lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alex Power

message: Just to let you know that the ALEX POWER entry has now been established....
So if anybody wishes to add and update any info of the elder member of the Pack and one of the former New Warriors may do so here (just in case I've overlooked a detail or two)--PaxHouse 17:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Kiy Island

message: Anyone know the Russian-language name of the island and/or monastery? Melchoir 17:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: see :ru:Кий (остров) & :ru:Онежский Крестный монастырь--83.102.202.10 12:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian?

message: Is Kiy Island the same as the Krestny monastery? If not, the Krestny monastery redirect page should not redirect to here. WinterSpw 22:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krestny monastery? 
Talk:Dominique Monami

message: Can't upload them, so this will do.
Igorrr 18:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: The article is part of a category called people from Leuven, but Leuven is or Louvain are not mentioned in the article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.21.219.95 (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leuven
Talk:Gianni di Marco

message: I can't find any reference to this anywhere - do we know for sure that it happened? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 13:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return in 2002 
Talk:Beppe di Marco

message: *Easy come, easy goGungadin 18:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Nicky di Marco

message: You can correct spelling and grammar if need be, but this was one of my favourite storylines (I really sympathized as this was topical subject at the time) the following things have been corrected. 
1. Nicky didn't "Lie about being assaulted" - She was assaulted.  She kissed her teacher, but then he "took things too far", she only "lied" in the sense she didn't mention the she "started things off" (as it where) 
2.  Nicky didn't move to Leicester with the rest of her familly, she left home and stayed in a hostel, because she was so disgusted with her familly (for not believing her when it mattered). MJN SEIFER (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Errors corrected
Talk:Martin Fowler (EastEnders)

message: He has not ruled out a return to the show in the future, so surely it should still be is.
:Well for now, all we know is that there are no current plans for the character to return, therefore he was a character. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 00:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you  have a source for that? — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll trust you on that then. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to clarify that it's always "is" whether they leave or die or what. They never cease to be fictional characters from EastEnders. –anemoneprojectors– 09:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: IS not WAS

message: I've add a "caption" option to the EastEnders infobox.  It's optional, but will be useful for cases where a caption is necessary.  For example, on this article it's a good idea to specify which of the two actors is portraying the character in that particular image. --Elonka 22:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image caption

message: On the Sonia Fowler page it says that her and Martin were married from 2004–06, 2007–11. But on this page it says 2004–06, 2007–present. I'm just wondering if it's been forgotten about or not. PS: If nobody has answered me in 4 years time I'll know the answer.  Tinamckintyre23 (Come and talk!) 09:13, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sonia said in 2011 that she and Martin had split up, but not that they had divorced, so as far as we know, they're still married. –anemoneprojectors– 14:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Discussion would be better in one place so if anyone else has any comments, go to Talk:Sonia Fowler#Did she and Martin re-marry? anemoneprojectors 11:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divorce? 

message: Martin didn't appear in episode 47 (30th July 1985) - the 'doof doof' being Pauline getting into a taxi to hospital. He didn't appear in the next episode (1st August 1985) either. His first appearance was when Pauline brought him home from hospital in episode 49 (4th August 1985). I have updated the article to reflect this. 86.160.54.222 (talk) 02:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing that. AnemoneProjectors 16:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

text: There was no episode on 4 August 1985 - episode 49 was on 6 August. AnemoneProjectors 10:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance 
Talk:WGME TV Tower

message: Needs a rewrite. Antenna never collapsed, nor was rebuilt. Possibly a new transmitter mast was installed on the top in 1975, but I doubt that too. A name change of the parent station from WGAN to WGME happened in about 1984. It was the world's tallest man-made structure until, (I believe), a taller structure was built in Russia or Soviet Union. --dowser 17:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Annie Palmer (EastEnders)

message: There are huge sections of this inaccurate because the order is wrong. Steve didn't reject Annie just after she got beaten up. That happened nearly a whole year prior. Also she never rejected Steve when she'd benn beaten up. 2A00:23C6:2990:8600:D822:90D1:9007:1B0B (talk) 16:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  inaccurate
Talk:American Bicycle Association

message: Their website redirects to the National Bicycle League  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loren Pechtel (talk • contribs) 04:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. Geoffreybmx (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this is now historical 

message: My point is I see nothing on aba filing bankruptcy.  I know for a fact the #1 pro won $50.000 by winning pro spectacular an national #1 Ronnie Anderson did that but was told they couldn't pay him because they started the Hall of  Fame. Godssonwon23 (talk) 08:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy 1985
Talk:Beef III

message: While the article's account of the documentary is correct, it lacks much detail and description. In addition, the grammer, phrasing, and tone of the article need to be redone, while still keeping the same basic idea. 
:-Atlien 18:53 3 August 2006 (UTC)
:The grammar, phrasing and tone of this article are simultaneously hilarious and horrifying. This reads like some dreadful fan page. Totally inappropriate. If anything, there is too much detail, as some sections would seem to recount the entire story. An entire film series about rap feuds.... PurpleChez (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: It lacks detail and description
Talk:Statistical dispersion

message: In  meteorological statistics dispersion is one of the three components of the RMSE:
RMSE^2=MBE^2+sdbias^2+dispersion^2
see for example Hou et al, 2001:
Hou, Dingchen, Kalnay, Eugenia, Droegemeier, Kelvin K.
Objective Verification of the SAMEX ’98 Ensemble Forecasts
Monthly Weather Review 2001 129: 73-91
http://ams.allenpress.com/amsonline/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1175%2F1520-0493(2001)129%3C0073:OVOTSE%3E2.0.CO%3B2
—
I've come across the interpretation of Dispersion as "The second highest value less the second lowest value."   Is this a widely used measure?  And if so, should it be added to the article?   210.55.130.65 21:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've heard of similar things being used.  The idea is simply the range, adjusted for the possibility of two outliers that should be ignored on the grounds that they are atypical. Michael Hardy 22:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: precision should be mentioned in the article. Jackzhp (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: dispersion vs. precision

message: "In the physical sciences ... One may assume that the quantity being measured is unchanging and stable" can't be correct. There are too many sources of variability in the physical sciences - ranging from Brownian Motion to fundamental limits to measurability (i.e., Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle).
Mfidelman (talk) 13:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: sources of statistical dispersion
Talk:West End

message: __TOC__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu (joturner) 03:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support, per nomination above. SteveRwanda 17:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:The Wall Street Journal editorial board

message: I've just removed two items from the "criticism" section, because they violate WP:RS. (Both were quotes from http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/wallst1.htm, which is a copy of a 1998 article from the LaRouche movement.)
We are now left with one item of criticism, an article by someone named Max Sawicky. It arguably fails WP:EL and/or WP:RS; I've left it in mostly as a placeholder, in the hope that someone will find and add at least substantive, citable critique of the Editorial Board. Please? CWC(talk) 18:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Motmot. (I made some changes to your contribution, though.) I've dropped the Max Sawicky link. Cheers, CWC 15:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely looks tighter than before - thanks. For completeness, though, here's realclimate.org on the WSJ editorials and documented mutterings on many matters from fair.org - a 1995 article. Motmot 09:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: The criticism section of this, as detailed above, has been compleetly gutted. Considering that the main WSJ page notes that its own news division calls its editorial division 'Nazis' this seems a clear case of editor political bias. 71.195.87.156 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:13, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please merge. This is definite FORK. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

text: OP has been blocked for socking. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Merge for the given reasons. Gamingforfun365 05:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

text: I support the merge. This page serves no purpose. All the information in it can easily be put in the main WSJ article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism Redux

message: It looks like the list of editorial board members lacks the name of James Taranto.  (Tom Nally, New Orleans, entered 12-November-2011.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.50.50.2 (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: James Taranto

message: It has been suggested that The Wall Street Journal editorial board be merged into The Wall Street Journal. I agree per WP:CFORK and WP:DICDEF, as they are essentially duplicates with same subject, with the same scope. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please merge. This is definite FORK. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

text: OP has been blocked for socking. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Merge for the given reasons. Gamingforfun365 05:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

text: I support the merge. This page serves no purpose. All the information in it can easily be put in the main WSJ article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Bernardo Padrón

message: --Timichal 14:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I have permission to use this material. 
--Lilydustbin 18:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bonbon

message: What retard wrote this? There is not a single true word in the section and the references (which do not make it magically true)!
I am from Germany, and I am originally from Luxemburg, where we have over 30% of the population coming from France, Germany, Belgium and Portugal. I was for nearly two months in France, with French friends. And I lived for 3 months in Spain. So I know myself very well around. And in Europe “bonbons” look like this: http://www.urbanek-gmbh.de/images/inhalt/werbe_bonbons.jpg
By the way: Europe in not a country, and never will be! You can't just go and generalize over all the 46 (yes, that's fortysix!) countries on that continent. We are as different from each other, as the USA is from Brazil, Russia and Turkey. Oh, and yes, we still all know what bonbons are. :P
— 94.220.252.190 (talk) 18:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I call bullshit on the whole “In Europe” section!
Talk:IND Rockaway Line

message: Is it just the impression that I get from NYCSubways.org, or is the IND Rockaway Line a popular site for railfans? Consider these links from Rockaway Park-Beach 116th Street and Far Rockaway-Mott Avenue Stations before you answer this. ----DanTD (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The trip across Jamaica Bay is picturesque, so I suspect it is a popular route for railfan trips. From a practical viewpoint, the route is suitable for slower-moving trains since it sees a lot less service than most of the subway system. Marc Shepherd (talk) 13:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railfan location? 

message: The MTA map no longer uses the diamond <A> symbol for trains to Rockaway Park.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.151.161.131 (talk) 19:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diamond A is discontinued 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :BMT Rockaway Line and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#BMT Rockaway Line until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Epicgenius (talk) 12:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "BMT Rockaway Line" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tony Holland

message: Guys, can you tell me whether Tony Holland is dead or not, because I heard somewhere that he isn't and I don't know whether to edit or not. 
From yours truly, Moslaterfan103  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moslaterfan103 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he died on 28 November 2007, per the article. –anemoneprojectors– 11:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Dan Brouthers

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: BROO-therz, not BRUDH-erz? And with the th of tooth? kwami 01:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BROO-therz.Mannanan51 (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 
Talk:Glen McCoy

message: This was written as if the TV scriptwriter and "business creative" were two separate individuals.  The self-written profile here indicates they are one and the same.  However, some third-party references would be really useful to establish notability, particularly of the business coaching claims. --93.96.136.249 (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed
Talk:Jiajie

message: Either the table of Examples has mistakes, or it is organized in
a very confusing way. It looks like north and back (bei) are reversed.
Same for want and waist (yao) and sand and few (sha/shao). If they 
are not reversed, it should at least be made clear, for example,
that 北 is pronounced	běi 	and means north,
and that 背 is pronounced bèi and means back in modern Chinese. tharsaile 16:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes in Table
Talk:Harold Legg

message: Reception — M.Mario (T/C)  17:27, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Shouldn’t the article title be Dr Legg, since that’s what he’s most known as? Aunt Sal’s article is called Aunt Sal, not Sal Martin. 213.205.194.200 (talk) 13:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. I think the original reason for using his first name is that Wikipedia articles don't use titles like Mr or Dr, but this is a fictional character who is better known as Dr Legg. It's also how he's credited. I should also add that Sal's surname isn't actually known because she's married and Martin is her maiden name, even though she has been called it in the credits before. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 12:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support a move to Doctor Legg rather than Dr. Legg or Harold Legg. That's what he was credited as and I think that's his WP:COMMONNAME. Soaper1234 - talk 16:02, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: He's usually credited as Dr. Legg but I don't like the ".", so Doctor Legg might be a better option. He's often referred to as such in the media (like here) and also said out loud it is "Doctor Legg". — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 23:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Fred Fonseca

message: Didn't he appear in 1998 as Bianca's doctor before becoming the Walford GP? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 23:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry this is very late, but just seen this. Did u get that bit about Bianca from Walford web? I cant confirm whether what they say is accurate or not, is possible since they released a statement about him being an upcoming arrival in March 1998. But various sources say his first appearance was in Jan 1999, inlcuding the Who's who book, his official BBC profile, and that programme catalogue. Maybe the episode guideds on walford.net will shed some light? I'll remove that bit about Bianca until we can confirm. Gungadin 20:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just found an article from September 1998, going on about Matthew Robinson retiring Dr Legg and replacing him with Fonseca. It says "His place is being filled by alternative medicine fan Frederico Fonseca, played by Jimmy Mistry, 25, who made his debut in Sunday's hour-long special", which means that he did first appear in 1998, on Sunday the 13th apparently. Gungadin 21:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Though he's not mentioned by name, Bianca's doctor is mentioned here -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998 

message: *Naked ambition pays off for former EastEnderGungadin 18:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: sources
Talk:Rocket Ship Galileo

message: I noticed that :V-17 redirects here.  The article reads "The V-17 is a fictional rocket mentioned in Robert Heinlein's book Rocket Ship Galileo".  Is this the Nazi ship?  If so, can someone add it to the article?  It's been a long time since I read the book.  Thanks.  --EarthPerson 03:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked the book and V-17 is the model of a fictional "Atlantic freighter-rocket" that they convert into the rocket ship Galileo. The reason that V-17 may redirect here could be because the rocket from which the book is named is an altered V-17. As there is no actual V-17 rocket and there is an actual V-17 truck, this seems to me to be a disingenuous link that would be best removed as it is, at best, a trivial detail of the book that occupies a page or two at the end of chapter 3. MrSplendid (talk) 18:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  V-17?
Talk:The Eastern States Exposition

message: Does anybody else think it is odd that the "State Fair" hyperlink points to the "State Fair" movies and not the "State fair" page about state fairs in general?  I'm not sure how to resolve this.
:It can be resolved by making it a piped link to "State fair" -- which I went ahead and did.  Kind of funky that "State Fair" and "State fair" are two very different articles... --NapoliRoma 19:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link problem 

message: ...but isn't the fair called the Big E, but the grounds are called the Eastern States Exposition? There are many events that aren't the state fair held there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vulture19 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pardon my ignorance.... 

message: There is absolutely no good reason why a search for the phrase "The Big E" should lead directly to this page.  A majority of people who know the phrase "The Big E" will associate it with USS Enterprise (Either CV-6 or CVN-65), and not some trade fair in one part of the US, given the historical importance of both vessels, and the great number of people who served on them, especially the latter.  Johnny Wishbone (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Big E" 

message: I don't know what the person who added that advertisement designation is reading, but listing important and unique characteristics of a large state fair seems like what ought to be in this page. It appears more as a personal attack at the content rather than an idea for substantive improvement. 2601:182:4300:14A0:BD7A:135:CE5E:1C5B (talk) 02:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of advertisement designation
Talk:KAKM

message: I see references on a number of Alaskan TV-related pages about commercial stations carrying Sesame Street, The Electric Company, etc.  I was recently reading an Alaskan reference volume from the 1960s, and it sure seems to me that the book hints that those stations received payment for airtime from federal monies channeled through school districts.  Anyone have any more concrete information before I go looking?
RadioKAOS (talk) 10:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: NET/PBS programs on Alaskan commercial stations
Talk:Matthew Jackson (EastEnders)

message: Why has this article suddenly become a target for repeated vandalism??? — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. Quite a random article to take umbrage with isn't it. Gungadin 22:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Colin Russell (EastEnders)

message: Maybe something here is of use - RAIN*the*ONE BAM 01:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Rod Norman

message: Is it "Rodric" or "Roderick"? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 00:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen the spelling "Rodric" before, otherwise I don't know. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 11:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont know either i'm afraid.Gungadin 15:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Adolphe Bridge

message: It would be nice to know who or what it's named after. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 13:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Teeny bit of an oversight on my part.  It's named after Grand Duke Adolphe. Bastin 18:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origin