lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ashur

message: What about the Assyrian god?  The Jade Knight 05:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anshar is in there. --334 15:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: User:VolseniMack, this addition   isnb't mentioned in the linked article, so does not meet WP:DABMENTION and was removed. Please discuss here to gain consensus for you edit. Further, undoing this  removed the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC formatting. Please read WP:MOSDAB. Widefox; talk 18:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOSDAB 
Talk:Flavored liquor

message: *spiced rum is not a in the same category as flavored rum such as barcardi limon.  Spiced rum is just dark rum, spices are the normal ingredients, this distinction should be made.
:If you're saying that all dark rum has spices, I believe you're incorrect.  The darkness comes from caramel color or from the wood of the barrels, often toasted (like brandy).  Spiced rum is thus a flavored liquor.  Badagnani 05:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I beg to move that the article be moved to "Flavoured Liquor". -82.32.43.183 
:Why? -- Ari 18:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment:  If you write a non-culturally specific article on some subject, with a title containing a word that could be either in UK or U.S. spelling, you are free to spell it how you like, and no one will come to your article attempting to change it.  That's our policy.  Badagnani 17:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested page move-

message: There's already been some confusion over at Vodka infusion about the difference between flavouring and infusing, which is probably a result of the two being in separate articles, and not helped by some commercial versions of infusions using flavouring instead. I can't help feeling that there's a really good 'launchpad' article to be written that gives an overview of all drinks that have flavourings added to a distillate before bottling, so everything from gin (which admittedly gets redistilled), compound gin, sloe gin, flavoured vodkas, absinthe, bitters etc - or just go for broke and include the weaker drinks like the vermouths as well.  I'm not quite sure what you'd call such as article (aromatised wine is the official EU terminology for the vermouths and relatives, so Aromatised spirits??), but it feels like such an overview article is needed to clarify some of the different processes. FlagSteward 01:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merger. As to your suggestion, I think that would actually be a great article for over at Wikibooks Bartending  Guide. Are you familiar with the Bartending Task Force or the more active WikiProject Mixed Drinks? We'd love to have you join either or both groups. It helps to work together and talk amongst other people familiar with the subject matter. The groups have both been on a bit of a hiatus since several of the key Project members (including me) have been on WikiBreaks for a while. But I'm back and trying to get things energized again. --Willscrlt (Talk) 12:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I recommend that we try to find a picture that includes brands other than just Absolut as soon as possible. At the moment it just looks like an advertisement. DJAMP4444 12:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image - looks like an advertisement for Absolut Vodka
Talk:Japanese jazz

message: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/jan/12/how-japan-created-its-own-jazz Popcornfud (talk) 20:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref idea 

message: I am no expert on the subject, but as far as I am aware, it seems that the history of enka is closely tied up with the history of jazz in Japan. In fact there's a see also link to here in the "Late 1940s–1954" section. It seems like jazz and Tin Pan Alley pop ballads were inspiration for enka, and in turn, enka is sometimes covered by Japanese jazz artists, example. Zetagaming (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enka's relation to Japanese jazz
Talk:Beginner's luck

message: Hello, I would think another explanation might be that experienced players take it easy on beginners (perhaps even unconsciously). So they might unwittingly throw the game to the less experienced player.  But I don't have any sources for (or against!) this, and don't want to add original research.
Cheers,
VTPG (talk) 05:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: The article as it stands claims that slot machines which have recently been played extensively (without a jackpot) have a higher chance of producing a jackpot. I believe this is not actually a feature of any widely used slot machines (although there are machines where the value of the jackpot increases, that is not the point at issue) and claim therefore is simply a gambler's fallacy. As such I will remove the claim. 72.19.76.225 (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slot machines 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I am struggling to find ANY sources on this topic at all, although I have heard it anecdotally in my life. The only source I could find was the life-hacker article. However, that article links to the Wikipedia page in its lead section, and because of this I believe sourcing it as actually circular sourcing (because that article used Wikipedia as a source). Google scholar gave no results, neither did the multiple search engines I tried. I seems as if no scholarly work on this exists at all.
If anyone can find any sources at all, that would be greatly appreciated.
 Is this original research? (If it is, it is really well written.)
TheMickyRosen-Left (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you,  I wrote this almost a decade (!) ago, so I'm not sure. But I would guess that it is original research, given I didn't provide any sources. Cheers, Scientific29 (talk) 05:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: In some cultures a child is allowed to win early in an activity which would inforce an expectation that he or she is better at something in the beginning.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BradVesp (talk • contribs) 10:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Human Growth and Development
Talk:AOL search log release

message: The title of this article is "AOL search data leak". Both the term "search data" and the term "leak" are not quite right:
* It was not "search data", which could be many different things, but rather Web search queries in chronological order.
* It was not "leaked" -- which implies that the data release was unintentional or illicit.
This was an intentional (though misguided) release of search queries.
I propose to rename the page to AOL search query log release or AOL query log release. --Macrakis (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Leak?
Talk:Robert J. Art

message: The style of the current version of the article is questionable. Furthermore, for a person who does not already know Robert J. Art, this article is practically useless. Would somebody with sufficient knowledge of the subject please rewrite this article in a more encyclopaedic, neutral and accessible style? --Chino 05:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vermont Route F-5

message: I just edited this page to remove the recent change claiming this route was decommissioned in 2009.  Apologies for not leaving a better edit summary.  I accidentally hit the publish button too quickly.  Google street view shows that F5 signage was still present as recently as 2019.  It's possible that has been removed in the past couple years, but I doubt it because my 2022 VT toursim highway map also still labels this road with F5.  The previous change also said this road is "now known as County Road 3".  I assume this was a mix up between a County Road, which doesn't exist in Vermont, and a Town Highway, which does.  Ferry Road is, and always has been, Charlotte Town Highway 3 as well as Vermont Route F5.  However, town highway numbers are mostly for internal usage by the town highway departments are not prominently signed in most cases. -- Ezekielf (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 03:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @ As of 2017 this route still existed.  Unfortunately I've spent 30 minutes digging around the https://vtrans.vermont.gov/planning/maps site and couldn't come up with anything more concrete. You're welcome to dig around there and look for more data. --Rschen7754 03:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The more concrete information I have is that since my edit in June I've driven down this road and confirmed that the F5 signs are still there.  Since you didn't mention it, I'll assume you didn't visit this location in person last week to see if the signs are still there or not. -- Ezekielf (talk) 20:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, I don't doubt that the route still exists (though I am across the country) but unfortunately due to WP:NOR we need to source something else for the article. --Rschen7754 01:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm an OpenStreetMap (OSM) editor and not really much of a Wikipedia editor. I only edited this page because the statement that the route didn't exist anymore was being referenced as a reason to delete the route from OSM.  In OSM we encourage original research as the most reliable source.  I don't really care what this page says as long as it doesn't cause people think they should delete the route from OSM.  Feel free to reference the existence of the route in OSM as a source if you like 😀. -- Ezekielf (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be noted that in general (and this is not saying this is the case with this particular route, just noting this for the sake of thoroughness) that signage existing along a route is not necessarily indicative that a route continues to exist as a "live" obligation of the relevant organization. In some regions it's quite common for a route to be stricken from the books but signage remains in place for years or even decades. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 01:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not actually decommissioned in 2009
Talk:Louis Clark

message: The perils of forgetting to sign in! I added to his discography (IP: 89.240.82.87), using his official website as source. A quick search of Amazon reveals he's done a lot more, both with the Royal Philharmonic and with other orchestras - but I'll leave those until I'm sure of the album ID numbers. If anyone else wants to add any albums, feel free - after all, isn't that the point of Wikipedia? Mittfh (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Bò nướng lá lốt

message: No such food in Vietnam, please delete this 26 September 2006‎ 80.47.235.45 (talk)‎ . . (43 bytes) (+43)‎
:Well.. now moved, sources provided, expanded. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Joseph R. Garber

message: should we have an article on vertical run? Wandavianempire (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  vertical run
Talk:IronPort

message: Joyous! | Talk 20:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 Titusmars (talk) 12:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since there has been no opposition to your suggestion, I think you are free to merge as you described. Joyous! | Talk 06:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks. ArcticSnowWind (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Joyous! I found the IronPort large mention on Cisco page, so no need to add extra information there. I think the can be merged/redirected. ArcticSnowWind (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Cisco Systems
Talk:IFF

message: IIf does not really fit in here, right? Give me some arguments, why it should stay - and it can stay. Otherwise I will remove it. 
Hi.ro 05:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I tried....  Per the style guidelines for common misspellings on disambig pages, I added this under a "see also" heading.  Wangi seemed to disagree rather strongly and reverted my change.  I've asked him about this on his talk page, and hopefully after hearing back we can resolve this.  -Quintote 03:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whew, we're passed this.  Wangi had simply misread the IIf and IFF, quite easy to do, and has removed it.  I would've been okay with a "See also", but as long as it's not listed in there I'm good with it. ;-)  -Quintote 13:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IIf? 

message: I have re-added all the erased links bij User:Wangi, because I did not quite agree with his method of working. Before "cleaning up" this disambiguition page, I propose Wangi to ask this first on the talk page. I do not follow his opinion. The more relevant links on a dis.p., the more relevant the dis.p. What do the others feel about this ? Berchemboy 11:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wangi did make some radical changes, but I'd rather not see things devolve into an edit war.  I removed some of those links you added back.  One of them, "In Flanders Fields, a freedom-loving flamingant weblog and webzine," not only sounded like an advertisement for a blog, but linked to the In Flanders Fields article, which is about the poem, not the blog. -Quintote 03:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 November 2006
Talk:Liu Yao (warlord)

message: This article is pretty bad. I'd clean it up myself, but don't have much time to translate Liu Yao's SGZ biography.
The name in the introduction is mentioned to be 'Liu Zhou', which is obviously incorrect. I am not qualified to change it to Liu Yao, as I do not know which intonation of 'yao' is used in his name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.252.248 (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joi (band)

message: This article is strange... Should this be a disambiguation page? --Storkk 05:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite tag
Talk:Spanish East Indies

message: In the early period of Spanish colonization in the Philippines, Spanish outposts in the Moluccas and Formosa (Taiwan) were governed from Manila. I assume that would qualify them as part of the Spanish East Indies. If so, they should be mentioned in the article.
--Rbraunwa 05:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moluccas and Formosa 

message: It can be seen in this file map"  that the Scarborough Shoal and a part of the Spratlys are within the territorial limits of Spanish East Indies. Hope somebody can try to dig the archives for the Spratlys and incorporate the info in this article or to the related articles on the Spratlys. Jordz (talk) 08:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spratlys and Scarborough 

message: Since the Spanish East Indies ceased to exist is 1898, I fail to see the relevance of including information about current date.  For instance the "today" flags recently added to the infobox.  And the final paragraph is fairly irrelevant too.  John of Cromer in China Philippines (talk) mytime= Sat 20:08, wikitime=  12:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of information about current date 
Talk:Decima Moore

message: A category should not be added unless text and references are added to the article that show that the category is appropriate.  The article suggested in this case apparently shows only that Moore successfully asserted that she is was not a single woman, and thus was not subject to the single woman's tax.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Giovanni Domenico Ferretti

message: Check on "Sebastiano Ricci", I had to guess at what the structure of that sentence was supposed to be.Djcartwright 06:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; I checked the Italian and found nothing pertinent that I could add.  I'm striking it out for now to be added later. 06:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bamboccianti

message: I'm pretty sure that "picaresque" is an error for "picturesque". --Wetman 06:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not so sure. Brouwer's paintings do not conform to my idea of picturesqueness. Let's hope that User:CARAVAGGISTI will explain his meaning. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Justicia lanstyakii

message: This is a valid species, but its original source is hard to pinpoint. Feel free to reference this page: https://www.ipni.org/n/132961-2, which is from the International Plant Names Index. It gives the name of the original source, but it does not appear to have been converted to electronic form. Liketolearnthings (talk) 01:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valid Article
Talk:Lemon basil

message: African Basil should probably be something like Ocimum gratissimum
69.91.93.154 15:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A google search for "Thai lemon basil" (which only shows up Ocimum × citriodorum as results) has 41,600 hits, whereas a google search for "Lao basil" shows 1,030 hits. It would seem that "Thai lemon basil" is a much more common name in English than "Lao basil" and therefore merits inclusion into the article more than "Lao basil". - Takeaway (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai lemon basil and Lao basil
Talk:Monarda citriodora

message: Someone looking over my shoulder says that the "Medical Remedy" section here is about lemon balm, Melissa officinalis which is not to be confused with Monarda... I don't have the time or knowledge to fix it. 75.130.233.149 (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemon balm?
Talk:Vestigial response

message: Vestigial responses in humans are really fascinating. It's amazing that new discoveries reminiscent of our ancient past can still be made.
This article seriously needs some work if it is going to convincingly remain here. Something it could include could be the goose bump response to fear, but not the response to cold which is still slightly serving its original purpose, at least for hairy people :-) However, I don't have any sources which talk about that. We really need someone with some good books/papers on vestigial responses to give us some info and cites, otherwise I don't see the point of this article existing as anything other than a redirect to Vestigial Structure. Skittle 14:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Preimplantation genetic haplotyping

message: Page not found:  (PGH Press Release) - removed from article. --apers0n 11:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I reworded the introduction of this technique from "using DNA fingerprinting rather than identifying the actual genetic signature (such as point mutations)" to "dentifies a haplotype of genetic markers that have statistical associations to a target disease rather than identifying the mutation causing the disease". Please give me a message at my talk page if you think this is wrong, since I don't want to go around with the wrong idea in my mind. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly incorrect by me? 

message: I moved the following entry to here, because I think it needs further explanation on how this would be unique to PGH. Why would it not be possible to screen male embryos by "conventional" PGD? Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniqueness of screening male embryos?
Talk:Constantin Ion Parhon

message: I'm quite sure all the ashes were transferred out of the mausoleum after the Revolution. Where is he buried now? Biruitorul 06:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surinam Airways Flight 764

message: There's a discrepancy in the number of fatalities. The article currently says 176 with 11 survivors, which is supported by sources like ASN. But the final report, or at least the reproduction available in ICAO Circular 262 , Section 3.2 Injuries to Persons lists the total fatalities as 178, with 9 survivors. It also says in Section 3.15 Survival Aspects, "15 survivors where pulled from the wreckage of whom 7 (seven) died later. One child was found outside the wreckage". I assume the child wasn't included with the 15 survivors from the wreckage, otherwise there would be a discrepancy within the final report itself of either 8 or 9 survivors. Is it possible that the count is often reported as 176 because two more survivors died days, weeks, or even months after that number was first reported? Interestingly, the NTSB brief of accident on June 7, 1989 lists 174 fatalities , and an NTSB recommendation published on April 24, 1990 states "Only 11 persons survived the accident; 175 persons were fatally injured". The later doesn't even match up with the number of occupants, which is otherwise consistently 187, although it does suggest the investigation was still ongoing at the time of its publication. Any help in finding sources to solve this discrepancy would be appreciated. LearyTheSquid (talk) 23:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy
Talk:Nucleus pulposus

message: What does pulposus mean in latin?
It means "flesh." Source:  JohnJohn 01:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The nucleus is jelly-like in its youth, and becomes pulpy (like over-boiled oatmeal) in old age.  Therefore the term "nucleus pulposus" is correct only in old age. Santamoly (talk) 05:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What
Template talk:US National Guard by state

message: Fifty links, all redirects back to the only page where this template is used. I would hope somebody is planning on making some of these articles soon. Danthemankhan 06:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It looks like some of them existed at one time and were all redirected back. Chris 20:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks

message: *Doesn't Guam have a few National Guard units as well? 156.98.187.230 (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Guam

message: I see that the historical, but very short lived, Philippine National Guard is given no mention here. --207.114.206.48 (talk) 04:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added it. bahamut0013♠♣  12:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --207.114.206.48 (talk) 03:11, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Philippines
Talk:Médaille militaire (France)

message: :Non-English language awards
:The basic rule is that the names of foreign-language awards should be translated into English except where there is an established track-record of referring to it by its foreign-language name. Therefore we use Iron Cross in favour of "Eiserne Kreuz", Pour le Mérite in favour of "For the Merit" or "Merit Award", and Param Vir Chakra in favour of "Bravest of the Brave Award". This effectively means that the article will reside at the customary English-language name. Having said this, editors are encouraged to create redirects for all reasonable permutations and variations on the name, whether in English or in the native language.
:There is no such record of referring to this award by its French name, the title was thus translated into English and should remain as such. Fdutil (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Rubbish. This award is almost never translated into English by reliable sources. It was awarded to many (non-French-speaking) Allied servicemen during the First World War in particular - it always appears in the English-language record in its original form. For two of many examples, see:  and . -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: QUOTE FROM WIKIPROJECT ODM