lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Conrad III of Scharfenberg

message: Hi there!
It's stated here, that Conrad was "provost of Saint-Gervais". The fact that "Saint-Gervais" isn't linked with any matching article invites you to google for a match and as a result it's quite possible to get the idea, Conrad spent some time somewhere in France - which is not true. He really was in Speyer the whole time as provost of a stift (a kind of monastery) called "St. German". I corrected that mistake in the german article, but while trying to find out where on earth this Saint-Gervais should be, I recognized the same mistake in all four languages in which this article is availible. So I guess the source of this mistake is the same (since the articles are quite similar in every language). So if whoever feels responsible for these other articles reads this: I corrected it here, too, but my Italian is not good enough to do the same thing in all four articles...
Best regards 2A02:908:D81:7620:A50E:FC8A:B702:ACAB (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  provost of Saint-Gervais
Talk:Gay Man's Guide to Safer Sex

message: When I arrived at this page, it was marked for deletion, stating that unreleased albums should not have Wikipedia articles unless they're noteworthy.  This article is not about an unreleased album; rather, this page is about a documentary film called "Gay Man's Guide to Safer Sex," which happens to have a soundtrack by Coil.
Aside from the one link to the IMDB entry for this movie, this article is written as though it's about an unreleased album.  It's even in the category "unreleased albums".  This isn't accurate.  Either there should be two pages--one for the movie, and one for the album--or there should be only one page for the movie, which can include a section about the music used in it.  Either way, this page is inadequate.
I would like to see a page about this movie remain on Wikipedia, but I think it needs more information in it than it has right now, and needs to be clear that it's about a movie, and not an unreleased album.
Enigra (talk) 11:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be rewritten.
Talk:Cup-bearer

message: Note: this article was originally adapted from an article in the 1915 International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, which is now in the public domain -- The Anome 13:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: "The position placed his life on the line every day yet gave Nehemiah authority and high pay. , and was held in high esteem by him, as the record shows." What is this supposed to say? 71.206.217.214 (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Fail? 

message: Could somebody please tell me the source of the hieroglyph image?  I have been unable to locate any source indicating the A9 was the symbol for "cupbearer."  Please help me identify the source of this claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.40.239.83 (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hieroglyph 

message: Cześnik is the Romanian cup-bearer. The article is a short and not unique. I propose merging into its "parent" article. gidonb (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Cześnik]] 

message: A pinkernes was a Byzantine cup-bearer. Cup-bearer contains this important chapter, however it is empty with just a message to look elsewhere for information. Annoying for the reader and no need for this, as the pinkernes article is short and the cup-bearer article isn't particularly long either. gidonb (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose the Byzantine title is a very specific iteration of this court function. It has a clear scope, and can (and will some day) be augmented by a list of holders etc., therefore it should remain as a separate article. Wikipedia is full of country-specific instances of generic titles/functions. Constantine   ✍  13:03, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Pinkernes]]
Talk:Watumull Institute of Electronics Engineering and Computer Technology

message: It appears that the Watu page should be turned into a redirect to here, as the content (except for the edit I just unknowingly made to the "Watu" page) is identical.--NapoliRoma 01:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I went ahead and did it. -- JLaTondre 02:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Watu" page should be a redirect 
Talk:Greatest Hits: 87–99

message: As this is an Australian release, does anybody know if the DVD is specific to that region? I came on here to find that out, I think this information should be mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.46.13.3 (talk) 18:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD region
Talk:Greatest Hits: From the Beginning (The Miracles album)

message: In the 3rd paragraph I removed the reference to the song "Your Love (Is All I Need)" on Fury Records because that song was done by Carl Hogan & The Miracles.
See:
http://rateyourmusic.com/artist/carl_hogan_and_the_miracles
http://www.globaldogproductions.info/f/fury.html
Also changed the wording to reflect that the song "It" and its b-side, "Don't Say Bye Bye" were also omitted from the album Greatest Hits from the Beginning, but that the credit on that record on the Argo label is to "Ron & Bill" a short-lived incarnation of Ron White and Bill "Smokey) Robinson.
See:
http://rateyourmusic.com/release/single/ron_and_bill/it___dont_say_bye_bye/
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=hi8&sa=X&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&
biw=1004&bih=822&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnsb&tbnid=2NPcj_0bGwXjQM:&imgrefurl=http://www.soulwalking.co.uk/miracles.html&docid=d_HexmctR2aIfM&imgurl=http://www.soulwalking.co.uk/00Images%2525202009/Ron-and-Bill-45.jpg&w=342&h=198&ei=GvUST5bCCqSIiALCn4HsDQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=401&vpy=174&dur=2668&hovh=158&hovw=273&tx=224&ty=103&sig=117627791179466169830&page=1&tbnh=114&tbnw=197&start=0&ndsp=20&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0
Bri4daz (talk) 15:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hachez

message: I don't understand the objection. The company exists, it is mentioned elsewhere in Wikipedia. I assert that it is a company at least as remarkable as some others mentioned on the Chocolate page. Perhaps I should add "Germany's leading manufacturer of luxury chocolate bars" or something, but I don't know if I could support the assertion.YusufAlBinVeryNaughty 13:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Comment)

message: I doubt it. Ritter (Ritter Sport), Storck (merci, Moser-Roth), Stollwerck (Alpia, Sarotti), Mondelez (Milka), Krüger (Schogetten, Trumpf), Rausch (J.D. Gross), Rübezahl (Friedel, Gubor) and Ferrero (Kinder Chocolate) are all producing way more chocolate products in Germany than Hachez.
--79.210.141.209 (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second largest chocolate manufacturer in Germany? 
Talk:Half a Klip

message: These links were moved per WP:EL:
*Skope Magazine 7/4/07
*Kool G Rap teams up with DJ Premier
*Kool G Rap's Interview 1/24/07
*Kool G Rap's Interview PART 2 1/26/07
but could conceivably be used as references to improve the article. TheJazzDalek (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links removed from article
Talk:Buddha Film

message: :I have created the page Buddha Film which is a project that is entirely different from the other film Buddha (film). So a merge into the latter article is not appropriate. You have mentioned that you have merged the article to the former, which actually has not and does not require a merge too. Hence the deletion instruction is to be removed. I hope you have understood. Thanks.Yugeshp 13:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am unable to understand how you say that both the articles are about the new Buddha film, in essence they are, but please be informed there are several films named 'Buddha' and the ones in discussion are separate projects. Pls. read the article before you place deletion instructions. The one I created Buddha Film is written by D.K.Goel and is being directed by Sreedhar Allani and is scheduled for release during 2007, where the other one Buddha (film is by Thich Nhat Hanh (book) and written by David S. Ward and is scheduled for release in 2008. The view of other Wikipedians is the same as mine, which means the articles are not be merged as they talk about different projects, though the title of the film is the same. I am ending the discusssion here. You may go ahead with the deletion of the article if you wish.  I am creating a new article Buddha (2007 film) as recommended by the user Tikiwont. I hope you will be more prudent while placing deletion instructions and will take a little more care by reading the articles in detail before taking such a step. Yugeshp 14:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emma Vyssotsky

message: Emma Vyssotsky was not born in Philadelphia, but in Media (see: American Men of Science : a Biographical Directory / edited by J. McKeen Cattell and Jaques Cattell. - 5th ed. - New York : Science Press, 1933, and other sources).
The asteroid 1600 Vyssotsky was not named in her honour, but "in honor of Prof. Alexander Vyssotsky", her husband
(see L. Schmadel, Dictionary of Minor Planet Names, http://books.google.com/books?id=KWrB1jPCa8AC&pg=PA127).
Astrohist (talk) 12:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth
Talk:Hang On Little Tomato

message: Correct capitalization for this album title (according to both Wikipedia's MoS, and common industry practices) is "Hang On Little Tomato" with a capitalized "On". This is because here, "On" isn't a preposition (we're not told to go and hang, on a little tomato) but part of the two-word verb "to hang on" (Hang On, Little Tomato), and it gets capitalized along its verb.
Related MoS rules: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music/MUSTARD/Capitalization
(Accordingly, the article should be moved to the correctly capitalized name...)
62.147.36.105 14:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure I agree.  The band's website repeatedly uses a small "on".  I am not sure what to do when the primary source uses a capitalization that differs from the MoS.  For instance, there is an article at k.d. lang because that's how she capitalizes it.  This is not quite the same situation, but I'm hesitant to move it without more consensus. -Big Smooth 17:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dang, so what is it now? I'd really like to know. Nobody out there qualified to answer such matters? (Also, why isn't there a comma used?) – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 23:24, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

text: Not considering the “primary sources” and solely basing on my own understanding of the song itself, I agree with 62.147.36.105 that “hang on” is a phrasal verb and that “on” should be capitalized. -Colathewikian (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia capitalization of "Hang On"
Talk:The Phantom Creeps

message: Someone added:
The Toronto band United State also used footage for their music video "Automaton" in 1984.
I felt that it broke up the flow and added nothing significant to the article. Such information would be better in the article on the video "Atomaton" should the band "United State" be considered noteworthy enough to have articles on the band and their videos. Steve Lowther (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

message: he plays with the robot on stage!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.247.238 (talk) 00:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: ROB ZOMBIE
Talk:Hickory Wind

message: I've added references, and so am removing the 'references' tag. BuffaloSpringfield 13:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: I've removed the stub tag, after reviewing WP:stub guidelines and be bold policy BuffaloSpringfield 21:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  stub tag 

message: *No It is WP:SYNTH and WP:OR to combine sources to reach a conclusion not explicitly stated in either one. Using a reference which predates the claim of authorship to refute the claim of authorship is blatant SYNTH. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 12:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Chitty Chitty Death Bang

message: I moved the below information from the article to this talk page, because it was unsourced.
Cirt (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved unsourced from article to talk page 

message: *In this episode’s original airing, when Stewie made his birthday wish, you could hear an audio clip of Adolf Hitler giving a speech, followed by people chanting “Sieg Heil”. In Fox reruns, Adult Swim airings, TBS airings, and the DVD, it is replaced with the sound of a bomb whistling and then a big explosion. However, some Adult Swim airings have broadcasted this episode with the original Adolf Hitler audio clip.
*Syndication edits:
**The Cheesie Charlie's manager's "Heil Hitler!" in Peter's supposed flashback is removed, along with Peter's line, "Uhhhh actually the name's Griffin".
**The entire scene of Meg introducing Jennifer to Lois was removed.
**The "ass" in Brian's "If you're going to pull a party out of your ass..." has been redubbed to "butt".
**The Hitler audio clip is removed from the wish scene.
----
Of course, if and when sources are provided this can be moved back into the article.  I will try to find sources for some of this, and note it here.  Cirt (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship
Talk:Charles River Dam Bridge

message: Before he turned to property development, Andrew Craigie was America's first Apothecary General. He was the son of another Andrew Craigie, who came from the Orkney Islands and became Warden of the Port of Boston. There are biographies of both men at http://www.buyorkney.com/roots/biographies/andrew_craigie_jnr/Merrydancer 13:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " later p/o Lowell.[2] (It was not named after the short Lechmere Canal which is now near the Cambridge side of the bridge, but did not exist at the time.)"
p/o?
The sentence in the parenthesis makes no sense whatsoever.  Is it some sort of strange double negative?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.183.13.16 (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  The substance of the sentence should have been better phrased, and shouldn't have been in parentheses.  If someone wants to restore and fix the phrasing, so be it. - Denimadept (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this? 

message: Currently, this article says the bridge "[connects] Leverett Circle in downtown Boston, to Monsignor O'Brien Highway in East Cambridge, Massachusetts... The bridge is fully within Boston, with the city line to the north, at the center of the original river." I find this a bit confusing. Is the bridge entirely within Boston or not?
 Thoughts? Pinging you both as recent contributors to similar discussions at Talk:North_Point_Park_(Massachusetts)#Location and Talk:North Bank Bridge. Perhaps some wording adjustments could make this a bit more clear? ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:17, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is entirely within Boston. TomG2002 (talk) 21:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Note: TomG2002 updated the lead. Hoping others will weigh in here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: TomG2002 is correct; I added a reference with a map showing the municipal boundary. The dam goes from shore to shore, but the drawbridge is actually a very short segment of the dam. The drawbridge is located very close to the Boston shoreline, and as the boundary is approximately in the middle of the dam, the bridge is entirely within Boston. I tweaked the intro to make this clearer. -- Beland (talk) 23:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Ok, so should we remove :Category:Bridges in Middlesex County, Massachusetts if the bridge does not go into the boundaries of Cambridge? ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, yeah, that would be correct. Category:Bridges in Boston is a subcategory of the Suffolk County category, so that one removal should be all that's needed, I think. Done! -- Beland (talk) 01:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:55, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundaries
Talk:McCulloch J-2

message: Is it known if the two seats were side by side or tandem? Please add to text. LessHeard vanU 13:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input Jonwithnoh, is it possible to provide sources or citations for your information as a lot of it appears to be Original Research and could be removed in the future if it does not have references. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 11:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:N-type semiconductor

message: This should not be merged with a p-type semiconductor. This could be suggested only by a person who teaches this stuff at a high school and does not have a clue what the terms mean.
karolko (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

message: I also agree (although perhaps with not as much disdain as the last post). I am new to this function of Wikipedia; will a search for 'P-Type Semiconductor', or 'N-Type Semiconductor' still redirect  to the proposed page? I find significant utility in this search query for highschool/college students.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinmreina (talk • contribs) 16:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page 

message: Disagree with the merger, this is a valid subarticle under Semiconductors, as are P-type, I-type and Acceptor. Also see linked discussion at Talk:P-type semiconductor.  Chuckiesdad (talk) 05:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger comment 

message: N-type semiconductors are not exclusivly doped intrinsic semicondutors. I've fixed it so that it doesn't suggest this. Nitrogen doped diamond for example is an N-type semiconductor but without doping is an insulator.79.75.36.117 (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Right idea with a poor example - nitrogen-doped diamond is still an insulator, but phosphorus-doped (or boron-doped for p-type) diamond is indeed semiconductor. Materialscientist (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Nanocrystalline nitrogen-doped diamond actually conducts, though I take  your point. See P. Kulkarni, L. M. Porter, F. A. M. Koeck, Y.-J. Tang, R. J. Nemanich, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 084905 (2008).79.75.37.110 (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: At high doping, conductivity might occur through formation of the "impurity band". The problem with diamond is that such high doping levels often result in partial graphitization, and graphite conducts too. Materialscientist (talk) 22:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro wasn't really true
Talk:House of Wax: Music from the Motion Picture

message: Where in the movie is this song? I keep playing that movie and I always seem to miss it, assuming it exists. C. Pineda 08:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Never Told You What I Did for A Living
Talk:Vertigo (UTS)

message: I just tidied the page up quite a lot, but the Students Association website seems to be being rebuilt or something, and you can't get a hold of their documents through their website and only in print, hence the one source that's unreferenced. 
59.167.44.187 13:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just removed 2 sections that had inaccurate and potentially libellous material. This page seems to be prone to vandalism and a place to vent scores in the real world and bring them online.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.200.232.245 (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:All-Ohio State Fair Youth Choir

message: I don't really think we need a year-by-year breakdown. I think it would be a cleaner, most pleasant-to-read article if we broke it down into "eras". For example, we could break it down into five to ten year mini "eras", with a label for each "era" characterizing the main things about those years. Obviously the easy way to do this is to break it down between the Glenville years and the Chuck years, but I don't like that idea. I don't like the choir being broken into two like that -- we're one big family as far as I am concerned.
What does anyone think about this? (Michael Herold 17:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Year-by-year Breakdown

message: The year-by-year is completely unnecessary and is going to be removed. Also, the extensive biographies on the conductors will be abbreviated. Higgyrun3 (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: I am an alumni from '95-'97 and I'm working on my Master's Degree in Educational Technology. I am going to do some of this clean-up as part of that class. If anyone has any problems with that - please let me know! Scarey121 (talk) 15:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Volunteering to Clean-up

message: I rewrote and condensed the entire article. This is a state youth choir, and the present article is the correct size. Updating it each year with details of the songs performed and the board of directors is highly inappropriate; their annual performances at the State Fair are not the World Series. . What would help, is if anyone can add a discography. Some of the material for it is in the earlier versions of the article. Ifthere are any national-level awards, they too should be added.  DGG ( talk ) 03:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite
Talk:Lauren Powers

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. —Yamara ✉ 22:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This user keeps editing the page over the years, most recently broke the infobox, but also repeatedly kept changing the birth year back to 1961 from the 1956 set by other users. If this is actually Lauren Powers, it would be a strong WP:Conflict of interest. -- kazerniel (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Laurenpowers
Talk:Richard Wyckoff

message: Done.  How does one delete the other version of it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jccoppola (talk • contribs).
:Hi, please remember to SIGN your posts with four tildes, like it says in the box above this one. Now, about deleting the other version, what other version? bd2412 T 00:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added a page called "Composite Operator" and then merged the definition later into the Richard Wyckoff page.  Now I don't know how to delete the old page as that is duplicative content. Thanks, Jccoppola 13:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composite Operator page for deletion 

message: Clippings from The Brooklyn Daily Eagle from March 1934 show that his death was actually on March 7th and not 19th as was previously stated in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.98.55 (talk) 22:41, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:George Hunter (Coca-Cola bottler)

message: This page needs more about George Hunter's life and the work that he did during hi8s lifetime.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmilyDuggan96 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Luton Carnival

message: This article is wholly lacking in any independent references, and hence doesn't comply with WP:REF. I have added a refs tag and suitable cites where required, but its quite an unsustainable quality article at present. Rgds, -- 217.42.180.127 (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst some improvement is needed, the external links section effectivly covers the references, it just needs organising. How is the BBC not an independent reference? Over tthe top use of the citation ref isnt very helpful. Maybe some time in putting the refs in would be a better use of time? I'll have a look at some point.--GazMan7 (talk) 11:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I removed "attended by over 150,000 – 200,000 people each year,[Citation needed]" because the BBC report for 2016 says "organisers estimated there were 9-10,000 people attending, which is down on some previous years when up to 50,000 have attended". JonH (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance 