lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adam Bouska

message: Why did I start this page? Adam Bouska has literally exploded on the scene. A Google search for "Adam+Bouska" produced 54,300 hits. He is already working in Hollywood and is already being featured in Paris, France:
http://www.ohlalaparis.com/ohlalaparis/2007/09/ryan-barry-by-a.html 
Ryoung122 07:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a question for you, Robert: are you also (like "our friend" Walter Breitke) gay (having started the pages about the male models Adam Bouska and Rafael Verga)? Extremely sexy 12:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

text: So I'm right then, you mean? Extremely sexy 15:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for page existence

message: In 2007, Adam Bouska won the WEHO award for best photographer, someone should add this to the page.
http://www.wehoawards.org/2007winners.php
Ryoung122 00:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Award

message: No H8 campaign:
http://www.noh8campaign.com/
http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid81320.asp
Ryoung122 18:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I saw a photo of cher for NOH8 campaign and I think she is one of the most notable celebrities he has done  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.92.174.113 (talk) 03:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Celebrity
Talk:John Arthur Andrews

message: .....is this right? Starting to put in footnotes and it turns out i can't!Jeremy (talk) 06:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, unless you can tell us what they are, we can't help you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Well, actually they are there on page, the superscripts appear on the article and the references appear in the raw text it is just that they do not appear as footnotes down the bottom. I am very puzzled as to why this page has its footnotes  locked. I wrote the original stub article, from 2 online sources. In response to editorial request I was beginning to footnotte each factual assertion. There are other, offline, sources which I plan to  use in time. Who exactly is the "we" who might be able to help me? Is it the same entity that tagged the article as needing footnotes? (I'm relatively new around here) Why not simply remove the lock from the footnotes? There must, I imagine, have been some reason for doing it in the first place but I can't imagine what that reason may have been given that the article is not locked.Jeremy (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnotes
Talk:Porsche Carrera Cup Australia Championship

message: A large chunk of this article appears copied from here. Thinking of slapping on the copyvio tag. Anyone car to try a re-write? --Falcadore (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Please move it back, refer to these official documents:
although in researching this I have also found refence to another title name, 'Carrera Cup Australia Championship'.
Perhaps this needs further research, however, I've not seen official documents refer to the series as "Porsche Carrera Cup Australia" anywhere, which suggests the present article name is not correct. --Falcadore (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Mellon optical memory

message: It'd be great if somebody could find a photograph for this article... but I surmise this is next to impossible. --Ouro (blah blah) 08:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote to Mellon, but got nothing back. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Aristotelian theology

message: Seems like this article does more than discuss Aristotle's view of God. Or is there another article on his metaphysics that I'm missing? -- LightSpectra (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "Aristotelian metaphysics 

message: Did Aristotle actually speak of God at all? I don't think there were really monotheistic religions in his lifetime. I was under the impression that it was Aquinas who perverted Aristotle's teachings to support his own religious agenda. I don't think Aristotle ever actually mentions God, or does he?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.188.47.39 (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  God 

message: The section on the unmoved mover is opaque: "According to the latter reading, Aristotle concluded that "being" primarily refers to the Unmoved Movers, and assigned one of these to each movement in the heavens." Does Aristotle intimate this? Who are the proponents of these different readings? What provokes the notion of a fragmentary philosophical narrative? It would be helpful to include relevant passages from Aristotle's Physics and Metaphysics. In the end, it might be useful to question the necessity of this article; it seems to me that separate pages on Aristotle's works should discuss these topics. Dylan Knight Rogers (talk) 17:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unmoved mover. 

message: This article needs some material on his view of Greek mythology. That's what I came here to look for.99.194.30.170 (talk) 22:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  and Greek Mythology 

message: OK, Aristotelian theology is "influential to" this or that, but shouldn't the article tell first what it is? I still have no clue from looking at this article. It lacks the most important item: a definition in the first summary paragraph, as in all other wiki articles. Chimel31 (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it? 

message: This article makes no sense because Aristotle worshipped Greek gods and not the god of Israel, Jesus, or Allah.--2601:C4:C001:289E:3178:73:73C9:192A (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek gods aren't the Hebrew God
Talk:Formal cause

message: Where in Aristotle can I find a discussion of causes? (This should be in the article.) 128.135.96.5 (talk) 23:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Physics (Aristotle)#Book II.  Wareh (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hermias of Atarneus

message: If this was done as a school project, it should not get a top grade, because there are no inline citations. See Wikipedia:Citing sources. When you state something from ancient history is so, and you have the book in front of you which documents the facts claimed. please include an inline citation. It is not sufficient to write a long article, then list a number of books at the end of the article. The reader cannot be expected to obtain all the reference works, then read through them all page byb page to verify where you found which claimed fact. Edison (talk) 04:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: Walter Leaf, writing in 1915, is the major source here; could we have something more modern - and writing that is less tendentious? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern historians?
Talk:Craig Silvey

message: The lead section fails to establish notability.  Why is this person remarkable?  It needs some key facts to distinguish them from millions of other authors and musicians. - Shiftchange (talk) 04:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  lead fail 
Talk:Material cause

message: I think the sentence "Only one of the four "causes" (the efficient cause) approximates the concept expressed by the English word cause." is not accurate.  It's true that the english word cause does not fit very well with the notion of material cause, but I think that it fits quite well with the idea of a final cause.  Also, I've seen the terms "cause" and "causality" used in scientific and philosophical literature quite frequently to refer to final causes.  Cazort (talk) 02:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pythias

message: The last paragraph on her works in biology says that she worked on a biology encyclopedia with her husband, Mnesachus, which seems to contradict the rest of the article, which makes no mention to any Mnesachus and instead claims she was married to Aristotle. While I can't find any information on anyone called Mnesachus, Wikipedia has information about several other Ancient Greeks named Mnesarchus but none of them seemed to be alive at the same time as Pythias. Is this sentence supposed to be referring to Aristotle instead (which would make sense given he was a biologist) or is it instead talking about a different Pythias? I do not have access to the cited source to check. Baqeua (talk) 01:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Mnesachus?

message: How could she be active in 330 BC if she died in 355 BC? Cw3Retired (talk) 03:56, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Why mention in this article that Pythias was an embryologist, then not provide any further details about this claim in the text of the article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 22:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Embryologist]]? 

message: This page is a source of various more modern poorly researched books claiming Aristotle's wife was an embryologist etc
there is no evidence of this, this page needs to not promote this as it is a source of popular misconception and misinformation. There is no primary evidence of it and most scholars don't mention this because its invented out of nothing.  CantingCrew (talk) 21:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence as a biologist and embryologist
Talk:Counterintelligence Service (Yugoslavia)

message: Since the expansion of the KOS acronym is very generic, some lessons from Talk:OZNA could also be applied here. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. Restored old title. -- Director (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. -- Director (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 
Talk:Vinyl polymer

message: Does anybody know, which Vinyl polymer is used for records? I thing that would be a nice addition to the article...
Polemon 08:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

message: If I recall o
My organic chem (and I don't very well) carbon forms four bonds. (H2CH=CHR) would be five. I think H2CH should be H2C. Please have a look. I certainly can be wrong. I'm no chemist. Thanks. 47.45.116.7 (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well you remember well enough.  Good eye.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is (H2CH=CHR) correct?
Talk:John Italus

message: An image of a manuscript would be ideal to place here. If anyone has access, please act.--FocalPoint (talk) 08:34, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jéské Couriano

message: From :
User:Jéské_Couriano
      run at Wed Oct 10 08:45:53 2007 GMT
Mainspace	2038
Talk:	860
Template:	2
User talk:	783
User:	106
Wikipedia talk:	227
Wikipedia:	408
avg edits per page	4.06
earliest	07:48, 3 August 2006
number of unique pages	1089
total	4424
2006/8 	47 	
2006/9 	14 	
2006/10 	79 	
2006/11 	244 	
2006/12 	203 	
2007/1 	178 	
2007/2 	297 	
2007/3 	736 	
2007/4 	415 	
2007/5 	662 	
2007/6 	517 	
2007/7 	311 	
2007/8 	141 	
2007/9 	340 	
2007/10 	240 	
Mainspace
106	Pikachu
59	Dungeons & Dragons
39	Lucario
38	No Child Left Behind Act
38	Bidoof
30	Eevee
29	Probopass
27	Charizard
25	Luxray
25	Swampert
24	Staraptor
24	Staravia
23	Leafeon
22	Spiritomb
21	Snorlax
Talk:
118	Mudkip/Archive02
45	List of Pokémon (241-260)
44	Dungeons & Dragons
38	Pikachu
28	Bidoof
25	Rotom
23	Giratina
19	Mewtwo
16	Arceus
15	Gallade
12	Lumineon
12	Infernape
11	Lucario
11	Burmy
10	Shaymin
Template:
2	Hcp
User:
67	Jéské Couriano
12	Bibliomaniac15/How many Wikipedians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
5	Jéské Couriano/BlackStarRock
4	Jéské Couriano/monobook.js
2	72.66.13.45
2	Dorvaq
2	J Milburn
User talk:
111	Jéské Couriano
25	PrincessKirlia
18	Ksy92003
15	TheBlazikenMaster
9	BlackStarRock
8	M C Y 1008
8	Alison
8	A Man In Black
7	ArrEmmDee
7	70.144.143.165
6	68.92.233.23
5	62.31.204.134
5	64.230.7.174
5	125.164.190.20
5	Pokemonlover56
Wikipedia:
93	Requests for page protection
87	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
20	Administrator intervention against vandalism
15	Changing username
11	Articles for deletion/Stunky
8	Articles for deletion/Dungeons & Dragons creatures
8	Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon (1-20) (2nd nomination)
7	Suspected sock puppets/70.144.143.165
6	Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Best of BJAODN
6	Requests for comment/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
6	WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons
6	Village pump (policy)
5	Miscellany for deletion/User:Mahmoudahmdeee
5	Articles for deletion/Pokémon video game glitches
5	Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard (second nomination)
Wikipedia talk:
69	WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15
60	WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 18
45	WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 19
43	WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons
6	WikiProject Pokémon/Layout
2	Flagged revisions/Sighted versions
—WODUP 08:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Camotes Islands

message: There is a merge proposal to merge Pilar, Cebu, San Francisco, Cebu, Poro, Cebu, Tudela, Cebu, Pacijan Island, Ponson Island, Poro Island and Tulang Island into this article.
* Oppose this merge. This article should be only about the entire island group as a whole. Unless they are tiny stubs, individual islands have can have separate articles. LGU's will always need an article as per long established standard (see also Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive34#Island municipalities). But since Pilar, Cebu is coterminous with Ponson Island and San Francisco, Cebu is coterminous with Pacijan Island, in these cases the islands can be merged into the municipalities as per established practice, see respective talk pages: Talk:Pilar, Cebu and Talk:San Francisco, Cebu. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discusssion
Talk:The Ghost (novel)

message: If Roman Polanski's film based on the novel begins production, an article should be started at The Ghost (2009 film), and the 1963 Italian horror film at The Ghost (film) should be moved to The Ghost (1963 film).  When that is done, The Ghost (film) should redirect to the disambiguation page The Ghost. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film adaptation 

message: My comment about Rycart resembling Heseltine was excised.  Here's a Guardian rewview that agrees with me; http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/oct/13/featuresreviews.guardianreview20:
"Rycart is decidedly more Michael Heseltine than Robin Cook".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.19.191.196 (talk) 09:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. Have read the Guardian review, but am still none the wiser. Please elaborate. Am eager to know :D Regards Wingspeed (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heseltine 

message: The article mentions Pierce Brosnan, Uma Thurman, and Ewan McGregor, but the Variety article at which the note points (this one ) names Pierce Brosnan, Tilda Swinton, and Nicholas Cage. Did someone update the note (which has "Cage" in its title...) but not the text? Or am I missing something? Scribeoflight (talk) 19:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast of film adaptation
Talk:Metakosmia

message: It doesn't appear that the broken citation was added by Muljadi himself, but it's still a self-published and unreliable source. Doing a cursory search across Wikipedia, there are several citations from him, and at least one external link to his website; however, none of his books appear to be / have been sold by any major booksellers, and the only information I could find on him was self-published. While this and other stubs need citations, please make sure they're reliable sources, and meet the basic standards set by the community for citation. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 22:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tony Wright (Cannock Chase MP)

message: This should really be at Tony Wright (something), as he's never known as Anthony, and possibly the same applies to Anthony David Wright (although I have seen him as Anthony D. Wright in some lists of MPs). Would Tony Wright (Staffordshire politician) and Tony Wright (Norfolk politician) be acceptable? sjorford 15:12, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to declare a conflict of interest as the webmaster of the official website for Tony Wright and point out that I have not altered the meaning of the main prose of the article. I have added facts, images and restructured the page slightly. Nothing has been added, removed or edited to create bias. Twright webmaster 09:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits
Template talk:Robert Harris

message: I deleted the several red links to non-fiction titles included in the template since its creation in 2007.  See WP:NAV: "Red links should be avoided unless they are very likely to be developed into articles, and even if they do, editors are encouraged to write the article first."
For reference, these were: A Higher Form of Killing: Secret Story of Gas and Germ Warfare (1982, with Jeremy Paxman) · Gotcha! The Government, the Media and the Falklands Crisis (1983) · The Making of Neil Kinnock (1984) · Selling Hitler: Story of the Hitler Diaries (1986) · Good and Faithful Servant: Unauthorized Biography of Bernard Ingham (1990) Barsoomian (talk) 05:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links
Talk:Stormy, Misty's Foal

message: I've seen you make these changes a couple of times, and I have to argue against them. 
* The definition of 'plot' necessarily includes the concept of 'summary' (see dictionary.com or wiktionary.com), so "plot summary" is redundant. Every statement of a plot is a summary, though some can be more summarised than others. 
* 'Footnotes' is a technical term that refers originally only to notes placed at the bottom of a physical page; I would argue it is now archaic for webpages. When in doubt, simplify: is my rule. It's the Taoist in me.--Alwpoe 01:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Plot" vs. "Plot Summary" and "Notes" vs. "Footnotes"
Talk:Krotona

message: I realize I'm flirting with WP:OWN here, but it is nice to see an article one has created get some attention from others. Since they didn't bother to mention it to me, I'm just going to hide my thanks on the talk page here! So nyah!! Anyways, thanks a bunch for the picture, Parsifal, that's excellent. Thanks also for Squeak and GregorB. I know this article could be so much longer, I was really hoping someone who knows the story would sketch an outline. But then, I've been wanting to read something besides Schopenhauer and Minsky. :) Thanks again, ya'll. It's nice. Eaglizard 09:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice

message: The Krotona page has a photo (jpg) of Knudsen standing by "the Lotus Pond" which the caption says was located "west of Temple Hill Drive, in San Francisco." I feel sorry for the poor wretch who, taking his cue from that, goes off searching for the Theosophists' Lotus Pond in San Francisco, or, trying to locate Temple Hill Drive supposedly in San Francisco. Unless I am wrong (and apologies in advance if I am) there is not and never has been a Temple Hill Drive in San Francisco, and this photo (jpg) should be corrected to say "Los Angeles" (where in fact everything else in the Krotona article is centered, and where indeed there is a Temple Hill Drive where also the Theosophists had a lotus pond). 68.123.4.18 (talk) 02:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, the photo caption on Wikimedia Commons is just as you say. Thanks 〜 Adflatuss • talk 02:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in San Francisco
Talk:Acoustic coupler

message: "Acoustic couplers are still used by people travelling in areas of the world where electrical connection to the telephone network is illegal or impractical."
could somebody please give some examples? this is very interesting btw.
My computer engineering lecturer http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/warwick.irwin/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostwickenator (talk • contribs) 09:47, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions without headers

message: This topic is of necessity US centric. Having flat rate phone services was available in the U.S., and the cost of telephone communication was prohibitive in many countries for a long time.
See http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/voy/museum/pictures/display/3-2-Modem.htm
I would remove that suggestion. GioCM (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global coverage of topic 

message: I don't think this article mentions how, exactly, bits were encoded in tones.  Can anyone explain?
I'm curious now because, having gotten digital phone service (digital, i think, up to the vendor's modem, where I believe it is converted to analog) our alarm company says their monitoring may be adversely affected.  They offer no rational explanation, but now I suspect it is because their encoding is occasionally mangled by the digitization.  And finally, I'm guessing the encoding they use is whatever those old acoustic modems used. 
Captain Puget (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encoding 

message: The 1983 movie "War Games" featured an acoustic coupler that could auto dial and hang up after calls. It was used to war dial possibly tens of thousands of numbers to find a certain computer used by a software company. Was this possible back then?96.251.0.173 (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 20:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto dial acoustic couplers
Talk:Nguyễn Lạc Hoá

message: Name needs diacritics. Badagnani (talk) 04:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Diacritics
Talk:Anaxarchus

message: Eudemonicus (Εὐδαιμονικὸς) is, literally "Good Spirit."  "Εὐ" means "good." "δαιμον" means "divinity, demon, minor god, attendant spirit (similar to guardian angel)."
96.235.173.81 (talk) 04:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Εὐδαιμονικὸς
Talk:Philo of Larissa

message: The first sentence of this site says; "Philo (or Philon, Greek: Φίλων; 154/3–84/3 BC[1]) of Larissa, was a Greek philosopher."  But the site does not, it seems, differentiate as to just which site, sometimes or always known as "Larissa" did he originate?
Perhaps the author of this site might well refer to  his/her own Wikipedia, or other sources to give the reader some idea of his place of origination?  Regards,  69.92.23.64 (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  From which "Larissa" was Philo actually from?