Template talk:Infobox Italian comune

message: Can anyone please change Dialing code to Dialing code? I have done it in the sandbox. 90.235.39.58 (talk) 23:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Template-protected edit request on 30 April 2021

message: The four provinces in the region of Friuli Venezia Giulia were abolished over 2017 (Province of Pordenone, Province of Gorizia and Province of Trieste) and 2018 (Province of Udine). The Infobox Italian comune insists on having a |province= or |metropolitan_city= in order to show a map in the infobox, rather than showing "Lua error in Module:Location_map at line 522: Unable to find the specified location map definition: "Module:Location map/data/Italy Friuli Venezia Giulia" does not exist." Update to this infobox is needed. I would if I could. Help! Jmg38 (talk) 07:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, to whoever fixed the infobox to accept the region of Friuli Venezia Giulia without a (non-existent) province nor (non-existent) metropolitan city. While the article says that a Friuli Venezia Giulia statute allows for the potential upgrading of the region's capital, Trieste, to a metropolitan city, that is an issue for the Trieste article on some future (if ever) day. Jmg38 (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template fails for Friuli Venezia Giulia 

message: The following fields all contain data linked from Wikidata, including references:
*area_footnotes
*area_total_km2
*population_total
*population_footnotes
*population_as_of 
It is my understanding from reading the source that this data should not display if the parameter is already filled, however this does not seem to happen in the cases of "area_footnotes" and "population_footnotes". The references from both of these still appear in the reference list even when other references have been supplied as is the case, for example, at Baselice. Please could you fix this so that unnecessary references are not displayed.
Thank you! Vesuvio14 (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: – to , the Wikidata calls have been temporarily removed until more tests are run. Good catch, and thank you for your patience! P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 10:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Thank you so much! Vesuvio14 (talk) 11:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: my pleasure!  letting you know of this revert and the need for further tests. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 11:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

text:  the ,  and  params have been reinstated, because they appear to be working correctly. I'm unable to determine why the footnote params are malfunctioning. An anomaly in the  module perhaps? P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 01:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

text:  with  to the sandbox, an if function replaced the if empty template in the footnote params. That appears to do what we want it to do for the footnotes. That can go live now unless anyone thinks there is a better way. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 02:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Is live. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 19:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 15 February 2022 

message: The WD calls have been reintroduced to the sandbox, and the Baselice ibox has been included as a test case. The problems described above, while they do not seem to be visible in the test case (which is curious), they can be duplicated by previewing the sandbox on the Baselice page. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 10:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you so much! Vesuvio14 (talk) 11:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: my pleasure!  letting you know of this revert and the need for further tests. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 11:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

text:  the ,  and  params have been reinstated, because they appear to be working correctly. I'm unable to determine why the footnote params are malfunctioning. An anomaly in the  module perhaps? P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 01:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

text:  with  to the sandbox, an if function replaced the if empty template in the footnote params. That appears to do what we want it to do for the footnotes. That can go live now unless anyone thinks there is a better way. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 02:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Is live. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 19:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: The parameter short_description was removed upstream  (in , see  and I believe ), but this template still uses it. --ZandDev (msg) 01:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still getting this issue as of December 14th. It puts the page in :Category:Pages using infobox settlement with unknown parameters, even when that page isn't using short_description (see, for example, Deruta). Anyone figured out what's going on? HeyElliott (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template uses a non-existent parameter