lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fly! II

message: Below is the prior version of this article, before I "cleaned it up".  I couldn't really make sense one way or the other what the original author was trying to say about the game, so I felt the best thing to do was just tear it out and put it here for posterity.  Source citation was rather bad, just a simple unlinked reference to Gamespot.
 Fly! II is a virtual flight simulator released on April 26, 2001, by Gathering, formerly known as Gathering God games,
 known for other games such as the Serious Sam series and the Blair Witch series, partnered with another company, Terminal Reality,
 known for games such as Bloodrayne series and Terminal Velocity. The two developers have come together on many projects before,
 including this one. Fly! II is one of the only contenders for the throne of Microsoft (As said by Gamespot.com). Given a poor
 rating by most some, short for simulator, fans and by most reviews ranked low. Most gamers would say that this game is rather
 left to the actual pilots to review and rate but for now gamers have placed a dark look on this and the other installments in
 the Fly! Series due to bugs and glitches as well as the lack of scenery and complexity with or without the game manual,
 not sold with the release of the game itself.
-- Hawaiian717 05:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior Version 

message: Fly! and Fly! II are short articles on a two game series from defunct developer and publisher. I propose a single Fly! series' article. 03:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal
Talk:Sabrina Bryan

message: *We need a photo of her for this page. Someone please find one of her.LAUGH90 02:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Photo

message: Last night 11/7/2007 on Inside Edition they announced that Sabrina and Mark are engaged.76.31.18.72 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Engagement

message: The cite provided said someone named "Reba Sabrina Hinojos" was born on the date given. This was used to show that "Sabrina Bryan" is that person. This is not evident. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth info
Talk:Romantic interest

message: "Many stories contain love interests in which the character, or the subplot, is immensely implausible." Why is this arguably common? To increase interest in the plot and its characters? I'd love a literary review as a citation. Gotyear 04:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Implausible love interests

message: Is there any way we can do away with the entire list all together? What good is it doing?
Mlle thenardier 23:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. We should move the good examples into the body of the article, though, to replace the existing Disney ones. --McGeddon (talk) 10:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed it as the list had continued to grow, with no sign of sourcing nor evidence that there's any effort to convert the miscellaneous trivia list into anything remotely encyclopedic. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lists of love interests

message: Can Rachel be considered as a love interest for Percy Jackson in the Percy Jackson series?
Saiarcot895 (talk) 03:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percy Jackson Love Interest 

message: “The romantic interest (also called love interest) is a stock character, an object of romantic admiration and attraction for the main character(s), or hero/heroine e/s.”
What does “e/s” mean? --Adam Brody (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  e/s
Talk:Felix Aylmer

message: ODNB says he died in Surrey; IMDB says Sussex.  Perhaps Pyrford is in both, but I am editing the article to go with Surrey. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of death

message: 'His memorable style of delivery was frequently mimicked...' We would need to know what were the characteristics of this style. 109.154.15.87 (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual style 
Talk:Oakville Trafalgar High School

message: The "Extracurriculars" section was added by a hoaxer. 68.39.174.238 17:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be wary... 

message: It is my understanding that lists of notable alumni should include a brief description after the person's name why exactly they are notable. Amp71 (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni 

message: I've moved the picture of the rugby scrum to the rugby section from the infobos. The picture in the infobox should be one of the campus or building. Can anyone provide such a picture? Meters (talk) 00:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox picture 

message: Should it be absorbed into the history section? It seems a bit too short to stand on it's own, and it really is just part of OTHS history.  Bremps (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relay for Life Section
Talk:Lotnisko, Szczecin

message: Is this the same airport as Port Lotniczy Szczecin-Goleniów - covered by the article at Szczecin Airport? 
If this is a different airport then perhaps the article at Szczecin Airport sould be moved to Port Lotniczy Szczecin-Goleniów (which is currently a redirect page) and this article should be either moved to Szczecin airport, or Szczcin Airport shouild become a disambiguation page.
-- Adz|talk 05:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:1986 NHL supplemental draft

message: *Steve MacSwain - 6
*Randy Taylor (ice hockey) - 2
Note: Articles must also meet WP:GNG. --75.88.89.194 (talk) 06:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  These redlinked draft picks meet [[WP:NHOCKEY]] 
Talk:1989 NHL supplemental draft

message: *Peter Hankinson (wikidata:Q1511313) - 2
*Ian Boyce - 2
Note: Articles must also meet WP:GNG. --75.88.89.194 (talk) 07:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  These redlinked draft picks meet [[WP:NHOCKEY]] 
Talk:Greenbank, Queensland

message: The site aussieheritage.com.au calls the GMTB by 'Greenbank Military Training Area'. Is one incorrect or is it more a case of the GMTB is located within the GMTA? I was planning on starting an article for the firing range but am stuck on its official name. --Spuzzdawg (talk) 16:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenbank Military Training Base
Talk:Dorothea Mackellar

message: A musical has been written about Mackellar, and is being staged for performance. (Since this is not supposed to be an advertisement, I'll leave out the location and performance dates.) It hasn't been included in the article for the sole reason that the playwright, Bill Gleeson, is not a notable person.
If this comment violates Wikipedia:Spam, the author gives unreserved permission for deletion. --JB Adder | Talk 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just to note (this is not an advertisement) 

message: Did she get married or have kids? It would be interesting to find out
:No, apparently she had two failed engagements but never married. . -- Moondyne 02:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: I am a student at Mackellar Primary School which is named after Dorothea Mackellar, should the school be mentioned in the article?Atomic45 03:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely. Go for it. —Moondyne 04:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The School 
Talk:Ice shanty

message: Surely this is purely US/Canadian-based? It doesn't say so, but it should surely? Peter Shearan 06:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily ... there is probably some equivalent term in Scandinavia, Russia, etc. Not the same English term, of course ... - DavidWBrooks 11:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am going to move this article to "Ice fishing shelter" because that seems to be what manufacturers call them as well as that being the top google hit by a bit. 
Manufacturers:
*
*
*
*
*
google:
*bobhouse
*Ice shanty
*fish house
*ice hut
*fishing shanty
*fishing shelter
*Ice fishing shelter
I think thats pretty conclusive -Ravedave 03:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you never did ... so I created the page and had it redirect here, in case people come looking under that time. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Williamstown High School (New Jersey)

message: These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I have assessed this article as C-class and identified the following areas for improvement:
* The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion
shirulashem (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comments
Talk:List of airports in Poland with unpaved runways

message: Can anybody help with this question? Should Szczecin-Lotnisko be moved to Szczecin-Dąbie, or even better, Szczecin-Dąbie Airport? Please see also comments at Talk:Szczecin Airport regarding moving that article and turning the page into a disambiguation page. Thanks. -- Adz|talk 06:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this. My mistake. I think I may have read Szczecin-Lotnisko as saying "Szczecin-Lotnisko is a municipal airport in Szczecin..." which led to my confusion. I agree with your suggestion for there to be a disambiguation page though. I will copy your comment to the talk page at Szczecin Airport and see if anybody disagrees with moving it. -- Adz|talk 07:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Szczecin airport?

message: This now has a paved runway...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.193.106 (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: EPRJ

message: Is there really an aerodrome of any kind? Documentation welcome. I consider removing the entry, for lack of any. Jan olieslagers (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  EPMJ Mikołajki
Talk:Wang Luobin

message: This is a poorly revised version of this article. Ridiculous and problematic. "Western-style songs" for example is a very strange description of his music, stemming from the poor translation of the "source"; the link to "Daban" doesn't lead to a city in Xinjiang, but to Ōsaka. The article doesn't mention that Wang Luobin came to Xinjiang as an army cadre, and that he was imprisoned from 1960 to 1975. Unimportant details? —Babelfisch 06:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous stolen material
Talk:Ann Rohmer

message: Parts of the are article use either old, out-dated information, or switch between current and outdated information. Also, there are issues were sections use current-tense grammar, rather than past-tense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.34.162.176 (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Parts of article are out of date
Talk:HMAS Anzac (FFH 150)

message: Photographs have been requested to improve this article.
http://www.defence.gov.au/opfalconer/images/gallery/070403/070403.htm
Video avalble, convert to ogg and add to wiki article.
http://www.defence.gov.au/opfalconer/video/ANZAC_26MAR03.mpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.126.236.103 (talk) 05:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs 
Talk:HMAS Anzac (G90)

message: "The destroyer was decommissioned on 4 August 1928, then recommissioned on 10 January 1928."
Any reason it was recommissioned before it was decommissioned?
Garyvp71 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:56, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because the original source says 4 August 1926, not 1928! Now fixed. Thanks for spotting this.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Apache (film)

message: Just watched the movie and at the end, the end titles/credits are shown over a drawn medallion/cameo-like design featuring the bust of a woman facing left.
Am curious as to what this represented/honored/meant. 2600:8800:786:A300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medallion/cameo
Talk:Assault on Precinct 13 (2005 film)

message: The plot summary doesn't seem to mention Capra, and the suspicion he is under.  Saccerzd (talk) 15:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Nest is a French film that is influenced by the original Assault. It has been suggested that it, in turn, influenced the remake. Anyone have a source for that ? -- Beardo 16:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. That bloated, unencyclopedic plot section was added on April 28 by some anon, so I've reverted to an earlier version. —Xezbeth 16:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Nest 

message: I've removed an extremely detailed, blow-by-blow account of the plot added a couple of hours ago by User:172.133.54.78. 3,000 words on every detail of a film's plot is not suitable for Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway 03:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary
Talk:Louis Auguste Blanqui

message: Saying that Blanqui was the "only non-Marxist socialist of his day" is highly contentious.  This was also the era of Proudhon and Bakunin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Vardy (talk • contribs) 03:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure that there were any birth certificates in those days in France or elsewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.29.112 (talk) 13:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Katherine Jackson

message: Love micolejason 75.177.23.191 (talk) 03:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her son mickle 
Talk:HMAS Ardent (P 87)

message: In 1998 HMAS Ardent was declared surplus to training requirements and subsequently transferred to Darwin at the request of the then Administrator of the Northern Territory, Mr Neil Conn.   The plan was to preserve her at the Northern Territory Museum in Fannie Bay as a memorial to the Attack Class patrol boats that had served in Darwin and to the two sailors who were lost in HMAS Arrow during Cyclone Tracy on Christmas Day 1974. 
The idea was greeted with indifference by the then County Liberal Party Government, on the grounds of costs for relocation, and the ship remained laid up at Darwin Naval Base for a number of years.  Ex HMAS Ardent was subsequently declared for disposal and in 2002 the ship was demilitarised and sold to Singapore interests for use as a fishing boat.  Her ultimate fate remains unknown. 23Feb76 (talk) 09:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. Do you have any sources (news articles, websites, etc) that could be used to back this up if it were added to the article? -- saberwyn 22:24, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to [Current Indonesian Navy ships], HMAS Ardent is now the KRI Tenggiri. No idea what that page's source is, though. Myk (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disposal of Ex HMAS Ardent (P87)
Talk:Open marriage incidence

message: Kelly 07:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Released July 26, 2006

message: Original research? Really? The article discusses the incidence of open marriages. The article does not report original research about the incidence of open marriages. It reviews several studies (published in scientific journals) that examined the incidence of open marriage. Claims for orginal research in this case are spurious.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.213.183.98 (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove original research tag

message: The articles Open marriage, Open marriage relationship, Open marriage styles, Open marriage acceptance, Open marriage incidence, and Open marriage jealousy ought to be merged into Open relationship.
The destination article clearly encompasses the subject matter of all six articles. These are content forks, and these have in fact become interleaved and self-referential; for instance, sections have been added to Open marriage simply to justify the existence of other articles, and likewise sections have been put into the smaller articles to point back to each other.
When the merge is completed, the significant redundancies can be readily removed, leaving a single credible destination for the topic.Weeb Dingle (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge
Talk:Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party

message: What's "MPP"?  Not the Maldivian Democratic Party?  A-giau 07:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) is the main opposition. Maldivian Peoples Party (MPP) is the ruling party. --Oblivious 13:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Open marriage styles

message: Kelly 07:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Released July 26, 2006

message: The articles Open marriage, Open marriage relationship, Open marriage styles, Open marriage acceptance, Open marriage incidence, and Open marriage jealousy ought to be merged into Open relationship.
The destination article clearly encompasses the subject matter of all six articles. These are content forks, and these have in fact become interleaved and self-referential; for instance, sections have been added to Open marriage simply to justify the existence of other articles, and likewise sections have been put into the smaller articles to point back to each other.
When the merge is completed, the significant redundancies can be readily removed, leaving a single credible destination for the topic.Weeb Dingle (talk) 22:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge
Talk:Delicate Sound of Thunder (film)

message: Was there another keyboardist on this concert besides Richard and Jon? I think he was sharing one with Richard. Mr magoo popped in to play chopsticks after money--D-Day I'm all ears 23:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No Dyolf87 (talk) 08:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra keyboardist? 

message: Money appears not only on NTSC releases, but also on those PAL releases:
https://www.discogs.com/Pink-Floyd-In-Concert-Delicate-Sound-Of-Thunder/release/6710644
https://www.discogs.com/Pink-Floyd-Delicate-Sound-Of-Thunder/release/7755524
Though the latter might be NTSC.
46.76.79.223 (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australian VHS could be unofficial and the second one is most definitely a bootleg. Discogs is not a reliable source. I live in a PAL area (Europe) and no European version had "Money" on VHS. – Dyolf87 (talk) 08:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: YEs, discogs is not a reliable source, in fact a quick run through the images of that release shows that some moron just copied the tracklist from NTSC release, because the backcover does not have Money in the tracklist. But still, Money was never released in PAL, even now, as the BD is IVTC and the DVD is NTSC, considering the source was filmed in 24p the Blu-Ray is a downgrade as it plays in incorrect speed... 85.221.132.244 (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Money
Talk:Open marriage jealousy

message: Kelly 07:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Released July 26, 2006

message: This page is sourced exclusively by random papers that a wikipedia user will not find accessible to them. This needs to change. Some of the facts in this article are ones I'd like to check - but I can't. If someone can, please try to find web links to reliable sources for this information. Fresheneesz (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: --96.243.180.45 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  why even bother guys!! 

message: Just a suggestion:
The article currently presumes that all jealousy concerns the primary partner's time spent with a secondary partner (i.e., that one primary partner is jealous of a secondary partner...).
This omits competitive jealousy and jealousy of various other kinds, e.g., that one primary partner is jealous that the other finds more secondary partners, or elicits more interest from potential secondary partners, etc.
I think this article could grow, and could really be useful, because it can link together otherwise hard to find published sources on this stuff.
Hopefully we don't end up with a bunch of links to articles from Cosmopolitan (magazine) --but even if so... better than nothing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.178.26.104 (talk) 05:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jealousy, sub-divide into a few types 

message: The articles Open marriage, Open marriage relationship, Open marriage styles, Open marriage acceptance, Open marriage incidence, and Open marriage jealousy ought to be merged into Open relationship.
The destination article clearly encompasses the subject matter of all six articles. These are content forks, and these have in fact become interleaved and self-referential; for instance, sections have been added to Open marriage simply to justify the existence of other articles, and likewise sections have been put into the smaller articles to point back to each other.
When the merge is completed, the significant redundancies can be readily removed, leaving a single credible destination for the topic.Weeb Dingle (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merge
Wikipedia talk:Mass Moves

message: This is a start at a policy proposal for blocking users that perform excessive page moves without consensus. I'm not sure if we need this or not, but there have been some recent incidents that could have used clearer guidance on how to handle them. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 07:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While this is a problem, and a short block to immediately stop the moving may be appropriate, I'm not sure a new policy page is necessary. I think it should be brought up on WP:BLOCK and, if appropriate, a short addition would be added there. —Centrx→talk • 07:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I have several concerns about this, It's overly broad and very subjective depending on the admin which applies to a lot of policies and guidelines I know but this is even broader than most.  I also don't know if this is necessary since it codifies common sense and existing practices which are probably better done without an explicit guideline/policy to follow. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 07:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns 

message: Actually, this proposal could be merged with the WP:SBOTS proposal. That proposal has as its general principle:Don't serialize edits that have a reasonable chance of being perceived as contentious.That proposal also foresees that an account performing contentious serialized edits can be blocked within minutes after a warning has been posted on the user contact page (unless the serialized behaviour stops and the user promises to undo contentious actions).
Note that I think that under AGF a user should be given the chance to reply and correct his/her behaviour before being blocked (a procedure missing from the Mass Moves proposal, and makes it unacceptable compared to for instance WP:AN3, where a block won't be given before a proper warning to the user, and the user continuing after the warning). If the serialized contentious behaviour is performed by a separate "task" account, blocking that account should be less of a moral dilemma to the blocking admin. The SBOTS proposal makes that distinction in analogy to WP:BOTS. --Francis Schonken 13:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  General approach on contentious serialized operations 

message: My feelings on this depend on how excessive is defined.  If we're talking about LOTS of moves without consensus I think the current blocking policy covers this under disruption. — xaosflux Talk 03:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion