lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Autorack

message: Autorack articles has been consolidated from auto carrier under this heading, and internal links in a number of related articles have been updated. Vaoverland 04:52, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: These vehicles look very similar to a British Rail wagon called a Cartic 4, which was an articulated double decker.  Unfortunately, I don't know when they were introduced, but surely it's worth mentioning the name.--86.164.168.185 (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartic 

message: The description of the picture was correct (re: 25Mar 2011 edit). The platform consists of the yellow bar and everything below it (the wheels, axles, bogies, and all the bits to keep it on the tracks), while the racks themselves are the red/silver parts which sit upon the platform. This allows, as in this picture, a rack owned by one company to ride on a platform owned by another. Prompt Critical (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform vs Rack 

message: The Following External links are dead (either 404 or no longer hosted):
*"The Evolution of Automobile Traffic" — 2003 article from The National Railway Bulletin 68 (1).
*"Johnstown America delivers first aluminum auto carriers to First Union Rail" — August 3, 2004 online article from Trains Magazine.
*Anton Anderson Memorial Tunnel — "North America's Longest Railway-Highway Tunnel."
*Guide to Railcars
As I do not make changes, just notice errors during my casual perusals, anyone care to clean them up?
Collision-Shift (talk) 03:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Links 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... inadvertently selected CSD, there is a copyvio concern here but not to the level of CSD, please ignore --MadeYourReadThis (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is the copyright violation?  The article text here is way longer than the article at the link you cited.  If you look at the history for this article, I created it in 2004, nine years before the date shown on the link you cited.  I was not able to find any sentences that were duplicated on both as they stand right now. Slambo (Speak) 11:07, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

text: Okay, I see one paragraph in the Vert-A-Pac section that uses the same text.  When was it added?  According to this diff, it was in the Wikipedia article by 2010, still three years before the Railway Age article.  Therefore, Railway Age copied text from Wikipedia, not the other way around. Slambo (Speak) 11:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

text: The full report on this issue also shows the duplicated text in at most one paragraph and one additional phrase.  Blanking the page is excessive in this case regardless of which article came first. Slambo (Speak) 11:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the copyvio tag per above.--agr (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Lexicographic error

message: I don't think hink is "clearly an error for think", as that would give the definition "If you think, you think hopefully and unrealistically about something." This doesn't seem to make sense to me. I suggest we remove the statement "which is clearly an error for think" (which is a subjective statement in any case). Sverre 16:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hink 

message: I know some dictionaries introduce intentional errors as a copyright protection scheme. New Scientist has had some articles on this the last year. I suggest adding a paragraph on this practice. Sverre 17:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC
I have heard that story but is it true? It would be good to see some examples.S. Valkemirer (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intentional errors 

message: In the article on "Ghost words" I suggested that ghost meanings be mentioned too. It's hard to tell whether that subject belongs there or here. Please see my remarks at that article and decide.S. Valkemirer (talk) 19:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speak of ghost meanings too
Talk:Crossfire (American TV program)

message: The sentence "Both were Democrats" after Geraldine Ferraro & Bill Press were mentioned as taking over the chair on the "left" seems out of place here.  Unless we are going to start plugging in party affiliations next to everyone mentioned in the article (a redundant act if ever there was one) I'm going to pull the sentence (which is a hanging one anyway).
24.115.50.83 14:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferraro & Press  

message: While the Jon Stewart appearance is certainly a turning point in Crossfire's history, this section seems now to include virtually every remark made by Stewart on the show. We do have links to the video and transcript of the appearance and this section now seems too long and not encyclopaedic. It should be possible to cut this section back, and paraphrase his remarks, and the responses of the hosts. I'll have a go but I'll wait first to see if there are good arguments against a careful trimming of this section. Dean B (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stewart section
Talk:Kasimov

message: Also please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) --Gene s 15:17, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use English 

message: or naming convention for Tatar.
*If name of concret person has English equivalent, usage of English name has priority. Needs experiment with Google.
: Sounds good.
for titles
*If name uses in Tatar texts only and first used in English text, name will be used in Tatar form, but converting extra signs:
*ä - a
*ö - o
*ü - u
*ı - e
*í - i
*ç - ch
*ş - sh
*ğ - gh
*ñ - ng
: Looks fine.
for text
*Tatar words are wroten as in Tatar, but always with transliteration for English speakers /in brackets/ after the word
: If indeed there is a need for Tatar word in the text at all. Tatar words should be used when there is no English equivalent, when the word cannot or should not be translated like for naming people and places. In the same way it's currently done in the articles about China or Russia. 
It's okay?
--Untifler 15:27, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, looks good. --Gene s 11:53, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comfortable using of Tatar names. 

message: Hi - I have just completed the Sicilian translation, but I came across some constructions which were a little bit puzzling for me - as follows:
* The first population of this area was Finnic tribe Meschiora - the Finnic tribe, the Meschiora?
**Meschiora is name of concrete tribe of Finnic people. --.:Ajvol:. 08:40, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: On maps it looks like it lies on the left bank. And so is also stated in Russian language.--194.165.127.158 22:13, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Fixed in English version. The town is situated on the left bank of Oka river. See  http://www.kasimov.ru/shema.php --.:Ajvol:. 12:12, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  On which bank of the river Oka
Talk:Déjà Vu (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young album)

message: Given the title of the album is rendered in the cover art as Déjà vu and the convention of the French language doesn’t have ’title case’ the same way as in English where each word in titles have initial capitalization, should it be changed from Déjà Vu?
Clearly a small matter. I.A.M. (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Title 

message: Was the Neil Young song Ohio included on the Australian LP ? Doug butler (talk) 12:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian release 

message: ". . .SD-19188 and the cover was changed from black to brown in some foreign releases." I have a first issue album and the cover color is what I would call 'chocolate' brown - not black and definitely not the color of the photo in the infobox. Were some first edition covers truly black? If not, perhaps the section needs to be edited to state that such is the case. Thanks! THX1136 (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover color of original & re-release?
Talk:Sticks and Stones (New Found Glory album)

message: Shouldn't this be moved to something like Sticks and Stones (album) and Sticks and Stones (disambiguation) just be changed to Sticks and Stones? Seems like thats how its usually done here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Audiori (talk • contribs) 00:31, 24 March 2006
:No, because New Found Glory's Sticks and Stones album is most famous so there is no reason to link to take it to a disambiguation page. The link at the top of the page is suitable. Sharpdust 01:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to who? How do you judge what is most famous? I've never even heard of it myself. The reason I raise the question is that I've had pages that I've created or worked on moved to a disambiguation page even when no other article existed with that name - and probably won't. So, if fame is the deciding factor - what standard is used to determine "the most famous," and is that standard used all of the time? If so, why isn't used on some of the articles that I've worked on? Audiori 07:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:130 departments of the First French Empire

message: According to :de:Ruhrdepartement the grand duchy Berg was split into 4 departements when it was annexed by Napoleon - Rhine, Sieg, Ems and Ruhr. But I cannot find those in the list, the Roer probably refers to the Rur (German spelling, what is the English one?) more to the west. andy 23:35, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The Grand-duchy Berg was not part of the French Empire itself, but of the Confederation of the Rhine, which was a French protectorate. That's why it's not in this list, this is the French Empire proper (even though it includes many lands that aren't in present France). Maybe the "Ems" departement you mention is the same as Ems-Supérieur. Markussep 11:41, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Very useful article, THANK YOU !--So6sechs (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Aerosmith (album)

message: One thing about this album that gets to me is how different his voice sounds from every album since.  Maybe a change in producers and their input may have to do with, or drinking.  Who knows?!  Nothing mentioned in the book.  His voice might sound a little more different now that's he gonna be sixty!  It's hard to believe it's been thirty-five years since this came out!Sposato (talk) 23:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steven Tyler's voice 

message: Who would’ve thought Aerosmith and Bruce Springsteen would release their debut albums on the same day? Both from the east coast, both trying to emulate the Beatles, the Stones and all the other rock giants that came before them, going on to produce some of the best rock music ever written. It’s almost a sort of mythological good vs. evil, or some other analogy. One may be called “America’s Greatest Rock band,” or whatever, but the other shows how much he actually loves America with his music. Wiscipidier (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerosmith and (/vs.) The Boss
Talk:O, Yeah! Ultimate Aerosmith Hits

message: Thanks to the author(s) that included the fact that this has been reissued under another title. I really hate when bands and/or their reps (looking at you KISS) do this type of thing to rip off fans & collectors. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you!
Talk:Devil Without a Cause

message: This album was not Kid Rock's major album debut. that was with jive in like 1993. this was his second chance. i have changed that line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.94.212 (talk • contribs) 
Grits was never released by Jive they let the album sit after the Vanilla Ice fiasco.So Devil was his major label debut.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.9.37.113 (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *That is not true. Numerous sources indicate that Grits Sandwiches for Breakfast was his major label debut, abd that it was released. It is on iTunes. You are wrong. TheRealBoognish (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major album debut 

message: It also says that "Devil Without a Cause is currently one of the two records with a parental advisory label to be certified Diamond, the other being Outkast's Speakerboxxx/The Love Below" which without even doing any research I can tell you is wrong, because Eminem's "Marshall Mathers LP" was Diamond as of about 4 years ago, and I think it's safe to assume that this album comes with a  parental advisory label as well. I didn't make any changes because I don't have an account, I'm lazy, and I'm really high, but even I know this, if you don't believe me look it up. Plus I'm sure that there are many other albums that have gone Diamond that have these stickers (biggie,2pac?).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.248.52 (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Certification

message: Regarding the inclusion of nu metal, this profile on the era states:
:Devil Without A Cause, Kid Rock’s breakthrough album, and one that, while not nü-metal, extended the lineage of rap-rock
So this album is not nu metal. HellbillyWithoutACause (talk) 04:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You would win this contest if the AV Club was the final word on genre. But they aren't... a bunch of other sources discuss the album in the context of nu metal. For instance, Drowned in Sound says that the album was "...one of the first out of the gates at the nu-metal race track..." Loudwire listed the five best nu metal albums including this one. Highly respected Billboard magazine said that three "definitive" nu metal albums were released on the same day: August 18, 1998. Binksternet (talk) 07:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nu metal
Talk:Helen Parkhurst

message: copyright info from this page was used.  Please help expend this article by writing original content or by copying from (and correctly citing) something which has a free use copyright in place (original content is always best) Cavebear42 23:47, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article contradicts itself on the exact date of birth. Please review and change Willbb234 (talk) 09:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOB
Talk:Join the Army

message: the genre should also include hardcore punk because this album has not moved completely away from their early sound, the next album does. songs like possessed to skate are hardcore punk songs, this source agrees http://www.albanyarmory.com/event/614137-slayer-albany/ also this source downright lists it as hardcore punk https://newburycomics.com/rel/v2_viewupc.php?storenr=103&upc=01704613362 Realpunkmusic (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre
Talk:Ozzmosis

message: Does the Aimee song name rationale need a citation or is it obvious enough with the link to the article on her?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djozgur (talk • contribs) 00:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd need a citation for it, but I'm sure you can find one. Andre666 (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aimee song name
Talk:Scottish Bus Group

message: This article starts:
:The Scottish Bus Group is a Scottish company that owns a number of bus operators. 
I'm no expert on Scottish bus privatisation, but does the SBG really still exist and own bus operators?. If so, which ones, and who now owns the SBG?. -- Chris j wood 00:17, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership

message: To my fairly certain knowledge the claim is fair for the whole of mainland Scotland, but operations in Orkney and Shetland were carried out by independents right up to 1999. --87.244.89.153 (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "the whole of Scotland"
Talk:David Mills (author)

message: There is currently a disambiguation page for David_Mills.
May need to add a new entry to distinguish between two authors with very similar names, i.e.:
* David Mills (Amazon page http://www.amazon.com/David-Mills/e/B001HMMFHG )
* David M. Mills, PhD (Amazon page http://www.amazon.com/David-M-Mills-Ph.D./e/B00F4IA7OC )
I have not done this yet because the second one is not on Wikipedia, but should consider this if he does get an entry. --Gronk Oz (talk) 00:02, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: the external link is related to another person (a car dealer website!) 88.19.75.143 (talk) 18:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong external link
Talk:Drunk Enough to Dance

message: What is that telling anyone? 
The album release date containing that track has a release date that preceded May 20, 2003 by 9 months  — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.T.Buck (talk • contribs) 17:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Punk Rock 101" was released to radio on May 20, 2003.[2]
Talk:Turn On the Bright Lights

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 19:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Isn't the song Leif Erikson named after the Leif Erikson submarine (which, IIRC was spelled Lief Erikson) that appears in the Illuminatus! trilogy books. The submarine is of course named after Leif Erikson, the norse explorer. I believe this since, among other reference, the song Stella was a diver... is probably a reference to the character Stella of those same books. Change as apropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torgnylyon (talk • contribs) 18:54, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Leif Erikson

message: Since this is the COTW, I thought I should ask, is there a chance that the page should be renamed to Turn on the Bright Lights (notice capital!)? Looking at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), I am actually unclear from the article's lead as to what their opionion is of "on", and googling it brings up usage of each about 50/50. What does everyone think? --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 06:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  "On" Is and adverb here. It thus goes capitalised, end of discussion. ≤ alvareo [speak to me] ≥ 21:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  "End of discussion" is always a horrible way to attempt to end any discussion, especially one on a discussion-based encycopedia. The album's cover says "Turn on the Bright Lights", which is why it was titled in this manner. --SteelersFanUK06 HereWeGo2010! 01:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titling?
Talk:Cretan Gendarmerie

message: Just to clarify, this text was written by the original poster. It seems that he is knowingly releasing it under the GNU-FDL, but explicit confirmation would be great. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:47, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
I've wikified the page and rewritten it in slightly better English. However, it is still seriously POV, especially towards the end. It's also largely about Greek politics and not about the Gendarmerie per se, so a lot probably needs to be moved elsewhere. Since Balkan history isn't my speciality, if anyone feels qualified to do this then feel free. Cheers. -- Necrothesp 18:55, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The reference section should be brought up to Wiki standards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo Basil (talk • contribs) 12:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format work needed

message: This article abounds with POV. To take a random example:
On 4 October 1912 the Christian countries of the Balkans (Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro and Serbia) declared war on the Ottoman Empire. The advance of the Greek Army was rapid and on 26 October the Turks surrendered Thessaloniki (Salonika). Eleftherios Venizelos, forecasting the problems of law and order that would be presented after the liberation of the city and knowing that the Bulgarians and other European nations would like to promote a picture of chaos and a Greek state incapable of imposing order, ordered Cretan Gendarmerie units to be transported to the city.
I don't have time now to re-write everything in a proper way. Anybody volunteers to help? Bazuz (talk) 12:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious POV all around
Talk:Veterinarian

message: Life 41.13.134.96 (talk) 13:59, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  maths 

message: Good day,I need in about cats,How many years is a cat in human years 105.4.5.101 (talk) 11:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cats
Talk:Coda (file system)

message: How current is this information ? The article says AFS does not have Linux Kernel 2.6 support. I doubt that this is still true for current OpenAFS implementations.
:Coda is supported in 2.6, but it's not ready for production. Load testing with bonnie crashes venus, the client daemon, reliably (see some report at http://coda.wikidev.net/Main_Page). The development seems to have stopped pretty much, with focus in the network filesystem community moving to GFS, Lustre and similar. Gabriel Wicke 22:45, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: : "Coda has many features that are desirable for network file systems, and several features not found elsewhere..."
Are all the 9 features listed after this sentence unique to Coda?  If so, please replace the period (full stop) with a colon (:).  If not please put the clause about unique features as a separate sentence after the list of features. -Pgan002 07:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique features? 

message: It seems this article is very outdated. My gut feeling is that Coda just hasn't caught on, but I'm not sure if the project is still alive somewhere. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated
Talk:OpenAFS

message: Coda is based on AFS. Are Coda-Features still superior to OpenAFS ? Is Coda still experimental ?
-------
CODA's feature that is superior to AFS is that it can do read-write replication.  The CODA folks at CMU have expressly said, "CODA is a research project and will never be fully supported."  That said there are people who (allegedly) use it in production and there's an ad-hoc bunch of folk supporting each other.
Of course, the same can be said for running TOPS-20 on your Powerbook. :-)
IN another vein, I wonder if this page shouldn't be merged with Andrew File System .
Mizmoose 03:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed and proposed: see Talk:Andrew_File_System#merge_proposal. -- Jon Dowland 12:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

message: If someone has good information on that question, an addition to the page would be appreciated. --Nomeata (talk) 10:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the kernel driver not in the Linux kernel?
Talk:ZZ Top's First Album

message: Can someone please explain the significance of this "Seeking inspiration from Fleetwood Mac, ZZ Top began recording the album at Robin Hood Studios in Tyler, Texas." All Fleetwood Mac albums through '71 were recorded in England. Robin Hood Studios website shows no mention of Fleetwood Mac recording there ever. How exactly were ZZ Top inspired by Fleetwood Mac? 
Is it because Fleetwood Mac titled their first album "Fleetwood Mac"? OOOOHHHH, how original is that?! Fleetwood Mac was hardly the first or only one to do that at that point in time. Let's play a game, shall we, how many other bands prior to and including 1970 did that? I'll start....Black Sabbath. The Stooges. Led Zeppelin. The Doors.   Your turn....FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: ZZ Top were definitely influenced by Fleetwood Mac - the early live recordings especially show that, but also a track like "Apologies to Pearly" from the second album that directly references Peter Green's pre-FM days with John Mayall, and Billy worked on both a Peter Green tribute album and the celebration show. But you're right in that the sentence implies a causal connection between the two, which I also don't see.Jules TH 16 (talk) 08:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The mystery mention has just been deleted. Nurg (talk) 07:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleetwood Mac