lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Immunodeficiency

message: I've been making some significant changes to this page.  Mainly, creating a comprehensive list of primary immunodeficiencies,organized by the immune cell type they are related to. Some organizing principle seems necessary since the term "Immunodeficiency" covers such a wide variety of pathology.
I don't really see the point in having a whole separate page devoted to primary immunodeficiency, seems pedantic.  It seems like having one page that's sort of a portal to the various types of primary and secondary immunodeficiencies makes more sense.  Thoughts on this anyone? OsteopathicFreak 23:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments 

message: what is the opposite of immunocomprimised? like a person with a "normal" immune system. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.215.4.48 (talk) 21:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  opposite of immunocomprimised is? 

message: some estimation of how common immunodeficiencies are in the general population would be a nice addition - will add if I come across something Pengortm (talk) 05:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: how common

message: How is immunodeficiency treated? 220.253.199.134 (talk) 05:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment

message: Immunosuppression is basically the same as the "secondary" immunodeficiency on this page.  I think a merge would be appropriate because it would result in a single, unified source of full information.  Does anyone else have any thoughts?
(Note that Immunosuppressant, the thing being used to create secondary immunodeficiency, and Immunosuppressive drug also exist.)  WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:27, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess not. Best, A Sniper (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently neutral here. Reasons towards a support include that both immunodeficiency and immunosuppression may refer to deliberately and non-deliberately caused ones (immunosuppression is a major pathogenic mechanism of AIDS), and the effects are basically the same. It's better to have one article that gives a clear picture, rather than the confusingly many articles on the subject as it is now (with Immunodeficiency, Immunosuppression, Immunosuppressant, Immunosuppressive drug...). On the other hand, immunosuppression appears to deal mainly with secondary immunodeficiency, with the latter only focusing on the negative aspects. I'll try to describe it in the articles. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tried to make a description regarding the relations between immunodeficiency and immunosuppression, and, as it is now, I don't think a merge is needed. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Immunosuppression]] 

message: Immunodeficiency 2600:1700:CC0:31E0:3E60:535D:13CA:3CBE (talk) 03:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microbiology 

message: — Assignment last updated by JPH2002 (talk) 20:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Bio 401 Cell Biology S2024
Talk:Croats in Slovakia

message: I think that this fails Wikipedia:Notability. Checkin' it. --PaxEquilibrium 23:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no politics here, it's notability is very questionable as I've heard nothing precisely what makes it notable. We could also make Chinese of Slovakia, I met one from there - right? A Serbs of Slovakia article is even more precisely non-notable, completely out of the question. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an autochthonous minority dating back to the 15th century, which despite it's small size, gets frequent mention in many sources. --Thewanderer (talk) 23:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any notable individual? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the current President of Slovakia Ivan Gašparovič is of Croat descent.Kebeta (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Liverpool City Council

message: This page is obviously written by a Labour Party supporter. Needs to be significantly more NPOV. Fig 23:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I myself am left-wing but felt that the overall tone of the article was not neutral enough by Wikipedia's standards. More citations and balance are needed 
206.165.101.124 12:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: There is a redirect for Lord Mayor of Liverpool but apparently nothing in the article about him or her.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Mayor

message: This page could do with taking some of the information from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_City_Council_elections and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liverpool_Town_Council_elections David Jeffery (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve links to other relevant pages 

message: I noticed the link to Mary Rasmussen was redirecting to a deceased American musician, so I removed it.
TDK1881 (talk) 23:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary Rasmussen
Talk:Secondarily aquatic tetrapods

message: What about sea otters? 75.83.150.164 (talk) 06:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be mentioned. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Penguins too.Steve Dufour (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A
Talk:Dacotah Field

message: Does anyone have a source for the stadium size?  Also, the original Dacotah field was where the union is now.  It was the former Dacotah field, not the location next to the BSA  --NDState 05:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 
Talk:Andy Hamilton (darts player)

message: On his way to the semi-finals he overcame one of 'The Powers' oldest rivals, Dennis Priestley and the hugely talented Mark Dudbrige.
* Need an apostrophe 'The Powers' - not sure how to integrate it while continuing to use apostrophes around the nickname.
* More importantly: did he overcome two of The Power's old rivals?  Just one?  Which one was a rival?  Help me, I'm confused.  --JohnRDaily 00:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: Anyone able to crop the three dudes out of the picture? Some might wonder, who of those he is. -Koppapa (talk) 20:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it. -Koppapa (talk) 21:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Magnolia Bakery

message: My city (in Asia) also has bakeries.. How come this one is special???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.213.172 (talk) 13:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  no place for bakeries in Wikipedia 

message: It seems like the bakery wrote this themselves; the phrasing especially is like and ad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.209.234 (talk) 21:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads Like an Advertisement 

message: The article belongs here; it's a very notable bakery. BUT this article as it is right now reads like a blog post. Did Julie Powell write it, by any chance? Pleeease, someone, clean it up and make it Wikipedic!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.101.91 (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barf
Talk:Wal (bass)

message: The remark that Pete's busy servicing existing intruments, etc. lacks a reference.  2404 00:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pete's Current Status?

message: Neither of the inline references work as the two domains vintagebass.com and thedudepit.com no longer exist. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 13:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and references
Talk:Mount Tabor, New Jersey

message: Large parts of this article are not written in an encyclopedic tone appropriate for Wikipedia. Particularly in the latter sections on the history, with sentences like "A contract was entered into with Parsippany-Troy Hills Township, and this is how we get our water today. Now the water tower in St. John's park functions only as a reminder of our past" and "Many houses and buildings were not maintained as well as they should have been, and rebellious youth made their presence known. Fortunately, this trend has been reversed in the last decades, and an appreciation for the past has become strongly evident" read more like a personal essay and reflection rather than an encyclopedia article.
While the article contains a lot of interesting information, it is poorly sourced and almost entirely lacking any in-line citations, despite the many specific numbers, dates, and facts asserted throughout.
The whole thing is in need of a proper rewrite, but like many of the more obscure articles on Wikipedia, pages like this tend to go largely unnoticed and ignored ("low-importance" as they say), so it may be years, if ever, that an article like this receives editorial attention.
I don't know how to tag articles for problems, and would have just done that instead (and there are countless others that really should be as well but won't because someone decided they are low-importance). So oh well, hopefully someone competent sees this and takes on the challenge. And Wikipedia should really allow tagging to be done in a simple manner, if they care about quality at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.200.134 (talk) 08:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written and sourced
Talk:Knot group

message: This article seems to be self-contradictory. There's the paragraph
Two equivalent knots have isomorphic knot groups, so the knot group is a knot invariant and can be used to distinguish between inequivalent knots.
Then in the examples:
The square knot and the granny knot have isomorphic knot groups, yet these two knots are inequivalent.
Perhaps someone familiar with knot theory can clear this up.
Ubermichael 00:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: a pretty late reply but the point is that while it's an invariant, it's not a complete invariant. two equivalent knots have the same knot group but the converse is not true in general. Mct mht 23:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: Could someone add the knot group of the figure eight knot? JackSchmidt (talk) 19:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the knot group for fig. 8 LkNsngth (talk) 23:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, thanks! JackSchmidt (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure eight
Talk:Nae Gong

message: This page really has to go. Look here guys Neigong. Bihal 203.87.35.107 00:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One is Korean, one Chinese. Do they even mean the same thing? Fan-1967 00:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From the description on this page, they mean exactly the same thing. I daresay it's simply the korean pronunciation of the same words. Bihal 00:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of stadiums in Canada

message: I think it's kind of useless to list the stadiums only by their temporary seating capacity. The stadiums very rarely employ temporary seating so it doesn't give a true indication of the size of the stadium. Listing the temporary seating in addition to the true capacity is fine with me. Qutezuce 00:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It reeks of insecurity to list potential capacity, especially since nearly every un-domed stadium around has virtually unlimited POTENTIAL capacity. Rewrote section to reflect actual capacity.  Greg Salter (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Including temporary seating?

message: Even though the article is meant to list PERMANENT capacity, I think we've got to make an exception for Empire Field. It's not the same as the other situations where stadium capacities are temporarily boosted for the Grey Cup. Instead, it's built for more than a full CFL season, and eventually we'll move it to the Historic section. Anyone against this?  Greg Salter (talk) 05:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire Field 

message: This article contains long tables for football and soccer stadiums that is entirely duplicated at List of Canadian Football stadiums by capacity and List of soccer stadiums in Canada.  I'm going to be bold here and delete them, making a shorter article, and at the same time reducing the need to fact check and update everything twice.  Thoughts? 162.208.168.92 (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it. Good job! Matt Deres (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication of info
Talk:Lloyd Irving

message: Should this page really be classified under fictional murderers? RickNomai 00:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can also say that Llyod is not a murder. When he did kill, it was never out of a need to prove himself. He wanted to create a world where everyone was equal. Q E11even 03:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Look at the bottom of the page.  Vandalism much?
"The name Lloyd means "gay." He may have been so named as, for much of the first half of the game, he is shown to waver between saving Colette and regenerating the world; thus not either being boldly "black" or "white." He later regrets his decisions when speaking with Raine after their crash on the Fooji Mountains." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.129.117.2 (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like speculation to me. Should we remove it? (And for the record, it says Lloyd's name is "gray," not "gay.") Patrician Vetinari 14:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... Really now? 

message: This section both states that Lloyd was "born to Anna and Kratos Aurion" and that Kratos killed his wife, but as far as I know, there is no canon information on whether Kratos and Anna were actually married. As we all know, it doesn't necessarily happen that way in the real world, and since there is nothing that verifies this information- correct me if there is- it is purely fan conjecture. Some of the fans, for instance, believe that Anna's last name was Irving, and that Lloyd carries her name, since we never know Dirk's last name for certain either. I suggest that this section be reworded to remove conjecture, but I'm leaving it open here for debate, since there is a possibility that I missed canon information about Lloyd, Anna, and Kratos by not playing any of the other games in which Lloyd or Kratos appears (i.e. "Tales of the World" series). (161.6.165.244 (talk) 10:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjecture in the History Section
Talk:Quizquiz

message: The Italian Wik article, though with-out refs, is significantly longer than ours.  Can some-one fluent in Italian see what we can use? Kdammers 00:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are many good articles inn spanish, and they have references too....we should translate inca´s articles from there like this one--Yapxo (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish version! 

message: The article still needs to be copy-edited. Kdammers (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English is still unacceptable.
Talk:Jay Zeamer Jr.

message: The article states that Zeamer and Sarnoski were the third time two crewmembers on the same mission received the MOH.  It cites  Robert G. Robinson and Ralph Talbot in World War I, and Addison Baker and John L. Jerstad as the other two instances.  There is at least one other, Erwin Bleckley and Harold Goettler received the MOH posthumously following a DH-4 mission to locate the Lost Battalion on 6 Oct 1918 during the Meuse-Argonne offensive. Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_R._Bleckley  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.237.248.208 (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of times two crewmembers received the MOH on the same aircraft/mission 
Talk:Ilyushin Il-6

message: Now that is a problem as I have just replaced the article because of the large number of inaccuaracies, lack of content and the use of references that were erroneous!! I tried to incorprate as much as I could but almost everything had errors or used erroneous references e.g. "pressurised cockpit"-there is no way that the Il-6 had a pressurised cockpit, you can tell that just by looking at the photo's, you don't need a reference. I think there has been some confusion with the TsKB-60 attack aircraft which was also named Il-6 for a while.
Discusssion would be good, personally nothing would be better than what was there before.
Petebutt (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John O'Brien (novelist)

message: In this article in the Cleveland weekly newspaper Free Times ("Before the Court of Wikipedia. Why the People's Encyclopedia Ain't All It's Cracked Up To Be"), Erin O'Brien (sister of John O'Brien) writes about the deletion of the article about herself and then:
:Let's move on to accuracy. [...] John's article asserts, "He also had a cameo in the 1970 film Scrooge." In 1970, John was 10 and I was 5. We lived in Brecksville and all we knew of the movies was that someone named James Bond had a bevy of tiny girlfriends that danced on gun barrels and swam in martini glasses. No cameos, no movies, no Scrooge. I know. I was there.
This information was added on 9 December 2005 by an anonymous user, who might have taken it from the IMDb entry about John O'Brien.
For the moment, I have removed it. IMDb is a renowned and widely used resource, but errors in IMDb entries do happen and a second source should be cited before adding this back into the article.
Erin O'Brien goes on:
:I tried to edit out the erroneous statements on both sites [i.e. in this article and in John O'Brien (novelist)], but some Kiss-the-Hem-of-my-Purple-Robe Wikipedian Lord apparently usurped my efforts.
However, I can't find any such edits in this article. Her account has made no article edits. Maybe not all the information found in Free Times articles is accurate ;)
Regards, High on a tree 00:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are referring to these edits from June 2005? Thanks, you certainly did a lot for the article. However, as far as I can see all the information that you provided is still contained in the article, the Scrooge statement was added much later, and the edit history doesn't show any attempts to remove it. Regards, High on a tree 14:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrooge 

message: Hi my name is Josue infante I have been searching people who want to make a real story a movie or a book.
My story is real and it has many moments of sadness ,pain ,moments of happiness and a very beautiful love story ,
I am currently in Ohio please contact me if you are interested I assure you that everybody is going ni to love my story
Respectfully
Josue Josuyoly (talk) 05:08, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new story to tell
Talk:John Ortberg

message: Ortberg was temporarily removed from his position in Menlo Church when it was revealed by his son that he has allowed a paedophile to work with children, and helped to cover up for this person. I feel this warrants inclusion in the article. Euchrid (talk) 04:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal from Menlo Church

message: I feel that Ortberg's success as an author and well-known status in the evangelical community merits a Wikipedia article. He is already mentioned in the TNIV article.
--Malortberg 00:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this sentence from the article.  It didn't seem to fit, but if someone feels that it belongs, go ahead and add it back in.
:Ortberg has notably spoken out in favor of the recent TNIV translation of the Bible as well as for the Renovaré renewal movement. --Megaboz (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excised From Article 

message: WP:BLPSPS would seem to forbid the use of Danny Lavery's tweets and newsletters here. Should they be removed? Belteshazzar (talk) 06:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tweets and newsletters by estranged son
Talk:Mary Scheier

message: I continue to improve this article, and I intend to use the Prod period to continue to improve and expand the article, with citation and so on. An artist whose work appear in multiple University museums, are pursued by collectors who may pay five digit prices for their works while the artists are still living, who was an artist-in-residence, and part of a husband/wife collaboration is notable. ThuranX 00:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not being the author, I can and do remove the prod, on the basis that being the subject of a notable PBS film is notable, and that this is already asserted and referenced in the article. But please add some more--what will make her more securly notable is her work being the subject of published reviews. Being a team might be unusual, but I dont think its notable in the WP sense. DGG 02:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Council of the People's Deputies

message: Hi, perhaps I'm wrong but I cannot find any historical source of women having the vote in Germany prior to this council's decree.  Isn't the expansion of the vote to women an important enough historical moment to deserve at least a mention as such in this article?  Ie., "By doing so, the council expanded political franchise to women for the first time in German history" or some such?
--logged out User:Kasreyn  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.188.115 (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent point. I found a RS which specifies the exact law establishing women's suffrage.Drow69 (talk) 14:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffrage mention? 

message: "USPD" is used in the article. What is it?--85.104.54.249 (talk) 04:42, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  USPD 

message: Nice work. But there is some overlinking to the parties etc, all these are already wp-linked. The exact status of Ebert as chancellor is questionable. He "received" the office in an unconstitutional manner on 9 November from Max von Baden. Next day, the Council took over and there basically was no chancellor from then on. Scheidemann became head of government in February but was not chancellor. Under the Gesetz über die vorläufige Reichsgewalt there was no title for the position. It was referred to as "President of Ministers". The title "chancellor" only came back with the August 1919 Weimar Constitution.Drow69 (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  table
Talk:G15

message: I removed the EU from the list, since it is not a country. The total (world) is enough for contrast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.142.65.164 (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: European Union

message: I would argue that it is arbitrary, and would like to see some references provided to argue that that is the rationale for it being 15-strong.  After all, there's a gap of 45% between Spain and Italy; Italy and above is the G6 plus BRIC: a logical building block of its own.  I realise that the reason for the disclaimer about arbitrariness is that editors don't want it to seem as if it's a Wikipedia construction, but we need to have references for these statements, people!  Particularly, it must be said, if G15 overwhelmingly refers to the Group of 15 emerging and developing economies. Bastin 15:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Arbitrary?
Talk:Green Left (Denmark)

message: The article states that "SF became a full member of the Global Greens in 2014".  But Wikipedia's article on the Global Greens classes them as an observer, not a full member.  More to the point, the official Global Greens website also classes SF as an associate member, not a full member. https://www.globalgreens.org/member-parties  So either they didn't in fact become a full member in 2014, or they did and then changed their minds subsequently. 86.186.41.29 (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Global Greens

message: See e.g.
*https://sf.dk/om-sf/about-sf-in-english/
* https://europeangreens.eu/riga-2022/005-egp-membership-list-annex-b-egp-statutes 
*https://dipd.dk/en/node/137 Kaihsu (talk) 10:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change to Green Left