Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters/Archive 1

message: the title of this article makes it sound like a website. I propose we redirect this page to List of characters from SpongeBob SquarePants or something of the sort. --Philo 06:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: *Who is Octozilla? Any references? -AMK152 23:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Octozilla?

message: I looked through this entire article, but couldn't find anything about Don the Whale. Is he missing or am I crazy?
*I don't see him either.  But I do remember him having a description on this article, but i dont remember it being removed... -AMK152 02:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don? 

message: I was browsing Davy Jones a couple of days ago, and I was pleased to see an image of him as depicted in Sponge Bob. However, some Berk has now messed up the whole series of Davy Jones articles, and now I can't find that image, or any mention of DJ on this page... Can anyone help me out? I wanna find that image and put it back on the Davy Jones' Locker page. Hail the Sponge Bob Square Pants Project!!! --Dan|(talk) 10:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Davy Jones]] Character? 

message: Does anyone else agree that we don't need to list every single creature mentioned in the show?  Seems like listing people who've only been mentioned on the show is a waste of time.Konczewski 16:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stan the Manta is not a character as far as I know; I am not sure of there was this character on a videogame. -AMK152 22:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Desperate need for cleanup

message: This character had a page here which was redirected to this page but there is nothing about them. Arniep 20:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Man Ray

message: in the talk for SpongeBob SquarePants I have already stated that The Purple Doctorfish is not Dr. Gill Gilliam even though they have the same voice. Mrsanitazier 22:45,  3 November 2006 2006 (UTC)
:The only difference is the color. Perch Perkins has had color change, so has Fred, Tom, and even Mr. Krabs, Squidward, SpongeBob, and Patrick in some episodes. Notice how Perch Perkins and Gill Gilliam are normally purple, but changed to orange in Once Bitten. -AMK152 02:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Charchter 

message: I thing he should get an article... Kitia 23:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gill Gilliam

message: After closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squilliam Fancyson, the following content needs to be merged into this article, but I've no idea where it would go. Here it is for someone who actually watches the programme to do:
*Squilliam Fancyson is Squidward Tentacles's high school arch rival. Squilliam is an octopus that attended Squidward's band class, and always puts him down. He is a very wealthy, snooty, unibrow-endowed rival of Squidward who looks down at Squidward for being just a lowly cashier in a greasy spoon. He owns a private yacht, a private lake, a private heliport, a private island, and a balloon/casino. He owns beautiful clothes, velvet shirts with a leather collar, and gold-silver alloy buttons for his leather cloak. 
Squilliam's first appearance was in Band Geeks, where he challenged Squidward to play his band at the Bubble Bowl, commenting that he couldn't make it. Also, he comments that he is living Squidward's dream. However, Squilliam lied, and came anyway because he wanted to watch Squidward blow it. However, at the end of "Band Geeks", Squilliam, painfully aware of how good Squidward's band's performance is, has a heart attack and is rushed to the hospital, therefore, Squidward gets him back. Squidward is painfully jealous and schemes constantly to show Squilliam he isn't a loser. He later returns in "Squilliam Returns" and thinks that Squidward is the owner of a five-star restaurant. Once again, Squidward fails to impress him when chaos erupts.
 Robdurbar 09:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content To Be Merged

message: Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry the Lobster (SpongeBob SquarePants), it is recommended that Larry the Lobster (SpongeBob SquarePants) be merged into this article. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe
He shouldn't be merged. Larry has appeared in LOTS of episodes and more than once has played a key part. He deserves his own page. Bowsy 19:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion per AfD  

message: *I'm sure Gill Gilliam and "the purple doctor" are different characters. -- 87.181.84.14 17:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Different colors don't mean anything. Perch Perkins, Tom, and Farmer Jenkins have all changed colors before. ->AMK152(Talk • Contributions • Send message)  12:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctors 

message: Why? Plenty of them deserve articles. At least keep Pearl and Mrs. Puff. Kitia 17:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Merging the charachters! 

message: Oh God, this article is WAAAAY too big, so many characters that used to have a page are now in the major section and all bar squilliam had decent articles that shouldn't have been deleted. W need to re-create these pages as this page is turning into listcruft. I suggest the major characters are re given their pages. Henchman 2000 11:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of this article 

message: There's no Dirty Bubble! Charles Nelson Reilly recently died. He was the voice of Dirty Bubble. --66.218.12.41 01:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dirty Bubble?

message: :Image:MrsandMrsStar.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MrsandMrsStar.JPG

message: They look exactly the same. Should we delete one?
:There is some distinction between the two. Look at the hair. Evelyn just has hair on the back of her head. Anette has hair on top of her head. It's actual human hair. Also look at the eyes. Anette has eyelids, but Evelyn doesn't. Plus, her eyes are bigger. —Gm1121983 21:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anette and Evelyn 

message: :Image:TinaSpongeBob.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TinaSpongeBob.JPG

message: :Image:TimmySpongeBob.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TimmySpongeBob.JPG

message: :Image:TinaSpongeBob.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TinaSpongeBob.JPG

message: :Image:AnnetteSpongeBob.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 13:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AnnetteSpongeBob.JPG

message: :Image:EvelynSpongeBob.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:EvelynSpongeBob.JPG

message: Whoever keeps deleting it, STOP IT ALREADY!  I'm fed up with having to revert this blatant vandalism! Go to my user page if you want to see the lost information on the holiday of Pule.  User:Feats-O-Strength 15:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  STOP DELETING PATRICK AND GARY'S FAMILY! 

message: What do you guys think of pushing Pearl Krabs, Mermaid Man, Barnacle Boy, The Flying Dutchman, King Neptune, and Princess Mindy down as "Major" characters?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack M. Crazyfish (talk • contribs) 22:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO, Mindy, Neptune and the Dutchman certainly ought to go down a notch; Pearl, perhaps also, but its still debateable whether Mermaid Man and Barnacle Boy should be moved down.  -Grammaticus Repairo 15:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dividing line between Main and Major

message: right|thumb|200px|They are our friendsWe need to seriously cut down on this fancruft. We do not need a section on every single character that ever appeared. I hope to work with the project members and denizens of this page, not against. 
*I suggest we make one List of Characters article. These would have main characters, and semi-main characters. People who never play a significant role, or are only seen once, do not need to be mentioned here at all. This would be the only entry for characters. Spongebob can have his own article, but none of the others. If that can't happen, we could have one on Squidward, Sandy, Patrick and Mr. Krabs, but thats it.
*This would delete 1.3 and below. There is simply no need for such detail on an encyclopedia. At a cursory look at the main article, there are three fanwikis that this is much more appropriate on. The material can be put there. We do not need it here.
I expect opposition, of course. But I encourage you all to read up on what Wikipedia is really about, what should be included, and what shouldn't. I intend to go through the whole Spongebob sereies of articles. i (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now been five days without comments. Intend to do as I suggested, since silence equals consensus. I'll notify the WikiProject page of this as well, and intend to do as I suggested there, as well. i (talk) 23:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for some Scissors 

message: I restored the character descriptions which I had recently revised in the 'Main' section after an anon user had reverted them to the original 'dumbed down' descriptions.  I'm not being overly protective of my work--I just believe the original descriptions were unquestionably inferior (and rife with errors).  Constructive users, please make whatever changes you deem appropriate. -Grammaticus Repairo 00:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoration of recently revised 'main' character descriptions 

message: :I don't know where you are getting your information from, but if you believe that I am making some sort of an unauthorized reprint of an official character listing, you are in error.  When I rewrote the 'Main' characters section, it was based purely on my own personal knowledge of the characters in the series along with a small amount of retained information already on the wiki page.  In other words, this set of information was compiled and edited together by me and was not plagiarized in any way from any other source.  It is NOT copyrighted because I wrote it myself!  If you are going to accuse me of a copyright violation, I would appreciate it if you would provide, as evidence, a link to the source material you claim I am duplicating.  -Grammaticus Repairo 14:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can 218.101.70.152 reveal who owns the copyright and where it is published? I did a few searches in google with some text and found nothing except content which is retrieved from Wikipedia. There's nothing to indicate copyright infringement here so far. ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 18:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Changing the Main Character Section 

message: :Image:Fishhead.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fishhead.JPG

message: I am still waiting for the anonymous user who keeps reverting my edits (and edit-protecting the page) to discuss the matter here on the talk page.  My position on this remains the same--because wikipedia articles are for EVERYONE to improve, and because the material I have added to the page IS an improvement (not vandalism) and is NOT copyrighted text (I know this because I composed it myself), I will continue to restore my changes to the article.  If this anonymous user has problems with this, I would encourage him/her to come and discuss the matter with me on this page.  I would also appreciate hearing the opinions of any other user/contributor with an interest in this article.  -Grammaticus Repairo 15:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Continued reverts of Main character section