lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shoulder

message: You can have an orgasm by rubbing your shoulder in a distinct motion.
Somebody had written this interesting paragraph. If anyone feels it ought to remain in the article, feel free to back up the statment with some reliable sources... /Eribro 20:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major orgasm

message: This article is very biological, but it fails to mention the property that 51% of all humans care most about(the female portion): Shoulder Breadth. Could someone add information about it? 217.132.96.88 10:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shoulder Breadth

message: I just noticed that the deltoid, a shoulder muscle, and a pretty noticeable one by my estimation, isn't mentioned in this article at all.  I just thought someone with the knowledge to fix this might like that pointed out.Darius4 09:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, not sure if it's correct though, it's a direct paste from the Deltoid muscle page WLU 18:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deltoid

message: Would it be better to say the head of the humerus articulates with the glenoid process of the scapula instead of the lateral scapula? Dura Mater 01:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's factually accurate, go ahead.  WLU 02:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Glenoid Process

message: The Supraspinatus muscle is responsible for the initial 30 degrees of shoulder abduction and is part of the rotator cuff; it should be included here. ~ Carole K. Chiro  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.231.204 (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supraspinatus muscle 

message: The article has been tagged  since July 2007.  I had a look at the article history and here is what I found:
#  added some information on joints on 14 September 2006. Only edit by this IP from Cincinnati, no references.
#  added the following references
* 
* 
: on 15 September 2006.  Only edit from this IP also from Cincinnati, only references no content added.
Sine the section "Joints of the shoulder" have been reworked considerably, I simply remove these references from the article. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 11:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant references 

message: It is related, but should not be on this page.
Will fix myself if I have concurrent time and remembrance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3885:B630:222:19FF:FE26:3203 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shoulder imaging section should be moved to a separate article 

message: I have removed the newly inserted image "Twister on shins and one hand with tattoo above bare shoulders" per bold, revert discuss. Image does not highlight the shoulder as clearly as the present image. Happy to discuss here. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur that the old and current one is best. PriceDL (talk) 07:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous image 

message: I have reverted the addition :File:Healthy shoulders.jpg.  The image adds nothing to the understanding of shoulders and is not really an image of a healthy shoulder. -- Whpq (talk) 12:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Healthy shoulder image
Talk:Expulsions and exoduses of Jews

message: I added the sentence about post-1991 emigration out of the ex-USSR to Israel, the US and Germany.  The US figure of 250,000 with "refugee" status is accurate, but are there cites anywhere for more accurate numbers to Israel and Germany, and for non-refugees to the US?  13:51, 03 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. That history explains alot, especially the Talk page from the original link. In that light, you have done a very creditable job of listing the long history of cases of Jewish refugees. The intro just needs to be NPOVed. I don't think the focus on Sephardim in Israel is appropriate for the page title which is much broader. Thanks. Alberuni 05:04, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: From the article I see the following:
'The State of Israel (population in 1948 was about 650,000) absorbed approximately 600,000 of these refugees'
I suggest information is added on Israeli policies relating to the refugees as it is not clear how this worked. 
Another comment relates to the definition of jewish refugees in the beginning of the article. Is it not recognized that this term is used on all jewish refugees? Tiller1 23:00, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel and jewish refugees 

message: Add Maldives to the list of Expulsions of Jews by country.
Sources: 
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/2/maldives-bans-israeli-passport-holders-from-entering-the-country
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240603-maldives-bans-israelis-from-entering-country-over-gaza-war/
https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2024/06/363011/maldives-bans-israeli-passport-holders-over-war-on-gaza
https://thecradle.co/articles-id/25223
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/why-has-maldives-banned-israeli-passport-holders-what-happens-now-5805906 Nith5546 (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: the sources don't even mention the word "Jewish".  M.Bitton (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 June 2024
Talk:Primitive equations

message: I've converted a bunch of equations from pseudo-notation into TeX markup. But two of them contained the strange term g(r/r), which looks like a typo of some sort to me. Somebody who actually knows the relevant equations should check and fix if needed. (I'd guess the second r should be r_0, but I'd be guessing.) -dmmaus 00:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Equation formatting

message: I'm not going to change it, but is anyone familiar enough with that notation to verify its accuracy..and for that matter explain its variables?
I know it as:
F_{rx} = \nu [\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial z^2}
F_{ry} = \nu [\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial z^2}
F_{rz} = \nu [\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2 w}{\partial z^2}
This is obviously not as succinct as in vector notation, it can be compacted but...I learned it through a matter of substitutions which aren't discussed here.
For example \nu = \frac{\mu}{\rho} seems particularly useful.  However it's never explained.  In fact a lot of this is never explained; Cv, r, or m...it seems this entire section if not the entire page have been ripped straight from text books without any comprehension by the transcriber...OR no efforts by the writer to imbue understanding onto the readers.  I could re-write this section in a notation I'm more accustomed to, but unless someone can explain some of the variable notations I can't help it as is.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.13.207 (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Frictional Force

message: Some sections are poorly written. For example, an equation is thrown up, yet some of the variables are not explained anywhere! So how is a reader supposed to understand what they represent?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.142.1.10 (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please describe variables
Talk:Machine

message: I am slowly and carefully trying to reverse the degradation of this article.  But I worry that at some point, I will reawaken the "electronic-systems-are-machines" crowd.  Their argument is that electrons running through wires satisfy the forces and controlled movement definition of a machine.  This makes cellphones, flat screen tvs, computers, networks, video games, e-books, animals and plants, and just about everything a machine, which in a way causes the word to lose its meaning.  Recent vandalism to this article repeatedly added the word hat as a machine, which would fit the "electronic-systems-are-machines" definition if it included wearable electronics such as earphones or glasses. Prof McCarthy (talk) 22:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Hats' was originally added as a joke, probably by Mark Watson, for the Taskmaster TV show (S05E02). One could assume that subsequent edits were copycats once the show aired. Nzd (talk) 00:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions to this article

message: Because of this edit made after the recent protection expired I have protected the article for 6 months. I previously protected the article from for two weeks 16–23 September 2017 so that "autoconfirmed or confirmed access" was needed. Ie if an IP address or a new user make a change it had to be confirmed by an experienced user. I would have preferred to reinstate that form of protection. However while that was in place there was on average one case of vandalism a day which while not displayed had to be reverted.
Therefore reluctantly I have now protected the page against any edit by IP or new users for six months.
See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BiffyClyroFan13
-- PBS (talk) 10:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article protected for six months
Talk:Cyclic group

message: Advanced mathematicians have difficulty understanding sometimes how the notions they use may be perplexing for everyone non-familiar with their subject. I made some small additions at "Integer and modular addition" and "Modular multiplication" to help explain the notion of "generators" and why, for instance, g must be a coprime to n to be a generator. Feel free to improve if you think you can.
On a general note, however, this article needs a lot of work to become comprehensible for everyone non-expert. The subchapter "Additional properties" seem very hard to grasp for instance, and some things, like "For a finite cyclic group of order n, and every element e of the group, en is the identity element of the group" don't seem to add up, at least as modular arithmetic is concerned. 
In general, some aspects of the article would benefit from a makeover...
2A02:587:4526:EA00:4940:D912:B4:B87C (talk) 00:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  For beginners
Talk:List of past countries in Europe

message: This seems rather pointless to me. There are hundreds of european countries that no longer exist, and I fail to see why anyone would want to look up a list of them.
Sandman 19:38, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It was listed twice. I think one time is enough. --Wik 21:43, Aug 30, 2003 (UTC)
Oops! I didn't see that. Vancouverguy 21:43, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Overhead projector

message: Can we get a timescale? They were common up to the 1990s, but when did they first appear? -- Tarquin 20:47, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, newer is not always better, and in many ways a computer is less easy to use interactively than standing by an overhead with a marker in hand. But this a wiki, so please stop whining about the article and fix what you think is broken. DMahalko (talk) 04:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussions without headers

message: "While a computer projection system eliminates the need to create hard copy transparencies (which can be quite expensive, particularly if made in color) of the slide show presentation, many presenters make both in case the computer hardware fails."
Come on now, really, does any of you still prepare backup overhead projector transparencies in case the digital projector fails??? That used to be the case up to some 6-7 years ago, but not any more. Apart from that, for all the other overwhelming reasons that favour the use of digital projectors mentioned in the article, it's pretty difficult nowadays to find an overhead projector available in a conference or a meeting.
Best regards,
Antonis (25. Nov. 2010) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.48.133.8 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Still both Powerpoint and transparencies?

message: I have doubts that this is a reliable source—currently ref 1: Projection Apparatus History. GitHub/Pedago  Tony (talk)  10:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced it with a better source. Graham87 10:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification
Talk:Famous Romanian people

message: Should this page even exist if all the people on it are listed in List of Romanians? Vancouverguy 22:45, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is the list of famous (as in internationally famous) Romanians, whereas the other one will be a lot more extensive (although it isn't really right now :)) -- Gutza 11:16, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Yoga Sutra

message: mental note: merge with Yoga Sutras Tristanb
----
I moved Yoga Sutras here. Both are acceptable, because Sutra means both aphorism and a compilation of such aphorisms; however, there are other Sutras like the Sulba Sutras which are classes of such collections, and it is better to reserve the plural for those. Compare Kama Sutra. -- Arvindn 11:23, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Demo

message: Is this page not a tad ridiculous? I mean, Demo is simply an abbreviated form of Demonstration. Does it really deserve all this? -- Pamplemousse 03:22, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: No one ever refers to a computer demo as a 'demonstration'.  Same goes for music demos.   -- Tlotoxl 23:55, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)

message: I have split the article up so it is now just a disambiguation page.  Now I'm working on updating all links that point here.  I'm about 30 deep into about 150 separate articles.  —TeknicTalk/Mail 11:51, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belati
Talk:W. W. Rouse Ball

message: seemed to me WP needed a page for sorting out WWRB ... like whether his name is Ball or Rouse-Ball and WTF the WW stand for ... so i got the ball rolling took the plunge. Kwantus
This should be moved to a more appropriate title... W. W. Rouse Ball ? That will work... Dysprosia 03:46, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: : Walter William Rouse Ball was the son and heir of Walter Frederick, of 3, St John's Park Villas, South Hampstead, London.
Walter Frederick, or Walter Frederick Rouse Ball, or Walter Frederick Ball, or some other name?
Do the English learn at someone's knee how to recognize an unhyphenated compound surname? —Tamfang (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  surname(s)
Talk:Tengwar

message: It looks like the description of the fellowship's tattoos as Quenya-mode is from a tumblr post. I think the point the person is trying to make is that for the orthographic english mode the amaticse should be over the other nuumen. However using the nunticse to mark the e after the consonant is specific to the orthographic english mode. In addition, quenya mode is phonemic, so the dipthong in nine would not be marked with amaticse. Unfortunately most sources do not mention this subtlety (in fact referring to the tattoos the "Elvish word for nine", which is very wrong), I can't really figure out if this use of "Quenya-mode" is standard. I reworded to avoid mention of "Quenya-mode", which is potentially more detail than is necessary for this trivia anyway. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, we do rather need a better-informed and more reliable source; "fixing" things from personal knowledge is always going to tread a fine line very close to OR, so while correcting errors is good, the approach is problematic. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Quenya-mode tengwar" tattoos 

message: The article remains an embarrassment, for want of a linguist to make sense of the many excellent but technical sources available. I'll note that [18], Martínez 2011, has quite a detailed analysis of the subject. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Yōjirō Ishizaka

message: I would greatly appreciate it if someone could enter the Japanese titles of Ishizaka's works, and also the non-romanized form of Aoi Sanmyaku. --Zippy 08:01, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iraqi Governing Council

message: From CNN "Mohammed Baker al-Alum, a leading Shiite politician, announced Saturday that he was suspending his membership in the U.S.-appointed Iraq Governing Council in protest of the massacre at the Imam Ali Mosque."
----
:leaders who were appointed by the Coalition Provisional Authority
When were they appointed? Who chose them, Bremer?
----
My slant on the council is partisan, I admit. I'm a big fan of George Bush and a supporter of Paul Bremer.
I intend to revise the article to reflect my belief in a slow, steady progress from total US/UK dominance of Iraq to full independence. I will emphasize power held (or "claimed") by Bremer's civilian administration. I'll use words like granted by the CPA, etc.
AFAIK, Bremer's group will cede power to Iraqi civilians in stages, subject to BREMER'S opinion on whether the locals are ready and able to put democratic principles into practice.
Please, everyone, watch my edits closely to ensure that I don't indulge in wishful thinking or similar fantasies. And please help me refrain from slyly injecting pro-US propaganda into the articl too. --Uncle Ed 19:12, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After a little research, I'm pretty sure the official name was "Iraqi Interim Governing Council"(obviously emphasis added); however, I would suggest a move to Iraqi Governing Council, a very common abbreviation for the full correct name that gets many more google hits than either that or the current name.  Of course the first line of the article would say the full name.  Is there agreement?--Pharos 03:17, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: I'm pretty sure the official name was "Iraqi Interim Governing Council"(obviously emphasis added), but the abbreviated "Iraqi Governing Council" is by far the most common form.--Pharos 02:24, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Iraq Interim Governing Council]] &rarr; [[Iraqi Governing Council]]
Talk:Albert Fish

message: There was a song about Albert Fish by steampianist. Perhaps include it in the popular culture section. YT link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0yo8BREgD0 75.135.172.96 (talk) 22:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. That's where I first heard of him. I agree that it should be added under pop culture. I was surprised not to see it there, but I also commonly listen to weird, niche music. Maskedmarrow (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The song by steampianist 

message: A recent Reddit post provided a new image of Fish when he was 19. See link: https://www.reddit.com/r/serialkillers/comments/vca98y/a_mugshot_of_albert_fish_taken_in_1889_he_was/
Enhanced image: https://imgur.com/gallery/8VrqAQD
Would be nice to put in his 'early life' section. Contributor72511996 (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images of Fish in 1889 

message: The letters are too explicit and should not be shown in this article 37.159.102.226 (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, we can’t give a person like this a voice. 37.159.102.226 (talk) 17:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored, even if something is found to be exceedingly offensive. Sorry. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

text: The letters at least provide some sort of aspect to Albert Fish life and in my opinion thus contribute to the article James dick (talk) 03:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, they offer good insight into his psyche. Gawaon (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. The letters show how deeply twisted and broken he was. It really gives a glimpse into the depraved psyche of that terrible monster. It also shows the horror of the parents, the terror of the confirmation, even though not knowing feels worse. The terror and disgust of knowing what atrocities were committed to your child, who you loved, and were praying was still alive. It's a source that should be shared, but should possibly be warned about beforehand. Maskedmarrow (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letters 

message: Alberts first victim's last name was Kedden. The papers mispelled it when he went missing 2603:7080:9342:3C00:AD6A:33E1:86B3:1C45 (talk) 10:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source for that? Gawaon (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bedden 

message: Fish’s mothers age is absurd and not mathematically sound in this article.  Please facilitate a change for accuracy. 68.68.91.10 (talk) 15:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you think so? According to the article, she was 31 or 32 when he was born. That sounds plausible enough. Gawaon (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly stated mothers age.
Talk:French frigate Surcouf

message: IMHO, according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) the name of this page should be French frigate Surcouf. I'll procede if there no objection. --Ann O'nyme 11:58, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Mason Bogie locomotive

message: Copied from my Everything2 writeup. --Morven 12:49, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Carnatic music

message: @ C.Fred. Please check the edits by CatTheMeow on this page. Not only did he not provide a single source to back up his claim, but actively removed content which has been cited from multiple independent academic sources (both Indian and western). Clear case of disruptive editing. Reo kwon (talk) 10:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The source nowhere mentions the claimed information in the article CatTheMeow (talk) 10:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @CatTheMeow, @Reo kwon: The source that seems central to one of the edits doesn't seem to support anything in the related paragraph. We may need a deeper discussion about how much material is unsourced and in need of removal. —C.Fred (talk) 18:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

text:  Vijaya Ramaswamy does mention Telugu predominating in the evolution of Carnatic music. Another one mentions that most compositions are in Telugu and Sanskrit. That is what is written in those sentences. Reo kwon (talk) 06:14, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive edits 

message: Please 2409:4070:428A:A900:0:0:89C:48A1 (talk) 12:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karnataka folk song main points
Talk:Princeps senatus

message: A list of princeps senatus would be very nice thing to put here, but where can we get it? Muriel Gottrop 15:32, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of principes? 

message: For my part this isn't a challenge—I'm merely curious—but I have heard from a few people that there weren't any prerogative powers associated with the Princeps Senatus during the time of the late Republic.  Can the author of that portion of the article, or anyone else for that matter, cite sources that confirm this?--LordSnow 16:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for Late Republic Prerogatives 

message: Much of this article is now outdated and obsolete, relying heavily on Mommsen, whose work is around 150 years old. Modern scholarship has revised many of his assumptions, but it needs someone with more hands on knowledge than me to take on the work. Oatley2112 (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Putting it under here because Oatley supra says we should do an update to reflect new scholarship. That having happened, I guess we should be happy it was only a 10 year delay instead of a 12 or 14 year delay haha. Ifly6 (talk) 15:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated and obsolete article
Talk:Vodafone Romania

message: UPC Romania been suggested to be merged with this page, but I don't agree with this as UPC Romania although it been claimed by Vodafone it doesn't been all the information from UPC Romania should be in the Vodafone as it just would be off-topic if we would just merge all the history information that has nothing to do with Vodafone. I suggest that they should be as before... except that this page needs to mention somewhere that they claimed UPC Romania. Editoneer (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 