lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Sherard

message: It has been said that Sherard is:
* an illegitimate son of the last Earl of Harborough
* the son of Rev. Bennet Sherard Kennedy
It has also been said that he is the great grandson of William Wordsworth.
Sherard's works on Wilde have been attacked for his looseness with the truth; possibly he took the same approach when it came to details of his own ancestry.  Does anyone have access to some proper research on Sherard's origins? · Stumps 10:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father
Talk:Huron Wind

message: The article states there are five wind turbines yet the picture shows six.
If you follow the link to the official page, you find the relevant discussion: http://www.huronwind.com/huronwind/hw_pdfs/34.pdf which is in a nutshell, OPG owns the 6th, and is not part of the "Huron Wind" project.  OPG's also looks a little different.
Jok2000
I corrected the claim that Huron was the first commercial wind farm in Canada. Hydro-Québec's Matane station predates it by nearly five years --scruss 03:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page badly needs updating.  Our family visited the Bruce Power Station last week.  There are now over 100 wind turbines in the vicinity, with more being built. Slh1078 (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: stump
Talk:The War of the Simpsons

message: One of the plot points in Jean Renoir's 1945 film, "The Southerner" (usually thought of as his most successful American picture), involves a feud between the eponymous poor Southern farmer (or was it his children?) and a neighbor, over who will catch a giant catfish, "old Lead Pencil."  If I remember correctly, there may be some dispute in the film whether Lead Pencil really exists.  I had always assumed Renoir's giant catfish was one of the inspirations for General Sherman, but can't find any support for this theory at, e.g., SNPP's episode capsule.  Does anyone else agree? Kmbush40 11:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Southerner"
Talk:KSTP (AM)

message: IN the first graf, it's noted that KSTP is a clear-channel station.  However, KSTP is NOT clear-channel - it's directional westward at night.  There's another station at 1500 (in Philadelphia, if memory serves).  
I think that assertion is in error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchberg (talk • contribs) 
:Yeah I'm confused about this too - the other 1500 is WWWT in Washington, DC. KSTP is listed on the Clear Channel page, and the first paragraph says it is, but the article later states it's not. Mystic Pixel (talk) 06:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Many clear-channel stations are directional; this has no bearing on the station's status.  See http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/amclasses.html and note that KSTP is listed as a class-A station.  121a0012 (talk) 01:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for clearing that up. Mystic Pixel (talk) 21:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Listed as a Notable Host is "Machine Gun Kelly".  Is this the gangster?  When did he host on AM1500?
Tmagsadie (talk) 11:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable host:  Machine Gun Kelly 

message: We were at the top of the stadium, sec 302 row 15. 3 beer vendors vame through, one had 2 hotdogs left. No water, soda, or food except those 2 hotdogs. All beer. 
  Im ok with that. Lol John bladow (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vendors  

message: I tuned into KSTP-AM during the summer of 1981.  It had become heavily news and talk focused by this time.  But they would still play some music.  However, the music was wee bit behind the times.  63 KDWB and KS95-FM had far better music selections.  I'm sure KSTP-AM was better than this back in the 70's as far as music play.  By fall 1982, music was virtually a thing of the past on this station.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dandy883 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  KSTP-AM in Summer 1981
Talk:Fon language

message: Bonjour,
un nouveau lien sur l'apprentissage du fon du Bénin :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/langue.fongbe/
Bien cordialement.
Gérard Poirot
:Thanks for your link. It looks as a useful addition to the article. If you feel like expanding the article itself (or the French version of it), don't hesitate! 
:PS I have removed your emailadress since listing it openly is a sure way to get spam. For those interested it can still be found in the former revision] of this page. Cheers, — mark ✎ 16:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: If you are a native speaker of Fon then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fon language template

message: This page and the page about Fon people site respectively 1,5 mill and 3,5 mill users of this language. I'm not editing it as I do not know which one would be the correct number. 
Asabiyya (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers discrepancy
Talk:Yamaha GX-1

message: Surely more than 10 were made? If you count the number of owners listed, plus the majority that never left Japan (as alluded to by Gordon Reid's article, under "The Who's Who Of GX1s"). —Liyang 08:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rarity 

message: Huge swathes of this page are identical to this article: http://www.synthmuseum.com/yamaha/yamgx101.html yet neither makes reference to the other. Unless both were written by the same person, somebody has been cutting corners. Melaena (talk) 21:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: how about a section/list on tracks that use it? 
too hard to put together?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.198.82 (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GX1 recordings 

message: No references or citations given for any of the 10 bullet points.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.98.156.195 (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Music
Talk:Robin Warren

message: This article says that Dr. Warren discovered Helicobacter pylori in 1979.  However, the Helicobacter pylori article says that the bacterium was originally seen in 1875, first suspected to cause disease in 1899, and "rediscovered" by Dr. Marshall and Dr. Warren in 1982.  I am wondering if somebody can double-check whether the 1979 date or the 1982 date is correct? 69.140.157.138 02:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery date question 

message: …and initial once-over, based on comparison to Barry Marshall article. Someone with training in micro should ope the 2 articles side by side, and make this as strong s the other. Apart from the biographical details, these stories run in parallel, and the two ledes (and articles should not be so demonstrably different in quality).  Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article shape based on lede
Talk:Honda RC211V

message: Looks like WP:MOS says: "Avoid putting links in headings; try to link the first occurrence of the word or phrase in the section text, instead." Since there are no previous instances of the years in the section text, and since there isn't an outright prohibition from doing so, I'm replacing the links to GP season years to assist navigation to the relevant seasons.--Uli Kunkel 19:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You obviously don't understand the importance of this guideline. It makes links with anchors overly complicated to produce. I'm reverting. If you have a problem with this, fix it to work with the guidelines that the MOS outlines. Roguegeek (talk) 22:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please clarify "It makes links with anchors overly complicated to produce."--Uli Kunkel 23:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I quoted the MOS above so there wouldn't be any confusion; if you revert without addressing how my quote above is invalid I'm going to have to consider it vandalism.--Uli Kunkel 01:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may consider it whatever you want. Frankly, it doesn't matter what you consider it. Wikipedia policy is what defines vandalism and, thankfully, not you. Roguegeek (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links in sections
Talk:Abbess

message: Why are abessess catholic only? Could a buddhist monastery not elect a female to be the head monk? Mualphachi (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-catholic abbessess

message: Can someone more knowledgeable on the subject add relevant comments to the relevant sections of women as theological figures.
Jackiespeel 13:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  women as theological figures 

message: according to the abbey article: abbeys can be either monasteries (which can be male (monk) or female (nun) based) or convents, which are not occupied by nuns or monks but instead by priests, friars, and religious sisters and/or brothers. While colloquially referred to as nuns, religious sisters like the ones who run hospitals are technically not, nuns being involved in isolated contemplation and not community service, and similarly the men who live in convents are not monks. I have no idea if the abbey article is correct, but I think having both articles say the same thing is important; if someone knows better than me, please change both articles, not Insert non-formatted text here -- Akb4 21:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: some discussion with [User:HarvardOxon] leads me to the conclusion that this article and several related ones are factually messed up beyond the ability of anyone not fairly familiar with the structure of the catholic church to correct. Abbess, Convent, Abbey, and probably Abbot and Friar should probably be checked out by an expert; Abbey should probably be tagged as containing inaccuracies. -- Akb4 12:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  nuns 
Talk:Regeneration

message: regeneration is a form of asexual reproduction and onyl certain amphibians and sea creatures have the ability to do this within their body party that break off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.155.200.94 (talk) 15:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What, do you want us to click on the link for you? You found the list of articles about "regeneation", now just pick the one that is relevant to your schoolwork (probably the biological meaning). --Flex 14:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: if you knock something down a use old materials to make it new.
by connor smith  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.112.86 (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  regeneration
Talk:Copper electroplating

message: It's a very stubby stub of an article. (I also deleted the gibberish someone appended to the above.)
It would be nice to have specified voltages and currents listed as well as plating solutions  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.233.242.153 (talk) 22:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs more data 

message: Its suggested to merge this article with the article Bronzing since there is a very high identity between those two subjects  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.86.179.64 (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with other article 

message: "The plating seen in chemistry classes, often obtained with a coin and copper sulphate bath, is in fact deposition as opposed to plating. Subjecting the surface to any wear causes the unstuck deposit to come away. Running such a bath for longer periods, one can often see the grainy like texture of deposition as opposed to the smooth surface of plating."
Very confusing, where on wikipedia can I find the difference between plating and deposition? the page for plating (not copper specific) uses the word deposition to describe plating... Is there a real difference or does "plating seen in chemistry classes" involve a lot of surface inhomogeneities like the bubbles etc making for a more porous substance? An objective difference between plating and deposition would be nice here...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.193.10.216 (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plating vs deposition

message: Copper plating is cool. I'm doing it for my science fair. Anyafoxy123 (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copper plating
Talk:Suzuki GSX-R series

message: Since the term "slabbie" is slang, it shouldn't be used to refer to the motorcycles in the article.  It is fine to define the term since that information is relevant, but the article should have a more formal tone.  Perhaps I'll stop by later and try to clean the article up.  Mrestko 02:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of "Slabbies"

message: Please follow the discussion on talk:Suzuki GS series if you're interested. Thank you.--Cancun771 08:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming of Suzuki range wikis?

message: When I arrived here this evening there was nothing but a single line of introduction or two, and a list of current and discontinued models.  There is now an article, which while not perfect, nor perfectly referenced (yet!) actually tells you something about the importance of the GSX-R, at least as I understand it.
There is this comment here: "Updated and massively expanded-I ride a GSXR 1100 can you tell?" but I'm not sure when it's from.  I went back and as far as I could see it's been a stub for a long time. 
Obviously others who may know more can improve this article, but at least there is something to work from now.  
ZeroXero (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember, if you want to finish something before others start making changes, click My sandbox at the top of your screen and copy the article there to work on. Or add /workpage to the end of the URL for this talk page, and create a subpage to the talk page, called a workpage. It gives you a place to save your work until it's ready to go live. Once it's out there, others will feel free to make changes, and then you have to talk it out if there's a disagreement. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrote an article to replace the stub
Talk:Gravimetry

message: The name for this unit is so overwhelmingly "gal" rather than galileo that Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition]] has neither an entry under "galileo" with this meaning, nor a mention of an alternative name under the "gal" entry.  Gene Nygaard 13:23, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The gal or the galileo

message: I would like to see the image replace with something like http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/342/cache/earth-surface-gravity-map_34243_600x450.jpg
though that may be difficult due to licencing.
Kevink707 (talk) 18:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and thus replaced the image with a more 'visual' example of gravimetry --D'Lemelo (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Image

message: What is the reason behind the recent merge of the Gravimeter page into the Gravimetry page? Perhaps this was done to increase the substance of the article, but the terms are not synonyms. As is the case with for example Spectrometer and Spectroscopy or Thermometer and Thermometry, the same distinction between instrument and field of study exists here. (Even though there is an odd counter-example in Magnetometry) In my opinion, Gravimeter and Gravimetry pages are better kept separate for clarity. Gravimetry is also done with other instruments; gravity gradiometers or GPS satellites for instance. D'Lemelo (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the current page is now for the most part about Gravimeters (and less about the field of Gravimetry), I propose to revert the merge and only keep a short section on the Gravimetry page with a redirect for the detailed description as was the case before. D'Lemelo (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Gravimeter and Gravimetry pages
Talk:Daws Butler

message: My son asked me today who the voice of Mudsy was from Funky Phantom (he's watching Boomerang) and so I went and looked it up.  Although the Funky Phantom article here credits Daws Butler with the voice, the Daws Butler article does not credit him with doing the voice...:)
Thought maybe a cross-reference in the other direction was pertinent, however the voices listed are until 1965 and Funky Phantom was done in 1971, so another section needs to be added or the dates modified?
I don't want to interfer with what other's are currating, so I thought I'd just throw out the idea and let you guys do what needs to be done.
Good luck and let me know if I can help!
Matt
Mbeyers 18:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added.  I don't know why this was ignored for so long. --Captain Infinity (talk) 16:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing credit? 
Talk:Dryopithecus

message: It would bridge a gap if Dryopithecidae could redirect to this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingcrasher (talk • contribs) 22:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dryopithecidae

message: Though it is standard for a living species to get its own article, it is highly unusual for an extinct species to have a separate article from the genus article unless there is a great deal of information out there pertaining to a single species (such as Mammoth) which is very much not the case for D. fontani. Further, the article has only one source and it is, word for word, an exact copy of the Wikipedia article, and I'm not sure who plagiarized who   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  19:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Dryopithecus fontani]] to here
Talk:Stuart Diver

message: Is Stuart Diver notable other than as the last survivor to be rescued from the landslide? Should this article simply be merged to 1997 Thredbo landslide? --Scott Davis Talk 13:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say merge. Enochlau 10:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree he's not notable enough outside Thredbo disaster. There may not be anything to merge here. Perhaps it doesn't belong in WP at all. Lisa 13:51, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't he do a brief stint as a television host or similar after his rise to infamy? -- Longhair | Talk 03:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

text: FYI, :The original article before the redirection is here -- Longhair 08:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Walter M. Miller Jr.

message: "A Canticle for Leibowitz was the only novel by Miller published in his lifetime" is contradicted by the list of two earlier novels.  Does anyone know anything about these.  The article should be rewritten to avoid contradicting itself. Rick Norwood 13:59, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nothing here is said about his childhood and parents. Was Miller Jewish himself before converting? The character Leibowitz certainly was and in the story, converted to Catholicism after the "Simplification".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 06:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miller's background
Talk:Windsor, Berkshire/Archive 1

message: Windsor should disambiguate, as Windsor, Ontario is at least as notable as the subject of this article.
----
*Support -- SwissCelt 14:20, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Proposer supports the proposal as amended.  (This supersedes my initial vote.)  -- SwissCelt 05:30, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Support.  I'd support this move even if Windsor, Ontario didn't exist.  I would contend that 'Windsor' in UK media usage usually means the castle, not the town.  Morwen - Talk 15:58, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

text: *Comment:  I did so because this article has apparently been at both Windsor, England and Windsor, Berkshire.  However, someone has moved it to its present location, thus preventing the move back without an administrator's intervention.  Notability is thus an issue, as the alternative uses of "Windsor" will need to be of sufficient notability to overcome the bias towards primary topic disambiguation.  I believe that they are of sufficient notability; not just Windsor, Ontario, but House of Windsor, Windsor Castle, etc. -- SwissCelt 20:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore

message: Amusingly, Bing had a beautiful picture of the cliff faces with a hint to come to this article to find out where the colours of the rock face come from.  And there is no description here.  Could somebody with knowledge add it please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.209.70.156 (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Colours
Talk:History of Hanover (region)

message: It's good that the flag and the arms were added. But I wonder about the map -- it shows the location of the City of Hanover (not the state) in a current map (not from before 1946, when Hanover still existed). I think it causes more confusion than it helps. Comments? --Chl 14:38, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I'm not sure I agree with making Province of Hanover a separate article. The separation has the disadvantage that it makes information harder to find for the reader; and editors linking to either article have to decide if it is the right one (which may not always be easy). The province had the exact same area as the preceding kingdom; I would consider them different constitutional stages of the same political entity. Chl 01:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Province of Hanover]]

message: Was Kalenberg part of Spanish Habsburg territory in 1648? This map shows it in the same colour as the spanish netherlands --Astrokey44 03:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be intended as a slightly different shade of green.  If not, then it's just an error.RandomCritic 12:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  kalenberg 

message: Hanover cannot be considered exactly equivalent to Calenberg, even though when Ernest Augustus was named Elector "of Hanover" he was just ruling Calenberg; the territories assigned to the Electorate included Calenberg, Celle (which was the larger and, apparently, the more desirable portion) and several other smaller divisions that had earlier become united with either of the two (Ernest Augustus had the expectation of inheriting Celle when his uncle died).  So I've included rulers of both Calenberg and Celle (all very closely related, uncles, brothers and nephews) from the point where the line becomes dynastically distinct from the Dannenburg line that ruled Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel.  The previous history of Calenburg should be addressed in a separate article, as it's not really pertinent to the entity that would become Hanover.  Basically, Hanover = Calenberg+Celle, but not either one of them alone; the latter has its own article under Principality of Lüneburg. RandomCritic 16:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Calenberg and Celle

message: The map referred to is now gone. Obviously I can look up 'Hanover' on Multimap or whatever, but it's inconvenient. I think a modern-day map showing Germany, with the former border of the Principality/Kingdom of Hanover outlined, would be simplest and most useful.
Anyone else bothered by the lack of a map?
WikiReaderer 13:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Map 

message: What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 09:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Timeline of Hanover]]