Talk:Ditchling Beacon

message: I am going to reference some posts from established and recognised blogs with regards to the many rare Bryophytes that are present on Ditchling Beacon - http://analternativenaturalhistoryofsussex.blogspot.com/2013/02/dubius-records.html and http://northdownsandbeyond.blogspot.com/2014/02/moss-bros.html. I have no doubt of their reliability. I will also be in contact with the records office.
:I have contacted the Sussex Recorder for Bryophyte, Sue Rubinstein, who has confirmed the records and added some more. Paolo Oprandi (talk) 18:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to blog posts in relation to Bryophytes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Ditchling Beacon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105203722/http://www2.prestel.co.uk:80/aspen/sussex/ditchling.html to http://www2.prestel.co.uk/aspen/sussex/ditchling.html#arch1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207041302/http://www.allaboutsussex.co.uk:80/default.asp?id=placestovisit306 to http://www.allaboutsussex.co.uk/default.asp?id=placestovisit306
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070528042609/http://www.sussexwt.org.uk:80/reserves_ditchling.htm to http://www.sussexwt.org.uk/reserves_ditchling.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105203722/http://www2.prestel.co.uk:80/aspen/sussex/ditchling.html to http://www2.prestel.co.uk/aspen/sussex/ditchling.html#arch1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello
This is first post, so please forgive any unintended slips of protocol.
The coordinates of Ditchling Beacon are given on this page as 50 deg 54 min 02 sec N 0 deg 06 min 25 sec W.
Google Maps shows this point as somewhat to the south of the main path, so I checked on the Ordnance Survey site, which gives a decimal version equating to 50 deg 54 min 7.2 sec N 0 deg 06 min 25.95 sec W.
Those OS coordinates equate to a point on (or very close to) the main path (the South Downs Way), which is what I'd have expected.
Apart from the rounding in the final figure, the only difference is the seconds coefficient of the latitude figure. Has this possibly been mis-typed?
If all this sounds rather academic, I've been trying to find the location of the original Iron Age hill-fort that housed the beacon in 1588 when it was lit to warn of the approaching Spanish Armada. I've been in touch with the National Trust, who said that not only are there no remains of that fort, but there are also no records of where it was originally sited.
So can someone please confirm where the current Wikipedia coordinates came from? Where they just a simple mis-typing of the OS reference, or is there something deeper here that I'm missing?
Also if anyone has any further information on the location of the original beacon I'd be most grateful to hear from you.
Many thanks
Bobnovelist2017 (talk) 13:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comment.  I've checked the OS site's coordinates and they look more accurate – right on the path just west of the car park.  I will change them in the article accordingly.  I have a number of Sussex-related books, so I will have a look through them at some point and will let you know if I find anything substantive about the hill-fort.  Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 10:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Querying the coordinates