Talk:Loveless (manga)

message: It is all but explicitly said that Kio is homosexual.
Um, what. I  know there was a character profile of Kio that stated he had a wife (or at least, female lover) and a two-year-old daughter. That doesn't mean Kio can't be homosexual, but I think that implies more that he's at least bisexual. ...Or just flirting with Soubi, since he's not seen to be interested in anyone else. 
Sorry *signs post* I keep forgetting to do that. Kyuu (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Kio 

message: Someone should update the character list to include Bloodless. --Agnostic Certainty (talk) 04:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloodless? 

message: Yeah. I am just looking through this and there are far too many missing elements, I mean other peoples complaints aside, there are MANY characters from both the manga and anime that are missing. Ai, Midori, Ginka, Kinka, I don't believe that Ritsuka's therapist shows up either. So yeah.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.145.243 (talk) 23:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to CD Japan, vol. 9 hasn't even been released yet. Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Characters 

message: 5 Brilliantly Perverted Manga, Jason Thompson --KrebMarkt 06:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: That article quoting Yun Kouga as stating Loveless is "not a yaoi" has always bothered me. It is taken out of context. Loveless is not a yaoi. It is however still a shounen-ai. I'm not really big on being able to edit these articles but thought I'd bring up the point if anyone cares to fix and address it at some point.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHovKRHppp0 <-- In this video of an interview with Yun Kouga at Anime Expo in 2009, I believe, at 7:49, the question is asked "Is Loveless going to become a yaoi or stay shounen-ai?" to which she replies something to the effect of in development she had considered making Loveless a hardcore yaoi but circumstances being what they are that is not happening. She then goes on to say she may someday make a doujinshi though. I don't think simply having it stated that she said it's "not a yaoi" is incorrect and out of context. It basically just sounds like someone trying to prove it's not homosexual in any regard. Which is untrue.
Reyire (talk) 19:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not yaoi"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Loveless (manga). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813171636/http://www.madman.com.au/actions/periodicals.do?method=home&periodicalId=158 to http://www.madman.com.au/actions/periodicals.do?periodicalId=158&method=home
*Added  tag to http://www.soleilmanga.com/manga-112.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091003101712/http://www.manganet.de/index.php/cat/c383_loveless.html?view=reihenintro to http://www.manganet.de/index.php/cat/c383_loveless.html?view=reihenintro
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090723043633/http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/090717/article.asp?parentid=110467 to http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/090717/article.asp?parentID=110467
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified