lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Icaro Air

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://icarolaverdad.ubicatv.com/historia/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That page is in Spanish, but the text added here is a very close translation. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:LATAM Airlines Ecuador

message: Although it's been reverted a long time ago, I'd like to point out that someone with the IP: 76.167.244.236 changed the URL of four different airlines to a fake website claiming to be the english webpage. 
These websites were actually of a travel agency that has domain names similar to those of the airlines.
I'm guessing that this might happen again (given a commercial interest). I don't know if there's any use in blocking this IP now, but I leave this note so that if someone finds an odd link like I did (on the Santa Bárbara Airlines article) they can be sure that it's a fake and revert it. JunCTionS 00:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: fake website

message: I removed a statement indicating that Boeing 787s ordered by LAN Chile would be distributed to LAN (now LATAM) Ecuador. I believe that the original editor took the statement out of context; here's what the cited source (which was archived) actually said:  Although somewhat obscured by corporate PR fluff, this does not say that LAN Ecuador (or LAN Peru and LAN Argentina) will actually operate the new aircraft; it says that LAN Chile will operate the aircraft on new international routes while the three subsidiary airlines in the LAN Chile network will codeshare. (LATAM Chile later received and started operating the 787, while the subsidiaries did not.) Carguychris (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  787 order
Talk:TAME

message: I've semi-protected the article for a week. , please read WP:BRD, your edit was reverted, so it should now be discussed. By rights you should be blocked for edit warring. If you have any changes you wish to make to the article, bring them up on this talk page for discussion. Mjroots (talk) 05:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protected

message: Is Tame flying from Quito to Manta on the 16th of June 2020.  If so how much does it cost.15:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flight information
Talk:Al forno

message: Context? Please help.
Johngagon 05:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really clear why there is an article about this. Also, you have no resources cited, the article is not categorized, and nothing links to it. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 07:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it indicated "why" there is an article about this and what is the criteria for a new article? I'm read up on a couple of wikipedia pages on how to write articles, avoiding weasel words etc etc. Someone more rigorous than myself no doubt may fix more later but I hope I gave it a good start. The anyone/new persons editing policies should also apply I'm guessing as I am pretty new. Feel free to show me around via my user talk page as well if you find time. I am in the meantime still learning on my own though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johngagon (talk • contribs) 00:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Insufficient context" template 
Talk:Curley Johnson

message: Due to the death of this person, the BLP status of this article has changed. "This does not mean that unsourced material that would contravene the Biography of Living Persons rules can be added to this article. Capitalistroadster (talk) 03:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP status change
Talk:Helicopter deck

message: The redirect Helicopter dick has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Elli (talk | contribs) 23:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Helicopter dick]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ecuatoriana de Aviación

message: Ecuatoriana de Aviación never flew to Israel, Costa Rica, Spain, Bolivia, Uruguay or San Francisco. Someone should change that false information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.236.138 (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Destinations of Ecuatoriana de Aviación
Talk:AMC Airlines

message: According to this article AMC Aviation (mother company I presume) has bought 49% stake in Air Mali back in 2002.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1973758.stm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.145.246.78 (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMC and Air Mali 

message: I've reverted the recent vandalism to this article by rolling back all edits by Moemensahawy. Would another editor care to check the reversion and extract any good material that was inserted (if any) along with the vandalism. Mjroots (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism reverted

message: I have reverted this  edit. The source added is not reliable. If this editor behind multiple IP continues with their reversions I will request the page to be protected.--Jetstreamer  16:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planespotters is not a reliable source
Talk:Banshkhali Upazila

message: Hi, friend. I am Abdul Gafur Emon. I am from Pakistan in kalipur under Banskhali upazila. Are you also from Banskhali? Professionally, I am an English teacher and lawyer. I teach English after my court in tuitions and batches at Chawkbazar, Jamalkhan, Andorkilah and other nearby areas in Chittagong city. You can meet me or call anytime for any help. My voice-008801838332381 Emon61 (talk) 11:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in Banskhali
Talk:Women's major golf championships

message: Hi I'd like to propose formatting the major winners table to bring all "eras" within the scope of one table, rather than several separate ones, as is current. The current system looks rather disorganised and for the casual reader could be confusing, particularly to those who are not aware of the history of women's majors, which is very different to that of men's golf, and thus requires a different tabular solution to that used on their page and also that of male and female tennis Grand Slam winners. 
The proposal I have in mind brings each major line (5 total) into alignment and includes the descriptions covering years when a major was not being held (eg "not considered a major"), as before. The colours utilised within to highlight the eras, major names and descriptions are open to debate; I propose 3 shades of grey to differentiate between each of these.
Thoughts on these suggestions everyone?
Thanks
Ross-shire (talk) 01:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The four tables delineate four distinct eras and it's easier to read with a little bit of space between the tables instead of running them all together.  --Crunch (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

text: I think the four tables looks better than one large one. Too much "blank space" with one table. Tewapack (talk) 06:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Eras

message: I removed the most extreme of the lengthy and detailed comparisons of women's majors to men's majors and Champions Tour majors.  This article is not titled, "How women's majors are like or not like men's majors."  The article Men's major golf championships contains no comparison to women's majors.  If you want an article that compares majors among tours, create that article. --Crunch (talk) 23:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Men's Tour and Champion's Tour 

message: In 2023 the Women's PGA Championship is scheduled (according to the dates in the table) for June 22–25 (2nd major of the year) and the U.S. Women's Open is scheduled (according to the dates in the table) for July 6–9 (3rd major of the year). At present it looks like (from left to right) the U.S. Women's Open is the 2nd major of the year and the Women's PGA Championship is the 3rd major of the year. Are the dates in the table accurate? If they are then the heading order should change or a note should be put in saying that the majors were not played in the order shown in the table. (Fran Bosh (talk) 16:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed Tewapack (talk) 21:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 order
Talk:Luxor Air

message: left|200px
But I don't know where to add it. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 17:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This plane sits on an unused runway at Roberts International Airport in Liberia. As I understand it, ownership is disputed because of failure to make payments, whether by Luxor Air or a Liberian or other African airline I do not know.Alan (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice photo
Talk:Chain of Command (2000 film)

message: This article desperatly needs wikification. I attempted to start by adding an infobox but most of the information I can't quickly find and based on its reviews I'm in no mood to rent the film just to watch the credits. (I do apologize for my terrible spelling mistakes) Williw (talk) 03:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I got the main cast list and a plot summary (under my main "Estil" account) for you (could use more polish though).76.177.160.69 (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs wikification
Talk:Integrative learning

message: I believe that medical school admissions committees (for one) refer to integrated curriculums with something more specific in mind.  At my school we take it to mean the integration of embryology, physiology and anatomy in the first year, as well as PBL classes.  Perhaps a sub section here or a disambiguation page?
--Bakerstmd 06:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical School curriculum 

message: I just skipped five links concerning integral teaching:
* Integral art    
* Integral psychology    
* Integral theory    
* Integral Institute   
* Integral (philosophy), teachings that seek a comprehensive understanding of humans and the universe  
I skipped it when I found out that integral philosophy wants to combining scientific with spiritual insights, and that seems not the case with integrative learning. Now I am a not-native English speaker and the words themselves looked kind of similair to me. Maybe this article could also mention something about the (big) difference there is between those things? - Mdd 12:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The difference between Integrative and integral learning 

message: "Integrated curriculum" re-directs here, but the text explicitly says "This higher education concept is distinct from the elementary and high school 'integrated curriculum' movement."  What, then, is "integrated curriculum"?64.53.191.77 (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrated Curriculum
Category talk:Swedish people of Czech descent

message: "Swedes of Czech descent"?  You must be joking.  What about Left-Handed "Swedes of Czech descent" Whose Last Name Starts With A P?  More seriously, I propose this category be eliminated.  Thus far, there are but four.  How many more notable ones can there be? 4.249.114.224 06:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Notcensored2

message: This concerns the edits of [ 04:20] and [ 04:24], 23 March 2007.
Whether specific pictures actually "are", or merely "may be", necessary to the quality of an article is an argument I'll leave to specific article talk pages.
However, I simply can't see blanking from a talk page template the general advisory that "Off-topic discussions, including discussions about the acceptability of images of nudity on Wikipedia, serve no constructive purpose in improving the article, and may be removed."
That remains true whether or not anyone warns the reader/editor of the fact. It's explicit in Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#How to use article talk pages:
:* Keep on topic: Talk pages are not for general conversation. Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal.
:* Be positive: Article talk pages should be used for ways to improve an article, not to criticize, pick apart, or vent about the current status of an article. However, if you feel something is wrong, but aren't sure how to fix it, then by all means feel free to draw attention to this and ask for suggestions from others.
:* Stay objective: Talk pages are not a forum for editors to argue their own different points of view about controversial issues. ...
The template just gave its fair warning up front, without the reader having to go look at the guidelines from the link atop the edit page.
This isn't about [ "removal of legitimate comments from talk pages simply because one disagrees with them"]; it's about keeping on-topic.
To make that clearer, in case anyone else might get confused on the matter, I've [ rephrased it] as:
:As the talk page guidelines state, discussions which are off-topic (not about how to improve the article) may be removed, so this is not the place for discussions about the acceptability of images of nudity on Wikipedia.
Such issues are too broad for a single article's talk page; they are certainly too broad to try settling by deleting content from a template, or by deleting the template itself. They should be taken to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Policies, and openly discussed there. -- Ben TALK/HIST 06:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  23 March 2007 edits to Template:Notcensored2
Talk:White-tailed mongoose

message: If this is the largest mongoose how come no information on it's size is given, how come no information at all is hardly given!?
TeePee-20.7 06:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Information

message: This article leans very heavily on the article Ichneumia albicauda at Animal Diversity Web. Is it acceptable? --Stfg (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much from ADW? 

message: I'm afraid of white tailed mongooses. seems like a phobia. Is there one? We should make an article on fear of these things.--Tepigisthe498th (talk to me!) 23:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phobia of white tailed mongooses
Talk:Falkland Islands Government Air Service

message: Though almost all the settlements they fly to now have grass airstrips
List of settlement airstrips would be useful, (with coords).
Basys (talk) 21:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of landing strips 

message: Shaun Minto was managing director between jan 2008 and jun 2010. He has had many other jobs since than. https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaun-minto-b5479a48 Andhanq (talk) 08:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is primarily about history, it is not a business directory, see WP:NOTDIRECTORY, so this should stay, be dated (as I have done) and then any other key people, like the current GM, added. - Ahunt (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well. This company has existed since 1948. If if it is that important to show one key person who had this post 2,5 years it up to you. But if it is, as you say, primarily about history, all key persons of for instance Ford Motor Company since 1903 should be in the infobox of that company. That is of course not possible. --Andhanq (talk) 21:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If we have a longer list of managing directors, with proper sourcing, we could easily shift that to a new section in the article body. - Ahunt (talk) 21:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaun Minto
Talk:A Quality of Mercy

message: I have the worst urge to tag some of this as original research. 68.39.174.238 06:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text says he was in this episode, but he is not among the actors listed in the boxed-in credits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 18:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does Vic Morrow appear in this episode? 

message: In the section on the partial remake of this episode as a segment in Twilight Zone: The Movie and the fatal accident which killed Vic Morrow and two children it states that "The script called for Connor to be redeemed by saving the two children, but Morrow's death necessitated a darker ending because the available footage did not include the happy ending." I am sure I have heard this elsewhere (and says here the novel of the film goes with this ending), but the relevant section of the Twilight Zone the Movie article substantially contradicts this. It sates that this has been speculated that the film would have ended in this way, but that director and writer John Landis has denied that this was the case and while changes had to be made due to the deaths, the ending was always going to be dark. As this would seem to come from a reliable source and the information here is not cited then I wonder if this should be removed, especially as it is only of limited relevance to this article. Dunarc (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's of no relevance to this article at all, actually; no one has been able to substantiate the claim that the first segment of Twilight Zone: The Movie is an adaptation of "A Quality of Mercy". In fact, some have outright admitted that they base the claim solely on their own personal analysis that the two stories have a couple similarities. I have removed the section you refer to.--Martin IIIa (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:   First segment of Twilight Zone: The Movie - contradiction with another article
Talk:Battle in Berlin

message: the 1st Polish army participated in battle of Berlin so how come they were removed? i tried adding it back but it got reversed. funny how people can remove a country from a historic battle with no reason other than uneducated statements such as "belarus and ukraine are not there" yet they are because they also were soviet union. and Poland was removed with no good reason. Jakub2k03 (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Polish army
Talk:Maggie Nicols

message: Sorry, I still can't work out what exactly is being said here:
:Nicols is expanding the possibilities of vocal expression. She is using her thus developed possibilities with verbal, scenic, and step dancing illustrations of women's everyday life. Nicols also enjoys singing melodic songs.
The first sentence is a bit vague, but I can understand it, and the last is perfectly clear.  The second reads like a direct translation from the German, which should help me.  Would the following be a good interpretation?
:Nicols is working on the expanded possibilites of vocal expression, and using the results, together with [See below] and step dancing to illustrate women's everyday lives.  She also enjoys singing good melodies.
The bracketed bit is where my main problems lie: is the "verbal" just a repeated reference to what's in the first sentence, or something else?  What is meant by "scenic"? --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 19:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last paragraph again
Talk:One Got Fat

message: I might be wrong but I think the Youtube video with BoC playing over 'One Got Fat' is a fan-vid, rather than an official BoC video.--Caesartg (talk) 17:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the same impression. But it's pretty popular (and is the only reason I even knew about the original safety video). I'm not sure how notability works in this sort of case. 203.217.150.69 (talk) 07:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boards of Canada 

message: Is this film based slightly on the rebus nursery rhyme "Ten Little Monkeys"... "Ten little monkeys jumping on the bed... one fell of and bumped his head"  Blah blah blah "No more monkeys jumping on the bed!"
The premise is similar. Monkeys being used to show what not to do. Jumping on the bed = go to the doctor or death.... Riding your bike incorrectly = being hurt or death.
 The "Ten Little Monkeys" rhyme has been around at least since 1953.  I haven't seen the film, but the moral premise seems rooted in the rhyme. Antmusic (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The premise of this film....
Talk:Braunton

message: This page needs a bit of a clean-up
NimbusJDF 07:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: {Untitled]

message: I believe Salt Rock merchandise were worn by members of the cast of Home and Away. Unsure though, was back in the early nineties. lol who knows may have been Neighbours but I distinctly remember this happening on one of the shows. Supposed (talk) 01:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salt Rock and home and away 

message: Who on earth came up with the etymology (name origin), surely it derives from its worship to St Brannoc or Brynach as he was also known? Adam37 (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Capital Market Authority (Saudi Arabia)

message: Did a first cut at wikifying the page.  It seems to be just a copy of the 'about' section from the official web site, which is not good wiki page.  I have condensed it a bit, but needs more, probably needs somebody with some knowledge of the CMA to condense it down further and check current state of the organisation.  just looks like the legal text that establishes the agency, for example has the disputes committee been set up and is it running are the committee members up to date?? Sargdub (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify page

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 14:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Capital Markets Authority (Saudi Arabia) →  – better 2601:540:CA80:5FB0:60A4:2BA3:A606:CBCB (talk) 22:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 April 2024