lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Golden Man (collection)

message: I have added some links to content that appears on the official fan site for Philip K. Dick (that has be recognized by the Philip K. Dick Estate and is linked to from philipkdick.com). There is a complicated history for this site and I realize at one point it has been taken over by malware. The site has changed hands two times and the malware no longer exists on the site. The site was rebuilt from scratch, is stable and will be around for a long time.
The site now contains all the articles that the original site had with some exceptions and can be safely linked to. In addition the site has a vast section that is a reference for all the works that Philip K. Dick wrote called PKDweb or The Encyclopedia Dickiana and contains VALBS which is a reference for secondary materials published about Philip K. Dick. VALBS exist elsewhere on the Internet but this is the official copy of the information.
I would like to add links to each of Philip K. Dick's works with appropriate links from philipkdickfans.com including novel and short story pages. When I have recently made these changes, they were removed. This issue may have been that it appeared I was spamming the site because I was making several edits to several pages in one evening. I believe that the edits I would like to make fall within the External Linking Guidelines that I have read.
Also, one fact to know is that this site was the official Philip K. Dick site until the domain name was taken over by the Estate.  The content here is not only generated by one fan but by scholars who are fans of the writer.
Horselover Fat (talk) 04:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding links to philipkdickfans site
Talk:Enshi City

message: Basic information to add to this article: what it borders. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 23:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Leiyang

message: "As China opens up to outside world, young people go to neighboring Guangdong province to seek fortune, meanwhile, bring lots of new ideas that inpacts old traditions. Nevertheless, Senior farmers in Chenjia Wan, never give way to the new unfavorable lifestyle; No gambling, No smoking, it remains a Xanadu."
Is not suitable for an encyclopedia nor is it neutral.
Wynter myst (talk) 02:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: The article is largely written in Chinglish. The English version should be written in English, ideally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.88.178 (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinglish
Talk:Nannarrup

message: I don't know the order and family. If anyone knows them, please add them to the article. Thanks. Grundle2600 (talk) 03:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Order and family
Talk:Shibli–Umm al-Ghanam

message: In the infobox we read:
:Šibbli - ʔumm ˀel-Rárem (Israeli pronunciation)
:Also spelled 	Shibli-Umm al-Janam (officially)
Both of the above data are entirely counter-intuitive. While, in the first case, the first R of "Rárem" is an expected Hebrew approximation of Arabic غ, the second R is apparently an error, as there is no difficulty in pronouncing ن/נ. I'll correct this now.
The second case is more problematic. Transliterating غ as J appears counter-intuitive, but an editor placed "(officially)" after it, so I'll request a cite for the moment. Thanks for any help. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 23:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox  oddities 

message: The name of this town is Arab al-Shibli. Google books brings back 75 hits for that name in quotes and 1 hit for Shibli Umm al-Ghanem. The page should be moved to the most commonly used name in reliable secondary scholarly sources. Any objections? Tiamuttalk 20:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Kh. Umm el Ghanem (or Ghanam) is in the usual places like SWP.  I don't see Shibli on any maps, though it is mentioned as a tribe. Zerotalk 23:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of town
Talk:Manhattan Chess Club

message: copyedit needed - too many short paragraphs. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 21:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyedit needed  

message: There are two lists of Manhattan CC championships on the Web, both of which we are citing in this article:  one by Wall, one published by Ginsburg.  Ginsburg credits his list to Nick Conticello, former manager of the club, who published the list in the club newsletter in the 1990's; Conticello states that the research was done by Shipman.  Wall says, "Thanks to Frank Brady and Aben Rudy for providing me some of this information", but I am not sure what sources he got his list of championships from.  When he says, "Another source says X" in that list, I think he is referring to Ginsburg/Conticello/Shipman's list.
The championship has usually been covered in reliable sources.  Now that the USCF Digital Archive is online (back issues of Chess Review and Chess Life), I have looked up some of the championships of the 1930's and 1940's, and I have resolved some discrepancies between Wall and Ginsburg, as well as finding some championships on which they are both incorrect.
Chess Review only goes back to 1933.  To go farther back, one would have to look at the American Chess Bulletin, which goes back to 1904, or some other place, since the championship goes back to the 1880's.  In this article we claim that Géza Maróczy won the 1927 championship, and Ginsburg agrees with this, but Wall does not.  It would be good to get a source for that tournament.
Di Felice's books are another possible source.  The chessgames.com entry for Alexander Kevitz cites those books in enumerating the Manhattan CC championships that Kevitz won.  But it too is contradicted by Chess Life and/or Chess Review.  Google Books does not have most of Di Felice's books online, so without my own copies, I can't resolve those questions.
I think that ultimately, we should have our own list, with explicit citations of sources, rather than just quoting Ginsburg's list in full.  Since the list was usually covered by reliable sources, we can consider it notable, which justifies having our own list.  Bruce leverett (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club championships
Talk:Sheikh Danun

message: The "Hadashot Arkheologiyot" can be seriously irritating at times; like here, where they state that the SWP found potsherds from Byzantine and Ottoman periods ...but do not give the source!! Arrgh. ..And it is not in SWP I, p147 (the only SWP-ref. given in Petersen.)...I´ve tried searching, to no avail....Huldra (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the reference is not to SWP but some more recent survey. Zerotalk 13:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SWP 

message: * Census 1931.  For Danun: 39 occupied houses, 155 Muslims; for Dawud: 48 occupied houses, 222 Muslims.  These villages were very close, less than half km.
* 1945 village statistics includes Sheikh Dannun with other locations so no precise statistics
* Grootkerk (16-17) says "French stronghold 1799", so some story is missing.  The name on a French map of the time was Cheik Denou, maybe that helps to search.
Zerotalk 12:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A rough translation would read: "On a rocky hill bordering the plain, ancient locality (333 x 150 ml 45 dunams). Grounds; drifts of stones. Three oil presses. Three cisterns. Tombs carved in rock with loculi, of which tomb decorated with an engraved cross. A tomb preceded by a square courtyard; contains three arcosolia, one in each wall with the excetption of the entrance wall. Grottos." Tiamuttalk 10:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On the Jacotin, 1826, map (Acre; Nazareth, Jordain-section), there is "Cheik Daoud", and, just south of it: "Cheik Denou". Is it possible to get a "cutout" of that map, to add to the article? When I tried to do make a cutout, I  messed up... Cheers, Huldra (talk) 14:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Try :File:AcreNE1799.jpg.  Zerotalk 14:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bits and pieces
Talk:VoiceMode

message: * 
* Bulleted list item
* Bulleted list item
{|
|-
! Header text !! Header text !! Header text !! Header text
|-
| |}
the    are     changed      around      you    sign  it  _______________X  total37
282px|frameless|left|meMeera JasmineInsert non-formatted text hereetings  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.176.229.175 (talk) 02:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  meetings
Category talk:Articles with fictioncruft

message: Fictioncruft appears in all the Family Guy articles, as well as a few other adult cartoons.  It get monotonous trying to gather every cutaway on that show.  I'd hate to cut out the trivia myself and upset other fans.  Some people have too much time on their hands.Sposato (talk) 03:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Andrews County Veterans Memorial

message: My school district is trying to incorporate the use of Wikipedia in the classroom. I am starting this page for a 5th grade classroom. The students will increase their technology skills, along with a better understanding of social studies.This is the first attempt to embed into our curriculum, "Wikipedia". Hopefully it will teach the students about Wikipedia and provide them a real world application for our technolgy course. This should create excitement and enthusiasm in learning about our community and expose them to the one of the technologies they will need in the "Flat World."
:If you return to this article and see this, I wanted to let you know about our project Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Saves Public Art which aims to do precisely what you did with your students and technology class. Our aim is to make our WikiProject Page a resource for students and teachers to easily contribute to and create articles about public art. Please let me know if you're interested. HstryQT (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Head (1994 TV series)

message: As I recall, one of the supporting characters bore a striking resemblance to Beavis from Beavis and Butthead; its been over a decade since I saw it, but I believe it was a doctor or professor --he was substantially older than the high school age Beavis, but there was more than a passing resemblance. --216.9.250.105 (talk) 04:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Beavis resemblance

message: would be a nice addition to an article about a great series...  someone add them, i dont feel like it right now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Proud kraut (talk • contribs) 10:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures 

message: I'm by no means some evil anti-inclusionist (or whatever) who demands a reference for every little thing and deletes all the time, ...but still.  I couldn't find any information about The Head laserdisc with my searches and while I'm sure there is one and feel its mention should remain in the article, I'd like some more information about it, even if it's just a comment ("I once saw one in a store." or something similar) or a link here in the talk page.  Any eBay listings?  Was it a foreign release?  This appears to be an incredibly obscure laserdisc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.82.208 (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: try asking the user who added it in the first place --Compn (talk) 04:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Laserdisc Info Please 

message: Mutualism is a type of symbiotic relationship.  It's not wrong to say symbiotic, merely less specific.  Anyway, I'm changing it.Mentor397 (talk) 19:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutualism 

message: Did the game or comic ever reveal Jim's? ScratchMarshall (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: Just curious as to why MTV'S Oddities redirects to The Head instead of perhaps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTV_Animation
Wouldn't it make more sense to include Oddities as a subsection of that? 2604:3D08:9582:D000:419D:BD82:F4A6:55A4 (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MTV's Oddities
Talk:Rubén Torres Llorca

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. Happy Editing! — 04:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here is the archived discussion from Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding :Category:Cuban contemporary artists ... a bot has already removed the WP:LINKSPAM that was the source of the WP:COPYVIO concern.  —72.75.72.63 (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quazi-quoting from my talk page: COI and other issues aside, the guy seems to be notable. Regardless of how the article got here, it doesn't serve Wikipedia well unless there is a bonified reason to delete the article. A quick googling shows he is known and likely a good article can be made. "It's not like the encyclopedia is over-stuffed with information on Cuban painters." so I would prefer to try to salvage the article rather than delete it for the wrong reasons. If there was a bonified copyvio issue, then yes, it would have to be deleted (hopefully recreated cleanly in userspace first, however) but that doesn't seem to be the issue, or at least claimed. We are on the same side of the issue, we just have different solutions to the same problem. Pharmboy (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at COI/N 

message: Would someone please use  templates for the newspaper references, so that they will display in the standardized format? Thnx! — 00:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has improved a lot since the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubén Torres Llorca nomination ... it remains for Some Other Editor to put some lipstick on this pig. :-) —72.75.72.63 (talk) 13:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 13:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:American Quarter Horse Hall of Fame

message: We do need a source for the 2009 inductees? I'm pretty sure they haven't announced them in the Journal, so something pretty ironclad needs to be sourced for this information. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still not seeing anything in either the Journal or America's Horse that says that 2009 inductees have been announced. If I don't see something that sources this soon, I'm going to have to remove it. Ealdgyth - Talk 02:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 entries

message: I don't know what Mr Conclusion was famous for, but he certainly wasn't a broodmare. Tigerboy1966  08:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's too late to ask how he identifies, so I went ahead and designated "stallion". Atsme📞📧 19:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected it after checking the profile on the AQHHOF website. It looks as though the details were for another horse altogether. btw I don't know if horses resent having gender roles imposed on them but I know that some of them are "gray". Tigerboy1966  20:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 😂 Atsme📞📧 20:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Conclusion
Talk:Time-Based Art Festival

message: If  you have a comment on how to improve style, please make such comments on this talk page. Please don't just slap an unnecessary "clean up" template on article.  The citations are correctly formatted with parenthetical references (Harvard or MLA referencing)--see MLA Style Manual--to proper references.  [Added the style template at top of this talk page.] --NYScholar (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleanup goes beyond the referencing. This article needs a serious copyedit. Templates alert editors the article needs cleanup, nothing more or less. However since you seem to have this article well in hand, I leave you to it and not reapply the template. Note I have also removed the merge proposal. Happy editing. Katr67 (talk) 02:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Style?

message: I disagree with the editor who says this is notable. Maybe to you, but by Wikipedia standards it currently does not demonstrate enough notability. We demonstrate notability through citing information from Wikipedia determined reliable sources, which are mainly newspapers, magazines, books, and journals. Additionally, these must provide significant (i.e. do more than merely mention the subject) coverage and by independent of the subject. Only the first two sources given in this article accomplish this, and were these featured articles in a national publication then this would be enough. The third source is trivial coverage of this subject and the final source has PICA as a client, thus not independent. So only two RS in regional media are not quite enough. I would suggest combing through more of The Oregonian or NW art magazines (or national art journals) to better demonstrate the notability and prevent it from being deleted. Aboutmovies (talk) 00:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Coimbatore North Junction railway station

message: I removed the prod because railway stations are generally notable. --Eastmain (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Railway stations are usually notable

message: What could be done for editing this page. What all informations needed? Please tel me.Chidambaram mech04 (talk) 08:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Could be done? 

message: This railway station article is a candidate for redirect to and merger with its parent railway system. It has insufficient verifiable material to be considered a comprehensive article on a notable topic.  Please see current RfC at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains#RfC India railway stations. Rhadow (talk) 20:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Coimbatore North is not a junction railway station. So, it is to be renamed as Coimbatore North railway station. Almightybless (talk) 15:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title renaming
Talk:Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions

message: This page of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_prophets_of_Abrahamic_religions have incorrectly shown entry of Ahmadya/Qadyani false leaders and others self claimed, as a prophets of Abrahamic Religion, where fact is after Islam's last prophet which is Prophet Muhammad pbuh there should be no entry hence it is requested to please remove every entry placed after this. 119.153.53.34 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "where fact is" There is nothing factual about religious beliefs, just different religious views. Dimadick (talk) 19:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a fact that most Muslims consider Mohammed the "seal of the prophets' and the very last one.-2A00:23EE:1018:AD0C:D5B6:2AED:F036:91A6 (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under Islam Section, Last Prophet Is Muhammad pbuh, please remove others 

message: As a derivative of Islam, shouldn't the Sikhs be here too? -2A00:23EE:1018:AD0C:D5B6:2AED:F036:91A6 (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sikhs aren't derivatives of Islam Ameerthewolf (talk to me  18:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sikhs

message: I think this article is defunct anyway La'ayiv (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Give Mormonism their own collumn? (Also, Ishmael is portrayed in a negative sense in Christianity and at least some Jewish traditions, not exactly a prophet) 

message: I think the Ahmadiyya should have their own column because they are not Muslims. They also have lots of prophets that are not in Islam. If the Bahai'is and the Druze have their separate columns, the Ahmadiyya should too. Ameerthewolf (talk) 18:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't Ahmadiyya have their own collumn?
Talk:Copiapó River

message: Where does the name Copiapó come from?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.15.154.13 (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?
Talk:Navarre Beach, Florida

message: Hurricanes Katrina & Gustav also affected the area.  I added them to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.207.209.16 (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurricanes

message: Wishing I knew a little bit more about healthcare reform!
Where's the Humana South when u need it? Isn't that military/Gov Insurance??
Signed,
Lost InTranslation Nola44 (talk) 05:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Me Lord?! 

message: I have undone the merge of Navarre Beach with Navarre, Florida. The practice in Wikipedia is to have a separate article for each census-designated place in the U.S. In this case, while Navarre Beach shares a ZIP Code with Navarre, the U.S. Census Bureau maintains a complete set of population and demographic statistics that are separate from the statistics for Navarre, indicating that planners and others in the region see at as a community with enough distinct characteristics as to let it stand alone. While it is perfectly fine to claim that Navarre Beach is a neighborhood of Navarre, it's actually a moot point since neither community is incorporated. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census-designated place 

message: So looking back, I'm seeing that the discussion confirming merging this page with the Navarre, Florida page was skewed because of some sockpuppet activity [for full transparency, this was a terrible mistake on my part when I was 15 (this was 6 years ago) and did not realize the seriousness behind sockpuppeting, I went through the investigation and reinstatement process to be allowed to edit again and, of course, haven't done any such thing again]. I still would very much support keeping the articles merged, and there wasn't any dissent from anybody whatsoever when the merge was being discussed. However, considering the facts as they are, if there is any wish to create a new discussion, I would understand. Looking forward to hearing y'all's thoughts! - Navarre0107 (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmerge?
Talk:Chet Zar

message: According to Zar, as detailed in his interview found here:
*Typically he does not have a clear image of what he wants to paint when he begins.
*Most often, he either has no idea at all what he is going to do, or he has a "vague concept".
*According to him, his best work is done when he "has the freedom to allow the painting to develop", that is "where my strength lies, to be able to go with the flow and to recognize and build upon the happy accidents". This is a fun way to paint for him. For him, "the creative process is where I find my paintings".
:Lara❤Love 04:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Info to work in

message: Anybody else think that this guy is a complete legend!!!
-Peace Out!-
mÆniac Ask! 22:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: yes! i was gifted A HUGE lithograph a few years back and its my all time most prized possession, in more way than one, i am obsessed 208.84.222.113 (talk) 03:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool Stuff 
Talk:Beautiful firetail

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Beautiful Firetail couple.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 25, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-10-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:24, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Beautiful Firetail couple.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon