Talk:Libjpeg

message: I don't think that "a common problem" paragraph is necessary--after all, if the last version is from 1998, who would have upgrading problems? Furthermore, it doesn't seem to fit in Wikipedia.
Kimastergeorge 04:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this is not in Wikipedia's scope per WP:NOT; I'm removing it. -- intgr [talk] 09:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrading problems 

message: It looks like the www.ijg.org site has changed (maybe it changed owners).  The link should be removed if it is no longer relevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.118.71.78 (talk) 02:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website URL? 

message: Crop is not supported by this library natively. Many (but not all) operating systems have patched the library to add crop support. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475679 I suggest crop on this page be noted as such. magicalspirits (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Crop is supported natively in libjpeg7 and above 2A01:E35:2F45:9A0:223:14FF:FE3E:4490 (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crop 

message: This "reference" is full of insane ramblings:
 Contributed document - Word .doc file: Evolution of JPEG
 http://jpegclub.org/temp/Evolution_of_JPEG.doc
It goes on about AC and DC current with references to Thomas Edison, something about God... in any case it is not a technical document.
The submitter's prior Wikipedia edits need to be examined for similar... whatever you call it.
208.118.25.22 (talk) 08:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks pretty technical to me, until the last section (7.4), when it goes off into an opinionated tangent, but not "insane ramblings"... AnonMoos (talk) 12:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

text: You can use Wikipedia as a reference for the presented facts: War of Currents. The "God" part is a citation of the basic message of Barry Long. See http://www.barrylongweb.com/home_en.html. Guido Vollbeding (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia abuse 

message: Guetzli is a hopeless stub, maybe it could be merged here for comparison with Mozjpeg. –2.247.247.5 (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If the article's sourcing passed the WP:GNG criteria, I would be all for it. But the sources are either not independent, or not reliable, so I have to wonder if it deserves to be on Wikipedia in the first place. -- intgr [talk] 17:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guetzli 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Libjpeg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120901070906/http://filmicgames.com/archives/778 to http://filmicgames.com/archives/778
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140812062122/http://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/README-turbo.txt?format=raw to https://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/README-turbo.txt?format=raw
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: libjpeg has been on the path of doom ever since they decided to break the ABI. Now that libjpeg-turbo is one of ISO & ITU's reference JPG implementations, maybe the time has come to make it the main topic of the article. Artoria2e5 Contributions/Artoria2e5 03:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Libjpeg" is the historical origin, and the others started as forks from it.  Not sure whether it's the "main topic", but as long as they're all covered in the same article, then libjpeg will be logically and chronologically be discussed first... AnonMoos (talk) 21:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the IJG libjpeg still deserve to be the main topic?