lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2/Workshop

message: I'm in this Arb case to get it decided one way or the other, whether it is OK to give the link to a person's or organization's website in its article, even if the site is considered defamatory, libelous and/or illegal in some jurisdiction. See also my arguments at Talk:Robert Priddy.
Extreme cases would be stormfront.org and the Zundelsite (which are linked in their artickes), nearer to these case are sites set up by ex-members and other enemies of NRMs, like http://home.chello.no/~reirob/ run by Robert Priddy and http://www.xenu.de run by Tilman Hausherr -- or for an all arounf smear campaign against everybody not in the true church, http://www.chick.com run by Jack Chick.
Obviously (I hope) that doesn't mean treating these sites as reliable sources or giving these weblinks on the article pages of the attacked religions (but sadly noting, that chick.com is given rather often as a weblink and xenu.de is used a source for articles).
I don't have a formulation at hand right, now, so I just state it here on talk. 
Pjacobi 19:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weblinks to sites which are considered defamatory, libelous and/or illegal in some jurisdiction 

message: I would like to inform all parties, clerks and arbitrators that I an currently suffering connection problems at home, and cannot access the Internet for more than a couple of hours from the local cybercafe/library. I hope this will be taken into account if further contributions from myself are short. In the meantime I have presented a partial list of Evidence at the evidence page. This will need to be updated with more information about SSS108's disruptive editing, Freelanceresearch and Kkrystian, and their collaboration thereof. Hope it is fine for now. Ekantik talk 17:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Connection seems to work fine now, but still touch-and-go. Ekantik talk 04:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Connection problems

message: User:UninvitedCompany wrote
:"In light of his ongoing activism at Sathya Sai Baba [..]"
I have repeatedly but unsuccessfully requested diffs (to Fred Bauder, Krill Lokshin and UninvitedCompany) that show that I am an activist at Sathya Sai Baba. As such I consider this statement libel and in violation of WP:BLP and I have the freedom to remove it not bound by three revert rule. Can a clerk remove it please? Andries 08:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BLP]] violation
Talk:Senator William V. Roth Jr. Bridge

message: I live spitting distance from the bridge. My camera isn't the best, but it's passable. What kind of angle would be best? --72.94.5.164 (talk) 12:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Try looking at the bridge.  Walk around it, over it, under it.  Look at it in the morning and the afternoon, when the light may be on different sides of it.  And take lots of pictures.  Then you can figure out which one is best. - Denimadept (talk) 15:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture needed?
Talk:St. Georges Bridge (Delaware)

message: ...  The paragraph that says "The St. Georges Bridge is a steel tied arch bridge that carries U.S. Route 13 (US 13) across the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal in St. Georges, Delaware. Built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and opened in 1942 as a high-level crossing, the bridge was the first four-lane, high-level crossing to span the canal. It replaced a previous vertical lift bridge which was damaged when a German merchant ship collided with it.[3]" appears to wrongly say that the previous vertical lift bridge was damaged by a German merchant ship, with a source citation [3] given.  The ship was actually a U.S. ship, the S.S. Waukegan.  The source citation [3] does not mention any German ship.  
...  In my opinion, the statement should be revised to name the S.S. Waukegan and the date of the accident (I don't have it in front of me), and the mention of a German ship and the erroneous citation [3] should be removed.  
...  All this is way beyond my abilities.  A volunteer familiar with Wiki writing would need to make the changes!
...  The S.S. Waukegan has its own Wikipedia write-up, which agrees with newspaper and other stories of the event.
Kibitzer!qwerty (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation #3 does not mention German ship
Talk:TurboCache

message: "It may be reported on the box that the graphics card has 128MiB or 256MiB. This figure often includes the system memory used with the memory on the graphics card, which may be as little as 64MiB or 32MiB."
I'm fairly certain they won't print those crazy new units on the side of the box, but I guess that's what they mean.  I wonder if the Mebibyte will ever be used anywhere besides wikipedia.
--Johnruble 19:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's policy as such... I just think it's one of those things (like AD/CE) that a few editors get so worked up about that they can't bear not to change! *grins* 86.136.251.18 03:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Kseferovic

message: User:Kseferovic
Category:	8
Image talk:	3
Image:	78
Mainspace	1205
Portal:	4
Talk:	87
Template talk:	13
Template:	116
User talk:	281
User:	225
Wikipedia talk:	2
Wikipedia:	141
avg edits per article	2.73
earliest	04:30, 1 February 2006
number of unique articles	793
total	2163
2006/2 	50 	
2006/3 	164 	
2006/4 	129 	
2006/5 	356 	
2006/6 	267 	
2006/7 	103 	
2006/8 	108 	
2006/9 	357 	
2006/10 	255 	
2006/11 	167 	
2006/12 	207 	
Kseferovic's editcount summary stats as of 19:16, Friday December 29th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 19:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Newark Bay Bridge

message: I do not beleive this bridge is a cantilever truss. To be a cantilever (and not a continuous truss), there should be a zero-moment connection in the span. Please provide a reference that shows that this is a cantilever. - SCgatorFan (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge Type - Continuous Three-span Steel Arch Truss or Cantilever Truss 

message: Tooting my own horn a bit, does anyone think my new photo would be an improvement at the top of the article?  Jim.henderson (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: This article says that the Newark Bay Turnpike Bridge "is similar in length and design to the Francis Scott Key Bridge at Baltimore's Outer Harbor." However, I think it would be more appropriate to compare it with the Delaware River – Turnpike Toll Bridge. Aside from different lengths, the two Turnpike bridges look identical, whereas the F. S. Key bridge is easily distinguishable. I recommend we remove the reference to the F.S. Key bridge, since the comparison is a stretch compared with the Delaware River Turnpike Bridge. 138.16.42.247 (talk) 01:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Similar to the Delaware River Turnpike Bridge than Francis S. Key
Talk:Outerbridge Crossing

message: While the identity of the person that the bridge is named after is well-sourced, and I don’t doubt that the fact that there was a person named Outerbridge involved would come as a surprise to lots of people, is there any reliable source that people are surprised or confused?  That kind of editorializing isn’t appropriate for a Wikipedia article.  NewkirkPlaza (talk) 01:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “mistakenly assuming” about name
Talk:Jihad Jerry & the Evildoers

message: I am going to combine my article Army Girls Gone Wild into this article along with content about the final album, Mine Is Not A Holy War.Hotspur23 (talk) 03:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recombine articles  

message: I updated a bit based on it being outdated (even with others' additions of the 2021 work) but I don't want to overhaul it all myself. The summary up top should probably stop at describing style and have a separate non-discography section on chronology that combines the bits in the summary and resurgence.
jzp (talk) 15:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs work
Talk:PC-cillin

message: A similar discussion occurred on the McAfee article.  The article should remain unbiased.  Nor should this article be a troubleshooting guide.  After checking other major anti-virus software articles (Symantec, Microsoft, ZoneAlarm, CA, AVG, BitDefender), there were no criticism areas (McAfee had one, but it was removed).  Besides, criticisms such as being a "memory hog" are practically found in every anti-virus software.  This area should be removed. PhnxFyreG 19:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism - Flaws with the program
Talk:Republic Bank

message: Quoting the article:  "By 1977 majority shareholding was in the company was in national hands[3]."
There is something wrong with this sentence.  Wanderer57 (talk) 02:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad wording 

message: Are Republic affected at all - anyone know ? -- Beardo (talk) 19:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 financial crisis
Talk:ECWA Evangel Hospital

message: This is a good start but it would be good to try to find some significant parts of the history besides the construction of buildings. Changes in direction, new programs, difficulties? Place of Evangel in overall health care of Jos? Financial basis? Research activities? Mikeblyth 19:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: I could not find a coordinate for this exact named hospital, so I used the coordinate for the Bingham University Teaching Hospital which is on the ECWA campus.   Is this the current name for this hospital? WP:HOS  -- Talk to G Moore 11:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Coord
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Winter sports

message: Incase anyone is still active in the project I would like to suggest that this Project should merge with its parent project,WikiProject Sport, and be made into a task force perhaps.Im happy to help.
Cheers WikiEditCrunch (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to merge as neither are really active. Both are just catchalls for topics that spread across more than one sport. There really isn't much of a difference between a task force and wikiproject except maybe a few pages not duplicated and less banners. But there really isn't much benefit to moving an already existing project to be a task force and inactive ones just remain as historical because activity may restart. -DJSasso (talk) 15:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project merger
Talk:Offer in compromise

message: Much of this article sounds like a "how to" narrative. This will have to be edited to make it encyclopedic. Also remove repeated references to "you" and replace with phrases such as "the taxpayer." Check external links for compliance with Wikipedia rules. Famspear 06:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "How to" material needs some work
Talk:Muntz metal

message: Is it really "notable" that the Cutty Sark's bottom sheathing is made of this alloy, when it was the standard material for the time? PeteVerdon 07:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How many other ships using it are preserved? Andy Mabbett 11:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cutty Sark - notable? 

message: The Muntz family sold the rights to Muntz Metal in the 1950s? Can someone explain to how a patent can be enforced for over 100 years. Rsduhamel 21:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The original quote was "Muntz Metal was sold to another company in the 1950s so it's no longer in the family but it's still a part of our family's heritage." Perhaps it refers to something else, such as a company called MM? Andy Mabbett 14:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems confused - there seems to be quite a bit of evidence that the company was absorbed first by Elliots and then IMI in the 20's. IMI also bought a firm called Muntz Plastics in 1972, so I'm not sure if this is some family history getting scrambled. I've tried to expand the corporate stuff, as it's vaguely interesting and adds 'colour'. FlagSteward 01:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rights to Muntz Metal 

message: This is a fascinating discussion of the man and his company, but on an article titled "Muntz metal" I'd expect more details like the density of the material, ductile properties, and whether the trace of iron makes it react with magnetic fields.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.56.145 (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properties of Muntz Metal? 
Talk:Cleopatra Stratan

message: Does anyone have any legal pictures for use on this page? Basketball110 15:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: What ever happened to the picture hosted at wikimedia? --Fpmfpm (talk) 04:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture 
Talk:Mawk

message: Mawk, the musician. Is this notable? The band doesn't even have a page. I am reverting this page back to the redirect to AWK programming language, but here is the "Mawk" page for reference: 
 

Mawk is the stage name for Mark Young, bass player with
rapcore band, (hed)pe and supposedly derived from  Mark's own pronunciation of his name.
Mark was born in Co. Durham, England.
Category:California musicians
Category:English bass guitarists
I do not believe this man to be notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Please see WP:N. --Makaristos 19:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I take it back. The band does have a page, at %28h%C9%99d%29_pe. However, this means that the musician's page belongs at Mark Young (musician) and this page (mawk) should be a disambiguation page, which is how I would set it up. (I still, incidentally, believe that this is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia, but whatever…) --Makaristos 19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Palestinian state

message: ==Voting/Comments==
# Support. --יהושועEric 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the same failed merge proposed above, as that one involved merging this article, Palestinian state, with the relatively distinct State of Palestine article.  --AbnnTalk 06:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Discussion

message: # Support. --יהושועEric 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting/Comments

message: I would like to propose that we merge these two articles:
* Proposals for a Palestinian state
* Palestinian state
The contents of these two articles appear to me to be so similar that it isn't worth trying to maintain them as separate articles.  --AbnnTalk 06:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the same failed merge proposed above, as that one involved merging this article, Palestinian state, with the relatively distinct State of Palestine article.  --AbnnTalk 06:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to proposal: [[Proposals for a Palestinian state]] 

message: I will redirect to State of Palestine, as I doubt anyone searching for Palestinian state is after Proposals for a Palestinian state.93.96.148.42 (talk) 02:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of redirection to [[State of Palestine]]
Talk:Heavy Weight Champ

message: Frankly, this article reads like promotional material from someone associated with the band itself.  I was very tempted to slap a POV tag on it as this really appears to be overkill for a relatively small indy band of questionable notability.  The fact that it was created at least four times as duplicate articles also suggests this is article is promotional in nature.
This article seriously lacks reliable sources.  This band is critically acclaimed by who? Who says they are "renowned for song writing of the highest calibre and their amazingly passionate and precise live shows"?  Much of the discography sections are excessively detailed and appear to be unverifiable.  Much of the article overall appears to be unverifiable, as I am having a great deal of difficulty finding sources on the web outside of the bands own website and myspace page. Resolute 19:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This page was definitely done by a fan. I've redone it with NPOV (I hope). Also moved the albums to separate pages. BrianFG 22:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources?
Talk:Camp Widjiwagan

message: Well, I created this page a while ago, been busy so I haven't had the time to update it, but I'm going to get back to it now. Adding links in from other places and updating information and the like. Let me know if you think it's lacking anything specific and I'll look into it.
DuncmanG 19:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Widji's website is www.widji.org  you might get some info there
WIDJI ROX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yesss!!!!!!
Just started working on some pretty major edits. Adding tables to lay out trip progressions more clearly, etc. I may try to get a hold of a copy of the Widji history book next time i swing by camp, to add some more dates and such. Ben.ratzlaff (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Widjiwagan 

message: Someone should talk about the "widji way." Things like the bottom of your canoe is only allowed to touch water air and bread dough.. :-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannasteve (talk • contribs) 00:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The widji way
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China/Cartography

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 19:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards
Talk:Paul Stacey

message: Are these the twins Paul and Jeremy Stacey that starred in the British television series The Famous Five back in 1978?! I mean, how many twin brothers with this name are there... Thanks for a reply if someone has details on that. --80.171.229.162 (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not mentioned on any of their websites or in any of their interviews, so I guess not. Bondegezou (talk) 11:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

text: That is very possible. I will have a word with their sister next time I see her and ask for you. 82.10.149.199 (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Five 1978?
Talk:Neoarchean

message: AMK152 proposed in edits of 27 December 2006 a geotimebox for this article as follows:
I feel that the box information that is appropriate for the article is already in the Neoarchean infobox and the footer, and that other extraneous information, such as susequent eons, can be supplied where important, by links from the text.  I removed the geotimebox and left the footer, pending discussion.  See discussion at Template talk:Geotimebox --Bejnar 19:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:AMK152|AMK152's]] Geotimeboxes

message: Archaea separated from the other two domains in 2.7 Ga: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070820175435.htm
Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 19:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2.7 Ga Archaea

message: The article is in dire need of expansion in terms of content. I would add developments that occurred during the era that led to environmental changes in future eras as well as include updates to changes made in previous eras. I would also want to improve some of the structure of sections, as the writing is somewhat clunky and seems out of order. For example, the complex life sections started with the abundance of oxygen released through exygenic photosynthesis and ended with the photoautotrophs that had released that oxygen from earlier in the era. Also, even with the limited amount of information in the article, the entire complex life section isn't cited by any sources. -Tdaniels38 (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content expansion and restructuring/Source additions
Talk:List of law enforcement agencies in Nevada

message: Why?  This cleanly fits into the Nevada government category and keeps all parts of the government listed in the Nevada Categories.  Vegaswikian 19:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. It's just that there are half a dozen lists that all seem to cover the same thing. Was just doing cleanup of redundancies. Chris 00:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge? 

message: Anyone know if this still should be tagged as an incomplete list?  I'm considering pulling that tag. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: highly likely that there are more county and municipal departments. ninety:one 16:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete 
Talk:Jeremy Stacey

message: BY the way he also played with "Jason Rebello" toured with him and i think he played on the album "keeping time" by rebello :)
Wasn't he linked with Swing Out Sister in some way?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.107.194 (talk) 23:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: link removed - not the same Jeremy Stacey 109.153.250.192 (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link
File talk:Na pali.jpg

message: This is a lovely picture, but I believe it is mainly of Hoolulu Beach, the next beach over on the Na Pali Coast.  It is as of now inaccessible by land, due to a landslide, but can be reached by kayaking or swimming (by a strong and experienced swimmer with fins) from Kalalau Beach.  The beach all the way in the left of this photo is Kalalau in the summer, when more beach is exposed than in the stormy and turbulent winter.  There is currently no article for Hoolulu Beach.  Another interesting fact about it is that they filmed sections of King Kong there (I believe the more recent version).  72.234.10.190 20:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the right picture?
Talk:Lusitanians

message: I think this should be renamed "Lusitanian people", since there is already a Lusitanian language article, and "Lusitanian" is a disambiguation page. FilipeS 20:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has that been done in any other instance? the present arrangement has the virtues of succinctness and clarity. --Wetman 11:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?
Talk:George Nozuka

message: I added three images provided by George Nozuka. I will leave it to other editors to determine which, if any, should be in the info box, and to determine the placement of the other two. --SPhilbrick(Talk) 01:43, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images recently added 

message: hello
The last FM source says he is of Caucasian descent. This means his ancestors are from the Caucasus region, not that they are white.
When using this term in a genealogical sense, Caucasian always refers to being from the Caucasus, no exceptions, not even in U.S. English.
199.101.62.225 (talk) 11:44, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  caucasian