Talk:Neighborhoods of Richmond, Virginia

message: I am concerned that the posting for the Randolph neighborhood may violate the Wikipedia core content policies of "no original research," "neutral point of view," and "verifiability." Specifically, my concerns are:
* there is no source identified for the boundaries of the neighborhood. These boundaries appear to be original research. Many residents within the area encompassed by the boundaries listed in the article consider themselves to be residents of the neighborhoods of Maymont and Byrd Park, not the neighborhood of Randolph. Furthermore, there are residents of areas outside the boundaries described in the article who do consider themselves to be residents of Randolph. The site http://www.richmondcrime.org, which is maintained by the Richmond Police department and tracks crime statistics by neighborhood, is one source that defines the boundaries of the Randolph neighborhood differently than this article does.
* there is no source for the statement in the article that the neighborhood is "troubled by drug activity." This statement appears to be original research. Again, Richmond Police statistics from http://richmondcrime.org could be used to back up or refute this statement. However, the fact that the Richmond Police have defined the boundaries of Randolph differently than this article defines them complicates the task of using those statistics to back up or refute the statement.
* there is no source for the statement that "some...call the area 'The USA'" because "many of the streets are named after US states." This statement appears to be original research. At any rate, a neutral point of view would identify "Maymont" as another name (and, I would argue, a much more commonly used name) for the area where the streets are named after states (again, see http://richmondcrime.org).
References should be added to this article to back up the statements the article makes about the Randolph neighborhood. Alternatively, I recommend removing the Randolph article altogether, to be eventually replaced by an article that is backed up with research.
CEMjr 08:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Randolph post may violate Wikipedia core content policies

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neighborhoods of Richmond, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206070204/http://historicrichmond.com/blog/category/court-end/ to http://historicrichmond.com/blog/category/court-end/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Four-sentence article is un-referenced. Only content is about location and artery names. Would fit well in section of the target article. (Probably others, too). —[AlanM1(talk)]— 11:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Creighton Court]] 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Seriously? There's a heading called "Hoods"? That needs to be deleted. Is this an encyclopedia or a Trump rally? Cfinkbeiner1976 (talk) 20:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hoods"?