lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hubig's Pies

message: As the article was written before I started editing it, this article was about the pie itself rather than the company that makes the pies. It is my belief that it would be a better article if it focused on the company, so I'm going to rewrite it with that focus in mind. Please share your thoughts with me! 5oh4 (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company or the pie? 

message: I'm gathering references that can be incorporated into the article at some point. Please don't mess with this list. Feel free to add on. 5oh4 (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rounding up references 

message: Why is this classified as a restaurant? 73.240.237.13 (talk) 21:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restaurant? 

message: There back! But my mom went right when rouses opend, and they were almost sold out! 174.210.67.5 (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hubigs pies are back! But good luck getting your hands on them!
Talk:Standing Hampton

message: What the hell does the album title mean? I've wondered this for nigh unto thirty years. --Kaz 14:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standing Hampton? Sitting Ramada? 

message: Same here brohemian. Bob
"Hampton" is British slang for a penis.  Standing Hampton? - well, you get the picture. Runamok5150 23:47, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do you stand in the fashion of Hampton? 

message: Bill Champlin is thanked in the credits. Is this the Bill Champlin who was once in the band Chicago? Did he perform musically on this album? Gringo300 02:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Champlin
Talk:Dugda (Aanaa)

message: I believe the location of the Battle of Gogetti, the last battle of the Ethiopian army in the Second Italo-Ethiopian War, lay inside the borders of this woreda. According to et.geoview.info, its latitude & longitude are 8°10'59.99" & 38°34'59.98"; waiting on a better map of the woreda & a reliable source for its location to add it to the article. -- llywrch (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the Battle of Gogetti
Talk:Mart Crowley

message: Thanks for uploading or contributing to :Image:MartCrowley2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for [[:Image:MartCrowley2.jpg]]

message: While twenty years ago Boys in the Band might have been considered passe, by 2012, as the country enters a second Civil Rights Movement, the work has growing historical importance. It was a dramatic cross section of the last generation of gay men living in the closet, and resigned to that. It would make an excellent thesis topic in any American Studies course, now. Gay history, like black history in the Fifties, has become American history. Profhum (talk) 18:54, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opportunity for Research 

message: Is he openly gay? I could not find reliable sources online to verify. I wonder if anybody has published offline sources. If anybody has access to primary sources, like Crowley himself, make sure that his sexuality is open in published papers (newspaper or books). --George Ho (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I found out that I confused "Mart" with "Matt". Therefore, I found sources that must be reliable enough to confirm it. --George Ho (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowley's sexuality 

message: The above is uncited; I just skimmed the passage down into a version that implies a reference to the primary source without need of inline citation. --George Ho (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited info
Talk:Maurice Sachs

message: I've removed the following text (it's commented out in the article):
:But Sachs's true end was a lot less spectacular and romantic.  In 1945, before the advance of British troops, the prison of Fuhlsbüttel was evacuated and its inmates moved to the city of Kiel.  The evacuation consisted of a long march that took many days to complete.  On the third day of the journey, April 14, 1945, at 11:00 in the morning, Sachs became too exhausted to continue the march.  He was killed by a bullet through his neck, and his body was abandoned at the side of the road with the body of another "companion of the same misfortune." Said Emmanuel Pollaud-Dulian about Sachs, "He does not show much compassion for the Jewish people, and deplores their resignation, which seems to be the dominant feature of their character.  On the countryside, when passing a herd of sheep, he sighs sadly saying, 'the Jews...'  The drama he plays does not escape him.  But, trapped in his state of amorality, Sachs does not believe in the existence of innocent victims."
First, I can't find a source for any of it - I don't see this "Emmanuel Pollaud-Dulian" anywhere.  Second, it's pretty WP:POV.  If anyone can rewrite it to make sense, I would appreciate it! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV, etc 
Talk:Queen Margaret Academy

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article does not cite any sources and needs to be expanded. Pictures would also be good. Adam McCormick 05:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007 
Talk:List of moons by diameter

message: I think it'd be helpful to the article to explain at the beginning that the bolded moons are the rounder ones and which planets/groups the different colors mean. --Patteroast 19:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation? 

message: Where does the 364 BC date for the discovery of Ganymede come from? I didn't see it in the main article on Ganymede.
Raddick 13:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganymede discovery in 364 BC? 

message: What would people think about adding a mass column to the table?  The rank of moons by mass generally follows the rank of moons by diameters, but not always.  If people think this is a good idea, I have compiled the information for moons over 350 km in diameter.Caldust55 (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be better as a separate table, List of moons by mass.
RandomCritic (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To me, it is a difference between purity of presentation and usefulness to the reader. If we agree to add masses to the table in this article, it would also have to be done without compromising the readability of the table.  Not having any experience creating/editing tables, I'm not sure how this would come out.  Looking at the existing table again, there may not be room to add an additional column; possibly, this could be resolved by using the Diameter column for both diameter and mass.  The heading would read Diameter/Mass (km)/(kg).  The column entry for Ganymede would read 5262.4/1.4189 x 10.  If this would be too confusing, I'd just leave it as it is.
Caldust55 (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Masses to the Table? 

message: Should it be "Moon" or "Luna"
RJRocket53 (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The official astronomical name for the Earth's satellite varies by language.  That means that it's only "Luna" in Latin, Spanish, Italian, Ligurian, Sicilian, Romanian, Russian, Bulgarian, and Slovene.  In English it is "Moon". RandomCritic (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Sizes, Name Column
Talk:Pullman Square

message: Inline citations go directly after the punctuation. Go through the article and fix all occurrences. --Nehrams2020 20:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe all have been taken care of.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA comment

message: There is an infobox that might work well here: Template:Infobox_shopping_mall.  Any thoughts?  Justen 10:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't a mall with an anchor or many stores. It is considered more of a district than anything.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: Per comment left at the peer view: General editing help would be appreciated, especially in the Construction and opening sub, where it was recently converted from bullet to paragraph format. I will be doing minor edits to see if it can be managed easier, but sometimes a fresh pair of eyes can be better. I believe I have covered the history of the project extensively, and cannot see it being expanded further unless there are new articles (which appear almost weekly it seems).  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review comments
Talk:The Lottie Project

message: You've inspired me to come back and pitch in, Rintrah. I like co-operative editing but if you don't then let me know and I'll back off. :-)
* I hated my use of "contemporary" because it'll go out of date and I have the same problem with "present day" (although it's an improvement on "contemporary"). I decided "late 20th century" would be better. I hope you approve.
* "In history class, which she originally finds boring, she discovers a photo of a Victorian girl who looks identical to her, and then becomes interested in history." You've hugely improved this section but you've also slightly altered the sense. The original sense I found in the article here when I arrived her didn't specify where Charlie saw the photo. I'll leave this one because I don't know whether you've read the book (I haven't).
::* As there's been no response I'll change the sense back to the original. Random Passer-by 18:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit
Talk:Heritage Guitars

message: Sorry to be cynical, but this article reads like a commercial! 71.209.255.102 19:47, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are your thoughts now, and don't be sorry. Maybe it did, but thanks to a collaboration during an AfD, it ain't 'alf bad now, n'est pas? Btw, have added Heritage Guitars to "See also" section in :Gibson Guitar Corporation article for anyone who cares. :) Bubba hotep 23:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Pairing the H-575 to the Gibson ES-175 is a common misconception: their closest sibling is the L-4 CES. As matter of fact, they share the same key details:
* The carved top, instead of a laminated one;
* The pickup positions.
Fpasello (talk) 07:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the H-575
Talk:Stone Fleet

message: Were these ships actually commissioned into the Navy?  If not, then most of the USS designations are probably inappropriate.  --J Clear (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS 

message: The disambiguation page for USS_America says that the Stone Fleet ship was actually named American, but this article lists ships with both names, each in a different fleet and with different tonnage. Anybody know what's going on there? MolotovH (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation confusion
Talk:Thomas Bezanson

message: Nice start to the article, but we don't include titles/offices as part of article names, which makes the "Brother" part of this one problematic. I was going to just fix the capitalization issue, but I wanted to know; is it more appropriate from a "common name" standpoint to call him Brother Thomas Bezanson, Charles Bezanson, or something else? See :Category:Benedictines for examples of what other articles are listed under (which I think is usually birth name). -- nae'blis 19:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved now, based on a relatively brief Google search for what seems more common. It can be moved in the future if this proves to be inaccurate. -- nae'blis 15:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Forgotten war

message: I've heard and seen this term used to apply to many conflicts. Used as a pronoun it typically refers to the Korean War/Conflict, and sometimes by historians of the First World War to refer to their pet subject that is often over-looked by many other historians (over-shadowed by its 'sequel' perhaps). But I've also heard it being used as a general descriptive term for many different conflicts.
A History Channel documentary on the War of 1812 calls it "a forgotten war". Googling "forgotten war" brings up lots and lots of sites on Korea, but upon closer inspection also brings up a whole bunch of other topics. These include:
*The Spanish-American War
*The Mexican-American War
*Lebanon’s Civil War
*America's war with the Pirates of the Barbary Coast
Doing an identical search on Amazon reveals similar results: lots of books on Korea, but peppered with a surprising variety of books about other "forgotten wars". Some of these include:
*The Alaskan Front during WW2. 
*Revolution and Liberation conflicts in SE Asia
*Britain's 19th Century Colonial Campaigns
*The War of 1812 again (several items, sometimes called Our Forgotten War)
*Burma
*Conflict in DR of the Congo
*The Eastern Front of WW2 Between Stalin and Hitler
*Russia in Chechnya
*The current war in Afghanistan (used by both the BBC and Keith Olbermann in reference to its having been over-shadowed by media coverage of Iraq)
*Even the Iraq War (in a recent, 2006, op-ed article)
Googling "forgotten war" and adding "-Korea" still yields over 100,000 results. 
This is all plenty of justification, at least for me, that this disambiguation page should be fleshed out into a full article. I added some basic stuff to illustrate that this is not just an alias of Korea, but also a common pet name of many other conflicts, as well as a descriptive term/phrase/moniker in its own right. However, I think there is enough to warrant making this into a full article with greater depth, breadth, and considerable historiographic inquiry. Any one want to compile and organize this into an article?
I also would motion that someone immediately alter the redirect for "THE Forgotten War" to point to this disambiguation page, or else place a standard disambiguation tag to the Korea article.
Thelastemperor 19:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded... Make into Article
Talk:Art Complex Museum

message: this is a fine and significant regional art museum. true there needs to be more info in the article - but this is just a start...
:Okay, I've formatted it a bit and given you some breathing room, but we need to know why this museum is important. Sources and the importance of the Carl Weyerhaeuser collection will be very helpful... -- nae'blis 20:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Topicality (policy debate)

message: Is this meant to be understood by the layman or someone already steeped in policy debate?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.4.165.147 (talk) 11:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Jargon

message: I shortened the section on grammar because most of it was uncited and seemed to be fairly arbitrary. I also thought it was particularly objectionable to claim the argument had fallen out of use because debaters know less about it "than they think they do". Obviously, the section is a little short and awkward now, and could use some expansion. Galapagos29 20:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar

message: This section isn't exactly correct.  One can claim advantages based on a topical plan that are unrelated to the actual resolution (for instance, on the Alternative Energy topic one could read a plan that mandates the military fuel all vehicles via alternative energy by say 2020 and claim advantages based on US military effectiveness/US Hegemony (leadership)).  Extra topicality is when the aff reads a plan that proposes some sort of resolutionally based action AND something unrelated to the topic (using Alternative Energy once again, an extra-topical plan would be to do the plan i previously mentioned AND ratify CTBT.  -- False Prophet (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra-Topicality 

message: Isn't this (Reverse Voting Issue) the outcome of a critical response to a negative topicality argument?  How is this a separate type of response?  Any RVI is going to require critical argumentation to ever be considered seriously, or possibly at all. --69.209.70.4 (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Aff Answers: RVI

message: Most judges don't like it? I would say just showing why 5 judges doesn't prove it. There are some judges who like that argument.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.7.211.35 (talk) 03:00, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: RVI
Talk:Mikhail Tereshchenko

message: Що за російська транслітерація??????? Ніякий він не Міхаїл 2806:261:417:9481:A5F8:F226:7F38:54FE (talk) 05:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Змініть ім'я на Михайло
Category talk:Semitic-speaking peoples

message: This is stupid. There are no Semitic People, but there are only Semitic languages! Jews speak the Semitic language, Hebrew, but most of them (Ashkenazim and Jews of Spain/Portugal) have the look of Europeans, because they are Europeans. So how can you put them together along with Arabs? They have only a semitic language in common. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.68.234 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 2 January 2007‎
It's because Jews use to be Hebrews but now anyone can convert and be called a Jew but not be a Semite..I think the word "Jews" should be removed  and Hebrew left in it's place...by the way Arabs are Hebrews as well.-Mari   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.153.29.123 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 26 April 2007‎
@Mari,
Jews are commonly considered Semitic both culturally and genetically.
There is a definite link between language and culture. Throughout the Jewish diaspora, Jews have maintained their distinct Semitic culture to various degrees. This includes circumcision, which was common in the ancient Near East, as well as distinct music and cuisine, which was always different from that of the host populations.
Modern genetic studies have shown that the contribution of conversion over the years have been very small and that the majority of most Jewish communities, including Ashkenazim, show y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA originating in the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. As far as the look of Europeans, light hair and blue eyes are also common in Lebanon, with blue eyes reaching frequencies of up to 40%. This makes sense, as ancient Pheonecians and ancient Hebrews spoke mutually intelligible languages and were probably quite closely related genetically. Things like Tay-Sachs Disease and Haplogroup G2c, which are almost exclusive genetic signatures of the Ashkenazi population, prove the low rate of admixture  of host populations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population and of a common founder. The Aramaic substratum in the Yiddish language is linguistic evidence for a continued history between ancient Hebrews and modern Jews. - Eli (eblashko)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eblashko (talk • contribs) 20:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Validity

message: would this be better renamed as :Category:Semitic-speaking peoples, following the pattern of other sub-categories within :Category:Afroasiatic peoples? – Fayenatic London 10:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: yes that is very a good idea. Oncenawhile (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:It's Always 1999

message: I'm not sure that is an alternate cover. The CDr version had both of those....--Jonathan Williams 00:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really?  Then what would you call it? Drewcifer3000 02:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The back cover! Sorry I was unclear. --Jonathan Williams 18:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All fixed.  Thanks for the heads up. Drewcifer3000 20:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Cover
Talk:Zakhm

message: Once a screenshot, movie poster, or DVD cover is added, the film can be upgraded to start class for WP:Films. --Nehrams2020 01:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the poster and screenshots. Desiphral-देसीफ्राल 00:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years later, I have removed the two non-free screenshots since they do not comply with WP:FILMNFI. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs photo

message: TOI. Shahid • Talk2me 10:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Nicholas Dante

message: Added two links regarding the 1976 Pulitzer Prize for Drama that Nicholas Dante won for A Chorus Line. Alberto Sandoval-Sánchez (in José Can You See? Latinos On and Off Broadway) indicates that Dante was the first Latino to win this award.--Lawrlafo (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding information about Nicholas Dante's Pulitzer Prize
Talk:Nick Enright

message: One could read the entire article and still have no idea of his private life/sexuality at all.  That's because there's nothing about it.  Yet he's categorised as LGBT.  In order to support this categorisation, there must be some explicit material in the article about it.  It's not enough for the subject to buried in sources.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 20:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: LGBT mention in text - where is it?
Talk:Oscar Browning

message: I am working to expand this article into a full-scale biography. During the following days new detailed sections will appear. Any further ideas about how to improve the article will be welcome. Brianboulton (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion
Talk:Patrick Dennis

message: I don't have a dog in this fight one way or the other, but I thought that usual Wiki protocol would have had the article refer to him by his real name? 
I know his creative work is clearly known under pseudonyms, but there are also other aspects of his life discussed in the article....?  2603:8001:2A00:7428:E990:167A:CBE9:C6FD (talk) 04:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and will rewrite the article thus. Jhlechner (talk) 16:42, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick Dennis vs Edward Everett Tanner
Talk:List of municipalities in Minas Gerais

message: I agree with merging this pages. I think List of municipalities in Minas Gerais (MG), Brazil should be kept with the content of both pages (which are the same, by the way). Gcoliveira 20:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Rarelibra 21:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)