lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Humoral immunity

message: What, like plants fixing nitrogen, or me fixing the brakes on my car?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.14.118 (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fix" complement? 

message: I am new. I have a girlfriend who has a very low white blood cell count. I believe it is something like 3.7. I am trying to find out what information I might give her to help her. 
Could you please give me some direction that might help know what is wrong with her. She has seen two doctors and they don't know what the problem is. 
Sincerely, K.
:Errrk – Wikipedia is not qualified to give medical advice. Ask this question again on the SparkNotes' Health and Nutrition board and I'd be more than happy to solicit unqualified advice.--ZayZayEM 02:51, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am new. 

message: I suppose that this humoral immunity page would be better off if it's merged with B cell, Immunoglobulins and stuff like molecular interactions written into it also. --Calvinchong 04:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I suppose
Talk:Michelozzo

message: A web search shows the following counts:
* Michelozzo - 2,140
* Michelozzo Michelozzi - 167
* Michelozzo di Bartolomeo - 180
* Michelozzo di Bartolommeo - 146
so clearly the appropriate place for this article is under plain Michelozzo. In addition, numerous major reference books I have (e.g. "Palaces of Florence", which highlights his Palazzo Medici) refer to him only as "Michelozzo". Noel 02:55, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heroic fantasy

message: Sorry about the no-ID on adding the quotations section; I can't seem to stay logged in for more than a few minutes at a time tonight, and didn't notice that I had been logged off. — B.Bryant 03:37, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  (untitled) 

message: shouldnt this be tagged first as being fulil of POV and questionable contend? not just pov btw, overstated opinion with attempt at persuation.--Lygophile 14:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!  Goldfritha 00:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pov 

message: Fantasy was long distinguishable from mythological tales long before LOR.  In fact, it was distinguishable from them in the medieval romances, when it was not exactly fantasy.  Goldfritha 19:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: origins

message: Another five years have gone by, with no progress on this discussion. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of current Wikipedia practices and codes than I should just Be Bold. At the very least, Heroic fantasy should be merged with Sword and sorcery, as the opening quote on this article equates the two explicitly. Whateley23 (talk) 03:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still Discussing the Merge 

message: The lead section is making major negative generalizations about this genre. DemonDays64 (talk) 01:59, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view 

message: Such a story combines [sic] the color and dash of the historical costume romance with the atavistic supernatural thrills of the weird, occult, or ghost story.
This doesn't seem to be an error?  Usually "sic" follows an obvious error in grammar that was in the original, thus quoting it while acknowledging the error as an error.  But "Such a story combines the aspects of the historical romance with the aspects of the ghost story" seems to me to be a perfectly grammatical construction, and the expansion doesn't seem to introduce any problems, certainly not with the word "combines"; what am I missing? Kilyle (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I deleted it. Rray (talk) 13:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a "sic" in the quote? 

message: "Unlike dark fiction, it provides a setting in which 'all men are strong, all women beautiful, all life adventurous, and all problems simple'." This quote is very centric towards men, and it's misogynistic; women are not ornaments and any woman's appearance does not exist to serve men. if you get what i mean. I strongly suggest that it be changed 2600:4040:A034:A300:1119:F3A8:6BC9:D2FC (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  misogyny
Talk:Third-rate

message: Please do not remove the first paragraph as it functions as a quick navigational aid to the other articles in this series.  Thank you. Petersam 03:52, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph is navigational aid

message: It has become apparent that the words "first rate", "second rate", etc have become capitalised over the last year or so.  This seems to me to directly contradict the guidance at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), and I have changed them back again.  To clarify, if we were talking about frigates, we would use lower case, because it's not a proper noun; "first rate" is exactly analogous. The usage on :Category:Set indices on ships follows the lower case usage almost exclusively, as far as I can tell.  Please address any concerns here before making wholesale changes back again.
On another note, some of the hyphenation has been rather patchy.  Adjectival use will require a hyphen (first-rate ship) but when used as a noun (first rate), it does not.  Again, I've made the changes were I've spotted the need.  
Apologies if I've missed any or introduced any errors, since we all err from time to time. Shem (talk) 22:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation

message: It's a compound noun, right? Not a compound adjective. The hyphen needs to come out of the title (to match its absence in the main text). OR make it "Third-rate ship", or "Third-rate ship (British Navy)", if that pleases. We must be aware of the likely wrong meaning most readers will attach to "third-rate/third rate", too. I don't know how to get around that. Tony (talk)  08:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the hyphen?
Talk:Fourth-rate

message: Please do not remove the first paragraph as it functions as a quick navigational aid to the other articles in this series.  Thank you. Petersam 03:53, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph is navigational aid

message: I love the pun in the external links section.  So very Jack Aubrey...
:Heh, it didn't even occur to me when writing it, must have been subconscious prankster at work! Stan 04:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is indeed amusing. =) 152.23.196.162 07:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: puns

message: Really good article!  Well done to everyone who worked on it.   DangerousNerd  talk 00:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article! 

message: It has become apparent that the words "first rate", "second rate", etc have become capitalised over the last year or so.  This seems to me to directly contradict the guidance at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), and I have changed them back again.  To clarify, if we were talking about frigates, we would use lower case, because it's not a proper noun; "first rate" is exactly analogous. The usage on :Category:Set indices on ships follows the lower case usage almost exclusively, as far as I can tell.  Please address any concerns here before making wholesale changes back again.
On another note, some of the hyphenation has been rather patchy.  Adjectival use will require a hyphen (first-rate ship) but when used as a noun (first rate), it does not.  Again, I've made the changes were I've spotted the need.  
Apologies if I've missed any or introduced any errors, since we all err from time to time. Shem (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation 

message: In the easy navigation part at the end of the page, 4th rank ships are under the title "Ships of the line" even though they were not suitable to be one. By renaming the title "Frigates" to "Warships/Frigates", one could replace it over that section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.54.243.153 (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a ship of the line
Talk:Fifth-rate

message: Please do not remove the first paragraph as it functions as a quick navigational aid to the other articles in this series.  Thank you. Petersam 03:53, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not make a template to do that? Loganberry (Talk) 03:54, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: First paragraph is navigational aid

message: I replaced the image of the USS Essex with a contemporary picture of the HMS Trincomalee.
Unfortunately, while it is a higher resolution, it isn't a side view.  However the USN didn't use the same
rating system as the RN, so the illustration should be an RN vessel, not a USN vessel.
We have a second image of the HMS Trincomalee, :File:HMS Trincomalee.jpg.
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 02:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  add image 

message: It has become apparent that the words "first rate", "second rate", etc have become capitalised over the last year or so.  This seems to me to directly contradict the guidance at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), and I have changed them back again.  To clarify, if we were talking about frigates, we would use lower case, because it's not a proper noun; "first rate" is exactly analogous. The usage on :Category:Set indices on ships follows the lower case usage almost exclusively, as far as I can tell.  Please address any concerns here before making wholesale changes back again.
On another note, some of the hyphenation has been rather patchy. Adjectival use will require a hyphen (first-rate ship) but when used as a noun (first rate), it does not. Again, I've made the changes were I've spotted the need.  
Apologies if I've missed any or introduced any errors, since we all err from time to time. Shem (talk) 22:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like, with this reasoning (which I agree with), the article title should be "fifth rate", without a hyphen, as it's not adjectival; it's a noun. Ditto for the other five articles. Regardless, eight-plus years later, the hyphenation is still patchy in each of these articles, and I would personally prefer standardization and consistency of one or the other. 100.40.6.4 (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation
Talk:Toronto Stock Exchange

message: An article about the Toronto Stock Exchange is deficient if it doesn't have a single mention of the TSE. It was renamed from the TSE to the TSX only in 2001, which means that it was known as the TSE for more than 123 years. The history portion of this article should be written to acknowledge the TSE as the historical name that it was. I know nothing of stocks and markets so I won't make the changes myself, but I remember well the traditional name for this entity and emplore somebody to make the revisions. TimothyPilgrim 15:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the TSE? 

message: Is there a source for the sub-indices?  Is it useful to have that information here?24.81.98.134 20:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TSX Sub-Indices 

message: Are there any confirmed reports on the technology used in the TSX? I heard it was a custom application running on Linux and UNIX servers. Is this true?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.221.94.160 (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology Used 

message: Why does the article specifically mention the 1999 appointment of  Barbara G. Stymiest as president and CEO?  They've no doubt had many others in that job, and the article doesn't mention the others.  Is she the current president and CEO?  Is she more notable than the others for some other reason? 184.94.124.236 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that she is more notable because she was the first female president of any stock exchange in the world. I know that this is really late, but in case you're still on Wikipedia.... :)
DoggieTimesTwo 04:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd emphasis 

message: WP has no article on YBM Magnex International Inc, yet this TSX fraud must be great interest given the prior issues with other Canadian exchanges.
G. Robert Shiplett 14:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  YBM Magnex International Inc 

message: I'll be maintaining the list of companies with the following standards:
* Only one share class per issuer (so the banks with many preferred shares are only listed once).  The symbol listed is the primary symbol.
* No ETFs
* No structured financial/investment companies (e.g. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment Company Limited)
The idea is that each entry could have an unique Wikipedia article, even if it doesn't yet have one. -Mparrault (talk) 16:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Standards 

message: Updated TSX as the 10th largest stock exchange by market cap, as is mentioned in this Wikipedia article.
One of the sources in that article being  "[|Top 10 Stock Exchanges in the World 2023]". Edu Dwar. 14 August 2023. Retrieved 2023-08-14. CraftierBark8 (talk) 07:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated TSX place to 10th largest
Talk:Bahrain

message: This article and the main article on demography show the huge excess of adult men in Bahrain, but say nothing about this in words. Are the non-citizens, the temporary residents all male? In the ages below 20, the gender split is as one might expect, more less evenly split. Then above 20, there is an excess of men. I do not know the nation, and cannot find any commentary on this imbalance. - - Prairieplant (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The main reason appears to be foreign workers. Page 7 of this demographic report provides detail. Feel free to include this source in the relevant articles and add further context for readers about the gender disparity. Hope this helps. Best, Left guide (talk) 12:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  So many men 

message: I request that the page could be semi-protected due to vandalism. Ebraali444 (talk) 07:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request (31/8/23) 

message: Seems to be a highly contested topic as to what % is Sunni vs Shia. The State Department says "Most estimates from NGOs and the Shia community state Shia Muslims represent a majority (55 to 70 percent) of the citizen population.", but the infobox seems to say 51% Sunni/49% Shia, and they don't publish official stats on the breakdown in their census. Is there any way to indicate that this % is uncertain or contested? 205.175.106.234 (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakdown of Sunni/Shia 

message: In the article, Jewish population is shown as 0.002% of the total population of 1.5 million. That means 30 Jews live in Bahrain. Is it correct data? I think we should remove this data from Article as the Jewish population is not substantial. 103.61.109.73 (talk) 06:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish Population  

message: The map used in the sidebar has a strange inset. The world map has a rectangle that covers an area from Egypt to India. But the larger map is only a fraction of this. Not accurate or helpful. I realize it's difficult for a country this small. 2401:7000:DB0D:3900:58C:C232:8442:549F (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map inset is incorrect
Talk:Battle of Wakefield

message: Is it accurate that Margaret moved north?  I had thought that the Yorkists controlled the south at this point, and that Margaret would have been moving south to confront the Yorkists, who at this point controlled the King. john k 05:52, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The gate at Sandal Castle faced North East, and due to the orientation of the batle field, the gate faced directly towards the Lancastrian force located to 'the north' of Sandal Castle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philip266665 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: -but mildly MASSIVE!!! Does there need to be so much background? Good work though. Basket Feudalist  18:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article!!! 
Talk:The Half-Gallon Quarter-Acre Pavlova Paradise

message: The page New Zealand dream is currently being considered for deletion rather than modification. Those wishing deletion generally oppose the whole concept of a New Zealand dream, and also the Australian dream. Please pass your judgment about whether you favor full deletion or modification. Unfortunately they may also seek to delete the Australian dream. Badenoch 07:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crows Nest, New South Wales

message: I cannot believe that CN was named AFTER the pub. Surely after the CN estate. Thortful 06:20, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That article is a poor one, and I don't think adding similar businesses to this article will enhance it.  --Inas66 (talk) 04:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Indentured servitude

message: It would be great if the article could explain the origin of the word "indenture" and how it changed its meaning from "toothed". Thank you. Maikel (talk) 08:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Maikel - It's due to the toothed edge where an indenture is torn into two (one piece for each party) - It's noted in the linked page Indenture#Historical_usage - Gilgamesh4 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: I'm drafting a section on indentured farm labour in the UK, but I wonder if there was also indentured servitude elsewhere in Europe?  Any inputs would be appreciated, either on the UK section or on Europe more widely - Thanks -
Gilgamesh4 (talk) 16:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indentured servitude in the United Kingdom (and maybe more widely in Europe?) 

message: In the U.S... the 13th Amendment carves out a special provision for slavery and involuntary servitude. Rklawton (talk) 03:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal status

message: ====Section 1====
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
====Section 2====
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. I'm also not sure how this fits with mandatory military service (the draft), which is still legal in the U.S. though not implemented beyond registering men on their 18th birthday. Rklawton (talk) 03:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Thirteenth Amendment

message: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. I'm also not sure how this fits with mandatory military service (the draft), which is still legal in the U.S. though not implemented beyond registering men on their 18th birthday. Rklawton (talk) 03:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Section 2

message: — Assignment last updated by Isa.katheryn (talk) 02:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Irish Migration in Latin America
Talk:So Much Shouting, So Much Laughter

message: The songs on this double-disc album are all from tours between 2000-2002. It would be nice if the song listings also included the location where each of the songs was actually performed/recorded. Does anyone know where this information could be found? john factorial 23:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Locations

message: The original source of the text on this track was indeed Mario Savio's speech on the steps of the Sproul Hall [see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhFvZRT7Ds0], but the rendering of it on this album is certainly the version paraphrased by Utah Phillips on the track "Unless You Are Free" from his and DiFranco's collaborative record Fellow Workers. The text exactly matches Phillips' version but not Savio's (e.g. Phillips says "there comes a time", Savio originally said "there is a time", et al.), and it's unmistakably the same voice (Phillips' slight lisp) and intonation (unfortunately this track doesn't seem to be on YouTube for comparison purposes). tomasz. 00:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of "Comes a Time"
Talk:List of Defense Ministers of France

message: I changed this page to conform to British spelling for European subjects according to Wikipedia:Tutorial_(Keep_in_mind)#U.S._English_vs._British_English.  Is this wrong to do, just correcting spelling for a region such as British English spelling for the European Union countries.  I thought this was acceptable. -- AxSkov 07:33, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Defence Ministers of France
Talk:Felicity (TV series)

message: The current episode count listed in the article is 84. I count 22 episodes for season one, 23 for two, 17 for three, and 21 for four.
:22+23+17+21=83
Is there something I'm missing here? Let me know before I change 84 to 83. roguegeek (talk·cont) 18:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. I was counting the 2-hour series finale as one episode. They're separate. roguegeek (talk·cont) 19:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode count 

message: "The show's ratings declined in the 1999-2000 season" - the writing quality and themes of the show changed drastically at the very tail end of season 1 and season 2 onwards.  The show went from serious college drama, with quirky comedy bits/side characters, to having paranormal (!) elements (spells? really?).  I wouldn't be surprised if that big change had more to do with ratings than hair styles or time slots. -Scyfer (talk) 16:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I stopped watching because of the hair. Eeekster (talk) 01:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings 

message: In 2007, Felicity was one of Time magazine's "100 Best TV Shows of All-Time."[1] AOL TV named Felicity one of the "Best School Shows of All Time."[2] In June 2010, Entertainment Weekly named Felicity Porter one of the "100 Greatest Characters of the Last 20 Years".
Can't this be summarized by just saying that Time Warner really likes their own show? This is exactly the kind of thing that users of wikipedia should sensor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanJamis (talk • contribs) 02:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preamble 
Template talk:Article resources

message: The title "Sources for articles" is not right; but I don't know what would be better.  If anyone knows one, please put it in. JesseW 10:23, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad title

message: This template survived TFD - see Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/Not_deleted/May_2005. Radiant_* 08:33, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
==2 or 3 Additions to template?==
I'd suggest adding Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange, Wikipedia:Newspapers and magazines request service, and maybe Wikipedia:Library, to this template. The first is a new, quite quiet wikiproject, the 2nd is an old, quiet project, and the 3rd looks dormant. They could all benefit, and all seem related to this template's focus.
Or possibly, one/all of them should be merged into Wikipedia:Research resources, which is marked historical (under the ToC)? That's a lot more work though ;) --Quiddity 05:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: tfd

message: I'd suggest adding Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange, Wikipedia:Newspapers and magazines request service, and maybe Wikipedia:Library, to this template. The first is a new, quite quiet wikiproject, the 2nd is an old, quiet project, and the 3rd looks dormant. They could all benefit, and all seem related to this template's focus.
Or possibly, one/all of them should be merged into Wikipedia:Research resources, which is marked historical (under the ToC)? That's a lot more work though ;) --Quiddity 05:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 or 3 Additions to template?
Category talk:Olympic rowers for Great Britain

message: I'm not too keen on the idea of changing the category from British rowers to Olympic rowers - it's quite possible to get a rower who you could argue was notable who didn't compete for Britain at the Olympics (in some cases because they died before the Olympics started) - e.g. James Renforth. So I'd like to make sure  - we are keeping the British rowers category, and making this one a subset? Average Earthman 10:29, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  OLympic rowers