Talk:Bispectral index

message: This article is basically free advertising. There are a number of studies that show the limits to this device. BIS is _not_  an accepted method for determining the depth of anaesthesia.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bezzera (talk • contribs) 
Give sources, websites, studies, newspaper articles (nothing unverified though). If you want to add criticism adding sources will greatly improve your arguement than you just saying it's wrong. Dmanning 20:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This is advertising

message: This article has a jumble of unresolved {fact} tags, but I'm just a wikignome and not sure where to look for the strong, appropriate citations needed (nor how to include them).  Also, it seems like some sections could be consolidated.  I've added an {expert-subject} tag to ask for help.   23:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs an expert

message: I've just added a POV article tag. I'll not iterate through all the wheres, whys and therefores. Please just click 'article' and peruse.  All the best!  Fylbecatulous talk 00:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is quite awful from "BIS relevance" down. I think that the POV sections should just be cut straight out and attempts to revert can then be justified. The central BIS relevance paragraph can then be pruned down to facts and the grammar improved. If there are no complaints I will move on this soon. --IcyEd (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

text: No complaints here.  Certainly the "COUNTERPOINT" section violates (WP:IMPARTIAL) with it's claims about "Big Pharma", "the financial interest of the ASA", etc. and should be deleted. --LaoKtn (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The needed dispute of the neutrality of this article has gone beyond the pale

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bispectral index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://medind.nic.in/iad/t02/i4/iadt02i4p323.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101128180221/http://theiaforum.org/Article_Folder/measuring-depth-of-anaesthesia-available-monitoring-systems.pdf to http://www.theiaforum.org/Article_Folder/measuring-depth-of-anaesthesia-available-monitoring-systems.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As this appears to be a (trademarked) brand name, I propose that the article title and usage throughout the article be amended to "Bispectral Index".  
—DIV Support good-faith IP editors:  insist that Wikipedia's administrators adhere to Wikipedia's own policies on keeping range-blocks as a last resort, with minimal breadth and duration, in order to reduce adverse collateral effects;  support more precisely targeted restrictions such as protecting only articles themselves, not associated Talk pages, or presenting pages as semi-protected, or blocking only mobile edits when accessed from designated IP ranges.  (1.145.32.254 (talk) 07:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation