Talk:Beaches (1988 film)

message: A "chick" movie starring Bette Midler and Barbara Hershey. Contains all the classic things that make up a chick movie. Love lost, jealousy, marriage, children, and a heart wrenching death.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamal M (talk • contribs) 04:11, 29 August 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why do all cultural references to this film have to be removed. Do some people have nothing better to do than just go around deleting references because THEY find it irrelevant? Cattona (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The usual arguments are presented at WP:TRIV and WP:HTRIV. -Verdatum (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: No mention that it has a cult following?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.63.3 (talk) 19:23, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cult 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Beaches (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706095646/http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/legacy/ceremony/61st-winners.html to http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/legacy/ceremony/61st-winners.html
*Added  tag to http://entertainment.suntimes.com/.../world-premiere-beaches-musical-drury-lane
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Beaches (film) →  – There is more than one film with the title Beaches that has an article. Per WP:PRIMARYFILM, as this is not the primary topic of "Beaches", it needs to be disambiguated with release year against the other films. See Parasite (film) for a similar discussion, and long-standing consensus at Titanic (film). BOVINEBOY2008 10:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If this film was the primary topic, it would simply be at Beaches. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have no objection to that. The film gets more pageviews than Beach. But I'm not proposing a move, just opposing a totally unnecessary one. The recent RfC confirms that there is consensus that a topic with a parenthetical qualifier can be a primary topic, and the pageviews are convincing in this case, that this film is the clear primary topic between the two films with articles. Station1 (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Is someone going to total the amount of times Station1 was told that at RMs in 2020? In ictu oculi (talk) 13:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Just thought of an easy way to prove this point.  Search YouTube for "beaches." The first results that come up that are not about actual beaches are either clips from this film (especially the famous scene near the end at the beach house when Midler glances back at Hershey with an alarmed look) or clips of music videos of songs that are often on the same playlists as Wind Beneath My Wings.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Google is mixed but returns more results for the landform but Images and Books only returns the landform which is clearly primary if anything by long-term significance, I'd be fine with having no primary topic (by redirecting "Beaches" to Beach (disambiguation) or making it a separate DAB) but the 1988 film isn't primary per WP:PLURALPT. Crouch, Swale (talk)  09:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Long-term significance?  Most educated native English speakers (unless they were raised by wolves or live in a shed like the Unabomber) can immediately respond with "it must have been cold there in my shadow" when prompted by the world-famous notes of the intro of Wind Beneath My Wings.  Google Books returns the novel on which the film was based as the very first result. If that's not long-term significance, it's unclear if anything would have long-term significance in your view unless it operates on the geologic time scale. --Coolcaesar (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Most educated native English speakers would at least expect a DAB at "Beaches", everyone knows what the landform is while many man not have even heard of the film (I hadn't) and when I put beaches into Google Books all the results are for the landform. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Which reinforces my point that the article should be titled Beaches. --Coolcaesar (talk) 21:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 December 2020