lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Delos Bennett Sackett

message: Two photos of Delos Bennett Sackett are available for downloading from the Library of Congress web site. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/cwarquery.html and search for "Sacket" (remember—only one "T") Winship 12:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: More info is in *this biography of Delos Bennett Sackett to expand the article. Tyrenius 01:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More info
Talk:La Shawn Ford

message: As an elected state politician, this person is automatically notable. I am not sure whether there should be a space between La and Shawn. --Eastmain 02:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: LaShawn Ford → La Shawn K. Ford — this is the correct spelling of his name, with the space between La and Shawn and including the middle initial K. Please see his own website lashawnford.com for confirmation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illinois8th5104 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . No objections after 16 days. Most refs show proposed spelling. Station1 (talk) 06:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The picture that is up is NOT La Shawn Ford.  It is actually State Representative Marcus C. Evans, Jr. This is a serious issue now since Representative Ford has recently been indicted.  Someone needs to address this immediately.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.165.222.34 (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of La Shawn Ford 
Talk:Kips Bay, Manhattan

message: Please see the talk page of Landing at Kip's Bay for a brief explanation/discussion of the changes I made today - namely, the American force figure (900 to 500) and location (34th to 33rd St). Comments, questions and general interest is greatly appreciated. Tan  |  39 18:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes made

message: I've been looking at NYC neighborhoods today on wikipedia, and noticed that neighborhoods in queens, brooklyn, and bronx are generally titled Neighborhood_Name,_Borough; yet this is titled just by the neighborhood name. Is there a reason for this? I'm moving on to other cities after today, so don't expect changes or further input from me, but whoever's taking care of this page should definitely consider changing it to the other standard, if it's found to be expedient. (I.e., renaming to Kips_Bay,_Manhattan) — Eric Herboso 07:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Upper East Side and a number of other neighborhoods are unambiguous as this one is, so they don't need a specification.  Jim.henderson (talk) 03:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: question on title
Talk:Battle of Vučji Do

message: I dont understand. Judging by the damage inflicting on the flag, it appears that the Ottoman soldiers did not concern themselves with killing their enemy but took potshots at the flag only. And this is the age of muzzle-loaders, or at best paper cartridges, which means that you can not shoot that fast. I doubt that this was the case. No wonder than that they suffered so many casualties but that number (4000) seems incredibly high. What sources mention this? Where is the evidence? I, for one, would call the veracity of this article into question. It reminds me of John Keegan's "Bullfrog Effect" in the introduction of his famed "The Face of Battle." For those not familiar with this the Bullfrog Effect is essentially the reconstruction of the events solely or largely on the evidence of those whose reputations may gain or lose by the account they give such as wounded pride, self-esteem inflating whatever the author feels is at stake: manhood, bravery, vanity. Needless to say the Balkans, especially the highlands in the Balkans and specifically the Montenegrins and Serbs have much of this. Give me the evidence and I will be a beliver  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyhall (talk • contribs) 20:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realibility of this article ??
Talk:Kingdom of Montenegro

message: why is NOW on this page present flag of Montenegro from S.R. Yugoslavian period.
Few months ago was regular flag of kingdom of Montenegro
Stefke 03:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  flag, flag, flag 

message: when you click arrow '->' it links to kingdom of Serbia article??? Why not kingdom of Yugoslavia article?  (Stefke 03:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link 

message: I posted this information that has a reliable source, but it has been repeatedly removed. 
A client state can be a legally independent state that is recognized as being under strong political influence of another state.
I used a reliable source published by the reputable Oxford University.
Here is what the source says: "Thus, by the beginning of the 19th century, Montenegro had assumed the status of a virtual Russian protectorate, with its port of Kotor serving as a base of support for the Russian Black Sea Fleet during its forays into the Mediterranean Sea. Serbia itself became a Russian client state by virtue of the two countries' anti-Turkish interests, but without in the end the political and territorial gains expected from the Russian alliance."--70.26.113.85 (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montenegro and Serbia were client states of Russia 

message: Do someone happen to have a map showing the administrative division of the Kingdom of Montenegro in 1914? DarkoRatic (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Administrative Division of the Kingdom of Montenegro in 1914
Talk:Powell, Ohio

message: Kyle Todd is not a football player. Its vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NecroAnubie (talk • contribs) 19:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's my belief that notable residents should be defined as follows: Current residents of Powell, Ohio who are considered notable by Wikipedia's notability standards.
I haven't checked all of the current notable residents but they all seem to be notable at this time (I'll be checking after this post).
If you would like to add someone whose notability you're unsure of or if you're unsure of the notability of someone currently on the list, please discuss it here. Thanks. OlYellerTalktome 17:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Powell,_Ohio#Notable_residents|Notable residents]] 
Talk:Banknotes of the Lithuanian litas

message: I deleted the line: "In later years, the banknote received unexpected media attention when the gay community started to send this banknote as a souvenir to foreign friends." There's no source, there's no explanation of why this would happen and I can't find anything about this elsewhere on the internet. It seems trivial in the extreme. Vauxhall1964 (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Gay souvenir'
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Indonesia

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:20, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Above and Beyond (1952 film)

message: Hi all, I'm wondering if there's a source for the part where it says the sanitary engineers humorous moment was true? The cited source doesn't appear to actually mention anything about that. Thanks! 160.79.60.162 (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for "Sanitary Engineers" veracity?
Talk:Collie Buddz

message: This article is horribly POV, terribly written and desperately needs to be wikified. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Article!

message: fuckin hating!  relax guy99.154.118.202 (talk) 05:45, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: STOP
Talk:Ophthalmology in the medieval Islamic world

message: The use of the term medieval in reference to Islam is rather odd, it usually being reserved for discussion of European history. This page could benefit from more precise dating.
PaulH
192.174.2.253 03:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ibn al-Haytham was not an ophthalmologist, his anatomical "contributions" were likely taken from Galen. He may have suggested that the retina was involved in image formation and that vision occurred in the brain, not the eye, but this hardly counts as "ophthalmology". He also thought that the receptive part of the eye was the lens, rather than (as we now know) the retina. Famousdog (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the source for this is from a complementary medicine journal, for Pete's sake! Famousdog (talk) 12:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ibn al-Haytham 

message: Vast tracts of this are uncited. The "references" section is very poor William M. Connolley (talk) 22:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuff 
Talk:Angels One Five

message: Pink Floyd referred to Angels One Five in the track The Gunner's Dream from their anti-war album, The Final Cut (1983).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Czubad (talk • contribs) 19:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's "The Hero's Return" rather than "The Gunner's Dream." 71.181.43.16 (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular references
Talk:Pittsburgh Pipers

message: The former owners of the Spirits of St. Louis still receive a check from the NBA to this day. Who owns the rights to the name, etc. for the former Pipers? DarkAudit (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rights holders? 

message: Since both teams are the exact same entity, it might be frugal to merge the two articles together.
DaDoc540 (talk) 02:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Pittsburgh Condors?
Talk:40th century BC

message: This is a joke, right? No, its fact.
Article repaired: it presented elements of Jewish mythology as if they were historical
Sebasbronzini 08:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it! Create a proper article for the 50th century BC, rather than the current redirect. With a bit of luck someone who thinks he knows better won't delete it or merge it. Then again, maybe an Admin will pull rank. After all, they are the bosses here. 86.31.72.17 11:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Time began then? LOL, that's a good joke. Tomlee2060 (talk) 07:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless time and/or matter is co-eternal with God as some modern translations would have it, rendering "bereshit bara elohim" as "When God began to create" instead of the proper "In the beginning, God created". St John Chrysostom Δόξατω Θεώ 05:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I removed the mentioning of the Tower of Babel from the Myths and Beliefs section, because, even a literal chronological dating of the Tower of Babel from Genesis 1:1–9 places this in the 23rd century BC— 2242 BC according to the infamous Ussher chronology.  I do not believe such rubbish, but even the myth itself did not take place in the 40th century BC.  Unless someone can provide some form of mythological sources for this event taking place between the years 3999–3900 BC, then it cannot be mentioned in this article.  —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė ♫♪
: that is such a crock... it all depends on what you believe, there is no proof one way or the other, and the fact that in the 20th century they started to rebuild the tower should at least say something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.255.202.110 (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  We have a verifiability criterion.  Even by the most charitable assessment, a folk legend does not pass the standard.  --TS 20:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of the Tower of Babel 

message: I've moved the entry for 4004 to the "Myths and beliefs" section.  To represent it as a chronological event is misleading. --TS 06:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 4004
Talk:Secondary suite

message: Hi!
I am a Rice Architecture student who would love to create a new article on Accessory Dwelling Units, specifically in the United States. For this article, I would provide a short description of ADUs, as well as some background history on housing in the United States and the use of these dwelling units. Then, I would provide information on their benefits and challenges, complemented by examples of projects that have already been executed in some American states/cities. I believe this article would be a great addition to the Wikipedia Section on housing, sustainability, and urbanism, as well as a useful complementary article to this main secondary suite article. I invite you to check my user page for more information on this possible future article. 
Ennis Architect (talk) 00:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me! I'd say go ahead and create the article, but if it is not accepted, than put the content in here and improve this article; it can always be broken out later. ---Avatar317(talk) 22:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article: Accessory Dwelling Units in the United States 

message: I have created a quick illustration of different secondary suite types. Please let me know your thoughts on if it would be helpful for the page. I based it off some similar designs from APA and AARP. Joiedevivre123321 (talk) 03:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples Image 

message: I would like to propose some organization edits. I believe adding "background" and "benefits" sections would be helpful. The background section could include history of secondary suites, terminology, and legal considerations. This may help consolidate some of the information that is repeated or confusing. A benefits section would add context to why countries, states, or regions are permitting secondary suites. This reorganization would also help us to update some outdated information. Joiedevivre123321 (talk) 01:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sound good to me. Thanks for your other edits also on Missing Middle Housing. ---Avatar317(talk) 22:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Organization
Talk:Sarangpur, Madhya Pradesh

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Dragon's Revenge

message: Instead of all these screenshots I'd use just 1 and a cover picture (there's no cover now). --212.91.5.20 (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations 

message: --Asperchu (talk) 18:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover's still needeed
Talk:The Farnsworth Invention

message: AFAIK this movie still has not been made, so should there be an article? --killing sparrows 03:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The production of the movie came to a halt, and the screenplay was turned into a play, which currently is showing at La Jolla Playhouse.-BillDeanCarter 05:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Even though the vast majority of the reviews surrounding this play (save the NYT) have been overwhelmingly positive, there is but one quotation that cites a favorable review. This needs to be fixed. 67.81.114.10 (talk) 03:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfair representation of reviews 

message: this whole play is a grossly misleading alteration of historical events. Read the entry. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  historical accuracy 

message: The article does mention that the play is historically inaccurate and "is an intentional alteration of the story." It then goes on to detail the differences between the play's plot and the event upon which it was based. The problem is, nowhere does the article actually explain what the play is about! I think this is more than a small issue. Skiasaurus (skē’ ə sôr’ əs) 14:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?
Talk:Bronze-winged Pionus

message: A bronze wing pionus has very similar characteristics as the white-crowned, both physically, and, mannerisms, my wife and I have had a Bronze-winged Pionus for 9 years. Our Bronze-Winged is named "Bump" which is a very fitting name for her, as in "Bump On A Log", as she does not make a lot of noise, nor does she do many tricks, she definitely has a mind of her own. 
Bump is a very lovable pet. She enjoys being out of the cage with us and playing before nite-nite. She loves for my wife to pet her head, she will walk over to my wife and plop her head down to let her know it's time to pet her head. She loves to play with knotted toys, she will work for hours and hours to untie a knot. A peanut is like a cigar to her, she loses more of the peanut than she actually eats, she will use the shell as if it were a spoon holding with her foot taking bites of the nuts inside. These birds do love to eat, we had her wings clipped for the first two years we owned her and she got very heavy, we decided to not clip her wings and allowed her to fly between 2 or 3 rooms of the house and she did lose weight, they need exercise.
Jeffrey A. Lakes 03:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fringe Club

message: What is the relevance of English tutor leaflet? The Fringe Club might have nothing to do with it.Wai Hong 11:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 comments on questionable content
Talk:Greg Mail

message: This is gushing praise for a batsman who has been an average performer at first class level. Follow the link to the Cricinfo blurb and read for yourself.
His stats (61 matches, avge 32) don't match the glowing description, which sounds like it was written by his manager.
Now that I've taken out the POV stuff, is there any reason for an article on Mail to exist? It's not like he's been considered for Australian selection or anything, and he hasn't been in the spotlight for anything else. Damanmundine1 11:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Englezovac

message: The article Savinac should be merged into Englezovac, as those are two names for the sam neighborhood. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: It is not correct to say that Mackenzie was a Nazarene - he merely sympathised with their cause (they were persecuted in Serbia), visited them in prison, supported them financially etc. Quoting from the foreword to David Braun, 1898, Komentari k Jevanđeljima, Novi Sad, Štamparija Đorđa Ivkovića, written by its translator, minister of finance and ambassador to the UK, and Mackenzie's personal friend, Čedomilj Mijatović:
"But if I may I would say this much:
that he was not a Nazarene, as he was suspected of being by certain people; nor did he belong to any English sect or church; nor did he ever, in any way, work in Serbia and among the Serbs in the interests of propaganda of any sort."
Mackenzie was also more closely tied to the Plymouth Brethren. I do not have time to dig out these sources, but just leaving this here. 
188.2.20.50 (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Some corrections re: Francis Mackenzie
Talk:Rickenbacker 360/12

message: I deleted an erroneous claim (well, maybe that's too harsh) that the guitar featured a rectangular tailpiece for a number of years. This is simply not true; since its first production in 1963 (as prototypes), very few instruments were produced with the rect. tailpiece, which was changed at the same time as other models' tailpieces.
:Rickenbacker introduced the "R" tailpiece in 1963, but didn't start putting them on 12-strings until 1965.  JSC ltd 15:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy Issues 

message: I have yet to see Peter Buck play a twelve string Ric 360, other than a photo of him with a Roger McGuinn model (Not live). There is no account of him ever using one in the studio, ever. I will remove him name from the list promptly. --BuddyOfHolly (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Buck 

message: rickenbacker's 12-string guitars & their 8-string basses are known for having the courses reversed compared with other double-course instruments. however, the first prototype of the 360/12 was strung "normally", i.e. with the octave string outside (above) the normal string for the E, A & D strings. the top three strings are simply doubled up with the same gauge.
I'm looking for a decent citation of this... will this do?
http://www.guitarworld.com/beatles-secret-weapon-george-harrison-s-1963-rickenbacker-36012
duncanrmi (talk) 18:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  courses 

message: I have commented out most of the "notable players" as the list was largely a mixture of  a few notable players of 360/12s mixed with  Rickenbacker 6 string players (Peter Buck, Johnny Marr, Paul Weller) who may have used a 12 string now and then often by a different brand (e.g. Buck often used a Fender XII), players who were associated with 12 strings but not the Rick 360 (Hicks of the Hollies played a Vox, as did Brian Jones, I'm sure Rick 12s passed through their hands briefly at some stage) and in some cases pretty obscure players who REALLY stretch the definition of "notable".
I sourced McGuinn, Harrison, Petty and Campbell, and Townshend as they seemed self evident. I found an interview where Weller says he owns a couple of 12 string ricks (doesn't say which models, I remember he preferred 330s in his Jam days) but I don't know if there are any notable instances of him playing them on record so I didn't include him yet. Verlaine76 (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Players
Talk:Prigrevica

message: The village was founded about 600 years ago. So you just can not start the history in 1947.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.173.239.228 (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

message: Defter (from Persian دفتر: daftar meaning book, registry, and in modern time office or bureau) was a cadastral tax census carried out by the Ottoman Empire. The defters collected information about villages, dwellings, household heads (adult males and widows), and ethnicities.--Speidelj (talk) 00:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Early sources about Prigrevica
Talk:Camp Casablanca

message: In Summer 2001 there were not only Austrian and Swiss troops in this camp, but service personnel from Germany, Slovakia and Bulgaria as well, albeit in significantly lower numbers --2A02:1205:5016:FAA0:58AF:9965:4F8E:6ED3 (talk) 13:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulgarian and Slovak forces too!
Template talk:Serbia-geo-stub

message: Please replace the picture: Flag of Serbia.svg, with the picture: Flag map of Serbia (with Kosovo).svg.
85.64.251.156 (talk) 15:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: Why, what purpose will the change serve? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 25 November 2012
Talk:Manasija

message: Manasija is NOT located in AP Vojvodina! Note reading "This article about a location in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it." should be deleted
--msmandrino (talk) 01:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tadija (talk) 20:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Kovilj

message: Removed reference to Ras as it has nothing to do with Kovilj, Novi Sad, and Vojvodina. It is not near as it weirdly stated in the article, but about 200 km away (check Wiki link and the following reference).–Jozefsu (talk) 15:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ras?
Talk:Magistrates' Court of the Australian Capital Territory

message: Section 4 of the Magistrates Court Act 1930 (ACT) states:
(1) The Magistrates Court is continued in existence.
Correct name of court therefore appears to be Magistrates Court rather than Magistrate's Court. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Assize (talk • contribs) 05:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Court