lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Marathon 2: Durandal

message: I just noticed where the link goes and it's not quite accurate. Marathon 2: Durandal ran, IIRC, on Windows 95 and up. Not Windows 3.1 or DOS. I figured this would be accurate and give readers a better idea of exactly what OS it ran on on a PC.--FazzMunkle 09:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mind if I change [[PC]] to [[Microsoft Windows]]? 

message: my xbox magazine completly destroyed it saying its level design is crap and then it is inferior to doom and isnt worth 10 bucks. the only thing they liked was the lobby for multiplayer, thats about it.....
:well i love the game. especially coop. im currently 5th on the coop leaderboard. i think its a great game. and, it doesnt make me motion sick.
 
Dude this game is far superior to doom in graphics gameplay, and design.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JaredLevi (talk • contribs) 23:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  favorable reviews for 360 version?? 

message: That's all. Clicking on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_One_(game_engine) leads here. Plus, there is also a recursive entry within this page to Aleph One. Sparkwoodand21 (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out. The best explanation of the Aleph One engine is on the Trilogy page, but I cannot change the redirect because it is protected. I have asked the editor who made the original redirect for help in changing it. --Iritscen (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Okay, I think the redirect now points to the best explanation of the engine. Let me know if you have any other suggestions. --Iritscen (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsure why Aleph One (Game Engine) links here 
Talk:Timeless (Goldie album)

message: the intro seems to have alot of unverified , advert like claims. Cinnamon colbert (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. I've added a POV tag to it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the POV tag to Original Research. This will convey both the neutrality bit and also the article's need of sources. -M.Nelson (talk) 03:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: unsupported claims advert like
Talk:Choose One

message: :Image:1200 Techniques - Choose One.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1200 Techniques - Choose One.jpg
Talk:Consistency Theory

message: :Image:1200 Techniques - Consistency Theory.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1200 Techniques - Consistency Theory.jpg
Talk:Abraham ben Elijah of Vilna

message: I made some NPOV edits to get rid of the condescending language often employed by the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.
I think we should get rid of the Unicode characters, but they are not displaying well (I'm getting boxes). Could someone who can see them replace them with normal letters? JFW | T@lk 09:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there are still many more POV comments in the article. --רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 11:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bloc Party (EP)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 17:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Catalog 3

message: since there is no reliable information about the existence of this album, unless someone can provide such, i will rewrite this article to reflect the speculative nature of its content--Lotsofmagnets (talk) 20:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious existence
Talk:Play by Numbers (EP)

message: since there is no reliable information about the existence of this album, unless someone can provide such, i will rewrite this article to reflect the speculative nature of its content--Lotsofmagnets (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious existence 

message: A screencap of the video here could provide a higher quality, higher resolution image for this article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRLp-M3yhM0
The authenticity of that upload has now been debated for a while, although the artwork is the highest resolution artwork available online and its source (whoever possibly scanned it - take note of the staple mark) remains unknown. 
It is likely that this has already been done and uploaded to discogs, though I am not sure. Anyways, replacing the current image with that one would improve the article.
Swim Jonse (talk) 02:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Higher quality artwork
Talk:Hooper Bay (EP)

message: if anyone is interested, the full real album has been leaked onto the internet as of may 2009, the songs have the same corresponding ending times as of all the supposed real ones that have been listed on discogs.org, once more inforation is available I'll update the entry with said info.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.143.53.6 (talk) 07:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  album leak 

message: since there is no reliable information about the existence of this album, unless someone can provide such, i will rewrite this article to reflect the speculative nature of its content--Lotsofmagnets (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious existence 

message: I went ahead and changed the producer section of the infobox from the brothers' names to just the name of the band, reason being that at this time there were at least three members of the band (possibly more if a lot of older information is correct) and although the Old Tunes tapes were released credited to only Marcus and Mike, Twoism was not despite being released the same year as Old Tunes, Vol. 1. With this in mind, it is perhaps best that the producer section either be omitted or simply credited to the band name, seeing as we have no way of knowing just who in fact "produced" these releases within the band. It's likely that it never has been anyone other than the brothers, but it's just probably not necessary. 
Anyways, about this release - it is understood that this marked the first usage of the voices of children. This would become a staple of BoC's work up until the dramatic shift of The Campfire Headphase in 2005 and I believe that's something to possibly note in the article. I just don't know where the source for that is and don't have the time to go digging through bocpages at the moment. If anyone remembers where the source for this is, please mention it in the article. 
Swim Jonse (talk) 02:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  General cleanup of purported old releases + something about this one
Talk:Old Grandma Hardcore

message: Hi!   My Grandmother is the subject of this article, thus I know it would be improper for me to contribute to the discussion for this entry; however I have external press links I can provide for expansion.   What should I do?
:G'day! If they're just links to external press sites, then I see no problems in you adding the links to a References section, in line with other articles. If you wanted to add any other information about OGHC, you would be best off checking WP:AUTO first. Confusing Manifestation 15:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Importance? But she's HARDCORE! Honestly, this lady is well-known. No less than the Washington Post article has a summary where it refers to her as "famous".  And the SMH refers to, among other things, the "international media attention" she has received.  There is no question of her notability. Pity I'm too lazy to expand the article atm, maybe someone else'll do it or I'll do it later.  Georgeslegloupier 17:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Ethics...
Talk:Anumati

message: Copy-edited.  Not sure if things are exactly right concerning the use of the Hindi phrases.  I would suggest, though, splitting this article into two, as it seems to be about two very different things.  It definitely needs to be expanded considerably. Macwhiz (talk) 03:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to Jac16888 for handling that bit of translation at the bottom of the page.  It was really bugging me! Macwhiz (talk) 23:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Music Has the Right to Children

message: Does anyone have any information about the cover art? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.245.5.128 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Covert art

message: I'm not really sure how to do it, but if someone cites http://www.boardsofcanada.com/discography.html that should take care the first and third points in the Miscellanea section--Stillwell 22:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack of citing note 

message: I added the Genre tags IDM, Ambient Techno and Trip Hop. I think they are the most appropiate - ZEROpumpkins (talk) 06:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think IDM should be removed, because even Dubstep has more relevancy and accuracy in relation to the sound of the album than IDM does.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertWesker411 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: Resources on the first reference are gone on the following page's links pertaining to this reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.66.57 (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: A BoC fan might tell you that there are (at least) two unlisted tracks on this album, "It's Too Orangey" and "Blueberry", which play after a period of silence in "Triangles & Rhombuses" and "Sixtyten", respectively. Should they be integrated into the track listing, or is that too BoC-crufty? Thunderbunny (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlisted Tracks
Talk:Peel Session (Boards of Canada EP)

message: Can someone verify the date of the session? BBC seems to have it down as 1998-06-16 not july as per original article
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/johnpeel/sessions/1990s/1998/Jun16boardsofcanada/
even http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Peel_sessions#B has it listed at the same date (although I suspect that content has been lifted from BBC website)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elwell (talk • contribs) 08:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Bands often recorded their sessions weeks in advance of Peel presenting the recordings on-air. It seems the recording date was 16 June and the airdate was 21 July. I updated the article accordingly. However, I can't verify the airdate; I'm just trusting that the date printed on the Warp releases is correct. —mjb (talk) 11:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Session Date 

message: I have moved the article.
* Old title: Peel Session TX 21/07/1998
* New title: Peel Session (Boards of Canada EP)
TX 21/07/1998 does not appear anywhere on the 1999 release. Instead, TX appears above 21/07/98 (without a "19" in the year) on the front cover art (and without "TX" on the CD label), but this is, at most, a subordinate title. A less generous interpretation, the one I'm going with, is that it's just an informative annotation which is completely separate from the main title, Peel Session, which is presented by itself on the spine of the CD packaging and on the labels of the vinyl record.
—mjb (talk) 11:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rename
Talk:Some Great Reward

message: strange 
how it can be that it reached only # 54 but on year end # 91?
was this in the 80s usually  and common ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.54 (talk) 18:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It also states in the opening that the album reached #51 in the US, whereas in the charts table it says it reached #54. Which one is correct? --Geach (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Depeche Mode discography, the album peaked at number 54 so I've changed it accordingly. --Geach (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peak Position  # 54 in the US but year end # 91 ?? 
Talk:Black Celebration

message: Hello there. 3 possible issues with this Article. (1) The Black Celebration article on an Android smartphone running Google Chrome browser mobile in simple mode does not have a /talk\ or discussion link about the article, when I switched to desktop mode in my phone's browser, the Talk link appeared. I've never seen that before. (2) this article has a link to a single called, But not tonight. However, clicking this link does an instantaneous redirection once it loads, and brings the web visitor to the article for the single by Depeche mode called, Stripped. (3) Hence, I guess number three is that an article for But not tonight has been deleted? I guess that means in this article that the link can be removed, rather than redirecting to Stripped which is a different song, no? Thanks. -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 18:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three (3) possible Article Issues, tech glitches Jun 8 2021
Talk:Ultra (Depeche Mode album)

message: Why the genre 'Rock' is incorrect:
Daniel Miller Quote (p 333, in the book ‘Stripped’ By Jonathan Miller): “The thing is, they’re not a rock band... because it’s not pure [rock ‘n roll]. There’s a horrible kind of authenticity about rock music, and they’re definitely not authentic in that sense” </ref>http://books.google.com/books?id=gIrZbmss3kEC&pg=PA333&lpg=PA333&dq=martin+gore+depeche+mode+%22not+a+rock+band%22&source=web&ots=67M7nujLj1&sig=Z4Iq30etb0pSfB-mvB_ceTps3Ns&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result.</ref>Kalied04 (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Rock' /Synth 'Rock'/Alternative 'Rock' / Industrial 'Rock' 
Talk:Da Game Is to Be Sold, Not to Be Told

message: Does biggie have to mentioned in the background that has nothing to do with the album even tho it's connected to Pac's death. Pac's death is kinda notable due to the circumstances surrounding the release of Doggfather and how that failure led to this album but like, are those deaths THAT relevant to the album itself LuckyTaaru (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background
Talk:No Limit Top Dogg

message: I would need some assisstane in identifying two samples whose origin can be derived by tracking down from the writers credits. "In Love with a Thug" is composed by The Art of Noise, and "I Love My Momma" is by Lenny Williams. Any guess? Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 21:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samples
Talk:Bagalamukhi

message: fhfhghghghfghfghhfghfhfhgfhgf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.162.95.244 (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of streaming media systems

message: How about adding these to the Comparison of streaming media systems?
I agree, as the table of comparison holds itself a list. This article is redundant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.216.42.156 (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison 

message: "EVE is a new engine ruunning streaming audio/ video for the VM Direct corp."
I don't known who added this, but this is a better place for it. Stephen B Streater 16:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EVE 

message: "Zina: Open source alternative to Andromeda written in PHP"
Fair enough.  What's 'Andromeda' then?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deke42 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andromeda / Zina 

message: This list seems to be a mix of open-source and commercial products (Wowza for example). Is that acceptable? There are a lot of commercial streaming media systems out there. Why do some get onto this list and others don't?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.183.151 (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial products on this list 

message: Further to the above I've added an external link to a commercial RTSP streaming product, Packet Ship, with an NPV description - I hope that is acceptable.  It is relatively notable within its specialist domain (hotel VOD systems).  sandtreader (talk) 12:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Packet Ship 

message: Please take a look at http://streamer.makradio.ru
It is a radio automation software with php web based interface. Is it possible to add this program to the list?  31.128.143.75 (talk) 11:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makradio Streamer 

message: Is this article intended to be a complete list? If not, why not? If so, shouldn't it have a ?
This article does not list Internet pornography#Video files and streaming video. Is there a reason? If such are listed, should they be listed here, or should there be a link to a separate article? —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not supposed to be a complete list. It only lists links to existing articles (that are notable per WP:N). As the introductory comment on the page says: "All entries that point to non-existent articles or external links will be deleted." My understanding is that the article primarily focuses on software streaming media systems and servers, not on video hosting services such as pornographic video hosting service websites. These are listed in List of video hosting services, which includes pornographic video sharing wesbsites, too.—J. M. (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completeness
Talk:Bhumiya

message: is it possible that Bhumiya is an other name for OSIRIS, and that Vishnu and Osiris have connection??? If the Brahmin`S came to north India around 1700 B.C. from Mesopotamia, Lord Vishnu must have been a God in India since 10 000 B.C.,He is before Vedas????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.226.5.144 (talk) 17:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bhuvaneshvari

message: In copyediting this section to replace spaces removed by a vandal, I came across the following: "His hair was matted and was decorated by a crescent moon and Ganga." What is the "ganga"? Not the river, I suppose. Images of Shiva seem to show the moon and a cobra, and not the river; however, the images I've located do not show the five-faced Shiva. I am leaving the passage with the link ganga, knowing that it is probably very wrong. Would a subject editor kindly step in and make some sense here? Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it  too much imaginary???  How can there billions or trillions of trimurti and tridevi   ???  Shaktipujari (talk) 04:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: And if there then where is vaikunth??  Where is kailash  ?? As we all know bhrama was born out of a lotus flower appeared from Vishnu's navel. It is also said that after churning  ocean the earth had appeared only.  And why will Godness Bhuvaneshvari will be their with her consort??  Then who is the primary and all mighty???  Shaktipujari (talk) 04:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, Shaktipujari. Are you trying to improve the article?--Quisqualis (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bhuvaneshvari#Legend|Legend]] section
Talk:Holtzman effect

message: Is there any reason not to merge this article into the Technology of the Dune universe article?
I'm not sure that this subject is notable in and of itself, other than being one of the technologies in the series. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 20:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As this fails notability, I think this is the right outcome. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: — TAnthonyTalk 06:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Technology of Dune
Talk:A Present for Everyone

message: The bonus track Loner in Love is actually track 11 (coming after Why) in the British special edition but I cannot get the title to show as anything other than untitled if I change it from 12 to 11. Can anyone help with this?Tk420 (talk) 11:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeepsi (talk) 11:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with track listing
Talk:Tanith

message: I am proposing that all the :Category:Warhammer 40,000 planets articles be merged into a single Planets of Warhammer 40,000 article. Please read this page and place all comments on this page. -Localzuk (talk) 10:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: 84.173.238.42 added a statement claiming that Tanith is a small country in central Asia.  I cannot find any information about such a country.  Can you please provide a citiation?  Thanks.--67.169.111.10 00:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it - there is no such country. ... discospinster talk 00:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't think so.  I was just trying to assume good faith.  I'm kind of new at this. Thanks. --67.169.111.10 15:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Country?

message: DJ Tanith, relatively famous german techno- and breakbeat-producer, might be added.195.46.247.152 20:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More People
Talk:Caller ID spoofing

message: Mention if caller IDs prepended with "[v]" (verified) can also be faked by the criminal simply appending the "[v]" himself, or not. Or maybe if the name is also in lower case, that means it wasn't spoofed? Jidanni (talk) 01:13, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  V for Verified
Talk:True Story (album)

message: Can somebody please include who produced this album. I wouldn't have a clue. --Taurus8 sam 10:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producers 