Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Review

message: Does anyone else think it would be worthwhile to add in instructions on how to use the automatic peer reviewer?--Supernumerary 01:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you know how, right? Cbrown1023 02:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Natch!--Supernumerary 03:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Auto PR

message: Would anyone object to me marking what articles that we peer-reviewed that went on to achieve GA or FA status? It's already mentioned in the next newsletter, so people who click through would be wondering which made the cut.--Supernumerary 03:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with that. Cbrown1023 20:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA

message: The Peer review page has been changed. It now automatically lists peer reviews in the peer review category, but does not list other peer reviews. WikiProjects such as this have several ways to respond to this change.
# You can modify your template so that film PR requests are automatically added to the general PR category: this requires you to add redirects from the PR subpages to the film PR subpages. I've done this with three recent reviews.
# You can add by hand some film PR requests to the peer review category, by providing a redirect from the PR subpage to the film PR subpage. This requires fewer redirects. 
# You can list film PR requests on the PR page in a separate section.
# You can have a separate section on the PR page devoted to film peer reviews.
I've implemented option 3. Option 4 sounds similar, but involves actually transcluding the peer reviews onto the PR page, not just the links. Please contact me if this is your preference, as it requires some additional work to set up. The other two options should be more straightforward, but let me know if you have any queries. Geometry guy 21:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we may need to evaluate peer reviews related to WikiProject Films to ensure a consistent connection.  Girolamo, are you familiar with this structure?  There appears to be some inconsistencies in how some of the peer reviews are presented, mainly differences in the titling and location (such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Peer review/Mulholland Drive (film) vs. Wikipedia:Peer review/You Only Live Twice (film)/archive1, both live and recent PRs). —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I must admit that I never got wind of this, since I was offline for most of the month of December - I guess I didn't catch up to everything like I thought I did! But it is good to have this brought up, since I have been meaning to ask whether our PR is adequate in its current state. I've been doing redirects by hand, but I must admit that I feel that the WikiProject PR is currently inferior to the general PR process, due to our lack of bots, and the fact that our PRs never go on the general page, while the film-related ones on the general page are transcluded (by me by hand) onto our page. Maybe option 4 would be best? All comments on the matter would be welcome. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection with [[WP:PR]] 

message: If an article passes WP GA, do I change this project's rating to GA on the article's talk page? ~SunDragon34 (talk) 05:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. :)  The instructions at WP:GAN are pretty clear about this.  Also, if a film article becomes a Good Article, it can be added to WikiProject Films's Spotlight. —Erik (talk • contrib) 13:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review? 

message: Is there a point in nominating articles for A-class review here, or is that process dormant? I ask due to the large numbers of failures for lack of response in 2009. Regards,  Skomorokh  06:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A-Class has been deprecated by the project, hence is being removed from this page. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the swift response, Collectonian. Mahalo,  Skomorokh  15:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-class review: active? 

message: A mid-importance article supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers that was reviewed by Version 1.0 Editorial Team and selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions. The article has come a long way from a fan boy mish mash to a fair enough GA. Now is the time to take it to the next level. Currently it's going through another peer review. Please, lend a hand. Aditya(talk • contribs) 10:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with Peer Review needed: [[Jayne Mansfield]] 

message: I was looking for general guidelines on how much detail from reviews it was appropriate to include in film-related articles, had a random stab at WP:FILMREV, and ended up on this page. I eventually found what I wanted at MOS:FILMCRITICS. It might be helpful to add a hatnote to this page to guide future editors. GrindtXX (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote?