lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Canadian Singles

message: I checked some sites and I founded a more longer list of sites who list Canadian charts http://www.alaskajim.com/charts/currentsingles/international/canada.asp and one of these links goes to Radio & Records 
http://www.radioandrecords.com/Formats/Charts/All_Charts.asp  I don't know if they could count as official as well —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sd-100 (talk • contribs) 8:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Others Canadian charts 

message: Since the Canadian Singles Chart had been incepted in 1996, should we include a list of their list as well since they co-existed with RPM from 1996 to 2000? However, it'll be more harder to find since the Internet archive don't have any back-up copies. --Sd-100 (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1996-2000 period 

message: I also taught of this, could the CHUM chart from its inception in 1957 could be the "official" list of number-one hits of Canada before the creation of RPM-magazine in 1964?--Sd-100 (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to include the CHUM charts from 1957 to 1963 as part of the official list of number-one hits of Canada --Sd-100 (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHUM chart before RPM magazine 

message: I don't know if it's a good idea or not but as a suggestion, I wonder if it could be possible to add to the Canadian Singles Template, the lists of the number-one digital songs? --Sd-100 (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! :-) Sd-100 (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Per WP:NAVBOX: "Finally, external links should not be included in navigation templates." Including these as external links is trying to get around the fact that the digital song number-one lists were deleted by consensus as not notable. Please do not ignore or try to circumvent that consensus. WP:DRV exists if you wish to revisit those articles' deletion. Ss112 11:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize for the late reply, but is it far-fetched to think then it looks like what some people thought at Wikipedia is waste, it's a treasure for Infogalactic (it's more or less based on the old saying "One man's trash is another man's treasure")? If you're a bit curious, I'll keep updating the list of number-one digital songs of 2024 (Canada) on Infogalactic. Sd-100 (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of number-one digital songs in the Canadian Single template
Talk:CosMc

message: This article has been deleted and its contents moved to the McDonaldland article per the discussion at Talk:McDonaldland
- Jeremy (Jerem43 14:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Does anyone have links to CosMc Commercials? 71.253.244.3 19:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old stuff
Template talk:Infobox martial art term

message: Shouldn't the title be centered in the headerbar rather than left-aligned? – ukexpat (talk) 02:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title position 

message: It would be great if someone generalized this template to make adding videos easier. As it is, videos can be added but video-only options (like thumbtime) cannot be added. Also, videos seem to be left-aligned even though the function for "pic" specifies center alignment. Bidouleroux (talk) 07:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a new  attribute which allows for freeform additions. This should allow you to add whatever additional parameters are needed. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video 

message: Are the countries of China, Japan and Korea the only to have developed Martial arts?  No, Martial arts or combatives are common to every culture so this infobox is not very flexible
--Hutcher (talk) 06:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason those languages are singled out is because they use a non-latin script. Martial arts developed in countries using a latin script don't need extra fields. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?

message: I need the template "Infobox martial art term" for capoeira kicks. But now I got redirected to "Infobox Chinese". Is there some alternative? --Mladifilozof (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This template is needed
Talk:Awatovi Ruins

message: Our article states, in Pre-European History, that "Awatovi was founded sometime after 1300..." In the next section, we say that Awatovi "had already been in existence for about 450 years" in 1540, when Spanish contact occurred. ??? TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in article re founding date of Awatovi 

message: Should there be some reference here to Christy Turner's belief that the Polacca Wash remains are those of Hopi massacred after the conflict of 1700?  The site was extremely important in the development of the Anasazi cannibalism theory.European Prehistorian (talk) 16:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polacca Wash
Talk:UCI Road World Championships – Men's time trial

message: I came to this article "looking" for Times and distances? What distance do they cover and the times please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.207.64 (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times and distances? 
Talk:William H. Gerstenmaier

message: The GAO issued a statement in January of 2015, outlining the decision to deny SNC's protest. 
GAO disagreed with Sierra Nevada’s arguments about NASA’s evaluation, and found no undue emphasis on NASA’s consideration of each offeror’s proposed schedule, and likelihood to achieve crew transportation system certification not later than 2017.  GAO also noted that, contrary to Sierra Nevada’s assertions, the RFP clearly advised offerors that their proposals would be evaluated against the goal of certification by the end of 2017. 
GAO concluded that SNC's arguments were not supported by the evaluation record or by the terms of the solicitation.     
Press release: http://www.gao.gov/press/pr_statement_sierra_nevada_bid_protest.htm
Summary and decision: http://www.gao.gov/products/B-410485,B-410485.2,B-410485.3
HEO-PAO (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: GAO decision on SNC protest

message: William Gerstenmaier is to receive an award  "Recogizing Excellence In Space Outreach" at the World Space Week Awards Reception on March 3, 2009.  I don't presently see a posting at WorldSpaceWeek.org, but presuming one is forthcoming, a reference or press release may soon be available to cite.  Tomligon (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award 

message: (Quote):  In 2002, Gerstenmaier was named Manager of the International Space Station Program. Mike Suffredini replaced Gerstenmaier as the International Space Station Program manager.
(end Quote)
Could anyone please explain the difference between
"Manager of the International Space Station Program"
and
"International Space Station Program manager"
? Thanks!
Armchairastronaut (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on Wording/Title 
Talk:Districts of Rosario

message: The status of the Southwest District is puzzlingly unclear. Six districts are named and have statistics but only five are (or were) functional.  Is SW not yet split from another or dare municipal officers not go there to implement the reform or what?
Wikipedia is not meant to leave apparent contradictions hanging.--SilasW 19:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A district in limbo
Talk:Mom jeans

message: To start with how does the article open with "its a humorously pejorative term?" Humor is defined as being subjective. The old adage "everything that's funny hurts somebody," comes to mind, suggested that everything perjorative is humorous. If you mean that its generally used in an innocuous sense, say that, however, DONT. SAY. SOMETHING. IS. FUNNY. AS. IF. ITS. A. FACT. IN. AN. ENCYCLOPEDIA!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:600A:3E:E06B:24E7:73AF:536C (talk) 01:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: To fix this article

message: By the way, not all jeans are above the ankle some are full length 86.19.166.109 (talk) 11:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeans
Talk:Geup

message: Isn't the red belt in it too? Isn't it the belt before the brown belt?--Razionale (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red belt? 

message: It seems to me that kup/geup/gup is just the Korean form of kyū.  Is there any reason for having a separate article, rather than simply mentioning this name there?
Moreover, which term is used in taekwondo?  I first heard of martial art grades from the Taekwondo chapter of Luke Jackson's book Freaks, Geeks and Asperger Syndrome, which mentions no other name than kup for this grade range.  This is consistent with it being a Korean martial art, but contradicts the kyū article at the moment, which states
"Coloured belts are worn by kyū ranked practitioners in many martial arts, including judo, karate, and taekwondo."
Anyhow, assuming my inkling is right, I propose that we add these names to the Kyū article, and redirect this article there.  Any problems with this? — Smjg (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - merging into Kyu article seems very sensible, as the Geup one is so small and unreferenced. Trafford09 (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Support The geup system is derived from the kyu sytstem, and has not evolved to the point where a wholly separate article is needed - they're essentially the same thing in different languages. Just as we don't have articles for both Lutefisk and Lipeäkala, so we should not have separate articles for geup and kyu. Yunshui 雲‍水 21:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kup, geup, gup and kyū
Talk:Jim Corey

message: There are two silent actors called Jim Corey  
* James Warren Corey (October 19, 1883 – January 10, 1956)
* Arthur Harrison Corey (March 22, 1889 – March 26, 1950)
The article had included bios from both. I have corrected this by making this page belong to Arthur Harrison Corey, who seems to be the most notable, with a long list of credits.  
I do not know if James Warren Corey was notable enough in his own right to warrant his own Wikipage.
Periglio (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article mixed up two people
Talk:The Brindley

message: I have proposed linking this article from the Culture section of the Cheshire portal, and if the article could be expanded to at least Start class this would be very useful. A photograph would be particularly nice -- from the RIBA link, it looks very striking. I've tried searching Geograph, but to no avail. Thanks, Espresso Addict (talk) 04:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the photo I have.  Its quality is not good, which is why I didn't include it earlier.  Will try to do better, but it's difficult to photograph.  The RIBA photo is taken from the other side of the canal, which is rather difficult to access.  I should have thought that the assessment should be higher than Stub, the WP definition of which is "An article considered too short to give an adequate introduction to a subject (often one paragraph or less)".  Not sure how to expand it with the evidence available but I'll have a look around. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Added another section. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can definitely go with Start now. If you can expand it further, that would be great. Espresso Addict (talk) 15:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:List of National Historic Landmarks in Arizona

message: Per discussion at Talk page of WP:NRHP of what should warrant Stub/Start/B/FL class rating for a list-table, I think this article merits "Start" rating within WP:NRHP, because:
#It is a "useful" list in the sense required in WP:WIAFL
#It is factually accurate as far as it goes. Support for all facts about NHLs within are supported by the corresponding articles, I think.
#It is comprehensive, listing all the NHLs in AZ.
#There should not be controversy about its scope, it is a factual matter what sites are NHLs and which are not.
#It displays photos of some of its items
#There is an article of at least Stub class for every item on the list.
#Reference supporting completeness (first External link) is provided.
It's still a low rating, so I am going ahead and rating it myself, although I am one of the main authors. doncram 15:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fair to me. I added the rest of the table descriptions, and a notes section. Pete Tillman 20:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality rating of this list-table article for WP:NRHP

message: I've changed the Painted Desert Inn to Apache County because of clear map evidence.  Both the coords given for it as an NHL and the coords given for it as an NRHP site put it on this little road (near I-40 and west of Navajo) and within a tiny distance (if at all) from a site that looks like the place and that is labelled "Painted Desert Inn" by Google Maps.  This result is achieved both with Google Maps and with Mapquest.  Moreover, the Apache/Navajo county line shown on Mapquest is very near the Inn, but there's no question that it's on the eastern (i.e. Apache) side of the line.  Nyttend (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painted Desert Inn
Talk:Vomitorium

message: A picture would be nice —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.139.115.211 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 29 September 2007
:Done. Dyfsunctional 18:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: Weren't some of the privies in Roman ruins mistaken for vomitoria?  
^^^^^^^^
I'd like to see more citations.
Pittsburgh Poet (talk) 10:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "And hygene.  They did give us hygene." 

message: When did it become appropriate to define the slang term and then proceed to use that term for the rest of the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bofum (talk • contribs) 21:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikiproject:crap articles? 

message: You donna vomit in Vomitoriums, i knew that sonny Myles325a (talk) 07:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  no vomiting here 

message: In the "Misinterpretation of the term" section, one of the explanations of the misinterpretation was "According to Cicero, Julius Caesar escaped an assassination attempt because he felt ill after dinner. Instead of going to the latrine, where his assassins were waiting, he went to his bedroom and avoided assassination." I don't see how this explains the misuse as the term is used not a single time. 
In the same section another explanation is given: "Other sources[who?] say that Aldous Huxley was the first to use the misinterpretation in his book Antic Hay[6] in 1923, in the sentence: “There strode in, like a Goth into the elegant marble vomitorium of Petronius Arbiter, a haggard and dishevelled person”." In here the use of vomitorium does not seem incorrect.
Perhaps someone could rephrase in other to better give the intended interpretation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.6.234.57 (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the misconception mistake?
Category talk:Demographics by country

message: you forot demographics of iran --Englishazadipedia 20:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment from 2007

message: Can Categories not be moved? Considering demograpohics of Europe and the Isle of Man go under here, shouldn't the category be retitled Demographics by area? Yohan euan o4 (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Remember (Irving Berlin song)

message: There is no doubt as to the notability of this song. While there is no official rule on what constitutes a notable song, two that have been proposed are "...has been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups" (see Wikipedia:Notability (music)) and "...Is a musical standard (e.g. a pop or jazz standard)" (see Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wizard-Musical notability). By either criterion, this song is notable. -- BRG 20:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Landscape with the Fall of Icarus

message: "The painting seems to depict humankind's indifference to suffering by highlighting the ordinary events which continue to occur, despite the unobserved death of the mythic figure Icarus, who is seen drowning in the bottom right area of the sea." - This seems to be a better description of the W.H. Auden poem's attitude toward the painting than the painting itself. For example, in the article on the Auden poem, it says "Art historians maintain that for Brueghel, Icarus was an example of foolishness, not suffering, but Auden was writing the poem as a 20th-century observer, not a scholar." which seems contradictory to the above assertion.
:Reasonable point, but in this case de Vries, Lyckle, "Bruegel's "Fall of Icarus" (see further reading), analyzing art historical coverage, finds that Auden's interpretation has largely been accepted by art historians as reflecting at least part of the artist's intention. I hope to add to the article on this. One can both be foolish and suffer, indeed the point was that one followed the other. Johnbod (talk) 13:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Who did that painting?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.106.240.10 (talk) 09:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Th fall of icarus painting. 

message: The second version of the painting housed by Van Buuren Museum in Brussels does not display Icarus on the air. In this painting, which is much smaller (90x63 cm), Icarus is still in the sea; the flying figure is his father Deadelus. Besides this copy is an oil-on-wood as opposed to the original oil-on-canvas painting.--Berkanulu (talk) 12:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: van Buuren
Talk:Downing Street Chief of Staff

message: Is is "Chief of Staff" of "chief of staff" ?--Philip Baird Shearer 20:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Two references used on this page say directly contradictory things about whether Jeremy Heywood was or wasn't Downing Street Chief of Staff. For what it's worth, I've just had a flick through 'What Does Jeremy Think' by Suzanne Heywood and while it says that Gordon Brown said "...I want you to become my chief of staff", it goes on to explain that a compromise meant that Heywood would become Permanent Secretary to Number 10 from January 2008 (Heywood p 209). Other than that, I can't find any other reference to Heywood being Chief of Staff. FollowTheTortoise (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeremy Heywood
Talk:Phenomenology of religion

message: There needs to be a separation between the use of phenomenology of religion as the comparative investigation of religious phenomena and as the discipline that was the direct reaction of religious evolutionism and focuses on religious experience. This article mixes both very different approaches as the same thing. Can we create a religious evolutionism page? Zolotoi kryzhovnik (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edits Needed 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=Buddhist+phenomenology&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--222.67.204.113 (talk) 07:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A red link in the discussion page is associated with the following... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+Christian+phenomenology&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.67.204.113 (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI... 

message: I hope someone with expert knowledge of this can clean up the introduction. As it is, it is vague and could use more examples before jumping into the history of religious phenomenology. Philosopher2king (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I will work on cleaning this up when I get back to campus. I wrote a paper about religious phenomenology that summarized the major thinkers. I think it should help. Rudolf Otto is super significant to religious phenomenology and I'm confused why he isn't included here. Zolotoi kryzhovnik (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction needs Cleaning
Talk:Arare

message: This is a disambiguation page. Previously, the main page redirected to Japanese destroyer Arare, but the talk page redirected to Talk:Arare (food). Douggers (talk) 06:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab page

message: The Wiktionary link goes to arare, a verb in both the Italian and the Spanish language. I have the distinct impression that this link is not really pertinent to this lemma. Greetz -- Idler writing under 91.36.87.130 (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fine. So long as there is a link, the Wiktionary box serves its purpose. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Wiktionary link?
File talk:Japan yashima.png

message: Iki and Oki on this map do not correspond with the islands named that today.  What's marked as "Iki" is called Oki today, and Iki is used for the island between Tsukushi/Kyushu and Tsushima.  Is this map in error, or have the names Iki and Oki shifted?  If so, that should be explained in the articles that use this image Nik42 20:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the map was in error. I've switched the two in the new version. --JWB 21:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Iki and Oki
Talk:Gimma (rapper)

message: Is the a stressed? Seems odd that it would be given its full value otherwise. kwami (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation dubious 
Talk:Rowena

message: I realise there is a DAB page Rowena and so the name alone is not enough here, but do we have to have the preposterous and completely misleading "Rowena, Queen of Britain"? I have never seen her referred to as such in any text. Presumably it's because of Gwrtheyrn sometimes being called "High King" by modern writers - but if such an institution existed, which is extremely doubtful - he would have been overlord of the Brythons and not "King of Britain". In a word, although the name is very romantic and poetical it has no foundation in fact or legend. How about Rowena (Rhonwen)? Anything but "Queen of Britain"! Enaidmawr (talk) 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Rowena, daughter of Hengest" seems like the best name for her. However, I'm not sure that it shouldn't just be "Rowena", with the disambiguation page at Rowena (disambiguation). This character seems to be the primary (and probably first) use of the name.--Cúchullain t/c 07:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that plain 'Rowena' would be best, for the reasons you state and because that is how she is always referred to. I was tempted to make the change yesterday but was put off by the amount of links on the disambiguation page Rowena. 'Rowena, daughter of Hengest' is perfectly acceptable as well, although I'd prefer the name by itself. The second option's easy; any volunteers for the first, assuming there are no objections? Enaidmawr (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there have been no objections I've made the move, and transferred the info on her name over from the disambiguation page (which is at Rowena (disambiguation) now).--Cúchullain t/c 20:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, Cuchullain. After raising the issue in the first place I'd managed to forget about it until I saw the change on my watchlist. A great improvement! Enaidmawr (talk) 00:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: What source says that Hengest of Kent was a Jute?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Æscing (talk • contribs) 02:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hengest a Jute