lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Subnet

message: The article mentions /64 for residential customers, and yes for those with a single home network, that would be right. But some need more than one network in the home. Comcast, at least, will assign a /60 for residential customers to allow for that. I don't know that others do that, but as I understand it, that is the way it is supposed to be done. Should the article mention this? Gah4 (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IPv6 

message: I used to know about Appletalk phase 2, but haven't thought about it for a while. There is also DECnet. It would seem that subnets are a good idea, and that other network systems would also use them. Gah4 (talk) 02:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other than IP 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Subnet has been agreed upon here as the WP:COMMONNAMEcommon name (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 15:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Subnetwork →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. PhotographyEdits (talk) 11:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per Netoholic and No such user. We title our articles per WP:COMMONNAME, not per WP:ENCYCLOPEDICNAME. —В²C ☎ 04:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Support. I don't believe the evidence supports the suggestion that attested use is as an adjective. Collins, for example, clearly indicates that it is a noun. The Free Dictionary (AHD) also has it as subnet, though Oxford and Merriam-Webster have it as subnetwork. Most other dictionaries (MacMillan, Cambridge, etc) do not seem to have either. So, even split there. Etymologically, per No such user there does not seem to be convincing evidence that the shorter form is derived from the longer, unlike internetwork. There is, of course, RFC-932 which precedes that, but RFC-917 precedes that in turn. It seems equally likely in my opinion that the two forms were derived in parallel, however much significance we should ascribe it. I do note that an intitle: search dies yield more books with "subnetwork" however it does appear that not all of those are about computing. Overall, I find it highly likely that the shorter form is much more common in its own right rather than as an abbreviation, however, I am open to revising my opinion should anyone be willing to do a more detailed review. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 June 2023
Talk:Þórsdrápa

message: I changed Sturlsson to Snorri and Snorra-Edda respectively. The patronymic of Snorri is Sturluson, not Sturlusson (one of my pet peeves) and Icelanders go by first names. Sturlusson is meaningless, however one looks at it. Io 18:55, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:John A. Roebling

message: Someone vandalized part of a sentence under "Legacy", I have backtracked through older versions and it is in every version.  What is this?  Does someone know the correct information to revert this?
* I fixed it. Someone copied a chunk of the earlier text along with a piece of nonsense. --Tysto 18:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Seen on his grave at Find-A-Grave, it says 1800. Lincher 21:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC
That is a goof by someone named Parsons. If you look at the stone it says 1806.
JaxmrcleanJaxmrclean (talk) 22:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: Doses anyone know of any oil paints from the 1800 that were painted by John Roebling or by J. Roeblings Wife? I have one dated 1851 signed J.Roebling The oil is of a young boy 2-5 yaers of age. I think it may be of Charles Roebling. Charles was born 1849 and the painting is dated 1851. If any one can help me with my search it would be helpfull. Thanks kippitykonrad@gmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.64.130.78 (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oil paintings 

message: I think the "honors" section isn't written in proper english. Not being a native speaker myself I wouldn't like to change it. But I think that someone who knows english better than I should take a look at it. 91.50.46.24 (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You were correct, and I've fixed it.  Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Honors" section 

message: The German Historical Institute in Washington, DC has published a short biographical article on John A. Roebling that can be found here: http://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entry.php?rec=37
Immigrantentrep (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Source 

message: Under Honors, I found "In the sixth-season Brooklyn Nine-Nine episode "The Tattler," it's revealed that Jake and Gina attended John Roebling High School." I moved this line to the In Popular Culture section. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change.
Talk:Washington Roebling

message: True or false: this person was named in honor of George Washington. (Check out the Honored Americans project at Talk:George Washington.) 66.245.87.137 19:15, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please refrain from adding material or sources which are irrelevant, i.e. information about the Brooklyn Bridge excavation. In addition, this is not a biography of a living person - Washington Roebling has been dead since 1926.
Brian Mulholland 20:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevant Material

message: According to Attack and Defense of Little Round Top by Oliver Willcox Norton, Roebling sent the 104th (or 140th?) NY to Little Round Top, not knowing that Lt. Ranald S. Mackenzie, another of Warren's aides, and another lieutenant had intercepted Vincent's brigade and sent it to Little Round Top. The 104th NY arrived later in the fight and reinforced Vincent. Norton was Vincent's bugler and standard bearer and was with Vincent when he was killed. Norton would have been riding with Vincent as the 5th Corps came on to the battlefield and would have heard Lt. MacKenzie's request to Vincent. Later Norton became an officer in the 8th U.S.C.T. and a founder of the American Can Corporation.  I'm not sure of the NY regiment's number and will check later and then come back to modify the text and add reference and citation. This Brooklyn-born boy is currently reading The Great Bridge. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 01:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gettysburg 

message: Under the Brooklyn Bridge construction section, it states:
Beside the bends, he may have had additional afflictions, possible neurasthenia, side effects of treatments, and secondary drug addiction.
—so what is "secondary drug addiction"? --74.100.117.52 (talk) 07:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary drug addiction? 

message: The German Historical Institute in Washington, DC has published a short biographical article on Washington Roebling that can be found here: http://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entry.php?rec=52
Immigrantentrep (talk) 20:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Source 

message: While the article in its current state provides an excellently fleshed out biography, it contains almost no information on later legacy. The writings of Roebling were featured in Ken Burn's The Civil War, and while I know very little about him outside of this context, I'm sure the architect of the Brooklyn Bridge had some other impact on the world after his death. I've added a tag accordingly. 2601:643:8102:AAA0:FD53:D01E:7B7:FE3B (talk) 03:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of legacy, particularly of Civil War service
Talk:Pixar

message: In the section starting with "The two companies attempted to reach a new agreement for ten months and failed...", a series of dates are listed then an apparent result is mentioned, but neither seems to match the objective of the start of the paragraph. Danlo88 (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . ‍ Masterofthebrick  ‍ talk  12:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article missing information or otherwise not making sense. 

message: I'm talking about this sentence:
The Newsweek article on Toy Story 4 that is cited there ([37]) mentions nothing of this deal. If I search on the internet to corroborate this $26 million dollar deal, I only get recent results (last several years) that are all from summary articles (ie. not detailed secondary sources) with suspiciously similar phrasing to the above sentence. 
Doing brief research, I found an SEC filing that mentions Disney and Pixar *did* have a movie deal from 1991, but there's no mention of any payment to Pixar (let alone the $26 million figure) and I can't find any reliable looking source for that claim. In there, it also says that movie deal was for "up to three" films, *not* "three films", so that part of the sentence is probably inaccurate.
Using Blame, i found that the original incarnation of this sentence was added to Wikipedia in 2004 without a citation. Searching by date on Google, I can't find any still existing webpage from 2004 or earlier that corroborates this $26 million dollar deal, and I think all of the more recent ones are just copying from the Wikipedia page. 
I would edit the sentence in the article to remove the $26 million figure and have it say "up to three films" instead, but my account is new and the page is protected. The $26 million claim *might* be true, but i think just adding a "" wouldn't deter people from continuing to spread this unverified claim around. Does anyone with more experience know what the best thing to do in this situation is? Tinkledoop (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think the "$26 million dollar deal with Disney" claim is false. What to do? 

message: Has anyone would like to add the highest-grossing film table list for Pixar? 2601:603:167F:3F50:EF05:58D5:6136:C52D (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add the highest-grossing film table list for Pixar Animation Studios 

message: Replace the reference attached to the sentence "In December 2022, Disney CEO Bob Iger noted that they would rely more on the Pixar brand", which currently links to an archived retweet of a video, with this transcript of the same video from the actual source: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/09/cnbc-exclusive-cnbc-transcript-disney-ceo-bob-iger-speaks-with-cnbcs-david-faber-on-squawk-on-the-street-today.html 203.211.79.95 (talk) 02:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024
Talk:The Three Musketeers (1921 film)

message: VfD discussion:
----
Seems like a review as opposed to an actual article on the movie. -- Grunt (talk) 22:55, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)
*It's am important movie, we should probably have an article on it- but this isn't it. Delete.  Keep as rewritten- nice stub.-FZ 23:44, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Were there four of them in the film, or just three as the name suggests?  Dream Focus 13:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , The Three Musketeers has this premise, "Set between 1625 and 1628, it recounts the adventures of a young man named d'Artagnan (a character based on Charles de Batz-Castelmore d'Artagnan) after he leaves home to travel to Paris, hoping to join the Musketeers of the Guard. Although d'Artagnan is not able to join this elite corps immediately, he is befriended by three of the most formidable musketeers of the age – Athos, Porthos and Aramis, 'the three musketeers', or 'the three inseparables' – and becomes involved in affairs of state and at court." So there are four key characters in the story. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:43, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  why are there four people in the picture for the three musketeers?
Talk:Phoenix Award

message: I still think this is a stub, it's long because of the list but still doesn't have very much info. If you disagree though, please remove the stub message --Dyss 20:40, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it provides more info and it is easily extensible. --P64 (talk) 19:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: (in progress 2014-07-14)
: 2013: Kevin Henkes, Owen // honor Denise Fleming
: 2014: Raymond Briggs, The Bear // honor Peggy Rathmann Anne Isaacs, Paul O. Zelinsky
: 2015: Sara Fanelli, My Map Book  // honor Charlotte Zolotow Kady MacDonald Denton
--P64 (talk) 01:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Book updates

message: with the London Borough of Lambeth Phoenix Book Award, inaugurated 2007, wh "promotes reading for pleasure among Year 6 and Key Stage 3". --P64 (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not to be confused 

message: Identity of the 2014 winning picture book was posted 2013-06-20 by UMN-Morehead re its faculty member activities. The notice suggests to me that the 2014 committee decisive meeting occurred during the 2013 conference. ChLA did not announce the 2014 award on its public website (rather the 2013 award, which was presented at that conference) but perhaps on its members-only site.
The 2014 awards were featured in ChLA Newsletter Fall 2013; see p6-7. I'll now use this source for basic 2014 update (having done the basic 2015 update previously).
Open question: Has there been any change in the award schedule other than this month's announcement of 2015 awards on the public website (probably by update at once from 2013 to 2015)? Perhaps the decisive committee meeting has always occurred one year in advance, with announcement in ChLA member publications.
--P64 (talk) 18:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2014 Awards
Talk:List of cities, towns and villages in Cyprus

message: "Tricomo is the birth place of Professor Zavos who is in no doubt today, the most famous Cypriot known around the World" -should go to an entry about Tricomo, whoever Mr. Zavos is. --Yak 20:46, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Prof. Zavos

message: Kornos is not in this list. Does it belong to the occupied part of Cyprus or not? Wiki-uk 12:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing: Kornos

message: perhaps the title would be better as 'on Cyprus' so as to avoid any confusion regarding the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Jake the Editor Man  (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Either that or merge the TRNC list and this one together.  BTW, on that same topic - in my copy of the WRTH, there are three towns mentioned - Sevilitepe, Sinandagi, and Kantara.  What would be the Greek names of these, and where are these located? --64.222.41.37 (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'on Cyprus' 

message: Towns in northern Cyprus should be listed Turkish then Greek, and alphabetized as such. Jd2718 (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Cyprus 

message: This page needs a major cleanup. I would suggest having listings for the 5 district and listing all towns in the format : English spelling / Greek spelling / Turkish spelling. 
A second section could list the names in Northern Cyprus sorted by North Cypriot district in the format : Turkish spelling / English/Latin-Greek spelling / Greek spelling. Passportguy (talk) 02:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: LOLWUT?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.184.206.60 (talk) 07:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Srovolos is minor?! 
Talk:Latitat

message: I have considerable problems with this article and am considering a complete re-write.
In the first place, latitat, for much of its history, refers to a procedure using a bill and not a writ at all. The article does not make clear that it was devised as a procedural dodge in order to bring cases in the King's Bench rather than the Common Pleas. The quote from Blackstone is hardly illuminating.
Secondly the article seems to think that the King's Bench was the only common law court and in England at least latitat is not "defunct" but abolished (along with the forms of action).
Would anyone object if I subjected this article to a complete re-write?
Francis Davey 21:10, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:Athletes (track and field) at the 2004 Summer Olympics

message: Would it be an idea to rename this page as Sportspeople at the 2004 Summer Olympics as calling all competitors athletes will slightly confuse the situation when everyone in the Category:Athletes , which is a sub-cat of Category:Sportspeople by sport, is a person competing in Athletics rather than just a sportsperson. The only sub-cat in Category:Athletes that does not relate specifically to Athletics is another  Olympic one Category:Olympic athletes which also should be moved.Scraggy4 21:10, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, that's an idea.  Out of sheer momentum (or perhaps stubbornness), though, I'm going to finish tagging all of the sportspeoples' bios with :Category:Athletes at the 2004 Summer Olympics.  If we decide that it would make better sense to have them under :Category:Sportspeople at the 2004 Summer Olympics instead, then we can use a bot to change the tags. --bdesham 04:13, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  With the change in this category to :Category:Olympians at the 2004 Summer Olympics, doesn't this put all of this heirarchy out of whack? ie. :Category:Olympic athletes. --132.205.15.4 03:29, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Piraha tribe

message: :This article has been merged and repointed to the main article: Pirahã people
This page has similar content and aim as Pirahã. I believe Pirahã (see paper linked from there) is the prefered name for the tribe, not Piraha. I can't find anything saying that exactly, but more sites, including SIL website, (Archive of) U. Pittsburg site and ISA site on Pirahã, appear to use Pirahã instead of Piraha. -- Mairi 22:00, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I wasn't aware there was already an article when I worked on this last week. --Zerbey 02:04, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

text: Would it be better to say they have no organised religion? --Zerbey 21:00, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Alpha Chi Alpha

message: I was a '90 and a barn dweller at that sophomore summer and senior year. never heard of The Ramos, but otherwise I think the article is excellent and a service to the house and to the completeness of the wiki.
thanks for the effort on it and thanks to the no-delete votes.
--
:Ramos is an '07 brother.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.239.44 (talk) 22:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck is "The Ramos?"
Talk:Drinking Water Equivalent Level

message: was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE AND REDIRECT
This article has no potential to be encyclopedic.  Google finds , which defines DWEL as a measure used in defining the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal.  MCLG seems to be a useful measure, judging from the referenced page, but DWEL is not.  This article also has an associated redirect DWEL, which should also be deleted if this article is. 141.211.62.118 22:44, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Seven Beauties

message: :"The ones who don't enjoy themselves even when they laugh. Oh, yeah. The ones who worship the corporate image not knowing that they work for someone else. Oh, yeah. The ones who should have been shot in the cradle. Pow! Oh, yeah. The ones who say follow me to success but kill me if I fail, so to speak. Oh, yeah. The ones who say we Italians are the greatest he-men on earth. Oh, yeah. The ones who are from Rome. The ones who say that's for me. The ones who say, you know what I mean. Oh, yeah. The ones who vote for the right because they're fed up with strikes. Oh, yeah. The ones who vote white in order not to get dirty. Oh, yeah. The ones who never get involved with politics. Oh, yeah. The ones who say, be calm. Calm. The ones who still support the king. The ones who say, yes, Sir. Oh, yeah. The ones who make love standing in their boots and imagine they're in a luxurious bed. The ones who believe Christ is Santa Claus as young man. Oh, yeah. The ones who say: Oh, what the hell. The ones who were there. The ones who believe in everything ... even in God. The ones who listen to the national anthem. Oh, yeah. The ones who love their country. The ones who keep going, just to see how it will end. Oh, yeah. The ones who are in garbage up to here. Oh, yeah. The ones who sleep soundly, even with cancer. Oh, yeah. The ones who even now don't believe the world is round. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. The ones who're afraid of flying. Oh, yeah. The ones who've never had a fatal accident. Oh, yeah. The ones who've had one. The ones who at a certain point in their lives create a secret weapon, Christ. Oh, yeah. The ones who are always standing at the bar. The ones who are always in Switzerland. The ones who started early, haven't arrived and don't know they're not going to. Oh, yeah. The ones who lose wars by the skin of their teeth. The ones who say, everything is wrong here. The ones who say, now let's all have a good laugh. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah."
Is this really necessary? I thought it was vandalism but it's been here a while. I can't imagine anyone reading this all of the way through and it helping their understanding of the film. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 01:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia!  I'm glad you have discovered talk pages, and you are correct, a lot of the time there are things on talk pages that do not help the editing effort.  This is, of course, frowned upon, and you are correct in feeling that the above really does not belong here.  But I hope you will understand that such is the nature of Wikipedia, which anyone can edit!   Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Marteau (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion?
Talk:Rowing at the 2004 Summer Olympics

message: There are a lot of results missing from this page; is there anywhere we can borrow them from? Dunc_Harris|☺ 22:54, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They can all be found at a number of locations such as  or  it is simply that there have not been enough peole contributing to these pages and those of that there are have done bloody wonders already I think. Fell free to help and join in.Scraggy4 23:21, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result sources 

message: This page of results is very large and seems to have a lot of different styles of results and some missing results.  My suggestion is that every event is split onto a separate page and then some kind of template is followed so all the pages look the same. 
Looking through the other olympic sports they all seem to use a similar design with countries flags.  (examples in Swimming and Athletics).
We could so something like:
# Great Britain (Steve Williams, James Cracknell, Ed Coode, Matthew Pinsent) 6:20.85 Semi A
I'm happy to do the work - just want to make sure no one is against me doing this.
Johnteslade 21:43, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, go for it.  I was going to do it, and I may yet help! Dunc_Harris|☺ 21:59, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split to multiple pages? 

message: I have just updated Rowing at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Men's double sculls to conform to the standard style we are trying to converge upon for all Olympic sports, not just rowing.  The key thing is to use templates such as , , and  to render nation flags in a consistent way, and to create links to the appropriate "Nation at the 2004 Summer Olympics" article instead of to the article for the nation itself.  I still think there are some potential improvements that I did not implement here yet.  For example, lining up all the times in each race makes the results much easier to read, but requires some table formatting.  Check out Canoeing at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Men's C-1 500 metres for an example of how this is done.  Andrwsc 17:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting
Talk:Herder

message: From VfD:
*Delete. I think Herdsman should be moved here to avoid sexism. Any objections must be explained using as much detail as you can. 66.245.124.71 22:52, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments