lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jagex

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Andrew Gower. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 29#Andrew Gower until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Minkerbelle (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Andrew Gower" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: In the article it's mentioned (without reference) that the name came from their OG slogan "Java Gaming Experts", however they have had their old logo with the description "Java Audio+Graphics eXtension" see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZlj694lcxA&t=1529s
They seem to have called their company after their own game engine/technology ("created with jagex")?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.90.81.14 (talk) 23:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jagex as a name.
Talk:Baron Leconfield

message: I am researching a Percy H WYNDHAM, born 1833 died 1879, the son of Charles Wyndham who was an ilegitimate son of George O'Brien Wyndham. Charles is described by some historians as "Lord leconfield". How is that possible ?
*Yes he was an illegitimate son of the last Earl of Egremont but it was George Wyndham who was created Baron Leconfield in 1859 in his own right. In fact his father had four illegitimate children (including Charles and George) by the time he married their mother in 1801. Craigy  (talk) 03:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bill Maher

message: The Religious Views of Bill Maher section has over-extensive quoting of his words. So, in effect, this article instead of stating what his views are, was turned into a platform where his views can be actively disseminated. Dear Editor, if you have a shred of integrity and decency (and honesty), please remove extensive quoting of Bill Maher's - especially where he smears Islam by effectively lying about it (the short paragraph about absence of free speech, freedom to gather, free elections, etc.). Bill has the right to his opinion, but you, the editors, do not have the right to abuse you editorial status by providing him with a platform (a Wikipedia page) to disseminate his divisive, hateful, anti-Islam misinformation and propaganda. 
Wikipedia is meant to be the source of accurate information, not a propaganda machine.
Specifically, please fully remove this paragraph from the article (cited below):
In defense of his criticism of Islam, Sharia law and Muslim culture, Maher says he "believes in the values that Western people believe in which a lot of the Muslim world does not. Like separation of church and state. Like equality of the sexes. Like respect for minorities, free elections, free speech, freedom to gather. These things are not just different from cultures that don't have them.... It's better ... I would like to keep those values here."[150] 2A0A:EF40:1281:FD01:C6F3:95AC:FF1B:D72 (talk) 18:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request to remove smearing of and lies about Islam
Talk:Charles Conder

message: Putting my amateur documentary pathologists' hat on, it sounds awfully like the poor bloke had syphillis, but I don't have any evidence for it --Robert Merkel 06:27, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: James Gleeson says he caught "the quality of summer sunlight." :) PiCo 12:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

text: (And I thought la maladie Anglaise spelled itself with only one /l/?)
dear user:The Illusive Man, why are you reverting making a bare link url into a cite web reference? 198.24.31.114 (talk) 18:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

text: *Not quite sure what happened there IP, you have my apologies. -TIM(Contact)/(Contribs) 18:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404

message: : [snip]
This material appears to duplicate that at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Rex071404/Evidence#Harsh_or_biased_comments_made_to_or_about_Rex.2C_by_others_on_the_John_Kerry_Talk_page.
Accordingly, I have deleted it, as it interferes with the arbitration process to scatter identical evidence in multiple places.
Thank you for your co-operation. Martin 21:51, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea. I have fixed the duplication I have seen. Martin 21:54, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harsh or biased comments made to or about Rex, by others on the [[John Kerry]] Talk page 

message: This subhead, Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rex071404#Retaliatory_vandalism, is duplicated on the main page; can any User correct this on the precedent page, or is this the province of the Committee?  Thank you.  nobs 02:52, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy on main page
Talk:The Osmonds

message: Shouldn't there be a Band members section on this page, just like there is on every other band's page? Just sayin'.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 04:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band members 

message: I added records sold but I know very little about this particular topic. Billboard only has one chart entry for The Osmond Brothers and may entries for The Osmonds. Sources are very misleading about how much sold only the boyband (which I wanted for this article) compared to how much the whole family sold. I guess charts counted they all as the same. If anybody knows, please fix the claim. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 05:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Records sold 

message: Its Jimmy who currently owns the theater in Branson and performs in the Christmas show, the others are not involved.  The Christmas show is hosted by Jimmy and stars the Lennon Sisters with different guest stars. 2018 it was the Lennon Grandaughters,  Voices Of Glory, Charlie Green and the Ice Angels. Jimmy was standing by the door thanking his audience as they left. I was there. 40.131.185.176 (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Andy Williams Theater 

message: I am presently watching on YouTube "The Seven Little Foys" starring Eddie Foy (1964), Jr. playing his father and the Osmond Brothers as Eddie's Children.  So why not mention whatever film roles they might have had, or even Broadway productions they might have enjoyed, even if it was Donny Osmond performing as Joseph in the 1999 film "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamoat"; while Donny did this as an adult and separate from his communal role as the Osmond Brothers, it still deserves mention.StevenTorrey (talk) 22:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no mention of their film work as the Osmond Brothers?
Talk:Aega (goddess)

message: Is is just a coincidence that Gaea (usually spelled Gaia, though) is an anagram for Aega, her daughter? • Benc • 08:09, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it is, since the spelling is different in the original Greek.  Cool point, though! -Elizabennet 02:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anagram
Talk:Korean reunification

message: The file :c:File:Emblem of the Government of the Republic of Korea.svg used in this article has been nominated for deletion on Commons 
 Reason: I think time has come to finish the long-forgotten (or ignored) question: Is  free?  I doubt its freeness, based on the fact that we do not have definite answer for Template talk:KOGL#Free?. To save your click...    We, as of 2018, do not have a final answer for this. And this means, we have to delete these images, including some VIs and FPs. 
 Deletion request: link 
Message automatically deposited by a robot - -Harideepan (talk) 07:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  File nominated for deletion on commons 

message: Regarding the necessary contents of this topic: Korea reunification, 
Please update this topic with Inter-korean summit in 2018  and Trump-Kim summit in 2018 if possible, there are new action items on these two summits. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Inter-korean summit]] in 2018  and [[Trump-Kim summit]] in 2018 

message: Should’ve include some of the reunification attempts in the past. Kim il sung did one sending ambassadors to a Korea and they were arrested. Baetylus (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information
Talk:Bicycle Thieves

message: I interpreted that scene differently. Antonio had an uncommon brand of bike and recognized the frame as his, but the Carabiniere (officer) deliberately misread the serial number, possibly paid off by the black marketers, or maybe just to avoid having to investigate it or do the paperwork. After all it's just another theft among thousands. He didn't let Antonio examine the serial number for himself, just told Antonio to trust him. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see this was edited out of the plot summary, but I got a strong impression the officer was deliberately deceiving Antonio. I'm not saying it's a fact (it's just a movie after all) but the plot summary should allow for that interpretation. It's not as if the Italian Carabinieri at the time were squeaky clean. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mismatched serial number 

message: As I said in my editsum I'm all in favour of improving plot summaries, simplifying language, removing unnecessary details etc, but not wholesale removal and replacement with a completely new summary that someone's written themselves. It's impossible for other editors to keep track of exactly what they've changed, let alone assess whether or not it's an improvement. Make any changes incremental and explain why you think they're improvements in edit summaries. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary evisceration
Talk:National Firearms Act

message: What is the state code reference for the bill in idaho mentioned near the end of the page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.41.35.164 (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing info 

message: The word "ostensible" in the first sentence seems odd and inappropriate.
:The ostensible impetus for the National Firearms Act of 1934 was the gangland crime of the Prohibition era, such as the St. Valentine's Day Massacre of 1929, and the attempted assassination of President-elect Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933
The references given state that these were, indeed, the factors. The word "ostensible" implies that there may be other reasons, but there is nothing in the reference material to support any controversy, and I believe this is speculation by the writer and, therefore, injecting an opinion where it doesn't belong. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Background
Talk:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/to do

message: * Someone find or create a larger NWS logo and replace the one I (Ta bu shi da yu) have on this page! Done TomStar81 11/6/04
* Find more links on the govt websites for the different divisions.
* Create new articles for blank entries. I've been going to the U.S. govt websites directly and inputting the data they already have. A bit of NPOVing and you have a decent Wikpedia entry!
** Entries for NOAA's Office of Oceangraphic and Atmospheric Research and its related subdivisions and affiliates have been creaetd.  Most are stubs at this time but it gives a framework for OAR. Epolk June 28, 2005 22:43 (UTC)
* The history section needs to reference the Stratton Commission report and in particular, make note of the fact that the Commission recommended that NOAA be an independent agency.  [On Sept 10, 2019 The Rachel Maddow show did a segment that implied that NOAA was "supposed" to go to Interior rather than Commerce.]  https://archive.org/details/ournationseaplan00unit/page/232. Marty MD (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion

message: Can this page be used to discuss matters relating to a template, other than deletion or merging? For example, the use of the parameters of a template, if agreement cannot be reached on the template talk page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite the name of the page, not really; it's only "for discussion" because template mergers were not deletions (according to this RM). Every once in a while someone tries to go the route of "it says discussion so let's discuss this template" but often ends up getting more backlash purely for the action than any useful feedback. If agreement can't be reached on a talk page, then I would traverse the various levels of WikiProject before maybe hitting up VPT . Primefac (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual § Other.  Specifically, please see entry on the list entitled Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 13#Category:Harold B. Lee Library-related film articles. (I am leaving this note here because it involves templates and XfD.) Thanks! HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 18:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual#Other|Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual §&nbsp;Other]]

message: You are invited to join the discussion at WT:Deletion process § Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues.  Nickps (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[:WT:Deletion process#Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues|WT:Deletion process §&nbsp;Deletion sorting should be advertised on all XFD venues]]
Talk:Fundamental attribution error

message: None given; based on this comment Firestar464 (talk) 07:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given that no case has been made, and there has been no support for this over the course of a decade. Klbrain (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Actor–observer asymmetry]] into [[Fundamental attribution error]] 

message: I noticed a meta-analysis characterized as effectively debunking the fundamental attribution error was actually a test of a distinct, but related cognitive bias. I have updated the Criticisms section accordingly and removed the implications more of interest to this other bias, the actor-observer asymmetry. Jimmysoc (talk) 23:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms Section
Talk:Uthai Thani province

message: This province have two provincial tree?--Ramendra 15:39, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oups, haven't see it until now - the first one is of course the provincial flower. andy 16:10, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

message: On the Uthai Thani town page (there's no talk page for it, so I hope it's ok to say this here) it says the town is on the railway line.  Any map will show this is not true - it's maybe 20 km to the west of it.  Perhaps someone confused it with a town in Ayuthaya province called 'Uthai'. 203.188.20.136 14:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  location of Uthai Thani town
Talk:The Greasy Chip Butty Song

message: Of course it's a gallon of maggots.  You can't get your senses filled much more than a sniff at these squirmers with some dyed red to get the right colours.    And when you put half a dozen in your mouth to get them wriggling a bit more, well say no more.
Ian
The Greasy Chip Butty Song survived vfd. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The Greasy Chip Butty Song -- Wile E. Heresiarch 15:57, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the speedy tag added to this page; it was added by a single-edit user, with no explanation. In view of the fact that this page has already survived an AfD vote it seems inappropriate to speedy it without discussion. Humansdorpie 09:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed speedy tag 

message: I've left a message at User talk:71.146.70.248 suggesting that speedy deletion is inappropriate for this article, since it has already survived an AfD (I had a moment of stupidity and thought s/he had PRODded the article twice - apologies). Humansdorpie 19:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy? 

message: I've always sang "Fulfill me again" as the last line and everyone i know has...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metallicadam (talk • contribs) 11:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Come fill me again/Fulfill me again.. 

message: There are references located on this page so I have removed theese tags.  I feel this is notable for the fact that 20,000 Sheffield United fans sing it twice in every home game.  Deevincentday (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed references and notability tags
Talk:69,105

message: It's not the usual practice to include a comma in titles of number articles.  I'm curious why it's been included here.  4pq1injbok 16:28, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it to fit in with the pattern of all the other number articles, but I suppose it doesn't hurt to have the redirect with the comma. I've also added a Docuan table and a mathematics section, but admittedly I had nothing interesting to say in it. PrimeFan 21:48, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comma

message: Trying to find things to say bout this number: its not a self number since its digit addition generator is 69081 + (6 + 9 + 0 + 8 + 1). 141.217.173.161 22:44, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Conceivably, any number containing 69 would be related to the position connotated by that number. Is it necessary, then, to include the comment about it? Or was it actually mentioned in the "Passages" book?
I'll take it out until we know.
FuzzyOnion 20:25, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
:It was actually mentioned in the Passages book as an influence on the number. Marnanel 13:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  69 

message: I do not see how an article about an recurring element from video games, with little or no content unrelated to video games, is not within the scope of WP:VG. Even were the article to contain much unrelated content, if a reasonable amount were about VGs then it would be in the scope. The template does not mean "this article is about a video game". It means this article is "video game-related". ~ JohnnyMrNinja 20:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of double negatives there. Possible even moreso. You can tell this is an argument about a number. 94.197.120.213 (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:VG

message: 1001, 2002, etc have the interesting property (well, the ones I've checked) where 6,006 hex is 60,006 oct. But that's different from 69,105's property. Actually 69,105 itself I'm struggling to see the significance of. Yep it's a number formed by sticking the forms of a number, in 2 different bases, one after the other. What's actually special about that? It's not so much a number, as a list of two numbers. Completely obvious ones. If you could pick your own bases, surely there's an infinite amount of numbers you could make up in this way. 
Apart from Infocom choosing it, it seems less interesting than most other numbers. There are thousands of numbers that have some mildly interesting little quirk about them. 
Is it fair to say that this number has no significance at all, outside Infocom? And that Infocom chose it completely randomly? 
Except they possibly wanted to sneak a smutty reference in, programmers were such nerds back then. In the good ol' days. 
94.197.120.213 (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sginificance
Talk:Santa Clara Pueblo, New Mexico

message: It is absurd to call this a town and leave it go at that, since it is an Indian reservation; the page has no links to anything about the ethnic/cultural realities.  I guess we need to look at all the other Pueblos to see if the same homogenization has happened to them too.  ;Bear 16:32, 2004 Aug 14 (UTC)
:Better now? --Pete Tillman (talk) 04:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crout matrix decomposition

message: this article is linked as Crout matrix decomposition algorithm... It'd be nice if it was algorithm here, or if the link in LU_decomposition didn't suggest sth that isn't here.
This should be described as follows
hi everyone...
the previous algorithm contained a few errors. i created matlab and C codes which work!
greetz, Nocciola1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nocciola1 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Category talk:Middle-earth Maiar

message: For reason or reasons unknown (it's probably a bug and I could probably look it up somewhere), this page is just not in alphabetical order. By editing the articles that are out of sync, I am correcting them. This will result in lots of random-seeming edits. If anyone has a better idea... Aranel 17:04, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetical order weirdness
Talk:Virginian Railway

message: Gerard: Thanks for adding the VGN herald. 
Our VGN yahoo group is very active and if you do not already belong, you may wish to check us out at the link at bottom of Virginian Railway page.
Mark Fisher (vaoverland)Vaoverland 08:37, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I'm delisting this as a good article because of POV issues (for instance "In a classic story of business intrigue" and "Fortunately, Henry Rogers recovered his health") and crufty information about mailing lists. --NE2 01:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: I have removed external links to discussion forums requiring registration, as they are a violation of WP:EL. -- HarveyHenkelmann (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No external links to discussion forums, please

message: I propose that the article Building the Virginian Railway be merged into Virginian Railway. I don't think the building article is significant enough (level similar to construction of the Transcontinental Railroad) to have its own article. Most other descriptions of railroads' constructions are in sections, not a different article. If the article gets to be merged, the history section of the VGN article mustn't be massive as well. TheGGoose (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Here's a link to an article about the electrification of the Virginian.
https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/33774/OS_ENG_v09_i02_011.pdf?sequence=4 173.216.206.160 (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article About Electrification
Talk:39 Laetitia

message: Anyone know why this asteroid was named 'Laetitia'? Two possibilities seem likely:
(1) Latin for 'perfect happiness'
(2) Various female members of the Bonaparte family, including Napoleon I's mother are named Laetitia so it may be named after one of them? (the discover was French).
Any ideas?...  The Singing Badger 18:50, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that it was named after a Greek or Roman goddes, I'm not really sure...--BorisFromStockdale 15:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Found the info actually, see article. The Singing Badger 16:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name