lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Static (Static Shock)

message: This article should be merged with the main article for the character, rather than duplicating information. Tverbeek 12:44, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Someone (I'm guessing from the repetition of his previous activity that it's User:Mare-Silverus) has been inserting quotes at the top of this article and two others about Static.  As I've explained to him, they do not belong there; this is an encyclopedia, not a fan site, and there are standards for how articles should be structured and what they should contain.  This is why I keep removing those quotes, and will continue to remove them as often as necessary.  If the person who keeps adding them would like to act like an adult and discuss it, that would be very welcome. Tverbeek 18:00, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate additions
Talk:Equity (finance)

message: The proper name for this account is "Owners Equity" and it is for proprietorships only, not corporations, which use Shareholders' equity. Octopus-Hands 09:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that "owners" with no apostrophe? Not "owner's" or "owners'"? — Saxifrage ✎ 00:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move article discussion

message: In the "Real Estate equity" section, the sentence is not complete at the end of the paragraph. Can someone fix this please and then delete this discussion topic. Thanks.
Sky Apperley 07:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be complete now. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section not complete 

message: I am curious about the last sentence in the "Real Estate Equity" section...
It is my understand that Equity = Assets - Liabilities. In real estate, the equation seems to be Equity = Market Price in home - Liabilities. In other words, in real estate, the equation looks like this: Equity = Assets (market price of your home) - Liabilities.  The two equation seems to be very similar (the same?), not the exact opposite. Am I missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 19:32, 5 December 2007  (talk) Venomous Pen 
:++++
:Ye I agree. How is it that this real estate equity is opposite from equity in accounting. Unless he is challenging using market price and not historical cost as a valuation of the property which still doesn't make sense. Whoever wrote that section must have no idea what he is talking about, and it got approved by wiki. OMG.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.164.60.87 (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am no accountant, but the paragraph made no sense as it stood.  I have removed the 'exact opposite' sentence.  Thanks for pointing it out.  Next time, be bold.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is it the "exact opposite?" 

message: I have been a writer in the financial industry (equities) for several years. I can help out here. ````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valterre (talk • contribs) 01:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Financial Expert

message: Shareholders' equity is a sub-topic of ownership equity.  The overlap between the two concepts would be less confusing for both readers and editors, if both topics were discussed in full in the Ownership equity article.  I am sorry that I don't have time to do this at the moment, but I think this is uncontroversial, so if you have time, I recommend that you act boldly and write shareholder's equity as a section of the ownership equity article. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: "the mutual funds are typically managed by prominent fund management firms, such as Schroders, Fidelity Investments or The Vanguard Group."
Can we add Bob's Screendoor and Asset Management Fund Inc.? Wow free advertising!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.247.231.155 (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ads Available?

message: Rich bitch way 104.54.184.217 (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm very sleepy
Talk:Liability

message: "where assets are what you own, liabilities are what you owe to others, and equity is what you have contributed to the venture."
*where assets are what you own, liabilities are what you owe to others, and equity is what is left.
*It does not have to be a venture.  You do not have to contribute anything to gain assets in all cases.  GT
would it not be interesting to know, if there is any criminal liability of the auditors? at least some words concerning the civil liability (enron, worldcom etc.) would be welcome for wider audiances as well...
I cleaned up the accounting discussion and made it consistent with my edit of assets. This article obviously needs additional editing.--Lance 04:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote

message: :A deposit to the bank is treated as a "credit" because the bank's liability its customers the depositor increases.
Pardon? Gondooley 17:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An example 

message: This article should be split and converted to a disambiguation page. Accounting liability, legal liability,  and other liabilities are notable enough to deserve their own article.Smallman12q (talk) 14:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Split. I agree that multiple articles for this topic would be both justified and more useful. chrylis (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Kent County, New Brunswick

message: I can't seem to get the map to display here correctly.  I'll contact administrators about this, but if somebody is able to fix it in the meantime, please feel free.  Cheers, Plasma east 05:30, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks like there's an entire province between them. --Walter Görlitz 06:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Richibucto 15, Ontario in New Brunswick?
Talk:Portage Glacier

message: Page is and will be in process.
--Gypsyleathers 15:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: Included info about Begich,Boggs Visitor Center, also referenced Burns Glacier often mistaken for Portage Glacier (which I first did myself years ago)  --Gypsyleathers 17:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burning Organ

message: Paul Gilbert is not "formerly of" Racer X. He is still a member of the band, and the band is inactive (but there has been no break-up).
74.166.48.16 22:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chris Cairns

message: There's no section on Chris' personal life, for example his sister was killed in an accident between a train an a concrete truck http://www.tracksafe.co.nz/supporters.html which caused Chris to start a charity (name now changed). Also, this page will be of interest at the moment because Chris is currently before the courts in proceedings related to match fixing.
The above comments have been incorporated. Need deleting.
The phrasing about a 'major heart attack which caused an aortic dissection' is wrong. Needs amendment. Confusion around an aortic dissection being a heart condition is common especially in media reports and is medically wrong, but could be the source of this wording, simply by quoting such wrong wording without checking the accuracy of such quotes. A heart attack cannot "cause" an aortic dissection. Aortic dissections are a product of the characteristics of the aorta, not the heart. However, an aortic dissection can produce a reduction in blood flow to the coronary arteries as the tissues of the aortic root can swell and cause blockage/partial blockage of the  coronaries, thus showing the signs of a heart attack. But the heart attack is then said to be secondary to the AD.  MIs like this are thought to happen in around 7% of ADs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IdidntgetwhereIamCJ (talk • contribs) 09:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 

message: Do we really need the word 'champion' before 'all rounder' ?  Surely that is not objective! Novacatz 07:12, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We have "Christopher" in the article title and "Chris" in the infobox; shouldn't these be standardised, and if so what to? Loganberry (Talk) 01:33, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wondering why Christopher was chosen for the location, rather than Chris --Paul 05:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris(topher)? 
Talk:Imran (father of Mary)

message: Q: Imran is distinct from Amram, should not redirect there.
Should be merged into Joachim (Mary's father according to Christian tradition) or Virgin Mary#Mary in the Qur'an.  Eluchil404 04:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Ok first of all in Islamic tradition, Marym the mother of Isa is of the house of Amram, i.e. she is a of the Aaronite line of Highpriestly families as was her uncle Zakariya and her cousin Yahiyya. So this article exists on a mistaken separation of this Imran from amram. Tut tut.as for user 208.3.12.18, chill out Dude this is the islamic tradition on Marym's ancestry not the protestant biblical exegesis of Luke's Gospel.82.6.29.26 (talk) 00:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone has messed up
Talk:Irod

message: When did it begin ? Nicolas1981 (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When ? 
Talk:Geography of the Dominican Republic

message: A controversy has erupted over the choice of map for this article. The two candidates are shown here, along with any others that other Wikipedians may choose to enter. Feel free to make any comments. The lower map may also appear in the corresponding Geography article for this country. Kelisi 03:07, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country Map 

message: I have made a completely new version of the article. I hope that someone could check the English and see if there is any error. I will try to see if the other map is more appropriate. --Pepemar2 (talk) 00:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-writing the article 

message: Why did Gabriel add in two paragraphs that say nearly the same thing, but contradict each other on the land area?--RosicrucianTalk 05:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you compare all the edits of Gabril on 12 January you can see that they are some kind of vandalism, changing the map, eliminating cites and so on. It seems that he want to destroy everything that I have done; I accept changes if they justified. I revert to a previous version, discarding all his changes. Regarding the area of the country, we might wait to see if we can greet what to put in the Dominican Republic page. --Pepemar2 (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article contradicts itself. 

message: Maritime claims are missing. Peter Horn User talk 16:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Now to be found in Geography of the Dominican Republic#Statistics Peter Horn User talk 16:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maritime claims 
Talk:Positron electron annihilation reaction

message: This article, at
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_electron_annihilation_reaction>,
appears to be a copyright violation.
It is almost identical (including typos and grammatical errors) to
<http://www.amershamhealth.com/medcyclopaedia/medical/volume%20I/ANNIHILATION%20REACTION.ASP>,
and that page's terms of service at
<http://www.ge.com/en/ge/gl_terms.htm> would clearly prohibit copying
thence to Wikipedia without attribution; but the Wikipedia page never
mentions Medcyclopaedia.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possible_copyright_infringements#Copyright_infringement_notice>
describes what to do in cases where a copyright infringement
has surely occurred, but right now (2005-01-18=Tu 01:36 -0800)
I'm getting such slow response from the Wikipedia server that
I can't continue the editing process.  Also, I just created my
Wikipedia account, so I'm too much a novice to feel comfortable
deleting other people's articles.  (For example, nothing in
the Medcyclopaedia article either asserts or denies that that
article was copied from the Wikipedia article, instead of the
other way around.  The original author should be queried.)
I'd appreciate it if someone more experienced could take over
at this point.  If nobody does, then if I have time in a few
days I'll try again and see whether the Wikipedia server then
gives me a fast enough response to let me investigate further.
This article should probably be merged into this one - has a much more intuitive name.
Chris 1127 10:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Chess Players (Eakins)

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 09:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag
Talk:Cape Point

message: Each cape is at sea level, by definition.  Perhaps what is meant is further North?  Or is this a comment on the height of the view points at the capes?  Paul Beardsell 09:55, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would assume the latter, as in height of the view points above sea level.  Dewet 14:16, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Higher? 

message: Cape Point is not the meeting point of the two currents - this is an old myth. I've also never heard it considered as the southernmost point of Africa - even the old Dutch navigators could tell latitude? Will remove these claims for now. Greenman 12:40, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two currents, and southernmost point 

message: This article is, overall, very good IMO.  There are a few bits which I think could be made more encyclopedic in tone; like "over and over again ad nauseam", "if the reader will kindly excuse the term".  I'll get to this when time allows, if no-one else does.  — Johan the Ghost seance 16:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone issues 

message: 198.174.52.14 added "The South Latitude of Cape Point should be changed to 34 21 24" at the bottom of the article. Have moved the claim to the talk page. Greenman 10:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Dietrich Grönemeyer

message: I am concerned about the accuracy/validity of the Awards listed. It would be good if someone with some real knowledge of this could have a look at it and cite their sources. 
Here's what I have done and why:
* English award - removed it - can't understand what it is. This was listed as ""Man of the Millennium" (England)". Plus I can't even find him on what appears to be their website. If I am wrong please reinstate and cite sources. 
* USA award - removed it. It was listed as ""Man of the Year" 2000 (USA)" but this is on first impressions ludicrous (though your mileage may vary) - that is usually taken to mean Man of the Year (now Person of the Year) as in the Time magazine "award" - but that year it was George Bush! Now it may well be that Prof Grönemeyer was awarded A "Man of the Year" award in say a medical speciality or something else, but if so, we need to say so rather than have this seemingly misleading entry. If I am wrong please reinstate and cite sources.
* German award (Hamburg) - left it - appears to be accurate, can find Prof G on their site etc. 
Please note that I am not suggesting that there is anything remotely questionable about these awards in any way whatsoever. I am just saying that if we list stuff like this it should be verifiably accurate. I will be very happy to see the material I removed replaced with material that accurately reflects Prof. Grönemeyer's awards in a way that is easily comprehensible. This, in my view, was not. 138.37.188.109 10:34, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sorry, just translated it from the German website, will now ask there. Get-back-world-respect 13:35, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one, thanks. I see your query in the Diskussion page for the de version: that's great. Personally I would not dare to lay a finger on the de one so I will watch with interest.  Are you a Herbie fan or did something else lead you to be writing about his big bro? :) 138.37.188.109 08:54, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As there are so many Herbie fans in Germany I had heard of his brother via my uncle who is a doctor in the same region. I found out more about him when reading the german Herbie article. Dietrich has the information I translated on his official webpage. I agree with you that this is misleading. As he should know that, it seems a bit like showing off. Get-back-world-respect 23:22, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards
Talk:Four-thousand footers

message: I suggest that this article be kept in the "Mountaineering" category and dropped from the "Geography of New Hampshire" category, because there is an independent article  List of mountains in New Hampshire.  The immediate article covers the NE 4K and 100 Highest, which is not properly exclusively NH geography.  The "List" article should be included in the "Geography of New Hampshire" category and renamed Mountains of New Hampshire so as to be consistent with the format for other geographical features. It can refer to the 4K Footers article and peaks appropriately marked as listed, but could also include others, such as Clay (er, Reagan), Jim, and smaller peaks such as Monadnock.  Thoughts? FrostHeaves 03:01, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split/Merge/Reassign? 

message: From reading this article, it would seem that this refers entirely to mountains in the USA. This doesn't seem to be stated anywhere, however, and until I read references to the AMC and New Hampshire I assumed this referred to all 4000ft. mountains *worldwide*. I'm not sure whether my interpretation is correct or not, so could somebody clarify the article? -Zepheriah (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a bit. Is it better now or does it need more? Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  World view/Vague
Talk:Venus and Mars (Wings album)

message: McCartney didn't know Lennon was planning a visit until after he was murdered.  First, May Pang told McCartney in the 80's (who thought she was just being kind) but it was confirmed in the 90's when McCartney bought a postcard from Lennon to Derek Taylor on which he wrote he'd be "visiting the McCartknees in New Orleans."  As such, it's highly unlikely that Lennon and McCartney had planned a duet on "Call Me Back Again." Hotcop2 (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lennon's planned visit... 
Talk:Cinema of Hong Kong

message: This may be a resource for people developing this article:
*  (Archive dot today link)
Also I found a paper on Hong Kong films edited for Mainland China:
* 
Her whole thesis:
* 
It seems there are working paper versions:
*  - Paper Number: 103 September 2010 - Posted by the David C. Lam Institute for East-West Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University
WhisperToMe (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PhD thesis about Hong Kong triad films and working paper on HK films in Mainland China 

message: As per my  tag, a large part (perhaps the majority) of this article appears to be unreferenced original research which reads like a personal essay on the topic.
I do think it contains lots of interesting information, but it needs many more references in several sections to bring it up to Wikipedia standard.
95.145.86.26 (talk) 10:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Many More References
Talk:Kaiju Big Battel

message: This wiki needs a wikia. Kaiju.wiki.org or whatever is the norm. Im not a good wiki editor/writer so Im just putting it out there. DontEatRawHagis (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: http://kaijubigbattel.wikia.com/wiki/Kaiju_Big_Battel_Wiki is the website, has been around for a while. Updated the broken link to the wiki site. --DontEatRawHagis (talk) 04:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Need of a Wikia

message: This graphic looks like it was taken from an online shopping site. What exactly classifies these as "official" DVDs? The KBB website lists many, many more videos and they are all for sale. http://www.kaiju.com/mall_dvd.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exs10s (talk • contribs) 01:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official DVDs 

message: The article sat for years with 32k of text based on zero independent sources and excessive/extensive in-universe backstory. I like kbb, but anything included in the article should be supported by reliable sources that are independent of the subject, not a glut of text that looks like it was taken directly from an official site or fan wiki. The text is still there in the article history if anyone would like to restore with sources. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 06:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut 30k of text 

message: thanks for adding to the article. Please do keep in mind that Wikipedia defers to secondary sources to decide what's important enough to include. I.e. That something exists or is relevant to the subject isn't mean it should be included (otherwise Wikipedia would be a spam farm/directory/fan page). Could you add some secondary sources like newspapers, books, high quality magazines/websites, etc.? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary sourced content
Talk:Tea (disambiguation)

message: Where I grew up, in tasmania (australia), tea unambiguously refered to the evening meal, lunch unambiguously refered to the midday meal, and dinner refered to the main meal, at either midday or the evening. I think the word "tea" to refer to the evening meal is understood by other australians, but I've tried to stop saying it, it sometimes confuses people.
Also, the late afternoon/early evening break during cricket test matches is called tea. -- unknown
Yes the material on Australia is wrong.  Dinner can refer to either lunch or tea, depending on who you speak to! 115.64.190.214 (talk) 15:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tea/Dinner 

message: I think this edit is entirely correct, and for the reasons given. -MBHiii (talk) 17:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why?  Is it because its another one of your many sockpuppet postings? See :Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Mbhiii.   12.184.187.210 (talk) 00:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ...because it is reasoned, consistent, and to the point. Whose little sockpuppet are you? -74.162.147.56 (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ANOTHER SOCKPUPPET?! MBHiii, you are simply priceless! The Squicks (talk) 03:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's another. You people (and some Admins) seem to get confused over what a sockpuppet is. It's an anonymous site used deliberately to circumvent WP policy. Mistakes don't count, but they sure make a good diversion during an edit war. Anonymous editing is otherwise allowed at WP. -74.162.131.186 (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And another! It's like every single second you want to shriek "Please ban me! I really want you too!". The Squicks (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polemic
Talk:Services marketing

message: good sistoum test range and the federal government district bureau agency for sale for MD TEC ordering trust for nutrition- volt higher than+0.001 brane fire rate senaps normil v level @6, to 12 volts positive heat negative cold brane work on neg volts ecg elx maping bod movement visuals color volt levels ECG EKG broadband avionic radar system link mag exlrater iss ♠️🖤??? holding comparer I think linked static on all that did hold it qweast Stockwells kinedy 24.52.18.23 (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ccwbtaa3.0a what till I'm out back out side  I'll try stay quiet wait and not move around