Talk:Marie of Romania

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Marie of Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140415155000/http://www.muzeulcotroceni.ro/engleza/istoric_eng.html to http://www.muzeulcotroceni.ro/engleza/istoric_eng.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131217224818/http://www.historia.ro/node/65 to http://www.historia.ro/node/65
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 82.132.242.22, 82.132.220.66, 82.132.225.90, 82.132.234.35 or whatever you call yourself, please try to understand the following:
*Revert-warring is not allowed, and will be sanctioned by administrative intervention;
*Blogs are not reliable sources, even if they are hosted on the websites of long-defunct royal houses. Particularly for articles on prominent historical figures, sources of a higher caliber are expected - books, articles, newspaper reports.
Are we clear? - Biruitorul Talk 21:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: These 82.132.etc IPs are sock puppets of persistent block evader User:Qais13 (blocked for persistent hoaxing). They can therefore be undone under Wikipedia:Edit warring#Exemptions #3. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legion of Honour claim 

message: The Romanian IP 213.233… denies that Princess Ileana was ever called Mrs Issarescu. There are multiple citations that say she was:
*'"Mrs. Stefan Issarescu, the Princess Ileana of Rumania, will be the guest of honor", The New York Times, October 19, 1954
*"Ileana Issarescu and her six children ... Dr. Stefan Issarescu, the husband of Mrs. Issarescu", United States Congressional serial set, Volume 11904, 1956
*"Mrs Issarescu", Reyes con y sin corona [Kings Without Thrones] by Geoffrey Bocca, 1962 [translation of 1959 original (the English language version is not available online)]
*"Issarescu v. Issarescu". 82 Nev. 239, 239 (1966) [Her divorce proceedings]
*From her OWN mouth: "My name is Ileana, Princess of Rumania, and Mrs. Issarescu, and I live in Newton, 30 Hyde Avenue.", Testimony of Princess Ileana of Rumania to the United States Senate, 1956
This is just a selection of the available citations online. There are of course more in print.
She had many names during her life (Princess Ileana of Romania, Archduchess Anton of Austria, Ileana Habsburg, Mrs Issarescu, Mother Alexandra), too many to list in the infobox. So, we should only give the clearest, easiest and most relevant one: Princess Ileana. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mrs Issarescu 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The article states that Marie met the future Queen Elizabeth in 1934. This is not true. Elizabeth is pictured with her in a christening photo of her grandson, Crown Prince Peter, in 1923. Here is the photo: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/572660908849527416/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.202.192.102 (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to even start making sense, your objection would have to account for the fact that Elizabeth was born in 1926, so presumably was not appearing in photographs in 1923. - Biruitorul Talk 14:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo is quite clear. Here's a better link: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/in-september-1923-king-alexander-1st-of-serbia-queen-news-photo/105216780. You're thinking of another Elizabeth. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! Well, I checked the source, which refers to 1923 not 1934, and modified the text accordingly. I hope everything is now cleared up. - Biruitorul Talk 15:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meeting future Queen Elizabeth 

message: Regarding this: I have removed it, per MOS:POPCULT generally, with specific justifications below.
In terms of the film, we cannot simply stick in a blind link to IMDB. If we must mention it (incidentally, it was dreadful), I suggest finding a review or something and putting it in the preceding section. Though I would maybe first start an article on the film, provided it’s actually notable.
The book really sounds like trivia, until and unless it gains some notoriety. No, the link to Penguin Random House cannot stay; we are not in the business of sending readers to buy products from particular vendors.
The fact that some English university held a silly event about Marie and vampires? Trivia of the most blatant sort, not worth recording. Finally, the place to write more about the castle is at… Bran Castle, not here. — Biruitorul Talk 04:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation regarding MOS:POPCULT. I’m fine moving the discussion of the castle and its folklore to the castle’s page. But the film and novel about Marie both belong here in a popular culture discussion. I’ve added connecting prose and some stronger secondary sources and have reverted this section.LingLass (talk) 16:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture section

message: i did the portrait of Queen Marie of Romania 1924 by Philip de lászló the artist painter but it get deleted because it wasn’t like that before — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.1.223 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved.  Celia Homeford (talk) 11:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Marie of Romania →  – Reliable sources use this term and consistency with other queens such as Queen Anne of Romania. Interstellarity (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 October 2022 

message: The redirect Marie of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and United Kingdom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  estar8806 (talk) ★ 17:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Marie of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and United Kingdom]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Shouldn't the title be "Marie of Edinburgh" to match "Mary of Teck" (queen consort of the UK) and "Maud of Wales" (queen consort of Norway" 95.150.39.37 (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title