Talk:Valleywag

message: Um, a not-notable blog? If you kill the entry for Valleywag, can you please also be sure to kill the entries for these non-notable print counterparts:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Enquirer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OK%21_magazine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hello_Magazine
just to name a few.
--agreed, this article should be kept.
:Keep. --Nick Douglas 21:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from 2006

message: We're going to do this article "by the book", aren't we? Nothing else is to be tolerated. We don't play games with encyclopedia content no matter how big of a stick the subject of an article has poked us with. Lawrence Cohen § t/e 22:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lawrence, I respect you, but I find the suggestion I would do anything but by the book to be unfair.  The criticism section I drafted is completely sourced, and the lead drew from the sources found in the body.  I simply had not transposed the refs up top.  The body that is unsourced was not written by me.  --David Shankbone 23:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I love you too, David, and it wasn't directed at you specifically. Some users here have a habit of attacking criticizers via article space. I just wanted to put folks on notice, is all. Lawrence Cohen § t/e 23:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  by the book 

message: I just corrected that material in the article. Thank you. --70.109.223.188 (talk) 13:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did you do that. Thanks, SqueakBox 14:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is why he is notable. Why do you want to remove the fact that he is co-founder from every article that he is mentioned in? --70.109.223.188 (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wales as co-founder of Wikipedia

message: The Valleywag blog has now been moved to valleywag.gawker.com and is no longer a stand-alone site. Does this mean that we should integrate this information into the Gawker entry?--Cartman005 (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest leaving it here (there's an infobox status that acknowledges a website is now defunct). I did a partial update to reflect this, but more work needs to be done.  68.165.77.223 (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Page?

message: The Valleywag URL now redirects to the Gawker main page, which makes no reference to Valleywag.  Is Valleywag now defunct?  If so, the article should be revised into the past tense. Circumspect (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Valleywag Defunct?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Valleywag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080314140514/http://valleywag.com:80/tech/housekeeping/valleywag-release-candidate-2-214343.php to http://valleywag.com/tech/housekeeping/valleywag-release-candidate-2-214343.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified