lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Charles Santore

message: An earlier stub of this article was deleted some years ago, but I believe this article better establishes the subject's notability.Bellczar 19:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks good but would benefit from citations to enable the reader to verify what is written. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The ref in the journal Communicatation Arts  will contain lots of detail.... unfortunately I only have access to the abstract. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Plus One (band)

message: In my objective opinion - I am neither Christian nor anti-Christian, and feel similarly about these types of bands - the introduction to this article is very wrong. It gives very little information except for a single obscure factoid which is blurted out and left alone. That factoid would also seem to downplay the entire existence of the band, which is rather counterproductive to the whole object of an encyclopedic article. Now, it may be true.. However, if it is, it should be supported with multiple references, to show that it is indeed sound and objective. It should also be buffered with alternate viewpoints and placed further down in the article where argumentative, possibly opinionated information belongs. It certainly should not be presented as the entire summary of this musical group's pertinent qualities. Kiyura (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd Introduction 

message: The addition of the 20th anniversary of The Promise is lacking a lot. It's not clear how reaching the milestone means they've reunited. Are they somehow celebrating with a tour (not likely with the current COVID-19 situation)? Are they releasing a remastered edition of the work? Could that just be the label and the band are not together? Ideally, we need a :WP:SECONDARY source that discusses the full details of this work to determine how to modify the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  20 years since ''The Promise'' 
Talk:CELSR1

message: The function section appears to be not only outdated and incorrect (CELSR1 has been known for over 15 years to be expressed in lots of organs besides the brain!) but also is precisely identical to the text in the cited NCBI Gene entry.  Lccoffin (talk) 04:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function section is plagiarized?
Talk:Ongud

message: At least online, "Ongut" seems to be much more popular than "Ongud". Do we have a Mongolian spelling (classic or modern)? --Latebird 19:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have "Öngüt" in J.P. Roux. Best regards. PHG (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Onguds were Turks, not Mongols. The article itself suggested it, but many authors speak about them as being Turkic, including the contemporary sources. --Governor Sheng (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkic not Mongolic
Talk:Location transparency

message: Am I the only one that has a problem with the construction of this term? Transparency is the ability to see inside a system, but the property called "location transparency" is the opposite of transparency.  It is far more opaque than transparent; the physical location is hidden or obscured, by virtualization or abstraction.  Any one of the following terms seems much more suitable:  location abstraction, location virtualization, location hiding, location aliasing, location agnostic.
Of course, I can't use logic to alter how a term is already used, but if anyone knows how this term came about, this glaring contradiction needs to be addressed in the article.
AgentFriday (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposite Meaning
Talk:Grendel's Den

message: I removed the following:
Since October of 1997, a notable ritual has occurred within the lowest basement of Grendel's Den — a ritual denied by some, yet embraced by most. For it has been claimed that if a patron is to espy a tall, hirsute man between the 7th and 13th day of Octoberhttp://www.kamashastra.com/kama209.htm — who is, ofttimes, compared in appearance with Edward Norton from the film American History X — and subsequently utters the word 'Πεολειχία' (peoleichia) unto him, he will, indeed, lure the patron into the lowest chamber of the dark, malodorus basement, and perform the most foul, barbarous and starkly revolting act fathomable. The act itself generally remains unknown or is, otherwise, seldom uttered; though nevertheless, the very essence of this act is frequently conjectured by many enthusiasts.
For the following reasons:
* It's unencyclopediac in tone
* There's no citation (the given one cannot possibly count as fact)
* It sounds like a prank
* It's extremely vague
Feel free to add it back (I've preserved it above) if you can add support for it. Fogster 19:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content Removal 

message: Why is this article written in the past tense?  The establishment still exists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.0.26 (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense 
Talk:Vampire Hunter D (novel)

message: I heard it was 'Lamica' or 'Lamika' rather than 'Ramika' but 'Larmica'? Tyciol (talk) 09:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Larmica?

message: Vampire Hunter D: Vampire Hunter D and Vampire Hunter D (novel) should redirect here. -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: redir
Talk:Waltham Forest Guardian

message: See discussion: Talk:Newsquest#Conflation of Your Local Guardian and East London and West Essex Guardian Bogger (talk) 09:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: 4½ years later and still doesn't seem to have been addressed by any of the authors of this article. I've added a couple of cleanup tags to the page as I don't have the time or knowledge of the subject to make the changes myself. 2.31.178.128 (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflation of [[Your Local Guardian]] and [[East London and West Essex Guardian]]
Talk:Elyon: Return of the Queen

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Year Before (W.I.T.C.H. special issue) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Cornelia and Caleb: A Love Not Meant to Be

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:The Year Before (W.I.T.C.H. special issue) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Van-Pires

message: Snap's character bio says,
 In Van Pires: The Next Generation, he runs the junkyard. His daughter Amy, becomes one of the new generation Motor Vators.
What is this another TV show? It's the only mention of it on the page.  The only thing I've been able to find is this same sentance copied on a hundred other websites, and apparently It's theme song was Born to be Wild. Does anybody know anything about this ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.124.230.222 (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van Pires: The Next Generation 

message: There is no way that this is Gary Oldman as Van He'll Sing. The possibility is very out there and there is no evidence to support the claim. At the time of the show he was already a known actor. 199.125.67.200 (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a detail slipped in by an IP and since then other internet articles have used this as a source. It isn't true and there are no reference predated the insertion of that "fact" in this article. Dammitkevin (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

text: John Entwistle (composer of soundtrack) seems like a likely candidate for Van He'll Sing. Both have similar accents, but Van He'll Sing is so dressed up with a wig and big glasses its hard to actually confirm aside from tracking down the actors and asking. DontEatRawHagis (talk) 15:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Van He'll Sing - Gary Oldman
Wikipedia talk:Mintruth

message: Wikipedia:Mintruth
Mintruth
Mintruth
Mintruth
Mintruth
Mintruth
MINTRUTH!!!!
I'm sure you see what I mean. It's supposed to be Minitruth, not Mintruth.
209.180.233.206 20:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

message: dividing by 0... Zlqq2144 (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1.You are attempting to trick them...
Talk:Universal Technical Institute

message: Sometime back, I added a "references" template to this article since no verifiable third party citations or sources are given.  Since that time, the banner has been removed.  Still, no sources have been given.  It would be nice to add sources instead of just deleting the banner.  Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 19:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs citations or references from reliable/verifiable sources 
Talk:Indianapolis City-County Council

message: The page has been protected due to the edits/reverts of EColeman56.  Here's the situation:
On one side you have EColeman56 who says that Indianapolis lists its At Large councilors before district councilors.
On the other side you have everyone else who has commented on the situation so far who say that Wikipedia's standards are to list At Large councilors at the bottom of the list (HoosierState can come in and edit the links to other such lists).
So, if there's anything new to report, please do so here.
-- JTHolla! 13:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Heres the link that Jason mentioned. When I created the article I looked around at similar articles so this one would be consistent with the rest. Thanks to whomever protected the page. HoosierStateTalk 21:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection
Talk:What's the Flavor?

message: Lots of "opinion" content on the page, including text saying this was better than his previous album, and referring to two songs using non-encyclopedic term "club bangers".  Removed sentences.  Bobby Ganush (talk) 00:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed non-neutral content
Talk:Isoflavone-7-O-beta-glucoside 6"-O-malonyltransferase

message: There is a WP:Requested move discussion at Talk:3"-deamino-3"-oxonicotianamine reductase which may affect the naming of this article. You are invited to participate in that discussion, which should take place there, not here, in order to keep the discussion all in one place. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move discussion
Talk:Multi-chassis link aggregation group

message: The text looks like it was copied out of some technical journal which is re-inforced when you see verbage such as "A basic use of LAG to “trunk” 4 Ethernet links is shown in the figure below." which refers to a non-existent diagram. -- Whpq 20:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-paste

message: 1.  802.3ad has been moved to 802.1AX-2008.
2.  802.1AX specifically states that no options for "multipoint aggregation" among "more than two systems" are included.  All multipoint LAG operations fall into the non-standard realm of vendor-specific implementations.
3.  As noted previously, the content of the article seems to rely on an unattributed source, based on the language and phrasing used throughout.
As I understand it, there are discussions of standardizing MC-LAG from an LACP perspective, but I could not readily find any progress made in this area from an IEEE or IETF perspective.
It's also important to note that any work within the IETF's TRILL working group does not have an direct correlation to the aggregation of the links of a host in a multipoint configuration (such as Cisco's Virtual Port Channel).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccie14745 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of Inaccuracies 

message: The IEEE 802.1ax-2008 does define MC-LAG; the thing that's not standardized therein are some hash functions that are vendor specific. I'll try to find some secondary refs clarifying this and the purpose of MC-LAG as well, which is clear as mud from current writeup. Someone not using his real name (talk) 02:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factually incorrect (for about two years now) 

message: The MC-LAG is referred to as Distributed Resilient Network Interconnect (DRNI) in 802.1AX-2014 .
For an overview refer to the IEEE press release at: https://standards.ieee.org/news/2015/ieee_802_1ax.html
15.203.233.83 (talk) 22:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  MC-LAG is standardized as part of IEEE Std. 802.1AX-2014
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/canada.com

message: * Removed from monitor, user whitelisted.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are of course completely right (except that we would not want people involved in the website to add them en masse; and the existance of this list does not mean its use is discouraged, only that there may be a concern somewhere), I have again removed the link from the list, whitelisted another user, and protected against automonitoring.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Webb Miller (journalist)

message: The Pulitzer web site doesn't list Miller as a winner in any year. I can't find nominees on the site. The two references only say he was nominated in 1935, as far as I can tell. Rees11 (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *You are correct:  He was nominated three times, but never won. I added a cite to a book which lists nominees.  (I can find it in Google books, but that URL is temporary and I can't find a way to link permanently to it.) - Tim1965 (talk) 19:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulitzer prize?
Talk:Glacialisaurus

message: As a c;ose relative of Lufengosaurus should it not be placed in the same family Plateosauridae?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.39.238 (talk) 17:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, both should be in Massospondylidae (for the time being). J. Spencer (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Until the next paper comes out with a completely different analysis on early sauropodomorphs... ;) Firsfron of Ronchester 18:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where i can found information about that true Sauropods?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 15:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "also yielded remains attributed to true sauropods"
Talk:Myeloma protein

message: Hi I have never done anything other than read wiki articles.
But if somebody could do some research and correct a certain thing that might help. It says "free light chains" in serum or urine are called "bence jones" that may be true. But I just got a blood/urine test using IEP (immuno fixation electrophoresis) and the report says "major band" monoclonal free kappa light chain and "small band kappa" light chain (most likely bence jones) and also a "trace restriction" kappa light chain. Also it called each of these "migrating". That was for the serum, but for urine it only had two a major and trace with the same language as above for major and small band.
the "serum free light chain" was very informative and I like the proximal and distal what is/isnt absorbed. I am not a medical anything so somebody will have to contact somebody who is. thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.175.104.255 (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

message: Right now the image on the top right shows how the M gradient looks, but what I think is missing is a second image of a normal person.
If we could show both images then people could easily spot the difference. Right now they can not do so, from the page here alone.
On a slightly belated note, the image is a bit small - could it be made larger? 2A02:8388:1604:CA80:7AA0:255D:4602:ABA7 (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Hi, I find it odd that monoclonal protein, which is what the more recent literature calls myeloma proteins, does not have a page anywhere in wiki.  Is it worth creating a redirect to send it here?  Red Fiona (talk) 11:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be described as a monoclonal protein, but more specifically its a monoclonal antibody; so, that would be a better target. Klbrain (talk) 19:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   The problem is that monoclonal antibody is all about the therapeutics, rather than the protein produced by myeloma cells, which is what this article is about.  Red Fiona (talk) 19:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I think it would be confusing to many readers if we label it as a "monoclonal antibody". Monoclonal protein would be fine, IMO, and I think it's a reasonable redirect to use. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should monoclonal protein redirect here?
Talk:Wendell Mitchell Latimer

message: Is this the Latimer who invented Latimer diagrams, which show the relationships of various oxidation states and their reduction potentials? There doesn't seem to be an article on Latimer diagrams at the moment, I might start it off soon. Brammers (talk) 10:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More on his work
Talk:Central Kalahari Game Reserve

message: This photograph isn't taken in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve.86.33.92.121 (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Map 41.190.245.202 (talk) 21:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ganzi map 

message: We need some pictures of the game reserve. If you have any, please add them, either as a picture at. the start or under gallery ACBandsoon (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Fair use/Archive 1

message: We really do not understand the following passage for translation 
:I will try to clarify it for you. Alex756
 "In regards to the digital reproduction of images it may be argued that a lower resolution sample of the image (i.e. thumbnails) is a lesser sample of the image (the sound recording sample is not analogous here) and thus the whole image is only being approximated by the lower resolution sample (limiting futher reproduction outside an informational context)." 
Digital reproduction : reproduction of digital images ?
:No. It is a digital version of an image, i.e. you scan a photograph. --Alex756 
lower resolution sample (ie thumbnails) : does that mean that part of the image is extracted, resulting in a sample of the original image, of a smaller size, but same quality. Or does that mean the whole image is downsized, and subsequently may lose some quality ? Or does that combine both point ? extraction, and reduction of size ?
:A thumbnail is a small copy of the image. If you do a search on http://images.google.com/ you will get a list of thumbnails. Some people may call any smalller copy of an image a thumbnail, i.e. the digital reproduction is a thumbnail. Or it may be a reduced resolution version of a digital image, i.e. the original is 1200px x 800px and the reduced thumbnail is 300x200px. --Alex756 
the sound recording sample is not analogous here : is it sample as "a little piece of" or sample as an "electronic extraction" ? And is analogous here means "similar" or is it to be compared to "digital" ?
:"sampling" has been litigated in the context of musical sounds. Any sample, no matter how low the resolution (i.e. sampling rate in digital sound technology) of the sound, if it is a copy of a live sound. --Alex756 
Anthère 23:41, 15 September 2003 
:Hope that helps. I will look over the French version and see if it is inaccurate. Alex756 00:06, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: translation

message: Can someone explain, succinctly and to the point in the first few paragraphs, what exactly is fair use?  This is a term used only in the US, yet one has to go through all the officialese rumblings without getting a fair idea of what it is.  Essentially people who write this article knows what it is; people who don't in the first place would hardly benefit from reading the article.  Mandel 12:56, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)
It's tough to be succinct because fair use is deliberately non-specific. I'll try to make it clearer. Jamesday 16:59, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: needs better description

message: This might be a bit off topic, but would it be legal to download Amazon's music samples, convert them to OGG, and upload them to WikiMedia? -Archagon 23:16, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: can we upload amazon samples
Talk:Kwangju Foreign School

message: Maybe the references to Chris Paul Neil were a bit much. We in Korea though are recieving a lot of flack, and are having a hard time getting work permits because of added visa requirements. The powers that be are blaming the fact that Christopher Paul Neil was a teacher at Gwangju Foreign school for the addiional requirements for the visa.
This is an ongoing issue, and a thorn in a lot of peoples sides. The general public in Korea, and the expats are allways wanting to know the circumstances behind his last place of employment. I thus think there should be some mention about him in Wikipedias "Gwangju Foreign School"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugamalanga (talk • contribs) 17:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mugamalanga's comment

message: Interesting that the school has an ESL programe. Would have thought that students who had learned English in an English speaking country for 5 years would not need an ESL programe.
Strange that there is no direct link on the Christopher Paul Neil page to the Gwangju Foreign School. There is a link to the school he worked at in Thailand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.1.60 (talk) 15:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggestion to you is very simple: Write the articles with reliable sources. Do not add blog sources, your personal feeling, analysis, agendas.--Caspian blue 23:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ESL program
Talk:Eric Is Here

message: User:CorenSearchBot is not right. The text is not copied from http://www.mp3.com/albums/23360/summary.html - see references (E-Kartoffel 20:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CorenSearchBot
Talk:Cenarruza-Puebla de Bolívar

message: I'm translating it, all right? I published it by mistake Rsazevedo 20:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yehp, that's fine, just please leave a note next time as this could have easily been speedied according to speedy criteria. -Yupik 20:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion
Talk:Extension (model theory)

message: The definition I've seen for a "A a substructure of B" stipulates only that the interpretation of relation symbols in A be contained in the restrictions of their interpretations in B, not that they be equal.  I've changed the definition here accordingly. -- passerby 141.70.93.180 20:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you know where you saw that? It certainly isn't common in model theory. I checked Marker (2002) just now, for example. — Carl (CBM · talk) 21:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.  My sources seem to agree with yours.  (Don't know where I picked up that idea . . . .) I'll fix the page.  -- passerby 141.70.93.180 11:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a relief.  You should consider getting a username,by the way. It's anonymous and free. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  substructure