lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Baby's Day Out

message: The plot summary had got out of hand and was marked as overlong.  I've replaced it with a much briefer, yet adequate, version from and older revision . --Tony Sidaway 01:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: The plot is too specific and long. A paragraph is enough.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.148.70 (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The plot is too short now. At least a little bit more. And not so much "flair" language it sounds like the little description on the back of a DVDGobberpooper (talk) 23:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot too long

message: It's mentioned several times that the baby has "invisibility" and only the kidnappers can "physically see him."  To me, that suggests the baby has super powers.  Is that part of the movie??  It's rather confusing, and if it is actually meant as a suspension of disbelief rather than actual INTENT of invisibility...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.20.11.116 (talk) 12:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Superpowers??

message: I noticed that there's a  in the plot section. Is it seriously not shown in the movie? I haven't watched it properly yet, but I might do in the meantime. GOLDIEM J (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed in the plot?!
Talk:Beethoven (film)

message: That isn't a puppy! Its an old man. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.41.14.138 (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's still a pic of Beethoven the man, not a promotional poster for the movie, this might need to get sorted as I was just directed here Wikiproject films as an example of what a "Start" class article should be. Ryan4314 16:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong pic 

message: "Only 20 people in the world saw this movie."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.125.229 (talk) 04:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The original dog playing Beethoven was only in the first two movies. He is no longer alive but some of the dogs in the later films likely are. His real name was Chris, owned and trained by Karl Lewis Miller who also trained animals for Cujo, K-9, Babe, and many others.
Why here is no section for the dog? In the Article of Mr. Ed, Flipper, Lassie, Tarzan there are sections ans names for the animals, but not for this very successfull movie? its not fair.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.66.12.54 (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.wooftunes.com/woof-stars/famous-tv-dogs/beethoven-aka-chris/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.235.36.62 (talk) 07:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog
Talk:Only a Downstat

message: I encountered the following line in the article:
:The song's title is a Scientology reference, a 'downstat' being a person whose productivity has decreased, or a decrease in productivity itself (though the term is generally used by Scientology's critics and does not appear in the official Scientology website).
Googling on "site:scientology.org downstat" shows that the word does indeed appear on the official Scientology website itself.  I have therefore removed the incorrect text. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Antaeus.  The word didn't show up when I updated this article and used the search engine on the scientology site itself (it still doesn't) but when I google as you did it does - just shows...  Cheers, Ian Rose 10:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While the word "downstat" might be Scientology-related, I can almost positively say that the song has nothing to do with Scientology. The world depicted in the album Replicas, to which this song belongs, is a dystopian future scenario of no religion or supernaturalism. Any Scientology connections are, I'm pretty convinced, completely coincidental. Adding it as fact to an article borders on stupidity. TorbenFrost 13:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I tagged the article as non-notable. I also removed the Project Scientology box from this page. Steve Dufour 17:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Loaded Weapon 1

message: the line "There was every intention to make a sequel; Loaded Weapon 2. A deal had been set in place before the film had gone into production and a poster had even been printed with the caption, "Oh come ON, you knew it was coming!" When Loaded Weapon 1 underperformed at the box office, however, the deal was severed." has been copied word for word in the trivia section of imdb 86.3.137.58 (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  poss copyright issue
Talk:National Lampoon Presents Dorm Daze

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --MLauba (talk) 08:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jackie-O Motherfucker

message: The title of this article should be "Jackie-O Motherfucker" (with the O capitalized) but for some reason I'm not able to move it. Bigpacifisteyes 04:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved it for you. Mushroom 04:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Some Kind of Wonderful (film)

message: please rewrite the trivia about the stones :) it sounds too speculative to survive a meany editor who is stuck on facts Chivista 15:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Stones 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: An unregistered user, editing through a dynamic IP, has repeatedly changed "Keith tells Jenns he is 'over' her and Amanda slaps..." to remove the word "her". I do not know whether the IP is a vandal, is unfamiliar with the idiom of being "over" someone or what. In context, to the average English-speaking reader, Keith being "over her" makes sense. Even if you do not understand the idiom, I am unaware of any usage of the word "over" wherein Keith could be "over" with no subject given or implied. So long as the changes continue without explanation, I will be reverting them, directing the editor to this talk page to discuss the issue. - SummerPhDv2.0 23:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "over her"
Talk:Wolf Eyes

message: I dumped some tracks from the Sega Saturn game Fighter's History Dynamite, and WinAmp labels the music as being performed by Wolf Eyes and Black Dice.  Is this accurate? --M.Neko 16:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fighter's History Dynamite

message: Wolf Eyes invented mother against noise. -Nate Young
I erased the M.A.N. from this page and created a M.A.N. entry. Im not shure if Wolf Eyes should have a mention of MAN or not.
Could someone make a M.A.N. wiki page? Its not clear that Wolf Eyes are responsible. Too many people are suspect, especially since Thurston Moore announced that Ecstatic Peace has a made a deal with Universal Records. 
According to my personal contact with C-drik Fermont (of the band Axiome...among others, who runs mothersagainstnoise.org), his site is devoted to actually releasing noise comps, and has no affiliation with mothersagainstnoise.us, except for parody value.  The-dissonance-reports 04:36, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mothers Against Noise

message: "Rumored to have released"? Sounds a bit sloppy for an encyclopedia article.--Eloil 15:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The group is rumored to have released over 150 recordings
Talk:Sesame Street Presents: Follow That Bird

message: Seems to me that too much space is devoted to "Morals of the story," considering the over-all length of the article. --Jeremy Butler 11:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much on "Morals of the story" 

message: I added a plot on this article about the Jim Henson-stylized Warner Bros. logo that comes after the Grouch Anthem. --ItsCharlieBrown (talk) 18:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As much as we appreciate the contribution, I have reverted it, because technically, it has no bearing whatsoever on the movie's actual plot.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Henson-stylized Warner Bros. logo 

message: In this edit I removed the Background Muppets section. Per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE, we are not an indiscriminate collection of information. Nowhere else do we log background performers, as in both film and television articles, we focus on significant cast. Extras, be they human or Muppet, are not noteworthy, which is why they don't typically receive film or TV credit unless they speak. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background Muppets 

message: Worldcat has records for eleven editions of the movie. Records for the more recent versions are more detailed than the older ones; compare, for example, the 1986 VHS version, which doesn't list the cast, to the 2009 '25th anniversary deluxe ed'. The two oldest records include neither Children's Television Workshop (CTW) nor Sesame Workshop; the next five, CTW but not Sesame Workshop; the most recent three list both Sesame Workshop and CTW. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sesame Workshop didn't exist when the film was made; it's a new name for the old company, and while it would make sense that they would brand newer versions with that name, it is not accurate to the making of the film. The same IPs that have been trying to battle in that change have also been putting other anachronistic company names in other Sesame Street/PBS-related articles. --Nat Gertler (talk) 12:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's Television Workshop & Sesame Workshop 

message: 2600:6C42:6400:5EF7:4112:B427:F9DD:3A53 (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unclear what changes you want to be made, you can resubmit your edit request in a "change X to Y" format. 54nd60x (talk) 03:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2021
Talk:Speed Zone

message: This article states that Speed Zone is also known as Cannonball Run 3.  By whom is it "known" as Cannonball Run 3?  The production team is all different.  Was it the same studio?
I'd like to add this to the main Cannonball Run article as a sequel, but would prefer not to until I can find a verifiable source that this movie is related to the first two.
--Alex.rosenheim (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannonball Run - Part 3? 

message: The title of this article is mistakenly called "Speed Zone!" The actual title of the film is simply "Speed Zone"  with no punctuation. Any official listing of the film title (including in the film itself) excludes any usage of an exclamation point. Any reference of "Speed Zone!" in this article of in the title of this article itself should be corrected. Harry Yelreh (talk) 21:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No exclamation point in title 

message: There is a RR Corniche.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.152.145.186 (talk) 13:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bentley Corniche? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Speed Zone (redirect). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 27#Speed Zone (redirect) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Speed Zone (redirect)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rookie of the Year (film)

message: Should we mention the scene where Henry pounds on a metal gate, and a guard pops his head out - an obvious reference to The Wizard of Oz (1939 film)?
:That's a horse of a different color!
Our readers might want to know about this bit of silliness. --Uncle Ed (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Demanding entry

message: Deleting this article on the grounds that it is "not notable" is absurd.  This film features Gary Busey and Daniel Stern, among other successful actors, was produced by 20th Century Fox, and grossed over $53 million.  See the IMDB page for more information. 67.186.34.198 (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Deletion 

message: Cubs Owner played by the late Eddie Bracken did not urge Larry Fisher to "find that kid." It was Mr. Fisher who urged a younger guy (probably his lawyer or scout) to find Henry. I have just watched this film on cable so I know this is fact 100 percent. So this should be corrected. I would fix it myself, but I haven't quite gotten the hang of user signature. User Aidensdaddy 12:22 PM 6/20/2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction Needed
Talk:Canadian Bacon

message: Canadian Bacon comes from a cow. But in America bacon is from a pig. There is a HUGE difference in the two types. Because Candas Bacon comes from a cow it has peaunt butter in it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.162.20.225 (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wrong is Right — another satirical film on similar subject.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.190.161.115 (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also 
Talk:My Blue Heaven (1990 American film)

message: The section of this entry is completely incorrect, as the movie was considered a critical failure. The only source given for the claim is Rotten Tomatoes, which postdates the movie by 10 years. To wit, most of the positive reviews on that page are from later critics and bloggers, who, let's be honest, are looking at the movie from a nostalgia-tinted lens.
For some more contemporary opinions of My Blue Heaven, check out the Washington Post:
My Blue Heaven" puts you in a stupor comparable to the one that comes on after Thanksgiving turkey.
''
Meanwhile, the New York Times called it, rather accurately, "a truly funny concept and a disappointment on the screen." Even Entertainment Weekly said that "with the exception of a few scenes, doesn't really have the wit it's aiming for."
It's not that I hate this movie, but The Jerk it ain't.
I suggest rewriting the whole section. Objections?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.187.251.22 (talk) 04:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 
Talk:L.A. Story

message: It's nice people want to contribute but it's not nice if they're not intelligent enough to do a good job and actually make a contribution. Fixing this horridly written article will now take more work and time than if it were to be anew written from scratch (which might be a clue). If only stupid uneducated people knew how stupid and uneducated they are. Help us, Jimmy! :))
::Man, that leaves out all current Wiki contributors - not a bad thing as Wiki is pretty much worthless anyway except for a good laugh.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.141 (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Class is Generous

message: I added the fact that a soundtrack was never released for this film. With all the great music, it's surprising that it was never done. Hollywood makes some big mistakes. Jtpaladin 03:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of soundtrack 

message: I spruced up the Plot section a bit and deleted some errors.  Also added a note about the parallel between the movie's opening and that of Fellini's La Dolce Vita - hotdogs&consumerism is to LA as Jesus is to the Vatican.  Qubiter 02:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added info 

message: I took out the following-"LA Story is considered by some to be Steve Martin's finest, most intricately insightfully written, and performed film"
Who are some? Where are the sources? And that is way too many adjectives. It also sounds biased.--68.19.194.211 (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I took out this part
Talk:Grand Canyon (1991 film)

message: No article for her here?????Dcrasno (talk) 20:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tina Lifford
Talk:Dreamcatcher (2003 film)

message: I'm not in the habit of making such comments on WP, but, having just seen the film on TV, the screenplay is unmitigated crap. I know cinema rquires a "temporary suspension of belief" but to what extent? Two guys stuck in the back of the Rockies in winter in a hunter's cabin - and they don't have a gun??? C'mon! TINYMark (Talk) 03:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:NOTAFORUM ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 22:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid writer 

message: Is it possible we may be seeing a mind Dogan in the telepathy scenes? This being a reference to Stephen Kings other work the Dark Tower. 
24.239.66.142 (talk) 04:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogan 

message: "Dreamcatcher did break even against an estimated $68 million production budget." That's not how this math works. The box office is not profit. It's the income of all combined ticket sales. Theatres take about half of it, and the studio spent money to market the film on top of the production budget.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.45.22.127 (talk) 11:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box office 

message: Was mention of the short removed or was it never here?  It needs to be added that it was released with the film. IRMacGuyver (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Flight of the Osiris 
Talk:The Accidental Tourist

message: Even though there was a link to the movie, and this article was meant to be for the novel, the two were essentially joined.  Because both the novel and the book are multi-award winners and are therefore important in their own rights, I've split the two articles.  So now we have The Accidental Tourist and The Accidental Tourist (film).  I've also changed all of the corresponding links and categories.  Hopefully more info will be added to both articles.  María: (habla ~ cosas)  14:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Gorky Park (film)

message: What possible connection do other movies directed by the same man have here? That should be removed. The plot should be improved. It sounds more like an advertisement tyhen a plot summary. It should at least name the perpetrator.
This is a very dull, boring and uninteresting movie.  Very ameturish and a waste off time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.250.201.60 (talk) 02:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard response would be WP:SOFIXIT.  I don't know what your first sentence is referring to, as far as I can see the article doesn't mention any other films directed by Apted.  The plot could do with some shortening, but I don't see it reading like an advertisement, it summarizes the plot adequately.  If you know who the perpetrator is feel free to add it.  As for your personal opinions about the quality of the film, those have no relevance when writing an encyclopedia article on the topic. --Daniel 02:27, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia complaints department

message: I just edited the Filming section to remove a reference to production being delayed "several years" due to scheduling and casting matters. This made no sense to me since the article also said the rights were only purchased in 1981 and the film was released in 1983.
Checking the referenced source (the AFI catalogue) it had more information and dates, and this is the source for my adding the date for filming commencing. GraemeC (talk) 15:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Filming dates and delays
Talk:The Klansman

message: I have changed the text stating that OJ was largely unknown in 1974, he was an established football star by then. Joaq99 03:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Largely unknown in 74?

message: Seing that it's downloadable via the Internt Archive, an account of how a major Hollywood release with an A-list cast came to be in PD seems worthy of inclusion if someone knows a good way to research this. Bustter (talk) 04:50, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See discussion per Talk:List of films in the public domain in the United States#The Klansman. Answer is probably still in copyright, it is based on a copyright book (published 1967) and as such the film is a multi-layer work and still protected (see linked discussion and related discussion for It's a Wonderful Life). Some PD distributions believe the abridged TV version is in the PD because the TV version was released without a proper copyright notice, but that is a weak argument given that it's based on a copyright book.  PD distributors have a tendency to shoot first and ask questions later using whatever rationales for claiming PD status. In the end only a judge can decide, but I suspect Paramount isn't too concerned with a low quality abridged pirate version floating around. -- GreenC 16:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain? 
Talk:Shout at the Devil (film)

message: The article says that it is discovered that England and America are at war with Germany. Not so. The moment in question occurs in 1914. The Americans did not enter the war until 1917. Altgeld (talk) 17:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The errors mentioned on the main page are really just one error, the belligerent status of Portugal. The others mentioned all flow from that one error, which isn't really an error in the usual sense. It is an example of the use of artistic license to improve a fictional story.
207.30.62.198 (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error comments overdone 

message: The article says this -
Although the motives for killing Fleischer are personal, Sebastian Oldsmith is in fact the only major character who is a citizen of a nation actually at war with Germany.
Depends upon how you define a major character.  If it is only Marvin, Moore and Parkins, then yes.  
Kolldehoff and Holm?  Jokem (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  War with Germany 

message: Were those elephants the victims of an actual hunt as portrayed in the movie ? 208.98.222.110 (talk) 00:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The elephants shot in the movie
Talk:Pirates (1986 film)

message: In the Production section, it says "Polanski was arrested for statutory rape, which caused him to flee the country". However, it doesn't say what country he fled from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.199.130 (talk) 18:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polanski fleeing the country - what country? 

message: If Ms Lewis was born in 1967, and this movie was made in 1986, how can she have been 16 at the time of making the movie ??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.17.214.218 (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Charlotte Lewis thing 

message: I've always wanted to see this movie in the widescreen format it obviously was meant for... but I can't find any non-VHS releases other than a PAL Italian DVD release. Does anyone have any idea if this movie will ever be available on Blu-Ray, or at least DVD? Thanks? 69.174.58.44 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-VHS release for US?