Talk:Javier Solana/Archive 1

message: == FOR EVERYBODY'S INFORMATION -- THE FOLLOWING ARE NOT AND NEVER WERE CONSTANCE CUMBEY'S COMMENTS!
THIS IS an anonymous user (not SqueakBox, as the record shows)
The entire copy of the Javier Solana article has been added to the Number of the Beast (numerology) article.  Because subtlety is not the hallmark of whoever is doing this.  My money is on "bitter ex-girlfriend", but "big big fan of The Da Vinci Code" would not surprise me either.
This is from User:RickK
:Re: "666" edits
:You have done a lot of Bible study and research.  However, Wikipedia has a policy of No Original Research, please read that page to understand why.  It's an encyclopedia, not a scholarly journal or a forum for publishing essays.
:Another Wikipedia policy is Neutral Point of View.  Suggesting links between Solana and the Antichrist is not a mainstream point of view, and is in fact highly controversial.  So it's not really in conformance with the neutral point-of-view policy and is removed from the article when added. -- 17:35, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 

message: I propose to remove all the 666 references to this article as being completely irrelevant. I believe they have been inserted in a kind of subtle vandalism by people convinced Solana is the Beast. They add nothing to the content of the article, and are unnecessary and meaningless. This just isn't wiki style. What do other people think? --SqueakBox 19:21, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
I have now removed the 2 references to 666 from this article. I seriously suggest that if anyone feels they want this material in Wikipedia that it should be taken to the Number of the Beast (numerology) article, where it could be used to expand the sentence already there about Solana.--SqueakBox 01:24, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
:Fine by me. --One Salient Oversight 05:15, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 666 removal proposal

message: [Personal attack against SqueakBox removed, as per Wikipedia:Remove personal attacks. -- Curps 04:39, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cumbey

message: Cumbey has reverted my work without discussing content and without bothering to correct the inaccuracies I have pointed out. It is not Ferdinand González etc. I have therefore reverted it as the vandalism it is. --SqueakBox 03:44, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
Cumbey has now reverted the article and added a further rant about 21st century american interests that was also removed <S>as a second bit of vandalism. I consider what she is doing is pure vandalism.
 She is reverting to a version she knows is inaccurate. The 3RR rule does not apply to vandalsim. she is not bothering to correct her reverts. i am getting really annoyed that she calls Felipe González Ferdinand. if she disputes my edits she must engage in a content debate with me.--SqueakBox 05:04, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
I am convinced. Cumbey is trolling. How's this for a suggestion SB, why don't you take some time off from this war? I'll contact some administrators I know and ask them to start banning IP addresses. If that doesn't work then we can get the hierarchy involved and maybe even prevent the article from being edited for a time. One Salient Oversight 05:27, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit war