lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vitality

message: If you would like to add different perspectives to this article, please do. I merely outlined the basic definition, and added one section to address the article which linked me to the blank page. I would assume someone would want to add a practical section as well.
::I have noticed one user repeatedly marking the page as 'unwikipedic' without siting any problems with it in the discussion page. Unless you're going to state what the problem is, do not keep adding this flag.
Akaroo 02:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: # As it stands, it could perfectly be edited and moved to wiktionary as a Computer Game term.
# There are no sources, no references, no links...
Hope these are reasons enought...
--Francisco Valverde|Francisco Valverde 14:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not wikipedian as it is
Talk:Joe Sestak

message: The article seems a bit deceptive by suggesting that Sestak being in a service academy during the Vietnam War was service.   In a sense it was, but he could easily have just joined the military and served in Vietnam.   Instead, he sat in safety as a student while millions of draftees fought the war.   Because only Democrats can edit Wikipedia, I wouldn't dream of making any change to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.216.213 (talk) 15:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: This article is too long for a Wikipedia WP:BLP page. There is much information that does not rise to the level of inclusion, per WP:NOTEVERYTHING standards. Interested editors are encouraged to review the article and make appropriate edits to cut back the length and dense detail of the article. Go4thProsper (talk) 16:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it too long? I don't think so. This article has a prose size (text only) of 40110 characters (6374 words) "readable prose size". Per WP:SIZESPLIT, 40k characters means "Length alone does not justify division". There certainly can be some things that may be better off removed per WP:RECENTISM, but size alone is not a problem here. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is too long
Talk:Lasalle's invariance principle

message: My opinion is that this should redirect to a wikipedia article entitled "Krasovskii-LaSalle principle" where the current content of this page ought to be. Reasons: "Krasovskii-LaSalle" is also accepted usage, see for example here. I'll admit that "LaSalle's principle" is used more often in English-language texts; this, however, is not the case once one considers Russian-language texts. Finally, Krasovskii came up with this before LaSalle, which is an undisputed fact. --Pierremenard 02:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?
Talk:Café Flesh

message: For some reason someone deleted the references to two notable actors who appeared in the film, one of whom was Richard Belzer of SVU fame. I've re-added this information. 68.146.8.46 14:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous actors

message: "An R-rated cut of the film was shown in mainstream theaters.[2]" -peary, cult movies 3
I am holding the book in front of me, 
"'Dream' and Stahl hoped that the picture would ultimately get an R rating. It never did, but when it played midnights all but one of the male orgasms were eventually eliminated, at their suggestion."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.94.145 (talk) 04:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  misquote? 

message: Surely someone has seen this and can give a plot synopsis...
Maybe a "reception" section?
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 04:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 
Talk:Discrete

message: Its something inbetween a content page a list of dictdefs and a disambiguation page. As such, it is pretty useless. 
We have to decide what this page should be, if you are willing to provide enough content to turn this into a contentpage I'm very happy. Markus Schmaus 02:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Process based industry should be explained when you provide examples for discrete industry.
Research & Development in a pharmaceutical vertical could be a good example of process methodology
where as automotive component industry could be a good example of discrete methodology  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.170.102 (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the opposite word to discrete? 

message: For example, what's the continuous analogue of "discrete function"? It's not a continuous function, because that's a specific property with a different meaning. Often "continuous-time" is used for this purpose. But the domain is not always time. A good compromise is "continuous-domain". A continuous-domain function. Unambiguous and immediately meaningful. (By the way, it is emphatically the role of encyclopaedians to disambiguate terminology from conflicting areas.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evgeni Sergeev (talk • contribs) 13:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposite to discrete: "continuous-domain"
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Melbourne/Streets

message: This section has the potential to attract numerous one paragraph stub articles.
Should we require a reason for including a particular street such as:
* The street is of historical or cultural interest
* Contains buildings of significance
* Local commercial/shopping strip
* It's the main street of a suburb
* A famous person lived there
* The street is of significant local interest
Eric. Cuddy Wifter 02:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusions

message: This is should be sorted under different suburbs so it is easier to find the street you want...--Adammw 09:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This List
Talk:Davie Allan

message: Hey, doesn't it seem like every paragraph except the first is a slam against this guy? - Two Halves
I removed Techunter's stuff about Allan's political "activism."  Forwarding missives to your email contact list does not qualify as political activism.  Also removed the throwaway paragraph on Allan's "sleeping and slandering."  I have the "Anthology '64-'68" Sundazed reissue--I'll greatly expand this page more based on the liner notes provided (they are extensive).  Justin Bailey 15:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: It looks like a grammatical error, but the name of the song really is "Blue's Theme" (not "Blues Theme"). In The Wild Angels, the main character is named "Blue". —Chowbok 19:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I just looked it up and the character is "Blues". So it's really "Blues' Theme" ("Blues's Theme" would also have been correct--Davie Allan apparently doesn't read Strunk & White). Correcting now. —Chowbok 19:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Blue's Theme

message: In the portion concerning Mr. Allan's legacy he is credited with developing the "fuzz" sound. Not to take away from Mr. Allan's contributions (I was a big fan) I believe this is a bit overstated. (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction predates Blues' Theme by just over a year (6 June 1965) and is one of the first "popular" songs to feature the fuzz guitar sound (created by the Gibson Maestro Fuzz Tone fuzz box). This contention is supported by Tom Hughes' in his excellent book "Analog Man's Guide to Vintage Effects". While I'm not certain which box Davie might have used - could have been the Gibson unit or possibly the Mosrite Fuzzrite or one of many other possibilities - he was not the first to do so. Certainly a contributor, but I would argue not the developer. Any thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Added what I think is appropriate detail on Allan's usage of the fuzz box to address the concerns mentioned above. He did indeed take the effects usage to a different level and deserves credit for this aspect.THX1136 (talk) 15:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy question(s)
Template talk:Infobox figure skater

message: I think I only started looking into this template when I found no space to indicate Michelle Kwan's marriage (later dissolved) to Clay Pell — since the templates for other individual athletes often do include such an optional parameter. Should this be added or restored? —— Shakescene (talk) 02:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a spouse parameter until now, but it was decided by majority vote to remove it from the template, since it's rare that skaters get married to encyclopedically notable people, and it just further blows up the infobox in length. Spouses should be mentioned in the prose part of the article in the section "private life", supported by reliable secondary sources. Henni147 (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage? 

message: Description of suggested change:
Based on the latest decisions on WikiProject Figure Skating, the following template changes have been requested:
*The current_WS parameter shall be removed. 
*All parameters for ISU personal best scores shall be removed. 
*The parameter medalrecord shall be added with the header "Medal record". 
The sandbox has been adjusted already and the new markup code checked for functionality with two testcases. Thank you very much in advance! Henni147 (talk) 10:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 14:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. The updated template works flawlessly. Thank you very much! Henni147 (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy to help! Paine  15:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 12 October 2023
Talk:Rhonda Vincent

message: I've changed Rhonda's hometown in the infobox from Kirksville to Greentop, Missouri. She was born in a Kirksville hospital, but grew up in the Greentop - Queen City area. Her parents still live in Greentop, and there is also a large highway signboard proclaiming it as her hometown. It shouldn't be a big deal since the towns are only 9 miles apart and Greentop is sort of a "bedroom community" of Kirksville....just trying to keep things accurate. Sector001 (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hometown 

message: Hi Bailey Goodman (talk) 04:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing much
Talk:Brokeback Mountain/Archive 3

message: imdb says 50.8 million.  I went to the site of the quote and it's dated today.  Is she talking out of her hat?  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: $50 million + is correct.  I just realized  you were talking about an old quote on the main page.  You're right that the quote should be dated because at the time the quote was uttered, $25 was</S> might have been the correct figure, but isn't any longer. EDIT: I just re-read your comment.  Really?? That $25 mln comment has been on the page a while.  It's hard for me to understand how it could be "dated today." Moncrief 22:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, sorry.  When I clicked on the link, the date at the top of the page says January 30, but the article itself says January 17. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added this: This assertion was made on January 17.  By January 30, Imdb was reporting gross sales of over $50 million..  I have no problem if somebody wants to reword that.  User:Zoe|(talk) 22:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, well, I see somebody removed it without explanation.  User:Zoe|(talk) 18:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "$25 million in ticket sales"
Talk:Pinks (TV series)

message: The reason I cam to this wikipedia article was to know why the show is called Pinks. I have never seen this show, nor heard of it, and nothing in the article tells me why it is called Pinks. Can somebody please add this info?
130.76.32.19 (talk) 17:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of Show

message: He's not, nor was he ever, a soap opera actor.  He appeared in 1, once only, briefly.  I've removed that statement. --Bdoserror 05:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christensen not a soap actor 

message: I'm on the production team for this show - I've seen the winner of one of the races drive away with the loser's vehicle in tow.  There is no fabrication in the catch phrase "Lose the race, lose your ride."  I suppose that in some instances the losing team might offer a worthy enough sum to buy back their vehicle, but the initial handover of the pink slip is non-negotiable; any side deals that are made are made off-camera, away from the race track, and outside of public scrutiny.  Salva 16:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Skepticism on Validity of Post-Race Submission of Pink Slip/Vehicle 

message: Why isn't there anything about the host crashing the Gixxer? Much of the show is based around the don't-take-no-guff attitude of the host, and pretending to know how to ride a motorcycle definitely goes against his credibility with the audience. See http://bikerpunks.com/videos/the-host-of-pinks-crashes-a-gsx-r1000.htmlAgnamus (talk) 03:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Host's demeanor 

message: The overall neutrality of the article seems suspect, but particularly those comments regarding the show's host.  I have absolutely no knowledge of the host or his background--haven't even heard his name prior to reading this article--but whomever made these statements is dangerously close to providing a direct attack without anything to back it up.  Considering the fact that this is a living person, that the motives for his behavior on the show are intrinsically unknowable, and the fact that the host's personality is secondary to the main concept of the show (and therefore the article), I would argue that there's really no reason to have these comments included in the article.  I strongly recommend a rewrite of the entire section dealing with the host.  --Bdmccray (talk) 07:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Be BOLD and try rewriting it yourself. -Drdisque (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Issues regarding host 

message: "Pinks is a franchise series of television programs on Speed Channel based on illegal street racing," Definitely changing this. If there was anything illegal about Pinks they wouldn't be able to air it on television.  (talk) 23:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illegal?
Talk:Ida Tarbell

message: I am currently expanding Ida Tarbell's article and would be most grateful for extra eyes on edits. Jaldous1 (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now finished research and am ready to have this article reviewed! --Auldhouse (talk) 00:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Redoing citations to Harvard Reference. --Auldhouse (talk) 21:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent writing and content. The only flaw is that it gives opinions in Wikipedia's voice which should be attributed to the authors you cite. That's a very strong Wikipedia policy. WP:NPOV WP:WP:RS. You could easily solve that problem by inserting, "According to _______" everywhere. --Nbauman (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Work to Expand and Raise Article
Talk:Gulen

message: The number of farms (135) mentioned in the article are not the real number. 135 are the number of farm names, but for every farm name there can be an number of actual farms.	
btw should not the above text be removed. It has nothing to do with this article. Ovesen (talk) 21:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farms 
Talk:Igor Bunich

message: In seinem Buch "Operazija Grosa", Moskau 2004 (Jausa), giebt Bunic den Text eines von ihm entdeckten Dokuments wieder, das den Plan für einen Großangriff auf ganz Westeuropa enthält. Das Dokument befindet sich in der "Osobaja Papka", der Handacte Stalins, trägt die Unterschriften von Marschall Timoschenko und vom Chef des Generalstabes Merezkov, der übrigens diesen von ihm selbst mitverfaßten Plan später an die Wehrmacht verrieth,sowie die Nummer 103202/06 und ist datiert mit 18. September 1940, ist also 3 Monate früher als die Direktive Barbarossa entstanden.Daß dies nicht nur ein belangloses Gedankenspiel war, beweist, so Bunic, daß schon am 17. November 1940 im obersten Generalstab und danach in den einzelnen Wehrkreisen mit Kriegsspielen begonnen wurde, in denen der Plan durchgespielt wurde. Nach der Ernennung von Schukow zum Chef des Generalstabes im februar 1941 wurde der Plan MP 41 genannt: Mobilisazjonnij Plan 41. Bunic giebt die fundstelle dafür an: ZAMO, f. 15A,op.2154, d. 4, 1. l. 199-287. In diesem Dokument ist auch der Stand der sowietischen rüstung kurz vor dem einmarsch der Wehrmacht angegeben: 300 Divisionen, 8 Millionen soldaten, 27500 Panzer, 32628 Flugzeuge: Ergebnis einer in der Weltgeschichte einmaligen Aufrüstung!
Bunic geht es nicht um eine Reinwaschung Hitlers, sein Leitmotiv ist vielmehr die Frage, wer für die gigantischen Menschenversluste Rußlands im zweiten Weltkrieg verantwortlich ist. Wie es überhaupt zu solch einer Katastrophe kommen konnte. Er hat ein Dokument entdeckt, daß besagt, daß Rußland im zweiten Weltkrieg 30,5 Millionen Soldaten verloren hat. 8,5 wurden direct im Kampf getödtet, 22 erlagen ihren Verletzungen, von letzteren die Hälfte einer Tetanus-Infection.
Moved to here the text in German which was re-submitted by  on 9 Feb 2006 - Introvert ~? 03:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment: "Operazija Grosa"

message: Here is the original text of the dokumnet  103202
I din't find it in english, so if you want to check if I'm lying, fing translator or find full text in english (or whatever language you know...):
This is not a plan of aggression. 103202 has plans for offence BUT after aggression from Germany or Japan. No plans for aggression against Germany.  —Preceding unsigned  22:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment: "Operazija 'misinform' "

message: The Russian wiki lists him as died in 2000 but I can't find any articles or anything that references it. Williamb (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bunin's death
Talk:Nora Fontaine Davidson

message: This began as a brief article in WP format. Since then, a lot more information has been added with sources provided, but is apparently brought over verbatim, which we cannot allow in WP. (As it is now, it could be a copyright violation or two). 
Her story is an inspiring one, and needs proper presentation in Wikipedia, I believe. With this raw material and sources (and maybe some new ones), this article needs to be re-written and references cited as appropriate to Wikipedia style and standards. 
I am busy with other projects, but would be glad to advise anyone who wants to take this on, if I can be helpful. Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia Vaoverland 03:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help needed!
Talk:A Passionate Pilgrim

message: How different are the 1871 and 1908 versions of this tale?  Is it just in organization (Two parts and Four parts) or is their significant variety in the test?--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 03:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Zivania

message: Zivania is a distillate, not a wine. The category was changed to reflect reality. 
Regards Minatsu
By the same token, spirits belong more in the main Food & Drink Project rather than the Wine one, although I agree it's a bit of a judgement call in this case. But if you look at the WP charter, there's no mention of spirits, and F&D covers it perfectly well.
I thought that adding it to the Cyprus Project would be uncontroversial though :-)  FlagSteward 20:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discuss before/after changing, please

message: Expanded the article. Need to add some photos. Photo of Zivania added. Thanks to the Italian contributor Maxx1972 for the photo!
--Minatsu 13:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Photos

message: I understand that, although produced widely in the villages, zivania distillation was forbidden under British rule and in the first years of the Republic. I believe this may have been because the presence of grape stalks in the marc caused toxic methanol to be co-distilled. Certainly, in the 1950s, it was not on sale in shops. Perhaps this could be confirmed and mentioned in the article.
Devilinhell (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Thomson's gazelle

message: The article frequently calls this Thomson's Gazelle, lowercase. NickelShoe 03:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the way it should be. Thomson is a proper noun, so it must be written with a capital letter, however, the word gazelle should be written in lower case; it isn't a proper noun - there are many gazelles out there.--71.190.88.161 (talk) 02:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: The gazelle of thomson is one of smaller gazelles, adults she can run very fast up to 37 to 43 mph (60 to 70 km/h) generally, maximum 47 mph (76 km/h) for the most male fastest, and it makes jumps from 1 meter to 1.50 meters high (3,5 to 4,5 feet) and up to 2 meters (6,5 feet) max at most sometimes and 5 for 6 meters (17 to 20 feet) lenght. I am an expert and a fan of the animals of quite sorts, but in particular the gazelles and the antelopes. --Angel310 (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Performances

message: The above statement in the opening paragraph seems to contradict the information in the article Fastest animals, which specifically states the Tommy is build for endurance over speed.  I see it is sourced but found nothing in the source apart from a speed (60 mph) which is different from that stated in the opening paragraph. Which is correct?   Cavalryman V31 (talk) 12:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second fastest animal on earth 

message: Inconsistency. Decline from 1978 to 2005 referenced by 1999 book. Replace the source to IUCN.--Vicpeters (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decline
Talk:Guerilla Rodeo

message: What label signed them?
Most likely 5 Minute Walk. - STAREYe 12:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at their EP last weekend, it has no indication at all. I remember it was sold through Zambooie, and they don't carry Roper, so its probably not 5 Minute Walk. Not that they wouldnt have signed them though. Dan, the CowMan 23:26, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Federico Krutwig

message: :Garaldea (land of "we are" or land of the flame)
From memory, Krutwig meant "Land of colour", "Land of the painted ones" or "Highland".
Actually I think the meant all at the same time.
--Error 03:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was when talking about Caledonians/Picts as Karadunak. Kara=color, laughter (archaic), also *khar is accepted as a pre-IE root for stone (like in Basque harri or German?karst).
He believed that Pict(us) was the Latin literal translation of Caledon/Karadun. --Sugaar 21:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Garaldea

message: I'm pretty sure that the second surname of Krutwig was Sagredo, not Salcedo. I'm changing that. If you can document the opposite please revert. --Sugaar 11:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  F. Krutwig SAGREDO!
Talk:Online creation/Archive 1

message: I truly believe online building is not the same as online creation, was developed seperately, even though Online Creation's modal features were later included in implementions of SMAUG.  Online building is an obvious bad hack.  -Locke
:Alrighty then.  We only really need one "online building/creation" article with a generic term to cover all angles (OLC, OLB, MUSHs, etc), of which OLC would be a subsection.  --Thoric 22:35, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online Creation is not Online Building