lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Rottofreddo

message: -Battle Result-
According to the named source (http://www.zum.de/whkmla/region/italy/piemabs.html), it was an Austrian victory. This was als written in the German wikipedia article about the Italian campaign during the WoAS, and i also found the same conclusion about the battle in following source: "The modern part of An universal history, from the earliest accounts ..., Band 37" (https://books.google.at/books?id=MisIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA312&lpg=PA312&dq=Battle+of+Rottofreddo++1746&source=bl&ots=4vNHWo0obA&sig=IgdJ6Biabi4Y-Ai2hLIT0UeKhWw&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifwcOop_rRAhWJExoKHc5yBcg4ChDoAQg_MAc#v=onepage&q=Battle%20of%20Rottofreddo%20%201746&f=false) PNM (6.2.2017)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.89.105 (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Jüterbog

message: The only sources that I can find (other than Wikiopedia rip-offs) give this as another name for the Battle of Dennewitz on 6 September 1813.  I suspect his article is a hoax.  Mathsci appears to have reason to believe it took place in the 30 Years War -- was that a mistake, or is he in on the joke?  Holding Ray (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit above, and those to this article, seem to be  unhelpful; indeed it looks like trolling.  Mathsci (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to see that Mathsci was able to find a mention in a tertiary source.  I think that raises the article from the unverifiable to the merely non-notable.  Holding Ray (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: These remarks amount to little more than trolling. Mathsci (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax? 

message: There's not much in the way of sources on this. One paragraph at the most. Looks like a WP:PERMASTUB. It should be merged to a larger article, but I'm not sure which one. Tijfo098 (talk) 12:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct link is Battle of Dennewitz. Please take a little more care in future. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 12:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be merged?
Talk:Charlotte Country Day School

message: Per MOS:CIRC, we should generally avoid linking back to this page, and I see no reason to make an exception. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:1059:4164:8BD:E641 (talk) 19:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular linking
Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh

message: The POV in this article seems somewhat skewed but I don't know enough about him to change it. Lamjus 02:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How on earth is this POV to have Salameh's name in Hebrew as well as Arabic? Remember the conflict he was involved in... the Israeli-Arab one... remember the language they speak in Israel... Hebrew? Jamezcd 16:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop deleting Hebrew name 

message: It says here that he lived from 1940 to 1979. In the Qula article however, it says that he was born in 1943. Which is true? -- Ynhockey (Talk) 18:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's funny; an op-ed by the anonymous racist Elder of Ziyon as a reliable source!  Forget it.  This example of what tripe Algemeiner is prepared to publish shows again why Algemeiner should be taken with a huge grain of salt.  Ali Hassan was probably born in his father's village, which was Qula. You can find this in a few places, for example in this book. Zerotalk 03:04, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: Salameh was apparently assassinated because he was behind the Munich attack, yet the article says nothing about Munich. Can this omission be rectified.Royalcourtier (talk) 03:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munich 

message: I have inserted information about this man's father. Although the more complete description is on his father's page, a short description is relevant here. In particular, his fathers work for Germany in the early 1940s is relevant to Hassan Salameh growing up in Germany during this same time period.OtterAM (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Parentage
Talk:BSA

message: Wikipedia is in need of a "Black Student Association" (BSA) article. The BSA is an orgnaization run through many schools across the country (America) and deserves a reference article. 
Thank you
:Still a good idea, even if this page is not the most relevant place to offer the suggestion (I'll try to link to this somewhere). A search within Wikipedia shows the phrase turning up in several articles, maybe 40, and I'd be surprised if there aren't substantial sources about the phenomenon in general in the U.S. and its meaning and effect.
:(The original post was by an editor at IP 65.10.117.87 at 21:40, 10 January 2006, and was not edited until titled by another editor and retitled now.)
:Nick Levinson (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is such an article but under another title that I simply missed, then we at least need redirects (4 including plurals). And then, of course, this meaning of BSA should be added to this disambiguation page. Nick Levinson (talk) 16:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Student Association 

message: I would suggest adding an "in Technology" section on the BSA disambiguation page.  There are already a number of technology related acronyms.  Also I would suggest adding an article for Business Service Automation, which is software that is used to automate change and worflow in data centers.  Pack3406 (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest creating "in Technology" section 

message: Armies are organizations, albeit a special type of government agency. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging "Armies" (with only 1 entry anyway) into "Organizations" Section
Talk:Area Festival

message: I've redirected the two seasons of the Area Festival into this article; they didn't really have enough content to justify independent articles. --Madchester 02:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Paul Lennon

message: I made a couple of changes, the main one to update the article with the latest news on the Betfair scandal. I also removed the word 'genuine' from in front of 'working class background' as it seemed somewhat tautological, and changed the word 'pro-development' to 'pro-business'; I am not 100% happy in the last change, because I wanted to removed the implication that parties opposed to Lennon and the causes he supports are 'anti-development'. In doing so I may have created the impression they are 'anti-business', so if anyone can think of a more appropriate way to put it, please do.
I also changed the words 'strong defender' to 'vocal proponent', as I thought more neutral language was required. Gamsarah 02:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: Moved this here, as it's probably more apt on the Forestry Tas page, and isn't really about Lennon. --Jgritz 03:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Para from main article
Talk:Beechcraft Model 17 Staggerwing

message: In the section labeled "Specifications (Model D17S), the 3-view drawing is NOT a Beech Model D-17S (one of the most common & typical Stag models, and thus ideal choice for the Specifications). Instead, the drawing is of a comparatively rare, crude, early version -- the Beech Model 17R -- radically different from most Stag's. If such a non-typical model is the 3-view example, it should at least be clearly identified as such. So, in the code for the image, I replaced "frameless" with "thumb" so the caption shows, identifying the 3-view as a 17R.
Model 17R differences from Model D-17S (and from most other Stag models) include: Landing gear does NOT fully retract into the wing, but instead partially retracts into the huge, bulbous, draggy wheel pants & gear-leg fairing combination ("spats").  Landing gear is very narrow track, compared to later models. Flying wires attached to fixed portion of landing gear legs. Tailwheel shown not fully retracting. Engine is Wright, with long cowling reaching to windshield. Rudder is slightly different shape (and does some odd stuff). And so on.
~ Zxtxtxz (talk) 09:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-View Drawing does not match Specifications
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-01-09/In the news

message: I have added further information that the reporters may not have been aware of:
:In the article, the George Johnson noted that the birthdate for Hwang Woo-Suk birthdate was different between Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica, which was due to the fact that Wikipedia used the lunisolar Korean calendar which gave the date as 15 December, 1952 while the EB article used the Gregorian calendar, which uses the date 29 January, 1953. Soon after, a footnote was added to the article. In informed of this development through an email sent by Ta bu shi da yu, Mr Johnson responded that this was "interesting information indeed. It is fascinating the stories that unfold when one tries to chase down facts" and that his "admiration for the project continues to grow". 
Ta bu shi da yu 02:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dragonlance (weapon)

message: This picture, has an image of a knight whom I believe is carrying a lance. It may be useful.DoomsDay349 15:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the cover of the Annotated Chronicles. I am guessing it is a dragonlance. -- ReyBrujo 20:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of Lance
Talk:Freezepop

message: In interviews, members have stated that their music has appeared in the PBS show Arthur. Does anyone know what episode this happened and/or what song was played? This information can be added in the soundtrack apperances section. 
Source 1 (Reference starts at about 6:20): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfRXMl1QwSw
Source 2 http://www.freezepop.net/bios/band.html
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raocat22 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for the interview(s)?   Adrian[232] 15:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

text: And The Hills: !   Adrian[232] 02:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freezepop in Arthur 

message: The article incorrectly states that they have not preformed together since 2009 "His last show as a member of the band was at the Penny Arcade Expo 2009 in Seattle on September 5.[8]". However this is incorrect. The Freezepop bio on their website (https://www.freezepop.net/bio/) states "The Duke mostly-retired from the band and we brought Bananas Foster and Christmas Disco-Marie Sagan on board. (We do still occasionally play shows with The Duke, when we’re on the same coast.)"  Here is an article and a facebook event for one such performance in Rochester, NY https://www.rochestercitynewspaper.com/rochester/pop-freezepop/Content?oid=7174590; https://www.facebook.com/events/213062386155839/. Likeasummerrain (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preforming with The Duke of Pannekoeken
Talk:Greygem of Gargath

message: Perhaps this article should be merged into the List of Dragonlance artifacts article. DoomsDay349 02:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is, unless the stub is ready to be removed. DoomsDay349 02:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it could be merged there. There are some other articles like Dezra Majere that have even less information than this one, too, that should be merged in the character list. -- ReyBrujo 03:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Possible
Talk:Heroes of the Lance

message: Is it possible to perhaps take the article here and create a section under Heroes in the list of DL chars article called Heroes of the Lance, and then move the sections already there under that new section?  The idea is basically this:
==Heroes of the Lance==
===Appearing in Chronicles, Volume One===
Characters info, with subsubsection like this: =====Tanis Half-Elven=====
===Appearing in Chronicles, Volume Two===
Characters info, as above.
DoomsDay349 23:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It disappoints me that no one actually reads the books. Raistlin got the golden skin as an armor against Fist, not as a result of a secret pact. I'm changing it to reflect this. Andrew V. 17:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People have read the books; there's a ton of Dragonlance maintenance to do and few people to do it.  You're welcome to change it so long as it follows policy.  DoomsDay349 20:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry about that. It doesn't seem fair to say that. I was wrong anyways; I change it back. Andrew V. 15:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raistlin Majere
Wikipedia talk:Requests for investigation/Archives/2006/01 (2)

message: *  - The article has had its AfD tag removed multiple times. // James084 22:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pages 

message: *: a Stanford student named Matthew Warren Vassar keeps adding his vanity bio (grafting it onto the main entry) despite numerous warnings.  He has done this 32 times already, from numerous IP addresses. I think the only solution is to lock this page. --TrinityC 03:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2005

message: * -- personal attacks on Agent0042 and constant vandalism on Arthur (TV series) page with the "April" fanfic entry. Believed to be a sockpuppet of a few past warned users who also tried to put "April" into the guide. 
*:No recent major vandalism. // Mo0[talk] 17:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IP Addresses

message: *All P**fed Up - Asterisks are missing in actual name, which violates the no offensive user names policy. He has been asked to change it but has not yet responded. Contributions seem to be OK, They're albeit rather trivial ones that relate to Tintin books but they're not vandalism. Arno 05:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Registered users

message: *  Replacing U.S. state articles with F...CK YOU!! repeated quite a few times Macintosh User 00:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2005
Talk:Sinatra Doctrine

message: :The government of Hungary had opened its border with Austria in August 1989, dismantling the Iron Curtain on its border, and did nothing to prevent thousands of East Germans from fleeing to the West.
It reads as if the second part is still talking about Hungary. 
Suggested rewrite: "and the East German government (or the Soviet Union) did nothing to prevent thousands of people fleeing from East Germany to the West. --Singkong2005 02:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not quite what happened. I've rewritten that part of the article to make it clearer. -- ChrisO 23:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "By the late 1980s, structural flaws within the Soviet system, growing economic problems, the rise of anti-communist sentiment and the effects of the Soviet–Afghan War made it increasingly impractical for the Soviet Union to impose its will on its neighbors." Это не совсем правда,СССР начал разваливаться после начала перестройки и раздела общесоюзного и республиканского государственного и партийного имущества,в период распада ссср,чтобыло вызвано экономическими проблемами в 70-е и 80-е годы Цйфыву (talk) 19:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to clarify who flees from where

message: What, specifically, is in need of clean up for this article? Peter Grey 06:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Shevardnadze's speech and Gerasimov's memorable description of the new policy amounted to a rebuff of Honecker's appeals. The message was: "don't bother us with your problems, work them out yourselves." 71.80.205.14 (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valid commentary 

message: The National Review article that is given as the source of the claim that the phrase "Sinatra Doctrine" was coined in October 1989 itself makes no such claim. Nor should it; the phrase was coined in 1987 by Genadii Gerasimov.https://is.muni.cz/el/fss/podzim2010/MVZ182/J.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:5C0B:5B00:AC4F:FDB8:31A:BD34 (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "By the late 1980s, structural flaws within the Soviet system, growing economic problems, the rise of anti-communist sentiment and the effects of the Soviet–Afghan War made it increasingly impractical for the Soviet Union to impose its will on its neighbors". This is not entirely true, the USSR began to fall apart after the start of perestroika and the division of the all-union and republican state and party ownership, during the collapse of the USSR, which caused economic problems in the 70s and 80s Цйфыву (talk) 19:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not coined in 1989
Talk:Kendermore

message: I added a section of the above subject, but I am not entirely sure that I am correct on the Uncle Trapspringer bit. Go ahead and fix it up.
:I personally don't remember much from this book, try looking it up on dlnexus.com for any reviews or comments. Ddcc 04:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia and continuity errors
Talk:Krynn

message: I'm not sure on how to go about adding this referance, but here are some things the make the World notable.
*the upcoming movie , which will include stars such as Kiefer Sutherland and Lucy Lawless.
*Dragonlance Chronicles (Translation rights include Japan, France, Spain, Denmark, Italy, Germany, Finland, Israel, and Portugal. Bestsellers, New York Times, Locus, Walden and B. Dalton lists, Publishers Weekly.
*Dragonlance:  New York Times Best Seller May 22, 1988, October 4, 1987 , September 27, 1987 , JUNE 7, 1987 ,  November 2, 1986 
Roguebfl 11:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Evidence of notability

message: I have restored the notability template, on the grounds that this purely in universe article is incapable of providing evidence of notability, even if the in universe content were to be sourced from reliable secondary sources. The article would have to be rewritten from a real-world perspective and then sourced from reliable secondary sources to have any chance of meeting Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, Krynn is notable. No, the article does not demonstrate its notability. I say this because it passes the first two prongs at WP:FICT. The article certainly needs massive amounts of work; I think that  (subject may be notable but the article does not indicate that),  (needs more sources), and  would make sense, but not . That being said, having both Importance and Notability on the same article is redundent; one or the other makes sense, but not both. -Drilnoth (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur that this is a notable subject which has yet to prove its notability, thus why I changed the template to , although my changes were then reverted. BOZ (talk) 16:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability disputed
Talk:United States National Cemetery System

message: Do other countries have "National Cemeteries"?  If not, then this article should be called "National Cemetery" as that is the common name, and the term used by the National Cemetery Adminstration.  If noting the country really is needed, then perhaps using "National Cemetery (United States)", as this is more typical for disambig purposes. — Eoghanacht talk 19:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is "United States" necessary?

message: The cemetery template would be very useful on all the articles.  I used it on Calverton National Cemetery.  Americasroof (talk) 02:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template:Infobox_cemetery]]

message: There have been several new cemeteries built over the last few years that have still not been put into the list. I've tagged the article for needing updating. --Fbifriday (talk) 04:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have new info, please just add it.  See WP:Sofixit.  But when a tag demanding an update sits on the article page for 2 years, it looks like you are saying "YOU need to fix this, but it is not worth my time!" - i.e. pure graffiti.  Smallbones (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: In need of serious updating

message: At one point the article states:
"The authority to create military burial places came during the American Civil War, in an act passed by the U.S. Congress on July 17, 1862. By the end of 1862, 14 national cemeteries had been established."
At another:
"The first national cemeteries were set up after the United States Civil War by Edmund Burke Whitman. Congress passed a law to establish and protect national cemeteries in 1867."
These appear to be contradictory statements. Do "establish" and "set up" mean different things here? If so, that should be clarified. Did the 1867 law provide for establishing additional national cemeteries? It seems at least 14 were already in existence. Ishboyfay (talk) 20:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seemingly contradictory statements
Talk:T-Type

message: The T in T type did not mean turbo. Matter of fact, MOST of the t types werent turbo at all.  And Im very sure the skylark/somerset didnt get a turbo, OR a manual transmission.  they were luxury cars, not performance cars.  Though the skyhawk maybe.  And the GNX did not solidify the regal in nascar.  That timeline is opposite.  The regal had already been knee deep in nascar.  in fact, it was just the opposite.  By the time the gnx was being produced, the 81-87 g body regal was being phased out of nascar.
And I cant remember, but I thought the 't type' emblem always appeared together, until 87, where it was only the T by itself.  
And the regal somerset not only was NOT a 'downsized' regal (it IS a regal, only with an ugly two tone paint option) it didnt get any 't type treatment' as the somerset was ALREADY a package added onto a buick regal.  I believe maybe 82 it was?  
"introduced in 1982, became an instant success, and it inspired the company to extend its T-Type line to its other mid-size offering, "
Is wrong.  It was NOT an instant success.  In fact it was a huge dud lol.  And how could it inspire a company to extend its t type package to other cars, when the 82 grand national wasnt even a t type to begin with??  it was a regal with the GN package, not a t type regal.  In fact, there was not a single 't type' thing about it.  Just some points i felt i needed to highlight. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.17.173 (talk) 06:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yep, thats correct
Talk:David Thomas

message: Let's please add Dave Thomas, an editor of The Pragmatic Programmers book series.  (Not the same as David A. Thomas (software))
AlanH 03:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just removed (and corrected) the following text:
* David Thomas (scientist), Welsh scientist born in 1925
There is an article David Thomas (scientist), but it is not the same person – it's a redirect to David Thomas (geographer) – that's David S G Thomas, born 1958 in Kent.  So who is this one born 1925, and what kind of scientist is he?  Is there an article about him, and if not, does he deserve one?  He should not be David Thomas (scientist), as there are already several other scientists of various kinds.  --Richard New Forest (talk) 14:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: David Thomas, Welsh scientist
Talk:Abra-Catastrophe!/Archive 1

message: Does anyone know if this and the other FO films are flash animations?  Or, failing that, do they look pretty much like the series (which was flash-animated) or somewhat more advanced? Esn 21:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Flash

message: I know I already added this (DURING the episode in its ranking spot)but I can't write anything like an encyclopedia.
from, 70.104.134.101 11:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  lucky 7 

message: After Bippy changes the world so that the monkeys rule, doe3s it seem like the world resembles George Orwelle's  1984? Big Brother, the social divide (it appears that humans are the "proles")... Coincidence, or not? 68.102.253.212 (talk) 18:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1984 link 

message: * Stub_Med Article- This article is really short but very few details are written in this article.
* Im thinking of adding the wikify template to this article it is a short article
* If no one edits this article I will take matters in to my own hands and edit this article myself.Sprite7868 (talk) 07:50, 08 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  User Review