lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phomopsis cane and leaf spot

message: There is an article, a stub, at Phomopsis that would complement the information here. --Bejnar (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, there are two different fungi, Eutypa and Phomopsis, so we have two stubs, telling the same.--Josef Papi (talk) 20:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Dead arm (grapes) should be merged into Phomopsis -- phomopsis is a much broader topic, and dead arm is but one disease on one type of plant of that topic. TeamZissou (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternatively, these should remain separate articles since dead arm is part of wikiproject grapes.TeamZissou (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the same than TeamZizzou. Phomopsis is a genus of fungi that includes several species, not only the infective agent that causes Dead arm. Therefore, Dead arm should be merged into Phomopsis, as a section, or maybe they should be kept both articles separated. Flakinho (talk) 19:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger of Phomopis
Talk:Ercole Spada

message: The BMW 7-series E32 was not designed by Ercole Spada, but by Claus Luthe, then head of design at BMW and the former creator of the NSU Ro80.
But Spada did design the 5-series E34.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.24.32.36 (talk) 13:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wally Bryson

message: As per WP:BANDMEMBER, it isn't sufficient enough that a band or bands the individual is/was part of is notable, as it can't be WP:INHERITED notability. There needs to be sufficient WP:SIGCOV of the individual to assert notability independent of their band affiliation. I have had a skim of historic newspapers and I am struggling to find coverage that would equate to being significant (many passing mentions, but little I could use in the article). Bungle (talk • contribs) 10:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Matchmaker (How I Met Your Mother)

message: Is the cockamouse noteworthy enough to merit its own article?  
SonPraises (talk) (contributions) 05:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cockamouse
Talk:Cholo (video game)

message: Any improvements on this article would be welcome, in particular the robot identification chart (which I'm afraid I lost years ago) and more details on the game itself, it's been a long time :/ Hideki (talk) 14:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed you've uploaded the city map under a free licence, as the creator of the work; did you actually draw the original map, and did British Telecom give you back the rights to it once the game was out of the shops? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Ford Durashift

message: I am 99.9% sure that DURASHIFT doesn't only apply to autos these days, the Ford UK website uses the durashift title for an obviously fully manual 6 speed transmission in the new Ford Mondeo and that is just for starters.
CartmanUK26 15:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT JUST AUTOS ANYMORE 
Talk:Car seat

message: Perhaps the alternative can be mentioned aswell: no seat at all; with just a special seat belt to hold someone anchored to the vehicle chassis  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.176.221.172 (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative

message: Drop Stop is heavily padded with unnecessary detail about the rather basic operation of this thing that stops stuff from falling down between your seats. We don't need a complete list of every talk show that mentioned this alongside various new products. A sentence explaining why the thing is colored black is a sentence wasted. We know it's shadowy down there. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: A seat similat to a truck suspension seat appears also to be used on large buses and transit buses. Peter Horn User talk 23:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The use of a suspension seat 

message: In my opinion, the hyperlink to the 'Ergonomics' page on a tab in this article should be removed and instead a link to the 'Ergonomics' page should be put into the 'See also' section as in my opinion the tab would look more presentable without the link. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 13:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to 'Ergonomics' page on tab should be removed
Talk:Car platform

message: A new article, Automotive platform sharing, has been created, and it seems a likely candidate for merger into this already-existing article, which is in need of expansion, anyway. Opinions welcome. Deor (talk) 22:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As this is a student project, and Wikipedia is NOT a valid webhosting service, merge is the kindest fate we can give this. ThuranX (talk) 23:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - if we can salvage anything from that article it should be merged here. Hut 8.5 06:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well. It should be merged as soon as someone is available to do it.Mathman1550 (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree — The material in the new Automotive platform sharing article is a subset of this existing article. — CZmarlin (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Support merger - this is better than most of the articles created as part of the student project, but I don't think it's worthy of its own page. Could be useful here though. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree completely, even though the result is still only going to be a stub. 67.130.129.135 (talk) 00:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: I think it would be intresting to swap either the BLS or the 9-3 for a picture of the FIAT Croma. Its on the same platform but is more different than these two (Which are more closely related than most of the cars on the platform. Just a thought.(90.211.169.128 (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLS, 9-3, Vectra 

message: I know this isn't the right sections but GM Ford VW Nissan etc have topics about their platforms but I don't think Honda has one. and I can't create one I don't know near enough about them to do so. plus not a registered member and what not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.235.89.234 (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honda needs a platform list section 

message: Should a separate page be created for Automobile modular architecture or should it just be a separate section under Automobile platform? Some examples would be Volvo Scalable Product Platform, Toyota New Global Architecture, Volkswagen Group MQB platform, and Volkswagen Group MLB platform Regards! VX1NG (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would start with a section (with appropriate redirects), and split it out into a separate page if necessary later. OSX (talk • contributions) 07:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automobile modular architecture
Talk:Half shaft

message: The term "half shaft" is an industry term for a drive axle, most commonly used when discussing front wheel drive vehicles; in that sense, it is often also called a drive shaft as this article initially indicated.  On rear wheel drive vehicles with rigid differential mounting and independent rear suspension, all (or at least most) axles are half shafts.
I don't personally thing there is enough subject matter to discuss half shafts as an independent page when they are simply drive axles, and the drive axle section on the axle page is so short as is.  I believe this page should be merged or simply redirected to the drive axle section on the axle page until there is more material.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.195.236 (talk) 19:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. The item described here is just another name for a driveshaft. Merge with driveshaft IMO -ALLOCKE|talk 22:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal

message: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigkurt/3040421030/ has a free image of a half shaft. 
someone willing to upload and link it to here? (I don't have the time... so much for the still missing wysiwy... ux) פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 00:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  free image
Talk:Locking hubs

message: The article does not mention the severely detrimental effect that a locking, limited-slip or spool-type front differential has on the steering of a vehicle, which is another very important factor that locking hubs alleviate in normal, high traction situations. I'd make the edit myself but I can't figure out a way to squeeze it in without wrecking the structure of the first and second paragraphs.
108.181.141.93 (talk) 04:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited-slip
Talk:Type Four platform

message: The backstage story of the SAAB - italian car commodity is that SAAB handed over the designs for its cancelled light attack jetplane project to Italy, which eventually reached manufacture as the AMX aircraft. In turn Italy paid SAAB with a ready to make car design and tooling, that really made profit. Both parties were happy with the balance of business. (At that time Sweden's SAAB AB was a unitary company, comprising both aviation and road-mobile business interests and only split up years later.) 82.131.210.163 (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The flight from Sweden to Italy and back. 

message: This article is about all cars using this platform. Im not sure Fiat made platforms for Saab? -->Typ932 T·C 13:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturer 

message: Because they were very similar, many parts can be exchanged between the four cars regardless of brand. For example, the doors from the Fiat Croma fit directly on the 9000. However, because Saab fitted heavier side impact protection they will not fit. 
I find this rather confusing. Would the Fiat doors fit into a SAAB or would it not fit. Or is the intended meaning a FIAT door fit into a SAAB, but a SAAB door does not fit into a FIAT? I kind of assume the later, but it is not 100% clear from the sentences. Sijambo (talk) 21:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear meaning of doors
Talk:High energy ignition

message: This article begins by defining HEI as a coil-in-cap distributor. But later, it mentions a common version with a remote coil.  The coil-in-cap design is a defining characteristic of the DUI system, but is not specific to either the GM HEI system, or any aftermarket HEI-type systems (although it IS common in them).  The defining characteristic of HEI is the maximum energy level of the spark (as the name implies) as distinguished from earlier high-resistance low-efficiency coils (regardless of their location). Steve8394 (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEI vs DUI
Talk:Dynaflow

message: This has the be the most ridiculous sentence I've ever read in a Wikipedia article: "Arguably, a Buick 'family car' wouldn’t fare well during the teenage son’s weekly 'date night Friday' outings." This is unsourced POV nonsense. In fact, the entire article appears to be 90 percent unsourced. Sd31263 (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculous sentence
Talk:Saab B engine

message: How could the B engine have replaced a 2-stroke engine in the 99?
The 96 had a three cylinder two stroke engine, which was replaced by a ford V4 engine, but the 99, in which the B engine was found, never had a two troke engine.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.73.205.198 (talk) 14:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 stroke?
Talk:Hyundai Theta engine

message: I removed the following line as it is just not true.
"Genesis Coupe" is a show car disguised as a concept.
Also the official spec of the production car has not been released. 
"A turbocharged version of the Theta engine is expected to appear in the base model of the Genesis Coupe, producing 215hp and 217 torque "
I saw on  that this engine is also used in the Kia KOUP concept with 290HP and 289lb-ft.  Sixthstar (talk) 02:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mercedes-Benz M115 engine

message: Since all the listed models lack the "E" suffix, I presume all these engines were carburettor fuelled, rather than injected? We could mention this. (The Mercedes-Benz M102 engine article links to this one with a slightly unclear "compare" comment. It'd be good to clarify that the difference is that the M102 sometimes had injection, if this is a major area of difference between them.) – Kieran T (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aspiration
Talk:Phaeton body

message: The word Pheaton usually refers to a (pre WW2) 4 door convertable automobile.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.229.28.23 (talk) 12:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage

message: The Mercedes-Benz Ocean Drive is a phaeton.
View on NetCarShow  —Preceding unsigned comment added by XsandaOS (talk • contribs) 09:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly speaking it is that now very rare (new) thing a four-door convertible (wind-up sidewindows) and not a phaeton - but then how many people mind about that, it looks very nice. Anyway who would buy a car without sidewindows? Eddaido (talk) 09:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New Phaeton Concept
Talk:Valve float

message: This might be a better post on a engine forum, but is the only way to compensate for valve float to increase spring force or to decrease the rpm of the engine? Does the spring force have to equal the inertia force required for the valve stem follower to remain in contact with the cam? I also think that this information would be appropriate in this article.--IanVG (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valve Float as a Consequence of Excessive Inertia Force
Talk:Longitudinal engine

message: :An engine similarly mounted along the frame of a motorcycle is called an in-line engine.
This is incorrect; inline engines refer to cylinder arrangement, car or motorcycle, and the orientation is called longitudinal, car or motorcycle. In the transverse engine article, there are three citations specifically showing motorcycle engine orientations being describe using these same terms. The Motorcycle Encyclopedia entry from the first citation must be an error and the second citation is simply being misread, as it refers to the S7's cylinder configuration.
Even if someone, somewhere, at some time, referred to longitudinal motorcycle engines as inline, this isn't the convention used among motorcyclists and would cause confusion with the term used for cylinder arrangement; imagine a Ducati being referred to as an "inline V twin." I'm deleting the above quoted line.
CrinklyCrunk (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-line engine 

message: Are rotary Wankel & radial engines not usually aligned longitudinally? Daimler Ben (talk) 06:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If you base that on their crankshaft orientation, then yes.  Radials are very rare though (except in US tanks of WWII) and there are nearly as many with the crankshaft either vertical, or a rotary radial engine mounted in a motorbike wheel. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unconventional engines
Talk:Bench seat

message: I think automobile manufacturers should have a resurgence of bench seating since ridesharing has become a more widespread campaign. --Boxstaa (talk) 06:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

message: spotted http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/04/order-your-1967-camaro-with-a-bench-front-seat-to-go-with-the-column-shifter/ supporting the song which was in the first version of this article: Redhanker (talk) 06:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages
Talk:Flat-eight engine

message: From Talk:Flat-6:
Flat-8 engines would be even better, because in the boxer configuration the secondary vibrations of the two straight-4 banks will cancel each other, there are no tertiary vibrations, and all you are left with is an intrinsic quaternary vibration which should be insignificant. But nobody has a problem with the tertiary vibrations of the flat-6 (which are themselves very expensive to build), so nobody bothers with flat-8s. They are sometimes used in racing engines, but racers are not concerned with a few vibrations, so they usually use the non-boxer or 180° V8 layout in which opposing pistons share crank journals. In this case the two banks reinforce rather than cancel the secondary imbalances, and the engine has a rather nasty side-to-side vibration at twice crankshaft speed. They just use lots of lock washers, secure all the fasteners very well, and hope the engine doesn't shake the car to pieces at high speed.RockyMtnGuy (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very smooth engine?
Talk:Lodgic

message: A note on notability: in terms of WP:MUSIC, Lodgic does not quite make notability under 5 ("Has released two or more albums on a major label"), having only had the one album on A&M Records, but they are notable under 6 ("Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable") given that Billy Sherwood, Michael Sherwood, Guy Allison, Jimmy Haun and World Trade all have their own articles. Bondegezou 11:56, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:GM Roto Hydramatic transmission

message: Boy, was this a lousy transmission!
For those of you who have a 1961-64 Pontiac or Oldsmobile and are fed up with this piece of junk, I believe there are now conversion kits where you can replace it with a Turbo-Hydramatic 350; if you search around, there are even some garages that do this; I would assume they would mostly be in California, obviously.
Satchmo Sings (talk) 03:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roto-Hydramatic 

message: Since this article lacks any sources or references, & really doesn't seem to be of much interest to anyone, shouldn't it be deleted, with any relevant or interesting information worked into articles on related topics? 69.42.21.9 (talk) 03:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete?
Talk:Saab V8

message: One of the prototype engines is on display at the Linnavuori factory museum in Finland. // Liftarn (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Benwick

message: It may be useful to refer to this link when making future edits to Benwick. Bogbumper (talk) 21:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: How to write an article about a settlement

message: The section in the article titled "Benwick publications" reads like a piece of advertising. What would be useful to have the books mentioned in a "further reading" section, or even used as references in the article, so that a reader can search them out or more information on them for themselves if they think they may be useful. Nev1 (talk) 23:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed all of the advertorial stuff, as I really didn't think it was appropriate. --Malleus Fatuorum 00:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Benwick publications
Talk:Choke valve

message: I think the lead section of this article is more than a summary and duplicates much of the information in the following sections. I will try to correct this. Biscuittin (talk) 22:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Why was the reference to State International Engineering Use of choke valves in the oil industry restored?  The referenced page provides no information - it is just advertising.  
If there are relevant external references to choke valves in the oil and gas industry I would be very interested to see them added - it was their use in that industry that caused me to look for this article in the first instance.AJTH (talk) 03:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External reference restored - why? 

message: Choke valves on a wellhead, etc.--86.12.160.194 (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other industries
Talk:ZF S6-650 transmission

message: This should not be deleted.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 23:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources? Abductive (reasoning) 00:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Depending on what the economy does and how GM and Ford react, this WILL be the last manual these guys run in the heavy trucks.   Manual transmissions have the potential to get completely phased out and this transmission is the best example of the beginning of this movement.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?

message: This is not the last manual transmission ford or dodge offered, that would be the Tremec TR-4050 Coolcraftnet18 (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Transmission
Talk:Toyota KZ engine

message: I have proof of this engine being originally in this model of the hilux thanks to an individual i know having this exact model and variant. Should i post an image of the truck's engine certificate plate under the hood as proof or in an internet link unrelated to the truck i mentioned? NeroWT (talk) 15:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1KZ-TE Engines were used in South American (In this Case Argentinean) Toyota hilux(s) "SRV 3.0TD 4x4" from the year 2003-2004-2005
Talk:Automotive package

message: I reckon (mmmhmmm ;) ) it would be kinda interesting making a list of the different naming schemes of car brands, eg. explaining that Honda usually has the DX, LX, SE and EX trims, and what these mean. Maybe someone knows about other brands?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessandro Malfatti (talk • contribs) 07:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Different names

message: I propose that Automotive package be merged into Trim level (automobile). The reason is that I think it would be easier for the casual if the articles are trim packages are consolidated into one article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 07:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal