lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hélène Dutrieu

message: de: has a picture under . --DaB. 22:58, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In the article there is a sentence under the section "First world war": Général Février put her in charge of the ambulances at Messimi Hospital. If the person mentioned is the French general Victor Février, he died in 1908 and couldn't possibly put her in charge of anything. Can somebody confirm who this General Février was? Viktorhauk (talk) 07:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference is probably from this website, although that may not be the source article. General Février had something to do with the French military healthcare system. He is partially responsible for helping the American Field Services relocating to the building of the Lycee Pasteur, which had been appropriated by the French Military in the mobilisation for World War I. It became known as the American Ambulance Section of Paris. This is probably the section that she was in charge of. As a matter of interest, this quote (from Samuel N. Watson; Those Paris Years; 1936; Book II, Chapter 12): "The word ambulance in French has as its primary meaning a military hospital, a mobile unit of hospitalisation which follows the army; and from that came the secondary use of the word as meaning any military hospital, as also the vehicles used for the transport of the wounded." Ambulance in this sense probably means mobile as in Mobile Army Surgical Hospital. Where Messimi comes from, I have no idea. There are of course the Messimy hospitals, but they are located near Lyon, which does not fit with the story. The history of "The American Ambulance" is older. It was initially a volunteer service set up in the Franco-Prussian War. If you want to know what that looked like, have a look at this picture. JHvW 16:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to general Février? 
Talk:Auto independence

message: Dorothy Firstly welcome to wikipedia. I'm sure you will love it here. This article needs a lot of work to get it into shape. It reads as if it is all your own idea. If that is true then, we can't keep it. We don't allow original research here. If however this is someone elses idea, and you are just describing it then that's fine. But you do need to say who came up with it. Theresa Knott  (a tenth stroke) 23:05, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comments
Talk:Negative temperature

message: Had to laugh. Several comments were made as to the non-existence or bee-ess-ness of this topic. I suppose it would appear a bit hard to understand to the non-physics majors amongst us (myself included). However, after reading a couple articles it is apparent that it does indeed exist but probably only in that lofty realm of quantum physics (where all bets are off for the time being). Perhaps it will be the basis of transporter devices of the future! LOL Anyhow, a few links for those pondering edits to this and related articles:
E. T. Janes' 1964 paper, Boltzmann vs. Gibbs Entropies, published in American Journal of Physics in 1965.
What is the conceptual difference between Gibbs and Boltzmann entropies? 
Gibbs Entropy, Negative Energy - discussion on Physics Forum 
The Thomas Oikonomou -- the Physicist not the Greek actor -- paper on Clausius vs. Boltzmann-Gibbs Entropies. 
— Preceding unsigned comment added by  JimScott (talk • contribs) 21:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I do exist. I do, I do, I do! 

message: I can't understand this sentence at all:
> Confined point vortices are a system with bounded phase space as their canonical momenta are not independent degrees of freedom from their canonical position coordinates
StainlessSteelScorpion (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please revise grammar 

message: Are these systems even in thermodynamic equilibrium? It sounds like from the descriptions that most of these will spontaneously exchange energy with additional degrees of freedom that are not being considered but will (always?) have some finite positive temperature. Is this truly a meaningful definition of temperature, or is it akin to saying v can exceed c because KE=1/2 mv^2 by disregarding the domain over which our equations are valid? And can these negative temperature values be used in a meaningful way in other thermodynamic calculations?150.203.179.56 (talk) 04:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermodynamic equilibrum 

message: "Science News" February 9, 2013, Page 10. "Hottest temp is as negative one: New record reached with ultracold gas at high temperature" by Andrew Grant. (It's in the "In the News section".)  RJFJR (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: found the online link RJFJR (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is broken. 2600:1702:1DE0:8FB0:109D:7D7:8939:A1C5 (talk) 18:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article
Talk:Pink Flag

message: the cover section should include big black's version of heartbeat
:There's no song called Heartbeat in Pink Flag... Xic667 (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: wow. facepalm.Thakmere (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

message: The article currently states in the infobox that this album was recorded in autumn 1977, which is probably correct (though unreferenced). However, I remember around 1980 that there were persistent rumours that it had been recorded in 1976, predating the British punk explosion. The story was that the men in suits found it incomprehensible and delayed the release. This may be an urban myth, but a mention of it and a confirmation/refutation would improve the article. In any case, more info on the recording history would be welcome. --Ef80 (talk) 20:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording date 
Talk:Siegfried (Soulcalibur)

message: There has been a point in the Trivia added more than once about what happens to Nightmare in Siegfriend's Ending if the players input the code. Now, this point in the trivia it's not only wrong (It's state that Nightmare will be striked by a lighting bolt if the players input the code, when that really happens if the player does NOT input the code)
And the analisys are only speculation, wondering what happened to Nightmare after that, when first: We don't know if Siegfried's Ending is Canon or not (His battle against Nightmare probably is, but that's appart from the endings), and if anyone analyzes that ending, it's easy to deduce that those 3 Nightmare were an hallucination caused by Soul Edge, like the fact that Siegfried saw his hand as Nightmare's just before he appeared, and the fact that, whenever the Nightmares are beated by the Thunder or by Siegfried's attack, they just dissapear leaving nothing and it's the white covering the screen is like it's meaning that the hallucination is over. Nightmare probably wasn't even there, and if he really was, what happened to him is left in shadows, and we'll hardly know until Soul Calibur 4.
Because of all this, the mentioned point in the Trivia is practically ridiculous, I'm deleting it, and please, don't repost it anymore neither in Siegfried's or Nightmare's page. (Alexlayer 16:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Siegfried's Ending

message: Does anyone else think this page should be moved to Siegfried(Soul series) instead? I think so since the series is referred to as Soul series on the series' page.Leemorrison 17:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be moved to Siegfried Schtauffen, as with his full name, there's no comparation. --Alexlayer 17:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2007/227/939465_20070816_screen006.jpg
I added it to the article already, but I may need someone to fix it for me.  I'm not quite sure how to.Wingedregent 07:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmation of Soul Edge Phantom. 

message: I don't think it's a good idea to post a semi-translation of his SC4 bio.  I understand the need to explain his role in SC4, but there has to be a better way than a semi-translation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.198.53.76 (talk) 15:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not legible in the slightest. I'm usually good at reading what to some is illegible, but this? It's a mess. I'm getting rid of it. If anyone contests, feel free to re-add it, until then, it would make more sense to remove it in my opinion. Mahare 00:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SoulCalibur IV Translation 

message: Okay, this is pretty much just like the old character analysis section from before. I'm removing these for the same reason people from before deleted the character analysis section. If you want to find out why, check out Taki's and Kilik's talk pages. If people want a strategy guide, they should go to fansites. Mythmonster2 (talk) 06:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gameplay
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Boothy443

message: These outside views seem to be conveniently leaving out Boothy's replies to people about his opposition to their adminship. -- BRIAN0918  15:19, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

message: When I was first trying to understand Jason's anomalous behaviour and his refusal to explain, I examined his edit history up to the point of his wholesale opposition to all open RFAs.  I recorded my analysis. From this I was able to draw my own conclusion as to the basis of his behaviour. I did not record my conclusion. If anybody wishes to see this Microsoft Word document please email me with a promise that you will use it only as an aid to understanding and not as a stick with which to belabour Jason. Should I subsequently send you the document, that does not amount to a licence to distribute any part of the commentary. —Theo  (Talk) 22:26, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is Jason? -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 20:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One would assume that Jason is the subject in question, no... --Sn0wflake 21:32, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Jason is Boothy443. --Phroziac (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Analysis of edit history
Talk:David Jackson (Pennsylvania physician)

message: I usually include an external link to the congress website with these articles. The link would have been Congress bioguide. I didn't this time because of some confusing differences. The detail I used in the article conforms with Appleton's Biographies, the Dictionary of American Biography, and data from the University of Pennsylvania. This date (1747) makes more sense than 1730 in terms of other dated material. 
This isn't the first mistake I've found in the Congressional bioguide. I have let them know, and after research they may correct it. Even if they do, it takes 12 to 18 months. Lou I 23:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth details

message: I've never contributed to Wikipedia, so I am unsure how to proceed with an edit to change information that seems to be in error. The Genealogy of the Jackson Family  states that his father was Joseph, not Samuel. His Daughter of the American Revolution (DAR) record  states that he was married to Elizabeth Reed, not Jane Mathers, and he did not have a brother named Paul, (see my first link). He also does not appear to have been married to Susan Kemper, or have 9 children with her,though, his 1st wife did die young, I see no source that supports this. Also, his Find a Grave link (under the Wikipedia external link) supports this, too. Would someone please assist in correcting this and adding citations, please? It would be much appreciated.  Binx719 (talk) 10:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Incorrect Information
Talk:Livio Dante Porta

message: This article should be cleaned, expanded, and de-POVed.
Mistercow 22:11, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have begun to expand the article in consultation with people who knew the man. There's stlll a lot more to be done, but have felt justified in "destubbifying" it--John of Paris 15:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Detinue

message: Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think detinue is a "remedy" as described in the current article. My understanding is that it is an older tort not too different from conversion. I'l take some time to look it up later but if anyone knows off hand, let me know. Thanks. --PullUpYourSocks 23:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Changes seem to have been made by someone called Steve H. Fish, who does not appear to claim any knowledge of law, so I suspect the just plain wrong. Care to rewrite it? Francis Davey 20:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

text: I spent some time checking a few tort texts and honestly I have no idea where the current definition of detinue came from. Before I was willing to give some benefit of the doubt but I can't see any reason to now. Simply put, Detinue is the wrongful detention of goods. The rest of the stuff just doesn't make any sense. It needs a complete re-write.  --PullUpYourSocks 20:41, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

message: What's the relevance of the picture of the Elk? There's just the picture of the animal with the caption 'Modern Canadian law still recognizes detinue' under it. -Depor23 (talk) 10:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think the picture should be removed, the other images are also largely irrelevant. Eiad77 (talk) 04:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Elk image
Talk:Alternative worship

message: Hope all you hardcore postmodern emergents don't have a problem with me starting this article.  Please feel free to hash and rehash.  I don't pretend that this is anywhere near the tip of the iceberg on the subject of Alt/Worship I just felt that it deserved its own article and not a redirect to Emerging Church since the two don't really define each other. Have fun with it!  And God Bless!
--Icj tlc 17:08, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Needs rephrasing towards a proper tone. History of the movement, its relevence and its relations with the rest of the religious community should be discussed as well. Vassyana 10:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: More external references and in article citations are needed to meet Wikipedia standards. There are references provided, but no indication of how these references fit into the article (if at all). Vassyana 10:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No citations
Talk:Maximal consistent set

message: Isn't the following:
* The set is closed under a number of conditions internally modelling the T-schema:
**For example, for a set S\!: A \land B \in S iff A \in S \land B \in S,
**or, (\exists x. \phi(x)) \in S iff \exists t \in T. (\phi(t)) \in S), where T is the Herbrand universe of S.
a consequence of point 1 and 3?   Baarslag 00:10, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Lambaréné

message: The article mentions a "former" hospital, but it seems that the hospital is very much alive. 
http://www.schweitzerfellowship.org/features/lamb/ talks about physicians spending time there since the 1990s.
:I believe that there is a newer hospital, but the article discusses the former hospital, now a museum. Warofdreams 11:51, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Jurong Bird Park

message: I have a photo of the pelicans at the BirdPark and will upload it to the commons when the article gets a little longer, or if someone requests it. --Commander Keane 00:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

message: There was obviously an earlier version of the Bird Park.  When I visited Singapore in 1954, there was one walk-in aviary on the side of the hill, plus numerous large cages on the flat below. It was very impressive, even then. 00:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The logo added by User:Perumalism on 18 July 2013 is out of date and has been removed from the article. Firebrace (talk) 16:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo 

message: I can't see anything too technical?  Considering the dozens of medical pages we have here that are WAY over most people's heads, I can't imagine why somebody put that up here.
IceDragon64 (talk) 22:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too technical ? 

message: On 13 October 2021, it was indeed announced that a new name 'Bird Paradise' would be used. This was also announced with its counterparts for River Wonders. However, the new name for the bird park is not referring to the current one over in Jurong, and is actually referring to the future one in Mandai opening in 2022. Hence, I do not believe that this article be renamed just yet and should retain its former name that is currently in use. Sgwikicontributor (talk) 12:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong name for article
Talk:Thomas Chalmers

message: Couple of points could use clarification:
*"in seven years upwards of 300,000 had been contributed" -- I assume that's £300,000, but I'm not sure how to confirm.
*if would be nice to link "the Disruption" in "In 1841 the movement which ended in the Disruption was rapidly culminating".  I assume this is the disruption of the Church of Scotland in 1843, which a google search for "the Disruption" "Church of Scotland" finds many hits for (but which Wilipedia has as yet no article for).
*The quotation marks in "I have no veneration... but I have the utmost veneration for it qua an instrument of Christian good" were missing.  I've guessed where they belong, but this should be verified.
Steve Summit 00:56, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "Thomas Chalmers Scottish theologian and philosopher. Initiated in Lodge St. Vigean No. 101, Arbroath, Scotland April 26, 1800." (William R. Denslow, Harry S. Truman, 1957, William R. Denslow, Harry S. Truman: 10,000 Famous Freemasons from A to J, Part One. Kessinger Publishing, 1957, , S. 196)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.227.126.251 (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Freemason

message: you should use:http://www.newble.co.uk/chalmers/biography.html or http://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1701-1800/thomas-chalmers-and-the-scots-church-11630292.html or http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/131christians/pastorsandpreachers/chalmers.html or http://www.anstrutherburghcollection.org/?page_id=62 you're welcome.  (added by  on 8 October 2012 22:31)). Dougweller (talk) 04:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources (moved from article) 
Talk:Bình Tây Market

message: I'm assuming that this image is being used with permission. If not, it should be deleted, because it is copyrighted. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs, blog) 01:03, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission

message: What is the etymology of Bình Tây? Is it 平西? These characters are often used in place names. Badagnani (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:JetBlue

message: — Assignment last updated by Therealworldtopg (talk) 16:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change

message: JetBlue's participation in a codeshare with American is ending on 7/20/2023 per an email I received from JetBlue 2607:FB91:D1F:8A4A:AC39:9931:E32C:86BF (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Codeshare 

message: Hi, team. I noticed that this page was moved from "JetBlue" to "jetBlue".
From my understanding of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks, while we do use camel case in certain situations for letters in the middle of a trademarked name, we generally do not use it to for the first letter, which is still left capitalized. The only exception is for cases where only the second letter is capitalized (e.g., iPhone), which does not apply here. See MOS:TMLOWER.
Further, in both secondary sources (newspapers, etc.) and JetBlue's own Form 10-K, "JetBlue" is used with a capital J. I suggest moving the page back. Precision123 (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Strictly speaking, the page wasn't moved—article titles can't begin with a lowercase letter—but I agree with you and have removed  to restore the previous capitalization. Conifer (talk) 08:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of camel case in ''JetBlue'' 

message: I noticed that an edit changed the infobox from listing JetBlue's "focus cities" to listing its "operating bases." I am not stating an opinion about this but wanted to point it out for clarity. For the record, JetBlue refers to them as "focus cities." However, its classification of Los Angeles as such may now be shaky, given the recent route cuts there. Was there another reason for this edit that I am not aware of? Thank you. Precision123 (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Focus cities'' versus ''operating bases''
Talk:MSN Virtual Earth

message: Renaming article to MSN Virtual Earth is necessary or a separate article to reflect the difference between MSN Web-based feature and Microsoft Windows client software. -- 01:14, July 26, 2005 Djkinsella
: Do whatever that is required to better reflect the fact. By the way, where is the client software? I can't wait to try it. -- Toytoy 01:43, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
:I've updated the main page to "online service" instead of "Windows software". What indication do you have that there will be a client-based version of Virtual Earth? --J. J. 18:17, 2005 August 24 (UTC)
:: Sorry, misinformation, I guess. -- Toytoy 12:18, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
::: It seems to be renamed again: Windows Live Local (powered by Virtual Earth) Beta. It also now links to http://local.live.com/ --82.176.160.13 10:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming and forking
Talk:Fred Biletnikoff

message: Howdy!  If someone could at least mention his daughters murder.
http://www.biletnikoff.net/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.210.151 (talk) 15:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jerry Porter (American football)

message: The article describes Porter as "basically" the starting receiver in front of Jerry Rice.
Well, was he or not?
"Basically" is an hackneyed and extraneous term that does not add much to a coherent argument.
If you don't know what hackneyed or extraneous mean, you have no business using basically as an adverb.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.137.183.192 (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basically?
Talk:Tom Flores

message: I'm not keen on taking any sides in this issue, but I happen to have this article on my watchlist so I'm chiming in.  First thing - for those who aren't aware there is a 3-revert rule on Wikipedia, so please keep that in mind when reverting/undoing changes.  It seems that you all have good intentions so I'd hate to see people get blocked over this.  Second - a lot of people have claimed that sports writers/announcers are saying this or that regarding Flores, Dungy, and Ditka.  But the key is verifiability.  Essentially, if you want to make a claim either way, it will need to be backed up by a verifiable source (preferrably with a URL).  I would much rather see this issue worked out on this talk page rather than through a needless edit war.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 21:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Recent debate 

message: I found it here .  Should we put Thomas Raymond Flores on the first sentence?
--Chaohwa 19:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flores' Whole Name
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Collaboration of the Month

message: Music Muntnicola27 (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ECHOLIACTION & LACK OF COMMUNATION SKILLS 

message: Hi  After a brief discussion at WT:MED, we're going to try reviving this project for now. If folks are interested and participate, then we'll keep it going! If not, perhaps this return will be shortlived. Either way, I'm pinging you because you're listed as "Participants" in the project. The participants list is certainly no promise to engage, but I may occasionally ping the "active participants" list if there's discussion related to this project (or post on folks' talk pages). If you don't mind the odd notification, please do stay. If you'd prefer not to be notified, feel free to remove your username from the list, and I'll leave you be. I hope you're all staying well during these crazy times, and I hope I'll be seeing you around. Ajpolino (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it difficult to commit to major projects but I am certainly interested! JFW | T@lk 21:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MCOTM Returns! Any interest in being listed as a "participant"?