Talk:Nordic Battlegroup

message: How exactly can this Battlegroup work? I mean its got Norway, a country that isn't even in the European Union, yet is apparently part of the EU Battlegroup structure. And then we have Sweden, a Neutral country who is not supposed to become involved in military alliances. I really wonder what kind of legalities would be involved if this Battlegroup were actually called on to go to war. --Hibernian 18:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page is about the article, not its subject. --MrStalker 23:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Because the EU are Imperial. End of. --Kurtle (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can this work? 

message: Anyone else think the map is a bit wonky? If the focus is on Nordic countries, why does the map include all of America with the highlighted countries off on the far right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slacky (talk • contribs) 19:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: It's more appropriate to use the term "raised" rather than "trained" when referring to new units since it is implied that training is constant. --Edward Sandstig 09:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raised vs Trained 

message: Can someone find an OOB for the battlegroup? The Swedish wiki seems to have a one. Could someone translate that? 88.114.76.25 19:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OOB 

message: It is not the Swedish Battalion Commander. The man on the picture is a Major, the Battalion commander is a LtCol, and does not look anything like him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naroz (talk • contribs) 11:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: THE MAN ON THE PICTURE

message: The link redirects you to teh 41. School Battalion(consisting of conscript soldiers) at P4 not the actual 41. Rapid Reaction Battalion(that consists of professional soldiers). The 41. RRBn Should have its own page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naroz (talk • contribs) 11:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The 41. Rapid Reaction Battalion link

message: According to this report the battlegroup's coat of arms has been changed due to objections from "a group of women." The designer of the original emblem objects:
"The army lacks knowledge about heraldry. Once upon a time coats of arms containing lions without genitalia were given to those who betrayed the Crown," said Sagerlund.
Ouch. (So to speak.) McGehee (talk) 21:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Text book example of penis envy.... Mightycord (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's no reason to remove it... Sexual equality? Men are supposed to have their cocks cut off now? --Kurtle (talk) 17:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lion's penis removed from coat of arms

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nordic Battlegroup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090219064254/http://www.mil.se:80/attachments/ifokus04_nr1.pdf to http://www.mil.se/attachments/ifokus04_nr1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified