lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Medscape

message: It is advertised as a free service. It would be interesting to find out where does Medscape's revenue come from? Does Medscape sell sensitive private medical information to third parties?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.223.128.201 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is their revenue from? 

message: The purpose of the analysis was not to provide a comparison of the two. This point managed to escape the discussions. That it did escape the scrutiny of mainstream media is no surprise, though, since the overwhelming majority of medical journal articles is well beyond the ability of most writers in mainsteam media, to comprehend. This opinion is based on what I've read; nothing I've read outside of a medical journal but that pertains to a peer-reviewed journal article, is accurate and no article has ever reached an appropriate conclusion. It seems that media writers believe they can draw an epidemiological conclusion from a single study, whereas no author of a peer-reviewed journal article is capable of doing this. Kernel.package (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I went ahead and removed the offending sentence. Be bold! Tomásdearg92 (talk) 22:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream media's" attention was irrelevant 

message: "Medscape was birthed to solve a problem. The problem was that physicians were overwhelmed with information, but straining to access and focus on the knowledge that would actually improve patient care."
This appears to have been written by a drone in P.R. - totally and absolutely says nothing whatsoever. Now if you want interesting, it's the fact that they renamed to 98point6. Which they abandoned. But it's interesting to read how they came up with it, which was documented in a 1999 Slate article. It's been abandoned now, but then these guys went bankrupt. - Letsbefiends (talk) 11:20, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  You must be joking.  

message: i created a history section as well as a reception section, and added some more information to the article. let me know if you have any questions about my edits. thank you.GoGatorMeds (talk) 17:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  updated article 

message: I am working on finding some references to help develop the article. There is a dearth of secondary sources and they are made harder to find as searches tend to return primary. I am posting what I come across here. MrBill3 (talk) 07:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References. 

message: I need to know if a 619 result is concerning 2603:7080:4D01:E0F5:DD76:BA97:FF3A:2E2A (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  D-Dimer results 

message: My results are 619 2603:7080:4D01:E0F5:DD76:BA97:FF3A:2E2A (talk) 23:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  D diner results
Talk:CMD RAMLink

message: This article is notable for the simple fact that, until the release of the SuperCPU, the RAMLink was the largest RAM expansion available for the Commodore 64/128, and until the IDE64 was released, it was also the fastest disk-like storage device available for the C64.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanessaezekowitz (talk • contribs) 07:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:List of Disney's 101 Dalmatians characters

message: It looks like the merger was more or less done, but the old page was never redirected here and the title was not changed to reflect that this is not just the TV show. I have made those changes, if anything is missing, it would be preserve4d in the edit history of the merged article. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger/move

message: I come with this proposal to merge this list into an appropiate article because none of these characters have managed to prove notability (bar Cruella, obviously, but she has her own article), making appearances only within the 101 Dalmatians franchise and Disney media. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My only concern would be that the information on the characters in the books and movies would be merged into an article on the television series. I personally would prefer renaming this article and dropping the "Disney" part of it as it contains information from the originally books which are not Disney and the name gives undue weight to the movies and the television series. Miyagawa (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking about the same. My proposal there is to create a "Characters" section in the novel article and add the characters' appearances in the book into that section. Same with the films: add information of the characters' appearances in film into the respective articles. The pages of Cadpig, Lucky, etc. can be redirected to the book article since they are characters originating in the novel. However, none of these characters are notable, so a list for them is not separately needed. --LoЯd ۞pεth 18:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Code segment

message: "As a memory region, a code segment may be placed below the heap or stack in order to prevent heap and stack overflows from overwriting it."
Not too sure about the 'below' part. The stack is commonly implemented as 'upside-down' (pushing onto the stack reduces stack pointer register) so it would make more sense to have it in memory that is 'higher' than the stack.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.249.187.76 (talk) 13:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section 

message: Why is the code segment also called the text segment?
118.208.38.118 (talk) 09:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  terminology
Talk:Zero page

message: Doesn't the ARM microprocessor use a Zero page to store hardware vector tables?
ShakespeareFan00 20:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ARM? 

message: The main article would be improved if there were a paragraph on how the zero page could be moved around on the C-128 by adjusting the Direct Page register in the memory management unit.   Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 09:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direct Page register 

message: I know a lot of microcontrollers -- which often have built-in ram -- use a zero page for registers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.161.192 (talk) 07:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microcontrollers  

message: This paragraph doesn't really make sense. It perhaps describes one, or a few, historical 8-bit processors, but it does not at all describe the only 8-bit processors mentioned above the paragraph in the current page, the 6502 and the 6800. Thus "aforementioned" becomes a misdirection.
Absolute addresses are specified in 6800 machine code in one of two ways. One is the extended mode, which is two bytes or 16 bits. The other is the direct page (zero page) mode, which is one byte or 8 bits. In the direct page mode, the more significant 8 bits are implicitly zero, thus, page zero.
The 6502 inherits this addressing mode from the 6800, but WDC's literature calls it the zero page.
The way it reads now, it almost describes the 6502, but, if it is attempting to describe the 6502, it is conflating the size of the index registers with their use of the zero page, and just really doesn't quite describe things right. And it is missing the non-indexed use of the zero page. If this is important to discuss here (and it well might be, since it demonstrates how the zero page can be put to good use), it should be properly discussed in a section specific to either the 6502 or to using zero page variables as pointers.
The way it reads now, it does not describe the 6800 at all. The 6800 has a 16-bit index, and the only relevance to the direct page in the 6800 is that the direct page makes a good place to cache any variable, including index/pointer variables.
(I'd edit the page directly, but I've forgotten my password and the bot guard is preventing me from using today's temporary password.)
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:2650:7961:4100:5055:7C2E:E476:1E0C (talk) 07:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: The first two sections say exactly the same thing in a slightly different way. This is obviously unnecessary. 2A0E:1D47:4115:4800:63D5:1C22:1FA4:D70D (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition
Talk:Memory pool

message: A simple memory pool module can allocate for example 3 pools at compile time with block sizes optimized for the application, which deploys the module. The application can allocate, access and free memory with the following interface:
I think this phrasing is a bit confusing. Compile-time allocation would mean to me that the memory is already allocated and defined at compile time, e.g. stack memory. A memory pool instead will usually work based on heap memory which is first allocated at runtime. Even if this allocation happens soon at the start of the programme this is something different than allocation at compile time to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.114.211.6 (talk) 10:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Angel Munoz (CPL)

message: ----
This is clearly an interesting conversation, I marked it up a little bit to keep discussion orderly and in a manner consistent to a conversation.  Apologies to someone if I cut out a portion which you found relevant but to my mind, the discussion which is here now is indicative of the overall controversy here so far.  Since TroyMaclure went through such trouble to outline his problems with this article, I would suggest maybe if the editors can't resolve this themselves someone calls for opinions on this or asks for arbitration on this article to get some kind of help from more senior people on Wikipedia to resolve this.
Since I am in need of something to do and I keep seeing this page get edited, I'll see if I can provide some third-party method to this madness and rebalance the force here (sorta speak).  Here's what I think the editors here need to do.
Suggestions
* The sources here need revision, they are mostly hosted on webspace owned by the person this article is about, clearly that is not good.  Consider contacting the media companies involved asking if they have a hard-copy of these articles for use on the Internet.  Scanning images of newspaper articles is something I'm unclear on, you may ask for help on this one.
* Look over WP:POLICY
* Look over WP:NPOV as this article really skates on the edges of neutrality.
* Someone has nominated this article as not citing it's sources properly, run through policies for sourcing and check to make sure you're following the guidelines for proper sourcing
* Do not just haphazardly remove/add tagging to the article without at least providing reasoning for this; Wikipedia is a community project, it is not a sole-proprietorship like a corporation is.  Just because you write an article does not mean you understand the guidelines here or have carte-blanche  to say whatever.
ZBrannigan 18:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editor Arguing 

message: The opening statement(s) need to be revised with proper sources.  The material provided is from a website which quotes an article by a fifteen year old individual; hardly source worthy material IMO ZBrannigan 01:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observations 

message: non-notable. ZBrannigan 21:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD
Talk:Free list

message: This is a very poor treatment of the topic of free lists.
It can be noted that free-lists are the underlying implementation approach within many conventional memory managers, and have much more important and far-reaching approaches than linking together fixed-size blocks of memory. Cr88192 23:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Jwoodger (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

message: Hey. I'm planning on working to improve this article. If anyone else is working on
this, please post on my talk page and let me know! I'm sort of new around here,
so please let me know if I make any mistakes while working on this article. Blelbach (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article 

message: Does occur. I know that the old historic Unix filesystems stored the free space as a linked list of blocks on disk. (Or some optimization thereof.) This was readily seen from the `fsck` man page back in the day but I'm having trouble locating a suitable citation.12.139.157.2 (talk) 15:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  On-disk Free List
Talk:Out of memory

message: The term virtual memory was misused quite a bit on this page.  Virtual memory is not the same as swap space, rather, VM is the system by which applications are given 'memory' which could be mapped to one of many backing stores, namely, RAM, a file (via mmap), or swap space.  I tried to improve the factual accuracy of this page, but I was also afraid to try to go too far into what is virtual memory.  But, it's hard to explain what 'out of memory' means when there are two substantially different concepts of memory. Bugg42 (talk) 06:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of 'virtual memory' 

message: The linux OOM Killer should have it's own article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.107.188.5 (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Linux OOM Killer 

message: Quote: "Due to Moore's law, the amount of physical memory in all computers has grown almost exponentially".  Wow, thanks Gordon!  
More seriously, perhaps a rewording along the lines of "As predicted by Moore's Law..."?
: --M4gnum0n (talk) 13:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moore's Law is not a mandate 

message: Article uses phrase "Modern operating systems" and "modern computers".  "Modern" is vague and relative to the period of time this was/is written. (?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djk44883 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Modern" is relative to period when it was written
Category talk:Physical systems

message: It appears that a Wikipedia:Categories for discussion CFD for Category talk:Physical systems, which reached Keep [Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 July 21 2023] is the latest breadcrumb for a process that appears to be lost in the weeds. 
One oddity is that the decision was reached on July 30 2023, but the log is not dated 30 July 2023.
For what it's worth, I manually fixed the cat page; the status message said manually reverted which is an unexpected status. -- Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 19:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did a maintenance process just stop, or has a process hung up?
Talk:List of 3D graphics libraries

message: How about some defunct API's?
3dfx' Glide, S3's MeTaL, PowerVR's SGL
NitroX infinity 09:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: API wasnt quite dead-pls post a link! !#@!$$##@%$#^%%^&^%&  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.110.106 (talk) 22:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct API's? 

message: I propose that this article be combined with Graphics library article, as this duplicates this list on that article, and some of the products listed on this article (such as OpenSceneGraph) would, I believe, be more accurately described as "Graphics libraries" then "graphics APIs," a term which is usually reserved for lower-level APIs like DirectX and OpenGL.  The products listered here could also have the 
:Category:Graphics libraries
category applied to them, which could serge as the list in addition to those mentioned in the Graphics library article, since there are no descriptions or detail columns provided in this list article.
--Dlee3d (talk) 06:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree --Ne0 (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Graphics library article and category

message: This is the right place for everything: List of game engines 120.151.160.158 (talk) 01:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into List of game engines article and category

message: source: https://webgl2fundamentals.org/webgl/lessons/webgl-2d-vs-3d-library.html
there should also be some clarity that only older versions of OpenGL are "3D libraries", and I don't think Direct3D counts as a 3D library anymore (it is now similar to Vulkan/Metal) Eteled286 (talk) 01:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WebGL is not a 3D library (and other APIs)
Talk:Microsoft Message Queuing

message: There's no RPC port at TCP/IP stack. It uses RCP on TCP port 2101, 2103, 2105...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.140.156.64 (talk) 14:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Apache ActiveMQ

message: Moreover, the first two paragraphs of this article show very poor grammar. I suspect non-native English. 91.63.207.98 (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:List of ABC television affiliates (table)

message: I'm sorry, I requested this block to prevent the removal of the DMA numbers from the O&O table. User:DreamMcQueen wants to vandalize this page by removing the DMAs from the article. The continual edit warring between me and him forced me to ask administrators to impose a one week block on this list as we attempt to settle ourselves. Thank you for your understanding. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234)   12:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the entry locked from editing? 

message: I am proposing that all disambiguation pages containing ABC ## (where ## determines the channel number) be merged into List of ABC television affiliates (table). This is to reduce the amount of disambiguation pages where there are many affiliates sharing the same channel number. In addition, the context can be explained better and will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Do you have any objections? J4lambert (talk) 13:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:List of ADV releases

message: This article has the clean up tag on it, but no explanation along with it. What exactly needs to be cleaned up? 68.228.80.106 03:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has a bunch of ratings besides titles that don't belong there, and needs some basic formatting and other tweaking. AnmaFinotera (talk) 06:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Does this really want to be an article? I confess this looks like something better handled with a category, similar to :Category:Viz Media. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree. It (and some others) were created probably from seeing one article have it (like some of the movie production companies).  I think categories would be way cleaner though. AnmaFinotera (talk) 15:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I added :Category:ADV Films to all of the links on the article page, so this page is now redundant.  There is no reason to keep it here. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 03:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! Much much thanks for your help in tackling such a big project! And agreed, now that they are all tagged, this list needs to go.AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: This list has been redirected to the main A.D Vision article's section on ADV Films, as it can not be directly redirected to the category and the PROD was contested. AnmaFinotera (talk) 01:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:List of AIHL seasons

message: Does this article need to be separate to Australian Ice Hockey League? I think it would probably be better if it was merged in to Australian Ice Hockey League until it is substantially bigger -- JD554 10:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NO. This is standard for lists of seasons, however the champions should be removed from the list. Flibirigit 05:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you say so. There was, of course, no need to shout. -- JD554 08:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Leaders of the Australian Labor Party

message: I'm unsure as to why there was a specification to only include past premiers in the lists of state and territory leaders. The federal list includes all leaders, whether past or present, prime minister or opposition leader. I feel as if this article should either include every state/territory leader, or none at all. RoadSmasher420 (talk) 07:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  State and territory leadership
Talk:Java Metadata Interface

message: The redirect JMI has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 10:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:JMI]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting

message: This article has just been renamed and moved from OAI-PMH to PMH.  This move should be reverted - the commonname for this protocol is OAI-PMH, not PMH, as is evidenced by the clear majority of sources discussing it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed rename 

message: The list of software which supports OAI-PMH, in the section "Software", appears to be quite random: it includes both very common and very obscure software. Is there some official or pseudo-official "registry" of repository software compliant with OAI-PMH (which we could point to as exhaustive reference) and some reliable source for the most "important" of them (which could then be listed in the article directly)? Nemo 15:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of software 
Talk:List of Apache–MySQL–PHP packages

message: The external links here should be removed.  See WP:EL and WP:NOT#LINK. --Ronz 01:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I removed the external links and the article is now clean. (Requestion 13:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Linkfarm

message: Most Linux distributions include the AMP software by default.  This includes most of the full Linux LiveCDs, so anyone can easily try this software.  But the smaller "lite" Linux LiveCD versions do not include this software bundle by default.  And it seems that no other major OS includes this software by default?-69.87.199.127 (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linux includes AMP 

message: "Comparison of WAMPs" page has been deleted. So contents of Windows scetion should be edited.VarunAgw (talk) 16:39, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows section