Talk:Wonder Man (Fox Publications)

message: Should this entry be renamed "Wonder Man (Fox)" or something like that? Also, I updated the name to "Wonder Man" in the main body, as I don't think "Wonderman" is correct.Roygbiv666 00:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this needs a disambiguation page. I've never heard of "Fox Publications" before, but I knew Eisner'd created him....  Trekphiler 11:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonder Man (comics) isn't about this character - it is to disambiguate the various Wonder Men. (Emperor 16:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

text: File:Foxwonder1th.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Creative Ambiguity

message: Who is "I" and what is the court case mentioned?  Wiki doesn't know.  Google doesn't know.  The article doesn't say.  Is it in reference to the King of Beers/Beer of Kings court case?  Bid?  What?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krystofor (talk • contribs) 12:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wonder Man (comics) isn't about this character - it is to disambiguate the various Wonder Men. (Emperor 16:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bid vs Bud court case

message: :File:Foxwonder1th.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Foxwonder1th.jpg

message: In May of 1939, Fox Features Syndicate's Wonder Comics #1 came out. This title's star hero was called Wonderman (no relation to the Marvel Comics' character Wonder Man). His powers were virtually identical to Superman's. In fact, Fox instructed the Eisner-Iger Shop create for him a “superman”. Victor Fox was not creating a homage of Superman, but with only minor changes in the concept of Wonderman, he was creating his own version of Superman. Even the cover of Wonder Comics #1 was a near-re-creation of Superman's first appearance in Action Comics #1.
This got DC Comics angry enough to file a copyright infringement case against the publisher, Victor A. Fox. The case went to court, Will Eisner testified against Fox. The court, in its decision of April 7, 1939 found, comparing Superman and Wonderman, that “there has been unfair use by Fox of DC’s copyrighted pictures and unfair paraphrase of DC’s text accompanying its pictures.”The judge decided in DC's favor (after the BID vs BUD court case, I doubt that DC could win that argument so easily today). At that time, Will Eisner was never paid over $1,000 (worth around $14,000 in today's market)Calculated using an online inflation calculator which cites Historical Statistics of the United States (USGPO, 1975) and the annual Statistical Abstracts of the United States. that Victor Fox owed him. The second issue Wonder Comics was published, but without Wonderman, and that would be the last of this title's run.
In his only appearance, radio engineer Fred Carson went to Tibet (as did The Shadow, Doctor Strange, and other comic heroes of the 1930s), and was awarded a magical ring (reminiscent of the Green Lantern and Seraph (comics)). Back at home, Fred's boss at the International Broadcasting Company, the gruff Mr. Hastings, has no use for the mild-mannered Fred, nor does Hastings' daughter Brenda, who works as a nurse at the hospital Wonderman saved. Headstrong and spoiled, she was Carson's dream-girl. Brenda was also engaged to the rich, snobbish playboy Reggie Berold, who believes Wonderman is a threat!
Roygbiv666 (talk) 20:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Text from [[Wonderman]]