Talk:Naruto Uzumaki/Archive 3

message: The part two section of Naruto is divided into New Personality and New Abilities. However, the New abilities section seems to be explaining the plot more than new abilities. Should a separate section for that under the "_______ arc" be added for it? Cherries Jubilee 06:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part 2 Section 

message: Even though he is still a Genin, Naruto is far from that level. Shouldn't it be added Genin(although Chunin level in ability or above) be put in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.189.67.134 (talk • contribs) 
:No because we're listing their current ranks, not the level at which they fight. // Sasuke-kun27 23:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank 

message: Even though it's official that Naruto is a Genin indefinately, I don't even know how has Naruto been denied in being promoted to Chunin. Can you tell me what happened that caused Naruto to  still be a Genin? ----joey368 11:26, June 20 2007 (UTC)
:No Chunin exam yet.Jacce 14:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Rank 

message: There's been a dispute between User:Someguy0830 and me (PL(DB)) about whether the Naruto characters can also shape-shift even though they can use Transform Jutsu, meaning that they can also transform into other objects. To be able to change size and properties (such as transform into a sharp object) is not an illusion or inconsistency as Someguy said and I shall explain why.
:Add  * Support   * Comment  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~
===Discussion===
:Add any additional comments if needed:
I think that the Naruto characters can transform into basically any object. "Why" you ask? Naruto Uzumaki himself changed into a closed Fuuma Shuriken (which was then able to be opened up) with his Shadow Clone throwing him to Sasuke Uchiha. The problem of weight for Sasuke to throw him at Zabuza was nothing since Naruto's weight was as that of the Fuuma Shurikens'. If it was the actual Naruto as an illusion, do you think that Naruto could still be thrown like that? Also Gamabunta transformed into something that had claws (something he didn't have before) to grip Shukaku so Naruto can wake up Gaara. For more details, see Someguy's talk page for more specifics about the dispute as to the fact that the characters in Naruto can shapeshift. (Such as Oolong and Pu'ar of Dragon Ball, Shippo of InuYasha, Count Dracula, etc.) I really feel the need to add this :Category:Fictional characters with the power to shapeshift at the bottom of each character's page as a category because they can shapeshift. PL(DB) 17:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And by the way, unless you can come up with an external source, what you're polling/discussing is original research and cannot be included in the article. --Deskana (For Great Justice!) 19:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't outargue me so you want to win through a poll? Speculate all you want. The fact remains that it's original research as Deskana stated. No matter what the outcome is, it won't accomplish anything. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm only trying to prove a point here. See my discusiion below. PL(DB) 23:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, so I'm guessing some of you guys don't mind then if I add some of those categories then? I'm only trying to point out that the Naruto technique called Transform Jutsu is not an illusion technique. It is a ninjutsu. Naruto was able to change into as small as a Fuuma Shuriken to fit in his knapsack, then be tossed easily to Sasuke by Naruto's clone. I've already shown some external links from www.narutomangareturns.com/ to Someguy0830 as proof. Boss frog Gamabunta transformed with Naruto to a faster animal with claws (Kyubi). But I'm not sure if Naruto threw two little shuriken at those Samurai of Gatou's who were actual Kage Bunshin of Naruto transformed (since it has never been revealed). But yeah, some of those important categories Snapper2 named should be added in the articles (maybe not fictional nudist, etc., unless there is a character like that in Naruto that does that). By the way, I began a discussion before I even made a vote in that survey. The survey above only exist in case consensus needs to be reached. Get it? I'm not trying to be disruptive to prove something, but actually trying to prove to Someguy0830 once and for all, that the Transform Jutsu is not an illusion. It is merely more closer to a real form of something then it is to an illusion. PL(DB) 23:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't prove anything. This is you using polls to get your way because you can't defend your point. I will remove the categories, because I've made it quite clear, as has Deskana, that your personal interpretation is not acceptable proof. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even see my proof from Naruto Manga Returns? That is where I'm basing this idea from, Someguy0830. Do you even know what OR is to be exact? PL(DB) 23:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "An edit counts as original research if it introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source." I know what original research is. You clearly do not. You are using this poll in such a way to make your point more valid when you lack the ability to source it. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What in the heck are you talkin' about? I did source it. It's the Naruto manga clip. It's canon. Can you at least answer the question? Do you still think that the Transform Jutsu is an illusion and not a real form taking ability? Please don't answer anything to me like "It doesn't matter what I think. It's still original research. Stop bringing up this damn argument," Or something of that nature. PL(DB) 23:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will continue answering you like that until you pay attention. Your argument is "an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments" and yet you continue to ignore this fact. I honestly don't know how to put it any clearer, so I'll put it much more bluntly. Stop being dense and listen closely. The manga/anime is the primary source. You are not allowed to interpret the primary source in anything but the most basic of ways. What you are doing is trying to make a point by interpreting the primary source. This is what original research is. Give an external source (not manga scans) to prove your point or let it go. You're only cluttering these pages to get your way, otherwise. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, why didn't cha say that before then? So you want a site that says that Naruto characters can shapeshift, right? Yet, you still didn't answer my question... PL(DB) 23:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, but it wasn't an illusion either. Gamabunta had actual claws when transformed as a Kyubi, right? The Fuuma Shuriken transformation made Naruto small enough that he had fit inside his own knapsack. How do you answer that? Is it a screw-up by the author or is it intentional? What we don't know for sure is that could he had cut Zabuza if Zabuza hadn't dodged the Naruto-henge-ed Fumma Shuriken? PL(DB) 00:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Supposition and heresay will not prove your point. Illusions by their very definition allow for leeway. Give an external and reliable source saying beyond a shadow of a doubt it's shapeshifting or let it go. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with Gunslinger47 that this transformation jutsu is a physical alteration rather than an illusion. The category is not wrong but it's pointless.AbelinCAusesobad 06:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey/Discussion 

message: :Add any additional comments if needed:
I think that the Naruto characters can transform into basically any object. "Why" you ask? Naruto Uzumaki himself changed into a closed Fuuma Shuriken (which was then able to be opened up) with his Shadow Clone throwing him to Sasuke Uchiha. The problem of weight for Sasuke to throw him at Zabuza was nothing since Naruto's weight was as that of the Fuuma Shurikens'. If it was the actual Naruto as an illusion, do you think that Naruto could still be thrown like that? Also Gamabunta transformed into something that had claws (something he didn't have before) to grip Shukaku so Naruto can wake up Gaara. For more details, see Someguy's talk page for more specifics about the dispute as to the fact that the characters in Naruto can shapeshift. (Such as Oolong and Pu'ar of Dragon Ball, Shippo of InuYasha, Count Dracula, etc.) I really feel the need to add this :Category:Fictional characters with the power to shapeshift at the bottom of each character's page as a category because they can shapeshift. PL(DB) 17:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And by the way, unless you can come up with an external source, what you're polling/discussing is original research and cannot be included in the article. --Deskana (For Great Justice!) 19:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't outargue me so you want to win through a poll? Speculate all you want. The fact remains that it's original research as Deskana stated. No matter what the outcome is, it won't accomplish anything. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm only trying to prove a point here. See my discusiion below. PL(DB) 23:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, so I'm guessing some of you guys don't mind then if I add some of those categories then? I'm only trying to point out that the Naruto technique called Transform Jutsu is not an illusion technique. It is a ninjutsu. Naruto was able to change into as small as a Fuuma Shuriken to fit in his knapsack, then be tossed easily to Sasuke by Naruto's clone. I've already shown some external links from www.narutomangareturns.com/ to Someguy0830 as proof. Boss frog Gamabunta transformed with Naruto to a faster animal with claws (Kyubi). But I'm not sure if Naruto threw two little shuriken at those Samurai of Gatou's who were actual Kage Bunshin of Naruto transformed (since it has never been revealed). But yeah, some of those important categories Snapper2 named should be added in the articles (maybe not fictional nudist, etc., unless there is a character like that in Naruto that does that). By the way, I began a discussion before I even made a vote in that survey. The survey above only exist in case consensus needs to be reached. Get it? I'm not trying to be disruptive to prove something, but actually trying to prove to Someguy0830 once and for all, that the Transform Jutsu is not an illusion. It is merely more closer to a real form of something then it is to an illusion. PL(DB) 23:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't prove anything. This is you using polls to get your way because you can't defend your point. I will remove the categories, because I've made it quite clear, as has Deskana, that your personal interpretation is not acceptable proof. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you even see my proof from Naruto Manga Returns? That is where I'm basing this idea from, Someguy0830. Do you even know what OR is to be exact? PL(DB) 23:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "An edit counts as original research if it introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source." I know what original research is. You clearly do not. You are using this poll in such a way to make your point more valid when you lack the ability to source it. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What in the heck are you talkin' about? I did source it. It's the Naruto manga clip. It's canon. Can you at least answer the question? Do you still think that the Transform Jutsu is an illusion and not a real form taking ability? Please don't answer anything to me like "It doesn't matter what I think. It's still original research. Stop bringing up this damn argument," Or something of that nature. PL(DB) 23:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will continue answering you like that until you pay attention. Your argument is "an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments" and yet you continue to ignore this fact. I honestly don't know how to put it any clearer, so I'll put it much more bluntly. Stop being dense and listen closely. The manga/anime is the primary source. You are not allowed to interpret the primary source in anything but the most basic of ways. What you are doing is trying to make a point by interpreting the primary source. This is what original research is. Give an external source (not manga scans) to prove your point or let it go. You're only cluttering these pages to get your way, otherwise. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, why didn't cha say that before then? So you want a site that says that Naruto characters can shapeshift, right? Yet, you still didn't answer my question... PL(DB) 23:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, but it wasn't an illusion either. Gamabunta had actual claws when transformed as a Kyubi, right? The Fuuma Shuriken transformation made Naruto small enough that he had fit inside his own knapsack. How do you answer that? Is it a screw-up by the author or is it intentional? What we don't know for sure is that could he had cut Zabuza if Zabuza hadn't dodged the Naruto-henge-ed Fumma Shuriken? PL(DB) 00:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Supposition and heresay will not prove your point. Illusions by their very definition allow for leeway. Give an external and reliable source saying beyond a shadow of a doubt it's shapeshifting or let it go. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree with Gunslinger47 that this transformation jutsu is a physical alteration rather than an illusion. The category is not wrong but it's pointless.AbelinCAusesobad 06:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Should it be noted that Naruto is an asian character, yet he has blonde hair and blue eyes? Then again that one girl has pink hair...
:It's anime. It doesn't have to make sense. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Naruto is supposed to have Japanese facial features.  In one of the earlier tankōbon, Kishimoto includes a "realistic" drawing of Naruto.  Varying hair, eye and skin color should generally not be seen as unusual or significant in anime, for reasons touched upon by Someguy above. –Gunslinger47 10:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't think it is necessary to mention that due to the fact that there is not much reason to believe that he would be any other nationality. For example, it is not mentioned  that Timmy Turner from Farily Odd Parents or that Danny Phantom was american etc. --69.156.206.48 02:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most anime charicatures are drawn in an ornate style. I mean "natural" orange hair? Generally, the characters are supposed to be viewed as Japanese though(I guess it's Japan's way of shaping the way for multiracialism?). Except in manga like Dragonball, Zoids, Beet the Vandelbuster, which occur in alternate timelines or universes, or when otherwise stated, like with Panther, from the manga Eyeshield 21 (who is  introduced as American). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.194.104.5 (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

text: In some animes like naruto, it takes place in another world, but with similar languages like american, japaense, etc. they also have similar technologies--BurningNinja786 20:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naruto is asian?

message: Alright, with Naruto's anime moving into the Naruto II territory it might be time for us to start thinking about updating the picture... and I believe I know the perfect one. For those familiar with the later issues of Naruto, the picture I'm thinking of is the one with the older Naruto and younger Naruto standing in front of a police-lineup style height marker. It'd be useful as a comparison AND to illustrate the differences between part one and two.
I personally think it would be perfect, but unfortunately I don't have the picture on me right now. I'll get an image of it up ASAP, however. Cheers, Lankybugger 18:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm aware, the policy has only been like that for now due to the absence of Naruto II mateiral in the anime... Regardless, I don't view it as much of a spoiler. There are articles which don't conform to this policy you mention (see Son Goku (Dragon Ball) and pretty much all of the Dragon Ball articles). Besides, anyone who reads the infoboxes for characters like Asuma Sarutobi are going to be in for a pretty nasty shock. Cheers, Lankybugger 19:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dragon Ball is a series English speakers will be fully aware of, as it has aired here already in its entirety. Naruto has barely run through half of its non-filler episodes in English speaking countries. Using the pre-timeskip pic is appropriate for the infobox. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The picture I was thinking would be good is located here. Anybody think this one suits better? I like it because it quite nicely contrasts the differences between Naruto at 12 and Naruto at 15. Cheers, Lankybugger 00:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I just saw the new image.  It's ok, but Naruto isn't wearing his goggles or forehead protector, so he kinda looks weird.Ziiv 00:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Picture Suggestion 

message: what was that wind attack naruto used to destroy  sasuke Fire Release: Great Fireball Technique and create ripples on the surfaces of the water in episode 131, because it had to be sume kind of jutsu to do all and pulling back the skin on sasukes face. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.3.16.1 (talk) 03:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was no jutsu, merely brute force. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Yep. As Sasuke states, it's pure Chakra. Cheers, Lankybugger 14:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Humorously translated in the subs I've seen by ANBU as 'coercion-ness.' Retlor 11:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is that attack? 

message: Maybe getting rid of the demon fox section and replaing it with a link to the Tailed beast article because it also has something simillar to this section here.Sam ov the blue sand 03:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That part is important. Focus on the plot summary. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well in that case then Shippuden stuff shouldn't have gotten rid of. Why can't we use my idea, the nine-tailed fox part has all of that stuff so why can't we do it and is there another reason besides " That part is important."? And i'm not trying to fight with you or anything, ok?Sam ov the blue sand 03:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If anything, the effect it has on Naruto doesn't belong in the beast's article. It does belong here. It doesn't need any more reason. It's an important aspect of his character. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh well then now that you've gone into detail about your reasoning, I agree with you.Sam ov the blue sand 04:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  making the article shorter 

message: Shouldn't that be added to Naruto's technique list at the top of the page? Blaxpidey - Feb 4th '07
:I find it unlikely that he'll ever use it again given the existence of his new Wind Spiraling Sphere. ~SnapperTo 20:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The list in the infobox is for "Signature jutsu/Kekkei genkai".  The Ōdama Rasengan is exclusive to Naruto, but it is not signature. –Gunslinger47 21:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I dunno, I still think it should be there... its pretty signature.  Also, if the Uzumaki Naruto Rendan can be included when it has never been reused after the Chunin Exam, I think the Odama Rasengan can be there as well. --GhostStalker(Got a present for ya!) 16:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well i dont think the OR should be put up either...it was likely a one time thing, but I agree you have a point with the naruto Rendan, why the hell IS that up there?--Master Shan 19:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He does the combo at least twice in the series, though the second time with a slight variation.  When I allowed the Rendan to stay in the list, I was under the impression that I've seen it at least one more time somewhere in the filler, specials or movies.  Either way, go ahead and remove it if you disagree. –Gunslinger47 21:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Wrong jutsu.  They were talking about the large version of the normal rasengan. –Gunslinger47 16:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The Odama Rasengan isn't a "half-way" jutsu, its merely a regular Rasengan with much more chakra pumped into it.  There's no elemental component to it.  The Wind Release version itself is a half-way version between the normal Rasengan and some completed version that we have not yet seen.  70.254.219.106 15:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Ball Spiraling Sphere 

message: I just want to ask this question because i think i missed something in the manga, in chapter 251 jiraiya told naruto to not use this jutsu, what was that jutsu he was talking about?
:That detail is never revealed. ~SnapperTo 05:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, because that is so obviously a jutsu. It's got hand seals, an actual name, the one-tailed transformation was given an entry in the databooks, all that jazz. ~SnapperTo 19:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes, the ever famous that jutsu. Originally used by the equally famous that guy. Emphasis on the first word of that phrase. You Can't See Me! 10:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbidden jutsu 

message: I'm not saying he is, but alot of people I know think he's German or of German ancestry. Most say that Their reason for believing this is that he's blonde, blue-eyed and somewhat hyperactive. I know it's pure speculation, but when you think about it, it kind of makes sence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Uber Cuber (talk • contribs) 02:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard that one before. Of course, not only does Naruto probably not take place on Earth, but also if it did, we can't add speculation. Sorry. Retlor 02:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: See my response regarding the "realistic" Naruto drawing by Kishimoto above: #Naruto is asian?. –Gunslinger47 02:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Judging the ethnicity of anime characters based on physicall attributes such as eye or hair color is generally a mistake.--Master Shan 23:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I highly doubt that a character from a Japanese Manga would be made German without it being stated somewhere. Anything unless provided by a stong source would be pure speculation and does not belong here. --67.71.79.125 02:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Retlor nailed it. Naruto is not German, nor is he Japanese, nor Eurasian, nor Terrestrial (at least, not from our Terra). Naruto is Konohan, if such a word exists. Germany and Japan do not seem to exist in Naruto's world. You Can't See Me! 05:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German? 

message: The Naruto Uzumaki article is completly messed up! The infobox has been ruined because some schmuck decided to put in a Naruto Shippuuden picture! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghadden (talk • contribs) 21:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help!

message: I hate to say this after all of that infobox trouble we just had, but that picture should never have been put there. Not only is it now on the page twice, but we should have a pre-timeskip picture in the infobox, just like we do for every character who was introduced pre-timeskip. Retlor 22:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No he isn't. He's still very much a genin. He was away from Konoha for three years, and hasn't had a chance to take a chunin exam. Retlor 15:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh.  Truth be told, Naruto is fighting at a jōnin level.  However for now, he's stuck at genin rank.  Poor Naruto. :) –Gunslinger47 05:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

text:  he was really away for two and half years and it just shows him after time skip there is absoultely nothing really wrong. Blanknothingoknaruto 01:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The shipuden info, including the very same picture, is at the bottom of the page. The infobox pictures for characters introduced pre-timeskip should have pre-timeskip pictures in them. Retlor 02:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: In the 2nd part of the naruto series it is never confirmed that he is 15. if part 1 he is 12 in the begining, which we could say is the begining of the school year, which starts in september.  his b day is in october meaning he turns 13 around when the show starts.  if we assume the anime takes place in about a year and a half,if not a little more we can say naruto is a little over 13 and a half years old, almost 14 so if you look at his training, 2 more years would be 15, and another half would make him about 16 and a half years old.
71.57.18.162 01:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or we could use common sense. 13 + 2.5 = 15.5 — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Firstly, it takes about three years, and there was still a brief gap between when he switched bodies and when Part I ended (in the anime that gap was about 18 years, but in the manga that gap isn't really defined). Second, it was a spur of the moment thing; Orochimaru needed to try to switch bodies or he would have been killed. It would seem likely that if he could have switched bodies under normal circumstances he would have done so immediately, not later on when his body is failing on him. Finally, how are you suggesting half a year has passed? They set out for Sunagakure a few day's after Naruto's return, they go to the Grass country 10 days after doing that, and Naruto begins his couple week training session after that. At most three months has gone by, though that seems to be an overestimate. ~SnapperTo 22:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do the databooks have anything to say on the subject? Retlor 21:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which subject? His age? If so, a Part II databook hasn't come out yet. ~SnapperTo 23:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: This is more... for pictures of each character... but shouldn;t the image at the top of the page, in the profile show Naruto in his "current" apperance ie:Part II? I know it's a miniscule difference, but still... shouldn;t it be up to date, with images of Part II chars at the top, and Part I later? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.152.118.211 (talk) 19:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More people are familiar with his Part I appearance, hence the reason why his Part I picture is shown in the infobox. ~SnapperTo 22:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone changed the image to that of Part II, I changed it back but its appears stuck on Part II image on my computer. Did the best I could do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheUltimate3 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: ok some one deleted an entire section for no damn reason why? it was a bout the fourth hokage --Jackjohnson15 23:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Portal:Naruto/FAQ#Naruto's father, Tobi's identity and other theories. ~SnapperTo 23:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The sub-thread had strayed off topic.  The topic being the improvement of the Naruto Uzumaki page.  Please read your talk page, which you can find here: User talk:Jackjohnson15.  For more information regarding appropriate usage of talk pages, please see the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. –Gunslinger47 04:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion 

message: Umm shouldnt we put possibly deceased next to his age?(Click Naruto: Shippūden the Movie Trailer for reasons.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.185.163.37 (talk) 23:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, click Naruto: Shippūden the Movie for reasons. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 23:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, I doubt very much that he'd die permanently. It's more likely to be a sort of "Oh no! He died! We have to revive him! Yay! Happy ending!" sort of thing. You Can't See Me! 03:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead or Alive? 

message: Why is the Part II entry gone and replaced by (a pretty much needless) entry on his battle record? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.88.64.132 (talk) 10:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is a move to delete anything plot related from character pages, and move it all to the plot of Naruto pages. Retlor 15:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You would be correct in that assumption, sir. NeoChaosX  (talk, walk) 15:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And the battle section in the article is needed then...why? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheUltimate3 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just thought that the battle record would be a nice touch, since the record of his battles in plot context had dissappeared. I'm not all that attatched to it, so delete it if you wish. You Can't See Me! 22:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can we at least attempt to add order back to the thread. At the moment its kind of...awkward. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheUltimate3 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the Part II entry is gone...why? 

message: It says that Naruto failed the Academy exam 3 times, yet the flashbacks show the other characters as being in his class for longer than than they should have been if he had (assuming each time he failed he joined the class that was below him the previous year), can someone clear this up? Avatarofrage 12:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unknown. It may be that he retook the exams after failing, as opposed to staying back a year. It may simply be that Kishimoto made a mistake with the timeline.Retlor 18:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems as though the amount of time one needs to reach the next level is variable. For instance, Kakashi claims to have reached Jonin level by twelve years, and Itachi made ANBU captain at 13, was it? Perhaps the same applies to academy students; I can easily imagine the overaspiring Naruto attempting to take the exit exam two years too early. You Can't See Me! 19:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time at the academy