Talk:Pannenkoek

message: What are the criteria for the inclusion of restaurants on this page? Should they even be here? - AKeen (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question, I would say yes because this is a fairly novel food in the United States and a very limited number of restaurants serve them but there is not sufficient information to warrant an article specifically on any of the restaurants. --BenFranske (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restaurants

message: This question is directed more towards our English-reading Dutch guests: how do you normally eat your pannekoeken?
I asked a Dutch guy today and he said that he just puts sugar on his--not much mention of ingredients.   I'm an American-raised fan of pannekoeken, so my preference for breakfast fruits (a banana) and nuts (a là shortstack pancakes with pecans) comes from my personal experience, not what I acquired in the Netherlands.  The Europeans were all over the place, getting a variety of (icky) ingredients included in their pannekoek order.
I just so happen to be going to a pannekoeken dinner with a bunch of Benelux citizens, so I'll keep an eye out to see what they choose.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.163.87 (talk) 18:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Normal ingredients/toppings for pannenkoeken? 

message: I would like to swap the current contents of Pannenkoek and Pannekoek.  The Dutch spelling changed a few years ago and I would prefer the article title to reflect this.  If no one objects, I will do so in a few weeks. Pietrow ☏ 09:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dutch spelling changed, but it is best known in English under the old spelling, so it should remain Pannekoek. Jonathunder (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article

message: Should that picture of the Bacon pannekoek from a Dutch restaurant in the U.S really be there? it looks horribly unlike dutch pannenkoeken.(far too thick) Rody1990 (talk) 11:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pannekoek picture 

message: Kaiserschmarm is not so much a pancake/pannekoek as it is a pancake gone wrong, with whipped cream added.
I would suggest instead of Kaiserschmarm, Palatschinken is used. de:Palatschinken is used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.203.137.71 (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaiserschmarm vs Palatschinken 

message: This page links to the Dutch pannenkoek page, but that Dutch page is not about the Dutch pancake. That page discusses pancakes in general. And that page (the Dutch pannenkoek page) links to the English pancake page... Not to the English pannekoek page.
Anyway, this article should be more clear... The word is written incorrect. The page says "A pannenkoek or pannekoek [...]" That's incorrect. The only correct writing form is pannenkoek. In schools, nobody is allowed to write pannekoek, as it's not the right form. Het Witte Boekje is not recognized... Only by some papers and by NOS (and other media). However, the article should say that pannenkoek is the right writing form, but the incorrect pannekoek is more known. It looks like people are allowed to write pannekoek, but they aren't, actually. ElMosquitoRápido (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Spelling authorities can't actually decide what's right or wrong, because it's for every individual person to decide what they want to use. In the same way, a country might have an official language but that doesn't mean it's the only correct way to speak. In any case, it's clear that Dutch people don't always agree on what is right. So in the interest in WP:NPOV both spellings should be presented. Besides, the spelling change only happened in 1995, so there are probably plenty of sources using the other spelling. CodeCat (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect multilanguage links 

message: It's been 4 years since someone put a Template for lack of references, and still the only two references actually in the article are about the Spelling, and country of origin. Both of which are in the first sentence, which means that ONLY THE FIRST SENTENCE OF THE ENTIRE ARTICLE IS SOURCED! How did this stay like that so long?Rody1990 (talk) 05:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References, why so little?