lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maleic anhydride

message: My first article/stub.  I'll check the Merck index and some other literature for additional information as soon as possible. Carbon warrior 18:36, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The pic of this compound is a little confusing, because the lines from the letters 'H','C', and 'O' look like they represent chemical bonds. I finally figured out that these lines are really just like arrows pointing out what the colors mean. Joeylawn 02:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture a little confusing 

message: With the number of uses of maleic anhydride in mind, I propose that we create a separate section for the uses of it. YogiReallyRoxx!! 11:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Uses?

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but even though the compound is has a cis double bond, I don't think that it's even physically possible to have a trans cycloalkene with less than a 7 membered ring because the amount of angle strain would be entirely too huge.  Moreover, the molecule could not exist as a dione with the double bond in any other position unless the oxygen in the ring had a +1 charge, and if it could (which it can't) to be truly correct we'd need to specify that it was (Z)-butenedioic anhydride (if that could exist). That said, because of the redundancy I've changed "cis-butenedioic anhydride" to "butenedioic anhydride," but if anyone disagrees with me feel free to revert my edit.Yamakiri TC</span>  05-2-2013 • 14:15:53 14:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature
Talk:José Núñez (right-handed pitcher)

message: --Maoririder 18:19, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cloverhill Bakery

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 00:06, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:Green Bay Gamblers

message: I realize that there are a lot of proud parents involved here, but wouldn't it be even more appealing to them if the article appeared to be fair and balanced?  I don't have time tonight to clean this up (Oh, Lord, it's 6:20 AM! I gotta get to sleep!) but it's my intention to come back and de-glurge this. Anyone wants to take a whack at it before I return, have at it.
ClairSamoht 11:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Way to Happiness

message: This article can’t make up its mind whether it concerns the book or the organization. Perhaps we should split it into one page about each. ―cobaltcigs 19:32, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 

message: The article starts with a neutral posture, then turns derogatory. It focuses on the connection between the book and Scientology.  It transparently seeks to discourage an unbiased reading by suggesting Scientology jams it down the throats of mayors, etc, and imprints it with mayor photos/names without authorization.  It fails to disclose or summarize content, which it could do within copyright constraints.  It thereby fails to encourage an unbiased reader to make a personal evaluation of the merit of its content.  It provides insufficient analysis of 
* the content as to merit,
* reaction of readers to the content,
* impact of reading it on the behavior of the reader, and 
* impact of reading it on the happiness of the reader.
I suggest reducing the negative verbiage about 
* how proponents promote and distribute it, 
* reaction of mayors to methods of promotion and distribution, 
* imprinting of samples with mayor's names and photos for promo value, and 
* the connection between Scientology and The Way To Happiness Foundation, particularly if the author of the article cannot show a connection of the precepts in the book to religious dogma.
I suggest increasing the neutral and unbiased verbiage such as
* examples of content (quote some phrases)
* summary of content (listing some or all of the 21 precepts)
* discussing broadly quantifiable good that has come from reading the book
* impressions as to merits of the book by the leaders of any schools, prisons, or other organizations in which participants/members have read the book,
* actual before-and-after crime or other behavior statistics in areas where people have read the book
* reactions of parents whose children have read the book, as to impact on child behavior — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flembok (talk • contribs) 16:50, 6 May 2012
:The connection between Scientology and The Way to Happiness is well documented in WP:RS.  While I do agree that we could summarize the contents a bit better you should probably take a look at WP:NPOV which states what Wikipedia's neutrality policy is.  In brief wikipedia asks that the content of an article reflects, in proportion, the views of the reliable sources available.  This means that if 80% of the reliable sources ties this book in with scientology, while 20% tie it in with the Way to Happiness foundation then we don't offer a 50/50 distribution within the article, rather an 80/20 distribution.Coffeepusher (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: actually based on the WP:RS a whole lot of people care about the connection as a PR stunt for Scientology.  Do you have any secondary sources which discuss "the functional result of reading the book, and the merit of distributing it" or were you simply proposing that we rely on primary sources?Coffeepusher (talk) 21:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Generally Derogatory and Uninformative
Talk:Microcassette

message: Here are two images I've put in the commons that could be used in this article.--Malcohol 18:27, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: There is clearly an error in the article, but I've got no idea the right figures to use.
"The original standard microcassette, the MC60, gives 30 minutes recording per side at its standard speed of 1.2 cm/s, and twice the time at 2.4 cm/s."
A cassette cannot record 30 minutes at 1.2 cm/s and 60 minutes at 2.4 cm/s.
It should either be half the recording time (15 minutes at 2.4 cm/s) or half the tape speed (60 minutes at 0.6 cm/s). I've got no idea how it should be, and the last time I used a MC player was years ago.
Anyone knows the right figures?
201.213.16.47 21:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording time error in the article

message: I am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:CS, WP:NOR, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncited material in need of citations
Talk:Kanchipuram

message: From 'Economy' - myths and legends don't belong in that section. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text
Talk:Acton School Department

message: --Maoririder 18:43, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I propose that this article be merged into the town's main site Acton, Maine.  For the purposes of the information included on this page, that would make the most sense.  -- Lucas20 (talk) 22:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Waynflete School

message: --Maoririder 18:52, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I originally used the translation google gave, but someone changed the translation without changing the reference source, so I removed the source since that is not the translation google gives (http://i43.tinypic.com/ncinn9.jpg).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheezesatzu (talk • contribs) 03:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto translation
Talk:Saud bin Faisal Al Saud

message: It has Arabic, but I think the script spells "Saud al-Faisal", not "Saud bin Faisal bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud" as it should. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 19:06, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
spelling corrected to سعود بن فيصل بن عبد العزيز السعود keeep them stars coming my way ;)  And a decoder ring too.
--The Brain 08:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says he speaks seven languages, and quotes a reference to a New York Times article.  But what that article actually says is: "Prince Saud has a degree in economics from Princeton, and his official profile says that he speaks seven languages."  That's not quite the same thing.  Has anyone a better reference?  Philip Trueman (talk) 02:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hearsay 

message: The links given before under External Links section are mostly dead, two of them are unrelated. So I put them below.Egeymi (talk) 17:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 
Talk:Timothy Greenfield-Sanders

message: While this subject does pass notability guidelines through his awards nominations, and provides a list of good additional references at the end of the article, the article itself does not cite appropriate resources on the whole. In order to better the article, the reference list at the end needs to be inserted in-line into the article. At this point, the sources used in the text itself are not reliable nor notable enough. Shouldn't be too hard to fix.
Jeremy112233 (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: References are good, but 16 for the introductory sentence, which is little longer than 16 words, is excessive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.99.185.183 (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Gaizkiñ

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: I guess this article reffers to the same criature that this other one (gaizkina) in the basque wiki or doesn't it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markus2801 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: They have already been unified. Markus2801 (talk) 02:29, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basque wiki Gaizkina
Talk:Ilazki

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt that there was a Basque moon goddess. Hilargi is the standard word for moon. The The etymology is uncertain, "Light of the dead" or "light of the month". --Error 01:24, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm insufficiently multilingual to judge this well, but may I offer http://www.buber.net/Basque/Astro/node9.html for consideration? Corgi 06:08, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning
Talk:Inguma

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is Basque and Iberian etymology the same? --Error 02:00, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

text: Not at all. Today, basques comes from 4 races: autrigons, varduls, carists and baskons. They're not the same. And, I can't find any relation between Inguma (or Mauma, as called in various basque regions) and the iberians in internet and/or publications. -- Joxean Koret  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.0.241.41 (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning
Talk:Maju

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: The stub is fine. It's contents are accurate but it should be merged with Sugaar article, as both are just diferent names for the same god (another names are Sugar and Sugoi). A redirect link should maybe added for all these entries.
*Merge --Phoenix Hacker 09:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Sugaar
Talk:Mari (Basque)

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been checking the article source and it is more or less ok. Better than Mari (Basque) article (but worse than my own Mari (godess) one). I mostly doubt what says of the sickle being her symbol (first time I read that) or the fussion with Santa Marina only (the most widely accepted synchretism is with Virgin Mary). --Sugaar 19:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: I would say absolutely YES. Obviously Mari (Basque) and Mari (Godess) are the same character: Mari, the Basque Godess. Anbotoko Mari is just a local variant of the same mythological character.
Yet the base article should be my own creation Mari (godess) as I can assure that it is pretty much accurate, while Mari (Basque) is a very poor article with many innacuracies.
--Sugaar 19:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Mari articles? 

message: The affirmation that Mari was godess of ancient Iberians is marely speculative. I have never read such thing. As far as we can say Mari is just a Basque divinity (the main one) and, while it may have been related to other pre-Roman pantheons, we simply don't know it. 
Lurbira, as mentioned by Error in that article talk page, is no divinity. Only Ama Lur, probably a modern creation, has some meaning there. For the sake of seriousness (both of Wikipedia and Basque Mythology knowledge), both articles Mari (Basque) and Lurbira should be deleted. --Sugaar 19:56, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innacuracies in the Mari (Basque) article 

message: Please look at Anbotoko Mari Judgesurreal777 00:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Urtzi

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ortzi, Urtzi is one of the Basque words for "sky". I am not sure it had a mythical pre-Christian meaning. --Error 23:21, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I doubt that the lauburu is a symbol of the sky. --Error 01:11, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: Why on earth does it say that "The medieval pilgrim Aymericus Picaudus notes that the Basque word for the Christian God is Urcia" is a disputed claim? Just read Chapter VII, Book V of Codex Calixtinus:
:"[...] Si illos comedere uideres, canibus edentibus uel porcis eos computares. Sique illos loqui audires, canum latrancium memorares. Barbara enim lingua penitus habentur. Deum uocant Urcia, Dei genitricem Andrea Maria, panem ogui, uinum ardum, carnem aragui, piscem araign, domum echea, dominum domus iaona, dominam andrea, ecclesiam elicera, presbiterum belaterra, quod interpretatur pulcra terra, tricticum gari, aquam uric, regem ereguia, sanctum Iacobum Iaona domne Iacue. [...]" 
Sure, French pilgrim Aymericus Picaudus wasn't precise objective when describing the Basques, but he did claim they called God Urcia, so the fact that he said that is not disputable. Uaxuctum 17:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant to mark as dubious the following text. Maybe Template:dubious changed since. Anyway, thanks for the reference. --Error 02:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've merged all the Urtzi relevant stuff onto the main page of the Basque mythology page under Basque_mythology#The_Urtzi_controversy. It's not a lot of material and sits quite well there and I thing we should mark the Urtzi page for deletion. Unless someone digs up a Roman library with a bio on Urtzi, we're unlikely to ever resolve the issue or find more evidence so it would always be a slightly sad stub. Would anyone object to that? Akerbeltz (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would delete just the Iberian part. The page can serve as an explanation of the name, linking to modern people named so. --Error (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We have pages about person names, like Aitor, Vanessa (name), Arantxa. In this case, it makes sense to have the meaning and the disambiguation in the same page. --Error (talk) 20:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

text: No one is trying to kill anything. It's common of course for a new religion to try and eradicate the old religion(s) somehow and Urtzi may or may not have been the victim of that. The problem is that we cannot say for certain, looking at the evidence, that he was or wasn't. Think of it as a crime scene with too little information to say if a murder has or has not been committed. That doesn't mean to detectives are trying to hide a murder, it just means they can't tell either way until someone finds more evidence. Akerbeltz (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed?
Talk:Erditse

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with that. The information from Encyclopedia mythica concerning Erditse, Bensozia (or Benzozia) and basque mythology in general is completely fanciful and bogus. By the way, Erditse and Bensozia don't even belong to the basque mythology. Erditse is only known by a votive altar found in Toulouse, France (CIL XII 5379), then lost. Bensozia was revered during the XIII century in the departement of Ariège (according to Du Cange then Carlo Ginzburg). -- Basilus (talk) 17:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning

message: Frankly, I would like to see a little more on Bensozia as a figure of myth; both Erditse & the section in Bensozia are pretty skimpy.  The only source I know of dealing with Bensozia in myth is Carlo Ginzburg's Ecstasies, but I think we could scrounge up at least a sections worth of meritous information.  --mordicai. 15:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This merge would be uncorrect. Erditse is a gallo-roman god, Bensozia a Middle Age goddess. There are no relations between them. -- Basilus (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Bensozia]] 

message: Erditse was not a goddess yet a god. Nothing is known concerning his functions. He was not revered in ancient Iberia nor by ancient Basques. Many altars haven't been found in northwestern Spain, yet just one altar in Toulouse, France. The Basques have never revered a mother-goddess known as Benzozia, whom name is not even basque yet has a latine etymology (bona socia, good neighbour). There are certainly no relations between Erditse and Bensozia. -- Basilus (talk) 18:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All is wrong
Talk:Eate

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, are Basque and Iberian mythologies the same? --Error 01:40, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning
Talk:Tom Tom Club

message: Does anybody know why the name Tom Tom Club? Infrasonik 04:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: Here is a short but interesting documentary about the Wordy Rappinghood. Maybe someone cares to make an article out of it? http://player.omroep.nl/?aflID=11980501 My English isn't good enough.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.176.234.128 (talk) 08:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wordy Rappinghood 

message: does anybody know why the Tom Tom Club's first album is not listed on the R&B charts...
the album went to number 2 on March 20, 1982 where it stayed for 3 weeks...
this is also not printed in the R&B albums from Joel Whitburn's
Top R&B albums 1965-1998.....
thx
Jim  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.213.133.145 (talk) 05:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  omitted from the charts 

message: I will leave this to someone else (or to me at a later date) to dig up encyclopedic sources and restructure the article— but I will say here that circa 1990, Frantz & Weymouth toured extensively as Tom Tom Club  along with former Talking Heads bandmate Jerry Harrison.  This version of Tom Tom Club performed a few of Harrison's solo songs along with the expected Tom Tom Club and Talking Heads numbers. Harrison had a new album out at the time, but Tom Tom Club's most recent album would have been a couple of years old by then.  Timothy Horrigan (talk) 23:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 Tour 
Talk:Aide (deity)

message: I see that the Encyclopedia mythica has been cited as a source. Several Scandinavians, User:Haukurth, User:Salleman, User:Io and myself have identified bogus information taken from that site on Norse mythology, and removed it from Wikipedia.--Wiglaf 19:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Aide seems very similar to Spanish aire or French aer. It seems dubious for a pre-Roman god. --Error 01:39, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Warning
Talk:Christopher Zeeman

message: This hagiography pays very little attention to how Zeeman over-hyped the importance of catastrophe theory in the popular media, with claims about descriptions of aggression in wolves, anorexia, and predictions of prison riots (predictions that turned out to be completely wrong). This over-cooking of the pudding led to the demise, rightly or wrongly, of catastrophe theory as a serious paradigm in science (a little thereafter it was overtaken by the next fads, fractals and chaos). Some of the blame can be laid at the feet of Thom and his cooky esoterism, but in any case this is a decidedly shady side of Saint Zeeman which is completely hidden from view here.137.205.183.31 (talk) 11:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It would need a reliable source to cite before anything along these lines could be included. For example are there articles that say these predictions turned out to be completely wrong? Billlion (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catastrophe hype 