lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ibero-Caucasian languages

message: 213.157.209.197 is Levzur, in case anyone's wondering... -- ChrisO 15:58, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Odd, this page was supposed to be unprotected already. I guess it was just overlooked. Anyway, the reason this page was protected and that there's so much strife over it is because there's one particular user who went by the name of Levzur who is fanatically dedicated to making this and several other articles conform to his personal point of view, despite all attempts by others to fix problems with it. This happens from time to time here on Wikipedia, and when all else fails the user in question usually winds up being banned. Levzur's case is still being examined but in the meantime we've taken to temporarily banning him whenever he tries messing with these articles, so it should be safe to go ahead and edit now without fear of your changes getting lost in an endless edit war. Bryan 23:21, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

text: OK for the move, but note that the Arnold Chikobawa institute page (which according to Levzur supported the genetic relationship theory) uses "Iberian-Caucasian linguistics", so this version should be mentioned as an alternative.Jorge Stolfi 09:09, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous reversions
Talk:Frank Ramsey (mathematician)

message: Anyone know what to do with this non-sentence?
:Ramsey's contributions extended to the field of set theory and logic where he showed that the removing the axiom of reducibility from a proposed set of axioms for set theory.
--Dante Alighieri 05:56 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)
I worry that this page is illegally reliant on http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/1810/3484/1/Ramsey.html which reproduces a copyrighted article on Ramsey from Philosophy 70 (1995): 243-262. Tcassedy 21:24, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you worry that, specifically? Pcb21| Pete 14:38, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, because some of the language is identical. Tcassedy 05:27, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: some of the quotations are identical (from Ramsay's brother, and from I A Richards) - maybe this article should be cited as a source for those quotations.  But as far as I can see, the technical discussion isn't reliant on that article. BdC 21:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In economics Ramsey is known as much for the Ramsey Growth model as he is for Ramsey pricing. I can't find a Wiki entry for Ramsey growth model. I'll try to expand this soon.radek 06:53, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ramsey Growth model

message: 'The Ramsey model is today acknowledged as the starting point for optimal accumulation theory although its importance was not recognized until many years after its first publication.'
If you click on Optimal Accumulation Theory, you are led to Turnpike Theory, where Ramsey's name is not mentioned. Pamour (talk) 14:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  optimal accumulation theory 

message: I've read this paper and it doesn't mention monopolists. In fact it is much more general and describes optimal taxation whether the supply is monopolistic or not. Ramsey actually said that taxation should be proportional to the sum of the reciprocals of the elasticities of supply and demand, not just to elasticity of demand. The only role for a monopolist is to set the markup. So it refers to an organisation like a government or like a supermarket in a monopoly/monopsony position buying from multiple suppliers and selling to multiple consumers. This needs to be referenced and changed. -- Derek Ross | Talk 00:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A contribution to the theory of taxation 

message: While Frank Ramsey was certainly a mathematician, he made contributions in many fields; perhaps the parenthetical should be removed, and the name of the article changed to "Frank Plumpton Ramsey" to disambiguate between Ramsey and the basketball player?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Closed Limelike Curves (talk • contribs) 02:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referring to Ramsey as (mathematician)
Talk:4th Armored Division (United States)

message: 4th Armored Div was not existance post 1971/2 timeframe.  Check General Wallace bio.
Tom Roberts
4th AD 66/68
Suggest revising the closing paragraph to acknowledge 4th AD's 14 years of Cold War service in Germany, its longest period of activation, as follows:
"The Division was reactivated in 1954 at Fort Hood Texas and was deployed to Germany in 1957 with headquarters in Göppingen. There it remained until final inactivation in 1971, when it was redesignated the 1st Armored Division."
John Francis, 4th AD 1966-68—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.107.59.21 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 25 May 2005.
I agree!!!  My father was in the 4th AD from 1957-1959.  He took basic training at Ft. Hood and then the Division was moved to West Germany.  He spent the remainder of his enlistment at Erlangen. I still have his old Ike jacket with the 4th AD crest on the shoulder and SP4 insignia in the new "Army green" that didn't match the color of the Ike jacket, as well as his "yearbook" from basic training and his overseas cap with light-blue Infantry braid.--MarshallStack 03:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think someone is confused. When the commander said that "4th Armored Division" was name enough, he meant that no further nickname was required. "Name Enough" was not its nickname, surely. Or am I confused? Ifnkovhg (talk) 05:42, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official nickname 

message: There needs to be an order of battle for the 4th Armored, including all constituant units such as Tank Btl's and Infantry Btl.--86.21.136.74 (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Constituant Units
Talk:Moneyness

message: I would say that explanations of this page are very confusing. Many more references to other explanations in wikipedia needed in order for this article to be of popular use.
I reverted the initial paragraph back from stock option to option as this concept is more general than just for stocks. I know some of the pages are still too stock-oriented but we can work on that. Hope that's ok. Pete 07:25 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)
*i wonder if the name "Moneyness" is really correct?! .. the Cambridge dictionary does not know such a word!?! ...Sicherlich 13:02, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I see both terms in use on the Internet - are both correct?  Is there a region difference in usage (eg UK versus US?) If both are correct presumably both should be mentioned in the article (with usage notes if applicable). Roy Badami (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out-the-money vs. Out-of-the-money 

message: I was confused upon reading the article's definition of this word. "-ness" implies a quality, where the definition at the lead of the article, doesn't describe a quality, but rather the likelihood that a derivative has a positive value (my assumption is that if -ness describes the abstract quality of something, it should reflect both +ve and -ve values). The OED definition makes a lot more sense in terms of the -ness suffix: "The degree to which an asset can be considered to be equivalent to money, liquidity; the value of an asset in terms of money." (3rd ed.). There may be a disparity between the way in which the word/concept is used practically today, and the way in which it was used historically (the OED provides citations back to 1936, such as the following: "1964    J. Gould & W. L. Kolb Dict. Social Sci. 438/2   It is apparent, of course, that any set of assets will possess a spectrum of ‘moneyness’."). Assuming that the concept reflected in the current Wikipedia article reflects practical usage today (and does not arise from error), would it be worth also providing the OED sense of "moneyness"? --Oldak Quill 01:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  OED definition 
Talk:Spratly Islands

message: I don't know when exactly this map was made but it must be after 1843 because Thanh Hoá 清化 is on the map. Before 1843 it's called Thanh Hoa 清華 (source official Nguyễn dynasty history: Đại Nam thực lục Vol 32). --KomradeRice (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanh Hoá (清化) is on a newer map in 1882 which means that the previous map in 1838 issued by the Nguyễn Dynasty is correct PhamHoangThạch (talk) 02:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "An 1838 Unified Dai Nam map" is not from 1838 

message: :
::The response is to a comment which was previously stricken, and I can't find the para at issue in the current article version. Also, the respondent is apparently unaware of WP:V. I've stricken the response. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need better sources 

message: Addition to the "Military conflicts and diplomatic dialogues" subsection:
In 2022, Vietnam demanded that Taiwan cease conducting its military drills at the Spratly Islands. 118.158.161.49 (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2022 

message: The article distorts history baselessly and misdirects public opinion, Why did their feudal China not control and exercise sovereignty over Hoang Sa and Truong Sa, but they still have fabricated maps created by they created??? Vietnam has all the legal and historical evidence to prove that the 9-dash line and 2 archipelagos belong to Vietnam, China in the Qing Dynasty only had its southern pole Hainan Island, And why is China's sovereignty legal? rate??? They invaded Vietnam 1974 in Hoang Sa, and 1988 in Changsha and there is no reason for them to stop expanding outside, Stupid author only knows Get money from China to create bullshit PhamHoangThạch (talk) 01:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoang Sa and Truong Sa belongs to Vietnam, Trash article of China
Talk:Finch

message: The American "rosefinches" are shown as a distinct clade here on the same level as the multigeneric arid-zone clade, but are still placed in Carpodacus, which as all wikipedia articles acknowledge as having been found to be quite different. Can they be given their own genus, Burrica? (this is a subgeneric name from an old AOU checklist, which according to Taxonomy in Flux is the available name for these species) At what pace does wikipedia proceed on such issues? For now I'll just add Burrica as a synonym and maybe make a note on this page, etc., etc.--Innotata 17:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know what I meant by this: see the relevant articles Innotata 19:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Burrica'' 

message: Just wondering, but how come they are in the family "finch"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.85.146 (talk) 21:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific Classification? 

message: I have recently read that as of 1929 – a long time ago – at least 62 finch species had been discovered in Nearctic North America. I think that’s not a negligible number. In the first paragraph the Southern Hemisphere, the Neotropics, the Hawaiian Islands and the Palearctic are mentioned as their home, but it might be a good idea to say something about North American finches as well, not necessarily in the introduction if you don’t consider that number of species to be important enough, but perhaps in a distribution section. --186.108.175.201 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the taxonomy is out of date; excluding introductions and rarities, there are about 16 finches in the US/Canada, and six of those also occur in Eurasia Jimfbleak -  talk to me? 06:30, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American finches 

message: Hello,
In the right hand illustration, Finch is shown to be in Class: Reptilia. That is not correct.
Can someone please remove that classification since I am not sure how to edit it.
Thank you,
Peter  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:196:4802:B930:28E9:686A:F443:95D0 (talk) 19:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finch is not in class Reptilia 

message: "Originally, Darwin did not discern that all the finches were the same species..." reads the summary.
How's that? First, there are many species, not just one. Second, the Galapagos finches Darwin used to create a model of organic evolution aren't even true finches, as the Wikipedia page on them declares. Mucketymuck (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin's use of finches, as mentioned here
Talk:Sebastian, King of Portugal

message: Thank you for including the familial chart showing the structure of parents, grandparents, and great grandparents. While I grasped what was being said in the article relating to this, the chart really helped to visually clarify. I found it very complimentary to this great article.
Wow, so his parents were genetically siblings both having the same four grandparents. His failure to produce children was probably a blessing to the Throne of Portugal. Cosnahang (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geneology chart 

message: Aleixo de Meneses the  "aio" of Sebastian was the person incharge of taking care of the prince and  of his education. Luís Gonçalves da Câmara was the teacher of the prince.    
I translated "aio" as tutor and left Luís Gonçalves as teacher which was what he was.
The article is written by someone who is not up to date on the historiography of Sebastian. It ignores his most recent biographer, Maria Augusta Lima Cruz, and the critique of her bio in the Portuguese Studies Review, vol. 18:2 (2011), pp. 163-169. As often is the case, Wikipedia articles are not written by authorities but amateurs. People as a result often don't trust it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.202.17 (talk) 23:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tutor

message: The intro of an article shouldn't be a mini genealogy.  It is to provide immediate context. In this case, what is the useful context - where does this person fit within the royal families of Iberia.  We name his parents, we indicate he was grandson of two kings.  Is anybody really going to understand this person's relevance by knowing his maternal grandmother was Isabella of wherever?  If they are interested, they can follow links, or just look at the genealogical table in the same article, rather than having this formulaic "His paternal grandparents were . . .", there just to be there. Agricolae (talk) 22:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming grandmothers in intro 

message: There is no one citation on this article.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 00:17, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am trying to give you the citation you need for the horoscope reference. It is to Harold Johnson, "Um horoscopio feito por ocasiao do nascimento de D. Sebastiao (1554-1578)" in Harold Johnson, Camponeses e Colonizadores (Lisbon: Ed. Estampa, 2002), pp. 142-166. (He publishes the horoscope and an analysis of it).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.202.17 (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Denis of Portugal

message: In correct Portuguese this should surely read "Livro das Leis e Posturas", with "das" (= "of the" plural) rather than "da" ("of the" singular), since both "Leis" and "Posturas" are plural.188.230.248.85 (talk) 18:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks, Carlstak (talk) 06:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Livro da Leis e Posturas"
Talk:Anaerobic organism

message: What about facultative anaerobes in nash equilibrium? will they just stay at the bottom of the test tube anyway?
A0032041 19:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, like us, plants use both aerobic and anaerobic respiration. They do use oxygen. They need the CO2 and water for photosynthesis, which produces O2 (molecular oxygen, the kind we breath), some water and sugars.  Some of this O2 goes back out into the atmosphere, but some stays in the plant, and is used in its own aerobic respiration. I believe that some oxygen also enters through pores in the leaves during nighttime. RK 20:00 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)
When light is present, plants are essentially photosynthetic organisms. As such, they are neither aerobic nor anaerobic, because these terms apply on how oxigen is used (i.e. metabolized, or consumed). Plants do not use oxygen during photosyntesis, they produce oxygen. That's why we use the term oxygenic photosynthesis instead. Other organisms (some bacteria) carry out a different type of photosynthesis that does not release oxygen, called anoxygenic photosynthesis. 
At night, or whenever light is not present, plants switch to a respiratory metabolism. Now they do consume oxygen to produce energy, and so we can say that they are aerobes, the same as all animals. The difference is that animals are allways aerobes, while plants are only at night.
--Xavi 21:19, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Micromole is not a unit of concentration. What does mean "micromolar concentration of oxygen" or "nanomolar" or "200 micromoles"? Remember, that at 25 centigrade the concentration of oxygen in air is ca. 8000 micromol/dm3, not 200.
84.10.111.253 09:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micromolar? 

message: is there a history to the discovery of these organisms?  where are they found today?
Microcosmmm (talk) 05:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: — Assignment last updated by Rico.schultz (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Physiological Ecology of Animals
Talk:Topfreedom

message: Please consider globalize game this article. I’ve removed the orange box warning template because this issue in this article does not create any danger to the reader. Anybody can see that it’s about the geographic areas mentioned in the table of contents.  The warning box is an example of tag bombing. Jehochman Talk 03:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: I don't really have time to go through it right now, so am posting it so others can to see if there's anything worthwhile to add to the Wiki article. https://www.twincities.com/2019/07/10/cops-called-when-woman-goes-topless-at-duluth-beach-but-was-she-breaking-the-law/ Phantom in ca (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  news article re. recent MN incident 

message: This is a case to watch. Tilli Buchanan, a 27 yo UT stepmom and her husband took off their tops inside their garage after doing some physical labor. Her 3 step kids saw her. Their mother reported it to their social worker who reported it to the police. Charges have been filed. Trial is set to begin 2019 Nov 19. Her attorney will use the 10th Circuit federal win against Fort Collins in her defense. 
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2019/09/30/this-utah-woman-was/ 
Phantom in ca (talk) 20:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA: Utah state criminal prosecution under lewdness vs federal appeals court topfreedom win 

message: https://www.foxnews.com/us/colorado-woman-cited-topless-awarded-50g-settlement 
https://denver.cbslocal.com/2019/11/08/effie-krokos-topless-loveland-settlement/
Phantom in ca (talk) 02:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Colorado woman cited for going topless awarded $50G settlement" 

message: Here's 2 news articles re. topfreedom in OK after the federal circuit court win. Topfreedom for Sand Springs: https://www.tulsaworld.com/communities/sandsprings/topless-but-not-obscene-is-ok-for-sand-springs-police/article_8db555f7-bf41-5cf9-a6ba-38112cd4ea67.html Just going topless is okay, but no lewdness or obscenity. Continued discrimination for Tulsa: https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/tulsa-police-will-resume-enforcing-ban-on-women-going-topless/article_9c8ba1e3-bea4-5171-9196-95027146860b.html This post is in case someone wants to add this info to main article. Phantom in ca (talk) 06:16, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Topfreedom confusion in Oklahoma 

message: :c:Category:Protest by the »Hedonistische Internationale - Sektion Wilde Möpse« in Berlin-Kreuzberg, Mariannenplatz, in support of topfreedom after an incident at the Plansche playground --C.Suthorn (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany 2021 

message: The Taiwan section in inappropriately sourced (only primary online sources of dubious quality/reliability), which leads to notability and possibly correctness of that section being unclear.--Kmhkmh (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwan
Talk:Demchugdongrub

message: I have made some technical changes in the names section: I always assumed that Demchugdongrub was some transcription from Mongolian, not (directly) from Tibetan. For brevity, I also deleted transcriptions of transcriptions -they look basically similar to what is already there. Teh wang is probably the most common name in English, so it of course remained. The translation of the first character of the Chinese transcription of his name, 德, in this context seemed entirely irrelevant, about as useful translating the "Mao" in "Chairman Mao". De Noyon looks more like a generic form of adress (Mr. De, not really sure here, though, but it was unsourced anyway). I also deleted another form of adress (德王爺) that was not sourced. Yaan (talk) 22:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: In regard to the "weasel words" template, please state the type of problem that you see in this article with at least one specific example. --Bejnar (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel words

message: A better translation from mongolian is "Demchigdonrov" not Demchugdongrub, it should be changed to this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.227.33.141 (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name is incorrect
Talk:Soong Mei-ling

message: In the 'Death' section, there is a sentence that reads as follows: 'Jia Qinglin, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), sent a telegram to Soong's relatives where he expressed deep condolences on her death.' (emphasis added). To me, this is worded improperly, as telegram is usually used in reference to the wireless telegram. However, the source reads as follows: 'Jia Qinglin, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), sent a message to the relatives of Madame Soong to mourn her death, calling Soong a noted and influential person in the modern era of Chinese history, who had been dedicated to the Chinese people's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, opposed to separating the nation, and hopeful for the peaceful reunification across the Taiwan Straits and the flourishing of the Chinese nation.' (emphasis added). I do not believe the replacement of the word message with telegram is a wise decision, as it's connotation is that Jia Qinglin used a wireless telegram to send his message to the family of Soong Mei-ling when that does not appear to be the case.
I believe the sentence should read as follows: 'Jia Qinglin, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), sent a message to Soong's relatives where he expressed deep condolences on her death.'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.104.173 (talk) 02:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telegram? 
Talk:Marc-Vivien Foé

message: Such a wonderful person. I also added "the" in front of the word "hospital". I hope you don't mind.--'Angel' 17:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marc-Vivien 

message: The second external link is http://www.marcvivienfoe.com, however it redirects to http://www.olweb.fr/ which is the official site of the Olympique Lyonnais. There is no reference to Foé himself on this link.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.194.50.108 (talk) 21:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  marcvivienfoe.com 

message: Might it be possible for someone to add a slightly higher-quality image? Seems a shame that this is the best we can do for a footballer of Foé's stature.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.130.249 (talk) 19:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image