Talk:Quin Snyder

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Coachqs.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: My proposal for a compromise: leave the infobox blank, but put the 2012 photo of Snyder within the coaching career section. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I emailed his people. If he or they don't like the image then they can either provide one or go away.--Canoe1967 (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

text: I agree. I have discussed this with many subjects of BLP articles. They can either provide a simple cell phone image or they have to tolerate the best images we have. Most of them don't realize how easy it is to just email a pic to me for uploading. We can put them in the article within minutes of them taking the picture and then wait for OTRS to process the license. If Mr. Snyder does read this then feel free to read http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS and email the image to the address on that page with the license filled out by the rights holder, which is usually the photographer.--Canoe1967 (talk) 08:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

text: To be fair, the rep for Snyder does not edit on a regular basis, as is clear from his contributions history. Part of me still wants to throw him a bone, considering the really nasty vandalism he's had to deal with himself. The Wikipedia community wasn't doing a good job taking care of this article. Zagalejo^^^ 19:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I do want to assume good faith, which is why I had no problem doing without a photo for a month.  However, the good faith now needs to be reciprocated by supplying a reasonable timeline for providing a better photo.  With smart phones and digital cameras, a representative of Snyder should be able to deliver this.—Bagumba (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Daryl Katz has a similar image. He can't be reached easily by phone or email. He lives near me so I may just go kick on his door with my camera and see if he wants to have me take a snap. If I don't get shot be security then they may have a cell phone and just take one themselves. Todd Lieberman's people are emailing me an image after I contacted them. This was after he made a huge mess trying to create his own article. That one is in need of expansion if you would like to help.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Compromise

message: uploaded a new photo at :File:Quin Snyder Utah.jpg. It was deleted from the article on March 13, 2015, apparently because of copyright concerns due to a , but the photo was ultimately kept.  Honestly, the resolution on the new one has its own issues as well. If someone wants to use it because it's more recent, the photo is there.—Bagumba (talk) 21:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry if I wasn't clear, but the deletion discussion that I referred to ended with a decision to keep your photo.—Bagumba (talk) 07:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

text: As  was the last one to remove it, perhaps they have an opinion. As I said before, I personally don't see how one is any better than the other, so I'm indifferent.—Bagumba (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest photo

message: I'd like to discuss this edit here, per BRD. Please put your source here and then we'll discuss. Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 14:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I just put it on the article.  Rikster2 (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 15:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discuss 

message: The last few lines of the Missouri section feels weirdly vague and defensive, with references to "many" allegations and not specifying what the violations were, and the odd "it was learned" phrase at the end. Any objection to an overhaul there (I'll try to do a rewrite this weekend)? Mosmof (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague, maybe POV writing in Mizzou section