Talk:Franchise tag

message: Since the vast majority of players get the non-exclusive tag, shouldn't those be the #s used? Samer (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: Matt Cassel seems to have gotten an exclusive tag, $14M.  
As a separate issue, showing the exclusive tag costs for 2009 and the non-exclusive tag costs for 2008 hides the non-exclusive tag costs of 2008.  Ideally, we would show the exclusive tag costs for each year and the non-exclusive tag costs can be extrapolated from there (by simply looking at the previous year).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.81.178 (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt Cassel 

message: I assume this might have something to do with the players contract, but maybe something else determines if an exclusive or non-exclusive tag is used?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.113.221 (talk) 05:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Is It Determined If The Tag Is Exclusive or Non-Exclusive 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Franchise tag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090225221133/http://www.stltoday.com:80/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/rams/story/981F8BA7CE1D8E018625756200176CA1?OpenDocument to http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/rams/story/981F8BA7CE1D8E018625756200176CA1?OpenDocument
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080223082243/http://dallascowboys.com:80/news.cfm?id=3DBAF404-FDA9-3471-EAB18B9B89427C24 to http://www.dallascowboys.com/news.cfm?id=3DBAF404-FDA9-3471-EAB18B9B89427C24
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The table is currently in dollars, but the values are all in the millions range and are rounded to thousands. That means every entry has a ",000", which takes up space in a fairly wide table and makes visual distraction from the actual differences among values. Converting to millions of dollars would look a lot cleaner and clearer I think. Any objections? DMacks (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That is, either  or . DMacks (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert salaries-table to $millions 

message: just looking at this article, i could tell there must be some kind of behind the scenes edit war going on. Click "history" and I see 40,000 characters repeatedly added and deleted. lol.
what is the problem with the 40,000 that keep getting deleted? this article is a weird stub without them.
just my opinion.
69.162.253.10 (talk) 06:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I read a little deeper, and the objection with the 40,000 characters seems to be that they're a list? Idk. I think that information has merit and should be listed somewhere. Can't it be spun off into its own article "List of NFL Franchise Tags" or something? I don't agree with the reasoning to delete that information entirely. It could be relevant. It could be information people are coming here to find out. Somebody plz fix this article. 69.162.253.10 (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  where's the article?