Talk:Fart lighting/Archive 1

message: I'm not sure about the validity of the second purpose of lighting farts, but don't have a problem with it lol.. anyone else?
FartDoctor 08:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The overly broad statement on commonness needs to be clarified, probably to say it's like that in the US or wherever. --Shallot 00:37, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: commoness

message: On 14 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lighting farts for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 01:10, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
:notice added at top of talk page with link. Benjiboi 18:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd

message: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. Common usage - I've never, ever heard it referred to as "flatulence ignition". violet/riga (t) 11:02, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Decision

message: This survived a VfD in March, why is it suddenly a candidate for speedy deletion?
Tonywalton 18:20, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed speedy deletion tag

message: In one episode of Robot Chicken, as seen on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim, a boy's fart is lighted and he begins to run really fast, as if he was a rocket.  He runs as fast as a locomotive (in reference to Superman), and at the end, spins on the ground and blows up.  Should this be recommended to add, as I am not very sure I am right and want some clearer details. --68.127.151.199 06:17, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, that was after the kid ate pop rocks and drank soda, in reference to the popular myth that doing such will make your stomach explode.  At any rate, it has nothing to do with fart lighting. 142.59.135.116 05:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add to references in popular culture 

message: I always thought farts were imflammable, like gasoline and stuff.
: AFAIK, there is no such word as imflammable. Although it is a cause of some confusion, flammable and inflammable mean exactly the same thing: capable of burning. I'm not sure if it's true, but I once read that flammable was introduced for warning signs precisely because most people erroneously believed that inflammable meant the opposite (not capable of burning) of what it actually means, since they associated the initial in with the prefix in, meaning not. EmmetCaulfield 10:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflammable / Flammable 

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 17:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A link to "fart lighting" search was added, in this way we're simply stating the videos are out there without promoting a specific one. If some are removed for whatever reasons the search will still pull the ones that are there. Benjiboi 02:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube 

message: No picture ???
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.139.116.20 (talk) 22:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: covered in another section. Benjiboi 18:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT ?