Talk:Genetic erosion

message: envrionment.blogspot.com/2008/10/genetic-erosion.html
This page, which turned up in one of my alerts, rang a bell. It is a direct steal from here. There's probably nothing that can be done, but I thought I would draw attention to it. I'd prefer not linking to it because there is no point giving the page any credibility, but I don't how to switch automatic linking off. Maybe someone else can do that?
JeremyCherfas (talk) 12:44, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No idea what the policy is on plagiarizing Wikipedia

message: If these references go back into the article they need to be formatted to be more readable and remove redundant info. Emails and addresses for authors are not required. David D. (Talk) 04:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This comment still stands.  i see you put them all back in without making any changes. David D. (Talk) 22:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: references section for convenience

message: So you're just going to revert without any comment? David D. (Talk) 14:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you kindly stop stalking me on wikipedia and read WP:STALKING and stop removing mass text from articles I have contributed on your whims and fancies, I request you to kindly do random editing and contributions on wikipedia articles that genuinly interest you, not stalk my articles like you have been doing since last many months.
-- Atulsnischal (talk) 21:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent revert

message: Maybe the best thing is to just merge this with the Inbreeding article?  Apart from the reference format it is a model article of this topic. Is there any good reason why this should not be a redirect to that page? David D. (Talk) 22:21, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The following text copied from User talk:Atulsnischal by User:Atulsnischal.  User David D. wrote:
:::"So by changing the title of this topic and the subsequent removal of the dialog is your way of informing us you are unwilling to discuss any on the content you have inserted into mulitple articles? Your input would be welcome but not necessary."
The following text also copied from User talk:Atulsnischal by User:Atulsnischal.
:: Listen I have Archived our previous conversation - it is in my talk page Archives , your edits are based on and motivated with WP:STALKING me on Wikipedia which you have been doing since the last year or so, outcome can not be healthy and I dont want to argue with you. Please do not go to my contributions page for following me from there to articles I have been working on, that is called stalking. Please dont get into ego clashes and personality clashes with people, just find articles randomly for contributing.
::Hope it makes sense, also I did inform that I am busy with other stuff in life.
::Best wishes, hope you will leave me alone. Atulsnischal (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:STALKING]]

message: Exactly why is the parenthetical phrase present in "commercial varieties (including GMOs)" in the section "Genetic erosion in agricultural and livestock biodiversity"? That some varieties have been modified with modern techniques appears to be irrelevant. Allens (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no response, I have removed this material (and the link to "genetic pollution") as irrelevant. Allens (talk) 06:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why mention organisms modified with modern genetics? 

message: If genetic erosion is a matter of decreased genetic diversity, as stated by the lead, then it is inappropriate to mention measures that decrease genetic diversity - by avoiding the entry of new genes - as actions in counter to it, as in "Zoos... safeguard against inbreeding and hybrids which are considered genetically compromised thus not fit for reintroduction in the wild and in the case of unnaturally found hybrids also to guard against genetic pollution in naturally evolved, region specific, pure wild stocks" in the section "Ex-Situ Conservation"; of the named actions, only safeguarding against inbreeding is a way of preventing genetic erosion. Allens (talk) 03:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no response, I have removed this material not related to genetic erosion. Allens (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Genetic pollution" increases genetic diversity 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Genetic erosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012100006/http://lynx.uio.no/jon/lynx/obrien-e.htm to http://lynx.uio.no/jon/lynx/obrien-e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I stepped on the "genetic depletion" term in the CRISPR page. I didn't find a wikipedia page about it but the uses in papers (example) seem to be synonymous to "genetic erosion". Can somebody approve my recent change that adds "depletion" as a synonym? Then I can add links from the pages like CRISPR. Another question is whether a new redirection page "Genetic depletion" should be created. Cheater no1 (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonym of "genetic depletion"?