lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Black Widow (Chechnya)

message: ... by chechnya-sl .
Hm ... I wonder where she got the idea, however. Such expressions do not usually come out of thin air. They have predecessors, origins, like "Black Widow". --Pan Gerwazy 00:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  We're being quoted 

message: "Shahid" is an Arabic word (شهيد), but -ka is a Slavic ending.  I doubt whether the whole form "Shahidka" is very commonly written in Arabic script... AnonMoos 14:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cant believe this article even exists! This buzzword was invented by some semi-literate scribbler who didnt bother to read something on the topic (old anecdote symbolizes: "I am writer, not a reader!"). If you have one scissor and get one scissor more, you can cut the paper... guess that gives idea about this word. Btw, Shaheeda (definitely non-canonical and questionable). Also, "brides of allah" just predates "brides of christ" and FAILS because all of them are widows. 03:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Arabic script template

message: To add the latest bombings in Moscow to this list?--Senor Freebie (talk) 21:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it time? 

message: For any editors concerned, there is a proposed moved at the disambiguation page Black Widow. If you have anything to add to the discussion, please do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_Widow#Proposed_move Weebro55 (talk) 04:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move at Black Widow. 

message: For any editors concerned, there is a proposed moved at the disambiguation page Black Widow. If you have anything to add to the discussion, please do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Black_Widow#Proposed_move Weebro55 (talk) 04:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move at Black Widow. 

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME. The citations in this article and internet searches show that the term Black Widows is much more common in English. If you search for "shahidka", the news articles coming up tend to have "Black Widows" in the title. Incidentally, the lead of the Russian version of this article doesn't even mentiont the word. Eperoton (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: — Assignment last updated by 4xxxx4 (talk) 20:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Sex, Power and International Politics
Talk:Blue Cross Arena

message: Ok... it looks like they got one regular season game oct 26 vs the caps. I still think its a stretch to call it a NHL venue. ccwaters 19:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.nhl.com/scores/recaps/138_2_recap.html ccwaters 19:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I reverted you, since your edit summary was in error, but now I tend to agree with you that one regular season game doesn't qualify it for the NHL venue category.  Powers 21:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NHL cat 
Talk:Plains-wanderer

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Plains-wanderer female_8173.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 25, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-05-25. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Jacobi method

message: Is there any reason to decompose the remainder into upper and lower components? This unnecessarily complicates the example in my opinion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.26.206.167 (talk) 23:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: In the Algorithm section, the formula between the end of the j loop and the end of the i loop cannot possibly work.  In most languages you can't have a power calculation on the left side of the equals sign.  This needs to be revised to a statement that will actually work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Statguy1 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The left hand side of that formula is not a power calculation.  x_i^{(k+1)} is standard notation in numerical methods for the k + 1 iteration of x sub i.  Unfortunately, this notation does not seem to be defined in any of the Wikipedia articles on numerical methods, although it should be. For example, it should be defined in Iterative method, Gauss-Seidel method, Successive over-relaxation and this article. — Anita5192 (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I just inserted an explanation of the notation in this article and in the three other articles I mentioned above.  Hopefully this will make the articles more clear. — Anita5192 (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithm

message: Nice to see script! Very small comment - it runs in both 2 and 3, maybe no need to say "3"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synecdodave (talk • contribs) 04:42, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. I removed the version number. Gromobir (talk) 13:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Python (2 and 3)
Talk:Joshua Clay

message: Not sure what exactly your problem is, but you need to find somewhere else to play. --Basique 10:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Doczilla

message: Volume number needs to be specified for the character's issue of death. There has been more than one Doom Patrol #55. Doczilla 08:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. --Basique 02:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Volume number needed

message: This article is a mess, so I'd like to point you all to Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/exemplars and Wikipedia:MoS. The introduction is off, the headers don't comply with Manual of Style etc. etc. I know the standard is to be bold in this case, but I just can't be bothered to fix the errors here. I hope someone will do so in my stead. Kusonaga 12:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool fixed as much as I saw. --Basique 15:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Kuse, thanks for the fixup, looks and reads a hell of a lot better. --Basique 10:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Heh. You should be thanking Doczilla actually. He did 95% of the work. Kusonaga 10:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you as well Doczilla. : ) --Basique 12:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of Style 

message: It seems to me that the story where Martin Ellis demonstrates a physical resemblance and similar powers to the dead Clay/Tempest doesn't make any sense as a source for Tempest's ability to fly, but that's what we've got. Anybody got a better idea? --Ted Watson (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, this has been resolved. --Ted Watson (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematical citation 
Talk:Paul Samson

message: Why the double Bruce thing for Dickinson? Was he known as such in the early days, or is it just a legacy of typo from original author? 82.135.152.42 20:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Says "died of cancer"  well, what kind of cancer?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240F:14:2B93:1:6015:9E68:D06B:146B (talk) 04:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Death

message: The page currently reads, "Despite some listings crediting Samson for playing on the Ram Jam 1977 hit single, "Black Betty", he did not play on the record." I know the page previously said that he played session guitar on Black Betty, because I put it there some years ago. The thing is, I knew Paul Sanson, he was the son of my parents' best friends. His mother told my folks that Paul had told her that he played on the recording. As far as I could tell it would have been totally out of character for them to have lied. Of course, I don't know if Paul made it up. But anyway, that's the story. Still, the article reads that he definitively did not play on the recording, so does that claim come with any authority?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmay (talk • contribs) 01:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ram Jam
Talk:Great Walton Railroad

message: "It has been in operation since at least 1987" ?= "since before 1987", if "at least 1987" then ?="some year numbered greater then 1987" the opposite. Surely an exact year for such a recent start can be found.--SilasW (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaningless time
Talk:Buckingham Friends School

message: Rewrote philosophy section-- it was contained in quotes, so may have been copy vio. removed pov testimonial fluff. Trimmed a bit. added wiki links, add source.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 22:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikified  

message: Stub class, alot of cruft here. Almost start class though. The general information is pretty crufty as with the philosophy. Mid importance given the uniqueness and history of the school. Twenty Years 12:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Legalise Cannabis Australia

message: I'm not sure which is the most relevant and the most official website to go with for the infobox. Here are the three I've found:
*   
*   
*  (Update - older page, no longer being considered)
Number two and three appear similar but have subtle differences and are not the same. Please give your reasoning for which you think we should use below. Thank you. Helper201 (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update, upon more closely reading australianhempparty.com/, this is the older page, which then moved to hemp.org.au. We can either keep both of these two pages (number 1 and 2, which may be my preferred option), or decide between them. Again, please leave your thoughts and reasoning below. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 03:21, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Update - I found this website as well - , not sure why it seems to exist as a homepage when it’s very similar to the first link I posted in my original post. Another we should consider. Helper201 (talk) 03:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Party website

message: its pretty standard for positions of individual members to be on their wiki page and not the parties page, it's not significantly relevant to the article and if all individual members various positions on different issues are included on the party page it risks becoming cluttered and reducing the quality of the article Politically Minded Stoner (talk) 06:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , I agree. It’s not something that I have found any evidence to support that the party holds any positions whatsoever on vaccines or vaccine mandates. Its policies and positions simply seem to be only those related cannabis and other related matters. Its candidates and politicians I think can generally hold their own views on other non cannabis related matters such as this. This is simply them exercising their own personal/individual views on a matter unrelated to cannabis or the party. Helper201 (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion to move vote on vaccine mandates to individual members articles
Talk:Dresden Hauptbahnhof

message: The paragraph On 4 October 1989 special trains carrying refugees from Prague to Western Germany went through the station. Demonstrations around the station escalated and began to get violent. Realizing that violence was used to defame demonstrators as "antisocial elements" following Monday demonstrations in GDR where held under the principle of nonviolence. is unclear and I have not been able to make sense of what it is trying to say. I have removed it. Bazza 09:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monday demonstrations 
Talk:Western District, Upper Canada

message: *The fork does not seem necessary--A Y Arktos\talk 20:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Ontario 

message: Prince Edward Duke of Kent lived in Quebec City and Michigan territory was under the English monarchy with an English Prince in North America. ↵(Known as the Prince of Quebec)from 1791-1793 this was when Michigan territory was a part of Ontario / Quebec and a member of Parliament. ↵Detroit was transferred to Quebec under the Quebec Act of 1774 . ↵It was then the third-largest city in the Province of Quebec, after Montreal and Quebec. 1792 Detroit, including settlements on both sides of the river, holds its first election, sending↵three representatives to the Parliament of Upper Canada.↵The Act Against Slavery, 1793, an anti-slavery act passed in Upper Canada. The Act was created partially in response to Loyalist refugees who brought slaves with them.↵Michigan Territory was a part of Upper Canada from 1790-1796 Under British rule Michigan remained a part of Canada. And again in August 1812- Until September 1813 During the war of 1812 or known as the Anglo-American war when Col/general Proctor was temporary governor of Michigan territory. ↵The British retained control of Detroit and Michigan after the American Revolution. When Quebec split into Lower and Upper Canada in 1791, Michigan was part of Kent County, Upper Canada. It held its first democratic elections in August 1792 to send delegates to the new provincial parliament at Newark (now Niagara-on-the-Lake
https://www.legislature.mi.gov › ...PDF
CHRONOLOGY OF MICHIGAN HISTORY
Dec 9, 2022
The Constitutional Act of 1791 split the Province of Quebec into two distinct colonies: Lower Canada in the east and Upper Canada in the west. British officials named the Ottawa River as the boundary between the two new provinces of British North America.
https://www.uottawa.ca › clmc › con...
Constitutional Act (1791) - University of Ottawa
In 1791, the territory north of the Great Lakes was reorganized and divided into Lower Canada and Upper Canada.
In 1791, the British enacted the Constitutional Act, which split Quebec into two parts. Ontario was upstream of the St. Lawrence River so it became Upper Canada and Quebec became Lower Canada.
Upper Canada’s first capital was Newark, which is now Niagara-on-the-Lake. In 1793, the capital was moved to York (now Toronto) to protect it from American attacks. Upper Canada’s first Lieutenant Governor was General John Graves Simcoe. -https://www.ontario.ca/page/about-ontario 2601:407:4180:8D80:ED1B:6AA9:C482:C20D (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michigan apart of the Canadian Parliament from 1790-1796
Talk:Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party

message: I note the Shooters and Fishers Party article refers to a previous name Shooters Party. The Shooters and Fishers Party was registered with AEC 21 August 2007. and the Australian Shooters Party was deregistered in 2006. . The AEC refers to the S&F party as a new party not a name change or abbreviation. These two parties may have similar ideals however it is not the same party renamed. I have removed the previously known as. CamV8 (talk) 06:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it absolutely is the same party renamed. The AEC pages you're looking at (and I hope you don't mind but I changed the link format, since as a ref no one could read it) are not terribly reliable. The de-registration was with the mass de-registration of parties after the tightening of registration rules by the Howard Govt in 2006. They were then re-registered as the Australian Shooters Party, and changed their name to the Shooters and Fishers Party in 2009. Furthermore their own policy document clearly identifies them as the same party renamed. Frickeg (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Party or New name 

message: The link for Current Site returns an insurance company page.
2602:306:CCE1:2C50:C5DB:1C4F:79EC:C6A8 (talk) 05:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I removed the wrong one from the bottom of the page. The correct one is in the infobox. --Scott Davis Talk 12:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong site link

message: Is it really appropriate or unbiased to have the second paragraph of the article end with "SFF sides with Labor on a majority of motions. "
Other than being extremely vague, and unsourced it feels like it's pushing a Coalition agenda, trotting out the old "a vote for x minor party is a vote for y major party" canard that comes up.
This feels extremely non netural and biased and inappropriate for inclusion.
49.195.219.148 (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, didn't notice someone made such a bold claim without a source. Catiline52 (talk) 21:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Siding with Labor
Talk:Johnny Yuma

message: Johnny Yuma is not a cartoon character. He is the character of a 1950s television show called, "The Rebel". Johnny Cash had a song called, "The Rebel - Johnny Yuma".
The preceding unsigned comment was left by 67.78.24.2
:Apparently he's also a cartoon character, but since (according to that article) he is not a main character and appears in only one episode of the cartoon, it seems inappropriate for the redirect to go to the cartoon article.  So, I'm changing it.  -Stellmach 18:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Friends and Joey characters

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Friends_and_Joey_characters#Ursula_Buffay
Shouldn't this character have their own article considering the character also exists in another TV show (Mad About You)? The entry here is already quite long and even has its own infobox (the only character or one of the only ones that does). I think the entry here should be shortened and the text copied over into its own article. Thoughts? -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is only a paragraph long, which would  be insufficient for a standalone article. Are there more sources on this character? Dimadick (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it might be long enough plus more info and sources could be added. The character not only appeared on another TV show (Mad About You) but also originated there, so as a main entry here it seems out of place. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 23:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ursula Buffay]] - own article? 

message: I can't figure out how to edit the template, but Joanna's appearances are off by one season. Her guest appearance should be Season 3 and Recurring should be on Season 4. 24.7.249.204 (talk) 01:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joanna
Talk:Mangajin

message: I think :Image:Mangajin.jpg is not for *real* Mangajin. According to this website, this is a kind of parody. Mulukhiyya 20:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Image:Mangajin1.gif Better? --DoktorSeven 09:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved this sentence here:
"The double pun is that Gaijin is a Japanese word meaning foreigner or outsider."
I'm willing to accept it being a pun on "magazine" (although I think this is really more in English than in Japanese), but I'd like to see some evidence before I accept that it is meant to pun "gaijin" as well.  The first vowel sound is completely different without the "i" in there.  And what would that mean anyway, "ten thousand foreigners?"211.129.135.5 (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaijin?
Talk:Abu Muthana

message: Currently all the article says is he is a spokesman for the Army of Islam.  No other information is given, and no references are cited.  Needs a lot more information to be a useful, cited article. Dugwiki 20:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article almost empty 

message: "Abu Muthana" means "Father of Muthana" (or so I think) and sounds like a nom de guerre. It may well be completely fabricated for the media. I suggest that this article be deleted; its factual content is little more than zero. Writtenright 23:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real name or nom de guerre? 

message: A recent WikiProject reassessment has identified that in January 2011, with this edit, an anonymous editor redirected this article to the Army of Islam (Gaza Strip) article without making an effort to merge any content nor discussing whether this article should be deleted or not. The page history of this redirect thus contains significant non-trivial contributions that could be used in a future article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 09:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected without effort to merge
Talk:Nationalist Party (Australia)

message: Hughes' photo had incorrectly stated that he was Nationalist Party in 1915-23.
That is not really correct.
The Nationalist Party was formed in 1917. So how could he be a Nationalist Party PM before there was a Nationalist Party.
His tenures as PM is as follows.
Labor PM 1915-16
National Labor PM 1916-17
Nationalist PM 1917-23
1.42.38.244 (talk) 15:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hughes was not a Nationalist PM in 1915-17 

message: Just wondering if anyone knew who replaced Joseph Cook as Deputy Leader of the Nationalist Party after Cook's retirement in 1921 - and for that matter who served as Deputy to Bruce and Latham? --Thescrubbythug (talk) 01:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deputy Leaders
Talk:Halekulani, New South Wales

message: An IP editor has raised the question of whether Colongra is a suburb. According to the Geographic Names Board of NSW, Colongra is designated a suburb, a status which was assigned on 17 May 1991 by the GNB. Description reads: "A suburb which contains Munmorah Power Station and fronts the western foreshore of Lake Munmorah. Boundaries as shown on GNB3527." Orderinchaos 14:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburb status of neighbouring Colongra
Talk:Pack-in game

message: This article is heavily US-biased - but I reckon that a comprehensive list of pack-in games over all regions is a bit of a mammoth task.  Tim 12:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe we should list every Pack-in-Game? 98.14.15.12 (talk) 02:35, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Too long.  Impossible to complete.  (And low importance, IMO).  RJFJR (talk) 00:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A list
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Alienus

message: Removed from project page
::Shouln't there be a discussion and consensus before a perm community ban is effected? Also, should we not consider the merits of his edits, even if they are from illegal puppets? We don't really hunt down puppets of others unless they they are doing something very bad like vandalism, etc. Al's edits are good and helping WP. If Al was given a year he would be welcomed back after "time served," but there is no reason to bother with his puppets if they are not doing anything terrible to WP, and esp. not use that as an excuse to arbitrarily issue a community ban to Al.Giovanni33 22:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Banned editors are banned, period. We don't analyze the quality of their edits, particularly when they edit in exactly the same way that got them in trouble in the first place. If Alienus were to edit quietly then no-one would notice him; instead, he continues to engage in the same problematic behavior that got him banned in the first place. Evading bans, and disrupting while doing so, are clear grounds for a permanent community ban. Jayjg (talk) 19:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Perm ban