Talk:KitchenAid

message: KitchenAid is a quite well-respected company and their products are ubiquitous in American kitchens. I'm surprised at how small this article is.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.242.51 (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I removed content recently added to the history section because it lacked sources and was written in a style that suggested it was based on the editor's personal experience and opinion. The material could be a useful contribution to the article but not without reliable sources to support it. Jojalozzo 18:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The paragraph before the one you added references a book which does not appear to be marketing material. The content you added had no sources and, because of that, is not appropriate for the article. Please review the editorial guidelines I have linked about sources and original research before responding. You may also benefit from reading through the material that's listed in the welcome message on your talk page. There is a learning curve to be scaled before you can be an effective Wikipedia editor but it's not rocket science - it just requires some diligence. (BTW, you can sign your talk page posts with four tildes: ~~~~.) Jojalozzo 18:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

text: The source you provided does not support any of the statements made in the content you added. Also please be aware that you have now hit the 3 revert limit without properly discussing your edits here on the talk page. As I said, Wikipedia editing requires some familiarity with the guidelines and you are not demonstrating much of that. Continuing as you are is likely to get you blocked from editing. Jojalozzo 19:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

text: 1. the book cited does not discuss the marketing material cited to it. 
2. The content I cited provides perfect support. it shows the plethora of parts that are not cross compatible across models. Again, the point of the edit is to provide balance to the material inserted to market the product that is the subject of the article - i.e. that "every accessory is compatible with every machine". This was probably true once upon a time, but is simply not true any more. Hence the material in the article is not correct and needs to be expanded to be more accurate. Yahooter (talk) 19:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content in History section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on KitchenAid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111027083014/http://www.kitchenaid.com/assets/pdfs/press/1342500_KAtimeline.pdf to http://www.kitchenaid.com/assets/pdfs/press/1342500_KAtimeline.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This wobbly I’ll fitting plastic piece that is apparently supposed to protect my bowl shredded during use. I was making a smoothie with lime, very small ripe and previously frozen lime so it was soft soft, which I cut it eight wedges, 1/3 cup of chia seeds pre soaked in three cups water and two mini cucumbers cut up. The plastic “guard” was shredded to smithereens. 
Why on earth include such a useless and potentially dangerous attachment without thorough testing?!
Please make me whole!
Erinealrybird@gmail.com 2001:56A:FB13:700:E0E0:6517:6CD3:9B3D (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kitchenaid hand mixer plastic attachment