Talk:Harman International

message: Can someone please update the logo?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.180.229 (talk) 02:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Harman International Industries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071228053230/http://www.ce.org:80/Events/Awards/489.htm to http://www.ce.org/Events/Awards/489.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090331101939/http://www.twice.com:80/article/CA6566016.html to http://www.twice.com/article/CA6566016.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Harman International Industries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ce.org/Events/Awards/489.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.twice.com/article/CA6566016.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160611014747/http://investor.harman.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=969391 to http://investor.harman.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=969391
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150909205907/http://investor.harman.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-15-283170&CIK=800459 to http://investor.harman.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-15-283170&CIK=800459
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Might be nice to introduce a timeline on this page, similar to this one on the JBL page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBL then we could mention smaller acquisitions, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogerdpack (talk • contribs) 17:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: Brands listed are supposed to be Harman brands, right? In that case Bang & Olufsen is placed on the list by a mistake Glubskeegern (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bang & Olufsen - a Harman brand? (No!) 

message: I don't know where to place this, so I guess this is the best place to discuss this. I've noticed that on articles about subsidiaries of this company, including Revel Audio, Soundcraft, and Crown International, a few IPs are removing mention that Harman is a subsidiary of Samsung, under the pretense that this is too much information. I can't find any policy on articles about subsidiaries of subsidiaries, so I'm assuming this is a matter of consensus, and since I'd rather not edit war, I'm taking it here. I support keeping this information. It's only one sentence, and I don't see any noticeable downside to including this information. What say you? JellyMan9001 (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that knowing that Harman is a subsidiary of Samsung is valuable knowledge. I do not think including that detail takes away from the clarity of the articles that were edited. Samsung is a well known brand and a much larger company, while Harman is much more niche in comparison. CameronNemo (talk) 23:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I don't where the harm is in it being mentioned. It's an undisputed fact, and it doesn't delegitimize Harman as a company. I don't think there's any policy for naming subsidiaries of subsidiaries, but it does happen. For example, YouTube TV list Youtube as a subsidiary of Google, and lists Google as a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. It's only a single sentence, and I don't think it will confuse anybody researching the article. I'd argue the contrary in fact. That seems like information somebody reaserching these companies might want to know. JellyMan9001 (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

text: I agree that it's useful information. Including it certainly doesn't harm the articles, and probably helps them incrementally.  It should stay in.BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 10:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

text: There doesn't seem to be a consensus to remove mention of the Samsung connection from these articles. Proposed or reverted changes along these lines should be discussed here. ~Kvng (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you may have misunderstood me. I have argued for keeping the mention of Samsung in these articles, as has every other logged in user in this section. So I think there is consensus in the other direction, to keep the mention. Please also see my note below about this IP hopping edit warrior. CameronNemo (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the topic of articles about subsidiaries of Harman 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Infinity (audio). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 25#Infinity (audio) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  64.229.90.53 (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Infinity (audio)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]