Talk:Buckcherry

message: This band has been linked to numerous stories about leaking its own music for PR. While not the most reliable source, here is a link of what I'm talking about:
http://torrentfreak.com/band-leaks-track-to-bittorrent-blames-pirates-080731/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.30.125 (talk) 19:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: First off, I must say that calling anything "sleaze" in an article is POV.
This is from the "Sound" section
On their debut record, they successfully treaded heavy metal territory while managing to stay hard rock, while on Time Bomb, the band took their sleaze to an extreme with an excess of profanity and attitude.
With 15, Buckcherry has continued their decadent, glam metal inspired sleaze, ignoring popular trends in music.
::I agree, "sleaze" should probably be edited out.  This is an encyclopedia, not a Rolling Stone music review.--H.al-shawaf 22:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sleaze" Usage

message: Anyone care to clarify why an American band released their third album so much earlier in Japan than in the US?
Blocky 02:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan 

message: Shouldn't 'Lit Up' count as their 1st hit, not 'Crazy Bitch'?
Well "Lit up" was a mainstream rock hit but "Crazy Bitch" is their first real hit" It hit 3 on mainstream rock , 13 on modern rock and I think 40 something on the billboard , it's a bigger overall hit. But in someways you're right. It's what first got them noticed and on charts.
Even though it wasn't as big overall, "Lit Up" was bigger on mainstream rock, hitting #1 for 3 weeks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.42.164 (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Crazy Bitch

message: What's going on around the bottom third of the page? I see what looks like a mass marketing attempt. Can someone sort out what's part of the Wiki and what's been added? Gwrtheyrn 20:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tell me about it. I came across this page, looked at the history... dear god. It's okay now, but I'll watch it from here on in. --Dayn 03:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Severe Vandalism/Marketing

message: :Image:Buckcherry Time Bomb cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Buckcherry Time Bomb cover.jpg

message: :Image:Buckcherry Buckcherry cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Buckcherry Buckcherry cover.jpg

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 18:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use criteria

message: This is a comprehensive website exclusively for Buckcherry and Josh Todd.....Please take a look, the website is:
www.thebattlehasjustbegun.com
Enjoy!
Ocelotcat 21:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buckcherry Website 

message: Shouldn't Buckcherry be listed as an Alternative rock band as well as Hard Rock? I dunno, I am having a hard time figuring out what is alternative or not. To me almost every rock band that came up in the 90s is alternative. They are often played on the altenative format radio station here. Alternative rock is way too broad... but i love it. lol. (Tigerghost 10:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ??? 

message: Buckcherry is a very dangerous because they will harm the rights of girls as free men. I nevr heard of this band before but when a very depressed girl on instant messaging from the US told me about this band I was really shocked what is happening in a free country like the USA. Because I cannot see a crying girl I asked how to help. She wanted no website so I promised her to try something to tell people what the band want to do. Altough she is really wild she had no idea how to tell people about it. After listening to some songs of this band I knew what she meant. Now I tried to post it here. Please don't refuse it. Even tough you're fan of this band you should let this be part of the article. If you think there is something wrong with my grammar just correct it. I am no native English speaker. Maybe you should rewrite it in a little more neutral way. Maybe it is to offensive. But if you change something it should keep its function. Please respect it. I don't want to let someone 
harm somebodys rights. And I don't want to write something what is not the truth but I think she told the truth and I know what I heard. If you have doubts and want to demur please post it here. She thought there it's same with the singer Akon. But since the article is protected I cannot write something - maybe I should create an account. But maybe there is someone is willing to help. I would be prout of anyones help. Thank you at all Wikipedia community.
--217.234.107.248 (talk) (spyro02) 19:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  critics 

message: WTF is with that? Looks kinda like an ad for some nameless band of has-beens. Somebody needs to move this or delete it altogether. EthanEndlessNameless (talk) 08:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Robot 

message: There appears to be information missing that leads to confusion in the 'Recent events' section:
It starts by talking about "another lawsuit" being filed against the band, yet doesn't mention a first lawsuit anywhere.
Also it goes on to talk about the bands 4th album release but the article has completely skipped any mention of a third album.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.146.138 (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and the reformation of the band with three new members in 2005 is barely described at all. I am going to do some work on this article soon, based on this issue and a few other things that were mentioned in earlier threads above. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned up the article (though I didn't realize I was not singed in at the time) and removed most of the promo material for Brightman's band Black Robot. Since he and the others are no longer in Buckcherry, their later activities only deserve a basic mention here. Black Robot needs to progress to the point where they deserve their own Wikipedia article. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info/continuity 

message: *Yesterday I redirected All Night Long to this article but an IP reversed it. The reason I redirected it is because not only was it unsourced, but I couldn't find any sources on Google for a release date or a track listing (the track listing even said "not officially confirmed tracks"). It says something different now, but the tracks still aren't confirmed. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: There's way better pictures of him and the band on their official site. I found a better close up of him, here, and there's individual of the other band members too. Skakdi (Talk) 05:28, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of Josh Todd and Buckcherry 

message: According to the source in the article, Buckcherry's genres are Hard rock, Post-grunge, Alternative metal, American traditional rock, and Heavy metal. These should not be changed without another source. I did not put the source in the article, but I initially changed the genres after someone put Punk rock as one of their genres, which is not in the source. I just undid an edit where someone removed every genre except hard rock. Thank you. GamerKiller2347 (talk) 09:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres