Talk:Ben Going

message: Talk page entries previous to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_April_16 can be viewed in page's edit history. Ichormosquito 04:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There aren't any peacock terms.  If you are referring to the AP quote, it establishes notability in the face of a veritable ocean of similar, less notable YouTubers. Ichormosquito 01:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peacock tag

message: I read it again, and the only thing close to fancruft might be the Vegemite stuff.  It's independently noted by two sources, though.Ichormosquito 02:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fansite"

message: Someone needs to remove this tag; it's been removed twice already.  According to Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, that's one too many times. Ichormosquito 02:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod delete

message: review has been established. this page needs expert attention as Ichormosquito is attempting to block a review Sexyorge 03:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: article on vlogger needs a clear review by peers. While the "consensus" for deletion was addressed, various users and contributors comments were censored and removed. Terms like sockpuppet and meatpuppet were used to dismiss contributors who clearly stated their opinion on the status of boh3m3(Ben_Going). This article lacks Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not on several levels. I am asking for a review / expert attention on Ben_Going, as well as wikipedia peers user:Ichormosquito who is trying to vandalize this review, article and harass me personally regarding this topic/debate. Thank you. I do have further arguments, however wanted to keep this on review/topic and to the point. Sexyorge 03:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I did not try to block a review.  Editors can check the edit history.  There wasn't a review, so I removed the templates. Ichormosquito 07:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *sorry i lost my password. anyway, here is the deal
*http://www.boh3m3.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=2162
----  that is my entire argument on why the article is bias, advertising and needs review. Heideggger 17:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: There is nothing wrong with recruiting experts to help write an article.  If one looks at the deletion review and my 6 post history at boh3m3.net, any objective viewer will excuse me.  Nothing bad happened.  Did I recruit people for the AfD?  No.  In fact, his detractors had meatpuppets in spades.  Stop taunting me and read up on WP:CIVIL.  Thanks. Ichormosquito 22:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i apologize for any confusion. i must be in the wrong, however there is a tendency for you to lash out at anyone that disgagrees with you in a civial way. i read up on Wikipedia:Five_pillars and i'll take your good faith that you meant the "best" when you actively promoted boh3m3 and other youtube celebrities for wikipedia in order to "flesh them out". consider checking out ethics. regardless it's clear this needs further review Heideggger 22:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: expert, bias, POV talk [[User:Ichormosquito|Ichormosquito]]

message: well Heidegger - that forum thread is very telling - and when ichormosquito said in the thread "Wiki admins can be bitches" - i personally felt very offended.. someone who thinks that way doesn't deserve an account on this fine site.  Shoopshoop 18:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Admins often have the same opinion of each other; so long as they don't express their opinions here, and I didn't, they're in the clear.  Please stop adding this nonsense to an article's discussion page. Ichormosquito 20:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also want to say "sorry" to any admins who see this; I didn't know what I was talking about. Ichormosquito 02:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

text: You'll have to say a lot worse to bother me. (smile)  Personally, I don't think comments off wiki, short of actual threats, should affect what we say or do here. The reason we don't use forums as sources is because people say all sorts of things--that's their very purpose. Here, in contrast, we're supposed to be responsible, and to edit and judge articles on their merits, not on who supports or opposes them. DGG 05:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ben Going. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070223084559/http://www.nypost.com:80/seven/11122006/business/video_venom_business_peter_lauria.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/11122006/business/video_venom_business_peter_lauria.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070911051046/http://www.adweek.com:80/aw/iq_interactive/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003494877 to http://www.adweek.com/aw/iq_interactive/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003494877
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090307104020/http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=4b3PkL8HQcw to https://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=4b3PkL8HQcw
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ben Going. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14869770/site/newsweek/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15227651/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120618050941/http://www.savetheinternet.com/ to http://www.savetheinternet.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified