lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James Lawton Collins

message: Tag added because this article was created by the article's grandson. Recommend User:Jlcollinsiii read WP:COI. Ronbo76 05:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, as per the wikilink to WP:COI, recommend that this user not edit this article. If any adjustments are necessary, please use this talkpage to suggest improvements. Ronbo76 05:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag 

message: Must have misread the article, and missed the notability-Empyrycal 06:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I believe the notability is established and do not contest that. However, I would like to see some other editors provide sources for this article. Ronbo76 06:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem was that the article didn't actually state, in very clear terms, that he was notable - hence my little error of judgement about the article. Anyway, it does need some sources now-Empyrycal 09:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oops, sorry about the <nowiki>{{db-bio}}</nowiki> 

message: I'm not sure either of these items belongs in the article so I've moved them here to talk. RJFJR (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Relations
Talk:Middle Turkic languages

message: It is claimed that it is an Oghuz language and the best known liteary form is Karakhanid (i.e., Chagatai language). I see a contradiction between these two phrases. Both Oghuz and Karakhanid are Turkic languages. But they constitute different branches of the same language. While the Book of Dede Korkut is in Oghuz, Ali-Shir Nava'i's works are in Chagatai.
Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oghuz or Chagatai
Talk:Tolga Kashif

message: As a result of its prior deletion, I have now allocated the relevant copyright tag for this image. The owner of this image has granted permission for it to be used in this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GTreseder1234 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Uploaded for Tolga Kashif
Talk:London Gas Museum

message: Unfortunately the London Gas Museum is no longer a museum and after careful renovation is in use as offices.  It would be interesting to know what happened to the gas powered radio.  There still remains a war memorial in the small gardens containing a gas lantern.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.51.190 (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

message: Does it still exist? Ifly6 (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existence
Talk:The Hollow (film)

message: *(cur | prev) 08:44, 14 December 2012‎ Bovineboy2008 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (32 bytes) (+32)‎ . . (Bovineboy2008 moved page The Hollow (2004 film) to The Hollow (film): no need for extra disambiguation) (thank)
It may be necessary to move back if The Hollow (2015 film) from Maneater (film series) ends up getting made. Ranze (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Future move
Talk:Markfield Beam Engine and Museum

message: Found an excellent resource at:  British History Online. The citation for the page reads:
:* 'Tottenham: Public services', A History of the County of Middlesex: Volume 5: Hendon, Kingsbury, Great Stanmore, Little Stanmore, Edmonton Enfield, Monken Hadley, South Mimms, Tottenham (1976), pp. 345-48. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=26992. Date accessed: 14 June 2007.
Provides a closer approximation for the opening date of the sewage works (plus lots more info), but still no exact fix.
===Picture source===
* http://www.ferrylane.org.uk/mbeam.html -- provides links to 6 linkable photos of the engine
EdJogg 18:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful References 

message: * http://www.ferrylane.org.uk/mbeam.html -- provides links to 6 linkable photos of the engine
EdJogg 18:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture source
Talk:Morden Hall Park

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is timeless

message: It definitely needs to be clarified that something notable now will still be notable in 20 years, and similarly that something notable 20 years ago is notable now. However, there are things which were notable, say, 500 years ago, that we can't have an article on simply because sources have been lost or destroyed. And in another 500 years, there will be things notable now which will have lost all their sources. And I don't think it's really made quite clear enough that this only applies assuming the ideal circumstances that all sources still survive. -Amarkov moo! 06:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's why I say "as long as sufficient reliable sources are present". --NE2 06:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good, but slightly misleading
Talk:Carnival of Binche

message: Ash Wednesday is at the beginning of Lent and these happen after Easter. Is this wednesday called Ash Wecnesday there?
Cosnahang 10:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The Ash Wednesday refered to in the text is the traditional Ash Wednesday I think. I'm not sure. The festivities end before Ash Wednesday, thats all I know. --- ÅñôñÿMôús  Dîššíd3nt 12:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Ash Wednesday 

message: Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  The french wikipedia is insufficient to support this article.  Don't we have something better? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 03:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, I know. I'll see what I can do. --- ÅñôñÿMôús  Dîššíd3nt 06:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Hmm.  I came here to make the same comment.  I'll come back if I find time. --Gronky 03:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Daseian notation

message: Great article!
it looks like the 2nd image (w/ the modern staff) was home generated; maybe it could be updated to include a clef?  From context it looks like it should be a treble clef--though would those be the actual pitches implied by the treatises (ie those octaves)?  I would figure the music there is meant for men to sing...  —Turangalila talk 15:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you're right, there should be a treble clef there. I pulled that image from Commons; I don't have the software capability to modify it, but if you're able to, you're welcome to change it or upload a better example. Chubbles 17:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, Turangalila and Chubbles, I have a hard time following your argument. Why would you say it needs a treble clef - which I understand to mean G4 on the second line of the stave, when you believe that it is meant for men to sing? Or did the image change since? — Sebastian 02:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the image is the same. The lowest note represented here is a G, which would imply treble clef; if we wanted to use bass clef, to indicate male voices, we'd need to move everything down one staff line. Chubbles (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you, I see the source of the confusion. You meant treble clef transposed by an octave (nowadays written with "8va" underneath, as is common for writing tenor lines). Yes, that would give you the range G2-C5 (using scientific pitch notation), which neatly fits to our article vocal range. But where do you get the information that "the lowest note represented here is a G[2]"? — Sebastian 19:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DasiaNotation2.jpg
Talk:Potton

message: This about the church.... the history starts in Domesday. See Countess Judith to start a history of this place ... Victuallers 14:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sure that members of the society are good and effective contributors to this wiki article, but does the society warrant a large paragraph all about itself in here? Particularly in view of the non-notability of most of the contents of it. Plingsby (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potton History Society 
Talk:One If By Land (Jericho episode)

message: Is there any source that indicates Maggie's last name? She appears to be simply credited as Maggie but in Semper Fidelis, she introduces herself as Mullin (or Mullen, the spelling is questionable). In the event she may be listed on Jericho character list, including her last name (since it was revealed in the episode) would be appropriate. So, is it Mullin or Mullen? --Kamikaze 17:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the Closed Captions it it Maggie Mullins. 209.37.141.254 17:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The closed captions could be in error. I hear no "s" at the end but rather something like Mullen. Nevertheless, I'm still searching for a proper source.--Kamikaze 17:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Ah, and in the Semper Fi she is mentioned as Mullen so the need for accuracy is strongly required.--Kamikaze 17:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maggie's Last Name?

message: Being that Jake and Robert aren't stupid they knew she couldn't be trusted. Apparently they aren't done using her. Lowellriggsiam 21:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Jake not find it HIGHLY suspicious that she was put in the jail cell and immediately began talking about "someone on the outside"?  If he was suspicious then he is definitely one cool customer to not show any sign of it.--Jwsmiths 00:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are refering to the end when she escaped the cell and ran out, getting shot in the process, there is a quick scene, easily missed if you look away, wherein she slips the keys off of another deputy's belt and palms them--Breandán 02:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mullen the traitor

message: Point conceeded.Lowellriggsiam 05:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Holes

message: Shouldn't the article's title be 'One If by Land' rather than 'One If By Land'? I'm opening a discussion before moving the page because I think title is very strange and I'm not sure if the 'By' is upper-cased for any particular reason. Siddharth Prabhu (talk) 10:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title Capitalization
Talk:Franco Alfano

message: On the Franco Alfano webpage under the category of ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, I see the following: "Fanfare Sept/Oct 98-99 gives the following information....."    Firstly, there's no such thing as Fanfare 98-99.  I checked my Sept/Oct. '98 Fanfare, and my Sept/Oct. '99 Fanfare, but I see nothing about Alfano, including anything on Page 103 of either issue.   Page 103 is indicated down below where the Symphonies are mentioned.  Could whoever wrote this article possibly contact me at forlino@ca.rr.com ?  I'd like to find the exact Fanfare issue!   I do have the CPO CD issue of Sym. #1 & 2 (Israel Yinon conducting), but this CD wasn't produced until 2005.
Paul Miller —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Forlino (talk • contribs) 06:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanfare citation? 

message: The relationship between Alfano and Mussolini is well documented in this thesis: 'Lyric Vocal Songs for the Salon of Franco Alfano' (Harrison, Florida State University, 2006) It could be added as a citation, but I am not sure how to do this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phillip210 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations with Mussolini 
Talk:Prince of Wales Theatre

message: I'm sceptical of the assertion in the "Cromie's theatre" section that the theatre's owner was fined for showing The Great Dictator in 1941, despite a source being cited. For one thing, the text implies that this was related to the film having been "banned in many parts of Europe". Yes... because much of Europe was occupied by the Nazis at the time! That would have zero relevance to the film's legal status in Britain. This needs, at the very least, further explanation and more sources, especially as in other places (not least The Great Dictator) here on Wikipedia, we're told that the film was often shown in the Battle of Britain, in 1940. How could that be if the film were banned a year later? Unflattering satires of Britain's wartime enemies would hardly seem the most likely target for a ban in the intervening year! Loganberry (Talk) 02:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Dictator 
Talk:Cabriolet

message: Is the picture a hansom cab or a cabriolet? --Gbleem 06:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Merging roadster et al for a centralised discussion around merging all the roadster-related articles. Zunaid©® 19:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging roadster et al
Talk:Yoiko (owarai)

message: Shinya Arino currently redirects to GameCenter CX. Should the redirect be changed to point to this article, since Yoiko existed first? SoledadKabocha (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinya Arino redirect 

message: I see where Yowiko is coming from, but that seems to be more of a literal verbal pronunciation than an actual translation, in the same vein of Famicom translating to "Famikon", which also isn't accurate. Google Translate's translation says Yoiko, as is the translation by numerous people doing fan subs of GCCX. Whoever manages this entry should change it back to Yoiko. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.203.44.105 (talk) 15:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it should really be moved back to "Yoiko" or "Yoiko (owarai)", arguably per WP:COMMONNAME. –Nameless(?) 18:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't it be Yoiko?
Talk:Diósjenő

message: This bit "There was a hero called Sir Lestyán.He was a knight, and an amateur rockstar, and he established the village." looks like vandalism, hoax, whatever.  Comments?
--James52 06:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Meppershall

message: Is the fact that black squirrels are seen in Meppershall notable? You can see them everywhere in this area.Plingsby (talk) 12:38, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Infobox Election Result

message: Good work on this. With the swings, we may be able to do an if statement kind of thing to automate the arrows, I'll mention it to one of my colleagues who knows parserfunctions inside out. Orderinchaos 06:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be great. Joestella 06:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrows 

message: Does this mean we can draw a line under the colour discussion and settle on the 7-based colours listed on /Info? I want to get on with replacing all the infoboxes I added in NSW, NT, Tasmania and the ACT. Joestella 07:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah - 6 was just a bit too dark. I checked the 7 on the uni's LCD monitors and it looks fine. At Western Australian state election, 2005 I can actually see the difference on my own monitor now - I guess it's a full 16 points out of 256 brighter. Orderinchaos 07:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I tried 9, and on a Mac it's so bright it gives the table a Play School feel. But having seen 6 on Windows, it just looks black. Glad we could sort this out. Joestella 07:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colour
Talk:Eagle Peak (Wyoming)

message: There is a fair amount of discrepancy between what the actual summit elevation is of many mountains in the U.S. In this case, the NPS says this peak is 11,358. The United States Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) says 11,352...USGS maps say 11,367 and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) says 11,372. The Peakbagger website tends to report USGS topographic map data as the official elevation but also lists the NAVD88 elevations and explains why they prefer the old topo map elevations. WikiProject Mountains may have a suggestion of which is the best source. For now, I simply added Peakbaggers USGS topo elevation.--MONGO 03:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The topoquest link you provided above uses the 1989 provisional USGS edition and shows the elevation as 11367 ft and specifically states 1983 NAD. The 1991 USGS Eagle Peak map doesn't give a peak elevation (just contours) and the 2012 US Topo does the same. The 1959 15 minute USGS map gives an elevation of 11358 ft using the 1927 NAD. The Peakbagger link shows the topo from the 1991 USGS map which doesn't show the specific peak elevation. The site also gives the NAVD88 elevation of 11,372 ft / 3466 m which the current US Topo is based on. Vsmith (talk) 14:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See my response at WikiProject Mountains. I think MONGO did the right thing. I updated the elevation to NAVD88, per Vsmith (and per what we've gradually been doing over the years). —hike395 (talk) 16:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the 11372 elevation to the article text to match the infobox...now based on NAVD88 data, probably the most accurate.--MONGO 16:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation
Talk:Lahpet

message: In the Cultivation section, we currently read, "Of this harvest, 69.5% becomes green tea, 19.5% becomes black tea and 20% becomes pickled tea." Those percentages add up to 110%. I checked the source and the mistake is copied from there. As there is no way of knowing what the correct breakdown should be, I'm removing the assertion for now. -- Ekaterina Colclough (talk) 10:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing erroneous sentence
Talk:5th Guards Tank Division

message: :Changed to stub class, does not have enough info.MilkStraw532 (talk) 18:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose to merge 37th Motor Rifle Brigade into 5th Guards Tank Division. They seem to be about the same Russian military unit, and the recent alleged mutiny incident is reported on both pages and the reason why the former was created. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 06:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the wrong way around. 5 GTD no longer exists, and has two different iterations with two separate lineages. The pages should stay separate. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

text: +1 --134.76.2.34 (talk) 10:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:South Australian Association of University College Clubs

message: There is a whole lot of information that is unnotable and not really of the stuff that wikipedia is made of on this page. Is it really necessary to include a table of the winners of each sport for the current year, AND include sports that aren't even part of the HTC? For example, I haven't even heard ANY talk of a Rugby 7's comp being 'trialled' in 2007 for possible inclusion in the HTC in subsequint years (and I'm a 5th Year at one of the Colleges in SAAUCC!). Aside from that, if you do decide to keep the table of winners, it may be better in a less confusing format. ABVS1936 06:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SAAUCC itself isnt even notable. Unlike its member colleges which are of note to a wide audience, this organisation is only notable to people within the colleges, and only for a few events per year at that.--Yeti Hunter 23:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, deletion? It seems the logical course. I mean, it probably does serve a purpose, if only from linking from the College pages and the Adelaide Uni page. Lets see how many people actually read this and comment before making any suggestions to the admins. ABVS1936 15:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Perhaps if SAAUCC could be better referenced, or if someone on SAAUCC could add some information, this article could be improved? Or, failing that, merged with NAAUC? ABVS1936 10:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: Or, merge. Almost the entire article is reproduced under Intercollegiate Sport at the Sport at the University of Adelaide page. Adding something along the lines of "SAAUCC is the governing body of this sporting competition" would pretty much cover it. The fact that SAAUCC also organises one pub crawl and one ball each year is hardly notable, especially since its member colleges organise many of these on their own each year.--Yeti Hunter 10:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps if SAAUCC could be better referenced, or if someone on SAAUCC could add some information, this article could be improved? Or, failing that, merged with NAAUC? ABVS1936 10:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Cabasa

message: Morning and happy birthday and I will be in touch with the last of us and I can come to the floor and we can do it 🤠and then we will get it to you tomorrow morning and I will be home by then ☺️you 😘me please let me please let me know what you need  please let the floor have a few days ago and on the last one I can do it 🤠and the office is not going on 😭days ago ☺️you and your mom are so beautiful  November on the 13 2603:7081:1B00:F9C6:A5F6:2E1B:246B:7C5B (talk) 22:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lilly  

message: On my way to work and I can come 😁you up and I will call him tomorrow and I can do the same for me please and thank I will be home in aboutpimoiwuqweieueieuwuejejjqweertytuuiioppaassddffghjjkkjkkkllbxzzzzxccvbnm!🌄n I will call him in the morning to work and I will call him in a few minutes and I will call him tomorrow and then we will be in the last minute and the just one of the last few weeks I will call you in a bit and a lot and we have a few more minutes and@@ 2603:7081:1B00:F9C6:A5F6:2E1B:246B:7C5B (talk) 22:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mom
Talk:Iron Will

message: The links that are in the article for both Albert Campbell, who won the 1917 race from Winnipeg to Saint Paul, and Fred Hartman go to people who were a in politics or baseball - neither of those links go to the Albert Campbell nor to the Fred Hartman described in the article. It is quite likely that those peoples' pages simply don't exist. Invmog (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to the Wrong People

message: This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (it does not meet the criteria of CSD A3) --  SchreiberBike | ⌨  01:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: I didn’t doing in sha Allah 🌸 183.171.87.81 (talk) 02:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  masturbation
Talk:Clean Slate (1994 film)

message: Per a request at WP:FILMS' assessment department, I have reviewed this article to determine if it qualifies as Start class. Looking over the article, it is almost there and just needs one more section of information (box office performance, home video release, production, etc.). Please look at the in the film banner above for instructions on how to improve this article by clicking on "show". Once you have met all of the requirements, let me know and I can reassess it or you can do it yourself. If you have any further questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:FILMS class assessment
Talk:Inspec

message: User:Jimfbleak you have redirected the page within 8 minutes after a stub was created. Please hang on to allow more information to be added in time. Thank you. Jmath666 07:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: INSPEC is also the name of a company formed by Jim Ratcliffe and John Hollowood in 1992. The Wikipedia article on Jim Ratcliffe and on INEOS both refer to it.
I don't know how to set up a disambiguation page for the term "INSPEC", but this needs to be done, urgently.Sayitclearly (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation required
Talk:Cople

message: "A toll house stands at the junction [of what?] with the A603" 
And some people aren't going to know who the Spencers are--even the Northamptonshire Spencers. --Oldontarian (talk) 19:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A toll house stands at the junction with the A603" 