Talk:Trier

message: By the time Romulus Augustulus, last Roman Emperor in the West, was deposed by the Ostrogoths, the Vandals had conquered the province of Africa -- not Egypt, though -- Visigoths had by this time conquered the Iberian peninsula and the southern half of Gaul. The entire northern half of Roman Gaul, from Tours north, remained under Roman Administration for ten years after the deposure of Augustulus, until 486. After this, perhaps another ten years or more, approaching the start of the sixth century, deep within Germany actually only just east of what is now Luxumborg(1), the Roman people of Trier still remained autonomous. --T. Mc. 22:42, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Tom, 
you wrote: "The entire northern half of Roman Gaul, from Tours north, remained under Roman Administration for ten years after the deposure of Augustulus, until 486. After this, perhaps another ten years or more, approaching the start of the sixth century, deep within Germany actually only just east of what is now Luxumborg(1), the Roman people of Trier still remained autonomous". 
Well, there was the Duchy of Syagrius until 486. But your conclusion is wrong, because your detail information is wrong.
Your cardinal error is to believe, Trier was part of Syagrius roman Duchy. In fact, Trier was never part of this last roman remain in middle europe. Syagrius territorry lied mostly on today french territory (concentrated around the regions Ile de France and Normandie). The eastern border of Syagrius territory ended roundabout at the valley of the river Maas(or Meuse in french), east of Reims and the Somme River in the north, all this is miles west from Trier. During the time Syagrius was defeated by the frankish king Clovis, Trier already belonged to the frankish kingdom, called Francia in latin speaking sources, it did no longer belong to Gallia. There are dozens of good maps and books about it. By the way: There are some historians saying that the Syagrius Duchy is only a myth of later centuries, celebrating the last noble Mohican of Rome. But this is only theory. 
So, I don`t know why you insist on your error. You can`t rewrite history without having reliable sources. 
Emettlach 09:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trier remaining autonomous?  

message: How is the name pronounced? 71.248.115.187 03:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The statement about being the capital of the Roman Empire is highly dubious; I suppose it is a typo for the Holy Roman Empire (which was neither Roman not an empire), but I could not find evidence of it either in the articles about the HRE. Can anyone shed light on this? I put a citationneeded tag but did not erase the claim (yet). 193.175.53.21 (talk) 14:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. The statement is true. Trier was imperial residence and capital of the (north-) westroman empire for a decade around the year 300 AC. AFAIK it became imperial residence in 293. Google will give you a lot of citations. Regards --Andreas.husch (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

text: By any definition, the HRE was an empire. But that's not the topic here. In the West, Roman emperors did not reside in Rome after the Severan dynasty, for the most part. They resided with some large army headquarters to be at the center of defense against the barbarians. While Marcus Aurelius spent much of his life on the frontier, officially he kept Rome as the capitol.104.169.41.8 (talk) 17:14, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital of the Roman Empire? 

message: There is no mention on the Charles V Charles Quint page that he was a resident of Trier.  Shouldn't Wikipedia be internally self consistent?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.209.238 (talk) 05:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Charles V might have visited Trier but didn't "reside" there for a longer period. I deleted him from the residents list- Nachtschicht (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles V as Resident of Trier 

message: So, I was skimming about the Worms, Germany page and it said that this, Worms, and Cologne are the three oldest cities in Germany. Anyway, Trier was founded in 16(Or 18?) BC, yet Cologne was founded in 38 BC, 20/22 years earlier. Can someone confirm and edit this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.59.32.96 (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is perhaps explained at History of Cologne - the settlement was founded in 38 (or 39?) BC, but Cologne only acquired city status in 50 AD, after Trier. --David Edgar (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest City in Germany? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Trier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://redaktion.trier.de/praefectus/trier?tourist_en
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120131082852/http://www.statistik.rlp.de/fileadmin/dokumente/berichte/A1033_201022_hj_G.pdf to http://www.statistik.rlp.de/fileadmin/dokumente/berichte/A1033_201022_hj_G.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified