Talk:Rivka Carmi

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 21:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Please add in "Awards and recognition" 
2019 - Honorary degree, Brandeis University, Massachusetts, USA.
 Source: https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/pages/news/rivka_brandeis.aspx
--Zahira Cohen (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 5 June 2020 

message: Suggestions implemented As far as the maintenance templates are concerned, these were advised as needing an "independent editor" to make the change. Despite both of us being independent editors, neither myself nor  feel comfortable removing it on our own. Thus the template's removal, for now, awaits an independent someone else. In other words, someone completely removed from the process who can look at it with fresh eyes, should decide.  Spintendo ᔦᔭ 17:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply

message: Hi!
I would like to change the picture to this updated picture of Carmi:
File:Carmi 2015- updated photo.jpg
What can be done in order to delete the COI tag? Who can be invited to read and remove the tag?
I am following the rules for paid editing
Thank you in advance
Zahira Cohen (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 24 January 2018 

message: Thank you very much for the editing so far. 
I would like to refine the translation I wrote. 
"What I have in mind is the good of the university, so once a person is elected to head it, I will be the first to congratulate, to vacate my place and to pave the way for anyone *who finds it suitable* - even if it is earlier than the two years that I was asked to fill:
Please change the phrase in the asterisks to 
"who will be found suitable".
Thanks!
Zahira Cohen (talk) 01:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 24 January 2018 

message: Corrected. The mistranslation of the 3rd person present verb "be" was Google's error (and mine for posting it) so the article has been corrected. Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 02:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply

message: Dear editors, 
It's been a year since I've asked to review this article so that the COI flag will be removed. 
I declared that all of my editings were done from a neutral point of view and for the interest of the public, I followed Wikipedia's rules for paid editing. Thus, please review this page and consider removing the COI tag. Zahira Cohen (talk) 09:32, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 7 December 2018 

message: There are several peculiarities in the article which gives other editors insight into what a heavily-COI edited article looks like. These include:
# The subject's early life minutiae recounted in extraordinary (and irrelevant) detail (i.e., her father was a painter..)
# An inordinate number of bundled ref tags inappropriately placed as references for articles that are only mentioned because the article's subject co-wrote them (e.g., Author of over 150 publications in medical genetics, her research included the identification of 12 new genes[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]").
# An Honors section, with every listed item just as non-notable as the next
These three items stand out as prime examples of COI editor-induced urban blight. This blight ultimately diminishes the article's overall encyclopedic tone. 
It is for these reasons that I believe the COI editor template should remain. The problems with this article are directly tied to this component, and other editors should be advised of it (through the use of the template) in order to effect any change upon it. Regards,  Spintendo  14:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 07-DEC-2018