lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:António Botto

message: The terms "Active bibliography" and "Passive bibliography" are rather odd. The former gets lots of google hits, but most of them have nothing to do with the way it is being used here, and the latter gets just 31, most of which look like (mis)translations from Spanish and Portuguese sites. Osomec 22:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to add the same point, what is the difference? Is it supposed to be ghost written, under a pseudonym, as a co-writer, or what? --86.128.252.182 23:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Active bibliography" means list of works by a certain author ; "passive bibliography" means list of works about that author and/or his works by other authors.--Orlando F 18:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These terms are not commonly used in English, so they should be removed from this article. Osomec 22:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Puzzling headings
Talk:Dorothy Abbott

message: Does anyone have access to a picture of her that we can put up?
EmGaGa (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Can someone add a category to this I dont know how. Add an American Actress and Find-A-Grave Project.
Nevermind I got it.The Clydelishes Clyde 15:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cookham railway station

message: I've removed some of the emotive descriptions in this article, for example, "the remains of the station's once lavish facilities can be seen to the west" and "the station's facilities are now rather basic".  I've also removed some of the description about the branch line itself, since this is better addressed on Marlow Branch Line.  The text could still use some more tidying up Hertzsprung 15:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:You're the Best

message: what else is this song in? i can almost picture it but not quite 2600:6C55:4A00:47E:6187:961C:40C4:FA8B (talk) 06:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  come on man 

message: This song is used in the It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia season two episode, "Hundred Dollar Baby" (also in a training montage). Would it be appropriate to add this refernce to the "Appearances" section?  I'm just a little wary as Wikipedia is no longer the pop culture references dump it used to be, but It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia is a pretty popular show and it's a relatively prominent scene in the episode. This might also be what the above poster was referring to. Markoff-Chaney (talk) 13:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia reference
Talk:Bispham

message: It has been proposed, by a user whose sole purpose on wikipedia, certainly when considering their username, and contributions so far -User:Notability Crusader appears to be suggest that articles that they do not consider notable are merged into others. For instance in this case, the proposal is to merge Bispham High School Arts College into this article. Although having said that, Notability Crusaders link to here wasn't correct. I am mentioning this on here also, and including below for information the message I have left on the talk page Talk:Bispham High School Arts College. Thanks
Strongly disagree. This school appears to have been picked at random based solely on it being mentioned on WP:Schools because it had been vandalised, presumably by school pupils. I have worked on this page for some time now to ensure any vandalism is quickly removed, and to start improving the article so that is well written and more comprehensive. And also intend to maintain the article as it is in my Watchlist so any vandalism will be quickly removed. Having said that, there has been very little vandalism of this article recently. ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 16:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal [[Bispham High School Arts College]] into here
Talk:You Can Thank Me Later

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Hut 8.5 07:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Mary Fitton

message: "This may have been an error for Mary, rather than her sister Anne."
This is completely inappropriate unless cited by a source. Is there really any reason to believe the dedicatee was Mary, and not Anne?
--BenJonson (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anne is not the Same as Mary 

message: Should we make mention that she has living descendants today? 134340Goat (talk) 23:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living descendants
Talk:Collierville Middle School

message: This article has now been assessed. The feedback given was as follows: Gives a bit of basic information about the school but little else. Needs much expansion, references, an infobox, and perhaps some pictures. Camaron1 | Chris 16:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page up to 'Start' since it now contains encyclopaedic information. As a Blue Ribbon school it well merits a 'Mid' rating in Schools but I am not a position to rate it for Tennessee. TerriersFan (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Internet brigades (2nd nomination)

message: This fucking thing is totally unprovable as well as irrefutable. Any claim made about the speculated activity is therefore total crap, and has no place in Wikipedia. The belief in this conspiracy theory may be notable as such. Or does it really rise above the "believe everything bad you hear about Russia" background noise? -- Petri Krohn 09:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This only means: you do not like the article. That is fine. But my or your opinions or beliefs are completely irrelevant. We are not doing any OR here. Let's simply follow Wikipedia:Attribution rules. I believe all sources in the article are reliable. Only one of them (made by a Russian state official) claims this to be a conspiracy theory, and only with regard to Russian (not Chinese) secret internet police.  Looks like a minority opinion. You are welcome to find any other good sources claiming this to be a conspiracy theory and include such references in the article. So, this is easy to correct. We are not suppose to prove anything according to Wikipedia:Attribution. Biophys 19:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Again, no one disputed realiability of any specific sources during the deletion discussion.Biophys 03:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have disputed some of the instances such not showing the real source of Tygodnik Powszechny allegations and allegations of creating Livejournal fighters teams at the [Internet brigades] talk page. Please do not mislead the readers by claiming that no one disputed your article. It has been marked as "totallydisputed" just because everything is disputed.Vlad fedorov 03:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unprovable and irrefutable 

message: I suspect this is now contaminated with external influences because of this page.
I agree.  Linking to this discussion from slashdot will definitely get this page a lot more attention, and this discussion will get a lot more attention.  As a random visitor from /. myself, I also felt compelled to add to this flamewar discussion with a few points.  
*I'm tempted to close this debate early as a trainwreck due to the influx of single-purpose accounts. Whether I close it now or let it finish, no clear consensus is going to emerge. Thanks, slashdot. Kafziel Talk 18:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: AfD and Deletion review previously were also influxed by troll squads, virtuals and one day accounts, so what you expect of this second nomination? Everybody likes Russia and wants to help it to become more democratic by publishing some slander. If you slander me, I would be more democratic, indeed. Proxy-checking may help!!!Vlad fedorov 18:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Slashdot link
Talk:United Railways and Electric Company

message: What was the track gauge? Was it ? Peter Horn User talk 02:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: THe answer is in History of MTA Maryland Peter Horn User talk 02:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, what was the DC voltage? Peter Horn User talk 03:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the track gauge 

message: United Railways and Electric Company#List of streetcar lines Which was the former route 25? Peter Horn User talk 13:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, what were the streetcar route numbers? Peter Horn User talk 03:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which was the former route 25
Talk:1st Army Corps (France)

message: I think this article is a bit limited, the I Corps was also active during World War I and the Cold War (then a part of the French Force in Germany). The french established permant corps during peacetime after the Franco-Prussian War, copying the Prussian model. Carl Logan 17:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello - Agree it could be expanded, although the sources I have at hand are Second World War-focused.  I can probably get enough information about the First War from the internet, but it might be difficult to find enough information for the eras when France was at peace.  Cheers, W. B. Wilson 03:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope?
Talk:Glasgow Fort

message: This article was redirected to Easterhouse as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash - tk 16:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Portland Transit Mall

message: * https://trid.trb.org/view/204653
truflip99 (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Spawn 2

message: Spawn 2 is out already go to blockbuster.com to check it out I just rented it and finished it and theres plenty of spawn with speaking roles in it. Its also been out for a while;atleast  year. -Debo7
:This article is about the expected live action film, not the second DVD of the animated series. Drewcifer3000 05:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Miriam Young

message: *@User:Intgr: Regarding this edit, GNG says absolutely no such thing. It says that multiple sources are generally expected (ie in more than 50% of cases). There is near unanimous consensus that an NYT obituary is one of the exceptions envisaged by GNG. In any event, there are other sources easily findable with Google, including reviews that satisfy AUTHOR. James500 (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Yeşilova Höyük

message: This article states the discovery of Yeşilova Höyük occurred in 2003, while the page on İzmir states it was 2004.  The external links do not prominently display the discovery date.  A knowledgeable individual may wish to synchronize the dates.  jchristopher 22:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery date?
Talk:Andrew Biggs

message: It's quite surprising that there is no mention of his personal life or if he is married. In Thailand, the second question an exxpat often gets is whether they are married or have a family. Is he married? To whom? Does he have children? Etc. 1.46.105.98 (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add information about his personal life: wife and family?
Talk:Nguyễn Hoàng

message: Where is the discussion that led to this page move? Badagnani (talk) 01:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Trịnh–Nguyễn War

message: *
*
*
*
*
The Nguyen used Chinese style galleys to defeat the Dutch in 1643.
http://books.google.com/books?id=vxgHExnla4MC&pg=PA230&dq=1643+dutch+vietnam&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_PG4UoCxI8jRsATg5oHgBg&ved=0CGYQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=1643%20dutch%20vietnam&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=dFFfRz8tBrMC&pg=PA83&dq=1643+dutch+vietnam&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_PG4UoCxI8jRsATg5oHgBg&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=1643%20dutch%20vietnam&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=Nyztp5ePh7QC&pg=PA23&dq=1643+dutch+vietnam&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_PG4UoCxI8jRsATg5oHgBg&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=1643%20dutch%20vietnam&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=z1WrsVncDqEC&pg=PA96&dq=1643+dutch+vietnam&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_PG4UoCxI8jRsATg5oHgBg&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAQ
http://books.google.com/books?id=ASe0AAAAIAAJ&q=1643+dutch+vietnam&dq=1643+dutch+vietnam&hl=en&sa=X&ei=JPm4Uq3yLcinsQScg4GgCw&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBzge
Rajmaan (talk) 19:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Nguyen naval victory against the Dutch in 1643
Talk:Vamachara

message: Hello everyone. I'm thinking that the image of the dakini on the article page isn't the most appropriate image as the dakini is mostly found in Vajrayana Buddhism. I am up for looking for another more relevant photo to put there (perhaps fierce Tara or Kali or a Mahavidya?) yet wanted to ask you all for input before I change it out. Best, AD64 (talk) 17:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What about this photo? The caption could read something like: "Puja at the temple of the left-handed Goddess Kamakhya."
Best, AD64 (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Good idea. I've swapped in the image. Skyerise (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  different photo?
Talk:Auto GP

message: Should it not be a priority to create pages for 2006 Euroseries 3000 season, 2007 Euroseries 3000 season and 2008 Euroseries 3000 season? Where would the relevent race information be got from? There are a lot of incomplete race seasons around the lesser racing formulae: I think it's important that they are filled in. Another one that comes to mind is the 2008 International Formula Master season Suggestions? Officially Mr X (talk) 22:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing racing seasons 
Talk:Linda Wagenmakers

message: She finished only 13th  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.184.203.212 (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 PLACES 
Category talk:Wikipedia scripts

message: Do you have to restart your browser before using this? Saturation2 If you are bored, talk to me, or you can look at my edits here. Sign here if you love me. 16:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restart? 

message: I am not sure how to work a script, can someone help me? The articles don't seem to help me. Karonaway (talk) 02:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How-to?
Talk:Buckland, Portsmouth

message: Recomend against merge proposal since notability can be asserted:
Buckland was mentioned in the Domesday Book.  
And is the birthplace of notable author Charles Dickens.
Also to merge would overburden an already large article about the city. 
-- Drappel 16:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge to Portsmouth
Talk:Copnor

message: As Copenore was one of only three villages listed as being on Portsea Island in the Domesday book it has a degree of noteability and also I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page.  Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 20:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Selma Union Depot

message: While we're at it, does anybody have anything at all on the architect A.M. Griffin? The only A.M. Griffin I've been finding on the web is the writer. I tried Oxford's website, the damn thing wouldn't even let me change the page to "G." ---------User:DanTD (talk)  02:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I found three Google books that mention him: a mention about California, (as a reference only), (also as a reference). epicgenius (talk) 03:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: More mysteries
Talk:Karadeniz Technical University

message: == This University was divided into many other Universities ==
Karadeniz Technical University was one of the largest universities spread along the eastern Black Sea Coastal Region of Turkey and it had many faculties. However, due to the recent University boom trend in Turkey, Some of the faculties were held by recently opened Universities. Therefore, this Article needs a comprehensive change. To Give an example, there is no Fatih Campus anymore belonging to Karadeniz Technical University today. Fatih campus was converted to a newly opened university called Trabzon University.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForTheScience (talk • contribs) 01:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Karadeniz Technical University was one of the largest universities spread along the eastern Black Sea Coastal Region of Turkey and it had many faculties. However, due to the recent University boom trend in Turkey, Some of the faculties were held by recently opened Universities. Therefore, this Article needs a comprehensive change. To Give an example, there is no Fatih Campus anymore belonging to Karadeniz Technical University today. Fatih campus was converted to a newly opened university called Trabzon University.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForTheScience (talk • contribs) 01:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This University was divided into many other Universities
Talk:Jorvik Viking Centre

message: I went today.  It was one of the most dismal museum visits I have endured.  It doesn't feel encyclopedic to warn people to stay away but I wish someone had helped save me my £9!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.249.152 (talk) 22:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unattractive attraction?

message: Perhaps you might want to use "Box Office Archaeology: Refining Hollywood’s Portrayals of the Past"'s chapter on Vikings as a reference to the Hollywood portrayal of Vikings? :) (Heidi.Goodine (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Other commenter reviews
Talk:Canisteo (village), New York

message: I have a letter written to the then Mayor (William Adams) of Canisteo from Commander Fenton. smada@twcny.rr.com  Great, but that doesn't help the average encylopædia reader; can you extract anything of value from it for us?  Cheers, Lindsay 17:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed
Talk:Glasflügel

message: Sailplane and glider are used interchangeably among the english-speaking adepts of the sport of gliding (or soaring).Francisco de Almeida 17:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Slovak Resistance Air Force

message: 1st Czechoslovak Fighter Air Regiment had no Lavochkin La-7 at the time of Slovak national uprising. Regiment was armed with this type later after retreat from Slovakia. --91.127.71.7 17:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Suggest we tell the truth and say it was pro SOVIET. No, they are not the same thing AT ALL.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.128.55 (talk) 03:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-Allied?
Talk:ABC Weekend TV

message: :Image:Abc-tv-60logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Abc-tv-60logo.jpg
Talk:Dotfuscator

message: Superior protection? That is biased right there. I demand that phrase be replaced and competing products be listed somewhere on this page. 68.236.176.23 17:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Just made a crappy stub that reads like a blog post. Do what you want, but please don't allow Preemptive employees spam it again :(
109.173.135.185 (talk) 11:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing this spam 

message: "doesn't do much else than name mangling."? Sounds very unprofessional.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.253.226.1 (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "free" edition available to Visual Studio owners doesn't do much else than name mangling. 

message: "It analyzes applications and makes them smaller, faster and harder to reverse-engineer."
Excuse me if I am mistaken, but among the cited references is no direct mentioning of a significant speed gain through Dotfuscator and the article itself does not give any information how this speed gain would be achieved. /January 16th 2014, GMT 00:09  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.168.110.47 (talk) 00:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there still Advertisement? 

message: As per last revision, remove general impression of buzzword-laden advert card:
- no strings are encrypted to begin with
- "pruning" has no tech meaning, did someone copy paste from PR?
- linking what? do you mean unauthorized distribution?
- analytics in the context mean "accounting", e.g. "CPU time accounting", "logged-in time accounting".
- patent entry has no relevance, except as advert/PR.
- factually wrong feel-good PR, like "Microsoft's need for obfuscation of their .NET framework inside Visual Studio.". MSFT CIL assemblies aren't obfuscated by _any_ means!
- the linked-to MSDN source even has "PR" at the end of the address.
-deever (talk) 18:36, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  buzzword removal again 20141006