Talk:Trehalose

message: Any information as to whether or not this substance causes a glycemic response (spikes your blood sugar) like sucrose, or if it attenuates this response? 0-0-0-Destruct-0 03:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question - wish I could remember off the top of my head. Trehalase in the gut is the determining step for breakdown into glucose. Its on the villi. Deficiency is rare. It would be the question of rate of release. GraemeLeggett 08:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Glycemic response

message: Xerobiosis, Is this a real term?  Googling it only brings forth two results, both of them mentioned in Wikipedia entries.--Hooperbloob 03:17, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Xerobiosis

message: Can we get this molecule in the haworth projection?  Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 139.62.210.57 (talk) 
:Done. Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Haworth projection

message: The gene for trehalose synthesis was inserted into plants (both chloroplast and nuclear engineering) to investigate use in drought resistance. Rather successful, though it had some effects on growth etc when inserted into nuclear genome. Worthy of addition, under "Biotech. Apps", or perhaps a simple mention? Geno-Supremo (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Plant Engineering 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Although it seems weird for the article to mention hayashibara in the lede and then not mention anything about it elsewhere, here's some (English language) references to Hayashibara's work on the stuff:   --moof (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: this sounds more like advertisement rather that an encyclopedic info, especially because it is in the lead. --ArazZeynili (talk) 13:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The hayashibara stuff 

message: There is evidence of trehalose intolerance, similar in symptoms to lactose intolerance. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11941647 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10522609 . Perhaps it should be mentioned also here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.234.56 (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trehalose intolerance 

message: https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2018/01/09/has-a-sucrose-alternative-contributed-to-the-c-diff-epidemic/
If this is not a good medical secondary source, then there are other medical articles that should have a reference to this source cleaned out.  Keith Henson (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That is helpful. I have gone ahead and added a research section using that, and have cited it in the nutrition section as well. Jytdog (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not going to get in an edit war over this, but I think the journal is significant to the readers.  Science and Nature are the two highest ranking journals in science.  People will take it more seriously than if it had been published in World Weekly News.Keith Henson (talk) 03:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: "take it seriously."  hm.  Not sure what you mean by that. If it had been in World Weekly News it would not be in a WP article.  this (mentioned in the section above) was also a Nature paper, btw.  Jytdog (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources for C. Diff. 

message: Opening para is way too technical.  Tell me in plain English what this stuff is. 173.90.65.191 (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: yes that was bad, thanks for pointing that out.  i improved it. Jytdog (talk) 00:46, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the...? 

message: I don't mind; I'd just like to understand.RussellBell (talk) 06:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was your objection to my edit?