lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trichogramma

message: The second link is broken (the Trichogramma Article one) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.49.93.210 (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link 

message: The symbiotic use of Wollbachia is more important to this article than the article on Wollbachia. I suggest that the section about this wasp be moved here and expanded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.15.228 (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper article linking 

message: The word "chorion" is defined in the online Merriam-Webster dictionary, and the American Heritage dictionary, does not include the sense of "a membrane on the outside of some insect eggs." It is defined as such in the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2nd Edition, but it is labeled as a technical term used in biology. Thus using it here is not appropriate. The Wikipedia style sheet instructs authors to avoid technical terms. Nick Beeson (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chorion 

message: Hello BlueBioBill!
I found your section under the Trichogramma wasps page under Wolbachia to be very informative and well written. One topic that I didn't understand quite well was the following sentence
By transmitting the bacterium to the wasp’s offspring, Wolbachia has given the infected females reproductive advantage over the uninfected females. 
Could you elaborate on what advantages this bacterium actually transmits to offspring of the wasps? I'm curious as to whether the reproductive advantage is allowing the wasps to reproduce more successfully because of some mechanistic advantage or a genetic alteration? 
I particularly liked your section on parthenogenesis. Perhaps some of the information i'm looking for could be found in that section. 
Honey4bees (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 21:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: classmate edit question
Talk:Thesaban

message: See Talk:Amphoe Hat Yai - is there any Thai website which shows complete lists of all the thesaban with their current status? The best I know so far is the annual statistics at DOPA - but there we have to wait for one year till we see any status changes or newly created thesaban. andy 11:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With quite some delay the Royal Gazette (http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/RKJ/announce/search.jsp) is the authoritative source - but especially for the thesaban the publication of the changes takes up to a year after being effective.  andy (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

text: The latest changes are documented in meeting transcripts which are published on the website of the Legal Affairs Bureau. But in these they are in between lots of other things discussed by this board (the one responsible for the thesaban is number 2), I am trying to create digests with only the municipal changes in a special blog. andy (talk) 16:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Up-to-date list of thesaban

message: We need a citation for the requirements for a thesaban tambon. The current law says only that it must be declared a thesaban tambon by the Ministry of Interior. But I assume the Ministry of Interior has more specific requirements, probably issued as a ประกาศ, which is why I haven't found the right file in the Royal Gazette yet. --rikker (talk) 12:54, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The requirements for Thesaban Tambon might not been codified by law, but just have been guidelines for the board to decide on the setup of new subdistrict municipalities. There are two contradicting numbers floating around - one source  gives a number of 1500/km², the paper Recentralising while Decentralising: Centre-Local Relations and CEO Governors in Thailand says 500/km². The first source also states: There is no law specifying the number or density of population of an area to be upgraded as a Tambon Municipality except a broad outline saying it has to. But of course a citation for such a guideline and also the changes made to this guideline in the past 50 years would be great. Especially as most of the TAO upgraded to municipalities in the last two years don't fulfill the population density and sometimes even fail the population number requirement. andy (talk) 13:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thesaban Tambon requirements
Talk:James Shankar Singh

message: Percentage of votes for each party in Indian Communal Electorates:
 Indian Communal Electorates 
Year          	NFP	Alliance
1966          	64 	15
1968          	77 	21
1972          	73 	24
March 1977    	73 	16
September 1977	85 	14
1982          	83 	15
1987          	82 	15
Note that in 1966 there were a large number of independent candidates including James Shankar Singh who is not included in the above but was an Alliance supporter.
In September 1977 the Alliance, in at least in the Lautoka seat supported the Flower candidate (Jai Ram Reddy) against the Dove candidate (Sidiq Koya). Hence in this election the Alliance's Indian vote is lower than normal and NFP's (which is actually the total of Flower and Dove votes is higher than normal.
In general the NFP Indian votes gradually increased to stabilize at 83%, whereas Alliance's Indian votes decreased to stabilize at around 15%
In 1987 NFP was in coalition with labour
===Reference===
::Thanks for that.  I thought I read somewhere that the Alliance vote among Indians rose to 24 percent in 1982, but that source must have been confusing it with 1972.  David Cannon 11:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ::Thanks for that.  I thought I read somewhere that the Alliance vote among Indians rose to 24 percent in 1982, but that source must have been confusing it with 1972.  David Cannon 11:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:Manasses

message: Because of the growing confusion among the various pages, I WP:BOLDly merged content from Manasses and Manasseh into this page (Manasses (given name)). There was a large amount of duplication. Manasses is now a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to this page, and Manasses (disambiguation) will hold all the entries that are not given names. Menashe (surname) has not been changed or moved.
I removed the content that was not about people's names and took it to the appropriate article talk pages: Tribe of Manasseh and Prayer of Manasseh. I have also updated the list of people with the given name; I was not certain if some of the variations belonged here, but put them in anyway. Please  me if you need to know more. — Gorthian (talk) 08:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged articles
Talk:Trisodium citrate

message: The molecular mass of 294,1 refers to sodium citrate in 2xH2O...
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.254.181.182 (talk) 08:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the introductory paragraph, this sentence occurs: "For this reason, citrates of certain Alkaline and Alkaline Earth metals (e.g. sodium and calcium citrates) are commonly known as sour salt (occasionally citric acid is erroneously termed sour salt)."  Which clearly implies that citric acid is not an alternative name for sodium citrate.  But in the right sidebar, "citric acid" is listed as one of the alternative names for sodium citrate.
This would make sense only if the sidebar is listing an erroneous alternative name for sodium citrate.   I don't think listing an erroneous name for something is a good idea.   Or at least if an erroneous name is listed, it ought to be marked as erroneous in order to avoid confusion.Daqu 11:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Done. 99.224.95.88 21:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparent contradiction re terminology
Talk:Loop braid group

message: This article is describing an object that doesn't have a standard name in mathematics or physics.  Moreover, it does not even give a proper definition of the object -- taken literally the given definition is wrong.   The article should either be fixed or deleted as it's not informative.  Other names for similar objects are things like group of motions of the n-component unlink or loop group or Dahm group or Dahm motion group of unlinks, fundamental group of the space of n-component unlinks etc. Related but different concepts are such things as braid groups, wicket group and the Hilden group, etc.   It might make more sense to define the concept of motion group and mention the loop braid group (and its synonyms) as a particular example that has no standard name. Rybu (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uninformative
Talk:Skinner's Brewery

message: I propose merging Skinners Brewery and Skinner's Brewery as they are clearly the same company. DuncanHill 11:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I'm considering taking this article to AFD as none of the references appear to meet WP:RS and I can't find any reliable sources that would mark this company as notable. Googling the subject I can find some blog posts and commercial sites and some press releases but nothing that appears to constitute a reliable source. As such this subject would appear to fail WP:N. Before I do take it to AFD though I wonder if anyone knows of any reliable sources that might rectify this? Cheers, Jim7 86.136.138.77 (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Considering AFD, thoughts?
Talk:Low-energy electron diffraction

message: Fixed.
The second link in the "botan" section is broken.
*  LEED Surface Structure Group at Stony Brook.
--HenrikMidtiby 18:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In section 3.2, why is the de Broglie wavelength referred to as the "de Broglie hypothesis"? Matter waves are a solidified concept in physics and have long been experimentally proven. "de Broglie hypothesis" is to the best of my knowledge not a common name either; '"Broglie wavelength"' returns 40k results on Google Scholar versus 1k for '"Broglie hypothesis"'.
2001:4CA0:0:F262:B0F1:22CF:B7D4:FEE4 (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  de Broglie hypothesis? 

message: It is only a small part, cross-citing to here and with a little more general comment as TED/SXRD/DFT can also be used. It could perhaps be expanded slightly there. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small part copied to [[Electron diffraction]]
Talk:Magnetic amplifier

message: "The mag amp is a "magnetic field" kind of amplifier and is of Class H type."
I recommend that this sentence simply be dropped.  It is just a semanticly circular definition.  As for class H; what are the classes?  No link is provided.  Nothing in the article describes the significance of class H.  The article would be improved if the sentence were simply dropped. Anorlunda (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drop the Class H sentence 

message: I have been writing, off and on, a page on the history of magnetic amplifiers, while being unaware of this page until a recent general search.  Would there be any benefit in merging the two articles together, or keeping them separate?  This one appears to deal more with the technology, while the article I've been working on deals more in the history of the subject.  Comments?  Erzahler 21:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged the "history" article here with some editing.  The history would have to be a lot larger before it would stand on its own as a separate article, I think. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Thanks.  I haven't had any time to work on the article at all, and historical data is not always easy to find. Erzahler (talk) 02:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or expansion? 

message: Saturation (magnetic) (of Wikipedia) should perhaps be referred to in the article? QUITTNER 76.64.51.75 (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Magnetic field viewing film

message: It can't "glow" - what energy would be being supplied to make it so?   I suspect that it changes colour - but 'glow' implies it's emitting light - which I very much doubt. SteveBaker 06:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree wholeheartedly, SteveBaker.  But then what do you call this?  I mean, is it possible that the magnetic field induces some kind of electroluminescence?  Maybe as the magnet approaches the film, the changing flux induces electric current, which gradually dissipates over time once the film stops moving?  Clearly energy must be conserved... but that doesn't necessarily mean it isn't glowing.  The true test of "glowing" would be to test the film in the dark, and see if it emits light.  Nimur 00:43, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that's just the excuse I need to go out and buy some! :-)  Of course if I do that and run a proper experiment, it'll be condemned as WP:NOR!  <sigh>  SteveBaker 15:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Um...  claiming that it's glowing is OR of the worst kind:  speculations based upon online photos!  Here's the manufacturers spec sheet:  http://www.magnerite.com/frm_tek.html--Wjbeaty 19:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK - so it definitely doesn't glow then - that's what I thought. SteveBaker 14:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Glow"

message: To which title?
*Magnetic field viewing film
*Magnet viewing film
*Magnetic viewing film
They all get some google hits. Any comments? Femto 13:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: merge request 

message: OK - I've completed the merge and created the two redirects as discussed above. SteveBaker 14:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge completed
Talk:Magnetic form factor

message: An equation would be helpful. Rintrah 04:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I will look into expansion for this page. SpiralSource (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work
Talk:Magnetic pressure

message: While the MHD example of magnetic pressure in a plasma is a good illustration of the concept of magnetic pressure, a wire loop is not as good an example given the fact that the wire is one dimensional.  The units of magnetic pressure are force per unit area (i.e. energy per unit volume). AA1ZX (talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnetic pressure on wire loop
Talk:UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

message: For anyone who posts the question here, no, I don't know how the Model Law which was adopted in 1985 came to be included in a piece of Australian legislation passed in 1974.  I can only assume that the Australian legislation was amended in or after 1985 to include the provisions of the Model Law. Legis 11:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't know, people!
Talk:Magnetic tension

message: This force has units of a pressure gradient, but it is not a pressure gradient.  I have changed the first sentence to reflect this.  Spacehippy (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Magnetic tension  No such user (talk) 13:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Magnetic tension force →  – The word force at the end of Magnetic tension force is unnecessary and its removal would result in a more concise title without sacrificing recognizably. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 20:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2021
Talk:Quantum speed limit theorems

message: What is the relation to Fermi's golden rule?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.161.2.241 (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

message: Isn't the limit articulated here just another version of the Bremermann's limit?  It's the same inequality with a factor of 2 and pi different. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 01:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think Bremermann's limit uses space instead of energy as the limiting function.  --Indolering (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other article that says almost the same thing
Talk:Mean radiant temperature

message: To determine mean radiant temperatutre - and being without a black body or a copper globe thermometer - what do I do?
208.251.175.82 (talk) 12:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

message: In the first sentence, the ability to absorb heat is not also emissivity; rather it is Absorptance. Mrd999 (talk) 13:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  emissivity vs absorptance 

message: The formulas to calculate mean radiant temperature are wrong, more precisely the previous list is wrong : temperature has to be in °C to use these formulas, not in K.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniellou (talk • contribs) 17:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  MRT calculation formula 

message: The first sentence states, "The mean radiant temperature (MRT) is defined as the uniform temperature of an imaginary enclosure in which the radiant heat transfer from the human body is equal to the radiant heat transfer in the actual non-uniform enclosure." Everything in the Universe has a radiant temperature, so I don't see why the human body enters into the definition. This looks like someone confused the term "body" with "human body," but I see this wording has been in this article for more than two years. Pooua (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MRT Is Not Just About The Human Body 

message: Is the globe evacuated? If not, what's in there? Either way it'd be helpful to say. Jojalozzo (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globe thermometer 

message: The second formula for a standard globe (emissivity 0.95 150mm) appears to be wrong. The parameters above explicitly state that D is supplied in mm. Simplifying 1.1E8/(0.95*150^0.4) should give something more like 1.56E7 as opposed to 2.5E8 (which is the number you get is using m as the unit). 2603:6010:3F0F:5E08:8883:BB89:528:4CA2 (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standard globe MRT formula
Talk:Mermin–Wagner theorem

message: In the Heisenberg model example, the infinite magnetization is only an artifact of using the linear approximation. Maliz 21:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ... one of the authors (Herbert Wagner) himself; he is in Munich at the LMU university.
You can also ask Patrick Bruno at the Max-Planck Institute at Halle, Germany. The present article seems rather good.
-- 132.199.38.104 12:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For an expert on the Mermin-Wagner theorem please ask ... 

message: The reference by Halperin gives a history of the Mermin-Wagner theorem and points out that Hohenberg in fact submitted his paper first, and further that Mermin and Wagner not only were aware of the work, but said they were inspired by his work.    Unfortunately, due to the slow referee process the Mermin-Wagner paper was published first.  However, the community should probably agree that calling it "Mermin-Wagner" is not appropriate and it shoudl be called "Hohenberg-Mermin-Wagner" theorem.  I think we should change the title of this page correspondingly.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.246.246 (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider changing the title 

message: I don't understand the statement in the "Kosterlitz-Thouless transition" section that there can be an ordered phase without spontaneous symmetry breaking. Does this refer to a trivial (e.g. s = 0) ordered phase (which is not admissible for any systems where the spin has fixed magnitude)? How can there be an ordered phase which isn't killed by fluctuations? Woodford 07:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was at best a poor wording of the situation.  The XY model at low (nozero) temperature has quasi-long-range order (rational decay of correlations, so infinite range correlations in a certain sense) but this isn't an ordered phase as would generally be understood, trivial or otherwise.  Rafaelgr (talk) 22:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I tried to reformulate and extend this section. Hope that illuminates the nature of the transition.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cm.albrecht (talk • contribs) 12:39, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kosterlitz-Thouless transition 

message: This has been said before, Hohenberg came up with the theorem. Mermin and Wagner have often said this even in their paper. Sadly, Hohenberg got it published a year later. In Mermin's works he has always insisted that this should be called Hohenberg–Mermin–Wagner theorem, and maybe this article should be changed to reflect that. ReyHahn (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Microplasticity

message: I disagree with te definition of microplasticity, I think it also has another meaning.  The difference between macro- and micro- plasticity I was taught was not that they act on large and small areas, but that they are different ways of looking at the plasticity of a bulk material.  The macroplasticity ignores what is going on inside the material at the atomic scale and calculates what is happening at the continuum level by making approximations such as yield criteria etc.  Microplasticity, on the other hand, looks at the material from the atomic scale, examining the motion of dislocations, and thus scales it up to predict the bulk behaviour.  What does everybody else think? Mike 12:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center

message: Question if we build a multi platform reacter system in space that use the cold of space to cool the reactor core instead of water system cutting waste then use a beam transfer system to send the energy to earth in a clean form and also building the platform large enough to expand our space projects and maybe evan our mining local astrouds and maybe evan using the platform to reach the moon and set up a station for agracuture and other research.
:Well, my (very limited and introductory) understand of these things is that it's the cooling that generates the energy - cool water is pumped in and gets heated up by the fusion, the heated steam then spins some alternators to generate electricity. S. Morrow 18:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gizab District

message: On 8 June 2006 the United Nations quoted Gizab District as still being in Daykundi Province.
:http://193.194.138.190/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/5D75CF314F0C8AA7C1257187002F10CD?opendocument Skinsmoke 11:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Daykundi or Uruzgan Province?

message: Reminder to add  to this article when I get around to it, unless somebody else rewrites this first. --Danre98(talk^contribs) 04:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to self
Talk:McDonnell Douglas X-36

message: I agree with the unnamed poster above... the image is CGI and should either be replaced, removed, or accurately titled. - SidewinderX (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe CGI but NASA labels it a photo at NASA/DFRC X-36 image. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hmm, maybe I'm wrong... it looks pretty fake to me, but it could just be award lighting... Here's another photo I found on commons, not in flight, but a better photo IMO... -SidewinderX (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Veljko Kadijević

message: The references on this page are very very old.
This needs to be cleaned up.
-Zlatko
: Well, clean it up :-) --Dijxtra 18:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References and cleanup
Talk:Inferior extensor retinaculum of foot

message: Hello. 
I am a member of WikiProject Anatomy, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of anatomy. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct templates on this talk page for verification. Upon review of this article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown:
*Assess articles with class and importance factors
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:ANATOMY|WikiProject Anatomy]]

message: Why is this a cruciate ligament if it does not cross (make an X)? --Una Smith (talk) 05:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruciate X not Y