Talk:Brief Encounter

message: This looks like part of someone's research paper--which is fine, but why don't you set up an account, 80.108.19.xxx, so we can address you by name (or nym)?  We bark occasionally, but rarely bite.  :-) This is interesting work, and I'd be interested to see what else you have to write.  --KQ 16:26 Aug 22, 2002 (PDT)
Well, it isn't part of a research paper, but thanks anyway. And yes, I'm going to log in properly. By the way, what's wrong with my apostrophes? Isn't this ´ just as good as this ' ?
Kurt aka 80.108.19.76
OK, I´ve set up an account as KF.
I'm confused. Does she go into town once a week, as first stated in the synopsis, or once a month?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.108.194.149 (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Research paper

message: Someone changed Laura and Alec throughout to Mrs Jesson and Dr Harvey. To me, this makes the tone a bit too formal, even though this is an encyclopaedia. And surely the characters addressed each other as Laura and Alec? (I can't be certain as it's over 30 years since I saw the film, so am happy to be corrected.) Hence I've reverted.--A bit iffy (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would generally support your revert. The intimate nature of the characters' relationship suggests a first-name basis here and better reflects the tone of the film. --RayBirks (talk) 21:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made them all "Dr Harvey" and "Mrs Jesson" as that is how the characters would wish to be known; they use both their formal titles and Christian names to each other in the film. The article, as is, uses both versions inconsistently. On another note, the article is a little overwrought in its summary of the plot - I hope the name-formalisation highlighted this. 121.44.197.252 (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I can see a couple of cases where "Dr Harvey" is used instead of "Alec". I really can't remember now exactly how the characters did address each other. Also, I think I see what you mean by "overwrought" here. Any ideas how to improve the summary? Thanks.--A bit iffy (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that this is a work of fiction, and Wikipedia does not use courtesy titles. ProhibitOnions (T) 08:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Perhaps we should change all the references at this link to Ms. Drew? (not). --RayBirks (talk) 18:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support the use of first names in the plot outline as they refer to eachother that way in the film. Vertovian (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Laura and Alec, or Mrs Jesson and Dr Harvey?

message: :: All scenes in Still Life are set in the refreshment room of a railway station (the fictional Milford Junction).
There was a Milford Junction railway station if that is relavent..Prof.Haddock (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Milford

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Brief Encounter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090122214331/http://kneehigh.co.uk:80/shows/brief-encounter/tour-dates.php to http://www.kneehigh.co.uk/shows/brief-encounter/tour-dates.php
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090330073220/http://www.houstongrandopera.org:80/page.aspx?pageid=12017629 to http://www.houstongrandopera.org/page.aspx?pageid=12017629
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Pettigrew, in "Trevor Howard: A Personal Biography" claims Celia Johnson was paid £12,000 for the film whilst Trevor Howard received just £500. However, Pettigrew contains some blatant errors (not least that Guy Gibson's VC was "posthumous") so there must be doubt without further evidence. The disparity is enormous and the claimed fee for Johnson seems outrageously high for a country in serious austerity. Any reliable evidence most welcome.PDAWSON3 (talk) 04:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stars' fees 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Brief Encounter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110114054813/http://www.playbill.com:80/news/article/146243-Broadways-Brief-Encounter-a-Romance-With-Theatrical-Lift-Ends-Jan-2 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/146243-Broadways-Brief-Encounter-a-Romance-With-Theatrical-Lift-Ends-Jan-2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091006202703/http://www.act-sf.org:80/0910/briefencounter/index.html to http://www.act-sf.org/0910/briefencounter/index.html
*Added  tag to http://www.britmovie.net/British-film-Locations/brief-encounter-1945.html
*Added  tag to http://ia700301.us.archive.org/11/items/OTRR_Academy_Award_Theater_Singles/Academy_Award_46-11-20_ep35_Brief_Encounter.mp3
*Added  tag to http://ia700508.us.archive.org/0/items/ScreenGuildTheater/Sgt_48-01-26_ep372_Brief_Encounter.mp3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brief Encounter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091006202703/http://www.act-sf.org/0910/briefencounter/index.html to http://www.act-sf.org/0910/briefencounter/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.britmovie.net/British-film-Locations/brief-encounter-1945.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I removed the See Also section. Only one item in that section (BFI 100 British Films) had any relevance to this article. I put that item in the Critical Reception section instead; it made no sense to have a See Also link yet not have the distinction mentioned anywhere in the article. Another link was to an article about Banbury cakes. Since Banbury cakes are not mentioned in this article, and this movie is not mentioned in the Banbury cakes article, what would be the point of a See Also link? The reader would have no idea why they were directed there. The other three items were links to articles on movies or books that apparently have plots that are vaguely, partly similar to the plot of this movie. This seemed pointless. And--are See Also sections even a thing? Sylvia A (talk) 21:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed See Also

message: The lede states that the film is about "British suburban life at the end of World War 2". However the plot states "In the latter months of 1938". They can't both be right. Which is correct please? Zin92 (talk) 13:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I now see that user 86.181.119.186 recently changed "on the eve of World War 2" to "at the end of World War 2" with the explanation "1945 not 'the eve of World War 2'". I think that they are confusing the year that the film was made (1945) with the year that the film is set in. Unless anybody objects, I'm going to change it back to "on the eve of World War 2". Zin92 (talk) 13:09, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Zin92 (talk) 06:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The film drops strong hints of a late 1938 setting. It's obviously before the war, and the fictional film within a film that Laura and Alec see, Flames of Passion, displays a copyright date of 1938, meaning it could not have been any earlier. When Laura returns home following the first (and last) scene, her daughter wishes to see a pantomime, suggesting a setting in time during the weeks around, and probably before Christmas (the celebrations of which are not mentioned). -ProhibitOnions (T) 17:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: In what year is the film set?

message: The last sentence of the Adaptation section, from "Still Life", has a unreferenced condition.  It refers to a Bibliography, but there is no bibliography in this article.  Does anyone know if it refers to some bibliography of Coward's somewhere else on Wikipedia?  Or is it just a missing reference? Johngillis (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is Bibliography? 

message: Moved:
The Channel 4 British drama series Shameless has a plot based on Brief Encounter in its fifth series. Similarities include the main character Frank Gallagher getting grit in his eye from a bus, being caught by a friend of his wife, and experiencing the tearful departure. Frank's wife Monica even thanks Frank for coming back.
Brief Encounter also loosely inspired "Mum's Army", an episode of the British comedy series Dad's Army. There is a similar final scene in a railway station.
I couldn't locate reliable sources. If you can find sources for these, please feel free to add them back in. - Popoki35 (talk) 14:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material Requiring Sources