lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inocencio of Mary Immaculate

message: How come this gentleman is classed as a Martyr of the Spanish Civil War when the civil war took another 2 years to break out? Additionally, in the MARTYRDOM section of the article, it is said that "On Friday October 5th 1934, a group of rebels forced their way into the Brothers' school in Turón." I don't quite understand. What "rebels" is it refering to? Cheers! :) Dr Benway 14:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi there :). I understand the relatiosnship, but where is this man officially beatified as a "martyr of the Spanish Civil War"? As far as I know, the martyrs of the spanish civil war were beatified in March 2001 and October 2007 specifically by the Vatican, no? Dr Benway (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please see this link for confirmation;  Matthewafallen (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the link, but I meant something a bit more "official". Vatican source, f.eg. I'll be looking into it too as soon as I have a bit of time. Cheers ;) Dr Benway (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yup, checked in the Vatican webpage. Despite the fact he isn't officially a "martyr of ths Spanish Civil War" the whole wording around his bio definately puts him into that category, and quickly associates him to the civil war and the posterior "religious prosecution" by the Republican government. *nodnods* Nothing more to add ;) Dr Benway (talk) 16:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Martyr
Talk:Anatomy Act 1832

message: Just going to add on a little information to the background section :)
The Act originally tried to get passed in 1828 but it failed. Herbert Mayo, a Fellow of the Royal Society and a successful neuro-anatomist, tried very hard to convince the government to reconsider passing the Anatomy Act after learning of a murder of an italian boy. His determination eventually lead to the Anatomy Act of 1832. <ref>http://www.intriguing-history.com/anatomy-act-1832//ref>
BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mooney Acclaim

message: Isn't the top speed 237kt as opposed to 242kt? Mooney certainly claimed it was a few months ago...
::Not any more, as the ref already on that paragraph shows. 
- Ahunt 17:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Top Speed

message: Why is the MTOW listed as being virtually the same as the empty weight?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.217.252 (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch - it was just a mistake - fixed! - Ahunt (talk) 13:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gross Weight

message: This article is still pretty short and there doesn't seem to be a big risk of it getting much longer. Since the M20TN is part of the M20 family of aircraft, I am not convinced it should remain as a separate article.
Now that the Mooney M20 article is better organized, I have been considering whether this article should be rolled back into that one. I would like to hear any objections to this idea from other editors. - Ahunt (talk) 18:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur that it should be merged. There's more than enough room now. - BillCJ (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree merge into M20. MilborneOne (talk) 22:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the support for this move - work completed! - Ahunt (talk) 11:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this article be combined into the [[Mooney M20]] article?
Talk:Emidio Recchioni

message: To what is said in the article it has to be added, too, that the amount of the money given by the Court to Recchioni cannot be compared to what he lost in this affair, which was for him a ruin (considering that his shop in Soho was selling expensive goods to rich and usually pro-fascist customers).
Luc Nemeth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.50.138.14 (talk • contribs) 
:If you think the article is deficient, feel free to fix it, but be sure to add references to reliable sources when doing so. Please read also: WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV. Sandstein 15:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia has its own definition of reliable sources; please read the page WP:RS. Currently, the article refers to http://www.iisg.nl/archives/nl/files/r/10767583full.php as a source, but I agree with you that it could use more sources. Sandstein 19:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I  can't really argue with you on the merits because I do not understand what you are trying to say - what exactly is wrong in the article? Again, if you think the article is deficient, you are free to edit it, and in particular to remove any content that is not supported by reliable sources. If you add content, though, you should provide reliable sources for it. I'll note also that the original author of much of what is now this article was User:Clio the Muse, one of our most respected editors on historical topics. If you would like to know what sources the article is based on, you might want to ask her on her talk page. Sandstein 14:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Mr Nemeth, Wikipedia looks dimly on threats. If you think this article is wrong, please just edit it so as to make it right. If you think the article is irremediably bad, there is a process you can follow to propose its deletion, and the community of Wikipedia editors will decide about it. Please read the instructions in WP:AFD. Sandstein 16:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  'threats'! All it seems to me is that Mr Nemeth is complaining about the quality of source for this article: hardly a novel position. Why not have the article be flagged 'disputed' and 'allegedly' inserted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.105.127.56 (talk) 11:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to do so. You can, for instance, insert the  tag at the top of the article. Sandstein 16:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Once More to the Lake

message: The inclusion of the full essay, a biographical essay seem dubious on copyright/fair use grounds. Who is the analysis by and why is it included? I suggest removal of most/all of this and totally redoing the entry. Kasyapa (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it's quite unnecessary given the presence of an article on the author and the Wikisource archive. Roscelese (talk) 03:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright / relevance issues
Talk:Scandosorbus intermedia

message: References need updating--GRM (talk) 10:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 05:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorbus intermedia →  – discussed here Carnby (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 August 2023
Talk:Texas Eagle/Archive

message: While the 'White House confusion' section describing an exchange between a Texas constituent and vice-president Al Gore may be technically correct, this section seems totally out of context with regard to the page on the Texas Eagle train.  I do not think that this section belongs in the article, but would not remove a factually correct (though essentially unrelated) paragraph based on my own bias.  Do others feel that the Gore/Texas Eagle exchange rises to the level of being a useful part of the page, or should it be relegated to some political discussion page related to Al Gore?   RI-Bill 05:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The renamed "Political hurdles" section seems to exist only to describe an amusing response from from V.P. Al Gore's office, where he thinks the writer's mention of "Texas Eagle" refers to a bird. This is a joke at beast and crass political partisanism at worst - neither belongs in Wikipedia. Wikipedia should describe the politics, not fall victim to it.  I suggest deleting this entire section, as there appears to be no "meat" here. 
--Harpwolf 23:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Response
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Characters of Lufia: The Legend Returns

message: *You're going to keep the same thing on there as you put on the article weeks ago?  There are other users who did small bits of work on that page after I posted my appeal for more time, so I assumed that the issue was solved while I was away from the page.  Those people seem to think that it should stay, or else they wouldn't have edited it.  You can go ahead and get rid of it if you want; I've copied the information from the page and can put up the relevant bits into the game's regular page at any time.  I don't think the information is harmful spurious; I think it's actually useful, and is much better than what the page was before I started working on it months ago.  I just wish other people would put their two cents in.--Fuen Fuboo 02:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of premiers of British Columbia by time in office

message: It appears that the merger of this list with List of premiers of British Columbia, outcome of the 2007 AfD, was never done.  Should this a) be taken back to AfD, b) merged 17 years after the original outcome, c) ignored or d) taken somewhere else?  Thanks for your input. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ignore the AfD, leave this page as it is. It is silly to insist the AfD be implemented now, 17 years later, when a) it was, evidently, promptly ignored; b) seemingly nobody has ever raised an objection to this page's continued existence in the meantime; c) plenty of other pages for subnational leaders have been created in the time since. There is clearly, obviously an implied consensus that these lists should exist, and if that's to be challenged, then it ought to be raised about them as a whole rather than any individual list. — Kawnhr (talk) 06:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge outcome of 2007 AfD was never done - correct?
Talk:Box (cricket)

message: re:
I don't think Jockstrap is the correct place to merge Box (cricket), beyond the sentence that already exists. Would suggest perhaps merging into a general article about Cricket equipment if it must be merged at all.  Markhh (talk) 08:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge into Cricket clothing and equipment completed. All of the small amount of information here was already duplicated on that page, including the photo, so no actual data had to be moved.  Markhh (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggested merge
Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Mary Wollstonecraft

message: "Mary Wollstonecraft" includes articles on the major works of Mary Wollstonecraft and, potentially, the major people in her life.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awadewit (talk • contribs) 22:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Working definition

message: This topic meets current criteria, and exceeds them being all FAs.  --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 15:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vital improvements
Talk:Hotel Chocolat

message: This is not a Wikipedia article it is a blatant piece of sales blurb, almost certainly written by someone from the company.  As no one has been able to edit it into a neutral entry in nearly seven years, surely it is about time it was deleted?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.183.197 (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely if this article has been up for 7 years and no-one else has objected, it should be retained as a useful piece of information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magerius (talk • contribs) 18:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a first round of re-writing and adding new content and sources. Tec Tom (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement, not article - should be deleted
Talk:Number coding in Metro Manila

message: As no one refers to the number coding scheme as the "Uniform Vehicular Volume Reduction Program" or even as the "UVVRP"? –HTD 08:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This is not the WP:CommonName.--121.54.54.33 (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move back to number coding? 

message: Have there been any students or reports on whether color coding has had any effect whatsoever on traffic? --121.54.54.33 (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Any studies or reports on the effect of this?

message: As of 2019, the number coding ordinance in Cavite have implemented, thus it has to be included also the following cities and municipalities affected by it:
* Bacoor
* Carmona
* Dasmarinas
* General Mariano Alvarez
* General Trias
* Imus
* Trece Martires
Hopefully, more discussions and replies will be applied here on this talk.
Cheers! -DEARPAUL24 (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cavite UVVRP Ordinance
Talk:National Youth Choir of Scotland

message: Why is National Youth Choir of Scotland in the Catagory of liberal democracies? I mean how is that catagory appearing at the bottom of the NYCofScotland page? I couldn't find anything in the source script for the page. Amit@Talk 16:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I found the reason, thanks anyway Amit@Talk 16:06, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category question

message: Why does the page of bodybuilder and filmaker Christopher Bell gets redirected here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.38.210.221 (talk) 14:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Bell? 

message: It's the same organisation. Same website. I know, I sing for them! DeMoN2009 20:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[NYCoS]] 

message: It has been proposed since April 2015 that National Boys Choir be merged into National Youth Choir of Scotland (the proposer didn't tag this page or set up a discussion). It looks like National Boys Choir doesn't have much info (and no references), so I would support the merge. Thoughts? Ajpolino (talk) 02:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and merged as uncontroversial. Ajpolino (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Lwów subdialect

message: BTW, now that we're in linguistic society here, do you have any idea how to classify this dialect? In all publications it's named simply a dialect, without any details. Above one of you called it an sociolect, while I always thought of it as an ethnolect. Any ideas? //Halibutt 18:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what I thought... //Halibutt 16:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialect 

message: Hi! I'm from east of Poland (województwo Podkarpackie, powiat Lubaczowski). We speak here in polish, but we have some "our" words. There is no difference in grammar (just some plural forms we do by something like sound between "i" and "e").
I think, that it isn't "Lwów dialect", but dialect of "kresy". I hope, that it isn't going do extinct :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.11.164.189 (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: ===============================
Talk:Hedlundia hybrida

message: The common names here need attention from an expert. It seems that oakleaf mountain ash and Swedish service tree are used for this species, but Finnish whitebeam seems more common in scholarly literature. Perhaps there are misidentifications or differences in circumscription with S. thuringiaca and S. intermedia. Citations are needed here. Nadiatalent (talk) 13:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common names problem
Talk:New Ghostbusters II

message: Could somebody please change the title from "New Ghostbusters 2" to "New Ghostbusters II"?  I'd do it myself, if I knew how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.218.9.176 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Can someone change the dumbass text about how neither version contains multiplayer to reflect the paragraph above it which speaks of the multiplayer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2d80:8010:8a7c:1dbf:69bd:5f26:39c4 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiplayer
Talk:Daily Record (New Jersey)

message: Added the Library of Congress ref and other info to Infobox.   This is probably just a stub as it stands.  
 20:16, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontroversial. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Daily Record (Morris County, New Jersey) →  – Newspaper is located in nearby Parsippany. Requested name is currently a redirect. Tinton5 (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Support, it clearly doesn't need the county name in the title Stan traynor (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 June 2022
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Lansing

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Louis Berger Group

message: Is this not the same firm responsible for the deadly FIU pedestrian bridge collapse? If so maybe that's worth mentioning. 162.196.254.96 (talk) 07:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIU collapsed bridge
Talk:Nyeri County

message: Found a possible resource for an education section http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v6(8)/Version-2/I0608027286.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education paper
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Gaylord

message: Bishop-elect Raica was named the new Bishop of Gaylord today. His consecration is set for 28 Aug.--Dcheney (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bp Raica 

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Betsie ten Boom

message: Not sure how to edit stuff on right column the date of death is 1994 instead of 1944.  Can someone fix it? 
Mateck (talk) 02:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date incorrect

message: She was born 1895 and died 1944, that makes her 49 (or 48) years old when she died.  How could it then be stated that she was 59?  One of the numbers must be wrong! KMA "HF" N 16:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote the Corrie ten Boom museum for her exact dates. Czolgolz 19:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; I made a typo. She was 59 when she died, accoring to her sister Corrie. The correct dates are 1885-1944. Thanks :) I'll fix it. OnFire4Jesus 04:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates?

message: Would we really state her cause of death as anemia?  I'd really think it was from malnutrition and abuse in the concentration camp. Czolgolz (talk) 17:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thought of that, but after spending six months studying her condition, I found that all medical resources agreed that pernicious anemia, if gone untreated in an advanced stage, such as Betsie's, one can die of it very quickly. And of course, the abuse and malnutrition, starvation, exhaustion was a large part. (OnFire4Jesus (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death
Talk:Siemens Hearing Instruments

message: This affiliate company of Sivantos is not notable on its own to have an article. Sociable Song (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Sivantos has now merged and it part of WS Audiology; the page is now merged there and so I don't think that further action is warranted. Klbrain (talk) 09:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Saginaw

message: As of July 2021, this article was modified to eliminate the nondescript term "Roman Catholic" in favor of the more precise distinction of "Latin Church" (the sui iuris church) and "Catholic Church" (the denomination). If you believe this edit to be in error or improper, please make the relevant reversion and open discussion on this talk page or my personal talk page. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2021 Latin Church revision
Talk:Spruce Run Recreation Area

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:New Jersey stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
1.)	You do not have a reference after each individual sentence.  However, you do have a citation at the end of each paragraph in your edit, which is exactly what I did with mine.  I assume that everything within that paragraph came from the source listed at the end of it.
2.)	The language throughout your edit is definitely neutral.  It is well-written throughout and filled with facts about your subject matter.
3.)	I found no statements that were opinionated in any way when reading your edit.  Everything seemed to be factual and directly from the sources you listed. 
Good Job Alexander on your edits!  However, it looks like you made some edits for three different Wikipedia pages.  For this assignment, we were supposed to have picked one page and make a 300 word edit with 6 references.  Maybe you can pick one of your choices and just expand it into further detail once you find a few more sources.
Hollyferet (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Wicked Winter Renaissance Faire

message: This page should probably be deleted. Self-promotion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOwlHerself (talk • contribs) 19:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "Self promotion!" Exclaims the person posting links to their own blog. Centerone (talk) 23:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Neither of those are RS, and once again, "self promotion!" Centerone (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page should be deleted
Talk:AtlantiCare

message: This article seems to be about the regional healthcare system in general, yet has an infobox for the flagship hospital campus specifically. There already exists a separate page for the other hospital campus, as the hatnote indicates. I am not sure these topics warrant 3 separate pages, but regardless, the current situation is untenable and needs to be rectified somehow. I suppose an alternative to splitting is to move this page to the hospital name and discuss the most important aspects of the health system in general on that page. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-10-29/WikiWorld

message: "Pückler-Muskae" [sic] is surely Hermann von Pückler-Muskau, no? I have fixed it in the article. -- !! ?? 16:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the information. I'm unfamiliar with Pückler-Muskae/Muskau, and wouldn't have picked up on the error. I'll correct his name in the comic and re-post it. --Greg Williams 01:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the feedback. I've tightened things up, and I think it works better. --Greg Williams 12:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)