Talk:Ludovico Sforza

message: This article has way too many images for its length. If it's not expanded, the two that aren't of il Moro should be removed. ɱўɭĩєWhat did I dohttp://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.pngwrong 23:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One image that should go is the one that shows La Belle Ferrionare as definitively Lucrezia.  It's simply not known which woman in the Duke of Milan's househeld is depicted.Levalley (talk) 04:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As it's been awhile and no dissent, I'm making that edit.--LeValley 03:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Cecilia was driven out of the house after Ludovico's marriage with Beatrice (and married off to some other guy). The portrait went with her.  Beatrice would not have just sat around on her thumbs watching Leonardo paint some other mistress.  Exact date on the painting is unknown, but it appears to be after Beatrice married Ludovico.  Cecilia's portrait was later referred to by Beatrice's sister (who apparently did get to see it, prompting her to beg Leonardo to paint one of her).  She wrote directly to Cecilia to ask it be sent to her.  It's a nice legend (that Sforza was so powerful he forced his wife to accept his gumare's, but not supported by fact.). And I want to see an English language citation on the book burning issue. An academic history of Milan in that period or a well-researched bio of Ludovico will do. We have several here at home - no mention of this incident.--LeValley 03:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: The mulberry tree was on his blason because of his name, not vice versa.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.184.19 (talk) 05:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mulberry tree 

message: There seems to be an exclusively Anglo-Saxon dispute about the meaning of the  attribute "il moro". Well, "il moro" in italian does not just mean "the moor".  More simply it is the masculine equivalent of "brunette". Every many that is not just straight blonde can be called "moro".
So moro in his case might just very likely- and very simply - refer to his jet black hair.
--141.151.247.85 (talk) 03:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--LeValley 03:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moro 

message: As a matter of fact, il moro IS the name of the tree as all trees (!) in Italian are masculine. It is the fruit that is feminine, therefore la mora. Whoever wrote this should correct it and pay more attention next time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.212.144.123 (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Il moro, la mora 

message: It says no-where on the page that he commissioned the last supper (leonardo). I haven't edited a page before so could somebody else do it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.226.97.163 (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try.  Not only is that information missing from this page (along with a host of other information about Ludovico which is historically as certain as history gets, such as where he died, under what circumstances and where he is buried), but the article confidently states that La Belle Ferrionere is one of his mistresses - something that was made up long after the fact, and which Louvre art historians are very unsure about.  Indeed, it's a subject of so much debate and research, it's ludicrous to state that this is Lucrezia, when the timing of the picture indicates it might be Beatrice herself, beautified by Leonardo (who definitely drew preliminary profile pictures of her, as he did for his other three quarter subjects - look it up!)--LeValley 03:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The last supper 

message: Somewhere, I have good citations for the 2 mistresses named (but not for many mistresses, as in the older version).  Further, everything I've read has the two mistresses departing the premises once Beatrice arrived.  Leonardo was still in Il Moro's employ at the time of the wedding (obviously), and so knew Beatrice until she died.  Did he sneak around and paint the other mistress after the wedding?  What's the date on this affair?  As stated in the article, Cecilia was Ludovico's mistress before Beatrice, but she was quickly married off and the child she had with Ludovico was raised in her new husband's household.  Ludovico kindly gave her quite a nice dowry.  The real story is much more interesting than this article makes it seem.--LeValley 03:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disentangling oft-repeated lore from fact 

message: See Julia Cartwright's voluminous research in her book, Beatrice D'Este, Duchess of Milan. The hair decorations are not consistent with what Beatrice would have worn, and that it is inconsistent with other portraits of Beatrice - instead, she thinks is Bianca Sforza, his daughter.  This article doesn't say, as far as I can tell, who Bianca's mom is (yet another mistress? Where is this information coming from? I want citations!)--LeValley 04:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait of Beatrice is probably not 

message: They have him reigning in the 1700's!  Someone reversed some numbers somewhere.  I'm not sure I should attempt to edit an info box - but if I can easily grab the dates from the article, I'll try to fix it. Last time I tried an infobox edit, I screwed it up, so there's that.--LeValley 04:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Did what I could.  Ludovico continued to claim he was Duke of Milan until the bitter end (perhaps his death) but it's specious to claim he was still Duke when the French had deposed and imprisoned him.  In this case, anyway "dates of reign" are ambiguous - even the beginning date is ambiguous, since he was de facto ruler long before the duchy properly went to him.--LeValley 04:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The infobox dates on his reign are wrong 

message: She was born in June 1475 and married in January 1491.  She was therefore 15.  I'm making that change.--LeValley 00:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beatrice's age 

message: This sentence confuses me:
"As none of the other Italian states would help, the ruler who had invited the French into Italy four years earlier, Louis, was successful in driving out Ludovico from Milan."
I think it may be due to odd comma placement: it implies that Louis was "the ruler who had invited the French into Italy four years earlier" (instead of Sforza); and it also then starts and ends with disconnected fragments.
I think the correct format should be:
"As none of the other Italian states would help the ruler who had invited the French into Italy four years earlier, Louis was successful in driving out Ludovico from Milan."
The first clause explains the reason for the second clause, and it reads more clearly that way. But I'm not an expert on the subject, so I'm not sure I've got it correct.166.249.96.233 (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd comma placement may lead to the wrong interpretation? 

message: What's up with this entire section?  It reads like hagiography more than anything else - strangely personal and subjective and focused on defending against imputed faults which the reader might not have even been aware of until reading the section.  Also leaving aside the content it's got some odd grammar and punctuation mistakes at times too - feels like it was translated from another language, I assume Italian?  His wife Beatrice also gets a similarly odd treatment as well in her similarly titled section.  I'm not super familiar with Wikipedia but it all feels sorta out of place? 86.16.238.210 (talk) 22:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this set of edits, some of which say they are translated from the Italian (presumably the it:wp bio, or even the sources.).  It's not just that section either. Johnbod (talk) 03:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance and Personality Section 

message: I struggle finding any proper references for the word "coith". Could it be a mere misspelling/-reading/-scanning of "coitus"?Elias (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should "coith" be "coitus"? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion