lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:34th Street–Herald Square station

message: I was surprised that the public art is mentioned only the External links. I expected it to be a section in the article, with a photo. Public art is important in a transit facility, and this station had its work by a well-known artist. Just a thought. - -Prairieplant (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station art 

message: Sources here and here. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadway Line construction
Talk:34th Street–Penn Station (IND Eighth Avenue Line)

message: Do we have any new pictures of the platforms at this station? I just noticed the current image is photoshopped. Cards84664 19:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cards84664, the station looks much the same today as it does in :File:34th Street - Penn Station - Express platform.jpg and :File:34th Street-Penn Station.jpg. The only real changes were to the fare-control areas and the addition of electronic screens on the walls. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, thanks. Cards84664 01:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Photo
Talk:36th Street station (BMT Fourth Avenue Line)

message: The news broke out more than 2 years ago due to a video by Dean Peterson. I also saw the news about the staircase being blocked for repair after the video went viral. I think it would be safe to assume that the stair has already been fixed by now. However, I'm surprised that I can't find any follow-up news or updates on the repair progress. For example, when was the repair complete and the staircase reopened? How did they fix it? I remember reading a news article where a spokesman (or spokeswoman) said that raising or lowering a single stair/step would not be suffice and the entire staircase would need to be refurbished. That makes sense to me because doing that will affect the height of the adjacent steps.
Benjasmine (talk) 11:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has the trip-causing stair been fixed? 

message: Correct me if I'm wrong but it's this station right? Cards84664 13:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure. I'm hearing the incident occurred aboard the train, some victims were found in this station, and some victims hopped on another train to go to 25th Street. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely this station. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempted bombing
Talk:4 (New York City Subway service)

message: Since my edits were reverted without reason (which I do not like), I will explain why I did them.  Before, there were two sections for the New Lots Line service: one for late nights, the other for rush hours. The difference was: one section shows transfers during rush hours, the other section shows transfers during late nights–of which there is none. Since the two sections have been combined, I added "Rush hour transfers:" to show that the transfers are only when the 4 runs to New Lots Avenue at rush hours. (This rush hour service is unadvertised in the 4 schedule , that's another story.)
The rationale for having separate sections in the first place is to distinguish between day and night services. From Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation/New York City Subway/Lines#Day/night variants:
I did not know the above myself until I stumbled upon it now. I personally support consolidating the two sections, only if the reader would not be confused by the result. The "Rush hour transfers" is there to help the reader. Tinlinkin (talk) 11:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Lots Line transfers 

message: When you have a chance, can you fix the table in the 5 article and add Burnside express service and fix 138th Street skips here? I tried, but to no avail. Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , do you mean like this? epicgenius (talk) 22:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, thank you.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service pattern 

message: We should make clear that 86th Street is only accessible during late nights. How should we go about doing that? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I think we are better off excluding it for now. I don't have any ideas yet. epicgenius (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

text: , never mind. I found a solution, it is similar to how we treat Mets-Willets Point in the 7 train article. epicgenius (talk) 00:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADA access 

message: Let Me Edit 68.198.129.202 (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2022
Talk:Revolutionary People's Party (Turkey)

message: == Secession ==
DHP is a Turkish organisation but it was founded by PKK and always acted like a substitute of PKK and involved in secessionist actions.So I'm adding this article to Category:Secession in Turkey.--Hattusili 06:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Provide a source that it has been involved in secessionist actions. --Soman 07:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: DHP is a Turkish organisation but it was founded by PKK and always acted like a substitute of PKK and involved in secessionist actions.So I'm adding this article to Category:Secession in Turkey.--Hattusili 06:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Provide a source that it has been involved in secessionist actions. --Soman 07:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secession
Talk:42nd Street–Port Authority Bus Terminal station

message: The focus of the current picture is the BSOD and Duane Reade. You can barely make out the subway sign.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.221.211 (talk) 15:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs new picture

message: I think this page needs a rewrite. I think the edits made by 68.161.125.6 have valid reasons and I don't think you can copy and paste even if it is sourced.--IGeMiNix (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Above criticism is valid.  Substantial portions of this article were copied and pasted from this nycsubway.org page.  Also, no cites were given in the article body indicating that the text was sourced from that page. 
Please note at the bottom of the nycsubway.com page that it states "Copyright © 1995-2012 www.nycsubway.org" and "nycsubway.org is not affiliated with any transit agency or provider".  The nycsubway.org site is a privately run site, is not own or operated by a public transit agency, and is not public domain.  Additionally, their about the site page clearly states, "No part of this work may be copied or republished in electronic or printed form without prior approval of the respective copyright holder."
I rewrote much of the content and provided cites, so the page wouldn't just be outright plagiarism, but I also eliminated parts that still need to be replaced.  Please do not copy and paste from nycsubway.org to fill in missing information.  It is a violation of their copyright to do so.
Shelbystripes (talk) 07:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite Update
Talk:46th Street station (IND Queens Boulevard Line)

message: Okay, what is "HEET access"?  I don't see anything in the article that gives the rest of us any indication of what this means.  AdThanksVance.  Slambo (Speak) 18:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: High entrance-exit turnstile, I think. --NE2 05:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEET? 
Talk:47th–50th Streets–Rockefeller Center station

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Support. The proposed name (which was the original name) is consistent with the naming convention for all of the NYCS articles. The convention could be changed (if there's a good reason), but it shouldn't just be done on an ad hoc basis, one article at a time. Marc Shepherd 19:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: A paper I worked on this past year for school might be of interest. There was a lot of stuff I also didn't include in the sources I cite. Obviously, the paper couldn't be cited, but the sources could be used. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 02:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Unrelated, but this long thesis I worked on could form the basis of part of an article about the subway in the 70s. There is a lot of stuff I didn't end up using here: User:Kew Gardens 613/Subways70s80s--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 03:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Both these links are very helpful. Hopefully in the future, we can create an article about the subway in the late 20th century. – Epicgenius (talk) 05:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Arguably, there should also be one for Unification of the New York City Subway and many other subjects as well. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IND research
Talk:Sanka

message: It was the only coffee served on the titanic  -jdorwin
Can somebody add about the use of Coffee Sanka in France ? This is very American oriented...Knorrepoes 19:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

message: According to this article Sanka is a brand of instant coffee, and I have no reason to doubt this.  But when I was growing up, it was also available as a ground coffee product, brewed like any other brand.  Indeed, the article attests to this with its observation about orange coffee pot handles.  So what I wish the article included was when Sanka first became available as an instant, and (more importantly) when it was no longer available as a ground coffee. Unschool 18:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing History Info
Talk:511 Bathurst

message: I am wondering if it is valuable to include dates specifying closures of the route due to construction. There will always be construction at some point or another that shuts down streetcar service (namely track replacements that happen every couple of years), and it would clutter the page if we included it all. Perhaps construction/closures should be specified if only it is a project with significance (rare construction, significant upgrades, like pantograph compatibility, etc.)? GeoFryer (talk) 03:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally we shouldn't because it's against the project's purpose, which is that we are WP:NOTAGUIDE. —Joeyconnick (talk) 04:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value in noting route replacement with bus service
Talk:51st Street (IRT Lexington Avenue Line)

message: These two stations are connected to each other in system. Under this proposal, I suggest merging them into a single station page called Lexington Avenue - 53rd Street/51st Street (New York City Subway).
DReifGalaxyM31 (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal with [[Lexington Avenue – 53rd Street (IND Queens Boulevard Line)]]
Talk:53rd Street station (BMT Fourth Avenue Line)

message: The station is closed from March 27th 2017 to October 2017 as part of The 2015-2019 Capital program Brandonq721 (talk) 00:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  53 street BMT 4th Avenue line 
Talk:57th Street station (IND Sixth Avenue Line)

message: Hello! M trains are currently only using the downtown track at 57th Street to terminate. The uptown track is currently blocked with a blue wall. The layout has M trains using both tracks to terminate when they're only using one track. 2603:7000:D0F0:89A0:B15E:6994:7760:906 (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform Layout
Talk:59th Street–Columbus Circle station

message: What happened here des any one know what happened here that the polikce had to come and what it looks like iss that they shut down the entrancees to the columbus circle subway station, I thnik they took care about it by now but does anyone know what happended?
Doorknob747 (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like your typical manhole explosion, which is not really that uncommon. Please don't put this on the article again. 67.84.106.13 (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today at Columbus circle subway station 

message: I tried (maybe poorly) to fix what I thought was some ambiguity to a layperson coming to this article. I still think it's unclear, as there are a lot of assumptions being made about what the reader will know about the NYC subway system; i.e. "Southbound local" and "southbound express" refer to 8th Avenue local and 8th Avenue express, respectively. The station doesn't have any tracks for the Sixth Avenue Line, and the notation "(incoming)" is not clear." I know it's true, but is there any quickly-readable (by a newcomer) piece of text that explains why this is the case? Tduk (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it really need the "express/local" text at all? It might be enough to simply have the text up there and the reader will have to look elsewhere to learn more. Tduk (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Express text on track layout
Talk:6 (New York City Subway service)

message: The font rendering on the map is a mess. I don't know if the same problem affects other NYC transit maps as this was the only one I landed on.216.99.57.111 (talk) 02:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They are all bad, but it gets the point across. Locations are also stated in the article anyways.--iGeMiNix 04:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't feel like the current Morrison Avenue – Soundview and Whitlock Avenue articles describe the new stations, especially living near and using the former of the two frequently. Should they be updated to describe the new look of the stations?
~kiddRell_ (talk) 03:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, if you are near those stations frequently, feel free to update them to the most current description of what they are now.--iGeMiNix 15:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

text: What IGeMiNix said; GO FOR IT! ;-) Acps110 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morrison Av-Soundview & Whitlock Av
Talk:63rd Street Tunnel

message: https://www.nycsubway.org/wiki/The_Construction_of_the_Harlem_River_Tubes_(1915)
The IRT Lexington Avenue subway crossing under the Harlem River was built in 1915 by sinking prefabricated sections. Rather then go off on a tangent I simply removed the statement that the 63rd Street tunnel was built unlike all other underwater crossings in NYC. It may be interesting to know that it is only the second case, but before you write that in, please check how the Harlem River crossing of the IND Concourse line was built (I do not know). JoeBrennan (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction methods
Talk:66th Street–Lincoln Center station

message: The new edit about aggressive students on the subways seems like recent news minutiae.  Do we really need it?--Knulclunk (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  agressive subways 
Talk:69th Street station (IRT Flushing Line)

message: The stop is/has been named 69th Street-Fisk Ave yet runs along Roosevelt Ave.  Any history on the name? MartinezMD (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fisk Ave 
Talk:75th Avenue station

message: Can someone please explain why the article has the same information in three different sections? The lede, station layout, and ridership sections all say the same thing, that the F train stops here at all times while the E stops here on nights and weekends.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.3.79.199 (talk) 22:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetitive information 
Talk:81st Street–Museum of Natural History station

message: seems a direct lift from http://www.amnh.org/museum/subway/release.html ViniTheHat (talk) 13:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  arts fro transit section copyvio 

message: In the conversion from 191.2 million dollars in 1932 to 2021 dollars, wouldn't that just be $3.7974 billion? Ellis1986 (talk) 05:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  $3,797.4 million?
Talk:96th Street station (IRT Lexington Avenue Line)

message: A picture of a the mosaics described here would be nice.  Also, this article on its own seems fairly useless.  It appears to be a small detail of another article. Chapium 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is an old message, but is the one David Shankbone added acceptable? Because if it is, I'll just remove the image request parameter. ----DanTD (talk) 00:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll say that it's acceptable. It shows the two "96" identification mosaics in place of the usual "96th Street" ones. Only issue is, which platform is it, southbound or northbound? Tinlinkin (talk) 01:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Acton Town tube station

message: Normally Eastbound Piccadilly line trains don't call at Turnham Green; they run fast to Hammersmith instead. Can this be changed to show that? Or would we have to write a note beneath it? Anywikiuser (talk) 16:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, eastbound Piccadilly line trains do stop at Turnham Green at the start and end of the day. See my references for details. Vincent60030 (talk) 13:32, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnham Green 

message: I remember seeing a map drawn in the Tube map-style, which showed how the tracks are between Chiswick Park or Acton Town, Northfields/Sth Ealing and Ealing Cmn/Bdy. Can anyone help me with this? 85.166.18.209 (talk) 19:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Track layout map

message: Hovering over the link the blurb says 'South Acton tube station' - the actual article refers to the railway station. Clarification? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:50, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the same station. At one time it was served by both Underground trains and "normal" trains, which used the same platforms; since 1959, with the cessation of the District line shuttle from Acton Town, South Acton has not been on the Underground network. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Mildly puzzling for those of us who only know it as a railway station. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: South Acton station
Talk:Admiralty station (MTR)

message: I believe the trains move in opposite directions on each level (except for the new South Island Line). The diagram shows the opposite.
Thanks,
VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 12:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct; one set of the Island Line tracks' arrows appear to be in the wrong direction. Thanks for spotting that! Jc86035 (talk) Use to reply to me 13:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem =D VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 13:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong diagram showing platform layout 

message: Are there any citations that state that the station's ownership is divided up? There could be other possibilities – e.g. some kind of lease agreement between MTR and KCR. Citobun (talk) 11:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is uncertain exactly what parts of the station belong to which company, but it is certain according to sources that the Sha Tin to Central Link is built by the MTRCL but belongs to the KCRC , and the MTRC is only awarded the operational rights to the SCL part of MTRCL. While it is uncertain how exactly the property is divided, it can be confirmed that parts of the station is owned by the KCRC. The infobox does not require as much detail, so I think that would be sufficient to just keep the detail that KCRC owns part of the station. LuciferianThomas 12:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership of station
Talk:Aeroport (Moscow Metro)

message: As far as I know, currently there is no regular bus service to any of Moscow's airports from Aerovokzal. Actually, despite its name, Aerovokzal has lost any connection with air transport. There are a mall and a bus station there.--achp (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aerovokzal 
Talk:Harold Hughes

message: The "Life" section of this article needs to be cleaned up in order to comply with Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --TommyBoy 06:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: There is no mention of when or whether he graduated from SUI nor what he studied there.  Also there is no mention of his high school.CountMacula (talk) 09:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 
Talk:AirTrain (San Francisco International Airport)

message: Should this article really by tagged for both WikiProject Rapid Transit and WikiProject Trains?  The first one seems to put it in the parent project as well.  Upgraded WPCalif assessment to Start.--Hjal (talk) 08:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProjects 

message: A graphic designer needs to fix this map!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Native94080 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AirTrain route map is wrong 
Talk:Albert Stanley, 1st Baron Ashfield

message: The article is very well written and informative.PDCP (talk) 17:44, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article 
Talk:Aldgate East tube station

message: For consistency with other London Underground station resitings (see Mark_Lane_tube_station, British_Museum_tube_station, Park_Royal_%26_Twyford_Abbey_tube_station), the old Aldgate East station should have its own entry. Bennunn (talk) 20:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: The last paragraph of the Hammersmith & City Line section doesn't seem to make sense.
If it is saying that there's no regular Circle Line service through the station, then this could be made clearer by creating a new Circle Line section and putting the paragraph in there. Mdrb55 (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circle Line?
Talk:Line 3 (Kharkiv Metro)

message: I think the correct spelling of this line is Oleksiyivska. Solarapex (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ampere Way tram stop

message: Upon travelling on the Tramlink on 1 March 2008 I spotted that IKEA Ampere Way had reverted back to its previous name - the IKEA version of the name on the platforms had been stickered over and on board announcements changed back to the previous version.  As such, I have reverted references of IKEA Ampere Way back to Ampere Way.
At the time of writing, Transport for London's website hasn't received updated maps with the new name.
Bods (talk) 11:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IKEA Ampere Way name reverted
Talk:Angrignon station

message: Could someone add the details of the new electric bus charging station? Ditto for the one at the other end. Peter Horn User talk 18:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electric bus charging station 
Talk:Aquarium station (MBTA)

message: Is there any reason that the station is called Aquarium/Financial District on this page? I rode the blue line in from Wonderland many a time and never saw or heard any sort of indication that the financial district was part of the name. 76.102.50.71 (talk) 06:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (Note: this was fixed in April 2010.) Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussion
Talk:Aqueduct–North Conduit Avenue station

message: The insert in this map indicates that the Long Island Rail Road station that was replaced was originally named South Woodhaven (LIRR station). Any record on when the name was changed? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  15:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old LIRR names 