lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Destiny of the Daleks

message: Adams' biography, Hitchhiker claims that Adams may have written more of the script than is usual for a script editor (probably not as much as City of Death).  mention this?  82.35.13.34 19:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing

message: Movellans only appear in this one episode. SolidPlaid 12:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be pernickity - one serial of 4 episodes.  I'd suggest merging it to List of Doctor Who monsters and aliens, as that is a list of species/ races in Doctor Who.   Of course, the new silly "notability rule" may mean that we have to loose that. StuartDD ( t   •   c ) 12:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge it wherever you guys in the Project think best. The notability "rules" aren't really that new. SolidPlaid 12:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: List of Doctor Who monsters and aliens sounds good to me.  The notability rules ought to be a bit laxer for minor topic lists like that; they save us from having articles on each of the minor topics. Percy Snoodle 12:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree List of Doctor Who monsters and aliens is probally best. futurehawk|talk   19:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, merger  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.117.93 (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: "...and a very badly made oddddball skirt being made for one Dalek as the only new part since 1973's wooden extras, just 1 of which makes it's last appearance in one piece, the only prop that dosen't have parts from other props."
I don't have a clue what that last bit's meant to say. 129.11.249.75 (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It sounds like nonsense to me. I've watched the episode and the Daleks don't seem to look that bad. While the acting of the Daleks may not have been superb (especially in the final scenes as they advanced on the Movellan ship) the condition of the Dalek models seemed fine. I've removed the statement. ~~ [Jam][talk] 09:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the editor was expressing information from this page. If you look closely at the props, particularly in the indoor scenes, it is visible that they are rather battered and mis-matched. BreathingMeat (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, yes, the daleks were battered to death. You can see bits hanging off, and the DVDV mentions it. I meant the sentence itself didn't seem to be in English, but I couldn't work out what it was trying to say in order to fix it. Eiphel (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: This serial seems to have been watched on its original broadcast by more people than any other Doctor Who serial. Was there a reason for that ? If so, is it worth mentioning ? -- Beardo (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viewing figures
Talk:Cognatic succession

message: What have been Ashley Y's reasons to delete the contents of this artiocle, and redirect it to an article which definitely covers only a portion of the subject, and which redirect is easily giving a misleading picture to resders: an erroneous picture that primogeniture covers everything in succession, with regard to cognatic succession????
Ashley Y's edit here seems highly questionable. 62.78.105.140 15:47, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:1st Scottish Parliament

message: Can we get the list in alphabetical order by constituency? Im thinking it would be much more useful that way. Laurel Bush 15:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Jerry Spinelli

message: Does Spinelli generally write Realist young-adult and children's novels? with modern US settings rather than historical fiction, fantasy, etc? If so then that (underscore) is worth saying in the  and something about it worth saying in prose. I don't know enough to say it.
If so then, too, he probably belongs in the general  (see its preface). 
--P64 (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Jerry Soinelli's website domain name had to change. It is now jerryspinelliauthor.com 
Can you change this for me? I am his webmaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.248.84.173 (talk) 03:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: !  GoingBatty (talk) 03:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerry Spinelli's website domain has changed. This is the new address. Jerryspinelliauthor.com
Talk:Fromage

message: fromage is also a type of french cheese (anonymous)
Yes, in Anglo cultures, fromage refers to French style cheeses (as well as being the general French word for cheese), and if you're concerned about English readers mistaking one for another, you can put together a disambiguation for the page. 67.10.131.229 13:22, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Part of this article is written in future tense, but probably should be written in past tense.
Instead of: Ed will be hosting Ultra Fromage on January 1st 
It should read: Ed hosted Ultra Fromage on January 1st 
EDIT: JimmmyThePiep 03:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense 

message: 47.55.136.20 (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2015 

message: This article has seen repeat edits from unregistered user who consistently add unverified and ambiguous content.  Moreover, most of these edits have been from the same users who vandalize other pages.  I am requesting a temporary edit to thwart such changes made to this page. Globe Trekker (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , the place to request page protection is at WP:RFPP. That said, I have protected the article for a month. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Globe Trekker (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection edit request April 2015
Wikipedia talk:Cleanup Taskforce/Members

message: I've posted a question, making sure that I've done everything right, at the discussion page of the main page (click here). Thanks! Flcelloguy   Give me a  note!    Desk 01:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Member

message: The page has become much too difficult to use, especially for the purpose of assigning articles to members.  Part of the problem is that there are two competing indexes.  The list of members by queue length is very hard to maintain, because it has to be synced with the topical table, and because it's too complicated for people to add themselves to it.  I'm going to remove "I'm interested in topic X" statements from the table and reverse-index people by topic of interest, as a start.  I'm also going to reverse-index people who are admins and who can run bots, to eliminate that sparse information from the table. -- Beland 01:06, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidating list 

message: A few participants need desks created for them.  Due to my reverse-indexing activities, unfortunately, this requires looking at the August 6 version to find the full list of their interests. -- Beland 08:05, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating desks 

message: I attempted to make this page more user-friendly in terms of joining the project, with a good bit of reorganization and liberal usage of direct section editing links. The larger question of assigning tasks to active users (and determining just who's active and who isn't) remains a task for another day, I fear, but hopefully this will help a bit, if nothing else by putting information on how to set up a desk out in front as clearly as I could manage it. — Your server has been MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 15:21, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: 
With help from User:Pathoschild, I've created an a CT template that does not require any editing on your part. It links straight to your /Desk. --Avery W. Krouse 07:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Template for Members 

message: Please remove me from any Cleanup Taskforce member list that I am still on. Tcrow777 Talk 08:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaving…
Talk:List of Power Rangers characters

message: Someone needs to reorganize the people by their family names. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I wanted to know who the yellow and pink one is I couldn't tell  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.228.91.234 (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power Rangers 

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tokusatsu#Power Rangers characters titles czar ⨹ 18:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using full name titles as opposed to first names 

message: Formal request has been received to merge the article List of Power Rangers villains into List of Power Rangers characters; dated: October 2018. Proposer's Rationale: Almost every entry in the villains article already exists in the target article. Discuss here. Richard3120 (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Robert Carter

message: Fred, was JC really a politician? I knew he was in government before the Revolution, but thought it was solely in Crown-appointed positions. He wrote very little and (as far as I know) never ran for any office in his life. I could easily be wrong, though. Do you have a source for him being in politics?
--Mac 16:34, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
: I have no other sources than you. The only reason why I called him a politician was that he was in the Virginian Council. --Fred chessplayer (talk) (edits) 17:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:All Around The World

message: The release date for this is off. Shouldn't it be in 1996 or 1997?
The album was released in 1997, this was the final single to be 4released rfrom it, in early 1998.--Crestville 17:07, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Was AATW the longest single to ever go #1 in the UK? If so, should this fact be added to the article?--Play Brian Moore 11:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it used to be in there. Check the history and see why it was removed.--Crestville 16:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact or Fiction?
Template talk:Sound measurements

message: Should this include Mach number, Particle displacement, decibel, sone, mel, phon dB(A) DBrn etc.?
:Particle displacement is in there now. --Kvng (talk) 16:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other measurements

message: I removed Surface. I didn't see what this had to do with the subject. --Kvng (talk) 16:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Surface

message: It starts our associating p with both pressure and SPL, which is nutty. It probably needs U, the volume velocity, or velocity times surface area.  Its history is complicated, and it includes concepts I'm not familiar with, like SVL, SIL, SWL, so I hesitate to jump in.  Are these really sound measurement things?  I see no sources on the linked pages for SVL, SIL, etc.  Dicklyon (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This template is a mess
Talk:Bedford, New Hampshire

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  16:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: Removed trivia about Bedford being mentioned in a television show as this is not encyclopedic.Wkharrisjr (talk) 04:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc

message: Added a citation. I think anyone who is familiar with Bedford knows that the Meyers family is pretty established in the town, but thanks to his mother's recent retirement from teaching French in the Bedford public school system (and subsequent appearance of Seth for the establishment of a foundation in her mother's name), a slew of articles have been written backing up this point. — Devin.chaloux (chat) 15:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added citation for Seth Meyers 

message: Dr James Gilbert Baker, responsible for design and build, inventor of Optical Lens for U2 and Blackbird Spy Planes. Also the Polaroid SX70 lens. Lived in Bedford Nh 2601:18D:8701:D00:51F1:80FF:7569:AEAB (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:Pauline Phillips

message: …but according to her family, she did reconcile with her now deceased sister… — The article doesn't mention anything needing reconciliation.  Need an Abby expert to fix. Thanks, — RandallJones 21:51, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconciled? 

message: After a pretty long online search, I didn't find a single website, other than this one, that said that they were fraternal twins.  Many didn't specify, but most said they were identical, and one even said they were mirror image twins, which often occurs in identical twins.  Whether or not anyone could "tell them apart" is not a criteria to determine whether twins are identical or not.  Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen are "look alike" fraternal twins, while I went to school with twins who were identical, yet because one had health problems from being a twin, she was much shorter, smaller in stature and had a hoarse voice.
See also:
*CBS News
*IMDB.com
*Myeloma Foundation - a cause that Ann Landers' supported, and what she died of
The fact that both of them are female suggests, but does not prove, that they might have been identical twins.
John Paul Parks (talk) 14:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fraternal twins?

message: Could use a photo, especially since the "Ann Landers" article has one. Thanks in advance! Softlavender (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo!

message: The article suggests that the two sisters acted in collaboration with each other.  They most certainly did not.  They were not on speaking terms for much of their professional lives, inflamed by jealousy and ego.  As noted in the link I posted above, "Abby" would offer discounts to newspapers if they would promise not to run "Ann Landers" column, and "Ann Landers" thought "Abby" went into the column-writing business just to embarrass her.John Paul Parks (talk) 15:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Misleading
Wikipedia talk:DICK

message: Change "dick" to "jerk" in this redirect to resolve a double redirect.
spiderjerky (talk) 12:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 13:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 24 October 2014 

message: Please add Category:Deprecated redirects to the WP:DICK page itself.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  20:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: TonyBallioni (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 26 December 2017 

message: Please replace the following:  with: 
. (rcat shell will automatically add fully protected) Thank you, @CLYDEFRANKLIN 18:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 21 August 2022
Talk:Bat World Sanctuary

message: The lawsuit is mentioned in the article, and it has sources. Should the appeal of that judgment be mentioned? The Star-Telegram article stated the defendant would appeal, and the defendant has a press release announcing the appeal. On the one hand, reporting the existence of an appeal would serve WP:NPOV. On the other hand, I don't know of any independent sources that comment on the merits of the appeal. An appeal is a matter of right, so the existence of an appeal does not speak to its merits.
The other lawsuits should not be mentioned until they have RS. Glrx (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: little green rosetta 18:59, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should appeal be mentioned?
Talk:List of counties in Minnesota

message: What county is Albertlea in?
I believe it's in Freeborn county. Rx StrangeLove 18:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some helpful information on U.S. county lists can be found at WP:COUNTYLISTS. Tompw (talk) (review) 16:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject help

message: Is there some logic to listing historical counties in other states, including ones as far away as Indiana?  If so, some text should be added explaining what they have to do with Minnesota.  Or is this just a copy/paste error from other states' county list articles? Strait (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of Minnesota (the part outside the Louisiana Purchase) was in Indiana Territory from 1800, Illinois Territory from 1809, Michigan Territory from 1818.  The rest of Minnesota was added to Michigan Territory in 1834.  Then Wisconsin Territory from 1836, and Iowa Territory from 1838 to 1848.  But I have no access to the evidence I'd need to say whether this history accounts for all of that list. —Tamfang (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical counties in other states?
Talk:Redistribution

message: This page is BADLY in need of a complete overhaul, to achieve NPOV.  It is a completely slanted propoganda piece.  It goes on for many paragraphs about how great and necessary redistribution is, but only gives a few sentances to an opposing point of view.  The "importance" of redistribution is an OPINION, not a fact.  And certainly not NPOV.  And the "finite" resources comment shows a serious lack of knowledge of how a capitalist economy actually works.  It is a common mistake made by the far-left.
This page is no where close to NPOV.
I agree. This is hugely POV and looks more like an entry out of 'SocialistWiki' than Wikipedia. --195.137.69.156 17:29, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to this, although I haven't examined and analyzed what's in the main article much yet, is the notion that democracy must necessarily mean representative districts based on population strata.  I've just been puttering around the Gerrymandering, Redistricting and Representation (politics) pages and put in my two bits worth there about the onetime necessity of the vast and underpopulated ridings once common - and needed - in Canada.  I've been doing historical election districts and, believe me, it's staggering how few voters the northern and mountain ridings might have relative to the urban/suburban norms.  General gist is that the ideals of representation by population have meaning in urban areas, but are difficult to apply across vast distances and rude weather and harsh terrain that typified the rural ridings until recent years (large town growth in some areas has changed things a bit, though the vast emptinesses remain beyond their mini-"urban" cores).  What I saw on the main article looked to me like a lot of mumbojumbo but I'll wade through the verbiage and see if it makes any sense; if I've got anything to add or to tear apart, I'll do it here.Skookum1 08:20, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: NPOV and verify tags added. 
Inheritance taxes: Since large inheritances come not by merit and represent an affront to distributive justice, most societies tax them substantially. However, it is becoming an increasingly political issue whether wealth that has already been taxed as it was earned should be taxed again upon the owner's death. That is why only particularly large inheritances are usually taxed. For example, in the U.S., inheritances were taxed 50% over $1.2 million until 2001. An opponent of the American inheritance tax is George W. Bush, who temporarily repealed it. By renaming the estate tax the "death tax", American conservatives were able to galvanize the population against the tax during the 2000 U.S. Presidential election, despite the fact that over 99% of Americans are not wealthy enough for the tax to be an issue.
This seems to be selling a point of view, also it isn't sourced. - FrancisTyers 01:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality and Verify
Talk:On the fly

message: Should it say "...server side include" or should "include" be deleted?
The term 'on the fly' is also used describe changes or repairs made to machines or processes while they are running. In machine controls, parameters are generally divided into those that can be changed safely while running (speeds, temperature set points, ect.) and those that require the machine to stop before they can take effect.
70.61.121.162 16:28, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Hey all, knowing me I'm probably wrong, but the one to one copy from whatis.com appears to be in violation of whatis.coms copyright policy:
:Note: All content on whatis.com, unless otherwise designated, is solely owned and copyrighted by TechTarget, Inc. Unless there is a prior arrangement, contributors to whatis.com agree to share information, ideas, and suggestions voluntarily and without compensation.
(from: http://whatis.techtarget.com/wcreditsUS/0,290007,sid9,00.html)
So I marked it with a copyvio tag, no hard feelings meant anywhere.
Themania 10:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably Copyright Violation
Talk:Boy (disambiguation)

message: Anyone have any info about the use of the word "boy" to refer to a grown man?? Georgia guy 18:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There should definitely be an article on the use of boy as a racist epithet. JCDenton2052 (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a relevant section in the primary article: Boy#Race. If you think it should be developed into a separate article, the Talk page there would be a good place to suggest it.--ShelfSkewed Talk 19:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Nothing to link to yet:
*The Boys (TV series), is the title of a 1989 short lived TV series
--ShelfSkewed Talk 06:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlink
Talk:Washington County, D.C.

message: Disagree with merge; this would overload the Washington, D.C. article. However it might belong in History of Washington, DC. Massysett 19:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The map on this page depicts Washington County as including Georgetown which was a separate city. Also, the map includes streets and bridges that were built long after Washington County was abolished (e.g. I-66). --D. Monack | talk 00:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, looking closer at the map, it appears not to include Georgetown, so I won't remove the map from the article but my other criticism still holds. Could someone redraw it using an older street map that reflects what the streets looked like in the 19th century?  --D. Monack | talk 00:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing incorrect map