Talk:Adiaphora

message: Latitudinarianism is probably at best a poor addition to the lead paragraph of this article. Latitudinarianism was a philosophy which was not limited to ecclesiastical practice, but also extended to matters of doctrine and faith, citing the Holy Spirit’s combination with human reason as sufficient basis for truth. “Adiaphora,” on the other hand (especially in Christianity), is not a term used for a philosophy, but rather a term used for the matters themselves which are considered nonessential faith matters. It is possible to be a Christian who believes in the existence of adiaphora without being a latitudinarian. Therefore, it would be improper to insinuate that adiaphora and latitudianiarism are somehow related in essence. Perhaps a section later on in the article focusing on latitudinarianism (which certainly deals with matters of adiaphora) would be appropriate. Cognate247 (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, I buy your argument. I've started a section as you suggested because I think there is a connection, but as you argue, it's not a strong connection. 75.15.197.101 (talk) 17:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latitudiarianism 

message: Under the section Adiaphoristic Controversy in Lutheranism, the Augsburg Confession is referred to thus:
The Lutheran Augsburg Confession states that "the true unity of the Church it is enough to agree concerning the doctrine of the Gospel and the administration of the Sacraments. Nor is it necessary that human traditions, that is, rites or ceremonies, instituted by men, should be everywhere alike."
(My use of quotation marks here, to assist formatting this Talk page only.)
The fragment "the true unity of the Church" needs completion.  The second sentence with "Nor" suggests to modern readers that the first should also be a negative construction.  (e.g., "No-one should consider that for ...").  However, it's likely that both sentences are intended to be permissive (e.g., if "Regarding" was substituted).  Obviously the source itself should provide the answer.
Wistful (talk) 15:13, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lutheran Augsburg Confession: insufficient quote for meaning 

message: "religious liberty" links to this topic, but this topic contains nothing of relevance to the constant repetition of the term "religious liberty" used fallaciously in the contemporary public debate.  This might be the formal term for the subject, but to the layman I don't get it - my late father the preacher might get this, but not I even after decades of church.  Mulp (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: shouldn't "religious liberty" link to religious freedom? Mulp (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about Religious Liberty in common use? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adiaphora. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040904170606/http://www.ctsfw.edu/etext/boc/fc/ to http://www.ctsfw.edu/etext/boc/fc/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040810085001/http://www.ctsfw.edu/etext/boc/ac/ to http://www.ctsfw.edu/etext/boc/ac/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The redirect Christian liberty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Christian liberty]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Liberty, Christian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Liberty, Christian]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Christian freedom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Christian freedom]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]