lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Smith College alumni

message: Shouldn't this page properly be titled Smith College alumnae? cbustapeck 02:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I have made changes from alumni to alumnae, but do not know how to edit the category page.  Yes, it should be Smith College alumnae —Msearl 09:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Smith College men are accepted on the small graduate programme so "alumnae" is technically inaccurate as the ex student body is mixed. Timrollpickering (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing category title

message: Many women are known (and have a wikipedia article) by a married name, different from their name while at Smith. Is there a protocol for identifying them correctly on the Smith College alumnae/i page? TanneC (talk) 14:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification by name
Talk:Mirror types

message: This article will need to be merged into Mirror. It does not comply with Wikipedia's style guidelines. I think the person who created it was thinking of a disambiguation page, but did not understand the purpose of those pages. This reads like an attempt to create a little "index". Wikipedia does not use such indexes, but rather links to information within articles, and within their "see also" sections.--Srleffler 02:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Combined DNA Index System

message: I find the expression "computer system that solves crimes" a bit childish.  I can't imagine anyone calling a magnifying glass a "visual aid that solves crimes"...  It's a tool, nothing more.  Anyone mind if i change this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.133.166.197 (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "computer system that solves crimes"
Category talk:Palestinian militant groups

message: From 2000 to the present the media has waged a war against israel in order to make public opinion lean to the palestinian side of the conflict a basic media spin is to call terrorists militants, because if you use the word terrorist, which the public sees as 'bad' people, they will side with the israelis even though it is the correct word--69.114.174.131 02:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  palestinian terrorist groups
Talk:Ferntree Gully railway station

message: According to these sources "Ferntree Gully" is the official and/or common name:
*VicSig says "Ferntree Gully" with "Fern Tree Gully" being a former name..
*Connex also uses "Frentree Gully" for both station names..
*Official government geographic names register uses "Ferntree Gully" and "Upper Ferntree Gully" for the railway station names.
*The suburb names according to the official government geographic names register are "Ferntree Gully" and "Upper Ferntree Gully".
--203.220.170.158 (talk) 14:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Ferntree Gully
Talk:Mitcham railway station, Melbourne

message: I will try to take some pictures, hopefully during construction and after. wai0004 talk 01:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sergei Starostin

message: I noticed that Starostin's article is a little small, so I've added some extra links relating to his proposed theories under the heading See Also. --Glengordon01 02:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Montmorency railway station, Melbourne

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was:  Even though participation in this RM is low, the consensus among those who have !voted is clear. DrStrauss talk 17:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Montmorency railway station, Victoria →  – The station is part of, and serviced by, the city's metropolitan railway network, Metro Trains Melbourne. This usually merits the articles disambiguation to the city it's located in, rather than the state/province. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · contribs · count) 08:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 July 2017
Talk:Werribee line

message: The track distances in the box at the bottom are clearly wrong. How can Williams Landing be closer to Flinders Street than Aircraft? 121.214.40.102 (talk) 12:33, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Early text

message: There is a new timetale for this line, and all Altona shuttles are extend to Flinders Street. Could someone add that piece of info?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techie3 (talk • contribs) 11:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Timetable for the Altona Branch. 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Sourcing appears in support of the originally proposed move. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  05:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Werribee railway line →  – WP:COMMONNAME swap with redirect ThylacineHunter (talk) 07:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: redirects are ineligible to be current titles in move requests, and there is no need to list the redirect, , to be swapped. A title swap will happen automatically if the :Werribee railway line article is moved as proposed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 July 2023 

message: Both this article and the Williamstown line article both suggest that the xtrapolis 2.0 are going to be introduced on both lines however there aren't any sources suggesting this. All sources I found (that include lines) only mention the Frankston, Craigieburn and Upfield lines
For some examples:
https://www.vic.gov.au/xtrapolis-modern-trains-modern-melbourne
https://www.railexpress.com.au/show-and-tell-for-xtrapolis-2-0-train-mock-up/
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/melbournes-newest-trains-track-ahead
Even the wikipedia article for the X'Trapolis 2.0 have no mention of the Werribee/Williamstown lines NotOrrio (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xtrapolis 2.0
Talk:WXPN

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Rtphokie 01:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the deletion was refused. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of [[:Template:{{ucfirst:WXPN}}]] 

message: --PennHelper  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PennHelper (talk • contribs) 17:06, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because WXPN-HD2 is a completely seperate station from WXPN. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 18:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there a reason WXPN and WXPN-HD2 are split? 

message: Though they share a common descendant the two stations have long been independent (30+ years) - WXPN is a professional NPR affiliate and WQHS is the student run station. They currently have no relation and should not be covered in a single article. The move in December 2011 to merge the 2 articles seems to have been made with no discussion or consensus. - AKeen (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split of WXPN and WQHS? 
Talk:Baxter railway station

message: An IP user, currently at 110.22.50.32, is obsessed with politics, and seems to insist on including it in every article he notices. His addition now of the virtually identical positions of the major parties on something for the future does not help the article. In the long term, all that will be in an article like this is electrification actually happening, not promises. You will note there is nothing in the article about the political promise to build the article in the first place. And they would have existed. Political point scoring doesn't belong here. HiLo48 (talk) 11:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the edits were made in good faith. However, the reference talks about the Frankston line, not the Baxter station as such, and therefore should not be included in the article. TeraTIX 13:25, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics
Talk:Williamstown line

message: @ThylacineHunter I'm finding it hard to finish the 20th century history subheading as there's limited information- would you know any good sources/sites/information that could be added to this section? Guidance/article edits would be much appreciated! HoHo3143 (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @HoHo3143 in the 19th century, include the Williamstown Workshops, then in the 20th, cover the major Williamstown yard that the site became. Try victorianrailways.net, there are track plans for the Williamstown yard that show the many companies that used it. Williamstown was a major departure point for grain & wool amongst other things. This line along with the Echuca line (Melbourne & Murray as the first company had in it's name) formed the backbone of the rail freight industry in the state. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 11:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  20th century history 

message: The page a a number of typos and MOS:CONTRACTIONS violations; see here for details. All the best, Miniapolis 14:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for this. I will be completing this later today. HoHo3143 (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completed a copyedit. Thanks for the feedback. HoHo3143 (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit needed 

message: I've started a discussion on Talk:Werribee_line#Xtrapolis_2.0 that is additionally relevant for this article NotOrrio (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xtrapolis 2.0
Talk:Upfield line

message: The Somerton to the Ford factory section is noted as being gauntlet track. I believe the difference is:
 ThylacineHunter (talk) 07:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauntlet track 
Talk:Newport railway station, Melbourne

message: I think under the "Services" bar on the right, Newport station should not be the terminus for the Altona Loop as on weekdays, they operate all the way to Flinders Street station. - Anonymous  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.39.96.226 (talk) 02:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox details
Talk:Oakleigh railway station

message: Need to add something about the murals at Oakleigh Station. They are one of its most remarkable features.
Mfgreen 06:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Took the initiative - and added some information on the murals. Will have to photograph some of them for Wikipedia.
Mfgreen 05:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Murals

message: I will be expanding the article over the coming week to help bring it up to a GA standard I will be using the caulfield station article has a base as it is a recently promoted GA-Article  NotOrrio (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: As per the recent review of the huntingdale station article I noticed many problems that were on this article has well. For a short period of time I will pull the article out of GA nomination and fix these problems once this is complete I wil renominate the article. These are relativley minor changes and the fixing won't take long (a few days at most). NotOrrio (talk) 04:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary GA-nomination removal
Talk:Roxburgh Park railway station

message: Feel free to update the images of Roxburgh Park
Made old ones into construction gallery feel free to remove if necessary
Adrian90 16:24, October 1 2007 (UTC)
:Done! --ozzmosis 08:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Macaulay railway station

message: Anyone else think we should have a photo of Macaulay before Citylink was placed over it?
Steamtostay (talk) 11:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo request 
Talk:Malvern railway station, Melbourne

message: Recently, I have been working on this article to improve it to Good Article status. To achieve this status, I have followed this guide. Upon completion, I have nominated this article for Good Article status on 21/12/2022. HoHo3143 (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article nomination 

message: @Marshelec I've gone and added some additional images in- it definitely makes the article betyter. Thanks to @Wongm for uploading the photos to Commons! HoHo3143 (talk) 10:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:J. Edgar Hoover Building

message: The article suggests that guided tours for the J Edgar Hoover FBI build ceased in 1999, however I took a guided tour in 2001.
Is there a source on this date?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnMikerson (talk • contribs) 04:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *It's been sourced and cited as ending in 2001 after 9/11. - Tim1965 (talk) 01:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Guided Tours

message: "The cornice line is 1,260 feet (380 m) high on the E Street side."  Really?  That seems really high.  --Shanedidona (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cornice line is 1,260 feet (380 m) high on the E Street side. 

message: From the last paragraph in the lede:
"By 2012, the J. Edgar Hoover Building was nearing the end of its useful lifespan, suffering from deterioration due to deferred maintenance and mediocre design."
A citation is needed for this statement. I have no reason to doubt it, but such a firm declarative statement cries out for back-up. 
Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''{{citation needed}}''' 

message: Injured 1983 money being stolen for the past 40 years.fuck the eye of San Pedro 166.199.171.35 (talk) 20:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Injury fraud past 40 years Raymond campa 

message: Injury fraud 166.199.171.35 (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunn Windsor baca haun pimintel fucken crooks
Talk:Sandringham line

message: The early private companies are a little confusing...
*Melbourne and Suburban Railway Company (MSRC) was sold to Melbourne Railway Company (MRC) on 31 March 1862
*Operations of St Kilda and Brighton Railway Company (StK&BRC) was taken over by MRC on 1 May 1862
*MRC amalgamated with Melbourne and Hobson's Bay Railway Company (M&HBRC) forming Melbourne and Hobson's Bay United Railway Company (M&HBURC) on 30 June 1865
*The StK&BRC still existed (without locomotives) until sold to the M&HBUR on 1 September 1865
-- ThylacineHunter (talk) 11:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early private companies 

message: The article says "The majority of stations are at ground level, with elevated or lowered stations constructed in conjunction with historical level crossing removals works." This may be true of Richmond, South Yarra and Elsternwick, but Balaclava and Gardenvale stations seem to be in their original locations even if bridges have been built north and south of Gardenvale, as far as I can tell from their articles.--Grahame (talk) 03:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevated stations

message: In relation to the above statement regarding the 19th-century section and reference to the Brighton line.
From 1859 to 1887 the Sandringham line was the Brighton line. The sections of the Sandringham line between Flinders Street and Brighton Beach are practically the original alignment (with minimal divergence as a result from line upgrades). Any mention of the "Brighton line" is therefore relevant to this line (or does every time a line gets extended/shortened mean we need to create a separate article?)
WP:RS for the early history of the line is a bit patchy due to the "revolving door" of the early private operators (4 before the governmental Victorian Railways took over). The fact most of these companies were only around for 3 years, and this was 158 to 164 years ago, there is not too much on the operations of these companies and what does exist and is easily accessible to general public is not from a RS. I hope to in the future to try and access the limited records on this time period located in the railway archives. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In response to failed GAN
Talk:Ferry Field

message: I'm a Big Ten football fan and 2005 MSU grad who lived in Ann Arbor for two years. Every morning I passed the old "Ferry Field" gates while walking to work. After a bit of research I decided to begin the Ferry Field wiki article, please edit as you will. AStudent 02:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: University of Michigan is not represented with a project at :Category:WikiProject Universities. Please comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  02:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Michigan Project
Talk:Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.

message: I propose that Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights be merged into Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.. I think that the content in the FAIR article can easily be explained in the context of Rumsfeld v FAIR, and the Rumsfeld article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of FAIR will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. S. Rich (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Marshall v. Marshall

message: Could someone rewrite this article in layman's terms? It is currently incomprehensible to non-lawyers. --Fang Aili talk 21:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrote it.  Travb (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is all legalese 

message: Did Howard K Stern actually argue this or was a competent attorney present?eRipley 03:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No. HKS has never argued anything in this case. 64.219.196.6 19:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discuss here
Talk:Albert Park and Lake

message: The comments made in this article about the Save Albert Park/Grand Prix do not appear to come from a neutral point of view.
Specifically, the comment that The protesters claimed that the race turned a public park into a private playground for a most of the year however when Premier Bracks Labour party also supported the Formula 1 Grand Prix race in the park SAP largely evaporated as it was largely, but not exclusively, a front group for the Labour(sic) party. contains an unreferenced opinion.  The SAP group, while existent, has probably lost relevance more in the face of the reality of the continuing GP event, rather than being a front for a political party - such a statement may possibly be defamatory, and as such should be referenced, if supported in verifiable works.Alexstj 04:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Someone might want to make an additional new article much in the format of this one, but, basing it on the emerging Sydney precinct that takes in Anzac Bridge, Glebe Island Rozelle Bay, Blackwattle Bay which includes a walk distance of approx. 5km. Path follows water's edge to (via Jubilee Park) Glebe Point and on to Blackwattle Bay Park, then Sydney Fish Market, Pyrmont etc. SignedJohnsonL623 (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rozelle Blackwattle Bays Walk, Sydney (suggested idea)
Talk:Burnley, Victoria

message: The boundaries for Burnley are reported differently in Google Maps and Victorian Mapping Data
In particular the northern boundary is on the railway line and part of Burnley park. The areas north of Swan St are in Richmond. The northern boundary then is not near Bridge Road.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.102.70 (talk) 06:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burnley Boundaries
Talk:Starcraft (horse)

message: Who the hell named him??
:I would presume the owners did. What's the problem with the name? - Cuddy Wifter 03:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe he's a fan of the StarCraft game? Cuddy, if you know the details, can you update the last sentence in Starcraft? It's a bit out of date. Moriori 04:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Cuddy Wifter 05:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one. Cheers. Moriori 06:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: so did someone un-update it? I think we all want to know was this horse a Starcraft (game) fan or merely into those old-school recreational vehicles... Spettro9 (talk) 17:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Box Hill railway station, Melbourne

message: The reason behind the merge is that the bus terminal, while major, is still pretty much part of the associated railway station and is not standalone. Thoughts? Wongm (talk) 04:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Just wondering whether it's just me, or whether the line referring to Box Hill as the only non city loop station to be underground still has any relevance?
With the completion of grade seperation projects at Gardiner, Nunawading; and soon to be completed at Ormond, McKinnion and Bentleigh, it has to be argued whether Box Hill can still be described as the only non loop station underground.
I also note Kogarah railway station on the Sydney Illawarra Line, which like Box Hill has a building built over it (in this case the station concourse and part of a shopping centre), is not described as underground - but merely "built over".
Just after some other opinions? -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 00:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only non-MURL station to be underground 
Talk:Camberwell railway station, Melbourne

message: To the editor who placed the 'unbalanced' tag on this section, please explain here so that others may respond to your views and improve the article. Eyedubya (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redevelopment controversy 
Talk:Box Hill Central

message: Whitehorse Plaza was an older shopping centre on the corner of Market and Main Streets.  When was it refurbished and renamed?  Should it be included on this page?
-- It was renovated in around 2003-4 from memory (not 2000 as the article claims) 124.190.98.224 (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitehorse Plaza 

message: Amongst many articles, I have spotted that there seems to be some confusion between which centre is North and which centre is South. Many articles refer to the shopping centres incorrectly (referring to Centro South as being the old Whitehorse Plaza).
As I know it, Centro Whitehorse is North (seeing as it is more north), and Centro Box Hill Central (the one with the railway station) is South. Some articles refer to this incorrectly by referencing the shopping centres vice-versa. This article refers to it correctly. I have corrected two occurrences of this error I've found - one at Box Hill, Victoria, and the other at List of shopping centres in Australia. --Ronnie M. 02:36, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference of North and South
Talk:Division of Chisholm

message: The map is out of date since the 2018 boundary changes. Will have a look for a fresh one next week unless anyone else sees this and has time to do it first.
Spoonriver (talk) 02:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map is out of date 
Talk:Blackburn railway station, Melbourne

message: The photo of Blackburn station is old, and the platforms have lumps and holes in them and the old painted line. They are now flat and have those bulging circle thingies instead of the yellow line. 
The photo makes Blackburn station look like a dump, and should be changed.
Also the photo should probably be from the lilydale line-facing end of platform 2, looking forward at platform 2, the entrace to the station, the two train tracks and platform 3.
I will also remove the image of the building on platform 3 as it is in a stupid place and a bad photo (It took me a while to figure out where it was taken from and I know the station quite well) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.127.73 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating photos on this page 