lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Channa micropeltes

message: Pktlaurence (talk) has recently made re-submitted two unexplained changes without any further explanation that appear to be unhelpful. I request that this editor explain his actions and why he thinks his edits are an improvement Jameel the Saluki (talk) 04:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  As food, and as invasive
Talk:HERMES experiment

message: While Marasmusine is right — the current article does read like original research — I'm getting 92 hits on Google for:
:hermes +"HERA accelerator" +"DESY laboratory"
They're informative hits from legitimate domains; so instead of deleting this article, we should be able to easily change the tone and add proper sources and citations. Cribcage 10:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Edits for correctness and consistency with the DESY main article. Adaptation to wording used for other experiments at HERA (“particle detector” instead of “experiment” and corrections of minor mistakes. The proposed changes are underlined.
 Redactrice at DESY (talk) 16:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done:  Implemented save where unreferenced. Happy holidays! PK650 (talk) 02:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @PK650 Belated thanks! I have added two references in the proposed text below - one for the detector dimensions, one for the research method. Could you have a look? Thanks! Redactrice at DESY (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

text: I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble finding the relevant sections? I'm happy to do this one, but might be time-bound for your other article requests. PK650 (talk) 05:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit suggestions 

message: :Category:Particle experiments
 
Redactrice at DESY (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: —Quondum 13:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:A1090 road

message: Speedy has been added between redirect being created and new page being saved - about 1 minute!  Regan123 11:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the speedy tag because it was invalid. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 13:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Regan123 13:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Delete
Category talk:Australian musical groups

message: anyone feel like categorising by city as well? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.1.1 (talk • contribs).
: I think categorising by state would be better. I'll might do it later on, but if someone else want to start, go ahead. - kollision 10:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I might start adding musical groups from WA....... RaNdOm26 08:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have now created :Category:Australian musical groups by state and categories for all 8 states. - kollision 11:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: by city
Talk:Back-rank checkmate

message: This article does not seem to be displaying  correctly.  Oddly enough, it works when I preview the document; but when I make the edit, it screws up.  I have tested this multiple times; to see, just click edit, then without changing anything, go to preview -- the page appears nicely.  The formatting I have it in now is not perfect, but it is better than before: I placed the two images at the top into a table so they didn't make a huge whitespace in the article, and I have used  in the Introduction section because if you use it before it screws up the location of the article's contents.  If anyone can seem to get rid of the odd floating edit which appears to float from nowhere, it would be appreciated. Peace and Passion (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The clear needs to go before the next section title.  I changed it.  Bubba73 (if u cn rd ths u cn go to my talk page), 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's better to have it higher, then you don't have horrible whitespace and a floating table of contents issue, even though you have a cut off line. Peace and Passion (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

text: (I moved  out of the "Introduction" title line, as it was before ==Introduction== it looked nicer, but it caused the floating edit-box issue.  Now it's in Introduction section, the best compromise I could come up with that worked on Firefox and IE. Peace and Passion (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue with <nowiki>{{clear}}</nowiki> 

message: In this position as described in the article, White supposedly wins with 1.Qxc6. However after 1...g6! Black wins back the bishop by utilizing a Skewer, as he threatens the queen for real now. Perhaps place a White pawn on h5 so that ...g6 is met by h6. After 1.Qxc6 g6 2.Qb7 it seems White holds the bishop since the c8-rook must defend the a8-rook, but then 2...Rab8 would win the bishop also.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then let's try the defense 1...b5, covering d8 with the queen. Then what can White do?Jasper Deng (talk) 06:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Let's add it to the article.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

text: Then however, ...h6 is a viable defense.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:29, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

text: AgreedJasper Deng (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First example is incorrect 

message: The first diagram should stick to what the source says.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 23:29, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) It is taken directly from the source - it is good to stick with what the source says.  (2) As was explained to you on another page (Talk:Rook and pawn versus rook endgame#Colour bias), the the standard convention in chess literature when using illustrative positions is to show them from White's side.  Positions from actual games are usually given with their actual colors, but sometimes even they are reversed to show it from White's side (and never to show it from Black's side).  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 15:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First diagram
Template talk:Focusletter

message: It would be useful for this template to only select among letters that are present in a given category. --Eleassar my talk 11:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unused letters

message: What about numbers and other non letter things? --MGA73 (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this should have a "letter" for 0-9 at the very least. LobStoR (talk) 00:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Numbers
Talk:Meat the Veals

message: In the cultural references section it mentions that choking Franklin is similar to Homer choking Bart... That's an idiotic statement.  It actually refers to the 70's show Soap, where Burt Campbell chokes his son Chuck's puppet Bob.  Soap was created by Susan Harris, who then created The Golden Girls, where she worked with Jim Vallely-a writer/producer on Soap, The Golden Girls, Arrested Development, and Modern Family.  If you watch both shows, you'll notice many similarities between the two.    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.106.242.150 (talk) 06:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Current version of the article states that the epsisode title is a reference to the film Meet the Parents. What is the source for that, if any? The plot of the episode actually has little relation to the plot of the film Meet the Parents. It’s more likely that the episode title is a play on Meet the Beatles! since "Veals" sounds like "Beatles". --Mathew5000 11:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't for the life of me remember where I got the reference from. All I can think of is that Michael does meet the parents of Anne. Evil Monkey - Hello 00:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The film Meet the Parents was about a guy meeting his fiancée's parents -- not his son's fiancée's parents. In Arrested Development, George Michael had already met Ann's parents. An episode about Michael meeting his son's girlfriend's parents just is not parallel to what happens in the film Meet the Parents. Aside from that, if they wanted an episode title that referred to the film Meet the Parents, they could just have called the episode "Meet the Parents". Linguistically there is nothing similar about the words "Veals" and "Parents", but there is a similarity between "Veals" and "Beatles", so I think it's pretty clear the title is a reference to the Beatles album. --Mathew5000 03:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Found the reference - TV.com. Evil Monkey - Hello 06:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think tv.com qualifies as a reliable source. There is no indication for example that this information originated with the producers of the show. It is probably just a faulty assumption someone made and submitted to tv.com. Hence I will delete it from the Wikipedia article. --Mathew5000 19:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode title 

message: Under the 'cameos' section, why does Simon Helberg have his other work cited while the other cameos dont?  I think the '(formerly a MADtv feature player and now known from the popular CBS sitcom The Big Bang Theory) plays Jeff in the scenes at Maeby's workplace' bit does not need to be included.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.121.18.254 (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameos
Talk:Werribee South, Victoria

message: According to the official map of Metro Melbourne dated 2018, it's not located in the metro area: https://www.sro.vic.gov.au/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Map-of-greater-Melbourne-2018.jpg MisterZed (talk) 07:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werribee South is not part of Melbourne
Talk:City of Melton

message: I've just created eleven new articles for suburbs which were recently gazetted within the City of Melton. They are Harkness, Weir Views, Cobblebank, Strathtulloh, Thornhill Park, Grangefields, Bonnie Brook, Aintree, Fieldstone, Fraser Rise and Deanside. Although new addresses do not officially come into effect until mid-2017, the place names have been gazetted and are therefore legally valid suburbs with a population, so fit the criteria under WP:NGEO.
While all the articles are stubs, they'll require some work including changing links, inserting pictures, descriptions of the origins of the names, etc. The two most useful links are the City of Melton and DTPLI. Happy editing! JamesA  >talk 09:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleven new suburbs for the City of Melton 
Talk:Ajaeng

message: Are these the original Chinese characters: 雅筝?  Badagnani 06:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate characters

message: There's a lot that needs fixed there, aside from lacking citations. It looks (at best) copy-pasted from google translate, which I suspect is the case. Jep1203 (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to play section
Talk:Foley & Lardner

message: This report is about [half of] the "Edit comment" for this edit: 
* https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foley_%26_Lardner&diff=prev&oldid=890201445 
That edit comment says:(Added a notable employee Brian Hagedorn, who also worked for this law firm. And I added that Lisa Neubauer is a candidate for Wisconsin Supreme court.)(Tag: Visual edit); but the portion of that edit comment after the word "And", -- (namely << "I added that Lisa Neubauer is a candidate for Wisconsin Supreme court." >>), -- does not agree with the changes made, according to the DIFF listing. 
=== The problem === 
The change made, (other than the one involving adding Brian Hagedorn), was an update to the entry for "Joan F. Kessler, Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge"; ...NOT to the entry for "Lisa Neubauer". 
I am not sure whether the article is correct now ("as of" that "Revision as of 13:33, 30 March 2019" edit); but if it is, then that edit comment is wrong. 
(Perhaps worse), if that edit comment is right, then the article is wrong now -- (that is, the addition of "and candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court," may have been done ...in the wrong place in the article). 
=== Any comments? ===
Either way, [it seems that] something is wrong. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit comment not consistent with the edit (see the changes shown in the DIFF listing)  

message: Either way, [it seems that] something is wrong. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any comments?
Template talk:Oz

message: Wicked and its sequels, all non-canonical are less releavent to this template than the original Oz books.  I propose that they either be deleted or the original Oz books listed. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wicked

message: Which film is this? is it the adaption slated for 2012, mentioned at Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz#Future adaptations? or something else? It should not be in the template unless we know which film its referring to and whether its assured to qualify for an article. the film we already mention that i have guessed it is doesnt seem to be notable enough to be in the template (though i could be wrong, as any baum fan worth their salt should be salivating over accurately portrayed characters and a script based strictly on the book).If its this film , its not notable yet.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (2011)

message: , what did "reimaged" mean? – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was supposed too mean Reimagining i.e those films that don't fit in with the oz cannon one way or another. DoctorHver (talk) 14:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent changes 

message: Shouldn't Yankee and Enchanted Island be grouped with Thompson's other books? Goustien (talk) 03:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thompson books
Talk:Pam Postema

message: *Before making a decision to mark this page for deletion, consider these facts:
**Although Postema was not particularly notable purely for her umpiring resume, she was the first female to officiate at A, AA, AAA, and quasi-MLB levels.  These are unique and notable contributions to the game, and she was a true trailblazer in baseball.  Due to the fact that she was a female, there's no real benchmark to compare her success as an umpire to; Postema is the benchmark, or she completely surpassed it if Bernice Gera and Christine Wren  are treated as the benchmarks.
**Of the individuals mentioned on the Baseball Reliquary page in the Shrine of the Eternals section, Postema was the only one not to have a wikipedia page, as of my writing this article.
**Her story is one of true human interest.  She is one of the few umpires who have ever written a published book, and one of even fewer who have written a biographical work rather than an umpiring book.
**A search for her name on google brings back 12,400 results.  A search for Dusty Boggess returns about 19,000, and he was a professional umpire for 18 years, so his name will be listed on countless scorecards and box scores.  Nestor Chylak is a hall of famer, and his name only returns 28,000.
***Just for the record, I am not affiliated in any way with Postema or any of her pals.  I found out about her through the Baseball Reliquary wikipedia page and I think this is an article worth adding. Davemcarlson 11:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Damien Kane

message: I am Damiens son. My name is also Damien, and I put this page together as a class project in honor of my father and his career as a pro wrestler. The facts stated are based on personal interviews with my father and my source of reference for most of the stated facts are from various newspaper, magazines, and video tapes from his personal collection. I can tell you that the early reports that document his start in pro wrestling are from newspaper clips from the Lynn, Boston, and Peabody Mass. newspapers, but I cannot give exact dates because it is not listed in the clips. Although I do have copies of the clips for anyone that cares to read them. There are also several wrestling magazines that also document his career that I can also furnish pictures and articles from as well.
I guess I'm not sure what I need to do to verify the information so this article stays on Wickipedia, but if someone is willing to help me do whatever I need to do, I would be greatful. My father is a great man and I would like for him to be remembered for what he has contributed to the world of pro wrestling, and I know he would not do this for himself so I would like to do it for him. Please help keep my fathers memory alive.
Thank you,
Damien KaneDamien 04:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiable content
Talk:Mufti (dress)

message: This article contains plagiarism. Quotation marks are required around the second paragraph.  This paragraph has been attributed to the RAN, but it has in fact been copied verbatim from the RAN's website.
:I paraphrased that paragraph and changed the link to that site to a reference. Should be OK now. Recury 19:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article doesn't explain the origin of the word "mufti," which is what I was trying to find out. That should probably be included. --Muna (talk) 01:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "Mufti" 

message: I don't believe the etymology from NUFDY - which contradicts the rest of the article. No citation is given, and the only relevant Google hit for NUFDY is this article. It looks like a back-formation to me. 20:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "NUFDY"? 

message: second link gets 404  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.160.2.254 (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: link doesn't work

message: This article concerns the English language loan word "mufti", which is derived from Arabic and describes casual civilian clothing (as distinct from a uniform, business or  formal wear). There's no obvious connection to India or why this would be described as "Indian clothing" or be part of the Wikipedia India project? --2407:7000:A12B:8553:31B2:879E:C3D3:9A09 (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this in the Wikipedia India project 

message: I broke off the New Zealand controversy into its own heading, with more context provided by historian Katie Pickles. 82.69.78.42 (talk) 11:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems to be a peculiarly Kiwi piece of handwringing. 'Mufti' isn't a term used in British schools (though it's understood in the culture generally, though rather dated). The Katie Pickles piece is a very weak ref, and something from a NZ mainstream RS would be much better. The fact that some virtue signalling academic thinks that this is offensive is neither here nor there. --Ef80 (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Centre 2000

message: A photo of the mall, and the post-demolition acres of blacktop would be nice. 76.66.195.196 (talk) 07:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: What year was Centre 2000 torn down? I recall the very last tenant (Maxi's supermarket) closed shop either in 1999 or 2000 and it was very shortly after that the mall itself was demolished. I also remember thinking it was ironic the mall was demolished the same year of its name sake, so 2000 or 2001 sounds about right. Does anyone know the specific year it was demolished? I'm trying to find an online reference but having no luck. FYI: The mall's parking lot and floor ruins weren't demolished until the spring of 2011.
Found this bit of information:
http://www.cbre.ca/EN/Our+Offices/Quebec/Montreal/Professional+Profile/RamsayLunan/Significant+Assignments.htm
"Completed sale of Centre 2000 in Laval, Quebec, a 375,000 SF enclosed retail mall (December 2000)."
If the physical building (not just land) was only sold December 2000, then it would make sense it was demolished sometime in 2001. 
--Apple2gs (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: When was the mall demolished?
Talk:Strand Bookstore

message: I have never seen anyone but an employee wearing "Strand apparel".  This statement in the article sounds like original research. -THB 11:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strand apparel spotted about Greenwich Village

message: Wrong/different Fred Bass. Disambiguation required! --Ludvikus 01:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Fred Bass]] 

message: Why is there a picture of her? Even though she is mentioned in the article, the article isn't about her but of the shop itself. If there should be a picture, there should be one of the owner. 130.195.5.7 (talk) 03:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner's daughter 

message: This article does a concise, but good job at answering the who, what, where, and when questions. However, it lacks information on the motivation of establishing the bookstore, and what the bookstore's intended purpose is. 
It also does not mention how the bookstore has come to acquire its 2.5 million books and other materials. Found on the bookstore's website, Strand buys books, DVDS, audiobooks etc.  Yeilingma (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? How?
Talk:Multiplication ALU

message: I added a clean up tag. This article is way too opaque for the subject matter. The notation is terrible. Simpler examples are needed.--agr 12:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The notation appears to be verilog, which may be a useful choice of notation for the kind of person interested in this article. JulesH 11:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I've added an introductory segment for the non-engineers around (after all, if someone knows Verilog, they will know binary multiplication already... ). -- fbs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.135.58 (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added an introduction 

message: I suggest merging binary multiplier into multiplication ALU.
Both of them talk about the same thing -- an electronic circuit that multiplies two binary numbers.
--68.0.124.33 (talk) 21:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: Why is this article called "Multiplication ALU"? It is not an obvious title. I have only ever heard such circuits described as multipliers. Is "ALU" supposed to indicate that this article is about integer multipliers or something? If it is, where did "Multiplication" come from? I suggest that the article be renamed to "Multiplier (computer arithmetic)", "Multiplier (digital circuit)", or something similar. Any comments? Rilak (talk) 06:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Mobile data terminal

message: This article should be renamed "Mobile Data Terminal" since it forms the acronym MDT.Dlombard 12:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Is the VMT & RDT devices, used in the container terminals and seaport, are a kind of MDT? If yes, it needs a mention in this article. Currently, RDT & VMT are not described anywhere in Wiki.
Amit Upadhyay 10:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio Data Terminal (RDT) & Vehicle Mounted Terminal (VMT)

message: What form of communications link(s) are commonly used by MDTs? Do they use systems from the cellular phone network (GSM, GPRS etc), or specialist radio networks (analogue or digital? etc), or what?Tjwood 10:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communications link?
Talk:List of English counties by area

message: I'm worried.  Firstly there's no source cited for the data; secondly it doesn't match what I've found at the National Statistics site, here.  For instance, using the .xls file I calculate the area for County Durham to be 2236.85 square kilometres, as opposed to the 2226 listed in the article.
(In my calculation I added the areas for the following areas together to attain a figure for Durham:
Chester-le-Street, Derwentside, Durham, Easington, Sedgefield, Teesdale, Wear Valley).
It's possible I've miscalculated but we definitely need to state (and link to, wherever possible) a source for the data in this and the related articles.  An "as at" date should also be included; the data I'm looking at are dated November 2001.  Waggers 12:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong?