lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Electronic signatures and law

message: The link to China's digital signature law is also broken. --75.22.121.244 (talk) 02:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links 

message: The title of this article is misleading: see WP articles on electronic signtaures and digital signatures. 131.137.245.209 (talk) 18:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital versus electronic 

message: Could someone help with cleaning up ‎2001:16a2:c04f:ec3b:bf88:689e:6da:f2cb's edits?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1+1=yes (talk • contribs) 10:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:The best 33 football players of Ukraine

message: 16:47, 28 February 2017‎ Steel1943 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (42 bytes) (+42)‎ . . (Steel1943 moved page The best 33 (Ukraine) to The best 33: Remove unnecessary disambiguation) (thank)
: seems :uk:Список 33 найкращих футболістів сезону в СРСР is far more notable than the Ukraine list. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Copei

message: Christian democracy is part of the right-wing politics. COPEI, specifically, advocates for privatization of the key industries in the country therefore there is no way that this party touches the centre or even the left side of the political spectrum.Tony0106 (talk) 07:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be careful with your use of language (re "conspicuously suppresses") - the article has never been significantly longer than it is now. It (along with Democratic Action article, which is slightly better) need to be massively expanded. As topics of major significance for Venezuela, they should be developed to be at least Good Articles, if not Featured. Hopefully they will be one day. Rd232 talk 15:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  COPEI is a right-wing party. Don't change ideology 
Talk:Lucky (American TV series)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page. (non-admin closure)  — YoungForever(talk)  18:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucky (TV series) →  – Necessary disambiguation from the 2006 Indian television series of the same name, as per WP:INCDAB. And, no – the short-lived American series is not the primary subtopic: . --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 August 2020
Talk:Slutsky equation

message: someone just fixed the German language link, and it looks like a better article. Can anyone read German and perpahs make this one nicer? Pdbailey (talk) 06:20, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German-language article

message: Which one of these is the Slutsky matrix: is it Dpx or Dph?  This needs to be clarified since Slutsky matrix redirects here.  Richard Pinch (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is Dph. I agree this information should be added. Pdbailey (talk) 16:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed Dph. Some people keep changing it to  Dpx. So if you notice this occurring, please revert. I just changed it to Dph. 2600:4040:7AA1:1200:78AD:B186:993F:D546 (talk) 00:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slutsky matrix 

message: the text: "The above equation is also known as the Hicksian decomposition of demand. The left hand side of the equation represents how demand for one good changes in response to price changes for another good. The right hand side of the equation says that this change is equal to the change in demand holding expenditure fixed at w* plus the change in demand when income changes multiplied by how much income has to change to keep utility constant." has come pretty much straight out of the book by varian, but in varian it is referring to a different equation than the one given on the wikipedia page.
this confused me for a good 10 minutes, until i looked up the reference.
not sure i'm expert enough to correct it though, as i am still studying this topic!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.222.193 (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake in copying from varian
Talk:RMI Corporation

message: These links need to be updated to rmicorp.com, and since the site has updated, they have new locations.
Also, not sure what happened to the Orion products.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdq (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  razamicroelectronics.com links are dead 

message: If the name of the company has changed then the article needs to be moved to the new name and the old article redirected to this article using the Wikipedia "move" feature to preserve the change history.  --KJRehberg (talk) 15:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article successfully moved.  --KJRehberg (talk) 15:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change means redirect from the old name
Talk:FBG

message: Since the Fat Black Guy page has been removed, and neither the Goldfish (snack) or Fat Bottom Girls actually use the acronym FBG, then I propose that this page be changed to a redirect to the Fibre Bragg Grating article. Grahamwild (talk) 06:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change to Redirect

message: I think that this one could be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.128.190.2 (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Finnish Border Guard
Talk:Akobo River

message: There some descrepancies regarding the source of the Akobo between the article and map sources. The article states the following:
"From its source in the Ethiopian Highlands near Mizan Teferi it flows west..."
However, there are a number of map sources which suggest different sources:
The Global Watershed Database has the source far less into Ethiopia than Mizan Teferi: https://mghydro.com/watersheds/shared/756EB9.html
WikiMaps has the source similarly in from Mizan Teferi, but further south. In a number of maps this is noted as the Dima (river), but there is no article or mention of it here: https://wikimap.toolforge.org/?lang=en&page=Akobo_River
Map of the tributaries of the Pibor River: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/Sobat_OSM.png/500px-Sobat_OSM.png TypoSearcher7777 (talk) 21:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the Akobo?
Talk:Ranked-choice voting in the United States

message: Besides eliminating some of the bloat I think there should be a section which spells out the pros and cons of RCV made in debates over the introduction of RCV.  This section should also include references to the academic literature on empirical evidence for the effects of RCV.Blaze Droste1977 13:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In general this should probably be over at instant-runoff voting. –Sincerely, A Lime 06:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pros and Cons of RCV
File talk:The City and the Stars hardcover.jpg

message: A robot left
: 
I'm unable to see what, if anything, is invalid about the rationale other than perhaps the name of the image does not match the article it illustrates exactly?  When a robot tags an image it would really help if it also left behind a plain English explanation of exactly what it found wrong. Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 07:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, the rationale is no longer in dispute. I agree that BCBot's m.o. can be confusing at times. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 06:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is invalid about the rationale?
Category talk:Temples (LDS Church) in the United States

message: Looking through a few of the articles in this category, I have yet to see an article that meets notability guidleines. None have independent reliable sources with significant coverage demonstrating these are notable. Not every church in the world is notable, nor is every temple, only those that that have the afore mentioned sources. Either the sourcing needs to be added to each article or they need to be merged into an appropriate "temples of LDS" type article. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They are likely all notable, since there are only 100-odd such buildings in a church of 13 million persons. The articles need better sourcing, plain and simple. Snocrates 08:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cordillera Central (Luzon)

message: I came looking for details on elevation/summits and general geography, this is more of a region/culture/history article; in normal Wikipedia terms this should be two separate articles...for now it needs more actual geographic details, lists of peaks, rivers/basins etc...(Skookum1 not logged in).223.205.210.46 (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: needs split, this is both a region and a range article

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 22:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:LucidEra

message: The "Competing SaaS BI Companies" section of the article is getting out of hand, it seems as if every single company that is trying to brand itself is added by some anonymous IP. If they are similar they should be under "See also", if they were indeed competitors during the existence of LucidEra Inc. they should be on that list. Is anyone willing to give the list a crunch and verify what belongs and what should be thrown out or moved to "See also"? Right now I am tempted to remove it and condense it to a "See also", leaving out all companies without a Wikipedia article. -- Dront (talk) 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competing SaaS BI Companies 

message: I object to deletion. If there are some deficiencies in the artlce, let's identify them and fix them. I've made another round of editing to remove words that could be interpreted to be promotional. Let me know if there are further improvements to be made. I haven't read that blog entry, nor did I know that that would happen to coincide with recent edits. I think the article can stand on its own merits regardless of what someone chooses to blog about it. Leboris (talk) 07:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Relevant guideline may be found here: Wikipedia:CORP. The article appears to cite all relevant sources, and is not reliant on press releases as supporting material. In fact, much of the information can only be derived from the industry press, since they are not available directly from company sources. Leboris (talk) 07:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On deletion 
Talk:Linearity (writing)

message: There was an odd comment about it being uncertain whether Chinese is linear or not. It's as linear as the Latin alphabet, so if we want to go there, we need to classify which styles of calligraphy are linear, not which scripts. kwami (talk) 07:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

message: This is not what I expected at all. I thought linear writing meant that letters proceed in a line, unlike many abugidas or Hangul where signs for sequential sounds are spatially arranged in a more complex way. I've tagged the article asking for sources. --JWB (talk) 03:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong meaning?
Talk:Bloodthirsty Butchers (film)

message: Why was this page nominated for speedy deletion? It does not meet the terms presented--not about a person, organization, or web content.
:It shouldn't have been.P4k (talk) 08:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The notability was probably in question. The page is notable because of Sweeney Todd. I've assumed it's a horror movie and added a stub tag. Also sometime this page needs to be redirected to Bloodthirsty Butchers (film)TehSpud (talk) 01:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Old
Bloodthirsty Butchers is based on the Sweeney Todd character originally created by Thomas Peckett Prest in 1846 and later adapted into many different works. It is the story of a barber and baker that work together to murder people and latter cook them into tasty pies. The movie was not much of a success.
New
Bloodthirsty Butchers is a 1970 horror film adaptation of Sweeney Todd by Thomas Peckett Prest in 1846. Andy Milligan directed the film which stars, Annabella Wood as Johanna, Berwick Kaler as Tobias, Jane Helay as Maggie Lovett, and John Miranda as Sweeney Todd. The film centers on the murders committed by Sweeney Todd and Maggie Lovett.  TehSpud (talk) 02:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redrafted First Paragraph. 

message: This page has been moved from Bloodthirsty Butchers (Movie) to Bloodthirsty Butchers (film) by Spud Hai/watidone  —Preceding comment was added at 02:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved Page
Talk:List of Kodomo no Jikan characters

message: Hey just saying, whoever wrote this page put some unnecessarily complicated words in here. I edited Kuro's article and tried to simplify them. Just so that more people can understand it better, I myself had to reread some parts a few times before I understood what it was saying. I plan on doing this for the rest of the article too. No objections, right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.22.100 (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WVXR

message: The Ownership information in this article differs from the FCC ownership report, which is the cited source.  The Licensee of the station is Vox AM/FM LLC, which is wholly owned by Bruce Danziger through the Vox Radio Group, LP.  The parent company also has a subsidiary named Great Northern.  There is no entity named Great Eastern Broadcasting in the FCC ownership reports.  Whatever the relationship is between "Great Eastern" and Vox AM/FM is not explained by any sources, and hence is "original research".StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Halloween Is Grinch Night

message: What the heck does this mean?  "...and then shows him doing a 12-inch geet with his teeth."
76.121.179.92 (talk) 08:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is not wikipedia's job to promote fan theories.  It is the article's job to store verifiable information.  In order to include this kind of fancruft ( see here  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fancruft ) we would need reliable sources.  A single thinkpiece does not count as such.  Wickedjacob (talk) 11:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fan theory
Talk:Ludwig Heilmann

message: Heilmann entered the Reichswehr on 3 February 1921, serving with Infanterie-Regiment 21 (21st Infantry Regiment) of the 7. (Bayerische) Division. On 3 February 1933, having served for twelve years, he left the military service holding the rank of Feldwebel. After taking a number of courses he was reactivated on 1 July 1934 as an Oberleutnant and commander of the 5th Company, 20th Infantry Regiment.
During the Battle of France he won the Iron Cross first class with III Battalion of the Infanterie-Regiment 91 (91st Infantry Regiment) of the 27. Infanterie-Division. Heilmann joined the parachute troops on 18 June 1940. After various courses and postings Major Heilmann became commander of III Battalion, 1st Parachute Regiment. His battalion was dropped into Crete on 20 May 1941 as part of the first wave. Heilmann's battalion played a part in the German success on the island.
In late autumn 1941 Heilmann and his battalion were sent to Russia, where they fought as infantry. Among the unit's actions was the defense of the Vyborgskaya bridgehead. Heilmann was promoted to Oberstleutnant on 20 April 1942. On 20 August 1943 he became commander of IV Battalion, 3rd Parachute Regiment and on 15 November regimental commander.
After the Allied landing in Sicily Heilmann and his regiment parachuted into the Catania Plain to reinforce "Battle Group Schmalz" of the Fallschirm-Panzer Division 1 "Hermann Göring". His battalion fought near Francoforte, tried to defend Centuripe near Regalbuto, Bronte and Maletto. On 1 December 1943 Heilmann was promoted to Oberst.
On the Italian mainland Heilmann's regiment fought near Ortona, where on 15 December it ran into an assembly of enemy forces. His I and II Battalions, led by Major Rudolf Böhmler and Hauptmann Gotthart Liebscher, and took Villa Grande. Ortona was held until 28 December.
Heilmann's regiment also took part in the defensive Battle of Monte Cassino. The third battle of Cassino saw it in the focal point of the battle for the monastery mountain.
On 23 September 1944 Heilmann became the commanding officer of the 5. Fallschirmjäger-Division, which subsequently fought in the Ardennes. It was here in the south of battlezone where the 5th was ordered to defend the flank from attacks by the U.S. 3rd Army. Heilmann was captured by the Americans just prior to the end of the war and was released in 1947.
K.e.coffman (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited content
Talk:Hans Kroh

message: Are there editors interested in improving the article? Otherwise, per WP:V, I plan to remove the"Biography" section content as uncited since Jan 2016. Please let me know. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography section 

message: Please let me know of any feedback or concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:43, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit per Jan 2016 tag
Talk:Blink (CSI: NY)

message: I don't know if anyone has seen this episode and read the Mark Billingham book Sleepyhead. The book was first published in 2001, and the storyline is almost identical to this episode of CSI: NY that aired in September 2002,albeit in a British setting, about a man that tries to get his victims into the locked up state and fails a few times before, killing his victims, however one is left alive. I was wondering if anyone knew if this was intentional or if it was just a coincidence? --DrMotley (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Billingham
Talk:My Nanny (CSI: Miami)

message: Why is the article titles "My Nanny" when every other page refers to the episode as "CSI: My Nanny"? Isn't the second the official title of the episode, and shouldn't that be the title of the article? --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû 08:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title
Talk:Payback (CSI: Miami)

message: Hi, I was searching for data of this episode and my starting point was the director's name listed at the end of the episode: Joe Chappelle. According to the given data this one is directed by Sam Hill. I assume this is wrong.
Also, in the list of episodes, in the headline of the 4th season, the "Director" and the "Writer" text is changed with each other for mistake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.131.48.200 (talk) 04:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  director
Talk:No Man's Land (CSI: Miami)

message: I think that the plot description is too long and almost sounds like an adaptation of the episode for a book. Take this line for example:
""Eric?" Horatio whispers shakily as he starts towards the lifeless body of his friend."
I'm sorry, but I don't think it's in line with Wikipedia's style, but I won't change it as I haven't seen this episode. Jedd the Jedi (talk) 13:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lengthy plot description
Talk:Eclipse (video game)

message: The release date in the heading of the Mod DB entry (Aug 03, 2006), and also in the mod's profile, is apparently the release date of a gameplay movie, not the release date of the mod itself. The release date of the mod (Jun 17, 2005) is mentioned in the news section (as referenced in the article). --Pizzahut2 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: What's the point of the current screenshot?  You can't see anything :\  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PCLM (talk • contribs) 14:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot 
Talk:Big Six cricket dispute of 1912

message: Does this really warrant a separate article?  Could it not be better done as a section within 1912 Triangular Tournament, at least until its expanded sufficiently to fork into its own space. —Moondyne 10:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is plenty of scope for an article.  At the moment I am trying to determine the best way to include the dispute in this fortnight's WP:ACOTF, Cricket Australia.  This article will allow a lot of the detail to be covered there. -- Mattinbgn\talk 10:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Warrant a separate article? Ahhhh, do you know the history of Aus cricket? This is the  most important happening in the history of Aus cricket, pre-1977. It should eventually link to many articles.  Phanto282 (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A little.  My suggestion was to keep it within the 1912 article until it had been expanded.  Right now it says practically nothing and is unsourced.  The McAlister/Hill fisticuffs and Clem Hill's premature career end are probably the most significant issues and they don't get a mention.  —Moondyne 13:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Ok, given the above, how about we start this discussion again.  The question raised by Moondyne was not questioning the notability of the subject.  I am sure he knows enough about the subject to understand its significance.  What he was asking (I think?) was given the content at present, is it better including this in 1912 Triangular Tournament until enough content has been added to justify a spin-out article.  This is a reasonable question that makes no inference about the existing content.
My answer, as stated above, is that the current ACOTF is Cricket Australia which will cover a lot of the same ground.  Covering the "Big Six" at any reasonable level of detail would require a spin out article anyway, so we may as well keep this now that it has been created.  If a decision to merge is made, I suggest Cricket Australia#History is a better option than 1912 Triangular Tournament.  I would also like to extend an invitation to all editors to join the collaboration at WP:ACOTF and bring the article on Cricket Australia up to a reasonable level.  -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Matt, everything you  say is spot on. Cricket Australia#History is a much better place than the 1912 tournament article.  On the other hand, if this is going to be expanded reasonably significantly and reasonably promptly, leave it here.  I wouldn't like to see it stay here in its current state for more than a few days though. —Moondyne 03:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lets start again

message: Three of the tourists who did tour: Matthews, Smith and Carkeek were also VFL footballers.  Armstrong and Trumper were also. —Moondyne click! 14:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Lists of automobile-related articles

message: What happened to the list of makers by country?  Trekphiler (talk) 06:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :List of cars. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 17#List of cars until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of cars" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]