lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of canals in Canada

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. No valid rationale. No participants. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: List of canals of Canada →  – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 112.200.9.88 (talk) 12:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 August 2022
Talk:Snark

message: Okay, guys, this is getting silly. Please discuss your differences here on the talk page instead of reverting each other. If you keep it up, I'll have to protect the page. - Eureka Lott 21:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: Recently I've been coming across the term Snark a lot, this guy Denby even wrote a book on the subject.  All kinds of critics say that Denby misunderstood what Snark actually is.  So I go to wikipedia for clarification: but there is no article on Snark.  I think Snark is notable enough to warrant a wikipedia article.  If I had a clue what Snark was, I'd start it myself.--198.129.67.74 (talk) 23:37, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a page for the modern meaning of Snark? 

message: Snark the British morris rapper team.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.62.197 (talk) 02:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rapper Team 

message: Can someone tell me why snark being a contraction of snide remark was removed? I was going to add it, but checked the history, and saw that it was added, then removed by another user. That was the definition I was looking for on Wikipedia. lenny (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it is an encyclopedia. This page in particular is a disamb page. Its sole purpose is to link to existing articles you might be looking for. The information you were looking for can be found by clicking the link to the Wikitionary page at the top. (Incidentally, the etymology at Wikitionary seems to indicate "Snark" is not a contraction of "snide remark".) - SummerPhD (talk) 04:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snide Remark
Talk:Red Line Agreement

message: Most of the history display in the entry thus far seems to be fable and error. The details are in Banking on Baghdad, but I do not have time to make any fixes. I did however, add the book and website to the Sources.
: I disagree, I have checked all the facts and the Wiki article is absolutely fine. 5439l0ckHo1m35 (talk) 06:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Consider using https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/red-line. It's public domain.
also I'd add this external link https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/Petroleum/redline.htm  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiigb (talk • contribs) 21:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification and contextualization is needed 
Talk:Minister of External Relations (Angola)

message: I disagree with the move. The official title of the position is minister of external relations (see page sources) and it is wrong to change it otherwise. Would you call Condoleeza Rice the foreign minister of the USA? or David Miliband in the UK? You really should discuss such moves before doing them.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a translation from the original Portuguese. "External relations" may be a literal translation, but "foreign" is also acceptable. Jose João (talk) 23:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Our American Cousin

message: Half of this "article" is about the Lincoln Assassination, not about the play. Obviously it merits mentioning in passing, but not half the article. Typical wikiality, using gamed google rankings to steal website hits away from other quality sites. -- 21:45, 21 January 2008 86.149.142.91
:The play is now mostly remembered for the Licoln connection (obviously). AnonMoos (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Had Lincoln not been assassinated during a performance of this play, I wonder if it would even have an entry at all. I would be interested if this play is still permormed anymore.--RLent (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Considering the Lincoln article states it was already famous before he was assassinated it probly would be notable if he hadnt been but we can never know i guess--69.146.146.25 (talk) 04:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.tvsquad.com/2006/11/13/family-guy-whistle-while-your-wife-works/ is the family guy citation  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.20.107 (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Garbage

message: According to http://boothiebarn.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/the-assassination-playbills/, citing two published sources, the playbill depicted in the photo is at best a reproduction or at worst a forgery. I have updated the caption accordingly. 98.213.192.103 (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playbill photo 

message: In the ad for this play at Ford's Theater in the Washington Evening Star of April 14, 1865, page 1, which you can see here, the title given is "The American Cousin". deisenbe (talk) 12:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Under "Popular Culture", I'm removing the following sentence: "In the 1961 Twilight Zone episode Back There, the star tries to stop the assassination of Lincoln who is attending this play that night."   In that episode, the person who tries to stop the assassination is a time traveler from the present, not the star of the play.  (If "star" was meant to describe the star of the TZ episode, instead of the play, it still doesn't belong IMO.  The episode doesn't deal specifically with the play itself.  The TZ reference properly belongs on the Lincoln assassination page, if it's not already there.)  Elsquared (talk) 08:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twilight Zone sentence removed
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Wisdom89 2

message: User:Wisdom89
    run at Mon Jan 21 21:45:20 2008 GMT
Category:              1
Image:                 15
Mainspace              2789
Portal:                15
Talk:                  260
User talk:             745
User:                  119
Wikipedia:             418
avg edits per page     4.49
earliest               19:40, 7 September 2004
number of unique pages 971
total                  4362
2004/9   1
2004/10  0
2004/11  0
2004/12  0
2005/1   0
2005/2   0
2005/3   0
2005/4   0
2005/5   0
2005/6   0
2005/7   0
2005/8   0
2005/9   0
2005/10  0
2005/11  0
2005/12  1
2006/1   13
2006/2   39
2006/3   165
2006/4   165
2006/5   135
2006/6   137
2006/7   90
2006/8   127
2006/9   86
2006/10  63
2006/11  43
2006/12  133
2007/1   76
2007/2   57
2007/3   79
2007/4   37
2007/5   24
2007/6   119
2007/7   112
2007/8   157
2007/9   251
2007/10  722
2007/11  516
2007/12  426
2008/1   588
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
         Mainspace
689 Rush (band)
189 Blink-182
181 Neil Peart
118 Conservapedia
96  Smallville (TV series)
80  Snakes & Arrows
74  Yoda
70  Phospholipase C
59  Geddy Lee
53  Speed metal
40  Dream Theater
37  Alex Lifeson
37  Gregory House
34  Children of Bodom
33  Mace Windu
             Talk:
84 Rush (band)
34 Conservapedia
14 Smallville (TV series)
14 House (TV series)
13 Children of Bodom
12 Speed metal
8  Neil Peart
8  Blink-182
7  The Bourne Ultimatum (film)
7  Gregory House
6  Yoda
4  Geddy Lee
4  Stony Brook University
3  George W. Bush
3  Xanadu (song)
       Image:
3 Aerial jordan.jpg
2 Vm-map.png
2 Highwaymen2.jpg
                     Portal:
6 Rush (band)/Rush (band) news
2 Molecular and Cellular Biology/Selected article
2 Rush (band)/Did you know
2 Zelda/Did you know
         User:
98 Wisdom89
6  Wisdom89/monobook.js
3  75.1.6.218
3  75.3.126.232
2  Metnever
2  75.1.244.104
       User talk:
41 Widoms89/Archive 1
35 Wisdom89
11 70.68.179.142
6  Dyertrini
6  75.2.216.91
5  75.1.244.104
5  BorgHunter/Archive 4
5  Bencampo
4  24.236.139.131
4  128.175.219.181
4  InfodivaDF
4  Gkleinman
4  74.135.20.224
4  70.48.213.10
4  Siva1979
                          Wikipedia:
125 Usernames for administrator attention
83  Administrator intervention against vandalism
30  Requests for adminship/Wisdom89
10  Featured article candidates/Rush (band)
6   Suspected sock puppets/71.156.47.81
5   Articles for deletion/Field High School
5   Articles for deletion/Phosphoinositide phospholipase C
4   Featured article candidates/The Smashing Pumpkins/archive1
4   Requests for adminship/Kizor
4   Requests for adminship/Wisdom89 2
4   Articles for deletion/CIPFG
3   Suspected sock puppets/Laughing Joker
3   Articles for deletion/Teen punk
3   Articles for deletion/ANTAGEN
3   Featured article candidates/Jang Yeong-sil
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 21:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Wisdom89
Talk:Edward Jones

message: I believe Edward Lloyd Jones should remain and not be merged with Edward Jones as although both father and son listed on it have the surname Jones they are always referred to as Edward Lloyd Jones as if Lloyd Jones was the surname. I doubt that anyone would look for them under Edward Jones. In fact later generations of the family have in fact become Lloyd-Jones. Castlemate (talk) 11:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion, Edward Lloyd Jones dab into here

message: A requested move has been ongoing for over a month at Talk:Edward D. Jones, and might benefit from additional participation. Wbm1058 (talk) 21:46, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of requested move discussion
Talk:Nephelauxetic effect

message: I believe the ligand order is incorrect. F- should have the smallest Neph. effect, i.e. the biggest β. The sequence refers to 1-β.
80.42.60.44 (talk) 13:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - I've changed it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.46.245 (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Austin Cambridge

message: I thought that the A40 design was by a different Italian, one Battista Farina , no relation Brunnian (talk) 21:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pininfarina? 
Talk:Austin A40 Devon

message: The tourer was an Australia-only product and I suspect the pick-up was too. Eddaido (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourer and pick-up 
Talk:Austin Kimberley

message: The Kimberley had air bag suspension. Enough said. My new '73 Kimberley Mk2 cured me of British cars. (My Lancer only caught fire once, so I was lucky there.) Been with Japanese cars ever since. 220.244.78.226 (talk) 23:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemon?
Talk:1993 Buffalo Bills season

message: More details needs to be added to the infobox section under Super Bowl XXVII but at least the box score is there as it was with the three previous Bills Super Bowl seasons. Hopefully someone else can help with this task. - Notcharliechaplin (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox on Super Bowl XXVII was missing so partially fixed it.
Talk:Ardchattan and Muckairn

message: This template, which the article contains, was redircted to one which underwent substantial editing. After a discussion, it was realised that the edited template referred to civil parishes only, and that, since such things were laregly redundant in Scotland, the name of it should be changed to Template:Infobox England and Wales civil parish. This was done, but it leaves this transclusion here in an uncertain state. I've commented it out so that people can decide whether it is a civil parish, as opposed to an ecclesiastical parish, and also so they can decide what to do with it.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacement of "Template:UK Parish" redirection
Talk:School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University

message: Hello everyone, this is Roc--Openthedoors( Geodesy 2003, sggwhu) (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wuhan Technical Universtiy of Surveying and Mapping. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#Wuhan Technical Universtiy of Surveying and Mapping until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 22:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wuhan Technical Universtiy of Surveying and Mapping" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kilmadock

message: This template, which the article contains, was redircted to one which underwent substantial editing. After a discussion, it was realised that the edited template referred to civil parishes only, and that, since such things were laregly redundant in Scotland, the name of it should be changed to Template:Infobox England and Wales civil parish. This was done, but it leaves this transclusion here in an uncertain state. I've commented it out so that people can decide whether it is a civil parish, as opposed to an ecclesiastical parish, and also so they can decide what to do with it.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacement of "Template:UK Parish" redirection
Talk:Unwarranted variation

message: Given that the article is explicitly about the concept of unwarranted variation in healthcare, I wondered if the title of the article should explicitly reflect that - ie be Unwarranted Variation (Healthcare).
I know the brackets are usually used for 'not to be confused with' concepts - but it would seem to make sense to be clear from the get go on this particularly as the words themselves aren't subject specific.  
What do others think?
Jpmaytum (talk) 09:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League/Kansas City Chiefs subproject

message: I created this for all users and members of the Kansas City Chiefs subproject to put on their user pages.conman33 (. . .talk) 22:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I'll see if I can find more people that are interested. RC-0722 (talk) 23:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: User box

message: I was looking to have one of our articles nominated for "good article" status. Here's a list that I thought were some of the best (so far). Of course, they might need to be spiced up a bit more:
*2007 Kansas City Chiefs season - might have to re-work the game summaries, but otherwise, I think it's perfect.
*History of the Kansas City Chiefs - too many uses of references, possibly, but otherwise, I think it's very thorough.
*Chiefs-Raiders rivalry - maybe work on the history/background a bit more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conman33 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just nominated Brodie Croyle. conman33 (. . .talk) 00:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool. RC-0722 (talk) 00:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article candidate possibilities

message: Passed GA nomination on March 6, 2008. conman33 (. . .talk) 04:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brodie Croyle

message: Passed GA nomination on March 26, 2008. conman33 (. . .talk) 03:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Joe Delaney

message: I am honored to be among you to work on this historic project. Thank you very much for inviting me to work on this. --Chris Bradley (talk) 07:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for the Invite
Talk:Ferrari America

message: Why does 375MM redirect here?  This page is about the road cars.  Where is the page about the competition cars? Jpg1954 (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  375MM Racing cars 

message: I vote to delate: 375MM bergmann coupe as its not based on 375 America but on 375 MMYBSOne (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, with a bit of free time, there should be a 375 MM page, or maybe 166/250/340/375 MM? YBSOne (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion of sections
Talk:Fernando Otero

message: I have recently discovered this musician and came to Wikipedia to find more about him, and was disappointed that there was nothing, given that he is releasing music with a serious record label (Nonesuch Records), and is attracting mainstream media attention in Britain at least, for example, http://arts.guardian.co.uk/filmandmusic/story/0,,2238759,00.html, and BBC radio.  I know the article is thin, but I have been trying to find more information on him, which I will add when I find it - I've done this in the past.  I'd like to stress I have no personal connection with Fernando Otero, as I know some people are given to starting articles in order to push their own agenda.
Looking at Wikipedia:Notability (music), I thought he qualified under Criteria for musicians and ensembles "5: Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).", but then I see he has only released 1 CD with Nonesuch, so if it comes to it, I can't complain if you go ahead and delete  Gwaka Lumpa (talk) 22:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what you've written here, I'm removing the speedy deletion tag.  However, please make the article better, or find help from other Wikipedians to do so, otherwise the article, as it is now, will likely be deleted in the near future.  If you need help, I'm sure there is a WikiProject that can help you.  Please let me know if I can be of further assistance!  Keeper  |  76 23:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I am trying to find some more information on him Gwaka Lumpa (talk) 23:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Louie Provenza

message: There seems to be a persistent belief that Provenza's first name is Salvatore.  In actuality, to date, Provenza has no first name.  As recently as the current season, we saw his business card listing his name as Detective Lt. Provenza, with no first name.  Moreover, his listing on the TNT website includes no first name, and the TNT press releases for each episode identify him solely as Det. Lt. Proveza in the cast list.  I'm not sure where anyone is getting Sal from, since there's no reference attached, but as an unverifiable name, it does not belong on the page.  
It should also be noted that until the end of Summer Series 3, Commander Taylor had no first name until it was finally seen as Brenda watched him on television, speaking to reporters.  Producer James Duff has made a game of slowly revealing characters' first names.  For anyone familiar with British police procedurals, Duff has drawn some inspiration for his characters from two notable series: Inspector Morse and Prime Suspect.  Provenza has several Morse-like characteristics:  white hair, fussy quirks, a curmudgeonly personality, a seemingly lazy approach that hides brilliance, and no first name.  Drmargi (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provenza's First Name 
Talk:Actimetry

message: IMO, Actigraph should be merged into Actigraphy, with Actigraph redirecting to Actigraphy.  Then Actimetry should redirect to Actigraphy as well.
Actigraphy is the term used in the US, see:   http://www.aasmnet.org/Resources/PracticeParameters/PP_Actigraphy_Circ.pdf , while it's possible that actimetry is used in Canada(?). 
Actigraphy is the process, similar to Polysomnography; polysomnograph redirects to polysomnography.  Explanations / descriptions of the process, its reasons and uses, and the device used all fit nicely within an article entitled Actigraphy. --Hordaland (talk) 23:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging
Talk:List of Tiny Toon Adventures episodes

message: Why is the table colored in some spots but not others? There's no explanation of this, and color tables are generally discouraged. I'm removing it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color 

message: The Specials are numbered 99 and 100 respectively: is there any source for that? Cordially, Twipley (talk) 03:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special-Episodes Numbering 

message: on the tiny toons episode "The Wide World of Elmyra at the sean when the baby almost has a drink a white curcal with Babs and Buster Bunny in it
: Huh? Trivialist (talk) 20:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  interrupt the show
Talk:Blue Chip Cookies

message: This article needs a better (preferably freely-licensed) photo of a Blue Chip Cookies store. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 23:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:USB types 2.jpg

message: The leftmost connector is not micro usb - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Universal_Serial_Bus 85.156.235.161 (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i think it's a micro-USB. If i'm not mistaken, the micro-USB shown here is used by Nokia for their new smartphone series, and the phone's specs says micro-USB.andry (talk) 14:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Correct, it is NOT a standard micro-B plug.  See this discussion section I have started on it.  ǝɹʎℲxoɯ (contrib) 21:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Chione (daughter of Daedalion)

message: "Hermes put her to sleep and raped her. She became pregnant with twins, one (Autolycus) the son of Hermes, and the other (Philammon), the son of Apollo."
If details about Hermes raping Chione are given, there should also be details for Apollo. I don't understand the reason for this lack of information.
ICE77 (talk) 00:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details missing
Talk:Super two

message: The change was from "high standards" to "highway standards" in the first paragraph, which turned a reasonably coherent article into meaningless gibberish and made the article redundant vis-a-vis the existing article on highways. User:Glenn L appears to be ignorant of how different types of highways are classified. 
A highway is not necessarily a super two.  The point of a "super two" classification is that the term refers to a highway built to fairly high standards that come close to but do not quite meet standards for a controlled-access highway because the highway only has two lanes, one in each direction.  For example, Interstate 93 is a "super two" and not a regular Interstate Highway because it has only two lanes and an Interstate Highway is supposed to have a minimum of four lanes, two in each direction.  
An example of one definition of "super two" can be found here. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow... this was nearly nine YEARS ago. If you want to fix my very old edit, you are free to do so. —Glenn L (talk) 05:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing to fix bad edit by [[User:Glenn L]] on 26 January 2012