lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zzzz

message: This is the last page using the A-Z index that uses only the 26 letters of the alphabet as used in the English language.-h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 20:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As an uninvolved active admin familiar with disambiguation pages, would you have a look at this please? Please look at this edit and those that follow it, and then 's response at User talk:Joefromrandb#ZZZZ. Thanks, Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Cheers! BD2412 T 17:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Exactly. Fixed. I'm not sure why you needed to seek out a hall monitor to fix something you could have fixed yourself, rather than clinging to the bizarre idea that it's ok to re-add something that you were (twice) shown was wrong because "the red link appears in the other article". As for telling you to fuck off, it was a proper, albeit restrained response. You referred to a necessary edit as "unconstructive", cited a completely irrelevant guideline, and told me not to "swear at you again" when you knew fucking right well I hadn't sworn at you in the first place. I believe it was our beloved Giano who said: "baiting is a dangerous sport when you fail to gauge the size of your prey". Joefromrandb (talk) 18:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  You could have implemented this solution yourself, which would have been the better course of action. At this point, this is a discourse that you should step away from. BD2412 T 20:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree. I don't think that your version is preferable at all but at least it's factually correct. I maintain that removing it was the ideal solution, and therefore "the best course of action", at least when put against the false dichotomy insinuated by your use of the word "better". Incidentally, your changes pointlessly and actually problamatically removed the link I had added to the solitary naked entry on the page, the only reason an entry should exist on a disambiguation page. Perhaps it was hard to see from upon the high horse you mounted to lecture me. Joefromrandb (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoiding an edit war
Talk:Westisle Composite High School

message: I've added the Principals & most of the VP's aswell. The list isn't completed however. Take note, Westile has always employed two concurrent vice-principals. GoodDay 21:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed 'Thomson' from the VP's list. Since she's no longer a vice principal. It's more correct (see other Wiki articles) to simply put vacant. GoodDay 18:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Principals & Vice Principals

message: I know this is not the place to ask, but! Does anybody know who the Westisle Principal was, between Roberts & MacDougall? He's the fellow who got fired. GoodDay (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Seeking info
Talk:James Parker

message: *Jim Parker (journalist) (born 1958), New Zealand-born writer and journalist
*James Parker (printmaker) (1757–1805), English printmaker
*Sir James Parker (Vice Chancellor) (1803–1852), English judge and vice-chancellor
*James Parker (judge), federal judge in the United States
Redlinks moved from article. They need a relevant blue link before they can be re-added to the article. Tassedethe (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks

message: Shouldn't the Jamie Parker / Jamie Parker (politician) be listed ? -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Jamie?
Talk:University Clinical Aptitude Test

message: does anyone know what the maximum score is for the UKCAT?
The UKCAT is scored by section. You can score between a 300 and a 900 in each of the first four sections. The average, according to the UKCAT Consortium, is between 500 and 700 on each subtest.
Some universities operate a cut off - whwre they will not interview candidates with a score below XXX - this will vary each year and may be applied as a cutoff for the total score or for a minimum in each section.  
( This website )have put together a free applicant guide which outlines how each university uses the results
do you need UKCAT for veterinary science?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.249.49.88 (talk) 14:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are humans behind the bots, but anyway, no, that way of linking is promotional, even for a free website.  Please read the policies and guidelines which have been laid out to you, and try to edit according to them.  Happy editing.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This wikipedia entry remains an encyclopaedia entry, not a place to promote pages for commercial purposes. This still means if the service/page being linked to is free. Read the guidelines on the editing of Wikipedia entries. Also in Talk pages.
Persistent use could result in commercial entity placed on spam list and immediate removal from major search engine pages. Medify (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spammers 

message: Recently it was announced that Australian and New Zealand universities will adopt this test for degrees in the areas of Medicine, Dentistry and Clinical Science. (http://www.ucatofficial.com/)
Apparently the new name 'UCAT' or 'University Clinical Aptitude Test' will be adopted some time from now until, at the very latest, December 2019. 
Just wanna throw this out there just in case I'm jumping the gun in renaming the article right now :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wynterheim (talk • contribs) 06:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  UKCAT to be renamed University Clinical Aptitude Test in the future 

message: It may be relevant to mention that the abstract reasoning section often includes Bongard problems. (20040302 (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bongard problems
Talk:List of current state governors in Nigeria

message: lint all the names 36 govemors and state in nigerla  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.89.33.7 (talk) 18:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIVIC 

message: The war of the roses 102.67.11.35 (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: governor's of  the 36 states 102.88.62.160 (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civic education  

message: God loves you@ 105.112.37.38 (talk) 09:37, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crs 

message: governor's name 129.205.114.29 (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Lagos 129.205.114.29 (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

text: List the current Governor of the 36 States in Nigeria 105.113.107.32 (talk) 17:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

text: cynthia@Italic 105.113.107.32 (talk) 17:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of current governor in Nigeria
Talk:HD 147506

message: :...a K of ~900...
What is a "K"? — JyriL talk 21:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: temperature 75.57.104.48 21:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The K is an abbreviation for Kelvin.—RJH (talk) 22:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: K?

message: Did so before finding this page.  Both stars and planets seem to get listed elsewhere, so there is no need to merge - especially since the star may have a second planet.  --GwydionM 18:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a page for the planet
Talk:List of manufacturing processes

message: Isn't knurling more relevant to the "Finishing" section rather than the "Turning" section? (I don't feel strongly enough to just move it, though.) Dan Griscom 11:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I could be persuaded otherwise, but it seems to me that it fits better in "Turning". I guess because it can be done with a lathe. But then does knurl rolling fit under "Stamping" or "Coining" or some place like that? Maybe "finishing" isn't so bad (although it strikes me as cutting a bit more deeply into the surface than the other techniques currently there).  I don't know.  No such classification can be perfect. Perhaps there is a non-wikipedia classification we should base it on. Kingdon 19:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: This article should be re-named Taxonomy of production processes in metals manufacturing and then three new articles would need to be created:
Taxonomy of production processes in plastics manufacturing 
Taxonomy of production processes in glass manufacturing 
Taxonomy of production processes in timber manufacturing 
203.108.140.130 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-name and move content to new articles 

message: This article was tagged as a copyright problem on February 2nd, here. I have done a google book search through the text in question, here, and have been unable to verify that this article replicates material from that book. Lacking evidence of infringement, I have restored the text. If further steps are necessary, please follow the additional processes at Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Copyright and be sure to provide enough information to substantiate your claim of copyright ownership. If further evidence can be provided on this talk page, it may be appropriate to relist the matter for investigation at the copyright problems board by tagging the article . --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright concerns 

message: Someone went to the trouble to re-type this information from the original source at this location: http://adl.serveftp.org/skdb/taxonomy.yaml -- kanzure (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data collected from the original source
Talk:Benoit Schillings

message: 2010-02-10. The article is outdated. Benoit Shilling is not at Trolltech anymore. 
He moved to Myriad.
He's probably behind the Davilk Turbo JVM.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.108.33.15 (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New moves 
Talk:Head (music)

message: This article has to this point been extremely poorly written.  Those who have contributed are obviously not jazz musicians themselves, judging by the narrow band of information provided which is misleading at best.  I could write quite a bit on this subject, but I don't have the time right now so I'm putting an expertise-whatevermajigger tag on it and a complete rewrite tag as well.  We need someone who plays jazz music at a professional level and participates in jam sessions on a regular basis to write this up. Dextrose 21:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires rewrite 

message: Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 23:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 10:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 013

message: Andreasegde added the following to the previous newsletter after it had been sent out; "Cynthia Lennon is also close to being nominated as a GA candidate." It will likely need updating before this Newsletter goes out, but at least it is a start.LessHeard vanU 21:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

message: He helped produce the BBC segment of the "Our World" 1967 global TV production whose UK "bit" was the Beatles singing "All You Need Is Love". Hello?  ...hello?... LessHeard vanU 23:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Aubrey Singer]] is dead 

message: The Traveling Wilburys Collection was released June 12, 2007 by Rhino, in association with Wilbury Records. It's a 2007 box set compilation album comprised of both albums by the Traveling Wilburys and a DVD with their videos and a documentary about the group. Alexcalamaro 14:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Traveling Wilburys Collection
Talk:Tulk and Ley

message: I am planning to write a separate article for Fletcher Jennings. Biscuittin 21:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fletcher, Jennings section moved to Fletcher, Jennings & Co.  I think this is appropriate because F-J is the better-known name and there are F-J locomotives preserved.  Biscuittin 20:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

message: There is some disagreement between the text and the table.  I believe the table is correct but I have left the text as it is, pending further research.  If anybody has more information, please add it. Biscuittin 11:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crampton locomotives 

message: According to Lowe number 17 was built in 1850, not delivered till 1854.
Then no more till 1855 numbers 18, 19 and (poss a rebuild) 20  Chevin 16:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Chevin.  There has also been speculation that No.17 was built in 1847 (with nos. 13-16) and not sold till 1854. Sharman is sceptical about this because of detail differences between the locomotives.  After the collapse of Railway mania in the 1840s there may have been a slump in the demand for locomotives so perhaps Tulk and Ley decided to switch to other work.  We will probably never know for sure. Biscuittin (talk) 10:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Works Numbers 17 on=
Talk:National Council of Asian Pacific Americans

message: The Executive Committee section is out of date. However, rather than update it (and soon it will no doubt again be out of date...), I propose to delete it; having one's name fleetingly appear on a Wikipedia article may massage the ego of the person in question, but I reckon for most readers seeing a list of names like this provides little or no value. (If anyone does want to know the names, they can be readily obtained from the organisation's website.) So if you — yes, you! — are reading this note, and it's the year 2021 or later and nobody has meanwhile objected to my proposal, could you please just go ahead and delete that section. Ta muchly. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Executive Committee section — delete?
Talk:Coat of arms of Ustka

message: I changed "as remote as China" to "as far away as China" because, to me, remote implies hard to reach or out of the way. However, I looked at the edit history and saw that someone had previously changed it from "distant" to "remote", effectively the opposite of my edit. I prefer it as it is but maybe people disagree. - 86.42.162.172 14:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never in a lifetime of reading seen "far away" hyphenated. Hopefully the current edit covers all the bases... - 86.42.140.233 17:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Remote" vs "far away" or "distant" 

message: A big deal is made out of the breast enlargement, but the addition of a crown on the mermaid's head, a modification much more significant from the heraldic point of view, is not mentioned, let alone explained in the article. Could someone shed any light on this? — Kpalion(talk) 08:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Mermaid problem. Valentinian T / C 10:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mermaid's crown 

message: The coat of arms of Stolpmünde in Pomerania, Germany, now Ustka, Poland, was created in 1922 by artist Wilhelm Granzow from a local Stolp and Stolpmünde family, who traced their ancestry to the same area of Pomerania for over 500 years. The local museum in todays Ustka features Wilhelm Granzow is featured in an exposition in the museum in Ustka. The ship, mermaid and fish depicted on the arms symbolize the town's main sources of income: the seaport, tourism and fishery respectively. The coat of arms can be found in various places throughout the city, with the most remarkable of these being the monument of the Dying Warrior which commemorates the 76 inhabitants of Stolpmünde that perished during the First World War.
-because of repeated willfully removals of information by Space Cadet posted here- Wilhelm Granzow created the coat of arms of Stolpmünde, the monument commemorates the perished inhabitants of Stolpmünde.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.133.64.78 (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stolpmünde coats of arms by Wilhelm Granzow 
Talk:Jim Cherneski

message: Has anyone established independent standards for notability of soccer figures?   I can't imagine that a third-tier manager in a country of only moderate significance in world soccer could possibly fulfill the requirements of WP:NOTE, but maybe the soccer project has some independent standards I've never heard of. - PhilipR (talk) 03:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Ozark Jubilee

message: I forgot to put this down yesterday, so the error is mine.
The reason this article quick failed is for the following reasons:
# Use WP:CITET for marking your sources on a consitent basis.
# All of the images shown seem like they are forced. If they are in thumb, the size shown will take care of itself.
# On "Was the Jubilee "first"" section, where are the inline citations?
# On the "ABC-TV schedules" section, where on the inline citations on this any why is the early ABC-TV logo in this section?
# On the "Red Foley and the rise of Springfield", more inline citations are needed.
# On the "Cast" section, more inline citations are needed for all of the subsections, including "Cast" and "Guest stars". Change the $ to USD.
# In the "Patsy Cline" subsection, when in January 1956 did she debut on Ozark Jubilee?
# In the "Audience" section, premier misspelled. It should be premiere. Also list when the final Jubilee USA ticket date took place.
# For the "Production" section, the image of Foley, Disney, and Allison did not show up when printed. Why is that? Also, list the locations of the trio in the image caption shown. The University of Missouri does not need to be italicized per WP:MOS. An article for Bob Tubert needs to be created.
# Inline citations are needed for the "Kinescopes" section.
# Move the portals in the "See also" section to the "External links".
# The Don Baker link in the "External links" is a dead link. Please find another link for this if possible.
Chris (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for GA failure
Talk:List of political groups by country

message: We should make a clear clear difference between an alliance and a coalition over 'ere... --PaxEquilibrium 22:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Crna Gora, is that a political Alliance? I believe it's a coalition, and not an alliance. --PaxEquilibrium 23:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: === Probably a mistake === 
These comments are based on the "Latest revision as of 09:10, 17 February 2021" version of this article (the "Political alliance" article). 
The opening sentence of the second paragraph of the article currently says:Coalition governments are formed when a political alliance comes to power, or when only a plurality (not a majority) has not been reached and several parties must work together to govern.and (as you can see) it contains a superfluous instance of the word "not". 
That sentence should (and does) contain at least one instance of the word "not". The occurrence of the word "not" in the (parenthetical) phrase "(not a majority)" is sufficient. It is supremely adequate. The presence of another occurrence of the word "not", in the locution "has not been reached" is incorrect. 
=== How to fix it === 
My ["minor"] suggestion is: to remove the word "not" right after "has" and right before the words "been reached". Doing that would changewhen only a plurality [...] has not been reached
-- which seems kinda crazy to me -- intowhen only a plurality [...] has been reachedwhich sounds more logical. Besides the fact that [the main point, there, is that] it is a majority -- not a "plurality"!  -- that has not been reached, I would also point to the presence of the word "only" as evidence that the intent was, or it should have been, to say that only a plurality [...] has been reached. IMHO the locution << only a plurality [...] has not been reached >> was obviously not intentional. 
 
=== Any comments? === 
Before I go to edit this article, now might be a good time for some comments ... if any.
Thanks for listening. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  MINOR correction needed  

message: Before I go to edit this article, now might be a good time for some comments ... if any.
Thanks for listening. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any comments? 

message: Very similar pages Political group, Coalition, Political alliance.
Not to be confused with Coalition government, Parliamentary group. HudecEmil (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Renamed to List of political groups by country, closed. HudecEmil (talk) 01:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Phoenix (1821 whaler)

message: Came across the following; might be helpful for someone. Gwinva 21:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful links

message: Not further identified.  This is one of the Shantar Islands. Pustelnik (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Elbow Island
Talk:Hibernian Rifles

message: The article metnions "Harrel's 'Battle of Clontarf'", although no explanation is given as to what this actually means. Could anyone enlighten us?--Damac (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In a nutshell, "Harrel's 'Battle of Clontarf'" was the confrontation that took place between the Irish Volunteers and the King's Own Scottish Borderers and DMP following the landing of IV arms at Howth in 1914, just before the outbreak of WW1. The DMP officer in charge, Assistant Commissioner W.V Harrel, on his own initiative, called out a detachment of the army. In the stand-off they recovered about twenty rifles but largely thanks to distractions by Darrell Figgis, Bulmer Hobson and Seán Mac Diarmada, most of the arms and ammunition were safely dispersed. The frustration of the soldiers exploded on their return to the city at Bachelor's Walk, when they opened fire on a jeering crowd killing several civilians. Harrel was blamed for the 'incident' and was 'moved on'.RashersTierney (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  query
Talk:Amplitude of accommodation

message: i think there is something wrong in the article. The Amplitude of Accommodation, also known as the accommodative response, is the maximum increase in diopter power obtainable by an eye.
:Yes, I agree the current definition is somewhat misleading. The Amplitude of Accommodation is the range between a fully relaxed eye (longest focus) and a maximally "focused" eye (shortest focus), in diopters. A person may have sufficient accomodation, and still have trouble with near distance (Theoretically the lens could be focused "beyond infinity", due to some rare, extreme farsighted condition that doesn't impact accomodation.) Turidoth 20:45, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading definition
Talk:List of Footballers' Wives characters

message: This article needs something of an introduction to properly put this list into context...  SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: The majority of Footballers' Wives characters have not received a sufficient amount of coverage in reliable, secondary sources to justify their own articles. As such, the following articles should be merged here: Jackie Webb, Kyle Pascoe, Eva de Wolffe, Amber Gates, Conrad Gates, Lucy Lockheart, Bruno Milligan, Shannon Donnelly-Lawson, and Liberty Baker. Neelix (talk) 20:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Jackie Webb]], [[Kyle Pascoe]], [[Eva de Wolffe]], [[Amber Gates]], [[Conrad Gates]], [[Lucy Lockheart]], [[Bruno Milligan]], [[Shannon Donnelly-Lawson]], and [[Liberty Baker]] 