lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Foolish Pleasure

message: The main paragraph is devoted to the match race with Ruffian. While this was his most famous face, it turned out to be all about Ruffian. This article is mainly the same. More information is indicated regarding his other achievements. T.E. Goodwin (talk) 18:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Emphasis?
Talk:BYU TV

message: At least in California. -- AstroU (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also on ATT Uverse 

message: If I recall, channel 48 over air has (some?) BYU-TV, Mormon-themed and LDS church programming. Not sure if its KHAK or KHIK, but I remember seeing this stuff related to the channel, available on cable channel 465 in Time-Warner Palm Springs area. There is a sizable Mormon/Latter-day Saint population in the Inland Empire region (including the High Desert) centered in San Bernardino and Redlands where they have a LDS church temple. 2605:E000:FDCA:4200:A97F:3DC4:37A3:68EB (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also on air in Southern California 

message: BYU, according to this article, has a new logo: https://www.sltrib.com/news/2019/02/13/byutv-unveils-new-logo/
They also have a new slogan.
"And it's putting on a new face with a new logo, a new slogan — “Together” — and a new attitude. Executives at the Brigham Young University owned-and-operated channel took their campaign to raise BYUtv's profile to members of the Television Critics Association on Wednesday, unveiling their new media push."
EDIT: It will take effect on the 18th of March.
SegaRocks1145 (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo and branding
Talk:Young Ambassadors

message: The reference for the tour locations states "United Kingdom, Ireland".  I changed the original text that stated "British Isles, Ireland" to agree with the primary reference of the Young Ambassadors website (UK and I).  Using the term British Isles is incorrect and WP:SYNTH.  --Bardcom (talk) 10:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then do the same with Caribbean, Scandinavia, and all the others on the list - if you think it's so important. TharkunColl (talk) 11:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not interested in ensuring the accuracy of each fact in every article I edit - but in this case I'll make the changes cos they're pretty straight forward.  Of course, you could just as easily too, if you're so interested in accuracy. --Bardcom (talk) 12:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You miss the point. I think they're perfectly okay - it's you who claim to believe such generalisations are unacceptable. TharkunColl (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tour locations 

message: Since the citation for tour history no longer exists, I added a new one directly from Young Ambassadors and BYU. After looking at it, I realized some of the tour history is inaccurate, missing, or in the wrong order. Because of that, I am going to revamp the section to include the same information and look more similar to the BYU published tour history. I will also be deleting the repetitive wikilinks. For example, there is no reason to have "Japan" wikilinked 6 times in the article. Skyes(BYU) (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Tour history

message: Is it necessary and or meaningful to include that the band is tied to mormonism it seems fairly important to link the tie The Editizer (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mormon Group?
Talk:Chris Hutchinson (poet)

message: Chris Hutchinson is a recognized, published Canadian poet. As such he deserves his own page for his contributions to Canadian Poetry.Jamnicholl 20:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then please provide a reliable source. Note: blogs are not considered reliable sources. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 20:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for adding a source. I'm still going to let an admin review it and determine for themselves. Also, don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 20:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I understand. It's great that you really trying to contribute to Wikipedia (unlike other users). I'll tell you what, I'll remove my CSD notice. It's clear that you will be able to expand this article in the future. So just keep doing what your doing and it should be fine. Happy editing!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pilotboi (talk • contribs) 21:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Buddhist Association of China

message: I'm doing NPOV tag cleanup. Whenever an NPOV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tage was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. Jjdon (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 
Talk:European Buddhist Union

message: I have removed a  section "Buddhism in ancient Europe" and a lengthy quote about the history of Buddhism in Europe (which did not mention the role of the EBU) from the article, because these texts are not directly related to the topic of this article. Please consider to reuse the texts in Buddhism in Europe where might eventually fit (if sourced, WP:VERIFY).   JimRenge (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Buddhism in Europe
Talk:Brigham Young University Museum of Art

message: This article is anemic and only regurgitates one fact from an external source. The same info is found on the BYU page already. This page is not needed. --Eustress (talk) 20:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this has now been addressed. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 17:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete

message: It seems weird to me to have an entire section on The Ryde stop outside the MOA. There are bus stops outside of many popular museums. I think the section should be deleted, unless the MOA itself commented on the placement of the stop. Thoughts? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  section on The Ryde stop?
Talk:Kwan Um School of Zen

message: I have next to no experience in determining good articles, and absolutely no background with regard to Zen (nor any other type of Buddhism, for that matter). Nonetheless, the one thing I notice that doesn't seem to fit with the GAs I've seen is the gallery. It doesn't seem that appropriate or necessary, and as it appears to show those currently at the school, it would need continual monitoring and updating. I'd be interested in other editors' thoughts on this aspect. Lawikitejana (talk) 01:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of the good-article nomination 

message: Dear editors,
In the section "history", It says The other three centers in Israel practicing in the KUSZ are the Hasharon Zen Center,[11] the Ramat Gan Zen Group and the Pardes Hanna Zen Centre.[12]"
I myself practice in a center in Israel which is in Haifa, one of the three main cities of Israel. 
Dr. David Goren
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-david-goren-public/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.64.202.225 (talk) 03:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kwan Um center in Haifa Israel
MediaWiki talk:Permissionserrorstext

message: "You do not have permission to do that" sounds a bit... odd. And anyway, as far as I can see, it only applies to editing pages, which makes it somewhat redundant to the protected page notice (MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext), so I'm not sure what the point of it even is. Can it at least be reworded? -- 81.129.47.57 20:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take it up on WP:VP. Cheers. --MZMcBride 20:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

message: 
At the moment, this page is blank, and thus showing the default message, which is:
:
You do not have permission to do that, for the following :
It would be nice to be able to refer to this message in CSS stylesheets; this can be accomplished using an id attribute. Replace the message with:
:
You do not have permission to do that, for the following :
Thanks – Gurch 19:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 01:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  id attribute 

message: Is the message no longer required? Just wondering. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:All-Hallows-the-Great

message: From the article:
:The earliest surviving reference is in a charter of Bishop Gilbert of London in 1100-07, as Omnium Sanctorum in London quae dicitur Semannesire (All Saints that is called Seamen’s church, in London).
There was no Bishop Gilbert of London at this date (1100-1107). The first bishop of London to bear that name came to office in 1128. Is the name or the date wrong? Ephemera 20:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Charter of Bishop Gilbert
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Wikihermit 2

message: Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it, 
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
*See Wikihermit's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 20:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bot request
Talk:Bhūmi (Buddhism)

message: The section headings should be reviewed. Wikipedia policy is that only the first word and proper nouns should be capitalized. It's not clear to me that "bhumi" is a proper noun, as it is used in some places in the article starting with a lower case 'b'. Also, the MoS discourages headings from starting with an unnecessary "The". Could someone more familiar with the topic please review and correct? Yworo (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headings 

message: I feel that the changes made by User:Patrickwooldridge at 23:09, 9 April 2021 Diff is here 
"Various Vajrayana schools further analyze the 10th bhumi into 4 (sub)bhūmis (9+4=13 total)"
violated the intention of my edits and previous contributors and is incorrect as he did not look at the footnotes. I have reverted this change and added more content and citations to eliminate confusion. if anyone disagrees with the reversion please feel free to undo my changes.
Should this section be changed from "Additional Bhumis" to "Vajrayana Bhumis"? Since it is not strictly Mahayana should it be moved to a different page?
Should the original citation which is in chinese be removed? Not sure how helpful it is on an English page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogi7337 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Bhumis
Talk:MuseumsQuartier

message: The very first picture in the article is actually of the Kunsthistorisches Museum across the street from the MQ, therefor its title is incorrect too.
Maybe the creator had a reason to put it there, so I didn't want to simply take it out, just thought I'd mention it.
Maef (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect image 

message: That section is way to big and bloated. There was a debate, but it is blown out of proportion here. Can someone tame it down? K-pachs (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 
Talk:Lorelei (musical)

message: I'd call this a "start" class, since it has a brief synopsis and info on critical reception, as well as a little background on the production.  I'll add an infobox.  -- Ssilvers 20:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sentence "The original Broadway production, directed by Robert Moore and starring Carol Channing, ran for 320 performances" was very confusing, coming as it did immediately after the first paragraph, which refers to the 1949 production of Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. It sounded like it referred to THAT production, so I deleted it. The information appears under production history. ConoscoTutto 16:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm sure WP:LEAD doesn't suggest confusing the reader. The sentence you added STILL sounds like it refers to Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, not Lorelei. ConoscoTutto 22:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked at WP:LEAD. It says "it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception." I would say in this instance common sense dictates we make the occasional exception so readers aren't confused. Thank you. ConoscoTutto 22:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, I just looked at WP:LEAD again, and I really don't see where I'm supposedly wrong. I don't see anything that specifies exactly what must be in the lead. Am I missing something? Thank you. ConoscoTutto 22:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: NOW it containes the word Lorelei, but it DIDN'T at the revisions you made at  and , so please don't try to make me look wrong. I politely told you I don't see anything that specifies exactly what must be in the lead and asked you if I was missing something, and you responded very rudely. Why should I care about another editor? I'm asking you questions and you're arguing instead of answering them! ConoscoTutto 23:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Chloride, Arizona

message: Prior deletion was WP:CSD#G7 (db-author). The article seems worthwhile having due to the recent mineshaft accident, but it doesn't seem historically important enough to be in the article, unless it leads to major changes in how the state secures old mines. --Dhartung | Talk 20:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I was the one who originaly created, but I had it deleted. Oysterguitarist 20:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreated 

message: There seems to be some doubt about the name of the railway from Chloride to Kingman. According to this article it was Arizona and Utah, according to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway article it was Western Arizona and according to the Kingman, Arizona article it was the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad. Perhaps each of these owned it at different times but more information would be welcome. Biscuittin (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway
Talk:HMS Glowworm (H92)

message: No mention of "Battle of the April Storm"? This is Larry Forrester's fictionalized account of Glowworm's encounter with the Admiral Hipper. The characters are made up (mostly with different names), but the sequence of events seems to match pretty well with the description here on Wikipedia.
I was going to ask the same question! The book is mentioned in Roope's Wiki page. 
It was a great story of redemption for this thirteen-year-old!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_Broadmead_Roope  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mofo80503 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of the April storm 

message: I'm deeply puzzled that there are so few sources for the account of the final action; particularly so as the article is significantly at odds with other accounts to be found elsewhere. Roope's VC citation clearly states that he deliberately rammed the Hipper and crew member Duncan Blair  states that the captain gave the order 'prepare to ram'. There are numerous other such accounts and at least one photograph exists showing the very serious extent of damage to the Hipper's starboard side which does suggest she was rammed. Given that fact, and supposing that the longstanding story has been somehow shown to be incorrect, surely at least some reference should be made to the differing accounts? Erwfaethlon (talk) 16:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns
Talk:Tandem mass spectrometry

message: * Tandem MS Experiments section - edited and updated this.  There was some single MS info here, and I tried to present the information in a slightly clearer method.  Leafschik1967 03:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2007

message: In tandem mass spectrometry in space, the separation elements are physically separated and distinct, although there is a physical connection between the elements to maintain high vacuum. ??? the elements are physically separated but they are physically connected. please clarify!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.235.96.167 (talk) 10:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2009

message: I cannot help but notice several shortcomings with this article. From even a quick read several issues stand out:
(1) "In-source fragmentation" cannot be considered a technique of tandem mass spec. as no mass analysis has occured in the source. This section can stay but should appear after all other MS-MS techniques have been described.
(2) The "newborn screening" section is only marginally relevant. What the article needs instead is a section dedicated on applications of tandem MS, where this information can appear.
(3) A discussion on the usefulness of fragment spectra for structural elucidation of small molecular ions is missing.
(4) I am quite surprised that none of the historical papers describing the various dissociation techniques are cited in the article nor appear in the bibliography.
I do find these issues to be rather serious and need to be amended.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.251.52 (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article restructuring 

message: Could someone write an introduction? I would like to inform myself, but the article begins directly with detailed explanations without mentioning in the introduction what the difference between tandem and classical mass-spec is and why the tandem approach was invented.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.11.30.167 (talk) 30 January 2016
:I added a few sentences to expand the lead. --Kkmurray (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2016
Talk:Greenock Central railway station

message: Interesting - I put the drastically altered appearance of the station down to WWII bomb damage. Rosser Gruffydd 20:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Station appearance
Template talk:Literature

message: I attempted to convert it to use , plus alphabetized the contents, and split up the "History and lists" section, but I'm not sure if it's a clear (~100%) improvement. (Original on left, Conversion on right). I've copied the code below, for further tweaking attempts, or feedback. -- Quiddity (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert to {sidebar} ? 

message: The novella a major form? Really? The novel a major form, when it's only been around for 300 years? Drama is both a major form and a genre? Prose and poetry are "techiques"? Whatever is this list based on? Certainly not on 2,500 years of literary theory. This needs a serious rethink on the basis of authoritative works on the subject. I suggest starting with the fundamental division between Lyric, Drama and Epic. --Pfold (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Forms 

message: Would it be appropriate to add Ghost story to this template? CSJJ104 (talk) 22:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost Story 

message: The Classic of Rites was one of the Five Classics of Confucianism; it described social forms, ancient rites, and court ceremonies. - I fail to see how it has anything to do with what western notions of literature are about - JarrahTree 07:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 years later and it was still there, I removed it, but then reverted myself, when I realised that I did not have a viable alternative - but looks like no one reads this talk page, it was even weirder to find the template sitting inside the comedy main page - very disjunctive....   JarrahTree 08:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd guess :File:Liji2 no bg.png was just there because it was an image of an open book on a plain white background. Someone else removed it again this week, replacing it with :File:Cropped image of Homer from Raphael's Parnassus.jpg, which doesn't help much without a caption. I've replaced it with :File:Livre ouvert.jpg, a drawing of an unidentified, open book, which isn't ideal with a red background, but isn't bad. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Gone till November

message: I was mistaken if I suggested that the infobox template data are guidelines, as they are not; though as per MOS:CONSISTENT, almost every song on the site including good and featured articles use the radio medium release dates, e.g. Hey Ya!, Halo, Toxic, We Belong Together, Since U Been Gone, All the Small Things etc., etc., etc.; you edited Breakaway within the same day and did not alter it for using the radio date. This should not be an exception. QuestFour (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have my own set of rules for what dates to include since nobody follows them. At any rate, it seems like you've changed your stance on release dates since this incident and the Great Bosstones War of November 2020. In all honestly, I'm just glad to hear you admit that, so if you want to put the radio date back in, you can. However, you must admit that infoboxes still prefer physical dates, because that's what the template says to do. This might cause trouble down the road, because the one time I asked about radio dates on the template's talk page, things didn't progress very well, and when I tried to use commercial dates, the IPs went feral. Overall, this kind of thing seems to based on the readers' opinions, so what either one of us prefers doesn't matter that much. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a mess, but the radio dates seem to be the best approach. QuestFour (talk) 12:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Across the Borderline

message: According to the text, the album was Gold in New Zealand, but according to the table at the bottom it was gold in Norway. Which is it? Was it gold in both countries? Pburka (talk) 02:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the claim completely. Please feel free to add it back with appropriate references. Pburka (talk) 01:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gold?
Talk:Five hindrances

message: is not specially about a doubt in one's "abilities" (skills?) 
I would word it otherwise. Stjohn1970 (talk) 06:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vicikicchā
Talk:Burnside Drive

message: Burnside Drive (Dartmouth) →  – Disambiguation not needed - there are no other WP articles named 'Burnside Drive' . Mayumashu (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jafeluv (talk) 07:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Indriya

message: When this article was first created (in August 2006), samādhi was translated consistently as "concentration."  Then, on 10 Jan. 2016, an anonymous IP (109.147.0.18) made its only two edits to Wikipedia where it changed "concentration" to "stillness of mind" in two locations in this article but left "concentration" in 12 other locations.  I think some might find this confusing; others, a disservice.  While I can appreciate that there are many vibrant contemporary Buddhist communities (extending from Christina Feldman and her colleagues at the awesome Bodhi College to Ajahn Brahm -- although it looks like Bhikkhu Sujato on suttacentral.org is using "immersion" in some contexts?) that translate samādhi as "stillness" (or some variation on this); traditionally, for over a century, it has been translated as "concentration" (e.g., check out the PTS Pali-English Dictionary [PED], originally published in 1921).  So, not knowing how to dialogue with IP address 109.147.0.18, and wanting to be fair, I'm going to change "stillness of mind" in this article to "concentration/stillness" and then add a couple of references for each (e.g., for "concentration," depending on time, I'll cite the PED, Richard Shankman in "The Experience of Samadhi," maybe Ven. Thanissaro, Bhikkhu Bodhi, etc.; and, for "stillness," I have queued up a convenient Feldman article in Tricycle, Ajahn Brahm being interviewed in Shankman's book, maybe Stephen Batchelor, Martine Batchelor, etc.).  If someone disagrees, please let me know, of course.  Thanks so much! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 18:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of samādhi