lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tokyu Corporation

message: Tokyu Corporation currently redirects here, but I wonder if it should be redirected to Tokyu Group instead.  I noticed it, because of the link from Mago Island (which was just added to this article a few minutes ago).  It seems more likely that it was the group which owned the island, and not the railway company.  Neier 00:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support - Because "Tokyu Corporation" is clearly the name used by the company itself. (I think "Tokyo Kyuko Electric Railway" was either the original English name used or is just a direct translation of the Japanese name.) DAJF 13:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :I've resurrected the Tokyu disambiguation page to satisfy our... disambiguation needs, unless we later decide we want the disambig page in another location. Seems like I previously replaced the disambig page with a redirect, but retrospectively I'd say whether the railway company or the group is "primary article" is debateable / ambiguous. —Tokek 04:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page resurrected 

message: I thought the correct name for the company in Japanese was Tokyu Dentetsu kabushiki gaisha as opposed to Tokyo Kyuko.  But as my edit was reverted , I may be wrong.  The official website seems to refer to the company as Tokyu in both Japanese and English.   Does anyone know which is the correct name for the company in Japanese.  Thanks. Tbo 157talk 23:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Sorry, it was me that reverted your edit. The full Japanese name is Tokyo Kyuko Dentetsu Kabushikigaisha, as shown on the Tokyu website, but, according to the Japanese Wiki article, Tokyu Dentetsu is also used as an official abbreviated version in publicity etc, as well as just Tokyu. Prior to 2006, Tokyo Kyuko was the official abbreviated form. I hope this clears up the confusion. --DAJF 23:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the helpful reply.  It makes sense now. Tbo 157talk 11:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the correct name of the company in Japanese? 
Talk:0 Series Shinkansen

message: http://documents.epfl.ch/users/a/al/allenbac/www/documents/Fich0203.pdf
Fan Railer (talk) 01:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Data on the 0 Series 

message: The WP article is obnoxiously silent on the origins of the 0-series tech. Allegedly, the 0-series was designed by Siemens, continuing the WW2 tradition of german -> japanese technology transfer. 91.82.35.73 (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is rather the other way round. German Railways (Deutsche Bundesbahn) has borrowed heavily from both the Shinkansen bullet train and the French TGV when designing the first generation ICE train in the 1980ies. This is not to belittle the close contacts which exist between the German railways and the Japanese.  --L.Willms (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herr Bullet Train. 

message: Re 0 Series Shinkansen#History ..."were standard gauge (  between the rails) → are  between the rails)" This is an instance where the incorporation of "disp=sqbr" into the template(s) would have been useful. Peter Horn User talk 16:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The use of "disp=sqbr"
Talk:Schism (DVD)

message: The DVD menus and the third chapter contain altered and slowed down versions of tracks from the Quake Soundtrack by Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails.
Do you have any evidence supporting this claim? --User:SeanQuixote | talk | my contribs 02:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit by Xenoploid
Talk:Ego psychology

message: ***Pasted discussion from former location in the Ego, Id & Super-ego article***
Combination of id, ego, superego and ego psychology articles
I am not sure this was a very good idea. Atlhough ego psychology is a school of psychoanalysis that originated in Freud's id-ego-superego model, I think it is confusing to have the ego psychology article stuffed into the id, ego, superego article. Ego psychology is a school of thought, and the id-ego-superego is a specific model.
I agree fully with this. The "ego, superego and id" could be discussed in an article called Structural theory of psychoanalysis. Ego psychology should be its own article. /skagedal... 01:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added a subsection under the Critiques of Ego-psychology as Lacan was a huge critic of this movement and his theory stood in opposition to it. His prominence in psychoanalysis and other fields of academia warrants a small mention at least. Jordangordanier 03:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacan 

message: Oscar Pfister, mentioned in 1.1, seems to be Swiss not Swedish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DC:673B:1100:4D8D:4007:CE3E:6624 (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscar Pfister 

message: He didn't really state or imply that a child needs to complete an 'oral stage' [and engage in an 'anal stage'] to be subsequently 'physically active', did he? 122.151.210.84 (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Kandaen

message: Is the trivia section really relevant? I really don't see the connection between "Can it?" in swedish and an insane alien supersoldier named Kanden. Dr. Lobotomy 02:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:509th Bomb Wing

message: I will add more but I am new at this and am out of time today. Sorry for the inconvinience. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lklk (talk • contribs).
The material is public domain, originating in the Air Force Historical Studies Office, but it still needs to be paragraphed, re-written into workable prose, and wikified. I strongly suggest doing that before adding more material.--Buckboard 07:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Danú

message: I've just updated this website, removing a lot of the old dead links, or the internal links that were going nowere. I also tried to lay out the info a bit better. I also mentioned some of the former players who used to be in the group.
Too many (rather optimistic) red links in my opinion. Ogg 11:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unless this singer is notable for anything other than being an ex singer with Danú. JASpencer (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in Ciarán Ó Gealbháin 

message: The spelling "Éamonn Doorley" occurs on the "Rolling Stone" website, and on a BBC page, but the spelling "Éamon Doorley" occurs on Danu's website and of Julie Fowlis's website, so that seems more likely. Ogg (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the Danu website has the spelling with two n's, but the spelling with one n appears on the cover of the Dual album, so I went with it.  Frumpet (talk) 23:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I have removed the obvious peacock language, leaving what seems to me to be publicly verifiable; and therefore I have also removed the npov tag.  Anyone who thinks the clean-up is inadequate can obviously restore it.
Paul Magnussen (talk) 17:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I can find no trace of this album on the 'Net; nor is it evident how the band can have produced one in 1995 when (it says here) they were formed in 1996.
Can anyone enlighten me?
Paul Magnussen (talk) 19:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It says on the band's website that they met in 1994, and started performing together in 1995. So that part of it is solved at least. WikiLoverr (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystic Dreams 
Talk:Apport (paranormal)

message: The lead describes the word as the action of transferring the object while several of the sources speak of the word as referring to the transported object itself. This kind of ambiguity is not all that unusual, but the lead should probably mention both usages.  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like it should be "apportation" (like "teleportation" is "to teleport something", this is "to apport something")  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.67.24 (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've seen dictionary definitions that explain apport (in the context of spiritualist medium beliefs) as the action of bringing the thing, and also the thing produced. So it would not be unreasonable to make this clear in the lead. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Another thing that seems unclear to me: Is apportation meant to be the action of transfering existing object or is it meant to be materialisation of previously non existing object? It is confusing because you speak of "the thing produced" while in case of it being concerned with transference it should rather be "the thing transfered" If i understand it corectly, apportation is meant to be synonymous with teleportation in parapsychological context. Now accroding to wikipedia, teleportation is simply the hypothetical transfer of matter or energy from one point to another without traversing the physical space between them. Yet in science fiction the teleportation is often conceptualized as meaning indirect transeference consisting in destroying the object in one place and transfering its information to traget place where the object is reproduced from different material. Now I could understand how one can get to the ambiguity of aportation by being inspired by various ideas of teleportation. But since claims about aportation usually lacks such sci-fi aspirations i would suppose that claims about the transfered thng being "produced" or "reproduced" would be less often even tho i could still understand wh they could get used to describe the appereance of thing in one place seemingly out of nowhere. I mean I could still understand that the witness culd for example describe the apportation as sudden materialisation of the object. But I suppose the apportation is meant to aply only to cases where there is some claim for the thing previously existing in some other place, be it place in our universe or anywhere else. 37.48.16.242 (talk) 11:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "To produce" also has the meaning of "to bring forward", not only "to create". --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

text: I’ve just put up an interesting comment on this topic. Would you care to share your thoughts upon my comment?  Carl.chaldecott (talk) 00:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What?… what, what? 2A02:C7C:D554:2C00:7DE2:7B4A:D312:3D61 (talk) 12:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb and noun?
Talk:Hy-Vee

message: The gas discount actually varies.  I've seen it for as little as 3 cents, and as much as 12 cents per gallon.
JesseG 02:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gas discount

message: In the paragraph "As of April 2006, Hy-Vee operates 198 supermarkets and 26 Drugstores in seven states. The company has new locations under construction. Over 100 of those stores are located in..." what does the "over 100 of these stores" refer to? The 198 supermarkets they currently operate? Or the "new locations" under construction? --Captadam 16:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The supermarkets they currently operate. --Iowahwyman 16:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear

message: Hy-Vee Food Stores → Hy-Vee – The company name is not Hy-Vee Food Stores, but rather Hy-Vee, per . Hy-Vee currently redirects to Hy-Vee Food Stores. Iowahwyman 16:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Being that I am not from the area, can someone in the know answer this:  Is Hy-Vee supposed to be a reference to the high five? 130.22.190.5 21:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General question about the name

message: My grandparents heard a rumor Hy-Vee may be exiting the Illinois market completely. Is there anything about this? I googled this and didn't find anything about this. Doing this would be really weird as with the expansion into Indiana and Kentucky means all the states that border Illinous except Michigan as of now would have Hy-Vee's except for Illinois.
The person who told my grandparents this rumor, IDK where he heard it from. Any clarification on this greatly appreciated! Moline1 (talk) 02:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hy-Vee leaving Illinois?
Talk:Adrian C. Wilcox High School

message: The conversion of Peters was direct, but Buchser's conversion is more complex to describe here--that Buchser became Santa Clara High School and the old Santa Clara High School campus (downtown) became Buchser Middle School.  Its still awkward, I didn't put all that detail into the prose.  Perhaps someone will find a way to put in the detail without being so wordy. Trackinfo (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle schools 

message: According to this article's version history, Fantastics either started in 1995 or 1997. I have been unable to find a reliable source verifying either date, so if anyone has information regarding the tradition, please respond here. In the meantime, I rephrased the section to say that Fantastics started in the 1990s and tagged it with . I will remove the part with Fantastics' start date if no reliable source can be found within a couple weeks. Update: I've removed the unsourced information. The rest of the section is still there, and I'd greatly appreciate it if someone finds a reliable source for Fantastics' start date. Thanks! The Sands of Time 0 (talk) 20:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was Fantastics first held?
Talk:Unanimity

message: Does unanimous explicitly mean "100%" support? Are there circumstances where a supermajority is considered unanimous? 68.50.82.21 (talk) 20:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does unanimous mean in terms of percentage?
Talk:The Charter

message: Is the Sol Sanctuim reference really relevant to this article? I don't think it is, and will check if there's an article on Sol Sanctuim into which I can merge the reference. Please comment or otherwise muse on my revelation - I won't change anything immediately. Nihiltres 03:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind; my Google check turned a pathetic 74 results, of which several were forum results and this article being in the top ten, and there's no Wikipedia article. It fails a notability test, and I will therefore now delete it. Nihiltres 03:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sol Sanctuim 

message: Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge this article into another one. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Green–white–checker finish

message: How did I do for a first article? Budcrew08 03:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Regarding the "notable exception to the rule" -- The article stakes that "If there is an incident during the final lap behind the leaders, and the run to the finish line is clear for the leaders, NASCAR may delay the caution until the checkered flag is shown, allowing the leaders to race for the win."
Is that the "official rule" or, in the case of the 2007 Daytona 500 example stated, is it decided in the heat of the moment.  I believe that at Dayton they delayed throwing the caution until the checker was thrown.
Does anyone else how some thoughts on this?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodeointhegreatwhitenorth (talk • contribs) 17:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caution after the white flag has been shown (re: noteable exception) 

message: Rather than throwing a caution and freezing the field at that point, NASCAR's 59 year old brain let the race continue, allowing Kevin Harvick to pass Martin before he crossed the finish line and take the win.
NASCAR announced during the race that it would end at Lap 225 then due to wrecks it would then end at lap 210 of 267 originally scheduled laps.
These examples aren't written in a style that would be appropriate for a unknowledged reader. added buzzword tag, suggest re-write. BT14 (talk) 22:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buzzwords 

message: The "past races" section was removed for the time being and archived here until it can be cleanly re-written. It served as not much more than miscellaneous "trivia" which is to avoided. I suggest a list of all of the previous GWC races in Cup. Which will not be difficult to research. Doctorindy (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section

message: It seems like the official name now is "Overtime" and not "Green-White-Checker", since it is now possible for the race to end without seeing the white flag, because if a caution comes out after the leader passes the "Overtime Line" but before the white flag comes out then the race is officially over once the leader crosses the start-finish line (there is no white flag lap).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4A:403:3F70:1987:35CB:2B63:A23E (talk) 22:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overtime instead of Green-White-Checker 
Talk:Expedition 12

message: I think the picture of the solar ecpise looks a little awkward just sitting there.   Chuck 03:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe moving to the left side, so it doesn't clash with the infobox  Chuck 08:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, I hope this works out. I put a link to the picture under a See Also Heading. I think this looks the best, and is the most appropriate. Chuck 08:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's not worth having just a link to a picture.. either have the image in the article, or don't bother mentioning it. the reason i changed it is because it looks like a mistake, to be honest.. and the reason it looks awkward over on the right like that (probably where it should be) is because of the actual problem with the article: there's not enough text! Mlm42 09:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, not enough text. I don't think the solar eclipse though, is what the Expedition 12 mission was about. In fact, it's not at all. It probably should be just a link, or not be there...although having a link is nice.  However, I am open to other opinions about it. Although I definately don't think it's any good on the right side...at least not until the article is filled in more. Chuck 09:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Good stuff.  Chuck 17:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Para Para

message: c  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.115.234 (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: What happened to all the information here? It seems a lot of text has been deleted.
Also the origin of parapara. As far as I know, there is no actual record of how it began, just speculation...
76.103.222.15 (talk) 08:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?? 

message: Would Miley Cyrus' "Hoedown Throwdown" count as Para Para outside of Japan? Just wondering... 98.217.132.179 (talk) 01:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoedown Throwdown? 

message: The origin needs more documentation.  It seems odd for men to have started it based upon Bon Odori.  I note that Michael Jackson's Thriller came out in 1983, but that has more full-body movement.  Maybe we have to wait for a musical historian to get interested and publish.  -- 70.57.157.46 (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Living in Japan in the early 90s, I had a few friends explain that para para dancing was inspired by the Take On Me music, with the name coming from onomatopoeia of the opening bar.  I'm surprised to see that is not even mentioned in the article as of today.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 21:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on origin needed 

message: I have found a Japanese television segement on para para that would be more useful here then on the gyaru article. I hope it is of use some how. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_8lL8CKalY 46.244.6.130 (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  OL's perspective on ''para para''. 

message: Just found this! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qzUGTNLP4o I hope both can be archived as they are quite long. 46.244.6.130 (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More useful videos
Talk:ComedySportz

message: Someone really has loused up the formatting of the page. Ugh, please fix it. Cernansky (talk) 02:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting of Page 

message: Hey, somebody ought to add descriptions of some of the games. It doesn't have to be as exhaustive as List of games from Whose Line Is It Anyway?, but it would be nice to show some of the flavor of the shows.
Freekee 03:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific games 

message: The World Championship used to be the National Tournament, but the tournament is never discussed, causing confusion later. The section which describes the World Championships says that the first was in 2004, which is correct, but then later the article says that the WC returns to Portland, which is incorrect, since Portland has only hosted the National Tournament. Suggest rewrite of that section to explain both. Cernansky 00:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing World Championship Information 

message: player (many of whom have other occupations such as secret CIA agents)
IS there a source for this info? GameOfAwesome (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Needed
Talk:Kakemono

message: The article currently has "Standing Scroll (立軸 tatejiku?)", with the comment "needs verification". As far as I can ascertain, 立軸 means a vertical or upright shaft in the context of machinery. I can find no references to it being used for scrolls.JimBreen (talk) 22:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of 立軸 (tatejiku)
File talk:Sabriel Book Cover.jpg

message: This image has in it some text under the cover which reads: "Read by Tim Curry". This suggests that the cover in question is that of an audiobook version. Is there a better cover image (of the book, rather than the audiobook) currently on Wikipedia? I'll look, please help if you can. Nihiltres 03:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is indeed the cover of the audio book, I will see what I can do to find another image. sonoftheclayr 09:47, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book cover?
Talk:Haddon Township, New Jersey

message: ...is also listed on the Haddonfield page as a Haddonfield resident. Anyone who cares enough about either HTown or Hfield or both (I don't care at all, heh) might want to touch base with an active contributor over there and come to some sort of consensus on where Stephen belongs. Jersey John (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spielberg 

message: Michael Tearson, pioneering FM radio DJ and longtime Westmont resident should be added to the list 173.72.71.235 (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people 

message: The Westmont Theater, pictured in “points of interest” is now a Planet Fitness. 173.72.71.235 (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction