lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:APM Terminals

message: Three of the images used in this article ,  and  are tagged as User-created GFDL, that is created by the uploader and released for free use.
However, all three images are exactly the same as the ones on the company website here]. This strongly suggests the images are wrongly tagged and a breach of copyright. I would welcome any other comments, especially from the image uploader User:Bertatmindcomet. If no comments or contrary views are received I will correctly retag them. 
We will then have a second issue - whether their continued inclusion in the article can be justifed as fair use. I would argue no, as they are purely decorative and add nothing to our understanding of APM Terminals' operation or sites. Other views on this point would also be welcome.  Euryalus (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Copyright Problem
Talk:Global Information Network

message: Ran into this website, obviously has nothing to do with the article and is in all likelihood a scam. Still, because of the shared name, some information probably should be added about this website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.237.5.170 (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://www.globalinformationnetwork.com/
Talk:Black Hawk (nightclub)

message: Sections about the career's of Nick Esposito and Billie Holiday deviated from the Black Hawk and the outline of the various albums recorded their contained POV statements which were inappropriate for a Wikipedia article. Philip Cross (talk) 11:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of material
Talk:GER Class T19 Rebuilt

message: I suggest merging GER Class T19 and GER Class T19 Rebuilt. Biscuittin (talk) 14:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I will do this, and merge the LNER Class D13 article as well, as all 3 are highly linked and there is nowhere near enough information to warrant three articles on one type of train, even if there is some variety in the train.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeno94 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Oblates of St. Joseph

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: It is important to keep a separate article about the institution. Alexander Tendler (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance of the institution
Talk:Park Top

message: This is not NPOV.  Please fix this.  WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENwe need to talk.• 15:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Mouse Morris

message: Certainly a big improvement. I knew absolutely nothing about Morris's riding career, so it was interesting as well. I think a good next step would be to replace the "Infobox sportsman" with "Infobox horseracing personality". You can see an example of how it looks at Henry Cecil. It's a good little template, but hardly anyone ever uses it. I would make very sparing use of the man's own website as it isn't independent of the subject. The Racing Post website is excellent for results and stats since 1988, for example . It would be interesting to get a source on how he came by the "Mouse" nickname. I think we also need a reference to War Of Attrition, who gave Mouse his finest hour. Tigerboy1966  21:55, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Much improved. Always been a fan of his and good to see the article shaping up now. I've fixed some links today and taken out some of the more descriptive words but in general terms this isn't bad.--Bcp67 (talk) 13:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: It's strange to have information about his mother having been a cryptographer, and not mentioning any normal info, like her name...85.157.155.247 (talk) 07:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have added additional information regarding his mother Finnegas (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother's name 
Talk:Ariccia

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 13:44, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:Arsoli

message: I noticed that in recent years some contributors have repetedly added comment to the page which do not comply with the standard of objetivity of Wikipedia. These comments appear to be needlessy critic and sarcastic about the town described in the page. By proceeding to their correction, I would like to highlight that, in my point of view, it is possible to report critics to the lak of attractivity of the place in object in a neutral way, maybe by citing appropiate sources that talk about it. The comment appended to the page seem more appropriate for a Nonciclopedia entry than awikipedia one. Thanks Davids music (talk) 14:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-neutrality of the english version of the page
Talk:Bracciano

message: I cannot say what "famous" and "remarkable" are to mean in the "Main Sights" section.  On this basis every aviation museum would have "famous" planes and "remarkable" collections - which is not the case, as a matter of fact.
In aviation museums, famous can be documented by an owner or an event.  What would be "remarkable" would be to find three plywood Mosquito bombers in an Italian Air Force aviation museum.  Did any one of those aircraft "place" in a Schneider Cup race ?
For a visitor to Italy from England, what would be remarkable about an aviation museum with Schneider cup race planes?
G. Robert Shiplett 18:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup, please
Talk:Colleferro

message: I changed the "British company" Simmel Defense into the Italian company Simmel Difesa. I see no evidence on the Simmel Difesa website or wp page that it is British; furthermore "Defense" is not the British spelling. I would be delighted to be proven wrong, with reliable references. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 15:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simmel Defense?
Talk:Griffon (dog type)

message: Why is the default entry for Griffon a fuckin dog breed?
What is this insanity? Since when are mythological beasts with leonine bodies and eagle heads / wings defined as "dogs"?
For that matter, can't people tell the difference between a Griffin, a Griffon and a Hippogriff?
:(1)People might be able to tell the difference between a griffin, a griffon and a hippogriff, but they may lack the extensive vocabulary that some possess, or they may be spelling impaired. --Bejnar (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: (2) What do you consider to be the primary topic for "griffon"? Take a look at Griffon (disambiguation) and Gryphon (disambiguation). --Bejnar (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is bullshit 
Talk:Bunscoill Ghaelgagh

message: :You are an important school. Apologies for the deletion proposal... this should be reversed. Please ask at the schools project if you need help. Any chance of some pictures? An extract from a Manx laguage class? History of how the school was created? Well done ... more please Victuallers (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Yes, Tywald Hill is an important site in Manx history, but why put it in the box on this page?  Why not a picture of the school itself, or lacking that, no picture at all?  Are the classes taught on Tywald Hill?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.88.170.40 (talk) 19:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a picture of Tynwald hill? 
Talk:Formello

message: There's been some kind of a mixup, no doubt from inattention to the article. There are no supporting sources. The community is not in the regional park and is not the site of the ancient city of Veii, which is now recognized by the government to have been at Isola Farnese on the other bank of the Tiber. As I am not working on this right now I am placing modest number of tags.Dave (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, what has happened is the coordinates are off. So, I'm removing the tags and being a little more specific as well as finding the right coordinates. I know The "coordinates" template description advises us not to be too precise in the coordinates. I have no idea what that can possibly mean since this imprecision leads to misidentification.Dave (talk) 09:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixup
Talk:Pyrylium

message: "The carbon to oxygen double bond is also an oxonium ion...."  I don't see how a bond can be an ion, or vice versa, considering that ions have mass, and bonds don't. Could it be that "is" isn't the right verb here? Unfree (talk) 07:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It depends on what your definition of "is" is

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pyrylium salt →  – Unnecessary qualification for an organic compound; cf. Thiopyrylium. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 October 2023
Template talk:Terriers

message: OK, I looked, I cannot find any reputable, major multi-breed kennel clubs that subdivide terriers in this manner (Hunting / Fighting / Companion-Toy / Working) although I have not looked at negligibly small registries or the puppy mill and for-pay 'registries' where you can pretty much 'register' anything anyway you want.
I also do not find any recognized authority on terriers that divides them up this way.
Here are relevant links:
Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI): has a Terrier Group; sections "Large and medium-sized Terriers", "Small-sized Terriers", "Bull type Terriers", "Toy Terriers". (http://www.fci.be/nomenclatures.asp?lang=en&sel=0)
The Kennel Club (Kennel Club UK): has a Terrier Group, does not subdivide terriers into categories. "The Kennel Club was founded in 1873 and is the governing body of dogs in the United Kingdom."(http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/1199) 
American Kennel Club: has a Terrier Group, does not subdivide terriers into categories.(http://www.akc.org/breeds/terrier_group.cfm). AKC is the largest and second oldest purebred dog registry in the world. http://www.akc.org/press_center/facts_stats.cfm?page=all_about_AKC
United Kennel Club (UKC): has a Terrier Group, does not subdivide terriers into categories. (http://mail.ukcdogs.com/ukcweb.nsf/96504b0ba215c6748525703f00533f5f/2f533a934d18c7bf852570bb00542abf?OpenDocument)
Canadian Kennel Club (CKC): has a Terrier Group, does not subdivide terriers into categories. (http://www.ckc.ca/en/Default.aspx?tabid=99&groupCode=04)
Japan Kennel Club: has a Terrier Group, does not subdivide terriers into categories. http://www.jkc.or.jp/modules/worlddogs/category.php?categoryID=3  
I would suggest eliminating the sections altogether as they are not generally used. Alternately, the FCI sections would be more in keeping with Wikipedia's use of no original research and striving for verifiable accuracy.
Hafwyn (talk) 23:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info from registries 

message: I believe the grouping of terrier breeds by FCI section is too restrictive, I can see the intent which is an obvious improvement upon the previous groupings, but it is too focused on the European breeds and the show dog fanciers groupings to the detriment of the working and general pet owning communities.
Instead I propose grouping the breeds into:
* Working terriers, with sub-groups of:
** Long legged
** Short legged
* Bull breeds
* Toy breeds
* Miscellaneous (if required)
* Types
* Extinct breeds
Cavalryman V31 (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groupings
Template talk:Hounds

message: How come some breeds (such as Finnish Spitz and Ibizan Hound) seem to show up on the template on some pages, but not on others? For example: Hungarian Hound's hounds nav shows these breeds, whereas English Foxhound does not.  10:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh wait, it seems some pages show these breeds as "other" and others show them as scent hounds. It's still wierd though, the fact that it's the same template.  10:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I think I just found out. On the pages which showed the breeds as scent hounds, the table had been put in manually. Still, Finnish Spitz doesn't seem to be on the template...  10:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  differing breeds
Talk:Baku pogrom

message: a deleted citation from a reliable source was readded. Andranikpasha (talk) 18:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled]

message: Why does the date in the infobox differ from the dates n the text? Boneyard90 (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 
Talk:Greater Metropolitan Area (Costa Rica)

message: These sentences:
:Also, this metro area is more compatible with the urban area concept, because a proper metropolitan area definition applied in this case should include some cities englobed in the conurbation of San Jose nowadays should include the cities of Alajuela, Heredia and Cartago, but this is not currently accepted by the authorities, given the status of this cities as provincial capitals too.
Simply aren't true - at least not in full - because the GAM population measurement does, indeed, include that of Alajuela from everything I've found.  This probably needs to be deleted or corrected if it doesn't include the cantons in the other areas. --Criticalthinker (talk) 07:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole article is a mess, starting with its name, because the "San José metropolitan area" is not a specifically defined area. Furthermore, as the article does correctly state, the Gran Área Metropolitana spans 4 provinces, not just San José, and certainly not just the city or canton of San José Apolo2400 (talk) 22:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support as per WP:PRECISE (current title isn't really precise enough), which overrides WP:CONCISE here. Also, you have correctly deduced that "Greater" works better here. I am open to other suggested titles. Red Slash 02:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Anthea Turner: Perfect Housewife

message: This stub ought to go away, & any info in it that's not already on Anthea Turner's article should be relocated there. I don't think this TV show merits its own article unless someone is able to add a great deal more info on it than it contains at the moment. ScarletRibbons (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Not Needed 
Talk:10th Airlift Squadron

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: http://www.thenewstribune.com/topstories/story/759845.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=3297259
::A McChord Air Force Base commander was sentenced to 11 months in prison and a dismissal from the service after he was found to have had inappropriate sexual contact with a male staff sergeant during a deployment to Turkey.
This was a 10th guy... - // - Proxy User (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commander Convicted
Talk:Attack on the Saudi Embassy in Khartoum

message: Per WP:WPBIO this article is not within the scope of this project. Removed WPBIO tag. C. Williams (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope of WikiProject Biography

message: In 2011, the United States confirmed that Arafat was responsible for the attack.  Haaretz also gives a lot of info on the attack.  This info can be found here.
Here is a diplomatic note from the State Department regarding Black September/Fatah connection.
The book Assassination in Khartoum deals with this attack.
--Activism1234 18:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It is stated that "United States also tried to prosecute Yasser Arafat in the United States for his role in event".  But no where in the article does it refer to Arafat having any involvement!  If the USA sayd he did this should be mentioned.203.184.41.226 (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references
Talk:Playa Grande, Costa Rica

message: Hi,  and . There is a reference error showing in the References section. See if you can figure it out. A URL is lackig a title within a citation. Ping me back. You can copy/paste my signature (including the 4 curly braces) to ping me.  {Talk} 05:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference error
Talk:Pomezia

message: According to the Aurunci article, the Aurunci (an Italic tribe related to the Osci, Umbri, Latini, etc.) allied with this city, but this article doesn't mention that at all. The article about the Osci also says that "Pometia" (Latin name of Pomezia) "rebelled against Roman authority". Livy says in his "From the Founding of the City" (Book 2, 16) that Pometia rebelled and that "the whole war was centered round Pometia". Should it therefore be added to the history section? πr2 (t • c) 16:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Or is Suessa Pometia different from modern "Pomezia"? πr2 (t • c) 16:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hardly a reliable source, but the Latin Wikipedia has :la:Suessa Pometia as a redirect to :la:Pometia. The German Wikipedia says "Der Name Pomezia leitet sich von der antiken Stadt Suessa Pometia her, die nach Plinius zu Beginn des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. von den Volskern zerstört wurde. Diese gab auch der Tribus Pomptina den Namen. Es ist nicht gesichert ob Suessa Pometia tatsächlich im Gemeindegebiet lag." (you can translate using Google Translate). Maybe this should at least be mentioned? Waiting for comments. πr2 (t • c) 16:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aurunci
Talk:Military history of the Old Swiss Confederacy

message: This Old Swiss Confederacy entry is plagiarized almost word for word from Osprey's Swiss at War 1300-1500 by Douglas Miller. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.133.174 (talk • contribs) 16:06, January 2, 2008 (UTC)
:It's a copyright violation. Miller, Douglas: The Swiss at War 1300 - 1500, Osprey Publishing Ltd, Oxford, 1979. Lupo 08:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pixar Short Films Collection, Volume 1

message: This short is not on volume 1, it's on volume 2. Teknomage (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Your Friend the Rat

message: this section seems redundant, as all that information should appear already on each film's individual page already. SpikeJones (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Films Included

message: Why is it called Volume 1 like there is (or will be another volume soon)? There isn't enough content yet to merit a second volume. They should've just removed the "Volume 1" part. MHarrington (talk) 04:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Volume 1?

message: *DVD Talk review
*PopMatters review
*IGN review
*Reel Film review
*News Blaze review
*The Wisdom of Pixar: An Animated Look at Virtue
 — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Arktika (1972 icebreaker)

message: What is the relevance of the coordinates  at the top right of the page? They seem to locate to a random position in the middle of the Arctic Ocean. 86.160.215.239 (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Move executed following consensus after this  talk. --Robertiki (talk) 08:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 June 2016 move 