lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kings of the Wild Frontier

message: Multiple "Genre"s are okay to list, if the album fits under Punk, post-punk, New Wave, New Romantic, Antmusic, etc....  Then list them ALL.Antmusic 17:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the Genre change 
Talk:Night in the Ruts

message: I read an interview from Brad Whitford that Joe Perry had left before he recorded a solo for "Three Mile Smile."  Both Brad and Jimmy Crespo recorded solos for that tune, and Steven liked Crespo's better so that went on the record.  I'm also pretty sure Joe played a solo on "Reefer Headed Woman" and "Think About It" from their autobiography.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.151.130.71 (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Rocks (Aerosmith album)

message: I suggest that this article be either redirected or merged into Rocks (album), as it is unreferenced and may not be notable enough for its own article. I will redirect or merge in about a week unless convinced otherwise.--DisturbedNerd999 (Delete!) 07:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal for [[Lick and a Promise]] 

message: Does anybody have a copy of Aerosmith's Greatest Hits CD? I'm just wondering if they can confirm whether it credits Tom Hamilton and Jack Douglas with singing backing vocals on "Home Tonight", which is what the reference in the sub-section "Home Tonight" says, but which the original vinyl album does not say. The original only credits Joey Kramer with backing vocals on the song. Akdrummer75 (talk) 03:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatest Hits  
Talk:Toys in the Attic (album)

message: * Not a standard (see WikiProject albums)
* Also impossible to read
--Fantailfan 16:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting teeny-tiny song credits 

message: Separating vinyl sides one and two is very common; check all Beatles, Rolling Stones, etc., where vinyl release preceded by years or decades the CD release. Continuing track numbering is my innovation, for those who have little or no vinyl. Fantailfan (talk) 20:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all for splitting the track listing where the original (or prominent) format was vinyl.  What I meant was that I have never seen an article where the first song on side two isn't #1, and that on every vinyl label I've seen, the numbering is not continued from previous sides. —Zeagler (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just putting out there. The Disturbed</span>]]Nerd999 (Delete!) 20:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

text: After a full week of no objections, I went ahead and boldly redirected these pages.--DisturbedNerd999 (Delete!) 20:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Endorsed. Thank you much. / edg ☺ ☭ 14:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vinyl side splitting & number continuation 

message: you added some incomplete short citations to this article in October 2015 (Davis 1997, and Tyler & Dalton 2011). Would you mind expanding those? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: My recent work on JJ Cale and Townes Van Zandt was spurned!  I wash my hands of all editing.  I cited all my sources. If it wasn't good enough, well, I shall walk away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Besmircher (talk • contribs) 02:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  You do realize what the problem is, do you? There are millions of people called "Davis" and while in this case it's probably Stephen Davis, he has written probably hundreds of pieces in 1997, so telling us that the source is "Davis 1997" is inadequate. Using short citations is fine, but you also need to provide full details. If you copied this from some other article, which is also fine, you forgot to copy the accompanying full bibliographical details. Please fix this. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete short citations
Talk:The Art of Drowning (album)

message: This article states afi to be and indie rock band, erm what? -- The Pain 13:49, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No way, man.  AFI was never indie rock.  "Nitro" is HARDLY an indie label.  However, more about the genre: I don't think Art of Drowning is a hardcore album.  They'd started to drift towards Punk Rock at this point, as aparent in the Days of the Phoenix (for instance). - Enzo Dragon 18:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm replacing "Hardcore Punk" with "Punk Rock".  Although this album has Hardcore leanings and all of that, it's taken a definate step away from older albums, and a few babysteps away from Black Sails.  If anyone strongly disagrees, I'd like for them to discuss it here before reverting! - Enzo Dragon 08:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This album I feel is more melodic hardcore.  There are elements of hardcore such as the shouting and fast guitar, especially in the Despair Factor and The Lost Souls.  It may be dark but that doesn't matter.  Never indie rock though, AFI wasn't unique enough: their music complied with the main elemetns of hardcore punk.  And how is Nitro not an indie label?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afifanno1 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie Rock? 

message: "Widely considered the band's best LP"  Well, I think so too, but can we see a reference please?--Jeiki Rebirth 07:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  best LP? 
Talk:Victor (Alex Lifeson album)

message: Darr de ce  esti asa de prost ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.39.51.113 (talk) 15:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stay on These Roads

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 22:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Dirt (Alice in Chains album)

message: The genre "sludge metal" appears to have been added into the infobox. The source from PopMatters doesn't seem to call this album "sludge metal", and the closest reference to this within the text of the source states specifically that the song "Junkhead" has the sound of what would become "sludge rock".
This doesn't meet the criteria for adding a new genre to the infobox, therefore the genre will be removed.
JoeyofScotia (talk) 12:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sludge metal"
Talk:Among the Living

message: I have heard that the character on the cover is actually supposed to be Rev. Henry Kane from the Poltergeist films rather than Randall Flagg. It resembles Kane much more, and Benante has even denied the use of Flagg, as the article states. I seem to recall Scott Ian claiming that Rev. Kane is the scariest character he had ever seen, or something to that effect (and thus used his image), but I cannot find a reference to that currently. I do not know how to add citations to the article but I added the statement, and a reference to the statement can be found at http://www.last.fm/music/Anthrax/Among+The+Living/+wiki. Please, anyone who is more familiar, cite the reference according to policy. Mal7798 (talk) 14:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Image Character 

message: Citation 7 is used for "the album is dedicated to cliff burton". Cliff isn't even mentioned in the citation. It does support the previous sentence though, about benante talking about anthrax seminal album.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.90.175.221 (talk) 20:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 7 does not support the dedication to Cliff Burton
Talk:Attack of the Killer B's

message: Why is Robert Christgau's review linked to on here? A picture of a bomb is not a review in the slightest.
                                                                                      68.193.103.220 (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Christgau's review
Talk:I'm the Man (EP)

message: Based on the version of the same song "I'm the man '91" that came on the Attack of the Killer B's album (released in 1991), on the lyrics it clearly says that this was written 7 years ago and that "7 year later it still holding up fine", I think this is relevant since this will put this song as the first rap metal song chronologically speaking...
This EP was released well after the initial release of I'm The Man, though I can't seem to find references to it. What seems almost certain though is that it was not released on January 1, 1987. For one thing, on this very page it says it was recorded in 1987. Not true for the studio version of I'm The Man (as you noted) but definitely true for the live tracks. I have the CD booklet in front of me and it says, "Live tracks recorded July 11, 1987 at the Arcadia." But that's original research. Plus, the crowd on the live version of I'm The Man clearly knows the song already.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.212.10 (talk) 03:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this was written in 1984 and published until 1987?

message: I'm the Man is also the name of Joe Jackson's second studio album, but a search for "I'm the Man" brings me to this page.
No, this Anthrax is more relevant for history of music  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.100.25.155 (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation Needed 

message: Why is Rapcore included in the genres?
it has nothing to do with the band, I removed it, If you insist it had to do with Rapcore please cite a source. Rashempashem 12:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rapcore? 

message: The citation references a site that has nothing but lyrics to the 1991 version of the song and nowhere does it state the song was written years before.
---
whoever asked that question
The lyrics first 2 lines
1991, always on the run
7 years ago, we wrote this one 
If you actually read the lyrics on that link you would have known that. Everyone that owned the Attack of the Killer B's album knew that, so i don't understand why people comment on band if they don't know their songs.
Czarnibog (talk) 07:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written three years before?
Talk:Stomp 442

message: Does anybody know what Stomp 442 means?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.192.104.251 (talk) 07:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the title mean? 

message: I'm reverting this album to groove metal for the pure purpose of common sense - just because AllMusic may list the album as 'speed metal' does not necessarily mean the descriptor is accurate - this is in fact a generalisation hat refers back to the more popular 80s material and does not reflect the material on this album. It's common knowledge that Anthrax in the 90s changed their style to something not related to speed metal and BARELY related to thrash in order to fit with the common trends at the time (for example listen to a band such as Exciter or Agent Steel, then listen to this album - you will notice the difference how this genre tag is completely inaccurate for 90s Anthrax.)
I think it's ridiculous that just because a "professional source" lists a genre with their review that it automatically means it's correct - it is NOT, and I think it's also daft that in order to list the accurate genre for the album - you have to find an alternative "professional source" from somewhere else that isn't AllMusic in order to prove it's correct - this is something that had to be done with the Chaos AD album when it was listed as "death metal", and guess what - no, it is NOT death metal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.139.27 (talk) 21:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not speed metal
Talk:Sound of White Noise

message: I suggest changing the genre to groove metal. It would be more accurate. Conservoman (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: I was trying to find out a little bit more about the meaning of Hi-Pro-Glo, and I even found some clips from the dog food commercial. However according to some (probably dubious) sources such as Urban Dictionary, the term High-Pro Glow became a slang (originated from this commercial) that has sexual connotation (i.e.: the looks of a woman after orgasm). I don't know how accurate this is, but it does seems on par with the intention of the song's lyrics. I didn't live in the US during the 80s so I didn't catch-up with this slang; but perhaps the song is not a direct referent to the commercial itself, but to the slang (or alleged slang)? --Pinnecco (talk) 04:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi-Pro-Glo 

message: Benante and Bush reunited for a virtual performance of "Packaged Rebellion" on May 26, 2020.https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=iEjuu3UV8u8&feature=emb_logo --Atkinson (talk) 04:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed this from "Reception" section
Talk:The Crazy World of Arthur Brown (album)

message: There is a deluxe (2cd) version of this album  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.18.216.37 (talk) 22:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

message: I've always felt that "Come and Buy" was an amazing song, but then saying that on Wikipedia would lead to a POV complaint.   Is there any connection to the Goblin Market poem by Christina Rossetti?   If someone is logged in, maybe they could create an article on "Come and Buy" and put a link to it?   
Have any other groups done covers or remakes of Come and Buy?  216.99.219.13 (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Come and Buy 

message: In the infobox it says their next album was Backtrack 12 (1970). See in this change. I was on the verge of simply deleting it. But here's my question: What is that? Mark in wiki (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Backtrack 12

message: The mono versions of the tracks from side 1 of the LP which are included on the CD reissues are not from the original mono LP.  They are alternative mixes made before the brass and strings were overdubbed and were unissued until the first CD reissue in 1991. On the Esoteric Recordings 2 CD reissue of 2010, they are quite clearly labelled as "Alternative Mono Mixes", so mentioning this fact will not be original research.  The versions on the mono LP have never been reissued and DO include the brass and strings - they resemble the standard stereo versions much more closely, though they are quite clearly a separate mix rather than a bounce-down of the stereo.Freewheeling frankie (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Mono Versions

message: There is a 3xCDs + 1xLP version that came out last year, containing (seemingly) all the bonus tracks from previous editions, as well as a whole bunch of new stuff, including the actual mono mix digitally for the first time. Might require a reformatting of the article, though, as it's quite long as is. Perhaps make the track lists of the reissues collapsible? --Nerd 101 (talk) 02:45, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  50th Anniversary Super Deluxe Edition 

message: This has to be a joke. Not the first time an album article got stuck with a bizarre and inaccurate genre tag just because someone could source it, but this has to be one of the dumbest examples. Please reconsider it. 2600:8801:710D:EA00:596D:6600:EDFE:2E7F (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychedelic soul?
Talk:Volume 8: The Threat Is Real

message: I'm reverting this album to groove metal for the pure purpose of common sense - just because AllMusic may list the album as 'speed metal' does not necessarily mean the descriptor is accurate - this is in fact a generalisation hat refers back to the more popular 80s material and does not reflect the material on this album. It's common knowledge that Anthrax in the 90s changed their style to something not related to speed metal and BARELY related to thrash in order to fit with the common trends at the time (for example listen to a band such as Exciter or Agent Steel, then listen to this album - you will notice the difference how this genre tag is completely inaccurate for 90s Anthrax.)
I think it's ridiculous that just because a "professional source" lists a genre with their review that it automatically means it's correct - it is NOT, and I think it's also daft that in order to list the accurate genre for the album - you have to find an alternative "professional source" from somewhere else that isn't AllMusic in order to prove it's correct - this is something that had to be done with the Chaos AD album when it was listed as "death metal", and guess what - no, it is NOT death metal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.139.27 (talk) 21:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not speed metal
Talk:...I Care Because You Do

message: There is a disagreement on whether or not to include James as the producer in the infobox. Per WP:STICKTOSOURCE, "Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources." I don't doubt he produced it, but I don't think we should label things explicitly that are not explicitly stated. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: How are you misinterpreting "Everything by Richard D. James"? "Everything" on a record naturally includes production. You are being a stickler over WP:STICKTOSOURCE—this clearly does not fall under it because it is already in the source by its stating "everything". He is well known as an electronic music producer; you are not exercising common sense here. It's stated multiple times in reviews of the record that he produced it. Look, here's a primary source like the record itself: a licensed download of his record on Beatport credits him as the producer. I don't think they'd get the credits for a licensed download wrong. If you can't take "everything" on the album itself as proof he produced it, then I suppose you think nothing else, no critics' reviews or things not from James himself will do, and we can't ever have the producer field filled with his damn name. I don't need to be pinged because I'm not doing a back-and-forth with an editor who's not exercising common sense. This is entirely ridiculous. Ss112 21:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

text: I'm ok with sourcing the sleeve, but it should probably be credited to Richard D. James, not Aphex Twin as that's what the credits says. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, then it should be re-added to the article by whoever. Also, every song on the album on Spotify, when "Show Credits" is clicked, says "Produced by Richard D. James". That's another source that is considered acceptable. Ss112 21:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

text: The infobox is supposed to represent content in the article. The credits section does that well enough. I think we are good.Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Producer credit

message: Before anyone picks this up for GAN, I'd like to clarify that I've found absolutely no other information about the album's recording at all. I checked WP:LIBRARY, nothing. Google Books, nothing either. Yes, I did check news articles, but I didn't find anything. — 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm honestly not surprised though, because James has a history of being secretive with his work process most of the time. — 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording info
Talk:I Never Loved a Man the Way I Love You

message: Re the smell of copyvio. Any evidence? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . And nearly three years later? I have been unable to fid any obvious source(s). Martinevans123 (talk) 21:23, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio?
Talk:3 Years, 5 Months and 2 Days in the Life Of...

message: Why, in the Billboard Chart, does it say Mr. Windle. Is this a typo made by billboard. Should it say [sic] somewhere? Zepheus 19:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. Wendal/Mr. Windle 

message: Adding a release date citation from a page that existed no earlier than 2015 and that itself cites no sources is an unfortunate ouroboros. The editors at XXL likely went to Wikipedia to get a date; found it; used it; and now this wikipedia page is using *that* page as its source.  ??
alainsane (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date citation
Talk:Relationship of Command

message: Michael added the names of the tracks, so those will need to be checked. Guanaco 15:33, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked against amazon listing of this album.  Tracks and sequence checks out ok. -Vina 20:31, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1977 (Ash album)

message: This page says that the version of Jack Names the Planets in the pregap is the original version, but the Jack Names the Planets page says the band didn't like that version and re-recorded it for 1977. Which is right? And what's the picture on the 1977 cover? Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Two questions
Talk:Stars: The Best of 1992–2002

message: I merged Stars - The Best of 1992–2002 (DVD) into Stars: The Best of 1992–2002 and added an infobox as this article was not included in the template for The Cranberries. It now appears in similar fashion to U2's Rattle and Hum CD/Film. jh0367 (talk) 13:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Angmering

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 00:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:United Tasmania Group

message: The United Tasmania Party and Group are the same thing as I can tell. 
The election results (72 & 76) at the Tas Gov site show "United Tasmania Group" and a google search finds no mention of the "United Tasmania Party". I think we should merge these to avoid confusion. I know I'm a bit confused... Jgritz 08:56, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments
Talk:Index of cryptography articles

message: : Note that the above discussion took place over 2 years ago.  Circumstances have changed since then.  The rationale for the AfD (redundancy with categories) no longer applies due to WP:CLN and the ongoing development of Wikipedia's parallel navigation systems.  Articles of this type (hundreds of alphabetical article indexes) make up an important part of Wikipedia's contents system and because they are lists they are presented as part of the encyclopedia proper in the main namespace.  An effort is underway to gather all of these into a single set and clean them up.  This article now conforms to the de facto standard used by other pages of this type, and it is no longer the same page that was discussed 2 years ago.  It has been reformatted to match other alphabetical article lists, and certain self-references have been moved to this talk page.  The talk page links (used for related changes tracking) are hidden, which also conforms to WP:SELF.  If you have any questions about the navigation systems projects currently underway, please feel free to post them to me anytime on my talk page.  Cheers.  The Transhumanist  18:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

message: I've revamped the list so that:
* it includes a lot more cryptography-related pages
* it includes a hidden link to each page's Talk page
* redirect pages are not listed
* it excludes broken links
In this format the page is useful as a "related changes" link list, and also as a list of the canonical names for pages, rather than redirected "aliases". 
— Matt 22:27, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Matt, Now that I've finally noticed your note... I guess I would include broken links, as they can serve as pointers to work that needs to be started, just as your list above does. As for the rest, still very impressed by the amount of work you're doing. ww 19:52, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp of list 

message: In case anyone wants to verify that all entries in the list are consistent, here's a quick regexp I wrote for this purpose:
 egrep -v '\[\[([^]])+\]\] \[\[Talk:\1| \]\] --'
-- intgr 15:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validation regexp