Talk:Peruvian Army

message: I think a good start would be to translate the article in the Spanish Wikipedia. --Aidanb 22:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, the article translation is done, can someone with more knowledge of military terms check and correct it? Also, expanding the article, including sources and making it a little more objective would help.  --Gabbec 00:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources of Information 

message: I have a doubt regarding the 9th Armored Brigade. As far as I know, this used to be deployed at Lima until transferred to Tumbes during or inmediately after the 1995 Cenepa War. Where is it know? The EP page on the North Military Region does not mention it, neither does the one on the Center Military Region (which lacks details on its subordinated units). Does anybody have any info on this? --Victor12 21:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Battle 

message: There's no specific numbers of men or material in this article and it seems as though there should be. Maybe one of us can dig it up? Useless Fodder 19:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Victor just added them, never realized they were that low. Great work by the way Victor.--Jersey Devil 05:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Victor has just received a barnstar from me for his outstanding efforts on this article. Congrats. Useless Fodder 08:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific Numbers 

message: Evogol has just added 
*12 BM-27 220 mm multiple rocket launcher 
*10 BM-30 300 mm multiple rocket launcher 
I guess the source for this info is Tecnologia Militar, N°1/2006, but I'm not quite sure on its accuracy. As I haven't seen the publication myself, I have to ask whether there it has pics of this systems in Peruvian Army Service. If not, it might be just unconfirmed rumors, much like the widespread references to Peruvian Army T-72s which are clearly false. --Victor12 14:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Victor I got that information from an article of the last edition of Tecnologia Militar, the article is about russian artillery in south american armies. I also changed BM-21 qty from 14 to 26 -- EvogolTalk 17:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok, but I'm not sure if this info is actually reliable. There are absoltulely no images of either of this rocket systems (BM-27 or BM-30) in Peruvian Army service. Does the article mentioned when where this systems acquired? All of the equipment acquired during the Fujimori regime has been made public either in military parades or in the course of investigations on corruption cases. Thus it's quite unlikely that they were bought at that time. On the other hand if they have been bought after 2000, it's quite unlikely that such a contract would have gone unnoticed. After all, BM-30 (9K58 Smerch) is a very expesive system. Check this link for instance:  Now you surely remember how hard was it to find $15 million for the two second-hand Lupos acquired last year. How did they found the money to buy this very expensive rocket launchers and still managed to keep it a secret??? --Victor12 00:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Until there's further confirmation of the presence of BM-27 and BM-30 in Peruvian Army service, I'm reverting the equipment table to the IISS figures. --Victor12 02:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocket Launchers 

message: The May Collaboration is over for this page, please see the portal for the next collaboration and voting for July's Collaboration. Thanks (particularly to Victor).--Jersey Devil 05:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Tag

message: I'll remove both tanks from the inventory of the Peruvian Army because that sources are WRONG, mostly based on rumors, there is no intention of acquire T-80s, the PT-91 is ON EVALUATION, I was present on its presentation on the SITDEF Peru 2009, even I was able to enter inside the tank. The T-80 is totally out of question, because its expensive power plant and lack of support. Greetings.--Cloudaoc (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About the T80 and PT91 in the Peruvian Army

message: Placing a section here to discuss the images in the article so we can avoid edit warring. The images that were originally incorporated into the article are of the basic weapons that are issued to the army. Images showing further modifications to the weapon should not be used in this article since we cannot guarantee whether the majority of troops use these or if the modifications even exist within the army.----ZiaLater (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Basic Weapons is a Chidlish Way to solved. This is 2018!, don't try to aviod My System.The Showgun Master (talk) 07:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image edits 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion