Talk:Neve Ativ

message: I deleted the citation of "Al Marsad" the publications of which should not be regarded as a credible source. It is a pro-Syrian, political organization who occasionally publishes anti-Israeli pamphlets.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinakohl (talk • contribs) 19:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This source also appears in  p 151. The quote is Taiseer Maray explains the Israeli settlement programme in the Occupied Golan and in particular the settlement of Neve Ativ, which is built on the destroyed Arab village of Jubata Ez-Zeit. nableezy - 20:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Absolutely not. The Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law is a peer reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press. It is without doubt a reliable source. Please go read WP:RS and do not continue removing content cited to such sources. nableezy - 20:37, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

text: You need to read the policies of this encyclopedia. Original research means a Wikipedia editor adding their own research into an article, citing an article published in such a source is not original research. Whether or not something is a political view is meaningless, and "biased" is a personal opinion. We have policies on what is a reliable source and what neutral point of view means. Repeatedly removing content from such sources is a quick way to get blocked from editing. nableezy - 21:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

text: It does not matter if you think something is "an obviously biased political manifesto". This source is in a peer reviewed journal published by Cambridge University Press. That you do not like the contents does not matter. nableezy - 21:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

text: You have not read the source. That sentence is not from Taiseer Maray, it is in the article written by Declan and Gannon. And your opinion is of no use here. The actual paper, published in a peer reviewed journal from Cambridge University Press, says that Neve Ativ is built on the site of the destroyed Syrian village Jubata ez-Zeit. nableezy - 23:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read the source well. It is indeed in that article except that it as a description of the quote from Taiseer Maray. If you had written "according to one Majdal Shams resident Taiseer Maray, Neve Ativ was..." then it would have been correct. Correct but not to be cited since it would still not have been a credible source which would have pulled the rug under your pro-Syrian agenda and after all, you can not accept that can you?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinakohl (talk • contribs) 01:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is absolutely not true. The line on Neve Ativ being built on the site of Jubata ez-Zeit is from the authors of the report, and if you actually did read the report that would be easy for you to verify. nableezy - 01:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Controversial info should not be in WP first person, and better attributed to the source. --Shuki (talk) 19:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this controversial? Is there a single source that disputes that either Jubata ez-Zeit is a destroyed Syrian village or that Neve Ativ was built on the site of Jubata ez-Zeit? nableezy - 19:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Marsad 

message: There has been long discussion at WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues about adding the illegality issue in all settlement article: There is now consensus to have the sentence: "The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this." in all relevant articles, but its not clear yet exactly where in the article, I have tried to open up a discussion at IPCCAI:  but I haven't gotten any replies to my latest posts. So now I'm just adding the sentence as I had explained at the IPCCAI discussion. If someone disagrees with the placement then we can discuss this. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status sentence 

message: As usual, Supreme Deliciousness is doing all it can to push a POV and use non-neutral language in every article it touches. I have copyedited this article for neutrality and proper English. Supreme Deliciousness does not own the article and should find other topics to edit, as advised by administrators after their last round of sanctions.--Geewhiz (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Gilabrand, how its "non-neutral repetitive hogwash" or "push a POV and use non-neutral language" to have the information that this Israeli settlement is built on land where a former, destroyed Syrian villages once sat? How is the removal of this information "copyedited this article for neutrality" ? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: The part about the ski resort should be derived from Mount Hermon ski resort
Currently I just added the link but I think we should make the connection between the two articles better.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guy.other (talk • contribs) 08:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ski resort section