lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sweden women's national football team

message: I added 'best/worst results for Sweden, 8-0 and 0-4 respectively. Those results are from http://www.svenskfotboll.se/ (landslag, damer, tidigare år - meaning national squad, ladies, previous years). The results are accurate enough, svenskfotboll.se is SvFF's own homepage - but they only cover back to (and including) 2000, so any games before that are not included in the best/worst score, and considering the first game of this team was in 1973 it's very likely these records are not the real ones. Lejman 15:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 10-0 result is from http://www.uefa.com/competitions/woco/history/season=1993/round=702/group=837.html.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lejman (talk • contribs) 15:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Even though I am not the right user to do it I think this article needs and could be expanded considerably. Look at the German teams article, I mean this one is not really good considering the Swedish teams equal popularity to Germanys team. So if someone reads this and feel they are the right user for the task then please expand the teams history at this article.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but where to start and what to add? Do you have any good sources? --Mango från yttre rymden (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: :File:Sweden new national football team logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 13:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Sweden new national football team logo.png
Talk:1995 FIFA Women's World Cup

message: Intro needs expansion, to about two paragraphs. Thanks,  A comment by a person who has been editing Wikipedia since October 28, 2010. (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:UEFA Women's Championship

message: I was going put something like 'First title', 'Second title', etc. in each page, but I'm not sure if the European Competition for Representative Women's Teams counts or not. Also, was Germany's first title the one in 1995 or in 1991? (Or in other words, should "West Germany" count as "Germany"?) --StuartBrady (Talk) 00:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winners 

message: I work for UEFA, and I am mainly updating broken links to our website (as our urls have all changed - this coud also be the case for match reports on the season pages). These are fine on the page but have clarified difference between Golden Player (a feature on the website) and Player of the Tournament (introduced in 2013 for the first time). Will leave decision on whether this will be changed/clarified further to an independent editor.
UEFAlinks (talk) 11:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Player 

message: The Medal table has team links to the men's teams. Is there a way to fix this? Aquatic Ambiance (talk) 10:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal table 

message: Current article irrelevantly mentions and compares men's and women's football. I don't know how to fix this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KnittingRhys (talk • contribs) 17:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for tagging this. I've removed the unsourced and non-neutral text and left a note on the editor's page. Tacyarg (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Praemonitus Praemunitus

message: :::--Ludvikus 00:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Does this belong in wikiquote? --Yono 23:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiquote

message: :I do not think it should be in wikiquote.
::But perhaps it should have a disambiguation.
:To distinguish the adage from the book title of the Protocols of Zion.
::And perhaps its nolomger a stub.
: yours, etc. Ludvikus 22:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Disambiguation]]?

message: Maybe DISAMBIGUATION is required for "Praemonitus praemunitus" - the Latinadage?
Yours truly, --Ludvikus 11:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a Book & a Book Title
Talk:CONCACAF W Championship

message: According to Concacaf, the history of the Concacaf Championship (which had different names over the years) featured the tournaments in four-year cycles ahead of the FIFA World Cups (1991, 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2022 etc.). The 1993 invitational tournament and 2000 Gold Cup were not part of the Concacaf Championship records.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.237.90.61 (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the Championship

message: The Gold Cup was... ? I'd say this article needs some work :-) -Koppapa (talk) 09:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Past
Talk:UEFA Women's Champions League

message: Having the winners of two legged tied twice per year now there is misleading. Is there a better way? -Koppapa (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe liberally applying rowspan?  But why was it changed in the first place?  I thought the previous format was fine.  I'm going to RV until we come to a decision, since the unregistered user who made the change didn't give an explanation (and greatly inflated the size of the article doing so). CyMoahk2 (talk) 15:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Finals list

message: "The Czech Republic replaced Austria in the top eight for 2014–15 and itself was overtaken by Spain for 2015–16." Source for the Spain part? I don't agree - my calc says czech rises to 7 (35.5p), then denmark (34.5p), then spain (34.0p). hence removing spain part.
130.240.231.125 (talk) 15:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Please compare, i have no problem though leaving it out for the next year until it is sourceable. -Koppapa (talk) 16:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Top 8
Talk:Pull-down (exercise)

message: Duh, thanks on the change to biceps. Digitalblister 23:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biceps

message: Pullups are often used with dip belts to add weight, lat pulldowns pretty much suck for some reason beyond me (something about it being an open chain movement). So, some people please change that. Also, behind-the-back pulldowns might be dangerous for the rotator cuff muscles, I heard. One last thing: proper form should be explained in this article, it's up to the trainee to decide how or when to use it and unnececary warnings like that do not have any place for them here. This is POV. If someone is bothered about it, they should open thier own page about the risks in working out. I should add: the swiss ball lovers who need to dress like they work or pose out should avoid writing up articles, seriously. User:88.155.36.26 12:56, 22 November 2006
*User:Nick deleted this at 12:57 22 November 2006, restored it. DB (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I noticed this page mentions upper traps being used in the pulldown. This is a complete fabrication and I have to control myself not to delete it immediately. I am fact-tagging it because the references listed are not possible to check (they are a book citation) and I don't believe such a book is reliable if it makes this claim. Someone else feel free to remove it, I'm adding statements to the contrary. DB (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Upper traps
Category talk:1871 in baseball

message: Having :Category:1871 establishments, akin to :Category:1871 births and :Category:1871 deaths, it doesn't seem compelling to populate this category. But National Association might go here, and that someday article on the amateur Association, and the Boston Red Stockings . . . . --P64 23:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization
Talk:The Ghost in the Machine

message: I do not have a copy of the book currently, but have been of the impression that an important argument against the behaviorist school here was the presence of humor (or laughter?) in the "machine". I would appreciate to know if I am right on this. Can anyone inform me? (I promise to get an English copy whenever I can). Hoverfish 23:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he does mention this. I have a copy at home, but haven't read it in entireity for about 20 years. --MacRusgail 14:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, it's worth adding some stuff, if you can write it well, and provide quotes etc. --MacRusgail 16:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Following this principle down to its consequences, the book gets to a theme which has somehow never ceased to be of actuality, man's tendency towards self-destruction
Does this mean something special in philosophyspeak, or could it be rewritten more clearly as "The book uses this principle to consider man's tendency to self-destruction"?  I haven't read it, so am reluctant to edit the page directly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.20.86 (talk) 01:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "never ceased to be of actuality" 

message: This line: 'The head portion of the "ghost in the machine"' is unexplained, so I can't tell what the ghost in the machine is. What is a "head portion"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.249.229.113 (talk) 21:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The head portion of the "ghost in the machine" 

message: The introduction currently contains ". One of the book's central concepts is that as the human brain evolved from, retained and built upon earlier, more primitive brain structures."
This book contains a scathing indictment of behaviourism as it's first major section (which is not mentioned above) - and the quote above is exactly the description of a central concept of behavioursim .  IMO , it is completely disingenous to include that quote because it makes it seem like Koestler (and this publication) were aligned with "behaviourism" when the book makes it clear that that was explicitly not the case .
It may be that Koestler does present of himself those words and that belief , but to include that here without context and without details about Koestler's opinion about behaviourism is a betrayal of his intention .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.54.64.131 (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jusification for Removal  

message: does koestler argue that  
* the mind DOES temporarily inhabit and govern the body? (call it option YES) 
or 
* the mind DOES NOT temporarily inhabit and govern the body? (option NO)
the way the second sentence of the article is currently written, it's unclear to me whether it's saying option YES or NO. thanks. skakEL 04:49, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  content question for a very slight copyedit 

message: The article could benefit from the addition of sections covering critical reception, popular media, and who was influenced by this book. OrangeCounty (talk) 12:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Zealand/Vandalism patrol

message: Azthetik is potentially on a vandalism spree. He has created several unsourced articles for North Shore gangs and has added the dubious assertation that The North Shore is infamously known for its major gang problem. It has a numerous amount of gangs spreading throughout the area. For a list of widely known gangs, please go to North Shore gangs. He also removed at least one speedy delete tag from his own article which I readded and warned him. While it's not certain he is vandalising it does appear his additions either need major work or should be deleted. I was planning to tag all his recent articles but could some else take care of his edits? N.B. I also added this to the Wikipedia NZ notice board Nil Einne 23:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? by Azthetik
Talk:Red (band)

message: Note: on 11 September 2006, the following discussion, relevant to the NPOV flag on the main page, was blanked. I have reinstated it. This involved losing a more recent edit which simply stated that there did not seem to be any NPOV issues. Notinasnaid 20:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I took away most of what read like a press release. However, someone should add citations still. Thief12 04:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm starting to edit it now. I saw that as well, thoguh I do love the band, the page is very biased. I'm gunna try to help this out a bit. IronCrow 19:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonneutral

message: I think the last two additions (but particularly the most recent) about the lead singer's voice are neither encyclopedic nor relevant. At the very least, they need to be referenced with some reliable, notable sources, so it's not just someone's random opinion being attached to what's supposed to be an informational work. Kiyura (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice similarities... who cares? 

message: I don't see how that's an apropriate genre for this band.Nu metal is very similar to Rapcore and mixed with Groove metal.That's not Red.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.234.107 (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nu metal?

message: Anyone else think that Symphonic Rock should be included as a genre here? It certainly fits...Red has a similar style to many in this category, and often include classical instruments in their music. Just my thoughts...
3nails4you (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Symphonic Rock

message: I changed the name in the article from "Red" to RED because that's apparently what they are usually called. Seemed to me to be their  common name--SKATER Speak. 17:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: http://www.facebook.com/redmusiconline this is their official facebook page. Should this be added?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.122.217.250 (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Please see :WP:EL. In the Links normally to be avoided section, item 10, it lists: "Links to social networking sites (such as Myspace and Facebook), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or e-mail lists." There's an official website and so they can link to their Facebook page from there. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  facebook page
Talk:Orana (comics)

message: I went and boldly moved this page from Orana to Orana (DC Comics) because it was blocking several other Orana search results from being returned, had no "other uses" text, and didn't seem to be even close to the main or most notable use of the word Orana.  So Orana is a disambiguation page now, and pages that point to it may need to be updated to point here. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:UAB Blazers football

message: SI is reporting that the program's going to be shutdown. Until there's official confirmation I think a note in the article to that effect is sufficient. Mackensen (talk) 20:38, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinuance
Talk:Remains (Alkaline Trio album)

message: Where was the tracklist from? site? Zeropunk16 00:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site? 

message: It's been confirmed that this is the wrong track-listing for this comp.
"Dead End Road" appeared on "Living Tomorrow Today - A Benefit for Ty Cambria", long before "Good Mourning" had ever been conceived.
http://www.gracenote.com/music/album.html/genalt/19e60e781522cc4206136acfa098b7df.html
Jay Bones 04:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong tracklisting 
Talk:Transcendence (Crimson Glory album)

message: John Oliva had nothing to do with the album transcendence. He only did a re recorded version of Painted Skies with Midnight, years after the album came out
i am removing it. --68.84.151.9 (talk) 21:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: John Oliva
Talk:Sevoflurane

message: "Together with desflurane, it is replacing isoflurane and halothane in modern anesthesiology"  Is this comment verifiably true?  Would someone "in the know" say that sevoflurane is the most commonly used volatile anesthetic in adults?  Thanks...  Mlbish (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I think the comment re. Sevoflurane replacing Isofluorane is overstating the case a little. 
Certainly in UK practice, Isoflurane is still by far the most commonly used agent in adult anaesthesia. It works well and is significantly cheaper than Sevoflurane (not to mention vastly less than Des). In the current economic climate pressures are increasing to justify any increased cost in an anaesthetic so I can't see the status quo changing in the foreseeable future. Other than that, good article. Thunderbirdchris (talk) 09:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacing Iso? 

message: This article, citing two different sources, says “Sevoflurane has lower values of controversial bispectral index than desflurane,” but the article on desflurane, citing one of the sources, “A recent clinical study found that desflurane has lower bispectral index and greater hypnotic effect than sevoflurane during the equipotent anesthesia.”  The source cited by both articles says, “[O]ur findings suggest a distinction between the analgesic and hypnotic effects of volatile anaesthetics, such that volatile anaesthetics have different ratios of hypnotic to analgesic potency.”  The other source, cited by only this article, is too technical for lay readers to understand.
Bwrs (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: It seems like the PANDA and GAS clinical trials have concluded, making this article's info on them out of date. Guyy8fh (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PANDA/GAS trials
Talk:Torres Strait Island languages

message: I'm curious about the claim that the western-central language of the TSI (the one which is considered an Australian language) has substantial vocabulary from Austronesian languages. I would be very surprised if this were true and would like to see a reference supporting it. Dougg 00:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Austronesian vocabulary in Western TSI language?

message: Should this perhaps be moved to Torres Strait Islander languages or Languages of Torres Strait? I'm not sure I like the grammaticality of Torres Strait Island languages, although "Torres Strait Island" as a modifier does seem to be in use. --Ptcamn 18:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Template talk:Blockquote

message: I see no reason for the usage of the positional alias for source to be marked as incorrect. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, the "incorrectly" tracking category was installed during a template merge. Now that the category is cleared, it is no longer needed. All of the numbered parameters, as fragile as they are, are supported. I have removed the "incorrectly" tracking entirely and removed  and , two parameters kept temporarily during a template merge, from the unknown parameter check. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 13 October 2023 

message: Recently the  tag has been producing some additional indentation on mobile:
This template doesn't do that, even though AFAIK it uses the blockquote element:
What happened? Can this be fixed? Hairy Dude (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: In mobile, the blockquote tag appears to include style="margin-left:41px. In the rendered template, that style is not included for some reason. I do not know how to get our CSS file to apply a style only in mobile view. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blockquote tag vs this template: strange indentation on mobile
Talk:Parlour

message: Someone with knowledge of multiple versions of the bible needs to clean up the biblical section of this article. It is completely mangled, and comes from outdated source material, from palimpsestuous editing over several years, from what looked like editwarring about Khazaks and Turks, and from who knows what else.  The present version doesn't make any sense. I've tagged the issues in it with specific inline cleanup tags. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 09:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biblical cleanup 

message: All the social history stuff (about parlours conveying social status, and "funeral parlours" etc being so named because workers converted this room into a work space) is really interesting, but also isn't cited at all. Can anyone add anything? Crinkle puca (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section lacks citations
Talk:Old Miakka, Florida

message: I'm going to note here that USGS did make a case about the spelling back in 1943 (note this is around Myakka River State Park opening to the public). It's odd that the reference from USGS notes Miakka was on maps from 1915 to the time of the report. The report states no confusion would happen with changing to Myakka and that locally it used this spelling to differ from Myakka City, Florida (this is what I thought from the start but unsure when Old was added). This info can be read from the USGS site here under the "BGN Subject Folders: (Click arrow to open folder)" section. Really interesting material. – TheGridExe (talk)  13:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Myakka versus Miakka
Talk:Land of the Blindfolded

message: Some links I collected a while back, for digesting into the Reception section then never got around to use. Offered here in case someone manages to use them before I do:
* Mania.com: v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9
* MangaLife: v1
Feel free to add to them as well, for others. Please strike out any that you've used, to avoid confusion. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews for reception
Talk:O-hook

message: Sorry for deleting. Now I realize that it is a different character. But, anyway, it is a nonsense to merge it with the article Cyrillic alphabet. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 00:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Will this article ever have a good name? The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 20:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I think the o-hook is more similar to the Greek letter Φ/φ (fee).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.242.203.111 (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  similarities
Talk:.koz

message: This was made to have others add on to this so we can have an article about what the .koz format is. Maybe the format isn't only used it the sprint music store, but thats where I found it, and thats the info that i provided. I dont think that making it redirect to the sprint page without knowing for sure that it is ONLY used by sprint is helpful, and if it is only used by sprint, than there needs to be a section in the sprint page about it if theres going to be a redirect.Hollowman512 00:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Read (American politician, born 1733)

message: No mention of slave-owning anywhere in the article. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners