lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sodium formate

message: SODIUM FORMATE is used to prepare solids free 
workover and completion fluids  for oil well drilling with densities from 8.4 up to 11.0 lb/gal.
SODIUM FORMATE brines contribute to formation damage control by stabilizing the water sensitive clays 
during workover and completion operations.
SODIUM FORMATE brines eliminate the risk of scale formation  when either the produced gas or formation 
waters are rich in carbonate and sulfate ions.
Formate-base brines have better HSE characteristics than chloride and bromide brines.
Dayal42 (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tularosa Basin

message: On 23 December 2006 Mmcannis added Category:Natural history of New Mexico.  On 9 June 2007 Hmains removed it.  Natural history refers to plants or animals, so at first glance categorizing an article about geology and physical geography, in this case a landform, under "Natural history" would seem inappropriate. However, even though an article is about a landform, if the landform creates an environment which produces a particular ecosystem and if the article discusses that particular ecosystem, then categorizing the article under a Natural history subject would be appropriate. The Tularosa Basin does produce a particular ecosystem, in fact a couple of them.  In one ecosystem the Oscura Mountains chipmunk (Tamias quadrivittatus oscuraensis) is unique to the Basin. It is true that the "Ecology" section of the article is not very fleshed out, but I do think that it is enough to justify having the category Natural history of New Mexico. --Bejnar 21:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On 15 June 2007 Hmains again removed Category:Natural history of New Mexico without discussion.  I have today restored it.  If there is a reason why the reasoning above does not support the category, please explain before deleting. --Bejnar 01:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Natural history of New Mexico

message: It is redundant to have the article categorized under both Category:Landforms of New Mexico and Category:Landforms of the United States.  The point of subcategories is to avoid large bulky categories.  --Bejnar 21:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Landforms of ...
Talk:Irish kilt

message: Yep, merge it. A kilt is a kilt. There's no need to balkanise it into modern, Scottish, Irish, etc. Better that people can read all about kilts in a single article. -- Derek Ross | Talk 20:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And under that subjective logic we should have separate article on women's trousers, Scottish trousers, Irish trousers, American pants, etc. but in truth the biggest difference lies in the people wearing them, rather than in the garments themselves. -- Derek Ross | Talk 15:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kobato

message: The article links to fansites, so I was thinking that these should be removed. Kiseki-chi (talk) 10:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links?

message: May I recommend editing the article to clearly separate the anime differences to the manga. Currently, it seems that the plot and character information is somewhat mixed in terms of origination. The anime seems to have changed several parts, so it's worth separating this information to avoid confusion. Peter Shillito (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Anime Differences
Talk:UEFA Euro 1980 qualifying

message: I found article from July 1976 claiming that Wales was to be excluded from Euro 1980 as punishment for crowd trouble in Euro 1976 qf. Obviously this decision was revoked before the qualifying draw was made. Anyone knows more about that? 109.173.211.121 (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Wales ban
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Versoma

message: There is no reason why the entry for the music group Versoma should have been deleted. They are a widely known band that has toured extensively with other notable acts. If you do not know about a specific genre of music, or art in general, do not act as if you do. Just because they are not Aerosmith does not mean they're entry should have been deleted. This act is reflective of an unfair, hierarchical tendency which Wikipedia is not often guilty of. I move to reinstate the Versoma entry.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.149.217.225 (talk • contribs) 
::: Wikipedia works by consensus. The consensus disagreed with you. And vandalizing the AfD as you did here isn't going to win many editors over to your cause. wikipediatrix 02:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Portal talk:Energy/Did you know

message: There is a need to expand the number of facts in the pool - please note suggestions below. Facts should not be from stub articles, and the fact should normally have a reference in the article so that it can be followed up. A total of 7 or 8 suitable quotations is needed before a new group can be created.
===From March 2008===
* The Ameralik Span across Ameralik fjord in Greenland with a span width of 5,376 metres is the longest span of an electrical overhead powerline in the world. 
:Would be used  once article has been expanded.Beagel 08:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be used  once article has been expanded. Beagel 12:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded and the fact has been verified.Beagel (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded and the fact has been verified.Beagel (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded.Beagel (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded.Beagel (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used after verification.Beagel (talk) 14:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded.  Beagel (talk) 08:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest a quotation

message: * The Ameralik Span across Ameralik fjord in Greenland with a span width of 5,376 metres is the longest span of an electrical overhead powerline in the world. 
:Would be used  once article has been expanded.Beagel 08:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be used  once article has been expanded. Beagel 12:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded and the fact has been verified.Beagel (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded and the fact has been verified.Beagel (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded.Beagel (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded.Beagel (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used after verification.Beagel (talk) 14:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Would be used once article has been expanded.  Beagel (talk) 08:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: From March 2008
Category talk:Change to Win Federation

message: I removed the infobox and the first two paragraphs about CTW. If someone wants to learn about Change To Win, they should go to the article. Under the Wikipedia guidelines, category pages should, at the most, contain a description of what should go in the category. Nothing more. - Tim1965 01:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox removal
Talk:Dutch in Seven Lessons

message: Some people claim it's a documentary, some a comedy.  Someone who has seen the film, please edit appropriately. —wfaulk 20:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comedy or Documentary 
Talk:Surf and turf

message: I've also eaten a marron & beef combo called "Paddock & Dam".
Gemfyre 12:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paddock & Dam
Talk:2 Bit Pie

message: Hi, I added http://www.2bitpie.net as an external link, which I run myself. I am posting this message here so that if anyone objects they can remove it, but I'm pretty sure it is the most up to date (if only) fan site in existence for the band and provides useful information.
Martin Hinks 13:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 
Talk:21st Century Schizoid Band

message: "Wallace's death in February 2007 would seem to have closed the lid on the band for good."
In the previous sentence, it was said that Wallace was to be replaced, so if a replacement is possible, why would his death stop anything?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.65.22 (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This make no sense

message: Following Ian Wallace's passing... although that's a matter of WP:CRYSTAL for the moment. It'll be one to watch. Their website says they haven't toured since 2004, hiatus maybe?--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 19:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I wonder if Michael Giles will rejoin this group...=
Talk:Jack of the United States

message: What is the point of having a Jack flag in the first place? Why not just use your country’s ensign? 2601:647:5800:3B60:D531:7936:4EE8:3494 (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: Why do we have two versions of the current jack?
We have "Naval jack of the United States.svg" and "Jack of the United States.svg"
 
According to the page of the one on the left, the one on the right uses the correct Pantone colors.  So shouldn't the Pantone version be the preferred version?  I suggest we remove "Naval jack of the United States.svg" and replace it with "Jack of the United States.svg" in both instances of use. SixFourThree (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple versions?
Talk:A.R. Kane

message: The date of the promotional photo, 1979, is not correct if they formed in the eighties.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.232.95 (talk) 08:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect date on promo photo
Talk:Act (band)

message: The dark haired female dancer who appears in this video looks familar. Any ideas who she is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.196 (talk) 14:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query re.performer in 'Snobbery and decay' video 
Talk:Ad Infinitum (British band)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Move to the alternative disambiguation using nationality. (non-admin closure)  microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 02:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Relisting comment: in consideration for the nationality dab, and adding Ad Infinitum (metal band) to this request as a result. – robertsky (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 March 2024
Talk:Hugh Fraser (actor)

message: I have cited a reference: Agatha Christies's Poirot: The Collection, Volume 2, The Mysterious Affair at Styles. This includes a biographical article about Hugh Fraser (no year or date of birth given) and states he and his wife have a daughter. This article had stated they had a son. I have changed it to show they have 1 child as I can not verify which is correct. The article says he was in a rock band, but doesn't give the name of the band. Again, I couldn't find much online to help expand the article further. MrsPlum 02:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alberto y Lost Trios Paranoias

message: Didn't I see them on OGWT with one of them (at least) wearing dreadlocks made out of curly/spiral guitar cables (which were much is fashion at the time) while doing some of the the snuff rock EP??  Candy 14:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whistle test? 

message: An anonymous IP who was heavily editing this article was also maliciously vandalizing the "Urgh! A Music War" article.  That person's edits should probably be scrutinized very carefully. AnonMoos (talk) 05:14, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks AnonMoos - a sock of User:FaisalMusicFan99 who regularly vandalizes articles related to Alberto y Lost Trios Paranoias and certain other targets. - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Posible vandalism warning
Talk:The Albion Band

message: I'm sure it's good to have a correct full list of past members, but do we really need to be told twice? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Members 

message: I've made a start, concentrating on studio albums only, but it's not exhaustive. Yorkist (talk) 00:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: They were The Albion Country Band really for only one album and it is not even clear that they were really the same band (no continuity of personnel). They were clearly the Albion Band for thirty-two years. As I have been going through the English Folk, Electric/Folk Rock articles I found they are very rarely called anything but the Albion Band. Clearly this page should be moved to Albion Band and Albion Country Band should redirect there. --Sabrebd (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the Rose

message: So "the reputation of the album has since been marred"? Is that a supportable fact? There may well have been plagiarism of a song by Stan Rogers. But the source for this claim is: Garnet Rogers, Night Drive: Travels with My Brother (Brampton, ON: Tickle Shore Publishing, 2016), pp 400-401. I don't have a copy to hand , but that's just two pages in a book by Rogers' brother? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolfe 

message: As far as I can see, Lol Coxhill played on one track on "No Roses" - does that really make him a member ? --  Beardo (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why not. The Albion Band were a very friendly bunch. Yes, it was on Shirley Collins' 1971 No Roses (a truly wonderful album, by the way), and only on the track "Claudy Banks" (although it was a composed duo performance by him and Alan Cave on bassoon). The entire glorious 30 seconds are here. But curiously this is not mentioned at all in the Lol Coxhill article. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:15, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lol Coxhill
Talk:All Seeing I

message: There are two reviews of the album here:http://www.nme.com/reviews/1417 and here:http://www.allmusic.com/album/pickled-eggs-sherbert-mw0000464022 Sweetie candykim (talk) 13:23, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where do I add reviews for the album?
Talk:Andwella

message: I don't want to rock any boats, but what was the thought behind the redirect?
The band was called Andwella's Dream first, and it doesn't seem to be normal practice to redirect to later names.
In addition, they're better known as Andwella's Dream - the page as stands even acknowledges the first album, under that name, is the rare one (and is the one most talked about).
I've tinkered a bit with the page to tighten it. If there's no major grumps or serious rationale, I'll redirect it back to its old title later.
I thankewe   Brieflysentient (talk) 16:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect from Andwell'a Dream
Talk:Another Sunny Day

message: Another Sunny Day was, on record, entirely the work of Harvey Williams (musician). He subseuently dropped the name and recorded under his own name. There is no need for two separate articles, and there is currently duplication between the two. His work as Another Sunny Day is probably better know than his releases under his own name, so I think it makes sense to merge here. --Michig (talk) 10:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any opposition, I have gone ahead and merged. --Michig (talk) 16:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Apartment 26

message: Whoever said this is a metal band obviously know nothing about the genre.--190.17.14.189 (talk) 05:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not metal. 
Talk:Apollo 100

message: What about their 'Classical Gas' album ?
MFP 50526
Original Sound Recording made by Young Blood Records
This compilation 1981 Music for Please  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.132.51 (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Discogs also lists 2 other albums by Apollo 100 not mentioned in this article: Melodies With a Beat and Ballet and Opera. A third additional album listed there, Rhapsody in Rock, is just a reissue of the Joy album with the tracks in a different order.  A 4th additional album mentioned on the discogs page, Apollo Plays the Best of Bacharach, is apparently a related project not involving the original members of Apollo 100. Apollo 100 | Discography | Discogs. Spiritquest (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Album

message: I would like to remove mentions of songs in commercials because of the retail apocalypse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CodyFinke2019 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In order to consolidate discussion of this subject, which has been raised on multiple articles, please consider contributing at Talk:I Can See for Miles#Removal of songs in commercials. Thank you. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 02:16, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

text: What's the motive for removing songs from commercials in these various locations? Spiritquest (talk) 04:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing songs from commercials
Talk:Arcadia (band)

message: I noticed Arcadia's genre had been changed from New Wave to New Romantic, and reverted the change. My rationale for doing so is largely for the following reasons:
:1) New Romantic is, by definition, a term used almost exclusively in the U.K., and while Arcadia may have been from the U.K., we all know that we're supposed to write with a neutral worldview. 
:2) New Romantic is essentially a subgenre of a subgenre. I'm reasonably sure that the broad consensus is that this isn't helpful to the average person. Basically, we're not Pitchfork Media, and imagineering new genres isn't the mark of a good article.
:3) I checked AMG and a couple of other sites, and could find no reference to Arcadia being "New Romantic". If we're going to change the genre, it needs to be cited somewhere.
-- Kevin 21:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverting from "New Romantic" to "New Wave" 
Talk:Architechs

message: Just curious why someone would use my name to vandalise this page? Have absolutely no idea who on Earth the Architechs are... my name showed up on this in a random Google search. Ah well, have reverted it now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hulleye (talk • contribs) 07:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aysheaia

message: 72.134.44.224 20:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Armageddon (British band)

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:Ashton, Gardner and Dyke

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: The status of guitarist Vince Melouney is not clear. This page at 45 Cat, for the 1969 single "Maiden Voyage", suggests that he was both producer and composer. Was he also a band member? And if so, when? His own article makes no mention. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Vince Melouney]]
Talk:Audio Bullys

message: The discography is filled up okay but the actual info about the band is lacking.
An infobox would also be appreciated if anyone knows enough about them? GBobly 23:32, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marked as stub 

message: Support split of Back to Mine: Audio Bullys  - Back to Mine: Audio Bullys has been reviewed by  "103.5 QM/FM, Counterculture and The Guardian (among others). --Jax 0677 (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: '' Back to Mine: Audio Bullys ''

message: Support split of "Only Man"  - "Only Man" has been reviewed by PopMatters, BBC Online and Consequence of Sound (among others). --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Only Man"
Talk:Monte Carlo Baby

message: This comment has been moved from the main page to here as it contains information that should be taken into consideration when looking into the accuracy of this article. It was entered by User:Audreyfan.
*This article is incorrect. Both films were shot simultaneously in 1951 with somewhat different casts for the two versions. According to Jerry Vermilye's book "The complete films of Audrey Hepburn" the French version was released in 1952 and the English version in 1953.
It should also be noted that IMDb (which I know is not 100% reliable) does list 1951 as the year of British release, although they do not have an exact date. They then list 1953 as the year of US release which may or may not be part of the discrepancy noted above. A check of the French version shows that it premiered in Belgium Dec. 14, 1951 and in France on Jan. 25, 1952MarnetteD | Talk 18:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion over release dates

message: I've moved the following text here which had been written at the end of the article
::The main entry is so obviously written by somebody who knows nothing about the subject that I'm surprised it's still not ben drastically changed. The French film was the main one and the English version was secondary.  The main stars were the Ray Ventura band and the production company was French.  It was only released in the USA after Hepburn's success in "Roman holiday".
I'm no expert on this film so this may be right, but this comment belongs here rather than in the article itself.Lord Cornwallis (talk) 04:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved Here

message: This movie is not British ; it's French. It was shoot in french and english at the same time. 84.99.239.143 (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  French movie...