Talk:Playing with Fire (Kevin Federline album)

message: I'm just wondering where people are getting the sales figures from. They're hilarious, if true. --User:Seizure Salad 23:02 January 6 2006 (UTC)
OOoooweee I can't wait for this album to drop.  It's gonna be FIRE!  --Glaze 18:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: he sold 1 album in 4th week? AWESOME :D
And where did his mom get the $17.95? Selling food stamps?
dude i was the one that bought it, wish i didn't do...really... hey wait just joking man, I think that sell was a typing mistake or something .. what tha flip dudes, I wrote -99 and someone deleted that and wrote .1 that's stupid, i'll erase it now I thought it was funny but I'll erase it inmediatly ... I don't really know the sales for the forth or fifth week so I'll leave it in zero...
:Wait a second you admit to buying that record? Doc Strange 14:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF? 

message: Can someone show proof of the number of copies sold and now apparently returned. 
i'm really curious where that info came from. 
if those are true, that's fuct and sad.
I think the statement 'no more copies are being produced' needs a proper citation (although I'm very sure it's true)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.36.234.233 (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart Numbers 

message: That has to be a joke...but I wouldn't doubt it. That vandalism would be more realistic if it wasn't for the 0.1 stat, but regardless, I think the 5000 returned CDs could be true if his sales take into account how many a store buys(kind of like xbox 360/ps3 sales) and then the store has the option of returning unpurchased CDs(on the two accounts that no one wants it and if they did, it's like 10 cents on amazon.com).
*giggle* Rx787 17:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  5000 returned 

message: Removed the line: "Federline admitted in a rather candid interview that the sheer crappiness of his album was caused by a combination of hastily-consumed big crunches as well as fat rails of blow off of male strippers' anal apertures."
This was the last line of the "Reception" section. It does not contribute to the article, cites no sources, is not worded in Wikipedia's standards of formality, and it's neutrality is quite non-existent.
We may all hate Kfed, but it doesn't mean we have to trash up Wikipedia with this silly, immature vandalism.
66.177.27.54 13:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Log. 

message: did this piece of crap album really reach number 2 in the U.S. Top Heatseekers chart? i doubt it. source? 90.207.158.100 (talk) 21:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: U.S. Top Heatseekers

message: Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the  template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
* http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Ajvfyxqudldse
--CactusBot (talk) 10:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011 

message: Substituted at 03:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment