lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jack Hui

message: 1. The argument provided by user Cyktsui to delete this page is that the case is only suspected. However, the nature of the case is clearly stated in the article: "Hui pleaded not guilty in the first trial on January 12, 2007 and the judge granted a request to delay the trial so that Hui could sit for the Hong Kong Advanced Level Examination.". There is no defamatory, only attributable facts.
2. The subject in question is sufficiently notable, not only because of his suspected indecent assault case, but also his achievement. Googling his Chinese name will result in tons of verifiable information.
3. The article is neutral and independent (As a matter of fact, I don't know Mr.Hui personally) but I know more about him because of the reports of his case from the mass media. 
4. The article is informative, and well sourced.
That's all, thanks!. - INTELer 17:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not saying the article is POV, but it seems like Jack Hui is not significant enough as Wikipedia article.  There are a large nubmer of people participated in IMO, with higher achievement, but not having their own article (not that they should). --Cyktsui 13:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I truly wonder why this article exists. Getting several medals in IMO is no doubt exceptionally yet it is not significant enough to be placed on wikipedia. There are simply too many medal winners in IMO history. For sexual assault, there are also many sexual assault cases every year, and I can't see any point of singling out this case and put it here even though it may be the talk of the town right now. 221.126.80.178 17:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest an election should be raised for the public to decide whether the article should be deleted or remains its existence in wikipedia, or to consult the AMA. WP:AMA, WP:DR.  Narold 10:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons to keep the article "Jack Hui"
Talk:Portswood Primary School

message: A small stub article that needs references and more details about the school itself. Could also include a picture and info-box. Camaron1 | Chris 19:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I have removed the PROD tag. Although primary schools are not generally notable this particular one seems to have a number of notable features. It is a Beacon School, it was classified as outstanding in its recent OFSTED inspection, and it has won a national award for its programme for gifted and talented pupils. It also has an interesting ethnic make-up. The article appears to have been written by an American with no knowledge of the British education system. The article needs improving not deleting. Dahliarose 23:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The argument is sound - I put the PROD on it due the schools apparent lack of notability, though it does appear you are right that this school does have some unique features. The problem is the article has not been edited for months before now, perhaps for the time being, a merge to Portswood would work. Or at least something on the school be put in the article, as it currently does not have anything on it at all. Camaron1 | Chris 09:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think if someone has the time it might well be possible to write a reasonable article on this school, based on the information in the OFSTED report. It should also be possible to add sources such as this one about the school's gifted and talented programme. Dahliarose 15:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have linked the school article from the Portswood article, hopefully that will solve the orphan issue and encourage expansion. Camaron1 | Chris 16:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested deletion
Talk:Drumchapel Amateur F.C.

message: Andy Gray, is this Andy Gray who is now a commentator for Sky? If so how many games did he play, because his first side was Back Fc. And I've never heard of him playing for any other amateur side.--Allanmac9 17:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Highfield School

message: Nice stub article with some good information. Main areas for improvement are to expand the article to cover more areas of the school than history and to attempt to reference from more than one source. Camaron1 | Chris 18:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I've added 2 maintenance tags. Currently, there is only one reference, so I added refimprove. As a consequence, I'm also not sure that this school is notable.  Primary schools are required to meet WP:GNG (they don't have a presumption of notability like secondary schools), and one independent reference usually isn't enough to do that.  However, since there is at least partial indication of notability, I'll leave it for a while to see if other editors know of more sources to improve this, rather than me just redirecting it. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance tags
Talk:Chester Crocker

message: I have noted a discrepancy in the time he commenced his tenure as Assistant Secretary of State in the main article he has the position in "In April 1981, Assistant Secretary of State Crocker was dispatched to Africa on a two-week, eleven-nation tour to lay the groundwork for the new policy." While in the Bio box he does not commence this position until June 9, 1981 a clarification would be good.
Matt (talk) 03:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy
Talk:Time in India

message: Insert non-formatted text herehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Time_in_India&diff=121779137&oldid=121775916
Indon (Talk | contribs) (rv redirect. It's all there in the Indian Standard Time. No need to duplicate materials. Why don't you just edit in Indian Standard Time instead of making a competition?
This one ist about Time in India in general, not about Indian Standard Time in specific. See :Category:Time by country Tobias Conradi (Talk) 02:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's so more general than IST? I see the current content is very few and you can simply add that in IST. — Indon (reply) — 07:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can, but it would not belong there. Because Bombay time is not IST. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 00:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Fray/A Christian influence

message: is there anyone who can find information on the fray as having christian influences?  that's a widely held rumor, and they are a "christian" band, or at least are christians themselves, but that hasn't been addressed (either to confirm, or deny) in the article
*The Fray are pretty popular with Contemporary Christian audiences, especially since all of the members went to Christian academies. However, they say that they don't intentionally write for a Christian audience  Teemu08 05:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the CCM Wikiproject tab on the top, primarily because the Fray does play on some CCM stations, and are a part of the project. Casey14 17:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the CCM - I plan to do so on the project to. If the Fray say they don't do christian music - then who are we to say they do? That's insane. Daniel()Folsom |\T/|\C/|\U/|(Can you help me with my signature?) 17:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Being a part of a certain wikiproject does not mean that they are a part of the genre.  They Fray's music plays on CCM and Christian Rock stations.  They are also charted on CCM and Christian Rock charts.  Those two criterion both qualify them for the CCM Music Wikiproject even if they say they are CCM or not.  They are important to the project, and a part of the project, thus the link to the project will stay. Casey14 23:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian influence
Talk:The Fray/A GA

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of September 23, 2006, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Good here.  But what is "other" under discography?  Other what? DVD? single? Music video? Podcast?  In the singles chart, the individual chart names should be in small print ()
:2. Factually accurate?: Superb.  Very well referenced.
:3. Broad in coverage?: OK here.  The band is still so new.  Most bios or band pages have a selected events section.  Can you have a section with other itmes, like arrests,, charity events, etc...
:4. Neutral point of view?: yep!
:5. Article stability? This is hte biggest area of failure. A good article should be perfect as is.  However, this has a whole section named "Current events."  Thats another way of saying "This section is is going to be obsolete soon."  While most articles about people require regular updating, every effort should be made to phrase things in a way that if it were neglected for a while, a reader wouldn't feel like the article sounds dated.  For example, this sentence needs updating "On September 19, they will release a CD/DVD set with exclusive content."  The current events section should be merged with the section "How to Save a Life (late 2005–early 2006)" and that section should be just be named "How to Save a Life"  Most band life cycles are one album or tour to the next.
:6. Images?: good.
:: I addressed the above suggestions aside from the the "selected events". Since the band is still pretty new, there haven't been too many major award nominations, charity events, or other stuff of that nature. Should such things happen, I'll add a section for it, but I think the article should wait-and-see as far as that's concerned.  Thanks for the input, though. Teemu08 03:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: This article seems to be right on to me, but it lacks enough references in the How to Save a Life section. Fix that, and I would pass it. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 00:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article nomination
Talk:The Fray/A Article Links

message: I came to see this article a while ago, and it had tons of fan sites dedicated to the Fray. Now I can't find them, where'd they go? Bmerkl 22:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plenty of mistakes on Wikipedia pages - does that mean that we should purposely do them on every page? No. Don't add sewage to the already polluted pool.Daniel()Folsom |\T/|\C/|\U/|(Can you help me with my signature?) 21:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened?
Talk:The Fray/A Band Genre

message: A while back the genre was listed as "Alternative rock".  Now it's "piano rock".  While The Fray are undoubtedly piano rock I think they are sufficiently influenced by alternative that they should have alternative listed as a genre as well.  The biggest alternative influence is in the vocals, and the guitars (when they are present) also have a tinge of alt-rock in them.24.238.218.27 23:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Rock
Talk:Informal wear

message: This article seriously needs help!  I'd be happy to help out and edit parts of it, but I wouldn't even know where to begin!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.254.112 (talk) 04:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: Workplace attire probably needs a separate page, which could contain the section "Usage in the workplace", as this is mostly not about Informal Attire.  Thoughts anyone?  
-- TimNelson (talk) 04:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Workplace Attire

message: This section has nothing to do with this article and should therefore be deleted. Coemgenv (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dressing "Western"

message: I would like to make it known that the user Toddst1 is now trolling my contributions and reverting edits I make as "opinions" or "unsourced" in an aggressive and non-constructive manner.  Perhaps most interestingly, his reversion of my latest edit here is, "(rv deletion of source / insertion of opinion)" HOWEVER the mention of " or a polo shirt with dress pants." is actually not mentioned in the source.  So basically, the author has presented false information, which is WORSE than an opinion.  The Virginia Tech article posits a knit shell underneath a jacket, not a polo with trousers.  I am not trying to grind any agenda, but suggesting that a polo and dress pants is an ahistorical view- so THAT should be sourced, which it isn't.  Traditional assumptions need to be made since this entire article is a matter of opinion and perspective, the classic definitions need to be held until disproven.
I am going to delete it again, as my original edit comment is still accurate that the statement is grammatically incorrect.  "The suit is typically dark-coloured (with or without a pattern), grey, dark blue, brown, or black. The suit is worn with a long-sleeved shirt and a tie or a polo shirt with dress pants." That's a fact, not an opinion Also, stop trolling, it doesn't reflect well on your credibility as a knowledge curator.Coemgenv (talk) 22:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Toddst1 trolling

message: Comleted after longstanding, unopposed proposal. Having to separate articles with seemingly identical scope didn't really make sense. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dress clothes]] merged with [[informal wear]]
Talk:Nemateleotris magnifica

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Fire dartfish (Nemateleotris magnifica) (43372442502).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 26, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-09-26. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 17:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Battle of Sark

message: There is a considerable mismatch between the numbers in the info box and the text.  Casualty range is discussed in text was not matched in info box, so I have corrected.  However, though I suspect the smaller text figures are correct for participants, I cannot confirm that.  Could a more knowledgeable or better equipped editor tackle that, please? Monstrelet (talk) 14:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers

message: I've reverted a major revision of the text in the last few days.  This revision deleted most of the references of the current version to create a huge new battle. While the battle is less well known than we would wish, a new theory, apparently derived from original research, should be explored here on the talk page and, if shown to be a legitimate variant based on published accounts, placed in the article along with the more commonly accepted account. Monstrelet (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Just glancing at the figures for e.g. Otterburn, Bannockburn, these edits would have claimed that this was a very large battle by the standards of Anglo-Scottish medieval warfare, which needs firm evidence. PatGallacher (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of edit
Talk:Regents Park, Southampton

message: Where is this? Please add maps and more detail! AlanFord 18:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Can someone explain why the articles about the city suburbs have the suffix Hampshire rather than Southampton? e.g. Shirley, Hampshire rather than Shirley, Southampton (which is now a re-direct). As a Shirley resident, I don't consider that I live in Hampshire but rather in the City of Southampton, and I'm proud of it.  On looking at the edit history, most of the articles were re-named in November 2006, with the edit summary "correct form of disambiguation". Where is this policy set out? Can you imagine renaming say, Edge Hill, Liverpool to Edge Hill, Lancashire simply because it falls within the boundaries of the old county of Lancashire? Daemonic Kangaroo 10:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of articles about city suburbs
Talk:Bullying

message: — Assignment last updated by Jessicacariello (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: STS 1010

message: In the verbal subsection of the individual subsection of the types subsection, I propose changing the line:
Use of body language (i.e., the middle finger) to torture someone
To:
Use of body language (i.e., the middle finger) to torment someone
I think that the use of the word torture is too extreme for describing giving someone the finger. Sim (talk) 14:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2023 

message: Sadism is the primary motivation; pleasure derived from inflicting hurt on another. Show me the bully who is not demonstrably enjoying the activity. Dismal that such a self-evident truth is not acknowledged. 122.151.210.84 (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sadism 

message: one of the external links points to a page on enotalone.com which was moved and should be updated to point to https://www.enotalone.com/article/abuse-violence/the-secret-school-life-of-adolescents-r5639/
Sorry, I can't do it myself as it does not allow me. I would appreciate if someone with proper access can make the change. Kamurj (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  link needs updating 

message: in the verbal subsection of individual bullying in types subsection, it is mentioned that body language is equal to middle finger showing. this is not the case. in many parts of the world, people don't know what middle finger means, and many people use other body language too. 
 I suggest changing "(i.e)" to "(e.g)".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.130.204.250 (talk) 09:32, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  body language not restricted to middle finger 

message: — Assignment last updated by J2singh (talk) 05:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender, Race and Computing

message: newspsper of bullying 41.13.94.146 (talk) 18:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English  

message: — Assignment last updated by Mtaz0801 (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development winter 2024
Talk:Genoese crossbowmen

message: Why does this article end abruptly on Crécy? The article states that the crossbowmen were active until the 16th century. 174.97.143.125 (talk) 10:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further history? 
Talk:Irving Shain

message: I was a student at UW-Madison during Prof. Shain's tenure as Chancellor, including the period where the Teaching Assistants Association (TAA) union called a strike in the spring of 1980 and attempted to shut down the university by picketing and blocking entrances to university buildings and disrupting lectures.  Each side of that dispute had valid arguments, yet this article as presently written is quite one-sided towards the TAA position. Randy549 18:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to lessen the POV comments and make it more neutral, however, i have no knowledge of the incident. – Lordmontu (talk) • (contribs) 21:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Comments
Talk:Nuisance wildlife management

message: Thank you Greatestrowerever for your changes to this my first article. I am a wildlife control officer in California and hope this article is useful. I tried to link it to the existing wildlife management page but that link comes up red for some reason, perhaps you could tell me how to fix that? Bugguyak 18:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The Ethics section seems like it could use some cleaning up  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.161.210 (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed some of it. Go ahead and WP:Be_bold, and edit it some more if you feel it needs more work.Bugguyak (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?
Talk:STS-71

message: Is there any confirmation of New Scientist's article about russian crew?
Here's the text: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14619831-900-alien-landing/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by XaHyMaH (talk • contribs) 05:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aliens from outer space"
Talk:Greenville station (South Carolina)

message: I'm employed at the Greenville County Library's South Carolina history room, and to our knowledge, there is no 'still existing' Southern Railway depot building. The early twentieth-century structure that this depot replaced was demolished in the 1990s. However we'd be interested to know if there's another surviving structure that served this purpose.74.255.70.193 (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Regular Baptists

message: The article Primitive baptist lists Regular Baptist among "other names by which Primitive Baptists are known." Are they really the same thing? If so, the two articles should be merged. If not, the text calling them equivalent should be altered.
DanB†DanD 18:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Primitive baptist = Regular Baptist?

message: The lead seems POV to me ("diverse group" "through the labors"). The List strikes me as very much OR and some POV. I think this needs to be cleaned-up and sourced or stubified. Novaseminary (talk) 04:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV/OR
Talk:Munir Niazi

message: The file :File:Ibn Insha, Ashfaq Ahmed, Muneer Niazi and A. Hameed.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Ibn Insha, Ashfaq Ahmed, Muneer Niazi and A. Hameed.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Ibn Insha, Ashfaq Ahmed, Muneer Niazi and A. Hameed.jpg]]
Talk:Peachtree station

message: Here an article from second source discuss about evaluating new location at Atlanta Journal Constitution's Amtrak seeks new digs at Metro Section, page B1: https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-atlanta-journal-constitution/20110829/textview
Someone who has the PressReader.com account can read this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjluna2 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atlanta Journal Constitution - Amtrak seeks new digs
Talk:Muriel Young

message: Muriel Young (19 June 1928 – 24 March 2001) 
Muriel Young died at the age of 77.
One of these is wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.163.138.15 (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed; the 77 years old is absolutely wrong going by the sources used for this article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 15:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong age? 

message: I don't remember if it was Christmas (?) but just once they got Muriel Young into a Bunny Girl type outfit for one of the children's shows she did. She looked very good in it.(58.11.92.138 (talk) 09:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you got any links to pictures of this? Cheers. MartiniShaw (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bunny Girl
Talk:Burn This

message: The plot synopsis that starts this article does not match the production I saw of this last night. I have not changed the entry, because it is possible that (illegal?) changes were made to the script in the production that I saw (rather than the plot synopsis here being wrong). Specifically, it was an important point in the production that I saw that just one of Robbie's roommates was invited - the female - and that the family tried to pretend (for their own benefit) that she was "the girlfriend." Could someone clear this up? --Msheskin 18:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot