lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James C. Morton

message: Responding to this edit summary, merely appearing in films does not establish notability. This article needs to do a better job of explaining why Morton is anything but a bit player. --Dhartung | Talk 18:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a fair point, I guess.  I don't see how he's any less notable than the dozens of character/voice actors of the modern era though.  I will look to find some more references! Lugnuts (talk) 07:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Alicia Craig

message: I feel that this article is valid and worthy of remaining on Wikipedia.  Alicia Craig was the best distance runner in the NCAA for two years.  When a man is elected to be a Heisman Trophy winner it is because he is the best College football player.  Is there a different standard for football than for track and field?  I'm sure all the Heisman trophy winners are listed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyorunner (talk • contribs) 
:Please assume good faith and don't insinuate other editors are acting in a prejudicial manner. --ZimZalaBim talk 13:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the results be on the TALK page, for future reference?Ryoung122 09:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD info
Talk:Jones v. City of Opelika

message: I propose that Jones v. City of Opelika (1942) and Jones v. City of Opelika (1943) be merged into Jones v. City of Opelika (which is currently a redirect to the first case). The 1943 decision was a rehearing and reversal of the 1942 decision, so the two articles describe the same case.  The 1943 article is a stub.  Both decisions can be explained in a single article. LegalSkeptic (talk) 02:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the assumption that the convention is to have one article for every notable decision of the SCOTUS.  If the members of the SCOTUS WikiProject are amenable to allowing one article to cover two decisions, I will withdraw my objection.  --Pseudo-Richard (talk) 06:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Example of one article covering two decisions: Brown v. Board of Education - there were actually two decisions, Brown I, and Brown II.  Brown II is covered in a subheading of the article.  I would also like to hear more opinions on this from people in the wikiproject.  LegalSkeptic (talk) 03:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Token money

message: the coin should be rolled over at the server in an exchange for a fresh coin Rolled over? Whatever does that mean?
:Perhaps the coin goes into the slot and then a different coin with the same value comes out immediately.--Felix folio secundus 20:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Token coin is just a form of token money. Given the quality, size and overlap in the articles these topics would be better handled in one article. Jonpatterns (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that token money is more of an economics-related article, and token coin is more of a numismatics-related article. StAnselm (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure there is a meaningful distinction. While numismatics is often thought of as the study of physical money, its article claims it is also the broader study of money and its development and methods to resolve debt (which includes digital money). This is economics. Jonpatterns (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Token coin 

message: “Token money costs less to produce than its face value.” I checked the the accuracy of the citation, and the definition is as such in the Routledge Dictionary of Economics. Nevertheless, it may be imprecise as the consequence is a bit absurd. Cacophonous-Earth (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  US one-cent piece is not a token
Talk:Federation of Young European Greens

message: Means Sharp Green.Xx236 (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ostra Zieleń 
Talk:Douglas Knehans

message: Those wishing to keep the content of this article, need to include citations throughout.  Also, we should not include bogus information, such as:
:2005	Nominated International Professional of the Year Cambridge: International Biographical Centre, 2005
The International Biographical Centre will "honour" anybody who'll fork over the money to buy their publications.  It's a disagrace that Wikipedia would include this, as though it were a legitimate academic honour.  A number of other honours mentioned in the article are equally bogus.  That's what happens when you let people write their own biography, and don't require reliable independent sources be cited.  Rather than requiring me to find all the bogus ones and remove them, it makes more sense for those wanting inclusion, to cite the legitimate claims, and for us to remove anything that's not cited with a reliable independent source.    --Rob (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  bogus "Citations" and lack of sources 
Talk:RyanDan

message: Is this true?  The reference link doesn't seem to point to anything...and I believe The Proclaimers would have been there first in 1988 with Sunshine on Leith which went to no. 6 according to everyhit.co.uk
Bxn1358 (talk) 17:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the citation as it is highly doubtful. werldwayd (talk) 00:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "first identical-twin duo to have a top-ten album on the British charts." 

message: We have had Imagine as a prospective sophomore album. I even have the tracklist as "Imagine" (4:05)
"Believer" (3:53)
"Open Arms" (3:32)
"Beyond the Blue" (4:00)
"Take It to the Grave" (3:58)
"Blameless" (4:02)
"What If" (3:22)
"I'll Be" (4:03)
"Break the Silence" (4:08)
"Roads" (3:57)
Yet no trace of the album. Any updates on this or shall we remove Imagine altogether? werldwayd (talk) 08:01, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates on prospective RyanDan album ''Imagine''?
Talk:Pack goat

message: I suggest that Pack goat and Goat packing be merged. Biscuittin 12:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That has obviously been , as it redirects here. duff 05:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

message: This is a great topic and it needs stronger citations.  Packgoat.com is a blog.  Have not yet dug into the others.  I'm going to work on converting the inline-offsite refs to proper citations and will be seeking reliable sources. duff 05:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation strength
Talk:Attitude Adjustment

message: Please consider somehow combining the line ups described in the summary and the lists of line ups. Also, the "best line up" contains bias within the title. Consider revising. Ki85squared (talk) 08:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Combining Line Ups

message: Attitude Adjustment (band) → Attitude Adjustment — The articole Attitude Adjustment redirects to Attitude Adjustment (band), so there's no need for the "band" specification. CapPixel (talk) 14:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Steven Nissen

message: There are numerous voices warning about possible Nissen's conflict of interest. 
https://intensivedietarymanagement.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/COI5.jpg
These must be included in the Wikipedia article so that the article is objective.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:1109:2D00:ACF6:FC9C:FA23:BA10 (talk) 19:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious allegations for conflict of interest must be included in the Wikipedia article

message: As typical for some WP:BLP, Wikipedia's coverage of influential scientists intensifies from when their name started appearing in news sources.
Steven Nissen is now known for the ASSTEROID trial (no reference here yet) and much work on IVUS (no reference). But his work on drug safety gets most attention.
In other words: we need expansion. JFW | T@lk 12:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Per your comments above - I added the ASTEROID trial and also added citations throughout.  I also checked with Dr. Nissen to make sure I had the correct citations - let me know if you have additional comments or changes - thank you.
--HeartRN (talk) 20:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the VERY lengthy proposed page rewrite because (A) much of the appropriate, proposed material is now in the article, (B) the user proposing the changes was blocked from further edits due to violating Wikipedia's commercial promotion policy (he/she has been reinstated, but some of the proposed edits did reflect a bias, consistent with his/her work at Dr. Nissen's institution), and (C) because the length was simply cluttering this article's talk page.DoctorEric (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Would like to make the following edits to Dr. Steven Nissen's Page 

message: This article is more of a fan page than a Wikipedia article. Let's see some discussion of Dr. Nissen's conflicts of interest (e.g. Business Week, 19 December 2005, "Big Pharma's Favorite Gadfly: Steven Nissen's industry ties don't stop him from questioning drugs like Celebrex." Also: see new book by Robert Goldberg (from Center for Medicine in the Public Interest): Tabloid Medicine. 71.202.127.216 (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I do agree the article appears to lack balance. I will look into Dr. Nissen's bio further and make changes to the article, if appropriate. DoctorEric (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fan Page?
Talk:Beliefs and theology of the Nation of Islam

message: I removed the following unsourced text: 
:Equally unorthodox is the claim that a true prophet can be sent after Muhammad. One of the earliest believers was Bilaal, an emancipated Ethiopian slave, but neither he nor did the Persian Salman form any political or religious parry.
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad is viewed as "the last and greatest messenger of Allah", but not a prophet. The information about brothers Bilaal and Salman are now somewhat superfluous so I removed them as well. Rag-time4 12:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prophet after Muhammad(peace be upon him)?

message: The article on the Nation of Islam has a more detailed comparison with traditional Islam, and it is better sourced. This article lacks citations from reliable sources, which are supposed to be third-party sources, not just the words of one or two leaders of the group.Parkwells (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison with Islam

message: — Assignment last updated by Allicyn.h (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions
Talk:Volkswagen Polo Mk3

message: "The Volkswagen Polo Mk3 is the third generation of the Volkswagen Polo supermini, produced from 1994 until late 1999 and some in 2000. It was produced in two forms, the initial car (1994–2000) being known as the Mark 4 or IIII, and the facelifted version (2000–2002) known as the Mark 4 Phase II[1] or unofficially as the Mark 3F or IIIF."
If it is the Polo Mk3, why is it known as the Mark 4? Can someone who knows please clarify this section? 94.192.80.66 (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

message: Production and sale numbers don't make sense in this section of the article. Can anyone clarify? <B>Warren</B> (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What doesn't make sense about them? Presumably they were all made in the UK and then sold throughout Europe, with only a relatively small proportion being sold into the UK market. 46.65.127.58 (talk) 01:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polo Harlequin 

message: 1.0 engine code AEV HelpMeChoose55 (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine code suggestion?
Talk:Hu Fang

message: Hu Fang has a website which shows (I assume) his name in Chinese characters.  See http://www.hufangwrites.com. If any editor has the knowledge to add these to the article, that would be great.  Thanks.  Hallucegenia (talk) 10:16, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: ► Philg88 ◄ ♦talk 08:16, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help requested with Chinese characters
Talk:List of mammals of Poland

message: Hi, guys. That list is completely outdated. If someone have time, visit Polish version of the article (don't worry, there are scientific, Latin names) and see how many species are in Poland recently. In 20 century 110 species were noted, not 89!
In fact, there were 111 species in historical times (since A.D. 1500). I improved the article, adding missing species and literature  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.206.178.22 (talk) 20:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi. What records are there (strandings/sightings) of sei whales in Polish waters? They are vagrants in the Baltic Sea (only a few records in Denmark and northern Germany, including the type specimen), so any records for Poland (if they exist) would only involve extralimital records. Haven't found any in a quick google search. Any help would be nice. SHFW70 (talk) 23:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Records of sei whales 
Talk:Stephanie Jacobsen

message: Box on the right says Australia, text says Hong Kong, which is it?
:I removed the Hong Kong wikiproject. Though she may have been born there, she is not a Hong Kong celebrity or otherwise notable in that region -- specifically, it's unlikely that the HK wikiproject would have more interest in this biography than what a general editor would have. The bio and Australia projects provide sufficient coverage and are the most relevant. Ham Pastrami (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HK v Australia
Category talk:Cambodian people of Chinese descent

message: Hey there, I saw that you added :Category:Chinese Cambodians to the Lon brothers. Well, the Lon family is a subcategory of Chinese Cambodians, and I see that there is no need to co-place them ib the higher category. If you add them to both, then whats the purpose of the subcategory that I created? Perhaps you might want to see Wikipedia:Categorization for some guidelines on categorisation, or if you think so otherwise, feel free to explain why. Thanks. (For User:Utc-100, message was also posted on his talk page.) Mr Tan 13:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Lon family]]
Talk:Show'N Tell

message: Mine, a 70's model, only had two speeds and a neutral setting. MMetro 13:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @MMetro Could you take a pic of it? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Four speeds?
Talk:Rocket (band)

message: :I have an image, but I'm really slow and don't understand the guidelines, and if someone would like to add it to the article that'd be great. I'd rather not get in trouble. From left to right: Lauren C., Chelsea, Kristin, Peaches, and Lauren. This was found on their facebook: . Image:  98.206.23.154 (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for , or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation. 
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.
To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case.
Happy Editing! —  21:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice: This article does not [[WP:Verifiability|verifiably]] establish {{ #switch: {{lc:Music}}
| academics = [[WP:PROF]]
| biographies = [[WP:BIO]]
| people = [[WP:BIO]]
| companies = [[WP:CORP]]
| groups = [[WP:CORP]]
| fiction = [[WP:FICTION]]
| movies = [[WP:MOVIE]]
| music = [[WP:MUSIC]]
| schools = [[WP:SCL]]
| web = [[WP:WEB]]
| proposed = [[WP:N]]}}

message: I have removed the :Category:Flagged articles from
the message above 
… it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, 
but the current version looks fine to me. Avicennasis @ 03:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Flagged articles]]
Category talk:Villages in West Lothian

message: There are a fair number of settlements missing. By analogy with the Rambot stubs and English geography, these should probably have articles, be they ever so modest.
* Bridgend, West Lothian
* Ochiltree, West Lothian
* Ecclesmachan
* Champany, West Lothian
* Threemiletown
To be continued. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 13:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing according to the Gazetteer
Talk:Alderbrook (horse)

message: Who died ? A horse ? It is an animal not a person.
YES! Well Done! I have seen several of your edits about how, it is a Horse and not a person. Wikipedia is not set for people it is a encyclopedia. So do us a favor and stop editing with stupid comments. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead horse  

message: Quite well-written, detailed coverage but NO refs. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Praskolesy

message: please mark this as "resolved" if the incoming links are cleaned up
There are several links to this disambiguation page that need attention.  Links in hatnotes to this page assist in navigation, but links in main article text tend to confound readers and should be changed to point directly at the relevant article.  For other disambiguation pages with incoming links, see Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to this page
File talk:MacbethTree.png

message: Hey, nice work. You need to correct some of the genitives being presented as nominatives here (were you reading a genealogy?). Dub, gen. Duib, Cináed, gen. Cináeda, so Dub mac Duib,  Cináed mac Cináeda, not  Cináeda mac X or Duib mac X. Also, "mac Donnchad" should be "mac Donnchada". Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 13:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Paul Gerard Smith

message: I see No basis for the spelling "Girard" and plenty for "Gerard". The spelling "Girard" seems to be entirely based on IMDb, which is not a reliable source. Even IMDb says: "Born Paul Gerard Smith" but then doesn't explain when or why he changed the spelling of his middle name (his grandson Paul G. Smith III changed it??) – I'm therefore reverting the cut-paste move of 4 November 2007‎. – wbm1058 (talk) 17:08, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Separate system

message: Great new article! I'd recommend adding another source or two, expanding a bit, then nominating for a Did You Know? on the front page within a few days! --Midnightdreary 14:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New article!

message: Should the Philadelphia System be merged here, or is it different? 141.151.2.144 (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Philadelphia System is more properly called the "Pennsylvania System" and was first implemented in Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia. See the addition to the article.--DThomsen8 (talk) 01:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Philadelphia System]] 

message: Needs a section on results.  Studies have shown people in solitary confinement suffer terribly and can be driven to depression and suicide as a result.--Parkwells (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Results or impact
Talk:History of cricket in South Africa from 1990–91 to 2000

message: Please discuss at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket#Notability_of_Test_tours AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on splitting Australian cricket team in South Africa in 1993–94 and other Tests from this article
Talk:Pogača

message: Why is Tomato pie listed under See also? It is also bread-like and made in the oven, but so are many things, like pizza, chapati, simit, brioche, and wagafi bread.  --Lambiam 14:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tomato pie 

message: Merged with pogacha  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denereri (talk • contribs) 18:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged 

message: Cherry pup/kernelbbitter sweet 193.222.252.30 (talk) 01:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malhalup
Talk:Kurenivka mudslide

message: THere dont seem to be any refs to english articles...
Have assessed as low importance and left stub for this reason
Chaosdruid (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 
Talk:Cossack host

message: This article should have a map. Benjamin (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A map of what? - Altenmann >talk 18:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The land areas the different hosts occupied. Benjamin (talk) 04:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine

message: Isn´t independence the same as state sovereignity? There is another article which states that that Ukraine became independent on 24 August 1991. --Vitzque (talk) 12:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, sovereignty and independence are somewhat different. Enivid (talk) 06:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And what is the difference? How can they be sovereign if they are not independent? --Vitzque (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sovereignty#Sovereignty_and_independence.Enivid (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independence?  

message: The computer (at a College Library) timed-out to Reference 2 in the Wikipedia Article.
However, a  English version of the Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine is at:
   https://www.usubc.org/site/recent-news/road-to-independence--declaration-of-state-sovereignty-of-ukraine-on-july-16--1990
and has the statement quoted in Reference 2:
"The Ukrainian SSR solemnly declares its intention of becoming a permanently neutral state that does not participate in military blocs and adheres to three nuclear free principles: to accept, to produce and to purchase no nuclear weapons."
I find no reference to being neutral or non-aligned or not particpat8ing in military blocs in the Ukrainian Declaration of Independence or the first Ukrainian Constitution of 1996.
Doesn't this show that there were differences of opinions on this subject?  
Research question: Are (were) there polls that reflected public opinion on the topic of alignment during the period (July 1990 - coup overthrowing the Yanukovych Presidency) and subsequently prior to the recognition by Russia of the Donetsk and Luhansk Peoples' Republics in 2014? Nourusoff (talk) 20:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was just a deception by the Ukrainian nationalists. Of course, they wanted to join NATO because of the anti-Russian sentiment. But at first they tried to hide it. 95.25.23.115 (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Ukraine intend to become a neutral state with no military alliances?