Talk:Information technology management

message: Some upper-lower case writings of IT Management would redirect to Management Information Systems. I corrected that.
And I will add the reason to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emrekenci (talk • contribs) 10:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection Corrected

message: Taking silence for agreement, I've started restructuring this page as given below. Richard Rannard (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New list of headings 

message: 1) List of main IT Management Concepts (We can reference Making IT Happen and Gartner here)
I think this part is essential can go to the article right away. Perhaps a more appropriate title can be found.
2)
3)
--Emre Kenci (talk) 13:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Of Headings 

message: As the Main Concepts are covering almost everything we can reference to IT Management there's no need to make a See Also section.
I deleted that section. If we have a good reason to have it back in the future then we can.--Emre Kenci (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted See Also Section 

message: Emre, you are right; I've deleted the empty sections.  The table of contents is a good idea, can you show me how?Richard Rannard (talk) 10:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC
The table of contents for articles are automatically generated after a sufficient amount of headings are created (I think it's 5, I'm not sure). But what I mean is we should create a list of headings that should go under IT Management and try to provide some content for those headings. We can create a list here in the talk page and as we fill under those we can move them into the article. I absolutely have no idea what the elements of the list should be right now. We need to think. --Emre Kenci (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted empty sections 

message: I find the new organization of the page a little awkward. Because under the headings are empty, and it would not make any sense if we fill under them because each heading also have their own articles. We'd just be repeating what is already told in those articles.
If there are practices we can place under IT Management that do not have their own pages we should create those articles instead of explaining them under IT Management.
So I think we should think about a table of contents for this page. If we create a list of heading we must fill it could guide us.
We need the guidance because IT Management is such a broad term. --Emre Kenci (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content Organization 

message: The book Making IT Happen: Critical Issues in IT Management is a good reference for this article. Thank you for the input Richard. I already ordered it from amazon.com. Please add this article to your watch list so we can continue to collaborate.
--Emre Kenci (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Reference

message: Added a few links and rearranged the page.124.170.143.32 (talk) 00:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Aligning IT with the Business 

message: Following on from Emre Kenci, I made a minor change, replacing the dot-point "Risk Management" to the link "IT risk".  First time I've edited Wikipedia!  Please keep contributing to this article. (Later) I changed "Security Management" to the link "IT Security".
--RR (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor edit

message: As I had announced before, I completely replaced this page. The old page had no references. And, as stated below,
It was a direct paste from a study posted on acm.org. The study is a student paper, possibly a homework from a university in Bangalore (MBA, Ibs-Bangalore). The paper defines IT Management without any inline citations. And the references stated at the end of the study also do not include a definition of IT Management. So we can conclude that the definition which was posted on this page is those students'  ideas. My definition is very poor at the moment I know. But it's reliable and properly referenced. Please contribute to this article.
--Emre Kenci (talk) 13:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Renewal

message: I will replace this page with a new IT Management definition because of obvious reasons.
Anyone interested in making a contribution to my study can go to my user page (That's where I'm writing the draft). Thank you.
--Emre Kenci (talk) 14:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redefinition

message: The main article on :management currently links to this article, so it would be great if someone could take the time to expand and polish it this. I'm removing the stub tag and tagging it for expansion.  --SueHay 15:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to main management article

message: The text in this article as of today (4th April 2008) is a direct paste from http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/pf/v8i08_lalith.pdf and may be in violation of copyright laws.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.64.6 (talk) 08:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?

message: The original source of the text was a poorly referenced paper.  The paper had a list of references but in the body of the text only TWO! statements were attributed.  The rest of the paper consisted of unfounded opinion, supposition and lacked any real academic rigour.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.134.3.54 (talk) 03:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Worse Still

message: ICT Standard Forum has created a open source, free to use ICT Standard for Management framework that shows how to run IT like a business. The community homapage is at www.ictstandard.org. It's an umbrella to most existing 'de facto' standards, but is more complete and written in language that also busienss leadership understands. Any comments? Should it be added as a reference to IT mgmt wiki information?Globaltka (talk) 07:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New open standard for managing IT like a business 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Information technology management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113094920/http://www.thectoforum.com/content/converged-infrastructure-0 to http://www.thectoforum.com/content/converged-infrastructure-0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified