lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bible thumper

message: I removed the redirect to Christian Fundamentalism. It's not appropriate to link an insult to the target of an insult without explaining that it is in fact an insult. Also mentioned its dual use as the name of a piece of software, and restored the etymology from the original revision of the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jet57 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This subject is bound to attract non-NPOV sentiments, but a notable example of this "aggression" would be the Kansas evolution hearings. Whilst different people would have different standards for what constitutes "aggressive", a rough indicator IMHO is when there is a clear, religious (or anti-religious) agenda in a medium or social situation that would not normally warrant it. For example, talking about the merits of Christianity to a stranger at a bar would seem aggressive (most people there are just trying to relax at the end of the day), whilst doing the same to a close friend whilst the subject of Christianity has been brought up, is not. C xong (talk) 07:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Atheists don't go door-to-door trying to convert religious people to their non-belief in religion. Christians do. I don't call them "Bible-thumpers," I call them "Bible-pounders." I heard the Yancy Tucker character on The Waltons television show use the term to refer to tent-revivalists. Sd31263 (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

message: Is is possible or likely that the term "bible thumper" may have either originated or spread during the career of Christian fundamentalist and evangelist Billy Sunday? I have seem films of his sermons that show him holding a bound volume in one hand and hitting it with the other in a sort of emphatic cadence with his speech.
69BookWorM69 (talk) 16:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the term
Talk:Pyramid Breweries

message: This beer must be filled with impurities. Every time I drink it I get a tumor-like headache.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.26.53 (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Headache Inducer

message: This link (#1) in the references section gives a page not found error:
"Pyramid Breweries to be acquired by Magic Hat"
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/6420ap_magic_hat_pyramid.html  96.245.15.203 (talk) 07:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Reference Link
Talk:Widmer Brothers Brewery

message: http://seattlepi.com/business/339489_beer14.html --Lukobe (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that a company merger alone justifies merging the articles, although it certainly warrants explanation that they are owned by a single parent company.  In general, I see a trend on wikipedia that I strongly disapprove of, which is that people will make a page for a parent company and then try to merge information on individual brands into that parent company, and often delete information in the process.  I think that parent companies, in the long run, aren't particularly important--to the public, it is the brand and the beers it makes that matters (or other types of food product, or other products).  This is especially true in cases where the parent company is only for administrative purposes and each child company still retains local production.  Cazort (talk) 02:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  From the looks of the article this is a new entity and as such should probably have it's own page with Redhook and Widmer sections and redirects from both company pages. Neither article has been expanded much anyway.Awotter (talk) 06:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger w/redhook 

message: *https://pdx.eater.com/2019/1/22/18193292/widmer-brothers-brewpub-tap-room-closing
---Another Believer (Talk) 22:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure
Talk:Redhook Ale Brewery

message: It doesn't seem like a Nasdaq listed company with 200,000+ barrels of beer production in two states counts as "micro." Redhook is officially termed as a Craft Brewer, the largest in the country. 
why expand tag 
article needs more history about combany and maybe tells us more about the brewery whould be niceOo7565 21:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a Microbrewery? 

message: http://seattlepi.com/business/339489_beer14.html -- Lukobe (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger with widmers 
Talk:Hamm's Brewery

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Burgermeister Beer. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 28#Burgermeister Beer until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Burgermeister Beer" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: ? 174.255.1.92 (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheres hamms racing? 

message: There is no reference to prior advertising campaigns and a project I’m working on has hit on the “Leads them All” slogan of the 1930’s
The article should include pre-bear history and advertising
Does anyone have a source for the material in question? 206.246.31.172 (talk) 14:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What years was the slogan “Leads Them All” was in use
Talk:Gordon Biersch Brewing Company

message: How come no mention of the closing of local stores/breweries ? ? ?
Supposedly the closing of four or five locations was announced on February 10, 2020.
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closures
Talk:Season of the Sakura

message: Home of the Underdogs lists this game as being from 1992 (the Japanese version, I assume). How, then, could there be any references to Evangelion when that didn't exist until 1995? The similarities are striking, yes, but if anything, that would mean the opposite - that (part of) Evangelion was inspired by Season of the Sakura. --Pidgeot (t) (c) (e) 16:31, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind - I've done some more research and it appears it's an error on HOTU - no other pages claim it was released in '92. --Pidgeot (t) (c) (e) 20:01, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been marked as needing cleanup for a year. Is there any cleanup still required? I'm inclined to remove the cleanup notice if not. --AlexChurchill (talk) 12:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup? 

message: This article should mention where the reference to Secret of the Blue Water is, or remove that part from the article. I don't remember having seen it in my many playthroughs. 84.121.141.24 (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I've been playing it over the holidays and haven't found anything that could be such a reference. Might be something subtle, though. Since it's unconfirmed, I'm removing it from the Introductory section. If someone can find it, put the information in the 'Other' section.CFLeon (talk) 04:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The game references tons of anime, some more subtly than others. I believe some were confirmed on the offical forum by Peter Payne, but i don't remember what.じんない 21:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nadia Reference?
Talk:Lawrie Quinn

message: Just removed the description of his defeat in 2005 as being "unexpected". Truth be told his election in the first place was what was surprising as Scarborough & Whitby isn't traditional Labour territory, and it was not in the least surprising that as the Labour tide receded the constituency would revert to type. -- Arwel 16:35, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas Eleven

message: On April 28, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Redistricting warrant. The result was keep. —Xezbeth 16:35, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
I removed the following from the page:
:In the Texas Senate, the lieutenant governor broke precedent by letting something not supported by a two-thirds majority come to a vote. For example, the vote to arrest the Democrats legislators without a court signed warrant was enacted without the required quorum.
The vote with less than two-thirds present does not break precedent, as you will see from Article III §10 of the Texas Constitution:
:Two-thirds of each House shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner and under such penalties as each House may provide.
Thus the Senate can legally adopt a motion to arrest their own members even if two-thirds are not present. Pmadrid 20:04, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for deletion

message: Is there compelling reason for the article to be called Texas Ten when the article itself refers to the group as either the Texas Eleven or the Texas Eleven Minus One? — Bellhalla 04:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. I nearly slapped a  on it for that. I suggest you move it. 68.39.174.238 05:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title: Texas Ten?
Talk:Springer (EP)

message: *Oppose. This is a technicality: album or mini-album. Naming uniformity is more important. Mikkalai 19:40, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to [[Springer (EP)]]
Talk:Social construction of technology

message: I've made an attempt to get the ball rolling here by putting up a short explanation of the theory.  It does not include everything.  I've made no mention of the epirical program of relativism, and I don't think that my notes on closure do the theory justice.  But something is here now, and my hope is that this section will be revised.  
I'm also not happy with my formatting, but that's something to fix for another day.--RedJ 17 16:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Theory 

message: * Importance of three key aspects of Technological Constructivism: Technical, Social, and Natural factors related to the development of a technology. +Fullerian 00:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: I think a chunk of text may have gone missing from the 2nd paragraph, where it jumps from "historical analysis of sociotechnical systems" to :Thomas P. Hughes. I took a quick look at the edit history to see if I could spot where it might have happened, but that didn't help. Could somebody who's familiar with the article please have a look and try to fix the problem? Cgingold 05:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: the edit that caused the problem seems to be this one. I'll see if I can't salvage it somehow. Tarheelcoxn (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing text? 

message: Describing actor-network theory as a subtopic of SCOT without qualification seems problematic. I can certainly believe some SCOT adherents use an ANT methodology, but ANT itself is not usually seen from that perspective, since one of its whole points is that inanimate objects can get equal footing in the network. Latour, anyway, tends to take a more materialist view of technology. --Delirium (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANT as a subtopic? 

message: Let's discuss this at Talk:Social_shaping_of_technology. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Social shaping of technology]]
Talk:Skin Yard (album)

message: I created this article on the Skin Yard article.  I wish for it to stay there.  There is no need for it to have its own article, the band no longer exists and was never very notable. At a later date, if the one article becomes too large, it can be broken up then. --Silversmith 18:14, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Chistorra

message: I'm not sure this deserves it's own entry...more likely a section or mention in Chorizo and a redirect.  Here are some examples of why I think this   I'll let this sit a few days, and if there are no comments, will edit chorizo appropriately and redirect from here. Wikibofh 17:17, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. And shopping sites are probably not the best sources to use when trying to prove your point, especially those catering to non-Spanish natives. Chistorra is not a chorizo. The corizo article doesn't even mention chistorra, so the redirect was actually misleading. Have removed the redirect and written an article. Please feel free to argue. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû 21:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: "This is a common breakfast dish."  I live in Spain, which doesn't make me an expert, but I've never, ever seen chistorra eaten for breakfast.  This is not mentioned in the Spanish version of this section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.17.214.81 (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I never ate it while in Spain either. Frankly it treads awful close to WP:WEASEL, so I have removed the sentence in question. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 12:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  For breakfast?
Talk:Geography of Somalia

message: Can someone have a look at the article Sarcade and expand it. Thanks. --Eleassar777 17:18, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page links to the disambiguation page Corn, but I'm not sure which sense is intended.  Can you help?  Thanks. — Pekinensis 4 July 2005 16:03 (UTC)
I'm guessing that because the text originally came from a US source, that maize is meant. — Pekinensis 05:02, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corn 

message: Does anyone think from the coordinates down should be at the top of the page below the picture? If so could you do it ? If not I will! Thanks!--DarkZorro 17:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Facts

message: why is there literally no info on the somali desert this is literally the only reason i came on wikipedia because wikipedia is stupid 97.125.58.6 (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  somali desert
Talk:Johnny Mnemonic

message: could someone please fill in when and where the story first appeared? (clem 17:25, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: Why isn't this article just simply titled Johnny Mnemonic? the (short story) tail doesn't need to be there. ArdClose (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason, well spotted. Why didn't you just move it? ;) the skomorokh 13:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Why is the plot so different than what I watched recently on Netflix?  It seems to be the same movie...
ZirePhoenix (talk) 17:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: The data capacities referenced in the novel and movie are obviously quickly becoming obsolete. The 80Gb storage in Johnny's head is pretty paltry these days. Even the 320Gb information overload in the story's year 2021 is relatively small compared to today's 4Tb hard drives.  Powerslide (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gigabytes 

message: Sadly the link in the first reference fails with the Internet Archive reporting that,
"This item is no longer available. Items may be taken down for various reasons, including by decision of the uploader or due to a violation of our Terms of Use". 147.148.92.173 (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Signy Research Station

message: NPOV flag since British viewpoint not presented. Samw 18:04, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide references?  Sorry I'm not British nor Argentinian so I'm not familar with either "BAS" nor "Mr Bruce".  Thanks. Samw 00:55, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Global village (Internet)

message: what are the diiferent ways that "glabal village" is used in the internet??
This article is horribly and sparsely sourced. --134.220.190.41 22:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In my copy (1962) of the Gutenberg Galaxy, where "global village" appears twice p.31
the first time in the body of a text, the second time in the succeeding Chapter gloss,
there is no capitalization.
--Михал Орела 06:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the claim that global village is always capitalized in the Gutenberg Galaxy is wrong 

message: I agree, let's go ahead and merge them, but I think that this page should become a subsection of that page. mDuo13 (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Global Village (term)
Talk:Philippe Garrel

message: This article was proposed for deletion; the result was to keep, which can be seen at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Philippe Garrel.  Postdlf 18:38, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Askafroa

message: I am not sure how/if to edit, so instead I would like to add here that under popular appearances, the TTRPG Vaesen features this creature as Ash Tree Wife. Also on the games cover. The game deals with industrialization clashing with scandinavian mythology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.84.36.134 (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Vaesen RPG
Talk:Boilermaker

message: Are you sure that's a statue of a boilermaker? To me, it looks like George C. Scott portraying George S. Patton in the epic 1970 film Patton. If I had more power here, I'd check that out. Alas, I am but a lowly lay WP contributor and lack the political torque to affect real change, photo-authenticity-wise. I have also—and this is no coincidence, I assure you—just consumed a boilermaker of the mixological variety, which has not helped my judgment regarding Discussion posts, but which does seem to have enhanced my powers of photo suspicion. – AndyFielding (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Patton had trousers.  I'd agree though that it conveys nothing to this article. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statue authenticity? 
Talk:Peanut butter cup

message: I don't think the blurb on Reese's variations belongs here. The variants are already covered in Reese's Peanut Butter Cup.
Jax184 13:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

message: This is absolutely ridiculous and unacceptable.  Reese's Pieces have always been subpar candies in comparison with any Reese Peanut Butter Cups.  I've always resented that Pieces were allowed to run with the Reese banner since the product is so inferior.  NWO-Wolfpac 03:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the list of Reese's candy from the page because it doesn't belong here, but rather at Reese's Peanut Butter Cup. — Saxifrage ✎ 18:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning: Reese's Pieces are NOT Peanut Butter Cups! 

message: No need for this separate stub article - Reese's  covers the topic quite well.  Can add a sentence about Palmer and be done with it. Tvoz |talk 22:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Swedish Social Democratic Party

message: The article says:
: When this did not work any longer in the early 90's, the party was blamed for irresponsibility and between 1991-1994 lost its place as leading party of Sweden.
But Elections_in_Sweden states that the party had 37.6% of the votes in 1991 voted Social Democrats, whereas the second party, the Moderate Party, had only 21.9%. What is meant by 'lost its place as leading party'? I replaced leading by governing. If this is incorrect, please explain what is. Gerrit CUTEDH 11:17, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. In 1991, four right/center parties formed a coalition government with a total of 46.6 % of votes, with Carl Bildt , from Moderaterna , as prime mininster. So the social democrats lost their place as governing party of Sweden. So you are correct in the change. --Fred-Chess 12:55, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost its place as leading party? 

message: Originally "Arbetarepartiet–Socialdemokraterna ('The Workers' Party – The Social Democrats')" was "Arbetarepartiet–Socialdemokraterna ('Workers' Party – Social Democrats')." I changed it so that the English translation is in the definite as well. I am not a Swedish native speaker, so I just want to make sure this is okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.226.62.34 (talk) 18:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Grammar 

message: Should rename the page from Swedish Social Democratic Party to Social Democrats (Sweeden)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.50.47 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Swedish Social Democratic Party is the official name so I doubt it'll be changed ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename it as Social Democrats (Sweeden) 

message: Immigration is one of the most important issues in Europe, yet this page makes no mention of the word. 140.251.127.34 (talk) 21:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not one of the main focal policy points of S/SAP, but if you want to add something and you have good sources, you're more than welcome to add it. ZlatanSweden10 (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of immigration position?
Talk:Postdigital

message: needs to be more encyclopedic and wikified. It may be a copyvio from  but I have a hunch that the author of that page is the original submitter to Wikipedia. Rhobite
: Postdigital manifesto is here:
: http://bluwiki.com/go/Postdigitala
: --Kim Bruning (talk) 04:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

message: Hi, I don't know how to link the translations on Portuguese and Polish Wikipedias to this article. They exist with the same name "Postdigital". I would appreciate some help on this. Thank you. Flávia Rodrigues Piątkiewicz (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages 
Talk:Fălticeni

message: This is a discussion, moved from Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English, about a somewhat strange sequence of edits. Physchim62 characterizes it as an "abusive edit":
:Not sure what language this is. It would appear that the contents of the article are duplicated (ie. the original language and then English). The English translation is not quite there yet. More importantly, I think it may be a copyright violation. --TheParanoidOne 18:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's Romanian.  I can't find the original on the web if it's a copyright violation.  — Gulliver ✉ 18:26, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find an original on the web either. As for the source citation, the Romanian online booksellers I tried had no books from the publishing house more recent than 1991. Romanian wikipedia does not have an article on Falticeni. Have contacted a Romanian ambassador to see what (s)he thinks. Physchim62 19:53, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Abusive edit. The text was inserted 4 Apr 2005 by 83.103.148.126, completely replacing a more encyclopedic article about the town. Article reverted to earlier version. Physchim62 10:27, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Abusive edit