Talk:Righteous indignation

message: Deleted by anon in 2014.
:The Forerunner Commentary on Psalms 137:2 argues that these psalms are about the "bitterness of exile into which God forced Judah", purportedly with the goal of turning grief into zeal, so that the "anger can be used to scour away sin" by becoming "righteously indignant". In Richard T. Ritenbaugh's comments on Proverbs 15:18 in How to Survive Exile, he argues that it "is alright for us to be righteously indignant as long as we do not sin."  In McCosh's book Motive Powers, he notes that "We may be angry and sin not; but this disposition may become sinful, and this in the highest degree. It is so when it is excessive, when it is rage, and makes us lose control of ourselves. It is so, and may become a vice, when it leads us to wish evil to those who have offended us. It is resentment when it prompts us to meet and repay evil by evil. It is vengeance when it impels us to crush those who have injured us. It is vindictiveness when it is seeking out ingeniously and laboriously means and instruments to give pain to those who have thwarted us. Already sin has entered."
Deleted by editor in 13 September 2012.
:St. Thomas Aquinas, in the question on anger of his Summa Theologiae, quotes the Opus Imperfectum in Matthaeum, "he that is angry without cause, shall be in danger; but he that is angry with cause, shall not be in danger: for without anger, teaching will be useless, judgments unstable, crimes unchecked," and concludes saying that "to be angry is therefore not always an evil."ST, II-II, Q. 158, a. 1, sed contra.
;references 
93.80.229.75 (talk) 07:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: restored deleted paragraphs

message: * Google books for righteous indignation including Righteous Indignation: Religion and the Populist Revolution. 
93.80.229.75 (talk) 07:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: further reading

message: I am a little surprised that there is no mention of the ship's name from "Bucky O'Hare". Not notable enough? Merleblue (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about the ship name? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Righteous indignation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Topical.show/RTD/cgg/ID/729/Righteous-Indignation.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Old Tesstament commentary" starting with Paul's letter to the Ephesians? Clearly out of place. The other references for "Old Testament commentary, the Forerunner Commentary and James McCosh are obscure and outside the mainstream of contemporary scholarship. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 00:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Testament Bible commentary 

message: To me, this really just sounds like a section on resentment. Hopefully, someone could make a redirect to resentment, and include all this info as a subsection (I have no idea how to do this, currently; and I would want consensus, if I was going to do this).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Robot 2020 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect with resentment