Talk:GNU Classpath

message: Is it really that complete? What was Richard Stallman's whole complaint about OpenOffice.org 2.0 and Java if Classpath is so complete?
: http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk14-classpath.html and http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk13-classpath.html show daily status of compatibility tests. They are over %96 and %95 respectivley for 1.3 and 1.4 spec. Glvgfz 12:21, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple: it was capitalized because that's how they spell it (source: ). I moved it back. Haakon 12:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled discussion

message: Is this the same thing as libgcj, and if not, what's the difference?
: They are different implementations of the Java standard libraries, but are now being merged, such that libgcj will eventually use Classpath. You can follow the progress of the merge here. Haakon 13:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  libgcj 

message: This article doesn't say anything about why anyone would want to create "a free implementation of the standard class library for the Java programming language". What is the motivation? What is the added value? In other words: what is the significance of GNU Classpath? It would be nice if some of this could be mentioned in the intro. Thanks! --The Wild Falcon 10:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because GNU Classpath comes with the four freedoms of free software, of course.  Thanks for the reminder, it's easy to forget that people coming from other perspectives won't assume this.  I'll mention it in the intro. Gronky 20:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the class library from Sun comes with them too these days, and Sun is in the process of getting the remaining non-free bits replaced, so this may no longer be a satisfactory answer to the part about GNU Classpath's significance. -- Coffee2theorems 00:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's significance is a different question to it's reason for being written in the first place, but it's also an interesting question.  I'll see if I can add something further. Gronky 09:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Including the free as in beer versus free as in speech distinction. Autarch 16:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GNU Classpath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060720171116/http://public.smi.ethz.ch:80/blog/2006/01/25/permeable-development/ to http://public.smi.ethz.ch/blog/2006/01/25/permeable-development/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on GNU Classpath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090715130332/http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/javax/swing/text/html/HTMLWriter.html to http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/javax/swing/text/html/HTMLWriter.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://public.smi.ethz.ch/blog/2006/01/25/permeable-development/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified