lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Miracle of Love

message: *The Miracle of Love was started in 1987 by David Swanson, his wife Carole Seidman (who took the name Kalindi) and The Lady, and several other "seekers". After David Swanson's death, Carol Siedman headed the group until her death. [2] This is when the benevolent Being Gourasana entered David Swanson's body as "an Incarnation of God manifesting on Earth".[1]
The chronology appears to have gotten confused. Did Gourasana enter David Swanson's body after his death and the death of Carol, or in 1987?    Will Beback  talk   23:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's just a bad edit.  Gourasana gradually entered into David Swanson's body 1987 and died on March 24, 1995 (reference: Breaking the Cycle of Birth & Death).  Carole Seidman was his first disciple and Gourasana gave her the name Kalindi early on.  As far as the Miracle of Love organization goes, Kalindi was really running it from the beginning (before 1995) and leading their seminars.  Gourasana was the spiritual force behind it, brought in spiritual teachings and taught his disciples, but was not so involved in leading the organization.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dl333 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology
Talk:Sampot

message: I've started the article, please expand and add better pics. CanCanDuo 01:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would look better if the beginning of the article didn't focus on Lao or Thai. Since this is an article about sampots, then the opening paragraph should tell us more about sampots such as it's uses, it's appearance and what it is made of but only use brief sentence It should be mentioned that Thai and Lao have similar dress-style, but it is going into detail too early in the article about the influence. Leave that for a later section in the article. Basically, the opening article should state the importants points first and discuss them in sections below. I'm not going to edit it though. --Dara 17:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The reference I used refered to the similarities between Thai, Khmer and Lao textiles.  I just added refernce to Lan Xang and Sukhothai as being Angkor influenced like how the kimono article refered to kimonos being influence by China's tang dynasty. You can remove it or add to another section like history but I don't mind it.  CanCanDuo 00:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Started

message: it seems so--Riccardo.fabris (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Has someone "used" this article?

message: There are:
* Sampot Charabap
* Sampot Hol
* Sampot Pha Muong
* Sampot L'beuk
plus others I don't know. But this article only explains two types of Sampot (textiles worn around the lower body). --Dara (talk) 03:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Textiles
Talk:Waterproof fabric

message: Is the word "waterproof" regulated for the benefit of US consumers, the way "Organic" is now? In other words, do manufacturers have to prove their garments meet any particular standard to be label them as "waterproof"?
The other day I saw some plain gloves that were labeled in three places that they were "weatherproof". I wonder what that meant! 
--12.176.101.89 01:17, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

message: In the article, there's now a specific definition of waterproof (1000 mm water) given with no source.  Surely different definitions exist, so providing this one without a mention of the organization that established this definition is not very helpful.Ccrrccrr (talk) 01:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific definition 

message: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). --Error (talk) 02:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademarks

message: There is currently an long list of manufacturers selling waterproof fabrics.  These claims of being "waterproof" are not supported.  Wikipedia policy WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK indicates that such lists of  are promotional and not appropriate.  Wikipedia is not a shopping list.  This section needs to go.  Rlsheehan (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the promotional list.  Rlsheehan (talk) 02:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional list
Talk:Tony Mills (physician)

message: I cleaned up the article quite a bit and deleted many dead-link refs. Found some new ones; more may be needed. Patricia Meadows (talk) 05:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General overhaul November 2009

message: I’m unclear as to why this individual, one HIV clinician among thousands, merits an entry in a premier encyclopedia with international scope? Because he came out? Because he was in a LGBTQIA+ version of a beauty pageant? Because he’s important to himself? Or is this a medical practice advertisement? Somebody other than the author/subject (same difference?) enlighten me please… Alanrobts (talk) 04:13, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki worthy?
Talk:Kumkuma

message: The article answers a lot about a kumkum but not what it is
As a matter of fact Kumkum is applied to the feet & is liquid red. It masks the chapped heels
115.241.250.93 (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What is a kumkum?

message: The previous version stated the mix included lime, the fruit, instead of slaked lime, the chemical compound. I have fixed the link.--Snowgrouse 01:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Components

message: Sindoor and Kumkum appear to be different things. Sindoor is very specific and has specific uses. Kumkum appears to be more general and can have several compositions and colors. It also has multiple functions unrelated to Sindoor. Maybe Sindoor can be classified as a type of Kumkum (uncertain of this - is it true?), but its cultural and religious significance warrant a distinct article. --Hunnjazal (talk) 09:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not merge

message: Kumkuma or Kumkumum is the original word.    
kumkum is the hindi(and other north Indian lang.) variant of the Sanskrutam word Kumkumam/kumkuma.  
can someone please change the title of this page?  
209.147.224.225 (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kumkum is wrong word
Talk:Big Bang (Singh book)

message: "...fascinating journey through the evolution of different theories of the universe"
Sounds like NNPOV, specifically - promotional language.
Hence the edit.
Heavynash 03:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Big Two-Hearted River

message: Just from the first parts of the article:
*In the first paragraph of the lead, most readers will have to use the link to find out what the "theory of omission" is (I did). Thus they have to leave the article within seconds of starting it; some may not come back, given that the link article is far from WP's finest. I recommend that you add a brief explanation of the term to the lead.
*In the "Background and publication history" section the "Background" part seems a little thin. For example, shouldn't it be mentioned that Hemingway served in WWI, given that the war is relevant to the story? Did his experiences help him in writing it? 
Brianboulton (talk) 22:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks, I've removed the easter egg for the Iceberg Theory and want to think a little about how to distill that concept into a couple of sentences. The biographical details are later in the article in the themes section, but probably need some splitting out. I remember having enormous trouble with the structure here, so the feedback is welcome. Truthkeeper (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

text: *Many months later - I've tried working on both of these points. Thanks. Truthkeeper (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: A couple of points

message: Can the opening section say the story has no plot when the article has a separate section on its plot?Catherinejarvis (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot / no plot? 

message: Not a single link to the Two Hearted River or only a buried reference to the Fox River (Michigan) which is the more likely inspiration. Rmhermen (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: River
Talk:Binas (book)

message: In May a notability template was added to this page. I am suggesting to remove the template, because this book is used in almost every secondary school in the Netherlands. As such it certainly meets criterium 4 of the notability guideline for books: "The book is, or has been, the subject of instruction at two or more schools, colleges, universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country." The template was added because of a lack of sources, I have provided those sources.  opinion? -ItzLarz (talk) 23:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:2007 Los Angeles Dodgers season

message: Sort players by Batting Average.  Only list players who qualify for batting title until after season ends.  On ESPN.com, for the player stats, players whose names are BOLDED indicate that they are eligible for the batting title. 
So no one can list any players that don't qualify for the batting title until after the season ends? What kind of comment is this? I would think it would be more interesting to see the Dodgers full baseball stats from time to time throughout the year. Then you could save that date, like June 2, 2007 and look back on August 2nd, 2007 and see how much people have improved. Hornberry 14:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ....

message: I will add a season summary when I get back from my trip. This article is basically stats right now. Hornberry 14:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Season summary

message: 1. Detalied Standings and Stats
2. Season Summary (Most of the stuff right now is stats and standings so a season summary would be good)
3. Trivia (Like how many times Grady Little, the Manager used the same lineup)
4. Improvement of Players (could be in Trivia)
5. Injured Players and Their Status' 
Hornberry 14:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note on Trivia. There is a current situation on wikipedia to remove trivia sections by adding the trivia content into the article. As this article is still be constructed, instead of making a trivia section, put the trivia straight into your prose.--Borgardetalk 03:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goals for this page

message: I try to do the stats for night games the day after, because I usually am attending to homework and essays and when I'm done at 10:30 or 11, I never feel like updating the stats. Just an explanation why they might be out of date for 12 hours or so. Hornberry 05:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats

message: 1. Detalied Standings and Stats √
2. Season Summary √
3. Interesting Facts and Improvement of Players. (Like how many times Grady Little, the Manager used the same lineup)
5. Injured Players and Their Status' 
Hornberry 14:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goals for this page
Talk:Bitter Harvest (2001 book)

message: This is described as a follow-up to The Great Betrayal, but I think it is the same book, with a forward by Rupert Cornwell. I'll try to confirm this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cagliost (talk • contribs) 19:39, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate?
Talk:Black Elk Speaks

message: As there is no discussion here regarding the heading citation tag here, as there is no note of who the author of it was, and as I have added a number of references (more welcome!) and expansions, I have removed the tag as it now seems unwarranted. LookingGlass (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No comment 

message: Black Elk Speaks is referenced extensively in William Least Heat-Moon's Blue Highways. Perhaps it would be good to add a section on references in popular culture? Wideaperture (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.Parkwells (talk) 21:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in popular culture 

message: Thanks CorbieVeccran for the clarification; the other was from an interview by Hilda Niehardt.Parkwells (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Adoption

message: The linked individual is not noted as an artist/illustrator, so I'm not sure which person is the illustrator. Delinking until clarified. - CorbieV☊ 22:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standing Bear - which one?  
Talk:Spanish Lookout

message: We need to watch this page closely lately there has been a bit of vandilism on it.
Also, oil was discoverd here and is being actively pumped.  I will take some pics of 
the oil wells and transhipment point tommrow and get some accurate dates of deiscover and 
such and update the page to inculde that data
Belizian 18:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Black Rednecks and White Liberals

message: This quote:
an aversion to work, proneness to violence, neglect of education, sexual promiscuity, improvidence, drunkenness, lack of entrepreneurship,… and a style of religious oratory marked by strident rhetoric, unbridled emotions, and flamboyant imagery.
does not exist in the referenced piece; only the second half of it (the part after the ellipses).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.169.157 (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote not in referenced piece 

message: The summary seems oversimplified to the point of being misleading.  2600:8801:0:1530:B992:5CA0:8CE7:94D3 (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  oversimplified
Talk:Black Skin, White Masks

message: Apparently this was, at some point in the 1990s (?), adapted for TV in the UK. A 50 minute long version, the index card currently sat in front of me says. Sadly, the tape doesn't appear to exist any more (at least, I haven't found it yet), and there's no other useful information on record other than the author name, "BBC2", and a strange index string of "Tx: Frantz Fanon: 1061". Possibly there was a programme called Tx (or "Transmission"?) covering various authors' works? Can anyone shed any light on this? IMDB hasn't turned anything up thus far... 193.63.174.211 (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screen adaptions? 

message: This article has clearly been written by one of the subversives behind this obscure theory, and makes many assumptions with explaining what this theory, or book, is.
This is not neutral, as Wikipedia so oft trumpets itself to be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.30.23 (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Postcolonialism is a rich and established academic tradition. Black Skin, White Faces is a foundational text in this tradition, few would consider it "obscure". Use of the term "subversives" indicates the editor has a very clear opinion they wish to be expressed in this page that may not be appropriate. I agree that some sections of the page could use better citation, but do not believe Fanon's basic arguments to be misrepresented. Requesting 500/30 protection of this page due to its relation to Critical Race Theory and Postcolonialism. 24.188.161.176 (talk) 04:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perspective Bias? 

message: This article is not an encyclopedia entry with proper references. It's a personal take on the subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.13.176.163 (talk) 04:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious Editing Required

message: Could easily be incorporated (as a precis) into the article about the book where this concept was introduced, with a redir from the term. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree! The article only describes the concept as defined by Fanon, so the article about the book is the right place for it. I don't think this merge would be at all controversial, but might as well ping the creator of Phobogenesis () to see if they object. Lennart97 (talk) 13:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

text: It seems that no one is objecting. Are you able and willing to perform the merge? Lennart97 (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Support Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Phobogenesis]] into [[Black Skin, White Masks]]
Talk:St. John's College, Belize

message: I propose to merge the content from St. John's College High School, Belize into this article. There is no reason for a seperate article on the secondary/high school and it can easily be explained within the context of this article on the College, that comprises three divisions, one of which is the school; the other two relating to tertiary education. Please let me know here if you have any feedback. Cheers. Rangasyd (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 08:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from St. John's College High School, Belize
Talk:Among Gnomes and Trolls

message: So I’ve made a bunch of alterations. Below are a list of some. The article now has plenty of room for more pictures in connection to the tales listed. It can now be used as a complement to John Bauer (illustrator). I will move on to that article in 24 hours and fix the pictures + add more facts.
* This article should really be moved to “Among gnomes and trolls”.  - W.carter (talk) 19:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everything in its proper place. 

message: Should the title "Bland tomtar och troll" really be translated? If there hasn't been any official translations, it looks like a neologism, and I think the original title should probably be the default title. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: We might provide a translation, but avoid treating it as a title unless there is an official one.★Trekker (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Blandings Castle and Elsewhere

message: I have in front of me a copy of Blandings Castle published by Herbert Jenkins whose colophon states "First Published by/ Herbert Jenkins Limited,/ 3 Duke of York Street,/ London, S.W.1/1922" (and underneath that "First published in the Autograph Edition/1957"). (The article currently states that the first publication date was 12 April 1935.)
I will attempt to upload a scan of this to Wikimedia Commons.
I'm not an expert on Wodehouse publication dates but I do notice that many sources state that BC&E was first published in 1935.
--TyrS 01:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at the copyright regulations, I don't think I can upload scans of this book, as Wodehouse died in 1970.--TyrS 02:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  first published 1935? 

message: I propose merging Mr Potter Takes a Rest Cure, Monkey Business, The Rise of Minna Nordstrom, and The Castaways to this article. The five Hollywood Mulliner stories in this collection seem to be notable more as a group than individually, and "Mr Potter Takes a Rest Cure" is not a main series story or particularly notable.  Miles26 (talk) 07:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Blind Alley

message: In the Second Foundation Trilogy by the Killer "B"s, it is revealed that one human colony was established in the Magellanic Clouds. 70.55.84.42 (talk) 07:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical context

message: I noticed the article says "It is not known whether Asimov intended to make a link between those novels and this short story." What sources place "Blind Alley" in Asimov's Galactic Empire series? If there are none, should it be removed from the relevant articles? --xensyriaT 17:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Empire series? 

message: Second paragraph: "it is set in the Foundation universe"; 
Third paragraph: "that was not part of Asimov's Foundation". 
Please, decide or rewrite. 179.66.195.48 (talk) 21:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was or wasn't?
Talk:Blue Highways

message: I'm just reading Blue Highways and working on a Google Maps rendering of the journey - not sure how to add this to the entry
Dikko 10:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading1

message: I am not going to edit, as I am not sure how.  However the current page states it is a white van. That is incorrect. While the author is in GA, he clearly writes that it is a GREEN van. Will someone please verify (if needed) and edit? thanks, rachelmarch Rachelmarch (talk) 23:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Heading2

message: The web page Interactive Map of Moon's Journey on Littourati doesn't seem to show anything. I have tried 2 browsers, Chrome and Microsoft Edge and neither of them show a map.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Esbboston (talk • contribs) 09:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I also had the same problem 2601:543:C100:1100:5886:EE52:F840:8562 (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Doesn't Seem To Work
Talk:From Them, Through Us, to You

message: I'm not sure of the official track listing, and whether some editions of the album are different.
I have the US version which has 13 tracks, including "The Auspiece" as track 1. Anyone with the UK version that can tell me if they have the identical track listing? I assume the advanced copy sent out to the press (such as the All Music Guide) has 12 tracks, and 3 tracks which are shorter in length. Thanks Dmiles21 00:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing
Talk:Blue Like Jazz

message: According to bluelikejazzthemovie.com/ and SaveBlueLikeJazz.com the money has been raised.  Somebody better at NPOV should probably add that.  I'm too busy jumping up and down to be neutral about it. Wickedjacob (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the money's been raised! 
Talk:Blueberries for Sal

message: Blueberries for Sal (1976)?? 1948 according to http://worldcatlibraries.org/oclc/13732621?tab=details ; Caldecott Honour Book 1949 according to http://www.ala.org/ala/alsc/awardsscholarships/literaryawds/caldecottmedal/caldecotthonors/caldecottmedal.htm#40s 1976 appears to be the date of the Viking edition and copyright renewal 216.191.217.92 16:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication Date
Talk:Bodies Under Siege

message: This book certainly deserves an article because it's very well known in the self-injury community. I would question the write-up though (it looks good now, but keep an eye on it...) because non-SI people are unlikely to have heard of it, so this is one of those "edge" articles that will probably be gradually pushed in a certain ideological direction. 2A00:23C5:FE18:2700:6117:4E70:B628:B5E6 (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral approach
Talk:Getmail

message: I have removed a paragraph that makes an assertion about the security of Getmail compared with Fetchmail. The only citation was a comparison in the number of CVE reports. Counting public vulnerabilities is a misleading metric on which to make assertions about software quality or security. Two flaws in that comparison I can see is that it does not take into account vulnerabilities in Python, and that Getmail probably has a much smaller deployment base than Fetchmail. If you have any comments on the topic, please leave a note on my talk page. —midg3t 01:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't delete sources or facts.  If you find something that isn't representing the truth correctly, be bold and adjust it. John Vandenberg 02:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Security 

message: "Unlike fetchmail, getmail's Python foundation makes it all but immune to buffer overflow security holes." - Can this be turned into clearer language? Guaka (talk) 09:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear language