Talk:Ekron

message: In (2 Kings 1): "When Ahaziah fell through the lattice in his upper chamber which [was] in Samaria, and became ill, he sent messengers to inquire of the god of Ekron, whether I will recover from this sickness." Can anyone familiar with the Hebrew tell us whether the deity of Ekron is given a gender in the Hebrew text that is rendered "god"? --Wetman 00:12, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How did the town of Ekron, Kentucky get its name?
 (anonymous)
:...and the city of Akron, Ohio, deleted from the article? --Wetman 01:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a disambig page to deal with cities named after, or similar to Ekron Brando130 22:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ekron, Kentucky 

message: I have not reverted the wholesale changing of BC to BCE on the article , but I have removed notices on the article and talk page that seem to be made to ward off other editors from doing so. For one thing, the BC/BCE issue is not yet fully resolved, but the original creation of this article  used both conventions (compare 712 BCE / 603BC) and the article did not have a totally consistent convention for almost a year  (at which time it went to BC, where it stayed until changed, almost two and a half years later)
Additionally, there is no consensus that the original author's convention must or should be used, most editors in fact dont seem to support this. (See for example ) Brando130 22:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Misinformed or disingenuous? When I created this page, 27 November 2003, I employed the BCE convention perfectly consistently throughout, as any educatecd person would have done. "BC/AD" is perfectly okay in the context of Christian subjects; it is not used in archaeology. There is in fact a Wikipedia consensus to use whatever convention has been established, on a page-by-page. I am returning the commented-out notice to the top of the page: removing it is a gross discourtesy. --Wetman 00:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You really shouldn't phrase it like that ("perfectly consistent.. as any educated person would have done..") in light of the fact that the link you provide clearly uses both conventions (again, compare 712 BCE with 603 BC on that link) - That may be a typo, but it is not clearly established Wikipedia policy that BC be confined to Christian topics, and I have already provided a link demonstrating one example that the original author's convention is not accepted as the standard in all cases. The article's overall 'established' convention is not necessarily the unilateral convention of the original author, and btw, the gross discourtesy, in my opinion, would have been to revert the dates, which I avoided doing. Brando130 18:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the wholesale statement that BC is not used in archaeology is false. I can cite archaeological material that uses BC throughout, just with what's sitting right in front of me as an example Price, T. Douglas "Principles of Archaeology" (McGraw-Hill, 2007) Brando130 18:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Eras 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ekron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150601140715/http://www.aiar.org/docs/EkronSummary.pdf to http://www.aiar.org/docs/ekronsummary.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150601140715/http://www.aiar.org/docs/EkronSummary.pdf to http://www.aiar.org/docs/ekronsummary.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ekron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521204350/http://cojs.org/cojswiki/Ekron_of_the_Philistines%2C_Trude_Dothan_and_Seymour_Gitin%2C_BAR_16%3A01%2C_Jan/Feb_1990. to http://cojs.org/cojswiki/Ekron_of_the_Philistines%2C_Trude_Dothan_and_Seymour_Gitin%2C_BAR_16%3A01%2C_Jan/Feb_1990.
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110131122815/http://www.aiar.org/miqneekron.html to http://www.aiar.org/miqneekron.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified