lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Raúl Alfaro Torres

message: In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for , or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation. 
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added external links and will be editing article this monthCallelinea (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice: This article lacks [[WP:A]] to establish {{ #switch: {{lc:Biographies}}
| academics = [[WP:PROF]]
| biographies = [[WP:BIO]]
| people = [[WP:BIO]]
| companies = [[WP:CORP]]
| groups = [[WP:CORP]]
| fiction = [[WP:FICTION]]
| music = [[WP:MUSIC]]
| schools = [[WP:SCL]]
| web = [[WP:WEB]]
| proposed = [[WP:N]]}}

message: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 05:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Raúl Corrales Forno

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please use  templates to format the References you added (as mentioned already) so that they will use standard formatting for display ... and please wikilink the publications.
When you decline a PROD, you should leave a new message on the talk page, not just a misleading edit summary like "Added references to prove notability". —72.75.72.63 (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References are not notability in themselves
Talk:Pablo Cano

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added References and External links will be editing article this month.Callelinea (talk) 22:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 06:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed 

message: I've moved the group shows to here.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 20:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Group exhibitions
Talk:Crosseola

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Rafael Zarza Gonzalez

message: Zarza has been unpopular with Cuban dictators - both Batista and Castro.  That has had an effect on his reputation in Cuba as well as, from time to time, his freed.  Nevertheless, an example of his work, Dancing with Bull, is now on display at the Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes in Havana.  See 2011 link:
http://www.cubanartnews.org/can/post/rafael_zarza_dancing_with_bulls_at_the_museo_nacional_de_bellas_artes
76.30.13.94 (talk) 01:29, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
for background about this article, and please update it with any 
changes that you make to this article. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 13:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Pablo Quert

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
for background about this article, and please update it with any 
changes that you make to this article. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 13:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Pablo Borges Delgado

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added External links will be editing article this monthCallelinea (talk) 22:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Noel Guzmán Boffil Rojas

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have changed the References section to External links, because that's all they are ... they are not reliable source citations that demonstrate "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:BIO) ... nonetheless, I have replaced the URLs provided by Some Other Editor with  tags.
Happy Editing! — 21:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "References"
Talk:Newton Estape Vila

message: This article has not been edited since 2008, since it has not been improved and the original issues pertaining to the proposed deletion haven't been addressed, I'm proposing it for deletion again.
Hatoulah (talk) 07:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for , or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation. 
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added External Links. will be editing article this month. Callelinea (talk) 22:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice: This article lacks [[WP:A]] to establish {{ #switch: {{lc:Biographies}}
| academics = [[WP:PROF]]
| biographies = [[WP:BIO]]
| people = [[WP:BIO]]
| companies = [[WP:CORP]]
| groups = [[WP:CORP]]
| fiction = [[WP:FICTION]]
| music = [[WP:MUSIC]]
| schools = [[WP:SCL]]
| web = [[WP:WEB]]
| proposed = [[WP:N]]}}

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Mirta Cerra Herrera

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added a reference of a book with a chapter on her.  Will edit article sometime this month. Callelinea (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Declined PROD

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Miguel Cubiles

message: Added External Links and will be editing article this month. Callelinea (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declined PROD 

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Legal recourse

message: # (cur) (last)  01:12, 3 February 2008 Treekids (Talk | contribs) (481 bytes) (is this better? please let this stub grow- this article should exist) (undo)
# (cur) (last) 20:30, 2 February 2008 HelloAnnyong (Talk | contribs) (701 bytes) (Proposing article for deletion per WP:PROD. using TW) (undo)
*OK, I don't think the original was really a howto- I was just trying to word it simply and clearly.  Tne new wording is more encyclopedic, I guess, but more awkward. --Treekids (talk) 09:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please let this stub grow
Talk:List of Kashimashi: Girl Meets Girl chapters

message: I've copyedited the article as best I can for now -- I'll check back in a week or so with (I hope) a fresh eye for awkward phrases, and of course I'll be available to assist with an FLC. Regarding which, this will not pass for FL as long as the encyclopedia section of ANN is used as a reference (it's there three times) because, as it's user-editable, it is officially deemed not reliable. For the credits, I recommend either finding a review on ANN or Mania.com or the like that happens to mention the credit, or the books themselves (yes, paper references are acceptable). For the show/release dates, I thought I came across those on the official website, in the episode summaries -- or at least, many anime websites give airdates with the episode summaries. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the refs with reliable sources; thank you so much for the copyedit.--十八 18:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  De nada. Did you also want a pass done on the main article? —Quasirandom (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's possible yes.--十八 21:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll poke at it next week, then. (Ping me if I forget.) —Quasirandom (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 
Talk:Lamont (name)

message: It's questionable to mix the two names in one article as they have different origins and pronunciations. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not questionable. Lamont is a surname with multiple origins - read the article and click the reference. This article covers both origins. I've heard both pronunciations of Lamont in real life. It's not uncommon for names to have multiple origins, or differing opinions of the name's origin.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

text: See here .--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

text: This is kind of interesting . It's a genealogy forum, and people are talking about descending from the Scottish Lamonts, and then one 18th century Lamont in particular. One of the descendants of this man spells his/her name LaMont, another spells his name Lamont.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Yep American. I think there's a very good chance that today most Lamonts are American, and that they pronounce their name the 'American/French' way. Follow that ancestry link again and search the page for "Sanders", and read that person's comment. He/She says they had a "LaMont" grandmother.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 11:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lamont ain't La Mont
Talk:Tashahhud

message: For Muslims who are reading this article, this is not the full Tashahhud as can be used during prayer. The amount that is written here could be used only for the second rakkat of any Namaz other than Fajr and Two Rakat Sunnah's. 
211.29.43.191 (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Full

message: Can somebody please translate the Zaidi variant? --2602:306:321B:B890:B197:39FD:B8EA:19C1 (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the folks at Salvation Ark provide me with a copy of the translation and have updated it accordingly. ￼ 72.212.22.28 (talk) 19:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zaidi Recitation 
Talk:Tara Singh Varma

message: ...in the continental part of the Netherlands: sure, I understand the rationale, but I don't think there would be much ambiguity, since there's no Amsterdam in Surinam, as far as I know, only a Nieuw-Amsterdam. Drmies (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The point is to explain how she became an MP for the Netherlands. That she moved within the Kingdom of the Netherlands between Surinam and the continental part of the Netherlands is an important aspect of that. C mon (talk) 07:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Amsterdam...

message: Affaire is a Dutch word (borrowed from French ;), but is it English, too? I would rather substitute something like Incident or perhaps Scandal...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.13.24 (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Affaire
Talk:Tideway

message: I think a citation is needed for the claim that sewage outflows into the river happen 'several times a year' - I only recall one in recent memory (maybe the last 5 years?), during a flood period. Mildlydiverting (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environment 

message: Please could the article include something about the tidal reaches of the Thames. How are they defined and what are the names (eg. Blackwall Reach, Erith Reach ...)? --Rob Kam (talk) 10:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now included, copied from Watermen#See_also --Rob Kam (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have added the two lower reaches, the Lower Hope and Sea Reach. Pterre (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidal Reaches 

message: Needed. Some sources give Londinium as the tidal limit of the Thames at the time of its founding, while Staines-upon-Thames claims it was the tidal limit until the 14th century. — LlywelynII 17:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Reinhard Breinburg

message: Some source said they were cousin, any reliable source? Matthew_hk tc 10:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ronald Breinburg

message: Wait... He was Dutch-born naturalised Aruban? But Aruba doesn't have its own nationality, Arubans are Dutch as well. Furthermore, why would he be naturalised to Aruba? He plays for Quick Boys, which is a Dutch (NL) soccer club. Something's not right in that sentence... PPP (talk) 11:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Cospatrick (ship)

message: Above...
--74.46.70.78 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See here Socrates2008 (Talk) 00:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't see any mention of cannibalism... 
Talk:Amber Sherlock

message: I have decided to move the page to Amber Sherlock as she is now using her married name of Sherlock. 
(Robbo128 10:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for moving page

message: Per an RSN discussion, FrostSnow is not a reliable source. SueDonem (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date 
Talk:JuK

message: In the article, aRts is still mentioned as the default backend. We now however that aRts has been replaced by Phonon. Also, in the Kubuntu package descriprion, JuK seems to depend on Phonon Typhoner (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to edit it myself because of potential WP:COI issues, but I would recommend removing that line altogether. The KDE 3 version is still the most used version at this point... Scott.wheeler (talk) 15:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just remove that line? Ok ;-). By the way, what about the version number? JuK is part of the kdemultimedia package, so it follows the KDE release schedule. Typhoner (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Phonon?

message: I think that this  screenshot is better than this  because it shows the tag editor, and also this is a fullscreen screenshot, shows not the KDE desktop, only program Juk. 
Both screenshots are old, it would be better to have the KDE 4 version one, like this  but it doesn't shows the tag editor nor all the columns information.
--KDesk (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag editor isn't shown by default, so I think it shouldn't be shown in default screenshot.  How about this?  I'll take a screenshot of JuK in KDE 4 with the current configuration and add that. Scott.wheeler (talk) 00:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea! --KDesk (talk) 16:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

text:  Looks good -- one with music loaded would be nicer though. Scott.wheeler (talk) 17:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have made a new screenshot, is it ok?  --KDesk (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's fine. Scott.wheeler (talk) 23:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshot