Talk:Polish rabbit

message: I don't know how to tag the whole article to indicate this, but it seriously needs a rewrite to put it in more neutral language.  Text with exclamation points ("...makes great pets!") is inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry.Strumphs 23:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Encyclopedia Style 

message: I don't know how to edit, but I know the guidelines, and this article breaks all of them. Someone needs to tag this article or delete it and start over.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.210.12.150 (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-neutral, poorly written, uncited 

message: I've never seen an article written this badly. It's so terrible, I'm surprised it hasn't been deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.33.174.133 (talk) 16:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Badly written, not neutral

message: I've noticed a lot of NPOV, duplications (repeated rabbit care information in breed articles, in itself non-encyclopaedic), contradictions (Rabbits do/don't mix well with cats and dogs - though I've noticed some confusion on this subject in other sources of rabbit info, too; there also seem to be some contradictions on the subject of what rabbits should be fed with) and very informal language. Overenthusiastic rabbit owners/breeders?
I've also noticed a lot of frankly useless and empty statements like "This breed is full of personality". That's nice. A wasp nest has a "personality", and a very noticeable one at that, but I wouldn't want one in my home. I'd suggest that better definitions of the particular breed personalities are given, but from what I've read online, half the people involved don't seem to support pinning of stereotypical personalities to rabbit breeds.
Another possible problem is that a lot of the links go straight to breeder websites, which, it barely needs to be pointed out, sell rabbits. Some seem to go straight to a catalogue-type listing of rabbits for sale. Should they be removed?
Also, check out the author signature on this page. My reaction was halfway between a groan of frustration and an "Awww, someone was proud of their work.". Smacks of editing by a kid, to me.
Oh, and Somebody Keeps Writing About How Jersey Wooleys Should Be Judged At Shows In Golemspeak. Metasyntactic D (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Seems to be a feature common to pet rabbit articles

message: I have a Polish rabbit, and it looks nothing like the picture. The breeder is a professional, and said it was Polish, plus when you type "Polish rabbit" in Google images you mostly get what my rabbit looks like. 74.33.174.133 (talk) 01:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Are you sure that's a Polish rabbit?

message: Article has been almost completely rewritten to address the comments here.  The photo of the Netherland Dwarf rabbit has been replaced with a correct photo of an American Polish.
(Supertwist (talk) 19:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes made 

message: The title of the article should be changed to "Polish (United Kingdom)/ Britania Petite (United States of America) rabbit", as there is also another rabbit breed in the United States of America called the polish. GoatLover1234 (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title