lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Depressive personality disorder

message: I thought this pd was is the DSM-III but was removed in the IV in favor of Dysthymia? Шизомби (talk) 14:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSM-III? 

message: The American Psychiatric Association has not released its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders into public domain, but claims copyright. The Wikimedia Foundation has received a letter of complaint (Ticket:2010030910040817, for those with access) about the use of their diagnostic criteria in this and a number of other articles. Currently, this content is blanked pending investigation, which will last approximately one week. Please feel free to provide input at the copyright problems board listing during that time. Individuals with access to the books would be particularly welcome in helping to conduct the investigation. Assistance developing a plan to prevent misuse of the APA's material on Wikipedia projects would also be welcome. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems with diagnostic criteria

message: I removed a sentence in the introduction which included the following: "[R]ecent research has shown it to be a distinct and valid diagnosis."  Where this sentence used to be, I have included the following: "Some researchers argue that depressive personality disorder is sufficiently distinct from these other conditions so as to warrant a separate diagnosis."  I think this more closely follows Wikipedia's NPOV guidelines.  Moonharpoon (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The section "Changes to Cluster C" no longer makes sense, since the accompanying diagram appears to have been deleted. Either the diagram should be replaced, or the section rewritten. --Kramer Associates (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cluster C]] 

message: Comments relating to the Axis 1 table are being automatically and instantaneously deleted, calling into question the objectivity of the entire page.  The Axis 1 table is cryptically labled, undefined, not specifically sourced, not specifically referenced, abbreviations not defined, and conclusions absent.  This table does not appear to be a result of peer-reviewed published research and thus does not qualify as anything more than unsubstantiated opinion.  (no signature)
:I agree.  The table is unsourced, "pa" is not clear for general audiences, and it isn't clear how the values in the table relate to the text in all cases.  I have added CN's to the table and the preceding study which is also unsourced, and a refimprove tag to highlight the problem. TricksterWolf (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been 10 years since and it is still missing a source. After searching and failing to find a source for the table I am going to remove it. Darcyisverycute (talk) 04:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  General (Unsourced Material)
Talk:Buckskin Frank Leslie

message: I am currently adding material to your article on Nashville Franklyn "Buckskin Frank" Leslie. That article currently goes under the main head (at the very top of the page in large type)of Franklin Leslie - which is incorrect. Could you, or one of the other editors, please change that head to read Buckskin Frank Leslie. Jack DeMattos (talk) 15:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you asking to change the name of the entire article? If so, what are the sources supporting the name change? Thanks! — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 17:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franklin Leslie 

message: The article states "he ended his days drunk and penniless.....in 1930......it was estimated that this Frank Leslie was about 80-81...."
However, the very next paragraph implies that the U.S. Census on January 27, 1920 listed him at 77 years old.
If he was 77 years old in 1920, wouldnt he have been closer to 80 years old by 1930?ENumC (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: A 22 year long member and prolific editor of Findagrave.com known as Mr. Ed has listed on his website from supposed trusted sources that Frank had died most probably broke and homeless by possible suicide in San Francisco at 85 years old in Oct 1927. It was confirmed by a former wife Elnora Torbet who was still known as Mrs Elnora Leslie at her death in 1934 that Frank was deceased for a few years by that time. Sevenigma (talk) 09:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leslie's death 

message: Why is his height given? Seems bizarre. 188.241.144.115 (talk) 20:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, what is the source of his height? 188.241.144.115 (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height
Talk:Yellow Crane Tower

message: It is the poem "Yellow Crane Tower" of Cui Hao made this landmark so famous, not the one of Li Bo, so I changed the order of these two poems. Rungbachduong (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cui Hao 

message: I cleaned up parts of the article, and tried separating the article into much needed sections. But if you think of better section titles, please change them. --Eugeniu B (talk) 22:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: This article lacks completely a section on the tower's history. IMHO in its current state it's almost a stub. 79.7.246.12 (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History!

message: The present sourcing for the legends is vague.  Given that both appear to flatly contradict its history, specific, quality sources are required.  Additionally, we have the use of an unrelated sacred site for the 1981 reconstruction.  We need an explanation as to how that has happened and why it was/is not regarded as desecration of the site.  Serious questions here need to be addressed.  sirlanz 23:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Legend contradiction and sourcing

message: this article seems to contract the idea the top floor is mostly off limits to most visitors.--Prisencolin (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top floor off limits to general public 

message: I'm not sure if the coordinates here are incorrect or whether Google is rendering them incorrectly (Google Earth is definitely is mismapping nearby sites). But perhaps someone in Wuhan can confirm the location via GPS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwarner (talk • contribs) 01:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Co-ordinates are accurate to within one second, which is the best that wfmlabs offers, evidently. sirlanz 02:54, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: Who translated the two poems in the article? 2600:1700:7720:A170:A98F:EF65:7CB2:CEA6 (talk) 05:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translators?
Talk:Clathrate compound

message: The illustration shows the structure of triphenylmethane but it is labeled "triphenylcarbinol". AdderUser (talk) 03:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Over two years later, someone has placed a cleanup tag on the :File:Clathrate compounds.png diagram (since transferred to Wikimedia Commons), so I have added a warning note to caption in this article. When the diagram is fixed or replaced with a correct one, please remove the warning note. -84user (talk) 02:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure -- Name error 

message: A note about the clathrin protein seems relavent  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.246.227 (talk) 22:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clathrin 

message: Is a clathrate necessarily a three-dimensional compound?  Such is implied by the "Related materials" section, which says:
Intercalation compounds are not 3-dimensional, unlike clathrate compounds.
However, the main example diagram - "the 3:1 inclusion complex of urea and 1,6-dichlorohexane" - appears distinctly flat, and thus essentially a two-dimensional lattice, although the accompanying text speaks of "hexagonal channels" rather than "hexagonal holes", thus implying that the hexagons are somehow aligned across layers.
Please clarify this if you can.
yoyo (talk) 18:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimension 
Talk:Simulcast

message: I believe some mention of the difference between simulcast and simulpost should be made (from Urban Dictionary: Two or more contributors to a message board post so closely together in time that the messages receive the same timestamp.)
----
In Portland, Oregon, theres a church called city bible church, www.citybiblechurch.org, they use simulcast to have church in 3 different locations.
The speaker will go to one location, and will be broadcast onto the screens at the other 2 churches, live 
how can we add that? 76.115.141.53 (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Working in TV for eons, I've never come across this method, other than a brief mention by Howard Cosell about some people turning the sound down on ABC's MNF and listening to CBS's MNF. Some citations and sources would be nice, because otherwise, I'm likely to call the whole thing phony. Apple8800 (talk) 04:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History part 

message: *http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/lexicon.php?id=121
*http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/feature/2012-03-09
*http://flowtv.org/2010/07/niche-market-global-scale/
*http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art171369.asp
*http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/anncast/2012-03-09
--Atlantima (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources about anime simulcasting 

message: I'm just wondering about this sentence: "Another application is the transmission of the original-language soundtrack of movies or TV series over local or Internet radio, with the television broadcast having been dubbed into a local language." 
Did that really ever happen? I would think getting an Internet radio stream to synchronise with a television broadcast would be nearly impossible. 86.140.32.192 (talk) 23:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really?
Talk:Current limiting

message: What is this mysterious "drive circuit"?  Delete the drive circuit.  Add a bias resistor from Vcc to Q2 collector.  The current limit is set by Rsense:
:Imax = Vbe / Rsense
—Ryan 08:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Foldback (power supply design) could profitably be merged with this article to improve the discussion of the topic here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion February 2020

message: The section _Single power-supply circuits_ is good, showing two examples for NPN and PNP transistors. The example picture for PNP shows where the voltage output Vo is, but this is missing from the NPN picture. Can the NPN picture be updated to also show the Vo output symbol?
--Dojcubic 29 September 2020  —Preceding undated comment added 21:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned up this article a little bit, but I didn't edit the schematic.  I've run into similar problems in other electronics articles too.  For these types of problems, until a schematic is fixed, I have: 1) added text in the caption to clarify important missing information, 2) added a hidden note after the photo as a reminder that it needs to be fixed at some future date. :: Though not the best solution, it's better than doing nothing.  At some point in the future, I need to spend some time learning how to edit and create schematics on Wikipedia.  These are the edits that I did tonight: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Current_limiting&type=revision&diff=981255006&oldid=978425950  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 06:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: NPN example picture enhancement
Talk:Polypropylene glycol

message: I have added a new use with inline cite. Also looks like the article could use one or two more literature references.GRALISTAIR (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: New use

message: For such a key article this light on references. I am going to make a start adding some as there are some excellent references in some well respected peer-reviewed academic journals GRALISTAIR (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Rook polynomial

message: I propose to remove the category tag "Combinatorial game theory".  My reason:  That tag is appropriate to articles that use combinatorics to treat games.  This article, on the contrary, uses one aspect of the chess game to facilitate math.  From the math viewpoint, it's merely a coincidence that chess has a rook.  The reason for continuing interest in rook polynomials (despite the way the article is written) is not due to chess, but to the connection with permutations.
(In that connection, the definition of a rook polynomial is too narrow.  I will deal with this later.)
For the same reason I would remove "Recreational mathematics".  Besides, the latter contains "Chess and mathematics" as a subcategory.
I would not remove "Chess and mathematics" because, even if it might be regarded as a coincidence, the article, plainly, does connect chess and mathematics.
The other categories are Generating functions | Enumerative combinatorics | Polynomials | Factorial and binomial topics | Permutations.  All are strictly mathematical topics that are closely connected to the reasons for interest in rook polynomials.
Any opinions? Zaslav (talk) 21:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Zaslav (talk) 00:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ironic, automatically(bot done) the chess project template was added because the article is in a chess category. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games or math? 

message: I created this article but am not satisfied with its present state for which I blame entirely myself. It contains too many specific examples and too little general theory. For example, there is almost nothing about the generating function: where it comes from (principle of inclusion-exclusion, Latin and Graeco-Latin rectangles), what is its more general class, what are the hit and associated rook polynomials, the most general theorem for all cases, including restricted positions, connection with the respective distribution as a moment generating function, etc.
I intend to return back and write these more mathematical (combinatorial) sections. Any help is welcome! Lantonov (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further development
Talk:Gunderam Defense

message: Moves(1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Qe7 3.Bc4 g6 4.Nc3 c6 5.d3 Bg7) and position don't match. Pawn on c6 or d6? ChessCreator (talk) 09:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted to basic position after 2...Qe7 ChessCreator (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position shown 

message: The sources (see in the article) stating that the Câmara Defense should be named as such appear weak to me for the moment. More reliable sources do not use this name:
* , Tartakower's Bréviaire des Echecs and van Seters' Guide Marabout des Echecs do not use a particular name
*  and  calls it the Gunderam defense
So I want to rename the article to Gunderam defense. The move has already been proposed for discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chess#Camara_Defense. Please give your opinion here or there. SyG (talk) 12:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There did not seem to be any opposition, here or there, after a week, so I've moved the page, per the above request. Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 18:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! SyG (talk) 16:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The link to chess-theory.com is dead.  I don't know how to edit the references to note this.  Perhaps someone more experienced can.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.10.239 (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Reference 

message: I propose merging Brazilian Defense into Gunderam Defense. According to the leads of both articles, which use the wording "also known as", the two names are synonymous, and they are also treated as synonymous in a number of other online fora. Later on in the articles, the Brazilian seems to be described as a specific variant of the Gunderam, but I don't think that warrants two separate articles - and certainly not two articles that refer to each other as "also known as". Does anyone have objections to my proposal? Nikolaj1905 (talk) 12:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope I have tagged everyone who has a stake in the discussion. I noticed that the two articles seem to have been merged previously, but that the merger was undone by Lordstrahler. I am curious to know the reason for this. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 12:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

text: Thank you for the input. Since there have been no protests, I have merged the articles. This is the first time I have done a merge, so I apologize if I have made any errors. If you find an error, do not hesitate to correct it! Nikolaj1905 (talk) 08:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Microdot (car)

message: The title seems to imply the use of microdots in a automotive context, e.g. , but ti seems to refer to a specific car... The disambiguation page does not even mention the microdotting of cars (which is compulsory in some places) MoHaG (talk) 07:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is info about microdots in cars here Microdot#Microdot_identification though... MoHaG (talk) 07:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing title
Talk:ASEAN Charter

message: Wow.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.0.102 (talk) 09:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The New World order sure is moving fast 
Talk:Oliver Cox

message: The article on Oliver Cox refers to him as Marxist. This is an understandable mistake because Dr. Cox often spoke about class conflict and criticized capitalism at length. However, Dr. Cox fundamentally disagreed with Marx's analysis of capitalism. He regarded Marx as one of the classical economists who, he believed, misunderstood the role of foreign trade in the process of capitalist economic growth. Cox held that the classical economists viewed foreign trade as trade in surpluses. He, on the other hand, regarded foreign trade as the main driving force in capitalist development. For Cox there was no such thing as an isolated capitalist nation. There was, instead, an international capitalist system. The relationships between the components of that system were crucial for understanding how it functioned. Cox saw this as a basic difference between his views and those of Marx. A brief statement of his views can be found in chapter 13 of Capitalism as a System. The main article should be amended to reflect his views accurately.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.158.123.10 (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Type 80 Air-to-Ship Missile

message: 'Type 80 Air-to-Ship Missile (80式空対艦誘導弾, ASM-1) is the first non-suicide Air-to-ship missile developed in Japan.'
Sorry, but is 'non-suicide' really necessary here? 86.132.23.54 (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kamikaze reference

message: Would it not make more sense to merge Type 88 and 90 (and maybe 91 and 93) into this article, being variants of the same basic missile? We don't have separate articles for the different Harpoon variants for instance.86.27.38.182 (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Local field potential

message: I'd like to have a stab at improving this article.  I've used local field potentials as a research tool for most of my career, so I'm familiar with their nature and uses.  I have been considering for a while writing a primer on recording LFP for people in my field, and doing some work on this article might get the juices flowing for that endevour. Synaptidude (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision/Improvement

message: Can anyone please provide proper references for the articles cited in the text? I mean, just providing (Gray, 1995) is not really helpful... There is many Gray that has produced articles in 1995.--130.235.144.172 09:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Eliott Rodriguez

message: I have found sources for the Emmys but this article really could do with a few sources that are *independent of the subject*. --Malcolmxl5 11:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Interior lines

message: Hi everybody! After a prolonged literature cross-reading session I have a little bit the impression, that the rather variegated terms in the category Line of operation like: Line of effort, Passage of lines, non-linear movement, multilinear Warfare, i will never be able to trace back to a creator. Some, although declared obsolete, are used surprisingly often: (Logical line of operation) and authors have not only presented widely contradictory definitions but also disagree on the number and validity of the defining factors. But maybe i should just have an extra night's rest and see again. All the best Wikirictor 11:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitions
Talk:Flux (Bloc Party song)

message: False.  Not from an album at all.  Has been changed.  WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden 22:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "From the album 'A Weekend in the City'" 

message: Should lyrics not be included, or does wiki not like this? Massau (talk) 21:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lyrics" 
Talk:Research and Documentation Center in Sarajevo

message: Hi, great initiative to create a page about this group. However, it seems the description of them is based on their own description of themselves without statis this. So, instead of writing: 
"The Research and Documentation Center (RDC) is an independent...." 
I suggest writing 
"The Research and Documentation Center (RDC) describes itself as an independent..." and so on. 
OK? Osli73 10:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description
Talk:Archibald Douglas, Parson of Douglas

message: I am not convinced that Jean was married to a laird of Saltcoats Castle, as suggested by the addition made on 10th July 2020. The armorial stone of the builder, Patrick Levingtoun of Saltcoats, now mounted over the front door of a nearby ruined cottage, probably came from over the door of the castle, and the date must be 1592 (the second digit crudely recut as a 3) records the initials PL and MF for Patrick Levingtoun (various spellings) and his wife Margaret Fettis of Fawside.  This would be about the time that Jean, nee Douglas, had her children. I suggest that perhaps it was perhaps a Saltcoats, Ayrshire family she married into.  Meanwhile, I acknowledge that her brother, as mentioned, was a Douglas of Whittingham, also situated in East Lothian just a dozen miles from Saltcoats Castle. Or perhaps Margaret died early in the marriage? Shipsview (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean, Lady Saltcoats
Talk:Assassination of William McKinley

message: White House Blues
Charlie Poole and the North Carolina Ramblers recorded a song called "White House Blues" about the McKinley assassination.  It has been covered by many groups.  Notably Bill Monroe recorded a breakneck paced version, and it is this version that is most imitated.  
I have a question.  Most of the song is historically accurate enough but there is a verse--
Doc on his horse.  Threw down the reins.
Said to the horse you've got to outrun that train.
What is this in reference to?  Nothing in the article tells me.  
Should have a reference to the song in the article.
Conscientia (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

message: I have never put together the sequence of American presidents assassinated before. This article does it nicely in the very first short paragraph. Next was John F. Kennedy. Krok6kola (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article 

message: In the "A day at the fair; excursion to Niagara Falls" subsection of the section "Presidential Visit," the final clause of the first sentence of the sixth paragraph reads: "pausing at the Triumphal Bridge to watch the fair illuminated by electricity as the sunset."
To match the intended meaning, the sentence should read either "by electricity as the sun set" or "by electricity by the sunset." Amocito0113 (talk) 16:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The version of this article that passed review had "sun set". I will restore that. Wehwalt (talk) 17:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Fix