lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Psycho (1998 film)

message: now I don't want to sound like a pervert, but in the stabbing scene one can also see at least one of Heche's breasts (several times actually). Did't know if this was important enough to put in the main article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.115.11 (talk) 09:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  nudity in the shower scene (another difference 

message: Taken from "Differences between the 1998 and 1960 versions": 
When Lila Crane discovers the body of Norman Bates' mother, several white doves suddenly fly up. As birds are a recurring motif in the movie, with Norman's hobby of stuffing dead birds, the sudden unexpected appearance of live birds here may symbolize the approaching end of Norman's presence in the motel.
Two problems: One, I have no clue which one the doves fly up from. Two. May. I say it may symbolize him going to have a cheeseburger. See the problem? -Babylon pride (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  May, may, may... 

message: Thankfully someone else corrected differences section which incorrectly listed the cutaway shots during Arbogast's death.  However, my original question remains: isn't the reclining naked woman shot from the Nine Inch Nails video for "Closer"?  Or, at the very least, isn't it a deliberate reference to the video?  I'm unable to find sources but was hoping someone who edits this page frequently could confirm/deny. Clockster (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences 

message: Why and when was it removed? Sean 18:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences 

message: Cannot see Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates. Totally miscast. 2601:248:5480:D80:952B:18A:D7F:E0A4 (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  harrietmeaders@gmail.com
Talk:The Talented Mr. Ripley

message: It's been awhile since I read the novel, but the film made some changes and this plot summary seems to have incorporated some of those, in particular Marge's expanded role. Can someone who has read it more recently take a crack at trimming this section? — TAnthonyTalk 05:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: 'Greenleaf' or 'Dickie' in the same or adjacent sentences is very confusing - one person or two? Father or son?
89.168.93.79 (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name confusion

message: In the book, Tom as Dickey does not go to Venice, but to Sicily--etc. Please read the book before you write the summary!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gr5959 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This plot describes the film, not the book 

message: This is incorrect: "Tom begins to grow jealous of Freddie, and grows closer to Marge over their shared anguish in Dickie's shifting loyalty." Tom dislikes Freddie Miles from their first meeting, but it's only a brief encounter. Miles doesn't become significant until later when he is murdered by Tom. Tom was never close to Marge and could barely conceal his dislike of her throughout the novel. He was disgusted by Dickie's affection towards her, even repulsed by the sight of her underclothes drying on the line, and actively interfered in their relationship. 108.35.76.64 (talk) 19:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom's feelings towards Marge
Talk:Ishaqi massacre

message: The top of this article is an exact copy from here, which was cited by the initial author at the end. Joshdboz 00:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a few changes. Please feel free to keep paraphrasing — it's still very rough. — JEREMY 06:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

message: C'mon -- people -- where are the photos!!?!?!--Mofomojo 06:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs! 

message: incident?!? massacre!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.59.87.92 (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incident? 
Talk:Danny Whitten

message: should we have something about the neil young song "my my hey hey" which is partially about danny whitten
:If you can find a reference supporting the claim, yup, please do :) Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 23:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His cardboard box is in my possession as well as his death certificate. 2603:6010:D843:DA00:7DC7:21D0:BC4C:BB54 (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm listening to Rust Radio right now -- Neil Young concerts streamed on the weekends -- and just heard Neil introduce the song Winterlong as being for Danny Whitten.  Concert is 2008-02-18, RAI Theater, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Apparently he did that more than once -- comment at http://www.songmeanings.net/songs/view/80420/#73015863410 (by winterlong 02-27-2011) said he heard Neil do that "at Hammersmith Apollo concert a couple of years ago."  From Sugar Mountain, that would have been either 3/8/08 or 3/15/08 concert in London.
And I don't know what that's all about, maybe someone else can pick up the thread.
--76.248.10.207 (talk) 02:37, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winterlong 
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (ALL CAPS)

message: per Manual of Style (trademarks):
:Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner encourages special treatment:
:* avoid: REALTOR®
:* instead, use: Realtor
:* but, don't invent new formats: MCI is standard, not "Mci".
~ Booya Bazooka 00:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademarks

message: Where is this guideline discussed? I can't find any broad discussion anywhere. No one seems to dislike this guide; shouldn't we just add it somewhere and have it in place as an offical MoS guide? Unless we do that, not much discussion will follow, I'm afraid. Shinobu 16:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to participate as well, as the Japan-related articles usually use them at all times (see Talk:Zard#Survey. -- ReyBrujo 22:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It should be discussed and edited here until it's in a state that all contributors are happy with, and then brought up at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) for broader discussion. -Quiddity 02:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I typed up a little note here, when a few minutes later I found this. bleh. - Zero1328 Talk? 10:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion?

message: While I'm sure the title of this MOS entry is witty, the fact remains that it is about capitalization. For comprehensiveness, it should be merged with Manual of Style (capital letters), to keep all information about capitalization in the same place. >Radiant< 11:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --Quiddity 17:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (Assuming Radiant has also read Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (emphasis)) Okay, to MoS:CAPS it will go then, providing the content of the guideline is kept. By the way, it would be nice to run this by Richard too - common courtesy. Although I might imagine his objections to putting this guide under MoS:CAPS rather than MoS:EMPH would be considerably less, I think I would still want to hear his opinion before a merge is conducted. Shinobu 23:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

text: *No objection to that, but who is Richard? >Radiant< 15:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably , the user who created this proposal. --Elonka 17:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: *I'm pretty sure he's aware since he's the one who has just merged this page. >Radiant< 17:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I left a note on his talk page. Since he conducted the merge, I take it that he wholeheartedly agrees. I'm glad everything is official now, and that everyone is happy with the result. No more ALL CAPS (I'm so relieved). Shinobu 13:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Bedwetting alarm

message: The abstract uses the term 'misbehaviour' (almost certainly inappropriate as bedwetting is virtually always involuntary) and 'punishment' (which could be technically appropriate --I don't know-- but there is probably a connotation-neutral term (along the lines of 'alarm'?) which would be even more appropriate). —Christian Campbell 18:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Misbehaviour' and 'punishment'
Talk:Chilliwack Bruins

message: Fair use rationale completed. Flibirigit (talk) 05:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Chilliwackbruins.JPG
Talk:Habbakuk (Dragonlance)

message: Does the other uses section pertain to this Habbukuk? The one specifically used in Dragonlance, I mean.  If it doesn't, it shouldn't be here. DoomsDay349 01:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but don't just delete it, move that to the right article, or create new articles for that information. If necessary, create a disambiguation page. -- ReyBrujo 01:16, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ......err....sorry.  I...sort of already deleted it.  It won't happen again, again, very sorry. DoomsDay349 00:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Uses

message: I can't find his debut for the infobox, perhaps someone else can? Thanks.  DoomsDay349 20:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debut
Talk:List of Klezmer bands

message: this is the first (possibly only?) page I have created that is no longer a stub.  Awesome. Ecoli 01:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Transfered from this edit by User:68.77.1.234, the not unreasonable question:
:One "less famous" klezmer bandleader wonders who has determined this hierarchy--and really cares that they are listed as "more famous" than one of their distinguished contemporaries.
Clearly as Wikipedia is not a directory listings, not every group should be included and the threshold is one of WP:Notability - presumeably one criteria is that the group is notable enough to deserve/have its own article. More problematic is "More" and "Less" famous - on what criteria (relevant is WP:Neutral point of view) ?  Other than that, the listings should be in alphabetical order in order for there to be no perceived bias. David Ruben  Talk  01:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the separation and ordered them. Now someone can review them and see whether they are all notable. --Mbimmler 16:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I know of a great (in my opinion) klezmer band from Krakow, by the name of Di Galitzyaner Klezmorim. They don't have a Wikipedia article about them, but I think they deserve being mentioned on this page. What are your thoughts?
*http://www.klezmorim.pl/
*http://www.myspace.com/digalitzyanerklezmorim
DrJorin (talk) 17:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No Wiki article, no mention.  There have been entirely too many bands listed just 'cause someone thought they were good or important.  Where would it end? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 23:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Di Galitzyaner Klezmorim 

message: I've once again cleaned out some of the red links to bands with no wikipedia article.  I feel bad deleting the bunch of Argentinean ones, but please create articles for them if they you think they are worth including.  Also, I'm not sure about "gypsy-punk-fusion" bands and to what degree they have to play klezmer to be included in this list.  Therefore I deleted some but not others. Dan Carkner (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Hallo! siege google:Kaschauer Klezmer Band. Gruß
no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיק פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndik preferentsn talk contribs 06:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kaschauer Klezmer Band]] 

message: Hi! Please see google:Jerusalem Klezmer Band for Jerusalem Klezmer Band. Thanks in advance!
no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיק פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndik preferentsn talk contribs 07:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jerusalem Klezmer Band]]
Talk:Black Mist Scandal (Japanese politics)

message: Why specify "(Japanese Politics)"? Is there is any other "Black Mist Scandal"? --OGoncho 06:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is, according to Black Mist Scandal. The other one is about baseball. - Bobet 19:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Template talk:Texas/Archive 2

message: Why are the names (or portions of names) of some of the MSAs bolded? -Acjelen 21:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are bolded because these are major cities with a population of over 500,000. —RJN 01:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSA 

message: I would like to suggest to include all Texas counties on the template. That way one will not have to look any further to find more information. (Eddie 01:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There were several discussions on including counties in the past and the results were not to include them on this template.  See the talk archive of several discussions and concensuses.  Other states can include counties because they don't have that many, but Texas has 254. If you are curious to see what the template looks like with counties included, click here.—RJN 01:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counties 

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 23:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of state templates 

message: did all this work.  got all the msa on there.  but some were not there.  yall can figure out what you want to do with it (edit page)
:I propose that all the cities without a metropolitan page would just retain their city page link as the separate links per city are not appropriate with the section, "Metros" NThomas76207 (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metro Areas 

message: 15-Dec-2007: As the nav-box Template:Texas continues to be expanded with more cities or topics, and transcluded into more articles, the Wikipedia indexing is becoming a so-called "N-squared problem" or more accurately an "NxM (N-by-M) problem": when 2,500 articles use a nav-box having 200 wikilinks, the overall effect generates 500,000 entries into the Wikipedia index-file database: the seemingly small nav-box (with just 200 city/region names and topics) snowballs into a massive half-million entries in the Wikipedia link-files database.
The problem is encouraged because some people treat nav-box templates as being shared subroutines or common menus, but they are not: in MediaWiki language 1.6, nav-box templates are actually copied as multiple instances for each page when used, rather than implemented as a shared common routine.  If just 10 pages use a nav-box linking 150 cities/regions, that's 1,500 index entries, and the current result has become the thousands of index entries already created by Template:Texas. Solutions are being implemented to avoid the growing nav-box index crisis, as discussed below. -Wikid77 (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nav-box index crisis
Talk:Greater Houston/Archive 2

message: Thinking of changing name to Houston Metropolitan Area.  Greater Houston, although correct, lacks a certain formality that exists in most reference publications.  And, for continuity sake, Wikipedia lists most other metro areas as "City" Metropolitan Area, not Greater "City".  Nsaum75 16:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

message: :1. The center of Beaumont-Port Arthur is east-northeast of Greater Houston.  
:2. Beaumont-Port Arthur states this region is in Southeast Texas.
:3. Greater Houston states this region is in East Texas.
Therefore, as far as ordinal and cardinal directions are concerned:
* East is south of southeast.
* Southeast is north of east.
I now understand why university students cannot use wikipedia for research papers. stonetlee 16:04, 8 Aug 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Observations

message: I didn't read the whole article, but this first line of the "Economy" section stuck out because it wasn't immediately clear whether it is the most populous area globally, nationally or locally.  Someone care to check? Narxysus 05:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the reference. I updated the rating also to match the latest reference. Postoak 06:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Among the 10 most populous metro areas"
Talk:Bimini Road

message: There are sources   claiming that many stones were dredged up in 1920's. I added the latter to the external links, but it's an important detail to include in the main body of the article once someone could find a reliable source to back it up firmly. Logos (talk) 11:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dredged up stones 

message: Totally confusing jargon:
 reported dates of 2780±70 (UM-1359), 3500±80 (UM-1360), and 3350±90 (UM-1361) from whole-rock samples; a date of 3510±70 (UM-1362), from shells extracted from the beachrock core; and dates of 2770±80 (UM-1364) and 2840±70 (UM-1365) 
First, do these numbers refer to AGES or DATES? Seems they are AGES, but the term "dates" is used. Important difference. 
Second, what is all the UM stuff? Needs clarification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.150.56 (talk) 12:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarity regarding age 
Talk:Battle of Levounion

message: The Seljuk Turks according to the following source:
Haldon, John. Byzantium at War 600 - 1453. New York: Osprey, 2000. 
were a combatant, on the side of the Pechenegs. So I shall include. Tourskin 04:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seljuk Turks 

message: Considering that the Pechenegs were wiped out, I do not see how this has any significance with Russian History, so I got rid of that.Tourskin 05:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian history?
Talk:Transylvanian Memorandum

message: Do not use the fantasy books of official paid war-propagandist Seton-Wattson as references. All of his family lived from paid state-financed paropaganda before and after the war.
Robert William Seton-Watson (August 20, 1879–July 25, 1951), commonly referred to as R.W. Seton-Watson, he also used the pseudonym Scotus Viator, was a British historian who also played an active role in encouraging the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire during and after World War I.[1] In 1917-1918, Seton-Watson served on the Intelligence Bureau of the War Cabinet in the Enemy Propaganda Department where he was responsible for British propaganda to the Austrian and Hungarian peoples. [2] His son was Hugh Seton-Watson, who also became involved in propaganda in the 1970s with the Institute for the Study of Conflict.
:Despite, he may be referred as a reliable source and a support for an opinion etc. see, WP:RS. However In case you consider any of his source is citing a clear fiction, explain here or present any source for that, so we may discuss in case.(KIENGIR (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree with KIENGIR, you are welcome to bring your own sources that tackle the subject (the electoral irregularities in the Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen between 1867 and 1918) and clarify (with independent, NPOV sources) why do you think that the facts presented by Seton-Watson are fantasy and propaganda. Mentatus (talk) 07:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Regtraht, this I think we understand, however you have to show something that would tell us what did not happen or happened in a different way as it is now described, or at least present something particular regarding the electoral subject in Hungary that time, otherwise we cannot do much of your concern.(KIENGIR (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

text: Regtraht, I see, I never debated Seton-Watsons overexaggerations and less objectivity comparing to other states, since Hungary was a top liberal state on those times, however given the fact Hungary introduced the first minority laws, she was the first pool as well regarding appliance, given the chance to debate and handle a phenomenon of treating minority rights and demands on a higher level, along with all the positive and negative distractions of it. I see no other chance as I referred, in a new pharagraph discuss - maybe aftermath/evaluation/critics section - where along with something related material what you presented here may be summarized. I.e. Grigore Moldovan's open response/reaction to the Memorandum as a Transylvanian Romanian may do it.(KIENGIR (talk) 00:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not use the books of the official war propagandist Seton-Watson as references
Talk:Lee Demarbre

message: someone needs to update this page. he's made a movie called "smash cut" recently and premiered it at the mayfair theatre last month. it stars sasha grey and the guy from last house on the left. much of the filming took place in ottawa and includes locations like the bytowne theatre and the mayfair theatre itself.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.37.176.218 (talk • contribs) 
:Smash Cut was already mentioned in the article - updated for past tense now. The article on the movie itself contains the essential gory details. Dl2000 (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pat Summerall

message: This article needs to mention something about Sumerall's talents, e.g. his characteristic passive but exciting play-by-play style as an announcer. ChaChaFut 02:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Except there's no available free photo of him available on Wikipedia. Just because you found a good photo off the Internet doesn't mean that it can be used here. ZappaOMati 03:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Design for X

message: * The design for X guidelines are not pretty well alocated. There is another problem. Some design guidelines belong to different plc stages/phases.
* It would be greatly welcome if design guidelines from a) other country related standardization boards are added, e.g. American Society of Civil Engineers , b) industry standard setter.
Regardless of the referenced article, the X does NOT stand for Excellence. That is purely a marketing term, born out of the Great Excellence Consultant Hoards of the 80s and 90s. Please stop propogating this ignorance. The X stands, as also stated in the referenced article as a mathmematical reference, ie; 'whatever' or a number of types of "Design for". I am removing this reference, if you disagree, discuss here. Ken (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So where is your more authoritative source? — Dgtsyb (talk) 15:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll just have to leave it as is as i do not have the time to research this further and the misstatement appears to have been propagated almost to the ends of the known earth..... while I highly disagree with the x=excellent drivel, i choose to pick my battles myself and I will leave it for now. cheers Ken (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: other tasks