lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boy's Life (novel)

message: This Article is not very well laid out, gives an extremely brief introduction and goes right into the synopsis of the book with creating a sub section. I have not read the book myself so I do not know any background to it etc, but it is of low standard and should be edited by someone capable of doing so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MLRojas (talk • contribs) 01:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't List of Boy's Life Characters be merged here? Fyddlestix (talk) 00:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Source article has been redirected here so this is probably moot now. Fyddlestix (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Aluminium bromide

message: Is that correct? Isnt it just AlBr3? ChristianBxx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian75 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well the article should be renamed but only folks with special powers can do that.  Getting back to the chemistry, in principle, multiple compounds have the generic name "aluminium bromide" but you're right that 99.99% of the time people mean AlBr3.  Significant recent research has focused on species with the formula AlBr and AlB2, kinda surprising.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AlBr<sub>x</sub>
Talk:Aluminium nitrate

message: what's that first reference about? its not a reference at all it's a work sheet...
wouldn leave that one there - if someone feels responsible please delete it.
lg phil--132.230.20.105 (talk) 10:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st reference

message: It says in the previous step to have an excess of nitric acid. However, some concentrations of nitric acid react with alcohols. What concentrations of nitric are safe with which alcohols? What concentrations are unsafe? How are they unsafe?
What are some inorganics incompatible with aluminum nitrate? I assume methanol and butanol are compatible but what about other alcohols or functional groups?
Thanks for any help in advance. 146.6.145.8 21:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintended Reactions During Synthesis 

message: mixing those alcohols in that wt% doesn't do what that paragraphs says. I will delete that paragraph in few days to a week unless convinced otherwise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.79.200.162 (talk) 21:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis doesn't work 

message: Pure Al nitrate was not yet found in the nature, but "impure" ones are known: sveite and lislkirchnerite. www.mindat.org = the reference. Eudialytos (talk) 00:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature
Talk:Aluminium phosphide

message: Can I have any useful information about safely washing out A. Phosphide from the rice? Thank you. ahj6@hotmail.com 2010-03-09 22-12-08 Seoul  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyungjin Ahn (talk • contribs) 13:12, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello everyone
Could somebody provide a reference for the density of Aluminium Phosphide?
I found two references that state a different value 
Caveney, R. J.: Philos. Mag. 17 (1968) 943.  
states a density of 2.4 g/cm^3
Wang, C. C., Zaheeruddin, M., Spinar, L. H.: J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 25 (1961) 326.  
states a density of 2.4 g/cm^3 
and a density of 2.36 g/cm^3   (these a from two different measurement methods the last one is from x-ray data in powderer)
 
Kind regards,
Jeroen  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.180.83.252 (talk) 08:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the density?  

message: The SDS site linked in the sidebar is no longer maintained, and informs readers to look to manufacturer websites. An alternative site may be needed if it exists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.120.16.139 (talk) 05:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDS site no longer maintained
Talk:Aluminium sulfide

message: It's using the british spelling for aluminium and then the US version of sulfide, then says the british version is Aluminum Sulphide, making the same mistake in reverse.
British = Aluminium Sulphide
US = Aluminum Sulfide  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.92.39 (talk) 14:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And .. IUPAC is Aluminium sulfide, which is why this compound has a mixed name.  But you're right, the UK British spelling needs to be adapted.  --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First line is wonky
Talk:Aluminium gallium nitride

message: Since in LEDs it can produce a range of wavelengths it seems likely to be a variable composition alloy/mix like Aluminium gallium arsenide. Could be clearer and with better sources. - Rod57 (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: says it is variable composition. eg "AlxGa1-xN bandgap can be tailored from 4.3eV (xAl=0) to 6.2eV (xAl=1)" - Rod57 (talk) 13:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this one or a range of compositions
Talk:National Youth Agency

message: what role does the national youth agency play in youth work?
It helps Boy George  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.128.62.93 (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I've added a few wikilinks, but I don't think that job is done yet.  My link to Fear of youth is a bit dubious, but was the best I could find in Index_of_youth_articles although someone else might be able to find better.Dolive21 (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What I've done
Talk:Amantadine

message: The Polish wikipedia have large section about this. For example in Morfine article is the large section about "Non-medical use" , so I don't understand why there cannot be seciont "Non-official use". In Poland there is a hot topic - even members of parliament recomends using Amandantine for treatment (but not govmt itself).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkan997 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See the previous section. There has to be hard evidence from clinical trials, not people recommending it (be they members of parliament or whoever), for amantadine to be a serious option for COVID treatment.  --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 15:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added information about the drug, there's no evidence it works for COVID, and I've written just that. I've split information into the scientific background (the studies, metanalysis and a terminated clinical trial) and the phenomenon that surrounds the drug, similar to the more known cases of HCQ and ivermectin. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of information about Amantandine used for treating COVID 

message: Good morning,
I know the Wikipedia Editors as a class really dislike it when people "assign" things to them on the talk page.  I'm going to do it anyway.  Why?  B/c I have in no way, shape, or form the necessary knowledge.  I came here to gain it.
Amantadine is also prescribed off-label for patients with autism.  The studies for this were first published in 2001.  However, I came to wikipedia looking for a less "studies in the journal" explanation in how that was supposed to work, only to not find it listed.  Insurance pays for it, which means it's approved to some extent.  
I found these and can't understand them
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/cap.2016.0042
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565716/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11392343/ 
https://www.jwatch.org/jp200106060000003/2001/06/06/new-angle-treatment-autism  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.98.30.109 (talk) 12:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's real, I know someone who was prescribed this drug off label, but Wikipedia typically doesn't cover this unless it gets noticed in WP:MEDRS sources. It seems like there's just one study in autistic children which is probably not enough to firmly conclude it has therapeutic value. (t · c) buidhe 09:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 4 papers, ones a review. At least two studies. Papers go back to 2001. 2600:1700:F90:6950:FC8E:206C:7618:A865 (talk) 23:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

text: I see no problem to mention that amantadine is being investigated for use in treating neuropsychiatric disorders, with references, but not much beyond that. Clinicians continuously keep experimenting with new therapeutic methods and report results in academic journals; however, this is not a proof of efficacy or a widely accepted use. — kashmīrī TALK 10:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Autism?
Talk:Ammonia borane

message: "It is more hydrogen-dense than liquid hydrogen???" Can someone explain this to me? Liquid H2 is all H2 isn't it? Seems I see some B and N2 in ammonia borane.
Bachetta (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Category:Inorganic compounds and :Category:Amines? Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  dissonance 

message: The CAS number is correct (as you can see if you make a quick search in Sigma-Aldrich) but I do not know why this article says that is not verify. Sorry for my english. --Erik Mora (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAS Number
Talk:Ammonium acetate

message: The  text states that Ammonium acetate is volatile at low pressures (temperatures?), but the info box does not give a boiling point, stating that it decomposes. Presumably what is meant is that ammonium acetate decomposes (into acetamide and water) which are volatile?  It is also not clear to me if this volatility refers to its properties in aqueous solution, or the pure substance.  I think a bit of expert help would  be useful here to add clarity.
The volatility of ammonium acetate is due to equilibrium between the salt and the more volatile ammonia/acetic acid. So, you can remove ammonium acetate from samples at low pressures/temperatures (far lower than those needed to convert it to acetamide and water). At atmospheric pressure, I'm guessing the temperatures required to drive off the ammonia/acetic acid are much higher than what is required for the decomposition reaction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F140:400:1:A00F:8842:BA3B:C077 (talk) 22:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Volatility

message: This is wrong, I think. No GHS piktogramm, no GHS numbers.
192.108.70.26 (talk) 16:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hazards

message: I've removed the value given for the boiling point (117°C) as I'm unable to find any reference for it in Scifinder (or anywhere else). Its so close to the melting point that it just seems wrong. --Project Osprey (talk) 15:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boiling point
Talk:Ammonium bromide

message: Melting points and boiling points don't make any sense. Melting point should be lower than boiling point, but it is not. (Cmmarslender (talk) 19:58, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this page, the sublimation point is 394 C http://chemister.ru/Database/properties-en.php?dbid=1&id=355 A5 (talk) 20:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any contradiction?
Talk:Ammonium ferric citrate

message: What is the formula for this compound!!!
-Nham.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.42.151 (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Formula

message: http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/3462 says "The primary hazard is the threat to the environment. Immediate steps should be taken to limit its spread to the environment." What exactly is the hazard and how may it be neutralized?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.194.181 (talk) 20:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hazard

message: Does anyone know the usual proportions of Fe3+ to NH4+ in this compound?
Alecjw (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proportions... 

message: http://www.usp.org/fcc/2009-06-19_Revisions_to_FCC_2S.html
--222.64.25.162 (talk) 23:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   A red link is created based on the info of..... 

message: http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/jneu/abstract.00005064-200403050-00016.htm;jsessionid=KswX4LJrrLyN82kmqzySpvs58ZHn5WbCW1HLdDsn3xfbXyjDHTqQ!1032775582!181195628!8091!-1
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2791724
BTW, could anyone who knows the Journal of Neurochemistry please provide the ISSN and eISSN number, because I'm having difficulties to find them at
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jnc_enhanced/subs.asp
--222.64.25.162 (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infor of the toxicity .... 

message: This revision is based, primarily, on the availability of a crystal structure. Reference to the US patent has been removed as it obviously described impure samples. The patent states that the brown form contains iron oxide.
The chem box will need some attention as I have not been able to verify that the citations it contains refer to the title compound and not the impure substance of the patent. Petergans (talk) 11:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision 

message: I looked at some of the 3 citations and couldn't find anything that supported the claim that it is significantly more soluble in water than ferric citrate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.193.28.44 (talk) 15:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any citations for the solubility claim?  

message: The structure diagram shows the protonated form of citrate (C6H5O7), while for this salt, the citrate is in a deprotonated form (C6H4O7) as correctly stated in the article text. It would be more accurate if someone could change the image to show the deprotonated form of citrate as opposed to the protonated form. Mingusaum (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical structure picture is misleading
Talk:Ammonium nitrite

message: The image doesn't appear to show ammonium nitrite, but looks more like .—Tetracube (talk) 23:33, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image is wrong 

message: Preparation describes the crystals as colorless but the summary box states pale yellow.
69.72.92.31 (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance
Talk:Ammonium tetrathiomolybdate

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :MoS4 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27#MoS4 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "MoS4" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Aniline Yellow

message: There's no source for the claim that anline yellow causes cancer - so I deleted it. 
Also all the tirade about "toxic oyl sindrome" is irrelevant garbage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.193.199.8 (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:4-Anisaldehyde

message: Would recommend linking p-anisaldehyde to this page or even renaming it to that since that is the chemical shown.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.143.166 (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChemNerd (talk • contribs) 18:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: p-anisaldehyde

message: Since the preferred IUPAC name is 4-Methoxybenzaldehyde, shouldn't that be the article name? Then 4-Anisaldehyde would link to 4-Methoxybenzaldehyde instead of the other way around. Kenyoni (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is the more common name? Wikipedia:Naming conventions (chemistry) (in keeping with Wikipedia:Article titles) does not specify giving preference to IUPAC (or in general formal less-commonly-used). DMacks (talk) 12:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Good loan

message: Good loan is the name used to describe an "interest-free" loan in the Arabic language. Its importance comes from the fact that it is mentioned in the Holy Quran, therefore it is used by more than one billion Arabs and Muslims all over the world. It is a major economical form of Islamic banking.
:I've removed the speedy tag and PROD'd this instead.  I would be willing to drop the proposed deletion if in the next 5 days someone could write a coherent article at Qard el Hassan in which case this article could be redirected there.  Right now there isn't enough content, context, or sourcing here to really justify this article.--Isotope23 21:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anthranilic acid

message: The molecule consists of a substituted benzene ring, hence is classed as aromatic, with two adjacent, or "ortho-" functional groups, acarboxylic acid and an amine. What if they arent adjacent? What is it called then? Just granpa (talk) 11:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhere around an article describes the nomenclature: the 1,2-derivatives are called ortho- or o-, 1,3-derivatives are called meta- or m-, and 1,4-derivatives are called para- or p-.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  nonadjacent 

message: Could mention : Researchers Identify Metabolite That Could Signal a Higher Risk of Developing Dementia and Alzheimer’s ? Says "anthranilic acid is known to be involved in glutamate excitotoxicity, a process in which glutamate damages neurons by promoting their excessive and unregulated activity." - Rod57 (talk) 13:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. just a primary source. so, so many "potential biomarkers" of AD have been published. Jytdog (talk) 14:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible biomarker for dementia risk
Talk:Antimony pentafluoride

message: The article correctly describes the known structure of the solid as [SbF4(μ-F)]4, and the liquid as [SbF4(μ-F)]n, both with octahedral Sb.  But the image is the gas phase trigonal bipyramidal structure.  Why not a representation of the actual condensed-phase structures, not something the compound doesn't form until you heat to 150°C?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.4.67.186 (talk) 18:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a structure image displaying the gas phase structure, not the solid/liquid? 

message: Isnt H-He the strongest known acid? I know that SbF6H is really very steong but the strongest? RaftaReads (talk) 20:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, H-U100+ is stronger.  Who gives a hoot?  Most of our efforts are focused on practical, put-it-in-a-reaction acids.  HF/SbF6 is pretty far up there, so is oleum, Etc.  --Smokefoot (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  SbF6H
Talk:Alain Desrosières

message: The French version of this article is much more detailed, and includes some information which has been removed (looks like vandalism). I will update some of this, as I am familiar with the work, which was very significant, for example reviewed in translation in the LRB. Other contributions to this would be welcome, or any pointers on how reliable to regard articles from other language versions of wikipedia.
Ca3tki (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Article
Talk:Antimony trichloride

message: In the subhead "Structure",  I found the following confusing  "In SbCl3 each Sb has three Cl atoms at 234 pm showing the persistence of the molecular SbCl3 unit, however there are a further five neighboring Cl atoms, two at 346 pm, one at 361 pm, and two at 374 pm. These eight atoms..."  SbCl3 has 3 Cl; SbCl5 has 5, whatever has 8 is something else... 
98.109.7.192 (talk) 01:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Antimony trifluoride

message: *Frederic Swarts ( 1866-1940). Timmermans, Jean. 1961, 38, 423. 316. j Chem Edu 
*Midgley, T. & Henne, A. L. 1930 Organic fluorides as refrigerants. Ind. Engng Chem. 22, 542- 545
*Swarts, Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg., 1892, 24, 309
*Swarts, F. , Bull. Acad. Roy. Med. Belg., 31, 675 (1896).
*
--Stone (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Antonin Gadal

message: WikiProject France Assessment
This article was listed on WikiProject France under articles needing assessment.  This article has been rated start-class because:
*It is informative, and some sections show adequate research. However, there are only two references listed which is not sufficient for an article of this length.
*Perhaps an image could be added?
Lazulilasher (talk) 18:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject France Assessment 
Talk:Apigenin

message: http://www.chron.com/news/health/article/Vegetables-with-apigenin-are-key-cancer-fighters-4738722.php
Apigenin:
"In addition to parsley, celery and artichokes, you'll find it in apples, cherries, grapes, chamomile tea and wine, and in herbs such as tarragon, cilantro, licorice, spearmint, basil and oregano".
Please, try to find out how MUCH apigenin these contain. Do you get optimal amount from wine and apples, for example? Can you get too much?
ee1518 (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: More dietary sources

message: * Patel, D. et al. “Apigenin and cancer chemoprevention: progress, potential and promise (review)”, International Journal of Oncology (2007),30(1):233-245.
* Shukla, S. / Gupta, S. “Apigenin: a promising molecule for cancer prevention”, Pharmaceutical Research (2010),27(6):962-978.
Thank you (you forgot your signature) for your opinion and suggestion.
These reviews are meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject.
The reviews are placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” (WP:FURTHER).
The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” (WP:MEDRS) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”
The reviews in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, they are scholarly and peer-reviewed, and they are published in academic journals. Granateple (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential references

message: The last two structures in the synthesis path look the same to me.  Keith Henson (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article error?
Talk:Apocarotenal

message: The SMILES on Wikipedia gives:
(2E,4E,6Z,8E,10E,12E,14E,16E)-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-17-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-en-1-yl)heptadeca-2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16-octaenal
The real SMILES is CC=1CCCC(C)(C)C=1/C=CC(\C)=C\C=C\C(\C)=C\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)C=O
I have replaced it--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 01:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES error 
Talk:Apomorphine

message: I think that the chemical structure image is an optical isomer of apomorphine. Not a chemist though, could do with being looked at maybe. Apomorphine as opposed to 4H-dibenzo[de,g]quinoline-10,1​1-diol, 5,6,6a,7-tetrahydro-6-​methyl-, (6aS)-  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.99.232 (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Louis Robert (historian)

message: This stub does very little justice to undoubtedly the greatest epigraphist of the 20th century. It seems rather unfitting that a man who changed the face of ancient history should have so perfunctory an entry. There is an excellent summary of his career in Bulletin Epigraphique (1987) p.1 which could provide the basis of the article, as well as judicious remarks on his strengths and weaknesses by John Ma in Classical Review 59 (2009) pp.205-8.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.116.170 (talk) 22:08, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition to incorporating Ma's excellent piece, it may be worth translating much that is on the French page for Robert, which is a full and well-documented account of his life. Ajcee7 (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy 
Talk:Arbutin

message: Units?
69.72.92.136 (talk) 07:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  boiling point 