Talk:Naruto Uzumaki/Archive 1

message: If the bonds that Naruto makes with Team 7 are, as it says, "eternal", then how can they be "unfortunately shattered"?
:Needs expansion, especially for the Chuunin Exam arc, as well as generally on the whole article. Clean-up is needed was well, especially for grammar and overall editions. -- Hobbeslover 00:31, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonds 

message: === Kyūbi Naruto ===	
:Image:Kyuubi-Naruto4attack.png - Naruto in his four-tailed Kyūbi-transformation (downsized from article).
Throughout the series, Naruto has (unintentionally) loosened the seal that binds the Kyūbi inside him.
The Kyūbi, is a malevolent being, ("Like staring into the face of evil itself" as described by Haku), and wishes nothing more than to escape Naruto. But if it ever wishes to escape, Naruto must become critically enraged. Until then, for it's own sake, it assists Naruto in any way possible (an act of both greed and blackmail victism). During Kyūbi Naruto (0 tails) Naruto has enhanced speed and strength, sharp talons and fangs, and an extremely werewolf like face. During Kyūbi Naruto (1 tail) Naruto looks like the 0-tails, except he is surrouneded by a blood-red, flame-like, fox-shaped aura. His three-tailed powers have yet to be discovered. In his fourth state, he is unable to distinguish friend from foe. Also, he can create a black ball of both the Kyūbi's chakra and his blood, which (when eaten) can create a blast from the mouth strong enough to destroy even the Rashomon gates. He can also releases shockwaves from his fists. It can be safely assumed that the Nine-Tailed state does not exist, but is in fact the point when the Kyūbi can escape. Kyūbi Naruto in it's two, four, five, six, seven, and eight-tailed states have yet to be seen.
The above addition isn't very well written, but I'm hesitant to remove the section, especially now that the bijū are more or less the focus of the series. Any opinions? --Pentasyllabic 04:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so I let you know, I've removed it from the article until there is a concensus to keep it, and/or until it has been rewritten, as it lowers the quality of the article too much to let it stay, until further notice. But, if I can suggest that we make it a subsection of the Kyūbi part of the Biju-article rathre than here, as it consists of info that is more relevant to info about the Kyūbi, more than Naruto, even though it contains info that is relevant to both. Satanael 12:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the above inline image to a link--fair use images usually should not be displayed on talk pages. ~MDD4696 04:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyūbi Naruto section 

message: :Image:Kyuubi-Naruto4attack.png - Naruto in his four-tailed Kyūbi-transformation (downsized from article).
Throughout the series, Naruto has (unintentionally) loosened the seal that binds the Kyūbi inside him.
The Kyūbi, is a malevolent being, ("Like staring into the face of evil itself" as described by Haku), and wishes nothing more than to escape Naruto. But if it ever wishes to escape, Naruto must become critically enraged. Until then, for it's own sake, it assists Naruto in any way possible (an act of both greed and blackmail victism). During Kyūbi Naruto (0 tails) Naruto has enhanced speed and strength, sharp talons and fangs, and an extremely werewolf like face. During Kyūbi Naruto (1 tail) Naruto looks like the 0-tails, except he is surrouneded by a blood-red, flame-like, fox-shaped aura. His three-tailed powers have yet to be discovered. In his fourth state, he is unable to distinguish friend from foe. Also, he can create a black ball of both the Kyūbi's chakra and his blood, which (when eaten) can create a blast from the mouth strong enough to destroy even the Rashomon gates. He can also releases shockwaves from his fists. It can be safely assumed that the Nine-Tailed state does not exist, but is in fact the point when the Kyūbi can escape. Kyūbi Naruto in it's two, four, five, six, seven, and eight-tailed states have yet to be seen.
The above addition isn't very well written, but I'm hesitant to remove the section, especially now that the bijū are more or less the focus of the series. Any opinions? --Pentasyllabic 04:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so I let you know, I've removed it from the article until there is a concensus to keep it, and/or until it has been rewritten, as it lowers the quality of the article too much to let it stay, until further notice. But, if I can suggest that we make it a subsection of the Kyūbi part of the Biju-article rathre than here, as it consists of info that is more relevant to info about the Kyūbi, more than Naruto, even though it contains info that is relevant to both. Satanael 12:29, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the above inline image to a link--fair use images usually should not be displayed on talk pages. ~MDD4696 04:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyūbi Naruto 

message: whats up with this canon I mean does it really matter if anime has saying its not canon is like taking out Mashi kishimotos work it aint my fault you guys dont have cable or you do its all canon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by tariq12 (talk • contribs)  01:18, April 2, 2006 (UTC).
:It's just 'cause of stuff not being in manga, which is the thing that always comes out first, and is the original source material that most everything in the anime is supposed to be completely, or almost completely, based off of, which, the filler arcs aren't, therefor people assume it's not canon. I agree with you. Everything, manga, manga-based anime, and filler, I see as canon because Kishimoto Authored it. But, putting that aside, that's why. The Wretched 01:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, no. Kishimoto does NOT write the filler arcs in the anime AT ALL. Observation 18:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canon crap 

message: Does that section need to be there?  It's speculation and opinion, and I'd contest that the majority of Naruto fans think that they're in love.  At most, I think it deserves a trivia bullet, and even then in a more objective manner.  The section isn't there since I made a revert, but should it have been there in the first place? SpionKop 05:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That section probably shouldn't have been there, I agree. A lot of what people see is simply a misperception of various cultural norms which don't apply in North America. 171.72.5.226 16:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Because Wikipedia is not a place to discuss fan pairings. Unless the pairing is canonical, having a portion of an article about it it would just constitue original research, which is looked down on at Wikipedia. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 00:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NeoChaosX hit the nail on the head.  Speculation about fan-favorite pairings will always be OR.  It has no place here. Danny Lilithborne 00:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That article I mentioned, however, wasn't stating "Sasuke and Naruto SHOULD be together because... blahblahblah".  It stated how it was one of the largest fan communities within the Naruto fandom.  That article wasn't speculating at all but stating facts.  It still should not have been taken down.--Kakexorxdeath 05:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But then, what help would it offer people who read Wikipedia? There is no real relation to the plot. You can say that they have a strong bond (in a brotherly sense, in my opinion), because I'm sure that will be important. I don't think people need to know what pairing has the largest fanbase. It doesn't help anything in any way. Sumhtun 06:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has a section relating the actual relationship between the two. The longings of a group of fans are not notable enough to add. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 06:15, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SasuNaru 

message: Is there any proof of Naruto's "compatability" with the other genin teams? Is it really necessary to include this info? I was considering removing it, but I felt that I should ask here first. --GhostStalker 11:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filler Arcs 

message: Uzumaki Naruto should be moved to Naruto Uzumaki per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Names of fictional characters.  --Geopgeop 12:54, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why, exacly? If I'm not mistaken, the English manga uses the Japanese name-order, not the Western one. ～卍 JadziaLover 会話~投稿 卐～ 13:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in that case; if Jadzia is right, this should not be moved. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 10:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: so you can find it easier i guess.--fourth 12:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I openly admit that I still have a VERY long way to go on my Japanese skills and that my knowledge of Naruto is somewhat lacking, since I've never read the manga and have only recently started to watch the anime. But here's the thing. As far as I have been able to understand, Naruto's name is supposed to be written うずまきナルト (Uzumaki Naruto), meaning Uzumaki in hiragana and Naruto in Katakana. But when he signs the scroll for summoning frogs (episode 54, I think, somewhere near the end), you can clearly see he writes a "to" in hiragana (though with a spiral). So how are you supposed to spell Naruto? Using hiragana or Katakana? Hecko 20:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Naruto is written in Katakana. The scene you described is the only one where Naruto was ever written in Hiragana. I have no idea why he wrote it in Hiragana, though... maybe because Hiragana is easier to write in blood then Katakana, or something... ～卍 JadziaLover 会話~投稿 卐～ 21:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a shot in the dark, but I'm guessing he uses katakana for informal situations, but since he was basically writing his signature (wouldn't want the toads to contest the validity of the contract based on the alphabet, after all), he used hiragana. SpionKop 04:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto in Hiragana or Katakana? 

message: This article is already 76kb large. The size seems excessive for an anime character when there are articles on countries and so on that have been chided as being large at 49kb. Do we have to detail every single incident of the Naruto plotline? Perhaps it would be better to split that out in a separate article titled "Plot of Naruto" instead of reiterating such points for each Naruto character. yueni 16:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well this is the plot as it concerns Naruto, the character. He just happens to be the main character, so most of the action revolves around him. --GhostStalker 20:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I definitely understand that. What I'm suggesting is that we pare the plot discussion down significantly, just hit the highlights of it in this article, and then move a more detailed discussion of it to a separate article. In reading all the other Naruto main character articles, there are a lot of similarities (i.e. with Sakura, Sasuke etc.), which is only natural as they experienced a lot of the same events together. This way, we'll have a shorter character article, and a main article with plotline discussions. -- yueni 22:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Size 

message: Naruto is listed under orphan several times, but I disagree with this. While he most certainly has no parents present, and it is clearly said he has no parents, that's not the same as having DEAD parents. That has never really been alluded to at all. It wasn't said if they were killed by the Fox, if they were Konoha ninja at all, if they fled, whatever. I know many surmise that the Fourth was his dad, but even that doesn't explain who the mother might be. I'd like to remove it and all references to it, if possible. Tyciol 11:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan dispute 

message: I've noticed an abundance of personal words, such as 'we', in the trivia section. Aren't personal words frowned upon in an encyclopedic article? I know they are in Science Hypotheses. It just seems a bit awkward. -- The Wretched
:your right it shouldn't b there icnore it or change it is my suggestion.--Geterdone 14:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Words 

message: Since Naruto is still a Genin in Part II, he may take the next Chūnin Exam. Could this be speculated on somewhere? The Wretched 03:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Speculation is bad, unless there are decent hints that it will actually happen. Case in point, every single speculated biju host. All the speculation is nonsense, since it's fairly clear that they've all been caught. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 03:49, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Chūnin Exam

message: I'm not sure if I heard it correct or I just misinterpreted what Jiraiya said on Ep# 056 that the reason why Naruto cannot use much of his own chakra (during his training to master Kuchiyose no Jutsu) is because his own body is using much of it to contain or restrain the Kyubi within Naruto. Do you guys have any idea about this? Does this mean that if <in case> the Kyubi is extracted from Naruto, he will then be able to show his real power? There is also something I read on the Naruto part 2 section of this article where Yamato tells Naruto (after accidentally using his four-tailed Kyubi transformation) that using the Kyubi's power may greatly assist them on their quest to rescue Sasuke, he is not using his own power in doing so and his own chakra is his true strength. Any comments or opinions? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.14.194.26 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 5 July 2006  (UTC)
:#you heard correctly
:#please sign your comments
:--Geterdone 18:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So you think he'll be able to fight Orochimaru and Sasuke without the Kyubi's help? --Beef noodles 21:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. Wait and see. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with some guy 0830 just wait but personally i think yes.--71.199.154.43 14:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have great confidence in the little dude, but I also think that that would take a miracle (which I don't think really exists because 1. I'm agnostic and 2. Little in Naruto happens by chance). Unless you don't mean fighting them both at the same time and I'm just misinterpreting your statement. The Wretched 02:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course I didn't mean fighting them at the same time, that would make Sasuke and Orochimaru look weak if they both take on Naruto at once. --Beef noodles 20:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Repressing is not sealing. He only pushed it back in. There's nothing keeping it from getting out once more, thus Yamato's assistance. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto's Chakra 

message: Um...yeah, good info, but...I really don't think this section is a good idea. He developed way more than just 4, and even if someone added more, it would make it too long, and everyone would start bitching about it, and yeah. So...what do we do? The Wretched 02:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are the important ones. There aren't any others worth mentioning. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationships

message: In the article, it states that the more tails Naruto's chakra have, the more the Kyūbi's personality and chakra leaks out. It makes sense in some ways, but when Naruto fought with Hyūga Neji during the Chūnin Exam part three, he extracted Chakra with nine tails, yet it is much weaker than during even his one-tail transformation when fighting Uchiha Sasuke. Any suggestions why this ocurred?
:That's just the chakra taking a shape to resemble the Kyuubi as it did in the fight with Haku. It's different than the tail levels. Nemu 18:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tail levels are determined by a much thicker shield of chakra, like that pic in Plot of Naruto. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyūbi's Chakra 

message: Why have the Chakra types been removed from each characters profile box? They are a new and distinctive characteristic in the Naruto world and worth note. None of the ones I saw were even speculative, only the affinities that have been officialy reveled were shown. If I dont have an answer in 8 hours or so I'm reverting the page.--Master Shan 10:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they are mostly speculative. For instance, how on earth do you know what chakra type Shikamaru, Shino, or Kankuro uses? Please do not revert the page. Geg or SG will just change it back to the way it's suppose to be.--67.80.145.64 19:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, don't revert the page. If a certain character uses an elemental type of jutsu, that wouldn't necessarily mean he or she has that type of chakra. Take for example, Kakashi, he has used (from what I recall) 3 types of elemental jutsu (earth, water and lightning) and according to Kakashi, there are five basic types of chakra — Fire, Wind, Water, Lightning and Earth, Each person’s chakra tends to be one of these types. Given that Kakashi has used multiple elemental type jutsu, he would only have one type of chakra. --64.14.194.26 03:03, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But only the Chakra types specificaly attributed to characters in the latest chapter were list, none were speculated. Kakashi said himself he was an electric type. It's confirmed information not speculation, Naruto was listed as Wind because he was PROVEN to be such with the card...no ones assuming Temari is Wind also just because of her techniques. So where does speculation play in?--Master Shan 05:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does no good if only two or three characters have a value for the field. On top of that, chakra types don't make much of a difference in skill. Kakashi is mainly a water-jutsu user, yet has lightning-based chakra. If and when some databook defines every character's chakra type, then we'll bother listing it. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 06:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, if this were the case they wouldnt have been concieved in the first place...but I will respect the majority. Just watch for this to be fleshed out more in recent chapters though, I gurantee it.--Master Shan 20:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If and when it becomes a major issue, we'll readd it. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:38, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chakra Types 

message: Naruto in chapter 316 asked about the nature of others Justu and how Kakashi says that every jonin Have over two nature chakras And I wanna know69.211.223.220 05:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: O...k... Now try again, only this time make it so we can understand what you're trying to say. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

text: What is it that you want to know? Blademaster313 23:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto's questions 

message: There was someone that added this to the trivia section? Why would anybody want to know about this?
:Strange as it may be, it is a recurring theme and relevant to the character. Personally, I think they could have done without it. It's not that I mind, but they've gone overboard at least once. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs)
::This page is starting to turn more into a fan page than a wiki page... Anyway, there were only 2 episodes where Naruto did have bowel problems, the episode where Sasuke and Sakura were introduced, and during the bikochu mission. Should that be considered recurring already?
Let me continue your reasoning there.
* Episode 3
* Chunin exam, forest of death
* Bikochu arc, twice I might add
* Episode 192
It's obviously recurring, no matter how disgusting it may be. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto's bowel problems? 

message: I added a whole new section on Naruto's transformations, if there is another one he's done and you want to add it, feel free, although it is getting long, remember to add a picture and relevant data as to the circumstances surrounding the transformation and how many tails it had. Also use the "*" bullet command to make it fit in. Please do not revert this section or vandalize it, as it is a valid section that took some work and gives important information on when and what he transforms into during the series, and clarifies his states of Kyuubi-ness.
--.:Debil:. 09:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This transformation section is NOT redundant, because the above paragraph is only talking about Naruto's relationship with the Kyuubi, not the ways in which he transforms. Someguy0830, your edit breaks up the flow of the article by putting a picture on the left side and squishing the text into the middle. This is stupid and I think you need to go read up on where to place pictures in an article. I'm reverting it back and I'd appriciate if you would put something in talk if you want It changed instead of blithely reverting everything. The transformation section contains a lot of information that previous edits do not have. --.:Debil:. 00:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't. You mention the nine-tailed transformation, yet that was in no way a Kyubi-based transformation. Gamabunta provided the chakra for a combo henge. That's it. Furthermore, you only copied the info for the four-tailed state. You also skipped the two and three tailed states. It's redundant because you say nothing more than what has already been said. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the two tailed state and am researching the three tailed state as we speak. And for the last effing time, please stop squishing the text in between two pictures, it's stupid and i'm tired of this edit war. --.:Debil:. 03:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The section isn't needed. The one, two, and three tailed states are basically the same besides the power and number of tails. They are explained enough already. Nemu 03:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? None of the states are even mentioned except the four tailed state without my edit. A picture is shown, but that breaks the flow of the article and shouldn't be there unless it's mentioned in the article. I've spent a lot of time making this section and I just read that part of the manga(Chapter 227 is where naruto turns into his two tailed form). So it's not innacurate and you guys are deleting my section for no reason. --.:Debil:. 03:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Every state is mentioned now. You have no more reason to add your section. And again, your section is redundant because there is little difference between his forms. Also, the images can be left-aligned. You don't complain about the infobox, do you? No, so don't complain about an image. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 03:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 02:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section. 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose, This has been talked about before, and the English Manga uses the Japanese name order, so it should not be moved. Also Uchiha Sasuke, Haruno Sakura, Yamanaka Ino, and many more characters are re-ordered in the dub of the Anime, yet all these are found on Wikipedia as above. --.:Debil:. 00:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Son Goku is a pre-meiji literary figure. --Kunzite 23:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sun Wukong is the pre-meiji literary figure (but it doesn't matter because he is not Japanese; Japanese rules don't apply.).  Son Goku is not, even though he is heavily influenced by Sun Wukong.  --ColourBurst 01:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm.. They're two names describing the same literary character:孫悟空（そんごくう、Sūn Wùkōng）.  I'm not talking about DBZ or contemporary portrayals (though Mayumi Tanaka plays an excellent Son Goku.) I'm talking about 西遊記 written in China in the 1590's (and if my skimming of the ja article is correct, introduced into Japan in 1694.) --Kunzite 02:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I _was_ talking about Son Goku in the dragonball anime, which is a derivative character not pre-Meiji (you can't say the Son Goku in Dragonball is the same as Sun Wukong).  I however also think that Son Goku should be merged into Sun Wukong because the Japanese and Chinese versions of the character are the same, and this is just redundant information.  However that is here nor there.  --ColourBurst 02:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, I think the keywords are "fictional world inspired by"  ... I believe the anime is in western order.  --Kunzite 23:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The names should all be converted to the style dicatated at WP:MOS-JA  i.e. give the popular romanization as the introductory name and include the macronized version name in the parens. I'll go start move requests for those articles.  And why not post those rebuttals here? This is a debate, afterall. --Kunzite 23:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ...can we modify this nomination so that the articles with macrons move to titles without macrons? Can we do it four days into the nom? --NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 19:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's seems a minor point, so I doubt anyone would contest it. Furthermore, it would fit with other Japanese articles. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 02:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've modified all but one of them. The only question is "Choji"....how exactly should it be spelled? I've seen "Chouji" used, but I'm not certain it's the proper Romanization. --NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 02:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Choji, as spelled in Naruto's description of the Rookie Nine in that one episode. I altered it. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 02:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I just put up some jutsu for naruto uzumaki that he has been stated and it got deleted. do you know why that happened? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kingdom hearts lll (talk • contribs) .
:Because Naruto's never used any of the jutsu you listed? The Jutsu list for individual character articles are meant to list what jutsu a character's used, not every move that's been mentioned in the series. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, the assertion that "It is stated that naruto can use any jutsu including kekkai genkai while using the nine taied foxes chakra." is utter and complete nonsense. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Kingdom hearts lll, please stop adding nonsense to the article. --Pentasyllabic 13:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed a bunch of Jutsu... Sorry, even if it's been stated Naruto can use ANY jutsu while sporting all nine tails, the point is moot: It's also been stated that just the four tails is enough to seriously weaken Naruto's body the same way Tsunade's Genesis Rebirth harms hers. Nine tails would no doubt KILL Naruto. List that fact with the Trivia with a proper source, perhaps. Lankybugger 16:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jutsu

message: does any body think we should add stats to the characters,like strength chakra speed on a radar chart.
:Nope. That would be wandering too much into fancruft. Let's keep that stuff on the fansites. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 17:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: stats will only lead to arguements and uncivil conversations.--Kenshin -Himura 21:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  stats 

message: Should the trivia sections in the Naruto articles be removed and have the information moved somewhere else in the article? It seems that they are looked down upon. Nemu 01:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're looked down upon just about everywhere, but I think it's better that they're restricted to the character pages. Could probably be trimmed down to "Notes". – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia sections

message: Yeah, is Naruto's rank correct? It says he is still a Genin. And if he is, could someone please explain why to me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.243.49.222 (talk • contribs) .
:He's hasn't had a chance to retake the exams yet. Nemu 13:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although Naruto is a Ninja capable of fighting on-par with most Jounin and some S-Rank, he hasn't yet actually passed the offical examinations to be a Chuunin or a Jounin. So, on paper he's a Genin but he's capable of fighting on a level much beyond that. 151.151.73.169 13:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naruto's Rank