Talk:Bombing of Rome in World War II

message: The article now implies that Rome was not an open city, saying " Pope Pius XII unsuccessfully attempted to get Rome declared an open city ...". Eventually Rome was declared an open city, - see also: Rome, Open City. Ekem 19:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: clarified with ref. Ekem 17:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rome, not an open city?

message: There are substantial gains in context and reduced repetition from covering these in the same article. In the unlikely event that this article becomes extremely long, this may be considered as a potential sub-article. As it is, there is more than enough context at Vatican City during World War II and all of the (rather terse) information that we have about the Vatican City bombings is at a level of detail that would be appropriate even in an article about the Rome bombings as a whole. Savidan 23:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bombing of the Vatican]] merged 

message: This article stated that it was the British in an accidental bombing, but another article said that it was the Italians who did it with the belief that the Vatican Radio was sending messages to the Allies. Which is it? 96.57.184.26 (talk) 02:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Dropped the 5 Bombs in the Vatican 

message: In most sources (in English) on the WWII bombing of Rome, the July 19 bombing of San Lorenzo is listed as the first bombing of Rome. What is the source of the information about a bombing in May? Soggiornoselvaggio (talk) 19:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of May Bombing information? 

message: The article affirms that 
"The first bombardment occurred on July 19, 1943 and was carried out by 500 .."
later the same article affirms that 
"On July 19, 1943, Rome was bombed again, more heavily, by 521 Allied planes..."
What is the date of the very first bombing?
And where was the striking  airforce based, in Britain, Africa or Sicily?
By Lawrence from Milano Italy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.228.136.198 (talk) 07:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial 

message: In the quick facts box of the article there is a 40000 civilian casualties number that is not sourced and not referenced anywhere else in the article. It seems like it would be essential that this number be sourced, especially since it looks quite disproportionate in comparison with the apparent scale of the bombing campaign itself. Does anyone have any idea about where this number came from, a source, or a possible replacement?
Choucas Bleu (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilian casualties figure 

message: I see that the same merge was proposed more than 13 years ago but was not responded to, so I figured starting a new discussion here could be helpful. 
The reason are in essence the same: both pages are deeply interconnected, with the context of the two bombing events on the Vatican so intertwined with the bombing of Rome that most of the context is already on this page. Merging would also allow for some cleaning-up of the in my opinion currently quite bloated Bombing of the Vatican content, while bringing some of its additional context into the destination page. Choucas Bleu (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal of [[Bombing of the Vatican]]