lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Batman: The Animated Series/Animated Series Batman Talk

message: Tere have been great edits, but remember we ar talking about Bruce Wayne, not about Terry, the Arkhams or the League.--T-man, the wise 21:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MORE FOCUS ON BRUCE WAYNE 

message: :If your sock puppet allegation is against me, by all means, please request a check.  I'm posting from the same IP address I have 99% of the time in the past (I did edit from school a couple of times.)  Just because I haven't editted in a while does not mean that I'm suddenly (or ever was) a sock.--Gillespee 00:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sockpuppet

message: I've moved this page into the Wikipedia namespace, as projects don't belong in the article namespace. Update your bookmarks accordingly. Zetawoof(ζ) 21:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What the hell did I do?! Seriously, I don't know!--T-man, the wise 22:02, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nothing. Explanation is on my talk page. Zetawoof(ζ) 22:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved project 

message: T-Man -- are you familiar at all with Wikia?  It is another Wiki-Media related project with emphasis on fan communities.  Perhaps you could familiarize yourself with the DCAU and Batman communities there, and move this article entirely off Wikipedia, and into Wikia?  ~CS 15:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Compromise

message: A good point was made, I don't actually mind if this and all articles per episodes are moved to wikia. However meanwhile the amount of info should be balanced and coherent between DCU characters that appeared on the DCAU articles. Ther merge can happen, just not now, most DCAU have reached a good level of quality, moving this incomplete info over there will lower their quality for sure. I encourage editing the article to improve it and I'm not pro-merging, but if I were, I'd insist twice as much. The stuff you will be moving to the BTAS ot TNBA pages should be high quality.--T-man, the wise 07:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New section made since my points above were not addresed at all
Talk:Bremer River (Queensland)

message: The change from Roadvale to Rosevale is correct. Please note however that Roadvale is not in the Logan catchment. It is near the headwaters of Purga Creek, which flows into Warrill Creek near Amberley and thence into the Bremer River just west of Ipswich.
Oops, neglected to sign. Downsize43 (talk) 10:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roadvale, Queensland 
Talk:Darling Downs

message: Where did the Darling Downs get its name from? Maybe someone who knows could add it to the introduction. Bongomanrae 15:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Shiftchange 15:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:South East Cape

message: ----
I've added a photo as per the request.  When adding photos, at what point is it acceptable/appropriate to remove the reqphoto tag? KeresH 04:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the tag is on an article with no photos, you would normally remove it as soon as you have added a single photo. Otherwise, whenever you think it appropriate to do so. Hesperian 13:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Operation Zitronella

message: The Norwegian version of this article puts the total number of German deaths at 5 men, but the English version says 45. Which is correct? 
Thanks, Lothar_von_Richthofen (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  German Losses 

message: If the Norwegian garrison remained on the island, the Germans left within 24 hours, and American and Norwegian forces easily revisited the island, why is this a German victory? The attacking Germans failed to dislodge the Norwegian garrison, and quickly left. Sounds more like a Norwegian victory. MayerG (talk) 06:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point; as  a "victory" it was pretty qualified, but that is explained in more detail in the Aftermath section. As a one line comment in the infobox, though, it is probably adequate, especially as it is backed by a source (and a Norwegian one at that). Do you have a source that says different? Xyl 54 (talk) 13:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't have a source; the problem is that the article itself seems to contradict the infobox. Both the body of the article and the infobox seem to rely primarily on Torkildsen (in Norwegian, which I can't read) as their source, yet the narrative in the main article sounds like a Norwegian victory, while the infobox says German victory. Is Torkildsen actually saying both things at once? (As I said, I can't tell, not knowing Norwegian.) MayerG (talk) 05:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  German victory? 

message: Two battleships and nine destroyers fought against coastal artillery, with three destroyers receiving a total of 50 hits (according to the German Wikipedia), suffering considerable damage and fatalties. A batallion had to be landed with support of naval gunfire and only then forced the Norwegians to withdraw. So, "One destroyer could easily have done the job" seems to be utter nonsense. --KnightMove (talk) 08:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation appears to be nonsense 

message: Sources give conflicting numbers Keith-264 (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties, POW 

message: Are you sure Zitronella really means "Lemon Flavour"? AFAIK it is a lemon-scented grasslike plant, mostly used as a mosquito repellant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.13.17.62 (talk) 03:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I got it off an online translator so I can't be sure. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Citronella (I'm italian) has nothing to do with lemon. It's a herb. Scientific name: Cymbopogon. No idea why the Nazis called the operation this way. Ciao. Simoneschiaffino https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Simoneschiaffino. Simoneschiaffino (talk) 23:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemon Flavour? 

message: Why the Nazis called this operation "Citronella or Sicily"?? Our beloved island lies some 9.000 km... Ciao. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Simoneschiaffino Simoneschiaffino (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mille grazie ;O) Keith-264 (talk) 23:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sicily??
Talk:Fort Lytton National Park

message: User:MightDo, could please provide some overview of and rationale for the fairly massive changes you have made to this article? While there may be good reasons for what you have done, we are discussing an article with over 10 years of history contributed to by many other users, and I think some prior discussion of such massive changes are required. I note that Fort Lytton (which previously redirected here) has also been created, but it too appears to be a new article and does not comprise material that was formerly in this article. Thanks Kerry (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  massive changes without discussion?
Talk:Deadly Reunion

message: Why is this article at Deadly Reunion (Doctor Who) instead of Deadly Reunion?  As you can see by the redlink, there's no other article there.  There is apparently an episode of the X-Men animated series called Deadly Reunions, but I don't think that quite justifies the disambiguation.  Thoughts? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 16:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Tim! 17:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Leslie Dale Martin

message: Elimination: "Martin was the most recent person executed in the state of Louisiana."
Most recent execution: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-us-louisiana-execution,0,6360936.story
194.25.101.166 (talk) 08:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that was the article I used when I wrote the article. Anyway, it is on the http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/death/US/martin776.htm site for people to view. Nolamgm 16:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :This article has several problems. The subject raped and murdered Christina Burgin, was arrested, tried and convicted, then was executed. The article does not cite any references but uses State v. Martin, 645 So. 2d 190 - La: Supreme Court 1994 that apparently was copy-pasted at least in large part.
:A general reference states he was the:
*27th murderer executed in U.S. in 2002.
*776th murderer executed in U.S. since 1976.
*1st murderer executed in Louisiana in 2002.
*27th murderer executed in Louisiana since 1976. 
:Not only are there several issues with the article there is a clear lack of notability with the subject. ---  Otr500 (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Portal talk:Taiwan

message: 這個鬼地方到底有多久沒更新過了。。。台灣英文人才荒阿  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.231.166.137 (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  冷清 

message: The portal has been expanded with the addition of a new Good article section. The article selections listed below were added. Additional expansion, updating and cleanup was also performed. If anyone is interested, please feel free to discuss these changes here. North America1000 14:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal expanded
Talk:Sault Ste. Marie

message: :written without the hyphen
Given that no form given in the article contains a hyphen in the first place, what is the point of the above? Loganberry (Talk) 07:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly needs to be explained better than it is, but in French, geographic names based on saints' names would normally be hyphenated — see, for example, Saint-Augustin-de-Desmaures, Saint-Constant, Saint-Leonard. Bearcat 17:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In French-Canada, the Sault would be referred to as Sault-Ste.-Marie or Sault-Sainte-Marie, but this has no official status and is not used by the City.  FUNgus guy 18:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The whole point of the statement in question is to demonstrate this very point. Bearcat 23:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Just a quick reminder to all editors: normally Wikipedia articles should link directly to the intended topic (i.e. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario or Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan) rather than to the disambiguation page. In this particular case, for some articles — especially ones relating to pre-1800s history and/or the Great Lakes shipping channel — it can be quite ambiguous which SSM is the real destination topic, or even sometimes irrelevant to distinguish one from the other. In those cases it's fine to link directly here. But if your intention is to refer specifically to one city or the other, you must link directly to the actual destination article and not here. Bearcat 02:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation reminder
Talk:Royal Australian Artillery

message: :File:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg is non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at :File:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 12:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably should look again - clearly has a FUR for all three of the articles you tagged it for. Can't claim to know if its a valid one but its been there since 2006. Anotherclown (talk) 10:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:NFCC#10c. Such a group rationale is unacceptable. A separate rationale is required for each use. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 10:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  So fix it yourself - its not hard to actually make a contribution rather than just being lazy and tagging something. Anotherclown (talk) 10:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the policy instead of accusing me of being lazy. WP:NFCCE is clear in that it is the duty of the people who want to use the non-free content to provide a valid rationale for that use. If I were lazy I wouldn't care to perform this tagging in the first place. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 10:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rubbish - I never uploaded the image, I just stumbled across your pathetic tag job which lacks the detail req'd for someone to deal with. You clearly understand policy so why not just fix the problem when you found it rather than relying on someone else to do so? Sounds like the definition of lazy to me. Anotherclown (talk) 09:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-free file problems with [[:File:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg]]
Talk:Warren Mundine

message: This might want to mention his 2001 Senate bid, as well as his role in the Beazley leadership stuff. Rebecca 07:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Omissions @ 2006

message: If he is the cousin of Tony Mundine, he is not the uncle of Anthony Mundine.--Jack Upland (talk) 19:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not uncle 

message: Warren is an aborigine not an aboriginal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanbangeiko (talk • contribs) 04:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Either word should have a capital 'A'. --Scott Davis Talk 10:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  noun 

message: There appear to be conflicting approaches to use of past tenses here. We see "He was the first Aboriginal person to serve..." then the less common "Mundine would serve just one term as national president..." It's inconsistent at least, and slightly jarring for the reader. Any thoughts? Nickm57 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Much improved.Nickm57 (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenses in this article
Talk:Tiddas (band)

message: Although I've seen these guys live a few times, I'm crap with putting band in boxes.  Any suggestions as to what they actually are, because I really don't buy "folk" even though I put it there. - brenneman {L}  07:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folk? 

message: The ARIA awards page says "Sing About Love".  We go for verification, not truth, so I'm going to change the title to match the reference, even though I think it's wrong. - brenneman {L}  07:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added two refs which confirm the correct title, and mentioned in the description of the ARIA source that the title is shown there incorrectly..... ChrisTheDude 08:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the ARIA ref and adjusted the attached note. ARIA lists the title as both Sing About Love and Sing About Life at the 1994 ceremony.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album title 

message: Am curious as to why this article is listed under WikiProject Powderfinger, as far as I can tell Tiddas has no connection with Powderfinger or any of its band members - can anybody point out why it is listed as such.Dan arndt (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The group provided backing vocals for "The Day You Come" (August 1998), "Passenger" (August 1999), "Like a Dog" (January 2001) and "Thrilloilogy". They also accompanied Pf for live performances in the late '90s or early '00s. (See 1, 2). There may be other associations.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powderfinger connection 
Talk:Gate Keepers

message: In Sawa Ishige it is noted that she voiced Satoko Takanashi in Gate Keepers, but this name is not found in the article at all. Shinobu 05:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Satoko Takanashi is too minor a character to be included. She's one of Reiji's groupies who help found the Society for Political Thought headed by Reiji. Appears in Episodes 9, 13, and 19. Showers (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Satoko Takanashi 

message: Wasn't Junichi Sato (Sato Junichi) the executive director and one of the creators for this series, Gate Keepers? In the article he is only mentioned as the author of the OP lyrics, but I think he had a lot to do with the creation and structure of the series. Might be nice to mention that???  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.139.37 (talk) 00:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junichi Sato 
Talk:10th Light Horse Regiment (Australia)

message: Battle of Magdhaba and Battle of Rafa have links. These are two different battlesTushyk (talk) 20:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Magdhaba and Battle of Rafa 

message: I have re-added the cap badge after it was removed due to lack of source information. It now includes Source and Licensing information. Please post on my Talk Page before requesting Speedy Deletion. Xlh (talk) 02:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cap Badge 

message: I'm wondering how the opening paragraph can be improved... the unit is *not* the Australian 10th Light Horse Regiment, and hasn't been since the end of the Great War. It's 'A' Squadron 10th Light Horse Regiment, which is a very different title. If there are any takers for re-doing that opening sentence, fill your boots... I'll leave it a bit to let takers have a go before I take the plunge myself Xlh (talk) 09:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening Paragraph 

message: found this  on trove while searching for other information   posting here for those interested in further expansion. Gnangarra 12:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source on formation
Talk:Australian Mounted Division

message: *The AWM gives the following information about the photograph "Outdoor portrait of 3109 Trooper (Tpr) Alexander Gibson Forsyth, 4th Light Horse Regiment. Tpr Forsyth died of pneumonia on 2 April 1917 in England."
* Clearly Forsyth was not a member of the Australian Mounted Division, although he was in the 4th Light Horse Regiment; in one of the two squadrons sent to France which became the 2nd Anzac Mounted Regiment. When "the 13th Regiment went to France ... two squadrons of the 4th Regiment were also sent and joined to a squadron of the Otago Mounted Rifles to become the 2nd Anzac Mounted Regiment (eventually retitled XXII Corps Mounted Troops)." [Peter Dennis, Jeffrey Grey, Ewan Morris, Robin Prior with Jean Bou, The Oxford Companion to Australian Military History 2nd edition (Melbourne: Oxford University Press Australia & New Zealand, 2008) p. 319] This photograph does not depict anyone from Australian Mounted Division and is therefore not relevant to this article.--Rskp (talk) 07:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Front photo 
Talk:ANZAC Mounted Division

message: I suggest that the merging of the formation and service histories  alongside the selective merging of some of the battle sections. This would create better organisational structure and decrease the length of the table of contents. IronBattalion (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, if I was writing this from scratch, I would aim to work the formation and service histories in together, but given that this is  a mature article I have been reluctant to do this. I could live with it either way. If you do decide to merge the sections, I'd ask that is done in a manner that maintains text-source cohesion and narrative flow. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support I can do the whole structural change with only one major change in content, that is to move a small portion of the Formation section to be apart of Gaza. However, since this is massive change of structure compared to the precedent, I'm opening up a discussion to ensure there will be no edit warring with the change due to, as you mentioned, it being a mature article IronBattalion (talk) 08:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of History Sections
Talk:Live Hot Puppet Chat

message: Trying to confirm something here....KoalaTV didn't get banned solely because of Live Hot Puppet Chat...the ban had more to do with another program that had live sexual depictions, correct? OhNoitsJamieTalk 07:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: This article underwent an AfD with no consensus.  See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Hot Puppet Chat CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 21:46, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 
Talk:Chic Charnley

message: No reason that this article should be at Mr Charnley's "Sunday" name. He is routinely referred to by his nickname in the media and by fans, 95% of whom probably wouldn't have a clue what his real name is. As such, I'm going to move the page to Chic Charnley shortly if nobody objects. - Jellyman 07:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: I think the page needs some revise. It is said, that Charnley "will be best remembered as a player with Partick Thistle" and "Many Thistle supporters rate him the best player their club has had." but the page fails to mention WHY. 213.39.164.166 (talk) 11:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs some revise 

message: The samurai attack is mentioned twice. Should one of the references be deleted?
Asd36f (talk) 03:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samurai attack mentioned twice
Talk:Saildrive

message: How is this different than an inboard / outdrive (or stern drive) motor? -- Tawker 07:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: As a person who is not knowledgable in boats, this makes no sense to me at all. Why is this a "sail" drive? I assumed it would have something to do with sail power. What the hell is a "typical sailboat transmission"? Sailboats are sail powered. Why would one use this drive? On what sort of boat? What is it powered by? Why is it called a "sail drive"? Totally baffled here. AnnaGoFast (talk) 21:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sailboats larger than a dinghy have engines to get them in and out of port and also to move if there is no wind (or if the wind is very unfavorable such as head-on). The "sail" part is simply because they are the ones used on sailboats.MartinezMD (talk) 08:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This makes no sense to me.
Talk:Nuclear. Sad. Nuclear.

message: sup, that's really all right now.
I started the page and I didn't know if the nicknames should be posted or not.
Echoghost 20:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sup 
Talk:Zenki

message: Here's the episode title, and photographic evidence of the English cast. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  English credits 

message: This is clearly an inspiration from the Monkey King legend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.123.132.108 (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xi You Ji
Talk:Archbishop Temple School

message: Main priority is gathering references to defend claims. Alumni list would be useful. Photo gallery another nice addition. The picture of the car and the descriptiuons are really interesting. Are there no references. If you can do the cad/cam then you can work out how to use the references tag ... 8 wikipedians! We should have "GA" by the end of the month. I/we can help! Victuallers 14:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools Assessment

message: I removed some content from the article because it violated WP:NSR. However, keeping it in the talk page seems harmless and possibly even interesting. The content is below. -- Zawersh 07:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoid self-reference 

message: I'm removing several instances of "N/A"appearing in the text of the opening paragraph. I'm rewording it the best I can. Just seems too weird (and inappropriate) to put this abbreviation mid-sentence. In a table or something it would be fine, but this looks awful. If the information isn't known, it ought to just be omitted, rather than trying to use a placeholder.
Here's the original text:
:Archbishop Temple School was opened in N/A, then called William Temple School after Archbishop William Temple. It changed to its current name in N/A and became a Technology College in 1995 when the new British Aerospace Technology block was built. In 2006, the school became a Humanities college.
Jessicapierce 15:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing "N/A"