Talk:Charlie Gasparino

message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dq428cqNZbM
I know that it's not important to mention everything that person says, but this sounds big to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voyager2378 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be in the article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Charlie Gasparino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100310234001/http://www.foxbusiness.com:80/bios/talent/charles-gasparino/ to http://www.foxbusiness.com/bios/talent/charles-gasparino/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711145956/http://sf.hauteliving.com/celebrity-city-guide/?id=175 to http://sf.hauteliving.com/celebrity-city-guide/?id=175
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090420103610/http://www.mediabistro.com:80/tvnewser/cnbc/wheres_charlie_gasparino_114128.asp to http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnbc/wheres_charlie_gasparino_114128.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100313131627/http://www.foxbusiness.com:80/story/markets/industries/finance/regulators-honing-size-bofa/ to http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/regulators-honing-size-bofa/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100312052707/http://www.foxbusiness.com:80/story/markets/industries/finance/government-soon-ease-citi-stake/ to http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/government-soon-ease-citi-stake/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100611082532/http://www.mediabistro.com:80/tvnewser/generalities/as_cnbc_interviews_morgan_stanley_chairman_fbns_gasparino_breaks_news_on_the_company_163833.asp to http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/generalities/as_cnbc_interviews_morgan_stanley_chairman_fbns_gasparino_breaks_news_on_the_company_163833.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100329153043/http://www.foxbusiness.com:80/topics/charles-gasparino.htm to http://www.foxbusiness.com/topics/charles-gasparino.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100310234001/http://www.foxbusiness.com:80/bios/talent/charles-gasparino/ to http://www.foxbusiness.com/bios/talent/charles-gasparino/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Mr. Gasparino is edit warring, repeatedly removing a well-sourced discussion of his false claim to have been nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.
As the material removed makes plain: In 2012, Gasparino was touted as a "Pulitzer prize nominee" in his bio from Fox Business, which said he was "nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in beat reporting" in 1992, when he was a reporter for The Wall Street Journal. The same claim was made by his agents at the HarperCollins Speakers Bureau, and on the website of his publisher, Simon and Schuster. In a promotional video in 2008 for CNBC, his former employer, Gasparino declared, "I am: a writer, son of an ironworker, son of New York, Golden Gloves prospect, a Pulitzer Prize nominee..." This was a misleading claim, as pointed out by NBC News reporter Bill Dedman, because Gasparino had in fact only been one of hundreds of entrants in the Pulitzer contest and had never been nominated as a finalist, as the moniker "Pulitzer nominee" suggested.http://www.msnbc.com/your-business/also-not-pulitzer-prize-nominee-charlhttps://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/06/fox-business-charles-gasparino-todays-fake-pulitzer-prize-nominee/326505/https://www.businessinsider.com/charlie-gasparino-pulitzer-prize-nomination-2012-6 Becoming an entrant in the Pulitzer contest requires only that either the author of a written work submit an entry form along with a small fee or that someone else does so on their behalf. Nominees, called nominated finalists, are chosen by Pulitzer juries. The Pulitzer Prizes warn entrants against claiming to be nominees: "Nominated Finalists are selected by the Nominating Juries for each category as finalists in the competition. The Pulitzer Prize Board generally selects the Pulitzer Prize Winners from the three nominated finalists in each category. The names of nominated finalists have been announced only since 1980. Work that has been submitted for Prize consideration but not chosen as either a nominated finalist or a winner is termed an entry or submission. No information on entrants is provided. Since 1980, when we began to announce nominated finalists, we have used the term 'nominee' for entrants who became finalists. We discourage someone saying he or she was 'nominated' for a Pulitzer simply because an entry was sent to us.https://www.pulitzer.org/page/frequently-asked-questions Following Dedman's reporting, Gasparino at first responded, "I was nominated by the wsj sir," despite the fact that the Pulitzer juries, not news organizations, make the nominations. Later that day, Fox changed its online bio of Gasparino, saying that his work "was submitted for the Pulitzer."http://www.msnbc.com/your-business/also-not-pulitzer-prize-nominee-charl. As of 2019, the false claim remains on Gasparino's biography on the HarperCollins speakers' bureau.https://www.harpercollinsspeakersbureau.com/speaker/charles-gasparino/
The warning from the Pulitzer Prizes trustees make it clear: The only people who can claim to be nominees, or nominated, or finalists, are those chosen by the Pulitzer juries as nominees. This is the same as the Academy Awards, the Grammys, etc. People such as Mr. Gasparino are entrants. To claim to be a nominee, when one is only an entrant, is fraud, especially after it has already been pointed out, and his publisher has removed the claim from its website bio of him, etc.Extremely hot (talk) 22:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cut the length of the section in half. Still not sure what to do about Mr. Gasparino editing his own bio with puppets.Extremely hot (talk) 00:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  . Ultimately, these are decent ok references, and there are several of them, so the issue is probably of note.  However, in the context of a moderate-sized BLP, I think this should be written down to just two lines (max) and potentially not deserving of a whole sub-section; I don't think this 2012 issue became a material event in his career, and I have some sympathy with the attempts by (possibly) the subject to delete the current versions of it. Britishfinance (talk) 15:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the suggestion. I've cut the length down further.Extremely hot (talk) 18:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pulitzer claim controversy