Talk:People's Liberation Army Ground Force

message: There's no point in listing tanks like "type 85-I, type 85-II, type 85-III..." if it's going to point to the same article anyway.  I'd just use "Type 85/96".  I'll clean up the Type 96 MBT article tonight.  --
Adeptitus 05:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The official English tranlation of “中国人民解放军陆军” is "PLA Army". People's Liberation Army Army. There are 2 army in the name.
source：PRC MOD Website.   http://eng.mod.gov.cn/ArmedForces/index.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.224.213.87 (talk) 04:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: About the Official translation

message: Couple of weeks ago, i was using it as a reference to compile my own database on what equipment the PLA use, now when i come back, it has been completely wiped? why is that? couldn't you just left it until you had made a decision on how you guys could of made it better?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.91.85 (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What Happened to the PLA Ground Force article?

message: Is there a talk page on use of thr official Chinese military designations or simply calling everything 'Type'? For example here the 'QBZ-95' is called th 'Type-95' and links to an aricle called 'QBZ-95'. Should this be standardised across Wikipedia? Semi-Lobster 11:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Designation Confusion

message: Does the PLA even use body armour?  A lot of the images of the PLA infantry (including those of the Special Forces) show them without body armour.  I wonder if that is the case because that would be incredibly foolish on the PLA's part.  (Psychoneko (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. US Army had body armor for all soldiers certainly since the late 70s, and for all or nearly all soldiers in Vietnam. CsikosLo (talk) 12:09, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Infantry Armour?

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.   With appropriate citations and references, this article would easily qualify as B class if not higher.   --dashiellx (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I'm suspicious of the CF-08PDW listed under the Submachineguns section. Only one English source has listed this weapon. I find no official Chinese sources confirming it. Furthermore, here is a Chinese forum post making a noticeable effort to judge this as a Photoshop image. I have removed the CF-08PDW. 
Likewise, the weapons under the "Corner Shooters" section, referencing the same source, have been removed.
--71.242.191.208 (talk) 02:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untrusted Source 

message: On this page, NP-58 is listed as being in service with the PLA. On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infantry_Equipment_of_the_People%27s_Liberation_Army_of_China, it is not listed. Can anyone confirm whether or not it is in service with any units, if so, which? 03:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: NP-48 Confusion

message: There has been series of vandalism of this page on March 26th. Still needs to be undone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cifyra (talk • contribs) 19:49, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I find the comprehensive list of equipment nice, but this isn't the time or the place. A short paragraph and a link to another page would suffice, if it wasn't for a lack of content other than said list. SamBrev (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLA Equipment 

message: PLA is not my strong point, but one of you might be interested in this story: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2089218/xi-jinping-plans-first-shake-chinese-army-corps-names CsikosLo (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduction in Corps & Restructuring 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on People's Liberation Army Ground Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205023136/http://www.espritdecorps.ca/new_page_240.htm to http://www.espritdecorps.ca/new_page_240.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104200224/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/default.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/army/default.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081017082508/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/default.asp to http://sinodefence.com/army/default.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130123031252/http://claws.in/SW/SW%20J.62-84.pdf to http://www.claws.in/SW/SW%20J.62-84.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120809155545/http://english.gov.cn/2005-09/02/content_28491.htm to http://english.gov.cn/2005-09/02/content_28491.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050206003403/http://sinodefence.com/army/orbat/default.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/army/orbat/default.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As stated in title, fix. WikiUserKarl (talk) 05:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ...wait, you might be right. Dammit, all of us have been boozled. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism about copying Russian military ranks into this page