Talk:Intrinsic value (finance)

message: Proposal to merge this article with Intrinsic theory of value
*I disagree with the proposal to merge these pages. 
*I also diagree with merging the pages.
*i dissagree also, the two explanations apply to different theories
*I also strongly disagree.  These are very different theories/concepts.  I work in finance (in derivative products more specifically) and have a bachelor degree in Economics.  I am very confident to say that the pages should not be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.183.193 (talk) 00:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from previous merge proposal with [[Intrinsic theory of value]]

message: hello, when i read this page, I am confused about the option part of it.  Specifically speaking the element when it states "floored to 0"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cam.dixon (talk • contribs) 01:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Option part

message: Shouldn't intrinsic value be defined in terms of present value, or some other measure of the time value of money, on this page? There certainly might be a relationship to the Intrinsic theory of value, as the merger proposal suggested, but I don't think all financial market participants who use the term 'intrinsic value' or 'fundamental value' would agree that it's the same thing. --Rinconsoleao (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: Fundamental value is usually defined in terms of expected present discounted value of payoffs. So if "intrinsic value" is the same as "fundamental value", then the discussion of the intrinsic value of options is wrong. Even when the value is "out of the money", it will usually have a positive probability of going "in the money" at some time in the future, and therefore its expected present discounted value is positive.
Also, Economic bubble is defined in terms of a deviation from intrinsic value. But an economic bubble is usually defined in terms of deviation from expected present discounted value. So if intrinsic value is not the same thing as expected present discounted value, then the definition of Economic bubble is wrong. --Rinconsoleao (talk) 11:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fundamental value of an option 

message: I would be interested in hearing opinions of Wikipedia users about usefulness of adding this external link to the article: iStoskResearch
iStoskResearch provides intrinsic (or fair) value calculations for most actively-traded US and Canadian stocks. Personally, I find it very useful. The model is also highly praised by Value Investing For Dummies and by High-Powered Investing All-In-One For Dummies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.122.208.187 (talk • contribs) 
:It shouldn't be there per WP:ELNO points 2, 4, 5, and 11. - MrOllie (talk) 13:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding external link  

message: Is this part of one particular sentence "...cash flows which are foregone by buying a piece of real estate..." incorrect. Should it read "cash flows which are foregone by selling a piece of real estate"?
173.153.7.137 (talk) 12:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misstatement in Real estate section