Talk:Federal Reserve

message: No discussion on the history of the national income tax being paired with fed reserve creation?  Also, no discussion on where some of citizens tax money goes, to interest payments on the national debt? 173.172.127.147 (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are confusing disparate subjects. You would need to make specific proposals, backed by valid references in order to start a discussion. SPECIFICO talk 02:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

text: No, because it wasn't, and no, because it's irrelevant. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Income tax 

message: Recently added to a section* pertaining to the CPI - however this was not deemed relevant. Any opinions that say it may be relevant / noteworthy to include? :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by BlockchainusMaximus (talk • contribs) 
:Please see WP:NOTNEWS and WP:WEIGHT. SPECIFICO talk 22:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPI 

message: I have rewritten the talk page FAQ to address questions / objections raised frequently on this talk page. A link to the Board of Governors' FAQ is included at the end. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: FAQ

message: User:A. C. Santacruz tagged this section for excessive use of quotations. The section is mostly quotations, one of which spans four paragraphs. I condensed and paraphrased it, and this was reverted by User:Beauty School Dropout who called it "unhelpful" and said that "disputed topics" should be discussed. First, I was acting on someone else's request, which is the definition of "helpful." Second, I don't see a content dispute here. No concern about the neutrality or factual accuracy of the section has been raised. If someone wants to make a case for keeping the section as it was, they can do that here. Otherwise there is no dispute, only obstruction. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: IP, please do not attribute your edits to me. I do agree that the section was over-quoted heavily, but I am not accountable or responsible for how you respond to a clean-up tag that I place. I'll take a look later to see if I agree or not with your edit, and if not I'll propose some alternative phrasing. Let's all try to resolve this constructively without engaging in an edit war. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 20:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  and , I believe IP's summary is more encyclopedic than the previous version. If there are any things you believe they shouldn't have removed, I suggest we build upon IP's version. Feel free to discuss below. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 20:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

text: , that's fair. Your wikignoming is appreciated :) ! A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 20:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm with  on this one - I'm not a subject matter expert, just a pending changes reviewer, so I'll leave it to more knowledgeable people to resolve. I'll say this, though, to IP - I'm much more likely to revert anonymous changes than those done by registered users, so you might do yourself a favour and create an account. Cheers, Kiwipete (talk) 08:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Term Deposit Facility