lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jan Arnoldus Schouten

message: In de Dutch system, a PhD candidate is not a "student". This was even confirmed by the supreme court. PhD candidates have a Mater of Science degree or equivalent, which implies that they have finished their studies. A PhD candidate employed by a university is an employee by law, since he is supposed to contribute to one of the legal tasks of a Dutch university: doing science. We no longer have slavery in The Netherlands;) Rbakels (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Doctoral student" 
Talk:MountainWest Sports Network

message: *Since when is it on Direct TV? {UNSIGNED COMMENT}
**It isn't. {UNSIGNED COMMENT}
**Is their a website that shows which MWC baseball games will be aired this 2008 season? {UNSIGNED COMMENT}
**It is. DirectTV will cary the mtn. beginning September 2008, just in time for the 2008 collegiate football season. Streltzer (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Direct TV

message: *I added the infobox format for a regional sports network. There are other matters that we could add to it, so suggestions are appreciated. For instance, how about a better png or svg logo?  Or any graphic logo for the mtn. secondary logo? Streltzer (talk) 17:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: InfoBox

message: I understand the designation of CBS Sports Network, with the same parent company, as a "sister channel."  But the other networks listed are not in any way owned or operated by CBS; their only commonality seems to be that they have a considerable amount of college sports comment, some of which involves schools in the area which formerly was the primary market targeted by The Mtn.  Comments?  72.105.74.151 (talk) 01:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sister Channel"?
Talk:Watergate salad

message: Originally called Kraft Pistacchio Salad.  No one quite knows how the name Watergate came about.  I suspect it was served in delis in the DC area, perhaps during the Watergate scandal, or possibly was a dish first served at the Watergate Hotel. -   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 20:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs a source

message: The pistachio pudding mix counts as nuts?  Pretty sure it's basically just green food coloring and sugar. Air (talk) 03:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Full of Nuts"?

message: "The origin of the name 'Watergate salad' is obscure." -OK off to a good start.
"'It was in 1975, the same year that pistachio pudding mix came out.'[citation needed]" -fine.
"The Denver Post, in the Empire Magazine of June 27, 1976 published a recipe for Watergate Salad." Wait, what? Empire Magazine or Denver Post? Make up your mind. 
"Watergate salad was a concoction thought up by a sous chef at the Watergate Hotel, and it was then served at brunch on most weekends." -I thought we just said the origin was obscure. Why didn't you tell me this sooner?
"Watergate Salad took off in popularity during and after the presidential scandal which shares the same name." OK now I'm really confused because we just said the scandal happened 3 years before the salad was invented.
38.88.197.138 (talk) 01:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology Section Is Insane
Talk:Logical framework

message: This article mentions the `LF Logical Framework' all over the place, yet seems to refer to the Edinburgh Logical Framework specifically.  IMO, this would seem to mislead the reader into think that ELF is the logical framework, when in fact there are many.  Depending on one's culture and background (e.g, CMU / North America or Europe), one might use LF to refer to the Edinburgh Logical Framework, Martin-Löf's Logical Framework, or some other variant.  The distinction between a `logical framework' as an abstract concept and an individual instance of a logical framework should really be made clearer in the article. 67.60.81.45 (talk) 01:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes the article was pretty confused. I hope it's less so now. Tijfo098 (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: LF (logical framework)
Talk:Mirapoint Email Appliance

message: I created this page by following a link on the IMAP page; I do intend to fill it out to meet Wikipedia's standards. Aliza250 21:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: JoeNMLC (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan article message
Talk:Vietnamese literature

message: This article has absolutely nothing on modern Vietnamese literature.
Entenman (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

message: The translations of ca dao do not preserve the rhythm schemes that the article mentions. Should this be fixed by either having a better translation, or adding the Vietnamese original version? Eistube (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems strange that only English translations are given, but no original Vietnamese texts. Badagnani (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know the original Vietnamese versions to most of those, so should I add them? Eistube (talk) 05:42, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

text: It would seem quite appropriate, if it's not too long for the article. Perhaps it could be split out into an article of its own. I think there may be some nice templates that would allow you to quote both languages in a visually pleasing way, but I'm not sure how. There's some poetry given at Vè but I don't like the formatting very much. Badagnani (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How should one split the ca dao section to a different page? It is too detailed right now, where it should have been just a summary of the form, like other forms in Vietnamese literature. I suppose copy and paste is not allowed, but some parts should be moved to its own page. Then I'll start inserting the Vietnamese original version. Eistube (talk) 19:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ca Dao

message: "much of the written work during this period was in Hanese." - What on earth is "Hanese"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.107.114.60 (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hanese"
Talk:Hot-dip galvanization

message: How to control the thickness of the galvanize layers, when passing through the liquid zinc.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wsimondd (talk • contribs). 
See my comment on the main "galvanize" page.  In addition to information on hot-dip galvanizing, the American Galvanizers Association's website also has information about other zinc coatings, such as electroplating, sheet metal, metallizing, etc. Also, on google searches of "hot-dip galvanizing," "galvanizing," and "galvanized steel," the AGA will appear within the top 5 sites.   
71.218.208.72 21:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a link to our website 

message: Is painting required for the galvanized pipe  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.163.80.251 (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting Requirement for Hot Dipped Galvanized Pipe 

message: "Other modern techniques have largely replaced hot-dip for these sorts of roles. This includes electrogalvanizing, which deposits the layer of zinc from an aqueous electrolyte by electroplating, forming a thinner and much stronger bond. "
Is this true? Is bond strength ever a problem with hot dip galvanizing? Details please. Antipattern3 (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Process
Category talk:Property law

message: Does any one out there know about uk Housing Benefit Law and regulations?
My problem is this:
A man was in prison and due to be released. I obtained a tenancy for him for the date of release. But on the day he was 'gate arrested' on further charges and remanded back i prison
Two weeks later he was bailed to the tenancy I had originally obtained. He is in receipt of state benefits. But the Housing the Local Authority will not allow Housing Benefit for the two weeks he was on remand on the grounds that he never set foot in the tenancy. The landlord says he wants the rent for those two weeks. My man cannot afford to pay.
Any advice please.
86.145.167.66 21:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Tryphon of Pechenga

message: ploarizing in copmuter science  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AneesHassan786 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  polarizing 

message: the process of mapping a magnetic disks surface is known as
A)Polarizing
B)Formatting
C)Accessing
D)Charging
Answer: Polarizing
for more details
Aneeshassan278@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AneesHassan786 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  polarizing bye Anees hassan
Talk:Bill Dudleston

message: This article only cites the company's website.  It needs independent sources.  Corvus cornix 21:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: *http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Bill+Dudleston+legacy+audio
**16 sources available. Addhoc 23:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Search for references
Talk:Econ Journal Watch

message: It seems that this page is a bit biased in favor of EWJ, and could use a rewrite from a more detached perspective. I'm particularly thinking of the idea that EWJ fills an alleged void...
207.245.100.120 21:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: biased in favor

message: I think this article should be merged into Atlas Network. Any objections? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Legacy Audio

message: This has no false infomation on it.
No products are advertized.
It set up a base for users to add to it.
They already have!!
The reviews will be taken off.
Legacyaudio 21:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Generally the guidelines for Wiki WP:EL are that external links should be: minimal, meritable, relevant, unique and should contain info that cannot be integrated into the article. The following types of links are forbidden: MySpace, Facebook, Tweeter, promo web sites, personal blogs, personal web sites, biased web sites and a long lists of links in general are forbidden. --Kbob (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews Section and Wiki external link policy 
Talk:Third-cause fallacy

message: I don't have any textbooks on this subject, but my googling suggests that 'ignoring a common cause' is a much more common name for this and 'third-cause fallacy' is rare. Does anyone have any evidence one way or the other? --Heron (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common name of this fallacy? 

message: merge with Third Variable Problem??? Kassorlae (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge - change? 

message: When I studied Logic in grad school the example used to explain the Third Cause Fallacy was a case in New York City known as the "Ice Cream Murders." It seems that statisticians noticed that the murder rate in NYC correlated almost perfectly with the sale of ice cream. The third cause of hot weather didn't come out immediately. OOPS! Dick Kimball (talk) 12:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice Cream Murders
Talk:K31

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Is the maximum firing range 5.5 km correct? Effective range of 500m looks realistic, but I don't think you have chance of hitting a target more than 5 km away with any rifle ... 
Křžut (talk) 13:13, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The maximum firing range is realistic for well designed full-power rifle cartridges but useless for normal aimed direct firing at point targets. The standard sight line does not allow range settings past 1.5 km. The GP 11 projectiles will be plunging downwards at a target several kilometers more away. Plunging fire is used by artillery and machine guns (using similar full-power rifle ammunition) and is regarded as a method of combating/harrasing distant (area) targets.--Francis Flinch (talk) 19:09, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  maximum firing range?
Talk:Truth-conditional semantics

message: BAM! The refutation given by Scott Soames is probably the prettiest I've ever seen in philosophy. His article is kind of weak and apparently he got the idea from someone else, but the content = gorgeous. I'd condition his truth if you know what I mean.Heyitspeter (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  You guys need to read some modern books on linguistics, not start Wikipedia articles based on stuff from the 1970s. I added a merge tag. See  for instance. Tijfo098 (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I'm not an expert in this subject so I'd like to have the concept explained before it's being criticized, for that reason I started this discussion here and will be adding a Missing Information template on the page, thank you. MurasakiLizard (talk) 23:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article does not explain the concept before criticizing it
Talk:WAME

message: The FCC call sign history was significantly at variance with the dates in the article.  The article is a bit choppy at the moment, as I removed/toned down the personally invested tone of the original article, which clearly was written with a POV that "preachers" and "Charlotte" are undesirable things.  In the spirit of full disclosure, I lived in Statesville from 1970 to 1977.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 21:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Hotel Theresa

message: The article says it opened in 1913, but it also says it opened in 1940. Whats this mean? --Ragemanchoo (talk) 12:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read again. It says it opened in 1913 and stopped restricting black guests in 1940. Uucp (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening year?

message: Someone should compile a list of all the films and documentaries which feature or mention the hotel (or purport to). There are a few of them out there -- "Fidel: The Untold Story" being one of them. Most references will likely be in regard to its fleeting Cold War history, I would think.
Pazouzou (talk) 16:47, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention in Film & Documentary
Talk:Acaster Malbis

message: I will be reworking this along similar York villages and areas i have done recently. This is an important village historically.Rimmer1993 (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work to be done 
Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/BotName

message: Please add visible text saying the following:
The bot operator forgot to change the value for BotName either in the BRFA, or the box when creating it. Please go back and try again.
Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 21:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this necessary? When they click the box it takes them to the edit page which has a hidden comment pretty much saying the same thing. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 03:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On several bot requests, they forgot to change "BotName" to their bot name from within the page - therefore, the "tasks" links in the BRFA link here. I noticed it on one of the current BRFA's. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 03:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, now I get it.  Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 03:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text:  . Gimmetrow 05:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Antonyapm (talk) 09:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. sonia♫ 10:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Antonyapm, 22 September 2010 

message: The bot operator forgot to change the value for BotName either in the BRFA, or the box when creating it. Please go back and try again.
X3shalvin 17:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly needs to be changed? —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 17:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The two versions are identical. Request disabled. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from X3shalvin, 24 October 2010 

message: Please edit the page of Organisation Chart. I have added one new dimention of the chart -- which can be called "Responsibility chart". Please add the article I have posted in addition to the exisisting. Thank you
Manaschakra (talk) 18:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What does this page have to do with Organizational chart and your edit? I'm disabling the edit request as this clearly is not the right place for this request. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 18:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Manaschakra, 16 November 2010
Talk:Hibiscadelphus wilderianus

message: I had visited Hawaii and those trees are still growing in that area! I have a prove . Also specific aroma from this tree is used by TOM FORD in his perfumes! Please don't lie to people! Thank you 185.131.243.92 (talk) 08:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your facts in this page are untrue!
Talk:Ascari Ecosse

message: This page should be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because it was extensively vandalized by MegaMack02 in order to create a blatant hoax on the page. --Mir Markey (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to include the info here as well: Speedy deletion was contested; page found to be acceptable. Edits made by the vandal in question were reverted by @Bbb23 and @Mir Markey prior to the deletion nomination. Corqe (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion
Talk:Hildegardia populifolia

message: ...found only in India...It is threatened by habitat loss; just about 20 trees are known to exist on the eastern slopes of the Kalrayan Hills. It's described as existing all over Viet Nam in a plant catalog published in Viet Nam in 1999 by the botanist Phạm Hoàng Hộ.--Mirrordor 00:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation status
Talk:Stillingfleet

message: Is there a church in Stillingfleet with a square tower? Kingturtle (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: St. Helen's Church in Stillingfleet has a square tower. Have a look at the GENUKI page which has links to 3 photographs of the church. Keith D (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

text: I think we should - I will start it off. Keith D (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  church?
Category talk:Demons in Hinduism

message: Kali not a demon 2402:8100:386D:E138:C48C:A14B:F62E:2C6D (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Kali is, Kali is not. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 07:56, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kali not a demon
Talk:Mirza Masroor Ahmad

message: People coming here protesting about false claims in this article are doing so only because Google somehow links to this article in a search for caliph of Islam. I think we should revert on sight such requests from the ignorant (I use that term because they obviously cannot be bothered to read the article). ~Anachronist (talk) 23:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a small FAQ to the top of this page, similar to what is being done in Talk:Muhammad and Talk:Adam's Bridge to help stem the tide from drive-by requests. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think it may be time to just start reverting on sight. At the most jaded level, if they can't be bothered to read anything else on the page, they won't bother to read a reply explaining the situation. —C.Fred (talk) 03:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert on sight? 

message: PTA degrades Wikipedia services for not blocking 'sacrilegious content'. Possibly related to this article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the interested 

message: Due to the ongoing stream of anon IPs who ignore the prominent warning about "Caliph of Islam" at the top of this page, this page is once again semi-protected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: And shortly after this protection expired, it happened again. Semiprotection has been re-applied. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page protected again
Talk:Josef Ganz

message: Wikipedia is, no doubt, an unending source of awe.
Now someone has come up with an unheard-of type of "issue" and has even built a template for it. Its subject is: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." and is invoked by writing .
So, WHAT IS WRONG if a contributor has "a close connection" with the subject? Does this mean that a contributor must be completely disconnected, or better perhaps, completely ignorant  of the subject in order for the article to be more legitimate? (this second hypothesis often happens) And further, can you imagine any rule as stupid as this one? --AVM (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some "ISSUE" 
Talk:Josef Müller-Brockmann

message: Hi there! I am a student taking a History of Design and Digital Media class.  I am interested in contributing information to this article page.  After viewing the article, the page is set up nicely, but is lacking some information.  Some suggestions I have to improve the article include:
*adding an image of Josef Müller-Brockmann
*additional information about his life and education
*listing his works/designs
*adding images of his works/designs
*his influence/contribution to typography and design
Allyscully (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Article
Talk:Josef Oberhauser

message: Josef Oberhauser (Nazi) →  – Requesting that this be made into the primary topic (and the disambiguation page be removed) since he is somewhat more notable than Josef Oberhauser (bobsleigh) of the same name and we have quite a bit more paper on this SS officer (much of which has not been added yet). Hoops gza (talk) 05:10, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoops, in line with the consensus reached back on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Germany as to "Nazi" renames, this article title needs to be renamed. As to making him the primary, I would wait a couple of days and if no one objects, go ahead and do it. Kierzek (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Josef Váchal

message: The previous version of Vachal's later yearss seemed questionable on a number of accounts, such as that it related his later years in rhetorical terms, e.g. that Vachal "refused to allow the communists to prepare any exhibition of his works, although they tried to get him to collaborate with them." First of all, during the last years of Vachal's life everybody from Vaclav Havel to Josef Skvorecky were getting published at this time (the 1960s), so does that mean that Havel was thereby collaborating with the communists? And, considering the fact that such well known anti-communists as Havel and Skvorecky were getting published at this time, why did Vachal refuse any exhibitions if he really was cast into such a desperately poor situation that he was reduced to drinking melted snow water to survive (this is a very odd reference, I'm not aware of any dissidents who were cut off from the public water supply!). In fact, the whole scenario presented is very odd and since it has no references I have eliminated it and, in its place, translated and placed the relevant section of Vachal's entry in the Czech Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.90.1.18 (talk) 20:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vachal's later years 
Talk:Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth

message: does anyone have any information on his family tree? did he have siblings? 81.145.242.116 22:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
12* 14'N 17* 62'E
24.76.177.214 (talk) 02:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Co-ordinates specified above are invalid/incorrect. The co-ordinates in the article do hit the right place on streetmap. Keith D (talk) 10:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: :In Encyclopédie, the 18th-century French encyclopaedia, the entry on 'Wolstrope' is almost entirely about Newton, his biography hidden because the editors were ideologically opposed to the Great Man theory.
Removed here, since the claim that the 18th-century editors were opposed to an idea of Thomas Carlyle, not yet born, is a bit too confused to rephrase. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedie