Talk:Electronic publishing

message: I offer an external link to the article on electronic publishing -- my new website, readersandwritersblog.com. It is a nonprofit site intended to give writers a place to publish their work -- nonfiction, fiction or poetry of any length, published or unpublished -- and to give readers a chance to read that work and, if they choose, to comment on it. 
Sid Leavitt 22:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor added a spam warning to the external link list. But if Wikipedia is to have an article on electronic publishing (as I think it should), then surely some links to electronic publishers make sense as exemplars and sources of further information.  This is, in fact, the most conventional use of external links in articles about industry sectors.  The list as it stands seems reasonable, if incomplete. MarkBernstein 11:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Recent pruning of the external links to Hypertext Fiction included removing links to Eastgate_Systems.  I think that's wrong. I'm an employee of Eastgate, but I'm also past program chair of the Hypertext Conference (twice), and I'm program chair of WikiSym 2008, and in this context I'd appreciate extension of assumption of good faith to this discussion.  Eastgate has been publishing hypertext fiction since 1990, and its catalog includes the majority of titles discussed in books about literary hypertext, taught in courses on hypertext fiction, and examined in conferences and monographs.  I'd prefer links to specific works of hypertext fiction in this place, but understand the desire for a concise list. Concision means trimming the list as much as possible, but not more.  (I'd prefer to discuss this by email bernstein@eastgate.com if discussion is necessary)  18:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Eastgate afd was a silly stunt by one admin who had a beef with a writer who we happened to publish. It wasn't close.  Stuff like this is a blight on wikipedia. But, in any case, the wikipedia pages ARE wikipedia pages, and so the spam tag cannot be appropriate.  MarkBernstein (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: Can some sharp eyes tell if the page number for the term of Aspartame is a bold type or not in the following...???
* http://www.pharmacopoeia.co.uk/pdf/2009_index.pdf
--222.64.211.100 (talk) 07:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reason for standardization of the topic.... 

message: I propose adding online video media (youtube and the like) to the list of new media examples Kcalmond (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a "publication" 

message: I would suggest adding this information regarding Hybridity of publishing for into the main Electronic Publishing entry. This information comes from a peer reviewed source.
According to a study by Brown et. al. there are three different forms of “hybrid publication” (publication that is produced simultaneously in print and digital form):
An example of hybrid form publication would be an electronic version of a book containing elements that remind us of a parallel printed version. This is not solely through page facsimiles but through the use of tools provided by the print version. For instance, a table of contents where instead of providing page numbers, it would provide hyperlinks directing the reader to specific page locations within the electronic version of the book. 
Hectorlopez17 (talk) 23:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Hectorlopez17. Unfortunately, I cannot add those sentences since some were copied word-for-word from the journal article. The journal article is licensed CC-BY-NC-ND 2.5, which is incompatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA 3.0 license – the journal does not permit commercial reuse but Wikipedia does. You'll have to paraphrase that sentence if it is to be incorporated into the article. Best, Altamel (talk) 04:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hybridity of publishing forms

message: There is a discussion at Talk:Typography#"Digital typography" that may interest editors. The present redirect target of Digital typography is being debated. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital typography