Talk:Flicker noise

message: Are Cosmological Effects the Source of l/f Noise in Electron Devices?
This is just crackpottery, right? — Omegatron 00:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I wonder what people think about merging this article into the main pink noise article?
I would argue for this on two grounds.  One is that this is a very short article and, since flicker noise is a special case of 1/f noise, it can easily be included in the more general article, gaining from the wider context provided.  The second is that, conversely, flicker noise is of great historical importance to the general subject since it was the first observed (and one of the most widely studied) examples of 1/f noise.
Thoughts, anyone? —WebDrake 21:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Deary me, that'll teach me to post without checking all related talk pages.  I hope I haven't offended those who bravely struck out to make this as a separate article only a short while ago.  Nevertheless I feel that as things stand it might be good to bring the articles back together.  If the flicker noise info grows we can expand it into a separate article again (with which I will gladly assist:-).  As it is, I've added some important early references that are also included in the pink noise article. —WebDrake 22:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, accepted.  Let's get back to the 1/f noise argument on Talk:Pink noise. —WebDrake 19:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Pink noise]]? 

message: The article should be edited to point out that the 1/f noise corner is completely dependent upon the broadband/thermal noise floor.
137.71.224.55 (talk) 01:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1/f Noise Corner 

message: I am the original author of the measurement section.  It was removed and reinterpreted in 2010.  I don't disagree since I didn't cite sources; and I am not sure it really belonged here.  Perhaps in a electronic noise section?  Also it was mislabeled in the follower sense: it was intended to address the engineering evaluation (interpreted as "drift") of the effects of 1/f noise sources on measurement.  These occur frequently in Infrared Eng. and compensation requires frequent re-zeroing/re-calibration of the system.  By calculating the drift we are able to determine how often this needs to be done.
Comments on putting it in a new category; and references for the calculation are welcome.  They are simple enough but probably should be referenced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrogers314 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Flicker noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060813185326/http://www.rane.com:80/par-f.html to http://www.rane.com/par-f.html#flicker_noise
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello,
I am not really familiar with Wikipedia guidelines, and am more of a browser of this website. Link number [8] in the article, i.e., Rick Jenkins' "All the noise in resistors" leads to an empty page that has long been deleted. How does one rectify such an occurrence? 142.58.196.123 (talk) 08:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You add an archive link to it: https://web.archive.org/web/20140606215525/http://www.hartmantech.com/codesign/forum/blog.php?action=view&article_id=1 Em3rgent0rdr (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead External Link