Talk:Forcepoint

message: Article still seems heavily focused on a singular aspect of their business. Going to try to follow some examples from other entries on computer security firms and bring this more in line with the standard.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MazooSharktooth (talk • contribs) 16:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going to try to bring it more in line with competitors pages 

message: User:204.15.64.200 changed this to an Austin, Texas based company. If that is actually true, you'll need a reference, as it contradicts the official web site. Mark Hurd (talk) 06:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, they intend to HQ in Austin, but I'd wait for their website to acknowledge it has actually changed. Mark Hurd (talk) 01:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has the HQ moved? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Forcepoint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203225409/http://www.mcafee.com/ca/resources/reports/rp-gartner-magic-quadrant-secure-web-gateway.pdf to http://www.mcafee.com/ca/resources/reports/rp-gartner-magic-quadrant-secure-web-gateway.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120418150020/http://www.websense.com/content/support/library/web/v75/wcg_deploy/WCG_Deploy.1.3.aspx to http://www.websense.com/content/support/library/web/v75/wcg_deploy/WCG_Deploy.1.3.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080511185218/http://www.riaclu.org/friendly/documents/2005libraryinternetreport.pdf to http://www.riaclu.org/friendly/documents/2005libraryinternetreport.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Forcepoint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925110123/http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA17/001/2004/en/9dc9d9e2-d64d-11dd-ab95-a13b602c0642/asa170012004en.pdf to https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA17/001/2004/en/9dc9d9e2-d64d-11dd-ab95-a13b602c0642/asa170012004en.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080510083109/http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=1135&p=local&a=5 to http://yementimes.com/article.shtml?i=1135&p=local&a=5
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I urge folks watching this article to consider doing their own searches for sources to ensure that this is truly NPOV.   
As of the summer there were discussions about spinning off Forcepoint via an IPO or sale, and quite often buffing up the WP page is part of the PR around doing that. Jytdog (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Passes my smell test. Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV check