lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Si monvmentvm reqvires, circvmspice

message: Hey does anyone know what "Si Monumentum Requires, Circumspice" means? Zouavman Le Zouave (Talk to me! • O)))) 11:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was requiris, you would be right, but requires is future tense (that could be interesting for those who care about the band’s lyrics in Latin). --217/83 00:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Why is the title of the article different from the title of the album?--Wehwalt (talk) 20:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the correct title, look at the album. --217/83 00:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Behold, misplaced arrogance on the internet! Look up Christopher Wren's resting place. The 'V' is a common substitution, but it is obvious that the this record is titled after Wren's epitaph, which is rendered with 'U's. The V's on the album cover are a stylistic decision. Why not go through the other album titles and change the U's to V's? U is the proper rendering. 91.125.169.34 (talk) 09:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Stylistic decision or not – it's the name of the album (and track); see cover and tracklist. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Steppe wolf

message: If it lives near the Caspian Sea, why is it named cubanensis? – Alensha talk 11:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know. But it needs an image, huh?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaos Machina (talk • contribs) 18:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Kuban is main river of North Caucasus, species former area was from Black to Caspian see. Kuban river is on a half way --Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, cubanensis definitely refers to river Kuban. Szabi (talk) 11:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

text: And one more possible: Exists tradition to use in latin nomeclature locality (region) ancient names. Daghestan and North Caspian coast of Azerbaijan medieval name was Kuba khanate (it is town in North Azerbaijan with this name). So no relation to Cuba and Castro. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative name "cubanensis" 

message: "pri-Ural" and "pri-Caspian" seem to be partial translations from Russian (as in приуральский район, etc.). The prefix "pri-" is meaningless in English. Should be corrected. Szabi (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  pri-? 

message: The text says that C. l. campestris happens "occasionally" in the steppes of Romania, while the map shows it happening in the mountains of Romania, not in the steppes. The text for C. l. lupus says that Romania has a large population, which happens mostly in the mountains. Someone should change the maps.
69.113.220.62 (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-species map confusion
File talk:Well of Loneliness - Cape 1928.jpg

message: The cover of a book published in 1928?  Surely this is out of copyright (at least in the UK) by now?
The book itself will be out of copyright on 7 October 2013 (70 years after the death of Radclyffe Hall). -- ALoan (Talk) 12:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it depend on the date of death of the book designer?  (Although this may barely qualify as a design.) —Celithemis 01:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If the designer is unknown, it is 70 years, surely? -- ALoan (Talk) 11:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The designer's unknown to me; I don't know about unknown unknown. —Celithemis 01:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:James Miller (architect)

message: Stub article set up to avoid disambiguation elsewhere.
--NSH001 12:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit optimistic? Its currently somewhere between stub-class and start-class. Adding pictures will make it a stub/start class article with pictures. Hardly GA class. It might make B class with more text; and I'll work on expanding it from a Glasgow / railway perspective.Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's obviously little more than a stub at the moment. However the necessary sources are all there, referenced in the article - all it needs is someone to spend a few hours paraphrasing/summarising/organising them, add a few photos, maybe someone else to do some copyediting, and then it WILL be quite close to GA status. I've been waiting over a year for someone to do this, (I had in mind someone interested in architecture, which is not a subject of interest to me). Thanks for having a go, I appreciate it. NSH001 (talk) 17:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm currently working on this article; I've added some text but I still need to make links, citations etc. Hope to do this in the next few days, so please be patient! DavidBBG (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent! No rush, it's much better for content to be accurate, even if it takes a little more time. Try to use the best sources, namely books published by reputable university presses and peer-reviewed journals. A photo of Miller himself for the infobox would be good, if you can find one (I tried to, some time ago, and failed). --NSH001 (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion
Talk:Gatineau River

message: It's wrong. Any Québécois would say it "ga-tsi-no".
70.30.100.138 (talk) 02:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Kagura

message: I removed a picture with the caption "kagura stage" because it very clearly depicted the bugaku dance called "Enbu". While bugaku and kagura might share similarities, there is no place for this picture in this article.Geertrinkel (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed picture "kagura stage"

message: Shouldn't "daikagura" actually be "okagura"? I've seen several Japanese sources saying it's pronounced おおかぐら. Paul Davidson (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Daikagura?

message: I realized half-way through writing this that there is actually a sizeable section on kagura in the article on Shinto. If anyone would like to try to reconcile these two, maybe take elements from the Shinto article into this one, or even just delete this one entirely and make it a link to Shinto, I'd appreciate it. Sorry for the messup. LordAmeth 12:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge elements?

message: The translation at the top of the article says "oracular divinaification". I'm guessing this should say "oracular divinification", because the only places I can find "divinaification" on Google seem to be sourced from this article.
But I'm not certain, so I'm just posting it here for now.
Claudia (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  divinification?
Template talk:Aqua Teen Hunger Force

message: I removed the character list from this template. All the character pages redirect to the main article now, so I don't see any point in having the character list in this template any longer... Kamek (talk) 01:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list 

message: Navigational template's should only include full articles. Redirects, sections and redlinks shouldn't be there. It being "Valid information. No reason to remove." is sems like POV on your part.★Trekker (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, when I was nice enough to start a conversation and ping someone I was kind of expecting a response.★Trekker (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, in most cases redirects and section links should be avoided. But in cretin cases it can be justified. The fact that the title of the show changed repeatedly is a major aspect of the shows history and shouldn't be glossed over in a Navbox devoted to the show. Grapesoda22 (✉) 00:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: But a navbox exists to link extant articles not necessarily tell the reader much about them.★Trekker (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a major major major thing it really is worth mentioning. Grapesoda22 (✉) 00:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I don't get why but I won't push it anymore. I'm tired of navbox stuff.★Trekker (talk) 00:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This again
Talk:Duplicate Scrabble

message: If anyone speaks Dutch, read this. It could add to the article. Mglovesfun 12:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

message: It is unclear to me from the article if EVERYONE gets to keep their score from each turn or if only the player with the best score and thus the posted word keeps his score. 76.106.149.108 (talk) 02:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring question
Talk:ʻŌʻū

message: There's a contradiction within the article as to the last known location in which the bird was seen. The "Status" section notes that the bird was last seen on Kaua'i in 1989, but under "Protection," it notes that "The ʻōʻū was last seen in the ʻOlaʻa area of the Big Island." Which is it? Daniel Lewis, Ph.D. 08:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Palila

message: From the article:
:The palila was the first animal to have a 9th circuit federal case cited in its own name. Prior to Palila v. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources 852 F.2d 1106 (U.S. 1988), cases were cited under the represented party e.g. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 504 U.S. 555 (U.S. 1992), this citing error opened a door for environmental protection agencies who in prior years had lost on issue of standing, e.g. Lujan. As the Circuit Court Justices so aptly realized, the fact that this bird had “winged itself into court” represented a major stepping stone for animal rights activists.
Firstly, claiming that this is a citing error is questionable. It seems unlikely to me that the judges or lawyers involved would do this accidentally. According to The New York Times the judge explicitly ruled that the species had standing.
Secondly, claiming that this was some sort of victory for animal rights activists is highly questionable. This case was about a species, whereas animal rights activists believe that animals have individual rights. The distinction between a species and an individual is critical here and there's no evidence that I can see that this ruling granted or extended legal rights to any individual bird.
Unless some references can be found for these two controversial claims I will remove them from the article. Pburka (talk) 18:57, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal rights
Talk:History of Christian theology

message: As the archives demonstrate, frequent editors have pointed out the need for improvements to this article. I've already begun working on this by writing new Background, "First century" and "Second century" sections. These are my thoughts for further revision. At this time, I'm mainly focused on the early periods of Christianity. 
For the lede:
* There isn't a real lede (this was pointed out years ago and the situation remains the same). The article begins by abruptly talking about the Trinity.
For the section "Biblical Canon":
* I'm seeing primary sources (ancient Christian writers) used as sources
* Some good facts with good sources
For the section "Patristic theology":
*It's entirely unsourced. 
*The subsection "Ante-Nicene Fathers" is a list of writers that is not very informative. 
For the section "Nicene Creed":
*One unsourced paragraph that is confusing. What is the "argument" that was "closed" in the first sentence? 
* The subsection "Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers" is unsourced, uses pov language ("heretical Byzantine emperors), and is mainly just a list of the writers of the time.
* The subsection "Papacy and Primacy" has some sources but not sure about the overall accuracy. 
For the section "Early heresies":
* I don't like lumping the early "heresies" into one section. They should be threaded throughout the chronological narrative as they appear. Often, "orthodox" theology was developed or clarified in response to theological controversies, so both "heresy" and "orthodoxy" should be discussed alongside each other. 
* Section uses Scripture verses as sources
* Some of these sources look like they are devotional rather than scholarly but not sure. Need a closer look. 
With all this being said, my approach is to focus on developments up to 500 for now. I will probably divide things up by century, but preserve the section on the Biblical canon as I think it would be useful to keep that information altogether. As for the "Early heresies" section, I think it best to spread that information throughout the chronological narrative. Ltwin (talk) 04:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article could be promoted to B Class (and I would do that) except that it needs a more reasonable lede, if it not an ideal one. Countercheck (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Improvement
Talk:Heidelberger Bergbahn

message: It would be nice to have a photo of a lower section car, to contrast their modern looks with the upper section's heritage look. Anybody got/can get one?. -- Waterstones 13:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Needed 
Talk:Vrbas, Serbia

message: "German population fled from the town after this war." Is this true? Wikipedia articles about Odžaci, Apatin and Danube Swabian seem to be more realistic by saying  for Odžaci "the German majority (the highest percentage of any major town in the Vojvodina, ahead of Vrbas and Apatin), by then known as Danube Swabians, were labeled collectively guilty for their connection to the Axis invasion, and were expelled, interned, or killed." or for Apatin "The antifascist council for deliberation of Yugoslavia (AVNOJ) declared its mainly German population as public enemies. The death toll among the German population of Apatin amounts to 2,074 people known by name. This figure includes the victims of deportation to the USSR"  or Danube Swabian "After the war, many of the Germans of Yugoslavia, who by this point were mostly women, children, or elderly, were held in camps made out of their former towns, such as the ones at Knićanin and Molin"
Sorry I understand the ban is only connected to political issues, but now I understand that it also applies to all. So I'll stop now.--Nado158 (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: German population fled?
Talk:GNU Binutils

message: Should libbfd be described in this article or in GNU Debugger? Gronky 13:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Silly me, it has it's own article and was even already linked: libbfd Gronky 13:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libbfd 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support In addition to being the common name, it's also the one used in official documentation. We wouldn't expand Photoshop to "Photograph shop" for example, even if the meaning is implied. It's easy enough to provide this info in the lead. Ham Pastrami (talk) 07:01, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I see nothing in the article which supports this claim, yet it's stated that GNU Binutils was started by people working for Cygnus. I'm sure they have contributed but afaik, Stallman started the GNU project, (meaning he started the binutils project -- which is a pretty core piece of software in any operating system). Can someone confirm this claim?
FrederikHertzum (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim that Cygnus Solution employees started GNU Binutils may be a stretch
Talk:University of Antioquia

message: Upon request, I hit this. Comments:
* List the number of students and graduates at the university as a whole and at each canmpus.
* Describe any programs for financially supporting students.
* List notable faculty members and their accomplishments.
:Cheers. Lfstevens (talk) 19:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyedit 
Talk:CambridgeSeven

message: This page reads like an ad, which is a shame as these folks have done dome really impressive work (including designing my favorite subway station in Boston, Forest Hills). Someone more skilled than I should really re-write this page.
:Well I cut out the advertising, but it still needs some refs. I always liked Porter - it seems they did that too! Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added photo and some language about Cambridge Seven Associates culture. I don't think it sounds like an ad.  What do you think?  I also added lots of links to MBTA sites that C7A designed as people seemed interested in those. --Blue Olive (talk) 19:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

text: New to Wiki editing. Just realized I should be clear that I work for Cambridge Seven Associates. I am editing the pages of my own volition and not having been asked by the firm.--Blue Olive (talk) 18:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some work on the article, hopefully it's a start. —Alalch E. 23:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Lika an ad
Talk:Gerontocracy

message: English got a fine line between Elder and Elderly. Elders in the days of yore were apt people age 30 to 40.
A gerontocracy chooses elderly over elder. Examples are the Vatican or the USSR, installing leaders even if they already have proven terminally ill.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.83.108.100 (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elder and Elderly 

message: While Pelosi's image may have been previously been good as an example of American gerontocracy, I feel like the fact that she's no longer Speaker makes the picture outdated. How bout McConnel and/or Feinstein? NickCT (talk) 13:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change Pelosi pic?
Talk:Joseph Delaney

message: I support the merge of Wardstone Chronicles into this article. Fences&Windows 13:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support as well. Technically, there is no "Spook Series" as such; the series' official name is "The Wardstone Chronicles". Armuk (talk) 17:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Help and improve this article as much as possible.Bronson Naylor 22:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help improve 

message: IP editor  has made a number of edits that show unfamiliarity with Wikipedia and general quality issues.  He or she has been editing other editor's comments on talk pages, creating new talk pages for articles that do not exist, and introducing errors.  I've reverted a number of his/her edits in articles about Oz books, and moving to speedy the spurious talk page creations.  He or she has made a number of edits to this page and to the Spook series books.  I'm not familiar enough with them to revert those edits, but strongly recommend one of you who do to review them and revert as appropriate. TJRC (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted, thanks. --WikiHannibal (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  86.46.229.237 edits 

message: Is it necessary to have the same book lists on the author page and the Spook's series page? Throughthemind (talk) 12:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated book lists
Talk:List of least carbon efficient power stations

message: The WWF list clearly state it's only considering 30 countries so I renamed the title of that table appropriately. This of course also means we have a Europe list and a 30 industrialised countries list but no more inclusive list. However this isn't particularly surprising since it's likely figures are rather unclear or unpublished for some countries. In any case, the Kyoto protocol only applies to developed countries Nil Einne (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWF list 

message: The merger was proposed by Jklamo on 8th August 2010. I too support the merge from Dirty thirty (WWF) to this article. Rehman(+) 12:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: As explained at https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac13f1
OK?
Chidgk1 (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to create a new list with absolute emissions, but keep the current list with a current scope.--Jklamo (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: But don't you think the least carbon efficient are the small lignite plants for which Climate TRACE has no data? Where would the data for this list come from? Chidgk1 (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest list absolute emissions and rename 

message: Please could you explain why you are repeatedly deleting the sentence I wrote about the Balbina Dam Chidgk1 (talk) 14:53, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balbina Dam
Talk:Smart client

message: Is a smart client limited to a client that is run through a browser?  For example, if a client is a desktop application that meets the other requirements of a smart client (e.g., requires no installation, automatically updates without user action) could the application still be considered a "smart client"?
Senfo 13:29, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I see it, there's no such limitation. Applications which use either Java Web Start or .NET ClickOnce could also be called smart clients.--Mormat (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Category talk:Belgian comics

message: I think Rik Ringers is also a Belgian comic book. If someone can confirm this, please add it to the page. url --87.66.99.108 13:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the character is originally called Ric Hochet, by a Belgian and a Frenchman. And yes, we don't have an article on him yet.. Next time, maybe not best to bring such a thing up on a Catalogue talk page (since it's for specific catalogue issues, and many don't see this page), but a talk page closer to the subject, maybe like Talk:Franco-Belgian comics, Talk:List of comic books, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics.  MURGH disc. 14:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rik

message: What exactly do you imply by the category "Belgian comics"? Is it about cartoons or some wider or more narrow category? --Oddeivind 09:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cartoons?
Talk:Biosignature

message: Ben Pageler is not the author of reference 3; Carol Cleland is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben Pageler
198.11.27.90 (talk) 00:13, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ref author

message: I am a PhD student in astronomy and astrobiology and as part of my final project in my planetary atmospheres course, I was tasked with revamping this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcurr (talk • contribs) 18:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome. If you need help with anything, just ask here, or ask me on my talk page. When conversing on talk pages, sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) and your username and timestamp will be substituted. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:20, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamping page as part of grad course project 

message: In "Antibiosignatures" paragraph the statement "The evidence that nothing on an earth is taking advantage of the "free lunch" available due to an observed redox imbalance is called antibiosignatures" is unclear. Please clarify & rephrase. Thanks GOLDSROBI (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear statement
Talk:Rei Kurosawa

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support — This move is uncontroversial.--Endroit 17:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support — This move is uncontroversial.--Endroit 17:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move
Talk:NASCAR Hot Pass

message: Unfortunately, I missed the NASCAR Hot Pass listings for last Sunday's race.  If someone else was watching, would you provide the names of the drivers?  I will fill them into the spaces provided. - Desmond Hobson 21:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Martinsville drivers?

message: When Dale Earnhardt Jr. dropped out of the 2009 Auto Club 500 due to engine failure, his coverage was replaced with Bobby Labonte coverage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.234.32 (talk) 02:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacement