lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Audoin (bishop)

message: 1. Who canonized?
2. What cultus?
Avoid Alban Butler, folks. A long time ago, I'd fill in saints, but I'd never just paste. If this is one of the many, many, many medieval saints canonized as part of the political movements of consolidation, then that's fine -- the saint's importance is due to legend and geography -- but grafting Butler is a bit . . . below the bar. 64.234.66.158 (talk) 17:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sigh.  The first formally "canonized" saint was St. Homobono of Cremona in 1199. All saints before that date have "traditional" cults. Your blatant Anti-Catholicism in saying the Butler is "as bit below the bar" shows your ignorance. P.S. I have a doctorate in medieval history from U.C. Berkeley. 50.230.37.66 (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information 

message: Although the caption says 'Statue of St Audoin (left) and St Waninge (right), in Fécamp, France,' the saint on the left is actually St Ouen and St Audoin is not represented in the image.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.202.171 (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Audoin is apparently also known as Ouen and Owen. Mannanan51 (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture is not of this saint  
Talk:Paraskevi

message: the "day of preparation" for the Sabbath, i.e. Friday) 
Ambiguous, leaving it unclear whether the Friday refers to the day or preparation or the Sabbath itself.
Suggest 'the "day of preparation for the Sabbath", i.e. Friday)' 
DruartG (talk) 07:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Red seal ships

message: Here is a map I made of Japanese foreign trade (Red seal ships) in the early 17th century (referenced from "Histoire du Japon", Michel Vie, ). Could someone kindly include the map in the article (first paragraph)? Thank you PHG (talk) 20:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: In the article, a man called Yamada Yahei is mentioned to have travelled to Indochina and Siam in 1634 in the timeline. Is there any source for this? I've researched the name, but found nothing of use pointing to anything except this article. Is he perhaps the same man as Hamada Yahei, who had a conflict in Taiwan with Pieter Nuyts in 1628? I've found nothing in the sources about Hamada to imply his whereabouts in 1634, or that he should ahve visited Indochina or Siam. I don't speak Japanese, but the Japanese reading of his name doesn't turn up with useful results either. Can anyone please clarify where this man is mentioned, otherwise he should be removed. Fijure (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamada Yahei 

message: Entire page is almost devoid of citations. Roeshe (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severe Lack of Citations
Talk:Ronald Cass

message: On the edits to the Ronald Cass page on March 9 (the latest time was somewhere around 4:45), I forgot to login before editing, and so it doesnt say who did all of the edits for that day. It was me, so I'm sorry about that!
Betben08 (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry for any confusion..
Talk:Paschal Baylón

message: The article on Pentecost makes no mention of this name for Pentecost.  The article on the name Pascal has a link to a Catholic Encyclopedia article on Pascal Baylon which states what is stated here but gives no support for it, or for the statement that this is why he was named Pascal.  I suggest that in the absence of any support this be removed.  Pascal is a common enough name. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it should be removed, but for a different reason. The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Vol. II, page 2112, gives as the definition of "paschal" the following: "1. Of or pertaining to Passover. 2. Of or pertaining to Easter; used in Easter celebrations." Perhaps his parents were confused as to the meaning of the term. Harriet Elwell (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pascal, Pascual comes from Pascua, Latin for Easter. 50.75.66.18 (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pasch of the Holy Ghost" 

message: This article is missing his association with feeding the poor (and feeding them better than broth and leftovers). San Pascual (sometimes San Pasqual) is particularly venerated for this by Hispanic Catholics in North and Latin America, and often depicted with trays, bowls, or tables of food as quasi-regalia.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing association with food
Talk:Paternus

message: Regarding this article and Padarn, please see Category_talk:Saints_articles_needing_attention#Padarn_and_Paternus. Carminowe of Hendra (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Paterne de Vannes, évêque de Vannes, supposé mort entre 490 et 511. Fête le 15 avril.
Paterne de Cardigan, saint solitaire du Pays de Galles, supposé mort vers 550. Fondateur de plusieurs monastères et églises dans le comté de Cardigan. Parfois confondu soit avec l'évêque de Vannes, soit avec celui d'Avranches. Fête le 15 avril." It is not clear whether there should be two articles or one.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Padarn/Paternus
Talk:Eutychius of Constantinople

message: Please, Please, don't cut and paste from public domain sources.  They often have problems with style and POV, due to their age and original audience.  -- Pastordavid 11:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut and paste 

message: I've done a fair bit of work here, but there's still a lot to be done.  It really requires more of an expert eye than I have since it's pretty specialized information. --edi 04:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I have never heard of Prinkipo called Principus before, but I might be limited.  More importantly, the article linked to, does not have the word Principus anywhere.  I will change it here if there are no problems.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principus?
Talk:Italica

message: Italica was the birthplace of the Roman Emperors Trajan and Hadrian
:Hadrian was born to a well-established family which had originated in Picenum in Italy and had subsequently settled in Italica, Hispania Baetica (originally Hispania Ulterior).
--hello,gadren 00:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he born?
Talk:Menas of Constantinople

message: I started Patriarch Mennas at "mid" importance.  Feel free to move up, after checking out other saints in the High-class. (Eastern Christianity is one of my blindspots, and I figure it is easier to move someone up the importance scale if I rate too low, than it is to move down).  Thanks -- Pastordavid 02:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject importance
Talk:Battle of Shimonoseki

message: The article is written in truly bad English, and is clearly Japanese nationalist in tone. It's author apparently believes that traditional Japanes attacks on foreign shipping can be justified. 
It should be noted that this battle was entirely initiated by the Japanese warlord and the foreign powers took no serious advantage of their victory, but during this period, Japanese were conquering Hokkaido and wiping out the native Ainu. And within thirty years of this minor battle, the Japanese were on a rampage in China and in another decade had defeated Russia and annexed vast foreign territories. 
Japanese feelings of victimisation are quite precious. The article should be eliminated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:::What the Japanese did in Hokkaido and China later has absolutely zero bearing on the events at Shimonoseki. Historical events must be taken in their context, and not within some racist anti-Japanese schema. As for eliminating the article entirely, I hope you're kidding. To erase knowledge of an event from history, just because some people don't like the way it happened? That's not how free and open societies deal with things. I am going to go look at the article now, see what I can fix and change. LordAmeth 10:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Remarkably Bad Article
Talk:Proclus of Constantinople

message: to Archbishop Proclus of Constantinople, as Constantinple was only raised to Patriarchate at Chalcedon in 451. --InfernoXV 18:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Rename 
Talk:Patronage of the Blessed Virgin Mary

message: I've just read that the Virgin Mary is officially recognised as an "Admiral of the Bolivian Navy", and was formally crowned in 1925 as "Queen of the Bolivian Republic".  I know it sounds absurd, but I'm not making this up.  It's from a newspaper article ("Virgin on the miraculous", about Copacabana, Bolivia, by Campbell Smith, in The Age, 3 July 2004).  Is there any truth to this?  --  JackofOz 04:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bolivia
Talk:Paul I of Constantinople

message: The article lists him as the 6th Bishop of Constantinople - but there were clearly more bishops in the succession of this see...  is this because of the renaming on Byzantium to Constantinople?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsheep (talk • contribs) 12:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sixth Bishop?
Talk:Paul of Narbonne

message: In this edit you added the text "buring in the quire". Should that have been "burying"? -- John of Reading (talk) 13:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Opp: "buried in the quire" Thank you for noting this!--Wetman (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  buring in the quire
Talk:Paul of the Cross

message: Responding to the request for assessment.  This is a great "start-class" article.  The prose could use just a little bit of work.  A few suggestions: (1) take the references at the end, and add in-text citations throughout the article, (2) add external links, (3) get the article into the proper categories.  -- Pastordavid 19:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The article lists St. Paul of the Cross' feast day as Oct 19. The article at http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=810 lists his feast day as Oct 20. Is this Wikipedia article incorrect?  -- JeffFerguson 14:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To my knowledge, he is still celebrated on 19 October in the universal church; it is in the dioceses of the US that he is celebrated on 20 October. Carl.bunderson (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Feast Day Oct 19 or Oct 20?

message: potatoes are cool  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.91.191.173 (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  lone wolf
Talk:Edo-period village

message: This is actually a really hot topic in scholarship right now, and the articles written on it could fill a good number of books. We definitely need a lot more here. If I had the time or inclination, I would... LordAmeth 15:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I suggest changing the title from Edo-period village to the Japanese term Mura. The new form could be Mura (Japanese village) or something to that effect. It seems more appropriate. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Rudi Carrell

message: Why is he in the category "deaf musicians"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.233.202.2 (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the category. He was not deaf. Probably a typo. doxTxob \ talk 22:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaf Musician? 

message: There is passage that is simply ridiculous in its lack of truhfulness:
"His show was also pretty popular in some other European non-German speaking countries like Slovenia where his reunions between long lost friends or relatives became part of popular culture."
Not only am I from Slovenia, but I was an active part of the media in the 1990s - and I only occasionally heard of him. Furthermore, I don't recall his show ever being broadcast in Slovenia itself, although many may have watched it on any of the foreign channels that were, and are, seen in the country.
Anyway, I think the reference to Slovenia definitely does NOT represent a real situation, clearly being the personal opinion of a single individual, and should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.61.54.250 (talk) 10:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, and I am from Slovenia too (I didn't have "an active part of the media in the 1990s" as you though), but I can tell you that I personally know many people (and their families) that were watching the "Rudi Carrell Show". -Wayfarer (talk) 22:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Part of popular culture" in Slovenia - really...?!
Talk:Rugby union in Japan

message: On what basis does eating meat rather than fish mean the people will grow bigger?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.7.84 (talk) 08:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: i am maraia rokobiau i was 15years old i was looking for scolarship in japan 27.123.139.8 (talk) 19:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Fudai daimyō

message: This article links to the ja wiki's article for "fudai daimyo." However, this article's title is still fudai. The fact that the ja wiki splits it into two articles-- fudai and fudai daimyo respectively-- bears some consideration. Are there any opinions on this? -Tadakuni (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The English article covers the topic of fudai daimyo. I'd favor renaming it that. And renaming Tozama to match. Fg2 (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Can I go ahead and move/rename? I've got the sources on hand right now to do so and expand/cite the new articles well. -Tadakuni (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't protest Fg2 (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fudai vs. Fudai daimyo?
Talk:Peregrine Laziosi

message: The article now refers to his ailment in one place as an infection, and in another place as cancer. 76.30.240.113 (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancer or Infection?
Talk:Peter Chanel

message: Need to clarify Peter Chanel#Marist_.26_Missionary, then copyedit. Paulmnguyen (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The whole Fact and fiction section belongs on the talk page, not in the article. Rwflammang (talk) 23:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it wholesale from the article. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 17:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  fact and fiction 

message: If you are going to call him Peter, then the first bit would probably read better as "Peter Louis Mary Chanel (in French Pierre Louis Marie Chanel)" --2607:FEA8:D5DF:1AF0:DBD:BB97:BC27:B922 (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter or Pierre
Talk:Peter the Iberian

message: What is the "well known theory" that Peter was the pseudo-Dionysius? ThePeg 17:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I have done a little research about the Saint and I see that somebody has reverted my edits without any explanation. It is really irritating when somebody just deletes your research. Giglia (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. This is a common problem on Wikipedia. So, you should watch the article closely. Strangely enough, I found that this page was not on my watchlist although I have also edited it and its subject is within the scope of my interest. :)--KoberTalk 16:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of my research 

message: To say "he is also recognized by various eastern Churches, some of which have deviated from the Orthodox doctrine" in indication that the Non-Chalcedonian churches are not orthodox is a clear violation of NPOV. I am going to change the wording to "from the Chalcedonian doctrine". If anyone objects, please speak up. Deusveritasest (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chalcedonian POV 

message: Are you sure this is the image of peter the Iberian because the writings in the image are Armenian. I'm gonna be nice and not delete it but find the correct image of Peter the Iberian or explain why their is Armenian writings in this image.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArmenianbyDNA (talk • contribs) 05:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Peter the Iberian
Talk:Asa Brainard

message: Some of this may belong in articles on the Excelsiors, Nationals (not much), and Red Stockings tours of 1860, 1867, and 1869. Some may belong in an article on civilian baseball during the Civil War. Not to mention Excelsior and Cincinnati club articles. Writing a Brainard stub certainly would be quite different with those articles "on board"! 
The two Notes include stray material of another kind. Anyone who expands this will read the notes and think about them, right? Who but I is likely to be the one? --P64 00:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  stuffed with tidbits 

message: I deleted Cincinnati Red Stocking players category, because he never officially played for any team of that name since the organized professional leagues began (1871).  Now, I do realize that he played for the famed 1869-70 Cincinnati Red Stockings thay moved and became the Boston Red Stockings, so if anyone wants to make a category with players for just those teams, it would make better sense.Neonblak 14:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category Deletion
Talk:Phallic saint

message: Sounds like the name of a rock band.
Cuev: Thanks for the idea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.93.203 (talk) 23:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas Devin

message: "They suffered almost 200 casualties in the battle, an unprecedented loss for a cavalry brigade." This line seems a bit sensational, especially given losses that Union mounted units suffered later in the war. Might some context, such as 'losses higher than Union cavalry had seen prior to this time' be more appropriate?Intothatdarkness (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Cavalry Losses 
Talk:Namamugi Incident

message: note 2 -"The British victims were caused by Satsuma cannonry" - how about correcting this to: The British casualties were caused by Satsuma cannon ..... HammerFilmFan (talk) 02:32, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammar needs work 

message: It's not at all clear if the amount paid was £100,000 or £25,000. Spicemix (talk) 16:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compensation 

message: This ought to be consistent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.120.87 (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Borrodaile or Borradaile?

message: "In Japan, the samurai had a legal right known as kiri-sute gomen which allowed them to kill anyone of a lower class for perceived disrespect, which would have justified the killing by Shimazu's retinue."
This contradicts the article on kiri-sure which states that only a single retaliatory strike was allowed. Per the conditions given in that article, the first strike would have been perfectly legal, while the 1) coup de grace by 2) multiple assailants would have both been very much illegal. These two articles can't both be correct unless the associated authorities were corrupt and willing to look past Shimazu's obvious dishonor. Not sure what to suggest besides getting the input of a genuine expert on kiri-sute gomen laws and whether they were actually enforced to help set the record straight. Either he very definitely broke the law or he didn't; the facts are too plain here to argue any kind of edge case. (At least, without bringing up that Richardson was a foreigner, but I don't find that point relevant if indeed kiri-sute gomen was seen as an act of self-defense, a samurai's life and honor being very much tied together). 68.60.202.174 (talk) 01:55, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with Kiri-Sute Gomen article
Talk:Pietro I Orseolo

message: I think there's some confusion between Pietro I and II in the timeline. Otto Orseolo would likely be Pietro's grandson, if I can tell correctly. This article suggests both that Otto is his son but also that he visited him in 1008, which is twenty years after his listed death. matt91486 (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline
Talk:Oniwaban

message: This is showing up in all my JA sources as お庭番 (oniwaban), i.e. with no shū on the end.  See w:ja:御庭番 as an example.  Would anyone object to moving this article to Oniwaban?  -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 04:15, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper title?
Template talk:Information

message: Request: On lines 65–66, make the following change:
*Before:
}}
|}
*After:
}}|}<noinclude>
(That is, the only change is to remove this line break). This is necessary because in most cases there is an extra space added below the permission field (i.e., unless there is another field added below for other versions or other information). See for example :File:The Pirates of Penzance (H. M. Brock).png. This would remove this spacing error (in line with other templates, incl. the Information template on Commons). D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: But not done in the suggested way, which would not have resolved the problem. It's always good to test out a hypothesis like this in the sandbox and on the testcases page.  – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 15 February 2022 

message: The parameter additional_information did not work for me. Is it obsolete? Should the article on this template be corrected?--Gciriani (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parameter additional_information not working
Talk:Pope Caius

message: There isn't really a Roman name "Caius" -- rather, there was a Roman name Gaius, which for complicated reasons connected with the early history of the Latin alphabet, was often abbreviated by the single initial "C" (not "G").  "Caius" is almost always a corrupted reading (except in Gonville and Caius college, where it's a pretentious pseudo-Latinization of the English surname "Keys"). AnonMoos 08:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I changed the city of birth from Solin to Salona because here in Wikipedia there are two links and two articles: one (Solin, Croatia) for the modern Croatian town and the other (Salona) for the ancient town, Illyrian first and then Latin, where Caius was born. In present times Salona is situated near today's town of Solin. (Sorry for my very poor English)--Luigi 28 (talk) 23:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town