.170.34 (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a 'big story', nor is the claim that he was "far right and a trump supporter" specifically relevant to his deranged crime, unless you find a source that suggests those characteristics were specifically related to decapitating his father. Just being a 'trump supporter' isn't a crime, last I checked. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 22:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justin Mohn's video is not a beheading video 

message: It was confirmed by the white house, major news agencies that there exists no evidence that hamas fighters committed beheading on the day or later, in the beginning of news coverage, such false news were popularized by Israeli media, it was declared aswell by the American president on press conference. these news were later found to be false. Maen.khaled (talk) 09:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamas 10-7 beheading was false news
Talk:Johann Bernhard Basedow

message: "It contains a complete system of primary education, intended to develop the intelligence of the pupils and to bring them, so far as possible, into contact with realities, not with mere words."
Can intelligence be developed? Some say that we are "born with IQ" and that nothing can make you smarter. Can education increase human intelligence? Elabro 15:25, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tip Snooke

message: >> Four years later against England at Capetown, he dismissed two batsmen - Wilfred Rhodes and David Denton - in the very first over of a Test match, a feat that was not repeated until nearly ninety years later.
The next one was Srinath against Australia (Slater and Blewett) at Calcutta in 1997/8. Srinath did it again v NZ at Hamilton in 1999/00. It has been achieved once more since (Tuffey, iirc) Tintin 15:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:One- and two-tailed tests

message: Problem:  if you type in "one-tailed" it just says there is no such page.  It would not make sense to create a separate page to define "one-tailed";  both one-tailed and two-tailed are more appropriately discussed on the same page.  But, it wouldn't work very well to redirect "one-tailed" to this page, because someone might get confused and think "one-tailed" means the same thing as "two-tailed".  I suggest renaming this page to "One-tailed and two-tailed tests" and putting redirects so anyone typing in "two-tailed", "two-tailed test", "two tailed test", "one-tailed", etc. etc. will find this page.  What do others think --  is it OK if I rename it?  --Coppertwig 12:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree --Jdedmond 12:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Fgnievinski (talk) 19:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming this page 

message: I'm new to this site. but  have a question. 
I have to complete a Ttest and do not know how to determine if it is one tailed or two tailed and the type. Can anyone help me?
Robyn7 (talk) 04:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps my comment above can help. Alhead (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On tailed and two tailed Ttest 

message: This example is very confusing to me. Could someone tell me, what the p-value would be in the one-tailed and the two-tailed cases, respectively, if my sample was TTTTT? Timur lenk (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coin flipping example
Talk:FC BATE Borisov

message: Correct is FC BATE!!! See team official site and team profile on UEFA site! Huge Dude 08:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FC BATA???? 

message: Wait, it says that they were the first belarusian team to qualify for the group stages of the Champions League, surely Dynamo minsk have done this before?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.212.144 (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Champions League

message: Someone should add the profile for Pavel Nekhaychik! He's playing as a regular in the Champions League, with a veru good performance vs. Juventus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.97.102.198 (talk) 02:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player profile 

message: I'm watching the Champions League game of BATE Borisov against Barça and the on-screen graphics for BATE Borisov have two stars above their crest. The club crest on this page has just one star. Someone with more background on this team may want to reconcile that. --RossO (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 stars is wright version https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ru/d/dc/EmblemFCBATE.png --37.215.161.48 (talk) 22:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two stars? 
Talk:Braintree High School

message: You don't own this website Coren!!!
How do you know I wasn't beaten?
citation 4 certainly DOES exist, to whoever said it doesn't
Obama. Barack Obama.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokelego999 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

message: Articles may not be in the first person (neutral point of view). Learn the rules. --JmalcolmG 00:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Rules 

message: The article reads like an advertisement. I removed a passage for that reason, and may remove more. Also, how about some references. There are rules, people! --JmalcolmG 00:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement: 

message: I get it if Wikipedia "is not a directory" and should therefore not have every activity offered at BHS listed. But using that logic, why should the Athletics section have an entire paragraph that names the fields, gymnasiums, and stadiums at BHS? If those are included, I think it is reasonable to include a short list of activities that are offered.
98.110.178.90 (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wikipedia is not a directory" 
Talk:Lord William Bentinck

message: ::: is this Bentink not that famous stalwart of the East Indies company who rejoiced ‘the bones of the cotton weavers were bleaching the	plains	of India". Has any of the authors of the article read anything on the oh so terrific contribution of Bewntink to the distruction of India????? This laudatory article is ridiculous.
::: is there any possibility to announce this article as a contribution to a colonial, racist discussion that one believed long ended? It is unbelievable.... 
 89.43.195.18 (talk) 22:29, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: All the comments are sourced see no issue for the tag.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
File talk:Central-europe.png

message: I am sorry, but how can Slovenia possibly be considered an Adriatic country instead of an Alpine country? Sure it's a mix of both, but please, less than 20% of the territory belongs to the Mediterranean, while over 50% of the territory is considered Alpine or pre-Alpine. edolen1 16:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Slovenia an Adriatic country?

message: France and Italy are generally also considered to be alpine countries. see Alps.  Thehardwareman T C E 01:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but not of Central Europe. edolen1 14:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: oops, my bad - too mutch caffeine and not enough sleep 8-)  Thehardwareman T C E 02:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alpine countries?
Talk:Emblem

message: :An emblem crystallizes in concrete, visual terms some abstraction ...
Is a national anthem an emblem?
Paul Murray (talk)
I would say not, based on the etymology of the word, but English is a living language.
--James Chenery (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual 

message: Is a registered trademark an emblem?
You know - another characteristic of emblems its that they are published. Oh, and they are intended to be distinct from other emblems of the same type. In fact, each emblem belongs to some sort of set of related emblems, which is well known and understood by people who are interested in the subject matter. The whole point of having a flag is that people know about flags in general. ... hmm. But that doesn't really apply to police badges, unless "worn insignia" is a class.
Perhaps link to the Royal College of Heraldry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Murray (talk • contribs) 04:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:M2-9

message: I've re-ordered the introductory paragraph slightly such that it's now two shorter paragraphs. The first deals with its naming, the second with its discovery and imaging. I'll probably merge Wings of a Butterfly Nebula here shortly, since there's no talk thusfar, and it seems like a fairly uncontroversial move. Though I'm still unsure of the namespace though. looking through NASA's ADS system, it seems as though M2-9 is alternately referred to as a Protoplanetary nebula and as a Planetary nebula. This seems like it could be comes a point oif contention. Anyone know definitively which category this nebula falls under? Or is tehre even general consensus in the scientific community as to what defines one versus the other and/or where M2-9 stands as far as categorization? Seems confusing when different articles refer to it differently. Regardless, I'll merge Wings of a Butterfly Nebula here shortly, and namespace issues can be worked out later. Mgmirkin 01:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited the merged sections from the old Wings of a Butterfly Nebula article. So, hopefully things flow better now. It starts out with naming, then discovery and imaging. What scientists imagine is at the center of the nebula and how the lobes are formed. I'd appreciate someone tracking down a few articles that either support or don't support the items with { { fact } } tags. Not necessarily looking to remove them, just satisfy notability for the statements (I find them controversial, personally, as I think a lot of mainstream science has it wrong on what these are, but if someone can find citations that someone thinks these statements are right/notable, I'm happy to leave them in). Mgmirkin 02:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Edited out reference to NGC 4567, since that is referring to the Butterfly Galaxies not to any of the nebulas referred to as Butterfly Nebula. Created a disambiguation page for Butterfly Nebula (disambiguation) to help ease confusion. I've made it so that Butterfly Nebula redirects here, but have included a { {Redirect | Butterfly Nebula } } tag so that there's a link to the disambiguation page in case someone was looking for one of the "Butterfly Nebulas"... Mgmirkin 03:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor cleanup...

message: I'm puzzled by the name M2-9.  It looks like a mislabeled Messier object at first.  It doesn't seem that Minkowski discovered a whole lot of objects, such that they would need a two-level naming scheme.  The numbers are single digits, and don't seem to label the RA Dec or that sort of thing, though I haven't checked in other coordinate systems.   So what's up?  ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This SIMBAD dictionary entry shows PN M 2-NN covers a set of 56 nebulae listed in Minkowski's 1947 letter. -84user (talk) 09:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do the numbers in the name M2-9 refer to?
Talk:Jon Barwise

message: The link "He taught us how to die" is not working. --Tillmo 21:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link

message: My copy lists "Jon Barwise" (not K.J.) as the sole editor although Keisler has a chapter, co-edited the Model Theory part, and is a series editor. Some sites list Keisler as an Editor but this is false at least of the 1978 printing. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Handbook of Mathematical Logic
Talk:Impi

message: One part of the article states that the soldiers were trained to cover 50 miles in one day.  Further down, the article states that this is untrue, and they could probably cover around 25.  Which is it? Marksman45 10:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  50 miles in a day 

message: I normally would have removed bits like the part about appearing in Civilization, but the song use seemed too non-trivial to just discard. So I renamed the section to 'legacy' but added an unreferenced tag to the section. It will need some work to demonstrate the direct connection with the Zulu warriors rather than just 'there's a popular song with the name Impi'. Recognizance (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia salvaged as legacy 

message: The lead of the article gives multiple definitions of impi which could be confusing for readers and could be made redundant by adding the definitions to it's disambiguation page(Impi (disambiguation)) or by adding a section in the article on the multiple meanings of the word instead. Originalcola (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article lead
Talk:The Club (1980 film)

message: What is NSW HSC syllabus (Powerplay) ? Rmhermen 16:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would you merge this? The film and play are completely different, with the film being much more significant :? Rogerthat Talk 11:02, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not completely different - they've got the same plot, although the film has some scenes outside The Club's halls.  Just to look for consistency, one of David Williamson's other plays - Don's Party - is only covered in its film version, and the same merge discussion is now going on at the Emerald City (play) and Emerald City (film) pages.  I'd say merge to The Club (play), with a subsection for film-specific information.  - Malkinann 02:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've gone ahead and done the merge.  I think I managed to fit everything in ok. - Malkinann 09:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The disamig page for The Club lists this article separately as The Club (play) and The Club (film), and also lists another film of the same title from 1994.  Wonder if this article should be renamed as "The Club (play and 1980 film)" or "The Club (Australian play and film)" or similar to reflect that it covers both merged topics, and also to avoid confusion once someone creates an article for the 1994 film.  Suggestions?  Sroc 14:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to (1980 film) 

message: *Start class - Needs formatting to conform with Wikipedia:WikiProject_Theatre/Article_Structure guidelines.  Needs Productions, Reception, and Analysis headings per available information.
*Low importance - a single play constitutes a "highly specific area of knowledge"
--Dereksmootz (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Theatre Assessment
Talk:Battle of Gingindlovu

message: As it stands (Dec 1, 2005), this account is written entirely from the perspective of the British. While scarcity of sources makes it a little difficult to write this from a neutral point of view, it seems rather necessary to warn the reader about the perspective taken; hence the sentence added in the first paragraph. Szessi 16:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Why does Gingindlovu redirect here? Gingindlovu is the name of a town where I think the battle took place. Bezuidenhout (talk) 15:09, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gingindlovu 

message: I've noticed that some of the descriptions of the battle do not match any of the listed sources, so I've begun to correct and enhance the article using a detailed source, Ian Knight and Ian Castle's 1994 book Fearful Hard Times: The Siege and Relief of Eshowe, 1879. I will continue to do so, but I welcome the feedback of others. TH1980 (talk) 23:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the work, I have Rothwell, J. S. (1989) [1881]. Narrative of the Field Operations connected with the Zulu War of 1879 Prepared in the Intelligence Branch of the War Office (facs. repr. Lionel Leventhal, London ed.). London: War Office. ISBN 1-85367-041-3 and Lock, R. (1995). Blood on the Painted Mountain: Zulu Victory and Defeat, Hlobane and Kambula, 1879. London: Greenhill Books. ISBN 1-85367-201-7 with which I've been doing a desultory citation addition to the Zulu War articles but not much more. If you want to improve the articles please do, I'll help where I can. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks, Keith. I'll also be mindful of my comma usage! :-) TH1980 (talk) 03:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting The Article
Talk:December

message: Are any of these legitimate?  They're all red links and the only google hits are from Wikipedia mirror sites:
* Abaswanô (December 9)
* Avonej (December 15)
* Jajakna (December 24)
Jim Douglas 08:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted from Events in December 

message: Any idea why this is here? Everything seems to be either self-evident or public domain, more or less. If no justification appears soon, I will delete the tag. --Mashford 15:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references? 

message: There was a list of multimedia terms on the page that I reverted because they seemed to have no bearing on the subject of "december" 67.69.148.174 13:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multimedia Terms 

message: Could we get translations on the foreign names for december? These listings are pointless without a translation. At least a transliteration of Georgian is in order.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.27.154 (talk) 04:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign language december's 

message: shouldnt theyre unity date december 2nd be added here? yes? no? maybe?--PhantomLord581 14:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  united arab emirates 

message: That's a long list of birthstones for December. As far as I know only blue topaz and turquoise are legitimate. At least they are all I found citations for. See . Can someone find citations for the others or can we remove them?
--Kisholi (talk) 16:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthstones

message: On the "Months and days of the year" chart at the bottom of the page, as of this typing, it's claiming today is February 24, which is three days ago. I would fix it myself, but couldn't find the correct part of the page markup to do so. Seanette (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction needed, I don't know how 

message: See Talk:List_of_month-long_observances#Keeping_this_article_and_the_various_articles_on_months_in_sync. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open RfC related to this article.
Talk:Nominal number

message: DV8 2XL removed the following paragraph from the article and asked me to discuss in talk why I added it:
:If nominal numbers are a string of numerals (such as digits or letters), then additional digitwise operations can be defined on them. For instance, applying some total order on the numbers, such as a lexicographic order on the numerals, allows for collation of the numbers as ordinal numbers. Assigning a numeric value to each distinct numeral allows for calculations on the digits within a nominal number for redundancy checks, such as checksums to determine if the number is valid, that is, to verify its membership in a certain defined set.
If converting nominal numbers to digit strings for use as ordinal numbers is not to be discussed in Nominal number, then neither is converting nominal numbers to digit strings for use in a redundancy check. Would you please also delete that part? --Damian Yerrick 21:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In a bloody rush I made an bad mistake, I am re-inseting that paragraph and I beg your pardon. An unacceptable act of haste on my part DV8 2XL 22:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Damian Yerrick 22:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion 

message: Another good example is the game of Sudoku. The numbers 1 to 9 are used, but they have no numerical significance, they might as well be 9 different colours. 131.251.134.152 (talk) 20:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example: Sudoku 

message: Suggesting to merge with Numbering scheme --Krauss (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Numbering scheme?
Talk:Tributes to Eddie Guerrero

message: Hello All,
I understand there will be temptation to dispute this article's neutrality or put it up for deletion just because it may simply appear as glorifying Eddie Guerrero.
However, the need for a special article, just like RAW is Owen was expressed by many Eddie fans on Eddie's bio-page. 
I'm carrying out that very appropriate desire, and I ask for all Eddie and WWE fans to help in making this purely factual and a Wikipedia article of quality, for Eddie's sake. 
I love you Eddie. I'm gonna really miss you.
Jai Sri Rama!!
Rama's Arrow 17:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Marcus Choleva

message: This article (a) reads poorly in English and (b) despite its description of Choleva's background, smacks of anti-semitism in its envious treatment of his salary.  Rather unfair, in my view!
I have removed some things to avoid misunderstandings and subjectivity. Bennyman 00:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled