lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Schismatrix

message: This page was a pale reflection of Shaper/Mechanist.  Redirecting there. Alan De Smet 19:05, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I'd like to add a reciprocal link between this page and either Adam Warren, Studio Proteus, or Dirty Pair pages, reflecting the obvious influence this novel had on Adam Warren's vision of the Dirty Pair universe.  Any objections?
--Sleet01 08:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Adam Warren 

message: I added a section on Ideologies. I think Schismatrix is as much about ideologies as it is the main characters. Certainly it traces Abelard Lindsay's journey from Preservationist ideologue to pragmatic detentiste to post-humanist visionary. Many of the characters are can be taken as exemplars for different ideologies. 
Wellspring 08:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideologies Section 

message: Did a full run on the text of the article. Removing the copy edit request. 
Wellspring 09:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Editing Complete 

message: «At last I can formally tell a skeptical public that the title of SCHISMATRIX is pronounced "Skiz-mat'-rix."  With a short a.  Like "Schismatics," but with an R.  Also, SCHISMATRIX is spelled without a "Z."  I do hope this helps in future.» -- Bruce Sterling, Schismatics Plus, page viii.
N.B.: Sterling is an American, so he would pronounce "schism..." as starting with , not .  Email him if this seems doubtful.
Sean M. Burke (talk) 12:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I added a section on locations within the Schismatrix universe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.139.43.181 (talk) 04:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locations Section 

message: Why is this classed as Importance=low? It was nominated for the nebula award for best novel. It's a seminal text in the genre of "posthuman" fiction, and a very notable work of science fiction. 
202.139.43.181 (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. I removed the low scale without replacement. And besides I repelaced class=stub with class=B, hope this fits. --Cubefox (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance=low?
Talk:Bleaklow

message: Oh dear - how high is bleaklow head? My 1st series OS map supports the 2060 feet  I've always remembered; but some people say 2077 - which just coincidentally is the height of Kinder Low.
Anyone got a second series OS to check the three points
Bleaklow Head
Bleaklow Hill
Bleaklow Stones
I reckon it's Head 2600+; Hill 2600-; Stones 2060.
:633m for Bleaklow Head, 621m Higher Shelf Stones, 628m Bleaklow Stones. No spot height on Bleaklow Hill, but its around 620m. Grinner 10:09, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
Grinner, thanks for the link to my weblog BTW ;-)
--AlanBurlison 12:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I don't think I added it it. But it can stay! Grinner 13:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Helen Mackenzie

message: Notable only as the wife of a notable person.  RickK 20:07, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
* hmm, I'm sort of neutral.  She may be notable in her own right whilst being better known as the wife of someone (Cherie Booth and  Emma Darwin spring to mind), but if not redirect to her husband, and this then might be resurrected later, if appropriate whilst preserving the page's history.  Dunc|☺ 20:17, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yield management

message: Go into the history for this article (not the talk page) and compare the two revisions listed below:
* 22:07, 25 Oct 2004 68.117.57.156 (Yield management system)
* 00:54, 10 Oct 2004 Mat334
Does anyone else feel that my revision is easier to understand than this latest revision? More concise? The changes made by 68.117.57.156 are not incorrect, but they do complicate the article somewhat IMHO. If you agree, please revert it. Mat334 20:20, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Compare?

message: -- Nsevs • Talk 23:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: there is a far too long list of papers. how about the great textbooks of talluri and van ryzin (the theory and practice of revenue management) and phillips (revenue and pricing optimization)?
:I removed everything but links which meet the WP:EL guidelines, to keep it from being a spam repository. Carl.bunderson (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  textbook references 

message: The section about Airlines mentions "AP Restrictions" and uses terms like "20ap" with no explanation of that is an AP Restriction.  I don't know.  Somebody, please fix this. Jmatxx (talk) 11:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  AP Restrictions 

message: That is not a definition. It's mostly a list of attributes: "complex", "multidisciplinary", et al. The bit about it being a "set of yield maximization strategies"... um, what the heck are those? I'm a trained microeconomist and "yield" sounds like something a farmer would attempt. Really, the three conditions under the "Use by industry" section do a far better job of narrowing down what the heck this article is about. 65.211.179.9 (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Kingdom of Laos

message: Kingdom of Laos was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT
Cut & pasted from  which is copyrighted even this is a site of Library of US Congress, as mentioned in bottom of this page. --Ramendra 19:10, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, I moved the discussion from the main VfD page to here. -Vina 20:39, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion

message: The first and second sentence are in apparent contradiction: the Kingdom of Laos was sovereign from 1947 to 1975. yet in 1953 a treaty established a sovereign Laos. Please resolve this. Also, there is only one reference. Two would be better; and more, better still. Rintrah 15:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: Where did this unique design for the Kingdom of Laos' flag come from? The trunks are not curved on the original flags.
The flag embedded on this article is not an accurate representation of the flag of the Kingdom of Laos. In the September 1961 issue of National Geographic National Geographic, September 1961, page 340 there are pictures and descriptions of all the member states of the United Nations at that time. The flag of Laos is displayed on page 340. The graphic uploaded at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3-head-elephant-laos-flag.svg is a closer representation of that flag.
2601:203:4380:DDB0:45E1:A6D2:4C64:785A (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Flag design?
Talk:Vivian Vance

message: There is little here regarding Vance's adult life and career prior to 1951, when she began playing Ethel Mertz on "I Love Lucy.". Surely some further information is available. 2600:6C5D:5A00:B1D:A5C9:AA22:6478:8B4B (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before 1951? 

message: Will the following link be accepted? 
‘I Love Lucy’: Vivian Vance Transformed Herself to Play Ethel תיל"ם (talk) 03:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link
Talk:British Columbia United leadership elections

message: Gordon Gibson became Liberal leader in 1975. AndyL 20:47, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:British Columbia Liberal Party leadership contest, 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Charles Bukowski

message: I'm curious how verifiable is this reference/source of "Martinized" of Bukowski's poems?   I got word the other day that John Martin denies this--so I hope its verifiable to merit legitimate inclusion on this Wiki notable article  Pjt48
:Hello. I've removed the section. It lacked reliable sources. The content shouldn't be restored without reliable sources. StephenMacky1 (talk) 12:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Poetic Controversy
Talk:Diwali

message: deepawali 2023 shubh muhurt Amankumar997 (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 20:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2023 

message: Its deepavali not diwali, change that and keep it as deepavali only, Sanskrit word deepavali is the origin 
Vishalg46512 (talk) 03:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We use the common name rather than classical names (see WP:COMMONNAME). RegentsPark (comment) 14:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: but some countries use deepavali and not diwali 2401:7400:4010:9108:E48D:6388:A82E:51B0 (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Deepavali & Diwali are two different festivals! Wiki get your facts. 49.192.133.130 (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2023 

message: 2409:4071:4D1C:FFD5:0:0:C308:F910 (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2023 (2) 

message: Hi! Respectfully wanted to share that Muslims do not celebrate Deepavali as it is not part of Islamic beliefs. Hope you’ll be able to amend it. Thanks! 58.182.151.84 (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, they do join the festivities. Kleuske (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diwali is not observed by Muslims 

message: Freestockr (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 November 2023
Talk:Eifel Aqueduct

message: First, congratulations on the article, it is really very good! Excelent research job and the pictures are fabulous!
But, for the question: you seem to know a great deal about the Eifel marble. Do you know something about its resistence? Is it used for structural purposes? Ou maybe some personal knowledge about it? Can it be considered truly limestone?
Thanks! -- Poli 05:47, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eifel marble
Talk:Central Lancashire Cricket League

message: I have added the winners of some CLL competitions, from the official handbook, produced by the league. There are some years where no winner was given for competitions. I have left these blank, as it is possible that no competition was held or no team was declared winner.SimonMayer 21:20, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :CLCL. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 15#CLCL until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "CLCL" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sod

message: At the beginning of a prestigious building project there is often a ceremonial occasion attended by local dignitaries. A senior dignitary is often given the honour of Cutting the first sod, marking the official beginning of the project.
Moved this to the talk page. This paragraph refers to the British term "cut the first sod" which is equivalent to the American term "break ground". I don't really think this is in scope for the article.. thoughts? Perel (talk) 22:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First mowing of freshly installed sod

message: I don't see how including an external link to a page that expressly shows you how to install sod yourself without any sales information could be considered vandalism.  Here is the page in question: http://www.evergreenturf.com/do-it-yourself/index.php  70.184.122.73 (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Bentgrass
Kentucky Bluegrass
Rough Bluegrass
Red Fescue
Annual Ryegrass
Perennial Ryegrass  — Preceding unsigned comment added by America First (talk • contribs) 22:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remember these: 

message: Redirecting to Poa doesn't make much sense to me. Same for Poa pratensis, which is probably the actual redirect target, but doesn't really lead to more info about this grass. --70.24.5.195 (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bella Bluegrass

message: A question about the linking of "grass" in sports contexts (mostly within infobox fields) is being discussed at Template talk:Infobox venue#Grass as a surface in sports venues. Around a thousand articles will eventually be affected. – Uanfala (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking "grass" in sports contexts
Talk:United States embargo against Cuba

message: The Economic Impacts of the U.S. embargo on Cuba are the monetary long-term and short-term outcomes that the embargo has had on both countries in relation to trade, industry, and the creation of wealth. The U.S. sanctions on Cuba and their economic impacts can be traced since the beginning of the embargo's implementation up until present time.[1]
According to the United States Chamber of Commerce, the embargo is currently costing the United States economy $1.2 billion per year. The Cuba Policy Foundation (CPF) estimates the current cost of the embargo to be valued at $4.84 billion per year for the United States while costing Cuba $685 million per year.[2] As of today, Cuba is estimated to have lost over $28.6 billion in trade according to Cuba's Institute of Economic Research.[3] The U.S. International Trade Commission estimated that U.S. exporters lose $1.2 billion annually because of the inability to access Cuban markets.[4] Abloom18 (talk) 20:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good use of links to reputable sources to show where you're finding this economic data.  Katherine.Holt (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just added a section of the Economic impacts of the Embargo. Still a work in progress. Let me know what you think! Abloom18 (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic Impacts of the U.S. Embargo on Cuba 
Talk:IEEE 754

message: It lacks many details for professionals.
It lacks simplicity as well.
They can't decide even audience after that many years.
It is really important. Boh39083 (talk) 05:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is hard to make sense of. Can you elaborate a bit, with more context and more specific details? –jacobolus (t) 03:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's really old 

message: Though I agree that an introduction in IEEE 754#History would be useful, there are several issues with what has been added in 1210457800, so that I'm going to revert this change (mainly because of the first point below):
* First, this should be an introduction to the history of the standardization of floating-point arithmetic, not a history on FP arithmetic (there is an article Floating-point arithmetic on this larger subject, with its own history). So, here, it should just be explained what was before IEEE 754 and why standardization was needed.
* In the added text, "non-enumerable" is pointless and misleading: The issue compared to integers is that the considered numbers cannot be represented exactly in general. This is the case even if you restrict to the computable real numbers (which form the subset of  that really matters in computing), which are enumerable (countable), but also just rational numbers.
* Binary representation is not always used.
* The last two sentences are not clear, but anyway, they are not related to the standardization (like the whole paragraph).
* The image is missing, but anyway, it is not related to the standardization either.
* Note that "mantissa" and "de-normal" are not the correct terms (there are also English and typographic mistakes).
BTW, in section History of Floating-point arithmetic, there is a paragraph on the standardization, which could serve as a basis:
— Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Vincent Lefèvre  I agree with your comments. Hopefully there is someone with us able to volunteer a more suitable introductory paragraph? Nsmeds (talk) 12:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to History
Talk:Heaven and Hell (Black Sabbath album)

message: merged stub articles for "Children of the Sea" and "Heaven and Hell (Black Sabbath song)" back into this article — articles aren't really needed for each song — then reorganized, and added stuff. Hopefully this doesn't enrage anyone. / edg ☺ ★ 23:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge and other changes

message: Some interviews about HAH. http://www.rockdetector.com/interviews/artist,1105.sm?id=148 Tenacious D Fan (talk) 20:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another  Tenacious D Fan (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great link 

message: Corrected the part about the bassline, as the verse bassline is essentially the same as that of "Mainline Riders". Listen to the clip on Allmusic from Quartz's compilation Satan's Serenade and it should be pretty obvious. Alternatively, if you've never listened to any Quartz, you're not exactly qualified to comment. [Unregistered User], 27/12/08.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.189.174.225 (talk) 12:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bassline 

message: The blog that is being referred to as a possible use in copyright violation, is in actuality a copy of the wikipedia article!  Not the other way around.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.96.219.135 (talk) 19:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The blog predates the appearance of the relevant material on this article (4 November 2012 ). The article at the time the blog was written bears no resemblance to the blog. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:24, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue 

message: I thought it might be worth mentioning that I deleted a statement in the article's "Artwork" section which implied that Van Halen's choice of cover art on 1984 was inspired by Heaven and Hell's. If someone can verify this, great. Until then, though, the comparison seem inappropriately speculative for an encyclopedia entry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by A7592 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Van Halen's 1984
Talk:Mauritania

message: According to the UN the west Sahara is a disputed territory it is not vandalism but a fact and here is the proof https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt tank you Bitton
--2001:861:E3C3:7F60:DD6E:FB81:6543:D3FD (talk) 19:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: First, that's a poor excuse to inject some political POV into the article (your first edit says everything there is to know about what you want to achieve). Second, the word "disputed" doesn't appear anywhere in that source and besides, Western Sahara has nothing to do with Mauritania (the primary subject). M.Bitton (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case of sahara

message: :There were nine entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone seems to have their favorite to add, sneaking the number to four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*LINKFARM states: 
*ELMIN: . -- 
*ELCITE: 
:Trimmed excessive links.
**Note: Moved from article for possible future consideration
* 
* Mauritania profile from the BBC News.
* 
*Country profile and timeline Conservative Middle East Council
* Forecasts for Mauritania Development  --  Otr500 (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: The etymology section is ambiguous and unclear about how the country got its name from an ancient kingdom with different territories. The ancient kigdom/province of Mauretania was initially in northern Morocco, and expanded later to western and central Algeria. I personally don't understand the etymology of this country, but I know that the French colonisation of the 20th century is strongly related.  TybenFree (talk) 00:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Greatest Hits (Aerosmith album)

message: Is it worth mentioning that this was given free with the purchase of guitar hero: aerosmith bundle pack?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.245.155.177 (talk) 18:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitar Hero: Aerosmith
Talk:Archives (Rush album)

message: (cur | prev) 15:49, 24 August 2012‎ The Evil IP address (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (3,259 bytes) (0)‎ . . (The Evil IP address moved page Archives (Rush album) to Archives (box set): shorten) (undo | thank)
:3LPs is still an album. See Talk:Discovery (Pink Floyd album). In ictu oculi (talk) 13:13, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert old move
Talk:Thrak

message: There is some info on the title of the track "B'Boom" on this page. 66.18.238.120 (talk) 20:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: this album was released on vinyl in 2019 with the fourth side being made up of bonus tracks from the Vroom ep. 
see here on discogs for track listing
https://www.discogs.com/release/14249838-King-Crimson-THRAK
the two following studio albums were also released at the same time in the same format, with bonus tracks making up their fourth sides
perhaps this could be added as an alternate tracklisting? otherwise the text makes no mention of these (relatively recent) vinyl configurations J Edward Malone (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 vinyl release
Talk:Three of a Perfect Pair

message: I'm going to remove the rating for Three for a Perfect Pair since the review is for another album (meaning the rating is probably for that album, not for Three of a Perfect Pair).  SomePersona (talk) 17:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored it. I have no clue what you mean by "the review is for another album" but the allmusic review linked is clearly for Three of a Perfect Pair. RF23 (talk) 09:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  AllMusic 

message: So Trouser Press did not like the album. What about other reviewers ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Beat (King Crimson album)

message: The Sartori in Tangier and Neal and Jack and Me articles are very short stubs and, given their current state, might as well be merged and redirected to this article. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 14:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree 100%. SethTisue (talk) 17:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:Discipline (King Crimson album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Removed a good chunk from the The Sheltering Sky paragraph that, honestly, didn't have anything to do with the song at hand and should have been added to the Beat album. Revert it back, I suppose, if you really want to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.246.249.112 (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's stay on-topic here. 

message: Just a general question about assessments, or reviews, of popular music on Wikipedia: Why do we give a crap what Robert Christgau thinks?--Jelsova (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RC 