Talk:Palestine Solidarity Campaign

message: mergeHistoricist (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there no mention of any of the reports of antisemitism in the PSC in this article? , , ,  and here is someone from the PSC saying that they have a problem with antisemitism in the Palestinian solidarity movement,  surely something of a few sentences can be added into this article. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There are indeed RS speaking about anti-semitism within the movement.  I added a new section for it.  -- Bob drobbs (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitism in the PSC 

message: I can't edit this article as I have less than 500 edits. Can somebody please include the successful legal challenge PSC brought against the UK Government?  They challenged Government guidance which attempted to restrict Local Government Pension Schemes from divesting "contrary to UK foreign and defence policy". Sources below. Thanks. --DSQ  (talk) 22:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supreme Court Ruling 

message: There's a major problem with sources here.  Most info on this page seems to come from the group's website or other associated group's websites.
Does anyone want to help clean that up, replacing it with info found on independent reliable sources, and removing some of what cannot be found in independent sources?
Also, does anyone want to help add some criticism which can be found in reliable sources?
-- Bob drobbs (talk) 18:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a number of cite-need and non-primary-source-need tags.  What I've tagged is not a comprehensive list of the problems.  -- Bob drobbs (talk) 23:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:SOAP and minor WP:NPOV 

message: I just removed the promo banner, but left up the issues with sources.
# PNN - Does anyone know if PNN is a reliable source or not?
# Lexis - I have no idea what this is referencing behind the paywall.
# Independent Catholic News - I'm almost positive this is an unreliable source. But I posted it in RSN to get more input before deleting it.  
--Bob drobbs (talk) 18:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source issues 

message: The thought occurs to me that the simplest way to update this article is to take a look at the Israel attack dog site https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/palestine-solidarity-campaign/ where one can find an uptodate list of atrocious antisemitic anti Israel things that PSC gets up to :) Selfstudier (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In all seriousness, the appropriate way to adjust weight in this article is probably by adding info from RS, some of which are listed in the AFD instead of just deleting any and all criticism.  -- Bob drobbs (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There are proper rs to be found for most of the  ngomonitor hitlist items. I don't mind adding criticism from serious sources and I am afraid the person currently subject of the AfD doesn't fit that description (actually, anyone who describes the United Nations as "a rabid Jew-hating forum" likely doesn't qualify, although I respect anyone's right to say such things). We have had a similar discussion already at the BDS article. Do some believe PSC antisemitic, sure. What is depressing is the dismal sourcing for this assertion.Selfstudier (talk) 18:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating tag 

message: This edit must be reverted. User talk:Nableezy., in his talk page, erroneously  accused Bob_drobbs of "making things up" when the sources clearly corroborate everything that Bob_drobbs wrote. RafaelJC12 (talk) 19:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The source does not in any way relate to the PSC. This is covered in the sections above. The Spedding piece makes one remark on one local meeting, and as such it fails WP:WEIGHT to include here. nableezy - 19:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 December 2021 

message: Citation no.2 does not support the claim made in text. 51.187.87.91 (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I have tagged the content that failed verification. Leaving this open for now. M.Bitton (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

text: -Lemonaka‎ 13:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure why this was closed. Pinging the most active editors on this talk page:  could you please check the tagged content and see whether it's worth keeping? Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: removed. nableezy - 14:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the reply. Is there a reason why you kept the rest (in the "Boycott Israeli goods campaign" section)? M.Bitton (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, just didnt see it. Removing that now too. nableezy - 14:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought as much. M.Bitton (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 March 2023