Talk:The X-Files: I Want to Believe/Archive 1

message: According to this site:
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=38875
The movie now has the green light, shooting to start on December 10th 2007. So can this page be re-instated? Gaunt 17:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. But as we all know, something, anything could halt or delay shooting; therefore, in accordance with the notability guidelines for films, the article should not be recreated until filming is confirmed to have started. Best regards, Steve T  • C 20:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green light at last? 

message: I don't see how it does any harm. It's just to inform people that the userbox exists, in case they want to put it in their user page. It's out of the way, up by the banners. If it bothers you that much I'm fine with it not being here, I just don't see the harm. Equazcion •✗/C • 06:25, 5 Jan 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that you have good intentions, but offering the userbox as something to incorporate on one's user page is not conducive for the article.  Perhaps I'm heavy-handed when it comes to content that does not do anything for the article, but I'm wary of general discussions on talk pages, particular for topics that have some kind of fan base.  I've watched articles like Transformers and The Dark Knight, and they tend to get general comments often.  I'm not trying to censor the existence of the userbox, but I don't believe that it needs to be attached to the talk page.  My impression is that userboxes tend to be viral unless they're task-based, at which they can be announced at the appropriate talk pages (WikiProjects, RC Patrol, etc).  Perhaps if someone unaware of the talk page guidelines comes here and says something about the film, the comment could be removed and a nice note could be left on the person's talk page mentioning the userbox. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 06:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Userbox 

message: many sites mention him wanting to appear in the film....shouldn't that be added to the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.118.226 (talk) 02:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No? We don't care what "many" sites supposedly want. I'd like to point out that out of these supposedly many sites, you have listed exactly zero. Dlong (talk) 02:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can do whatever you want as long as it is necessary to the article and you have a good source.Blackngold29 (talk) 03:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Robert Patrick and Annabeth Gish will not be appearing in the sequel. Source. --GSK (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  robert patrick? 

message: There are travel sheets for the film which list "Mitch Pileggi and family". So it looks like he'll be in it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Beavis (talk • contribs) 00:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's wait to ensure a lock-in.  I don't really doubt his appearance, but it can't be determined how the filmmakers want the film to be played out.  Even someone having filmed scenes doesn't guarantee their appearance. For example, Johnny Knoxville's role was edited out of Killshot.  I don't think we need to be in a hurry here, considering that it's not of utmost importance to list every actor this early on. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skinner