Template talk:Ffd notice

message: 
Substituting this will prevent it being broken when it is substituted. Alphax τεχ 08:06, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to use 

message: Hi Burgundavia, I noticed you've changed Template:Idw-pui to have a very light background, and to include the full image name (with namespace) as parameter. While these are possibly good things (and I  can see the benefit of the parameter change),  is now out-of-synch with  and . Should the other two be changed, or this one changed back? Please reply to this section. Thanks, Alphax τεχ 08:08, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  &#123;&#123;[[template:idw-pui|idw-pui]]&#125;&#125; (reply &rarr;) 

message: This template was nominated for deletion at WP:TFD.  The consensus was to keep it.  See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Not deleted/August 2005.  dbenbenn | talk 20:06, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion nomination 

message: I just made . --SPUI (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been three months... and no one has used it! --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

text: What's the point?  If a user on the Commons uploads an image, and it gets listed at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests, the nominator is supposed to use Commons:Template:Idw on the Commons user's talk page.  dbenbenn | talk 01:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the case, then...  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons

message: Template:Idw-commons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Idw-commons. Thank you. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:Idw-commons 

message: For the recent "vandalism" of the IDW template.  For some reason, when I hit edit on a user talk page, it redirected me to the template.  CQJ 06:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry

message: An older version of this template included a border and a background colour.  I've removed them to make this comment on people's talk pages the same as normal comments on people's talk pages.  Contributions using this template are no more special than non-template contributions of wikipedians, and so they no not deserve highlighted status on my talk page.  Gronky 14:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed obnoxious html 

message: This template adds a ~~~~ signature; however, the instructions (at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion#Listing images and media for deletion) indicate that a signature also be used outside of the template. The result is that a signature is added twice. I noticed in the recent history that Remember the dot removed this, then Howcheng reverted this edits with the message "usage is consistent with other image notification templates". I think that it is silly that a template should embed a signature, and if it is indeed "consistent with other image notification templates", then they should all be updated to remove this signature, since I don't see any reason why this should happen. +mt 22:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double signatures 

message: There is only an option to opt out of bot messages.  Not all image deletion warnings are left by bots, so I have removed that offer. Superm401 - Talk 05:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opt out 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Cfd-notify which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 22:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Afd notice which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 02:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: This seems to be producing double signatures when notifying about nominating a file for deletion, this template seems to include a signature, but Twinkle already appends one, and I don't think other message templates include the signature. I only think  needs to be removed, but I don't want to break anything. Dylsss(talk contribs) 20:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double signatures? 

message: Similar to other templates like , please add a  or  parameter in the event we are trying to use this template for a discussion that is not dated today. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date