lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tancred of Hauteville

message: Should the crusading Tancred be known by this name?  He was not of the Hauteville male line - his mother was a daughter of Robert Guiscard, I believe.  I'm not sure what his father's family name was. john k 06:42, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That is what he is always called though...maybe he actually ruled a place called Hauteville. I'll see if I can find any info on that. Adam Bishop 07:11, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: Okay, contrary to my claim that he is "always" called that (which I seem to have made up entirely), I found that in books about the First Crusade he most often just called "Tancred," or "Tancred, nephew of Bohemund." Calling him "of Hauteville" seems to be popular in French books, although not consistently. Contemporary works just call him "Tancred" or sometimes use one of his later titles like "lord of Galilee." So your suggestion is good - that also fits the naming conventions (as far as I understand) where we use the title at the time of death, which was Prince of Galilee in this case. I'll move him to a new page. Adam Bishop 19:34, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: They're not the same. Adam Bishop 17:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But everything on this page (the talk page) refers to Tancred, Prince of Galilee, right?  Not this Tancred.  Just so i'm clear....  Cheers, Lindsay 15:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: It's fixed up. The dates for the sons were when they reigned as counts; I've changed that to death dates, since their dates of birth aren't really known. The dates of birth/death and place of death for Tancred belong to Tancred, Prince of Galilee; I've removed them. Very little about this Tancred himself is known. Choess (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I added a link to his great-grandson, with the same name and the same place. I guess the old versions of this page were pretty mixed up, but hopefully this links the 2 people. Tancred, Prince of Galilee was the junior. I like to saw logs! (talk) 07:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will the real Tancred of Hauteville please stand up?
Talk:Cassandre

message: I just reverted an edit which looks like a copyright violation from;
:http://perso.club-internet.fr/rmouron/index3VA.html
However, this looks like a useful source for expanding this stub. -- Solipsist 06:56, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "In his later years, Adolphe Mouron Cassandre suffered from bouts of depression."
This is not a clinical diagnosis.
:Michael David 11:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinical Depression? 

message: Day of death.
I have found numerous sources stating he has committed suicide on June 17th and not the 19th.
One of the sources is the French Wikipedia page.
http://www.evene.fr/celebre/biographie/cassandre-4085.php
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandre_(graphiste)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandre
http://www.gal-123.com/en/the_gallery/press_release.html
http://www.meeetooo.info/portail/infusions/event_calendar_panel/event_calendar.php?dd=24&mm=1&yy=2007
http://visiondetunel.blogia.com/
http://www.linotype.com/358/aboutthedesigner.html
his semi-official page:
http://rmouron.club.fr/index4VA.html
I haven't found any French sources stating June 19th, and seeing that Cassandre was well known in France, I tend to believe the 17th is the correct date. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Synista (talk • contribs) 16:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Day of death 
Talk:Scroll (disambiguation)

message: When I'm thinking about a "scroll", in the traditional sense, what length of text should I be thinking about?  Could they be made arbitrarily long, and rolled-up?  When I hear that the Library of Alexandria had 400,000-700,000 scrolls, is that more like 500,000 pages, or 500,000 books?  -- Creidieki 17:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long were traditional scrolls? 

message: The name "Scroll (parchment)" in not quite right name for this article, as this deals with scrolls, and they were not predominantely parchment but papyrus. I suggest this article to be the main article and others (see Scroll) for other uses? If nobody objects it, I will make the change in two weeks. --Aethralis 09:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the page. --Aethralis 07:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the article?
Talk:Workopolis

message: Page was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion and the consensus was to keep this article. See: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Workopolis. Cool Hand Luke 07:37, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: This article is written like an advertisement. The banner is staying up until someone makes key changes
"Workopolis [1] is Canada's leading online career-solutions provider drawing more than 3 million unique visitors monthly, "
This is the lede and it's aleady boasting the companies success. Every sentence sounds like this. I'm in favour of dumping the article entirely.
Qc (talk) 08:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: فيزا عمل 46.58.212.216 (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  فيزا الى كندا
Talk:Fey

message: I'm a little new to this Wiki thing, but shouldn't this be broken up into several seperate pages and replaced by a simple disambiguation page?
Definitely. The Mexican pop group article needs to be separated, you're exactly right. -Apol0gies
Did a simple split. Still doesn't look tidy though. (shouldn't complain but am not Wiki enough to do the edit).
Corrected the opinionated "erroneously (correctly = fay)" entry. The words "fey" and "fairy" do not have set spellings (two of the few words that don't), perhaps because of the mercurial nature of the entities described by said word, nor has any group of authority stated as such that one version of spelling is correct (the word appears in many dictionaries under different spellings), besides the fact that language is mutable and, hence, not necessarily confined to one's spelling preferences. Personally, I use "fey" and never "fay," though I've seen many people use both.
-Iro
Switched the village of Féy from Alsace to its current resting place of Lorraine. Let's not get our Féys mixed up now. 
-- Mille sabord 23:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anson (CDP), Maine

message: Is it a town or a CDP?  If it's a CDP, why is it in the town category?  Also, why isn't the article at Anson, Maine? john k 08:07, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe its a CDP, because that's what it says in the title. However, although I am not familiar with Northeastern geography, a similarity I've been seeing in articles in states up here are that towns are large tracts of land that hold small communities within them. This CDP would be one of said "communities," if you may. --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 15:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Heteronym

message: Let's leave this as it is, then. This is a stub after all, and when it gets properly developed these problems won't exist. I will just remove the "See Also" as it will probably never be used. --Sn0wflake 03:48, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settled. 

message: I don't believe that heteronyms are a type of homonym, as is stated in the article.  If you reason this out looking at the root of the word even, it's obvious that it's not true.  Besides which, a homonym is defined as words which have the same spelling (typically) and pronunciation.  Whereas heteronyms have the same spelling, but a different pronunciation - the only similarity being that in both hetero and homo nyms, the spelling is the same - and even this is not always the case, as some homonyms do not have the same spelling.   I've reworded the article to reflect this inaccuracy.Wisher 18:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A type of Homonym?  

message: Are these the initials of contributors?Rich (talk) 08:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also can't help but notice that most of this list is in alphabetical order, but only goes up to 'C' - it looks like this may have been copied verbatim from some website somewhere, and they just didn't go past the first page or something, but no source is given, so we don't know.  (The out-of-order ones at the bottom were probably added by other people, but I don't feel like digging through the history right now.) Lurlock (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why all the NPs and BHs after the examples?

message: This page really should be merged into Heteronym (linguistics) or vice versa, with most of the latter remaining.  The current page seems a little low on quality... I'll start the process myself soon.  -- χγʒ͡ʒγʋᾳ (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: if it's merely the verb and adjective form, like in "attribute", then i have doubts. Anyway, examples like that are less interesting than pairs like "bow".Rich (talk) 07:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: i'm not so sure that most of the examples are true heteronyms

message: Structure of kidney
 Albert G. Toe (talk) 03:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  biology
Talk:Polish Americans

message: Polish Americans is definitely notable, but does that mean every subpage is notable.  Is List of U.S. cities with large Polish-American populations notable?  I guess yes, based upon the data being collected and sorted in census data.  What about Draft:List of place names of Polish origin in the United States?  There's an abundance of referencing of entries, but not overarching referencing to support the claim that this is a notable list.  I lean to accepting the draft, but am seeking comment here, as well as wondering where the line is for inclusion of such lists. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:59, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability of list subpages
Talk:National parks of Scotland

message: It strikes me that we would really be best off with a single National parks of Great Britain or National parks of the United Kingdom article. The roles and issues of national parks are identical in both areas. Grinner 13:14, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)
:It was suggested on WP:FAC (where National parks of England and Wales is currently doing rather well) but the rationale for keeping Scotland and Northern Ireland separate is that they have their legislation and their own specific issues.  I have some sympathy with the proposel to merge them, since the legal form and many of the issues are actually very similar (I think I even suggested merging them when England and Wales were on WP:UKCOTW). -- ALoan (Talk) 14:05, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with the proposal to merge. The three separate areas have significant enough differences to justify different articles. I particularly have in mind here the historical context of the formation of the English and Welsh parks, as opposed to the Scottish ones (and the yet-to-be-completed debate about Northern Ireland). Even if the result is the same (which is arguable) the process was very different, and the social and political context were worlds apart. There are issues facing parks in general, and issues that differ across all parks, perhaps with a grouping of issues around upland management, but otherwise country divisions seem to be helpful. There are particualar issues facing Scottish parks - such as the Cairngorms railway debate - which can be usefully added to the article about that country, but are sufficiently different to the other countries to be worth keeping separate, IMHO. Naturenet 14:31, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge/Demerge?

message: I would be great if someone could do a map of the parks. Ravenhurst 17:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Map please
Talk:Japanese war crimes

message: cite it or live without it. Elinruby (talk) 04:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  uncited since 2009 is long enough 

message: Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimes against humanity category removal
Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2003

message: These are the #1 Hits of 2003: - where exactly?  Some clarification would be good -- Chuq 11:47, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: Making it harder to read.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.22.1 (talk) 02:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please adjust your screen resolution. --Efe (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I think the pictures are squeezing the table
Talk:Library of Congress Country Studies

message: Cf. Wikipedia:Library of Congress Country Studies. --Joy [shallot] 12:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have started a Wikiproject that involves taking the public domain LOC Country Studies and incorporating them into Wikipedia.  Go to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Library of Congress Country Studies to participate or observe progress.--Bkwillwm 01:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikiproject LOC Country Studies

message: A number of articles about Soviet Union quote this source. I understand now all critics of US sovietologists. Why people quote such absurd texts?Xx236 (talk) 10:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet Union

message: This article's entry on Thailand refers me, not to the LOC country study, but the Wikipedia's article! THAT article's entry for LOCCS refers me right back here! I have to pay for my Internet time and don't appreciate the joke. --Pawyilee (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarifying the circular reference issue advises users what actually happens, and adding it to the article qualifies  as sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts. --Pawyilee (talk) 08:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular reference 

message: * Country Studies online at the Library of Congress
* Country Studies
This website contains the on-line versions of books previously published in hard copy by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress as part of the Country Studies/Area Handbook Series sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army between 1986 and 1998. Each study offers a comprehensive description and analysis of the country or region's historical setting, geography, society, economy, political system, and foreign policy.
;Others
The LOCCS website offers subject matter only one page at a time, which may then be copied. As all text is in public domain (though not all images,) other web sites may be found by search that offer complete studies, making it much easier to locate matters of interest. Such should then be compared with that at LOCCS to insure it is up to date. Example:
*Mongabay country profiles
--Pawyilee (talk) 01:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful links bumped from front page
Talk:Norwich City F.C.

message: DO you think anything should be put in about the Goal Celebration song Samba De Jenerio - Bellini. Because you have to admit that is the greatest theme of all time. Gaming-kid 14:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goal Scoring Theme 

message: Removing from the article and pasting here; the article has changed enough in the last 15 years that having the 2007 spoken version isn't useful. Hog Farm  Talk 00:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old spoken wikipedia file 

message: has the wrong flag, it is listed as England but he should be Ireland. He was born in Cork, Ireland and is capped for Ireland national team. 2A02:C7C:C852:9800:FD68:C8AE:4219:A635 (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: under the players section 2A02:C7C:C852:9800:FD68:C8AE:4219:A635 (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam Idah
Talk:Sea tulip

message: If I recall correctly, there are a number of different species of sea tulips, although all share the same obvious features ('stem' and 'flower').  As such, having this page describe only a single type of sea tulip may be incorrect.  Feel free to move the current content to a separate page if/when more sea tulip species are added.
--pjf 13:23, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Another 6 years have passed, and another person has wandered by with the same thought :  I have reversed the redirect that was here, and left a stub article.  But only found two species commonly known as 'Sea Tulips', if there are others they can be included, and perhaps the introductory passage amended --Tony Wills (talk) 06:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of cities and towns in Belarus

message: Is there an official transliteration from Belarussian Cyrillic alphabet to Latin alphabet? It might be a good idea to include the Belarussian names of the cities in Cyrillic alphabet, like on the List of cities in Ukraine. Markussep 13:48, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please let us discuss this in one place,  Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (city names)#Belarus and put final decisions into Wikipedia:Naming conventions (city names)#Belarus `'mikka (t) 03:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Belarusian cities naming conventions

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 04:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: List of cities and largest towns in Belarus →  – The list here already includes all 115 cities and towns (gorod / horad), rather than just the largest towns. Mellk (talk) 11:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 January 2024
Talk:Madhvacharya

message: The picture of Madhvacharya does not seem to be an authentic one. The tilaka mark on the forehead is different.
-Polytope4D (talk) 03:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Madhvacharya
Talk:Strong typing

message: * Visual BASIC is a hybrid language. In addition to including statically typed variables, it includes a "Variant" data type that can store data of any type. Its implicit casts are fairly liberal where, for example, one can sum string variants and pass the result into an integer literal.
What is the meaning of the phrase 'integer literal' here?  I have always understood the term to mean an integer that is in decimal form in the source code, i.e. in the code:'int x = 5' - '5' is an integer literal.  In this context, the above quote doesn't make sense, as there can obviously be no assignment into an integer literal.  I would correct it, but I have no idea what is trying to be said there, and I'm not familiar enough with VB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  68.209.189.7  (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual Basic Literal 

message: Recently there was a change to the article that was described as "Better introduction".  While I would be happy to see a better introduction to this article, I think that the introduction that was inserted wasn't better.
The substantive addition of the new introduction was the statement that:
:In computer science, a strongly-typed programming language is one that is not weakly-typed.
This is an inane truism.  The linked article weakly-typed programming language  added nothing useful; it was a link back to this one.  I have replaced it with a redirect.
The introduction that the article has now suggests that Strongly-typed language has no generally agreed-upon meaning:
:the phrase strongly-typed, when applied to a programming language, may have one of several incompatible meanings,  depending on context. 
-- Dominus 14:21, 1 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:Presidential Palace, Warsaw

message: It would be more idiomatic in English and better in the English Wikipedia to entitle this entry Presidential Palace, Warsaw.  Just a thought. --Wetman 15:11, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That's a great history of article, but we need something about layout and such.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout
Talk:ABBA: The Album

message: Not the most important question in the world, but since this was obviously marketed and named as a tie-in to ABBA: The Movie, doesn't this mean that the title is meant to be ABBA: The Album?
Yes, the normal convention is that the front cover has the artist's name and the album name on the front cover, but this doesn't always follow when the album contains the artists' name anyway.
For example; this album by Queen isn't called "II", it's called "Queen II". And this album's cover doesn't say "ABBA - ABBA" even though that's the accepted artist and title (because it would look silly, obviously :-)).
Ubcule (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The article, like the album, mentions a 'mini musical' The Girl with the Golden Hair but there is no other information about it on Wikipedia. Time for a new article? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini-musical 

message: It sold 60,000 there,according to Billboard(Coachtripfan (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  new Zealand 

message: It has sold 60,000 in NZ - which is platinum x4 (Coachtripfan (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Zealand 

message: Article needs a critical reception section. Unschool 01:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CR missing 

message: As this did not warrant a stand alone article and the content is strongly related to Abbe The Album I moved its content and incorporated it here. In essence, three songs of this mini musical would be included in the release while a fourth was omitted altogether and re-written at a later stage. Implemented a non-controversial redirect.Karst (talk) 11:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Girl with the Golden Hair merge 

message: Why have that special section on singles for a few countries? The US and Canada section has the Canadian chart positions for Take a Chance on Me but does not credit this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coachtripfan (talk • contribs) 18:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singles section
Talk:Judiciary of Malaysia

message: Datuk Param Cumaraswamy once published a report on the Malaysian Judiciary to the UN (the same judiciary would eventually prosecute him for this). Anyone want to add the relevant bits?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Malbear (talk • contribs) 
:If you could highlight the link to the report, then maybe. =) __earth (Talk) 05:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Voulez-Vous

message: Certification shoild be for 50,000 sales - based on year of release (1979) Coachtripfan (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belgium