Talk:Southend United F.C.

message: British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. However, is" works better than "are" with the term  club as it is a singular and not a plural noun. (Compare with the word team which is a plural noun) --Siva1979Talk to me 12:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I broadly agree but there are some very passionate editors out there who don't and who want the "British" (it isn't how people talk in my part of the country, I assume they mean Northern English) style of plurals for everything.  In any case, the stuff is so often illiterate that it scarcely matters Chrismorey (talk) 07:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on British English 

message: I've suggested we split out the section relating to Fossets Farm into its own article as it is very large and is not directly about the team. We can then have a section about "Stadia" mentioning Roots Hall and how they are planning on moving to Fossets Farm soon.
PS as we can't have POV on the main article space I just wanted to add: ONE-NIL ONE-NIL ONE-NIL ONE-NIL - Take that Rooney you shrek faced git ;) MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 22:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: :Image:Southend United badge.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Southend United badge.gif

message: This is a wild goose chase, I fear, but I gotta ask. I've got a photo from a 1906 friendly of Magdeburger FC Viktoria von 1896 supposedly playing Southend Utd. Can anyone confirm that there has been such a friendly? Madcynic (talk) 13:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1906 friendly 

message: I find the first paragraph confusing. It states that Southend has had three stadia, then names four (1. Kursaal, 2. Greyhound Park, 3. Writtle Street, 4. Roots Hall). It then goes on to say that Roots Hall, the current stadium, was Southend's first stadium. Can someone make this clearer? NevarMaor (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadium 

message: There appears to be no article of the type "List of X F C seasons" for the club.  Given the almost-incredible detail of the History article, could someone not summarise the club's career in a factual and structured way? Chrismorey (talk) 07:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing record 

message: I noticed the infobox was broken & fixed it.  At that point I noticed some references to Stalin and Hitler that seemed wrong.  I removed those.  It would be a good idea for someone more familiar with the club to go through this article and make sure there isn't anything else like that lurking.  Agassiz830 (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitler / Stalin Crap + Infobox Broken 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Southend United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081203133709/http://www.southendunited.co.uk/page/WhosWho/0,,10444,00.html to http://www.southendunited.co.uk/page/WhosWho/0,,10444,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081203155743/http://www.southendunited.co.uk/page/HistoryDetail/0,,10444~1028525,00.html to http://www.southendunited.co.uk/page/HistoryDetail/0,,10444~1028525,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Southend United F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120212163637/http://www.southendunited.co.uk/page/RootsHall/0,,10444,00.html to http://www.southendunited.co.uk/page/RootsHall/0,,10444,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Following Michaeldble's addition of a Recentism template in the history section, I have done some significant pruning of this article (much of the detail is still shown in the History of Southend United F.C. article). Given that the last three years have been an almost constant crisis for Southend (echoing the similar crisis at Bury F.C., perhaps - but also unprecedented in Southend's history), I found it difficult to trim further, but other editors may disagree and make further edits.
(I am conscious that Recentism isn't just about too much recent coverage; it is also about insufficient detail regarding past periods. Unfortunately, I don't have access to extensive reliable sources about the club's earlier history.) Paul W (talk) 22:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recentism