Talk:Gravel

message: Somebody should make a Cobble article that isn't a disambig. Someone who knows about it at all. --Kevin (TALK)(MUSIC) 03:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cobble

message: Gravel in US is limited by #4 sieve which is 4.75 mm, not 2 mm, as in probably Great Britain?
See Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Veriti (talk • contribs) 21:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like sediments and soils use different scales, as far as I can tell. It's not obvious to me that this is a transatlantic problem, but they certainly turn up often enough. Mikenorton (talk) 22:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Soil classification is made by the International ISO 14688-1:2002 standard. This standard is also approved as European standard EN 14688-1:2002. So why is the article using obsolete references? Read https://www.iso.org/standard/25260.html Välfärd - att färdas väl (talk) 07:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Gravel size

message: Crushed rock used for building roads is often called "blue metal" in Australia.  Its not metal,  is it basalt ?  It is a dark bluish-grey colour.Eregli bob (talk) 08:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue metal 

message: I cannot find a source that agrees with the Breton etymology. The sources provided give the Old French etymology of "gravele" or "gravelle". The Collins dictionary mentions a possible Celtic root, but does not concretely name a source word or language. Wiktionary cites the proto-Celtic *grāwā as the ultimate origin, but I assume this is not a good citation to use. If no citation for the Breton etymology can be found, I recommend that it be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.171.61.32 (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gravel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608071757/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Because I can't find statistics for any other nation. Surely the U.S. is not the only nation that collects statistics on gravel use? But Google Scholar doesn't dredge up (heh) anything for gravel except from the U.S. Geological Survey, which has only U.S. figures. If any editor can find reliable sources for other nations, please add to the "Production and uses" section. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah; found some material. It's a different set of USGS reports. WIll add as I have opportunity. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 18:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S.-centric on production and uses 

message: How is gravel form 2405:201:E033:9A89:2479:3D3:43BC:D968 (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravel