lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Berea College

message: It's two sentence addition from the most reliable data in the industry. Most students, parents, and others like to know the data. I guess much of the page can be removed based on "not helpful" if that's not helpful. Please refrain from Wikipedia:Ownership of content SMH2023s (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Elaboration is needed because "median salary" does not deliver enough specificity. It's also baised. Some colleges with huge humanity departments will have their salary data artifically depressed. Salary data is notable, featuring in almost all rankings, reivews, and other media. SMH2023s (talk) 22:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement "The median salaries of graduates vary across disciplines" is inane. It's obvious and unhelpful and unnecessary. ElKevbo (talk) 23:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's used to link the two sentences. The previous one describe the college's median salary. The next one describes the median salaries of a few majors. If the reader is interested in exploring further, he or she can use the link. Median salaries of all majors are not added because it would be indiscriminate collection of stats. I removed "vary across disciplines." SMH2023s (talk) 23:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So it's WP:SYN? ElKevbo (talk) 23:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by snythesis? It makes no snythesis or interpretation. It describes data, which is notable. SMH2023s (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salary data 

message: It looks like a bunch of notable alumni were removed in  this edit and should be restored. FloridaArmy (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we have to be a bit conservative with which alumni we name as the list is quite long. I'm not opposing restoring these people though. —Panamitsu (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni removal
Talk:Raleigh Chopper

message: To quote from the article: "Nevertheless the Chopper was always the cool bike to own, and those who didn't have one were often envious of those who did." This is probably subjective. This may have been the case in the late 70s, but in my experience in the early 80s (in the UK at any rate), the Chopper was pretty much a laughing stock, especially when the likes of the Grifter and BMXes arrived on the scene. --Sonance 13:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chopper was the trend setter for what universally became known as the Banana Bike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheelie_bike.  It was the prototype for every bicycle company in the west.  I had a red Ross Apollo.  The "coolest" IS VERY subjective.  I know that every guy was proud of his banana bike and the wheelies he could "pop" w/ it.User:JCHeverly 15:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Coolness

message: "A smaller version aimed at younger children, the Tomahawk, was also popular."
There was a range of cycles from Raleigh, not just the Tomahawk, which had a similar style to the Chopper but were available for smaller riders. The range, starting with greatest first, was thus:
CHOPPER
CHIPPER
TOMAHAWK
CHIPPY
BUDGIE
Images of these can be found on the Raleigh Chopper Owners' Club:
Raleigh Chopper Owners' Club
LewisR 22:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Small Choppers

message: Probably worth making the point that the Raleigh Chopper's frame mounted gearshift wasn't totally unique - I possessed a Puch Highriser with a 5 speed frame-mounted shift. It is true to say, however, that, Raleigh seem to have got there first...  Paul-b4 09:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gearshift

message: Moving unsourced trivia to talk: 
The singer Lily Allen can be seen riding a chopper in the video for her song "LDN" and on the cover of her album Alright, Still.
Toddst1 (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Hello,
First time i've dropped by this article, but i'd like to clarify a few things.
My Grandfather, John Gordon, was the designer/draughtsman/inventor, whatever, of the Chopper. No websites state this, and this is because he died in 1978 from a heart attack - he was due to move to America at the time for i believe something related to the Chopper.
As an involved part, I would rather not edit the article to show this, as not only would it be a COI, I also do not have any hard sources that this is the case, apart from my dad's knowledge and memories of riding test models, making colour schemes and more!
Thanks,
BG7even 13:38, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several Incorrect Claims... 

message: The main fun in having a Chopper for a guy was the ability to "pop" a wheelie.  I remember after I learned how to ride a bike, all the guys would get together for wheelie popping contests.  Bets of candy were placed, with winner going home with a pocketful of sugar.User:JCHeverly 15:03, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheelies???
Talk:Open outcry

message: Minneapolis Grain Exchange is no longer on Open outcry as of December 19, 2008. Source: Grain Exchange to Stop Open Outcry  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuhrysteve (talk • contribs) 20:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Minneapolis Grain Exchange

message: A lot has changed since the article was first written in the context of a transition to electronic trading.  I believe that CME (Chicago) https://www.cmegroup.com/trading-hours.html with the open outcry trading hours described on that page is the only significant exchange globally to use open outcry.
My October 2019 review, shows New York, London, Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Seoul no longer have open outcry exchanges operating in these cities.  Please weigh in here if you are aware of a open outcry exchange other than CME. patsw (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite to reflect reality
Talk:The C++ Programming Language

message: I have removed the merge request with the article C++. This article is about the C++ Programming Language book, not the C++ Programming Language itself. Perhaps a name change to "The C++ Programming Language (Book)" is merited, but a merge with the completely unrelated article C++ is unwarranted. Billyoneal (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Request with C++
Talk:List of Korean drinks

message: What are ??? doing on the page? Citation needed tags are what I usually see on this website. Ron James 007 (talk) 08:50, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Klavierbüchlein für Wilhelm Friedemann Bach

message: It seems that there were two composers with these initials, Johann Christian and Johann Christoph. There's a short notice about it here: . I have no good source on which Richter composed the Allemande/Courante of Clavier-Büchlein for Wilhelm Friedemann, it'd be good if someone could find this out. Jashiin 13:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Christoph Wolff's Bach book, it was Johann Christoph Richter. --INM (talk) 04:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  J.C. Richter

message: We have some music files that I think would be appropriate in the Wikipedia article, including those at right.Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Music files
Talk:Wotton-under-Edge BT Tower

message: Wooton-under-Edge BT Tower → Wotton-under-Edge BT Tower – Rob.desbois 13:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Requested moves is only for contentious moves - if it's non-contentious you can just go ahead and move the page. David | Talk 18:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I would've done, but at the time WP would not allow me to perform a move; I think I had only just registered. Rob.desbois 14:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Boron trichloride

message: In my opinion the expression "The dimethyl sulfide adduct is safer to use, when possible." is useless for me (I'm not an chemist), as it is not stated in which case it could be used. From the given facts in both articles, I can't figure out any connection between BCl3 and DMS when looking at the properties, structures and behaviour. So either there should be an obvious common application, or it should be noted which property is substituted.
--LordPsycholus (talk) 12:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety
Talk:Soyuz TMA-10

message: *I think that the new way to present the crew adds useless complication. Hektor 14:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New crew list

message: Just a quick question regarding images from spacefacts.de; surely whether or not they allow the use of their images is irrelevant for us, as the images we use are originally sourced from NASA, so Spacefacts.de has absolutely no rights at all regarding what we do with the images, eg mission patches, etc.? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Colds7ream (talk • contribs) 13:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spacefacts.de Images 

message: The article currently describes TMA-10 as bringing, "two-thirds of ISS Expedition 15 to the space station." This doesn't seem correct. Won't there be a total of 5 people who at some point are members of Expedition 15? Sdsds 04:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratio of Expedition 15 Crewmembers 

message: The link to ballistics doesn't describe a ballistic trajectory so if you don't know how this differs from what normally happens, you have no clue what this section is talking about. Ballistics is just the study of how something moves without engines and I didn't think the engines were on when a rocket landed? Could we either clarify this article or mention what a ballistic trajectory is in the Ballistics article.  As written I don't understand it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.33.111.74 (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That internal link is to an unrelated topic. 66.28.178.68 16:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be good to use the article called Atmospheric reentry to explain the difference between ballistic entry and lifting/guided entry. Hektor 16:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on Ballistic Trajectory 
Template talk:Prod subcategory starter

message: This template is used as a boilplate to fill in text in newly created prod sub categories, do not delete this unless you know what you are doing! --Sherool (talk) 13:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use

message: I am currently operating DumbBOT to create the prod categories. Since the text it places in them is , please notify me if this template is moved (no need for doing that if it is only changed) - Liberatore(T) 10:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot

message: The text in this article is completely false information. There are no articles or references that support the information.
Meli.gonzo (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Furthermore, the page you want edited isn't even an article, so it's not supposed to have references. →Στc. 00:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from , 19 November 2011
Talk:Jeanne Tripplehorn

message: Man, would it kill you to get A BETTER Photo of Jeanne... Geez!!! (120.149.118.36 (talk) 11:47, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hilariously, half the edit history is people adding a photo and then the photo being deleted. And there is still...no...photo. 2601:18D:4501:6F61:5122:429E:F555:F961 (talk) 02:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Yes, The Atlantic noticed, in their list of bad Wikipedia headshots. Muzilon (talk) 11:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Better photo

message: Should this role in Jeanne's career not be commented upon in her career summary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.141.110.79 (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abigail McDeere 

message: The Career section needs cleanup due to absence or misuse of definite and indefinite article. (Fwiw, this is characteristic of a Russian editor.)  Mathglot (talk) 06:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career section needs cleanup
Talk:Wood/Water

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 22:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Most Hot 100 hit singles from an album

message: This article is formatted poorly, has multiple repeat-wikilinks and no categories.  It also has no sources - nowhere does it mention what chart this information comes from or which country.  It probably should be renamed if it is only going to feature United States statistics, unless information from other countries are added to the page. -- eo 14:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully objections are now satisfied.  I took off the cleanup tag.   Wasted Time R 21:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup tag

message: While wikilinks within section headers is usually a bad practice, here it's the only link to the albums in question.  I'm restoring them.   Wasted Time R 12:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wlinks in section titles

message: Neither of the additions of Saturday Night Fever that have been made here are valid.  The Bee Gees only had three new number one hits from the album, not five: "Jive Talkin'" and "Nights on Broadway" had been released two and a half years earlier, from a different album, and then were also included on the SNF soundtrack.  That's not the sense of this article at all; if we allowed these, this list would be dominated by greatest hits albums.
The same problem applies to the 'various artists' inclusions, along with a straight error: "Disco Inferno" by The Trammps did not make number one on the Billboard Hot 100, only number 11.   Wasted Time R 12:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article has three lists, but as explained above, SNF doesn't qualify for any of them.   Wasted Time R 11:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Saturday Night Fever

message: You forgot "life is what you make it" which would bring its total number of hot 100 songs to ten.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.204.118.242 (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hannah montana wins
Talk:Sprite Ice

message: The file :File:Chinaspritecans.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Chinaspritecans.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Chinaspritecans.jpg]]
Talk:.41 Short

message: Why was this page removed?
:Please remember to sign your posts.  Kartano (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I've requested permission to use an image of the .41 short from the Ammo One online store.  Hopefully I'll hear back soon from the author with permission to use the image.  Kartano (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: I found this in Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.41_rimfire
Are these the same? Jokem (talk) 03:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate Article? 

message: "According to Cartridges of the World, the .41 Rimfire consisted of a 130 grain (8.4 g) lead bullet propelled by 13 grains (0.8 g) of black powder in its original load.  The round produced a muzzle velocity of 425 feet per second (130 m/s) and a  muzzle energy of 52 foot-pounds force (71 J).  However, more recently firearms writer Holt Bodinson has disputed these findings.  He states that his testing showed the 130 grain bullet traveled at 685 feet per second (209 m/s) so producing 111 foot-pounds force (150 J) of energy - a significant difference in ballistic energy from the earlier tests.  The difference in findings can potentially be attributed to variances in the specific ammunition fired or measuring equipment used."
The equation for Kinetic Energy is 1/2 mv^2.
For the first calculation of the energy: 1/2 x 0.0084 kg x (130 m/s)^2 = 70.98 Joules ... so "71 J" is correct.
For the second calculation of the energy: 1/2 x 0.0084 kg x (209 m/s)^2 = 183.46 Joules ... so "150 J" is incorrect.
[I do not have access to the original data to know whether the result (150 J) is wrong or the stated velocity (209 m/s) is wrong.]
Atpollard (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the error.  In the source article, the "685 feet per second (209 m/s)" was for the .38 S&W and not the .41 Short.  The correct velocity from the article cited should be 621 fps (189 m/s) which yields 111 ft-lbs (150 J). Atpollard (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arithmetic error?
Talk:Kamehameha Schools Hawaii Campus

message: I was wondering, would this article be better entitled Kamehameha Schools Kea'au Campus? Kukini 14:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps yes, since the island is always confused with the state. (although style guidelines say avoid 'okina in title) However, they do call themselves the "Hawaii Campus" according to their web site W Nowicki (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Decomposition method (constraint satisfaction)

message: To do:
* condition equivalent to hypergraph acyclicity this is said in tree clustering; move above?
* clique-width 
* computing width and decomposition (cost, LOGCFL)
* other structural restrictions: anything to add?
* algorithms for the resulting acyclic problems: something else to be mentioned here?
- Liberatore(T) 19:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the example was wrong and took the liberty to change the image. --84.114.18.215 (talk) 21:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Children's non-fiction literature

message: good page.  we should rename it and the accompanying catgories and lists according to wp conventions and flesh it out.  i'm happy to work on fleshing it out.  It looks like Non-fiction is the wp convention, so we should rename the article and put in redirects (and link from the appropriate places). Deborah-jl Talk 14:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: naming
Talk:Lama Foundation

message: I wonder- does it matter if the title is Lama foundation instead of Lama Foundation? 
Is this all case-sensitive? Divb 14:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is the mission of the Lama Foundation? The article probably should state this. --ElectricEye 12:39, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission 

message: I lived there from my birth (1969) until my father moved away about 7 years later. I've always heard that it's mission was "the search for spiritual truth" but in the fires that destroyed many of the building and caused the community to be reformed, that mission may have shifted a bit. While I agree not everywhere I've lived needs an entry in an encyclopedia, this one warrants and entry for a variety of reasons, not the least is that it was a notable place in the Southwest for people on a spiritual quest in the 60's and 70's. 
With regards to the whole discussion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Lama_Foundation I'm puzzled. The discussion seems to question the existence of this place or it's relevance in an Encyclopedia.
I can assure you that I and numerous other very real people lived there - in fact referred to as "lama beans" (a play I think on human being - aka human beans). Since it ended up being a keep, that's great, and thanks to the good folks who updated it - lots more could be added. My step-father and aunt actually founded the place - but how do you write that stuff up (information i get from them orally) and have it be "referenceable"?
icky 20:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legitimacy of Article
Talk:Peter van Bohlen

message: The entry Bohlen, Peter von in Nuttalls Encyclopaedia is definitively wrong. Gerhard51 18:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nuttall

message: All the references I've seen call him Peter von Bohlen, so the name here and at German Wikipedia of Peter van Bohlen is a bit mysterious to me.  I'll play along for now.  Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:John W. Jones (ex-slave)

message: I would like to change the title to John W. Jones (abolitionist) this better describes him as a person rather than an object that someone once owned  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.48.8.197 (talk) 00:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

message: The text is lifted from . However, the article's original author User:Souldrifter02, says he's the webmaster of city of Elmira. We should check with him to see whether he has the copyright to that particular page (it's not listed on his user page as one of "his"). --Qviri (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, that will suffice. I removed the copyvio notices and the links, and we should be good to go. Thanks for your cooperation and understanding :) --Qviri (talk) 01:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

text: No problem- I wasn't offended...I'm impressed by your diligence.  I've been meaning to do more on the articles that I've contributed to, but I haven't had a great deal of time lately.  Souldrifter 01:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio? 
Talk:Equifax

message: As a relative newbie editor, I don't feel like taking it upon myself to remove the template without some consultation. There's been a lot of editing on this topic since the template was put up a year+ ago. To me, the article does not read like an advertisement and references appear to be in keeping with protocol. While no doubt many feel there's "more to the story" -- I personally know people who believe "the truth" is far deeper and darker than has been revealed -- this article seems informative to the general encyclopedia-reader looking for information about the company. So...time to remove the template? I'd like to do it myself just for practice, but of course do not insist on that. --Jhoughton1 (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been more than two years since this comment and dozens of edits later.  To my eyes, this article doesn't read like an advertisement. I will be bold and remove it.  If someone disagrees, please put it back and add your reasoning here. --Replysixty (talk) 20:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to remove maintenance template? 

message: Hi, I’ve added the “criticism” section back to describe the issues around data collection and the name change. I’m open to renaming this section to something like Name Change Controversy? Also, if you are going to remove this section , this would be for the third time, at least be civil enough to post on this talk thread. It was discussed that the editing users were utilizing IP ranges from the corporate network (see edit history). Patrick Fleischman (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism