lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1782

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:32, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:1781

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:33, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: 11-December-2006:  The article "1781" had been a long list of Events, with no subheaders.  People tend to add and mix undated events anywhere, unless month-name subheaders are already in a yearly article.  I am adding 2 sets of month headers "January-June" and "July-December" as in other years of the 1780s. -Wikid77 12:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1780

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:34, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2004 comment 

message: 11-December-2006: As of November 2006, many years didn't have event images.  For the 20 yearly articles ("1770-1789"), I have been able to add images beside the corresponding text under Events, but that required moving the "Year-in-other-calendars" to the Births section (which is where it "appeared" to be in years with few events, by automatic formatting).  The new images now are near the corresponding Events text.  I also had to separate the Births section by a break-line:
::: 
            
The break-line pushes the subheader "Births" below any future Events images.  I have added images in a similar manner to the 1770s, 1780s, 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Among those 50 years, the various articles, originally, each had slightly different formats.  -Wikid77 01:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: 11-December-2006: As of December 2006, each year has a different format, as people add events or special subhead categories, "Nobel prizes" or "Ship events" and such. For example, year 1778 had month-name subheads parallel to the "Events" subhead (which had un-dated events with no months). I divided Events as 3 groups: January-June, July-December, and Unknown-dates. It seems that unless month names are identified in subheaders, the un-dated events get added into scattered locations. As with many Wiki articles, the format evolves, and multiple people must edit to maintain all 5 aspects: new facts, accurate facts, images, Wiki-format, and some consistency with related articles. It is too difficult to expect each person will master all 5 jobs.  -Wikid77 13:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:Go glossary

message: See http://senseis.xmp.net/?GoTerms for a very full listing.
Since both Korean- and Chinese-speaking players have their own terms, I think one should be careful with the introduction. What is true, is that the largest number of go technical terms used in English comes from Japanese usage. Historically, it is because players in the West learned from Japanese pros, and books and magazines translated from Japanese material.
Certainly sansan is a good example: it is the same is Chinese, Korean is samsam.
I think the best idea is to mention only words common in works in English, and other European languages.
Charles Matthews 12:38, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:1981

message: There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout. 
For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at). 
Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done. 
Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 13:51, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page layout years

message: Wheel of Fortune links to the disambiguation page. I'm not sure which article the link should link to, so someone else needs to change the link. -- VGF11 01:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheel of Fortune 

message: ...Why is the table of contents on the bottom of the page? Batsofdoom 00:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of contents

message: Hello. I removed this entry: 'December 9 - Jacob Stewart, St. Thomas based songwriter/guitarist'
The link was to a former MN Representative instead of a songwriter. I found no article on the songwriter. If I'm mistaken or confused (which I usually am), please fix it. Thanks! Apparition11 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacob Stewart 

message: Should the Superbowl be included for this year?  Centralized discussion at WT:YEARS#Superbowls — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 17:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superbowl 

message: See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page.  Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Eclipse]]s 

message: If people are in favor of a photo collage as seen from '87-2022, I would like to hear some consensus on thoughts about what images should be included in it. Thanks The ganymedian (talk) 22:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collage
Talk:1965

message: There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout. 
For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at). 
Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done. 
Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 14:06, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  2004 page layout years
Talk:Stelzer engine

message: I moved this from Frank Selzer, however neither he nor his invention seem to be terribly significant as evidenced with a Google search. And the version submitted by User:Wysocki1 even conceeds this, which leads me to believe this may be a vanity page and a possible VfD candidate (see revision history). Alcarillo 16:06, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

message: There is a lot more information in the German article. It just needs translating. Biscuittin (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  German wikipedia 

message: It is an opposing piston design, with two combustion chambers, rather than an opposed piston design with one combustion chamber. The central chamber seems to provide the equivalent of "crankcase compression" so no scavenge blower would be needed. According to the patent: "The power generated by the combustion can be transformed into work by the piston portions 16 and 18, in that, for example, in further chambers (not shown) still another medium can be periodically sucked in and exhausted. This medium can then drive other working machines, for example, turbines, in a further cycle (not shown)". Biscuittin (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposed/opposing, scavenging and output
Talk:Aston Clinton House

message: Text moved from the Halton House article to either merge here or to create a separate article for Green Park. -- Graham  :) | Talk 16:17, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Content now merged into article. -- Graham  :) | Talk 19:01, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Aston Clinton House. Go to the 1945 layer on Google Earth and you can see the house actually stood about 500 feet further west. The coordinates should be 51°47'39.43"N 0°43'8.86"W. The oval garden that was in front of the house is still there. It is visible in the late-1800s photo on wikipedia. 
—98.246.156.76 (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for pointing out the error. Deor (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:The Pall Mall Gazette

message: There are loads of gaps in the list of editors and owners.  Two more snippets of information I found, but couldn't add, were that James Louis Garvin was an editor under William Waldorf Astor's ownership, and that I think Edward James Nankivell edited the paper at one time.  fabiform | talk 17:07, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has the newspaper been digitised? There's a query here where editors with access to the digital version could help. Schwede66 17:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digitised?
Talk:Von Willebrand factor

message: Compliments for your edits, Marj (English is not my first language) but you removed a lot of links which IMHO should have remained. Free links are encouraged, and "double linking" might be commendable if the instances are very far apart. <BR>JFW | T@lk 17:08, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: More usefull information: http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/labmed/lab/coag/handbook/CO006200.htm --158.194.8.115 09:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ------------
"which cleaves vWF between tyrosine at position 842 and methionine at position 843 (or 1605–1606 of the gene)"
I may be wrong, but position 842 does not correspond to nucleotide 1605...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.245.1.1 (talk) 08:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: could use a x-ray crystal structure picture (?)

message: doi:10.1111/jth.12008 - review in JTH. JFW | T@lk 14:26, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: doi:10.1182/blood-2014-06-528406 physiology of production and clearance, Blood. JFW | T@lk 17:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Endothelial vWF modulates angiogenesis. doi:10.1111/jth.13551 JFW | T@lk 08:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angiogenesis
Talk:Batman (military)

message: Why is a Batman called a Batman? Jdavidb 18:06, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's French: "bât" means "pack" (as in saddle-pack), so a "Batman" is someone who looks after an officer's luggage ~ Mmartins 16:43, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: No. -- Necrothesp 14:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Any comments? Yes, no, revert? The section is currently uncited (though some items are reasonably self-sourcing), and WP:TRIVIA would seem to apply. - 2/0 (cont.) 06:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They're simply not important. The notion of "self-citing" may be sufficient for the articles about the characters mentioned, but that does not make them significant to the overall position of batman. There have no doubt been many people who have filled this position, and forcing a long fictional list distract from the focus of the article. Mintrick (talk) 13:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: How does this entry not start with a disambiguation notice? I would add one myself, but I don't know how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.113 (talk) 00:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Should probably have disambiguation notice

message: In the US Army, aides can be either officers or enlisted, although officers are by far more commonly seen. The enlisted aide program was alive and well in 2017. Get more info at https://www.army.mil/article/192259/enlisted_aide_program_offers_career_broadening_experience_for_ncos 
When I was attached to the German Army as a young officer in the early 1980s, a German soldier was assigned to sign for my bedding, arrange my accommodations, and clean my rifle and field gear. I objected to the latter, but ended up having to do it because I didn't have time to do it myself. The also had an orderly in a white jacket in the dining facility to bring us food and clear away the dishes. CsikosLo (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Enlisted Aides
Talk:Batman (unit)

message: For real? I doubt it - can we check this? Mark Richards 19:03, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: At least one webpage confirms that . Andris 19:54, May 7, 2004 (UTC)
Then I beg the humble pardon of the person who wrote this! Mark Richards 21:42, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: For real?

message: Is the huge batman claimed to be a unit of mass equal to 1000 pots or poods actually a case of confusion with some different unit of volume called a pot (with that pot of volume likely having a mass of much less than 16 kg for anything less dense than mercury?  Gene Nygaard 13:15, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't care how many pood are equal to one Batman... I'm just happy that the relationship exists.Salvar (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible confusion?

message: The Oxford English Dictionary (2d ed., 1989) defines the batman as "An oriental weight varying greatly in value according to the locality.", not specific to one or two areas as currently in the article. Its quotations have the following values:
*Babylon, 1599: 7 pound and 5 ounces English waight
*Unknown (in Samuel Purchas, Pilgrimages...), 1616: fiue and fiftie pound weight English
*Khiva, 1740: the great batman, equal to eighteen lb. russian, and the lesser batman, nine and a quarter.
*Constantinople, 1852: 6 okes [i.e. about 16 lbs.] = 1 batman.
—Centrx→talk • 04:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple meanings, or the various values of the measure
Talk:Seven Laws of Noah

message: I find it very strang that the hebrew and english versions of this page give a  differnet set of laws.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.111.13.200 (talk) 03:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you clarify which differences you find particularly important to address? JFW | T@lk 17:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hebrew and english versions

message: The article says that people are not "obligated" to convert to Judaism. This is pretty much a contortion of facts, as Judaism does not only not "obligate" people to convert, but rather by and large even discourages conversion, except for a very small sect of "messianic Jews" who try to prosetylize, and who are not recognized as proper Jews.
2A02:C7C:399B:9700:77F6:96ED:55D3:23BB (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Conversion to Judaism

message: The article jumps back and forth between "noahide" and "noachide".  If these mean different things could the article please elaborate?  If they don't, could the article please standardize on one or the other so as to avoid the implication that they mean different things?  Vaughan Pratt (talk) 08:10, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noahide or Noachide? 

message: To add to this article: a mention, in the article's text, of the Ten Commandments, and an explanation of how they relate to the Seven Laws of Noah. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Do they? Relate, I mean. Debresser (talk) 01:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a source saying that the 10 commandments, excluding Shabbat, are the same as the 7. I don't know exactly what to do with this source though, except to put it in the lead, which seems excessive, given the relative unimportance of this connection and the lack of authoritativeness of the source. Ar2332 (talk) 19:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Even in the article itself the claim is made hesitantly. Not convincing. Nor would I consider it much of a reliable source. I'd just leave it out. Debresser (talk) 22:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: In Punishment there is nothing in the RS that refers to this claim   In practice, Jewish law makes it very difficult to apply the death penalty.  It seems to be OR, and needs other sources.Pngeditor (talk)# Pngeditor (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punishment 

message: Does anyone know if the Karaic jews view the 7 laws in the same way as the rabbinical (Thanaic) jews? 46.117.125.199 (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karaic Jews
Talk:2004 in games

message: Format should be like 2004 in video gaming where there's a nice archive of all the year-specific game articles. WinterSpw (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format should be like [[2004 in video gaming]]? 

message: The following are not board games and should instead be included with 2004 in video gaming (which they all already are)
GTA San Andreas
Need for Speed Underground 2
Half-Life 2
Unless there are board game versions of these games which I am not aware of and their respective wikipedia pages don't seem to mention, it is inaccurate to mention them in this list.  
TomH42 (talk) 08:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove video games from list
Talk:Pervez Musharraf

message: Change the tenses in the article to indicate the subject is now dead. 69.127.153.207 (talk) 07:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In progress. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2023 

message: This article has been nominated to be linked on the main page under the section "In the News." Interested editors are invited to discuss the nomination here. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for the main page 

message: In the early life section, please remove the part where it says his great grandfather migrated from Piranshahr as there is no source backing this up and the source given does not mention this. 2600:100C:A21B:9ED1:482E:A9D4:615A:7D8F (talk) 08:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the "failed verification" template was added to this claim by another user. I think that is sufficient action for now, let's see if someone has a better source. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 22:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request 

message: His citizenship was india before Aug 14 1947 , he has never held British citizenship in his life 76.183.209.16 (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 20:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

text: He was a British subject, not a British citizen, before 1947. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. Do you have a reliable source for this? Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what the article already states. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyways, it looks like this has . Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2023 

message: The verdict of the LHC annulling the death sentence has been overturned and the original sentence has been upheld. The verdict section of the judicial hearings heading should be revised
Source:
SC upholds ex-military dictator Musharraf’s death sentence in treason case - Pakistan - DAWN.COM Abracadaba123 (talk) 15:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request: 10th January 2024 

message: How did jeneral pervez Musharraf overturn elected government in pakistan 103.200.86.231 (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics questions
Talk:The Great Kat

message: I have confirmed via a spirited telephone call by her that the text of the biography submitted here was submitted by The Great Kat herself, and is not a copyright infringer.  
She was upset by what she took to be an accusation by us that The Great Kat herself was a copyright infringer, which is of course not true, and which of course no one here ever said or even implied.
Great Kat, let me repeat that the actions taken by Moncrief were not in any way suggestive that you personally are a copyright infringer.  As we had no way of knowing that you were submitting your own biography, he acted solely to protect your rights.  He listed the _page_ on a list of potential copyright problems, he did not say or even imply that the Great Kat is a copyright infringer.
Jimbo Wales 22:15, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Using her own web site, an interview with her, or a Wordpress blog is not acceptable citations for proving she went to Juillard. All references from Juillard.edu in search have been found to be dead ends when actually reading that page. Find something concrete. Perhaps something actually from Juillard??  This does not seem to be a NPOV article as it stands. 67.253.99.254 (talk) NachtEngel DieUberMensch (talk)
:I'll look for sourcing better to your liking.
:In the meantime, this is not acceptable. It is unsourced and, essentially, claims that she is lying, a BLP problem. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:25, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now sourced it to SPIN Magazine. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

text: You may protest, but SPIN is a reliable source. Incidentally, the article does not merely quote her, it directly states that she graduated from Juilliard. Whatever you "hear" from Juillard[sic] is not verifiable. If you are uncomfortable with the source, you will need to take it to the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Juillard
Talk:Desperado (Eagles album)

message: Change identification of Eagles band members in cover art of Desperado album, to L-R Don Henley, Glenn Frey, Randy Meisner, Bernie Leadon 2600:100C:B2F2:F7FB:3C5E:8C8:4241:A10E (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . It's album cover art, not a band bio. WWGB (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2023