Talk:Sea Monsters (TV series)

message: Isn't it a little pointless to list the "hazards" for each segment when there is already a list of shown creatures (including the "hazards", so these creatures are listed twice) at the bottom of each description?  Jerkov 15:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One could point out the hazards amongst the already present lists. Jerkov 17:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hazards" 

message: The filming location for the Cretacious was in the
Bahamas (when nigel rides the archelon)but does anyone know 
about the place where the part where the T.rex is standing at 
the shore was filmed? Someone must edit the prehistoric park 
article. Last time I checked it was horrible. 
Still thinking about pterosaurs.
T.Neo 16:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming locations 

message: :Image:Wws.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wws.jpg

message: In the article it says that Nigel's time-travelling device is not mentioned or shown, but I think it's a pretty safe bet that he uses a time portal like in Prehistoric Park.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.169.168 (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This movie was ludicrous. But I always wondered how he traveled through time...--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Time-travelling device

message: The unidentified theropod in this programme is never identified as Lilliensternus in programme or the book, which identifies it as a Ceolurosaur.  Besides, the creature seen is not large enough to be Lilliensternus. Could whoever keeps naming this creature Lilliensternus please stop, as this naming is clearly original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frazthespaz (talk • contribs) 16:29, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obviously just the Coelophysis model from WWD anyways.--98.163.25.85 (talk) 08:15, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lilliensternus 

message: The article mentions that the series is available as part of another series on Netflix, but it does not appear to be available now in the US. Maybe it has been taken off of Netflix's lists. Highly time-sensitive things like Netflix listings, which change monthly, should probably be listed on the article itself with an "As of March, 2015," or other appropriate time marker.
27.140.141.211 (talk) 01:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netflix distribution