lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Power Rangers in Space episodes

message: Again, taking the list from Power Rangers in Space would do a lot to improve this article, which barely describes one episode. FrozenPurpleCube 03:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: Countdown to Destruction has been tagged for various cleanup issues since April 2007, but still doesn't cite a single thrid-party source. Unless someone volunteers to fix this, I propose to merge it here. – sgeureka t•c 15:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of [[Countdown to Destruction]] 

message: References have been made, but the tags and references won't show up under a references section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjawarriordex (talk • contribs) 
:If you're talking about Countdown to Destruction, then consider the problem fixed. – sgeureka t•c 10:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References made but won't show up

message: Does anyone know how to transclude season episode lists? It would be great to transclude this and other Power Ranger seasons into the List of Power Rangers episodes article to replace the bare-bones tables it currently has now.
--Rebel shadow 11:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transclusion proposal 

message: Apparently, the article was not merged properly. So, I am opening up a discussion to see if we can merge Countdown to Destruction to here. With regards to plot summary, it is too long and there is some sources for information, but no production or reception section. Please comment whether you should keep or merge the article here. Thanks. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessary. There's nothing useful in the history of  that warrants any special treatment to be merged properly.—Ryulong (竜龙) 22:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Countdown to Destruction?
Talk:Poincaré residue

message: This page could be improved by discussing residues of connections. Here's a couple resources
* Lecture 25 of http://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~cschnell/mat615/
* https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.tjm/1270215030  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wundzer (talk • contribs) 19:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page improvements 

message: We should merge Poincare residues Residue (Complex Geometry). It turns out that they are the same thing, but the definition on this page is not as broad. Please look at
http://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1975-213-00/S0002-9947-1975-0430297-3/S0002-9947-1975-0430297-3.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.205.224.144 (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree to a large extent, but I do not understand why Draft:Residue (Complex Geometry) is apparently restricted to hypersurfaces in \mathbb P^n.  The article you cite appears to be valid on any complex manifold.  Sławomir Biały (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is how it is constructed in Schnell's notes. There is a generalized construction in Weber's paper, but I have not read through it yet. Would you be willing to read through it and add examples? I want to focus on working on the other paper introducing resultants and residues. But, this is how Griffiths defines the poincare residue. Look at the middle of page 3 onward of http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1982-06-02/S0273-0979-1982-14967-9/S0273-0979-1982-14967-9.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.75.155 (talk) 02:57, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  That looks like a nice paper, in particular for justifying the Poincaré eponym.  But I just discovered Adjunction formula#Poincaré residue, which I think should be a part of this merge discussion, since it appears to provide the generalization that I would like to see included.  Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Redirect from Residue (complex geometry) done. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: What should be done? There should be a link/redirect of Residue (Complex Geometry) to this page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.149.247.87 (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect from Residue (complex geometry) done. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Completed
Talk:Differential of the first kind

message: If you search google books for differentials and "third kind" or "second kind" you find books by Chvalley and Griffiths: they say a meromorphic one-form on a Riemann surface is of the 
1) first kind, if it is holomorphic,
2) second kind, if it has zero residues at each pole
3) third kind if it has only simple poles
Someone should correct/adjust this article it seems.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.230.82.110 (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I am reviewing Jost now, and this is the terminology he uses, too. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistent definitions

message: I'm not an expert in the field but I have few comments to make:
1. Why the article, needs to be titled "Differentials of the first kind", while there is no independent article for the second and the third kind. I think we should change the title to "Abelian Differentials" and put two (or three) sections for each kind. The fact that "Abelian Differential" is redirected to this page is even more reason to do so.
2. The elliptic integral is a special case of hyper elliptic integral and shouldn't be excluded, i.e., degree > 2 and k >= 0.
3. I don't see that integral as the high light of using differentials, while there are essential to cohomology theory for example. I think we have more important stuff to put here.
4. Finally, I agree with above comment, we need to make the definition of the second and third kind obvious in the article instead of a giving a general unrelated description.
I have to give a talk on the differentials of the second kind, after which I'll come back and update the article.
Bossudenotredame (talk) 03:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. What this article currently says does not quite align with standard textbooks. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Article structure
Talk:Kenji Tsumura

message: Hello. According to this link, there are eight players that made into a Pro-Tour Top 8 more than five times - instead of seven, as stated in the introduction. Cheers. 179.179.207.177 (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eight players. 
Talk:Islam during the Yuan dynasty

message: What are the sources referenced? Not enough information is given to find them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbskay (talk • contribs) 14:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: While the Mongols moved Central Asians to become Semu in China and serve as administrators, they did the same thing in reverse in Central Asia, sending Chinese over to administer Bukhara.
SINO-KHITAN ADMINISTRATION IN MONGOL BUKHARA PAUL D. BUELL
page 137
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41930343?seq=17
Rajmaan (talk) 06:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mongols used Chinese to rule Bukhara (in Central Asia) for the same reason they used Central Asian Semus in ruling China 

message: http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/asj/article/download/2401/2279
http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/asj/article/viewFile/2401/2279
http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/asj/article/view/2401/2279
Rajmaan (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim support for rebellion against the yuan dynasty 
Template talk:Islam in China

message: Hi I feel that those figures should be left out since the template lists "major figures" in the history of Islam in China, and Editingman has not provided any reason why they are important figures in the history of Islam in China besides "I think they are important". 
For example, Hui Liangyu a Communist official who is supposed to be officially atheist, Ma Bufang a Kuomintang warlord whose career ended in a scandal trying to force his niece to be one of his concubines, and Lan Yu a Ming dynasty general who happened to be Muslim. These individuals, other than the fact they were of Hui background do not really stand out as being notable figures in the history of Islam in China compared to figures like Liu Zhi, an Islamic scholar who wrote on Islam and Confucian philosophy. Abstrakt (talk) 23:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi I feel that those figures should not be removed since these are influential or important people from the minority Muslim community and are thus appropriate in the sectioned named "major" figures. For example, Ma Bufang, a Hui, was a warlord who rule the province of Qinghai, that is why he is important. So what has his crimes got to do with his influence? The communist official, who is also a Hui, happens to be the vice-premier of China and that is why he is important. Lan Yu is a Ming Dynasty general who ended Mongol attempts to reconquer China, which is quite important and yes, that they are Muslim matter because the section should be about Major Figures of Islam in China.Editingman (talk) 05:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major figures 

message: -The Dungan are ethnic Hui whose ancestors fled to Central Asia and the Panthay are ethnic Hui whose ancestors fled to Myanmar. These two groups are currently living outside the borders of the PRC, if they were in the PRC still, they would be counted as members of the Hui ethnic group.Abstrakt (talk) 01:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The title is about Islam and China, so Chinese Muslims who fled are relevant. Just to clarify, the is about China, not necessarily the PRC. Editingman (talk) 03:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dungan/Panthay 

message: I see that the issue was raised back in 2008. I think military officers shouldn't be included or any other individual that is not strictly a religious figure or wasn't influential on the development of the religion in a certain region. Therefore, I suggest we remove these individuals:
* Hu Dahai, 14th-century military officer
* Hui Liangyu (b. 1944), the state official in the People's Republic of China
* Ma Anliang (1855–18), military officer
* Ma Buqing (1901–77), military officer
* Ma Fuxiang (1876–32), military officer
* Ma Gui (1543–17), military officer
* Yeheidie'erding (d. 1312), an architect
* Zheng He (1371–35), the state official in the Imperial China
--Governor Sheng (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major figures (2)
Talk:Ultra sheer

message: I know this article is currently a stub, but in expanding it I think there should be an explanation given whether "ultra sheer" fabric is only ever used in practice for sexual purpose or not. Without this and with the current only image being one that has sexual weight (a sexual pose and look and visible genitalia and women's chest), there seems to be an implicit message to a reader "that ultra sheer fabric is only for sexual purpose". Wallby (talk) 15:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual image but no proof given that "ultra sheer" is only used for sexual purpose
Talk:Howwood railway station

message: Just something that crossed my mind while updating this page: some time ago this page was moved from Howwood railway station to Howwood (Renfrewshire) railway station to avoid confusion with How Wood (Hertfordshire) railway station, but is it really necessary? Howwood railway station now redirects to How Wood railway station which now is a disambig page. Both station articles have a link to the other at the top of each article, so can't we just have this article at Howwood railway station and the other at How Wood railway station, with Not to be confused with Howwood station in Renfrewshire or whatever at the top? --- Dreamer 84 12:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree entirely. The disambig page is not necessary and neither are the (Renfrewshire) & (Hertfordshire) disambiguators in the article titles. The "not to be confused with" links at the top of each article adequately cater for anybody who has reached the wrong one. –Signalhead < T > 19:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Touchdown polymerase chain reaction

message: Is the origin of the name Touchdown PCR known?
Ian Glenn 03:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably it comes from the "touchdown" effect caused by the slowly decreasing annealing temperature.  The primers bind the DNA more slowly and controlled than at a high annealing temperature in a gentle touchdown... I guess it would say in  but I cant access the full article. - Zephyris Talk 11:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well got hold of the paper, to quote: "The annealing temperature of the reaction is decreased 1 °C (in this example) every second cycle from 65°C to a 'touchdown' at 55 °C, at which temperature 10 cycles are carried out." Not much of an answer really... - Zephyris Talk 11:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reduction in temperature does not necessarily have to be every 2 cycles, nor does it necessarily need to be by 1 degree celsius.  I routienly use a touchdown PCR that drops the annealing temperature by 1 degree every cycle for 10 cycles.  Perhaps the article should be less specific about actual parameters.  As quoted from the paper "The annealing
temperature of the reaction is decreased 1 °C (in this example)
every second cycle from 65°C to a 'touchdown' at 55 OC, at which
temperature 10 cycles are carried out."  Note the bit about "(in this example)."
:Okay, thanks. I'll edit the article accordingly.--Seans Potato Business 15:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Procedure Specifics

message: Does the sentence "The primer will anneal at the highest temperature which is least-permissive of nonspecific that it is able to tolerate." make sense to you? I don't understand it; is it missing punctuation or something? --Seans Potato Business 15:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sentence makes no sense
Talk:Royal Australian Engineers

message: i have a fairly comprehensive handout of the history of the RAE, but im not sure on layout and making major edits.--Kommando 05:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: G'day, I have removed the following text from the page as I couldn't find a reference for it:
I have placed it here in the hope that some can find a reference for it, so it can be added back in later (if there is consensus to do so). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed information
Talk:Pedro Alcántara Herrán

message: first off, am very appreciative that someone wrote this article. it is very good overall, just the last paragraph isn't making sense:
--------
Due to the fact that the civil war that started in 1839 had escalated and spread to the Northern provinces, General Alcántara commissioned General Caycedo to lead the government troops in the northern campaign. Thus, Juan de Dios Aranzazu, President of the “Consejo de Estado” assumed the presidency from July 5, until October 19, 1841, when General Caycedo returned to the presidency. General Alcántara returned triumphant to Bogotá on May 19, 1842, and is sworn in as President.
--------
what is the "Consejo de Estado?" is that a different presidency from that of Colombia? and if General Caycedo led the government troops, why couldn't he be sworn in as president? just would like to get this more clear, thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulkon (talk • contribs) 19:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  last paragraph on the swearing in is confusing
Talk:Domingo Caycedo

message: I have corrected the spelling of Domingo Caicedo's last name and the place of his death after further research in Google Colombia, Spanish Wikipedia and lablaa. Please see http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domingo_Caicedo_y_Santa_Mar%C3%ADa and http://www.lablaa.org/blaavirtual/biografias/caycdomi.htm. --Grancafé (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting inaccuracies 

message: I've made some simple grammatical changes to improve the article. However, I'm not sure the maintenance template should be removed. Ardenter (talk) 17:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Fixes
Talk:Typhoon Isa

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Congrats --Shruti14 t c s 22:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Typhoon Keith (1997) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 03:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:South Hill, Virginia

message: Does south hill have a dmv 2603:6080:D000:6F00:45A3:ACFB:5D0A:C4F6 (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does south hill have a dmv
Talk:Sturgeon Lake Caldera

message: Could someone please make this easier to read?  It is very hard for me (not an expert in geology) to understand the terminology.  Thanks!  222.235.44.169 (talk) 08:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Geology does not normally use simple terminology and this encyclopedia is not Simple English to start with. Such simple English should be found at the Simple English Wikipedia. BT (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Try adding Wikilinks to more words. There is a setting (if you create a profile here) that will load a thumbnail of a page when you hover over a wikilink, it's handy for defining things without opening a new window or tab. Firefox also has a variety of dictionary extensions to define words quickly, if that is the browser you use. vıdıoman 01:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been wanting to recreate this page for awhile anyway so I might be able to make things more tidy. There is a bit of information for this volcano not added in the article. BT (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Check this out for example. BT (talk) 02:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Language
Talk:Jim Beach

message: The article has been marked generally as needing citations for almost every statement since 2016. Until I took them out just now, there were separate tags on every sentence, which made it look ridiculous. But if you know of some rule that says that that level of tagging is desirable please feel free to put them back. That said, is any of this stuff actually citeable? Because if not, after being tagged that long, should they just not come out? Cheers DBaK (talk) 09:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Please remove "; including Matilda" as no official page exists.
Cheers Jack M E 01 (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Template talk:Texas State Senate

message: User:Frietjes Has constantly removed the senate seal from the template, under the claims it makes it too big. But that's not true. As you can see from these two screen-shots (1, 2), adding the seal simply moves the names over to the left more. There is so much space between the names without the seal, that there is plenty of room to spare. Frietjes, please give a better reason for it to be excluded. Fry1989 eh?  22:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: try viewing the template on a narrow display.  the primary purpose of a navigation template is for navigation.  decorative images do not assist with navigation and reduce the space available for the actual navigation content. Frietjes (talk) 15:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I use both narrow and wide displays. We do not cater to people with a certain type of display over others. If we did, you would be removing these images from all navigation templates, but you are not doing so. These templates are not being treated as "galleries for decorative images", and you know that. A gallery has plenty of images, these templates only have a single directly related image added to them. Fry1989 eh?  20:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can we choose a place for a centralized discussion rather than copying and pasting the threads on several different talk pages?  How about Template talk:Massachusetts State Senators or really anywhere is fine, so long as it is in one place. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Centralized Discussion Here Fry1989 eh?  04:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senate Seal image
Talk:MAP

message: I believe MAP also stands for the US "Military Assistance Program" which gives weapons and etc to countries such as Indonesia in the East Timor conflict. Not 100% sure on this, though. Rob1n 03:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Assistance Program? 

message: A solvent extraction method used to selectively extract compounds developed by Environment Canada —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.97.58.55 (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microwave Assisted Processing?
Talk:Festac Town

message: Retain festac for the festival, you can actually merge Festac town with the Festival for Black Arts which occurred in 1977, It was called Festac 77. Also the word festac should not be about 419, I mean the importance is more about the festival than anything else, the town though may be a different subject.
* Hi! Information has to be referenced on Wikipedia, so in order to talk about non-419 stuff we need to find reliable sources. The good news is that there should be info available from the net's RSes that could tell us about Festac. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jrockley

message: This is the second RfA in a week that looks to be doomed by a bad answer. I encourage the candidate to withdraw the candidacy and return in three months, by which time the concerns expressed here will likely be gone. The only protected pages you should want to edit are the ones transcluded onto the main page; any other answer makes people very nervous. Xiner (talk) 16:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answer to Q1
Talk:Movilla Abbey

message: Corrected co-ordinates.  I occasionally get caught out by (what I still think of as) the new editor where you have to cancel a preview to edit your edit description, even though you’re pressing an identical button that got you to the edit summary the first time.  ⚜ Moilleadóir ✍ 03:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Co-ords
Talk:Ted Wilson (mayor)

message: I was looking something about Utah, and I stumbled upon this article. I wikified it, for the sake of it, but in that process I came to think that it looked like some copied a campaign ad and pasted it without even looking at the result. So I added the "this reads like an advertisement" template. A sentence like "A favorite hobby is watching Utah’s future" is a spin doctor's phrase if there even was one. I can't actually edit the data as I don't know anything about that Mr Wilson, but this article, as it is now, could be summed up as "Vote for him!", even though he's not running for anything at present, as far as I know. Eje211 09:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment is outdated (2007), stale, inaccurate, and should be removed. 136.38.71.221 (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This reads like a campaign ad
Talk:The Century (apartment building)

message: See Talk:The Dakota#Requested move for a discussion about using "the" in the name of an article about an apartment building in NYC's :Category:Central Park West Historic District.See also Talk:The Dakota#Request for comment which has a slightly different focus. --Enkyo2 (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the building