Talk:Directorate of Military Intelligence (United Kingdom)

message: When exactly were MI5 and MI6 placed under the Home Office and the Foreign Office? Opera hat 10:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MI5 and MI6 

message: MI13 may well still be classified, or it may not exist due to plain and simple superstition... i believe that the latter proposition is more likely. 
Regardless, the source which suggests the existence of MI20-25 on the guardian web page is just some loon who refers to himself as "Captain S.S DG of MI section 25". I mean seriously?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.62.93 (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be some reference to the missing 13...--Jack Upland (talk) 10:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad sources and contentious facts 

message: This article needs to explain what MI6 was originally. Sure, it's the foreign intelligence service now, but surely that wasn't the 6th section they formed?!  If other sections spied in Russia etc, what was Section 6's original brief?  The current article on MI6 says spying in Russia was its forte in WW1, so how does this make sense?--Jack Upland (talk) 11:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MI6? 

message: The main source of information here seems to be the security establisment, who have no motive to tell the truth and who denied the existence of MI5 and 6 until the end of the Cold War (despite the exposes of Philby etc).  Are there any other sources and if not can we put a caveat on the whole thing???--Jack Upland (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.174.102 (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In a world of smoke and mirrors, I don't suppose that any other sources will be available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:5B9A:E01:387F:5803:8D0E:76B4 (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disinformation 

message: The article MI15 has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails WP:V and WP:N
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[MI15]]

message: The article MI16 has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails WP:V and WP:N
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 18:05, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[MI16]]

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Directorate of Military Intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304112744/http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201860-.pdf to http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Army%20Commands%201860-.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Directorate of Military Intelligence (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080826032948/http://www.sis.gov.uk/output/Page471.html to http://www.sis.gov.uk/output/Page471.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Sections > Name > MI10 > Current Status > “Merged into MI16 after World War II” 
Is this a typo? Should this say “Merged into [MI6]after[…]” or is the MI16 designation correct? I am unsure, hence the question here, not an instant correction. 
Thanks to anyone skilled enough to let me know whats correct.
sincerely
praefectus PraefectusIX (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo or Correct Info?