Talk:Bag of holding

message: Wizards.com says that bags of holding can go in eachother. This may be a 3rd edition change, since I was pretty sure it was explicitely explosive in 2e [though I have no 2e DMG]: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20051101a
-- 72.145.143.78 20:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bags of holding together

message: Since bags of holding have infinite capacity, what would happen if one was turned inside-out? You have no proof it was me. 00:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the rules. It says it stops functioning until it is turned correctly. --zzo38(*)? 18:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Read the rules, they DO NOT have infinite capacity! --Wei Xiwu 16:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Theoretically...

message: Hi
I removed
Even if the bag is filled to capacity the objects inside never damage or even touch one another, which means that a character could fill a bag of holding full of eggs and rocks, for example, without any fear of breaking the eggs.
Block quote
Since this property is nowhere mentioned in the rules as written (RAW)
--Wei Xiwu 16:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objects touch each other 

message: This page makes mention of plot elements in a novel (Harry Potter #7) .. should it be marked as containing spoilers?
Nuez 03:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler? 

message: Background: User:Zobango unilaterally moved Bag of Holding to Holding Bag.  Here is my disagreement, which I posted on his  talk page.  --KNHaw (talk) 20:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It really should be moved back to Bag of holding - this is how it is referred to within the game, and I'm not aware of any instance where the bag is referred to as a "holding bag", regardless of what makes grammatical sense. BOZ (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

text: OK, it looks like we're not getting any real voting here but what we have is 2 to 1.  Unless I see otherwise, I'm going to change it back by next Wed. (July 30, 2008).
--KNHaw (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree with reversion. It is, and always has been Bag of Holding.  Wikipedia is not the place to reform the language, but merely to record its usage. rewinn (talk) 04:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I have reverted the name. Pls note "Holding Bag" will redirect to Bag of Holding in case anyone goes looking under that name.  In the future, please avoid renaming articles without a discussion on Talk.  rewinn (talk) 04:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To nitpick, it should probably be holding with a small-h, but good work on the bold reversion all the same.  :) BOZ (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

text: rewinn, thank you for the change.  --KNHaw (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh. Thanks for the kind words. BOZ is right about capitalization, feel free to fix my error there! I'm not as smart as I look ;-) rewinn (talk) 03:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unilateral Name Change 

message: Why did the content get blanked and then it get nominated for deletion?? AugusteBlanqui (talk) 21:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: AugusteBlanqui, you would have to ask the person who nominated it. I don't think there is any reason to delete this, personally. 2601:249:8B80:4050:4AF1:7FFF:FEE5:C031 (talk) 21:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is happening to this article?