lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Poljot

message: USSR? = Russian: Украи́нская Сове́тская Социалисти́ческая Респу́блика, УССР =  The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic
 First Moscow Watch Factory (Russian: Первый Московский Часовой Завод, ПМЧЗ, Perviy Moskovskiy Chasovoy Zavod) = Not Ukrainian...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.39.173.62 (talk) 17:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

message: If Bob, an ex-employee of Microsoft, would create his own company, Wikipedia should not tolerate Bob's company to be mentioned as “Microsoft” in Wikipedia and Bob’s software’s as “Microsoft Office”.
Here is what we had in the “Poljot” Wikipedia article. That Volmax is almost Poljot, since it was founded by ex-employees from Poljot, and that their mechanisms are Poljot mechanisms.
Volmax IS NOT Pojot, and their mechanism are not “Poljot” mechanisms. The same for “Golden Poljot” they have nothing to do with Poljot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoine de Bottens (talk • contribs) 14:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Volmax, Golden Poljot etc... 

message: The company Poljot International claim to be the current owners of the Poljot brand and the direct owners of the former Soviet enterprise. 
Their web site is here: 
https://www.poljot-international.com/ 
They currently sells watches branded with the name Poljot.  Their about section contains the following information: 
The roots of the watch brand “Poljot-International” date back to the 1930s, when the “First State Watch Factory” was founded in Moscow. In 1961, after the flight of the first citizen of the earth, Yuri Gagarin, into space, the watches produced by the factory were given the designation “Poljot” (the flight).
In 1992, the watch distribution company “Poljot-V GmbH” was founded in Frankfurt am Main (Germany), in which a new watch brand “Poljot-International” was founded in 1994 under the leadership of its managing director, Alexander Shorokhov. The newly founded brand “Poljot-International” continued the Russian traditions of the “Poljot” brand on the one hand, but on the other hand followed a fundamentally different development path: the use of high-quality materials for watch making, the creation of independent contemporary design, high quality assembly work and strict and systematic quality control.
This is confusing and also common enough that it should be covered in the article. ZeroXero (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on the current Poljot International of Germany needed
Talk:Marianne vi Britannia

message: Created article, feel free to make it better. --Monstez 19:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page creation

message: It's not yet clear if Rollo is truly her son, or if he has any real blood relation to lelouch and his family whatsoever.  (Sunsetterxxx (talk) 01:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rollo
Talk:Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research

message: ...causing this article/file to get "mislabeled" (even "mislaid" perhaps, so that a search for "Gandhi" will not find it)
I have no idea how to *do* anything in a Wiki nor do I have time or desire to learn at this time.   Quite frankly, I miss (in the "toolbox" at the bottom left of the screen, maybe) a button/entry "bug/problem report"... which should trigger a little interactive program that takes the clueless web-surfer by the hand, so to say, to leave her feedback... WITHOUT having to dig into what makes Wikis tick!
my 2 cents worth...  though it probably never reaches anyone, has no effect or value.  oh well!  :-(
Sushmitnath 18:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just want to report a typo: you misspelled "Gandhi" as "Ghandi" here...
Talk:Deinococcota

message: I'm currently writing a paper on Deinococcales and it would appear that there is another genus within the Deinococcales order.  The microorganism is called Truepera radiovictrix and can be accessed by the RefSeq call number NC_014221.
Pjlmac (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is correct. However, for bacterial taxonomy the best resource is the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/), e.g. D-T phylum, microbiology in wikipedia is nowhere as good. --Squidonius (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway

message: On the Route Template Diagram - Greenhill station was located between Greenhill Lower Junction and the bridge carrying the E&G Railway over the Caledonaian Railway. Can you please amendSteamybrian2 (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Greenhill station

message: Map needs amending- South Queensferry branch should be extended to Port Edgar (closed 1890)Steamybrian2 (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Britmax (talk) 18:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Port Edgar
Talk:Thermus thermophilus

message: Cllgnc89 (talk) 20:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

message: Is it also known as Thermus flavus? Google showed this page as result but the page does not seem to mention the word "flavus", so I am unsure. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 05:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermus flavus 

message: The lead section provides a brief but accurate overview of the bacteria. However, it is not organized in a way that reflects each of the sections below. Additionally it provides information that is not detailed elsewhere in the article.
The content is relevant to the bacteria and its many uses. From a cursory glance over the article, all the information seems to be up to date as of 2024. In regard to the tone of the article, all of the information provided appears to be neutral and purely factual. It does not attempt to argue a certain position in any aspect. The sources range from 1974 to 2018, with the majority of them being around 1990-2010. They provide the context and the papers necessary to back up the claims in the article. Many of the links work.
The article is well-written but could stand to be more organized. There seems to be a lack of cohesion between the sections, which is a little jarring. There are a few spelling and grammar mistakes. The article does not include images of the bacteria or any other material covered in this article, such as a picture of the thermal vents that it can naturally be found in. The talk page is severely limited, with only two sections added to the talk page. It is rated as Start-class and is part of the Microbiology WikiProject at a mid-importance level.
Overall, this article has much work to be done on it. It has a good start to it, but stands to be developed more. Perhaps adding a morphology and metabolism section to the cell structure section could assist. The lead should be rewritten to better reflect the article. Spelling and grammar mistakes could be fixed, and pictures could be added. The addition of these elements would improve this article. 
Is there a certain way to recruit others to assist with this page? 
--Jkim777 (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation
Talk:Fort Breendonk

message: Uh, yeah, so there's been no references on this page since 2008? Lolz. Is it acceptable to use the Official Breendonk Memorial webpage as a reference? Tripnoted (talk) 06:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Compare this article to this webpage on Breedonk: .  The wikipedia page is word-for-word copied in many places.  What to do? OGBranniff (talk) 01:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violations
Talk:Somers Clarke

message: Mary Willett, nee Bagnall, 1850-1930, attributes the rebuilding (completed in 1872) of All Saints' Church, West Bromwich (the "old Church" of the borough) to his designs in "A History of West Bromwich" (1881) p 71.  She is reliable - her husband was the Vicar and her father a Churchwarden - she names the architect as Mr Somers Clarke jun, and gives his office as at 3 Delahay Street Westminster.  If so, this may have been his earliest major commissionDelahays (talk) 12:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Pediococcus

message: Who says Pediococcus is purely homofermentative? A quick googling will tell you there are a variety of primary metabolites including lactic, acetic and diacetyl. In general saying that anything is purely homofermentative is likely to be false.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.149.106.102 (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Pjetër Arbnori

message: May I know why "the neutrality of this article is disputed"?  Alenux 19:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article shows a clear bias in favor of Arbnori, a situation that is not acceptable in an encyclopedia that strives to be neutral in its coverage. —Sesel 19:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sesel, forgive my not being good at communicating for the time being. I am new at this. I don't know how to contact you from your own pages so I just hope you will be alerted to these messages or stop by here again, otherwise I'll have to seek editor assistance or something. 
What I'd like to point out is that on your page I found the link to the WIKI anti-bias project, and it says:
"In general, this project focuses on remedying omissions (either of entire topics, or of particular material within the potential scope of existing articles) rather than on either (1) protesting inappropriate inclusions or (2) trying to remedy issues of how material is presented."
To me it seems that just saying that "the article shows a clear bias in favor of Arbnori" to justify your branding it as biased goes against what the project professes NOT to aim at, i.e. remedying "how material is presented". Am I wrong?
I look forward to your response. Alenux Aug 13th '07
:I'm busy right now, so I'll look over the article later today, make changes if needed, and then remove the tag. "Systemic bias" (the page you visited) is different from "regular" bias. —Sesel 12:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-bias project
Talk:Legionella pneumophila

message: Legionella pneumophila seems to be the official name, but I occasionally see Legionella pneumophilia (including here). Which specific epithet the correct? 193.202.91.11 (talk) 15:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legionella pneumophila or pneumophilia 

message: — Assignment last updated by Njkleb (talk) 13:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIBO 3500 Introduction to Microbiology
Talk:Bifluoride

message: I noticed while reading this article that the second chemical equation under "Basicity", the one about most bifluorides being dissociated in solution, is unbalanced.  There are 2 fluorines on the left, but only 1 on the right.  Also, the charge is unbalanced, since the left has a net 1- charge, but the right has no net charge.  I don't know what the correct equation is, so I won't edit it yet, but it seems clear that it can't be correct at present.  Any ideas?
Skeletoroforange (talk) 04:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thank you. Plasmic Physics (talk) 08:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical Properties
Talk:Moraxella catarrhalis

message: Please see the sources recently added at talk:Otitis media. Several of them are good review sources that could be useful here. LeadSongDog come howl! 19:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review sources 

message: Moraxella catarrhalis is a fastidious, nonmotile, Gram-negative, aerobic, oxidase-positive diplococcus that can cause infections of the respiratory system, middle ear, eye, central nervous system, and joints of humans. It causes the infection of the host cell by sticking to the host cell using trimeric autotransporter adhesins. 14.241.239.112 (talk) 07:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y
Talk:Vangaveeti Mohana Ranga

message: Spouse listed, children, no reason to expect them all to be dead, if they were real.  I think the BLP tag should be restored but I am not doing it.  Does that unsourced information belong?  The "roped into" may also fall under BLP... the "roper" is not linked, and there is no reason to suppose death, AFAIK.Shajure (talk) 19:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You can, and probably should, follow the guidelines of BLP, as you say, there are living relatives to consider.  That is why removed, and not just tagged with a "citaton needed", all of the accusations of murder and similar. But the Blp template should not be used as it would be confusing to other editors. The unref template is sufficient. I think blank ref sections are very useful, as they result in less experienced editors immediately seeing their refs if they add them, but don't add a reflist line. 23:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP, other thoughts 

message: thumbnail  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.133.58.75 (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  vangaveeti mohana ranga died
Talk:Hyphomicrobiales

message: is also an important member of the group --ArazZeynili (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  brucella 

message: Two taxa as outgroup(s), and with a common ancestor on same level as Meganema and the rest of Rhizobiales looks very strange (this outgroup isn't really an outgroup per current design of the cladogram). Moreover, AFAIK Sphingomonas belongs in fact to Caulobacteridae, but Magnetospirillum  doesn't. Because of the basal position of Magnetospirillum inside Alphaproteobacteriae, the last common acestor of Magnetospirillum and Sphingomonas is also an ancestor of all Caulobacteridae (including Rhizobiales) and of all Alphaproteobacteria. So how can it be corrected? --Ernsts (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outgroup position
Talk:Usherette (Rocky Horror)

message: :::::—Anthøny 19:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Desulfobacterales

message: Reducing sulfates to sulfides does not give you energy!!! This is wrong! --kupirijo (talk) 05:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  energy source? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kmvsetecka (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Ecology
Talk:Straight-chain terminal alkene

message: In this article it is mentioned that linear internal olefins make a better drilling mud fluid than linear alpha olefins.  Where can I find out more on this ? 72.48.190.255 19:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Xanthomonas

message: Does anyone know where is this paper in reference available : 'Dowson, W.J. (1939). "On the systematic position and generic names of the Gram-negative bacterial plant pathogens". Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene.: 177–193.'  ? I've looked everywhere, does anyone know if there is a library where it's available? Wikidoom (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Enterobacteriaceae

message: Is Stenotrophomonas maltophilia a member of Enterobacteriaceae as the article states? I don't think so.--Miguelferig (talk) 17:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was worded poorly, but what bugs me more is the lack of purpose of the paragraph. --Squidonius (talk) 23:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae are a better example because they are carbapenem resistant and they are Enterobacteriaceae. This article is about Enterobacteriaceae not about related families of gammaproteobacteria. This reference/information is from  CDC and it says: "Increasingly, Klebsiella bacteria have developed antimicrobial resistance, most recently to the class of antibiotics known as carbapenems."--Miguelferig (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Definetely, I am still confused why only carbapenem is mentioned in a section called antibiotic resistance, though. Feel free to edit or even utterly rewrite it. --Squidonius (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Antibiotic resistence

message: not in the  IPA form, but plain english like phonetic: fuh-NET-ik
 
173.61.96.10 (talk) 22:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: pronunciation of enterobacteriaceae
Talk:Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo

message: While the article is small, I would class it as start rather than stub.  Also, I think the cleanup flag can be safely removed, as it has no notes on the talk page with specifics, and the broad issues (it was mostly 2 lists plus some advertising, with some useful infobits).  I'll try to remember to revisit and kill the flags if there is no objection.Unfriend14 (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Per my note, dropped the cleanup.  On review, while the article might be classed "start", I hope the "stub" tag will draw potential editors, so I leave it in place.Unfriend14 (talk) 03:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing 
2 flag changes
 just one change - done
Talk:Fiona Glenanne

message: Several sentences in this article are copyvio from the official series website. Just a friendly warning to anyone watchlisting this before an admin comes along and either deletes the article or plants a big copyvio notice on it. 68.146.47.196 19:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: In the episode Hard Bargain, Fiona used a small dog to pose as a wealthy trophy wife. And now I read in Fiona's blog that at one point she kidnapped a dog. Is it possible this is connected?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytoabn (talk • contribs) 22:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Dog

message: We should mention that her accent in the pilot was Irish and she had no accent in the later episodes.  I'm not sure when she stopped using the accent though. Itsmeiam 01:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She said in the second episode that she "couldn't go around Miami talking like a frickin' leprechaun." I disagree with the assertion that she has an American accent, however. She sounds distinctly English to me. Axeman (talk) 04:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Accent

message: The site notes that she parted from the IRA because she didn't want to be told what to do. I seem to recall that she broke all ties when the IRA wanted to bomb a school bus and she didn't want to hurt children.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.255.236.205 (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parting w/the IRA 

message: There's no proof that Michael and Fiona got married at the end of the series.  We only see them in the cabin with Charlie across Michael's lap.  That is, unless I missed some sort of very obvious wedding band on their fingers or something. THE evil fluffyface (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Series finale
Talk:Plesiomonas shigelloides

message: doi:10.1128/CMR.00103-15 JFW | T@lk 22:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: — Assignment last updated by NicoMun (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing C1
Talk:Klebsiella

message: Reference 2 does not say that Klebsiella causes ankylosing spondylitis as AS is an autoimmune disease.
Tlj23 23:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think this article is relevant and information from it should be added to the wiki: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/08/22/4748386/superbug-outbreak-in-us-research.html 68.198.104.107 (talk) 02:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Superbug
Talk:Escherichia

message: Where are the other Escherichia species articles? Just because we all have heard of Escherichia coli does not necessarily mean we only want to know about it. Can someone please make them? Even the article says Escherichia coli is not the only Escherichia capable of being a pathogen.
☻wilted☻rose☻dying☻rose☻ 16:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Escherichia 

message: The Taxon Bacteria is a domain, not merely a kingdom. Taxonomists are still debating how to group the 16+ phyla within the Domain Bacteria into kingdoms, but personally something tells me that a Kingdom Gramaffirmata (Gram Positive) and a Kingdom Gramminime (Gram Negative) would be likely to be monophyletic. (A different basic structure of walls and membranes is likely to evolve just once in a biosphere, being a very prominent feature on a unicellular organism.) In any case, I corrected the rank listed in the article. -The Mysterious El Willstro 71.173.60.135 (talk) 04:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 
Talk:Northwestern Medicine McHenry Hospital

message: The original version of this article was taken in its entirely, excepting the infobox, from  and other pages on the same site. Rather than speedily deleting it under CSD:G12, I've made it a one-sentence stub with the hope that it can be developed as an original article. --MCB 19:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed copyvios
Talk:Shewanella

message: 'Nanotube-producing bacteria show manufacturing promise' --Emesee (talk) 21:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The last sentence of the first paragraph only contains a subject. I don't know what the verb or object is intended to be, so I can't fix it. Perhaps it's supposed to be a caption for an image? Ludist (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete sentence

message: This sentence was included in the article:
:Shewanella appeared in a comic book as "Shewy, the Electric Bacterium" in educational kits available for students and hobbyists.MudWatt Science Kit
The reference seems to go to the publisher, so is a bit advertisey. OTOH, explicitly scientific educational comics about bacteria might be so rare as to be worthy of note. More information (sources) probably needed in this case. Feel free to chime in with opinions. (PS: The link currently actually goes here.)
Cheers,
Samsara 13:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science education comic - worth the mention? 

message: To add to article: the origin of the genus and species name. 76.189.141.37 (talk) 00:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Nitrosomonas

message: Hi everyone, we are five students of University Federico II in Naples. We are working for our course assignement https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/campaigns/microbiology_teaching_in_italy/programs , and we would like to improve this article adding information about Ecology, Morphology,  Metabolism and Genetics. --BabboNatale0096 (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

message: Even though it's a short stub, it's still wrong. Nitrosomonas convert AMMONIA (NH3), not AMMONIUM (NH4+).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.125.34.176 (talk) 22:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ammonia, not ammonium 

message: The sixth paragraph make a claim about degrading halogenated compounds and then gives three examples, one of which is benzene.  
Benzene only has carbon and hydrogen, neither of which is a halogen, thus benzene is not a halogenated compound.
70.171.47.39 (talk) 22:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, benzene is not halogenated.  That sentence is taken directly from the cited reference.  So the error originated elsewhere.  I wonder if it was meant to be chlorobenzene rather than benzene.  ChemNerd (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benzene is not a halogenated compound. 

message: Sources on this page are very weak. The first source, microbewiki, cites Wikipedia as a source. Pretty sure you can't have two things referencing each other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.153.19 (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing