Talk:100-Hour Plan

message: How many days is this likely to last? Assuming a 10 hour working day that would be 10 days or until the 17th 22nd assuming a 5 day working week but I have no idea if either of these assumptions are likelyt to be correct Nil Einne 15:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long 

message: Does the US really subsidise oil companies? Or does this refer to subsidies supposedly for renewable energy and the likely that oil companies are taking advantage of? Nil Einne 15:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tax subsidies? 

message: i am surprised someone tried to nominate this for deletion. an obvious since of politcal ignorance jk jk71.62.10.130 04:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  surprised 

message: Behun, I've taken great care to address your concerns. The sourcing in the Washington Post is as solid as depleted uranium. Take care to read both pages of the article. Jane Harman isn't mentioned until the second page. I do not say that she served as chair. I only said that she was blocked from serving as chair, which is completely, 100% accurate. Dino 03:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are we using an article from 11/30/2006 that dates to a time PRIOR to Pelosi being sworn in and the start of the "100 Hour Clock" to report on what happened AFTER?  Yes, the Washington Post is a reputable source, but it cannot predict the future.  It's a bit like saying that Wikipedia should state that Thomas E. Dewey was the 34th President because it says right there in the Chicago Tribune: "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN".
The 9/11 Commission recommended (on p420) that Congress either have ONE joint committee with responsibility for intelligence oversight or TWO (one in each house) "combining authorizing and appropriating authorities".  To the best of my knowledge, the House Select Committee on Intelligence (http://intelligence.house.gov/) now has that power.  It also recommends that each house have a permanent Committee on Homeland Security (http://homeland.house.gov/), which was done in the House in January 2005.  It could be argued that Pelosi and her team cannot take credit for this, but I don't think they have tried to.  The purpose of HR 1 was to implement the unimplemented Commission recommendations. Flycandler 15:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's talk about this 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://democraticleader.house.gov/docUploads/100hourscalendar.pdf
** In 100-Hour Plan on 2011-05-23 01:56:23, 404 Not Found
** In 100-Hour Plan on 2011-05-31 21:09:00, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 100-Hour Plan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514000840/http://www.giftlegacy.uci.edu/giftlaw/washington.jsp?WebID=GL2006-1021&D=200644 to http://www.giftlegacy.uci.edu/giftlaw/washington.jsp?WebID=GL2006-1021&D=200644
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106041142/http://democraticleader.house.gov/docUploads/100hourscalendar.pdf to http://democraticleader.house.gov/docUploads/100hourscalendar.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110222349/http://speaker.house.gov/legislation/clock to http://speaker.house.gov/legislation/clock
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified