lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Slave Ship

message: I removed the following:
:The Murder of 132 slaves, to collect insurance money.
:If the weak and ill were found onboard after reaching
:England, then the insurance money did not apply.
:As a result, Captain Collingworth had them thrown overboard.
:Turner's painting, and Punch magazine, contributed to
:the downfall of slavery.
I'm not really sure how to integrate this into the article, or if it should be there... I'd like to hear other's thoughts. --Falcorian (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Text

message: I was watching a program about Turner on PBS.  It indicated that the painting was made preceding a conference on slavery to be held in London.  Turner portrayed the story of the Zahn (sp. ?) a slave ship traveling near Jamaica whose captain threw overboard 132 slaves in order to collect insurance for cargo lost at sea.  The painting was very poorly received by critics, included Punch magazine which lampooned the painting.
:That was Simon Schama, in an episode of BBC's The Power of Art. Close attention to it would revise some of the inaccuracies in this article. --Wetman 04:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About removed text 

message: I've just removed a number of unreliable references from this article. I'm in the process of updating a number of articles relatingn to the Zong Massacre, so hopefully will be able to improve it myself. But this is a famous painting by a well-known artist, and we can do better than blog posts and university coursework. Celuici (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Or frigging Gardner, ideally - that must devote all of three sentences to the work. Good luck. Johnbod (talk) 13:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable sources 

message: If Turner called it "Slavers Throwing overboard the Dead and Dying—Typhoon coming on", why is it now called "The Slave Ship"?  Who changed it and why?  Surely Turner's name for the painting is its proper name? 86.134.117.49 (talk) 10:01, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has always been called this - it may be what the museum or Gardner's call it, but the original title should be used. Johnbod (talk) 10:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: What a great entry!  Thanks.  How did this painting come to be in Boston's Gardner Museum?  The history of ownership of this work would be interesting to share especially given its subject and impact. Katewill (talk) 02:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks and a question
Talk:Lesbian teen fiction

message: Does anyone have a source to verify this information? Thanks, — Emiellaiendiay 05:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: At the moment, this article reads like it should be titled "Timeline of lesbian teen fiction". -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true. Do you have any ideas how to change this? — Emiellaiendiay 19:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: Why is the list of books headed "Complete list" when it is obviously incomplete? For one thing, it discourages additions. Robina Fox 13:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I'll change it. It was titled as such because there used to be other lists, divided by decade. — Emiellaiendiay 05:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete list?

message: What order is that list in?  It's not chronological or alphabetical. Czolgolz (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: The specific phrase "lesbian teen fiction" does not seem to be notable, looking at the sources on this page. Most sources speak of young adult, lesbian-themed fiction. The difference may seem minute but I don't think so: one is an actual subgenre and the other implies a collection of books sharing certain themes but not necessarily inside the same genre. The latter is not a good topic for an article. 
A merger therefore seems called for. This article is a hybrid between a list and a more traditional article, so a split-and-merge operation seems best: merge the textual content into Lesbian fiction and merge the list into List of books portraying sexual relations between women. Does anyone have any objections to this course of action? If not then I will do it in a couple of days. —K. the Surveyor (talk) 07:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:I, Libertine

message: The genre listed is "Fake novel, Literary hoax" -- the novel is in fact real and its genre likewise can't be nested into its hoax origin. The genre is in fact libertine. 
Was it a bestseller or not? Skomorokh incite 13:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So... 
Talk:Hermon Hosmer Scott

message: Hello,
I'm new to policy and talk pages, please pardon my ignorance.
This page appears to lifted almost word for word from the copyrighted material on the HH Scott website at:
http://hhscott.com/hhsportrait.htm
Shouldn't the real author be cited and a link be included here or something?
--_daev 04:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1 Canadian Air Division

message: Much of this article was copied verbatim by at least one other website (http://silverhawkauthor.com/1-canadian-air-group-canadian-forces-europe_367.html) so content was NOT copied from this page or any other page for WP use for this article. A common occurrence these days. I know this since I was (one of) the original writer(s). BTW, when this page was moved/consolidated, some references were left out. I'll try my best to try to retrieve them. -- BC  talk to me 21:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A heads up for those who think there may be copyvio issues
Talk:The Big O/Archive 2

message: The reality of a 3rd season keeps getting thrown around so I'm against putting in episode titles for a season until it has been confirmed.
whoever put in "ACT 27 -- Intermission", please post a link or the source of the rumor.
I deleted the entire 3rd Season thing because there's no evidence whatsoever on the internet for it. AND, to top it all off, Wikipedia is a source for facts, not rumors, so it shouldn't have been in there in the first place.
So, can someone elaborate on the "incident" with Lazzo? Dar 01:55, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
I'd really love that too, but apparently those who know tend to be tight lipped about the whole thing - Zopwx2 00:34, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd Season 

message: it cant really be called a second season more of a secnd series because it is marketed as the big o 2 and not big o season 2.
:What's often seen as "Seasons" in the US can also be known as "Series" in Japan. Big O II is still considered the second season. Claude 06:34, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, they changed it so the religious fanatics wouldn't bother them.--Claude 02:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  the "second season"
Talk:Tropical Heat

message: LOL, it wasn't THAT terrible.
It ran several times in Germany as well, several years ago and now it's in this moment on TV (Kabel1)...very, very late night time in Germany.
I think the Serbia focus is a bit undeserved, as is the "terrible".
Lastdingo (talk) 00:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "terrible" 

message: I have changed the names on the picture regarding the restaurant. The names were incorrectly placed so I swapped them.--Grole85 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.135.55.48 (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image name change 
Talk:Shu'ubiyya

message: Can you give an example of Non-Persian (Berber! Aramean!) Shu'uby.--Aziz1005 02:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Persian SHU'UBY

message: This Article is biased towards Shu'ubiyya.  --Maha Odeh 13:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: Should point out that under modern Ba`thism, Shu`ubiyya means "treason to the cause of Arab qawmiyya nationalism". AnonMoos (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ba`th

message: "nations (shū'ub) and tribes (qabā'il),"  ? --AW (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? --AW (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are these words a different color? 

message: The article makes some crucial claims but fails to cite reliable neutral sources. As such, it has been tagged for neutrality dispute. -AsceticRosé  05:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality disputed 

message: Can someone please explain to me what "Arabization of Islam in Iran" is supposed to mean? I mean I can understand Arabization of Iran and how some Iranians pushed back against it as mentioned in the reference given. Please let me know what I am missing. Otherwise, I will change it to Arabization of Iran. M.Mohamad9 (talk) 10:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Umayyads introduced a racial element in Islam, enacting laws that treated only Arabs as "true Muslims" and non-Arabs as "Mawali". This sort of ideology of "only Arabs can be real Muslims" is what's meant by that statement, and was one of the biggest causes of the fall of the Umayyads and the rise of the Shu'ubiyya movement. --Qahramani44 (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabization of Islam
Talk:USS Rixey

message: The USS Rixey was a troop transport ship for the 305th Infantry en route from Leyte to the Ryukyu Islands for "Operation Iceberg":
The 305th Combat Team reassembled at Tarragona on February 9, 1945...Soon...planning for the Ryukyus was under way... The first ship to enter the harbor was the USS Draw... By the 26th the combat loading was begun...Loading was completed the night of the 28th... Other ships to arrive later were the USS Henrico, Rixey, Tate, and the Chase. (in Second to None! The Story of the 305th Infantry in World War II, Washington: Infantry Journal Press, 1949, p.145)
-- Deborahjay (talk) 01:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  World War II: Not only casualty transport
Talk:Samuel French Ltd.

message: I'm surprised that there isn't any information on this company's new, sexist, outdated, and homophobic behaviour. This company has recently added a rule that basically says that all actors must play characters of their own sex and cannot play those of the opposite sex. Forget that this throws out hundreds of years of wonderful tradition within the theatre, this is just plain insulting. When are people going to begin making noise and protesting, and why isn't there any information about that now? It's important!
    
If you think this change in the company's policy is relevant, then find some credible sources      and expand the article. Don't be afraid to Be Bold!
Menthaxpiperita (talk) 01:41, 26 February 2008  (UTC)
The above comments are evidently based on a misunderstanding of Samuel French Ltd.’s procedures.
Samuel French has no objection in principle to amateur  actors playing roles of the opposite sex, provided that the integrity of the play in question  is not compromised.   Indeed this may be appropriate in some circumstances, such as a girls’ school  where there are no boys available  to play  the male characters .  However,  performing groups should be aware that some authors may take a different view with respect to their own plays and are legally entitled to do so. 
What Samuel French does not permit without permission having been granted by the author  is the changing of the sex of characters within a particular script.  This is an entirely different situation  from the one referred to above.    For example if , say,  Hercule Poirot became  a female detective  called  Yvette Poirot or Mother Courage became  Father Courage  these  would  clearly be  misrepresentations of the playwrights’  intentions and thus a breach of their moral rights under copyright law.
Paul Taylor
Samuel French Ltd.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjscrow (talk • contribs) 13:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Stub does not appear to merit it's own page, it is merely a subsidiary and the information can easily be transferred. Mramoeba (talk) 15:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Orthoepy

message: The opening information for this article said "Older English forms are orthoepeia and orthoepia.", but this information is not in the OED, nor could it be verified.  All uses on the internet that I examined are either referencing this Wikipedia article or are given a transcription of the Greek word into Latin letters.  Neither of these forms appears to be English. --EncycloPetey 04:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, and I know it's not the same thing, I have seen orthoëpy: "The orthoëpy, i.e. correct pronunciation, of Arabic consonants is most easily acquired by learning from a Moslem to read the Corân aloud." (Elementary Arabic: A Grammar; being an abridgement of Wright's Arabic Grammar, published by Cambridge University Press, 1905.) Mga 16:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Allan Smethurst

message: Allan Francis Smethurst was indeed born in Lancashire. The birth was registered in the Registration District of Bury, Lancs., and, according to the General Register Office indexes, he was born on 18 November 1927, not 19 Nov. 71.35.10.173 04:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Radio Norfolk entry in Wiki says it started broadcasting on 11 September 1980 - if true then Smethurst couldn't have sent his tape there in the 1960s because it didn't exist. What is correct name of the broadcaster?194.72.120.131 (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio Norfolk
Talk:Linder v. United States

message: i was reading and cam across a different statement saying that the supreme court ruled that he was allowed to proscribe the drugs to the addicts. and that they said since it was in a fairly small amount of drugs is an acceptable medical practice when designed temporarily to alleviate an adict's pain.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.209.176 (talk) 01:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  disagreement.
Talk:Cheese curls

message: I'd like to ask someone, who has a bit more of a clue as to what they are doing than me, to merge cheese puffs into this article(prefrably linking the searchwords cheese puff/cheese puffs to cheese curls).
I'll try to figure it out, but with baby steps.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Olemann89 (talk • contribs) 
:If anything, I think it should be the other way around, ie. cheese curls into cheese puffs. I've never heard anyone say "cheese curls" in my life before. - Hinto 21:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Displacement (parapsychology)

message: The page shouldn't have a WPP banner on it. --Chr.K. 05:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; it's gone now. --Ebyabe 01:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: "Paranormal" banner Gone again - if wanting to replace it again, please discuss first and provide a justification Rodgarton (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

message: A user has sought to add a POV tag to this article without offering any discussion. We now have an edit summary from her/him that states "It clearly presents no other side but the parapsychological" as justification. Naturally, as the effect under discussion is a parapsychological one (viz., an anomaly of forced-choice identification), that is how the content of the article must be informed. In any case, statistical issues are referred to, in a non-technical manner, which involve a non-parapsychological hypothesis for the effect. If the tagger has information to add on other such material, we should be happy to see it. We should also consider the speciousness of this tagging by the user in the context of her recent run of such tags over several psi-related articles, and the comments by others on her edits that that she has culled from her Talk page --Rodgarton (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issue
Talk:Alfa Romeo Giulietta (1977)

message: Following the discussion on the talk page for the Alfa Romeo Giulietta, I've created the Alfa Romeo Giulietta (nuova) page. Does anyone have any reliable source to determine if the name should be Alfa Romeo Giulietta (nuova) or Alfa Romeo Nuova Giulietta? --Xagent86 05:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why the lowercase n for nuova? qwertytam 02:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I followed the convention used in the Italian Wikipedia page for the same model of car which also used lower case. However, the correct thing to do would be to refer to reliable sources and decide what is the correct name, obtain agreement with other Alfa Romeo page editors and change it if needed. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 13:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is "nuova" part of the name?  If it's part of a proper name, it would be understandably written in Italian.  If not, should it not be in English ("new"), since this is en.wikipedia.org.  Oddly enough, I was going to reference the "New Beetle" but interestingly, it's called the "New Beetle" on the German language site, and you would think it would be the "Neuer Beetle" but then again, if it followed the German lexicon strictly, it would be "Neuer Käfer," I think, and I don't think VW called it a "Käfer" in German in the first place (VW Type 1 or Model 1 I believe.)Caisson 06 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Its not part of the name, but was called like this, Giulietta (new) doesnt tell much and could be mixed with the new 2010 giulietta ... dont know if they have any name for new beetle, should ask from German people. If we gonna change these names we should discuss it first at WP:CARS, since this case is in many other car articles. We should have general standard here how car articles are named--Typ932 T·C 14:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfa Romeo Giulietta (nuova) or Alfa Romeo Nuova Giulietta
Talk:David Zvi Hoffmann

message: I have seen the name spelled both ways.  See here.  —Dfass 05:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Original German of his work on Documentary Hypothesis https://archive.org/details/diewichtigstenin00hoffuoft
Hebrew translation of it  http://www.hebrewbooks.org/38205
Paper on his life and English translation of the work (a PDF from a bad photocopy)  http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=24106&local_base=GEN01-MCG02
71.163.117.143 (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  online material 

message: This article relies mainly on a few quotes from Ellenson & Jacobs, with no inline citations or page numbers given. There are many unsourced contentions here. Needs a lot of work. MosheEmes (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :D. Hoffmann. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 20#D. Hoffmann until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "D. Hoffmann" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Headhunter (song)

message: im pretty sure that the video was not the result of a mistake !
Anton Corbijn is a very talented and intelligent person- Im sure that he made the video knowing that it was about HEADHUNTER and not EGG HUNTER 
the same mistake he made in a depeche mode video ITS NO GOOD where he has a cameo as a hotel-employer he says  ITS TOO GOOD instead of ITS NO  GOOD 
very strange humor .-)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.121.172 (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a source, why not be bold and edit the article? -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 22:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The source used for the sentence before the 'Egg Hunter' part mentions that Corbijn misheard the name. However, that source is from August 2009. The sentence about 'Egg Hunter' was added a year prior to that. So there's a risk of citogenesis here. Gargaj, you added that sentence in August 2008. Do you know where you got that information? —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 22:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT A MISTAKE ! 
Talk:Kurt W. Tidd

message: The person who wrote this biography also violated the Saurosuchus article, adding an obviously untrue assertation that the creature buggered its prey.
It was the reference to "Russell Banson" that led me here. I reverted both as best as I could.
P.S. I'm not a frequent wikipedia editor so if I did something wrong, please say.
201.238.87.100 17:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Snowmobile skipping

message: Both the quoted figures, and the reference, are dubious. No physical principles underpinning the figures are given, and a simple dimensional analysis argument suggests the "rule of thumb" is incorrect. For skipping, the vertical component of the reaction force (thrust) produced by the water forced backwards by the tread must be on the order of the weight of the snowmobile + rider. The thrust will scale as d(mv)/dt = v.dm/dt, where dm/dt is the mass of water ejected backwards per unit time at speed of tread v; dm/dt ~ (Av).v where A is the width of the tread available for producing the thrust, so thrust ~ v^2, and so we would expect the speed required to counteract the weight to scale as v-squared, not v as claimed in the reference. Robma (talk) 10:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requirement for "skipping" 
Talk:Field trip

message: I can see where this might be merged with school field trip - but the current definition of field trip is broader where school field trip includes specifics that teachers and students, generally in the k-12 range, both experience and engage in.
Where as field trip could include university research excursions, trips made by business endeavors and/or those enjoying their leisure time.
::Please follow convention by signing your posts  --Greenmaven (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

message: I am interested in improving this article. I would be adding information about scientific and non-school field trips. It occurs to me that we might need a disambiguation page to separate two, or more, usages. Does anyone have an opinion? Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 22:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadening the scope 

message: Sorry, this is the English Wikipedia, not the Italian. There is no place for Italian text unless the article actually has something to do with the language. The translation into Italian is unnecessary and makes it seem as if it has greater importance than any other language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherlockian87 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian 

message: How can the article have historic research? It was last edited a month ago. Sausagea1000 (talk) 08:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand what you are asking. - SummerPhDv2.0 02:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error with page issues
Talk:Field Trip Procedures

message: I can see where this might be merged with field trip - but the current definition of field trip is broader where school field trip includes specifics that teachers and students, generally in the k-12 range, both experience and engage in
:That may be true, however, most of what's on the page here is a not viable wikipedia content. WP is not a how-to manual, so the step-by-step process descriptions don't belong here. Lots of info is fairly obvious: of course one plans ahead, further ahead if possible, and the timeframes for it are a useless di(tri?)chotomy; getting approval is a no-brainer too; etc.). And some parts appear specific to certain localities (who approves, what kinds of planning, approvals, and permissions are required, etc.). Need to reflect a global perspective, or else explain how it's locale-specific and talk about it generically, or else explain why something that is of such limited region is notable to those outside. DMacks 05:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)