Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Hampshire

message: I have nominated The Green (Dartmouth College) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR for [[The Green (Dartmouth College)]] 

message: I'd like to create an article for the role of state adjutant general of New Hampshire. Looking at this role in other states, there is variance in how existing Wikipedia articles are titled:
* X Adjutant General
**Connecticut Adjutant General
**Indiana Adjutant General
**Puerto Rico Adjutant General
**South Carolina Adjutant General
* Adjutant General of X
**Adjutant General of Kansas
**Adjutant General of Maryland
**Adjutant General of Massachusetts
**Adjutant General of New York
**Adjutant General of North Carolina
**Adjutant General of North Dakota
**Adjutant General of Oklahoma
**Adjutant General of Texas
*Adjutant general of X ("general" not capitalized)
**Adjutant general of Illinois
The state's website also uses inconsistent wording, such as "The Adjutant General, New Hampshire" here and "Adjutant General of the State of New Hampshire" here.
I propose titling the article Adjutant General of New Hampshire, which follows the format used by a majority of existing pages (above) and is consistent with Attorney General of New Hampshire and Governor of New Hampshire. Comments from other editors welcome. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjutant General of New Hampshire 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Drafts for the following missing articles for New Hampshire Supreme Court justices have been initiated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices#New Hampshire:
Any help getting these articles finished and moved to mainspace would be appreciated. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drafts for missing New Hampshire Supreme Court Justices 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]]