lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bimbo Rivas

message: Hello
not sure how this works, but here is my case, Bittman Bimbo Rivas, is mentioned in more then one article here in wikipedia, if anyone can assist me in putting up what is needed, I am just learning this wiki edit. I am the son, of Bittman Rivas, all Info is all true, and can be looked up on the internet, with several news articles stating the same info.... all the companies have him listed as a member, or founder.... not sure what else to say yet, but give me some time to update and fix this article it is my first. I am not trying to advertise, I am not selling anything, I just want this info available because people all over the world look him up.
Nyurican
:Don't panic. The page is not tagged for deletion. There are problems with the article but I am sure that they can be fixed. What you need to do is go back to those internet references you found and link them here. The other thing is to make the article more neutral in tone.
:The article got deleted before because it was just a link to Myspace and it looked like spam. Now that there is more content that should not happen again. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have edited this article extensively and made it significantly more acceptable. I have also expanded references. I believe tag can be eliminated.--Lawrlafo (talk) 08:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Significant revisions

message: Bimbo was his stage name and was known as his birth name to many. His birth name should have not been removed form the title. As his birth name made him who he was.
His family would like the title changed back to his full name Bittman John “Bimbo” Rivas. Nyurican (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming to Bittman John “Bimbo” Rivas
Talk:Pat Barry (kickboxer)

message: Someone raised the possibility of moving this page to "Patrick Barry (fighter)" taking into consideration Barry's involvement in MMA.  I think I would agree, but figured I would ask if there is any opposition before moving the page.  There are only 12 articles that link to here that  which is no big deal to change them to the new page.  --TreyGeek (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it IMO. --aktsu (t / c) 18:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Why, because he has had 4 fights in MMA?. What about his involvement in san shou, kickboxing and K-1, if anything it should be Patrick Barry (martial artist). I don't see a reason why it should be moved anyway coz that who he is a "kickboxer" the time his article was created.Marty Rockatansky (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Those also consist of "fighting". --aktsu (t / c) 19:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When I saw User:David.snipes suggest the move, I looked over the page a couple times and did a quick Google search on Barry.  It does seem like Barry is more than just a Kickboxer these days and thought the move would be appropriate.  I do partially agree that (martial artist) would be even better, alas, it seems the naming convention is (fighter).  --TreyGeek (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Who came up with this naming convention anyway, (fighter). it should be (mixed martial artist). sounds like more appropriate for the sport don't you think. man that was an unnecessary move. I don't agree with it at all, are you gonna move it back?Marty Rockatansky (talk) 09:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Take a look at [| Category:American_mixed_martial_artists] - There are a TON of people listed with the _fighters tag - I simply followed the protocol I saw.David.snipes (talk) 17:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

text:  At least change it to (martial artist), for the respect of all different arts he's practiced throughout his career.Marty Rockatansky (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Seems like everyone here is in favor of it, so why not. (David.snipes at User talk:TreyGeek). --aktsu (t / c) 01:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

text:  thx guys.Marty Rockatansky (talk) 06:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Patrick Barry (fighter)"? 

message: Why?  I've followed his career since his 2nd UFC fight 3 years ago and never heard anyone refer to him as "Patrick".  Why wouldn't he be under the name everyone uses, same as everyone else? Senor Vergara (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick?
Talk:Cieszyn Silesia Euroregion

message: - there is no consensus for such a move. Neıl ☎ 10:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Teschen is the name established in English for the whole historic pre-1918 region, see Duchy of Teschen. Using only the Polish name is not acceptable. -- Matthead  DisOuß   00:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Euroregion Cieszyn Silesia was created in 1998. Period. - Darwinek (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: It is one of the possible names, Czech or Polish, no matter. Teschen is mainly German, there is no reason to use German name for the Euroregion in Poland and the Czech Republic. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 01:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Is there any evidence that the current German name is used in English in the context of this contemporary region?  I would be surprised if it is, given that most modern-day English-language references refer to the contemporary town using Cieszyn. Knepflerle (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article fails to provide any evidence that the Polish name is used in English. How about http://www.euregio-teschinensis.org/index2/index_a.php saying The euroregion was established on 22 / 4 / 1998 by the signing of the agreement between Regional Association for the Czech-Polish cooperation of Teschinensis Silesia that consists of The Association of Jablunkov Municipalities, The Association of Karviná District Municipalities and The Regional Council for Development and Cooperation with the headquarters in Třinec (on the Czech side) and Regional Association for Development and Cooperation “Olza“ (on the Polish side).  Obviously Latin, it's safe to say that this translates to English as "Silesia of Teschen", or simply "Teschen Silesia" (same issue there, of course). -- Matthead  DisOuß   02:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Euroregion Cieszyn is  used in English
(pdf)
And in German as well btw
--Molobo (talk) 03:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Michael Barnes

message: I've added Michael Horace Barnes, a US scholar to this Michael Barnes disambiguation page – as when I followed the link to 'Michael Barnes' from the Jean Piaget page on wikipedia the disambiguation page did not actually include this particular Michael Barnes (who is also an expert on Piaget).
Michael Barnes is a significant scholar in his own right, regardless of the fact of this broken trail from the Jean Piaget page, which I fixed.
I hope I've not done the wrong thing, as I've never edited an actual Wikipedia page before (though I did once help prevent a page getting - wrongfully - deleted).
Now I guess we need someone to actually write a brief page on Michael H Barnes himself....
Matthew  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.90.50 (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Photocatalysis

message: How does photochemical oxidation (PCO) fit into this process? It seems like it should be discussed in Photocatalysis#Applications. , who did substantial work on the related Photoelectrochemical oxidation article, any thoughts? PCO is discussed in Air purifier. II | (t - c) 05:56, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photochemical oxidation (PCO) in air purification 

message: At least if I am reading those definitions correction and assuming we are going to follow IUPAC's definitions (not required), most of this article is off-topic. This is what IUPAC Goldbook says 
Photocatalysis: "Change in the rate of a chemical reaction or its initiation under the action of ultraviolet, visible or infrared radiation in the presence of a substance—the photocatalyst—that absorbs light and is involved in the chemical transformation of the reaction partners."
Photocatalyst: "Catalyst able to produce, upon absorption of light, chemical transformations of the reaction partners. The excited state of the photocatalyst repeatedly interacts with the reaction partners forming reaction intermediates and regenerates itself after each cycle of such interactions." (emphasis added).
Perhaps, operationally (i.e. colloquially) photocatalysis usually means that the reaction is stoichiometric in photons, and the catalyst's excited state acts once, de-excites, and then accepts another photon.  This looser meaning differs from that devised by IUPAC.
One more thing: when discussing catalysis, we need to give the balanced equation for the reaction that is being catalyzed!  
 --Smokefoot (talk) 17:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Photocatalysis, what is it?

message: — Assignment last updated by RS UBC800 (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

message: I have made several changes to the article, including making the lead more introductory of elements present in the article, moving and overhauling the homogeneous catalyst section, editing, adding sources and correcting equations in the heterogeneous catalyst section, rewriting the filtration membrane application section to include detailed information, and renaming the construction section to air filtration to make it more relevant to the information provided in the section. This work was done in this sandbox prior to edits done on the article, which included a peer review critic. 
TChem987 (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki Education assignment edit results
Talk:Packet delay variation

message: Apparently Packet Delay Variation and Delay jitter are synonymous; the later article even states this explicitly.  Wikipedia articles are on subjects, not the terms used to name those subjects, so I would say they should be merged.  I'd say this article (PDV) is the better proper article name, as the term is more precise.  Delay jitter can be a redirect to this one.  Comments?  Objections?  —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 19:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unimportant note: Jitter (disambiguation) links to both articles; if they're merged, one of the links should be removed. Hairy Dude (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I find that paragraph is quite misleading. The suppose the exact description should be the difference between successive delay measured. Also the example is an example of metric that use a particular reference, not successive delay. I am also quite confused with IPDV, of which there are many interpretations: Instantaneous packet delay variation, Inter-packet delay variation. Well, there seems no harmonized meanings!?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.140.90.91 (talk) 05:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instantaneous packet delay variation 

message: Hi, 
I'm pretty new to Wikipedia so I hope this is the right place to ask. 
I have two questions. Both are around my contribution for a section on PDV diagrams. 
The first is: I wanted to upload two cpdv diagrams I had generated myself (png format) but Wikipedia did not let me, citing 
copy right check stuff. Does anyone know how to handle this?
The second is: I created an open source (GNU GPL v3+ licensed) tool to create PDV diagrams from pcaps with several example diagrams in its github page. Would it okay to link this here? I want to spare others to have to rewrite such tools again and again, and most network researches might read this article here sooner or later on their journey when they are about to need it. And it contains nice example diagrams
:As long as you're willing to release in the public domain or use a compatible copyright, you should be able to contribute this material to Wikipedia.
:You could add a External links section with a link to your github. Have a look at WP:EL our policies on this sort of content. ~Kvng (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PDV Diagrams
Talk:Sir John Lister Kaye, 1st Baronet

message: There is no place called Denby Grange.  That is the name of the colliery that he was a director of.
I expect that he was from Netherton, Wakefield, which is where the Denby Grange Colliery was, but I cannot find a source for this.  Epa101 (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Denby Grange estate was the seat of the Lister Kaye baronets. The house was demolished in the 20th century. I think it was not far from the Kaye Arms between the mining museum and Grange Moor. The collieries owned by the family were named from the estate. Your speculation about Netherton is entirely wrong. Denby Grange, house and estate, predated the colliery⁬ which was sunk as the "Prince of Wales" or locally "Wood Pit" until it was renamed in the 1940s. J3Mrs (talk) 21:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denby Grange
Talk:Free Society

message: Hi; Editor User:Nirvana2013 just added the :category:Christian anarchism to this article.  No such information is cited in the article, so it's not appropriate currently to catalog it thusly.  I'm cc:ing Nirvana2013 on this comment, since I'm not aware of a Christian anarchist bent to this publication to back it up.  Any other editors have thoughts? In the absence of other opinions or citeable commentary/revisions, we should remove the category. --Lquilter (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the link, my mistake. I thought the editor, Abe Isaak, may have been a Christian anarchist but I cannot find any sources for his beliefs or to back this up. I realise he was raised a Mennonite and as a Christian pacifist, but I do not know if he even believed in God whilst editing the newspaper. Anyway, the majority of contributors to the paper certainly were not Christian anarchists. nirvana2013 (talk) 18:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's certainly possible!  But I admit I would be a bit surprised.  Anyway, glad that's cleared up; I'll certainly be interested to see if you find something later on. --Lquilter (talk) 01:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "christian anarchism"
Talk:Marc Andreyko

message: Apparently Wikipedia policy is now to strangle any new articles in the crib one minute after the first edit, before anyone has a chance to work on them.  Given the fact that there were already several pages linking to this article, the subject of the article works for one of the largest comics publishers in North America on a decades-old franchise, and he works with one of the most prolific comics writers in North America (as mentioned in the first edit), I'm pretty confident that he'll prove notable. - JasonAQuest (talk) 20:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some basic info and references, which I believe clarify his notability. - JasonAQuest (talk) 21:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have declined the speedy deletion request on this article, as I find sufficient assertion of notability to be present. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick-draw-hair-trigger-speedy-deletion tagging

message: Why him being gay needs to be in the introduction? Why does it need to be in this article at all? --179.208.167.229 (talk) 01:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay thing 
Talk:336th Training Group

message: The 478th Bombardment Squadron, 479th Bombardment Squadron and 481st Bombardment Squadron articles should be merged into this article.  The 481st article is a stub and the other two are rated as start only because they have more formatting, not additional content.  These three squadrons were only active during the group's two year stint as a training unit during World War II, and they have no notability separate from the group.  Although the rule on including components in an article is usually applied to company (flight) sized units or smaller, it is in accord with WP:MILMOS to include them in this article.  The group's fourth World War II squadron, the 480th Bombardment Squadron, redirects to 480th Fighter Squadron.  The other three articles should redirect to 336th Training Group#Components.   --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Endorsed - go ahead with the merges. Some of the squadron patches may best reside only on Commons. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:51, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have upmerged the 481st Bombardment Squadron stub. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive index

message: Report generated based on a request from Wikipedia talk:Signatures. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Signatures.
Discussion Topic                                                                                                                	Replies (estimated)	Archive Link
Customising date display in signatures?                                                                                         	3                  	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 6#Customising date display in signatures?
Date stamp format                                                                                                               	18                 	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 9#Date stamp format
Non-default anon. signatures                                                                                                    	9                  	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 7#Non-default anon. signatures
Supporters                                                                                                                      	2                  	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 1#Supporters
templates in sigs                                                                                                               	3                  	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 1#templates in sigs
signing for others                                                                                                              	1                  	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 1#signing for others
Things to avoid: Appearance                                                                                                     	1                  	Wikipedia talk:Signatures/Archive 1#Things to avoid: Appearance
Timestamp generated by Legobot (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Behavior-based safety

message: a) the above is clearly from some promotional stuff
b) I have just reverted a couple of edits.  I did so with some reluctance because they seemed to show a slightly greater awareness than some BBS merchants of the need for employers to provide a safe working environment before they start telling their employees that they have a common purpose to get the accident rate down by the workers acting safely.  However, when the additional text quotes Tim Marsh and has been inserted by user TimMarsh it does seem to be a bit too blatant.  Looking back user DrTimMarsh does seem to have made similar self-referential edits in the past - from which I see he is a UK safety practioner.  I would suggest that if his views are common currency, there must surely be other authors he could reference as advancing them; if not, however sensible they may be, they look much like original research Rjccumbria (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional and self-promotional stuff
Talk:Carlos Luis Fallas

message: I just created a Ligurian language Wikipedia stub of this very same article. How may I link it to the Wikipedias in other languages? Thanks. Nacho2048 (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ligurian version.
Talk:Wabasca oil field

message: I propose to merge Wabasca oil sands into this article as both of them about the same subject. Priority should be given to the Wabasca oil field as older and more developed. No prejudice about the article's name when merged. Beagel (talk) 04:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there was not so much content and it seems uncontroversial, so I went forward and made the merger. Beagel (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Joaquín Gutiérrez

message: This page had a good start, but it really needed a lot of information filled in, so I did a total rewrite. I updated the wikiproject ratings per their appropriate pages, although I'm not involved in the biography project. Please review and update! Please make this article better! Mvblair (talk) 03:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Saket District Centre

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Gaviscon

message: FWIW, Gaviscon seems to be the only such dual-action antacid available in the U.S.  I've had stomach problems for 20 years, had my first ulcer before we knew about H. pylori, and I'd never even heard of alginic acid until I read an article that linked to this one.  I just ran out and bought some, in fact... ask me in 30 minutes if it worked.  Tastes nasty, though.  Worse-than-Pepto kind of nasty.
Anyway, the article seems pretty neutral now - I mean, we could add a "Controversies" section and talk about the Pro-Stomach-Acid March of 2006 (secretly sponsored by Big Hydrochlor), but other than that, it didn't feel like an advertisement... does it still merit the tag?  --JayLevitt (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dual action, advertisement? 

message: The Canadian product does not contain any antacid. It only contains alginate as its medicinal ingredient.
Not true - every bottle of Gaviscon tablets I've purchased in Toronto has listed as the Medicinal Ingredients: Alginic Acid and Magnesium Carbonate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.217.48 (talk) 19:44, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian product 

message: The RB UK formula is totaly different from the GSK formulas.  The UK formula has sodium alginate listed as the first active ingredient  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loriannlesley (talk • contribs) 10:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a reference? Then we can update the article. Thanks! JoeSperrazza (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK product
Talk:USS Adams (1874)

message: This article appears to be suggesting that the hull of the original Adams was rebuilt in the 1870's.   This seems exceedingly implausible as the hull shape shown in the photo is quite unlike that of a ship 90 years older.   Or was the name of the ship only recycled,  which is common ?   Clarification required.Eregli bob (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original rebuilt