lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of populated places in Colorado: A–F

message: This is the first sublist of the extended List of populated places in Colorado. The extended list is composed of the following four parts:
*REDIRECT 
**List of populated places in Colorado: A–F
**List of populated places in Colorado: G–O
**List of populated places in Colorado: P–Z
Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 14:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization of this list

message: Anyone who disagrees with data listed in the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) should contact the United States Board on Geographic Names at BGNexec@usgs.gov. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 19:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Each location and elevation in this list includes the location and elevation reference source in the location code, e.g., . Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 20:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic Names Information System 

message: Early railroads established section houses for housing maintenance crews at intervals of approximately . Sometimes an extended community would develop around the section house. Most section houses were eventually abandoned, thus creating an extinct populated place. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 20:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section house
Talk:Tvangeste

message: The original version of this article has been blatantly ripped from Miron's interview.
I've NPOV'ized it somewhat (probably adding some substandard English during that process -- feel free to correct this) and cleaned it up. VladimirKorablin July 2, 2005 10:50 (UTC)
:i made one or two little grammatical corrections and removed Iced Earth because their sounds arent very similar at all. Miles 18:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "it receives great reviews" I don't see any reviews linked so I'll just keep the template until we get some--Iopq 18:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced 
Talk:Stereo MC's

message: So, is their genre "electronica" or "hip-hop"?  Make up your mind, article.
82.93.10.238 (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: May I suggest moving this page to Stereo MCs? Tim Ivorson 2 July 2005 10:48 (UTC)
Surely this should be Stereo MC's? Leaving alone for the moment America's loose grip of the English language :p Stereo MC's is the bands name so surely that should be the title of this entry? 82.39.188.161 17:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Their album art is unambiguous. Also, the rule against an apostrophe here is surely prescriptive and fairly new. 24.52.124.254 (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move
Talk:Lisa the Simpson

message: Do you think this episode has references to the movie "Network"?- B-101 2 July 2005 11:52 (UTC)
I didn't think that it was possible to have an entire article on this episode without mentioning "Flowers for Algernon".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drsruli (talk • contribs) 09:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: </div> --Hemlock Martinis 23:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successful GA nomination 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, MASEM 00:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps (Pass)

message: Weird.Homer's half-brother,herb, is smart,while his half-sister,abbie, is dumb.So it is all a lie.Or,since they inherit 50% of the simpson gene,we can theorize that,herb,for exanple,had a mother that had an I.Q. that overcomed the simpson gene,or 50% of the gene was not enough. abbie had a mother that was dumb,too,or also had the gene.below,herb and homer.--Super cyber venom 2099 Scarlet Spider (talk) 01:59, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  contrary 

message: I'm not sure if there should be a trivia section in this article, but I found out about a funny scene not listed in the article. During one point, Rod and Todd Flanders find a baseball cap in the Kwik-E-Mart called "The OFFENSIVE Baseball Cap" The 2 twins read the cap saying "Show me your--HEY!" At that point, Ned Flanders covers their eyes and tells them "It says 'Show me your tie.' It's cute, c'mon let's go!". For the record (do not mention this in any trivia section), it says "Show me your tits."--Tomballguy (talk) 01:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Rugii

message: Rug - Rus (another Germanic tribe, which founded Novgorod and Kievan Rus states)
are they related ?
::Yes, they were both Scandinavian tribes, but they are not related not by name :).--Wiglaf 2 July 2005 12:32 (UTC)
Also connected to the Rugians (Rygi) are the Ulm(e)rugi, Holmrugi (Ulmgeri, Holmgeri), some lived in Kulmigeria. Labbas 5 October 2006
This is rather all occult nonsense... Rujani were Slavic tribes, Pomorjani ("by the Sea/Ocean"); "Pomerians" who lived around the city called Mikulinbor (later Meckleburg).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.143.111.196 (talk) 19:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Those references to old Swedish encyclopedias aren't as reliable as commonly believed. They tend to refer to old nationalist theories drawing too speculative conclusions from very weak connections. Such as: rug may actually have had some meaning that was shared in the words that later become Rugians and Rogaland. But that doesn't mean that Rugians came from Rogaland, like the theory that Goths came from Götaland is disputed in Sweden. Rursus 12:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, it is infected in Sweden. Insecure matters such as these are safe targets for anti-nationalistic scholars who want to score points against nationalistic ones. Dick Harrison is a good example.--Berig 12:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be very wise to add citations from known good work on this one. ;) 87.248.4.221 (talk) 23:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just saw in a modern book on archaeology (2008) that scholars "still" place the Rugians in Rogaland. Could Rursus please provide any references against this connection?--Berig (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubts: Rugians from Rogaland

message: Because both the Germanic Rugi and the Slavic Rani have both been known as "Rugians", the article about the Germanic tribe should be moved to Rugi and Rugians should become a disambiguation page. Olessi 21:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Please remove the words that make it sound past tense, I mean a entire ethnic group can't die can it?--User:Xgmx (SpEaK 2 mE)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.244.36.142 (talk) 04:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It can disappear by blending. —Tamfang (talk) 06:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove the were 

message: B. Khmel'nitskiy:
(ukr. text:)

Б. Хмельницький Білоцерковний универсал Б. Хмельницького  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vognejar (talk • contribs) 18:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ukrainian cossacks - Rugii 

message: : The tribal name "Rugii" or "Rygir" is a derivate of the Old Norse term for rye, rugr ....
: In modern Lithuanian, the word "rugys" (singular) and "rugiai" (plural), is a term for rye.
What makes the Lithuan cognate more relevant or interesting than, say, English rye or Bulgarian rŭž or Welsh rhyg or Estonian rukis? —Tamfang (talk) 06:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  why Lithuania?
Talk:List of kings of Burgundy

message: Most recent archaeological and historical studies of the Germanic peoples question the historical accuracy of traditional accounts of origins and migrations.  Can anyone find a reliable recent source supporting the story of origins in Bornholm and subsequent migrations?  --SteveMcCluskey 22:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin stories need special care 

message: Why do we stop the list in 1254?  That seems very arbitrary.  The natural date to stop, I should think, would be 1378. john k (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  post-1254 

message: "Flavius Aëtius moves the Burgundians into Sapaudia (Upper Rhône Basin)." -- since he was a Roman general presumably this was a military pushback? This wording makes it sound like he was their leader and saw greener pastures.
Also, just prior to that, do we have three sons sharing the throne? Elinruby (talk) 01:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: There is a line in the article that Burgundy would have a separate administration under the Franks. Can someone explain what this means? As far as I am aware of, there wasn't anything like a modern administration in the Early Middle Ages, there were just royal courts and local rulers. So is there any kind of local rulership here? By whom? Marcocapelle (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate administration under the Franks?
Talk:Geographical indication

message: This needs examples. Would, say, Florida orange juice be one? if not, the article also needs clarification. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.91.43.225 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 2 July 2005  (UTC)
:There article currently has examples (e.g. Bordeaux and parmigiano). --Swift 22:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples needed 

message: Attention users/WPedians/Admns
Some Anon has pasted provisions of Indian Stautes on GI's word by word, probably because he is unaware of WP's policies and the needs of the article. The article needs immediate cleanup by the administrators....Anon Alleged vandal of Diamirza article'(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dia_Mirza) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.248.32.114 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 12 July 2006  (UTC)
:I've removed the statutes. --Swift 22:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian statutory provisions 

message: Why is there no mention of this system? Why doesn't it even have a wiki of its own?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.178.17.124 (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lisbon System 

message: There also doesn't seem to be any mention of time limits in the article, India for e.g. is supposed to have only 20 years of protection, it would be interesting to know if others have same or increased number of years protection.Shirishag75 (talk) 00:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection Period Limits 

message: Dr. Kirsten has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Kirsten has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Bienabe, Estelle & Bramley, Cerkia & Kirsten, Johann & Troskie, Dirk, 2011. "Linking farmers to markets through valorisation of local resources:the case for intellectual property rights of indigenous resources," MPRA Paper 31615, University Library of Munich, Germany.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is Dr Kirsten? Does he/she have a first name? --165.225.80.244 (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Kirsten's comment on this article 
Talk:Headwind and tailwind

message: I am suggesting a single page merge for at least head and tailwind. They really have no major difference in content that they need two articles. Presumably to some article such as headwind and tailwind. TheHYPO (talk) 01:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that happened, but now we have two different sections with nearly identical wording.  Thundermaker (talk) 13:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I think there is an error on this page caused from copying sentances from the headwind page.  Where the article states: "A headwind increases the object's speed and reduces the time required to reach its destination."  I beleive it should say tailwind instead of headwind.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.235.146 (talk) 15:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: The current wording makes it sound as if headwind and tailwind are separate components.  They are not; they are opposite views of the same component.  If headwind is X, tailwind is -X.  I am going to fix this and add sourcing.  Thundermaker (talk) 13:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  three components???
Talk:Omaha Police Department

message: Let the record state that Bibbins was fleeing police on city streets at high speed, placing law-abiding citizens at severe risk. Bibbin's conduct while driving in such an uncivil manner, with no regard for the safety of others, surely affedted how an officer would respond after Bibbins crashed into a fence and the officers pursuing were able to approach him. Here in Omaha, it seems that some groups are quick to shout "racism," seeing that trait in something as innocious as a loaf of white bread.68.13.191.153 16:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Patches Welcome".  So long as you cited your work, it would be perfectly acceptable addition.  The event needs a citation, anyway. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: George Bibbins Shooting

message: This article is completely devoid of citations, particularly for charged events that can easily be construed as POV. Please add citations. – Freechild (¡!¡!¡!¡) 17:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: Why is this article separated from Omaha Nebraska? It is good that it is in that it is so bad an article that it could only detract from the main Omaha article.  And who changed the motto to "To sizzle and pop?"  Undoubtedly one of my Omaha neighbors.  Behave yourselves, children!  In my opinion as a Wikipedian (rather than as an Omahan) this article should be taken down, it is, except for a few factual sentences, nothing but a tirade against the police department. Anewcharliega (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: An article separate from Omaha Nebraska is warranted because details like the command structure, history of chiefs, and Specialized divisions and units, are useful data that added into the general Omaha article would make the article to big. Most cities Omaha's size have separate articles for their police departments. Its consistent with how things are done and useful. If the article is lacking in quality but a worthy topic the thing to do is edit it to improve, not to "take it down."Tjc (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a Separate Article? 

message: , in this 2015 edit, removed a substantial section on misconduct. I have not restored this material because it was not cited, but I welcome anyone who wants to take the time to find citations for that material to replace it. Also note that this is a clear WP:COI problem that I do not believe had been adequately addressed at this time. -Apocheir (talk) 00:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by [[User:Omahapolice]]
Talk:Sydney central business district

message: Would anyone be opposed to me making File:Downtown-Sydney-CBD.jpg the main image in the infobox? The current image, while very appealing, is cliched in that its always used in Sydney related articles especially when discussing the CBD. A change in the angle and view is needed and the image itself is of a good standard. 
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.214.190 (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image change 

message: So the article title is 'Sydney central business district', all lower case after the first word, yet the first line in the lead has each word in upper case, though it is lower case thereafter in the body. Which is correct? I note capitalised is the predominant result from Google searches. Damien Linnane (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitals? 
Talk:Ivan Wyschnegradsky

message: Are there any details of the 'mystic vision' that inspired him to work in microtones? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.113.34.35 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What mystic vision? 

message: This page needs to be moved to Ivan Wyschnegradsky, the guy's own preferred spelling.  I started to do it, but the process turned out not to be as simple as I was led to believe.  Anyone who knows what they're doing is welcome to fix my incompetence.  --  JackofOz (talk) 07:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move required
Talk:Bahai (disambiguation)

message: Look, this is not the place to discuss how many LSA's everybody has, or who is right about the Covenant. Give just enough information to get people to the page they're looking for, please. Dawud 2 July 2005 14:29 (UTC)
:You don't think its important to say the relative size differences then? -- Tomhab 4 July 2005 22:43 (UTC)
It already says the Haifa group is the largest. If you want to qualify that with "overwhelmingly" I wouldn't object. However, we don't really know the populations of any of these groups, so specific numbers would be out of place, I think. And the number of LSA's has nothing to do with anything, except possibly establishing a minimum figure. Dawud 06:25, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've expanded the entries under the disambiguation page, however I don't think this category actually requires a disambiguation page.  It's not as if there is another competing definition for Bahá'í (like there is for mercury), rather different sectarian groupings have different beliefs and opinions.  Thus, the page should attempt to represent an NPOV between the various sectarian interpretations (as a general page) with links to specific pages for separate groups. Sufisticated 02:23, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: that already exists Bahá'í divisions.  Given that disambiguation pages are usually much shorted, I recommend that the page goes back to the previous format -- Jeff3000 03:54, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely, I'm going to revert. This is not the format of a disambiguation page, and this is covered under Baha'i Divisions. See Divisions of Islam for an example. Cuñado  - Talk 06:26, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding disambiguation page 

message: Should this page not be redirected to Bahai (disambiguation)? Wiki-uk (talk) 09:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is completed. Wiki-uk (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diacritics in title? 

message: If this heading/link belongs on the disambiguation page at all (questionable) - it doesn't seem to me to belong under the "Baha'i Faith" heading - which otherwise disambiguates between "varieties" of the Faith, not (rather indirectly) related subheads, which are in general (correctly, I think) avoided. Disambiguation pages are for disambiguation - putting the terraces under the heading almost gives an impression that there exists a group of covenant breakers with the title "The Terraces". Personally I would not have this line at all on this page, but if it must be it needs its own line...--Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baha'i terraces
Talk:Henry Joy McCracken

message: Francis Joy a realtive, founded the Belfast News Letter in 1737 which is still published to this day and is a staunchly Unionist newspaper, refelcting the Presbyterian change of perspective after the Act of Union and the relaxation of the Penal Laws.
----
If it was founded in 1737 as a staunchly Unionist newspaper and remained so post 1801 it didn't reflect a change of perspective.--213.94.205.109 11:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of birds of Oklahoma

message: Because of the large number of changes necessitated by the update to the Check-list of North and Middle American Birds which the American Ornithological Society published on June 30, 2020, the revisions to this article are presented here rather than in a long series of edit summaries. Changes are per the AOS unless otherwise noted.
*Revise the references, counts, and text in the introduction.
*Make position of images consistent.
*Add 3 species per eBird.
*Revise (A) tags per Lepage.
*Revise multiple families' common names per Clements.
*Revise the sequence of species in family Phasiannidae (Pheasants, grouse, and allies).
*Revise the sequence of species in genus Selasphorus (Hummingbirds).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Rallidae (Rails, gallinules, and coots).
*Revise the sequence of families in order Suliformes.
*Revise the sequence of species in family Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants and shags).
Craigthebirder (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 5, 2020 revisions 

message: These are the changes made to update this list to the 2021 Check-list of North and Middle American Birds published by the American Ornithological Society (AOS) on June 29, 2021.
*Revise the sequence of families in Order Passeriformes.
*Split mew gull into common gull and short-billed gull and revise entries accordingly.
*Revise the binomials of cormorant species.
*Revise the specific epithet of crested caracara.
*Revise the genus and position of ruby-crowned kinglet.
*Revise text, counts, and references as appropriate.
Craigthebirder (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2021 revision
Talk:Basis set (chemistry)

message: *"this led to huge computational savings…"
*"This adds some additional…."
*This is an important result when considering accurate…."
*"The smallest of these are called …"
*"These are auxiliary functions …"
*"These are very shallow Gaussian…"
--Smokefoot 21:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "This" and "these" as subjects make articles difficult to understand

message: "The 'cc-p', stands for 'correlation-consistent polarized' and the 'V' indicates they are valence-only basis sets"
Valence only? I'm not so sure... I think 'cc-pV' should be read 'correlation consistent' and 'polarized valence'. As the article is written now it sounds like the non-valence orbitals aren't described at all in these basis sets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.178.54.111 (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunning's basis sets 

message: Would anyone be willing to write something about effective core potential basis sets such as LANL2DZ and SDD?  That article is quite physics heavy.  It's quite common for chemists to used ECPs for metals and Pople type basis sets for ligands but I think few people who actually do this understand what an ECP is (including me).Pelirojopajaro (talk) 22:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effective Core Potentials 

message: The article is missing a section on LAPW basis sets. I will add one. I hope, this is okay. If you believe it can be improved, feel free to do so or make a comment in this discussion so that I or someone else can include your improvements. GreSebMic (talk) 14:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  LAPW basis sets