lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria

message: Greti123 (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 December 2021 

message: The introduction says, "His assassination in Sarajevo is was the most immediate cause of World War I." The "is was" part doesn't look like it is correct. I think it should be "was". 
Mscreations (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been . DonIago (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Editors supported various alternatives titles, including the current one, with no consensus for any of them. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria →  – Isn't he the only Archduke Franz Ferdinand? Jishiboka1 (talk) 05:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Austria has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 14:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 May 2022 

message: Photo of his visit to Canton.
https://hpcbristol.net/visual/Hv40-43 222.152.178.243 (talk) 07:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferdinand in Canton, China on Monday, 24 July, 1893 

message: — Assignment last updated by WingstopRanchFan (talk) 02:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Fall 2023 HIST 401

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. you are completely correct; withdrawing. (closed by non-admin page mover) HouseBlastertalk 13:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria →  – WP:SOVEREIGN says that  and . HouseBlastertalk 01:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 December 2023
Talk:Ulster Scots dialect

message: I came to this article (again) from a comment on the article Ä about how a-diaeresis is being used in some new orthographies of Ulster Scots, but there's very little information about orthography like one might find in other articles about languages or dialects. It would be good if someone who knows more about it could expand this article further in that regard. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 13:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also like to see some information about orthography. As a speaker of (Scottish) Scots I find the orthography quite difficult to parse sometimes and most of it seems to have no historical context.  SaoiDunNeachdain (talk) 15:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthography? 

message: This article contains a hell of a lot of information about the status of Ulster Scots, about how many (or few) people speak it, about its revival movement and whether the language they cultivate has the right to be called 'Scots'. But there is nothing about the language itself. Imo, the core of every article about a linguistic variety should be about its properties. How is it different from Lowlands Scots? How is it related to the various Lowlands (sub)dialects? Are there any internal differences, and if yes, to what extent? Was the dialect influenced by Ulster Irish, and to what extent? I expect to find the answers to questions like these in an article about Ulster Scots, especially when it's so long. Steinbach (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would really appreciate a reply. Steinbach (talk) 08:44, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total lack of linguistic information 

message: 1. The section of the "new orthographies" that starts with "It is certainly" and ends with "counter-intuitive and false" should have quotation marks around it since the text is a quotation.
2. It is not clear to me why the excerpts under "sample texts" by Barney Maglone and Robert Huddleston should have spacing between lines. The excerpt by Hugh Porter doesn't.
ICE77 (talk) 16:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting: quotation and excerpts
Wikipedia talk:Quickpolls/Initial proposal resolved issues

message: I have to rush (it's a workday) and have not had time to think this through properly yet. On the whole, I think this is probably the best way forward but I have several reservations:
* The proposed percentages need refinememt. At present, it says 10 votes and over 80% — i.e., 9 votes out of 10. Shouldn't that be 80% or over?
**Fixed.—Eloquence
***Changed rather than fixed - no way to tell how many of those who voted yes did so because they wanted a 9 out of 10 result. Jamesday 15:50, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Tannin's issues (resolved)

message: Martin wrote: I'm confused: anyone can request arbitration, according to our proposed wikipedia:arbitration policy
: That is correct. The proposed "referral to arbitration" remedy is merely intended to give an additional sense of urgency and community support to any such arbitration request.—Eloquence 22:43, Mar 15, 2004 (UTC)
:: OK, I've edited the page to make this clearer - hope that's ok. Martin 23:03, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: One of Martin's issues (resolved)
Talk:Consciousness (artificial)

message: There's a link (Proposed mechanisms for AC implemented by computer program: absolutely dynamic systems) in the Consciousness (artificial) article to a web page that contains a link to http://tkorrovi.sourceforge.net/di32bin.exe, I downloaded, installed and ran this program on my PC running Windows XP. It loaded without error. I read the associated .rtf document but I'm afraid there is no functional description or user guide for the operation of the program, so it is not clear to me what it can do or what it is supposed to do. Matt Stan 22:41, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: AC Software Program

message: The link to Christopher Nolan is to the wrong Christopher Nolan. See .
The synopsis of the book Under The Eye of The Clock, taken from amazon, is:
A book originally published in 1987 about a handicapped child, Joseph Meehan. It tells of Joseph's fight to escape the restrictions and confines of his existence inside a broken body. The book is largely autobiographical.
Question: what is the wikipedia convention for disambiguating aritcles about two people who have the same name? Matt Stan 22:41, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Christopher Nolan
Talk:Alan Cox (computer programmer)

message: born??
: Yes Alan Cox (talk) 16:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  born? 

message: I'd much prefer "while", as I have never seen "whilst" before.  Whilst this is not the "simple English" encyclopedia, we shouldn't needlessly scare away readers.
PS: I tried googling for whilst, and it seems the (major) hits are mostly people explaining the word, whilst the hits for while are people using the word.--Per Abrahamsen 19:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean "while"...  Peter O. (Talk) 19:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  While vs. whilst 

message: Can someone add information regarding his current Linux Kernel involvement (Sept 2006)? I remember reading (and it is mentioned in the article) that Alan was taking time off to work on his MBA, but it looks like he is involved in the Linux mailing list again (I have seen some e-mails from him on KernelTrap.org). What is his present involvement?
:He completed his MBA. He's still at Red Hat and he's still doing kernel stuff. Unfortunately, I am not a WP:RS and offhand I cannot find something repeating this which I could quote. Sorry! Telsa (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present Linux Kernel Involvement 

message: The opening paragraph is actually also mentioned in a printed book (Rebel Code). You can read a quote from the book (and read a reference to it) on http://twenty.sucs.org/TheSociety/About#wikitext under "A Brief History".
144.32.126.11 (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early involvement in Linux at Swansea University 

message: The version 18:26, 30 December 2020‎ Monkbot of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing article there.--Wing (talk) 10:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation into Chinese Wikipedia
Talk:Lanškroun

message: According to the town's homepage, this is the historical Kronland and the birthplace of Jan Marek Marci.  Some webpages give "Landskron" as the Czech equivalent of "Kronland".  While "Landskron"may have been occasionally used for "Lanskroun", it may also be a mistaken identification of "Kronland" with the Austrian town of "Landskron". Jorge Stolfi 22:58, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Svartálfar

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Vanaheimr - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Liberal Party of Canada leadership elections

message: It would be great if we could add info on which losing candidates in 1919, 1968, 1984 and 1993 were dropped or withdrew and gave their support to which other candidates Formeruser-83 23:55, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Perhaps the article should mention that at the last convention most delegates had no choice on the first ballot.  Elected delegates, the vast majority, were elected as either a Martin delegate or a Copps delegate (although I believe there were some independent delegates).  If one was a Martin delegate, one was handed a pre-marked Martin ballot for the first round.  I believe that candidates were not bound after the first round but with only two major candidates (and Martin's huge vitory), there was no second round.  --JGGardiner 22:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2003 Convention
Talk:Crisis of the Third Century

message: Philip and his Philip II should be a dynasty, and the same applies to Gallus and Volusian. 2001:8003:2810:8A00:C979:3181:FAF5:B8BE (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The table is inconsistent in describing emperors as 'dynastic' and 'non-dynastic' 

message: The current article doesn't reflect modern scholarly works on the topic. Work really ought to be done on it by someone who is an expert in the topic. Whole sections are also muddled: the "history" section is largely unsourced, the causes section should really cite a good secondary source than the collection of websites that it currently does, the subsection on natural disasters therein seems to be a collection of news articles, etc. Ifly6 (talk) 21:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ifly6 I agree, so why not give it a try, you can't just wait for experts. Rjdeadly (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Roman empire after , maybe with some extension out to Claudius, is not my field. Someone who has an actual interest in the post-Severan period should contribute. I, frankly, find the whole Roman Empire historically tedious. Ifly6 (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Ifly6 unlikely to happen then Rjdeadly (talk) 17:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite, or substantial reworking, needed
Talk:Lists of radio stations in North America

message: All Wikipedia articles on radio stations in the United States in the lists of radio stations in specified U.S. states that this page links to are at the station's callsign. However, at Omaha, Nebraska there are several ghost links to radio station monikers. Does anyone have any suggestions?? 66.245.81.205 20:15, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio station article titles (callsign vs. moniker) 

message: I have been looking through the state pages, and they are all differently organized.  CT's page, for example, has the town the station is based in.  AK's page, on the other hand, has only what company owns the station.  What is the accepted format for these pages?
Personally I support them sorted by market, then frequency (such as the List of radio stations in Manitoba). Leave the ownership info to the individual station pages when completed. Kirjtc2 04:43, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homogenization of State Pages 

message: Those interested in this subject might want to go give input at the new Wikipedia:Broadcasting notability, which is a suggested guideline. --Jacquelyn Marie 15:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Only slightly off-topic
Talk:Thespis

message: Material added in my edit summarized as "merging" on 15 March 2004 was in fact contributed at Thespus: its contributors can be found at that article's page history (that article is now a redirect). Jwrosenzweig 00:57, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The Sports Night episode, and its mention in this article, references November 23, 534 BC as the date of Thespis' first performance.  Is that confirmed, (and thus should be included in the main part of the article), or was that invented for the show?  Nerrolken (talk) 00:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Relying on Sports Night is an iffy proposition at best. How anyone could determine that Thespis did what he did on 23 Nov. is a complete mystery. A character on this show once stated absolutely that Napoleon was murdered on Elba (that's what he said - I promise!) Aaron Sorkin is a know-it-all who doesn't know much, so never rely on anything you hear on this stupid show.209.179.21.14 (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  November 23 

message: This article is almost completely unreferenced and is full of weasel words.  Assessment: Start.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: There is not, any way, reference to Thespis in Aristoteles's Poetics 84.101.98.210 (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ?? Did you just admit to completely making up a source? You suck. 77.165.250.227 (talk) 17:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thespis and Aristoteles
Talk:Sergius Paulus

message: If my oral family history is correct, Sergius was exiled from Rome to Germania for his faith. This might explain why Paul does not salute him in the Letter to the Romans. 
This is only an oral history that has been passed down for quite a few generations. I do not swear that it actually occurred, but evidence of the Church being in the region of Germany to which he was supposedly exiled prior to AD 100 does tend to support it though.
: Oral history handed down almost 2 millennia; that is impressive. -- llywrch (talk) 07:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems like many sources give the name as Paullus, a spelling that also appears in the painting by Raphael and in the article itself. Aviad2001 (talk) 09:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, is it Paulus or Paullus?  

message: Mitford's article in Annual of the British School at Athens has an interesting passage: "The problem is further complicated by an inscription from Kythrea of the Julio-Claudian period, which raises the possibility that a Sergius Paulus, with however the praenomen Quintus, was proconsul of Cyprus." The inscription is IGR iii.935. Acts 13:6-12 does not provide a praenomen for the Sergius Paullus who was interested in Paul's preaching; there is no good reason for calling him Lucius, except that's what the older scholars told us it was.Maybe the older scholars got his name wrong all along. -- llywrch (talk) 08:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I stuck a reference to that information in a footnote. I'd be happy for you to improve it. John Foxe (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, I was thinking this might require a re-write of the whole article. The author of Acts implies that Paul converted the proconsul Sergius Paulus (I say "imply" because had a Roman Senator embraced Christianity, it would have been a notorious scandal that might have destroyed his family -- who yet appear afterwards as consuls), which would be one article. Another article, perhaps, to discuss the family of the Sergii Pauli, who thrived for at least another century; it is possible that the famous Anicii of the 4th century are their distant descendants. I'm just not confident I know enough to untangle what is in this article & reweave the information I have found in the relevant secondary literature about the Sergii Pauli. -- llywrch (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I can imagine scenarios in which Paul's Sergius Paulus was converted but without subsequent scandal—as for instance, if he had died shortly thereafter. If the man had had the faintest of reputation thereafter, I'd expect some early Christian stories about him. I mean, if Longinus can be a saint then why not Sergius Paulus? Also, a strange coincidence I never noticed before is that Acts 13 begins by calling the protagonist "Saul," he's called "Paul" for the first time while in the presence of Sergius Paulus, and he remains "Paul" ever after.John Foxe (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucius or Quintus?
Talk:Bloc Québécois leadership elections

message: When do votes have to be held? 7 years seems like a long mandate. -- stewacide 04:53, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It sounds to me like the scrutinization for second preferences was only done for Duceppe preferences. Once he surpassed 50%, there was no need to check for second preferences for the other candidates. That would be why all of the second preferences seem to go to Duceppe -- the count for the other two candidates simply wasn't done. If others agree with my conclusion, I will adjust the article accordingly. Ground Zero 15:35, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This makes more sense than any other possibility.  Would anyone have confirmation that this is what happened?  CJCurrie 19:29, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Second ballot in the 1997 election

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:British Columbia Liberal Party leadership contest, 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Ulundi

message: According to the Cultural History Museum's guide at Ondini, a Thami Richard Mhlophe, Ondini was the name of original village (royal kraal) destroyed by the British on 4 July 1879 and its meaning is high or elevated position which it certainly is, looking out over the plains below, which include the now town of Ulundi situated around the former battlefield of Ulundi on the Mahlabatini flats.  According to him Ulundi in a corruption of the original name Ondini, and was first used by a trader that established a shop on the plains below and near the former battle field.  
As an aside it is noted that the isiZulu or Zulu word "omndeni" means "of the family"; and it could mean it was the village of the number one family!
Pietermaritburg (the original Natal capital) re-took over the capital status from Ulundi when political power in KwaZulu-Natal changed from the Inkata Freedom Party (IFP) to the African National Congress (ANC). 41.240.44.140 (talk) 07:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why did Ulundi lose this in 2004? Loganberry (Talk) 14:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shared capital status 

message: Predominant economic activity 102.249.5.34 (talk) 18:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography
Talk:Topcoder

message: I'm removing codejam from tournaments because google has deployed their own system for codejam.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MahasonaLK (talk • contribs) 18:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codejam 

message: Needs a criticisms section to have any appearance of objectivity.
:I guess it would be easier to add one if it wasn't for the fact it is incredibly difficult to find objective criticism about topcoder. In fact, I think that just putting a criticism section in this case would be the opposite of being objective. The most I could find was a slashdot article about crowdsourcing in which some slashdot kids complained about it. Then we have http://amplicate.com/hate/topcoder in which some guys are venting frustration after losing or complaining about technical issues during contests in which they participated, but 9 opinions out of thousands active coders seems too small...  If you wish to have an objective criticism section, a good start would be to begin by giving us a pointer to it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.103.71.220 (talk) 23:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: TopCoder does not support Python in Algorithm Matches. Python is supported in Marathon Matches, and in the Google Code Jams of the past. Will someone change that, or am I missing something?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.38.36 (talk) 12:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Python in Algorithm Matches 

message: I have cleaned up a lot of "cite bombing" (excessive overusage of redundant citations) throughout the article. For common statements 1-2 reliable sources are perfectly sufficient (ideally independent expert sources). Self-published sources can occasionally be used, but not when better sources exist or half the article depends on them (see also WP:RS and WP:SPS). Any claim of success, quality, importance, etc. must be based on an independent reliable source - occasional self-published sources are only acceptable for absolutely uncontroversial, non-promotional details. The spamming of numerous backlinks to the organization's PR publications, forums and campaign sites is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. The article needs further cleanup of remaining similar issues throughout. The usage of such sources should be reduced and/or replaced with independent reliable sources where needed. GermanJoe (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive cite bombing with low-quality and self-published sources
Talk:Progressive Conservative Party of Canada leadership elections

message: need more info on who supports whom.
Also need to install links from candidates to this pageFormeruser-83 08:10, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The entry should be remnamed "Conservative Leadership Conventions" because the name "Progressive Conservative" doesn't represent the current or original name of the party.
*I disagree. The PC Party was the legal continuation of the Conservative Party (historical). The PC Party disbanded when the new Conservative Party was formed. The new CPC is not the legal continuation of the PC Party. There should, therefore, be a new summary article called "Conservative leadership elections" that covers leadership elections held by the new CPC, and the existing "PC leadership conventions" article should not include the results of the new CPC leadership election, but have only a link to it. "PC leadership conventions" reflects the name of the party during most of the time that it held leadership convnetions. Keep in mind that before 1943, the party went through numerous name changes -- Liberal-Conservative, Unionist, National Liberal-Conservative, Conservative. Ground Zero 15:26, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of Entry 

message: That section should be removed from this article. This article is about the Conservative/Progressive Conservative Party (1867-2003) only. Therefore, I'm removing it. GoodDay 19:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The 2004 Conservative Leadership section

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:British Columbia Liberal Party leadership contest, 2011 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress